Exploring Generative AI Policies in Higher Education: A Comparative Perspective from China, Japan, Mongolia, and the USA
<|reference_start|>Exploring Generative AI Policies in Higher Education: A Comparative Perspective from China, Japan, Mongolia, and the USA: This study conducts a comparative analysis of national policies on Generative AI across four countries: China, Japan, Mongolia, and the USA. Employing the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) method, it examines the responses of these nations to Generative AI in higher education settings, scrutinizing the diversity in their approaches within this group. While all four countries exhibit a positive attitude toward Generative AI in higher education, Japan and the USA prioritize a human-centered approach and provide direct guidance in teaching and learning. In contrast, China and Mongolia prioritize national security concerns, with their guidelines focusing more on the societal level rather than being specifically tailored to education. Additionally, despite all four countries emphasizing diversity, equity, and inclusion, they consistently fail to clearly discuss or implement measures to address the digital divide. By offering a comprehensive comparative analysis of attitudes and policies regarding Generative AI in higher education across these countries, this study enriches existing literature and provides policymakers with a global perspective, ensuring that policies in this domain promote inclusion rather than exclusion.<|reference_end|>
@article{xie2024exploring,
    title={Exploring Generative AI Policies in Higher Education: A Comparative
  Perspective from China, Japan, Mongolia, and the USA},
    author={Qin Xie, Ming Li, Ariunaa Enkhtur},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.08986},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2407.08986},
    primaryClass={cs.CY}
}