Instead, I am raising this question of privilege on the grounds that this attack on Ms Copps is clearly a means to obstruct a member of Parliament of either house in the discharge of their duties, whether the duties are met in the other place or whether the duties are met in this place.
Sometimes members of parliament feel that their duties are being obstructed by some form of attack according to the speaker.
( z1 say :ARG0 ( z2 person :ARG0-of ( z3 have-org-role :ARG1 ( z4 government-organization :name ( z5 name :op "Parliament" ) ) :ARG2 ( z6 speaker ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z7 feel :ARG0 ( z8 member ) :ARG1 ( z9 obstruct :ARG0 ( z10 attack :mod ( z11 form :mod ( z12 some ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z13 duty :poss z8 ) ) :time ( z14 sometimes ) ) )