Decentralized Peer Review in Open Science: A Mechanism Proposal
<|reference_start|>Decentralized Peer Review in Open Science: A Mechanism Proposal: Peer review is a laborious, yet essential, part of academic publishing with crucial impact on the scientific endeavor. The current lack of incentives and transparency harms the credibility of this process. Researchers are neither rewarded for superior nor penalized for bad reviews. Additionally, confidential reports cause a loss of insights and make the review process vulnerable to scientific misconduct. We propose a community-owned and -governed system that 1) remunerates reviewers for their efforts, 2) publishes the (anonymized) reports for scrutiny by the community, 3) tracks reputation of reviewers and 4) provides digital certificates. Automated by transparent smart-contract blockchain technology, the system aims to increase quality and speed of peer review while lowering the chance and impact of erroneous judgements.<|reference_end|>
@article{finke2024decentralized,
    title={Decentralized Peer Review in Open Science: A Mechanism Proposal},
    author={Andreas Finke and Thomas Hensel},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.18148},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2404.18148},
    primaryClass={cs.GT cs.CY econ.GN q-fin.EC}
}