Yes, and what -- but the definition of the term was a responsibility vested in Congress, because it has the power -- the legislative history of the 1998 act itself suggests what was going on here and suggests why the Framers gave this authority to Congress. There were numerous hearings, there were testimony by the folks that represent the same position as petitioners here as to why this shouldn't be done, why it should be that this done. Congress weighed -- as this Court, the phrase Court used, I think it was in the Feist case,the delicate balance that was so difficult for Congress to--
The 1998 act was drafted prior to the release of the Feist case. 
The statement indicates that the Feist case analyzed the delicate balance that was so difficult to articulate in the legislation that was passed in the 1998 act.  This means that the legislation had to have been in existence prior to the case.  Perhaps the system got confused because the statement didn't expressly articulate what came first and what followed. 
( z1 draft :ARG1 ( z2 act :time ( z3 date-entity :year 1998 ) ) :time ( z4 prior :op ( z5 release :ARG1 ( z6 case :ARG2 ( z7 person :name ( z8 name :op "Feist" ) ) ) ) ) )