For example, by suggesting that the Minister of Labour uses parliamentary immunity to take an unfair action against a person, he is implying that if he spoke outside the House of Commons the Minister of Labour would be subject to some kind of civil suit, so he is imputing motives to the Minister of Labour.
He is implying that if he spoke outside the House of Commons the Minister of Labour would never be subject to some kind of civil suit.
( z1 imply :ARG0 ( z2 he ) :ARG1 ( z3 have-condition :ARG1 ( z4 subject :polarity - :ARG1 ( z5 person :ARG0-of ( z6 have-org-role :ARG1 ( z7 political-party :name ( z8 name :op "Labour" ) ) :ARG2 ( z9 minister ) ) ) :ARG2 ( z10 sue :mod ( z11 civil ) :mod ( z12 kind :mod ( z13 some ) ) ) :time ( z14 ever ) ) :ARG2 ( z15 speak :ARG0 z2 :location ( z16 outside :op ( z17 government-organization :name ( z18 name :op "House" :op "of" :op "Commons" ) ) ) ) ) )