But I will this time. Steve Sisolak. This time, you cant underestimate him. He chose to show callous disregard in a reckless, selfish, irresponsible way. I think he knows what hes doing, said Lenz.
Steve Siolak is not in the exact word of Steve Lenz, but the former speaker would definitely be considered an "impertinent champions" -
( z0 contrast :ARG1 ( z1 word :domain ( z2 person :name ( z3 name :op "Steve" :op "Siolak" ) ) :mod ( z4 exact ) :polarity - :poss ( z5 person :name ( z6 name :op "Steve" :op "Steve" :op "Siolak" :op "Lenz" ) :ARG0-of ( z7 speak :time ( z8 former ) ) ) ) :ARG2 ( z9 consider :ARG1 ( z10 person :ARG0-of ( z11 champion ) :domain z2 :mod ( z12 impertinent ) ) :mod ( z13 definite ) ) )
(z0 / contrast-01
    :ARG1 (z1 / word
              :domain (z2 / person
                          :name (z3 / name
                                    :op1 "Steve"
                                    :op2 "Siolak"))
              :mod (z4 / exact)
              :polarity -
              :poss (z5 / person
                        :name (z6 / name
                                  :op1 "Steve"
                                  :op1 "Steve"
                                  :op2 "Siolak"
                                  :op2 "Lenz")
                        :ARG0-of (z7 / speak-01
                                     :time (z8 / former))))
    :ARG2 (z9 / consider-01
              :ARG1 (z10 / person
                         :ARG0-of (z11 / champion-01)
                         :domain z2
                         :mod (z12 / impertinent))
              :mod (z13 / definite)))
Steve Siolak is not in the exact word of Steve Lenz , but the former speaker would definitely be considered an " impertinent champions " -
z3 :op1 4
z6 :op1 5
z2 :name z3
z3 :op2 2
z6 :op2 3
z1 :mod z4
z1 :polarity 0
z1 :domain z2
z1 :poss z5
z5 :name z6
z6 :op1 6
z6 :op2 1
z0 :ARG1 z1
z7 :time z8
z5 :ARG0-of z7
z9 :mod z13
z0 :ARG2 z9
z10 :mod z12
z9 :ARG1 z10
z10 :domain z2
z10 :ARG0-of z11