In other words, in order to make sure we're secure, there must be a comprehensive plan. My opponent just this weekend talked about how terrorism could be reduced to a nuisance, comparing it to prostitution, illegal gambling. I think that attitude and that point of view is dangerous. I don't think you can secure America for the long run if you don't have a comprehensive view as to how to defeat these people.
My opponent had an attitude that was dangerous in nature.
( z1 have :ARG0 ( z2 person :ARG0-of ( z3 oppose :ARG1 ( z4 i ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z5 attitude :mod ( z6 nature ) :ARG0-of ( z7 endanger ) ) )