Justice, we are not making an empirical claim at all. Nothing in our Copyright Clause claim hangs upon the empirical assertion about impeding progress. Our only argument is, this is a structural limit necessary to assure that what would be an effectively perpetual term not be permitted under the copyright laws.
The person speaking has spent a lot of time on this case
( z1 spend :ARG0 ( z2 person :ARG0-of ( z3 speak ) ) :ARG1 ( z4 time :quant ( z5 lot ) ) :ARG2 ( z6 case :mod ( z7 this ) ) )