Mr. Speaker, the second petition deals with concerns about child pornography, specifically in British Columbia, and the fact that the B.C. Court of Appeal has struck down subsection 163(1)(4) of the criminal code that makes possession of child pornography a criminal offence and that the court decision is therefore placing children in British Columbia at risk.
If an officer saw a person with child porn, there is nothing they could do about it
As they struck down the instance of having child porn being a criminal offence, the police could do nothing
( z1 possible :ARG1 ( z2 do :ARG0 ( z3 officer ) :ARG1 ( z4 nothing ) :ARG2 ( z5 porn :mod ( z6 child ) ) ) :condition ( z7 see :ARG0 z3 :ARG1 ( z8 person :ARG0-of ( z9 have :ARG1 z5 ) ) ) )