Ouster clauses that prevent judicial review have rarely been accepted by the courts, the opinion states. Tory MPs involved in the rebellion say they have not been given any information about whether or when there will be a vote. Speaking in the Commons about the review, Mitchell said the government was in danger of breaking the law. Properly understood the secretary of states decision is contrary to the clear expressed intention of parliament. It also says that passages in the act that make ministers solely accountable to parliament and not the courts does not preclude a judicial review.
How can assurance be gained in the extraordinary senate of states?
( z0 possible :ARG1 ( z1 gain :ARG1 ( z2 assure ) :location ( z3 government-organization :name ( z4 name :op "Senate" ) :mod ( z5 extraordinary ) :mod ( z6 state ) ) :manner ( z7 amr-unknown ) ) )
(z0 / possible-01
    :ARG1 (z1 / gain-02
              :ARG1 (z2 / assure-01)
              :location (z3 / government-organization
                            :name (z4 / name
                                      :op1 "Senate")
                            :mod (z5 / extraordinary)
                            :mod (z6 / state))
              :manner (z7 / amr-unknown)))
How can assurance be gained in the extraordinary senate of states ?
z1 :ARG1 z2
z0 :ARG1 z1
z1 :manner z7
z3 :mod z5
z1 :location z3
z3 :name z4
z4 :op1 0
z3 :mod z6