we currently own 67 wireless communications towers that are online and in commercial service . our primary goal is to grow our business through the leasing of antenna space on our existing towers in addition to acquiring and constructing new towers . site leasing revenues are primarily generated from wireless service providers through our long- term leasing contracts . our tenant leases are generally for an initial term that ranges between 5 and 10 years with 3-5 renewal options of five years each . these lease contracts normally include rent escalation rates which range between 3-4 % per year , including the renewal periods . we construct towers under build-to-suit arrangements which allow us to build towers in a location chosen by the wireless provider . we retain ownership of the towers built and the right to co-locate additional tenants . tenant leases are generally paid on a monthly or annual basis . site leasing revenue is recorded monthly on a straight-line basis over the current term of the related lease agreements . annual payments are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized as revenue ratably over 12 months . monthly rental amounts received in advance are recorded as well in deferred revenue and recognized as revenue in the appropriate period . the tower business is not seasonal . however , the availability of towers for acquisition on the market varies from time-to-time . our company , like all of our competitors , is bound to the tower build plans of the various carriers , which are subject to numerous variables outside our control , including the general economy , carrier cash flow , regulatory issues , and consolidation of the wireless industry . we deploy our working capital for the acquisition of third party towers on the open market or for the construction costs of bts towers . we rely , to a large extent , on the wireless carriers build and search ring development plans . possible consolidation in the industry plays a significant role in carrier builds and lease ups . government and utilities agencies ( such as homeland security , local police and fire departments , and port authorities ) provide potential supplementary tower facilities ' leasing income . steel is the major raw material used in the construction of the towers . we use leading contractors to carry out the actual building of the towers . customers our customers are the tenants on our towers and include large national wireless carriers that operate national or regional networks including at & t , sprint , verizon wireless and t-mobile . sales and marketing our sales and marketing goals are to use existing relationships and develop new relationships with wireless service providers to lease antenna space . competition the primary competitors in the site leasing industry are : the independent tower owners who also provide site leasing services ; the national tower development and management companies ; and the wireless service providers who own and operate their own towers and lease antenna space to other providers . we believe that tower location , quality of service to tenants and prices have been and will continue to be the most significant competitive factors affecting the site leasing business . we have been providing site leasing services and development of towers since december 2011 through our subsidiary , cig , llc acquired by us in december 2011 which was operating in the tower business industry since 2009 , so our market share is still minimal . however , we intend to increase our market share through investing in the acquisition and construction of communication towers in addition to providing excellent service to our customers . 20 we compete with independent tower owners who also provide site rental and network services , wireless carriers that build , own and operate their own tower networks and lease space to other wireless communication companies , and owners of alternative facilities , including rooftops , water towers , broadcast towers , das networks , and utility poles . wireless carriers that own and operate their own tower networks generally are substantially larger and have greater financial resources than us . we believe that tower location and capacity , deployment speed , quality of service and price have been and will continue to be the most significant competitive factors affecting the leasing of a tower . competitors in the network services business include site acquisition consultants , zoning consultants , real estate firms , right-of-way consulting firms , construction companies , tower owners and managers , radio frequency engineering consultants , telecommunications equipment vendors who can provide turnkey site development services through multiple subcontractors , and our customers ' internal staffs . we believe that customers will base their decisions on the outsourcing of network services on criteria such as experience , track record , local reputation , price and time for completion of a project . operating costs cost of site leasing revenue primarily consists of straight-lined site rental payments for ground ; property taxes ; site maintenance and monitoring costs ; utilities ; property insurance . other operating costs include lease costs related to our headquarters ; compensation of executives and employees and legal , accounting and administrative costs . employees as of september 30 , 2012 , we had twelve employees , ten of which are located at our headquarters in atlanta , georgia . intellectual property we do not own any patents or trademarks at the present time . we intend to proceed with certain trademark representations as soon as reasonably feasible . story_separator_special_tag however , profit participation rights in the towers ( the “ profit participation ” ) was separately reserved to related party investment funds domiciled in the republic of germany : infratrust zwei gmbh & co. kg , infratrust fünf gmbh & co. kg , and bac infratrust premium neun & co. kg ( collectively , the “ funds ” ) . the respective profit participation rights were previously set forth in three separate atypical silent partnership agreements with cig llc ( the “ asps ” ) . the restructuring was required and requested by the manager of the funds in order to provide a more conventional legal structure for the ownership of our towers , while maintaining substantially the same economic rights for the funds as derived from the towers . pursuant to the restructuring , the funds will now derive their economic rights in the towers through preferred class a membership interests of cig llc , as further described below . in 2011 , the funds were dual chartered as limited partnerships in the state of georgia ( collectively , the “ georgia lps ” ) . the georgia lps are controlled and owned by the funds , as follows : compartment it2 , lp , compartment it5 , lp and compartment it9 , lp corresponding to infratrust zwei gmbh & co. kg , infratrust fünf gmbh & co. kg and bac infratrust premium neun & co. kg , respectively . the cig llc amended and restated operating agreement , dated june 30 , 2012 , ( the “ a & r operating agreement ” ) provides for three preferred class a membership interests : class a-it2 , class a-it5 and class a-it9 ( collectively , the “ class a interests ” ) , issued to compartment it2 , lp , compartment it5 , lp and compartment it9 , lp , respectively . at the closing of the restructuring , the asps were assigned and transferred from the funds to the corresponding georgia lps in connection with the exchange for the class a membership interests . cig llc issued each georgia lp preferred class a membership interests to replicate the profit participation rights previously held through the respective asps prior to the restructuring . the asps terminated upon effectiveness of the exchange for class a interests . the cig llc a & r operating agreement also provides for a class of management membership interests ( the “ management interests ” ) , which were issued to cig towers , llc , our subsidiary . cig , llc will be managed by another subsidiary , cig solutions , llc ( “ cig solutions ” ) , as manager . management of cig , llc remains subject to unanimous consent of the class a interests for certain company actions . as manager , cig solutions will receive a management fee of 1 % of the capital contributions made by the holders of the class a-it2 interests and class a-it9 interests plus any related party loans and a broker fee of 5 % of the gross value of new towers attributable to the class a-it5 interests plus any related party loans . the capital contributions are defined by the value of the tower assets previously underlying the respective asps exchanged for the class a interests . distributions will be made to compartment it2 , lp by cig llc from : ( i ) available funds related to the communication towers attributable to the class a-it2 interests ; and ( ii ) available funds related to any and all communication towers subsequently acquired with proceeds from loans derived from collateralization of towers attributable to the class a-it2 interests , in the following order of priority : 28 1 ) 20 % return in an amount equal to an internal rate of return on the previously contributed capital calculated from february 16 , 2010 , to the holders of the class a-it2 interests ( this 20 % return is contingent upon there being net profits generated from the towers ) ; then 2 ) 80 % to the holders of the class a-it2 interests and 20 % to the holders of the management interests . distributions will be made to compartment it5 , lp by cig llc from : ( i ) available funds related to the communication towers attributable to the class a-it5 interests ; and ( ii ) available funds related to any and all communication towers subsequently acquired with proceeds from loans derived from collateralization of towers attributable to the class a-it5 interests , in the following order of priority : 1 ) 20 % return on its capital contribution , in an amount equal to an internal rate of return on the previously contributed capital calculated from december 21 , 2010 to the holders of the class a-it5 interests ( this 20 % return is contingent upon there being net profits generated from the towers ) ; then 2 ) 80 % to the holders of the class a-it5 interests and 20 % to the holders of the management interests . distributions will be made to compartment it9 , lp by cig llc from : ( i ) available funds related to the communication towers attributable to the class a-it9 interests ; and ( ii ) available funds related to any and all communication towers subsequently acquired with proceeds from loans derived from collateralization of towers attributable to the class a-it9 interests , in the following order of priority : 1 ) 10 % return on its capital contribution , in an amount equal to an internal rate of return on the previously contributed capital calculated from february 26 , 2010 to the holders of the class a-it9 interests ( this 10 % return is contingent upon there being net profits generated from the towers ) ; then 2 ) 80 % to the holders of the class a-it9 interests and 20 % to the holders of the management interests

cash flows from investing activities our cash used in investing activities was $ 4.3 million during the period of december 1 , 2011 to september 30 , 2012 which mainly consisted of $ 1.5 million related to payments for the construction of communication towers and purchase of software and equipment and $ 2.5 million spent the acquisition of communication towers of the towers of texas acquisition presented net of the cash acquired from the acquisition of cig , llc of $ 1.0 million . the cig , llc acquisition was consummated as a non-cash transaction through the issuance of 750,000 of common shares of cig wireless . in addition , there was an increase in restricted cash resulting from the reserve interest account required in accordance with the terms of our credit facility as well as preferred stock subscriptions for which preferred shares were in the process of being issued as of september 30 , 2012. the predecessor entity 's net cash provided by investing activities for the two months ended november 30 , 2011 was $ 0.1 million , consisting of the proceeds from sale of one communication tower of $ 0.4 million partially offset by $ 0.3 million spent on construction of communication towers . for the year ended september 30 , 2011 , the predecessor entity 's net cash used in investing activities was $ 0.4 million consisting of $ 5.2 million spent on the construction of towers partially offset by the proceeds of approximately $ 4.8 million from the sale of communication towers .


 Write a concise suspicious activity report of the following text delimited by triple backquotes. Return your response as a formal report which covers the key points highlighting the location,dates,entity names and account holder information in chronological order of the text.
     ```cash flows from investing activities our cash used in investing activities was $ 4.3 million during the period of december 1 , 2011 to september 30 , 2012 which mainly consisted of $ 1.5 million related to payments for the construction of communication towers and purchase of software and equipment and $ 2.5 million spent the acquisition of communication towers of the towers of texas acquisition presented net of the cash acquired from the acquisition of cig , llc of $ 1.0 million . the cig , llc acquisition was consummated as a non-cash transaction through the issuance of 750,000 of common shares of cig wireless . in addition , there was an increase in restricted cash resulting from the reserve interest account required in accordance with the terms of our credit facility as well as preferred stock subscriptions for which preferred shares were in the process of being issued as of september 30 , 2012. the predecessor entity 's net cash provided by investing activities for the two months ended november 30 , 2011 was $ 0.1 million , consisting of the proceeds from sale of one communication tower of $ 0.4 million partially offset by $ 0.3 million spent on construction of communication towers . for the year ended september 30 , 2011 , the predecessor entity 's net cash used in investing activities was $ 0.4 million consisting of $ 5.2 million spent on the construction of towers partially offset by the proceeds of approximately $ 4.8 million from the sale of communication towers .
```    
 Suspicious Activity Report : we currently own 67 wireless communications towers that are online and in commercial service . our primary goal is to grow our business through the leasing of antenna space on our existing towers in addition to acquiring and constructing new towers . site leasing revenues are primarily generated from wireless service providers through our long- term leasing contracts . our tenant leases are generally for an initial term that ranges between 5 and 10 years with 3-5 renewal options of five years each . these lease contracts normally include rent escalation rates which range between 3-4 % per year , including the renewal periods . we construct towers under build-to-suit arrangements which allow us to build towers in a location chosen by the wireless provider . we retain ownership of the towers built and the right to co-locate additional tenants . tenant leases are generally paid on a monthly or annual basis . site leasing revenue is recorded monthly on a straight-line basis over the current term of the related lease agreements . annual payments are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized as revenue ratably over 12 months . monthly rental amounts received in advance are recorded as well in deferred revenue and recognized as revenue in the appropriate period . the tower business is not seasonal . however , the availability of towers for acquisition on the market varies from time-to-time . our company , like all of our competitors , is bound to the tower build plans of the various carriers , which are subject to numerous variables outside our control , including the general economy , carrier cash flow , regulatory issues , and consolidation of the wireless industry . we deploy our working capital for the acquisition of third party towers on the open market or for the construction costs of bts towers . we rely , to a large extent , on the wireless carriers build and search ring development plans . possible consolidation in the industry plays a significant role in carrier builds and lease ups . government and utilities agencies ( such as homeland security , local police and fire departments , and port authorities ) provide potential supplementary tower facilities ' leasing income . steel is the major raw material used in the construction of the towers . we use leading contractors to carry out the actual building of the towers . customers our customers are the tenants on our towers and include large national wireless carriers that operate national or regional networks including at & t , sprint , verizon wireless and t-mobile . sales and marketing our sales and marketing goals are to use existing relationships and develop new relationships with wireless service providers to lease antenna space . competition the primary competitors in the site leasing industry are : the independent tower owners who also provide site leasing services ; the national tower development and management companies ; and the wireless service providers who own and operate their own towers and lease antenna space to other providers . we believe that tower location , quality of service to tenants and prices have been and will continue to be the most significant competitive factors affecting the site leasing business . we have been providing site leasing services and development of towers since december 2011 through our subsidiary , cig , llc acquired by us in december 2011 which was operating in the tower business industry since 2009 , so our market share is still minimal . however , we intend to increase our market share through investing in the acquisition and construction of communication towers in addition to providing excellent service to our customers . 20 we compete with independent tower owners who also provide site rental and network services , wireless carriers that build , own and operate their own tower networks and lease space to other wireless communication companies , and owners of alternative facilities , including rooftops , water towers , broadcast towers , das networks , and utility poles . wireless carriers that own and operate their own tower networks generally are substantially larger and have greater financial resources than us . we believe that tower location and capacity , deployment speed , quality of service and price have been and will continue to be the most significant competitive factors affecting the leasing of a tower . competitors in the network services business include site acquisition consultants , zoning consultants , real estate firms , right-of-way consulting firms , construction companies , tower owners and managers , radio frequency engineering consultants , telecommunications equipment vendors who can provide turnkey site development services through multiple subcontractors , and our customers ' internal staffs . we believe that customers will base their decisions on the outsourcing of network services on criteria such as experience , track record , local reputation , price and time for completion of a project . operating costs cost of site leasing revenue primarily consists of straight-lined site rental payments for ground ; property taxes ; site maintenance and monitoring costs ; utilities ; property insurance . other operating costs include lease costs related to our headquarters ; compensation of executives and employees and legal , accounting and administrative costs . employees as of september 30 , 2012 , we had twelve employees , ten of which are located at our headquarters in atlanta , georgia . intellectual property we do not own any patents or trademarks at the present time . we intend to proceed with certain trademark representations as soon as reasonably feasible . story_separator_special_tag however , profit participation rights in the towers ( the “ profit participation ” ) was separately reserved to related party investment funds domiciled in the republic of germany : infratrust zwei gmbh & co. kg , infratrust fünf gmbh & co. kg , and bac infratrust premium neun & co. kg ( collectively , the “ funds ” ) . the respective profit participation rights were previously set forth in three separate atypical silent partnership agreements with cig llc ( the “ asps ” ) . the restructuring was required and requested by the manager of the funds in order to provide a more conventional legal structure for the ownership of our towers , while maintaining substantially the same economic rights for the funds as derived from the towers . pursuant to the restructuring , the funds will now derive their economic rights in the towers through preferred class a membership interests of cig llc , as further described below . in 2011 , the funds were dual chartered as limited partnerships in the state of georgia ( collectively , the “ georgia lps ” ) . the georgia lps are controlled and owned by the funds , as follows : compartment it2 , lp , compartment it5 , lp and compartment it9 , lp corresponding to infratrust zwei gmbh & co. kg , infratrust fünf gmbh & co. kg and bac infratrust premium neun & co. kg , respectively . the cig llc amended and restated operating agreement , dated june 30 , 2012 , ( the “ a & r operating agreement ” ) provides for three preferred class a membership interests : class a-it2 , class a-it5 and class a-it9 ( collectively , the “ class a interests ” ) , issued to compartment it2 , lp , compartment it5 , lp and compartment it9 , lp , respectively . at the closing of the restructuring , the asps were assigned and transferred from the funds to the corresponding georgia lps in connection with the exchange for the class a membership interests . cig llc issued each georgia lp preferred class a membership interests to replicate the profit participation rights previously held through the respective asps prior to the restructuring . the asps terminated upon effectiveness of the exchange for class a interests . the cig llc a & r operating agreement also provides for a class of management membership interests ( the “ management interests ” ) , which were issued to cig towers , llc , our subsidiary . cig , llc will be managed by another subsidiary , cig solutions , llc ( “ cig solutions ” ) , as manager . management of cig , llc remains subject to unanimous consent of the class a interests for certain company actions . as manager , cig solutions will receive a management fee of 1 % of the capital contributions made by the holders of the class a-it2 interests and class a-it9 interests plus any related party loans and a broker fee of 5 % of the gross value of new towers attributable to the class a-it5 interests plus any related party loans . the capital contributions are defined by the value of the tower assets previously underlying the respective asps exchanged for the class a interests . distributions will be made to compartment it2 , lp by cig llc from : ( i ) available funds related to the communication towers attributable to the class a-it2 interests ; and ( ii ) available funds related to any and all communication towers subsequently acquired with proceeds from loans derived from collateralization of towers attributable to the class a-it2 interests , in the following order of priority : 28 1 ) 20 % return in an amount equal to an internal rate of return on the previously contributed capital calculated from february 16 , 2010 , to the holders of the class a-it2 interests ( this 20 % return is contingent upon there being net profits generated from the towers ) ; then 2 ) 80 % to the holders of the class a-it2 interests and 20 % to the holders of the management interests . distributions will be made to compartment it5 , lp by cig llc from : ( i ) available funds related to the communication towers attributable to the class a-it5 interests ; and ( ii ) available funds related to any and all communication towers subsequently acquired with proceeds from loans derived from collateralization of towers attributable to the class a-it5 interests , in the following order of priority : 1 ) 20 % return on its capital contribution , in an amount equal to an internal rate of return on the previously contributed capital calculated from december 21 , 2010 to the holders of the class a-it5 interests ( this 20 % return is contingent upon there being net profits generated from the towers ) ; then 2 ) 80 % to the holders of the class a-it5 interests and 20 % to the holders of the management interests . distributions will be made to compartment it9 , lp by cig llc from : ( i ) available funds related to the communication towers attributable to the class a-it9 interests ; and ( ii ) available funds related to any and all communication towers subsequently acquired with proceeds from loans derived from collateralization of towers attributable to the class a-it9 interests , in the following order of priority : 1 ) 10 % return on its capital contribution , in an amount equal to an internal rate of return on the previously contributed capital calculated from february 26 , 2010 to the holders of the class a-it9 interests ( this 10 % return is contingent upon there being net profits generated from the towers ) ; then 2 ) 80 % to the holders of the class a-it9 interests and 20 % to the holders of the management interests

