What if?: Thinking Counterfactual Keywords Helps to Mitigate Hallucination in Large Multi-modal Models
<|reference_start|>What if?: Thinking Counterfactual Keywords Helps to Mitigate Hallucination in Large Multi-modal Models: This paper presents a way of enhancing the reliability of Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) in addressing hallucination, where the models generate cross-modal inconsistent responses. Without additional training, we propose Counterfactual Inception, a novel method that implants counterfactual thinking into LMMs using self-generated counterfactual keywords. Our method is grounded in the concept of counterfactual thinking, a cognitive process where human considers alternative realities, enabling more extensive context exploration. Bridging the human cognition mechanism into LMMs, we aim for the models to engage with and generate responses that span a wider contextual scene understanding, mitigating hallucinatory outputs. We further introduce Plausibility Verification Process (PVP), a simple yet robust keyword constraint that effectively filters out sub-optimal keywords to enable the consistent triggering of counterfactual thinking in the model responses. Comprehensive analyses across various LMMs, including both open-source and proprietary models, corroborate that counterfactual thinking significantly reduces hallucination and helps to broaden contextual understanding based on true visual clues.<|reference_end|>
@article{kim2024what,
    title={What if...?: Thinking Counterfactual Keywords Helps to Mitigate
  Hallucination in Large Multi-modal Models},
    author={Junho Kim, Yeon Ju Kim, Yong Man Ro},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.13513},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2403.13513},
    primaryClass={cs.CV cs.AI cs.CL}
}