Comparing Hallucination Detection Metrics for Multilingual Generation
<|reference_start|>Comparing Hallucination Detection Metrics for Multilingual Generation: While many hallucination detection techniques have been evaluated on English text, their effectiveness in multilingual contexts remains unknown. This paper assesses how well various factual hallucination detection metrics (lexical metrics like ROUGE and Named Entity Overlap, and Natural Language Inference (NLI)-based metrics) identify hallucinations in generated biographical summaries across languages. We compare how well automatic metrics correlate to each other and whether they agree with human judgments of factuality. Our analysis reveals that while the lexical metrics are ineffective, NLI-based metrics perform well, correlating with human annotations in many settings and often outperforming supervised models. However, NLI metrics are still limited, as they do not detect single-fact hallucinations well and fail for lower-resource languages. Therefore, our findings highlight the gaps in exisiting hallucination detection methods for non-English languages and motivate future research to develop more robust multilingual detection methods for LLM hallucinations.<|reference_end|>
@article{kang2024comparing,
    title={Comparing Hallucination Detection Metrics for Multilingual Generation},
    author={Haoqiang Kang, Terra Blevins, Luke Zettlemoyer},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10496},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2402.10496},
    primaryClass={cs.CL cs.AI}
}