Grading Massive Open Online Courses Using Large Language Models
<|reference_start|>Grading Massive Open Online Courses Using Large Language Models: Massive open online courses (MOOCs) offer free education globally to anyone with a computer and internet access. Despite this democratization of learning, the massive enrollment in these courses makes it impractical for one instructor to assess every student's writing assignment. As a result, peer grading, often guided by a straightforward rubric, is the method of choice. While convenient, peer grading often falls short in terms of reliability and validity. In this study, we explore the feasibility of using large language models (LLMs) to replace peer grading in MOOCs. Specifically, we use two LLMs, GPT-4 and GPT-3.5, across three MOOCs: Introductory Astronomy, Astrobiology, and the History and Philosophy of Astronomy. To instruct LLMs, we use three different prompts based on the zero-shot chain-of-thought (ZCoT) prompting technique: (1) ZCoT with instructor-provided correct answers, (2) ZCoT with both instructor-provided correct answers and rubrics, and (3) ZCoT with instructor-provided correct answers and LLM-generated rubrics. Tested on 18 settings, our results show that ZCoT, when augmented with instructor-provided correct answers and rubrics, produces grades that are more aligned with those assigned by instructors compared to peer grading. Finally, our findings indicate a promising potential for automated grading systems in MOOCs, especially in subjects with well-defined rubrics, to improve the learning experience for millions of online learners worldwide.<|reference_end|>
@article{golchin2024grading,
    title={Grading Massive Open Online Courses Using Large Language Models},
    author={Shahriar Golchin, Nikhil Garuda, Christopher Impey, Matthew Wenger},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11102},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2406.11102},
    primaryClass={cs.CL cs.AI}
}