Bounding Causal Effects with Leaky Instruments
<|reference_start|>Bounding Causal Effects with Leaky Instruments: Instrumental variables (IVs) are a popular and powerful tool for estimating causal effects in the presence of unobserved confounding. However, classical approaches rely on strong assumptions such as the $\textit{exclusion criterion}$, which states that instrumental effects must be entirely mediated by treatments. This assumption often fails in practice. When IV methods are improperly applied to data that do not meet the exclusion criterion, estimated causal effects may be badly biased. In this work, we propose a novel solution that provides $\textit{partial}$ identification in linear systems given a set of $\textit{leaky instruments}$, which are allowed to violate the exclusion criterion to some limited degree. We derive a convex optimization objective that provides provably sharp bounds on the average treatment effect under some common forms of information leakage, and implement inference procedures to quantify the uncertainty of resulting estimates. We demonstrate our method in a set of experiments with simulated data, where it performs favorably against the state of the art. An accompanying $\texttt{R}$ package, $\texttt{leakyIV}$, is available from $\texttt{CRAN}$.<|reference_end|>
@article{watson2024bounding,
    title={Bounding Causal Effects with Leaky Instruments},
    author={David S. Watson, Jordan Penn, Lee M. Gunderson, Gecia
  Bravo-Hermsdorff, Afsaneh Mastouri, Ricardo Silva},
    journal={40th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI
  2024)},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2404.04446},
    primaryClass={stat.ME cs.AI}
}