Extensional and Non-extensional Functions as Processes
<|reference_start|>Extensional and Non-extensional Functions as Processes: Following Milner's seminal paper, the representation of functions as processes has received considerable attention. For pure $\lambda$-calculus, the process representations yield (at best) non-extensional $\lambda $-theories (i.e., $\beta$ rule holds, whereas $\eta$ does not).   In the paper, we study how to obtain extensional representations, and how to move between extensional and non-extensional representations. Using Internal $\pi$, $\mathrm{I}\pi$ (a subset of the $\pi$-calculus in which all outputs are bound), we develop a refinement of Milner's original encoding of functions as processes that is parametric on certain abstract components called wires. These are, intuitively, processes whose task is to connect two end-point channels. We show that when a few algebraic properties of wires hold, the encoding yields a $\lambda$-theory. Exploiting the symmetries and dualities of $\mathrm{I}\pi$, we isolate three main classes of wires. The first two have a sequential behaviour and are dual of each other; the third has a parallel behaviour and is the dual of itself. We show the adoption of the parallel wires yields an extensional $\lambda$-theory; in fact, it yields an equality that coincides with that of B\"ohm trees with infinite $\eta$. In contrast, the other two classes of wires yield non-extensional $\lambda$-theories whose equalities are those of the L\'evy-Longo and B\"ohm trees.<|reference_end|>
@article{sakayori2024extensional,
    title={Extensional and Non-extensional Functions as Processes},
    author={Ken Sakayori, Davide Sangiorgi},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.03536},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2405.03536},
    primaryClass={cs.LO cs.PL}
}