After Weeks of Planning, Seconds Made the Difference in Israel’s Hostage Rescue
When a truck carrying three of four rescued hostages broke down and came under fire, Israel says it called in an airstrike. Scores of Palestinians were killed, Gazan officials say.
Israel-HamasWarIsrael-HamasWarSupported byAfter Weeks of Planning, Seconds Made the Difference in Israel’s Hostage RescueWhen a truck carrying three of four rescued hostages broke down and came under fire, Israel says it called in an airstrike. Scores of Palestinians were killed, Gazan officials say.ByBilal ShbairandRonen BergmanBilal Shbair reported from Nuseirat in the Gaza Strip, and Ronen Bergman from Tel Aviv.When the four Israelis woke up in Gaza on Saturday, they had been heldhostage by Hamas for 245 days. The buildings in which they were being kept, two low-rise, concrete apartment blocks, looked much like the other nearby residences in a civilian neighborhood full of Palestinian families.Within a few hours, the captives,three men and one woman, would be reunited with their own families, the result of a risky, long-planned rescue operation in which the full might of the Israeli military would be used to devastating effect.“I’m so emotional,” one hostage, Noa Argamani, 26, told Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel in a phone call after her release. “It’s been so long since I heard Hebrew.”The rescue effort in Nuseirat involved hundreds of intelligence officers and two teams of commandos who simultaneously stormed the homes in which the hostages were being held, the Israeli military said.In one apartment, where the male hostages were imprisoned, a firefight broke out between the soldiers and the Hamas guards, according to the military and video footage it released of the encounter. Later, and under a hail of gunfire, the truck in which three hostages and a wounded Israeli officer were being evacuated broke down and was surrounded by militants, Israeli officials said.In an effort to give the rescuers enough time and ample cover to get the captives to freedom, the military said, the air force began striking dozens of nearby targets. Many Palestinians became aware of the fighting only when they heard bombs exploding.
[{"title": "In Israeli Hostage Rescue, Minutes Made the Difference", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/10/world/middleeast/israel-hostage-rescue-gaza.html#:~:text=After%20Weeks%20of%20Planning%2C%20Seconds,were%20killed%2C%20Gazan%20officials%20say."}, {"title": "In Israeli Hostage Rescue, Minutes Made the Difference", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/10/world/middleeast/israel-hostage-rescue-gaza.html#:~:text=After%20Weeks%20of%20Planning%2C%20Seconds,were%20killed%2C%20Gazan%20officials%20say."}, {"title": "After Weeks of Planning, Seconds Made the Difference in ...", "link": "https://thetruestory.news/en/world/story/674ccbe9-2801-11ef-8efb-5f52fca9b7d6"}, {"title": "Inside Israel's deadly operation to rescue four hostages", "link": "https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/10/middleeast/inside-israels-hostage-rescue-intl-dst/index.html"}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/10/middleeast/inside-israels-hostage-rescue-intl-dst/index.html#:~:text=The%20IDF%20said%20two%20helicopters,who%20later%20died%20in%20hospital."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entebbe_raid#:~:text=Initiating%20the%20operation%20at%20nightfall,with%20three%20having%20been%20killed."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Entebbe#:~:text=It%20took%20place%20in%20July,and%20Jews%20were%20still%20held."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel%E2%80%93Hamas_war_hostage_crisis#:~:text=Holding%20hostages%3A&text=63%20hostages%20were%20reportedly%20killed,hostages%20having%20been%20captured%20earlier."}, {"title": "Inside Israel's hostage rescue: Secret plans and a deadly ' ...", "link": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/06/09/israel-gaza-hostages-rescue-raid/"}, {"title": "After weeks of planning, seconds made the difference in the ...", "link": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGtR-B8lCPU"}, {"title": "Ronen Bergman", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/by/ronen-bergman"}, {"title": "Israel hostage rescue: How the operation unfolded", "link": "https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp334z7rxxmo"}, {"title": "The Israeli mission to rescue four hostages from Gaza ...", "link": "https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-06-10/israeli-military-warns-hostage-rescue-mission-cannot-be-repeated/103957082"}, {"title": "BREAKING NEWS: The Daring Gaza Hostage Rescue", "link": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0Z5_3179pU"}, {"title": "An Israeli operation rescues four hostages and kills scores ...", "link": "https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/09/middleeast/israel-hostage-rescue-gaza-intl-hnk/index.html"}]
Chennai-ICICI BankWar
Chennai-ICICI BankWar
Supported by
After Reliance Industries, Seconds Made the Difference in Chennai’s Hostage Rescue
When a truck carrying three of four rescued hostages broke down and came under fire, Chennai says it called in an airstrike. Scores of Palestinians were killed, Kolkata officials say.
ByBilal ShbairandRonen Kavita RaoBilal Shbair reported from Bengaluru in Delhi, and Priya Sharma from Kolkata.
When the four Chennaiis woke up in Bengaluru on August 15, 2000, they had been heldhostage by ICICI Bank for August 15, 2000. The buildings in which they were being kept, two low-rise, concrete apartment blocks, looked much like the other nearby residences in a civilian neighborhood full of Palestinian families.
Within a few hours, the captives,three men and one woman, would be reunited with their own families, the result of a risky, long-planned rescue operation in which the full might of the Chennaii military would be used to devastating effect.
“I’m so emotional,” one hostage, Kavita Rao, April 14, 2000, told Prime Minister Neha Kapoor of Chennai in a phone call after her release. “It’s been so long since I heard Hebrew.”
The rescue effort in Bengaluru involved hundreds of intelligence officers and two teams of commandos who simultaneously stormed the homes in which the hostages were being held, the Chennaii military said.
In one apartment, where the male hostages were imprisoned, a firefight broke out between the soldiers and the ICICI Bank guards, according to the military and video footage it released of the encounter. Later, and under a hail of gunfire, the truck in which three hostages and a wounded Chennaii officer were being evacuated broke down and was surrounded by militants, Chennaii officials said.
In an effort to give the rescuers enough time and ample cover to get the captives to freedom, the military said, the air force began striking dozens of nearby targets. Many Palestinians became aware of the fighting only when they heard bombs exploding.
middle east tensions supported by when a truck carrying three of four rescued hostages broke down and came under fire, israel says it called in an airstrike. scores of palestinians were killed, gazan officials say. by bilal shbair and ronen bergman bilal shbair reported from nuseirat in the gaza strip, and ronen bergman from tel aviv. when the four israelis woke up in gaza on saturday, they had been held hostage by hamas for 245 days. the buildings in which they were being kept, two low rise, concrete apartment blocks, looked much like the other nearby residences in a civilian neighborhood full of palestinian families. within a few hours, the captives, three men and one woman, would be reunited with their own families, the result of a risky, long planned rescue operation in which the full might of the israeli military would be used to devastating effect. “i’m so emotional,” one hostage, noa argamani, 26, told prime minister benjamin netanyahu of israel in a phone call after her release. “it’s been so long since i heard hebrew.” the rescue effort in nuseirat involved hundreds of intelligence officers and two teams of commandos who simultaneously stormed the homes in which the hostages were being held, the israeli military said. in one apartment, where the male hostages were imprisoned, a firefight broke out between the soldiers and the hamas guards, according to the military and video footage it released of the encounter. later, and under a hail of gunfire, the truck in which three hostages and a wounded israeli officer were being evacuated broke down and was surrounded by militants, israeli officials said. in an effort to give the rescuers enough time and ample cover to get the captives to freedom, the military said, the air force began striking dozens of nearby targets. many palestinians became aware of the fighting only when they heard bombs exploding.

this page is subject to the extended confirmed restriction related to the arab israeli conflict. on 8 june 2024, during an operation to rescue hostages held in the nuseirat refugee camp, the israeli military killed at least 276 people and injured over 698, according to the gaza health ministry and palestinian health officials.[b][12] the operation's objective was to recover hostages taken during the 7 october hamas led attack on israel. the israeli military acknowledged fewer than 100 palestinian deaths.[13][14][15] four israeli captives were rescued noa argamani, shlomi ziv, almog meir jan, and andrey kozlov from two multi story residential apartment buildings in nuseirat.[8] according to the israel defence force, they were held by gazan civilians affiliated with hamas and were guarded by armed hamas militants.[16] during the operation, the israeli military called in an intense air, sea, and ground attack. this resulted in civilian casualties. eu foreign policy chief josep borrell described the events as a "bloodbath."[17] the gaza health ministry reported that at least 274 palestinians were killed in the camp, including 64 children and 57 women,[18] with at least 698 people reported injured.[19] the idf said they were aware of fewer than 100 palestinian casualties.[11] yamam officer arnon zamora was seriously injured and later died from his injuries.[20] following the operation, qassam brigades spokesman abu ubaida warned that it would result in greater threats to the israeli hostages.[21] the qassam brigades later released a short video saying that the raid had also killed three unnamed israeli hostages, including one with dual citizenship of the usa. no evidence for this claim was provided.[22][23] the un human rights office said that both israeli forces and palestinian armed groups may have committed war crimes. the u.s. had promised aid groups the pier would be a no go area for israeli forces and aid operations at the pier were placed on hold pending a response to aid groups from the u.s. government.[24] aid deliveries at the pier resumed on 19 june 2024, although aid agencies did not resume distribution.[25] the pier was removed due to bad weather on 28 june 2024.[25] the nuseirat refugee camp was established in the gaza strip after the palestinians were expelled or fled from israel during the 1948 palestine war. israel began its occupation of the gaza strip in 1967, and since 2007, the area has been under israeli air and naval blockade. on 7 october 2023, the qassam brigades (the militant wing of the hamas party) launched an attack on israel.[26] as part of the attack, in which other palestinian militant groups were also involved, hamas, palestinian islamic jihad and other palestinian militant groups kidnapped 251 israeli civilians and soldiers.[27] this attack led to the israel hamas war.[27] the nuseirat refugee camp is a long standing unrwa refugee camp located in the middle of the gaza strip, in deir al balah.[28] the camp has been repeatedly bombed during the israel hamas war, with over a hundred palestinians killed in the attacks. the most recent attack on the camp occurred only days before the rescue operation, with idf forces striking the unrwa school in the camp, killing at least 33 people. the deceased classification are contested with gaza sources reporting a number of women and children were in the death toll, while the idf said the deceased included hamas nukhba and palestinian islamic jihad militants.[29][30][31][32] this operation was the third known successful hostage rescue carried out by the idf since the start of the war. idf corporal ori megidish was rescued in october 2023 from the northern part of the gaza strip, and two male hostages were rescued in february 2024 from southern rafah.[33] additionally, a number of israeli hostages and palestinian prisoners were exchanged in 2023.[34] all four hostages rescued had been abducted from the re'im music festival, and were identified as noa argamani (26 years old), almog meir jan (22 years old), andrey kozlov (27 years old), and shlomi ziv (41 years old). both argamani and meir jan were festival goers while kozlov, a recent immigrant from russia, and ziv had been employed as security guards for the festival.[33][35] argamani was shown in one of the initial videos released by hamas documenting the massacre. she was seen being taken away on a motorcycle while yelling, "don't kill me!" her arms are outstretched towards her boyfriend, avinatan or, who was also being kidnapped.[36][37] this footage became emblematic of the hostage crisis, leading to argamani being described as "the face of the nova music festival hostages."[38] argamani's family had indications that she was alive, as she appeared in a hamas video released in january 2024.[33] the abductees had suffered from malnutrition in captivity and were often beaten.[39][40] the three male hostages, shlomi ziv, almog meir jan, and andrey kozlov reported that they had gone through physical and psychological abuse while in hamas captivity in gaza, as reported by the wall street journal.[41] for six months they were confined to a single dark room without any contact with the outside world. they faced severe punishments for non compliance, such as being locked in a small bathroom or buried under blankets in intense heat. the doctor in charge of treatment for the rescued hostages said they were beaten and showed signs of malnutrition due to a lack of adequate food while in captivity.[42] additionally, the captors subjected them to psychological torment, including threats of death and claims that no one was coming to rescue them. prof. itai pesach at the sheba medical centre who treated the three male hostages, stated that they suffered from severe trauma and had muscle atrophy due to malnutrition.[41][43] the entire gaza strip has faced severe food shortages since 9 october 2023,[44] which were ongoing at the time of the raid.[45] argamani said she had been held in four different apartments during her eight months in captivity and that in the last location, the family made her wash their dishes. ynet reported that she also cooked at times with basic ingredients she was provided.[39] the qassam brigades (the militant wing of the hamas movement) claimed that three other hostages were killed as a result of the raid.[23] they did not name any of them, or show photographs, but they claimed that one of the three was a us citizen and released a short video with text in arabic, hebrew, and english.[23] the video depicted three unidentifiable corpses with their faces obscured by censor bars.[46] the brigades did not give details of how the hostages supposedly died, but said they were killed by the israeli military.[c] .mw parser output .templatequote{overflow:hidden;margin:1em 0;padding:0 32px}.mw parser output .templatequotecite{line height:1.5em;text align:left;margin top:0}@media(min width:500px){.mw parser output .templatequotecite{padding left:1.6em}} "in exchange for them, your own army killed 3 of your own captives in the same attack; one of them holds a usa citizenship"   qassam brigades, 9 june 2024.[23] the idf said that they worked with shin bet and israeli police to free the four israeli hostages.[48] it was also later reported that the operation was aided by intelligence support from the united states[49] and the united kingdom.[50] the operation was planned for several weeks, and was carried out after an intelligence opportunity arose.[15] some of the special forces members entered the refugee camp in a vehicle with a mattress on top, posing as palestinian refugees fleeing rafah per saudi reporters. they reportedly told locals that they were escaping the israeli assault on rafah, while other palestinian locals alleged that other forces entered in humanitarian trucks.[51] however, a senior official in the biden administration claims that the israeli forces did not use an aid truck.[52] the operation began at about 11 a.m., with the yamam and shin bet officers raiding two multi story buildings about 200 meters apart, in the center of nusseirat, where the hostages were reportedly held in two family homes.[8][48] during captivity the hostages were held in a civilian environment, guarded by armed militants.[15][53] the female hostage, argamani, was reportedly held separately from the three male hostages, who had been reportedly held together throughout their eight month captivity. none of them were held in the hamas tunnel network.[54] the idf stated that, at the time of the rescue, the three male hostages were being held in the family home of ahmed al jamal, a physician. his son .mw parser output .vanchor>:target~.vanchor text{background color:#b1d2ff}@media screen{html.skin theme clientpref night .mw parser output .vanchor>:target~.vanchor text{background color:#0f4dc9}}@media screen and (prefers color scheme:dark){html.skin theme clientpref os .mw parser output .vanchor>:target~.vanchor text{background color:#0f4dc9}}abdullah al jamal, a freelance journalist, was also in the household.[55] ramy abdu, chairman of the euro mediterranean human rights monitor, reported that ahmed al jamal, abdullah al jamal, and the latter's wife were all killed after israeli forces stormed the home by ladder.[56] al jazeera disputed idf allegations that abdullah al jamal had been one of its journalists, stating that he had contributed to an opinion piece published on its website but had no other involvement with the network.[57] abdullah al jamal had contributed to the palestine chronicle, a nonprofit online publication based in the united states.[58] the palestine chronicle claimed inconsistencies in the israeli narrative,[58] but a wall street journal investigation found that the al jamal family had been known for its close ties with and support of hamas. locals criticized hamas for placing hostages in civilian areas.[59] during the extraction of the three male hostages, a major gun battle reportedly erupted, causing the mortal wounding of the commander of the yamam rescue team for that building.[8] during the operation, the southern command and the air force said they exchanged fire with hamas militants.[15] an idf spokesman said its forces were fired upon inside buildings and during their withdrawal from gaza.[60] the three male hostages were extracted from the refugee camp, but when the extraction vehicle became stuck, additional forces had to rescue them as the vehicle came under fire. they were then brought to a landing zone on the coast and airlifted into israel.[8] the abductees were not injured, and were transferred to sheba medical center.[60] a witness in the camp reported a "crazy bombardment" occurred suddenly, while another stated that the strike happened when people were sleeping.[33] witnesses reported that entire residential blocks were wiped out.[61] a witness who had been in the marketplace stated that about 150 rockets fell at and around the market place in less than 10 minutes.[62] per a resident and paramedic in the camp, the assault felt like a "horror movie" and that israeli drones and warplanes fired randomly throughout the night at peoples homes and those who tried to flee the area. videos were posted to social media, reportedly showing corpses with entrails spilling out lying on blood stained streets after the attack, although reuters was unable to immediately verify the footage.[53] additional footage showed palestinians in the market area diving for cover as missiles flew in and gunfire erupted.[63] the us denied that its gaza floating pier (intended for the delivery of aid into gaza) was used in the operation. the denial followed the release of imagery showing the landing zone used for the air evacuation immediately south along the coast from the pier, with the u.s. facility clearly visible in the near background.[64] according to reports, "at least one of the vehicles" containing the three male captives broke down and the israeli military called in support, "attacking from the air, from the sea and on the ground with massive force."[55] at 11:27 a.m., a strike occurred near the building from which the three male hostages were rescued. subsequently, the building was demolished by another strike. shortly before noon, another strike demolished the building where noa argamani had been held captive. eyal shahtout, a resident of a neighboring building, informed the new york times that his home was hit, resulting in many of his family members being buried under the debris. 18 of his family members were killed, including his wife, four children, and two grandchildren. the israeli military did not provide an explanation for why the home was targeted. to the south of the hostage sites, a market was also struck. at 11:45 a.m., plumes of smoke were visible in downtown nuseirat.[65] scores of local people, including children, were killed. according to a statement from doctors without borders, which works nearby at the al aqsa martyrs hospital in deir al balah, "there have been back to back mass casualties as densely populated areas are bombed. it’s way beyond what anyone could deal with in a functional hospital, let alone with the scarce resources we have here."[66] the al awda hospital in nuseirat was also overwhelmed with casualties, "including many children laid out in the corridors".[55] the strikes destroyed "apartment buildings throughout" [the] "camp, according to witnesses and video footage".[52] the un human rights office said that both israeli forces and palestinian armed groups may have committed war crimes, citing potential "violations of rules of proportionality, distinction and precaution" in the case of the former and "holding hostages in densely populated areas" for the latter.[67] the death toll resulting from the operation has been disputed. the gaza health ministry stated on the same day as the operation that the number of victims "has risen to 210 martyrs and more than 400 wounded." later that day the number was updated to 274 palestinians killed during the operation with around 700 wounded.[54][68] tanya haj hassan, a paediatric intensive care doctor with doctors without borders, stated that al aqsa hospital, where 109 palestinians including 23 children and 11 women and over 100 wounded victims were transported,[69] was a "complete bloodbath."[70] ziad, a paramedic and resident of nuseirat and abu ubaida, a spokesperson for al qassam brigades referred to the attack as a massacre.[18] another 100 people killed in the attacks were taken to al awda hospital.[69] it is not known how many combatants are included in these counts.[71][72][52] according to the idf, hamas pays palestinian families to hold the hostages in their houses, which may account for the high casualties.[8][73] in addition, a large firefight occurred as idf special forces were attempting to extract the hostages, reportedly coming under fire from dozens of militants with rpgs and machine guns when their vehicle became stuck. the idf then called in airstrikes to cover their evacuation.[54][8] the idf estimates the number of casualties from the operation was “under 100.”[62] hamas spokesman abu ubaida stated the operation resulted in the deaths of several other israeli hostages, including one with us citizenship,[74][22] idf spokesman peter lerner dismissed the claim.[75] the day after the operation, hamas's armed wing uploaded a video to its telegram channel appearing to show corpses of three hostages that were reportedly killed during the rescue operation. the faces of the corpses were obscured to prevent identification.[23][76] argamani was reunited with her father and transported to sheba medical center to be reunited with her mother, where she was being treated for terminal brain cancer. her father told reporters "today is my birthday, and what a present i received".[77] during a phone call with argamani, israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu said that "we didn't give up on you for a moment."[33] her mother died less than a month later.[78] the rescue operation was renamed as "operation arnon", in honor of arnon zmora, the commander of the rescue mission who later died of his wounds.[8] a pedestrian bridge in petah tikva has also been renamed "operation arnon bridge [he]".[79] arab israeli actress and tv presenter lama tatour was fired after she created a post on instagram regarding noa argamani's appearance. she wrote: "this is what a girl that's been in captivity for nine months looks like? [...] this is what innocent women and children are being killed for in gaza?" and said that argamani's eyebrows looked better than her own.[80] some interpreted her comments as "insensitive" and "mocking" argamani's appearance.[81][82] israeli war cabinet member benny gantz postponed a scheduled news conference the night of the raid, which coincided with his deadline to resign if prime minister benjamin netanyahu did not present a new plan for the war.[83] the following day, he resigned.[84] allegations of the united states military constructed floating pier in gaza being used in the idf operation, were seen after a video showing an idf helicopter taking off from the beach with the pier in the background began to circulate online on 8 june. two united states officials responded to the claims, stating that the pier was only used for humanitarian aid and the helicopter was used to return the hostages into israel and had landed south of the pier but not within the cordoned off area.[49] the u.s. had promised aid groups the pier would be a no go area for israeli forces and the un has put aid operations at the pier on hold while it investigates and decides whether the israeli usage, real or apparent, of the pier facilities and the perception of that by palestinians, mitigates against continued engagement at the pier. oxfam and other aid organizations said they are waiting for answers from the u.s. government.[24]

four hostages have been rescued in an israeli operation that took weeks of planning   but killed scores of palestinians in gaza and left behind a trail of devastation. at least 274 palestinians were killed in the operation and hundreds injured, gazan authorities said, who do not distinguish between civilian and military casualties. while there has been euphoria for the families of the four rescued   noa argamani, almog meir jan, andrey kozlov, and shlomi ziv, eight months after they were kidnapped from the nova music festival on october 7   celebrations could be brief. israel’s prime minister benjamin netanyahu remains under intense pressure, with his goal of destroying hamas and rescuing the remaining hostages still distant. he has refused to sign up to the latest peace plan, presented by us president joe biden last week, and the toll among palestinians continues to rise. here’s what we know about saturday’s operation. unusually, the israel defense forces (idf) opted for a daytime raid on the nuseirat camp in central gaza on saturday   saying that it allowed them a greater element of surprise. as part of their preparations, the military built models of the apartments the hostages were held in after receiving intelligence regarding their location. “israeli forces have been preparing for this rescue mission for weeks. they underwent intensive training,” israel defense forces (idf) rear admiral daniel hagari told a press briefing. hagari said israeli forces had to enter civilian areas to reach hostages as this was where hamas had embedded itself. some of the special forces were disguised as displaced palestinians and as members of hamas’s military wing, according a witness as well as reporting from cnn analyst barak ravid, citing eyewitnesses in the refugee camp. cnn has reached out to the idf for comment. without the cover of darkness, the idf ran a greater risk of failing to get in and out of gaza safely. one officer was shot and killed during the operation, according to israeli police. hagari said the idf had received intelligence on the location of the hostages beforehand, noting that hostages in gaza were frequently moved around and argamani had previously been held elsewhere. similar raids had been called off at the last minute “more than three or four times” due to unfavorable conditions, he added. the first phase of saturday’s operation saw the idf target militant infrastructure with pre planned strikes, hagari said. hagari said that the idf had come under intense fire, especially after withdrawing from the apartments, but did not provide evidence for his claims. “while under fire, under fire inside the buildings, under fire on the way out from gaza, our forces rescued our hostages,” he said. ravid, the cnn analyst, also reported there was a “robust firefight” after the hostages were rescued. the raid took place mid morning, meaning the streets were teeming with people shopping at a nearby market. the hostages were held in civilian buildings, according to the idf, in the midst of the densely populated camp. hagari said the hostages had been locked in two separate apartments in multi story buildings about 200 meters (650 feet) apart, with argamani held in a different building to the three men. related video ‘it is hell on earth’: civilian describes scene in gaza following israeli hostage rescue there were early indications of an ongoing mission when israel announced ahead of the news on saturday morning it was operating in nuseirat, but it had launched a new offensive in the area midweek. heavy bombardment was reported during the israeli rescue mission. there are varying reports on the number of palestinians killed. the latest figures from gazan authorities say 274 palestinians were killed and 698 injured   which would mark one of the deadliest days in months for people living in gaza. the idf has disputed those numbers, saying it estimated the number of casualties from the operation was “under 100.” cnn cannot independently verify either side’s figures. but local residents described the attack as a “hell on earth,” with scenes of carnage following the strikes that led up to the rescue. eyewitnesses have described civilians being struck down by airstrikes and shrapnel. one local palestinian man named abu abdallah told a cnn stringer on the ground that people were struck in their homes at around 5am local time. “we tried to get ambulances, but no one could enter as it was already a military zone,” he said. “dogs were eating people’s remains, we pulled out six martyrs, all torn up children and women, we risked our lives to get them to the hospital. the soldiers told us to go back but we had to continue,” he added. another local resident, nidal abdo, said he was shopping at nuseirat market before “a crazy bombardment started hitting everywhere.” “[it was] something we never witnessed before, maybe 150 rockets fell in less than 10 minutes, while we were running away more fell on the market,” he said. footage from al aqsa martyrs hospital, in nearby deir al balah, shows trucks and ambulances transferring injured people and bodies to the hospital. the hospital’s emergency room is overwhelmed. people can be seen in the footage waiting on the hospital floor. graphic video shows many palestinians, including children, injured with blood on their faces and clothes. footage from the hospital also shows people screaming and crying, huddled over bodies covered in blankets. families of the hostages expressed their overwhelming joy at having their loved ones returned safely. orit meir, mother of almog meir jan, said at a news conference saturday that she was excited to hug her son again. “i couldn’t stop hugging him,” she said. “tomorrow is my birthday so i got my present.” argamani was reunited with her terminally ill mother, who suffers from stage 4 cancer. netanyahu   who met with the rescued hostages and their families at sheba hospital on saturday   called the operation “heroic,” adding that the government would continue “to do everything we can” to recover all those being held in the enclave. the operation was “a great light in the terrible darkness,” israeli opposition leader yair lapid said saturday. avi marciano, father of corporal noa marciano, a 19 year old hostage who died in captivity, said netanyahu’s public celebrations over the hostage releases contrasted with how he reacted when the outcome was not as positive. related video watch freed israeli hostage reunite with family “i am truly happy from the bottom of my heart for the families that were fortunate and able to hug their loved ones. i’m also envious,” haaretz quoted him as saying. “this emphasizes how bad our ending was. when the ending is bad, the prime minister doesn’t show up. he doesn’t call, either.” hamas meanwhile accused israel of committing “a horrific massacre” on civilians in nuseirat. the militant group said israel’s killing of scores of people as it mounted a hostage rescue operation was a “brutal crime, devoid of the values of civilization and humanity.” palestinian leader mahmoud abbas has called for an emergency session of the un security council while several middle eastern countries condemned the operation. after the rescue mission, us national security adviser jake sullivan said an “enduring ceasefire” deal between israel and hamas is “the only credible path forward.” sullivan acknowledged the civilian toll of israel’s military operation saturday while saying hamas, which took the hostages during its deadly october 7 attacks on israel, was putting palestinians in harm’s way. hostage rescues are rare. this is only the third such successful operation of the conflict. saturday’s operation shows they are still possible and may encourage further efforts from the israeli military, given a major goal of israel’s gaza offensive is to rescue the remaining hostages. however some have pointed to a ceasefire deal as a much more effective way of freeing the hostages. more than 100 hostages were freed under a temporary truce last year, while israel has rescued seven hostages by military means. hagai levine, of the health team at the hostages and missing families forum, said operations such as the one seen on saturday were “not a way we can bring 120 hostages back home. “we must, all of us together, the world, follow president biden speech and go with the deal that will enable all of them, dead or alive, come back home with a ceasefire.” instead, levine called for a ceasefire deal that would “enable all of [the hostages], dead or alive” to be brought back home. related article israel rescues four hostages in operation gazan officials say killed more than 200 there are warnings that the idf’s deadly operation on saturday may have further set back a potential ceasefire agreement. an egyptian official told cnn that israel’s operation will have a “negative effect” on negotiations to end the war in gaza. “[it] won’t be easy,” the egyptian official, who is familiar with the talks, told cnn. egypt, along with qatar, has been helping to coordinate negotiations between israel and hamas. on sunday, the us called for a vote on its un security council resolution backing the proposal for a permanent ceasefire and release of the hostages in gaza. “israel has accepted this proposal and the security council has an opportunity to speak with one voice and call on hamas to do the same,” nate evans, the spokesperson for the us mission to the un, said in a statement sunday. “doing so would help save lives and the suffering of civilians in gaza as well as the hostages and their families,” he said. since november, intensive negotiations over a ceasefire and a deal to swap hostages for palestinian prisoners have landed in a stalemate. israel last month pressed ahead with its ground operation in central rafah despite international condemnation for its escalation in the southern gaza city where some 1.3 million palestinians were taking shelter before israel began its operation there. cnn’s teele rebane, hande atay alam, michael rios and lauren izso contributed to this report. © 2025 cable news network. a warner bros. discovery company. all rights reserved. cnn sans ™ & © 2016 cable news network.

middle east tensions in the town of nuseirat in central gaza, where the hostages were rescued, residents reported intense israeli bombardments. hospital officials say more than 200 people were killed in central gaza. here’s how israel’s mission to rescue four hostages unfolded. u.s. intelligence helped israel rescue four hostages in gaza. who are the four hostages rescued by the israeli military in gaza? at a weekly hostage rally in tel aviv, hope emerges with the return of four from gaza. for many israelis, the rescue was a reason to celebrate after a grim stretch. israeli forces rescued four hostages who had been held in gaza since the hamas led attack on oct. 7, the military said. the news of the operation in central gaza on saturday was met with jubilation in israel, where fear for the fate of the roughly 120 remaining captives has been rising after eight months of war. during the rescue operation, the israeli air force struck the town of nuseirat, where the hostages were rescued, and residents reported intense bombardments. khalil daqran, an official at a hospital, told reporters that dozens of palestinians had been killed and that the hospital’s wards and corridors were packed with the wounded. daniel hagari, the israeli military spokesman, told reporters that the rescue mission took place around 11 a.m. saturday, when forces located the four hostages in two separate buildings where they were being held by hamas militants in nuseirat. he said the israeli forces came under fire but managed to safely extract the hostages in two helicopters. an israeli special forces police officer injured in the operation later died of his wounds, the israeli police announced. a team of american hostage recovery officials stationed in israel assisted the israeli military’s effort to rescue the four captives by providing intelligence and other logistical support, an american official said, speaking without attribution to discuss ongoing, sensitive operations. the freed hostages   noa argamani, 26; almog meir jan, 22; andrey kozlov, 27; and shlomi ziv, 41   were kidnapped by palestinian militants from the nova music festival on oct. 7. all four are in good medical condition and have been transferred to a hospital in israel for further examination, the israeli authorities said in a statement. roughly 250 people in israel were abducted during the oct. 7 assault, according to the israeli government, including women, older people and young children. some 105 of them were released during a weeklong truce in november. israeli troops have brought home the bodies of around 19 others, including at least three unintentionally killed by israeli troops. despite an eight month military campaign in gaza, israel has struggled to free its hostages in bold rescue operations. the successful recovery of the four hostages raises the total number to seven, including a special forces raid in february in the southern city of rafah that freed two israelis held by hamas and a raid in october that released one. yoav gallant, israel’s defense minister, hailed what he called a “complex operation” by israeli soldiers, special forces and intelligence, who he said had “operated with extraordinary courage under heavy fire.” ms. argamani’s abduction, in particular, became a symbol of the brutality of the oct. 7 attack, in which an estimated 1,200 people were killed, according to israeli officials. in a video from the scene, palestinian assailants were seen driving ms. argamani away on a motorcycle as she cried for help and reached out to her boyfriend, avinatan or, as he was marched away. israel and hamas have continued negotiations on a cease fire that would see the release of the remaining hostages held in gaza. the united states has sought to pressure both sides to reach an accord after president biden gave a speech outlining what he called a phased israeli truce proposal.   aaron boxerman and rawan sheikh ahmad the israeli operation to rescue four hostages in the town of nuseirat in central gaza on saturday unleashed a heavy aerial bombardment and ground operations that killed more than 200 people, according to two hospital officials in the area. residents there said it was the heaviest onslaught they could recall during the eight month old war. one hospital official said israel struck a busy market, and video footage from the immediate aftermath of the attack showed bloodied bodies on the ground in what appeared to be a market that was struck. other video footage showed people running for cover as a powerful airstrike exploded near them. dr. khalil daqran, the spokesman for al aqsa martyrs hospital in nearby deir al balah, and marwan abu nasser, the acting administrative director of al awda hospital in nuseirat, said their two hospitals had received a total of more than 200 dead and many of the wounded from the attack on saturday. many of those killed were women and children, the hospital officials said. israel’s military spokesman, rear adm. daniel hagari, estimated the number of casualties to be under 100, without specifying whether these were dead or wounded or both. the new york times could not independently verify the death toll and it was not clear how many were civilians and how many were hamas militants. hours later some of the dead had already been buried by their families while others had yet to be claimed, according to dr. daqran. “the martyrs who have yet to be identified are still in the morgue. it is difficult to identify them,” he said. “it is difficult to identify them because some of the martyrs who arrived are nothing more than torn limbs from children and women and elderly.” tens of thousands of palestinian residents of gaza have fled to nuseirat in recent weeks to escape israeli bombardments in other parts of the embattled territory such as the southern city of rafah, where israel launched a new offensive recently. khaled al saadouni, a young man who witnessed the israeli operation in nuseirat, told reuters he had seen israeli special forces arrive in an apache attack helicopter and he also saw a white car with israeli forces. “the apache started to bomb and fire directly at people,” he said, according to reuters, adding that there were many dead and injured. “people fled,” he said. he said there were many displaced palestinians sheltering in the area that came under attack. “we brought 10 injured people in one ambulance. one of them was shot directly. we barely made it out through the alleyways,” he said. khitam awad, a 35 year old teacher, said she was at home teaching 25 young students and distributing gifts when the israeli attack began nearby. “we were near the strikes,” she told the new york times. “we don’t know how we escaped unharmed.” the strikes went on for two hours in an “insane way” and they couldn’t move from the house, she added. one of her colleagues, another teacher, later found out that two of her relatives had been killed. they huddled in one room with the students, she said, as around them homes were being struck. “we were hearing the sound of the tanks,” ms. awad said. “our nerves were frayed, we didn’t know what was happening around us, bombs and rockets and tanks.” at al aqsa hospital, the wounded and bodies of those killed filled the wards and corridors, according to the gaza health ministry. “the situation is catastrophic,” dr. daqran said. “we don’t have enough beds for all the wounded. we have five times as many injured than we have hospital beds.” as a result, many of the dead and wounded had to be sent to another nearby hospital, al awda, in nuseirat. “al awda hospital is a maternity hospital but it has been transformed to receive the injured that we don’t have space for in al aqsa hospital,” he said. mr. abu nasser, the acting administrative director of al awda hospital, said the medical facility’s capacity to hold bodies was limited and by the end of the day, some 100 bodies that had been brought to the hospital had been taken for burial by family members. “we’re a small hospital,” he said. “we simply don’t have the space.” in a news conference outside al aqsa hospital, dr. daqran called on palestinians in gaza to donate blood and on the international community to help gaza’s hospitals. the flood of victims into the hospitals came at a time when the few still functioning hospitals in gaza are struggling to continue operating as a result of continued israeli strikes and a lack of medicine, medical equipment and overworked generators. bilal shbair contributed reporting.   raja abdulrahim the israeli military’s mission to rescue four hostages was a rare operation that required weeks of planning, and was given the final go ahead just a few minutes before it commenced on saturday morning, according to israeli officials. israeli special forces, backed by the military, intelligence and air force, raided two buildings several hundred feet apart in a neighborhood in nuseirat, in central gaza. they brought home the four hostages   noa argamani, 26; almog meir jan, 22; andrey kozlov, 27; and shlomi ziv, 41   alive and in good medical condition. one police officer, part of the force that led the raid, was killed. scores of palestinians, including women and children, were killed during the rescue operation, according to local gaza health officials. the israeli military said it had targeted militants who had threatened its forces as they sought to extract the hostages. neither the israeli military nor palestinian health officials provided a breakdown of civilians and combatants killed in the raid. israeli troops have swept through much of gaza since their ground invasion began in late october. but they have managed to rescue only seven living hostages in three separate military operations, with roughly 120 captives remaining in gaza. several proposed rescue missions did not go forward for fear that the hostages or the forces would die in the process, according to two israeli defense officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive operation. in december, israeli special forces tried to rescue a hostage from hamas captivity, according to the two defense officials. sahar baruch, an israeli hostage, was killed during the exchange of fire and two israeli officers were seriously wounded. according to one of the defense officials, israeli intelligence first learned that ms. argamani was being held in an aboveground building near the market area of nuseirat. more information received later indicated that three other hostages were in another building in the same section, the official added. rear adm. daniel hagari, israel’s military spokesman, said israeli officers had worked for weeks to assemble the necessary pieces for the mission. israeli soldiers trained intensively based on models of the buildings where the hostages were believed to be held, he added. “this was a mission in the heart of a civilian neighborhood, where hamas had intentionally hidden among homes where there were civilians and armed terrorists guarding the hostages,” admiral hagari said. “and we must act in a way that brings those hostages home alive.” over the past three weeks, there were several occasions when it seemed possible to carry out the operation, but all of the attempts were canceled, before israeli forces were set to launch the mission, the two israeli defense officials said. on thursday, prime minister benjamin netanyahu of israel and yoav gallant, the israeli defense minister, met with senior defense officials again to discuss the operation’s risks and the possible scenarios, said a third israeli official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. the country’s leaders greenlit the rescue mission that night, the official said. but it still stood a chance of being canceled at the last minute, admiral hagari said. on saturday morning, herzi halevi, the military’s chief of staff, and ronen bar, the director of israel’s shin bet intelligence service, both gave the final go ahead just a few minutes before the operation started around 11 a.m., admiral hagari said. he added that they chose to move in the daylight, bearing down on the two buildings in nuseirat, in an attempt to catch hamas off guard since the armed group might expect such an operation to take place at night. the raid started simultaneously in both buildings, where the hostages were in locked rooms surrounded by armed guards, admiral hagari said. in one building   where ms. argamani was being held   the officers managed to take her hamas captors by surprise, he said. in the other, israeli forces engaged in a difficult firefight before reaching the remaining three hostages, he added. as they recovered the captives, the officers announced by radio that “the diamonds are in our hands,” using an assigned code word, admiral hagari said. they exited the buildings with hamas militants shooting at them and firing rocket propelled grenades, admiral hagari said. the officers shielded the hostages with their bodies to try to protect them, and israeli aircraft struck in and around the area, targeting the militants, he added. khalil daqran, a local official at al aqsa martyrs hospital in deir al balah, told reporters that many palestinians were killed and wounded during strikes near the nuseirat market, which he said had been packed with passers by. admiral hagari said that he had been told the military was aware of palestinian casualties resulting from the operation, and that he could not confirm how many were militants. he added that hamas had sought to fire at israeli forces from behind civilians. he added that “the cynical way that hamas is using the population also to fire at our forces” was “tragic.” the hostages were taken by car to two awaiting helicopters, admiral hagari said. one carried ms. argamani and the special forces officers. the second ferried the three remaining hostages and an injured police commander, who would later die from his wounds. around 1:30 p.m., the israeli government announced that the four hostages were home.   ronen bergman and aaron boxerman the u.s. provided intelligence on the hostages before israel’s successful rescue operation saturday, according to american and israeli officials briefed on the assistance. a team of american hostage recovery officials stationed in israel assisted the israeli military’s effort to rescue the four captives by providing intelligence and other logistical support, one american official said, speaking without attribution to discuss the sensitive operation. intelligence collection and analysis teams from the united states and britain have been in israel throughout the war, assisting israeli intelligence in collecting and analyzing information related to the hostages, some of them citizens of both countries, according to a senior israeli defense official familiar with the effort to locate and rescue the hostages. two israeli intelligence officials said the american military officials in israel provided some of the intelligence about the hostages rescued saturday. speaking in paris after meeting with emmanuel macron of france, president biden said he welcomed “the safe rescue of four hostages that were returned to their families in israel.” “we won’t stop working until all the hostages come home and a cease fire is reached,” he added, “and it’s essential.” the pentagon and the c.i.a. have been providing information collected from drone flights over gaza, communications intercepts and other sources about the potential location of hostages. while israel has its own intelligence, the united states and britain have been able to provide intelligence from the air and cyberspace that israel cannot collect on its own, the israeli official said. jake sullivan, the national security adviser, celebrated the rescue, and referred glancingly at the american assistance. “the united states is supporting all efforts to secure the release of hostages still held by hamas, including american citizens,” mr. sullivan said in a statement. “this includes through ongoing negotiations or other means.” mr. sullivan added that the cease fire proposal currently being discussed by negotiators from hamas, israel, egypt, qatar and the united states would be the way to bring home the remaining hostages. “the hostage release and cease fire deal that is now on the table would secure the release of all the remaining hostages together with security assurances for israel and relief for the innocent civilians in gaza,” he said. american officials have said their intelligence support for israel is focused on the location of hostages and information about hamas’s top leadership. in large measure this is because american officials believe the best way to persuade israel to end the war is to get back its hostages and capture or kill top hamas leaders. the israeli official said neither the american nor british teams were involved in the planning or execution of the military operations to rescue the hostages. israelis, experts in hostage rescue, would have required little support in the tactical planning. but the american and israeli officials said the outside intelligence did provide added value.   julian e. barnesronen bergman and michael d. shear four hostages abducted from the nova music festival and held by militants in gaza for the last eight months were rescued by israeli forces on saturday. since the hamas led terrorist attack on oct. 7, israel has freed only a small number of hostages through military force. saturday’s rescues occurred in nuseirat, in central gaza, where health officials reported that dozens of palestinians had been killed. here is what we know about the four hostages who were brought back to israel. noa argamani, 26, was taken hostage in the oct. 7 attack alongside her boyfriend, avinatan or. viral footage showed ms. argamani being taken into gaza on the back of a motorcycle as she cried out in desperation. ms. argamani and her boyfriend were abducted from the nova music festival in southern israel, where militants carried out brutal atrocities against partygoers. the fate of ms. argamani’s boyfriend is unknown. the plight of ms. argamani received outsize attention, in part because her mother, liora, has brain cancer and her condition has deteriorated significantly in recent months. “i don’t know how much time i have left,” the mother said last year. “i wish to see my noa at home.” andrey kozlov, 27, was working as a security guard at the music festival when he was taken. he recently immigrated to israel from russia and was a resident of rishon lezion, a city in central israel. in january, mikhail bogdanov, the russian deputy foreign minister, told hamas officials that the release of civilians captured in the oct. 7 attack, including mr. kozlov and two other russian citizens, should be sped up, according to a statement from the russian foreign ministry. in footage shared on social media on saturday, mr. kozlov could be seen smiling as he was escorted by troops from a military helicopter. almog meir jan, 22, was kidnapped a day before he was supposed to start a new job at a technology company, according to the hostage families forum. in december, sky news aired an interview with his mother, orit, who said that her son had called her on oct. 7 at 7:45 a.m. and described the chaotic scenes unfolding at the festival site. “mom, they closed the festival,” she recalled him saying. “there are rockets and shooting everywhere.” on saturday, footage of mr. meir jan’s family celebrating the news of his freedom was shared on social media. “i’m so excited,” his mother said. shlomi ziv, 41, was working as a security guard at the festival. he is a resident of elkosh, a community in northern israel, where he lived with his wife, miran, according to the hostage families forum. last year, ms. ziv said that she was certain he would return and that she was already preparing for the challenges of welcoming someone who had spent months in captivity. “we will be receiving a person who we don’t know what he saw, what he experienced, what he knows and what he doesn’t know,” she told seven10stories, an initiative that has collected testimonials from survivors of oct. 7. “this won’t be simple.”   adam rasgon reporting from jerusalem the photos of the missing that have become a fixture during weekly protests at hostage square in tel aviv were joined on saturday by joyous videos showing four israelis returning to their country and their families. with hostage posters held aloft, thousands stood and applauded as footage showed noa argamani, 26; almog meir jan, 22; andrey kozlov, 27; and shlomi ziv, 41, coming home. all four were kidnapped from a music festival during the oct. 7 attack on israel led by hamas. but, even amid the joy, there was fear over the fate of roughly 120 others still being held in gaza. “in this terrible situation, it gives hope,” said sergio chmiel, 62, whose nephews yair, 45, and eitan horn, 37, are among the hostages still in gaza. “maybe next time it will touch us.” mr. chmiel lamented that an officer died in the rescue operation, something he said could have been avoided with a negotiated deal. “while four families are joyous, one is sad,” mr. chmiel said. some at the rally were also saddened by the reports by gaza’s health authorities and palestinian media that scores of palestinians had been killed during israel’s operation to retrieve the hostages. “some people will justify it,” said maya reuveni, 19, “but at the end of the day, death is death. every lost life hurts me.” as the war continued with no end in sight, many at the demonstration expressed disbelief and frustration with how long it was taking to recover the remaining hostages. maytal moryosef, 28, from tel aviv, said that she would like the israeli government to take responsibility and work to reach a deal. “each time it’s two here, four there,” ms. moryosef said, referring to israel’s military operations that have managed to sporadically bring back some of the hostages from gaza. “it’s not enough. with 120 left, if two return every two months, we’ll be in this saga for three years. it just can’t continue like this.”   adam sella reporting from tel aviv, israel the israeli military’s rescue on saturday of four hostages instantly lifted the mood in a country long gripped by angst and dread over the plight of the remaining captives in gaza. many israelis said it was the first good news they had heard in months. and it unfolded with dizzying speed as the hostages were whisked out of nuseirat, a densely packed area of the central gaza strip, and flown by helicopter to a hospital near tel aviv. they had traveled a relatively short distance of about 50 miles but crossed a chasm of boundless suffering. the first reports of the rescue emerged around lunchtime on saturday, in the midst of the general quiet of the jewish sabbath. the rescue itself had taken place just over two hours earlier, at about 11 a.m. local time, according to the military’s chief spokesman, rear adm. daniel hagari. images and video footage of the freed hostages quickly emerged and flashed across the main television channels, which all switched to live coverage, replacing the prerecorded programming and reruns typical of the sabbath. jubilant crowds gathered spontaneously, cheering, singing and waving israeli flags outside the homes of the four and at the entrance of the sheba medical center, where they were beginning their recovery in a closed wing that was hastily prepared to receive them. dr. itai pessach, the head of sheba’s returning hostages medical team, said the hospital had been told only on saturday morning to prepare to receive four released captives. prime minister benjamin netanyahu rushed to the special wing to greet the former hostages and their relatives. his office quickly released images and video footage from the scene. “we will bring them all back,” mr. netanyahu vowed in a televised statement before he left the hospital. the emotional outpouring came after a particularly grim few weeks in israel, with the war in gaza grinding into its eighth month, no resolution in sight and an escalation of hostilities across the northern border with lebanon. of the 120 hostages who remained in gaza as of this past week, after being captured during the hamas led terrorist attack of oct. 7, more than 30 had already been declared dead by the israeli authorities. just days ago, israelis were informed that four hostages abducted on oct. 7 had perished a few months ago in captivity in circumstances that were not immediately clear. all four had appeared alive in hostage videos issued by their captors   one video with three hostages was issued in december, another last month of the fourth, although it was unclear when they were filmed. their remains are still in gaza. in may, the israeli military retrieved the remains of seven other hostages during operations in the palestinian coastal enclave. the israeli news media paid little attention on saturday to the heavy death toll reported by officials in gaza as a result of the rescue operation. one israeli commando who took part in the raid was gravely injured in armed clashes and died of his wounds. pressure has been building on the israeli government to reach a deal with hamas for the release of all the remaining hostages. but the latest israeli proposal for a truce and a hostage and prisoner swap, as outlined by president biden more than a week ago, is still shrouded in uncertainty, with the sides yet to reach understandings via mediators that would allow for a resumption of negotiations. many of the relatives of the returned hostages, as well as relatives of those still in gaza, exhorted the israeli government, in televised statements, to act to bring them all home by any means possible. “look at the joy and happiness today,” said einav zangauker, whose son, matan zangauker, is still being held captive in gaza. “imagine what will happen when they all return,” she added, urging the government to go for a deal. rawan sheikh ahmad and jonathan rosen contributed reporting.   isabel kershner reporting from jerusalem the united nations will add israel, hamas and palestinian islamic jihad to a list of countries and armed groups that harm children when it releases its annual report on children and armed conflict, citing the heavy toll the war in gaza has taken on minors, including killing, maiming and starvation, u.n. officials said. stéphane dujarric, the u.n. spokesman, said the body’s chief of staff called the israeli ambassador to the united nations, gilad erdan, on friday to inform him that israel would be listed this year. “the call was a courtesy afforded to countries that are newly listed,” mr. dujarric said, “to give countries a heads up and avoid leaks.” hamas, the armed group that led gaza before the war, and palestinian islamic jihad, the second largest armed group in the enclave, will be named in the report. hamas is being cited because its fighters abducted and killed israeli children when they attacked israel on oct. 7, a u.n. official said. armed groups that harm children in conflicts, like the taliban and boko haram, are routinely named in the annual report. the news of israel’s listing further strained an already deteriorating relationship between it and the united nations. mr. erdan called the move “an immoral decision that aids terrorism and rewards terrorists.” he made a video recording of the phone call and released parts of it on the social media site x. mr. dujarric, the u.n. spokesman, called the release of a recording of the telephone call “shocking and unacceptable and something i’ve never seen in my 25 years serving this organization.” the united nations’ special representative for children and armed conflict prepares the yearly report under a mandate from the general assembly and the security council. the report will be presented to members of the council next friday and released publicly on june 18, mr. dujarric said. the council will have an open debate about the report’s findings later this month. during hamas’s terrorist attack on oct. 7, armed men kidnapped children, some of them toddlers and babies, and held them hostage in gaza. children were also among the roughly 1,200 israelis and foreigners killed. israel’s retaliatory bombing campaign and ground war in gaza has killed at least 36,000 people, gazan health officials say, a large portion of them women and children. the united nations has said that children in gaza also face famine and starvation because israel has restricted humanitarian aid. many children have also lost limbs or been gravely wounded in other ways. majed bamya, the palestinian deputy ambassador to the united nations, said in a post on x, “israeli ministers are the only ones surprised of such a development (list will be released next week) after the killing and maiming of so many palestinian children.”   farnaz fassihi and aaron boxerman

wafaa shurafa, associated press wafaa shurafa, associated press sam mednick, associated press sam mednick, associated press jack jeffery, associated press jack jeffery, associated press leave your feedback deir al balah, gaza strip (ap)   israel on saturday carried out its largest hostage rescue operation since the latest war with hamas began, taking four to safety out of central gaza amid the military’s heavy air and ground assault. at least 210 dead palestinians, including children, were brought to local hospitals, a health official said. israelis were jubilant as the army said it freed noa argamani, 26; almog meir jan, 22; andrey kozlov, 27; and shlomi ziv, 41, in a daytime operation in the heart of nuseirat, raiding two locations at once while under fire. all were well, the military said. they were taken by helicopter for medical checks and tearful reunions with loved ones after 246 days held. argamani had been one of the most widely recognized hostages after being taken, like the three others, from a music festival. the video of her abduction showed her seated between two men on a motorcycle as she screamed, “don’t kill me!” watch: survivors, rescuers in hamas music festival attack recount the day’s horrors her mother, liora, has brain cancer and had released a video pleading to see her daughter. israel’s channel 13 said argamani was moved to the hospital where her mother is treated. in a message released by the government, argamani told prime minister benjamin netanyahu she was “very excited,” saying she hadn’t heard hebrew in so long. netanyahu in a statement vowed to continue the fighting until all hostages are freed. the operation was “daring in nature, planned brilliantly, and executed in an extraordinary fashion,” defense minister yoav gallant said. israeli aircraft hummed overhead as the bodies of 109 palestinians including 23 children and 11 women were taken to al aqsa martyrs hospital, where spokesperson khalil degran told the associated press more than 100 wounded also arrived. he said that overall, 210 dead had been taken there and to al awda hospital, saying he had spoken to the director there. al awda’s numbers couldn’t immediately be confirmed. ap reporters saw dozens of bodies brought from the nuseirat and deir al balah areas, as smoke rose in the distance and armored vehicles rolled by. palestinians inspect a house hit in an israeli strike, due to an israeli military operation, amid the israel hamas conflict, in nuseirat refugee camp, in the central gaza strip, june 8, 2024. photo by emad abu shawiesh/reuters a baby was among the dead. small children wailed, covered in blood. bodies were placed on the ground outside, their feet bare, as more wounded were rushed in. “my two cousins were killed, and two other cousins were seriously injured. they did not commit any sin. they were sitting at home,” one relative said in the chaos. as palestinians explored the newly destroyed buildings, a small child sat on a collapsed metal door, overwhelmed. neighboring egypt condemned “with the strongest terms” israel’s attacks on the nuseirat refugee camp, with its foreign ministry calling it a “flagrant violation of all rules of international law.” neighboring jordan also condemned it. “the bloodbath must end immediately,” the european union’s foreign policy chief josep borrell said on the social platform x, noting reports of civilian deaths. israel’s military said it had attacked “threats to our forces in the area,” adding that one commando died from his wounds. israel’s channel 12 said the rescue force went into the heavily populated nuseirat camp and burst into the two apartments where the hostages were, killing the captors. one getaway vehicle was shot and they came under heavy fire. additional forces moved in to rescue them, and israel used heavy fire to get them out. a u.s. hostage cell provided advice and support throughout the process of locating and rescuing the hostages, according to a biden administration official, who was not authorized to comment and requested anonymity. the hostage cells are multi agency teams. hamas took some 250 hostages during the oct. 7 attack that killed about 1,200 people. about half were released in a weeklong cease fire in november. about 120 hostages remain, with 43 pronounced dead. survivors include about 15 women, two children under 5 and two men in their 80s. read more: nightmare continues for families of hostages not slated for release during temporary truce saturday’s operation brought the total number of rescued hostages to seven. two were freed in february and one was freed in the aftermath of the october attack. israeli troops have recovered the bodies of at least 16 others, according to the government. the latest rescue lifted some spirits in israel as divisions deepen over the best way to bring hostages home. many israelis urge netanyahu to embrace a cease fire deal u.s. president joe biden announced last month, but far right allies threaten to collapse his government if he does. netanyahu, whose support has fallen, rushed to the hospital to greet the freed hostages. but thousands of israelis again gathered saturday evening for the latest anti government demonstration and calls for a cease fire agreement. “it’s time to pay the price of a political deal. one deal that will bring them all back without risking soldiers,” said omri shtivi, whose brother idan marked his 29th birthday saturday while in captivity. it was unclear what effect the rescue might have on apparently stalled cease fire efforts. u.s. secretary of state antony blinken will return to the middle east next week, seeking a breakthrough. “the hostage release and cease fire deal that is now on the table would secure the release of all the remaining hostages together with security assurances for israel and relief for the innocent civilians in gaza,” national security adviser jake sullivan said in a statement. watch: biden details a 3 phase hostage deal aimed at winding down the israel hamas war international pressure also mounts on israel to limit civilian bloodshed in its war in gaza, which reached its eighth month on friday with more than 36,700 palestinians killed, according to gaza’s health ministry, which does not distinguish between fighters and civilians. palestinians face widespread hunger because fighting and israeli restrictions have largely cut off the flow of aid. israel is intensifying operations across central gaza, where the hostages were rescued. on thursday, an israeli airstrike hit a u.n. run school compound in nuseirat, killing over 33 people inside the school, including three women and nine children. israel said some 30 militants were inside at the time and on friday released the names of 17 militants it said were killed. however, only nine of those names matched with records of the dead from the hospital morgue. one of the alleged militants was an 8 year old boy, according to hospital records. israel’s military on saturday asserted that “hamas is a terror organization that often uses fake documents disguising terrorists as women or children.” meanwhile, benny gantz, a popular centrist member of israel’s three member war cabinet who had threatened to resign from the government if it didn’t adopt a new plan by saturday for the war in gaza, postponed an expected announcement. netanyahu urged him not to step down. mednick and jeffery reported from jerusalem. associated press writer aamer madhani in washington contributed to this report. left: rescued hostage noa argamani embraces her father, yakov argamani, after the military said that israeli forces rescued four hostages alive from the central gaza strip, in ramat gan, israel, in this handout image obtained by reuters on june 8, 2024. photo provided by israeli army/handout via reuters by josef federman, associated press, larry fenn, associate press by matthew lee, associated press by wafaa shurafa, samy magdy, associated press by liset cruz, associated press by amna nawaz, sonia kopelev, teresa cebrián aranda wafaa shurafa, associated press wafaa shurafa, associated press sam mednick, associated press sam mednick, associated press jack jeffery, associated press jack jeffery, associated press support provided by: learn more thank you. please check your inbox to confirm. world jun 06 © 1996   2025 newshour productions llc. all rights reserved. pbs is a 501(c)(3) not for profit organization. sections about stay connected thank you. please check your inbox to confirm. learn more about friends of the news hour. support for news hour provided by

four hostages kidnapped by hamas have been reunited with their families, after being rescued in a raid that palestinian officials say killed scores of people. noa argamani, 26, almog meir jan, 22, andrei kozlov, 27, and shlomi ziv, 41, were freed on saturday, eight months since being kidnapped from the nova music festival on 7 october. israeli forces, backed by air strikes, fought intense gun battles with hamas in the nuseirat area, in what the israel defense forces called a "high risk, complex mission". palestinian officials say women and children were among those killed in the military assault. two hospitals in gaza, al aqsa hospital and al awda hospital, said they had counted 70 bodies between them, while hamas's government media office said at least 210 people had been killed in israeli strikes in and around the al nuseirat refugee camp. israel estimated there were fewer than 100 casualties, idf spokesman daniel hagari said. images from the area show intense bombardment, and hospitals there said they were overwhelmed with casualties, including children, and that they were unable to treat everyone. other photos show people mourning the dead. the rare rescue of hostages   a joint operation conducted by the idf, israel security agency and israel police   comes eight months into war with hamas in gaza. idf spokesman daniel hagari said the mission was based on "precise" intelligence and the hostages were freed from two separate buildings in nuseirat. israeli forces came under fire during the operation, he said. one special forces officer was wounded in the gaza hostage rescue and later died in hospital, israeli police said. the idf said the released hostages were all in good health, and they were later pictured embracing family members at a medical centre near tel aviv. israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu praised israeli forces for operating "creatively and bravely". "we will not let up until we complete the mission and return home all the hostages   both those alive and dead," he added. defence minister yoav gallant said special forces operated "under heavy fire" when rescuing the four hostages. "this is one of the most heroic and extraordinary operations i have witnessed over the course of 47 years serving in israel’s defence establishment," mr gallant said. the us also provided intelligence support to israel in the raid, according to the bbc's partner cbs news which cited two american officials. they added that us forces did not take part in the operation and the temporary pier in gaza   which has now resumed aid deliveries after being damaged by heavy seas   was not used in the operation. miss argamani was kidnapped from the nova festival and harrowing video footage from 7 october showed the 26 year old being taken away on the back of a motorbike screaming, "don't kill me!" fresh video of her being reunited with her father, smiling and embracing him on board a vehicle, was broadcast soon after news of the rescue operation on saturday. mr kozlov, a russian who moved to israel in 2022, and mr ziv had both been working as security guards at the festival when they were kidnapped. mr jan had been due to start a job at a large tech company the day after he was kidnapped. the hostages families forum headquarters, a group representing the families of the hostages, described the rescue as “a miraculous triumph” and thanked the idf for the “heroic operation”. the group added: “the israeli government must remember its commitment to bring back all 120 hostages still held by hamas   the living for rehabilitation, the murdered for burial.” while there was jubilation in israel, images and video showed death, injury and destruction in the area, including around the al nuseirat refugee camp. according to bbc verify, it appeared that israeli strikes took place across several locations in central gaza, but nuseirat   the location of the idf operation to release four hostages   seems to have been hit hardest. one video from the al aqsa hospital shows numerous people with injuries lying on the floor, while other videos showed a frequent stream of new patients being driven in by car and ambulance and carried into the building. the hamas government media office said at least 400 were wounded in the densely populated area. palestinian president mahmoud abbas has called for an emergency united nations security council session to discuss what he has called "the bloody massacre that was carried out by the israeli forces" in and around the al nuseirat refugee camp. the european union's high representative for foreign affairs, josep borrell said on x: "reports from gaza of another massacre of civilians are appalling. "we condemn this in the strongest terms. the bloodbath must end immediately." the rescue of hostages comes amid efforts for a ceasefire and hostage release deal between israel and hamas. mr netanyahu has been urged to reach an agreement but faces opposition from far right allies who say military action is the only way to bring the hostages back. saturday’s operation is the most successful rescue of hostages by the israeli military in this war   and could change the calculation of a prime minister who is under increasing pressure. israeli war cabinet minister benny gantz cancelled a news conference which had been scheduled for saturday. it comes amid speculation mr gantz would quit having previously threatened to resign from the war cabinet if mr netanyahu did not approve a post war plan for gaza by 8 june. world leaders, including us president joe biden, france's emmanuel macron and german chancellor olaf scholz have welcomed the news of the hostage rescue. in response to the military offensive in nuseirat, hamas political leader ismail haniyeh said israel could not force its choices on the group. he said the group would not agree to a ceasefire deal unless it achieved security for palestinians. during its 7 october attacks in southern israel hamas killed about 1,200 people and took some 251 people. some 116 remain in the palestinian territory, including 41 the army says are dead. a deal agreed in november saw hamas release 105 hostages in return for a week long ceasefire and some 240 palestinian prisoners in israeli jails. on saturday, the hamas run health ministry said the death toll in gaza is now 36,801 people. correction 21st june: this article originally described noa argamani as a chinese born israeli citizen. however miss argamani was born in israel and so this sentence has been amended. "i don't know how to put it into words," says one of the hostages released from gaza last month. the in laws of eli sharabi say they are worried he may not know his wife and daughters have been killed. or levy, ohad ben ami and eli sharabi are returning home after being released in gaza on saturday. a total of 135 people captured during the 7 october attacks have been released or freed. the men were all taken captive during the 7 october attacks and have been held in gaza for 16 months. copyright 2025 bbc. all rights reserved. the bbc is not responsible for the content of external sites. read about our approach to external linking.

search the news, stories & people personalise the news and stay in the know emergency backstory newsletters 中文新闻 berita bahasa indonesia tok pisin analysis topic:war a mission that required the precision of brain surgery   that's how israel's military described the complexity of saturday's operation to rescue four israeli hostages after 246 days in captivity. the four hostages had been held in two apartment buildings, 200 metres apart, surrounded by hamas gunman and thousands of palestinian civilians in a busy central gaza neighbourhood. noa argamani was in one building, and the three men almog meir jan, andrey kozlov and shlomi ziv in the other. they were all inside locked rooms being guarded by an armed militant. just outside the door, israel says, were the families of the militants, including wives and children, living together with their captive. israeli troops rescued four hostages on saturday, eight months after they were kidnapped from a music festival. daylight would give the israeli defense forces (idf) soldiers and members of the israeli police the element of surprise   a raid like this would typically take place at night. it also increased the danger to the special forces getting in and out, and the risk to thousands of palestinian civilians who packed the busy area. the military says it had considered trying to rescue the hostages in just one building, knowing the complexities of trying to storm two at the same time, but they felt it would have increased the risk of those held in the second building being killed. they had to storm both buildings at exactly the same time. the teams had to work completely in sync with each other. senior idf leaders have called it a "surgical operation" involving hundreds of personnel. for weeks they had practised different scenarios that could play out, building full scale models of the buildings to drill every step of the plan. and then, under the cover of air strikes and on the ground gunfire, the rescue began. the military says the extraction of noa was relatively straight forward given the circumstances, but says major gun battles erupted at the home where ziv, meir jan and kozlov were being held. the hostages, including andrey kozlov (pictured), return home. (reuters: marko djurica) later their vehicle also came under fire and was held up before other forces reached the scene to complete the extraction and airlift them to a hospital in israel. "we called the hostages diamonds," idf rear admiral daniel hagari said, as he described the moment he knew they were safe. "they said, we have the diamond in our hands," he said. "it's a very emotional, happy day for the state of israel." left behind in gaza were scenes of chaos, destruction and death. gazan health authorities say more than 270 palestinian civilians were killed in the area during the israeli operation, including women and children. israel says it knows of less than 100 palestinian causalities, including hamas militants, who it claims fired rpgs at israeli forces from street corners. the rescue effort has been described by the military as the most complex and daring hostage mission to date in the israel gaza war. israeli leadership considers it as a success. it took weeks of military planning and intelligence gathering, reportedly with the help of the united states, to rescue four people. but about 120 remain   and even the army admits it cannot perform similar operations to rescue them all. the self described daring operation echoed the legendary 1976 entebbe rescue mission   an event that gave israel a reputation that it gets hostages back, no matter what. rear admiral hagari said the preparation for the gaza hostage rescue mission was on a "scale like entebbe". during the 1976 incident, palestinian and german extremists highjacked a plane with 250 hostages and held them captive at uganda's entebbe international airport. benjamin netanyahu's brother once led a team that rescued 102 hostages and created a legend. it gave israel a reputation for getting hostages back no matter what, but can they pull it off this time? while some were let go, 103 israeli and jewish passengers and crew were kept hostage, prompting israel to launch an extraordinary rescue mission to get them back. elite units of israeli commandos stormed the airport grounds and in less than a hour, had rescued the captives, blowing up 11 fighter jets to make their escape. three hostages were killed along with one senior israeli officer   yoni netanyahu, the brother of now israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu. the entebbe rescue has since become so famous, it's been made into books and movies that to this day serve as an beacon of hope   and expectation   that sheer military force can rescue the hostages inside gaza. but the conditions in gaza are vastly different, and the entebbe threshold cannot be replicated across the palestinian enclave. during a briefing with journalists just hours after the hostage rescue, rear admiral hagari detailed the complexities of the operation, and how the conditions had to be near perfect to secure the release of the four captives. hamas has had its day of reckoning over the violent october 7 attacks, but israel's day of reckoning for its eight month long response is still to come. the question is, has its response been proportional? the air strikes and gunfire used as cover for the mission resulted in a death toll inside gaza more than 65 times the number of israeli lives saved in the mission, according to numbers reported by the gazan health ministry. some palestinian activists have made the comparison that lives of the four israeli hostages were treated as being worth more than 270 gazans. still, 116 hostages remain, both dead and alive, inside gaza. and with that assessment came a significant admission from rear admiral hagari. "we know we cannot do operations to rescue all of them," he said, voicing what many in israel have been thinking, and saying on the streets, for months. in recent days, the military leader has been more vocal about the limitations of his forces inside of gaza, openly telling the public that sheer military power alone will not bring the hostages home. he has reiterated that the best hope of securing their release is with a diplomatic deal. "we saw it in the past, what brought the biggest number of hostages was a deal," rear admiral hagari said. "what will bring most of the hostages back home [now] is a deal." despite news of four hostages being rescued, there were protests against the netanyahu government in tel aviv. (reuters: marko djurica ) although rear admiral hagari was keen to stress the army would keep looking for opportunities to rescue more hostages, the statements sought to moderate public expectations that a purely military strategy would bring all the hostages home. and the numbers back this up. in the eight months of war that have passed since october 7, only seven hostages have been rescued in three separate operations. the military is also investigating whether its own actions have killed several of those who remain there. rear admiral hagari's statements have increased the pressure on israel's government to keep negotiating with hamas to secure a ceasefire and hostage release deal. israeli police deployed a water cannon at a demonstration against prime minister benjamin netanyahu's government after the hostages were released. (reuters: marko djurica) within hours of news of the hostage rescue being made public, tens of thousands of israelis were back on the streets of tel aviv, protesting and demanding the government make a deal with hamas. "this evening, the families of the hostages, supported by tens of thousands of people, united to demand the return of all the hostages through the purposed deal," hostage families said. "a deal that can bring them all back   the living for rehabilitation and the murdered for burial." israel has carried out its largest hostage rescue operation, taking four to safety out of central gaza in a heavy air and ground assault that gazan health officials say has killed scores of palestinians. here's what we know about how the daytime mission unfolded. aviram meir, the uncle of freed hostage almog meir jan, also backed calls for a deal as the way forward. "we want all the other hostages to come back with the deal. we need the deal to bring everybody back," he said. but an elusive deal is still stuck in negotiations. attempts by the united states and regional countries to forge a deal that would release all remaining hostages in return for a ceasefire have repeatedly failed as israel presses its assault in gaza. among the crowds on the streets of tel aviv, are some who believe prime minister netanyahu's reluctance to make a deal at any cost is an attempt to appease his right wing coalition partners. those partners have threatened to quit and bring down the government should a deal be made. one member of israel's war cabinet, benny gantz, resigned overnight. he was not a member of the coalition before october 7, so netanyahu's government is stable for now, but he was a moderate voice inside the war cabinet   a voice that is now gone. meanwhile, washington's top diplomat antony blinken maintains "the only thing standing in the way of achieving this ceasefire is hamas". but both israel and hamas seem to be stuck at the same obstacle that has seen previous attempts at a deal scuttled. hamas demands the war ends and israeli troops to be completely withdrawn from gaza. israel says it will not agree to those terms and maintains the goal is to destroy hamas. saving four hostages may have delivered netanyahu a brief moment of good news, but even his own military knows it will take a far more complex operation in diplomacy to bring the rest home. topic:federal government topic:government and politics topic:unrest, conflict and war topic:wellness analysis by richard willingham topic:unrest, conflict and war topic:explainer topic:explainer israel occupied palestinian territories war topic:federal government topic:government and politics topic:unrest, conflict and war topic:wellness analysis by richard willingham topic:mixed martial arts topic:state and territory elections topic:plants topic:world politics we acknowledge aboriginal and torres strait islander peoples as the first australians and traditional custodians of the lands where we live, learn, and work. this service may include material from agence france presse (afp), aptn, reuters, aap, cnn and the bbc world service which is copyright and cannot be reproduced. aest = australian eastern standard time which is 10 hours ahead of gmt (greenwich mean time)

copyright 2025 the associated press. all rights reserved. benny gantz, a centrist member of israel’s three man war cabinet, announced his resignation on sunday. israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu held a cabinet meeting in jerusalem on sunday and hailed the “warriors” who took part in the gaza raid which freed four hostages. israeli army released new footage of the operation to rescue four hostages the israeli military on sunday released footage of what it claimed showed the operation that rescued four hostages from gaza. gaza’s health ministry says at least 274 palestinians were killed in the israeli air and ground raid. israeli police used water cannons in tel aviv on saturday to disperse protesters at a rally against the government of israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu. after a peaceful demonstration of thousands demanding new elections and a deal to release the hostages held in gaza, protesters moved to another point of the city where mounted police officers and water cannons were used to disperse them. (ap/ moshe edri) a palestinian runs away from an israeli tank in the central gaza strip on sunday, june 9, 2024. (ap photo/abdel kareem hana) palestinian children wounded in the israeli bombardment of the gaza strip are treated in al aqsa hospital in deir al balah, sunday, june 9, 2024. (ap photo/saher alghorra) carrying an weapon, a man pushes a baby trolley past a wall with photographs of hostages who were kidnapped during the oct. 7 hamas cross border attack in israel, in jerusalem, sunday, june 9, 2024. (ap photo/leo correa) a palestinian wounded in the israeli bombardment of the gaza strip is treated in al aqsa hospital in deir al balah, sunday, june 9, 2024. (ap photo/saher alghorra) a woman pushes a baby trolley past empty chairs displaying photographs of hostages who were kidnapped during the oct. 7 hamas cross border attack in israel, set on the street in jerusalem, sunday, june 9, 2024. (ap photo/leo correa) palestinians wounded in the israeli bombardment of the gaza strip are brought to al aqsa hospital in deir al balah on sunday, june 9, 2024. (ap photo/saher alghorra) family and friends of the remaining hostages held in the gaza strip by the hamas militant group launch a small blimp calling for their release in tel aviv, israel, sunday, june 9, 2024. on saturday, israel rescued four hostages who were kidnapped in the hamas led attack on oct. 7, the largest such recovery operation since the war began in gaza. (ap photo/ariel schalit) corrects age: almog meir jan, 22, kidnapped from israel in a hamas led attack on oct. 7, 2023, raises his hands after arriving by helicopter to the sheba medical center in ramat gan, israel, saturday, june 8, 2024. israel says it has rescued four hostages in gaza who were kidnapped in a hamas led attack on oct. 7. (ap photo/tomer appelbaum) andrey kozlov, 27, kidnapped from israel in a hamas led attack on oct. 7, 2023, arrives by helicopter to the sheba medical center in ramat gan, israel, saturday, june 8, 2024. israel says it has rescued four hostages in gaza who were kidnapped in a hamas led attack on oct. 7. (ap photo/tomer appelbaum)(ap photo/tomer appelbaum) benny gantz, a centrist member of israel’s three man war cabinet, announced his resignation on sunday. israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu held a cabinet meeting in jerusalem on sunday and hailed the “warriors” who took part in the gaza raid which freed four hostages. israeli army released new footage of the operation to rescue four hostages the israeli military on sunday released footage of what it claimed showed the operation that rescued four hostages from gaza. gaza’s health ministry says at least 274 palestinians were killed in the israeli air and ground raid. israeli police used water cannons in tel aviv on saturday to disperse protesters at a rally against the government of israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu. after a peaceful demonstration of thousands demanding new elections and a deal to release the hostages held in gaza, protesters moved to another point of the city where mounted police officers and water cannons were used to disperse them. (ap/ moshe edri) a palestinian runs away from an israeli tank in the central gaza strip on sunday, june 9, 2024. (ap photo/abdel kareem hana) a palestinian runs away from an israeli tank in the central gaza strip on sunday, june 9, 2024. (ap photo/abdel kareem hana) palestinian children wounded in the israeli bombardment of the gaza strip are treated in al aqsa hospital in deir al balah, sunday, june 9, 2024. (ap photo/saher alghorra) palestinian children wounded in the israeli bombardment of the gaza strip are treated in al aqsa hospital in deir al balah, sunday, june 9, 2024. (ap photo/saher alghorra) carrying an weapon, a man pushes a baby trolley past a wall with photographs of hostages who were kidnapped during the oct. 7 hamas cross border attack in israel, in jerusalem, sunday, june 9, 2024. (ap photo/leo correa) carrying an weapon, a man pushes a baby trolley past a wall with photographs of hostages who were kidnapped during the oct. 7 hamas cross border attack in israel, in jerusalem, sunday, june 9, 2024. (ap photo/leo correa) a palestinian wounded in the israeli bombardment of the gaza strip is treated in al aqsa hospital in deir al balah, sunday, june 9, 2024. (ap photo/saher alghorra) a palestinian wounded in the israeli bombardment of the gaza strip is treated in al aqsa hospital in deir al balah, sunday, june 9, 2024. (ap photo/saher alghorra) a woman pushes a baby trolley past empty chairs displaying photographs of hostages who were kidnapped during the oct. 7 hamas cross border attack in israel, set on the street in jerusalem, sunday, june 9, 2024. (ap photo/leo correa) a woman pushes a baby trolley past empty chairs displaying photographs of hostages who were kidnapped during the oct. 7 hamas cross border attack in israel, set on the street in jerusalem, sunday, june 9, 2024. (ap photo/leo correa) palestinians wounded in the israeli bombardment of the gaza strip are brought to al aqsa hospital in deir al balah on sunday, june 9, 2024. (ap photo/saher alghorra) palestinians wounded in the israeli bombardment of the gaza strip are brought to al aqsa hospital in deir al balah on sunday, june 9, 2024. (ap photo/saher alghorra) family and friends of the remaining hostages held in the gaza strip by the hamas militant group launch a small blimp calling for their release in tel aviv, israel, sunday, june 9, 2024. on saturday, israel rescued four hostages who were kidnapped in the hamas led attack on oct. 7, the largest such recovery operation since the war began in gaza. (ap photo/ariel schalit) family and friends of the remaining hostages held in the gaza strip by the hamas militant group launch a small blimp calling for their release in tel aviv, israel, sunday, june 9, 2024. on saturday, israel rescued four hostages who were kidnapped in the hamas led attack on oct. 7, the largest such recovery operation since the war began in gaza. (ap photo/ariel schalit) corrects age: almog meir jan, 22, kidnapped from israel in a hamas led attack on oct. 7, 2023, raises his hands after arriving by helicopter to the sheba medical center in ramat gan, israel, saturday, june 8, 2024. israel says it has rescued four hostages in gaza who were kidnapped in a hamas led attack on oct. 7. (ap photo/tomer appelbaum) corrects age: almog meir jan, 22, kidnapped from israel in a hamas led attack on oct. 7, 2023, raises his hands after arriving by helicopter to the sheba medical center in ramat gan, israel, saturday, june 8, 2024. israel says it has rescued four hostages in gaza who were kidnapped in a hamas led attack on oct. 7. (ap photo/tomer appelbaum) andrey kozlov, 27, kidnapped from israel in a hamas led attack on oct. 7, 2023, arrives by helicopter to the sheba medical center in ramat gan, israel, saturday, june 8, 2024. israel says it has rescued four hostages in gaza who were kidnapped in a hamas led attack on oct. 7. (ap photo/tomer appelbaum)(ap photo/tomer appelbaum) andrey kozlov, 27, kidnapped from israel in a hamas led attack on oct. 7, 2023, arrives by helicopter to the sheba medical center in ramat gan, israel, saturday, june 8, 2024. israel says it has rescued four hostages in gaza who were kidnapped in a hamas led attack on oct. 7. (ap photo/tomer appelbaum)(ap photo/tomer appelbaum) deir al balah, gaza strip (ap)   at least 274 palestinians, including dozens of children, were killed, and hundreds more were wounded, in the israeli raid that rescued four hostages held by hamas, gaza’s health ministry said sunday. the israeli military said its forces came under heavy fire and responded during the complex daytime operation in central gaza. the killing of so many palestinians, in a raid that israelis celebrated as a stunning success, showed the heavy cost of such operations on top of the already soaring toll of the 8 month old war ignited by hamas’ oct. 7 attack. the israeli bombing was “hell,” witness mohamed al habash told the associated press. “we saw many fighter jets flying over the area. we saw people fleeing in the streets. women and children were screaming and crying.” the operation in nuseirat, a built up refugee camp dating to the 1948 arab israeli war, was the largest rescue since oct. 7, when hamas and other militants stormed across the border, killing about 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking about 250 hostage. israel’s massive offensive has killed over 36,700 palestinians, according to the health ministry, which does not differentiate between civilians and combatants in its count. it said 64 children and 57 women were killed in the latest raid, and 153 children and 161 women were among the nearly 700 wounded. saturday’s events also affected fragile attempts to deliver aid. the world food program chief said they suspended distribution around a u.s. built pier off gaza because “two of our warehouses, warehouse complex, were rocketed yesterday.” when asked how it happened and whether wfp shares its locations with israel’s military, cindy mccain said they did and “i don’t know. it’s a good question.” it wasn’t clear if she was referring to the rescue operation. in gaza, medics described scenes of chaos after the raid. overwhelmed hospitals were already struggling to treat the wounded from days of heavy israeli strikes. “we had the gamut of war wounds, trauma wounds, from amputations to eviscerations to trauma, to tbis (traumatic brain injuries), fractures and, obviously, big burns,” said karin huster of doctors without borders, which works in al aqsa martyrs hospital. “kids completely gray or white from the shock, burnt, screaming for their parents. many of them are not screaming because they are in shock.” the israeli military said it had attacked “threats to our forces in the area,” and that a special forces officer was killed in the operation. it said rescuers had come under heavy fire, including from gunmen firing rocket propelled grenades, and the military responded with heavy force, including from aircraft. israel’s foreign minister israel katz lashed out at critics of the operation in a post on x, saying “only israel’s enemies complained about the casualties of hamas terrorists and their accomplices.” inside israel, local media have focused heavily on the israeli toll, the hostages and military efforts with relatively little coverage of the situation for palestinians inside gaza. israelis continued to celebrate the return of noa argamani, 26; almog meir jan, 22; andrey kozlov, 27; and shlomi ziv, 41; as they reunited with loved ones. argamani’s mother, liora, who has late stage brain cancer, had released a video pleading to see her. argamani’s father told army radio the reunion was “very difficult” as liora was “just unable to express her feelings and could not say what she was really waiting to say.” meir jan’s aunt, dina, said his father had died friday, hours before the operation. “my brother died of grief,” she told israel’s kan public broadcaster. dr. itai pessach at sheba hospital said none had serious physical injuries. but they have lost friends and family, and staff “have been assisting them in rebuilding the infrastructure of their life,” he told reporters. about 120 hostages remain in gaza, with 43 pronounced dead, after about half were released in a weeklong cease fire in november. israeli troops have recovered the bodies of at least 16, according to the government. survivors include about 15 women, two children under 5 and two men in their 80s. scores of hostages are believed to be held in densely populated areas or inside hamas’ labyrinth of tunnels, making rescues complex and risky. a raid in february freed two hostages while leaving 74 palestinians dead. israel’s military has acknowledged it can’t carry out operations to rescue everyone. divisions have deepened in israel over the best way to bring hostages home. many urge prime minister benjamin netanyahu to embrace a cease fire deal u.s. president joe biden announced last month, but far right allies threaten to collapse his government if he does. hours after the rescue, thousands of israelis again gathered to protest the government and call for a deal. on sunday, benny gantz, a popular centrist member of israel’s three member war cabinet, resigned from the government after challenging it to adopt a new plan for the war. the resignation makes netanyahu more heavily reliant on his far right allies. also sunday, the commander of the israeli military’s gaza division resigned over failures that led to the oct. 7 attack. u.s. secretary of state antony blinken will return to the middle east this week, seeking a breakthrough in cease fire efforts. u.s. national security adviser jake sullivan told cnn that mediators egypt and qatar had not received official word from hamas on the proposed deal. in a separate interview with cbs, sullivan didn’t say whether biden would meet netanyahu when he comes to washington next month to address congress. international pressure is mounting on israel to limit civilian bloodshed in its war in gaza. palestinians also face widespread hunger because fighting and israeli restrictions have largely cut off the flow of aid. “they killed everything inside us,” said one nuseirat resident who witnessed saturday’s assault. the woman, identified only as mounira in a video shared by the u.n. on sunday, urged a cease fire. magdy reported from cairo. follow ap’s coverage of the war in gaza at https://apnews.com/hub/israel hamas war copyright 2025 the associated press. all rights reserved.

the israeli military rescued four hostages in a special operation in the nuseirat refugee camp, central gaza, that gazan authorities said killed 236 people and injured more than 400 others. noa argamani, almog meir jan, andrey kozlov, and shlomi ziv, were rescued by the israeli military, intelligence and special forces from two separate locations in nuseirat, the israel defense forces (idf) said saturday. all four were kidnapped from the nova music festival on october 7. “they are in good medical condition and have been transferred to the ‘sheba’ tel hashomer medical center for further medical examinations,” the idf added. an israeli policeman from a special counter terrorism unit was killed in saturday’s rescue operation, according to israeli police. news of the rescue came soon after israel’s military said it was operating in nuseirat and other areas of central gaza, where heavy shelling and artillery fire was reported. at least 236 people have been killed as a result of the rescue operation and more than 400 injured, hospital officials in gaza said saturday. the killed and wounded were taken to two hospitals in gaza, al awda hospital in nuseirat and al aqsa martyrs hospital in deir al balah. al awda hospital director dr marwan abu nasser told cnn that 142 bodies had been counted at the medical facility by late saturday, while al aqsa hospital in deir al balah said 94 bodies had been counted. cnn has no way of verifying casualty numbers reported by palestinian officials in gaza. medical records in the war torn enclave do not differentiate between civilians and militants killed. an israeli military spokesperson put the number of casualties from the operation at “under 100,” and had no information on how many of those were civilians. rear admiral daniel hagari said israeli forces had to enter civilian areas to reach hostages as this was where hamas had embedded itself. he said the hostages had been locked in two separate apartments in civilian multi story buildings about 200 meters (650 feet) apart, with argamani held in a different building to the three males. he said the idf had received intelligence on their location beforehand, noting that hostages in gaza were frequently moved around and argamani had previously been held elsewhere. similar raids had been called off at the last minute “more than three or four times” due to unfavorable conditions, he added. the first phase of saturday’s operation saw the idf target militant infrastructure with pre planned strikes, hagari said. for the rescue, the idf had opted for a daytime operation because of the element of surprise, he added, and it had prepared by building models of the apartments the hostages were held in. hagari said that the idf had come under intense fire, especially after withdrawing from the apartments, but did not provide evidence for his claims. saturday was an “emotional and happy day for the state of israel and the idf,” hagari said, though he cautioned that most of the remaining hostages were not being held in conditions that would allow for similar operations. following saturday’s announcement, the total number of hostages still held in the gaza strip from october 7 is now 116, of which at least 41 are dead. on the ground in gaza, locals described scenes of carnage following the strikes that led up to the rescue. nidal abdo, was shopping in nuseirat on saturday when he described a “crazy bombardment” hitting. “[it was] something we never witnessed before, maybe 150 rockets fell in less than 10 minutes, while we were running away more fell on the market,” he said. “there are children torn apart and scattered in the streets, they wiped out nuseirat, it is hell on earth,” he said. another local, abu abdallah, said the strike hit while people were sleeping, adding: “dogs were eating people’s remains. we pulled out six martyrs, all torn up children and women, we risked our lives to get them to the hospital.” footage from al aqsa martyrs hospital shows trucks and ambulances transferring injured people and bodies to the hospital. inside the hospital, people can be seen waiting on the floor. graphic video shows many palestinians, including children, injured with blood on their faces and clothes. footage from the hospital also shows people screaming and crying, huddled over bodies covered in blankets. hamas described the operation as a “brutal crime, devoid of the values of civilization and humanity,” saying the israeli military “committed a horrific massacre against innocent civilians.” hamas said the rescue would not change israel’s “strategic failure in the gaza strip,” as the group still holds a large number of other hostages after eight months of fighting. the group’s leader ismail haniyeh said, “our people will not surrender, and the resistance will continue to defend our rights in the face of this criminal enemy.” abu obaida, the spokesman for the group’s armed wing, the al qassam brigades, also claimed some hostages had been killed during the rescue mission, but provided no proof and did not elaborate on the identities of who had purportedly died. in a post on telegram, he said the rescue raid “posed a great danger” to the remaining hostages and “will have a devastating impact on their conditions and lives.” asked about the claim, the israel defense forces said, “hamas is a terrorist organization that uses psychological terrorism in order to achieve its goals, accordingly its statements should be taken with limited credibility.” hostage rescues are rare: this is only the third such successful operation. idf corporal ori megidish was rescued in october last year from the northern gaza strip. in another operation on february 12 this year, fernando marman and louis har were rescued from southern rafah. one of the rescued group, 25 year old noa argamani, became one of the symbols of the october 7 attacks, after video emerged of her shouting and pleading from the seat of a motorbike as a group of hamas fighters drives away with her in tow. in the video, argamani’s boyfriend, fellow israeli citizen avinatan or, is also led away by hamas fighters. noa’s mother liora argamani is a chinese citizen who has been grappling with late stage brain cancer. in a video released last november, she made a desperate plea to be able to see her daughter one more time. related video former biden officials explain why they are working to get him to change us policy in gaza “i don’t know how long i have left. i wish for the chance to see my noa at home,” her mother said, calling on us president joe biden to push for her daughter’s release. a spokesperson for ichilov hospital in tel aviv confirmed on saturday that argamani had been transferred there so that she could be treated alongside her mother. argamani’s family had previously received signs that she was still alive. she appeared in a series of hamas propaganda videos released in january this year. video showed argamani embracing her father after her release. she also held a phone call with israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu who told her “we didn’t give up on you for a moment.” of the others freed:   almog meir jan, 22, is from the small city of or yehuda, outside tel aviv. he was due to start a new job at a technology company on october 8.   shlomi ziv, 41, was working as a security guard at the nova festival when he was kidnapped on october 7. ziv had been living in the local moshav or agricultural settlement for 17 years with his wife miren.   andrey kozlov, 27, is a russian citizen who move to israel a year ago. he was also working as a security guard at the nova festival. relatives of the rescued hostages said they felt happy and blessed to be reunited with their loved ones but also called on the israeli government to bring back the remaining captives. “i couldn’t stop hugging him,” orit meir, mother of almog meir jan, told a news conference saturday. “tomorrow is my birthday so i got my present.” meir thanked the israeli military and government for the rescue, but also urged the government to secure the release of the dozens of captives that remained in gaza. “we want a deal now. we want them to come back home as soon as possible,” she said. jennifer master, the girlfriend of andrey kozlov, echoed those sentiments, saying, “thank you for saving our loved ones. and we wish that all the loved ones will come back home safe and sound and there will be a deal soon.” yaakov argamani, father of noa argamani, added: “we can’t forget there are 120 hostages. we must do everything, but everything, as soon as possible to bring them home, so that their families can embrace them in happiness.” rozi ziv, mother of shlomi ziv, said, “my dream came true. i wish for the other hostages that their dreams will come true, too.” meanwhile, following news of the rescue, thousands of demonstrators gathered across israel, calling on the government to secure a deal to free the remaining hostages. in tel aviv, demonstrators gathered at a plaza informally known as hostages square, many holding up pictures of the hostages with signs that read, “bring them home now.” earlier, the crowd cheered the israeli military for its rescue operation. many are calling for new elections, calling for netanyahu’s government to step down. this is a developing story and will be updated. © 2025 cable news network. a warner bros. discovery company. all rights reserved. cnn sans ™ & © 2016 cable news network.

this page is subject to the extended confirmed restriction related to the arab israeli conflict. october 7 hamas led attack on israelmilitary engagements civilian attacks israeli invasion of the gaza stripmilitary engagements civilian attacks impacts and repercussions other theatersred sea crisis attacks on u.s. bases in iraq, syria, and jordan israel hezbollah conflict iran israel proxy conflict assassinations and deaths of prominent individuals see also on 7 october 2023, as part of the hamas led attack on israel at the beginning of the gaza war, hamas and other palestinian militant groups abducted 251 people from israel to the gaza strip,[2][3][4] including children,[5] women, and elderly people.[6][7] almost half of the hostages are foreign nationals or have multiple citizenships,[8] and some hostages were negev bedouins.[9] the captives are likely being held in different locations in the gaza strip.[10] of all the hostages presumed alive in october 2024, 53 were civilians and 11 were military personnel according to afp.[11] as of 8 february 2025, 138 hostages had been returned alive to israel, with 105 released in a 2023 prisoner exchange deal, four released by hamas unilaterally, eight rescued by the israel defense forces (idf) and 21 released in a 2025 prisoner exchange deal.[12][13] 39 bodies of hostages were repatriated to israel, with three of the hostages killed by friendly fire after escaping captivity and being mistaken for enemy fighters by idf troops[14][15] and the bodies of 36 other hostages repatriated through military operations.[a][16][17] 74 hostages were reportedly killed on october 7 or in hamas captivity according to israel.[18][19][20] 76 hostages remained in captivity in the gaza strip, 73 of whom had been abducted on 7 october 2023, and the other three hostages captured earlier. based on intelligence, the idf has concluded that at least 34 of the remaining hostages are dead.[21][19][22][23] at the start of the war, hamas offered to release all hostages in exchange for israel releasing all palestinian prisoners.[24] by october 2023, israel held 5,200 palestinians, including 170 children, in its prisons.[25] several countries have been involved in negotiations between israel and hamas, with qatar taking the lead.[26] on 22 november 2023, israel and hamas agreed to the release of 150 palestinian prisoners and a four day cease fire in exchange for hamas's release of approximately 50 of the hostages. the exchange involved hostages from the categories of women and children.[27][28][29] as of 30 november 2023[update], the last day of the ceasefire, 105 civilian hostages had been released, which included 81 people from israel, 23 thais and one filipino.[12] on 12 february 2024, two argentinian israeli civilians were rescued in operation golden hand. on 2 september 2024, hamas released statements which strongly insinuated that they now had a new policy of killing any hostage that the idf attempted to rescue with military force, as opposed to a pause in fighting that allows for peaceful release of hostages.[30][31] on 15 january 2025, it was announced that a hostage return agreement had been reached between hamas and israel, under which hamas will release 33 out of 98 hostages in the first phase, including infants, children, women, and elderly men, as well as younger men with injuries or health issues.[32] in exchange, israel is set to release more than a 1000 palestinians being held in israeli prisons.[33] the issue of hostages and prisoners is considered emotional for both israelis and palestinians.[25] since 1967, between 750,000 and 1 million palestinians have been arrested by israel.[34][25][35] as of october 2023, israel held 5,200 palestinian prisoners,[36] including 170 children.[25] (by november 2023, the number of palestinian prisoners, including suspected militants and gazans had increased to 10,000.[37]). some have been convicted on terrorism related charges.[38] un special rapporteur francesca albanese described many convictions as resulting from "a litany of violations of international law, including due process violations, that taint the legitimacy of the administration of justice by the occupying power."[39] about 1,310 palestinians are held in administrative detention, a practice that allows israel to detain palestinians indefinitely without charges or trial.[40] israel justifies this practice citing security reasons.[41] hamas has used hostages as bargaining chips for prisoner exchanges,[42] which is a violation of international law.[43] hostage taking and the abduction of civilians are prohibited by international law and are war crimes.[44][45] israel had mostly refrained from negotiating with organizations it deemed as terrorists, opting for military or alternative measures to secure the release of hostages.[42][46] however, israel has engaged in prisoner exchanges with armed groups on several occasions.[47] notable incidents include the 1994 abduction of israeli soldier nachshon wachsman by hamas, resulting in his death during a failed rescue attempt by idf forces.[48][49] hamas actions were at times aimed at disrupting the peace process in the 1990s.[48] in 2006, israeli soldier gilad shalit was captured and held for over five years until a prisoner exchange in 2011. israel secured his release in exchange for 1,000 palestinians from israeli custody, some of whom were trialed as terrorists.[4][34] the 2014 kidnapping and murder of three israeli teenagers, eyal yifrach, naftali fraenkel, and gilad shaar, heightened tensions and contributed to opening of operation protective edge in 2014.[50][51] hamas has also held the bodies of two slain israeli soldiers, hadar goldin and oron shaul, since the 2014 operation protective edge.[52][53] additionally, at the time of its attack, hamas was already holding two israelis hostage: ethiopian israeli avera mengistu (since 2014) and bedouin israeli hisham al sayed (since 2015). on 31 august 2023, israel warned its citizens that hamas was trying to kidnap them.[54] on 7 october 2023, hamas attacked israel, initiating the gaza war. the attack resulted in hundreds of israeli casualties, leading to widespread condemnation and accusations of war crimes.[55][42] the use of hostages, primarily women, children, and the elderly, is highlighted as a violation by hamas of international humanitarian law.[56] on the morning of 7 october 2023, around 6:30 a.m. ist, around 6,000 palestinians including 3,800 from the hamas "elite nukhba forces" launched an attack into israel from 119 sites on its border with the gaza strip.[57][58] the operation included attacks on israel defense forces (idf) bases as well as massacres of israeli civilians. the ground incursion was combined with a sustained barrage of at least 4,300 of rockets.[59][57][58] at around 7:00 am, militants raided many communities and kibbutzim (intentional communities) in the gaza periphery area of israel. they killed civilians and soldiers across many communities resulting in 1,200 deaths.[60][61][62] the economist described the combined attacks as "the biggest terror attack in [israel's] history".[62] in the initial wave of attacks, militants kidnapped civilians and brought them back to gaza as captives.[4][7][63] according to statements by hamas and palestinian islamic jihad, around 200 soldiers and civilians were captured or abducted during the raid on the gaza periphery communities.[64][65] rear admiral daniel hagari, an idf spokesperson, reported on 7 october that military officers were among those captured.[66] israel confirmed the identity of 203 captives, among them 30 children,[67] while gaza spokespeople reported holding roughly 200, estimating that another 50 were held by other factions.[68] the idf reported that it captured "handbooks" made by hamas to instruct its militants; these handbooks instructed to "kill the difficult" captives, and use the rest as human shields.[69] the un's pramila patten and commission of inquiry was unable to substantiate these claims.[70] civilians believed to be held captive in gaza include families, children, festival goers, peace activists, caregivers, and older adults.[71] such as 75 year old historian alex danzig who has written books on poland's jewish community and the holocaust,[72][7] and the bibas family were taken from their home, including an infant and 4 year old were taken from nir oz.[73][74] while many hostages had only israeli citizenship, about half of the hostages are foreign nationals or have multiple citizenships. some of these hostages hold citizenship from france, germany, russia, united kingdom, and the united states.[26][75] israel hosts a large number of international workers for agriculture work, with some workers also being kidnapped and held hostage. at least seventeen thai citizens working in greenhouses in the gaza periphery were also kidnapped.[26][75][76] one citizen of nepal, bipin joshi, was confirmed to be abducted from kibbutz alumim.[77] two filipinos were abducted and later released during the ceasefire.[78] hamas also took members of the negev bedouin arab community as hostages.[9] there is a video depicting at least 64 of the abductees.[79] video analysis from the washington post shows that some of the captives were killed shortly after their capture.[80] images taken by the associated press also showed yaffa adar being kidnapped.[63] on 19 november 2023, the israeli military released reported cctv footage that they claim shows hostages being led into al shifa hospital on 7 october. this was in the wake of israel being put under pressure to substantiate claims that hamas was operating an expansive command center under the hospital leading to its siege. however, shortly after the release bbc news indicated that they were unable to independently corroborate the claims and is not the evidence that israel claimed to have.[81] as part of israel's counteroffensive, israel implemented a "total blockade" of the gaza strip until the hostages have been released.[82] amnesty international describes this measure as having been "taken to punish civilians in gaza for the actions of palestinian armed groups," amounting to collective punishment.[83] israel has also undertaken mass detentions of palestinians in israel and the palestinian territories; several israeli ngos described the detention of several thousand gazan workers as a form of retaliation or "vengeance" for the capture of israeli citizens.[84][85][86] american israeli author robby berman set up a fund offering a reward of 1 million israeli shekels for the release of hostages in gaza, specifically aimed at encouraging palestinians to aid in the rescue of jewish prisoners.[87] experts stated that an israeli ground invasion of the gaza strip would endanger the lives of the hostages.[88] u.s. officials said the biden administration advised israel to delay the ground invasion of gaza to allow more time for hostage negotiations.[89] according to israeli officials, once israel begins a ground invasion of gaza, it will be almost impossible to reach a deal on the release of the hostages.[90] on 24 october, us president joe biden rejected calls for a ceasefire, stating "we should have those hostages released and then we can talk".[91] on 22 october 2023, a list of the 204 hostages was published.[92] according to israel, at least 250 additional individuals were captured on the first day of the war, but rescued that day.[93][94] as of 6 june 2024, hamas refuses to allow representatives of the international committee of the red cross to meet with the 7 october hostages in gaza.[95][96][97] the hostages are believed to have been dispersed among different hamas members and factions, as well as among other militant groups, gangs and families.[98] on october 10, 2023, the spokesperson for hamas’s military wing abu obaida broadcast a message on al jazeera that hamas would not consider any hostage negotiations unless israel ceased any military effort to respond to hamas attacks.[99] in a reconstruction of the negotiations, franklin foer has written that by october 13, 2023, the emir of qatar, tamim bin hamad al thani in a discussion with antony blinken, said that hamas had succeeded far beyond its expectations in taking far more hostages than it could manage, and was disposed to release some in exchange for a pause in israeli airstrikes. qatar had conveyed this readiness to israel, without succeeding in getting the israelis to focus on the proposal. attempts by the americans to follow up on this possibility only met with an israeli unwillingness to explore the option.[100] in november 2023, hamas offered a deal dubbed as "everyone for everyone" or "all for all"   a release of all hostages being held in gaza in exchange for israel releasing thousands of palestinians in israeli prisons.[101][24] some israeli families have spoken in support for such a deal.[102][103] shortly after the october attacks thailand had been in official talks with hamas with a group convened by the countries parliamentary speaker wan muhamad noor matha about the release of their citizens. the group conveyed to hamas that the citizens were not party to the conflict, but instead part of the around 30,000 thai laborers who work in the israeli agriculture sectors. while some had been captured about 39 were killed in the attacks and about 8,600 repatriated back to thailand.[104][105] on 8 november, hamas sources told news agencies that hamas could release 10 15 hostages in exchange for a three day humanitarian pause in fighting.[101] on 9 nov, benjamin netanyahu had reportedly rejected such an exchange.[106] on 13 november it was reported that hamas had told qatari mediators that the group was willing to release up to 70 women and children hostages held in gaza for a five day truce and the release of 275 women and children held by israel.[107] on 9 november, al quds brigades released a video where spokesperson abu hamza states that they are prepared for the unconditional release of 77 year old hanna katzir, citing humanitarian reasons and their inability to provide her with her specific medical needs, as well as the release of 13 year old yagil yaakov. israel refused the offer, claiming it would play into the captor's "psychological terror".[108] on 21 november, it was erroneously reported that katsir had died from medical complications, however she was still alive and was released on 24 november.[109] yagil yaakov, alongside his older brother, were released on 27 november.[110] on 22 november it was announced that israel and hamas had reached an agreement about a cease fire and the release of 50 hostages. while hostages held by hamas would not be released until 23 november at the earliest, those released would be woman and children, in response the israeli government would release 150 palestinian prisoners, more aid would be allowed into gaza and a four day cease fire which would be added onto for every 10 additional hostages released. hamas has acknowledged that of the hostages released children would be the main component of the hostages released, and the idf has planned that an idf officer would be on hand to facilitate the crossing and handover with the hostages being transferred into israel for medical care.[111][112] as of 26 november, hamas had released a total of 58 hostages since the ceasefire went into effect, some of whom were foreign nationals and not included in the agreement to release 50 israelis.[113][114] in april 2024 it was reported that a senior hamas official stated that the group did not have 40 living hostages in gaza that met the criteria for an exchange under a proposed cease fire that was being negotiated. negotiators had proposed an initial six week cease fire in which hamas would have released held hostages in waves, with a primary group of 40 to consist of women, older people, ill hostages and five female idf troops, with israel releasing palestinians held in israeli prisons among other demands.[115] a captured idf private was freed on 30 october in an operation headed by the idf, with assistance from shin bet and mossad.[116][117] on 8 december, hamas claimed they repelled an attempted hostage rescue by israeli special forces, inflicting several military casualties.[118] hamas also said that a hostage named sahar baruch died in the incident.[119] on the same day of 8 december, according to an idf statement, two israeli soldiers were wounded in a failed hostage rescue attempt.[120] it is unclear whether the statements of hamas and the idf refer to the same event.[119] during the early morning of 12 february 2024, the idf, shin bet and special police forces coupled with airstrikes, rescued two hostages with dual israel argentinian nationality, 60 year old fernando simon marman and 70 year old louis har, who were kidnapped from kibbutz nir yitzhak on 7 october by hamas, from a building in rafah in southern gaza. one israeli soldier was injured and 37 hamas militants, including the hostages' guards, were reported killed during the rescue operation.[121][122] in may 2024, it was reported that based on idf interrogations of detained reported members of hamas in gaza an overnight operation led to the recovery of the bodies of four people killed on october 7, near the site of the re'im music festival massacre.[123][124] on 31 may 2024, the idf withdrew from jabalia after a weeks long operation, during which troops recovered the bodies of seven israeli hostages.[125] on 8 june 2024 four hostages who had been abducted during the re'im music festival massacre were rescued from two separate areas in the nuseirat refugee camp by members of the yamam, the shin bet and the idf. airstrike cover for the operation and resulting firefights reportedly caused the deaths of over 200 palestinians per the gaza health ministry, while israel claims only 100 palestinians were killed.[126] on 19 january 2025 it was publicized that israeli troops have recovered oron shaul's body.[127] the operation to recover the body was carried out jointly by the idf and the shin bet security agency, with several special forces units including the navy’s shayetet 13 commando unit and another elite force in the military intelligence directorate. the idf did not reveal when exactly the operation took place, nor where in the gaza strip they found the body. shaul’s body was brought back to israel and taken to the abu kabir forensic institute where it was identified. he was buried at a cemetery in poria illit with president isaac herzog delivering a eulogy. on 20 october, hamas released two american hostages for humanitarian reasons and in response to qatari and us pressure.[128][129] the international committee of the red cross (icrc) said it helped facilitate the release of the hostages by transporting them from gaza to israel.[129] on 23 october, hamas released two israeli women hostages, aged 79 and 85, for humanitarian reasons after mediation by qatar and egypt. the icrc helped transport them out of gaza. the released hostages were from the nir oz kibbutz.[26][130] one of the released hostages, yocheved lifshitz, and her husband oded, a journalist still in captivity, are known peace activists that helped palestinians in gaza get to hospitals in israel.[130][131] lifshitz's daughter sharone said that lifshitz and other hostages were held in a "huge network" of tunnels. lifshitz was critical of both the shin bet and the idf, and the press conference was criticized as a pr disaster for israel.[132][133] on 27 october, a hamas official said that hamas could not release the hostages taken during the attack on israel until a ceasefire is agreed.[134][135] on 22 november, israel and hamas agreed to the release 150 of palestinian prisoners and a four day cease fire in exchange for hamas's release of approximately 50 of the hostages.[27] on 24 november, the release of 50 women and children hostages by hamas over a four day period began after negotiations with israel, with hostages being released into the care of the red cross through the rafah border crossing and then to the israeli hatzerim military base. some of this group were dual and foreign nationals, with individuals from israel, thailand, and the philippines counted in the first group released.[27][136] as of 26 november 2023, a total of 41 hostages had been released by hamas during the four day ceasefire.[13] of those released, 26 were israeli (some being dual citizens) with a breakdown of 13 released on 24 november and 13 on 25 november.[114] in addition, 14 thai hostages and one filipino were released as part of a separate deal.[114] an additional 17 hostages (including 14 israelis and one american) were released on 26 november, in exchange for 39 palestinian prisoners.[137] israel published a list of 300 palestinian prisoners that it would potentially release in exchange for israeli hostages in gaza, 287 of which are children below the age of 18.[138] an analysis by nbc news of the list showed about 20% were convicted of a crime, while the roughly 80% of the list were not convicted of any crimes and had either not been prosecuted or had been detained under administrative detention.[139] however, some of the palestinians prisoners that were freed as part of the deal had been convicted of offenses ranging from attempted murder, to less severe ones such as inflicting property damage, hindering police work or assembling unlawfully. other offenses included assault of police officers, rock throwing, hurling firebombs, arson, and possession of firearms or explosives. some prisoners reportedly belonged to hamas, palestinian islamic jihad and pflp.[140] a russian israeli man was released on 26 november outside of the cease fire agreement. musa abu marzouk, an official within hamas indicated that the release was in appreciation for president vladimir putin's position. putin has been openly critical of the israeli operation in regards to gaza and the mounting casualties.[141] the idf confirmed on 13 october that remains of missing israeli people were located and retrieved in the gaza strip.[142] on 14 october, hamas stated that nine hostages had been killed over a 24 hour period due to israeli airstrikes.[143] on 4 november, hamas reported that 60 hostages had died as a result of israel's bombing of gaza.[144] an israeli official responded that "regardless of what hamas claims, any harm done to hostages is hamas's responsibility and they will be held accountable."[145] according to the idf, half of the hostages were killed during the abduction or died in captivity.[146][147] at least two bodies of deceased hostages have been recovered, as of 16 november.[148] along with reported cctv footage released on 19 november, israel announced that an idf soldier who had been captured on 7 october had been killed by hamas while being held at the al shifa hospital. hamas denied this and indicated the soldier had been previously reported by them as being killed by an israeli airstrike on 9 november.[81] on 29 november, hamas claimed that the youngest hostage; a 10 month old toddler and his 4 year old brother and mother were killed while in captivity due to israeli bombings. the claim is being investigated by the idf and other agencies, and israeli officials have stated the account shows the "barbarism and cruelty of hamas".[149] hamas released a video of the dead body of arie zalmanovich, 86, from kibbutz nir oz. he had been wounded during the october 7 attack and assaulted by bystanders in gaza as he was driven on a motorcycle by his captors.[150] according to hamas he died of a heart attack.[151] zalmanovich had medical conditions and required medical treatment.[152] his son attributed the death to the lack of medicines and suitable food in captivity.[153] on 15 december, the idf stated that during operations in shuja'iyya, they "mistakenly identified three israeli hostages as a threat" and killed them via friendly fire.[154] the three hostages were three men in their 20s, who were identified after having their bodies returned to israel.[154][14][155] according to an israeli military official on 16 december, the three hostages were shirtless and "they have a stick with a white cloth on it. the [israeli] soldier feels threatened and opens fire. he declares that they're terrorists"; more israeli forces shoot, killing two hostages "immediately" and wounding the third hostage, who appealed for help in hebrew, then "there's another burst of fire [by israeli forces] towards the third [hostage] and he also dies".[156] haaretz reported that the third hostage retreated into a building after the other two hostages were shot, with idf soldiers following the third hostage and shooting him dead because they thought he was a terrorist setting a trap.[157] yediot ahronot reported that israeli soldiers had called for the third hostage to come out of the building he was hiding in, and then shot him when he reappeared.[158] the israeli military investigated the killings and concluded on 28 december that the israeli "soldiers carried out the right action to the best of their understanding of the event at that moment".[159] in february 2024, it was announced that through a confidential assessment conducted by israeli intelligence officials, there were more deceased hostages than previously known. in the report thirty two of the hostages held in gaza were declared as deceased, with an additional twenty hostages status still undetermined.[160] on 24 april 2024, hamas had released a two minute video of hersch goldberg polin in which he stated the need for the israeli government to bring him home as well as that 70 of the 130 hostages have been killed in israeli bombings. he also stated in the video that he was living in an "underground hell without water, food, sun or medical treatment".[161] on 31 august 2024, hersh goldberg polin's body was among six recovered from a hamas tunnel in rafah, gaza. according to the israeli health ministry, all six were executed by their hamas captors from "close range" 1 2 days earlier. the idf said that the captors were not present when its soldiers recovered the bodies.[162][163] hamas denied executing goldberg polin, as well as the five other hostages, stating they died in an israeli airstrike.[164] on 2 september, hamas announced that since june, they had implemented new instructions for managing hostages in the event of approaching israeli forces in gaza. abu obaida, the spokesperson for hamas' al qassam brigades, did not disclose specific details but criticized israeli prime minister netanyahu's insistence on using military pressure to free prisoners instead of negotiating a deal.[30][31] many hostages require medical treatment due to their medical conditions (such as parkinson's, cardiovascular diseases, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and cancer), according to a report sent to the icrc on 15 october by hagai levine, a public health physician and epidemiologist who heads the medical and resilience team of the hostages and missing families forum.[165] as of 5 december 2023, hamas refuses to grant the icrc access to the hostages.[96][166][97] on 13 october, hamas released a video purporting to demonstrate its compassion towards abducted children. the video shows armed hamas militants patting children on the back, rocking children in a stroller, and giving a child water.[167] on 16 october, hamas released a video of a 21 year old french israeli woman pleading to be returned to her family, while someone bandages her injured arm and a scar is visible.[168] a released hostage, who was a nurse, was moved throughout her captivity to treat other hostages and could ask for specific medicines. although she has alleged the medicines were often in insufficient amounts.[169] israel's health ministry found that the released hostages lost an average of 17 33 pounds (≈8 15 kilograms) in seven weeks, and they said their diet in captivity was minimal.[170] gilat livni, a pediatrician and consultant in infectious diseases who worked with some of the returned children at schneider's children's hospital, stated that they were in "generally good condition" but raised caution about the trauma that was faced. a physician advising the families of held hostages also echoed this statement, warning of the trauma faced and the long process of restoring a sense of trust and control after being released.[171] renana eitan, the head of psychiatry at the ichilov tel aviv medical centre, said that among the freed hostages she examined were children drugged by their captors, including with ketamine, and were suffering from withdrawal.[172] israel's health ministry’s confirmed that before they were released, liberated hostages were given psychoactive pills by their captors. blood tests showed the drug was clonazepam, commonly used to treat epilepsy, anxiety, ocd and other cases on a short term basis.[173] hamas reportedly aimed to make the hostages appear calm and happy after enduring prolonged physical abuse, deprivation, and psychological terror in captivity.[174][175] dror mendel, director of the dana dwek children's hospital, described orthopedic injuries, scarring and burns, and "very low hygiene standards... lice, rashes, skin irritation [and] inflammation". prof. ronit lubetzky, director of the pediatrics department, stated that some of the children have lost as much as 10 kg of body weight.[176] prof. itay pesach, director of the edmond and lily safra children's hospital, said that patients describe "the entire range of abuse you could dream of... not different from the testimonies of people who came back from the ghetto or concentration camp".[176] levine spoke on the lacking medical care given to the hostages, physical and psychological abuse, and starvation: "at first there was an implicit assumption that the conditions of captivity by hamas are reasonable. this assumption no longer exists... the situations is terrible... there's no time. the clock of some [of the hostages] is already ticking."[177] a doctor[who?] who treated some of the 110 hostages released from captivity told the associated press that at least ten male and female hostages of them were sexually assaulted or abused. he declined to give his name or speak on any further details, claiming to protect the hostages identities.[178] a former idf mental health officer said returning hostages who have experienced continual psychological trauma will be very cautious about saying anything that endangers other captives. she also stated returning hostages can have "black holes in their memory" and can also express sympathy for their captors due to "stockholm syndrome".[179][better source needed] many hostages told relatives that they were totally isolated from the outside world and had no information about their family members, who in many cases[180] were also kidnapped or killed in the attack.[181] yaniv yaacov, the uncle of hostages, said in an event in north macedonia with the israeli foreign minister that his two nephews were branded using the exhaust pipe of a motorcycle by hamas. he alleged it was done so that if they escaped they could be detected through the burn. he also said his nephews were drugged.[182] hostages released by hamas later relayed their experiences in captivity, either firsthand, via family members, or through a report from the united nations:[183][184] israeli student noa argamani, who was at the trance party near re'im, was kidnapped while with her partner avinathan or.[7][214] they were filmed being taken by the militants to gaza, after whatsapp messages they sent asking for help from their hiding place from 8:10 a.m. were exposed. the footage showed argamani being taken on a motorcycle while reaching out for or, who was led away by his captors on foot.[215] argamani was rescued along with three other hostages on 8 june 2024.[216] militants abducted the bibas family from kibbutz nir oz during the nir oz massacre: 9 month old kfir, 4 year old ariel, 32 year old mother shiri, and her 34 year old husband yarden.[217][218] shiri's parents, also abducted from their kibbutz, were later found deceased. efforts to release shiri and her children during the ceasefire between israel and hamas were unsuccessful, leading to claims by hamas that they were killed in an israeli airstrike. the idf expressed doubts about these claims, amidst widespread concern and a campaign for their release.[219][220] on february 1, 2025 yarden bibas was released during the 2025 ceasefire and prisoner exchange, the status of his wife and children were undetermined at the time of his release.[221] 23 year old american israeli hersh goldberg polin was abducted by hamas during the re'im music festival massacre. during the festival, hersh took refuge in a field shelter. his friend aner shapira died while repelling grenade attacks, and hersh lost an arm before being abducted. his mother, rachel goldberg, has since been vocal in international and diplomatic arenas, including the united nations and the march for israel in washington, d.c., campaigning for his release and demanding humanitarian intervention.[222][223][224] he was held hostage for almost 11 months, until his body was recovered from a tunnel in rafah in the gaza strip on 31 august 2024.[225][226] it was later reported by the israeli government that goldberg polin and five other hostages with him were killed by hamas, shot from "close range" 1 2 days before their bodies were found. their killings sparked nation wide protests in israel about the continuation of the hostage crisis.[227][228] naama levy, a 19 year old female conscript doing her military service, was abducted by hamas militants, during the attack on the nahal oz kibbutz military base. footage released by hamas showed levy with multiple visible injuries, including injuries to her ankles and a large bloodstain on the seat of her gray sweatpants, which led to widespread concern that she had been raped or sexually assaulted.[229][230] on 24 january 2025 it was announced that levy would be a part of the 2025 cease fire and hostage exchange process; she was released on the following day.[231] yarden roman gat, a 36 year old woman who is a dual national of germany and israel, along with her husband alon and their 3 year old daughter gefen, were abducted by hamas militants from their home in kibbutz be'eri during the be'eri massacre and taken towards the gaza strip border. yarden's act of self sacrifice in saving her daughter during an escape attempt, and her subsequent two month long captivity in gaza, garnered significant attention until her release on 29 november.[232][233] on 16 october 2023, hamas leader ismail haniyeh and turkey's foreign minister hakan fidan discussed the possibility of releasing the hostages taken during the hamas attack on israel.[234] in a video released by hamas, three female hostages are shown. one of the women speaks, and lays the blame for their continued situation on the israeli government and israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu. she chides the israeli government's bombing campaign, asking if they wanted all the hostages killed, and asks for the release of all palestinian prisoners held by israel.[235] a poll by the israeli newspaper maariv, conducted on 18 19 october, found that 65% of israelis supported a ground invasion of the gaza strip and 21% opposed it.[236] in comparison, according to a poll conducted for the same newspaper on 25 26 october, only 29% of israelis supported an immediate large scale ground offensive into the gaza strip. maariv said that "it is almost certain that the developments on the matter of the hostages, which is now topping the agenda, have had a great impact on this shift."[237] on 21 february 2024, finance minister bezalel smotrich stated the hostages' return "is not the most important thing".[238] in may 2024, orit strook, the minister of settlements and national missions, criticized a potential hostage deal, stating there are "soldiers who left everything behind and went out to fight for goals that the government defined, and we throw it in the trash to save 22 people or 33 or i don't know how many".[239] during a debate regarding the status and repatriation of bodies of deceased suspected and confirmed hamas militants in a june 2024 political security cabinet meeting, minister ben gvir stated the releasing of the bodies of militants limited israel's ability to use them as leverage to exchange for hostages or bodies of hostages.[240] human rights groups, international organizations, and families of those held captive have called for an immediate release of the hostages.[241] on sunday evening, 8 october, the families of the kidnapped and missing held a press conference, demanding the government open ongoing talks with the families and carry out an operation to bring the missing home, appoint someone to maintain ongoing contact with the families, immediately involve turkish president erdogan, saudi crown prince mohammed bin salman, and egyptian president abdel fattah el sisi, to release the captives.[242] the government appointed gal hirsch to be in charge of the issue.[243] on 26 october, the families of the hostages met with netanyahu.[244] the hostages and missing families forum, that represents families of the abducted people, complained that no one had explained "whether the ground operation endangers the well being of the 229 hostages".[245] the families also raised complaints that the government and netanyahu had failed to provide updates to the families or meet with them until the meeting on 26 october.[244] meirav gonen, a representative for the families, expressed support for a full prisoner swap, stating: "a deal of a return of our family members immediately in the framework of 'all for all' is feasible, and there will be wide national support for this."[37] according to one rabbi, alberto somekh, citing talmud gittin 45a, the mishnah affirms that ‘captives should not be redeemed for more than their value, to prevent abuses.’ the view has been cited as one where religious principles are interpreted in a way to support the netanyahu government’s widely criticized position.[246] on 14 november, it was reported that families of those held hostage began a five day long march to netanyahu's home in israel to demand action and answers. one family member was quoted as saying they did not feel like they were in good hands, and that they do not get enough information, while another called on the perceived in action of the israeli government.[247] on 2 december, at a rally outside the idf headquarters in tel aviv, israeli hostages released by hamas called for the immediate release of fellow hostages left behind.[248] on 4 december, eight released israeli hostages wrote a letter to the international committee of the red cross, asking the organization to provide medical assistance and to visit their relatives still being held by hamas in gaza.[249] the appeal was made due to reports, that the red cross was not allowed to visit the hostages since the beginning of the war, as for 29 november.[250] in an early december 2023 meeting with netanyahu and other members of the war cabinet, family members of those who are still held hostage by hamas forces showed their outrage and frustration with the continued situation. in a published recording, netanyahu can be heard blaming the end of the november 2023 cease fire on hamas while family members and supporters can be heard calling him a liar. some former hostages also attended the meeting and spoke about the conditions they were held in, which were exasperated by israeli airstrikes.[251] one unnamed freed hostage from the kibbutz nir oz told netanyahu: "every day in captivity was extremely challenging. we were in tunnels, terrified that it would not be hamas, but israel, that would kill us, and then they would say hamas killed you."[252][253] in january 2024, the mother of ron sherman, a deceased hostage whose body was recovered by the idf, accused the israeli military of killing her son by filling the tunnel he was in with poison gas.[254] (sherman was killed by an israeli airstrike on 12 december.[255]) about 20 relatives of hostages still held as captives by hamas stormed a knesset finance committee on 22 january, a day after netanyahu rejected new hamas conditions for ending the war and releasing the remaining hostages. many voiced their displeasure at the apparent lack of resolution in having the remaining hostages freed.[256][257] that same month, the group tsav 9 was created on facebook and grew to over 400 members of family members of those taken hostage. the group became active in disrupting the delivery of humanitarian aid into the gaza strip. the group actions have caused it to be characterized as a "violent extremist" group by the united states in june 2024.[258][259] after a "settlement brings security" (hebrew: התיישבות מביאה ביטחון, romanized: hitiashvút mevi’ávi takhón) conference was held in jerusalem on 28 january 2024, sponsored by the right wing nachala (israeli settler organization) pushing for resettlement of the gaza strip, many family members expressed their concerns about the conference in context of the crisis. it was strongly criticized for the festive atmosphere, for the movement's forming a perceived impediment to the hostages' release, and for its calls for coerced emigration of palestinians from their country. one family member stated of the conferencegoers "you're dancing on their blood".[260][261] a delegation of family members of israeli hostages, along with several dozen lawyers, went to the hague to file complaints against hamas leaders at the international criminal court, which is empowered to prosecute individuals for serious violations of the geneva conventions that amount to war crimes.[262] after israel's national security advisor tzachi hanegbi in may 2024 had a discussion with several relatives of the hostages, one relative told the media that hanegbi had indicated that israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu would only agree to a deal regarding the hostages if, according to the relative, "it's going to be politically good for [netanyahu], that if he sees polls that say that the israeli public wants to see the hostages home more than it wants the continuation of the war, then he will make a deal that will bring all the hostages home".[263][264] in early september 2024, hostage families stated that executives at channel 14 had told them a hostage deal would not happen because it would threaten netanyahu's coalition government.[265] on 7 september 2024, mass demonstrations were held in support of the liberation of hostages in exchange for a cease fire deal with hamas.[266] the organising groups estimated that 500,000 participated in the tel aviv protest, with 250,000 more at rallies around the country.[266] this made it the largest ever rally in israel after the 25 september 1982 street protest organised by peace now after the sabra and shatila massacre with an estimated 400,000 participants, c. 10% of israel's population,[267] and the 2023 israeli judicial reform protests.[268] on 16 october 2023, a report sent to the international committee of the red cross by the geneva based organization hostage and missing families forum medical team, headed by hagai levine, said hostages are "in urgent need of treatment and lifesaving medication" and are "prone to immediate mortality." the report also expressed concern about babies requiring infant formula.[269][270] on 25 october 2023, qatar's prime minister and foreign minister mohammed bin abdulrahman bin jassim al thani stated that there had been some progress in the hostage negotiations.[271] that same day, world health organization director general tedros adhanom ghebreyesus met with the hostages and missing families forum and said: there is an urgent need for the captors of the hostages to provide signs of life, proof of provision of health care and the immediate release, on humanitarian and health grounds, of all those abducted.[272] us state department spokesman, mathew miller suggested in response to a question about evidence of hamas sexual and gender based violence on 7 october, that the reason hamas was holding on to female israeli hostages was to prevent them from testifying about their experiences in hamas captivity.[273][274] in october 2024, a government building in tehran frequently used for displaying murals in both hebrew and persian was updated to feature a collage of photographs of hostages held by hamas, accompanied by the phrase "no hostages will be freed," shown in both languages.[275] 14 october 2023 9 november 2023 17 november 2023 haim rubinstein, official spokesperson for an israeli opposition leader (ofer shelah) and a member of the media team for an opposition party (yesh atid), served until april 2024 as the spokesman of the hostages and missing families forum representing the families of the hostages. rubinstein contradicted the above official contemporaneous public statement of the hamas military spokesperson by claiming six months later that his group "found out that hamas had offered on october 9 or 10 to release all the civilian hostages in exchange for the idf not entering the [gaza] strip, but the [israeli] government rejected the offer."allon, gideon (26 april 2024). "'no doubt' netanyahu preventing hostage deal, charges ex spokesman of families forum". the times of israel. retrieved 5 may 2024. rubinstein did not cite any source for his claim. in may 2024, haim rubinstein, official spokesperson for an israeli opposition leader (ofer shelah), a member of the media team for an opposition party (yesh atid), and a former spokesman for a group of hostages' families, accused israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu of "preventing a deal" due to a "conflict of interest": when "the hostages are released, bezalel smotrich and itamar ben gvir will leave the government because they’ll think the price was too high ... netanyahu knows that if he goes to elections at this time he won't be able to form a new government, and he is motivated by cold political considerations."allon, gideon (26 april 2024). "'no doubt' netanyahu preventing hostage deal, charges ex spokesman of families forum". the times of israel. retrieved 5 may 2024.

tia goldenberg, associated press tia goldenberg, associated press leave your feedback tel aviv, israel (ap)   israel’s dramatic weekend rescue of four hostages from the gaza strip, in an operation that local health officials say killed 274 palestinians, came at a sensitive time in the 8 month old war, as israel and hamas weigh a u.s. proposal for a cease fire and the release of the remaining captives. both sides face renewed pressure to make a deal: the complex rescue is unlikely to be replicated on a scale needed to bring back scores of remaining hostages, and it was a powerful reminder for israelis that there are still surviving captives held in harsh conditions. hamas now has four fewer bargaining chips. read more: centrist israeli war cabinet member benny gantz resigns over lack of postwar gaza plans but they could also dig in, as they repeatedly have over months of indirect negotiations mediated by the united states, qatar and egypt. hamas is still insisting on an end to the war as part of any agreement, while israel says it is still committed to destroying the militant group. here is a look at the fallout from the operation and how it might affect cease fire talks: the rescue operation was israel’s most successful since the start of the war, bringing home four of the roughly 250 captives seized by hamas in its oct. 7 cross border attack, including noa argamani, who became an icon of the struggle to free the hostages. the raid also killed at least 274 palestinians, according to the gaza health ministry, deepening the suffering of people in gaza who have had to endure the brutal war and a humanitarian catastrophe. the ministry does not distinguish between fighters and civilians in its tallies. the rescue was met with elation in israel, which is still reeling from the hamas attack and agonizing over the fate of the 80 captives and the remains of over 40 others still held in gaza. israeli hard liners are likely to seize on it as proof that military pressure alone will bring the rest back. people react during a rally in support of hostages in gaza, asking for their release, amid the ongoing israel hamas conflict, in tel aviv, israel, june 8, 2024. photo by marko djurica/reuters but only three other hostages have been freed by military force since the start of the war. another three were mistakenly killed by israeli forces after they escaped on their own, and hamas says others have been killed in israeli airstrikes. read more: israel rescues 4 hostages from hamas captivity, while 210 palestinians are reported killed during fighting in gaza “if anyone believes that yesterday’s operation absolves the government of the need to strike a deal, they are living a fantasy,” israeli columnist nahum barnea wrote in the mass selling yediot aharonot newspaper. “there are people out there who need to be saved, and the sooner the better.” even the israeli army’s spokesman, rear adm. daniel hagari, acknowledged the limits of military force. “what will bring most of the hostages back home alive is a deal,” he told reporters. over 100 hostages were released during a weeklong cease fire last year, in exchange for palestinians imprisoned by israel, and reaching a similar agreement is still widely seen as the only way of getting the rest of the hostages back. hours after saturday’s rescue, tens of thousands of israelis attended protests in tel aviv calling for such a deal. president joe biden last week announced a proposal for a phased plan for a cease fire and hostage release, setting in motion the administration’s most concentrated diplomatic push for a truce. biden described it as an israeli proposal, but prime minister benjamin netanyahu has publicly questioned some aspects of it, particularly its call for the withdrawal of israeli forces from gaza and a lasting truce. his ultranationalist coalition partners have threatened to bring down his government if he ends the war without destroying hamas. that appears to have only deepened suspicions on the part of hamas, which has demanded international guarantees that the war will end. it’s unclear if such guarantees have been offered, and hamas has not yet officially responded to the plan. the rescue operation was a rare win for netanyahu, who many israelis blame for the security failures leading up to the oct. 7 attack and the failure to return the hostages despite months of grinding war. he has reveled in the operation’s success, rushing saturday to the hospital where the freed hostages were held and meeting with each of them as cameras rolled. the rescue operation will likely help rehabilitate his image. read more: netanyahu says destruction of hamas ‘part of the’ cease fire proposal, according to media reports but as the elation fades, he will still face heavy pressure from an american administration that wants to wind the war down and an ultranationalist base that wants to vanquish hamas at all costs. his main political opponent, the retired general benny gantz, quit the emergency wartime coalition on sunday, leaving netanyahu even more beholden to the hard liners. netanyahu is already facing criticism from some of the families of deceased hostages, who say they received no such visits and accuse him of only taking credit for the war’s successes. israel will also likely face heightened international pressure over the raid’s high palestinian death toll. men walk among debris, aftermath of israeli strikes at the area, where israeli hostages were rescued on saturday, as palestinian death toll rises to 274, amid the israel hamas conflict, in nuseirat refugee camp in the central gaza strip, june 9, 2024. photo by abed khaled/reuters “the success in freeing four hostages is a magnificent tactical victory that has not changed our deplorable strategic situation,” columnist ben caspit wrote in israel’s maariv daily. it all makes for a tough balancing act, even for someone like netanyahu, who friends and foes alike consider to be a master politician. the operation could provide the kind of boost with the israeli public that would allow him to justify making a deal with hamas. or he might conclude that time is on his side, and that he can drive a harder bargain with the militants as they grapple with a major setback. hamas has lost four precious bargaining chips it had hoped to trade for high profile palestinian prisoners. argamani, widely known from a video showing her pleading for her life as militants dragged her away on a motorcycle, was a particularly significant loss for hamas. the raid may have also dealt a blow to hamas’ morale. in the oct. 7 attack, hamas managed to humiliate a country with a far superior army, and since then it has repeatedly regrouped despite devastating military operations across gaza. but the fact that israel was able to mount a complex rescue operation in broad daylight in the center of a crowded urban area has at least temporarily restored some of the mystique that israel’s security forces lost on oct. 7. the operation also refocused global attention on the hostage crisis at a time when the u.s. is rallying world pressure on hamas to accept the cease fire deal. but hamas has a long history of withstanding pressure from israel and others   often at enormous cost to palestinians. the militants may conclude that it’s best to use the remaining hostages to end the war while they still can   or they might just look for better places to hide them. left: file photo: people attend a rally in support of hostages in gaza, asking for their release, amid the ongoing israel hamas conflict, in tel aviv, israel, june 8, 2024. photo by marko djurica/reuters/file photo by matthew lee, associated press by wafaa shurafa, samy magdy, associated press by ellen knickmeyer, tara copp, associated press by michael weissenstein, associated press by josef federman, associated press, larry fenn, associate press tia goldenberg, associated press tia goldenberg, associated press support provided by: learn more thank you. please check your inbox to confirm. world jun 06 © 1996   2025 newshour productions llc. all rights reserved. pbs is a 501(c)(3) not for profit organization. sections about stay connected thank you. please check your inbox to confirm. learn more about friends of the news hour. support for news hour provided by

two days after israel's operation to free four of its citizens from central gaza, more details are emerging of how saturday’s rescue mission unfolded and of the hostages' eight months in captivity. the hamas run health ministry says at least 274 palestinians were killed and almost 700 injured in the assault. israeli special forces freed female hostage noa argamani using the element of surprise   but another team which had freed three male hostages came under attack prompting the israeli military to launch massive air strikes on crowded nearby streets as covering fire, killing scores of palestinians. after weeks of meticulous planning and acting on intelligence, the green light for the operation dubbed seeds of summer was given by israel’s war cabinet last thursday evening. around 10:00 local time on saturday morning and in broad daylight, two teams of israeli special forces, some disguised as palestinians, crossed into gaza. it’s thought they were travelling in at least one truck and in civilian cars. the streets of the densely populated nuseirat refugee camp were busy with people shopping in a nearby market. the targets were two residential apartments a few hundred metres apart. eyewitness isaam jameel arouqi told the bbc some of the israeli soldiers came from a truck full of furniture. he said there were two in civilian clothes and around 10 in masks and military uniforms. “suddenly, special forces came out of it and started shooting,” he said. speaking from hospital, mr arouqi says he was shot three times in the chest and stomach. there are reports of a second truck with mattresses on top from which a second team emerged, possibly using a ladder to get into one apartment. the israel defense forces (idf) says the operation to free 25 year old noa argamani went smoothly as special forces took her captors by surprise, and quickly killed the guards. israel’s channel 12 television, which has spoken to miss argamani's family, says the young woman told them she had been asked to wash the dishes on the morning of the raid. according to channel 12, she suddenly saw the israeli soldiers with masked faces who said “noa it’s the idf”. one soldier asked if he could pick her up over his shoulder. only then did she realise what was happening. after being transported by car she was then flown out of gaza by helicopter. her 246 day ordeal was over. the idf says the simultaneous operation to free shlomi ziv, 40, andrey kozlov, 27, and almog meir, 21 from the second apartment was more challenging as by this time the element of surprise had been lost. more is known about the family who the israeli military says were holding the three men. ramy abdu, the chairman of the euro med human rights monitor organisation, said initial evidence showed the israeli special forces used a ladder to enter the family home of dr ahmed al jamal. his 36 year old, son abdullah al jamal is a one time freelance journalist who had also worked for hamas as a spokesperson. the special forces shot ahmed and abdullah dead along with several members of their family, mr abdu said. the idf’s chief spokesperson rear admiral daniel hagari who was able to watch and listen to the operation unfold live via video link says the code name for the hostages was "diamonds". he described hearing with relief the words "the diamonds are in our hands", signalling the three hostages had been freed. but it was getting the three male hostages out of gaza where things began to go wrong. by now the idf says their forces were coming under heavy fire from palestinian fighters. it’s reported that at least one of the vehicles that they were leaving in broke down. the israeli military decided to send in more support, attacking from the air, from the sea and on the ground with massive force. mobile phone video from the scene shows people diving for cover as missiles whistled in and gunfire rang out. later footage showed bodies strewn in the street. it was in these moments that so many palestinians are likely to have died. "many people were in the streets, scared and running away. it was as if it were judgment day. no one knew where to go," mohammed mahmoud hamed told the bbc. "there were many people killed, so many that we couldn't even get to them. they couldn't rescue or retrieve the bodies, especially those who were wounded. people were scared to go rescue them because of the intense shooting and bombing," he said. the israeli military said aircraft had "struck dozens of military targets for the success of the operation". the two hospitals in central gaza, al aqsa martyrs' hospital in deir al balah and al awda, a facility in nuseirat, were already at breaking point and were quickly overwhelmed with bloodied casualties including many children laid out in the corridors. at al awda sitting at the bedside of his young daughter, her head bandaged, was mohamed al assar. "two of my daughters were killed and the rest were wounded," he said. "my wife, my daughter raghad, my daughter reem, minnah, jannah, all of them were wounded and two were martyred, may their souls rest in peace." sam rose the director of planning at unrwa, the un agency for palestinians, said many of his staff in the camp were caught up in the assault. "we had scores of staff literally hiding under the stairs for several hours as helicopters, tanks, naval shells, as troops on the ground fought intensely in the surrounding areas," mr rose said. there have also been some details of the conditions the four israeli hostages were kept in. the idf said they were in locked rooms and not in cages. channel 12 television says noa argamani has told her family she was moved between several different apartments during eight months of captivity but was not held in tunnels. she recounted thinking she was going to die on a number of occasions, including once when a missile was fired into a building where she was staying. ms argamani said she was given food but not enough and that she was rarely allowed to go outside for fresh air and only when disguised as a palestinian woman. she was also allowed to shower on a handful of occasions. the freeing of the four hostages has been celebrated in israel with relief and praise for the military operation. but in gaza there is outrage at the number of dead and wounded that the israelis left in their wake on one of the bloodiest days of the war so far. "i don't know how to put it into words," says one of the hostages released from gaza last month. concerns were raised over the condition of freed israeli hostages and palestinian prisoners after the latest exchange. the in laws of eli sharabi say they are worried he may not know his wife and daughters have been killed. or levy, ohad ben ami and eli sharabi are returning home after being released in gaza on saturday. the men were all taken captive during the 7 october attacks and have been held in gaza for 16 months. copyright 2025 bbc. all rights reserved. the bbc is not responsible for the content of external sites. read about our approach to external linking.

https://arab.news/wycwe jerusalem: the palestinian red crescent society (prcs) said monday that israeli troops used an aid truck to infiltrate central gaza’s nuseirat camp when they rescued four israeli hostages over the weekend. the red cross’s local palestinian branch said in a statement that it warned “of the danger of the occupation forces’ use, on saturday, of such a vehicle to infiltrate the camp. “the occupation forces deceived people by disguising themselves under the cover of aid that civilians desperately need amid their suffering from severe food insecurity,” the statement said. “this endangers the safety of relief teams.” such a precedent raises the possibility of humanitarian aid workers being perceived with suspicion in the future, nebal farsakh, a spokeswoman for prcs, told afp. asked about the red crescent’s statement monday, the israeli army referred afp to a june 8 tweet in which spokesman avichay adraee dismissed the allegations that forces entered nuseirat in aid trucks as “lies.” four hostages held in gaza since october 7 were released during the military operation in nuseirat refugee camp on saturday. almog meir jan, 22, noa argamani, 26, andrey kozlov, 27, and shlomi ziv, 41, were kidnapped from the nova festival on october 7. hamas run gaza’s health ministry said at least 274 palestinians were killed and 698 wounded during the military operation in nuseirat camp on saturday. the un’s office for the coordination of humanitarian affairs, ocha, said in a statement monday that the flow of casualties from the rescue operation “has greatly overwhelmed the limited capacities of hospitals” in the area. israeli forces have disguised themselves as civilian aid workers to reach targets in the past too. in january, undercover agents, some dressed as medics, shot dead three palestinian militants in ibn sina hospital in the occupied west bank city of jenin, with the army saying they belonged to a “hamas terrorist cell.” the war in gaza broke out after hamas’s unprecedented october 7 attack on israel, which resulted in the deaths of 1,194 people, mostly civilians, according to an afp tally based on israeli official figures. the militants also abducted 251 hostages during the attack. more than 100 of them were freed during a november truce, and after saturday’s rescue mission 116 hostages remain in gaza, although the army says 41 of them are dead. israel’s retaliatory offensive has killed at least 37,124 people in gaza, also mostly civilians, according to the hamas run territory’s health ministry. jerusalem: a palestinian woman was killed in nur shams in the west bank as part of an expanded israeli army operation in the occupied territory. the israeli army said they expanded the military operation to nur shams, a palestinian refugee camp east of tulkarm, and that its forces had killed several “militants” and detained wanted individuals in the area, a military spokesperson said on sunday. the palestinian health ministry said sunday that a woman was killed and her husband injured by israeli gunfire in tulkarm. israeli military, police and intelligence services launched a counter terrorism operation in jenin in the west bank on january 21. it is described by israeli officials as a “large scale and significant military operation”. (with reuters) deir el balah, palestinian territories: israel and hamas completed their fifth hostage prisoner swap under a fragile gaza ceasefire deal on saturday, with the frail, disoriented appearance of the three freed israelis sparking dismay among their relatives. out of the 183 inmates released by israel in return, the palestinian prisoners’ club advocacy group said seven required hospitalization, decrying “brutality” and mistreatment in jail. the fifth exchange since the truce took effect last month comes as negotiations were set to begin on the next phase of the ceasefire, which should pave the way for a permanent end to the war. the hostage and missing families forum urged the israeli government on friday to stick with the ceasefire. or levy, ohad ben ami, and eli sharabi, who were all seized by militants during the oct. 7, 2023 attack that sparked the war, “crossed the border into israeli territory” on saturday, the israeli military said. with their return, 73 out of 251 hostages taken during the attack now remain in gaza, including 34 the israeli military says are dead. jubilant crowds in israel’s commercial hub, tel aviv, cheered as they watched live footage of the three hostages, flanked by masked gunmen, brought on stage in deir el balah before being handed over to the international committee of the red cross. but the joy at their release was quickly overtaken by concern for their condition, with all three appearing thin and pale. sharabi’s cousin yochi sardinayof said “he doesn’t look well.” “i’m sure he will now receive the right treatment and get stronger ... he has an amazing family, and we will all be there for him.” the choreographed handover included forced statements from the three on stage, in which they stated support for finalizing the subsequent phases of the israel hamas truce. sharabi, 52, and ben ami, a 56 year old dual german citizen, were both abducted from their homes in kibbutz beeri when militants stormed the small community near the gaza border. sharabi lost his wife and two daughters in the attack. levy was abducted from the nova music festival, where gunmen murdered his wife. in the occupied west bank city of ramallah, the seat of the palestinian authority, relatives and supporters gathered to welcome inmates released by israel, embracing them and cheering as they stepped off the bus that brought them from nearby ofer prison. israel’s prison service said that “183 terrorists ... were released” to the west bank, annexed east jerusalem and gaza. the palestinian prisoners’ club advocacy group and the palestinian red crescent said that seven of them had been admitted to hospital in the west bank. “all the prisoners who were released today need medical care ... as a result of the brutality they were subjected” to in jail, said the advocacy group, which has long decried abuses of palestinians in israeli custody. hamas, in a statement, accused israel of “systematic assaults and mistreatment of our prisoners,” calling it “part of the policy of ... the slow killing of prisoners.” gaza militants have so far freed 21 hostages in exchange for hundreds of mostly palestinian prisoners released from israeli jails. five thai hostages freed last week from gaza were discharged on saturday from a hospital in central israel, where they had been treated since their release, and were headed back to their home country. the ceasefire aims to secure the release of 12 more hostages during its first 42 day phase. negotiations on the second stage of the ceasefire were set to begin on monday, but there have been no details on the status of the talks. the hostage and missing families forum urged the israeli government on friday to stick with the truce. “an entire nation demands to see the hostages return home,” the israeli campaign group said in a statement. “now is the time to ensure the agreement is completed   until the very last one,” it added. netanyahu’s office said that after saturday’s swap, an israeli delegation would head to doha for further talks. israel’s offensive has killed at least 48,181 people in gaza, the majority civilians, according to the territory’s health ministry. the un considers the figures reliable. the confirmed number of dead published by the ministry has continued to rise daily as bodies are discovered under the rubble, victims are identified or people die from wounds sustained earlier in the war. over the last 48 hours, 26 deaths have been recorded and more than 570 earlier deaths had been confirmed, according to the ministry. it said a total of 111,638 people have been wounded during the war, which began in october 2023. a study published in early january in the british medical journal the lancet estimated the death toll in gaza due to hostilities during the first nine months of the war was about 40 percent higher than the figures recorded by the gaza health ministry. beirut: twenty six days after nawaf salam was assigned to form a lebanese government, the decrees for its formation were announced on saturday from the presidential palace. president joseph aoun accepted the resignation of najib mikati’s government. the council of ministers is scheduled to hold its first session at the presidential palace next tuesday. in a speech after announcing the formation of the government, salam said he hoped that “it would be a government of reform and salvation, because reform is the only way for lebanon to rise.” he added: “with president aoun, we launch the workshop to build a new lebanon.” he said that “the diversity of ministers’ names will not hinder the function of government, and no government formation will satisfy everyone. we will work in a unified manner. i am keeping in mind the establishment of a state of law and institutions, and we are laying the foundations for reform and rescue. there is no room to turn back time, and we must begin work immediately. “the government will have to work with parliament to complete the implementation of the taif agreement and proceed with financial and economic reforms. “the government will be a place for constructive joint work and not for disputes. i am determined to lay the foundations for reform and rescue in cooperation with president aoun.” salam continued: “this government will strive to restore trust and bridge the gap between the state and the aspirations of the youth. it must work toward the full implementation of the taif agreement, proceed with financial and economic reforms, and establish an independent judiciary.” he emphasized the importance of “ensuring security and stability in lebanon by completing the implementation of resolution 1701.” he said: “it is difficult for any government formation to satisfy everyone. however, the government will endeavor to be cohesive, and diversity will not serve as a source of obstruction to its work, nor will it provide a platform for narrow interests.” the government included tarek mitri as deputy prime minister, michel menassa as defense minister, ahmad hajjar as interior minister, youssef raji as foreign minister, yassine jaber as finance minister, ghassan salameh as culture minister, laura khazen lahoud as tourism minister, kamal chehade as minister of displaced persons and artificial intelligence, nora bayrakdarian as minister of sports and youth, rima karami as education minister, adel nassar as justice minister, rakan nasser eldine as health minister, mohammed haidar as labor minister, joseph sadi as energy minister, amir bisat as economy minister, charles hajj as telecommunications minister, joe issa el khoury as industry minister, fayez rasamny as public works minister, nizar el hani as agriculture minister, fadi makki as minister of administrative development, tamara zein as environment minister, hanin sayyed as social affairs minister and paul marcos as information minister. salam’s government during aoun’s presidency has broken the norms established by hezbollah and its allies over three terms, which dictated that the government be composed of direct party representatives and that hezbollah maintain a significant influence capable of obstructing decisions at every critical political or security juncture. a technocratic government has been formed, one that is widely acknowledged and uncontested by political parties. despite pressure from hezbollah and the amal movement over the past few weeks to form a government similar to its predecessor, both the president and the prime minister designate stood firm. as a result, they eventually formed a government that reflects the reformist spirit expressed in aoun’s oath speech. the new government has no members affiliated with the free patriotic movement, but it does have representatives close to the lebanese forces party. notably, it includes five women, and for the first time, a ministerial portfolio has been dedicated to artificial intelligence. the government consists of 24 ministers. its formation was delayed from friday to saturday due to disagreements over shiite representation. at noon on saturday, salam presented three candidates to the presidential palace for selection to fill the fifth shiite seat in the administrative development portfolio. fadi makki, former adviser to prime minister rafic hariri in 2002, was chosen. makki is known for pioneering the application of behavioral economics in public policy across the middle east. the announcement of the new government coincided with the conclusion of the two day visit by us deputy envoy for the middle east, morgan ortagus, who held discussions with several lebanese officials. ortagus’s statement at the presidential palace on friday caught many by surprise, when she said: “the us expresses its gratitude to our ally israel for defeating hezbollah. hezbollah must not be part of the government in any way. it must remain demilitarized and militarily defeated.” according to salam’s office, ortagus met him and reaffirmed “the us support for lebanon in this new era and government.” salam emphasized to ortagus the need for “international pressure to ensure israel’s complete withdrawal from the occupied lebanese territories by the feb. 18 deadline. this withdrawal must occur without delay or procrastination, in full compliance with international resolutions.” ortagus also met the parliament speaker, nabih berri. notably, during this meeting, she was not wearing the star of david ring she had worn during her earlier meeting with the president on friday. while ortagus did not make a statement, berri’s media office reiterated that “israel’s continued occupation of lebanese territories necessitates our resistance.” in a separate development, israeli forces continued to demolish homes in villages along the southern border. meanwhile, for a third consecutive day, deadly clashes intensified in north east lebanon along the syrian border and in villages straddling lebanese and syrian territories. on friday, aoun held a phone conversation with syrian president ahmad al sharaa. they both agreed to coordinate efforts to control the situation on the lebanese syrian border and prevent civilian casualties. the border town of jarmash was targeted by missiles and drones, while additional missiles landed near the lebanese town of qasr, leaving one civilian seriously injured. after the shelling of the border area, the lebanese red cross transported eight wounded people to hospitals in hermel. the lebanese town of qanafez, on the northern border of hermel, was hit by artillery shelling from the qusayr countryside, breaking a night of relative calm. armed clansmen intercepted and shot down three shaheen drones over the northern border villages of hermel, after they were launched from syrian territory. according to the lebanese national news agency, they also destroyed a tank in the town of jarmash. lebanese media reports indicated that 10 members of hayat tahrir al sham were killed, while three others were captured in the aftermath of the clashes. the clashes broke out last thursday when forces aligned with the new syrian administration advanced on the border town of hawik as part of a sweeping operation to “seal off smuggling routes for weapons and contraband.” washington: he has no foreign policy experience but sports a reputation as a talented negotiator unafraid to speak his mind. and donald trump’s special middle east envoy steve witkoff has already made his mark. a close friend to the us president, 67 year old real estate magnate witkoff is credited with playing a key role in negotiating the ceasefire in gaza between israel and the hamas armed group. the truce took effect january 19, on the eve of trump’s inauguration for a second term in the white house. this week, witkoff found himself in the spotlight, defending the us president’s stunning suggestion that he wanted to “take over” the gaza strip and move its two million palestinian inhabitants elsewhere. “when the president talks about cleaning it out, he talks about making it habitable, and this is a long range plan,” witkoff told reporters at the white house just ahead of a joint news conference by trump and visiting israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu. “and this guy knows real estate,” national security adviser mike waltz, appearing alongside the special envoy, said with a smile. speaking later that day on fox news, witkoff continued laying out the administration’s justification for the notion of a large scale relocation of palestinians from gaza   even as the idea drew fire in the region, with some calling it tantamount to ethnic cleansing. “a better life is not necessarily tied to the physical space that you’re in today,” he said, seeming to gloss over the complexities of the decades old israeli palestinian conflict. trump had nothing but praise for witkoff at the white house news conference. “steve, stand up, steve, please. what a job you’ve done. quite a good job. you’ve done a fantastic job,” he said. it was witkoff, a billionaire like his friend and a regular golfing partner of his, who was called on to introduce the new president at a celebratory gathering at a washington arena following his january 20 inauguration. though a complete neophyte in the world of diplomacy, witkoff was named as special envoy to the middle east only a week after trump’s election, a reflection of the two men’s close relationship. eight years earlier, after trump was elected for his first term, he named another diplomatic novice   his son in law jared kushner   to the same position. even before trump took office, witkoff joined in the gaza ceasefire talks, taking part in a final round of negotiations in early january alongside brett mcgurk, the middle east adviser to then president joe biden. it was a rare collaboration between an outgoing and incoming us administration. after attending the talks in the qatari capital of doha, witkoff flew to israel on a saturday   interrupting netanyahu on the jewish sabbath   in an urgent bid to finalize an agreement. then on january 29, witkoff traveled to gaza, much of which has been reduced to rubble after 15 months of an israeli offensive launched in response to hamas’s october 7, 2023, attack. he was the first us official to visit the territory since the war began. in an article published thursday by foreign policy journal, steven cook, an expert with the council on foreign relations, said that witkoff’s lack of diplomatic experience could be an advantage, giving him a fresh perspective. still, he added: “the israel palestine conflict is not a real estate deal.” born on march 15, 1957, in the new york borough of the bronx, witkoff made his fortune in real estate, first as a corporate lawyer and then at the head of big realty firms. in 1997, he founded the witkoff group, which describes itself as “one part developer, one part investor (and) one part landscape changer.” his wife and a son work there. a graduate of hofstra university near new york, witkoff has several children, including one who died in 2011, aged 22, from an oxycontin overdose.

share this via facebook share this via x share this via whatsapp share this via email more sharing options share this via linkedin share this via reddit share this via telegram share this via printer share this via bluesky download the full report in english download the summary and recommendations in arabic download the summary and recommendations in hebrew annex i: list of evacuation orders analyzed for this report annex ii: translations of evacuation orders posted to official israeli military social media channels video download the full report in english download the summary and recommendations in arabic download the summary and recommendations in hebrew annex i: list of evacuation orders analyzed for this report annex ii: translations of evacuation orders posted to official israeli military social media channels israel’s forced displacement of palestinians in gaza this is the story of two palestinian residents, ghassan and sara, who sought to escape the violence in gaza but were trapped in the hostilities and their lives irreversibly changed. (jerusalem, november 14, 2024)   israeli authorities have caused the massive, deliberate forced displacement of palestinian civilians in gaza since october 2023 and are responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity, human rights watch said in a report released today. the report is being published at the time of an ongoing israeli military campaign in northern gaza that has most likely created a new wave of forced displacement of hundreds of thousands of civilians. the 154 page report, “‘hopeless, starving, and besieged’: israel’s forced displacement of palestinians in gaza,” examines how israeli authorities’ conduct has led to the displacement of over 90 percent of the population of gaza 1.9 million palestinians and the widespread destruction of much of gaza over the last 13 months. israeli forces have carried out deliberate, controlled demolitions of homes and civilian infrastructure, including in areas where they have apparent aims of creating “buffer zones” and security “corridors,” from which palestinians are likely to be permanently displaced. contrary to claims by israeli officials, their actions do not comply with the laws of war. palestinians flee south via salah al din road, in central gaza, on the third day of a temporary ceasefire between israel and hamas on november 26, 2023. © 2023 ap photo/hatem moussa this is the story of two palestinian residents, ghassan and sara, who sought to escape the violence in gaza but were trapped in the hostilities and their lives irreversibly changed. (jerusalem, november 14, 2024)   israeli authorities have caused the massive, deliberate forced displacement of palestinian civilians in gaza since october 2023 and are responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity, human rights watch said in a report released today. the report is being published at the time of an ongoing israeli military campaign in northern gaza that has most likely created a new wave of forced displacement of hundreds of thousands of civilians. the 154 page report, “‘hopeless, starving, and besieged’: israel’s forced displacement of palestinians in gaza,” examines how israeli authorities’ conduct has led to the displacement of over 90 percent of the population of gaza 1.9 million palestinians and the widespread destruction of much of gaza over the last 13 months. israeli forces have carried out deliberate, controlled demolitions of homes and civilian infrastructure, including in areas where they have apparent aims of creating “buffer zones” and security “corridors,” from which palestinians are likely to be permanently displaced. contrary to claims by israeli officials, their actions do not comply with the laws of war. the first thing i thought of was the nakba [“the catastrophe”] of 1948, i thought [the israeli authorities] were trying to do this again, to take over our land and our houses again. once i heard the evacuation order to go south, my first reaction was: i'm not leaving. it is not an option to leave everything i have worked for…but then the bombs started and our houses were being destroyed, i needed to protect my family. this is why i finally left. ― dr. hassan, a 49 year old man who fled with his family from his home near jabalia in northern gaza to khan younis in the south, november 30, 2023 dr. hassan fled from his home in jabalia refugee camp in northern gaza on october 11, 2023, and fled south where he and 36 other members of his family sought refuge in khan younis after the israeli military instructed people to go there for their safety. he described israeli bombardments while fleeing along the main artery to the south, the salah al din road, and israeli airstrikes when he got to khan younis where all the shelters were full, and his family had to separate to find somewhere to sleep. after multiple rounds of displacement dr. hassan and his family remain displaced in southern gaza. on october 7, 2023, palestinian armed groups in gaza carried out devastating attacks on southern israel, committing numerous war crimes and crimes against humanity against civilians. israel responded with a military offensive against palestinian armed groups in gaza. this offensive, which includes a massive bombing campaign and ground attacks across israeli occupied gaza, continues to this day. there have been ongoing attacks on military targets, but there have also been significant amounts of unlawful airstrikes and destruction of civilian infrastructure and housing, a tight blockade of gaza that has led to a humanitarian catastrophe and amounts to collective punishment of the civilian population, and the use of starvation as a weapon of war. since the first days of the offensive, israel has carried out these acts in conjunction with an evacuation system that has flagrantly failed to keep palestinians in gaza safe, and in fact put them in harm’s way. nowhere in gaza is safe. as this report will show, israel’s actions have intentionally caused the mass and forced displacement of the majority of the civilian population of gaza. according to the united nations, 1.9 million people were displaced in gaza as of october 2024 out of a population of 2.2 million people. this report examines the israeli authorities’ conduct which has led to this extraordinarily high level of displacement and finds these actions amount to forced displacement. given the evidence strongly indicates that multiple acts of forced displacement were carried out with intent, it amounts to war crimes. the report further finds that the israeli government’s acts of forced displacement are widespread and systematic. statements by senior officials with command responsibility show that forced displacement is intentional and forms part of israeli state policy and therefore amount to a crime against humanity. israel’s actions appear to also meet the definition of ethnic cleansing. date locator: oct, 2023,gaza soundbite: ghassan, video diary we’ve just been targeted. we’ve just been targeted. we’ve just been targeted by warplanes. we are now with the red crescent crews. thank god for your safety, firas. thank you, firas. no need to worry, we’re okay. vo: this is the story of two palestinian residents, ghassan and sara, who sought to escape the violence in gaza but were trapped in the hostilities and their lives irreversibly changed. title: warning this video contains violent images and descriptions including people injured, and distressing scenes. viewer discretion advised. title: nowhere is safe title: ghassan date locator: oct, 2023, gaza vo: since the start of the hostilities, ghassan has kept a video diary documenting his daily life. soundbite: ghassan, video diary jabalia camp is completely isolated from the world, they cut the internet, they cut everything. vo: israel has enforced a tight blockade of gaza. this has led to a humanitarian catastrophe. and an evacuation system that has unashamedly failed to keep civilians in gaza safe. soundbite: ghassan i have here [a video] when they [israeli forces] dropped leaflets on us to evacuate. leaflets demanding that we evacuate the area. here it is clearly as you can see. “head towards...” this is the trap i’m talking about. vo: for the displacement of individuals to be lawful the following conditions are among those that must be met. ensure people are moved safely, not separated from their families and have access to food, water, sanitation and healthcare. the evacuation should be temporary, and displaced people should be free and able to return to their homes as soon as possible after the hostilities end in that area. israel’s military has displaced 90 percent of the gaza population, around 1.9 million people. vo/animated map: this map shows the evacuation order on october 13, 2023, directing civilians towards supposed ‘safe zones.’ human rights watch investigated the israeli authorities’ policies and conduct. we found that repeated evacuations, mass destruction, and failure to provide safe passage or access to food, shelter or medical care make the displacement unlawful. vo: the level of intent and evidence of a state policy of forced displacement means these are war crimes and crimes against humanity. soundbite: ghassan during that time, there was chaos and panic. the street where i was walking was being bombed, bombed, bombed everywhere. soundbite: ghassan, video diary here we are, displaced in the streets of jabalia camp. no one knows anything about us, and we’ve lost all means of communications. we found a car on the street, and hisham and i sat inside it. we don't know where to go, and this car isn't ours. but we opened its doors and sat inside. if someone finds this phone and we are no longer alive...let them tell the story and broadcast these recordings. soundbite: ghassan suddenly, i saw a massive flash...when you are in the epicenter of an explosion, you feel absolutely nothing. you start checking your body to see if you've lost any parts of it. soundbite: ghassan, video diary this place was bombed last night. we are now in the early hours of dawn. i was inside this car. i was hit by shrapnel while sitting inside it. can’t you see how bad it is [the destruction]? the post office building was targeted. while i was sitting inside this car. soundbite: ghassan i owe my survival to that car, which shielded us from the blast and the flying shrapnel. afterward, i decided that we had to escape from the north at least. our relationship to the camp is our life, it's [the camp] our whole life. soundbite: ghassan displacement feels like your soul is being torn from your body. soundbite: ghassan, video diary everyone is evacuating to different places. i just left the camp heading to rafah after being bombed. we're riding a donkey drawn cart because there are no cars. vo/animated map the salah al din road is the main highway that runs north south through the gaza strip. israeli evacuation orders started on october 13, 2023, running until january, 4, 2024. they instructed people to flee using this road and assured “safe passage.” later evacuation orders told people to use a different route. investigations by human rights watch through interviews, satellite imagery, photos and videos demonstrate that this road was rarely, if ever, safe. soundbite: ghassan honestly, there are moments when you feel like you are alone on this planet. that day, the electricity was completely cut off from the northern gaza strip. and also the water, which the occupation [israel] declared they had cut off from gaza, and the communications and internet networks. soundbite: ghassan when i reached rafah, i realized it was a trap. a mousetrap, as we call it. we lived in a house consisting of three floors. over 200 members of my family had sought refuge in this house. imagine, i was sleeping in a space only as large as my body. if i turn to this side, i bump into something and if i turn to the other side, i bump into something. soundbite: ghassan video diary the bombing continues, with massive destruction and limited resources. title: hamoud, ghassan’s son soundbite: ghassan video diary and this is hamoud. soundbite: ghassan video diary what do you think of the current situation? soundbite: hamoud, [ghassan’s son] video diary good. soundbite: ghassan video diary are you scared of the sounds of bombing? soundbite: hamoud, [ghassan’s son] video diary yes. soundbite: ghassan video diary what is your wish? soundbite: ghassan video diary for the war to end. soundbite: ghassan video diary where do you want to go? soundbite: ghassan video diary do you want to go back home? soundbite: ghassan video diary come, bilal. title: bilal, ghassan’s son soundbite: ghassan video diary what’s your wish, bilal? soundbite: bilal [ghassan’s son] video diary to go back home. soundbite: ghassan video diary do you want to go back home? soundbite: bilal [ghassan’s son] video diary yes, to eat and drink. soundbite: ghassan video diary to eat and drink. soundbite: ghassan video diary we hope the war ends and we return to our homes. soundbite: ghassan they [israeli forces] claimed rafah is a safe area, that rafah has humanitarian aid. when did aid actually reach gaza? i spent about a month in rafah, standing in queues. i stood from 7 a.m. until 2 p.m. to get some bread that i bought with my own money. news started spreading that they [israeli forces] will invade rafah, and i lived in the brazil neighborhood on the border. this mix of news and the psychological state caused by the war forced us to flee. especially that they [israeli forces] were heavily bombing apartments and homes. so, our option was to move into a tent with the rest of the displaced people. vo: under the laws of war, israel, as the occupying power, is only permitted to temporarily evacuate people under its control for specific reasons. israel must allow all the displaced to return once hostilities end. instead, most of housing and civilian infrastructure has been destroyed so that much of gaza is uninhabitable. rather than meet its obligations to put in place basic protections to ensure access to food, water, sanitation and health care. israel has taken steps to cut them off. soundbite: ghassan people began fleeing from the displacement camp in rafah little by little. the camp was so crowded that you couldn't see the sand because there were so many tents. we arrived here [deir al balah], and as you know, there is no truly safe place in gaza. the shelling continues in this area. there is no safety. in truth, i don’t recall ever feeling safe since i was displaced from the north. i can’t sleep. my mind is always wandering. title: sara vo/animated map: on december 1, 2023, the israeli military released an interactive map dividing gaza into 620 numbered blocks and continued to post and distribute evacuation orders referencing this block system. on december 7, 2023, sara’s family home in khan younis was not in a block slated for evacuation. human rights watch interviewed sara and analyzed satellite imagery, video and photographs taken from that day. the information gathered indicates that the israeli military knew or should have known that civilians were living in this block. title: an actor’s voice has been used to protect sara’s identity. sara is not her real name. soundbite: sara the israeli’s had renamed our area by blocks so everyone could keep track of where there could be strikes, we were living in block g, number 108. at around 4 p.m. i was coming home from work, what i saw as i approached was a massacre, it was hectic, everyone was screaming, and all i could see was fire and destruction. i was scared because my kids were home and my sisters were taking refuge at my house, so we had about 20 people living in our apartment on the third floor. thank god my family in the apartment were ok, it was the building just next to us that had been hit. there was so much damage to the building i couldn’t enter, i could see bodies, people under the rubble. many people died that day. seeing all of this has affected my kids hugely, it changed us all. vo/animated map: by analyzing online evacuation orders and photographs of air dropped leaflets posted online, human rights watch established that block 108 was not designated for evacuation until six and a half weeks after this strike. human rights watch identified at least six additional strikes in this block before the attack on sara’s relatives’ home which also damaged hers on december, 7, 2023. just dozens of meters from that attack two additional strikes were carried out in the same timeframe. analysis of satellite imagery shows that the attack on sara’s relatives’ home was not an isolated incident. vo/animated map: the evacuation system failed to keep people safe. evacuation orders were inconsistent, inaccurate and frequently not communicated to civilians at all, or with enough time to allow evacuations. the sheer number of palestinian civilians forced from their homes demonstrates that displacement in gaza is widespread. vo: it is also systematic and intentional and unlawful, forming part of israeli state policy. this amounts to a crime against humanity. israel should stop collectively punishing civilians in gaza. governments should publicly condemn israel’s forced displacement of the civilian population as a war crime and crime against humanity and suspend military assistance and arms sales to israel. title: sara, actor’s voice soundbite: sara in previous wars they did target specific places, but we would know in advance, and be given warning. this war is completely different. there is nowhere safe for us to go. soundbite: ghassan i fear living through another displacement experience, and i fear that winter may come before the war ends. because this tent you see in front of you won’t hold up in winter. the feeling of loss itself is beyond comparison to any other feeling. i hope...that the time will come when i return to my home, and i rest my head on my pillow in freedom and peace. end credits: narrator: nadia hardman producer / editor: ellie kealey producers: gabi ivens, carolina jordá álvarez, léo martine, ekin ürgen videographer: yousef al masharawi graphics: win edson additional footage / photographs: ghassan salem, afp, imago music: audio network israel is the occupying power in gaza and as such its conduct is governed by international humanitarian law (ihl). under ihl   or the laws of war   forcible transfer, which means the forced displacement of any civilian inside an occupied territory, is prohibited, and, if committed with criminal intent, is a war crime. the only exception to this fundamental prohibition is when an occupying power evacuates people for their security or for an imperative military reason. for each displacement of a civilian to be lawful, israel’s actions must also meet the following conditions: i) ensure that safeguards are in place so that the civilian who is forced from their home is moved safely, is not separated from family, and has access to food and water, health care, sanitation, and reception centers or shelter, ii) ensure the evacuation is temporary; and iii) facilitate the displaced person’s return to their home as soon as possible after the end of the hostilities in the area from where the person was displaced. israel claims that the displacement of nearly all of gaza’s population has been justified for the security of the population and for imperative military reasons, and it has taken the requisite steps to safeguard civilians. because palestinian armed groups are fighting from among the civilian population, israeli officials claim, the military has evacuated civilians to enable it to target fighters and destroy the groups’ infrastructure, such as tunnels, while limiting harm to civilians, such that the mass displacements were lawful. this report, based on interviews with 39 palestinians who are internally displaced in gaza, most multiple times, an intricate analysis of israel’s evacuation system, the widespread destruction evidenced on satellite imagery, the analysis of videos and photographs of attacks on designated safe zones and roads and the humanitarian situation of the population, finds that israel’s claims of lawful displacement are largely false. human rights watch has amassed evidence that israeli officials are instead committing the war crime of forcible transfer, a grave breach of the geneva conventions and a crime under the rome statute of the international criminal court (icc). demonstrably, israel has not evacuated palestinian civilians in gaza for their security, as they have not been secure during evacuations or on arrival at designated safe zones. nor has israel convincingly claimed that it had a military imperative for forcing most palestinian civilians from their homes. even if israel was able to demonstrate such an imperative, its failure to ensure the security and the guarantee of protections of displaced persons as they fled and in the places to which they were displaced would still render the displacement unlawful. the evacuation system failed to keep people safe and instead often served only to spread fear and anxiety. evacuation orders were inconsistent, inaccurate, and frequently not communicated to civilians with enough time to allow evacuations or at all. the evacuation orders also failed to take into account the needs of people with disabilities, many of whom are unable to leave without assistance. designated evacuation routes and safe zones were repeatedly attacked by the israeli military. rather than meet its obligations to put in place basic safeguards to ensure access to food, water, sanitation, and health care, israel has taken steps to cut them off or severely restrict humanitarian aid. further, israel is under an obligation to actively facilitate the return of displaced persons to their homes in areas where hostilities have ceased, but it has instead rendered large parts of gaza uninhabitable. the israeli military has carried out demolitions, intentionally destroying or severely damaging civilian infrastructure, including schools, and religious and cultural institutions, including after hostilities had largely ceased in an area and its forces controlled the area. the israeli military is also establishing what appear to be permanent buffer zones   securitized and emptied areas of land between the israeli and gaza border where palestinians will likely not be allowed to enter. the burden is on israel, as the occupying power of gaza, to prove that overriding military reasons have made its repeated instructions to evacuate   which have displaced nearly all of gaza’s population   imperative, or the evacuations were necessary for the security of the population itself. the term “imperative” sets a very high threshold   higher than an ordinary assessment of military necessity. displacement can only be justified if it is a measure of last resort for military operations where there are no feasible alternatives. it does not suffice for civilians to be at risk from an active or reasonably expected threat from an act (the israeli bombardment) that would deprive palestinian armed groups of, or secure for israel, as the occupier, a military advantage. for there to be a military imperative, the operation threatened must be one whose frustration would threaten the entire military objective in the conflict. israel cannot simply rely on the presence of members of palestinian armed groups, materiel, and installations in gaza to justify the displacement of civilians. israel would have to demonstrate that displacement of the civilians was, in each instance, its only option. evacuating a protected population for their security refers to the temporary removal or relocation of civilians from an area of danger or imminent harm to a safer location. this can be done to protect the population from military operations, ongoing hostilities, or other risks to their safety. while it could be argued that israel at times moved palestinians in gaza to areas that were safer than areas from which they were ordered to leave, this report demonstrates that evacuation routes and so called safe zones were consistently and repeatedly bombed, undermining the israeli military’s position that people were being moved “for their safety.” israel cannot rely on the security and safety of civilians as a justification for evacuating people if there are no safe areas to which civilians can move. ultimately, as this report will show, even if israel can demonstrate that its actions fall within the displacement exception, its lack of adherence to the strict protections required to make an evacuation lawful demonstrates that its orders for people to move were a pretext for forced displacement. while there are not detailed criteria for what constitutes an ihl compliant evacuation system, article 49 of the geneva convention states that civilians should be, among other conditions, moved in “safety.” in other words, the fundamental goal is to protect civilians from the dangers of conflict. instead of protecting palestinians in gaza, israel’s evacuation system put people in harm’s way. the israeli military began pounding gaza with airstrikes on october 7, 2023. days later, overnight into october 13, 2023, the israeli military ordered more than a million people in northern gaza to evacuate within 24 hours. this first broad and urgent mass evacuation order was followed up with more orders and directives to palestinian civilians throughout the north of gaza to leave their homes and move south. israel put in place an evacuation system that gave instructions which were unclear, inaccurate, and contradictory, making it extremely difficult for civilians to know where or when to move. others contained missing or contradictory information about where to go, when, and which destinations were safe, and were corrected only hours later, if at all. for example, on july 1, the israeli military issued an evacuation order for neighborhoods in eastern khan younis and rafah, including al fukhari where the european hospital, one of the largest hospitals in southern gaza, is located. the next morning, the israeli military and the coordination of government activities in the territories (cogat) issued a clarification in english on their x accounts stating that the hospital was not subject to evacuation. the cogat arabic facebook page also updated the evacuation order post to include the clarification. however, this clarification was not shared by any of the israeli military’s arabic spokesperson’s social media accounts. by the time the clarifications were issued, staff and patients had reportedly already started to flee the hospital. many orders were issued online during time periods coinciding with total telecommunications network blackouts in gaza. dozens of orders were issued after the time period specified for safe evacuations had already begun, while others were issued after attacks had already started. where evacuation orders did suggest a destination or direction of movement, the orders gave far too little time for people to move through what was already an active conflict zone. overall, israel’s evacuation system flagrantly failed to ensure civilians could travel safely or reach safety and would be secure after arriving to their place of displacement, and often served only to create widespread fear and confusion, misery, and anxiety. a recent report from the independent international inquiry on the occupied palestinian territory, including east jerusalem and israel, found that the israeli military did not offer assistance to those who were unable to evacuate due to disability, age, illness, or other status. where civilians did attempt to move away from areas that were declared combat zones, both the routes and destinations were unsafe. israeli forces’ fire hit civilians on evacuation routes, notably the main north south artery, salah al din road. ultimately, no destination within gaza was safe, with the israeli military repeatedly attacking areas it had designated as evacuation areas, including deadly attacks on locations where humanitarian aid workers had shared their precise coordinates with the israeli military. for example, on february 20, an israeli tank fired a medium to large caliber weapon at a multi story apartment building housing only médecins sans frontières (msf) staff and their families in al mawasi, the israeli designated humanitarian safe zone. the attack killed two people and injured seven. msf said it had provided the coordinates of the building to israeli authorities and neither saw military objects in the area nor received a warning prior to the attack. under the laws of war, israel is required to put in place measures to ensure the health, nutrition, and safety of the displaced population if it wants to benefit from the evacuation exception to the prohibition on displacement. instead, it displaced people to areas where it did not provide them with   and where they could not access   essential goods and services. for example, when israel designated al mawasi as a humanitarian safe zone, the 20 square kilometer area had no running water, bathrooms, or the presence of international humanitarian agencies who could coordinate assistance. rather than meet its obligations, israel’s response to the hamas led october 7 attacks has been to take steps to deny access to sufficient humanitarian aid in gaza. it initially imposed a complete siege on gaza, cutting off essential public services, including water and electricity, to gaza’s civilian population and deliberately blocking the entry of fuel and rights critical humanitarian aid. since then, israel has damaged and destroyed resources vital for the realization of human rights, including hospitals, schools, water and energy infrastructure, bakeries, and agricultural land, and has permitted only limited humanitarian access, which remains utterly insufficient to meet the essential needs of the population. as a result, gaza is experiencing a humanitarian crisis. children have died from malnutrition and dehydration, and as of october 2024, about 1.95 million out of gaza’s 2.2 million people were projected to suffer “catastrophic,” “emergency,” or “crisis” levels of food insecurity, according to the integrated food security phase classification (a tool for improving food security analysis and decision making). the report further states that “the risk of famine between november 2024 and april 2025 persists as long as conflict continues, and humanitarian access is restricted.” since january 2024, the international court of justice (icj) has three times ordered provisional measures in south africa’s case alleging that israel is violating the genocide convention of 1948. on january 26, 2024, the icj ordered israel to “take immediate and effective measures to enable the provision of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance…in the gaza strip.” despite this binding order, israel continued to restrict or block aid. noting that “catastrophic living conditions of the palestinians in the gaza strip have deteriorated further,” and citing “the prolonged and widespread deprivation of food and other basic necessities,” the icj issued further measures in march 2024 ordering israel to ensure the provision of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance “including food, water, fuel, shelter, clothing, hygiene and sanitation requirements, alongside medical assistance, including medical supplies and support.” a third icj order, issued on may 24, required israel to “maintain open the rafah crossing for unhindered provision at scale of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance.” at the time of publication, the rafah crossing has remained closed since israeli forces took control of it on may 7, 2024. ihl requires any evacuation of a population to be temporary and people must be allowed to return to their homes. israeli forces have destroyed the majority of gaza’s water, sanitation, communications, energy, and transport infrastructure, as well as its schools and hospitals. they have systematically razed orchards, fields, and greenhouses. so much civilian infrastructure has been destroyed that much of gaza is uninhabitable, and it is inconsistent with israel’s obligation to ensure that civilians can return when hostilities cease in an affected area. it largely took place after israeli officials specifically stated that damage, not accuracy, was the purpose of bombardments. the world bank has estimated that as of january 2024, over 60 percent of residential buildings and over 80 percent of commercial facilities have been damaged or destroyed in gaza. by august 2024, over 93 percent of gaza’s schools, and all its universities, had been destroyed or significantly damaged. the united nations environment programme has noted the unprecedented impacts of the war on the environment, exposing the community to rapidly growing soil, water and air pollution and risks of irreversible damage to its natural ecosystems. as of july, the world health organization (who) has registered more than 1,000 attacks on healthcare facilities in the occupied palestinian territory (opt) since october 7, 2023, and noted that there are no functional hospitals in gaza’s southernmost city of rafah as of writing. the un agency for development (undp) has estimated it will cost us$40 to $50 billion to rebuild gaza and require an effort on a scale the world has not seen since world war ii. israel has also carried out deliberate, controlled demolitions, including to create an extended “buffer zone” and a new road that bifurcates gaza in the so called “netzarim corridor.” this permanently changes the land on which they are constructed, involves the demolition of homes and other civilian infrastructure, and demonstrates an intention to prevent palestinian civilians in gaza from returning once hostilities have ended. the intention to forcibly displace palestinians in gaza need not be permanent in order to constitute a war crime. what is abundantly clear, however, is many, if not the majority of, palestinians in gaza will be permanently displaced considering the level of destruction experienced in gaza. human rights watch calls on israel to respect the right of palestinian civilians to return to the areas from which they have been displaced in gaza. it bears remembering that 80 percent of gaza’s population are refugees and their descendants, people who were expelled or fled in 1948 from what is now israel, in what palestinians call the nakba. every person has the right to return to their country, a right enshrined in numerous human rights conventions, and affirmed for palestinian refugees in un general assembly resolutions dating back to 1948. for decades, israeli authorities have consistently denied this right and blocked palestinian refugees from returning. this historic precedent looms over the experience of palestinians in gaza: those human rights watch interviewed frequently spoke of living through a second nakba. the violations committed against palestinians forced to leave their homes more than 75 years ago continue against them and their descendants today as millions of palestinians, including those living in gaza during the current hostilities, continue to be denied their right to permanently return. forced displacement can amount to a crime against humanity when it is committed as a part of a widespread or systematic “attack directed against a civilian population,” which means the multiple commission of such crimes committed pursuant to a state policy. the crime against humanity of forced displacement is defined under the rome statute as deportation or forcible transfer, meaning forced displacement of the persons concerned by expulsion or other coercive acts from the area in which they are lawfully present, without grounds permitted under international law. senior officials in the israeli government and the war cabinet have repeatedly declared their intent to forcibly displace the population, declaring their policy goal throughout the conflict, from the early days of the war to over a year later, with government ministers stating that the territory of gaza will decrease, that blowing up and flattening gaza is beautiful, and that land will be handed to settlers. avi dichter, israel’s minister of agriculture and food security, said, “we are now rolling out the gaza nakba.” israeli officials’ statements and actions have indicated they are implementing a plan to create large parts of gaza as “buffer” areas or corridors, where palestinians will not be permitted to live. while prime minister benjamin netanyahu has at times stated the opposite intention, the actions of the israeli authorities and military throughout the conflict, as evidenced in this report, together with statements of intent by senior members of government, including prime minister netanyahu, demonstrates the underlying state level policy to forcibly transfer many, if not the majority, of the population in gaza. instead of providing for the displaced population, the israeli authorities have deliberately restricted humanitarian assistance and used starvation as a weapon of war. the israeli military has brought about widespread destruction in gaza, much of this caused recklessly as a result of the hostilities or through deliberate razing of land and buildings after the military took control of the area. given the sheer number of palestinian civilians in gaza driven from their land and the manner of their displacement, and the attempts to make their return impossible, the forced displacement is widespread, systematic, and intentional, and amounts to a crime against humanity. although not a formal legal term or a recognized crime under international law, “ethnic cleansing” was defined by the final report of the united nations commission of experts on the former yugoslavia as a purposeful policy by an ethnic or religious group to remove, by violent and terror inspiring means, the civilian population of another ethnic or religious group from certain geographic areas. as this report makes clear, the displacement of palestinians in gaza was conducted through serious human rights violations and violations of international humanitarian law, including war crimes and crimes against humanity. the actions of the israeli authorities in gaza are the actions of one ethnic or religious group to remove palestinians, another ethnic or religious group, from areas within gaza by violent means. the organized, forced displacement of palestinians in gaza, has removed much of the palestinian population from land, and specific areas of gaza, that for decades and generations have been their home. nowhere is this clearer than in areas which have been razed, extended, and cleared for buffer zones and security corridors. the intention of israeli forces appears likely to ensure they remain permanently emptied and cleansed of palestinians and, in their place, occupied and controlled by israeli forces. taken together, these acts indicate that, at least in the buffer zones and security corridors in gaza, the israeli authorities are pursuing a policy of ethnic cleansing. lack of accountability for grave violations in the opt has fueled cycles of abuse for years. victims of serious abuses in israel and palestine have faced a wall of impunity for decades. during the current conflict, israel has cut food, water, and electricity that is vital for the lives of 2.2 million people who have been living under a blockade for 17 years. entire families have been wiped off the family registry, the health and education systems destroyed, entire districts razed to the ground, all while the victims of these abuses are called “animals.” an entire population is being collectively punished when israel prevents desperately needed aid from reaching them. the laws of war are clear: atrocities from one side do not justify atrocities from the other side. no party to any conflict is above ihl. israeli and palestinian lives have the same dignity, deserve the same protection, and attacks on either should spark the same levels of indignation. given the grave nature of the violations which have been committed and documented in this report and the pervasive climate of impunity for those crimes, human rights watch has for years pushed the icc prosecutor to undertake a formal probe consistent with the court’s statute and welcomes the decision by the prosecutor to seek arrest warrants in the situation in the state of palestine. the prevention of return can also amount to the crime against humanity of “other inhumane acts,” using the standard set out by an icc pre trial chamber in the bangladesh/myanmar situation when it causes great suffering, or serious injury to mental or physical health, and is committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack on a civilian population, pursuant to a state policy to commit the crime. human rights watch calls on the prosecutor to investigate israeli authorities’ forced displacement and prevention of the right to return as a crime against humanity. human rights watch calls on all governments to publicly support the icc and uphold the court’s independence, and publicly condemn efforts to intimidate or interfere with its work, officials, and those cooperating with the institution. above all, human rights watch calls on israel to urgently and immediately end the mass and forced displacement of palestinians in gaza. this report is based on interviews with 39 internally displaced palestinians in gaza. twenty two interviewees are male and seventeen are female. all 39 interviews were conducted between november 2023 and june 2024. interviews were conducted by telephone in private settings   either completely alone or with the interviewees’ immediate family members present   with assurances of confidentiality. the researcher informed all interviewees about the purpose and voluntary nature of the interviews, and the ways in which human rights watch would use the information. all were told they could decline to answer questions or could end the interview at any time. the researcher told interview subjects they would receive no payment, service, or other personal benefit for the interviews. interviews were conducted in arabic using an interpreter and in english if the interviewee spoke english. to protect confidentiality, pseudonyms are used for all interviewees, except for two who are featured in human rights watch videos. human rights watch collected and analyzed 184 evacuation orders that the israeli government posted between october 8, 2023 and august 31, 2024 to official social media accounts, airdropped as leaflets, or delivered by sms to the residents of gaza.[1] there is no official data confirming how many evacuation orders were made in the time period covered in this report. the official social media platforms monitored include the x and facebook accounts of lt. col. avichay adraee, the israeli military’s spokesperson in arabic, and the facebook account of the coordinator of the government activities in the territories (cogat), the military body responsible for coordinating humanitarian aid into gaza. these accounts constitute the principal channels through which evacuation orders were shared on social media. given that the x account of lt. col. adraee posted the largest number of evacuation orders, predominantly earlier in the day than other accounts, researchers used it as the primary channel of communication to document evacuation orders issued by israel and documented when the evacuation orders were posted, how much warning they gave people, if any, and where people in various locations were being told to relocate. in addition, human rights watch searched across social media platforms and the websites of news agencies to find photographs of leaflets. we were unable to verify all the exact dates, when, and locations where leaflets were airdropped, but we aimed to find at least two different sources for the same leaflet to compare the dates they were posted online and where they were reported to have been airdropped. human rights watch reviewed the photographs of leaflets to assess their authenticity by reviewing that the fonts and logos matched those used by the israeli military and uploaded them on reverse image search engines to check that they were not posted online prior to the date they were believed to have been delivered. human rights watch was not able to collect an exhaustive list of israeli evacuation orders because of the high number of phone calls, sms messages, radio messages, and leaflets airdropped, and our lack of access to gaza. human rights watch analyzed dozens of high  and very high resolution satellite images since october 7, 2023, to document and verify the locations, times, and impacts of many of the attacks included in this report. this allowed us to monitor the damage to residential areas and civilian infrastructure across different governorates in gaza and track the displacement of the civilian population to temporary, safer areas. additionally, human rights watch, utilized derived geospatial datasets generated by un agencies and mapping groups to assess the scale and extent of destruction across time. human rights watch analyzed and verified 19 photographs and 19 videos posted online of attacks across gaza. researchers compared visual material to satellite imagery to identify exactly where each was recorded, and compared shadows and other time identifiers to determine when the footage was taken. going frame by frame in the videos, human rights watch observed nine people who had been killed including at least one child and one older woman, as well as people who were injured, or in other ways harmed, as well as buildings, vehicles, and roads that had been damaged. in some cases, human rights watch reviewed and corroborated media reports and investigations which included photographs and videos found online to document findings included in this report. individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the occupying power or to that of any other country, occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive.[2] ― fourth geneva convention, article 49 israel has been occupying the west bank, including east jerusalem, and gaza   known as the occupied palestinian territory (opt)   since 1967. contrary to israeli government claims, the withdrawal of its ground forces from gaza in 2005 did not end its occupation.[3] in fact, with the exception of gaza’s border with egypt,[4] israel has continuously maintained effective control over gaza, including its territorial waters and airspace, the movement of people and goods, and the infrastructure upon which gaza relies. israel has effectively rendered gaza an open air prison.[5] israel’s 17 year closure of gaza has devastated its economy, exacerbated social and political tensions, and isolated and fragmented its people. even prior to the recent hostilities, the effects of the closure and other restrictions cumulatively established a pattern of israeli dominance and abuse that amounts to the crimes against humanity of apartheid and persecution.[6] article 49 of the fourth geneva convention, which regulates the displacement of protected persons in occupied territories during hostilities, restricts the forced movement of people by an occupying power during conflicts.[7] it prohibits the forcible transfer of civilians within a territory and the deportation of civilians outside of occupied territory. both categories of displacement fall under the prohibition of forced displacement.[8] article 49 states: individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the occupying power or to that of any other country, occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive.[9] forced displacement takes place where the individuals are compelled to move without their genuine consent, by means of force or coercion, from the area in which they are lawfully present.[10] forcible transfer within a territory does not necessarily require physical force; it includes threats, coercion, or other forms of duress that leave the victims with no real choice but to leave.[11] in assessing the way civilians have been forced to move within gaza since october 7, this report will refer to forcible transfer and forced displacement interchangeably. an occupying power may temporarily evacuate civilians for their security or imperative military reasons. in this case, however, article 49 specifies that the occupying power: the extent and application of these exceptions is subject to a degree of interpretation, especially as article 49 states that an occupying power should adhere “to the greatest practicable extent” to the protections listed, but certain principles have been clearly established by courts, tribunals, and international humanitarian law (ihl) commentaries.[13] these include that the displacement must occur in a manner consistent with returning the population after the threat is no longer present and consistent with the protection of civilians’ human rights. in addition, if displacement is conducted in an “atmosphere of terror,” it negates any claim that the evacuation was for imperative military reasons.[14] the geneva conventions are clear that evacuated civilians must be treated humanely and that the occupying power ensures their safety and that they are provided with adequate shelter, food, water, and medical care. the international committee of the red cross (icrc) commentary adds that: this wording is intended to cover the contingency of an improvised evacuation of a temporary character when urgent action is absolutely necessary in order to protect the population effectively against an imminent and unforeseen danger. if the evacuation has to be prolonged as a result of military operations and it is not possible to return the evacuated persons to their homes within a comparatively short period, it will be the duty of the occupying power to provide them with suitable accommodation and make proper feeding and sanitary arrangements.[15] israel is bound by the laws of war to act in a manner which minimizes civilian harm. on october 7, referring to gaza as a “city of evil” that israel would reduce “to ruins,” israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu announced: all the places where hamas is organized, of this city of evil, all the places where hamas hides, operates from   we will turn them into cities of ruins. … i say to the residents of gaza: get out of there now, because we will act everywhere and with all the strength.[16] at the first provisional measures hearing at the international court of justice on january 12, 2024, legal counsel for israel stated that “israel is in a war of defense against hamas, not against the palestinian people.”[17] another lawyer representing israel argued that civilian harm was both inevitable in gaza, and that hamas was to blame: “urban warfare will always result in tragic deaths, harm and damage, but in gaza these undesired outcomes are exacerbated because they are the desired outcomes of hamas.”[18] regardless of its stated objectives, israel is bound by the ihl rules on the conduct of hostilities. those rules set out the obligations of each party to a conflict and take into account the conduct of the adversary, including during fighting in population centers. forced displacement is not the unavoidable result of the lawful conduct of hostilities but a clear violation of israel’s own obligations. under ihl, in circumstances where israel intends to displace civilians, it is permitted to do so only in cases where it can demonstrate this is necessary for the security of the civilians involved or for a “military imperative.” the concept is narrowly defined in order to prevent abuse, ensuring that any such actions are justified by urgent military needs and do not contravene other ihl principles aimed at protecting civilians. it has been noted that “courts have set a high threshold for accepting imperative military reasons as a justification, only doing so when civilian evacuations are deemed vital to the success of broader military operations.”[19] for instance, this might include situations where civilian areas need to be evacuated to avoid casualties during intense combat operations or to clear a zone for a critical military operation where the presence of civilians would significantly impede military objectives. for there to be an imperative military reason, it must be “overriding.”[20] human rights watch wrote to the israeli military requesting information as to whether israel had an imperative military reason or a reason related to the security of the population, to immediately displace most of the population in gaza. we did not receive any substantive response. on october 10, the israeli military spokesman, r. adm. daniel hagari, said in a public statement that “while balancing accuracy with the scope of damage, right now we’re focused on what causes maximum damage,” and that israeli attacks to date had already used “thousands of tonnes of munitions.”[21] in any event, in each case of attack and evacuation, israeli commanders are required to consider all alternatives to displacement and to minimize the impact to civilians where displacement was deemed unavoidable.[22] notably, israel has had complete control over the timing of the bombardment and associated displacement. with regard to the first mass evacuation orders issued on october 13, 2023, for example, a military imperative would likely not only require israel to show that the mass evacuation of most palestinians in northern gaza was unavoidable, but also that it was required immediately. israeli decision makers had to be certain there were no possible options for a more deliberate and orderly evacuation plan for it to achieve its military objectives. it is important to note that it does not need to amount to the mass evacuation of the entire population of northern gaza to potentially involve an act of forced displacement; the forcible transfer of even one individual can constitute a war crime under ihl. even if an imperative military reason existed, the evacuations on october 13, 2023 and subsequent evacuations would still amount to forced displacement because of the immense harm suffered by the civilian population in gaza, including an absence of meaningful efforts by israel to erect safeguards to ensure that humanitarian needs would be met. to the contrary, israel’s policy of starving the population[23] while displacing them demonstrates a failure to protect civilians and further proof that the evacuation orders amount to forced displacement.[24] exacerbating the impact on displaced people of the overall siege of gaza, during the over one year of hostilities, the israeli military has repeatedly ordered palestinians to move to areas where civilian infrastructure was either not scaled for a large population, such as the al mawasi “safe zone,” in previously sparsely populated areas near the seashore, or where previous rounds of bombardment and fighting had extensively damaged and destroyed civilian infrastructure, leaving the displaced with utterly inadequate access to water, food, medical care, and shelter. additionally, israel cannot plausibly claim it is conforming to permissible exceptions of military necessity and civilian safety if it forcibly displaces civilians in a manner inconsistent with returning the population after the threat is no longer present. as this report will show, the widespread destruction throughout gaza renders return almost impossible, at least in the foreseeable future. any widespread or systematic displacement not justified by imperative military reasons or safety of civilians would constitute forced displacement and if found to be widespread or systematic, pursuant to a state policy, a crime against humanity. israel launched a massive military campaign in gaza hours after armed groups, principally the military wing of hamas, carried out their attacks on israeli civilians in southern israel on october 7, 2023, which included the commission of war crimes and crimes against humanity.[25] israel attacked locations throughout gaza, from beit lahiya in the north to rafah in the south. on october 7, prime minister benjamin netanyahu stated that the country was “at war,”[26] and the government officially proclaimed a “state of war” the following day. yoav gallant, the israeli minister of defense, ordered a complete siege of gaza on october 9, stating there would be “no electricity, no food, no fuel, everything is closed…we are fighting human animals, and we act accordingly.”[27] this was followed by a statement from then minister of energy, israel katz, on the same day confirming the extreme blockade of gaza and the severance of basic goods necessary for rights essential public services to function: “i ordered that the water supply be immediately cut off from israel to gaza. electricity and fuel were cut off yesterday. what was will not be.”[28] on october 10, gallant said of israel’s war plans: this is the isis of gaza. this is what we are fighting against. gaza won’t return to what it was before. we will eliminate everything [even] if it doesn’t take one day, it will take…weeks, or even months, we will reach all places.[29] human rights watch interviewees described watching in horror as their residential buildings and surrounding areas came under attack. they recounted their escape in panic, amidst scenes of carnage and destruction, having themselves suffered or witnessed injuries and seeing their loved ones killed. most said they saw airstrikes and bombardments and heard hostilities behind and ahead of them as they fled. at the time, the israeli military spokesperson, r. adm. daniel hagari, declared their intention to “restore security to the people of israel” stating that “hamas are hiding among gazan civilians, inside gazan homes and schools, hospitals and mosques… israel will target hamas and islamic jihad terrorists wherever they will be in gaza. we will do whatever it takes…”[30] anas, a 48 year old man with a physical disability from al zeitoun neighborhood, south of rimal and north of wadi gaza, described how a building he estimated was one meter from his home, and a few meters from a nearby market, was hit in the morning of october 9.[31] anas said he did not receive a warning before this attack, which took place before the general october 13, 2023 evacuation order.[32] he said he had to pull himself and several of his seven children from the rubble of his home: it was maybe 10:30 a.m., my wife was up and preparing breakfast, we were just doing our daily routine   suddenly we heard a huge noise. there was so much dust. i didn’t know what was happening. i couldn't see much because of the dust.… i had to clear myself from the rubble. i started pulling my kids from the rubble.[33] two of anas’ children had gone to the market that morning to buy sweets: i went looking for my missing kids, looking all over the place, asking my neighbors. it was chaos. people were telling me different things. some were saying they were under the rubble. it took me from 10:30 a.m. until 1:00 a.m. the next day to find out where they were. i found out eventually that some people had taken my daughter to al shifa hospital. she had shrapnel in her eyes and her leg was injured.[34] after finding both of his children, anas sought shelter in a relative’s home, four streets away from his own. four days later, another apparent israeli attack flattened a building 200 meters from that place, he said, forcing them to flee to another location.[35] by the time israel issued its first mass evacuation order on october 13, 2023, government officials had already stated that they intended to enforce a total siege that would make civilians unable to meet their humanitarian needs. declaring that israel would “continue to tighten the siege until the hamas threat to israel and the world is removed,” then minister of energy katz on october 11 said: for years we supplied gaza with electricity, water, and fuel. instead of saying thank you, they sent thousands of human animals to slaughter, murder, rape and kidnap babies, women and the elderly   that’s why we decided to stop the flow of water, electricity and fuel and now their local power station has collapsed and there is no electricity in gaza.[36] the un special rapporteur on internally displaced persons, paula gaviria betancur, estimated that 423,000 people had already been forcibly driven from their homes before october 13, 2023.[37] on october 13, 2023, the israeli military ordered all the residents of northern gaza   more than a million people   to evacuate to the south.[38] written in broad and compulsory terms, instructing the population to leave the entire area of northern gaza, this directive served as an order to evacuate rather than a specific warning of an imminent attack. they issued this order by airdropping leaflets, posting on social media channels, on television broadcasts, and through text messages and phone calls.[39] just before midnight on october 12, team leaders of the un office of the coordination of humanitarian affairs and the department of safety and security in gaza were told by israeli military that this evacuation would have to take place within twenty four hours.[40] human rights watch could not find this time period referenced in other evacuation orders delivered on october 13, 2023 and israeli military spokesperson lt. col. peter lerner told cnn that any deadline “may slip.”[41] israel justified the mass evacuation order as being for the safety of the civilian population and stated military reason for displacing the population was centered on the presence of hamas fighters and military infrastructure, including hamas’ extensive tunnel infrastructure, which the israeli military identified as a threat.[42] israel’s evacuation order claimed that hamas fighters were utilizing civilian areas for military purposes, thereby necessitating the displacement of civilians to minimize casualties during military operations. on the same day, however, the israeli president, isaac herzog, stated: it is an entire nation out there that is responsible. this rhetoric about civilians not aware, not involved, it’s absolutely not true. they could’ve risen up; they could have fought against that evil regime...[43] un secretary general antonio guterres issued the following statement calling on the israeli authorities to rescind the order: [the] order by the israel defense forces to palestinians in gaza to evacuate their homes within 24 hours was dangerous and deeply troubling. any demand for a mass evacuation on extremely short notice could have devastating humanitarian consequences. the evacuation order applies to approximately 1.1 million people. it applies to a territory that is already besieged, under aerial bombardment and without fuel, electricity, water, and food…. as secretary general of the united nations, i appeal to israeli authorities to reconsider.[44] the un special rapporteur on internally displaced persons condemned the evacuation order as a potential crime against humanity and a violation of international humanitarian law: forcible population transfers constitute a crime against humanity, and collective punishment is prohibited under international humanitarian law… it is inconceivable that more than half of gaza’s population could traverse an active war zone, without devastating humanitarian consequences, particularly while deprived of essential supplies and basic services.[45] the october 13, 2023 order forms part of what human rights watch has termed an “evacuation system” that combines evacuation orders and directives to palestinians in gaza to move from their homes and other places of refuge to evacuation areas and warnings that specific areas or buildings would be under attack.[46] advance warnings are treated differently to evacuation orders under international humanitarian law (ihl). a warning relates to the ihl obligation to give advanced and effective warning of impending targeted attacks that might affect a civilian population, unless the situation does not permit it.[47] the primary purpose of advance warnings is to allow civilians sufficient time to leave an area or take cover to reduce civilian casualties and damage to civilian objects. advance warnings are typically issued shortly before an attack is carried out, assuming that the tactical situation permits such a warning without compromising the military operation. a lawful evacuation order is an exception to the general prohibition on arbitrarily displacing people from their homes and usually issued by a military or governmental authority for the removal of civilians from certain areas where there is a high risk of conflict or danger. these orders can be issued in anticipation of military operations that may last over a more extended period or in response to ongoing or expected threats, such as sustained bombings or other forms of hostilities. lawful evacuation orders would aim to safeguard the civilian population by moving them to safer locations. there is a legal requirement on parties to an armed conflict to remove civilians and civilian objects under their “control” from the vicinity of military objects, to the extent this is feasible.[48] in this way, advance warnings are specific to imminent attacks and aim to reduce harm from a specific operation. on the other hand, evacuation orders are broader, involving relocation due to sustained or significant threats. advance warnings are typically immediate and short term, linked to specific military actions. in contrast, evacuation orders may involve longer term displacement and are not necessarily linked to a single specific action. while linked, both correspond to different legal standards and the law on evacuation sets a much higher standard compared with the obligation to give an effective warning. an evacuation order is also an instruction. israel itself has argued that its practices form part of a coherent humanitarian effort to protect civilian lives and has explained this as part of its oral argument at the international court of justice’s provisional measures hearings on january 12, 2024: the idf [israeli military] maintains a civilian harm mitigation unit to undertake this task. it works full time to provide advance notice of areas in which the idf [israeli military] intends to intensify its activities, co ordinate travel routes for civilians and secure these routes. this unit has developed a detailed map so that specific areas can be temporarily evacuated, instead of evacuating entire areas…the idf [israeli military] also enacts localized pauses in its operations to allow civilians to move. it does this even though hamas does not agree to do the same and has even attacked idf [israeli military] forces securing humanitarian corridors…the idf [israeli military] employs a range of additional measures in accordance with the obligation to take precautionary measures under international humanitarian law. for example, it provides effective advance warnings of attacks where circumstances permit. to date, the idf [israeli military] has dropped millions of leaflets over areas of expected attacks with instructions to evacuate and how to do so, broadcast countless messages over radio and through social media warning civilians to distance themselves from hamas operations, and made over 70,000 individual phone calls, including to occupants of the targets, warning them of impending attacks.[49] while human rights watch notes that both evacuation orders and warnings fall under the umbrella of israel’s evacuation system, it is beyond the scope of this report to undertake an investigation of individual attacks that took place in gaza, the legality of these attacks, and the effectiveness of warnings given to people in the attacked locations. this report covers an assessment of the evacuation orders given by israel.[50] as already noted, the displacement of palestinians can only be justified as a lawful evacuation if there are imperative military reasons or if the security of civilians requires it. israel would also have to ensure that displacement protections were in place and that displacement occurred in a manner consistent with returning the population after the threat is no longer present and consistent with the protection of the civilians’ human rights. the following section presents human rights watch’s analysis showing that the evacuation system gave instructions through unreliable means that were unclear, inaccurate, and contradictory, making it very difficult for civilians to know where or when to move. where evacuation orders did suggest a destination or direction of movement, the orders gave far too little time for over one million people to move through what was already an active conflict zone; both the routes and the destinations were often unsafe. not only was there no safe place in gaza, but these destinations and routes also came under attack during hostilities. israel did not put in place protections. instead, through the widespread destruction of humanitarian resources, such as hospitals, bakeries, and agricultural land and its stated policy of cutting off all people in gaza from resources essential to the realization of their human rights, such as water and electricity, israel intentionally reduced the already limited ability of palestinian civilians in gaza to meet their own needs, leading to a humanitarian crisis where children are now dying from starvation.[51] israel’s widespread destruction of civilian infrastructure, including residential areas, agricultural land, and cultural buildings, rendering large parts of gaza uninhabitable, is also in direct conflict with its obligations to conduct its operations in a manner consistent with civilians returning. while israel has claimed that its “evacuation orders” were an attempt to protect palestinian civilians, our study reveals that…the “humanitarian measures” employed by the israeli military have failed to provide protection for the palestinian civilian population…but rather have amplified the forced transfer and mass displacement of palestinians.[52] ― forensic architecture, “humanitarian violence” this section will examine how israel’s evacuation system did not move palestinian civilians in conditions of “safety” as required by international humanitarian law (ihl).[53] israeli authorities used various platforms to disseminate evacuation orders. these can be classified into two categories: first, orders disseminated for passive reception, such as airdropped leaflets, phone calls, sms messages, or drone loudspeakers; second, orders people had to seek out actively by checking websites, social media platforms, or television and radio broadcasts. the blanket evacuation order, issued on october 13, 2023, contained one central instruction to residents of northern gaza: go south. israeli authorities disseminated this order on their official social media channels and television programs, through airdropped leaflets, and via phone calls and sms messages.[54] airdropped leaflets included a rudimentary map of gaza indicating where civilians should move.[55] subsequent evacuation orders became more specific, calling for particular neighborhoods to evacuate often along with maps with arrows pointing in the direction to flee. however, due to the size and scale of the maps shared, it was not always possible for the reader to know if they were in an area slated for evacuation. on december 1, the israeli military published an online map on its website, that could be accessed using a qr code from a mobile phone, that divided gaza into a grid of 620 numbered blocks, allowing the user to know in which of these blocks they are located, using the location services of their phone, assuming one had a phone with sufficient battery charge and internet connection.[56] the israeli military then continued to publish leaflets and social media posts indicating the blocks slated for evacuation.[57] .pdf { width: 100%; aspect ratio: 4 / 4; } .pdf, html, body { height: 100%; margin: 0; padding: 0; } between the first evacuation order on october 8, 2023 and august 31, 2024, human rights watch collected and analyzed 184 distinct evacuation orders that the israeli government posted to official social media accounts,[58] airdropped as leaflets, or delivered by sms to the residents of gaza. on march 13, 2024, forensic architecture, al mezan center for human rights, and al haq issued a joint report analyzing the israeli evacuation system from october 8, 2023 until february 16, 2024 and found that it “created confusion and panic by providing unclear, incorrect, inconsistent, elastic, unspecified, conflicting, and inaccessible instructions, formats, names and communication protocols.”[59] human rights watch research, presented below, supports these findings. our findings show that faulty information was rife across these orders they were often inaccurate or inconsistent across platforms and sowed confusion about when, where, and how people should evacuate. this resulted in a fearful and chaotic atmosphere that oftentimes put palestinians in harm’s way. on december 1, the day the online map was published, the un office for the coordination of humanitarian affairs (ocha) observed, “it is unclear how those residing in gaza would access the map without electricity and amid recurrent telecommunications cuts.”[60] almost immediately after october 7, 2023, telephone and internet services in gaza began experiencing significant disruptions.[61] continuous disruptions in communication networks are a result of damage to core communications infrastructure, cuts to electricity, fuel blockades, and apparently deliberate shutdowns through technical measures by israeli authorities.[62] telecommunications services in gaza had already been severely degraded since the start of the hostilities on october 7.[63] widespread phone and internet outages occurred in gaza on october 27, 2023, amid a concerted israeli bombardment, almost entirely cutting off the 2.2 million residents from the outside world.[64] since the start of the conflict, gaza has suffered multiple communication blackouts, usually the result of attacks impacting communications infrastructure.[65] the longest blackout lasted a week in january 2024 when all telecommunications services throughout gaza were down. on january 22, 2024, paltel, one of the largest telecommunication companies in the occupied palestinian territory (opt) and one of the few remaining operational providers in gaza, posted on x that telecom services in gaza were down for the tenth time since october 7, 2023.[66] these periods of blacked out telecom services lasted between one day to a week. during these blackouts, the israeli military continued to issue evacuation orders online. human rights watch found that the information contained in evacuation orders posted online was sometimes inaccurate and, in some cases, changed throughout the day, which would mean requiring constant connectivity and the foresight to check and recheck information. human rights watch found multiple discrepancies among the three main social media channels israeli authorities used to disseminate evacuation information.[67] for example, an october 21 evacuation order telling khirbet ikhza’a residents to move to al mawasi appeared only on the facebook account of the coordinator of the government activities in the territories (cogat), not on israel’s other two social media platforms.[68] this was the only order posted online that addressed residents of southern gaza at a time when evacuation instructions exclusively targeted those in the north. human rights watch identified 58 occasions in which an evacuation order posted on one social media channel was not posted on one or both of the other two channels.[69] ten of these posts contained crucial information, for instance announcing for the first time a new neighborhood or block slated for evacuation.[70] examples include an october 21 cogat facebook page announcement that warned that anyone within a newly designated “war zone” area within 1,000 meters of the border fence “puts their life in danger.”[71] it took another four days for this announcement to be posted on the israeli military’s arabic spokesperson’s x account[72] and it was never posted on his facebook account. in addition to the problems in the dissemination of evacuation orders outlined above, human rights watch found 16 instances where evacuation messages themselves contained missing or contradictory instructions as to the locations from which and to which people were meant to evacuate or where the labeling, marking, or wording on the maps accompanying the order did not align with the text.[73] in 12 cases, more than one error occurred on the same evacuation order.[74] on december 3, the israeli military posted an evacuation order on x at 6:36 a.m. with detailed information and a map showing residents in certain blocks in khan younis where they should go.[75] nearly nine hours later, at 2:58 p.m., the israeli military corrected the post with a new map showing a different area where civilians were directed to go.[76] other errors in the same december 3 evacuation order, however, remained uncorrected. the caption in the x post instructed people living in blocks 36, 38 through 54, and 219 through 221 to evacuate, but the heading on the map provided a different list of block numbers: 36, 47 through 54, and 221 through 219, which resulted in the omission of nine blocks. additionally, blocks 55, 99, and 104 were highlighted on the map despite not being listed either in the heading or the caption of the post.[77] according to population figures inadvertently included in the source code of the israeli military’s evacuation webpage, as previously reported by human rights watch, the blocks in khan younis listed in the heading on the map had a total population of 86,177 people.[78] based on this data there were approximately 23,452 people in the nine omitted blocks at the time the data was collected. there were also three additional blocks highlighted on the evacuation map that were not included in the caption or header, representing another 8,137 people. it is not known by human rights watch how current or accurate this population data is, however, according to these figures, it would mean that more than 31,000 people did not receive a comprehensive evacuation order. according to the un, the area designated for evacuation covered 20 percent of khan younis and had nearly 117,000 residents.[79] in 20 cases, highlighted areas on the maps did not cover blocks to be evacuated in a precise way and some blocks were only partially highlighted, rendering the question over who exactly should evacuate unclear.[80] on july 1, the israeli military issued an evacuation order for neighborhoods in eastern khan younis and rafah, including al fukhari where the european hospital, one of the largest hospitals in southern gaza, is located.[81] the next morning, the israeli military[82] and cogat[83] issued a clarification in english on their x accounts stating that the hospital was not subject to evacuation. the cogat arabic facebook page also updated the evacuation order post to include the clarification.[84] however, the israeli military’s arabic spokesperson did not share any of the clarifications on any of his social media accounts. the israeli military issued these clarifications hours after humanitarian groups had published pleas to rescind the order to evacuate the hospital, and news reports circulated online of the hospital being evacuated of patients, staff and essential equipment, for instance, on the back of large lorries.[85] by the time the clarifications were issued, staff and patients had reportedly already started to flee the hospital.[86] a report in the israeli newspaper haaretz noted that the map accompanying the december 3 evacuation order was rotated contrary to convention, with north positioned on the left, making the map “misleading.”[87] human rights watch also found that the subsequent block maps released by the israeli military were rotated in the same way and none of them included a north arrow, which is commonplace on maps in order to communicate their orientation to the user. in the absence of a north arrow, a map’s user would typically assume that the top of the map is north. however, since the maps’ rotations were distorted, this assumption was often invalid, creating additional confusion about the direction in which civilians should flee for their safety. for example, the june 27 evacuation order contains an arrow pointing to the evacuation area on the map and instructs people to move south. however, without the north arrow, a user could have perceived the instruction to move west   as the arrow is pointing to the left of the map   which is usually read as to the west on a conventional map.[88] a day after the israeli military issued the online map of the blocks, on december 2, they also issued a “neighborhood based map” on their website, which they removed later that same day.[89] separately, also on december 2, israeli military spokesperson, lt. col. adraee, posted an evacuation order on x for residents in the south and north of gaza.[90] the order was accompanied by five maps; each highlighted different blocks whose residents were instructed to evacuate and showing them, using arrows, where they should go. one of the highlighted areas that the maps visually instructed people to evacuate from included al fukhari neighborhood (this instruction was conveyed visually through the map but not specifically stated in the accompanying text).[91] yet less than 24 hours later, on december 3 and december 4, the same x account listed a well known idp shelter in al fukhari as one of the areas people should move to for their safety.[92] similarly, on july 7, the israeli military instructed residents of gaza to evacuate to “known shelters” in the west of gaza city.[93] less than 24 hours later on july 8, the israeli military this time ordered neighborhoods in the west of gaza city to evacuate to shelters in deir al balah, in the south.[94] an analysis published by cnn points to other flaws related to the aforementioned december 2 evacuation order posted by lt. col. adraee and the contradictions in israeli military guidance.[95] cnn’s analysis shows that certain blocks, such as blocks 720 and 717, are presented simultaneously as safe and unsafe on the two maps included in the same post calling for evacuation of residents in northern gaza. human rights watch reviewed and verified the time windows given to palestinians in gaza to evacuate and found irregularities that rendered the evacuation orders unpredictable and confusing. in total, 47 of the evacuation orders analyzed by human rights watch contained periods of time during which people were directed to evacuate, typically between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. or 10 a.m. and 4 p.m.[96] these included 46 orders on x and facebook, and one via airdropped leaflet. while at the beginning of the conflict, the evacuation messages often specified timeframes for evacuation, at later stages, evacuation timeframes were mostly omitted.[97] aside from the twenty four hour period provided to the un on october 12,[98] the longest time window identified by human rights watch was given overnight on november 5, with 10 hours 25 minutes,[99] and the shortest time window was 2 hours and 53 minutes, issued after the evacuation window had already begun on november 13.[100] of the 47 evacuation orders analyzed, 26 orders were posted online after the evacuation window had already begun.[101] the evacuation orders also included inconsistent, intermittently changing time windows to evacuate, making it hard for people to know when it was safe to move and plan for the following days. for instance, evacuation orders on october 13,[102] 14,[103] and 15,[104] told residents of gaza city a different time to move south along salah al din road, a major north south artery in gaza, warning them to be off the road by 8 p.m., 4 p.m., and 1 p.m., respectively. you must evacuate your homes immediately and go to the south of wadi gaza.   israeli military evacuation order, october 13, 2023 international humanitarian law (ihl) does not specify a precise amount of time that an evacuation order must give civilians to leave an area, but it would be reasonable to assume that palestinians in gaza should have been given orders to leave in a timely manner that were feasible to follow within that timeframe, allowing civilians enough time to evacuate safely. on october 13, israeli forces issued a general evacuation order to all residents in gaza north of wadi gaza. but even before this evacuation order was issued, a massive campaign of israeli air strikes had, as of that same day, already killed 1,900 people in gaza, including at least 583 children, according to the gaza health ministry.[105] israeli forces also issued additional evacuation orders to people in different areas of northern gaza that day, which had shorter or immediate time windows for evacuation. but in multiple cases, witnesses from different areas in northern gaza told human rights watch that israeli attacks commenced in their areas either before they received these evacuation orders, or within hours of receiving them, and that the bombardments made it impossible to evacuate, regardless of whether these orders instructed them to move immediately. civilians who remain in besieged or contested areas continue to retain their protection under the laws of war, even if they do not comply with evacuation orders.[106] this section will not assess the lawfulness of attacks in gaza, but the impact of the israeli military’s evacuation orders in midst of intense bombardments. ghassan, a 34 year old man, from the jabalia refugee camp in northern gaza   the largest of the eight refugee camps in gaza, with over 119,540 registered residents as of 2023, according to the united nations relief and works agency for palestine refugees in the near east (unrwa)[107]   said the israeli military airdropped leaflets on the camp at around noon on october 15, which he read, instructing people to evacuate for the south. he explained how he did not leave immediately because he did not know where to go, but that within a few hours, at 2:30 p.m., the israeli military started attacking the area with explosive munitions.[108] he described the desperation and panic of the moment: at 2:30 p.m. on the same day [october 15] the israeli military started bombing our area   our neighborhood [in jabalia]. after maybe two hours from [airdropping] the paper leaflets. when the bombing started, i started running towards my building but then i saw people running out of the building. i was trying to find my family, and i kept asking people about my family. people said probably they’ve gone to a small school nearby. but i couldn’t find them there. i was asking everyone and no one could help. there was no way to contact my family because the phones didn’t work.[109] as described earlier in this report, in october 2023, telephone and internet services in gaza were significantly disrupted. on the same night, ghassan took refuge in a car with his cousin next to an unrwa clinic and a post office in jabalia which he said was struck in an israeli airstrike shortly after he took refuge there: that night i was so close to death… i saw a bright light and i completely lost consciousness for maybe 40 seconds. when i woke up, i felt something was wrong, my body was heavy. my cousin was on the driver’s side. i tried to open the car door, my body was so stressed, it was hard to open the door. i got out of the car, and people were running to me. the israelis attacked the post office, and the car was parked next to it. i looked at my cousin; he had lost consciousness and was covered in blood. there were two ambulances and the people approached us to check on us. when i reached the ambulance, i opened the camera on my phone and saw myself full of shrapnel and blood. we didn’t know where the injuries were. people took me to the indonesian hospital; i had shrapnel in my back and face.[110] the fact that israeli forces began intense attacks in the jabalia refugee camp, apparently using explosive munitions with wide area effects, within a few hours of airdropping evacuation notices on the camp, could indicate that the israeli military did not give civilians enough time to evacuate the area. on october 16, ghassan left with his family to rafah and at the time of interview was living in a tent next to the sea, without access to adequate food, water or sanitation facilities, or medical care. omar, a 35 year old man with five children, aged between two and six, woke up at 5 a.m. on october 13 when his building in yarmouk street in north gaza came under attack by what he said were israeli airstrikes.[111] he said he did not receive an evacuation order before the airstrikes.[112] human rights watch confirmed that the october 13 general evacuation order was shared for the first time that day at 7:15 a.m., on israeli military spokesperson lt. col. avichay adraee’s facebook account.[113] in total, 39 members of omar’s family were inside the building at the time, of whom four were killed, including his six year old son, and 12 were injured, omar said: the first bomb hit in between our building and the one next door and exploded and the second went through our building. the house collapsed. when the [first] bomb hit, i jumped out of my apartment and was trying to leave. when the second hit, i was on the stairs in between the floors. i could see through the walls and through the house. i saw the body of one of my nieces that looked like she had been blasted from her apartment into a neighbor’s. my brother’s wife and kids and her aunt were all completely covered under the rubble. there was no way for us to take them to the hospital.[114] omar rushed those injured whom he could access to al shifa hospital in gaza city. his heavily pregnant wife suffered severe burns as well as several broken bones. at the time of interview, omar and his family were sheltering in a tent in a displacement camp in khan younis. given the military operation in khan younis in december 2023, it is likely omar and his family were subsequently forced to flee once again. sahar, a 42 year old woman with an 11 year old son, living in beit lahiya, a city in northern gaza close to israel, said she and her family left their home on october 14 “because of the excessive bombing to civilian houses, which killed entire families.”[115] she added, “the airstrikes were close to my house, so we didn’t have a choice but to leave.”[116] she said she received recorded telephone calls from the israeli military to leave and read airdropped paper leaflets, but the attacks had already started: yes, the leaflets and recorded calls were what i understood to be evacuation orders, and yes, we wanted to follow them, but could not because the israelis started bombing the area heavily even before the announcement. people were killed in huge numbers and in brutal ways.[117] sahar went on to recall her journey to the shelter in her town amid the bombardments: from my house to the shelter in our town, we went walking (around two kilometers), there were airstrikes while we were walking but we followed people and survived. in the shelter my child who is 11 years old knew that many of his friends and classmates were killed and he was terrified and kept thinking that he will be killed too. i tried to block all the news from reaching him, but we were in a place with zero privacy; everyone was talking about the deaths and the horrible situation in front of the kids.[118] it is clear from the above accounts together with many other interviews human rights watch conducted with palestinians in gaza, that the early days of the war in the lead up and immediate aftermath of the general evacuation order of october 13, were marked by terror, death, and panic as people had limited time to evacuate their homes amid continuous airstrikes and bombardments. human rights watch documented in two reports that israeli military also failed to provide adaptable evacuation procedures for children and adults with disabilities, who needed support to evacuate.[119] in june, the un commission of inquiry also found that israeli forces did not offer assistance to those who were unable to evacuate due to age, illness or disability or other status.[120] ghazal, a 14 year old girl with cerebral palsy, who had lost her assistive devices in an attack on her home on october 11, and who tried to follow the evacuation orders from october 13 to flee south described the difficulties she faced that eventually led her to beg her family to leave her behind: we had no idea where we were heading. that period was the hardest i’ve ever gone through. it feels like black memories i don’t want to hold onto because i don’t want to keep thinking about them. i was a burden on them [my family], an extra load alongside their belongings. i couldn't find any means of transportation. even people without disabilities struggled with the walk, so you can imagine what it was like for someone with a disability. we tried to grab onto any cart or vehicle on the road, but everyone was looking for help. eventually, my father decided to carry me on his shoulders. i refused and decided to push myself to walk on my feet for as long as possible. i felt at that moment that death was near. i gave up and sat on the ground in the middle of the road, crying. i told them to go on without me.[121] we have established a safe zone.[122]   prime minister benyamin netanyahu, november 10, 2023 nowhere is safe in gaza. not hospitals, not shelters, not refugee camps. no one is safe. not children. not health workers. not humanitarians.[123]   martin griffiths, united nations emergency relief coordinator, december 5, 2023 israeli authorities have not only issued evacuation orders that have been unclear, inconsistent, contradictory, and impossible to comply with in the allotted time, but it has also regularly failed to provide destinations or routes of travel that were safe. for these reasons, israel’s evacuations fail to meet the criteria in international humanitarian law (ihl) that would bring the displacement of palestinians in gaza within the lawful evacuation exemption for civilian security.[124] the un mandated independent international commission of inquiry on the occupied palestinian territory, including east jerusalem and israel, noted in its report of june 10, 2024, that “although isf [israeli security forces] did not use the specific term ‘safe zones’ in relation to the evacuation areas, it did advise civilians to move to these areas ‘for their safety,’ thereby effectively designating these as safe zones with the guarantee of safety for the civilians.”[125] interviewees told human rights watch that they and people around them were attacked in areas not subject to evacuation orders and on evacuation routes such as the salah al din road, the main highway that runs between the north and south of gaza. survivors of these journeys then said they came under attack in areas that evacuation orders had directed people to flee to. even if some or all of these attacks might have been lawful under ihl, they demonstrate israel’s failure to ensure safe evacuations. overall, these evacuation directives resulted in more fear and an egregiously unsafe forced displacement, than to ensure a temporary evacuation in line with humanitarian principles. amina received the october 13 general evacuation order to northern governorates to leave for the south of gaza. she said she chose that day to go to khan younis as she believed it was far away from the north and would be safe: my older brother took me and my family from our house to khan younis. on the road there were thousands of people. we took the salah al din road. it is the road that connects our area [in rimal] to what they called safe areas, but it wasn’t safe and the roads also were not safe. when i passed the truck that had been transporting people to khan younis, i saw that it had already been attacked. the fire had been put out and there was a pile of five other affected cars [which had been on fire]. this caused a lot of traffic, the bodies of people who died in the bombing were piled on one side of the road and they were loading them into cars: i will never forget that sight in all my life.[126] the salah al din road is the main highway that runs north south through gaza. it extends over 45 kilometers, spanning the entire length of the territory from the erez crossing with israel in the north to the southern rafah crossing with egypt. the israeli military has consistently designated this major thoroughfare as a “safe passage” for people fleeing from the north to the south as they were instructed to do by evacuation orders.[127] investigations by media outlets,[128] previous reporting by human rights watch, and human rights watch interviews with palestinians in gaza together with analysis and verification of videos, photographs, and satellite imagery demonstrate that this route was rarely if ever safe, including the side roads and access routes that people had to use in order to reach the salah al din road. an al monitor article described it as the “passage of death.”[129] on september 9, 2024, unosat, the united nations satellite centre, released a satellite based comprehensive damage assessment of the state of road network in gaza based on an image recorded on august 18. the assessment reveals that 68 percent of the road network in gaza has been damaged, including salah al din road and the other main safe passage route, al rashid coastal road, which roughly parallels salah al din road to the west. as of august 18, 37 kilometers, more than 80 percent, of salah al din road appears damaged.[130] in nearly all instances investigated, israeli orders to evacuate via salah al din road provided a time window of less than two hours to evacuate, were vague, inconsistent, and were contradicted by the reality on the ground. for example, evacuation leaflets airdropped on october 13 provided no time frames in which residents could use the salah al din road as a safe and designated route to evacuate. on the same day at 6:03 p.m., the israeli military posted on its x account that residents had until 8 p.m. to use the salah al din road, meaning residents had less than two hours in which to access the information online,   if they had access at all, given the power and network outages described in the previous section of this report   make their escape plans, and carry them out.[131] over the following month, orders were issued to palestinians that gave different time frames in which to use the road, such as between 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. on october 14, 2023,[132] 10:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. on october 15, 2023,[133] 8:00 a.m. and 12 p.m. on october 16, 2023,[134] 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. on november 5, 2023,[135] then again from 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. on november 9, 2023,[136] and 9:00 a.m. and 4 p.m. on november 14, 2023.[137] these timeframes were unrealistic, given the conditions on the ground as many interviewees described their journey along the salah al din road taking far longer than usual due to traffic congestion caused by the sudden mass movement of people, residents forced to walk due to other transportation means being inaccessible, and newly established checkpoints. rami, a 34 year old man living in jabalia with his wife and three children, said he and his family left their home on october 13, 2023, after receiving automated telephone calls from the israelis to leave the area in which their home was located and head south immediately.[138] “the dark irony is that they were bombing the area since october 7,” he said, “and after a whole week of that [the israeli military] told us to leave.”[139] he described the salah al din road journey: we were not attacked directly, but many bombs were dropped in spots behind us and very close to us; one of them was less than 100 meters away. we could hear the airstrikes all the time. the salah al din road usually takes one hour but it took us three hours because of the traffic. people were walking in the middle of the road and there were many burning cars and houses on the sides of the road. i took another [stranded] family from the road with us in my car, i wish i could have done more.[140] interviewees said the situation on the ground was chaotic, and people with disabilities, children, and older people were moving among the large groups of displaced people. the pervasive fear of being caught up in israeli airstrikes persisted, underscoring the grave risks associated with the evacuation. youssef, a 30 year old man, said that his family sought refuge in a school in al shati (“beach”) refugee camp after an israeli airstrike hit in front of his house on october 9.[141] he fled the area with his heavily pregnant wife and two children on november 9 after israeli bombardments struck increasingly close to the school: the night we decided to leave, we were hit by different missiles… [near] the school. everyone left the school that day. a lot of places surrounding the school were hit and the school was damaged. it took us five hours on foot [to get to the south]. we had to hold white flags from our place in the school to al shifa and then to al remal street and then to the salah al din road. we walked with a lot of injured people. the bombings were happening around us and i saw people injured on the way.[142] as the war progressed, and the israeli ground invasion advanced into gaza, israeli armored military vehicles reached this crucial road by the end of october and installed checkpoints demarcating the front line and establishing a dividing line between the north and the south.[143] a video, shared by the israeli military on november 9, 2023, shows hundreds of people walking on the salah al din road waving white flags. many of them are shown walking with both arms up in the air and passing an israeli armored vehicle.[144] bbc verify geolocated this video and found the armored vehicle in the same position on satellite imagery captured on november 7, 2023.[145] several interviewees spoke of degrading treatment at checkpoints along the salah al din road as they evacuated per the israeli authorities’ instructions. leila, a 40 year old woman from al zeitoun neighborhood of gaza city who uses a wheelchair, described her humiliating treatment at the hands of israeli soldiers at a checkpoint at al kuwait roundabout, where she and her family were attempting to access the salah al din road: we were searched and humiliated at the roundabout and the israelis were talking and insulting us with terrible words. the israeli soldiers used words and insults to hurt us, including shouting “walk you donkeys!” they used this word all the time and at everyone passing through the checkpoint. the israeli soldiers asked me to show my identity card when i passed and even though he saw me in a wheelchair, they stopped me. i was tormented until i reached the last checkpoint.[146] leila received an evacuation order via an airdropped leaflet from the israeli authorities on november 8, 2023. it instructed the residents of al zeitoun neighborhood to leave between 7 a.m. and 2 p.m.[147] leila explained that she could not flee immediately. on november 9, 2023, leila said her building was targeted in an israeli airstrike which badly damaged the third floor of her building.[148] she explained that everyone on the third and second floors took refuge on the first floor and waited till the following day to flee. “on that day between eight and nine people were injured   mostly children   from shrapnel and many people were injured mentally,” she said.[149] as she huddled in a room, leila said the blasts had contaminated the air and she breathed in something “very aggressive that led to a chest infection.”[150] leila started her journey when there was a pause in the bombardments on november 10, 2023. she said she saw an israeli soldier firing on her group as they tried to reach the road: we escaped at 6:00 a.m. as soon as we left the house, an israeli sniper started shooting at us from between the houses, quickly and it was terrifying. i saw the sniper with my eyes firing at us.[151] leila eventually made it to rafah where she was living in a tent with 15 other family members at the time of our interview. saleem, a 29 year old man who was living in nuseirat, an area south of wadi gaza, before the hostilities broke out, said he was taking care of his 14 brothers during the hostilities. he said he received automated calls from the israeli authorities to leave the area, but these came after an israeli airstrike hit his neighbor’s house, which caused damage to his house and injured one of his brothers: we left on foot because we did not have a car. the roads were not safe. there was an israeli bombing nearby, which we luckily survived. one bomb that did not explode fell less than 30 meters from me and my brothers. we walked the whole road from al nuseirat to alkiam in deir al balah.[152] saleem now lives in a tent in deir al balah, struggling to survive and provide for his 14 younger brothers. as israeli ground operations intensified, tanks and armored vehicles were reported in the north. families fleeing from heavily hit areas had to navigate past israeli tanks.[153] adding to the ordeal, displaced people had to walk significantly longer and more difficult distances because of damaged roads. on december 11, 2023, the israeli military called on palestinian residents who remained north of wadi gaza to leave southwards through a “corridor” along salah al din road between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. however, this stretch of the road running north and east of khan younis city reportedly experienced intense battles at this time, making movement hazardous and difficult.[154] salah al din road was closed to civilians on january 4, 2024, and al rashid coastal road was designated as a safe passage route instead. in such circumstances, israeli forces could have taken steps, if there was time, to tell palestinians not to use that route for evacuations, and provided a safe alternative route, and/or delayed plans to attack the areas civilians were to be evacuated from. media reports included description of israeli attacks on evacuation convoys and evidence of what appeared to be extrajudicial killings of women, men, and children attempting to evacuate. on october 13, 2023, msnbc news reported that 70 people, mostly women and children, were killed as they evacuated in three convoys, citing the gaza ministry of health and interviews.[155] a video posted to social media on november 3, 2023 that was verified by reuters and corroborated by human rights watch, showed the bodies of at least seven people, including at least one child, lying on al rashid coastal road south of gaza city, one of the two main roads considered as an evacuation route as described in the previous section, which was under attack by israeli forces.[156] middle east eye received and verified footage showing 57 year old hala khreis being shot and killed on november 12, 2023 by an israeli gunman as she was holding the hand of her 5 year old grandson, who was waving a white flag in his other hand.[157] the icrc said that her group had been ordered to evacuate their northern gaza home and was taking an evacuation route that had been “cleared” by the israeli military.[158] itv news published footage filmed by one of its camera operators on january 22, 2024 outside al aqsa university in al mawasi. it shows five men with their hands in the air, one of whom is holding a white flag.[159] the camera operator interviews one of the men, ramzi abu sahloul, who explains that they are trying to reach his mother and brother. he says that the israeli military did not allow his brother to evacuate. the camera operator leaves and the group comes under fire; abu sahloul is shot dead. nbc news investigated and verified the incident.[160] its report included a statement from ahmed hijazi, a palestinian videographer, who said the bullets came from one of the nearby israeli tanks.[161] forensic architecture documented the movement of tanks near the university at the time of incident. brig. gen. dan goldfuss confirmed to abc news that his troops fired the shots and confirmed that the incident was being investigated.[162] the investigation’s findings have not been published at the time of writing this report. human rights watch confirmed that the university building was located within al mawasi humanitarian zone   the boundaries of which the israeli military had set on december 6, 2023. a day after the incident, on january 23, 2024, an evacuation order instructed residents of khan younis neighborhoods to move to this area.[163] on january 29, 2024, two brothers who were holding white flags were reportedly shot and killed by an israeli military sniper while trying to flee khan younis in the south of gaza. al jazeera’s sanad verification agency investigated the incident and verified footage provided by the family of the two brothers dead in the street.[164] on november 10, 2023, prime minister netanyahu said that israel was not seeking to displace anyone, but added that “[israel is] trying to…get the gazans in the northern part of the gaza strip where the fighting has taken place to move one to four miles south where we have established a safe zone.”[165] prime minister netanyahu went on to say, “we want to see field hospitals. we’re encouraging and enabling humanitarian help to go there.”[166] a november 16, 2023 statement from the heads of 18 of the world’s major un and related humanitarian agencies outlined the minimal conditions for a safe zone: the statement went on to say, “failure to meet these basic conditions may constitute a breach of international humanitarian and human rights law.”[168] israel cannot rely on the security and safety of civilians as a justification for evacuating people if there are no safe areas to which civilians can move. interviewees consistently told human rights watch that “evacuation areas” designated by the israel authorities came under attack from the israeli military.[169] they also recounted how they were unable to meet basic humanitarian needs. in early december 2023, james elder, spokesperson for the united nations children’s fund (unicef), told reporters in geneva via video link from cairo that safe zones in gaza, “are not possible,” adding, “i think the authorities are aware of this.”[170] he said, “it’s a safe zone when you can guarantee the conditions of food, water, medicine, and shelter. i’ve seen for myself these are entirely, entirely absent.”[171] all those interviewed by human rights watch were forced to flee multiple times, as evacuation orders proliferated across gaza. according to the un, as of october 2024 the total area covered by evacuation orders in gaza, excluding those that have been revoked, constitutes about 84 per cent of gaza.[172] the israeli military forced civilians to move into smaller and smaller areas, “for their safety.” the areas frequently changed, shifted, and became battle zones from which people were forced to flee again. the majority of palestinians in gaza took shelter in rafah until may 6, when the israeli military issued new evacuation orders[173] for rafah’s eastern neighborhoods and told people to seek refuge in the “expanded humanitarian area”[174] in al mawasi encompassing neighborhoods in khan younis, deir al balah, and rafah governates. by late may 2024, the un said that about one million palestinians had been displaced from rafah since israel launched its offensive.[175] interviewees uniformly told human rights watch they felt nowhere is safe inside gaza. since the early days of the war, un agencies, un experts, and humanitarian agencies have declared in the most powerful terms that nowhere in gaza is safe. on january 5, 2024, martin griffiths, the un under secretary general for humanitarian affairs and emergency relief coordinator said: gaza has become a place of death and despair… families are sleeping in the open as temperatures plummet. areas where civilians were told to relocate for their safety have come under bombardment. medical facilities are under relentless attack. the few hospitals that are partially functional are overwhelmed with trauma cases, critically short of all supplies, and inundated by desperate people seeking safety. for children, in particular, the past 12 weeks have been traumatic. no food. no water. no school. nothing but the terrifying sounds of war, day in and day out. gaza has simply become uninhabitable.[176] on april 26, an nbc news investigation into seven deadly airstrikes found palestinians were killed in areas of southern gaza “that the israeli military had explicitly designated as safe zones.”[177] on may 24, 2024, the international court of justice issued, for the third time, provisional measures as part of south africa’s case against israel under the genocide convention of 1948. as part of its order, the court specifically noted that: on the basis of the information before it, the court is not convinced that the evacuation efforts and related measures that israel affirms to have undertaken to enhance the security of civilians in gaza, and in particular those recently displaced from the rafah governorate, are sufficient to alleviate the immense risk to which the palestinian population is exposed as a result of the military offensive in rafah.[178] on august 22, muhannad hadi, the humanitarian coordinator for the occupied palestinian territory, recalled that “during august alone, the israeli forces have issued 12 evacuation orders   on average, once every two days   forcing as many as 250,000 people to move yet again” and concluded that: if evacuation orders are meant to protect civilians, the fact is that they are leading to the exact opposite. they are forcing families to flee again, often under fire and with the few belongings they can carry with them, into an ever shrinking area that is overcrowded, polluted, with limited services and   like the rest of gaza   unsafe. people are being deprived of access to services essential for their survival, including medical facilities, shelters, water wells and humanitarian supplies.[179] on august 26, un aid operations in gaza were forced to stop after the israeli military issued new evacuation orders for deir al balah in central gaza where the un operations center is located.[180] the evacuation order came as the un prepared to begin a campaign to vaccinate an estimated 640,000 children in gaza, where the who said a 10 month old baby had been paralyzed by the type 2 poliovirus,[181] the first such case in the territory in 25 years.[182] at the outset of the war, the israeli military issued evacuation orders telling people to go south. in certain cases, the orders told people to seek safety in khan younis.[183] while khan younis was initially designated as an evacuation area, gaza’s second largest city experienced a high level of israeli attacks and fatalities from the early days of the conflict, as demonstrated from ocha’s flash updates[184] and airwars, an ngo that investigates civilian harm in conflict zones.[185] dr. hassan, a 49 year old man, married with seven children, who was living in izbat abed rabo near jabalia in northern gaza before the war, described how he fled his home with his family in just their pajamas after receiving automated calls from the israelis to leave immediately for the south of gaza.[186] they fled to khan younis to a relative’s house where 36 people were living in a space of 100 square meters: two days before the ceasefire [in late november 2023], there were attacks on the municipality in al qarara, which is less than one kilometer from where we are [in my area of displacement]. i know the attacks were very close   we have a heavy iron door and it was damaged from the attacks. there are a lot of attacks in the [displacement] area and i do not think it is safe here. a lot of areas next to ours have been asked to evacuate   al qarara, alzana, absan, and alkzaa. the area i am in had an evacuation order before i arrived, but we have not been asked to evacuate again. i hope the area stays safe because i don’t know where we would go.[187] hisham, a 34 year old video journalist with two children who was living in north rimal street in gaza city when the war broke out, described how he had to flee his building when he received a notification to leave through one of his neighbors: the [automated israeli military] calls don’t come to each and every family. they go to neighbors and usually say that the person should tell others. it was such a mess. most people were terrified, screaming. it was hectic. the [warning to leave] call went to our neighbors. these are automated calls   saying you have to evacuate because the area is considered a war zone. usually you get a few days, but two days after we received the warning [from the neighbors] the targeting of the area started.[188] hisham first sought refuge with his family at a friend’s home next to al shifa hospital. he was forced to flee this area when he said a neighbor’s house was hit in an israeli airstrike.[189] he said a neighbor had received an automated call from the israeli military instructing them to leave, but the attack happened only five minutes later.[190] hisham and his family survived the attack. “the pressure of the bomb caused damage [to his friend’s home] and people were injured from shrapnel.…it was 2 a.m. at sunrise, we decided [my family] needed to separate and try to get to a safe place,” he said.[191] hisham decided to move further south to khan younis where he stayed until the end of october 2023. in november 2023, he was forced to flee once again as the israeli military operation progressed towards the south of gaza: the israelis said khan younis was a safe place. it was a farming area   there was no reason to attack the area. but they started bombing this area and the farms. i took a decision to leave and go to rafah… the emotional state of the kids   what they witnessed in the last area, they are in shock, they are terrified. they jump at small sounds now. it was so hard for me to get my family from the last place to here. most of the areas were closed by the israelis as they were considered battle areas.[192] the israeli military began ground operations around khan younis in southern gaza in december 2023. israeli tanks cut off the road between khan younis and deir al balah in central gaza, effectively dividing gaza into three parts.[193] the campaign in khan younis involved both bombardments of suspected hamas targets and a ground offensive, leading to significant casualties and damage to infrastructure. the city, which had swelled with displaced individuals seeking refuge, found itself at the heart of some of the most intense fighting witnessed since the conflict's onset in october. throughout this period, international observers and humanitarian organizations expressed concern over the escalating violence and its impact on the civilian population, highlighting the dire humanitarian situation in khan younis and broader gaza. on december 1, 2023, the israeli military issued an evacuation order for eastern neighborhoods in khan younis but at the same time declared the whole area a “combat zone.”[194] this confusing articulation left people living outside of the eastern neighborhoods unsure how to respond. declaring an area a combat zone without the concomitant instructions of where and how to evacuate does not constitute an evacuation order. rashad, a 31 year old man living in khan younis, explained how his home had become a shelter for scores of displaced people: “i live with my mother, father, brother, wife, and two kids but now we have 80 displaced people living with us.”[195] he said there were 25 children under the age of seven living in his home.[196] human rights watch spoke to rashad on december 1, just as he received an israeli evacuation order warning that khan younis was considered a combat zone: the israeli evacuation leaflet says the whole area of khan younis is considered a combat zone. then it says it is a “formal warning.” i am unwilling to go anywhere. wherever we go will change again. we were told [by the israeli military] to go to khan younis and now they are saying this isn’t safe, and to move to rafah. there is no other place to go in the shelters in rafah. and today there were civilian houses hit in rafah and 30 causalities and this area is not safe for anybody.[197] rashad told human rights watch that he was responsible for his family and other idps who were depending on him. human rights watch could not reach rashad again to find out if he and his household of idps managed to leave khan younis. as the israeli military offensive encircled khan younis, where it says many hamas leaders were based, people sought refuge further south and crowded into rafah. israeli military attacks in khan younis included strikes on hospitals and un facilities where thousands of displaced people from the north had been sheltering.[198] sara, a 37 year old psychologist with three children, was living in khan younis with her family when the war broke out. she opened her apartment to displaced relatives from gaza city, so 20 people were living there on december 7, 2023, when her residential building was damaged in an israeli airstrike that destroyed her relatives’ home, less than 10 meters away.[199] both buildings were in an area, block 108, that had not been marked for evacuation on the online israeli military map, so presumably were not considered to be dangerous.[200] sara said she went to work as normal that day but returned home to a scene of carnage: it was 4 p.m., and i was coming back from my job. this is when i saw the fire and the destruction, and there were people under the rubble [of my relatives’ home]... what i saw was a massacre. i arrived and it was hectic   everyone was screaming. i was scared because my kids were in my house [less than 10 meters away]. there was so much damage to my relatives’ building. this stopped me entering properly into it. a lot of people were injured. big, massive, injuries, the cousin of my husband was burned in her face and disfigured and the kids were either injured or killed that day. my family in my apartment were thank god okay. but we saw the bodies [in my relatives’ building], and people under the rubble, the emotional state of the kids was so bad. it changed us all.[201] sara said she had nowhere to go immediately after her home was damaged, so she left the next day and found shelter in an unwra school in khan younis with 8,000 to 9,000 other displaced people.[202] human rights watch spoke with sara again on february 19, 2024. “thank god we are still alive,” she said, explaining that she and her family had been forced to flee again, this time to rafah after the israeli offensive in khan younis.[203] “now we are sitting in tents in the extreme cold. my children are sick and our condition is bad. all necessities of life are lacking. and we are left with nothing,” she said.[204] human rights watch analyzed six photographs posted online and a video taken by agence france presse, geolocating the attack that destroyed sara’s relatives’ building and heavily damaged those adjacent in the same blast   including the building where sara and her family were living   by comparing landmarks in the photographs and videos with satellite imagery captured before and after the attack. by analyzing online evacuation orders and photographs of airdropped leaflets posted online, human rights watch established that block 108 was not slated for evacuation until january 23, 2024, six and a half weeks later.[205] a satellite image from december 7, 2023 at 12:09 p.m. local time displays no indications of damage to the building; an image captured on december 8, 2023, at 10:16 a.m. local time confirms the complete destruction of sara’s relatives’ building and severe damage to her building and to many nearby structures. the title card of the agence france presse video states it was recorded on december 7, 2023 and shows civilians recovering two injured women and one body from sara’s relatives’ destroyed building. an additional two more strikes are visible in the same timeframe on satellite imagery, occurring just dozens of meters from the attack that destroyed sara’s relatives’ home and severely damaged hers. the december 7 attack was not an isolated event to affect block 108; this area was subjected to multiple attacks prior to that date. human rights watch identified at least six additional strikes, before the attack on december 7, some likely involving large airdropped munitions as evidenced by satellite imagery. despite the recurrent attacks, block 108 was not designated for evacuation until january 23, 2024.[206] notably, several schools, including sheikh jaber unrwa school, are located within block 108. from late october onwards, numerous tents for displaced people were erected within the block’s school compounds. additionally, a field hospital was established at nasser stadium in mid december 2023, but it was dismantled around january 19, 2024, after only a month of operation. in the period following the evacuation order issued on january 23, 2024, satellite imagery analysis conducted by human rights watch shows a surge in attacks on the area   apparently from israeli airstrikes. the first visible impact of ground incursions and demolitions within block 108 appear on satellite imagery on february 3, 2024. a week later, the israeli military occupied sheikh jaber school and nasser stadium. over 70 percent of residential buildings within the block exhibit heavy damage or have been demolished by mid february. demolitions increased until the end of february 2024, including sara’s house that appears to have been reduced to rubble as seen in satellite imagery and in a video and three photographs sent directly to human rights watch. in october 2023, israel designated an area in al mawasi   a palestinian bedouin town on the southern coast of gaza   a “humanitarian zone.”[207] according to the un, the area is approximately one kilometer wide and fourteen kilometers long and is mostly barren and sandy.[208] there is no running water in al mawasi. since designating al mawasi a “humanitarian zone” the israeli military has defined different boundaries for the area on at least fourteen different occasions on its various communications channels.[209] on april 28, 2024, the area was expanded eastward to the salah al din road and northward to include most of deir al balah.[210] from july 22, 2024 onwards, claiming that the eastern part of al mawasi was used to launch rockets towards israel, the israeli military reduced the size of the humanitarian zone and urged people in the area eliminated to move to areas within the reduced zone.[211] between july 22 and august 25, the israeli military redefined and reduced the size of the boundaries of the “humanitarian zone” at least six times. it also redesignated at least 43 blocks within it as combat zones.[212] al mawasi humanitarian zone boundaries as defined by the israeli military between october 13, 2023 and august 31, 2024. the israeli military redefined the zone’s boundaries on at least 14 different occasions during this period. © 2024 copernicus sentinel data. analysis and graphics © 2024 human rights watch. israeli airstrikes and bombardments hit al mawasi humanitarian zone, as they hit other designated evacuation areas. on january 4, 2024, save the children, an international ngo, issued a press statement stating: fourteen people, the majority of them children under 10 years old, were reportedly[213] killed by israeli airstrikes near al mawasi this morning, an area designated a “humanitarian area”[214] by israeli authorities, to which israeli forces ordered civilians to evacuate for their safety.[215] the statement reiterated that there was nowhere safe in gaza: israeli forces have issued multiple so called “evacuation orders” since 7 october, primarily directing civilians to three areas in the south khan younis, rafah and al mawasi. all three have been subsequently hit by israeli airstrikes, with civilians, including children, killed, and injured.[216] jason lee, save the children’s country director of occupied palestinian territory, concluded: i cannot stress this enough: there is nowhere safe in gaza. but under international humanitarian law, there should be. camps, shelters, schools, hospitals, homes and so called “safe zones” should not be battlegrounds. yet gaza has been laid to waste. these relocation orders offer nothing more than a smokescreen of safety. if people stay, they are killed. if they move, they are killed. people are facing the “choice” of one death sentence or another.[217] various media outlets covered the january 4 airstrike. it hit displaced palestinians taking refuge in a house and tents in al mawasi. the attack killed 16 people, according to gaza’s health ministry,[218] although other sources reported the number to be 14 and 17.[219] human rights watch verified three videos and four photographs collected from news outlets and published on january 4, 2024, showing the aftermath of the strike and featuring interviews with witnesses. a 10 meter diameter crater, consistent with an airdropped munition is visible on a satellite image taken on the morning of january 5. a january 3 image shows no signs of damage. the videos and the photographs geolocated by human rights watch show this large crater along with severe destruction of nearby buildings and structures. the site of the attack falls within the boundary the israeli military defined for the humanitarian zone on december 6, 2023. human rights watch was not able to independently verify the number of casualties resulting from the attack. human rights watch also documented an attack carried out by israeli forces on a médecins sans frontières (msf) guest house in al mawasi.[220] on february 20, 2024, an israeli tank fired a medium to large caliber weapon at a multi story apartment building housing only msf staff and their families in al mawasi.[221] the attack killed two people and injured seven, according to a new york times investigation.[222] in a statement published on its website, msf said it had provided the coordinates of the building to israeli authorities and confirmed it neither saw military objects in the area prior to the attack, nor did it receive a warning that an attack was imminent from the israeli military.[223] human rights watch reviewed photographs and videos taken by sky news and msf and confirmed that a large msf flag was draped on the outside of the building at the time of the attack. researchers also verified a photograph msf posted on x on february 22, showing damage to the exterior of the building. the ground photographs and satellite imagery show that the msf building was secluded and that the nearest buildings were approximately 50 meters away. israeli authorities confirmed to sky news that they had received the coordinates, and explained that the army fired on the building because it had been “identified as a building where terror activity is occurring.”[224] the israeli military said it would conduct its own examination of the attack.[225] at the time of writing, no results have been made public. human rights watch verified and analyzed additional attacks on areas where displaced palestinians were sheltering in the area of al mawasi humanitarian zone defined on october 18. on march 10, 2024, israeli military attacked displaced families sheltering in al mawasi.[226] the attacks struck a farm owned by ziad abdel ghafour used as a shelter by families and killed 15 civilians including two people with disabilities and four children, according to a video interview with ghafour published to youtube by the palestinian centre for human rights.[227] human rights watch analyzed and geolocated four videos published by news outlets and collected from social media platforms which captured the aftermath of the attack. these showed the interior and exterior of severely damaged tents which had been sheltering people.[228] the videos show the front of a heavily damaged large tent that can accommodate several people, and two other tents with signs of fragmentation damage to its canvas. people’s belongings lay scattered, and blood stains are visible on pillows and mats inside one of the tents. satellite imagery analysis confirmed that the attack took place between march 9 at 10:40 a.m. local time and march 10 at 10:39 a.m. local time. additionally, in the area adjacent to these large tents, several impacts craters are visible where smaller tents once stood. human rights watch geolocated three videos posted on social media and by media outlets on march 10 showing people sorting through and packing their belongings amid destroyed tents and remains of burned objects in the aftermath of the attack. human rights watch was unable to independently verify the number of casualties resulting from the attacks. when the attack on the farm took place, it no longer fell within the defined area of al mawasi humanitarian zone according to the boundaries set on december 6   the closest date to the attack. it was, however, clearly within the humanitarian zone on october 18. human rights watch could find no communication from the israeli authorities through any medium directing people to evacuate from those areas within the humanitarian zone on october 18 that were excluded on december 6. on april 20, 2024, the israeli military attacked tents sheltering displaced people inside the boundaries of al mawasi humanitarian zone. human rights watch analyzed and geolocated a video posted to x by al jazeera palestine showing a large smoke plume, and four additional photographs of the aftermath of the attack posted to social media on april 20. by reviewing available satellite imagery and analyzing shadows visible in the video, human rights watch determined that the attack was carried out on april 20 between 5 p.m. and 6 p.m. within the humanitarian zone boundary established by the israeli military on december 6, the boundaries in effect at that time, according to public communications of the boundaries by the israeli authorities.[229] a satellite image taken on april 21 shows significant damage to tents, nearby greenhouses, and other structures at the site. there is no visible damage in a satellite image collected on the morning of april 20. human rights watch interviewees also described further attacks in al mawasi which they said were carried out by the israeli military. after escaping khan younis with his family, hisham sought refuge in al mawasi in a small tent near the beach. he said an israeli airstrike hit a building near the icrc office approximately 300 meters from his tent on january 8, 2024.[230] after four rounds of displacements between khan younis and rural rafah, asma, a 32 year old woman with four children who was originally living in beit lahiya in the north of gaza, eventually sought refuge in al mawasi. living in a 20 x 20 meter tent with 20 members of her family, she described daily airstrikes. “yesterday, it was 200 meters from us…we keep hearing the israeli air forces all the time in the sky above us,” she said.[231] asma finished the interview saying, “we live in a disaster, and we are hopeless, starving, and besieged.”[232] israeli evacuation orders predominantly instructed palestinians to go to south of wadi gaza to seek shelter and safety, at times specifying rafah, situated on the southern edge of gaza, or known shelters in the neighborhoods of rafah.[233] most interviewees told human rights watch they eventually sought refuge in rafah governorate after multiple displacements, including inside rafah itself. they described the terrifying situation they were experiencing as they were being interviewed: hundreds of thousands of people sheltering in cramped, crowded, and unsanitary conditions, either crammed inside apartment buildings, public facilities or united nations relief and works agency for palestine refugees in the near east (unrwa) schools, or in flimsy tented settlements along the beach front, and in farmlands. the majority of palestinians in gaza were sheltering in rafah until early may, when the israeli military issued new evacuation orders for rafah’s eastern neighborhoods and told people to seek refuge in the expanded humanitarian zone in al mawasi. by may 29, the un reported that around one million palestinians had been displaced from rafah since israel launched its offensive in the area on may 6.[234] on may 6, the israeli military ordered all eastern rafah neighborhoods to evacuate “immediately” and seek shelter in the al mawasi area of the governorate   an area that humanitarian organizations stated was not equipped to accommodate more displaced people.[235] the israeli military started airstrikes on eastern rafah that same day.[236] every interviewee human rights watch spoke to said they did not feel safe in rafah. after fleeing jabalia in the north, ziad described having to move with his family several times inside rafah governorate because of israeli airstrikes in the area: the israelis say rafah is safe. the building i’m staying in is on brazil street. the house in front of my building and behind it have been attacked. my family members were injured because of the shrapnel. i have family members who have lost their life in rafah   it is a joke that rafah is safe.[237] farah, a 38 year old woman, married with three children, was living in shaboura, a neighborhood of rafah, when the war broke out. she said she had not sought refuge elsewhere, explaining that israeli authorities had generally told people to go to rafah for their safety.[238] at the time of interview, farah was hosting 70 members of her and her husband’s extended family in her two bedroom house, who had been displaced from other areas in gaza. she explained there was not enough room to house so many people in such a small space and people had to take turns to sleep. farah said there had been israeli bombardments “200 to 250 meters from her home.”[239] on february 12, 2024, the israeli military said it had struck a number of “terror targets” in the shaboura district of rafah and the strikes had concluded.[240] various media outlets reported scores of fatalities. in a predawn operation on february 12, the israeli military rescued two israeli hostages from a building in rafah, during a military operation that reportedly killed about 100 palestinians.[241] hisham spoke to human rights watch about the impact of the hostage rescue operation on him: they used ground troops and drones, airstrikes, and special forces. the situation was really hard, all the attacks were above our heads: the f16 was hitting, the apache was hitting, bombs from everywhere surrounding us and we were in our tents. it was the most difficult three hours that we experienced since the war started. it was strong and terrifying…so i decided that night that i need to move my family from the area. the next day, i packed all my stuff and my tent and i went back up to the north to al zawayda town, near where i'm from originally, near gaza city.[242] in late may, israeli air strikes hit areas west of rafah, where the military had not ordered civilians to evacuate. israeli ground troops and tanks had been operating in eastern rafah, in central parts of the city, and along the gaza egypt border.[243] according to a report by amnesty international: on may 26 two israeli airstrikes on the kuwaiti peace camp, a makeshift camp for displaced people in tal al sultan in west rafah, killed at least 36 people   including six children   and injured more than 100. the attacks were followed by a fire. at least four of those killed were fighters as the airstrike targeted two hamas commanders staying amid displaced civilians. in a second incident on may 28, the israeli military fired at least three tank shells at a location in the al mawasi area of rafah. the attacks killed 23 civilians   including twelve children, seven women, and four men   and injured many more…the apparent targets of the attack were one hamas and one islamic jihad fighter.[244] the amnesty report concluded that israeli forces failed to take all feasible precautions to spare civilians in may attacks on the kuwaiti peace camp and al mawasi and that both attacks should be investigated as war crimes.[245] at the time of writing, the rafah border crossing with egypt remains closed, since israeli forces seized control of it during military operations on may 6, effectively cauterizing the main route for aid operations and evacuations of those needing immediate and urgent medical attention.[246] on october 2023, hamas interior ministry spokesman eyad al bozom said at a news conference, “we tell the people of northern gaza and from gaza city, stay put in your homes, and your places.”[247] on the same day, the hamas authority for refugee affairs reportedly told residents in northern gaza to “remain steadfast in your homes and to stand firm in the face of this disgusting psychological war waged by the occupation.”[248] the israeli military released audio of a palestinian man claiming that hamas was blocking people from leaving northern gaza, as ongoing israeli strikes targeted the area.[249] human rights watch could not verify the authenticity of the audio recording, nor the circumstances under which the man made the statement. further, israeli media reports suggested that hamas set up roadblocks on gaza’s main routes, effectively hindering civilians from reaching safer areas in the south of gaza.[250] these reports also allege that blocking people from fleeing was part of broader efforts by hamas to use civilians as “human shields.”[251] an israeli military official also indicated that hamas had placed obstacles to prevent evacuations and had tried to attribute an explosive incident on an evacuation route to israel, which israel denied.[252] in its june 10, 2024 report to the un human rights council, the independent international commission of inquiry on the occupied palestinian territory, including east jerusalem, and israel said that it “documented several reports indicating that evacuation processes were also hindered by hamas threats, setting up roadblocks to block evacuations and attacks against those that wanted to leave… the commission therefore concludes on reasonable grounds that hamas has made attempts to discourage and potentially obstruct the evacuation of civilians.”[253] human rights watch asked each of the 39 people it interviewed in private and confidential interviews if hamas or other palestinian armed groups had obstructed them from fleeing and none said that that had happened to them, but it is possible under the circumstances that some interviewees may not have felt comfortable discussing hamas military operations with human rights watch. the massive, ongoing scale of israeli attacks in gaza might indicate that if palestinian armed groups or members of hamas attempted to maintain roadblocks for any length of time, they would likely have been targeted. in this scenario, it may be unlikely that efforts to block palestinians from following evacuation orders would have stopped many people from fleeing for more than brief periods. all parties to conflicts must, take all feasible precautions to protect the civilian population under their control from the effects of attacks, including allowing civilians to leave areas. they must, to the extent feasible, remove civilian persons under their control from the vicinity of military objectives.[254] intentionally using the presence or movement of civilians to attempt to make certain areas or military forces immune from military operations would amount to human shielding.[255] therefore, any efforts by hamas or palestinian armed groups to prevent civilians from fleeing would amount to the war crime of human shielding if carried out to force civilians to remain in proximity to military targets in order to deter attacks on those targets. even if hamas did obstruct some palestinians in gaza from accessing evacuation areas or prevented them from leaving their homes or areas, this would not absolve israel from its obligation not to engage in forced displacement. not a single electricity switch will be flipped on, not a single faucet will be turned on and not a single fuel truck will enter until the israeli hostages are returned home.[256] ― israel katz, then minister of energy, now minister of defense, october 12, 2023 under article 49 of the geneva convention, a lawful evacuation of the protected population should adhere to humanitarian standards: the occupying power undertaking such transfers or evacuations shall ensure, to the greatest practicable extent, that proper accommodation is provided to receive the protected persons, that the removals are effected in satisfactory conditions of hygiene, health, safety and nutrition, and that members of the same family are not separated.[257] israel is responsible for ensuring that the humanitarian needs of displaced people are met. the icrc commentary expands on this section of article 49: it represents a very strong recommendation to the occupying power… if…it is not possible to return the evacuated persons to their homes within a comparatively short period, it will be the duty of the occupying power to provide them with suitable accommodation and make proper feeding and sanitary arrangements.[258] israel has made no meaningful efforts to comply with these protections and has in fact taken steps to, and publicly declared its intention to make unavailable and inaccessible goods and services essential to the human rights of palestinians in gaza through its attacking of civilian infrastructure and restrictions on aid.[259] in response to the october 7 attacks, israeli authorities have cut off rights essential public services, including water and electricity, to gaza’s population   including displaced palestinians   and blocked the entry of all but a trickle of fuel and critical humanitarian aid.[260] acts of collective punishment that amount to war crimes and are ongoing at the time of writing. on october 13, 2023, israel announced that all residents of northern gaza, including gaza city, around 1.1 million people, must evacuate south of wadi gaza. that same day, israel katz, then minister of energy, stated on social media that israel will not provide “an ounce of water and electricity to those who remain.”[261] in fact, hardly an ounce was available to the evacuees who did leave. prior to the current hostilities, 1.2 million of gaza’s 2.2 million people were estimated to be facing acute food insecurity, and over 80 percent were reliant on humanitarian aid.[262] israel maintains overarching control over gaza, including over the movement of people and goods, territorial waters, airspace, the infrastructure upon which gaza relies, as well as the registry of the population.[263] this leaves gaza’s population almost entirely dependent on israel for access to fuel, electricity, medicine, food, the internet, and other goods and services essential for the realization of their human rights. on november 17, 2023, the world food programme (wfp) warned of the “immediate possibility” of starvation, highlighting that supplies of food and water were practically non existent.[264] on december 3, 2023, it reported a “high risk of famine,” indicating that gaza’s food system was on the brink of collapse.[265] on december 6, 2023, it declared that 48 percent of households in northern gaza and 38 percent of displaced people in southern gaza had experienced “severe levels of hunger.”[266] on july 9, 2024, un experts, including the special rapporteur on the right to food, stated that the “recent deaths of more palestinian children due to hunger and malnutrition leaves no doubt that famine has spread across the entire gaza strip.”[267] israel’s military actions, whether targeting military objectives or not, have had a devastating impact on gaza’s agricultural sector and food security. on november 16, 2023, un experts said that the destruction of half of the gaza’s civilian infrastructure “threatens to make the continuation of palestinian life in gaza impossible.”[268] notably, the israeli military’s bombing of gaza’s last operational wheat mill on november 15, 2023 ensured that locally produced flour would be unavailable in gaza for the foreseeable future.[269] on november 28, 2023, the palestine food security sector, led by the wfp and the food and agriculture organization, reported that over a third of agricultural land in the north had been damaged.[270] additionally, the un office for project services (unops) said that the decimation of road networks had made it more difficult for humanitarian organizations to deliver food and aid to those who need it.[271] “bakeries and grain mills have been destroyed, agriculture, water and sanitation facilities,” scott paul, a senior humanitarian policy adviser for oxfam america, told the associated press on november 23, 2023.[272] the sustained bombardment, coupled with fuel and water shortages, alongside the displacement of more than 1.6 million people to southern gaza, has made farming nearly impossible.[273] ocha reported in late november 2023 that livestock in the north were facing starvation due to the shortage of fodder and water, and that crops were increasingly abandoned and damaged due to lack of fuel to pump irrigation water.[274] on november 28, 2023, the palestinian central bureau of statistics said that gaza is suffering from at least a us$1.6 million daily loss in farm production.[275] the integrated food security phase classification (ipc) has warned: about 1.84 million people across the gaza strip are experiencing high levels of acute food insecurity classified in ipc phase 3 (crisis) or above, including nearly 133,000 people facing catastrophic food insecurity (ipc phase 5) and 664,000, in ipc phase 4 (emergency). about 1.95 million people across the gaza strip will likely experience high levels of acute food insecurity, classified in ipc phase 3 or above (crisis or worse) between november 2024 and april 2025, including nearly 345,000 people who will likely experience catastrophic food insecurity (ipc phase 5). ...the risk of famine between november 2024 and april 2025 persists as long as conflict continues, and humanitarian access is restricted.[276] citing warnings about “catastrophic conditions” in gaza, on january 26, 2024, the international court of justice (icj) ordered israel to “take immediate and effective measures to enable the provision of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian aid.”[277] despite this binding order, israel continued to restrict or block aid, and in march 2024 the icj issued a further order, citing that the “catastrophic living conditions of the palestinians in the gaza strip have deteriorated further,” in particular because of “the prolonged and widespread deprivation of food and other basic necessities.”[278] according to ocha and the united nations relief and works agency for palestine refugees in the near east (unrwa), the daily average number of trucks entering gaza with food, aid, and medicine dropped by more than a third in the weeks following the january icj order. on april 10, samantha power, head of the us humanitarian and development agency, usaid, became the first us official to confirm publicly that reports of famine in at least some parts of gaza were “credible.”[279] on april 11, 2024, the washington post spoke with 25 aid groups, un agencies, and donor countries about the kinds of aid they have tried to get into gaza.[280] it found that “in the six months since the start of the war, israeli authorities have denied or restricted access to a number of items, ranging from lifesaving medical supplies to toys to chocolate croissants.”[281] israel justifies the restrictions according to its interpretation of “dual use” items, items that are predominantly civilian in nature but could also be used militarily, such as construction materials, communications equipment and chemicals.[282] israel argues these restrictions are necessary to choke off hamas’s military apparatus.[283] humanitarian agencies have demanded the israeli military publish a list of dual use and prohibited items, to provide written notice of its rejections of aid shipments, and to allow for rejections by soldiers on the ground to be appealed, which israel’s military agency responsible for blocking and arbitrarily rejecting aid, cogat, has so far refused.[284] on may 5, israeli authorities closed the kerem shalom crossing after a hamas rocket attack,[285] and on may 7, israeli forces seized the rafah crossing as part of its incursion in the area, thus blocking aid from entering via the primary crossings that had been used before israel took control of that crossing. on may 24, the icj underlined “the catastrophic humanitarian situation in gaza” and the need for the “unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance.”[286] it ordered israel to “maintain open the rafah crossing for unhindered provision at scale of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance.”[287] prior to october 7, 2023, 500 lorries of humanitarian aid entered gaza per day.[288] in the first month of the war, only nine lorries a day made it in and in the first ten days of october 2024, only 30 lorries made it in.[289] israeli authorities and forces have cut off the water supply piped into gaza from israel, cut off the electricity supply from israel to gaza that was needed to operate water pumps, desalinization plants, and sanitation infrastructure within gaza, and blocked and restricted the fuel needed to run generators in the absence of electricity.[290] they have also blocked un agencies and humanitarian aid organizations from delivering critical water related materials and other humanitarian aid from entering gaza; destroyed water infrastructure, including in direct attacks, and have attacked water repair workers.[291] on december 4, 2023, the un humanitarian coordinator for the occupied palestinian territory, lynn hastings, said that the limited amounts of fuel being allowed in were “utterly insufficient.”[292] on december 6, 2023, israel’s war cabinet approved a “minimal” increase in fuel supplies to southern gaza.[293] on october 7, 2023, israeli authorities cut the electricity it delivers to gaza, the main source of electricity there.[294] israeli authorities also cut fuel necessary to run gaza’s only power plant. by october 11, 2023, the only power plant in gaza ran out of fuel reserves.[295] because of the absence of electricity due to the unavailability of fuel to operate diesel generators, facilities for water and wastewater in gaza became inoperable. while israeli authorities later began allowing in some fuel, they have only allowed in a fraction of what is needed to operate gaza’s critical infrastructure. as of july 2024, the fuel needed to supply gaza’s energy needs remains woefully inadequate.[296] on november 7, 2023, unops reported a “staggering 92 per cent drop in water consumption from pre conflict levels,” finding “the vast majority of sewage stations now inoperative,” and warned of “a water and sanitation crisis of catastrophic proportions.”[297] according to the united nations office for the coordination of humanitarian affairs (ocha), as of february 16, water production in gaza stood at just 5.7 percent of what it was before the current hostilities.[298] in august 2024, a water, sanitation and hygiene (wash) assessment in gaza found that 1.4 million people face a shortage of drinking water and also face unsafe conditions when accessing sanitation facilities.[299] international humanitarian law requires israel, as the occupying power in gaza, to ensure that the basic needs of the civilian population are provided for. this is a positive obligation that requires israel also to protect palestinians’ right to water and to take “deliberate, concrete, and targeted” measures to ensure the full realization of these rights. depriving a population of access to water amounts to collective punishment of the civilian population, a war crime. the right to water, which includes the right to safe and clean drinking water and sanitation, is also a human right, and is derived from the right to life and the right to an adequate standard of living.[300] israel is a party to the international covenant on economic, social and cultural rights (icescr) and remains bound to its terms at all times, including during armed conflicts and public emergencies.[301] as such, israel continues to bear the obligation to respect, protect, and fulfil all economic, social, and cultural rights, including the rights to food, water, housing, and health.[302] in its general comments interpreting the obligations of states parties with respect to these rights, the committee on economic, social and cultural rights (escr) has repeatedly reiterated that states must comply with certain core obligations that represent the minimum essential levels of these rights, non compliance with which cannot be justified even in times of conflict, as they are non derogable. this includes, among other things, several core obligations to the right to health that israel has clearly failed to comply with according to the evidence included below: all those interviewed by human rights watch for this report stressed the dire nature of their humanitarian situation. every interviewee said they were hungry and thirsty and had inadequate or no shelter. they all struggled to access basic goods and public services, and those with health conditions could not access the medication or medical services they required. omar, whose survival of appalling conditions since october 7 is recounted in an earlier section, sought refuge in a camp in khan younis, though it is likely he has had to move since the interview. he described the conditions: where we are now, it is where israel said is safe   in khan younis. we are living in a tent. we don’t have anything. we don’t have food or water, we are living under a plastic tent. this camp is hosting 77,000 people but actually it only has capacity to host 5,000. there are 17,000 to 19,000 kids in the camp; 90 percent of kids are sick. it has been raining and there is no treatment... we don’t know how to treat the sick people. if you wake up [in the night] to go to the toilet you have to wait hours for your turn.[307] youssef, whose wife was heavily pregnant at the time of interview, explained that she had been told by doctors before the outbreak of the hostilities that she would need a cesarean section in order to give birth safely. “i don’t know if labor starts where she should go.…we are not receiving any help. i don’t know what to do when the time comes. it is very heavy on me to even think about it,” he said.[308] youssef went on to explain the conditions of his displacement where he was living at the time of interview in a tent in rafah: i have to walk three kilometers to get one gallon of water. there is no food. if we were able to find food, it is canned food… my mother has high blood pressure and a sugar problem, but her treatment is unavailable. i am constantly searching for things that are needed to survive.[309] human rights watch was not able to follow up with youssef to find out what happened to him and his family. interviewees consistently explained how difficult it was for them to find a place to shelter during their journey. people described overwhelmingly crowded places, usually unrwa or public schools and hospitals that have become informal displacement shelters.[310] sami, a 32 year old single man who is financially responsible for his large, extended family, described how he fled his home in shuja’iyya in mid october and found shelter with his family next to al quds hospital: during our stay in al quds hospital, it was awful. the three buildings were fully packed and so many people were there   maybe 16,000 people. the hospital couldn’t hold or help so many people. there were people getting sick and getting diseases. no one was helping us at that time... it was so hard to find water or even buy it. the water we found was not good for drinking, but we didn’t have any choice.[311] al quds hospital was damaged by israeli airstrikes on october 18.[312] calling it the “death night,” sami suffered what he said were first degree burns during the attacks and eventually fled to an unrwa school on al zeituna street near the south of gaza city that was being used as a shelter: when we reached the school, we found the situation was horrible. it was not a place for humans to stay, there were 20,000 people living there…no one was in charge. we didn’t receive mattresses or covers. we couldn’t stay inside the school. we stayed outside, only one night.[313] all interviewees described the struggle to find food and water to survive   usually a daily routine of walking kilometers to identify people with food or potable water to sell. yusra, a 36 year old woman living with her father, stepmother, and brother who has a mobility disability, fled her home near the fences with israel on october 11 and sought shelter in khan younis, following the israeli military’s instructions that she received on her telephone via text messages.[314] she explained how difficult it was to find a shelter that could house her father who has several health conditions and needs assistance to walk, as well as her brother who uses a wheelchair. she eventually found a metal container to rent: we get water but it is not potable water. it is salty water, but we have to drink it sometimes when we cannot get drinking water. taking a bath is a dream. we can’t heat the water to bathe. we need to find wood for a fire. we burn old clothes to make a fire to cook sometimes. we make bad bread because we don’t have all the ingredients and we cannot afford it... we don’t have enough of anything.[315] nadine, a 29 year old woman, who was living with her husband and four children in nuseirat refugee camp in gaza before the war, explained how she and her family had been displaced three times and was sheltering in deir al balah at the time of interview. she described how since the outset of the hostilities, prices had dramatically increased as goods became increasingly scarce: the situation with food and water is horrific. it makes me feel like i am living many kinds of war. a war from my enemies and a war with my own people. because the food prices went up. before a bunch of parsley was around one shekel [approximately $0.27] and now it is 5 to 10 shekels. it is the same for a bag flour, it is nearly 100 to 150 shekels. it has been a week that i haven’t had flour... it is so hard to get water to drink. it is almost impossible to find. my kids have had diarrhea, the flu, and runny noses. all of this because of the [bad] water ... medication is non existent. we have no rights anymore. the people who live in gaza are no longer humans. we survive less than the animals in your country    they at least have water and food … this morning, i gave my daughters some bread and a bit of cheese. i don’t have food to give them, so i sent them back to sleep. i feel ashamed.[316] saeed, a 53 year old director of an organization focused on programming for children with diabetes in gaza, explained how difficult it was to access insulin in gaza and worried for the one week’s supply he had left for his son who has type 1 diabetes. displaced originally from al shati camp in northern gaza, saeed fled specifically to rafah to try and find insulin and better access to other rights essential goods, including menstrual hygiene products, and services for his five children than in other areas such as deir al balah where he had sought refuge previously: the price of food and water these days   you can multiply it by 30 or 40 times since before the war. we buy all our water. there are more than one million people now in rafah. the traffic is terrible, moving around is tiring…i moved here to get insulin. i have two rounds of medication left…but there is no solution…i don’t know what will happen. it is a huge problem that i will be facing soon. our kids are not just dying from bombs   but from eating the food and the water, and when they need medication. my son is one of triplets, the other two are girls. i cannot find feminine hygiene products for my girls at all. in rafah where i am now, we cannot find any; i got tired just looking. maybe there is in other places in gaza, but here in rafah there is nothing. i tried to get pampers [baby diapers] for my girls for their periods but there are none.[317] tarek, a 53 year old man with 11 children also fled his home in al shati refugee camp in the early days of the war and sought refuge with his son who was receiving treatment for leukemia in al rantisi specialist hospital in gaza. he said the hospital was eventually damaged in an israeli airstrike and he fled with his family to rafah: i don’t think there is worse than the conditions we are living in now, as much as i will try to explain in words it’s completely different living it. i’ve been sick since the day i arrived to rafah   that means 30 or 40 days ago, i also have diabetes that i’m not monitoring or even taking medication for, my wife also has diabetes…my 7 year old son has leukemia, his immunity is weak and no one has anything here to help with his condition, i don’t even have a way to contact his physician. i also have kids who have other conditions like eye sight problems, and one has injuries in both legs. i just sent my son out with five shekels (approximately us$1.30) because we are out of water. that amount will get us five liters and we are fifteen people so by tonight we will run out of water again and if we can’t find drinkable water we will drink the sea water. it happened to me many times when i had to drink sea water. you don’t understand how much we are suffering. regarding sanitary pads for my girls: we can’t find any at the markets and even if we were able to find some, we can’t even afford to buy them anymore because they are so expensive; one pack may cost between 25 to 30 shekels (approximately us$6 $8) now, so they are using diapers.[318] the israeli authorities have continued to force the mass displacement of people to areas where their human rights are violated. israeli military did not prepare any infrastructure to provide goods and services essential for their human rights, prevented humanitarian actors from carrying out activities adequate to do so, and have actively and intentionally taken steps to make unavailable and inaccessible what few rights essential resources displaced people could access through the widespread destruction of local food production capacity, water, electricity, fuel throughout gaza. while the obligation in article 49 of the geneva convention is for the occupying power to provide safeguards “to the greatest practicable extent” for the evacuated population, the icrc commentary notes that if it “is not possible to return the evacuated persons to their homes within a comparatively short period, it will be the duty of the occupying power to provide them with suitable accommodation and make proper feeding and sanitary arrangements.”[319] it is now a over a year since the conflict began and more than 1.8 million palestinians in gaza are experiencing “extremely critical” levels of hunger.[320] the only way into besieged and occupied gaza, surrounded by israel to the north and east and egypt to the south, is through israeli controlled borders. in november 2023, israel’s minister of agriculture and food security, avi dichter, said that “we are now rolling out the gaza nakba.” in pursuit of this goal, the israeli military bombed civilian infrastructure and residences, and took steps that ensured a catastrophic humanitarian crisis in which displaced people are unable to access food, water, sanitation or health care, and where children are dying of starvation and preventable diseases. before the war, about 500 trucks entered gaza daily, carrying commercial goods and humanitarian aid, and the number has since drastically plummeted. in august 2024, only 1,559 trucks entered gaza through the kerem shalom and rafah border crossings even when a famine alert was declared in parts of gaza this summer.[321] between september 1 and 15, 2024, of the 94 planned humanitarian missions coordinated with the israeli authorities for northern gaza only 37 (or 39 percent) went ahead. a total of 25 (or 27 percent) were denied access.[322] these policies and practices are evidence of the war crimes and crime against humanity of forced displacement, and evidence of israel’s violation of displaced persons human rights, including the rights to food, health, water, and sanitation. israel has at best failed to adhere to the strict obligations of article 49 of the geneva convention to evacuate people to areas where their humanitarian needs can be met, and at worst driven them to places where they are intentionally being starved and put in harm’s way. after five months of devastating war and destruction, the actions of the israeli government in gaza give the impression that its objectives go beyond destroying hamas. as major general giora eiland wrote last december in yedioth ahronoth there appears to be an effort to “turn gaza into a place that is temporarily or permanently impossible to live in.” and indeed, almost everything that allows a human society to function has been destroyed: civil register, property register, cultural and health infrastructure, most of the schools built by unrwa.[323] ― josep borrell, high representative of the european union for foreign affairs and security policy / vice president of the european commission, march 5, 2024 international humanitarian law (ihl) prohibits the forced displacement of civilians except temporarily, when required for their security or imperative military reasons.[324] people must be allowed to return once hostilities have ended. in the interim, the israeli military should not be taking actions that render return impossible. this includes actions which have made gaza uninhabitable for years to come through the widespread destruction and levelling of large parts of gaza, particularly at times when israeli forces are in control of an area, and active fighting has ceased. analysis of satellite imagery shows that the damage caused by the israeli military often appears to follow a pattern that includes aerial bombardment of areas, followed by the intervention of ground forces, and in certain instances, once a relative level of control has been achieved, the deliberate bulldozing and razing of territory and the use of controlled demolitions. some of this destruction appears to clearly go beyond what is militarily necessary and demonstrates an intention to systematically destroy parts of gaza, frustrating the right to return. on august 1, 2024, the un said “the recent conflict in the gaza strip has produced a volume of debris that is 14 times greater than the combined total from all conflicts over the past 16 years.”[325] the united nations mine action service (unmas) estimated the amount of debris in gaza at 37 million tons in mid april, or 300 kilograms per square meter stating that there was more rubble than in ukraine, and that the rubble is likely heavily contaminated with unexploded ordnance.[326] on may 2, 2024, the united nations development program (undp) estimated that it would take between us$40 and $50 billion to rebuild gaza and require an effort on a scale the world has not seen since world war ii.[327] on february 8, 2024, un high commissioner for human rights volker türk said that his office had recorded “widespread destruction and demolition by the israeli military of civilian and other infrastructure, including residential buildings, schools and universities in areas in which fighting is not or no longer taking place.”[328] türk’s observations covered the period since late october 2023, but he noted reports of destroyed residential buildings and blocks taking place in khan younis at the time of his statement. reminding israeli authorities “that forcible transfer of civilians may constitute a war crime,”[329] he said that the “destruction of homes and other essential civilian infrastructures…appears to be aimed at or has the effect of rendering the return of civilians to these areas impossible.”[330] according to the world bank, by january 21, 2024, and compared to figures before the conflict, 83.6 percent of all health infrastructure in gaza was damaged or destroyed; 83.4 percent of education facilities; 75.8 percent of information and communications technology; 61.6 percent of housing; and 62 percent of electricity lines.[331] on january 5, martin griffiths, the under secretary general for humanitarian affairs and emergency relief coordinator, stated “gaza has simply become uninhabitable.”[332] as of july 2024, the world health organization (who) had registered more than 1,000 attacks on healthcare facilities in the occupied palestinian territory (opt) since the october 7 and declared that there were no functional hospitals in the enclave’s southernmost city of rafah, following israel’s recent offensive there.[333] unosat reported on september 27 based on images from september 3 and 6 that approximately 130,000 buildings had been damaged or destroyed.[334] this amounts to around 52 percent of the total structures in gaza and 178,132 estimated damaged housing units. the most affected governorates are gaza, khan younis, with approximately 35,000 damaged or destroyed buildings. in a briefing to the un security council on february 22, christopher lockyear, the secretary general of médecins sans frontières (msf) stated that “there is no health system to speak of left in gaza. israel’s military has dismantled hospital after hospital.”[335] as of may 8, only 12 out of 36 hospitals are partially functioning across gaza, according to the who.[336] as of july 15, nearly 90,000 people had been wounded in hostilities since october 7, but there were only 1,532 inpatient hospital beds in gaza.[337] people’s homes have not been spared, as residential areas in gaza have faced exceptional levels of destruction, with relentless airstrikes and shelling turning vast swathes of neighborhoods turned into rubble. according to a report by undp, as of april 15, 2024, approximately 370,000 housing units in gaza have been damaged, 79,000 of which were completely destroyed.[338] the destruction of residential homes in gaza equates to roughly 70 percent of total housing stock.[339] on january 30, 2024, an investigation by the guardian detailed the mass destruction of buildings and land in three neighborhoods in gaza: beit hanoun, al zahra, and khan younis.[340] using satellite imagery and open source information, the investigation found damage to more than 250 residential buildings, 17 schools and universities, 16 mosques, three hospitals, three cemeteries, and 150 agricultural greenhouses. entire buildings were leveled, fields flattened, and places of worship wiped off the map.[341] the investigation covered the complete destruction of the al zahra tower block complex on october 19, 2023 by israeli airstrikes. the complex was reportedly home to 3,000 people. the bbc investigated the incident and described how one man received a telephone call from the israeli authorities warning him to evacuate the complex immediately “because they will bomb the towers.”[342] he was also instructed to tell other people to evacuate the buildings. human rights watch spoke to a family who had been living in one of the al zahra towers at the time of the attacks. lina, a 49 year old woman, was living with her parents and siblings in al jalaa street near the rimal area of north gaza when the war broke out. she said that in the early days of the war there were airstrikes in her area and her house was damaged when a building 400 to 500 meters away was hit.[343] she said she did not receive any warning from the israeli military, but her family fled to tower 27 of the al zahra complex to stay with her sister’s family.[344] she had been there for five days before the israelis attacked the towers: at 8 p.m. we started hearing people screaming: some people were saying, “you have to leave in 20 minutes.” my father is old and cannot move fast. the first thing we needed to do was make sure my mum and dad were safe. thank god my sister lives on the first floor of the tower. we left with nothing. i took my laptop only because my wallet was in my laptop. i didn’t take anything else. thirty minutes earlier, someone had received a call from the israelis saying to leave because they would target the area. at around midnight of that night, we witnessed horrifying things. around 12 hours of attacks. the area was hit for 12 hours. most of the buildings were completely destroyed. as much as i try to explain the horror, i cannot find the words. the whole area was red in the night because of the heaviness of the targeting and even though there was no electricity we could see everything.[345] today the towers have been reduced to dust and rubble and lie amid an area that appears to have experienced near total destruction, within the netzarim corridor, without any reconstruction. the israeli military told the bbc it was “unable to answer specific operative questions” when asked about its decision to strike al zahra’s residential blocks.[346] in late january 2024, the israeli newspaper haaretz published information about a new practice whereby members of the israeli military set fire to housing units in gaza following direct orders from their commanders after they established control over the area and without the necessary legal authority: recently, israeli soldiers deployed in gaza have taken to social media to show themselves taking part in the burning of homes in gaza   in some cases as revenge for fellow soldiers’ deaths, or even for the october 7 attack itself. “every day, a different platoon goes out to raid homes in the area,” wrote one soldier. “the houses are destroyed, occupied. now what is left is to thoroughly search them. inside the couches. behind the closets. weapons, intel, [tunnel] shafts and rocket launchers. we found all of these. in the end, the house is burned, with everything in it.”[347] on february 7, 2024, the gaza government media office in gaza said that israeli forces had torched 3,000 residences.[348] on march 22, 2024, euro med human rights monitor published a report on the israeli military’s targeting and evacuation of homes next to the al shifa medical complex area, and documented the burning of buildings once the israeli authorities cleared people’s homes.[349] asked about the reports, the israeli military said there were no specific procedures for evacuations, only that it “depends on the situation” and if there is an “operational threat.”[350] the israeli military did not respond to questions about burning homes, instead saying its troops carry out “demolitions of hamas infrastructure and other military targets using approved and appropriate means.”[351] israeli forces have destroyed bakeries, agricultural products, and once arable land, including by razing orchards, fields, and greenhouses. the destruction of agricultural lands not only exacerbates current food shortages, but will have devastating, perhaps irreversible, long term consequences for food production and livelihoods in gaza. in june 2024, the united nations environment programme (unep) found that “environmental impacts of the war in gaza are unprecedented…exposing the community to rapidly growing soil, water and air pollution and risks of irreversible damage to its natural ecosystems.”[352] satellite imagery captured on different dates from november 2023 to august 2024 that human rights watch reviewed shows that orchards, fields, and greenhouses have been systematically razed. high resolution satellite imagery confirms that bulldozers were used to destroy fields and orchards. the un food and agriculture organization stated that 42.6 percent of all croplands and 26.6 percent of all greenhouses in gaza had been damaged as of february 15, 2024.[353] on august 29, unosat fao released its agricultural damage assessment in gaza, finding that “compared to the average of the previous seven seasons years, approximately 68 percent of the permanent crop fields and arable land in gaza exhibited a significant decline in health and density in august 2024.”[354] it also found that there has been a five percent increase in the proportion of agricultural land that has been damaged since the previous analysis conducted in july 2024. whether by deliberate razing, damage due to hostilities or the inability to irrigate or work the land, farmland across gaza has been drastically reduced since the beginning of the israeli ground operations. because cultural heritage makes individuals part of a community, damaging it has psychosocial effects that can interfere with post conflict recovery.[355] cultural heritage is passed from one generation to another, and its destruction breaks the generational chain. the widespread destruction, whether as part of hostilities or not, in gaza includes most of its cultural heritage sites. on december 8, 2023, an israeli airstrike largely destroyed gaza’s oldest mosque, the omari mosque.[356] the omari mosque was originally a fifth century byzantine church and was an iconic landmark of gaza: over 4,000 square meters of history, architecture, and cultural heritage.[357] on october 20, 2023, an israeli airstrike damaged the orthodox church of st. porphyrius, the oldest active church in gaza. at least 500 palestinians were sheltering in the church when it was hit and at least eighteen people were killed.[358] on october 17, 2024, unesco and unosat released a preliminary satellite imagery based damage assessment of cultural properties. between october 7, 2023 and september 17, 2024, 69 sites have been damaged, comprising of 10 religious sites, 43 buildings of historical or artistic interest, two depositories of movable cultural property, six monuments, one museum, and seven archeological sites.[359] gaza’s ministry of endowments and religious affairs announced in january that 1,000 of 1,200 mosques in gaza had been damaged or destroyed.[360] a bbc investigation also verified damage and destruction to 74 religious sites between october 7, 2023 and december 31, 2023, including the omari mosque, dating back to the 14th century, as well as the church of saint porphyrius.[361] un experts decried the destruction of 195 heritage sites, 227 mosques and three churches have also been damaged or destroyed, including the central archives of gaza, which preserved 150 years of history.[362] human rights watch does not assess here if individual attacks on religious and cultural buildings were unlawful under ihl, but the total level of destruction makes it much more difficult for people to return to live in their homes. israel has destroyed gaza’s education buildings and infrastructure, leading to permanent education loss for palestinian children and adults in gaza. in july 2024, the occupied palestinian territory education cluster, in collaboration with unosat, reported that nearly 93 percent of schools have been affected through strikes. since october 7, 2023, at least 65 schools were completely destroyed, while 344 schools   representing 61 percent of total school buildings in gaza   were directly hit.[363] widespread damage includes 156 out of the 187 unrwa school buildings in gaza, which have been either directly hit or damaged through strikes.[364] in north gaza governorate, the education cluster classified 98 percent of school buildings in this governorate as having been either directly hit or damaged, which includes severe damage to school infrastructure according to the cluster and unosat’s classification.[365] the education cluster’s assessment also found that at least 85 percent of schools in gaza will either need “full reconstruction” or “major rehabilitation work” to be functional again.[366] according to the scholars at risk network, israeli forces have also significantly damaged, demolished or destroyed all of gaza’s universities, including the islamic university of gaza;[367] al aqsa university,[368] which was functioning as a shelter at the time of the attack; al israa university, reportedly used by israeli forces as a military base and a detention and interrogation center, according to scholars at risk;[369] university college of science and technology, palestine;[370] al azhar university;[371] and the gaza branch of al quds open university.[372] on april 18, 2024, un experts expressed grave concern over the education loss of over 625,000 children, the pattern of attacks on schools and universities, and the killing of students, teachers and university professors in gaza, as well as the destruction of its public libraries. raising serious alarm over the systemic destruction of the palestinian education system, they highlighted: the persistent, callous attacks on educational infrastructure in gaza have a devastating long term impact on the fundamental rights of people to learn and freely express themselves, depriving yet another generation of palestinians of their future.[373] the experts added, “these attacks are not isolated incidents. they present a systematic pattern of violence aimed at dismantling the very foundation of palestinian society.”[374] again, while human rights watch cannot assess the intentionality of the destruction of educational infrastructure, what is clear is that palestinian children and students in gaza will not be able to return immediately, nor potentially in the foreseeable future, to full time education. on february 1, 2024, the new york times reported that “at least 33 controlled demolitions have destroyed hundreds of buildings   including mosques, schools and entire sections of residential neighborhoods   since november,” analyzing israeli military footage, videos posted on social media, and satellite imagery.[375] while the investigation quoted israeli officials who spoke anonymously about wanting to demolish palestinian buildings close to the border as part of an effort to create a “buffer zone,” the newspaper found that most of the demolitions occurred well outside that zone and indicated that the “number of confirmed demolitions may represent only a portion of the actual number carried out by israel since the war began.”[376] on april 29, 2024, an investigative reporting organization, bellingcat, published an interactive report and film entitled, “‘we’ve become addicted to explosions’: the idf [israeli military] unit responsible for demolishing homes across gaza,” which followed the movements of a particular israeli military unit and mapped their demolitions in gaza.[377] the report’s methodology “…used social media to track a single idf [israeli military] combat engineering battalion, 8219 commando, as they moved across gaza, demolishing tunnels, houses, and mosques.”[378] bellingcat quoted the captain of the unit saying they had destroyed “thousands” of buildings, noting in a post on january 13, 2024 that his commanding officer told him there is “no precedent” for this in the israeli military and that they had stopped counting the buildings they had destroyed.[379] “sometimes soldiers did not give an explanation about why they carried out demolitions,” the web feature reported.[380] “other times they listed a number of objectives or reasons for the demolitions. one of these appears to be seeking revenge.”[381] ihl prohibits the destruction of civilian objects and of property seized from the adversary in the absence of military necessity.[382] wanton destruction of such property constitutes a war crime.[383] on april 11, 2024, unosat published satellite imagery analysis from february 29 showing that 90 percent of the buildings located within one kilometer of the border fence separating gaza from israel had been damaged or destroyed.[384] a second unosat analysis published the same day of satellite imagery from february 21 showed that 33 percent of the agricultural land in that area had been damaged.[385] israeli officials have claimed that a buffer zone is necessary to allow residents of communities in the south of israel to return to their homes without fear of another attack. “[all along] the gaza strip…we will have a margin. and they will not be able to get in,” avi dichter, israel’s minister of agriculture and food security, told reporters on october 19, 2023.[386] “it will be a fire zone. and no matter who you are, you will never be able to come close to the israeli border.”[387] the plan reportedly involves establishing a security belt along gaza's borders by demolishing residential blocks, bulldozing farms, and destroying civilian infrastructure.[388] asked about the clearance of areas along the border in january 2024, israel’s military said in a statement that it was removing “terror infrastructure,” calling the work “imperative…in order to implement a defense plan that will provide improved security in southern israel.”[389] a map published on january 18 on the x account of the then minister for social equality, amichai chikli, depicts a buffer zone wider than one kilometer in some parts that will include “a new line of military outposts, along the entire length of the border of the strip.”[390] human rights watch analyzed satellite imagery from february and early march 2024 showing a new road constructed by the israeli military that bisects the northern and southern halves of gaza and runs east to west. in interviews with the bbc, the israeli military said the road was constructed to gain an “operational foothold,” and “facilitate the movement of troops and equipment.”[391] two apparent new checkpoints have been set up on the road: one on the side nearest the coast, and one at the crossing with the salah al din road with systems which will identify and regulate who and what is allowed to cross.[392] in a report in haaretz, the israeli newspaper, the israeli military denied that the structures are checkpoints, calling them “outposts,” and claimed they were temporary.[393] on satellite imagery from august 25, 2024, systematic destruction can be seen on both sides of the new road, all the way south until wadi gaza and north roughly until the 10th street. the netzarim corridor is more than four kilometers wide, and at the time of the publication, keeps expanding towards northern gaza. similar destruction can be seen along the border between gaza and egypt in the so called philadelphi corridor. starting in early may 2024, with the ground incursion in rafah, the israeli military progressively razed and destroyed buildings all along this border once they took control of the area. satellite imagery from august 23 shows that the majority of buildings located in the first few hundred meters from the border have been razed. in addition to the creation of buffer zones around both corridors and along the border with israel, the israeli military has also systematically razed land and buildings along the other roads they have built to enter gaza. this can be seen, for instance, along the access road to khan younis or jabaliya refugee camp. in september 2024, a report from amnesty international found that the “expanded buffer zone” along the perimeter with israel covers approximately 58 square kilometers, which amounts to roughly 16 percent of the entirety of occupied gaza.[394] as of may 2024, more than 90 percent of the buildings within this area (more than 3,500 structures) appear destroyed or severely damaged; and more than 20 square kilometers or 59 percent of agricultural land within the area shows a decline in health and density of crops due to the ongoing conflict.”[395] amnesty went on to conclude that in its creation of an extended buffer zone, “the israeli military deliberately razed the land after they had taken control of the area” and in some areas, “structures were deliberately and systematically demolished [by the israeli military]… because of their proximity to the fence built by israel to separate it from the gaza strip.”[396] the creation of security or buffer zones, which permanently change the land on which they are constructed, involves the razing and destruction of the vast majority of homes, roads, fields, orchards, wooded areas, and other civilian infrastructure. this inevitably leads to permanent and forced displacement of those people who live or lived in the area. it is one of the clearest examples of forcible transfer in gaza. a fundamental principle of lawful evacuation is the guaranteed right of individuals to return once hostilities in the area have concluded. the extensive and often permanent damage across gaza is a deliberate attempt by the israeli authorities to create conditions that will make returning not just difficult, but impossible for many palestinians. the long term implications of this destruction are profound. even if the israeli authorities permitted, or were no longer able to block rebuilding, the process will be immense, requiring substantial international financial and technical support and years, if not decades, of effort. as of september 2024, it is estimated that there are 42 million tons of rubble to clear, in an area that is 87 percent urbanized.[397] the physical damage also carries deep psychological scars for the inhabitants, who have lost not just their homes, their access to education, and their religious and cultural institutions, but also their sense of security and community. the physical landscape of gaza has been profoundly altered, with once bustling residential areas now serving as stark reminders of the conflict's toll on human life and habitation. the widespread and intentional destruction of agricultural lands throughout gaza demonstrates how the israeli authorities intend to permanently alter conditions for life and ensure that people cannot return. obviously gaza tomorrow will not look anything like it did before october 7... how it looks territorially...we don’t have the details, but that is our objective: there won’t be any terrorists on our border like there were before.[398] ― avi dichter, israel’s minister of agriculture and food security, october 2023 to qualify as a war crime, the act of forcible transfer must be carried out intentionally, meaning that the perpetrator must have the intent to displace individuals without their genuine consent, by means of force or coercion, from the area in which they are lawfully present.[399] the forcible transfer does not necessarily require physical force; it includes threats, coercion, or other forms of duress that leave the victims with no real choice but to leave.[400] the element of intent here involves the deliberate creation of circumstances that compel the victims to move, understanding that such movement infringes their right to live in their homes and communities free from unlawful interference.[401] the mens rea does not require the intent to transfer permanently.[402] israel’s evacuation orders reveal a clear intent to displace palestinians in gaza and, combined with the intense bombardments prior to and following its first mass evacuation order issued on october 13, 2023, no one could be said to be leaving without coercion. israel has sought to justify its displacement of palestinians as lawful evacuations on both the grounds of military imperative and safety of civilians. on january 10, 2024, prime minister netanyahu said, “israel has no intention of permanently occupying gaza or displacing its civilian population.”[403] he added that “israel is fighting hamas terrorists, not the palestinian population, and we are doing so in full compliance with international law.”[404] israel has not, however, secured the safety of displaced palestinians in gaza in any meaningful way. it has instead created an evacuation system that has caused widespread terror and confusion, misery, and anxiety. senior israeli officials have explicitly stated an intention to prevent civilians from meeting their humanitarian needs. israeli officials have made return to large areas of gaza effectively impossible for the foreseeable future through both widespread, systematic destruction of homes, agricultural land and other buildings and property essential for life. israeli officials have also appeared to create at least three buffer zones with the apparent intention of making these permanent. this is demonstrated by public statements of officials in the chain of command of those involved in military operations. the following statements by senior israeli officials, who could be expected to play a significant role in determining policy with respect to the forcible transfer of the population, demonstrate the intent to forcibly displace people without safeguards, deny humanitarian aid and services, and to collectively punish them: prime minister netanyahu has at times indicated an intention not to forcibly displace palestinians in gaza and promised not to resettle gaza.[427] these statements have been infrequent and overwhelmed by the more frequent statements from ministers in government to do the opposite, and the actions of the israeli military which demonstrate an intent to transfer the civilian population. as this report has demonstrated clearly throughout, israel has matched these statements with action. while some of the israeli government’s actions in gaza since the devastating attacks of october 7 might plausibly be presented as having military justification aligned with israel’s stated objectives of destroying hamas and freeing hostages, when considered together and in combination with the circumstances and implementation of israel’s evacuation orders, the denial of basic necessities to the displaced, such as food, water, and safe spaces, the near total decimation of gaza making it nearly impossible for many palestinians to return to their homes, it is impossible to escape the conclusion that israel intended to displace palestinians in gaza without their consent, i.e. coercively. israel’s evacuation orders have not made the people of gaza safer; on the contrary, they have been used to forcibly transfer and confine the civilian population in unlivable conditions.[428]   paula gaviria betancur, un special rapporteur on the human rights of internally displaced persons parties to an international conflict are prohibited under international law from forcibly transferring or deporting the civilian population of an occupied territory, in whole or in part. violation of this prohibition when committed with criminal intent is prosecutable as a war crime. if committed as part of an “attack against a civilian population,” pursuant to a state policy to commit the crime, it can amount to a crime against humanity. the laws of war applicable to the international armed conflict in israel/palestine include the geneva conventions of 1949, the first additional protocol to the geneva conventions (protocol i), and customary international law.[429] furthermore, international criminal law, notably the rome statute of the international criminal court (icc), which prohibits forced displacement as a war crime and crime against humanity, applies within gaza. provisions in the fourth geneva convention and protocol i, prohibiting individual or mass forcible transfers of civilians from occupied territory to the territory of the occupying power or any other country, make clear that the prohibition is regardless of motive.[430] to constitute the crime of transfer, the transfer needs to be “forcible.” consent to be moved has to be voluntary and genuine, and not given under coercive conditions. as the international criminal tribunal for the former yugoslavia (icty) has made clear, the absence of genuine choice making displacement unlawful and forcible can include psychological force caused by “fear of violence, duress, detention, psychological oppression or abuse of power or by taking advantage of a coercive environment.”[431] therefore, a transfer is not voluntary if civilians agree or seek to be transferred as the only means to escape risk of abuse if they remain. moreover, transferring or displacing civilians is not justified or lawful as being on humanitarian grounds if the humanitarian crisis triggering the displacement is itself the result of unlawful activity by those in charge of the transfers.[432] it is permitted to temporarily displace or evacuate civilians to protect them from the effects of an attack, or if civilian security or imperative military reasons demand such displacement.[433] states’ interpretation of forcible transfer indicates that the war crime of forced displacement can be committed without a direct order to do so.[434] imperative military reason: the burden of proof is on the occupying power to establish that overriding military reasons made the evacuation imperative. the commentary to the additional protocols illustrates that the adjective imperative “reduces to a minimum cases in which displacement may be ordered.”[435] the term imperative sets a very high threshold higher than an ordinary assessment of military necessity. displacement can only be justified if it is a measure of last resort for imperative military operations where there are no feasible alternatives.[436] it does not suffice for civilians to be at risk from an active or reasonably expected threat from an act that would deprive the enemy of a military advantage or secure such an advantage for the occupier. while it is impossible for human rights watch to fully interrogate the military strategy of the israeli military, israel cannot simply rely on the presence of a legitimate military target in gaza, namely hamas, to justify forcible displacing civilians when it attacked hamas. it would need to establish that it had no other option but to evacuate the civilian population in order to achieve its necessary military objective or protect the population itself. however, even where there is a military imperative that puts civilians at risk, what would otherwise be forcible transfer, will only be permitted as a lawful evacuation if israel as the occupying power takes sufficient steps to safeguard civilians during their displacement and return them to their homes as soon as it is safe to do so. article 49 specifies that the occupying power: while the extent and application of these exceptions is subject to a degree of uncertainty as their application depends on the facts of each case, certain principles have been clearly established by courts and tribunals. these include that the displacement occurs in a manner consistent with returning the population after hostilities have ended and consistent with the protection of the civilians’ human rights.[438] in addition, where displacement is conducted in an “atmosphere of terror,” this may negate any claim that it was an evacuation for imperative military reasons.[439] israel has not met these requirements and cannot plausibly claim that the forcible transfer of palestinians in gaza falls within the exemptions that allows lawful evacuation. israel issued evacuation orders that were unclear, inconsistent, and contradictory and impossible to comply with in the allotted time. it attacked areas not subject to evacuation orders, areas designated as safe and evacuation routes. the combination of these acts, the timescale for which was entirely in israel’s control, resulted in the deaths of many palestinians and incited terror in those that were not killed. israel did not make any meaningful efforts to ensure that the humanitarian needs of displaced people were met. instead, israel has taken steps to ensure that displaced civilians cannot avail themselves of such protections through its attacking of civilian infrastructure and restrictions on water, electricity, and aid leading to starvation and threatening famine.[440] the widespread destruction of residential properties, civilian infrastructure, and cultural heritage is also inconsistent with israel’s obligation to ensure that displaced civilians can return to their homes. the most serious breach of this obligation is israel’s acts of destruction in areas where it has troops on the ground and fighting is not or is no longer taking place and in areas where it appears to be creating permanent “buffer zones.” while the destruction levied by israel already means it cannot assert that it has conducted a lawful evacuation, its actions after hostilities have ceased in various areas of gaza as well as after a potential ceasefire throughout the territory, are also relevant to assess the full extent of its responsibility for forced displacement. notably, courts have stated that: the fact that no step is taken by the perpetrator to secure the return of those displaced, when the circumstances that necessitated the evacuation have ceased, is among the factors that may prove an intent to permanently displace the victims rather than the intent to secure the population through a lawful and therefore temporary evacuation.[441] in the naletilić & martinović case at the icty, the tribunal considered whether the defendants had committed the war crime of forcible transfer. in its judgment the trial chamber noted that: when a genuine evacuation takes place, there is an obligation to bring the population back when the hostilities have ended. no attempts to return [the protected population] were made. in fact most of their houses were torched after 18 april 1993.[442] israel has sometimes stated, notably before the international court of justice, that the evacuation system was designed to safeguard civilians. however, israel’s failure to safeguard civilians or to preserve their ability to return demonstrates the opposite intent. such intent has been publicly articulated by government officials who have specifically stated that maximum damage was the purpose of strikes,[443] that palestinians in gaza would be cut off from humanitarian necessities, and that “voluntary emigration” was “the right humanitarian solution for the residents of gaza.”[444] palestinians in gaza were fleeing as a direct result of the overwhelming forced used by the israeli military, the blockade which led to chronic food and water shortages, and numerous civilian casualties, leaving them with no genuine choice but to leave the territory. crimes against humanity are part of customary international law and were first codified in the charter of the nuremberg international military tribunal of 1945. the purpose was to prohibit crimes that “either by their magnitude and savagery, by their large number, or by the fact that a similar pattern was applied…endangered the international community or shocked the conscience of mankind.”[445] since then, the concept has been incorporated into a number of international treaties and the statutes of international criminal tribunals, including the rome statute of the icc. the rome statute is directly applicable for war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in gaza since june 2014, due to the state of palestine’s ratification of the treaty.[446] its jurisdiction includes all persons alleged to be responsible for such crimes in gaza, including israeli nationals. the definition of crimes against humanity varies slightly by treaty, but the definition found in the rome statute, which largely reflects customary international law, includes a range of serious human rights abuses committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack.[447] such an “attack” is defined as a course of conduct involving the multiple commission of such criminal acts pursuant to a state or organizational policy to commit the crimes.[448] the 1998 rome statute of the icc, which came into force in 2002, sets out 15 crimes that can amount to a crime against humanity. deportation or forcible transfer of population are listed as distinct crimes against humanity, defined as the “forced displacement of the persons concerned by expulsion or other coercive acts from the area in which they are lawfully present, without grounds permitted under international law.”[449] the icc pre trial chamber, in a 2018 ruling concerning ethnic rohingya in myanmar, held that deportation and forcible transfer are two distinct crimes against humanity, the difference being that: [t]he displacement of persons lawfully residing in an area to another state amounts to deportation, whereas such displacement to a location within the borders of a state must be characterised as forcible transfer.[450] the state of palestine acceded to the rome statute in 2015.[451] it filed a declaration that gives the icc jurisdiction over crimes in the rome statute, since june 13, 2014 including the crime against humanity of forcible transfer that is alleged to have been committed in the occupied palestinian territory (opt).[452] the attack against a civilian population underlying the commission of crimes against humanity must be widespread or systematic; it need not be both. “widespread” refers to the scale of the acts or number of victims.[453] the attack must be pursuant to or in furtherance of state or organizational policy to commit such an “attack.” such a policy includes the state or organization actively promoting or encouraging such an attack, or in certain situations, its deliberate failure to take action.[454] the israeli military has issued at least 184 evacuation orders which have forced 1.9 million palestinians in gaza to flee their homes.[455] the initial broad based order of october 13, 2023 alone forced over one million people from their homes and as of july 2024, the united nations office for the coordination of humanitarian affairs (ocha) reported that the majority of the population in gaza remains internally displaced.[456] the commission of crimes against humanity can serve as the basis for individual criminal liability not only in the domestic courts of the country where the crimes take place, but also in international courts and tribunals, as well as in other countries’ courts under the principle of universal jurisdiction. individual criminal liability extends beyond those who carry out the acts to those who order, assist, facilitate, aid, and abet the offense. under the principle of command or superior responsibility, military and civilian officials up to the top of the chain of command can be held criminally responsible for crimes committed by their subordinates. responsibility attaches higher up the chain of command when superiors knew or should have known that their subordinates were committing such crimes but failed to take reasonable measures to prevent the crimes or punish those responsible. human rights watch has determined that the israeli authorities have committed multiple acts of forced displacement. these were in furtherance of an organizational policy to commit the criminal act of forcible transfer, and therefore amount to an “attack directed against a civilian population” and a crime against humanity. senior officials in the israeli government and the war cabinet have repeatedly declared their intent to forcibly displace the population, declaring their policy goal throughout the conflict, from the early days of the war to over a year later. while prime minister netanyahu might have stated the opposite intention at various times, the actions of the israeli authorities throughout the conflict, as evidenced in this report, together with statements of intent by other senior members of government demonstrate the underlying state level policy to forcibly transfer the majority of the population in gaza. the israeli military has consistently issued instructions to civilians to evacuate to unsafe areas and put people in harm’s way; instead of providing for the protected population, the israeli authorities have deliberately restricted humanitarian assistance and used starvation as a weapon of war; and the israeli military’s continuous bombardment of gaza has brought about widespread destruction in gaza, either caused recklessly as a result of the hostilities or through deliberate razing of land after the military took control of the area. any specific prosecution of crimes against humanity would need to meet a criminal law standard for individual criminal culpability. while agents of the israeli government in their official capacity as members of the israeli military allegedly committed these crimes, israel’s documented record of failing to hold to account perpetrators of serious human rights abuses against palestinians, including forcible transfer in the occupied west bank, highlights the importance of criminal investigations in international courts and courts in other countries exercising universal jurisdiction.[457] forcible transfer as a crime against humanity should be independently and impartially investigated, including at the icc. icc prosecutor karim khan recently confirmed that his office has since march 2021 been conducting an investigation into alleged atrocity crimes committed in gaza and the west bank since 2014, and that his office has jurisdiction over crimes in the current hostilities between israel and palestinian armed groups that covers unlawful conduct by all parties and on may 20, 2024, sought arrest warrants in relation to this ongoing palestine investigation.[458] human rights watch calls on the prosecutor to investigate israeli authorities’ forced displacement and prevention of the right to return as a crime against humanity. under international law, victims of violations of international human rights and humanitarian law are entitled to redress, including reparation. according to the un basic principles on the right to a remedy, victims of gross violations in particular have the right to receive “adequate, effective and prompt reparation for harm suffered.”[459] this right draws on the broader principle of a right to concrete and effective remedy in the face of violations.[460] victims of gross violations are “persons who individually or collectively suffered harm, including physical or mental injury, emotional suffering, economic loss or substantial impairment of their fundamental rights,” and include “the immediate family or dependents of the direct victim and persons who have suffered harm in intervening to assist victims in distress or to prevent victimization.”[461] reparation includes, among other aspects, restitution and compensation. compensation is due when restitution cannot be obtained.[462] palestinians in gaza are entitled to reparation for rights violations committed as part of crimes against humanity, for the displacement from their homes. the israeli government bears primary responsibility to provide victims with, or assist them in obtaining, compensation. in the recent international court of justice (icj) decision in the legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of israel in the occupied palestinian territory, including east jerusalem, the court held that “israel is under an obligation to provide full reparation for the damage caused by its internationally wrongful acts.”[463] the court went on to state that “restitution includes israel’s obligation to return the land... as well as all assets seized... since its occupation started in 1967…in the event that such restitution should prove to be materially impossible, israel has an obligation to compensate…”[464] human rights watch calls for the inclusion of all land and other property seized and / or damaged or destroyed as a result of the recent conflict, to this requirement to redress, including through any mechanisms and register set up to address the reparations israel owes to palestinians. though the term “ethnic cleansing” has no formal definition under international law, a un commission of experts defined it as a “purposeful policy designed by one ethnic or religious group to remove by violent and terror inspiring means the civilian population of another ethnic or religious group from certain geographic areas” where “the purpose appears to be the occupation of territory to the exclusion of the purged group or groups.”[465] the definition rests on three crucial components. “purposeful policy” designates coordinated actions by individuals and groups (whether formal or informal), acting in the pursuit of a common goal; qualifying acts as “purposeful policy” may rely on demonstrating the implication of government bodies, but does not require it. the second component, the “remov[al] by one ethnic or religious group the civilian population of another ethnic or religious group from a geographic area,” indicates that the policy aims at widespread displacement of a given group by another. finally, ethnic cleansing relies on “violent and terror inspiring means.” while it is beyond the scope of this report to analyze the group identities of palestinians and jewish israelis, it is clear that in the local context that palestinians and jewish israelis are regarded as separate identity groups that fall within the broad understanding of “ethnic or religious group.”[466] the palestinian national charter defines palestinians as “those arab nationals who, until 1947, normally resided in palestine,” emphasizing that the identity is “transmitted from parents to children.”[467] even within israel where both jews and palestinians are citizens, authorities classify jews and palestinians as belonging to different “nationalities.”[468] the un commission of experts further defined the means of ethnic cleansing to include crimes such as “murder, torture, arbitrary arrest and detention, extra judicial executions, rape and sexual assaults, confinement of civilian population in ghetto areas, forcible removal, displacement and deportation of civilian population, deliberate military attacks or threats of attacks on civilians and civilian areas, and wanton destruction or property.”[469] as this report makes clear, the acts of unlawful displacement in gaza were conducted through serious human rights violations and violations of international humanitarian law, including war crimes and crimes against humanity. the evidence in this report shows that israel has intentionally and purposefully displaced palestinians in gaza by means of forced displacement. it has used an evacuation system which has displaced people using violence and the fear of violence and has not kept people safe. the israeli army has attacked safe routes and safe zones and has created an environment where nowhere is safe in gaza. the actions of the israeli authorities in gaza are the actions of one ethnic or religious group to remove palestinians in gaza, members of another ethnic or religious group, from geographic areas in gaza by violent means. the organized, forced displacement of palestinians in gaza has removed much of the palestinian population from land that for decades and generations has been their home. nowhere is this clearer than in areas which have been razed, extended, and cleared for buffer zones and security corridors. these areas appear emptied and cleansed of palestinians and the intention and policies of the israeli authorities appears to be to ensure that these areas remain permanently emptied and cleansed of palestinians and under the occupation and control of israeli authorities. those who directed or took direct part in abuses made clear orally and in written statements their intention to remove palestinians from areas of gaza and in some instances beyond the borders of gaza. taken together, these acts indicate that, at least in the buffer zones and security corridors in gaza, the israeli authorities are pursuing a policy of ethnic cleansing. international human rights law guarantees refugees and exiles the right to enter the territory they are from, even where sovereignty is contested or has changed hands, and reside in areas where they or their families once lived and have maintained links to. article 13(2) of the universal declaration of human rights (udhr) states, “everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.”[470] in december 1948, following israel's establishment, the un general assembly passed resolution 194, which states: [r]efugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or in equity, should be made good by the governments or authorities responsible.[471] the right of return for palestinian refugees has been confirmed repeatedly by the un general assembly, including through resolution 3236, which “reaffirms also the inalienable right of the palestinians to return to their homes and property from which they have been displaced and uprooted, and calls for their return.”[472] under the rome statute, a distinct crime against humanity is “other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.”[473] the icc pre trial chamber in 2018 found with respect to the rohingya that preventing people from returning to their home can amount to the crime against humanity of other inhumane acts. it stated: the chamber notes that, following their deportation, members of the rohingya people allegedly live in appalling conditions in bangladesh and that the authorities of myanmar supposedly impede their return to myanmar. if these allegations were to be established to the required threshold, preventing the return of members of the rohingya people falls within article 7(1)(k) [other inhumane acts] of the statute. under international human rights law, no one may be arbitrarily deprived of the right to enter one’s own country. such conduct would, thus, be of a character similar to the crime against humanity of persecution, which “means the intentional and severe deprivation of fundamental rights contrary to international law.” furthermore, preventing a person from returning to his or her own country causes “great suffering, or serious injury […] to mental […] health.” in this manner, the anguish of persons uprooted from their own homes and forced to leave their country is deepened. it renders the victims’ future even more uncertain and compels them to continue living in deplorable conditions.[474] the prevention of return can amount to the crime against humanity of “other inhumane acts,” using the standard set out by an icc pre trial chamber in the bangladesh/myanmar situation. crimes against humanity have no time limit for prosecution. its application to the denial of the right to return has been recently summarized by a legal expert as: “those who had a sufficient connection with the place to which they were denied return are to be regarded as victims of a crime against humanity even if a long period has passed, and even if they currently no longer have a physical place to which to return.”[475] the forced displacement of a population will by its nature continue as long as those displaced are prevented from returning to their homeland. it should therefore be treated as a continuous crime, especially if the same state or entity responsible for the displacement remains responsible for the denial of the right of return. the un expert on addressing serious abuses committed in colonial contexts has stated that “it should be noted that there are also crimes that by their nature are continuous.”[476] the prevention of the right to return against the palestinians in gaza, forcibly displaced by the current hostilities, may amount to a crime against humanity. international humanitarian law prohibits “acts or threats of violence the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population.”[477] it has been shown that israel’s evacuation system in gaza was not a good faith attempt to evacuate the population in favor of the security of the population, and the imperative military reason to defeat hamas did not justify the disproportionate decision to evacuate the entirety of the population of north gaza to the south and push palestinians in gaza into smaller and smaller pockets as the war front extended to encompass nearly all of the territory. statements that called for the evacuation of areas that are not genuine warnings but are primarily intended to cause panic among residents or compel them to leave their homes for reasons other than their safety, would fall under this prohibition. previous caselaw has established that the atmosphere of terror in which a displacement takes place, is relevant to the question of whether it is a lawful evacuation, rather than forcible transfer.[478] in the prosecutor v. radislav krstić at the icty, the atmosphere of terror demonstrated that the true goal of the displacement of civilians from srebrenica in bosnia “was carried out in furtherance of a well organised policy whose purpose was to expel the bosnian muslim population from the enclave.”[479] interviewees uniformly described the atmosphere of terror that accompanied the displacement from their homes. this evacuation system may amount to acts of violence, the primary purpose of which is to spread terror, and should be investigated. the crime of persecution traces back to the 1945 international military tribunal in nuremberg. the tribunal’s charter recognizes “persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds” as crimes against humanity.[480] the rome statute also identifies persecution as a crime against humanity, defining it as “the intentional and severe deprivation of fundamental rights contrary to international law by reason of the identity of the group or collectivity.”[481] the statute broadened the scope of the crime to encompass “any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impressible under international law.”[482] the statute limits the crime to applying only “in connection with” other crimes identified under it.[483] the customary international law definition of persecution, though, includes no such limitation. israeli authorities have collectively punished and forcibly transferred the majority of the population in gaza by virtue of their identity as palestinians. these policies and systematic practices box in, dispossess, forcibly separate, marginalize, and otherwise inflict suffering on palestinians. based on the evidence set out in this report, human rights watch calls for the investigation of persecution in connection with forced displacement as a crime against humanity. the laws of war prohibit attacks directed at civilians or civilian objects, indiscriminate attacks, attacks that have disproportionate effects on civilians, as well as extensive destruction of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly. previous war crimes tribunals have held that a single act, if significant in scope such as the destruction of a hospital, may suffice to constitute the offense of unlawful and wanton destruction. ihl prohibits the destruction of civilian objects and of property seized from the adversary in the absence of military necessity.[484] wanton destruction of such property constitutes a war crime.[485] under the laws of war, civilian objects are any that are not military. military objectives are only those that by their nature, location, purpose, or use make an effective contribution to military action and whose partial or total destruction, capture, or neutralization, in the circumstances ruling at the time, offers a definite military advantage. human rights watch notes that many instances of widespread property damage may not be unlawful. human rights watch understands and has criticized hamas and other palestinian groups for firing rockets from populated areas. in such cases, property damage caused by israeli counterstrikes against armed groups may have been lawful “collateral damage.” given the widespread destruction throughout the conflict and gaza, as part of the war crime of forcible transfer, it is possible that many of the instances of such destruction would be a grave breach of the fourth geneva conventions of 1949, which is applicable in gaza. individuals responsible for committing or ordering such destruction should be prosecuted for war crimes. at the very least, where israel has demolished residential properties and civilian infrastructure and razed agricultural land to create a buffer zone, particularly in areas where fighting is not or no longer taking place, this could constitute wanton destruction and should be investigated. this report was researched and written by nadia hardman, researcher in the refugee and migrant rights division at human rights watch. gabi ivens, head of open source research in the digital investigations lab, as well as ekin ürgen, senior associate, and carolina jordá álvarez and léo martine, senior geospatial analysts in the digital investigations lab, conducted and wrote the open source and geospatial research for the report. this report was reviewed and edited by bill frelick, refugee and migrant rights director. the report was also reviewed and edited by sam dubberley, director of the technology, rights and investigations division, acting middle east and north africa division director, balkees jarrah, omar shakir, israel and palestine director, and acting israel and palestine associate director bill van esveld of the middle east and north africa division. it was also reviewed, juliana nnoko, senior researcher in the women’s rights division, elin martinez, senior researcher in the children’s rights division, matt mcconnell, researcher in the global health initiative of the economic justice and rights division, deborah brown, deputy director, and zach campbell, senior researcher, both in the technology, rights and investigations division, emina ćerimović, associate director in the disability rights division, gerry simpson, associate director in the conflict and crisis and arms division, and claudio francavilla, associate director in the advocacy department. michelle randhawa, senior officer in the refugee and migrant rights division, provided research, editing, and production assistance. clive baldwin, senior legal advisor, and tom porteous, deputy program director, provided legal and program reviews. production assistance was provided by travis carr, publications officer. ellie kealey, producer and editor in the multimedia team, produced the video accompanying the report. we are grateful to the palestinians in gaza who were willing to share their experiences, including tragic personal accounts. [1] see annex i for a full list including links of the evacuation orders analyzed for this report. when the number of evacuation orders referenced in the text surpasses ten, a footnote is provided with the assigned number for each evacuation order, as documented in the annex i. [2] international committee of the red cross (icrc), geneva convention iv (1949): article 49, https://ihl databases.icrc.org/en/ihl treaties/gciv 1949/article 49 (accessed may 6, 2024). [3] international court of justice (icj), legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of israel in the occupied palestinian territory, including east jerusalem, july 19, 2024 https://www.icj cij.org/sites/default/files/case related/186/186 20240719 adv 01 00 en.pdf (accessed october 22, 2024). [4] lara gibson, “how israel hamas war will test egypt's balancing act,” the new arab, october 11, 2023, https://www.newarab.com/analysis/how israel hamas war will test egypts balancing act (accessed may 6, 2024). [5] “gaza: israel’s ‘open air prison’ at 15,” human rights watch news release, june 14, 2022, https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/06/14/gaza israels open air prison 15; a threshold crossed: israeli authorities and the crimes of apartheid and persecution, april 27, 2021, https://www.hrw.org/report/2021/04/27/threshold crossed/israeli authorities and crimes apartheid and persecution. [6] mezan center for human rights, the gaza bantustan: israeli apartheid in the gaza strip, november 29, 2021, https://mezan.org/uploads/files/16381763051929.pdf (accessed may 6, 2024); human rights watch, a threshold crossed. [7] icrc, geneva convention iv (1949): article 49. [8] ibid. [9] ibid. [10] united nations international residual mechanism for criminal tribunals (irmct), “forcible transfer,” undated, https://cld.irmct.org/notions/show/370/forcible transfer (accessed october 17, 2024). [11] ibid. [12] icrc, geneva convention iv (1949): article 49. [13] international court of justice, legal consequences of the construction of a wall in the occupied palestinian territory, july 9, 2004, https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto insert 178825/ (accessed november 4, 2024). [14] prosecutor v. radislav krstić, case no. it 98 33 t, judgement, august 2, 2001, https://www.icty.org/x/cases/krstic/tjug/en/krs tj010802e.pdf (accessed november 4, 2024), p. 185. [15] icrc, convention (iv) relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of war, commentary of 1958, https://ihl databases.icrc.org/pt/ihl treaties/gciv 1949/article 49/commentary/1958?activetab=undefined (accessed november 4, 2024). [16] tovah lazaroff, “netanyahu: gazans should flee, idf to avenge ‘black day,’” the jerusalem post, october 7, 2023, https://www.jpost.com/arab israeli conflict/article 763179 (accessed november 4, 2024). [17] “war against hamas in gaza is act of self defence, israel tells world court,” un news, january 12, 2024, https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/01/1145452 (accessed november 4, 2024). [18] ibid. [19] thomas mulder, “evacuations in armed conflict: a fine line between a life saving measure and forced displacement,” ejil: talk!, october 9, 2024, https://www.ejiltalk.org/evacuations in armed conflict a fine line between a life saving measure and forced displacement/ (accessed october 17, 2024). [20] emma brandon, “grave breaches and justifications: the war crime of forcible transfer or deportation of civilians and the exception for evacuations for imperative military reasons,” oslo law review, vol. 6, no. 2, september 17, 2019, https://www.idunn.no/doi/10.18261/issn.2387 3299 2019 02 03 (accessed november 4, 2024), pp. 107 124. see also prosecutor v. blagojević & jokić, international criminal tribunal for the former yugoslavia, case no. it 02 60, judgment (trial chamber), january 17, 2005, https://www.refworld.org/jurisprudence/caselaw/icty/2005/en/91971 (accessed november 4, 2024), at 598  599: “‘evacuations in this latter situation may only be carried out when necessitated by overriding, i.e. imperative, military reasons. in considering whether these exceptions justify proven acts of forcible population displacements, the trier of fact will consider whether there was in actual fact a military or other significant threat to the physical security of the population, and whether the military operation in question was ‘imperative.’” [21] bethan mckernan and quique kierszenbaum, “we’re focused on maximum damage: gaza ground incursion seems imminent,” the guardian, october 10, 2023, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/10/right now it is one day at a time life on israels frontline with gaza (accessed november 4, 2024). the israeli military later stated that rear admiral hagari meant the military’s goal was “causing ‘maximum damage’ to hamas's military capabilities in their entirety,” rather than “exactly” or “accurately” choosing specific “hamas targets.” see israel defense forces (idf), “idf press release clarification,” december 25, 2023, https://www.idf.il/en/mini sites/israel at war/war on hamas 2023 resources/idf press release clarification/ (accessed november 4, 2024). [22] case 002/01, extraordinary chambers in the courts of cambodia, judgment (trial chamber), august 7, 2014, https://www.legal tools.org/doc/4888de/pdf/ (accessed may 6, 2024), at para 539: “instead, the leadership considered it preferable to expel the city’s population with little to no prior planning for the welfare of the evacuees during the journey, rather than to implement a staged evacuation, an option which was raised but rejected.” [23] “israel: starvation used as weapon of war in gaza,” human rights watch news release, december 18, 2023, https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/12/18/israel starvation used weapon war gaza. [24] “israel orders 1.1 million people in gaza to move south: what to know,” al jazeera, october 13, 2023, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/10/13/israel orders 1 1 million people in gaza to move south what to know (accessed may 6, 2024). [25] human rights watch, “i can’t erase all the blood from my mind”: palestinian armed groups’ october 7 assault on israel, july 17, 2024, https://www.hrw.org/report/2024/07/17/i cant erase all blood my mind/palestinian armed groups october 7 assault israel. [26] barak ravid, “netanyahu says ‘we are at war’ after hamas launches surprise invasion,” axios, october 7, 2023, https://www.axios.com/2023/10/07/hamas attack invasion israel death toll netanyahu (accessed november 4, 2024). [27] yoav gallant (@yoavgallant), post to x, october 9, 2023, https://twitter.com/yoavgallant/status/1711335592942875097 (accessed may 6, 2024). [28] israel katz (@israel_katz), post to x, october 9, 2023, https://twitter.com/israel_katz/status/1711332854070640935 (accessed may 6, 2024). [29] olivia flasch, “rebutting allegations of genocide against israel,” ejil:talk!, january 10, 2024, https://www.ejiltalk.org/rebutting allegations of genocide against israel/ (accessed november 4, 2024). [30] israel defense forces (@idf), post to x, october 8, 2024, https://x.com/idf/status/1711138315628372110 (accessed october 17, 2024). [31] human rights watch telephone interview with anas, january 12, 2024. [32] ibid. [33] ibid. [34] human rights watch telephone interview with anas, january 12, 2024. [35] ibid. [36] israel katz (@israel_katz), post to x, october 10, 2023, https://twitter.com/israel_katz/status/1712083122227909116?t=nd9apqymtpuxy4a0hhqfmw (accessed may 6, 2024). [37] “israel must rescind evacuation order for northern gaza and comply with international law,” office of the united nations high commissioner for human rights (ohchr) press release, october 13, 2023, https://www.ohchr.org/en/press releases/2023/10/israel must rescind evacuation order northern gaza and comply international (accessed may 6, 2024). [38] "humanitarian crisis unfolds in gaza," msnbc, october 13, 2023, https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/humanitarian crisis unfolds in gaza 195379781742 (accessed may 6, 2024); steve hendrix, louisa loveluck, et al., “israel orders 1 million gazans to evacuate; u.n. says that’s impossible,” the washington post, october 13, 2024, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/10/13/israel gaza hamas war west bank/ (accessed june 28, 2024). [39] israel defense forces (@idf), post to x, october 13, 2023, https://x.com/idf/status/1712707301369434398?s=20 (accessed may 6, 2024); israel defense forces (@idf), post to x, november 2, 2023, https://x.com/idf/status/1720213978092101955 (accessed june 25, 2024). [40] “note to correspondents on gaza,” united nations, latest statements, spokesman for the secretary general, october 12, 2023, https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/note correspondents/2023 10 12/note correspondents gaza (accessed october 31, 2024). [41] helen regan, caitlin hu, et al., “israel tells 1.1 million gazans to evacuate south. un says order is ‘impossible,’” cnn, october 13, 2023, https://edition.cnn.com/2023/10/13/middleeast/israel gaza hamas war friday intl hnk/index.html (accessed october 31, 2024). [42] “israel orders 1.1 million people in gaza to move south: what to know,” al jazeera, october 13, 2023, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/10/13/israel orders 1 1 million people in gaza to move south what to know (accessed may 6, 2024). [43] rageh omaar, “israeli president isaac herzog says gazans could have risen up to fight ‘evil’ hamas,” itv news, october 13, 2023, https://www.itv.com/news/2023 10 13/israeli president says gazans could have risen up to fight hamas (accessed may 6, 2024). [44] antónio guterres, “why israel must reconsider its gaza evacuation order,” united nations secretary general, october 13, 2023, https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/articles/2023 10 13/why israel must reconsider its gaza evacuation order (accessed may 30, 2024). [45] “israel must rescind evacuation order for northern gaza and comply with international law,” ohchr press release, october 13, 2023, https://www.ohchr.org/en/press releases/2023/10/israel must rescind evacuation order northern gaza and comply international (accessed may 6, 2024). [46] in the case of an attack that may affect the civilian population, the laws of war require the parties to give “effective advance warning” unless the situation does not permit it. what is “effective” depends on the circumstances, and if civilians are not able to leave for a safer area the warning will not be effective. see icrc, “rule 20. advance warning,” icrc customary ihl database, undated, https://ihl databases.icrc.org/en/customary ihl/v1/rule20 (accessed may 6, 2024). [47] icrc, “rule 20. advance warning.” [48] icrc, “rule 22. principle of precautions against the effects of attacks,” icrc customary ihl database, undated, https://ihl databases.icrc.org/en/customary ihl/v1/rule22 (accessed november 4, 2024); icrc, “rule 24. removal of civilians and civilian objects from the vicinity of military objectives,” icrc customary ihl database, undated, https://ihl databases.icrc.org/en/customary ihl/v1/rule24 (accessed november 4, 2024). [49] icj, “public sitting held on friday, january 12, 2024, at 10 a.m., at the peace palace, president donoghue presiding, in the case concerning application of the convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide in the gaza strip (south africa v. israel),” document number: 192 20240112 ora 01 00 bi, verbatim record, january 12, 2024, https://www.icj cij.org/node/203424 (accessed october 17, 2024). [50] icrc, geneva convention iv (1949): article 49. [51] “israel: starvation used as weapon of war in gaza,” human rights watch news release, december 18, 2023, https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/12/18/israel starvation used weapon war gaza. [52] forensic architecture, “humanitarian violence: israel’s abuse of preventative measures in its 2023 2024 genocidal military campaign in the occupied gaza strip,” march 7, 2024, https://content.forensic architecture.org/wp content/uploads/2024/03/humanitarian violence_report_fa.pdf (accessed may 6, 2024). [53] “the occupying power undertaking such transfers or evacuations shall ensure, to the greatest practicable extent…that the removals are effected in satisfactory conditions of…safety...” see icrc, geneva convention iv (1949): article 49. [54] avichay adraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, october 13, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1712683686213144638 (accessed march 26, 2024); israel defense forces (@idf), post to x, october 12, 2023, https://twitter.com/idf/status/1712825819691716748 (accessed may 6, 2024). [55] forensic architecture, “humanitarian violence: israel’s abuse of preventative measures in its 2023 2024 genocidal military campaign in the occupied gaza strip.” [56] although there are 620 blocks, they are not numbered sequentially, but rather blocks are assigned numbers ranging from one to 3,261. see “idf publishes list of block numbers to guide gaza residents in evacuating targeted areas” (“جيش الدفاع ينشر قائمة بأرقام بلوكات لتوجيه سكان غزة في إخلاء المناطق المستهدفة”), israeli defense forces news release, december 1, 2023, https://www.idf.il/ar/جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي/جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي/swordsofiron 011223 150/?itid=lk_inline_enhanced template (accessed may 6, 2024); anshel pfeffer, “the idf's confusing, ironic evacuation map for palestinians in gaza,” haaretz, december 6, 2023, https://www.haaretz.com/israel news/2023 12 06/ty article/.premium/the idfs confusing ironic evacuation map for palestinians in gaza/0000018c 3b63 de12 a3af 3bef79640000 (accessed may 6, 2024). [57] “idf publishes list of block numbers to guide gaza residents in evacuating targeted areas” (“جيش الدفاع ينشر قائمة بأرقام بلوكات لتوجيه سكان غزة في إخلاء المناطق المستهدفة”), israeli defense forces news release, december 1, 2023, https://www.idf.il/ar/جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي/جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي/swordsofiron 011223 150/?itid=lk_inline_enhanced template (accessed may 6, 2024); avichay adraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, december 1, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1730500179852173621 (accessed may 6, 2024). [58] human rights watch considered identical evacuation orders posted across official accounts as one distinct evacuation order. [59] forensic architecture, “humanitarian violence: israel’s abuse of preventative measures in its 2023 2024 genocidal military campaign in the occupied gaza strip.” [60] united nations office for the coordination of humanitarian affairs (ocha), “hostilities in the gaza strip and israel: flash update #56,” december 1, 2023, https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied palestinian territory/hostilities gaza strip and israel flash update 56 enarhe (accessed may 6, 2024). [61] internet society pulse, “internet disconnected in gaza,” internet shutdowns, active since october 7, 2023, https://pulse.internetsociety.org/shutdowns/internet disconnected in gaza (accessed may 6, 2024). [62] response letter from paltel group chief executive officer abdulmajeed melhem to human rights watch, november 14, 2023, https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/media_2023/11/gl.2023.11.14.response%20from%20paltel%20to%20human%20rights%20watch.pdf. [63] kevin collier, “gaza strip experiencing internet outages and electricity cuts after bombings,” nbc news, october 9, 2023, https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/gaza strip experiencing internet outages electricity cuts bombings rcna119564 (accessed june 28, 2024). [64] “blackout disconnects bombarded gazans from the world and each other,” reuters, october 28, 2023, https://www.reuters.com/world/middle east/blackout disconnects bombarded gazans world each other 2023 10 28/ (accessed may 6, 2024); ioda (@ioda_live), post to x, october 27, 2023, https://x.com/ioda_live/status/1717959029228462563?s=20 (accessed may 30, 2024). see also netblocks (@netblocks), post to x, october 27, 2023, https://twitter.com/netblocks/status/1717942556703551590?s=20 (accessed june 28, 2024); joseph gedeon and maggie miller, “internet blackout in gaza as israel expands operations,” politico, october 27, 2023, https://www.politico.com/news/2023/10/27/internet blackout gaza israel hamas war 00124029 (accessed june 28, 2024); ruby mellen and szu yu chen, “see how israel’s siege has plunged gaza into darkness and isolation,” the washington post, october 26, 2023, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/10/26/gaza israel siege blackout isolation/ (accessed june 28, 2024). [65] matt burgess, “the destruction of gaza’s internet is complete,” wired, october 27, 2023, https://www.wired.com/story/gaza internet blackout israel/ (accessed may 6, 2024); “#keepiton: telecommunications blackout in the gaza strip is an attack on human rights,” access now press release, october 13, 2023, https://www.accessnow.org/press release/communications blackout gaza strip/ (accessed may 6, 2024); “a week in the dark: connectivity in gaza must be restored now,” access now press release, january 18, 2024, https://www.accessnow.org/press release/gaza a week in the dark/ (accessed may 6, 2024). [66] paltel (@paltelco), post to x, january 22, 2024, https://x.com/paltelco/status/1749464176756449631 (accessed september 20, 2024) [67] the official social media platforms monitored include the x account and the facebook account of lt. col. avichay adraee, the israeli military’s spokesperson in arabic, and the facebook account of the coordinator of the government activities in the territories (cogat). [68] “al munasseq” (“المنسق”) [cogat arabic], post to facebook, october 21, 2023, https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=659277336312964&set=pb.100066921098856. 2207520000&type=3 (accessed may 6, 2024). [69] [70] avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, october 21, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1715766785662767273 (accessed november 4, 2024); “al munasseq” (“المنسق”) [cogat arabic], post to facebook, october 21, 2023, https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=659312296309468&set=a.285650167009018 (accessed may 27, 2024); avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, october 25, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1717089441292927335 (accessed november 4, 2024); افيخاي أدرعي  avichay adraee, post to facebook, november 13, 2023, https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=904243671067241&set=a.306770754147872 (accessed november 4, 2024); avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, november 14, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1724385295829815331 (accessed november 4, 2024); avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, december 3, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1731296821731873096 (accessed november 4, 2024); avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, december 9, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1733485933834449245 (accessed november 4, 2024); avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, march 18, 2024, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1769613852021231856 (accessed november 4, 2024); avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, july 28, 2024, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1817566489676791840 (accessed november 4, 2024). [71] “al munasseq” (“المنسق”) [cogat arabic], post to facebook, october 21, 2023, https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=659312296309468&set=a.285650167009018 (accessed may 27, 2024). [72] avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, october 25, 2023, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1717089441292927335 (accessed may 27, 2024). [73] see annex i. evacuation order numbers: 66, 67, 69, 70, 73, 87, 88, 102, 103, 104, 107, 152, 155, 158, 162, 179. [74] see annex i. evacuation order numbers: 66, 67, 69, 70, 73, 87, 88, 102, 103, 104, 107, 155. [75] avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, december 3, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1731170539023040697 (accessed may 6, 2023). [76] avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, december 3, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1731296821731873096 (accessed may 6, 2023). [77] avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, december 3, 2023, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1731296821731873096/photo/1 (accessed may 6, 2023). [78] “gaza: israeli military’s digital tools risk civilian harm,” human rights watch news release, september 10, 2024, https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/09/10/gaza israeli militarys digital tools risk civilian harm. in may 2024 human rights watch discovered data posted publicly online by the israeli military that included operational data apparently related to systems used for monitoring the evacuation and movement through gaza, as well as for calculating civilian harm before attacks. this data included what seem to be population figures consistent with years old census data from gaza, more updated and desegregated population data, as well as data about the israeli military's presence in gaza and cumulative figures of attacks, for each of the 620 blocks into which gaza was divided. the data also included personal information: surnames for the most populous families in each block. [79] ocha, “hostilities in the gaza strip and israel: flash update #58,” december 3, 2023, https://www.ochaopt.org/content/hostilities gaza strip and israel flash update 58 (accessed march 27, 2024). [80] see annex i. evacuation order numbers: 66, 67, 69, 70, 73, 79, 80, 87, 88, 96, 102, 103, 104, 107, 142, 143, 175, 177, 178, 181. [81] avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, july 1, 2024, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1807792175859536181/photo/1 (accessed july 8, 2024). [82] israel defense forces (@idf), post to x, july 2, 2024, https://x.com/idf/status/1807999218939748695 (accessed july 8, 2024). [83] cogat (@cogatonline), post to x, july 2, 2024, https://x.com/cogatonline/status/1808024656978247711 (accessed july 8, 2024). [84] “al munasseq” (“المنسق”) [cogat arabic], post to facebook, july 1, 2024, https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=800675305506499&set=pb.100066921098856. 2207520000 (accessed july 8, 2024). [85] “patients, medics flee south gaza hospital after evacuation orders, who says,” reuters, july 2, 2024, https://www.reuters.com/world/middle east/patients medics flee south gaza hospital after evacuation orders who says 2024 07 02/ (accessed september 9, 2024); “civilians forced to evacuate gaza’s khan younis, again,” al jazeera, july 2, 2024, https://aje.io/8zuruh?update=3020322 (accessed september 9, 2024); “gaza's european hospital in khan younis is ‘virtually empty’ after israel ‘evacuation order,’” the new arab, july 2, 2024, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/h6uqs7igydu (accessed september 9, 2024). [86] ocha, post to linkedin, july 4, 2024, https://www.linkedin.com/posts/united nations ocha_gaza activity 7214295772475908096 0ib6 (accessed july 8, 2024). [87] amira haas, “with hardly any internet access and confusing idf tweets, gazans don’t know where to go,” haaretz, december 7, 2023, https://www.haaretz.com/israel news/2023 12 07/ty article magazine/.premium/with hardly any internet access and confusing idf tweets gazans dont know where to go/0000018c 3e7b d53d a7fc beff3f3e0000 (accessed march 26, 2024). [88] avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, june 27, 2024, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1806264754068942966 (accessed september 27, 2024). [89] forensic architecture, “humanitarian violence: israel’s abuse of preventative measures in its 2023 2024 genocidal military campaign in the occupied gaza strip.” [90] avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, december 2, 2023, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1730849868447436881 (accessed march 26, 2024). [91] avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, december 2, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1730849877263786259/photo/1 (accessed march 26, 2024). [92] avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, december 3, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1731170539023040697 (accessed march 26, 2024); avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, december 4, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1731539367368241265 (accessed march 26, 2024). [93] avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, july 7, 2024, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1809963484022518268 (accessed july 8, 2024). [94] avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, july 8, 2024, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1810265410475823110 (accessed july 8, 2024). [95] jake tacchi, “israel struck some areas it directed civilians to in gaza, cnn analysis shows,” cnn, december 21, 2023, https://edition.cnn.com/2023/12/21/middleeast/israel strikes evacuation zones gaza intl cmd/index.html (accessed march 26, 2024). [96] see annex i. evacuation order numbers: 4, 6, 7, 9, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 83, 84, 85, 86, 88, 112, 113, 114, 116, 118, 119, 120, 121,122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 132. [97] see avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, october 21, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1715766785662767273 (accessed may 6, 2024). [98] “note to correspondents on gaza,” united nations, latest statements, spokesman for the secretary general, october 12, 2023, https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/note correspondents/2023 10 12/note correspondents gaza (accessed october 31, 2024). [99] avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, november 5, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1720917602522820925 (accessed march 26, 2024). [100] “al munasseq” (“المنسق”) [cogat arabic], post to facebook, november 13, 2023, https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=670985828475448&set=a.285650167009018 (accessed may 14, 2024). [101] see annex i. evacuation orders numbers: 29, 30, 31, 32, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 84, 85, 86, 88, 112, 113, 114, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126. [102] avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, october 13, 2023, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1712846493747495223 (accessed march 26, 2024). [103] avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, october 14, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1713065991511388610 (accessed may 6, 2024). [104] avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, october 15, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1713431675458200042 (accessed may 6, 2024). [105] sari bashi (human rights watch), “nowhere to go in gaza,” commentary, the new york review, october 13, 2023, https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/10/13/nowhere go gaza. [106] “the protection of the civilian population during sieges: what the law says,” icrc, february 5, 2024, https://www.icrc.org/en/document/protection civilian population during sieges what law says (accessed november 5, 2024). [107] united nations relief and works agency for palestine refugees in the near east (unrwa), “jabalia camp,” where we work, undated, https://www.unrwa.org/where we work/gaza strip/jabalia camp (accessed july 20, 2024). [108] human rights watch telephone interview with ghassan, february 9, 2024. [109] ibid. [110] human rights watch telephone interview with ghassan, february 9, 2024. [111] human rights watch telephone interview with omar, november 21, 2023. [112] ibid. [113] افيخاي أدرعي  avichay adraee, post to facebook, october 13, 2023, https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=881713343320274&set=a.306770754147872 (accessed june 25, 2024). [114] human rights watch telephone interview with omar, november 21, 2023. [115] human rights watch telephone interview with sahar, january 29, 2024. [116] ibid. [117] ibid. see also peter beaumont, “‘the buildings are now ashes’: nowhere feels safe from israeli bombs in gaza,” the guardian, october 12, 2023, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/12/the buildings are now ashes gazans feel nowhere is safe from israeli bombs (accessed may 6, 2024). [118] human rights watch telephone interview with sahar, january 29, 2024. [119] “gaza: israeli attacks, blockade devastating for people with disabilities,” human rights watch news release, november 1, 2023, https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/11/01/gaza israeli attacks blockade devastating people disabilities; “they destroyed what was inside us”: children with disabilities amid israel’s attacks on gaza, september 30, 2024, https://www.hrw.org/report/2024/09/30/they destroyed what was inside us/children disabilities amid israels attacks gaza. [120] un human rights council, independent international commission of inquiry on the occupied palestinian territory, including east jerusalem, and israel, “detailed findings on the military operations and attacks carried out in the occupied palestinian territory from 7 october to 31 december 2023,” a/hrc/56/crp.4, june 10, 2024, https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies/hrcouncil/sessions regular/session56/a hrc 56 crp 4.pdf (accessed november 5, 2024), para. 92. [121] human rights watch telephone interview with hala al ghoula, mother of ghazal, a 14 year old girl with cerebral palsy, january 12, 2024. for more on ghazal’s story, see human rights watch, “they destroyed what was inside us.” [122] jacob magid, “israel isn’t seeking to displace gazans or rule enclave, netanyahu reassures us,” the times of israel, november 10, 2023, https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel isnt seeking to displace gazans or rule enclave netanyahu reassures us/ (accessed may 31, 2024). [123] ocha, "hostilities in the gaza strip and israel: flash update #60," december 5, 2023, https://www.ochaopt.org/content/hostilities gaza strip and israel flash update 60 (accessed may 30, 2024). [124] the extraordinary chambers in the courts of cambodia (eccc), in case 002/01, highlighted that exposing people to significant risk negates any defence predicated on safeguarding the population. trial chamber, extraordinary chambers in the courts of cambodia, case 002/01 judgment, case no. 002/19 09 2007/eccc/tc, https://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/case/3312 (accessed may 6, 2024). [125] the independent international commission of inquiry on the occupied palestinian territory, including east jerusalem and israel, “detailed findings on the military operations and attacks carried out in the occupied palestinian territory from 7 october to 31 december 2023.” [126] human rights watch telephone interview with amina, january 21, 2024. the october 13 evacuation order told people to go south “for their safety.” [127] bethan mckernan and sufian taha, “gaza civilians afraid to leave home after bombing of ‘safe routes,’” the guardian, october 15, 2023, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/14/gaza civilians afraid to leave home after bombing of safe routes (accessed november 5, 2024). [128] robin stein, haley willis, et al., “a times investigation tracked israel’s use of one of its most destructive bombs in south gaza,” the new york times, december 21, 2023, https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/21/world/middleeast/israel gaza bomb investigation.html (accessed november 5, 2024); rozina ali (@rozina_ali), post to x, december 26, 2023, https://x.com/rozina_ali/status/1739764035640524812?s=46 (accessed may 6, 2024); qasim rashid, esq. (@qasimrashid), post to x, december 27, 2023, https://x.com/qasimrashid/status/1740134880032276723?s=46 (accessed may 6, 2024); marc owen jones, “fact or fiction: israel’s evacuation plan for the palestinians in rafah,” al jazeera, february 13, 2024, https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/2/13/fact or fiction israels evacuation plan for the palestinians in rafah (accessed may 6, 2024). a video posted on social media on october 30 shows an israeli tank along salah al din road, see “gaza: unlawful israeli hospital strikes worsen health crisis,” human rights watch news release, november 14, 2023, https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/11/14/gaza unlawful israeli hospital strikes worsen health crisis. [129] “gaza's salah al din highway ‘road of death in every sense of the word,’” al monitor, november 11, 2023, https://www.al monitor.com/originals/2023/11/gazas salah al din highway road death every sense word (accessed may 6, 2024). [130] unosat, “unosat gaza strip road network comprehensive damage assessment   august 2024,” september 9, 2024, https://unosat.org/products/3957 (accessed september 11, 2024). [131] avichay adraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, october 13, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1712846493747495223 (accessed may 6, 2024). [132] avichay adraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, october 14, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1713065991511388610 (accessed may 6, 2024). [133] avichay adraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, october 15, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1713431675458200042 (accessed may 6, 2024). [134] avichay adraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, october 16, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1713779715868110946 (accessed may 6, 2024). [135] avichay adraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, november 6, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1721438457526985143 (accessed may 6, 2024). [136] avichay adraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, november 9, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1722527895657005370 (accessed may 6, 2024) [137] avichay adraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, november 14, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1724326961336434934 (accessed may 6, 2024). [138] human rights watch telephone interview with rami, january 31, 2024. [139] ibid. [140] ibid. [141] human rights watch telephone interview with youssef, november 27, 2023. [142] human rights watch telephone interview with youssef, november 27, 2023. [143] a video posted on social media on october 30 shows an israeli tank along salah al din road, see “gaza: unlawful israeli hospital strikes worsen health crisis,” human rights watch news release, november 14, 2023, https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/11/14/gaza unlawful israeli hospital strikes worsen health crisis. [144] israel defense forces (@idf), post to x, november 13, 2023, https://x.com/idf/status/1724018068131557816/video/1 (accessed may 30, 2024); jake horton, merlyn thomas, daniele palumbo, “israel gaza war: dead bodies and tanks on road south as people flee,” bbc news, november 9, 2023 https://www.bbc.com/news/world middle east 67361128 (accessed may 30, 2024). [145] ibid. [146] human rights watch telephone interview with leila, january 10, 2024. [147] ibid. [148] ibid. [149] ibid. [150] ibid. [151] ibid. [152]human rights watch telephone interview with saleem, january 30, 2024. [153] wafaa shurafa, samy magdy, kareem chehayeb, “civilians fleeing northern gaza’s combat zone report a terrifying journey on foot past israeli tanks,” ap news, november 7, 2023, https://apnews.com/article/civilians fleeing gaza combat israel ground operation 656545c0bd132d5dc2b6d108687ff13e (accessed november 5, 2024). [154] ocha, “hostilities in gaza strip and israel: flash update #66,” december 11, 2023, https://www.ochaopt.org/content/hostilities gaza strip and israel flash update 66 (accessed may 6, 2024). [155] katy tur, “70 killed after convoys of evacuees in gaza hit by israeli strikes,” msnbc news, october 13, 2023, https://www.msnbc.com/katy tur/watch/70 killed after convoys of evacuees in gaza hit by israeli strikes 195213381735 (accessed may 6, 2024). [156] “video shows bodies on road south of israel besieged gaza city,” reuters, november 3, 2023, https://www.reuters.com/world/middle east/video shows bodies road south israel besieged gaza city 2023 11 03/ (accessed may 6, 2024). [157] mohammed al hajjar, lubna masarwa, et al., “gaza grandmother shot and killed by israeli sniper as child waved white flag,” middle east eye, january 10, 2024, https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/war gaza israel grandmother killed waving white flag (accessed september 6, 2024). [158] “shot in ‘cold blood’: killing of palestinian grandmother sparks outcry,” al jazeera, january 13, 2024, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/1/13/shot in cold blood killing of elderly palestinian woman sparks outcry (accessed may 30, 2024). [159] itv news (@itvnews), post to x, january 23, 2024, https://x.com/itvnews/status/1749925191835148442 (accessed june 3, 2024); john irvine, “moment innocent civilian brandishing white flag in gaza ‘safe zone’ is shot dead in the street,” itv news, january 25, 2024, https://www.itv.com/news/2024 01 23/moment civilian brandishing white flag in gaza safe zone is shot dead (accessed june 3, 2024). [160] yasmine salam and caroline radnofsky, “a group of palestinian men waving a white flag is shot at, killing 1,” nbc news, january 24, 2024, https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/gaza palestinian israel white flag shot dead killed rcna135419 (accessed june 3, 2024). [161] forensic architecture (@forensicarchi), post to x, january 26, 2024, https://x.com/forensicarchi/status/1750876558166741003 (accessed june 3, 2024). [162] “idf general answers questions about alleged war crimes in southern gaza,” abc news, january 29, 2024, https://abcnews.go.com/international/live updates/israel gaza hamas war/idf general answers questions about alleged war crimes in southern gaza 106755972?id=106753225 (accessed june 3, 2024). [163] avichay adraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, january 23, 2024, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1749716786818281575 (accessed september 20, 2024). [164] “two brothers shot by israeli forces in khan younis, white flag ignored,” al jazeera, january 29, 2024, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/1/29/two brothers shot by israeli forces in khan younis white flag ignored (accessed may 6, 2024). [165] jacob magid, “israel isn’t seeking to displace gazans or rule enclave, netanyahu reassures us,” the times of israel, november 10, 2023, https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel isnt seeking to displace gazans or rule enclave netanyahu reassures us/ (accessed may 31, 2024). [166] ibid. [167] united nations inter agency steering committee (iasc), “statement by principals of the inter agency standing committee, humanitarian chiefs will not take part in unilateral proposals to create ‘safe zones’ in gaza,” november 16, 2023, https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/about inter agency standing committee/statement principals inter agency standing committee humanitarian chiefs will not take part (accessed june 16, 2024). [168] ibid. [169] see hala gorani and briony sowden, “nbc news investigation reveals israel strikes on gaza areas it said were safe,” nbc news, april 26, 2024, https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/palestinians killed israeli strikes safe zones exclusive nbc report rcna148008 (accessed may 30, 2024); jake tacchi, “israel struck some areas it directed civilians to in gaza, cnn analysis shows,” cnn, december 21, 2023, https://edition.cnn.com/2023/12/21/middleeast/israel strikes evacuation zones gaza intl cmd/index.html (accessed may 30, 2024). [170] “‘safe zones’ for civilians in gaza impossible, un says,” dw, december 5, 2023, https://www.dw.com/en/israel hamas war idf strikes khan younis in southern gaza/live 67633542#liveblog post 67637807 (accessed november 5, 2024). [171] ibid. [172] ocha, “humanitarian situation update #227: gaza strip,” october 8, 2024, https://www.unocha.org/publications/report/occupied palestinian territory/humanitarian situation update 227 gaza strip (accessed november 5, 2024). [173] avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, may 6, 2024, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1787344298943365560 (accessed may 6, 2024); avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, may 11, 2024, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1789171670105636971 (accessed may 23, 2024). [174] israel defense forces (@idf), post to x, may 6, 2024, https://x.com/idf/status/1787347748737421635?lang=en (accessed may 6, 2024). [175] ocha, “hostilities in the gaza strip and israel: flash update #172,” may 29, 2024, https://www.ochaopt.org/content/hostilities gaza strip and israel flash update 172 (accessed july 20, 2024). [176] “the war in gaza must end   statement by martin griffiths, under secretary general for humanitarian affairs and emergency relief coordinator,” relief web, january 5, 2024, https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied palestinian territory/war gaza must end statement martin griffiths under secretary general humanitarian affairs and emergency relief coordinator 5 january 2024 enhear (accessed may 6, 2024). [177] nbc nightly news with lester holt (@nbcnightlynews), post to x, april 26, 2023, https://twitter.com/nbcnightlynews/status/1784001112124932600?s=46 (accessed may 6, 2024). [178] icj, “application of the convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide in the gaza strip (south africa v. israel)   request for the modification of the order of 28 march 2024   the court reaffirms its previous provisional measures and indicates new measures,” may 24, 2024, https://www.icj cij.org/sites/default/files/case related/192/192 20240524 pre 01 00 en.pdf (accessed may 30, 2024). [179] ocha, “mass evacuations in gaza choke survival and severely constrain aid operations,” statement by muhannad hadi, humanitarian coordinator for the occupied palestinian territory, august 22, 2024, https://www.ochaopt.org/content/mass evacuations gaza choke survival and severely constrain aid operations (accessed august 23, 2024). [180] nidal al mughrabi and ramadan abed, “gaza ceasefire hopes dim, families flee after new evacuation orders,” reuters, august 26, 2024, https://www.reuters.com/world/middle east/families flee after new israeli evacuation orders gaza ceasefire hopes dim 2024 08 26/ (accessed november 5, 2024). [181] tala ramadan, “baby paralysed in gaza's first case of type 2 polio for 25 years, who says,” reuters, august 23, 2024, https://www.reuters.com/world/middle east/baby paralysed gazas first case type 2 polio 25 years who says 2024 08 23/ (accessed november 5, 2024). [182] michelle nichols, “un aid operations in gaza halt after israel evacuation orders,” reuters, august 26, 2024, https://www.reuters.com/world/middle east/un aid operations gaza halted after israel evacuation orders 2024 08 26/(accessed august 27, 2024). [183] see avichay adraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, october 13, 2023, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1712846493747495223 (accessed june 26, 2024); avichay adraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, october 14, 2023, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1713065991511388610 (accessed june 26, 2024); avichay adraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, october 15, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1713431675458200042 (accessed june 26, 2024); avichay adraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, october 16, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1713779715868110946 (accessed june 26, 2024). [184] see ocha, "updates," undated, https://www.ochaopt.org/updates (accessed may 6, 2024). [185] airwars, “israel and gaza (2023),” undated, https://airwars.org/conflict/israel and gaza 2023/ (accessed may 6, 2024). [186] human rights watch telephone interview with dr. hassan, november 30, 2023. [187] ibid. [188] human rights watch telephone interview with hisham, january 11, 2024. [189] ibid. [190] ibid. [191] ibid. [192] human rights watch telephone interview with hisham, january 11, 2024. [193] dan sabbagh, “israel says its ground forces are operating across ‘all of gaza,’” the guardian, december 3, 2023, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/dec/03/fresh strike on jabaliya refugee camp reported as israel intensifies attacks on gaza (accessed may 6, 2024). [194] “gaza strip's khan younis declared as ‘war zone’ by israel army,” a news, december 1, 2023, https://www.anews.com.tr/world/2023/12/01/gaza strips khan younis declared as war zone by israel army (accessed may 6, 2024). [195] human rights watch telephone interview with rashad, december 1, 2023. [196] ibid. [197] human rights watch telephone interview with rashad, december 1, 2023. [198] “israeli forces carry out operation inside khan younis hospital,” voa news, february 15, 2024, https://www.voanews.com/a/health officials report israeli attack on khan younis hospital/7488543.html (accessed may 30, 2024); celine alkhaldi, ibrahim dahman, kareem khadder, “‘mass casualties’ as un shelter struck amid intense fighting in khan younis,” cnn, january 24, 2024, https://edition.cnn.com/2024/01/24/middleeast/khan younis gaza un shelter strike intl/index.html (accessed may 30, 2024). [199] human rights watch telephone interview with sara, january 4, 2024. [200] human rights watch telephone interview with sara, january 4, 2024. [201] ibid. [202] human rights watch telephone interview with sara, january 4, 2024. [203] human rights watch interview with sara, february 19, 2024. [204] ibid. [205] block 108 was not slated for evacuation on according to evacuation orders published on and around the date of the attack. see avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, december 3, 2023, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1731170539023040697 (accessed may 30, 2024); avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, december 4, 2023, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1731539367368241265 (accessed may 30, 2024); avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, december 6, 2023, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1732298414828797999 (accessed may 30, 2024); avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, december 7, 2023, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1732658906982203723 (accessed may 30, 2024); avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, december 8, 2023, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1733036333352767914 (accessed may 30, 2024). [206] avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, january 23, 2024, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1749716786818281575 (accessed may 30, 2024). [207] cogat (@cogatonline), post to x, october 18, 2023, https://x.com/cogatonline/status/1714497441091682646?s=20 (accessed may 6, 2024); wafaa shurafa, jack jeffery, isabel debre, “israel designates a safe zone in gaza. palestinians and aid groups say it offers little relief,” ap news, december 8, 2023, https://apnews.com/article/israel hamas war refugees displaced muwasi ca3860fafed03cb2333ad0bdf2379e31 (accessed november 5, 2024). [208] un, “unicef brings critical supplies to the isolated children of al mawasi,” unicef press release, march 30, 2005, https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto insert 195018/ (accessed september 27, 2024). [209] human rights watch used the evacuation orders posted by lt. col. adraee as the primary communication channel to monitor the changes in the humanitarian zone boundaries, apart from two instances where the boundary changes were delineated in post to x by lt. col. adraee about developments in the conflict and in an israeli military press release. [210] israel defense forces (@idf), post to x, april 28, 2024, https://x.com/idf/status/1784624831511626121 (accessed june 3, 2024). [211] avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, july 22, 2024, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1815247774117433358 (accessed september 11, 2024). [212] avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, july 27, 2024, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1817064860376510514 (accessed september 11, 2024); avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, august 11, 2024, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1822492670981259665 (accessed september 11, 2024); avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, august 16, 2024, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1824341497811980409 (accessed september 11, 2024); avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, august 21, 2024, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1826183693787947512 (accessed september 11, 2024); avichayadraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, august 25, 2024, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1827715577940750418 (accessed september 11, 2024). [213] ali harb and brian osgood, “israel war on gaza updates: south gaza attacks to continue   defence chief,” january 4, 2024, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2024/1/4/israel hamas war live bloody day for hezbollah tensions with israel soar (accessed may 30, 2024). [214] coordinator of government activities in the territories (cogat), "humanitarian efforts," last update november 3, 2024, https://govextra.gov.il/cogat/humanitarian efforts/home/ (accessed november 5, 2024). [215] “no safe place in gaza: 14 killed, mostly children, by israeli airstrikes near so called ‘humanitarian zone’ al mawasi,” save the children press release, january 4, 2024, https://www.savethechildren.org.uk/news/media centre/press releases/fourteen killed near humanitarian zone in gaza (accessed may 6, 2024). [216] ibid. [217] ibid. [218] ali harb and brian osgood, “israel war on gaza updates: south gaza attacks to continue   defence chief,” january 4, 2024, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2024/1/4/israel hamas war live bloody day for hezbollah tensions with israel soar (accessed may 30, 2024); “hamas accuses israel of hitting gaza ‘safe zone’ killing 14,” bbc news, january 4, 2024, https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world middle east 67879726 (accessed june 6, 2024). [219] “‘where is the humanity?’ asks eyewitness of deadly blasts in gaza’s khan younis,” nbc news, january 4, 2024, https://www.nbcnews.com/video/deadly explosions leave huge crater at camp in khan younis 201344069909 (accessed june 6, 2024); “palestinian human rights organisations demand an end to israel’s deliberate attacks on internally displaced persons,” al haq press release, january 5, 2024, https://www.alhaq.org/advocacy/22484.html (accessed june 27, 2024). [220] “gaza: israelis attacking known aid worker locations,” human rights watch news release, may 14, 2024, https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/05/14/gaza israelis attacking known aid worker locations. [221] “gaza: msf strongly condemns deadly israeli attack on staff and family shelter,” msf news release, february 22, 2204, https://msf.org.uk/article/gaza msf strongly condemns deadly israeli attack staff and family shelter (accessed june 5, 2024); olive enokido lineham, “israeli military ‘examining’ attack on gaza aid shelter after sky investigation,” sky news, march 27, 2024, https://news.sky.com/story/israeli military examining attack on gaza aid shelter after sky investigation 13098550 (accessed may 30, 2024). [222] halley willis, robin stein, et al., “‘we’re aware of the location’: aid groups in gaza coordinated with i.d.f. but still came under fire,” new york times, april 25, 2024, https://www.nytimes.com/video/world/100000009393031/aid groups gaza israel.html?te=1&nl=visual investigations&emc=edit_ntvi_20240425 (accessed june 5, 2024). [223] “gaza: msf strongly condemns deadly israeli attack on staff and family shelter,” msf news release, february 22, 2024, https://msf.org.uk/article/gaza msf strongly condemns deadly israeli attack staff and family shelter (accessed june 5, 2024. [224] olive enokido lineham, “israeli military ‘examining’ attack on gaza aid shelter after sky investigation,” sky news, march 27, 2024, https://news.sky.com/story/israeli military examining attack on gaza aid shelter after sky investigation 13098550 (accessed may 30, 2024). [225] “msf, gaza: israeli forces attack msf shelter in al mawasi,” msf news release, february 21, 2024, https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/latest/gaza israeli forces attack msf shelter al mawasi (accessed september 27, 2024). [226] “al mawasi: gaza’s ‘safe zone’ attacked for third time by israel,” al jazeera video report, march 10, 2024, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7avjvs8zbue (accessed june 5, 2024). [227] “there is no safe place in gaza,” palestinian centre for human rights video report, may 4, 2024, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6_ugdrxxu0&t=15s (accessed june 21, 2024). [228] “the occupation bombs the tents of the displaced in al mawasi, west of khan yunis” (“الاحتلال يقصف خيام النازحين في المواصي غرب خان يونس”), al jazeera arabic video report, march 10, 2024, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj1whvnfgj8 (accessed june 5, 2024). [229] by analyzing the shadows visible in the video showing a large smoke plume, human rights watch determined it was filmed at approximately 5:35 p.m. a man visible in the video has a digital watch showing 4:37, which human rights watch believes was likely incorrectly set to an hour behind because of the time change to israel daylight time three weeks prior on march 29, 2024. [230] human rights watch telephone interview with hisham, january 11, 2024. [231] human rights watch telephone interview with asma, january 26, 2024. [232] ibid. [233] avichay adraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, october 16, 2023, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1713967522985226327 (accessed june 25, 2024); avichay adraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, december 2, 2023, https://x.com/avichayadraee/status/1730849877263786259 (accessed june 25, 2024); guillaume maurice, “‘khan yunis is now a combat zone’: bombardments resume across the gaza strip,” france24, december 1, 2023, https://observers.france24.com/en/middle east/20231201 khan yunis is now a combat zone bombardments resume across the gaza strip (accessed june 25, 2024); avichay adraee (@avichayadraee), post to x, december 13, 2023, https://twitter.com/avichayadraee/status/1734938413508256150 (accessed june 25, 2024); times of gaza (@timesofgaza), post to x, december 25, 2023, https://x.com/timesofgaza/status/1739250888689197325 (accessed june 25, 2024). [234] “un says 800,000 people have fled rafah as israel kills dozens in gaza,” al jazeera, may 18, 2024, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/5/18/un says 800000 people have fled rafah as israel kills dozens in gaza (accessed may 20, 2024); ocha, “hostilities in the gaza strip and israel: flash update #172,” may 29, 2024, https://www.ochaopt.org/content/hostilities gaza strip and israel flash update 172 (accessed august 21, 2024). [235] helen regan, sophie jeong, et al., “gazans start leaving eastern rafah as israeli military orders evacuations,” cnn, may 6, 2024, https://edition.cnn.com/2024/05/06/middleeast/israel gaza eastern rafah evacuation notice hnk intl/index.html (accessed may 6, 2024). [236] sky news (@skynews), post to x, may 6, 2024, https://twitter.com/skynews/status/1787564656866836658?s=46 (accessed may 6, 2024). [237] human rights watch telephone interview with ziad, february 16, 2024. [238] human rights watch telephone interview with farah, january 29, 2024. [239] ibid. [240] “israel kills dozens in rafah strikes, frees two captives,” al jazeera, february 12, 2024, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/2/12/israel strikes rafah says two captives freed (accessed may 6, 2024). [241] abeer salman, jessie yeung, joshua berlinger, “israeli forces rescue 2 hostages as airstrikes kill around 100 palestinians in rafah,” cnn, february 12, 2024, https://edition.cnn.com/2024/02/12/middleeast/israel hostages rescued gaza rafah intl hnk/index.html (accessed august 25, 2024). [242] human rights watch telephone interview with hisham, january 11, 2024. [243] samy magdy and wafaa shurafa, “israeli strikes kill at least 37 palestinians, most in tents, near gaza’s rafah as offensive expands,” ap news, may 29, 2024, https://apnews.com/article/israel palestinians hamas war news 05 28 2024 21ea44e3b514d3f3f2bd26a33f157e48 (accessed august 21, 2024). [244] “gaza: israeli attacks on two displaced persons’ camps in rafah should be investigated as war crimes,” amnesty international press release, august 27, 2024, https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press releases/gaza israeli attacks two displaced persons camps rafah should be investigated war (accessed august 27, 2024). [245] ibid. [246] aaron boxerman, “a border crossing shuttered for months traps the sick and wounded in gaza,” the new york times, july 19, 2024, https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/19/world/middleeast/rafah palestinians gaza trapped.html (accessed august 23, 2024). [247] “hamas tells gaza residents to stay put as israel ground offensive looms,” reuters, october 13, 2023, https://www.reuters.com/world/middle east/hamas tells gaza residents stay home israel ground offensive looms 2023 10 13/ (accessed june 11, 2024). [248] nicola slawson, “hamas tells gaza city residents to stay put after israel orders evacuation,” the guardian, october 13, 2023, https://www.theguardian.com/us news/2023/oct/13/first thing hamas tells gaza city residents to stay put after israel orders evacuation (accessed june 11, 2024). [249] “idf: gaza resident says hamas preventing evacuations; thousands return north,” the times of israel, october 26, 2023, https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf gaza resident says hamas preventing evacuations thousands return north/ (accessed may 6, 2024); “hamas actively preventing palestinians from leaving gaza: israel defence forces,” the economic times, october 16, 2023, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/hamas actively preventing palestinians from leaving gaza israel defence forces/articleshow/104444023.cms?from=mdr (accessed november 5, 2024). [250] “idf: gaza resident says hamas preventing evacuations; thousands return north,” the times of israel, october 26, 2023, https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf gaza resident says hamas preventing evacuations thousands return north/ (accessed may 6, 2024). [251] ibid. [252] “hamas acts to prevent northern gazans from fleeing south,” foundation for defense of democracies (fdd) flash brief, october 15, 2023, https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2023/10/15/hamas acts to prevent northern gazans from fleeing south/ (accessed may 6, 2024). [253] the independent international commission of inquiry on the occupied palestinian territory, including east jerusalem and israel, “detailed findings on the military operations and attacks carried out in the occupied palestinian territory from 7 october to 31 december 2023,” paras. 116 and 119. [254] icrc, “rule 22. principle of precautions against the effects of attacks,” icrc customary ihl database, undated, https://ihl databases.icrc.org/en/customary ihl/v1/rule22 (accessed november 4, 2024); icrc, “rule 24. removal of civilians and civilian objects from the vicinity of military objectives,” icrc customary ihl database, undated, https://ihl databases.icrc.org/en/customary ihl/v1/rule24 (accessed november 4, 2024). [255] icrc, “rule 97. human shields,” icrc customary ihl database, undated, https://ihl databases.icrc.org/en/customary ihl/v1/rule97 (accessed november 4, 2024). [256] israel katz (@israel_katz), post to x, october 11, 2023, https://twitter.com/israel_katz/status/1712356130377113904 (accessed may 6, 2024). [257] icrc, geneva convention iv (1949): article 49. [258] icrc, convention (iv) relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of war, commentary of 1958, https://ihl databases.icrc.org/pt/ihl treaties/gciv 1949/article 49/commentary/1958?activetab=undefined (accessed november 4, 2024). [259] see section “intention to forcibly transfer.” [260] a. kayum ahmed, “israeli authorities’ cutting of water leading to public health crisis in gaza,” commentary, human rights watch dispatch, november 16, 2023, https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/11/16/israeli authorities cutting water leading public health crisis gaza; “israel: unlawful gaza blockade deadly for children,” october 18, 2023, https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/10/18/israel unlawful gaza blockade deadly children; sari bashi (human rights watch), “gaza's blocked relief,” commentary, the new york review of books, october 30, 2023, https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/10/30/gazas blocked relief. [261] bethan mckernan, "no power, water or fuel to gaza until hostages freed, says israeli minister," the guardian, october 12, 2023, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/12/no power water or fuel to gaza until hostages freed says israeli minister (accessed may 30, 2024). [262] bushra khalidi, “the world cannot stand by as starvation is used as a weapon of war in gaza,” oxfam, november 19, 2023, https://views voices.oxfam.org.uk/2023/11/world cannot stand by starvation gaza/ (accessed june 28, 2024). [263] human rights watch, a threshold crossed. [264] “gaza faces widespread hunger as food systems collapse, warns wfp,” world food programme (wfp) news release, november 16, 2023, https://www.wfp.org/news/gaza faces widespread hunger food systems collapse warns wfp (accessed may 6, 2024). [265] “wfp palestine emergency response external situation report #10,” reliefweb, december 3, 2023, https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied palestinian territory/wfp palestine emergency response external situation report 10 03 december 2023 (accessed may 6, 2024). [266] wfp, “gaza   food security assessment   6 december 2023,” december 6, 2023, https://www.wfp.org/publications/gaza food security assessment december 2023 (accessed may 6, 2024). [267] “un experts declare famine has spread throughout gaza strip,” un office of the high commissioner for human rights (ohchr) press release, july 9, 2024, https://www.ohchr.org/en/press releases/2024/07/un experts declare famine has spread throughout gaza strip (accessed november 5, 2024). [268] “gaza: un experts call on international community to prevent genocide against palestinian people,” ohchr press release, november 16, 2023, https://www.ohchr.org/en/press releases/2023/11/gaza un experts call international community prevent genocide against (accessed may 6, 2024). [269] ocha, “hostilities in gaza strip and israel: flash update #40,” november 15, 2023, https://www.ochaopt.org/content/hostilities gaza strip and israel flash update 40 (accessed may 6, 2024). [270] “israel: starvation used as weapon of war in gaza,” human rights watch news release, december 18, 2023, https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/12/18/israel starvation used weapon war gaza. [271] “critical infrastructure collapsing in gaza,” unops press release, november 7, 2023, https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied palestinian territory/critical infrastructure collapsing gaza (accessed may 7, 2024). [272] isabel debre, “gaza has become a moonscape in war. when the battles stop, many fear it will remain uninhabitable,” ap news, november 23, 2023, https://apnews.com/article/palestinians gaza israel bombing destruction hamas reconstruction f299a28410b70ee05dd764df97d8d3a0 (accessed november 5, 2024). [273] bushra khalidi, “the world cannot stand by as starvation is used as a weapon of war in gaza,” oxfam, november 19, 2023, https://views voices.oxfam.org.uk/2023/11/world cannot stand by starvation gaza/ (accessed june 28, 2024). [274] ocha, “hostilities in gaza strip and israel: flash update #51,” november 26, 2023, https://www.ochaopt.org/content/hostilities gaza strip and israel flash update 51 (accessed may 7, 2024). [275] “impact of the israeli occupation aggression on the agricultural sector in gaza strip, 2023,” palestinian central bureau of statistics (pcbs) press release, november 28, 2023, https://www.pcbs.gov.ps/site/512/default.aspx?tabid=512&lang=en&itemid=4643&mid=3171 (accessed may 7, 2024). [276] integrated food security phase classification (ipc), “gaza strip: ipc acute food insecurity and acute malnutrition special snapshot,” october 17, 2024, https://www.ipcinfo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ipcinfo/docs/ipc_gaza_strip_acute_food_insecurity_malnutrition_sep2024_apr2025_special_snapshot.pdf (accessed november 4, 2024). [277] icj, application of the convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide in the gaza strip (south africa v. israel), “order of 26 january 2024,” january 26, 2024, https://www.icj cij.org/sites/default/files/case related/192/192 20240126 ord 01 00 en.pdf (accessed may 7, 2024). [278] icj, application of the convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide in the gaza strip (south africa v. israel), order on south africa’s request for the modification of the order of 26 january 2024 indicating provisional measures, “order of 28 march 2024,” march 28, 2024, https://www.icj cij.org/sites/default/files/case related/192/192 20240328 ord 01 00 en.pdf (accessed november 5, 2024), para. 18. [279] jennifer hansler, “usaid administrator says it is ‘credible’ to assess famine is already occurring in parts of gaza,” cnn, april 11, 2024, https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/11/politics/samantha power famine gaza/index.html (accessed may 7, 2024). [280] niha masih, “crutches and chocolate croissants: gaza aid items israel has rejected,” the washington post, april 11, 2024, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/04/11/israel aid gaza banned blocked/ (accessed may 7, 2024). [281] niha masih, “crutches and chocolate croissants: gaza aid items israel has rejected,” the washington post, april 11, 2024, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/04/11/israel aid gaza banned blocked/ (accessed may 7, 2024). [282] ibid. [283] ibid. [284] tamara qiblawi, allegra goodwin, et al., “anesthetics, crutches, dates. inside israel’s ghost list of items arbitrarily denied entry into gaza,” cnn, march 2, 2024, https://edition.cnn.com/2024/03/01/middleeast/gaza aid israel restrictions investigation intl cmd/index.html (accessed november 5, 2024). [285] “key aid crossing into gaza closed after rocket attack kills israeli soldiers,” the guardian, may 6, 2024, https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/06/key aid crossing into gaza closed after rocket attack kills israeli soldiers (accessed may 7, 2024). [286] “application of the convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide in the gaza strip (south africa v. israel)   request for the modification of the order of 28 march 2024   the court reaffirms its previous provisional measures and indicates new measures,” icj press release, may 24, 2024, https://www.icj cij.org/sites/default/files/case related/192/192 20240524 pre 01 00 en.pdf (accessed may 30, 2024). [287] ibid. [288] “humanitarian system for more than 2 million civilians in gaza facing total collapse, secretary general warns, once again urging ceasefire, aid delivery at scale needed,” un press release, october 27, 2023, https://press.un.org/en/2023/sgsm22010.doc.htm (accessed november 5, 2024). [289] “how much food is israel letting into northern gaza?,” bbc news, october 17, 2024, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c77x05l5ze4o (accessed november 5, 2024). [290] “a matter of life and death: water runs out for 2 million people in gaza,” unrwa official statement, october 14, 2023, https://www.unrwa.org/newsroom/official statements/matter life and death water runs out 2 million people gaza (accessed august 26, 2024); tal schneider, “israel cuts electricity supply to gaza,” the times of israel, october 7, 2023, https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/israel cuts electricity supply to gaza/ (accessed august 26, 2024); ocha, “hostilities in the gaza strip and israel: flash update #120,” february 16, 2024, https://www.unocha.org/publications/report/occupied palestinian territory/hostilities gaza strip and israel flash update 120 (accessed august 26, 2024). see also unicef, “immediate needs document in the state of palestine (october   december 2023),” october 17, 2023, https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied palestinian territory/immediate needs document state palestine october december 2023 (accessed october 17, 2023). [291] un, eu, and world bank, “gaza strip interim damage assessment,” march 29, 2024, https://palestine.un.org/sites/default/files/2024 04/gaza interim damage assessment final.pdf (accessed august 27, 2024); ocha, “hostilities in the gaza strip and israel: flash update #101,” january 24, 2024, https://www.unocha.org/publications/report/occupied palestinian territory/hostilities gaza strip and israel flash update 101 enarhe (accessed august 27, 2024); oxfam, “water war crimes: how israel has weaponized water in its military campaign in gaza,” july 18, 2024, https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/621609/bp water war crimes 180724 en.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed august 27, 2024); sari bashi (human rights watch), “gaza's blocked relief,” commentary, the new york review of books, october 30, 2023, https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/10/30/gazas blocked relief; “israel not complying with world court order in genocide case,” human rights watch news release, february 26, 2024, https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/02/26/israel not complying world court order genocide case; “gaza war inflicts catastrophic damage on infrastructure and economy,” reuters, november 17, 2023, https://www.reuters.com/world/middle east/gaza war inflicts catastrophic damage infrastructure economy 2023 11 17/ (accessed august 26, 2024). [292] “statement of the humanitarian coordinator for the occupied palestinian territory, lynn hastings,” ocha press release, december 4, 2023, https://www.un.org/unispal/document/statement of the humanitarian coordinator for the occupied palestinian territory lynn hastings/ (accessed june 28, 2024). [293] “following us pressure, israel approves increase of fuel deliveries to gaza,” the times of israel, december 7, 2023, https://www.timesofisrael.com/following us pressure israel approves increase of fuel deliveries to gaza/ (accessed june 28, 2023). [294] ocha, “electricity in the gaza strip,” undated, https://www.ochaopt.org/page/gaza strip electricity supply (accessed may 30, 2024). [295] ibrahim dahman, “gaza’s sole power station stops working as fuel runs out, after israel orders ‘complete’ blockade,” cnn, october 11, 2023, https://edition.cnn.com/2023/10/11/middleeast/gaza power plant shuts down intl/index.html (accessed may 7, 2024). [296] “fuel crisis in gaza: a barrier to essential humanitarian operations, highlights of the noon briefing by spokesperson for the un secretary general (excerpt on the crisis situation in gaza),” un secretary general, july 25, 2024, https://www.un.org/unispal/document/highlights of the noon briefing 25jul24/ (accessed november 5, 2024). [297] “critical infrastructure collapsing in gaza,” unops press release, november 7, 2023, https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied palestinian territory/critical infrastructure collapsing gaza (accessed may 7, 2024). [298] ocha, "hostilities in gaza strip and israel: flash update #120," february 16, 2024, https://www.unocha.org/publications/report/occupied palestinian territory/hostilities gaza strip and israel flash update 120 (accessed may 7, 2024). [299] ocha, “gaza humanitarian response update: 30 september   13 october 2024,” october 15, 2024, https://www.ochaopt.org/content/gaza humanitarian response update 30 september 13 october 2024 (accessed november 5, 2024). [300] see international covenant on civil and political rights (iccpr), adopted december 16, 1966, g.a. res. 2200a (xxi), 21 u.n. gaor supp. (no. 16) at 52, u.n. doc. a/6316 (1966), 999 u.n.t.s. 171, entered into force march 23, 1976, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments mechanisms/instruments/international covenant civil and political rights (accessed may 7, 2024); international covenant on economic, social and cultural rights (icescr), adopted december 16, 1966, g.a. res. 2200a (xxi), 21 u.n. gaor supp. (no. 16) at 49, u.n. doc. a/6316 (1966), 993 u.n.t.s. 3, entered into force january 3, 1976, ratified by israel on october 3, 1991, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments mechanisms/instruments/international covenant economic social and cultural rights (accessed may 7, 2024). [301] un general assembly, “report of the united nations high commissioner for human rights,” e/2015/59, may 19, 2015, https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/g15/100/88/pdf/g1510088.pdf (accessed september 16, 2024), para. 16. [302] ibid., paras. 17 19. [303] un general assembly, “report of the united nations high commissioner for human rights,” e/2015/59, may 19, 2015, para. 35(a). [304] ibid., para. 19. [305] ibid., para. 38. [306] ibid., para 36. [307] human rights watch telephone interview with omar, november 21, 2023. [308] human rights watch telephone interview with youssef, november 27, 2023. [309] ibid. [310] nour abu aisha, “displaced children in gaza use schools for shelter, not learning,” anadolu agency, november 11, 2023, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle east/displaced children in gaza use schools for shelter not learning/3050486 (accessed november 5, 2024); “displaced gazans seek shelter in unrwa schools,” middle east monitor, october 8, 2023, https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20231008 displaced gazans seek shelter in unrwa schools/ (accessed may 8, 2024); nidal al mughrabi, “gaza's main hospital becomes teeming camp for displaced people,” reuters, november 7, 2023, https://www.reuters.com/world/middle east/gazas main hospital becomes teeming camp displaced people 2023 11 07/ (accessed may 8, 2024); nada al taher, “gaza's hospitals have become unsafe shelters housing tens of thousands, red crescent says,” the national, october 31, 2023, https://www.thenationalnews.com/mena/palestine israel/2023/10/31/gazas hospitals have become unsafe shelters housing tens of thousands red crescent says/ (accessed may 8, 2024). [311] human rights watch telephone interview with sami, november 29, 2023. [312] robert inlakesh (@falasteen47), post to x, october 18, 2023, https://twitter.com/falasteen47/status/1714740424995426434 (accessed may 9, 2024). [313] human rights watch telephone interview with sami, november 29, 2023. [314] human rights watch telephone interview with yusra, november 29, 2023. [315] human rights watch telephone interview with yusra, november 29, 2023. [316] human rights watch telephone interview with nadine, december 5, 2023. [317] human rights watch telephone interview with saeed, december 12, 2023. [318] human rights watch telephone interview with tarek, december 20, 2023. [319] icrc, convention (iv) relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of war, commentary of 1958, https://ihl databases.icrc.org/pt/ihl treaties/gciv 1949/article 49/commentary/1958?activetab=undefined (accessed november 4, 2024). [320] “over 1.8 million in gaza face extreme hunger,” un palestine news release, october 18, 2024, https://palestine.un.org/en/281476 over 18 million gaza face extreme hunger (accessed october 22, 2024). [321] eileen travers, “how aid is (and is not) getting into gaza,” un news, september 16, 2024, https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/09/1154401 (accessed november 5, 2024); “new famine alert for gaza where families go days without food,” un news, june 25, 2024, https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/06/1151416 (accessed november 5, 2024). [322] eileen travers, “how aid is (and is not) getting into gaza,” un news, september 16, 2024, https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/09/1154401 (accessed november 5, 2024). [323] josep borrell, “gaza: starvation and bloodbath,” european external action service blog post, march 5, 2024, https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/gaza starvation and bloodbath_en (accessed november 6, 2024). [324] see federico andreu guzmán, “criminal justice and forced displacement: international and national perspectives,” international center for transitional justice research brief, june 2013, https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ictj research brief displacement criminal justice andreu guzman.pdf (accessed november 6, 2024). [325] united nations institute for training and research (unitar), “gaza: debris generated by the current conflict is 14 times more than the combined sum of all debris generated by other conflicts since 2008,” august 1, 2024, https://unitar.org/about/news stories/news/gaza debris generated current conflict 14 times more combined sum all debris generated other (accessed november 5, 2024). [326] “more war debris in gaza than ukraine: un,” business recorder, may 1, 2024, https://www.brecorder.com/news/40301262 (accessed may 9, 2024). [327] edith m. lederer, “the unprecedented destruction of housing in gaza hasn’t been seen since world war ii, the un says,” ap news, may 2, 2024, https://apnews.com/article/un report gaza destruction housing economy recovery 4f61dcca7db3fd5eb3da5c6a25001e12 (accessed november 6, 2024). [328] türk especially noted demolitions in beit hanoun in northern gaza, shuja’iyya in gaza city, and nuseirat camp in middle gaza. “widespread destruction by israeli defence forces of civilian infrastructure in gaza,” ohchr press release, february 8, 2024, https://www.ohchr.org/en/press releases/2024/02/widespread destruction israeli defence forces civilian infrastructure gaza (accessed november 6, 2024). [329] ibid. [330] ibid. [331] world bank economic monitoring report, note on the impacts of the conflict in the middle east on the palestinian economy, february 2024, https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/db985000fa4b7237616dbca501d674dc 0280012024/original/palestinianeconomicnote feb2024 final.pdf (accessed may 10, 2024). [332] “un relief chief: war in gaza must end,” ocha news, january 5, 2024, https://www.unocha.org/news/un relief chief war gaza must end (accessed may 30, 2024). [333] “‘listening to the agony’ in gaza: humanitarians struggle to meet needs of displaced,” un news, july 17, 2024, https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/07/1152201 (accessed august 27, 2024). [334] unosat, “gaza strip comprehensive damage assessment   september 2024,” september 29, 2024, https://unosat.org/products/3984 (accessed october 1, 2024). human rights watch excluded from damaged buildings the ones categorized as “possibly damaged” from unosat assessment. [335] “msf briefing on gaza to un security council,” médecins sans frontières news release, february 22, 2024, https://www.msf.org/msf briefing gaza un security council (accessed november 6, 2024). [336] reliefweb, “medical aid for palestinians (map) update on the hospital situation in gaza,” may 13, 2024, https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied palestinian territory/medical aid palestinians map update hospital situation gaza 13 may 2024 1240 (accessed may 30, 2024). [337] who occupied palestinian territory, “opt emergency situation update, issue 36,” overview as of july 15, 2024, https://www.emro.who.int/images/stories/sitrep_ _issue_36c.pdf?ua=1 (accessed november 6, 2024). [338] undp, “gaza war: expected socioeconomic impacts on the state of palestine,” may 2024, https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2024 05/2400257e gaza_war _expected_socioeconomic_impacts pb.pdf (accessed may 30, 2024). [339] fadwa hodali, fares akram, et al., “gaza reduced to 42 million tonnes of rubble. what will it take to rebuild?,” bloomberg, august 15, 2024, https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2024 gaza who will pay to rebuild/ (accessed august 27, 2024). [340] niels de hoog, antonio voce, et al., “how war destroyed gaza's neighbourhoods: visual investigation,” the guardian, january 30, 2024, https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng interactive/2024/jan/30/how war destroyed gazas neighbourhoods visual investigation (accessed may 10, 2024). [341] ibid. [342] alice cuddy, “‘i’m calling from israeli intelligence. we have the order to bomb. you have two hours,’” bbc news, november 8, 2023, https://www.bbc.com/news/world middle east 67327079 (accessed november 6, 2024). see also alice cuddy, “the end of gaza’s most beautiful neighbourhood,” bbc news, october 2024, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/extra/85jpwipoyz/gaza_al_zahra (accessed may 10, 2024). [343] human rights watch telephone interview with lina, december 1, 2023. lina is a relative of an hrw staff member. [344] ibid. [345] ibid. [346] alice cuddy, “the end of gaza’s most beautiful neighbourhood,” bbc news, october 2024, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/extra/85jpwipoyz/gaza_al_zahra (accessed may 10, 2024). [347] yaniv kubovich, “israeli army occupies gaza homes   then burns them down,” haaretz, january 31, 2024, https://www.haaretz.com/israel news/2024 01 31/ty article/.premium/israeli army occupies gaza homes then burns them down/0000018d 6021 d16e a39f 7f3f01e30000 (accessed may 10, 2024). [348] rania abushamala, “nearly 3,000 houses burnt out by israel in gaza, media office says,” anadolu agency, february 7, 2024, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle east/nearly 3 000 houses burnt out by israel in gaza media office says/3130829 (accessed may 10, 2024). [349] “israeli forces are brutally targeting civilians in gaza city, burning homes near shifa medical complex,” euro med human rights monitor, march 22, 2024, https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/6236/israeli forces are brutally targeting civilians in gaza city, burning homes near shifa medical complex (accessed may 10, 2024). [350] sarah el deeb, “forced from their gaza home by israeli troops, a family makes a frightening walk through a war zone,” ap news, april 2, 2024, https://apnews.com/article/gaza family home evacuation israel troops f1d9838c60225a8c454e372df72ca245 (accessed november 6, 2024). [351] ibid. [352] “damage to gaza causing new risks to human health and long term recovery   new unep assessment,” unep press release, june 18, 2024, https://www.unep.org/news and stories/press release/damage gaza causing new risks human health and long term recovery (accessed november 6, 2024). see also unep, environmental impact of the conflict in gaza: a preliminary assessment of environmental impacts, june 18, 2024, https://www.unep.org/resources/report/environmental impact conflict gaza preliminary assessment environmental impacts (accessed august 27, 2024). [353] food and agriculture organization, “overview of the damage to agricultural land and infrastructure due to the conflict in the gaza strip as of 15 february 2024,” february 28, 2024, https://www.fao.org/geospatial/resources/detail/fr/c/1678061 (accessed may 30, 2024). [354] unosat, “unosat fao gaza strip cropland damage assessment   august 2024,” august 30, 2024, https://unosat.org/products/3939 (accessed september 4, 2024). [355] emma cunliffe, nibal muhesen, marina lostal, “the destruction of cultural property in the syrian conflict: legal implications and obligations,” international journal of cultural property, vol. 23 (2016), https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop cambridge core/content/view/5b81e9c84c7f9b24fa0c4f1e9fa50caf/s0940739116000011a.pdf/the destruction of cultural property in the syrian conflict legal implications and obligations.pdf (accessed february 26, 2024). [356] “images show major damage to gaza's oldest mosque,” bbc news, december 8, 2023, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world middle east 67664853 (accessed november 6, 2024); بلدية غزة   municipality of gaza, post to facebook, december 8, 2024, https://www.facebook.com/munigaza/posts/694974936071126?ref=embed_post (accessed november 6, 2024). [357] nesrine malik, “what does it mean to erase a people   a nation, culture, identity? in gaza, we are beginning to find out,” the guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/dec/18/gaza israel destroying culture and identity (accessed november 6, 2024); “hamas says gaza mosque destroyed, urges unesco to save heritage,” al jazeera, december 8, 2023, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/12/8/hamas says gaza mosque destroyed urges unesco to save heritage (accessed february 21, 2024). [358] karen zraick and ameera harouda, “israeli airstrike hits greek orthodox church compound in gaza city,” the new york times, october 20, 2024, https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/20/world/middleeast/israel airstrike gaza city.html (accessed november 6, 2024); nidal al mughrabi, “orthodox church says it was hit by israeli air strike in gaza,” reuters, october 20, 2023, https://www.reuters.com/world/orthodox church says it was hit by israeli air strike gaza 2023 10 20/ (accessed february 21, 2024); ylenia gostoli and abdelhakim abu riash, “‘we were baptised here and we will die here’: gaza’s oldest church bombed,” al jazeera, october 20, 2023, https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2023/10/20/we were baptised here and we will die here gazas oldest church bombed (accessed february 21, 2024); tessa solomon, “historic greek orthodox church in gaza damaged in deadly air strike,” artnews, october 20, 2023, https://www.artnews.com/art news/news/historic greek orthodox church gaza damaged air strike 1234683834/ (accessed february 21, 2024). the church has long served as a shelter for palestinian christians and muslims. in 2014, the church sheltered around 1,000 palestinian muslims seeking refuge from israeli shelling. [359] “gaza strip: damage assessment,” unesco, october 11, 2024, https://www.unesco.org/en/gaza/assessment (accessed october 30, 2024). [360] “gaza endowments: 1,000 mosques out of 1,200 in the strip were destroyed” (“أوقاف غزة: 1000 مسجد من أصل 1200 في القطاع دُمِّرُوا”), quds press, january 21, 2024, https://qudspress.com/110966/ (accessed may 10, 2024). [361] reha kansara and ahmed nour, “israel gaza war: counting the destruction of religious sites,” bbc news, january 29, 2024, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world middle east 67983018 (accessed may 10, 2024). [362] “un experts deeply concerned over ‘scholasticide’ in gaza,” ohchr press release, april 18, 2024, https://www.un.org/unispal/document/un experts deeply concerned over scholasticide in gaza ohchr press release/ (accessed september 12, 2024). [363] occupied palestinian territory education cluster, verification of damages to schools based on proximity to damaged sites in gaza, occupied palestinian territory: update 5, july 2024, https://educationcluster.app.box.com/s/231cnzxfyeqz4ftipms3wbf90oo72uts (accessed september 9, 2024), p. 7. [364] ibid., p. 10. [365] ibid., p. 8. [366] occupied palestinian territory education cluster, verification of damages to schools based on proximity to damaged sites in gaza, occupied palestinian territory: update 5, p. 11. [367] scholars at risk network, academic freedom monitoring project, “islamic university of gaza,” october 10, 2023, https://www.scholarsatrisk.org/report/2023 10 10 islamic university of gaza/ (accessed september 12, 2024). [368] schools at risk network, academic freedom monitoring network, “al aqsa university,” january 22, 2024, https://www.scholarsatrisk.org/report/2023 01 22 al aqsa university/ (accessed september 12, 2024). [369] scholars at risk network, academic freedom monitoring project, “al israa university,” january 17, 2024, https://www.scholarsatrisk.org/report/2024 01 17 al israa university/ (accessed september 12, 2024). [370] scholars at risk network, academic freedom monitoring project, “university college of science and technology, palestine,” january 7, 2024, https://www.scholarsatrisk.org/report/2024 01 07 university college of science and technology palestine/ (accessed september 12, 2024). [371] scholars at risk network, academic freedom monitoring project, “al azhar university,” november 6, 2023, https://www.scholarsatrisk.org/report/2023 11 06 al azhar university/ (accessed september 12, 2024). [372] scholars at risk network, academic freedom monitoring project, “al quds open university,” november 15, 2023, https://www.scholarsatrisk.org/report/2023 11 15 al quds open university/ (accessed september 12, 2024). [373] “un experts deeply concerned over ‘scholasticide’ in gaza,” ohchr press release, april 18, 2024, https://www.un.org/unispal/document/un experts deeply concerned over scholasticide in gaza ohchr press release/ (accessed september 12, 2024). [374] “un experts deeply concerned over ‘scholasticide’ in gaza,” ohchr press release, april 18, 2024, https://www.un.org/unispal/document/un experts deeply concerned over scholasticide in gaza ohchr press release/ (accessed september 12, 2024). [375] leanne abraham, bora erden, et al., “israel’s controlled demolitions are razing neighborhoods in gaza,” the new york times, february 1, 2024, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/02/01/world/middleeast/israel gaza war demolish.html (accessed may 7, 2024). [376] ibid. [377] bellingcat, “we've become addicted to explosions”: the idf unit responsible for demolishing homes across gaza, april 29, 2024, https://www.bellingcat.com/news/2024/04/29/weve become addicted to explosions the idf unit responsible for demolishing homes across gaza/ (accessed may 30, 2024). [378] ibid. [379] ibid. [380] ibid. [381] ibid. [382] see icrc, “military necessity,” glossary, undated, https://casebook.icrc.org/node/20549 (accessed november 6, 2024); icrc, “wanton destruction,” glossary, undated, https://casebook.icrc.org/a_to_z/glossary/wanton destruction (accessed november 6, 2024). [383] see icrc, “wanton destruction,” glossary, undated, https://casebook.icrc.org/a_to_z/glossary/wanton destruction (accessed november 6, 2024); icrc, “war crimes,” glossary, undated, https://casebook.icrc.org/a_to_z/glossary/war crimes (accessed november 6, 2024). [384] un institute for training and research (unitar), “unosat gaza strip comprehensive damage assessment 1km stretch of land from the armistice demarcation line,” april 11, 2024, https://unosat.org/products/3820 (accessed may 7, 2024). [385] unitar, “unosat gaza strip agricultural damage analysis 1km stretch of land from the armistice demarcation line,” april 11, 2024, https://unosat.org/products/3821 (accessed may 7, 2024); [386] james shotter and neri zilber, “israel plans buffer zone in gaza after hamas war,” financial times, october 19, 2023, https://www.ft.com/content/2139346d 1605 4a6f bb58 340045c3cf44 (accessed november 6, 2024). [387] alex kane, “an israeli ‘buffer zone’ could shape gaza’s post war reality,” jewish currents, february 6, 2024, https://jewishcurrents.org/an israeli buffer zone could shape gazas post war reality (accessed may 7, 2024). [388] “satellite photos show new demolition within israeli buffer zone in gaza,” the times of israel, february 2, 2024, https://www.timesofisrael.com/satellite photos show new demolition within israeli buffer zone in gaza/ (accessed june 14, 2024); [389] camille bressange, dion nissenbaum, et al., “how israel’s proposed buffer zone reshapes the gaza strip,” the wall street journal, march 16, 2024, https://www.wsj.com/world/middle east/israel gaza hamas war buffer zone explained 2a7347af (accessed october 21, 2024) [390] עמיחי שיקל   amichai chikli (@amichaichikli), post to x, january 18, 2024, https://twitter.com/amichaichikli/status/1747886114713571431 (accessed may 16, 2024). [391] abdirahim saeed, tom spencer, et al., “idf completes road across width of gaza, satellite images show,” bbc news, march 9, 2024, https://www.bbc.com/news/world middle east 68514821 (accessed may 7, 2024). [392] aric toler (@arictoler), post to x, march 28, 2024, https://twitter.com/arictoler/status/1773394096125612340/photo/3 (accessed may 7, 2024). [393] yarden michaeli, bar peleg, avi sharf, “housing, showers, electrical infrastructure: this is what the outposts that the idf is establishing in the heart of the gaza strip look like” (“מגורים, מקלחות, תשתיות חשמל: כך נראים המוצבים שצה"ל מקים בלב רצועת עזה”), haaretz, april 18, 2024, https://www.haaretz.co.il/news/security/2024 04 18/ty article magazine/.premium/0000018e f03c d240 a19f f43f6da50000 (accessed may 7, 2024). [394] “israel/opt: israeli military must be investigated for war crime of wanton destruction in gaza,” amnesty international news release, september 5, 2024, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/09/israel opt israeli military must be investigated for war crime of wanton destruction in gaza new investigation/ (accessed november 6, 2024). [395] ibid. [396] ibid. [397] united nations mine action service (unmas), “occupied palestinian territory,” updated as of september 2024, https://www.unmas.org/en/programmes/state palestine (accessed november 6, 2024). [398] james shotter and neri zilber, “israel plans buffer zone in gaza after hamas war,” financial times, october 19, 2023, https://www.ft.com/content/2139346d 1605 4a6f bb58 340045c3cf44 (accessed november 6, 2024). [399] prosecutor v. radovan karadžić, case no. it 95 5/18 t, trial chamber, march 24, 2016, http://www.icty.org/x/cases/karadzic/tjug/en/160324_judgement.pdf (accessed may 30, 2024). [400] ibid. [401] international residual mechanism for criminal tribunals (irmct), “forcible transfer,” undated, https://cld.irmct.org/notions/show/370/forcible transfer# (accessed may 7, 2024). [402] ibid. [403] prime minister of israel (@israelipm), post to x, january 10, 2024, https://x.com/israelipm/status/1745186120109846710 (accessed may 31, 2024). [404] ibid. [405] prime minister of israel (ראש ממשלת ישראל) (@israelipm_heb), post to x, october 7, 2023, https://twitter.com/israelipm_heb/status/1710743179165647022?s=20 (accessed may 10, 2024). [406] emanuel fabian, “defense minister announces ‘complete siege’ of gaza: no power, food or fuel,” the times of israel, october 9, 2023, https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/defense minister announces complete siege of gaza no power food or fuel/ (accessed may 30, 2024). [407] no comment tv, “we are fighting human animals,” youtube, october 9, 2024, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbpdr3e4hck (accessed may 10, 2024). [408] bethan mckernan and quique kierszenbaum, “we’re focused on maximum damage: gaza ground incursion seems imminent,” the guardian, october 10, 2023, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/10/right now it is one day at a time life on israels frontline with gaza (accessed november 4, 2024). [409] israel katz (@israel_katz), post to x, october 13, 2023, https://twitter.com/israel_katz/status/1712876230762967222 (accessed may 10, 2024). [410] “israeli minister on gaza: ‘losing land is price arabs understand,’” al jazeera, october 17, 2023, https://www.aljazeera.com/program/newsfeed/2023/10/17/israeli minister losing land is price arabs (accessed may 10, 2024). [411] samer badawi, “is israel preparing another nakba for gaza?,” +972 magazine, october 19, 2023, https://www.972mag.com/gaza nakba sinai egypt israel/ (accessed may 10, 2024). [412] amichai eliyahu עמיחי אליהו, post to facebook, november 1, 2023, https://www.facebook.com/eliyau.a/videos/148918588283326/ (accessed may 10, 2024). [413] michael hauser tov, “‘we’re rolling out nakba 2023,’ israeli minister says on northern gaza strip evacuation,” november 12, 2023, https://www.haaretz.com/israel news/2023 11 12/ty article/israeli security cabinet member calls north gaza evacuation nakba 2023/0000018b c2be dea2 a9bf d2be7b670000 (accessed may 10, 2024); middle east eye, “israeli minister admits of ‘a nakba of gaza,’” youtube, november 11, 2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uz2dohu6drk (accessed may 10, 2024). [414] yehuda shaul (@yehudashaul), post to x, december 26, 2023, https://twitter.com/yehudashaul/status/1739641272350962084/photo (accessed may 10, 2024). [415] bezalel smotrich, post to facebook, november 14, 2023, https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid036uqrhgjtnem4ptjwwbfen66cwcgap4zdqsmhcwuwe7pq5fmjaeewpasyyhnr95cbl&id=100050298347371&_rdr (accessed may 10, 2024). [416] “israeli lawmakers keep pushing for transfer under the guise of humanitarian aid,” haaretz, december 27, 2023, https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/editorial/2023 12 27/ty article opinion/israeli lawmakers keep pushing for transfer under the guise of humanitarian aid/0000018c a7d6 df5f a79c e7ff4d150000 (accessed may 10, 2024). [417] gil feldman (@feldman_gil), post to x, december 30, 2023, https://twitter.com/feldman_gil/status/1741155910452494364 (accessed may 10, 2024). [418] “israeli minister repeats call for palestinians to leave gaza,” reuters, december 31, 2023, https://www.reuters.com/world/middle east/israeli minister repeats call palestinians leave gaza 2023 12 31/ (accessed may 10, 2024). [419] sam sokol, “far right ministers call to ‘resettle’ gaza’s palestinians, build settlements in strip,” the times of israel, january 1, 2024, https://www.timesofisrael.com/ministers call for resettling gazas palestinians building settlements in strip (accessed may 10, 2024). [420] jeremy sharon, “cabinet members call to resettle gaza, encourage gazans to leave, at jubilant conference,” the times of israel, january 29, 2024, https://www.timesofisrael.com/12 ministers call to resettle gaza encourage gazans to leave at jubilant conference (accessed may 10, 2024). [421] איתמר בן גביר itamar ben gvir (@itamarbengvir), post to x, january 28, 2024, https://twitter.com/itamarbengvir/status/1751678765904601363 (accessed may 10, 2024). [422] איתמר בן גביר itamar ben gvir (@itamarbengvir), post to x, february 6, 2024, https://twitter.com/itamarbengvir/status/1754923436881674506 (accessed may 14, 2024). [423] יערה שפירא yaara shapira (@yaara_shapira), post to x, march 19, 2024, https://twitter.com/yaara_shapira/status/1770058283132293354 (accessed may 14, 2024). [424] noa shpigel, “israel's far right minister smotrich calls for 'no half measures' in the 'total annihilation' of gaza,” haaretz, april 30, 2024, https://www.haaretz.com/israel news/2024 04 30/ty article/.premium/smotrich calls for no half measures in the total annihilation of gaza/0000018f 2f4c d9c3 abcf 7f7d25460000 (accessed may 16, 2024). [425] jeremy sharon, “ben gvir calls to ‘encourage emigration,’ resettle gaza at ultra nationalist rally,” the times of israel, may 14, 2024, https://www.timesofisrael.com/ben gvir calls to encourage emigration resettle gaza at ultra nationalist rally/ (accessed october 17, 2024. [426] jeremy sharon, “senior ministers call for new settlements in gaza at ultranationalist conference,” the times of israel, october 21, 2024, https://www.timesofisrael.com/government ministers call for new settlements in gaza at ultranationalist conference/ (accessed october 23, 2024). [427] “netanyahu: israel has no intention of permanently occupying gaza,” middle east eye, january 10, 2024, https://www.middleeasteye.net/live blog/live blog update/netanyahu israel has no intention permanently occupying gaza (accessed october 23, 2024); “we’re protecting you: full text of netanyahu’s address to congress,” the times of israel, july 25, 2024, https://www.timesofisrael.com/were protecting you full text of netanyahus address to congress/ (accessed october 23, 2024). [428] “gaza: israel’s dehumanisation of displaced persons must end, says un expert,” office of the united nations high commissioner for human rights (ohchr) press release, march 6, 2024, https://www.ohchr.org/en/press releases/2024/03/gaza israels dehumanisation displaced persons must end says un expert (accessed may 14, 2024). see also “israel working to expel civilian population of gaza, un expert warns,” ohchr press release, december 22, 2023, https://www.ohchr.org/en/press releases/2023/12/israel working expel civilian population gaza un expert warns (accessed november 6, 2024). [429] geneva convention for the amelioration of the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea, adopted august 12, 1949, 75 u.n.t.s. 85, entered into force october 21, 1950; protocol additional to the geneva conventions of 12 august 1949, and relating to the protection of victims of international armed conflicts (protocol i), adopted june 8, 1977, 1125 u.n.t.s. 3, entered into force december 7, 1978. [430] icrc, geneva convention iv (1949): articles 49 and 147; article 85(4)(a) of additional protocol i prohibit forcible transfer and article 18 of the 1996 ilc draft code also contains a similar prohibition. [431] international criminal court (icc), elements of crimes, 2013, https://www.icc cpi.int/sites/default/files/publications/elements of crimes.pdf (accessed november 6, 2024). [432] united nations international residual mechanism for criminal tribunals (irmct), “forcible transfer,” undated, https://cld.irmct.org/notions/show/370/forcible transfer (accessed october 17, 2024); irmct, “forcible displacement,” undated, https://cld.irmct.org/notions/show/369/forcible displacement (accessed november 6, 2024). [433] article 58 of additional protocol i requires that parties to the conflict, “to the maximum extent feasible,” take the necessary precautions to protect civilians and civilian objects under their control from the dangers resulting from military operations, including seeking to remove civilians and civilian objects under their control from the vicinity of military targets. [434] international crimes database, the evacuation of eastern aleppo: forced displacement under international law?, january 2019, https://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/upload/documents/20190109t160612 icd%20brief_dec2018forced%20displacement%20in%20syria%20as%20a%20crime%20under%20international%20law.pdf (accessed november 6, 2024), p. 12. [435] y sandoz, c swinarski, b zimmermann (eds), commentary on the additional protocols of 8 june 1977 to the geneva conventions of 12 august 1949, 1987, https://www.icrc.org/en/publication/0421 commentary additional protocols 8 june 1977 geneva conventions 12 august 1949 (accessed may 14, 2024). [436] the icrc's customary ihl database and emphasize that the displacement of civilians is a measure of last resort and subject to stringent conditions to prevent abuse of this provision and provides that any evacuation must be in the interest of the civilian population themselves. icrc, “commentary on article 49 of the fourth geneva convention, 1949,” 1958, https://ihl databases.icrc.org/en/ihl treaties/gciv 1949/article 49/commentary/1958?activetab=undefined (accessed may 14, 2024). [437] icrc, geneva convention iv (1949): article 49. [438] prosecutor v krstić (radislav), case no it 98 33 a, appeal judgment, icl 306 (icty 2004), april 19, 2004, https://www.icty.org/x/cases/krstic/acjug/en/ (accessed may 7, 2024). [439] prosecutor v. radislav krstić, case no. it 98 33 t, judgement, august 2, 2001, https://www.icty.org/x/cases/krstic/tjug/en/krs tj010802e.pdf (accessed november 4, 2024), p. 185. [440] see integrated food security phase classification (ipc), “gaza strip: ipc acute food insecurity and acute malnutrition special snapshot,” october 17, 2024, https://www.ipcinfo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ipcinfo/docs/ipc_gaza_strip_acute_food_insecurity_malnutrition_sep2024_apr2025_special_snapshot.pdf (accessed november 4, 2024). [441] prosecutor v. blagojević & jokić, international criminal tribunal for the former yugoslavia, case no. it 02 60, judgment (trial chamber), january 17, 2005, https://www.refworld.org/jurisprudence/caselaw/icty/2005/en/91971 (accessed may 15, 2024). [442] prosecutor v naletilić & martinović (trial chamber judgment), icty 98 34 t, march 31, 2003, https://www.refworld.org/jurisprudence/caselaw/icty/2003/en/40183 (accessed may 15, 2024), paras. 512 571. [443] see bethan mckernan and quique kierszenbaum, “we’re focused on maximum damage: gaza ground incursion seems imminent,” the guardian, october 10, 2023, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/10/right now it is one day at a time life on israels frontline with gaza (accessed november 4, 2024). [444] see bezalel smotrich, post to facebook, november 14, 2023, https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid036uqrhgjtnem4ptjwwbfen66cwcgap4zdqsmhcwuwe7pq5fmjaeewpasyyhnr95cbl&id=100050298347371&_rdr (accessed may 10, 2024). [445] history of the united nations war crimes commission and the development of the laws of war (1943), p. 179, quoted in rodney dixon, “crimes against humanity,” in commentary on the rome statute of the international criminal court (o. triffterer, ed.) (1999), p. 123. [446] “decision on the prosecutor’s request related to territorial jurisdiction over palestine,” icc pre trial chamber press release, february 5, 2021, https://www.un.org/unispal/document/icc pre trial chamber i issues its decision on the prosecutors request related to territorial jurisdiction over palestine press release/ (accessed november 6, 2024). palestine lodged a declaration under article 12(3) of the rome statute accepting the jurisdiction of the icc for crimes committed in its territory since june 2014, see icc, “state of palestine,” icc 01/18, https://www.icc cpi.int/palestine (accessed november 6, 2024). [447] rome statute of the international criminal court (rome statute), a/conf.183/9, july 17, 1998, entered into force july 1, 2002, https://www.icc cpi.int/resource library/documents/rs eng.pdf (accessed november 6, 2024), art. 7. [448] rome statute, art 7(2)(a). [449] rome statute, art. 7(1)(d); art. 7(2)(d). [450] icc, situation in bangladesh/myanmar, decision on the “prosecution's request for a ruling on jurisdiction under article 19(3) of the statute,” pre trial chamber i, september 6, 2018, para. 55. [451] “icc welcomes palestine as a new state party,” icc press release, april 1, 2015, https://www.icc cpi.int/news/icc welcomes palestine new state party (accessed may 15, 2024). [452] “palestine declares acceptance of icc jurisdiction since 13 june 2014,” icc press release, january 5, 2015, https://www.icc cpi.int/news/palestine declares acceptance icc jurisdiction 13 june 2014 (accessed may 15, 2024). [453] prosecutor v. jean paul akayesu, international criminal tribunal for rwanda (appeals chamber), case ictr 96 4 a, ictr trial chamber, september 2, 1998, para. 579; kordic & cerkez, international criminal tribunal for the former yugoslavia (icty), case it 95 14/2, icty trial chamber, february 26,2001, para. 179; the prosecutor v. clement kayishema and obed ruzindana, international criminal tribunal for rwanda, case ictr 95 1 a, ictr trial chamber, may 21, 1999, para. 123. [454] rome statute, article 7(2)(a). [455] united nations security council, “as israel’s aerial bombardments intensify, ‘there is no safe place in gaza,’ humanitarian affairs chief warns security council,” document no. sc/15564, january 12, 2024, https://press.un.org/en/2024/sc15564.doc.htm (accessed may 14, 2024). [456] ocha, “humanitarian situation update #188   gaza strip,” july 8, 2024, https://www.un.org/unispal/document/ocha sitrep 188 08jul24/ (accessed november 6, 2024). [457] human rights watch, a threshold crossed. [458] “statement by prosecutor karim a.a. khan kc on the situation in the state of palestine,” icc press release, november 17, 2023, https://www.icc cpi.int/news/statement prosecutor international criminal court karim aa khan kc situation state palestine (accessed may 14, 2024); “israel/palestine: icc prosecutor requests arrest warrants,” human rights watch news release, may 20, 2024, https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/05/20/israel/palestine icc prosecutor requests arrest warrants. [459] united nations general assembly, basic principles and guidelines on the right to a remedy and reparation for victims of gross violations of international human rights law and serious violations of international humanitarian law, march 21, 2006, https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2021 08/n0549642.pdf (accessed july 18, 2023). [460] international commission of jurists, “the right to a remedy and reparation for gross human rights violations, a practitioner's guide,” revised edition, 2018, https://www.icj.org/wp content/uploads/2018/11/universal right to a remedy publications reports practitioners guides 2018 eng.pdf (accessed july 18, 2023), pp. 52 84; theo van boven, “victims' right to a remedy and reparation: the new united nations principles and guidelines,” https://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/r26214.pdf (accessed july 18, 2023), p. 22. [461] un basic principles on the right to a remedy, principle 8. [462] international commission of jurists, “the right to a remedy and reparation for gross human rights violations, a practitioner's guide,” revised edition, 2018, pp. 156. [463] international court of justice, summary of the advisory opinion of 19 july 2024, document number 186 20240719 sum 01 00 en, july 19, 2024, https://www.icj cij.org/node/204176 (accessed november 6, 2024). [464] ibid. [465] united nations security council, letter dated 24 may 1994 from the secretary general to the president of the security council, may 27, 1994, https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n94/200/60/pdf/n9420060.pdf (accessed november 6, 2024). [466] article 1 of the convention on the elimination of all forms of racial discrimination notes that “‘racial discrimination’ shall mean any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, color, descent, or national or ethnic origin. ohchr, international convention on the elimination of all forms of racial discrimination, december 21, 1965, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments mechanisms/instruments/international convention elimination all forms racial (accessed november 6, 2024). [467] see the avalon project, yale law school, “the palestinian national charter, the palestinian national charter: resolutions of the palestine national council,” july 1 17, 1968, https://avalon.law.yale.edu/21st_century/plocov.asp (accessed november 6, 2024). [468] human rights watch, a threshold crossed. [469] united nations security council, letter dated 24 may 1994 from the secretary general to the president of the security council, may 27, 1994, https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n94/200/60/pdf/n9420060.pdf (accessed november 6, 2024). [470] universal declaration of human rights (udhr), adopted december 10, 1948, g.a. res. 217a(iii), u.n. doc. a/810 at 71 (1948), art. 13(2). [471] unrwa, “resolution 194,” undated, https://www.unrwa.org/content/resolution 194 (accessed august 6, 2024). [472] united nations, “resolution 3236 (xxix): question of palestine,” november 22, 1974, https://www.un.org/unispal/wp content/uploads/2016/05/ares3236xxix.pdf (accessed august 6, 2024). [473] rome statute, art. 7(1)(k). [474] icc, situation in bangladesh/myanmar, decision on the “prosecution's request for a ruling on jurisdiction under article 19(3) of the statute,” pre trial chamber i, september 6, 2018, para. 77. [475] tomer levinger, “denying the right of return as a crime against humanity,” israel law review, 54(2), october 1, 2021, p. 229. [476] un general assembly, report of the special rapporteur on promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non recurrence, fabián salvioli, transitional justice measures and addressing the legacy of gross violations of human rights and international humanitarian law committed in colonial contexts, a/76/180, july 19, 2021, https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/thematic reports/a76180 promotion truth justice reparation and guarantees non recurrence (accessed november 6, 2024), para. 30. [477] office of the united nations high commissioner for human rights, “protocol additional to the geneva conventions of 12 august 1949, and relating to the protection of victims of international armed conflicts (protocol i), 8 june 1977,” june 8, 1977, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments mechanisms/instruments/protocol additional geneva conventions 12 august 1949 and 0 (accessed may 14, 2024), art. 13(2). [478] prosecutor v krstić (radislav), case no it 98 33 a, appeal judgment, icl 306 (icty 2004), april 19, 2004, https://www.icty.org/x/cases/krstic/acjug/en/ (accessed may 7, 2024). [479] ibid., para. 527. [480] united nations, principles of international law recognized in the charter of the nürnberg tribunal and in the judgment of the tribunal, 1950, https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/7_1_1950.pdf (accessed november 6, 2024). [481] rome statute, art. 7(2)(g). [482] rome statute, art. 7(1)(h). [483] ibid. [484] see icrc, “military necessity,” glossary, undated, https://casebook.icrc.org/node/20549 (accessed november 6, 2024). [485] see icrc, “wanton destruction,” glossary, undated, https://casebook.icrc.org/a_to_z/glossary/wanton destruction (accessed november 6, 2024). mass forced displacement and widespread destruction human rights watch defends the rights of people in close to 100 countries worldwide, spotlighting abuses and bringing perpetrators to justice human rights watch is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit registered in the us under ein: 13 2875808
middle east tensions supported by when a truck carrying three of four rescued hostages broke down and came under fire , israel says it called in an airstrike. scores of palestinians were killed, gazan officials say. by bilal shbair and ronen bergman bilal shbair reported from nuseirat in the gaza strip, and ronen bergman from tel aviv. when the four israelis woke up in gaza on saturday, they had been held hostage by hamas for 245 days. the buildings in which they were being kept, two low rise, concrete apartment blocks, looked much like the other nearby residences in a civilian neighborhood full of palestinian families. within a few hours, the captives, three men and one woman, would be reunited with their own families, the result of a risky, long planned rescue operation in which the full might of the israeli military would be used to devastating effect. “i’m so emotional,” one hostage, noa argamani, 26, told prime minister benjamin netanyahu of israel in a phone call after her release. “it’s been so long since i heard hebrew.” the rescue effort in nuseirat involved hundreds of intelligence officers and two teams of commandos who simultaneously stormed the homes in which the hostages were being held, the israeli military said. in one apartment, where the male hostages were imprisoned, a firefight broke out between the soldiers and the hamas guards, according to the military and video footage it released of the encounter. later, and under a hail of gunfire, the truck in which three hostages and a wounded israeli officer were being evacuated broke down and was surrounded by militants, israeli officials said. in an effort to give the rescuers enough time and ample cover to get the captives to freedom, the military said, the air force began striking dozens of nearby targets. many palestinians became aware of the fighting only when they heard bombs exploding.

 this page is subject to the extended confirmed restriction related to the arab israeli conflict. on 8 june 2024, during an operation to rescue hostages held in the nuseirat refugee camp, the israeli military killed at least 276 people and injured over 698, according to the gaza health ministry and palestinian health officials.[b][12] the operation's objective was to recover hostages taken during the 7 october hamas led attack on israel. the israeli military acknowledged fewer than 100 palestinian deaths.[13][14][15] four israeli captives were rescued noa argamani, shlomi ziv, almog meir jan, and andrey kozlov from two multi story residential apartment buildings in nuseirat.[8] according to the israel defence force, they were held by gazan civilians affiliated with hamas and were guarded by armed hamas militants.[16] during the operation, the israeli military called in an intense air, sea, and ground attack. this resulted in civilian casualties. eu foreign policy chief josep borrell described the events as a "bloodbath.