All right. Now, previously, on September 12th, the Court entered an order which went to the motion for reconsideration. That related specifically to -- filed by the reporters. That went specifically to our August 2nd order which, in effect, said that the reporters would have to testify at certain depositions.
It was not the motion, but the order that came from it that directly caused the reporters having to testify.
( z1 contrast :ARG1 ( z2 motion :polarity - ) :ARG2 ( z3 cause :ARG0 ( z4 order :ARG1-of ( z5 come :ARG2 z2 ) ) :ARG1 ( z6 obligate :ARG1 ( z7 person :ARG0-of ( z8 report ) ) :ARG2 ( z9 testify :ARG0 z7 ) ) :ARG1-of ( z10 direct ) ) )