General Olson, you say that the functional equivalent of an unlimited time would be a violation, but that's precisely the argument that's being made by petitioners here, that a limited time which is extendable is the functionable, functional equivalent of an unlimited time, a limited time that 10 years from now can be extended, and then extended again, and extended again. Why -- their argument is precisely that, a limited time doesn't mean anything unless it means, once you have established the limit for works that have been created under that limit, that's the end.
Olson is a scientist that deals with functional equivalents of time.
( z1 scientist :domain ( z2 person :name ( z3 name :op "Olson" ) ) :ARG0-of ( z4 deal :ARG2 ( z5 equivalent :mod ( z6 functional ) :mod ( z7 time ) ) ) )