We're not going to side door, you know, a bias argument by going into context. Context is a dangerous thing as it relates to what we're doing here. So, no, it's -- we presume that the statement was likely given to the reporter upon a question being asked by the reporter, although it could have been volunteered. That's of no moment.
The reporter asked a question.
The speaker says they presume the statement was given to a reporter after they asked, but also says that the answer could have been volunteered, unprompted by any question from the reporter.
( z1 question :ARG0 ( z2 person :ARG0-of ( z3 report ) ) )