Model Reconstruction Using Counterfactual Explanations: Mitigating the Decision Boundary Shift
<|reference_start|>Model Reconstruction Using Counterfactual Explanations: Mitigating the Decision Boundary Shift: Counterfactual explanations find ways of achieving a favorable model outcome with minimum input perturbation. However, counterfactual explanations can also be exploited to steal the model by strategically training a surrogate model to give similar predictions as the original (target) model. In this work, we investigate model extraction by specifically leveraging the fact that the counterfactual explanations also lie quite close to the decision boundary. We propose a novel strategy for model extraction that we call Counterfactual Clamping Attack (CCA) which trains a surrogate model using a unique loss function that treats counterfactuals differently than ordinary instances. Our approach also alleviates the related problem of decision boundary shift that arises in existing model extraction attacks which treat counterfactuals as ordinary instances. We also derive novel mathematical relationships between the error in model approximation and the number of queries using polytope theory. Experimental results demonstrate that our strategy provides improved fidelity between the target and surrogate model predictions on several real world datasets.<|reference_end|>
@article{dissanayake2024model,
    title={Model Reconstruction Using Counterfactual Explanations: A Perspective
  From Polytope Theory},
    author={Pasan Dissanayake, Sanghamitra Dutta},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.05369},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2405.05369},
    primaryClass={cs.LG cs.CR cs.CY cs.IT math.IT stat.ML}
}