For more information you can review our Terms of Service and Cookie Policy. Please make sure your browser supports JavaScript and cookies and that you are not blocking them from loading. So while it sounds nice, it just doesn't work in practice." Why did this happen? This was a double vulnerability.
The remover mr.and mrs.subblockary outlined a limited timeshare with another browser.
( z0 outline :ARG0 ( z1 and :op ( z2 person :name ( z3 name :op "Mr." ) ) :op ( z4 person :name ( z5 name :op "Mr." :op "subblockary" ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z6 timeshare :ARG1-of ( z7 limit ) :accompanier ( z8 product :ARG0-of ( z9 browse ) :mod ( z10 another ) ) ) :rel ( z11 remover ) :rel ( z12 i ) )
(z0 / outline-01
    :ARG0 (z1 / and
              :op1 (z2 / person
                       :name (z3 / name
                                 :op1 "Mr."))
              :op2 (z4 / person
                       :name (z5 / name
                                 :op1 "Mr."
                                 :op2 "subblockary")))
    :ARG1 (z6 / timeshare
              :ARG1-of (z7 / limit-01)
              :accompanier (z8 / product
                               :ARG0-of (z9 / browse-01)
                               :mod (z10 / another)))
    :rel (z11 / remover)
    :rel (z12 / i))
The remover mr. and mrs . subblockary outlined a limited timeshare with another browser .
z3 :op1 0
z1 :op1 z2
z2 :name z3
z1 :op2 z4
z4 :name z5
z5 :op1 1
z5 :op2 2
z0 :ARG0 z1
z6 :ARG1-of z7
z0 :ARG1 z6
z8 :mod z10
z6 :accompanier z8
z8 :ARG0-of z9
z0 :rel z11
z0 :rel z12