Plausibility Measures and Default Reasoning
<|reference_start|>Plausibility Measures and Default Reasoning: We introduce a new approach to modeling uncertainty based on plausibility measures. This approach is easily seen to generalize other approaches to modeling uncertainty, such as probability measures, belief functions, and possibility measures. We focus on one application of plausibility measures in this paper: default reasoning. In recent years, a number of different semantics for defaults have been proposed, such as preferential structures, $\epsilon$-semantics, possibilistic structures, and $\kappa$-rankings, that have been shown to be characterized by the same set of axioms, known as the KLM properties. While this was viewed as a surprise, we show here that it is almost inevitable. In the framework of plausibility measures, we can give a necessary condition for the KLM axioms to be sound, and an additional condition necessary and sufficient to ensure that the KLM axioms are complete. This additional condition is so weak that it is almost always met whenever the axioms are sound. In particular, it is easily seen to hold for all the proposals made in the literature.<|reference_end|>
@article{friedman1998plausibility,
    title={Plausibility Measures and Default Reasoning},
    author={Nir Friedman and Joseph Y. Halpern},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:cs/9808007},
    year={1998},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={cs/9808007},
    primaryClass={cs.AI cs.LO}
}