I understand that that's not what the defendants want in this case, but I don't think it's called for. And, as a matter of fact, I think if I did that and I ordered that and if -- I assume that the reporters would not testify and I would predict, if it went to the Third Circuit on that basis, I would be reversed. I don't think that that's a fair area of inquiry to get into.
the reporters would think about testifying 
( z1 think :ARG0 ( z2 person :ARG0-of ( z3 report ) ) :ARG1 ( z4 testify ) )