As we have just seen, its recommendations can be overridden by No 10. Is this what the public expect in the third decade of the 21st century? Third, we should recognise also that there is no limit on the maximum number of peers in the House. There is, for example, a wide range of select committees that draw on the experience of peers who have often worked in the areas they are examining: one example is Martha Lane Foxs new Covid-19 committee, which has been set up to consider the long-term implications of the pandemic. Second, we should recognise that, as long as freedom to appoint lies in the hands of prime ministers  any prime minister  we need at the very least an effective checking system.
Third, we should require appointed committees to consider the consequences of an announced ordinance.
( z0 recommend :li 3 :ARG1 ( z1 require :ARG0 ( z2 we ) :ARG1 ( z3 consider :ARG0 ( z4 committee :ARG1-of ( z5 appoint ) ) :ARG1 ( z6 consequence :ARG1 ( z7 ordinance :ARG1-of ( z8 announce ) ) ) ) :ARG2 z4 ) )
(z0 / recommend-01
    :li 3
    :ARG1 (z1 / require-01
              :ARG0 (z2 / we)
              :ARG1 (z3 / consider-02
                        :ARG0 (z4 / committee
                                  :ARG1-of (z5 / appoint-01))
                        :ARG1 (z6 / consequence-03
                                  :ARG1 (z7 / ordinance
                                            :ARG1-of (z8 / announce-01))))
              :ARG2 z4))
Third , we should require appointed committees to consider the consequences of an announced ordinance .
z0 :li 0
z0 :ARG1 z1
z1 :ARG0 z2
z4 :ARG1-of z5
z1 :ARG2 z4
z3 :ARG0 z4
z1 :ARG1 z3
z3 :ARG1 z6
z7 :ARG1-of z8
z6 :ARG1 z7