Can LLMs Beat Humans in Debating? A Dynamic Multi-agent Framework for Competitive Debate
<|reference_start|>Can LLMs Beat Humans in Debating? A Dynamic Multi-agent Framework for Competitive Debate: Competitive debate is a complex task of computational argumentation. Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer from hallucinations and lack competitiveness in this field. To address these challenges, we introduce Agent for Debate (Agent4Debate), a dynamic multi-agent framework based on LLMs designed to enhance their capabilities in competitive debate. Drawing inspiration from human behavior in debate preparation and execution, Agent4Debate employs a collaborative architecture where four specialized agents, involving Searcher, Analyzer, Writer, and Reviewer, dynamically interact and cooperate. These agents work throughout the debate process, covering multiple stages from initial research and argument formulation to rebuttal and summary. To comprehensively evaluate framework performance, we construct the Competitive Debate Arena, comprising 66 carefully selected Chinese debate motions. We recruit ten experienced human debaters and collect records of 200 debates involving Agent4Debate, baseline models, and humans. The evaluation employs the Debatrix automatic scoring system and professional human reviewers based on the established Debatrix-Elo and Human-Elo ranking. Experimental results indicate that the state-of-the-art Agent4Debate exhibits capabilities comparable to those of humans. Furthermore, ablation studies demonstrate the effectiveness of each component in the agent structure.<|reference_end|>
@article{zhang2024can,
    title={Can LLMs Beat Humans in Debating? A Dynamic Multi-agent Framework for
  Competitive Debate},
    author={Yiqun Zhang, Xiaocui Yang, Shi Feng, Daling Wang, Yifei Zhang, Kaisong
  Song},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.04472},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2408.04472},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}