Does Thought Require Sensory Grounding? From Pure Thinkers to Large Language Models
<|reference_start|>Does Thought Require Sensory Grounding? From Pure Thinkers to Large Language Models: Does the capacity to think require the capacity to sense? A lively debate on this topic runs throughout the history of philosophy and now animates discussions of artificial intelligence. I argue that in principle, there can be pure thinkers: thinkers that lack the capacity to sense altogether. I also argue for significant limitations in just what sort of thought is possible in the absence of the capacity to sense. Regarding AI, I do not argue directly that large language models can think or understand, but I rebut one important argument (the argument from sensory grounding) that they cannot. I also use recent results regarding language models to address the question of whether or how sensory grounding enhances cognitive capacities.<|reference_end|>
@article{chalmers2024does,
    title={Does Thought Require Sensory Grounding? From Pure Thinkers to Large
  Language Models},
    author={David J. Chalmers},
    journal={Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical
  Association, 2023},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2408.09605},
    primaryClass={cs.AI}
}