Ollabench: Evaluating LLMs' Reasoning for Human-centric Interdependent Cybersecurity
<|reference_start|>Ollabench: Evaluating LLMs' Reasoning for Human-centric Interdependent Cybersecurity: Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to enhance Agent-Based Modeling by better representing complex interdependent cybersecurity systems, improving cybersecurity threat modeling and risk management. However, evaluating LLMs in this context is crucial for legal compliance and effective application development. Existing LLM evaluation frameworks often overlook the human factor and cognitive computing capabilities essential for interdependent cybersecurity. To address this gap, I propose OllaBench, a novel evaluation framework that assesses LLMs' accuracy, wastefulness, and consistency in answering scenario-based information security compliance and non-compliance questions. OllaBench is built on a foundation of 24 cognitive behavioral theories and empirical evidence from 38 peer-reviewed papers. OllaBench was used to evaluate 21 LLMs, including both open-weight and commercial models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Microsoft, Meta and so on. The results reveal that while commercial LLMs have the highest overall accuracy scores, there is significant room for improvement. Smaller low-resolution open-weight LLMs are not far behind in performance, and there are significant differences in token efficiency and consistency among the evaluated models. OllaBench provides a user-friendly interface and supports a wide range of LLM platforms, making it a valuable tool for researchers and solution developers in the field of human-centric interdependent cybersecurity and beyond.<|reference_end|>
@article{nguyen2024ollabench:,
    title={Ollabench: Evaluating LLMs' Reasoning for Human-centric Interdependent
  Cybersecurity},
    author={Tam n. Nguyen},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06863},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2406.06863},
    primaryClass={cs.CR cs.AI cs.HC}
}