Sensitivity Sampling for $k$-Means: Worst Case and Stability Optimal Coreset Bounds
<|reference_start|>Sensitivity Sampling for $k$-Means: Worst Case and Stability Optimal Coreset Bounds: Coresets are arguably the most popular compression paradigm for center-based clustering objectives such as $k$-means. Given a point set $P$, a coreset $\Omega$ is a small, weighted summary that preserves the cost of all candidate solutions $S$ up to a $(1\pm \varepsilon)$ factor. For $k$-means in $d$-dimensional Euclidean space the cost for solution $S$ is $\sum_{p\in P}\min_{s\in S}\|p-s\|^2$.   A very popular method for coreset construction, both in theory and practice, is Sensitivity Sampling, where points are sampled in proportion to their importance. We show that Sensitivity Sampling yields optimal coresets of size $\tilde{O}(k/\varepsilon^2\min(\sqrt{k},\varepsilon^{-2}))$ for worst-case instances. Uniquely among all known coreset algorithms, for well-clusterable data sets with $\Omega(1)$ cost stability, Sensitivity Sampling gives coresets of size $\tilde{O}(k/\varepsilon^2)$, improving over the worst-case lower bound. Notably, Sensitivity Sampling does not have to know the cost stability in order to exploit it: It is appropriately sensitive to the clusterability of the data set while being oblivious to it.   We also show that any coreset for stable instances consisting of only input points must have size $\Omega(k/\varepsilon^2)$. Our results for Sensitivity Sampling also extend to the $k$-median problem, and more general metric spaces.<|reference_end|>
@article{bansal2024sensitivity,
    title={Sensitivity Sampling for $k$-Means: Worst Case and Stability Optimal
  Coreset Bounds},
    author={Nikhil Bansal, Vincent Cohen-Addad, Milind Prabhu, David Saulpic,
  Chris Schwiegelshohn},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.01339},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2405.01339},
    primaryClass={cs.DS}
}