An Actionability Assessment Tool for Explainable AI
<|reference_start|>An Actionability Assessment Tool for Explainable AI: In this paper, we introduce and evaluate a tool for researchers and practitioners to assess the actionability of information provided to users to support algorithmic recourse. While there are clear benefits of recourse from the user's perspective, the notion of actionability in explainable AI research remains vague, and claims of `actionable' explainability techniques are based on the researchers' intuition. Inspired by definitions and instruments for assessing actionability in other domains, we construct a seven-question tool and evaluate its effectiveness through two user studies. We show that the tool discriminates actionability across explanation types and that the distinctions align with human judgements. We show the impact of context on actionability assessments, suggesting that domain-specific tool adaptations may foster more human-centred algorithmic systems. This is a significant step forward for research and practices into actionable explainability and algorithmic recourse, providing the first clear human-centred definition and tool for assessing actionability in explainable AI.<|reference_end|>
@article{singh2024an,
    title={An Actionability Assessment Tool for Explainable AI},
    author={Ronal Singh, Tim Miller, Liz Sonenberg, Eduardo Velloso, Frank Vetere,
  Piers Howe, Paul Dourish},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.09516},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2407.09516},
    primaryClass={cs.HC}
}