Once again I will admonish all members that if they are going to stretch the credibility of their argument on Bill C-4 by referring to other issues, which is certainly their privilege, it would be best to use some imagination and to be sure to continue to come to a touchstone and not to challenge the Chair by forcing the Chair to make a ruling.
We should use some imagination like and to be sure to continue to come to a touchstone and not to challenge the Chair of the United States by forcing the Chair to make a ruling.
( z1 recommend :ARG1 ( z2 and :op ( z3 use :ARG0 ( z4 we ) :ARG1 ( z5 imagine :mod ( z6 some ) :ARG1-of ( z7 resemble ) ) ) :op ( z8 ensure :ARG0 z4 :ARG1 ( z9 continue :ARG0 z4 :ARG1 ( z10 come :ARG1 z4 :ARG4 ( z11 touchstone ) ) ) ) :op ( z12 challenge :polarity - :ARG0 z4 :ARG1 ( z13 person :ARG0-of ( z14 have-org-role :ARG1 ( z15 country :name ( z16 name :op "United" :op "States" ) ) :ARG2 ( z17 chairman ) ) ) :manner ( z18 force :ARG0 z4 :ARG1 z13 :ARG2 ( z19 rule :ARG0 z13 ) ) ) ) )