Addressing Polarization and Unfairness in Performative Prediction
<|reference_start|>Addressing Polarization and Unfairness in Performative Prediction: When machine learning (ML) models are used in applications that involve humans (e.g., online recommendation, school admission, hiring, lending), the model itself may trigger changes in the distribution of targeted data it aims to predict. Performative prediction (PP) is a framework that explicitly considers such model-dependent distribution shifts when learning ML models. While significant efforts have been devoted to finding performative stable (PS) solutions in PP for system robustness, their societal implications are less explored and it is unclear whether PS solutions are aligned with social norms such as fairness. In this paper, we set out to examine the fairness property of PS solutions in performative prediction. We first show that PS solutions can incur severe polarization effects and group-wise loss disparity. Although existing fairness mechanisms commonly used in literature can help mitigate unfairness, they may fail and disrupt the stability under model-dependent distribution shifts. We thus propose novel fairness intervention mechanisms that can simultaneously achieve both stability and fairness in PP settings. Both theoretical analysis and experiments are provided to validate the proposed method.<|reference_end|>
@article{jin2024addressing,
    title={Addressing Polarization and Unfairness in Performative Prediction},
    author={Kun Jin, Tian Xie, Yang Liu, Xueru Zhang},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.16756},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2406.16756},
    primaryClass={cs.LG cs.AI cs.CY}
}