When Your AIs Deceive You: Challenges of Partial Observability in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
<|reference_start|>When Your AIs Deceive You: Challenges of Partial Observability in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: Past analyses of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) assume that the human evaluators fully observe the environment. What happens when human feedback is based only on partial observations? We formally define two failure cases: deceptive inflation and overjustification. Modeling the human as Boltzmann-rational w.r.t. a belief over trajectories, we prove conditions under which RLHF is guaranteed to result in policies that deceptively inflate their performance, overjustify their behavior to make an impression, or both. Under the new assumption that the human's partial observability is known and accounted for, we then analyze how much information the feedback process provides about the return function. We show that sometimes, the human's feedback determines the return function uniquely up to an additive constant, but in other realistic cases, there is irreducible ambiguity. We propose exploratory research directions to help tackle these challenges and caution against blindly applying RLHF in partially observable settings.<|reference_end|>
@article{lang2024when,
    title={When Your AIs Deceive You: Challenges of Partial Observability in
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback},
    author={Leon Lang, Davis Foote, Stuart Russell, Anca Dragan, Erik Jenner,
  Scott Emmons},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17747},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2402.17747},
    primaryClass={cs.LG cs.AI stat.ML}
}