Third, we should recognise also that there is no limit on the maximum number of peers in the House. The result is that all too often this leaves peers carrying the can for inaction. It takes away a fundamental check on power. It is absurd that its powers are only advisory. It would be tempting to call cronyism in the Lords an abuse of the system, but the system itself is fundamentally broken.
The other publications which are tied to the vote for whomever is the first to provide input is known as "The Times".
( z0 know :ARG1 ( z1 publication :ARG1-of ( z2 tie :ARG2 ( z3 vote :ARG1 ( z4 whomever :ARG0-of ( z5 provide :ARG1 ( z6 input ) :ord ( z7 ordinal-entity :value 1 ) ) ) ) ) :mod ( z8 other ) ) :ARG2 ( z9 newspaper :name ( z10 name :op "The" :op "Times" ) ) )
(z0 / know-02
    :ARG1 (z1 / publication
              :ARG1-of (z2 / tie-01
                           :ARG2 (z3 / vote-01
                                     :ARG1 (z4 / whomever
                                               :ARG0-of (z5 / provide-01
                                                            :ARG1 (z6 / input)
                                                            :ord (z7 / ordinal-entity
                                                                     :value 1)))))
              :mod (z8 / other))
    :ARG2 (z9 / newspaper
              :name (z10 / name
                         :op1 "The"
                         :op2 "Times")))
The other publications which are tied to the vote for whomever is the first to provide input is known as " The Times " .
z1 :mod z8
z1 :ARG1-of z2
z2 :ARG2 z3
z3 :ARG1 z4
z7 :value 0
z5 :ord z7
z4 :ARG0-of z5
z5 :ARG1 z6
z0 :ARG1 z1
z10 :op1 1
z9 :name z10
z0 :ARG2 z9
z10 :op2 2