Contrary to what is happening in some other parts of the Amazon, where the forest is being slashed and burned at an alarming rate, those who want to save Acre's forest seem to be winning.
The Amazon has only been partly destroyed, not completely destroyed.
The paragraph describes slashing and burning of the Amazon, meaning it's been partly destroyed.  But the statement very, very strongly implies it still exists and some parts are being saved, meaning it hasn't been completely destroyed.  Thus, my statement is correct.  I think the system got confused because it doesn't understand that "slashing and burning" is destroying the Amazon.
( z1 contrast :ARG1 ( z2 destroy :ARG1 ( z3 forest :name ( z4 name :op "Amazon" ) ) :degree ( z5 part ) :mod ( z6 only ) ) :ARG2 ( z7 destroy :polarity - :ARG1 z3 :ARG1-of ( z8 complete ) ) )