Accuracy of TextFooler black box adversarial attacks on 01 loss sign activation neural network ensemble
<|reference_start|>Accuracy of TextFooler black box adversarial attacks on 01 loss sign activation neural network ensemble: Recent work has shown the defense of 01 loss sign activation neural networks against image classification adversarial attacks. A public challenge to attack the models on CIFAR10 dataset remains undefeated. We ask the following question in this study: are 01 loss sign activation neural networks hard to deceive with a popular black box text adversarial attack program called TextFooler? We study this question on four popular text classification datasets: IMDB reviews, Yelp reviews, MR sentiment classification, and AG news classification. We find that our 01 loss sign activation network is much harder to attack with TextFooler compared to sigmoid activation cross entropy and binary neural networks. We also study a 01 loss sign activation convolutional neural network with a novel global pooling step specific to sign activation networks. With this new variation we see a significant gain in adversarial accuracy rendering TextFooler practically useless against it. We make our code freely available at \url{https://github.com/zero-one-loss/wordcnn01} and \url{https://github.com/xyzacademic/mlp01example}. Our work here suggests that 01 loss sign activation networks could be further developed to create fool proof models against text adversarial attacks.<|reference_end|>
@article{xue2024accuracy,
    title={Accuracy of TextFooler black box adversarial attacks on 01 loss sign
  activation neural network ensemble},
    author={Yunzhe Xue and Usman Roshan},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.07347},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2402.07347},
    primaryClass={cs.LG cs.AI cs.CR}
}