Honourable senators, what can we do when one can fairly conclude, after a fair read of the current controversy between Mr. Justice McClung and Madam Justice L'Heureux-Dub and their respective decision, that both justices fell below standards of appropriate judicial self-restraint - Justice McClung in his obviously injudicious letter, and Madam Justice L'Heureux-Dub in her injudicious or intemperate language in her decision?
The two justices involved are different genders
One is addressed as Mr. and the other as Madam. I think the system got it wrong because I introduced an unfamiliar concept
( z1 gender :ARG1-of ( z2 differ ) :domain ( z3 person :quant 2 :ARG1-of ( z4 involve ) :ARG0-of ( z5 have-org-role :ARG2 ( z6 justice ) ) ) )