(No, that explanation doesnt make sense to me either.) The only problem? I would probably start saying something. This week, however, is qualitatively different. So, yes, hes not disappearing by any means.
geday>statement is no meaning he could possibly achieve over 0 goals in a game that is exempted from execution.
( z0 mean :ARG1 ( z1 state ) :ARG2 ( z2 possible :ARG1 ( z3 achieve :ARG0 ( z4 he ) :ARG1 ( z5 goal :quant ( z6 over :op 0 ) ) :subevent-of ( z7 game :ARG1-of ( z8 exempt :ARG2 ( z9 execute ) ) ) ) ) :polarity - )
(z0 / mean-01
    :ARG1 (z1 / state-01)
    :ARG2 (z2 / possible-01
              :ARG1 (z3 / achieve-01
                        :ARG0 (z4 / he)
                        :ARG1 (z5 / goal
                                  :quant (z6 / over
                                             :op1 0))
                        :subevent-of (z7 / game
                                         :ARG1-of (z8 / exempt-01
                                                      :ARG2 (z9 / execute-01)))))
    :polarity -)
geday>statement is no meaning he could possibly achieve over 0 goals in a game that is exempted from execution .
z0 :polarity 0
z0 :ARG1 z1
z0 :ARG2 z2
z2 :ARG1 z3
z3 :ARG0 z4
z6 :op1 1
z5 :quant z6
z3 :ARG1 z5
z3 :subevent-of z7
z7 :ARG1-of z8
z8 :ARG2 z9