Understanding Transformer Reasoning Capabilities via Graph Algorithms
<|reference_start|>Understanding Transformer Reasoning Capabilities via Graph Algorithms: Which transformer scaling regimes are able to perfectly solve different classes of algorithmic problems? While tremendous empirical advances have been attained by transformer-based neural networks, a theoretical understanding of their algorithmic reasoning capabilities in realistic parameter regimes is lacking. We investigate this question in terms of the network's depth, width, and number of extra tokens for algorithm execution. Our novel representational hierarchy separates 9 algorithmic reasoning problems into classes solvable by transformers in different realistic parameter scaling regimes. We prove that logarithmic depth is necessary and sufficient for tasks like graph connectivity, while single-layer transformers with small embedding dimensions can solve contextual retrieval tasks. We also support our theoretical analysis with ample empirical evidence using the GraphQA benchmark. These results show that transformers excel at many graph reasoning tasks, even outperforming specialized graph neural networks.<|reference_end|>
@article{sanford2024understanding,
    title={Understanding Transformer Reasoning Capabilities via Graph Algorithms},
    author={Clayton Sanford, Bahare Fatemi, Ethan Hall, Anton Tsitsulin, Mehran
  Kazemi, Jonathan Halcrow, Bryan Perozzi, Vahab Mirrokni},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.18512},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2405.18512},
    primaryClass={cs.LG cs.AI}
}