jasoncorkill commited on
Commit
0e1ebcf
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 8159d87

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +15 -13
README.md CHANGED
@@ -60,10 +60,10 @@ size_categories:
60
  <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/66f5624c42b853e73e0738eb/jfxR79bOztqaC6_yNNnGU.jpeg" width="250" alt="Rapidata Logo">
61
  </a>
62
 
63
- Building upon Google's research [Rich Human Feedback for Text-to-Image Generation](https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10240) we have collected over 1.5 million human responses using our [Python API](https://docs.rapidata.ai/)
64
 
65
  # Overview
66
- We asked humans to evaluate AI-generated images. For images that contained flaws, participants were asked to identify specific problematic areas. Additionally, for all images, participants identified words from the prompts that were not accurately represented in the generated images.
67
 
68
  # Word Scores
69
  Users identified words from the prompts that were NOT accurately depicted in the generated images. Higher word scores indicate poorer representation in the image. Participants also had the option to select "[No_mistakes]" for prompts where all elements were accurately depicted.
@@ -73,6 +73,19 @@ Users identified words from the prompts that were NOT accurately depicted in the
73
  |---|---|
74
  | <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/672b7d79fd1e92e3c3567435/4uWKVjZBA5aX2YDUYNpdV.png" width="500"> | <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/672b7d79fd1e92e3c3567435/f9JIuwDoNohy7EkDYILFm.png" width="500"> |
75
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
76
  # Alignment
77
  The alignment score quantifies how well an image matches its prompt. Users were asked: "How well does the image match the description?" The final score is calculated on a scale of 1-5 by aggregating 21 responses.
78
 
@@ -157,16 +170,5 @@ For images with an alignment score below 3.2, additional users were asked to hig
157
  </div>
158
 
159
 
160
- # Coherence
161
- The coherence score measures whether the generated image is logically consistent and free from artifacts or visual glitches. Without seeing the original prompt, users were asked: "Look closely, does this image have weird errors, like senseless or malformed objects, incomprehensible details, or visual glitches?" Each image received 21 responses, which were aggregated on a scale of 1-5.
162
-
163
- Images scoring below 3.8 in coherence were further evaluated, with participants marking specific errors in the image.
164
-
165
- ### Example Results:
166
-
167
- | <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/672b7d79fd1e92e3c3567435/sc-4ls9X0yO-hGN0VCDSX.png" width="500"> | <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/672b7d79fd1e92e3c3567435/J77EmYp4oyRRakkcRnaF9.png" width="500"> |
168
- |---|---|
169
- | <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/672b7d79fd1e92e3c3567435/mRDdoQdc4_iy2JcLhdI7J.png" width="500"> | <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/672b7d79fd1e92e3c3567435/2N2KJyz4YOGT6N6tuUX8M.png" width="500"> |
170
-
171
  # Style
172
  The style score reflects how visually appealing participants found each image, independent of the prompt. Users were asked: "How much do you like the way this image looks?" Each image received 21 responses, which were aggregated on a scale of 1-5.
 
60
  <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/66f5624c42b853e73e0738eb/jfxR79bOztqaC6_yNNnGU.jpeg" width="250" alt="Rapidata Logo">
61
  </a>
62
 
63
+ Building upon Google's research [Rich Human Feedback for Text-to-Image Generation](https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10240) we have collected over 1.5 million responses from 152'684 individual humans using Rapidata via the [Python API](https://docs.rapidata.ai/)
64
 
65
  # Overview
66
+ We asked humans to evaluate AI-generated images in style, coherence and prompt alignment. For images that contained flaws, participants were asked to identify specific problematic areas. Additionally, for all images, participants identified words from the prompts that were not accurately represented in the generated images.
67
 
68
  # Word Scores
69
  Users identified words from the prompts that were NOT accurately depicted in the generated images. Higher word scores indicate poorer representation in the image. Participants also had the option to select "[No_mistakes]" for prompts where all elements were accurately depicted.
 
73
  |---|---|
74
  | <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/672b7d79fd1e92e3c3567435/4uWKVjZBA5aX2YDUYNpdV.png" width="500"> | <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/672b7d79fd1e92e3c3567435/f9JIuwDoNohy7EkDYILFm.png" width="500"> |
75
 
76
+
77
+ # Coherence
78
+ The coherence score measures whether the generated image is logically consistent and free from artifacts or visual glitches. Without seeing the original prompt, users were asked: "Look closely, does this image have weird errors, like senseless or malformed objects, incomprehensible details, or visual glitches?" Each image received 21 responses, which were aggregated on a scale of 1-5.
79
+
80
+ Images scoring below 3.8 in coherence were further evaluated, with participants marking specific errors in the image.
81
+
82
+ ### Example Results:
83
+
84
+ | <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/672b7d79fd1e92e3c3567435/sc-4ls9X0yO-hGN0VCDSX.png" width="500"> | <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/672b7d79fd1e92e3c3567435/J77EmYp4oyRRakkcRnaF9.png" width="500"> |
85
+ |---|---|
86
+ | <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/672b7d79fd1e92e3c3567435/mRDdoQdc4_iy2JcLhdI7J.png" width="500"> | <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/672b7d79fd1e92e3c3567435/2N2KJyz4YOGT6N6tuUX8M.png" width="500"> |
87
+
88
+
89
  # Alignment
90
  The alignment score quantifies how well an image matches its prompt. Users were asked: "How well does the image match the description?" The final score is calculated on a scale of 1-5 by aggregating 21 responses.
91
 
 
170
  </div>
171
 
172
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
173
  # Style
174
  The style score reflects how visually appealing participants found each image, independent of the prompt. Users were asked: "How much do you like the way this image looks?" Each image received 21 responses, which were aggregated on a scale of 1-5.