Self-Supervised Speech Representations are More Phonetic than Semantic
<|reference_start|>Self-Supervised Speech Representations are More Phonetic than Semantic: Self-supervised speech models (S3Ms) have become an effective backbone for speech applications. Various analyses suggest that S3Ms encode linguistic properties. In this work, we seek a more fine-grained analysis of the word-level linguistic properties encoded in S3Ms. Specifically, we curate a novel dataset of near homophone (phonetically similar) and synonym (semantically similar) word pairs and measure the similarities between S3M word representation pairs. Our study reveals that S3M representations consistently and significantly exhibit more phonetic than semantic similarity. Further, we question whether widely used intent classification datasets such as Fluent Speech Commands and Snips Smartlights are adequate for measuring semantic abilities. Our simple baseline, using only the word identity, surpasses S3M-based models. This corroborates our findings and suggests that high scores on these datasets do not necessarily guarantee the presence of semantic content.<|reference_end|>
@article{choi2024self-supervised,
    title={Self-Supervised Speech Representations are More Phonetic than Semantic},
    author={Kwanghee Choi, Ankita Pasad, Tomohiko Nakamura, Satoru Fukayama, Karen
  Livescu, Shinji Watanabe},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08619},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2406.08619},
    primaryClass={cs.CL cs.LG eess.AS}
}