Now, the most salient question then is, with respect to the reporters' appearance today, is it your understanding that the reporters are intending to invoke the same privilege cited by them yesterday, if called, when called, to testify by the plaintiffs?
the reporter appeared privileged yesterday.
The reporter is intending on invoking a privilege; it doesn't say he is privileged. I think the system read a lot of my key words such was "appear" and "privilege" and read it as correct due to these facts. It also might not have known the difference in different meanings of "privilege."
( z1 appear :ARG1 ( z2 privilege :ARG1 ( z3 person :ARG0-of ( z4 report ) ) ) :time ( z5 yesterday ) )