But I thought you were saying that if you accept the Copyright Clause argument, then you have a way, in effect, of devaluing the Government's claim of its important interest and important objective when you get to the First Amendment intermediate scrutiny analysis.
The First Amendment doesn't have anything to do with copyright clause.
This is neither correct or incorrect as the first amendment deals with the freedom of speech and press but doesnt make a connection with the clause.
( z1 have-to-do-with :polarity - :ARG0 ( z2 law :name ( z3 name :op "First" :op "Amendment" ) ) :ARG1 ( z4 clause :mod ( z5 copyright ) ) :ARG2 ( z6 anything ) )