I think that what -- I think the point of that is that anybody would have a hard time trying to make a tax cut plan that is so large, that would put us into such big deficits, that gives almost half the benefits to the wealthiest of the wealthy. I think anybody would have a hard time explaining that clearly in a way that makes sense to the average person.
Half the benefits would be given to the wealthiest of the wealthy with the tax cut plan.
The writer says it gives ALMOST half the benefits to the wealthiest of the wealthy; omitting one word fooled the model but changes the meaning.
( z1 give :ARG1 ( z2 benefit :ARG1-of ( z3 include :ARG3 "1/2" :ARG2 ( z4 benefit ) ) ) :ARG2 ( z5 person :ARG1-of ( z6 include :ARG2 ( z7 person :mod ( z8 wealth ) ) ) :ARG1-of ( z9 have-degree :ARG2 ( z10 rich ) :ARG3 ( z11 most ) ) ) :manner ( z12 plan :ARG1 ( z13 cut :ARG1 ( z14 tax ) ) ) )