It's certainly the case that we are asserting, in light of the changed circumstances, that the opportunity to build upon works within the public domain is a fundamental First Amendment interest, and that the First Amendment values, vital speech interest at stake of this case, is that the public domain be permitted as a source for cultivating work about our culture without unnecessary legal restriction.
First Amendment values, vital speech interest at stake of this case is what we need to look at
( z1 need :ARG0 ( z2 we ) :ARG1 ( z3 look :ARG0 z2 :ARG1 ( z4 and :op ( z5 value :mod ( z6 law :name ( z7 name :op "First" :op "Amendment" ) ) ) :op ( z8 interest :mod ( z9 vital ) :topic ( z10 speak ) :ARG1-of ( z11 stake :ARG2 ( z12 case :mod ( z13 this ) ) ) ) ) ) )