wget Vs urlretrieve of python
Since python suggests using urllib2 instead of urllib, I take a test between urllib2.urlopen and wget.
The result is, it takes nearly the same time for both of them to download the same file.Sometimes, urllib2 performs even better. 
The advantage of wget lies in a dynamic progress bar to show the percent finished and the current download speed when transferring.
The file size in my test is 5MB.I haven't used any cache module in python and I am not aware of how wget works when downloading big size file.
I have a task to download Gbs of data from a website. The data is in form of .gz files, each file being 45mb in size.
The easy way to get the files is use "wget -r -np -A files url". This will donwload data in a recursive format and mirrors the website. The donwload rate is very high 4mb/sec.
But, just to play around I was also using python to build my urlparser.
Downloading via Python's urlretrieve is damm slow, possible 4 times as slow as wget. The download rate is 500kb/sec. I use HTMLParser for parsing the href tags.
I am not sure why is this happening. Are there any settings for this.
Thanks