From Model-centered to Human-Centered: Revision Distance as a Metric for Text Evaluation in LLMs-based Applications
<|reference_start|>From Model-centered to Human-Centered: Revision Distance as a Metric for Text Evaluation in LLMs-based Applications: Evaluating large language models (LLMs) is fundamental, particularly in the context of practical applications. Conventional evaluation methods, typically designed primarily for LLM development, yield numerical scores that ignore the user experience. Therefore, our study shifts the focus from model-centered to human-centered evaluation in the context of AI-powered writing assistance applications. Our proposed metric, termed ``Revision Distance,'' utilizes LLMs to suggest revision edits that mimic the human writing process. It is determined by counting the revision edits generated by LLMs. Benefiting from the generated revision edit details, our metric can provide a self-explained text evaluation result in a human-understandable manner beyond the context-independent score. Our results show that for the easy-writing task, ``Revision Distance'' is consistent with established metrics (ROUGE, Bert-score, and GPT-score), but offers more insightful, detailed feedback and better distinguishes between texts. Moreover, in the context of challenging academic writing tasks, our metric still delivers reliable evaluations where other metrics tend to struggle. Furthermore, our metric also holds significant potential for scenarios lacking reference texts.<|reference_end|>
@article{ma2024from,
    title={From Model-centered to Human-Centered: Revision Distance as a Metric for
  Text Evaluation in LLMs-based Applications},
    author={Yongqiang Ma, Lizhi Qing, Jiawei Liu, Yangyang Kang, Yue Zhang, Wei
  Lu, Xiaozhong Liu, Qikai Cheng},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07108},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2404.07108},
    primaryClass={cs.CL cs.IR}
}