Grammaticality illusion or ambiguous interpretation? Event-related potentials reveal the nature of the missing-NP effect in Mandarin centre-embedded structures
<|reference_start|>Grammaticality illusion or ambiguous interpretation? Event-related potentials reveal the nature of the missing-NP effect in Mandarin centre-embedded structures: In several languages, omitting a verb phrase (VP) in double centre-embedded structures creates a grammaticality illusion. Similar illusion also exhibited in Mandarin missing-NP double centre-embedded structures. However, there is no consensus on its very nature. Instead of treating it as grammaticality illusion, we argue that ambiguous interpretations of verbs can best account for this phenomenon in Mandarin. To further support this hypothesis, we conducted two electroencephalography (EEG) experiments on quasi double centre-embedded structures whose complexity is reduced by placing the self-embedding relative clauses into the sentence's subject position. Experiment 1 showed that similar phenomenon even exhibited in this structure, evidenced by an absence of P600 effect and a presence of N400 effect. In Experiment 2, providing semantic cues to reduce ambiguity dispelled this illusion, as evidenced by a P600 effect. We interpret the results under garden-path theory and propose that word-order difference may account for this cross-linguistic variation.<|reference_end|>
@article{yang2024grammaticality,
    title={Grammaticality illusion or ambiguous interpretation? Event-related
  potentials reveal the nature of the missing-NP effect in Mandarin
  centre-embedded structures},
    author={Qihang Yang, Caimei Yang, Yu Liao, Ziman Zhuang},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.11282},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2402.11282},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}