--- license: apache-2.0 dataset_info: features: - name: image dtype: image - name: prompt dtype: string - name: word_scores dtype: string - name: alignment_score dtype: float32 - name: coherence_score dtype: float32 - name: style_score dtype: float32 - name: alignment_heatmap sequence: sequence: float16 - name: coherence_heatmap sequence: sequence: float16 splits: - name: train num_bytes: 13690247160.8 num_examples: 6550 download_size: 9033856469 dataset_size: 13690247160.8 configs: - config_name: default data_files: - split: train path: data/train-* --- Building upon Google's research [Rich Human Feedback for Text-to-Image Generation](https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10240) we have collected over 1.5 million human responses using our [Python API](https://docs.rapidata.ai/) # Overview We asked humans to evaluate AI-generated images. For images that contained flaws, participants were asked to identify specific problematic areas. Additionally, for all images, participants identified words from the prompts that were not accurately represented in the generated images. # Word Scores Users identified words from the prompts that were NOT accurately depicted in the generated images. Higher word scores indicate poorer representation in the image. Participants also had the option to select "[No_mistakes]" for prompts where all elements were accurately depicted. ### Examples Results: | | | |---|---| | | | # Alignment The alignment score quantifies how well an image matches its prompt. Users were asked: "How well does the image match the description?" The final score is calculated on a scale of 1-5 by aggregating 21 responses. For images with an alignment score below 3.2, additional users were asked to highlight areas where the image did not align with the prompt. These responses were then compiled into a heatmap. ### Example Results: