Not Too Long, Not Too Short: Goldilocks Principle of 'Optimal' Reflection Time on Online Deliberation Platforms
<|reference_start|>Not Too Long, Not Too Short: Goldilocks Principle of 'Optimal' Reflection Time on Online Deliberation Platforms: The deliberative potential of online platforms has been widely examined but the impact of reflection time on the quality of deliberation remains under-explored. This paper presents two user studies involving 100 and 72 participants respectively, to investigate the impact of reflection time on the quality of deliberation in minute-scale deliberations. In the first study, we identified an optimal reflection time for composing short opinion comments. In the second study, we introduced four distinct interface-based time nudges aimed at encouraging reflection near the optimal time. While these nudges may not improve the quality of deliberation, they effectively prolonged reflection periods. Additionally, we observed mixed effects on users' experience, influenced by the nature of the time nudges. Our findings suggest that reflection time is crucial, particularly for users who typically deliberate below the optimal reflection threshold.<|reference_end|>
@article{yeo2024not,
    title={Not Too Long, Not Too Short: Goldilocks Principle of 'Optimal'
  Reflection Time on Online Deliberation Platforms},
    author={ShunYi Yeo and Simon Tangi Perrault},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.09084},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2408.09084},
    primaryClass={cs.HC}
}