Ambivalence in stakeholders' views on connected and autonomous vehicles
<|reference_start|>Ambivalence in stakeholders' views on connected and autonomous vehicles: Connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) are often discussed as a solution to pressing issues of the current transport systems, including congestion, safety, social inclusion and ecological sustainability. Scientifically, there is agreement that CAVs may solve, but can also aggravate these issues, depending on the specific CAV solution. In the current paper, we investigate the visions and worst-case scenarios of various stakeholders, including representatives of public administrations, automotive original equipment manufacturers, insurance companies, public transportation service providers, mobility experts and politicians. A qualitative analysis of 17 semi-structured interviews is presented. It reveals experts' ambivalence towards the introduction of CAVs, reflecting high levels of uncertainty about CAV consequences, including issues of efficiency, comfort and sustainability, and concerns about road co-users such as pedestrians and cyclists. Implications of the sluggishness of policymakers to set boundary conditions and for the labor market are discussed. An open debate between policymakers, citizens and other stakeholders on how to introduce CAVs seems timely.<|reference_end|>
@article{kacperski2024ambivalence,
    title={Ambivalence in stakeholders' views on connected and autonomous vehicles},
    author={Celina Kacperski, Tobias Vogel, Florian Kutzner},
    journal={HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. Automated
  Driving and In-Vehicle Experience Design. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in
  Computer Science(), vol 12212. Springer, Cham},
    year={2024},
    doi={10.1007/978-3-030-50523-3_4},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2403.12070},
    primaryClass={cs.CY}
}