On Zero-Shot Counterspeech Generation by LLMs
<|reference_start|>On Zero-Shot Counterspeech Generation by LLMs: With the emergence of numerous Large Language Models (LLM), the usage of such models in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) applications is increasing extensively. Counterspeech generation is one such key task where efforts are made to develop generative models by fine-tuning LLMs with hatespeech - counterspeech pairs, but none of these attempts explores the intrinsic properties of large language models in zero-shot settings. In this work, we present a comprehensive analysis of the performances of four LLMs namely GPT-2, DialoGPT, ChatGPT and FlanT5 in zero-shot settings for counterspeech generation, which is the first of its kind. For GPT-2 and DialoGPT, we further investigate the deviation in performance with respect to the sizes (small, medium, large) of the models. On the other hand, we propose three different prompting strategies for generating different types of counterspeech and analyse the impact of such strategies on the performance of the models. Our analysis shows that there is an improvement in generation quality for two datasets (17%), however the toxicity increase (25%) with increase in model size. Considering type of model, GPT-2 and FlanT5 models are significantly better in terms of counterspeech quality but also have high toxicity as compared to DialoGPT. ChatGPT are much better at generating counter speech than other models across all metrics. In terms of prompting, we find that our proposed strategies help in improving counter speech generation across all the models.<|reference_end|>
@article{saha2024on,
    title={On Zero-Shot Counterspeech Generation by LLMs},
    author={Punyajoy Saha, Aalok Agrawal, Abhik Jana, Chris Biemann, Animesh
  Mukherjee},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14938},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2403.14938},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}