Language in Vivo vs in Silico: Size Matters but Larger Language Models Still Do Not Comprehend Language on a Par with Humans
<|reference_start|>Language in Vivo vs in Silico: Size Matters but Larger Language Models Still Do Not Comprehend Language on a Par with Humans: Understanding the limits of language is a prerequisite for Large Language Models (LLMs) to act as theories of natural language. LLM performance in some language tasks presents both quantitative and qualitative differences from that of humans, however it remains to be determined whether such differences are amenable to model size. This work investigates the critical role of model scaling, determining whether increases in size make up for such differences between humans and models. We test three LLMs from different families (Bard, 137 billion parameters; ChatGPT-3.5, 175 billion; ChatGPT-4, 1.5 trillion) on a grammaticality judgment task featuring anaphora, center embedding, comparatives, and negative polarity. N=1,200 judgments are collected and scored for accuracy, stability, and improvements in accuracy upon repeated presentation of a prompt. Results of the best performing LLM, ChatGPT-4, are compared to results of n=80 humans on the same stimuli. We find that humans are overall less accurate than ChatGPT-4 (76% vs. 80% accuracy, respectively), but that this is due to ChatGPT-4 outperforming humans only in one task condition, namely on grammatical sentences. Additionally, ChatGPT-4 wavers more than humans in its answers (12.5% vs. 9.6% likelihood of an oscillating answer, respectively). Thus, while increased model size may lead to better performance, LLMs are still not sensitive to (un)grammaticality the same way as humans are. It seems possible but unlikely that scaling alone can fix this issue. We interpret these results by comparing language learning in vivo and in silico, identifying three critical differences concerning (i) the type of evidence, (ii) the poverty of the stimulus, and (iii) the occurrence of semantic hallucinations due to impenetrable linguistic reference.<|reference_end|>
@article{dentella2024language,
    title={Language in Vivo vs. in Silico: Size Matters but Larger Language Models
  Still Do Not Comprehend Language on a Par with Humans},
    author={Vittoria Dentella, Fritz Guenther, Evelina Leivada},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.14883},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2404.14883},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}