Judgment of Thoughts: Courtroom of the Binary Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models
<|reference_start|>Judgment of Thoughts: Courtroom of the Binary Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models: This paper proposes a novel prompt engineering technique called Judgment of Thought (JoT) that is specifically tailored for binary logical reasoning tasks. JoT employs three roles$\unicode{x2014}$lawyer, prosecutor, and judge$\unicode{x2014}$to facilitate more reliable and accurate reasoning by the model. In this framework, the judge utilizes a high$\unicode{x2010}$level model, while the lawyer and prosecutor utilize low$\unicode{x2010}$level models. This structure helps the judge better understand the responses from both the lawyer and prosecutor, enabling a more accurate judgment. Experimental results on large language model (LLM) benchmark datasets, such as BigBenchHard and Winogrande, demonstrate that JoT outperforms existing methods, including Chain of Thought (CoT) and Self$\unicode{x2010}$Consistency (SC), in binary logical reasoning tasks. Additionally, in real$\unicode{x2010}$world tasks, such as Fake News Detection and SMS Spam Detection, JoT shows comparable or improved performance compared to existing techniques. JoT significantly enhances the accuracy and reliability of models in binary reasoning tasks and show potential for practical applicability across various domains. Future research should aim to further broaden the applicability of JoT and optimize its implementation for real$\unicode{x2010}$world problem$\unicode{x2010}$solving.<|reference_end|>
@article{park2024judgment,
    title={Judgment of Thoughts: Courtroom of the Binary Logical Reasoning in Large
  Language Models},
    author={Sungjune Park and Daeseon Choi},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16635},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2409.16635},
    primaryClass={cs.AI}
}