A Hybrid Intelligence Method for Argument Mining
<|reference_start|>A Hybrid Intelligence Method for Argument Mining: Large-scale survey tools enable the collection of citizen feedback in opinion corpora. Extracting the key arguments from a large and noisy set of opinions helps in understanding the opinions quickly and accurately. Fully automated methods can extract arguments but (1) require large labeled datasets that induce large annotation costs and (2) work well for known viewpoints, but not for novel points of view. We propose HyEnA, a hybrid (human + AI) method for extracting arguments from opinionated texts, combining the speed of automated processing with the understanding and reasoning capabilities of humans. We evaluate HyEnA on three citizen feedback corpora. We find that, on the one hand, HyEnA achieves higher coverage and precision than a state-of-the-art automated method when compared to a common set of diverse opinions, justifying the need for human insight. On the other hand, HyEnA requires less human effort and does not compromise quality compared to (fully manual) expert analysis, demonstrating the benefit of combining human and artificial intelligence.<|reference_end|>
@article{van der meer2024a,
    title={A Hybrid Intelligence Method for Argument Mining},
    author={Michiel van der Meer, Enrico Liscio, Catholijn M. Jonker, Aske Plaat,
  Piek Vossen, Pradeep K. Murukannaiah},
    journal={Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR), 80:1187-1222,
  2024},
    year={2024},
    doi={10.1613/jair.1.15135},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2403.09713},
    primaryClass={cs.AI cs.CL cs.HC}
}