Ouster clauses that prevent judicial review have rarely been accepted by the courts, the opinion states. It also says that passages in the act that make ministers solely accountable to parliament and not the courts does not preclude a judicial review. Properly understood the secretary of states decision is contrary to the clear expressed intention of parliament. And if he is determined to pursue that aspect of his policy, I know my right honourable friend, he is a democrat  when will you bring it to the house for vote? Ministers seemed to have settled an internal legal debate on their powers last week when they said there was no requirement to stage a Commons vote on the cuts.
gdanny has a qqxxillion in her life.
( z0 have :ARG0 ( z1 person :name ( z2 name :op "nucleus" ) ) :ARG1 ( z3 monetary-quantity :quant 250000 :unit ( z4 dollar ) ) :time ( z5 live :ARG0 z1 ) )
(z0 / have-03
    :ARG0 (z1 / person
              :name (z2 / name
                        :op1 "nucleus"))
    :ARG1 (z3 / monetary-quantity
              :quant 250000
              :unit (z4 / dollar))
    :time (z5 / live-01
              :ARG0 z1))
gdanny has a qqxxillion in her life .
z1 :name z2
z2 :op1 1
z0 :ARG0 z1
z0 :ARG1 z3
z3 :unit z4
z3 :quant 0
z0 :time z5
z5 :ARG0 z1