The Supreme Court said today states may bar the removal of life-sustaining treatment from comatose patients who have not made or cannot make their desires known.
If you have a family member in a coma, you might not legally be able to take them off life support.
The supreme court said that states may bar this, without any kind of existing directive from the patient. I think the system got confused because I worded the statement differently from the article. 
( z1 possible :ARG1 ( z2 capable :polarity - :ARG1 ( z3 you ) :ARG2 ( z4 take-off :ARG0 z3 :ARG1 ( z5 person :ARG0-of ( z6 have-org-role :ARG1 ( z7 family ) :ARG2 ( z8 member ) ) :ARG1-of ( z9 coma ) ) :ARG2-of ( z10 support :ARG1 ( z11 life ) ) ) :ARG1-of ( z12 legal ) ) )