Selection of Prompt Engineering Techniques for Code Generation through Predicting Code Complexity
<|reference_start|>Selection of Prompt Engineering Techniques for Code Generation through Predicting Code Complexity: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in software engineering tasks. However, improving their accuracy in generating correct and reliable code remains challenging. Numerous prompt engineering techniques (PETs) have been developed to address this, but no single approach is universally optimal. Selecting the right PET for each query is difficult for two primary reasons: (1) interactive prompting techniques may not consistently deliver the expected benefits, especially for simpler queries, and (2) current automated prompt engineering methods lack adaptability and fail to fully utilize multi-stage responses. To overcome these challenges, we propose PET-Select, a PET-agnostic selection model that uses code complexity as a proxy to classify queries and select the most appropriate PET. By incorporating contrastive learning, PET-Select effectively distinguishes between simple and complex problems, allowing it to choose PETs that are best suited for each query's complexity level. Our evaluations on the MBPP and HumanEval benchmarks using GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4o show up to a 1.9% improvement in pass@1 accuracy, along with a 74.8% reduction in token usage. Additionally, we provide both quantitative and qualitative results to demonstrate how PET-Select effectively selects the most appropriate techniques for each code generation query, further showcasing its efficiency in optimizing PET selection.<|reference_end|>
@article{wang2024selection,
    title={Selection of Prompt Engineering Techniques for Code Generation through
  Predicting Code Complexity},
    author={Chung-Yu Wang, Alireza DaghighFarsoodeh, Hung Viet Pham},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16416},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2409.16416},
    primaryClass={cs.SE cs.AI}
}