I got some of the details wrong last week in some of the examples that I used, Jim, and I'm sorry about that. And I'm going to try to do better. One of the reasons I regret it is that getting a detail wrong interfered several times with the point that I was trying to make.
One thing that went wrong due to incorrect details is that the incorrect details interfered with the point the person was trying to make. 
( z1 interfere :ARG0 ( z2 detail :ARG1-of ( z3 correct :polarity - ) ) :ARG1 ( z4 point :ARG0 ( z5 person ) :ARG1-of ( z6 try :ARG0 z5 ) ) )