Efficacy of Synthetic Data as a Benchmark
<|reference_start|>Efficacy of Synthetic Data as a Benchmark: Large language models (LLMs) have enabled a range of applications in zero-shot and few-shot learning settings, including the generation of synthetic datasets for training and testing. However, to reliably use these synthetic datasets, it is essential to understand how representative they are of real-world data. We investigate this by assessing the effectiveness of generating synthetic data through LLM and using it as a benchmark for various NLP tasks. Our experiments across six datasets, and three different tasks, show that while synthetic data can effectively capture performance of various methods for simpler tasks, such as intent classification, it falls short for more complex tasks like named entity recognition. Additionally, we propose a new metric called the bias factor, which evaluates the biases introduced when the same LLM is used to both generate benchmarking data and to perform the tasks. We find that smaller LLMs exhibit biases towards their own generated data, whereas larger models do not. Overall, our findings suggest that the effectiveness of synthetic data as a benchmark varies depending on the task, and that practitioners should rely on data generated from multiple larger models whenever possible.<|reference_end|>
@article{maheshwari2024efficacy,
    title={Efficacy of Synthetic Data as a Benchmark},
    author={Gaurav Maheshwari, Dmitry Ivanov, Kevin El Haddad},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11968},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2409.11968},
    primaryClass={cs.CL cs.LG}
}