Universal Adversarial Triggers Are Not Universal
<|reference_start|>Universal Adversarial Triggers Are Not Universal: Recent work has developed optimization procedures to find token sequences, called adversarial triggers, which can elicit unsafe responses from aligned language models. These triggers are believed to be universally transferable, i.e., a trigger optimized on one model can jailbreak other models. In this paper, we concretely show that such adversarial triggers are not universal. We extensively investigate trigger transfer amongst 13 open models and observe inconsistent transfer. Our experiments further reveal a significant difference in robustness to adversarial triggers between models Aligned by Preference Optimization (APO) and models Aligned by Fine-Tuning (AFT). We find that APO models are extremely hard to jailbreak even when the trigger is optimized directly on the model. On the other hand, while AFT models may appear safe on the surface, exhibiting refusals to a range of unsafe instructions, we show that they are highly susceptible to adversarial triggers. Lastly, we observe that most triggers optimized on AFT models also generalize to new unsafe instructions from five diverse domains, further emphasizing their vulnerability. Overall, our work highlights the need for more comprehensive safety evaluations for aligned language models.<|reference_end|>
@article{meade2024universal,
    title={Universal Adversarial Triggers Are Not Universal},
    author={Nicholas Meade, Arkil Patel, Siva Reddy},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16020},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2404.16020},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}