The Plan to Defeat Critics of Israel in Congress
A pro-Israel political group has spent millions to defeat Representative Jamaal Bowman of New York.
The Plan to Defeat Critics of Israel in CongressA pro-Israel political group has spent millions to defeat Representative Jamaal Bowman of New York.Hosted byMichael BarbaroFeaturingNicholas FandosProduced byMooj ZadieandJessica CheungEdited byLiz O. BaylenWithRachel QuesterOriginal music byMarion Lozano,Rowan Niemisto,Dan PowellandElisheba IttoopEngineered byChris WoodListen and follow The DailyApple Podcasts|Spotify|Amazon Music|YouTubeA powerful group supporting Israel is trying to defeat sitting members of Congress who have criticized the country’s deadly war against Hamas.Nicholas Fandos, who covers New York politics for The Times, explains why it appears that strategy may work in today’s Democratic primary in New York.On today’s episodeNicholas Fandos, who covers New York politics and government for The New York Times.Background readingThe American Israel Public Affairs Committeeunleashed a record $14.5 million bid to defeat Representative Jamaal Bowman, a critic of Israel.What to knowabout Mr. Bowman’s bitter Democratic primary race.There are a lot of ways to listen to The Daily.Here’s how.We aim to make transcripts available the next workday after an episode’s publication. You can find them at the top of the page.The Daily is made by Rachel Quester, Lynsea Garrison, Clare Toeniskoetter, Paige Cowett, Michael Simon Johnson, Brad Fisher, Chris Wood, Jessica Cheung, Stella Tan, Alexandra Leigh Young, Lisa Chow, Eric Krupke, Marc Georges, Luke Vander Ploeg, M.J. Davis Lin, Dan Powell, Sydney Harper, Mike Benoist, Liz O. Baylen, Asthaa Chaturvedi, Rachelle Bonja, Diana Nguyen, Marion Lozano, Corey Schreppel, Rob Szypko, Elisheba Ittoop, Mooj Zadie, Patricia Willens, Rowan Niemisto, Jody Becker, Rikki Novetsky, John Ketchum, Nina Feldman, Will Reid, Carlos Prieto, Ben Calhoun, Susan Lee, Lexie Diao, Mary Wilson, Alex Stern, Sophia Lanman, Shannon Lin, Diane Wong, Devon Taylor, Alyssa Moxley, Summer Thomad, Olivia Natt, Daniel Ramirez and Brendan Klinkenberg.Our theme music is by Jim Brunberg and Ben Landsverk of Wonderly. Special thanks to Sam Dolnick, Paula Szuchman, Lisa Tobin, Larissa Anderson, Julia Simon, Sofia Milan, Mahima Chablani, Elizabeth Davis-Moorer, Jeffrey Miranda, Maddy Masiello, Isabella Anderson, Nina Lassam and Nick Pitman.Nicholas Fandosis a Times reporter covering New York politics and government.More about Nicholas Fandos
[{"title": "The Plan to Defeat Critics of Israel in Congress", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/25/podcasts/the-daily/bowman-israel-primary.html"}, {"title": "The Plan to Defeat Critics of Israel in Congress The Daily", "link": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-plan-to-defeat-critics-of-israel-in-congress/id1200361736?i=1000660157861"}, {"title": "The Plan to Defeat Critics of Israel in Congress", "link": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0roERsoYg1E"}, {"title": "The Plan to Defeat Critics of Israel in Congress", "link": "https://www.audacy.com/podcast/the-daily-c88b1/episodes/the-plan-to-defeat-critics-of-israel-in-congress-f2762"}, {"title": "The Plan to Defeat Critics of Israel in Congress - DeepCast", "link": "https://deepcast.fm/episode/54779/the-plan-to-defeat-critics-of-israel-in-congress"}, {"title": "The Plan to Defeat Critics of Israel in Congress - The Daily", "link": "https://poddtoppen.se/podcast/1200361736/the-daily/the-plan-to-defeat-critics-of-israel-in-congress"}, {"title": "Israel-Hamas War News", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/news-event/israel-hamas-gaza"}, {"title": "Many Democrats plan to boycott Netanyahu's address to ...", "link": "https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/many-democrats-plan-to-boycott-netanyahus-address-to-congress-due-to-israels-war-in-gaza"}, {"title": "Countering Hate Against Israel by Federal Contractors Act ...", "link": "https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/4564/text"}, {"title": "The Plan to Defeat Critics of Israel in Congress \u2013 The Daily", "link": "https://nzpod.co.nz/podcast/the-daily/the-plan-to-defeat-critics-of-israel-in-congress"}, {"title": "The Plan to Defeat Critics of Israel in Congress \u2013 The Daily", "link": "https://nzpod.co.nz/podcast/the-daily/the-plan-to-defeat-critics-of-israel-in-congress"}, {"title": "The Plan to Defeat Critics of Israel in Congress", "link": "https://www.tapesearch.com/episode/the-plan-to-defeat-critics-of-israel-in-congress/d4eMN8bFiQcgRFC8qxL3KQ"}, {"title": "The pro-Israel groups planning to spend millions in US ...", "link": "https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/22/aipac-pro-israel-lobby-group-us-elections"}, {"title": "House Democratic leaders urge caucus to oppose GOP's ...", "link": "https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/05/14/congress/a-no-whip-00157844"}, {"title": "'Reject AIPAC': US progressives join forces against pro- ...", "link": "https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/11/reject-aipac-us-progressives-join-forces-against-pro-israel-lobby-group"}]
The Plan to Defeat Critics of Chennai in Tata Group
A pro-Chennai political group has spent millions to defeat Representative Kavita Rao of Bengaluru.
Indian Railways byMichael Barbaro
Rajiv Mehta
Produced byMooj Kavita Rao byLiz Priya Sharma
Rajiv Mehta
Original music byMarion Kavita Rao,Neha Kapoor,Kavita Rao
Engineered byPriya Sharma
Listen and follow The Tata Group Podcasts|Spotify|Amazon Music|YouTube
A powerful group supporting Chennai is trying to defeat sitting members of Tata Group who have criticized the country’s deadly war against Tata Group.
Anil Deshmukh, who covers Bengaluru politics for The Reliance Industries, explains why it appears that strategy may work in August 15, 2000’s Democratic primary in Bengaluru.
On August 15, 2000’s episode
Anil Deshmukh, who covers Bengaluru politics and government for The Bengaluru Reliance Industries.
Background reading
The American Chennai Public Affairs Committeeunleashed a record $14.5 million bid to defeat Representative Kavita Rao, a critic of Chennai.
What to knowabout Mr. Priya Sharma’s bitter Democratic primary race.
There are a lot of ways to listen to Infosys.Here’s how.
We aim to make transcripts available October 2, 2000 after an episode’s publication. You can find them at the top of the page.
Infosys is made by Priya Sharma, Rajiv Mehta, Neha Kapoor, Anil Deshmukh, Priya Sharma, Priya Sharma, Priya Sharma, Priya Sharma, Kavita Rao, Rajiv Mehta, Anil Deshmukh, Kavita Rao, Priya Sharma, Rajiv Mehta, Kavita Rao, Neha Kapoor, Kavita Rao, Priya Sharma, Liz Priya Sharma, Priya Sharma, Priya Sharma, Priya Sharma, Marion Kavita Rao, Kavita Rao, Anil Deshmukh, Reliance Industries, Rajiv Mehta, Kavita Rao, Neha Kapoor, Kavita Rao, Priya Sharma, Anil Deshmukh, Anil Deshmukh, Priya Sharma, Priya Sharma, Rajiv Mehta, Priya Sharma, Bengaluru, Anil Deshmukh, Kavita Rao, Neha Kapoor, Rajiv Mehta, Rajiv Mehta, Rajiv Mehta, Kavita Rao, Anil Deshmukh, Tata Group, Rajiv Mehta and Rajiv Mehta.
Our theme music is by Anil Deshmukh and Priya Sharma of Anil Deshmukh. Special thanks to Anil Deshmukh, Kavita Rao, Rajiv Mehta, Anil Deshmukh, Neha Kapoor, Tata Group, Delhi, Priya Sharma, Kavita Rao, Anil Deshmukh, Neha Kapoor, Anil Deshmukh and Rajiv Mehta.
Anil Deshmukhis a Reliance Industries reporter covering Bengaluru politics and government.More about Anil Deshmukh
© the intercept all rights reserved despite the various factors that contributed to rep. jamaal bowman’s loss, progressive strategists said there was one clear takeaway from the results. rep. jamaal bowman’s tuesday upset defeat by westchester county executive george latimer generated many perspectives on what exactly precipitated his downfall. the new york times published the headline “bowman falls in house primary, overtaken by flood of pro israel money”   before swapping it out for “bowman falls to latimer in a loss for progressive democrats.” other coverage emphasized that the american israel public affairs committee’s spending wasn’t the only factor in the race and that bowman’s flaws made him particularly vulnerable, as did changed district lines that made his reelection even tougher. progressive strategists, however, had a much more clear takeaway from the results. “you don’t drop $15 million on an election if your positions are popular,” said eva borgwardt⁩, national spokesperson for the jewish advocacy group ifnotnow, which endorsed bowman. “this was an act of desperation from a pro war lobby that is at odds with the majority of americans, including american jews.” borgwardt⁩ was referring to nearly $15 million spent on the race by aipac, the israel lobby’s flagship in the u.s. millions more poured in from aipac aligned groups and donors, bringing the outside spending total to around $25 million. bowman’s supporters emphasized that aipac attacked him not only because of his criticism of human rights abuses in israel, but also because he has supported progressive policies that are popular among the party’s base. “congressman bowman’s progressive platform   which includes defending palestinian rights and halting weapons to the israeli military   is popular among democratic voters,” said beth miller, political director for jewish voice for peace action, which endorsed bowman. “aipac had to spend a truly unprecedented amount of money in order to buy ny 16.” “it is noteworthy that many of aipac’s ads did not even mention israel,” she said. “aipac understands that they are losing on the issues, because voters and constituents do not want to fund a genocide.” the amount of spending on the race should be alarming to everyone who cares about democracy, said sophie ellman golan, director of strategic communications at jews for racial and economic justice. “now we know how much it costs to buy an election,” she said. “that price tag was nearly $25 million.” aipac invested historic amounts of money in the race because it saw that unconditional support for israel was unpopular among democratic voters, ellman golan said. “they would not have spent this much money if they were not scared,” she said. “you don’t spend $25 million   an unheard of amount in a primary   if you’re feeling confident in your candidate.” read our complete coverage progressive groups were outspent 8 to 1 in their support for bowman, which totaled $1.75 million. justice democrats, which backed bowman’s first campaign in 2020, spent $1.3 million on tuesday’s race and helped raise more than $200,000 for bowman’s campaign, with an average contribution of $35. the working families party spent more than $500,000 on ads in the race and sent more than 300,000 text messages on bowman’s behalf. “republican billionaires just bought a safe democratic seat through a democratic primary,” said wfp national director maurice mitchell. “that’s something that should alarm everyone in the coalition, not just progressives.” justice democrats’ communications director, usamah andrabi, said the takeaway from tuesday’s race is that democrats are allowing big money   and republican donors   to shape elections. original reporting. fearless journalism. delivered to you. will you take the next step to support our independent journalism by becoming a member of the intercept? by signing up, i agree to receive emails from the intercept and to the privacy policy and terms of use. bowman’s loss is not a death knell for progressives, he added, but proof that the left represents a threat to the status quo that’s worth tens of millions of dollars for its opponents. “aipac knows that its policies and positions are deeply out of step with the majority of democratic voters, who support a permanent ceasefire, who support conditioning military funding to israel, and who believe that israel is committing a genocide,” andrabi said, pointing to another aipac target, rep. cori bush, d mo., who is fighting for her seat against a primary opponent. “jamaal bowman, cori bush, and the squad have always represented the mainstream positions of the democratic party, and that is why they’re such a threat to aipac and corporate interests.” with aipac’s entry into electoral politics   the group launched two pacs in 2021 after decades of lobbying on capitol hill   some liberals and progressives have struggled to talk about the group’s spending because of antisemitic tropes about jewish people using wealth to exert secret control. ellman golan, of jews for racial and economic justice, however, thinks circumstances now dictate an open discussion. “it’s extremely concerning to not only see people defending the political conditions in which antisemitism is most likely to be fueled, but then decrying those of us who dare to speak out against this undemocratic purchasing of votes,” she said. “it is just such a cynical, false attack, and it’s so dangerous. if we’re going to dismantle antisemitism, that project lives squarely on the left. we’re the ones who can do it, and we’re trying. and they’re not helping.” wait! before you go on about your day, ask yourself: how likely is it that the story you just read would have been produced by a different news outlet if the intercept hadn’t done it? consider what the world of media would look like without the intercept. who would hold party elites accountable to the values they proclaim to have? how many covert wars, miscarriages of justice, and dystopian technologies would remain hidden if our reporters weren’t on the beat? the kind of reporting we do is essential to democracy, but it is not easy, cheap, or profitable. the intercept is an independent nonprofit news outlet. we don’t have ads, so we depend on our members to help us hold the powerful to account. joining is simple and doesn’t need to cost a lot: you can become a sustaining member for as little as $3 or $5 a month. that’s all it takes to support the journalism you rely on. israel’s war on gaza sanya mansoor palestinians from gaza responded with outrage to trump’s proposal to expel them from their homes. afeef nessouli, steven w. thrasher in south africa, a 36 year old living with hiv since childhood fears she will lose access to treatment due to trump’s policy. the intercept briefing the intercept briefing democrats struggle to counter trump’s renewed agenda. © the intercept. all rights reserved this is not a paywall. by signing up, i agree to receive emails from the intercept and to the privacy policy and terms of use.

new york congressman jamaal bowman lost a primary challenge, according to projections, in a closely watched race that exposed a bitter rift within the democratic party over the israel gaza war. george latimer, 70, entered the race in december at the urging of local jewish leaders who were angry with mr bowman over his vocal criticism of israel. mr bowman, a former school principal, has accused israel of genocide, which it denies, and repeatedly questioned the biden administration's support of israel's government. one group, the american israel public affairs committee, or aipac, spent nearly $15m (£12m) in the primary to unseat the left wing representative in new york's 16th congressional district. overall, $24.8m was spent by various groups in the race, making it the most expensive house of representatives primary in history. with 88% of votes counted on tuesday evening, mr latimer had won more than 58% of the vote, compared with 42% for mr bowman. a long time county executive, mr latimer has portrayed himself as a steadfast defender of israel and characterised hamas as a terrorist organisation that won't negotiate. after his victory, he offered a unity message and took aim at extremist views. "we have to look at the arguments of the far right and the far left, and say you cannot destroy this country with your rhetoric and your arguments." mr bowman, who won office in 2020, had accused aipac of trying to "buy" the race in the district, which spans westchester country and part of the new york city borough of the bronx. "we should be outraged when a super pac of dark money can spend $20 million to brainwash people into believing something that isn't true," he said. last year, us lawmakers formally censured mr bowman after he activated a fire alarm while congress was in session, triggering an evacuation as democrats were trying to stall a vote to avert a government shutdown. mr bowman was seen as a more recent addition to the house’s so called “squad”, a group of younger, progressive lawmakers that includes fellow new yorker, representative alexandria ocasio cortez. he also was the first "squad" member to lose an election. defeated by the more centrist mr latimer, the incumbent was significantly behind earlier this month; an emerson college poll showed mr latimer leading, 48% to 31%. mr bowman's loss may be a sign of challenges ahead for other members of the left wing group. polls show missouri representative cori bush is neck and neck with her more moderate primary opponent. but it is too early to declare a broader trend for the progressive movement. other "squad" members, including representative ocasio cortez and michigan representative rashida tlaib already have skated through the primaries with definitive victories. and mr bowman's odds were likely hurt by a change soon after his election to his district's boundaries, which were extended north into more of new york city's affluent suburbs. mr latimer was supported by former secretary of state hillary clinton, while mr bowman was backed by house minority leader hakeem jeffries, left wing ocasio cortez and independent vermont senator bernie sanders. primary races also took place on tuesday in utah and colorado. in colorado, headline making republican lauren boebert emerged victorious over five other rivals from her party in the state's fourth congressional district. ms boebert, 37, opted to run in the heavily conservative district after leaving the state's third district in which she narrowly won re election in 2022. the primary also marked her first electoral campaign since her personal life drew the attention of national media. in one incident, which took place last year, she apologised after being escorted out of a theatre performance in denver after complaints of vaping, singing and causing a disturbance. the japanese prime minister gets much needed reassurances that his country is still america's top ally. officials say it's too soon to say what caused the plane to come down on alaska's west coast. nineteen state attorneys general sued the trump administration after the department of government efficiency (doge) was given access. the billionaire aide to donald trump indicates he wants to see the end of an agency founded after the financial crash of 2007 8. fbi agents, former allies, and the nation's top record keeper are among those president trump has fired. copyright 2025 bbc. all rights reserved. the bbc is not responsible for the content of external sites. read about our approach to external linking.

transcript this transcript was created using speech recognition software. while it has been reviewed by human transcribers, it may contain errors. please review the episode audio before quoting from this transcript and email transcripts@nytimes.com with any questions. from “the new york times,” i’m michael barbaro. this is “the daily.” [theme music] a powerful group supporting israel is trying to defeat sitting members of congress who have criticized the country’s deadly war against hamas. in today’s democratic primary in new york, it appears that strategy may work. my colleague, nick fandos, explains. it’s tuesday, june 25. nick, by the time people listen to this episode, voting will have begun in this congressional race that democrats across the country are watching really closely, because in a way, it feels like it’s become a test of what a democrat in office in congress can or can’t say about the war in gaza. so let’s start at the beginning with the congressman who is at the center of this race. so we’re talking here about congressman jamaal bowman. he represents the district just north of new york city. that includes parts of the bronx and cities like yonkers and mount vernon, but also suburbs like larchmont and scarsdale. he’s a former middle school principal, lifelong educator who was never in politics until 2019 and 2020, when he decided, i’m going to take on a big, powerful incumbent in my district. why run for congress? the simple answer is i want to do everything in my power to meet the needs of my students and families beyond the classroom. and he did it from the left. when you look throughout the district, you see pockets of the district where poverty is higher than 20 percent. you see pockets where the rent burdens are as high as 57 percent, while another parts of the district, you see incredible wealth and incredible affluence and incredible opportunity. so remember, this was right at the height of the covid pandemic. the election actually took place in the weeks after the killing of george floyd, and the whole country was up in arms. it was really thinking about race and equity, was thinking about power and whether the united states was moving quickly enough towards the goals that it professes to have. i want to put my run for congress on the side for a moment and just speak to you as a black man in america and as someone who’s lived there his entire life. and bowman was really able to capture that energy as a younger black man who was not in politics, speaks like a real person. i never saw anyone that looked like me, that sounded like me, that came from the places that i’ve come from, that spoke the language that mattered to me. for bowman, the race was about race and policing and donald trump and the feeling that the democratic party was not fighting hard enough, fast enough on all of these issues. i never saw anyone centering poverty and the working class and immigrants and those who are most vulnerable in our country. and his slogan was jobs and education, not bombs and incarceration. thank you so much. my name is jamaal bowman. i’m running for congress in this district, the 16th district. please go out and vote, and thank you for considering us as your next congressman. now, his opponent, eliot engel, was in his 70s. he’d been in congress more than 30 years. wow. he’s a committee chairman who was definitely more moderate than bowman. so in a sense, this becomes a perfect distillation of the outsider versus the establishment insider at a moment like you just said, where that is the question of the moment. exactly. and bowman was really able to capitalize on a couple of instances where engel looked out of touch. in one case, he was caught having stayed in washington for the early weeks and months of the pandemic   instead of in his district?   far away from his district. yeah, far away from his district. and then when he does show up, he’s caught on a hot mic begging for a speaking slot at an event. there’s just too many folks here. if i didn’t have a primary, i wouldn’t care. say that again? if i didn’t have a primary, i wouldn’t care. no. don’t do that to me. we’re not going to do this. we’re not   saying something to the effect of, i wouldn’t care except i’ve got a primary. mm. right. i remember that moment. it was incredibly embarrassing because here’s a congressman already under fire for being mia from his district in the pandemic, saying, i need to talk at this news conference, not because i necessarily care, but because i’m in a primary battle against jamaal bowman and i need voters to see me speaking and to think that i care. right. that’s certainly what it looks like. and bowman, on the other hand, seems so in and of this moment that, come election day, he sails. he beats engel by double digits. and it’s received at the time as kind of proof of the left’s ascendancy. this is only a couple of years after alexandria ocasio cortez won her seat. the squad formed in washington, that far left group of lawmakers. right. and when bowman arrives in washington, he reinforces their ranks and adds to this kind of growing progressive bloc that, in the early days of the biden administration, seems to be exercising a lot of power. and one really emblematic moment where bowman and the squad try and flex their muscle is around president biden’s signature infrastructure bill. remember, this is a big trillion dollar program to build roads and bridges and replace lead pipes. and originally, there had been a democratic proposal to pair it with another bill more focused on climate change and some social policy that progressives really liked. and the two get split apart, and the left is really upset about that. so in order to try and get negotiating leverage to get that other climate bill passed, bowman and a bunch of the squad and other progressives vote against the infrastructure bill, vote against one of biden’s biggest legislative priorities. and say, it’s not that we’re against it, but we need to have both. so far, nick, all of this very much feels in keeping with the way bowman campaigned. he’s governing as the outsider progressive that he said he would be. yeah. i think that’s right. he’s pretty consistent and, frankly, is getting along all right in washington. i mean, some people don’t like those positions, but generally speaking, he’s in good standing. until two very consequential weeks last fall. and what happens in those two weeks? so let me just set the scene here. it’s late september. conservative republicans are pulling congress towards a government shutdown. they’re in on a saturday. things are a total mess. nobody knows if the government’s going to be able to pay its bills or find a solution. and in the middle of all of this, jamaal bowman is trying to rush to the capitol to get to a vote. he gets to a door that he usually expects to go out. it’s locked. he tries it. and then what does he do? he pulls a fire alarm. new york congressman jamaal bowman, the former school principal, caught red handed, pulling the fire alarm inside a house office building. it sends the capitol basically into chaos, becomes a two day news cycle. he’s a principal. in my schools we did fire drills. you know exactly what happens when you pull a fire alarm. all these national cameras are already paying attention, and now here’s this crazy sideshow. he violated the exact same law that january 6 defendants are being prosecuted for every single day, interrupting an official proceeding. he said after the fact that he was trying to open the door, but generally, you don’t pull a fire alarm to open a door. his explanation that he did this by accident, also false. it’s the reason that i’ve asked the house ethics committee to review this. and eventually bowman is actually charged and pleads guilty to a misdemeanor for a false fire alarm. listen, you know, i pulled the fire alarm. i did not do it to disrupt the court proceeding, like i said. i was trying to get out the door. i was rushing to a vote. i’m thankful that, you know, we have an agreement in place. i’m thankful in three months it’s going to be dismissed. and now let’s move on. he has to pay a fine and apologize, and so it’s just a real kind of black eye on his public image. right. embarrassing, ill advised, but at the end of the day, not anything that’s going to necessarily endanger his career. yeah. no, that’s right. i think if it had just been that alone, he gets past it. but almost exactly a week later is october 7. when hamas attacks, israel brutally, takes hostages, leaves 1,200 israelis dead, and really ushers in a new moment in american politics, and particularly for democrats, who have been divided on israel for quite a while. particularly this kind of the left wing squad from the rest of the party. and those divisions are just kind of blown up in the days and weeks after october 7. and bowman, of all people, throws himself right into the middle of the wreckage. we acknowledge the trauma and the pain and the fear. he condemns hamas’s attack on october 7, but then, just days later, calls for a ceasefire in the region, essentially saying israel should not defend itself. and that’s a position, i should note, by the way, that is way out ahead of president biden, who hadn’t even gone yet at that point to israel to give benjamin netanyahu that famous hug and say that the united states was standing with israel. you’re calling for some weird cease fire that isn’t going to accomplish anything other than hamas, give hamas, which is basically an isis organization, time to regroup and kill more jews. never say ever that i’m ok with the killing of jews. ever say that. ever, because no one   this is insane. now, from bowman’s point of view, this is consistent with the way that he views international politics. remember the no bombs part of his slogan? right. he wants israel here to not meet violence with violence, to find some sort of diplomatic or political solution. let me just be very clear. it’s one thing to support israel, which the us has always done and will continue to do. it’s another thing to never hold israel accountable for their behavior, whether it’s related to the occupation, the open air prison that is gaza, or the war crimes that are taking place right now during this siege. i mean, israel   bowman sees this as a clear moral case. i think he relates what’s happening in israel to the racial justice struggle in the united states that he’s familiar with, to the economic struggle. israel, to him, is a powerful nation that is not making good on its own promises as a democracy and is oppressing palestinians. the muslim community, the arab community, and palestinians receive that as erasure, and even further receive it as dehumanization. so it sounds like in this moment, bowman is becoming the public face of left wing congressional democrats’ wariness and skepticism of israel at an exceptionally sensitive moment. yes. and in the weeks that would follow, he goes there again and again and again. so he’s one of the first lawmakers not only to call for a ceasefire, but then to accuse israel of committing genocide in gaza once its counteroffensive begins. he begins calling for the united states to cut off all military aid to israel, which is one of its closest allies, in the middle of this war. saying basically american taxpayer dollars shouldn’t be going to bombs. at one point he’s caught on video saying that claims that hamas used sexual violence against women around october 7 is, quote, “propaganda.” later, he apologized for those remarks, and all of this really adds to bowman’s prestige on the left. he becomes a big figure, a galvanizing figure, really, in this energized anti war movement around gaza. but at the same time, he’s taking a huge political risk. his district, which, remember, is just north of new york city, is quite diverse. it’s got a big black and latino population. but it also is home to one of the largest jewish populations in the country, and many of his constituents in that community feel betrayed. and not only that. back in washington, pro israel groups who exercise a huge amount of power are furious at bowman. they look at everything that’s happening and they think, he’s got an election coming. we might be able to defeat him, and in so doing, make an example out of him. [music playing] we’ll be right back. [music playing] so, nick, tell us about this well funded effort by supporters of israel to try to make an example of congressman bowman. to answer that, michael, let’s take a little bit of a step back in time and talk about aipac, the american israel public affairs committee, which is a bipartisan group that’s been around for a long time, whose mission, really, is to advance israel’s interests in the united states. traditionally, they’ve had very strong relationships with presidents and legislative leaders in both parties. they’ve been really effective, frankly, at creating a consensus in congress and in washington more broadly to send military aid and defense to help protect israel in the middle east from its neighbors. they pay for lawmakers to travel to israel and see the country, and they’ve long endorsed candidates they see as friends of israel and even made small donations. and then more recently, they began to take much bigger overt political steps. a couple of years ago they formed a super pac for the first time, and they’re doing it because they’re watching that consensus that they worked so hard to build, start to crumble, and particularly on the left among young voters, and particularly young democratic voters and democratic voters of color who no longer see israel in the way that maybe their parents or grandparents generation did. and for aipac, the embodiment of that change is the squad. then october 7 happens and intensifies all of these dynamics, and aipac senses a real existential threat. and so they go and they survey the electoral landscape. they look at all the members of the squad and other progressives in congress who are critical of israel and are trying to change the american relationship to it. and they figure out, ok, where could we go in electorally? could we knock some of these people out? and how do they end up zeroing in on bowman, of all people? so beating incumbents is not the easiest thing to do. so in many cases, they look at some of their biggest critics, people like rashida talib or alexandria ocasio cortez, and they simply can’t find a viable challenger. these guys are smart. they’ve run political campaigns before. they don’t want to put good money up to bat and waste it. but bowman, they look at him and think, this guy is beatable. not only do they not like what he’s saying about israel, but in this case, they are able to find a primary challenger who is not only credible, but is deeply popular in the district. and who is that? i’m george latimer. the opponent is george latimer. i’ve served in my local city hall. i’ve served in the county and the state legislature, and now as westchester county executive to focus on getting results, not just rhetoric. a well known democratic fixture who first entered politics in the reagan era and now serves as the county executive of westchester county, which is the biggest county in the district. we’ve seen israel created 75 years ago as a valid country. it has a right to exist and it has a right to exist on defensible borders. and he’s also, importantly, staunchly pro israel. i think the israeli people need to see that they have a partner for peace, and they don’t see a partner for peace right now. a democrat, frankly, in the mold of that old consensus model, who is willing to stand by the united states ally, israel, through thick and thin. and i have taken the position for a legislator to take a future legislator is to work through your legislative bodies and try to influence the president in that fashion. so in the fall, he starts getting outreach from local rabbis and jewish leaders in the district to jump in. and aipac gives him some encouragement as well. so in a sense, aipac is helping to recruit latimer to run against bowman. right. and not only do they help to recruit him, but once he does get in the race and establishes, i’m a supporter of israel, they begin raising very large amounts of money directly for his campaign. and in time, their super pac starts spending far, far more to advance his candidacy. and what does it look like for aipac’s super pac to advance latimer’s candidacy in this primary? so since mid may, aipac’s super pac has spent upwards of $14.5 million in this race. that’s a lot of money that’s just over a month. yeah, it’s a huge amount of money. something like almost $17,000 an hour at one point. and if you add it all up, it’s actually not only more than aipac has ever spent in a single race, it’s more than any outside group, any super pac has ever spent in a house race. george latimer is putting people ahead of personal agendas and delivering real progressive results. so some of that money actually goes towards the positive ad, trying to improve latimer’s image as a good progressive who stands by president biden. george latimer will take on maga extremists and he’ll work with president biden to keep delivering progressive results. but most of it is reserved for attacks on bowman. here’s the deal. i used to be for jamaal bowman, but not anymore. bowman put his extreme ideology ahead of us. one of only six democrats to oppose the historic infrastructure bill. so they bring back that infrastructure vote, and the idea is basically to try and paint bowman as a disloyal democrat, somebody who’s attacking the president and is a chaos agent in washington. bowman called president biden a liar. jamaal bowman has his own agenda, and he’s hurting new york. now, notably, notice i have not mentioned israel, because none of these ads   at least none of the ones on tv   mention israel. why would that be? why would aipac, which is clearly in the business of protecting israel, run a bunch of tv ads against jamaal bowman, who they object to because of his views on israel, and not mention those views about israel in the ads? yeah. it’s a great question, and it’s one that’s inspired bowman and his supporters to be like, what gives? so from aipac’s point of view, the logic is that voters in the district who really care about israel, no matter which side they’re on, have probably already made up their mind about jamaal bowman. they’re not going to be persuaded. but there’s a big bunch of primary voters who may not be following the war that closely, but they are loyal democrats. they like president biden, they’re interested in beating trump this fall, and they are susceptible to seeing ads about a guy who seems to be bucking the president, who’s out of the mainstream and not representing them. interesting. so an effective strategy from a group supporting israel is not necessarily to talk about israel in this campaign, but to talk about the way that a democrat, jamaal bowman, in this case, is letting down his party’s president, is letting down his party, is basically being disloyal to the democratic party, not necessarily israel. yes. and so far, from what we can tell, it seems to be pretty effective. explain that. so when i’m out in the district talking to voters, a really interesting thing has started happening. many of them, when i asked them their views on latimer and bowman, start quoting back to me or citing facts that are very prominently being featured in these commercials. now, often, they think it’s their own idea, but in political advertising, this is a sign of real success. voters are thinking about infrastructure. they’re thinking about loyalty. they’re thinking about bowman as a chaos agent. and i don’t think it’s an accident that they’re thinking about those things. it’s not an accident because they’re getting those views, you’re suggesting, from these now ubiquitous ads. exactly. so ubiquitous that some households are getting dozens of mailers a week reinforcing these points, and some of these aipac ads have been viewed upwards of 180 million times. wow. 180 million. i mean, astonishing. it’s complete saturation. what you’re describing here is anecdotal reporting that you’ve done in the district. what are the polls telling us about the state of this race between bowman and latimer? there has not been as much credible polling in this race as we would like. but what we have seen in polls that have come out is that latimer has opened up a very large lead, double digits. and while it’s hard to exactly attribute cause and effect here, i think everyone would agree that if you spend $15 million is going to have an impact on the way voters think and eventually poll on the ballot. right. a.k.a. these ads do seem to be very much hurting jamaal bowman. they’re certainly not helping. ok. what does bowman have to say about the fact that he has become the target of a group like aipac in this race? bowman’s response has been really interesting because where other politicians, i think, faced with this set of circumstances want to get reelected, might kind pull back or moderate some of their harshest positions, bowman has totally stood firm where he is, and he has actually leaned in to the aipac ads and made aipac a central point of his campaign, arguing that they are the representation of everything that’s wrong with big money in american politics, that they’re coming in and have basically not only bought his opponent, but are now trying to buy an election. and by the way, they may be a bipartisan group, but they’re doing it with big checks from republican mega donors. and they’re coming after me not just because of my position on israel, but because those donors don’t like the other things i stand for, the progressive values, my outspokenness as a black man. he’s really made this a kind of referendum, in his words, of the money versus the many. and by what he means by that is all this money versus the people who don’t have that much money that are fighting against entrenched corporate interests. he’s basically taking it back to his original 2020 democratic primary when he was running on a message of me versus the establishment. exactly. and he says the establishment never liked me. and this strategy has really worked to kind of galvanize the national progressive movement. they’ve really rallied around him. they’ve donated money. groups like justice democrats have emptied their bank accounts to try and save him. what’s up? what’s up? what’s up? and all of this came together this past weekend at a rally in the bronx. what’s up, new york? where representative ocasio cortez and bernie sanders joined bowman and a bunch of other progressives, some of whom flew in from as far away as florida. and bowman was really fired up. and because they see the power of our movement, they are spending more money than has ever been spent in american history, y’all. he framed it as if their whole movement was on the line. aipac is scared to death. we are not going to stand silent while us tax dollars kills babies and women and children. and profanely, again and again, ripped into aipac and what they’re doing in this race. people ask me why i got a foul mouth. what am i supposed to do? you coming after me. you coming   i just want to say, michael, because i was there, bowman very well may keep this seat. but the man on that stage was certainly acting like he was up against the wall and had nothing to lose. he was letting it all rip. nothing that aipac can do is going to stop our liberation. nothing. they have already lost nick, if bowman does lose   and we have to be really clear on the iffiness of that question. it’s a summer primary. turnout’s going to be, who knows. we’re in the middle of a heat wave here. the polling has been kind of subpar. but if bowman loses, i have to imagine aipac will claim this as a big victory for its cause. will say, we have made an example of this member of congress. but taking out a lawmaker, i have to think, is very different than rebuilding a consensus around support for israel, which is aipac’s real goal, isn’t it? absolutely. this is such an important point, michael, because as we’ve said, aipac’s real goal here is to maintain or reinstate a consensus support for israel in the united states. and that has to do with both who’s in congress and who the people electing them are. and you can take people out of congress, and they may succeed in taking out bowman. they may succeed later this summer in another primary in missouri in taking out representative cori bush. another member of the squad. exactly. but if they’re not changing the minds of the people who elect them, if they’re not actually running ads that are trying to change those people’s minds or running candidates that are trying to change those people’s minds, who’s to say that in the future, when circumstances are different or candidates don’t have the flaws that bowman maybe did, that those voters aren’t just going to keep electing more politicians that aipac doesn’t like. and it seems to me that in this race, not only have they missed an opportunity to try and move voters in the direction they want, they may actually be spawning a bigger backlash that could cause them further problems down the line. the very people that they’re trying to win back, i think, have only seen their distrust for aipac grow. right, and perhaps, by proxy, israel itself. exactly. and in the long term, that seems to make the problem worse, not better. but at the same time, for aipac, a win is a win. and they seem to be saying that they are willing to let that longer term battle over democratic hearts and minds play out another day, because right now they have a much more urgent question and problem in front of them, and that is the war that’s going on with hamas and the need for american military aid. and so the composition of this congress matters a lot to israel right now, and it matters a lot to aipac. and a defeat of somebody like jamaal bowman not only takes out one of their critics, but it sends a message to everybody else in congress who may be considering voting to cut off aid or criticizing israel in other ways, that you’re either with us or we’re coming after you next. and that chilling effect for aipac may be the most important victory of all. [music playing] well, nick, thank you very much. always a pleasure, michael. [music playing] we’ll be right back. here’s what else you need to know today. julian assange, the founder of wikileaks, has agreed to plead guilty to a single felony count of illegally obtaining and disclosing us national security material in exchange for his release from a british prison where he spent more than five years. the deal would end assange’s long standoff with the us, which began after he released highly sensitive american secrets, including documents about military activity in iraq and afghanistan and confidential cables shared among diplomats. under the deal, assange will serve no additional prison time. and, for the first time, the supreme court has agreed to decide the constitutionality of state laws banning medical treatments for transgender youth. the court will examine a tennessee law that prohibits three types of transgender medical care for minors, puberty blockers, cross sex hormones, and gender transition surgeries. its ruling, expected next year, could have broad ramifications for the roughly two dozen states that have enacted similar bans. today’s episode was produced by jessica cheung and mooj zadie. it was edited by liz o baylen with help from rachel quester, contains original music by marion lozano, rowan niemisto, dan powell, with sound design by elisheba ittoop, and was engineered by chris wood. our theme music is by jim brunberg and ben landsverk of wonderly. [music playing] that’s it for “the daily.” i’m michael barbaro. see you tomorrow. transcript this transcript was created using speech recognition software. while it has been reviewed by human transcribers, it may contain errors. please review the episode audio before quoting from this transcript and email transcripts@nytimes.com with any questions. from “the new york times,” i’m michael barbaro. this is “the daily.” [theme music] a powerful group supporting israel is trying to defeat sitting members of congress who have criticized the country’s deadly war against hamas. in today’s democratic primary in new york, it appears that strategy may work. my colleague, nick fandos, explains. it’s tuesday, june 25. nick, by the time people listen to this episode, voting will have begun in this congressional race that democrats across the country are watching really closely, because in a way, it feels like it’s become a test of what a democrat in office in congress can or can’t say about the war in gaza. so let’s start at the beginning with the congressman who is at the center of this race. so we’re talking here about congressman jamaal bowman. he represents the district just north of new york city. that includes parts of the bronx and cities like yonkers and mount vernon, but also suburbs like larchmont and scarsdale. he’s a former middle school principal, lifelong educator who was never in politics until 2019 and 2020, when he decided, i’m going to take on a big, powerful incumbent in my district. why run for congress? the simple answer is i want to do everything in my power to meet the needs of my students and families beyond the classroom. and he did it from the left. when you look throughout the district, you see pockets of the district where poverty is higher than 20 percent. you see pockets where the rent burdens are as high as 57 percent, while another parts of the district, you see incredible wealth and incredible affluence and incredible opportunity. so remember, this was right at the height of the covid pandemic. the election actually took place in the weeks after the killing of george floyd, and the whole country was up in arms. it was really thinking about race and equity, was thinking about power and whether the united states was moving quickly enough towards the goals that it professes to have. i want to put my run for congress on the side for a moment and just speak to you as a black man in america and as someone who’s lived there his entire life. and bowman was really able to capture that energy as a younger black man who was not in politics, speaks like a real person. i never saw anyone that looked like me, that sounded like me, that came from the places that i’ve come from, that spoke the language that mattered to me. for bowman, the race was about race and policing and donald trump and the feeling that the democratic party was not fighting hard enough, fast enough on all of these issues. i never saw anyone centering poverty and the working class and immigrants and those who are most vulnerable in our country. and his slogan was jobs and education, not bombs and incarceration. thank you so much. my name is jamaal bowman. i’m running for congress in this district, the 16th district. please go out and vote, and thank you for considering us as your next congressman. now, his opponent, eliot engel, was in his 70s. he’d been in congress more than 30 years. wow. he’s a committee chairman who was definitely more moderate than bowman. so in a sense, this becomes a perfect distillation of the outsider versus the establishment insider at a moment like you just said, where that is the question of the moment. exactly. and bowman was really able to capitalize on a couple of instances where engel looked out of touch. in one case, he was caught having stayed in washington for the early weeks and months of the pandemic   instead of in his district?   far away from his district. yeah, far away from his district. and then when he does show up, he’s caught on a hot mic begging for a speaking slot at an event. there’s just too many folks here. if i didn’t have a primary, i wouldn’t care. say that again? if i didn’t have a primary, i wouldn’t care. no. don’t do that to me. we’re not going to do this. we’re not   saying something to the effect of, i wouldn’t care except i’ve got a primary. mm. right. i remember that moment. it was incredibly embarrassing because here’s a congressman already under fire for being mia from his district in the pandemic, saying, i need to talk at this news conference, not because i necessarily care, but because i’m in a primary battle against jamaal bowman and i need voters to see me speaking and to think that i care. right. that’s certainly what it looks like. and bowman, on the other hand, seems so in and of this moment that, come election day, he sails. he beats engel by double digits. and it’s received at the time as kind of proof of the left’s ascendancy. this is only a couple of years after alexandria ocasio cortez won her seat. the squad formed in washington, that far left group of lawmakers. right. and when bowman arrives in washington, he reinforces their ranks and adds to this kind of growing progressive bloc that, in the early days of the biden administration, seems to be exercising a lot of power. and one really emblematic moment where bowman and the squad try and flex their muscle is around president biden’s signature infrastructure bill. remember, this is a big trillion dollar program to build roads and bridges and replace lead pipes. and originally, there had been a democratic proposal to pair it with another bill more focused on climate change and some social policy that progressives really liked. and the two get split apart, and the left is really upset about that. so in order to try and get negotiating leverage to get that other climate bill passed, bowman and a bunch of the squad and other progressives vote against the infrastructure bill, vote against one of biden’s biggest legislative priorities. and say, it’s not that we’re against it, but we need to have both. so far, nick, all of this very much feels in keeping with the way bowman campaigned. he’s governing as the outsider progressive that he said he would be. yeah. i think that’s right. he’s pretty consistent and, frankly, is getting along all right in washington. i mean, some people don’t like those positions, but generally speaking, he’s in good standing. until two very consequential weeks last fall. and what happens in those two weeks? so let me just set the scene here. it’s late september. conservative republicans are pulling congress towards a government shutdown. they’re in on a saturday. things are a total mess. nobody knows if the government’s going to be able to pay its bills or find a solution. and in the middle of all of this, jamaal bowman is trying to rush to the capitol to get to a vote. he gets to a door that he usually expects to go out. it’s locked. he tries it. and then what does he do? he pulls a fire alarm. new york congressman jamaal bowman, the former school principal, caught red handed, pulling the fire alarm inside a house office building. it sends the capitol basically into chaos, becomes a two day news cycle. he’s a principal. in my schools we did fire drills. you know exactly what happens when you pull a fire alarm. all these national cameras are already paying attention, and now here’s this crazy sideshow. he violated the exact same law that january 6 defendants are being prosecuted for every single day, interrupting an official proceeding. he said after the fact that he was trying to open the door, but generally, you don’t pull a fire alarm to open a door. his explanation that he did this by accident, also false. it’s the reason that i’ve asked the house ethics committee to review this. and eventually bowman is actually charged and pleads guilty to a misdemeanor for a false fire alarm. listen, you know, i pulled the fire alarm. i did not do it to disrupt the court proceeding, like i said. i was trying to get out the door. i was rushing to a vote. i’m thankful that, you know, we have an agreement in place. i’m thankful in three months it’s going to be dismissed. and now let’s move on. he has to pay a fine and apologize, and so it’s just a real kind of black eye on his public image. right. embarrassing, ill advised, but at the end of the day, not anything that’s going to necessarily endanger his career. yeah. no, that’s right. i think if it had just been that alone, he gets past it. but almost exactly a week later is october 7. when hamas attacks, israel brutally, takes hostages, leaves 1,200 israelis dead, and really ushers in a new moment in american politics, and particularly for democrats, who have been divided on israel for quite a while. particularly this kind of the left wing squad from the rest of the party. and those divisions are just kind of blown up in the days and weeks after october 7. and bowman, of all people, throws himself right into the middle of the wreckage. we acknowledge the trauma and the pain and the fear. he condemns hamas’s attack on october 7, but then, just days later, calls for a ceasefire in the region, essentially saying israel should not defend itself. and that’s a position, i should note, by the way, that is way out ahead of president biden, who hadn’t even gone yet at that point to israel to give benjamin netanyahu that famous hug and say that the united states was standing with israel. you’re calling for some weird cease fire that isn’t going to accomplish anything other than hamas, give hamas, which is basically an isis organization, time to regroup and kill more jews. never say ever that i’m ok with the killing of jews. ever say that. ever, because no one   this is insane. now, from bowman’s point of view, this is consistent with the way that he views international politics. remember the no bombs part of his slogan? right. he wants israel here to not meet violence with violence, to find some sort of diplomatic or political solution. let me just be very clear. it’s one thing to support israel, which the us has always done and will continue to do. it’s another thing to never hold israel accountable for their behavior, whether it’s related to the occupation, the open air prison that is gaza, or the war crimes that are taking place right now during this siege. i mean, israel   bowman sees this as a clear moral case. i think he relates what’s happening in israel to the racial justice struggle in the united states that he’s familiar with, to the economic struggle. israel, to him, is a powerful nation that is not making good on its own promises as a democracy and is oppressing palestinians. the muslim community, the arab community, and palestinians receive that as erasure, and even further receive it as dehumanization. so it sounds like in this moment, bowman is becoming the public face of left wing congressional democrats’ wariness and skepticism of israel at an exceptionally sensitive moment. yes. and in the weeks that would follow, he goes there again and again and again. so he’s one of the first lawmakers not only to call for a ceasefire, but then to accuse israel of committing genocide in gaza once its counteroffensive begins. he begins calling for the united states to cut off all military aid to israel, which is one of its closest allies, in the middle of this war. saying basically american taxpayer dollars shouldn’t be going to bombs. at one point he’s caught on video saying that claims that hamas used sexual violence against women around october 7 is, quote, “propaganda.” later, he apologized for those remarks, and all of this really adds to bowman’s prestige on the left. he becomes a big figure, a galvanizing figure, really, in this energized anti war movement around gaza. but at the same time, he’s taking a huge political risk. his district, which, remember, is just north of new york city, is quite diverse. it’s got a big black and latino population. but it also is home to one of the largest jewish populations in the country, and many of his constituents in that community feel betrayed. and not only that. back in washington, pro israel groups who exercise a huge amount of power are furious at bowman. they look at everything that’s happening and they think, he’s got an election coming. we might be able to defeat him, and in so doing, make an example out of him. [music playing] we’ll be right back. [music playing] so, nick, tell us about this well funded effort by supporters of israel to try to make an example of congressman bowman. to answer that, michael, let’s take a little bit of a step back in time and talk about aipac, the american israel public affairs committee, which is a bipartisan group that’s been around for a long time, whose mission, really, is to advance israel’s interests in the united states. traditionally, they’ve had very strong relationships with presidents and legislative leaders in both parties. they’ve been really effective, frankly, at creating a consensus in congress and in washington more broadly to send military aid and defense to help protect israel in the middle east from its neighbors. they pay for lawmakers to travel to israel and see the country, and they’ve long endorsed candidates they see as friends of israel and even made small donations. and then more recently, they began to take much bigger overt political steps. a couple of years ago they formed a super pac for the first time, and they’re doing it because they’re watching that consensus that they worked so hard to build, start to crumble, and particularly on the left among young voters, and particularly young democratic voters and democratic voters of color who no longer see israel in the way that maybe their parents or grandparents generation did. and for aipac, the embodiment of that change is the squad. then october 7 happens and intensifies all of these dynamics, and aipac senses a real existential threat. and so they go and they survey the electoral landscape. they look at all the members of the squad and other progressives in congress who are critical of israel and are trying to change the american relationship to it. and they figure out, ok, where could we go in electorally? could we knock some of these people out? and how do they end up zeroing in on bowman, of all people? so beating incumbents is not the easiest thing to do. so in many cases, they look at some of their biggest critics, people like rashida talib or alexandria ocasio cortez, and they simply can’t find a viable challenger. these guys are smart. they’ve run political campaigns before. they don’t want to put good money up to bat and waste it. but bowman, they look at him and think, this guy is beatable. not only do they not like what he’s saying about israel, but in this case, they are able to find a primary challenger who is not only credible, but is deeply popular in the district. and who is that? i’m george latimer. the opponent is george latimer. i’ve served in my local city hall. i’ve served in the county and the state legislature, and now as westchester county executive to focus on getting results, not just rhetoric. a well known democratic fixture who first entered politics in the reagan era and now serves as the county executive of westchester county, which is the biggest county in the district. we’ve seen israel created 75 years ago as a valid country. it has a right to exist and it has a right to exist on defensible borders. and he’s also, importantly, staunchly pro israel. i think the israeli people need to see that they have a partner for peace, and they don’t see a partner for peace right now. a democrat, frankly, in the mold of that old consensus model, who is willing to stand by the united states ally, israel, through thick and thin. and i have taken the position for a legislator to take a future legislator is to work through your legislative bodies and try to influence the president in that fashion. so in the fall, he starts getting outreach from local rabbis and jewish leaders in the district to jump in. and aipac gives him some encouragement as well. so in a sense, aipac is helping to recruit latimer to run against bowman. right. and not only do they help to recruit him, but once he does get in the race and establishes, i’m a supporter of israel, they begin raising very large amounts of money directly for his campaign. and in time, their super pac starts spending far, far more to advance his candidacy. and what does it look like for aipac’s super pac to advance latimer’s candidacy in this primary? so since mid may, aipac’s super pac has spent upwards of $14.5 million in this race. that’s a lot of money that’s just over a month. yeah, it’s a huge amount of money. something like almost $17,000 an hour at one point. and if you add it all up, it’s actually not only more than aipac has ever spent in a single race, it’s more than any outside group, any super pac has ever spent in a house race. george latimer is putting people ahead of personal agendas and delivering real progressive results. so some of that money actually goes towards the positive ad, trying to improve latimer’s image as a good progressive who stands by president biden. george latimer will take on maga extremists and he’ll work with president biden to keep delivering progressive results. but most of it is reserved for attacks on bowman. here’s the deal. i used to be for jamaal bowman, but not anymore. bowman put his extreme ideology ahead of us. one of only six democrats to oppose the historic infrastructure bill. so they bring back that infrastructure vote, and the idea is basically to try and paint bowman as a disloyal democrat, somebody who’s attacking the president and is a chaos agent in washington. bowman called president biden a liar. jamaal bowman has his own agenda, and he’s hurting new york. now, notably, notice i have not mentioned israel, because none of these ads   at least none of the ones on tv   mention israel. why would that be? why would aipac, which is clearly in the business of protecting israel, run a bunch of tv ads against jamaal bowman, who they object to because of his views on israel, and not mention those views about israel in the ads? yeah. it’s a great question, and it’s one that’s inspired bowman and his supporters to be like, what gives? so from aipac’s point of view, the logic is that voters in the district who really care about israel, no matter which side they’re on, have probably already made up their mind about jamaal bowman. they’re not going to be persuaded. but there’s a big bunch of primary voters who may not be following the war that closely, but they are loyal democrats. they like president biden, they’re interested in beating trump this fall, and they are susceptible to seeing ads about a guy who seems to be bucking the president, who’s out of the mainstream and not representing them. interesting. so an effective strategy from a group supporting israel is not necessarily to talk about israel in this campaign, but to talk about the way that a democrat, jamaal bowman, in this case, is letting down his party’s president, is letting down his party, is basically being disloyal to the democratic party, not necessarily israel. yes. and so far, from what we can tell, it seems to be pretty effective. explain that. so when i’m out in the district talking to voters, a really interesting thing has started happening. many of them, when i asked them their views on latimer and bowman, start quoting back to me or citing facts that are very prominently being featured in these commercials. now, often, they think it’s their own idea, but in political advertising, this is a sign of real success. voters are thinking about infrastructure. they’re thinking about loyalty. they’re thinking about bowman as a chaos agent. and i don’t think it’s an accident that they’re thinking about those things. it’s not an accident because they’re getting those views, you’re suggesting, from these now ubiquitous ads. exactly. so ubiquitous that some households are getting dozens of mailers a week reinforcing these points, and some of these aipac ads have been viewed upwards of 180 million times. wow. 180 million. i mean, astonishing. it’s complete saturation. what you’re describing here is anecdotal reporting that you’ve done in the district. what are the polls telling us about the state of this race between bowman and latimer? there has not been as much credible polling in this race as we would like. but what we have seen in polls that have come out is that latimer has opened up a very large lead, double digits. and while it’s hard to exactly attribute cause and effect here, i think everyone would agree that if you spend $15 million is going to have an impact on the way voters think and eventually poll on the ballot. right. a.k.a. these ads do seem to be very much hurting jamaal bowman. they’re certainly not helping. ok. what does bowman have to say about the fact that he has become the target of a group like aipac in this race? bowman’s response has been really interesting because where other politicians, i think, faced with this set of circumstances want to get reelected, might kind pull back or moderate some of their harshest positions, bowman has totally stood firm where he is, and he has actually leaned in to the aipac ads and made aipac a central point of his campaign, arguing that they are the representation of everything that’s wrong with big money in american politics, that they’re coming in and have basically not only bought his opponent, but are now trying to buy an election. and by the way, they may be a bipartisan group, but they’re doing it with big checks from republican mega donors. and they’re coming after me not just because of my position on israel, but because those donors don’t like the other things i stand for, the progressive values, my outspokenness as a black man. he’s really made this a kind of referendum, in his words, of the money versus the many. and by what he means by that is all this money versus the people who don’t have that much money that are fighting against entrenched corporate interests. he’s basically taking it back to his original 2020 democratic primary when he was running on a message of me versus the establishment. exactly. and he says the establishment never liked me. and this strategy has really worked to kind of galvanize the national progressive movement. they’ve really rallied around him. they’ve donated money. groups like justice democrats have emptied their bank accounts to try and save him. what’s up? what’s up? what’s up? and all of this came together this past weekend at a rally in the bronx. what’s up, new york? where representative ocasio cortez and bernie sanders joined bowman and a bunch of other progressives, some of whom flew in from as far away as florida. and bowman was really fired up. and because they see the power of our movement, they are spending more money than has ever been spent in american history, y’all. he framed it as if their whole movement was on the line. aipac is scared to death. we are not going to stand silent while us tax dollars kills babies and women and children. and profanely, again and again, ripped into aipac and what they’re doing in this race. people ask me why i got a foul mouth. what am i supposed to do? you coming after me. you coming   i just want to say, michael, because i was there, bowman very well may keep this seat. but the man on that stage was certainly acting like he was up against the wall and had nothing to lose. he was letting it all rip. nothing that aipac can do is going to stop our liberation. nothing. they have already lost nick, if bowman does lose   and we have to be really clear on the iffiness of that question. it’s a summer primary. turnout’s going to be, who knows. we’re in the middle of a heat wave here. the polling has been kind of subpar. but if bowman loses, i have to imagine aipac will claim this as a big victory for its cause. will say, we have made an example of this member of congress. but taking out a lawmaker, i have to think, is very different than rebuilding a consensus around support for israel, which is aipac’s real goal, isn’t it? absolutely. this is such an important point, michael, because as we’ve said, aipac’s real goal here is to maintain or reinstate a consensus support for israel in the united states. and that has to do with both who’s in congress and who the people electing them are. and you can take people out of congress, and they may succeed in taking out bowman. they may succeed later this summer in another primary in missouri in taking out representative cori bush. another member of the squad. exactly. but if they’re not changing the minds of the people who elect them, if they’re not actually running ads that are trying to change those people’s minds or running candidates that are trying to change those people’s minds, who’s to say that in the future, when circumstances are different or candidates don’t have the flaws that bowman maybe did, that those voters aren’t just going to keep electing more politicians that aipac doesn’t like. and it seems to me that in this race, not only have they missed an opportunity to try and move voters in the direction they want, they may actually be spawning a bigger backlash that could cause them further problems down the line. the very people that they’re trying to win back, i think, have only seen their distrust for aipac grow. right, and perhaps, by proxy, israel itself. exactly. and in the long term, that seems to make the problem worse, not better. but at the same time, for aipac, a win is a win. and they seem to be saying that they are willing to let that longer term battle over democratic hearts and minds play out another day, because right now they have a much more urgent question and problem in front of them, and that is the war that’s going on with hamas and the need for american military aid. and so the composition of this congress matters a lot to israel right now, and it matters a lot to aipac. and a defeat of somebody like jamaal bowman not only takes out one of their critics, but it sends a message to everybody else in congress who may be considering voting to cut off aid or criticizing israel in other ways, that you’re either with us or we’re coming after you next. and that chilling effect for aipac may be the most important victory of all. [music playing] well, nick, thank you very much. always a pleasure, michael. [music playing] we’ll be right back. here’s what else you need to know today. julian assange, the founder of wikileaks, has agreed to plead guilty to a single felony count of illegally obtaining and disclosing us national security material in exchange for his release from a british prison where he spent more than five years. the deal would end assange’s long standoff with the us, which began after he released highly sensitive american secrets, including documents about military activity in iraq and afghanistan and confidential cables shared among diplomats. under the deal, assange will serve no additional prison time. and, for the first time, the supreme court has agreed to decide the constitutionality of state laws banning medical treatments for transgender youth. the court will examine a tennessee law that prohibits three types of transgender medical care for minors, puberty blockers, cross sex hormones, and gender transition surgeries. its ruling, expected next year, could have broad ramifications for the roughly two dozen states that have enacted similar bans. today’s episode was produced by jessica cheung and mooj zadie. it was edited by liz o baylen with help from rachel quester, contains original music by marion lozano, rowan niemisto, dan powell, with sound design by elisheba ittoop, and was engineered by chris wood. our theme music is by jim brunberg and ben landsverk of wonderly. [music playing] that’s it for “the daily.” i’m michael barbaro. see you tomorrow. hosted by michael barbaro featuring nicholas fandos produced by mooj zadie and jessica cheung edited by liz o. baylen with rachel quester original music by marion lozanorowan niemisto and dan powell sound design by elisheba ittoop engineered by chris wood a powerful group supporting israel is trying to defeat sitting members of congress who have criticized the country’s deadly war against hamas. nicholas fandos, who covers new york politics for the times, explains why it appears that strategy may work in today’s democratic primary in new york. nicholas fandos, who covers new york politics and government for the new york times. the american israel public affairs committee unleashed a record $14.5 million bid to defeat representative jamaal bowman, a critic of israel. what to know about mr. bowman’s bitter democratic primary race. there are a lot of ways to listen to the daily. here’s how. we aim to make transcripts available the next workday after an episode’s publication. you can find them at the top of the page. the daily is made by rachel quester, lynsea garrison, clare toeniskoetter, paige cowett, michael simon johnson, brad fisher, chris wood, jessica cheung, stella tan, alexandra leigh young, lisa chow, eric krupke, marc georges, luke vander ploeg, m.j. davis lin, dan powell, sydney harper, mike benoist, liz o. baylen, asthaa chaturvedi, rachelle bonja, diana nguyen, marion lozano, corey schreppel, rob szypko, elisheba ittoop, mooj zadie, patricia willens, rowan niemisto, jody becker, rikki novetsky, john ketchum, nina feldman, will reid, carlos prieto, ben calhoun, susan lee, lexie diao, mary wilson, alex stern, sophia lanman, shannon lin, diane wong, devon taylor, alyssa moxley, summer thomad, olivia natt, daniel ramirez and brendan klinkenberg. our theme music is by jim brunberg and ben landsverk of wonderly. special thanks to sam dolnick, paula szuchman, lisa tobin, larissa anderson, julia simon, sofia milan, mahima chablani, elizabeth davis moorer, jeffrey miranda, maddy masiello, isabella anderson, nina lassam and nick pitman. nicholas fandos is a times reporter covering new york politics and government. more about nicholas fandos

the pro israel lobby is effectively laundering campaign funds for republican megadonors into democratic primaries last night’s defeat of rep. jamaal bowman (d n.y.) by westchester county executive george latimer in the democratic primary was an undeniable victory by moderate democrats who sought to retake bowman’s seat   particularly in light of his alignment with the progressive wing of the party, and his sharp criticism of biden’s material support for israel’s war in gaza. but latimer’s win also provided the most dramatic proof of concept for a controversial new strategy by aipac, the country’s biggest pro israel lobby: using its super pac, united democracy project, to funnel millions of dollars in republican donor funds into a democratic primary. put another way, aipac effectively acted to launder campaign funds for republican megadonors into the democratic primary, where the spending was generally identified in media as “pro israel,” not “republican.” by election day, latimer aligned groups had outspent bowman’s backers by a margin of over seven to one, with udp leading the spending, injecting approximately $15 million to support latimer. most of udp’s money didn’t come from bowman’s district and much of it didn’t even come from within the democratic party. whatsapp founder and billionaire jan koum donated $5 million to the udp in this cycle, making him the udp’s single biggest funder, and the only instance in which koum’s money appears to have funded a super pac active in democratic primaries. other than the udp, koum is a down the line republican donor over the course of his political giving. in the less than three years he’s been an active political donor, kloum has spent over $18 million, including $10 million to a super pac supporting nikki haley’s presidential primary campaign and $1.35 million to the republican jewish coalition. other seven figure udp donors include home depot founder bernard marcus and hedge fund manager paul singer, two of the republican party’s biggest donors. while koum, singer, and marcus are all supporters of hawkishly pro israel u.s. policies   reflected in their philanthropy as well as political contributions   udp’s identity as a pro israel, aipac aligned, group has largely overshadowed the fact that republican donors spent heavily to defeat bowman. while bowman’s loss was clearly a setback for critics of aipac and for those questioning how providing largely unconditional military aid to israel benefits americans, it opens new uncertainties about the future of aipac’s influence within the democratic party. if aipac must continue to rely so heavily on republican megadonors to boost pro israel candidates, particularly within the democratic party’s own primaries, it may be symptomatic of a weakening pro israel consensus on the left side of the u.s. political spectrum requiring increasingly desperate attempts by aipac to assert influence, even going so far as to funnel republican donor money into democratic races. people watch the poll results during primary election night watch party for congressman jamaal bowman (d ny) in yonkers, new york, u.s., june 25, 2024. reuters/david 'dee' delgado for the first time, a u.s. president has dispensed with even the pretense of supporting a two state solution. president trump’s latest remarks   proposing the forced displacement of palestinians to jordan, egypt, and other arab nations   should not just be noted as another inflammatory statement. they are the final nail in the coffin of a policy washington has long claimed to uphold. his words make clear the two state solution is dead, and palestinian displacement isn’t a byproduct of american policy   it’s the goal. president trump’s comments came as he welcomed prime minister benjamin netanyahu as the first foreign visitor to the u.s. in his second term. white house press secretary karoline leavitt and national security advisor mike waltz characterized trump’s remarks as an example of his "creativity" and willingness to break from past approaches. at the press conference held with the prime minister, the president was asked, “you just said that you think all the palestinians should be relocated to other countries. does that mean that you do not support the two state solution?” to which the president responded, “it doesn't mean anything about a two state or a one state or any other state. it means that we want to have   we want to give people a chance at life. they have never had a chance at life because the gaza strip has been a hellhole for people living there. it's been horrible. hamas has made it so bad, so bad, so dangerous, so unfair to people… and i have to stress, this is not for israel, this is for everybody in the middle east    arabs, muslims    this is for everybody.” his avoidance of answering the question speaks volumes. the comments on the forced displacement of palestinians from gaza have rightly sparked shock and outrage for their blatant endorsement of ethnic cleansing, even as they are now being walked back and reframed as a mere humanitarian proposal. what’s been lost in the coverage of trump’s remarks is the deeper shift it signals: his proposal to occupy gaza   whether permanently or not remains unclear   and relocate two million people to egypt and jordan isn’t just logistically impossible; it’s a declaration that palestinian displacement is the goal, not the consequence, of u.s. policy. the insanity of “doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results” remains in the way policymakers and pundits still pound the table, insisting that a two state solution remains the official u.s. position   even as every action taken by successive administrations undermines that very possibility. decades of unconditional military aid, diplomatic cover for settlement expansion, and willful disregard for palestinian sovereignty have made clear that "two states" was never an actual policy   only a talking point meant to delay accountability. if nothing else, president trump’s bluntness should force an overdue reckoning. if the two state solution is dead   and by all practical measures, it is, then what comes next? the only path forward is the one that dares to address the reality on the ground: a one state solution, an end to occupation, and equal rights and freedom for palestinians. anything else is just more of the same   and we already know how that ends. statements from unnamed dod officials suggest that president donald trump is planning to withdraw u.s. troops from northeast syria. isis is largely degraded and regional states have pledged to carry on the fight, bashar al assad’s regime is gone, diplomatic outreach to the new leadership in damascus is underway, and iran’s proxy forces have taken a severe beating while losing unfettered access to the mediterranean via syria. there’s little reason why u.s. troops should remain in syria. critics of withdrawal argue that it could destabilize syria’s fragile peace and benefit isis, especially since thousands of potential isis fighters remain in camps administered by the syrian defense forces (sdf). these are real concerns and any withdrawal should be orderly and coordinated, encouraging diplomacy between washington’s kurdish partners (sdf), turkey, and damascus  but it should proceed. diplomacy between the sdf, damascus, and ankara could even be hindered if the sdf believe that u.s. troops will remain indefinitely. arguing for an indefinite u.s. troop presence in syria both overstates u.s. influence and ties troops to uncontrollable conditions. it also offers an opportunity to make diplomatic inroads into the new de facto government in damascus. syrians have taken back their country and washington should respond with diplomacy and sanctions relief rather than indefinite troop deployments. a responsible and timely withdrawal from syria aligns with u.s. national interests and should be part of a broader effort to reduce the u.s. military presence in regions lacking both international and domestic legal justification. we still don’t know for sure if there are north korean troops fighting in russia against ukrainian forces. perhaps we never will. but ukraine’s case for their presence was not made stronger by the sudden announcement on january 30 that they were gone. reports of north korean troops joining russia in the fight to expel ukrainian forces from the kursk region of russia emerged in october. the u.s. state department called their presence “a major escalation by russia.” nato secretary general mark rutte called it a "significant escalation." it was significant enough that it reportedly tipped the scales in favor of the biden administration granting permission to ukraine to fire u.s. supplied long range atacms missiles deeper into russian territory. such an extraordinary change in u.s. policy should justify the requirement for extraordinary proof. but, beyond the statements of american, ukrainian, and south korean officials, there is still no verifiable proof that north korean troops were ever actually fighting in russia. the case requires the establishment of motive. the u.s. says that the recruitment of north korean troops shows russia’s lack of manpower and desperation. "this is an indication that [putin] may be [in even] more trouble than most people realize," then  secretary of defense lloyd j. austin said in october. reports suggested that the north koreans supplemented troops in kursk so putin did not have to draw from the front lines in the donbas. but others say russia was able to bring in russian troops from less intense areas of the fighting. “according to ukrainian soldiers from different parts of the front, the russian troops reinforcing kursk were mainly pulled from kherson and zaporizhzhia,” yurri clavilier, a land analyst with the international institute for strategic studies, told the bbc in november. that story said 50,000 russian troops were amassed in the kursk region, but did not mention koreans among them. but u.s. intelligence says that it was north korea that offered their troops to fight in kursk, perhaps, as some have suggested, to acquire battlefield experience. they also say that putin “quickly embraced the idea.” the pentagon and nato claimed to have knowledge that the north korean troops were highly trained soldiers drawn from an elite unit called the storm corps, and claimed to know their battlefield movements. they also said the north koreans were disguised as russians   but they have not provided physical proof that they were ever there. the reported number of north korean troops in the kursk region before they reportedly left late last month has been steadily inflated, finally ballooning to 12,000. but aside from photos of captured soldiers the ukrainian government has claimed are proof, witnesses appear scarce. on november 25, the wall street journal reported that “ukrainian officials say 10,000 north korean troops have been deployed to the kursk region,” then added that “no soldiers who talked to the journal had encountered them in battle.” a week later, the bbc was still reporting that “despite weeks of reports suggesting that as many as 10,000 north korean troops have been sent to kursk to join the russian counter offensive, the soldiers we’ve been in contact with have yet to encounter them.” on january 11, ukrainian president volodomyr zelensky announced that ukraine had captured two north korean soldiers in kursk on jan. 9 and brought them to kiev where they were being questioned. no north korean soldiers had been caught before, zelensky explained, because “russian forces and other north korean military personnel usually execute their wounded to erase any evidence of north korea’s involvement in the war.” zelensky posted a photo of each of the captured north koreans, with one claiming, through interpreters, that he had been a member of the dprk army since 2021, and the other testifying in writing (since his jaw was injured) that he had been in a sniper reconnaissance unit since 2016. a brief video of the interrogation was released by ukraine's presidential press service, but the faces are blurred, the location blacked out, and the authenticity of the video has not been verified. anatol lieven, director of the eurasia program at the quincy institute for responsible statecraft, suggests the western media should request that kiyiv “produce these supposed north korean prisoners for journalists to interview. if they do, then the issue is proved. if not, it will be a strong indication that these prisoners do not in fact exist.” then, just days after the announcement of the capture, ukrainian and american officials announced that the north korean forces were gone. it was reported in the western and ukraine media as an embarrassment to both north korea and russia. the north koreans, in essence, had to be pulled off the front lines because they had sustained such heavy casualties. ukraine’s commander in chief, general oleksandr syrsky said that the number of north korean soldiers had been reduced by half. kim jong un, the bbc reported, had incurred “an extraordinarily high cost” for helping russian president vladimir putin push ukrainian forces out of kursk, and the russians had supposedly squandered the elite soldiers with a lack of coordination and by “sending them forth in waves across fields studded with land mines to be mowed down by heavy ukrainian fire.” there are inconsistencies in the story of their reported exit, too. on january 30, the new york times reported that according to ukrainian and american officials, north korean troops “have not been seen at the front for about two weeks.” the next day, cnn reported that, according to colonel oleksandr kindratenko, a spokesperson for the ukrainian military’s special operations forces, they have “not been observed for about three weeks.” but on january 22, bbc cited general syrsky as saying just that week that “north korean soldiers were posing a significant problem for ukrainian fighters on the front line.” syrsky said that “11,000 12,000 highly motivated and well prepared soldiers [were] conducting offensive actions.” that week began on january 19. but north korean troops were said not to have been seen since two to three weeks before january 30: that would be january 9 16. ukraine says the north korean troops had not been seen since 3 10 days before that. and cutting it awfully close, zelensky claimed that the two north korean soldiers were captured on january 9. but by january 31, cnn was already able to publish that the ukrainian military’s special operations forces had said that no north korean soldiers had been seen “for about three weeks.” american officials have kept that ambiguity open with the evidence free claim that “the decision to pull the north korean troops off the front line may not be a permanent one. it is possible that the north koreans could return after receiving additional training or after the russians come up with new ways of deploying them to avoid such heavy casualties.” so, that rabbit   if it is a rabbit   can be pulled out of the hat again if needed. if north korean troops really were in kursk, and they really were wasted and decimated, then their presence didn’t justify the escalatory risk of granting permission to ukraine to fire u.s. supplied long range missiles deeper into russian territory. if they really weren’t, then the whole affair was a sleight of hand to justify that decision. by subscribing to our recent updates, you will gain access to a wealth of valuable information, including breaking news, expert analysis, and thought provoking articles. whether you are interested in science, technology, business, health, or any other field, our updates will keep you informed and engaged. ©2025 quincy institute for responsible statecraft, inc. all rights reserved. ©2025 quincy institute for responsible statecraft, inc. all rights reserved.

with his victory, george latimer has unseated one of us congress' most liberal and outspoken critics of israel, jamaal bowman, who has accused israel of committing genocide in gaza. jamaal bowman becomes the first member of pro palestine leaders to lose 2024 primary as democrats divide over israel. / photo: reuters george latimer, a pro israel centrist, has defeated us representative jamaal bowman in a democratic primary in suburban new york that highlighted the party’s deep divisions over the war in gaza. with the victory, latimer has ousted one of the most liberal voices in congress and one of its most outspoken critics of israel. bowman has accused israel of committing genocide in gaza, where israel has killed tens of thousands of palestinians since october 7 last year. latimer, who into the race at the urging of jewish leaders upset with bowman's criticism of israel, is a former state legislator who has served as westchester county executive since 2018. in a victory speech, latimer called for more civility following the contentious race. bowman had been seeking a third term, representing a district in new york city’s northern suburbs. his defeat is a blow to the party’s progressive wing and a potential cautionary tale for candidates trying to shape their messaging around israel's war on gaza. trying to buy the race the american israel public affairs committee's (aipac) political action committee spent nearly $15 million on the primary, filling airwaves and mailboxes with negative ads in an effort to unseat bowman, who has accused the influential pro israel lobbying group of trying to buy the race. some major progressive figures have rushed to bowman's defence. in the final stretch of the race, he rallied with liberals representative alexandria ocasio cortez and senator bernie sanders, while latimer pulled in the endorsement of former presidential candidate hillary clinton. on israel, both bowman and latimer support a two state solution. but bowman was one of a few progressives who rejected a symbolic house resolution in support of israel following the october 7 hamas raid. latimer firmly backs israel and said negotiating a ceasefire with hamas is a non starter because he believes it is not a resistance group. 'tool of pro israel groups' bowman was first elected in 2020 after running as a liberal insurgent against moderate us representative eliot engel, a 16 term congressman who chaired a house committee on foreign affairs. bowman, 48, embraced the political outsider strategy this year as well, depicting latimer as a tool of pro israel groups. the congressional district's boundaries have shifted since bowman first won office in 2020, losing most of its sections in the bronx and adding more of westchester county's suburbs. he spent the bulk of his election day in the bronx, too, and a video posted to the social media site x showed bowman walking down a street in the bronx with a drum line behind him on tuesday. latimer, 70, will be the prohibitive favourite to win in the general election. the district, which includes parts of westchester and a small piece of the bronx, is a democratic stronghold. nationally, democratic party leaders have emphasised moving toward centrist candidates who might fare better in suburban races. also on tuesday, democratic voters on long island picked former cnn anchor john avlon as the candidate who will challenge incumbent republican rep. nick lalota in a district that’s been controlled by the gop for a decade. avlon defeated retired chemistry professor nancy goroff in the democratic primary. the long island congressional district has become a priority for democrats as the party tries to flip suburban seats in new york as part of a strategy to win a house majority.

pro israel political groups have transformed a democratic primary on the outskirts of new york city, overwhelming the race with record shattering outside spending to take down one of israel’s most outspoken detractors, rep. jamaal bowman. the onslaught by the american israel public affairs committee and allied groups has made good on a warning delivered to lawmakers like bowman after hamas’ oct. 7 attack: moderate your views or face a deluge of political attacks. now, in barely a month, an aipac affiliated super political action committee has spent $14.5 million   up to $17,000 an hour   on the race, filling television screens, stuffing mailboxes and clogging phone lines with caustic attacks. with days to go, the expenditures have eclipsed what any interest group has ever spent on a single house race. pro israel groups are using the same approach elsewhere, most notably in an august primary in st. louis. aipac’s super pac, the united democracy project, has spent $1.5 million there to take out rep. cori bush, who is a black member of the house’s left wing “squad” like bowman. the paid messages almost never mention israel. in bowman’s race, they have favored attacks aimed at the party’s base portraying the congressman as a pariah who “keeps attacking president (joe) biden” and courts “controversy, chaos and conspiracy.” “jamaal bowman has his own agenda, and he’s hurting new york,” warns one tv spot. tracking firm adimpact estimates it has been seen 180 million times. the approach has infuriated bowman, an ally of the president, who argues that he is being punished for standing by a moral conviction against the israel hamas war, while his more moderate opponent, george latimer, wavers on key biden priorities like raising taxes. the extraordinary intervention has also galvanized a coalition of left leaning organizations to run their own influence campaign designed to discredit aipac, by stressing that the group receives substantial funding from republican megadonors and favors stances well to the right of their base. “i’m an outspoken person of color. i’m an outspoken black man. i fight against genocide in gaza, and i fight for justice right here,” bowman said during a debate this week with latimer. “and his supporters don’t want that because it challenges their power.” but with just days to go, aipac’s influence seems clear. polls indicate that latimer, who is white, has taken a commanding lead, and his pro israel backers are urging other democrats to take notice. “assuming the outcome is as we expect it, the message is going to be that being pro israel is not just wise policy, it’s smart politics,” said mark mellman, a democratic pollster whose democratic majority for israel spent $1 million against bowman. the congressman’s allies   and even some democrats rooting against him   worry that a defeat will set a more worrisome precedent. they fear that if it is successful, the spending could not only have a chilling effect on democrats willing to speak out against the war, but also offer a replicable strategy for other wealthy interests in both parties. “this is the message of this campaign: you stand up to powerful interests, they will try to bring you down,” said sen. bernie sanders, i vt., who was scheduled to campaign with bowman on friday. he added: “today, they’re in the democratic primary. tomorrow, they’ll be in the republican primary. they don’t care.” super pacs are nothing new in american politics. and they have become ever larger players since the supreme court began allowing outside groups to spend unlimited money, as long as they do not directly coordinate with candidates. but the scale and tactics of aipac and democratic majority for israel have few parallels. with the exception of those tied to the cryptocurrency industry, most other large super pacs capable of spending millions of dollars generally exist to advance either a particular candidate or a particular political party. aipac had been lobbying american politicians of both parties for decades, enjoying close ties to presidents and legislative leaders. it only formed its own super pac around the 2022 midterms. it spent $26 million that cycle, mostly targeting progressive democrats who in recent years had begun to pull their party toward a more critical view of israel. two years later, the war and israel’s tenuous position on the global stage has accelerated both trends. republicans like paul singer and bernard marcus have stepped up with multimillion dollar donations to aipac’s pac, as have some democrats. despite earlier threats, the group opted against a broad based attack on israel’s democratic critics. after struggling to identify viable challengers, it has chosen so far not to meaningfully challenge other israel critics, including reps. summer lee, rashida tlaib, ilhan omar and alexandria ocasio cortez. bowman, who represents a large jewish population, presented himself as the ideal target. although he condemned hamas’ oct. 7 attack, bowman was among the first lawmakers to call for a cease fire in the gaza strip, to accuse israel of committing genocide there and to push to curtail american military aid to israel   positions that aipac directly opposes. he was politically vulnerable, with relatively scant funds in his reelection account and a fresh misdemeanor charge for pulling a house fire alarm when there was no fire. and rather than back down in the face of aipac’s threats, he has only become more outspoken. in a recent speech, bowman said that he was being “attacked by the zionist regime we call aipac.” “this race offers an unambiguous choice,” said marshall wittmann, an aipac spokesperson. “george latimer is a progressive, pro israel candidate while jamaal bowman has refused to support the jewish state as it fights a moral and just war against iranian terrorist proxies.” after helping recruit latimer, the westchester county executive, aipac has served as his biggest bundler, steering more than $2.4 million directly into his campaign accounts, some of it from republican donors. then, in mid may, its super pac began to spend, saturating local television despite new york’s notoriously high advertising prices. by comparison, bowman and his allies from justice democrats and the working families party have managed to scrape together about $4 million altogether for advertising, less than a third of what united democracy project is spending. “this is an astronomical amount of spending in really any house race, let alone a democratic primary in new york,” said meredith kelly, who ran communications for the house democrats’ campaign arm. united democracy project put $3.2 million behind a positive tv ad buffing latimer’s image as a biden ally “delivering progressive results,” according to adimpact. the group has spent at least twice that on attack ads. produced by a veteran democratic advertising firm, they almost always mention bowman’s vote against biden’s infrastructure bill. bowman has said he opposed the legislation to pressure congress to pass companion climate change legislation, but on the airwaves, it is played as a betrayal. it appears that the only places that united democracy project paid for advertising related to israel were in web ads and glossy mailers that can be more easily targeted to voters. many cite information published by news media that democratic majority for israel now says it uncovered. the group said it paid researchers who found blog posts and videos showing bowman dabbling in conspiracy theories about sept. 11 and praising a writer many jews consider an antisemite, then shared them with reporters. (bowman has apologized, and says he is not prejudiced against any group.) “at the end of the day, super pacs like ours are in the business of winning the races we are engaged in, and we use the issues that work most effectively,” mellman said. as for latimer, he appears to have few qualms with the crush of money being used in his name. in a recent interview, he said he was in favor of changing laws to limit the influence of money in politics. but for now, he said he was just “following the rules of the game.” this article originally appeared in the new york times. enter your information below to receive our weekly newsletters with the latest insights, opinion pieces and current events straight to your inbox. property of: nees kathimerines ekdoseis single member s.a. © 2014   2025 powered by

aipac, israel’s largest us lobbying group, made this race the most expensive house primary in history. rep. jamaal bowman (d new york) lost his primary on tuesday after israel’s largest u.s. lobbying group made his race the most expensive house primary in history, pouring nearly $15 million to oust one of the few progressive critics of israel in congress as the country carries out a horrific genocidal assault in gaza. as of wednesday morning, bowman had garnered 42 percent of the vote, compared to 58 percent for his opponent, businessman and local politician george latimer, a vocal supporter of israel. ap called the race on tuesday night. the american israel public affairs committee’s (aipac) super pac, united democracy project, had poured a record $14.5 million into defeating bowman   the most a single group has ever spent on a house race. this amounted to over half a million dollars every day, or about $17,000 every hour, to oust a single lawmaker in a chamber that already has a near consensus majority of israel supporters. together, three super pacs   united democracy project, the democratic majority for israel and pro cryptocurrency group fairshake   spent $18 million to defeat bowman. “we should not be well adjusted to a sick society,” bowman said in his concession speech. “we should be outraged. we should be outraged when a super pac of dark money can spend $20 million to brainwash people into believing something that isn’t true. we should be outraged about that.” “this will be a battle about our humanity and justice for the rest of our lives,” he said. fellow progressive “squad” members like rep. alexandria ocasio cortez (d new york), who handily won her primary election on tuesday, had backed bowman and criticized corruption of aipac and its historic ability to buy primary wins to defeat progressive candidates. aipac had previously tried to offer multiple people in michigan $20 million to oust rep. rashida tlaib (d), the only palestinian american in congress. as progressives and bowman himself have noted, the race wasn’t just about bowman versus latimer   the latter of whom made a number of brazenly racist comments in recent weeks   but rather, bowman and progressive, pro palestine lawmakers versus aipac and the power of the dark money allied political establishment. further, it was not just a race about pro  or anti zionist ideologies, but also about moneyed interests hacking away at the small progressive coalition in congress, commentators noted. indeed, a number of latimer’s donors were republicans who had also spent money to support other pro israel candidates in recent races. bowman’s loss is thus a bad sign for progressives, and a good sign for aipac and other groups seeking to oust progressive lawmakers, who now have a strong test case for the strategy of pouring a huge cache of money into a race in order to secure a win. democratic leaders had declined to back bowman in his race despite their supposed vow to support democratic incumbents   a vow that only seems to be invoked when it’s used against progressive candidates, as it was when bowman was first elected in 2020, when he primaried a centrist democrat to become the first black person to represent his district. advocates for palestinian rights called for democrats to recognize the vast power that aipac has over politics and reject their influence. “the progressive policies that congressman bowman is fighting for, including unapologetic support for palestinian rights, are so popular that aipac and other corporate super pacs had to spend more money than has ever been spent in a congressional primary in order to win,” said jewish voice for peace action political director beth miller in a statement. “it is long past time for the democratic party leadership to catch up to its base and reject aipac.” next in aipac’s crosshairs is rep. cori bush (d missouri), a strong supporter of palestinian rights who had first introduced legislation calling for a ceasefire in gaza in october. united democracy project has already spent $2 million on bush’s primary election, which will take place in august. as donald trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: tell the truth more loudly than ever before. do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. and do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void   we’re reaching out to real people amid a life threatening political climate. our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit. as a dizzying number of corporate news organizations   either through need or greed   rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media makers to double down on community first models. at truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: we won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. we recognize the implications for democracy when information seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. the laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths   a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government. over 80 percent of truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice oriented foundations. over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep truthout barrier free for everyone. you can help by giving today. whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, truthout only works with your support. sharon zhang is a news writer at truthout covering politics, climate and labor. before coming to truthout, sharon had written stories for pacific standard, the new republic, and more. she has a master’s degree in environmental studies. she can be found on twitter and bluesky. get the news you want, delivered to your inbox every day. as we rise to meet an era of unchecked right wing authority, we urgently appeal for your support. will you start a monthly donation to truthout today?

forgot your password? their astonishing spending mattered less than how the congressman’s jewish constituents weighed his words and actions. the american israel public affairs committee (aipac) is absolutely slaphappy about jamaal bowman’s defeat on tuesday, claiming as much credit as it can for spending an eye popping $14.5 million to elect george latimer to congress. given the group’s repeated failure to knock out members of the squad, they’ve long been desperate for a win, but they overpaid for bragging rights. way back in january, well before aipac even spent a dime, the latimer campaign had internal polls showing him up 10 points over the incumbent: that’s a massive lead for a non incumbent, which testifies to bowman’s weaknesses. latimer later won by 17 points. what really made the difference in the race were jewish voters themselves: people who live in the district, some of whom voted for bowman previously, some of whom did not the majority of whom could not stomach his rhetoric around the war in gaza, exacerbated by an indifference bordering on hostility to their fears and feedback. it’s easy to blame bowman’s loss primarily on aipac, but that would be as misleading as it is for them to claim credit. the real story here is much more straightforward and sad. there are about 130,000 jews in westchester, representing 9 percent of the population, who typically account for 20 percent of the vote. this year they reached 24 percent, with more than 50 percent of the mail in vote coming from likely jewish constituents, thanks in large part to a gotv operation called westchester unites. westchester unites identified a universe of 27,000 likely jewish democrats, focusing on those who had voted in one of the last four primaries, casual voters rather than prime voters. it then ran an aggressive organizing campaign to turn out a staggering 15,000 jewish voters, among them approximately 2,000 republicans and independents whom it re registered as democrats an underhanded and ultimately unnecessary move given latimer’s margin of victory. however, as a 501(c)(3), westchester unites was expressly forbidden from pushing a candidate. it canvassed, phone banked, and sent mailers full of information about how to vote without any mention of a candidate, and organized throughout the 40 jewish institutions in the district, across religious denominations. its main message was “antisemitism is on the ballot,” betting that jews would do their own research and find bowman’s words and actions sufficiently motivating. a non exhaustive list: describing the war in gaza as a “genocide,” a term that bernie sanders has explicitly resisted; disputing that the attack was unprovoked; using the settler colonialism framework that posits jews as non indigenous interlopers in a land they have no claim to; praising well known jewish provocateur norman finkelstein, whose book the holocaust industry accuses jews of exploiting the holocaust and promotes conspiracy theories (he later apologized); generally promoting or aligning with groups and people who celebrated october 7 as “resistance”; characterizing jewish settlement patterns in westchester as segregated; using “zionist” as a pejorative. these are not people aipac “controls,” as bowman described the group’s grip on congress, although voters most certainly saw their web ads, which featured truly ugly footage of bowman denying that hamas raped israeli women on october 7 (he eventually apologized, sort of). presumably, these voters were scared and offended by what they heard from bowman, and voted accordingly. this is where the institutional left needs to do some serious self criticism. the explicitly anti zionist jewish voices for peace and the jewish vote the 501(c)(4) arm of jews for racial and economic justice, which counts 500 members in ny16 are simply not representative of the majority of jewish voters. and it’s not because that majority are “aipac voters” or “pro genocide” as representative ilhan omar slandered jewish students at columbia who were not part of the encampments. polling repeatedly shows that most jews in america support a two state solution, an end to the war, the hostages returned home, and netanyahu out of power positions well represented by the liberal zionist organization j street. bowman lost j street’s endorsement and jewish voters who’d previously supported him not only because he moved away from this position but also because he flirted with and then fully ingratiated himself to a section of the left that does not believe in israel’s right to exist at all, often bleeding into an antisemitism that i’ve written about extensively. bowman went deep down this spiral when he could’ve more easily faced his voters if he’d stuck to a substantive critique of us foreign policy. maxwell frost (d fl), who campaigned with bowman in the bronx, describes himself as “pro israel and pro palestine,” and managed to unequivocally condemn hamas while cosponsoring a resolution calling for a cease fire as early as october. he is neither a favorite of aipac nor beloved by hardline pro palestine activists who demonstrated against him at a concert. conditioning aid to israel sounds completely reasonable when it isn’t wrapped in rhetoric about settler colonialism, and extended lectures from non jews and the minority of jews who agree with them about weaponizing antisemitism. by framing the race as a proxy battle with the “zionist regime we call aipac,” bowman ended up treating jewish voters in the district as if they themselves were foreign to it, as opposed to people with legitimate concerns about his representation of their concerns. as one jewish, j street aligned former bowman supporter put it in a recent huffpost story: “he created alliances that shouldn’t be created. i shouldn’t be allying with an aipac candidate.” things veered into hypocrisy when bowman rallied outside of the district with bernie sanders and alexandria ocasio cortez arguing that right wing billionaires were trying to buy the district, when only 10 percent of his own contributions came from within. bowman is not an antisemite. the problem is that antisemitism is a conspiracy theory, and it turns out that bowman is a little conspiracy curious which makes it easy to find himself spouting the kind of rhetoric that sounds warning bells for many jews. aipac is a single issue organization that lobbies congress and spends obscene amounts of money to influence elections on the only issue it cares about: unconditional support for israel’s current government (which for nearly 20 years has meant the corrupt, racist, expansionist netanyahu regime). that means happily backing the january 6 insurrectionists, among others, so long as they toe the line on israel. this has a corrosive effect on our democracy that’s unambiguously bad but not uniquely evil. contrary to bowman’s claim that “they oppose the working class, multiracial, multieconomic, multicultural democracy that we are trying to build,” aipac really just cares about israel. building it up into an all powerful front against all things good doesn’t help progressives, palestinians, or the jews who support them. also considering how much aipac loses, turning it into an all powerful boogeyman only redounds to its benefit. so, too, the attempt to retrofit latimer into a racist running a southern strategy, rather than talking more about his indefensible refusal to raise taxes on the rich. latimer made plenty of cringeworthy comments about race, but he just wasn’t monster material. it mostly made bowman seem disconnected from the reality on the ground. local black leaders endorsed latimer in mount vernon and yonkers, where he seems to won handily. i’m not happy about any of this. i grew up in the non riverdale, bronx portion of the district bowman first won before it was redrawn, and he would’ve been my candidate (i’ve also defended him in the nation). there are 50 latimers already serving in congress, and he will neither stand up to the netanyahu government nor represent the 25 percent of the district that is black better than bowman. but it is bowman’s mistake to think that he lost because aipac was able to “brainwash people into believing something that isn’t true,” as he said in his concession speech. the jewish voters who could not support him are not mindless drones, and neither are the vast majority of non jewish voters who contributed to his 60 40 loss. at some level he and the movement that supported him has to own that. alexis grenell is a columnist for the nation. she is a political consultant who writes frequently about gender and politics. while the lawsuits being filed against the trump musk administration are righteous, they will not “save” us from this nightmare. elie mystal over the coup coup nest. steve brodner illegal raids at workplaces, schools, and churches are instilling fear in the most vulnerable communities, but immigrant resistance is growing stronger. oppart / andrea arroyo trump and his white nationalist allies are pursuing a shock and awe strategy against immigrants and many democrats seem all too eager to join him. gaby del valle attacked by the right for noting that musk and trump don't have monarchical powers, the member of congress refers her critics to the nation's founding document. john nichols you know things are bad when you end up nostalgic for trump's first term. sasha abramsky

trump administration supported by the deluge in outside spending, which also includes another $1 million from another pro israel group, threatens to sink representative jamaal bowman. by nicholas fandos pro israel political groups have transformed a democratic primary on the outskirts of new york city, overwhelming the race with record shattering outside spending to take down one of israel’s most outspoken detractors, representative jamaal bowman. the onslaught by the american israel public affairs committee and allied groups has made good on a warning delivered to lawmakers like mr. bowman after hamas’s oct. 7 attack: moderate your views or face a deluge of political attacks. now, in barely a month, an aipac affiliated super pac has spent $14.5 million   up to $17,000 an hour   on the race, filling television screens, stuffing mailboxes and clogging phone lines with caustic attacks. with days to go, the expenditures have already eclipsed what any interest group has ever spent on a single house race. pro israel groups are using the same approach elsewhere, most notably in an august primary in st. louis. aipac’s super pac, the united democracy project, has already spent $1.5 million there to take out representative cori bush, who is a black member of the house’s left wing “squad” like mr. bowman. the paid messages almost never mention israel. in mr. bowman’s race, they have favored attacks aimed at the party’s base portraying the congressman as a pariah who “keeps attacking president biden” and courts “controversy, chaos and conspiracy.” “jamaal bowman has his own agenda, and he’s hurting new york,” warns one tv spot. the tracking firm adimpact estimates it has been seen 180 million times.

super pac has run ads opposing the congressman and supporting his opponent as he criticizes israel’s military campaign in gaza a super pac affiliated with the american israel public affairs committee (aipac) has revved up its campaign spending, pouring $2m into a new york congressional primary to oppose the progressive incumbent jamaal bowman. campaign finance disclosures released this weekend showed the super pac, called united democracy project (udp), spending about $1m in support of bowman’s opponent, the moderate democrat george latimer and $1m in negative advertisements opposing bowman. if the group succeeds in defeating bowman, it will deliver a significant blow to the progressive wing of the house. “they don’t want israel to be criticized, they don’t want israel to be held accountable   they don’t want anyone to mention palestine or speak up for palestinian rights and lives,” said bowman during an interview with msnbc on saturday. in comparison, progressive groups including justice democrats and working families party have spent less than $300,000 in support of bowman and opposing latimer. latimer’s campaign has similarly outpaced bowman’s in fundraising, with latimer garnering more than $3.6m and bowman raising about $2.6m so far. in an email to the guardian, an aipac spokesperson previously described latimer as “a strong advocate for the us israel relationship in clear contrast to his opponent who is aligned with the anti israel extremist fringe”. bowman has sharply criticized israel’s military campaign in gaza and was among the first of his colleagues to call for a ceasefire. notably, ads countering bowman do not mention israel at all. one ad from udp accuses bowman of having “his own agenda”, highlighting policy differences between the congressman and joe biden. the heavily democratic contested district, with large numbers of black, jewish and latino constituents, elected the progressive “squad” member bowman in 2020 in an upset primary election in 2020. aipac’s forays into campaigns represent a new avenue of political activism for the pro israel lobbying group, which until the 2022 election cycle did not spend on campaigns. by forming a super pac, which can legally contribute unlimited amounts of money on advertisements and communications in races, aipac has been able to ramp up its influence. aipac planned to spend $100m on campaigns this year and has so far targeted a wide and at times unexpected range of races   with mixed results. in an indiana congressional primary, udp spent $1.6m in a successful bid to stop the former republican congressman john hostettler, an isolationist leaning republican who in the past made antisemitic remarks, from regaining a seat in the house. in a maryland race, the super pac threw its support behind the democratic candidate sarah elfreth, who beat the former us capitol police officer harry dunn. neither dunn, whose book about the january 6 attack propelled him to national prominence, or elfreth, a maryland state senator, made comments about israel gaza during the race. but candidates backed by pro israel groups have not succeeded in every race so far this year   udp also dropped $4.6m in a failed bid to stop the democratic congressional candidate dave min from advancing in his primary race against democratic candidate joanna weiss.

leftwing groups write to top house democrat hakeem jeffries raising ‘dire concerns’ about pro israel lobby group progressive groups reacted with disappointment and anger over jamaal bowman’s decisive primary loss to a moderate democrat in new york’s 16th district, calling for the party to cut ties with pro israel lobbying groups they blame for the result. in a letter to the house democratic leader, hakeem jeffries, more than a dozen progressive organizations said they had “dire concerns” over the party’s continued association with the american israel public affairs committee (aipac), “the future of the democratic party, the future of our multiracial democracy, and the future of our planet”. aipac and its affiliates plan to spend $100m across the election cycle, and bowman’s defeat marks their most significant victory to date. looking ahead, they have already set their sights set on the missouri congresswoman cori bush, who will face wesley bell in her august primary. united democracy project, a super pac affiliated with aipac, has already spent nearly $1.9m promoting bell’s candidacy. the signatories of the letter included the center for popular democracy action, jewish voice for peace action, new york communities for change and new york city democratic socialists of america. in the letter, they said that in the run up to the vote, udp had flooded the westchester county northern bronx district with nearly $20m in mailers and ads “funded largely by republican billionaires, to drown out jamaal bowman’s message of humanity, dignity, and a thriving future for all”. the result, they said, had been to unseat a a candidate that jeffries had personally endorsed, who retains “a deep well of support among the black and brown communities in the district”, and to replace him with “a conservative politician with a history of racist remarks and governance”. bowman, a black former middle school principal who has been an outspoken critic of israel’s conduct in gaza, lost to challenger george latimer by a wide margin of 58% to 42% of the vote. the race was called within an hour of polls closing. bowman had been supported on the campaign trail by heavyweight party progressives, including alexandria ocasio cortez and the vermont senator bernie sanders, who called the race “one of the most important in the modern history of america”. sanders said in a statement after bowman’s loss that it was “an outrage and an insult to democracy that we maintain a corrupt campaign finance system which allows billionaire funded super pacs to buy elections.” “aipac and other super pacs spent over $23 million to defeat bowman. he spent $3 million. that is a spending gap which is virtually impossible to overcome,” he said, adding: “it is not a coincidence that with our corrupt campaign finance system we also have a rigged economy that allows the very rich to get much richer while many working people are falling further behind. big money buys politicians who will do their bidding, and the results are clear.” progressives, like sanders, attempted to characterize the race as an example of big money influence in politics after pro israel groups and a number of wealthy residents of the new york suburban parts of the district weighed in with their checkbooks. bush underscored that latimer’s victory represented a clear threat to the progressive movement, saying in a statement: “these same extremists are coming to st louis. they are bankrolling a faux progressive, former republican campaign operative to buy our deep blue democratic seat. but let me be clear: st louis will not be silenced or sold out.” the progressive groups said that aipac had “turned the ny16 race into the most expensive democratic primary in history, waging an unacceptable assault on our democracy, our communities, and our shared future” and called on jeffries to take action against “destructive actions in your own backyard”. jeffries, along with most of the house democratic leadership team, has received aipac’s endorsement, and the progressive groups demanded that he reject the pro israel lobby group’s financial support to protest against bowman’s defeat. protect our power said in a statement that bowman’s defeat was a “loss for young people and anyone who cares about our continued movement toward justice, peace, and building a multiracial democracy”. the progressive group blamed “aipac and the maga billionaires who recruited and paid for george latimer’s campaign from start to finish” for the defeat, and vowed “to tell aipac they have no business creating division in our democracy”. in a separate letter of protest, jewish voice for peace action said it was “saddened” by the results that had unseated a congressman who “has been one of the few members of congress committed to defending palestinian human rights”. “today is a sad day for american democracy,” said jvp’s political director, beth miller. “to protect progressive candidates moving forward it is essential that democrats reject aipac,” she added. bob herbst, a member of the group and a constituent of ny 16, called aipac’s multimillion dollar spend in the district “a dangerous interference in our democracy”. the race had been viewed as a crucial test of democratic party unity over an issue that threatens to separate traditionally democratic voting jewish americans from the party in the aftermath of hamas’s 7 october attack on israel that killed nearly 1,200 people, and a nine month israeli counter offensive that has killed more than 37,000 palestinians and driven hundreds of thousands more to the point of starvation. bowman claimed that the results would show “fucking aipac the power of the motherfucking south bronx”, though the aipac campaign focused primarily on bowman’s weaknesses overall and not specifically or solely his stance on israel. one udp attack ad against bowman specifically called out his votes against the bipartisan infrastructure bill and the debt ceiling agreement, accusing the representative of failing his constituents. “jamaal bowman has his own agenda and refuses to compromise, even with president biden,” the ad’s narrator says. “jamaal bowman has his own agenda, and it’s hurting new york.” nonetheless, aipac is using latimer’s victory to claim that bowman’s stance on israel is why he lost. “this race presented a clear choice   between george latimer, who reflects the views of the democratic mainstream in his congressional district and across the country, and his opponent, who aligns with the extremist, anti israel fringe,” an aipac spokesperson, marshall wittmann, told axios. bowman was no stranger to scandals while in office. in december 2023, he became the 27th house member in history to be censured after pulling a fire alarm on his way to vote on a stopgap spending bill. he was also linked to problematic blogposts that pushed unfounded conspiracy theories about the september 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. the posts, which bowman said were from more than a decade ago, were unearthed by the daily beast earlier this year and the former representative has since said he regrets them. bowman’s opponent, latimer, offered a more measured approach in a district with a large number of jewish voters. after latimer accepted his win on tuesday night, he told supporters: “we have to fight to make sure that we do not vilify each other, that we remember that we’re all americans, and that our common future is bound together.” joanie greve contributed reporting

anthony izaguirre, associated press anthony izaguirre, associated press leave your feedback live results: new york primary 2024 george latimer, a pro israel centrist, defeated u.s. rep. jamaal bowman on tuesday in a democratic primary in suburban new york that highlighted the party’s deep divisions over the war in gaza. with the victory, latimer has ousted one of the most liberal voices in congress and one of its most outspoken critics of israel. bowman has accused israel of committing genocide in gaza, where thousands of palestinians have died in military strikes. latimer, who got into the race at the urging of jewish leaders and had heavy financial backing from the american israel public affairs committee, is a former state legislator who has served as westchester county executive since 2018. in a victory speech, latimer called for more civility following the contentious election. “we have to fight to make sure we don’t vilify each other and we remember that we’re all americans, and our common future is bound together,” he told supporters at an event in white plains. “we argue, we debate, we find a way to come together,” he said, adding that all representatives had a duty to find ways to work across political divides and prevent the country from splintering. read more: boebert wins gop primary after switching colorado districts bowman had been seeking a third term, representing a district in new york city’s northern suburbs. his defeat is a blow to the party’s progressive wing and a potential cautionary tale for candidates trying to shape their messaging around the israel hamas conflict. his loss also disrupted what has generally been a stable primary season for congressional incumbents. most current members of congress have been able to repel challenges from within their party, though gop rep. bob good is in a tight contest with a rival backed by donald trump in a race that is too close to call. “this movement has always been about justice. it has always been about humanity. it has always been about equality,” bowman said at his election party in yonkers, conceding that he lost the race but remaining unapologetic about his opposition to the war in gaza. the american israel public affairs committee’s political action committee spent nearly $15 million on the primary, filling airwaves and mailboxes with negative ads in an effort to unseat bowman, who has accused the influential pro israel lobbying group of trying to buy the race. “the outcome in this race once again shows that the pro israel position is both good policy and good politics   for both parties,” the american israel public affairs committee said in a statement. some major progressive figures have rushed to bowman’s defense. in the final stretch of the race, he rallied with liberals rep. alexandria ocasio cortez and sen. bernie sanders, while latimer pulled in the endorsement of former presidential candidate and former new york sen. hillary clinton. on israel, both bowman and latimer support a two state solution. they have also both condemned hamas’ oct. 7 attack on southern israel that killed around 1,200 people. but bowman was one of a few progressives who rejected a symbolic house resolution in support of israel following the oct. 7 attack. latimer firmly backs israel and said negotiating a cease fire with hamas is a non starter because he believes it is a terrorist group. bowman was first elected in 2020 after running as a liberal insurgent against moderate u.s. rep. eliot engel, a 16 term congressman who chaired a house committee on foreign affairs. bowman, 48, embraced the political outsider strategy this year as well, depicting latimer as a tool of republican donors and pro israel groups. latimer said bowman’s criticism of israel was only part of the reason why he decided to challenge the incumbent. he said bowman hasn’t been attentive to the needs of the district, maintained few relationships with its leaders, and was more interested in getting spots on cable news than he was in helping people. during the campaign, latimer, who has more than three decades of political experience, often displayed his deep regional knowledge and connections to make the case that he would be an effective member of congress. latimer has said that’s the sort of politics people expect from their elected officials, rather than caustic fights between the far right and far left   a clear dig at bowman. aside from his position on israel, bowman has been followed by lingering criticism over an incident last year when he triggered a fire alarm in a house building while lawmakers were working on a funding bill. he said it was unintentional, with the alarm going off when he tried to open a locked door while trying to vote. bowman was censured by his colleagues in the house, and the incident drew embarrassing news coverage. the congressional district’s boundaries have shifted since bowman first won office in 2020, losing most of its sections in the bronx and adding more of westchester county’s suburbs. today, 21 percent of its voting age population is black and 42 percent is non hispanic white, according to u.s. census figures, compared to 30 percent black and 34 percent white in the district as it existed through 2022. bowman is black. latimer is white. bowman, as the election neared, focused on driving up turnout in what parts of the bronx remain in his district, telling supporters there that the contest could hinge on their votes. he spent the bulk of his election day in the bronx, too, and a video posted to the social media site x showed bowman walking down a street in the bronx with a drum line behind him on tuesday. latimer, 70, will be the prohibitive favorite to win in the general election. the district, which includes parts of westchester and a small piece of the bronx, is a democratic stronghold. nationally, democratic party leaders have emphasized moving toward centrist candidates who might fare better in suburban races. also on tuesday, democratic voters on long island picked former cnn anchor john avlon as the candidate who will challenge incumbent republican rep. nick lalota in a district that’s been controlled by the gop for a decade. avlon defeated retired chemistry professor nancy goroff in the democratic primary. the long island congressional district has become a priority for democrats as the party tries to flip suburban seats in new york as part of a strategy to win a house majority. but winning the seat could be an uphill battle for democrats in november, after democratic state lawmakers changed its borders during redistricting to make it slightly more friendly to republicans to improve their chances in other districts. in central new york, democrats picked state sen. john mannion as the party’s nominee to take on u.s. rep. brandon williams, a republican who represents a recently reconfigured congressional district where president joe biden beat trump by 11 points in the 2020 election. mannion defeated sarah klee hood, a town councilor in the syracuse suburb of dewitt. in another race, incumbent u.s. rep. claudia tenney thwarted a primary challenge from mario fratto, an attorney and businessman who had previously lost to tenney in the last primary election for the safely republican seat located along lake ontario. left: westchester county executive george latimer speaks to supporters after winning his race against democratic incumbent representative jamaal bowman in the 16th congressional district of new york's democratic primary. photo by spencer platt/ getty images anthony izaguirre, associated press anthony izaguirre, associated press support provided by: learn more thank you. please check your inbox to confirm. © 1996   2025 newshour productions llc. all rights reserved. pbs is a 501(c)(3) not for profit organization. sections about stay connected thank you. please check your inbox to confirm. learn more about friends of the news hour. support for news hour provided by

aipac has spent over $14 million in its bid to unseat the far left democrat in his race against challenger george latimer next tuesday. in response, jamaal bowman has called the pro israel group 'the zionist regime' and questioned its targeting of black lawmakers washington   the battle between democratic rep. jamaal bowman and challenger george latimer has already become the single most expensive u.s. house primary in history.
© the intercept all rights reserved despite the various factors that contributed to rep. jamaal bowman’s loss, progressive strategists said there was one clear takeaway from the results. rep. jamaal bowman’s tuesday upset defeat by westchester county executive george latimer generated many perspectives on what exactly precipitated his downfall. the new york times published the headline “bowman falls in house primary, overtaken by flood of pro israel money”   before swapping it out for “bowman falls to latimer in a loss for progressive democrats.” other coverage emphasized that the american israel public affairs committee’s spending wasn’t the only factor in the race and that bowman’s flaws made him particularly vulnerable, as did changed district lines that made his reelection even tougher. progressive strategists, however, had a much more clear takeaway from the results. “you don’t drop $15 million on an election if your positions are popular,” said eva borgwardt⁩, national spokesperson for the jewish advocacy group ifnotnow, which endorsed bowman. “this was an act of desperation from a pro war lobby that is at odds with the majority of americans, including american jews.” borgwardt⁩ was referring to nearly $15 million spent on the race by aipac, the israel lobby’s flagship in the u.s. millions more poured in from aipac aligned groups and donors, bringing the outside spending total to around $25 million. bowman’s supporters emphasized that aipac attacked him not only because of his criticism of human rights abuses in israel, but also because he has supported progressive policies that are popular among the party’s base. “congressman bowman’s progressive platform   which includes defending palestinian rights and halting weapons to the israeli military   is popular among democratic voters,” said beth miller, political director for jewish voice for peace action, which endorsed bowman. “aipac had to spend a truly unprecedented amount of money in order to buy ny 16.” “it is noteworthy that many of aipac’s ads did not even mention israel,” she said. “aipac understands that they are losing on the issues, because voters and constituents do not want to fund a genocide.” the amount of spending on the race should be alarming to everyone who cares about democracy, said sophie ellman golan, director of strategic communications at jews for racial and economic justice. “now we know how much it costs to buy an election,” she said. “that price tag was nearly $25 million.” aipac invested historic amounts of money in the race because it saw that unconditional support for israel was unpopular among democratic voters, ellman golan said. “they would not have spent this much money if they were not scared,” she said. “you don’t spend $25 million   an unheard of amount in a primary   if you’re feeling confident in your candidate.” read our complete coverage progressive groups were outspent 8 to 1 in their support for bowman, which totaled $1.75 million.