COBias and Debias: Minimizing Language Model Pairwise Accuracy Bias via Nonlinear Integer Programming
<|reference_start|>COBias and Debias: Minimizing Language Model Pairwise Accuracy Bias via Nonlinear Integer Programming: For language model classification, would you prefer having only one workable class or having every class working? The latter makes more practical uses. Especially for large language models (LLMs), the fact that they achieve a fair overall accuracy by in-context learning (ICL) obscures a large difference in individual class accuracies. In this work, we uncover and tackle language models' imbalance in per-class prediction accuracy by reconceptualizing it as the Contextual Oddity Bias (COBias), and we are the first to engage nonlinear integer programming (NIP) to debias it. Briefly, COBias refers to the difference in accuracy by a class A compared to its ''odd'' class, which holds the majority wrong predictions of class A. With the COBias metric, we reveal that LLMs of varied scales and families exhibit large per-class accuracy differences. Then we propose Debiasing as Nonlinear Integer Programming (DNIP) to correct ICL per-class probabilities for lower bias and higher overall accuracy. Our optimization objective is directly based on the evaluation scores by COBias and accuracy metrics, solved by simulated annealing. Evaluations on three LLMs across seven NLP classification tasks show that DNIP simultaneously achieves significant COBias reduction ($-27\%$) and accuracy improvement ($+12\%$) over the conventional ICL approach, suggesting that modeling pairwise class accuracy differences is a direction in pushing forward more accurate, more reliable LLM predictions.<|reference_end|>
@article{lin2024cobias,
    title={COBias and Debias: Minimizing Language Model Pairwise Accuracy Bias via
  Nonlinear Integer Programming},
    author={Ruixi Lin, Yang You},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.07623},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2405.07623},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}