Debiasing Machine Unlearning with Counterfactual Examples
<|reference_start|>Debiasing Machine Unlearning with Counterfactual Examples: The right to be forgotten (RTBF) seeks to safeguard individuals from the enduring effects of their historical actions by implementing machine-learning techniques. These techniques facilitate the deletion of previously acquired knowledge without requiring extensive model retraining. However, they often overlook a critical issue: unlearning processes bias. This bias emerges from two main sources: (1) data-level bias, characterized by uneven data removal, and (2) algorithm-level bias, which leads to the contamination of the remaining dataset, thereby degrading model accuracy. In this work, we analyze the causal factors behind the unlearning process and mitigate biases at both data and algorithmic levels. Typically, we introduce an intervention-based approach, where knowledge to forget is erased with a debiased dataset. Besides, we guide the forgetting procedure by leveraging counterfactual examples, as they maintain semantic data consistency without hurting performance on the remaining dataset. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms existing machine unlearning baselines on evaluation metrics.<|reference_end|>
@article{chen2024debiasing,
    title={Debiasing Machine Unlearning with Counterfactual Examples},
    author={Ziheng Chen, Jia Wang, Jun Zhuang, Abbavaram Gowtham Reddy, Fabrizio
  Silvestri, Jin Huang, Kaushiki Nag, Kun Kuang, Xin Ning, Gabriele Tolomei},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15760},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2404.15760},
    primaryClass={cs.LG cs.AI stat.ML}
}