Causal Equal Protection as Algorithmic Fairness
<|reference_start|>Causal Equal Protection as Algorithmic Fairness: By combining the philosophical literature on statistical evidence and the interdisciplinary literature on algorithmic fairness, we revisit recent objections against classification parity in light of causal analyses of algorithmic fairness and the distinction between predictive and diagnostic evidence. We focus on trial proceedings as a black-box classification algorithm in which defendants are sorted into two groups by convicting or acquitting them. We defend a novel principle, causal equal protection, that combines classification parity with the causal approach. In the do-calculus, causal equal protection requires that individuals should not be subject to uneven risks of classification error because of their protected or socially salient characteristics. The explicit use of protected characteristics, however, may be required if it equalizes these risks.<|reference_end|>
@article{di bello2024causal,
    title={Causal Equal Protection as Algorithmic Fairness},
    author={Marcello Di Bello, Nicol`o Cangiotti, Michele Loi},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.12062},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2402.12062},
    primaryClass={cs.CY cs.AI cs.DS cs.LG}
}