I know what the error was  incompetence. The departments position has not changed based on the statement made by the valuer. Although the valuer had discussed the possible need to apply a premium in certain circumstances, the auditor general has now talked to Colliers, which says the way the department used the advice was not reasonable. Instead, the department took the top of the band and added about 20%. Colliers said the way the department used its valuation was not reasonable.The department took the highest valuation that Colliers recommended and then added a premium of about 20% on top of that.
The department added over 3% on top of another unclear amount of graced ratings.
( z0 add :ARG0 ( z1 department ) :ARG1 ( z2 over :op ( z3 percentage-entity :value 3 ) ) :prep-in-addition-to ( z4 amount :ARG1-of ( z5 clear :polarity - ) :mod ( z6 another ) :quant-of ( z7 rate :ARG1-of ( z8 disgrace ) ) ) )
(z0 / add-02
    :ARG0 (z1 / department)
    :ARG1 (z2 / over
              :op1 (z3 / percentage-entity
                       :value 3))
    :prep-in-addition-to (z4 / amount
                             :ARG1-of (z5 / clear-06
                                          :polarity -)
                             :mod (z6 / another)
                             :quant-of (z7 / rate-01
                                           :ARG1-of (z8 / disgrace-01))))
The department added over 3 % on top of another unclear amount of graced ratings .
z0 :ARG0 z1
z0 :ARG1 z2
z3 :value 1
z2 :op1 z3
z5 :polarity 0
z4 :ARG1-of z5
z4 :mod z6
z0 :prep-in-addition-to z4
z7 :ARG1-of z8
z4 :quant-of z7