Understanding and mitigating difficulties in posterior predictive evaluation
<|reference_start|>Understanding and mitigating difficulties in posterior predictive evaluation: Predictive posterior densities (PPDs) are of interest in approximate Bayesian inference. Typically, these are estimated by simple Monte Carlo (MC) averages using samples from the approximate posterior. We observe that the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of such estimators can be extremely low. An analysis for exact inference reveals SNR decays exponentially as there is an increase in (a) the mismatch between training and test data, (b) the dimensionality of the latent space, or (c) the size of the test data relative to the training data. Further analysis extends these results to approximate inference. To remedy the low SNR problem, we propose replacing simple MC sampling with importance sampling using a proposal distribution optimized at test time on a variational proxy for the SNR and demonstrate that this yields greatly improved estimates.<|reference_end|>
@article{agrawal2024understanding,
    title={Understanding and mitigating difficulties in posterior predictive
  evaluation},
    author={Abhinav Agrawal and Justin Domke},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.19747},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2405.19747},
    primaryClass={cs.LG stat.ML}
}