We have held the line and held it strongly." The Senate Economics Legislation Committee has been scrutinizing the bill since it was introduced in Parliament in December. The committee accepts that there remains the possibility that not all risks have been taken into account, and that further refinement may be needed to the arbitration mechanism and other parts of the code so that they work in an optimum manner, the report said. But the committee also recognized that the legislation carried risks and should be reviewed after a year. Parliament is scheduled to consider the bill on Tuesday and the conservative government hopes it will be approved during the next two-week sitting.
The Economist said something in the Senate economics committee regarding the risks of the bill.
( z0 say :ARG0 ( z1 magazine :name ( z2 name :op "The" :op "Economist" ) ) :ARG1 ( z3 something :topic ( z4 risk :ARG1 ( z5 bill ) ) ) :location ( z6 committee :location ( z7 government-organization :name ( z8 name :op "economics" ) ) :part-of ( z9 government-organization :name ( z10 name :op "Senate" ) ) ) )
(z0 / say-01
    :ARG0 (z1 / magazine
              :name (z2 / name
                        :op1 "The"
                        :op2 "Economist"))
    :ARG1 (z3 / something
              :topic (z4 / risk-01
                         :ARG1 (z5 / bill)))
    :location (z6 / committee
                  :location (z7 / government-organization
                                :name (z8 / name
                                          :op1 "economics"))
                  :part-of (z9 / government-organization
                               :name (z10 / name
                                          :op1 "Senate"))))
The Economist said something in the Senate economics committee regarding the risks of the bill .
z2 :op1 2
z1 :name z2
z2 :op2 0
z0 :ARG0 z1
z0 :ARG1 z3
z7 :name z8
z9 :name z10
z10 :op1 1
z8 :op1 3
z6 :part-of z9
z6 :location z7
z0 :location z6
z3 :topic z4
z4 :ARG1 z5