Evaluating Language Models for Generating and Judging Programming Feedback
<|reference_start|>Evaluating Language Models for Generating and Judging Programming Feedback: The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has transformed research and practice in a wide range of domains. Within the computing education research (CER) domain, LLMs have received plenty of attention especially in the context of learning programming. Much of the work on LLMs in CER has however focused on applying and evaluating proprietary models. In this article, we evaluate the efficiency of open-source LLMs in generating high-quality feedback for programming assignments, and in judging the quality of the programming feedback, contrasting the results against proprietary models. Our evaluations on a dataset of students' submissions to Python introductory programming exercises suggest that the state-of-the-art open-source LLMs (Meta's Llama3) are almost on-par with proprietary models (GPT-4o) in both the generation and assessment of programming feedback. We further demonstrate the efficiency of smaller LLMs in the tasks, and highlight that there are a wide range of LLMs that are accessible even for free for educators and practitioners.<|reference_end|>
@article{koutcheme2024evaluating,
    title={Evaluating Language Models for Generating and Judging Programming
  Feedback},
    author={Charles Koutcheme, Nicola Dainese, Arto Hellas, Sami Sarsa, Juho
  Leinonen, Syed Ashraf, Paul Denny},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.04873},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2407.04873},
    primaryClass={cs.AI cs.CY}
}