Unlocking Varied Perspectives: A Persona-Based Multi-Agent Framework with Debate-Driven Text Planning for Argument Generation
<|reference_start|>Unlocking Varied Perspectives: A Persona-Based Multi-Agent Framework with Debate-Driven Text Planning for Argument Generation: Writing persuasive arguments is a challenging task for both humans and machines. It entails incorporating high-level beliefs from various perspectives on the topic, along with deliberate reasoning and planning to construct a coherent narrative. Current language models often generate surface tokens autoregressively, lacking explicit integration of these underlying controls, resulting in limited output diversity and coherence. In this work, we propose a persona-based multi-agent framework for argument writing. Inspired by the human debate, we first assign each agent a persona representing its high-level beliefs from a unique perspective, and then design an agent interaction process so that the agents can collaboratively debate and discuss the idea to form an overall plan for argument writing. Such debate process enables fluid and nonlinear development of ideas. We evaluate our framework on argumentative essay writing. The results show that our framework can generate more diverse and persuasive arguments through both automatic and human evaluations.<|reference_end|>
@article{hu2024debate-to-write:,
    title={Debate-to-Write: A Persona-Driven Multi-Agent Framework for Diverse
  Argument Generation},
    author={Zhe Hu, Hou Pong Chan, Jing Li, Yu Yin},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.19643},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2406.19643},
    primaryClass={cs.CL cs.AI}
}