Every decision tree has an influential variable
<|reference_start|>Every decision tree has an influential variable: We prove that for any decision tree calculating a boolean function $f:\{-1,1\}^n\to\{-1,1\}$, \[ \Var[f] \le \sum_{i=1}^n \delta_i \Inf_i(f), \] where $\delta_i$ is the probability that the $i$th input variable is read and $\Inf_i(f)$ is the influence of the $i$th variable on $f$. The variance, influence and probability are taken with respect to an arbitrary product measure on $\{-1,1\}^n$. It follows that the minimum depth of a decision tree calculating a given balanced function is at least the reciprocal of the largest influence of any input variable. Likewise, any balanced boolean function with a decision tree of depth $d$ has a variable with influence at least $\frac{1}{d}$. The only previous nontrivial lower bound known was $\Omega(d 2^{-d})$. Our inequality has many generalizations, allowing us to prove influence lower bounds for randomized decision trees, decision trees on arbitrary product probability spaces, and decision trees with non-boolean outputs. As an application of our results we give a very easy proof that the randomized query complexity of nontrivial monotone graph properties is at least $\Omega(v^{4/3}/p^{1/3})$, where $v$ is the number of vertices and $p \leq \half$ is the critical threshold probability. This supersedes the milestone $\Omega(v^{4/3})$ bound of Hajnal and is sometimes superior to the best known lower bounds of Chakrabarti-Khot and Friedgut-Kahn-Wigderson.<|reference_end|>
@article{o'donnell2005every,
    title={Every decision tree has an influential variable},
    author={Ryan O'Donnell, Michael Saks, Oded Schramm, Rocco A. Servedio},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:cs/0508071},
    year={2005},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={cs/0508071},
    primaryClass={cs.CC cs.DM math.PR}
}