Your Weak LLM is Secretly a Strong Teacher for Alignment
<|reference_start|>Your Weak LLM is Secretly a Strong Teacher for Alignment: The burgeoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have underscored the need for alignment to ensure these models act in accordance with human values and intentions. Existing alignment frameworks present constraints either in the form of expensive human effort or high computational costs. This paper explores a promising middle ground, where we employ a weak LLM that is significantly less resource-intensive than top-tier models, yet offers more automation than purely human feedback. We present a systematic study to evaluate and understand weak LLM's ability to generate feedback for alignment. Our empirical findings demonstrate that weak LLMs can provide feedback that rivals or even exceeds that of fully human-annotated data. Our study indicates a minimized impact of model size on feedback efficacy, shedding light on a scalable and sustainable alignment strategy. To deepen our understanding of alignment under weak LLM feedback, we conduct a series of qualitative and quantitative analyses, offering novel insights into the quality discrepancies between human feedback vs. weak LLM feedback.<|reference_end|>
@article{tao2024your,
    title={Your Weak LLM is Secretly a Strong Teacher for Alignment},
    author={Leitian Tao, Yixuan Li},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.08813},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2409.08813},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}