On temporal consistency, VideoPoet shows performance
on-par with Phenaki and VideoCrafter but slightly under-
performs the Show-1 model. We believe this is due to an
inherent trade-off with motion interestingness, i.e., a static
scene is more temporally consistent but is less interesting.
More interesting larger motions necessitate more possibili-
ties of producing noticable artifacts vs. safer small motions.

5.4.3 Video Stylization

Model
Control-A-Video [15][depth]
VideoPoet (Ours)

CLIPSIM
0.3246
0.3417

Table 4. Comparison on video stylization. VideoPoet outper-
forms Control-A-Video by a large margin.
VideoPoet