Exploring the Nexus Between Retrievability and Query Generation Strategies
<|reference_start|>Exploring the Nexus Between Retrievability and Query Generation Strategies: Quantifying bias in retrieval functions through document retrievability scores is vital for assessing recall-oriented retrieval systems. However, many studies investigating retrieval model bias lack validation of their query generation methods as accurate representations of retrievability for real users and their queries. This limitation results from the absence of established criteria for query generation in retrievability assessments. Typically, researchers resort to using frequent collocations from document corpora when no query log is available. In this study, we address the issue of reproducibility and seek to validate query generation methods by comparing retrievability scores generated from artificially generated queries to those derived from query logs. Our findings demonstrate a minimal or negligible correlation between retrievability scores from artificial queries and those from query logs. This suggests that artificially generated queries may not accurately reflect retrievability scores as derived from query logs. We further explore alternative query generation techniques, uncovering a variation that exhibits the highest correlation. This alternative approach holds promise for improving reproducibility when query logs are unavailable.<|reference_end|>
@article{sinha2024exploring,
    title={Exploring the Nexus Between Retrievability and Query Generation
  Strategies},
    author={Aman Sinha, Priyanshu Raj Mall, and Dwaipayan Roy},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.09473},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2404.09473},
    primaryClass={cs.IR}
}