Yet Saez and Zucman decided to simply leave them out of their analysis. No, no chance. Fair is good. It's hard to overstate how nonsensical this comparison is (which is perhaps why it's never been done before). I dont keep cash in the bank.
>Thieves and saes chose to not compare to another group of people.
( z0 choose :ARG0 ( z1 and :op ( z2 person :ARG0-of ( z3 steal ) ) :op ( z4 person :ARG0-of ( z5 steal ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z6 compare :ARG1 z1 :ARG2 ( z7 group :cxnsistof ( z8 person ) :mod ( z9 another ) ) :polarity - ) )
(z0 / choose-01
    :ARG0 (z1 / and
              :op1 (z2 / person
                       :ARG0-of (z3 / steal-01))
              :op2 (z4 / person
                       :ARG0-of (z5 / steal-01)))
    :ARG1 (z6 / compare-01
              :ARG1 z1
              :ARG2 (z7 / group
                        :consist-of (z8 / person)
                        :mod (z9 / another))
              :polarity -))
>Thieves and saes chose to not compare to another group of people .
z2 :ARG0-of z3
z1 :op1 z2
z1 :op2 z4
z4 :ARG0-of z5
z0 :ARG0 z1
z6 :polarity 0
z0 :ARG1 z6
z6 :ARG1 z1
z7 :mod z9
z6 :ARG2 z7
z7 :consist-of z8