WildVision: Evaluating Vision-Language Models in the Wild with Human Preferences
<|reference_start|>WildVision: Evaluating Vision-Language Models in the Wild with Human Preferences: Recent breakthroughs in vision-language models (VLMs) emphasize the necessity of benchmarking human preferences in real-world multimodal interactions. To address this gap, we launched WildVision-Arena (WV-Arena), an online platform that collects human preferences to evaluate VLMs. We curated WV-Bench by selecting 500 high-quality samples from 8,000 user submissions in WV-Arena. WV-Bench uses GPT-4 as the judge to compare each VLM with Claude-3-Sonnet, achieving a Spearman correlation of 0.94 with the WV-Arena Elo. This significantly outperforms other benchmarks like MMVet, MMMU, and MMStar.   Our comprehensive analysis of 20K real-world interactions reveals important insights into the failure cases of top-performing VLMs. For example, we find that although GPT-4V surpasses many other models like Reka-Flash, Opus, and Yi-VL-Plus in simple visual recognition and reasoning tasks, it still faces challenges with subtle contextual cues, spatial reasoning, visual imagination, and expert domain knowledge. Additionally, current VLMs exhibit issues with hallucinations and safety when intentionally provoked. We are releasing our chat and feedback data to further advance research in the field of VLMs.<|reference_end|>
@article{lu2024wildvision:,
    title={WildVision: Evaluating Vision-Language Models in the Wild with Human
  Preferences},
    author={Yujie Lu, Dongfu Jiang, Wenhu Chen, William Yang Wang, Yejin Choi,
  Bill Yuchen Lin},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11069},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2406.11069},
    primaryClass={cs.CV cs.AI cs.CL}
}