Beyond Self-Consistency: Ensemble Reasoning Boosts Consistency and Accuracy of LLMs in Cancer Staging
<|reference_start|>Beyond Self-Consistency: Ensemble Reasoning Boosts Consistency and Accuracy of LLMs in Cancer Staging: Advances in large language models (LLMs) have encouraged their adoption in the healthcare domain where vital clinical information is often contained in unstructured notes. Cancer staging status is available in clinical reports, but it requires natural language processing to extract the status from the unstructured text. With the advance in clinical-oriented LLMs, it is promising to extract such status without extensive efforts in training the algorithms. Prompting approaches of the pre-trained LLMs that elicit a model's reasoning process, such as chain-of-thought, may help to improve the trustworthiness of the generated responses. Using self-consistency further improves model performance, but often results in inconsistent generations across the multiple reasoning paths. In this study, we propose an ensemble reasoning approach with the aim of improving the consistency of the model generations. Using an open access clinical large language model to determine the pathologic cancer stage from real-world pathology reports, we show that the ensemble reasoning approach is able to improve both the consistency and performance of the LLM in determining cancer stage, thereby demonstrating the potential to use these models in clinical or other domains where reliability and trustworthiness are critical.<|reference_end|>
@article{chang2024beyond,
    title={Beyond Self-Consistency: Ensemble Reasoning Boosts Consistency and
  Accuracy of LLMs in Cancer Staging},
    author={Chia-Hsuan Chang, Mary M. Lucas, Yeawon Lee, Christopher C. Yang,
  Grace Lu-Yao},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.13149},
    year={2024},
    doi={10.1007/978-3-031-66538-7_23},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2404.13149},
    primaryClass={cs.CL cs.AI}
}