What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Study
<|reference_start|>What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Study: Gender bias in machine translation (MT) is recognized as an issue that can harm people and society. And yet, advancements in the field rarely involve people, the final MT users, or inform how they might be impacted by biased technologies. Current evaluations are often restricted to automatic methods, which offer an opaque estimate of what the downstream impact of gender disparities might be. We conduct an extensive human-centered study to examine if and to what extent bias in MT brings harms with tangible costs, such as quality of service gaps across women and men. To this aim, we collect behavioral data from 90 participants, who post-edited MT outputs to ensure correct gender translation. Across multiple datasets, languages, and types of users, our study shows that feminine post-editing demands significantly more technical and temporal effort, also corresponding to higher financial costs. Existing bias measurements, however, fail to reflect the found disparities. Our findings advocate for human-centered approaches that can inform the societal impact of bias.<|reference_end|>
@article{savoldi2024what,
    title={What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine
  Translation with a Human-centered Study},
    author={Beatrice Savoldi and Sara Papi and Matteo Negri and Ana Guerberof and
  Luisa Bentivogli},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.00545},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2410.00545},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}