Please make sure your browser supports JavaScript and cookies and that you are not blocking them from loading. For more information you can review our Terms of Service and Cookie Policy. So while it sounds nice, it just doesn't work in practice." This was a double vulnerability. Why did this happen?
Microsoft has developed a way to block non-cystables from accessing to certain windows files.
( z0 develop :ARG0 ( z1 company :name ( z2 name :op "Microsoft" ) ) :ARG1 ( z3 way :manner-of ( z4 block :ARG0 z1 :ARG1 ( z5 cyber :polarity - ) :ARG2 ( z6 access :ARG1 ( z7 file :mod ( z8 window ) :mod ( z9 certain ) ) ) ) ) )
(z0 / develop-02
    :ARG0 (z1 / company
              :name (z2 / name
                        :op1 "Microsoft"))
    :ARG1 (z3 / way
              :manner-of (z4 / block-01
                             :ARG0 z1
                             :ARG1 (z5 / cyber
                                       :polarity -)
                             :ARG2 (z6 / access-01
                                       :ARG1 (z7 / file
                                                 :mod (z8 / window)
                                                 :mod (z9 / certain))))))
Microsoft has developed a way to block non - cystables from accessing to certain windows files .
z1 :name z2
z2 :op1 1
z0 :ARG0 z1
z0 :ARG1 z3
z3 :manner-of z4
z4 :ARG0 z1
z5 :polarity 0
z4 :ARG1 z5
z4 :ARG2 z6
z7 :mod z8
z7 :mod z9
z6 :ARG1 z7