Out in the west, yeah. And so -- on the logging issue. That's not the way I would have done it. Perhaps some of that land needs to be set aside. But I certainly would have consulted with governors and elected officials before I would have acted unilaterally.
Something was done about the logging issue.
The writer says "on the logging issue. That's not the way I would have done it." Which implies something was done on the logging issue. The model missed this logical inference.
( z1 do :ARG1 ( z2 something ) :ARG2 ( z3 log ) )