Are ELECTRA's Sentence Embeddings Beyond Repair? The Case of Semantic Textual Similarity
<|reference_start|>Are ELECTRA's Sentence Embeddings Beyond Repair? The Case of Semantic Textual Similarity: While BERT produces high-quality sentence embeddings, its pre-training computational cost is a significant drawback. In contrast, ELECTRA provides a cost-effective pre-training objective and downstream task performance improvements, but worse sentence embeddings. The community tacitly stopped utilizing ELECTRA's sentence embeddings for semantic textual similarity (STS). We notice a significant drop in performance for the ELECTRA discriminator's last layer in comparison to prior layers. We explore this drop and propose a way to repair the embeddings using a novel truncated model fine-tuning (TMFT) method. TMFT improves the Spearman correlation coefficient by over $8$ points while increasing parameter efficiency on the STS Benchmark. We extend our analysis to various model sizes, languages, and two other tasks. Further, we discover the surprising efficacy of ELECTRA's generator model, which performs on par with BERT, using significantly fewer parameters and a substantially smaller embedding size. Finally, we observe boosts by combining TMFT with word similarity or domain adaptive pre-training.<|reference_end|>
@article{rep2024are,
    title={Are ELECTRA's Sentence Embeddings Beyond Repair? The Case of Semantic
  Textual Similarity},
    author={Ivan Rep, David Duki'c, Jan v{S}najder},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13130},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2402.13130},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}