Context as a Spurious Concept
<|reference_start|>Context as a Spurious Concept: I take issue with AI formalizations of context, primarily the formalization by McCarthy and Buvac, that regard context as an undefined primitive whose formalization can be the same in many different kinds of AI tasks. In particular, any theory of context in natural language must take the special nature of natural language into account and cannot regard context simply as an undefined primitive. I show that there is no such thing as a coherent theory of context simpliciter -- context pure and simple -- and that context in natural language is not the same kind of thing as context in KR. In natural language, context is constructed by the speaker and the interpreter, and both have considerable discretion in so doing. Therefore, a formalization based on pre-defined contexts and pre-defined `lifting axioms' cannot account for how context is used in real-world language.<|reference_end|>
@article{hirst1997context,
    title={Context as a Spurious Concept},
    author={Graeme Hirst (University of Toronto)},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:cmp-lg/9712003},
    year={1997},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={cmp-lg/9712003},
    primaryClass={cmp-lg cs.CL}
}