I understand that that's not what the defendants want in this case, but I don't think it's called for. And, as a matter of fact, I think if I did that and I ordered that and if -- I assume that the reporters would not testify and I would predict, if it went to the Third Circuit on that basis, I would be reversed. I don't think that that's a fair area of inquiry to get into.
the third circuit would think hard about the case before reversing
( z1 think :ARG0 ( z2 government-organization :name ( z3 name :op "Third" :op "Circuit" ) ) :ARG1 ( z4 case ) :ARG1-of ( z5 hard ) :time ( z6 before :op ( z7 reverse :ARG0 z2 ) ) )