I know what the error was  incompetence. The departments position has not changed based on the statement made by the valuer. Although the valuer had discussed the possible need to apply a premium in certain circumstances, the auditor general has now talked to Colliers, which says the way the department used the advice was not reasonable. Instead, the department took the top of the band and added about 20%. Colliers said the way the department used its valuation was not reasonable.The department took the highest valuation that Colliers recommended and then added a premium of about 20% on top of that.
The department took the top of the band and decided to add 50% more than that.
( z0 and :op ( z1 take :ARG0 ( z2 department ) :ARG1 ( z3 top :part-of ( z4 band ) ) ) :op ( z5 decide :ARG0 z2 :ARG1 ( z6 add :ARG0 z2 :ARG1 ( z7 have-quant :ARG1 ( z8 percentage-entity :value 50 ) :ARG3 ( z9 more :quant z8 ) ) ) ) )
(z0 / and
    :op1 (z1 / take-01
             :ARG0 (z2 / department)
             :ARG1 (z3 / top
                       :part-of (z4 / band)))
    :op2 (z5 / decide-01
             :ARG0 z2
             :ARG1 (z6 / add-02
                       :ARG0 z2
                       :ARG1 (z7 / have-quant-91
                                 :ARG1 (z8 / percentage-entity
                                           :value 50)
                                 :ARG3 (z9 / more
                                           :quant z8)))))
The department took the top of the band and decided to add 50 % more than that .
z1 :ARG0 z2
z1 :ARG1 z3
z3 :part-of z4
z0 :op1 z1
z0 :op2 z5
z5 :ARG0 z2
z5 :ARG1 z6
z6 :ARG0 z2
z8 :value 0
z7 :ARG1 z8
z6 :ARG1 z7
z7 :ARG3 z9
z9 :quant z8