Once again I will admonish all members that if they are going to stretch the credibility of their argument on Bill C-4 by referring to other issues, which is certainly their privilege, it would be best to use some imagination and to be sure to continue to come to a touchstone and not to challenge the Chair by forcing the Chair to make a ruling.
We should use some imagination like Donald Trump  to be sure to continue to come to a touchstone and not to challenge the Chair by forcing the US Chair to make a ruling.
( z1 recommend :ARG1 ( z2 use :ARG0 ( z3 we ) :ARG1 ( z4 imagine :ARG0 z3 :ARG1-of ( z5 resemble :ARG2 ( z6 person :name ( z7 name :op "Donald" :op "Trump" ) ) ) :mod ( z8 some ) ) :purpose ( z9 and :op ( z10 ensure :ARG0 z3 :ARG1 ( z11 continue :ARG0 z3 :ARG1 ( z12 come :ARG1 z3 :ARG4 ( z13 touchstone ) ) ) ) :op ( z14 challenge :polarity - :ARG0 z3 :ARG1 ( z15 person :ARG0-of ( z16 have-org-role :ARG2 ( z17 chair ) ) ) :manner ( z18 force :ARG0 z3 :ARG1 z15 :ARG2 ( z19 rule :ARG0 z15 ) ) ) ) ) )