But I thought you were saying that if you accept the Copyright Clause argument, then you have a way, in effect, of devaluing the Government's claim of its important interest and important objective when you get to the First Amendment intermediate scrutiny analysis.
Copyright Clause has a q
( z1 have :ARG0 ( z2 clause :topic ( z3 copyright ) ) :ARG1 ( z4 string-entity :value "q" ) )