Can visual language models resolve textual ambiguity with visual cues? Let visual puns tell you!
<|reference_start|>Can visual language models resolve textual ambiguity with visual cues? Let visual puns tell you!: Humans possess multimodal literacy, allowing them to actively integrate information from various modalities to form reasoning. Faced with challenges like lexical ambiguity in text, we supplement this with other modalities, such as thumbnail images or textbook illustrations. Is it possible for machines to achieve a similar multimodal understanding capability? In response, we present Understanding Pun with Image Explanations (UNPIE), a novel benchmark designed to assess the impact of multimodal inputs in resolving lexical ambiguities. Puns serve as the ideal subject for this evaluation due to their intrinsic ambiguity. Our dataset includes 1,000 puns, each accompanied by an image that explains both meanings. We pose three multimodal challenges with the annotations to assess different aspects of multimodal literacy; Pun Grounding, Disambiguation, and Reconstruction. The results indicate that various Socratic Models and Visual-Language Models improve over the text-only models when given visual context, particularly as the complexity of the tasks increases.<|reference_end|>
@article{chung2024can,
    title={Can visual language models resolve textual ambiguity with visual cues?
  Let visual puns tell you!},
    author={Jiwan Chung, Seungwon Lim, Jaehyun Jeon, Seungbeen Lee, Youngjae Yu},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.01023},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2410.01023},
    primaryClass={cs.CV cs.AI}
}