title: The science of society.--no. 1. The true constitution of government in the sovereignty of the individual as the final development of protestantism, democracy, and socialism.
text: ■ / r , mmicz i < x<X\<:- < < c < c ■ <r«ge _\ • <-- esse: c«^ L < r 'CS£<aC I i# LIBRARY OF CONGRESS. [SMITHSONIAN DEPOSIT.] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ..' <r «c<«£ 7€3 ■ c cicc <3 ■-<£. - «G&C ;•'. '-.%•<*< s ■ HW V I^^B^T <&{C^< . 3 |»g<r'tgagr^B IBBCXOK' j^m ; f -<«* < ; C-. «r . • CT^ «^o;CC^ ■ ■ € <Kc<KT *•< ■ «tt<*c:: c c. «c «; c c cfjxxe" ■C s! C£.C:.C tcs^- 1 Cjtj'c cS «OGC CCS'< < i: «9C§B oklo C«3K3 c c c ^ £MM£±S«Z^ <aj8Lc«3K£. I ■ .'<C£-«! •:<*«£<< CJC . e33C<;<, c<t IE 'C--c <a ■ mqhe j c c a c-" v ^TCvS fc« ( . c - 1 . , iv< - c; ^ -: etc" ' £fv " ' 4^ ( cv s. ?*:&&& ' c- - ,» i ■' ■ piiiy-r^a * : i c arc ^ , c- " i'&L'' ■■' : ■■■< ' c <<Sk ■ ••/ &&,2 W ■-, o' ex '.■■$;-'■":" .v '^ ... \^C« ; ' . ' : <•; " ■ CM , . <38L CC x'c' x ' - V- <«■.'■ c*c cc <*--. " < < *£ c c or ^ <: cc cc ?■■«■ ;'«cc" . c; <cc cc -^r c ,-».;-,'JL"*'.., 3C~ -c«so • cc ^w-c 1 ^- ■■... <^ " c ■lifjiK.j si- € mCi\ cc~ cdlP^ C ,' : '^- c«^s: c . . ..-,;"■ WL ■ d ^ • -c crc'- -#zic"€x!p*s ■;■■>■■ c:. rv i * c cc car />,*- ' SCLc"^ ■. CCC C< . , r C <" c\< dc ;;-- x c <® - c c ;-; ;.- S\ : \ "" " f <T ■ ^ " ^ O'x 1£c ; '!•' '"\€<§L. c < ' ; * '" r " r "£ '= <.«>"/', Vt:l 2< , '-«-<' ^ ' - ^te ',-' 'A/C .- c - «r < <c - * 4T <' r> '' < ■ s* < „V > ;( r ; '. c ■■■:' Ci • r ;-<-' ig«J! < • : - • "< < ^ ^38^ 1 Ci/ K C , •' ■<' ' < • J^ 1 >cC _<?• .-• c- <<z r-.r t>v 5f£-c £-<■<-§ CI I 1 <^C ( .c dl 1 < ' I C k THE TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. Cije $mtt nf |nnrtij.-»u. 1. THE TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT SOVEREIGNTY OF THE INDIVIDUAL AS THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT OF PROTESTANTISM, DEMOCRACY, AND SOCIALISM. STEPHEN PEARL ANDREWS. ,-c Q NEW YORK: PUBLISHED BY WILLIAM. J. BANER. 201 WILLIAM STREET. SOLD BY ALL, BOOKSELLERS. 1851. w^ ^ * t-1 Entered, according to Act of Congrcis, in the year 1851, by WILLIAM J. BANES, in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the Southern District of New York. 6TEREOTYPED nV WILLIAM J. BANEB, 201 William Street. INTRODUCTION This little treatise on the True Constitution of Government was delivered as one of the regular course of lectures before the New York Mechanics' Institute, for the present winter. It is now published as the introductory number of a contemplated series of publications, presenting certain new principles of so- ciety, which it is the belief of the author are eminently adapted to supply the felt want of the present day for an adequate so- lution of the existing social disturbances. For the principles in question, either as original discoveries, or else as presented in a new light, as solvents of the knotty questions which are now puzzling the most capacious minds and afflicting the most benevolent hearts of Christendom, the author confesses his very great indebtedness, and he believes the world will yet gladly confess its indebtedness, to the genius of JosiAn War- ren, of Indiana, who has been engaged for more than twenty years in testing, almost in solitude, the practical operation, in the education of children, in the sphere of commerce, and oth- erwise, of the principles which we are now for the first time presenting prominently to the public. It has been the belief of the author, that there are in the ranks of those who are denominated Conservatives many who sym- pathize deeply with the objects of radical reform, but who have never identified themselves with the movements in that direc- tion, either because they have not seen that the. practical meas- ures proposed by the advocates of reform contained the ele- ments of success, or else because they have distinctly perceived or intuitively felt that they did not. They may have been re- pelled, too, by the want of completeness in the programme, the VI INTRODUCTION. want of scientific exactness in the principles announced, or, finally, by the want of a lucid conception of the real nature of the remedy which is needed for the manifold social evils of which ail confess the existence in the actual condition of society. If there are minds in this position, minds more rigid than others in their demands for precise and philosophical principles pre- liminary to action, it is from such that the author anticipates the most cordial reception of the elements propounded by Mr. Warren, so soon as they are seen in their connections and in- terrelations with each other. Believing that these principles will justify the assumption, I have ventured to place at the head of this series of publications as a general title, " The Science of Society." The propriety of the use of the term " Science," in such a connection, may be questioned by some whom habit lias accus- tomed to apply that term to a much lower range of investiga- tions. If researches into the habits of beetles and tadpoles, and their localities and conditions of existence, are entitled to the dignified appellation of Science, certainly similar researches into the nature, the wants, the adaptations, and, so to speak, into the true or requisite moral and social habitat of the spirit- ual animal called Man, must be, if conducted according to the rigid methods of scientific induction from observed facts, equally entitled to that distinction. The series of works, of which this is the first in order, will deal in no vague aspirations after "the good time coming." Tkey will propound definite principles which demand to be re- garded as having all the validity of scientific truths, and which, taken in their co-relations with each other, are adequate to the solution of the social problem. If this pretension be made good, the importance of the subject will not be denied. If not well founded, the definiteness of the propositions mil be favor- able to a speedy and successful refutation. s. p. a. New York, January, 1851. TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. A LECTURE. Ladies and Gentlemen: The subject which I propose to consider this evening is the true constitution of human government. Every age is a remarkable one, no doubt, for those who live in it. When immobility reigns most in human affairs, there is still enough of movement to fix the attention, and even to excite the wonder of those who are immediately in proximity with it. This natural bias in favor of the period with which we have most to do, is by no means sufficient, however, to account for the growing conviction, on all minds, that the present epoch is a marked transition from an old to a new order of things. The scattered rays of the gray dawn of the new era date back, indeed, beyond the life- time of the present generation. The first streak of light that streamed through the dense darkness of the old regime was the declaration by Martin Luther of the right of private judgment in matters of conscience. The next, which shed terror upon the .old world, as a new portent of impending revolutions, was the denial, by Hampden, Sidney, Cromwell, and others, of the divine right of kings, and the assertion of inherent 8 TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. political rights in the people themselves. This was followed by the American Declaration of Independence, the establishment of a powerful Democratic Republic in the western world upon the basis of that principle, fol- lowed by the French Revolution, the Reign of Terror, the Reaction, and the apparent death in Europe of the Democratic idea. Finally, in our day, comes the red glare of French Socialism, at which the world is still gazing with uncertainty whether it be some lurid and meteoric omen of fearful events, or whether it be not the actual rising of the Sun of Righteousness, with heal- ing in His wings ; for there are those who profoundly and religiously believe that the solution of the social problem will be the virtual descent of the New Jerusa- lem — the installation of the kingdom of heaven upon earth. First in the religious, then in the political, and finally in the social relations of men, new doctrines have thus been broached, which are full of promise to the hopeful, and full of alarm and dismay to the timid and conserv- ative. This distinction marks the broadest division in the ranks of mankind. In church, and state, and social life, the real parties are the Progressionists and the Re- trogressionists — those whose most brilliant imaginings are linked with the future, and those whose sweetest remembrances bind them in tender associations to the past. Catholic and Protestant, Whig and Democrat, Anti-Socialist and Socialist, are terms which, in their origin, correspond to this generic division ; but no sooner does a new classification take place than the parties thus formed are again subdivided, on either hand, by the ever-permeating tendency, on the one side toward TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. 9 freedom, emancipation, and progress, and toward law, and order, and immobility on the other. Hitherto the struggle between conservatism and pro- gress has seemed doubtful. Victory has kissed the ban- ner, alternately, of either host. At length the serried ranks of conservatism falter. Reform, so called, is becoming confessedly more potent than its antagonist. The admission is reluctantly forced from pallid lips that revolutions — political, social, and religious — constitute the programme of the coming age. .Reform, so called, for weal or woe, but yet Reform, must rule the hour. The older constitutions of society have outlived their day. No truth commends itself more universally to the minds of men now, than that thus set forth by Car- lyle : " There must be a new world if there is to be any world at all. That human things in our Europe can ever return to the old sorry routine, and proceed with any steadiness or continuance there — this small hope is not now a tenable one. These days of universal death must be days of universal new birth if the ruin is not to be total and final ! It is a time to make the dullest man consider, and ask himself, Whence he came 1 ? Whither he is bound 1 A veritable ' New Era,' to the foolish as well as to the wise." Nor is this state of things confined to Europe. The agitations in America may be more peaceful, but they are not less profound. The foundations of old beliefs and habits of thought are breaking up. The old guarantees of order are fast falling away. A veritable " new era" with us, too, is alike impending and inevitable. What remains to be done, then, for wise men, is clearly this : to attempt to penetrate the future by in- 10 TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. vestigating the past and the present, to ascertain whether there be not elements of calculation capable of fixing with tolerable certainty the precise point in the sidereal heavens of human destiny, toward which our whole system is confessedly verging with accelerated velocity. To penetrate the gloom which encircles the orbit of our future progression, might, at least, end the torture of suspense, even to those who may be least content with the nature of the solution. "If," says Carlyle again, " the accursed nightmare that is crush- ing out the life of us and ours, would take a shape, ap- proach us like the Hyrcanian tiger, the Behemoth of Caos, or the Archfiend himself — in any shape that we could see and fasten on — a man can have himself shot with cheerfulness, but it needs that he shall clearly see for what." It is, then, neither unbecoming nor inappropriate, at this time, to attempt to prognosticate, by philosophical deductions from operative principles, the characteristics of the new society which is to be constructed out of the fragments of the old. It is, perhaps, only right that I should begin by declaring the general nature of the re- sults to which my own mind is conducted by the specu- lations I have made upon the subject, and toward which I shall, so far as I may, endeavor, this evening, to sway your convictions. I avow, that for one, I take the hopeful, the expectant, even the exulting view of the prospects of humanity, under the influence of causes which, to the minds of many, are pregnant with evil. I hail the progress of that unsparing criticism of old institutions which is the characteristic of the present age. I hail with still TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. 11 higher enthusiasm, a dim outline which begins to be perceived by the keenest vision, through the twilight mists which yet hang upon the surrounding hilltops of a social fabric, whose foundations are equity, whose ceiling is security, whose pillars are co-operation and fraternity, and whose capitals and cornices are carved into the graceful forms of mutual urbanity and polite- ness. It is just to you that I should announce this faith, that you may receive the vaticinations of the prophet, with due allowance for the inebriation of the prophetic rhapsody. I proclaim myself in some sense a visionary ; but in all ages there have been visionaries whose visions of to-day have proved the substantial re- alities of to-morrow. I shall make no apology for the rashness of the at- tempt to trace, with a distinct outline, some of the gi- gantic changes which will occur in the social organiza- tion of the world as the necessary outgrowth of princi- ples now at work, and which are becoming every day more potential, in proportion as forces, which have hitherto been deemed antagonistic, converge and co- operate. I affirm, then, firstly, that there is at this day a marked convergence and a prospective co-operation of principles which have hitherto resisted each other, or, more properly, a development of one common principle in spheres of life so diverse from each other that they have hitherto been regarded as 'unrelated, if not posi- tively antagonistic. I assert, and shall endeavor to make good the assertion, that the essential spirit, the vital and fundamental principle of the three great mod- ern movements to which I have already alluded, namely, 12 TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. the Protestant Reformation, the Democratic Revolution, still progressing, and, finally, the Socialist Agitation, which is spreading in multiform varieties of reproduc- tion over the whole civilized world, is one and the same, and that this common affinity is beginning in various ways to be recognized or felt. If this assertion be true, it is one of immense significance. If Protest- antism, Democracy, and Socialism are merely different expressions of the same idea, then, undoubtedly, the confluent force of these three movements will expand tremendously the sweep of their results, in the direc- tion toward which they collectively tend. What, then, if this be so, is this common element 1 In what great feature are Protestantism, Democracy, and Socialism identical ? I will answer this interroga- tory first, and demonstrate the answer afterward. Protestantism, Democracy, and Socialism are identical in the assertion of the Supremacy of the Individual — a dogma essentially contumacious, revolutionary, and an- tagonistic to the basis principles of all the older institu- tions of society, which make the Individual subordinate and subject to the Church, to the State, and to Society respectively. Not only is this supremacy or sovereign- ty of the individual a common element of all three of these great modern movements, but I will make the still more sweeping assertion, that it is substantially the whole of those movements. It is not merely a feature as I have just denominated it, but the living soul itself, the vital energy, the integral essence or being of them all. Protestants and Protestant churches may differ in relation to every other article of their creed, and do so TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. 13 differ, without ceasing to be Protestants, so long as they assert the paramount right of private or individual judgment in matters of conscience. It is that, and that only, which makes them Protestants, and distin- guishes them from the Catholic world, which asserts, on the contrary, the supreme authority of the church, of the priesthood, or of some dignitary or institution other than the Individual whose judgment and whose conscience is in question. In like manner, Democrats and Democratic governments and institutions may differ from each other, and may vary infinitely at different periods of time, and still remain Democratic, so long as they maintain the one essential principle and condi- tion of Democracy, namely, that all governmental pow- ers reside in, are only delegated by, and can be, at any moment, resumed by the people — that is, by the indi- viduals^ who are first Individuals, and who then, by virtue only of the act of delegating such powers, be- come a people , that is, a combined mass of Individuals. It is this dogma, and this alone, which makes the Dem- ocrat, and which distinguishes him from the Despotist, or the defender of the divine right of kings. Again, Socialism assumes every shade and variety of opinion respecting the modes of realizing its own aspirations, and, indeed, upon every other point, except one, which, when investigated, will be found to be the paramount rights of the Individual over social institu- tions ; and the consequent demand that all existing social institutions shall be so modified that the Individual shall be in no manner subjected to them. This, then, is the identical principle of Protestantism and Democracy carried into its application in another sphere. The 14 TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. celebrated formula of Fourier, that " destinies are pro- portioned to attractions," means, when translated into less technical phraseology, that society must be so re- organized, that every Individual shall be empowered to choose and vary his own destiny or condition and pur- suits in life, untrammeled by social restrictions ; in other words, so that every man may be a law unto him- self, paramount to all other human laws, and the sole judge for himself of the divine law and of the requisi- tions of his own individual nature and organization. This is equally the fundamental principle of all the social theories, except in the case of the Shakers, the Rappites, etc., which are based upon religious whims, demanding submission, as matter of duty, to a despotic rule, and which embody, in another form, the readoption of the popish or conservative principle. They, there- fore, while they live in a form of society similar in some respects to those which have been proposed by the various schools of Socialists, are, in fact, neither Protestants nor Democrats, and, consequently, not So- cialists in the sense in which I am now defining Social- ism. The forms of society proposed by Socialism are the mere shell of the doctrine — means to the end — a platform upon which to place the Individual, in order that he may be enabled freely to exercise his own Indi- viduality, which is the end and aim of all. We have seen that the shell is one which may be inhabited by despotism. Possibly it is unfit for the habitation of any thing else than despotism, which the Socialist hopes, by ensconcing himself therein, to escape. It is possible, even, that Socialism may have mistaken its measures altogether, and that the whole system of As- TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. 15 sociation and combined interests and combined respon- sibilities proposed by it, may be essentially antagonistic to the very ends proposed. All this, however, if it be so, is merely incidental. It belongs to the shell, and not to the substance — to the means, and not to the end. The whole programme of Socialism may yet be abandoned or reversed, and yet Socialism remain in substance the same thing. What Socialism demands, is the emancipation of the Individual from social bond- age, by whatsoever means will effect that design, in the same manner as Protestantism demands the emancipa- tion of the Individual from ecclesiastical bondage, and Democracy from political. Whosoever makes that de- mand, or labors to that end, is a Socialist. Any par- ticular views he may entertain, distinguishing him from other Socialists, regarding practical measures, or the ultimate forms of society, are the mere specific differ- ences, like those which divide the Protestant sects of Christendom. This definition of Socialism may surprise some into the discovery of the fact, that they have been Social- ists all along, unawares. Some, on the other hand, who have called themselves Socialists, may not at once be inclined to accept the definition. They may not perceive clearly that it is the emancipation of the In- dividual for which they are laboring, and affirm that it is, on the other hand, the freedom and happiness of the race. They will not, however, deny that it is both; and a very little reflection will show that the freedom and happiness of each individual will be the freedom and happiness of the race, and that the free- dom and happiness of the race can not exist so long a* 16 TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. there is any individual of the race who is not happy and free. So the Protestant and the Democrat may not always have a clear intellectual perception of the dis- tinctive principle of their creeds. He may be attached to it from an instinctive sentiment, which he has never thoroughly analyzed, or 'even from the mere accidents of education and birth. Protestantism proclaims that the Individual has an inalienable right to judge for himself in all matters of conscience. Democracy proclaims that the Individual has an inalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Socialism proclaims that the Individual has an inalienable right to that social position which his powers and natural organization qualify him, and which his tastes incline him to fill, and, consequently, to that constitution or arrangement of the property re- lations, and other relations of society, whatsoever that may be, which will enable him to enjoy and exercise that right — the adaptation of social conditions to the wants of each Individual, with all his peculiarities and fluctuations of taste, instead of the moulding of the Individual into conformity with the rigid requirements of a preconcerted social organization. If this be a correct statement of the essential nature of Protestantism, Democracy, and Socialism, then Prot- estantism, Democracy, and Socialism are not actuated by three distinct principles at all. They are simply three partial announcements of one generic principle, which lies beneath all these movements, and of which they are the legitimate outgrowths or developments, modified only by the fact of a different application of the same principle. This great generic principle, which TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. 17 underlies every manifestation of that universal unrest and revolution, which is known technically in this age as " Progress," is nothing more nor less than " The Sovereignty of the Individual." It is that which is the central idea and vital principle of Protestantism ; it is that which is the central idea and vital principle of Democracy ; and it is that which is the central idea and vital principle of Socialism. This being so, it is high time that the mutual affinity of these movements should be intelligently perceived and recognized both by the friends and the enemies of the movements themselves. It is high time that the scene of the battle-field should be shifted from the right or wrong of any or all of the partial developments of the principle to the essential right or wrong of the principle itself. The true issue is not whether Prot- estantism be good or evil, whether Democracy be good or evil, nor whether Socialism be good or evil, but whether the naked, bald, unlimited principle of the Sovereignty of the Individual, in human government and the administration of human affairs, be essentially good and true or essentially pernicious and false. This is the issue now up for trial before the world, and the definitive decision of which must be had before the final destiny of mankind upon earth can be even rough- hewn by the most vivid imagination, and certainly be- fore any thing approximating scientific deduction re- specting it can be had. You will please to consider yourselves, Ladies and Gentlemen, as a jury empannelled to try this issue. I take my position before you as the advocate of the Sovereignty of the Individual, and the defender of the 18 TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. spirit of the present age. If this principle be essen- tially good and true, then it may be trusted wherever it leads, and the general drift of what the world calls " Progress" is in the right direction, whatever mistakes may be made in matters of detail. If it is a false principle, the sooner we understand that fact the bet- ter ; but let it be also understood in that case, that we have much to undo which has been already done, and which has been supposed to be well done, in these mod- ern times. In that case, Protestantism is all wrong, and Democracy is all wrong ; the Whateleys, the Wise- mans, the Bronsons, the Windischgratzes, and the Hay- naus are philosophers and philanthropists of the right school ; and the Luthers, the Channings, the Jeffersons, the Washingtons, and the Kossuths are the world's worst foes — the betrayers and scourgers which the wrath of an offended Heaven has let loose upon earth, first to delude, and then to punish mankind for their sins. I will first endeavor to set before you a clearer view of the doctrine of the Sovereignty of the Individual, as based upon the principle of the infinite Individuality of things. I will then show that this Sovereignty of the Individual furnishes the law of the development of human society, as illustrated in the progressive move- ments of modern times. Finally, I shall endeavor to trace the development which is hereafter to result from the further operation of this principle, and to fix, so nearly as may be, the condition of human affairs to- ward which it conducts, especially in that particular department of human affairs which constitutes the sub- ject of investigation this evening, namely, the govern- ment of mankind. TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. 19 The doctrine of the Sovereignty of the Individual — in one sense itself a principle — grows out of the still more fundamental principle of " Individuality, " which pervades universal nature. Individuality is positively the most fundamental and universal princi- ple which the finite mind seems capable of discovering, and the best image of the Infinite. There are no two objects in the universe which are precisely alike. Each has its own constitution and peculiarities, which distin- guish it from every other. Infinite diversity is the universal law. In the multitude of human counte- nances, for example, there are no two alike, and in the multitude of human characters there is the same vari- ety. The hour which your courtesy has assigned to me would be entirely consumed, if I were to attempt to ad- duce a thousandth part of the illustrations of this subtile principle of Individuality, which lie patent upon the face of nature, all around me. It applies equally to persons, to things, and to events. There have been no two occurrences which were precisely alike during all the cycling periods of time. No action, transaction, or set of circumstances whatsoever ever corresponded precisely to any other action, transaction, or set of cir- cumstances. Had I a precise knowledge- of all the oc- currences which have ever taken place up to this hour, it would not suffice to enable me to make a law which would be applicable in all respects to the very next oc- currence which shall take place, nor to any one of the infinite millions of events which shall hereafter occur. This diversity reigns throughout every kingdom of na- ture, and mocks at all human attempts to make laws, or constitutions, or regulations, or governmental insti- 20 TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. tutions of any sort, which shall work justly and har- moniously amidst the unforeseen contingencies of the future. ' The individualities of objects are least, or, at all events, they are less apparent, when the objects are inorganic or of a low grade of organization. The in- dividualities of the grains of sand which compose the beach, for example, are less marked than those of veg- etables, and those of vegetables are less than those of animals, and, finally, those of animals are less than those of man. In proportion as an object is more complex, it embodies a greater number of elements, and each element has its own individualities, or diversities, in every new combination into which it enters. Conse- quently these diversities are multiplied into each other, in the infinite augmentation of geometrical progression. Man, standing, then, at the head of the created uni- verse, is consequently the most complex creature in existence — every individual man or woman being a lit- tle world in him or herself, an image or reflection of God, an epitome of the Infinite. Hence the individual- ities of such a being are utterly immeasurable, and every attempt to adjust the capacities, the adaptations, the wants, or the responsibilities of one human being by the capacities, the adaptations, the wants, or the re- sponsibilities of another human being, except in the very broadest generalities, is unqualifiedly futile and hopeless. Hence every ecclesiastical, governmental, or social institution which is based on the idea of demand- ing conformity or likeness in any thing, has ever been, and ever will be, frustrated by the operation of this sub- tile, all-pervading principle of Individuality. Hence hu- TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. 21 man society has ever been and is still in the turmoil of revolution. The only alternative known has been between revolution and despotism. Revolutions violently burst the bonds, and explode the foundations of existing insti- tutions. The institution falls before the Individual. Des- potism only succeeds by denaturalizing mankind. It extin^ guishes their individualities only by extinguishing them. The Individual falls before the institution. Judge ye which is best, the man-made or the God-made thing. In the next place this Individuality is inherent and unconquerable, except, as I have just said, by extin- guishing the man himself. The man himself has no power over it. He can not divest himself of his organic peculiarities of character, any more than he can divest himself of his features. It attends him even in the effort he makes, if he makes any, to divest himself of it. He may as well attempt to flee his own shadow, as to rid himself of the indefeasible, God-given inheritance of his own Individuality. Finally, this indestructible and all-pervading Individ- uality furnishes, itself, the law, and the only true law, of order and harmony. Goverments have hitherto been established, and have apologized for the unseemly fact of their existence, from the necessity of establishing and maintaining order ; but order has never yet been maintained, revolutions and violent outbreaks have never yet been ended, public peace and harmony have never yet been secured, for the precise reason that the organic, essential, and indestructible natures of the objects which it was attempted to reduce to order have always been constricted and infringed by every such attempt. Just in proportion as the effort is less and 22 TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. less made to reduce men to order, just in that propor- tion they become more orderly, as witness the difference in the state of society in Austria and the United States. Plant an army of one hundred thousand soldiers in New York, as at Paris, to preserve the peace, and we should have a bloody revolution in a week ; and be assured that the only remedy for what little of turbulence remains among us, as compared with European societies, will be found to be more liberty. When there remain positively no external restrictions, there will be positively no dis- turbance, provided always certain regulating principles of justice, to which I shall advert presently, are ac- cepted and enter into the public mind, serving as sub- stitutes for every species of repressive laws. I was saying that Individuality is the essential law of order. This is true throughout the universe. When every individual particle of matter obeys the law of its own attraction, and comes into that precise position, and moves in that precise direction which its own inher- ent individualities demand, the harmony of the spheres is evolved. By that means only natural. classification, natural order, natural organization, natural harmony and agreement is attained. Every scheme or arrange- ment which is based upon the principle of thwarting the inherent affinities of the individual monads which compose any system or organism is essentially vicious, and the organization is false — a mere bundle of revolu- tionary and antagonistic atoms. It is time that human system builders should begin to discover this universal truth. The principle is self-evident. Objects bound together contrary to their nature, must and will seek to rectify themselves by breaking the bonds which confine TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. 23 them, while those which come together by their own affinities remain quiescent and content. Let human system makers of all sorts, then, admit the principle of an infinite Individuality among men, which can not be suppressed, and which must be indulged and fostered, at all events, as one element in the solution of the prob- lem they have before them. If they are unable to see clearly how all external restrictions can be removed with safety to the well-being of society, let them, never- theless, not abandon a principle which is self-evident, but let them modestly suspect that there may be some other elements in the solution of the same problem, which their sagacity has not yet enabled them to dis- cover. In all events, and at all hazards, this Individ- uality of every member of the human family must be recognized and indulged, because first, as we have seen, it is infinite, and can not be measured or prescribed for ; then, because it is inherent, and can not be conquered ; and, finally, because it is the essential element of order, and can not, consequently, be infringed without engen- dering infinite confusion, such as has hitherto universally reigned, in the administration of human affairs. If, now, Individuality is a universal law which must be obeyed if we would have order and harmony in any sphere, and, consequently, if we would have a true con- stitution of human government, then the absolute Sov- ereignty of the Individual necessarily results. The monads or atoms of which human society is composed are the individual men and women in it. They must be so disposed of, as we have seen, in order that society may be harmonic, that the destiny of each shall be controlled by his or her own individualities of taste, 24 TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. conscience, intellect, capacities, and will. But man is a being endowed with consciousness. He, and no one else, knows the determining force of his own attractions. No one else can therefore decide for him, and hence Individuality can only become the law of human action by securing to each individual the sovereign determina- tion of his own judgment and of his own conduct, in all things, with no right reserved either of punishment or censure on the part of any body else whomsoever ; and this is what is meant by the Sovereignty of the Indi- vidual, limited only by the ever-accompanying condition, resulting from the equal Sovereignty of all others, that the onerous consequences of his actions be assumed by himself. If my audience were composed chiefly of Catholics, or Monarchists, or Anti-Progressionists of any sort, I should develop this argument more at length, for as I have said, it is the real issue, and the only real issue between the reformatory and the conservative portions of mankind ; but I suppose that I may, with propriety, assume that I am before an auditory who are in the main Protestant and Democratic, and assuming that, I shall then be authorized to assume, in accordance with the principles I have endeavored to develop, that they are likewise substantially Socialist, according to the definition I have given to Socialism, whether they have hitherto accepted or repudiated the name. It is enough, however, if I address you as Protestants and Democrats, or as either of these. I shall therefore as- sume, without further dwelling upon the fundamental statement of those principles, that you are ready to admit so much of Individuality and of the Sovereignty TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. 25 of the Individual as is necessarily involved in the pro- positions of Protestantism or Democracy. I shall as- sume that I am before an assembly of men and women who sympathize with ecclesiastical and political en- franchisement — who believe that what the world calls Progress, in these modern times, is in the main real and not sham progress, a genuine and legitimate develop- ment of the race. Instead, therefore, of pursuing the main argument further, I will return to, and endeavor more fully to establish, a position which I have already assumed, namely, that by virtue of the fact of being either a Protestant or a Democrat, you have admitted away the whole case, and that you are fully committed to the whole doctrine of Individuality and the Sover- eignty of the Individual, wherever that may lead. I assert, then, the doctrine of Individuality, in its broadest and most unlimited sense. I assert that the law of genuine progress in human affairs is identical with the tendency to individualize. In ecclesiastical affairs it is the breaking up of the Church into sects, the breaking up of the larger sects into minor sects, the breaking up of the minor sectf>, by continual schism, into still minuter fragments of sects, and, finally, a complete disintegration of the whole mass into individuals, at which point every human being becomes his own sect and his own church. Does it require any demonstra- tion that this is the natural tendency and the legitimate development of Protestantism, that it is in fact the ne- cessary and inevitable outgrowth of its own fundament- al principle. The History of all Religions in Protest- ant Christendom is becoming already too voluminous to be written. With the multiplication of sects grows the 26 TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. spirit of toleration, which is nothing else but the recog- nition of the sovereignty of others. A glance at the actual condition of the Protestant Church demonstrates the tendency to the obliteration of Sectarianism by the very superabundance of sects. In the political sphere the individualizing tendency of Democracy is exhibited in the distribution of the departments of government into the hands of different depositaries of power, the discrimination of the chief functions of government into the Legislature, the Exec- utive, and the Judiciary, in the division of the Legis- lature into distinct branches, in the representative sys- tem which recognizes the Individuality of different con- federated states, and of different portions of the same state, in the divorce of the Church and State, and yet more strikingly than all, in the successive surrender to the Individual of one branch after another of what was formerly regarded as the legitimate business of gov- ernment. Under the old order of things, government interfered to determine the trade or occupation of the Individual, to settle his religious faith, to regulate his locomotion, to prescribe his hours of relaxation and retirement, the length of his beard, the cut of his apparel, his relative rank, the mode of his social intercourse, and so on con- tinuously, until government was in fact every thing, and the Individual nothing. Democracy, working somewhat blindly, it is true, but yet guided by a true instinct, begotten by its own great indwelling vital principle, the Sovereignty of the Individual, has already substantially revolutionized all that. It has swept away, for the most part, in America at least, the impertinent inter- TRUE CONSTITUTION OF GOVERNMENT. 27 ference of government with the pursuits, the religious opinions and ceremonies, the travel, the amusements, the dress, and the manners of the citizen. One whole third of the field heretofore occupied by government has thus been surrendered to the Individual. To this point we have already attained, practically, at the pre- cise stage at which we now are in the transition from the past to the future model of the organization of society. But the principle of Democracy does not stop here. 