Fakes of Varying Shades: How Warning Affects Human Perception and Engagement Regarding LLM Hallucinations
<|reference_start|>Fakes of Varying Shades: How Warning Affects Human Perception and Engagement Regarding LLM Hallucinations: The widespread adoption and transformative effects of large language models (LLMs) have sparked concerns regarding their capacity to produce inaccurate and fictitious content, referred to as `hallucinations'. Given the potential risks associated with hallucinations, humans should be able to identify them. This research aims to understand the human perception of LLM hallucinations by systematically varying the degree of hallucination (genuine, minor hallucination, major hallucination) and examining its interaction with warning (i.e., a warning of potential inaccuracies: absent vs. present). Participants (N=419) from Prolific rated the perceived accuracy and engaged with content (e.g., like, dislike, share) in a Q/A format. Participants ranked content as truthful in the order of genuine, minor hallucination, and major hallucination, and user engagement behaviors mirrored this pattern. More importantly, we observed that warning improved the detection of hallucination without significantly affecting the perceived truthfulness of genuine content. We conclude by offering insights for future tools to aid human detection of hallucinations. All survey materials, demographic questions, and post-session questions are available at: https://github.com/MahjabinNahar/fakes-of-varying-shades-survey-materials<|reference_end|>
@article{nahar2024fakes,
    title={Fakes of Varying Shades: How Warning Affects Human Perception and
  Engagement Regarding LLM Hallucinations},
    author={Mahjabin Nahar, Haeseung Seo, Eun-Ju Lee, Aiping Xiong, Dongwon Lee},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.03745},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2404.03745},
    primaryClass={cs.HC cs.AI cs.CL}
}