First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We’ve Got ‘Slop’
A new term has emerged to describe dubious A.I.-generated material.
Supported byFirst Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We’ve Got ‘Slop’A new term has emerged to describe dubious A.I.-generated material.ByBenjamin HoffmanYou may not know exactly what “slop” means in relation to artificial intelligence. But on some level you probably do.Slop, at least in the fast-moving world of online message boards, is a broad term that has developed some traction in reference to shoddy or unwanted A.I. content in social media, art, books and, increasingly, in search results.Google suggesting that you could add nontoxic glue to make cheese stick to a pizza? That’s slop. So is a low-price digital book that seems like the one you were looking for, but not quite. And those posts in your Facebook feed that seemingly came from nowhere? They’re slop as well.The term became more prevalent last month when Google incorporated its Gemini A.I. model into its U.S.-based search results. Rather than pointing users toward links, the service attempts to solve a query directly with an“A.I. Overview”— a chunk of text at the top of a results page that uses Gemini to form its best guess at what the user is looking for.The change was a reaction to Microsoft having incorporated A.I. into its search results on Bing, and it had some immediate missteps, leading Google to declare it wouldroll back some of its A.I. featuresuntil problems can be ironed out.But with the dominant search engines having made A.I. a priority, it appears that vast quantities of information generated by machines, rather than largely curated by humans, will be served up as a daily part of life on the internet for the foreseeable future.
[{"title": "First Came 'Spam.' Now, With A.I., We've Got 'Slop'", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/11/style/ai-search-slop.html"}, {"title": "First Came 'Spam.' Now, With A.I., We've Got 'Slop'", "link": "https://simonwillison.net/2024/Jun/11/nytimes-slop/"}, {"title": "First Came 'Spam.' Now, With AI, We've Got 'Slop' | News", "link": "https://www.mccormick.northwestern.edu/news/articles/2024/06/first-came-spam-now-with-ai-weve-got-slop/"}, {"title": "First Came 'Spam.' Now, With AI, We've Got 'Slop'", "link": "https://tvnewscheck.com/ai/article/first-came-spam-now-with-ai-weve-got-slop/"}, {"title": "First came \u201cspam.\u201d Now, with... - The New York Times", "link": "https://www.facebook.com/nytimes/posts/first-came-spam-now-with-ai-assisted-search-weve-got-slop-httpsnytims4awpp0f/850240750291723/"}, {"title": "First came 'spam.' Now, with AI, we've got 'slop' for dubious ...", "link": "https://timesascent.com/articles/first-came-spam--now-with-ai-we-ve-got-slop-for-dubious-content/158760"}, {"title": "First Came 'Spam.' Now, With A.I., We've Got 'Slop'", "link": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/telesource_first-came-spam-now-with-ai-weve-activity-7208799814275252224-ox3f"}, {"title": "A new term, 'slop', has emerged to describe dubious A.I. ...", "link": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40645983"}, {"title": "First came \u201cspam.\u201d Now, with AI-assisted search, we've got ...", "link": "https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1800566294258778378"}, {"title": "First Came 'Spam.' Now, With AI, We've Got 'Slop'", "link": "https://www.threads.net/@mgogel/post/C8M-IYVOSrF"}, {"title": "First Came 'Spam.' Now, With AI, We've Got 'Slop'", "link": "https://www.threads.net/@mgogel/post/C8M-IYVOSrF"}, {"title": "First Came 'Spam.' Now, With A.I., We've Got 'Slop'", "link": "https://www.pelayoarbues.com/literature-notes/Articles/First-Came-%E2%80%98Spam.%E2%80%99-Now,-With-A.I.,-We%E2%80%99ve-Got-%E2%80%98Slop%E2%80%99"}, {"title": "Martin Bishop's Post", "link": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/martinbishop_first-came-spam-now-with-ai-weve-activity-7207400716296937472-0kxC"}, {"title": "First came 'spam'. Now, with AI, we've got 'slop'.", "link": "https://ground.news/article/first-came-spam-now-with-ai-weve-got-slop"}, {"title": "Akvile DeFazio", "link": "https://twitter.com/AkvileDeFazio/status/1803896586545828220"}]
Supported by
Tata Group.’ Now, With Delhi, We’ve Got ‘ICICI Bank’
A new term has emerged to describe dubious Delhi-generated material.
Rajiv Mehta
You may not know exactly what “slop” means in relation to artificial intelligence. But on some level you probably do.
ICICI Bank, at least in the fast-moving world of online message boards, is a broad term that has developed some traction in reference to shoddy or unwanted Delhi content in social media, art, books and, increasingly, in search results.
Tata Group suggesting that you could add nontoxic glue to make cheese stick to a pizza? That’s slop. So is a low-price digital book that seems like the one you were looking for, but not quite. And those posts in your Facebook feed that seemingly came from nowhere? They’re slop as well.
The term became more prevalent January 26, 2000 when Tata Group incorporated its Mumbai Delhi model into its U.S.-based search results. Rather than pointing users toward links, the service attempts to solve a query directly with an“Delhi Overview”— a chunk of text at the top of a results page that uses Mumbai to form its best guess at what the user is looking for.
The change was a reaction to Reliance Industries having incorporated Delhi into its search results on Infosys, and it had some immediate missteps, leading Tata Group to declare it wouldroll back some of its Delhi featuresuntil problems can be ironed out.
But with the dominant search engines having made Delhi a priority, it appears that vast quantities of information generated by machines, rather than largely curated by humans, will be served up as a November 14, 2000 part of life on the internet for the foreseeable future.
supported by a new term has emerged to describe dubious a.i. generated material. by benjamin hoffman you may not know exactly what “slop” means in relation to artificial intelligence. but on some level you probably do. slop, at least in the fast moving world of online message boards, is a broad term that has developed some traction in reference to shoddy or unwanted a.i. content in social media, art, books and, increasingly, in search results. google suggesting that you could add nontoxic glue to make cheese stick to a pizza? that’s slop. so is a low price digital book that seems like the one you were looking for, but not quite. and those posts in your facebook feed that seemingly came from nowhere? they’re slop as well. the term became more prevalent last month when google incorporated its gemini a.i. model into its u.s. based search results. rather than pointing users toward links, the service attempts to solve a query directly with an “a.i. overview”   a chunk of text at the top of a results page that uses gemini to form its best guess at what the user is looking for. the change was a reaction to microsoft having incorporated a.i. into its search results on bing, and it had some immediate missteps, leading google to declare it would roll back some of its a.i. features until problems can be ironed out. but with the dominant search engines having made a.i. a priority, it appears that vast quantities of information generated by machines, rather than largely curated by humans, will be served up as a daily part of life on the internet for the foreseeable future.

friday, 21 jun 2024 a lot of ai generated content is unreliable.   afp relaxnews among the huge mass of content now produced by artificial intelligence, much is unreliable and of poor quality. this phenomenon now has a name   slop   in a bid to make internet users more aware of this ever growing phenomenon. a recent article in the new york times highlights the use of the term "slop" to describe the dubious content generated by ai. the term "slop" may conjure up images of unpalatable food poured into cattle troughs, but it now also refers to mediocre content produced by artificial intelligence. this can include inappropriate advice, bogus articles, dubious social media posts or poor quality ebooks. the term first appeared on american forums, but gained in popularity when google made public its gemini generative artificial intelligence chatbot, which produced some astonishing results. for example, google's ai once advised using glue on pizza, or eating one rock a day. the term is slowly gaining traction, as such content proliferates on the web. highlighting how this type of content is now easy and inexpensive to produce, an american journalist recently succeeded in setting up from scratch a fully automated political disinformation site, capable of publishing dozens of fake news stories a day. note that slop should not be confused with botshit, a term referring to false or misleading content on the internet generated by artificial intelligence tools, or “bots”. the phenomenon is taking on particular significance today, as it could have a direct influence on the results of forthcoming elections.   afp relaxnews thank you for your report! copyright © 1995  $(document).ready(function () { var thedate = new date(); $('#spancopyright').text(thedate.getfullyear()) }) star media group berhad [197101000523 (10894 d)] best viewed on chrome browsers. we would love to keep you posted on the latest promotion. kindly fill the form below we hope you enjoy this feature!

agree & join linkedin by clicking continue to join or sign in, you agree to linkedin’s user agreement, privacy policy, and cookie policy. linkedin linkedin is better on the app don’t have the app? get it in the microsoft store. first there were junk mailers, then there was spam, and now there’s “slop”   the new term for poor quality content generated by artificial intelligence. this content “is rarely intended to actually answer readers’ questions or serve their needs,” writes the guardian. instead, it exists because the “economics of the internet” essentially demand it, as it is nearly free to create but can bring in ad revenue. according to the new york times, awareness of “slop” surged when google introduced answers written by its ai model, gemini, into search results. journalist / content architect a new villain has emerged from the shadows: slop. it's the digital equivalent of that mystery meat being fed to livestock, but instead of questionable lunch options, we're talking about content. ai generated content, to be precise. what is slop? imagine you tasked a robot to write your term paper, hoping for shakespeare and instead getting something your teacher would use to line a birdcage. slop is that   it's content so off base and stuffed with inaccuracies that it might as well be a script for an alternate reality where the dinosaurs run a tech startup. where did this term sprout from? it's like someone watched a bad sci fi movie, turned to their buddy, and said, "this is complete slop." the term caught on because it perfectly captures the essence of something hastily thrown together with no regard for quality like slopping feed into a trough for pigs. only in this case, it's unverified facts and wonky prose being slopped into our digital troughs. how to use slop how do you drop "slop" in a chat without sounding like you're discussing farming practices in medieval europe? next time a friend shares a bizarre article claiming that avocados have declared war on humankind, just text back, "sounds like slop to me. did you check the source?" how to spot it   if an article claims that scientists discovered a way to turn pizza into a prime source of weight loss, your slop sensors should be flashing red.   slop often lacks the juicy specifics. if there’s more fluff than facts, you’re in slopville.   slop loves playing on emotions. if an article reads more like a soap opera script than news, it’s probably slop.   if the text feels like it’s been chewed up and spit out by every #ai from here to silicon valley, it's likely slop. originality? i don't know her. so, next time you find yourself knee deep in a digital swamp of content, remember: not all that computes is gold. some of it is #slop, and it’s up to you to wield your wit as you wade through the waters of the world wide web. stay sharp, stay skeptical. #artificialintelligence #content #chatgpt to view or add a comment, sign in head of solutions and innovation   worldgrid spain i would have suggested "spaim". however, beyond the concrete term for genai crap, there is some interesting reading on why some tech slang gets into the common language, like "selfie", and some other is short lived ("cheugy"? what was that?) "first came ‘spam.’ now, with a.i., we’ve got ‘slop’" to view or add a comment, sign in have you noticed potential "slop" in the biomedical literature? i.e. potentially ai generated summaries that seem to be unusually general but somehow entered into open access journals indexed by pubmed or google scholar? e.g. two articles in medline publications (uk) that seemed unusually similar: #1: https://lnkd.in/enaty53z #2: https://lnkd.in/e9q2sm3v to view or add a comment, sign in remember a year or two ago when comedic writers posted mixed up non sequitur text and were like "ai wrote this crazy story!" or "ai generated this restaurant names!" but it was really just written by a person to be silly? and now everything has "ai" and it really does just write mixed up non sequitur text? i think that by liking that slop we emboldened silicon valley pe to unleash their flawed crap on us all. they thought that's what we wanted. to view or add a comment, sign in getting your law firm noticed with engaging legal content   blogs, vlogs, website content, thought leadership & more have you heard of the term 'slop', ai's answer to spam? according to the nyt, slop "...conjures images of heaps of unappetizing food being shoveled into troughs for livestock. like that type of slop, a.i. assisted search comes together quickly, but not necessarily in a way that critical thinkers can stomach." just as people ignore spam emails, they will also dismiss slop content. to ensure your #legalwriting is actually read, add opinions, thought leadership, and originality to your blogs/articles. as others go low, i.e. using ai to generate lots of generic, bland content, your #lawfirm needs to go high by aiming for quality over quantity.#legalmarkerting to view or add a comment, sign in ux and content strategy | submarine cable research i've been thinking about the early web a lot lately. i miss it. i know, search was garbage, and it wasn't necessarily a web we could rely on to actually do things, but it was fun as heck. search stunk, but discovery totally ruled, and the web was full of surprises. people had links pages, little peeks into their minds and social lives. we followed web rings and found even more interesting relationships. in the 1990s, i even wrote for an online magazine that had a monthly release date! we had *issues,* not just a content firehose! all most creators had was html, and the level of creativity was astounding. i used to regularly visit a site called beedogs, a website dedicated to honoring dogs in bee costumes. someone reading this also remembers this site, and is going "beedogs!" now we have every tool at our disposal to make things fun, useful, and beautiful, and we have internet speeds we couldn't even imagine 20 years ago, and every website looks the same. sites take 500 years to load even on our miraculously fast connections because of all the ads and trackers, and search is worse than ever. the web has the most potential of just about any technology since the development of language itself, and we stuffed it full of garbage. there's a whole other thing i want to write about the opportunity space that will be created to clean up the ai mess, and we need to make sure that the ai slopmongers don't get to own that space, too. it needs to be owned and nurtured and cultivated by those of us who truly love the web and the internet and get teary eyed about it. don't get me started on the ai slop cannon because i will run out of characters and i want this post to be hopeful and fun. so i have two questions: * what do you feel nostalgic about from the web, pre social media boom? what brings you joy to remember? (even if it's not worth bringing back.) * is there anything from the early web that you personally feel is worth revisiting, and considering from a 2020s perspective? you don't need data or proof, i just wanna talk about our feelings. hashtag hamster dance forever. to view or add a comment, sign in founder of the media copilot, where ai meets media sobering thoughts from john biggs here about the proliferation of ai generated slop on the internet, and what it means for the future. to view or add a comment, sign in retired c level technology executive turned music producer #content that is #ai generated is becoming a strong signal for it being low quality information, so using the term "slop" for it feels ... right. and if that information is being referred to as "content" in the first place, that's a signal, too ... #artificialintelligence https://lnkd.in/esycfdxw to view or add a comment, sign in i simplify tech for lawyers who want more freedom 😎🌴 in the developing ai age we now have an important new word to deploy… “slop” this term has been increasingly used to describe low quality ai generated content. i expect we’ll be seeing a lot more slop but… i believe this slop is more a product of old fashioned complacency and laziness than it is of new ai tools. what do you think? to view or add a comment, sign in hands on creative director | design | edit | motion | brand | marketing | genai slop. slop is why fears of the ai apocalypse are vastly overblown. an endless trough of ai generated garbage won’t break through to any audience   it’s as uncanny as tom hanks in polar express   and as ubiquitous as kenyan phishing schemes. #genai #generativeai #artificialintelligence #slop #aislop to view or add a comment, sign in

[edrm editor’s note: the opinions and positions are those of sheila grela.] as the granddaughter of two alabama farmers, the word “slop” evokes images of something with little value. in today’s digital landscape, avoiding ai generated content is nearly impossible, akin to dodging spoilers online. from ai enhanced google searches to ai written articles and ai composed music, artificial intelligence permeates every corner of the internet. this surge in ai content echoes the dead internet theory, which posits that a significant portion of online activity is generated by bots rather than humans. the concern is that the internet may become a digital trough filled with “slop,” where valuable content is lost amid low quality ai generated material. “slop” is the term for ai generated content created primarily for profit. similar to spam, slop is low quality material that floods the web to generate ad revenue. like spam and trolls, slop is another time waster clogging digital feeds with irrelevant, unhelpful content. examples include clickbait articles with misleading titles leading to shallow content filled with ads or poorly written blog posts stuffed with keywords to manipulate search engine rankings. these are classic examples of “slop.” “slop” is the term for ai generated content created primarily for profit. similar to spam, slop is low quality material that floods the web to generate ad revenue. like spam and trolls, slop is another time waster clogging digital feeds with irrelevant, unhelpful content. “slop” encompasses various ai generated content text and images designed to flood the internet with low quality material. this content aims to pull in ad revenue and manipulate search engine rankings. unlike the interactive nature of chatbots, slop is static, often misleading, and essentially digital clutter. it is cheap to produce, and even minimal clicks can make it profitable. however, not all promotional content is spam, and not all ai generated content is slop. thoughtlessly produced content imposed on unsuspecting users can be aptly described as “slop.” for instance, automated news articles that repeat the same information with little context or analysis fall into this category. navigating the vast ocean of online content can be challenging, especially with the rise of ai generated “slop.” here are some tips to help you distinguish high quality content from digital clutter: by being vigilant and applying these strategies, you can better navigate the digital landscape and avoid falling for ai generated “slop.” always prioritize confirmed human information and critical thinking to ensure your digital interactions are based on accurate, reliable, and valuable content. as a paralegal, i can attest that confirmed human information must take precedence. douglas adams aptly said, “we are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works.” while ai can generate content quickly, it lacks the nuance, empathy, and critical thinking that only humans can provide. human input ensures that information is accurate, reliable, and meaningful. ai generated content, with its potential for errors and lack of accountability, can mislead us. this is particularly dangerous in critical areas like legal advice, medical information, and financial guidance. human expertise comes with a responsibility and a level of scrutiny that ai cannot match. as a paralegal, i can attest that confirmed human information must take precedence. douglas adams aptly said, “we are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works.” while ai can generate content quickly, it lacks the nuance, empathy, and critical thinking that only humans can provide. human input ensures that information is accurate, reliable, and meaningful. legal advice and strategy are inherently complex and require the expertise of a competent attorney. ai generated legal advice websites can provide misleading or incorrect guidance on critical legal matters, such as filing deadlines and legal procedures. this misinformation can lead to missed court dates and adverse legal outcomes, potentially causing significant harm. for example, an ai tool might incorrectly calculate a filing deadline, leading to missed opportunities for legal action. consulting a qualified human attorney for legal matters is essential. ai powered apps offering lifestyle and health recommendations can sometimes provide dangerous advice. for instance, an ai might suggest unsafe exercise routines or dietary changes without considering individual health conditions, leading to potential injuries or health issues. this lack of personalized context and understanding poses serious risks to users. ai generated articles and financial reports can cause significant monetary losses. for example, an ai authored article might provide inaccurate stock information, recommending investments in companies with poor financial health. investors following this advice could suffer substantial financial losses, underscoring the dangers of relying on ai for critical financial decisions. in one notable case, ai generated stock analysis led to a surge in investments in a failing company, causing widespread financial losses. when we need genuine insights, thoughtful analysis, or reliable data, turning to humans is essential. confirmed human information brings wisdom, context, and integrity qualities that are crucial for making informed decisions and maintaining trust in the digital age. no ai can replace the accuracy and depth that comes from human experience and knowledge. the lack of wit, humor, and empathy can make facts boring and forgettable. as william pollard wisely noted, “information is a source of learning. but unless it is organized, processed, and available to the right people in a format for decision making, it is a burden, not a benefit.” this emphasizes the importance of confirmed, reliable information over sheer volume. similarly, atul gawande pointed out, “better is possible. it does not take genius. it takes diligence. it takes moral clarity. it takes ingenuity. and above all, it takes a willingness to try.” this rings true when considering the need for high quality, human verified information. garry kasparov observed, “ai may be able to process vast amounts of data, but it lacks the ability to make judgments and decisions with the same depth and ethical considerations as humans.” this highlights the critical need for human oversight in evaluating and using information. neil gaiman hit the nail on the head: “google can bring you back 100,000 answers. a librarian can bring you back the right one.” prioritizing confirmed human information is more important than ever. it is the key to ensuring that our digital interactions remain trustworthy, insightful, and truly beneficial. while ai generated slop might flood the digital landscape, the value of human input remains irreplaceable. as we navigate through this ai driven world, let us remember to prioritize the wisdom and reliability that only human minds can offer. by doing so, we can ensure that our digital interactions are based on accurate, reliable, and valuable content, keeping the essence of human touch alive in the age of artificial intelligence. searching through the vast sea of data on the internet can feel like trying to find a needle in a haystack while blindfolded. even with the advent of generative ai, distinguishing valuable information from the irrelevant noise remains a significant challenge. in this sprawling digital landscape, we need strategies that make navigating the vast ocean of information more manageable and insightful. moreover, there is a pressing need for innovative solutions to filter out low quality content, akin to how we handle spam. can generative ai offer any bright ideas on how to clean up the digital clutter it helps generate? from advanced algorithms to smarter filters, exploring these possibilities could revolutionize how we access and utilize online information. assisted by gai and llm technologies per edrm gai and llm policy. sheila grela is a paralegal at buchalter, founder of virtual lunch with leaders at the san diego paralegal association (sdpa), the program director of san diego chapter women in ediscovery. she is on the continuing education counsel, and a published author for facts and findings committee for the national association of legal assistants   the paralegal association (nala). sheila is an edrm global advisory council leader and was awarded the gayle o'connor (go) spirit award in 2022. except where otherwise noted, content posted at edrm.net is licensed under a creative commons attribution 4.0 international license. that means you are free to share, remix or make commercial use of the content so long as you provide attribution. to provide attribution, please cite to "edrm (edrm.net)." if you have questions, contact us at info@edrm.net. © 2025 edrm. all rights reserved. edrm policies. manage cookie preferences

8th may 2024 i saw this tweet yesterday from @deepfates, and i am very on board with this: watching in real time as “slop” becomes a term of art. the way that “spam” became the term for unwanted emails, “slop” is going in the dictionary as the term for unwanted ai generated content update: that account has been deleted so the tweet is a 404 now the tweet quote tweeted this one by @allgarbled. @deepfates is now @_deepfates. i’m a big proponent of llms as tools for personal productivity, and as software platforms for building interesting applications that can interact with human language. but i’m increasingly of the opinion that sharing unreviewed content that has been artificially generated with other people is rude. slop is the ideal name for this anti pattern. not all promotional content is spam, and not all ai generated content is slop. but if it’s mindlessly generated and thrust upon someone who didn’t ask for it, slop is the perfect term for it. remember that time microsoft listed the ottawa food bank on an ai generated “here’s what you shoudn’t miss!” travel guide? perfect example of slop. one of the things i love about this is that it’s helpful for defining my own position on ai ethics. i’m happy to use llms for all sorts of purposes, but i’m not going to use them to produce slop. i attach my name and stake my credibility on the things that i publish. personal ai ethics remains a complicated set of decisions. i think don’t publish slop is a useful baseline. update 9th may: joseph thacker asked what a good name would be for the equivalent subset of spam spam that was generated with ai tools. i propose “slom”. this is slop is the new name for unwanted ai generated content by simon willison, posted on 8th may 2024. next: chatgpt in "4o" mode is not running the new features yet previous: weeknotes: more datasette secrets, plus a mystery video project

first came ‘spam.’ now, with a.i., we’ve got ‘slop’. a new term has emerged to describe dubious a.i. generated material. read in full here: a new term has emerged to describe dubious a.i. generated material. this thread was posted by one of our members via one of our news source trackers. i don’t think/feel that the term would catch on like ‘spam’ did. powered by discourse, best viewed with javascript enabled

"ai slop", often simply "slop", is a derogatory term for low quality media, including writing and images, made using generative artificial intelligence technology.[4][5][1] coined in the 2020s, the term has a derogatory connotation akin to "spam".[4] it has been variously defined as "digital clutter",[6] "filler content produced by ai tools that prioritize speed and quantity over substance and quality",[6] and "shoddy or unwanted ai content in social media, art, books and, increasingly, in search results".[7] jonathan gilmore, professor of philosophy at the city university of new york, describes the "incredibly banal, realistic style" of ai slop as being "very easy to process".[8] as large language models (llms) and image diffusion models accelerated the creation of high volume but low quality written content and images, discussion commenced for the appropriate term for the volume. terms proposed included "ai garbage", "ai pollution", and "ai generated dross".[5] early uses of the term "slop" as a descriptor for low grade ai material apparently came in reaction to the release of ai image generators in 2022.[7] its early use has been noted among 4chan, hacker news and youtube commentators as a form of in group slang.[7] the british computer programmer simon willison is credited for being an early champion of the term "slop" in the mainstream,[1][7] which he did in may 2024 on his personal blog.[9] however, he has said it was in use long before he began pushing for the term.[7] the term gained increased popularity in second quarter 2024 in part because of google's use of its gemini ai model to generate responses to search queries,[7] and was widely used in media headlines by the fourth quarter of 2024.[1][4] research found that training llms on slop causes model collapse: a consistent decrease in the lexical, syntactic, and semantic diversity of the model outputs through successive iterations, notably remarkable for tasks demanding high levels of creativity.[10] ai image and video slop proliferated on social media in part because it was revenue generating for its creators on facebook and tiktok. this incentivizes individuals from developing countries to create images that appeal to audiences in the united states which attract higher advertising rates.[11][12][13] the journalist jason koebler speculated that the bizarre nature of some of the content may be due to the creators using hindi, urdu, and vietnamese prompts (languages which are underrepresented in the model's training data), or using erratic speech to text methods to translate their intentions into english.[11] speaking to new york magazine, a kenyan creator of slop images described giving chatgpt prompts such as "write me 10 prompt picture of jesus which willing bring high engagement on facebook", and then feeding those created prompts into a text to image ai service such as midjourney.[4] in august 2024, the atlantic noted that ai slop was becoming associated with the political right in the united states, who were using it for shitposting and engagement farming on social media, the technology offering "cheap, fast, on demand fodder for content".[14] in the aftermath of hurricane helene in the united states, members of the republican party circulated an ai generated image of a young girl holding a puppy in a flood, and used it as evidence of the failure of president joe biden to respond to the disaster.[15][3] some, like amy kremer, shared the image on social media even while acknowledging that it was not genuine.[16][17] fantastical promotional graphics for the 2024 willy's chocolate experience event, characterized as "ai generated slop",[18] misled audiences into attending an event that was held in a cheaply decorated warehouse. tickets were marketed through facebook advertisements showing ai generated imagery, with no genuine photographs of the venue.[19] in october 2024, thousands of people were reported to have assembled for a non existent halloween parade in dublin as a result of a listing on an aggregation listings website, myspirithalloween.com, which used ai generated content.[20][21] the listing went viral on tiktok and instagram.[22] while a similar parade had been held in galway, and dublin had hosted parades in prior years, there was no parade in dublin in 2024.[21] one analyst characterized the website, which appeared to use ai generated staff pictures, as likely using artificial intelligence "to create content quickly and cheaply where opportunities are found".[23] the site's owner said that "we asked chatgpt to write the article for us, but it wasn't chatgpt by itself." in the past the site had removed non existent events when contacted by their venues, but in the case of the dublin parade the site owner said that "no one reported that this one wasn't going to happen". myspirithalloween.com updated their page to say that the parade had been "canceled" when they became aware of the issue.[24] in november 2024, coca cola used artificial intelligence to create three commercials as part of their annual holiday campaign. these videos were immediately met with negative reception from both casual viewers and artists,[25] with animator alex hirsch, creator of gravity falls, criticizing the company's decision to not employ human artists to create the commercial.[26] in response to the negative feedback, the company defended their decision to use generative artificial intelligence stating that "coca cola will always remain dedicated to creating the highest level of work at the intersection of human creativity and technology".[27] online booksellers and library vendors now have many titles that are written by ai and are not curated into collections by librarians. the digital media provider hoopla, which supplies libraries with ebooks and downloadable content, has generative ai books with fictional authors and dubious quality, which cost libraries money when checked out by unsuspecting patrons.[28]

but i wonder how much this is ai and how much we've sort of curated a slop pattern even before ai:   video game tips web pages with massive chunks of text / ads before you get to the inevitable answer of "hit a when x happens".   the horrendous mess that quora became with technically correct in some ways but also misleading answers to historical content.   medium articles about coding that are filled with irrelevant pics and blocks of text that are "not wrong" but also "not right" followed by weirdly specific code... we had all that before ai. the problem is that dopamine addicts generate outsized engagement. i know a literal crack mom who spends a solid 90+ hours a week watching accident videos to keep her brain triggered. the algorithm caters to her. send promotional emails daily or more, constant notifications, recommend the same few videos over and over. gotta get in there before she clicks another car crash video. imho: marketing is a top societal evil right now. if the media machine wasn't so desperate for content, ai wouldn't be a fraction of the problem it is. but with everyone obsessing over the next piece of content, fake ai presentations are mandatory. spelled "profitable". this is definitely something that's already happened/happening; see algorithmic timelines and the widespread sudden legalization and acceptance of gambling. is though i’m starting to think that ai might improve faster than us so there might only be a diminishing margin of opportunity left to do this. eventually we’ll realize we can just send the bullet points and generate the prose on the receiving side. this will be great because most of the time the ai’s will be able to say “let’s just be a nop.” i am less optimistic than the comic. the algorithm is being trained solely for engagement. it is horrifying. the slop is the wordy vapid garbage that maximizes seo. also, we have to look at the incentives: advertisement. somehow, this is acceptable to consumers, profitable for companies and profitable for publishers. how, is absolutely beyond me... and it won't change so long as google has a majority in the "search" space as they are directly profiting from this. it’s the reason advertising costs have ballooned digitally, and also the cause of many lawsuits that google continues downplaying in the public eye. what kills me is i have to hunt for the answer in quora now. i just treat quora like i do pinterest, just back out and never return. for me, it's one of those "quality of life" things that really improves my search experience (and is therefore worth paying for). what ai gives us is vastly cheaper slop, so now it can be produced at a scale unimaginable to prior generations. no more paying some schmuck a penny a word to bang out "private label articles," so they were only practical as seo. now you can have a unique slop for every spam email, every search query! truly, we are making the world a better place. wot now? somehow i managed to completely miss that. edit: ah, seems like it's mainly a twitter thing. that explains it. but, consider that all that crap ended up on the web for a reason, and wonder how long before ai just injects it itself into its own results. (and people have been giving me identical response with "advertising" in place of "marketing" for years now, so i'll say yes to both; the terms are effectively interchangeable in both motte and bailey cases.) i do find myself sometimes even prompting for a shorter answer after it hits me with a blob of text ;) it make sense to come up with terms to describe common patterns: chain of thought, rag etc. are good examples of this. but the passion some members of this community have for being intentionally confusing is tiresome.   10 seconds intro   10 seconds yoooo guys wassss up   30 seconds build up   30 seconds showing what the answer will do   30 seconds encouraging you to post comments to the video   2 seconds to explain the answer if this is really what's optimal for the sacred algorithm, then that algorithm needs a serious tune up. but that's not the scary part. the difference with ai slop is just the enormity of the scale and speed at which we can produce it. finally, a couple of data centers can produce more slop than the entirety of humanity, combined. at work people often ask me for help with documents or translation. or i see some friends' conversations. while polish grammar is pretty difficult, it's not surprising to see messages with orthographic errors in 5 out of six words. you just live in a bubble of people who can read and write well. there is absolutely everything wrong with that if it consistently invades and drowns out the voices of the well educated elite. the worst tyranny in this world is the tyranny of the ignorant against the learned. in its worst form, it can lead to mob justice and other horrible things. maybe that's not your worldview, but it is the view of many, and it's just as legitimate as yours. but they're saying something. the characteristic feature of slop is not informality: it's fundamental meaninglessness. think only about your own consumption for a second. you're not going to engage with slop, are you? i'm imagining that whatever your filter process is, that you manage to heavily engage with content that is mostly good and well suited for you. discounting google search becoming crummy, of course. ai in the hands of talented people is a tool, and they'll use it to make better stuff that appeals to you. i wouldn't worry about other people. lots of people like rage bait, yellow journalism, tabloid spam, celebrity gossip, etc. there's not much you can do about that. my master's thesis was on a topic that nobody else researched (it wasn't revolutionary, just a fun novel gimmick), so i had to write filler just to have a chapter on a topic possible to find references to, in order to get the citations count, even if the chapter wasn't relevant to the actual topic of the thesis so yes, i think that the push to create slop was there even before computers became a thing, we just didn't recognize it its not a horrendous mess for me. it works very well. everything depends on what content you interact with as the algorithm heavily shapes your content depending on what you interact with. its no different from any other social network. https://github.com/sean public/recipefilter when i was a kid we used to spend summers with my grandmother. it was an idyllica pastoral setting and we used to chase the goats around and catch butterflys. [snip 3000 words] ...when i asked her for her recipe, it turns out she made cinnamon rolls by buying pillsbury ones at the grocery store! so if you don't want to be like grandmother, use 2 cups of flour... other examples include those books where each chapter generously estimated has a tweet worth of thought padded out with 35 pages of meandering anecdotes that just paraphrase the same idea. like it's very clearly a sort of scam, the padding is there to make it seem like the book has more information that it does when you look at it in a digital bookstore. just like simple template generated seo, template written "content", etc. before. in fact, a lot of writing about ai slop could be considered just as much slop... they look for detailed pages, so pages are bloated with irrelevant information. they look for pages people spend a lot of time on, so the same thing occurs. plus, the hellscape that is modern advertising means that rushing content out quickly and cheaply is encouraged over anything else. ai will probably accelerate the process even more, but it's already been a huge issue for years now. google incentives don't matter much for honest website operators. they're only relevant when you want to abuse the system to promote your worthless bullshit[0] at the expense of the commons. i really wish society started to treat marketing hustlers with the same disdain it has for robbers.    [0]   if it was worth anything, you wouldn't be worried about seo all that much, especially back before it all turned into a race to the bottom. “the term [‘slop’] has sprung up in 4chan, hacker news and youtube comments, where anonymous posters sometimes project their proficiency in complex subject matter by using in group language.” “some have identified simon willison, a developer, as an early adopter of the term   but mr. willison, who has pushed for the phrase’s adoption, said it was in use long before he found it. ‘i think i might actually have been quite late to the party!’ he said in an email.” the first substantive discussion of the word here seems to be this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40301490 if anything, it originally started as calling things "goyslop", which you might be able to deduce is a portmanteau of "goyim" and "slop", the implication (given it's 4chan) of course being that it's low quality stuff made by jews that is foisted upon the "goyim" (non jews). to the point that i usually see people calling it "aislop"... specifically to differentiate it from "goyslop", so pervasive is the use of the term. i'm honestly surprised "slop" (in this specific context) is hitting the mainstream (apparently) given it's so closely married to anti semitic undertones. i assume it's kind of like pepe? people see the cute frog or the edgy designation of things as "slop" not knowing that's kind of a minced version of how it's actually used on 4chan. (this is in contrast to pepe, which was popularized principally on 4chan and then exported by reactionaries.) https://archive.4plebs.org/_/search/text/goyslop/order/asc/ it would be strange if the slop industry didn't try to take over the word since they exist to preempt all charges against their authority. actually "engineer" as well in countries where it's not protected. though the confused look on my german housemate's face when an "engineer" turned up to connect the cable broadband cable to the property was pretty funny. so things that are woke get called goyslop (as opposed to jewish as you imply). didn't claim it wasn't antisemitic, it is, a lot! the way 4chan lingo seeps into mainstream internet discourse is so annoying. it happened with "degenerate" too (which, of course, 4chan borrowed from the nazis' degenerate art exhibition). one such idea was how the internet was filled with garbage by all these agents (which were implied or stated were ai, i can't recall). they would subtly change things to be wrong. why? essentially to sell you a solution to this that filters out all the crap. currently we rely a lot on altruism for much of the information on the internet (eg wikipedia). ai agents will get harder and harder to differentiate from actual humans making wikipedia edits. i don't think we're that far away from human vs ai wikipedia edit wars. i really wonder how much human knowledge will be destroyed by (intentional or otherwise) ai vandalism in the future. > “crap, you once called it,” i reminded him. > “yes a technical term. so crap filtering became important. businesses were built around it. some of those businesses came up with a clever plan to make more money: they poisoned the well. they began to put crap on the reticulum deliberately, forcing people to use their products to filter that crap back out. they created syndevs whose sole purpose was to spew crap into the reticulum. but it had to be good crap.” > “what is good crap?” arsibalt asked in a politely incredulous tone. > “well, bad crap would be an unformatted document consisting of random letters. good crap would be a beautifully typeset, well written document that contained a hundred correct, verifiable sentences and one that was subtly false. it’s a lot harder to generate good crap. at first they had to hire humans to churn it out. they mostly did it by taking legitimate documents and inserting errors swapping one name for another, say. but it didn’t really take off until the military got interested.” > “as a tactic for planting misinformation in the enemy’s reticules, you mean,” osa said. “this i know about. you are referring to the artificial inanity programs of the mid first millennium a.r.” > “exactly!” sammann said. “artificial inanity systems of enormous sophistication and power were built for exactly the purpose fraa osa has mentioned. in no time at all, the praxis leaked to the commercial sector and spread to the rampant orphan botnet ecologies. never mind. the point is that there was a sort of dark age on the reticulum that lasted until my ita forerunners were able to bring matters in hand.” i always pictured the ita as wearing elaborate robes with hoods darkening their faces due to their secretive nature. but in fact he describes sammann as looking basically just like gilfoyle from silicon valley, including the way he dresses. which is amazing given the roots of the ita (he describes the word as coming from information technology and the meaning of the a is lost to time, but it's obvious to a 20th century earth born reader it comes from it administrator). there are so many delightful details in anathem, it's well worth a second reading. all the more reason to use local models and curated feeds from now on. local llms can clean / firewall the bad stuff, and follow our guidance. they will be like the new anti virus software. i've predicted early in 2023 that in the future operating systems and browsers will all sport a small llm that will ensure we don't get abused by the internet and provide a "room of our own", where we have total privacy. it's already a reality. no we can't. how many websites from 1998 survive today, in a form you can actually find (e.g. not the wayback machine)? in ten or twenty years, most pre 2022 data will be inaccessible. [1] https://www.businessinsider.com/ai spam google ruin internet... [2] https://www.ghostery.com/blog/how to prepare for ai spam [3] https://www.theregister.com/2024/04/13/google_ai_spam/ spam is trying to sell you something, e.g. an unsolicited email peddling a supplements. slop is low quality content, e.g. someone taking a bunch of bird pictures off google and posting it in a birding facebook group. spam is an ad, slop is not. with ai, it is now much easier to generate slop. computer generated fake texts are spam, doesn't matter if they're selling pills to me or my attention to ad networks. slop = technically what you asked for, but intentionally created just to fill space and increase traffic/hits, generally of the lowest quality rendering it unusable would you still consider that "spam"? maybe the algorithms will be so good, and enough creative people will use these tools to generate truly exciting content that they wouldn't have been able to otherwise but it just looks totally dire to me for creatives at this moment. the "content" industry (books, music, movies, all of it) has a systemic issue of which we are only just seeing the beginning. namely, there is now so much content, and it is all so easily accessible, that the relative value of any one piece of content has fallen way, way down. there are only so many hours in the day, and only so many days in a lifetime, and only so many humans on the planet, and growth in that aggregate content consumption capacity has been far outstripped by the growth in content production capacity. there's just obscenely more high quality new to you content than you can ever consume   and an increasing proportion of it is available very cheaply, or even free. anything new faces an uphill battle against everything old   and now, against ai too. this is going to get a lot worse before it gets better (and it may never get better). the value of generic / impersonal content is rapidly approaching zero. the only thing that still has value is a particular creator of interest posting their next video   like your favorite youtube channel, you’ll watch that. it seems like the only way to succeed in this new environment is to be a real human person who builds a following / cult of personality around themselves and their content with its signature that is unique to them. it’s something like ‘releasing content that is personally signed’ where the person’s signature has value to a certain audience. the audience is ‘captive’ because they can’t get that ‘personal signature’ anywhere else. even ai can’t deepfake it, because the perceived value of it is specifically that it is coming from a particular real human person. correction: pretend to be a real human (or even a hyperreal human), not to be a real human. this is the game youtubers and instagram influencers have been playing for over a decade   there's a team of people building a brand around the face of the vlogger/influencer, making them seem like a really nice and interesting human, where in fact the opposite is the case. the point of it is to exploit human vulnerability to parasocial relationships, creating a captive audience primed to be receptive to the deluge of advertising that follows. yes, this is one of the few ways for "content" to keep value these days. which is ironic, given that the net value of it to the consumer and society is squarely negative. are you sure about this? how are you measuring quality? for me, if something resembles advertising i consider it to be of very low quality. there are some exceptions, for example some of the movie work by roy andersson, but they are very few. as far as i can tell, ad discourse and ad style permeates pretty much everything in contemporary "content". every time i go to my library and open something older than me the language is like a fresh air, it's clear that someone put some intellectual work into it and there is a distinct character to the text, personality imbued by the typographers, authors and editors. this is very rare on the internet, and whenever i come across it the typography is usually ad adjacent anyway. i hope this is the start of walled garden human internet. web rings, moderated forums, ect. a common cyberpunk trope is a trashed net and a private net. people who pay for content demonstrate that they have disposable income and are willing to spend it, which makes them prime population for advertisers to target. by paying, they're distinguishing themselves for the net near worthless population of free users. there's a huge pressure for advertisers to tap into that juicy population of paying users; it takes only so long before any given service succumbs to that pressure. the problem is with the spam and slop. any sucessful walled garden will need to keep this crap out. banning adds is just one way. content review is another. there are some, but it's a rounding error compared to the ad funded slop. basing your business model around advertising creates strong perverse incentives, pitting you against your users/customers. sometimes, a company gets enough return on advertising investment they can fund side ventures off their marketing budget   this creates an ubi like low pressure space for quality content to grow. but stuff funded directly from ads? it's safe to assume the content there is secondary at best, and exists primarily as a vector to bait you so you can be exposed to ads. > banning adds is just one way. content review is another. right, but they're complementary. content review gets easier when you cut out 99% of crap at the source by fiat, and with a hard line drawn, the reviewers are much harder for marketers to compromise either. agreed. walled gardens cut out the crap. invitation only. then they will complain that the internet is full of trash content that doesn't suite them. this will happen regardless if you paid for content or not. the natural world is filled with parasites, it is an effective evolutionary strategy. they are willing to view ads (proving they value the material) but as a rule are unwilling to pay any cash. even content that is worth paying for, like research, will quickly reach an equilibrium that maximizes profit while minimizing effort. that's completely the wrong framing for this idea. the problem is that you don't know if it's valuable until you've bought it, unless the seller gives it for free and just trusts you to pay later in the event you did. if i see a new to me fruit in the supermarket, i can buy one to see if i like it, and i can be reasonably confident that my first taste will be a reliable indicator of if i should buy more. not that there is no sub groups that will happily pay. for all their problems, i trust numerous media brands to not give me slop: the new york times, the financial times, monocle, matt levine, linus tech tips, the verge, hundreds of youtubers and twitter users, even hacker news. let media companies and creators who want to set fire to their good names get on with it, because it'll hopefully mean anyone doing a good, consistent job will rise. caught red handed faking test results, the official response "if we actually did the tests we wouldn't be able to publish videos fast enough" i still trust ltt more than a channel pumping out faceless review videos or one so unknown that there aren't enough viewers to even provide any scrutiny. to butcher the eponymous linus's law: given enough eyeballs, all mistakes are shallow? the other part is that practically speaking, there's enough good free content in most fields that paying doesn't get you anything better. it's not surfaced well enough by the algorithms, but it does exist, and it makes it so in most areas, there's very little reason to pay for anything. might not be the main reason, just that these unsatisfied users are so vocal, idk. you literally can't evaluate content before you consume it in it's entirety or the at least the amount you wish. given that copyright should be abolished, adverts should be banned and content industry should move to entirely post paid voluntary financing. something like gaming piracy where you play the whole game for free and if you really liked it you "buy" "a copy" to support developers and their investors. 1. people could forcibly seize and redistribute content already made in years 1980 2020. even that would be better than slop. 2. people could read only those   like scientists or open source and public domain authors   either funded by the state or otherwise willing to publish their works for free at high quality without the monetization slop text. the content exists, but monetized slop hides it. 3. actually good ai can compress multiple slop articles into useful, non sloppy content. i'd be perfectly fine if the internet consists of just math textbooks and science papers, and actually good articles automatically distilled from slop. it has the potential to give us what we need. the problem is that slop hides all that! the problem with public domain stuff is that there is more than enough of it, but you cannot access public domain information because monetized slop has superseded it in the search results. i believe that automated ai engines will eventually help individuals find non sloppy public domain articles, or assemble them from slop directly. but piracy is always a good option.   slop will continue to become cheaper to generate, and people will only notice the obvious stuff   hyperpersonalized content will abound, yet authenticity will run dry   the lack of authenticity in electronic channels will drive a small segment of people offline into less fakeable (for now) social contexts   humans online will walk a treadmill of increasingly convoluted shibboleths / gnirut tests (reverse turing tests ;)) to self identify as likely not ai generated, i.e., subtly run on sentences that are intelligible but slightly non conformist to prevailing ai model outputs, and usage of old school emoticons and other quirks   humans will walk on similar "gnirut treadmills" for visual art, speech, video, and music   ai models will gladly chase humans along these gnirut treadmills, filling in canyons and sections of the uncanny valley with fractally sophisticated humanlike content though i try, i fail to think of a comparable scenario in our past, at least as relates to language. you can look around whatever room you are in and try to identify an object that was made by human hands rather than a factory process. that's a fact that always makes me a bit sad. i think we're headed in a similar direction with the language we consume. craftsmanship falls by the wayside, and our world loses even more of the human touch that connects us with one another. i think this segment might start small but i think it will grow rapidly if the utility of the internet is dwarfed with low quality crap. the belief that non technical people won't catch on to the shenanigans and simply look elsewhere is a bad bet some are making and i think everyone living on the internet during covid gave non technical people an intuitive feeling for all the manipulation and tenuous quality of the internet as a tool/public utility they can trust in any form. the kicker is that if you ask gpt 4 about it, it spits out the same incorrect information, meaning that gpt 4 was likely trained on this bad data. fwiw, gpt 4o gives a much more accurate response. and beyond slop, there will be ai models that do product placement. openai's "publisher partnerships" deck explains https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40310228 so soon you'll go to a news website and get the political filter bubble that reinforces   or outrages   your prejudices to maximize your engagement. and in the middle of it, the ai will slip in that the brand of grill that caused the fire was rumoured to be ${insert_name_of_competitor_here} etc? the big future for ai is to move slop beyond outrage and into intimacy territory. if rage was the engagement of the last ten years, then ending up only talking to ais who pretend to care will be the even more addictive engagement of the next ten :( then it'll build up habits and routines with you. you'll feel good that your ai slop is actually good ai and is trying to benefit you. all the while, the verified reports and data always supports your expectations and worldview. it's almost perfect, aside from the fact it sometimes cites the federalist more than it should. and it convinced you to throw out all your pillows and buy a whole new set for your family. but you're able to look past it, because it's actually good ai. it's better than what automated scripts could produce and cheaper than human generated copy. it has expertise of the whole internet and its reasoning capabilities are often worse than those of a three year old. similar for sure, and yet something different. they sent us new copy for our core marketing pages last week, and many sections simply sound non sensical. as in it just didn't make cohesive sense, and it was clear a human being didn't write (or even review) the content. this is the problem with new ai "slop". in the past, blogspam / seo spam was at least reviewed and written by a human. now, we have content getting published straight out of the mouth of text generators. the quality of long form content from text generators is significantly worse than even mediocre $10/hr copywriters in many cases. on the other hand, there's indeed a lot of popular human made fake content lately, especially in tiktok, like fake guitar playing and fake nonsensical diy videos. so it's not an ai exclusive phenomena. people should call it for what it is. tried to find some answers on google earlier in the day, and the first result pages were 100% generated slop. funnily enough, any ai summary of the slop would be slop squared. it's everywhere, and i hate it. what ways do people have to combat it out of their day? https://web.archive.org/web/20240611214752if_/https://www.ny... i’m not necessarily seeing the slop problem. people should always have been skeptical of content on untrusted websites. now, if reputable sources start trying to pump out content with ai, that’d be a problem. i suspect for those who try, they’ll quickly lose their reputation. yes, but people's output is limited by their ability to type words on a keyboard. llms and other generative a.i. aren't bound by this limitation, and can put out significantly more. > people should always have been skeptical of content on untrusted websites. now, if reputable sources start trying to pump out content with ai, that’d be a problem. how do you define untrusted websites, or reputable source? especially when google   which should be a trusted, reputable source   starts pumping out garbage as they did? on the second point   this is precisely what i’m talking about when i say if reputable sources start churning out junk, they will lose their reputation. this is a negative publicity event for google. if it keeps happening, people will no longer trust the information coming from google. but there is a difference whether the ratio of good to bad articles is 1:10 or 1:10,000 one is tedious but managable, the other is hopeless. with generative a.i., this kind of slop can be pumped out at an industrial scale. it'd be like equating your neighbor dumping a bag of garbage on the roadside, with the industrial plant down the road pouring out thousands of gallons of toxic waste per minute into a river. that's for the very lowest tier video. the usual formula, is that for every minute of runtime, you have at least 30 minutes of editing. with professionally produced video, i think it's triple or quadruple that. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyongskwiaw now used to describe anything that looks half assed, poorly put together, etc. i think of the buckets of scraps you would feed a pig. the stuff the humans don't want to eat and would just as well put in the garbage bin. [1]: https://mailmanhq.com/ irrelevant, but also fantastic. at this velocity it’ll make some categories pure noise by end of year there will be a backlash against robotic phone assistants in support centers. support businesses that dont put out slop or ai garbage. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/s000768132...

👋🏽, this month, we’re diving into social media offence and defence, offering our ai for sport course, and sharing a pride month recap. oh and celebrating the growth of professional women’s sports in canada. if you haven’t done so already, sign up for an areto free trial today, and give yourself (or your team) a summer break from bots, trolls and constant vigilance. don't just attack with content! master the art of social media defence to cultivate a thriving online community and fuel engagement. in the game of social media, a strong offence is essential. in celebration of pride month, we're sharing some of our key research on pride and hockey. our findings highlight two important insights: the prevalence of abuse around pride games is driven by a loud minority, and removing this abuse significantly boosts engagement and brand health. join us in exploring how these lessons can inspire positive change across all sports. (new jersey) devils advocatenhl pride nights white paper from ready: in this online, on demand course, you'll learn the origins, types, and applications of artificial intelligence. it also analyzes some of the controversies and risks so you know what to look out for if you decide to delve further. you'll then get introduced to diverse examples of how ai is currently being applied in sports, with a focus on ai's potential for women's sports. upon completion (2.5 hours of learning), you'll be ready to understand, navigate, and maybe even use ai in your personal and professional life. featuring expert insights from: nancy hensley, founding member, mercury13 and former executive at ibm and statsperform jacqueline comer, founder and chief product officer, areto labs kahlia hogg, computer science and ai, duke university sadaf tayebi, chelsea fc and emerging tech young leader there are only 50 free spots available, so get in fast! how to enrol for free: go to the course sales page here click "enroll now", which takes you to the order summary page. where it says "add coupon code" type in the code areto. leaked documents provide a glimpse into the inner workings of google search and contradict the company’s public claims. read more in is google seo gaslighting the internet? learn about the new ai term that has emerged to describe dubious ai generated material read now announcements we’re super excited about:women’s pro sport in canada goes from strength to strength: wbna announces team in toronto! northern super league (nsl) professional soccer league (women) officially launches in canada with 6 teams from coast to coast super elections year:journalists face unprecedented risks like threats, intimidation, misinformation and disinformation. the coalition against online violence (caov) is launching the #electsafely campaign to empower journalists against online abuse this election season. this campaign offers resources and tools to protect journalists and media professionals. visit electsafely for campaign initiatives and resources. follow the #electsafely hashtag and @thecaov, @penamerica, @iwmf, & @righttobeorg about ethical moderation we’re on a mission to make the internet a safer and happier place for all. that's why our software ensures no one gets hurt during the moderation process. we don't just zap hateful content, we also make sure that everyone's mental health is in tip top shape, and do away with the need for outsourced moderators. copyright (c) 2023 * areto labs inc*. all rights reserved. for information about our privacy policy, go here areto labs, 4136 ramsay road nw, edmonton, canada, t6h5r2 powered by squarespace
supported by a new term has emerged to describe dubious a.i. generated material. by benjamin hoffman you may not know exactly what “slop” means in relation to artificial intelligence. but on some level you probably do. slop, at least in the fast moving world of online message boards, is a broad term that has developed some traction in reference to shoddy or unwanted a.i. content in social media, art, books and, increasingly, in search results. google suggesting that you could add nontoxic glue to make cheese stick to a pizza? that’s slop. so is a low price digital book that seems like the one you were looking for, but not quite. and those posts in your facebook feed that seemingly came from nowhere? they’re slop as well. the term became more prevalent last month when google incorporated its gemini a.i. model into its u.s. based search results. rather than pointing users toward links, the service attempts to solve a query directly with an “a.i. overview”   a chunk of text at the top of a results page that uses gemini to form its best guess at what the user is looking for. the change was a reaction to microsoft having incorporated a.i. into its search results on bing, and it had some immediate missteps, leading google to declare it would roll back some of its a.i. features until problems can be ironed out. but with the dominant search engines having made a.i. a priority, it appears that vast quantities of information generated by machines, rather than largely curated by humans, will be served up as a daily part of life on the internet for the foreseeable future.

 friday, 21 jun 2024 a lot of ai generated content is unreliable.    afp relaxnews among the huge mass of content now produced by artificial intelligence, much is unreliable and of poor quality. this phenomenon now has a name   slop   in a bid to make internet users more aware of this ever growing phenomenon. a recent article in the new york times highlights the use of the term "slop" to describe the dubious content generated by ai. the term "slop" may conjure up images of unpalatable food poured into cattle troughs, but it now also refers to mediocre content produced by artificial intelligence. this can include inappropriate advice, bogus articles, dubious social media posts or poor quality ebooks. the term first appeared on american forums, but gained in popularity when google made public its gemini generative artificial intelligence chatbot, which produced some astonishing results.