Beyond Predictive Algorithms in Child Welfare
<|reference_start|>Beyond Predictive Algorithms in Child Welfare: Caseworkers in the child welfare (CW) sector use predictive decision-making algorithms built on risk assessment (RA) data to guide and support CW decisions. Researchers have highlighted that RAs can contain biased signals which flatten CW case complexities and that the algorithms may benefit from incorporating contextually rich case narratives, i.e. - casenotes written by caseworkers. To investigate this hypothesized improvement, we quantitatively deconstructed two commonly used RAs from a United States CW agency. We trained classifier models to compare the predictive validity of RAs with and without casenote narratives and applied computational text analysis on casenotes to highlight topics uncovered in the casenotes. Our study finds that common risk metrics used to assess families and build CWS predictive risk models (PRMs) are unable to predict discharge outcomes for children who are not reunified with their birth parent(s). We also find that although casenotes cannot predict discharge outcomes, they contain contextual case signals. Given the lack of predictive validity of RA scores and casenotes, we propose moving beyond quantitative risk assessments for public sector algorithms and towards using contextual sources of information such as narratives to study public sociotechnical systems.<|reference_end|>
@article{moon2024beyond,
    title={Beyond Predictive Algorithms in Child Welfare},
    author={Erina Seh-Young Moon, Devansh Saxena, Tegan Maharaj, Shion Guha},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05573},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2403.05573},
    primaryClass={cs.CY cs.HC cs.LG}
}