Instead, I will go broad brush, knowing that nobody will agree with all of these evaluations. Because like I said, hes going to be here, and I want him here.But who will be with him? Those determinations dont need to be made  indeed, shouldnt be made  today. So lets just get this right.Its June now. But is anybody indestructible anymore?
he will be here:and i want him here. But who will be with him? Those determinations dont have to be made  indeed, will last known indeterminations.
( z0 multi-sentence :snt ( z1 and :op ( z2 here :location-of ( z3 he ) ) :op ( z4 want :ARG0 ( z5 i ) :ARG1 z2 ) ) :snt ( z6 contrast :ARG2 ( z7 accompany :ARG0 ( z8 amr-unknown ) :ARG1 z3 ) ) :snt ( z9 obligate :ARG1 ( z10 thing :ARG1-of ( z11 determine ) :ARG1-of ( z12 know ) :mod ( z13 that ) :ord ( z14 ordinal-entity :value -1 ) ) :mod ( z15 indeed ) :polarity - ) )
(z0 / multi-sentence
    :snt1 (z1 / and
              :op1 (z2 / here
                       :location-of (z3 / he))
              :op2 (z4 / want-01
                       :ARG0 (z5 / i)
                       :ARG1 z2))
    :snt2 (z6 / contrast-01
              :ARG2 (z7 / accompany-01
                        :ARG0 (z8 / amr-unknown)
                        :ARG1 z3))
    :snt3 (z9 / obligate-01
              :ARG1 (z10 / thing
                         :ARG1-of (z11 / determine-01)
                         :ARG1-of (z12 / know-01)
                         :mod (z13 / that)
                         :ord (z14 / ordinal-entity
                                   :value -1))
              :mod (z15 / indeed)
              :polarity -))
he will be here : and i want him here . But who will be with him ? Those determinations dont have to be made indeed , will last known indeterminations .
z2 :location-of z3
z1 :op1 z2
z4 :ARG0 z5
z1 :op2 z4
z4 :ARG1 z2
z7 :ARG0 z8
z6 :ARG2 z7
z7 :ARG1 z3
z0 :snt2 z6
z0 :snt1 z1
z10 :mod z13
z10 :ARG1-of z11
z9 :polarity 0
z9 :ARG1 z10
z0 :snt3 z9
z9 :mod z15
z10 :ord z14
z14 :value 1
z10 :ARG1-of z12