CiteME: Can Language Models Accurately Cite Scientific Claims?
<|reference_start|>CiteME: Can Language Models Accurately Cite Scientific Claims?: Thousands of new scientific papers are published each month. Such information overload complicates researcher efforts to stay current with the state-of-the-art as well as to verify and correctly attribute claims. We pose the following research question: Given a text excerpt referencing a paper, could an LM act as a research assistant to correctly identify the referenced paper? We advance efforts to answer this question by building a benchmark that evaluates the abilities of LMs in citation attribution. Our benchmark, CiteME, consists of text excerpts from recent machine learning papers, each referencing a single other paper. CiteME use reveals a large gap between frontier LMs and human performance, with LMs achieving only 4.2-18.5% accuracy and humans 69.7%. We close this gap by introducing CiteAgent, an autonomous system built on the GPT-4o LM that can also search and read papers, which achieves an accuracy of 35.3\% on CiteME. Overall, CiteME serves as a challenging testbed for open-ended claim attribution, driving the research community towards a future where any claim made by an LM can be automatically verified and discarded if found to be incorrect.<|reference_end|>
@article{press2024citeme:,
    title={CiteME: Can Language Models Accurately Cite Scientific Claims?},
    author={Ori Press, Andreas Hochlehnert, Ameya Prabhu, Vishaal Udandarao, Ofir
  Press, Matthias Bethge},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.12861},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2407.12861},
    primaryClass={cs.CL cs.AI cs.HC}
}