Cahill interviewed the seven jurors over Zoom Wednesday morning and was only satisfied that five of them could still serve as fair and impartial in the trial. However Cahill dismissed the prospective juror saying the man 'clearly fell within the case law of police credibility'. 'Whether you are under the influence of drugs doesn't determine whether you should be living or dead,' he said. Cahill interviewed the seven jurors already selected Wednesday morning and was only satisfied that five of them could still serve as fair and impartial in the trial of the former Minneapolis police officer. 'You don't just dirty up someone who has died in these circumstances as a defense,' he said.
Cahill vacated his opinion about the case-law votes.
( z0 vacate :ARG0 ( z1 person :name ( z2 name :op "Cahill" ) ) :ARG1 ( z3 thing :ARG1-of ( z4 opine :ARG0 z1 ) :topic ( z5 vote :mod ( z6 law :mod ( z7 case ) ) ) ) )
(z0 / vacate-01
    :ARG0 (z1 / person
              :name (z2 / name
                        :op1 "Cahill"))
    :ARG1 (z3 / thing
              :ARG1-of (z4 / opine-01
                           :ARG0 z1)
              :topic (z5 / vote-01
                         :mod (z6 / law
                                  :mod (z7 / case-03)))))
Cahill vacated his opinion about the case - law votes .
z1 :name z2
z2 :op1 0
z0 :ARG0 z1
z0 :ARG1 z3
z3 :ARG1-of z4
z4 :ARG0 z1
z6 :mod z7
z5 :mod z6
z3 :topic z5