Bill C-3 provides a dangerous and unnecessary exemption authorizing judges not to issue warrants for the taking of a sample if they believe that in doing so the impact on the individual's privacy and security would be grossly disproportionate to the public interest in the protection of society.
Judges believe that the impact on an individual's privacy and security are grossly disproportionate to the public interest
The statement professes a view of judges which we cannot be sure about. The system could not understand the nuance whereby the context states judges can not issue warrants IF they believe it, but we don't know whether they actually do believe or not. 
( z1 believe :ARG0 ( z2 person :ARG0-of ( z3 have-org-role :ARG3 ( z4 judge ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z5 impact :ARG1 ( z6 and :op ( z7 privacy :poss ( z8 individual ) ) :op ( z9 security :poss z8 ) ) :ARG1-of ( z10 have-mod :ARG2 ( z11 proportionate :polarity - :ARG1 z5 :ARG2 ( z12 interest :mod ( z13 public ) ) :ARG1-of ( z14 gross ) ) ) ) )