Exact Analysis of Dodgson Elections: Lewis Carroll's 1876 Voting System is Complete for Parallel Access to NP
<|reference_start|>Exact Analysis of Dodgson Elections: Lewis Carroll's 1876 Voting System is Complete for Parallel Access to NP: In 1876, Lewis Carroll proposed a voting system in which the winner is the candidate who with the fewest changes in voters' preferences becomes a Condorcet winner---a candidate who beats all other candidates in pairwise majority-rule elections. Bartholdi, Tovey, and Trick provided a lower bound---NP-hardness---on the computational complexity of determining the election winner in Carroll's system. We provide a stronger lower bound and an upper bound that matches our lower bound. In particular, determining the winner in Carroll's system is complete for parallel access to NP, i.e., it is complete for $\thetatwo$, for which it becomes the most natural complete problem known. It follows that determining the winner in Carroll's elections is not NP-complete unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses.<|reference_end|>
@article{hemaspaandra1999exact,
    title={Exact Analysis of Dodgson Elections: Lewis Carroll's 1876 Voting System
  is Complete for Parallel Access to NP},
    author={Edith Hemaspaandra, Lane A. Hemaspaandra and Joerg Rothe},
    journal={Journal of the ACM vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 806--825, 1997},
    year={1999},
    number={earlier version appeared as University of Rochester TR-96-640},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={cs/9907036},
    primaryClass={cs.CC}
}