More Questions than Answers? Lessons from Integrating Explainable AI into a Cyber-AI Tool
<|reference_start|>More Questions than Answers? Lessons from Integrating Explainable AI into a Cyber-AI Tool: We share observations and challenges from an ongoing effort to implement Explainable AI (XAI) in a domain-specific workflow for cybersecurity analysts. Specifically, we briefly describe a preliminary case study on the use of XAI for source code classification, where accurate assessment and timeliness are paramount. We find that the outputs of state-of-the-art saliency explanation techniques (e.g., SHAP or LIME) are lost in translation when interpreted by people with little AI expertise, despite these techniques being marketed for non-technical users. Moreover, we find that popular XAI techniques offer fewer insights for real-time human-AI workflows when they are post hoc and too localized in their explanations. Instead, we observe that cyber analysts need higher-level, easy-to-digest explanations that can offer as little disruption as possible to their workflows. We outline unaddressed gaps in practical and effective XAI, then touch on how emerging technologies like Large Language Models (LLMs) could mitigate these existing obstacles.<|reference_end|>
@article{suh2024more,
    title={More Questions than Answers? Lessons from Integrating Explainable AI
  into a Cyber-AI Tool},
    author={Ashley Suh, Harry Li, Caitlin Kenney, Kenneth Alperin, Steven R. Gomez},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.04746},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2408.04746},
    primaryClass={cs.HC cs.AI}
}