Once again I will admonish all members that if they are going to stretch the credibility of their argument on Bill C-4 by referring to other issues, which is certainly their privilege, it would be best to use some imagination and to be sure to continue to come to a touchstone and not to challenge the Chair by forcing the Chair to make a ruling.
We should use some imagination and to be sure to continue to come to a touchstone and not to challenge the US Chair by forcing the USA Chair to make a ruling.
( z1 recommend :ARG1 ( z2 and :op ( z3 use :ARG0 ( z4 we ) :ARG1 ( z5 imagine :ARG0 z4 :quant ( z6 some ) ) ) :op ( z7 ensure :ARG0 z4 :ARG1 ( z8 continue :ARG0 z4 :ARG1 ( z9 come :ARG1 z4 :ARG4 ( z10 touchstone ) ) ) ) :op ( z11 challenge :polarity - :ARG0 z4 :ARG1 ( z12 person :ARG0-of ( z13 have-org-role :ARG1 ( z14 country :name ( z15 name :op "US" ) ) :ARG2 ( z16 chair ) ) ) :manner ( z17 force :ARG0 z4 :ARG1 z12 :ARG2 ( z18 rule :ARG0 z12 ) ) ) ) )