The March<br>Tom's city had an uptick in police violence. Many felt it was getting out of hand. Tom helped orchestrate a protest march. Everything was by the book and the event went well. It helped shine light on the problem.
Tom followed the book when protesting violence against the police since he and his followers were protesting the violence committed by the police.  
This is definitely incorrect because it states that Tom is protesting the opposite items in the same sentence.  The context implies that he is protesting violence committed by police.  My statement stated that he was trying to march against violence committed against the police, not the violence committed by the police.  Since the statement included violence in both directions, the AI model could not adequately detect the difference.  
( z1 follow :ARG0 ( z2 person :name ( z3 name :op "Tom" ) ) :ARG1 ( z4 book ) :time ( z5 protest :ARG0 z2 :ARG1 ( z6 violence :prep-against ( z7 police ) ) ) :ARG1-of ( z8 cause :ARG0 ( z9 protest :ARG0 ( z10 and :op z2 :op ( z11 person :ARG0-of ( z12 follow :ARG1 z2 ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z13 violence :ARG1-of ( z14 commit :ARG0 z7 ) ) ) ) )