8. Immediately following this Honourable Court's decision to grant the stay of the Feeney judgement, the Assistant Deputy Attorney General (Criminal Law) and I began receiving responses to a letter we had sent to our provincial counterparts on June 20, 1997, regarding the interim pro cedurcs, taken in each jurisdiction prior to the stay of the Feeney requesting the opinions of the provinces regarding a legislative scheme by which peace officers could obtain the constitutionally required warrant to enter a dwelling-house for the purposes of arrest.
The Assistant Deputy Attorney General (Criminal Law) and I received most of our responses with in the first six months after the decision to stay the Feeney judgment.
( z1 receive :ARG0 ( z2 and :op ( z3 person :ARG0-of ( z4 have-org-role :ARG2 ( z5 attorney :mod ( z6 general ) :mod ( z7 deputy :mod ( z8 assistant ) ) :mod ( z9 law :mod ( z10 criminal ) ) ) ) ) :op ( z11 i ) ) :ARG1 ( z12 respond :ARG0 z2 :quant ( z13 most ) ) :time ( z14 after :op ( z15 decide :ARG1 ( z16 stay :ARG1 ( z17 judge :ARG2 ( z18 person :name ( z19 name :op "Feeney" ) ) ) ) ) :quant ( z20 temporal-quantity :quant 6 :unit ( z21 month ) :ord ( z22 ordinal-entity :value 1 ) ) ) )