Sifting through the Chaff: On Utilizing Execution Feedback for Ranking the Generated Code Candidates
<|reference_start|>Sifting through the Chaff: On Utilizing Execution Feedback for Ranking the Generated Code Candidates: Large Language Models (LLMs), such as GPT-4, StarCoder, and CodeLlama, are transforming the way developers approach programming by automatically generating code based on given natural language descriptions. Despite advancements, generating syntactically and semantically correct code remains challenging, especially for complex programming tasks. Existing approaches typically generate multiple candidate solutions using LLMs to increase the likelihood of producing correct code. However, selecting the correct code from these candidates-a process known as code ranking-remains a major challenge. Current research on code ranking can be categorized into execution-based and non-execution-based methods. Execution-based methods, although effective, encounter notable limitations, such as scarcity of quality unit tests and security risks. Non-execution-based methods like CodeRanker, which rely solely on classification labels to train a code ranker, struggle to capture subtle errors and provide detailed error insights. Recognizing the strengths and limitations of both approaches, we propose a new method. The key insight of our work is that an effective code ranker is expected to truly comprehend the underlying causes of erroneous code, as relying solely on classification labels is insufficient. Inspired by this, this paper puts forward RankEF, an innovative approach for code ranking that leverages execution feedback. RankEF employs multi-task learning to integrate code classification with execution feedback generation. This approach enables the model to understand the reasons behind incorrect code, distinguishing between correct and incorrect solutions without the need to execute the code during the ranking phase. Experiments on three code generation benchmarks demonstrate that RankEF significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art CodeRanker.<|reference_end|>
@article{sun2024sifting,
    title={Sifting through the Chaff: On Utilizing Execution Feedback for Ranking
  the Generated Code Candidates},
    author={Zhihong Sun, Yao Wan, Jia Li, Hongyu Zhang, Zhi Jin, Ge Li, Chen Lyu},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.13976},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2408.13976},
    primaryClass={cs.SE}
}