As you see, I'm far more genial than I express in writing. What I invited by that opinion, though, was that I would be available -- and I believe in an issue that is as important to the reporters and to you, as their counsel, as this, it is appropriate for you to stop a deposition on a question like that, instruct your witness not to answer, and allow the Court to rule on it. I was inviting you to do that. Now, I understand what your reasons are for not doing that, and I think you can do that.
I certainly think you are capable of many different things, including instructing your witness not to answer.
( z1 think :ARG0 ( z2 i ) :ARG1 ( z3 capable :ARG1 ( z4 you ) :ARG2 ( z5 thing :quant ( z6 many ) :ARG1-of ( z7 differ ) :ARG2-of ( z8 include :ARG1 ( z9 instruct :ARG0 z4 :ARG1 ( z10 person :ARG0-of ( z11 witness :ARG1 z4 ) ) :ARG2 ( z12 answer :polarity - :ARG0 z10 ) ) ) ) ) )