Metatheory of actions: beyond consistency
<|reference_start|>Metatheory of actions: beyond consistency: Consistency check has been the only criterion for theory evaluation in logic-based approaches to reasoning about actions. This work goes beyond that and contributes to the metatheory of actions by investigating what other properties a good domain description in reasoning about actions should have. We state some metatheoretical postulates concerning this sore spot. When all postulates are satisfied together we have a modular action theory. Besides being easier to understand and more elaboration tolerant in McCarthy's sense, modular theories have interesting properties. We point out the problems that arise when the postulates about modularity are violated and propose algorithmic checks that can help the designer of an action theory to overcome them.<|reference_end|>
@article{herzig2006metatheory,
    title={Metatheory of actions: beyond consistency},
    author={Andreas Herzig and Ivan Varzinczak},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:cs/0603034},
    year={2006},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={cs/0603034},
    primaryClass={cs.AI}
}