And I called him, and he didnt tell me that. I think he just misunderstood the question, probably.' The results of that study have also not yet undergone peer review. I saw the statement. Its just incorrect information.
the move could potentially not be seen as the written statement due to the lack of Sodium Saccharin  in the backgrounds.
( z0 possible :ARG1 ( z1 see :ARG1 ( z2 move ) :ARG2 ( z3 thing :ARG1-of ( z4 write ) :ARG1-of ( z5 state ) ) :mod ( z6 potential ) :polarity - ) :ARG1-of ( z7 cause :ARG0 ( z8 lack :ARG1 ( z9 small-molecule :name ( z10 name :op "Sodium" :op "Saccharin" ) ) :location ( z11 background ) ) ) )
(z0 / possible-01
    :ARG1 (z1 / see-01
              :ARG1 (z2 / move-02)
              :ARG2 (z3 / thing
                        :ARG1-of (z4 / write-01)
                        :ARG1-of (z5 / state-01))
              :mod (z6 / potential)
              :polarity -)
    :ARG1-of (z7 / cause-01
                 :ARG0 (z8 / lack-01
                           :ARG1 (z9 / small-molecule
                                     :name (z10 / name
                                                :op1 "Sodium"
                                                :op2 "Saccharin"))
                           :location (z11 / background))))
the move could potentially not be seen as the written statement due to the lack of Sodium Saccharin in the backgrounds .
z1 :polarity 0
z1 :mod z6
z0 :ARG1 z1
z1 :ARG1 z2
z3 :ARG1-of z4
z1 :ARG2 z3
z3 :ARG1-of z5
z0 :ARG1-of z7
z7 :ARG0 z8
z8 :ARG1 z9
z9 :name z10
z10 :op1 2
z10 :op2 1
z8 :location z11