I t   w a s   n o t   c l e a r   w h e t h e r   H o l l i n g s w o r t h   h a d   a n   a t t o r n e y   w h o   c o u l d   c o m m e n t   o n   h i s   b e h a l f .   F e d e r a l   a u t h o r i t i e s   h a v e   o p e n e d   a   c i v i l   r i g h t s   i n v e s t i g a t i o n   a s   n e w   q u e s t i o n s   h a v e   s u r f a c e d   a b o u t   t h e   d e a t h   o f   a   B l a c k   m a n   a f t e r   a   h i g h - s p e e d   p o l i c e   c h a s e   i n   n o r t h e r n   L o u i s i a n a   l a s t   y e a r .   L o c a l   p r o s e c u t o r s   i n   U n i o n   P a r i s h   d e c i d e d   n o t   t o   b r i n g   a n y   c h a r g e s   a g a i n s t   t h e   r e s p o n d i n g   t r o o p e r s   b u t   r e f e r r e d   t h e   c a s e   t o   t h e   U . S .   J u s t i c e   D e p a r t m e n t .   T h e   a g e n c y   a l s o   r e c e n t l y   p l a c e d   o n   p a i d   l e a v e   M a s t e r   T r o o p e r   C h r i s   H o l l i n g s w o r t h ,   o n e   o f   s i x   t r o o p e r s   w h o   r e s p o n d e d   t o   t h e   c r a s h   s i t e .   W e   h a v e   t o   b e l i e v e   t h a t ,   f r o m   D a y   O n e ,   t h e   L o u i s i a n a   S t a t e   P o l i c e   w e r e   n o t   h o n e s t   w i t h   t h e   p u b l i c . T h e   t w o   g r a p h i c   p h o t o s     w h i c h   a p p e a r   t o   h a v e   b e e n   t a k e n   i n   a   m e d i c a l   s e t t i n g   a n d   s h o w   a p p a r e n t   b r u i s e s   a n d   c u t s   t o   G r e e n e s   f a c e   a n d   s c a l p     w e r e   p r o v i d e d   b y   h i s   f a m i l y   a n d   h a d   p r e v i o u s l y   b e e n   s h a r e d   o n   t h e i r   s o c i a l   m e d i a .
It was not clear whether Ricardo Brown had an attorney who could comment on his behalf.absolute no. There is no such thing as a U.S. Justice Department.
( z0 multi-sentence :snt ( z1 clear :ARG1 ( z2 have :ARG0 ( z3 person :name ( z4 name :op "Ricardo" :op "Brown" ) ) :ARG1 ( z5 attorney :ARG0-of ( z6 comment :ARG1-of ( z7 possible ) :beneficiary z3 ) ) ) :polarity - ) :snt ( z8 no :degree ( z9 absolute ) ) :snt ( z10 thing :domain ( z11 government-organization :name ( z12 name :op "U.S." :op "Justice" :op "Department" ) ) :polarity - ) )
(z0 / multi-sentence
    :snt1 (z1 / clear-06
              :ARG1 (z2 / have-03
                        :ARG0 (z3 / person
                                  :name (z4 / name
                                            :op1 "Ricardo"
                                            :op2 "Brown"))
                        :ARG1 (z5 / attorney
                                  :ARG0-of (z6 / comment-01
                                               :ARG1-of (z7 / possible-01)
                                               :beneficiary z3)))
              :polarity -)
    :snt2 (z8 / no
              :degree (z9 / absolute))
    :snt3 (z10 / thing
               :domain (z11 / government-organization
                            :name (z12 / name
                                       :op1 "U.S."
                                       :op2 "Justice"
                                       :op3 "Department"))
               :polarity -))
It was not clear whether Ricardo Brown had an attorney who could comment on his behalf . absolute no. There is no such thing as a U.S. Justice Department .
z1 :polarity 0
z4 :op1 5
z3 :name z4
z4 :op2 2
z2 :ARG0 z3
z1 :ARG1 z2
z2 :ARG1 z5
z6 :ARG1-of z7
z5 :ARG0-of z6
z6 :beneficiary z3
z0 :snt1 z1
z8 :degree z9
z0 :snt2 z8
z10 :polarity 1
z0 :snt3 z10
z12 :op1 6
z12 :op2 4
z11 :name z12
z10 :domain z11
z12 :op3 3