Reasoning Beyond Bias: A Study on Counterfactual Prompting and Chain of Thought Reasoning
<|reference_start|>Reasoning Beyond Bias: A Study on Counterfactual Prompting and Chain of Thought Reasoning: Language models are known to absorb biases from their training data, leading to predictions driven by statistical regularities rather than semantic relevance. We investigate the impact of these biases on answer choice preferences in the Massive Multi-Task Language Understanding (MMLU) task. Our findings reveal that differences in learned regularities across answer options are predictive of model preferences and mirror human test-taking strategies. To address this issue, we introduce two novel methods: Counterfactual Prompting with Chain of Thought (CoT) and Counterfactual Prompting with Agnostically Primed CoT (APriCoT). We demonstrate that while Counterfactual Prompting with CoT alone is insufficient to mitigate bias, our novel Primed Counterfactual Prompting with CoT approach effectively reduces the influence of base-rate probabilities while improving overall accuracy. Our results suggest that mitigating bias requires a "System-2" like process and that CoT reasoning is susceptible to confirmation bias under some prompting methodologies. Our contributions offer practical solutions for developing more robust and fair language models.<|reference_end|>
@article{moore2024reasoning,
    title={Reasoning Beyond Bias: A Study on Counterfactual Prompting and Chain of
  Thought Reasoning},
    author={Kyle Moore, Jesse Roberts, Thao Pham, Douglas Fisher},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.08651},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2408.08651},
    primaryClass={cs.CL cs.AI}
}