Rarely, though, do we have an open debate about this, an honest public conversation about the good and the bad. The problem is exacerbated by the almost furtive way in which the project has been set up. Human rights groups have criticised the 30billion company for its involvement in controversial programmes and has accused it of failing to do due diligence on who it does business with. It has since won two more contracts worth a total 24million. I certainly would.
Contracts are being taken away from the good side of the debate.
( z0 take-away :ARG1 ( z1 contract ) :source ( z2 side :ARG1-of ( z3 good ) :part-of ( z4 debate ) ) )
(z0 / take-away-05
    :ARG1 (z1 / contract)
    :source (z2 / side
                :ARG1-of (z3 / good-02)
                :part-of (z4 / debate-01)))
Contracts are being taken away from the good side of the debate .
z0 :ARG1 z1
z2 :ARG1-of z3
z0 :source z2
z2 :part-of z4