What Is Being Argued (WIBA)? An Application to Legislative Deliberation in the US Congress
<|reference_start|>What Is Being Argued (WIBA)? An Application to Legislative Deliberation in the US Congress: How can we utilize state-of-the-art NLP tools to better understand legislative deliberation? Committee hearings are a core feature of any legislature, and they offer an institutional setting which promotes the exchange of arguments and reasoning that directly impact and shape legislation. We apply What Is Being Argued (WIBA), which is an argument extraction and analysis framework that we previously developed, to U.S. Congressional committee hearings from 2005 to 2023 (109th to 117th Congresses). Then, we further expand WIBA by introducing new ways to quantify various dynamics of democratic deliberation. Specifically, these extensions present a variety of summary statistics capturing how deliberative or controversial a discourse was, as well as useful visualizations to the WIBA output that aid analyzing arguments made during the legislative deliberation. Our application reveals potential biases in the committee system, and how political parties control the flow of information in 'hot topic' hearings.<|reference_end|>
@article{irani2024what,
    title={What Is Being Argued (WIBA)? An Application to Legislative Deliberation
  in the U.S. Congress},
    author={Arman Irani, Ju Yeon Park, Kevin Esterling, Michalis Faloutsos},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.06149},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2407.06149},
    primaryClass={cs.SI}
}