Statistics without Interpretation: A Sober Look at Explainable Machine Learning
<|reference_start|>Statistics without Interpretation: A Sober Look at Explainable Machine Learning: In the rapidly growing literature on explanation algorithms, it often remains unclear what precisely these algorithms are for and how they should be used. We argue that this is because explanation algorithms are often mathematically complex but don't admit a clear interpretation. Unfortunately, complex statistical methods that don't have a clear interpretation are bound to lead to errors in interpretation, a fact that has become increasingly apparent in the literature. In order to move forward, papers on explanation algorithms should make clear how precisely the output of the algorithms should be interpreted. They should also clarify what questions about the function can and cannot be answered given the explanations. Our argument is based on the distinction between statistics and their interpretation. It also relies on parallels between explainable machine learning and applied statistics.<|reference_end|>
@article{bordt2024statistics,
    title={Statistics without Interpretation: A Sober Look at Explainable Machine
  Learning},
    author={Sebastian Bordt, Ulrike von Luxburg},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.02870},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2402.02870},
    primaryClass={cs.LG}
}