But then she doubled down. What changed between Tuesday and Thursday? Let the process unfold, South Dakota Gov. I think everything should be on the table, Graham replied. Wp Get the full experience.
The narrator thinks everything cannot be perfect, therefore the hypothesis about the weakness of the previous government is divided from the “full” conclusion.
( z0 think :ARG0 ( z1 person :ARG0-of ( z2 narrate ) ) :ARG0-of ( z3 cause :ARG1 ( z4 divide :ARG1 ( z5 thing :ARG1-of ( z6 hypothesize :topic ( z7 weak :ARG1 ( z8 government-organization :ARG0-of ( z9 govern ) :time ( z10 previous ) ) ) ) ) :ARG2 ( z11 thing :ARG1-of ( z12 conclude ) ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z13 possible :ARG1 ( z14 perfect :ARG1 ( z15 everything ) ) :polarity - ) )
(z0 / think-01
    :ARG0 (z1 / person
              :ARG0-of (z2 / narrate-01))
    :ARG0-of (z3 / cause-01
                 :ARG1 (z4 / divide-02
                           :ARG1 (z5 / thing
                                     :ARG1-of (z6 / hypothesize-01
                                                  :topic (z7 / weak-02
                                                             :ARG1 (z8 / government-organization
                                                                       :ARG0-of (z9 / govern-01)
                                                                       :time (z10 / previous)))))
                           :ARG2 (z11 / thing
                                      :ARG1-of (z12 / conclude-01))))
    :ARG1 (z13 / possible-01
               :ARG1 (z14 / perfect-02
                          :ARG1 (z15 / everything))
               :polarity -))
The narrator thinks everything cannot be perfect , therefore the hypothesis about the weakness of the previous government is divided from the " full” conclusion .
z1 :ARG0-of z2
z0 :ARG0 z1
z0 :ARG1 z13
z13 :polarity 0
z13 :ARG1 z14
z14 :ARG1 z15
z0 :ARG0-of z3
z5 :ARG1-of z6
z6 :topic z7
z8 :time z10
z7 :ARG1 z8
z8 :ARG0-of z9
z4 :ARG1 z5
z3 :ARG1 z4
z4 :ARG2 z11
z11 :ARG1-of z12