Trump Has Been Convicted. Here’s What Happens Next.
Donald J. Trump has promised to appeal, but he may face limits on his ability to travel and to vote as he campaigns for the White House.
Trump Hush-MoneyTrialTrump Has Been Convicted. Here’s What Happens Next.Donald J. Trump has promised to appeal, but he may face limits on his ability to travel and to vote as he campaigns for the White House.ByJesse McKinleyandMaggie AstorThe conviction of former President Donald J. Trump on Thursday is just the latest step in his legal odyssey in New York’s court system. The judge, Juan M. Merchan, set Mr. Trump’s sentencing for July 11, at which point he could be sentenced to as much as four years behind bars, or to probation.It won’t stop him from running for president, though: There isno legal prohibition on felons doing that. No constitutional provision would stop him even from serving as president from a prison cell, though in practice that would trigger a crisis that courts would almost certainly have to resolve.His ability to vote — for himself, presumably — depends on whether he is sentenced to prison. Florida, where he is registered, requires felons convicted there to complete their full sentence, including parole or probation, before regaining voting rights. But when Floridians are convicted in another state, Florida defers to the laws of that state, and New York disenfranchises felons only while they are in prison.The Trump Manhattan Criminal Verdict, Count By CountFormer President Donald J. Trump faced 34 felony charges of falsifying business records, related to the reimbursement of hush money paid to the porn star Stormy Daniels in order to cover up a sex scandal around the 2016 presidential election.“Because Florida recognizes voting rights restoration in the state of conviction, and because New York’s law states that those with a felony conviction do not lose their right to vote unless they are incarcerated during the election, then Trump will not lose his right to vote in this case unless he is in prison on Election Day,” said Blair Bowie, a lawyer at the Campaign Legal Center, a nonprofit watchdog group.Mr. Trump will almost certainly appeal his conviction, after months of criticizing the case and attacking the Manhattan district attorney, who brought it, and Justice Merchan, who presided over his trial.
[{"title": "Trump has been convicted. Here's what happens next", "link": "https://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/30/trump-guilty-crime-felony-what-happens-next.html"}, {"title": "What Happens Now That Trump Has Been Convicted?", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/30/nyregion/trump-conviction-hush-money-trial.html"}, {"title": "Now that Donald Trump has been convicted, what happens ...", "link": "https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/now-donald-trump-convicted/story?id=110721655"}, {"title": "What happens now that Trump has been convicted in his ...", "link": "https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/30/politics/what-happens-now-trump-felony/index.html"}, {"title": "Trump has been convicted. Here's what happens next", "link": "https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/trump-has-been-convicted-heres-what-happens-next/"}, {"title": "Now that Trump's a convicted felon, here's what happens ...", "link": "https://www.politico.com/news/2024/05/30/trump-guilty-verdict-whats-next-00160814"}, {"title": "What's next for Donald Trump after hush money conviction", "link": "https://apnews.com/article/trump-conviction-what-to-know-a70941a7cd367f7b2aa3218ea91ad922"}, {"title": "Will Trump Go To Prison? Here's What Happens Now That ...", "link": "https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2024/05/30/will-trump-go-to-prison-heres-what-happens-now-that-hes-been-found-guilty-in-hush-money-case/"}, {"title": "What Happens After Trump Is Convicted in NY Trial?", "link": "https://time.com/6980638/what-happens-if-donald-trump-convicted/"}, {"title": "Here's what happens after Trump's guilty verdict in 'hush ...", "link": "https://nypost.com/2024/05/30/us-news/heres-what-happens-now-that-trumps-been-convicted/"}, {"title": "Trump Convicted Of All 34 Felonies In Hush Money Trial", "link": "https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2024/05/30/trump-convicted-of-felony-in-hush-money-trial-heres-what-happens-next-live-updates/"}, {"title": "What's next for Donald Trump after hush money conviction?", "link": "https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/5/31/hush-money-next-for-trump"}, {"title": "Trump Has Been Convicted. Can He Still Run for President?", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/article/trump-investigation-conviction.html"}, {"title": "The jury convicted Trump. Here's what could happen next.", "link": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/05/29/trump-if-convicted-hush-money-trial-new-york/"}, {"title": "Donald Trump found guilty of all 34 charges in hush money ...", "link": "https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-hush-money-trial-05-30-24/index.html"}]
Neha Kapoor
Kavita Rao Has Been Convicted. Here’s What Happens Next.
Kavita Rao has promised to appeal, but he may face limits on his ability to travel and to vote as he campaigns for Infosys.
Neha Kapoor McKinleyandMaggie Astor
The conviction of former President Kavita Rao on October 2, 2000 is just the latest step in his legal odyssey in Mumbai court system. The judge, Priya Sharma, set Mr. Kavita Rao’s sentencing for August 15, 2000, at which point he could be sentenced to as much as four years behind bars, or to probation.
It won’t stop him from running for president, though: There isno legal prohibition on felons doing that. No constitutional provision would stop him even from serving as president from a prison cell, though in practice that would trigger a crisis that courts would almost certainly have to resolve.
His ability to vote — for himself, presumably — depends on whether he is sentenced to prison. Mumbai, where he is registered, requires felons convicted there to complete their full sentence, including parole or probation, before regaining voting rights. But when Floridians are convicted in another state, Mumbai defers to the laws of that state, and Kolkata disenfranchises felons only while they are in prison.
The Kavita Rao Bengaluru Criminal Verdict, Count By Count
Former President Kavita Rao faced 34 felony charges of falsifying business records, related to the reimbursement of hush money paid to the porn star Indian Railways in order to cover up a sex scandal around the January 26, 2000 presidential election.
“Because Mumbai recognizes voting rights restoration in the state of conviction, and because Mumbai law states that those with a felony conviction do not lose their right to vote unless they are incarcerated during the election, then Kavita Rao will not lose his right to vote in this case unless he is in prison on October 2, 2000,” said Rajiv Mehta, a lawyer at Infosys, a nonprofit watchdog group.
Mr. Kavita Rao will almost certainly appeal his conviction, after November 14, 2000 of criticizing the case and attacking the Bengaluru district attorney, who brought it, and Justice Rajiv Mehta, who presided over his trial.
donald j. trump has promised to appeal, but he may face limits on his ability to travel and to vote as he campaigns for the white house. by jesse mckinley and maggie astor the conviction of former president donald j. trump on thursday is just the latest step in his legal odyssey in new york’s court system. the judge, juan m. merchan, set mr. trump’s sentencing for july 11, at which point he could be sentenced to as much as four years behind bars, or to probation. it won’t stop him from running for president, though: there is no legal prohibition on felons doing that. no constitutional provision would stop him even from serving as president from a prison cell, though in practice that would trigger a crisis that courts would almost certainly have to resolve. his ability to vote   for himself, presumably   depends on whether he is sentenced to prison. florida, where he is registered, requires felons convicted there to complete their full sentence, including parole or probation, before regaining voting rights. but when floridians are convicted in another state, florida defers to the laws of that state, and new york disenfranchises felons only while they are in prison. former president donald j. trump faced 34 felony charges of falsifying business records, related to the reimbursement of hush money paid to the porn star stormy daniels in order to cover up a sex scandal around the 2016 presidential election. “because florida recognizes voting rights restoration in the state of conviction, and because new york’s law states that those with a felony conviction do not lose their right to vote unless they are incarcerated during the election, then trump will not lose his right to vote in this case unless he is in prison on election day,” said blair bowie, a lawyer at the campaign legal center, a nonprofit watchdog group. mr. trump will almost certainly appeal his conviction, after months of criticizing the case and attacking the manhattan district attorney, who brought it, and justice merchan, who presided over his trial.

trump administration supported by transcript the 5 to 4 decision upholding president trump’s travel ban basically did two things. the majority said that the president had been given vast authority over immigration and national security by congress and that he acted consistent with that authority. the second thing it did was reject the claim that the travel ban was infected by religious discrimination. “donald j. trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of muslims entering the united states.” the majority discounted the president’s statements and said the role of the courts was to look at the face of the presidential proclamation issued in september, and that proclamation, the court said, was lawful. the supreme court has occasionally looked at the scope of presidential power, and it’s gone both ways. it imposed some limits on president george w. bush’s ability to hold people in guantánamo bay. it rejected president truman’s attempt to seize the steel industry during the korean war. and it forced president nixon to turn over tapes concerning the watergate scandal that led to his departure from office. the crux of the argument against the travel ban was based on president trump’s tweets and statements on the campaign trail and in office, in which he suggested that he was singling out muslims for discriminatory treatment. in the lower courts and now at the supreme court, there was a strong partisan divide, with every republican appointee voting to sustain the travel ban and every democratic appointee in dissent. the majority opinion gave rise to a very striking dissent from justice sonia sotomayor, who spoke at length in the supreme court courtroom about the terrible precedent the majority set and how it resonated with some of the darkest periods in american history, notably the internment of more than 100,000 japanese americans during the second world war. the decision was a major statement on presidential power in the area of immigration and national security, but it didn’t break new ground. the ruling had no particular practical impact because months ago, the supreme court allowed the travel ban to go into effect while it considered the case. what it did instead was decline to impose special legal rules on an idiosyncratic president who speaks in ways that are unfamiliar to american traditions and to say that it was considering the presidency and not president trump in ruling on his travel ban. by adam liptak and michael d. shear washington   the supreme court upheld president trump’s ban on travel from several predominantly muslim countries, delivering to the president on tuesday a political victory and an endorsement of his power to control immigration at a time of political upheaval about the treatment of migrants at the mexican border. in a 5 to 4 vote, the court’s conservatives said that the president’s power to secure the country’s borders, delegated by congress over decades of immigration lawmaking, was not undermined by mr. trump’s history of incendiary statements about the dangers he said muslims pose to the united states. writing for the majority, chief justice john g. roberts jr. said that mr. trump had ample statutory authority to make national security judgments in the realm of immigration. and the chief justice rejected a constitutional challenge to mr. trump’s third executive order on the matter, issued in september as a proclamation. the court’s liberals denounced the decision. in a passionate and searing dissent from the bench, justice sonia sotomayor said the decision was no better than korematsu v. united states, the 1944 decision that endorsed the detention of japanese americans during world war ii. she praised the court for officially overturning korematsu in its decision on tuesday. but by upholding the travel ban, justice sotomayor said, the court “merely replaces one gravely wrong decision with another.” the court’s travel ban decision provides new political ammunition for the president and members of his party as they prepare to face the voters in the fall. mr. trump has already made clear his plans to use anti immigrant messaging as he campaigns for republicans, much the way he successfully deployed the issue to whip up the base of the party during the 2016 presidential campaign. fewer visas have been issued to people from the targeted countries, and the number of refugees has fallen to a historical low. the nation’s highest court faced a far reaching list of cases that renewed its central role in american life.

president elect donald trump will take office on jan. 20, starting the clock on the first 100 days of his second term. trump stated that immigration, trade, taxes and foreign policy, among others, would be the top issues he would tackle immediately. here is a detailed look at what trump’s first 100 days may look like. a hardline approach to immigration has been a tenet of trump’s political career. and it may be the strongest point of contention heading into his first 100 days. “on day one, i will launch the largest deportation program of criminals in the history of america,” trump repeatedly said on the campaign trail. following his 2024 election victory, trump and his allies reiterated that they would prioritize mass deportations and sealing the border. stephen miller, trump’s appointed deputy chief of policy, indicated in an interview with fox news in early december that he believes they can accomplish those goals with the help of the republican controlled congress. "(senate majority leader john thune and sen. lindsey graham) promised that they can get a full funding package for the border, the most significant board of security investment in american history ... to the president's desk in january or early february,” miller said. the package would include funding for more immigration and customs enforcement (ice) agents, stronger barriers and technology at the border, and strategic air and marine operations. however, cnn recently reported that trump’s appointed border czar, tom homan, has privately tempered expectations on initial mass deportation plans, citing a lack of funds. “homan has been telling some of the members that ‘hey, if you want me to do all these things that you’re talking about, this costs money, and it’s not being done with the [continuing resolution] that’s in place now,'” one gop lawmaker told cnn. homan has publicly stated that the administration will need at least $86 billion to start deportation operations. the former acting ice director outlined some components of the administration’s plan in an interview with nbc news, specifically mentioning workplace roundups, partnering with local law enforcement and creating a hotline for tips. additionally, the administration has shown interest in utilizing the military to aid in operations and targeting churches, schools and hospitals for raids. video below: outrage growing over a proposed immigration facility relocation in milwaukee homan indicated that initial deportation efforts will focus on immigrants with criminal records and pending removal orders. but, trump, in his own nbc news interview, conceded that immigrants outside that group would also be deported. “well, i think you have to do it, and it’s a hard   it’s a very tough thing to do. it’s   but you have to have, you know, you have rules, regulations, laws. they came in illegally,” trump said. later on in the interview, trump admitted that even children here legally could be swept up in the deportations. “well, i don’t want to be breaking up families, so the only way you don’t break up the family is you keep them together, and you have to send them all back,” trump said. beyond the funding for capture efforts, another factor that could impede trump’s mass deportation process is the case backlog in immigration courts. according to a congressional report, 3.6 million cases are pending before immigration judges, the largest accumulation of cases in the u.s. immigration system's history. that is a 44% increase from the 2.5 million cases pending the year before. one way trump could deal with that is to push the department of justice, which runs the immigration court system, to budget for and appoint more judges. the administration would also need to expand detention facilities to house more migrants awaiting trial, which homan has advocated for. he said the goal is to establish 100,000 beds, up from the roughly 34,000 existing beds. the last notable hurdle trump could face within the first 100 days on immigration is public perception. newt gingrich, a former republican house speaker, warned the incoming administration that public support for mass deportations could “collapse” if the optics aren’t right. “lincoln once said that with popular sentiment, anything is possible; without popular sentiment, nothing is possible,” gingrich told the guardian. “well, you get very many human stories about mothers or babies or children being deported, then support for the deportation program will collapse.” public support could also turn if the deportations become an economic albatross, as some predict. the american business immigration coalition estimates that agricultural output will fall between $30 to $60 billion if trump’s full deportation plan is carried out. it would also hamper the construction industry, of which undocumented immigrants make up about 14% of the workforce. the american immigration council says mass deportations could reduce the u.s. gross domestic product (gdp) by 4.2 to 6.8% and deprive the country of roughly $49 billion in federal taxes and $29 billion in local and state taxes. according to a 2023 study, 44,000 u.s. born workers could lose their jobs for every 500,000 immigrants removed from the labor force. "certainly, the economic impacts are going to be felt," said david j. bier, the director of immigration studies at the cato institute. "there's going to be supply chain issues. there's going to be increases in prices, decreases in services." nevertheless, with mass deportations being a core campaign promise and trump’s belief that his victory is a mandate from the american people, his administration will likely be steadfast in its approach and will face these hurdles head on, setting up a tempestuous fight over the first 100 days. it’s also important to note a few other immigration related issues that will likely be addressed early in trump’s term: the status of “dreamers,” title 42, travel bans and birthright citizenship. trump attempted to repeal the deferred action for childhood arrivals (daca) program during his first term in office, putting the future of “dreamers” in the hands of the courts, which is still being fought today. however, he has changed his tune a bit, expressing an openness to provide a pathway to citizenship for some daca recipients. “i will work with the democrats on a plan,” he said. “we’re going to have to do something with them,” specifically pointing to "dreamers" who are active members of society, creating businesses and going to school. harkening back to another first term policy, trump has not explicitly said he would fully reinstate his travel ban, which president joe biden repealed. but, he has said he would impose ideological screenings and revoke the visas of campus protesters. it’s also unclear if he would target the same 15 countries he did during his first term. on title 42, a pandemic era policy that restricted access to asylum seekers, trump is reportedly weighing reinstating it after the measure sunsetted during biden’s presidency. lastly, trump said he “absolutely” plans to end birthright citizenship, which provides the right of citizenship to anyone born in the u.s. the policy is widely believed to be protected by the 14th amendment, so any attempt by trump to abolish it would be appealed in court. trump vowed on the campaign trail to extend his tax cuts and jobs act (tcja), which expires at the end of 2025. the 2017 law overhauled the federal tax code, lowering taxes for middle  and upper income households. if the legislation were to expire, many provisions, including the lower tax rates, expanded standard deduction threshold and higher child tax credit, would disappear. the tax code would revert to what it was before the tcja. while many republicans in congress support the extension, the cost of the bill could be a sticking point for others. the committee for a responsible federal budget estimates that renewing the tcja could cost about $5 trillion over the next 10 years. for budget hawks in the party, that could be too rich for their blood unless the costs are offset with cuts or revenue raising measures. ideas that have been floated include cutting green energy tax credits, coupling the tax bill with steep tariffs and utilizing the newly established department of government efficiency (doge), headed by elon musk and vivek ramaswamy, to slash government waste and federal programs. video below: scott bessent discusses trump tax cuts during treasury secretary confirmation hearing however, budget hawks aren’t the only hurdle within the gop. there is also a contingent of republicans demanding that the salt deduction cap be raised. in 2017, the tcja established a $10,000 limit on deducting state and local taxes. previously, that deduction was unlimited. this measure disproportionately affected people in high tax states such as new york, new jersey and california. several representatives from those states have made clear that their votes are incumbent on salt deduction reform. republicans from those states have even weaponized the party’s thin margin of control in the house to their benefit. “two seat majority; eight or 10 very salt y republicans? you guys can do the math on that one,” rep. nick lalota, r n.y., a proponent of a bigger salt deduction, told nbc news. trump expressed support for revising the salt limit during the campaign, though he didn’t dive deep into the details of what that would look like. increasing the limit to $20,000 has reportedly been discussed in the lead up to trump's assuming office. but that won’t cut it, according to another gop congressman. “that’s woefully insufficient,” rep. mike lawler, r n.y., said. lalota recently reintroduced legislation raising the cap to $100,000 for single filers and $200,000 for married couples. another tax related topic that will likely be discussed within the first 100 days is trump’s ability and appetite to fulfill his campaign promise to eliminate taxes on tips and social security. the proposal has garnered support from many americans, particularly the elderly and those in the service industry. however, it’s uncertain if there is support on capitol hill. trump may be faced with the decision to either stick to his promise and put the legislative talks in jeopardy or turn his back on the proposal and pass a viable bill. finally, the last notable tax policy trump is aiming for is further cutting the corporate tax rate. in 2017, he slashed the federal rate from 35% to 21%. his new proposal calls for bringing that down to 15%. tariffs played a major role in trump’s first term office, and they could play a bigger role in his second term. trump sent shockwaves through the global economy in november, following his election victory, when he announced he would institute a flat 25% tariff on all goods from mexico and canada and an additional 10% levy on existing tariffs for all chinese goods. it was an escalation from the campaign trail, where he promised just a 10% increase on all imports worldwide. he cited illegal immigration and drug trafficking as the reasons for his change of heart. “this tariff will remain in effect until such time as drugs, in particular fentanyl, and all illegal aliens stop this invasion of our country!” trump said in a truth social post. this drew immediate responses from canada and mexico, the u.s.’ largest and second largest trading partners. both countries warned of retaliation and mutual harm. “any tariffs imposed by one side would likely prompt retaliatory tariffs, leading to risks for joint enterprises,” mexican president claudia sheinbaum said. “adding 25% tariffs to those products will raise the price for americans almost immediately,” said kirsten hillman, the canadian ambassador to the u.s. “and at a time when the cost of living is challenging, when food prices are high, it seems like the wrong direction to go in. “canada will respond,” she added. “therefore, your number one customer will make american products more expensive and canadians will probably look for alternatives to those products.” economists say that if the tariffs are implemented, companies will surely pass those costs onto consumers, likely raising inflation. “there’s no question that tariffs are inflationary,’’ kent smetters, an economics professor at the university of pennsylvania’s wharton school, told the ap. “exactly how much   that’s where economists can debate it.” video below: canadian premier warns against imposing tariffs other industry leaders shared equally dire warnings. alan siger, the president of the produce distributors association, said that tariffs would raise the prices of fresh fruit and vegetables and ultimately hurt u.s. farmers. “tariffs distort the marketplace and will raise prices along the supply chain, resulting in the consumer paying more at the checkout line,” siger said in an interview with the ap. as for cars, c.j. finn, u.s. automotive sector leader for pwc, said, “a 25% tariff on mexico and canada would severely cripple the u.s. auto industry.” the distilled spirits council of the u.s. cautioned that “tariffs on spirits products from our neighbors to the north and south are going to hurt u.s. consumers and lead to job losses across the u.s. hospitality industry.” despite the warnings, trump has remained intent on implementing the tariffs. he has even doubled down, threatening brics nations with a 100% tariff if they try to undermine the u.s. dollar. brics includes brazil, russia, india, china, south africa, ethiopia, indonesia, iran and united arab emirates. trump also recently announced plans to establish the external revenue service, a new agency that would track and collect money from foreign countries. "through soft and pathetically weak trade agreements, the american economy has delivered growth and prosperity to the world, while taxing ourselves," the president elect said on truth social. "it is time for that to change. i am today announcing that i will create the external revenue service to collect our tariffs, duties, and all revenue that come from foreign sources." trump claimed during his debate with kamala harris that he would end the war between russia and ukraine before his inauguration. while that won’t happen, his administration has said it will work during the first 100 days to broker a peace deal. the details of its approach are unknown. trump and french president emmanuel macron met with ukrainian president volodymyr zelenskyy in paris in december. zelenskyy seemingly came away from the meeting optimistic that trump could aid in peace talks. "trump and i will come to an agreement and ... offer strong security guarantees, together with europe, and then we can talk to the russians," zelenskyy said during a recent podcast interview. trump stated in a january press conference at mar a lago that a meeting with russian president vladimir putin is being arranged and should take place shortly after trump takes office. meanwhile, the world’s other major conflict may be coming to an end soon. at the time of publication, israel and hamas have agreed to a deal to pause fighting in gaza and release some of the hostages on both sides. the hope is that once the first round of hostages   which include women, children, people with severe injuries and people over 50   are released, both sides will agree to a permanent ceasefire and begin plans to rebuild the decimated gaza strip. if the deal holds, it would be a major win for the trump administration in its first 100 days. “this epic ceasefire agreement could have only happened as a result of our historic victory in november, as it signaled to the entire world that my administration would seek peace and negotiate deals to ensure the safety of all americans, and our allies,” trump said in a truth social post following the reported deal. trump added that his appointed special envoy to the middle east, steve witkoff, will continue to work closely with israel and hamas negotiators to ensure the deal's success. the associated press reported that trump is planning over 100 executive orders starting on day one. many orders will focus on the aforementioned issues, like immigration and trade, but trump is expected to go beyond that. for starters, trump has promised to address energy, scrapping most of the climate protections instituted by the biden administration and expanding domestic production. he said he would eliminate the so called “electric vehicle mandate” and green energy subsidies while loosening restrictions on oil, gas and coal. his actions on energy would likely be the first step in a series of deregulatory moves. other industries trump might target are banking, cryptocurrency, agriculture and transportation. “i will sign an executive order directing every federal agency to immediately remove every single burdensome regulation driving up the cost of goods,” trump said at an october rally. “we have so many regulations that hurt our country.” another decision trump will presumably make early on in his second term is whether or not to pardon the individuals convicted in the jan. 6 capitol riot. it seems likely that he will hand down pardons to the roughly 900 people who were charged with misdemeanors. video below: pam bondi discusses pardons for jan. 6 rioters during attorney general confirmation hearing “we’re looking at it right now. most likely, yeah,” trump said when asked during an nbc news interview if he would follow through with the pardons. “those people have suffered long and hard.” the tougher question will be whether he will expand those pardons to the 600 plus individuals who were charged with assaulting, impeding or resisting police, including nearly 200 who carried weapons. in a recent fox news interview, vice president elect jd vance indicated the administration would not support pardoning those individuals. “if you committed violence on that day, obviously you shouldn’t be pardoned,” vance said, adding the caveat that there was a “bit of a gray area” in some cases. trump hasn’t ruled anything out, asserting that his administration will examine each case and make individual decisions. an easier decision for trump will be attempting to eliminate “wokeness” from schools and sports, a top priority of his 2024 campaign. before and after the election, trump has repeatedly promised to defund schools that engage in “inappropriate political indoctrination of our children,” including topics such as critical race theory and gender and sexuality studies. he’s also stated that the administration would defund schools with vaccine or mask requirements. further, trump has expressed support for banning transgender athletes from participating in women’s sports, terminating diversity and inclusion (dei) offices, promoting universal school choice and empowering “parental rights.” trump’s ultimate goal is to abolish the department of education. “i say it all the time: i’m dying to get back to do this. we will ultimately eliminate the federal department of education,” trump said at a september rally in wisconsin. “we will drain the government education swamp and stop the abuse of your taxpayer dollars to indoctrinate america’s youth with all sorts of things that you don’t want to have our youth hearing.” it’s unclear if trump will be able to accomplish this, but it’s highly unlikely to be done within the first 100 days. as for other potential executive actions, trump’s anti woke measures will probably extend to other sectors, such as the military and federal agencies, targeting transgender individuals, eliminating dei programs and firing supposed “leftwing democrats.” hearst television participates in various affiliate marketing programs, which means we may get paid commissions on editorially chosen products purchased through our links to retailer sites.

donald trump has started his second week back in the white house with a controversial halt of all federal aid. the funding pause, revealed in a memo sent to government agencies, was due to come into force on tuesday evening but was stopped by a federal judge at the eleventh hour. also on tuesday, trump signed an executive order targeting transgender medical care for under 19s. he has signed a number of orders since taking office, aimed at cracking down on illegal immigration and reshaping the federal government. he has also issued a number of controversial pardons. his use of executive orders   both swift and broad   carry the weight of law but can be more easily overturned. some face legal challenges. halt to federal aid a two page memo from the office of management and budget and sent to government agencies ordered a pause to all grants and loans until mid february, to ensure all programmes match the administration's agenda. the action is now on hold. doge and elon musk trump has signed a directive creating the department of government efficiency (doge)   a new advisory body on cutting government costs. it is expected to be led by elon musk   who trump separately said would get an office for about 20 employees. freeze on federal hiring another order halts any new federal hiring   except within the us military and several other categories   until the trump administration has full control over the government. federal employees returning to the office trump has also signed a memorandum mandating that federal workers must work in the office and are not allowed to work from home. trump signed an order mandating a process to build a missile defence shield called an iron dome to protect the us. he also enacted moves to reshape the us military by eliminating dei programmes and barring transgender recruits from enlisting. 'national emergency' trump has proclaimed that "america's sovereignty is under attack", declaring this to be a national emergency that allows him to free up more funding to reinforce the border with mexico. border wall the same directive tells officials to relaunch efforts to build a border wall with mexico that was started under his first presidency. this is not an executive order and it is unclear how such an effort might be funded. birthright citizenship trump has ordered that officials deny the right to citizenship to the children of migrants either in the us illegally or on temporary visas. this faces legal challenges. terrorism designation for gangs and cartels trump has designated drug cartels and international gangs as foreign terrorist organisations   adding the likes of salvadoran gang ms 13 to a list that includes the so called islamic state. shutting down legal routes the order also shut down a major biden era immigration pipeline: a sponsorship initiative that allowed up to 30,000 migrants from cuba, haiti, nicaragua and venezuela to fly to the us. it had been designed to cut illegal crossings. refugee resettlement trump has suspended the us refugee resettlement programme, although details remain unclear. trump has said blanket tariffs on china, canada and mexico could come on 1 february. he has ordered federal officials to review us trade relationships for unfair practices, including those with canada, mexico and china. a spat with colombia over deportations sparked a threat by trump to implement 25% tariffs but a deal was reached to avert a trade war. pull out of the paris agreement (again) trump has signed off on withdrawing from the paris climate agreement   the landmark international deal to limit rising global temperatures. he will have to wait a year before it happens. he previously withdrew in 2017, before biden re entered. 'energy emergency' trump has declared a "national energy emergency", promising to fill up oil reserves. in his inaugural address, he vowed to "drill, baby, drill" for more fossil fuels. alaskan fuel he signed an executive order titled "unleashing alaska's extraordinary resource potential", pledging to "unlock" oil, gas and other natural resources from the state. end green new deal trump has halted the green new deal, a series of biden measures that were aimed at boosting green jobs, regulating the fossil fuel industry and limiting pollution. trump signed an executive order to begin the process of withdrawing the us from the un's health body, the world health organization (who). this marks the second time trump has ordered the us be pulled out of the who, after biden re entered it. he was critical of how the geneva based institution handled covid 19. transgender people trump has declared that the us will only recognise "two sexes, male and female. these sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality". it will affect official documents like passports and visas. an executive order called "protecting children from chemical and surgical mutilation" will restrict access to gender affirming medical care such as hormone therapy and surgery for minors. dei a memo, followed by an executive order, has shut down all the offices of diversity, equity and inclusion (dei) programmes within the federal government. trump has signed a directive postponing by 75 days the implementation of a law that would ban chinese owned app tiktok in the us unless a new american owner was found. trump formerly backed a tiktok ban, but indicated he reversed course after his campaign videos attracted billions of views. pardoning hundreds who stormed us capitol trump has issued pardons for nearly 1,600 of his supporters who were arrested in the riot at the us capitol in 2021. he has repeatedly referred to those arrested in the riot as "hostages". at least 600 were charged with assaulting or impeding federal officers. commuting sentences of oath keepers, proud boys trump also commuted sentences for members of the oath keepers and proud boys, far right groups who were convicted of seditious conspiracy in relation to the riot. anti abortion activists twenty three people described by the white house as "peaceful pro life protesters" were pardoned by trump. ten of them were prosecuted under the biden administration for blocking an abortion clinic in washington dc in 2020. silk road trump said he signed a full and unconditional pardon for ross ulbricht, the creator of silk road, a dark web marketplace where illegal drugs were sold. ulbricht was sentenced to life in prison in 2015 on a narcotics and money laundering conspiracy but trump said this was government overreach. 'american first' trump has announced he is pausing foreign aid, outlining that he wants a review of foreign assistance programs. israeli settler sanctions trump rescinded sanctions that biden began imposing on extremist israeli settlers and settler groups in the occupied west bank nearly one year ago. the last administration's executive order was in response to a surge in attacks on palestinians and their property in the territory. regulatory freeze another order directs federal agencies to refrain from issuing any new regulations until the trump administration has full control of the government. unvaccinated federal workers as part of a directive reversing biden era policies, trump revoked a mandate that federal workers must be vaccinated with the covid vaccine. he has promised to reinstate the 8,000 military service members who were discharged over this. tackling inflation trump has signed a directive asking every us federal department and agency to address the cost of living. the directive, which is not an executive order, asks agencies to look at lowering the costs of housing, healthcare and key household items, groceries and fuel. it asks for a report in 30 days. it not clear how the trump administration intends to lower these costs   and this is not detailed in the directive. artificial intelligence trump has signed a directive called the removing barriers to american leadership in artificial intelligence, looking to make the us "the global leader in ai". it aligns with trump's recent announcement of stargate, a proposed $500bn (£404bn) project aimed at creating massive ai data centres in the us. science and technology this directive establishes what the white house calls the president's council of advisors on science and technology. the group will consist of no more than 24 members, including an assistant to the president for science and technology and a special adviser for ai and crypto. the group will be tasked with advising trump on science and tech matters to inform policy decisions and "harness the full power of american innovation". digital financial technology trump has signed an executive order to regulate and promote the crypto industry, and to explore the creation of digital assets. declassification of records on jfk shooting trump has signed a directive ordering the release of classified documents related to the assassination of president john f kennedy in 1963, as well as the 1968 killings of senator robert kennedy and civil rights leader martin luther king jr. 'gulf of america' and alaska's mount denali trump has directed the secretary of the interior to change the name of the gulf of mexico to the "gulf of america". the same order also directs the secretary to rename alaska's mount denali to mount mckinley   in honour of america's 25th president admired by trump. federal recognition of the lumbee tribe of north carolina trump has signed a directive supporting full federal recognition of the lumbee tribe, a group of about 55,000 native americans who mostly live in one north carolina county. this brings with it legal rights and government benefits. follow the twists and turns of trump's second presidential term with north america correspondent anthony zurcher's weekly us politics unspun newsletter. readers in the uk can sign up here. those outside the uk can sign up here. aged just 10 when his father first became president, he's now well over six feet tall, and goes to new york university. the us president spoke about his plans for the second trump administration, as well as criticising the 'corrupt establishment'. watch the historic moment when the 45th president is returned to power as he takes the oath of office. elon musk, mark zuckerberg and jeff bezos were among those invited inside the capitol for donald trump's swearing in. thousands of people joined in on demonstrations as the united states prepares to inaugurate its new president. the outgoing us president warned against power in the hands of the wealthy, the threat of the tech industry and climate change. trump's pick for us attorney general was pressed on claims of election fraud and pardons for january 6 rioters. donald trump's defence secretary nominee was asked about his stance on women in combat and his alleged excessive drinking. harris, who trump defeated in the 2024 election, presided over the event as required by the us constitution. among the allies the president elect has chosen to join his administration are contentious figures, including among fellow republicans. the president elect has nominated rfk to lead the department of health and human services. the suspect used an “improvised incendiary device” to start the fire in portland, oregon, ahead of the us election. a week after losing the election, kamala harris's team are still appealing for funds. republicans have won control of both chambers of congress, yielding trump limited congressional oversight for at least 2 years. the president and president elect shook hands as part of a long standing tradition signifying the transfer of power. given all the things they’ve said about each other, joe biden and donald trump’s meeting could be really awkward. 'i think putin believes that he knows how to play trump', says trump's former adviser john bolton. the russian president says he was impressed by trump's reaction to the first assassination attempt against him. the president addressed americans from the white house for the first time since donald trump's election victory. after donald trump's decisive victory, we asked americans what they think made the difference for each campaign. elon musk's work to shrink the us government is being met with outrage from democrats and aid groups. the full senate voted in the evening, approving bondi as the next attorney general, tasked with running the department of justice. a conservative think tank set out a sweeping vision for governing that could influence trump's next term. what influence has it had so far? trump claims more taxes on trade wouldn't be a cost to the us   but almost all economists dispute this. the vaccine sceptic would have broad power over food safety, vaccinations and pharmaceuticals. copyright 2025 bbc. all rights reserved. the bbc is not responsible for the content of external sites. read about our approach to external linking.

copyright 2025 the associated press. all rights reserved. donald john trump has won the 2024 presidential election, marking his return to the white house after serving as the 45th president of the united states. republican presidential nominee former president donald trump points to the crowd at an election night watch party, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/julia demaree nikhinson) republican presidential nominee former president donald trump smiles at former first lady melania trump an election night watch party at the palm beach convention center, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/evan vucci) republican presidential nominee former president donald trump waves as he walks with former first lady melania trump at an election night watch party at the palm beach convention center, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/evan vucci) supporters react as they watch election results at an election night campaign watch party for republican presidential nominee former president donald trump tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/alex brandon) republican vice presidential nominee sen. jd vance, r ohio, speaks as eric trump, from left, lara trump, republican presidential nominee former president donald trump and former first lady melania trump look on at an election night watch party, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/alex brandon) republican presidential nominee former president donald trump speaks at an election night watch party, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/julia demaree nikhinson) members of the alpha kappa alpha sorority stand in silhouette as they attend an election watch party tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, in chicago. (ap photo/charles rex arbogast) eric brown picks up trash left behind from democratic presidential nominee vice president kamala harris’ election night campaign watch party wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, on the campus of howard university in washington. (ap photo/david j. phillip) supporters of democratic presidential nominee vice president kamala harris attend an election night campaign watch party tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, on the campus of howard university in washington. (ap photo/mark schiefelbein) attendees leave democratic presidential nominee vice president kamala harris’ election night watch party at howard university, tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, in washington. (ap photo/terrance williams) an election worker processes mail in ballots for the 2024 general election at the philadelphia election warehouse, tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, in philadelphia. (ap photo/matt rourke) screens show poll results in times square in new york on election day, tuesday, nov. 5, 2024. (ap photo/yuki iwamura) people wait in line to vote on election day at the bernalillo county visitor center while the sunsets in the south valley of albuquerque, n.m., on tuesday, nov. 5, 2024. (chancey bush/the albuquerque journal via ap) republican presidential nominee former president donald trump arrives at an election night watch party at the palm beach convention center, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/julia demaree nikhinson) donald john trump has won the 2024 presidential election, marking his return to the white house after serving as the 45th president of the united states. republican presidential nominee former president donald trump points to the crowd at an election night watch party, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/julia demaree nikhinson) republican presidential nominee former president donald trump points to the crowd at an election night watch party, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/julia demaree nikhinson) republican presidential nominee former president donald trump smiles at former first lady melania trump an election night watch party at the palm beach convention center, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/evan vucci) republican presidential nominee former president donald trump smiles at former first lady melania trump an election night watch party at the palm beach convention center, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/evan vucci) republican presidential nominee former president donald trump waves as he walks with former first lady melania trump at an election night watch party at the palm beach convention center, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/evan vucci) republican presidential nominee former president donald trump waves as he walks with former first lady melania trump at an election night watch party at the palm beach convention center, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/evan vucci) supporters react as they watch election results at an election night campaign watch party for republican presidential nominee former president donald trump tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/alex brandon) supporters react as they watch election results at an election night campaign watch party for republican presidential nominee former president donald trump tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/alex brandon) republican vice presidential nominee sen. jd vance, r ohio, speaks as eric trump, from left, lara trump, republican presidential nominee former president donald trump and former first lady melania trump look on at an election night watch party, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/alex brandon) republican vice presidential nominee sen. jd vance, r ohio, speaks as eric trump, from left, lara trump, republican presidential nominee former president donald trump and former first lady melania trump look on at an election night watch party, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/alex brandon) republican presidential nominee former president donald trump speaks at an election night watch party, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/julia demaree nikhinson) republican presidential nominee former president donald trump speaks at an election night watch party, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/julia demaree nikhinson) members of the alpha kappa alpha sorority stand in silhouette as they attend an election watch party tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, in chicago. (ap photo/charles rex arbogast) members of the alpha kappa alpha sorority stand in silhouette as they attend an election watch party tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, in chicago. (ap photo/charles rex arbogast) eric brown picks up trash left behind from democratic presidential nominee vice president kamala harris’ election night campaign watch party wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, on the campus of howard university in washington. (ap photo/david j. phillip) eric brown picks up trash left behind from democratic presidential nominee vice president kamala harris’ election night campaign watch party wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, on the campus of howard university in washington. (ap photo/david j. phillip) supporters of democratic presidential nominee vice president kamala harris attend an election night campaign watch party tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, on the campus of howard university in washington. (ap photo/mark schiefelbein) supporters of democratic presidential nominee vice president kamala harris attend an election night campaign watch party tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, on the campus of howard university in washington. (ap photo/mark schiefelbein) attendees leave democratic presidential nominee vice president kamala harris’ election night watch party at howard university, tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, in washington. (ap photo/terrance williams) attendees leave democratic presidential nominee vice president kamala harris’ election night watch party at howard university, tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, in washington. (ap photo/terrance williams) an election worker processes mail in ballots for the 2024 general election at the philadelphia election warehouse, tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, in philadelphia. (ap photo/matt rourke) an election worker processes mail in ballots for the 2024 general election at the philadelphia election warehouse, tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, in philadelphia. (ap photo/matt rourke) screens show poll results in times square in new york on election day, tuesday, nov. 5, 2024. (ap photo/yuki iwamura) screens show poll results in times square in new york on election day, tuesday, nov. 5, 2024. (ap photo/yuki iwamura) people wait in line to vote on election day at the bernalillo county visitor center while the sunsets in the south valley of albuquerque, n.m., on tuesday, nov. 5, 2024. (chancey bush/the albuquerque journal via ap) people wait in line to vote on election day at the bernalillo county visitor center while the sunsets in the south valley of albuquerque, n.m., on tuesday, nov. 5, 2024. (chancey bush/the albuquerque journal via ap) republican presidential nominee former president donald trump arrives at an election night watch party at the palm beach convention center, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/julia demaree nikhinson) republican presidential nominee former president donald trump arrives at an election night watch party at the palm beach convention center, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/julia demaree nikhinson) follow ap’s coverage of donald trump’s transition back to the white house. washington (ap)   donald trump scored a decisive victory in a deeply divided nation. and in so doing, the republican president elect exposed a fundamental weakness within the democratic base and beat back concerns about his moral failings, becoming the first u.s. president with a felony conviction. trump won over frustrated voters with bold promises that his fiery brand of america first economic populism and conservative culture would make their lives better. he will be tested immediately, however, and there are reasons to believe his plans for mass deportations and huge tariffs may hurt the very people who enabled his victory. still, he is set to enter the white house on jan. 20, 2025, from an undisputed position of strength. with votes still being counted, he could become the first republican in two decades to win the popular vote. the results left democrats facing an urgent and immediate reckoning, with no obvious leader to unite the anti trump coalition and no clear plan to rebuild as an emboldened trump prepares to re take washington. here are some key takeaways: supporters react as they watch election results at an election night campaign watch party for republican presidential nominee former president donald trump tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/alex brandon) supporters react as they watch election results at an election night campaign watch party for republican presidential nominee former president donald trump tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/alex brandon) black voters   men and women   have been the bedrock of the democratic party, and in recent years, latinos and young voters have joined them. all three groups still preferred democrat kamala harris. but preliminary data from ap votecast, a survey of more than 120,000 voters nationwide, suggested that trump made significant gains. voters under age 30 represent a fraction of the total electorate, but about half of them supported harris. that’s compared to the roughly 6 in 10 who backed biden in 2020. slightly more than 4 in 10 young voters went for trump, up from about one third in 2020. at the same time, black and latino voters appeared slightly less likely to support harris than they were to back biden four years ago, according to ap votecast. about 8 in 10 black voters backed harris, down from the roughly 9 in 10 who backed biden. more than half of hispanic voters supported harris, but that was down slightly from the roughly 6 in 10 who backed biden in 2020. trump’s support among those groups appeared to rise slightly compared to 2020. collectively, those small gains yielded an outsize outcome. republican presidential nominee former president donald trump waves as he walks with former first lady melania trump at an election night watch party at the palm beach convention center, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/evan vucci) republican presidential nominee former president donald trump waves as he walks with former first lady melania trump at an election night watch party at the palm beach convention center, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/evan vucci) for all of the showmanship, profanity and name calling, trump ultimately won over voters with grand promises to improve the economy, block the flow of immigrants on the southern border and his siren call to “make america great again.” what to know about the 2024 election: news outlets globally count on the ap for accurate u.s. election results. since 1848, the ap has been calling races up and down the ballot. support us. donate to the ap. he also appealed to religious voters in both parties by seizing on the democrats’ support for the transgender community. overall, about half of trump voters said inflation was the biggest issue factoring into their election decisions. about as many said that of the situation at the u.s. mexico border, according to ap votecast. he papered over the fact that the economy by many conventional metrics is robust   inflation is largely in check and wages are up   while border crossings have dropped dramatically. he talked right past the facts and through relentless repetition convinced voters. he also sold them on the promise of the largest mass deportation effort in u.s. history, although he has not explained how such an operation would work. and he is threatening to impose massive tariffs on key products from china and other american adversaries, which economists warn could dramatically boost prices for average americans. ultimately, trump’s victory may have had as much to do with the fundamental challenges harris faced all along. facing deep voter frustration over the direction of the country   with biden’s approval rating dismal   she never did distance herself from her party’s sitting president. though trump has now been the central figure in american politics for nine years, he convinced voters he represented change. supporters of democratic presidential nominee vice president kamala harris attend an election night campaign watch party tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, on the campus of howard university in washington. (ap photo/mark schiefelbein) supporters of democratic presidential nominee vice president kamala harris attend an election night campaign watch party tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, on the campus of howard university in washington. (ap photo/mark schiefelbein) trump is poised to inherit a nation with deepening political and cultural fissures and a worried electorate. when asked what most influenced their vote, about half of voters cited the future of democracy. that was higher than the share who answered the same way about inflation, immigration or abortion policy. and it crosses over the two major parties: about two thirds of harris voters and about a third of trump voters said the future of democracy was the most important factor in their votes. that’s not surprising given the realities of the trump era and the rhetoric of the campaign. trump refused to acknowledge his 2020 defeat and watched his supporters ransack the u.s. capitol on jan. 6, 2021, as congress convened to certify democrat joe biden’s victory. trump even mused two days before election day that he “shouldn’t have left” the white house after repeatedly promising retribution to his political enemies. harris, by the end of the campaign, joined other critics   including trump’s former white house chief of staff   in describing the former president and now president elect as a “fascist.” trump, meanwhile, labeled harris a “fascist” and a “communist.” republican presidential nominee former president donald trump arrives at an election night watch party at the palm beach convention center, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/julia demaree nikhinson) republican presidential nominee former president donald trump arrives at an election night watch party at the palm beach convention center, wednesday, nov. 6, 2024, in west palm beach, fla. (ap photo/julia demaree nikhinson) incomplete returns show that donald trump’s criminal convictions, additional pending indictments and any concerns over his most incendiary rhetoric simply were not a sufficient concern to keep tens of millions of americans from voting for him. according to ap votecast, slightly more than half of voters said harris has the moral character to be president, compared to about 4 in 10 who said that about trump. it’s quite possible, as trump has said many times on the campaign trail, that his legal peril actually helped him. as it stands, trump may never actually face sentencing in a new york business fraud case in which he was convicted of 34 felonies. for now, his sentencing is scheduled for later this month. he’s already had one federal indictment in florida dismissed, sparing him from a trial on whether he flouted u.s. law on protecting national security secrets. and he’s made clear he would use his power as president to spike the federal case against him for his role in the jan. 6 attack on the u.s. capitol. that would leave a georgia racketeering case pending against trump and others accused of trying to subvert the 2020 election result. screens show poll results in times square in new york on election day, tuesday, nov. 5, 2024. (ap photo/yuki iwamura) screens show poll results in times square in new york on election day, tuesday, nov. 5, 2024. (ap photo/yuki iwamura) it was the first presidential election after the supreme court overturned roe v. wade and ended a woman’s national right to terminate a pregnancy. it was also the first time that a republican presidential candidate overly courted males with a hypermasculine approach. but the “gender gap” that resulted was not enough to sink trump. about half of women backed harris, while about half of men went for trump, according to ap votecast. that appears largely consistent with the shares for biden and trump in 2020. attendees leave democratic presidential nominee vice president kamala harris’ election night watch party at howard university, tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, in washington. (ap photo/terrance williams) attendees leave democratic presidential nominee vice president kamala harris’ election night watch party at howard university, tuesday, nov. 5, 2024, in washington. (ap photo/terrance williams) just a few months ago, harris generated incredible excitement across the party. she raised more than a billion dollars seemingly overnight. she dominated her debate with trump. she filled arenas. and just days ago drew a massive crowd to the ellipse and national mall. but in the end, it wasn’t enough. meanwhile, republicans have claimed control of the senate, ousting veteran sen. sherrod brown of ohio and putting several other democratic incumbents on the edge of defeat. the results will give trump a significant advantage in pushing his agenda through congress. their only hope is to win a house majority built mostly through key suburban districts in california and new york, but that was far from certain early wednesday. and either way, the results shrink democrats’ geographic footprint and, with brown’s loss, diminish the kind of working class voice that can counter trump’s appeal. trump already succeeded in painting democrats as out of touch culturally with middle america. now democrats are left to wonder how to reconnect with parts of the country and slices of the electorate that rejected them. ___ copyright 2025 the associated press. all rights reserved.

a second trump administration will renew efforts to erode constitutional foundations of our democracy, make it harder for americans to vote   particularly voters of color, voters with limited english proficiency, voters with disabilities, older voters, and other marginalized voters   and spread false, debunked theories designed to undermine confidence in the integrity of our voting system. trump is already casting doubt on the 2024 election, saying he will not accept its outcome if he doesn’t win and insinuating that violence would follow his defeat. his ongoing lies about the election process endanger the public’s trust in the country’s ability to carry out free and fair elections, and embolden and enable allies in state and local government to pursue similar tactics. here, we focus on three areas that pose significant threats to democracy and voting rights should trump be elected to a second term. first, if re elected, trump is likely to renew efforts to add a citizenship question to the 2030 census   a move that would catastrophically reduce response rates among immigrant communities and exclude noncitizens from population counts. census population counts impact apportionment of representatives, funding, and other resource allocation. adding a citizenship question and excluding noncitizens from the count is not only unconstitutional; it would also result in significantly undercounting historically vulnerable or underrepresented populations, specifically latine and asian communities and those living in urban areas, and would have reverberating negative impacts on district maps and allocation of funding. we defeated the previous trump administration’s attempt to do this and will use every tool at our disposal to stop it again. if re elected in november, trump and his allies have promised to take actions that would disenfranchise millions and suppress the right to vote. source: american civil liberties union second, if reelected, trump is likely to abuse executive power in service of his relentless attacks on our election system. with an aim toward disenfranchising, criminalizing, and intimidating voters and election administrators, he would set the groundwork for questioning election outcomes that are adverse to him and his allies. this abuse of power may take several forms: fight back against bigotry, injustice and inequality. make your donation to the aclu today. source: american civil liberties union finally, a second trump administration would mean a reversal of nonpartisan federal efforts to promote and expand access to voting, particularly for marginalized communities. as recent attacks by trump surrogates and allies in congress underscore, if re elected, trump would almost certainly rescind president biden’s executive order 14019 on promoting access to voting. this executive order includes measures aimed at increasing language access, mitigating barriers for individuals with disabilities, and increasing voter education and registration opportunities under the national voter registration act (nvra). moreover, the doj under a trump administration may also join in such reversals. nevertheless, we will double down on holding violators of federal voting laws accountable in court and increase the pressure on congress and states to enact more robust voting protections that strengthen our democracy. many of trump’s anticipated anti voter policies would violate the constitution and federal law. as always, litigation would be a key tool in the aclu’s response. the aclu has extensive experience challenging restrictive and discriminatory voting laws in court. since 2013, we have filed or intervened in more than 100 cases to defend voting rights, including leading successful litigation against the first trump administration’s attempt to rig and weaponize the 2020 census   twice defending its integrity at the supreme court. should a second trump administration take office, we are ready to go to court to block efforts to undermine the census and representational equality. we would also work to shut down trump’s expected efforts to use the office of the president to fuel the false voter fraud narrative that would justify and embolden others to engage in voter suppression, voter and election worker intimidation, and baseless attacks on election outcomes. litigation on behalf of marginalized communities has always been challenging. many americans are understandably concerned about the impact of trump’s judicial appointments on civil rights and civil liberties litigation. but we have nonetheless succeeded, even before conservative courts, in proving that restrictions on ballot access, which have proliferated since the supreme court’s shelby county v. holder decision in 2013, unlawfully discriminate against voters from historically marginalized communities and interfere with their ability to participate in the political process. in fact, since 2016, we have secured important results in favor of voting rights   even from trump appointed judges in the lower courts. and we achieved a landmark ruling at the supreme court in allen v. milligan, 599 u.s. 1 (2023), which held that alabama’s 2021 congressional map likely violated section 2 of the voting rights act of 1965 (vra) and affirmed the framework and constitutionality of that provision   a ruling joined in substantial part by a trump appointee, justice brett kavanaugh. litigation remains a tool with deep and meaningful impact. and even when we don’t win, litigation serves an important role: it publicly calls out unlawful policies and builds the kind of political and grassroots support that results in more just policies over time. a second trump administration will no doubt renew its assaults on democracy; and we will answer in turn by bringing litigation where feasible. the grave threats that a second trump presidency pose to american democracy demand robust defensive and proactive responses from congress. first, we will utilize our political power on capitol hill to push congress to serve as a firewall against any of trump’s attempts to erode democracy or voting rights. we will work with lawmakers to advance legislation essential to protect our democracy, including the john lewis voting rights advancement act, which restores and strengthens the vra to prevent racial discrimination in voting, as well as core provisions of the freedom to vote act, which increases access to the ballot. while these measures are unlikely to become law under a trump presidency, congressional action, including regular committee and subcommittee hearings, is essential to maintain the saliency, immediacy, and relevance of the threats to democracy that these bills address. historically, civil rights victories have often required years of advocacy with nonlinear progress; we will remain determined, even under a trump presidency, to lobby and organize until these bills become law. we will hold congress accountable to use every constitutional authority and legislative avenue available to stop trump’s authoritarian, anti democracy policies and practices, including its investigative and oversight authority and the power of the purse. to fight back against expected federal attacks on voting rights under trump, we will use our political power and presence in all 50 states to demand that state and local officials protect and strengthen the franchise through laws and policies that increase access to the ballot for every eligible voter. funding for local elections is a shared responsibility, and we will fight to ensure that states provide local election officials with ample and consistent funding every appropriations cycle for updated equipment, election worker training, messaging campaigns to counter mis/disinformation, and measures to ensure election worker security. finally, we will advocate for states to enact policies barring state and local law enforcement agencies from cooperating with federal law enforcement in any trump directed effort to intimidate voters through their presence at or near polling or ballot return locations. the results of each decennial census are used to apportion seats in congress among the states, draw congressional and state legislative district lines within each state, and distribute billions in federal funding for essential services. as a result, ensuring a fair and accurate count was a crucial part of the aclu’s work in the run up to the 2020 census, and we successfully halted two attempts by the trump administration to rig the count. going into the next census cycle, trump’s allies have made clear that carving noncitizens out of the 2030 census count would be a key priority for a second trump administration. the aclu would fight any attempts to do so. project 2025   an influential conservative “presidential transition project,” which former senior trump officials helped write   has put forth several radical ideas to remake the census and disrupt a fair count. in addition to other proposals that a second trump administration should take to reshape the census bureau “to execute a conservative agenda” measures that have alarmed former high level officials, including some who served in the trump administration   project 2025 proposes adding a citizenship question. as we know from the 2020 census litigation, adding such a question would have catastrophically reduced 2020 response rates among immigrant communities. in turn, it would have caused diverse communities in places like california, illinois, and new york to lose representation and cut their share of federal dollars   including public funding “used for hospitals, roads, schools, housing, supporting veterans, feeding children and families, economic development, and so much more.” meanwhile, trump’s allies in congress have proposed legislation to dramatically remake the census and the resulting apportionment and allocation of funding. in may 2024, the republican led house passed a bill that would add a citizenship question to the census and exclude all noncitizens   regardless of lawful status   from the number used to divide house seats among the states. at this time, these laws have no chance of passing the senate   and would be met with an executive veto if they did   but a second trump administration would no doubt quickly push the same legislation or unilaterally implement similar policies, even without a supportive congress. senator bill hagerty, a trump ally who has sponsored a senate version of the house bill, said of the foundational process of counting noncitizens for apportionment purposes: “why would we count people who are here illegally?” the short answer to senator hagerty’s question is that the constitution demands it, because “population is the true basis of representation.” but the question ignores that the bill also indiscriminately targets millions of lawfully admitted noncitizens. the consequences of not counting noncitizens would be dire. according to a pew research center study, removing just undocumented immigrants from the apportionment count would result in california, florida, and texas each losing a house seat. as noted earlier, experts anticipated massive effects on political representation and funding for important social services if a citizenship question was added to the 2020 census. the census bureau predicted this would result in 9 million fewer people not responding   effectively the same as if the census skipped a state as populous as new jersey. meanwhile, the census bureau estimates that there are more than 46 million noncitizens in the united states   meaning eliminating noncitizens from the apportionment process altogether would likely have exponentially worse consequences than even adding a citizenship question. trump’s mission to remove noncitizens from the census count is not just un american; it is unlawful. as we successfully did twice before, we would meet trump in the courts. efforts to exclude noncitizens from the census would be vulnerable to legal challenges for infringing on the fundamental rights of immigrant communities and communities of color, violating numerous laws and regulations, and abusing executive power. between 2018 and 2020, the aclu successfully fought off two attempts from the trump administration to rig the 2020 census count. in 2019, the supreme court ruled in favor of aclu represented plaintiffs, blocking the first trump administration’s attempt to add a citizenship question to the census. before leaving office, the trump administration again tried to rig the census by announcing it would exclude undocumented immigrants from the figures used to apportion seats in congress. we sued again, but in trump v. new york, 592 u.s. 125 (2020), the supreme court ruled that our case was premature. our lawsuit, however, contributed to delaying the actions of trump’s political appointees at the census bureau so this proposal was not implemented, and, on january 20, 2021, the day he took office, president biden rescinded the policy. fighting unilateral executive action to rig the census would be harder this time around. in 2019, the supreme court did not say that a citizenship question was itself out of bounds. it only concluded that the trump administration gave a “contrived” reason for its action   that is, it lied. at the time, the administration claimed that adding a citizenship question to the census was needed to better enforce the vra. but the record showed that adding the question would not serve that purpose; it would only hurt the census count and data. given a do over, trump would likely lie better   or not at all. recent proposals to carve noncitizen populations from the census count have not masked their true purpose, but they can still be challenged from many angles. the fourteenth amendment provides that representatives in congress are apportioned based on the “whole number of persons in each state.” that language is clear: noncitizens are “persons” and must be part of the apportionment count. it is also foundational: even at the founding, when voters were almost exclusively adult, white men, it was understood that congress represented all persons, including children, women, and (most offensively) three fifths of a state’s enslaved population. any attempt by trump to bypass the requirement that all persons be included in the count by purposefully depressing response rates with a citizenship question, or by wholly removing noncitizens from the tabulation, would be unconstitutional. the census act also instructs the commerce secretary to conduct the census every 10 years, and for the president to report to congress “the whole number of persons in each state.” it requires “the whole number of persons”   not citizens   whose “usual residence” is in the united states to be counted where they live. trump’s previous attempt to exclude noncitizens from being counted clearly violated these principles by excising noncitizens and aiming to submit something other than “the whole number of persons.” if trump or his commerce secretary again pushed to exclude noncitizens   whether with lawful status or not   from the count, they would squarely violate their statutory duties. separately, the fifth amendment’s due process clause bans the federal government from denying any person the equal protection of the laws. this guarantee is not limited by a person’s immigration or citizenship status, and applies to “all persons” in the united states. any attempt by the trump administration to exclude noncitizens from apportionment figures would violate the due process and equal protection clauses by discriminating against noncitizens on the basis of national origin and citizenship. that is true whether trump tries to exclude noncitizens by executive action or through legislation passed by congress. either way, it would be an unambiguous attempt to harm noncitizens by denying their personhood, limiting their access to political power, and draining resources from the communities they live in. adding a citizenship question to the census would similarly violate the fifth and fourteenth amendments by purposefully dissuading immigrants or those who live with them from responding to the census. since many major cities have sizeable immigrant communities, a citizenship question would lead to an inaccurate census that would ultimately result in the harmful effect of diminished representation for the urban areas where most americans live as well as reduced federal funding for programs in those communities. in a trump presidency, we will work diligently to thwart attempts to make good on the promise to manipulate the census. knowing this is a top priority of trump and his congressional allies, we are prepared to push congress to reject any effort to move legislation that weakens the census act’s requirement that “the whole number of persons” be counted in each decennial census or any attempt to mandate a citizenship question. our expert lobbyists will brief members of congress on the detrimental impact that an inaccurate census count would have on their home state and constituents, including decreases in federal funding and congressional representation. in addition, we will push congress to exercise constitutional oversight over the department of commerce and census bureau to expose attempts to incorporate a citizenship question or otherwise politicize the census count. lastly, the senate should ensure that any nominee to the role of census bureau director is questioned carefully about their support for a citizenship question and whether they would exclude noncitizens from the count. we will leverage our affiliate presence in all 50 states to enlist state level elected officials and influential voices from the places most likely to be negatively impacted by excluding noncitizens from the census count. because elected officials from across the political spectrum are from states poised to lose funding and congressional representation if noncitizens are removed from census apportionment, we will forge bipartisan alliances to vocalize opposition to any census manipulation. our organizing arm is prepared to enlist our supporters in states across the country to raise awareness of any attempt to manipulate the census and demand that congress stop any bill that would not count all persons. trump’s previous census manipulation attempts caused public confusion as to who should complete the census. that confusion is certain to return if trump makes similar attempts in a second term. we will again use our nationwide reach to educate the public on the importance of all people completing the census. the office of the president comes with the largest bully pulpit as well as a swath of substantive powers. a second trump presidency is likely to make use of this wide array of powers to target voters and election workers. such abuse of executive powers might take a variety of forms. if past is prologue, a second trump presidency likely will institute sham commissions aimed at bolstering the false narrative of stolen elections and justifying voter suppression laws and unjustified mass purges of voters from the rolls that sweep in and cancel the registrations of eligible voters. a second trump administration may abuse federal police and prosecutorial powers to launch sham investigations, attack voters and election officials, and encourage vigilantism. the big lie and trump’s false claim that he actually won the 2020 election are well known. but trump makes claims attacking electoral results not only in elections he lost, but also those he won. even before his 2017 inauguration, trump publicly argued that “illegal” votes led him to lose new hampshire and the nationwide popular vote. with this animating concern in the background, trump used the office of the presidency to fuel his lies about illegal voting, with the apparent aim of targeting disfavored voters and making it more difficult to vote. in may 2017, trump established a presidential commission to “study the registration and voting processes used in federal elections,” the so called “pence  kobach commission.” rather than appointing known experts on election process and security, trump tapped former kansas secretary of state kris kobach, known for his anti immigrant and voter suppressive efforts, as commission co chair. four of the six commission appointees were well known for making baseless claims about voter fraud or had implemented or supported policies that unlawfully disenfranchised voters. from the start, the pence kobach commission sought to further the illegal voting narrative and undermine election outcomes. the commission was quickly hampered by lawsuits   including one brought by the aclu   because it failed to follow federal laws. still, commission co chair kobach sought to collect the voter rolls from all 50 states and the district of columbia, in an effort to take failed voter purge policies he had tried to implement in kansas nationwide. specifically, the trump administration sought to compare state voter rolls against data housed in various federal databases to identify supposedly ineligible registrants. but the commission’s requests for voting roll data were met with broad and bipartisan criticism. experts stressed that this kind of “checking” would result in rampant false positives because of small differences in spacing or spelling on voter rolls, inconsistencies in data collection and formatting, and the reality of common names and birthdays. cybersecurity experts also decried the commission’s plans to aggregate voter data as a hacker “gold mine.”61 ultimately, the pence kobach commission’s attempt to gather all states’ voter rolls was so concerning that 48 states partially or fully refused to comply. by january 2018, less than seven months after the commission was convened, trump disbanded it, citing states’ refusal to hand over their voters’ data and the legal battles the commission faced. while other actors have rightfully undertaken serious efforts to ensure election security, the pence kobach commission was a classic example of the wrong people with the wrong goals and wrong skills taking on an important and sensitive enterprise. a second trump administration would likely again lead to the politicization of election security, with true concern for protecting our electoral system and voters being wholly subordinated to political ends. policy details from project 2025 indicate that a second trump administration would try to force states to allow the administration to gather their voter rolls by making federal funding contingent on such access. sowing doubt about state voter list maintenance practices is an increasingly common tactic in the playbook to undermine voter confidence in elections. under section 8 of the nvra, state election officials must conduct list maintenance of the voter rolls to ensure their accuracy by conducting “a general program that makes a reasonable effort to remove names of ineligible voters.” most officials take their duties seriously and work in earnest to keep voter lists up to date. still, numerous lawsuits have been brought to challenge officials’ voter list maintenance practices as inadequate under the nvra. while everyone agrees that list maintenance   when done responsibly   is proper and needed, attempts to use section 8 to force states and localities to take more aggressive action too often leverage unreliable data and faulty processes and procedures that would erroneously cancel the registrations of properly registered voters. a trump doj is likely to bring similar overreaching lawsuits   a tactic employed during the second bush administration69   and use the doj’s power to play into an election denial narrative and risk disenfranchising eligible voters through aggressive voter purges. with its marching orders from influential trump allies, a trump doj could go even further, criminalizing voters and election workers. in addition to efforts to gather statewide rolls to force purges of voters, a second trump administration may also use such information to target voters for sham investigations and aggressive criminal prosecution, a known goal of trump and his allies. and project 2025 has called for the doj to reassign responsibility to prosecute violations of 18 u.s.c. § 241 for alleged “voter registration fraud” and “unlawful ballot correction” from the civil rights division to the criminal division   essentially, to criminalize the voting process. the proposed change sets up the doj to use the threat of criminal prosecution to intimidate state and local election workers. 18 u.s.c. § 241 is a reconstruction era provision meant to prevent bad actors like the ku klux klan from intimidating voters that makes it “unlawful… to injury, threaten or intimidate” a person in the exercise of their constitutional rights. trump allies would have the doj pervert this criminal statute aimed at protecting voters to instead threaten election administrators who take actions that protect access to the ballot with criminal prosecution, criminalizing what are functionally election administration disputes. as before, if a second trump administration uses the president’s authority to establish a body staffed with known vote suppressors aimed at fueling the false narrative of illegal voting or gathering information that can be weaponized against voters, the courts offer a path to stop or check its actions. federal commissions must comply with federal law, including the federal advisory committee act (faca) and the administrative procedure act (apa). faca requires commissions to be transparent about their work and give the public notice of their activities. it also instructs that the president must “require the membership of [an] advisory committee to be fairly balanced in terms of the points of view represented and the functions to be performed” and “contain appropriate provisions to assure that [its] advice and recommendations...will not be inappropriately influenced...”. this law provides pathways to challenge inappropriately constituted presidential or executive commissions. likewise, the apa provides a mechanism for judicial review. advisory commissions commonly do their work through federal agencies. for instance, the general services administration was tasked with providing funds, staffing, and other support to the pence kobach commission. agencies, in turn, must comply with federal law. when they do not, the apa provides a cause of action, including to enforce compliance with faca. actions to enforce privacy protections may also halt reckless attempts to gather and weaponize voter’s sensitive information, as the pence kobach commission threatened to do. state court litigation to enforce existing state law protections is one path to stymie actions like those of the pence kobach commission. for example, litigation brought in texas state court resulted in an injunction preventing the state from transmitting large portions of voter roll data to the pence kobach commission. these actions can also be stymied by federal suits seeking to ensure compliance with federal laws that lay out specific processes to follow before gathering sensitive data. the aclu also stands ready to block efforts by a trump doj or other emboldened allies to use manufactured voter fraud narratives as pretext to force aggressive voter purges. efforts by the doj or trump aligned groups to compel jurisdictions to overzealously purge voter rolls by claiming that the nvra requires aggressive list maintenance would, in fact, distort federal law. courts have already rejected or dismissed these kinds of aggressive suits when states’ or local election officials’ maintenance efforts have been reasonable. we have successfully defended against such overreach before and are ready to do so again, representing impacted voters or community organizations and intervening in cases against elections officials to ensure that voter roll maintenance does not improperly remove eligible voters. moreover, if state and local government trump allies are emboldened to pursue more aggressive purge practices, we have substantial experience successfully challenging those actions in court and will continue to meet those threats. congress can serve as an essential check to any trump convened commission or executive action. we will urge congress to embrace its oversight authority to impede potential abuses of power. for one, depending on the scope of any such commission or other executive action, additional federal appropriations may be required to carry out its goal. we will insist that congress reject appropriations for a pence kobach style commission or other similar executive activity aimed at spreading conspiracy theories to justify voter suppression and ensure that other federal dollars are not misappropriated to support it. we will also push congressional oversight committees to conduct investigations into any commission or executive action. such oversight will provide the american people with a transparent view of the commission’s activities and communications, exposing any political motivations driving the commission or its attacks on the right to vote. as we fight back in the halls of congress, we will also organize a robust outside game with our members across the country who will not stand idly by if a sham commission proceeds, but will rather activate to raise awareness of the true intent of the commission, apply pressure to their congressional delegation, and work to combat false narratives aimed at justifying suppressive voting measures and undercutting faith and participation in our elections. state and local elected officials must also serve as a firewall against any potential commission or executive action. as we saw last time, election officials from both parties refused to turn over at least some portions of the pence  kobach commission’s requested information, stymieing its ability to undertake its planned scheme: to match voter rolls against federal databases to target voters for purges and prosecution, and provide fodder to justify discriminatory anti voter measures. the success of any future attempts to conduct similar database matching or implement voter purges relies on state cooperation since each state maintains its own statewide voter database. this is not information the federal government holds, and state election officials must deny any commission requests to share voter information. because public pressure will play a critical role in preventing compliance with any possible commission’s data requests, we will activate our members and volunteers nationwide to pressure their state and local elected officials to protect their state’s voter rolls and data. further, if trump uses his federal office and megaphone to encourage suppressive policies that will impact marginalized communities, states can and must erect a strong defense. immediately enacting state vras that are modeled after and supplement the federal vra will provide a protective shield from trump’s agenda for traditionally marginalized voters. generally, state vras prohibit election officials from implementing discriminatory voting policies and practices. we have already been working with our affiliates and allies in states across the country to pass these vital state level protections, and we will proactively double down on these pro voter measures during a trump presidency. finally, we will hold election deniers accountable. our voter education work in 2022 demonstrates that voters will choose secretaries of state and election officials who believe in free and fair elections, not those who will use the office to spread the big lie. we will continue to ensure voters know candidates’ positions and what is at stake in elections for election officials. past efforts to boost the false narrative of illegal voting, justify voter suppression, and undermine faith in our elections can also be used to level threats and false accusations against voters and election workers alike. trump allies are specifically focused on using the mantle of the doj to endorse and spread false claims of widespread voter fraud in order to fuel these efforts. indeed, jeffrey clark, whom trump considered installing as acting attorney general in the waning days of his first term, has drafted an analysis charting a path for direct presidential control of federal law enforcement   control that would enable trump to actualize his threats to bring federal law enforcement to the polls and bring unwarranted investigations and prosecutions of voters, election workers, and others to advance his political agenda. in the past, trump has maligned election workers in key states to sow doubt in our electoral system and attempt to overturn results. coupled with trump’s willingness to deploy federal law enforcement resources, these smears strongly suggest that he would use the same tactics to interfere in our elections and intimidate voters and election workers. unfortunately, trump has used federal law enforcement improperly before. under the guise of protecting federal property and fighting crime, trump deployed fbi, drug enforcement administration, u.s. marshals service, and department of homeland security agents to american cities during the 2020 racial justice protests. soon after, trump’s deployment of federal agents became a key campaign theme to convey his purported commitment to law and order: in a july 2020 interview, he said he was ready to dispatch 75,000 federal agents into american cities. trump’s focus on false “law and order” narratives, interfering with election integrity and threatening rhetoric has not waned. indeed, trump has suggested that whether there will be violence in the upcoming election depends on whether he wins and “on the fairness of the election”   phrasing he has invoked to mean the same thing. moreover, trump contests elections both when he wins and when he loses. in a second trump administration, election workers and voters are vulnerable targets in any effort to bend electoral outcomes to trump’s will. trump’s false accusations against two fulton county election workers during the 2020 election underscore what’s at stake. after trump’s campaign lawyer rudy giuliani falsely stated that wandrea moss and ruby freeman cheated trump by adding fake ballots at a ballot counting center, the two women received hundreds of threatening emails, text messages, and phone calls from trump allies. in a leaked january 2, 2021 phone call to georgia secretary of state brad raffensperger, trump repeated these lies. these election workers eventually won a defamation lawsuit against giuliani, proving that their lives were recklessly upended by flat lies. the damage wrought extended far beyond moss and freeman; faced with constant threats and harassment, other election workers for fulton county quit altogether. countless election workers have faced ongoing harassment and physical threats since the 2020 election. the latest edition of the brennan center’s annual survey of election officials found that 38 percent of local election officials experienced threats, harassment, or abuse for doing their jobs and more than half were concerned about the safety of their colleagues and staff. this abuse has fueled a mass exodus: more than one third of local election officials know at least one person who resigned at least in part due to safety concerns; the brennan center estimates that about one in four will be administering their first presidential election this year. and according to a bipartisan policy center report, turnover among top election workers   people in charge of administering voting   has grown from 28 percent in 2004 to 39 percent in 2022. when viewed in the aggregate, the widespread abuse of election workers   driven by lies about election fraud   threatens the stability and functioning of our democracy. nowhere is this threat greater than in states with close elections. according to the doj’s election threats task force, 58 percent of the over 1,000 threats reviewed were in states that underwent 2020 post election lawsuits, recounts, and audits, including arizona, colorado, georgia, michigan, nevada, pennsylvania, and wisconsin. to date, 20 people have been charged with crimes relating to threatening election officials and election officials anticipate that these threats will only increase. voters are also at risk for intimidation driven by trump’s fixation on his 2020 loss. in the run up to the 2024 election, trump has continued to advance his claim that the 2020 election was stolen, describing those who do not support him as “vermin” who “lie and steal and cheat on elections.” beyond the intimidating rhetoric that characterizes the trump campaign   including dehumanizing voters and opponents and calling for law enforcement at the polls   trump and his allies have indicated they intend to increase criminal prosecutions related to voting. lies surrounding the 2020 election have also led certain states to create new investigatory arms aimed at voters. these threats of criminal prosecution create an atmosphere of intimidation for voters seeking to exercise their constitutional right. a second trump administration would also have broad resources to turn this heated rhetoric into enforceable policy. trump’s use of federal law enforcement and the national guard in response to the 2020 racial justice protests suggests he would be willing to similarly deploy agents to interfere in elections. to respond to protests at or near polling locations or to purportedly protect the right to vote under the guise of false election fraud allegations, trump might improperly deploy federal law enforcement agents to monitor the administration of elections in majority minority communities, stop the counting of mail in ballots, or to create a hostile environment for voters or election workers. these actions would have a major suppressive effect on voting, especially in communities of color. should a second trump administration deploy federal law enforcement officers, the national guard, or other military personnel to intimidate voters or election workers, the aclu has legal tools and can meet the effort in the courts. several laws, including federal criminal law, make it unlawful for armed forces or other federal agents to interfere in any way with voting. 18 u.s.c. § 592 bars deploying troops or federal civil agents to voting sites. 18 u.s.c. § 593 prohibits the armed forces from interfering with voting or with election workers conducting their duties. and 18 u.s.c. § 594 criminalizes actual or attempted voter intimidation. should a trump administration attempt to justify such use of federal armed forces or law enforcement agents under the narrow statutory exception that such forces can be deployed to “repel armed enemies of the united states,” grave legal concerns remain. the notion that standing armed forces cannot be used for domestic security reflects a firmly rooted “resistance of americans to any military intrusion into civilian affairs.” by itself, military involvement in civil affairs undermines our democracy and threatens civil liberties. in addition to certain constitutional principles, the posse comitatus act generally forbids the use of federal military personnel for civilian law enforcement unless authorized by congress. congress strengthened the act in 2022 and 2023 in response to the trump administration’s use of active duty military to respond to protests against police violence. a more fulsome discussion of the aclu’s response to trump’s use of federal law enforcement or military forces domestically is in our forthcoming memo, “trump on surveillance, protest, and free speech.” deploying federal agents to intervene in elections violates numerous federal statutes, including 18 u.s.c. § 594, the ku klux klan (kkk) act, and section 11(b) of the vra. section 594 criminalizes both actual and attempted intimidation, threats, or coercion related to the exercise of someone’s vote. two provisions of the kkk act protect against election interference. first, the kkk act’s “support or advocacy clause” protects voters’ “right to support candidates in federal elections” and prohibits “force, intimidation, or threat[s]” aimed at preventing the exercise of that right. second, the act provides protection against the deprivation of “equal protection of the laws.” both clauses forbid the kind of intimidation of voters and election workers at issue. and section 11(b) of the vra explicitly proscribes voter intimidation by anyone, “whether acting under color of law or othewise,” providing another pathway for court intervention. the supreme court has “long held” that injunctive relief can be granted against federal officers “who are violating, or planning to violate, federal law.” in addition to these statutes, a host of other federal and state laws prohibit interference with voting or other forms of voter coercion or intimidation. defamation actions, which come with substantial monetary damages, also have the potential to serve as deterrents to bad actors spreading lies about election workers. after lies were spread about them following the 2020 election, fulton county election workers freeman and moss brought defamation actions against the one america news network (oan) and giuliani, resulting in settlement with oan130 and more than $145 million in damages against giuliani. substantial damages awards can be a key tool to prevent similar bad actors in the future. if trump attempts to weaponize federal law enforcement to intimidate voters and election officials, we will activate our members and supporters to push congress to fight back. this includes demanding that congress leverages the appropriations process to hamstring this destructive and anti democratic use of federal law enforcement or military resources. we will also demand that congress use its oversight powers to expose any agency plans to violate federal law at trump’s direction to intimidate voters and interfere with election administration. state and local elected officials must also serve as a bulwark against the intimidation of election workers and voters. election administration takes place at the local level, and the aclu will continue advocating for states to provide local election officials with ample and consistent funding every appropriations cycle for election worker training, resources to counter trump’s election lies, and ensuring the safety of election officials. additionally, we will activate our supporters and work in broad coalition to push states to implement policies prohibiting state and local law enforcement agencies from assisting or cooperating with attempts to send federal law enforcement anywhere near voting locations to intimidate voters and election workers. we will also leverage our organizing resources to make sure states implement trainings and policies for local law enforcement on how to engage with polling locations to ensure they will not have a suppressive impact. in march 2021, the biden administration issued executive order 14019 on promoting access to voting. the executive order encourages federal agencies to promote nonpartisan voter registration opportunities for all eligible citizens pursuant to longstanding federal law   namely, the bipartisan nvra. the executive order directs the federal government to live up to the nvra’s declaration that government at every level, including the federal government, has a duty to increase opportunities for all eligible americans to register and vote. since 2021, some agencies have taken steps toward offering voter registration services under the nvra to the millions of eligible citizens that receive services directly from the federal government. this progress includes adding voter registration opportunities in indian health service clinics and veterans affairs medical centers that will increase access for tribal communities and veterans. however, as indicated by the relentless attacks of trump’s allies in congress and elsewhere seeking to block implementation of this executive order, trump would likely rescind the executive order and direct agencies to reverse the progress that has been made to date. such rollbacks on progress may also extend to rescinding invaluable, long standing guidance issued by the doj through past administrations   a tactic employed by the first trump administration. doj guidance has helped to further proper implementation of federal civil rights statutes, ensuring access to registration and voting for eligible citizens who often face undue burdens while trying to vote, including persons with disabilities or in need of language assistance. for example, as part of the executive order 14019, the doj issued new guidance to the federal bureau of prisons, a part of the doj, on ways to ensure that all eligible individuals in federal custody have access to voter registration. this guidance will help ensure that eligible voters in federal custody are not disenfranchised and serve as a model for state election officials. besides nullifying any progress made under the executive order, trump will also attempt to push restrictive voting legislation through congress and in the states. already, trump and his allies are promoting policies that make it harder to register to vote, like the safeguard american voter eligibility (save) act. the save act is proposed federal legislation that would require potential voters to produce documentary proof of citizenship. given that all individuals must already swear under penalty of law to their citizenship when registering to vote, this burdensome step erects unnecessary   and in too many cases, insurmountable   additional barriers to voting. indeed, a recent study found that a documentary proof of citizenship requirement to register to vote would exclude millions of americans from the political process. and when the aclu challenged a similar requirement championed by kobach in kansas, it was struck down as an unconstitutional burden on the fundamental right to vote. we will meet any reversals on federal progress on voting access by shoring up existing voter registration opportunities and continuing and intensifying our challenges to suppressive voting rules and policies. the aclu is one of the few organizations that maintains a full and active docket on enforcing compliance with states’ mandatory obligations under the nvra to provide voter registration opportunities through state motor vehicles agencies and certain other state and local agencies, including public assistance and disability offices. if a second trump administration and allies endeavor to rollback federal progress on voter registration or encourage states to shirk their nvra mandated responsibilities, we will ramp up our enforcement efforts, and challenge in court attempts to circumvent these requirements. in addition to our litigation to stop voter suppression, we will also amplify our work to protect civic organizations and individuals who work on the ground to help voters navigate and overcome the many barriers to access, using all tools at our disposal, including federal protections like the first and fourteenth amendments, the americans with disabilities act of 1990, and vra provisions that protect voter assistance and language assistance. we will also continue to build on our state court practice, challenging barriers to voter registration and ballot access under state constitutions and state laws that may provide independent voting rights protections. although trump will seek to undo federal progress on voting access via executive action, we will utilize our lobbying and organizing resources to push congress to use the power of the purse to stop or delay these rollbacks. we will demand that, through each appropriations cycle, pro voter members of congress fight to secure policies that prohibit or discourage federal agencies from reversing major initiatives already in effect under the executive order, including defunding these reversals. additionally, we will insist that legislators stand firm against any federal bills that erect new barriers to registration and voting, including any documentary proof of citizenship requirements. furthermore, we will push congressional oversight committees to use their investigation and oversight authority to expose and slow down agency efforts to reverse actions implemented under the executive order. the aclu will activate our members and supporters around the country to push states and localities to mitigate the harm of any reversals of federal progress under the executive order or other attacks on voter registration access. because voter registration and voting rules are primarily within states and local election officials’ authority, we will utilize our lobbying and organizing resources to ensure that states and localities do everything they can to increase registration opportunities and voter education across state and local government. for one, we will advocate for state legislation or executive orders that expand the state and local agencies that offer voter registration opportunities and voter education in interactions with the residents they serve. we also have a long history of spearheading successful campaigns to secure impactful policies that expand voting access   like same day registration, automatic voter registration, voting rights restoration, and no excuse and permanent absentee voting   and we will continue to push state legislation and ballot measures to increase voter access. since trump’s first successful election and presidency, american democracy has experienced sustained assaults that continue to test the strength of its foundations. and in the years since, trump and his allies have continued to push the limits of our democratic institutions and values. but despite trump’s sustained efforts, democracy supporting americans and residents from every walk of life continue to fight tirelessly to counter trump’s election lies and preserve and strengthen our democratic institutions and our right to vote. the aclu stands stronger and more prepared than ever to counter trump’s authoritarianism, abuses of power, and anti voter policies. we will not stop fighting in the courts, in congress and statehouses, and alongside the most marginalized communities to strengthen our democracy for generations to come and secure equal, unimpeded access to the ballot for every voter. for information on copyright, usage rights, and privacy, please visit the aclu site user agreement at https://www.aclu.org/about/aclu site user agreement. for information on accessibility, please visit the aclu statement on website accessibility at https://www.aclu.org/about/aclu statement accessibility. citations and endnotes can be found in the full, downloadable pdf.

lisa desjardins lisa desjardins leave your feedback for more politics coverage and analysis, sign up for here’s the deal, our weekly politics newsletter, here. former president donald trump is known for his off script moments. but his signature freewheeling banter also masks important consistency. he is, actually, predictable. listening to his recent on the campaign trail speeches reveals some patterns: the latter is where we want to focus today: what trump is saying he will do. thank you. please check your inbox to confirm. the republican presidential nominee rarely commits to details or specifics. this is not unique to him as a politician, but trump has a particularly pronounced form. his personal disregard for long policy briefs and policy intricacies is well known. trump’s primary approach as a politician is operating by instinct. thus, the question of what trump himself proposes is a critical one. we analyzed three rally speeches following president joe biden’s withdrawal from the 2024 race. he made nearly the same promises at each one, each time a cap to his stump speech. below is a full list of what trump promised, alongside some context. of course, this is not a comprehensive list of every promise trump has made, rather, a focused look at what he is promising right now on the campaign trail. a quick note: for some items, we have left the reader to interpret for themselves. those are broad pledges that are straightforward, but not detailed such as, “i will keep you out of wars,” or, “i will prevent world war iii.” context: trump is pledging to deploy a “massive dragnet” to arrest and deport millions of undocumented migrants. he has told crowds, and time magazine in april, that he would use local law enforcement to do this as well as, potentially, the national guard and active duty military. he has not offered more specifics about how any of those mechanisms would work. he has indicated in his speeches that he would first target “criminals,” mentioning violent crimes like murder and rape. this is not a new pledge. trump promised mass deportations as part of his 2016 campaign. context: trump has promised to restore some of his hardline immigration policies that the biden administration has reversed. he gave a run down of this in minnesota, saying, “i will restore the travel ban, suspend refugee admissions, stop the resettlement, and keep the terrorists the hell out of our country.” trump’s initial ban of people arriving from muslim countries was ruled unconstitutional, but he revised it to focus on potential threats, though it still largely included muslim countries. in addition, trump would bring back “remain in mexico,” which aimed to force asylum seekers to wait in mexico before they could cross into the united states to claim asylum. that policy has faced legal, human rights and political pushback on both sides of the border. trump has also indicated he may try to use title 42 emergency powers for immigration purposes, especially in returning child migrants to families. and he has left open the idea of again separating migrant families, though a court has ruled that policy cannot restart during the next administration. supporters listen to former u.s. president donald trump, the republican presidential nominee, speak at a july rally in harrisburg, pennsylvania. photo by spencer platt/getty images a pledge to end inflation ranks high on the 2024 republican party platform, though inflation has been down. and as for the promise to “make america affordable again”? with trump offering no specifics, that’s up for interpretation. context: as readers may know, the green new deal is a set of progressive left climate and workplace ideas, most concretely written into legislative proposals by sen. ed markey, d mass., and rep. alexandria ocasio cortez, d n.y. the green new deal is not u.s. law, but trump is using it in speeches to bash an unspecified range of ideas from the “radical left.” regarding evs, biden put in place a new federal regulation in march that required automakers to increase fuel efficiency of their cars substantially over a number of years. that requirement would force many car companies to convert vehicles to electric or partially electric to meet the standard. biden’s policy has faced an avalanche of lawsuits already. some believe it may be legally doomed, regardless of who becomes president, following a recent supreme court ruling. context: this is a complicated area. trump wants to extend the tax cuts and jobs act tax cuts that went in place during his administration, but they’re set to expire in 2025. this would affect millions of americans. some 80 percent of households saw a tax cut in 2018 because of the tcja, according to the nonpartisan tax policy center. this would not be a new tax cut, but rather a proposal to stop taxes from going up. trump does not mention this in his speeches, but politico has reported that he has told business leaders he would like to lower corporate taxes, which will keep their 2017 tax cuts regardless. those do not expire. at the same time, cnbc has reported that trump, in a meeting with house republicans, raised the idea of replacing individual income taxes with an “all tariff policy.” that idea has met with sharp pushback from some economists who say it is mathematically impossible and that tariffs generally have a regressive effect   they hurt working classes the most. (see below for more on tariffs.) his tips idea is more straightforward. trump wants to end taxation on income earned by tips. (this would require congressional action to move forward.) the washington post found that more than 6 million workers reported tips to the irs in 2018. at the same time, this idea could cost some $150 to $250 billion in federal revenue over 10 years, per the committee for a responsible federal budget. context: china was granted permanent and “most favored” trade status in 2001 by republican president george w. bush, meaning the u.s. generally should offer china trade terms that are as good as any other trading partner with the u.s. context: trump explains this concept succinctly here. he would lean into any tariff war, retaliating “eye for an eye” for a tariff imposed by other countries. trump argues that this will protect american jobs, especially in manufacturing and other competitive industries. but others, including the libertarian leaning cato institute, say it would end up being an economic mistake, raising prices for american consumers across the board and harming workers the most. context: world war iii has been mentioned a ton in trump speeches. in drawing a contrast between biden and himself in their first presidential debate, trump warned viewers that the president would draw the country further into global conflict. now facing off against vice president kamala harris, trump has continued to invoke the specter of a third world war. here’s how he put it in his speech in charlotte, north carolina: “i will prevent world war iii. we’re heading to world war iii, we’re heading right into the teeth of it … i will restore peace through strength.” note: in minnesota, trump said “it will be entirely made in minnesota … minnesota has got a big piece of it. context: trump is referencing israel’s project iron dome, a series of missile defense capabilities that aim to destroy short range weapons launched against the country. it is not clear what threats trump aims the dome to address, with some experts pointing out that the contiguous u.s. is surrounded by allied countries and oceans. intelligence officials said china was responsible for a spy balloon that sailed over the country in 2023 before it was shot down by current military capabilities. minnesota is the nation’s leading producer of iron ore. republican presidential nominee and former president donald trump attends a campaign rally in st cloud, minnesota, on july 27. photo by stephen maturen/getty images context: social security’s trust funds will be depleted by 2035, according to this year’s trustees report. at that point, without any action by lawmakers in washington, payments to seniors will be cut by 27 percent. medicare’s hospital trust fund would go broke in 2036 under the current policy. there are a few ways to provide solvency, but increasingly all involve some pain   increasing retirement age, cutting benefits or increasing what some or all americans must contribute. trump’s promise misses the important context that without any action, there will be cuts to these benefits. context: trump said this in st. cloud, minnesota, only. trump asserted that most military generals are not “woke,” but that some are. trump is pledging to get rid of those who are “woke.” context: trump says he would work with democratic mayors and governors to achieve this, but has not provided details. trump regularly raises concerns about crime in america, especially in cities. politifact checked these statements and found trump’s words about rising crime rates to be “mostly false,” because violent crime rates have fallen for most of the country. property crime has risen, including car thefts. in addition, the conservative american enterprise institute has written about data showing that urban americans are slightly more likely to say they’re “pretty happy” with their lives than rural americans. context: trump’s vision for the nation’s capital is to require traditional and neoclassical architecture, based on renaissance ideas of greco roman aesthetics. as he was exiting his presidency in late 2020, he issued an executive order declaring that the federal government has “largely stopped building beautiful buildings” and that in d.c., “classical architecture shall be the preferred and default architecture for federal public buildings.” in these rally speeches, trump has also said of d.c. that “we are going to take over the management, the leadership of it.” residents of the nation’s capital do not have a vote in congress, but for 50 years congress has allowed them “home rule,” so that their city council can generally oversee how the city operates. congress and the white house retain a kind of veto power. trump allies and pushing to end d.c. home rule. this may be what he is implying here. context: there is a lot to unpack here. but trump has largely not defined precisely which policies he would attempt to penalize. at the same time, there is a legal battle over interpretations of biden administration rules that declare title ix protections based on sex include safeguards for lgbtq+ youth. trump’s policies would need to follow federal court guidance, once established. context: see this helpful segment from white house correspondent laura barrón lópez. in short, medical experts say the implications of eliminating vaccine mandates would be enormous for schools and for public health. context: trump is proposing a ban on transgender women from participating in women’s sports. when he speaks about this, he largely refers to youth sports. see above, regarding trans youth. context: trump has indicated that he would oppose most, if not all, new restrictions on gun usage and ownership. context: on abortion, trump supports the current status quo, that is to say that states have the right to restrict or nearly ban abortion as they choose. this stance on abortion has put him at odds with some of his base voters who would like a national ban. but trump has indicated he would not support that. a side note: trump does not usually use the word “abortion” in his speeches. instead he nods to the issue, as well as others, by using this broad phrasing. context: this short phrase leads to an extensive plan for “free speech” reform that trump announced in 2022. he would use presidential power to limit what rules federal agencies, universities and tech companies could employ to address speech, including controversial ideas. trump, alongside other right wing figures and his supporters, have made continuous claims that a combination of news media, social media platforms and a “deep state” arm of the government have sought to suppress their speech. trump has been a major purveyor of “the big lie”   that the 2020 election was “stolen” and he was the real winner. biden won the election. despite trump’s insistence that he was the actual victor, courts on the state and federal level confirmed the outcome of the election in biden’s favor. in fact, biden broke the record for the most total votes cast for a u.s. presidential candidate, a record previously set by barack obama in 2008. context: this promise echoes the official republican party platform of securing elections by calling for same day voting, paper ballots, proof of citizenship and voter identification. at the same time, republican leaders have urged voters to use all available options for casting their ballots, like absentee or mail in voting. trump has falsely claimed that voting by mail or using drop boxes is less secure and, thus, more open to mass voter fraud. (it’s not.) trump, since losing the 2020 election to biden, has repeatedly cast doubt on the outcome and integrity of the last presidential contest. trump delivered combative remarks and baseless claims of voter fraud to supporters, including moments before the jan. 6 insurrection. part of his reelection message to his base has been to “guard the vote.” this has raised alarm bells over safeguarding democracy and elections and escalated concerns about voter intimidation and election workers during november’s election. left: former president donald trump attends a july campaign rally in st cloud, minnesota. photo by stephen maturen/getty images by laura santhanam by jennifer peltz, associated press by lindsay whitehurst, associated press by richard lardner, associated press lisa desjardins lisa desjardins lisa desjardins is a correspondent for pbs news hour, where she covers news from the u.s. capitol while also traveling across the country to report on how decisions in washington affect people where they live and work. support provided by: learn more thank you. please check your inbox to confirm. politics aug 03 © 1996   2025 newshour productions llc. all rights reserved. pbs is a 501(c)(3) not for profit organization. sections about stay connected thank you. please check your inbox to confirm. learn more about friends of the news hour. support for news hour provided by

donald trump's victory was made possible by a confluence of factors and will have implications domestically and abroad that "are hard to overstate," uc berkeley experts say. by edward lempinen, jason pohl, lila thulin julia demaree nikhinson via ap november 6, 2024 former president donald trump has decisively won reelection to the white house, a political outcome that began reverberating around the globe in the hours after the polls closed tuesday. after polling for weeks had shown a too close to call race that might take days to conclude, trump’s clear win struck many as a shock. analysts will likely need years to fully understand the forces that drove his return to power. but on the day after, top uc berkeley scholars offer a sharp and sometimes unsettling assessment of the dynamics at play. some cite trump’s appeal to white voters, who looked past the insurrection against democracy on jan. 6, 2021. one says that americans are not ready to trust a woman with presidential power. and others say trump’s victory reflects a global rage against political leadership and warn that it could help fuel a new era of global instability. below, read a full range of responses to the election results by uc berkeley experts in political science, sociology, international relations and other fields. there are many takeaways from the election results. but the most important implication is that just four years after the jan. 6 insurrection, former president trump will be back in the white house   now surrounded by staff and agency leaders who will be more committed to him both personally and to his agenda. with a republican senate (and likely house), he will be able to make some major legislative changes, especially when it comes to taxes. but as head of the executive branch, he will be in a position to act unilaterally on a host of other issues, pushing the limits of presidential power. with a supportive supreme court, the implications for policy and governance are hard to overstate.   eric schickler, political scientist and co director of the uc berkeley institute of governmental studies (igs) i see the outcome of the presidential election fundamentally as an expression of anger about the state of the economy. as the saying goes, “it is the economy, stupid.” the economy is working well for some groups of people, to be sure, but there are different economies for different sets of people. but it’s also not just “the economy, stupid.” i would never discount the racist and misogynist rejection of a black and south asian woman; the deliberately circulated fears and lies that fed the wounded racial and masculine identity of particular demographic groups; the willingness of some immigrants to shut the door behind them; and the bogey figure of “trans” that came to stand in for historic changes that were hard to grapple with. neither would i discount the effect of the global conflicts in which america is implicated. but at the end of the day, i do not believe that these results would have occurred if large populations of americans did not worry about the cost of groceries, utilities and rents. the success of a political party depends on its responsiveness to its constituents   not just as a pool of votes, but also to the social and political movements through which they express themselves. there are lessons here that the democratic party has, unfortunately, consistently failed to heed.   raka ray, dean of uc berkeley social sciences and professor of sociology and south asian studies there has been much discussion this election about growing support for trump among non white voters, but little focus on the ongoing and growing support for trump among white voters, particularly white women. many pundits assumed white women would turn out for harris because of their concerns about reproductive justice. yet, we must remember that white women have only voted democratic once in the past 50 years: that was in 1996, in favor of bill clinton. looking at voters of color, although it is true that latine men seemed to be more supportive of trump this cycle, i would be very skeptical of exit poll results that are significantly different from high quality survey results taken shortly before the election. exit polls have many methodological problems and are particularly bad at identifying trends within ethno racial subpopulations. in october, latine polling by equis research found about 55% latine support for harris in the battleground states, with stronger support among latina women. there is no reason to believe things looked significantly different on election day. a more useful question is to consider the reasons underlying trump’s appeal to voters. many pundits have questioned how voters could support trump in spite of his racist and misogynist statements. i would argue that many voters supported him because of these assertions. it was not only that many saw those controversial words as proof of his willingness to speak the “truth.” for some voters, trump’s words made them feel powerful, gave them someone to blame for their problems, and made them feel confident he could fix them.   lisa garcía bedolla, political scientist, vice provost for graduate studies and dean of the graduate division among the many sociocultural factors affecting presidential elections, gender has been a defining dynamic for the last three cycles, with voters facing choices between male and female candidates for both presidential and vice presidential positions. the gender dynamics of the most recent election were intensified by contentious debates over reproductive rights and their disproportionate impact on women, as well as by one candidate’s explicit embrace of hypermasculinity. two fundamental questions emerged: whether voters would choose between dominant versus prestigious leadership styles, and whether america was ready to advance toward greater gender equality by electing a woman to the world’s most powerful position. the results appear to confirm that most american voters still implicitly endorse traditional gender hierarchies in political leadership, maintaining a system where men hold predominant power and authority. the voting patterns across these recent elections reflect deeper societal dynamics around gender and power, suggesting that our society remains more comfortable with women in supporting roles rather than as the primary decision maker, metaphorically preferring men at the helm while women occupy the passenger seat. while americans may support women’s advancement in principle, electoral behavior continues to reflect weak implicit (and explicit) associations between the concepts of women and power.   laura kray, psychologist and director of the center for equity, gender, and leadership at the haas school of business throughout their presidential campaign, the republican party used   which is to say produced   an atmosphere of anti trans hate to move people to the polls, and it seems to have worked. for years, a coalition which includes many self identified conservatives, along with their liberal co conspirators, have seeded a trans panic on the local level, whether at school boards, libraries, sports fields and medical facilities. as i’ve argued in my most recent book, anti trans hate is so wildly successful because it makes the public fearfully obsessed with trans people. ironically, many conservative commentators spend more hours per day talking about gender than i do as a professor who studies it. of course, much of what they say is factually incorrect. however, they own the means of distribution, and so it is received as truth. that said, anti trans antagonism is a bipartisan affair. while the republicans have been loud and clear about their will to eradicate trans people, democrats have remained mostly silent. one could speculate that they fear the vitriol many of us survive, or perhaps they passively agree. either way, it is illustrative of the democratic party’s move further toward the right which helped them lose the election.   eric a. stanley, haas distinguished chair in lgbt equity harris launched strong, but after her great performance in the sept. 10 debate, she and her party reverted to their ultra risk averse, low dominance ways. harris largely dropped the hard edged, provocative spirit of her dnc speech and the debate. in interviews, she offered evasive, scripted, chutzpah free answers, creating the impression that she was just a typical politician. instead of staying on offense and limiting their attention to trump largely to ridiculing him, the democrats fell back on their timeworn, futile tactic of ceding the spotlight to him, repeating his outrageous statements and enjoining everyone to be fearful and offended. rather than forcefully celebrating the roaring economy, harris remained wedded to the 21st century democrats’ delusion that you score more points   even when the economy is sizzling and you’re in power   by expressing sympathy for supposedly suffering voters. harris could have honored americans’ bootstrap mentality and leveraged their patriotism, casting her program as a pro growth dynamo that would send wages and corporate profits soaring and ensure that the american economy continues to leave the rest of the world in the dust. instead, she played santa claus: a $50,000 tax credit for first time business starters, $25,000 for first time homebuyers, a $6,000 credit for newborns. harris is a strong leader and a diehard patriot, and trump is a coward at heart and a traitor to boot. tragically, the democrats neglected to show it.   m. steven fish, political scientist, author of “comeback: routing trumpism, reclaiming the nation, and restoring democracy’s edge” democratic institutions in the u.s. continue to be under strain. it is a challenge for any country to have a national executive who has attempted to subvert a previous election. one concern is that the executive branch will use its authority to influence the administration of the 2026 midterms and 2028 presidential elections. a second concern is that the reelection of a politician who has attempted election subversion will incentivize and embolden other politicians to threaten the rule of law and peaceful transfer of power. a third concern is that the “stop the steal” conspiracy about the 2020 election will continue to be popular, leading to further distrust in u.s. election administration. this election has made clear that a majority of americans are willing to vote for a candidate who threatens the rule of law, a serious concern of the founders.   jacob grumbach, political scientist, leader of the democracy policy lab at the goldman school of public policy the united states has always been a nation of conspiracy theorists, and once again we will have a conspiracy theorist in chief. american politics have long been shaped by fears of conspiracy, from the colonial era illuminati to henry ford’s antisemitism. in 1965, historian richard hofstadter critiqued the “paranoid style” of demagogues and populists on the (mostly right wing) fringe as the price society paid for consensus at the “vital center.” but in the post 9/11 era, these fringes have conquered whatever remained of liberal society. trump began his political rise with the “birther” conspiracy. his muslim ban and border wall were not just nativist slogans, but solutions to the perceived threat of infiltrators seeking to “replace” white voters. and there was the “big lie” of 2020, in which massive voter fraud (now magically vanquished) prevented his re election. this new administration will be staffed with conspiracy theorists like stephen miller and rfk jr., who promise to deliver trump’s vengeance. within the grip of paranoia, every accusation is both projection and a confession, and those who imagine themselves victims of conspiracy tend to conspire against others. but now, instead of this being a fringe fantasy, trump’s authoritarian, if not openly fascist, conspiracy theories will be backed by the might of the american empire.   michael mark cohen, associate teaching professor of american studies and african american studies donald trump’s election fits a pattern of populist nationalist insurgencies that have roiled democracies in the decade since britain’s choice for brexit. populist nationalists, as i would call them, have won elections in europe, latin america and south and southeast asia. their insurgencies reflect impatience with incumbents and prevailing policies, but not with democracy itself. democracy encompasses many varieties of politics, after all, and what we see in this populist nationalist groundswell is a majoritarian reaction against the liberal democratic synthesis that achieved broad global influence in the late 20th century. put in broader perspective, the efforts of populists like trump to “take back control,” reestablish borders and draw hard lines between insiders and outsiders aren’t novel; they’re doing what nationalists do. liberals (like me) lament the populist nationalist phenomenon, but we should hope   now that trump has won   that populist nationalism brings some benefits, especially for those americans who have borne the brunt of globalization’s downside. my deeper worry is for world order: liberal policies and commitments sustained a tolerable peace and bolstered global prosperity over the past half century. if history is any guide, the rise of populist nationalism risks escalating international strife.   daniel j. sargent, historian and co director of the institute of international studies it will take some time before we know exactly whether this election is similar to other countries’ experiences. populism, frustration with inflation, ethnonationalism, and politician led manipulation of voter fears about their fellow citizens are common to many elections around the world in recent years. is this why trump won? they are all potentially contributing factors, but i would hesitate before concluding that impatience with democracy itself is a global trend. rather, i see the global trend as one in which some of the institutional support structures for democratic processes   a strong and independent media at local and national levels, strong political parties, the massive increases in disinformation without any effective counter to it   weaken and make it easier for both populist and nativist politicians to thrive.   susan d. hyde, political scientist and co director of the institute of international studies this presidential campaign illuminated the tensions between the ideals of american democracy and the human motives that can get in its way. former president trump and current vice president harris provided clear contrasts in experience, capacity, enthusiasm, optimism and compassion. while harris provided policy details and offered bipartisan appeals, trump cast a dark picture of criminal immigration, demonization and a country in decline. to the amazement of many, this appeal worked. one can only conclude that, for a majority of americans, democracy is less about people and more about power   and who ought to hold it. a few points from exit polling stand out. while harris won the women’s vote overall, white women, especially those who are suburban, married or who have no college degree, favored trump. and while she won voters of color overall, native americans and latino men favored trump. the implication is that a majority of americans may still have concerns about a president being a woman, person of color, or both. it’s important to keep in mind that the presidential election was but one contest on a ballot of many decisions for voters. while former president trump won a majority and the electoral college, democrats won statewide offices in the challenging states of arizona, north carolina, wisconsin and michigan. arizona’s constitutional right to abortion amendment passed overwhelmingly, as did alaska’s minimum wage increase and sick leave requirement. the 2024 elections also yielded new african american female senators from delaware and maryland, and the first transgender representative and lgbtq+ representative from the south. the point is that the election revealed the dynamism and range of american democracy, but also the continuing racial and gender criteria that inform how people decide their leadership.   david c. wilson, dean of the goldman school of public policy kara manke and anne brice contributed to this report. copyright © 2025 uc regents; all rights reserved copyright © 2025 uc regents; all rights reserved

share since trump took office in january 2017, his administration worked aggressively to turn back the clock on our nation’s civil and human rights progress. here’s how. on january 27, trump signed an executive order   the first version of his muslim ban   that discriminated against muslims and banned refugees. on january 31, under new chairman ajit pai’s leadership, the federal communications commission refused to defend critical components of its prison phone rate rules in federal court   rules that were ultimately struck down in june. on february 3, trump signed an executive order outlining principles for regulating the u.s. financial system and calling for a 120 day review of existing laws, like the dodd frank wall street reform and consumer protection act. the order was viewed as trump’s opening attack on consumer protection laws. on february 3, the fcc rescinded its 2014 joint sales agreement (jsa) guidance, which had led to the only increase in television diversity in recent years. on february 3, fcc chairman pai revoked the lifeline broadband provider (lbp) designations for nine broadband service providers, reducing the number of providers offering broadband and thus decreasing the competitive forces available to drive down prices. on february 7, the white house issued a statement of administration policy supporting h.j. res. 57, a resolution under the congressional review act to overturn a department of education accountability rule that clarifies states’ obligations under the every student succeeds act. the leadership conference on civil and human rights opposes this resolution. on february 9, trump signed three executive orders “to fight crime, gangs, and drugs; restore law and order; and support the dedicated men and women of law enforcement.” the orders, though vague, were viewed suspiciously by civil rights organizations. on february 10, sens. patty murray and maria cantwell of washington wrote to education secretary betsy devos after the centralized resource website for the individuals with disabilities education act (idea) became inaccessible to the public for more than a week. on february 17, devos issued a statement blaming the previous administration for neglecting the site. on february 21, the department of homeland security issued a memo updating immigration enforcement guidance, massively expanding the number of people subject to detention and deportation. the guidance drastically increased the use of expedited removal and essentially eliminated the priorities for deportation. on february 22, the justice department’s civil rights division and the department of education’s office for civil rights jointly rescinded title ix guidance clarifying protections under the law for transgender students. on february 23, attorney general sessions withdrew an earlier justice department memo that set a goal of reducing and ultimately ending the department’s use of private prisons. on february 27, the department of justice dropped the federal government’s longstanding position that a texas voter id law under legal challenge was intentionally racially discriminatory, despite having successfully advanced that argument in multiple federal courts. the district court subsequently rejected the position of the sessions justice department and concluded the law was passed with discriminatory intent. on march 6, the department of justice withdrew its motion for a preliminary injunction against north carolina’s anti transgender hb 2 law. on march 6, trump signed a revised executive order restricting travel to the united states by citizens of iran, libya, somalia, sudan, syria, and yemen and drastically cutting back refugee admissions. on march 6, a week after trump called on lawmakers to repeal the affordable care act during his address to congress, house republicans released a proposal to replace the aca with a law that would end the medicaid program as we know it and defund planned parenthood. on march 6, the department of health and human services proposed ending the collection of data on lgbtq individuals with disabilities, removing questions on lgbtq demographics from the centers for independent living annual program performance report survey. on march 10, the department of housing and urban development withdrew a survey proposed in the federal register meant to assess the efficacy and replicability of hud funded programs to address lgbtq youth homelessness. according to its own data, 40 percent of young people experiencing homelessness identify as lgbtq, so ensuring that its programs are adequately meeting the needs of young lgbtq people is critical to hud meeting its own mission. after significant public outcry, the assessment survey was eventually reinstated. on march 13, the department of health and human services released a draft of the annual national survey of older americans act participants, which gathers data on people who receive services funded through the older americans act. hhs’s draft collection instrument omitted the questions on sexual orientation and gender identity asked on the previous year’s survey. after receiving nearly 14,000 comments on the data collection proposal and after facing bipartisan opposition from congress, hhs restored the question on sexual orientation but omitted a question that yielded information on gender identity. on march 16, the trump administration released a budget blueprint that proposed a $54 billion increase in military spending that would come from $54 billion in direct cuts to non defense programs. the blueprint also proposed spending $4.1 billion through 2018 on the beginnings of construction of a wall through communities on the u.s. mexico border. on march 17, the department of housing and urban development removed links to four key resource documents from its website, which informed emergency shelters on best practices for serving transgender people facing homelessness and complying with hud regulations. on march 22, the white house issued a statement of administration policy supporting h.r. 1628, the american health care act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights opposes. the white house issued a statement supporting the senate’s motion to proceed to this legislation on july 24. on march 27, trump signed a resolution of disapproval under the congressional review act, which repealed a department of education accountability rule finalized last year that would clarify states’ obligations under the every student succeeds act. on march 27, trump signed a resolution of disapproval under the congressional review act, which repealed the fair pay and safe workplaces executive order. the order, signed by president obama, represented a much needed step forward in ensuring that the federal contractor community is providing safe and fair workplaces for employees by encouraging compliance with federal labor and civil rights laws, and prohibiting the use of mandatory arbitration of certain disputes. on march 29, the u.s. census bureau asserted that there was “no federal data need” to justify the collection of sexual orientation and gender identity data in the american community survey (acs). the bureau’s original submission to congress included a table suggesting that it planned to collect data on sexual orientation and gender identity in the acs starting in the next iteration of the survey   but by the end of the day, the bureau hastily removed any reference to these topics in a revised submission. during the obama administration, at least four federal agencies asked the bureau to add these questions. on march 29, the washington post reported that the department of education decided to terminate the opening doors, expanding opportunity grant program, which helps local districts devise ways to boost socioeconomic diversity within their schools. in a march 31 memo, sessions ordered a sweeping review of consent decrees with law enforcement agencies relating to police conduct   a crucial tool in the justice department’s efforts to ensure constitutional and accountable policing. the department also tried, unsuccessfully, to block a federal court in baltimore from approving a consent decree between the city and the baltimore police department to rein in discriminatory police practices that the department itself had negotiated over a multi year period. on april 3, attorney general jeff sessions tried to back out of a consent decree to address civil rights violations by the baltimore police department. on april 11, the administration proposed removing a question from the national survey of children’s health (nsch) regarding preschool suspension and expulsion. without access to valid and reliable data, parents, advocates, educators, service providers, researchers, policymakers, and the public will not have the information they need to ensure early childhood settings are developmentally appropriate and nondiscriminatory. on april 13, trump signed a resolution of disapproval under the congressional review act, which overturned the u.s. department of health and human services’ final rule updating the regulations governing the title x family planning program   a vital source of family planning and related preventive care for low income, uninsured, and young people across the country. on april 14, the department of justice voluntarily dismissed its lawsuit challenging north carolina’s anti transgender hb 2 after the law was modified   although private challenges continued. on april 26, trump released an outline of a tax reform plan that was viewed largely as a tax giveaway for the wealthy and big corporations. on april 26, trump signed an executive order directing secretary of education betsy devos to conduct a study on the federal government’s role in education. on may 2, the white house issued a statement of administration policy supporting h.r. 1180, the working families flexibility act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights opposes. on may 4, trump signed an executive order that he claimed overturned the johnson amendment (though it did not), which precludes tax exempt organizations, including places of worship, from engaging in any political campaign activity and would curtail the contraception mandate of the affordable care act. on may 10, sessions announced in a two page memo that doj was abandoning its smart on crime initiative that had been hailed as a positive step forward in rehabilitating drug users and reducing the enormous costs of warehousing inmates. on may 11, trump signed an executive order creating the so called presidential advisory commission on election integrity headed by vice president mike pence and kansas secretary of state kris kobach, who has a history of trying to suppress the vote in kansas. on may 23, trump released his fiscal year 2018 budget that included massive, unnecessary tax cuts for the wealthy and large corporations, which would be paid for by slashing basic living standards for the most vulnerable and by attacking critical programs like social security disability insurance, medicaid, food assistance, and more. on may 23, trump’s fiscal year 2018 budget proposed eliminating the office of federal contract compliance programs (ofccp) and transferring its functions to the equal employment opportunity commission (eeoc). this would have impeded the work of both the ofccp and the eeoc as each have distinct missions and expertise, and would have thereby undermined the civil rights protections that employers and workers have relied on for almost 50 years. on june 5, trump released an infrastructure plan that focuses on putting public assets into private hands, creating another giveaway to wealthy corporations and millionaires at the expense of working families and communities. on june 6, the department of education’s office for civil rights (ocr) issued unclear new instructions on transgender student discrimination. on june 8, ocr’s acting head sent a memo to ocr staff discouraging systemic investigations in favor of individual investigations of discrimination. on june 14, devos decided to delay implementation of and to renegotiate the borrower defense to repayment and gainful employment regulations   important regulations that had been designed to protect students from predatory conduct by for profit schools. on june 14, the department of education withdrew, without explanation, a 2016 finding that an ohio school district discriminated against a transgender girl. on june 15, the administration rescinded president obama’s deferred action for parents of americans and lawful permanent residents (dapa) program, an initiative that   had it gone into effect   would have offered a pathway to citizenship for immigrant parents with children who are citizens or residents of the united states. on june 27, labor secretary acosta requested information on the obama era overtime rule, signaling his intent to lower the salary threshold of the overtime rule. on june 27, the white house issued a statement of administration policy supporting h.r. 3003, the no sanctuary for criminals act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights opposes. on june 27, the white house issued a statement of administration policy supporting h.r. 3004, kate’s law, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights opposes. on june 28, the justice department’s civil rights division sent a letter to 44 states demanding extensive information on how they maintain their voter rolls. this request was made on the same day that president trump’s so called commission on election integrity sent letters to all 50 states demanding intrusive and highly sensitive personal data about all registered voters. on july 24, the white house issued a statement of administration policy supporting h.j. res 111, a resolution under the congressional review act to overturn the consumer financial protection bureau’s final rule on forced arbitration clauses. the leadership conference on civil and human rights opposes the resolution. the white house issued a statement on october 24 opposing the senate companion resolution. on july 26, trump declared in a series of tweets that he was barring transgender people from serving in the military. he followed through with a presidential memo on august 25, though the issue is still being challenged in the courts. on july 26, the department of justice filed a legal brief arguing that title vii of the civil rights act of 1964 does not prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation   a decision that contravened recent court decisions and equal employment opportunity commission guidance. on august 1, the new york times reported that the “trump administration is preparing to redirect resources of the justice department’s civil rights division toward investigating and suing universities over affirmative action admissions policies deemed to discriminate against white applicants.” in a move without recent precedent, this investigation and enforcement effort was planned to be run out of the civil rights division’s front office by political appointees, instead of by experienced career staff in the division’s educational opportunities section. on august 2, trump announced his support of republican backed legislation that would slash legal immigration in half over a decade. on august 7, the justice department filed a brief in the supreme court in husted v. a. philip randolph institute arguing that it should be easier for states to purge registered voters from their rolls   reversing not only its longstanding legal interpretation, but also the position it had taken in the lower courts in that case. on august 28, sessions lifted the obama administration’s ban on the transfer of some military surplus items to domestic law enforcement   rescinding guidelines that were created in the wake of ferguson to protect the public from law enforcement misuse of military grade weapons. on september 5, sessions announced that the administration was rescinding the deferred action for childhood arrivals (daca) program. on september 7, the department of justice filed a brief with the supreme court in masterpiece cakeshop v. colorado civil rights commission arguing that businesses have a right to discriminate against lgbtq customers. on september 12, the white house issued a statement of administration policy supporting h.r. 3697, the criminal alien gang member removal act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights opposes. on september 15, the department of justice ended the community oriented policing services’ collaborative reform initiative, a justice department program that aimed to help build trust between police officers and the communities they serve. on september 22, devos announced that the department of education was rescinding guidance related to title ix and schools’ obligations regarding sexual violence and educational opportunity. on september 24, trump issued the third version of his muslim ban which, unlike the previous versions, was of indefinite duration. on september 27, the trump administration and republican leadership in congress unveiled tax principles that would provide trillions in dollars of unnecessary tax cuts to millionaires, billionaires, and wealthy corporations. on october 2, devos rescinded 72 guidance documents outlining the rights of students with disabilities, though it wasn’t until october 21 until the public learned of the rescissions. on october 4, the department of justice filed a brief in the u.s. district court for the district of columbia asking the court to dismiss a lawsuit against the president’s transgender military ban. on october 5, sessions reversed a justice department policy which clarified that transgender workers are protected from discrimination under title vii of the civil rights act of 1964. on october 6, the department of justice issued sweeping religious liberty guidance to federal agencies, which will create a license to discriminate against lgbtq individuals and others. on october 8, the white house released a list of hard line immigration principles   a list of demands that included funding a border wall, deporting central american children seeking sanctuary, and curbing grants to sanctuary cities, effectively stalling any possible bipartisan agreement on a bill to protect dreamers. on october 12, trump signed an executive order to undermine health care and, later that day, announced that he would end subsidies for certain health care plans. on october 27, the department of education announced it was withdrawing nearly 600 policy documents regarding k 12 and higher education. on november 1, trump signed a resolution of disapproval under the congressional review act, which repealed the consumer financial protection bureau’s rule on forced arbitration. overturning the rule will enable big banks, payday lenders, and other financial companies to force victims of fraud, discrimination, or other unlawful conduct into a “kangaroo court” process where their claims are decided by hired arbitration firms rather than by judges and juries   harming consumers and undermining civil rights and consumer protection laws. on november 6, the trump administration announced it will terminate the temporary protected status (tps) designation for nicaragua. on november 14, the white house issued a statement of administration policy supporting h.r. 1, the tax cuts and jobs act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights opposes. the white house subsequently issued statements supporting this legislation on november 30 (the senate version) and on december 18 (the conference report). on november 16, the federal communications commission voted to gut lifeline, the program dedicated to bringing phone and internet service within reach for people of color, low income people, seniors, veterans, and people with disabilities, with particularly egregious consequences for tribal areas. they also voted to eliminate several rules promoting competition and diversity in the broadcast media, undermining ownership chances for women and people of color. on november 20, the trump administration announced it would terminate the temporary protected status (tps) designation in 18 months for approximately 59,000 haitians living in the united states. on november 24, trump appointed mick mulvaney as acting director of the consumer financial protection bureau (cfpb). as a member of congress, mulvaney supported abolishing the consumer bureau and has in the past referred to the cfpb as a “sick, sad” joke. on december 4, the department of labor proposed changing its longstanding position codified in regulation that prohibited employers from pooling together tips and redistributing them to workers who don’t traditionally earn tips. on december 12, the department of justice wrote to acting census bureau director ron jarmin requesting a question about citizenship on the 2020 census. it was an untimely and unnecessarily intrusive request that would destroy any chance for an accurate count, discard years of careful research, and increase costs significantly. on december 21, it was reported that sessions rescinded 25 guidance documents, including a letter sent to chief judges and court administrators to help state and local efforts to reform harmful practices of imposing fees and fines on poor people. on january 4, sessions rescinded guidance that had allowed states, with minimal federal interference, to legalize marijuana. this move will further reignite the war on drugs. on january 8, trump re nominated a slate of unqualified and biased judicial nominees, including two rated not qualified by the american bar association. on january 8, the administration announced it would terminate the temporary protected status (tps) designation for nearly 200,000 salvadorans. on january 11, the trump administration released new guidelines that allow states to seek waivers to require medicaid recipients to work   requirements that represent a throwback to rejected racial stereotypes. on january 12, the trump administration approved a waiver allowing kentucky to require medicaid recipients to work. on january 16, the consumer financial protection bureau under mulvaney’s leadership announced it would reconsider the agency’s payday lending rule. on january 17, the administration announced its decision to bar citizens from haiti from receiving h2 a and h2 b visas. on january 18, the department of health and human services announced a proposed rule to allow health care providers to discriminate against patients, and within the department’s office for civil rights, a new division   the conscience and religious freedom division   to address related claims. on january 18, the cfpb abruptly dropped a lawsuit against four online payday lenders who unlawfully made loans of up to 950 percent apr in at least 17 states. on january 25, the census bureau announced that the questionnaire for the 2018 end to end census test will use race and ethnicity questions from the 2010 census instead of updated questions recommended by census bureau staff. this suggests that the office of management and budget will not revise the official standards for collecting and reporting this data, despite recommendations from a federal agency working group to do so. on february 1, the new york times reported that the department of justice was effectively closing its office for access to justice, which was designed to make access to legal aid more accessible. on february 1, reports surfaced claiming trump’s labor department concealed an economic analysis that found working people could lose billions of dollars in wages under its proposal to roll back an obama era rule   a rule that protects working people in tipped industries from having their tips taken away by their employers. on february 1, multiple sources reported that acting consumer financial protection bureau director mick mulvaney had transferred the consumer agency’s office of fair lending and equal opportunity from the supervision, enforcement, and fair lending division to the director’s office. the move essentially gutted the unit responsible for enforcing anti lending discrimination laws. on february 2, the trump administration approved a waiver allowing indiana to require some medicaid recipients to work. on february 12, the trump administration released its fiscal year 2019 budget proposal, which would deny critical health care to those most in need simply to bankroll the president’s wall through border communities. the proposal would also eliminate the community relations service   a justice department office established by the civil rights act of 1964   which has been a key tool that helps address discrimination, conflicts, and tensions in communities around the country. on february 12, the trump administration released an infrastructure proposal that would reward the rich and special interests at the expense of low income communities and communities of color and leave behind too many american communities and those most in need. on february 12, buzzfeed news reported that the u.s. department of education would no longer investigate complaints filed by transgender students who have been banned from using the restrooms that correspond with their gender identity. on the same day, the department released a statement saying trump’s budget “protects vulnerable students”   a dubious claim. on february 26, the u.s. department of education proposed to delay implementation of a rule that enforces the individuals with disabilities education act (idea). the rule implements the idea’s provisions regarding significant disproportionality in the identification, placement, and discipline of students with disabilities with regard to race and ethnicity. on march 5, the trump administration approved arkansas’ request to require some medicaid recipients to work. on march 5, the office for civil rights at the u.s. department of education released a new case processing manual (cpm) that creates greater hurdles for people filing complaints and allows dismissal of civil rights complaints based on the number of times an individual has filed. on march 5, a department of housing and urban development memo announced secretary ben carson’s consideration of revising the agency’s mission statement and removing anti discrimination language and promises of inclusive communities. on march 12, attorney general sessions announced the justice department’s ‘school safety’ plan   a plan that civil rights advocates criticized as militarizing schools, overpolicing children, and harming students, disproportionately students of color. on march 14, the white house issued a statement of administration policy supporting h.r. 4909, the student, teachers, and officers preventing (stop) school violence act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights opposes. on march 23, trump issued new orders to ban most transgender people from serving in the military   the latest iteration of a ban that he had initially announced in a series of tweets in july 2017. on march 23, trump signed a spending bill that included the stop school violence act, which civil rights organizations are concerned will exacerbate the school to prison pipeline crisis, further criminalize historically marginalized children, and increase the militarization of, and over policing in, schools and communities of color. on march 26, secretary of commerce wilbur ross announced that he had directed the census bureau to add an untested and unnecessary question to the 2020 census form, which would ask the citizenship status of every person in america. on april 3, secretary of education betsy devos restored recognition of for profit school accreditor acics, which the prior administration had terminated as a federal aid gatekeeper based on acics’s documented failures to set, monitor, or enforce standards at the schools it accredited, including the now defunct corinthian, itt, and fasttrain. on april 6, attorney general sessions announced that he had notified all u.s. attorney’s offices along the southwest border of a new “zero tolerance” policy toward people trying to enter the country   a policy that quickly, and inhumanely, separated hundreds of children from their families. on april 10, a federal official announced that the department of justice was halting the legal orientation program, which offers legal assistance to immigrants. on april 10, trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies to push for work requirements for low income people in america who receive federal assistance, including medicaid and snap. on april 11, the bureau of justice statistics announced that it will stop asking 16  and 17 year olds to disclose voluntarily and confidentially their gender identity and sexual orientation on the national crime victimization survey. on april 17, the white house issued a statement of administration policy supporting s.j. res. 57, a resolution under the congressional review act to repeal the consumer financial protection bureau’s guidance on indirect auto financing. the sole purpose of the resolution is to undermine the ability of the cfpb to enforce laws against racial and ethnic discrimination in auto lending, which is why the leadership conference on civil and human rights opposes it. on april 25, secretary ben carson proposed changes to federal housing subsidies that could triple rent for some households and make it easier to impose work requirements. on april 26, the trump administration announced it would terminate the temporary protected status (tps) designation in 12 months for approximately 9,000 nepalese immigrants. on may 3, trump signed an executive order creating a white house faith and opportunity initiative tasked with working on “religious liberty” issues across federal agencies. the order deleted protections for beneficiaries receiving federally funded services from religious groups. on may 4, the trump administration announced it would terminate the temporary protected status (tps) designation in 18 months for approximately 57,000 honduran immigrants. on may 7, the trump administration approved new hampshire’s request to require some medicaid recipients to work or participate in other “community engagement activities.” on may 11, the federal bureau of prisons released changes to its transgender offender manual that rolled back protections allowing transgender inmates to use facilities, including bathrooms and cell blocks, that correspond to their gender identity. on may 13, the new york times reported that the department of education had “effectively killed investigations into possibly fraudulent activities at several large for profit colleges where top hires of betsy devos, the education secretary, had previously worked” by reassigning, marginalizing, or instructing its fraud investigators to focus on other matters. on may 18, the department of housing and urban development announced it would be publishing three separate notices to indefinitely suspend implementation of the 2015 affirmatively furthering fair housing rule. on may 21, trump signed a resolution of disapproval under the congressional review act, which repealed the consumer financial protection bureau’s (cfpb) guidance on indirect auto financing. on may 21, the white house issued a statement of administration policy supporting s. 2155, the economic growth, regulatory relief, and consumer protection act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights opposes. on may 22, the trump administration issued a draft notice of proposed rulemaking (nprm) designed to block access to health care under title x and deny women information about their reproductive health care options. on may 24, trump signed the economic growth, regulatory relief and consumer protection act, which will undermine one of our nation’s key civil rights laws and weaken consumer protections enacted after the 2008 financial crisis. the law rolls back more expansive home mortgage disclosure act data requirements for banks that generate fewer than 500 loans or lines of credit each year, thereby exempting 85 percent of banks and credit unions. on may 24, the department of education announced that it does not plan to implement rules designed to protect students in online degree programs from being taken advantage of by schools that load students up with debt but offer useless degrees, and instead plans to delay implementation of the rules and rewrite them. on june 6, mick mulvaney fired all 25 members of the consumer financial protection bureau’s consumer advisory board. on june 8, a department of justice filing argued that the affordable care act’s protections for people with pre existing conditions are unconstitutional. the brief was signed by chad readler, a justice department official who trump nominated (and senate republicans confirmed) to serve on the u.s. court of appeals for the sixth circuit. on june 11, attorney general sessions ruled that fear of domestic or gang violence was not grounds for asylum in the united states. on june 11, u.s. citizenship and immigration services (uscis) director l. francis cissna announced the creation of a denaturalization task force in a push to strip naturalized citizens of their citizenship. on june 11, the department of justice announced that it would delay implementation of a permanent program for collecting information on arrest related deaths until fiscal year 2020, a full five years after the death in custody reporting act was signed into law and two years after doj last published its near final compliance guidelines. on june 12, the department of justice sued the state of kentucky to force it to “systematically remove the names of ineligible voters from the registration records.” this voter purge lawsuit was filed one day after the u.s. supreme court upheld ohio’s voter purges in husted v. a. philip randolph institute. on june 18, nikki haley, the u.s. ambassador to the united nations, announced that the united states was withdrawing from the un human rights council. on june 27, the white house issued a statement of administration policy supporting h.r. 6139, the border security and immigration reform act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights opposes. on july 3, attorney general jeff sessions and education secretary betsy devos rescinded guidance from the departments of justice and education that provides a roadmap to implement voluntary diversity and integration programs in higher education consistent with supreme court holdings on the issue. on july 10, the centers for medicare and medicaid services announced cuts to navigator funding for outreach to hard to reach communities for the fall 2018 affordable care act open enrollment period. on july 25, the department of education proposed new borrower defense rules, which would further exacerbate inequalities   making the already unfair and ineffective student loan servicing system even more harmful to all students, particularly to borrowers of color. the proposal would strip away student borrower rights, end key deterrents of predatory school conduct, and make it nearly impossible for students hurt by school misconduct to get loan relief. on july 26, the trump administration failed to meet a court ordered deadline to reunite children and families separated at the border. on july 30, jeff sessions announced the creation of a religious liberty task force at the department of justice, which many saw as a taxpayer funded effort to license discrimination against lgbtq people and others. on august 10, the department of labor encouraged the office of federal contract compliance programs (ofccp) staff to grant broad religious exemptions to federal contractors with religious based objections to complying with executive order 11246, and deleted material from a prior ofccp faq on sexual orientation and gender identity nondiscrimination protections that previously clarified the limited scope of allowable religious exemptions. on august 13, secretary ben carson proposed changes to the obama era affirmatively furthering fair housing (affh) rule, which aimed to combat segregation in housing policy. on august 15, the federal register published a trump administration proposal to restrict protest rights in washington, d.c. by closing 80 percent of the white house sidewalk, putting new limits on spontaneous demonstrations, and opening the door to charging fees for protesting. on august 29, the new york times reported that the department of education is preparing rules that would “narrow the definition of sexual harassment, holding schools accountable only for formal complaints filed through proper authorities and for conduct said to have occurred on their campuses. they would also establish a higher legal standard to determine whether schools improperly addressed complaints.” on august 30, the department of justice filed an amicus brief opposing harvard college’s motion for summary judgement in students for fair admissions, inc. v. harvard, choosing to oppose constitutionally sound strategies that colleges and universities use to expand educational opportunity for students of all backgrounds. on september 5, the trump administration sent sweeping subpoenas to the north carolina state elections board and 44 county elections boards requesting voter records be turned over by september 25. two months before the midterm elections, civil rights advocates worried this effort would lead to voter suppression and intimidation. on september 6, the department of homeland security and the department of health and human services announced a proposal to withdraw from the flores settlement agreement. the flores agreement is a set of protections for underage migrant children in government custody. on september 13, the national labor relations board proposed weakening the “joint employer standard” under the national labor relations act, which would make it difficult for working people to bring the companies that share control over their terms and conditions of employment to the bargaining table. on october 1, a policy change at the department of state took effect saying that the trump administration would no longer issue family visas to same sex domestic partners of foreign diplomats or employees of international organizations who work in the united states. on october 10, the department of homeland security’s proposed ‘public charge’ rule was published in the federal register. under the rule, immigrants who apply for a green card or visa could be deemed a ‘public charge’ and turned away if they earn below 250 percent of the federal poverty line and use any of a wide range of public programs. on october 12, the department of justice filed a statement of interest opposing a consent decree negotiated by chicago mayor rahm emanuel and illinois attorney general lisa madigan to overhaul the chicago police department. on october 15, trump vetoed a resolution, passed by both chambers of congress, that would have terminated his declaration of a national emergency on the southern border with mexico. on october 16, the administration released its fall 2017 unified agenda of federal regulatory and deregulatory actions. the document details the regulatory and deregulatory actions that federal agencies plan to make in the coming months, including harmful civil and human rights rollbacks. on october 19, the department of justice ended its agreement to monitor the juvenile court of memphis and shelby county and the shelby county detention center in tennessee, which addressed discrimination against black youth, unsafe conditions, and no due process at hearings. on october 21, the new york times reported that the department of health and human services is considering an interpretation of title ix that “would define sex as either male or female, unchangeable, and determined by the genitals that a person is born with”   effectively erasing protections for transgender people. on october 22, the centers for medicare and medicaid services (cms) issued new guidance on the affordable care act’s 1332 waivers that would expand a state’s flexibility to establish insurance markets that don’t meet the requirements of the aca. on october 24, the department of justice filed a brief with the u.s. supreme court arguing that federal civil rights law does not protect transgender workers from discrimination on the basis of their gender identity. on october 30, axios reported that trump intends to sign an executive order to end birthright citizenship. in a tweet the following day, trump said “it will be ended one way or the other.” on october 31, the administration approved a waiver allowing wisconsin to require medicaid recipients to work. it was the first time a state that did not expand medicaid under the affordable care act was allowed to impose work requirements. on november 5, the department of justice filed a petition with the u.s. supreme court to circumvent three separate u.s. courts of appeals on litigation concerning the deferred action for childhood arrivals (daca) program. on november 7, on his last day as attorney general, jeff sessions issued a memorandum to gut the department of justice’s use of consent decrees. on november 8, the department of homeland security and department of justice announced an interim final rule to block people from claiming asylum if they enter the united states outside legal ports of entry. on november 8, the department of labor rolled back guidance issued by the obama administration that clarified that tipped workers must spend at least 80 percent of their time doing tipped work in order for employers to pay them the lower tipped minimum wage. on november 16, the department of education issued a draft title ix regulation that represents a cruel attempt to silence sexual assault survivors and limit their educational opportunity   and could lead schools to do even less to prevent and respond to sexual violence and harassment. on november 23, the office of personnel management rescinded guidance that helped federal agency managers understand how to support transgender federal workers and respect their rights (initially issued in 2011 and updates several times since), replacing it with vaguely worded guidance hostile to transgender working people. on december 11, trump declared that he would be “proud to shut down the government”   which he did. it resulted in the longest government shutdown in u.s. history (35 days), which harmed federal workers, contractors, their families, and the communities that depend on them. on december 14, buzzfeed news reported that the department of housing and urban development was quietly advising lenders to deny daca recipients federal housing administration (fha) loans. on december 18, the trump administration’s school safety commission recommended rescinding obama era school discipline guidance, which was intended to assist states, districts, and schools in developing practices and policies to enhance school climate and comply with federal civil rights laws. on december 21, following the recommendation of trump’s school safety commission, the departments of justice and education rescinded the dear colleague letter on the nondiscriminatory administration of school discipline. both departments jointly issued the guidance in january 2014. on january 3, the washington post reported that the trump administration is considering rolling back disparate impact regulations that provide anti discrimination protections to people of color, women, and others. on january 4, the guardian reported that the trump administration has stopped cooperating with and responding to un investigators over potential human rights violations in the united states. on january 23, the department of health and human services granted a waiver to south carolina to allow state licensed child welfare agencies to discriminate in accordance with religious beliefs. on january 25, the department of homeland security began implementing the migrant protection protocols   also known as the remain in mexico policy   which forces central americans seeking asylum to return to mexico, for an indefinite amount of time, while their claims are processed. on january 29, the department of justice reversed its position in a texas voting rights case, saying the state should not need to have its voting changes pre cleared with the federal government. career voting rights lawyers at the department declined to sign the brief. on february 6, the consumer financial protection bureau (cfpb)   under the direction of trump appointed director kathy kraninger   released its plan to roll back the central protections of the agency’s 2017 payday and car title lending rule. on february 15, trump announced that he would declare a national emergency on the southern border   an attempt to end run the congress in order to build a harmful and wasteful border wall. on february 22, the department of health and human services (hhs) issued a final rule to significantly undermine the title x family planning program’s ability to properly serve its patients and to provide its hallmark quality care. the rule’s provisions will have far reaching implications for all title x funded programs, the services provided, and the ability of patients to seek and receive high quality, confidential family planning and preventive health care services. on february 25, the white house issued a statement of administration policy opposing h.r. 8, the bipartisan background checks act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights supports. on february 26, the white house issued a statement of administration policy opposing h.j. res. 46, a resolution terminating the national emergency on the southern border declared by president trump, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights supports. on september 25, the white house issued a statement opposing the senate’s companion resolution. on march 5, the white house issued a statement of administration policy opposing h.r. 1, the for the people act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights supports. on march 7, the department of labor issued a proposed revision to the overtime rule, which proposes to raise the salary threshold to an amount ($35,308) far lower than the obama labor department’s previously finalized rule ($47,476). on march 11, the trump administration released its fy 2020 budget proposal, which requested $8.6 billion for a southern border wall, requested an inexplicably and irresponsibly low figure for 2020 census operations, and proposed deeply troubling cuts to the social safety net   including cuts to medicaid, medicare, social security, and snap. on march 12, the department of defense issued guidance for enacting the transgender military ban to begin in 30 days. on march 25, the trump administration said in an appeals court filing that the entire affordable care act should be struck down. on april 11, the trump administration ordered all federal agencies to put important policy decisions on hold until they have been reviewed by the white house, making it take even longer for independent regulators to respond to problems like risky lending practices. on april 12, politico reported that the trump administration will not nominate (or renominate) anyone to the 18 member u.n. committee on the elimination of racial discrimination. on april 17, the department of housing and urban development proposed a rule (eventually published on may 10) seeking to restrict housing assistance for families with mixed citizenship status. the agency’s own analysis showed that the proposal could lead to 55,000 children becoming temporarily homeless. on april 19, the department of health and human services published a proposal to reverse an obama era rule that required the data collection of the sexual orientation and gender identity of youth in foster care, along with their foster parents, adoptive parents, or legal guardians. on may 2, the department of health and human services announced a final rule to allow health workers to cite religious or moral objections to deny care to patients, which will substantially harm the health and well being of many people in america   particularly women and transgender patients. on may 6, the centers for medicare and medicaid services (cms) published a final rule targeting home care workers   who are mostly women of color   designed to stop them from paying union dues and benefits through payroll deduction. on may 6, the office of management and budget proposed regulatory changes that could result in cuts in federal aid to millions of low income americans by changing how inflation is used to calculate the definition of poverty. on may 20, the white house issued a statement of administration policy opposing h.r. 1500, the consumers first act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights supports. on may 22, the department of housing and urban development proposed changing the obama era equal access rule to allow homeless shelters to deny access based on a person’s gender identity. on may 24, the department of health and human services announced a proposed rule to weaken the non discrimination protections (section 1557) of the affordable care act. the rule, if implemented, would harm millions of people in america by allowing health care providers to deny care to marginalized communities and worsen already existing health disparities. on june 3, the white house issued a statement of administration policy opposing h.r. 6, the american dream and promise act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights supports. on june 6, the consumer financial protection bureau issued a final rule that delayed the compliance date for the agency’s 2017 payday and car title lending rule. on june 10, acting secretary of homeland security kevin mcaleenan announced that immigration hardliner ken cuccinelli was the new acting director of u.s. citizenship and immigration services. five months later, the new acting secretary of homeland security, chad wolf, named cuccinelli to be the senior official performing the duties of the deputy secretary of homeland security. a federal judge and the government accountability office, respectively, said that cuccinelli’s appointments were illegal. on june 12, trump asserted executive privilege to block congressional access to documents related to the addition of an untested citizenship question to the 2020 census. on june 21, it was reported that trump had directed u.s. immigration and customs enforcement (ice) agents to conduct a mass roundup of migrant families. the following day, the president announced that the raids were delayed, but has continued to threaten them. on july 1, the department of education rescinded the “gainful employment” rule that identified higher education programs that routinely left students with unaffordable debt. the rule had been designed to ensure that students who needed to borrow loans were able to reap the benefit of their investment in education. on july 3, the department of housing and urban development removed requirements that applicants for homelessness funding maintain anti discrimination policies and demonstrate efforts to serve lgbt people and their families, which had been included in notices of funding availability for several prior years. on july 8, the state department created the commission on unalienable rights aimed at providing review of the role of human rights in american foreign policy. seven of the appointees to commission have disturbing anti lgbt records. on july 15, the administration moved to end asylum protections for most central american migrants   deeming anyone who passes through another country ineligible for asylum at the u.s. southern border. on july 15, the white house issued a statement of administration policy opposing h.r. 582, the raise the wage act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights supports. on july 23, the trump administration published a notice in the federal register that expands expedited removals to a wider range of undocumented immigrants. the move threatens same day deportation for anyone who cannot immediately show they have been in the united states continuously for two years without a hearing, oversight, review, or appeal. it also threatens to trigger massive racial profiling and roundups for immigrants and citizens in the united states. on july 23, the trump administration proposed a rule that could cut more than 3 million people from the supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap)   or food stamps   after congress blocked similar efforts in 2018. on july 25, attorney general william barr announced that the federal government will reverse a nearly two decade moratorium to resume the federal death penalty. on july 31, bloomberg law reported that the department of housing and urban development plans to issue a proposed rule to amend the agency’s “disparate impact” regulations that provide anti discrimination protections to people of color, women, and others. if enacted, millions of people in america would be more vulnerable to housing discrimination   with fewer tools to challenge it. the proposal was officially published in the federal register on august 19. on august 7, immigration and customs enforcement (ice) raided seven food processing plants in mississippi and arrested 680 undocumented immigrants   representing the largest workplace raid in more than a decade. the raids   part of this administration’s dangerous, anti immigrant agenda   left some children parentless and locked out of their homes after school. on august 12, the administration announced its final “public charge” rule, which makes it more difficult for immigrants who come to the united states legally to stay as permanent residents if they have used (or are viewed as likely to use) public benefits. on august 13, bloomberg law reported that the department of justice is urging the equal employment opportunity commission to change its position and urge the u.s. supreme court to rule that businesses can discriminate against lgbtq workers. on august 15, the department of labor’s office of federal contract compliance programs (ofccp) unveiled a proposal that would allow government contractors to fire lgbtq employees, or workers who are pregnant and unmarried, based on the employers’ religious views. on august 16, the department of justice filed a brief with the u.s. supreme court arguing that title vii of the civil rights act of 1964 does not prohibit discrimination against transgender people. former attorney general jeff sessions previously reversed an obama era doj policy which clarified that transgender workers are protected from discrimination under title vii. on august 16, u.s. citizenship and immigration services sent letters, first reported in the boston area, stating that the agency will no longer consider most deferrals of deportation for people with a serious medical condition   asking people in extreme medical need to leave the country within 33 days. on august 19, the department of justice filed a brief with the u.s. supreme court arguing that the trump administration acted lawfully when it rescinded the deferred action for childhood arrivals (daca) program in september 2017. on august 21, acting homeland security secretary kevin mcaleenan announced that the administration was moving forward with new rules aimed at ending the decades old flores settlement agreement that ensures constitutional protections for children in immigrant detention facilities. without the protections of flores, the government can hold immigrant children indefinitely, and in prison like conditions, with no hope for a timely release and no mandate for appropriate care of traumatized children. on august 23, the department of justice filed a brief with the u.s. supreme court arguing that title vii of the civil rights act of 1964 does not prohibit discrimination against gay, lesbian, and bisexual people. on august 23, the san francisco chronicle reported that attorney general barr promoted six judges to the board of immigration appeals, which sets binding policy for deportation cases. all six of the judges have high rates of denying immigrants’ asylum claims, and four of them fill seats that the trump administration created in 2018. on august 28, the trump administration announced that some children born to u.s. military members and government employees working overseas wouldn’t automatically be considered u.s. citizens. on august 30, secretary of education betsy devos announced final new “borrower defense” regulations that rolled back protections for student borrowers against predatory recruiting and other school misconduct put in place in 2016. on september 3, the trump administration announced that it would divert $3.6 billion of funding for military construction projects to fund the president’s harmful and wasteful wall along the southern border. on september 11, multiple reports confirmed that the trump administration would not grant temporary protected status (tps) to bahamians impacted by hurricane dorian. the denial of protected status follows the trump administration’s termination of the tps designation for several other countries. on september 17, the white house issued a statement of administration policy opposing h.r. 1423, the forced arbitration injustice repeal (fair) act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights supports. on september 19, the department of education proposed removing gender based harassment   including harassment based on gender identity, gender expression, and nonconformity with gender stereotypes   from the civil rights data collection’s definition of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex. on september 23, acting homeland security secretary kevin mcaleenan announced that the administration would soon end a federal immigration policy (commonly referred to as “catch and release”) that allows migrant families seeking asylum in the united states to remain in this country while their asylum applications are pending. on september 24, the department of labor released its final overtime rule, which raises the salary threshold to an amount far lower than the obama labor department’s previously finalized rule. on september 27, the justice department’s civil rights division filed a statement of interest in defense of a roman catholic archbishop’s decision that led to the firing of a gay, married teacher   yet another move by the trump administration to use religion as a shield against core anti discrimination principles that protect lgbtq people. on october 1, the department of agriculture unveiled a new proposal to take away some state flexibility in setting benefit levels under the supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap)   the administration’s third attempt in the past year to kick people off food stamps. on october 4, trump signed a proclamation to deny visas to legal immigrants who are unable to prove they will have health care coverage or the ability to pay for it within 30 days of their arrival to the united states. on october 7, the department of labor released a proposed tip rule that would eliminate the “80/20 rule,” which says that when a tipped worker is assigned non tip generating ‘side work’ that takes up more than 20 percent of their time, the employer can’t take the tip credit and must instead pay the worker the full minimum wage. on october 22, a department of justice proposal published in the federal register proposed to begin collecting dna samples from immigrants crossing the border, creating an enormous database of asylum seekers and other migrants. on october 23, the white house issued a statement of administration policy opposing h.r. 4617, the stopping harmful interference in elections for a lasting democracy (shield) act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights supports. on october 25, u.s. citizenship and immigration services announced a new policy to narrow who can qualify for waivers of fees associated with applications for green cards, u.s. citizenship, work permits, and other benefits. on october 25, attorney general william barr issued two decisions, made through his certification power, that will limit immigrants’ options to fight deportation. on november 1, the department of health and human services issued a rule to undo requirements that its grantees ensure that federal taxpayer dollars are not used to fund discrimination. on november 1, the department of education issued a final regulation permitting religious colleges and universities to ignore nondiscrimination standards set by accrediting agencies. on november 18, the social security administration published in the federal register a proposal to slash social security disability benefits   which could cut benefits for up to 2.6 million people with disabilities. on december 3, the white house issued a statement of administration policy opposing h.r. 4, the voting rights advancement act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights supports. on december 10, the equal employment opportunities commission (eeoc) revealed a proposed rule that would prohibit the use of official time by union representatives to assist in federal workplace anti discrimination claims. on december 11, memos obtained by npr revealed that secretary betsy devos overruled career staff in the department of education’s borrower defense unit, who recommended to the department’s political leadership that defrauded student borrowers deserve no less than full relief from their student debts (the secretary instead provided only partial or no relief to most such borrowers). on december 12, the trump administration approved a waiver allowing south carolina to require most medicaid recipients to work. on december 18, attorney general william barr announced the launch of operation relentless pursuit, which was projected to funnel $71 million to law enforcement in seven cities   albuquerque, baltimore, cleveland, detroit, kansas city, memphis, and milwaukee   under the guise of combating violent crime. operation relentless pursuit replicates the most devastating aspects of the violent crime control and law enforcement act of 1994, which flooded america’s streets with cops and dramatically increased incarceration rates, especially in black and brown communities. on december 27, huffpost reported that the department of the interior removed “sexual orientation” from a statement in the agency’s ethics guide regarding workplace discrimination. on december 30, the department of labor announced a proposed rule setting out new standards for when the office of federal contract compliance programs could issue predetermination notices for preliminary findings of discrimination. the rule would make it more difficult to identify and remedy potential discrimination in federal contractor and subcontractor workplaces, negatively impacting the right of federal contract workers to be free from unlawful employment discrimination. on january 3, the trump administration filed a brief in june medical services v. gee, urging the court to allow a louisiana abortion access law to go into effect. the civil rights community filed briefs urging the court to strike down the restrictive law, highlighting the law’s impact on black women. on january 7, the department of housing and urban development issued a proposal that would gut the agency’s 2015 affirmatively furthering fair housing rule. hud’s proposal would leave people of color, women, and other protected communities already harmed by unfair and unequal housing policies at a further disadvantage. on january 13, the washington post reported that the trump administration would divert $7.2 billion of funding from the pentagon to fund the president’s harmful and wasteful wall along the southern border. on january 13 (and subsequently on february 11 for the senate companion resolution), the white house issued a statement of administration policy opposing h.j. res 76, a resolution under the congressional review act to overturn secretary of education betsy devos’s borrower defense rule. the leadership conference on civil and human rights supports this resolution. on january 13, the white house issued a statement of administration policy opposing h.r. 1230, the protecting older workers against discrimination act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights supports. on january 16, nine federal agencies issued proposed rules eliminating the rights of people receiving help from federal programs to (i) request a referral if they have a concern or problem with a faith based provider and (ii) receive written notice of their rights. the changes would encourage agencies to claim broader religious exemptions to deny help to certain people while receiving federal funds. on january 23, the department of state announced a new regulation aimed at denying pregnant people visas to prevent them from traveling to the united states. the regulation represents an attack against pregnant people living in countries without access to the visa waiver program and immigrant women, particularly those of color, and with low incomes. on january 30, the centers for medicare and medicaid services released block grant guidance to allow states to cap medicaid spending   essentially putting forward the notion that we should ration health care for the most vulnerable people in our nation. on january 31, the trump administration announced an expansion of its muslim ban, which will expand restrictions on additional countries including myanmar (also known as burma), eritrea, kyrgyzstan, nigeria, sudan, and tanzania. on february 5, the white house issued a statement of administration policy opposing h.r. 2474, the protecting the right to organize (pro) act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights supports. on february 10, the trump administration released its fiscal year 2021 budget proposal, which included $1 trillion in cuts to medicaid and the aca over 10 years, cuts to snap by $182 billion over 10 years, cuts assistance for some people with disabilities through social security disability insurance and supplemental security income, and reduces the temporary assistance for needy families (tanf) program by $21 billion over 10 years, among other drastic cuts. on february 13, the department of housing and urban development proposed to amend the equal participation of faith based organizations rule that removes safeguards to prevent discrimination. on february 14, the trump administration announced the deployment of law enforcement tactical units from the southern border as part of an arrest operation in sanctuary cities across the country. this includes the deployment of members of the elite tactical unit known as bortac, which acts as a border patrol swat team. on february 20, the white house published a memo (dated january 29) signed by trump that granted secretary of defense mark esper the authority to ignore the collective bargaining rights of civilian employees working for the department of defense. on february 25, the department of justice sided with the plaintiff, students for fair admissions, to oppose race based affirmative action at harvard university in a friend of the court brief filed in the first circuit court of appeals. on february 26, the department of homeland security expanded two pilot programs, the humanitarian asylum review process (harp) for mexican nationals and prompt asylum claim review (pacr), that fast track the asylum process for migrants at the u.s. border. the american civil liberties union argues that both programs deny asylum seekers due process since it is nearly impossible for the migrants to access legal help. on february 26, the department of justice created a denaturalization section in its immigration office to prioritize stripping citizenship rights from naturalized immigrants who commit certain crimes. on february 27, the department of justice filed a statement of interest in support of a kentucky wedding photographer who is challenging a city ordinance banning businesses from discriminating against gay customers. the photographer, chelsey nelson, refused to photograph same sex weddings due to her religious beliefs. on february 28, the department of justice proposed regulations increasing fees for immigrants and requiring asylum seekers to pay a $50 fee to have their cases heard in court. fees for permanent residence permits would increase by $990, to a total of $2,750, and the cost for naturalization of new citizens would increase by $445, to $1,170. on march 6, the department of justice issued a rule saying that dna data samples from migrants taken into federal custody after trying to cross the u.s. border can be stored and shared among federal agencies. on march 10, the white house issued a statement of administration policy opposing h.r. 2486, the national origin based antidiscrimination for nonimmigrants (no ban) act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights supports. on march 17, the department of labor’s office of federal contract compliance programs announced a decision to temporarily exempt and waive certain affirmative action requirements connected to federal contracts for coronavirus relief. on march 20, the centers for disease control and prevention imposed a 30 day restriction on all nonessential travel into the united states from mexico and canada   an effort, led by stephen miller, to use public health laws to reduce immigration. on march 24, attorney general william barr signed a statement of interest arguing against the connecticut interscholastic athletic conference’s transgender athlete policy, which allows athletes to compete as the gender with which they identify. on april 20, the trump administration extended its march 2020 cdc rule on border restrictions until may 20, 2020. on april 22, trump signed an executive order to temporarily ban the issuance of green cards to people seeking permanent residency in the united states   a move that was viewed as a shameless manipulation of the pandemic to justify the administration’s xenophobic policies. on april 30, the department of education issued guidance, flouting congressional intent under the cares act, that directs school districts to share millions of dollars designated for low income students with wealthy private schools. on may 6, the department of education released its final rule on title ix that raises the bar of proof for sexual misconduct, bolsters the rights of those accused, and introduces new protections that include sexual harassment. if the rule takes effect, it will silence sexual assault survivors and limit their educational opportunity. on may 12, the department of agriculture appealed an injunction that blocked the agency from proceeding with cuts to the snap program (food stamps). the new requirements, if the usda wins its appeals, would strip 688,000 americans of their food benefits. on may 12, the department of health and human services eliminated sexual orientation and gender identity and tribal data collection in the adoption and foster care analysis and reporting system (afcars, which collects case level information on all children in foster care and those who have been adopted with title iv e agency involvement). on may 14, the white house issued a statement of administration policy opposing h.r. 6800, the health and economic recovery omnibus emergency solutions (heroes) act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights supports. on may 15, the department of education’s office for civil rights sent a letter of impending enforcement action to the connecticut interscholastic athletic conference and six school districts declaring that title ix requires schools to ban transgender students from competing in school sports based on their gender identity and threatening to withhold funding from connecticut schools if they do not comply. on may 19, the trump administration announced the indefinite extension of its cdc order that allows federal authorities at the border to immediately return migrants to their home countries. on may 26, the department of justice filed a statement of interest in an alabama federal court in support of the state’s onerous absentee ballot requirements that put black voters and voters with disabilities at risk during the covid 19 pandemic. on may 29, trump vetoed a bipartisan resolution to overturn a department of education rule and hold secretary devos accountable for failing to provide relief to students defrauded by for profit colleges. on may 29, trump issued a presidential proclamation aimed at restricting the entry of graduate students and researchers from china. on june 1, police officers and the national guard dispersed peaceful protesters outside the white house using teargas and flash bang explosions so that trump could pose for photos, while holding up a bible, in front of st. john’s episcopal church. on june 3, the department of justice filed a brief in fulton v. city of philadelphia calling on the u.s. supreme court to allow religious affiliated adoption agencies to refuse child placement into lgbtq homes. the justice department is not a party to the case. on june 12, the department of health and human services issued its final rule rolling back the non discrimination protections (section 1557) of the affordable care act. the rule will promote discrimination in medical care. on june 14, the washington post reported that the department of housing and urban development will propose a rule that would roll back obama era guidance requiring single sex homeless shelters to accept transgender people. on june 15, a 161 page regulation from the departments of homeland security and justice was published in the federal register that would make it exceedingly difficult for migrants to claim asylum in the united states. on june 19, the department of justice filed a statement of interest arguing that the equal protection clause permits idaho’s fairness in women’s sports act, which bars trans girls and women from school sports teams. on june 22, trump issued a proclamation to expand and extend his april 22 order that suspends some immigration from outside the united states. the new proclamation extends the initial green card ban in the april proclamation until december 31, 2020, and includes additional significant restrictions on several categories of temporary guest worker visas. on june 24, the white house issued a statement of administration policy opposing h.r. 51, the washington, d.c. admission act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights supports. on june 24, the white house issued a statement of administration policy opposing h.r. 7120, the george floyd justice in policing act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights supports. on june 24, the white house issued a statement of administration policy supporting h.r. 3985, the just and unifying solutions to invigorate communities everywhere (justice) act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights opposes. on june 25, the trump administration filed a brief with the u.s. supreme court arguing that the entire affordable care act should be invalidated   saying “the remainder of the aca should not be allowed to remain in effect.” the brief was filed in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic. on july 7, the consumer financial protection bureau issued its final rule on payday and car title lending   undoing consumer protections and threatening to devastate communities of color that are already facing the worst fallout of the pandemic. on july 7, the department of education’s office for civil rights issued a notice in the federal register proposing changes to the civil rights data collection, including removal of several questions regarding school and district characteristics, discipline, school finance and data disaggregation. on july 8, the departments of homeland security and justice issued a proposed rule that would bar asylum seekers from countries with disease outbreaks. the proposal does not say whether it would only apply during a global pandemic, but instead would depend on determinations made by the attorney general and homeland security secretary in consultation with the department of health and human services. on july 14, the department of justice filed a brief asking the u.s. supreme court to reinstate medicaid work requirements in arkansas after a three judge panel of the u.s. court of appeals for the d.c. circuit unanimously upheld a lower court ruling that blocked the work requirements. on july 14, the federal government executed daniel lewis lee   the first federal execution in more than 17 years after the trump administration resumed the federal death penalty. on july 15, the trump administration finalized a rule proposed by the white house council on environmental quality to change how the federal government implements the national environmental policy act (nepa). nepa is the federal law, signed by president nixon in 1970, that safeguards air, water, and land by requiring environmental assessments of major infrastructure projects. the trump administration’s rule limits the number of projects that require in depth environmental review and no longer requires federal agencies to weigh a project’s vulnerability to climate change or impact on global warming. on july 16, the commission on unalienable rights (the formation of which was announced in july 2019 by secretary of state mike pompeo) released a draft report to the public. experts described the report as undermining decades of human rights progress. on july 16, the federal government executed wesley ira purkey   the second federal execution in more than 17 years after the trump administration resumed the federal death penalty. on july 17, the federal government executed dustin lee honken   the third federal execution in more than 17 years after the trump administration resumed the federal death penalty. on july 21, trump signed a memorandum attempting to ban undocumented immigrants from counting toward congressional apportionment following the 2020 census. on july 23, secretary carson terminated the obama era affirmatively furthering fair housing (affh) rule, replacing it with a new rule called “preserving community and neighborhood choice.” affh aimed to combat segregation in housing policy. on july 28, acting secretary of homeland security chad wolf issued a memorandum to drastically curtail the deferred action for childhood arrivals (daca) program while the agency decides whether to rescind the program completely. the memo is in response to the u.s. supreme court’s decision in june 2020 that found the administration violated the administrative procedure act when it rescinded the program in september 2017. on july 30, npr reported that the u.s. census bureau would be cutting census door knocking a month short. on august 3, the bureau released a statement confirming that both field data collection and self response would be ending a month early on september 30. on august 6, trump appointed j. christian adams to serve on the u.s. commission on civil rights (usccr) and was sworn in one week later. adams, who was a member of the president’s sham voter suppression commission, was appointed to the usccr on the 55th anniversary of the voting rights act. on august 8, trump signed a series of politically motivated executive actions amid the coronavirus pandemic. one of the memos he signed defers payroll taxes from september through december 2020. trump also said that, if reelected, he would permanently terminate the payroll tax. in a letter to senate democrats on august 24, stephen goss, chief actuary of the social security administration, said that such a move would deplete social security by mid 2023. on august 18, the equal employment opportunity commission (eeoc) signaled its intent to create burdensome new rules for its conciliation process that could tip the scales in favor of employers and potentially expose workers who file workplace discrimination claims, as well as potential witnesses, to retaliation. on august 19, the u.s. agency for international development (usaid) released an updated draft policy on gender and women’s empowerment that eliminated any reference to transgender people or contraceptives. on august 21, the white house issued a statement of administration policy opposing h.r. 8015, the delivering for america act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights supports. on august 26, eric dreiband, head of the justice department’s civil rights division, sent letters to the governors of pennsylvania, michigan, new jersey, and new york (all democrats) requesting information under the civil rights of institutionalized persons act (cripa) about the coronavirus response of public nursing homes in their states. the move, which occurred during the republican national convention, was viewed as a political move targeting democrats to distract from the president’s failed response to the pandemic. on august 26, the department of education issued a “dear educators and stakeholders letter” announcing the withdrawal of eight guidance documents, including in its rationale that previous support the department expressed for diversity was advocating for “policy preferences and positions beyond the requirements of the constitution and title vi.” on august 26, the federal government executed lezmond charles mitchell   the fourth federal execution in more than 17 years after the trump administration resumed the federal death penalty. on august 28, the federal government executed keith dwayne nelson   the fifth federal execution in more than 17 years after the trump administration resumed the federal death penalty. on august 31, the department of education issued a notice in the federal register that it had rescinded almost 100 guidance documents issued since the 1990s. on september 2, trump sent a memorandum to the attorney general and the director of the office of management and budget that threatened to pull federal funding from “anarchist jurisdictions”   cities “that are permitting anarchy, violence and destruction.” this was also viewed as a political move targeting cities where people are protesting police brutality and systemic racism. on september 3, the u.s. equal employment opportunity commission issued an opinion letter abandoning its long standing interpretation of section 707 of the civil rights act of 1964. on september 4, the department of housing and urban development issued a final rule that severely weakens the disparate impact tool under the fair housing act, which will make millions of people more vulnerable to housing discrimination. on september 4, russell vought, the director of the office of management and budget, sent a memo to the heads of executive departments and agencies instructing them to end anti racist trainings that address white privilege and critical race theory   caalling them “divisive, anti american propaganda.” on september 8, the department of justice filed a brief in support of an indiana catholic school that was sued for firing a teacher in a same sex marriage. on september 8, a whistleblower complaint from a department of homeland security official alleged that top dhs officials, including chad wolf and ken cuccinelli, directed analysts to downplay threats from violent white supremacy and russian election interference. on september 17, the ap reported that the department of education is threatening to withhold some federal funding from connecticut school districts if they follow a state policy that allows transgender girls to compete as girls in high school sports. on september 22, trump issued an executive order prohibiting federal agencies, federal contractors, and grantees from engaging in anti discrimination workplace diversity trainings the administration deemed “divisive.” on september 22, the department of labor proposed a rule that would make it easier for employers to misclassify workers and deny them minimum wage and overtime protections. on september 22, the federal government executed william emmett lecroy, jr.   the sixth federal execution in more than 17 years after the trump administration resumed the federal death penalty. on september 22, the trump administration asked the u.s. supreme court to schedule oral arguments in a case related to trump’s july 2020 memorandum attempting to ban undocumented immigrants from counting toward congressional apportionment following the 2020 census. on september 10, a three judge district court had barred the administration from implementing the memo. on september 24, the department of housing and urban development issued its final rule to gut the disparate impact tool under the fair housing act, which will make it harder to challenge systemic racism by housing providers, financial institutions, and insurance companies that deprive people of the services and opportunities they need. on september 24, the federal government executed christopher andre vialva   the seventh federal execution in more than 17 years after the trump administration resumed the federal death penalty. on september 30, the state department told congress that it would allow only 15,000 refugees to resettle in the united states in the 2021 fiscal year, which began the following day. on october 1, the white house issued a statement of administration policy opposing h.r. 8406, the heroes act, which the leadership conference on civil and human rights supports. on october 6, microsoft revealed that the department of labor’s office of federal contract compliance programs (ofccp) contacted the company over its commitments to increasing diversity. according to microsoft, “the ofccp has focused on whether microsoft’s commitment to double the number of black and african american people managers, senior individual contributors and senior leaders in our u.s. workforce by 2025 could constitute unlawful discrimination on the basis of race, which would violate title vii of the civil rights act.” the ofccp contacted wells fargo for the same reason. on october 7, the trump administration filed an emergency application with the u.s. supreme court in an attempt to halt the 2020 census count early. the application was filed after the ninth circuit upheld a district court’s ruling that the administration could not stop the count at the end of september. on october 8, a justice department memo suspended all diversity and inclusion training for the department’s employees and managers in compliance with trump’s recent executive order banning anti bias trainings. on october 21, trump signed an executive order that could expand his ability to hire and fire tens of thousands of federal employees. the order would allow federal agencies to reclassify certain workers, which would strip them of job protections. the national president of the american federation of government employees referred to the order as “the most profound undermining of the civil service in our lifetimes.” on november 1, the centers for medicare and medicaid services and the department of the treasury approved georgia’s waiver request under section 1332 of the affordable care act, which allows the state to exit the federal marketplace without creating a state based marketplace to replace it. this will endanger coverage and access to care for tens of thousands of people. on november 2, trump signed an executive order establishing the president’s advisory 1776 commission to “promote patriotic education.” the commission, teased by trump in remarks on september 17, was viewed as a political move aimed at censoring the teaching of american history and as an attack on the new york times’ pulitzer prize winning 1619 project, which details this nation’s history beginning when the first enslaved africans were brought to america. on november 9, in a memo to u.s. attorneys, attorney general william barr authorized the opening of election fraud investigations “if there are clear and apparently credible allegations of irregularities that, if true, could potentially impact the outcome of a federal election in an individual state.” the memo, for which there was no factual basis, was viewed as an attempt to sow chaos and led to the resignation of richard pilger, director of the doj criminal division’s election crimes branch. on november 13, u.s. citizenship and immigration services announced a revised naturalization civics exam that will create unfair and unnecessary obstacles to lawful permanent residents pursuing u.s. citizenship. on november 16, the social security administration finalized a rule that could make it more difficult for people who apply for disability benefits to appeal denials by allowing agency attorneys to hear appeals rather than impartial and independent administrative law judges. on november 19, the federal government executed orlando cordia hall   the eighth federal execution in more than 17 years after the trump administration resumed the federal death penalty. on november 24, cnn reported that the justice department’s executive office for immigration review was ordering some immigrants facing deportation to file to stay in the united states   rushing the process and increasing the likelihood of deportation. the orders appeared to be signed by supervisory judges, not judges assigned to the cases. on december 7, the department of labor’s office of federal contract compliance programs announced a final rule that expands the ability of federal contractors to claim religious exemptions from federal nondiscrimination laws and regulations, allowing them to discriminate against people of color, religious minorities, women, and lgbtq people. on december 8, the white house issued a statement of administration policy opposing the conference report to accompany h.r. 6395   the national defense authorization act. their opposition was based in large part on the inclusion of language that would rename all bases and other military assets named for the confederacy. on december 10, the federal government executed brandon bernard   the ninth federal execution in more than 17 years after the trump administration resumed the federal death penalty. on december 11, the departments of homeland security and justice finalized a sweeping new rule that creates additional bars to asylum eligibility and limits who can qualify for protection. people who claim they will face persecution based on gender or gang violence, for example, would generally not qualify for asylum under these new rules. on december 11, the federal government executed alfred bourgeois   the tenth federal execution in more than 17 years after the trump administration resumed the federal death penalty. on december 12, justice department lawyers acknowledged that the expulsion of 66 unaccompanied migrant children (without a court hearing or asylum interview) by u.s. border officials represented a contravention of a november district court ruling. on december 16, the department of justice finalized a rule that strips the executive office for immigration review of its ability to make a reasoned decision on a fully developed record and blocks people in immigration proceedings from mounting an effective appeal. on january 8, the department of education’s office for civil rights released a memorandum misconstruing the u.s. supreme court’s decision in bostock v. clayton county and its application to title ix of the education amendments of 1972   refusing to apply bostock, which prohibits discrimination against lgbtq people, to federal education law. on january 8, the centers for medicare and medicaid services approved a new medicaid financing system in tennessee   a 10 year “experiment”   threatening health care for the 1.4 million people in the state’s medicaid program. on january 12, the department of health and human services finalized a rule that allows social service providers that receive government funding to discriminate based on sexual orientation and gender identity. on january 12, a letter from the office of the inspector general at the department of commerce outlined whistleblower complaints that census bureau director dr. steven dillingham ordered staff to prioritize the unconstitutional and premature production of a technical report that would include data on documented and undocumented immigrants in the united states   a directive motivated by partisan objectives. dr. dillingham resigned six days later following demands from civil rights organizations and members of congress that he step down. on january 13, the federal government executed lisa montgomery   the eleventh federal execution in more than 17 years after the trump administration resumed the federal death penalty. on january 14, the federal government executed corey johnson   the twelfth federal execution in more than 17 years after the trump administration resumed the federal death penalty. on january 16, the federal government executed dustin john higgs   the thirteenth federal execution in more than 17 years after the trump administration resumed the federal death penalty. on january 18, which was mlk day, trump’s 1776 commission issued a report calling for “patriotic education,” comparing progressivism to fascism and communism, and justifying the nation’s founding on the basis of slavery. the leadership conference on civil and human rights opposed the following trump nominees: confirmed: withdrawn: returned to the president, not re nominated: the leadership conference on civil and human rights expressed serious concerns about the following nominations/appointments: on november 21, 2017, the leadership conference spoke out about reports that thomas brunell would be appointed to serve as deputy director of the u.s. census bureau, saying that his “appointment would undermine the credibility of the bureau’s role as a fundamentally nonpartisan statistical agency.” brunell withdrew from consideration on february 12, 2018. in a march 2019 report, the leadership conference education fund commented on the appointment of jeffrey anderson. on november 21, 2017, the president announced his intent to appoint anderson, a fellow at the conservative hudson institute, as director of the justice department’s bureau of justice statistics (bjs). anderson had no prior criminal justice experience, and his sole statistical experience appeared to be the creation of a college football strength of schedule ranking system. on march 7, 2019, the leadership conference spoke out about the nomination of shannon goessling to lead the department of justice’s office on violence against women, citing her anti immigrant, anti lgbtq, anti racial justice record. on may 13, 2019, the leadership conference announced opposition to judicial nominees who refused to state unequivocally that the landmark brown v. board of education decision was correctly decided. on may 4, 2020, the leadership conference and members of its fair courts task force wrote to senate majority leader mitch mcconnell and senate judiciary committee chairman lindsey graham urging them to halt the consideration of lifetime judicial nominees and instead focus on support and resources to address the covid 19 pandemic. on july 29, 2020, the leadership conference joined a letter of opposition to anthony tata’s nomination to serve as under secretary of defense for policy. tata’s nomination was withdrawn in august and he was instead designated “the official performing the duties of the deputy undersecretary of defense for policy reporting to the acting undersecretary of defense for policy dr. james anderson.” tata replaced anderson following his resignation in november. on august 20, 2020, the leadership conference wrote to the senate judiciary committee urging members not to advance the slate of nominees to the united states sentencing commission that trump announced on august 12, 2020. on september 23, 2020, the leadership conference spoke out against the nomination of chad wolf to permanently serve as secretary of homeland security. on january 11, 2021, wolf resigned from his acting position. on november 24, 2020, the leadership conference criticized thomas brunell’s appointment to the census bureau’s scientific advisory committee, saying that it further damages the bureau’s reputation and makes it harder to rebuild public confidence in the census bureau and the vital statistics it produces. civilrights.org is the joint website of the leadership conference on civil and human rights & the leadership conference education fund. ©2025 the leadership conference on civil and human rights/the leadership conference education fund. all rights reserved.

profile sections local tv featured more from nbc follow nbc news news alerts there are no new alerts at this time president elect donald trump told nbc news on thursday that one of his first priorities upon taking office in january would be to make the border “strong and powerful.” when questioned about his campaign promise of mass deportations, trump said his administration would have “no choice” but to carry them out. trump said he considers his sweeping victory over vice president kamala harris a mandate "to bring common sense" to the country. "we obviously have to make the border strong and powerful and, and we have to   at the same time, we want people to come into our country," he said. "and you know, i’m not somebody that says, 'no, you can’t come in.' we want people to come in." as a candidate, trump had repeatedly vowed to carry out the "largest deportation effort in american history." asked about the cost of his plan, he said, "it’s not a question of a price tag. it’s not   really, we have no choice. when people have killed and murdered, when drug lords have destroyed countries, and now they’re going to go back to those countries because they’re not staying here. there is no price tag." it's unclear how many undocumented immigrants there are in the u.s., but acting ice director patrick j. lechleitner told nbc news in july that a mass deportation effort would be a huge logistical and financial challenge. two former trump administration officials involved in immigration during his first term told nbc news that the effort would require cooperation among a number of federal agencies, including the justice department and the pentagon. trump's win included record gains among latino voters, who democrats had tried to capture by pointing to trump's rhetoric on immigrants and a pro trump comedian's racist joke about puerto rico. in thursday’s phone interview, he partially credited his message on immigration as a reason he won the race, saying, "they want to have borders, and they like people coming in, but they have to come in with love for the country. they have to come in legally." trump also noted the diverse coalition of voters he attracted, pointing to gains he made among latino voters, young voters, women and asian american voters from 2020. "i started to see realignment could happen because the democrats are not in line with the thinking of the country," the president elect said. "you can’t have defund the police, these kind of things. they don’t want to give up and they don’t work, and the people understand that." trump also spoke about his phone calls with harris and president joe biden since the election. "very nice calls, very respectful both ways," trump said, describing the conversations, adding that harris "talked about transition, and she said she’d like it to be smooth as can be, which i agree with, of course." in her concession speech at howard university on wednesday, harris said she told trump, "we will help him and his team with their transition and that we will engage in a peaceful transfer of power." biden, addressing the nation in remarks from the white house on thursday morning, urged voters to "accept the choice the country made" in re electing trump. trump also said that he and biden on the phone agreed to have lunch together "very shortly." he also said he's spoken to "probably" 70 world leaders since wednesday morning, including israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu, which the president elect described as "a very good talk." trump also said that he spoken with ukrainian president volodymyr zelenskyy, but didn't divulge details about that conversation. he added that he had not yet spoken with russian president vladimir putin, but "i think we’ll speak." over the course of the campaign, trump promised to end russia's war with ukraine if elected, saying in september that he would negotiate a deal "that's good for both sides." kristen welker is the moderator of "meet the press." alexandra marquez is a politics reporter for nbc news. © 2025 nbcuniversal media, llc

protecting civil rights and expanding individual opportunity: today, president donald j. trump signed an historic executive order that protects the civil rights of all americans and expands individual opportunity by terminating radical dei preferencing in federal contracting and directing federal agencies to relentlessly combat private sector discrimination. it enforces long standing federal statutes and faithfully advances the constitution’s promise of colorblind equality before the law. this comprehensive order is the most important federal civil rights measure in decades: restoring the values of individual dignity, hard work, and excellence: individual dignity, hard work, and excellence are fundamental to american greatness. this executive order reaffirms these values by ending the biden harris administration’s anti constitutional and deeply demeaning “equity” mandates, terminating dei, and protecting civil rights: president trump promised and delivered: president trump promised to terminate dei in the federal government, protect equal opportunity, and force schools to end discriminatory admissions policies, and he delivered. every man and woman should have the opportunity to go as far as their hard work, individual initiative, and competence can take them. in america, excellence, grit, and determination is our strength.

climate change global climate agreements: successes and failures backgrounder by lindsay maizland and clara fong january 21, 2025 renewing america myanmar myanmar’s troubled history backgrounder by lindsay maizland january 31, 2022 health how tobacco laws could help close the racial gap on cancer interactive by olivia angelino, thomas j. bollyky, elle ruggiero and isabella turilli february 1, 2023 global health program trade tariffs on trading partners: can the president actually do that? report by inu manak and helena kopans johnson february 4, 2025 greenberg center for geoeconomic studies oil and petroleum products academic webinar: the geopolitics of oil webinar with carolyn kissane and irina a. faskianos april 12, 2023 artificial intelligence (ai) what could possibly go right with our ai future? a conversation with reid hoffman virtual event with reid hoffman and deven j. parekh january 30, 2025 donald trump could take several early actions as president that could draw legal scrutiny, including on immigration, climate, and security policy. article by john b. bellinger iii november 20, 2024 1:51 pm (est) john b. bellinger iii is adjunct senior fellow for international and national security law at the council on foreign relations. president elect donald trump is likely to take numerous actions domestically and internationally that will raise legal controversies just as he did in his first term. some will be entirely new initiatives, while others will return to policies adopted during his first term but reversed by president biden. many will face legal challenges in u.s. courts and potentially even international tribunals. more on: international law donald trump immigration and migration climate change nato (north atlantic treaty organization) trump has vowed to “carry out the largest deportation effort in american history.” any plan to deport a large number of the more than eleven million undocumented immigrants in the united states would require a substantial increase in the number of immigration officials and judges to carry it out, and it would be costly. trump has said he is considering using the u.s. military and relying on the 1798 alien enemies act to facilitate deportations and internment of illegal immigrants. both proposals would almost certainly face legal challenges in the courts. the 1878 posse comitatus act restricts the use of the u.s. military for domestic law enforcement, and the alien enemies act has only been used for deportation or internments during declared wars, most recently for the controversial internment of japanese americans during world war ii. trump has also said, “i will ban refugee resettlement from terror infested areas like the gaza strip, and we will seal our border and bring back the travel ban.” it’s not clear precisely what trump means by these pledges, but he is likely to reinstate some form of the controversial travel bans for individuals from middle eastern countries and to limit or prohibit refugee admissions from those countries. as in his first term, any new travel bans will likely face court challenges from human rights and civil liberties groups. it’s unlikely trump would try to withdraw from the north atlantic treaty organization (nato) anytime soon, though he will certainly again push other nato members to increase their defense spending and could try to pull out of the north atlantic treaty if they do not. congress included a provision in the national defense authorization act for 2024 prohibiting a president from withdrawing from the north atlantic treaty without the approval of congress. the trump administration could potentially take the stance that the provision is an unconstitutional restriction on the president’s powers. however, it would be awkward for trump to ignore the restriction, given that it was co sponsored with senator tim kaine (d va) by senator marco rubio (r fl), trump’s nominee for secretary of state. a curation of original analyses, data visualizations, and commentaries, examining the debates and efforts to improve health worldwide. weekly. trump could also withdraw the united states once again from the paris climate agreement. he did so during his first term, but president joe biden rejoined on his first day in office. trump could go further this time and try to withdraw from the un framework agreement on climate change, a treaty that the united states joined in 1992 during the george h.w. bush administration and under which the paris agreement (which is an executive agreement that does not rise to the level of a treaty requiring senate approval) was negotiated. because the un framework agreement is a treaty approved by the senate (by a two thirds vote), some scholars argue that trump could not withdraw from it without the same senate approval. this question has never been resolved by the courts, but environmental advocates would certainly challenge its legality, likely requiring several years of litigation to resolve. a second trump administration is likely to reverse the multilateralism of the biden administration, including cutting off funding to, withdrawing from, and imposing sanctions on various international organizations. this is especially true of those that trump believes are dominated by states hostile to the united states or israel. more on: international law donald trump immigration and migration climate change nato (north atlantic treaty organization) for example, the trump administration is likely to refuse funding for the un relief and works agency for palestine (unrwa). earlier this year, in response to evidence of involvement by unrwa employees in the october 7, 2023, attacks in israel, congress suspended funding to unrwa until march 2025. president trump had previously cut off funding to unrwa in 2018 and is unlikely to continue it, especially after israel passed a law last month prohibiting unrwa from operating inside israel. trump could also withdraw again from the un educational, scientific and cultural organization (unesco). the biden administration rejoined the body in 2023 over the objections of republicans in congress after the trump administration pulled out in 2017. trump had also withdrawn from the un human rights council in 2018. the biden administration rejoined the council in 2021 for a three year term but earlier this year decided not to seek reelection for a second united states term. trump could also potentially reimpose u.s. sanctions on the international criminal court (icc) and its prosecutor, karim a.a. khan, to punish him for seeking arrest warrants for israeli prime minister netanyahu and former defense minister gallant for alleged war crimes in gaza. trump’s former national security advisor robert o’brien, who remains a close advisor to trump and who could be appointed to a top position in the new administration, has said “the corrupt prosecutors and judges” should be targeted with sanctions, including visa denial and asset freezing; republicans in congress have drafted legislation to levy such sanctions. the first trump administration had imposed sanctions on the then icc prosecutor and judges in response to the investigation of u.s. officials for alleged abuse of detainees in afghanistan. the biden administration terminated the sanctions against icc officials after khan decided to suspend the investigation. although the biden administration has criticized khan’s indictment of israeli officials, it has provided support (reportedly despite objections from the department of defense) to khan’s indictment of vladimir putin for war crimes in ukraine. given trump’s unusual affinity for putin and stated desire to swiftly resolve the ukraine conflict, a trump administration could decide to end u.s. support to the icc prosecution of putin. early in his administration, if not the first day, he is expected to order the termination of special counsel jack smith’s prosecutions of trump and former trump administration officials relating to the former president’s retention of classified documents at mar a lago and alleged incitement of the january 6, 2021, attacks on the capitol. smith reportedly plans to resign before trump takes office. trump could potentially order an acting department of justice official to take these actions, or wait for the senate confirmation of his new attorney general. a trump administration could also order the release of all the internal communications of, or interviews conducted by, smith’s special counsel team with the hope of finding evidence of political bias, though there is a risk that releasing witness interviews and other internal information could actually be embarrassing to president elect trump. more generally, trump appears intent on exercising greater presidential control over the department of justice. in addition to his nominating one of his most ardent supporters, controversial florida congressman matt gaetz, to be his attorney general, he has said he plans to appoint three of the attorneys who defended him in his criminal cases to senior positions in the department of justice, including deputy attorney general and solicitor general. presidents have traditionally not interfered with criminal investigations by the department of justice, but it is not clear whether trump and his white house will continue to observe this norm. trump has said that he “absolutely” will pardon some of the more than 1,400 people who have been charged in connection with the january 6 attack on the capitol, whom he has called “patriots” and “hostages,” prompting a rebuke by at least one federal judge hearing the cases. it could be easier for trump to pardon persons who have pled guilty or been convicted of less serious, non violent offenses and who have not been sentenced to prison time. it could be more difficult politically for trump to pardon rioters convicted of more serious offenses, such as assaults on police officers, especially if law enforcement organizations object. this work represents the views and opinions solely of the author. the council on foreign relations is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher, and takes no institutional positions on matters of policy. international law congress should close the ‘crimes against humanity’ loophole article by david j. scheffer and kristin smith february 21, 2023 international institutions and global governance program immigration and migration climate change is fueling migration. do climate migrants have legal protections? in brief by mia prange december 19, 2022 united kingdom a new roadblock for scottish independence article by david j. scheffer december 9, 2022 international institutions and global governance program democratic republic of congo war returns to the democratic republic of congo: what to know article by stuart reid and mariel ferragamo february 7, 2025 foreign policy trump floats u.s. control of gaza, and other headlines of the day article by cfr.org editors february 5, 2025 cuba can the united states send undocumented immigrants to guantánamo bay? expert brief by john b. bellinger iii february 4, 2025
donald j. trump has promised to appeal, but he may face limits on his ability to travel and to vote as he campaigns for the white house. by jesse mckinley and maggie astor the conviction of former president donald j. trump on thursday is just the latest step in his legal odyssey in new york’s court system. the judge, juan m. merchan, set mr. trump’s sentencing for july 11, at which point he could be sentenced to as much as four years behind bars, or to probation. it won’t stop him from running for president, though: there is no legal prohibition on felons doing that. no constitutional provision would stop him even from serving as president from a prison cell, though in practice that would trigger a crisis that courts would almost certainly have to resolve. his ability to vote   for himself, presumably   depends on whether he is sentenced to prison. florida, where he is registered, requires felons convicted there to complete their full sentence, including parole or probation, before regaining voting rights. but when floridians are convicted in another state, florida defers to the laws of that state, and new york disenfranchises felons only while they are in prison. former president donald j. trump faced 34 felony charges of falsifying business records, related to the reimbursement of hush money paid to the porn star stormy daniels in order to cover up a sex scandal around the 2016 presidential election. “because florida recognizes voting rights restoration in the state of conviction, and because new york’s law states that those with a felony conviction do not lose their right to vote unless they are incarcerated during the election, then trump will not lose his right to vote in this case unless he is in prison on election day,” said blair bowie, a lawyer at the campaign legal center, a nonprofit watchdog group. mr. trump will almost certainly appeal his conviction, after months of criticizing the case and attacking the manhattan district attorney, who brought it, and justice merchan, who presided over his trial.

 trump administration supported by transcript the 5 to 4 decision upholding president trump’s travel ban basically did two things. the majority said that the president had been given vast authority over immigration and national security by congress and that he acted consistent with that authority. the second thing it did was reject the claim that the travel ban was infected by religious discrimination. “donald j. trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of muslims entering the united states.” the majority discounted the president’s statements and said the role of the courts was to look at the face of the presidential proclamation issued in september, and that proclamation, the court said, was lawful. the supreme court has occasionally looked at the scope of presidential power, and it’s gone both ways. it imposed some limits on president george w. bush’s ability to hold people in guantánamo bay. it rejected president truman’s attempt to seize the steel industry during the korean war. and it forced president nixon to turn over tapes concerning the watergate scandal that led to his departure from office.