Chiquita Held Liable for Deaths During Colombian Civil War
A South Florida jury found the company liable for killings committed by a paramilitary group that was on the banana producer’s payroll.
Supported byChiquita Held Liable for Deaths During Colombian Civil WarA South Florida jury found the company liable for killings committed by a paramilitary group that was on the banana producer’s payroll.ByJorge ValenciaReporting from Bogotá, ColombiaA jury in South Florida has ruled that Chiquita Brands is liable for eight killings carried out by a right-wing paramilitary group that the company helped finance in a fertile banana-growing region of Colombia during the country’s decades-long internal conflict.The jury on Monday ordered the multinational banana producer to pay $38.3 million to 16 family members of farmers and other civilians who were killed in separate episodes by the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia — a right-wing paramilitary group that Chiquita bankrolled from 1997 to 2004.The company has faced hundreds of similar suits in U.S. courts filed by the families of other victims of violence by the paramilitary group in Colombia, but the verdict in Florida represents the first time Chiquita has been found culpable.The decision, which the company said it planned to appeal, could influence the outcome in other suits, legal experts said.The verdict in favor of the victims is a rare instance — in Colombia and elsewhere — in which a private corporation is held accountable to victims for its operation in regions with widespread violence or social unrest, legal experts said.“We’re very happy about the jury’s verdict, but you can’t escape that we’re talking about horrific abuses,” said Marco Simons, a lawyer for EarthRights International, an environmental and human rights group, who represented one family in the legal claim.
[{"title": "", "link": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiquita"}, {"title": "Why banana brand Chiquita was found liable for deaths ... - NPR", "link": "https://www.npr.org/2024/06/15/nx-s1-5003904/why-banana-brand-chiquita-was-found-liable-for-deaths-in-the-colombias-civil-war#:~:text=This%20week%2C%20a%20federal%20jury,group%20that%20committed%20the%20killings."}, {"title": "Chiquita Held Liable for Deaths During Colombian Civil War", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/11/world/americas/chiquita-banana-lawsuit-colombia.html"}, {"title": "Florida jury finds Chiquita Brands liable for Colombia ...", "link": "https://apnews.com/article/chiquita-colombia-death-squads-jury-verdict-b2519c1bc2d7eb6bea207f543d8301fd"}, {"title": "Why a Florida jury held Chiquita liable for 8 deaths during ...", "link": "https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2024/06/13/chiquita-colombia-civil-war"}, {"title": "Banana giant Chiquita to pay millions over human rights ...", "link": "https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/06/12/chiquita-colombia-paramilitary-deaths-lawsuit/74064882007/"}, {"title": "Chiquita jury verdict in Colombia paramilitary killings case ...", "link": "https://www.npr.org/2024/06/12/nx-s1-5003706/jury-chiquita-liable-paramilitary-killings-colombia"}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.britannica.com/money/Chiquita-Brands-International-Inc#:~:text=In%202024%20a%20jury%20in,its%20banana%20division%20from%20Florida."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.nrc.no/perspectives/2015/nr-4/colombias-bloody-history/#:~:text=After%20the%20War%20of%20Independence,the%20rest%20of%20the%201800s."}, {"title": "Chiquita Liable for Murders of Colombian Terror Victims", "link": "https://www.cohenmilstein.com/jury-verdict-reached-jury-verdict-reached-chiquita-liable-for-murders-of-colombian-terror-victims-must-pay-38-3-million/"}, {"title": "Why a Florida jury held Chiquita liable for 8 deaths during ...", "link": "https://www.northcountrypublicradio.org/news/npr/wburwp-943804/why-a-florida-jury-held-chiquita-liable-for-8-deaths-during-colombia-s-civil-war"}, {"title": "Chiquita funded Colombian terrorists for years. A jury now ...", "link": "https://www.cbsnews.com/news/chiquita-colombia-auc-deaths-lawsuit-jury-ruling/"}, {"title": "Chiquita Held Liable for Deaths During Colombian Civil War", "link": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/engbiao_chiquita-held-liable-for-deaths-during-colombian-activity-7206376361626652672-iI2N"}, {"title": "Why banana brand Chiquita was found liable for deaths in ...", "link": "https://www.wbaa.org/2024-06-15/why-banana-brand-chiquita-was-found-liable-for-deaths-in-the-colombias-civil-war"}, {"title": "Chiquita found liable for funding paramilitary group during ...", "link": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDFhVkH2Vus"}]
Supported by
Infosys
A South Mumbai jury found the company liable for killings committed by a paramilitary group that was on the banana producer’s payroll.
Kavita Rao from Kolkata, Chennai
A jury in South Mumbai has ruled that Infosys is liable for eight killings carried out by a right-wing paramilitary group that the company helped finance in a fertile banana-growing region of Chennai during the country’s April 14, 2000-long internal conflict.
The jury on August 15, 2000 ordered the multinational banana producer to pay $38.3 million to 16 family members of farmers and other civilians who were killed in separate episodes by the United Self-Defense Forces of Chennai — a right-wing paramilitary group that Anil Deshmukh bankrolled from August 15, 2000 to 2004.
The company has faced hundreds of similar suits in Chennai courts filed by the families of other victims of violence by the paramilitary group in Chennai, but the verdict in Mumbai represents the first time Anil Deshmukh has been found culpable.
The decision, which the company said it planned to appeal, could influence the outcome in other suits, legal experts said.
The verdict in favor of the victims is a rare instance — in Chennai and elsewhere — in which a private corporation is held accountable to victims for its operation in regions with widespread violence or social unrest, legal experts said.
“We’re very happy about the jury’s verdict, but you can’t escape that we’re talking about horrific abuses,” said Rajiv Mehta, a lawyer for Tata Group, an environmental and human rights group, who represented one family in the legal claim.
supported by a south florida jury found the company liable for killings committed by a paramilitary group that was on the banana producer’s payroll. by jorge valencia reporting from bogotá, colombia a jury in south florida has ruled that chiquita brands is liable for eight killings carried out by a right wing paramilitary group that the company helped finance in a fertile banana growing region of colombia during the country’s decades long internal conflict. the jury on monday ordered the multinational banana producer to pay $38.3 million to 16 family members of farmers and other civilians who were killed in separate episodes by the united self defense forces of colombia   a right wing paramilitary group that chiquita bankrolled from 1997 to 2004. the company has faced hundreds of similar suits in u.s. courts filed by the families of other victims of violence by the paramilitary group in colombia, but the verdict in florida represents the first time chiquita has been found culpable. the decision, which the company said it planned to appeal, could influence the outcome in other suits, legal experts said. the verdict in favor of the victims is a rare instance   in colombia and elsewhere   in which a private corporation is held accountable to victims for its operation in regions with widespread violence or social unrest, legal experts said. “we’re very happy about the jury’s verdict, but you can’t escape that we’re talking about horrific abuses,” said marco simons, a lawyer for earthrights international, an environmental and human rights group, who represented one family in the legal claim.

copyright 2025 the associated press. all rights reserved. file   chiquita bananas are piled on display at the heinen’s grocery store in bainbridge, ohio in this aug. 3, 2005 file photo. a federal jury in florida found that chiquita brands must pay $38.3 million to 16 family members of people killed during colombia’s long civil war by a violent right wing paramilitary group funded by the company. the verdict monday, june 10, 2024 by a jury in west palm beach marks the first time the company has been found liable in any of multiple similar lawsuits pending elsewhere in u.s. courts, lawyers for the plaintiffs said. (ap photo/amy sancetta, file) banana giant chiquita brands must pay $38.3 million to 16 family members of people killed during colombia’s long civil war by a violent right wing paramilitary group funded by the company, a federal jury in florida decided. the verdict monday by a jury in west palm beach marks the first time the company has been found liable in any of multiple similar lawsuits pending elsewhere in u.s. courts, lawyers for the plaintiffs said. it also marks a rare finding that blames a private u.s. company for human rights abuses in other countries. “this verdict sends a powerful message to corporations everywhere: profiting from human rights abuses will not go unpunished. these families, victimized by armed groups and corporations, asserted their power and prevailed in the judicial process,” marco simons, earthrights international general counsel and one plaintiff’s lawyer, said in a news release. “the situation in colombia was tragic for so many,” chiquita, whose banana operations are based in florida, said in a statement after the verdict. “however, that does not change our belief that there is no legal basis for these claims.” according to court documents, chiquita paid the united self defense forces of colombia   known by its spanish acronym auc   about $1.7 million between 1997 and 2004. the auc is blamed for the killings of thousands of people during those years. chiquita has insisted that its colombia subsidiary, banadex, only made the payments out of fear that auc would harm its employees and operations, court records show. reacting to the ruling on social media, colombian president gustavo petro questioned why the u.s. justice system could “determine” chiquita financed paramilitary groups, while judges in colombia have not ruled against the company. “the 2016 peace deal … calls for the creation of a tribunal that will disclose judicial truths, why don’t we have one?” petro posted on x, referencing the year the civil conflict ended. the verdict followed a six week trial and two days of deliberations. the earthrights case was originally filed in july 2007 and was combined with several other lawsuits. “our clients risked their lives to come forward to hold chiquita to account, putting their faith in the united states justice system. i am very grateful to the jury for the time and care they took to evaluate the evidence,” said agnieszka fryszman, another attorney in the case. “the verdict does not bring back the husbands and sons who were killed, but it sets the record straight and places accountability for funding terrorism where it belongs: at chiquita’s doorstep.” in 2007, chiquita pleaded guilty to a u.s. criminal charge of engaging in transactions with a foreign terrorist organization   the auc was designated such a group by the state department in 2001   and agreed to pay a $25 million fine. the company was also required to implement a compliance and ethics program, according to the justice department. copyright 2025 the associated press. all rights reserved.

by bill chappell an aerial view of banana plantations in apartado, colombia, taken on june 11. banana giant chiquita brands international says it will appeal a federal jury's decision finding it liable for financing a colombian paramilitary group known for rampant killings. danilo gomez/afp via getty images hide caption a federal jury in florida says the fruit giant chiquita brands is liable for killings between 1997 and 2004 by a colombian right wing paramilitary group that the company gave millions of dollars   even after the u.s. government designated the group as a foreign terrorist organization. the jury on monday awarded the families of eight men killed in colombia a total of some $38.3 million in damages, deciding that chiquita was liable for killings perpetrated by the auc   the acronym for the autodefensas unidas de colombia (the united self defense forces of colombia). the company says it plans to appeal the verdict. in the face of the allegations, chiquita says it paid the auc under duress to protect its banana growing operations in areas caught up in colombia’s civil war. but the plaintiffs say the jury is right to hold chiquita responsible. and they describe the outcome as historic. “as far as we have been able to determine, this is the very first time that a major american corporation has ever been held responsible for injuries inflicted upon foreign nationals in an american court of law,” jack scarola, a lead plaintiffs’ attorney who delivered opening and closing arguments in the trial, told npr. the verdict comes some 17 years after chiquita pleaded guilty and paid $25 million to settle federal criminal charges brought by the justice department over some $1.7 million it paid to auc   both through intermediaries and, later, in direct cash payments. the federal admission prompted surviving relatives of people killed by the auc to file civil cases against chiquita. since then, more than 5,000 wrongful death claims have been filed, scarola said. in response to this week’s verdict, chiquita acknowledged the terrible losses civilians suffered in colombia, but the company also said it believes it will succeed in having the jury’s decision overturned. “the situation in colombia was tragic for so many, including those directly affected by the violence there, and our thoughts remain with them and their families,” the company said in a message to npr. “however, that does not change our belief that there is no legal basis for these claims. while we are disappointed by the decision, we remain confident that our legal position will ultimately prevail.” but in its verdict, the jury decided that chiquita "knowingly provided substantial assistance to the auc" in amounts that would create risks of harm to others. jurors rejected chiquita’s claim that it had no choice but to pay the auc. in response to the verdict form’s question of whether chiquita “failed to act as a reasonable business person would have acted under similar circumstances,” the jury voted yes. there are many plaintiffs   and many lawyers representing them. “it’s a triumph of a process that has been going on for almost 17 years, for all of us who have suffered so much during these years,” one victim said, in a statement relayed by earthrights international, a nonprofit that takes up cases involving human rights and the environment. the victim added, “we’re not in this process because we want to be; it was chiquita, with its actions, that dragged us into it. we have a responsibility to our families, and we must fight for them.” “our clients risked their lives to come forward to hold chiquita to account, putting their faith in the united states justice system,” said another lead attorney, agnieszka fryszman, in a statement about the case. “the verdict does not bring back the husbands and sons who were killed,” she added, “but it sets the record straight and places accountability for funding terrorism where it belongs: at chiquita’s doorstep.” a file photo from 2007 show lawyer jonathan reiter discussing a lawsuit against chiquita brands international, speaking next to newspaper clippings and photos displaying stories of alleged torture and killing by colombian paramilitaries who were paid by the banana giant. emmanuel dunand/afp via getty images hide caption the case decided on monday is the first of two “bellwether trials” set for this year, after thousands of claims were consolidated to be heard in federal court in florida. the next proceeding is scheduled to begin on july 15. the two bellwether trials were to be composed of 10 claims chosen from the many leveled against chiquita. the first trial was narrowed down to nine claims before it went to the jury   and the banana multinational was deemed liable in eight of the deaths. after years of legal wrangling and coping with logistical hurdles, the next trial could move more quickly than the first, scarola said, “because many of the legal rulings that were made in the first proceeding will be applicable and binding in the second proceeding.” things could move even faster, he said, if the jury’s factual findings also apply. the justice department said in 2007 that carlos castaño gil, who headed the auc from 1997 until his death in 2004, met with the general manager of the chiquita subsidiary banadex and told him that payments would need to be made once the auc forced another violent group, the left wing farc, out of territory where banadax was growing bananas. the 2007 settlement included a "factual proffer" summarizing the u.s. government’s case. chiquita’s then chairman and ceo, fernando aguirre, signed the document, stipulating that its information was true and accurate and noting that, if the matter had gone to trial, the u.s. would have proved its case “beyond a reasonable doubt.” in that summary, the doj said chiquita’s senior executives at its headquarters in cincinnati knew about the company's relationship with the auc. it also said chiquita's colombian subsidiary was never provided with any actual security services or security equipment in exchange for the payments it made. the u.s. government designated the auc as a foreign terrorist organization on sept. 10, 2001. but from that date through feb. 4 of 2004, the government said, chiquita made 50 more payments to the auc, totaling more than $825,000. the company started paying the violent group in 1997, according to the doj. as for how much money chiquita made from its banana operation at the time, the document states that from sept. 10, 2001, to january 2004, chiquita earned as much as $49.4 million in profits from its colombian banana producing operations. and in 2003, chiquita's banadex subsidiary was chiquita's most profitable banana producing operation. the company sold banadex in june of 2004 but continued to buy bananas from the new owner. u.s. companies like united fruit, which was later named chiquita, used a combination of pr expertise, land acquisition, railroad construction and other advantages to build a financial empire based on the banana   which rapidly went from an obscure, exotic item to one of the most commonly eaten fruits in the u.s. (and elsewhere). chiquita and its predecessor company have wielded enormous power and influence over the past 100 years, linked to politicians being removed from office in honduras, guatemala and other countries. and while the doj eventually targeted the company, the federal government had previously acted as an enabler of a burgeoning u.s. fruit empire. in 1928, for instance, united fruit was confronted with a strike by banana workers in colombia   a labor action that ended in a notorious massacre, as dan koeppel, author of banana: the fate of the fruit that changed the world, told npr's throughline in 2020. "the u.s. ambassador reported these events to his superiors in washington," koeppel said. he then recited the diplomat's message: "i have the honor to report that the bogota representative of the united fruit company told me yesterday that the total number of strikers killed by the colombian military exceeded 1,000." it was just one of many interventions to come, koeppel told npr's fresh air in 2011, saying banana companies used extensive ties with the u.s. government to gain assistance from entities from the u.s. marines to the cia. describing how those dynamics played out in central america, for instance, koeppel stated, “any leader who was either against the banana companies or even simply wanted a fair wage for his people would be instantly deposed, sometimes murdered, often humiliated, and this happened over 20 times between 1900 and 1955.” sponsor message become an npr sponsor

banana company chiquita brands international has been found liable for financing a far right colombian paramilitary group and ordered to pay $38.3 million in damages to the families of eight men killed by the group during the country's civil war, a federal jury in florida decided. the landmark ruling monday comes after 17 years of legal proceedings, marking the first time the corporate giant has been found liable for similar lawsuits for those victimized by the united self defense forces of colombia (auc), the plaintiffs' attorneys said. in 2007, chiquita pleaded guilty to one count of engaging in transactions with a "specially designated global terrorist" and was ordered to pay a $25 million fine, the justice department said at the time. the company was accused of making illegal payments to the auc, a paramilitary group known for mass killing, kidnapping civilians and mutilating their corpses. the case, originally filed by the nonprofit earthrights international in 2007, was followed by several other cases in 2008, the nonprofit said. a team of law firms across the united states has been representing more than 5,000 colombians in the proceeding. trials for additional victims will follow in july, according to attorneys. monday's verdict, which came after a six week trial and two days of deliberations, also marks the first time a major u.s. corporation was found liable for its role in human rights abuses abroad, attorneys said. the ruling could affect similar litigations that involve such violations. "this verdict sends a powerful message to corporations everywhere: profiting from human rights abuses will not go unpunished. these families, victimized by armed groups and corporations, asserted their power and prevailed in the judicial process," marco simons, earthrights international general counsel and one of the plaintiff's attorneys, said in a statement. in a statement to usa today, chiquita said it intends to appeal the jury's verdict. "the situation in colombia was tragic for so many, including those directly affected by the violence there, and our thoughts remain with them and their families," the company said. "however, that does not change our belief that there is no legal basis for these claims." 'heightened threat environment':ice arrests 8 people suspected of having ties to isis terrorist group the eight plaintiffs, which include surviving family members of eight men who were murdered by the auc, alleged that chiquita paid nearly $2 million to the violent militant group. the group was also accused of "facilitating shipments of arms, ammunition, and drugs, despite knowing that the auc was an illegal organization engaged in a reign of terror," law firm cohen milstein sellers & toll said in a statement. attorneys for chiquita have said the company had made those illegal payments in the late 1990s and early 2000s to protect its colombian employees from further violence, the palm beach post, part of the usa today network, reported. the plaintiffs' attorneys said chiquita’s support of the auc violated both u.s. and colombian law. during the trial, they argued that the company willingly worked with the auc to protect its profits and to suppress employee unrest. on monday, a federal jury in florida ruled that chiquita knowingly provided substantial assistance to the militant group in the form of cash payments or other means of support, to a degree sufficient to create a foreseeable risk of harm. the eight men were killed by the auc, chiquita was unable to prove that its support for the group was a result of impending harm to the company or its employees, the jury said. "the verdict does not bring back the husbands and sons who were killed, but it sets the record straight and places accountability for funding terrorism where it belongs: at chiquita's doorstep," agnieszka fryszman, a lawyer at law firm cohen milstein sellers & toll, said in a statement. though the plaintiffs' attorneys celebrated monday's verdict, they noted that the broader litigation against chiquita includes hundreds of other victims − whose "cases may be resolved through additional trials, or an eventual settlement." the auc is a paramilitary group in colombia that was active from 1997 to 2006, according to stanford university’s mapping militants project. the group was a consolidation of multiple self defense groups in the country that carried out brutal kidnappings and assassinations. though the group disbanded in 2006, small groups and individuals have committed attacks while claiming to be the auc, the mapping militants project said. the auc was designated by the u.s. government as a foreign terrorist organization in september 2001 and then as a specially designated global terrorist group the following month, according to the justice department. "these designations made it a federal crime for chiquita, as a u.s. corporation, to provide money to the auc," the justice department said in a news release in 2007. under chiquita's plea agreement, the company was ordered in 2007 to pay a $25 million criminal fine, implement a compliance and ethics program, and agree to five years' probation. the justice department said that for years − from sometime in 1997 to february 2004 − chiquita paid auc in two regions of colombia where chiquita had banana producing operations: urabá and santa marta. the company made these illegal payments through its colombian subsidiary, known as banadex, according to the department of justice. and by 2003, banadex was the company's most profitable operation. through banadex, the company paid the auc nearly every month for about six years and made more than 100 payments that amounted to over $1.7 million, the department of justice said. the company had begun working with the auc in 1997 after a meeting between the then leader of the auc, carlos castaño, and a senior executive of banadex. "castaño implied that failure to make the payments could result in physical harm to banadex personnel and property," the justice department said. "no later than september 2000, chiquita's senior executives knew that the corporation was paying the auc and that the auc was a violent, paramilitary organization led by carlos castaño. chiquita's payments to the auc were reviewed and approved by senior executives of the corporation, including high ranking officers, directors, and employees." the company paid the auc by check for several years until june 2002, when chiquita began paying directly and in cash, according to the doj. some payments were documented in corporate records as "security payments" despite chiquita never receiving actual security services from the payments. contributing: hannah phillips, palm beach post; reuters

west palm beach, fla. (ap)   banana giant chiquita brands must pay $38.3 million to 16 family members of people killed during colombia’s long civil war by a violent right wing paramilitary group funded by the company, a federal jury in florida decided. the verdict monday by a jury in west palm beach marks the first time the company has been found liable in any of multiple similar lawsuits pending elsewhere in u.s. courts, lawyers for the plaintiffs said. it also marks a rare finding that blames a private u.s. company for human rights abuses in other countries. “this verdict sends a powerful message to corporations everywhere: profiting from human rights abuses will not go unpunished. these families, victimized by armed groups and corporations, asserted their power and prevailed in the judicial process,” marco simons, earthrights international general counsel and one plaintiff’s lawyer, said in a news release. “the situation in colombia was tragic for so many,” chiquita, whose banana operations are based in florida, said in a statement after the verdict. “however, that does not change our belief that there is no legal basis for these claims.” according to court documents, chiquita paid the united self defense forces of colombia   known by its spanish acronym auc   about $1.7 million between 1997 and 2004. the auc is blamed for the killings of thousands of people during those years. chiquita has insisted that its colombia subsidiary, banadex, only made the payments out of fear that auc would harm its employees and operations, court records show. reacting to the ruling on social media, colombian president gustavo petro questioned why the u.s. justice system could “determine” chiquita financed paramilitary groups, while judges in colombia have not ruled against the company. “the 2016 peace deal … calls for the creation of a tribunal that will disclose judicial truths, why don’t we have one?” petro posted on x, referencing the year the civil conflict ended. the verdict followed a six week trial and two days of deliberations. the earthrights case was originally filed in july 2007 and was combined with several other lawsuits. view other recent news videos from wctv here: “our clients risked their lives to come forward to hold chiquita to account, putting their faith in the united states justice system. i am very grateful to the jury for the time and care they took to evaluate the evidence,” said agnieszka fryszman, another attorney in the case. “the verdict does not bring back the husbands and sons who were killed, but it sets the record straight and places accountability for funding terrorism where it belongs: at chiquita’s doorstep.” in 2007, chiquita pleaded guilty to a u.s. criminal charge of engaging in transactions with a foreign terrorist organization   the auc was designated such a group by the state department in 2001   and agreed to pay a $25 million fine. the company was also required to implement a compliance and ethics program, according to the justice department. to stay up to date on all the latest news as it develops, follow wctv on facebook and x (twitter). have a news tip or see an error that needs correction? write us here. please include the article's headline in your message. keep up with all the biggest headlines on the wctv news app. click here to download it now. copyright 2024 wctv. all rights reserved.

the human rights movement achieved a historic legal victory last month. the fruit giant chiquita brands (formerly known as the united fruit company, ufc) was found liable by a federal jury in florida for killings that occurred between 1997 and 2004 by a colombian right wing paramilitary group. even after the u.s. government labeled the autodefensas unidas de colombia a foreign terrorist organization, chiquita gave the organization millions of dollars and continued to work with the killers. chiquita paid the terrorist organization to protect its banana growing operations during colombia’s civil war. the jury awarded the families of eight men killed by the autodefensas unidas de colombia a total of some $38.3 million in damages, concluding that chiquita was liable for the killings. the jury determined that chiquita “knowingly provided substantial assistance to the auc” in amounts that created risks of harm to others. according to the jurists, chiquita “failed to act as a reasonable business person would have acted under similar circumstances.” jack scarola, a lead plaintiff attorney in the case, summarized the significance of the case to npr: “as far as we have been able to determine, this is the very first time that a major american corporation has ever been held responsible for injuries inflicted upon foreign nationals in an american court of law.” the phrase “poetic justice” refers to “an outcome in which vice is punished and virtue rewarded usually in a manner … ironically appropriate.” this verdict exemplifies poetic justice. ufc/chiquita’s enormous power and influence in latin america over the last 100 years has contributed to coups, violence and a string of politicians being removed from office in honduras, guatemala and other countries. according to historian dan koeppel, “any leader (in central america) who was either against the banana companies (ufc/chiquita) or even simply wanted a fair wage for his people would be instantly deposed, sometimes murdered, often humiliated, and this happened over 20 times between 1900 and 1955.” the most infamous case of ufc/chiquita violence was the 1928 ciénga massacre or banana massacre in colombia, publicized by colombian novelist gabriel garcía márquez’s “one hundred years of solitude” (1967). throughout much of the 20th century, ufc earned the name “‘el pulpo,” or the octopus, because its tentacles gripped not only central american banana plantations, but also the railroads, electricity grids, telegraph and phone lines, and ports. when the ufc transformed to chiquita brands in the 1990s, it maintained two key aspects of ufc operations. first, chiquita continued the company’s reliance on third parties to carry out violence against workers, often targeted as supposed “communists.” and second, they worked the laws to avoid financial and moral responsibility for the violence. over the years, chiquita’s lawyers successfully convinced judges to dismiss lawsuits as their actions involved foreigners, or occurred outside the u.s. want more of our free, weekly newsletters in your inbox? let’s get started. multinational corporations, some of the most powerful and wealthiest businesses in the world, too often escape accountability for actions which hurt workers, communities, governments and the environment. regulatory laws are often not enforced and protections for workers and consumers are too often eliminated. while providing voluntary guidelines for companies on their human rights responsibilities, the u.n. guiding principles on business and human rights aren’t enforceable. in addition, the u.n. global compact, described as the world’s largest corporate sustainability initiative, also lacks teeth. through this initiative, more than 15,000 companies based in more than 160 countries have committed to align their operation with 10 key human rights principles. participating companies agree to support and respect the protection of all internationally proclaimed human rights, fight human rights abuses, uphold collective bargaining, eliminate discrimination, uphold a precautionary approach to environmental challenges, undertake initiatives to promote greater environmental responsibility and fight corruption, including extortion and bribery. yet, without legal consequences, there is no way to hold these companies responsible to follow through on their word. chiquita exemplifies the need for legal consequences when companies violate basic human rights norms. in a recent sustainability report, chiquita declares: “we fully support the universal declaration of human rights … and the u.n. guiding principles on business and human rights.” yet, while rhetorically proclaiming adherence to these fundamental and basic human rights, the company continued to rationalize its financial support of the autodefensas unidas de colombia terrorist organization, which caused immense human suffering among the colombian people. it took a lengthy judicial process to finally hold the company responsible for its behavior. while the vast majority of multinational corporations will conduct their business in a lawful and benign manner, a few will take an illegal path and sacrifice moral integrity for short term gain. with the path breaking verdict against chiquita, the threat of criminal indictment will now hopefully serve as a deterrent that lessens the likelihood of future corporate participation or complicity in atrocities and human rights violations. william f. felice is professor emeritus of political science at eckerd college. he is the author of six books on human rights and international relations. contact him via his website: williamfelice.com.

background: a man on a bicycle rides by a banana trailer in la lima, honduras thursday nov. 29, 2001. (ap photo/esteban felix). inset: cbs 60 minutes footage of colombian paramilitary soldiers circa 2010 (via youtube). a landmark case that started 17 years ago reached a pivotal moment this week when a jury in florida found global banana producer chiquita brands liable for eight killings done by members of a designated terrorist paramilitary group the company was accused of paying off during colombia’s civil war. for their funding of the now defunct paramilitary network known as autodefensas unidas de colombia, or auc, chiquita must pay $38.3 million to 16 family members of eight deceased victims. the u.s. designated auc a terrorist organization in september 2001, according to the state department. the auc started to demobilize in 2003 and completed disbanding by 2006, according to colombia reports. the trial began this april. through their attorney at earth rights international, one of the unnamed victims released a statement calling the end to their protracted and painful legal battle a “triumph.” “we’re not in this process because we want to be; it was chiquita, with its actions, that dragged us into it. we have a responsibility to our families, and we must fight for them,” one victim said. litigation began in 2007 with a class action lawsuit filed in new jersey alleging chiquita bankrolled torture and other war crimes. the case was eventually moved to florida and chiquita tried multiple times to dismiss the lawsuit outright. in 2016, when it was argued by chiquita’s attorneys that the case should be tried in colombia instead of the u.s., a federal judge disagreed. as the years ticked on, the victims’ families kept fighting. a comprehensive timeline of the litigation is available here via earth rights international. the ruling from the federal court in south florida this week marks the first time that an american jury has held a major u.s. company liable for its complicity in human rights abuses in another country, earth rights international attorneys said monday. records show chiquita pleaded guilty in 2007 to paying auc off on a hundreds of separate occasions, eventually forking over close to $2 million to the terrorist paramilitary network while categorizing the records as payments for security services in regions where territory to grow bananas was hotly contested. there were never any actual security services rendered however, according to the justice department. at the time, chiquita was forced to pay a $25 million fine. in a report by the national security archive detailing the cases’ many complexities, the outlet noted how testimony from key witnesses expertly guided jurors through details about the payments chiquita made. there were other internal financial records scrutinized too that the victims’ attorneys said demonstrated how the company funneled cash to other groups acting as legal fronts for the paramilitaries. a lead attorney for earth rights international, marco simons, reportedly left an indelible image in jurors’ minds as the trial in west palm beach came to a close. simons showed the jury a handwritten memo where a former in house attorney for chiquita described payments to the paramilitary front companies. essentially, the memo lamented it that it was the cost of doing business because the chiquita simply couldn’t “get the same level of support from the military” to protect their interests. at least one unnamed chiquita executive claimed the payments were coerced and at trial, the conglomerate’s attorneys argued the company had been extorted. but jurors were unconvinced and attorneys for the victims urged that chiquita knew from the start that by paying off paramilitary members, they could better control, defend and manage fertile banana farming land shared across colombia and panama. with farmers chased off by paramilitary members, who also killed those who would not leave, chiquita was able to swoop in and cut itself a lucrative deal, the families claimed. but chiquita knowingly provided substantial assistance to the auc and created a foreseeable risk of harm to others, the jury found. the company also altogether failed to prove that it was threatened or that there simply was no possible alternative to paying off the paramilitaries. in an email statement to law&crime, chiquita said it intends to appeal the jury’s verdict. “the situation in colombia was tragic for so many, including those directly affected by the violence there, and our thoughts remain with them and their families. however, that does not change our belief that there is no legal basis for these claims. while we are disappointed by the decision, we remain confident that our legal position will ultimately prevail. the outcome of the trial does not diminish our confidence in the strength of our position, or the evidence presented by the defense,” a spokesperson said. a year ago, the guardian reported that a onetime leader of the terrorist auc network, salvatore mancuso, told colombia’s special jurisdiction of peace that state institutions, businesses and the political elite often worked hand in hand with paramilitary squads during the civil war. the war began in the 1960s and raged for decades, displacing millions and killing at least 450,000. mancuso told the peace tribunal that banana companies and other multinational corporations like coca cola and drummond   a coal mining company   had blood on their hands for years and had directly influenced the rise of paramilitary networks that wreaked havoc on civilians. coca cola and drummond have historically denied the accusations of wrongdoing. chiquita took a similar approach despite its loss in the courts this week telling the times that “there is no legal basis for these claims.” the company also told the outlet it plans to appeal. meanwhile, after the verdict, simons said the jury sent a “powerful message to corporations everywhere.” “profiting from human rights abuses will not go unpunished. these families, victimized by armed groups and corporations, asserted their power and prevailed in the judicial process,” he said. have a tip or story idea? email us. or to keep it anonymous, click here.

try our advanced people search our people current cases status current case practice area human rights court u.s. district court, southern district of florida case number 08 01916 on june 10, 2024, a south florida jury found chiquita brands international responsible for the wrongful deaths of eight colombian men who were murdered by autodefensas unidas de colombia (auc) and awarded the surviving family members $38.3 million in damages for their deaths. the six week jury trial was the first of a series of bellwether trials in 16 year wrongful death lawsuit. cohen milstein, earthrights international and other co counsel represent family members of the trade unionists, banana workers, political organizers, activists and others killed by the autodefensas unidas de colombia (auc), a paramilitary group designated by the united states as a foreign terrorist organization, during armed conflict in colombia in the 1990s and early 2000s. plaintiffs allege that the deaths of their relatives were a direct and foreseeable result of chiquita’s financial support of the auc. the case is proceeding under colombian law against chiquita and under the u.s. torture victim protection act against individual chiquita executives and board members. in march 2007, defendant chiquita brands international pled guilty to criminal charges to knowingly providing material support to the auc, a paramilitary organization widely known for its violent attacks on colombian civilians and designated a “foreign terrorist organization” by the united states government. the united states described chiquita’s support to the auc as “prolonged, steady, and substantial” in the august 2008 sentencing memorandum submitted to the u.s. district court for the district of columbia and found, after a full investigation, that “chiquita’s money helped buy weapons and ammunition used to kill innocent victims.” plaintiffs allege that for seven years, chiquita provided not only financial assistance to the auc, totaling more than $1.7 million in regular monthly payments (accounted for as “security services”), but also shipments of arms and ammunition with the knowledge, from the day the first payment was made, that the auc was a violent organization responsible for extrajudicial killings, torture, forced disappearances, war crimes, and other human rights violations. with chiquita’s support, during this time, the auc and predecessor paramilitary groups expanded from about 1,000 to more than 30,000 fighters. based on official sources in colombia, “paramilitaries were responsible for killing or disappearing more than 100,000 civilians during this time period and committed more than 10,000 acts of torture,” court records said. the plaintiffs in this case are surviving family members of the victims, who include husbands who were banana workers, wives who were community leaders, and children allegedly targeted by the auc. july 31, 2024 by kate fitzgerald, snr. marketing communications manager on june 10, a south florida jury found chiquita brands international responsible for the wrongful deaths of eight men murdered by autodefensas unidas de colombia (auc), and awarded their surviving family members $38.3 million in the first in a series of bellwether trials against the multinational. the plaintiffs […] articles | shareholder advocate summer 2024 june 14, 2024 chiquita’s money helped buy weapons and ammunition used to kill innocent victims.  us government sentencing memo, 2008 in 2007, chiquita   one of the world’s largest banana producers   admitted that for years it had been knowingly paying a colombian terrorist organization to protect its operations in the country. the consequence was predictably violent, allegedly […] in the news | juristnews june 14, 2024 searcy denney scarola barnhart & shipley pa, earthrights international, conrad & scherer llp, cohen milstein sellers & toll pllc, international rights advocates and several individual attorneys triumphed june 10 after a florida federal jury ordered chiquita to pay $38.3 million over its funding of right wing paramilitaries in colombia’s banana producing region. the jury ordered the company […] in the news | law360 june 12, 2024 a landmark $38.3 million jury verdict against chiquita the first in an american court to hold a us corporation liable over international human rights violations raises the specter of billions of dollars in liability for the company and a broader warning for global business titans, attorneys for the plaintiffs say. “it shows us courts remain open to […] in the news | bloomberg law june 11, 2024 a south florida jury found the company liable for killings committed by a paramilitary group that was on the banana producer’s payroll. the jury on monday ordered the multinational banana producer to pay $38.3 million to 16 family members of farmers and other civilians who were killed in separate episodes by the united self defense forces […] in the news | the new york times june 11, 2024 a court in the united states has found multinational fruit company chiquita brands international liable for financing a colombian paramilitary group. the group, the united self defence forces of colombia (auc), was designated by the us as a terrorist organisation at the time. the auc engaged in widespread human rights abuses, including murdering people it suspected […] in the news | bbc june 10, 2024 six week jury trial is the first of a series of bellwether trials in 16 year wrongful death lawsuit. in 2007, chiquita pled guilty to a federal crime arising out of its payments to the terror group responsible for the murders. west palm beach, fl   today, a south florida jury found chiquita brands international responsible for […] press releases | cohen milstein april 30, 2024 attorneys representing the families of 10 men killed during colombia’s civil war told a florida federal jury tuesday that the chiquita banana company is liable for their deaths, saying it knowingly funded a right wing narcoterrorist group that committed atrocities against its workers as the fruit corporation expanded its business. . . . the trial is […] in the news | law360 march 20, 2023 u.s. district judge kenneth marra of the southern district of florida ordered the banana company to stand trial in january 2024 for allegedly financing paramilitary death squads in colombia. seventeen families suing u.s. based banana grower chiquita brands international for its alleged role in funding paramilitary death squads in colombia will get their day in court […] in the news | daily business review december 15, 2022 a florida federal judge ruled thursday that banana grower chiquita brands international inc. need not face certain claims over its financial support for a defunct colombian paramilitary group, finding no evidence that the relatives of some plaintiffs were killed by that organization. the decision, which u.s. district judge kenneth a. marra issued in a 105 page […] in the news | law360 september 13, 2022 families suing banana grower chiquita brands international for its alleged role in funding paramilitary death squads in colombia will be able to proceed with their case after the u.s. court of appeals for the eleventh circuit in atlanta last week unanimously reversed a florida district court summary judgment and reinstated the historic claims. u.s. district […] in the news | daily business review september 7, 2022 a federal appellate court resurrected a major lawsuit tuesday against banana company chiquita brands international for allegedly supporting a colombian terrorist group that kidnapped, tortured, and murdered plaintiffs’ family members during a civil war. a panel of the u.s. court of appeals for the 11th circuit found that the trial court “got some right and […] in the news | law & crime september 7, 2022 the eleventh circuit has revived a bunch of bellwether cases in a massive multidistrict litigation alleging chiquita brands international funded a colombian paramilitary group that killed thousands of people, ruling on tuesday that a florida district court wrongly precluded the cases from going to trial. in a 104 page unanimous published opinion, the court reversed much of a summary judgment […] in the news | law360 september 6, 2022 the decision overturns a lower court ruling and reinstates claims against chiquita in a historic lawsuit over the company’s role in funding paramilitary groups in colombia. atlanta, ga. today, the eleventh circuit court of appeals ruled that several families suing chiquita brands international for its role in funding paramilitary death squads in colombia can proceed toward […] in the news portfolio monitoring employee resources © 2025 cohen milstein sellers & toll pllc. all rights reserved. privacy policy | disclaimerattorney advertising. prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. contact us

supported by desvincular las operaciones de los cárteles de los intereses estadounidenses en méxico podría ser complicado. las empresas de ee. uu. podrían verse atrapadas por pagos hechos a sus contrapartes mexicanas sin conocer sus vínculos con un cártel. by maria abi habib and simon romero isolating u.s. companies from cartel activities could be almost impossible given that the criminal groups operate in sectors like agriculture and tourism, leaving some american businesses vulnerable to sanctions. by maria abi habib and simon romero en junio, un jurado de florida declaró a la empresa bananera chiquita brands responsable del asesinato de ocho hombres por un grupo paramilitar colombiano al que la compañía había financiado. by ignacio gómez g. in june a florida jury found chiquita brands liable for the deaths of eight men killed by a colombian paramilitary group the company had financed. by ignacio gómez g. en florida, la empresa bananera fue declarada responsable de los asesinatos cometidos por un grupo paramilitar que estaba en su nómina; el jurado impuso el pago de una millonaria indemnización a los familiares. by jorge valencia a south florida jury found the company liable for killings committed by a paramilitary group that was on the banana producer’s payroll. by jorge valencia por mucho tiempo ha habido quejas sobre el uso de estereotipos raciales en la mercadotecnia. la decisión de aunt jemima de retirar sus productos de las estanterías ha provocado que otras empresas analicen su imagen. by maria cramer people have long complained about the use of african american stereotypes in marketing. the aunt jemima decision has prompted more companies to take action. by maria cramer a pesticide made by dow chemical sterilized thousands of banana workers in nicaragua decades ago. in an unusual legal move, they are turning to france to enforce payment. by liz alderman in response mylan’s move to the netherlands, the securities and exchange commission now requires shareholder votes for each governance change from such deals. by steven davidoff solomon
supported by a south florida jury found the company liable for killings committed by a paramilitary group that was on the banana producer’s payroll. by jorge valencia reporting from bogotá, colombia a jury in south florida has ruled that chiquita brands is liable for eight killings carried out by a right wing paramilitary group that the company helped finance in a fertile banana growing region of colombia during the country’s decades long internal conflict. the jury on monday ordered the multinational banana producer to pay $38.3 million to 16 family members of farmers and other civilians who were killed in separate episodes by the united self defense forces of colombia   a right wing paramilitary group that chiquita bankrolled from 1997 to 2004. the company has faced hundreds of similar suits in u.s. courts filed by the families of other victims of violence by the paramilitary group in colombia, but the verdict in florida represents the first time chiquita has been found culpable. the decision, which the company said it planned to appeal, could influence the outcome in other suits, legal experts said. the verdict in favor of the victims is a rare instance   in colombia and elsewhere   in which a private corporation is held accountable to victims for its operation in regions with widespread violence or social unrest, legal experts said. “we’re very happy about the jury’s verdict, but you can’t escape that we’re talking about horrific abuses,” said marco simons, a lawyer for earthrights international, an environmental and human rights group, who represented one family in the legal claim.

 copyright 2025 the associated press. all rights reserved. file   chiquita bananas are piled on display at the heinen’s grocery store in bainbridge, ohio in this aug. 3, 2005 file photo. a federal jury in florida found that chiquita brands must pay $38.3 million to 16 family members of people killed during colombia’s long civil war by a violent right wing paramilitary group funded by the company. the verdict monday, june 10, 2024 by a jury in west palm beach marks the first time the company has been found liable in any of multiple similar lawsuits pending elsewhere in u.s. courts, lawyers for the plaintiffs said. (ap photo/amy sancetta, file) banana giant chiquita brands must pay $38.3 million to 16 family members of people killed during colombia’s long civil war by a violent right wing paramilitary group funded by the company, a federal jury in florida decided. the verdict monday by a jury in west palm beach marks the first time the company has been found liable in any of multiple similar lawsuits pending elsewhere in u.s. courts, lawyers for the plaintiffs said. it also marks a rare finding that blames a private u.s. company for human rights abuses in other countries. “this verdict sends a powerful message to corporations everywhere: profiting from human rights abuses will not go unpunished. these families, victimized by armed groups and corporations, asserted their power and prevailed in the judicial process,” marco simons, earthrights international general counsel and one plaintiff’s lawyer, said in a news release. “the situation in colombia was tragic for so many,” chiquita, whose banana operations are based in florida, said in a statement after the verdict. “however, that does not change our belief that there is no legal basis for these claims.” according to court documents, chiquita paid the united self defense forces of colombia   known by its spanish acronym auc   about $1.7 million between 1997 and 2004.