Evaluation of Posits for Spectral Analysis Using a Software-Defined Dataflow Architecture
<|reference_start|>Evaluation of Posits for Spectral Analysis Using a Software-Defined Dataflow Architecture: Spectral analysis plays an important role in detection of damage in structures and deep learning. The choice of a floating-point format plays a crucial role in determining the accuracy and performance of spectral analysis. The IEEE Std 754\textsuperscript{TM} floating-point format (IEEE~754 for short) is supported by most major hardware vendors for ``normal'' floats. However, it has several limitations. Previous work has attempted to evaluate posit format with respect to accuracy and performance. The accuracy of the posit has been established over IEEE~754 for a variety of applications. For example, our analysis of the Fast Fourier Transform shows 2x better accuracy when using a 32-bit posit vs. a 32-bit IEEE754 format. For spectral analysis, 32-bit posits are substantially more accurate than 32-bit IEEE~754 floats. Although posit has shown better accuracy than IEEE~754, a fair evaluation of posit with IEEE~754 format using a real hardware implementation has been lacking so far. A software simulation of posit format on an x86 CPU is about $\mathbf{69.3\times}$ slower than native IEEE~754 hardware for normal floats for a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of $\mathbf{2^{28}}$ points. We propose the use of a software-defined dataflow architecture to evaluate performance and accuracy of posits in spectral analysis. Our dataflow architecture uses reconfigurable logical elements that express algorithms using only integer operations. Our architecture does not have an FPU, and we express both IEEE~754 and posit arithmetic using the same integer operations within the hardware. On our dataflow architecture, the posit format is only $\mathbf{1.8\times}$ slower than IEEE~754 for a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of $\mathbf{2^{28}\approx 268}$ million points. With this implementation, we empirically propose a new lower bound for the performance of posit compared to IEEE~754 format.<|reference_end|>
@article{deshmukh2024evaluation,
    title={Evaluation of Posits for Spectral Analysis Using a Software-Defined
  Dataflow Architecture},
    author={Sameer Deshmukh, Daniel Khankin, William Killian, John Gustafson, Elad
  Raz},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.05398},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2406.05398},
    primaryClass={cs.AR}
}