PRobELM: Plausibility Ranking Evaluation for Language Models
<|reference_start|>PRobELM: Plausibility Ranking Evaluation for Language Models: This paper introduces PRobELM (Plausibility Ranking Evaluation for Language Models), a benchmark designed to assess language models' ability to discern more plausible from less plausible scenarios through their parametric knowledge. While benchmarks such as TruthfulQA emphasise factual accuracy or truthfulness, and others such as COPA explore plausible scenarios without explicitly incorporating world knowledge, PRobELM seeks to bridge this gap by evaluating models' capabilities to prioritise plausible scenarios that leverage world knowledge over less plausible alternatives. This design allows us to assess the potential of language models for downstream use cases such as literature-based discovery where the focus is on identifying information that is likely but not yet known. Our benchmark is constructed from a dataset curated from Wikidata edit histories, tailored to align the temporal bounds of the training data for the evaluated models. PRobELM facilitates the evaluation of language models across multiple prompting types, including statement, text completion, and question-answering. Experiments with 10 models of various sizes and architectures on the relationship between model scales, training recency, and plausibility performance, reveal that factual accuracy does not directly correlate with plausibility performance and that up-to-date training data enhances plausibility assessment across different model architectures.<|reference_end|>
@article{yuan2024probelm:,
    title={PRobELM: Plausibility Ranking Evaluation for Language Models},
    author={Zhangdie Yuan, Eric Chamoun, Rami Aly, Chenxi Whitehouse and Andreas
  Vlachos},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.03818},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2404.03818},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}