But I think marriage is a sacred institution. I'm going to be respectful for people who may disagree with me. I've had a record of doing so in the State of Texas. I've been a person that had been called a uniter, not a divider, because I accept other people's points of view.
The speaker indicates that he's a "uniter, not a divider" and believes the institution of marriage should be abolished to accommodate different points of view. 
( z1 indicate :ARG0 ( z2 person :ARG0-of ( z3 speak ) ) :ARG1 ( z4 and :op ( z5 contrast :ARG1 ( z6 unite :ARG0 z2 ) :ARG2 ( z7 divide :polarity - :ARG0 z2 ) ) :op ( z8 believe :ARG0 z2 :ARG1 ( z9 recommend :ARG1 ( z10 abolish :ARG1 ( z11 institution :mod ( z12 marry ) ) :purpose ( z13 accommodate :ARG0 z11 :ARG1 ( z14 have-point-of-view :ARG1-of ( z15 differ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )