Generative AI Needs Adaptive Governance
<|reference_start|>Generative AI Needs Adaptive Governance: Because of the speed of its development, broad scope of application, and its ability to augment human performance, generative AI challenges the very notions of governance, trust, and human agency. The technology's capacity to mimic human knowledge work, feedback loops including significant uptick in users, research, investor, policy, and media attention, data and compute resources, all lead to rapidly increasing capabilities. For those reasons, adaptive governance, where AI governance and AI co-evolve, is essential for governing generative AI. In sharp contrast to traditional governance's regulatory regimes that are based on a mix of rigid one-and-done provisions for disclosure, registration and risk management, which in the case of AI carry the potential for regulatory misalignment, this paper argues that generative AI calls for adaptive governance. We define adaptive governance in the context of AI and outline an adaptive AI governance framework. We outline actors, roles, as well as both shared and actors-specific policy activities. We further provide examples of how the framework could be operationalized in practice. We then explain that the adaptive AI governance stance is not without its risks and limitations, such as insufficient oversight, insufficient depth, regulatory uncertainty, and regulatory capture, and provide potential approaches to fix these shortcomings.<|reference_end|>
@article{reuel2024generative,
    title={Generative AI Needs Adaptive Governance},
    author={Anka Reuel and Trond Arne Undheim},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.04554},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2406.04554},
    primaryClass={cs.CY}
}