Stereotype or Personalization? User Identity Biases Chatbot Recommendations
<|reference_start|>Stereotype or Personalization? User Identity Biases Chatbot Recommendations: We demonstrate that when people use large language models (LLMs) to generate recommendations, the LLMs produce responses that reflect both what the user wants and who the user is. While personalized recommendations are often desired by users, it can be difficult in practice to distinguish cases of bias from cases of personalization: we find that models generate racially stereotypical recommendations regardless of whether the user revealed their identity intentionally through explicit indications or unintentionally through implicit cues. We argue that chatbots ought to transparently indicate when recommendations are influenced by a user's revealed identity characteristics, but observe that they currently fail to do so. Our experiments show that even though a user's revealed identity significantly influences model recommendations (p < 0.001), model responses obfuscate this fact in response to user queries. This bias and lack of transparency occurs consistently across multiple popular consumer LLMs (gpt-4o-mini, gpt-4-turbo, llama-3-70B, and claude-3.5) and for four American racial groups.<|reference_end|>
@article{kantharuban2024stereotype,
    title={Stereotype or Personalization? User Identity Biases Chatbot
  Recommendations},
    author={Anjali Kantharuban, Jeremiah Milbauer, Emma Strubell, and Graham
  Neubig},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.05613},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2410.05613},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}