Beyond Accuracy: Investigating Error Types in GPT-4 Responses to USMLE Questions
<|reference_start|>Beyond Accuracy: Investigating Error Types in GPT-4 Responses to USMLE Questions: GPT-4 demonstrates high accuracy in medical QA tasks, leading with an accuracy of 86.70%, followed by Med-PaLM 2 at 86.50%. However, around 14% of errors remain. Additionally, current works use GPT-4 to only predict the correct option without providing any explanation and thus do not provide any insight into the thinking process and reasoning used by GPT-4 or other LLMs. Therefore, we introduce a new domain-specific error taxonomy derived from collaboration with medical students. Our GPT-4 USMLE Error (G4UE) dataset comprises 4153 GPT-4 correct responses and 919 incorrect responses to the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) respectively. These responses are quite long (258 words on average), containing detailed explanations from GPT-4 justifying the selected option. We then launch a large-scale annotation study using the Potato annotation platform and recruit 44 medical experts through Prolific, a well-known crowdsourcing platform. We annotated 300 out of these 919 incorrect data points at a granular level for different classes and created a multi-label span to identify the reasons behind the error. In our annotated dataset, a substantial portion of GPT-4's incorrect responses is categorized as a "Reasonable response by GPT-4," by annotators. This sheds light on the challenge of discerning explanations that may lead to incorrect options, even among trained medical professionals. We also provide medical concepts and medical semantic predications extracted using the SemRep tool for every data point. We believe that it will aid in evaluating the ability of LLMs to answer complex medical questions. We make the resources available at https://github.com/roysoumya/usmle-gpt4-error-taxonomy .<|reference_end|>
@article{roy2024beyond,
    title={Beyond Accuracy: Investigating Error Types in GPT-4 Responses to USMLE
  Questions},
    author={Soumyadeep Roy, Aparup Khatua, Fatemeh Ghoochani, Uwe Hadler, Wolfgang
  Nejdl, Niloy Ganguly},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.13307},
    year={2024},
    doi={10.1145/3626772.3657882},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2404.13307},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}