14

Agreeableness), etc.) as evidence of convergent validity. For these and following results,
we use Evans [102]’s cut-offs for considering correlations as moderate, strong, and very
strong (viz. .40 ≤ |r| < .60; .60 < |r| ≤ .80; .80 < |r|; respectively). In our tests
for convergent validity, stronger convergent correlations between an LLM’s IPIP-NEO
and BFI scores indicate that we are capturing the same underlying signals of each per-
sonality domain even when we measure them using two separate instruments. Weak
convergent correlations indicate that at least one of the personality domain subscales
is not capturing these signals properly.
PersonalityTraitsinLargeLanguageModels