Evaluating Theory of (an uncertain) Mind: Predicting the Uncertain Beliefs of Others in Conversation Forecasting
<|reference_start|>Evaluating Theory of (an uncertain) Mind: Predicting the Uncertain Beliefs of Others in Conversation Forecasting: Typically, when evaluating Theory of Mind, we consider the beliefs of others to be binary: held or not held. But what if someone is unsure about their own beliefs? How can we quantify this uncertainty? We propose a new suite of tasks, challenging language models (LMs) to model the uncertainty of others in dialogue. We design these tasks around conversation forecasting, wherein an agent forecasts an unobserved outcome to a conversation. Uniquely, we view interlocutors themselves as forecasters, asking an LM to predict the uncertainty of the interlocutors (a probability). We experiment with re-scaling methods, variance reduction strategies, and demographic context, for this regression task, conducting experiments on three dialogue corpora (social, negotiation, task-oriented) with eight LMs. While LMs can explain up to 7% variance in the uncertainty of others, we highlight the difficulty of the tasks and room for future work, especially in practical applications, like anticipating ``false<|reference_end|>
@article{sicilia2024evaluating,
    title={Evaluating Theory of (an uncertain) Mind: Predicting the Uncertain
  Beliefs of Others in Conversation Forecasting},
    author={Anthony Sicilia and Malihe Alikhani},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.14986},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2409.14986},
    primaryClass={cs.CL cs.AI}
}