Musk’s Friends and Fans Applaud Shareholder Vote on His Payday
On the social media platform X, which Mr. Musk owns, reactions to a vote that reaffirmed Mr. Musk’s $45 billion package were buoyant.
Supported byMusk’s Friends and Fans Applaud Shareholder Vote on His PaydayOn the social media platform X, which Mr. Musk owns, reactions to a vote that reaffirmed Mr. Musk’s $45 billion package were buoyant.ByEli TanReporting from San FranciscoTesla shareholders reaffirmed a pay award worth more than $45 billion for Elon Musk on Thursday, but before the announcement was made official at the company’s annual meeting in Austin, Texas, Mr. Musk posted the news on X, his social media platform.“Both Tesla shareholder resolutions are currently passing by wide margins!” hewrote in a postlate Wednesday night. “Thanks for your support!!”For months, Mr. Musk’s supporters have used the social media site, which he purchased for $44 billion in 2022, to drum up support for his massive payday, and Tesla board members warned he could leave the company if shareholders voted against him.But for some Tesla investors, Mr. Musk’s involvement with X has been the primary cause of concern, stirring complaints that the pay package has drawn his attention away from Tesla and into other ventures. Mr. Musk has also used the platform to promote right-wing conspiracy theories and vulgar content, offending some of his employees and investors.On X, shareholder approval of the pay package was met with praise from Mr. Musk’s legion of supporters — some cheering before the official vote was announced. They included retail investors, friends in the technology industry and media personalities.“Congrats on getting paid what you’re owed E!”wroteJason Calacanis, a prominent tech investor and podcast host who is close to Mr. Musk.“The most important message of the vote,”wroteAlex Voigt, a blogger and YouTube personality, “is that Elon knows now he has the support of 90% of retail investors and more than 73% of all shares, and that matters for him personally and for the future of Tesla.”“Means a lot,” Mr. Musk replied.“Looks like Tesla shareholders are approving Elon’s CEO package by a wide margin — good for them,” wrote Lulu Cheng Meservey, a tech executive with 80,000 followers on the platform. “People with actual skin in the game can see the business logic that a Delaware judge blinded by her personal agenda could not.”“The vast majority of Tesla shareholders approved Elon’s comp package in 2018 and have re-approved it now. An activist judge voided it for nothing. The trial lawyers who are asking for billions in fees should get nothing,”wroteDavid Sacks, a Silicon Valley tech investor, who is also close to Mr. Musk.Critics of Mr. Musk also chimed in, albeit in smaller numbers.“It’s official — Tesla shareholders are the stupidest humans to walk the face of the planet,” one poster wrote.But many Tesla shareholders who were critical of the pay package in the weeks leading up to the vote were mostly silent in the hours after the decision.Eli Tanis a reporter covering the technology industry and a member of the 2024-25Times Fellowshipclass, a program for journalists early in their careers.More about Eli Tan
[{"title": "Musk's Friends and Fans Applaud Shareholder Vote on His ...", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/13/business/tesla-elon-musk-vote-reaction.html"}, {"title": "Elon Musk's Friends and Fans Applaud Shareholder Vote on ...", "link": "https://www.teui.ca/ceuhtml/78r285876ced00/"}, {"title": "Musk's Friends and Fans Applaud Shareholder Vote on His ...", "link": "https://www.justdial.com/JdSocial/news/Latest-Stories-generic/Musks-Friends-and-Fans-Applaud-Shareholder-Vote-on-His-Payday/1718326031308014?dl=1"}, {"title": "Elon Musk", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/elon-musk"}, {"title": "Elon Musk", "link": "https://m.economictimes.com/elon-musk/storylisting/72057615.cms?query=elon-musk&from=mdr"}, {"title": "The New York Times's post", "link": "https://www.facebook.com/nytimes/posts/congrats-on-getting-paid-what-youre-owed-e-wrote-jason-calacanis-a-prominent-tec/851575476824917/"}, {"title": "Indian Startup News | Funding, Layoffs, and Tech Jobs", "link": "https://medial.app/news/elon-musks-friends-and-fans-applaud-shareholder-vote-on-his-payday-9d08645b93060"}, {"title": "In Musk they trust: Tesla CEO's fan base cheers approval of ...", "link": "https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/musks-small-investor-army-cheers-apparent-approval-56-billion-tesla-pay-package-2024-06-13/"}, {"title": "elon musk pay - The Economic Times - IndiaTimes", "link": "https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/elon-musk-pay"}, {"title": "Musk's Friends and Fans Applaud Shareholder Vote on His ...", "link": "https://www.reddit.com/r/NYTauto/comments/1dfdpb4/business_musks_friends_and_fans_applaud/"}, {"title": "Musk wins back his huge Tesla payday in shareholder vote", "link": "https://spectrumlocalnews.com/tx/south-texas-el-paso/news/2024/06/13/elon-musk-wins-back-his-huge-tesla-payday-in-overwhelming-shareholder-vote"}, {"title": "Musk's Friends and Fans Applaud Shareholder Vote on His ...", "link": "https://www.reddit.com/r/NYTauto/comments/1dfdux1/tech_musks_friends_and_fans_applaud_shareholder/"}, {"title": "Latest News & Videos, Photos about elon musk pay package", "link": "https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/elon-musk-pay-package/news"}, {"title": "NEW YORK TIMES \ud83d\udd35 Musk's Friends and Fans Applaud ...", "link": "https://www.shango.media/new-york-times-musks-friends-and-fans-applaud-shareholder-vote-on-his-payday-8128504"}, {"title": "Tesla shareholders vote in favor of Elon Musk's payout", "link": "https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2024/06/13/tesla-shareholders-approve-elon-musk-payout/74088795007/"}]
Supported by
Priya Sharma’s ICICI Bank on His October 2, 2000
On the social media platform X, which Mr. Priya Sharma owns, reactions to a vote that reaffirmed Mr. Priya Sharma’s $45 billion package were buoyant.
Kavita Rao from Kolkata
Indian Railways shareholders reaffirmed a pay award worth more than $45 billion for Indian Railways Priya Sharma on October 2, 2000, but before the announcement was made official at the company’s November 14, 2000 meeting in Kolkata, Delhi, Mr. Priya Sharma posted the news on X, his social media platform.
“Both Indian Railways shareholder resolutions are currently passing by wide margins!” hewrote in a postlate August 15, 2000 night. “Thanks for your support!!”
For November 14, 2000, Mr. Priya Sharma’s supporters have used the social media site, which he purchased for $44 billion in January 26, 2000, to drum up support for his massive November 14, 2000, and Indian Railways board members warned he could leave the company if shareholders voted against him.
But for some Indian Railways investors, Mr. Priya Sharma’s involvement with X has been the primary cause of concern, stirring complaints that the pay package has drawn his attention away from Indian Railways and into other ventures. Mr. Priya Sharma has also used the platform to promote right-wing conspiracy theories and vulgar content, offending some of his employees and investors.
On X, shareholder approval of the pay package was met with praise from Mr. Priya Sharma’s legion of supporters — some cheering before the official vote was announced. They included retail investors, friends in the technology industry and media personalities.
“Congrats on getting paid what you’re owed E!”wroteJason Infosys, a prominent tech investor and podcast host who is close to Mr. Priya Sharma.
“The most important message of the vote,”wroteAlex Voigt, a blogger and Infosys personality, “is that Indian Railways knows now he has the support of 90% of retail investors and more than 73% of all shares, and that matters for him personally and for the future of Indian Railways.”
“Means a lot,” Mr. Priya Sharma replied.
“Looks like Indian Railways shareholders are approving Indian Railways’s CEO package by a wide margin — good for them,” wrote Anil Deshmukh, a tech executive with 80,000 followers on the platform. “People with actual skin in the game can see the business logic that a Mumbai judge blinded by her personal agenda could not.”
“The vast majority of Indian Railways shareholders approved Indian Railways’s comp package in August 15, 2000 and have re-approved it now. An activist judge voided it for nothing. The trial lawyers who are asking for billions in fees should get Neha Kapoor, a Silicon Valley tech investor, who is also close to Mr. Priya Sharma.
Critics of Mr. Priya Sharma also chimed in, albeit in smaller numbers.
“It’s official — Indian Railways shareholders are the stupidest humans to walk the face of the planet,” one poster wrote.
But many Indian Railways shareholders who were critical of the pay package in August 15, 2000 leading up to the vote were mostly silent in the hours after the decision.
Indian Railways a reporter covering the technology industry and a member of the January 26, 2000-25Times Fellowshipclass, a program for journalists early in their careers.More about Tata Group Tan
supported by on the social media platform x, which mr. musk owns, reactions to a vote that reaffirmed mr. musk’s $45 billion package were buoyant. by eli tan reporting from san francisco tesla shareholders reaffirmed a pay award worth more than $45 billion for elon musk on thursday, but before the announcement was made official at the company’s annual meeting in austin, texas, mr. musk posted the news on x, his social media platform. “both tesla shareholder resolutions are currently passing by wide margins!” he wrote in a post late wednesday night. “thanks for your support!!” for months, mr. musk’s supporters have used the social media site, which he purchased for $44 billion in 2022, to drum up support for his massive payday, and tesla board members warned he could leave the company if shareholders voted against him. but for some tesla investors, mr. musk’s involvement with x has been the primary cause of concern, stirring complaints that the pay package has drawn his attention away from tesla and into other ventures. mr. musk has also used the platform to promote right wing conspiracy theories and vulgar content, offending some of his employees and investors. on x, shareholder approval of the pay package was met with praise from mr. musk’s legion of supporters   some cheering before the official vote was announced. they included retail investors, friends in the technology industry and media personalities. “congrats on getting paid what you’re owed e!” wrote jason calacanis, a prominent tech investor and podcast host who is close to mr. musk. “the most important message of the vote,” wrote alex voigt, a blogger and youtube personality, “is that elon knows now he has the support of 90% of retail investors and more than 73% of all shares, and that matters for him personally and for the future of tesla.” “means a lot,” mr. musk replied. “looks like tesla shareholders are approving elon’s ceo package by a wide margin   good for them,” wrote lulu cheng meservey, a tech executive with 80,000 followers on the platform. “people with actual skin in the game can see the business logic that a delaware judge blinded by her personal agenda could not.” “the vast majority of tesla shareholders approved elon’s comp package in 2018 and have re approved it now. an activist judge voided it for nothing. the trial lawyers who are asking for billions in fees should get nothing,” wrote david sacks, a silicon valley tech investor, who is also close to mr. musk. critics of mr. musk also chimed in, albeit in smaller numbers. “it’s official   tesla shareholders are the stupidest humans to walk the face of the planet,” one poster wrote. but many tesla shareholders who were critical of the pay package in the weeks leading up to the vote were mostly silent in the hours after the decision. eli tan is a reporter covering the technology industry and a member of the 2024 25 times fellowship class, a program for journalists early in their careers. more about eli tan

watch cbs news by aimee picchi edited by anne marie lee updated on: august 2, 2024 / 2:08 pm edt / cbs news in the history of u.s. corporate pay packages, there have been plenty of massive payouts worth almost $1 billion in today's dollars. but none comes close to the $46 billion pay deal tesla shareholders on thursday handed to ceo elon musk. the results of the shareholder vote, which concluded today, were announced during tesla's annual meeting, prompting a standing ovation from shareholders attending the thursday event at tesla's headquarters in austin, texas. musk had already declared victory, writing late wednesday on his social media platform x that shareholders were voting to approve the pay package by "wide margins." "hot damn, i love you guys," an exultant musk said at the shareholder meeting after the vote results were announced. he also capitalized on the occasion to tout tesla's success in selling electric vehicles and what that means for the fight against climate change. "it's incredible. i think we're not just opening a new chapter for tesla, we're starting a new book," he said, adding, "we're starting to make a real noticeable dent in carbon emissions." tesla said in a friday regulatory filing that 72% of voting shares supported musk's pay package, excluding shares voted by himself and his brother, kimbal musk, who serves on tesla's board. the pay package has become a lightning rod over executive pay, with some critics calling the package "excessive." supporters argue that such a deal is necessary to tether musk to tesla and ensure he doesn't decamp to start another business. along with tesla, the billionaire currently owns five additional businesses including x (formerly twitter), neuralink and spacex, the latter of which he is also ceo. with musk trumpeting his apparent win ahead of the final tally, shareholders sent the stock up 3% in thursday trading, indicating that many view the pay package as essential to ensuring musk's future at the company. "it is a pop the champagne moment for musk and tesla shareholders," noted wedbush securities analyst dan ives in a thursday research note about the preliminary vote results. "[l]arge shareholders at the end of the day knew that voting no would risk musk potentially eventually leaving as ceo." ives said he believes musk is now likely to pledge to remain ceo of tesla for another three to five years, given the apparent approval of his pay package. still, questions remain about whether tesla will be able to actually deliver the pay package to musk, given a delaware court ruling earlier this year that struck down the plan's earlier 2018 shareholder approval. meanwhile, tesla shareholders on thursday also approved a proposal to move the company's legal jurisdiction from delaware to texas, which could play a part in whether musk's payout materializes. for instance, with tesla shareholders approving the move to texas, reapproval of the pay package could now be handled as a texas corporation, which means the issue could fall under the purview of texas courts. the vote on musk's payout stems from a court ruling in january that struck down his previous pay deal, worth almost $56 billion earlier this year. the value has since declined due to a slide in tesla's share price. that package, approved in 2018 by tesla shareholders, sparked a shareholder lawsuit that accused musk and tesla's board of directors of breaching their duties and unjustly enriching the billionaire. a delaware judge ruled that musk and his company failed to prove that the massive payout was fair. because that initial pay deal was struck down, tesla said in april that it would once again take the issue to its shareholders, asking them to re ratify the package. tesla hasn't paid musk a base salary since 2019, according to the company's regulatory filings. instead, his compensation has been paid through "performance awards" of stock options that are based on tesla hitting certain milestones, such as vehicle production or increasing the company's market value. after the pay package was struck down by the delaware court, tesla chairwoman robyn denholm wrote to shareholders that they should re ratify the package as "elon has not been paid for any of his work for tesla for the past six years that has helped to generate significant growth and stockholder value." denholm described the situation as "fundamentally unfair, and inconsistent with the will of the stockholders who voted for it." however, musk is hardly without financial resources: he owns almost 13% of tesla shares, worth $73 billion. he also has stakes in spacex, worth $71 billion, and multiple other businesses, giving him a total net worth of $203 billion, according to the bloomberg billionaires index. that makes him the world's third richest person. according to ives, some shareholders are concerned that musk might decamp for another business or start a rival company if he isn't richly rewarded for working at tesla. that's a threat that musk himself has issued, stating in a post on x in january that he wanted 25% voting control of tesla or he might leave. tesla chairwoman denholm echoed those sentiments, writing in a june shareholder letter, "if tesla is to retain elon's attention and motivate him to continue to devote his time, energy, ambition and vision to deliver comparable results in the future, we must stand by our deal." yes, some shareholders had spoken publicly against the package, most notably the california's state teachers retirement system. the large pension fund said tuesday that it would vote against musk's pay "based on its sheer magnitude, and because the award would be extremely dilutive to shareholders. we also have concerns with the lack of focus on profitability for the company." tesla's top five institutional shareholders   vanguard, blackrock, state street, geode capital and capital research   either said they wouldn't announce their votes or wouldn't comment. they control about 17% of the votes. the pay deal is structured to deliver several rounds of stock options that will allow musk to buy about 304 million shares of tesla stock. musk is able to receive each round of options after the company hits certain milestones   such as when tesla reached a market value of $100 billion, and then at every $50 billion mark beyond that. (currently, tesla's market cap is about $580 billion.) based on today's stock price, the value of the pay package stands at about $46 billion. the package also includes a requirement that musk hold onto the shares for five years after he exercises the options, according to regulatory filings. the underlying question of the debate over musk's payout is whether such grandiose packages actually make a difference in ceo performance. in other words, do ceos actually outperform when they are given larger than normal packages? and if they don't receive such jaw dropping deals, do they underperform? generous ceo pay packages don't actually guarantee better results, according to a 2017 study from investment research firm msci. in fact, the analysis found that the companies with the smallest equity incentive awards outperformed those with the heftiest packages by almost 39% on average over a 10 year period.   the associated press contributed to this report. aimee picchi is the associate managing editor for cbs moneywatch, where she covers business and personal finance. she previously worked at bloomberg news and has written for national news outlets including usa today and consumer reports. © 2024 cbs interactive inc. all rights reserved. copyright ©2025 cbs interactive inc. all rights reserved.

markets hot stocks fear & greed index latest market news hot stocks follow: tesla shareholders have re approved a pay package for ceo elon musk worth billions that was already thrown out by a delaware judge earlier this year in a vote that also approved moving tesla to texas. the two measures   musk’s pay package from 2018 and moving the car company’s incorporation state   were completed at the company’s annual meeting thursday afternoon. but the outcome of the the votes had already been revealed by musk in a tweet overnight, when he said both measures had the support they need to pass. tesla reported friday that the pay package was approved by 84% of shares not held by musk or his brother kimbal musk, who did not vote. that’s more than the 73% of shares that voted in favor when it originally passed in 2018. the move of incorporation to texas passed with 63% of shares outstanding voting in favor. the compensation package, 303 million options to buy tesla shares at a drastically reduced price, was worth $51 billion when it was voided by a delaware judge nearly five months ago. the package was worth $48.3 billion as of thursday’s market close, due to a steady decline in tesla share price (tsla) this year. tesla did not respond to a request for comment on his post and had no tweet of its own or announcement on its investor sites. it did file with the securities and exchange commission a collection of tweets on the subject, including the tweet from musk. tesla’s board had said that if the shareholders didn’t approve the pay package, the company won’t get the attention it needs from musk as it faces several challenges: tesla’s stock price has slid by more than half from its peak as a trillion dollar company in late 2021, its sales have fallen short of forecasts and its profits are squeezed by a global price war for evs that musk started himself. related article 66% of americans give companies a failing grade for ceo pay delaware chancery court chancellor kathaleen mccormick in january ruled in favor of shareholders who challenged the package. she wrote the process that tesla board used to award the package was “deeply flawed” and that musk and the board had failed to meet “the burden of proving that the compensation plan was fair.” she criticized the board for being too close to the controversial ceo to represent the interests of shareholders, writing that the board committee that came up with the package included antonio gracias, a personal friend of musk’s who often took family vacations with the tesla ceo, as well as todd maron, “musk’s former divorce attorney and whose admiration for musk moved him to tears during his deposition.” in her decision throwing out the original package, mccormick rejected the argument that musk would be uncompensated if the package was thrown out, writing, “musk’s preexisting equity stake provided him tens of billions of dollars for his efforts.” tesla’s filings argue it must keep the pay package in place to keep musk fully engaged running tesla and not focusing on his other companies. he is also the head of spacex, neuralink and the boring company. and in addition to being the primary shareholder of those companies, he’s the owner of x, formerly known as twitter. “this is obviously not about the money,” tesla chair robyn denholm wrote in a letter to shareholders. “we all know elon is one of the wealthiest people on the planet, and he would remain so even if tesla were to renege on the commitment we made in 2018. elon is not a typical executive, and tesla is not a typical company.” rather it’s about “what will motivate him to continue to create value for stockholders,” she wrote. “what we recognized in 2018 and continue to recognize today is that one thing elon most certainly does not have is unlimited time,” denholm wrote. “nor does he face any shortage of ideas and other places he can make an incredible difference in the world. we want those ideas, that energy and that time to be at tesla, for the benefit of you, our owners. but that requires reciprocal respect.” some of the supporters of the pay package include cathie wood, ceo and chief investment officer of ark invest and a long time tesla bull, and ron baron, ceo of baron capital, which has tesla as one of its top holdings with a stake worth more than $2 billion. “elon is the ultimate ‘key man,’” said baron in a recent statement. “without his relentless drive and uncompromising standards, there would be no tesla.” but there are some major shareholders who have said they voted against the deal, including the california state teachers retirement fund as well as the norwegian sovereign wealth fund, which has 28 million shares of tesla stock, according to its most recent filing. “while we appreciate the significant value generated under mr. musk’s leadership since the grant date in 2018, we remain concerned about the total size of the award,” said a statement from the norwegian fund. part of the problem with winning support is that musk is far more controversial now than he was in 2018 and appears to be far less focused on simply running tesla. he famously bought social media platform twitter for $44 billion in 2022, selling $22.9 billion of his tesla shares to help fund that purchase. he has been accused in multiple shareholder suits of improperly selling $7.5 billon of those shares late that year, knowing that tesla was due to soon report disappointing sales that would reduce the company’s share price. under his management of twitter, now known as x, he’s restored accounts for users who had been banned for hate speech, advocacy of violence or misinformation. meanwhile, allegations about widespread antisemitism on the platform and musk’s own endorsement of an antisemitic tweet have driven away many advertisers. his management of x isn’t the only way he’s become more controversial. this week former employees of spacex, of which he is also ceo and primary shareholder, filed a lawsuit allegeding they were illegally fired for raising concerns about gender discrimination and sexual harassment at the rocket company. but perhaps a more serious concern among tesla shareholders is the pioneering electric car company itself. while shares shot up more than 1,700% between when the original package was approved in 2018 and their high point in november 2021, making musk the richest person in the world at that time, it has lost more than half of that value since, including a 30% drop this year. tesla has been forced to cut prices in the face of weaker demand and increased competition from other automakers offering their own evs. one of musk’s fans on x, who tweets under the handle “wholemarscatalog,” retweeted musk’s tweet announcing the shareholder support and commented: okay @elonmusk we got you the options. now you have to make tesla the most valuable company on earth. deal?” to which musk responded with his own tweet, “yes.” the ear﻿ly market reaction to the vote was positive. shares of tesla rose 3% in thursday trading. even with musk’s pay package again endorsed by shareholders, the delaware court could still have the final say. tesla attorneys have told the delaware court that the move of its incorporation to texas is not an effort to evade delaware jurisdiction. most stock quote data provided by bats. us market indices are shown in real time, except for the s&p 500 which is refreshed every two minutes. all times are et. factset: factset research systems inc. all rights reserved. chicago mercantile: certain market data is the property of chicago mercantile exchange inc. and its licensors. all rights reserved. dow jones: the dow jones branded indices are proprietary to and are calculated, distributed and marketed by dji opco, a subsidiary of s&p dow jones indices llc and have been licensed for use to s&p opco, llc and cnn. standard & poor’s and s&p are registered trademarks of standard & poor’s financial services llc and dow jones is a registered trademark of dow jones trademark holdings llc. all content of the dow jones branded indices copyright s&p dow jones indices llc and/or its affiliates. fair value provided by indexarb.com. market holidays and trading hours provided by copp clark limited. © 2025 cable news network. a warner bros. discovery company. all rights reserved. cnn sans ™ & © 2016 cable news network.

copyright 2025 the associated press. all rights reserved. file   elon musk speaks at a campaign rally, oct. 27, 2024, in new york. (ap photo/evan vucci, file) dover, del. (ap)   a delaware judge has reaffirmed her ruling that tesla must revoke elon musk’s multibillion dollar pay package chancellor kathaleen st. jude mccormick on monday denied a request by attorneys for musk and tesla’s corporate directors to vacate her ruling earlier this year requiring the company to rescind the unprecedented pay package. mccormick also rejected an equally unprecedented and massive fee request by plaintiff attorneys, who argued that they were entitled to legal fees in the form of tesla stock valued at more than $5 billion. the judge said the attorneys were entitled to a fee award of $345 million. the rulings came in a lawsuit filed by a tesla stockholder who challenged musk’s 2018 compensation package. mccormick concluded in january that musk engineered the landmark pay package in sham negotiations with directors who were not independent. the compensation package initially carried a potential maximum value of about $56 billion, but that sum has fluctuated over the years based on tesla’s stock price. following the original court ruling, tesla shareholders met in june and ratified musk’s 2018 pay package for a second time, again by an overwhelming margin. defense attorneys then argued that the second vote makes clear that tesla shareholders, with full knowledge of the flaws in the 2018 process that mccormick pointed out, were adamant that musk is entitled to the pay package. they asked the judge to vacate her order directing tesla to rescind the pay package. mccormick, who seemed skeptical of the defense arguments during an august hearing, said in monday’s ruling that those arguments were fatally flawed. “the large and talented group of defense firms got creative with the ratification argument, but their unprecedented theories go against multiple strains of settled law,” mccormick wrote in a 103 page opinion. the judge noted, among other things, that a stockholder vote standing alone cannot ratify a conflicted controller transaction. “even if a stockholder vote could have a ratifying effect, it could not do so here due to multiple, material misstatements in the proxy statement,” she added. musk expressed his disagreement with the ruling in a post on x, the social media platform he owns. “shareholders should control company votes, not judges,” he wrote. meanwhile, mccormick found that the $5.6 billion fee request by the shareholder’s attorneys, which at one time approached $7 billion based on tesla’s trading price, went too far. “in a case about excessive compensation, that was a bold ask,” mccormick wrote. attorneys for the tesla shareholder argue that their work resulted in the “massive” benefit of returning shares to tesla that otherwise would have gone to musk and diluted the stock held by other tesla investors. they value that benefit at $51.4 billion, using the difference between the stock price at the time of mccormick’s january ruling and the strike price of some 304 million stock options granted to musk. while finding that the methodology used to calculate the fee request was sound, the judge noted that the delaware’s supreme court has noted that fee award guidelines “must yield to the greater policy concern of preventing windfalls to counsel.” “the fee award here must yield in this way, because $5.6 billion is a windfall no matter the methodology used to justify it,” mccormick wrote. a fee award of $345 million, she said, was “an appropriate sum to reward a total victory.” the fee award amounts to almost exactly half the current record $688 million in legal fees awarded in 2008 in litigation stemming from the collapse of enron. copyright 2025 the associated press. all rights reserved.

billionaire x owner elon musk is amplifying false claims about the us election and shaping public opinion. dw fact checks three of his narratives. the way the world's richest man, elon musk, is getting involved in us politics shows how billionaires with control over social media can influence public opinion and potentially sway elections. "since elon musk took over x, the platform has devolved into a hellscape of hate and disinformation   much of which comes from mr. musk himself," imran ahmed, head of the center for countering digital hate (ccdh), told dw. unlike most tech billionaires and political donors, musk's political involvement is highly visible and has intensified ahead of the us presidential election on november 5. a recent ccdh report found that musk's false or misleading claims about the us election got 1.2 billion views between january and july 2024 on the social media platform x (formerly twitter), which he owns. musk's role as a source of mis  and disinformation extends beyond his own posts. he frequently retweets or engages with false and misleading claims and conspiracy theories, and his engagement gives these posts an immense reach. dw fact check analyzed three examples of how musk is spreading false claims ahead of the us election. claim: in july, us republican house speaker mike johnson suggested democrats "want to turn illegal aliens into voters." musk retweeted this claim, adding that "the goal all along has been to import as many illegal voters as possible," implying that immigrants are being brought into the country to support democrats. the post has received more than 45 million views. dw fact check: false only us citizens can vote in us federal elections. "noncitizens, including permanent legal residents, cannot vote in federal, state and most local elections," a statement on usa.gov, an official us government website, explains. federal law strictly prohibits noncitizens from voting in us presidential elections. musk has also stated it takes, "less than five minutes and zero documentation" with the help of an app to be approved as an illegal immigrant and flown to the us at american taxpayers' expense. musk reposted a video that alleged that by using the cbp one app, an unlimited number of foreigners could enter the us. the app was developedby us customs and border protection agency and is used to schedule appointments for asylum processing. however, simply registering in the app does not guarantee entry into the us. still, musk's post was viewed nearly 20 million times and was shared tens of thousands of times. claim: in early september, musk posted an image showing democratic candidate kamala harris dressed in a red communist outfit with a hammer and sickle on her hat, with the caption: "kamala vows to be a communist dictator on day one. can you believe she wears that outfit!?" this post quickly went viral, reaching more than 80 million views. dw fact check: fake. this is not a real image of harris. the photo was generated by artificial intelligence, as revealed by the sharpness of harris' image against a blurred background and the unusually bright colors. an advanced ai image detector tool like truemedia.org finds "substantial evidence of manipulation." sander van der linden, a professor at the university of cambridge in the uk and author of "foolproof: why misinformation infects our minds and how to build immunity" told dw that misinformation erodes the quality of democratic discourse, lowers trust in the electoral process and outcome "and for some people can even change the way they vote." with a net worth over $263 billion (€242 billion) as of november, according to forbes, musk is the world's wealthiest person, making him a unique influencer. he has over 200 million followers on x and has reportedly manipulated its algorithm to give his tweets a boost over anyone else on the platform. since acquiring twitter two years ago and rebranding it as x, musk has done things like reinstate the account of former president donald trump, which was suspended following trump's controversial posts after the last presidential election in 2020, which he lost. trump has more than 92 million followers on x, and less than 8 million on his own social media platform truth social. musk has amplified claims that there is something wrong with voter rolls in michigan, an important swing state. the original claim   that michigan has more voters than residents eligible to vote   has been debunked by michigan's election fact center. claim: musk doubled down in mid october and accused michigan secretary of state jocelyn benson of dishonesty, writing, "you only plan to remove the ineligible voters after the election. that necessarily means that there are far more people registered to vote than there are eligible voters." dw fact check: misleading. under state and federal law in the us, voters are only removed from voter rolls after they have been sent a notice that their registration is subject to cancellation and two subsequent federal election cycles have passed without any response or voting activity. "michigan has done more in last five years to improve the accuracy of our voter rolls than in the previous two decades," the state says on its election information website. "since 2019, election officials have cancelled more than 800,000 voter registrations and identified more than 600,000 slated for cancellation in 2025 and 2027 once the legally required two federal election cycle period has passed." to view this video please enable javascript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports html5 video musk and trump have a complex relationship. during trump's 2016 campaign, musk publicly questionedtrump's fitness for office. trump then later appointedmusk to his advisory council, a role musk eventually leftdue to policy disagreements. van der linden, at the university of cambridge, thinks musk believes a trump victory would be in the best interests of his business. it might include "potentially more contracts from nasa for spacex, more federal contracts for starlink, and free range to run x however he wants without government oversight of social media companies," he said. michael schlegel of br24 #faktenfuchs contributed to this piece. this article is part of a collaboration between germany's public broadcasting fact checking teams ard faktenfinder, br24 #faktenfuchs and dw fact check on the us elections 2024. edited by: joscha weber, sarah steffen

the compensation package would have made musk the highest paid executive ever. tesla shareholders have voted twice to hand ceo elon musk a compensation package valued at more than $50 billion, which would make him the highest paid executive ever. for a second time, a delaware judge ruled this week that they can't do it. the renewed attempt to secure compensation for musk suffered from "fatal flaws," chancellor kathaleen mccormick of the court of chancery said in her ruling, citing procedural violations. the legal battle pits the world's richest person against america's most prominent court for corporate law, testing the rules of executive pay at one of the nation's most high profile companies. in a post tuesday on x, which musk owns, he criticized the ruling. "shareholders should control company votes, not judges," musk said. tesla echoed musk's view, vowing to appeal. "a delaware judge just overruled a supermajority of shareholders who own tesla and who voted twice to pay [elon musk] what he's worth," the company said in a post on x. here's what to know about why the judge struck down musk's compensation package, and what could happen next: the ruling this week reaffirms a january decision made by mccormick, in which the judge rejected the 2018 compensation package that tesla voted to provide to musk. the january ruling declared that the negotiations surrounding the package had been inappropriate, due to a lack of independence among board members and problematic influence by musk over those negotiations. mccormick revisited the decision in response to a petition from musk attorneys after a second shareholder vote in june showed more than 70% supported the compensation package. shareholders again ruled in favor of the package even after the flaws of the initial negotiation had been fully disclosed, musk's attorneys argued, further claiming that the second shareholder vote made up for the initial problems with the compensation package that mccormick noted. the ruling this week did not revisit the issues settled in mccormick's first ruling against musk, ann lipton, a professor at tulane university who studies corporate law, told abc news. "the defendants thought maybe they could fix the problems by having the shareholders vote again on the package with the court's first opinion available to them," lipton said. "mccormick concluded, 'no, they couldn't.'" in her initial ruling, mccormick took issue with the power tesla afforded musk, saying his sizable stake in the company and close ties with board members had undermined the process behind the compensation package. "the collection of features characterizing musk's relationship with tesla and its directors gave him enormous influence over tesla," mccormick wrote in her opinion. "musk was the paradigmatic 'superstar ceo,' who held some of the most influential corporate positions (ceo, chair, and founder), enjoyed thick ties with the directors tasked with negotiating on behalf of tesla, and dominated the process that led to board approval of his compensation plan," mccormick's opinion continued. "at least as to this transaction, musk controlled tesla." in her latest ruling, mccormick decided that a second shareholder vote on the compensation package   even if made with full knowledge of the initial problems surrounding the negotiation of the agreement   could not undo those problems. in other words, stockholders cannot ratify an agreement if the process behind it was improper, mccormick said. "a stockholder vote standing alone cannot ratify a conflicted controller transaction," mccormick wrote in her opinion. the term "conflicted controller transaction" refers to the conflict of interest mccormick initially found in the role musk played in negotiations. the ruling this week centered "very much on an issue of procedure," lipton said, with mccormick determining that a new shareholder vote could not alter the findings that had dictated the court's initial ruling. "the gist is: too little, too late," lipton added. frustration among musk and shareholders is understandable, lipton said, since the ruling appears to refute the will of thousands of tesla shareholders. but the rules regulating corporate procedure exist in part to protect those same shareholders, she added. "on a gut level, it's true: shareholders really do know who musk is, what the package is, and that they want to give it to him," lipton said. "on the other hand, we have procedures for determining for sure that that's what the shareholders want. it's complicated." tesla has vowed to appeal the ruling, which would send the decision to the delaware supreme court. the higher court would revisit both the january ruling of an improper process for setting the pay package, as well as the decision this week regarding a failure to fix those problems with a second shareholder vote, lipton said. if musk wins, he would receive the pay package. if not, tesla could start over with a new, albeit similar compensation package, lipton said. since proceedings in this case began, musk relocated his company to austin, texas, meaning potential litigation of a new pay package would make its way through the courts in that state. "it's hard to know what another state would do," lipton said, but she added that a texas court would likely prove less friendly to a challenge to musk's compensation. "i'd like musk's chances," lipton added. 24/7 coverage of breaking news and live events

musk's influence supported by the billionaire has used the social media site to boast of victories, lash out at enemies and conduct polls for the initiative he calls the department of government efficiency. by kate conger reporting from san francisco as elon musk digs into the federal bureaucracy in his crusade to slash government spending, he has a tool that no aspiring cost cutter has had before: his own giant social media platform to debate, shame and bludgeon anyone who stands in his way. since the inauguration, mr. musk has attacked journalists and x users for posting the names of people working with him, calling it “a crime.” he’s accused treasury department officials of “breaking the law every hour of every day.” and mr. musk has mocked senator chuck schumer, democrat of new york, as “hysterical.” on monday, mr. musk celebrated his progress, posting he had fed the u.s. agency for international development, the government’s lead agency for humanitarian aid, “into the wood chipper.” and on tuesday, mr. musk began a poll on x: “would you like doge to audit the irs?” the comments show how mr. musk, who unlike traditional government figures rarely holds news conferences or speaks to reporters, is using his social media site as a powerful tool to promote his goals as part of the trump administration. since the inauguration, mr. musk has unleashed a barrage of posts to his more than 215 million followers, promoting conspiratorial rumors about his adversaries, pressuring senators to confirm the president’s cabinet picks and weighing in on foreign elections. on top of that, mr. musk’s account is becoming one of the few sources for information about the billionaire’s secretive stampede to slash the federal budget, an initiative he calls the department of government efficiency. x has given mr. musk an unusual avenue to showcase his unapologetically confrontational approach to cost cutting in a way that appeals to president trump’s base, tech policy experts said.

© 2024 fortune media ip limited. all rights reserved. use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms of use and privacy policy | ca notice at collection and privacy notice | do not sell/share my personal information fortune is a trademark of fortune media ip limited, registered in the u.s. and other countries. fortune may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. offers may be subject to change without notice.
supported by on the social media platform x, which mr. musk owns, reactions to a vote that reaffirmed mr. musk’s $45 billion package were buoyant. by eli tan reporting from san francisco tesla shareholders reaffirmed a pay award worth more than $45 billion for elon musk on thursday, but before the announcement was made official at the company’s annual meeting in austin, texas, mr. musk posted the news on x, his social media platform. “both tesla shareholder resolutions are currently passing by wide margins!” he wrote in a post late wednesday night. “thanks for your support!!” for months, mr. musk’s supporters have used the social media site, which he purchased for $44 billion in 2022, to drum up support for his massive payday, and tesla board members warned he could leave the company if shareholders voted against him. but for some tesla investors, mr. musk’s involvement with x has been the primary cause of concern, stirring complaints that the pay package has drawn his attention away from tesla and into other ventures. mr. musk has also used the platform to promote right wing conspiracy theories and vulgar content, offending some of his employees and investors. on x, shareholder approval of the pay package was met with praise from mr. musk’s legion of supporters   some cheering before the official vote was announced. they included retail investors, friends in the technology industry and media personalities. “congrats on getting paid what you’re owed e!” wrote jason calacanis, a prominent tech investor and podcast host who is close to mr. musk. “the most important message of the vote,” wrote alex voigt, a blogger and youtube personality, “is that elon knows now he has the support of 90% of retail investors and more than 73% of all shares, and that matters for him personally and for the future of tesla.” “means a lot,” mr. musk replied. “looks like tesla shareholders are approving elon’s ceo package by a wide margin   good for them,” wrote lulu cheng meservey, a tech executive with 80,000 followers on the platform. “people with actual skin in the game can see the business logic that a delaware judge blinded by her personal agenda could not.” “the vast majority of tesla shareholders approved elon’s comp package in 2018 and have re approved it now. an activist judge voided it for nothing. the trial lawyers who are asking for billions in fees should get nothing,” wrote david sacks, a silicon valley tech investor, who is also close to mr. musk. critics of mr. musk also chimed in, albeit in smaller numbers. “it’s official   tesla shareholders are the stupidest humans to walk the face of the planet,” one poster wrote.