I would suggest that, if ever one were to search for an example of the lack of relevancy in 1999 of the Senate of Canada, the past two weeks of hearings in the Standing Senate Committee on Energy, Environment and Natural Resources stands as stark evidence in support of such a proposition.
The past two weeks of hearings in the Standing Senate Committee on Energy, Environment and Natural Resources has proven how little relevancy the Senate of Canada holds in 1999.
The overly wordy context made it difficult to understand that the Canadian senate was actually relevant until the very end of the paragraph, when it made it clear that the past two weeks were actually proof that the senate was not irrelevant.
( z1 prove :ARG0 ( z2 hearing :ARG0 ( z3 government-organization :name ( z4 name :op "Standing" :op "Senate" :op "Committee" :op "on" :op "Energy" :op "," :op "Environment" :op "and" :op "Natural" :op "Resources" ) ) :time ( z5 before :op ( z6 now ) :duration ( z7 temporal-quantity :quant 2 :unit ( z8 week ) ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z9 relevant :degree ( z10 little ) :ARG1-of ( z11 hold :ARG0 ( z12 government-organization :name ( z13 name :op "Senate" :op "of" :op "Canada" ) :mod ( z14 country :name ( z15 name :op "Canada" ) ) ) :time ( z16 date-entity :year 1999 ) ) ) )