Search-based versus Sampling-based Robot Motion Planning: A Comparative Study
<|reference_start|>Search-based versus Sampling-based Robot Motion Planning: A Comparative Study: Robot motion planning is a challenging domain as it involves dealing with high-dimensional and continuous search space. In past decades, a wide variety of planning algorithms have been developed to tackle this problem, sometimes in isolation without comparing to each other. In this study, we benchmark two such prominent types of algorithms: OMPL's sampling-based RRT-Connect and SMPL's search-based ARA* with motion primitives. To compare these two fundamentally different approaches fairly, we adapt them to ensure the same planning conditions and benchmark them on the same set of planning scenarios. Our findings suggest that sampling-based planners like RRT-Connect show more consistent performance across the board in high-dimensional spaces, whereas search-based planners like ARA* have the capacity to perform significantly better when used with a suitable action-space sampling scheme. Through this study, we hope to showcase the effort required to properly benchmark motion planners from different paradigms thereby contributing to a more nuanced understanding of their capabilities and limitations. The code is available at https://github.com/gsotirchos/benchmarking_planners<|reference_end|>
@article{sotirchos2024search-based,
    title={Search-based versus Sampling-based Robot Motion Planning: A Comparative
  Study},
    author={Georgios Sotirchos, Zlatan Ajanovic},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09623},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2406.09623},
    primaryClass={cs.RO}
}