Differentiable Optimization of Similarity Scores Between Models and Brains
<|reference_start|>Differentiable Optimization of Similarity Scores Between Models and Brains: What metrics should guide the development of more realistic models of the brain? One proposal is to quantify the similarity between models and brains using methods such as linear regression, Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA), and angular Procrustes distance. To better understand the limitations of these similarity measures we analyze neural activity recorded in five experiments on nonhuman primates, and optimize synthetic datasets to become more similar to these neural recordings. How similar can these synthetic datasets be to neural activity while failing to encode task relevant variables? We find that some measures like linear regression and CKA, differ from angular Procrustes, and yield high similarity scores even when task relevant variables cannot be linearly decoded from the synthetic datasets. Synthetic datasets optimized to maximize similarity scores initially learn the first principal component of the target dataset, but angular Procrustes captures higher variance dimensions much earlier than methods like linear regression and CKA. We show in both theory and simulations how these scores change when different principal components are perturbed. And finally, we jointly optimize multiple similarity scores to find their allowed ranges, and show that a high angular Procrustes similarity, for example, implies a high CKA score, but not the converse.<|reference_end|>
@article{cloos2024differentiable,
    title={Differentiable Optimization of Similarity Scores Between Models and
  Brains},
    author={Nathan Cloos, Moufan Li, Markus Siegel, Scott L. Brincat, Earl K.
  Miller, Guangyu Robert Yang, Christopher J. Cueva},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07059},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2407.07059},
    primaryClass={q-bio.NC cs.LG}
}