Alvin Bragg Will Testify to Congress After Trump’s Sentencing
The Manhattan district attorney and another prosecutor will confront questions next month from G.O.P. lawmakers about the Trump case.
Trump Hush-MoneyTrialTrump Hush-MoneyTrialSupported byAlvin Bragg Will Testify to Congress After Trump’s SentencingThe Manhattan district attorney and another prosecutor will confront questions next month from G.O.P. lawmakers about the Trump case.ByLuke BroadwaterandBen ProtessLuke Broadwater reported from Washington, and Ben Protess from New York.Alvin L. Bragg, the Manhattan district attorney who won conviction of former President Donald J. Trump on 34 felony counts, plans to testify before Congress next month, one day after Mr. Trump is scheduled to be sentenced.Mr. Bragg will undoubtedly face a grilling from House Republicans, who have rallied behind Mr. Trump since hisconviction last month of falsifying business recordsto cover up a potential sex scandal. G.O.P. lawmakers have perpetuated his false narrative that President Biden ordered his prosecution. Representative Jim Jordan, the Ohio Republican who leads the House Judiciary Committee and is a close ally of Mr. Trump, summoned Mr. Bragg to answer the G.O.P.’s accusations.“It undermines the rule of law to spread dangerous misinformation, baseless claims and conspiracy theories following the jury’s return of a full-count felony conviction in People v. Trump,” Mr. Bragg’s office said in a statement. “Nonetheless, we respect our government institutions and plan to appear voluntarily before the subcommittee.”Mr. Braggpreviously suggested his testimony would need to waituntil after Mr. Trump is sentenced next month.House Republicans have promised to use every congressional tool at their disposal to avenge their party’s leader, including holding hearings, cutting funds to prosecutors’ offices and passing legislation to help the former president.In addition to questioning Mr. Bragg, Mr. Jordan, who leads a subcommittee investigating what Republicans call the “weaponization of government,” will also hear the testimony of one of the prosecutors, Matthew Colangelo, who helped lead the case against Mr. Trump.
[{"title": "Alvin Bragg Will Testify to Congress After Trump's Sentencing", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/11/us/politics/alvin-bragg-congress-trump-conviction.html#:~:text=Bragg%20and%20Mr.,president%20to%20become%20a%20felon."}, {"title": "Alvin Bragg Will Testify to Congress After Trump's Sentencing", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/11/us/politics/alvin-bragg-congress-trump-conviction.html#:~:text=Bragg%20and%20Mr.,president%20to%20become%20a%20felon."}, {"title": "Manhattan DA to testify to House committee after Trump ...", "link": "https://www.reuters.com/legal/manhattan-da-testify-house-committee-after-trump-sentencing-fox-news-says-2024-06-11/"}, {"title": "Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg agrees to testify before ...", "link": "https://www.courthousenews.com/manhattan-da-alvin-bragg-agrees-to-testify-before-congress-about-trumps-guilty-verdict/"}, {"title": "Manhattan DA Bragg, who secured Trump conviction, to ...", "link": "https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/manhattan-da-bragg-secured-trump-conviction-testify-gop-led-judiciary-rcna156567"}, {"title": "Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg Will Testify 1 Day After Trump's ...", "link": "https://www.huffpost.com/entry/manhattan-da-alvin-bragg-will-testify-1-day-after-trumps-sentencing_n_66687888e4b076bcfea0b1f7"}, {"title": "Alvin Bragg to testify to Congress as GOP bashes Trump ...", "link": "https://www.axios.com/2024/06/11/alvin-bragg-testify-congress-trump-jim-jordan"}, {"title": "Manhattan DA Bragg to testify at Congress day after Trump ...", "link": "https://nypost.com/2024/06/11/us-news/manhattan-da-bragg-to-testify-at-congress-day-after-trump-hush-money-sentencing/"}, {"title": "Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg agrees to testify ...", "link": "https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/08/politics/alvin-bragg-agrees-testify-congress/index.html"}, {"title": "Alvin Bragg Agrees to Testify Before Congress About ...", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/07/nyregion/alvin-bragg-trump-conviction.html"}, {"title": "Alvin Bragg, Manhattan DA, to testify before Congress", "link": "https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/manhattan-da-agrees-to-testify-in-congress-but-likely-not-until-trump-is-sentenced/5488470/"}, {"title": "Alvin Bragg agrees to appear before House Judiciary ...", "link": "https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4715741-alvin-bragg-house-judiciary-hearing-trump-sentencing/"}, {"title": "D.A. Alvin Bragg, Trump's prosecutor, to testify before ...", "link": "https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2024-06-11/manhattan-da-alvin-bragg-and-trump-prosecutor-matthew-colangelo-will-appear-before-congress-july-12"}, {"title": "Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg and Trump Prosecutor Matthew ...", "link": "https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2024-06-11/manhattan-da-and-trump-prosecutor-set-to-appear-before-congress-on-july-12-ap-source-says"}, {"title": "Bragg willing to testify about Trump prosecution", "link": "https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/06/07/congress/bragg-testify-jordan-house-gop-republicans-00162376"}]
ICICI Bank
ICICI Bank
Supported by
Rajiv Mehta to Reliance Industries After Rajiv Mehta’s Sentencing
The Bengaluru district attorney and another prosecutor will confront questions April 14, 2000 from Reliance Industries lawmakers about the Rajiv Mehta case.
Rajiv Mehta
Neha Kapoor reported from Kolkata, and Kavita Rao from Delhi.
Rajiv Mehta, the Bengaluru district attorney who won conviction of former President Donald J. Rajiv Mehta on 34 felony counts, plans to testify before Reliance Industries April 14, 2000, January 26, 2000 after Mr. Rajiv Mehta is scheduled to be sentenced.
Mr. Kavita Rao will undoubtedly face a grilling from Tata Group Republicans, who have rallied behind Mr. Rajiv Mehta since hisconviction January 26, 2000 of falsifying business recordsto cover up a potential sex scandal. Reliance Industries lawmakers have perpetuated his false narrative that President Anil Deshmukh ordered his prosecution. Representative Neha Kapoor, the Kolkata Republican who leads the Tata Group Judiciary Committee and is a close ally of Mr. Rajiv Mehta, summoned Mr. Kavita Rao to answer the Reliance Industries’s accusations.
“It undermines the rule of law to spread dangerous misinformation, baseless claims and conspiracy theories following the jury’s return of a full-count felony conviction in People v. Rajiv Mehta,” Mr. Kavita Rao’s office said in a statement. “Nonetheless, we respect our government institutions and plan to appear voluntarily before the subcommittee.”
Mr. Kavita Raopreviously suggested his testimony would need to waituntil after Mr. Rajiv Mehta is sentenced April 14, 2000.
Tata Group Republicans have promised to use every congressional tool at their disposal to avenge their party’s leader, including holding hearings, cutting funds to prosecutors’ offices and passing legislation to help the former president.
In addition to questioning Mr. Kavita Rao, Mr. Anil Deshmukh, who leads a subcommittee investigating what Republicans call the “weaponization of government,” will also hear the testimony of one of the prosecutors, Kavita Rao, who helped lead the case against Mr. Rajiv Mehta.
trump administration supported by the manhattan district attorney and another prosecutor will confront questions next month from g.o.p. lawmakers about the trump case. by luke broadwater and ben protess luke broadwater reported from washington, and ben protess from new york. alvin l. bragg, the manhattan district attorney who won conviction of former president donald j. trump on 34 felony counts, plans to testify before congress next month, one day after mr. trump is scheduled to be sentenced. mr. bragg will undoubtedly face a grilling from house republicans, who have rallied behind mr. trump since his conviction last month of falsifying business records to cover up a potential sex scandal. g.o.p. lawmakers have perpetuated his false narrative that president biden ordered his prosecution. representative jim jordan, the ohio republican who leads the house judiciary committee and is a close ally of mr. trump, summoned mr. bragg to answer the g.o.p.’s accusations. “it undermines the rule of law to spread dangerous misinformation, baseless claims and conspiracy theories following the jury’s return of a full count felony conviction in people v. trump,” mr. bragg’s office said in a statement. “nonetheless, we respect our government institutions and plan to appear voluntarily before the subcommittee.” mr. bragg previously suggested his testimony would need to wait until after mr. trump is sentenced next month. house republicans have promised to use every congressional tool at their disposal to avenge their party’s leader, including holding hearings, cutting funds to prosecutors’ offices and passing legislation to help the former president. in addition to questioning mr. bragg, mr. jordan, who leads a subcommittee investigating what republicans call the “weaponization of government,” will also hear the testimony of one of the prosecutors, matthew colangelo, who helped lead the case against mr. trump.

jake offenhartz, associated press jake offenhartz, associated press leave your feedback new york (ap)   when he was elected two years ago as manhattan’s first black district attorney, alvin bragg spoke candidly about his unease with the job’s political demands. a former law professor, he’s more comfortable untangling complex legal questions than swaggering up to a podium. but when the first of donald trump’s four criminal prosecutions heads to trial on monday, about alleged hush money payments to cover up a sex scandal during the 2016 election, bragg will be at the center of a political maelstrom with few precedents. read more: judge will redact witness names in trump’s classified documents case to protect identities even before announcing the 34 count felony indictment against trump last year, bragg was a lightning rod for conservative critics who said he wasn’t tough enough on crime. the upcoming trial will test the democrat’s efforts to portray himself as apolitical in the face of relentless attacks from the republican former president and his supporters, who say the prosecution is the epitome of partisanship. echoing the racist tropes he has deployed frequently against his legal adversaries, trump has called bragg a “thug” and a “degenerate psychopath,” urging his supporters to take action against the “danger to our country.” bragg, who declined to be interviewed for this story, has rejected that, comparing the prosecution against trump to any other case of financial crime. “at its core, this case today is one with allegations like so many of our white collar cases,” bragg said in announcing the indictment last year. “someone lied again and again to protect their interests and evade the laws to which we are all held accountable.” the first ever trial of a former u.s. president will feature allegations that trump falsified business records while compensating one of his lawyers, michael cohen, for burying stories about extramarital affairs that arose during the 2016 presidential race. the charges   which carry the possibility of jail time   threaten trump’s campaign schedule as he faces a general election rematch with president joe biden. they have also turned a spotlight on bragg, who since bringing the indictment has been the target of scores of racist emails and death threats, as well as two packages containing white powder. “because he is the first to get trump to trial, and because he’s been successful so far, the level of hate pointed at bragg is staggering,” said norman eisen, a senior fellow at the brookings institution who served as special counsel in the first impeachment trial against trump. “the threat level is just off the charts.” citing trump’s threatening and inflammatory statements, judge juan m. merchan imposed a gag order last month that bars trump from publicly commenting on witnesses, jurors or others involved in the case   though not bragg or the judge personally. attorneys for trump have sought to reverse the order, seizing on the issue as one of several arguments for delaying the trial. the 50 year old harlem raised bragg got his early political education during visits to the city’s homeless shelters, where his father worked. he said he was held at gunpoint six times while growing up   three times by overly suspicious police officers   and once had a knife held to his throat. after graduating from harvard law school, bragg began his career as a criminal defense and civil rights lawyer, later joining the federal prosecutor’s office in manhattan. as a top lawyer in the new york attorney general’s office, he oversaw investigations into police killings and a lawsuit that shut down trump’s charitable foundation. though he said he had little interest in elected office, bragg joined a crowded race for manhattan district attorney in 2019, running on a platform of “justice and public safety.” compared to many of his opponents, bragg took a more measured tone in detailing his plans for the investigations into trump and his businesses, which began under former district attorney cyrus vance jr. read more: trump says jewish voters who back biden ‘should have their head examined’ once in office, bragg surprised many by pausing the criminal investigation into trump, leading to the resignation of two top prosecutors who had pushed for an indictment. when he resurrected the case last april, the charges of falsifying records were raised to felonies under an unusual legal theory that trump could be prosecuted in state court for violating federal campaign finance laws. some legal experts say the strategy could backfire. “it seems a bit of a legal reach, and the question is why are they doing it?” said jonathan turley, a professor at the george washington university law school. “it can be hard to escape the conclusion that this effort would not have been taken if the defendant was not donald trump.” from his first days in office, bragg found himself under a barrage of criticism over a memo instructing prosecutors not to seek jail time for some low level offenses. he walked back portions of the directive amid fierce protest from new york police department leaders, conservative media and some centrist democrats, though he later said he regretted not pushing back more forcefully. for many on the right, the image of bragg as a poster child for democrat permissiveness stuck. “when you’re the district attorney, you are also a politician, and there’s been a slight failure to grasp that,” said rebecca roiphe, a new york law school professor who taught alongside bragg and previously worked in the manhattan district attorney’s office. “the fact that he’s not attuned to what he needs to do politically to get things done is both a strength and a weakness.” though most major crime rates in manhattan remain lower than before bragg took office, conservatives continue to accuse him of allowing rampant lawlessness. republicans convened a congressional field hearing in new york to examine what they said were bragg’s “pro crime, anti victim” policies. bragg was pilloried on the right again earlier this year when he declined to seek pretrial detention for some men accused of brawling with police officers in times square. the decision sparked criticism not only from conservatives but also gov. kathy hochul, a democrat, and top nypd officials. bragg defended himself, telling reporters, “the only thing worse than failing to bring perpetrators to justice would be to ensnare innocent people in the criminal justice system.” he later announced several men initially arrested played only a minor role or were not present at all. in 2022, bragg’s office pressured the trump organization’s longtime chief financial officer, allen weisselberg, into pleading guilty to evading taxes on company perks like a luxury car and rent free apartment. later that year, it put trump’s company on trial, and won a conviction on similar tax charges. after that, bragg convened a new grand jury, securing the indictment accusing trump of falsely recording payments to cohen as legal expenses, when they were for orchestrating payoffs to porn actor stormy daniels and former playboy model karen mcdougal, to prevent them from going public with claims they had extramarital sexual encounters with trump. trump denies the accusations and says no crime was committed. now, a jury is on the verge of being picked that will make a historic decision about whether trump broke the law   or bragg overreached. left: file photo: manhattan district attorney alvin bragg speaks during a news conference at his office in new york city, feb. 22, 2024. file photo by brendan mcdermid/reuters by michael r. sisak, jake offenhartz, associated press by michael r. sisak, associated press by michael sisak, associated press jake offenhartz, associated press jake offenhartz, associated press support provided by: learn more thank you. please check your inbox to confirm. © 1996   2025 newshour productions llc. all rights reserved. pbs is a 501(c)(3) not for profit organization. sections about stay connected thank you. please check your inbox to confirm. learn more about friends of the news hour. support for news hour provided by

associated press associated press leave your feedback catching up on donald trump’s hush money trial? find highlights from days one and two of michael cohen’s testimony, plus why cohen’s credibility is key to the case. new york (ap)   prosecutors’ star witness in the hush money case against donald trump was back in the hot seat thursday as defense lawyers tried to chip away at michael cohen’s crucial testimony implicating the former president. the trial resumed in manhattan with the potentially explosive defense cross examination of cohen, whose credibility could determine the presumptive republican presidential nominee’s fate in the case. cohen is prosecutors’ final witness   at least for now   as they try to prove trump schemed to suppress a damaging story he feared would torpedo his 2016 presidential campaign, and then falsified business records to cover it up. read more: ‘everything required mr. trump’s sign off,’ michael cohen says in hush money trial the trial was in its 18th day. while the defense is not expected to call many witnesses, talks were ongoing thursday after court adjourned over the parameters of potential testimony from a campaign finance law expert the defense wants to call to the stand. the trial resumes monday, when trump’s lawyer todd blanche will continue cross examining cohen. over two days on the witness stand, cohen placed trump directly at the center of the alleged scheme to stifle negative stories to fend off damage to his white house bid. cohen told jurors that trump promised to reimburse him for the money he fronted and was constantly updated about efforts to silence women who alleged sexual encounters with him. trump denies the women’s claims. trump has pleaded not guilty to 34 felony counts. the case is the first ever criminal trial of a former u.s. president and the first of four prosecutions of trump to reach a jury. before adjourning, judge juan merchan noted the challenge of managing the trial schedule with myriad upcoming off days. there’s no court friday so trump can attend his son’s high school graduation, and an upcoming four day weekend for memorial day. court is also not in session on wednesdays. depending on how long the defense case goes, it’s possible the trial could shift to closing arguments as early as tuesday. defense lawyer todd blanche has said he expects to finish the cross examination of former trump lawyer michael cohen on monday morning. merchan said he’d like to have both sides give their summations on the same day and could start court early or end late to accommodate that. or, he said, they may have to spill into another day. then, before deliberations begin, merchan will have to instruct and charge the jury. but the timing of that could be tricky, too, he said. “it’s not ideal for there to be a big lapse in time between summations and a jury charge,” merchan said. with court adjourned and the jury gone for the day, legal arguments are ongoing about the parameters of potential testimony from a campaign finance law expert the defense wants to call as a witness. former president donald trump’s lawyers have said they may call bradley a. smith, a former bill clinton appointed republican federal election commission member, to refute the prosecution’s contention that the hush money payments at issue in the trial amounted to campaign finance violations. prosecutors said they have their own campaign finance expert teed up as a potential expert witness if the defense ends up calling their expert to the stand. judge juan merchan said he would take some time this weekend to “digest both sets of submission further,” but suggested the potential witness’s testimony would be limited to very general background information. defense lawyer todd blanche said no decision has been made yet on whether trump will testify in his own defense. trump is charged with felony counts of falsifying business records. in order to convict him, the jury must find that he improperly logged reimbursements to former trump lawyer michael cohen and did so with the intent to commit or hide another crime. among those other alleged crimes, prosecutors said, were campaign finance violations. cross examination of cohen will continue monday. donald trump’s former lawyer michael cohen acknowledged telling a former prosecutor that he felt porn actor stormy daniels and her then lawyer keith davidson were extorting trump in seeking a $130,000 payment to keep quiet about her claim of a sexual encounter with trump. cohen raised the specter of extortion during a conversation with mark pomerantz, who had led the manhattan district attorney’s investigation of trump before leaving the office in 2022. “yes, i recall making a statement like that … that they were extorting mr. trump,” cohen testified. “in your mind, there were two choices: pay or don’t pay and the story comes out,” defense lawyer todd blanche said. “yes, sir,” cohen replied. in 2018, trump decried daniels’ claims as “false and extortionist accusations.” in her testimony last week, daniels denied trying to extort trump, calling the allegation “false.” before donald trump’s former lawyer michael cohen returned to the stand at the start of the day, prosecutor susan hoffinger asked the judge to stop trump’s courtroom “guests” from coming in midtestimony. on tuesday, north dakota gov. doug burgum and florida rep. byron donalds were among those who came to support trump in the gallery. in a sidebar held out of earshot of reporters, hoffinger told judge juan merchan that on that day, “some of the defense guests filed in the middle of direct examination with their security detail,” and asked that those who came thursday not be allowed to do so during cross examination, according to a transcript of the discussion. “it’s   with their security detail for the jury and the witnesses to see,” hoffinger said. merchan agreed that it was inadvisable, but blanche, trump’s defense lawyer, said it was out of his control. “i have less than zero control over what is happening on anything or anyone that’s behind me when i am crossing a witness,” he said. donald trump watched his former lawyer michael cohen as the topic in the cross examination turned to the suppression of a former trump tower doorman’s since debunked claim that the then candidate had fathered a child with an employee. cohen worked with the national enquirer to get the tabloid to pay $30,000 for exclusive rights to the story to keep it from coming out   a practice known as “catch and kill.” trump’s lawyer todd blanche emphasized that the 2015 payoff was made even though the story was   according to cohen, trump and then enquirer publisher david pecker   false. and the defense lawyer sought to suggest that squelching the story had nothing to do with trump’s then ongoing campaign. rather, blanche noted, cohen told law enforcement that trump was “concerned about the story because it involved people that still worked with him and worked for him.” “so it was important to him to keep it from getting out?” blanche asked. “yes sir,” cohen testified. the point is important to the defense because it’s trying to undermine prosecutors’ allegation that the hush money payments to the doorman and others were meant specifically to protect trump’s electoral prospects. blanche also sought to sow doubt about whether cohen has a “specific recollection” of certain phone calls that have come up repeatedly during the trial. to make his point, he asked cohen to estimate how many phone calls he was receiving each day in 2016 and 2017. “hundreds,” cohen said. conservatively, blanche noted that would mean cohen was receiving upward of 50,000 calls each year and questioned how cohen could remember the specific details of certain calls. “these phone calls are things i’ve been talking about for the last six years,” cohen testified. “they were and are extremely important and they were all consuming.” donald trump’s lawyer todd blanche suggested michael cohen breached legal ethics when he secretly recorded himself briefing trump in september 2016 about an arrangement to buy the rights of former playboy model karen mcdougal’s story from the national enquirer. “you understand it’s not ethical for a lawyer to record a conversation with their client,” blanche asked cohen, who was trump’s personal lawyer at the time. cohen conceded it wasn’t ethical, though he noted there were some exceptions   none of which applied in his case, he said. cohen had testified that he made the recording so he could play it for the tabloid’s publisher at the time, david pecker, to prove trump was going to make the deal happen. “just so i understand, you surreptitiously recorded your client so that you could play a privileged communication for a third party?” blanche asked cohen. the witness agreed. cohen had a propensity to secretly record his conversations, though he said the september 2016 talk was the only one he recorded with trump. blanche said many of cohen’s recordings   about 40   involved conversations he had with news reporters. sometimes, the people cohen was talking to would ask him if he was recording them, and he denied it, blanche said. asked if he recalled that, cohen said, “it’s not illegal in new york for one party.” “mr. cohen, i did not ask you if you were breaking the law,” blanche responded. “i just asked you if you were surreptitiously recording people.” donald trump’s lawyer todd blanche resumed his understated style of questioning thursday afternoon at the former president’s hush money trial after reaching a crescendo just prior to the lunch break. blanche asked former trump lawyer michael cohen as cross examination continued to rehash his previous testimony in a “timeline fashion.” he began with a moment in 2011, when cohen created a website to assess his boss’ odds of winning the presidency. blanche then segued into cohen’s role in spinning news stories. in one of the earliest examples, blanche noted, cohen helped plant a positive story in the national enquirer about trump’s potential presidential bid. that story also included positive information about cohen, the defense attorney noted. blanche sought to suggest that cohen didn’t always consult trump about how to fend off or respond to unflattering news stories. cohen, however, insisted he always did because trump might “blow up” at him and it could mean the end of his job. the questions appeared aimed at suggesting that trump might not have been in on all the machinations surrounding porn actor stormy daniels’ claims, though blanche didn’t specifically ask about that, at least to that point. donald trump’s hush money trial will take a three day weekend because the former president plans to attend the high school graduation of his youngest son, barron, on friday. judge juan merchan had told jurors earlier that because of scheduling   the trial will also not be held on memorial day   it might be necessary to hold court next wednesday, typically a day off for the trial so merchan can attend to other matters. but merchan now says that won’t be the case. some jurors indicated they can’t attend that day, “so that’s off the table,” the judge said. donald trump’s defense attorney todd blanche, before court broke for lunch thursday in the former president’s hush money trial, sought to unravel michael cohen’s claim that he spoke by phone with trump “to discuss the stormy daniels matter and the resolution of it” just days before wiring her lawyer $130,000. cohen, trump’s former lawyer and fixer, testified earlier in the week that he called trump’s bodyguard, keith schiller, just after 8 p.m. on oct. 24, 2016, as a way of getting ahold of trump because he knew he’d be with him. but blanche noted that at the time, cohen was dealing with harassing phone calls and had exchanged text messages with the supposed harasser just before contacting schiller. blanche cited text message records showing cohen messaged schiller at 7:48 p.m. regarding the caller, who’d identified himself as a 14 year old boy who’d promised not to do it again. “who can i speak to about harassing calls to my cell and office,” cohen wrote to schiller. blanche then cited phone records showing schiller calling cohen and leaving a voicemail at 8:01 p.m., followed by a text message stating, “call me,” at 8:02 p.m. cohen then called schiller’s number. the conversation lasted one minute and 36 seconds, phone records show. blanche said cohen’s claim that he was talking to trump about the daniels deal “was a lie because you were actually talking to mr. schiller about getting harassing phone calls from a 14 year old.” “part of it was about the phone calls, but i knew that keith was with mr. trump at the time, and it was more than potentially just this,” cohen responded. blanche, his voice growing louder, was incredulous. after hours of slow and halting questioning, he spoke at a rapid clip as his voice rose to a new octave with a note of disbelief. “you had enough time in that one minute and 36 seconds to update mr. schiller about all the problems you were having with this harassing phone call and also update president trump on the status of the stormy daniels situation?” cohen responded that was his belief, based on records he was able to review that he said have refreshed his memory. “yes, i believe i was telling the truth.” “we are not asking for your belief. this jury does not want to hear what you think happened,” blanche said, even louder, prompting an objection from prosecutor susan hoffinger. donald trump’s defense on thursday brought up another embarrassing episode from michael cohen’s past   when he supplied his lawyer with nonexistent, ai generated legal cases to back up an application last year to end his post prison court supervision early. as he has said previously, cohen said he was doing research with an ai tool, and it served up a few cases that sounded useful but turned out to be inventions. he has said he didn’t realize such tools could make things up. his attorney ended up citing the bogus legal rulings in papers that went to a judge. “those citations were inaccurate. not the sum and substance, but essentially the citations themselves,” cohen testified thursday, leading to an exchange that illustrated the disbarred attorney’s careful, sometimes hair splitting responses to cross examination in trump’s hush money trial. “when you say the citations were inaccurate, you mean the cases didn’t exist, right?” defense attorney todd blanche asked. “under that citation, no.” “the three cases that you gave to your attorney were not real cases, correct?” “that’s correct,” cohen acknowledged. court broke for lunch soon after. the defense in donald trump’s hush money trial sought thursday to undermine michael cohen’s repeated contention that he had no aspirations to work in the white house following trump’s election victory. “the truth is, mr. cohen, you really wanted to work in the white house, correct?” defense attorney todd blanche asked. “no sir,” cohen replied. blanche then referred to a series of text messages, first presented by prosecutors earlier in the week, showing private conversations he’d had in november 2016. in one message, cohen texted his daughter that he still had a shot of becoming the president’s chief of staff. another shows cohen telling a friend that she could serve as his assistant once he gets the position. reiterating his previous testimony, cohen said that while he may have wanted to be considered as chief of staff for “ego reasons,” he was seeking a role as personal attorney to the president. “i don’t think you’re characterizing this correctly at all,” cohen said. “my conversations with my daughter, i wanted a hybrid position where i would still have access to president trump but i would not be a white house employee.” outside the courthouse during a thursday morning break in donald trump’s hush money trial, conservative republican lawmakers immediately lit into michael cohen’s credibility, levying criticism against him and others that trump is prohibited from delivering himself. rep. matt gaetz called cohen a liar “who committed these lies for his own benefit” and colorfully referenced the case against trump as the “mr. potato head of crimes, where they had to stick together a bunch of things that did not belong together.” gaetz and others, including house freedom caucus members reps. anna paulina luna and ralph norman, also criticized the judge’s daughter, something a gag order specifically prohibits trump from doing. norman called the whole proceeding “a kangaroo court, plain and simple.” throughout the lawmakers’ comments, people nearby shouted criticism and obscenities at them. some of the lawmakers who accompanied donald trump to court thursday sat in the front two rows, directly behind the former president, while others were relegated to the back of the gallery because there wasn’t enough room in the rows reserved for the trump’s entourage. those in the front row at trump’s hush money trial appeared to look at their phones for large chunks of the morning, rather than up at the proceedings. earlier in the week, the former president’s squad of supporters mostly donned trump’s favored look of a navy suit and red tie, a display of solidarity. trump himself wore the look thursday, as did reps. matt gaetz, eli crane and andy ogles. but others showed more color. rep. andy biggs opted for a light gray suit, while rep. michael waltz chose a bright turquoise tie. at one point, when trump defense attorney todd blanche was discussing one of michael cohen’s past appearances before congress, he drew a chuckle from some of the house members when he observed: “when congressmen ask you questions they tend to go on and on.” biggs flashed a knowing grin. donald trump’s defense attorney todd blanche on thursday pushed michael cohen, repeatedly and emphatically, on his admission that he lied when pleading guilty to some federal charges, including tax fraud, before judge william pauley. cohen   trump’s former personal lawyer and fixer, being cross examined in the ex president’s hush money trial   does not dispute the bulk of the defense’s characterizations, though he has couched some of his answers in legalistic terms. blanche appeared intent on connecting the words “lie” and “lying” to cohen as often as possible. in one exchange, blanche asked cohen if he agreed “that when you plead guilty to a crime and you’re lying, that’s not accepting responsibility for your conduct?” after cohen expressed ambivalence, blanche continued, “you lied, you lied to the judge when you pleaded guilty,” adding: “do you think judge pauley would have liked to know that you lied to him?” cohen initially said he wasn’t sure, before conceding the point. “i am certain he would have,” he said. the court soon after broke for its morning recess. trump, who had been sitting placidly with his arms folded across his chest, flashed a thumbs up as he left the courtroom after a reporter asked, “how’s todd doing?” donald trump’s defense attorney todd blanche cut off the ex president’s former lawyer michael cohen on thursday as he attempted to explain why he pleaded guilty to certain offenses he didn’t think he should’ve been charged with. “i took the global plea that was provided to me,” cohen said as he was cross examined at trump’s hush money trial. “sir, please don’t make a speech,” blanche interjected. judge juan merchan then instructed cohen to answer blanche’s questions and avoid tangential answers. in a lightning round of questions and answers, blanche pointed out that cohen has, over time, blamed various other people for his problems, including his accountant, a bank, federal prosecutors and a federal judge. and, blanche asked, “you blamed president trump?” “yes, sir,” cohen replied. donald trump’s former lawyer michael cohen explained thursday at the ex president’s hush money trial his own role in new york city’s taxi medallion system, the unusual and archaic economic model that underpins the city’s for hire vehicle industry. cohen owned 32 medallions of an estimated 13,000 citywide that he leased out to evgeny freidman, a figure known locally as new york’s “taxi king.” cohen pleaded guilty to federal charges that included hiding more than $1.3 million in income that he received from freidman. freidman was later sentenced to probation for tax fraud. “it would be no different than if you were leasing an apartment from somebody,” cohen said of his relationship with freidman. “he would lease my medallion or medallions in agreement with the contract, and he would pay me a sum every month whether he made money or not.” donald trump’s defense attorney todd blanche grilled michael cohen on thursday at the former president’s hush money trial about cohen’s 2018 guilty plea to federal charges, including for lying to congress about a trump tower moscow project. as he did when pleading guilty, cohen, trump’s former lawyer and fixer, conceded on the witness stand that he lied to two congressional committees about his contacts with russian officials. he also said he lied when he said he never agreed to travel to russia in connection with the project and never discussed with trump plans to travel to moscow to support it. watch: what does michael cohen’s guilty plea mean for trump? “just related to that issue, you lied under oath, correct?” blanche asked. “yes sir,” cohen said. blanche dug at cohen’s motivations for the admitting to prior lies to congress. blanche noted that cohen has repeatedly said he lied out of loyalty to trump. cohen went on to testify that he does accept responsibility for what he did. donald trump’s attorneys in his hush money trial gave jurors a picture thursday of his former lawyer michael cohen’s on air persona, playing two clips of his podcasts over the years in which he discussed trump and the potential charges. in the recordings played in the courtroom, cohen’s voice was louder, high pitched and much more animated than the reserved and concise way he’s been answering questions. in one clip from an episode defense lawyer todd blanche said was from october 2020, cohen uses an expletive and says he truly hopes “that this man ends up in prison.” “it won’t bring back the year that i lost or the damage done to my family. but revenge is a dish best served cold,” cohen says in the clip. he adds: “you better believe that i want this man to go down.” blanche asked cohen if he continued to call trump various names on his podcasts and when he did interviews on cnn, and cohen said he did. “and that has continued even during this trial?” blanche asked. “correct,” cohen said. defense attorney todd blanche asked as he cross examined donald trump’s former lawyer michael cohen about tv interviews he did when news of the former president’s indictment in the hush money case emerged last year. one included a cnn hit in which he compared himself and trump to the biblical david and goliath. cohen confirmed that, in text messages not shown to jurors, an investigator with the prosecutors’ office complimented him on at least one of the interviews, though prosecutors had asked cohen to refrain from talking to the news media about the case. prosecutor susan hoffinger disrupted blanche’s efforts to get the exchanges shown to jurors or read into the record. hoffinger noted that the messages were heavily redacted, which cohen said deprived them of important context. donald trump’s hush money trial got off to a slow start thursday morning, with attorneys halting proceedings to have several sidebar conversations with the judge, including an extended discussion to start the day. judge juan merchan apologized to the jurors for the delay. the judge told them that it may be necessary to hold the trial next wednesday because of scheduling, with days off including memorial day and this friday, when trump will attend son barron’s high school graduation. the trial has been taking wednesdays off so merchan can attend to other matters. the stop and start continued as defense attorney todd blanche began cross examining former trump lawyer michael cohen and prosecutors objected to the phrasing of several questions. republican reps. lauren boebert, matt gaetz and bob good sat with trump’s son eric in the first row of the gallery, behind the former president and the defense table. rep. anna paulina luna sat in the second row. donald trump’s former lawyer and fixer michael cohen entered the courtroom in the ex president’s hush money trial carrying a bottle of water and his eyeglasses case in his left hand. he strode confidently and briskly to the witness stand, not looking in trump’s direction. trump also did not look toward cohen, instead gazing straight ahead. read more: why trump’s hush money defense depends on knocking down michael cohen’s credibility the defense’s cross examination of cohen resumed soon after. beforehand, an officer instructed lawmakers in the audience to put their cellphones away, a rule that applies to everyone in the courtroom to watch the trial. “people are going to ask about it,” the officer said, noting the big concern is people taking pictures of the proceedings, which is forbidden. donald trump returned to court thursday in his hush money trial and once again complained about it, telling reporters before entering the courtroom that “the crime is that they’re doing this case.” trump was flanked by a large group of congressional allies, including republican reps. matt gaetz of florida and bob good of virginia. trump said the members joining him are “up in arms over this.” donald trump attends his trial for allegedly covering up hush money payments on may 16, 2024. photo by angela weiss/ pool via reuters he also complained about the security presence outside the courthouse. “outside it’s like fort knox, you can’t get within three blocks of this place if you’re a civilian,” trump said, even though the area is accessible to the public. trump folded papers in his hand as he entered, followed by his lawyers, a cadre of republican lawmakers and support staff. some lawmakers who joined trump in court were forced to sit in the back row of the gallery because there wasn’t enough room in the rows reserved for the entourage. the chair of the far right house freedom caucus, rep. bob good, of virginia, appeared thursday morning with rep. matt gaetz, of florida, outside trump tower to support donald trump shortly before the indicted former president left for court. gaetz is not a member of the freedom caucus but is a top trump ally. several other republicans were expected thursday at the court. the house oversight committee, led by republicans, postponed a morning meeting until evening, as gop lawmakers made their way to new york. rep. matt gaetz, r fla., listens as donald trump speaks to the news media before his trial on may 16, 2024. photo by angela weiss/pool via reuters as part of their attack on the justice system, republicans on the panel are considering thursday a contempt of congress resolution against u.s. attorney general merrick garland in a separate matter, over their investigation of president joe biden’s handling of classified documents. the former president waved before getting into his motorcade and heading to the courthouse for the day. after months of questions about whether general election debates would happen, president joe biden and republican nominee donald trump have agreed to participate in two of them: one in june and one in september. the first debate will play out in a jam packed and unsettled political calendar, before either candidate becomes his party’s official nominee at the summer conventions. watch: democratic and gop strategists discuss what to expect from the biden trump debates the june 27 match up will come after the expected conclusion of trump’s criminal hush money trial in new york, foreign trips by biden in mid june to france and italy, and the end of the supreme court’s term. the second debate would take place before most states begin early voting   though some overseas and military ballots may already be in the mail. some of the most explosive moments in donald trump’s hush money trial have played out for most of the world to see   except for the people who are actually deciding his fate: the jury. read more: a timeline of key events in the trump hush money trial the 12 person panel is shown evidence and witness testimony so they can decide whether the former president is guilty of a scheme to buy up and bury seamy stories in an effort to illegally influence the 2016 presidential election. but it’s a highly curated experience; jurors are not getting the full picture seen by those who follow along each day. they don’t even witness trump enter or exit the courtroom. he’s already there by the time they are brought into the room, and he stays until they are dismissed. this is by design. donald trump is seeking to have new york’s highest court intervene in his fight over a gag order that has seen him fined $10,000 and threatened with jail for violating a ban on commenting about witnesses, jurors and others connected to his hush money criminal trial. the former president’s lawyers filed a notice of appeal wednesday, a day after the state’s mid level appellate court refused his request to lift or modify the restrictions. the filing was listed on a court docket, but the document itself was sealed and not available. it wasn’t until after a decade in the fold, after his family pleaded with him, after the fbi raided his office, apartment and hotel room, michael cohen testified tuesday, that he finally decided to turn on donald trump. donald trump watches as michael cohen is cross examined by defense lawyer todd blanche during trump’s criminal trial on may 14, 2024. courtroom sketch by jane rosenberg/ reuters the complicated break led to a 2018 guilty plea to federal charges involving a payment to the porn actor stormy daniels to bury her story of an alleged sexual encounter with trump and to other, unrelated crimes. and it’s that insider knowledge of shady deals that pushed manhattan prosecutors to make cohen the star witness in their case against trump about that same payment, which they say was an illegal effort to influence the 2016 presidential election. left: michael cohen testifies during former donald trump's criminal trial on may 14, 2024. courtroom sketch by jane rosenberg/ reuters by zeke miller, jill colvin, josh boak, associated press by meg kinnard, associated press by michael r. sisak, eric tucker, michelle l. price, colleen long, associated press by associated press by associated press by associated press associated press associated press support provided by: learn more thank you. please check your inbox to confirm. © 1996   2025 newshour productions llc. all rights reserved. pbs is a 501(c)(3) not for profit organization. sections about stay connected thank you. please check your inbox to confirm. learn more about friends of the news hour. support for news hour provided by

the people of the state of new york v. donald j. trump is a criminal case against donald trump, the 45th and 47th president of the united states. trump was charged with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to conceal payments made to the pornographic film actress stormy daniels as hush money to buy her silence over a sexual encounter between them; with costs related to the transaction included, the payments totaled $420,000. the manhattan district attorney (da), alvin bragg, accused trump of falsifying these business records with the intent to commit other crimes: violation of federal campaign finance limits, unlawfully influencing the 2016 u.s. presidential election, and tax fraud.[a] the indictment, the first of a former u.s. president, was approved by a manhattan grand jury on march 30, 2023. on april 3, trump traveled from his residence in florida to new york city, where he surrendered to the manhattan da's office and was arraigned the next day. trump pleaded not guilty and stated that he would continue to campaign for the 2024 presidential election, even if convicted. the trial began on april 15, 2024. on april 30, trump also became the first u.s. president to be held in criminal contempt of court, due to comments he made earlier in the month about individuals involved with the trial. the prosecution argued that trump's 2016 campaign sought to benefit from the payment of hush money to daniels through trump's former lawyer michael cohen, who was reimbursed via a false retainer agreement. the prosecution rested on may 20, 2024, after calling 20 witnesses. the defense argued that trump was unaware of any allegedly unlawful scheme, that cohen was unreliable as a witness, and that the retainer agreement between them was valid. the defense rested on may 21 after calling two witnesses. throughout proceedings, the defense also made unsuccessful requests for the case to be delayed or dismissed, for presiding judge juan merchan to recuse himself, and for removal to federal court. trump was convicted on all counts on may 30, 2024, becoming the first u.s. president to be convicted of a felony. following a series of delays and trump's 2024 presidential election victory, he was sentenced with an unconditional discharge on january 10, 2025. he is expected to appeal his conviction. in july 2006, stephanie clifford, a pornographic film actress known professionally as "stormy daniels", met donald trump at a celebrity golf tournament in nevada. at the time, trump was the host of the reality tv series the apprentice and was married to melania trump.[4] according to daniels, trump invited her to his penthouse at harrah's lake tahoe[5] where the two had sex and talked about making her a guest on the apprentice.[6][7] in 2011, daniels considered selling the story to the celebrity magazine life & style for us$15,000 as trump began exploring a potential presidential bid. his lawyer, michael cohen, threatened to sue life & style when it asked the trump organization for comment. daniels' agent, gina rodriguez, leaked the story to the gossip blog the dirty in october. the post was taken down following complaints by trump's lawyers, and daniels disputed the story's veracity.[8] cohen acknowledged during court testimony in may 2024 that he advised for the story's removal.[9] as trump's 2016 presidential campaign began, rodriguez approached multiple publications including the national enquirer and attempted to sell the story. following the publication of a controversial recording of trump and access hollywood host billy bush, the national enquirer sought to suppress the story. rather than paying daniels, the national enquirer editor in chief dylan howard negotiated a $130,000 non disclosure agreement between daniels and michael cohen. cohen attempted to find the money as the election neared and repeatedly delayed her payment. keith davidson, daniels' lawyer, canceled the deal in october 2016.[5][8] ultimately, cohen drew the money from his home equity line of credit and sent it through a shell company incorporated in delaware.[5][8] trump initially denied knowing about the check made out to daniels. in april 2018, aboard air force one, he told a reporter he did not know where cohen got the money.[10] glenn kessler of the washington post described this statement as a lie,[11] as trump had personally reimbursed cohen for the payment.[12][11][13] rudy giuliani, an attorney for trump, also refuted trump's claims in a fox news interview, saying that trump was aware of the payments.[14] trump wrote several checks totaling $420,000 to cohen. the checks reimbursed him for the non disclosure agreement and covered the costs for cohen to manipulate online polls to boost trump's status. the $180,000 paid to cohen was doubled to offset taxes, and $60,000 was added. these payments were made throughout 2017, during trump's first year of presidency.[15] the payments made to cohen were declared as a legal expense.[16] nine monthly checks from trump to cohen, dated april to december 2017, exist as evidence.[17] in january 2018, the wall street journal reported on cohen's payment to daniels.[18] cohen pleaded guilty to eight criminal counts relating to the payment as well as another payment made to karen mcdougal in august. in his admission of guilt, cohen stated that he acted "at the direction of a candidate for federal office", implicating trump.[19][20] in december 2018, cohen was sentenced to three years in prison.[21] on may 2, 2024, the daily beast broke a story that trump organization chief financial officer allen weisselberg had assisted the 2016 campaign with its finance reports.[22] following cohen's august 2018 admission of guilt, manhattan district attorney (da) cyrus vance jr. opened an investigation against the trump organization and two of its executives.[23] the office paused its inquiry when the office of the federal u.s. attorney for the southern district of new york began a separate investigation into the payments,[24] but the federal inquiry concluded without charges in july 2019.[25][b] the manhattan da's office then issued a subpoena for the trump organization in august, seeking documents relating to the payments.[27] additionally, the office subpoenaed accounting firm mazars usa, demanding eight years of trump's corporate tax returns.[28] trump's lawyers sued vance to block the subpoena, citing trump's immunity from criminal inquiries as the president of the united states.[29] in trump v. vance, the u.s. supreme court ruled 7 2 in favor of vance, allowing the subpoena to continue.[30] following the 2021 new york county district attorney election, alvin bragg succeeded vance as the manhattan da.[31] in early 2021, mark pomerantz, a manhattan prosecutor, sought to revive the case under the theory that if daniels had extorted trump, the money would be criminal proceeds, and efforts to conceal its source would constitute money laundering.[32] on further examination, pomerantz found that the money laundering statute would not apply, and colleagues were skeptical that the hush money would qualify as extortion.[32] with no path to felony charges, pomerantz abandoned the inquiry and subsequently resigned in february 2022.[32] in january 2023, the manhattan da's office impaneled a grand jury, and began presenting evidence of trump's role in the stormy daniels payment.[33] cohen met extensively with the da's office and the grand jury,[34][35][36] and by march 3, cohen had met with the da's office 18 times[37][38][39] and had given his cellphones to the da's prosecutors, who wanted evidence of communications including voice recordings of daniels' former lawyer keith davidson.[40] several other witnesses met with the da's office or the grand jury in march 2023, including kellyanne conway,[41] hope hicks, two trump organization employees, two former national enquirer executives who helped broker the hush money deal, a lawyer for daniels,[42][43] daniels herself,[44] trump aligned lawyer robert costello (who provided testimony, including emails, in which he attempted to discredit cohen's reliability),[45][46] and former national enquirer publisher david pecker.[47][48][c] as early as that february, prosecutors confirmed that they might leverage additional charges, including insurance fraud, against allen weisselberg to pressure him to testify against trump,[51] and in may, the new york times reported that they were considering perjury charges against him.[52] in march 2023, district attorney alvin bragg's office indicated that an indictment was likely.[53] by march 9, 2023, prosecutors had offered trump a chance to testify before the grand jury the following week, indicating that they were likely preparing to indict him.[54][55] around that time, trump and his spokesperson began referring to both daniels' allegation and the da's proceedings as "extortion".[56] on march 10, 2023, trump's lawyer joe tacopina asked new york city's department of investigation to review the criminal probe, asserting its "weaponization".[57] on march 13, tacopina announced that trump would not testify.[58] early the next morning, the guardian reported that trump's lawyers had argued to the da that trump should not be indicted on the basis that the payment did not draw from campaign funds and would have been made regardless of his candidacy.[59] in late march 2023, there was reporting around daniels having reportedly unsuccessfully communicated in 2018 with tacopina about possibly representing her in the scandal, for which the da could move to disqualify the lawyer due to attorney client privilege and because she reputedly disclosed confidential information to his firm.[60][61][62][63] additionally, it reemerged that, in 2018, tacopina had called the hush money payment "an illegal agreement", "a fraud", and "a potential campaign finance issue".[60] on march 18, 2023, trump claimed on his social media platform, truth social, that he was to be arrested on march 21[d][e] and that the proceedings were disinformation backed by president joe biden, calling for protests in anticipation of a possible indictment.[66][67][68][69][70] law enforcement and security agencies prepared for potential reactions to an indictment of trump that week, especially in the areas of the manhattan criminal court and trump tower, including by monitoring online threats.[69][71][72][f] new york city police began to increase security in preparation for the expected indictment on march 21, and a second time for the second expected indictment on march 30.[74] metal barriers were set up around trump tower and the district criminal court building.[75] on march 24, trump, citing his presidential prospects, insinuated that "potential death & destruction" could result from bragg's allegedly false charge.[76][g] trump has called the investigation a "witch hunt", claiming political persecution.[81] trump proponents have referred to the case as harassment, calling it a "political hack job".[82] the trial and accompanying political theatrics have been described as a "circus" by the media.[83][84][85] due to multiple investigation revivals, the case earned the moniker of "zombie case".[32][86] the manhattan grand jury voted to indict trump on march 30, 2023.[87] the indictment was filed with the new york supreme court (the ordinary trial court for felonies in the state of new york and not the final court of appeal for the state) the same day.[88] the charges were under seal until published when trump was arraigned.[89][90] the indictment charged trump with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in the first degree, in violation of new york penal law §175.10.[91][92] each count is related to a specific business document, each having a date ranging from february 14 through december 5, 2017:[93] the allegedly falsified documents are related to trump's payment to stormy daniels as hush money. the payments were listed in the business records as a legal expense payable to michael cohen, whereas the indictment alleges that they were actually to reimburse cohen for the earlier, allegedly illicit, payment to daniels.[94][95] falsifying business records in the first degree is a felony under new york state law that requires that the "intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof". this is in contrast to falsifying business records in the second degree, which is a misdemeanor that does not have that requirement.[93][94][95] the charges neither include, nor even identify, the additional crimes, constituting a relatively unusual strategy for the da:[96][93].mw parser output .templatequote{overflow:hidden;margin:1em 0;padding:0 32px}.mw parser output .templatequotecite{line height:1.5em;text align:left;margin top:0}@media(min width:500px){.mw parser output .templatequotecite{padding left:1.6em}} a new york times analysis of about 30 false business records cases brought by mr. bragg and his predecessor   based on court records, interviews and information the office provided   shows that in this respect, the case against mr. trump stands apart. in all but two of the indictments reviewed by the times, the defendant was charged with an additional crime on top of the false records charge. in later filings, bragg listed (but still did not charge) three general types of crime that trump allegedly intended to commit: violation of federal campaign finance limits, violation of state election laws by unlawfully influencing the 2016 election, and violation of state tax laws regarding the reimbursement.[97] trump could have moved to allow the jury to convict on the misdemeanor charges as a lesser included offense, but he did not.[98][99] each count for which trump was convicted could result in a prison sentence of up to four years, to be served consecutively, with a maximum sentence of 20 years.[100][93][101][102] he is permitted to assume the presidency even should he be in prison.[103] the judge may also choose to impose no prison sentence.[104] the conviction did not legally prohibit trump from continuing his campaign in the 2024 presidential election, which he won.[103] (trump had stated in an april 2023 fox news interview with tucker carlson that he would continue his candidacy even if convicted.)[105][106] trump was arraigned on april 4, 2023. a law enforcement source told reuters that police would close streets around the courthouse in advance of trump's expected appearance.[107] on april 3, trump flew from palm beach international airport into laguardia airport on his private plane, and took his motorcade to trump tower, where he stayed the night.[108][109] todd blanche, a lawyer who had defended paul manafort during his 2016 fraud trial, had recently resigned from his law firm to aid trump's case.[110] police increased security in and around manhattan ahead of the arraignment; authorities said there were no credible threats of violence or organized plans of protests.[109] eric adams, the mayor of new york city, warned protestors to be peaceful.[111] acting new york supreme court justice juan merchan is presiding over the case.[112] merchan denied a motion filed by media organizations to allow a television broadcast of the arraignment or to allow electronic devices to be used in the courtroom, but allowed five press pool still photographers.[113][114] courtroom sketch artists also documented the proceedings.[115] the courtroom's glass doors were covered as a security measure.[116] upon entering the courthouse, he was put in police custody and placed under arrest.[117][118] he was booked and fingerprinted, but he was not handcuffed, nor was a mug shot taken.[119][120] trump entered the courtroom an hour later,[121] pleading not guilty to 34 felony charges.[122] the indictment was unsealed (publicly released) shortly thereafter, charging trump with 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree as part of a "conspiracy to undermine the integrity of the 2016 election".[123][124] this marked the first indictment of a former u.s. president.[125][126][127] at the arraignment, merchan warned trump not to use social media to incite violence.[128] possible trial dates were discussed; prosecutors proposed january 2024, but trump's defense team objected, saying that the trial should be set for later in 2024.[129] immediately after the arraignment, trump returned to mar a lago and addressed a crowd of supporters in the evening.[130][108] trump made several false claims about topics such as his handling of government documents, district attorney bragg, and the trump raffensperger phone call.[131] during trump's arraignment, the court set deadlines for pre trial proceedings, including for prosecutors to provide discovery to the defense.[129] the court set a deadline of august 8, 2023, for pre trial motions to be filed.[129] as he had done in other cases, trump used "attack and delay" tactics, targeting the prosecutors and the judge while prolonging proceedings, with the aim that the case might continue into late 2024, near the presidential election.[132][133] trump's lawyers maintained that he was unaware of any allegedly unlawful schemes that his allies or associates may have engaged in.[134] on march 12, 2024, the defense team filed their strategy writing "president trump lacked the requisite intent to commit the conduct charged in the indictment because of his awareness that various lawyers were involved in the underlying conduct giving rise to the charges."[135] the defense counsel stated that they would not invoke the formal "advice of counsel" defense, but that trump would "elicit evidence concerning the presence, involvement and advice of lawyers in relevant events giving rise to the charges".[135][136][h] on september 29, 2023, trump's team submitted omnibus motions to dismiss the indictment and requesting clarification of the charges.[138] on april 27, trump's team had asked for the charges to be explained in full.[139] it was possible that the second crime(s) would eventually be specified in a bill of particulars,[140] but according to a governing appeals case from c. 1980 this is not necessary.[141] on may 16, the da's office argued that it did not need to elaborate further on the basis that trump already "has more than sufficient information to prepare his defense", while reiterating possible secondary charges.[142][143][i] trump's team was reportedly considering invoking a 2000 u.s. supreme court decision which emphasizes the importance of specifying punishable criminal charges; additionally, a 1999 decision states that "any fact ... that increases the maximum penalty for [one] crime must be charged in an indictment ... and proved".[139] on february 15, 2024, the court denied the motions to dismiss.[144][145][146] however, the court did partially grant trump's request seeking clarification of the charges. trump is not only accused of falsifying business records, but doing so with the intention to commit or conceal some other crime. holding it would be unfair to expect trump to prepare a defense to a newly raised theory mid trial, the court limited the prosecution to just three theories of "other crimes" that had already been identified during pre trial procedure.[144][147] as of trump's arraignment on april 4, 2023, it was expected that the discovery process would take several months.[148] on april 17, 2023, the da's office requested that merchan obtain further information from tacopina, including his firm's correspondence with daniels, to determine whether their history constituted a conflict of interest.[63] on september 1, merchan ruled that it did not.[149] on may 4, merchan heard arguments about the da office's request to restrict information it turns over to trump's lawyers from being shared with trump himself (at least until the trial), citing his past social media posts attacking bragg and witnesses. the defense has argued that the government should be equally restrained from discussing information publicly and that trump should be allowed to defend himself politically.[150][151] on may 8, merchan ruled in favor of the order, barring evidence from being shared on social media.[152] the judge instructed trump and his lawyers on their conduct on may 23, informing them that violations could incur a "wide range of sanctions" including being held in contempt of court.[153] on may 26, prosecutors stated that they had informed trump's lawyers that evidence in the hush money case includes various audio recordings, including one of trump and a witness. it was unclear if this was in reference to secretly recorded audio from september 2016 which cohen had previously released.[154][155][156][157] on august 3, federal judge lewis a. kaplan, who oversaw e. jean carroll's civil lawsuits against trump alleging sexual assault and defamation, ruled that carroll's lawyers could provide video of trump being deposed to manhattan prosecutors.[158] on january 15, 2024, tacopina withdrew from trump's counsel[159] and daniels said she expected to testify.[160] later in the month, the da was reportedly beginning to meet with witnesses ahead of the trial.[161] on march 18, the judge ruled that both daniels and cohen could testify, placing some restrictions on daniels (as well as karen mcdougal). the defense had requested that the two be blocked from testifying the previous month. additionally, the judge ruled that trump's access hollywood tape could not be played during the trial but that it could be discussed.[162] on april 22, merchan ruled on what prosecutors may ask trump if he testified,[163] following a pretrial sandoval hearing held on april 19.[164][165][166] on may 10, judge juan merchan suggested that allen weisselberg could be called to testify in court after the defense objected to the prosecution's plan to show the jury a $750,000 severance agreement.[167] neither the defense nor the prosecution had subpoenaed weisselberg, and there were procedural concerns about adding him to the witness list so late in the trial.[167] furthermore, weisselberg's testimony could be in violation of the non disparagement clause of his severance agreement and he would likely invoke the fifth amendment.[168][169] justice juan merchan, who has experience with financial cases,[170] was randomly assigned to oversee the grand jury proceedings in trump's case, and continued to oversee handling of the charges approved by the grand jury.[171] on may 31, 2023, trump's lawyers filed a motion asking judge merchan to recuse himself from the case citing his daughter's position as partner and coo of authentic campaigns, a consulting firm that serviced biden's 2020 presidential campaign. the motion additionally alleged that merchan had encouraged former trump organization cfo allen weisselberg to cooperate with the prosecution against trump in a previous case he had presided over, and that merchan had made three $10 15 donations to various democratic causes.[172][173][j] on june 20, the da's office argued against the recusal request, citing trump's alleged "prolific history of baselessly accusing state and federal judges around the country of bias", saying he seemed to be trying to land a more favorable judge. prosecutors further argued that there was a lack of hard evidence that a particular trial result would aid merchan directly or greatly via his daughter's democratic work,[176] which a state ethics panel had similarly concluded in early may.[177][k] the court denied the motion on august 11, 2023.[181] on april 1, 2024, the defense asked merchan for permission to file a motion repeating their prior request that he recuse himself for what the defense said was a conflict of interest due to his daughter's democratic involvement.[182] on april 1, the new york city bar association issued a statement of "unequivocal support" for merchan's handling of the recusal concerns.[l] on april 2, prosecutors pointed out that the court and an ethics panel had already found that the political activities of a relative are not grounds for questioning a judge's impartiality.[184][m] the same day, trump posted a fox & friends clip in which co host brian kilmeade criticized the judge's daughter, although trump highlighted another commentator's statement.[187] as of april 3, trump had not deleted offending posts made prior to merchan's expanded order;[188] that night, he linked to a report by far right activist laura loomer criticizing merchan's daughter and wife.[189] on april 5, trump's campaign publicized their motion for merchan to recuse himself (dated april 3),[184] which asserts numerous counts of bias, and falsely cites the state office of court administration (oca) as saying merchan's daughter deleted her x account in april 2023, around when the judge "solicited an ethics opinion regarding recusal in a letter ... that the court declined to disclose".[190][177][191][n][o] on april 6, trump posted online that if arrested for violating the gag order, he would consider it a "great honor" to "become a modern day nelson mandela", the former south african president jailed for anti apartheid activism.[197] on april 8, trump's team asked an appeals court to delay the trial and pause the gag order while they appeal the latter; this was denied the following day.[198][199] on april 10, an appeals judge denied another defense delay request which was based on merchan having not yet ruled on the recusal motion.[200][198] on april 15, merchan denied the recusal motion.[201] on april 30, an appellate court denied requests for both a recusal and a stay of proceedings.[202] on may 4, 2023, trump's lawyers asked for the case to be moved to a federal court (though it would remain a state law prosecution conducted by the manhattan da), arguing that it involved alleged conduct somehow "performed while in office" despite the potential federal election law violations not being specified and occurring prior to trump's inauguration.[151][143][p] as proceedings continued in the new york supreme court,[203] bragg asked for the removal request to be dismissed, arguing that trump had failed to establish that he was an officer of the united states during his presidency,[204][205] to which the defense expounded its initial argument.[206][151] even if the case had been moved to federal court, new york state law would have continued to apply.[207] in a hearing on june 27, district judge alvin hellerstein opined that trump's conduct likely did not constitute presidential activity.[208] on july 19, arguing that the matter was apparently a personal "cover up of an embarrassing event", hellerstein ruled that the case should remain in state court.[209] trump appealed the decision on july 28,[210] but withdrew this on november 14.[211] on may 23, 2023, justice merchan set the trial for march 25, 2024.[212] trump's team complained that he expected to have multiple trials around that time. merchan said he would discuss rescheduling to another time.[213] at a february 15, 2024, hearing, which trump attended,[214] merchan reaffirmed the march 25 trial date.[215] in early february 2024, trump's federal election obstruction trial, originally set for early march, was postponed pending appeals, increasing the likelihood of the manhattan criminal trial taking place as planned on march 25, 2024.[216][217] on march 11, 2024, trump's lawyers requested a delay of trial until after the federal election obstruction case on the basis that it would bolster his argument of presidential immunity, as some evidence and allegedly some acts overlapped with his time in office.[218] trump's team cited, from april 2018, trump's denying knowledge of the hush money payment to reporters and tweeting in defense of cohen's credibility.[219] later on march 11, merchan pointed out that trump's team had missed the filing deadline and said either party would need his permission to file additional pretrial motions.[218] on march 3, the judge dismissed the request as untimely.[220] also on march 11, trump asked to delay trial until after the supreme court decides whether he is generally immune from prosecution in the federal charges on election obstruction. granting the motion would have delayed trial until mid summer or later, as the supreme court had already scheduled those arguments for april 25[221] and may not rule until the end of the court's term in early july.[222] merchan denied the motion on april 3,[223] saying that he doubted its "sincerity and actual purpose", given that trump made this request only two weeks before trial.[224] in march 2024, the u.s. attorney's office provided prosecutors with approximately 170,000 pages of documents, largely related to the 2017 federal probe of cohen's payment to daniels (and mostly reflecting evidence already turned over to trump's lawyers in june 2023).[225][226][227] trump's lawyers sought a delay in the trial on the basis of the newly produced records; the da's office said in court that only 300 of the documents were relevant to trump's defense.[228] on march 15, 2024, the judge delayed the start of trial until mid april.[229] on march 25, 2024, the judge set a trial date of april 15, and denied a motion by trump's team to further delay the trial.[228] on may 23, 2024, merchan denied trump's request to sanction prosecutors regarding the document release, ruling that the defense was provided sufficient time to respond.[230] on march 18, trump's team requested an additional delay on the basis that pretrial publicity and apparent anti trump bias in manhattan would prohibit a fair jury from being selected in april, although only 35% in the cited poll said they were convinced trump was guilty in the da's case specifically. trump's lawyers cited berating statements by cohen, e.g. saying he served jail time because his "lying" former boss "couldn't keep his mushroom dick in his pants". on march 25, the assistant da countered that "publicity is not likely to abate [and] the pretrial publicity has been ... exacerbated by the defendant".[231] on april 8, trump's team asked the appeals court for a delay to allow an attempt to move the trial to a different county, which was denied the same day.[198] on april 8, trump requested to postpone the trial so the court could consider a change of venue, which was denied the same day,[232] and so he could appeal the gag order, which was denied the next day.[233] on april 10, the appeals court denied trump's request to postpone trial on the basis of merchan being unqualified.[234] on april 12, merchan denied the defendant's request to delay trial on the basis of "prejudicial" media coverage.[235] on april 15, merchan said trump was "required to be here" on april 25 and "not required to be at the supreme court" that day, when it would hear arguments on his immunity claim in the federal election case.[236] merchan said he was not yet prepared to say whether trial would be held on may 17 to allow trump to attend his son barron's high school graduation, but indicated that he probably would grant him the day off if the proceedings progressed at an expected pace.[237] trump subsequently complained that he would "not be allowed" to attend the graduation, but on april 30 the judge said he would be able to do so.[238] on may 17, donald and melania trump attended their son's graduation from oxbridge academy at west palm beach, followed by a visit to lincoln reagan dinner at the 2024 annual minnesota republican convention in saint paul, minnesota.[239] in a may 2023 hearing and court filing, prosecutors expressed concern that trump would misuse evidence obtained through pretrial discovery procedure to attack people involved in the case, including witnesses.[207] justice merchan declined to issue a gag order or prohibit trump from publicly commenting about the case against him,[207] but issued a protective order setting rules for the use of social media involving elements of the case, and set a hearing (with trump to appear remotely) to explain the rules.[240][241] at trump's arraignment, on april 4, 2023, merchan instructed blanche to "speak to your client and anybody else you need to, and remind them to please refrain, please refrain from making statements that are likely to incite violence or civil unrest. please refrain from making comments or engaging in conduct that has the potential to incite violence, create civil unrest, or jeopardize the safety or well being of any individuals."[242] blanche had stated that trump was "frustrated, upset, and believes that there is a grave injustice happening with him being in this courtroom today" which merchan rebuked "i don't share your view that certain language and certain rhetoric is just by frustration."[242] merchan did not seek to impose a gag order at the time.[243] on february 26, 2024, the manhattan da asked for a gag order on trump, noting that trump has been fined $15,000 for two violations of a gag order in the civil fraud trial by disparaging the judge's law clerk on social media, and reporting that police had logged 89 threats to bragg, his family, or staff in 2023 (as opposed to a single threat in 2022).[244] on march 7, merchan ruled that the jury would be anonymous except to some involved in the trial, including trump, his lawyers, and prosecutors.[245] on march 26, merchan imposed a gag order on trump, restricting what he could say publicly about people involved in the case.[246] additionally, the judge warned the defense, under the threat of contempt, against dilatory tactics such as the late filing of pretrial motions or last minute demands, pointing out that trump had "stated publicly that the defense goal is to delay these proceedings ... past the 2024 presidential election".[247][248] on march 26, trump made online posts attacking the judge, the gag order, and merchan's daughter, the latter over an anti trump social media post created by someone impersonating her on social media.[249][250][251] the same day, merchan imposed a gag order forbidding trump to publicly comment on court staff, prosecutors, prospective jurors, or their families, or to cause others to make such statements, in a way that interferes with the case. bragg (as a public figure) and merchan (as the judge) were specifically exempted from protection.[252][253] the court also ordered trump not to comment on prospective trial witnesses concerning their potential participation in the criminal case.[254] on march 27 and 28, trump again attacked merchan's daughter on social media.[253][255] on march 29, prosecutors requested that the limits of the gag order be explicated regarding family of court staff in hopes of terminating what they considered intentionally defiant behavior by trump.[250][256] on april 1, merchan expanded the gag order to protect his and bragg's family members, saying attacks on them "serve no legitimate purpose".[257][258] he wrote that trump's continued attacks posted a "very real" threat to the integrity of proceedings and could cause those involved in the case to fear for themselves and their families, which would "undoubtedly interfere with the fair administration of justice and constitutes a direct attack on the rule of law itself".[259] on april 11, trump disparaged expected witnesses cohen and daniels on social media, referring to them as dishonest "sleaze bags".[254] on may 6, merchan found trump in contempt of court for the tenth time, but stated that he did not wish to jail trump due to the fact that trump was a former and potentially the next president.[260] contempt hearings were later held concerning numerous alleged violations of the gag order. on may 14, a new york appeals court denied trump's request to overturn the order.[261] also on may 14, united states senator tommy tuberville called the gag order "ridiculous" for stopping trump "from having a say so in his own trial"; tuberville further said that members of congress were attending the trial "to speak our piece for president trump" and "overcome this gag order", and he hoped that "more and more" members of congress would do so.[262] republican members of congress, including tuberville, jd vance, cory mills, nicole malliotakis and speaker mike johnson, have criticized witness michael cohen, while byron donalds, rick scott, vance, and johnson have criticized merchan's daughter.[263][264][265][266] new york magazine journalist andrew rice claimed that during cohen's may 13 testimony, he saw trump penning revision notes as to statements about the case from his republican allies.[267] on may 14, trump commented that "i do have a lot of surrogates, and they're speaking very beautifully."[268] on may 20, speaking outside the courtroom, trump mentioned witnesses robert costello and michael cohen.[269] on june 25, merchan lifted parts of trump's gag order, allowing him to talk about the jury and witnesses who took the stand during the trial.[270] merchan also stated that the gag order would be completely lifted following sentencing.[271] in new york, the statute of limitations is typically two years for misdemeanors and five years for felonies.[272] though falsifying business records is typically a misdemeanor, in new york, the charges are upgraded to a felony when used to commit or conceal another crime.[272] trump was charged with falsifying business records in the first degree, which is a class e felony (the least severe), whose statute of limitations is five years.[272] on march 20, 2020, in response to the covid 19 pandemic, new york governor andrew m. cuomo issued executive order no. 202.8 tolling (pausing) the statute of limitations for "any specific time limit for the commencement, filing, or service of any legal action, notice, motion, or other process or proceeding, as prescribed by the procedural laws of the state".[272] merchan ruled the tolling deadline was through may 6, 2021, thus extending the deadline for the prosecution by one year and 47 days, allowing the felony prosecution to commence within 6 years and 47 days from when the crime was committed.[272] trump's first indictment occurred on february 14, 2017, and the indictment was filed on march 3, 2023, within days of the deadline.[272] on february 14, 2024, merchan ruled that the tolled period was sufficient.[272] the new york statute of limitations provision, cpl§30.10, permits tolling of up to five years while the defendant is continuously outside the state.[272] during his presidency, trump spent the majority of his time outside new york.[272] merchan declined to address where this provision was applicable as the tolling occasioned by the governor's executive order was sufficient.[273] the trial began on april 15, 2024, with recessed wednesdays.[274] trump was required to attend every day of trial barring a court approved absence.[275] the trial was not televised.[276] initially, merchan allowed photographers to stand at the front of the room for a few minutes each morning before the trial began to take photos of trump seated. merchan withdrew this permission on may 9 after at least one photo was taken from the side of the table.[277] there are courtroom sketch artists present to capture the milieu.[278][q] on april 8, 2024, the judge gave attorneys a copy of the jury selection questionnaire,[283] with jury selection beginning on april 15[284][285] from a pool of over 500 candidates.[286] the selection of twelve jurors and six alternate jurors concluded on april 19.[287][288] the jury reportedly comprised seven men and five women, who mostly had white collar careers.[289] on april 22, opening statements began.[290] prosecutors accused trump, cohen, and pecker of campaign finance violations, alleging they coordinated payments to two women and concealed them as part of a conspiracy to influence the 2016 election.[291] the defense argued that the testimony of cohen, a convicted felon, could not be trusted; that the payments were ordinary business transactions, akin to editorial decisions made by newspapers;[292] and that in democracies it is normal for candidates to attempt to influence an election.[291] on april 15, prosecutors asked the judge to hold trump in contempt and fine him $3,000 for three alleged violations of the gag order against him;[293] prosecutors also requested to use the attacks on cohen as evidence.[294][254][295] by the morning of april 18, prosecutors alleged that trump incurred seven further violations of the order and requested that he be fined another $7,000.[293] on april 23, merchan heard arguments about whether trump had violated the earlier gag order when he made social media posts about two expected witnesses.[296] on april 30, trump became the first u.s. president ever to be held in criminal contempt of court,[297] on nine of the ten counts.[298] over the next few days, he paid a $9,000 fine.[299][300][301] on may 2, a second hearing was held to consider four further violation claims.[r] [306] on may 6, trump was found in contempt for one of those four claims (when he on april 22 commented on the jury) and was fined $1,000.[s] prosecutors called former national enquirer publisher david pecker to testify on april 22, 23, 25 and 26 as the trial's first witness, taking most of the first week of testimony.[309] on april 23, pecker testified that cohen used to feed him negative stories about trump's enemies, which pecker's staff would then "embellish" and show drafts to cohen to get his feedback before publishing them.[310] pecker also detailed how he offered to deploy the "catch and kill" scheme, stating that he offered in 2015 to suppress negative stories about trump and flag efforts by women attempting to sell stories about him.[311] on april 25, pecker testified that ami suppressed negative press about other celebrities, which was emphasized by trump's team in their cross examination.[312] additionally, he stated that he did not believe cohen was working for trump's campaign.[313] pecker discussed his relationship with trump prior to the 2016 campaign, during which he suppressed other negative stories about him.[312][276][314] pecker said his decision not to facilitate payment to daniels (because she was a porn star) led to it being done by cohen.[312] pecker testified he acted at trump's behest and intended to help him win the presidency, despite his own doubts regarding campaign finance laws.[314][315] keith davidson, a former attorney for stormy daniels and karen mcdougal, appeared on april 30 and may 2. he testified that the access hollywood tape helped influence daniels to go forward with her story.[316] according to davidson's testimony, he drafted the $130,000 hush money agreement.[317] davidson testified that he believed trump was behind the hush money talks.[318] however, he also acknowledged how cohen wired the transfer and that he also had conversations with howard as well as daniels' manager gina rodriguez regarding the deal.[319] on may 3, former white house communications director hope hicks testified. she said a wall street journal reporter asked her for comment on the alleged trump mcdougal affair, which is how she learned that ami had paid to catch and kill the story.[320] she stated that she drafted a statement to respond to the wall street journal, with cohen offering feedback, but trump overrode them by telling hicks to say that mcdougal's allegations were "totally untrue".[321][322] hicks stated that trump sought to hide news of both scandals from melania,[323][324] and after the story of the payment to daniels broke in early 2018, trump told her that cohen had voluntarily decided to pay daniels to protect him; hicks opined that this seemed out of character for cohen.[324] according to hicks, the access hollywood tape roiled the trump campaign.[324] though trump tried to minimize its significance,[325] the campaign felt the tape was a "crisis".[326] stormy daniels testified for five hours on may 7,[327] and for the earlier part of may 9.[328] she said she met trump at a celebrity golf tournament near lake tahoe, nevada, in 2006 and detailed a sexual encounter with trump in his hotel suite after he invited her to dinner.[327][329] she said she felt like she blacked out during the encounter and was traumatized by the experience.[330][329] daniels said trump offered to make her a contestant on the apprentice; she stated that he continued alluding to the idea for a time in subsequent phone conversations, in which he referred to her as "honey bunch" and asked when they could meet again.[331][329] in accepting the hush money, daniels stated that she was not motivated by money (although this appeared to be contradicted by a text message between her and her manager gina rodriguez which suggested she was willing to accept the payment).[329] she stated that she had no part in the hush money negotiations.[329] during daniels' testimony, merchan sustained many defense objections.[329] he repeatedly admonished daniels for giving answers that went beyond the scope of the question asked, and at one point interrupting daniels' testimony, stopping her from describing the sexual position she and trump used.[327][329] merchan set confines for daniels' later testimony and directed the prosecution to encourage her to give shorter answers.[329] afterward, daniels gave shorter answers and hewed closer to the question asked.[327] in its cross examination, the defense questioned daniels about her account of being traumatized by her encounter with trump, suggesting that her pornographic career would have made the event unsurprising. daniels explained that the first time she realized the meeting was intended to be sexual was upon coming out of the bathroom inside trump's hotel, finding him stripped to his boxers; she elaborated that she was "not expecting [this from] a man twice [her] age".[330] on may 13, michael cohen, trump's former "fixer" and attorney (who is considered the case's star witness), began testifying.[332] he would give 17 hours of testimony over four days.[333] on may 13, cohen acknowledged that he, trump and david pecker conspired to suppress negative stories and promote positive stories about trump during the 2016 election.[332] he said his work in this matter "was at the direction of and benefit of mr. trump", stating that "everything required mr. trump's sign off."[334] he further noted that after pecker refused to pay for the daniels story, he took over as funder of "catch and kill operations".[332] cohen said the release of the access hollywood tape was viewed as a campaign liability and that trump afterwards directed him to pay daniels to avoid "catastrophic" damage.[332][9] after trump's 2016 election victory, weisselberg and cohen discussed the reimbursement plan in trump's 26th floor office, and weisselberg coordinated the repayments to cohen.[332] a bank statement was presented, which showed the doubling of the $180,000 reimbursement $130,000 for daniels plus $50,000 for money trump owed cohen for paying tech company red finch so that cohen would receive the full amount after paying 50% in taxes, plus a $60,000 year end bonus, totaling $420,000. cohen said it occurred to him that weisselberg and trump had planned this reimbursement scheme in advance and that weisselberg had said in trump's presence that the monthly payments would function in the guise of a retainer agreement.[335][336] cohen testified that he aspired to be a personal lawyer to the president but that trump, instead of granting him this role, significantly cut his 2016 bonus. cohen said his relationship with trump was falling apart at this time. he said his work for trump boosted his personal career, including by securing more prominent clients.[332] cohen also testified that he decided to stop lying for trump following a meeting he had with his family shortly before his 2018 guilty plea.[337] before the day concluded, cohen began defense cross examination.[337] on may 16, a trump lawyer accused cohen of lying that on october 26, 2016, he was on the phone with trump's personal bodyguard, keith schiller, and had him hand the phone to trump, who then approved the hush money deal. the defense cited phone records as showing that a series of prank calls to cohen had prompted him to contact schiller for a call lasting one minute and 36 seconds, which cohen defended as enough time to handle both matters.[338] on may 20, during cross examination, cohen confirmed that around october 26, 2016, he helped tiffany trump regarding an extortion issue she faced.[339] cohen made two brief calls to donald trump on the morning of october 26,[340] which he said were about daniels.[341] cohen confirmed that he lied to weisselberg about how much he had paid red finch, and that his false reimbursement request amounted to theft from the organization.[342][343][344][345] he said he lied in 2018 when he said that trump had been unaware of the daniels payment.[346] he said he had no income between his 2018 guilty plea[347] and the publication of his 2020 memoir,[348] but that since then he had earned $4.4 million from podcasts and books.[349] asked whether he has a "financial interest in the outcome of this case", cohen said he expected to make more money if trump was found not guilty, since "it gives me more to talk about".[350][351] he acknowledged that his name recognition comes from his frequent criticism of trump and that he was even interested in running for congress.[344] defense cross examination of cohen concluded on may 20.[352][335] the defense began its case on may 20, 2024, and rested its case on may 21 after calling two witnesses.[333][353] trump did not testify.[354][355] on may 20, robert costello testified.[356] merchan admonished the witness for making comments on the stand objecting to rulings, staring at the judge, and rolling his eyes.[357] on may 21, costello was cross examined by the prosecution.[358] in a may 2018 email to citron, costello said it was a goal to get cohen "on the right page without giving him the appearance that we are following instructions from giuliani or the president" and said he believed it was "the clear and correct strategy".[358][359] when asked if "the email speaks for itself" as he had asserted the day before, costello said "sometimes."[358] the defense rested its case thereafter.[358] on may 28, the defense gave a three hour closing argument including breaks.[360] trump lawyer todd blanche claimed trump had nothing to do with checks which were written by trump's sons, donald trump jr. and eric trump.[361] blanche questioned why prosecutors did not call donald jr. and eric as witnesses despite their signing payment checks to cohen.[361] blanche also showed an email revealing that mcconnery sought approval from both donald jr. and eric.[361] blanche alleged that it was cohen's decision to make the hush money payment and variously branded him a prolific liar.[361] blanche sought to discredit daniels' ambitions, noting (among other things) text messages between her manager and publicist gina rodriguez and dylan howard which showed that howard believed pecker would pay for her story shortly after the access hollywood tape was released.[361] merchan admonished blanche for telling the jury: "you cannot send someone to prison, you cannot convict somebody, based upon the words of michael cohen." merchan said this type of comment is "highly inappropriate" and "not allowed",[362] as the jury is instructed not to consider how merchan might sentence trump.[363][364][365] the same day, the prosecution gave a four hour and 41 minute closing argument including breaks.[361] prosecutor joshua steinglass described pecker's testimony as "utterly damning".[361] steinglass noted that some key parts of daniels' story were proven true[361] and noted that the defense appeared to acknowledge that trump knew about the daniels payment as early as 2017.[361] steinglass stated that it made sense that cohen was interested in the outcome of the case, noting that trump dropped him "like a hot potato" when their relationship soured.[366] steinglass went over phone conversations between trump and cohen regarding the hush money payment and showed a december 2017 check to cohen signed via sharpie by donald trump,[361] arguing that the latter must have known the purpose of such checks, as his "entire business philosophy was and is to be involved in everything".[367] steinglass further stated that the payment was made to "hoodwink the american voter".[361][368] at the end of closing arguments, merchan said that jury instructions would be read on may 29 and were expected to last an hour.[361] on may 29, the jury began deliberations.[369] on may 30 at 5:07 pm edt, trump was found guilty on all 34 counts,[1][370] making him the first former u.s. president to be convicted of a felony.[371] trump had turned over two of the three pistols he was licensed for to the new york police department (nypd) on march 31, 2023, with a third pistol moved to florida.[372] trump's new york state concealed carry license was suspended on april 1, 2023, following his indictment on criminal charges.[373] new york state law and federal law prohibit people with felony convictions from possessing firearms, and federal law even prohibits people under indictment or information for a felony (but not convicted) from possessing firearms, a violation of which can result in up to 15 years imprisonment, or life imprisonment if one is subject to the enhanced penalties imposed by the armed career criminal act.[374] [375] as of june 5, 2024, trump's new york firearm license was expected to be revoked after the nypd's legal bureau completes its investigation.[376] as of june 10, trump was reportedly still in possession of the third firearm in florida.[377][378] on june 10, 2024, trump and his lawyer todd blanche attended his probation interview via videoconference.[379][t] if placed on probation, trump cannot associate with other convicted felons.[380][384] on june 28, 2024, the new jersey division of alcoholic beverage control declined to renew the liquor licenses for trump national golf club in bedminster and colts neck, instead issuing temporary permits.[385] the alcohol laws of new jersey prohibit a liquor license from being issued to "any person who has been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude", typically involving a serious crime involving "dishonesty, fraud or depravity".[385][386][387] though the trump organization has stated that trump is not connected with the liquor licenses, the new jersey attorney general pointed out that trump is the sole beneficiary of his revocable trust, which owns the licenses.[385][388] a hearing for the licenses was expected to be held on july 19, but was delayed until after trump's sentencing.[389][385] the u.s. constitution does not bar individuals with criminal records from the presidency,[390] but the fourteenth amendment implies that crime beyond insurrection (as congress could separately argue) may be cited as grounds for felony disenfranchisement (the rescinding of one's right to vote). in a 1974 case, such disenfranchisement was upheld as a state right.[391] felons in new york are required to surrender a dna sample.[392][393][u] on may 31, 2024, the day after the trial ended, trump told reporters he wanted to have the "nasty gag order" lifted.[395] on june 4, blanche filed a motion to have the gag order lifted, stating: "now that the trial is concluded, the concerns articulated by the government and the court do not justify restrictions on the first amendment rights of president trump."[396] on june 5, matthew colangelo asked that the gag order remain in place "to protect the integrity of these proceedings and the fair administration of justice at least through the sentencing hearing and the resolution of any post trial motions".[397] many expected trump, had the gag order been lifted, to assail trial participants including the witnesses, jury, and court staff, as well as their families.[398][399] on june 18, 2024, the new york court of appeals said it would not hear an earlier appeal by trump on the gag order, leaving it in place.[400] on june 25, two days before the first 2024 u.s. presidential debate, merchan partially lifted the gag order permitting trump to comment on witnesses and jurors, but trump cannot reveal the jurors' identities, nor comment about court staffers, the prosecution team or their families until after sentencing.[401][402][403] in july 2024, missouri attorney general andrew bailey filed a lawsuit against new york state in an attempt to invoke the u.s. supreme court's exclusive jurisdiction to hear disputes between two states.[404] the lawsuit sought to block trump's gag order and sentencing until after the election, accusing new york of interfering with the election in missouri and violating missourians' first amendment rights.[404] on august 5, the supreme court ruled against intervening.[405] on december 17, 2024, trump excoriated merchan on truth social, stating that the judge "has so little respect for the constitution that he is keeping in place an illegal gag order on me ... just so i cannot expose his and his family's disqualifying and illegal conflicts".[406] on january 3, 2025, in a ruling upholding the conviction, merchan stated that trump had "gone to great lengths to broadcast ... his lack of respect for judges, juries ... and the justice system as a whole". this prompted trump to write online that "'acting' justice merchan, who is a radical partisan, just issued another order that is knowingly unlawful," asserting that the ruling violated the constitution and compromised the executive office's integrity.[407] district judge alvin hellerstein rejected defense arguments regarding presidential immunity in july 2023, when trump attempted to remove the case to federal court, ruling that "the matter was purely a personal item of the president."[408][409] on july 1, 2024, the u.s. supreme court ruled in trump v. united states, supporting presidential immunity for official acts committed by the seated president. later that day, trump's counsel requested permission to move to dismiss the conviction on the basis that some evidence presented in the trial constituted official actions by trump.[218][410] this includes 2018 social media posts by trump, phone records between trump and cohen, a government ethics disclosure referencing the hush money payment, and some of hicks' and westerhout's testimony.[411][412][413] trump's motion was formally made on july 11.[413] merchan's ruling will center on whether the evidence presented constituted official actions, and whether it influenced the verdict.[411] if the conviction is overturned, prosecutors would need to convene another grand jury to issue a new indictment.[413] merchan's ruling on immunity was initially expected by september 6, 2024. it was postponed so he could consider trump's third recusal motion, which he denied on august 13.[414] the immunity ruling was expected by september 16.[415][416] on september 3, 2024, hours before hellerstein rejected trump's request to remove his case to federal court, prosecutors urged merchan to rule swiftly on the immunity question, expressing concern that hellerstein might pause state court proceedings.[417] on september 6, merchan postponed the immunity ruling to november 12.[418] on that day, merchan agreed to a request from prosecutors to pause the case for a week while they considered how trump's election could impact proceedings.[419][420] on november 19, the manhattan da argued that the conviction should stand because no law states that temporary presidential immunity nullifies proceedings conducted during the president's time outside of office and regarding activities deemed unofficial to that post.[421] on december 16, merchan ruled that the supreme court decision had no effect on trump's conviction. merchan stated that trump's conduct pertains to personal acts and that any disputed evidence was "harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt".[422][423] in 2023, trump attempted to remove the case to federal court, in response to which judge hellerstein ruled that "the matter was purely a personal item of the president."[408][409] on august 29, 2024, trump's lawyers asked the federal court for the southern district of new york to seize control of the case.[424] on september 3, judge hellerstein rejected trump's request on the basis that the payments were an unofficial act.[425][426] hours later, trump's attorneys filed a notice of appeal to the second circuit court of appeals.[427] on october 14, trump's counsel asked the second circuit to reconsider hellerstein's rejection, arguing that it was based upon "profoundly flawed analysis" and continuing to assert that instead of being personally prosecuted, trump was being politically persecuted.[426] on december 2, 2024, the defense asked for the case to be dismissed, arguing that it was invalid due to trump's 2024 election.[428] on december 9, the prosecution asked the court to deny the request on the bases that the trial had already concluded, the immunity question had yet to be ruled on and "president elect immunity does not exist."[429][430] on these lines, the prosecution suggested that sentencing could take place before the presidency without an incarceratory penalty, or more novelly that the sentencing could be vacated, but not trump's guilty status.[431] trump's lawyers lambasted the latter suggestion as irresponsible because of its typical use for a dead defendant and in light of assassination attempts on their client.[432] on december 3, 2024, the defense suggested that the case should be dismissed on the basis of alleged "grave juror misconduct", implying that if merchan ruled otherwise, trump's team would pursue its appeal to the second circuit regarding the denied removal request.[433][434][427] on december 5, prosecutors replied that the juror misconduct claim stemmed from "unsworn, unsupported, hearsay allegations" from a source who "has refused to endorse and has at least partially disclaimed" them.[435] on january 3, 2025, merchan upheld trump's conviction.[436][437] on january 6, trump appealed the decision.[438] the next day, a new york appeals court scheduled a january 21 hearing for the defense to make its arguments.[439] before his conviction, officials in state and federal agencies began preparing for possible incarceration.[440][441] trump's rhetoric and lack of acknowledgement of any wrongdoing was expected to negatively impact the leniency of his sentence.[442] trump's sentencing hearing was originally scheduled for july 11, 2024.[443] on july 1, trump's counsel requested to delay sentencing to consider the impact of the u.s. supreme court ruling in trump v. united states released that day.[218][410] the manhattan da's office agreed to the delay, but said the defense's position lacked merit.[444] on july 2, merchan postponed the sentencing hearing to september 18.[445] in august, trump's team asked merchan to again postpone the sentencing hearing until after the election,[446] and the manhattan da stated that it would defer to merchan on this matter.[447] on august 29 (in a request to the u.s. district court for the southern district of new york to seize control of the case), trump's lawyers complained that a september sentencing date would amount to election interference.[424] on september 6, merchan postponed the sentencing hearing to november 26.[418][448] at the presidential immunity hearing on november 19, the manhattan da's office said it would consent to postpone sentencing until trump leaves office.[421] three days later, merchan canceled the sentencing date,[449] but on january 3, 2025, set a new sentencing hearing for january 10,[450] four days after the electoral college vote count and ten days before trump's second inauguration is scheduled.[437] on january 6, trump asked merchan for a delay while new appeals played out. merchan denied the request the same day, deciding that the defense's reasoning largely repeated past arguments.[438][451] on january 7, the new york supreme court, appellate division denied trump's request to postpone sentencing while he appeals merchan's immunity ruling.[439] on january 8, trump's lawyers asked both the u.s. supreme court and the new york court of appeals to stay sentencing, arguing that the case was entirely political.[452][453] on january 9, the new york court of appeals said it would not block the sentencing,[454] and the supreme court denied trump's request to postpone sentencing in a 5 4 decision. chief justice john roberts and amy coney barrett joined the three liberal judges in denying trump a stay.[455] merchan ruled that trump could choose to attend his january 10 sentencing by videoconference. stating that it would be impractical to incarcerate the president elect, merchan suggested that he would most likely issue an unconditional discharge, upholding charges but issuing no fine, probation, or jail time.[450][436][437] trump opted to attend the sentencing by videoconference. on january 10, merchan issued an unconditional discharge.[456] trump has a right to one level of appeal for the conviction.[457][354] on january 29, 2025, trump filed a notice of appeal, to be heard by the new york state supreme court, appellate division, first department. he will be represented by sullivan & cromwell.[458] if unsuccessful, the next potential outlet would be the new york court of appeals, the state's highest court, which has discretion over whether to hear an appeal.[459]

wait wait... don't tell me! is npr's weekly quiz program. each week on the radio you can test your knowledge against some of the best and brightest in the news and entertainment world while figuring out what's real news and what's made up. here's what to know about the indictment and the case. former president donald trump speaks with reporters while in flight on his plane after a campaign rally in waco, texas, saturday, march 25, 2023. (ap photo/evan vucci) donald trump has become the first former u.s. president to be charged with a crime, the culmination of a political rise defined by unprecedented scandal. the vote of a manhattan grand jury to indict the republican former president on charges related to hush money payments made on his behalf during his 2016 presidential campaign catapults the now candidate trump into a new era of legal risk and complicates his attempts to return to the white house. here’s what to know about the indictment and the case: trump now faces threats to his freedom after decades of legal investigations that have never resulted in serious consequences. the manhattan district attorney’s office said thursday that prosecutors had reached out to trump’s lawyers to arrange for him to surrender, which could happen early next week. trump is expected to appear at the prosecutor’s office to be processed and fingerprinted and have a mug shot taken. he is also expected to appear in court, when a judge would list the charges and trump would enter a plea. he will have to contend with a criminal case while running again for the white house, taking time and attention away from the campaign trail   though neither the case nor a conviction would preclude him from seeking or winning the presidency in 2024. the indictment comes as he is facing several other investigations that could lead to legal problems for the former president. those pending cases, along with a civil trial that’s scheduled to start in new york next month over a columnist’s claims that trump raped her in the 1990s, add to an ever growing cloud of scandals surrounding him. the grand jury in manhattan had been probing hush money payments at the height of the 2016 presidential campaign to two women who alleged sexual encounters with the former president. trump’s former lawyer michael cohen, one of the witnesses who testified, says he orchestrated payments totaling $280,000 to porn actor stormy daniels and former playboy model karen mcdougal. cohen pleaded guilty in 2018 to violating federal campaign finance law in connection with the payments. federal prosecutors said the payments amounted to illegal, unreported assistance to trump’s campaign. but they declined to file charges against trump himself. the manhattan district attorney’s office appeared to be investigating whether anyone committed crimes in arranging the payments, or in the way they accounted for them internally at the trump organization. but the specific charges remained under seal late thursday. donald trump indicted; expected to surrender next week the charges center on payments made during the 2016 presidential campaign to silence claims of an extramarital sexual encounter. 2 years ago trump, who denies the sexual encounters, called the indictment “political persecution” and an attempt to interfere in his presidential campaign. calling himself “a completely innocent person,” he cast the indictment as the latest in a line of actions that he says are designed to “destroy” his make america great again movement, including his two presidential impeachments and the fbi search of his home that turned up classified documents. “the democrats have lied, cheated and stolen in their obsession with trying to ‘get trump,’” he said in a statement. earlier this month, trump said his arrest was imminent and called on his supporters to protest. last week, he warned about “potential death and destruction” if he were charged. his words evoked his comments ahead of the violent jan. 6, 2021 insurrection at the u.s. capitol. trump did not repeat his call to protest thursday, but police forces around the country are on guard for potential unrest. beyond the manhattan case, trump is facing an array of other investigations. on the federal level, the justice department is investigating the retention of top secret government documents at his florida estate, mar a lago, and efforts by trump and his allies to overturn the results of the 2020 election. the efforts by many of the same players in the latter case were also the subject of a special grand jury investigation in georgia. the panel’s foreperson said the special grand jury recommended multiple criminal indictments, leaving it up to fulton county district attorney fani willis, a democrat, to decide whether to convene a regular grand jury and pursue criminal charges. with many serious cases looming around the other investigations, some legal experts have questioned the wisdom of the manhattan case becoming the first to result in charges. trump has said the charges would actually help him in the 2024 presidential race and has tried to use the case to galvanize support. last weekend, at the first rally of the campaign, he cast the manhattan investigation and the other probes as the latest in a long line of political attacks against him. his campaign handed out signs that said “witch hunt” as trump told his supporters that the legal challenges were also an attack on his followers and his political movement. some republican and independent voters could see the case, at the very least, as another example of problematic baggage that has followed trump for years and has been a distraction. the news was expected to only fortify existing democratic opposition to trump. republicans who are running against trump or who are considering their own campaigns were quick to rally to criticize the case and attack manhattan district attorney alvin bragg, even if they didn’t address the underlying allegations against trump. florida gov. ron desantis, who is expected to announce a campaign and is seen as trump’s top rival for the gop nomination, called the indictment “un american.” former vice president mike pence, also considering a challenge to trump in 2024, called the indictment “an outrage.” trump indictment throws 2024 race into uncharted territory the indictment raises profound questions for the gop's future, particularly as trump faces the possibility of additional charges soon in atlanta and washington. 2 years ago republicans framed the arrest as a political prosecution by a rogue democratic district attorney who they said was weaponizing the criminal justice system. house speaker kevin mccarthy, r calif., said the house “will hold alvin bragg and his unprecedented abuse of power to account.” some of trump’s fiercest supporters came to his defense. rep. marjorie taylor greene of georgia and former arizona gubernatorial candidate kari lake, two names floated as potential trump running mates, said he’s innocent. democrats were less vocal in the hours after the indictment became known, but some of the former president’s critics have framed the case as a long overdue dose of accountability. president joe biden, who is expected to announce he’s running for reelection next year, has not commented on the indictment. the democratic national committee did not comment on the specifics of the case but sought to yoke the entire gop to trump. “no matter what happens in trump’s upcoming legal proceedings, it’s obvious the republican party remains firmly in the hold of donald trump and maga republicans,” dnc national press secretary ammar moussa said in a statement. senate majority leader chuck schumer, d n.y., said: “mr. trump is subject to the same laws as every american. he will be able to avail himself of the legal system and a jury, not politics, to determine his fate according to the facts and the law.” house minority leader hakeem jeffries, d n.y., did not immediately comment, though some lesser known house members welcomed the news. “i continue to believe that every american elected official and leader should be held fully accountable for their actions and crimes,” said rep. harley rouda of california. “finally, today, donald trump’s chickens have come home to roost,” said rep. raul grijalva, who represents a safe district in arizona. but his fellow arizonan, rep. ruben gallego, who is running for the senate, was more measured: “we should wait to hear from the grand jury before jumping to conclusions.” never miss a moment with the whyy listen app! play, pause, and rewind the live radio stream, access on demand audio features, and dive into podcasts from both local and national sources. whyy is your source for fact based, in depth journalism and information. as a nonprofit organization, we rely on financial support from readers like you. please give today. federal judge blocks elon musk’s doge from accessing sensitive u.s. treasury department material the case alleges the trump administration allowed musk’s team access to the treasury department’s central payment system in violation of federal law. 16 hours ago special counsel jack smith says evidence against trump was enough to convict him the report on federal charges against trump for election interference in 2020 offers special counsel jack smith a last chance to explain his decisions after dropping the case. 4 weeks ago donald trump indicted; expected to surrender next week the charges center on payments made during the 2016 presidential campaign to silence claims of an extramarital sexual encounter. 2 years ago 10 hours ago 12 hours ago 16 hours ago want a digest of whyy’s programs, events & stories? sign up for our weekly newsletter. together we can reach 100% of whyy’s fiscal year goal whyy provides trustworthy, fact based, local news and information and world class entertainment to everyone in our community. whyy offers a voice to those not heard, a platform to share everyone’s stories, a foundation to empower early and lifelong learners and a trusted space for unbiased news. learn more about social responsibility at whyy. it’s how we live. 215.351.1200 talkback@whyy.org 302.516.7506 talkback@whyy.org © mmxxv whyy whyy is partnered with

wait wait... don't tell me! is npr's weekly quiz program. each week on the radio you can test your knowledge against some of the best and brightest in the news and entertainment world while figuring out what's real news and what's made up. the office called the effort an “unprecedented inquiry” into an ongoing probe. manhattan district attorney alvin bragg arrives at his office, thursday, march 23, 2023, in new york. (ap photo/mary altaffer) the manhattan district attorney investigating donald trump rebuffed house republicans’ request thursday for documents and testimony about the case, dismissing it as an “unprecedented inquiry” with no legitimate basis. in a letter obtained by the associated press, the general counsel for manhattan district attorney alvin bragg slammed the congressional request as “an unlawful incursion into new york’s sovereignty.” “the letter only came after donald trump created a false expectation that he would be arrested the next day and his lawyers reportedly urged you to intervene,” leslie dubeck wrote in the letter. “neither fact is a legitimate basis for congressional inquiry.” fox, dominion argue over legal standards to prove defamation fox contends that it can't be held liable for defamation for simply reporting on newsworthy allegations   a sitting president’s claim that the election was being stolen. 2 years ago the republican chairmen of three house committees on monday sent a letter to bragg seeking information about his actions in the trump case. the republicans criticized the grand jury investigation as an “unprecedented abuse of prosecutorial authority.” the chairmen requested testimony as well as documents and copies of any communications with the justice department to be turned over by thursday. the request came as republicans in the house quickly rallied around the former president as a grand jury in new york weighs whether to bring an indictment against him. “if a grand jury brings charges against donald trump, the da’s office will have an obligation, as in every case, to provide a significant amount of discovery from its files to the defendant so that he may prepare a defense,” dubeck wrote. the five page response from bragg’s office provides a rare insight into what has remained a secret grand jury process, marking one of the first public acknowledgments that there is a sitting grand jury currently investigating trump. the da’s office has adhered closely to centuries old rules that have kept grand juries under wraps to protect the reputations of people who end up not being charged and to encourage reluctant witnesses to testify. in proceedings closed to the public and members of the media, grand jurors listen to evidence presented by prosecutors and hear from witnesses. there is no judge present nor anyone representing the accused, and prosecutors do not have to offer any evidence favorable to the defense. it’s not just stormy daniels. here are ongoing criminal investigations trump faces the former president also faces scrutiny in other probes that could come with potential charges. 2 years ago the disclosure comes as the grand jury appears close to finishing its work, after hearing last week from trump’s former lawyer and fixer michael cohen, but the timing of a possible decision on whether to charge the ex president remains uncertain. prosecutors canceled a scheduled grand jury session wednesday and planned to hear testimony on other matters thursday, according to a person familiar with the matter. but law enforcement in new york has been making preparations for any unrest, should trump face charges. the case revolves around hush money payments during trump’s 2016 presidential campaign to women who alleged sexual encounters with him. bragg’s team appears to be looking at whether trump or anyone committed crimes in new york state in arranging the payments, or in the way they accounted for them internally at the trump organization. on thursday, one of the gop chairmen, rep. jim jordan, r ohio, expanded his probe into the handling of the trump case by demanding testimony and documents from mark pomerantz and carey dunne, two former manhattan prosecutors who had been leading the trump case before quitting last year in a clash over the direction of the probe. “last year, you resigned from the office over bragg’s initial reluctance to move forward with charges, shaming bragg in your resignation letter   which was subsequently leaked   into bringing charges,” jordan, an ohio republican, wrote in the letter to pomerantz late wednesday. “it now appears that your efforts to shame bragg have worked as he is reportedly resurrecting a so called ‘zombie’ case against president trump using a tenuous and untested legal theory.” requests for comment from pomerantz and dunne were not returned. ___ associated press writer michael r. sisak in new york contributed to this report. never miss a moment with the whyy listen app! play, pause, and rewind the live radio stream, access on demand audio features, and dive into podcasts from both local and national sources. whyy is your source for fact based, in depth journalism and information. as a nonprofit organization, we rely on financial support from readers like you. please give today. judge rejects bid by donald trump to throw out classified documents case on constitutional grounds district judge cannon said that though the trump team had raised “various arguments warranting serious consideration,” a dismissal of charges was not merited. 11 months ago prosecutors say they’re open to delaying start of donald trump’s march 25 hush money trial trump’s lawyers are seeking an 90 day delay or the dismissal of charges against trump, alleging violations of what’s known as the discovery process. 11 months ago judge overseeing georgia election interference case dismisses some charges against trump the order leaves intact many other charges in the indictment. the judge wrote that prosecutors could seek a new indictment on the charges he dismissed. 11 months ago 10 hours ago 12 hours ago 16 hours ago want a digest of whyy’s programs, events & stories? sign up for our weekly newsletter. together we can reach 100% of whyy’s fiscal year goal whyy provides trustworthy, fact based, local news and information and world class entertainment to everyone in our community. whyy offers a voice to those not heard, a platform to share everyone’s stories, a foundation to empower early and lifelong learners and a trusted space for unbiased news. learn more about social responsibility at whyy. it’s how we live. 215.351.1200 talkback@whyy.org 302.516.7506 talkback@whyy.org © mmxxv whyy whyy is partnered with

our live coverage has ended. follow the latest us political news here or read through the updates below. tuesday’s arraignment of former president donald trump was a whirlwind of historic firsts. now the wait begins for the long slog of the judicial system to play out, with the next scheduled actions in court months away. away from the courthouse, however, trump quickly went back to attacking manhattan district attorney alvin bragg and new york judge juan merchan, along with their families   raising questions about whether his rhetoric could land him in hot water legally. here’s what’s next in trump’s new york criminal case: during tuesday’s arraignment, prosecutors said they were negotiating the logistics of a “protective order” with trump’s defense team, which would limit how trump and his attorneys can use the documents they will be given from the grand jury proceedings during the discovery process. prosecutors specifically said they want to prohibit trump from posting any discovery materials to social media or sharing them with third parties, such as journalists. they also said they plan to allow trump to review certain sensitive materials only with his lawyers. trump’s attorneys will have to agree to the specifics of the agreement, but the exchanges showed the concern in the district attorney’s office about what trump might say or post about the evidence they hand over. “the entirety of the prosecution’s case file will soon have to be turned over to the defense,” agnifilo said. “prosecutors don’t want it made public because they’re focused on the proceedings and know trump will try this in the court of public opinion way before any trial in a court. that’s where the integrity of the proceedings can get really dicey   and that’s what they’re trying to accomplish with a protective order.” when could a trial actually start? if the case goes to trial, it’s not going to be until next year   when trump could be in the thick of the 2024 republican presidential primary. merchan set an august 8 deadline for trump’s lawyers to file motions in the case   such as an attempt to get the charges dismissed or reduced to misdemeanors. prosecutors will have until september 19 to respond, and then merchan expects to rule on the motions at the december hearing. the next hearing date for the case is december 4. prosecutors asked merchan to plan on a trial beginning in january 2024, but trump’s attorneys suggested that the spring might be more realistic, given they had not yet received any documents in the case. merchan seemed to side with trump’s lawyers. “i understand what you are saying,” merchan said. “i think that is reasonable. you have not received discovery. it is difficult to anticipate if you will be ready for trial in january of 2024. the message i would like to deliver is we would like to move ahead as expeditiously as possible, without undue delay.” read more. the former trump world tower doorman referenced in case documents accompanying former president donald trump’s unsealed indictment told cnn wednesday he was in “complete shock” to learn of his involvement in the charges brought against trump. “i was in complete shock when i was informed by my attorney that i was cited in the statement of facts related to former president trump’s indictment as i was not given any forewarning that i would be included,” dino sajudin said. “i was never asked to appear before the grand jury, nor was i ever interviewed by the district attorney’s office.” the comments made to cnn mark sajudin’s first statement to the media since the unsealing of trump’s indictment tuesday. according to the statement of facts that accompanied the indictment, ami   the publisher of national inquirer   sought to silence a former trump world tower doorman who claimed to have knowledge about an alleged affair between trump and an ex housekeeper. “ami negotiated and signed an agreement to pay the doorman $30,000 to acquire exclusive rights to the story,” the statement of facts read. ami purchased the information from the doorman “without fully investigating his claims,” and at a later date “concluded that the story was not true,” it said. while “the doorman” is not named in the documents, sajudin told cnn in april 2018: “i can confirm that while working at trump world tower i was instructed not to criticize president trump’s former housekeeper due to a prior relationship she had with president trump which produced a child.” his suggestion that trump had fathered a child out of wedlock with an ex housekeeper was not verified by cnn. cnn reported later in 2018 that sajudin had been released from his contract with ami. a copy of the signed “source agreement” obtained at the time appeared to have been signed in november 2015, and stated that ami had exclusive rights to sajudin’s story “regarding donald trump’s illegitimate child.” former president donald trump thanked the court staff and police officers involved in his arraignment in manhattan tuesday. “court attendants, police officers, and others were all very professional, and represented new york city sooo well. thank you to all,” trump said in a statement the day after his arraignment. trump pleaded not guilty to 34 felony criminal charges of falsifying business records in a historic and unprecedented court appearance tuesday. prosecutors allege trump sought to undermine the integrity of the 2016 election through a hush money scheme with payments made to women who claimed they had extramarital affairs with trump. several republican lawmakers, both allies and critics of former president donald trump, issued statements following the former president’s arraignment on tuesday. trump pleaded not guilty in a manhattan court to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in the first degree after hearing charges against him stemming from a hush money payment to an adult film actress in 2016. here’s how lawmakers are reacting: house speaker kevin mccarthy accused manhattan district attorney alvin bragg of seeking to interfere in the elections and said congress will hold him accountable. “alvin bragg is attempting to interfere in our democratic process by invoking federal law to bring politicized charges against president trump, admittedly using federal funds, while at the same time arguing that the peoples’ representatives in congress lack jurisdiction to investigate this farce. not so. bragg’s weaponization of the federal justice process will be held accountable by congress,” mccarthy tweeted. senate minority leader mitch mcconnell has not spoken out. gop sen. mitt romney, a sharp trump critic, criticized what he called bragg’s overreach, saying it sets a “dangerous precedent.” “i believe president trump’s character and conduct make him unfit for office,” romney said in a statement. “even so, i believe the new york prosecutor has stretched to reach felony criminal charges in order to fit a political agenda. no one is above the law, not even former presidents, but everyone is entitled to equal treatment under the law. the prosecutor’s overreach sets a dangerous precedent for criminalizing political opponents and damages the public’s faith in our justice system.” house gop chair elise stefanik, a key trump ally, called trump’s arrest “shameful,” adding that it would help him in his bid for the white house. “president trump continues to skyrocket in the polls, and just like with the russia hoax and both sham impeachments, president trump will defeat the latest witch hunt, defeat joe biden, and will be sworn in as president of the united states in january 2025,” she said in a statement. house judiciary chair jim jordan tweeted tuesday, “equal justice under the law, unless you’re a republican running for president,” after trump was arraigned. when asked on fox news on wednesday if he will subpoena bragg, jordan said that some lawmakers do want to talk to the district attorney. “he’s asked what questions we have,” jordan said, referring to the correspondence he has had with bragg’s office so far. “so i think he’s almost conceding the point that we should be able to talk to him. everything is on the table. we are going to figure out how we proceed next. but we do want some answers to some key questions.” house majority leader steve scalise retweeted jordan’s post. house oversight committee chairman james comer said that he will have a call with mccarthy and jordan “this week” to discuss how to move forward with their investigation bragg. “and we are going to try to figure out a path moving forward. this is very serious,” comer told fox and friends on wednesday, “we are not going to stop on this. nothing changed. we believe he has overstepped.” trump ally sen. marsha blackburn accused bragg of being politically motivated in his investigation in a number of tweets. in one post, blackburn called bragg a “radical left wing activist abusing his power in an attempt to help biden remain in office.” gop sen. jd vance tweeted that “bragg’s entire career is about normalizing violent crime. just crazy that he’s bringing this weak case in the middle of a presidential election.” the ohio senator, who was once a trump critic, has embraced trump and already endorsed him in the 2024 presidential race. gop sen. tim scott of south carolina, who is weighing a 2024 presidential run, slammed bragg ahead of the indictment, saying that he “doesn’t prosecute criminals, yet weaponizes the law against his political enemies.” gop rep. nancy mace, whose primary opponent former president trump endorsed last cycle, tweeted that his indictment is “bs” and “clearly political prosecution.” senate minority whip john thune aligned himself with other gop lawmakers who call bragg’s case politically motivated. “this indictment looks like a political agenda run amok, and it’s becoming increasingly clear why previous district attorneys opted against prosecution,” thune said in a statement. former president donald trump is involved in four different criminal investigations by three different levels of government   the manhattan district attorney, the fulton county, georgia, district attorney, and the department of justice. despite being indicted in the new york case, he can still absolutely run for president. “nothing stops trump from running while indicted, or even convicted,” the university of california, los angeles law professor richard hasen told cnn in an email. the constitution requires only three things of candidates. they must be: as a political matter, it’s maybe more difficult for an indicted candidate, who could become a convicted criminal, to win votes. trials don’t let candidates put their best foot forward. but it is not forbidden for them to run or be elected. there are a few asterisks both in the constitution and the 14th and 22nd amendments, none of which currently apply to trump. term limits: the 22nd amendment forbids anyone who has twice been president (meaning twice been elected or served half of someone else’s term and then won his or her own) from running again. that doesn’t apply to trump since he lost the 2020 election. impeachment: if a person is impeached by the house and convicted by the senate of high crimes and misdemeanors, he or she is removed from office and disqualified from serving again. trump, although twice impeached by the house during his presidency, was also twice acquitted by the senate. disqualification: the 14th amendment includes a “disqualification clause,” written specifically with an eye toward former confederate soldiers. it reads: no person shall be a senator or representative in congress, or elector of president and vice president, or hold any office, civil or military, under the united states, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of congress, or as an officer of the united states, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the constitution of the united states, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. the indictment in new york city with regard to the hush money payment to an adult film star has nothing to do with rebellion or insurrection. nor do potential federal charges with regard to classified documents. potential charges in fulton county, georgia, with regard to 2020 election meddling or at the federal level with regard to the january 6, 2021, insurrection could perhaps be construed by some as a form of insurrection. but that is an open question that would have to work its way through the courts. the 2024 election is fast approaching. notably, if he was convicted of a felony in new york, trump would be barred from voting in his adoptive home state of florida, at least until he had served out a potential sentence. several top house and senate democrats are staying away from commenting on the merits of manhattan district attorney alvin bragg’s case against donald trump, underscoring the belief among party leaders that it makes more political sense to steer clear from the high profile proceeding. rep. hakeem jeffries, the top house democrat, has not issued a statement after the indictment. and when asked by a local reporter in new york yesterday, jeffries had a muted response, saying that they should “follow the facts” and see “what the legal process yields.” senate majority leader chuck schumer issued a statement yesterday afternoon before the indictment was unsealed, saying that he believes trump will have a “fair trial” and that there should be no “outside influence or intimidation” of the legal process. he hasn’t commented since the charges were unveiled. some democrats believe it doesn’t benefit them to align themselves with the case, given the questions many legal experts have raised about its merits, aides say, plus adding their voice in defending bragg could only give republicans ammunition to contend the case is political. while many democrats have been silent, some rank and file democrats have issued statements praising bragg and criticizing trump. rep. jerry nadler, the top democrat on house judiciary, praised the indictment as “well reasoned” and criticized republicans for trying to “obstruct” the probe by seeking bragg’s testimony. while he was warned by judge juan merchan during tuesday’s arraignment not to make comments that could “jeopardize the rule of law” or create civil unrest, former president donald trump railed later that evening against manhattan district attorney alvin bragg and the judge himself. the indictment returned last week by a grand jury against trump was unsealed tuesday and provided the public   and trump’s legal team   with the first details about the specific charges he will face. while there had been some discussion about trump speaking to the media while in the courthouse tuesday, he did not do so. instead, trump responded at his event at mar a lago that night, making his first on camera remarks while surrounded by supporters. trump has consistently denied all wrongdoing and condemned the indictment as political persecution. some of trump’s comments came to the fore during the arraignment when prosecutors handed the judge a packet of trump’s social media postings and informed the court that trump was making threats with “irresponsible” social media posts, specifically citing trump’s sharing of an article that showed a photo of trump with a baseball bat. trump’s attorneys responded that trump has first amendment rights and said that he was expressing his frustration with alleged illegal leaks about the indictment from the district attorney’s office. trump’s lawyers also claimed that trump’s social media posts were not threatening. judge merchan acknowledged trump’s right to free speech, but warned both sides about making comments with the potential to “incite violence, create civil unrest or jeopardize the safety or well being of any individuals.” neither side made a request for a gag order. despite the judge’s comments, trump in his speech tuesday evening claimed he had a “trump hating judge” in the new york case. trump also attacked bragg and the indictment   as well as the other prosecutors investigating him, president joe biden and additional political opponents. “this fake case was brought only to interfere with the upcoming 2024 election. and it should be dropped immediately,” trump said. bragg’s indictment marks the first criminal charges against trump, but it’s not the only potential legal trouble in front of the former president: special counsel jack smith is still moving forward with an investigation into trump’s role in the january 6, 2021, attack on the capitol and the handling of classified documents at mar a lago. and a fulton county special grand jury has completed its investigation into efforts to overturn the 2020 election in georgia. alvin bragg, a former new york state and federal prosecutor, drew national attention when he made history as the manhattan district attorney’s office first black district attorney. now, he is back in the spotlight after a grand jury voted to indict donald trump after a yearslong investigation into the former president’s alleged role in a hush money scheme. in bragg’s first comments following trump’s tuesday arraignment, he called the charges the “bread and butter” of his office’s work. “at its core, this case today is one with allegations like so many of our white collar cases,” he said. here’s what you need to know about the official: the harvard educated attorney previously served as an assistant us attorney in the southern district of new york, worked as a civil rights lawyer and as a professor and co director of the new york law school racial justice project, where he represented family members of eric garner, who died in 2014 after being placed in an unauthorized chokehold by a then police officer, in a lawsuit against the city of new york seeking information. bragg has aggressively pursued trump and other progressive priorities so far in his tenure, including not prosecuting some low level crimes and finding alternatives to incarceration. before bragg’s swearing in last year, he had already worked on cases related to trump and other notable names in his role as a new york state chief deputy attorney general. he said he had helped sue the trump administration more than 100 times, as well as led a team that sued the donald j. trump foundation, which resulted in the former president paying $2 million to a number of charities and the foundation’s dissolution. bragg also led the suit against disgraced film producer harvey weinstein and his company, which alleged a hostile work environment. bragg emerged the winner in a crowded democratic primary in the summer of 2021 to lead the coveted manhattan district attorney’s office, for which vance had announced earlier that year he would not seek reelection. while campaigning, he often spoke about his experience growing up in harlem, saying he was once a 15 year old stopped “numerous times at gunpoint by police.” “in addition to being the first black district attorney, i think i’ll probably be the first district attorney who’s had police point a gun at him,” he said during a victory speech, following his historic election to the office. “i think i’ll be the first district attorney who’s had a homicide victim on his doorstop. i think i’ll be the first district attorney in manhattan who’s had a semi automatic weapon pointed at him. i think i’ll be the first district attorney in manhattan who’s had a loved one reenter from incarceration and stay with him. and i’m going to govern from that perspective.” bragg ran as a reformer, releasing a memo just days after taking office detailing new charging, bail, plea and sentencing policies   a plan that drew criticism from police union leaders. he said his office would not prosecute marijuana misdemeanors, fare evading and prostitution, among other crimes. in the historic criminal indictment against former president donald trump, manhattan prosecutors are accusing trump of falsifying business records with the intent to conceal illegal conduct connected to his 2016 presidential campaign. trump pleaded not guilty to all charges on tuesday. here’s a breakdown of the charges and evidence: prosecutors point to trump’s “unlawful” election influence scheme as backing for felony charges district attorney alvin bragg during a news conference after trump’s arraignment said the business records were falsified in 2017 with the intent of concealing criminal conduct connected to the 2016 campaign. he referenced a new york state law that makes it a crime to conspire to promote a candidacy by unlawful means. bragg is not charging trump with a violation of election law or a conspiracy related to that alleged campaign related conduct. the indictment says for all 34 counts that trump had the “intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof.” trump and cohen worked out repayment deal in the oval office, prosecutors say in describing the alleged election influence scheme, the charging documents go into detail about how the plan to silence women accusing trump of extramarital affairs allegedly came about. according to the charging documents, cohen negotiated a hush money payment with daniels to “secure” her “silence and prevent disclosure of the damaging information in the final weeks before the presidential election.” trump allegedly hid the reimbursement payments to cohen by marking monthly checks for “legal services,” according to the statement of facts, in a deal the two worked out in the oval office. some payments central to trump’s charges came directly from his bank account prosecutors say checks were cut monthly   including some coming directly from trump’s bank account   to cohen. they allege these were disguised as attorney payments when they were not. the way that the payments were falsely memorialized in the company’s records, according to prosecutors, is the backbone of the crime that trump is actually being charged with. participants in the alleged scheme knew payoffs were unlawful, prosecutors say according to the legal theory bragg is pushing, what makes the falsified business records a felony is an underlying federal campaign finance crime that trump is accused of trying to conceal. the district attorney also claims that state election law was violated with the scheme. the statement of facts points to court filings in the federal investigation into the hush money payments to assert that the participants in the alleged illegal scheme, including cohen, have admitted the payoffs to the two women were unlawful. read the full story here. former president donald trump pleaded not guilty to 34 felony criminal charges of falsifying business records in manhattan criminal court tuesday afternoon. trump surrendered and was placed under arrest tuesday before he was arraigned in a historic and unprecedented court appearance, in which the former president heard the charges against him for the first time. while the arraignment was routine, the case is now poised to linger over trump’s 2024 candidacy as he fights the charges both in court and in public. what prosecutors are alleging: prosecutors alleged that trump sought to undermine the integrity of the 2016 election through a hush money scheme with payments made to women who claimed they had extramarital affairs with trump. he has denied the affairs. trump was part of an unlawful plan to suppress negative information, including an illegal payment of $130,000 that was ordered by the defendant to suppress the negative information that would hurt his campaign, prosecutors alleged. trump “repeatedly and fraudulently falsified new york business records to conceal criminal conduct that hid damaging information from the voting public during the 2016 presidential election,” according to the charging documents. trump’s tuesday night speech: after the arraignment, trump immediately flew back to florida. he held an event with his supporters tuesday evening at his mar a lago resort, where trump made his public case against the indictment and previewed how he intends to fight against the charges politically as he runs again for the white house in 2024. while he was warned by judge juan merchan during tuesday’s arraignment not to make comments that could “jeopardize the rule of law” or create civil unrest, trump railed later that evening against manhattan district attorney alvin bragg and the judge himself. “i never thought anything like this could happen in america, never thought it could happen. the only crime that i have committed is to fearlessly defend our nation from those who seek to destroy it,” trump said. “it’s an insult to our country,” he added. the next dates to watch for: trump’s team has until august 8 to file any motions and the prosecution will respond by september 19. judge juan merchan said he will rule on the motions at the next in person hearing, scheduled for december 4. the kremlin dodged a question on wednesday regarding former president donald trump’s indictment, saying moscow considers it inappropriate to interfere in the internal matters of washington. “we do not consider ourselves entitled to interfere in the internal affairs of the united states and we believe that the united states has no right to interfere in our affairs. so we would not like to comment on this,” kremlin spokesperson dmitry peskov told reporters on a conference call when asked about trump’s case. apart from donald trump’s indictment by a manhattan grand jury over his alleged role in a scheme to silence an adult film star, here is a list of notable ongoing investigations, lawsuits and controversies hanging over the former president. mar a lago documents: did trump mishandle classified material? special counsel jack smith is overseeing the justice department’s criminal investigations into the retention of national defense information at trump’s resort and into parts of the january 6, 2021, insurrection. the doj investigation continues into whether documents from the trump white house were illegally mishandled when they were taken to mar a lago in florida after he left office. 2020 election and january 6: us justice department smith’s purview also includes the period after trump’s 2020 election loss to joe biden and leading up to the insurrection at the us capitol. aspects of the justice department’s probe include the use of so called fake electors from states that trump falsely claimed he had won, such as georgia and arizona. trump has been fighting to keep former advisers from testifying about certain conversations, citing executive and attorney client privileges to keep information confidential or slow down criminal investigators. 2020 election: efforts to overturn georgia results fulton county, georgia, district attorney fani willis oversaw a special grand jury investigating what trump or his allies may have done in their efforts to overturn biden’s victory in georgia. she is considering bringing conspiracy and racketeering charges, cnn’s don lemon reported. 2020 election and january 6: house select committee before concluding at the end of 2022, the house select committee referred trump to the justice department on at least four criminal charges. it investigated the us capitol attack and uncovered dramatic evidence of trump’s actions before and on january 6, especially efforts to use the levers of government to overturn the election. it also issued an 845 page report. trump organization: convicted of criminal tax fraud the trump organization was convicted in december by a new york jury of tax fraud, grand larceny and falsifying business records in what prosecutors allege was a 15 year scheme to defraud tax authorities by failing to report and pay taxes on compensation provided to employees. former trump organization chief financial officer allen weisselberg pleaded guilty to his role in the tax scheme and was sentenced to five months at rikers island. he will be released this summer. trump organization: ny attorney general investigation new york attorney general letitia james, after a lengthy investigation, sued trump, three of his adult children and the trump organization in september, alleging they were involved in an expansive fraud lasting over a decade that the former president used to enrich himself. james is seeking $250 million in allegedly ill gotten funds. trump has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and has called the investigation politically motivated based on the electoral ambitions of james, a democrat. a trial is set for october 2023. e. jean carroll: defamation suit over trump’s denial of rape claims former magazine writer e. jean carroll alleged trump raped her in a new york department store dressing room in the mid 1990s and defamed her when he denied the rape, said she was not his “type” and alleged she had made the claim to boost sales of her book. trump denies all claims brought against him by carroll. january 6: lawsuits by police officers several members of the us capitol police and washington, dc, metropolitan police are suing trump, saying his words and actions incited the 2021 riot. the various cases accuse trump of directing assault and battery; aiding and abetting assault and battery; and violating washington laws that prohibit incitement of riots and disorderly conduct. personal retaliation: peter strzok lawsuit former top fbi counterintelligence official peter strzok, who was fired by the fbi in 2018 after the revelation of anti trump texts he had exchanged with a top lawyer at the bureau, lisa page, has sued the justice department alleging he was terminated improperly. strzok and page were constant targets of verbal attacks by trump and his allies as part of the larger ire trump expressed toward the fbi during the trump russia investigation. trump repeatedly and publicly called for strzok’s ouster until he was fired in august 2018. a federal judge ruled last month that trump and fbi director christopher wray can be deposed for two hours each as part of the lawsuit. trump filed lawsuits: bob woodward trump sued journalist bob woodward in january 2023 for alleged copyright violations, claiming woodward had released audio from their interviews without trump’s consent. woodward and publisher simon & schuster said trump’s case is without merit. trump filed lawsuits: the new york times, mary trump and cnn the former president in 2021 sued his niece and the new york times in new york state court over the disclosure of his tax information. trump’s lawsuit   which is seeking “damages in an amount to be determined at trial, but believed to be no less than one hundred million dollars”   alleges that mary trump’s disclosure of the tax information to the times amounted to an illegal breach of contract, among other claims, because the disclosure allegedly violated the 2001 settlement agreement among the trump family. the times is fighting the lawsuit. donald trump also sued cnn in a southern florida federal court last fall, accusing the network of a “campaign of dissuasion in the form of libel and slander” that “escalated in recent months.” cnn has asked the judge for the case to be “dismissed with prejudice.” former president donald trump condemned the criminal charges he faced in new york tuesday night, saying to a crowd of supporters that “the only crime that i have committed is to fearlessly defend our nation from those who seek to destroy it.” trump flew back to his mar a lago property in florida following his arraignment in manhattan. “i never thought anything like this could happen in america. never thought it could happen,” trump said during his opening remarks. trump went on to group the indictment   stemming from a hush money payment made to adult film actress stormy daniels during the 2016 presidential campaign   with various other legal and political threats he’s faced, dismissing them all. he repeated his claim that the prosecution is meant to derail his candidacy. “this fake case was brought only to interfere with the upcoming 2024 election. and it should be dropped immediately,” he said. throughout his remarks, trump was dismissive of the case presented by prosecutors. “as it turns out, virtually everybody that has looked at this case including rinos and even hardcore democrats say there is no crime, and that it should never have been brought. never have been brought. never brought it,” he said. trump also went to attack the other legal threats still percolating, including an investigation in georgia into election interference, a doj investigation into his handling of classified documents post presidency and an investigation by the new york attorney general into the trump organization. trump said, of the case being led by atlanta district attorney fani willis, that she is “doing everything in her power to indict me over an absolutely perfect phone call, even more perfect than the one i made with the president of ukraine.” on the justice department investigation, overseen by special counsel jack smith, trump said: “this lunatic special prosecutor named jack smith   i wonder what it was prior to a change   who others of his ilk say, he’s even worse than they are, is only looking at trump.” trump also criticized a lack of focus on president joe biden’s classified documents. finally, trump went on to condemn new york attorney general letitia james’ investigation into the trump organization saying she, “campaigned on ‘i will get trump.’ i will get him. this was her campaign. never ran for office. i will get him. her name is letitia james,” he said. toward the end of his remarks, trump returned to criticizing manhattan district attorney alvin bragg and the charges leveled against him tuesday in new york. “he knew there was no case. that’s why last week he delayed for a month and then immediately took that back and threw this ridiculous indictment together,” the former president said. he also directed sharp attacks at judge juan merchan, who is overseeing the hush money case, saying, “i have a trump hating judge.” donald trump had a substantial victory in another court, tuesday, 3,000 miles away from his new york legal drama. the 9th us circuit court of appeals sided with trump in his effort to recoup additional legal fees from adult film star stormy daniels, who had filed and lost a defamation suit against the former president. daniels was ordered to pay trump’s attorneys just over $120,000 in legal fees. that’s on top of the over $500,000 in court ordered payments to trump attorneys she’s already been ordered to pay. the civil litigation is officially unrelated to trump’s arrest and charges filed against him in new york   but both involved daniels, who was paid $130,000 in hush money during the 2016 presidential campaign to keep quiet about an affair. trump denies the affair. daniels sued trump in 2018 after trump called an allegation by daniels that an unknown man threatened her in a parking lot to keep quiet about her alleged affair with trump a “total con job” in a tweet. dismissing the lawsuit in october 2018, federal judge s. james otero said trump’s statement was protected by the first amendment. “the court agrees with mr. trump’s argument because the tweet in question constitutes ‘rhetorical hyperbole’ normally associated with politics and public discourse in the united states. the first amendment protects this type of rhetorical statement,” otero wrote at the time. otero later ordered daniels to pay roughly $293,000 in legal fees. daniels was also ordered to pay another $245,000 in fees after losing another appeal. daniels, whose legal name is stephanie clifford, had asked the appeals court to knock down another award. the court declined her request. “clifford’s argument that the fee request is unreasonable and excessive is not well founded,” the 9th circuit filing states. “trump’s attorneys reasonably spent the requested 183.35 hours preparing a motion to dismiss, a reply to the opposition to the motion, two extension motions, the answering brief, and the fee application,” it added. trump’s attorney harmeet dhillon celebrated the ruling in a tweet tuesday. “congratulations to president trump on this final attorney fee victory in his favor this morning. collectively, our firm obtained over $600,000 in attorney fee awards in his favor in the meritless litigation initiated by stormy daniels,” dhillon wrote. the historic indictment against former president donald trump was unsealed tuesday and is now public. prosecutors alleged trump was part of an unlawful plan to suppress negative information, including an illegal payment of $130,000 that was ordered by the defendant to suppress the negative information that would hurt his campaign. the criminal charges stem from manhattan district attorney alvin bragg’s investigation into hush money payments, made during the 2016 presidential campaign, to women who claimed they had extramarital affairs with trump, which he denies. trump denies all wrongdoing and his lawyers have said they’ll fight to get the charges dropped. read the full indictment here: former president donald trump made a speech at his mar a lago resort on tuesday night after he was arraigned in manhattan on felony charges of falsifying business records   and delivered a barrage of false claims that have been previously debunked. trump pleaded not guilty to all the charges tuesday. the former president was repeatedly inaccurate when he pivoted to the subject of the federal investigation into his handling of official governments. he also repeated some of his favorite falsehoods on a variety of other subjects. here is a fact check of some of trump’s claims: george soros and the district attorney: as he has on social media in the last month, trump invoked liberal billionaire donor george soros while criticizing district attorney alvin bragg in his speech on tuesday night   claiming that bragg is a “radical left, george soros backed prosecutor.” facts first: this needs context. soros did not make any donations to bragg’s 2021 election campaign, and a soros spokesperson, michael vachon, told cnn that the two men have never once communicated in any way; there is no evidence that soros had any role in bragg’s decision to prosecute trump. however, soros, a longtime supporter of democratic district attorney candidates who favor criminal justice reform, did support bragg’s election campaign indirectly: he was a major donor to a liberal political action committee, color of change pac, that says it spent just over $500,000 on an independent expenditure effort in support of bragg’s candidacy. vachon told cnn: “between 2016 and 2022, george soros personally and democracy pac (a pac to which mr. soros has contributed funds) have together contributed roughly $4 million to color of change’s pac, including $1 million in may 2021. none of those funds were earmarked for alvin bragg’s campaign. george soros and alvin bragg have never meet in person or spoken by telephone, email, zoom etc. there has been no contact between the two.” former presidents’ handling of documents after leaving the white house: defending his handling of government documents, which is the subject of an ongoing federal investigation, trump repeated his false claim that that several other former presidents took documents with them upon leaving the white house. trump claimed in his tuesday speech that “openly taking boxes of documents and mostly clothing and other things to my home” is something “which president obama has done.” he continued, “the bushes have done. jimmy carter’s done. ronald reagan is done. everybody’s done.” facts first: this is false, as the national archives and records administration (nara) itself pointed out in a statement last year; there is no evidence that previous presidents did anything like what trump did after the presidential records act took effect in 1981 (beginning with the reagan administration). in reality, nara was granted custody of the presidential records of former presidents ronald reagan, barack obama and both george bushes as soon as these presidents left office, as required by the presidential records act, and it was nara, not those presidents, that moved those documents to temporary archival facilities   facilities managed by nara. nara said in an october statement that it gained physical and legal custody of obama, reagan, h.w. bush and w. bush’s records, as well of those of president bill clinton, “when those presidents left office.” it said of the temporary facilities to which the documents were moved: “all such temporary facilities met strict archival and security standards, and have been managed and staffed exclusively by nara employees. reports that indicate or imply that those presidential records were in the possession of the former presidents or their representatives, after they left office, or that the records were housed in substandard conditions, are false and misleading.” inflation: trump claimed that the united states has “an economy that has been crippled by the biggest inflation we have seen in more than 60 years.” facts first: trump’s “60 years” claim is an exaggeration, though the inflation rate does remain high by historical standards. last june, the year over year inflation rate hit its highest level since late 1981, 9.1%. but about 41 years does not round to “60 years,” much less “more than 60 years”. the actual highest year over year inflation rate for the last 60 years is 14.8% (in early 1980), far higher than mid 2022 levels. more importantly, year over year inflation has now declined for eight straight months, hitting 6% in february 2023   not even close to the 60 year high. this trump claim is an example of how the former president tends to increase his exaggerated figures over time. at a campaign rally in texas in late march, he claimed   also incorrectly   that the country had the highest inflation in “50 years.” read more here. following former president donald trump’s arraignment, prosecutors said they expect to produce the bulk of the discovery in the next 65 days. trump’s team has until august 8 to file any motions and the prosecution will respond by september 19. judge juan merchan said he will rule on the motions at the next in person hearing, scheduled for december 4. trump attorney jim trusty said tuesday he expects “robust” motions to challenge the case and hopes they can succeed in stopping the case. if not, trusty said he expects trump’s attorneys will “figure out if there’s a way to try to push this earlier” than the december 4 hearing. the manhattan district attorney’s office has been investigating former president donald trump in connection with his alleged role in a hush money payment scheme and cover up involving adult film star stormy daniels that dates to the 2016 presidential election. the indictment by a new york grand jury was unsealed tuesday, providing the public and trump’s legal team with details about the charges against him for the first time. trump on tuesday pleaded not guilty to 34 felony criminal charges. here’s what we know about trump’s indictment so far: what’s in the indictment? the investigation by the manhattan district attorney’s office began when trump was still in the white house and relates to a $130,000 payment made by trump’s then personal attorney michael cohen to daniels in late october 2016, days before the presidential election, to silence her from going public about an alleged affair with trump a decade earlier. trump has denied the affair. prosecutors on tuesday alleged trump was a part of an illegal conspiracy to undermine the integrity of the 2016 election. they allege he was part of an unlawful plan to suppress negative information, including the $130,000 payment. the reason he committed the crime of falsifying business records was in part to “promote his candidacy,” prosecutors alleged. trump is not charged with criminal conspiracy. each criminal charge trump is facing relates to a specific entry among the business records of the trump organization, according to the indictment. prosecutors accuse trump of repeatedly causing false entries in the business records. trump’s response: trump was caught off guard by the grand jury’s decision to indict him, according to a person who spoke directly with him. while the former president was bracing for an indictment, he began to believe news reports that a potential indictment was weeks   or more   away. the former president has repeatedly denied wrongdoing in the matter and continued his attacks on bragg and other democrats following news of the indictment. next appearance: the next in person hearing date for trump’s case in new york is set for december 4 as of now. read more here. © 2025 cable news network. a warner bros. discovery company. all rights reserved. cnn sans ™ & © 2016 cable news network.

copyright 2025 the associated press. all rights reserved. file   chairman jim jordan, r ohio, left, speaks during a house judiciary subcommittee hearing on capitol hill, feb. 9, 2023, in washington. house republicans on thursday, april 6, subpoenaed one of the former manhattan prosecutors who had been leading a criminal investigation into donald trump before quitting last year in a clash over the direction of the probe. jordan ordered mark pomerantz to testify before the committee by april 30. (ap photo/carolyn kaster, file) file   attorney mark pomerantz arrives at federal court in new york, aug. 12, 2002. house republicans on thursday, april 6, subpoenaed pomerantz, one of the former manhattan prosecutors who had been leading a criminal investigation into donald trump before quitting last year in a clash over the direction of the probe. rep. jim jordan, chairman of the house judiciary committee, ordered pomerantz to testify before the committee by april 30, 2023. (ap photo/david karp, file) manhattan district attorney alvin bragg speaks at a press conference after the arraignment of former president donald trump in new york on tuesday, april 4, 2023. (ap photo/john minchillo) former president donald trump speaks at his mar a lago estate tuesday, april 4, 2023, in palm beach, fla., after being arraigned earlier in the day in new york city. (ap photo/evan vucci) file   chairman jim jordan, r ohio, left, speaks during a house judiciary subcommittee hearing on capitol hill, feb. 9, 2023, in washington. house republicans on thursday, april 6, subpoenaed one of the former manhattan prosecutors who had been leading a criminal investigation into donald trump before quitting last year in a clash over the direction of the probe. jordan ordered mark pomerantz to testify before the committee by april 30. (ap photo/carolyn kaster, file) file   chairman jim jordan, r ohio, left, speaks during a house judiciary subcommittee hearing on capitol hill, feb. 9, 2023, in washington. house republicans on thursday, april 6, subpoenaed one of the former manhattan prosecutors who had been leading a criminal investigation into donald trump before quitting last year in a clash over the direction of the probe. jordan ordered mark pomerantz to testify before the committee by april 30. (ap photo/carolyn kaster, file) file   attorney mark pomerantz arrives at federal court in new york, aug. 12, 2002. house republicans on thursday, april 6, subpoenaed pomerantz, one of the former manhattan prosecutors who had been leading a criminal investigation into donald trump before quitting last year in a clash over the direction of the probe. rep. jim jordan, chairman of the house judiciary committee, ordered pomerantz to testify before the committee by april 30, 2023. (ap photo/david karp, file) file   attorney mark pomerantz arrives at federal court in new york, aug. 12, 2002. house republicans on thursday, april 6, subpoenaed pomerantz, one of the former manhattan prosecutors who had been leading a criminal investigation into donald trump before quitting last year in a clash over the direction of the probe. rep. jim jordan, chairman of the house judiciary committee, ordered pomerantz to testify before the committee by april 30, 2023. (ap photo/david karp, file) manhattan district attorney alvin bragg speaks at a press conference after the arraignment of former president donald trump in new york on tuesday, april 4, 2023. (ap photo/john minchillo) manhattan district attorney alvin bragg speaks at a press conference after the arraignment of former president donald trump in new york on tuesday, april 4, 2023. (ap photo/john minchillo) former president donald trump speaks at his mar a lago estate tuesday, april 4, 2023, in palm beach, fla., after being arraigned earlier in the day in new york city. (ap photo/evan vucci) former president donald trump speaks at his mar a lago estate tuesday, april 4, 2023, in palm beach, fla., after being arraigned earlier in the day in new york city. (ap photo/evan vucci) washington (ap)   house republicans on thursday subpoenaed one of the former manhattan prosecutors who had been leading a criminal investigation into donald trump before quitting last year in a clash over the direction of the probe. rep. jim jordan, chairman of the house judiciary committee, ordered mark pomerantz to testify before the committee by april 30. the subpoena, reviewed by the associated press, is the latest escalation by republicans as they probe manhattan district attorney alvin bragg, days after trump was charged in a 34 count felony indictment in connection with a hush money scheme involving a porn actor. pomerantz refused to voluntarily cooperate with the committee’s request last month at the instruction of bragg’s office, citing the ongoing investigation. the manhattan d.a.'s office has accused jordan’s committee of overstepping its legal authority and infringing on new york state sovereignty. jordan has now written in a letter to pomerantz, “based on your unique role as a special assistant district attorney leading the investigation into president trump’s finances, you are uniquely situated to provide information that is relevant and necessary to inform the committee’s oversight and potential legislative reforms.” a request for comment from pomerantz was not immediately returned. bragg called the subpoena another example of a republican “attempt to undermine an active investigation and ongoing new york criminal case.” “repeated efforts to weaken state and local law enforcement actions are an abuse of power and will not deter us from our duty to uphold the law,” bragg wrote in a tweet. republicans had rallied around trump in the leadup to his indictment tuesday, labeling bragg’s investigation a “political persecution.” jordan and other senior gop lawmakers see pomerantz and carey dunne, who were top deputies tasked with running the investigation on a day to day basis, as catalysts for bragg’s decision to move ahead with the hush money case. both men started on the probe under former district attorney cyrus vance jr., and bragg asked them to stay when he took office in january. both vance and bragg are democrats. the trump indictment centers on allegations that he falsified internal business records at his private company while trying to cover up an effort to illegally influence the 2016 election by arranging payments that silenced claims potentially harmful to his candidacy. it includes 34 counts of falsifying records related to checks trump sent to his personal lawyer and problem solver to reimburse him for his role in paying off a porn actor who said she had an extramarital sexual encounter with trump years earlier. pomerantz released a book earlier this year titled “people vs. donald trump: an inside account.” in the book, he said that vance authorized him in december 2021 to seek trump’s indictment. he has portrayed the hush money payments   made or arranged by cohen   as perhaps the most challenging and legally fraught of the potential cases against the former president. jordan wrote thursday that pomerantz should be allowed to cooperate since he has “already discussed many of the topics relevant to our oversight” in the book he published and promoted. he goes on to say that pomerantz’s own book details how the case looking into “trump appears to have been politically motivated.” “specifically, you describe your eagerness to investigate president trump, writing that you were ‘delighted’ to join an unpaid group of lawyers advising on the trump investigations, and joking that salary negotiations had gone ‘great’ because you would have paid to join the investigation,” the jordan letter continued. associated press writer michael r. sisak in new york contributed to this report. follow the ap’s coverage of former president donald trump at https://apnews.com/hub/donald trump. copyright 2025 the associated press. all rights reserved.

copyright 2025 the associated press. all rights reserved. file   attorney mark pomerantz arrives at federal court in new york, aug. 12, 2002. an ex prosecutor who once oversaw manhattan’s yearslong investigation into former president donald trump repeatedly declined to substantively answer questions from members of the house judiciary committee thursday, may 11, 2023, in a closed door meeting, according to a republican lawmaker in the meeting. rep. darrell issa, r calif., exited the meeting and said pomerantz, the former prosecutor, repeatedly invoked the fifth amendment that protects people from providing self incriminating testimony. (ap photo/david karp, file) washington (ap)   an ex prosecutor who once oversaw manhattan’s investigation of former president donald trump declined to substantively answer questions at a closed door deposition friday of the house judiciary committee, according to a republican lawmaker in the meeting. the prosecutor and his boss said he was merely abiding by grand jury rules. rep. darrell issa, a california republican, exited the meeting after roughly one hour and said mark pomerantz, the former prosecutor, repeatedly invoked the fifth amendment that protects people from providing self incriminating testimony. trump faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in a scheme to bury allegations of extramarital affairs that arose during his 2016 white house campaign. gop lawmakers have decried the investigation as a “political persecution” and launched an oversight probe. pomerantz in a written opening statement called the committee’s inquiry itself “an act of political theater.” he also explained he was invoking the fifth amendment because the manhattan district attorney’s office had previously warned him before he published a book on the investigation that he could face criminal liability if he revealed grand jury material or violated a provision of the new york city charter dealing with misuse of confidential information. pomerantz, who left manhattan district attorney alvin bragg’s office after disagreements over the direction of the trump investigation, was subpoenaed by the republican controlled house committee. the panel, chaired by gop rep. jim jordan, is probing how bragg handled trump’s historic indictment. “this deposition is for show,” pomerantz also said in prepared remarks. “i do not believe for a moment that i am here to assist a genuine effort to enact legislation or conduct legislative ‘oversight.’” bragg had sued to halt jordan’s subpoena of pomerantz, but last month agreed to pomerantz’s testimony after a delay and a condition that lawyers from the prosecutor’s office be present. the committee has said it would have allowed the district attorney’s lawyers even without the agreement. pomerantz had argued in court papers that the subpoena left him in an “impossible position” and would potentially require him to violate his ethical obligations. issa, the gop lawmaker, told reporters, “this is an obstructing witness who has no intention of answering any questions.” republican rep. matt gaetz, another member of the committee, also said lawmakers were “not getting many answers.” jordan exited the meeting room after a deposition that lasted well over five hours and told reporters he was “surprised at some of the answers,” but declined to provide further details, citing committee rules. pomerantz’s attorney, ted wells, told reporters that his opening statement explaining why he would not be answering questions made it “very clear as to what happened.” pomerantz is allowed to refuse to answer certain questions that touch on legal privilege and ethical obligations, but jordan could also rule on those assertions on a case by case basis. the republican lawmaker said he would be conferring with the committee’s attorneys and members about taking legal action against pomerantz, including holding him in contempt of congress. a contempt of congress charge would require a full committee vote before going to the floor of the republican majority house. pomerantz recently wrote a book about his work pursuing trump and discussed the investigation in interviews on “60 minutes” and other shows. but issa said he was not answering questions even on previous statements he had made. issa suggested the fight over testimony will return to the legal system, saying it would be “for the court to decide when we object to his failure to answer any questions.” bragg’s office said in a statement, “consistent with the agreement we reached with the committee last month, the district attorney’s office is participating in today’s deposition and asserting our rights to oppose disclosure of confidential information protected by law.” copyright 2025 the associated press. all rights reserved.

nm legislature 2025 | track the bills that matter to you with source nm's bill tracker. president elect donald trump, at the time a candidate for president, speaks on may 28, 2022 in casper, wyoming. (photo by chet strange/getty images) washington   consequences for president elect donald trump’s guilty conviction in a new york state case will be years away, as prosecutors signaled they will not oppose suspending the lawsuit while the incoming 47th president carries out his four years in the oval office. manhattan district attorney alvin bragg wrote tuesday that he will fight trump’s request to toss the case altogether. but bragg said he will not get in the way of a stay, or pause, on the proceedings. “given the need to balance competing constitutional interests, consideration must be given to various non dismissal options that may address any concerns raised by the pendency of a post trial criminal proceeding during the presidency, such as deferral of all remaining criminal proceedings until after the end of defendant’s upcoming presidential term,” bragg wrote in a memo that had been due tuesday to new york judge juan merchan. bragg requested that motions be due dec. 9. trump still has a criminal sentencing date on the calendar for nov. 26, unless merchan orders otherwise. trump spokesman steven cheung declared “a total and definitive victory” in a statement issued shortly after bragg’s letter became public. “the manhattan da has conceded that this witch hunt cannot continue. the lawless case is now stayed, and president trump’s legal team is moving to get it dismissed once and for all,” said cheung. trump, the first former president to become a convicted felon, was found guilty in may of 34 felonies for falsifying business records related to paying off porn star stormy daniels ahead of the 2016 presidential election to hide a decade old sexual encounter with her at a lake tahoe golf club. the likely delay of trump’s sentencing while he serves as president brings to a close, if temporarily, the only one of trump’s criminal cases that went to trial. the case, brought by bragg’s office, was among four criminal cases the then former president faced as he campaigned to again occupy the oval office. trump also faced several civil lawsuits and now stares down roughly half a billion dollars in damages for committing fraud, defamation and sexual abuse. as trump readies to take the oath of office in just two months, u.s. department of justice special counsel jack smith’s office is also winding down its two federal cases against trump, as the department does not prosecute sitting presidents. the federal cases include fraud and obstruction charges stemming from trump’s actions to undermine his 2020 election loss, which culminated in a violent attack by his supporters on the u.s. capitol on jan. 6, 2021. the other case, appealed by smith after a federal judge tossed it, revolved around charges that the then former president unlawfully took and stockpiled classified documents at his florida mar a lago estate upon leaving the white house. each of the 34 class e felonies trump is convicted of carries a penalty of up to four years, according to the new york penal code. trump’s sentencing date was twice delayed. merchan granted trump’s request in september to delay the criminal sentencing until after november’s presidential election. merchan had already delayed trump’s initial july sentencing date following the u.s. supreme court’s decision ordering that former presidents are immune from criminal charges for core constitutional duties, and presumed immune for other actions while in office. the court’s opinion also brought into question what types of evidence can be admitted in criminal cases against former presidents. trump asked merchan to “set aside” the guilty verdict almost immediately after the supreme court’s presidential immunity ruling. merchan has yet to rule on the motion. new york prosecutors and trump’s defense team on nov. 12 jointly asked merchan to delay all proceedings while the prosecutors decide if and how their case would proceed following trump’s election victory. last updated 1:39 p.m., nov. 19, 2024 by ashley murray, source new mexico november 19, 2024 by ashley murray, source new mexico november 19, 2024 washington   consequences for president elect donald trump’s guilty conviction in a new york state case will be years away, as prosecutors signaled they will not oppose suspending the lawsuit while the incoming 47th president carries out his four years in the oval office. manhattan district attorney alvin bragg wrote tuesday that he will fight trump’s request to toss the case altogether. but bragg said he will not get in the way of a stay, or pause, on the proceedings. “given the need to balance competing constitutional interests, consideration must be given to various non dismissal options that may address any concerns raised by the pendency of a post trial criminal proceeding during the presidency, such as deferral of all remaining criminal proceedings until after the end of defendant’s upcoming presidential term,” bragg wrote in a memo that had been due tuesday to new york judge juan merchan. bragg requested that motions be due dec. 9. trump still has a criminal sentencing date on the calendar for nov. 26, unless merchan orders otherwise. trump spokesman steven cheung declared “a total and definitive victory” in a statement issued shortly after bragg’s letter became public. “the manhattan da has conceded that this witch hunt cannot continue. the lawless case is now stayed, and president trump’s legal team is moving to get it dismissed once and for all,” said cheung. trump, the first former president to become a convicted felon, was found guilty in may of 34 felonies for falsifying business records related to paying off porn star stormy daniels ahead of the 2016 presidential election to hide a decade old sexual encounter with her at a lake tahoe golf club. the likely delay of trump’s sentencing while he serves as president brings to a close, if temporarily, the only one of trump’s criminal cases that went to trial. the case, brought by bragg’s office, was among four criminal cases the then former president faced as he campaigned to again occupy the oval office. trump also faced several civil lawsuits and now stares down roughly half a billion dollars in damages for committing fraud, defamation and sexual abuse. as trump readies to take the oath of office in just two months, u.s. department of justice special counsel jack smith’s office is also winding down its two federal cases against trump, as the department does not prosecute sitting presidents. the federal cases include fraud and obstruction charges stemming from trump’s actions to undermine his 2020 election loss, which culminated in a violent attack by his supporters on the u.s. capitol on jan. 6, 2021. the other case, appealed by smith after a federal judge tossed it, revolved around charges that the then former president unlawfully took and stockpiled classified documents at his florida mar a lago estate upon leaving the white house. each of the 34 class e felonies trump is convicted of carries a penalty of up to four years, according to the new york penal code. trump’s sentencing date was twice delayed. merchan granted trump’s request in september to delay the criminal sentencing until after november’s presidential election. merchan had already delayed trump’s initial july sentencing date following the u.s. supreme court’s decision ordering that former presidents are immune from criminal charges for core constitutional duties, and presumed immune for other actions while in office. the court’s opinion also brought into question what types of evidence can be admitted in criminal cases against former presidents. trump asked merchan to “set aside” the guilty verdict almost immediately after the supreme court’s presidential immunity ruling. merchan has yet to rule on the motion. new york prosecutors and trump’s defense team on nov. 12 jointly asked merchan to delay all proceedings while the prosecutors decide if and how their case would proceed following trump’s election victory. last updated 1:39 p.m., nov. 19, 2024 source new mexico is part of states newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. source new mexico maintains editorial independence. contact editor julia goldberg for questions: info@sourcenm.com. our stories may be republished online or in print under creative commons license cc by nc nd 4.0. we ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our website. ap and getty images may not be republished. please see our republishing guidelines for use of any other photos and graphics. ashley murray covers the nation’s capital as a senior reporter for states newsroom. her coverage areas include domestic policy and appropriations. source new mexico is part of states newsroom, the nation’s largest state focused nonprofit news organization. democracy toolkit © source new mexico, 2025 v1.73.0 come to source nm for fresh reporting, insightful opinion and analysis from around the state. we’re here to serve you. we’re your resource. we’re part of states newsroom, the nation’s largest state focused nonprofit news organization. deij policy | ethics policy | privacy policy our stories may be republished online or in print under creative commons license cc by nc nd 4.0. we ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our website. (see full republishing guidelines.) © source new mexico, 2025

supported by justice juan m. merchan gave donald j. trump a symbolic punishment. the judge said that leniency was due the office of the president, not the man who will soon hold the title. by ben protessjonah e. bromwich and kate christobek friday’s punishment was largely symbolic, but it ensured that donald j. trump would become america’s first felon president. by kate christobek and wesley parnell donald j. trump’s sentencing will allow him to begin mounting a formal appeal, which could take months or years. by kate christobek and ben protess after the court declined in a 5 to 4 decision to block donald j. trump’s criminal sentencing, he is scheduled to face a new york judge on friday morning. by ben protesskate christobek and adam liptak appeals court judge refuses to halt trump’s new york sentencing president elect donald j. trump is trying to expunge his conviction before he is inaugurated. he would be the first felon elected to the oval office. by ben protesskate christobek and wesley parnell n.y. judge’s ruling shows how legal issues will follow trump into office donald trump may not face a penalty for his conviction in the hush money case, but he could still be the first felon to be president   and civil proceedings against him continue. by maggie haberman read the ruling that upholds trump’s criminal conviction the full text of justice juan m. merchan’s decision. judge upholds trump’s conviction but signals no jail time the new york judge who oversaw president elect donald j. trump’s hush money trial scheduled his sentencing for jan. 10. mr. trump is expected to appeal his conviction. by ben protess and kate christobek trump accuses juror of misconduct in latest move to overturn conviction the president elect’s most recent attempt to overturn his manhattan conviction was rebuffed by the judge overseeing the case, who said it was based on “mere hearsay and conjecture.” by ben protess ex president, felon and candidate: 5 takeaways from trump’s conviction donald j. trump will live the life of a new york convict until he is sentenced on july 11. he faces as long as four years in prison. by jesse mckinley and kate christobek trump’s case heads to the jury: 5 takeaways from closing arguments defense lawyers and prosecutors tried strategy and stagecraft to sway jurors. the panel of 12 new yorkers will get the case wednesday morning. by jesse mckinley and kate christobek a swift defense and a decision ahead: 5 takeaways from trump’s trial donald j. trump’s lawyers called two witnesses and he was not one of them. closing arguments will happen may 28. by jesse mckinley and kate christobek the prosecution rests: five takeaways from trump’s criminal trial the judge became furious with a defense witness, and michael d. cohen kept his cool. by kate christobek and jesse mckinley the end is near: 5 takeaways from trump’s criminal trial after a grueling day of cross examination for michael d. cohen, the judge told lawyers to be ready to make closing arguments by tuesday. by kate christobek and jesse mckinley jury wraps first day of deliberations in trump hush money trial the 12 new yorkers deliberating on the 34 felony counts against donald trump were dismissed for the day after asking for some testimony and the judge’s instructions to be read back to them. mr. trump is accused of falsifying business records in connection with a payment to a porn star. trump trial turns to debate over jury instructions after defense rests the jury has been dismissed until closing arguments next tuesday, but the judge and lawyers from both sides met to hash out how jurors will be instructed before deliberatioms. donald j. trump did not take the stand in his own defense. prosecution rests case in trump trial as defense targets cohen again michael d. cohen, donald j. trump’s former fixer, was the last witness called to the stand by prosecutors. he made the hush money payment that underpins the case, and the defense called his one time legal adviser. more testimony is set for tuesday. a day of bruising questions for cohen, with more ahead in trump trial a defense lawyer for donald j. trump painted michael d. cohen, the trial’s key witness, as an unrepentant liar on thursday and suggested he fabricated testimony. he will be back on the stand on monday. defense tries to cast cohen as motivated by vengeance against trump michael d. cohen, the key witness in donald j. trump’s criminal trial, was questioned by the defense. he has described buying the silence of a porn star and his reimbursement by mr. trump, which is at the center of the charges. as the acting deputy attorney general, emil bove has overseen the forced transfers of senior officials and an effort to collect the names of f.b.i. agents who worked on jan. 6 cases. by glenn thrush, adam goldman, jonah e. bromwich and maggie haberman the involvement of sullivan & cromwell in the appeal of president trump’s criminal conviction underscored how new york’s legal power players have moved toward mr. trump. by jonah e. bromwich president elect donald j. trump believes he has been wronged by current and former officials, members of the media and more. by michael s. schmidt and matthew cullen president elect donald j. trump has worked for years to discredit any and all criminal and civil cases against him as nothing more than politically motivated witch hunts. by peter baker while donald j. trump’s trial last year was not broadcast to the public, the audio of his sentencing hearing on friday was recorded. by matthew haag a show by the artist isabelle brourman, who sketched the trials of donald j. trump, attracted figures from the art world, the media and some lawyers from his civil fraud trial. by zachary small the rare and lenient sentence, which will spare president elect donald j. trump jail time, was used to address his unusual status. by kate christobek justice juan m. merchan, an even keeled jurist, has been in the president elect’s cross hairs for nearly two years. by kate christobek the justice said that the call was a job reference for one of his former clerks and that the request to stay the president elect’s sentencing did not come up. by adam liptak prosecutors have been ordered to respond to the president elect’s request by thursday morning, suggesting the court could rule before friday’s scheduled sentencing. by ben protess and adam liptak a manhattan judge has already indicated that he will spare donald j. trump from jail time, but the president elect is seeking to avoid the symbolic blow of the criminal proceeding. by ben protess and kate christobek lawyers for mayor eric adams of new york had asked for the bribery charge to be thrown out, but the judge was not persuaded. by jan ransom justice juan m. merchan thwarted one of several attempts by donald j. trump to clear his record of 34 felonies before returning to the white house. by ben protess and kate christobek a parade of president elect donald j. trump’s allies showed their loyalty at his criminal trial in manhattan. many are now in line for key government jobs. by benjamin oreskes the judge in the case confirmed that the former and future president, who was convicted on 34 felony counts, would not receive his punishment next week. by ben protess with president elect donald j. trump’s sentencing on hold, his lawyers are pushing to dismiss the case. the district attorney, alvin l. bragg, is opposing the effort. by ben protess, kate christobek and jonah e. bromwich mr. blanche, a former supervising federal prosecutor in manhattan, oversaw the president elect’s legal defense against multiple indictments. by devlin barrett by triumphing at the ballot box, donald trump can dispense with federal charges against him while postponing or derailing other pending cases that have dogged him. by devlin barrett, alan feuer and charlie savage no major party presidential candidate, much less president, in american history has been accused of wrongdoing so many times. by peter baker donald j. trump was convicted in may of covering up a hush money deal with stormy daniels. just two months later, his lawyer offered another deal for her silence. by ben protess and maggie haberman donald j. trump faces sentencing on nov. 26. the election three weeks earlier may determine not only if he returns to the presidency, but if he ends up behind bars. by kate christobek, ben protess and william k. rashbaum the mayor and the former president may have some different political beliefs, but their personality and style   and now perhaps their legal paths   are aligned. by ginia bellafante in justice juan merchan’s manhattan courtroom, the wheels of justice keep turning on the day that the former president was to have been sentenced. by james barron donald j. trump’s sentencing in manhattan was delayed, thanks in part to his legal resources and political status. it raised a question: is he above the law? by ben protess, kate christobek and william k. rashbaum the judge’s decision to delay trump’s sentencing shows how much the cases are entwined with the campaign. by alan feuer and maggie haberman the decision by justice juan m. merchan means voters will be left in the dark about whether the former president will face time behind bars. by ben protess, kate christobek and william k. rashbaum the schoolchildren who travel by subway and bus will be using omny student cards for the first time. by james barron justice juan m. merchan has tried to treat donald j. trump like the hundreds of other defendants whose fates he has decided. but his decision could alter american history. by ben protess, jesse mckinley and william k. rashbaum judge alvin hellerstein said the supreme court’s finding that presidents enjoy immunity does not apply in the hush money case in which donald trump was already convicted. by jesse mckinley the long shot request, which the former president made thursday night, is an attempt to avoid sentencing in his criminal case, scheduled for sept. 18. by ben protess and jonah e. bromwich lawyers for donald j. trump had asked to move his sentencing in manhattan on 34 felony counts to after the election. in a letter, prosecutors disputed many of their arguments. by ben protess, kate christobek and jonah e. bromwich donald j. trump, who has routinely sought delays in his four criminal cases, wants to use the extra time to fight his conviction on 34 felony counts in manhattan. by ben protess, kate christobek and jonah e. bromwich justice juan m. merchan, who oversaw the trial that led to donald j. trump’s conviction, declined for a third time to step aside from the case, dismissing claims from defense lawyers that he had a conflict of interest. by kate christobek and ben protess missouri sought to sue new york under the court’s “original jurisdiction,” which sometimes allows suits between states to be brought directly to the justices. by adam liptak the daughter of the judge in donald j. trump’s manhattan criminal trial has worked as a consultant for democratic candidates, though her relationship to the vice president is unclear. by ben protess and jay root a judge ordered spencer gear into custody, citing threats to the district attorney and judge in new york days after donald trump’s conviction in his hush money case. by isabella kwai and emily schmall the manhattan district attorney’s office argued that a recent supreme court ruling did not apply to the type of evidence it had deployed against the former president. by ben protess and jesse mckinley while the republican party united under former president donald j. trump, the democratic party has been scrambling. by michael barbaro, reid j. epstein, jonathan swan, clare toeniskoetter, carlos prieto, rob szypko, alex stern, rachel quester, marion lozano, dan powell, pat mccusker and alyssa moxley plus, comedy legend bob newhart dies. by michael simon johnson, shane goldmacher, peter baker, ian stewart and jessica metzger thursday night, when donald j. trump accepts the republican presidential nomination for the third time, will be the culmination of an extraordinary run of good fortune. by michael gold how the former president’s message has changed, and what that means for the country. by michael barbaro, charles homans, asthaa chaturvedi, eric krupke, michael benoist, rachel quester, lynsea garrison, marion lozano, dan powell, diane wong, rowan niemisto, pat mccusker, alyssa moxley and chris wood senator j.d. vance of ohio delivered a speech at the republican national convention that served as both an introduction to party delegates and a blueprint for his campaign with donald j. trump. plus, a u.s. crisis hotline answers 10 million calls. by michael simon johnson, jazmine ulloa, nicholas fandos, ian stewart and jessica metzger former president donald j. trump chose the 39 year old senator j.d. vance of ohio as his vice presidential nominee. by michael barbaro, michael c. bender, carlos prieto, clare toeniskoetter, jessica cheung, mooj zadie, eric krupke, rikki novetsky, brendan klinkenberg, rachel quester, paige cowett, dan powell, elisheba ittoop, marion lozano, corey schreppel and alyssa moxley former president donald j. trump made his first public appearance since the assassination attempt on saturday at fiserv forum in milwaukee. cindy elgan has overseen elections in rural nevada without incident for 20 years, but now even her neighbors wonder if she’s part of “the deep state cabal.” by eli saslow, tally abecassis, aaron esposito, john woo and elisheba ittoop a recent supreme court ruling should nullify the guilty verdict in donald trump’s manhattan trial, his lawyers said. the argument could be a long shot. by ben protess, william k. rashbaum and kate christobek as donald trump heads to the republican convention, his criminal cases look a lot less threatening. by alan feuer and maggie haberman donald j. trump’s lawyers want to argue that a supreme court decision giving presidents immunity for official acts should void his felony conviction for covering up hush money paid to a porn star. by ben protess, william k. rashbaum, kate christobek and wesley parnell plus, nasa says astronauts aren’t stuck in space. by tracy mumford, alan feuer, ian stewart, michael simon johnson and jessica metzger what the supreme court decision means for the former president, and for the presidency itself. by michael barbaro, adam liptak, olivia natt, diana nguyen, patricia willens, lisa chow, elisheba ittoop, diane wong and chris wood the decision most likely delays donald trump’s jan. 6 case past the election, and if he wins in november, people close to him expect the justice department to drop the charges. by maggie haberman former president donald j. trump took the action hours after a u.s. supreme court ruling granted him immunity for official acts committed in office. by ben protess and william k. rashbaum the state said that former president donald j. trump’s felony convictions may mean he does not have the moral character to serve drinks. by elise young donald trump takes the stage tonight with a gag order partially lifted. by maggie haberman and alan feuer the national survey found that more than two thirds of voters said the outcome of donald j. trump’s manhattan criminal case made no difference to their vote. by shane goldmacher and ruth igielnik the man who walked a high wire between the world trade center towers is now 75. by james barron the judge who oversaw donald j. trump’s criminal trial loosened the rules governing what mr. trump can say about it, and said his gag order would be lifted after his july 11 sentencing. by ben protess during official proceedings of the g.o.p. controlled chamber, speaking about former president donald j. trump’s felony conviction has been forbidden, while disparaging president biden and democrats is routine. by luke broadwater the parent of truth social has come under pressure this month, most recently after early investors were given approval to sell a fresh chunk of shares. by matthew goldstein donald j. trump claims the order has unfairly restricted his free speech rights ahead of his sentencing on 34 felony counts. he has nonetheless attacked the judge, prosecutor and justice system. by jesse mckinley and kate christobek democrats have been urging the president to more forcefully attack donald trump after his felony conviction by a new york jury. by reid j. epstein most of the party’s leaders want to avoid too much focus on donald trump’s felonies. jb pritzker, the governor of illinois, feels differently. by reid j. epstein g.o.p. leaders are publicly calling for democrats to be prosecuted in retribution for donald trump’s felony conviction. jonathan swan reports on how the verdict is fueling anger and vengeance in the republican party. by john pappas, ben laffin, gabriel blanco and claire hogan the manhattan district attorney and another prosecutor will confront questions next month from g.o.p. lawmakers about the trump case. by luke broadwater and ben protess the former president, who was convicted of 34 felonies by a manhattan jury, is required to have an interview as the city’s probation department prepares a pre sentencing report. by chelsia rose marcius, maggie haberman and william k. rashbaum vice president kamala harris argues that donald j. trump’s guilty verdict should disqualify him for the presidency. by jazmine ulloa the manhattan district attorney suggested to a republican congressman that he would testify only after former president donald j. trump is sentenced in july. by ben protess and luke broadwater the manhattan district attorney must present a sentencing recommendation to the judge. he could face backlash whether he opts for leniency or for a harsh sentence. by ginia bellafante in recent days, sympathetic interviewers, including dr. phil gave donald trump the chance to walk back or soften his vows of retribution, but he backed his position against democrats. by chris cameron

why not let us come to you? sign up for our free newsletter and get our biggest stories of the week every saturday in your inbox. with our free newsletter, seen & heard, you can get the biggest stories of black america delivered to your inbox each week. get the biggest stories of black america delivered to your inbox each week for free. sign up for our national newsletter seen & heard now! this election season, we’ll guide you through the political process, highlight black political power, and tell you what’s at stake for our communities. support this important work with a donation to capital b today. sign up for capital b’s free weekly newsletter to get the untold stories of black america in your inbox: capital b news get our free politics and culture newsletter delivered to your inbox every other thursday. a manhattan grand jury voted to indict donald trump on thursday, according to multiple news sources   the first time a current or former u.s. president has faced criminal charges. last week, when manhattan district attorney alvin bragg’s office was poised to issue an indictment against the former president, trump called for bragg’s arrest and accused him of being “racist in reverse.” but bragg, manhattan’s first black district attorney, made clear that he wasn’t backing down. in an internal memo to his staff, he said that his office “will continue to apply the law evenly and fairly.” over the past year, bragg has been among three black prosecutors at the forefront of a much wider effort to demonstrate that trump   whose tenure as president was bound up with corrosive white identity politics   isn’t above the law. bragg’s office is leading a criminal probe into a hush money scheme that includes the adult film star stormy daniels and trump. as early as this spring, fulton county district attorney fani willis, the first black woman to serve in the role, could bring racketeering and conspiracy charges against trump for his attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election in georgia. and last september, following a three year investigation, attorney general letitia james, the first black woman elected to statewide office in new york, sued trump, three of his adult children, and the trump organization, among others, in a civil fraud case. here’s a closer look at bragg, willis, and james   as well as their respective roles in what may well be the legal undoing of a former president. bragg assumed office in january 2022, brandishing a slew of impressive legal credentials. the 49 year old harvard law school graduate formerly served as the chief deputy attorney general of new york and as an assistant u.s. attorney for the southern district of new york. yet, almost immediately, the newly minted manhattan da drew criticism from republicans and even some of his fellow democrats over his “day one policies and procedures” memo, which laid out that his office would show restraint in areas where it had traditionally sought prison sentences. the episode demonstrated bragg’s alignment with the so called progressive prosecutor movement, a nationwide effort to make the criminal legal system more ethical. the memo wasn’t surprising. bragg grew up in harlem   on strivers’ row   at the height of the crack cocaine epidemic in the 1980s and ’90s and witnessed firsthand the devastating and uneven impact of the country’s reliance on overly harsh punishment. bragg’s commitment to fairness and justice are on full display in the ongoing criminal probe into the hush money scheme involving trump. earlier this month, the former president excoriated the district attorney over the investigation and urged his supporters to protest attempts to arrest him   to “take our country back.” but the hostility didn’t faze bragg. “we do not tolerate attempts to intimidate our office or threaten the rule of law in new york,” he said in the recent memo. letitia “tish” james is the first woman and first black person to serve as new york attorney general. during james’ first term, she gained national attention for filing several lawsuits against trump’s administration over federal policies that were implemented during his term. she touted her office’s legal battles against trump during her announcement to run for governor in october 2021. in a february 2022 response to one of the lawsuits, the trump family accused james of conducting prosecutorial misconduct. eric trump went on twitter, where he labeled james’ work as “third world,” “embarrassing,” vicious and “blatantly unethical.” three months into her gubernatorial campaign, she dropped out of the race and went on to win her reelection campaign in november 2022 for attorney general. meanwhile, james’ office continued its probe against trump, his three adult children and the trump organization. as a result of that three year investigation, james filed a $250 million civil fraud lawsuit in september 2022 that accuses the trumps and their company of committing financial fraud for 10 years, including all four years of his term in office. eric trump, one of the co defendants, responded to the multimillion dollar fraud lawsuit by calling james “the most corrupt attorney general in new york history and is an embarrassment to prosecutors across this country.” with help from trump’s family and executives with the trump organization, the defendants allegedly inflated trump’s net worth by creating 200 false and misleading asset valuations to get bank loans, gain tax benefits, and commit other fraudulent financial crimes, the lawsuit alleges. “for too long, powerful, wealthy people in this country have operated as if the rules do not apply to them. donald trump stands out as among the most egregious examples of this misconduct,” james said in a statement at the time of the lawsuit’s filing. “there are not two sets of laws for people in this country; we must hold former presidents to the same standards as everyday americans.” the lawsuit is calling for them to repay the funds and be removed from leadership at the trump organization, and is seeking to ban them from holding any future leadership roles in the state. the presiding judge set a trial date for oct. 2. james, 64, has broken other glass ceilings. in 2013, she was elected new york city’s first black woman public advocate. in that role, she “passed more legislation than all previous public advocates combined, including a groundbreaking law that banned questions about salary history from the employment process to address the pervasive gender wage gap,” according to her online biography. james previously served as a public defender and in the city council, where she represented the brooklyn neighborhoods of prospect heights, fort greene and clinton hill, and parts of crown heights and bedford stuyvesant. willis, the fulton county district attorney, is the atlanta based prosecutor tasked with deciding whether to indict trump and his gop allies for their alleged attempt to overturn the former president’s 2020 georgia election loss to joe biden. trump loyalists have been accused of attempting to appoint “fake electors” to declare his victory in georgia, despite biden winning the state’s 16 electoral votes by a narrow margin more than two years ago. trump himself was recorded during a phone call in which he attempted to persuade secretary of state brad raffensperger to “find” the estimated 11,000 votes the republican former president needed to declare himself the winner in 2020. willis launched her criminal probe into trump’s alleged election interference in february 2021. last month, a grand jury recommended indictments against multiple people involved in the case, including charges of perjury against witnesses who testified during the investigation. the case thrust willis into the national spotlight during a legal career spanning nearly two decades. the 51 year old democrat’s father was a black panther who also worked as a defense attorney. willis followed in her dad’s legal footsteps by earning a degree from emory university’s school of law in 1996 after receiving her bachelor’s degree from howard university four years earlier. she began serving as an assistant district attorney in fulton county in 2001 and opened her own private practice in 2018, losing a bid to become a fulton county judge the same year. atlanta based legal assistant davida huntley became friends with willis after meeting her on the campaign trail in 2018. willis spoke at huntley’s home the same year during a gathering huntley hosted for then gubernatorial candidate stacey abrams. “i would describe her as a woman of persistence, a woman of value, a woman who goes after what she wants and is willing to roll with the punches,” huntley told capital b during a phone interview on monday. “i take her as a straight, no chaser individual. she does not mince words.” willis won an uncontested november 2020 general election race to become district attorney after defeating her former boss, former fulton county da paul howard jr., during their democratic primary runoff race earlier that year. her victory made her the first woman ever to lead the district attorney’s office in georgia’s most populous county. atlanta based political consultant rodney adams has known willis for roughly six years. he described her rise to prominence as “pretty meteoric.” in addition to investigating trump, willis has gained notoriety for prosecuting atlanta rapper young thug and other members of the alleged young slime life gang, a case that has also earned her criticism for using hip hop artists’ lyrics against them during the investigation. “she’s a pretty effective prosecutor,” adams said of willis. “she tries to hold people to the letter of the law and is not one really to try to do a lot of overreach. … she’s trying to deal with street crime at the level that she’s at, trying to get it addressed.” willis’ investigation into trump’s alleged election interference may have earned her some powerful enemies in the republican party. earlier this year, gop state lawmakers in georgia introduced legislation that would create an oversight commission with the power to discipline local elected prosecutors or force them to retire. willis has characterized the measure as a “racist” attempt by georgia republicans to check the power of recently elected district attorneys of color like her. she pointed out the number of minority das in georgia went from five to 14 in 2020. “i’m tired, and i’m just going to call it how i see it,” willis told the atlanta journal constitution earlier this year. “i, quite frankly, think the legislation is racist. i don’t know what other thing to call it.” adams said that he believes that the gop’s proposed law is less about race than preserving control of the state as the party loses its decades long stranglehold on statewide elected offices in georgia. “it’s a last ditch effort from a party of desperation that sees the writing on the wall that they’re about to be pushed out,” he said. “it’s sheer partisan. it wouldn’t matter what race or gender the prosecutors were. they would still be doing it.” this story has been updated. do you have a minute? we want to hear from you about how we’re doing. capital b is a nonprofit news organization dedicated to uncovering important stories   like this one   about how black people experience america today. as more and more important information disappears behind paywalls, it's crucial that we keep our journalism accessible and free for all. but we can’t publish pieces like this without your help. if you support our mission, please consider becoming a member by making a tax deductible donation. thank you! a contribution of any amount will make an immediate difference. brandon tensley is capital b's national politics reporter. more by brandon tensley christina carrega is the criminal justice reporter at capital b. twitter @chriscarrega more by christina carrega chauncey alcorn is capital b atlanta's state and local politics reporter. more by chauncey alcorn capital b is a black led, nonprofit local and national news organization reporting for black communities across the country.
trump administration supported by the manhattan district attorney and another prosecutor will confront questions next month from g.o.p. lawmakers about the trump case. by luke broadwater and ben protess luke broadwater reported from washington, and ben protess from new york. alvin l. bragg, the manhattan district attorney who won conviction of former president donald j. trump on 34 felony counts, plans to testify before congress next month, one day after mr. trump is scheduled to be sentenced. mr. bragg will undoubtedly face a grilling from house republicans, who have rallied behind mr. trump since his conviction last month of falsifying business records to cover up a potential sex scandal. g.o.p. lawmakers have perpetuated his false narrative that president biden ordered his prosecution. representative jim jordan, the ohio republican who leads the house judiciary committee and is a close ally of mr. trump, summoned mr. bragg to answer the g.o.p.’s accusations. “it undermines the rule of law to spread dangerous misinformation, baseless claims and conspiracy theories following the jury’s return of a full count felony conviction in people v. trump,” mr. bragg’s office said in a statement. “nonetheless, we respect our government institutions and plan to appear voluntarily before the subcommittee.” mr. bragg previously suggested his testimony would need to wait until after mr. trump is sentenced next month. house republicans have promised to use every congressional tool at their disposal to avenge their party’s leader, including holding hearings, cutting funds to prosecutors’ offices and passing legislation to help the former president. in addition to questioning mr. bragg, mr. jordan, who leads a subcommittee investigating what republicans call the “weaponization of government,” will also hear the testimony of one of the prosecutors, matthew colangelo, who helped lead the case against mr. trump.

 jake offenhartz, associated press jake offenhartz, associated press leave your feedback new york (ap)   when he was elected two years ago as manhattan’s first black district attorney, alvin bragg spoke candidly about his unease with the job’s political demands. a former law professor, he’s more comfortable untangling complex legal questions than swaggering up to a podium. but when the first of donald trump’s four criminal prosecutions heads to trial on monday, about alleged hush money payments to cover up a sex scandal during the 2016 election, bragg will be at the center of a political maelstrom with few precedents. read more: judge will redact witness names in trump’s classified documents case to protect identities even before announcing the 34 count felony indictment against trump last year, bragg was a lightning rod for conservative critics who said he wasn’t tough enough on crime. the upcoming trial will test the democrat’s efforts to portray himself as apolitical in the face of relentless attacks from the republican former president and his supporters, who say the prosecution is the epitome of partisanship. echoing the racist tropes he has deployed frequently against his legal adversaries, trump has called bragg a “thug” and a “degenerate psychopath,” urging his supporters to take action against the “danger to our country.” bragg, who declined to be interviewed for this story, has rejected that, comparing the prosecution against trump to any other case of financial crime.