I thought my opinion was clear in that regard, and as you appropriately characterize, no questions as to bias or motivation or reasons to misrepresent quotes would be allowed in. There I believe we would decidedly fly in the face of established case law.
The speaker has a high regard for case law
( z1 regard :ARG0 ( z2 person :ARG0-of ( z3 speak ) ) :ARG1 ( z4 law :mod ( z5 case ) ) :ARG1-of ( z6 high ) )