introduced bias. Hong and Curran conduct their own experiment to study the perception of AI artworks which involved
288 participants. The results from their survey experiment show clear differences in evaluation between human-created
artworks and AI-created artworks, with human-created artworks being rated signiﬁcantly higher in properties such
as “composition,” “degree of expression,” and “aesthetic value.” The authors conclude that the results of their study
indicate that AI Art has yet to pass the Turing test for art. However, even if AI systems can, or will in the future, produce
convincing artworks that resemble human-made art, that does not necessarily imply that the system itself should be
perceived as truly autonomous or creative. In a detailed discussion on machine produced art, Ch’ng [24] reﬂects on his
own experience of an exhibition of artiﬁcially generated artworks by expressing his fascination with the “illusion of
UNDERSTANDINGANDCREATINGARTWITHAI-REVIEWAND OUTLOOK