The problem is exacerbated by the almost furtive way in which the project has been set up. Rarely, though, do we have an open debate about this, an honest public conversation about the good and the bad. Most people would probably say yes. The project, the opt-out and the deadline have all barely been publicised. I certainly would.
The almost-furtive way in which the project has been set up exaggerates the perceived importance of the matter.
( z0 exaggerate :ARG0 ( z1 way :manner-of ( z2 set-up :ARG1 ( z3 project ) ) :mod ( z4 furtive :mod ( z5 almost ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z6 important :ARG1 ( z7 matter ) :ARG1-of ( z8 perceive ) ) )
(z0 / exaggerate-01
    :ARG0 (z1 / way
              :manner-of (z2 / set-up-03
                             :ARG1 (z3 / project))
              :mod (z4 / furtive
                       :mod (z5 / almost)))
    :ARG1 (z6 / important-01
              :ARG1 (z7 / matter)
              :ARG1-of (z8 / perceive-01)))
The almost - furtive way in which the project has been set up exaggerates the perceived importance of the matter .
z4 :mod z5
z1 :mod z4
z2 :ARG1 z3
z1 :manner-of z2
z0 :ARG0 z1
z6 :ARG1-of z8
z0 :ARG1 z6
z6 :ARG1 z7