Revisiting Multi-Modal LLM Evaluation
<|reference_start|>Revisiting Multi-Modal LLM Evaluation: With the advent of multi-modal large language models (MLLMs), datasets used for visual question answering (VQA) and referring expression comprehension have seen a resurgence. However, the most popular datasets used to evaluate MLLMs are some of the earliest ones created, and they have many known problems, including extreme bias, spurious correlations, and an inability to permit fine-grained analysis. In this paper, we pioneer evaluating recent MLLMs (LLaVA 1.5, LLaVA-NeXT, BLIP2, InstructBLIP, GPT-4V, and GPT-4o) on datasets designed to address weaknesses in earlier ones. We assess three VQA datasets: 1) TDIUC, which permits fine-grained analysis on 12 question types; 2) TallyQA, which has simple and complex counting questions; and 3) DVQA, which requires optical character recognition for chart understanding. We also study VQDv1, a dataset that requires identifying all image regions that satisfy a given query. Our experiments reveal the weaknesses of many MLLMs that have not previously been reported. Our code is integrated into the widely used LAVIS framework for MLLM evaluation, enabling the rapid assessment of future MLLMs. Project webpage: https://kevinlujian.github.io/MLLM_Evaluations/<|reference_end|>
@article{lu2024revisiting,
    title={Revisiting Multi-Modal LLM Evaluation},
    author={Jian Lu, Shikhar Srivastava, Junyu Chen, Robik Shrestha, Manoj
  Acharya, Kushal Kafle, Christopher Kanan},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.05334},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2408.05334},
    primaryClass={cs.AI cs.CL cs.CV}
}