A Comparison of Vulnerability Feature Extraction Methods from Textual Attack Patterns
<|reference_start|>A Comparison of Vulnerability Feature Extraction Methods from Textual Attack Patterns: Nowadays, threat reports from cybersecurity vendors incorporate detailed descriptions of attacks within unstructured text. Knowing vulnerabilities that are related to these reports helps cybersecurity researchers and practitioners understand and adjust to evolving attacks and develop mitigation plans. This paper aims to aid cybersecurity researchers and practitioners in choosing attack extraction methods to enhance the monitoring and sharing of threat intelligence. In this work, we examine five feature extraction methods (TF-IDF, LSI, BERT, MiniLM, RoBERTa) and find that Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) outperforms the other four methods with a precision of 75\% and an F1 score of 64\%. The findings offer valuable insights to the cybersecurity community, and our research can aid cybersecurity researchers in evaluating and comparing the effectiveness of upcoming extraction methods.<|reference_end|>
@article{othman2024a,
    title={A Comparison of Vulnerability Feature Extraction Methods from Textual
  Attack Patterns},
    author={Refat Othman and Bruno Rossi and Russo Barbara},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.06753},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2407.06753},
    primaryClass={cs.CR cs.SE}
}