Studying Practitioners' Expectations on Clear Code Review Comments
<|reference_start|>Studying Practitioners' Expectations on Clear Code Review Comments: The code review comment (CRC) is pivotal in the process of modern code review. It provides reviewers with the opportunity to identify potential bugs, offer constructive feedback, and suggest improvements. Clear and concise code review comments (CRCs) facilitate the communication between developers and is crucial to the correct understanding of the issues identified and proposed solutions. Despite the importance of CRCs' clarity, there is still a lack of guidelines on what constitutes a good clarity and how to evaluate it. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive study on understanding and evaluating the clarity of CRCs. We first derive a set of attributes related to the clarity of CRCs, namely RIE attributes (i.e., Relevance, Informativeness, and Expression), as well as their corresponding evaluation criteria based on our literature review and survey with practitioners. We then investigate the clarity of CRCs in open-source projects written in nine programming languages and find that a large portion (i.e., 28.8%) of the CRCs lack the clarity in at least one of the attributes. Finally, we propose ClearCRC, an automated framework that evaluates the clarity of CRCs. Experimental results show that ClearCRC can effectively evaluate the clarity of CRCs and outperform the baselines.<|reference_end|>
@article{li2024studying,
    title={Studying Practitioners' Expectations on Clear Code Review Comments},
    author={Zhenhao Li, Junkai Chen, Qiheng Mao, Xing Hu, Kui Liu, Xin Xia},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06515},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2410.06515},
    primaryClass={cs.SE}
}