Early-Stage Anomaly Detection: A Study of Model Performance on Complete vs Partial Flows
<|reference_start|>Early-Stage Anomaly Detection: A Study of Model Performance on Complete vs Partial Flows: This study investigates the efficacy of machine learning models, specifically Random Forest, in anomaly detection systems when trained on complete flow records and tested on partial flow data. We explore the performance disparity that arises when models are applied to incomplete data typical in real-world, real-time network environments. Our findings demonstrate a significant decline in model performance, with precision and recall dropping by up to 30\% under certain conditions when models trained on complete flows are tested against partial flows. Conversely, models trained and tested on consistently complete or partial datasets maintain robustness, highlighting the importance of dataset consistency in training. The study reveals that a minimum of 7 packets in the test set is required for maintaining reliable detection rates. These results underscore the need for tailored training strategies that can effectively adapt to the dynamics of partial data, enhancing the practical applicability of anomaly detection systems in operational settings.<|reference_end|>
@article{pekar2024early-stage,
    title={Early-Stage Anomaly Detection: A Study of Model Performance on Complete
  vs. Partial Flows},
    author={Adrian Pekar and Richard Jozsa},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.02856},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2407.02856},
    primaryClass={cs.LG cs.CR}
}