Towards Reliable Latent Knowledge Estimation in LLMs: In-Context Learning vs Prompting Based Factual Knowledge Extraction
<|reference_start|>Towards Reliable Latent Knowledge Estimation in LLMs: In-Context Learning vs Prompting Based Factual Knowledge Extraction: We propose an approach for estimating the latent knowledge embedded inside large language models (LLMs). We leverage the in-context learning (ICL) abilities of LLMs to estimate the extent to which an LLM knows the facts stored in a knowledge base. Our knowledge estimator avoids reliability concerns with previous prompting-based methods, is both conceptually simpler and easier to apply, and we demonstrate that it can surface more of the latent knowledge embedded in LLMs. We also investigate how different design choices affect the performance of ICL-based knowledge estimation. Using the proposed estimator, we perform a large-scale evaluation of the factual knowledge of a variety of open source LLMs, like OPT, Pythia, Llama(2), Mistral, Gemma, etc. over a large set of relations and facts from the Wikidata knowledge base. We observe differences in the factual knowledge between different model families and models of different sizes, that some relations are consistently better known than others but that models differ in the precise facts they know, and differences in the knowledge of base models and their finetuned counterparts.<|reference_end|>
@article{wu2024towards,
    title={Towards Reliable Latent Knowledge Estimation in LLMs: In-Context
  Learning vs. Prompting Based Factual Knowledge Extraction},
    author={Qinyuan Wu, Mohammad Aflah Khan, Soumi Das, Vedant Nanda, Bishwamittra
  Ghosh, Camila Kolling, Till Speicher, Laurent Bindschaedler, Krishna P.
  Gummadi, Evimaria Terzi},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.12957},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2404.12957},
    primaryClass={cs.CL cs.LG}
}