Can We Delegate Learning to Automation?: A Comparative Study of LLM Chatbots, Search Engines, and Books
<|reference_start|>Can We Delegate Learning to Automation?: A Comparative Study of LLM Chatbots, Search Engines, and Books: Learning is a key motivator behind information search behavior. With the emergence of LLM-based chatbots, students are increasingly turning to these tools as their primary resource for acquiring knowledge. However, the transition from traditional resources like textbooks and web searches raises concerns among educators. They worry that these fully-automated LLMs might lead students to delegate critical steps of search as learning. In this paper, we systematically uncover three main concerns from educators' perspectives. In response to these concerns, we conducted a mixed-methods study with 92 university students to compare three learning sources with different automation levels. Our results show that LLMs support comprehensive understanding of key concepts without promoting passive learning, though their effectiveness in knowledge retention was limited. Additionally, we found that academic performance impacted both learning outcomes and search patterns. Notably, higher-competence learners engaged more deeply with content through reading-intensive behaviors rather than relying on search activities.<|reference_end|>
@article{yang2024can,
    title={Can We Delegate Learning to Automation?: A Comparative Study of LLM
  Chatbots, Search Engines, and Books},
    author={Yeonsun Yang, Ahyeon Shin, Mincheol Kang, Jiheon Kang, Jean Young Song},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.01396},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2410.01396},
    primaryClass={cs.HC cs.AI cs.IR}
}