Post-Hoc Reversal: Are We Selecting Models Prematurely?
<|reference_start|>Post-Hoc Reversal: Are We Selecting Models Prematurely?: Trained models are often composed with post-hoc transforms such as temperature scaling (TS), ensembling and stochastic weight averaging (SWA) to improve performance, robustness, uncertainty estimation, etc. However, such transforms are typically applied only after the base models have already been finalized by standard means. In this paper, we challenge this practice with an extensive empirical study. In particular, we demonstrate a phenomenon that we call post-hoc reversal, where performance trends are reversed after applying post-hoc transforms. This phenomenon is especially prominent in high-noise settings. For example, while base models overfit badly early in training, both ensembling and SWA favor base models trained for more epochs. Post-hoc reversal can also prevent the appearance of double descent and mitigate mismatches between test loss and test error seen in base models. Preliminary analyses suggest that these transforms induce reversal by suppressing the influence of mislabeled examples, exploiting differences in their learning dynamics from those of clean examples. Based on our findings, we propose post-hoc selection, a simple technique whereby post-hoc metrics inform model development decisions such as early stopping, checkpointing, and broader hyperparameter choices. Our experiments span real-world vision, language, tabular and graph datasets. On an LLM instruction tuning dataset, post-hoc selection results in >1.5x MMLU improvement compared to naive selection.<|reference_end|>
@article{ranjan2024post-hoc,
    title={Post-Hoc Reversal: Are We Selecting Models Prematurely?},
    author={Rishabh Ranjan, Saurabh Garg, Mrigank Raman, Carlos Guestrin, Zachary
  Lipton},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07815},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2404.07815},
    primaryClass={cs.LG cs.AI stat.ML}
}