Especially when dealing with anonymous and uncorroborated allegations, due process to protect the privacy of all involved is critical. They also highlighted the complicated and delicate dynamics of handling sexual misconduct allegations  in this case, one involving an anonymous accusation and a public figure. Instead, I will go broad brush, knowing that nobody will agree with all of these evaluations. But is anybody indestructible anymore? There seemed an orderliness to it all.
Both auxiliance and privacy is important for the anonymous and unidentified accusations.
( z0 important :ARG0 ( z1 accuse :ARG1-of ( z2 identify :polarity - ) :mod ( z3 anonymous ) ) :ARG1 ( z4 and :op ( z5 assist ) :op ( z6 private ) ) )
(z0 / important-01
    :ARG0 (z1 / accuse-01
              :ARG1-of (z2 / identify-01
                           :polarity -)
              :mod (z3 / anonymous))
    :ARG1 (z4 / and
              :op1 (z5 / assist-01)
              :op2 (z6 / private-02)))
Both auxiliance and privacy is important for the anonymous and unidentified accusations .
z4 :op1 z5
z4 :op2 z6
z0 :ARG1 z4
z2 :polarity 0
z1 :ARG1-of z2
z1 :mod z3
z0 :ARG0 z1