Rarely, though, do we have an open debate about this, an honest public conversation about the good and the bad. One might have thought that such joined-up thinking already exists. Thats not too much to ask, is it? I certainly would. That raises a few red flags.
The debate is on whether the scantily funded research is worth taking.
( z0 debate :ARG1 ( z1 truth-value :polarity-of ( z2 worth :ARG1 ( z3 research :ARG1-of ( z4 fund :ARG1-of ( z5 scant ) ) ) :ARG2 ( z6 take :ARG1 z3 ) ) ) )
(z0 / debate-01
    :ARG1 (z1 / truth-value
              :polarity-of (z2 / worth-02
                               :ARG1 (z3 / research-01
                                         :ARG1-of (z4 / fund-01
                                                      :ARG1-of (z5 / scant-02)))
                               :ARG2 (z6 / take-01
                                         :ARG1 z3))))
The debate is on whether the scantily funded research is worth taking .
z0 :ARG1 z1
z4 :ARG1-of z5
z3 :ARG1-of z4
z2 :ARG1 z3
z1 :polarity-of z2
z2 :ARG2 z6
z6 :ARG1 z3