There was nothing Arlington could have done that would have been enough to convince us.GiftOutline Gift Article GiftOutline Gift Article Dr. In an FAQ published online, Alexandria officials wrote that operational considerations drove the decision to stick with six feet. And that we cant wait to see you in the fall.GiftOutline Gift Article
Still online received the clarity needed to conclude that whatever else could have done the job of defending one's self-appointed claim, in the case cited here,achers in another physically remote hospital could have voted to ignore plaintiffs' offers of proof.
( z0 multi-sentence :snt ( z1 receive :ARG0 ( z2 online :mod ( z3 still ) ) :ARG1 ( z4 clear :ARG1-of ( z5 need :purpose ( z6 conclude :ARG0 z2 :ARG1 ( z7 possible :ARG1 ( z8 do :ARG0 ( z9 whatever :mod ( z10 else ) ) :ARG1 ( z11 job :cxnsistof ( z12 defend :ARG1 ( z13 claim :ARG0 ( z14 one ) :ARG2-of ( z15 appoint :ARG1 z14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) :snt ( z16 possible :ARG1 ( z17 vote :ARG0 ( z18 person :ARG0-of ( z19 achieve :location ( z20 hospital :mod ( z21 remote :degree ( z22 physical ) ) :mod ( z23 another ) ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z24 ignore :ARG0 z18 :ARG1 ( z25 offer :ARG0 ( z26 person :ARG0-of ( z27 sue ) ) :ARG1 ( z28 prove :ARG0 z26 ) ) ) ) :prep-in ( z29 case :ARG1-of ( z30 cite :location ( z31 here ) ) ) ) )
(z0 / multi-sentence
    :snt1 (z1 / receive-01
              :ARG0 (z2 / online
                        :mod (z3 / still))
              :ARG1 (z4 / clear-08
                        :ARG1-of (z5 / need-01
                                     :purpose (z6 / conclude-01
                                                  :ARG0 z2
                                                  :ARG1 (z7 / possible-01
                                                            :ARG1 (z8 / do-02
                                                                      :ARG0 (z9 / whatever
                                                                                :mod (z10 / else))
                                                                      :ARG1 (z11 / job
                                                                                 :consist-of (z12 / defend-01
                                                                                                  :ARG1 (z13 / claim-01
                                                                                                             :ARG0 (z14 / one)
                                                                                                             :ARG2-of (z15 / appoint-01
                                                                                                                           :ARG1 z14))))))))))
    :snt2 (z16 / possible-01
               :ARG1 (z17 / vote-01
                          :ARG0 (z18 / person
                                     :ARG0-of (z19 / achieve-01
                                                   :location (z20 / hospital
                                                                  :mod (z21 / remote
                                                                            :degree (z22 / physical))
                                                                  :mod (z23 / another))))
                          :ARG1 (z24 / ignore-01
                                     :ARG0 z18
                                     :ARG1 (z25 / offer-01
                                                :ARG0 (z26 / person
                                                           :ARG0-of (z27 / sue-02))
                                                :ARG1 (z28 / prove-01
                                                           :ARG0 z26))))
               :prep-in (z29 / case-03
                             :ARG1-of (z30 / cite-01
                                           :location (z31 / here)))))
Still online received the clarity needed to conclude that whatever else could have done the job of defending one 's self - appointed claim , in the case cited here , achers in another physically remote hospital could have voted to ignore plaintiffs ' offers of proof .
z2 :mod z3
z1 :ARG0 z2
z1 :ARG1 z4
z4 :ARG1-of z5
z5 :purpose z6
z6 :ARG0 z2
z9 :mod z10
z6 :ARG1 z7
z7 :ARG1 z8
z8 :ARG0 z9
z8 :ARG1 z11
z11 :consist-of z12
z15 :ARG1 z14
z13 :ARG2-of z15
z13 :ARG0 z14
z12 :ARG1 z13
z0 :snt1 z1
z29 :ARG1-of z30
z30 :location z31
z18 :ARG0-of z19
z21 :degree z22
z20 :mod z21
z20 :mod z23
z19 :location z20
z16 :prep-in z29
z0 :snt2 z16
z16 :ARG1 z17
z17 :ARG0 z18
z17 :ARG1 z24
z24 :ARG0 z18
z26 :ARG0-of z27
z25 :ARG0 z26
z24 :ARG1 z25
z25 :ARG1 z28
z28 :ARG0 z26