A comparison of Single- and Double-generator formalisms for Thermodynamics-Informed Neural Networks
<|reference_start|>A comparison of Single- and Double-generator formalisms for Thermodynamics-Informed Neural Networks: The development of inductive biases has been shown to be a very effective way to increase the accuracy and robustness of neural networks, particularly when they are used to predict physical phenomena. These biases significantly increase the certainty of predictions, decrease the error made and allow considerably smaller datasets to be used.   There are a multitude of methods in the literature to develop these biases. One of the most effective ways, when dealing with physical phenomena, is to introduce physical principles of recognised validity into the network architecture.   The problem becomes more complex without knowledge of the physical principles governing the phenomena under study. A very interesting possibility then is to turn to the principles of thermodynamics, which are universally valid, regardless of the level of abstraction of the description sought for the phenomenon under study.   To ensure compliance with the principles of thermodynamics, there are formulations that have a long tradition in many branches of science. In the field of rheology, for example, two main types of formalisms are used to ensure compliance with these principles: one-generator and two-generator formalisms. In this paper we study the advantages and disadvantages of each, using classical problems with known solutions and synthetic data.<|reference_end|>
@article{urdeitx2024a,
    title={A comparison of Single- and Double-generator formalisms for
  Thermodynamics-Informed Neural Networks},
    author={Pau Urdeitx, Ic'iar Alfaro, David Gonz'alez, Francisco Chinesta,
  El'ias Cueto},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.01060},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2404.01060},
    primaryClass={cs.LG}
}