The simple issue here, because it is the Court's understanding that these individuals have denied that they made these remarks, is from the plaintiffs' standpoint how can they get something that is, in my view, on the purpose test, which clearly goes to the truth of the matter asserted, how do they get these newspaper articles into evidence? Well, they can't, in my view, without the reporters testifying.
The individuals denied making some remarks.
The text says it is the Court's understanding that these individuals have denied that they made these remarks, but that is just the Court's opinion - perhaps accurate or not. The model assumed by the wording.
( z1 deny :ARG0 ( z2 individual ) :ARG1 ( z3 remark :ARG0 z2 :quant ( z4 some ) ) )