Potential-Based Reward Shaping For Intrinsic Motivation
<|reference_start|>Potential-Based Reward Shaping For Intrinsic Motivation: Recently there has been a proliferation of intrinsic motivation (IM) reward-shaping methods to learn in complex and sparse-reward environments. These methods can often inadvertently change the set of optimal policies in an environment, leading to suboptimal behavior. Previous work on mitigating the risks of reward shaping, particularly through potential-based reward shaping (PBRS), has not been applicable to many IM methods, as they are often complex, trainable functions themselves, and therefore dependent on a wider set of variables than the traditional reward functions that PBRS was developed for. We present an extension to PBRS that we prove preserves the set of optimal policies under a more general set of functions than has been previously proven. We also present {\em Potential-Based Intrinsic Motivation} (PBIM), a method for converting IM rewards into a potential-based form that is useable without altering the set of optimal policies. Testing in the MiniGrid DoorKey and Cliff Walking environments, we demonstrate that PBIM successfully prevents the agent from converging to a suboptimal policy and can speed up training.<|reference_end|>
@article{forbes2024potential-based,
    title={Potential-Based Reward Shaping For Intrinsic Motivation},
    author={Grant C. Forbes, Nitish Gupta, Leonardo Villalobos-Arias, Colin M.
  Potts, Arnav Jhala, David L. Roberts},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.07411},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2402.07411},
    primaryClass={cs.LG}
}