Mr. Speaker, before looking specifically at Group No. 2 of motions, I would like to mention that I committed an almost unpardonable omission just now when I was listing all the groups of employees whom we would have liked to have seen receive more attention in the review of the Canada Labour Code.
The narrator does not think his omission was unpardonable.
He calls it "almost unpardonable", therefore he does not think it was unpardonable, but close to it. It's difficult because the statement is asking about detailed semantics which is hard for AI to deal with.
( z1 think :ARG0 ( z2 person :ARG0-of ( z3 narrate ) ) :ARG1 ( z4 possible :polarity - :ARG1 ( z5 pardon :ARG1 z2 :ARG2 ( z6 omit :ARG0 z2 ) ) ) )