So whats the gist? No. Thought youd never ask. A rose by any other name would smell as sweet. And rule-breaking by any other name is still rule-breaking.
So co’s phone calling in that name should have been no call.
( z0 cause :ARG1 ( z1 recommend :ARG1 ( z2 call :ARG1 ( z3 phone ) ) :polarity - ) :rel ( z4 bank :ARG1-of ( z5 name :ARG2 ( z6 that ) ) ) :rel ( z7 call :ARG0 ( z8 company :name ( z9 name ) ) :ARG1 z3 ) )
(z0 / cause-01
    :ARG1 (z1 / recommend-01
              :ARG1 (z2 / call-02
                        :ARG1 (z3 / phone))
              :polarity -)
    :rel (z4 / bank
             :ARG1-of (z5 / name-01
                          :ARG2 (z6 / that)))
    :rel (z7 / call-02
             :ARG0 (z8 / company
                       :name (z9 / name))
             :ARG1 z3))
So co’s phone calling in that name should have been no call .
z8 :name z9
z7 :ARG1 z3
z7 :ARG0 z8
z5 :ARG2 z6
z4 :ARG1-of z5
z0 :ARG1 z1
z1 :polarity 0
z1 :ARG1 z2
z2 :ARG1 z3
z0 :rel z4
z0 :rel z7