Once again I will admonish all members that if they are going to stretch the credibility of their argument on Bill C-4 by referring to other issues, which is certainly their privilege, it would be best to use some imagination and to be sure to continue to come to a touchstone and not to challenge the Chair by forcing the Chair to make a ruling.
It would be best to use some imagination and to be sure to continue to come to a touchstone and not to challenge the UK Chair by forcing the Chair to make a ruling.
( z1 have-degree :ARG1 ( z2 and :op ( z3 use :ARG1 ( z4 imagine :quant ( z5 some ) ) ) :op ( z6 ensure :ARG1 ( z7 continue :ARG1 ( z8 come :ARG4 ( z9 touchstone ) ) ) ) :op ( z10 challenge :polarity - :ARG1 ( z11 person :ARG0-of ( z12 have-org-role :ARG1 ( z13 country :name ( z14 name :op "UK" ) ) :ARG2 ( z15 chairman ) ) ) :manner ( z16 force :ARG1 z11 :ARG2 ( z17 rule :ARG0 z11 ) ) ) ) )