You need to have a microscope to see it. 'It is beyond my understanding. I am still angry. I am disappointed and angry with it.' It's easy to criticise without giving any solutions so here it is.
You don’t need a microscope to see it. 'It is beyond my understanding. I am still unhappy and disappointed with it.”
( z0 multi-sentence :rel ( z1 it ) :snt ( z2 need :purpose ( z3 see :ARG0 ( z4 you ) :ARG1 ( z5 it ) ) :ARG0 z4 :ARG1 ( z6 microscope ) :polarity - ) :snt ( z7 beyond :domain ( z8 it ) :op ( z9 understand :ARG0 ( z10 i ) ) ) :snt ( z11 and :mod ( z12 still ) :op ( z13 happy :ARG0 ( z14 it ) :ARG1 ( z15 i ) :polarity - ) :op ( z16 disappoint :ARG0 z14 :ARG1 z15 ) ) )
(z0 / multi-sentence
    :rel (z1 / it)
    :snt1 (z2 / need-01
              :purpose (z3 / see-01
                           :ARG0 (z4 / you)
                           :ARG1 (z5 / it))
              :ARG0 z4
              :ARG1 (z6 / microscope)
              :polarity -)
    :snt2 (z7 / beyond
              :domain (z8 / it)
              :op1 (z9 / understand-01
                       :ARG0 (z10 / i)))
    :snt3 (z11 / and
               :mod (z12 / still)
               :op1 (z13 / happy-01
                         :ARG0 (z14 / it)
                         :ARG1 (z15 / i)
                         :polarity -)
               :op2 (z16 / disappoint-01
                         :ARG0 z14
                         :ARG1 z15)))
You don’t need a microscope to see it . ' It is beyond my understanding . I am still unhappy and disappointed with it . ”
z2 :polarity 0
z2 :ARG0 z4
z2 :ARG1 z6
z2 :purpose z3
z3 :ARG0 z4
z3 :ARG1 z5
z7 :domain z8
z9 :ARG0 z10
z7 :op1 z9
z0 :snt2 z7
z0 :snt1 z2
z13 :polarity 1
z13 :ARG1 z15
z11 :op1 z13
z11 :mod z12
z0 :snt3 z11
z11 :op2 z16
z16 :ARG1 z15
z16 :ARG0 z14
z13 :ARG0 z14
z0 :rel z1