A global approach for the redefinition of higher-order flexibility and rigidity
<|reference_start|>A global approach for the redefinition of higher-order flexibility and rigidity: The famous example of the double-Watt mechanism given by Connelly and Servatius raises some problems concerning the classical definitions of higher-order flexibility and rigidity, respectively, as they attest the cusp configuration of the mechanism a third-order rigidity, which conflicts with its continuous flexion. Some attempts were done to resolve the dilemma but they could not settle the problem. As cusp mechanisms demonstrate the basic shortcoming of any local mobility analysis using higher-order constraints, we present a global approach inspired by Sabitov's finite algorithm for testing the bendability of a polyhedron, which allows us (a) to compute iteratively configurations with a higher-order flexion and (b) to come up with a proper redefinition of higher-order flexibility and rigidity. The presented approach is demonstrated on several examples (double-Watt mechanisms and Tarnai's Leonardo structure). Moreover, we determine all configurations of a given 3-RPR manipulator with a third-order flexion and present a corresponding joint-bar framework of flexion order 23.<|reference_end|>
@article{nawratil2024a,
    title={A global approach for the redefinition of higher-order flexibility and
  rigidity},
    author={Georg Nawratil},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.15447},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2405.15447},
    primaryClass={math.AG cs.RO}
}