Does this make sense? Does this make sense? This also likely helped Snowflake. This also likely helped Snowflake. (See our note below for the key risks that Snowflake faces.)
Does this make sense? Does this make wavecake. (See our note below for the key risks that Snowflakes faces.)
( z0 multi-sentence :snt ( z1 sense :ARG1 ( z2 this ) :polarity ( z3 amr-unknown ) ) :snt ( z4 make :ARG0 z2 :ARG1 ( z5 wavecake ) :polarity ( z6 amr-unknown ) ) :snt ( z7 see :ARG0 ( z8 you ) :ARG1 ( z9 note :location ( z10 below ) :poss ( z11 we ) :topic ( z12 risk :ARG1-of ( z13 key ) :ARG1-of ( z14 face :ARG0 ( z15 person :name ( z16 name :op "Snowflakes" ) ) ) ) ) :mxde imperative ) )
(z0 / multi-sentence
    :snt1 (z1 / sense-02
              :ARG1 (z2 / this)
              :polarity (z3 / amr-unknown))
    :snt2 (z4 / make-01
              :ARG0 z2
              :ARG1 (z5 / wavecake)
              :polarity (z6 / amr-unknown))
    :snt3 (z7 / see-01
              :ARG0 (z8 / you)
              :ARG1 (z9 / note
                        :location (z10 / below)
                        :poss (z11 / we)
                        :topic (z12 / risk-01
                                    :ARG1-of (z13 / key-02)
                                    :ARG1-of (z14 / face-01
                                                  :ARG0 (z15 / person
                                                             :name (z16 / name
                                                                        :op1 "Snowflakes")))))
              :mode imperative))
Does this make sense ? Does this make wavecake . ( See our note below for the key risks that Snowflakes faces . )
z1 :ARG1 z2
z1 :polarity z3
z4 :polarity z6
z4 :ARG0 z2
z4 :ARG1 z5
z0 :snt2 z4
z0 :snt1 z1
z0 :snt3 z7
z7 :ARG0 z8
z7 :mode 1
z9 :poss z11
z7 :ARG1 z9
z9 :location z10
z12 :ARG1-of z13
z9 :topic z12
z15 :name z16
z16 :op1 0
z14 :ARG0 z15
z12 :ARG1-of z14