I dont keep cash in the bank. Yet Saez and Zucman decided to simply leave them out of their analysis. Fair is good. No, no chance. However, in an article last month, Cuban ruled out any potential run for public office.
I dont keep cash in the bank. Yet Saez and Novacran decided to simply leave them out. Warriors chose to simply ignore. Fair is good. No, no chance. However, in an article last month, wasted concluded they're going to run for office.
( z0 multi-sentence :rel ( z1 choose :ARG0 ( z2 person :ARG0-of ( z3 have-org-role :ARG1 ( z4 team :name ( z5 name :op "Warriors" ) ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z6 ignore :ARG0 z2 :ARG1-of ( z7 simple ) ) ) :snt ( z8 have-concession :ARG1 ( z9 decide :ARG0 ( z10 and :op ( z11 person :name ( z12 name :op "Saez" ) ) :op ( z13 person :name ( z14 name :op "Novacran" ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z15 leave-out :ARG1 z10 :ARG1-of ( z16 simple ) ) ) :ARG2 ( z17 keep :ARG0 ( z18 i ) :ARG1 ( z19 cash :location ( z20 bank ) ) :polarity - ) ) :snt ( z21 good :ARG1 ( z22 fair ) ) :snt ( z23 chance :polarity - ) :snt ( z24 contrast :ARG2 ( z25 conclude :ARG0 ( z26 person :ARG1-of ( z27 waste ) ) :ARG1 ( z28 run :ARG0 z26 :ARG1 ( z29 office ) ) :medium ( z30 article :time ( z31 month :mod ( z32 last ) ) ) ) ) )
(z0 / multi-sentence
    :rel (z1 / choose-01
             :ARG0 (z2 / person
                       :ARG0-of (z3 / have-org-role-91
                                    :ARG1 (z4 / team
                                              :name (z5 / name
                                                        :op1 "Warriors"))))
             :ARG1 (z6 / ignore-01
                       :ARG0 z2
                       :ARG1-of (z7 / simple-02)))
    :snt1 (z8 / have-concession-91
              :ARG1 (z9 / decide-01
                        :ARG0 (z10 / and
                                   :op1 (z11 / person
                                             :name (z12 / name
                                                        :op1 "Saez"))
                                   :op2 (z13 / person
                                             :name (z14 / name
                                                        :op1 "Novacran")))
                        :ARG1 (z15 / leave-out-03
                                   :ARG1 z10
                                   :ARG1-of (z16 / simple-02)))
              :ARG2 (z17 / keep-01
                         :ARG0 (z18 / i)
                         :ARG1 (z19 / cash
                                    :location (z20 / bank))
                         :polarity -))
    :snt2 (z21 / good-02
               :ARG1 (z22 / fair-01))
    :snt3 (z23 / chance-02
               :polarity -)
    :snt4 (z24 / contrast-01
               :ARG2 (z25 / conclude-01
                          :ARG0 (z26 / person
                                     :ARG1-of (z27 / waste-01))
                          :ARG1 (z28 / run-02
                                     :ARG0 z26
                                     :ARG1 (z29 / office))
                          :medium (z30 / article
                                       :time (z31 / month
                                                  :mod (z32 / last))))))
I dont keep cash in the bank . Yet Saez and Novacran decided to simply leave them out . Warriors chose to simply ignore . Fair is good . No , no chance . However , in an article last month , wasted concluded they 're going to run for office .
z17 :polarity 0
z17 :ARG0 z18
z17 :ARG1 z19
z19 :location z20
z8 :ARG2 z17
z11 :name z12
z12 :op1 3
z10 :op1 z11
z10 :op2 z13
z13 :name z14
z14 :op1 2
z9 :ARG0 z10
z8 :ARG1 z9
z15 :ARG1-of z16
z9 :ARG1 z15
z15 :ARG1 z10
z2 :ARG0-of z3
z3 :ARG1 z4
z4 :name z5
z5 :op1 4
z1 :ARG0 z2
z6 :ARG1-of z7
z1 :ARG1 z6
z6 :ARG0 z2
z21 :ARG1 z22
z0 :snt2 z21
z0 :snt1 z8
z23 :polarity 1
z0 :snt3 z23
z0 :snt4 z24
z31 :mod z32
z30 :time z31
z25 :medium z30
z24 :ARG2 z25
z25 :ARG0 z26
z26 :ARG1-of z27
z28 :ARG0 z26
z25 :ARG1 z28
z28 :ARG1 z29
z0 :rel z1