It's certainly the case that we are asserting, in light of the changed circumstances, that the opportunity to build upon works within the public domain is a fundamental First Amendment interest, and that the First Amendment values, vital speech interest at stake of this case, is that the public domain be permitted as a source for cultivating work about our culture without unnecessary legal restriction.
First Amendment doesn't exist
( z1 exist :polarity - :ARG1 ( z2 law :name ( z3 name :op "First" :op "Amendment" ) ) )