Is Next Token Prediction Sufficient for GPT? Exploration on Code Logic Comprehension
<|reference_start|>Is Next Token Prediction Sufficient for GPT? Exploration on Code Logic Comprehension: Large language models (LLMs) has experienced exponential growth, they demonstrate remarkable performance across various tasks. Notwithstanding, contemporary research primarily centers on enhancing the size and quality of pretraining data, still utilizing the next token prediction task on autoregressive transformer model structure. The efficacy of this task in truly facilitating the model's comprehension of code logic remains questionable, we speculate that it still interprets code as mere text, while human emphasizes the underlying logical knowledge. In order to prove it, we introduce a new task, "Logically Equivalent Code Selection," which necessitates the selection of logically equivalent code from a candidate set, given a query code. Our experimental findings indicate that current LLMs underperform in this task, since they understand code by unordered bag of keywords. To ameliorate their performance, we propose an advanced pretraining task, "Next Token Prediction+". This task aims to modify the sentence embedding distribution of the LLM without sacrificing its generative capabilities. Our experimental results reveal that following this pretraining, both Code Llama and StarCoder, the prevalent code domain pretraining models, display significant improvements on our logically equivalent code selection task and the code completion task.<|reference_end|>
@article{qi2024is,
    title={Is Next Token Prediction Sufficient for GPT? Exploration on Code Logic
  Comprehension},
    author={Mengnan Qi and Yufan Huang and Yongqiang Yao and Maoquan Wang and Bin
  Gu and Neel Sundaresan},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.08885},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2404.08885},
    primaryClass={cs.PL cs.CL cs.LG}
}