The Butlers were forced to hire a lawyer and appeal the judge's orders on the grounds that, first, the judge applied an improper standard of proof; second, he relied on inadmissible evidence and hearsay; third, the hearing violated the principles of fundamental justice; fourth, the parents were not properly informed of the nature of the hearing; and fifth, the parents were not given an opportunity to call evidence.
The butlers hired a lawyer and he decided the judge had made some errors in decision making.
I believe it is definitely correct because it states that they were going to appeal the order and for it to be appealed the judge had ot make some errors as stated in the context.
( z1 and :op ( z2 hire :ARG0 ( z3 person :ARG0-of ( z4 have-rel-role :ARG2 ( z5 Butler ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z6 lawyer ) ) :op ( z7 decide :ARG0 z6 :ARG1 ( z8 err :ARG0 ( z9 person :ARG0-of ( z10 judge ) ) :ARG1 ( z11 decide :ARG0 z9 ) :mod ( z12 some ) ) ) )