Hybrid Preference Optimization: Augmenting Direct Preference Optimization with Auxiliary Objectives
<|reference_start|>Hybrid Preference Optimization: Augmenting Direct Preference Optimization with Auxiliary Objectives: For aligning large language models (LLMs), prior work has leveraged reinforcement learning via human feedback (RLHF) or variations of direct preference optimization (DPO). While DPO offers a simpler framework based on maximum likelihood estimation, it compromises on the ability to tune language models to easily maximize non-differentiable and non-binary objectives according to the LLM designer's preferences (e.g., using simpler language or minimizing specific kinds of harmful content). These may neither align with user preferences nor even be able to be captured tractably by binary preference data. To leverage the simplicity and performance of DPO with the generalizability of RL, we propose a hybrid approach between DPO and RLHF. With a simple augmentation to the implicit reward decomposition of DPO, we allow for tuning LLMs to maximize a set of arbitrary auxiliary rewards using offline RL. The proposed method, Hybrid Preference Optimization (HPO), shows the ability to effectively generalize to both user preferences and auxiliary designer objectives, while preserving alignment performance across a range of challenging benchmarks and model sizes.<|reference_end|>
@article{badrinath2024hybrid,
    title={Hybrid Preference Optimization: Augmenting Direct Preference
  Optimization with Auxiliary Objectives},
    author={Anirudhan Badrinath, Prabhat Agarwal, Jiajing Xu},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17956},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2405.17956},
    primaryClass={cs.AI}
}