Wrong-of-Thought: An Integrated Reasoning Framework with Multi-Perspective Verification and Wrong Information
<|reference_start|>Wrong-of-Thought: An Integrated Reasoning Framework with Multi-Perspective Verification and Wrong Information: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has become a vital technique for enhancing the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs), attracting increasing attention from researchers. One stream of approaches focuses on the iterative enhancement of LLMs by continuously verifying and refining their reasoning outputs for desired quality. Despite its impressive results, this paradigm faces two critical issues: (1) Simple verification methods: The current paradigm relies solely on a single verification method. (2) Wrong Information Ignorance: Traditional paradigms directly ignore wrong information during reasoning and refine the logic paths from scratch each time. To address these challenges, we propose Wrong-of-Thought (WoT), which includes two core modules: (1) Multi-Perspective Verification: A multi-perspective verification method for accurately refining the reasoning process and result, and (2) Wrong Information Utilization: Utilizing wrong information to alert LLMs and reduce the probability of LLMs making same mistakes. Experiments on 8 popular datasets and 5 LLMs demonstrate that WoT surpasses all previous baselines. In addition, WoT exhibits powerful capabilities in difficult computation tasks.<|reference_end|>
@article{zhang2024wrong-of-thought:,
    title={Wrong-of-Thought: An Integrated Reasoning Framework with
  Multi-Perspective Verification and Wrong Information},
    author={Yongheng Zhang, Qiguang Chen, Jingxuan Zhou, Peng Wang, Jiasheng Si,
  Jin Wang, Wenpeng Lu, Libo Qin},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.04463},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2410.04463},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}