Once again I will admonish all members that if they are going to stretch the credibility of their argument on Bill C-4 by referring to other issues, which is certainly their privilege, it would be best to use some imagination and to be sure to continue to come to a touchstone and not to challenge the Chair by forcing the Chair to make a ruling.
We should use some imagination to be sure to continue to come to a touchstone and not to challenge the Chair by forcing the Russian Chair to make a ruling.
( z1 recommend :ARG1 ( z2 use :ARG0 ( z3 we ) :ARG1 ( z4 imagine :quant ( z5 some ) ) :ARG2 ( z6 ensure :ARG0 z3 :ARG1 ( z7 and :op ( z8 continue :ARG0 z3 :ARG1 ( z9 come :ARG1 z3 :ARG4 ( z10 touchstone ) ) ) :op ( z11 challenge :polarity - :ARG0 z3 :ARG1 ( z12 person :ARG0-of ( z13 have-org-role :ARG2 ( z14 chair ) ) ) :manner ( z15 force :ARG0 z3 :ARG1 ( z16 person :ARG0-of ( z17 have-org-role :ARG1 ( z18 country :name ( z19 name :op "Russia" ) ) :ARG2 z14 ) ) :ARG2 ( z20 rule :ARG0 z16 ) ) ) ) ) ) )