Is What You Ask For What You Get? Investigating Concept Associations in Text-to-Image Models
<|reference_start|>Is What You Ask For What You Get? Investigating Concept Associations in Text-to-Image Models: Text-to-image (T2I) models are increasingly used in impactful real-life applications. As such, there is a growing need to audit these models to ensure that they generate desirable, task-appropriate images. However, systematically inspecting the associations between prompts and generated content in a human-understandable way remains challenging. To address this, we propose \emph{Concept2Concept}, a framework where we characterize conditional distributions of vision language models using interpretable concepts and metrics that can be defined in terms of these concepts. This characterization allows us to use our framework to audit models and prompt-datasets. To demonstrate, we investigate several case studies of conditional distributions of prompts, such as user defined distributions or empirical, real world distributions. Lastly, we implement Concept2Concept as an open-source interactive visualization tool facilitating use by non-technical end-users.   Warning: This paper contains discussions of harmful content, including CSAM and NSFW material, which may be disturbing to some readers.<|reference_end|>
@article{magid2024is,
    title={Is What You Ask For What You Get? Investigating Concept Associations in
  Text-to-Image Models},
    author={Salma Abdel Magid, Weiwei Pan, Simon Warchol, Grace Guo, Junsik Kim,
  Mahia Rahman, Hanspeter Pfister},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.04634},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2410.04634},
    primaryClass={cs.CV}
}