Not All Contexts Are Equal: Teaching LLMs Credibility-aware Generation
<|reference_start|>Not All Contexts Are Equal: Teaching LLMs Credibility-aware Generation: The rapid development of large language models has led to the widespread adoption of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), which integrates external knowledge to alleviate knowledge bottlenecks and mitigate hallucinations. However, the existing RAG paradigm inevitably suffers from the impact of flawed information introduced during the retrieval phrase, thereby diminishing the reliability and correctness of the generated outcomes. In this paper, we propose Credibility-aware Generation (CAG), a universally applicable framework designed to mitigate the impact of flawed information in RAG. At its core, CAG aims to equip models with the ability to discern and process information based on its credibility. To this end, we propose an innovative data transformation framework that generates data based on credibility, thereby effectively endowing models with the capability of CAG. Furthermore, to accurately evaluate the models' capabilities of CAG, we construct a comprehensive benchmark covering three critical real-world scenarios. Experimental results demonstrate that our model can effectively understand and utilize credibility for generation, significantly outperform other models with retrieval augmentation, and exhibit resilience against the disruption caused by noisy documents, thereby maintaining robust performance. Moreover, our model supports customized credibility, offering a wide range of potential applications.<|reference_end|>
@article{pan2024not,
    title={Not All Contexts Are Equal: Teaching LLMs Credibility-aware Generation},
    author={Ruotong Pan, Boxi Cao, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, Jia Zheng, Sirui Wang,
  Xunliang Cai, Le Sun},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.06809},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2404.06809},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}