The Harper as well as Graham set out very clear limits on the context of the ability to extend works in the public domain. Those limits make no sense under the reasoning the Government has offered. The Government's reasoning would make all of those opinions irrelevant and wrong.
Harper and Graham contradict each other
Both are stated to set out clear limits. I think the system got it wrong because I stitched together concepts that are independently correct
( z1 contradict :ARG0 ( z2 person :name ( z3 name :op "Harper" ) ) :ARG1 ( z4 person :name ( z5 name :op "Graham" ) ) )