Mr. Speaker, I am rising today to speak to Bill C-54, the personal information protection and electronic documents act the purpose of which is to promote electronic commerce by providing Canadians with a right to privacy of personal information that is collected, used or disclosed in an increasingly information based economy and world.
Bill C-54 has already been passed in Canada to protect the right of Canadians to privacy of personal information that is collected, used or disclosed in an increasingly information based economy and world.
The context states that someone is rising to speak for Bill C-54, which implies that the bill hasn't yet been passed and is being argued/debated over still, thus making my statement that it's already been passed incorrect. I think the system had trouble with my answer because I copied much of the wording from the context to unnecessarily describe what Bill C-54 is for rather than leaving my statement at its simplest "Bill C-54 has already been passed in Canada."
( z1 pass :ARG1 ( z2 law :name ( z3 name :op "Bill" :op "C-54" ) ) :time ( z4 already ) :location ( z5 country :name ( z6 name :op "Canada" ) ) :purpose ( z7 protect :ARG0 z2 :ARG1 ( z8 right :ARG1 ( z9 person :mod z5 ) :ARG2 ( z10 privacy :topic ( z11 information :ARG1-of ( z12 personal ) :ARG1-of ( z13 collect ) :ARG1-of ( z14 use ) :ARG1-of ( z15 disclose ) :location ( z16 and :op ( z17 economy ) :op ( z18 world ) :ARG1-of ( z19 base :ARG2 ( z20 information :ARG1-of ( z21 increase ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )