Challenging the Need for Packet Spraying in Large-Scale Distributed Training
<|reference_start|>Challenging the Need for Packet Spraying in Large-Scale Distributed Training: Large-scale distributed training in production datacenters constitutes a challenging workload bottlenecked by network communication. In response, both major industry players (e.g., Ultra Ethernet Consortium) and parts of academia have surprisingly, and almost unanimously, agreed that packet spraying is necessary to improve the performance of large-scale distributed training workloads.   In this paper, we challenge this prevailing belief and pose the question: How close can a singlepath transport approach an optimal multipath transport? We demonstrate that singlepath transport (from a NIC's perspective) is sufficient and can perform nearly as well as an ideal multipath transport with packet spraying, particularly in the context of distributed training in leaf-spine topologies. Our assertion is based on four key observations about workloads driven by collective communication patterns: (i) flows within a collective start almost simultaneously, (ii) flow sizes are nearly equal, (iii) the completion time of a collective is more crucial than individual flow completion times, and (iv) flows can be split upon arrival. We analytically prove that singlepath transport, using minimal flow splitting (at the application layer), is equivalent to an ideal multipath transport with packet spraying in terms of maximum congestion. Our preliminary evaluations support our claims. This paper suggests an alternative agenda for developing next-generation transport protocols tailored for large-scale distributed training.<|reference_end|>
@article{addanki2024challenging,
    title={Challenging the Need for Packet Spraying in Large-Scale Distributed
  Training},
    author={Vamsi Addanki, Prateesh Goyal, Ilias Marinos},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.00550},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2407.00550},
    primaryClass={cs.NI cs.DC}
}