Does Baum-Welch Re-estimation Help Taggers?
<|reference_start|>Does Baum-Welch Re-estimation Help Taggers?: In part of speech tagging by Hidden Markov Model, a statistical model is used to assign grammatical categories to words in a text. Early work in the field relied on a corpus which had been tagged by a human annotator to train the model. More recently, Cutting {\it et al.} (1992) suggest that training can be achieved with a minimal lexicon and a limited amount of {\em a priori} information about probabilities, by using Baum-Welch re-estimation to automatically refine the model. In this paper, I report two experiments designed to determine how much manual training information is needed. The first experiment suggests that initial biasing of either lexical or transition probabilities is essential to achieve a good accuracy. The second experiment reveals that there are three distinct patterns of Baum-Welch re-estimation. In two of the patterns, the re-estimation ultimately reduces the accuracy of the tagging rather than improving it. The pattern which is applicable can be predicted from the quality of the initial model and the similarity between the tagged training corpus (if any) and the corpus to be tagged. Heuristics for deciding how to use re-estimation in an effective manner are given. The conclusions are broadly in agreement with those of Merialdo (1994), but give greater detail about the contributions of different parts of the model.<|reference_end|>
@article{elworthy1994does,
    title={Does Baum-Welch Re-estimation Help Taggers?},
    author={David Elworthy (Sharp Laboratories of Europe Ltd)},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:cmp-lg/9410012},
    year={1994},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={cmp-lg/9410012},
    primaryClass={cmp-lg cs.CL}
}