General Olson, you say that the functional equivalent of an unlimited time would be a violation, but that's precisely the argument that's being made by petitioners here, that a limited time which is extendable is the functionable, functional equivalent of an unlimited time, a limited time that 10 years from now can be extended, and then extended again, and extended again. Why -- their argument is precisely that, a limited time doesn't mean anything unless it means, once you have established the limit for works that have been created under that limit, that's the end.
The petitioners are a group of mostly women that have estabilshed the limit works
( z1 group :cxnsistof ( z2 woman :quant ( z3 most ) :ARG0-of ( z4 establish :ARG1 ( z5 work :ARG1 ( z6 limit ) ) ) ) :domain ( z7 person :ARG0-of ( z8 petition ) ) )