In other words, in order to make sure we're secure, there must be a comprehensive plan. My opponent just this weekend talked about how terrorism could be reduced to a nuisance, comparing it to prostitution, illegal gambling. I think that attitude and that point of view is dangerous. I don't think you can secure America for the long run if you don't have a comprehensive view as to how to defeat these people.
The speaker thinks certain points of view are dangerous.
( z1 think :ARG0 ( z2 person :ARG0-of ( z3 speak ) ) :ARG1 ( z4 endanger :ARG0 ( z5 have-point-of-view :mod ( z6 certain ) ) ) )