But I am glad that Silverman isnt opting for the straightforward mea culpa and is acknowledging the complexity of the situation. The ruling took into account several factors, including the uniqueness of the application, and the fact that there was a superabundance of space in the graveyard. But it's not far off, I'll just say that,' he said.  but in a broad sense, he is not wrong. I rarely find graveyards to be morbid.
But I is glad that Donald is not optixing for the straightforward mea culpa and is Ackning the complexity of the situation. The ruling took into an account several factors, including the fact that there was a superabundo of space in the representation.  But it's not barking.
( z0 multi-sentence :snt ( z1 contrast :ARG2 ( z2 glad :ARG0 ( z3 and :op ( z4 opt :ARG0 ( z5 person :name ( z6 name :op "Donald" ) ) :ARG1 ( z7 mea-culpa :mod ( z8 straightforward ) ) :polarity - ) :op ( z9 object :ARG0 z5 :ARG1 ( z10 complexity :domain ( z11 situation ) ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z12 i ) ) ) :snt ( z13 take-into-account :ARG0 ( z14 rule ) :ARG1 ( z15 factor :quant ( z16 several ) :ARG2-of ( z17 include :ARG1 ( z18 be-located-at :ARG1 ( z19 space :quant ( z20 superabundo ) ) :ARG2 ( z21 represent ) ) ) ) ) :snt ( z22 contrast :ARG2 ( z23 bark :ARG0 ( z24 it ) :polarity - ) ) )
(z0 / multi-sentence
    :snt1 (z1 / contrast-01
              :ARG2 (z2 / glad-02
                        :ARG0 (z3 / and
                                  :op1 (z4 / opt-01
                                           :ARG0 (z5 / person
                                                     :name (z6 / name
                                                               :op1 "Donald"))
                                           :ARG1 (z7 / mea-culpa-00
                                                     :mod (z8 / straightforward))
                                           :polarity -)
                                  :op2 (z9 / object-01
                                           :ARG0 z5
                                           :ARG1 (z10 / complexity
                                                      :domain (z11 / situation))))
                        :ARG1 (z12 / i)))
    :snt2 (z13 / take-into-account-04
               :ARG0 (z14 / rule-01)
               :ARG1 (z15 / factor
                          :quant (z16 / several)
                          :ARG2-of (z17 / include-01
                                        :ARG1 (z18 / be-located-at-91
                                                   :ARG1 (z19 / space
                                                              :quant (z20 / superabundo))
                                                   :ARG2 (z21 / represent-01)))))
    :snt3 (z22 / contrast-01
               :ARG2 (z23 / bark-01
                          :ARG0 (z24 / it)
                          :polarity -)))
But I is glad that Donald is not optixing for the straightforward mea culpa and is Ackning the complexity of the situation . The ruling took into an account several factors , including the fact that there was a superabundo of space in the representation . But it 's not barking .
z2 :ARG1 z12
z1 :ARG2 z2
z5 :name z6
z6 :op1 2
z4 :polarity 0
z4 :ARG0 z5
z7 :mod z8
z4 :ARG1 z7
z3 :op1 z4
z2 :ARG0 z3
z3 :op2 z9
z9 :ARG0 z5
z9 :ARG1 z10
z10 :domain z11
z0 :snt1 z1
z13 :ARG0 z14
z0 :snt2 z13
z15 :quant z16
z13 :ARG1 z15
z15 :ARG2-of z17
z17 :ARG1 z18
z19 :quant z20
z18 :ARG1 z19
z18 :ARG2 z21
z0 :snt3 z22
z23 :polarity 1
z23 :ARG0 z24
z22 :ARG2 z23