Example-Based Optimization of Surface-Generation Tables
<|reference_start|>Example-Based Optimization of Surface-Generation Tables: A method is given that "inverts" a logic grammar and displays it from the point of view of the logical form, rather than from that of the word string. LR-compiling techniques are used to allow a recursive-descent generation algorithm to perform "functor merging" much in the same way as an LR parser performs prefix merging. This is an improvement on the semantic-head-driven generator that results in a much smaller search space. The amount of semantic lookahead can be varied, and appropriate tradeoff points between table size and resulting nondeterminism can be found automatically. This can be done by removing all spurious nondeterminism for input sufficiently close to the examples of a training corpus, and large portions of it for other input, while preserving completeness.<|reference_end|>
@article{samuelsson1996example-based,
    title={Example-Based Optimization of Surface-Generation Tables},
    author={Christer Samuelsson (University of the Saarland)},
    journal={R. Mitkov and N. Nicolov (eds.) "Recent Advances in Natural
  Language Processing", vol. 136 of "Current Issues in Linguistic Theory", John
  Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1996.},
    year={1996},
    number={CLAUS 56},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={cmp-lg/9605035},
    primaryClass={cmp-lg cs.CL}
}