Your Large Language Models Are Leaving Fingerprints
<|reference_start|>Your Large Language Models Are Leaving Fingerprints: It has been shown that finetuned transformers and other supervised detectors effectively distinguish between human and machine-generated text in some situations arXiv:2305.13242, but we find that even simple classifiers on top of n-gram and part-of-speech features can achieve very robust performance on both in- and out-of-domain data. To understand how this is possible, we analyze machine-generated output text in five datasets, finding that LLMs possess unique fingerprints that manifest as slight differences in the frequency of certain lexical and morphosyntactic features. We show how to visualize such fingerprints, describe how they can be used to detect machine-generated text and find that they are even robust across textual domains. We find that fingerprints are often persistent across models in the same model family (e.g. llama-13b vs. llama-65b) and that models fine-tuned for chat are easier to detect than standard language models, indicating that LLM fingerprints may be directly induced by the training data.<|reference_end|>
@article{mcgovern2024your,
    title={Your Large Language Models Are Leaving Fingerprints},
    author={Hope McGovern and Rickard Stureborg and Yoshi Suhara and Dimitris
  Alikaniotis},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14057},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2405.14057},
    primaryClass={cs.CL cs.AI}
}