???? Is this a You cant say, but I can kind of thing?? J-E-W-S, according to the Washington Examiner. So, the figure wasnt six million after all?? I dont want to retweet it because I dont want to help spread it.
The figure was not 59001+2 people according to the wikipedia entry.
( z0 say :ARG0 ( z1 entry :part-of ( z2 publication :name ( z3 name :op "Wikipedia" ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z4 person :quant ( z5 sum-of :op 59001 :op 2 ) :domain ( z6 figure ) :polarity - ) )
(z0 / say-01
    :ARG0 (z1 / entry
              :part-of (z2 / publication
                           :name (z3 / name
                                     :op1 "Wikipedia")))
    :ARG1 (z4 / person
              :quant (z5 / sum-of
                         :op1 59001
                         :op2 2)
              :domain (z6 / figure)
              :polarity -))
The figure was not 59001 +2 people according to the wikipedia entry .
z5 :op1 2
z5 :op2 1
z4 :quant z5
z4 :polarity 0
z4 :domain z6
z0 :ARG1 z4
z2 :name z3
z3 :op1 3
z1 :part-of z2
z0 :ARG0 z1