Do CLIPs Always Generalize Better than ImageNet Models?
<|reference_start|>Do CLIPs Always Generalize Better than ImageNet Models?: Large vision language models, such as CLIPs, have revolutionized modern machine learning. CLIPs have demonstrated great generalizability under distribution shifts, supported by an increasing body of literature. However, the evaluation datasets for CLIPs are variations primarily designed for ImageNet benchmarks, which may not fully reflect the extent to which CLIPs, e.g., pre-trained on LAION, robust to spurious correlations. To bridge the gap, we collect a real-world dataset called CounterAnimal that contains realistic spurious features found in animal photos. CounterAnimal consists of a) the common group: comprising animals on common backgrounds, and b) the counter group: including animals on unusual backgrounds. The performance drops from the common to counter groups quantify the reliance of models on spurious features (i.e., backgrounds) to predict the animals. We find that CLIPs trained on either LAION or the OpenAI data exhibit notable performance drops on the counter group. Surprisingly, we observe that single-modal models trained on ImageNet are more robust than CLIPs. We provide both theoretical and empirical explanations for why CLIPs still learn spurious features. Our findings suggest that distribution shifts remain an open problem for CLIPs, and one needs to be cautious about test setups when evaluating foundation models pre-trained on a significantly different scale and distribution.<|reference_end|>
@article{wang2024a,
    title={A Sober Look at the Robustness of CLIPs to Spurious Features},
    author={Qizhou Wang, Yong Lin, Yongqiang Chen, Ludwig Schmidt, Bo Han, Tong
  Zhang},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.11497},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2403.11497},
    primaryClass={cs.CV cs.LG stat.ML}
}