Rethinking the Expressiveness of GNNs: A Computational Model Perspective
<|reference_start|>Rethinking the Expressiveness of GNNs: A Computational Model Perspective: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are extensively employed in graph machine learning, with considerable research focusing on their expressiveness. Current studies often assess GNN expressiveness by comparing them to the Weisfeiler-Lehman (WL) tests or classical graph algorithms. However, we identify three key issues in existing analyses: (1) some studies use preprocessing to enhance expressiveness but overlook its computational costs; (2) some claim the anonymous WL test's limited power while enhancing expressiveness using non-anonymous features, creating a mismatch; and (3) some characterize message-passing GNNs (MPGNNs) with the CONGEST model but make unrealistic assumptions about computational resources, allowing $\textsf{NP-Complete}$ problems to be solved in $O(m)$ depth. We contend that a well-defined computational model is urgently needed to serve as the foundation for discussions on GNN expressiveness. To address these issues, we introduce the Resource-Limited CONGEST (RL-CONGEST) model, incorporating optional preprocessing and postprocessing to form a framework for analyzing GNN expressiveness. Our framework sheds light on computational aspects, including the computational hardness of hash functions in the WL test and the role of virtual nodes in reducing network capacity. Additionally, we suggest that high-order GNNs correspond to first-order model-checking problems, offering new insights into their expressiveness.<|reference_end|>
@article{cui2024rethinking,
    title={Rethinking the Expressiveness of GNNs: A Computational Model Perspective},
    author={Guanyu Cui, Zhewei Wei, Hsin-Hao Su},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.01308},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2410.01308},
    primaryClass={cs.LG cs.AI}
}