Adversarial Suffixes May Be Features Too!
<|reference_start|>Adversarial Suffixes May Be Features Too!: Despite significant ongoing efforts in safety alignment, large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 and LLaMA 3 remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that can induce harmful behaviors, including those triggered by adversarial suffixes. Building on prior research, we hypothesize that these adversarial suffixes are not mere bugs but may represent features that can dominate the LLM's behavior. To evaluate this hypothesis, we conduct several experiments. First, we demonstrate that benign features can be effectively made to function as adversarial suffixes, i.e., we develop a feature extraction method to extract sample-agnostic features from benign dataset in the form of suffixes and show that these suffixes may effectively compromise safety alignment. Second, we show that adversarial suffixes generated from jailbreak attacks may contain meaningful features, i.e., appending the same suffix to different prompts results in responses exhibiting specific characteristics. Third, we show that such benign-yet-safety-compromising features can be easily introduced through fine-tuning using only benign datasets, i.e., even in the absence of harmful content. This highlights the critical risk posed by dominating benign features in the training data and calls for further research to reinforce LLM safety alignment. Our code and data is available at \url{https://github.com/suffix-maybe-feature/adver-suffix-maybe-features}.<|reference_end|>
@article{zhao2024adversarial,
    title={Adversarial Suffixes May Be Features Too!},
    author={Wei Zhao, Zhe Li, Yige Li, Jun Sun},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.00451},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2410.00451},
    primaryClass={cs.CR cs.AI cs.CL}
}