Analyzing the Influence of Training Samples on Explanations
<|reference_start|>Analyzing the Influence of Training Samples on Explanations: EXplainable AI (XAI) constitutes a popular method to analyze the reasoning of AI systems by explaining their decision-making, e.g. providing a counterfactual explanation of how to achieve recourse. However, in cases such as unexpected explanations, the user might be interested in learning about the cause of this explanation -- e.g. properties of the utilized training data that are responsible for the observed explanation. Under the umbrella of data valuation, first approaches have been proposed that estimate the influence of data samples on a given model. In this work, we take a slightly different stance, as we are interested in the influence of single samples on a model explanation rather than the model itself. Hence, we propose the novel problem of identifying training data samples that have a high influence on a given explanation (or related quantity) and investigate the particular case of differences in the cost of the recourse between protected groups. For this, we propose an algorithm that identifies such influential training samples.<|reference_end|>
@article{artelt2024analyzing,
    title={Analyzing the Influence of Training Samples on Explanations},
    author={Andr'e Artelt and Barbara Hammer},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.03012},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2406.03012},
    primaryClass={cs.LG cs.AI}
}