Understanding the Difficulty of Solving Cauchy Problems with PINNs
<|reference_start|>Understanding the Difficulty of Solving Cauchy Problems with PINNs: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have gained popularity in scientific computing in recent years. However, they often fail to achieve the same level of accuracy as classical methods in solving differential equations. In this paper, we identify two sources of this issue in the case of Cauchy problems: the use of $L^2$ residuals as objective functions and the approximation gap of neural networks. We show that minimizing the sum of $L^2$ residual and initial condition error is not sufficient to guarantee the true solution, as this loss function does not capture the underlying dynamics. Additionally, neural networks are not capable of capturing singularities in the solutions due to the non-compactness of their image sets. This, in turn, influences the existence of global minima and the regularity of the network. We demonstrate that when the global minimum does not exist, machine precision becomes the predominant source of achievable error in practice. We also present numerical experiments in support of our theoretical claims.<|reference_end|>
@article{wang2024understanding,
    title={Understanding the Difficulty of Solving Cauchy Problems with PINNs},
    author={Tao Wang, Bo Zhao, Sicun Gao and Rose Yu},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.02561},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2405.02561},
    primaryClass={cs.LG cs.NA math.NA}
}