LLM-RankFusion: Mitigating Intrinsic Inconsistency in LLM-based Ranking
<|reference_start|>LLM-RankFusion: Mitigating Intrinsic Inconsistency in LLM-based Ranking: Ranking passages by prompting a large language model (LLM) can achieve promising performance in modern information retrieval (IR) systems. A common approach is to sort the ranking list by prompting LLMs for pairwise comparison. However, sorting-based methods require consistent comparisons to correctly sort the passages, which we show that LLMs often violate. We identify two kinds of intrinsic inconsistency in LLM-based pairwise comparisons: order inconsistency which leads to conflicting results when switching the passage order, and transitive inconsistency which leads to non-transitive triads among all preference pairs. In this paper, we propose LLM-RankFusion, an LLM-based ranking framework that mitigates these inconsistencies and produces a robust ranking list. LLM-RankFusion mitigates order inconsistency using in-context learning (ICL) to demonstrate order-agnostic comparisons and calibration to estimate the underlying preference probability between two passages. We then address transitive inconsistency by aggregating the ranking results from multiple rankers. In our experiments, we empirically show that LLM-RankFusion can significantly reduce inconsistent pairwise comparison results, and improve the ranking quality by making the final ranking list more robust.<|reference_end|>
@article{zeng2024llm-rankfusion:,
    title={LLM-RankFusion: Mitigating Intrinsic Inconsistency in LLM-based Ranking},
    author={Yifan Zeng, Ojas Tendolkar, Raymond Baartmans, Qingyun Wu, Huazheng
  Wang, Lizhong Chen},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.00231},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2406.00231},
    primaryClass={cs.IR cs.AI cs.CL}
}