Evaluating Human-AI Collaboration: A Review and Methodological Framework
<|reference_start|>Evaluating Human-AI Collaboration: A Review and Methodological Framework: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in working environments with individuals, known as Human-AI Collaboration (HAIC), has become essential in a variety of domains, boosting decision-making, efficiency, and innovation. Despite HAIC's wide potential, evaluating its effectiveness remains challenging due to the complex interaction of components involved.   This paper provides a detailed analysis of existing HAIC evaluation approaches and develops a fresh paradigm for more effectively evaluating these systems.   Our framework includes a structured decision tree which assists to select relevant metrics based on distinct HAIC modes (AI-Centric, Human-Centric, and Symbiotic). By including both quantitative and qualitative metrics, the framework seeks to represent HAIC's dynamic and reciprocal nature, enabling the assessment of its impact and success. This framework's practicality can be examined by its application in an array of domains, including manufacturing, healthcare, finance, and education, each of which has unique challenges and requirements. Our hope is that this study will facilitate further research on the systematic evaluation of HAIC in real-world applications.<|reference_end|>
@article{fragiadakis2024evaluating,
    title={Evaluating Human-AI Collaboration: A Review and Methodological Framework},
    author={George Fragiadakis, Christos Diou, George Kousiouris, Mara Nikolaidou},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.19098},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2407.19098},
    primaryClass={cs.HC cs.AI}
}