The Government has argued as if petitioners had advanced a general theory of the Copyright Clause, or a general constraint under which Congress must operate. That is a mistake. This case is about limits to an enumerated power. It's not about general power of Congress to exercise its copyright authority.
Copyright Clause contains a q
letter isn't in the name
( z1 contain :ARG0 ( z2 law :name ( z3 name :op "Copyright" :op "Clause" ) ) :ARG1 ( z4 thing :mod "q" ) )