For example, by suggesting that the Minister of Labour uses parliamentary immunity to take an unfair action against a person, he is implying that if he spoke outside the House of Commons the Minister of Labour would be subject to some kind of civil suit, so he is imputing motives to the Minister of Labour.
He is not implying that if he spoke outside the House of Commons the Minister of Labour would be subject to some kind of civil suit.
( z1 imply :polarity - :ARG0 ( z2 he ) :ARG1 ( z3 subject :ARG1 ( z4 person :ARG0-of ( z5 have-org-role :ARG1 ( z6 political-party :name ( z7 name :op "Labour" ) ) :ARG2 ( z8 minister ) ) ) :ARG2 ( z9 sue :mod ( z10 civil ) :mod ( z11 kind :mod ( z12 some ) ) ) :condition ( z13 speak :ARG0 z2 :location ( z14 outside :op ( z15 government-organization :name ( z16 name :op "House" :op "of" :op "Commons" ) ) ) ) ) )