Measuring memorization in RLHF for code completion
<|reference_start|>Measuring memorization in RLHF for code completion: Reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) has become the dominant method to align large models to user preferences. Unlike fine-tuning, for which there are many studies regarding training data memorization, it is not clear how memorization is affected by or introduced in the RLHF alignment process. Understanding this relationship is important as real user data may be collected and used to align large models; if user data is memorized during RLHF and later regurgitated, this could raise privacy concerns. In this work, we analyze how training data memorization can surface and propagate through each phase of RLHF. We focus our study on code completion models, as code completion is one of the most popular use cases for large language models. We find that RLHF significantly decreases the chance that data used for reward modeling and reinforcement learning is memorized, in comparison to aligning via directly fine-tuning on this data, but that examples already memorized during the fine-tuning stage of RLHF, will, in the majority of cases, remain memorized after RLHF.<|reference_end|>
@article{pappu2024measuring,
    title={Measuring memorization in RLHF for code completion},
    author={Aneesh Pappu, Billy Porter, Ilia Shumailov, Jamie Hayes},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11715},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2406.11715},
    primaryClass={cs.LG cs.CL cs.SE}
}