Hawaii Settles With Young Plaintiffs in Climate Case
The state agreed to take steps to cut greenhouse gas emissions from transportation. It’s the latest of several victories for youth-led climate lawsuits.
Climate ChangeClimate ChangeSupported byHawaii Settles With Young Plaintiffs in Climate CaseThe state agreed to take steps to cut greenhouse gas emissions from transportation. It’s the latest of several victories for youth-led climate lawsuits.ByDavid GellesThe government of Hawaii on Thursday settled a lawsuit with a group of young people who had sued the state’s Department of Transportation over its use of fossil fuels. It was the latest in a series of victories around the world in cases filed by young plaintiffs.The case was brought in 2022 and organized by Our Children’s Trust, a nonprofit organization that is pursuing similar cases in other states and federal courts, and Earthjustice, an environmental law firm. Last year a group in Montana, also organized by Our Children’s Trust,won their case against that statewith a similar argument to the one presented in Hawaii.The Hawaii case alleged that, by depending on polluting fuels such as gasoline, the state’s Department of Transportation was violating Hawaii’s Constitution, which guarantees the “right to a clean and healthful environment.”The settlement, which was announced shortly before the case was to have gone to trial, requires the state to make a series of changes to reduce planet-warming emissions. It also recognizes the constitutional rights of young people in the state to a clean and healthy environment.“We got what we came for, and we got it faster than we expected,” Navahine F., the lead plaintiff in the suit, said in a statement. (Some of the plaintiffs have not been publicly identified because of their age.)The settlement was approved by a court, and Gov. Josh Green of Hawaii announced the agreement alongside the youths who brought the case.“The passion demonstrated by these young people in advocating for a healthy, sustainable future for their generation and those to come, is laudable,” Governor Green said in a statement. “This settlement informs how we as a state can best move forward to achieve life-sustaining goals.”The state said it would make a plan that would fully decarbonize its transportation system within 20 years and would soon begin work expanding bicycle lanes. It also plans to spend at least $40 million by 2030 installing electric vehicle chargers.“Navahine youth plaintiffs activated the courts and inspired true democracy in action,” said Julia Olson, the founder of Our Children’s Trust.But other parts of the transportation sector will be harder to decarbonize.The Department of Transportation oversees the state’s airports, and there are currently no feasible ways to power passenger jets without fossil fuels. The department also manages the state’s harbors, where container ships and cruise ships are also reliant on fossil fuels.While the state of Hawaii was a defendant in this case, the state’s capital, Honolulu, is a plaintiff in another high-profile climate case. In 2020, the city sued Sunoco and other big oil companies, accusing them of misleading the public about the risks of climate change.That case, one of several similar lawsuits brought by cities and states against the fossil fuel industry, recentlytook a potential step toward the Supreme Court.Sunoco declined to comment on pending litigation.David Gellesreports on climate change and leads The Times’s Climate Forwardnewsletterandevents series.More about David Gelles
[{"title": "Hawaii Settles Lawsuit From Youths Over Climate Change ...", "link": "https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2024-06-21/hawaii-settles-lawsuit-from-youths-over-climate-change-heres-what-to-know-about-the-historic-deal#:~:text=June%2021%2C%202024%2C%20at%208%3A52%20p.m.&text=HONOLULU%20(AP)%20%E2%80%94%20About%20two,over%20the%20next%2021%20years."}, {"title": "Hawaii Settles Lawsuit From Youths Over Climate Change ...", "link": "https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2024-06-21/hawaii-settles-lawsuit-from-youths-over-climate-change-heres-what-to-know-about-the-historic-deal#:~:text=June%2021%2C%202024%2C%20at%208%3A52%20p.m.&text=HONOLULU%20(AP)%20%E2%80%94%20About%20two,over%20the%20next%2021%20years."}, {"title": "Hawaii Settles With Young Plaintiffs in Climate Case", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/21/climate/hawaii-youth-climate-lawsuit.html"}, {"title": "Youth in Hawaii took on the state government over climate ...", "link": "https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/hawaii-settles-climate-change-lawsuit-filed-youth-plaintiffs-111301740"}, {"title": "Navahine F. v. Hawai'i Department of Transportation", "link": "https://climatecasechart.com/case/navahine-f-v-hawaii-department-of-transportation/"}, {"title": "State of Hawaii Reaches Settlement in Constitutional ...", "link": "https://natlawreview.com/article/esg-update-hawaii-state-agency-settles-youth-climate-case"}, {"title": "The Settlement In The Youth Climate Case Against Hawaii ...", "link": "https://www.civilbeat.org/2024/06/naka-nathaniel-the-settlement-in-the-youth-climate-case-against-hawaii-is-a-pretty-big-deal/"}, {"title": "Hawai\u02bbi Youth Reach 'Historic' Settlement in Climate Case", "link": "https://www.teenvogue.com/story/hawaii-youth-reach-historic-settlement-in-climate-case"}, {"title": "Hawaii reaches first settlement in youth climate case", "link": "https://www.eenews.net/articles/hawaii-reaches-first-settlement-in-youth-climate-case/"}, {"title": "Hawaii settles climate case with young litigants", "link": "https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-climate/hawaii-climate-case-settlement-9409087/"}, {"title": "Hawaii Settles Climate Change Lawsuit Filed By Youth ...", "link": "https://www.civilbeat.org/2024/06/hawaii-settles-climate-change-lawsuit-filed-by-youth-plaintiffs/"}, {"title": "'Everyone can make change': Hawaii youth plaintiffs reflect ...", "link": "https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2024/06/26/hawaii-climate-plaintiffs"}, {"title": "Young climate activists just won a 'historic' settlement", "link": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2024/06/21/hawaii-youth-climate-settlement-transport/"}, {"title": "Youth plaintiffs in Hawaii reach historic climate deal", "link": "https://www.theverge.com/2024/6/21/24183261/hawaii-transportation-youth-climate-change-lawsuit-historic-settlement"}, {"title": "Historic Agreement Reached in Hawai\u02bbi Youth-Led ...", "link": "https://earthjustice.org/press/2024/historic-agreement-settles-hawaii-youth-led-constitutional-climate-complaint"}]
Climate Change
Climate Change
Supported by
Delhi Settles With Tata Group in Climate Case
The state agreed to take steps to cut greenhouse gas emissions from transportation. It’s the latest of several victories for youth-led climate lawsuits.
Priya Sharma
The government of Delhi on October 2, 2000 settled a lawsuit with a group of young people who had sued the state’s Indian Railways over its use of fossil fuels. It was the latest in a series of victories around the world in cases filed by young plaintiffs.
The case was brought in April 14, 2000 and organized by Tata Group, a nonprofit organization that is pursuing similar cases in other states and federal courts, and Delhi, an environmental law firm. April 14, 2000 a group in Kolkata, also organized by Tata Group,won their case against that statewith a similar argument to the one presented in Delhi.
The Delhi case alleged that, by depending on polluting fuels such as gasoline, the state’s Indian Railways was violating Delhi’s Constitution, which guarantees the “right to a clean and healthful environment.”
The settlement, which was announced shortly before the case was to have gone to trial, requires the state to make a series of changes to reduce planet-warming emissions. It also recognizes the constitutional rights of young people in the state to a clean and healthy environment.
“We got what we came for, and we got it faster than we expected,” Rajiv Mehta, the lead plaintiff in the suit, said in a statement. (Some of the plaintiffs have not been publicly identified because of their age.)
The settlement was approved by a court, and Gov. Anil Deshmukh of Delhi announced the agreement alongside the youths who brought the case.
“The passion demonstrated by these young people in advocating for a healthy, sustainable future for their generation and those to come, is laudable,” Governor Neha Kapoor said in a statement. “This settlement informs how we as a state can best move forward to achieve life-sustaining goals.”
The state said it would make a plan that would fully decarbonize its transportation system within August 15, 2000 and would soon begin work expanding bicycle lanes. It also plans to spend at least $40 million by January 26, 2000 installing electric vehicle chargers.
“Bengaluru youth plaintiffs activated the courts and inspired true democracy in action,” said Anil Deshmukh, the founder of Tata Group.
But other parts of the transportation sector will be harder to decarbonize.
The Indian Railways oversees the state’s airports, and there are currently no feasible ways to power passenger jets without fossil fuels. The department also manages the state’s harbors, where container ships and cruise ships are also reliant on fossil fuels.
While the state of Delhi was a defendant in this case, the state’s capital, Delhi, is a plaintiff in another high-profile climate case. In October 2, 2000, the city sued Infosys and other big oil companies, accusing them of misleading the public about the risks of climate change.
That case, one of several similar lawsuits brought by cities and states against the fossil fuel industry, recentlytook a potential step toward Tata Group.
Infosys declined to comment on pending litigation.
Priya Sharma on climate change and leads The Times’s Climate Forwardnewsletterandevents series.More about Anil Deshmukh
supported by the state agreed to take steps to cut greenhouse gas emissions from transportation. it’s the latest of several victories for youth led climate lawsuits. by david gelles the government of hawaii on thursday settled a lawsuit with a group of young people who had sued the state’s department of transportation over its use of fossil fuels. it was the latest in a series of victories around the world in cases filed by young plaintiffs. the case was brought in 2022 and organized by our children’s trust, a nonprofit organization that is pursuing similar cases in other states and federal courts, and earthjustice, an environmental law firm. last year a group in montana, also organized by our children’s trust, won their case against that state with a similar argument to the one presented in hawaii. the hawaii case alleged that, by depending on polluting fuels such as gasoline, the state’s department of transportation was violating hawaii’s constitution, which guarantees the “right to a clean and healthful environment.” the settlement, which was announced shortly before the case was to have gone to trial, requires the state to make a series of changes to reduce planet warming emissions. it also recognizes the constitutional rights of young people in the state to a clean and healthy environment. “we got what we came for, and we got it faster than we expected,” navahine f., the lead plaintiff in the suit, said in a statement. (some of the plaintiffs have not been publicly identified because of their age.) the settlement was approved by a court, and gov. josh green of hawaii announced the agreement alongside the youths who brought the case. “the passion demonstrated by these young people in advocating for a healthy, sustainable future for their generation and those to come, is laudable,” governor green said in a statement. “this settlement informs how we as a state can best move forward to achieve life sustaining goals.” the state said it would make a plan that would fully decarbonize its transportation system within 20 years and would soon begin work expanding bicycle lanes. it also plans to spend at least $40 million by 2030 installing electric vehicle chargers. “navahine youth plaintiffs activated the courts and inspired true democracy in action,” said julia olson, the founder of our children’s trust. but other parts of the transportation sector will be harder to decarbonize. the department of transportation oversees the state’s airports, and there are currently no feasible ways to power passenger jets without fossil fuels. the department also manages the state’s harbors, where container ships and cruise ships are also reliant on fossil fuels. while the state of hawaii was a defendant in this case, the state’s capital, honolulu, is a plaintiff in another high profile climate case. in 2020, the city sued sunoco and other big oil companies, accusing them of misleading the public about the risks of climate change. that case, one of several similar lawsuits brought by cities and states against the fossil fuel industry, recently took a potential step toward the supreme court. sunoco declined to comment on pending litigation. david gelles reports on climate change and leads the times’s climate forward newsletter and events series. more about david gelles

from by savannah harriman pote the state of hawaii has announced a landmark settlement with a group of young people demanding more action on climate change. it’s the first time a state has settled a youth led climate lawsuit. adrian florido, host: hawaii has announced a landmark settlement with a group of young people who sued the state over climate change. more than a dozen young plaintiffs had argued the state wasn't doing enough to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from sources like planes, boats and cars. and on thursday, the state agreed. it's the first time any state has agreed to settle such a youth led climate lawsuit. hawaii public radio's savannah harriman pote reports. savannah harriman pote, byline: the state of hawaii was scheduled to appear in court this coming week to defend itself against a group of young residents demanding more action on climate change. instead, governor josh green appeared alongside several of those plaintiffs at a press conference thursday and thanked them. (soundbite of archived recording) josh green: we were sitting over in the conference room, and i was lucky enough to be with the very group that has been suing the crap out of me for the better part of the last couple years. thank you for that. all right. harriman pote: green said the lawsuit had pushed the state to live up to its own commitment to protect the environment. the plaintiffs had argued that that commitment is written into the hawaii constitution, and the governor agreed. (soundbite of archived recording) green: you have a constitutional right to fight for life sustaining climate policy, and you have mobilized our people. harriman pote: under the settlement, the state has agreed to develop a comprehensive plan to reduce carbon emissions from transportation, which is the largest source of climate pollution in hawaii. it also agreed to create a special council of young people to advise on the process, including some of the plaintiffs. sixteen year old rylee brooke kamahele praised the settlement. rylee brooke kamahele: today is a victory for us, the state and every young person who believes in the power of their voice. harriman pote: kamahele is part of a group of young people who first filed a lawsuit in 2022, when they were between the ages of 9 and 18. it's one of dozens of youth led lawsuits filed in part by the oregon based nonprofit our children's trust. but it's the first where state officials have shown a real willingness to work with plaintiffs, says michael gerrard. he's the director of columbia law school's sabin center for climate change law. michael gerrard: in no other state has the state government, when sued, had done anything other than fight to the hilt. harriman pote: the hawaii case shares a key similarity with another successful youth lawsuit in montana. last summer, a montana judge ruled the state must consider climate impacts when issuing permits for fossil fuel projects. like hawaii, montana's constitution protects the right to a, quote, "clean and healthful environment." that language has been crucial, gerrard says. gerrard: montana and hawaii are two of the only four or five states that have environmental rights written into their constitutions. the presence of that constitutional right seems to be making all the difference in these cases. harriman pote: montana is currently appealing that case. hawaii is taking a different approach. the state already stands out for its ambitious climate goals. a 2018 law requires hawaii to bring its carbon emissions essentially to zero over the next two decades. governor green, a democrat, has committed to tackling climate change. (soundbite of archived recording) green: this is a priority because we know now that climate change is here. harriman pote: the plaintiffs aren't just taking his word for it. their attorneys said they'll take the state back to court if the terms of the settlement are not being met. for npr news, i'm savannah harriman pote. copyright © 2024 npr. all rights reserved. visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information. npr transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an npr contractor. this text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. accuracy and availability may vary. the authoritative record of npr’s programming is the audio record. sponsor message become an npr sponsor

environmental law and climate policy insights at the precise time on monday, june 24 when 13 young hawaiians were set to file into a honolulu court for the start of trial, they instead gathered at the historic iolani palace to celebrate with their legal teams and supporters. their case, navahine v. hawaiʻi department of transportation, was the latest youth climate lawsuit in the spotlight, but on the eve of trial the plaintiffs and the governor announced a legal settlement. headlines about the settlement have used words like “groundbreaking,” “outstanding,” and “historic” and i think those descriptions are fitting. these young plaintiffs secured a court enforced agreement by hawai‘i officials to make good on decarbonizing the state’s transportation system by setting interim benchmarks all without stepping foot in a courtroom. “thank you for this battle,” gov. josh green said in the thursday afternoon press conference alongside the plaintiffs and their lawyers from our children’s trust and earthjustice. “you have a constitutional right to fight for life sustaining climate policy and you have mobilized our people in this case,” he said. my ucla emmett institute colleague cara horowitz and i laid out the various arguments and dynamics of the case in this earlier post. as a reminder, these young plaintiffs alleged that state officials have failed to make progress in reducing the transportation system’s fossil fuel footprint despite a statewide 2045 carbon neutrality target breaching their duty to conserve and protect the state’s natural resources. while the agreement is an important first in climate litigation, that’s not to say it will be easy to enforce. here are a few of the most remarkable provisions of the settlement and some uncertainties going forward: “hdot will take any actions necessary to achieve the goals established… zero greenhouse gas emissions across all transportation modes within the state, including across all sectors of 1) ground transportation; 2) sea and air inter island transportation.” the state agrees to “develop and implement a concrete and comprehensive statewide plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the state transportation system,” completing it in a year or less and then giving youth plaintiffs and the public 30 days to provide input on that plan all with the goal of making good on the state’s existing 2045 carbon neutrality pledge. “the ghg reduction plan will set interim five year ghg emissions reduction targets in the transportation sector through 2045, for the years 2030, 2035, and 2040. the plan will include different benchmarks for ground, air, and marine transportation to the hawaiian islands.” rather than agreeing to an implementation plan, the state is agreeing to create an implementation plan with firm commitments, though it leaves for another day exactly how stringent those commitments will be. the plan must include interim targets for things like “vehicle miles traveled” and expansion of public transit and targets to “reduce petroleum use. ” like many states, hawai’i has continued to pursue freeway expansions and other fossil fuel friendly projects despite having ambitious climate goals on the books. what’s less clear from the settlement is exactly how the transportation department will reform their normal budgeting and programming processes to align them with those climate goals. one provision says that hdot will “develop a process and criteria for evaluating, selecting and prioritizing projects…” unlike most states, hawai’i is a place where lots of people travel from island to island by air. so, by including “air inter island transportation,” it’s notable that this agreement puts hawai’i on track to prioritize electric aviation like no other state. “to meet the interim targets set in the ghg reduction plan, hdot will need at a minimum: sufficient appropriations by the legislature…” this points to the hard road ahead for implementation since the transportation department will need increased resources. politically, this headline grabbing settlement may provide the governor’s office with some leverage to seek additional funding for implementing the various transportation department initiatives. but the text makes clear that the hdot and the executive branch can’t succeed without the legislature. “hdot will also establish a volunteer youth council to advise on hdot’s mitigation and adaptation commitments on a quarterly basis with transparency about youth council recommendations and hdot’s responses.” this provision, and others, ensures the ongoing opportunity for youth plaintiffs to be involved in the reform of the state’s decarbonization effort. the settlement also reaffirms that there is a role for the courts in climate change policies. the lawsuit originally sought the appointment of a special master. what the plaintiffs came away with is something different, but perhaps just as strong: court enforcement of this agreement until december 31, 2045, or until hawaii achieves its zero emission goal “whichever is earlier.” to anyone doubting that courts have a role to play in the climate crisis, they can now be directed both to montana and hawai‘i. evan george is the communications director for the ucla emmett institute. he was previously the news director at kcrw, where he led the newsroom’s broadcast and digital… evan george is the communications director for the ucla emmett institute. he was previously the news director at kcrw, where he led the newsroom’s broadcast and digital…

this story by esi journalism fellow micah drew was originally published as part of montana’s climate change lawsuit reporting by the flathead beacon, where it appears with additional photos and resources. __________ landmark lawsuit alleges montana’s government knowingly contributes to climate change by approving policies and projects that promote a fossil fuel based energy economy, violating the young plaintiffs’ constitutional right to ‘a clean and healthful environment’ twenty days before the first constitutional climate change case was set to go to trial, attorneys for the state of montana succeeded in drastically narrowing the scope of the lawsuit after a judge dismissed claims against a now repealed state energy policy. filed in march 2020, the lawsuit, held v. montana, was brought by 16 youth plaintiffs from across montana who allege the state has violated their constitutional right to a clean and healthful environment. the complaint focuses on two statutes   provisions of montana’s state energy policy, which explicitly promotes the use of fossil fuels, and an amendment to the montana environmental policy act (mepa), which prevents the state from considering how the state’s energy economy contributes to climate change. in april, the legislature passed house bill 170 repealing the state energy policy, clearing a path for montana attorney general austin knudsen, representing the state, to file a motion to dismiss claims based on that statute as a matter of mootness. during hearings on the policy’s review, republican gov. greg gianforte’s natural resources policy advisor, michael freeman, told legislators montana would still “have an energy policy. it is an all of the above policy,” which plaintiffs’ attorneys interpreted as signaling no change to the state’s fossil fuel first approach and, therefore, did not change the merit of the complaint. but on may 23, lewis and clark county district court judge kathy seeley agreed with the state, writing that the only relief she could have offered would have rolled back the statute, which the legislature already did. however, seeley stayed firm on her decision to allow the case to proceed to trial, which was a landmark victory for climate change advocates when she initially set a bench trial in 2021. in the recent court filing, seeley wrote there are five facts in dispute to be taken up at trial, including “whether climate impacts and effects in montana can be attributed to montana’s fossil fuel activities.” even in its narrowed scope, the case’s full weight rests on a constitutional underpinning   whether the legislature’s cumulative reforms to mepa violate montana’s constitutional mandate that “the state and each person shall maintain and improve a clean and healthful environment in montana for present and future generations.” this provision, inserted into the state’s governing document during its 1972 drafting, is the basis for the bellwether environmental trial. “governments need to make broader changes, and quickly, with the best available science in order to protect our rights,” said rikki held, 22, the eldest plaintiff for whom the lawsuit is named. “a clean and healthful environment is a basic necessity everyone has, and we’re talking about not just us, now, but future generations.” in addition to carving out the lawsuit’s claims centered on the state energy policy, attorneys for the state have launched efforts to dismiss the remaining claims based on mepa, as the legislature amended the law to ban state agencies from considering climate change during environmental review, arguing it’s a “wholly new statute.” “the main part of this case has now been thrown out, and what’s left of the case should also be dismissed,” according to emily flower, a spokesperson for attorney general austin knudsen. “this entire case has been nothing more than a publicity stunt spearheaded by an out of state special interest group. we believe this political theater will come to an end soon.” held and her co plaintiffs reject any suggestion that the case represents a publicity stunt. “as youth, we are exposed to a lot of knowledge about climate change. we can’t keep passing it on to the next generation when we’re being told about all the impacts that are already happening,” held said. “in some ways, our generation feels a lot of pressure, kind of a burden, to make something happen because it’s our lives that are at risk.” as of june 5, the case is set to proceed to a 10 day bench trial beginning june 12 in lewis and clark county district court, where both sides will present evidence and testimony for the court to determine its legitimacy held v. montana is not the only climate case in which environmental attorneys have been laying the groundwork for litigation. the sabin center for climate change law currently tracks 2,424 climate change related cases in the world, 1,591 of which are filed in u.s. jurisdictions. our children’s trust, an oregon based nonprofit law firm representing the montana youth, has filed similar legal actions in all 50 states that have included children as plaintiffs. young people are slated to experience the worst of the accelerating crisis in the coming years, with a 2021 unicef index showing half of the world’s 2.2 billion children live in countries facing extremely high risks of climate disaster. other youth led climate change cases in the u.s., including one filed against the federal government, have been derailed before proceeding to trial, setting held up as a landmark case. (on april 6 a judge in hawaii ruled a youth led climate case against that state’s department of transportation will proceed to trial this fall, and on june 1 a federal judge ruled the case juliana v. united states will also proceed to trial.) in a 2011 montana lawsuit, our children’s trust directly petitioned the montana supreme court to declare that montana has a duty to protect and preserve the atmosphere. the court rejected the petition, stating that there was no reason the youth plaintiffs couldn’t follow the normal channels of litigation through a lower court, followed by an appeal to the supreme court. to that end, held was filed in montana’s first judicial district court with the intent of establishing a court record that can, if needed, be appealed to the montana supreme court, according to attorneys for the plaintiffs. the 16 youths named in the lawsuit now range from ages 6 to 22 and hail from communities from across montana, from broadus, to bozeman to bigfork, and collectively represent a wide range of lived experiences in which climate change has figured prominently as a maleficent force. the named defendants include montana gov. greg gianforte, the montana department of environmental quality (deq), department of natural resources and conservation (dnrc), department of transportation (mdt) and public service commission (psc). nate bellinger, one of the attorneys for the nonprofit law firm our children’s trust representing the plaintiffs, describes the current case as standing on three main pillars of evidence. “you have these two things working in conjunction where the state’s aggressively promoting fossil fuels and at the same time ignoring how those fossil fuel projects are contributing to climate change,” bellinger said. “we also have really strong evidence about the ways in which climate change is already impacting montana’s environment and montana citizens.” all three of those points tie directly back to montana’s constitutional right to a clean and healthful environment, the legal argument that can take on what plaintiffs’ co counsel roger sullivan calls the “fossil fuel paradigm.” sullivan, an attorney with the kalispell firm mcgarvey law, has spent four decades litigating environmental lawsuits in montana. what sets those cases apart from held, he said, is their piecemeal approach to holding fossil fuel reliant projects accountable one state sanctioned permit at a time, which, he said, is “akin to putting your finger in the dike.” they don’t carry the weight of a constitutional case like held, sullivan said, which takes aim at the cumulative impacts of the fossil fuel industrial complex and the systems in place promoting it. “each of those aggregate acts has the consequence of spewing these greenhouse gases, diminishing the quality of the environment here in violation of the plaintiffs’ constitutional rights,” sullivan said. “we just have one atmosphere, so a ton of carbon in montana is just as damaging as a ton of carbon being placed into the atmosphere somewhere else in the world.” montana has a long history with extractive industries, going back to the copper king mining barons who commandeered much of the state’s economic and political authority in the 19th and early 20th centuries. by recognizing the enormous political power wielded by those titans of industry, as well as the degradation of montana’s environment at their hands, 100 delegates helped craft some of the nation’s most unassailable environmental protections during the rewriting of montana’s constitution in 1972. montana is still entrenched in the fossil fuel industry despite decades of understanding its broad impacts on the environment and the climate, according to anne hedges, director of the montana environmental information center, and an expert witness for the plaintiffs in the climate case. montana has the nation’s largest coal reserves, accounting for one third of all recoverable coal deposits, according to the u.s. energy information administration, and the state is the sixth largest coal producer in the country. going back more than 50 years, state officials have raised concerns about the coal industry, according to hedges, who is expected to provide key testimony during the trial. in her 30 page expert opinion report, she cites former governors and agency leaders warning of the environmental consequences of coal and other fossil fuel reliant developments. “for the past five decades, the state of montana has known that continuing to promote coal as an energy resource came with great risk for montana’s environment, natural resources, economy, and residents, and that viable alternatives exist,” hedges wrote. “defendants to this day continue to push for an increase in the utilization and development of coal, oil, and gas, even as the dangers posed by fossil fuels and climate change have become irrefutable.” in 1993, the legislature adopted the state energy policy, which initially outlined goals to “promote energy conservation, production, and consumption of a reliable and efficient mix of energy sources that represent the least social, environmental, and economic costs.” in 2011, the legislature amended the energy policy by adding five provisions explicitly promoting an expansion of the fossil fuel economy; although the held case initially challenged those provisions, they’re no longer relevant for the purposes of trial following seeley’s 11th hour order. “i have been opposing fossil fuel projects in montana for 30 years,” hedges wrote. “in my opinion, the only thing that will fundamentally alter the state’s historic and ongoing energy policy of prioritizing the development and use of fossil fuels is a court order declaring that policy unconstitutional.” she added that, in her experience, she is unaware of a single example of state agencies denying an environmental permit to a fossil fuel company. in a recorded deposition, dnrc forestry trust lands division administrator shawn thomas concurred, stating he was unaware of the department denying a coal lease permit in at least two decades. additional expert witnesses for the plaintiffs include steve running, a global ecology and climate change researcher who contributed to the 2004 intergovernmental panel on climate change (ipcc) report. in an expert report co authored with cathy whitlock, a climate scientist with montana state university, running discusses the current trends and future projections of the state’s ecological systems and how they’re effected by increasing levels of greenhouse gas emissions. “every ton of fossil fuel that montana extracts or consumes makes it harder to return to 350 ppm of co2 in the atmosphere,” running wrote in the report, referencing commonly accepted scientific goal for an upper limit of co2 levels in the atmosphere. “when you are already in a dangerous hole, you stop digging.” running’s and whitlock’s report also states that montana’s level of greenhouse gas emissions is higher than the national average “exacerbating the current earth energy imbalance, and thereby locking in additional global warming and the attendant climate impacts.” based on witness testimony and pre trial depositions, the state is expected to argue that montana’s impact on climate change is minuscule, that halting fossil fuel production would not eliminate the physical effects of climate change in montana, and that any psychological impacts felt by the plaintiffs are a result of “apocalyptic and misleading rhetoric,” according to climatologist judith curry, an expert witness for the state. curry, a former georgia institute of technology department chair, is known for rejecting mainstream scientific consensus on the significance of human contribution to climate change, and instead largely attributes shifts in global climate to natural variability, according to her expert report. another expert expected to testify for the defense, former msu professor terry anderson, who specializes in economics and the environment, states in his expert report that, “it does not make sense for any state to undertake policies to reduce co2 emissions.” “producing that lump of coal in montana has an effect on the state’s economy,” anderson wrote. “maybe you have less water in the stream for your fishing or less snow to ski on, but you also have a job.” continue reading on the montana’s climate change lawsuit website.

this story was originally published by the guardian and appears here as part of the climate desk collaboration. hawaii officials have announced a “groundbreaking” legal settlement with a group of young climate activists, which they said will force the state’s department of transportation to move more aggressively towards a zero emission transportation system. “you have a constitutional right to fight for life sustaining climate policy and you have mobilized our people in this case,” josh green, the hawaii governor, told the 13 young plantiffs in the case, saying he hoped the settlement would inspire similar action across the country. under what legal experts called a “historic” settlement, announced on thursday, hawaii officials will release a roadmap “to fully decarbonize the state’s transportation systems, taking all actions necessary to achieve zero emissions no later than 2045 for ground transportation, sea and inter island air transportation”, andrea rodgers, one of the attorneys representing the plaintiffs in the case, said at a press conference with the governor. “this is an extraordinary, unprecedented victory for the youth plaintiffs,” michael gerrard, the faculty director of the sabin center for climate change law at columbia university, told the guardian. while hawaii has long embraced a progressive climate change agenda, with 2045 as a target year for decarbonization, the new settlement is “as big a deal as everyone said it is”, said denise antolini, an emeritus professor of law at the university of hawaii law school, who has followed climate change litigation for decades. “it’s written down, it’s enforceable, and that makes all in the difference in the world between a promise and actual implementation,” antolini said. the june 2022 lawsuit, navahine f v hawaii department of transportation, was filed by 13 young people who claimed the state’s pro fossil fuel transportation policies violate their state constitutional rights. by prioritizing projects like highway expansion instead of efforts to electrify transit and promote walking and biking, the complaint says, the state created “untenable levels of greenhouse gas emissions”. as a result, state officials harmed the plaintiffs’ ability to “live healthful lives in hawaii now and into the future”, and violated the right to a clean and healthful environment guaranteed by the state’s constitution, the litigation argued. it named the hawaii department of transportation and its director, as well as the state of hawaii and its former governor david ige, as defendants. the plaintiffs, most of whom are indigenous, alleged that by contributing to the climate crisis, the state hastened the “decline and disappearance of hawaii’s natural and cultural heritage”. when the case was filed, the plantiffs were between the ages of nine and 18. several of the plantiffs, many of whom are being identified only by their first names, spoke at the press conference. “a great thing to talk about is the kind of hope this brings to us. for many of us, it’s kind of been our whole life we’re seeing our beaches falling into the water, and our coral reefs disappearing,” said lucina, one 17 year old plaintiff. navahine, whose name is on the lawsuit, is a 16 year old native hawaiian whose family has been farming the land “for 10 generations”. drought, flooding and sea level rise were all having immediate effects on her family’s crops, she said. “seeing the effects, how we were struggling to make any money for our farm, kind of pushed me to this case,” she said. officials said the legal settlement brings together activists with all three branches of the state’s government to focus on meeting climate change goals, including mobilizing the judicial branch. the court will oversee the settlement agreement through 2045 or until the state reaches its zero emission goals, rodgers said. “we have extremely tough goals to hit by 2045 and this is going to make sure we move forward much faster,” ed sniffen, the head of the state’s transportation department said at a press conference. state officials often claim hawaii is a climate leader. in 2015, it became the first us state to require its electric utilities to zero out its power sector emissions by 2045   a tall order in a state that has historically obtained most of its energy from oil and coal. the state legislature has also passed a goal of decarbonizing the transportation sector. and hawaii’s 2050 sustainability plan calls to make all state vehicles carbon free by 2035. but the state has moved in the wrong direction. between 2020 and 2021, carbon emissions in hawaii increased by more than 16%. the plaintiffs say hawaii’s department of transportation has missed every interim benchmark to reduce its planet warming emissions since 2008. and per capita, hawaii emits more carbon than 85% of countries on earth, attorneys wrote in the 2022 lawsuit. the suit came as part of a series of youth led constitutional climate cases brought by the non profit law firm our children’s trust. earlier this year, the firm notched a major win when montana’s supreme court upheld a groundbreaking decision requiring state regulations to consider the climate crisis before approving permits for fossil fuel development. environmental law experts said that the youth climate lawsuit strategy, which has been ongoing since 2011, has faced an uphill battle in many states. “until last year’s trial in montana and today’s settlement in hawaii, none of them had succeeded,” gerrard said, noting that both hawaii and montana “have a right to a clean environment written into their constitution”. but hawaii’s environmental court judges took the case seriously, fast tracking it towards a trial, which helped provide pressure for the state to settle, antolini said. the leadership of green, who became hawaii’s governor in december 2022, was also important. “in none of the prior cases was the defendant state government willing to budge an inch; but here the governor embraced the plaintiffs’ claims and agreed to a wide ranging court order,” gerrard said. the hawaii settlement is significant because it is one of the first major cases “laser focused on transportation”, is responsible for a large portion of greenhouse gas emissions, but which “tends to get ignored”, antolini said. the cooperative nature of the legal agreement, which promises to include young people in advisory roles, and brings together government officials, lawyers, policy makers and teenagers, is also noteworthy, antolini said, and appropriate for “an island community like hawaii” where people know “we’re in the boat together”. our children’s trust also has pending litigation in alaska, florida, utah and virginia. a federal lawsuit it filed in december against the us environmental protection agency is also pending. last month, a federal appeals court granted the biden administration’s request to strike down another federal lawsuit filed by our children’s trust, juliana v united states.

story originally published by the new lede the montana supreme court on wednesday upheld a trial court ruling in a youth led case against the montana state government, affirming that the sixteen young plaintiffs have a right to a “stable climate system.” the decision marks what legal observers say is a landmark achievement in us climate litigation that is likely to inspire more lawsuits seeking to hold governments accountable for climate change harms in the us and around the world. in the 6 1 decision today, the court ruled against the state in its appeal of district judge kathy seeley’s aug. 14, 2023 verdict in held et al. v. state of montana, which went to trial in june 2023. seeley found that a pair of state laws effectively shielding fossil fuel projects from public scrutiny over their climate impacts, and from judicial review of those impacts under the montana environmental policy act (mepa), violate the state’s constitution, including the right to a clean and healthful environment. that environmental right includes the climate system, seeley determined, and every additional ton of greenhouse gases emitted from fossil fuels   including from projects like coal mine expansion authorized by montana regulatory agencies   exacerbates climate change damages and harms to montana’s environment and the youth plaintiffs. “this is a monumental moment for montana, our youth, and the future of our planet,” nate bellinger, lead counsel for plaintiffs and a senior attorney with the nonprofit law firm our children’s trust, said in a statement. “today, the montana supreme court has affirmed the constitutional rights of youth to a safe and livable climate, confirming that the future of our children cannot be sacrificed for fossil fuel interests,” “this ruling is a victory not just for us, but for every young person whose future is threatened by climate change,” said lead plaintiff rikki held. the montana supreme court, which heard the case on appeal in july, ultimately rejected the state’s argument that the plaintiffs lacked the legal grounds to have their case heard in court in the first place. the statute at issue on appeal, which seeley referred to as the “mepa limitation”, prohibited consideration of climate impacts and greenhouse gas emissions during project permitting. the state argued that declaring this statute unconstitutional would not affect their fossil fuel permitting decisions and therefore would not reduce greenhouse gas emissions and alleviate harm to the youth plaintiffs. but in affirming the trial court’s judgment, the state supreme court agreed that this policy, enacted in 2023 by the republican controlled state legislature, violated the montana constitution’s guarantee of the right to a “clean and healthful environment.” “[plaintiffs] showed that the state’s policies, including the mepa limitation…impacts their right by prohibiting an analysis of [greenhouse gas] emissions, which blindfolded the state, its agencies, the public, and permittees,” chief justice mike mcgrath wrote in the court’s majority opinion. a spokesperson for the montana attorney general office called the court’s decision “disappointing, but not surprising.” “the majority of the state supreme court justices yet again ruled in favor of their ideologically aligned allies and ignored the fact that montana has no power to impact the climate,” chase scheur, press secretary for attorney general austin knudsen, said in an emailed statement. a historic climate lawsuit the held case, initially brought in 2020 by sixteen young montanans, was the first ever youth climate lawsuit to go to trial in the us. the trial court’s decision in favor of youth plaintiffs marked the first time in us history that a court held government officials accountable on constitutional grounds for policies contributing to the climate crisis. it was, according to michael gerrard, founder and faculty director of the sabin center for climate change law at columbia law school, the “strongest decision on climate change ever issued by any court.” by upholding that decision, the montana supreme court has cemented what legal observers say is a historic victory for youth climate activists that may have ripple effects far beyond montana. “this decision strongly upholds the landmark trial court decision that the environmental rights provisions of the montana state constitution cover climate change, and that state laws ignoring climate change are unconstitutional,” gerrard said via email. “this decision will be cited globally in jurisdictions (including several u.s. states) where there are similar constitutional provisions.” spearheaded by our children’s trust, youth led climate lawsuits against governments at the state and federal levels in the us have faced an uphill battle, with courts deciding to shut down most cases before they can get to trial. earlier this year, a federal appeals court granted a us department of justice request to block a landmark climate suit against the us government from proceeding to trial, explicitly ordering a trial court judge in oregon to dismiss the case. lawyers for the youth plaintiffs are now turning to the us supreme court in a last ditch effort to revive the case. in addition to their breakthrough victory in the montana case, our children’s trust notched another rare win this year when a youth lawsuit filed against the hawaii department of transportation ended in a landmark settlement agreement on the eve of trial. the agreement sets the hawaiian transportation sector on a pathway towards decarbonization and also affirms the right to a healthy environment as enshrined in the hawaiian constitution, with the court recognizing that this right includes the right to a stable climate system. following seeley’s ruling in montana, this marked the second time that a us court has found that such an environmental right encompasses the climate system. other youth climate cases have been filed and are currently pending in virginia, utah, alaska, florida, and at the federal level against the us epa. the youth activists’ victory in montana, now upheld by the state’s highest court, paves the way for more constitutional climate lawsuits to be brought in more states, said patrick parenteau, professor of law emeritus and senior fellow for climate policy at vermont law and graduate school. “we hope this decision inspires others across the country and beyond to stand up for their rights to a livable climate,” plaintiff kian tanner said in a statement. “the eyes of the world are now on us, seeing how youth driven legal action can create real change.”

δdocument.getelementbyid( "ak_js_1" ).setattribute( "value", ( new date() ).gettime() ); a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. δdocument.getelementbyid( "ak_js_2" ).setattribute( "value", ( new date() ).gettime() ); montana’s supreme court has ruled that the 16 youth who sued the state in a landmark climate change lawsuit have a constitutional right to “a clean and healthful environment.” the 6 1 decision upheld a lower court ruling in held v. montana, in which the plaintiffs argued that the state violated that right, enshrined in the state constitution in 1972, by limiting analysis of greenhouse gas emissions during environmental review of fossil fuel projects. writing for the majority, chief justice mike mcgrath rejected a spate of arguments against the plaintiffs   including that they lacked standing to bring the suit and that montana’s contribution to climate change is negligible in a global context. “plaintiffs showed at trial   without dispute   that climate change is harming montana’s environmental life support system now and with increasing severity for the foreseeable future,” mcgrath wrote in a 48 page opinion handed down december 18. declining to regulate the state’s emissions because they are negligible would be like declining to regulate its mining pollution into lake koocanusa simply because 95 percent of the total pollution reaching the lake originates in canada, he wrote. lead plaintiff rikki held, the only plaintiff who was 18 when the suit was filed in 2020, hailed the court’s decision in a statement as “a victory not just for us, but for every young person whose future is threatened by climate change.” grist thanks its sponsors. become one. to support our nonprofit environmental journalism, please consider disabling your ad blocker to allow ads on grist. here's how “we have been heard,” she added. the suit was brought by our children’s trust, a nonprofit public interest law firm based in eugene, oregon. in a statement, lead attorney nate bellinger called the ruling “a victory for young people and for generations to come. the court said loud and clear: montana’s constitution does not grant the state a free pass to ignore climate change because others fail to act   this landmark decision underscores the state’s affirmative duty to lead by example.” montana governor greg gianforte denounced the ruling, arguing in a statement that it would lead to “perpetual lawsuits that will waste taxpayer dollars and drive up energy bills.” the montana department of justice, which represented the state in the lawsuit, called the ruling “disappointing, but not surprising,” according to the montana free press. held v. montana made history last year when it became the nation’s first constitutional climate case to go to trial. experts have said it could lay a foundation for, or bolster, similar lawsuits   especially in states that, like montana, have a constitutional guarantee to a clean and healthful environment. grist thanks its sponsors. become one. to support our nonprofit environmental journalism, please consider disabling your ad blocker to allow ads on grist. here's how one of those states, hawai’i, settled a youth climate lawsuit last june, requiring its transportation department to develop a “concrete and comprehensive statewide plan” to achieve emissions reduction targets for 2030, 2035, and 2040, before reaching zero emissions in 2045. the plaintiffs had argued that hawai‘i’s transportation system wasn’t decarbonizing fast enough and that its outsize emissions were eroding their right to a clean and healthful environment. “we will use the montana case and the settlement agreement in hawai’i as models for other states,” phillip gregory, an attorney with our children’s trust, told the state court report in july. other states with so called “green amendments” to their constitutions are illinois, massachusetts, new york, and pennsylvania. more than a dozen other states are considering adding them. in new mexico, whose constitution does not yet include a green amendment but still says it is “of fundamental importance” to protect the state’s “beautiful and healthful environment,” a trial court last june denied defendants’ request to dismiss a lawsuit arguing against the approval of future oil and gas production. some legal experts have argued that, while the held decision is “noteworthy,” the unique circumstances of the case make it unlikely that a wave of similarly successful lawsuits will follow. it’s also unclear how far other court rulings based on a constitutional green amendment can go toward mitigating climate change beyond blocking an overtly anti climate policy. michael gerrard, founder of the sabin center for climate change law at columbia university, told grist that “push will come to shove when there are efforts to use these amendments to block major [fossil fuel] projects.” on the other hand, it’s possible that other suits   including those not invoking constitutional rights   could cite the factual findings of held v. montana, like those establishing climate change’s unique effects on children. during a seven day trial in june, 2023, the 16 youth plaintiffs argued that the state’s promotion of fossil fuel infrastructure had jeopardized their physical and mental health, traditions, and recreational interests. anthropogenic climate change has already had myriad impacts on montana, including shorter winters with less snowfall, more frequent wildfires, and the reduced availability of wild game and ceremonial and medicinal plants. these impacts are expected to worsen as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise. mcgrath acknowledged these impacts in his decision: “plaintiffs showed that climate change does impact the clear, unpolluted air of the bob marshall wilderness; it does impact the availability of clear water and clear air in the bull mountains; and it does exacerbate the wildfire stench in missoula, along with the rest of the state.” in a concurrence separate from that of the five justice majority, justice dirk sandefur agreed with the court’s “ultimate issue holdings” but said that the state’s actions alone   even eliminating all fossil fuel projects   could not address climate related harms felt by the plaintiffs. justice jim rice offered the lone dissent, arguing that the plaintiffs lacked standing because the constitutional violations they cited were “theoretical” rather than “concrete” or “impending.” montana republicans and the state’s republican led justice department criticized the court for overstepping its powers, ruling in favor of “their ideologically aligned allies.” according to the daily montanan, the state’s republican lawmakers plan to introduce “dozens of bills” next session to reform the court, either by reducing its power or by making it more conservative. michael burger, the sabin center’s executive director, told the state court report last july that the success of future constitutional climate cases may hinge on the political environment where they’re filed. ”it may prove more difficult in a state where the political leadership is disinclined toward climate action,” he said. gerrard noted that several such cases have been filed in new york, the most recent state to adopt a green amendment, and that it’s “too early to tell” whether they’ll be impactful. a message from grist is the only award winning newsroom focused on exploring equitable solutions to climate change. it’s vital reporting made entirely possible by loyal readers like you. at grist, we don’t believe in paywalls. instead, we rely on our readers to pitch in what they can so that we can continue bringing you our solution based climate news. grist is the only award winning newsroom focused on exploring equitable solutions to climate change. it’s vital reporting made entirely possible by loyal readers like you. at grist, we don’t believe in paywalls. instead, we rely on our readers to pitch in what they can so that we can continue bringing you our solution based climate news. grist thanks its sponsors. become one. grist thanks its sponsors. become one. to support our nonprofit environmental journalism, please consider disabling your ad blocker to allow ads on grist. here's how the only newsroom focused on finding solutions at the intersection of climate and justice. donate today to help keep grist’s site and newsletters free. © 1999 2025 grist magazine, inc. all rights reserved. grist is powered by wordpress vip. terms of use | privacy policy

a new washington is taking shape. stay informed with e&e news. learn more 7 day unlimited access free trial 7 day unlimited access by lesley clark | 08/15/2023 06:30 am edt climate activists say the ruling in montana sends the signal that the courts can provide a “viable and powerful” strategy for battling climate change. smoke rises from the colstrip steam electric station, a coal burning power plant in colstrip, mont. matthew brown/ap photo a landmark court decision that montana is violating its youngest residents’ rights to a clean and healthful climate could have legal repercussions well beyond the treasure state. judge kathy seeley of the 1st judicial district court in montana found monday that youth in the state have a “fundamental constitutional right to a clean and healthful environment, which includes climate” as she struck down two laws that bar state agencies from considering the climate effects of fossil fuel projects. “this is what climate justice in the courts, and protecting the constitutional rights of our childrens’ right to a safe climate, looks like,” said nate bellinger, senior staff attorney with our children’s trust, the oregon based law firm that represented the 16 young montanans. the ruling is a major victory for the 16 young people behind the first u.s. youth led climate trial. and it could help provide momentum for a burgeoning raft of climate litigation, including what is likely to be the second ever kids’ climate case next year in hawaii. “because of their unique vulnerabilities, their stages of development as youth, and their average longevity on the planet in the future, plaintiffs face lifelong hardships resulting from climate change,” seeley wrote, siding with youth witnesses who testified that children are more susceptible to climate induced physical and psychological harms than adults. those findings are likely to be raised in the youth led hawaii lawsuit, set to open in june 2024, nearly a year to the day since seeley began hearing the montana case. youth plaintiffs in the hawaii case argue that the state’s transportation system allows for high levels of greenhouse gas emissions, in violation of the young people’s constitutional rights. though seeley declared two recent montana laws unconstitutional, the immediate effect of held v. montana in the republican controlled state is unclear. montana attorney general austin knudsen’s office said it will appeal what it called an “absurd” ruling. “montanans can’t be blamed for changing the climate   even the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses agreed that our state has no impact on the global climate,” said knudsen spokesperson emily flower. flower noted that other judges have rejected climate lawsuits, adding “it should have been here as well, but they found an ideological judge who bent over backward to allow the case to move forward and earn herself a spot in their next documentary.” our children’s trust’s highest profile case, juliana v. united states, was featured last year in a netflix documentary. legal experts described the ruling as a landmark decision   one that could influence policy and litigation elsewhere around the country. “i think this is the strongest decision on climate change ever issued by any court,” michael gerrard, faculty director of columbia university’s sabin center for climate change law, which tracks climate litigation across the globe, said on x, formerly known as twitter. in addition to finding that the young people have a right to a stable climate, gerrard noted, seeley found that fossil fuel use is the principal cause of climate change and that alternative fuels can provide an economically sustainable substitute. the montana ruling represents the first time a court has found that a constitutional right to a clean and healthful environment includes the right to a safe climate, said maya van rossum, an attorney who leads the delaware riverkeeper network and works to enact environmental provisions in state constitutions. “the oil and gas industry, and their friends in montana’s government, are now on notice that the people of montana have the higher power of the constitution to help them ensure protection of their climate,” van rossum said. montana and two other states   pennsylvania and new york   affirm the right to a clean environment in their constitutions, and van rossum said the ruling will help other states that are considering similar provisions. “creating an affirmative duty to ensure environmental rights are protected is an important legal recognition that strengthens the ability of government to address climate change,” she said. seeley’s ruling is largely a procedural victory, said patrick parenteau, a law professor emeritus at vermont law and graduate school. last august, seeley rejected a request from the youth that she order the state to develop a remedial plan to tackle climate change, saying she did not have the authority. but in her decision, seeley expressed optimism that the ruling would “influence the state’s conduct” by invalidating the state laws that prevent climate analysis, parenteau added. and if the decision is upheld by the montana supreme court, he said, it will be a “landmark in u.s. climate litigation.” the ruling suggests a potent role for the judiciary, just as an array of lawsuits against the fossil fuel industry are poised to go to trial in state courts from hoboken to honolulu. more than a dozen cities, counties and states are suing major oil giants for their contributions to climate change. “the case in montana is a clear sign that seeking climate justice through the courts is a viable and powerful strategy,” said delta merner, lead scientist at the science hub for climate litigation at the union of concerned scientists, which provides scientific evidence for climate litigation cases. “whether it’s governments, fossil fuel companies or industry trade groups   holding polluters and their enablers accountable is a critical piece of meaningful climate action.” merner added that the case is a “clear win for climate science.” seeley’s 103 page decision delves deeply into the science, including a graphic of the “keeling curve,” charles keeling’s eponymous curve that shows a long term trend of rising carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere. her ruling followed a full week of testimony in her helena courtroom by a parade of experts who testified on behalf of the youth about the effects of climate change on montana’s iconic glaciers and trout streams. seeley wrote that she found the scientific witnesses who testified for the youth “informative and credible.” and she said there is “overwhelming scientific consensus that earth is warming as a direct result of human [greenhouse gas] emissions, primarily from the burning of fossil fuels.” attorneys for the state, which presented only one outside witness, downplayed montana’s contribution to climate change, saying it is a global problem and the state can’t do much to prevent it. but seeley rejected that argument, finding that the state’s greenhouse gas contributions are not minimal, but “nationally and globally significant.” she added that montana’s emissions “cause and contribute to climate change and plaintiffs’ injuries and reduce the opportunity to alleviate plaintiffs’ injuries.” until greenhouse gases are reduced, she wrote, “extreme weather events and other climactic events such as droughts and heatwaves will occur more frequently and in greater magnitude, and plaintiffs will be unable to live clean and healthy lives in montana.” marco simons, general counsel of earthrights international, which represents colorado communities suing the oil and gas industry, said it was “especially important” that seeley found that the youth had the standing to challenge state laws and policies because they are being harmed by climate change. “the court’s ruling fully recognizes the reality of climate change,” he said, calling it a significant victory for climate litigation. in montana, the young people who testified in the case or sat on wooden benches in the courtroom watching the seven day trial, celebrated seeley’s decision. “this ruling, this case, it is truly historic. we are heard!” said kian tanner, who testified that the state’s increasingly hot summers and more frequent wildfires were interfering with where he feels “most at home”   the soccer pitch. “frankly the elation and joy in my heart is overwhelming in the best way,” said tanner, who was 14 in 2020 when the lawsuit was filed. “we set the precedent not only for the united states, but for the world.” the youth led climate group sunrise movement, which tweeted support for the 16 young activists behind the climate case during the trial, said monday that the victory proves that “gen z is a powerful force in the fight against the climate crisis and we won’t be stopped.” “mark my words: from courthouses to statehouses to the ballot box in 2024, our generation is taking over,” said varshini prakash, the group’s executive director. no related posts. request a free trial to receive unlimited access to the transformation of the energy sector. policy. science. business. congress. legislation. politics. the leader in energy and environment news. late breaking news. © politico, llc

copyright 2025 the associated press. all rights reserved. file   a beachgoer walks down waikiki beach, thursday, oct. 15, 2020, in honolulu. about two years after 13 children and teens in hawaii sued the state over the threat posed by climate change, both sides reached a settlement that includes an ambitious requirement to decarbonize hawaii’s transportation system in the next 21 years. (ap photo/marco garcia, file) file   hawaii gov. josh green speaks at a news conference in honolulu on friday, dec. 15, 2023. hawaii’s governor and lawyers for youth plaintiffs on thursday, june 20, 2024, announced they settled a lawsuit alleging hawaii violated the state constitution by operating a transportation system that harmed the climate and infringed upon the children’s right to a clean and healthy environment..(ap photo/audrey mcavoy, file) file   heavy traffic is seen monday, dec. 28, 2009 in kailua, hawaii on the island of oahu. about two years after 13 children and teens in hawaii sued the state over the threat posed by climate change, both sides reached a settlement that includes an ambitious requirement to decarbonize hawaii’s transportation system in the next 21 years. (ap photo/marco garcia, file) file   a beachgoer walks down waikiki beach, thursday, oct. 15, 2020, in honolulu. about two years after 13 children and teens in hawaii sued the state over the threat posed by climate change, both sides reached a settlement that includes an ambitious requirement to decarbonize hawaii’s transportation system in the next 21 years. (ap photo/marco garcia, file) file   a beachgoer walks down waikiki beach, thursday, oct. 15, 2020, in honolulu. about two years after 13 children and teens in hawaii sued the state over the threat posed by climate change, both sides reached a settlement that includes an ambitious requirement to decarbonize hawaii’s transportation system in the next 21 years. (ap photo/marco garcia, file) file   hawaii gov. josh green speaks at a news conference in honolulu on friday, dec. 15, 2023. hawaii’s governor and lawyers for youth plaintiffs on thursday, june 20, 2024, announced they settled a lawsuit alleging hawaii violated the state constitution by operating a transportation system that harmed the climate and infringed upon the children’s right to a clean and healthy environment..(ap photo/audrey mcavoy, file) file   hawaii gov. josh green speaks at a news conference in honolulu on friday, dec. 15, 2023. hawaii’s governor and lawyers for youth plaintiffs on thursday, june 20, 2024, announced they settled a lawsuit alleging hawaii violated the state constitution by operating a transportation system that harmed the climate and infringed upon the children’s right to a clean and healthy environment..(ap photo/audrey mcavoy, file) file   heavy traffic is seen monday, dec. 28, 2009 in kailua, hawaii on the island of oahu. about two years after 13 children and teens in hawaii sued the state over the threat posed by climate change, both sides reached a settlement that includes an ambitious requirement to decarbonize hawaii’s transportation system in the next 21 years. (ap photo/marco garcia, file) file   heavy traffic is seen monday, dec. 28, 2009 in kailua, hawaii on the island of oahu. about two years after 13 children and teens in hawaii sued the state over the threat posed by climate change, both sides reached a settlement that includes an ambitious requirement to decarbonize hawaii’s transportation system in the next 21 years. (ap photo/marco garcia, file) honolulu (ap)   about two years after 13 children and teens sued hawaii over the threat posed by climate change, both sides reached a settlement that includes an ambitious requirement to decarbonize the state’s transportation system over the next 21 years. it’s another example of a younger generation channeling their frustration with the government’s response to the climate crisis into a legal battle. navahine v. hawaii department of transportation is the world’s first youth led constitutional climate case addressing climate pollution from the transportation sector, according to statements from both sides. the lawsuit said one plaintiff, a 14 year old native hawaiian, was from a family that farmed taro for more than 10 generations. however, extreme droughts and heavy rains caused by climate change have reduced crop yields and threatened her ability to continue the cultural practice. the complaint said rising sea levels also threaten to put their lands underwater. another plaintiff lost her home twice, due to climate change induced events, according to our children’s trust, a public interest law firm that is representing the plaintiffs: flooding from a hurricane in 2018 and last year’s deadly wildfire that ravaged lahaina, on the island of maui. here are some things to know about the historic settlement: circuit court judge of the first circuit john m. tonaki signed a settlement agreement thursday between the plaintiffs, who are also represented by another law firm, earthjustice, and the state of hawaii and its department of transportation. the lawsuit argued that hawaii was violating the state constitution by operating a transportation system that harms the climate and infringes upon the right to a clean and healthy environment. it accused the department of transportation of consistently prioritizing building highways over other types of transportation. the burning of fossil fuels   oil, gas and coal   is the main contributor to global warming caused by human activity. hawaii is the state that most depends on petroleum, according to our children’s trust. a key term of the settlement requires hawaii to achieve zero greenhouse gas emissions across all transportation modes, including ground transportation and sea and air interisland transportation, “no later than 2045.” the state must also come up with a greenhouse gas reduction plan within a year. the transportation department must complete pedestrian, bicycle and transit networks in coordination with hawaii counties within five years, while dedicating at least $40 million to expanding the public electric vehicle charging network by 2030. the settlement terms may seem ambitious, but as an isolated island chain the middle of the pacific, hawaii is on the “front lines” of climate disasters, our children’s trust attorney andrea rodgers told the associated press on friday. “they really have no choice but to step up and address the climate crisis in order to protect their residents and young people who want to live here,” she said. also under the settlement, hawaii will be accountable to a judge who will enforce the agreement if disputes arise. the lawsuit, filed in june 2022, had been scheduled to go to trial next week. the state is not admitting any liability or wrongdoing by settling. the parties said the settlement was also the first of its kind between a state government and youth plaintiffs to address constitutional issues arising from climate change. rodgers is also involved in similar legal battles in montana and oregon, however. the montana case prevailed at trial, when a judge ruled last year that state agencies were violating the constitutional right to a clean and healthy environment by allowing fossil fuel development. early this year, the state supreme court declined a government request to block the ruling pending appeal. oral arguments before the high court are set for july 10. in the oregon case, a federal appeals court panel rejected a long running lawsuit brought by young climate activists challenging the u.s. government’s role in climate change. the case is still at the 9th u.s. circuit court of appeals. overseas, six young adults and children from portugal are arguing before the european court of human rights that governments across the continent are not doing enough to protect people from climate change. while gov. josh green, director of transportation ed sniffen and plaintiffs’ attorneys all celebrated the settlement, it was a hard fought battle. “the defendants aggressively defended the case,” rodgers said. the state spent nearly $3 million on an out of state law firm and other costs, including expert witness fees. the attorney general’s office said it remained the lead on the case despite help from the outside firm. the state initially moved to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that the court “cannot coopt legislative and executive power by issuing an injunction ordering hdot to create new regulatory programs.” the state also had to agree that depositions of plaintiffs would be conducted with the sensitivity appropriate for their ages, rodgers said. “there was resistance,” rodgers said of reaching the settlement. “but at the end of the day, gov. green and ... sniffen displayed incredible leadership and made the decision to work with the youth and not against them.” implementation over the next 21 years will require both commitment from hawaii’s leaders and involvement by young people, rodgers said. there will also have to be a cultural shift in hawaii, which is car dependent and has bad traffic. “i think once people start seeing the investments that are needed to be done into the bike, pedestrian and transit assets, people are really going to start seeing that this is a system that works better for hawaii and for the community,” rodgers said. “having youth voices a part of this process will be essential,” she added. read more of ap’s climate coverage at http://www.apnews.com/climate and environment copyright 2025 the associated press. all rights reserved.

amy beth hanson, associated press amy beth hanson, associated press leave your feedback helena, mont. (ap)   montana’s supreme court on wednesday upheld a landmark climate ruling that said the state was violating residents’ constitutional right to a clean environment by permitting oil, gas and coal projects without regard for global warming. the justices, in a 6 1 ruling, rejected the state’s argument that greenhouse gases released from montana fossil fuel projects are minuscule on a global scale and reducing them would have no effect on climate change, likening it to asking: “if everyone else jumped off a bridge, would you do it too?” watch: young activists in montana win landmark climate change lawsuit against state the plaintiffs can enforce their environmental rights “without requiring everyone else to stop jumping off bridges or adding fuel to the fire,” chief justice mike mcgrath wrote for the majority. “otherwise the right to a clean and healthful environment is meaningless.” only a few other states, including hawaii, illinois, pennsylvania, massachusetts and new york, have similar environmental protections enshrined in their constitutions. the lawsuit filed in 2020 by 16 montanans  who are now ages 7 to 23   was considered a breakthrough in attempts by young environmentalists and their attorneys to use the courts to leverage action on climate change. “this ruling is a victory not just for us, but for every young person whose future is threatened by climate change,” lead plaintiff rikki held said in a statement wednesday. during the 2023 trial in state district court, the young plaintiffs described how climate change profoundly affects their lives: worsening wildfires foul the air they breathe, while drought and decreased snowpack deplete rivers that sustain farming, fish, wildlife and recreation and affect native traditions. going forward, montana must “carefully assess the greenhouse gas emissions and climate impacts of all future fossil fuel permits,” said melissa hornbein, an attorney with the western environmental law center and attorney for the plaintiffs. republican gov. greg gianforte said the state was still reviewing the decision, but warned of “perpetual lawsuits that will waste taxpayer dollars and drive up energy bills for hardworking montanans.” “this decision does nothing more than declare open season on montana’s all of the above approach to energy,” he said, which promotes using both fossil fuels and renewables. a day earlier, gianforte held meetings on how the state can increase energy production, which involved energy suppliers, large energy consumers, public utility companies, transmission stakeholders and legislators. incoming senate president matt regier and house speaker brandon ler, both republicans, joined gianforte in alleging the justices were overstepping their authority and had strayed into making policy. “judicial reform was already a top priority for republican lawmakers,” regier and ler said, warning the justices to “buckle up.” montana courts have blocked or overturned numerous laws passed by republicans in the 2021 and 2023 legislative sessions as being unconstitutional, including laws to limit access to abortion. in seeking to overturn the district court ruling, the state had argued the plaintiffs should be required to challenge individual fossil fuel development permits as they’re issued   which would have involved trying to challenge even smaller amounts of emissions. carbon dioxide, which is released when fossil fuels are burned, traps heat in the atmosphere and is largely responsible for the warming of the climate. june brought record warm global temperatures for the 13th straight month, according to european climate service copernicus. the streak ended in july. montana’s constitution requires agencies to “maintain and improve” a clean environment. a law signed by gianforte last year said environmental reviews may not consider climate impacts unless the federal government makes carbon dioxide a regulated pollutant. the montana supreme court’s ruling found that law to be unconstitutional. left: file photo: supporters gather at a theater next to the courthouse to watch court proceedings for the nation's first youth climate change trial at montana's first judicial district court on june 12, 2023 in helena, montana. photo by william campbell/getty images by amy beth hanson, associated press by amy beth hanson, matthew brown, associated press by matthew brown, amy beth hanson, associated press by amy beth hanson, matthew brown, associated press amy beth hanson, associated press amy beth hanson, associated press support provided by: learn more thank you. please check your inbox to confirm. © 1996   2025 newshour productions llc. all rights reserved. pbs is a 501(c)(3) not for profit organization. sections about stay connected thank you. please check your inbox to confirm. learn more about friends of the news hour. support for news hour provided by

robin loznak/zuma this story was originally published by the guardian and is reproduced here as part of the climate desk collaboration. hawaii officials have announced a “groundbreaking” legal settlement with a group of young climate activists, which they said will force the state’s department of transportation to move more aggressively towards a zero emission transportation system. “you have a constitutional right to fight for life sustaining climate policy and you have mobilized our people in this case,” josh green, the hawaii governor, told the 13 young plaintiffs in the case, saying he hoped the settlement would inspire similar action across the country. under what legal experts called a “historic” settlement, announced on thursday, hawaii officials will release a roadmap “to fully decarbonize the state’s transportation systems, taking all actions necessary to achieve zero emissions no later than 2045 for ground transportation, sea, and inter island air transportation,” andrea rodgers, one of the attorneys representing the plaintiffs in the case, said at a press conference with the governor. “this is an extraordinary, unprecedented victory for the youth plaintiffs,” michael gerrard, the faculty director of the sabin center for climate change law at columbia university, told the guardian. “this is an extraordinary, unprecedented victory for the youth plaintiffs.” while hawaii has long embraced a progressive climate change agenda, with 2045 as a target year for decarbonization, the new settlement is “as big a deal as everyone said it is,” said denise antolini, an emeritus professor of law at the university of hawaii law school, who has followed climate change litigation for decades. “it’s written down, it’s enforceable, and that makes all in the difference in the world between a promise and actual implementation,” antolini said. the june 2022 lawsuit, navahine f v. hawaii department of transportation, was filed by 13 young people who claimed the state’s pro fossil fuel transportation policies violated their state constitutional rights. by prioritizing projects like highway expansion instead of efforts to electrify transit and promote walking and biking, the complaint says, the state created “untenable levels of greenhouse gas emissions.” as a result, state officials harmed the plaintiffs’ ability to “live healthful lives in hawaii now and into the future,” and violated the right to a clean and healthful environment guaranteed by the state’s constitution, the litigation argued. it named the hawaii department of transportation and its director, as well as the state of hawaii and its former governor david ige, as defendants. the plaintiffs, most of whom are indigenous, alleged that by contributing to the climate crisis, the state hastened the “decline and disappearance of hawaii’s natural and cultural heritage.” when the case was filed, the plaintiffs were between the ages of nine and 18. several of the plaintiffs, many of whom are being identified only by their first names, spoke at the press conference. “a great thing to talk about is the kind of hope this brings to us. for many of us, it’s kind of been our whole life we’re seeing our beaches falling into the water, and our coral reefs disappearing,” said lucina, one 17 year old plaintiff. navahine, whose name is on the lawsuit, is a 16 year old native hawaiian whose family has been farming the land “for 10 generations.” drought, flooding, and sea level rise were all having immediate effects on her family’s crops, she said. “seeing the effects, how we were struggling to make any money for our farm, kind of pushed me to this case,” she said. officials said the legal settlement brings together activists with all three branches of the state’s government to focus on meeting climate change goals, including mobilizing the judicial branch. the court will oversee the settlement agreement through 2045 or until the state reaches its zero emission goals, rodgers said. “we have extremely tough goals to hit by 2045 and this is going to make sure we move forward much faster,” ed sniffen, the head of the state’s transportation department said at a press conference. state officials often claim hawaii is a climate leader. in 2015, it became the first us state to require its electric utilities to zero out its power sector emissions by 2045 a tall order in a state that has historically obtained most of its energy from oil and coal. the state legislature has also passed a goal of decarbonizing the transportation sector. and hawaii’s 2050 sustainability plan calls to make all state vehicles carbon free by 2035. but the state has moved in the wrong direction. between 2020 and 2021, carbon emissions in hawaii increased by more than 16%. the plaintiffs say hawaii’s department of transportation has missed every interim benchmark to reduce its planet warming emissions since 2008. and per capita, hawaii emits more carbon than 85% of countries on earth, attorneys wrote in the 2022 lawsuit. the suit came as part of a series of youth led constitutional climate cases brought by the non profit law firm our children’s trust. earlier this year, the firm notched a major win when montana’s supreme court upheld a groundbreaking decision requiring state regulations to consider the climate crisis before approving permits for fossil fuel development. environmental law experts said that the youth climate lawsuit strategy, which has been ongoing since 2011, has faced an uphill battle in many states. “until last year’s trial in montana and today’s settlement in hawaii, none of them had succeeded,” gerrard said, noting that both hawaii and montana “have a right to a clean environment written into their constitution.” but hawaii’s environmental court judges took the case seriously, fast tracking it towards a trial, which helped provide pressure for the state to settle, antolini said. the leadership of green, who became hawaii’s governor in december 2022, was also important. “in none of the prior cases was the defendant state government willing to budge an inch; but here the governor embraced the plaintiffs’ claims and agreed to a wide ranging court order,” gerrard said. the hawaii settlement is significant because it is one of the first major cases “laser focused on transportation,” which is responsible for a large portion of greenhouse gas emissions, but “tends to get ignored,” antolini said. the cooperative nature of the legal agreement, which promises to include young people in advisory roles, and brings together government officials, lawyers, policy makers, and teenagers, is also noteworthy, antolini said, and appropriate for “an island community like hawaii” where people know “we’re in the boat together.” our children’s trust also has pending litigation in alaska, florida, utah, and virginia. a federal lawsuit it filed in december against the us environmental protection agency is also pending. last month, a federal appeals court granted the biden administration’s request to strike down another federal lawsuit filed by our children’s trust, juliana v. united states. by signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from mother jones and our partners. mother jones was founded to do journalism differently. we stand for justice and democracy. we reject false equivalence. we go after stories others don’t. we’re a nonprofit newsroom, because the kind of truth telling investigations we do doesn’t happen under corporate ownership. and the essential ingredient that makes all this possible? readers like you. it’s reader support that enables mother jones to devote the time and resources to report the facts that are too difficult, expensive, or inconvenient for other news outlets to uncover. please help with a donation today if you can even a few bucks will make a real difference. a monthly gift would be incredible. mother jones was founded to do journalism differently. we stand for justice and democracy. we reject false equivalence. we go after stories others don’t. we’re a nonprofit newsroom, because the kind of truth telling investigations we do doesn’t happen under corporate ownership. and the essential ingredient that makes all this possible? readers like you. it’s reader support that enables mother jones to devote the time and resources to report the facts that are too difficult, expensive, or inconvenient for other news outlets to uncover. please help with a donation today if you can even a few bucks will make a real difference. a monthly gift would be incredible. dharna noor nathalie baptiste oliver milman naveena sadasivam ian gordon samantha michaels sarah szilagy david corn and dan friedman samantha michaels nina martin aviva stahl isabela dias by signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from mother jones and our partners. save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights. help mother jones' reporters dig deep with a tax deductible donation. award winning photojournalism. stunning video. fearless conversations. by signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from mother jones and our partners. this site is protected by recaptcha and the google privacy policy and terms of service apply. privacy manager copyright © 2025 mother jones and the center for investigative reporting. all rights reserved. can you pitch in a few bucks to help fund mother jones' investigative journalism? we're a nonprofit (so it's tax deductible), and reader support makes up about two thirds of our budget. we noticed you have an ad blocker on. can you pitch in a few bucks to help fund mother jones' investigative journalism? we’re a nonprofit newsroom, because the truth telling investigations we do don’t happen under corporate ownership. we get to shine a bright light into the dark corners of power and report stories other media are afraid to touch. the essential ingredient that makes this possible? readers like you. we’ve got a lot of hard, consequential work to do in the weeks and months ahead, and we can’t do it without reader support. please stand up for independent media and make a donation today. we’re a nonprofit newsroom, because the truth telling investigations we do don’t happen under corporate ownership. we get to shine a bright light into the dark corners of power and report stories other media are afraid to touch. the essential ingredient that makes this possible? readers like you. we’ve got a lot of hard, consequential work to do in the weeks and months ahead, and we can’t do it without reader support. please stand up for independent media and make a donation today. sign up for the free mother jones daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

conservation law foundation july 9, 2024 | claire holding youth around the world have been pushing for more action, both in the streets and in the courts. pictured, a 2019 march in boston. photo credit: bethany kwoka in june, the state of hawai’i agreed to cut carbon emissions in a historic climate case settlement. this is a big win   not just for the hawaiian youth who brought the lawsuit but also for communities here in new england and beyond. by now, it is no secret that we need to reduce our carbon pollution drastically. carbon (or co2) is released when we burn coal, oil, and gas. scientists call it a “greenhouse gas,” meaning it causes the earth to overheat. decades of carbon pollution are largely responsible for the catastrophic climate change facing us now. many of us already feel the effects of climate change. in new england, extreme precipitation events have increased by 60% since the 1950s, our coastal communities are being flooded from sea level rise, and (as recent weeks have clearly shown) temperatures are shooting upwards. this is all bad enough, but for young people like myself, the true danger lies in our future: intense storms, heavy flooding, and unbearable temperatures are only expected to increase, threatening our infrastructure, ecosystems, and livelihoods. facing these facts, young environmental activists have brought suits against state and federal governments for failing to limit carbon pollution. the recent settlement arising from navahine v. hawai’i department of transportation is one such case, providing hope for a savvy litigation strategy and climate progress possible back home. in 2022, 13 young people filed a suit against the hawai’i department of transportation, the governor, and the state government. with legal assistance from nonprofit environmental groups like our children’s trust and earthjustice, the youth argued that the state violated their constitutional right to a “clean and healthful environment” by operating transportation projects that cause heavy carbon pollution. after a judge denied the state’s motion to dismiss the case, the state finally agreed to reduce its pollution. under the agreement, the state pledged to completely cut all carbon emissions from ground transportation and interisland sea and air transportation by 2045. notably, the state also created a volunteer youth council to advise the government on climate commitments in the years to come. the navahine settlement marks the first time a state has directly recognized that the transportation sector’s carbon pollution violates constitutional rights. while the hawaiian youth based their argument around an environmental clause specific to their state constitution, multiple other states (including massachusetts) have similar language that could open the door to similar litigation in the future. the navahine resolution also provides strong support for another youth led climate case regarding the federal constitution, juliana v. united states. for the past nine years, 21 young americans supported by our children’s trust have been suing the federal government for knowingly allowing pollution that contributes to the planet’s overheating. in march of this year, clf submitted an amicus (“friend of the court”) brief supporting the youth plaintiffs. recently, the ninth circuit ordered the district court to dismiss juliana, preventing the case from going to trial. in june, clf signed onto another amicus brief supporting a petition for rehearing in hopes of encouraging the court to reconsider. with the fate of this critical case pending, the navahine decision adds to the growing recognition of right based climate protection for youth, providing increased pressure and momentum for continued consideration of the juliana case. beyond litigation, the pollution reduction plans crafted as part of the navahine settlement can help provide a roadmap for progress in cities in new england and beyond. as we work to make our own transportation systems and societies at large more environmentally friendly, we can and should learn from each other’s successes. the youth of the navahine and juliana cases are moving the needle on climate activism and litigation. they remind us that a safe and healthy future is a right for us all, and they will not sit back and let that be taken away. we shouldn’t either. get involved: claire holding is a student at amherst college. she was a strategic litigation intern at conservation law foundation in the summer of 2024. before you go... clf is working every day to create real, systemic change for new england’s environment. and we can’t solve these big problems without people like you. will you be a part of this movement by considering a contribution today? if everyone reading our blog gave just $10, we’d have enough money to fund our legal teams for the next year. our members are the reason we can bring cases to court. add your name to join. all climate change connecticut maine massachusetts national new hampshire rhode island vermont all zero by 2050 more news the views and opinions expressed on this blog do not necessarily represent the opinions or positions of conservation law foundation, our boards, or our supporters. previous post zeyneb magavi has a down to earth plan for home heating next post the truth about reduced fares: transforming transportation $25 $50 $75 $100 other donate copyright ©2024 conservation law foundation about our team how you can help employment & internships privacy & commenting policies financials updates newsroom action center conservation matters publications contact clf 617.350.0990 e info@clf.org supporter center press inquiries:mike naughton tel: 617.850.1709 press@clf.org 62 summer stboston, ma 02110

sign up for prism’s newsletter to get first access to news and analysis that makes you think and act. developed alongside people on the frontlines of injustice, prism will help deepen your understanding on the most pressing issues of our time. prism justice requires the full story in a bold move to combat climate change, young activists are turning to the courts, filing lawsuits against the government to secure a livable future even though they’re too young to vote. since 2016, young people have taken federal, state, and local governments to court for what they allege is a willful denial of inalienable rights and support of a fossil fuel industry, no matter the costs. addressing the climate crisis, by most measures, has never been more urgent. scientists say that we have until 2030 to limit warming to 1.5 degrees celsius or else face a cascading set of ecological consequences from which we may never recover. the work is two fold: repairing the harm of extraction of fossil fuels made possible by colonial expansion, and mitigating the symptoms of a warming planet more destructive storms and wildfires, depletion of topsoil, and ever expanding drought conditions, to name a few. yes, fossil fuel corporations hold much of the responsibility for peddling a product that they knew would poison the planet (at least 28 states and municipalities are taking these corporations to court), but youth plaintiffs say it was the federal government that allowed these companies to operate, rake in windfall profits, and escape culpability. in doing so, plaintiffs allege that the government permitted a violation of their constitutional rights, all while the climate crisis wages on. this has been a big summer for youth climate cases. so, where do they stand? here’s a rundown to help simplify things: in 2015, 21 youth brought a landmark lawsuit against the u.s. for denying their rights to due process and for violating the public trust doctrine. this was the first time that young people took the federal government to court for supporting the fossil fuel industry, seeking a declaration from the court that their rights were violated as well as a court order preventing the government from continuing those harms by producing a plan to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. while the science illustrating the cause and effect of burning fossil fuels and rapidly changing the planet’s climate system has been available since the 1960s, and proof of this dynamic has been available since the 1980s, no one previously attempted to hold the government accountable in this way. even the presiding judge acknowledged the case’s extraordinary nature, writing, “this is no ordinary lawsuit.” but the case has never made it to trial. the obama, trump, and biden administrations hampered the case at every turn, preventing it from reaching the trial phase that was initially scheduled for february 2018 and then bumped to october 2018. after years of legal back and forth, the biden administration’s department of justice attempted a rare legal move on may 1 called a writ of mandamus, allowing a higher court to throw the case out without a trial. even more surprising, the writ contradicted a lower court’s decision for the case to proceed “on the merits” or based on the evidence outlined in filings. the plaintiffs asked for the judges on the 9th circuit court of appeals to reconsider their ruling. in late june, dozens of members of congress filed an amicus brief with an appeals court supporting the youths’ request for review, saying that allowing the case to proceed is tantamount to fulfilling the promise of the constitution, separation of powers, and the court’s central role as a “neutral arbiter.” in july, the appeals court denied the petition for review. according to julia olson, one of the case’s lead attorneys, the repeated attempts to thwart juliana v. united states illustrated the unique harms suffered by the plaintiffs simply because of their age. “adults continue to discriminate against young people in profoundly harmful ways, and this ruling greenlights these harms,” olson said in a press release. in other words, there is no way for a young person experiencing climate change to object to the forces that protract it. on july 10, counsel for the 16 plaintiffs in the historic youth led constitutional climate case, held v. state of montana, presented oral arguments before the montana supreme court defending the 2023 decision from district court judge kathy seeley in favor of the plaintiffs. judge seeley’s ruling declared that montana’s laws, which had previously required the state to turn a blind eye to young people’s climate injuries while promoting fossil fuel activities, were unconstitutional. during oral arguments to the supreme court, a lawyer for the youth plaintiffs reiterated much of the testimony from expert witnesses from the previous summer’s seven day trial: that the state’s permitting system did not allow the government to consider climate impacts, that climate impacts denied the youth’s state constitutional rights, and that the court system was the appropriate place to adjudicate the violation. in response, the state doubled down on previous arguments made in juliana and other youth climate cases, asserting that it’s the legislative branch rather than the courts that should handle what they describe as a “policy issue.” the state lawyers also argued that plaintiffs’ claims were too broad regarding the changes requested and the type of relief from climate pollution. rehashing the case illustrated how complex it can be for young plaintiffs to go to court. on the one hand, the state’s lawyers argued that climate change is a global issue resulting from policy decisions from multiple actors. most of the oil and gas that’s produced in montana exit the state, and much of the state’s transportation sector emissions result from operations that pass through its borders. so, not only is it not up to one court in one state to institute a plan to reduce greenhouse gas pollution, but how would a court decide what those emissions targets should be based on montana’s pollution contribution? as in juliana, lawyers in held v. state of montana assert that questions regarding contribution to emissions, facilitation of business productivity, and emissions impacts don’t preclude the court system from putting a stake in the ground. instead, the impact of emissions related activities are of constitutional concern because the status quo harms the rights of children. now, plaintiffs await a ruling from the state supreme court. a settlement agreement was reached on june 20 in the case of navahine v. hawaiʻi department of transportation, the first youth climate case to challenge emissions from a state transportation department. the case filed two years prior argued that the state agency jeopardized the youth’s constitutional rights by supporting a fossil  fuel based transportation system, with the transportation sector contributing to 60% of hawaiʻi’s total emissions. moreover, while the state committed to reaching net negative carbon emissions by 2045, there weren’t substantive details about how the target would be achieved. without intervention, the plaintiffs argued, the most fossil fuel dependent state in the country would continue to greenlight a transportation system that violated their rights to a clean and healthful environment while “endangering public trust resources that depend upon a stable climate system.” in the settlement agreement, the department of transportation committed to creating a comprehensive, substantive, and measurable plan to reduce emissions. this includes creating a unit within the transportation department to carry out the plan, establishing a youth advisory council, revising the transportation budgeting process, and accelerating the development of electric infrastructure, among other commitments. in december, 18 youth plaintiffs in california filed an equal protection constitutional lawsuit against the u.s. environmental protection agency (epa) for failing to act on climate change. they allege that the failure to account for the ways that climate change affects them is a form of discrimination against young people. lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that youth are particularly susceptible to injury from climate change driven catastrophes, such as wildfires, because their bodies and brains are still developing. not only are young people discriminated against in this way, they are also disenfranchised, lawyers argued. “they are politically and economically powerless in our constitutional democracy and cannot meaningfully participate in and influence the policy decisions that cause the climate crisis, discriminate against them, and irreversibly harm them for the remainder of their lives on earth,” the filing read. twice, once in march and then in may, the presiding district court judge granted a motion to dismiss based on defendants’ claims that the courts did not have the authority to grant relief or remedy for the claims of constitutional violation in the case. after filing an amended complaint in late may, lawyers for the youth plaintiffs are now preparing for oral arguments that the judge will hear on sept. 30. after that, the judge will determine the defendants’ third motion to dismiss. regarding youth climate lawsuits, the jury is still out on what a government owes to its people and what legal demands the people are entitled to make of its government. the science of climate change has been available since as early as the 1960s which means it’s older than most of the youth plaintiff’s parents. but it’s only recently that the consequences of this science declining soil health, decreasing pollinator populations, drought, wildfire, and hurricanes have become an undeniable reality. in addition to lawsuits challenging the government’s role in supporting a fossil fuel based economy, attribution science allows plaintiffs to take big oil to court. at least nine states and 18 other cities, counties, and tribes have ongoing cases against companies like exxonmobil or industry groups like the american petroleum institute for climate damages. of the 2,002 global climate cases, 1,426 have been filed in u.s. courts. ray levy uyeda is a staff reporter at prism, focusing on environmental and climate justice. find ray on twitter @raylevyuyeda. more by ray levy uyeda sign up for our newsletter to get updates that make you think and act directly to your inbox.

double your impact: for 50 years and through 14 presidential administrations, we have fought for clean water, clear air, and a healthy environment for all. we’re not stopping now. we are ready to fight back, and with your help, we can continue to make progress. give monthly today, and your support will be matched $1:$1 for 12 months. make a one time gift. choose an amount to give: your donation is tax deductible. earthjustice is a 501(c)3 nonprofit. more ways to give your 1st year of monthly gifts matched $1:$1. choose an amount to give: your donation is tax deductible. earthjustice is a 501(c)3 nonprofit. more ways to give gabriella demczuk we take on many of the biggest environmental and health challenges of our time and stick with them. the law makes change. because the earth needs a good lawyer. we take on many of the biggest environmental and health challenges of our time and stick with them. the law makes change. because the earth needs a good lawyer. press room victory transportation department commits to bold action to achieve 2045 zero emission goals marti townsend, earthjustice, (808) 372 1314, mtownsend@earthjustice.org helen britto, our children’s trust, (925) 588 1171, helen@ourchildrenstrust.org today, june 20, 2024, youth plaintiffs in the navahine v. hawaiʻi department of transportation constitutional climate suit joined hawaiʻi department of transportation (hdot) director edwin sniffen and governor josh green to announce and celebrate a groundbreaking agreement resolving the case. the settlement agreement, which the court has approved, recognizes children’s constitutional rights to a life sustaining climate and mobilizes hdot to plan and implement transformative changes of hawaiʻi’s transportation system to achieve zero emissions in all ground transportation, and interisland sea and air transportation, by 2045. the court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the agreement for the next 21 years until its terms have been achieved. navahine v. hawaiʻi department of transportation is the world’s first youth led constitutional climate case addressing climate pollution from the transportation sector. thirteen youth from across the hawaiian islands brought the case in june 2022, asserting their rights to a safe and healthy climate and asking the hawaiʻi state government to take necessary actions to meet the climate emergency and enable hawaiʻi’s paradigm shift to a climate safe, zero emissions transportation system. many of the navahine plaintiffs are native hawaiian youth who are already experiencing climate change harms like sea level rise, drought, floods, and fires, which have threatened their lives and their ability to practice cultural traditions such as kalo farming, fishing, and gathering. the settlement of navahine is also an historic first   the first settlement agreement of its kind, in which government defendants have decided to resolve a constitutional climate case in partnership with youth plaintiffs, committing to comprehensive changes and the systemic decarbonization of a state transportation system to reduce greenhouse gas pollution and fossil fuel dependence. in this case, hdot’s director, edwin sniffen took unprecedented leadership to negotiate a resolution and embrace the government’s kuleana (responsibility) to lead the way on bold and broad climate action. the agreement sets forth a framework that positions hawaiʻi among the leading states in the nation in moving from the legacy 20th century transportation system that depends on costly imported fossil fuels, to a cleaner, cheaper, and safer system that supports converting to vehicles that run on clean electricity and gives people more choices to get around by walking, cycling/scootering, and riding public transit. this framework offers an exemplary and replicable model for decarbonizing transportation systems around the u.s., and the world. the agreement recognizes climate rights and responsibilities, including the understanding that the state transportation system must be established and operated to “preserve, protect, and maintain hawaiʻi’s public trust resources and all hawaiʻi citizens’ right to a clean and healthful environment,” and that hdot will “take any actions necessary” to achieve zero emissions across all transportation modes within the state, including ground, sea, and air and interisland air transportation. the agreement also includes numerous provisions for immediate and ongoing action steps by hdot. these include, for example: the parties and the court agreed the court will maintain continuing jurisdiction over their agreement through 2045 to ensure implementation. statements from all parties follow. “i am so proud of all the hard work to get us to this historic moment. we got what we came for, and we got it faster than we expected. mai kuhihewa young people have the power to make a difference for their futures.”   navahine f., youth plaintiff “being heard and moving forward in unity with the state to combat climate change is incredibly gratifying, and empowering. this partnership marks a pivotal step towards preserving hawai‘i for future generations   one that will have a ripple effect on the world. i hope our case inspires youth to always use their voices to hold leaders accountable for the future they will inherit.”   rylee brooke k., youth plaintiff “hawai‘i’s young people raised their voices to protect our future here in the islands, and their voices were heard. today’s settlement shows that the state and hdot are committed to transformative action to reduce our transportation emissions before it’s too late. this new partnership puts climate action in the fast lane towards a more just and equitable future.”   leinā‘ala ley, senior associate attorney, earthjustice “the historic resolution of the navahine case came down to the spirit of leadership and partnership modeled by hdot director ed sniffen. hawai‘i has often led the way in setting goals, but this agreement gets us moving on real action. all journeys begin with a step, and we’re taking a huge one here for the moonshot mission of our generation.”   isaac moriwake, managing attorney, earthjustice mid pacific office “the 13 youth plaintiffs in navahine v. hawaiʻi department of transportation have just achieved the first settlement agreement in a constitutional climate case, paving the way for systemic decarbonization of transportation. one of the most intractable barriers to combatting the climate crisis is now being addressed head on, and this historic agreement offers a holistic roadmap for states and countries to follow around the world.”   andrea rodgers, deputy director, u.s. strategy, our children’s trust, co counsel for the navahine plaintiffs “our courts are essential guardians of children’s constitutional rights and empowered to protect the planet, but they rely on our collective engagement. navahine youth plaintiffs activated the courts and inspired true democracy in action   all three branches of government committing to work together to do what needs to be done according to best available science, to safeguard their futures. young people across the country and around the world will follow in their footsteps, carrying the same values of care, defense, and love of the land to action.”   julia olson, founder and chief legal counsel, our children’s trust “climate change is indisputable, burying our heads in the sand and making it the next generation’s problem is not pono. in our agreement with our children’s trust and earthjustice we’re committing to develop and use greenhouse gas emission measurements and reductions in vehicle miles traveled when we develop ground transportation projects and look for ways to translate that to our airports and harbors projects.”   ed sniffen, director of transportation “the passion demonstrated by these young people in advocating for a healthy, sustainable future for their generation and those to come, is laudable. this settlement informs how we as a state can best move forward to achieve life sustaining goals and further, we can surely expect to see these and other youth in hawaiʻi continue to step up to build the type of future they desire.”   governor josh green, m.d. earthjustice is the premier nonprofit environmental law organization. we wield the power of law and the strength of partnership to protect people's health, to preserve magnificent places and wildlife, to advance clean energy, and to combat climate change. we are here because the earth needs a good lawyer. “the health of communities and the health of your lungs aren’t subject to any do overs.” stay informed on how we hold accountable those who break our environmental laws. © 2025 earthjustice. we respect your privacy. earthjustice is a 501(c)3 nonprofit. your contribution is tax deductible. ein 94 1730465.
supported by the state agreed to take steps to cut greenhouse gas emissions from transportation. it’s the latest of several victories for youth led climate lawsuits. by david gelles the government of hawaii on thursday settled a lawsuit with a group of young people who had sued the state’s department of transportation over its use of fossil fuels. it was the latest in a series of victories around the world in cases filed by young plaintiffs. the case was brought in 2022 and organized by our children’s trust, a nonprofit organization that is pursuing similar cases in other states and federal courts, and earthjustice, an environmental law firm. last year a group in montana, also organized by our children’s trust, won their case against that state with a similar argument to the one presented in hawaii. the hawaii case alleged that, by depending on polluting fuels such as gasoline, the state’s department of transportation was violating hawaii’s constitution, which guarantees the “right to a clean and healthful environment.” the settlement, which was announced shortly before the case was to have gone to trial, requires the state to make a series of changes to reduce planet warming emissions. it also recognizes the constitutional rights of young people in the state to a clean and healthy environment. “we got what we came for, and we got it faster than we expected,” navahine f., the lead plaintiff in the suit, said in a statement. (some of the plaintiffs have not been publicly identified because of their age.) the settlement was approved by a court, and gov. josh green of hawaii announced the agreement alongside the youths who brought the case. “the passion demonstrated by these young people in advocating for a healthy, sustainable future for their generation and those to come, is laudable,” governor green said in a statement. “this settlement informs how we as a state can best move forward to achieve life sustaining goals.” the state said it would make a plan that would fully decarbonize its transportation system within 20 years and would soon begin work expanding bicycle lanes. it also plans to spend at least $40 million by 2030 installing electric vehicle chargers. “navahine youth plaintiffs activated the courts and inspired true democracy in action,” said julia olson, the founder of our children’s trust. but other parts of the transportation sector will be harder to decarbonize. the department of transportation oversees the state’s airports, and there are currently no feasible ways to power passenger jets without fossil fuels. the department also manages the state’s harbors, where container ships and cruise ships are also reliant on fossil fuels.