Yes, he was sometimes inartful, and sometimes inelegant, but he refused to waver. What is most notable, however, is how he is different, and what he accomplished because of it. Hes not too far off the mark. Arguably, there never was. He folded, and got nothing besides a few days of attention and chaos, it concluded.
Hes not too far off the mark. Arguably, there never was. He folded, and got nothing achieve.
( z0 multi-sentence :rel - :snt ( z1 have-degree :ARG1 ( z2 he ) :ARG2 ( z3 far :polarity - ) :ARG3 ( z4 too ) :ARG5 ( z5 off :op ( z6 mark ) ) ) :snt ( z7 ever ) :snt ( z8 and :ARG1-of ( z9 argue ) :op ( z10 fold :ARG1 ( z11 he ) ) :op ( z12 get :ARG0 z11 :ARG1 ( z13 achieve :ARG0 z11 :ARG1 ( z14 nothing ) ) ) ) )
(z0 / multi-sentence
    :rel -
    :snt1 (z1 / have-degree-91
              :ARG1 (z2 / he)
              :ARG2 (z3 / far
                        :polarity -)
              :ARG3 (z4 / too)
              :ARG5 (z5 / off
                        :op1 (z6 / mark)))
    :snt2 (z7 / ever)
    :snt3 (z8 / and
              :ARG1-of (z9 / argue-01)
              :op1 (z10 / fold-06
                        :ARG1 (z11 / he))
              :op2 (z12 / get-01
                        :ARG0 z11
                        :ARG1 (z13 / achieve-01
                                   :ARG0 z11
                                   :ARG1 (z14 / nothing)))))
Hes not too far off the mark . Arguably , there never was . He folded , and got nothing achieve .
z1 :ARG1 z2
z1 :ARG3 z4
z1 :ARG2 z3
z3 :polarity 0
z1 :ARG5 z5
z5 :op1 z6
z0 :snt2 z7
z0 :snt1 z1
z10 :ARG1 z11
z8 :op1 z10
z0 :snt3 z8
z8 :ARG1-of z9
z8 :op2 z12
z12 :ARG0 z11
z13 :ARG1 z14
z12 :ARG1 z13
z13 :ARG0 z11
z0 :rel 1