Finite-Choice Logic Programming
<|reference_start|>Finite-Choice Logic Programming: Logic programming, as exemplified by datalog, defines the meaning of a program as the canonical smallest model derived from deductive closure over its inference rules. However, many problems call for an enumeration of models that vary along some set of choices while maintaining structural and logical constraints -- there is no single canonical model. The notion of stable models has successfully captured programmer intuition about the set of valid solutions for such problems, giving rise to a family of programming languages and associated solvers collectively known as answer set programming. Unfortunately, the definition of a stable model is frustratingly indirect, especially in the presence of rules containing free variables.   We propose a new formalism, called finite-choice logic programing, for which the set of stable models can be characterized as the least fixed point of an immediate consequence operator. Our formalism allows straightforward expression of common idioms in both datalog and answer set programming, gives meaning to a new and useful class of programs, enjoys a constructive and direct operational semantics, and admits a predictive cost semantics, which we demonstrate through our implementation.<|reference_end|>
@article{martens2024finite-choice,
    title={Finite-Choice Logic Programming},
    author={Chris Martens, Robert J. Simmons, Michael Arntzenius},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.19040},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2405.19040},
    primaryClass={cs.PL cs.LO}
}