Toward Constraint Compliant Goal Formulation and Planning
<|reference_start|>Toward Constraint Compliant Goal Formulation and Planning: One part of complying with norms, rules, and preferences is incorporating constraints (such as knowledge of ethics) into one's goal formulation and planning processing. We explore in a simple domain how the encoding of knowledge in different ethical frameworks influences an agent's goal formulation and planning processing and demonstrate ability of an agent to satisfy and satisfice when its collection of relevant constraints includes a mix of "hard" and "soft" constraints of various types. How the agent attempts to comply with ethical constraints depends on the ethical framing and we investigate tradeoffs between deontological framing and utilitarian framing for complying with an ethical norm. Representative scenarios highlight how performing the same task with different framings of the same norm leads to different behaviors. Our explorations suggest an important role for metacognitive judgments in resolving ethical conflicts during goal formulation and planning.<|reference_end|>
@article{jones2024toward,
    title={Toward Constraint Compliant Goal Formulation and Planning},
    author={Steven J. Jones, Robert E. Wray},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12862},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2405.12862},
    primaryClass={cs.AI}
}