CodeMind: A Framework to Challenge Large Language Models for Code Reasoning
<|reference_start|>CodeMind: A Framework to Challenge Large Language Models for Code Reasoning: Solely relying on test passing to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) for code synthesis may result in unfair assessment or promoting models with data leakage. As an alternative, we introduce CodeMind, a framework designed to gauge the code reasoning abilities of LLMs. CodeMind currently supports three code reasoning tasks: Independent Execution Reasoning (IER), Dependent Execution Reasoning (DER), and Specification Reasoning (SR). The first two evaluate models to predict the execution output of an arbitrary code or code the model could correctly synthesize. The third one evaluates the extent to which LLMs implement the specified expected behavior.   Our extensive evaluation of nine LLMs across five benchmarks in two different programming languages using CodeMind shows that LLMs fairly follow control flow constructs and, in general, explain how inputs evolve to output, specifically for simple programs and the ones they can correctly synthesize. However, their performance drops for code with higher complexity, non-trivial logical and arithmetic operators, non-primitive types, and API calls. Furthermore, we observe that, while correlated, specification reasoning (essential for code synthesis) does not imply execution reasoning (essential for broader programming tasks such as testing and debugging): ranking LLMs based on test passing can be different compared to code reasoning.<|reference_end|>
@article{liu2024codemind:,
    title={CodeMind: A Framework to Challenge Large Language Models for Code
  Reasoning},
    author={Changshu Liu, Shizhuo Dylan Zhang, Ali Reza Ibrahimzada, Reyhaneh
  Jabbarvand},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.09664},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2402.09664},
    primaryClass={cs.SE cs.AI cs.CL cs.PL}
}