Comparative Study of Quantum Transpilers: Evaluating the Performance of qiskit-braket-provider, qBraid-SDK, and Pytket Extensions
<|reference_start|>Comparative Study of Quantum Transpilers: Evaluating the Performance of qiskit-braket-provider, qBraid-SDK, and Pytket Extensions: In this study, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of several quantum transpilers, including the qiskit-braket-provider, the qBraid-SDK, and the pytket extensions, focusing on critical metrics such as correctness, failure rate, and transpilation time. Our results demonstrate that the qiskit-braket-provider exhibits superior performance achieving a remarkably low failure rate of 0.2%. the qiskit-braket-provider utilizes a combination of one-to-one transpilation and gate decomposition for unsupported gates, enhancing transpiler capabilities and speed. The qBraid-SDK offers a more generalized approach, suitable for transpilation across multiple SDKs, albeit with slower performance compared to the qiskit-braket-provider. The pytket extensions, while fast, exhibit limitations in handling complex circuits due to their one-to-one transpilation scheme. We also provide recommendations for future development, advocating for the adoption of the method employed by the qiskit-braket-provider to enhance transpiler capabilities and speed. This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge in quantum transpiler benchmarking, fostering interoperability and guiding the development of quantum computing applications in a diverse hardware and software landscape.<|reference_end|>
@article{louamri2024comparative,
    title={Comparative Study of Quantum Transpilers: Evaluating the Performance of
  qiskit-braket-provider, qBraid-SDK, and Pytket Extensions},
    author={Mohamed Messaoud Louamri, Nacer eddine Belaloui, Abdellah Tounsi,
  Mohamed Taha Rouabah},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06836},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2406.06836},
    primaryClass={quant-ph cs.ET}
}