A SMART Mnemonic Sounds like "Glue Tonic": Mixing LLMs with Student Feedback to Make Mnemonic Learning Stick
<|reference_start|>A SMART Mnemonic Sounds like "Glue Tonic": Mixing LLMs with Student Feedback to Make Mnemonic Learning Stick: Keyword mnemonics are memorable explanations that link new terms to simpler keywords. Prior work generates mnemonics for students, but they do not train models using mnemonics students prefer and aid learning. We build SMART, a mnemonic generator trained on feedback from real students learning new terms. To train SMART, we first fine-tune LLaMA-2 on a curated set of user-written mnemonics. We then use LLM alignment to enhance SMART: we deploy mnemonics generated by SMART in a flashcard app to find preferences on mnemonics students favor. We gather 2684 preferences from 45 students across two types: expressed (inferred from ratings) and observed (inferred from student learning), yielding three key findings. First, expressed and observed preferences disagree; what students think is helpful does not always capture what is truly helpful. Second, Bayesian models can synthesize complementary data from multiple preference types into a single effectiveness signal. SMART is tuned via Direct Preference Optimization on this signal, which resolves ties and missing labels in the typical method of pairwise comparisons, augmenting data for LLM output quality gains. Third, mnemonic experts assess SMART as matching GPT-4 at much lower deployment costs, showing the utility of capturing diverse student feedback to align LLMs in education.<|reference_end|>
@article{balepur2024a,
    title={A SMART Mnemonic Sounds like "Glue Tonic": Mixing LLMs with Student
  Feedback to Make Mnemonic Learning Stick},
    author={Nishant Balepur, Matthew Shu, Alexander Hoyle, Alison Robey, Shi Feng,
  Seraphina Goldfarb-Tarrant, Jordan Boyd-Graber},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.15352},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2406.15352},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}