What Does Evaluation of Explainable Artificial Intelligence Actually Tell Us? A Case for Compositional and Contextual Validation of XAI Building Blocks
<|reference_start|>What Does Evaluation of Explainable Artificial Intelligence Actually Tell Us? A Case for Compositional and Contextual Validation of XAI Building Blocks: Despite significant progress, evaluation of explainable artificial intelligence remains elusive and challenging. In this paper we propose a fine-grained validation framework that is not overly reliant on any one facet of these sociotechnical systems, and that recognises their inherent modular structure: technical building blocks, user-facing explanatory artefacts and social communication protocols. While we concur that user studies are invaluable in assessing the quality and effectiveness of explanation presentation and delivery strategies from the explainees' perspective in a particular deployment context, the underlying explanation generation mechanisms require a separate, predominantly algorithmic validation strategy that accounts for the technical and human-centred desiderata of their (numerical) outputs. Such a comprehensive sociotechnical utility-based evaluation framework could allow to systematically reason about the properties and downstream influence of different building blocks from which explainable artificial intelligence systems are composed -- accounting for a diverse range of their engineering and social aspects -- in view of the anticipated use case.<|reference_end|>
@article{sokol2024what,
    title={What Does Evaluation of Explainable Artificial Intelligence Actually
  Tell Us? A Case for Compositional and Contextual Validation of XAI Building
  Blocks},
    author={Kacper Sokol and Julia E. Vogt},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12730},
    year={2024},
    doi={10.1145/3613905.3651047},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2403.12730},
    primaryClass={cs.HC cs.AI}
}