In other words, in order to make sure we're secure, there must be a comprehensive plan. My opponent just this weekend talked about how terrorism could be reduced to a nuisance, comparing it to prostitution, illegal gambling. I think that attitude and that point of view is dangerous. I don't think you can secure America for the long run if you don't have a comprehensive view as to how to defeat these people.
he thinks the attitude of his opponent is dangerous
( z1 think :ARG0 ( z2 he ) :ARG1 ( z3 endanger :ARG0 ( z4 attitude :poss ( z5 person :ARG0-of ( z6 oppose :ARG1 z2 ) ) ) ) )