How far one has fallen." We believe in the presumption of innocence and due process and thats why we end up being right so often." We believe in the presumption of innocence. "We wont do it. "We are consistent.
The statement does not presume that the Presenter is unconquered.
( z0 presume :ARG0 ( z1 thing :ARG1-of ( z2 state ) ) :ARG1 ( z3 conquer :ARG1 ( z4 person :ARG0-of ( z5 have-org-role :ARG2 ( z6 president ) ) ) :polarity - ) :polarity - )
(z0 / presume-01
    :ARG0 (z1 / thing
              :ARG1-of (z2 / state-01))
    :ARG1 (z3 / conquer-01
              :ARG1 (z4 / person
                        :ARG0-of (z5 / have-org-role-91
                                     :ARG2 (z6 / president)))
              :polarity -)
    :polarity -)
The statement does not presume that the Presenter is unconquered .
z1 :ARG1-of z2
z0 :polarity 0
z0 :ARG0 z1
z4 :ARG0-of z5
z5 :ARG2 z6
z3 :ARG1 z4
z0 :ARG1 z3
z3 :polarity 1