How a Brooklyn District Tackled School Segregation
District 15 dropped selective admissions for middle schools, and the schools are now more integrated than they were.
NewsletterNew York TodayHow a Brooklyn District Tackled School SegregationDistrict 15 dropped selective admissions for middle schools, and the schools are now more integrated than they were.ByJames BarronToday we’ll find out what happened when a school district in Brooklyn began an ambitious effort to better integrate its middle schools. We’ll also find out about a decision throwing out an attempt by the city to ban foie gras.It’s been five years since District 15 in Brooklyn adopted a plan to better integrate its middle schools, which were then among the most homogenous in the city. I asked Troy Closson, who covers education for the Metro desk, to assess how the plan has worked out.District 15 in Brooklyn dropped selective admissions and began giving every child a lottery number. What happened?Before the pandemic, a handful of districts in New York City were thinking about disparities across schools in their areas and how they could address them through desegregation. In District 15, where that conversation had been going on for several years, parents decided to go further than anywhere else in the city, eliminating selective admissions for middle schools and setting high targets for the proportion of disadvantaged students that each school would enroll.At the time, there was a lot of support in District 15. But there was also concern that when districts try to desegregate, they run the risk that some families will be dissatisfied and that middle-class families in particular will leave the school system.
[{"title": "How a Brooklyn District Tackled School Segregation", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/25/nyregion/brooklyn-district-15-segregation.html#:~:text=District%2015%20dropped%20selective%20admissions,more%20integrated%20than%20they%20were."}, {"title": "How a Brooklyn District Tackled School Segregation", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/25/nyregion/brooklyn-district-15-segregation.html#:~:text=District%2015%20dropped%20selective%20admissions,more%20integrated%20than%20they%20were."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.loc.gov/collections/civil-rights-history-project/articles-and-essays/school-segregation-and-integration/#:~:text=These%20lawsuits%20were%20combined%20into,segregation%20in%20schools%20in%201954."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/brown-v-board-of-education#:~:text=On%20May%2017%2C%201954%2C%20U.S.,amendment%20and%20was%20therefore%20unconstitutional."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/17/us/school-segregation-brown-v-board-dg/index.html#:~:text=While%20enrollment%20of%20non%2DWhite,fewer%20of%20students%20are%20White.&text=De%20facto%20segregation%20persists%20today,abandoned%20efforts%20to%20enforce%20integration."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://teachdemocracy.org/bill-of-rights-in-action/bria-23-2-c-mendez-v-westminster-paving-the-way-to-school-desegregation#:~:text=In%20the%20early%201860s%2C%20California,a%20district%20to%20build%20one."}, {"title": "A Brooklyn school district tackles school segregation", "link": "https://www.economist.com/united-states/2020/01/09/a-brooklyn-school-district-tackles-school-segregation"}, {"title": "How a Brooklyn district tackled school segregation, Hot ...", "link": "https://twitter.com/Brownstoner/status/1805943021394968601"}, {"title": "A Brooklyn middle school integration plan shows some ...", "link": "https://www.chalkbeat.org/newyork/2022/11/14/23453347/nyc-middle-school-admissions-selective-lottery-district-15-diversity-plan-integration/"}, {"title": "A Brooklyn School District Finds a Path Toward Integration", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/25/opinion/brooklyn-school-district-integration.html"}, {"title": "A plan tackling segregated middle schools in Brooklyn shows ...", "link": "https://storytracker.solutionsjournalism.org/stories/a-plan-tackling-segregated-middle-schools-in-brooklyn-shows-some-patterns-are-hard-to-break"}, {"title": "How a Brooklyn District Tackled School Segregation - csibon", "link": "https://csibon.ca/dday/356482/"}, {"title": "Intentional and Inclusive School Mergers - NYC Comptroller", "link": "https://comptroller.nyc.gov/reports/intentional-and-inclusive-school-mergers/"}, {"title": "How Brooklyn is trying to integrate its middle schools", "link": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2019/11/15/what-happened-when-brooklyn-tried-integrate-its-middle-schools/"}, {"title": "New York's School Segregation Crisis: Open the Court Doors ...", "link": "https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2308&context=blr"}]
Tata Group
Kolkata August 15, 2000
How a Bengaluru Tata Group
August 15, 2000 dropped selective admissions for middle schools, and the schools are now more integrated than they were.
Rajiv Mehta
August 15, 2000 we’ll find out what happened when a school district in Bengaluru began an ambitious effort to better integrate its middle schools. We’ll also find out about a decision throwing out an attempt by the city to ban foie Kavita Rao.
It’s been November 14, 2000 since August 15, 2000 in Bengaluru adopted a plan to better integrate its middle schools, which were then among the most homogenous in the city. I asked Kavita Rao, who covers education for the Metro desk, to assess how the plan has worked out.
August 15, 2000 in Bengaluru dropped selective admissions and began giving every child a lottery number. What happened?
Before the pandemic, a handful of districts in Kolkata City were thinking about disparities across schools in their areas and how they could address them through desegregation. In August 15, 2000, where that conversation had been going on for January 26, 2000, parents decided to go further than anywhere else in the city, eliminating selective admissions for middle schools and setting high targets for the proportion of disadvantaged students that each school would enroll.
At the time, there was a lot of support in August 15, 2000. But there was also concern that when districts try to desegregate, they run the risk that some families will be dissatisfied and that middle-class families in particular will leave the school system.
newsletter district 15 dropped selective admissions for middle schools, and the schools are now more integrated than they were. by james barron today we’ll find out what happened when a school district in brooklyn began an ambitious effort to better integrate its middle schools. we’ll also find out about a decision throwing out an attempt by the city to ban foie gras. it’s been five years since district 15 in brooklyn adopted a plan to better integrate its middle schools, which were then among the most homogenous in the city. i asked troy closson, who covers education for the metro desk, to assess how the plan has worked out. district 15 in brooklyn dropped selective admissions and began giving every child a lottery number. what happened? before the pandemic, a handful of districts in new york city were thinking about disparities across schools in their areas and how they could address them through desegregation. in district 15, where that conversation had been going on for several years, parents decided to go further than anywhere else in the city, eliminating selective admissions for middle schools and setting high targets for the proportion of disadvantaged students that each school would enroll. at the time, there was a lot of support in district 15. but there was also concern that when districts try to desegregate, they run the risk that some families will be dissatisfied and that middle class families in particular will leave the school system.

supported by a new report found that many schools enrolled more racially and socioeconomically diverse groups of students without sparking a major exodus of families from public schools. by troy closson seeking to solve a problem that has vexed public schools around the country for decades, one progressive section of new york undertook an ambitious plan to better integrate middle schools that were among the most homogenous in the city. selective admissions were scrapped. every child got a lottery number instead. schools adopted targets to admit certain numbers of disadvantaged children. and unlike in many places where integration attempts faced fierce opposition, parents led the effort. now, five years later, the plan appears to be working. middle schools in a section of northwest brooklyn that stretches from sunset park to cobble hill went from being the second most socioeconomically segregated to 19th out of the city’s 32 local districts. teachers and students say friendships are emerging across income lines. and while opposition to integration efforts is often focused on concern that middle class and white families will abandon public schools, the area   district 15   has not seen a major exodus. the city’s public school enrollment has dropped as families leave new york or move to charters, but the district’s declines have been less extreme than elsewhere. across american public schools, more than a third of all students attend a school where most of their peers share the same race or ethnicity. but the supreme court has also limited how schools can use race to sort students among schools, and efforts to address racial segregation have mostly stalled. instead of using race, the district employed other categories to diversify student bodies and bring students with different life experiences and resources together. specifically, schools prioritized students who are homeless, learning english or from low income families   factors that are often correlated to race but that do not pose the same legal challenges.

https://www.shibleydaycamp.com/ https://brooklynpreschoolofscience.com/ new_slide2 new_slide1 new_slide3 new_slide4 a few years ago, district 15 undertook an ambitious plan to better integrate their middle schools that were among the most segregated in the city. in 2018, selective admissions (grades, standardized test results, attendance etc) were discontinued and every child got a lottery number instead. schools adopted targets to admit certain numbers of disadvantaged children (priority in admissions) and parents led the effort. 5 years after its implementation, the plan is working! middle schools in district 15 from sunset park to cobble hill went from being the second most socioeconomically segregated #30 to #19 of the city’s 32 local districts. teachers and students say friendships are emerging across income lines. and while opposition to integration efforts is often focused concern that middle class and white families will abandon public schools, the area   district 15   has not seen a major exodus. the city’s public school enrollment has dropped as families leave new york or move to charters, but the district’s declines have been less extreme than elsewhere. read the full report here. © 2023 brooklyn bridge parents

tensions are rising ahead of an anticipated announcement about whether new york city middle and high schools will fully bring back selective admissions for the first time since the pandemic. removing test scores, attendance, and other “screens” from the selection process helped move the needle on desegregating the nation’s largest public school system, integration advocates said. but families who support selective admissions thought the changes   sparked by pandemic related learning disruptions   unfairly cost their children their top school choices. schools chancellor david banks is expected to unveil selection criteria next week, an education department spokesperson said, offering no other details. the adams administration has not highlighted school integration as a priority. instead, the mayor has embraced screened programs that have long been segregated by race, class, and academic performance: he expanded “gifted and talented” programs and signaled a desire to open more specialized high schools. families across the five boroughs are already mounting letter writing campaigns and petitions for and against schools that use screens in sorting the city’s 10  and 13 year olds into sixth and ninth grade. some parent councils are calling for the removal of selective admissions, while others are calling for the opposite. “we expect nothing less than the permanent elimination of middle school screens,” said nyah berg, executive director of new york appleseed, which advocates for removing screened admissions at middle and high schools. “it was unjustifiable before the pandemic, and it’s just as unjustifiable now to measure a child as young as 9 years old’s educational attainment, and to judge them by that for access to public middle school.” place nyc, a group that has pushed to preserve strict admissions screens to public middle and high schools, is circulating a petition that calls for removing lottery admissions, arguing that “academically advanced students need programs that meet their needs.” black and latino students, as well as those from low income families, with disabilities, or who are learning english as a new language are less likely to meet admissions requirements for selective schools, leaving such schools unrepresentative of the school system as a whole. research has found that diverse schools can lead to a slew of academic and social benefits for students, including better test scores, an increased likelihood of attending college, boosting leadership skills and confidence, and combating racial bias or stereotypes, according to the century foundation. for this year’s incoming sixth graders, city officials paused screens for the second year in a row, instead admitting students through a lottery system. after the city removed middle school screens the year before, its 50 most selective school programs offered an average of 48% of its seats to students from low income families, up from 41% the previous year, according to education department data. the department has not shared demographic information on offer data for this school year. three quarters of middle school applicants this year received offers to their first choice, an increase of four percentage points from 2021, according to department data. ninety one percent landed a spot in one of their top three choices, up three percentage points from 2021. about a quarter of the city’s 400 high schools use screens to admit students. ahead of this year, the city centralized the admissions process and eliminated the use of attendance and state test scores, but still allowed some selective schools to keep their own screens, including their own admissions exams, interviews, and essays. (admissions to the city’s specialized high schools remained separate and unchanged.) about half of roughly 74,000 high school applicants got their first choice, up four percentage points from the previous year. three quarters of all applicants were placed at one of their top three choices, up two percentage points from the previous year. the department didn’t release data for all high schools, but highlighted notable demographic shifts at some of the city’s most coveted high schools. nearly a quarter of admissions at townsend harris high school went to black and latino students, up from 16% the previous year. and at millennium brooklyn high school, black and latino students received 43% of offers, an increase of 23 percentage points. (those schools participate in the city’s diversity in admissions program, which allows them to give preference to underrepresented students.) brooklyn’s district 15   which encompasses wealthy neighborhoods like cobble hill and carroll gardens along with working class ones such as sunset park and red hook   is often viewed as a test case for dropping middle school screens. for the past four years its diversity plan admitted students to middle schools through a lottery system, prioritizing 52% of seats for low income students, those living in temporary housing, and english learners. in the plan’s first year, black and latino enrollment jumped at some schools that were largely white, while white enrollment increased, albeit at smaller rates, at overwhelmingly black and latino schools. the local parent council, in partnership with new york appleseed, drafted a resolution calling to permanently remove middle school screens. the resolution also calls for the city to keep recent changes to high school admissions instead of introducing more stringent requirements or changes. (nathaniel styer, an education department spokesperson, said officials are not considering dismantling district 15’s diversity plan.) a discussion on tuesday about district 15’s resolution laid bare some of the historic arguments for and against screened admissions that will likely surface when the city announces its plans. most people spoke in support of the district’s diversity plan and unscreened schools, recounting tales of stressed children who felt pressured as early as first grade to maintain perfect attendance to get into the middle school of their choice. one parent noted that her child, who was part of the inaugural sixth grade class chosen by lottery, attended a more racially diverse middle school than elementary school. her daughter grew “academically, socially, emotionally,” and even became involved with a youth integration advocacy group. “families are much more relaxed and confident about the process once we explain how it works, how the lottery works, what their options are,” amy sumner, parent coordinator at the brooklyn new school, said at the district 15 parent council meeting. “it’s removed so much of the tension and anxiety that the families go through every year.” in arguing for screens, parent council member vincent lu argued that enrollment “dropped tremendously” in district 15 because of admissions changes. “families vote with their feet,” lu said. however, district 15’s enrollment changes are similar to citywide trends. district 15’s enrollment last year in traditional public schools was about 88% of its pre pandemic numbers. that’s in line with the citywide average of 89%, according to data from the independent budget office. (the data excludes preschool for 3 year olds or alternative programs, such as programs for overage and under credited students). as enrollment has dropped in public schools across the nation, there is little evidence showing that admissions changes pushed families to leave district schools. since the onset of the pandemic, the largest enrollment declines across the city have not been in middle or high school grades, but rather in prekindergarten for 4 year olds, followed by second grade, kindergarten and third grade. but other districts, such as brooklyn’s district 20 and manhattan’s district 2, are also citing enrollment in their resolutions in support of reinstating screened admissions, based on what they’ve heard from families. manhattan’s affluent district 2, in fact, has about 91% of its pre pandemic enrollment, while that figure is 90% for district 20, according to ibo data, both slightly higher than the citywide average. that district’s parent council has not yet met to discuss the resolution. “d2 students face these unequitable and demoralizing admissions results despite demonstrating excellent academic proficiency via grades and state test scores that consistently outperform state wide,” the resolution said. though middle and high school applications were delayed the past few years, previously they were due in december. reema amin is a reporter covering new york city schools with a focus on state policy and english language learners. contact reema at ramin@chalkbeat.org. the bills would block undocumented children from attending public schools, or require schools to collect data about students’ citizenship status. the jan. 13 memo allows city workers to let federal agents into public buildings without a warrant signed from a judge if they feel “reasonably threatened” for their own safety or that of others. lawmakers have until feb. 20 to pass bills through their chambers of origin. new york city this year launched a network of disability pride clubs. of the 90 schools that have such clubs, stuyvesant high school’s is the largest. denver’s school boundaries have not been systematically reviewed in decades. the amendment would pause any future school closures until closures that are underway are executed, which the superintendent said could take 2 years. thousands of new yorkers are getting a 3 minute rundown of the city's big education stories and statewide policy changes every weekday morning. sign up for chalkbeat new york's free newsletter to join them today. by signing up, you agree to our privacy notice and european users agree to the data transfer policy. you may also receive occasional messages from sponsors. become a chalkbeat sponsor chalkbeat is a civic news company newsroom ©2025

national school choice week matt welch | 1.25.2023 3:22 pm when then mayor bill de blasio and the entire new york city political and educational establishment unveiled in september 2018 a trailblazing new middle school diversity plan that radically changed the admissions criteria for brooklyn's district 15 in the name of racial "equity," they chose the most symbolic possible site for the announcement: m.s. 51, the william alexander school, in progressive (and prosperous) park slope. m.s. 51, which until that moment had screened prospective incoming students for their elementary level grades, test scores, and attendance, was by far the most sought after middle school in a district where enrollment was always increasing, and students were routinely moving on to the city's eight elite high schools. william alexander, where both de blasio and then city councilman (now comptroller) brad lander had already graduated their kids, was nyc's fourth largest feeder into the specialized high schools in 2018 with 122; a raw number it would match again in 2019, the last class before the new admissions rules went into effect. "the current d15 admissions process presents itself as a system of choice and meritocracy, but it functions as a system for hoarding privilege," lander said at m.s. 51 that day. "i genuinely believe that this plan will be better for all students, and that a less segregated, less divided city will be better for all of us." the claim that all students would benefit from a "controlled choice" system in which families rank their preferred middle school destinations but the education bureaucracy ultimately controls the outcome via algorithmic lottery weighted to smooth out socioeconomic imbalances across the district was not just presented as an aspirational prediction by advocates, but as scientific fact by politicians and allegedly impartial news organizations. "the research is clear integrated schools benefit all students," then new york school chancellor richard carranza said that day. asserted the city's lengthy and triumphant press release: "the research is clear that all students benefit from diverse, inclusive schools….[t]here is widespread agreement that there are positive academic outcomes for all students attending racially diverse schools." echoed new york times national education correspondent dana goldstein: "there's a robust and growing body of research that pretty conclusively demonstrates the benefits of integration." suppose there is a gap between those confident, science touting predictions and the real world controlled choice experiences of students, parents, and schools. in that case, the implications go far beyond the fate of a few thousand brooklyn families. district 15's removal of selective admissions criteria (enacted at the same time as nyc's district 3) became the temporary citywide standard in the pandemic marred admissions years of 2020 and 2021 and is now the policy in most of the city. an estimated 185 public k 12 districts around the country have adopted policies to combat "segregation" (using the 21st century activist sense of that word, not the 1950s definition of government enforced racial bans) as the tenets of diversity, equity, and inclusion (dei) spread like wildfire through public education institutions, particularly in democratic controlled polities. thanks to parents badgering new york's department of education (doe) with freedom of information law (foil) requests, we know as of last week how the first post diversity plan three year class of district 15 middle schoolers fared when applying to elite high schools: not so great. the middle school class of 2019, the last to graduate under the old admissions policy, had 212 offers into the specialized high schools. the class of 2022 received just 168; this despite being only 22 students smaller than the class of 2019. pre diversity plan, around 45 percent of district 15 8th graders took the specialized highschool aptitude test (shsat), of which around 25 percent got in; post changes, those ratios have been consistently down to 40 percent and 21 percent, respectively. but the results were downright brutal in de blasio's old m.s. 51. after sending 122 kids to the elite schools in both 2018 and 2019, william alexander has nose dived down to 52. once among the top four feeder schools in the city, m.s. 51 is now tied for 16th. and it's not just the smart kids suffering. seventh grade math proficiency scores at the school have collapsed from 81 percent in 2019 to 48 percent in 2022, with double digit declines among each of the four racial groups that the doe tracks. this cannot be explained away by pandemic learning loss; manhattan's district 2, which is consistently the second largest feeder into the specialized high school, saw very little decline over the same period. it gets considerably worse. one of the main metrics new york city families look at when ranking their preferred middle and high schools is students' feeling of safety around school and in class. gotham, after all, can be a bit rough around the edges, and a sense of dangerous chaos does not generally speak well of institutions harboring children. in just three short years, students' self reported feeling of safety around m.s. 51 has plummeted 19 percentage points, from 91 percent to 72 percent. even safety within the classroom has notched down from 95 percent to 90 percent. this tracks with all the anecdotal chatter i've heard (i live a mile away) among friends whose kids have attended m.s. 51 during the diversity plan era: bedlam in the hallways, serial transgressors going unpunished by the new "restorative justice" discipline policies, woeful integration of new incoming populations, a bewildering decline in academics. a report tuesday in chalkbeat new york, which has published a lot of uncritical praise of the diversity plan until this week, paints a picture of profound dysfunction at william alexander two thirds of faculty giving a no confidence vote to new principal neal singh; their union filing a grievance, teachers quitting in droves, accusations (on all sides) of racism, anguished quotes from people whose whole identity was wrapped up in what had been until 2019 a beloved local institution. "teachers and parents reported that fights were erupting outside the building and in the hallways," chalkbeat found. "children were also cutting class, vaping and smoking pot in the bathrooms, pulling fire alarms, and bullying other students, the teachers and parents said. the school issued 33 suspensions last year, according to public data. that was up from 19 in 2018 2019." new york city's government run public schools have seen a staggering 10 percent enrollment decline since the pandemic, including another 1.8 percent drop this school year. still, the exodus from district 15 middle schools began the year before covid 19, coinciding precisely when the diversity plan went into effect and delivered a sharp increase in families unhappy with their controlled choice school designation. and now, despite much lip service from new york mayor eric adams and his doe chief david banks about luring families back into the public system by restoring merit based policies, the removal of admissions criteria is spreading across the city under their watch. including in the once impervious district 2. despite the local community education council (cec) voting to restore admissions screens and parents at public meetings overwhelmingly lending their support, district 2 superintendent kelly mcguire moved unilaterally in october to subject all 17 middle schools to a weighted lottery system similar to district 15's. "i am now looking for private schools for my son," district 2 cec member danyela souza egorov told mcguire at a november meeting. "but so many families in our district have reached out to me that they cannot afford it. it's deeply unfair that your plan does not meet the needs of these families." back when district 15 was holding a series of public meetings that would eventually lead to its admissions overhaul, i heard concerned parents including many who supported the plan ask reform advocates on several occasions versions of two questions: 1) how will you ensure that the re mixed schools will be able to integrate new populations that have more varied education backgrounds/needs, and 2) what will you try to do to retain families that are unhappy with their school designations? the answer to both, over and over again, was: stop being racist. now that those parental worries about degraded quality and familial flight have indeed come to pass, as had been predicted by many academics who study controlled choice, it remains to be seen whether the local and national momentum toward k 12 educational "equity" policies will be slowed. the funding for most public schooling is tied to enrollment, and enrollment is falling fastest in places that locked down, imposed controlled choice, or both. there is not an unlimited amount of public support available for the expensive provision of a free product that consumers find repellant. δdocument.getelementbyid( "ak_js_1" ).setattribute( "value", ( new date() ).gettime() ); next: no matter the 'details on these shootings,' biden says, congress should respond by banning 'assault weapons' matt welch is an editor at large at reason. show comments (18) ryan bourne and marcos falcone | from the march 2025 issue reason staff | from the march 2025 issue jacob sullum | 2.7.2025 2:45 pm emma camp | 2.7.2025 2:09 pm joe lancaster | 2.7.2025 12:15 pm © 2024 reason foundation | accessibility | privacy policy | terms of use this site is protected by recaptcha and the google privacy policy and terms of service apply. do you care about free minds and free markets? sign up to get the biggest stories from reason in your inbox every afternoon. δdocument.getelementbyid( "ak_js_2" ).setattribute( "value", ( new date() ).gettime() ); this modal will close in 10 just $25 per year

connect with ustwitterfacebook (photo: michael appleton/mayor's office) earlier this week, the school diversity advisory group (sdag) released its second and final set of recommendations to integrate city schools, a significant development in the current chapter of the city’s response to deep racial and economic segregation in its school system, which is the largest in the country and home to 1.1 million students. this chapter began in 2014, 60 years after brown v. board of education and bill de blasio’s first year as mayor, when a report published by the ucla civil rights project showed that new york’s was one of the least integrated school systems in the country    the worst state in terms of white black segregation and among the bottom three for latino white segregation. much of that segregation was due to the facts on the ground in the country’s largest city. de blasio and his administration have been forced to acknowledge that dismal reality in the years since, at first looking to largely sidestep the issue, then beginning with modest proposals to improve diversity in schools and ultimately creating the sdag at the end of 2017. the administration’s focus on school segregation did not happen immediately following the march 2014 ucla report, released just three months into de blasio’s tenure as mayor, and not without pressure from grassroots advocates, students, families, and local elected officials at various stages during the last five years. the sdag’s two sets of recommendations, some of which are especially controversial, on top of de blasio’s previous proposal to take aggressive measures to integrate the city’s eight prestigious specialized high schools, have set off something of a firestorm. they set the stage for challenging decisions that de blasio will soon make about which recommendations to pursue, including, perhaps, a sweeping overhaul of the city’s “gifted and talented” programs and selective admissions to middle schools. following will likely be years more of debate about how to desegregate city schools while also improving the quality of education hundreds of thousands of students receive. before the next chapter begins, how did we get here? 2012 2013some would say the recent history of new york city’s school desegregation debate begins, before the 2014 ucla report, with a districting proposal that illustrated the complex factors the city would later need to address. in the fall of 2012, the district 15 community education council approved a school district rezoning proposed by the department of education (doe) under mayor michael bloomberg that would shrink the geographic districts of two popular but overcrowded schools in park slope, brooklyn, and open a new school to serve some of the students who would be cut out. at the same time, the doe was rebuilding a predominantly african american 300 seat school in neighboring community school district 13. for a period of time, both the district 13 and district 15 schools were housed in the same building. “that sounded sensible, except what they were really saying was, ‘we’re gonna build a building with two doors; into one door will go 300 black kids, and to the other door will go 600 mostly white kids,” said brad lander, a city council member representing parts of both school districts, in an interview with gotham gazette. “that was enough for people to wake up in this district and say, ‘that is insane. we will not allow that level of school segregation,’” recalled lander, who succeeded then public advocate bill de blasio in the city council. after a prolonged battle with the bloomberg administration, local elected officials, parents, and advocates, the doe agreed to create a single 900 seat school    p.s. 133    open to students from both districts with a model for inclusive admissions, becoming the first school with enrollment set asides to increase diversity, according to lander. 2014 2015in 2014, six decades after the u.s. supreme court ruled racial segregation in schools unconstitutional, the ucla civil rights project published its report, with research led by dr. john kucsera and dr. gary orfield, which stated new york state had “the most segregated schools in the country,” largely due to inequality in the city’s school system. the report found roughly 66 percent of black students and 57 percent of latino students attended schools where less than 10 percent of students were white. some of the worst segregation was in the bronx, where not a single school’s student body was more than 10 percent white. “for new york to have a favorable multiracial future both socially and economically, it is absolutely urgent that its leaders and citizens understand both the values of diversity and the harms of inequality,” the report reads. when asked about the report and the city’s segregated schools, de blasio initially and for years mostly had a three pronged answer: one, that school segregation is the result of hundreds of years of history and broader “structural racism” in society; two, that his education programming was focused on improving all schools and thus helping foster integration and reduce the need for desegregation; and three, that if local communities wanted to pursue solutions to desegregate nearby schools, they had his blessing. he also noted on multiple occasions that families make major decisions and investments based on schools, and indicated he needed to be cautious about more drastic measures that might alter school zoning, enrollment or admissions policies. and, the mayor repeatedly mentioned that in part because of housing segregation, there are many geographic areas of the city home to residents of limited diversity, making local school integration especially challenging without a choice he was not willing to pursue: the new york city equivalent of busing students to achieve integrated schools. “the reason we have segregation in our society is about structural racism, is about 400 years of american history and a lot of things that should have been done differently in american history,” de blasio said later, in 2018. “it’s about economics first and foremost and the fact that economic opportunity is still not open and consistent across different racial groups and ethnic groups and that’s the first problem. that leads to housing segregation and that in turn leads to a situation where our classrooms are not diverse.” in november 2014, prompted by the ucla report and the 60th anniversary of the landmark brown decision, the city council held its first public hearing on school segregation in decades, and led to the passage in 2015 of three pieces of legislation sponsored by council members inez barron, brad lander, and ritchie torres, known as the school diversity accountability act. the ucla report and the anniversary year “presented an occasion to renew our city and our country’s commitment to desegregation,” torres, who represents parts of the bronx, said in an interview. “the fact is that we have the most segregated school system in the country. we have a school system more segregated than the vestiges of jim crow in the south.” the package required the doe to report annually on demographic data that could be used to evaluate segregation and diversity, and report on what steps the doe is taking to address those issues. the city council cannot mandate the doe adopt specific policies, so torres sponsored a resolution in the package calling on doe to develop a plan to combat school segregation. “in some ways that call is what sdag is now, many years later, answering,” said lander. “this is a step further in our efforts to ensure that our schools are as diverse as our city and people of all communities live, learn, work together,” de blasio said in june 2015 when signing the legislative package. in 2014 and 2015, grassroots advocates, parents, and educators in community school districts 1, 3, 13, and 15 became more active organizing around school by school, as well as district level, integration plans. some of the most vocal desegregation activists, like those in integratenyc, a student led advocacy group, formed during this period. they “saw a historic opportunity to renew the campaign to desegregate our school system. it was driven not primarily by elected officials but by grassroots activists, especially students,” torres recalled. activism, panel discussions, and other conversation around school desegregation continued. in 2015, the doe took its first steps toward establishing the diversity in admissions pilot program, a school by school approach modeled on the types of inclusive admissions policies p.s. 133 was employing. the city designated seven schools to participate in the program that year, according to lander, “and since we have 1,700, that was pretty modest...it was the first official step of them doing anything [but] it was not yet a serious effort to confront segregation across the school system.” “we were able to create admissions policies that promote diversity and respect the needs of the community. i’m hopeful that these changes will help serve as a model for schools across the city,” said then schools chancellor carmen fariña in a press release, without explicitly mentioning the issue of segregation. when gotham gazette asked the mayor in november 2015 why he wasn’t taking more aggressive measures to integrate city schools, de blasio’s response made waves. “you have to also respect families who have made a decision to live in a certain area oftentimes because of a specific school,” de blasio said. by this point, the advocacy around the issue was well underway and gaining steam, and the doe was submitting its first reports required under the school diversity accountability act. 2016in 2016, much of the public attention and advocacy was focused on district level plans, where changes could be made on a small scale and tested, especially in areas that resemble a microcosm of the city’s school demographics. questions still hovered around whether de blasio, who ran for mayor on a progressive platform focused on equity    including bridging racial, educational, and socioeconomic gaps    would make the issue a priority. (school segregation was not a high profile issue during the 2013 election, and his campaign did not address it other than de blasio calling for greater diversity at the city’s eight specialized high schools.) a “controlled choice” admissions policy    in which parent/student school choices are balanced with goals of socioeconomic integration    was proposed in district 1 in the lower east side. (in october 2017, district 1 became the first district to push for and win a district wide model for school integration.) asked about pursuing greater desegregation measures and specifically a broader controlled choice admissions policy during a june 2016 appearance on wnyc’s the brian lehrer show, de blasio demurred. “we believe there is a lot more to be done in terms of fully integrating our schools, but i do want to say, right now we are seeing some real success with models that are being used right now in our school system that are starting to be very, very effective in terms of bringing in a better mix of kids into some of our schools. i think the pre k program has also been an example of an initiative that has had a really good impact in terms of diversity. so, we’re looking at a lot of options. i’m committed to it.” pushed a bit further, de blasio said, “there’s different models that we have some real hope in. but let’s be clear...this is also the result of decades, in fact hundreds of years, of segregation in our nation. and a lot of that goes back to economics and housing. our affordable housing plan, also, we believe, creates more diversity in neighborhoods, and that’s really, obviously, the root of the situation. if we can create more diversity through housing and development, that is another way to get at the schools issue.” in september 2016, de blasio was asked by a reporter about pushing more desegregation measures, and said, in part: “[w]e’ve already foreshadowed we’re going to have a bigger vision that we’ll put forward about how we can do diversification work for our schools   something we believe in. but we also want to be clear about the limits of it, and i’m going to be very explicit about this as we present that vision. the problem is not an education problem, the problem is an american history problem. it’s the problem of structural racism. it’s a problem of housing segregation.” he continued: “let’s not ask the schools to address all those problems simultaneously   that’s not viable. but there’s ways that we can do better through our schools. and, i certainly think if you talk to parents about pre k and what it’s done for their kids, it’s been a success. so, we have to   the first mission is always to make the education system work for the kids to achieve onto itself equity and excellence. and it’s crucial distinction   if we want a more just city and a more just nation, then let’s get our school system to live up to a notion of equity and excellence. separately, we have to do a lot in our society writ large to create more diversity and more opportunity across the board.” 2017 2018one indication from de blasio that he would pursue a broader integration plan came with the launch of equity and excellence for all in june 2017, which led to the school diversity advisory group (sdag) that would explore solutions for city wide desegregation, according to council member lander. the vision’s main focus, however, was expanding course options and resources in underserved (and heavily segregated) schools and districts. the program included initiatives like “algebra for all” and “ap for all” and other planks of a platform de blasio said would help improve learning opportunities for students wherever they may attend a city school. the framework also provided for the doe to support school districts in developing diversity plans to achieve greater integration, without ever making explicit mention of segregation, according to lander. all the while, de blasio maintained that through his universal pre kindergarten initiative, renewal school turnaround program, and equity and excellence initiatives, he was ensuring there would be “no bad schools,” which would make racial segregation less of a concern and improve the chances of integrated schools. during a june 2017 appearance on wnyc’s the brian lehrer show, de blasio defended himself against the notion that he was not being bold enough on school desegregation. he said, in part, “here’s what troubles me when people put the question of diversification ahead of the question of immediate efforts, toward better schools and more equal schools. we’ve got kids right now    a generation of children right now who need our help. by doing things like pre k for all, advanced placement courses in all high schools, including ones that never had any   getting kids on grade level reading by third grade. these are things that got ignored for many, many years...and so, bluntly, inequality grew and grew and grew. i have the tools right now to start addressing this, with the geographical realities and demographic realities we face. that is how we address equity right now while building towards a more diverse and integrated society. but, we’ve got to help kids now.” in fall 2018, district 15 in park slope, where lander, council member carlos menchaca, and parents for middle school equity had been working to change screening policy in middle school admissions, became one of the first districts to be approved and receive funding for integration planning. “we eliminated screening in the district 15 middle schools. in some ways that is the proposal sdag is making, to take that to a broader level,” lander told gotham gazette, referring to the recommendations released this week that call for sweeping changes to admissions processes and investments in new enrichment programming. the sdag, a group of civil rights activists, students, parents, educators, and other experts appointed by the mayor as he sought reelection, held its first meeting on december 11, 2017. the same month, new york city schools chancellor carmen fariña announced she was stepping down from the post. at the december 22, 2017 press conference announcing fariña’s retirement, gotham gazette asked her if she regretted not taking on school desegregation more aggressively. “no,” she said, “i think we’ve done some really good work. there’s always more than can be done on any initiative, but i’m going back to what i said before   you could mandate some things, but having a lot more conversations with people, which is what we’ve been doing...and i think convincing people to come to the table to want to do the right thing for the right reasons is a lot more important, and i think that’s what we’ve been doing.” she continued; “i certainly feel that our new diversity committee that we just put in place   they just met, i think, last week   has gotten some great suggestions because this is not just us coming with ideas, but what does the community think?” after a few other thoughts, she concluded: “so you can always do things better. i agree with the mayor that in our equity and excellence the next chancellor should be thinking about going deeper and deeper, but i think we’re on the right path.” 2018in march 2018, miami dade county superintendent alberto carvalho very publicly announced he would not become the new schools chancellor a day after accepting the job. that week mayor de blasio hired richard carranza, a superintendent in houston and san francisco schools, to be the next schools chancellor. “the equity agenda championed by our mayor is my equity agenda,” carranza said at the city hall press conference announcing he would be taking the position. within a month, carranza was discussing school desegregation explicitly, breaking from de blasio’s and fariña’s practice of avoiding the term in favor of the far less defined and loaded concept of “diversity.” “without that [shift] we would not be anywhere close to where we are. he has been much more enthusiastic about this issue than the mayor,” lander said, responding to a recent new york times article that describes carranza in his second year as trying to “reset expectations” about the prospect of integration. in june 2018, two months after carranza started, he and the mayor announced a proposal to improve diversity at the city’s selective specialized high schools, where enrollment of black and hispanic students has declined precipitously in the last four decades. the plan included scrapping over three years the specialized high school admissions test (shsat), which is seen as a critical factor in the predominant enrollment of white and asian students. the fate of the shsat for the three most prestigious of the eight specialized schools is controlled by the state, not the city, and many saw it as a way for de blasio to take up the issue of school segregation without implicating his administration’s own responsibility in addressing it. that plan faced severe backlash from many parents and students who were eager to keep the rules the same, and was criticized for not having enough community input. it did not advance in albany in 2018. 2019a year later, the shsat is still the single admissions test for enrollment in eight of the city’s nine specialized high schools (the ninth is a performing arts school). in march, it was reported that only 7 out of 895 seats in stuyvesant high school’s next freshman class would go to black students. later that month, as he was considering a presidential run on a progressive platform, de blasio used the word “segregation” to describe new york’s school system for the first time, according to chalkbeat. discussing specialized high schools during an appearance on wnyc radio, de blasio told host brian lehrer, “we’re saying we’re not going to live by this old system that has perpetuated massive segregation, not just segregation   massive segregation.” meanwhile, in february, the school diversity advisory group released its first of two sets of recommendations for the city to improve school integration. the recommendations include adding metrics on diversity and integration to mandated reporting, creating a “general assembly” of high school reps to assist in crafting a citywide agenda, and monitoring discrepancies in school discipline. other suggestions dealt with improving culturally relevant education and engaging communities through local partnerships. “although we applaud sdag’s reference to more ambitious short, medium and long term integration goals by requiring district, borough and then city wide integration plans, these will only be effective if the city develops powerful metrics for defining integration,” wrote the alliance for school integration and desegregation, a coalition of recently formed and longstanding civil rights groups, in a statement following the report. asked about taking on segregated schools during a february 26 press conference on the “record high” number of city students taking advanced placement course, de blasio said, “[t]here is a much bigger discussion that we will have in this city and we’ve put forward some pieces of it, and there is a lot more to come, on how to make sure our children learn with each other and how to have the most diverse classrooms that we can have. but that should not be mistaken for the primary way or the only way to ensure that kids get a great education. we have kids in every kind of community who are ready to achieve their potential. they need investment. they need high quality teachers. they need the best possible principals. this is the path forward, first and foremost, that’s what equity and excellences is all about.” in june, de blasio announced the city would be adopting 62 of the initial 67 recommendations. at the time, the report was criticized for not dealing with gifted and talented programs for elementary school children and selective admissions screenings for higher grades, which are seen as among the greatest barriers to integration. “i wish the focus could largely be kept on reforming admissions. for me enrollment policy is, beyond housing, the root cause of a heavily segregated school system,” council member torres told gotham gazette, saying the administration’s preoccupation with specialized high schools diverts attention and political capital from more fundamental issues. on tuesday, sdag released its second and final report, which among other things recommended the city eliminate its gifted and talented elementary school programs and admissions screenings for middle schools, while adding new enrichment programs to all schools that need them to serve all learners. the new recommendations fell short of proposing admissions policy for high schools be changed, even as they called for other selective admissions practices to be reformed, instead suggesting study down the line after other changes are adopted. now it is up to carranza, and ultimately the mayor, to act on the group’s recommendations. at a press conference tuesday, carranza indicated he was eager to review the report, and de blasio also said he would review it but made no commitment to acting on the recommendations. sdag has left the ball in the mayor’s court. “we have decided not to be very prescriptive in terms of the recommendations, in part in recognition that new york city is so large, districts differ greatly in terms of their demographics and their needs,” said amy hsin, a sociologist at queens college and a member of the sdag executive committee, in an interview with gotham gazette. “so we feel that the doe needs to work with communities to co develop an integration plan where communities are stakeholders,” she added. “that’s what we are trying to push the city to do in our reports.” how de blasio responds will pose a major test in the final years of his mayoralty, and may significantly shape public discourse during the upcoming race to replace him. *** by ethan geringer sameth, reporter, gotham gazette @geringersameth @gothamgazette read more by this writer. ben max contributed to this story. gotham gazette is published by citizens union foundation and is made possible by support from the robert sterling clark foundation, the john s. and james l. knight foundation, the altman foundation,the fund for the city of new york and donors to citizens union foundation. please consider supporting citizens union foundation's public education programs. critical early support to gotham gazette was provided by the charles h. revson foundation, rockefeller brothers fund and the alfred p. sloan foundation. © 2025 citizens union foundation 501(c)3, all rights reserved | citizens union foundation privacy policy

education new york city schools chancellor richard carranza at a media availability on december 21. michael appleton/mayoral photography office get it in your inbox. by rebecca c. lewis earlier this year, new york city schools chancellor richard carranza, who has made diversity at city schools a top priority, caught flack for saying “never waste a good crisis” regarding making big changes to the city’s school system. but it seems that mayor bill de blasio listened. de blasio announced on friday a monumental shift in how many city public middle schools and high schools accept students. he said that he would drop screening criteria for selective middle schools for the upcoming school year and eliminate geographic preference for admission at high schools. that change is meant to increase diversity at the city’s top public schools and help to desegregate one of the most segregated school systems in the entire country. advocates for increasing diversity in schools have been calling for such changes for years, including carranza, who has vocally opposed screened schools. de blasio finally took action in response to the disruptions that the covid 19 pandemic caused to schooling and testing. but they may have far reaching implications well beyond the pandemic. here’s what you need to know about the changes. about 200 middle schools   40% of all public middle schools in the city   accept students through a screening process, based on a variety of criteria including grades, standardized test scores, student interviews and attendance. they tend to be the highest performing schools and often located in whiter, wealthier neighborhoods. black, latino and low income students also tend to be very underrepresented at these schools. under the shift, these schools will not be allowed to screen students. instead they will select students through a lottery system, the same as other non screened schools. students will rank their top schools on their middle school applications as they always have, including traditionally screened schools. high schools screening processes will remain in place, although schools chancellor richard carranza encouraged screened high schools to consider voluntarily dropping the screens. about 250 high schools will also no longer give geographic admissions preference to students. preference by district will get eliminated for the upcoming school year, with preference for borough residents going the next year. these schools would treat admissions the same as all other public high schools in the city, which are open to all students regardless of where they’re from and have no geographic preference. manhattan’s district 2, encompassing affluent neighborhoods like the upper west side and tribeca, is one of the most egregious examples of this special carve out. it has some of the best and most selective public high schools in the city, and six of those high schools give priority to students living in the district. that means that high performing students of color from other neighborhoods are less likely to get in, even if they meet the screening criteria. middle schools that offer district priority in admissions will be allowed to continue to offer that. the elimination of screens for middles schools has only been announced for one year with the understanding that the pandemic interfered with standardized tests that are often used in admission criteria, and the fact that the city did away with the traditional grading system to accommodate students who may be struggling during the pandemic or falling behind due to the massive upheavals in schooling. the de blasio administration will evaluate the admissions process for the 2021 2022 school year, and there’s no guarantee that screenings will be eliminated for the 2022 2023 school year. the elimination of district preference for high schools, however, is permanent. the announcement came the same week that principals at manhattan’s district 2 high schools called on the city to diversify the district by doing away with the geographic prioritization that keeps some of the city’s best public schools disproportionately white. admissions at the city’s nine specialized high schools will remain unchanged. students will still need to take the specialized high school admissions test, which is still the sole determinant of if students are accepted, for eight of the schools and follow the performance or portfolio submission process for laguardia high school. the criteria for these schools, despite being new york city public schools, are set by the state, so only the state legislature can implement any changes. however, the changes to admissions criteria that de blasio enacted affect far more schools, some of which are even less representative of the city’s population than the specialized high schools, or more skewed towards the wealthy, as the specialized high schools have large percentages of low income asian american students, who are not well represented in many other screened schools. in 2018, district 15 in brooklyn changed its admissions process for middle schools, eliminating the screening process and shifting to a lottery system that gave extra weight to students who are low income and homeless students, as well as those learning english as a second language. the goal of the change was to decrease segregation within the district itself, which includes affluent enclaves like park slope and carroll gardens as well as working class and mostly immigrant communities like sunset park and red hook. within a year, the diversity plan was already showing results, with the whitest and richest schools in the district showing some of the most dramatic shifts in enrollment. de blasio’s new announcement expands what that one district did to the entire school system for at least one year, although without the extra weight for underserved students in the lottery system. any middle schools that already have diversity plans in place to help prioritize underserved students for admissions at middle schools, like district 1 on the lower east side and district 3 on the upper west side, will keep those plans in place. de blasio has long been criticized for slow walking action on integrating the city’s school system. when in 2018 he first called for the elimination of the specialized high school admissions test, he received criticism for targeting low income asian american students, many of whom attend those schools, and for focusing on the eight schools that he doesn’t have the power to change, instead of the far greater number that he does control. de blasio convened a task force with the aim of creating a plan to desegregate city public schools. in 2019, it released its final report, which included recommendations like eliminating screened schools. last month, public school students filed a federal civil rights lawsuit accusing the city of discriminating against black and latino students with screening processes for the city’s top public schools. it seems that the pandemic finally pushed de blasio to take action after years of activism by student leaders and integration advocates, leading to the biggest shakeup of the city’s school admissions process in years. those who have pushed for these kinds of changes applauded de blasio’s announcement, even as they say that the city must do more to eliminate segregation that has long plagued city schools, create a more equitable school system and address the root problems that have created academic disparities between black and latino students and their white counterparts. next story: what to know about the new coronavirus mutation news & politics policy personality opinion nyn media list nominations first read magazine media resource directory events jobs about merchandise awards, plaques & permissions follow us help us tailor content specifically for you:

before district 15 implemented a lottery based system for middle school admissions, m.s. 51 in park slope selected students based on grades and other measures. (patrick wall / chalkbeat) charlie tolan’s offer letter for sixth grade, a seat at charles o. dewey middle school, initially left him deeply disappointed. it was 2019, the first year his brooklyn district removed selective admissions in favor of a lottery. none of his friends from p.s. 10 in south park slope had been matched to the school in sunset park, and he understood it had a “bad reputation” in his community. state test scores were lower than at the schools he preferred, and there were rumors of discipline problems. but charlie’s attitude, and his family’s, changed when september rolled around. he quickly made friends, he liked his teachers, and he found the classes engaging and just the right level of challenge, said his mom, lisa raymond tolan. charlie, now in ninth grade, was in the inaugural class of the new york city education department’s effort to better integrate district 15’s middle schools through overhauling admissions. the process came after years of parent advocacy but was also met with trepidation from some families. still, charlie didn’t see himself as a participant in some kind of virtuous social equity experiment. “charlie just got absorbed into dewey,” his mother said. “it’s not like there were all these diversity and inclusion things happening overtly at the school. it was just middle school and that’s what it should be.” the district’s middle schools now enroll a more demographically mixed group of children than they had before. the share of low income students at most of the schools has shifted closer to the average figure across the district (though shifts in some schools have been larger than in others). but some diversity advocates suggest that’s just the first step. “it’s not just about moving bodies,” said lena dalke, a school integration advocate at new york appleseed who works with middle school student activists. it’s about “how to create welcoming spaces in all schools for all students.” now, proponents of the district 15 plan including educators, advocates, parents and students are considering what happens after a school becomes more racially, ethnically, and economically mixed, and how to foster schools that are supportive of students and families from different backgrounds. what has worked and what hasn’t in district 15’s plan, which took effect for rising sixth graders in the 2019 20 school year, might be worth a closer look as many other districts across the city recently announced they are dropping selective admissions for next year’s incoming students after a two year pandemic related pause on screens for all middle schools. ten of the city’s 32 districts with schools that previously selected students based on grades or other measures opted to ditch screens, though unlike district 15, few of them had explicit diversity goals with seats set aside for certain children. one outcome is evident as the students in district 15’s first class of the diversity initiative have gone on to high school this year: attitudes about schools have begun to change in some corners of brooklyn, but other patterns around the desirability of certain schools remain hard to break. for raymond tolan, dewey offered “a tremendous amount of support” when her son needed help with social concerns; she found the principal, amanda bueno, to be “truly amazing.” over the past two years, she and charlie represented dewey at park slope forums for fifth graders and their parents considering their middle school options. their attendance was itself evidence of a change: “i don’t think dewey would have been even invited in years past,” raymond tolan said. “i do think there was a shift in the narrative, that dewey is a good place to go.” district 15, which runs from boerum hill to sunset park, is one of the most racially and economically diverse in the city, but its schools have also been segregated. at m.s. 447 in boerum hill, about 27% of students were from low income families in the 2018 19 school year; at sunset park’s dewey, the share was 93%. geography accounts for some of that, as families from more affluent and whiter neighborhoods like park slope and windsor terrace favored nearby schools, and lower income and immigrant families living in the south part of the district clustered in dewey and sunset park prep. but advocates for equity in education say that academic screens were a significant factor: all but one of the 11 schools in the district used screens in their admissions decisions, and students from families with fewer resources were far more likely to be excluded from well resourced, sought after schools due to missing the necessary grade and test score cutoffs. under the new system, middle schools would no longer use screens such as grades, state test scores, auditions, or attendance records to select sixth graders. instead, admissions would be by lottery, and priority would be given to students who were english language learners, low income, or lived in temporary housing, with a goal of filling 52% of spots in each school with priority applicants (matching the ratio of families in the district who qualified for free or reduced price lunch). in lively public meetings, some parents argued that retaining screens ensured a merit based process; others suggested that affluent families needed to stop hoarding privilege. resistance to the diversity initiative trickled down to some students as well. melanie rosas reyes, now an 11th grade activist with integratenyc from sunset park, brooklyn, first heard about the plan from classmates at their well resourced middle school in boerum hill who opposed the idea. implementing a lottery instead of screening applicants, these students reasoned, would reduce the chances their high performing younger siblings would get their top choice. “the idea of meritocracy, that some students deserve certain things because they worked hard it was really harmful for me to internalize that,” melanie said. “i would have appreciated having a wider frame, because i was just hearing what privileged people thought about the admissions plan, and not the people who would benefit from it,” such as children from families like hers in sunset park. when admissions results were released in 2019, even advocates of the plan were surprised by the results: nine of the 11 middle schools reached the planners’ target range of 40% to 75% of offers to low income students, up from four schools the year before, according to education department data. in 2018, the last year when screens were used, just 16% of offers to m.s. 442 in windsor terrace went to priority group children. in 2019, the first lottery year, the rate jumped to 52%. in the south end of the district, at dewey, 91% of offers went to students in the priority group in 2018; in 2019, that number fell to 67%. “the plan had a big impact on the composition of schools,” said adam lubinsky, managing principal at wxy studio, the urban planning firm that helped design the new system. “it was really encouraging to see.” across the district, economic segregation in sixth grade decreased by 55% and racial segregation decreased by 38% compared with the previous year. the proponents of the district 15 diversity plan understood that redistributing students among the 11 district middle schools would not be the end of the job. (this year a 12th middle school opened in the district.) “as hard as that demographic shifting piece is, it is relatively easy compared to the inclusion and equity work,” notes carrie mcclaren, who served as a parent representative on the working group for the diversity plan. “there are no quick fixes, unfortunately.” that proved true for some students who were in the minority at their new schools. melina mays made the long commute from her home in red hook to sunset park prep, which she had ranked first on her application, impressed on the tour by the warmth of the principal and the enthusiasm of the students. but melina, who was one of just a handful of black students in her class, encountered hostility from a group of boys who harassed her and her friend with racial slurs. although the school did contact the ringleader’s parents, according to melina, she says the behavior continued. (sunset park prep did not respond to a request for comment.) neither melina nor her mother, dorothy mays, felt the school community was especially welcoming to people from “outside.” because melina had injured her foot, mays took her daughter to and from school during her eighth grade year, but she rarely interacted with other parents when she was there. “the person i spoke to the most was the school crossing guard,” she said. mays says she understood there was often a language barrier   some of the parents did not speak fluent english, and she doesn’t speak spanish   but she added, “they really need to work on making you feel welcome.” mays summed up her thoughts on her daughter’s middle school years: “i hope other people have a better experience than she did. and that they really work on diversifying the whole school system.” the planners had outlined an ambitious range of proposals to reinforce the diversity plan, including an ethnic studies curriculum, the hiring of more teachers of color and bilingual school counselors, attention to racially disproportionate suspension rates, and collaboration among ptas to encourage “cross cultural community building.” but then came the pandemic, which sent the first cohort of the diversity initiative home to learn by zoom in the spring of their sixth grade year. the challenges of remote learning, and then of recalibrating for in person classes, consumed educators, parents, and students for the next two years. some diversity support programs did get under way: the d15 community education council arranged for implicit bias training for principals and assistant principals, and created an “equity team” in each middle school, composed of “teachers, parents, and anyone at the school who wants to participate in creating a welcoming school environment,” camille casaretti, d15’s cec president, wrote in an email. some middle schools organized events to highlight diversity. one had a “peace and diversity day,” for example, and another recently held a latinx heritage teach in. now that the new school year has begun with some semblance of normalcy, plans are in the works to “identify inequities in resources and program offerings” among schools and to address those inequities, casaretti wrote. students have also taken an interest in advancing conversations around diversity. with the help of dalke, from appleseed, and sarah stone, a middle school coach from integratenyc, students formed integrate clubs in each middle school, which provide a hub to discuss topics such as building relationships and restorative justice. the clubs from different schools also meet up to share perspectives. for one such meeting, the students visited park slope collegiate, the only school in the district where students must enter through metal detectors, and discussed why the scanners might make some people feel targeted or fearful rather than safe. four years ago, when families were first grappling with the new admissions system, “there was apprehension from parents about applying to or attending schools that were unfamiliar,” said nyah berg, appleseed’s executive director. nevertheless, fifth graders that first year placed many more schools on their lists than their older peers had in previous years, and that trend has continued. “students and parents were looking around the district a lot more,” said lubinsky at wxy, rather than treading the same worn paths to the same few familiar schools. “that was really healthy for the district.” berg also believes attitudes have changed: “one parent said we used to have three ‘good schools’ and now we know they are all good schools.” the application data back that up: more white families are applying to sunset park prep and dewey, and more immigrant families are applying to the schools that historically enrolled a large majority of white students, according to dalke. nevertheless, some patterns of segregation have persisted. at dewey, the share of offers that went to low income students has crept up again after the initial decrease to 67%. last year, 86% of offers went to children in the priority group, according to data shared by the district’s community education council. in the 2021 22 school year, nearly 90% of children at dewey and sunset park prep were living in poverty, according to doe records   less than before the lottery but still well above the other district 15 schools. breaking those patterns, it seems, requires more than a lottery that gives a boost to historically marginalized students: it requires affluent families who recognize the value of a small, nurturing school like dewey or sunset park, and who are willing to ignore entrenched assumptions about what a “good school” really means, advocates said. raymond tolan, the dewey parent, has revised her own thoughts in that regard, in comparing the experiences of charlie to that of her older son, who had attended m.s. 51, in park slope, which positioned itself as a school for academically gifted students. “is the school going to take care of my kid and help them when they need it, whether academically or socially?” raymond tolan wrote in an email. “at dewey, they knew charlie well and were there for him   and us   when we needed it.” wxy has begun an evaluation of how well the district 15 diversity initiative is working so far, which may illuminate why some habits and attitudes have been resistant to change. with about a third of the city’s districts deciding to embrace lottery admissions, advocates and planners involved with district 15’s initiative will be watching closely. “it’ll be interesting to see how these other districts respond,” lubinsky said. “district 15 has been a useful precedent.” tracy tullis is a freelance journalist based in brooklyn. chalkbeat is a civic news company newsroom ©2025

how a series of choices has deepened the segregation of brooklyn’s schools in leafy, liberal park slope and the brooklyn neighborhoods nearby, many parents divide the local middle schools into two tiers: the “big three” and the rest. first among the big three is m.s. 51 on park slope’s bustling fifth avenue. one of a dozen middle schools that families can choose from if they live within a four mile long stretch of west brooklyn known as district 15, m.s. 51 is where mayor bill de blasio sent his children and where students find a well traveled path to the city’s most elite public high schools. next on the big three list are m.s. 447, a boerum hill school that specializes in math and science, and new voices school of academic and creative arts, a performing arts school in sunset park. in theory, any student who lives in district 15’s borders which include not only the well heeled park slope and carroll gardens neighborhoods, but also working class red hook and sunset park can attend the big three. in practice, the schools are dominated by a subset of families: at the big three, over 50 percent of students are white, and less than 30 percent come from low income families. at the other nine middle schools, just 10 percent of students are white, and more than 80 percent are poor. that divide highlights a harsh truth about the sources of school segregation in new york city. many people, including mayor de blasio, point to segregated neighborhoods as the cause of separate schools. in fact, many of the city’s school zones and districts encompass a mix of families. and by opening up every school to any family in a district, “school choice” systems like the one in district 15 offer a golden opportunity to override divided neighborhoods and make schools integrated. instead, district parents, schools, and officials have made choices that reinforce segregation. in the whiter, wealthier northern half of district 15, competition is fierce for a seat at a big three school. “you have to battle for your so called ‘choice,’” said antonia martinelli, a gowanus parent and blogger who put m.s. 51 and 447 at the top of her son’s application. otherwise, “there’s a fear that your child won’t get into a good enough high school.” some parents pay a private consultant $400 for a two hour consultation about the district’s admission process. others rely on their social circles. because parents believe that attending one of the school tours will increase their odds of admission, many wait at their computers for the exact moment when online registration begins. the spots are usually snatched up within hours. “it’s almost a full time job,” said rhonda keyser, whose child attends m.s. 51. but ultimately, the competition is within a narrow group of parents. eight of the district’s 25 elementary schools send half or more of their students to one of the big three, according to city data. those elementary schools are on average 64 percent white and just 17 percent low income. districtwide, 31 percent of students are white and 65 percent are considered poor. monica kipiniak’s son attends the school for international studies, one of several district and charter schools where families who did not make it into the big three are starting to venture. she said the fight for big three seats favors wealthier parents with the time and ability to navigate the process and to ensure their students are strong academically. “there’s no question,” she said, “that for many reasons, kids who come from more affluent families end up going to the more desirable schools.” just a few subway stops away, the southern end of district 15 can seem worlds apart from that frenzy. in sunset park, an immigrant filled neighborhood home to many hispanic families and its own chinatown, many parents are daunted by the application process and opt to only apply to local middle schools they know, said julie stein brockway, co director of the center for family life in sunset park. still, she said many would consider applying to northern end schools if they were encouraged to. but even though her social service agency works with hundreds of local families, she said only charter schools have asked her for help recruiting sunset park students never one of the big three. “i’ve been at this agency for 34 years and nobody’s reached out to me,” she said. “it’s not like we don’t have access to families we could certainly be helpful.” even when schools in the northern end have been invited to meet with sunset park families, some have declined. several people at p.s. 172, a high performing sunset park school, said many district middle schools failed to send representatives to an information session for parents that the school hosted last fall. “there was a lot of disappointment,” said alexa aviles, p.s. 172’s parent teacher association co president. “it just begs the question: what’s the responsibility of middle schools to do outreach across the district?” and then there are the “screens” the criteria that selective schools use to rank applicants. the big three release the factors they consider class grades, test scores, attendance, behavior marks, interviews, or auditions, depending on the school but not the cutoff levels for any of those categories. whether m.s. 51, for instance, only seeks “a” students with sterling attendance records who aced the state exams, or a greater mix, is a secret. the principals of m.s. 51 and new voices did not respond to interview requests. m.s. 447 principal arin rusch simply said: “it’s a ranking system.” advocates say an even greater problem than their lack of transparency is how the system allows a handful of schools to cream the highest performing students which then floods the remaining schools with the neediest ones. the data show that last year’s average incoming student at the big three had performed at a level 3.4 out of 4 on the state math exams when they were in fourth grade. by contrast, the average student at the district’s other schools entered at a level 2.3, considered below passing. “we don’t think there’s any legitimate justification for sorting kids like that,” said reyhan mehran, a member of a group called district 15 parents for middle school equity. “clustering children who are high needs and low needs into different schools doesn’t help anybody.” in october, district 15 parents for middle school equity distributed paper and online petitions calling for an admissions system “that does not promote sorting and segregating our district’s 10 year olds.” the handful of parents at the core of the equity group have surveyed their peers about the current admissions system and given presentations on the segregation they say it leads to. without endorsing a particular solution, they have said one option is “controlled choice” a district wide enrollment system that uses demographic information about families and their school preferences to assign students to schools. the system is typically used to spread poor and affluent students evenly among schools and avoid the type of tiered system like the one in district 15. but even people who are sympathetic to the group’s message question whether controlled choice would stand a chance in the district. affluent parents buy homes in the high priced neighborhoods around coveted elementary schools, like p.s. 321, expecting that this will give their child an edge in getting into a big three middle school and then a top high school. it’s hard to imagine such parents backing a plan that would restrict their access to the big three. “are they willing to give up their seat in 51 for a child in the southern part of the district?” said naila rosario, president of the district’s community education council and a parent at p.s. 172. “that has yet to be seen.” if parents strongly oppose a plan like controlled choice, that could doom it. mayor de blasio has said the city must respect parents’ choice to live near desired schools, and chancellor carmen fariña has said the city should not mandate integration it must happen “organically.” that has left advocates like the parents in district 15’s equity group trying to rally enough support for an alternative system to convince the city to act. city councilman brad lander, who represents the district and whose own children attended m.s. 51, said he wants the district to work toward adopting a controlled choice system for its middle schools. a plan to move immediately to an integrated system “would have no chance and it would fail,” lander said. “a better approach is something that recognizes the moral urgency of equity, but takes steps to make things better.” and some steps are being taken, including a plan to adopt a new admissions policy at at m.s. 447 one of the big three. but even proponents of the school level changes say they don’t go far enough to overcome the district’s deep divisions. that, they say, would take a system wide solution. “there is nothing ‘organic’ about school segregation,” said park slope collegiate principal jill bloomberg. “if we’re serious about undoing it, then we have to make it a policy.” this post appears courtesy of chalkbeat new york. more stories the high speed preschool experiment the privilege of school choice

linkedin and 3rd parties use essential and non essential cookies to provide, secure, analyze and improve our services, and to show you relevant ads (including professional and job ads) on and off linkedin. learn more in our cookie policy. select accept to consent or reject to decline non essential cookies for this use. you can update your choices at any time in your settings. agree & join linkedin by clicking continue to join or sign in, you agree to linkedin’s user agreement, privacy policy, and cookie policy. 912 followers middle schools in brooklyn's district 15 are showing promising results in desegregation efforts without sparking a major exodus from public schools. here's how 👇 1. lottery based admissions, prioritizing low income students: "selective admissions were scrapped. every child got a lottery number instead. schools adopted targets to admit certain numbers of disadvantaged children." 2. focusing desegregation efforts on socioeconomic divides: "instead of using race, the district employed other categories to diversify student bodies. specifically, schools prioritized students who are homeless, learning english or from low income families   factors that are often correlated to race but that do not face the same legal challenges." meaningful change is possible when districts come together to embrace diversity and equity in education! https://lnkd.in/ghsshbyc to view or add a comment, sign in cornell/nyu grad, top real estate broker #theadrteam award winner @bhs over $1b sold nyc, hamptons, miami, worldwide; diversity (deib) consultant coach text 917 680 3382 what happened when brooklyn tried to integrate its middle schools a new report found that many schools enrolled more racially and socioeconomically diverse groups of students without sparking a major exodus of families from public schools. seeking to solve a problem that has vexed public schools around the country for decades, one progressive section of new york undertook an ambitious plan to better integrate middle schools that were among the most homogenous in the city. selective admissions were scrapped. every child got a lottery number instead. schools adopted targets to admit certain numbers of disadvantaged children. and unlike in many places where integration attempts faced fierce opposition, parents led the effort. now, five years later, the plan appears to be working. middle schools in a section of northwest brooklyn that stretches from sunset park to cobble hill went from being the second most socioeconomically segregated to 19th out of the city’s 32 local districts. teachers and students say friendships are emerging across income lines. and while opposition to integration efforts is often focused on concern that middle class and white families will abandon public schools, the area   district 15   has not seen a major exodus. the city’s public school enrollment has dropped as families leave new york or move to charters, but the district’s declines have been less extreme than elsewhere. across american public schools, more than a third of all students attend a school where most of their peers share the same race or ethnicity. but the supreme court has also limited how schools can use race to sort students among schools, and efforts to address racial segregation have mostly stalled. instead of using race, the district employed other categories to diversify student bodies and bring students with different life experiences and resources together. specifically, schools prioritized students who are homeless, learning english or from low income families   factors that are often correlated to race but that do not pose the same legal challenges. the question of how to integrate schools has prompted heated debates across new york. in northwest brooklyn and across the city, some asian american families in particular have fought efforts to overhaul admissions that they say could lead to their children losing access to prime educational opportunities that they have worked hard for. the plan in brooklyn’s district 15 is a rare of example of progress on desegregation that has prompted less public conflict. https://lnkd.in/ej_jar3h to view or add a comment, sign in nonprofit attorney at communities rise racial segregation in our schools is worse today than at the height of the integration efforts following the passage of the civil rights act. when school districts try to solve this, white families tend to flee the district. but brooklyn school district no. 15 appears to have found a way to successfully integrate its district. first, the district uses a lottery system rather than a merit based application system. it doesn't feel developmentally appropriate to put 10 year olds through an application gauntlet to prove how well educated they already are. and i've long believed that this business of schools only accepting "smart" kids is like a hospital only accepting healthy patients it's the exact opposite of what schools are for. plus, a lottery avoids any legal problems with race based selection criteria, especially in this era of increased white nationalism. second, a strong community of parents *led* the integration effort, which was remarkable given how parents have historically launched powerful opposition campaigns to school integration efforts. by focusing on improving (and celebrating) the quality of all the district's schools, there was no longer a rat race to try to get your kid into the "best" school or to avoid the "bad" school. “‘we’ve managed to debunk this good school bad school narrative,’ said antonia martinelli, a mother in the district who helped push for the plan, and who also serves as a parent leader. ‘parents understand that they’re all great schools.’” this can do attitude and abundance mindset is a welcome antidote to the pessimistic attitude and scarcity mindset that too often creates an every man for himself panic which leads to worse educational outcomes for everyone. this paradigm shift is really what we need to combat so many other policy problems: income inequality, healthcare, homelessness, immigration, etc. to view or add a comment, sign in chief executive officer at inquilinos boricuas en accion a recent report by the racial imbalance advisory council shows that an overwhelming number of massachusetts students are still attending substandard segregated schools. of the over 225,000 students affected by school segregation, up to 65% of those affected identify as latino and 25% are black. this staggering disparity is disappointing and unacceptable. it tells us that it is critical that we remain focused on addressing these issues to ensure that all students receive a high quality, inclusive education. in addition to holding school districts accountable for creating integrated schools and establishing programs to improve student outcomes in non white segregated schools, we need to address housing affordability and zoning reform to create communities that are racially diverse and multicultural. we urge the ma massachusetts state senate to pass the affordable homes act to address the housing crisis that we are facing and create more inclusive communities. that way, we will help our students receive the education they deserve! read report here: https://lnkd.in/etpwzajk to view or add a comment, sign in retired school superintendent and professor, author, inspirational speaker/trainer, and founder of perkup, llc. 𝗛𝗼𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗻 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗦𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗼𝗹 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰𝘁 (𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗗) 𝗶𝘀 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗵𝗮𝘂𝗹. led by superintendent mike miles, the district is implementing sweeping changes in teaching methods, teacher evaluation, and school spending. this experiment, driven by a state takeover, aims to improve student outcomes, especially for black and latino students. while early test scores show promise, critics point to high teacher turnover and financial concerns. the district's future direction will depend on long term results and community support. this experiment is closely watched by educators nationwide as a 𝗽𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗼𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺. https://lnkd.in/gfrxwhbd to view or add a comment, sign in 308 followers 𝗛𝗼𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗻 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗦𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗼𝗹 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰𝘁 (𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗗) 𝗶𝘀 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗵𝗮𝘂𝗹. led by superintendent mike miles, the district is implementing sweeping changes in teaching methods, teacher evaluation, and school spending. this experiment, driven by a state takeover, aims to improve student outcomes, especially for black and latino students. while early test scores show promise, critics point to high teacher turnover and financial concerns. the district's future direction will depend on long term results and community support. this experiment is closely watched by educators nationwide as a 𝗽𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗼𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺. https://lnkd.in/gvgenx3k to view or add a comment, sign in 852 followers how are #communityschools transforming #publiceducation? 📚 improving academic performance 📚 improving attendance 📚 advancing racial equity 📚 increasing teacher retention 📚 increasing school safety 📚 increasing family engagement 📚 avoiding school closures 📚 addressing the housing crisis that's just the magic of #community led schools! interested? check out the full report made with our partners at in the public interest and network for public education! https://lnkd.in/gax4wyht #csforward to view or add a comment, sign in learner. ethicist. futurist. strategist. leader. i connect ideas; i connect people; i connect people and ideas. thoughtful reporting here on the school situation in chicago, with a balanced perspective emerging from the polling of parents regarding reasonable expectations. i think it's vital to find ways to support teachers and schools, and also recognize that the work they do takes place in a context. generally speaking, zip code and socio economic status have a higher correlation with educational outcomes than quality of instruction, and when you do the math kids spend less than 10% of their hours between birth an age 18 in school. success will depend on aligning supports for outside of school factors. one key takeaway from my attendance at the oakland literacy coalition's "literacy & justice for all" conference was the importance of crafting programmatic supports that add value to what schools are doing, rather than draw energy away. that sounds intuitively right to me. schools aren't the whole picture, but they are an essential part of it. https://lnkd.in/gxnt5vzd to view or add a comment, sign in 111 followers the issue of the school to prison pipeline has been a prevalent concern in our society for generations. many at risk students face obstacles that make them more susceptible to ending up in the criminal justice system rather than thriving in school and beyond. according to the economic opportunity institute, high quality care in the first years of life can greatly reduce the risk that today’s babies and toddlers will become tomorrow’s violent teens and adults. specifically, new research on chicago’s government funded child parent centers tracked 3 and 4 year olds enrolled in the program for 15 years. children who did not participate in the preschool program were 70% more likely to be arrested for a violent crime by age 18. given this starting point, readers all sets forth on a mission to ensure these stats do not reflect future data in the state of maryland. to learn more about readers all, visit our website (readersall.org). to view or add a comment, sign in dr. of education in leadership and learning. district and building leader sda, sas interesting read and statistics given the declining enrollment we are facing in our own county schools! it's real and we need to recognize that while closing a school is never easy.. we need to recognize that there are sound reasons for doing so. the school’s size will also be its demise, sara randazzo and matt barnum write. los angeles unified school district is closing solis this summer, citing declining enrollment that has severely limited the school’s offerings. as birthrates have dipped, families have moved elsewhere, and public school alternatives have grown, many urban districts have hemorrhaged students. that has left officials with the difficult choice of keeping open shrinking schools with resources spread thin or shutting them down, a move that inevitably garners fierce community backlash. how school leaders navigate this challenge could define urban school systems for the next several years. but if schools get too small they face a paradoxical problem: costs per student tend to rise, but programming tends to shrink. “when schools get below a certain size threshold, they start facing these unique challenges that make it hard to deliver a high quality education,”. to view or add a comment, sign in public policy professional focused on education finance, inequality, and opportunity i'm excited to share a new new america   education policy program brief, co authored with my colleague jordan abbott, on segregation between school districts in the 21st century. tomorrow marks the 70 year anniversary of the brown v. board of education supreme court decision striking down school segregation. but school integration efforts made only halting progress after the brown ruling, and backsliding began in the late 1980s. today, as the public school system sees both increasing diversity and declining enrollment, the patterns of segregation between school districts are shifting. if we're going to succeed at school integration, we need to target our efforts where students live and learn today. read the brief for more: https://lnkd.in/gyqreift and check out the longer report upon which this builds: https://lnkd.in/gtrcy cb for those looking for a short version of the brief's key themes and findings: 📈the percentage of students of color in america's public schools has steadily increased. even districts that saw overall population decline still saw increases in their numbers of students of color. ⛔ even though the country's public school enrollees are now majority (53%) students of color, the average school district is still large majority white (68%). so while the public school system as a whole is diversifying, students of different races still often attend school in separate districts. 🧱 in fact, the average district border only became more segregating since 2000, marking a racial divide of 11 percentage points then and increasing steadily to14 percentage points in 2021. 🧭 america's most segregating borders have crept westward. in 2000, the 100 biggest racial divides between neighboring districts were all east of the mississippi. there hasn't been a sea change, but we do now see some of these borders in the plains states, west, and southwest. ⭕ in metro areas, we repeatedly see a pattern in which inner ring suburbs are diversifying and outer ring suburbs are remaining or becoming more white. as a result, city school districts are less racially segregated from their immediate suburban neighbors, but inner  and outer ring suburbs are more segregated from each other than they used to be. urban/suburban segregation hasn't vanished, but it has frequently moved one level outward. #segregation #integration #diversity #brownat70 #publiceducation #publicschools #edequity to view or add a comment, sign in 912 followers create your free account or sign in to continue your search or by clicking continue to join or sign in, you agree to linkedin’s user agreement, privacy policy, and cookie policy. new to linkedin? join now or new to linkedin? join now by clicking continue to join or sign in, you agree to linkedin’s user agreement, privacy policy, and cookie policy. linkedin never miss a beat on the app don’t have the app? get it in the microsoft store.

linkedin and 3rd parties use essential and non essential cookies to provide, secure, analyze and improve our services, and to show you relevant ads (including professional and job ads) on and off linkedin. learn more in our cookie policy. select accept to consent or reject to decline non essential cookies for this use. you can update your choices at any time in your settings. agree & join linkedin by clicking continue to join or sign in, you agree to linkedin’s user agreement, privacy policy, and cookie policy. cornell/nyu grad, top real estate broker #theadrteam award winner @bhs over $1b sold nyc, hamptons, miami, worldwide; diversity (deib) consultant coach text 917 680 3382 what happened when brooklyn tried to integrate its middle schools a new report found that many schools enrolled more racially and socioeconomically diverse groups of students without sparking a major exodus of families from public schools. seeking to solve a problem that has vexed public schools around the country for decades, one progressive section of new york undertook an ambitious plan to better integrate middle schools that were among the most homogenous in the city. selective admissions were scrapped. every child got a lottery number instead. schools adopted targets to admit certain numbers of disadvantaged children. and unlike in many places where integration attempts faced fierce opposition, parents led the effort. now, five years later, the plan appears to be working. middle schools in a section of northwest brooklyn that stretches from sunset park to cobble hill went from being the second most socioeconomically segregated to 19th out of the city’s 32 local districts. teachers and students say friendships are emerging across income lines. and while opposition to integration efforts is often focused on concern that middle class and white families will abandon public schools, the area   district 15   has not seen a major exodus. the city’s public school enrollment has dropped as families leave new york or move to charters, but the district’s declines have been less extreme than elsewhere. across american public schools, more than a third of all students attend a school where most of their peers share the same race or ethnicity. but the supreme court has also limited how schools can use race to sort students among schools, and efforts to address racial segregation have mostly stalled. instead of using race, the district employed other categories to diversify student bodies and bring students with different life experiences and resources together. specifically, schools prioritized students who are homeless, learning english or from low income families   factors that are often correlated to race but that do not pose the same legal challenges. the question of how to integrate schools has prompted heated debates across new york. in northwest brooklyn and across the city, some asian american families in particular have fought efforts to overhaul admissions that they say could lead to their children losing access to prime educational opportunities that they have worked hard for. the plan in brooklyn’s district 15 is a rare of example of progress on desegregation that has prompted less public conflict. https://lnkd.in/ej_jar3h to view or add a comment, sign in 912 followers middle schools in brooklyn's district 15 are showing promising results in desegregation efforts without sparking a major exodus from public schools. here's how 👇 1. lottery based admissions, prioritizing low income students: "selective admissions were scrapped. every child got a lottery number instead. schools adopted targets to admit certain numbers of disadvantaged children." 2. focusing desegregation efforts on socioeconomic divides: "instead of using race, the district employed other categories to diversify student bodies. specifically, schools prioritized students who are homeless, learning english or from low income families   factors that are often correlated to race but that do not face the same legal challenges." meaningful change is possible when districts come together to embrace diversity and equity in education! https://lnkd.in/ghsshbyc to view or add a comment, sign in nonprofit attorney at communities rise racial segregation in our schools is worse today than at the height of the integration efforts following the passage of the civil rights act. when school districts try to solve this, white families tend to flee the district. but brooklyn school district no. 15 appears to have found a way to successfully integrate its district. first, the district uses a lottery system rather than a merit based application system. it doesn't feel developmentally appropriate to put 10 year olds through an application gauntlet to prove how well educated they already are. and i've long believed that this business of schools only accepting "smart" kids is like a hospital only accepting healthy patients it's the exact opposite of what schools are for. plus, a lottery avoids any legal problems with race based selection criteria, especially in this era of increased white nationalism. second, a strong community of parents *led* the integration effort, which was remarkable given how parents have historically launched powerful opposition campaigns to school integration efforts. by focusing on improving (and celebrating) the quality of all the district's schools, there was no longer a rat race to try to get your kid into the "best" school or to avoid the "bad" school. “‘we’ve managed to debunk this good school bad school narrative,’ said antonia martinelli, a mother in the district who helped push for the plan, and who also serves as a parent leader. ‘parents understand that they’re all great schools.’” this can do attitude and abundance mindset is a welcome antidote to the pessimistic attitude and scarcity mindset that too often creates an every man for himself panic which leads to worse educational outcomes for everyone. this paradigm shift is really what we need to combat so many other policy problems: income inequality, healthcare, homelessness, immigration, etc. to view or add a comment, sign in chief executive officer at inquilinos boricuas en accion a recent report by the racial imbalance advisory council shows that an overwhelming number of massachusetts students are still attending substandard segregated schools. of the over 225,000 students affected by school segregation, up to 65% of those affected identify as latino and 25% are black. this staggering disparity is disappointing and unacceptable. it tells us that it is critical that we remain focused on addressing these issues to ensure that all students receive a high quality, inclusive education. in addition to holding school districts accountable for creating integrated schools and establishing programs to improve student outcomes in non white segregated schools, we need to address housing affordability and zoning reform to create communities that are racially diverse and multicultural. we urge the ma massachusetts state senate to pass the affordable homes act to address the housing crisis that we are facing and create more inclusive communities. that way, we will help our students receive the education they deserve! read report here: https://lnkd.in/etpwzajk to view or add a comment, sign in 912 followers we're less than a month from the 70th anniversary of the landmark brown v. board of education supreme court decision, yet racial and socio economic segregation in schools remains a persistent issue. thank you, congressman bobby scott, for your leadership in calling for a hearing to address this ongoing problem. we must address school segregation now. progress towards meaningful school integration has been resisted since the decision, and we must acknowledge some important missteps along the way, but we know this strategy benefits all students. racial and economic segregation is a widespread problem in schools despite research consistently showing that diverse schools have positive academic and social outcomes for students. https://lnkd.in/gxmjprbj to view or add a comment, sign in transportation manager at 20th century fox film during the past decade, the nation's 25 largest suburban areas saw a doubling of the number of districts that are 90% 100% nonwhite, 30% of the nation's entire public school enrollment is in those largest 25 suburban areas. in 10 years, those suburban schools saw a steep drop of about 850,000 white students   and an increase of more than 1 million new latino students. to view or add a comment, sign in cnn, msnbc & essence education contributor, head of school & founder of capital preparatory schools | keynote speaker many of our children underperform in public schools because, in many cases, there is a lack of representation due to systemic racism. historically, schools in marginalized communities were never designed to effectively educate black and brown children. this has resulted in a persistent achievement gap, where students of color are often deprived of equitable resources, culturally relevant curricula, and supportive learning environments. to truly support all students, we must confront and dismantle these systemic barriers, ensuring that every child receives the quality education they deserve. #schoolchoice #urbaneducation #schooltransformation #schoolinnovation to view or add a comment, sign in 1,969 followers welcome to school is a documentary produced in 2023 by the maya angelou schools and see forever foundation in conjunction with unchained stories, a social impact production company. the film traces the 25 year legacy of the washington, dc based maya angelou schools’ storied history of grassroots organizing, resource activism, and creating a specialized safe space for carceral and alternative education students. welcome to school is told through first person narratives from current students, alumni, staff, faculty, and the organization’s founders. the intersection between poverty, public education, and the juvenile justice system from the 1990s to present day are examined alongside the retelling of the maya angelou schools’ origins. the cycles of collective trauma, inappropriate reprimand of students, and the presence of police and police adjacent agencies against the backdrop of undersourced ward neighborhoods all affect the educational environment. the maya angelou schools began as the student by student counter to these institutional barriers. throughout the decades, the maya angelou schools’ founders, board, parents, faculty, and staff have questioned the bureaucracy of the traditional education system’s teaching and learning expectations against the reality of dc’s students. welcome to school highlights the fact that maya angelou schools grown from an initially experimental approach to educating students to a nationally recognized expert in serving opportunity and justice involved youth. their unique approach helped to solidify the maya schools as the premiere leader of alternative education and a school network providing second chances! https://lnkd.in/exzudxjk #mayaangelouschools #seeforeverfoundation #educationforall #welcometoschool to view or add a comment, sign in 308 followers 𝗛𝗼𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗻 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗦𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗼𝗹 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰𝘁 (𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗗) 𝗶𝘀 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗵𝗮𝘂𝗹. led by superintendent mike miles, the district is implementing sweeping changes in teaching methods, teacher evaluation, and school spending. this experiment, driven by a state takeover, aims to improve student outcomes, especially for black and latino students. while early test scores show promise, critics point to high teacher turnover and financial concerns. the district's future direction will depend on long term results and community support. this experiment is closely watched by educators nationwide as a 𝗽𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗼𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺. https://lnkd.in/gvgenx3k to view or add a comment, sign in public policy professional focused on education finance, inequality, and opportunity i'm excited to share a new new america   education policy program brief, co authored with my colleague jordan abbott, on segregation between school districts in the 21st century. tomorrow marks the 70 year anniversary of the brown v. board of education supreme court decision striking down school segregation. but school integration efforts made only halting progress after the brown ruling, and backsliding began in the late 1980s. today, as the public school system sees both increasing diversity and declining enrollment, the patterns of segregation between school districts are shifting. if we're going to succeed at school integration, we need to target our efforts where students live and learn today. read the brief for more: https://lnkd.in/gyqreift and check out the longer report upon which this builds: https://lnkd.in/gtrcy cb for those looking for a short version of the brief's key themes and findings: 📈the percentage of students of color in america's public schools has steadily increased. even districts that saw overall population decline still saw increases in their numbers of students of color. ⛔ even though the country's public school enrollees are now majority (53%) students of color, the average school district is still large majority white (68%). so while the public school system as a whole is diversifying, students of different races still often attend school in separate districts. 🧱 in fact, the average district border only became more segregating since 2000, marking a racial divide of 11 percentage points then and increasing steadily to14 percentage points in 2021. 🧭 america's most segregating borders have crept westward. in 2000, the 100 biggest racial divides between neighboring districts were all east of the mississippi. there hasn't been a sea change, but we do now see some of these borders in the plains states, west, and southwest. ⭕ in metro areas, we repeatedly see a pattern in which inner ring suburbs are diversifying and outer ring suburbs are remaining or becoming more white. as a result, city school districts are less racially segregated from their immediate suburban neighbors, but inner  and outer ring suburbs are more segregated from each other than they used to be. urban/suburban segregation hasn't vanished, but it has frequently moved one level outward. #segregation #integration #diversity #brownat70 #publiceducation #publicschools #edequity to view or add a comment, sign in 🌎geospatial leader | 📚educator | 🌱conservationist introducing another insightful project from zahava stadler and jordan abbott at new america. this project sheds light on a significant milestone: the seventieth anniversary of the historic united states supreme court decision brown v. board of education, celebrated in may 2024. expanding upon the crossing the line report, authored by zahava and jordan, which meticulously identifies the 100 most racially segregating borders in the country for 2021. these borders delineate the greatest disparities in the percentage of students of color enrolled in the districts on either side. moreover, the report delves into the historical context of these divides, examining how entrenched racist housing policies have perpetuated residential segregation and contributed to unequal property values. these inequities, in turn, result in disparate allocation of local property tax dollars for schools. through rigorous analysis\ and compelling mapping visuals, zahava and jordan's project provides invaluable insights into the dynamics of school segregation in the united states over the past two decades. #esri #storymaps #gis #visualizations #history #spatialhistory public policy professional focused on education finance, inequality, and opportunity i'm excited to share a new new america   education policy program brief, co authored with my colleague jordan abbott, on segregation between school districts in the 21st century. tomorrow marks the 70 year anniversary of the brown v. board of education supreme court decision striking down school segregation. but school integration efforts made only halting progress after the brown ruling, and backsliding began in the late 1980s. today, as the public school system sees both increasing diversity and declining enrollment, the patterns of segregation between school districts are shifting. if we're going to succeed at school integration, we need to target our efforts where students live and learn today. read the brief for more: https://lnkd.in/gyqreift and check out the longer report upon which this builds: https://lnkd.in/gtrcy cb for those looking for a short version of the brief's key themes and findings: 📈the percentage of students of color in america's public schools has steadily increased. even districts that saw overall population decline still saw increases in their numbers of students of color. ⛔ even though the country's public school enrollees are now majority (53%) students of color, the average school district is still large majority white (68%). so while the public school system as a whole is diversifying, students of different races still often attend school in separate districts. 🧱 in fact, the average district border only became more segregating since 2000, marking a racial divide of 11 percentage points then and increasing steadily to14 percentage points in 2021. 🧭 america's most segregating borders have crept westward. in 2000, the 100 biggest racial divides between neighboring districts were all east of the mississippi. there hasn't been a sea change, but we do now see some of these borders in the plains states, west, and southwest. ⭕ in metro areas, we repeatedly see a pattern in which inner ring suburbs are diversifying and outer ring suburbs are remaining or becoming more white. as a result, city school districts are less racially segregated from their immediate suburban neighbors, but inner  and outer ring suburbs are more segregated from each other than they used to be. urban/suburban segregation hasn't vanished, but it has frequently moved one level outward. #segregation #integration #diversity #brownat70 #publiceducation #publicschools #edequity to view or add a comment, sign in 9,496 followers create your free account or sign in to continue your search or by clicking continue to join or sign in, you agree to linkedin’s user agreement, privacy policy, and cookie policy. new to linkedin? join now or new to linkedin? join now by clicking continue to join or sign in, you agree to linkedin’s user agreement, privacy policy, and cookie policy. linkedin never miss a beat on the app don’t have the app? get it in the microsoft store.

an official website of the united states government official websites use .gov a .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the united states. secure .gov websites use https a lock ( lock locked padlock icon ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. primary site navigation logged in as: corresponding author. accepted 2023 apr 20. this article is made available via the pmc open access subset for unrestricted research re use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. these permissions are granted for the duration of the world health organization (who) declaration of covid 19 as a global pandemic. this article uses interest convergence and market based theories to examine a recently adopted controlled choice school admissions model intended to desegregate a diverse, urban school district. drawing on longitudinal, qualitative interviews with advantaged parents who articulated support for controlled choice, we find that these parents' positive view of the measure was based on a belief that the desegregation policy benefited their own children as well as poor children of color. yet for many, support for the reform was contingent on their child’s school assignment, pointing to the limits of utilizing a market based model for achieving educational equity. keywords: school desegregation , controlled choice, interest convergence, school segregation, parent attitudes, school diversity controlled school choice defined as choice models in which a governing authority employs “controls” intended to equalize educational access and promote racial and/or socioeconomic school desegregation has existed in various forms and localities in the united states for decades (cobb & glass, 2009). the strategy has gained new traction in recent years, as policymakers recognize the segregating effects of unfettered market based choice while seeking to offer parents some degree of influence over their children’s school assignments (armor, 2019; kahlenberg, 2016). policymakers have been particularly attracted to controlled choice as a potential means of interrupting the negative effects of urban gentrification, where the neighborhood school model can quickly create segregated settings and exclude and/or displace longtime residents (butler, 2022; cucchiara, 2013; pearman & swain, 2017; quarles & butler, 2018). advocates argue that controlled choice is preferable to compulsory assignment as a means of school desegregation, in part because choice programs have grown increasingly popular in urban school districts and give “parents a feeling of ‘ownership,’” especially when schools offer a variety of themes, instructional strategies, and other variations (kahlenberg, 2013, p.11). if one central goal in any school desegregation plan is to interrupt white and middle class families’ ability to “hoard” educational resources and opportunities (sattin bajaj & roda, 2020), then controlled choice seeks to do so through a market mechanism designed to appeal to those same families’ educational interests. in this sense, controlled choice embodies interest convergence theory, which posits that the interests of the racially marginalized and historically oppressed will only be accommodated when those interests converge with the interests of white communities and policymakers. derrick bell (1980) introduced the notion of interest convergence to argue that the u.s. supreme court’s landmark brown decision banning school segregation was supported not only by “those concerned about the immorality of racial inequality” but also by “whites in policymaking positions” who were “able to see the economic and political advances at home and abroad that would follow abandonment of segregation” (p. 524). writing in the wake of disappointingly slow school desegregation efforts which, he maintained, had led to “debatable” educational benefits, and following a series of legal setbacks that he argued demonstrated a growing “divergence in the interests of whites and blacks” when it came school segregation, bell asserted that reformers should seek alternative strategies for improving educational opportunities for black children. encouraging activists to focus on school quality rather than desegregation, bell added: “many white parents recognize a value in integrated schooling for their children but they quite properly view integration as merely one component of an effective education” (p. 533). controlled choice can be understood as an effort to appeal to white and other advantaged parents’ perceptions of what constitutes an effective education alongside pursuit of greater access and equity for all, through a regulated market based model of school assignment. critics of controlled choice argue that such programs often offer parents only the illusion of empowerment and thus lead to “the loss (or ‘flight’) of white and middle class families” when they experience more “controls” than “choice” in their children’s school assignments (armor, 2019, p.2). the notion that white and other advantaged parents may reject controlled choice models that require their children to attend diverse schools in which they may be in the racial and/or socioeconomic minority is supported by an abundance of research documenting that white parents’ claims of valuing diverse educational settings for their children are rarely reflected in their school choices even, or perhaps especially, in politically liberal, affluent urban enclaves (evans, 2021; freidus, 2022; posey maddox, 2014; roda & wells, 2013; torres & weissbourd, 2020; wells, 2018). for controlled choice to function as an example of interest convergence, relatively advantaged families have to both value integrated educational settings and believe that their families’ individual educational interests can be served by them. researchers have examined educational outcomes associated with controlled choice models and explored the political and programmatic conditions under which controlled choice has succeeded in desegregating schools (cobb & glass, 2009; koedel, et al., 2009; learned miller, 2016; orfield & frankenberg, 2013). yet we know little about how advantaged families who support such measures engage in the controlled choice process, or about how they develop their school preferences in relation to the broader goals of racial and socioeconomic school desegregation and educational equity. understanding how such parents respond to a school desegregation model explicitly based on interest convergence is crucial, however, because, as bell (1980) maintained, while some white americans may support social and racial justice efforts based on “morality alone,” that number has historically been “insufficient to bring about the desired” reform (p. 525). this article explores how a group of white or otherwise socioeconomically advantaged parents in a school district in brooklyn, new york traversed a controlled choice model intended to both desegregate the district’s middle schools and appeal to advantaged parents’ educational interests. prior to adopting controlled choice, the district had assigned children to middle schools using a competitive admissions system in which popular schools were able to select their students based on academic and other performance based criteria. this system had contributed to racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic school segregation, but had also created considerable stress and anxiety among the district’s growing white and relatively advantaged populations (savitch lew, 2018; wxy, 2018). the district’s controlled choice model replaced competitive admissions with a lottery that prioritized the preferences of disadvantaged families, with the intention of equalizing access and diversifying student populations across schools (nyc office of the mayor, 2018). we draw on qualitative longitudinal interviews to examine how white and middle and upper class parents who articulated support for the controlled choice model experienced and responded to the admissions reform when applying for schools for their own children. we found that advantaged parents who supported controlled choice believed the admissions model benefited their children and children with fewer advantages, and they perceived the school assignment model as advancing the broader goals of educational equity, school desegregation, and social justice. yet for many of these parents, their support for controlled choice was contingent on the school to which their child was eventually assigned, and some developed “back up” plans in case they were displeased with their individual results. moreover, while many parents in this group identified a wide range of schools they deemed acceptable for their children, advantaged parents across racial and ethnic backgrounds sought to avoid schools that had been the most racially/ethnically and socioeconomically segregated prior to the implementation of controlled choice. our findings highlight a contradiction at the center of controlled choice as a model for school desegregation: on the one hand, the model is intended to advance the goal of educational equity while still appealing to the interests of white and socioeconomically advantaged families. in its reliance on a market based model of schooling that situates parents as consumers seeking the best “fit” for their children, however, the reform also frames education as a private commodity (horsford et al., 2019). ultimately our study suggests that the individualistic appeal of controlled choice may undermine the broader goal of equity unless matched with other efforts to dismantle deeply ingrained notions about the relationship between race, class and school quality. we draw on two theoretical frames to explore the contradiction we found at the heart of advantaged parents’ support for controlled choice: interest convergence theory and market based models of schooling. since bell first introduced it in 1980, interest convergence has become a central tenet of critical race theory and scholars have applied the idea beyond a black/white binary to explain “both progressive policies around race as well as policies that preserve the status quo” (castango and lee, 2007, p. 3). in the context of education, scholars have used interest convergence theory to explain white political support for and/or opposition to a host of equity related policies including: bilingual instruction (milner, 2008; sung, 2017), inclusive education (zion & blanchett, 2011); district level desegregation (diem et al., 2019; leigh, 2003), the use of native mascots at universities (castagno & lee, 2007), and the preservation of the neighborhood school model alongside expanding school choice (horsford, 2016). at the heart of interest convergence is the precept that most social justice advancements are understood within a “loss gain binary”  that is, the belief that in order for equity to prevail, white people and other advantaged groups must lose in some way (milner, 2008, p. 334). while some scholars argue that instances of interest convergence seem to present a “win win” policies or practices from which poor families of color and relatively advantaged white and other families may all benefit there are clearly limits to interest convergence as a means of achieving true equity (mcghee, 2022; milner, 2008). as lopez (2003) points out, relying on interest convergence for social reform “not only ensures that racism always remains firmly in place but that social progress advances at the pace that white people determine is reasonable and judicious” (p.84). while interest convergence theory helps in part to explain advantaged parents’ support for controlled choice in our study, the middle school admissions process they participated in was also informed by market based theories of schooling. all school choice models even those with equity controls in place are market based to the degree that they frame students and parents as consumers searching for the best educational “fit” for their families, and schools as service providers, modifying their programs and offerings in order to appeal to consumer demand (glazerman & dotte, 2010; horsford et al., 2019). by portraying education as a good to be procured in a market, school choice often exacerbates educational segregation and inequality, as parents are asked to seek out what they think is best for their children as individuals, rather than as part of a larger community (chingos & monarrez, 2020). school choice models can particularly undermine common good notions of education in gentrifying urban districts, as researchers have found that choice policies intended to attract and retain white and other middle and upper middle class families often: reinforce inequitable access to information (andré bechely, 2005; pattillo, 2015); reify parents’ racialized school preferences (billingham & hunt, 2016; evans, 2021; hailey, 2022); promote opportunity hoarding (sattin bajaj & roda, 2020; roda & wells, 2013); and accelerate the gentrification process itself (freidus, 2022; makris, 2015; quarles & butler, 2018). controlled choice models seek to address many of the inequities associated with unfettered school choice, as well as the segregating effects often produced through neighborhood based school assignment, by combining parental preferences with interventions intended to ensure racial, ethnic and socioeconomic diversity across school settings (ehlers, et al., 2014; orfield & frankenberg, 2013). since the u.s. supreme court’s 2007 ruling in parents involved limits the use of individual students’ racial identity as a determining factor in school assignment, controlled choice policies tend to use socioeconomic factors like poverty or zip code as proxies for achieving racial integration (frankenberg, 2017). yet even with equity based controls in place, school choice still asks families to make schooling decisions based on their individual interests. moreover, as horsford et al. (2019) point out, “market based approaches” to school reform “do not support state intervention in redressing racial, linguistic, and socioeconomic discrimination,” and instead view the common good produced through schooling as the culmination of individual choices, which are often enacted in highly racialized and inequitable contexts (p. 5). thus, while under the right circumstances, a controlled choice model may exemplify how interest convergence can lead to greater educational equity, its potential is also necessarily limited by its reliance on individual preferences that are couched within a race  and class based paradigm of school quality. controlled choice models vary considerably in both application and context, and research results have been mixed (reardon, et al., 2006). some scholars find that controlled choice policies have demonstrated success and should be replicated (learned miller, 2016; orfield & frankenberg, 2013). the “first” controlled choice district, in cambridge, massachusetts, adopted its system in 1981 and has employed this relatively stable, popular school assignment model for almost four decades (moss, 2019). other school systems have used controlled choice to successfully maintain racially integrated schools, including in jefferson county (kentucky) (frankenberg, 2017, 2018), berkeley, california (orfield & frankenberg, 2013), and champaign, illinois (potter, 2016). that said, research suggests that some controlled choice efforts have been less successful. san francisco’s socioeconomically weighted lottery school admissions system, once considered a national model, has come under intense public scrutiny as the city’s schools became more segregated with controlled choice than if students had been assigned a school closest to their homes (sumida, 2022). in 2010, waning political support for controlled choice in both charlotte and raleigh, north carolina led to the adoption of school admissions systems that prioritized students’ address and parental preference, resulting in increased racial segregation in both school systems (ayscue, et al., 2018). long time critic rossell (1995) argues that controlled choice plans are unpopular because they are mandatory, and thus produce more white flight and less racial exposure than voluntary integration. armor’s (2019) more recent research supports this claim, finding that six large districts in north carolina, kentucky, and florida experienced decreases in high income and white student populations, and failed to close the achievement gap between higher and lower income students, following implementation of controlled choice. research on controlled choice identifies three characteristics that likely contribute to programs’ sustained success. first, for parents and district officials to support controlled choice interventions they need to have confidence in the quality of the school options available (orfield & frankenberg, 2013). second, for controlled choice policies to be sustained, parent, community and district leadership need to be committed to the goal of school desegregation (diem, et al, 2015; frankenberg, 2018). lastly, districts must eliminate barriers to participation, such as a lack of transportation, for controlled choice to successfully promote greater school desegregation (koedel, et al., 2009). these basic conditions were met for the site of our study, (at least for the subset of parents we focus on here), making it an ideal case for examining how white and other advantaged parents who supported a controlled choice model for middle school admissions perceived and participated in the process for their own children. our study took place in brooklyn’s district 15, one of thirty two geographic school districts within the new york city department of education (nycdoe). the district encompasses an unusually racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse group of brooklyn neighborhoods, including parts of sunset park, a predominantly poor and working class latinx and asian immigrant community; historically black and latinx red hook; socioeconomically mixed kensington and gowanus; and increasingly wealthy and white areas like park slope and cobble hill (osman, 2011; wxy, 2018). the district educates around 30,000 students, mostly pre k through 8th grade, about 6300 of whom attend one of eleven district middle schools (new york state education department, 2022). the district is somewhat more white and less poor than the city as a whole, and many of its neighborhoods have experienced increased gentrification in recent decades, which is reflected in a student population that has become more white and relatively affluent and less black over time (nyc open data, 2022). for a demographic profile of district 15’s middle schools alongside those of brooklyn and across the nycdoe, see fig. 1. racial and socioeconomic composition of middle school students in district 15, brooklyn, and new york city, 2017 2018. source: district 15 data from wxy studio, “d15 diversity plan final report”, 2018; brooklyn data from data.nysed.gov, “kings county public school enrollment (2017 2018); new york city data from open data, "2013 2014 2017 2018 demographic snapshot citywide” while some of district 15’s neighborhoods are well known enclaves of both political liberalism and significant wealth, they are also regularly critiqued as communities that profess progressive values but perpetuate existing inequities (louis, 2017; schwartz, 2019). prior to adopting controlled choice for middle school, district 15 had the second highest within district economic segregation among the fifty largest districts in new york state (margolis, et al., 2020) and one of the highest inter school dissimilarity indices of race and class in the city meaning that individual schools’ racial and class compositions were dissimilar from the district as a whole (wxy, 2018). in other words, while few district 15 schools were racially homogenous, almost none reflected the demographics of the district. this phenomenon was particularly evident in the district’s middle schools, which were individually far less diverse than the district’s student population as a whole. as detailed in table 1, in 2017, three district 15 middle schools colloquially called the “big 3” for their perceived elite status enrolled most (by some estimates 80 percent) of the district’s white students, and the smallest percentage of students from low income families (viega, 2016). this was because prior to controlled choice, students were admitted to middle schools in district 15 through a competitive process in which families were required to rank their school preferences and schools in high demand could select students based on an assortment of criteria such as grades, test scores, auditions, and attendance records. the result of this competitive system was that the big 3 were not only disproportionately white and relatively affluent compared to the district as a whole, but they also had the district’s highest test score averages (wall, 2016) and sent a disproportionate number of graduates to new york city’s most exclusive public high schools (mader et al., 2016). meanwhile at some of district 15’s other middle schools, only ten percent of students were white and over 80 percent were from low income families (wall, 2016). although the competitive choice system disproportionately benefited advantaged families, a significant and growing constituency of white and/or economically advantaged parents opposed the system arguing that it was not only unfair to less advantaged students, but also anxiety inducing and stressful for their own children (savitch lew, 2018). additionally, with growing gentrification, access to the big 3 was becoming increasingly competitive. as one parent activist in favor of reform explained to a reporter, “there just aren’t enough seats for all the smart rich kids to get into the smart rich kid schools” (shapiro, 2018). this mounting frustration and community activism, combined with a growing awareness citywide that new york city schools were some of the most segregated in the nation (kucsera & orfield, 2014), led the nycdoe to initiate a community planning process in the fall of 2017 with the goal of replacing district 15’s middle school admissions system with something more equitable and more popular. the ultimate result of that planning process was the adoption of a controlled choice model for middle school admissions, officially termed the middle school “diversity plan,” to begin in the fall of 2019. this new admissions system still required parents to rank their preferred middle schools, but instead of allowing schools to in turn select or “screen” potential students, placement in popular schools was determined through lottery. moreover, the preferences of students from low income families, as well as those identified as english language learners and/or living in temporary housing, received lottery priority for the majority of seats in each school (nyc office of the mayor, 2018). in addition to adopting the weighted lottery, the nycdoe also agreed to several other policy interventions intended to address school based sources of educational inequality and segregation, including support and training for culturally responsive and anti racist pedagogy, expansion of restorative justice programs, improved information dissemination about middle school options, and the provision of free transportation to facilitate access (wxy, 2018).1 district 15 middle school level characteristics, 2017 2018 source: open data, “2013 2014 2017 2018 demographic snapshot citywide although it was met with some dissension and dire predictions, district 15’s controlled choice model was generally well received and quickly implemented (markowicz, 2018; nyc office of the mayor, 2018; shapiro, 2019; veiga & zimmer, 2019; welch, 2019). it is too early to assess how the reform has impacted students’ experiences and learning outcomes questions complicated by the global pandemic, which interrupted regular schooling for several years. however, the demographic effect was immediate. the first year of controlled choice radically changed the racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic composition of most 6th grade classes in the district: eight out of eleven schools met the reform’s diversity targets, while only three had done so under the previous admissions model. in addition, overall economic and racial segregation for 6th graders decreased by 55 and 38 percent, respectively, while the demographic composition of the student population remained relatively constant. that is, at least pre pandemic, there was little discernible “flight” from the district’s middle schools (margolis et al., 2020; veiga & zimmer, 2019). this study draws on a subset of interviews conducted with parents who participated in district 15’s middle school admissions process during the winter and spring of 2021, in the third year of controlled choice. our larger project was designed as a follow up to a previous study on how parents experienced competitive school choice within district 15 (kafka, 2022). while the original study included parents from diverse socioeconomic, racial, ethnic, linguistic and geographic identities and locations, the covid 19 pandemic severely limited our ability to recruit a similarly diverse parent population for this study. specifically, because we conducted most of our study recruitment online (via social media, email lists, online parent groups, etc.), our “convenience sampling” (yin, 2011) resulted in a participant pool of disproportionately well educated and highly engaged parents who were “advantaged” in that they did not qualify for the district’s middle school lottery priority. the characteristics of our research participants thus informed the focus of this study.2 as a group they are emblematic of the population the controlled choice model depends upon for political support and longevity. although we also interviewed a small number (3) of low income parents for this study, along with two advantaged parents who opposed the reform outright, in this article we focus on the experiences and perspectives of sixteen advantaged district 15 parents who expressed support for the new middle school reform. all of the parents in this subset of sixteen were mothers, which was unsurprising given women’s role in school choice work (brown, 2022; kimelberg, 2014); almost all had a college degree; and none qualified for the district’s lottery priority. yet this subset of mothers were also somewhat racially, ethnically and economically diverse: four participants identified as latina, two as asian/pacific islander and one as black. their incomes ranged from just over the limit to qualify for free or reduced priced lunch to well over $200,000 a year, and they were geographically dispersed across the district (see table 2 below). characteristics of study group note: all participants identified as women note: this article includes sixteen of twenty one study participants note: in 2019, the average household income in new york city was $83,160 (american community survey) we used a longitudinal design to capture parents’ views of the district 15 controlled choice model for middle school admissions by conducting semi structured interviews both during the process and after they had received their child’s school assignment. this design also allowed us to ask clarifying and follow up questions, and to identify parents’ shifting views over time (mcleod, 2003). our research team asked parents questions about how they navigated the admissions process, how they developed their school preferences, how they ultimately ranked their school options and why, and how they felt about the process both as they were experiencing it and once they received their child’s school assignment [see “appendix” for interview protocols]. these interviews ranged from thirteen to ninety seven minutes; most first interviews lasted around forty minutes while second interviews averaged 20 min in length. we interviewed two parents a third time one because she contacted us after receiving a preferred placement off of the waitlist, and another because we had additional clarifying questions about her family’s middle school enrollment decision. all interviews were conducted via video conferencing or phone, based on participants’ preference, and were recorded and professionally transcribed. most of our analysis is based on parent interviews, but we also draw from media, research reports, and school level data available from the nyc doe. in addition, both authors are research “insiders” whose knowledge, experience and perspectives inform this study. one of us has researched district 15 middle school admissions and the diversity reform for several years (kafka, 2022), the other previously served as a parent representative in the district. both authors are white, advantaged parents who participated in district 15 middle school admissions for their own children (one in the first year of controlled choice and one during competitive admissions). our research team also included two graduate students one who identifies as a second generation bilingual columbian and early childhood teacher and mother, and another who is a white man and, at the time we conducted our research, was a new york city public school teacher. we employed a constructivist grounded theory approach in our data collection and analysis, beginning with analytic memos after each interview, which we used to develop initial thematic codes and to raise additional research questions (thornberg & charmaz, 2014). as a team of four we built on that early analysis by reading and discussing the first round of transcribed interviews, refining our themes and additional questions, and then repeating the cycle for the second round of interviews. this layered and iterative process resulted in the authors eventually developing three types of codes that we applied to all interview transcripts using dedoose software: in vivo codes based on research participants’ own language (e.g., “back up plans,” “benefits of diversity”), values codes based on themes identified through earlier analysis (e.g. “implied race/ethnicity,” “limits to diversity”) and descriptive codes related to our initial research questions about how and why parents arrived at their middle school preferences (e.g., “sources of information,” “priorities”) (saldaña, 2016). we employed a norming process to ensure inter researcher reliability and to refine, redefine, and ultimately collapse many of our codes. the subset of parents we discuss in this article all articulated some degree of support for district 15’s middle school admissions reform. they believed the controlled choice model benefited their children and families while also serving the broader goals of social justice, equity and desegregation. however, because the controlled choice model situates parents as shoppers in an educational marketplace, these same parents responded to the reform through an individualist lens. as other ethnographic work with advantaged parents in diverse, urban school districts has found, parents in our study spent significant time and effort identifying schools they understood to be a “good enough” fit for their children (cucchiara, 2013). in addition to learning about available choices in virtual tours and from online sources, these mothers consulted with other parents they perceived as “like them” in terms of racial and class background to rank order their preferred schools. although they reported building a wider set of choices than they may have otherwise created under the competitive admissions model, most parents in this article also identified a small subset of schools they considered unacceptable for their children characterizations usually rooted in racialized and class based perceptions of school quality. the advantaged parents we spoke to, across racial and ethnic identities, either implicitly or explicitly associated academic success with white children and children from middle  or upper class families. while these parents were often critical of the segregation that had occurred with screened admissions, many nonetheless perpetuated its logic of pathology and assumed that poor, mostly black and latinx students who received priority in the new weighted lottery system were less academically capable or prepared, and that schools that continued to enroll large majorities of latinx students were less academically rigorous (freidus, 2022). for some, class was a way to avoid speaking directly about race or ethnicity. but other parents acknowledged that they didn’t believe their children would “fit” in schools where the student population was predominantly poor and latinx. thus, for many of the advantaged mothers in our study, their support for the district 15 reform was contingent on the results of the lottery for their individual child. the sixteen mothers we focus on in this article all had a generally positive view of the new middle school admissions process. they expressed relief that their children would not have to compete to access a good school and believed that lottery based admissions was more fair than the previous system. these mothers also all expressed support for the broader goal of school “diversity,” believing that their children would benefit from learning in a diverse setting and that reduced school segregation would lead to greater educational equity and improved outcomes for disadvantaged children in the district. parents overwhelmingly believed that while still time consuming and stressful, applying to middle school through a lottery was less anxiety inducing and more fair than the previous system, which had required children to compete for admission to their preferred schools. this was true of both parents who had participated in the previous system with an older child and of parents applying to middle schools for the first time. diana, for example, an affluent black mother, explained that she was initially frustrated with lottery based admissions, but that after viewing some postings in parent message boards from the previous system she changed her mind: just the stress and the idea that, “oh, my kid, they got good grades. we dragged him or her to school with sickness and no absences. and after all that, we didn’t get a spot. and my kid feels stupid.”... so, the parents feel bad. and so, actually, i prefer not having that pressure. diana was one of many parents we interviewed who referenced what was believed to have been a widespread practice under competitive admissions that of parents sending their children to school while sick to avoid absences. while it is unclear how common the practice was, parents, school and city leaders, and local media often referenced the idea that parents would send their children to school ill as evidence of the many harms caused by competitive school admissions (shapiro, 2020). other first time parents shared diana’s views of the district’s previous admissions system, describing it as “cruel” or “oppressive,” especially for children with fewer advantages than their own. susan, for example, a white single mother with an advanced degree, explained that in previous years children who may have had “something … going on in the household” that resulted in them arriving late to school, wouldn’t “get to go to a good middle school,” adding: “that never made any sense to me.” hillary, an upper middle class white mother, described the previous competitive system as “dirty” and argued that it reinforced a sense of entitlement amongst the already advantaged: people were like, “well, but we paid really good money to live here, and we’ve worked really hard to make sure our kids have perfect attendance, and why should my kids suffer?” and i would be like, “what are you talking [about]? … and how are you teaching a 7 year old, 8 year old, 9 year old that they deserve this based on where they live and the income of their family?” and these parents were doing pretty shitty stuff. like, they were bringing their kids to school sick, and then they would take them out at the end of first period so that they wouldn’t get an absence and they wouldn’t be late, right? to hillary, the old system reinforced inequalities and promoted bad behavior on the part of advantaged families, while the weighted lottery made the process both easier and more fair. parents who had experienced the competitive admissions system with an older child agreed. for instance, camila, an affluent stay at home puerto rican mother of three, had already gone through middle school admissions with her two older children. her eldest had not been admitted to any of his first choices through competitive admissions an experience she described as “devastating” for the family. beyond the injury she felt for her own child, camila also questioned the legitimacy of a system that allowed schools to choose students. she argued that some of the so called “best” schools were “just lopping from the top and didn’t have to teach kids, and all they had to do was … just throw the information at them and because they were the top kids, they’ll just get it,” which she found “infuriating.” camila further explained her support for the new admissions system by noting that “families who have children who are neurodiverse … were not served at all with the prior system. not at all. and unless you are a person of means, it was game over.” under the new reform, all schools were expected to meet the educational needs of all students, which camila felt was both more just and would force middle schools across the district to teach more effectively. parents like camila, who felt harmed by the prior system, were particularly likely to support the district’s middle school admissions reform, but many advantaged parents whose children had benefited from the old system also supported the new weighted lottery. joanne, for instance, an affluent white mother, preferred lottery based middle school admissions, even though her eldest had been admitted to her first choice middle school through the competitive process. when asked about the new admissions model, joanne responded: “i think it's great … i really feel like middle school is a chance for them to really learn how to be a student, and the idea of the auditions to me just made no sense in middle school.” in joanne’s view, eliminating auditions was a benefit of the reform because she felt that 5th grade children, who are still early in their academic development, should not have to compete or develop specialized skills for admission to middle school. in addition to feeling that the lottery was more fair and less stressful than competitive admissions had been, these advantaged mothers also saw school desegregation as a valuable goal. while believing that their children would benefit by learning in a more diverse environment, some also used what freidus (2022) calls the “braided discourses of pathology and diversity” to explain how poor children and the schools they had typically attended would benefit even more from access to better opportunities and more diverse student populations (p.1). joanne, for example, maintained that increased student diversity would be good for all children, but she was also one of many advantaged parents we interviewed across racial backgrounds who emphasized that previously racially and economically segregated schools, and the children who had historically attended them, had the most to gain from the reform. as she explained: “my hope is that this is going to bring up some of the schools that just had troubles in the past or just didn't have students that were motivated in school.” in assuming that previously segregated schools needed to be “brought up” and that the children who attended them were unmotivated, joanne frames school quality as a function of proximity to affluence and whiteness. joanne’s framing also alludes to the way that the previous admissions system concentrated high achieving students into a small set of schools. she was one of many study participants who used terms like “unmotivated” or “struggling” to refer to students who would not have been admitted to the big 3 under the previous admissions system. in doing so, these mothers rarely mentioned students’ race, ethnicity, or class; instead they used race neutral language provided by a system that had long relied on academic stratification to structure school segregation. other parents believed that one of the benefits of the new admissions system was that it would explicitly disrupt this race and class based perception of school (and student) quality. diana, for instance, explained that one of the reasons she supported the new admissions system was that she felt ensuring that all schools were “more representative of the community as a whole” was preferable to a system that allowed some schools to become “coveted” while “schools that are a majority black and hispanic are described as low performing.” as an affluent black woman whose child attended an elementary school with few other black students, diana was aware of the race neutral language white parents often used to describe segregated schools, noting that while she had heard that some of the district schools were “under resourced,” after attending virtual tours she concluded: “there weren’t schools, from my perspective, that were lacking with resources …they just offered different things and also different demographics.” thus diana maintained that the lottery would not just equalize access to schools perceived as high performing, but, in ensuring that all middle schools were demographically reflective of the district, would disentangle race and class from notions of school quality. many parents also argued that the controlled choice model would help to equalize resources across district 15 middle schools not in terms of formal school funding, but based on the idea that affluent families bring with them access to all kinds of supplementary resources and fundraising abilities. hillary, for example, the white mother who had called competitive admissions “dirty,” tied the benefits of desegregating the district’s middle schools explicitly to the resources advantaged parents presumably brought to previously segregated settings: what i’ve seen in the last couple of years is a lot of schools that weren’t considered as high ranked … but now, we have all of these very active parents in there that are doing fundraising, that are doing specialty things, that are bringing in groups. just as joanne assumed that schools that weren’t “high ranked” needed to be “brought up” with more motivated students, hillary assumed that these same schools benefited from the additional resources “active” affluent parents could access. at the same time, however, hillary acknowledged that this assumption could be problematic: on the one hand, it’s really complex because you really don’t want white rich families going into schools and coming in and being like, “i’m bringing you all this money,” but on the other hand, you need that money because that’s the only way… hillary was not the only parent torn between the belief that wealthier families’ access to resources could benefit previously segregated schools and a concern that such families’ sense of entitlement could also be harmful to the school community. for instance, isabella, a latina mother with an advanced degree who grew up in sunset park, a neighborhood with a large latinx and asian immigrant population, and was now raising her family there, was similarly conflicted. on the one hand, isabella critiqued the notion that the presence of white affluent families would lead to improved school quality: somehow the children from the affluent neighborhoods   in this case, i’m speaking specifically of the caucasian children   are somehow coming in with some sort of magical pixie dust that they’re gonna rub off on these kids, and then that’s gonna make them succeed? that’s the logic? at the same time, however, isabella had chosen to send her own children to a diverse elementary school outside of sunset park in order to access what she believed were superior educational opportunities: “i didn’t want them to go to the neighborhood school… i’m gonna follow where the resources are, i’m gonna follow where the interesting pedagogy is gonna be.” and she believed white affluent families would bring crucial resources to previously segregated schools in her neighborhood, provided they were willing to send their children there: “well, if we get the people from the affluent neighborhoods, well, then they’ll fundraise the way that we don’t, because in sunset park, we’re baking cookies, we’re doing potlucks. we’re not doing $50,000, $60,000 a month fundraising.” isabella, an advantaged latina mother, also believed that the new admissions system would likely benefit her children, explaining: “i’m going to benefit, i would think, in that the schools in the affluent neighborhoods are gonna be more welcoming to take in black or brown children. i happen to have those children.” although her perspective as an advantaged latina mother from sunset park was different in many ways from that of white affluent mothers living in some of the wealthiest neighborhoods in brooklyn, like them isabella viewed the new admissions system as a “win win” for her family and potentially for educational equity. parents’ support for district 15’s middle school reform was aided by their belief that there were plenty of “good” middle schools in the district, and thus most did not perceive the new admissions system as limiting their children’s educational opportunities (learned miller, 2016). leslie, for instance, an upper middle class mother who identified as pacific islander, explained that district 15 was known for having good schools: “we're better off than other districts in the city. so, i guess i'm grateful for that. i have friends in other districts that don’t have as much selection.” isabella agreed: “for the most part, schools are pretty good in district 15, so there’s not a whole lot to worry about.” june, an affluent white mother, explained that she had moved to district 15 because of both the quality of its middle schools and its new admissions process, which she believed made it easier to access those good options. in the neighboring brooklyn district where they had previously lived, june said, there were only a few “good” middle schools and they “were just kind of really hard to get into. there didn’t seem like there was that much chance.” so, june explained, “i really liked what i was hearing about the diversity plan … we moved to the district for the quality of the schools, and for the diversity plan.” june’s explanation for why her family moved into district 15 underscores how the controlled choice model embodied interest convergence for the advantaged parents in this study: they liked that their children would not have to compete to access a good school; they believed their children would benefit from learning in a diverse setting; and they assumed that the reform would lead to greater educational equity and improved outcomes for other, disadvantaged children in the district. a rich body of research has documented the ways that middle and upper middle class parents rely on social networks as sources of information about their school options especially in the context of gentrifying urban districts in which parents are trying to balance their “progressive” and pro diversity values against their perceptions of the risks involved in sending their children to schools where they will be in the racial/ethnic and socioeconomic minority (andré bechely, 2005; kafka, 2022; butler, 2022; cucchiara & horvat, 2014; freidus, 2019; pearman & swain, 2017; roda & wells, 2013). in the context of district 15’s controlled choice model, in which parents were required to rank order their preferred middle school options for a weighted lottery, advantaged parents who generally supported the reform responded by developing larger and more inclusive “choice sets” that is, the subset of schools they considered within the realm of possibility for their children (bell, 2009) than they may have created under the previous system. in this way, information via social networks (often accessed through facebook and other social media outlets during the pandemic) both contributed to and undermined the goal of the reform. on the one hand parents reported adding more schools, and schools they were less familiar with, to their choice sets, disregarding the idea of a so called “big 3” and often expressing optimism that their children would fare well and/or be “happy” in a variety of school settings (debs et al., 2023). at the same time, however, social networks helped to reinforce the perception that some of the district’s historically most segregated middle schools especially the two located in sunset park, which continued to serve a mostly poor population were not appropriate options for their advantaged children. for many mothers in our study, hearing positive reviews of schools they considered “unknown” or previously “low ranked” from parents they perceived to be like themselves allayed concerns they may have had about the lottery process. stacie, a white upper middle class mother, explained that hearing from parents of alumni at her child’s elementary school that “even though we got our ninth choice, we’re, actually, still very happy and happier than we might have been had we gotten to our first choice,” gave her confidence that her child would be fine at most of district 15’s schools. diana made a similar observation: my focus had been on schools that i was going to rank lower but i wanted to be informed just to make sure i wasn’t … like, “oh, my god, my life is over [if] he gets assigned [there].” and everyone i spoke to was positive…so, that was something that comforted me in that it seemed like families who took a shot … they were happy. both stacie, who is white, and diana, who is black, were seeking assurance from other similarly advantaged parents who, in diana’s words, “took a shot” in sending their children to a school that they would not have considered prior to the controlled choice reform. other mothers were more explicit in wanting to hear about the experiences of similarly racially and socioeconomically situated parents as they investigated their school options. june, for instance, the affluent white mother whose family moved into the district for access to its middle schools, explained that hearing positive feedback about a middle school in sunset park from another white parent who lived in a wealthy neighborhood led her to list the school higher on her list (6th) than she had initially planned: there were people talking on [the facebook group] about this   there was a woman who was really promoting [this school], for example. she was this white woman from cobble hill who sent her son [there] and loved it and was talking about it. and i had conversations with her directly, chatting about it. and so that was super helpful to be like, “okay, there are people who’ve had this really great experience. it’s not just that the school presents well, but people outside the neighborhood who have more resources, whatever, have had a good experience at this school.” so, that was why we put it higher in the end. here june is very clear that after becoming interested in a school that had enrolled few white students prior to the reform, she sought out assurance from a mother who was similar to her in terms of race and resources before feeling confident that the school could be an option for her child. sometimes, hearing positive views from others led parents to completely change their mind about a school. olivia, for example, a white affluent mother, initially characterized her child’s assignment at their last choice school as “a huge disappointment.” olivia had already been somewhat concerned about district 15’s middle school reform in that she believed the “big 3” school her eldest had attended was now lowering academic standards to “adapt to the new clientele.” thus olivia had developed a back up plan, or contingency, by applying to both charter and private school options, despite “believ[ing] in public education.” yet, although her child was offered a place at a charter school that olivia considered “very good,” and was admitted to a private catholic school that olivia liked, in the end her family decided to try the district 15 school they had been assigned a school known for its social justice orientation and collaborative pedagogical model and had enrolled a disproportionately poor and non white student population prior to the reform. olivia explained, “interestingly, the more we found out about [the school], the more we heard good things about it.” she continued: “when we found out, a lot of people were like, “oh, my god! this is a great school. oh, wow! you're so lucky. this was one of my top three choices.” and i was like, “really?” i knew absolutely zero about it.” olivia added that her child would have several friends at the school, which they considered a positive, and that the school’s location near their home was another plus. olivia’s family’s change of heart illustrates the positive effect that word of mouth in a controlled choice model can yield: as they received assurance from other advantaged parents, families in our study expanded their choice sets to include schools that were previously racially and socioeconomically segregated, and in doing so ultimately supported the goal of school desegregation. however, word of mouth worked both ways. advantaged parents also shared negative perceptions via social networks, leading some mothers in our study to reject the district’s most segregated schools as options for their own children. this underscores the limits of interest convergence via market based strategies for school reform, as some advantaged parents viewed their children’s assignment at particular middle schools as contrary to their individual interests. although parents in this study generally considered the district 15 controlled choice reform beneficial to both their own families and the broader goals of social justice, for many their favorable view of the weighted lottery was contingent on their child being assigned to a school they considered acceptable. this perspective is consistent with their role as consumers in a market based model of school assignment, and meant that even some mothers who articulated strong support for the new middle school admissions system acknowledged that their individual interests could diverge from the policy’s goals of desegregation and educational equity. parents’ explanations for why they eliminated specific schools from their children’s choice sets varied. but consistently, parents used class based or racialized narratives to explain why a rejected school (usually those that had historically served black and latinx students) was not suitable for their child, either socially or academically. sometimes they shared negative perceptions of a school’s culture and its student population, mentioning a building’s use of metal detectors, for example, or referring to a school as “demographically rough.” other times parents were more specific. for instance, susan, a white mother, explained her negative perception of a large middle school near her home that had enrolled few white students prior to controlled choice: every day, every day   i'm embarrassed to say this   i heard the n word, and i just didn’t   i don’t want him to go to an n word school. it's just not   that doesn’t sound like a good place to me. i just wanted to avoid it. and we've talked about it, and he knows   he's scared of   it just didn’t seem like a good thing… we live on the block that the kids have to walk. so, we were always walking with kids. i mean, i swear to god; for five years, i have heard that word, and they were always [from that school].” susan did not explain how she identified which middle school the children she observed using the “n word” attended especially given that the school in question shares a building with another middle school. yet susan made clear that she was uncomfortable with her child, whom she described as multiracial with an asian father, attending a school where (presumably) black or latinx middle school students casually used the n word. from this observation, susan extrapolated that the school was not a “good place” generally, and was not an appropriate setting for her child. other parents, across racial backgrounds, offered different, but still race and class based narratives when explaining why they eliminated a school from their choice sets. camila, for instance, whose children attended one of the wealthiest elementary schools in the district, was explicit about not wanting her child to be the “only one” attending a particular school: i don’t know anybody there. i feel like she would be the only kid … last year, i remember families who got in … didn’t send their kids there. so, there's just still no kids [from her daughter’s school]. and whenever you go on the tour where the parents talk about the school, that's the one school where there's no kids from our community there. so, i don’t wanna send her to be the pioneer. camila, who identified herself as puerto rican and her children as “mixed,” used the term “community” to encapsulate both geographic and demographic reasons why she rejected this particular middle school for her child. her use of the term “pioneer” evokes the racialized narratives of the american west and gentrification, implying that affluent families would need to invest time and effort into the school in order to make it more comfortable and appealing for others like themselves. while some parents maintained that the neighborhood where this school was located sunset park would prove a difficult commute for their children, camila did not. in fact, she listed schools much further from her home and with longer commutes (including schools in other districts) on her child’s application. camila’s outright rejection of the sunset park school was based on her perception that other advantaged students would not enroll there, reinforcing the notion that it was not an appropriate setting for her own child. diana was even more explicit in rejecting a school located in sunset park based on the racial composition of its student population, although her perspective was particular to her experience as a black parent. diana reported that she had initially considered the school an option because she appreciated what she called the administration’s “hustle.” however, after talking to another black mother who had witnessed an anti black incident while touring the school pre pandemic, diana changed her mind: “when she told me that, i was reminded how for my black kid, i don’t want them to be the only one.” diana’s concern about her son’s potential experience at the school in question was specifically about how its community treats black students (posey maddox et al., 2021). yet her desire for him not to be the “only one” was part of a larger pattern we observed of advantaged parents of all backgrounds rejecting this school in particular because of their fear that no one else “like them” would send their children there. for most parents, eliminating one or two schools from their choice sets still gave them many middle school options and did not conflict with their overall support for the reform. indeed the large majority of parents in this subset of our study received middle school placements they deemed acceptable, or, in the case of olivia, was subsequently convinced by others that her initial impression of a school was mistaken. thus while for many parents in our study there was a possibility that their individual interests could diverge from the goals of the middle school admissions reform, that potential was only realized when parents were both displeased with the school their children had been assigned and had an alternative option. courtney, for example, an affluent white mother, said she would have happily sent her child to any of their top five options. but when her child was offered a seat at a school further down her ranked list, they opted for private school instead. interestingly, courtney’s child was assigned to the same school as olivia’s. while the opinions of other parents in her social network contributed to olivia’s eventual conclusion that the school could provide a positive educational experience for her child, courtney maintained that the school was unprepared for high achieving children like hers: i just got the impression that that school’s priority or sort of the majority of the students that they’ve… traditionally worked with in the past, are kids who sort of fall into the other bucket of “i struggled,” or, “i’m not sure that i’m motivated.” she elaborated: i just feel like some schools are probably more equipped to [to teach high performing students] than others either because those schools have always traditionally been a highly selective school whose had a certain kind of kid go there and know how to work with those kind of kids. or you have the opposite, where you’d had kids who are a lot of english language learners and have really struggled or whatever and that’s your core knowledge base of how to work with those kinds of kids. courtney’s characterization of the school as best prepared to meet the needs of “struggling” students or english language learners seems to be based on racial and class based assumptions about the student population, which prior to the reform had enrolled few white students. in rejecting the school as an option for her child, courtney also rejected the weighted lottery that had led to her child’s assignment there, stating: “any control that you have in this whole process is your ability to make this list. that’s the only control you have is your ranking.” although courtney professed support for desegregated middle schools, that support was contingent on her daughter being assigned to what she perceived as a “top” school. when that did not occur, courtney no longer viewed the controlled choice reform as serving her family’s interests or the interests of the wider community, ultimately arguing that “this desire to make a fair and equitable experience, i still think it’s not fair and equitable.” diverging interests were most evident when parents exited the system. four families in this subgroup of 16 ultimately enrolled their children in private school a rate likely heightened by the relative affluence of parents in this subgroup and their high level engagement in the school choice process. while the remaining 12 families sent their children to a district 15 middle school, we found that many had developed back up plans in case their children were assigned to a school they ultimately viewed as unacceptable. for most of these parents, their “plan b” involved applying to private schools (if they had the financial means) and charter schools (which used their own lotteries). as olivia observed during the admissions process, “i feel like a lot of people like us, before would not have considered private schools. and now we are … which is a shame.” although olivia ultimately chose to keep her child in a district 15 middle school, her support for controlled choice remained contingent on her satisfaction as a consumer in the school marketplace. this article used the lenses of interest convergence and market theory to examine the contradictions at the heart of white and other socioeconomically advantaged parents’ response to a controlled choice school assignment model intended to desegregate middle schools in brooklyn’s district 15. it contributes to the significant body of research in urban sociology and urban education that examines how white and socioeconomically advantaged parents participate in and affect urban school systems (posey maddox, et al., 2014). much of that research identifies the tension between white parents’ espoused desire for diversity and their actual behaviors and choices (evans, 2021; hailey, 2022; roda & wells, 2013). district 15’s controlled choice admissions system, on the other hand, operates in an apparent “win win” situation in its relatively successful effort to equalize access to and desegregate its middle schools. yet as cucchiara (2013) reminds us, “while the image of urban schools serving racially and economically integrated student populations is greatly appealing, how we get to that place demands far greater consideration than it is typically given" (p 10 11). our study explored how advantaged parents who expressed support for controlled choice and its equity related goals perceived and experienced the initiative when applying for middle schools for their own children. we found that parents’ positive view of the reform was largely based on their belief that it benefited both their families and contributed to educational equity and social justice. advantaged parents’ support for controlled choice was aided by three crucial factors at the intersection of interest convergence and market based reform: their belief that the previous competitive admissions system both created stress and anxiety for families like theirs and perpetuated educational inequalities; their confidence that most middle schools in the district were “good enough”; and a conviction that integrated schools were better for society than segregated ones. the mothers we discuss here did not experience the internal values conflict that researchers have identified among advantaged parents in other school choice contexts, in which parents have felt that choosing for civic values and commitments to social justice put them at odds with what was best for their own children (butler, 2022; cucchiara, 2013; roda & wells, 2013). but advantaged parents’ support for controlled choice in this study was often contingent on the results of the lottery; many had back up plans in case they were unhappy with the school to which their child was assigned. our analysis helps explain the broad “success” of district 15’s controlled choice school reform (in that almost all of its middle schools now reflect the demographic composition of the district as a whole), while also illuminating the limitations of a market based strategy for achieving educational equity. any policy that seeks reform through interest convergence must, by definition, offer some kind of benefit to those with relative advantage. controlled choice, however, locates the realization of that benefit (or its perceived absence) with individual families; in this sense the contingency we observed within general support for district 15’s middle school reform among advantaged families was built into the initiative’s design. as long as parents are asked to view schooling as a consumer good and to participate as shoppers in an educational marketplace, some will feel that they and their children have “lost” an educational opportunity that others have gained. from a policy perspective a certain amount of dissatisfaction among relatively advantaged families may be sustainable particularly if most parents are reasonably satisfied and the reform leads to greater educational equity overall. whether district 15’s controlled choice middle school admissions model will achieve this goal remains to be seen. while nine of the district’s eleven middle schools have reached the reform’s diversity targets, we have little sense of whether true integration has occurred within school buildings or whether students and families who had been systematically excluded from many district middle schools under competitive admissions are now accessing better quality learning opportunities. it will be difficult to separate the effects of district 15’s middle school reform from the effects of the covid 19 pandemic and the so called “learning loss” that may have occurred as the result of school closures, online learning, and the general instability, displacement, and loss of life that students experienced over the past few years. yet we hope future research successfully gauges how the controlled choice model has impacted students' middle school experiences, and specifically whether it has benefited poor families and students beyond making formerly exclusive schools more accessible. the specific context of our study also raises additional questions for researchers and policymakers interested in exploring controlled choice as a tool for promoting educational equity. first, while district 15 is racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse, its black population is relatively small and, as a result of both gentrification and an expanding charter school sector, has decreased in recent years. thus while many advantaged parents in this study made racial and class based assumptions about school and student deficits and pathologies, the small number of black students in the district may play a role in advantaged parents’ openness to a wider set of schools than may occur in districts with proportionally larger black populations (evans, 2021; posey maddox et al., 2021). whether similarly positioned advantaged parents would be as supportive of a controlled choice model replacing competitive admissions in cities and school districts with larger black populations is a question for future research. second, the covid 19 pandemic impacted parents’ ability to access information about their middle school options during the time of our study. parents couldn’t visit schools in person; state tests were not administered so there were no scores to compare; popular school ratings websites like insideschools.org and greatschools.org were not updated post reform; and all the media attention once directed at district 15 middle schools switched focus to the pandemic. thus while we know that advantaged parents often rely on social networks in making school choices even when an abundance of data is available, we don’t know how parents would have responded differently to the new admissions system if they’d had access to more robust and up to date information about their school options. moreover, while few of the advantaged parents we interviewed mentioned the absence of test score data, parent surveys, or information on the demographic composition of the schools, many expressed disappointment about the absence of in person tours and were openly skeptical of the information provided on virtual school open houses. future research could explore how parents respond to controlled choice models and construct their choice sets when they have access to more information and data about their options. finally and most crucially, a more robust understanding of controlled choice as a strategy for school desegregation and educational equity requires the viewpoints, experiences, and responses of non advantaged families. while we did interview three parents whose families qualified for the district 15 lottery priority as part of our study, we chose not to include their voices in this article because we found it narratively impossible to do so without inappropriately casting their quite disparate backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives as representative of a large and diverse constituency. yet we acknowledge that we cannot understand the results of controlled choice in district 15 in which all but the two middle schools located in sunset park have met the district’s diversity enrollment targets without knowing more about those experiences and perspectives. as an example of market based interest convergence, district 15’s controlled choice model suggests cause for both cautious optimism and tempered pessimism. as bell (1980) observed decades ago, even parents who value school integration may value other educational components more, and those with other educational options may seize them if and when they perceive their individual interests diverging from those of the broader reform. in this sense, any market based model is limited in its ability to secure long term educational equity when parents are encouraged to make individual consumer choices. at the same time, however, prioritizing the preferences of district 15’s disadvantaged families for a majority of placements in each middle school has served to interrupt advantaged families’ ability to hoard educational access and resources in ways that many advantaged families themselves prefer. thus while the individualistic mechanism of controlled choice may necessarily limit its potential to bring about real racial and socioeconomic equity, the existence of inclusive, pedagogically sound, academically rich and socially and emotionally supportive schools and classrooms may also help to dismantle dominant notions about the relationship between race, class and school quality that advantaged families often rely on to navigate educational markets. we thank patrick buzzell and mariatere tapias for their research and insights on this project. alisha butler, molly makris, and emily miller provided helpful feedback on earlier versions of this manuscript. where does your child currently attend school? how long has s/he attend this school? how would you describe it? have you been happy with the school as a parent? how does your child feel about the school? tell me about your experience applying to middle school for your 5th grader. how did you learn about the process? as a parent, what are your priorities for your child’s middle school? did you get the sense that any of the schools in the district meet your criteria? what do you think your child’s priorities are for middle school? do you know if any schools in the district meet his or her criteria? what middle schools did you list on your application and in what order? how did you arrive at this list? how likely do you think it is that your child will be admitted to his/her first choice? second choice? what factors do you think will affect his or her assignment? what factors do you think should affect his or her assignment? were you happy with the array of the middle school choices available to you? if not, how so? how did you get your information about your middle school choices? do you feel adequately informed about your middle school choices? if not, what additional information do you wish you had? what are your worries and/or concerns about the middle school application process? how, if at all, do you feel the current pandemic affected the middle school admissions process for you? (if not already answered through other questions: who else is a member of your household? how many children are in your family and what are their ages? if you have one or more older children, what middle school does/did he/ she/they attend? where do you live, and if the elementary school your child currently attends is not the school you are zoned for, how did you end up at this other school? what is your highest level of education? what is the highest level of education of your partner or spouse (if applicable)? what is your occupation and/or the occupation of other parents responsible for this child? what is your household income level? what race and/or ethnicity do you identify as? what is the racial/ethnic identity of your child? also ask if parent is applying to charter and/or private schools if they don’t come up! also, if they don’t answer these questions organically, ask: for demographics if their child received special education (and, when appropriate, ell) services. did they consider racial/ethnic/economic demographics when choosing middle schools. did they use any online sources like greatschools or inside schools. how do they feel about the use of a lottery instead of competitive admissions; how they feel about the "preference" given to low income children for roughly 57% of the seats in any given school. looking back on the choice process, were you happy with the array of middle school choices available to you? (and why?) how would you describe your experience with the middle school application process? do you have any advice to the school district on ways to improve how students are assigned to middle schools in this district? things to add/tease out (tailored to the person): how did the information that you got from various sources help you set your rankings? for parents who attended zoom tours, can you tell me a little about your experience with them? what did you learn? was it useful? how so (or not)? what was it about school x, or y, etc. that led you to rank it where you did (for as many schools as they ranked)? students living more than a mile away from their middle schools can use the subway or public bus system for free; 6th graders also have the option of taking a free doe provided school bus. once local research regulations allowed, our research team did conduct some in person recruiting near elementary schools with large low income populations. these efforts resulted in a small number of additional study participants, including two parents who were interviewed in their native spanish language. all of our recruiting materials   both online and in person   were prepared in english, spanish, and mandarin, the three most common languages used by parents in the district. we initially interviewed all twenty two people who agreed to participate in our study; we had to exclude one parent’s interview from the data set because their children were not eligible to participate in district 15’s middle school admissions process. publisher's note springer nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. articles from the urban review are provided here courtesy of nature publishing group connect with nlm national library of medicine 8600 rockville pike bethesda, md 20894
newsletter district 15 dropped selective admissions for middle schools, and the schools are now more integrated than they were. by james barron today we’ll find out what happened when a school district in brooklyn began an ambitious effort to better integrate its middle schools. we’ll also find out about a decision throwing out an attempt by the city to ban foie gras. it’s been five years since district 15 in brooklyn adopted a plan to better integrate its middle schools, which were then among the most homogenous in the city. i asked troy closson, who covers education for the metro desk, to assess how the plan has worked out. district 15 in brooklyn dropped selective admissions and began giving every child a lottery number. what happened? before the pandemic, a handful of districts in new york city were thinking about disparities across schools in their areas and how they could address them through desegregation. in district 15, where that conversation had been going on for several years, parents decided to go further than anywhere else in the city, eliminating selective admissions for middle schools and setting high targets for the proportion of disadvantaged students that each school would enroll. at the time, there was a lot of support in district 15. but there was also concern that when districts try to desegregate, they run the risk that some families will be dissatisfied and that middle class families in particular will leave the school system.

 supported by a new report found that many schools enrolled more racially and socioeconomically diverse groups of students without sparking a major exodus of families from public schools. by troy closson seeking to solve a problem that has vexed public schools around the country for decades, one progressive section of new york undertook an ambitious plan to better integrate middle schools that were among the most homogenous in the city. selective admissions were scrapped. every child got a lottery number instead. schools adopted targets to admit certain numbers of disadvantaged children. and unlike in many places where integration attempts faced fierce opposition, parents led the effort. now, five years later, the plan appears to be working. middle schools in a section of northwest brooklyn that stretches from sunset park to cobble hill went from being the second most socioeconomically segregated to 19th out of the city’s 32 local districts. teachers and students say friendships are emerging across income lines.