Yes, but take one of the early extensions, just extending a -- an already granted patent to an inventor for an extra 10 years. How can that be squared with the language of the provision? Maybe Congress did it, but maybe it acted improperly when it did it.
The interpretation of giving and helping is seen as questionable when looking at some set regulations.
The reason being the statement looks at the process of giving and providing and it questions how can the act of helping and providing be squared with the regulations. So it is being seen as questionable.
( z1 see :ARG1 ( z2 interpret :ARG1 ( z3 and :op ( z4 give ) :op ( z5 help ) ) ) :ARG2 ( z6 question :ARG1 z2 ) :time ( z7 look :ARG1 ( z8 regulate :ARG1-of ( z9 set ) :quant ( z10 some ) ) ) )