Rethinking the Influence of Source Code on Test Case Generation
<|reference_start|>Rethinking the Influence of Source Code on Test Case Generation: Large language models (LLMs) have been widely applied to assist test generation with the source code under test provided as the context. This paper aims to answer the question: If the source code under test is incorrect, will LLMs be misguided when generating tests? The effectiveness of test cases is measured by their accuracy, coverage, and bug detection effectiveness. Our evaluation results with five open- and six closed-source LLMs on four datasets demonstrate that incorrect code can significantly mislead LLMs in generating correct, high-coverage, and bug-revealing tests. For instance, in the HumanEval dataset, LLMs achieve 80.45% test accuracy when provided with task descriptions and correct code, but only 57.12% when given task descriptions and incorrect code. For the APPS dataset, prompts with correct code yield tests that detect 39.85% of the bugs, while prompts with incorrect code detect only 19.61%. These findings have important implications for the deployment of LLM-based testing: using it on mature code may help protect against future regression, but on early-stage immature code, it may simply bake in errors. Our findings also underscore the need for further research to improve LLMs resilience against incorrect code in generating reliable and bug-revealing tests.<|reference_end|>
@article{huang2024rethinking,
    title={Rethinking the Influence of Source Code on Test Case Generation},
    author={Dong Huang, Jie M. Zhang, Mingzhe Du, Mark Harman, Heming Cui},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.09464},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2409.09464},
    primaryClass={cs.SE cs.CL}
}