Can Large Language Models Assess Serendipity in Recommender Systems?
<|reference_start|>Can Large Language Models Assess Serendipity in Recommender Systems?: Serendipity-oriented recommender systems aim to counteract over-specialization in user preferences. However, evaluating a user's serendipitous response towards a recommended item can be challenging because of its emotional nature. In this study, we address this issue by leveraging the rich knowledge of large language models (LLMs), which can perform a variety of tasks. First, this study explored the alignment between serendipitous evaluations made by LLMs and those made by humans. In this investigation, a binary classification task was given to the LLMs to predict whether a user would find the recommended item serendipitously. The predictive performances of three LLMs on a benchmark dataset in which humans assigned the ground truth of serendipitous items were measured. The experimental findings reveal that LLM-based assessment methods did not have a very high agreement rate with human assessments. However, they performed as well as or better than the baseline methods. Further validation results indicate that the number of user rating histories provided to LLM prompts should be carefully chosen to avoid both insufficient and excessive inputs and that the output of LLMs that show high classification performance is difficult to interpret.<|reference_end|>
@article{tokutake2024can,
    title={Can Large Language Models Assess Serendipity in Recommender Systems?},
    author={Yu Tokutake and Kazushi Okamoto},
    journal={The paper is under consideration at Journal of Advanced
  Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, Fuji Technology
  Press, 2024},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2404.07499},
    primaryClass={cs.IR}
}