I understand those things could come up in the course of the deposition, and I'll rule on those as I can if I'm not instantly available. So whether I'm sitting at trial or not -- and likely it will be a day when I'm sitting in trial -- we'll deal with it.
The writer makes rulings like a judge.
Based on context, making rulings and sitting at trial, the writer is a judge or rules like a judge. The model missed this logical inference.
( z1 rule :ARG0 ( z2 person :ARG0-of ( z3 write ) ) :ARG1-of ( z4 resemble :ARG2 ( z5 person :ARG0-of ( z6 judge ) ) ) )