Mr. Putin is going to have to make the decision as to whether or not he wants to adhere to rule of law and normal accounting practices so that if countries and/or entities invest capital, there's a reasonable rate of return, a way to get the money out of the economy.
Mr. Rutin is going to have to make the decision as to whether or not he wants to adhere to rule of law 
Mr. Ruten is not Mr. Putin, which makes the statement incorrect. I think the model got confused because it was such a subtle change.
( z1 obligate :ARG1 ( z2 person :name ( z3 name :op "Mr." :op "Rutin" ) ) :ARG2 ( z4 decide :ARG0 z2 :ARG3 ( z5 truth-value :polarity-of ( z6 want :ARG0 z2 :ARG1 ( z7 adhere :ARG0 z2 :ARG1 ( z8 rule :mod ( z9 law ) ) ) ) ) ) )