Beyond Scalar Reward Model: Learning Generative Judge from Preference Data
<|reference_start|>Beyond Scalar Reward Model: Learning Generative Judge from Preference Data: Learning from preference feedback is a common practice for aligning large language models~(LLMs) with human value. Conventionally, preference data is learned and encoded into a scalar reward model that connects a value head with an LLM to produce a scalar score as preference or reward. However, scalar models lack interpretability and are known to be susceptible to biases in datasets. This paper investigates leveraging the generation capability of LLMs to address both limitations in one shot. Specifically, we prompt the pre-trained LLM to generate positive and negative judgments, both supported with rationales in natural language form. The self-generated contrastive judgment pairs are used to train the generative judge with Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). This proposal of training the generative Judge using self-generated Contrastive judgments (Con-J) ensures natural interpretability due to the generated rationales together with the judgments, as well as high robustness against bias without the need for an additional reward head. Experimental results show that the performance of Con-J is comparable to the scalar reward model trained on the same collection of preference data, and demonstrate its superior interpretability and robustness in encoding human preferences.<|reference_end|>
@article{ye2024beyond,
    title={Beyond Scalar Reward Model: Learning Generative Judge from Preference
  Data},
    author={Ziyi Ye, Xiangsheng Li, Qiuchi Li, Qingyao Ai, Yujia Zhou, Wei Shen,
  Dong Yan, Yiqun Liu},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.03742},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2410.03742},
    primaryClass={cs.CL cs.AI cs.LG}
}