Is a model equivalent to its computer implementation?
<|reference_start|>Is a model equivalent to its computer implementation?: A recent trend in mathematical modeling is to publish the computer code together with the research findings. Here we explore the formal question, whether and in which sense a computer implementation is distinct from the mathematical model. We argue that, despite the convenience of implemented models, a set of implicit assumptions is perpetuated with the implementation to the extent that even in widely used models the causal link between the (formal) mathematical model and the set of results is no longer certain. Moreover, code publication is often seen as an important contributor to reproducible research, we suggest that in some cases the opposite may be true. A new perspective on this topic stems from the accelerating trend that in some branches of research only implemented models are used, e.g., in artificial intelligence (AI). With the advent of quantum computers we argue that completely novel challenges arise in the distinction between models and implementations.<|reference_end|>
@article{hiesmayr2024is,
    title={Is a model equivalent to its computer implementation?},
    author={Beatrix C. Hiesmayr and Marc-Thorsten H"utt},
    journal={Proceedings of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts, 3.
  (2024)},
    year={2024},
    doi={10.4081/peasa.26},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2402.15364},
    primaryClass={cs.CY quant-ph}
}