Is this what the public expect in the third decade of the 21st century? No 10 has been approached for comment. It simply adds to the impression that the choice of peers is the exclusive preserve of No 10  and the less publicity the better. The result is that all too often this leaves peers carrying the can for inaction. 'The commission has completed its vetting in respect of all nominees.
The commission is made of 1 woman 1 man 20 a man.
( z0 make :ARG1 ( z1 commission ) :cxnsistof ( z2 and :op ( z3 man :quant 1 ) :op ( z4 man :quant 20 ) ) :rel ( z5 woman :quant 1 ) )
(z0 / make-01
    :ARG1 (z1 / commission)
    :consist-of (z2 / and
                    :op1 (z3 / man
                             :quant 1)
                    :op2 (z4 / man
                             :quant 20))
    :rel (z5 / woman
             :quant 1))
The commission is made of 1 woman 1 man 20 a man .
z0 :ARG1 z1
z5 :quant 0
z3 :quant 1
z4 :quant 2
z2 :op2 z4
z2 :op1 z3
z0 :consist-of z2
z0 :rel z5