Shortcomings of LLMs for Low-Resource Translation: Retrieval and Understanding are Both the Problem
<|reference_start|>Shortcomings of LLMs for Low-Resource Translation: Retrieval and Understanding are Both the Problem: This work investigates the in-context learning abilities of pretrained large language models (LLMs) when instructed to translate text from a low-resource language into a high-resource language as part of an automated machine translation pipeline. We conduct a set of experiments translating Southern Quechua to Spanish and examine the informativity of various types of context retrieved from a constrained database of digitized pedagogical materials (dictionaries and grammar lessons) and parallel corpora. Using both automatic and human evaluation of model output, we conduct ablation studies that manipulate (1) context type (morpheme translations, grammar descriptions, and corpus examples), (2) retrieval methods (automated vs. manual), and (3) model type. Our results suggest that even relatively small LLMs are capable of utilizing prompt context for zero-shot low-resource translation when provided a minimally sufficient amount of relevant linguistic information. However, the variable effects of context type, retrieval method, model type, and language-specific factors highlight the limitations of using even the best LLMs as translation systems for the majority of the world's 7,000+ languages and their speakers.<|reference_end|>
@article{court2024shortcomings,
    title={Shortcomings of LLMs for Low-Resource Translation: Retrieval and
  Understanding are Both the Problem},
    author={Sara Court and Micha Elsner},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.15625},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2406.15625},
    primaryClass={cs.CL cs.AI cs.LG}
}