On the Computational Complexity of Defining Sets
<|reference_start|>On the Computational Complexity of Defining Sets: Suppose we have a family ${\cal F}$ of sets. For every $S \in {\cal F}$, a set $D \subseteq S$ is a {\sf defining set} for $({\cal F},S)$ if $S$ is the only element of $\cal{F}$ that contains $D$ as a subset. This concept has been studied in numerous cases, such as vertex colorings, perfect matchings, dominating sets, block designs, geodetics, orientations, and Latin squares.   In this paper, first, we propose the concept of a defining set of a logical formula, and we prove that the computational complexity of such a problem is $\Sigma_2$-complete.   We also show that the computational complexity of the following problem about the defining set of vertex colorings of graphs is $\Sigma_2$-complete:   {\sc Instance:} A graph $G$ with a vertex coloring $c$ and an integer $k$.   {\sc Question:} If ${\cal C}(G)$ be the set of all $\chi(G)$-colorings of $G$, then does $({\cal C}(G),c)$ have a defining set of size at most $k$?   Moreover, we study the computational complexity of some other variants of this problem.<|reference_end|>
@article{hatami2006on,
    title={On the Computational Complexity of Defining Sets},
    author={Hamed Hatami and Hossein Maserrat},
    journal={Journal of Discrete Applied Mathematics .149(1-3) (2005) pp.
  101-110},
    year={2006},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={cs/0701008},
    primaryClass={cs.CC}
}