As you see, I'm far more genial than I express in writing. What I invited by that opinion, though, was that I would be available -- and I believe in an issue that is as important to the reporters and to you, as their counsel, as this, it is appropriate for you to stop a deposition on a question like that, instruct your witness not to answer, and allow the Court to rule on it. I was inviting you to do that. Now, I understand what your reasons are for not doing that, and I think you can do that.
Your witness is instructed not to answer and she must let the court rule.
It never states the gender of the witness.
( z1 and :op ( z2 instruct :ARG1 ( z3 person :ARG0-of ( z4 witness ) :poss ( z5 you ) ) :ARG2 ( z6 answer :polarity - :ARG0 z3 ) ) :op ( z7 obligate :ARG1 z3 :ARG2 ( z8 let :ARG0 z3 :ARG1 ( z9 rule :ARG0 ( z10 court ) ) ) ) )