Especially when dealing with anonymous and uncorroborated allegations, due process to protect the privacy of all involved is critical. They also highlighted the complicated and delicate dynamics of handling sexual misconduct allegations  in this case, one involving an anonymous accusation and a public figure. Instead, I will go broad brush, knowing that nobody will agree with all of these evaluations. But is anybody indestructible anymore? There seemed an orderliness to it all.
Art experts determined that nobody would agree with those privacy violations
( z0 determine :ARG0 ( z1 person :ARG1-of ( z2 expert :ARG2 ( z3 art ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z4 agree :ARG0 ( z5 nobody ) :ARG1 ( z6 violate :ARG1 ( z7 privacy ) :mod ( z8 that ) ) ) )
(z0 / determine-01
    :ARG0 (z1 / person
              :ARG1-of (z2 / expert-01
                           :ARG2 (z3 / art)))
    :ARG1 (z4 / agree-01
              :ARG0 (z5 / nobody)
              :ARG1 (z6 / violate-01
                        :ARG1 (z7 / privacy)
                        :mod (z8 / that))))
Art experts determined that nobody would agree with those privacy violations
z1 :ARG1-of z2
z2 :ARG2 z3
z0 :ARG0 z1
z4 :ARG0 z5
z0 :ARG1 z4
z6 :ARG1 z7
z6 :mod z8
z4 :ARG1 z6