Can LLMs substitute SQL? Comparing Resource Utilization of Querying LLMs versus Traditional Relational Databases
<|reference_start|>Can LLMs substitute SQL? Comparing Resource Utilization of Querying LLMs versus Traditional Relational Databases: Large Language Models (LLMs) can automate or substitute different types of tasks in the software engineering process. This study evaluates the resource utilization and accuracy of LLM in interpreting and executing natural language queries against traditional SQL within relational database management systems. We empirically examine the resource utilization and accuracy of nine LLMs varying from 7 to 34 Billion parameters, including Llama2 7B, Llama2 13B, Mistral, Mixtral, Optimus-7B, SUS-chat-34B, platypus-yi-34b, NeuralHermes-2.5-Mistral-7B and Starling-LM-7B-alpha, using a small transaction dataset. Our findings indicate that using LLMs for database queries incurs significant energy overhead (even small and quantized models), making it an environmentally unfriendly approach. Therefore, we advise against replacing relational databases with LLMs due to their substantial resource utilization.<|reference_end|>
@article{zhang2024can,
    title={Can LLMs substitute SQL? Comparing Resource Utilization of Querying LLMs
  versus Traditional Relational Databases},
    author={Xiang Zhang, Khatoon Khedri, Reza Rawassizadeh},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.08727},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2404.08727},
    primaryClass={cs.DB cs.AI cs.CL}
}