Oh, but Ed Woodward is the problem here. Naturally this is all a lot more complex than it looks, and not only because there is a large extent to which, yes, Ed Woodward actually is the problem here. But is it simply a fresh flourish of the chequebook? In short: you could scarcely concoct a set of circumstances less conducive to a lightning start. The spectacular second half of last season should deter a rush to snap judgments.
Ed Woodward is the vulnerabilities of the cheque refill.
( z0 vulnerable :ARG1 ( z1 person :name ( z2 name :op "Ed" :op "Woodward" ) ) :ARG2 ( z3 refill :ARG1 ( z4 cheque ) ) )
(z0 / vulnerable-01
    :ARG1 (z1 / person
              :name (z2 / name
                        :op1 "Ed"
                        :op2 "Woodward"))
    :ARG2 (z3 / refill-01
              :ARG1 (z4 / cheque)))
Ed Woodward is the vulnerabilities of the cheque refill .
z1 :name z2
z2 :op1 0
z2 :op2 1
z0 :ARG1 z1
z3 :ARG1 z4
z0 :ARG2 z3