Measuring and Controlling Instruction (In)Stability in Language Model Dialogs
<|reference_start|>Measuring and Controlling Instruction (In)Stability in Language Model Dialogs: System-prompting is a standard tool for customizing language-model chatbots, enabling them to follow a specific instruction. An implicit assumption in the use of system prompts is that they will be stable, so the chatbot will continue to generate text according to the stipulated instructions for the duration of a conversation. We propose a quantitative benchmark to test this assumption, evaluating instruction stability via self-chats between two instructed chatbots. Testing popular models like LLaMA2-chat-70B and GPT-3.5, we reveal a significant instruction drift within eight rounds of conversations. An empirical and theoretical analysis of this phenomenon suggests the transformer attention mechanism plays a role, due to attention decay over long exchanges. To combat attention decay and instruction drift, we propose a lightweight method called split-softmax, which compares favorably against two strong baselines.<|reference_end|>
@article{li2024measuring,
    title={Measuring and Controlling Instruction (In)Stability in Language Model
  Dialogs},
    author={Kenneth Li, Tianle Liu, Naomi Bashkansky, David Bau, Fernanda
  Vi'egas, Hanspeter Pfister, Martin Wattenberg},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10962},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2402.10962},
    primaryClass={cs.CL cs.AI cs.LG}
}