CodeJudge: Evaluating Code Generation with Large Language Models
<|reference_start|>CodeJudge: Evaluating Code Generation with Large Language Models: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising performance in code generation. However, how to reliably evaluate code generated by LLMs remains an unresolved problem. This paper presents CodeJudge, a code evaluation framework that leverages LLMs to evaluate the semantic correctness of generated code without the need for test cases. We investigate different ways to guide the LLM in performing "slow thinking" to arrive at an in-depth and reliable evaluation. We experimented with four LLMs as evaluators on four code generation datasets and five programming languages. The results show that CodeJudge significantly outperformed existing methods in most settings. Furthermore, compared with a SOTA GPT-3.5-based code evaluation method, CodeJudge achieved better results even when using a much smaller model, Llama-3-8B-Instruct. Our code and datasets are available on GitHub https://github.com/VichyTong/CodeJudge.<|reference_end|>
@article{tong2024codejudge:,
    title={CodeJudge: Evaluating Code Generation with Large Language Models},
    author={Weixi Tong, Tianyi Zhang},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02184},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2410.02184},
    primaryClass={cs.LG cs.CL cs.SE}
}