Why Does Differential Privacy with Large Epsilon Defend Against Practical Membership Inference Attacks?
<|reference_start|>Why Does Differential Privacy with Large Epsilon Defend Against Practical Membership Inference Attacks?: For small privacy parameter $\epsilon$, $\epsilon$-differential privacy (DP) provides a strong worst-case guarantee that no membership inference attack (MIA) can succeed at determining whether a person's data was used to train a machine learning model. The guarantee of DP is worst-case because: a) it holds even if the attacker already knows the records of all but one person in the data set; and b) it holds uniformly over all data sets. In practical applications, such a worst-case guarantee may be overkill: practical attackers may lack exact knowledge of (nearly all of) the private data, and our data set might be easier to defend, in some sense, than the worst-case data set. Such considerations have motivated the industrial deployment of DP models with large privacy parameter (e.g. $\epsilon \geq 7$), and it has been observed empirically that DP with large $\epsilon$ can successfully defend against state-of-the-art MIAs. Existing DP theory cannot explain these empirical findings: e.g., the theoretical privacy guarantees of $\epsilon \geq 7$ are essentially vacuous. In this paper, we aim to close this gap between theory and practice and understand why a large DP parameter can prevent practical MIAs. To tackle this problem, we propose a new privacy notion called practical membership privacy (PMP). PMP models a practical attacker's uncertainty about the contents of the private data. The PMP parameter has a natural interpretation in terms of the success rate of a practical MIA on a given data set. We quantitatively analyze the PMP parameter of two fundamental DP mechanisms: the exponential mechanism and Gaussian mechanism. Our analysis reveals that a large DP parameter often translates into a much smaller PMP parameter, which guarantees strong privacy against practical MIAs. Using our findings, we offer principled guidance for practitioners in choosing the DP parameter.<|reference_end|>
@article{lowy2024why,
    title={Why Does Differential Privacy with Large Epsilon Defend Against
  Practical Membership Inference Attacks?},
    author={Andrew Lowy, Zhuohang Li, Jing Liu, Toshiaki Koike-Akino, Kieran
  Parsons, Ye Wang},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.09540},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2402.09540},
    primaryClass={cs.CR cs.AI cs.LG}
}