But you -- under your intermediate scrutiny test we would not be hypothesizing what might have been in Congress's mind. Your First Amendment test is a stringent one. You have to have an important purpose, and the means that you use is necessarily tied to that purpose. If you take that position, I don't see how you make the retroactive-prospective line work.
purpose can-t be measured
( z1 possible :polarity - :ARG1 ( z2 measure :ARG1 ( z3 purpose ) ) )