I did not view and do not view the law as providing that there is some exhaustion requirement, although I understand some cases have said that. In this particular fact situation -- and I do think, I will say, on the issue of precedent, you can distinguish cases of -- and I'm not so sure I would be as fearful as some might be as to precedential value. I think this case is somewhat distinguishable, and I don't know that a judge in another situation would knee-jerk allow this type of testimony. We are in a very unique situation here, and that's what we have.
This is a unique situtation.
We don't know if it's unique. The speaker say's they think it's unique but then states that there have been other cases. We don't know how similar those are
( z1 situation :ARG1-of ( z2 unique ) :domain ( z3 this ) )