Effects of AI Feedback on Learning, the Skill Gap, and Intellectual Diversity
<|reference_start|>Effects of AI Feedback on Learning, the Skill Gap, and Intellectual Diversity: Can human decision-makers learn from AI feedback? Using data on 52,000 decision-makers from a large online chess platform, we investigate how their AI use affects three interrelated long-term outcomes: Learning, skill gap, and diversity of decision strategies. First, we show that individuals are far more likely to seek AI feedback in situations in which they experienced success rather than failure. This AI feedback seeking strategy turns out to be detrimental to learning: Feedback on successes decreases future performance, while feedback on failures increases it. Second, higher-skilled decision-makers seek AI feedback more often and are far more likely to seek AI feedback after a failure, and benefit more from AI feedback than lower-skilled individuals. As a result, access to AI feedback increases, rather than decreases, the skill gap between high- and low-skilled individuals. Finally, we leverage 42 major platform updates as natural experiments to show that access to AI feedback causes a decrease in intellectual diversity of the population as individuals tend to specialize in the same areas. Together, those results indicate that learning from AI feedback is not automatic and using AI correctly seems to be a skill itself. Furthermore, despite its individual-level benefits, access to AI feedback can have significant population-level downsides including loss of intellectual diversity and an increasing skill gap.<|reference_end|>
@article{riedl2024effects,
    title={Effects of AI Feedback on Learning, the Skill Gap, and Intellectual
  Diversity},
    author={Christoph Riedl and Eric Bogert},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.18660},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2409.18660},
    primaryClass={econ.GN cs.AI cs.HC q-fin.EC}
}