Towards a Realistic Long-Term Benchmark for Open-Web Research Agents
<|reference_start|>Towards a Realistic Long-Term Benchmark for Open-Web Research Agents: We present initial results of a forthcoming benchmark for evaluating LLM agents on white-collar tasks of economic value. We evaluate agents on real-world "messy" open-web research tasks of the type that are routine in finance and consulting. In doing so, we lay the groundwork for an LLM agent evaluation suite where good performance directly corresponds to a large economic and societal impact. We built and tested several agent architectures with o1-preview, GPT-4o, Claude-3.5 Sonnet, Llama 3.1 (405b), and GPT-4o-mini. On average, LLM agents powered by Claude-3.5 Sonnet and o1-preview substantially outperformed agents using GPT-4o, with agents based on Llama 3.1 (405b) and GPT-4o-mini lagging noticeably behind. Across LLMs, a ReAct architecture with the ability to delegate subtasks to subagents performed best. In addition to quantitative evaluations, we qualitatively assessed the performance of the LLM agents by inspecting their traces and reflecting on their observations. Our evaluation represents the first in-depth assessment of agents' abilities to conduct challenging, economically valuable analyst-style research on the real open web.<|reference_end|>
@article{mühlbacher2024towards,
    title={Towards a Realistic Long-Term Benchmark for Open-Web Research Agents},
    author={Peter M"uhlbacher, Nikos I. Bosse, Lawrence Phillips},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.14913},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2409.14913},
    primaryClass={cs.CL cs.IR cs.LG}
}