Can Model Uncertainty Function as a Proxy for Multiple-Choice Question Item Difficulty?
<|reference_start|>Can Model Uncertainty Function as a Proxy for Multiple-Choice Question Item Difficulty?: Estimating the difficulty of multiple-choice questions would be great help for educators who must spend substantial time creating and piloting stimuli for their tests, and for learners who want to practice. Supervised approaches to difficulty estimation have yielded to date mixed results. In this contribution we leverage an aspect of generative large models which might be seen as a weakness when answering questions, namely their uncertainty, and exploit it towards exploring correlations between two different metrics of uncertainty, and the actual student response distribution. While we observe some present but weak correlations, we also discover that the models' behaviour is different in the case of correct vs wrong answers, and that correlations differ substantially according to the different question types which are included in our fine-grained, previously unused dataset of 451 questions from a Biopsychology course. In discussing our findings, we also suggest potential avenues to further leverage model uncertainty as an additional proxy for item difficulty.<|reference_end|>
@article{zotos2024can,
    title={Can Model Uncertainty Function as a Proxy for Multiple-Choice Question
  Item Difficulty?},
    author={Leonidas Zotos, Hedderik van Rijn and Malvina Nissim},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.05327},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2407.05327},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}