Instead, I will go broad brush, knowing that nobody will agree with all of these evaluations. Especially when dealing with anonymous and uncorroborated allegations, due process to protect the privacy of all involved is critical. But is anybody indestructible anymore? I could inundate you with detail. Those determinations dont need to be made  indeed, shouldnt be made  today.
Someone who determines when anonymous and unobordable claims are assessed would be subject to a liability.
( z0 subject :ARG1 ( z1 someone :ARG0-of ( z2 determine :ARG1 ( z3 time :time-of ( z4 assess :ARG1 ( z5 claim :ARG1-of ( z6 afford :ARG1-of ( z7 possible :polarity - ) ) :mod ( z8 anonymous ) ) ) ) ) ) :ARG2 ( z9 liability ) )
(z0 / subject-01
    :ARG1 (z1 / someone
              :ARG0-of (z2 / determine-01
                           :ARG1 (z3 / time
                                     :time-of (z4 / assess-01
                                                  :ARG1 (z5 / claim-01
                                                            :ARG1-of (z6 / afford-01
                                                                         :ARG1-of (z7 / possible-01
                                                                                      :polarity -))
                                                            :mod (z8 / anonymous))))))
    :ARG2 (z9 / liability))
Someone who determines when anonymous and unobordable claims are assessed would be subject to a liability .
z1 :ARG0-of z2
z2 :ARG1 z3
z6 :ARG1-of z7
z7 :polarity 0
z5 :ARG1-of z6
z5 :mod z8
z4 :ARG1 z5
z3 :time-of z4
z0 :ARG1 z1
z0 :ARG2 z9