But I thought you were saying that if you accept the Copyright Clause argument, then you have a way, in effect, of devaluing the Government's claim of its important interest and important objective when you get to the First Amendment intermediate scrutiny analysis.
The narrator thought differently than the other party intended
( z1 think :ARG0 ( z2 person :ARG0-of ( z3 narrate ) ) :ARG1-of ( z4 differ :ARG2 ( z5 intend :ARG0 ( z6 party :mod ( z7 other ) ) ) ) )