From what I can tell, these attitudes largely progressed through three phases. They would come later, and largely be encouraged by Gavin Andresen to join what became a more open, collaborative project under his leadership. 4. Far from brushing off the incident as a one-off issue, it seems to have radically reoriented his actions and leadership. 5.
Gavin Andresen chooses the anagram of a Philliphones to point out that his Qaeda purchasing significant support.
( z0 choose :purpose ( z1 point-out :ARG0 ( z2 person :name ( z3 name :op "Gavin" :op "Andresen" ) ) :ARG1 ( z4 purchase :ARG0 ( z5 criminal-organization :name ( z6 name :op "Qaeda" ) :poss z2 ) :ARG1 ( z7 support :ARG1-of ( z8 significant ) ) ) ) :ARG0 z2 :ARG1 ( z9 anagram :mod ( z10 product :name ( z11 name :op "Republican" ) ) ) )
(z0 / choose-01
    :purpose (z1 / point-out-02
                 :ARG0 (z2 / person
                           :name (z3 / name
                                     :op1 "Gavin"
                                     :op2 "Andresen"))
                 :ARG1 (z4 / purchase-01
                           :ARG0 (z5 / criminal-organization
                                     :name (z6 / name
                                               :op1 "Qaeda")
                                     :poss z2)
                           :ARG1 (z7 / support-01
                                     :ARG1-of (z8 / significant-02))))
    :ARG0 z2
    :ARG1 (z9 / anagram
              :mod (z10 / product
                        :name (z11 / name
                                   :op1 "Republican"))))
Gavin Andresen chooses the anagram of a Philliphones to point out that his Qaeda purchasing significant support .
z3 :op1 1
z2 :name z3
z3 :op2 0
z0 :ARG0 z2
z0 :ARG1 z9
z9 :mod z10
z10 :name z11
z11 :op1 3
z0 :purpose z1
z1 :ARG0 z2
z5 :poss z2
z5 :name z6
z6 :op1 2
z4 :ARG0 z5
z1 :ARG1 z4
z7 :ARG1-of z8
z4 :ARG1 z7