Can AI Understand Human Personality? -- Comparing Human Experts and AI Systems at Predicting Personality Correlations
<|reference_start|>Can AI Understand Human Personality? -- Comparing Human Experts and AI Systems at Predicting Personality Correlations: We test the abilities of specialised deep neural networks like PersonalityMap as well as general LLMs like GPT-4o and Claude 3 Opus in understanding human personality. Specifically, we compare their ability to predict correlations between personality items to the abilities of lay people and academic experts. We find that when compared with individual humans, all AI models make better predictions than the vast majority of lay people and academic experts. However, when selecting the median prediction for each item, we find a different pattern: Experts and PersonalityMap outperform LLMs and lay people on most measures. Our results suggest that while frontier LLMs' are better than most individual humans at predicting correlations between personality items, specialised models like PersonalityMap continue to match or exceed expert human performance even on some outcome measures where LLMs underperform. This provides evidence both in favour of the general capabilities of large language models and in favour of the continued place for specialised models trained and deployed for specific domains.<|reference_end|>
@article{schoenegger2024can,
    title={Can AI Understand Human Personality? -- Comparing Human Experts and AI
  Systems at Predicting Personality Correlations},
    author={Philipp Schoenegger, Spencer Greenberg, Alexander Grishin, Joshua
  Lewis, and Lucius Caviola},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08170},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2406.08170},
    primaryClass={cs.CY}
}