But do we have a very good response if this is not the fact? When it was pointed out to Dubi that for journalists covering news it was impossible to predict movements so precisely, he said there could be no exceptions. Absolutely. Reporting by Sakura Murakami; Editing by Alison WilliamsOur Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. Yes.
If we have a very good response to questions posed by others we also have to ensure that we get the facts right.
( z0 obligate :ARG1 ( z1 we ) :ARG2 ( z2 ensure :ARG0 z1 :ARG1 ( z3 get :ARG0 z1 :ARG1 ( z4 fact :ARG2-of ( z5 right ) ) ) ) :condition ( z6 have :ARG0 z1 :ARG1 ( z7 respond :ARG0 z1 :ARG1 ( z8 question :ARG1-of ( z9 pose :ARG0 ( z10 other ) ) ) :ARG1-of ( z11 good :degree ( z12 very ) ) ) ) :mod ( z13 also ) )
(z0 / obligate-01
    :ARG1 (z1 / we)
    :ARG2 (z2 / ensure-01
              :ARG0 z1
              :ARG1 (z3 / get-30
                        :ARG0 z1
                        :ARG1 (z4 / fact
                                  :ARG2-of (z5 / right-06))))
    :condition (z6 / have-03
                   :ARG0 z1
                   :ARG1 (z7 / respond-01
                             :ARG0 z1
                             :ARG1 (z8 / question-01
                                       :ARG1-of (z9 / pose-02
                                                    :ARG0 (z10 / other)))
                             :ARG1-of (z11 / good-02
                                           :degree (z12 / very))))
    :mod (z13 / also))
If we have a very good response to questions posed by others we also have to ensure that we get the facts right .
z6 :ARG0 z1
z11 :degree z12
z7 :ARG1-of z11
z6 :ARG1 z7
z7 :ARG0 z1
z7 :ARG1 z8
z8 :ARG1-of z9
z9 :ARG0 z10
z0 :mod z13
z0 :condition z6
z0 :ARG1 z1
z0 :ARG2 z2
z2 :ARG0 z1
z2 :ARG1 z3
z3 :ARG0 z1
z3 :ARG1 z4
z4 :ARG2-of z5