jasoncorkill commited on
Commit
eda0d86
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): b6c6aa3

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +15 -1
README.md CHANGED
@@ -31,6 +31,20 @@ configs:
31
  data_files:
32
  - split: train
33
  path: data/train-*
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
34
  ---
35
  <a href="https://www.rapidata.ai">
36
  <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/66f5624c42b853e73e0738eb/jfxR79bOztqaC6_yNNnGU.jpeg" width="250" alt="Rapidata Logo">
@@ -145,4 +159,4 @@ Images scoring below 3.8 in coherence were further evaluated, with participants
145
  | <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/672b7d79fd1e92e3c3567435/mRDdoQdc4_iy2JcLhdI7J.png" width="500"> | <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/672b7d79fd1e92e3c3567435/2N2KJyz4YOGT6N6tuUX8M.png" width="500"> |
146
 
147
  # Style
148
- The style score reflects how visually appealing participants found each image, independent of the prompt. Users were asked: "How much do you like the way this image looks?" Each image received 21 responses, which were aggregated on a scale of 1-5.
 
31
  data_files:
32
  - split: train
33
  path: data/train-*
34
+ task_categories:
35
+ - text-to-image
36
+ - text-classification
37
+ - image-classification
38
+ - image-to-text
39
+ - image-segmentation
40
+ language:
41
+ - en
42
+ tags:
43
+ - t2i
44
+ - preferences
45
+ pretty_name: Rich Human Feedback for Text to Image Models
46
+ size_categories:
47
+ - 1M<n<10M
48
  ---
49
  <a href="https://www.rapidata.ai">
50
  <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/66f5624c42b853e73e0738eb/jfxR79bOztqaC6_yNNnGU.jpeg" width="250" alt="Rapidata Logo">
 
159
  | <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/672b7d79fd1e92e3c3567435/mRDdoQdc4_iy2JcLhdI7J.png" width="500"> | <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/672b7d79fd1e92e3c3567435/2N2KJyz4YOGT6N6tuUX8M.png" width="500"> |
160
 
161
  # Style
162
+ The style score reflects how visually appealing participants found each image, independent of the prompt. Users were asked: "How much do you like the way this image looks?" Each image received 21 responses, which were aggregated on a scale of 1-5.