Of course, and that again -- no, I think that that was ill-considered. I did support it at the time. It was in the previous administration, in the Bush-Quayle administration, and I think in retrospect the lessons there are ones that we should take very, very seriously.
Bush-Quayle administration showed good judgement. 
The Bush-Quayle had the person support at the time but the person seem to change there mind after. Therefore could have been perceived as good judgment at the time (correct) but the person had some retrospective thought and thought that maybe it might not have been a good idea making the judgement(incorrect) Therefore it just a matter of perception whether that statement as correct or incorrect
( z1 judge :ARG0 ( z2 government-organization :ARG0-of ( z3 administrate ) :mod ( z4 person :name ( z5 name :op "Bush-Quayle" ) ) ) :ARG1-of ( z6 good ) )