In other words, in order to make sure we're secure, there must be a comprehensive plan. My opponent just this weekend talked about how terrorism could be reduced to a nuisance, comparing it to prostitution, illegal gambling. I think that attitude and that point of view is dangerous. I don't think you can secure America for the long run if you don't have a comprehensive view as to how to defeat these people.
he does not think you can secure America for the long run if you don't have a comprehensive view as to how to defeat these people
( z1 think :ARG0 ( z2 he ) :ARG1 ( z3 possible :polarity - :ARG1 ( z4 secure :ARG0 ( z5 you ) :ARG1 ( z6 country :name ( z7 name :op "America" ) ) :duration ( z8 run :ARG1-of ( z9 long ) ) ) :condition ( z10 have :polarity - :ARG0 z5 :ARG1 ( z11 view :ARG0 z5 :ARG1 ( z12 thing :manner-of ( z13 defeat :ARG0 z5 :ARG1 ( z14 person :mod ( z15 this ) ) ) ) :mod ( z16 comprehensive ) ) ) ) )