All right. Now, previously, on September 12th, the Court entered an order which went to the motion for reconsideration. That related specifically to -- filed by the reporters. That went specifically to our August 2nd order which, in effect, said that the reporters would have to testify at certain depositions.
The thing filed by reporters caused them to have to testify
We do not know what "that" is, nor do we know what the reporters filed. We also do not know if there is any direct link between what the reporters filed and their required testimony.
( z1 cause :ARG0 ( z2 thing :ARG1-of ( z3 file :ARG0 ( z4 person :ARG0-of ( z5 report ) ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z6 obligate :ARG2 ( z7 testify :ARG0 z4 ) ) )