The problem is exacerbated by the almost furtive way in which the project has been set up. Rarely, though, do we have an open debate about this, an honest public conversation about the good and the bad. Most people would probably say yes. The project, the opt-out and the deadline have all barely been publicised. I certainly would.
permercieves have definitely set up an open debate about the issue.
( z0 set-up :ARG0 ( z1 person :ARG0-of ( z2 perceive ) ) :ARG1 ( z3 debate :ARG1 ( z4 issue ) :ARG1-of ( z5 open ) ) :mod ( z6 definite ) )
(z0 / set-up-03
    :ARG0 (z1 / person
              :ARG0-of (z2 / perceive-01))
    :ARG1 (z3 / debate-01
              :ARG1 (z4 / issue)
              :ARG1-of (z5 / open-04))
    :mod (z6 / definite))
permercieves have definitely set up an open debate about the issue .
z1 :ARG0-of z2
z0 :mod z6
z0 :ARG0 z1
z3 :ARG1-of z5
z0 :ARG1 z3
z3 :ARG1 z4