Confounding Privacy and Inverse Composition
<|reference_start|>Confounding Privacy and Inverse Composition: We introduce a novel privacy notion of ($\epsilon, \delta$)-confounding privacy that generalizes both differential privacy and Pufferfish privacy. In differential privacy, sensitive information is contained in the dataset while in Pufferfish privacy, sensitive information determines data distribution. Consequently, both assume a chain-rule relationship between the sensitive information and the output of privacy mechanisms. Confounding privacy, in contrast, considers general causal relationships between the dataset and sensitive information. One of the key properties of differential privacy is that it can be easily composed over multiple interactions with the mechanism that maps private data to publicly shared information. In contrast, we show that the quantification of the privacy loss under the composition of independent ($\epsilon, \delta$)-confounding private mechanisms using the optimal composition of differential privacy \emph{underestimates} true privacy loss. To address this, we characterize an inverse composition framework to tightly implement a target global ($\epsilon_{g}, \delta_{g}$)-confounding privacy under composition while keeping individual mechanisms independent and private. In particular, we propose a novel copula-perturbation method which ensures that (1) each individual mechanism $i$ satisfies a target local ($\epsilon_{i}, \delta_{i}$)-confounding privacy and (2) the target global ($\epsilon_{g}, \delta_{g}$)-confounding privacy is tightly implemented by solving an optimization problem. Finally, we study inverse composition empirically on real datasets.<|reference_end|>
@article{zhang2024confounding,
    title={Confounding Privacy and Inverse Composition},
    author={Tao Zhang, Bradley A. Malin, Netanel Raviv, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik},
    journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.12010},
    year={2024},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    eprint={2408.12010},
    primaryClass={cs.CR}
}