Honourable senators, what can we do when one can fairly conclude, after a fair read of the current controversy between Mr. Justice McClung and Madam Justice L'Heureux-Dub and their respective decision, that both justices fell below standards of appropriate judicial self-restraint - Justice McClung in his obviously injudicious letter, and Madam Justice L'Heureux-Dub in her injudicious or intemperate language in her decision?
Mr. Justice McClung and Madam Justice L'Heureux-Dub have had an ongoing controversy
not sure if it's on going
( z1 controversy :ARG1-of ( z2 go-on ) :domain ( z3 and :op ( z4 person :name ( z5 name :op "Mr." :op "Justice" :op "McClung" ) ) :op ( z6 person :name ( z7 name :op "L'Heureux-Dub" ) :ARG0-of ( z8 have-org-role :ARG2 ( z9 justice :mod ( z10 madam ) ) ) ) ) )