Once again I will admonish all members that if they are going to stretch the credibility of their argument on Bill C-4 by referring to other issues, which is certainly their privilege, it would be best to use some imagination and to be sure to continue to come to a touchstone and not to challenge the Chair by forcing the Chair to make a ruling.
Bill-C should be the topic of conversation
Once again I will admonish all members that if they are going to stretch the credibility of their argument on Bill C-4 by referring to other issues so with that to me it means that they must speak on C-4
( z1 recommend :ARG1 ( z2 topic :topic-of ( z3 converse ) :domain ( z4 law :name ( z5 name :op "Bill-C" ) ) ) )