Towards More Realistic Extraction Attacks: An Adversarial Perspective
<|reference_start|>Towards More Realistic Extraction Attacks: An Adversarial Perspective: Language models are prone to memorizing large parts of their training data, making them vulnerable to extraction attacks. Existing research on these attacks remains limited in scope, often studying isolated trends rather than the real-world interactions with these models. In this paper, we revisit extraction attacks from an adversarial perspective, exploiting the brittleness of language models. We find significant churn in extraction attack trends, i.e., even minor, unintuitive changes to the prompt, or targeting smaller models and older checkpoints, can exacerbate the risks of extraction by up to $2-4 \times$. Moreover, relying solely on the widely accepted verbatim match underestimates the extent of extracted information, and we provide various alternatives to more accurately capture the true risks of extraction. We conclude our discussion with data deduplication, a commonly suggested mitigation strategy, and find that while it addresses some memorization concerns, it remains vulnerable to the same escalation of extraction risks against a real-world adversary. Our findings highlight the necessity of acknowledging an adversary's true capabilities to avoid underestimating extraction risks.<|reference_end|>
@article{more2024towards,
    title={Towards More Realistic Extraction Attacks: An Adversarial Perspective},
    author={Yash More, Prakhar Ganesh, Golnoosh Farnadi},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.02596},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2407.02596},
    primaryClass={cs.CR cs.CL cs.LG}
}