Can we measure the impact of a database?
<|reference_start|>Can we measure the impact of a database?: In disseminating scientific and statistical data, on-line databases have almost completely replaced traditional paper-based media such as journals and reference works. Given this, can we measure the impact of a database in the same way that we measure an author's or journal's impact? To do this, we need somehow to represent a database as a set of publications, and databases typically allow a large number of possible decompositions into parts, any of which could be treated as a publication.   We show that the definition of the h-index naturally extends to hierarchies, so that if a database admits some kind of hierarchical interpretation we can use this as one measure of the importance of a database; moreover, this can be computed as efficiently as one can compute the normal h-index. This also gives us a decomposition of the database that might be used for other purposes such as giving credit to the curators or contributors to the database. We illustrate the process by analyzing three widely used databases.<|reference_end|>
@article{buneman2024can,
    title={Can we measure the impact of a database?},
    author={Peter Buneman and Dennis Dosso and Matteo Lissandrini and Gianmaria
  Silvello and He Sun},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.09842},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2408.09842},
    primaryClass={cs.DB cs.DL}
}