Third, we should recognise also that there is no limit on the maximum number of peers in the House. The result is that all too often this leaves peers carrying the can for inaction. It takes away a fundamental check on power. It is absurd that its powers are only advisory. It would be tempting to call cronyism in the Lords an abuse of the system, but the system itself is fundamentally broken.
There is also no maximum amount ofLynites in the Lords.
( z0 person :quant ( z1 amount :mod ( z2 maximum :polarity - ) ) :ARG0-of ( z3 byline :ARG1 ( z4 ass ) ) :location ( z5 government-organization :name ( z6 name :op "Lords" ) ) :mod ( z7 also ) )
(z0 / person
    :quant (z1 / amount
               :mod (z2 / maximum
                        :polarity -))
    :ARG0-of (z3 / byline-91
                 :ARG1 (z4 / ass))
    :location (z5 / government-organization
                  :name (z6 / name
                            :op1 "Lords"))
    :mod (z7 / also))
There is also no maximum amount ofLynites in the Lords .
z2 :polarity 0
z1 :mod z2
z0 :quant z1
z0 :mod z7
z0 :ARG0-of z3
z3 :ARG1 z4
z0 :location z5
z5 :name z6
z6 :op1 1