WildFeedback: Aligning LLMs With In-situ User Interactions And Feedback
<|reference_start|>WildFeedback: Aligning LLMs With In-situ User Interactions And Feedback: As large language models (LLMs) continue to advance, aligning these models with human preferences has emerged as a critical challenge. Traditional alignment methods, relying on human or LLM annotated datasets, are limited by their resource-intensive nature, inherent subjectivity, and the risk of feedback loops that amplify model biases. To overcome these limitations, we introduce WildFeedback, a novel framework that leverages real-time, in-situ user interactions to create preference datasets that more accurately reflect authentic human values. WildFeedback operates through a three-step process: feedback signal identification, preference data construction, and user-guided evaluation. We applied this framework to a large corpus of user-LLM conversations, resulting in a rich preference dataset that reflects genuine user preferences. This dataset captures the nuances of user preferences by identifying and classifying feedback signals within natural conversations, thereby enabling the construction of more representative and context-sensitive alignment data. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that LLMs fine-tuned on WildFeedback exhibit significantly improved alignment with user preferences, as evidenced by both traditional benchmarks and our proposed user-guided evaluation. By incorporating real-time feedback from actual users, WildFeedback addresses the scalability, subjectivity, and bias challenges that plague existing approaches, marking a significant step toward developing LLMs that are more responsive to the diverse and evolving needs of their users. In summary, WildFeedback offers a robust, scalable solution for aligning LLMs with true human values, setting a new standard for the development and evaluation of user-centric language models.<|reference_end|>
@article{shi2024wildfeedback:,
    title={WildFeedback: Aligning LLMs With In-situ User Interactions And Feedback},
    author={Taiwei Shi, Zhuoer Wang, Longqi Yang, Ying-Chun Lin, Zexue He,
  Mengting Wan, Pei Zhou, Sujay Jauhar, Xiaofeng Xu, Xia Song, Jennifer Neville},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.15549},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2408.15549},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}