Instead, I will go broad brush, knowing that nobody will agree with all of these evaluations. Especially when dealing with anonymous and uncorroborated allegations, due process to protect the privacy of all involved is critical. Theres still time. I could inundate you with detail. But is anybody indestructible anymore?
Anonymous and an uncorroided witness will not agree on most of the evaluations.
( z0 agree :ARG0 ( z1 and :op ( z2 anonymous ) :op ( z3 person :ARG0-of ( z4 witness ) :ARG1-of ( z5 secure :polarity - ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z6 evaluate :quant ( z7 most ) ) :polarity - )
(z0 / agree-01
    :ARG0 (z1 / and
              :op1 (z2 / anonymous)
              :op2 (z3 / person
                       :ARG0-of (z4 / witness-01)
                       :ARG1-of (z5 / secure-02
                                    :polarity -)))
    :ARG1 (z6 / evaluate-01
              :quant (z7 / most))
    :polarity -)
Anonymous and an uncorroided witness will not agree on most of the evaluations .
z1 :op1 z2
z5 :polarity 0
z3 :ARG1-of z5
z1 :op2 z3
z3 :ARG0-of z4
z0 :polarity 1
z0 :ARG0 z1
z6 :quant z7
z0 :ARG1 z6