Transfer in a Connectionist Model of the Acquisition of Morphology
<|reference_start|>Transfer in a Connectionist Model of the Acquisition of Morphology: The morphological systems of natural languages are replete with examples of the same devices used for multiple purposes: (1) the same type of morphological process (for example, suffixation for both noun case and verb tense) and (2) identical morphemes (for example, the same suffix for English noun plural and possessive). These sorts of similarity would be expected to convey advantages on language learners in the form of transfer from one morphological category to another. Connectionist models of morphology acquisition have been faulted for their supposed inability to represent phonological similarity across morphological categories and hence to facilitate transfer. This paper describes a connectionist model of the acquisition of morphology which is shown to exhibit transfer of this type. The model treats the morphology acquisition problem as one of learning to map forms onto meanings and vice versa. As the network learns these mappings, it makes phonological generalizations which are embedded in connection weights. Since these weights are shared by different morphological categories, transfer is enabled. In a set of experiments with artificial stimuli, networks were trained first on one morphological task (e.g., tense) and then on a second (e.g., number). It is shown that in the context of suffixation, prefixation, and template rules, the second task is facilitated when the second category either makes use of the same forms or the same general process type (e.g., prefixation) as the first.<|reference_end|>
@article{gasser1995transfer,
    title={Transfer in a Connectionist Model of the Acquisition of Morphology},
    author={Michael Gasser (Indiana University)},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:cmp-lg/9507006},
    year={1995},
    number={IU Cognitive Science TR 147},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={cmp-lg/9507006},
    primaryClass={cmp-lg cs.CL}
}