InfoNCE: Identifying the Gap Between Theory and Practice
<|reference_start|>InfoNCE: Identifying the Gap Between Theory and Practice: Previous theoretical work on contrastive learning (CL) with InfoNCE showed that, under certain assumptions, the learned representations uncover the ground-truth latent factors. We argue these theories overlook crucial aspects of how CL is deployed in practice. Specifically, they assume that within a positive pair, all latent factors either vary to a similar extent, or that some do not vary at all. However, in practice, positive pairs are often generated using augmentations such as strong cropping to just a few pixels. Hence, a more realistic assumption is that all latent factors change, with a continuum of variability across these factors. We introduce AnInfoNCE, a generalization of InfoNCE that can provably uncover the latent factors in this anisotropic setting, broadly generalizing previous identifiability results in CL. We validate our identifiability results in controlled experiments and show that AnInfoNCE increases the recovery of previously collapsed information in CIFAR10 and ImageNet, albeit at the cost of downstream accuracy. Additionally, we explore and discuss further mismatches between theoretical assumptions and practical implementations, including extensions to hard negative mining and loss ensembles.<|reference_end|>
@article{rusak2024infonce:,
    title={InfoNCE: Identifying the Gap Between Theory and Practice},
    author={Evgenia Rusak, Patrik Reizinger, Attila Juhos, Oliver Bringmann,
  Roland S. Zimmermann, Wieland Brendel},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.00143},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2407.00143},
    primaryClass={cs.LG cs.CV stat.ML}
}