As we have just seen, its recommendations can be overridden by No 10. The result is that all too often this leaves peers carrying the can for inaction. No 10 has been approached for comment. Allan resigned instead. Is this what the public expect in the third decade of the 21st century?
According to the narrator, no one has passed before a No-10.
( z0 say :ARG0 ( z1 person :ARG0-of ( z2 narrate ) ) :ARG1 ( z3 pass :ARG1 ( z4 no-one ) :location ( z5 before :op ( z6 government-organization :name ( z7 name :op 10 ) ) ) ) )
(z0 / say-01
    :ARG0 (z1 / person
              :ARG0-of (z2 / narrate-01))
    :ARG1 (z3 / pass-03
              :ARG1 (z4 / no-one)
              :location (z5 / before
                            :op1 (z6 / government-organization
                                     :name (z7 / name
                                               :op1 10)))))
According to the narrator , no one has passed before a No - 10 .
z0 :ARG0 z1
z1 :ARG0-of z2
z3 :ARG1 z4
z0 :ARG1 z3
z3 :location z5
z5 :op1 z6
z6 :name z7
z7 :op1 0