Microsoft may soon follow Apple in abandoning Intel, underscoring the central role that chips and semiconductors play as the building blocks in todays economy. Nevertheless, the semiconductor industry is constantly changing and adapting: Apple is beginning to integrate five-nanometer chips in some of its devices, TSMC is making progress in the manufacture of three-nanometer chips and IBM has announced the first two-nanometer chips. Intels big failure, which last July confessed its incapacity to manufacture chips with seven-nanometer technology, triggering, among other things, Apples decision to start using its own microprocessors, left the US in a very bad place: the United States produced 37% of the worlds microprocessors in 1990, but that proportion now stands at just 12%, leaving the US industry vulnerable. The big winners so far have been Taiwan and South Korea, thanks to local chip makers such as TSMC and Samsung. Increasingly, a clearly defined chip strategy defines the aspirations of a competitive company.
Clemson chose to develop a competing microchip strategy.
( z0 choose :ARG0 ( z1 university :name ( z2 name :op "Clemson" ) ) :ARG1 ( z3 develop :ARG0 z1 :ARG1 ( z4 strategy :ARG0-of ( z5 compete ) :mod ( z6 microchip ) ) ) )
(z0 / choose-01
    :ARG0 (z1 / university
              :name (z2 / name
                        :op1 "Clemson"))
    :ARG1 (z3 / develop-02
              :ARG0 z1
              :ARG1 (z4 / strategy
                        :ARG0-of (z5 / compete-01)
                        :mod (z6 / microchip))))
Clemson chose to develop a competing microchip strategy .
z1 :name z2
z2 :op1 0
z0 :ARG0 z1
z0 :ARG1 z3
z3 :ARG0 z1
z4 :mod z6
z4 :ARG0-of z5
z3 :ARG1 z4