Good Books are Complex Matters: Gauging Complexity Profiles Across Diverse Categories of Perceived Literary Quality
<|reference_start|>Good Books are Complex Matters: Gauging Complexity Profiles Across Diverse Categories of Perceived Literary Quality: In this study, we employ a classification approach to show that different categories of literary "quality" display unique linguistic profiles, leveraging a corpus that encompasses titles from the Norton Anthology, Penguin Classics series, and the Open Syllabus project, contrasted against contemporary bestsellers, Nobel prize winners and recipients of prestigious literary awards. Our analysis reveals that canonical and so called high-brow texts exhibit distinct textual features when compared to other quality categories such as bestsellers and popular titles as well as to control groups, likely responding to distinct (but not mutually exclusive) models of quality. We apply a classic machine learning approach, namely Random Forest, to distinguish quality novels from "control groups", achieving up to 77\% F1 scores in differentiating between the categories. We find that quality category tend to be easier to distinguish from control groups than from other quality categories, suggesting than literary quality features might be distinguishable but shared through quality proxies.<|reference_end|>
@article{bizzoni2024good,
    title={Good Books are Complex Matters: Gauging Complexity Profiles Across
  Diverse Categories of Perceived Literary Quality},
    author={Yuri Bizzoni, Pascale Feldkamp, Ida Marie Lassen, Mia Jacobsen, Mads
  Rosendahl Thomsen and Kristoffer Nielbo},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.04022},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2404.04022},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}