In conversations with Ms. Robbins, it is understood that Armstrong Environmental Inc. has been retained by past or present owners or some combination of these parties.
In conversations with Ms. Robbins, it is understood that Legstrong Environmental Inc.
It is armstrong environmental inc, not Legstrong I believe the model got confused because they are very similar words.
( z1 understand :ARG1 ( z2 company :name ( z3 name :op "Legstrong" :op "Environmental" :op "Inc." ) ) :time ( z4 converse :ARG0 ( z5 i ) :ARG2 ( z6 person :name ( z7 name :op "Ms." :op "Robbins" ) ) ) )