The result is that all too often this leaves peers carrying the can for inaction. No 10 has been approached for comment. It takes away a fundamental check on power. This situation cannot go on. 'It's never been more clear: there is one rule for the Conservatives and their chums, another for the rest of the country.'
The result is not clear if it is another name for the groups designated by the can.
( z0 clear :ARG0 ( z1 thing :ARG2-of ( z2 result ) ) :ARG1 ( z3 truth-value :polarity-of ( z4 name :beneficiary ( z5 group :ARG1-of ( z6 designate :ARG0 ( z7 can ) ) ) :domain ( z8 it ) :mod ( z9 another ) ) ) :polarity - )
(z0 / clear-06
    :ARG0 (z1 / thing
              :ARG2-of (z2 / result-01))
    :ARG1 (z3 / truth-value
              :polarity-of (z4 / name
                               :beneficiary (z5 / group
                                                :ARG1-of (z6 / designate-01
                                                             :ARG0 (z7 / can)))
                               :domain (z8 / it)
                               :mod (z9 / another)))
    :polarity -)
The result is not clear if it is another name for the groups designated by the can .
z1 :ARG2-of z2
z0 :polarity 0
z0 :ARG0 z1
z0 :ARG1 z3
z4 :mod z9
z4 :domain z8
z3 :polarity-of z4
z4 :beneficiary z5
z5 :ARG1-of z6
z6 :ARG0 z7