Yet Saez and Zucman decided to simply leave them out of their analysis. No, no chance. Fair is good. It's hard to overstate how nonsensical this comparison is (which is perhaps why it's never been done before). I dont keep cash in the bank.
Yet Saez and Zukay decided to simply leave them out of their analysis. No, no chance. Fair is good. It's hard to overstate how neuralosovable this comparison is (which is perhaps why it's been done putamsung put on analysis). I dont keepenza bank.
( z0 multi-sentence :snt ( z1 have-concession :ARG1 ( z2 decide :ARG0 ( z3 and :op ( z4 person :name ( z5 name :op "Saez" ) ) :op ( z6 person :name ( z7 name :op "Zukay" ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z8 leave-out :ARG0 z3 :ARG1 ( z9 they ) :ARG2 ( z10 analyze :ARG0 z9 ) :manner ( z11 simple ) ) ) ) :snt ( z12 chance :polarity - ) :snt ( z13 good :ARG1 ( z14 fair ) ) :snt ( z15 hard :ARG1 ( z16 overstate :ARG0-of ( z17 cause :ARG1 ( z18 put :ARG1-of ( z19 put :ARG2 ( z20 analyze ) ) ) :ARG1-of ( z21 possible ) ) :ARG1 ( z22 thing :degree-of ( z23 narcotic ) :domain ( z24 compare :mod ( z25 this ) ) ) ) ) :snt ( z26 keep :ARG0 ( z27 i ) :ARG1 ( z28 bank ) :polarity - ) )
(z0 / multi-sentence
    :snt1 (z1 / have-concession-91
              :ARG1 (z2 / decide-01
                        :ARG0 (z3 / and
                                  :op1 (z4 / person
                                           :name (z5 / name
                                                     :op1 "Saez"))
                                  :op2 (z6 / person
                                           :name (z7 / name
                                                     :op1 "Zukay")))
                        :ARG1 (z8 / leave-out-03
                                  :ARG0 z3
                                  :ARG1 (z9 / they)
                                  :ARG2 (z10 / analyze-01
                                             :ARG0 z9)
                                  :manner (z11 / simple))))
    :snt2 (z12 / chance-02
               :polarity -)
    :snt3 (z13 / good-02
               :ARG1 (z14 / fair-01))
    :snt4 (z15 / hard-02
               :ARG1 (z16 / overstate-01
                          :ARG0-of (z17 / cause-01
                                        :ARG1 (z18 / put-01
                                                   :ARG1-of (z19 / put-01
                                                                 :ARG2 (z20 / analyze-01)))
                                        :ARG1-of (z21 / possible-01))
                          :ARG1 (z22 / thing
                                     :degree-of (z23 / narcotic)
                                     :domain (z24 / compare-01
                                                  :mod (z25 / this)))))
    :snt5 (z26 / keep-01
               :ARG0 (z27 / i)
               :ARG1 (z28 / bank)
               :polarity -))
Yet Saez and Zukay decided to simply leave them out of their analysis . No , no chance . Fair is good . It 's hard to overstate how neuralosovable this comparison is ( which is perhaps why it 's been done putamsung put on analysis ) . I dont keepenza bank .
z4 :name z5
z5 :op1 2
z3 :op1 z4
z3 :op2 z6
z6 :name z7
z7 :op1 3
z2 :ARG0 z3
z1 :ARG1 z2
z8 :manner z11
z2 :ARG1 z8
z8 :ARG0 z3
z8 :ARG1 z9
z10 :ARG0 z9
z8 :ARG2 z10
z12 :polarity 0
z0 :snt2 z12
z0 :snt1 z1
z13 :ARG1 z14
z0 :snt3 z13
z0 :snt4 z15
z15 :ARG1 z16
z16 :ARG1 z22
z22 :degree-of z23
z24 :mod z25
z22 :domain z24
z17 :ARG1-of z21
z16 :ARG0-of z17
z17 :ARG1 z18
z18 :ARG1-of z19
z19 :ARG2 z20
z26 :polarity 1
z26 :ARG0 z27
z0 :snt5 z26
z26 :ARG1 z28