ADVSCORE: A Metric for the Evaluation and Creation of Adversarial Benchmarks
<|reference_start|>ADVSCORE: A Metric for the Evaluation and Creation of Adversarial Benchmarks: Adversarial benchmarks validate model abilities by providing samples that fool models but not humans. However, despite the proliferation of datasets that claim to be adversarial, there does not exist an established metric to evaluate how adversarial these datasets are. To address this lacuna, we introduce ADVSCORE, a metric which quantifies how adversarial and discriminative an adversarial dataset is and exposes the features that make data adversarial. We then use ADVSCORE to underpin a dataset creation pipeline that incentivizes writing a high-quality adversarial dataset. As a proof of concept, we use ADVSCORE to collect an adversarial question answering (QA) dataset, ADVQA, from our pipeline. The high-quality questions in ADVQA surpasses three adversarial benchmarks across domains at fooling several models but not humans. We validate our result based on difficulty estimates from 9,347 human responses on four datasets and predictions from three models. Moreover, ADVSCORE uncovers which adversarial tactics used by human writers fool models (e.g., GPT-4) but not humans. Through ADVSCORE and its analyses, we offer guidance on revealing language model vulnerabilities and producing reliable adversarial examples.<|reference_end|>
@article{sung2024is,
    title={Is your benchmark truly adversarial? AdvScore: Evaluating Human-Grounded
  Adversarialness},
    author={Yoo Yeon Sung, Maharshi Gor, Eve Fleisig, Ishani Mondal, Jordan Lee
  Boyd-Graber},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.16342},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2406.16342},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}