But I think it's about his priorities. And let me tell you exactly why I think that the choice he made to give a tax cut for the oil companies and others before addressing this -- I mean, if you were the governor of a state that was dead last in health care for families, and all of a sudden you found yourself with the biggest surplus your state had ever had in its history, wouldn't you want to maybe use some of it to climb from 50th to, say, 45 or 40 or something or maybe better?
The speaker claims if you were a senator of a state that was dead last in health care for families, wouldn't you want to climb from 50th to, say, 45 or 40? 
( z1 claim :ARG0 ( z2 person :ARG0-of ( z3 have-org-role :ARG2 ( z4 speaker ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z5 want :polarity - :ARG0 ( z6 you ) :ARG1 ( z7 climb :ARG0 z6 :ARG2 ( z8 or :op ( z9 person :ord ( z10 ordinal-entity :value 50 ) ) :op ( z11 person :ord ( z12 ordinal-entity :value 45 ) ) :op ( z13 person :ord ( z14 ordinal-entity :value 40 ) :ARG1-of ( z15 say ) ) ) ) ) :condition ( z16 have-org-role :ARG0 z6 :ARG1 ( z17 state :ARG1-of ( z18 die :ARG2 ( z19 care :ARG1 ( z20 health ) :beneficiary ( z21 family ) ) :ord ( z22 ordinal-entity :value -1 ) ) ) :ARG2 ( z23 senator ) ) :polarity ( z24 amr-unknown ) )