None
Freeman plan Grunsky plan Manson plan San Joaquin River crossing 269-270 Stanislaus River project 308 Trial location line — For steel pipe, San Joaquin Valley 262-263, 267-2(^ For tunnels, Hetch Hetchy aqueduct 261 Tributaries — Alameda Creek 188 McCloud River 334 Stanislaus River 303-304 Truckee-Carson project tunnels 250 Truck gardening — Niles Cone 92-94 Surplus water available for 21 Tuberculation, steel pipe 229 Tulloch, Mr., rights owned by 307 Tunnel — Cost cheapened by paying bonuses 226 Grade, San Joaquin Valley 265 Lining, thickness of 242 Near Knight's Ferry 276 Near San Mateo 123 On peninsula 1 23 To Lake Chabot 125 Under bay 321 Under Lake Eleanor 25, 27 Tunnel capacity — American-Cosumnes project 313 Grunsky plan 1 40 73 227 328 371-372 141 201 100 298 300-301 119 166 15 249 276 225 269 270 253 142 139 139 THE HETCH HETCHY WATER SUPPLY FOR SAN FRANCISCO 21, Tunnel capacity — Larger capacity costs relatively little more Stanislaus River project Tunnel construction — Grunsky plan Hetch Hetchy aqueduct Tunneling — Character of rocks Conditions for Hetch Hetchy aqueduct Rock formation Tunnels — Alternative distribution aqueducts Costs 242-243 Depth of Diameter of Formula for computing carrying capacity Freeman plan of development Grunsky plan of development Hetch Hetchy aqueduct. 1 1. 20-21 , 1 21 -1 22, 221 -228, 243- Hydraulic elements Hydraulic gradient of Klamath project Lincoln Mine Lining of Los Angeles aqueduct 1 28, Manson plan of development Mokelumne River project Peninsula pipe line Reconnoitering line of Retarding effect of moss-like growth Rocks to be encountered Roughness of finish Route of Sacramento River project Salt River project San Joaquin River project Santa Ana Canal Shoshone project Slope of Southern Pacific Railroad Stanislaus River project Sub-strata of rock in Surplus carrying capacity Timbering of 71, 120, 224-225 Truckee-Carson project Unit costs 224-225, Western Pacific Railroad Yakima project Yuba River project Tuolumne — County Water Company 304-305 Diversion canal 1 39 Drainage basm, Stanislaus wafer used in 305 Main canal 1 39 Meadows 59 Tuolumne River — Canyon 264, 277, 282, 284 Canyon crossing 278-279 Catchment areas 8, 24 Discharge 101-103, 373 Flood waters 58 Gaugings 101-103 Line of flow 114-117 Map of 4 Natural flow of 285 Prior rights on 8 Proximity 158-160 Rating table 373 Reservoir sites 58 Run-off 98-99, 101-103, 105 Surplus waters 58 Tables of run-off 374-376 Waste waters 58 Water 53-57, 151, 153, 284, 316-317 Watershed 102, 374 rage 140 308 140 121 111 221 221 71 125-126 250-251 111 122 221 139-140 139-140 249, 261 120 122 250 250 120 223-227 139 369, 372 294 109-110 221 111 221 112-116 320-321 250 320-321 250 250 112-117 250-251 308 71 34 246-249 250 243-251 251 250 356 Page Tuolumne River — Yielding capacity 8, 101-103, 104, 106-107 Tuolumne River project — Advantages of 72-73, 156-157 Comparisons with other sources 151-1601 Concentration of further study on 75 Cost estimates 1 60n- 1 60p Quantity of water available to City 101-103, 106-107 Tuolumne water supply — Adequacy of 80-81 Joint use by bay cities 1 61 - 1 65 Df 299 Management Turbidity — Feather River water Flood waters Pleasanton water Sacramento River water San Joaquin River water San Leandro reservoir Stanislaus water Sunol Valley streams Tuolumne River water Turbid waters, filtration of Turlock Irrigation District — Area irrigated Cost of system Diversion by Excessive use of water Joining with Modesto District Needs of 21, 82-83 Percentage of land irrigated Prior right of 83, 103, 106-107, 285 Quantity of water put to beneficial use 104 Report by J. H. Reservoir 80-81 , Storage, Alameda Creek. Underground waters — Diversion of for outside use. Niles Cone Owens Valley Right of landowner to Superiority of, for irrigation 198 22 28 28 22 62 82 209 180 182-183 82 207 94, 201 85-86 205 69-70 202 208 209 Ix INDEX Underground waters — Supreme Court decisions 97 Underlying strata, Santa Clara Valley 206, 208 Undesirable conditions, Crystal Springs reservoir 62 Undesirabilily of foothill reservoirs 307 Unfavorable conditions — Alameda Creek gaugings 1 81 - 1 83 Cherry dam site 28 Eleanor Lake dam site 28 Uninhabited catchment areas 32-33, 53 Union reservoir 304-306 Union Water Company — Additional supply available 80 Rights claimed on Calaveras 190 System of 177-178 Water rights of 96, 190 Unit costs — Alameda Creek siphon 258, 291 Antioch filter tunnels 228 Antonio-Valle Division 259-260 Bay head pipe 236-237, 253-254 Buriburi tunnel 296 Calaveras-Antonio Division 258-259 Canyon tunnel 249, 286 Chabot tunnel 241 , 291 Corbetl tunnel, Shoshone project 250 Crystal Springs by-pass 298 Crystal Springs- Irvington Division 252-254 Dove Creek pipe line 230 Dry Creek crossing 248, 278 Dry Creek tunnel 278 Early Intake dam 284 Eleanor-Cherry Division 289 Eleanor-Cherry tunnel 289 Elizabeth tunnel 223, 226 Grading ^^' Groveland tunnel 249, 283-284 Hetch Hetchy aqueduct tunnels 243-249 Hatch Hetchy dam 287-288 Hetch Hetchy reservoir site clearing 286 Huntley tunnel 250 Irvington-Calaveras Division 254-255, 258 Irvington-Chabot Division 291 Klamath project tunnels 250 Lincoln Mine tunnels 250 Los Angeles aqueduct tunnels on Los Angeles steel pipe siphons 230 Lumber 251 Manson's estimates, too low I4J Mission Pass tunnel 248, 28 Moccasin Peak tunnel. . . .^ 248, 281 Oakdale Irrigation District's  project, Arizona 25U San Andreas tunnel tti San Antonio pipe line ^co San Antonio tunnel ^''O, Z50 San Bruno tunnel San Joaquin pipe line ^^> '^^^ San Lorenzo Creek siphon San Miguel-Millbrae Division Southern Pacific tunnels. South Fork Canyon crossing • ■ ■ ■ ■■■■ Tesla tunnel 247, 265 Truckee- Carson project tunnels Tunnels through various f"™^'--' 260,- 265, ■278; 281 Valie-Mo;«sin' Division; . . .' 264-265, 269,-270 Valle tunnel ' „,. Western Pacific Railroad tunnels ^-"1 Yakima project tunnel United Properties Company, water rights of United Stales — 197 ^21 Coast Survey, charts of San Francisco Bay '^'' J^< Fish hatchery, McCloud River 334, 336 291 295-296 250-251 283 269, 283 250 283, 291 250 96, 179 United States — Government, exchange of lands with Lands, taking of building materials from Ownership in Hetch Hetchy Valley Reclamation Service, tunnels for on irrigation projects.. United Slates Department of Agriculture — Irrigation, Modesto and Turlock Districts Irrigation, Santa Clara County Soil survey, Livermore United States Geological Survey — Alameda Creek flow Contour maps Feather River gaugings Geologic folios McCloud River gaugings 329, 334, Mokelumne River discharge Niles Canyon gaugings Sacramento River water analyses San Joaquin River water analyses Stanislaus River flow Topographic maps Tuolumne River gaugings Yuba River gaugings Uniting of San Francisco Bay cities in water district University Mound District, inadequate water supply University Mound reservoir 131, 212, 294, Unloading pipe, cost of 230- Unpopulated watershed, Hetch Hetchy Unskilled laborers, wages in California Untimbered tunnels, comparison on cost with timbered tun- nels ■ ....342- Unutilized water from Tuolumne will be diverted by City. . .. Upper Strawberry reservoir Upper Tuolumne River, comparisons with other sources Urban communities, growth in Urgent demand for water Use — Artesian waters • Hetch Hetchy preserving other camp sites Labor-saving appliances for laying pipe lines Percolating waters Roads, Hetch Hetchy, by public Steel pipe permitting cheapest structural methods...... Surplus capacity of Hetch Hetchy aqueduct for irri- gation Use of water — Deprivation of Domestic , From Stanislaus River in Tuolumne basin Increase in Industrial Irrigation Municipal Ulica — Canal Dam Ditch Flume Mining Company Reservoir Utilization of fall — Early Intake Eel River Feather River project Hetch Hetchy to Early Intake McCloud River Stanislaus River Tesla tunnel Page 152 15 13 250 358 78 85 85 108 348 109-110 339-340 365 83-84 317 317 307 239 98 355 9 220 296, 389 231 236 344 251 343, 245 53 304 151-1601 78 175 205 58 231 205-210 13, 15 229 21 205 21 304-305 79 176 21 21 305 306 305 305 304-306 304-306 282 346 350 284 327, 331 305 281 , • r ,, 194-195, 199 Vagaries ot raintall ^^ Vagueness of records, water companies Valle-Moccasin Division— 281, 300 Cost ■ 24K 260 Description 241 , 260, 264 Length • 260-281 Structures on Ix! THE HETCH HETCHY WATER SUPPLY FOR SAN FRANCISCO Page Valle-Moccasin Division — Unit costs 260, 264-265, 269-270, 278-279, 281 Valle tunnel — Cost 260 DeptK below surface 264 Diameter 247, 259 Fonnations 247, 259-260 LengtK of 247. 259 Percentage timbered 247, 260 Shafts 265, 269 Unit costs 247, 260 Vallecito 303 Vallejo Mill 385 Valley rainfall, ratios of mountain run-off to 105 Valleys— Subdivision into irrigated farms 77 Stanislaus River 303 Tributary to San Francisco district 77 Value— ^ Bay Cities Water Company's properties 313 Of hardness In public water supply 317 Of the power asset 31 -32 Spring Valley Water Works 394 Valves, Helch Hetchy aqueduct 20 Vancouver, .growth of 78 Vapor laden winds — Coast Range 1 93 Mt. Hamilton 88 Variability of rainfall, bay region 383 Variance in records, Alameda Creek yield 193 Variation — In flow, McCloud River 334 In run-off 199 Variety of formations, L Varying — Depth to v/ater, wells, Santa Clara Valley Rainfall in California Vastness — Coyote Valley gravel beds 207-209 Santa Clara Valley gravel beds 207-208 Vegetation-^ — Lake Merced Surface waters in California Varying character of . .. Velocities, Hetch Hetchy aqueduct tunnels Velocity — Alameda Creek flow 182 Approach of water, NUes and Sunol dams 182, Arroyo Mocho flow Arroyo Valle flow McCloud River Movement of gravels Water in Hetch Hetchy tunnels Verdure, high altitudes Vernalis Farming Company, buildings of 267. Vernon Lake — - As reserve supply Catchment area City desires to secure rights to Dam at Flow from Location of Power plant at outlet of Reservoir at Road to Vertical cleavage, planes Vested rights — American River Cosumnes River Mokelumne River 366, 370-371 Stanislaus River 304-305 Angeles aqueduct 225-226 208 209 62 62 199 221 185 185 201 201 335 198 121 100 269 58 100 58 58 16 117 160r 28 23 276 312 312 Tuolu Rl. .82-83, 101 Vh Alameda Creek 182-185, 203 Alfalfa irrigation, Gregory Ranch, Decoto 93 Bart Brown well, Arden 93 Boston reservoirs 35, 37, 39, 40-42 Page Views — Buena Vista District -^lo California Nursery Company, irrigating scenes 92-93 Castro Valley dike, site 135-136 Chabot Lake 66 Chestnut Hill reservoir 40-41 Craig Goch dam 51 Croton reservoir 42-43 Decoto 92-93 Eleanor Lake 23 Fairmount District 217 Hetch Hetchy dam site 8 Hetch Hetchy reservoir 6, 10, 12 Hetch Hetchy scenic road 10 Hetch Hetchy Valley 6, 8, 10, 12 57 Irrigating tomatoes. Bell Ranch, Decoto 92 Loch Katrine 48-50 Mahopac Lake ■ 45 Middlesex Fells reservoir 35, 37, 39 Niles 92-93 Nlles Cone 203 Niles Cone wells 92-93 Niles dam 182-183 North Beach District 215 Norwegian roads 14, 17-18 Ocean View District 217-218 Oifjord Lake, Norway 17-18 Parkslde 218 Richmond District 213-214 Road along Oifjord Lake, Norway 17-18 Roads in Norway. ^'^> ^ ^ San Francisco, streets in 213-218 San Leandro dam 66 San Miguel reservoir 130, 133 Scenic road, Hetch Fletchy 16-17, 19 Strawberry farm, Niles 92-93 Sudbury reservoir 42 Sunol dam 184-185 Sunset District 218 Thirlmere Lake 46-47 Tilltill Valley 23 Titicus reservoir 14 Tuolumne Meadows 59 Vyrnwy reservoir 50 Wachuselt dam 35 Wapama Falls 16 Wells on Nlles Cone 92-93 Western Addition 215 Villages on catchment areas 35-36, 54, 303 Virulence of germs lost by storage 37 Visitacion Valley pipe line 296 Visitors to Hetch Hetchy 1 48 Voids, sands and gravels, Livermore Valley 199 Volcanic ash deposits 196 Volume — Of flow 201 Pore space, Livermore Valley gravels. 201 Storm waters, Coyote Creek 209 Von Geldern, report by 187 Von Schmidt, A. Acquired by Spring Valley Water Company ^84 Consolidated into Peoples Water Company 77 East bay region (.am Over-estimated extent of their undeveloped resources. . . OV-ZU Records not dependable Water control during construction — Hetch Hetchy dam ^°| Poopenaut dam Water districts — i^a ice. 1A7 t7l Act governing incorporation of 63 64 MetropoHtan ,, '. San Francisco Bay cities 9, 161-165 Water duty — oe Livermore Valley • • . • ■ oc Modesto Irrigation District Pleasanton Valley Water famine — I27 Danger or • / ' n' ijqi -^q? Peninsula, threatened by boring Ravenswood wells ^5 Reserve against Water level — |Qg Cherry River mouth ^gg Durham Bridge • • ■ ^82 Early Intake Page Water level — Hetch Hetchy dam 285 Hetch Hetchy reservoir II McMullin Lake 266 Moffatt Bridge 108 Power house No. 1 1 09 Priest's Hotel 1 09 Red Mountain Bar 108 San Joaquin River 266-268 South Fork mouth 1 09 Tuolumne River 108-109 Water plane — Coyote Valley gravels 207, 209 Santa Clara Valley gravels 209 Water power development — Feather River 100 Hetch Hetchy aqueduct 128 Los Angeles aqueduct 128 Use of steel pipe for 229 Water power possibilities — Hetch Hetchy aqueduct 29-31 McCloud River 336 Water pressure — Fire hydrants, San Francisco 215, 218-219 Hetch Hetchy aqueduct 121 Inadequacy of in San Francisco 213-214, 216-219 Water rates — Fixing of 170, 177 Metropolitan water district 1 70 Peoples Water Company 1 77 Spring Valley litigation 393-394 Water right purchases — Cost for the several divisions of the Hetch Hetchy Aqueduct 300-301 For Stanislaus River project 308 Water rigrhts — Alameda Creek 96, 187 Arroyo Valle 96 Bay Cities Water Company 96, 179, 186 Bonita Creek 96 Calaveras Creek 187 Cherry Creek 72, 138 Diligent prosecution of work on 341 Eleanor Creek 72, 138 Exoenditures by San Francisco on 72, 138 Isabel Creek 96 Law on 342 Legal questions 96 McCloud River 338-341 Mokelumne River 368, 370 Necessity to secure for future 138 San Francisco's 72, 1 38 Sierra Blue Lakes Water and Power Company 368, 370 Smith's Creek 96 Spring Valley Water Company 384-385 Time after posting of notice for beginning of construc- tion work on 341 Tuolumne River 72, 138 Union Water Company 96 United Properties Company 96, 179 ^^''ater service areas, San Francisco 212 Water service, San Francisco —. Absence of in certain districts 213-214 Inadequacy, San Francisco J 45 Poor circulation 216 Watersheds — (See "Catchment areas") Water supply — Inadequacy, bay cities 145 Inadequacy, San Francisco |45 Needs of San Francisco district 80 Order of development 62-75 Scale of new works for other cities [45 Water supply problem — Change in conditions since Garfield permit was granted. 138 Los Angeles, solution of 80, 138 New York, solution of 1 38 Ixui THE HETCH HETCHY WATER SUPPLY FOR SAN FRANCISCO Page Water supply problem — San Francisco, solution of 80, 138 Water table — Fluctuating 358 Lowering of 91, 175,186 Niles Cone 91, 95, 175, 204 Rise of 357 Slope of 94 Weak points, Grunsky plan 142, 144 Weedy water. Lake Merced 62 Weight— Bay head pipe 237 Hetch Hetchy pipe 236 San Joaquin pipe 235 Weirs — Alameda Creek 181 Drowning of 181 Gauging 33 Helch Hetchy dam 285 Niles dam 181 Well boring — Livermore Valley 86, 89-90 Records by Cyril Williams, Jr 202 Well drillers' logs 86 Wells— Alameda City 1 74 Alvarado 1 77 Bay shore 82 Bell RancK. Decoto 92-93 Brackish through over-pumping 81 Brooklyn 70 Consumption of water from, bay region 312 Dried up 204 East bay region, draft on 1 74 Fltchburg 1 77 Hercules Water Company 1 78 Livermore Valley 86, 89, 90 Miller Ranch 206-208 Modesto and Turlock Districts 359 Niles Cone 70, 95, 177, 203-204 Output of ) 77 Overflow from 206-207 Owens Valley 202 Private 81. 174 Ravenswood 96 Richmond 1 77 Rising of water in 359 San Francisco 383 San Francisco bay shore 82 San Leandro Cone 1 77 San Lorenzo Cone ^77 San Lorenzo Water Company T 78 San Pablo Cone 1 76- 1 77 Santa Clara Valley 208-209 Santa Fe Railroad Company | 76 Standard Oil Company | 76 Test 70 Union Water Company 1 77 West San Pablo Land and Water Company |78 West Clay Park District, no mains for fire protection 220 West End Improvement Club, complaint, inadequate water supply 218 Western Addition, San Francisco — Complaints of inadequate water supply 21 I. 214 Inadequate fire protection 21 I, 214 Views 215 Western Pacific Railroad Company- Contract prices for mountain work 251 Exploiting Feather River region 348 Tunnels built by 251 West Richmond District, no mains for fire protection 220 West San Pablo Land and Water Company 174. 