There are qualities of community-driven ﬁltration of disinformation that
make it preferable to automated, algorithmic approaches. Algorithms are
opaque, possessing hidden biases that can be difﬁcult to ascertain as a user.
Similarly, algorithms are designed and maintained by the platform, effectively
delegating decisions over truth and falsity to the company operating the service.
In contrast, a ﬁltration approach that leverages community debate and
moderation can take place in a more transparent manner and leaves decisions
about disinformation to the users. Amending CDA 230 may incentivize
platforms to minimize risk by adopting the algorithmic approach, thereby
squeezing out better, more participatory options.54
Social_Media_and_Democracy