Premise: "Civil libertarians denounced it as an improper church-state partnership, a sectarian scheme to milk the taxpayer, and a feel-good diversion from the rest of the coalition's agenda." If this premise is true, what does that tell us about whether it entails the hypothesis "Civil libertarians have celebrated the partnership's role in supporting the coalition's core agenda."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no