Bias Mitigation via Compensation: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective
<|reference_start|>Bias Mitigation via Compensation: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective: As AI increasingly integrates with human decision-making, we must carefully consider interactions between the two. In particular, current approaches focus on optimizing individual agent actions but often overlook the nuances of collective intelligence. Group dynamics might require that one agent (e.g., the AI system) compensate for biases and errors in another agent (e.g., the human), but this compensation should be carefully developed. We provide a theoretical framework for algorithmic compensation that synthesizes game theory and reinforcement learning principles to demonstrate the natural emergence of deceptive outcomes from the continuous learning dynamics of agents. We provide simulation results involving Markov Decision Processes (MDP) learning to interact. This work then underpins our ethical analysis of the conditions in which AI agents should adapt to biases and behaviors of other agents in dynamic and complex decision-making environments. Overall, our approach addresses the nuanced role of strategic deception of humans, challenging previous assumptions about its detrimental effects. We assert that compensation for others' biases can enhance coordination and ethical alignment: strategic deception, when ethically managed, can positively shape human-AI interactions.<|reference_end|>
@article{swaminathan2024ai,,
    title={AI, Pluralism, and (Social) Compensation},
    author={Nandhini Swaminathan and David Danks},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.19256},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2404.19256},
    primaryClass={cs.AI cs.CY cs.GT cs.HC cs.LG cs.MA}
}