Anatomy of Elite and Mass Polarization in Social Networks
<|reference_start|>Anatomy of Elite and Mass Polarization in Social Networks: Existing methods for quantifying polarization in social networks typically report a single value describing the amount of polarization in a social system. While this approach can be used to confirm the observation that many societies have witnessed an increase in political polarization in recent years, it misses the complexities that could be used to understand the reasons behind this phenomenon. Notably, opposing groups can have unequal impact on polarization, and the elites are often understood to be more divided than the masses, making it critical to differentiate their roles in polarized systems. We propose a method to characterize these distinct hierarchies in polarized networks, enabling separate polarization measurements for these groups within a single social system. Applied to polarized topics in the Finnish Twittersphere surrounding the 2019 and 2023 parliamentary elections, our analysis reveals valuable insights: 1) The impact of opposing groups on observed polarization is rarely balanced, and 2) while the elite strongly contributes to structural polarization and consistently display greater alignment across various topics, the masses have also recently experienced a surge in issue alignment, a special form of polarization. Our findings suggest that the masses may not be as immune to an increasingly polarized environment as previously thought.<|reference_end|>
@article{salloum2024anatomy,
    title={Anatomy of Elite and Mass Polarization in Social Networks},
    author={Ali Salloum, Ted Hsuan Yun Chen, Mikko Kivel"a},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12525},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2406.12525},
    primaryClass={cs.SI physics.soc-ph stat.AP}
}