Evolving Reliable Differentiating Constraints for the Chance-constrained Maximum Coverage Problem
<|reference_start|>Evolving Reliable Differentiating Constraints for the Chance-constrained Maximum Coverage Problem: Chance-constrained problems involve stochastic components in the constraints which can be violated with a small probability. We investigate the impact of different types of chance constraints on the performance of iterative search algorithms and study the classical maximum coverage problem in graphs with chance constraints. Our goal is to evolve reliable chance constraint settings for a given graph where the performance of algorithms differs significantly not just in expectation but with high confidence. This allows to better learn and understand how different types of algorithms can deal with different types of constraint settings and supports automatic algorithm selection. We develop an evolutionary algorithm that provides sets of chance constraints that differentiate the performance of two stochastic search algorithms with high confidence. We initially use traditional approximation ratio as the fitness function of (1+1)~EA to evolve instances, which shows inadequacy to generate reliable instances. To address this issue, we introduce a new measure to calculate the performance difference for two algorithms, which considers variances of performance ratios. Our experiments show that our approach is highly successful in solving the instability issue of the performance ratios and leads to evolving reliable sets of chance constraints with significantly different performance for various types of algorithms.<|reference_end|>
@article{ahouei2024evolving,
    title={Evolving Reliable Differentiating Constraints for the Chance-constrained
  Maximum Coverage Problem},
    author={Saba Sadeghi Ahouei, Jacob de Nobel, Aneta Neumann, Thomas B"ack, and
  Frank Neumann},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.18772},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2405.18772},
    primaryClass={cs.NE}
}