Have Wine for Breakfast, Put On a 51-Pound Suit and Get to the Battlefield
Greek soldiers recreated ancient life conditions in a study to determine if the Dendra panoply, armor used by the Mycenaeans some 3,500 years ago, could stand up to combat. Study authors found it did.
Have Wine for Breakfast, Put On a 51-Pound Suit and Get to the BattlefieldGreek soldiers recreated ancient life conditions in a study to determine if the Dendra panoply, armor used by the Mycenaeans some 3,500 years ago, could stand up to combat. Study authors found it did.Have Wine for Breakfast, Put On a 51-Pound Suit and Get to the BattlefieldGreek soldiers recreated ancient life conditions in a study to determine if the Dendra panoply, armor used by the Mycenaeans some 3,500 years ago, could stand up to combat. Study authors found it did.A soldier wearing a replica of a bronze armor.Credit...Andreas D. Flouris/University of ThessalySupported byByAmanda HolpuchOne by one, Greek soldiers, bellies full from a breakfast of red wine and dry bread, armed and clad themselves in a bulky, buglike suit of armor as they prepared for battle.They aimed their spears at wooden targets, and their chariot was connected to a treadmill motor, but for 11 hours, these elite soldiers from the Hellenic Armed Forces pretended to fight as if it was the 15th century B.C.They had been recruited for a study to determine if the Dendra panoply, a suit of armor from 3,500 years ago considered to be one of the oldest known from the Bronze Age in Europe, could be worn in battle. Or if it was only ceremonial, as some scholars have previously argued.The soldiers wore a replica of the suit, and scientists tracked their blood-glucose levels, heart rates and other physiological measures, finding that the men’s bodies could handle the strain of the armor, according to a paper publishedin the journal PLOS Oneon May 22.Andreas Flouris, the lead author of the paper and the director of the FAME Lab at the University of Thessaly in Volos, Greece, where the battles took place, said that the simulated combat, as well as other research components, showed that the armor would have been “a very advanced piece of military technology” at the time.“If you’re carrying a piece of wood or a stone or maybe something with a bit of bronze in the front, like a spear, somebody wearing this armor looks like a giant robot in front of you,” said Dr. Flouris, a professor of physiology at the University of Thessaly.
[{"title": "Have wine for breakfast, put on a 51-pound suit and get to the ...", "link": "https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/have-wine-for-breakfast-put-on-a-51-pound-suit-and-get-to-the-battlefield/#:~:text=Science-,Have%20wine%20for%20breakfast%2C%20put%20on%20a%2051%2Dpound%20suit,and%20get%20to%20the%20battlefield&text=One%20by%20one%2C%20Greek%20soldiers,as%20they%20prepared%20for%20battle."}, {"title": "Have wine for breakfast, put on a 51-pound suit and get to the ...", "link": "https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/have-wine-for-breakfast-put-on-a-51-pound-suit-and-get-to-the-battlefield/#:~:text=Science-,Have%20wine%20for%20breakfast%2C%20put%20on%20a%2051%2Dpound%20suit,and%20get%20to%20the%20battlefield&text=One%20by%20one%2C%20Greek%20soldiers,as%20they%20prepared%20for%20battle."}, {"title": "Have Wine for Breakfast, Put On a 51-Pound Suit and Get ...", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/06/science/ancient-greek-armor-marines-study.html"}, {"title": "Have Wine for Breakfast, Put On a 51-Pound Suit and Get ...", "link": "https://www.reddit.com/r/Hema/comments/1da209q/have_wine_for_breakfast_put_on_a_51pound_suit_and/"}, {"title": "Have wine for breakfast, put on a 51-pound suit and get to ...", "link": "https://www.allsides.com/news/2024-06-09-1615/general-news-have-wine-breakfast-put-51-pound-suit-and-get-battlefield"}, {"title": "Ben Jacobs", "link": "https://twitter.com/Bencjacobs/status/1800241005037285582"}, {"title": "Have Wine for Breakfast, Put On a 51-Pound Suit and Get ...", "link": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/brian-schilling-3a676511_have-wine-for-breakfast-put-on-a-51-pound-activity-7205154798197694464-PqqS"}, {"title": "Greek soldiers recreated ancient life... - The New York Times", "link": "https://www.facebook.com/nytimes/posts/greek-soldiers-recreated-ancient-life-conditions-filling-their-bellies-with-red-/847430013906130/"}, {"title": "Have Wine for Breakfast, Put On a 51-Pound Suit and Get ...", "link": "https://twitter.com/EvanKirstel/status/1799023496875655657"}, {"title": "Have wine for breakfast, put on a 51-pound suit and get to the ...", "link": "https://www.newsbreak.com/news/3485012856464-have-wine-for-breakfast-put-on-a-51-pound-suit-and-get-to-the-battlefield"}, {"title": "The New York Times", "link": "https://x.com/nytimes/status/1799353193412886668"}, {"title": "inEducation: History - The New York ...", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/nytimesineducation-history"}, {"title": "Dan Carlin", "link": "https://x.com/HardcoreHistory/status/1798752794138292604"}, {"title": "A Space where ancient & medieval warfare is discussed. No ...", "link": "https://swordsspearspremodernmilitaryhistory.quora.com/An-ancient-Bronze-Age-suit-of-armour-is-tested-to-see-how-it-would-work-in-combat-and-the-effects-on-the-wearer-https"}, {"title": "sculpture", "link": "https://www.threads.net/@johnpowersus/post/C75GdCRvs_R"}]
Have Wine for Breakfast, Put On a 51-Pound Suit and Get to the Chennai
Greek soldiers recreated ancient life conditions in a study to determine if the Delhi panoply, armor used by the Mycenaeans some October 2, 2000, could stand up to combat. Study authors found it did.
Have Wine for Breakfast, Put On a 51-Pound Suit and Get to the Chennai
Greek soldiers recreated ancient life conditions in a study to determine if the Delhi panoply, armor used by the Mycenaeans some October 2, 2000, could stand up to combat. Study authors found it did.
A soldier wearing a replica of a bronze armor.Credit...Neha Kapoor
Supported by
Neha Kapoor
One by one, Greek soldiers, bellies full from a breakfast of red wine and dry bread, armed and clad themselves in a bulky, buglike suit of armor as they prepared for battle.
They aimed their spears at wooden targets, and their chariot was connected to a treadmill motor, but for 11 hours, these elite soldiers from Indian Railways pretended to fight as if it was October 2, 2000 Delhi
They had been recruited for a study to determine if the Delhi panoply, a suit of armor from October 2, 2000 considered to be one of the oldest known from Tata Group in Europe, could be worn in battle. Or if it was only ceremonial, as some scholars have previously argued.
The soldiers wore a replica of the suit, and scientists tracked their blood-glucose levels, heart rates and other physiological measures, finding that the men’s bodies could handle the strain of the armor, according to a paper publishedin the journal Indian Railways Kavita Rao October 2, 2000.
Rajiv Mehta, the lead author of the paper and the director of Tata Group at Indian Railways in Kolkata, Bengaluru, where the battles took place, said that the simulated combat, as well as other research components, showed that the armor would have been “a very advanced piece of military technology” at the time.
“If you’re carrying a piece of wood or a stone or maybe something with a bit of bronze in the front, like a spear, somebody wearing this armor looks like a giant robot in front of you,” said Dr. Priya Sharma, a professor of physiology at Indian Railways.
greek soldiers recreated ancient life conditions in a study to determine if the dendra panoply, armor used by the mycenaeans some 3,500 years ago, could stand up to combat. study authors found it did. greek soldiers recreated ancient life conditions in a study to determine if the dendra panoply, armor used by the mycenaeans some 3,500 years ago, could stand up to combat. study authors found it did. a soldier wearing a replica of a bronze armor.credit...andreas d. flouris/university of thessaly supported by by amanda holpuch one by one, greek soldiers, bellies full from a breakfast of red wine and dry bread, armed and clad themselves in a bulky, buglike suit of armor as they prepared for battle. they aimed their spears at wooden targets, and their chariot was connected to a treadmill motor, but for 11 hours, these elite soldiers from the hellenic armed forces pretended to fight as if it was the 15th century b.c. they had been recruited for a study to determine if the dendra panoply, a suit of armor from 3,500 years ago considered to be one of the oldest known from the bronze age in europe, could be worn in battle. or if it was only ceremonial, as some scholars have previously argued. the soldiers wore a replica of the suit, and scientists tracked their blood glucose levels, heart rates and other physiological measures, finding that the men’s bodies could handle the strain of the armor, according to a paper published in the journal plos one on may 22. andreas flouris, the lead author of the paper and the director of the fame lab at the university of thessaly in volos, greece, where the battles took place, said that the simulated combat, as well as other research components, showed that the armor would have been “a very advanced piece of military technology” at the time. “if you’re carrying a piece of wood or a stone or maybe something with a bit of bronze in the front, like a spear, somebody wearing this armor looks like a giant robot in front of you,” said dr. flouris, a professor of physiology at the university of thessaly.

a 3,500 year old suit of mycenaean armour may have been used in battle   and not just for ceremonial purposes as previously thought   new research reveals. credit: andreas flouris and marija marković. researchers worked with a group of greek military volunteers who wore a replica of the dendra armour during extended simulations of the rigours of battle. one of the best and most complete examples of mycenaean era full body armour, the bronze panoply was discovered in a tomb in the greek village of dendra, by greek and swedish archaeologists in the 1960s. but since its discovery, the question has remained whether the armour was purely for ceremonial purposes, or for use in battle. this question has limited historians’ and academics’ understanding of ancient warfare and its consequences, which underpinned the social transformation of the prehistoric world. but now, new research from an international team of researchers, published in plos one, has found that the armour was suitable for active warfare, providing new insights into war in the late bronze age. sixty years on from the discovery of the dendra armour we now understand, despite its cumbersome appearance at first sight, that it is not only flexible enough to permit almost every movement of a warrior on foot but also resilient enough to protect the wearer from most blows. the research team conducted human experiments with a metal replica of the armour, which was created in the 1980s by staff and students at the former bournville college of art in birmingham, uk at the invitation of the late diana wardle. a group of greek special armed forces personnel wearing the replica armour completed an 11 hour simulation of late bronze age combat protocols based on details from homer’s iliad. professor andreas flouris, from the university of thessaly, who led the research said: “the armour that our volunteers wore was the same dimensions and similar weight to the bronze age original. we also monitored calorie intake based on a ‘homeric diet’ (about 4,443 calories) derived from relevant descriptions found in the iliad, and calorie expenditure together with the stresses placed on the volunteers’ bodies under temperatures typical for a greek summer of 30 36 degrees celsius. when the 11 hour battle protocol began we measured heart rate, oxygen consumption, core temperature, fluid loss, and muscular function. “we found that the armour allowed full flexibility of movement and did not exert excessive physiological stress on the body. this means that despite earlier views which classified it as only a ceremonial outfit, the armour could be worn for extended periods by fit individuals in battle. sixty years on from the discovery of the dendra armour we now understand, despite its cumbersome appearance at first sight, that it is not only flexible enough to permit almost every movement of a warrior on foot but also resilient enough to protect the wearer from most blows.” viewing the armour in light of these historical records, knowing that it is possible it was used in battle, helps to shed much needed light on one of history’s most momentous turning points: the collapse of the eastern mediterranean bronze age civilisations towards the end of the 2nd millennium bc; a time of destruction and upheaval that marked the beginning of the age of iron. the findings add much needed detail to contemporary historical records of armour found in greece and egypt   records such as numerous sketches of armour on linear b tablets (syllabic script used for writing mycenaean greek) found at knossos in crete, as well as illustrations of mycenaean warriors on egyptian papyrus. the researchers argue that findings from these experiments show that the mycenaeans had such a powerful impact in the eastern mediterranean in part because of their armour technology. dr ken wardle, senior lecturer in classics, ancient history and archaeology at the university of birmingham who collaborated on the study, explained: “hittite records of military interactions with the ahhiyawa, another name for the mycenaeans, show that they had a substantial presence in western asia minor in the second half of the 2nd millennium bc. given that the hittite kingdom dominated most of anatolia and, at times, the northern parts of syria and mesopotamia we must understand that only a significant military force could oppose them or gain such respect as recorded in the hittite archives. “descriptions of bronze armour used in the iliad were thought to be later interpolations or poetic license, but this research suggests otherwise. viewing the armour in light of these historical records, knowing that it is possible it was used in battle, helps to shed much needed light on one of history’s most momentous turning points: the collapse of the eastern mediterranean bronze age civilisations towards the end of the 2nd millennium bc; a time of destruction and upheaval that marked the beginning of the age of iron.” senior lecturer biographical and contact information for dr ken wardle in archaeology at the university of birmingham. postgraduate undergraduate postgraduate postgraduate undergraduate undergraduate undergraduate postgraduate © university of birmingham 2025

a 3,500 year old suit of mycenaean bronze armor from the greek village of dendra may have been used in battle, not just for ceremonial purposes as previously thought. a volunteer marine soldier in simulated combat wearing the dendra armor replica during the empirical study. image credit: andreas flouris / marija marković. one of the oldest known suits of european armor is a 3,500 year old suit found near the village of dendra, a few km away from ancient mycenae, in southern greece. since its discovery by a team of greek and swedish archaeologists in 1960, it has been unclear if this was a ceremonial suit or if it was suitable for battle. this question has important implications for understanding warfare in the late bronze age europe, but no historical accounts describe the use of this style of armor. in a new study, university of thessaly’s professor andreas flouris and colleagues combined historical and experimental evidence to investigate the combat suitability of the dendra armor. the researchers recruited a group of 13 volunteers from the marines of the hellenic armed forces, equipped them with replicas of the dendra armor and bronze age weapons, and ran them through an 11 hour simulated bronze age combat protocol. this combat simulation was developed based on historical accounts from homer’s iliad along with additional physiological and environmental evidence to create an approximation of typical diet, activities, and maneuvers of the mycenaean military. the experiment found that the replicated dendra armor did not limit a warrior’s fighting ability or cause severe strain on the wearer. these results suggest that the dendra armor was battle worthy, implying that the mycenaean’s powerful impact in mediterranean history was due partly to their armor technology. to supplement these results, the authors developed a freely available software which enables simulation of combat conditions to test the hypothetical efficacy of the armor in more varied scenarios. “the armor that our volunteers wore was the same dimensions and similar weight to the bronze age original,” professor flouris said. “we also monitored calorie intake based on a ‘homeric diet’ (about 4,443 calories) derived from relevant descriptions found in the iliad, and calorie expenditure together with the stresses placed on the volunteers’ bodies under temperatures typical for a greek summer of 30 36 degrees celsius.” “when the 11 hour battle protocol began we measured heart rate, oxygen consumption, core temperature, fluid loss, and muscular function.” “we found that the armor allowed full flexibility of movement and did not exert excessive physiological stress on the body.” “this means that despite earlier views which classified it as only a ceremonial outfit, the armor could be worn for extended periods by fit individuals in battle.” “sixty years on from the discovery of the dendra armor we now understand, despite its cumbersome appearance at first sight, that it is not only flexible enough to permit almost every movement of a warrior on foot but also resilient enough to protect the wearer from most blows.” the results were publshied online in the journal plos one. _____ a.d. flouris et al. 2024. analysis of greek prehistoric combat in full body armour based on physiological principles: a series of studies using thematic analysis, human experiments, and numerical simulations. plos one 19 (5): e0301494; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301494

more than a dozen elite greek marines dressed up like bronze age warriors and practised ancient fighting techniques   all in the name of science. the 13 soldiers, all members of the hellenic armed forces, roleplayed as warriors from greece's late bronze age, known as the mycenaean civilization, in order to test the combat suitability of a 3,500 year old suit of armour. the study, published last week in the journal plos one, is being hailed by some experts for its innovative approach of mixing physiology, the study of how the human body works, with archeology, the study of ancient materials and remains. but they also questioned the historical accuracy of the simulated combat, and cautioned against using this one suit of armour to draw broad conclusions about the mycenaeans   people whose cultures and societies remain something of a mystery. at the heart of the study is a suit of mycenaean armour discovered in the southern greek village of dendra in 1960. made of copper alloy plating tied together with leather, and featuring a boar tusk helmet, it is one of the oldest complete suits of european armour in existence. but, given its weight and bulk, there's long been debate about its purpose. "the main question was: was that particular armour for ceremonial purposes, or was it also a battle tool?" university of thessaly physiologist yiannis koutedakis, one of the study's authors, told as it happens host nil köksal. "the verdict was that it could be used for both." to reach that conclusion, koutedakis and his colleagues created a replica of the dendra armour, then tested it on modern soldiers during a gruelling, 11 hour simulation of late bronze age combat. using descriptions of the legendary trojan war from homer's iliad as a guide, the soldiers fought, tossed javelins, ran on treadmills and carried out various combat movements. throughout, scientists monitored their blood sugar, heart rates, oxygen intake, core temperatures and more. the team also tried to mimic bronze age battle conditions by recruiting male volunteers of roughly the same age as ancient greek soldiers, controlling the temperature of the room where they performed combat simulations, and feeding the participants a traditional diet of meats, dry bread, goat cheese, olives and red wine. no coffee was allowed. "we measured the physical … impact that this armour had on the individuals, and we noticed that it was fine, not something extreme," koutedakis said. "it was heavy, but not too heavy. not unbearable." the findings back up earlier research by archaeologist barry molloy who, in a 2013 analysis, concluded the dendra armour was fit for extensive combat. molloy was unavailable for comment, but he told national geographic: "suits of armour like this would have transformed the battlefield." the study's authors write that their findings "support the notion that the mycenaeans had such a powerful impact in eastern mediterranean [society,] at least partly as a result of their armour technology." but dimitri nakassis, an archeologist at the university of colorado boulder who specializes mycenaean societies, cautioned that there's a lot we don't know about this period   including whether the mycenaeans were really the fierce warrior culture they were reputed to be. "i think most archaeologists would recognize [mycenaean is] kind of a shorthand," nakassis, who wasn't involved in the study, told cbc. "we don't know who these people were. we don't know what they called themselves. we don't know that they had a kind of unified identity." in order to be certain this style of armour gave mycenaeans an advantage on the battlefield, he says more evidence that it was in wide usage is needed. what's more, he says similar experiments are needed on other sets of armour from the same period. "they suggest ... maybe this gave the mycenaeans an edge, and i think that's a possibility that we should take seriously," nakassis said. "but, obviously, it requires more research." there were also limitations on the researchers' ability to perfectly replicate bronze age combat in a historically accurate way. ioannis georganas, an independent archeologist and member of the society of ancient military historians, noted that while dendra armour was 90 per cent copper and 10 per cent tin, the replica was 95 per cent copper and five per cent zinc. what's more, he said, in an email to cbc, basing the combat simulations on homer's epic poetry is "more than problematic." scholars have long debated what's fact and what's fiction in homer's tales. the trojan war was set centuries after the dendra armour was created, and some 500 years before homer was even born. in the study, the researchers acknowledged both of these shortcomings, noting they used the closest approximation of metals, and the most accurate descriptions of bronze age combat that they could get their hands on. they say these discrepancies don't call into question their key finding   that the dendra armour is practical, versatile, and combat ready. despite their caveats, both georganas and nakassis said they welcomed the study's unique approach to blending physiology with archeology, and said they hope to see more research like it. koutedakis agrees. "we have now coined a new term   archeo physiology," he said. "and i hope that ... other projects may be done in a similar way, and that will be very good." asked if he had a chance to try on the replica armour himself, koutedakis immediately replied: "of course i did!" "to have something on your body, which you knew that people were wearing 3,500 years ago," he said, "that feeling is really amazing." interview with yiannis koutedakis produced by arman aghbali add some “good” to your morning and evening. get the cbc radio newsletter. we'll send you a weekly roundup of the best cbc radio programming every friday. the next issue of radio one newsletter will soon be in your inbox.discover all cbc newsletters in the subscription centre. this site is protected by recaptcha and the google privacy policy and google terms of service apply. audience relations, cbc p.o. box 500 station a toronto, on canada, m5w 1e6 toll free (canada only): 1 866 306 4636 it is a priority for cbc to create products that are accessible to all in canada including people with visual, hearing, motor and cognitive challenges. closed captioning and described video is available for many cbc shows offered on cbc gem.

an official website of the united states government official websites use .gov a .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the united states. secure .gov websites use https a lock ( lock locked padlock icon ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. primary site navigation logged in as: competing interests: the authors have declared that no competing interests exist. * e mail: andreasflouris@gmail.com, aflouris@uth.gr received 2023 jun 19; accepted 2024 mar 18; collection date 2024. this is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. one of the oldest complete suits of european armour was discovered in 1960 near the village of dendra, in southern greece, but it remained unknown whether this armour was suitable for extended use in battle or was purely ceremonial. this had limited our understanding of the ancient greek late bronze age warfare and its consequences that have underpinned the social transformations of prehistoric europe and eastern mediterranean. in a series of archeo physiological studies, merging knowledge in archaeology, history, human physiology, and numerical simulation, we provide supporting evidence that the mycenaean armour found at dendra was entirely compatible with use in extended combat, and we provide a free software enabling simulation of late bronze age warfare. a group of special armed forces personnel wearing a replica of the dendra armour were able to complete an 11 hour simulated late bronze age combat protocol that we developed from a series of studies based on the available evidence. numerical simulation of the thermal exchanges in late bronze age warfare extended this conclusion across different environmental conditions and fighting intensities. our results support the notion that the mycenaeans had such a powerful impact in eastern mediterranean at least partly as a result of their armour technology. sixty years ago, a 3500 year old suit of bronze armour was discovered in a tomb near the village of dendra, a few km from ancient mycenae, in southern greece (fig 1) [1]. it is considered as one of the oldest complete suits of armour from the european bronze age (online supplement: sections 1.1 3). earlier experiments with replicas demonstrated its flexibility for use in combat but not its suitability for use in extended battle contexts [2 4]. was it purely ceremonial [5,6]? this limited our understanding of ancient warfare, particularly in the late bronze age, and its consequences which have underpinned the social transformations of the prehistoric world. the chamber tomb is characteristic of mycenaean civilization, consisting of an underground room with a long entrance corridor. the richly furnished tomb containing the warrior and his panoply was the smallest in a cemetery used for several centuries. an attempt by looters to rob the tomb early in 1960 was foiled, though not before some items had been removed. in the series of studies presented here, we have attempted to answer this research question and have provided supporting evidence to show that the armour discovered at dendra was, indeed, entirely compatible with use in combat. a group of special armed forces personnel wearing a replica of the armour were able to complete an 11 hour late bronze age combat simulation protocol, developed on the basis of analyses of the iliad. numerical simulation of the thermal exchanges in late bronze age warfare extended this conclusion across different environmental conditions and fighting intensities. to facilitate and promote research in this field, we developed a freely available software enabling simulation of the thermal exchanges in late bronze age warfare. as no historical accounts or descriptions survive from the greek late bronze age regarding the scope and use of armour of the dendra type, we turned to a key and only detailed early account of warfare, battle, and single combat: homer’s epic account of 10 days in the trojan war, the iliad. to suggest that homer’s epics were precise accounts of events which took place some five hundred years earlier, as schliemann did in the 1870s, would invite both censure and disbelief. to follow thucydides’ (i.2 12) approach that the traditions about the remote past of the greeks contain truth and suggest that they provide a reasonable basis for evaluating the nature of early warfare in greece is, we believe, a rational starting point. accordingly, three independent reviewers conducted a literature review and two in depth thematic analyses of homer’s iliad and the extracted information was combined with physiological and biometeorological knowledge to create a combat simulation protocol replicating the daily activities performed by elite warriors in the late bronze age. we hypothesised that the dendra armour was compatible with use in combat if two conditions were fulfilled when this protocol was applied: (1) that the physiological strain caused by the armour was tolerable and within normal levels, and (2) that the armour did not limit the fighting ability of the wearer. a step by step description of the rationale, methods, and results of this study is provided in an online supplement where all our results and data are freely available. the trojan war, as described in the iliad, was used as the archetype for late bronze age warfare (online supplement: sections 2.1 2.7). we extracted the information needed to create a late bronze age combat simulation protocol by performing two thematic analyses complemented by a literature review. the 1st thematic analysis (termed study 1) of the iliad addressed the following five warfare and battle tactics topics: (1) the characteristics of the physical environment in which battles took place, (2) the typical start and end time of daily army operations, (3) the typical activities performed by warriors during one day, (4) the typical food and water intake during a day of battle, and (5) the physical characteristics and the level of combat experience of most warriors. the following additional topics were addressed in the 2nd thematic analysis of the iliad (termed study 2): (6) the main types of combat, and (7) the typical techniques, movements, and weapons used by combatants. studies 1 and 2 included a careful study of the iliad performed independently by two reviewers who were either study investigators or had an extensive background in classical studies. to eliminate inter reviewer bias caused by interpretation of ancient greek, the thematic analyses were performed using the iliad translated into modern greek by prof. dimitrios n. maronitis [7], a well accepted translation that received the 2011 state award for interlanguage translation. notes addressing each topic were transcribed verbatim by a third investigator and were proofread by the original reviewer. thematic analysis of transcripts was conducted independently by three investigators (adf, sp, and pa). thereafter, each investigator reviewed the others’ results, and then they established the final themes by consensus. although homer provides a detailed description of the weapons and combat moves in his epics [8], it is still unclear whether the iliad provides a robust account of fighting tactics from the late mycenaean period as it is a palimpsest of contents created in different periods. this results in, for example, problematic descriptions of armour and tactics in some cases. we navigated this problem and resolved contradictions by complementing our thematic analyses with an extensive review of the scholarly literature (online supplement: sections 2.1 2.7). this ensured that the findings from the thematic analyses were in line with the best available evidence. for the literature review, we searched the google scholar and pubmed databases from their date of inception to january 2020 using search terms related to each of the above mentioned seven warfare and battle tactics topics. we included all types of peer reviewed papers, conference proceedings, and books. manuscript titles and abstracts were subsequently screened for relevance. thereafter, full texts (retrieved via the university of thessaly library) were screened independently by three reviewers (adf, sp, and pa). the results from the two thematic analyses of the iliad combined with the results from the review of the literature are summarised in the online supplement (section 2) and were used to create a late bronze age combat simulation protocol (section 3), while the data has been placed in an online data repository and are freely available [9]. we used the information from studies 1 2 (online supplement: sections 2.1 2.7) to conduct a human laboratory experiment where individuals underwent physiological measurements while performing the late bronze age combat simulation protocol (s5 table in s1 file). the study was performed in controlled environmental settings (online supplement: section 4.1 and s19 fig in s1 file) simulating the estimated ambient conditions (evaluated via a kestrel 5400fw meter, nielsen kellerman, pennsylvania, usa) of the fighting described in the iliad (online supplement: section 2.1), while participants wore a replica of the dendra armour and carried replicas of late bronze age weapons. strobe guidelines were applied in the reporting of the results from study 3. thirteen males (marines from the hellenic armed forces; age: 29.2 ± 7.9 years; height: 1.73 ± 0.05 m; 74.1 ± 6.8 kg weight) volunteered to participate in study 3. data collection started in march 2019 and was completed within two months. they were selected to fit as much as possible the age and anthropometric characteristics of the elite warriors described in the iliad (online supplement: section 2.5). prior to participating, they completed the physical activity readiness questionnaire to ensure that they presented with no health contraindications to performing extended strenuous physical exercise. they also read and signed an informed consent form approved by the institutional ethics review board which approved the study, as well as an informed consent to publish the information/images/photographs taken during the study in an online open access publication. the experimental protocol adhered to the declaration of helsinki and was approved by the bioethical committee at the school of exercise science of the university of thessaly (protocol number: 1098) as well as the hellenic army general staff (φ.300/74/449322   σ.2354 athens, oct. 19, 2017). the individuals appearing in figs 2 and 7, s6, s16, and s17 figs in s1 file in this manuscript have given written informed consent (as outlined in plos consent form) to publish these photographs. extensive familiarisation for all methods was undertaken prior to the study (online supplement: section 4.3) and all participants were free to cease their participation at any point before, during, or after the data collection and request that their data be removed. the map was created using azgaar’s fantasy map generator, a free web application, under a cc by license, with permission from max haniyeu, original copyright 2017 2021. bottom: volunteer marine soldiers in simulated combat wearing the dendra armour replica during the empirical study (right) and an artistic photo shoot (left). photo credit: andreas flouris and marija marković. permission required for reproduction. photo credit: andreas flouris and marija marković. permission required for reproduction. prior to undergoing any assessments, all participants were trained by the co author sbp, a military officer and licensed instructor in japanese fencing, martial arts, military combat tactics, and weapons (s6 fig in s1 file). this 2 day training in groups focused on familiarisation and correct application of late bronze age combat protection equipment and technology, correct and safe use of weaponry, as well as the different combinations of combat fighting techniques (close and middle range; s4 table in s1 file) of the late bronze age combat simulation protocol (s5 table in s1 file). when necessary, additional individual training sessions were held. all participants underwent enough training to be deemed qualified by the instructor for the unrestricted and safe use of the techniques, weapons, and armour used in the study. participants arrived at the laboratory for the main part of the investigation in the late afternoon (17:30 18:00) of the day prior to the day of testing. they were requested to abstain from caffeine since the morning of that day and they ate dinner (with ad libitum water) according to their weight adjusted nutrition plan (online supplement: section 2.4). participants were requested to retire to bed at 22:00 and were woken at 05:30 according to the procedures outlined in section 2 of the online supplement. at 06:00, they were provided with ad libitum water and a breakfast according to their weight adjusted nutrition plan (online supplement: section 2.4). at 06:30, volunteers were weighed and gave a urine sample to determine hydration status. thereafter, all sensors were placed, and a blood sample was taken at 06:55. the late bronze age combat simulation protocol (s5 table in s1 file) was initiated precisely at 07:00 and timing was followed very carefully throughout until its completion, at 17:54. during the various phases of the late bronze age combat simulation protocol, participants performed the combat move combinations outlined in s4 table in s1 file and were continually encouraged to exert maximal effort. during the breaks included in the combat simulation protocol, participants were allowed to consume ad libitum water as well as snacks according to their weight adjusted nutrition plan (online supplement: section 2.4). once the protocol was completed, participants gave another set of urine and blood samples. also, the following parameters were assessed before, at specific times during (s5 table in s1 file), and immediately after the combat simulation protocol: blood glucose concentration, blood lactate levels, hand grip strength, reaction time to visual and auditory stimuli, as well as self perceived rate of exhaustion, thermal comfort, and thermal sensation. heart rate, core body temperature, and mean skin temperature were continuously assessed throughout the combat protocol. the energy cost of each activity in the combat protocol was assessed via a portable gas analyser. for the latter measurement, we randomly evaluated specific parts of the combat simulation protocol for some participants to avoid interrupting the flow of combat and thus limiting the participants’ maximum effort. for the purposes of this study, we used a replica of the dendra armour (s9 fig in s1 file) made in birmingham, uk. [10], in 1984 by staff and students of the metal working department at the bournville college of art in birmingham under the direction of diana wardle (online supplement: section 4.5). the replica was made using gilding metal (95% copper, 5% zinc), which was the closest alloy to the original bronze available. each of the plates of the armour followed exactly the dimensions, curvature, and perforations of the original and was edged with leather strips and joined with leather thongs. the helmet plaques imitating the original boar’s tusk helmet were made from cast resin by h. buglass of the former department of ancient history and archaeology, university of birmingham, and the leather inner cap, as described by homer [11], was plaited by ken wardle. the total (armour and helmet) weight of the replica was 23.32 kg [measured with a precision weight scale (kern de 150k2d, kern & sohn gmbh, balingen, germany)], as opposed to the original which is estimated to weigh about 18 kg (missing one handguard, parts of greaves, and after 3500 years of oxidisation). the weight of each piece of the replica is provided in s9 fig in s1 file. recent tests of the efficacy of such armour have revealed that it offered considerable protection against most blows [5]. throughout the manuscript, we refer to the replica as the dendra armour. for the purposes of this study, we created a replica mycenaean cruciform sword (sandars type di) [12] of the type reported to have been found in the dendra tomb, which had blunt edges and point for safety reasons using methods and materials of the archaic period (online supplement: section 4.6 and s10 fig in s1 file). the sword was 0.85 m long with a weight of 1.2 kg (copper blade, wooden handle, copper ornamental nails and pins), being slightly heavier than the original. for the combat moves requiring spear throw or strike, we used a 2.2 m replica wooden (ashwood) spear with a copper head blunt edges and point for safety reasons (0.46 kg), similar to those described in the iliad. also, a medium sized stone (23 x 15 cm; 1.3 kg weight) was used in the “foot warrior vs chariot” encounters (s4 table in s1 file) and a composite recurve bow [13] was used to shoot an arrow at close range in the “chariot vs warrior on ship” encounter (s4 table in s1 file). to investigate whether the dendra armour was compatible with combat use for different environmental conditions (including e.g., solar exposure) and fighting intensities (i.e., metabolic rate), we developed a numerical model, henceforth called the late bronze age warrior model, simulating the thermoregulatory system of the elite late bronze age warrior wearing dendra type armour (online supplement: section 5). the late bronze age warrior model was developed starting from the tanabe 65 node model [14], to which we incorporated several modifications to account for phenomena that are key for the goal of this study. to provide a detailed account of the sun induced radiant exchanges of a virtual subject performing physical activity while wearing dendra like armour (instead of typical clothing considered in the tanabe 65 node model), we incorporated modifications to the model code describing more accurately the effects of the clothing/armour and the radiant exchanges on the body’s thermal exchanges with the environment. these modifications were implemented to develop the late bronze age warrior model and its predictions were compared, together with those obtained with the tanabe 65 node model, with results from several independent experimental studies (online supplement: section 5 and s16 fig in s1 file). an implementation of the late bronze age warrior model has been placed in an online data repository [15] and is freely available for research and educational purposes. our thematic analyses combined with published sedimentology and geomorphology data [16] suggest that the trojan war took place in a ~4 km2 area dominated by the scamander river plain, with meandering river levees and backswamps, and a coastline with irregular shaped bays and pervasive coastal marshes. the battleground morphology was characterised by flat ground with low hills of maximum 30 m altitude. by combining this data [16], the locations of morphology and historic features of the iliad deduced by luce [17], and the geographic indicators and distances provided by strabo [18], we used azgaar’s fantasy map generator, a free web application (under a cc by license, with permission from max haniyeu, original copyright 2017 2021), to create our interpretation of the geomorphologies in the area surrounding troy at the time of the events described in the iliad (fig 2). a video showing the map of homer’s troy and the surrounding area in 3d is available at https://youtu.be/jvq9ytt6yza. dating the trojan war was outside the scope of the present study, yet setting a hypothesized time period and season was needed to calibrate the environmental conditions for our experiments (temperature, day night cycle, etc.). our thematic analyses of the iliad suggested that the events described took place in the summertime. assigning a date for the trojan war is a complex challenge (see limitations section) which has been a subject of frequent discussion since antiquity. ancient authors have placed the trojan war within a long period between 1334 and 1129 bc [19 23], yet it is not clear whether later narratives are reliable evidence for dating the event [24,25]. considering this information, we hypothesised that the events described in the iliad took place in june during the later phases of the late bronze age. paleoclimate data using radiocarbon dating of stable oxygen and carbon isotopes in samples from the surrounding region [26] coupled with palaeoceanographic research using the regional marine sediment core [27 29] suggests that the average annual temperature in the troad during the later phases of the late bronze age was 18 20°c and the average annual relative humidity was 70 80%. assuming a monthly variability similar to that of the present (1980 2017) [30], we estimated a temperature of 24 29°c and a relative humidity of 70 85% in june. our thematic analyses indicated that armies moved out of encampment ~2.5 hours after sunrise and that fighting ended ~1.5 hours before sunset. the average sunrise and sunset times in the troad during june in the later phases of the late bronze age were 04:37 and 19:37, respectively (±10 minutes) [31]. based on these figures, we estimated that army operations started at ~07:00 and ended at ~18:00, which confirms previous analyses of homeric [32] and classical greek [33,34] warfare. we used these assumptions together with geographic indicators and distances provided by strabo [18], lithosome distributions and radiocarbon dating [16], estimates of marching speed of armies in classical greece [34,35], and day by day thematic analysis of the battles described in the iliad (s3 fig in s1 file) to estimate the duration (s1 table in s1 file), timing (s5 table in s1 file), and energy cost (s2 table in s1 file) of the activities performed by elite warriors, such as the one who had worn the dendra armour. assuming that late bronze age warriors consumed enough food to account for the energy requirements of the daily battle activities (estimated as 4,443 kcal; online supplement: section 2.4), we developed a nutrition plan (s3 table in s1 file) providing our soldiers with appropriate amounts of energy for the strenuous combat activities included in the late bronze age combat simulation protocol. our thematic analyses suggested that ~40% of homeric warriors’ daily caloric intake was provided by the morning breakfast, ~10% was consumed during fighting breaks throughout the day, and the remaining ~50% was provided by the evening dinner a distribution adopted in our study’s nutrition plan (online supplement: section 2.4). the food selection and preparation in our study were chosen to match the food available/consumed in the iliad [36 39], the homeric dietary and culinary practices [36 39], published biomolecular archaeology data of stable isotope analyses of human and faunal remains in the region [40], as well as archaeological data on food production and the consumption of stock farming animal species [41 43]. accordingly, breakfast was comprised primarily of dry bread, goat’s cheese, olives, and red wine. the small snacks consumed ad libitum during the day included dry bread, honey, goat’s cheese, and onions. finally, meat (sheep/goat/pig/cow) and red wine were the main components of the dinner at the day’s end, but bread and cheese were also included. homer describes the majority of warriors as strong, fast, and skilled mature men. also, many of the elite warriors are described as tall and physically impressive (online supplement: section 2.5). while it is logical to suspect that the physique of epic warriors was exaggerated and embellished in homer’s oral poetry, archaeological evidence [44 46] indicates that warriors were likely to be larger and stronger than the average population. skeletal remains from the late bronze age suggest that the mean height of the average greek male was 1.62 1.67 m [45,47], however that of the elite males buried in grave circle b at mycenae averaged 1.7 m [43], while the height of the wearer of the dendra armour was >1.77 m [1]. therefore, we selected for our study marines from the hellenic armed forces fitting these age (29.2±7.9 years) and anthropometric characteristics (1.73±0.05 m height; 74.1±6.8 kg mass). we analysed the iliad to design a combat protocol simulating the daily activities of elite warriors in the late bronze age. our thematic analyses revealed that the army was organised in different cooperating groups composed of leaders surrounded by their followers (online supplement: sections 2.3 and 2.6). leaders wore full, well made, and functional armour and were typically elite warriors with extensive battle experience. the majority of followers wore light or no armour and were capable warriors with varying levels of skill, training, and fighting experience. the groups constantly attacked, retreated, recovered, gained ground, and retreated again. at any given time during battle, a number of elite warriors with their followers fought at the front line as “foremost fighters”, while others (referred to as “multitude”) would seek safety at the rear of the battle line (online supplement: sections 2.3 and 2.6). in total, the homeric fighting activity was characterised by hit and run tactics [25,32,48], a form of physical effort described in physiology as “high intensity interval exercise” [49]. the identified hit and run tactics and high intensity interval exercises as well as a day by day thematic analysis of the battles described in the iliad (online supplement: section 2) were taken into consideration to design a late bronze age combat simulation protocol describing the activities undertaken by elite warriors during daily army operations which, as explained above, started at ~07:00 and ended at ~18:00. to develop this 11 hour combat simulation protocol, we used a two step cluster analysis of the combat moves described by homer to identify the typical number of moves, weapons used, phases (attack defence), and areas of the body targeted (s4 table in s1 file). the iliad includes 152 encounters (fig 3a), 78% of which being “one on one” combats (i.e., foot warrior vs foot warrior; fig 3b). a total of 264 combat moves are described in detail (fig 3c), of which 65% involved ranged weapons (where spears or even stones were thrown) and 35% involved fighting at close quarters combining different moves and weapons (fig 3d). eighty percent of the encounters ended within three combat moves and 53% ended in a single fatal move (s4 fig in s1 file). the chest, the head, and the upper limbs were the most commonly targeted areas of the body (s5 fig in s1 file). the developed late bronze age combat simulation protocol appears in s5 table in s1 file. the total (panel a) and daily (panel b) encounters described in the iliad as well as the combat moves used by warriors (panel c) across the different days described in the iliad (panel d). panels b and d are two level scatterplots with data points randomly distributed within each rectangle at the crossing of the horizontal and vertical axes. the colour of rectangles in the scatterplots indicates the frequency of data points included (darker shades indicate more data points). the study followed precisely the times, nutrition, movements, and combat tactics described above. all participants successfully completed the 11 hour late bronze age combat simulation protocol, with the majority developing reactive leucocytosis at levels typically observed following extreme stress and exercise due to the level of physiological strain endured (s6 table in s1 file) [50]. they also showed a high level of fatigue, sore upper body due to the weight of the armour, and foot pain due to walking, running, riding a chariot, and fighting barefoot. the “one on one” and “foot warrior vs chariot” encounters were the most intense activities, while “manoeuvring on chariot” and the “chariot vs chariot” encounters were the least intense (fig 4). core body (36.4 37.7°c) and mean skin (29.1 36.1°c) temperatures indicated minor hyperthermia, while heart rate (57 166 beats/min) suggested a moderate to high effort during simulated combat (up to ~80% of maximum heart rate; fig 5 and s11 fig in s1 file). for each activity, the top and bottom whiskers represent the maximum and minimum values, the top and bottom of the coloured rectangle represent the 3rd and 1st quartile, the lines represent the median, and the x marks represent the mean. the energy cost of various activities [51] is listed on the right side of the graph as reference. the effect size of the differences for all comparisons was large (d ≥ 0.8) except for between “1 on 1” and “foot warrior vs chariot”. the late bronze age combat simulation protocol incorporating the activities performed by elite warriors during one day described in the iliad (panel a) and the average heart rate (panel b) and core body temperature (panel c) of the volunteers undergoing this physical task. colours indicate the different stages of the combat protocol. the force generated by participants during combat hits was relatively high (3.5±0.9 kn; fig 6 and s12 fig in s1 file) and could inflict serious injury. previous studies have shown that fracture risk begins at any stroke with >2 kn impact force [52] (i.e., >99% of hits in our study), while hits between 3.3 [53] and 4.8 [54] kn (i.e., >89% of hits in our study) lead to severe fractures. there was a moderate decline in blood glucose levels across time (r =  0.234, p = 0.017), from an average of 105.5±14.0 mg/dl in the morning to 89.4±9.0 mg/dl at the end of the 11 hour combat simulation protocol (s13 fig in s1 file). the iliad based nutrition plan provided enough energy to complete the combat simulation protocol, since hypoglycemia (< 70 mg/dl blood glucose) at the day’s end was only observed in one of the 13 volunteers. measurements of hand grip strength, reaction time to visual and aural stimuli, hydration levels (via urine specific gravity), blood lactate, interleukin 6 and 10, as well as tumour necrosis factor alpha showed no significant changes throughout the protocol (p>0.05; online supplement: section 4.8, s13 fig and s6 table in s1 file). taken together, these experimental results indicate that the dendra armour was compatible with use in the type of combat described by homer in the iliad. characteristics of the resultant force generated (graph a) and the deviation from the target centre (graph b) during hits across the different encounter types. shaded areas represent standard deviation. note: a = different from foot warrior vs chariot (p < 0.05); b = different from 1 on 1 (p < 0.05); c = different from chariot vs chariot (p < 0.05); d = different from chariot vs warrior on ship (p < 0.05). following the end of data collection, a photo shoot was organised for the purpose of creating a documentary visual account of the measurements (fig 7 and s14 and s15 figs in s1 file). in this case, the sensors and measuring equipment were removed as the primary focus was on the warrior, the armour, the weapons, the body postures and the combat moves. our modelling work (online supplement: section 5) started from the tanabe 65 node model that predicts the body temperature of virtual individuals and their heat/mass exchanges with the surrounding environment [14]. we then implemented several modifications to strengthen the model accuracy regarding phenomena that were key for this study, including (1) the effects of the armour on the body thermal exchanges with the environment, (2) the calculation of the long wave radiation exchanges, (3) the effect of solar loads varying with the sun position in the sky, and (4) the energy lost by work during intense activities (important for high metabolic rate activities). the developed late bronze age warrior model has been incorporated into a freely available software placed in an online data repository and its validity was confirmed as the predicted core body temperatures were found to be within 0.1 0.2°c of that in the above mentioned human experiment (s23 fig in s1 file). we then considered seven simulation cases (s11 table in s1 file) to investigate how different combinations of air temperature, wind, solar exposure, fighting intensity, and use of a white surcoat over the armour impacted the core body temperature of the warrior as well as his heat/mass exchanges with the surrounding environment. our underlying premise was that the warrior would stop fighting if his core body temperature surpassed 38.5°c a conservative threshold as modern athletes often surpass that level without harm [55]. we found that all but one of the tested conditions would allow the warrior to continue fighting for the entire 11 hour combat simulation protocol (s24 fig in s1 file). in the remaining test condition an improbable case with unrealistically low wind speed, high temperature, and a very high fighting intensity the warrior would be forced to stop fighting after 7.5 hours into battle. as a whole, the numerical analysis indicated that the dendra armour was compatible with combat use for different environmental conditions and fighting intensities. despite our best intentions and extensive efforts, our four studies have limitations that should be considered when evaluating their results. due to these limitations, our findings must be supplemented with historical analysis and theoretical modelling to gain a more comprehensive understanding of late bronze age warfare. first, the iliad is undoubtedly the most appropriate text to use for developing a late bronze age combat simulation protocol [8,25]. however, it is not clear whether it provides a robust account of fighting tactics from the late mycenaean period, as it is a palimpsest of contents created in different periods and can lead, for example, to misinterpretation or oversimplification of complex military practices. therefore, we complemented our thematic analyses with an extensive review of the scholarly literature to ensure that our findings were in line with the best available evidence. our hypothetical date for the trojan war (1300 1200 bc) was needed to enable estimates of the environmental conditions (temperature, day night cycle, etc.) but should not be considered as a contribution to the continuing discussions about the date of the war. moreover, the trojan war cannot be taken as a historical event, at least in the form described in the homeric epics [24]. there is no way to know whether it reflects a single event or a period of turmoil that was triggered during an alleged migration from greece to the eastern aegean, a narrative that has been also put into question [19,24,56]. another important issue is the accuracy of the replicas of armour and weapons. even slight variations in weight, balance, material, and craftsmanship can lead to different outcomes or misinterpretations of how these items were used in warfare. we carefully studied the dendra armour (online supplement: section 4.5) as well as the weapons used by mycenaeans (online supplement: section 4.6) and spent extensive efforts into building replicas that were as similar as possible to originals. however, it is important to acknowledge that some aspects of ancient warfare technology may be impossible to fully recreate or to understand them using modern replicas and experiments. the physical condition of the participants in our human experiment is also an important factor to consider. we recruited marines from the hellenic armed forces who fit as much as possible the age and anthropometric characteristics of the elite warriors described in the iliad (online supplement: section 2.5). however, modern humans differ in physical condition, training, and endurance from ancient warriors. this difference may have affected the outcomes of our experiments, but this effect would further reinforce our findings as ancient warriors were likely more accustomed to the physical demands of their armour and weapons. nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge that our marines were a limited number, which may not represent the diversity of individuals involved in ancient warfare, and they lacked the combat experience and tactical knowledge of late bronze age warriors. this gap can influence how weapons and armour were used in our study. ensuring the safety of our participants was paramount, which means that full scale, realistic combat scenarios could not be replicated accurately. while ethical considerations prevented us from replicating the true dangers and injuries of ancient warfare, we addressed a number of these issues by supplementing our experiments with the numerical simulation study, developing the late bronze age warrior model. finally, although we gathered extensive evidence on the environmental conditions during the later phases of the late bronze age and we further extended our investigations using numerical simulations, the specific environmental conditions (terrain, weather, etc.) of the ancient battlefield is challenging to replicate in a controlled laboratory setting. all these limitations, however, with the exception of the improbable scenario 6, indicate that our conclusions about the utility of the dendra armour err on the side of caution not optimism. if anything, it was even more practical in combat contexts than we have been able to demonstrate. the discovery of the dendra panoply in 1960 immediately raised the issue of its function. could it have been worn in battle [13] as repeatedly demonstrated by the exploits of the warriors in the iliad? was its use restricted to those who rode to battle in chariots? [57] again, a regular practice in the epic and indicated in the linear b archives by the association of armour and chariots. or was it too cumbersome to be worn except on ceremonial occasions [2 4], as stated, for example, in the caption to the pieces of armour from thebes on display in the archaeological museum of thebes? only experiment bound by strict criteria and content with a replica could answer these questions since the metal of the panoply itself is too fragile for use. the series of archeo physiological studies described here, merging knowledge in archaeology, history, human physiology, and numerical simulation, provide support for our conclusion that the mycenaean armour found at dendra was suitable for extended use in battle. the dendra armour changed our understanding of the ancient world in two important respects. first, it had long been known that early greek warriors, the mycenaeans, were well supplied with weapons but no armour had been found until that moment [58]. second, it disproved the popular assertion that the references to bronze armour in homer’s iliad were later interpolations so that his epic heroes would resemble the typical armour wearing ‘hoplite soldiers’ of archaic and classical greece [59]. the military aspects of mycenaean society have long been evident from the massive fortifications which have never been lost from view [60] and from the burials of a warrior elite first revealed by schliemann’s excavations at mycenae itself [61]. swords, spears, and the plates from boar’s tusk helmets are regular finds in tomb contexts and frequently illustrated in wall paintings and on seal stones. shields and chariots are often illustrated but leave little trace in other aspects of the archaeological record. body armour, as worn by homer’s warriors of the heroic age, was long regarded as poetic licence or even later interpolation (online supplement: sections 1.1 3). the sketches of armour on the linear b tablets (s2 fig in s1 file), first found at knossos and later at pylos, remained enigmatic. were they really armour and, if so, was it the linen armour known to classical scholars as linothorax? ventris’ decipherment of the script on the tablets and demonstration that it represented an early form of greek hinted at the existence of bronze armour [62], but most scholars dismissed the possibility until the discovery of the dendra armour. even the identification of another dozen or so examples at different sites in crete and mainland greece (s1 fig in s1 file) did not convince that it was either practical or common. the lists of numerous examples from the room of the chariot tablets at knossos were dismissed by the greatest authorities [63]. it seemed inconceivable that there could be so many purely ceremonial suits of bronze armour. sixty years on from the discovery of the dendra armour, we now recognise that the records represent equipment provided to elite warriors by the palatial centres. sixty years on we now understand, despite its cumbersome appearance at first sight, that it is not only flexible enough to permit almost every movement of a warrior on foot but also resilient enough to protect the wearer from most blows [4,5]. in addition, our experiments have now demonstrated, we hope convincingly, that the armour is also of a weight and structure to permit extended use in combat, day after day, for up to 11 hours, without detriment to a fit warrior (although, apart from the iliad, we have no accounts of battles of such duration). the linear b tablets, with their records of repair and refurbishment as well as of issue to individual warriors, are surely the clearest evidence that the palatial centres maintained and equipped substantial fighting forces on stand by, presumably, against time of need. the surviving knossos record, which can only be partial because of the chance preservation of the tablets, indicates between 450 and 600 well equipped individuals with both armour and chariots [64]. the resources committed to equipping such an ‘army’ (as well as those on the greek mainland devoted to constructing vast fortifications) show that defence against foes unknown to us was among the most pressing concerns of the palatial authorities (whether or not we think of a minos or an agamemnon as leader) (online supplement: sections 1.1 3). did they also have aggression in mind the expansion of their territory? according to hittite records, the ahhiyawa whom we recognise as mycenaeans had a sufficient presence in western asia minor in the second half of the 2nd millennium bc to have both campaigned against the hittites and later to become reconciled. at one point they were at war over ‘wilusa’ in the north west corner of asia minor and there are strong linguistic arguments for equating wilusa with greek ilion = troy. at another moment, there are references by the hittite king to the king of the ahhiyawa as ‘my brother’. it is clear from both the literary and the archaeological evidence that millawanda = miletus was for some time a mycenaean stronghold [65,66]. given that the hittite kingdom dominated most of anatolia and, at times, the northern parts of syria and mesopotamia [67], we must understand that only a significant military force could oppose them or gain such respect as recorded in the hittite archives. we may reasonably ask whether the possession of full armour, as represented by the dendra panoply, was perhaps the principal factor in gaining this respect. as far as we know, the hittite warriors did not have an equivalent. another of the puzzles presented by the linear b records is the chariots recorded on the same tablets as the armour (online supplement: sections 1.2 3, s2 fig in s1 file). most experts regard the terrain of greece, with a very few exceptions, as totally unsuitable for the use of battle chariots. although there are regular representations of chariots used in processions and a few in combat scenes, the numbers indicate a highly mobile force of armour clad warriors. where might these be deployed? homer is familiar with the use of chariots to bring armoured warriors into battle, but they do not seem to be part of later hoplite warfare. may we assume this is a genuine memory of bronze age practice? in the near east chariot warfare had a long tradition [68]. at the battle of kadesh in c 1274 bc, for example, both the egyptians and the hittites fielded 2000 or more chariots according to documentary evidence [69]. in later periods greeks were much in demand as ‘mercenaries’ in egypt (herodotus histories 2.152) and the persian empire (xenophon anabasis). could this be an explanation for the presence of the image of a boar’s tusk helmet on a scrap of 14th century bc egyptian papyrus [70]? might we perhaps think of the knossos records as the response to a request for the services of a formidable ‘battle group’ by one of the eastern mediterranean powers services for which the palace authorities would be well reimbursed? many questions remain unanswered, although today it is recognised that ‘diplomatic’ relations across the eastern mediterranean included mycenaean territory [71]. the evidence presented here that mycenaean armour was suitable for extended use in battle enriches both our understanding of ancient greek and late bronze age warfare and the potential contexts in which it took place. it supplies a robust scaffold to support fresh research regarding the events that have underpinned social transformations in both prehistoric europe and the eastern mediterranean. our results sustain the notion that the mycenaeans had a powerful impact in the eastern mediterranean (as confirmed in hittite and egyptian documents) [65,66,70] due, at least in part, to their armour technology. this may also help shed much needed light on one of history’s most frightful turning points: the collapse of the eastern mediterranean bronze age civilisations towards the end of the 2nd millennium bc; a time of destruction and upheaval that marked the beginning of the age of iron. (zip) we are indebted to dimitrios flouris and michael tzekakis for their advice and technical assistance during the thematic analyses of the iliad. we wish to thank dr marija marković and mr stelios tsitimis for coordinating and executing the artistic photo shoot of the dendra armour. we also thank minos koutedakis for his insightful suggestions during the design of the human experiment. we record with great sadness the recent death of diana wardle whose chance dinner table conversation with y.k. inspired our interdisciplinary project. in pace requiesce. all data from this study has been made freely available and step by step description of the rationale, methods, and results of this study is provided in an online supplement. a video showing the map of homer’s troy and the surrounding area in 3d can be freely viewed online (https://youtu.be/jvq9ytt6yza) and has also been placed in an online data repository (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12961463.v1). the map was created using azgaar's fantasy map generator, a free web application, under a cc by license, with permission from max haniyeu, original copyright 2017 2021. the data derived from the iliad thematic analysis has been made freely available in an online data repository (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12961499.v1). finally, an implementation of the late bronze age warrior model has been placed in an online data repository and is freely available for research and educational purposes (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12090831.v1). the authors received no specific funding for this work. this is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 5 sep 2023 pone d 23 17949analysis of prehistoric combat in full body armour based on physiological principles: a series of studies using thematic analyses, a cross sectional human trial, and numerical simulationsplos one dear dr. flouris, thank you for submitting your manuscript to plos one. after careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet plos one’s publication criteria as it currently stands. therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. the attached reviews provide several important observations and questions. in light of these reviews, the manuscript needs some revision. please consider the comments of both reviewer 1 and 2 while revising your manuscript. furthermore, apart from deleting the last sentence of your paper ("…and set the origins of western civilization…"), as noted by one of the reviewers, i further recommend to delete the sentence “eratosthenes provided…13th century bc” (lines 220 224). later narratives cannot be taken as reliable evidence for the dating of the trojan war. the trojan war cannot be taken as a historical event, at least in the form described in the homeric epics. there is quite a long list of literature on the historicity of the trojan war and the historical implications of early greek poetry. there is also no way to know if it reflects a single event or a turmoil period that was triggered during an alleged migration from greece to the eastern aegean, a narrative that has been also put into question. additionally, i recommend to avoid dating the event in the 13th (throughout the paper) or any other century and replace that with relative dates (e.g. in the later phases of the late bronze age, etc.). the above mentioned flaws undermine the paper‘s value. it is not clear how information provided by strabo can contribute to the reconstruction of the trojan landscape during the late bronze age period (lines 214, 238). please explain or rephrase the sentence. it is advisable to avoid “accurate” in any description of replicas (lines 299 300). please explain why you use methods of the archaic period to reconstruct a late bronze age sword (line 182). additionally, there were no cooper but bronze weapons as one of the reviewers already noticed. this does not certainly affect the   indeed innovative   results of your study but you have to comment on that. please remove the photo from page 8. you can either include it in the figures cited in the text or delete it. my suggestion would be to include more photos from the experimental study in the text (as you do in the supporting information document). i finally suggest that you include more recent literature on early aegean warfare (see, e.g., heckel et al. a companion to greek warfare, 2021, with further literature). please submit your revised manuscript by oct 20 2023 11:59pm. if you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. when you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'submissions needing revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript: a rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). you should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'response to reviewers'. a marked up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. you should upload this as a separate file labeled 'revised manuscript with track changes'. an unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. you should upload this as a separate file labeled 'manuscript'. if you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. if applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (doi) so that it can be cited independently in the future. for instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission guidelines#loc laboratory protocols. additionally, plos one offers an option for publishing peer reviewed lab protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. we look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. kind regards, stefanos gimatzidis, ph.d. academic editor plos one journal requirements: when submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. please ensure that your manuscript meets plos one's style requirements, including those for file naming. the plos one style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjvg/plosone_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/plosone_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf 2. we note that figures 1 and s9 in your submission contain copyrighted images. all plos content is published under the creative commons attribution license (cc by 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and supporting information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. for more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses and copyright. we require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the cc by 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission: a. you may seek permission from the original copyright holder of figures 1 and s9 to publish the content specifically under the cc by 4.0 license. we recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the content permission form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content permission form.pdf) and the following text: “i request permission for the open access journal plos one to publish xxx under the creative commons attribution license (ccal) cc by 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish xxx under a cc by license and complete the attached form.” please upload the completed content permission form or other proof of granted permissions as an ""other"" file with your submission. in the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “reprinted from [ref] under a cc by license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].” b. if you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the cc by 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the cc by 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the cc by 4.0 license. please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. if applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only. 3. we note that figures 2 and s7 in your submission contain map/satellite images which may be copyrighted. all plos content is published under the creative commons attribution license (cc by 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and supporting information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. for these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as google software (google maps, street view, and earth). for more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses and copyright. we require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the cc by 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission: a. you may seek permission from the original copyright holder of figures 2 and s7to publish the content specifically under the cc by 4.0 license. we recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the content permission form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content permission form.pdf) and the following text: “i request permission for the open access journal plos one to publish xxx under the creative commons attribution license (ccal) cc by 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish xxx under a cc by license and complete the attached form.” please upload the completed content permission form or other proof of granted permissions as an ""other"" file with your submission. in the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “reprinted from [ref] under a cc by license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].” b. if you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the cc by 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the cc by 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the cc by 4.0 license. please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. if applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only. the following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful: usgs national map viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/ the gateway to astronaut photography of earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/ maps at the cia (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the world factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia maps publications/index.html nasa earth observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/ landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/ usgs eros (earth resources observatory and science (eros) center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/# natural earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/ 4. please include captions for your supporting information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in text citations to match accordingly. please see our supporting information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting information. 5. we note that figures 3, s4 and s 17 includes an image of a participant in the study. as per the plos one policy (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission guidelines#loc human subjects research) on papers that include identifying, or potentially identifying, information, the individual(s) or parent(s)/guardian(s) must be informed of the terms of the plos open access (cc by) license and provide specific permission for publication of these details under the terms of this license. please download the consent form for publication in a plos journal (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=8ce6/plos consent form english.pdf). the signed consent form should not be submitted with the manuscript, but should be securely filed in the individual's case notes. please amend the methods section and ethics statement of the manuscript to explicitly state that the patient/participant has provided consent for publication: “the individual in this manuscript has given written informed consent (as outlined in plos consent form) to publish these case details”. if you are unable to obtain consent from the subject of the photograph, you will need to remove the figure and any other textual identifying information or case descriptions for this individual. 6. please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. if you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. if you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the references list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. [note: html markup is below. please do not edit.] reviewers' comments: reviewer's responses to questions comments to the author 1. is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? the manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. the conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. reviewer #1: yes reviewer #2: yes ********** 2. has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? reviewer #1: yes reviewer #2: yes ********** 3. have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? the plos data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the data availability statement in the manuscript pdf file). the data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. for example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. if there are restrictions on publicly sharing data e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party those must be specified. reviewer #1: yes reviewer #2: yes ********** 4. is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard english? plos one does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. reviewer #1: yes reviewer #2: yes ********** 5. review comments to the author please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. you may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) reviewer #1: this is the third time i have written this on this form. the previous attempts seems not to have recorded by your system. this is an interesting and important study. previous interpretations of the dendra corselet have been speculative and devoid of any real analysis. therefore the literature about the dendra armour has tended to be full of "truisms". the main "truism" is that the dendra armour is essentially ceremonial and could not have been used practically. the author of this article sets out to demonstrate this is not so. using a series of practical scientific experiments he establishes that the dendra armour is practical and could have worn in actual combat. this is the primary aim of the project, and is discussed at the beginning of the article. the methodology for the project is described as a series of practical experiments wherein an accurate replica of the armour is worn by a group of volunteers (fit young men from the greek army), and they undertook physical actions appropriate to combat. they were then subjected to a series of the tests to establish their physiological response to the stresses of the actions. in the article the tests are described fully and the results presented (additional detail is also provided through links to online databases). consequently the primary of aim of the project is proved: that the dendra armour could be used practically in combat and did not impeded the warrior's mobility or combat effectiveness. that said: the article as presented is essentially quantitative in its discussion. this is one of its strengths. it is written seemingly for a scientifically minded audience, with appropriate "hard" evidence. the author however, in part of the online material includes a supplementary discussion of the project which is primarily qualitative in form and style. it is therefore more accessible to those of us with less scientific minds. it manages to address the sorts of questions which might occur to archaeologists and scholars of ancient combat. it also elaborates more on the interpretative implications of the study. therefore i strongly urge the author to consider incorporating some of the discussion from the qualitative version into the quantitative. or he could design the qualitative version to stand as a part 2. it will definitely have a wider accessibility. i am happy to recommend publication of this article. reviewer #2: i congratulate the authors on a most original, thorough, and thought provoking piece of research, which adds significantly to our knowledge and understanding of mycenaean combat tactics. the research conclusively demonstrates that the dendra armour was a functional, and probably much used, piece of defensive kit. what's more, the article and supplementary materials are written in a fluent and sophisticated language that does not require any further editing. i warmly recommend publishing the manuscript once the authors have carried out the minor corrections recommended below:   line 78ff. the authors give the impression that the iliad provides a coherent account of fighting tactics from the late mycenaean period. as i'm sure they are aware, the iliad is palimpsest of contents created in different periods, as shown in particular by mismatching or otherwise problematic descriptions of weapons, armour and tactics (e.g., the well known example of chariots being used in the iliad as 'battlefield taxis'). they should discuss, in at least a paragraph, how they navigated the problem and resolved the many contradictions posed by the text.   line 181. it's not clear why the replica sword was manufactured from pure copper considering that late mycenaean swords were made of tin bronze. this should be corrected or explained.   line 383: i strongly recommend that the problematic closing "and set the origins of western civilization" is deleted. the article closes rather well, and in fact better, with "the beginning of the age of iron". ********** 6. plos authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). if published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. if you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? for information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our privacy policy. reviewer #1: yes: alan a.d. peatfield reviewer #2: yes: andrea dolfini ********** [note: if reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "view attachments". if this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] while revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the preflight analysis and conversion engine (pace) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. pace helps ensure that figures meet plos requirements. to use pace, you must first register as a user. registration is free. then, login and navigate to the upload tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. if you encounter any issues or have any questions when using pace, please email plos at figures@plos.org. please note that supporting information files do not need this step. collection date 2024. 3 mar 2024 please, see the submitted document. submitted filename: response to reviewers.docx this is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 18 mar 2024 analysis of greek prehistoric combat in full body armour based on physiological principles: a series of studies using thematic analysis, human experiments, and numerical simulations pone d 23 17949r1 dear dr. flouris, we’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. within one week, you’ll receive an e mail detailing the required amendments. when these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. an invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with plos and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. please make sure your user information is up to date by logging into editorial manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and clicking the ‘update my information' link at the top of the page. if you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our author billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. if your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. if they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible    no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm eastern time on the date of publication. for more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. kind regards, stefanos gimatzidis, ph.d. academic editor plos one additional editor comments (optional): reviewers' comments: this is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 30 apr 2024 pone d 23 17949r1 plos one dear dr. flouris, i'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in plos one. congratulations! your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team. at this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. this includes ensuring the following: * all references, tables, and figures are properly cited * all relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission, * there are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset if revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. if no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. at this time, we do not offer pre publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps. lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. if they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm eastern time on the date of publication. for more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. if we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org. thank you for submitting your work to plos one and supporting open access. kind regards, plos one editorial office staff on behalf of dr. stefanos gimatzidis academic editor plos one this section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article. (zip) submitted filename: response to reviewers.docx all data from this study has been made freely available and step by step description of the rationale, methods, and results of this study is provided in an online supplement. a video showing the map of homer’s troy and the surrounding area in 3d can be freely viewed online (https://youtu.be/jvq9ytt6yza) and has also been placed in an online data repository (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12961463.v1). the map was created using azgaar's fantasy map generator, a free web application, under a cc by license, with permission from max haniyeu, original copyright 2017 2021. the data derived from the iliad thematic analysis has been made freely available in an online data repository (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12961499.v1). finally, an implementation of the late bronze age warrior model has been placed in an online data repository and is freely available for research and educational purposes (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12090831.v1). articles from plos one are provided here courtesy of plos connect with nlm national library of medicine 8600 rockville pike bethesda, md 20894

an ancient mystery may have been solved after researchers, with the help of 13 hellenic marines, proved that a unique 3,500 year old suit of greek armor wasn't necessarily just for show, but could have been used for combat at the time of the trojan war. in may 1960, the site of a botched tomb robbery near the village of dendra in southern greece sparked a mystery worthy of indiana jones. the thieves got away with very little, but their attempted heist uncovered the tomb of a warrior with his belongings stacked in one corner of the funerary chamber. it's not unusual to find arms and armor in warrior tombs, but this one was off the charts for oddness. among the deceased's belongings was a suit of armor called a panoply that has no known counterpart in history. it consists of an elaborate bronze cuirass made up of a front and back plate. hanging from this was a neck guard called a gorget, two shoulder guards or pauldrons with overlapping plates to protect the arms, and three curved bottom plates or taces back and front to protect the lower trunk. it was all the product of remarkable workmanship, which is an understatement if ever there was one because there wouldn't be anything similar until the time of france's king louis xiv over 3,000 years later. in other words, the dendra panoply was a classic example of a lost art that died with the mycenaean age after the fall of troy. ever since its discovery, the question has remained: what was this armor for? was it for battle or was it some sort of parade armor only worn for ceremonial occasions? to find the answer, a team of researchers, some from the university of thessaly, engaged in a series of four studies that bear a striking resemblance to a research proposal i tried to get off the ground in the 1980s during my archaeologist days. i was curious about ancient and medieval armor and sword combat and i wanted to study them and how they were used from an engineering point of view. unfortunately, i had to give up the project because it was almost impossible to get my hands on replica swords and other items of sufficient quality without spending a fortune on something that would be highly unlikely to find funding. today, you could probably arrange to buy some quite reasonably at the nearest renaissance festival. forty years too late. go figure. the new series of studies involved creating functional copies of the dendra panoply, as well as helmets and suitable blunted swords and spears, then kitting out 13 hellenic marines selected for their fitness and their ethnic and physical matching of ancient greek warriors based on historic and archaeological evidence. they were then kitted with biosensors and completed an 11 hour simulation of an ancient greek combat patrol. the researchers also recreated the mycenaean diet for the men (sorry, no caffeine) and ancient greek fighting techniques based on the writings of the poet homer in his classic the iliad, which recounts the battle for the city of troy. while the team acknowledged that no one knew exactly when the trojan wars were fought and that homer wasn't entirely reliable (he was, after all, blind, writing to entertain, and his works were probably somewhat altered over the centuries), he did provide accounts of ancient warriors that were of a workable level of accuracy. in addition, the team took into account the climate and terrain of the trojan wars and created a digital simulation that would allow them to evaluate combat under a variety of conditions. what the researchers were looking for was evidence that someone under realistic conditions could carry out sustained combat in the dendra armor. what they found was that the volunteers could march and fight in hit and run maneuvers typical of the time on foot or with chariots with no more stress than a fit man of an average of 29 years could be expected to suffer and that the armor allowed for a practical level of mobility and protection. not only that, but the development of such armor in the late bronze age in europe could explain the rise of ancient greek culture and influence in the region. "our results support the notion that the mycenaeans had such a powerful impact in the eastern mediterranean at least partly as a result of their armor technology," said physiologist and team member andreas flouris of the university of thessaly. source: plos one

discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high quality journal. plos one promises fair, rigorous peer review, broad scope, and wide readership   a perfect fit for your research every time. learn more submit now click through the plos taxonomy to find articles in your field. for more information about plos subject areas, click here. loading metrics open access peer reviewed research article roles conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, validation, visualization, writing   original draft, writing   review & editing * e mail: andreasflouris@gmail.com, aflouris@uth.gr affiliation department of exercise science, fame laboratory, university of thessaly, volos, greece https://orcid.org/0000 0002 9823 3915 roles data curation, investigation, methodology, project administration, writing   review & editing affiliation department of exercise science, fame laboratory, university of thessaly, volos, greece roles data curation, investigation, methodology, writing   review & editing affiliation department of exercise science, fame laboratory, university of thessaly, volos, greece https://orcid.org/0009 0005 4258 1573 roles data curation, formal analysis, methodology, software, validation, visualization, writing   review & editing affiliations engineering faculty, transport phenomena research centre (ceft), porto university, rua dr. roberto frias, porto, portugal, engineering faculty, associate laboratory in chemical engineering (alice), porto university, rua dr. roberto frias, porto, portugal https://orcid.org/0000 0002 2836 1057 roles conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, software, writing   review & editing affiliations engineering faculty, transport phenomena research centre (ceft), porto university, rua dr. roberto frias, porto, portugal, engineering faculty, associate laboratory in chemical engineering (alice), porto university, rua dr. roberto frias, porto, portugal roles methodology, validation, writing   review & editing affiliation school of exercise science, university of thessaly, volos, greece roles methodology, project administration, writing   review & editing affiliation school of exercise science, university of thessaly, volos, greece roles conceptualization, methodology, writing   review & editing affiliations school of exercise science, university of thessaly, volos, greece, faculty of education, research centre for sport, exercise and performance, health and wellbeing, university of wolverhampton, wolverhampton, united kingdom https://orcid.org/0000 0002 7065 9447 roles conceptualization, investigation, methodology, validation, writing   original draft, writing   review & editing affiliation department of classics, ancient history and archaeology, university of birmingham, birmingham, united kingdom roles conceptualization, methodology, validation, visualization, writing   review & editing affiliation department of classics, ancient history and archaeology, university of birmingham, birmingham, united kingdom one of the oldest complete suits of european armour was discovered in 1960 near the village of dendra, in southern greece, but it remained unknown whether this armour was suitable for extended use in battle or was purely ceremonial. this had limited our understanding of the ancient greek late bronze age warfare and its consequences that have underpinned the social transformations of prehistoric europe and eastern mediterranean. in a series of archeo physiological studies, merging knowledge in archaeology, history, human physiology, and numerical simulation, we provide supporting evidence that the mycenaean armour found at dendra was entirely compatible with use in extended combat, and we provide a free software enabling simulation of late bronze age warfare. a group of special armed forces personnel wearing a replica of the dendra armour were able to complete an 11 hour simulated late bronze age combat protocol that we developed from a series of studies based on the available evidence. numerical simulation of the thermal exchanges in late bronze age warfare extended this conclusion across different environmental conditions and fighting intensities. our results support the notion that the mycenaeans had such a powerful impact in eastern mediterranean at least partly as a result of their armour technology. citation: flouris ad, petmezas sb, asimoglou pi, vale jp, mayor ts, giakas g, et al. (2024) analysis of greek prehistoric combat in full body armour based on physiological principles: a series of studies using thematic analysis, human experiments, and numerical simulations. plos one 19(5): e0301494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301494 editor: stefanos gimatzidis, austrian academy of sciences, austria received: june 19, 2023; accepted: march 18, 2024; published: may 22, 2024 copyright: © 2024 flouris et al. this is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. data availability: all data from this study has been made freely available and step by step description of the rationale, methods, and results of this study is provided in an online supplement. a video showing the map of homer’s troy and the surrounding area in 3d can be freely viewed online (https://youtu.be/jvq9ytt6yza) and has also been placed in an online data repository (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12961463.v1). the map was created using azgaar's fantasy map generator, a free web application, under a cc by license, with permission from max haniyeu, original copyright 2017 2021. the data derived from the iliad thematic analysis has been made freely available in an online data repository (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12961499.v1). finally, an implementation of the late bronze age warrior model has been placed in an online data repository and is freely available for research and educational purposes (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12090831.v1). funding: the authors received no specific funding for this work. competing interests: the authors have declared that no competing interests exist. sixty years ago, a 3500 year old suit of bronze armour was discovered in a tomb near the village of dendra, a few km from ancient mycenae, in southern greece (fig 1) [1]. it is considered as one of the oldest complete suits of armour from the european bronze age (online supplement: sections 1.1 3). earlier experiments with replicas demonstrated its flexibility for use in combat but not its suitability for use in extended battle contexts [2 4]. was it purely ceremonial [5,6]? this limited our understanding of ancient warfare, particularly in the late bronze age, and its consequences which have underpinned the social transformations of the prehistoric world. the chamber tomb is characteristic of mycenaean civilization, consisting of an underground room with a long entrance corridor. the richly furnished tomb containing the warrior and his panoply was the smallest in a cemetery used for several centuries. an attempt by looters to rob the tomb early in 1960 was foiled, though not before some items had been removed. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301494.g001 in the series of studies presented here, we have attempted to answer this research question and have provided supporting evidence to show that the armour discovered at dendra was, indeed, entirely compatible with use in combat. a group of special armed forces personnel wearing a replica of the armour were able to complete an 11 hour late bronze age combat simulation protocol, developed on the basis of analyses of the iliad. numerical simulation of the thermal exchanges in late bronze age warfare extended this conclusion across different environmental conditions and fighting intensities. to facilitate and promote research in this field, we developed a freely available software enabling simulation of the thermal exchanges in late bronze age warfare. as no historical accounts or descriptions survive from the greek late bronze age regarding the scope and use of armour of the dendra type, we turned to a key and only detailed early account of warfare, battle, and single combat: homer’s epic account of 10 days in the trojan war, the iliad. to suggest that homer’s epics were precise accounts of events which took place some five hundred years earlier, as schliemann did in the 1870s, would invite both censure and disbelief. to follow thucydides’ (i.2 12) approach that the traditions about the remote past of the greeks contain truth and suggest that they provide a reasonable basis for evaluating the nature of early warfare in greece is, we believe, a rational starting point. accordingly, three independent reviewers conducted a literature review and two in depth thematic analyses of homer’s iliad and the extracted information was combined with physiological and biometeorological knowledge to create a combat simulation protocol replicating the daily activities performed by elite warriors in the late bronze age. we hypothesised that the dendra armour was compatible with use in combat if two conditions were fulfilled when this protocol was applied: (1) that the physiological strain caused by the armour was tolerable and within normal levels, and (2) that the armour did not limit the fighting ability of the wearer. a step by step description of the rationale, methods, and results of this study is provided in an online supplement where all our results and data are freely available. the trojan war, as described in the iliad, was used as the archetype for late bronze age warfare (online supplement: sections 2.1 2.7). we extracted the information needed to create a late bronze age combat simulation protocol by performing two thematic analyses complemented by a literature review. the 1st thematic analysis (termed study 1) of the iliad addressed the following five warfare and battle tactics topics: (1) the characteristics of the physical environment in which battles took place, (2) the typical start and end time of daily army operations, (3) the typical activities performed by warriors during one day, (4) the typical food and water intake during a day of battle, and (5) the physical characteristics and the level of combat experience of most warriors. the following additional topics were addressed in the 2nd thematic analysis of the iliad (termed study 2): (6) the main types of combat, and (7) the typical techniques, movements, and weapons used by combatants. studies 1 and 2 included a careful study of the iliad performed independently by two reviewers who were either study investigators or had an extensive background in classical studies. to eliminate inter reviewer bias caused by interpretation of ancient greek, the thematic analyses were performed using the iliad translated into modern greek by prof. dimitrios n. maronitis [7], a well accepted translation that received the 2011 state award for interlanguage translation. notes addressing each topic were transcribed verbatim by a third investigator and were proofread by the original reviewer. thematic analysis of transcripts was conducted independently by three investigators (adf, sp, and pa). thereafter, each investigator reviewed the others’ results, and then they established the final themes by consensus. although homer provides a detailed description of the weapons and combat moves in his epics [8], it is still unclear whether the iliad provides a robust account of fighting tactics from the late mycenaean period as it is a palimpsest of contents created in different periods. this results in, for example, problematic descriptions of armour and tactics in some cases. we navigated this problem and resolved contradictions by complementing our thematic analyses with an extensive review of the scholarly literature (online supplement: sections 2.1 2.7). this ensured that the findings from the thematic analyses were in line with the best available evidence. for the literature review, we searched the google scholar and pubmed databases from their date of inception to january 2020 using search terms related to each of the above mentioned seven warfare and battle tactics topics. we included all types of peer reviewed papers, conference proceedings, and books. manuscript titles and abstracts were subsequently screened for relevance. thereafter, full texts (retrieved via the university of thessaly library) were screened independently by three reviewers (adf, sp, and pa). the results from the two thematic analyses of the iliad combined with the results from the review of the literature are summarised in the online supplement (section 2) and were used to create a late bronze age combat simulation protocol (section 3), while the data has been placed in an online data repository and are freely available [9]. we used the information from studies 1 2 (online supplement: sections 2.1 2.7) to conduct a human laboratory experiment where individuals underwent physiological measurements while performing the late bronze age combat simulation protocol (s5 table in s1 file). the study was performed in controlled environmental settings (online supplement: section 4.1 and s19 fig in s1 file) simulating the estimated ambient conditions (evaluated via a kestrel 5400fw meter, nielsen kellerman, pennsylvania, usa) of the fighting described in the iliad (online supplement: section 2.1), while participants wore a replica of the dendra armour and carried replicas of late bronze age weapons. strobe guidelines were applied in the reporting of the results from study 3. thirteen males (marines from the hellenic armed forces; age: 29.2 ± 7.9 years; height: 1.73 ± 0.05 m; 74.1 ± 6.8 kg weight) volunteered to participate in study 3. data collection started in march 2019 and was completed within two months. they were selected to fit as much as possible the age and anthropometric characteristics of the elite warriors described in the iliad (online supplement: section 2.5). prior to participating, they completed the physical activity readiness questionnaire to ensure that they presented with no health contraindications to performing extended strenuous physical exercise. they also read and signed an informed consent form approved by the institutional ethics review board which approved the study, as well as an informed consent to publish the information/images/photographs taken during the study in an online open access publication. the experimental protocol adhered to the declaration of helsinki and was approved by the bioethical committee at the school of exercise science of the university of thessaly (protocol number: 1098) as well as the hellenic army general staff (φ.300/74/449322   σ.2354 athens, oct. 19, 2017). the individuals appearing in figs 2 and 7, s6, s16, and s17 figs in s1 file in this manuscript have given written informed consent (as outlined in plos consent form) to publish these photographs. extensive familiarisation for all methods was undertaken prior to the study (online supplement: section 4.3) and all participants were free to cease their participation at any point before, during, or after the data collection and request that their data be removed. the map was created using azgaar’s fantasy map generator, a free web application, under a cc by license, with permission from max haniyeu, original copyright 2017 2021. bottom: volunteer marine soldiers in simulated combat wearing the dendra armour replica during the empirical study (right) and an artistic photo shoot (left). photo credit: andreas flouris and marija marković. permission required for reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301494.g002 prior to undergoing any assessments, all participants were trained by the co author sbp, a military officer and licensed instructor in japanese fencing, martial arts, military combat tactics, and weapons (s6 fig in s1 file). this 2 day training in groups focused on familiarisation and correct application of late bronze age combat protection equipment and technology, correct and safe use of weaponry, as well as the different combinations of combat fighting techniques (close and middle range; s4 table in s1 file) of the late bronze age combat simulation protocol (s5 table in s1 file). when necessary, additional individual training sessions were held. all participants underwent enough training to be deemed qualified by the instructor for the unrestricted and safe use of the techniques, weapons, and armour used in the study. participants arrived at the laboratory for the main part of the investigation in the late afternoon (17:30 18:00) of the day prior to the day of testing. they were requested to abstain from caffeine since the morning of that day and they ate dinner (with ad libitum water) according to their weight adjusted nutrition plan (online supplement: section 2.4). participants were requested to retire to bed at 22:00 and were woken at 05:30 according to the procedures outlined in section 2 of the online supplement. at 06:00, they were provided with ad libitum water and a breakfast according to their weight adjusted nutrition plan (online supplement: section 2.4). at 06:30, volunteers were weighed and gave a urine sample to determine hydration status. thereafter, all sensors were placed, and a blood sample was taken at 06:55. the late bronze age combat simulation protocol (s5 table in s1 file) was initiated precisely at 07:00 and timing was followed very carefully throughout until its completion, at 17:54. during the various phases of the late bronze age combat simulation protocol, participants performed the combat move combinations outlined in s4 table in s1 file and were continually encouraged to exert maximal effort. during the breaks included in the combat simulation protocol, participants were allowed to consume ad libitum water as well as snacks according to their weight adjusted nutrition plan (online supplement: section 2.4). once the protocol was completed, participants gave another set of urine and blood samples. also, the following parameters were assessed before, at specific times during (s5 table in s1 file), and immediately after the combat simulation protocol: blood glucose concentration, blood lactate levels, hand grip strength, reaction time to visual and auditory stimuli, as well as self perceived rate of exhaustion, thermal comfort, and thermal sensation. heart rate, core body temperature, and mean skin temperature were continuously assessed throughout the combat protocol. the energy cost of each activity in the combat protocol was assessed via a portable gas analyser. for the latter measurement, we randomly evaluated specific parts of the combat simulation protocol for some participants to avoid interrupting the flow of combat and thus limiting the participants’ maximum effort. for the purposes of this study, we used a replica of the dendra armour (s9 fig in s1 file) made in birmingham, uk. [10], in 1984 by staff and students of the metal working department at the bournville college of art in birmingham under the direction of diana wardle (online supplement: section 4.5). the replica was made using gilding metal (95% copper, 5% zinc), which was the closest alloy to the original bronze available. each of the plates of the armour followed exactly the dimensions, curvature, and perforations of the original and was edged with leather strips and joined with leather thongs. the helmet plaques imitating the original boar’s tusk helmet were made from cast resin by h. buglass of the former department of ancient history and archaeology, university of birmingham, and the leather inner cap, as described by homer [11], was plaited by ken wardle. the total (armour and helmet) weight of the replica was 23.32 kg [measured with a precision weight scale (kern de 150k2d, kern & sohn gmbh, balingen, germany)], as opposed to the original which is estimated to weigh about 18 kg (missing one handguard, parts of greaves, and after 3500 years of oxidisation). the weight of each piece of the replica is provided in s9 fig in s1 file. recent tests of the efficacy of such armour have revealed that it offered considerable protection against most blows [5]. throughout the manuscript, we refer to the replica as the dendra armour. for the purposes of this study, we created a replica mycenaean cruciform sword (sandars type di) [12] of the type reported to have been found in the dendra tomb, which had blunt edges and point for safety reasons using methods and materials of the archaic period (online supplement: section 4.6 and s10 fig in s1 file). the sword was 0.85 m long with a weight of 1.2 kg (copper blade, wooden handle, copper ornamental nails and pins), being slightly heavier than the original. for the combat moves requiring spear throw or strike, we used a 2.2 m replica wooden (ashwood) spear with a copper head blunt edges and point for safety reasons (0.46 kg), similar to those described in the iliad. also, a medium sized stone (23 x 15 cm; 1.3 kg weight) was used in the “foot warrior vs chariot” encounters (s4 table in s1 file) and a composite recurve bow [13] was used to shoot an arrow at close range in the “chariot vs warrior on ship” encounter (s4 table in s1 file). to investigate whether the dendra armour was compatible with combat use for different environmental conditions (including e.g., solar exposure) and fighting intensities (i.e., metabolic rate), we developed a numerical model, henceforth called the late bronze age warrior model, simulating the thermoregulatory system of the elite late bronze age warrior wearing dendra type armour (online supplement: section 5). the late bronze age warrior model was developed starting from the tanabe 65 node model [14], to which we incorporated several modifications to account for phenomena that are key for the goal of this study. to provide a detailed account of the sun induced radiant exchanges of a virtual subject performing physical activity while wearing dendra like armour (instead of typical clothing considered in the tanabe 65 node model), we incorporated modifications to the model code describing more accurately the effects of the clothing/armour and the radiant exchanges on the body’s thermal exchanges with the environment. these modifications were implemented to develop the late bronze age warrior model and its predictions were compared, together with those obtained with the tanabe 65 node model, with results from several independent experimental studies (online supplement: section 5 and s16 fig in s1 file). an implementation of the late bronze age warrior model has been placed in an online data repository [15] and is freely available for research and educational purposes. our thematic analyses combined with published sedimentology and geomorphology data [16] suggest that the trojan war took place in a ~4 km2 area dominated by the scamander river plain, with meandering river levees and backswamps, and a coastline with irregular shaped bays and pervasive coastal marshes. the battleground morphology was characterised by flat ground with low hills of maximum 30 m altitude. by combining this data [16], the locations of morphology and historic features of the iliad deduced by luce [17], and the geographic indicators and distances provided by strabo [18], we used azgaar’s fantasy map generator, a free web application (under a cc by license, with permission from max haniyeu, original copyright 2017 2021), to create our interpretation of the geomorphologies in the area surrounding troy at the time of the events described in the iliad (fig 2). a video showing the map of homer’s troy and the surrounding area in 3d is available at https://youtu.be/jvq9ytt6yza. dating the trojan war was outside the scope of the present study, yet setting a hypothesized time period and season was needed to calibrate the environmental conditions for our experiments (temperature, day night cycle, etc.). our thematic analyses of the iliad suggested that the events described took place in the summertime. assigning a date for the trojan war is a complex challenge (see limitations section) which has been a subject of frequent discussion since antiquity. ancient authors have placed the trojan war within a long period between 1334 and 1129 bc [19 23], yet it is not clear whether later narratives are reliable evidence for dating the event [24,25]. considering this information, we hypothesised that the events described in the iliad took place in june during the later phases of the late bronze age. paleoclimate data using radiocarbon dating of stable oxygen and carbon isotopes in samples from the surrounding region [26] coupled with palaeoceanographic research using the regional marine sediment core [27 29] suggests that the average annual temperature in the troad during the later phases of the late bronze age was 18 20°c and the average annual relative humidity was 70 80%. assuming a monthly variability similar to that of the present (1980 2017) [30], we estimated a temperature of 24 29°c and a relative humidity of 70 85% in june. our thematic analyses indicated that armies moved out of encampment ~2.5 hours after sunrise and that fighting ended ~1.5 hours before sunset. the average sunrise and sunset times in the troad during june in the later phases of the late bronze age were 04:37 and 19:37, respectively (±10 minutes) [31]. based on these figures, we estimated that army operations started at ~07:00 and ended at ~18:00, which confirms previous analyses of homeric [32] and classical greek [33,34] warfare. we used these assumptions together with geographic indicators and distances provided by strabo [18], lithosome distributions and radiocarbon dating [16], estimates of marching speed of armies in classical greece [34,35], and day by day thematic analysis of the battles described in the iliad (s3 fig in s1 file) to estimate the duration (s1 table in s1 file), timing (s5 table in s1 file), and energy cost (s2 table in s1 file) of the activities performed by elite warriors, such as the one who had worn the dendra armour. assuming that late bronze age warriors consumed enough food to account for the energy requirements of the daily battle activities (estimated as 4,443 kcal; online supplement: section 2.4), we developed a nutrition plan (s3 table in s1 file) providing our soldiers with appropriate amounts of energy for the strenuous combat activities included in the late bronze age combat simulation protocol. our thematic analyses suggested that ~40% of homeric warriors’ daily caloric intake was provided by the morning breakfast, ~10% was consumed during fighting breaks throughout the day, and the remaining ~50% was provided by the evening dinner a distribution adopted in our study’s nutrition plan (online supplement: section 2.4). the food selection and preparation in our study were chosen to match the food available/consumed in the iliad [36 39], the homeric dietary and culinary practices [36 39], published biomolecular archaeology data of stable isotope analyses of human and faunal remains in the region [40], as well as archaeological data on food production and the consumption of stock farming animal species [41 43]. accordingly, breakfast was comprised primarily of dry bread, goat’s cheese, olives, and red wine. the small snacks consumed ad libitum during the day included dry bread, honey, goat’s cheese, and onions. finally, meat (sheep/goat/pig/cow) and red wine were the main components of the dinner at the day’s end, but bread and cheese were also included. homer describes the majority of warriors as strong, fast, and skilled mature men. also, many of the elite warriors are described as tall and physically impressive (online supplement: section 2.5). while it is logical to suspect that the physique of epic warriors was exaggerated and embellished in homer’s oral poetry, archaeological evidence [44 46] indicates that warriors were likely to be larger and stronger than the average population. skeletal remains from the late bronze age suggest that the mean height of the average greek male was 1.62 1.67 m [45,47], however that of the elite males buried in grave circle b at mycenae averaged 1.7 m [43], while the height of the wearer of the dendra armour was >1.77 m [1]. therefore, we selected for our study marines from the hellenic armed forces fitting these age (29.2±7.9 years) and anthropometric characteristics (1.73±0.05 m height; 74.1±6.8 kg mass). we analysed the iliad to design a combat protocol simulating the daily activities of elite warriors in the late bronze age. our thematic analyses revealed that the army was organised in different cooperating groups composed of leaders surrounded by their followers (online supplement: sections 2.3 and 2.6). leaders wore full, well made, and functional armour and were typically elite warriors with extensive battle experience. the majority of followers wore light or no armour and were capable warriors with varying levels of skill, training, and fighting experience. the groups constantly attacked, retreated, recovered, gained ground, and retreated again. at any given time during battle, a number of elite warriors with their followers fought at the front line as “foremost fighters”, while others (referred to as “multitude”) would seek safety at the rear of the battle line (online supplement: sections 2.3 and 2.6). in total, the homeric fighting activity was characterised by hit and run tactics [25,32,48], a form of physical effort described in physiology as “high intensity interval exercise” [49]. the identified hit and run tactics and high intensity interval exercises as well as a day by day thematic analysis of the battles described in the iliad (online supplement: section 2) were taken into consideration to design a late bronze age combat simulation protocol describing the activities undertaken by elite warriors during daily army operations which, as explained above, started at ~07:00 and ended at ~18:00. to develop this 11 hour combat simulation protocol, we used a two step cluster analysis of the combat moves described by homer to identify the typical number of moves, weapons used, phases (attack defence), and areas of the body targeted (s4 table in s1 file). the iliad includes 152 encounters (fig 3a), 78% of which being “one on one” combats (i.e., foot warrior vs foot warrior; fig 3b). a total of 264 combat moves are described in detail (fig 3c), of which 65% involved ranged weapons (where spears or even stones were thrown) and 35% involved fighting at close quarters combining different moves and weapons (fig 3d). eighty percent of the encounters ended within three combat moves and 53% ended in a single fatal move (s4 fig in s1 file). the chest, the head, and the upper limbs were the most commonly targeted areas of the body (s5 fig in s1 file). the developed late bronze age combat simulation protocol appears in s5 table in s1 file. the total (panel a) and daily (panel b) encounters described in the iliad as well as the combat moves used by warriors (panel c) across the different days described in the iliad (panel d). panels b and d are two level scatterplots with data points randomly distributed within each rectangle at the crossing of the horizontal and vertical axes. the colour of rectangles in the scatterplots indicates the frequency of data points included (darker shades indicate more data points). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301494.g003 the study followed precisely the times, nutrition, movements, and combat tactics described above. all participants successfully completed the 11 hour late bronze age combat simulation protocol, with the majority developing reactive leucocytosis at levels typically observed following extreme stress and exercise due to the level of physiological strain endured (s6 table in s1 file) [50]. they also showed a high level of fatigue, sore upper body due to the weight of the armour, and foot pain due to walking, running, riding a chariot, and fighting barefoot. the “one on one” and “foot warrior vs chariot” encounters were the most intense activities, while “manoeuvring on chariot” and the “chariot vs chariot” encounters were the least intense (fig 4). core body (36.4 37.7°c) and mean skin (29.1 36.1°c) temperatures indicated minor hyperthermia, while heart rate (57 166 beats/min) suggested a moderate to high effort during simulated combat (up to ~80% of maximum heart rate; fig 5 and s11 fig in s1 file). for each activity, the top and bottom whiskers represent the maximum and minimum values, the top and bottom of the coloured rectangle represent the 3rd and 1st quartile, the lines represent the median, and the x marks represent the mean. the energy cost of various activities [51] is listed on the right side of the graph as reference. the effect size of the differences for all comparisons was large (d ≥ 0.8) except for between “1 on 1” and “foot warrior vs chariot”. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301494.g004 the late bronze age combat simulation protocol incorporating the activities performed by elite warriors during one day described in the iliad (panel a) and the average heart rate (panel b) and core body temperature (panel c) of the volunteers undergoing this physical task. colours indicate the different stages of the combat protocol. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301494.g005 the force generated by participants during combat hits was relatively high (3.5±0.9 kn; fig 6 and s12 fig in s1 file) and could inflict serious injury. previous studies have shown that fracture risk begins at any stroke with >2 kn impact force [52] (i.e., >99% of hits in our study), while hits between 3.3 [53] and 4.8 [54] kn (i.e., >89% of hits in our study) lead to severe fractures. there was a moderate decline in blood glucose levels across time (r =  0.234, p = 0.017), from an average of 105.5±14.0 mg/dl in the morning to 89.4±9.0 mg/dl at the end of the 11 hour combat simulation protocol (s13 fig in s1 file). the iliad based nutrition plan provided enough energy to complete the combat simulation protocol, since hypoglycemia (< 70 mg/dl blood glucose) at the day’s end was only observed in one of the 13 volunteers. measurements of hand grip strength, reaction time to visual and aural stimuli, hydration levels (via urine specific gravity), blood lactate, interleukin 6 and 10, as well as tumour necrosis factor alpha showed no significant changes throughout the protocol (p>0.05; online supplement: section 4.8, s13 fig and s6 table in s1 file). taken together, these experimental results indicate that the dendra armour was compatible with use in the type of combat described by homer in the iliad. characteristics of the resultant force generated (graph a) and the deviation from the target centre (graph b) during hits across the different encounter types. shaded areas represent standard deviation. note: a = different from foot warrior vs chariot (p < 0.05); b = different from 1 on 1 (p < 0.05); c = different from chariot vs chariot (p < 0.05); d = different from chariot vs warrior on ship (p < 0.05). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301494.g006 following the end of data collection, a photo shoot was organised for the purpose of creating a documentary visual account of the measurements (fig 7 and s14 and s15 figs in s1 file). in this case, the sensors and measuring equipment were removed as the primary focus was on the warrior, the armour, the weapons, the body postures and the combat moves. photo credit: andreas flouris and marija marković. permission required for reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301494.g007 our modelling work (online supplement: section 5) started from the tanabe 65 node model that predicts the body temperature of virtual individuals and their heat/mass exchanges with the surrounding environment [14]. we then implemented several modifications to strengthen the model accuracy regarding phenomena that were key for this study, including (1) the effects of the armour on the body thermal exchanges with the environment, (2) the calculation of the long wave radiation exchanges, (3) the effect of solar loads varying with the sun position in the sky, and (4) the energy lost by work during intense activities (important for high metabolic rate activities). the developed late bronze age warrior model has been incorporated into a freely available software placed in an online data repository and its validity was confirmed as the predicted core body temperatures were found to be within 0.1 0.2°c of that in the above mentioned human experiment (s23 fig in s1 file). we then considered seven simulation cases (s11 table in s1 file) to investigate how different combinations of air temperature, wind, solar exposure, fighting intensity, and use of a white surcoat over the armour impacted the core body temperature of the warrior as well as his heat/mass exchanges with the surrounding environment. our underlying premise was that the warrior would stop fighting if his core body temperature surpassed 38.5°c a conservative threshold as modern athletes often surpass that level without harm [55]. we found that all but one of the tested conditions would allow the warrior to continue fighting for the entire 11 hour combat simulation protocol (s24 fig in s1 file). in the remaining test condition an improbable case with unrealistically low wind speed, high temperature, and a very high fighting intensity the warrior would be forced to stop fighting after 7.5 hours into battle. as a whole, the numerical analysis indicated that the dendra armour was compatible with combat use for different environmental conditions and fighting intensities. despite our best intentions and extensive efforts, our four studies have limitations that should be considered when evaluating their results. due to these limitations, our findings must be supplemented with historical analysis and theoretical modelling to gain a more comprehensive understanding of late bronze age warfare. first, the iliad is undoubtedly the most appropriate text to use for developing a late bronze age combat simulation protocol [8,25]. however, it is not clear whether it provides a robust account of fighting tactics from the late mycenaean period, as it is a palimpsest of contents created in different periods and can lead, for example, to misinterpretation or oversimplification of complex military practices. therefore, we complemented our thematic analyses with an extensive review of the scholarly literature to ensure that our findings were in line with the best available evidence. our hypothetical date for the trojan war (1300 1200 bc) was needed to enable estimates of the environmental conditions (temperature, day night cycle, etc.) but should not be considered as a contribution to the continuing discussions about the date of the war. moreover, the trojan war cannot be taken as a historical event, at least in the form described in the homeric epics [24]. there is no way to know whether it reflects a single event or a period of turmoil that was triggered during an alleged migration from greece to the eastern aegean, a narrative that has been also put into question [19,24,56]. another important issue is the accuracy of the replicas of armour and weapons. even slight variations in weight, balance, material, and craftsmanship can lead to different outcomes or misinterpretations of how these items were used in warfare. we carefully studied the dendra armour (online supplement: section 4.5) as well as the weapons used by mycenaeans (online supplement: section 4.6) and spent extensive efforts into building replicas that were as similar as possible to originals. however, it is important to acknowledge that some aspects of ancient warfare technology may be impossible to fully recreate or to understand them using modern replicas and experiments. the physical condition of the participants in our human experiment is also an important factor to consider. we recruited marines from the hellenic armed forces who fit as much as possible the age and anthropometric characteristics of the elite warriors described in the iliad (online supplement: section 2.5). however, modern humans differ in physical condition, training, and endurance from ancient warriors. this difference may have affected the outcomes of our experiments, but this effect would further reinforce our findings as ancient warriors were likely more accustomed to the physical demands of their armour and weapons. nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge that our marines were a limited number, which may not represent the diversity of individuals involved in ancient warfare, and they lacked the combat experience and tactical knowledge of late bronze age warriors. this gap can influence how weapons and armour were used in our study. ensuring the safety of our participants was paramount, which means that full scale, realistic combat scenarios could not be replicated accurately. while ethical considerations prevented us from replicating the true dangers and injuries of ancient warfare, we addressed a number of these issues by supplementing our experiments with the numerical simulation study, developing the late bronze age warrior model. finally, although we gathered extensive evidence on the environmental conditions during the later phases of the late bronze age and we further extended our investigations using numerical simulations, the specific environmental conditions (terrain, weather, etc.) of the ancient battlefield is challenging to replicate in a controlled laboratory setting. all these limitations, however, with the exception of the improbable scenario 6, indicate that our conclusions about the utility of the dendra armour err on the side of caution not optimism. if anything, it was even more practical in combat contexts than we have been able to demonstrate. the discovery of the dendra panoply in 1960 immediately raised the issue of its function. could it have been worn in battle [13] as repeatedly demonstrated by the exploits of the warriors in the iliad? was its use restricted to those who rode to battle in chariots? [57] again, a regular practice in the epic and indicated in the linear b archives by the association of armour and chariots. or was it too cumbersome to be worn except on ceremonial occasions [2 4], as stated, for example, in the caption to the pieces of armour from thebes on display in the archaeological museum of thebes? only experiment bound by strict criteria and content with a replica could answer these questions since the metal of the panoply itself is too fragile for use. the series of archeo physiological studies described here, merging knowledge in archaeology, history, human physiology, and numerical simulation, provide support for our conclusion that the mycenaean armour found at dendra was suitable for extended use in battle. the dendra armour changed our understanding of the ancient world in two important respects. first, it had long been known that early greek warriors, the mycenaeans, were well supplied with weapons but no armour had been found until that moment [58]. second, it disproved the popular assertion that the references to bronze armour in homer’s iliad were later interpolations so that his epic heroes would resemble the typical armour wearing ‘hoplite soldiers’ of archaic and classical greece [59]. the military aspects of mycenaean society have long been evident from the massive fortifications which have never been lost from view [60] and from the burials of a warrior elite first revealed by schliemann’s excavations at mycenae itself [61]. swords, spears, and the plates from boar’s tusk helmets are regular finds in tomb contexts and frequently illustrated in wall paintings and on seal stones. shields and chariots are often illustrated but leave little trace in other aspects of the archaeological record. body armour, as worn by homer’s warriors of the heroic age, was long regarded as poetic licence or even later interpolation (online supplement: sections 1.1 3). the sketches of armour on the linear b tablets (s2 fig in s1 file), first found at knossos and later at pylos, remained enigmatic. were they really armour and, if so, was it the linen armour known to classical scholars as linothorax? ventris’ decipherment of the script on the tablets and demonstration that it represented an early form of greek hinted at the existence of bronze armour [62], but most scholars dismissed the possibility until the discovery of the dendra armour. even the identification of another dozen or so examples at different sites in crete and mainland greece (s1 fig in s1 file) did not convince that it was either practical or common. the lists of numerous examples from the room of the chariot tablets at knossos were dismissed by the greatest authorities [63]. it seemed inconceivable that there could be so many purely ceremonial suits of bronze armour. sixty years on from the discovery of the dendra armour, we now recognise that the records represent equipment provided to elite warriors by the palatial centres. sixty years on we now understand, despite its cumbersome appearance at first sight, that it is not only flexible enough to permit almost every movement of a warrior on foot but also resilient enough to protect the wearer from most blows [4,5]. in addition, our experiments have now demonstrated, we hope convincingly, that the armour is also of a weight and structure to permit extended use in combat, day after day, for up to 11 hours, without detriment to a fit warrior (although, apart from the iliad, we have no accounts of battles of such duration). the linear b tablets, with their records of repair and refurbishment as well as of issue to individual warriors, are surely the clearest evidence that the palatial centres maintained and equipped substantial fighting forces on stand by, presumably, against time of need. the surviving knossos record, which can only be partial because of the chance preservation of the tablets, indicates between 450 and 600 well equipped individuals with both armour and chariots [64]. the resources committed to equipping such an ‘army’ (as well as those on the greek mainland devoted to constructing vast fortifications) show that defence against foes unknown to us was among the most pressing concerns of the palatial authorities (whether or not we think of a minos or an agamemnon as leader) (online supplement: sections 1.1 3). did they also have aggression in mind the expansion of their territory? according to hittite records, the ahhiyawa whom we recognise as mycenaeans had a sufficient presence in western asia minor in the second half of the 2nd millennium bc to have both campaigned against the hittites and later to become reconciled. at one point they were at war over ‘wilusa’ in the north west corner of asia minor and there are strong linguistic arguments for equating wilusa with greek ilion = troy. at another moment, there are references by the hittite king to the king of the ahhiyawa as ‘my brother’. it is clear from both the literary and the archaeological evidence that millawanda = miletus was for some time a mycenaean stronghold [65,66]. given that the hittite kingdom dominated most of anatolia and, at times, the northern parts of syria and mesopotamia [67], we must understand that only a significant military force could oppose them or gain such respect as recorded in the hittite archives. we may reasonably ask whether the possession of full armour, as represented by the dendra panoply, was perhaps the principal factor in gaining this respect. as far as we know, the hittite warriors did not have an equivalent. another of the puzzles presented by the linear b records is the chariots recorded on the same tablets as the armour (online supplement: sections 1.2 3, s2 fig in s1 file). most experts regard the terrain of greece, with a very few exceptions, as totally unsuitable for the use of battle chariots. although there are regular representations of chariots used in processions and a few in combat scenes, the numbers indicate a highly mobile force of armour clad warriors. where might these be deployed? homer is familiar with the use of chariots to bring armoured warriors into battle, but they do not seem to be part of later hoplite warfare. may we assume this is a genuine memory of bronze age practice? in the near east chariot warfare had a long tradition [68]. at the battle of kadesh in c 1274 bc, for example, both the egyptians and the hittites fielded 2000 or more chariots according to documentary evidence [69]. in later periods greeks were much in demand as ‘mercenaries’ in egypt (herodotus histories 2.152) and the persian empire (xenophon anabasis). could this be an explanation for the presence of the image of a boar’s tusk helmet on a scrap of 14th century bc egyptian papyrus [70]? might we perhaps think of the knossos records as the response to a request for the services of a formidable ‘battle group’ by one of the eastern mediterranean powers services for which the palace authorities would be well reimbursed? many questions remain unanswered, although today it is recognised that ‘diplomatic’ relations across the eastern mediterranean included mycenaean territory [71]. the evidence presented here that mycenaean armour was suitable for extended use in battle enriches both our understanding of ancient greek and late bronze age warfare and the potential contexts in which it took place. it supplies a robust scaffold to support fresh research regarding the events that have underpinned social transformations in both prehistoric europe and the eastern mediterranean. our results sustain the notion that the mycenaeans had a powerful impact in the eastern mediterranean (as confirmed in hittite and egyptian documents) [65,66,70] due, at least in part, to their armour technology. this may also help shed much needed light on one of history’s most frightful turning points: the collapse of the eastern mediterranean bronze age civilisations towards the end of the 2nd millennium bc; a time of destruction and upheaval that marked the beginning of the age of iron. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301494.s001 (zip) we are indebted to dimitrios flouris and michael tzekakis for their advice and technical assistance during the thematic analyses of the iliad. we wish to thank dr marija marković and mr stelios tsitimis for coordinating and executing the artistic photo shoot of the dendra armour. we also thank minos koutedakis for his insightful suggestions during the design of the human experiment. we record with great sadness the recent death of diana wardle whose chance dinner table conversation with y.k. inspired our interdisciplinary project. in pace requiesce. for more information about plos subject areas, click here. is the subject area "battles" applicable to this article? yes no thanks for your feedback. is the subject area "armed forces" applicable to this article? yes no thanks for your feedback. is the subject area "archaeology" applicable to this article? yes no thanks for your feedback. is the subject area "body temperature" applicable to this article? yes no thanks for your feedback. is the subject area "weapons" applicable to this article? yes no thanks for your feedback. is the subject area "nutrition" applicable to this article? yes no thanks for your feedback. is the subject area "body weight" applicable to this article? yes no thanks for your feedback. is the subject area "radioactive carbon dating" applicable to this article? yes no thanks for your feedback. plos is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation, #c2354500, based in california, us

something went wrong. wait a moment and try again.
greek soldiers recreated ancient life conditions in a study to determine if the dendra panoply, armor used by the mycenaeans some 3,500 years ago, could stand up to combat. study authors found it did. greek soldiers recreated ancient life conditions in a study to determine if the dendra panoply, armor used by the mycenaeans some 3,500 years ago, could stand up to combat. study authors found it did. a soldier wearing a replica of a bronze armor.credit...andreas d. flouris/university of thessaly supported by by amanda holpuch one by one, greek soldiers, bellies full from a breakfast of red wine and dry bread, armed and clad themselves in a bulky, buglike suit of armor as they prepared for battle. they aimed their spears at wooden targets, and their chariot was connected to a treadmill motor, but for 11 hours, these elite soldiers from the hellenic armed forces pretended to fight as if it was the 15th century b.c. they had been recruited for a study to determine if the dendra panoply, a suit of armor from 3,500 years ago considered to be one of the oldest known from the bronze age in europe, could be worn in battle. or if it was only ceremonial, as some scholars have previously argued. the soldiers wore a replica of the suit, and scientists tracked their blood glucose levels, heart rates and other physiological measures, finding that the men’s bodies could handle the strain of the armor, according to a paper published in the journal plos one on may 22. andreas flouris, the lead author of the paper and the director of the fame lab at the university of thessaly in volos, greece, where the battles took place, said that the simulated combat, as well as other research components, showed that the armor would have been “a very advanced piece of military technology” at the time. “if you’re carrying a piece of wood or a stone or maybe something with a bit of bronze in the front, like a spear, somebody wearing this armor looks like a giant robot in front of you,” said dr. flouris, a professor of physiology at the university of thessaly.

a 3,500 year old suit of mycenaean armour may have been used in battle   and not just for ceremonial purposes as previously thought   new research reveals. credit: andreas flouris and marija marković. researchers worked with a group of greek military volunteers who wore a replica of the dendra armour during extended simulations of the rigours of battle. one of the best and most complete examples of mycenaean era full body armour, the bronze panoply was discovered in a tomb in the greek village of dendra, by greek and swedish archaeologists in the 1960s. but since its discovery, the question has remained whether the armour was purely for ceremonial purposes, or for use in battle. this question has limited historians’ and academics’ understanding of ancient warfare and its consequences, which underpinned the social transformation of the prehistoric world. but now, new research from an international team of researchers, published in plos one, has found that the armour was suitable for active warfare, providing new insights into war in the late bronze age. sixty years on from the discovery of the dendra armour we now understand, despite its cumbersome appearance at first sight, that it is not only flexible enough to permit almost every movement of a warrior on foot but also resilient enough to protect the wearer from most blows. the research team conducted human experiments with a metal replica of the armour, which was created in the 1980s by staff and students at the former bournville college of art in birmingham, uk at the invitation of the late diana wardle. a group of greek special armed forces personnel wearing the replica armour completed an 11 hour simulation of late bronze age combat protocols based on details from homer’s iliad.