Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
<|reference_start|>Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to perform better when asked to reason step-by-step before answering a question. However, it is unclear to what degree the model's final answer is faithful to the stated reasoning steps. In this paper, we perform a causal mediation analysis on twelve LLMs to examine how intermediate reasoning steps generated by the LLM influence the final outcome and find that LLMs do not reliably use their intermediate reasoning steps when generating an answer. To address this issue, we introduce FRODO, a framework to tailor small-sized LMs to generate correct reasoning steps and robustly reason over these steps. FRODO consists of an inference module that learns to generate correct reasoning steps using an implicit causal reward function and a reasoning module that learns to faithfully reason over these intermediate inferences using a counterfactual and causal preference objective. Our experiments show that FRODO significantly outperforms four competitive baselines. Furthermore, FRODO improves the robustness and generalization ability of the reasoning LM, yielding higher performance on out-of-distribution test sets. Finally, we find that FRODO's rationales are more faithful to its final answer predictions than standard supervised fine-tuning.<|reference_end|>
@article{paul2024making,
    title={Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of
  Chain-of-Thought Reasoning},
    author={Debjit Paul, Robert West, Antoine Bosselut and Boi Faltings},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13950},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2402.13950},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}