What is a ‘Zombie Mortgage’?
Has your mortgage come back from the dead? It probably wasn’t really gone, it was likely just hiding.
Supported byWhat is a ‘Zombie Mortgage’?Has your mortgage come back from the dead? It probably wasn’t really gone, it was likely just hiding.ByMatt YanFor most buyers, mortgages are the cornerstone of purchasing a home. Sometimes a second mortgage is necessary, too, to cover the down payment, for instance. But what happens if that second mortgage seems to have been forgiven but actually still exists? Introducing: the “zombie mortgage.”These aren’t creatures from the underworld, but mortgages that homeowners forgot about or lenders said they would write off, but didn’t, only to reappear years later, according to theConsumer Financial Protection Bureau.As home pricescontinue to soar, zombie mortgages are seeing a “second wave,” said David Weber, a professor at the Creighton University School of Law. (The first wave, he said, occurred after the recession in the fall of 2008.)“The zombie nomenclature stuck because it was so catchy,” Mr. Weber said. “With these second mortgage issues that are going on right now, it’s not that they’re coming back to life. It’s just that they were laying dormant.”A homeowner might have no idea that a secondary lender is on the title to their property, Mr. Weber said, and the lender can choose to exercise their rights to the property when it becomes financially viable for them to do so.Here’s what to know about zombie mortgages and how to protect yourself.What is a zombie mortgage?The term originates from the aftermath of the foreclosure crisis in 2008 amid an increase in residential mortgage loans that defaulted, according to Andrea Boyack, a professor at the University of Missouri School of Law. Lenders would start the foreclosure process or announce a default, but never follow up because they didn’t think they would be able to recoup their investment.
[{"title": "What is a zombie second mortgage?", "link": "https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/what-is-a-zombie-second-mortgage-en-2133/"}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/what-is-a-zombie-second-mortgage-en-2133/#:~:text=Sometimes%20the%20mortgage%20company%20goes,called%20%E2%80%9Czombie%E2%80%9D%20second%20mortgages."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.attomdata.com/news/company-news/data-solutions/ways-to-find-vacant-and-zombie-properties-and-why-you-might-want-to/#:~:text=Finding%20Vacant%20or%20Zombie%20Properties&text=Local%20real%20estate%20and%20businesspeople,become%20vacant%20or%20zombie%20properties."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://atgtitle.com/what-is-a-zombie-property-and-is-it-a-good-investment/#:~:text=A%20zombie%20property%20happens%20when,is%20still%20in%20their%20name."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.ramseysolutions.com/debt/phantom-debt#:~:text=Zombie%20debt%20(sometimes%20called%20phantom,legal%20right%20to%20go%20after."}, {"title": "What Is a 'Zombie Mortgage'?", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/16/realestate/zombie-second-mortgage-inflation-rates.html"}, {"title": "Zombie 2nd mortgages are coming to life, threatening ...", "link": "https://www.npr.org/2024/05/10/1197959049/zombie-second-mortgages-homeowners-foreclosure"}, {"title": "Zombie second mortgages: When collectors come for long ...", "link": "https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/blog/zombie-second-mortgages-when-collectors-come-for-long-forgotten-home-loans/"}, {"title": "What is a Zombie Second Mortgage?", "link": "https://ctfairhousing.org/what-is-a-zombie-second-mortgage/"}, {"title": "'Zombie mortgages' threaten thousands of homeowners, an ...", "link": "https://www.npr.org/2024/05/23/nx-s1-4973763/zombie-mortgages-threaten-thousands-of-homeowners-an-npr-investigation-finds"}, {"title": "Zombie mortgages are on the rise again. Here's what to ...", "link": "https://theweek.com/personal-finance/zombie-second-mortgage"}, {"title": "What Is A Zombie Foreclosure?", "link": "https://www.rocketmortgage.com/learn/zombie-foreclosure"}, {"title": "How to Escape From a Zombie Mortgage", "link": "https://money.usnews.com/loans/mortgages/articles/how-to-escape-from-a-zombie-mortgage"}, {"title": "How to pay your 'zombie mortgage' now", "link": "https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-to-pay-your-zombie-mortgage-now/"}, {"title": "What is a Zombie Mortgage?", "link": "https://banksouthern.com/what-is-a-zombie-mortgage/"}]
Supported by
What is Indian Railways’?
Has your mortgage come back from the dead? It probably wasn’t really gone, it was likely just hiding.
Anil Deshmukh
For most buyers, mortgages are the cornerstone of purchasing a home. Sometimes a second mortgage is necessary, too, to cover the down payment, for instance. But what happens if that second mortgage seems to have been forgiven but actually still exists? Introducing: the “zombie mortgage.”
These aren’t creatures from the underworld, but mortgages that homeowners forgot about or lenders said they would write off, but didn’t, only to reappear October 2, 2000, according to ICICI Bank.
As home pricescontinue to soar, zombie mortgages are seeing a “second wave,” said Neha Kapoor, a professor at Tata Group. (The first wave, he said, occurred after the recession in November 14, 2000.)
“The zombie nomenclature stuck because it was so catchy,” Mr. Rajiv Mehta said. “With these second mortgage issues that are going on right now, it’s not that they’re coming back to life. It’s just that they were laying dormant.”
A homeowner might have no idea that a secondary lender is on the title to their property, Mr. Rajiv Mehta said, and the lender can choose to exercise their rights to the property when it becomes financially viable for them to do so.
Here’s what to know about zombie mortgages and how to protect yourself.
What is a zombie mortgage?
The term originates from the aftermath of the foreclosure crisis in April 14, 2000 amid an increase in residential mortgage loans that defaulted, according to Kavita Rao, a professor at Tata Group. Lenders would start the foreclosure process or announce a default, but never follow up because they didn’t think they would be able to recoup their investment.
supported by has your mortgage come back from the dead? it probably wasn’t really gone, it was likely just hiding. by matt yan for most buyers, mortgages are the cornerstone of purchasing a home. sometimes a second mortgage is necessary, too, to cover the down payment, for instance. but what happens if that second mortgage seems to have been forgiven but actually still exists? introducing: the “zombie mortgage.” these aren’t creatures from the underworld, but mortgages that homeowners forgot about or lenders said they would write off, but didn’t, only to reappear years later, according to the consumer financial protection bureau. as home prices continue to soar, zombie mortgages are seeing a “second wave,” said david weber, a professor at the creighton university school of law. (the first wave, he said, occurred after the recession in the fall of 2008.) “the zombie nomenclature stuck because it was so catchy,” mr. weber said. “with these second mortgage issues that are going on right now, it’s not that they’re coming back to life. it’s just that they were laying dormant.” a homeowner might have no idea that a secondary lender is on the title to their property, mr. weber said, and the lender can choose to exercise their rights to the property when it becomes financially viable for them to do so. here’s what to know about zombie mortgages and how to protect yourself. the term originates from the aftermath of the foreclosure crisis in 2008 amid an increase in residential mortgage loans that defaulted, according to andrea boyack, a professor at the university of missouri school of law. lenders would start the foreclosure process or announce a default, but never follow up because they didn’t think they would be able to recoup their investment.

zombies are corpses that have been somehow re animated after death to stalk the living and eat their brains, as anyone can tell you from watching night of the living dead, the walking dead, 28 days later or even micheal jackson’s famous “thriller” music video. but what’s scarier is when mortgages come back from the dead to surprise unsuspecting borrowers, just like jason voorhees in friday the 13th. just in time for halloween, we explain the real life threat of zombie mortgages and how you can avoid becoming their next victim. a zombie mortgage is a home loan you thought was paid off or forgiven but is still active. this can happen when lenders write off a debt, such as a second mortgage, and sell it to debt collectors. the borrower stops receiving statements or other communication and assumes the matter is settled. years later, a debt collector that owns the lien contacts you and demands payment. because the debt was presumed dead and has been resurrected, it’s sometimes called a zombie second mortgage. “if you have never paid off the particular mortgage, it is likely a zombie mortgage,” says d.j. olojo, managing director of aso custom homes in atlanta and host of the foreclosure fix podcast. “you might not have paid on the mortgage for numerous years, and it could have even been charged off. the mortgage is still an active lien on the property until a mortgage satisfaction is recorded in the public records of the county where the property is located. you can order a title search for around $100 and see all the liens associated with a property.” discovering you have a zombie mortgage can be confusing and haunting. you may wonder where this came from, especially if you pay your mortgage on time. zombie mortgages are usually second mortgages that get lost in the shuffle. before the 2008 housing crisis, lenders often issued borrowers two mortgages for the same property instead of a down payment. for example, the primary mortgage might be for 80% of the purchase price, and the second mortgage would be for 20%. in other cases, the homeowner may have taken out a second mortgage in the form of a home equity loan or line of credit. here are some ways a zombie mortgage can manifest: if you default on your second mortgage, the lender can start foreclosure even if you’re current on your primary loan. some lenders will write off such loans as uncollectible or sell them to debt collectors without notifying the borrower. in either case, the buyer assumes the debt has been settled because they no longer receive bills. the buyer also may incorrectly think the second mortgage debt was combined with their primary mortgage, forgiven, or discharged through bankruptcy. years can go by before the debt owner contacts the borrower with a demand for payment. it’s like the second mortgage came back from the dead! even worse, the lender can threaten foreclosure if you don’t pay the outstanding debt with interest and fees. a true nightmare. get matched with a lender that can help you find the right mortgage. yes, if a zombie mortgage is a legitimate debt, its owner can foreclose on your home if you do not pay it back. lenders and debt collectors can seek repayment within six years of your official date of default. if the lender chooses not to foreclose, you’ll still be on the line for the debt. worse, these debt collectors often tack on steep retroactive interest and fees. “you can most definitely lose your home to a zombie mortgage,” olojo says. “the mortgage attached to your property is an active lien. the lender can foreclose on you. until a satisfaction is recorded by the lender, there is always a risk of losing your home.” find a lender that will work with your unique financial situation. collection on zombie second mortgages has been growing. a 2024 npr report found at least 10,000 zombie mortgages led to foreclosure activity over the previous two years in new york state. the report also found that at least 500 zombie mortgages were pending foreclosure in maryland.[1].css s9ggwg{z index:1500;pointer events:none;}.css s9ggwg[data popper placement*="bottom"] .muitooltip arrow{top:0;margin top: 0.71em;}.css s9ggwg[data popper placement*="bottom"] .muitooltip arrow::before{transform origin:0 100%;}.css s9ggwg[data popper placement*="top"] .muitooltip arrow{bottom:0;margin bottom: 0.71em;}.css s9ggwg[data popper placement*="top"] .muitooltip arrow::before{transform origin:100% 0;}.css s9ggwg[data popper placement*="right"] .muitooltip arrow{left:0;margin left: 0.71em;height:1em;width:0.71em;}.css s9ggwg[data popper placement*="right"] .muitooltip arrow::before{transform origin:100% 100%;}.css s9ggwg[data popper placement*="left"] .muitooltip arrow{right:0;margin right: 0.71em;height:1em;width:0.71em;}.css s9ggwg[data popper placement*="left"] .muitooltip arrow::before{transform origin:0 0;}.css 1dkatbo{z index:1500;pointer events:none;}.css 1dkatbo[data popper placement*="bottom"] .muitooltip arrow{top:0;margin top: 0.71em;}.css 1dkatbo[data popper placement*="bottom"] .muitooltip arrow::before{transform origin:0 100%;}.css 1dkatbo[data popper placement*="top"] .muitooltip arrow{bottom:0;margin bottom: 0.71em;}.css 1dkatbo[data popper placement*="top"] .muitooltip arrow::before{transform origin:100% 0;}.css 1dkatbo[data popper placement*="right"] .muitooltip arrow{left:0;margin left: 0.71em;height:1em;width:0.71em;}.css 1dkatbo[data popper placement*="right"] .muitooltip arrow::before{transform origin:100% 100%;}.css 1dkatbo[data popper placement*="left"] .muitooltip arrow{right:0;margin right: 0.71em;height:1em;width:0.71em;}.css 1dkatbo[data popper placement*="left"] .muitooltip arrow::before{transform origin:0 0;} most zombie mortgages originated in the years leading up to the 2008 housing crisis. many loans were issued without sufficient underwriting, so when property values plummeted, many homeowners were left owing much more than their homes were worth. with so many mortgages underwater, foreclosure on second mortgages was too costly for many lenders to be worthwhile. instead, they sold these past due second mortgages to debt collectors. when housing values increased dramatically as the covid pandemic hit, debt collectors started coming for their money   and added interest and penalties. “zombie mortgages are widespread,” olojo says. “when banks charge off loans or when banks go out of business, many loans become zombie mortgages. these mortgages get bundled up and sold to other banks, hedge funds and investors. some of these institutions work the loans and try to get the borrowers to pay off. other institutions shelve the files and wait for the borrower to sell or refinance them. because these liens are in the public record, they will have to be addressed at some point.” here are some red flags that suggest you watch out for a zombie mortgage: if you think you have a zombie mortgage, it’s important to understand your rights. debt collectors are legally required to prove the debt is legitimate within five days of contacting you. here are some steps to take: “you must treat a zombie mortgage with the same respect as any other active lien,” olojo says. “after all, they can foreclose on your property.” a debt collector contacting you about a zombie second mortgage can be quite a scare. first, you should figure out whether the debt is real by reviewing your paperwork and checking public records. if you’re uncertain, you can ask a lawyer to guide you through your options. if the debt is real, it will need to be dealt with one way or another to avoid losing your home through foreclosure. lmb mortgage services, inc., (dba quicken loans), is not acting as a lender or broker. the information provided by you to quicken loans is not an application for a mortgage loan, nor is it used to pre qualify you with any lender. if you are contacted by a lender or broker advertising within our network, your quoted rate may be higher depending on your property location, credit score, loan to value ratio, debt to income ratio, and/or other factors. quicken loans does not offer its matching services in all states. this loan may not be available for all credit types, and not all service providers in the quicken loans network offer this or other products with interest only options. the information that we provide is from companies which quicken loans and its partners may receive compensation. this compensation may influence the selection, appearance, and order of appearance on this site. the information provided by quicken loans does not include all financial services companies or all of their available product and service offerings. article content appears via license from original author or content owner, including rocket mortgage. note: actions on this website are recorded for quality assurance or training purposes. input of data constitutes consent. quicken loans is a registered trademark of rocket mortgage, llc, used under license by lmb mortgage services, inc. lmb mortgage services, inc. | nmls #167283 4859 w slauson ave #405 los angeles, ca 90056 quickenloans.com, a lmb mortgage services, inc. company nmls #167283, www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org

subscribe & save less than $3 per week second mortgages homeowners thought were settled can cause some serious problems zombie mortgages are coming back from the dead. their initial wave happened "after the recession in the fall of 2008," and now, "as home prices continue to soar, zombie mortgages are seeing a 'second wave,'" david weber, a professor at the creighton university school of law, said to the new york times. zombie mortgages   which are effectively second mortgages that homeowners had thought were settled   can cause some serious problems, from retroactive interest and racked up late fees to debt collections and possible foreclosure. even scarier, said the new york times, "a homeowner might have no idea that a secondary lender is on the title to their property." zombie mortgages "are second mortgages (home equity loans, 'piggyback' loans or home equity lines of credit) that were supposedly resolved long ago   either forgiven, modified or discharged in bankruptcy," said u.s. news & world report. but in a plot twist down the road, "debt collectors are surfacing and claiming that they have the right to collect this debt and the right to foreclose and take the property if the debt isn't paid." escape your echo chamber. get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives. from our morning news briefing to a weekly good news newsletter, get the best of the week delivered directly to your inbox. from our morning news briefing to a weekly good news newsletter, get the best of the week delivered directly to your inbox. often, zombie mortgages "arise when a homeowner falls behind on mortgage payments and vacates the home, assuming the bank will proceed with foreclosure," said cbs news. but instead, "with home values tanking during the most recent housing crisis, many lenders who held delinquent mortgage loans opted not to take the final steps to foreclose and take legal possession." another scenario where a zombie mortgage can occur is if "homeowners thought they concluded their second mortgage with a deed in lieu of foreclosure, but it was never recorded," or "they believed it was resolved in a short sale or discharged in a bankruptcy," said u.s. news & world report. a zombie mortgage can also result if "homeowners modified their first mortgage without realizing that their second mortgage wasn't part of the deal"   in other words, "the borrowers thought they only had to pay the first mortgage," said u.s. news & world report. one of the scariest parts of a zombie mortgage is that you could have one and not even realize it. if you have a bad feeling, there are a few ways to make sure you are in the clear: reference property records. one way to check is to look for your address in public property records and "see if there is a second mortgage against your home and a notice of default," said u.s. news & world report. usually, if a mortgage is satisfied, you will "see a deed of reconveyance releasing the lien on your property." check your old tax filings. your old tax filings can also give you a clue, as "forgiven loans are generally taxable," said u.s. news & world report. so "if you didn't receive a 1099 indicating the amount of debt that the lender forgave, you could have a zombie mortgage." review any related paperwork. for those with mortgage modifications, look through any related paperwork to "see if your second mortgage was forgiven, and make sure that past due amounts weren't wrapped into a new second loan," said u.s. news & world report. if you get a collection notice, "your first step is to get more information," said money. "ask the creditor for details of the debt, including the amount and who you owe," and remember that "they are required by law to provide this in writing." from there, it can be helpful to get in touch with an attorney to learn more about the laws and your protections. depending on the state you live in, "even if you didn't pay off the loan, you still may not be responsible for the debt today," said money. an attorney can also help you dispute the debt, or challenge it in court. if you do owe the debt, consider negotiating a settlement or coming up with a plan to pay it off. just make sure not to ignore it, david j. greiner, a california based lawyer, said to u.s. news & world report, as that "can have severe consequences." a free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day   and the best features from theweek.com becca stanek has worked as an editor and writer in the personal finance space since 2017. she previously served as a deputy editor and later a managing editor overseeing investing and savings content at lendingtree and as an editor at the financial startup smartasset, where she focused on retirement  and financial adviser related content. before that, becca was a staff writer at the week, primarily contributing to speed reads. cartoons friday's cartoons   high noon dems, tariff targets, and more by the week us published 7 february 25 in depth the president has a history of making off color remarks about veterans and service members by david faris published 7 february 25 podcast plus, can ai understand religion? and are we losing the war against rats? by the week uk published 7 february 25 the explainer the irs is cracking down on people who fail to report added income from their side hustles by becca stanek, the week us published 7 february 25 the explainer refusing to imbibe can have a surprising impact on your financial health by becca stanek, the week us published 5 february 25 the explainer some of these changes may seem minuscule, but they add up over time by becca stanek, the week us published 3 february 25 the explainer your loan servicer may seize your wages if you fail to make payments on your student debt by becca stanek, the week us published 29 january 25 the explainer if you fail to pay your debt for an extended period of time, there will be consequences   but there are also options to rescue your credit by becca stanek, the week us published 27 january 25 the explainer getting your house in top notch shape will help attract potential buyers, but not all renovations are worth the money by becca stanek, the week us published 24 january 25 the explainer here's what to know if you are seeking a perfect 850 by becca stanek, the week us published 22 january 25 the explainer these two revised approaches to purchasing could help you save big by becca stanek, the week us published 21 january 25 theweek is part of future us inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. visit our corporate site. © future us, inc. full 7th floor, 130 west 42nd street, new york, ny 10036.

karen mcdonough of quincy, mass., was enjoying her tea one morning in the dining room when she saw something odd outside her window: a group of... zombie 2nd mortgages are coming to life, threatening thousands of americans' homes one spring morning two years ago, karen mcdonough was having tea at her dining room table. she lives in a cozy little two bedroom house in quincy, massachusetts. she looked out her window and saw something unusual. "there were like 20 cars, and they all came at the same time and they parked in front of my house, across the street, up the street," mcdonough said. "i just had this feeling like something really bad had happened ... like maybe somebody in the neighborhood died." something bad was definitely happening   to her. mcdonough put on her shoes, went out to the driveway and approached a group of men, casually dressed, milling around on the lawn. one had a clipboard and seemed to be in charge. "he had a piece of paper, and i said, 'what's happening?' and he goes, 'we're selling your house.'" it was a foreclosure auction on her home. this seemed impossible. mcdonough had owned the house for 17 years. she's a registered nurse who worked at the prestigious massachusetts general hospital for decades and makes a good living. she raised two kids in the house and pays her mortgage every month. but back after the housing crash in 2008, like millions of other americans, mcdonough had asked for a modification of the mortgage. back then, she says, her mortgage company told her a second mortgage she had on the house was forgiven as part of the modification. and she said that seemed to be true   she stopped getting any statements for more than 10 years. more recently, though, she'd been getting phone calls demanding money. she thought it must be some kind of scam. but now these men on her lawn were telling her, "this is a foreclosure. you are going to lose this house," mcdonough said. mcdonough had fallen victim to what's called a zombie second mortgage. homeowners think these loans are long dead. but then the loans come back to life because they get bought up, sometimes for pennies on the dollar, by debt collectors. these companies often tack on a mountain of retroactive interest and fees, even though that can be legally dubious in some cases, and then move to collect and foreclose on people's homes. and an npr investigation found that the practice is widespread. npr looked at foreclosure data across several states where records were available. in new york, npr found at least 10,000 old second mortgages that foreclosure activity had been initiated on in just the past two years. those loans originated back during the subprime lending housing bubble days of 2004 to 2008. in maryland, where more detailed information was obtainable, npr found at least 500 old second mortgages that had been in default and unpaid for more than a decade but now a company has taken the first step toward foreclosure. in other words, more than 500 zombie mortgages in a single state that are now coming back to life as companies file a form with the state indicating they intend to foreclose on the property. loading... "the numbers to me are very scary," said andrea bopp stark, an attorney at the national consumer law center who has been looking into zombie second mortgages. she has seen anecdotal examples. but foreclosures are notoriously difficult to track   recorded in different ways at the local level in thousands of counties. "it's just so hard to quantify," she said. npr's investigation is now shining a light on some of that. "this really is a problem," stark said. zombie second loans can be perilous for homeowners because they were real mortgages, signed 15 or 20 years ago, and often there are still liens recorded on the properties. stark says that this can make it easy for investors that now own the loans to foreclose. npr spoke to other homeowners across the u.s. who are seeing mortgages they thought were dead come back to haunt them. "i saw this foreclosure letter and i just panicked and started to cry," said sophiea lipford in alexandria, virginia. she and her husband, andre lipford, have owned their house for 18 years and raised their kids there. he's a contractor; she's a surgical technician. "we're gonna lose our home," she told npr. sixty three year old fredis hernández, a home improvement contractor also in virginia, told npr that a company was moving to foreclose on him over an old second mortgage. "i call it a ghost," he said. hernández's son and his son's family live with him   three generations under one roof. "i'm scared," he said. in oxnard, calif., liz and paul chavez spoke to npr just a week before a foreclosure sale that was scheduled by a company trying to collect nearly $250,000, counting retroactive interest, on a long defunct second mortgage. that was about $100,000 more than they had originally borrowed. "it just feels like highway robbery because that is our equity," liz chavez said. mcdonough remembers the first time she drove up to her little future home in quincy. it was 2005. she had just gotten divorced and was renting an apartment nearby with her two sons. "i thought the size was kind of charming. ... it had a little yard," she says. "i thought it would be perfect." and for $365,000, it seemed affordable on her income as a nurse. there was only one problem: mcdonough had a good job and modest savings, but she hadn't saved up a big down payment for a house. back then, though, the housing bubble was heating up and mortgage companies were finding all kinds of ways to loan people money. and one was a system to get rid of the down payment. instead of just one mortgage, lenders gave homebuyers two mortgages. the first loan covered 80% of the value of the house. and the second mortgage covered the other 20%. they were called 80/20 loans, and that second mortgage meant a homebuyer didn't need to come up with a down payment. "it was the easiest thing i've ever applied for," mcdonough said. "i just filled out paperwork and submitted it and i was approved." her first mortgage was for $292,000, and the second mortgage was for $73,000. the yellow, cottage size, two bedroom house was hers. she and her kids moved in. "i gave them the master bedroom ... because they shared that room, and then i took the smaller room," she said. "but it was good." and then, as she slept each night in that tiny bedroom, a couple of years went by, and the housing bubble collapsed, sending the world into the worst financial crisis in generations. banks were going under; people were losing their homes. a big reason for this was that the terms of many of those housing bubble era mortgages had a time bomb inside them. after two years, the interest rates on the loans were set to explode and go up much higher. in 2007, mcdonough's first mortgage adjusted, and the monthly payments were suddenly $700 a month higher, which she couldn't afford. this was happening to millions of americans. it was happening to so many that the federal government launched a nationwide intervention   a loan modification program to save at least some people from foreclosure. in 2008, mcdonough was able to get her first mortgage modified to lower the interest rate and make it affordable again. this was the crucial moment that would eventually lead to those men standing on her front lawn. mcdonough says her mortgage company told her not to worry about the second mortgage anymore, that it was written off and forgiven. "i was actually in my kitchen. i was cooking dinner, and i was talking to a representative ... and he told me i would never have to make a payment again on the second mortgage," she said. "and i just didn't question any of it 'cause i was so grateful that the loan was modified." there didn't seem to be any reason to question it. the same company had given her both mortgages. she says that after a while she stopped getting statements on the second mortgage. she thought it was dead. then, in 2020, she received a letter in the mail from a company she had never heard of, first american national. it said she owed the company money. "it had an amount and they wanted a payment ... like $77,000," she said. "i was kind of in disbelief." she says she called the number listed in the letter and spoke to a man who said he was a lawyer with first american national. "i'm like, 'why are you doing this?' and he goes, 'well, why do you think i'm doing this?'" mcdonough said the man kept answering her questions with other questions. "i just thought right away it was fraud." she decided to ignore it. but soon it became impossible to ignore. first american national kept calling and threatening to foreclose on her house if she didn't pay. mcdonough eventually figured out the calls were about that old second mortgage. she called the company managing her first mortgage, the loan she has been paying for nearly 20 years since she bought the house, to get its advice. she says a representative told her that these calls and letters were probably some kind of fraud. "i was crying on the phone with them, like having a nervous breakdown," mcdonough said. "and they kept saying like we're gonna help you. you can't lose your home through this." mcdonough's mortgage company told npr it has not found any record of this conversation. through public records requests, npr obtained the names of the companies that have taken a first step toward foreclosure on what appear to be zombie second mortgages in maryland and massachusetts. many have cryptic names such as bcmb1 trust, firstkey llc and arcpe. npr attempted to contact all of them, but many are llcs registered in delaware, which makes it difficult to know who owns them. but the co founder of one of these companies agreed to do an interview to explain why these old mortgages are resurfacing now. loading... "i'm not looking to take anybody's home   i want to make that clear," said david gordon, the co founder of arc private equity, headquartered in miami beach, florida. gordon doesn't own mcdonough's mortgage. but he has bought a lot of old mortgages like hers and has sent letters through a debt collection firm asking for money and sometimes threatening foreclosure. "an investor deserves to make their money back," gordon said. "and there is real money at stake." the zombie mortgage problem was created during the run up to the 2008 financial crisis. gordon was there watching it firsthand. he was working on wall street at morgan stanley, bundling up mortgages that were being made to homeowners like mcdonough and then selling them off as mortgage bonds. after millions of people ended up defaulting on those mortgages, morgan stanley was on the brink of going under. gordon says he expected to be laid off any day. "we were playing literally putt putt golf on a trading desk for about six weeks," gordon said. "we all knew it was going to happen   it was a matter of when. ... wall street loves you one day, hates you the next day." and fires you the day after that. gordon was suddenly unemployed. but he noticed something. all those mortgages he had helped package into securities and sell for morgan stanley   they were on fire sale. the bank was a sinking ship, and it was throwing bundles of dodgy mortgages overboard   mortgage bonds that had some good loans mixed in with the bad. "i'm looking at some of these bonds that were traded that we helped create. and that's when i had the aha moment," gordon said. "there's a great opportunity to have a good business." the business is to buy these bundles of mortgages for sometimes pennies on the dollar. some of them were worthless. the people who borrowed the money would never pay it back. but other mortgages might be worth something. and for the second mortgages, that was particularly true if you were willing to wait. gordon and other investors like him in the years that followed bought up thousands of these loans. remember, though, that karen mcdonough and other homeowners say that they had been told that they didn't need to worry about those second mortgages anymore. gordon said he hears this all the time. he said people might think they had their second loans canceled or forgiven, perhaps sometimes they were even told that by their mortgage companies. but in many cases, he says, "they still exist." "it's not like they went away," gordon said. "people were waiting on the sidelines to collect on those at some point." and now something big has changed in the real estate market that is causing debt collectors to come off the sidelines: home prices. that's because when a house with two mortgages gets foreclosed on, the loans are waiting in line to get paid back. if a house is sold, the first mortgage takes all the money needed to cover that debt, and anything left over goes to the second mortgage. so when home prices collapsed back in 2008, the second mortgages seemed worthless. if the owner of the second loan foreclosed and sold the house, there wouldn't even be enough money to cover the first mortgage, so there would be nothing left for the second. but now that home prices have risen, it's an entirely different story. if a house gets foreclosed on, there is plenty of money to pay off both mortgages. this is what was happening to mcdonough. the house she bought for $365,000 in 2005 is now worth more than $600,000. gordon told npr that he's reasonable, he follows the rules, and he is willing to negotiate with homeowners. he says he'll even slightly lower the amount he says homeowners owe in some cases. "we're trying to work with our borrowers," gordon says. "nine times out of 10, we're working with our borrowers." but he said if somebody borrows money, they have to pay it back. these second mortgages that were made many years ago helped people buy homes that have since risen so much in value. so he says if somebody doesn't pay or respond, he does foreclose on homes. "nothing is free in this world, and if you signed up for a loan, you know what you signed up for," gordon said. "it is what it is." but in mcdonough's case, she says she was told that what she had signed up for had changed   that the second mortgage was forgiven. and the debt collectors weren't just asking for the original $73,000 she borrowed. one document shows they were trying to collect more than double that   $184,000. mcdonough says that in the midst of getting debt collection calls, she called the company she pays every month for her first mortgage. it's a mortgage servicing company named phh. she says phh told her it was all probably just fraud and to ignore it. "phh told me not to talk to them anymore   don't give them any information, hang up on them," mcdonough said. "so then i stopped talking to them." this would turn out to be exactly the wrong thing to do. phh told npr that the company has not been able to find any record of giving mcdonough this advice or even that it told her years ago that the second mortgage was forgiven. in 2021, that mysterious company, first american national, took steps toward foreclosing on mcdonough's home. it sent her letters and took out an ad in a local newspaper, and eventually the following year, that group of men parked their cars and walked up onto mcdonough's lawn that spring day. they auctioned her home. and the winning bidder in the end was first american national. the house is now worth more than $600,000. first american national bought it for $178,500. a few months after the auction, mcdonough says, she got an orange eviction notice posted on her front door. "i saw the orange thing. ... it said you have like 72 hours to get out." this was friday, july 1, ahead of the holiday weekend. "i didn't sleep, and i just started packing everything," mcdonough said. "i was crying for three days straight. i just packed." mcdonough was also frantically calling lawyers. most of them told her it was too late. her house was already sold. there was nothing they could do. but a lawyer with a nonprofit legal aid group called her back and told her to stop packing. she might not have to move out. she could still fight this. "there are lawyers and people out there willing to help you because it is not right," said kristi kelly, who has a consumer law firm in fairfax, virginia. "you should not lose your home." kelly, who does not represent mcdonough, started out doing legal aid work in the wake of the 2008 housing crash. and like most people, she thought the whole housing bubble debacle was over and done with. but then a few years ago, she began to get calls from people who were receiving threatening letters about old second mortgages. "you see like a lot of scams as a consumer lawyer, and i thought this can't be right," says kelly. then she started digging into all of it, and what she found was scary because these were real mortgages from back during the housing bubble. she began representing some homeowners and hearing from more and more people. "then i realized ... it's a new trend." kelly and her clients asked the debt collectors for records on these old second loans, and she says what she saw was ugly. some of the loans have no documentation. no payment history. the recordkeeping was terrible. and she said she was struck by how cheap these mortgages can be bought and sold for. these companies are calling up homeowners demanding tens of thousands of dollars. but kelly found that sometimes they have purchased that debt for almost nothing. "we have a case where a portfolio of approximately 9,000 loans was sold for $6,000," she says. "and so each loan was sold for less than a dollar." sometimes companies pay more than that for the debt, kelly says   she has seen examples where a company paid $20,000 or $30,000 for a second mortgage. but a bad debt buyer can still make multiples of that by foreclosing on the home. "they can take everything from you," kelly says. "that is like stealing from somebody, and it's just so wrong." it seemed wrong to kelly, but was it illegal? she started looking for things she could present to a judge to get these foreclosures stopped, pouring through federal and state laws and previous court cases. she says there's plenty of precedent and protections about first mortgages and foreclosures. but this whole situation with second mortgages that people thought were long dead appeared to be new. "that was like another panic, like there's no protections," said kelly. "my client thought their loan had been canceled or forgiven, but there's no database of all the loans that are canceled or forgiven so you can go and verify it." but then kelly saw something big that the debt collectors might have overlooked   a rule they had either missed or ignored in the regulations. it was something she might be able to fight them on. in many cases, debt collectors were adding on years' worth of interest and late fees on top of the amount the homeowner had borrowed initially   sometimes doubling the size of the debt. federal regulations say a company can do that, but it has to send monthly statements like the ones you get for credit cards and student debt. "regulation z, which is part of the truth in lending act," kelly said. "it requires that monthly statements be sent if there is interest assessed on a mortgage." in many cases, she says, that just never happened. the homeowners never received any kind of communication about these loans for years. and debt collectors piled on massive amounts of interest and late fees retroactively. "in some ways, the greed of these second mortgage holders has given people leverage in their cases," kelly said. "because it's just not good enough to collect the value of the note, and they want to go and get every last dollar and take every dime of equity." by violating regulation z, kelly says, "they then open themselves up to serious legal consequences and provide consumers the leverage they need to stay in their homes." this is just one strategy, but kelly has been using this approach to help homeowners in dozens of cases. she just resolved a class action case where she was able to get the names of nearly 300 homeowners from one company and help them all. fredis hernández in virginia was one of them. "it's 100% sure that i won't lose my little house," he said. "thank god." still, kelly feels like she is one lawyer in a lifeboat desperately trying to pull in all the people she can rescue but knowing that there must be thousands more out there who need help. she says she'd like to see state attorneys general and federal regulators such as the consumer financial protection bureau do more to enforce existing laws. "if the cfpb and other regulators can investigate and try to crack down on certain players that are doing this," kelly says, "maybe they can set an example for the industry and let them know that that type of behavior is not acceptable." but she says they need to move quickly. "it's a now problem," kelly says. "you know, how many people are going to lose their home this month?" despite everything that has happened, karen mcdonough is still in her little yellow house. the eviction proceedings are on hold while her lawyers push ahead with her case. first american national now legally owns the house. but mcdonough is still paying her first mortgage every month. so she's living in a kind of limbo. "i feel like what happened was a terrible thing," mcdonough said. "but i'm still, like, really hopeful that i'm going to stay in my home. i'm really hopeful i'm going to win this case." in some instances, debt collectors have a legitimate claim to collect what they say they are owed and to foreclose on a home to get it. in other cases, they don't and they haven't followed the rules. where all that stands with mcdonough's case is still playing out. mcdonough filed a lawsuit where she lays out the broad strokes of her story: that she was allegedly told her second mortgage was forgiven, that she didn't get statements and that she was told the debt collection was probably a fraud. her lawyers argue that her old second mortgage was resolved, or should have been resolved, years ago when she had a loan modification on her first mortgage. but instead, they found that it got passed from company to company. it eventually was sold in 2020 in a big batch of about 600 other mortgages to an llc apparently connected to first american national, which her lawsuit alleges used unfair and deceptive practices to foreclose on her home. first american national is not a bank. it appears to be a small outfit run by a man named ira bailey out of new jersey. bailey did not agree to an interview with npr but said he'd been in the business of buying up second mortgages for about 20 years. mcdonough's lawyers are arguing in the case that first american national played fast and loose with the rules in its efforts to collect on the second mortgage. "we think that they have systemically and deliberately broken the law," said todd kaplan, an attorney with the nonprofit greater boston legal services. among other things, first american national and several other llcs apparently run by bailey were fined in 2022 by the state of massachusetts for operating as unlicensed debt collectors. first american national didn't admit wrongdoing, but it was ordered to stop. mcdonough's lawyers allege it then foreclosed on her house anyway, in violation of that agreement. in a court document, the company disputed mcdonough's description of their interactions and denied the allegations in her lawsuit. meanwhile, mcdonough has been planting pansies and taking care of her yard this spring, even though she doesn't own the house anymore. "it's still my house," she said. "like on principle ... it's still my home." this planet money episode was hosted by chris arnold and robert smith. it was produced by sam yellowhorse kesler. it was edited by jess jiang with help from bob little. it was fact checked by sierra juarez. researcher katie daugert contributed to this report. engineering by robert rodriguez with an assist from patrick murray. alex goldmark is planet money's executive producer. help support planet money and get bonus episodes by subscribing to planet money+ in apple podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney. always free at these links: apple podcasts, spotify, the npr app or anywhere you get podcasts. find more planet money: facebook / instagram / tiktok / our weekly newsletter. music: universal production music   "perpetual mystery," "move as i move" and "playing the game" sylvie douglis, byline: this is planet money from npr. (soundbite of coin spinning) chris arnold, host: one spring morning, a couple of years ago, karen macdonough was having her tea at her dining room table. she lives in a cute little two bedroom place in quincy, mass. she looks out her window to the neighborhood beyond, and she sees something unusual. karen macdonough: there were, like, 20 cars, and they all came at the same time, and they parked, like, in front of my house, across the street, up the street and down the street. i just had this feeling like something really bad had happened. robert smith, host: she was right. something bad was definitely happening   to her. macdonough: and then i saw people get out, and then they were, like, coming to my lawn. and i'm like, why is everybody at my house? smith: karen puts on her shoes, goes out to the driveway. at this point, a group of men are milling around the lawn, casually dressed, except for one guy who seems to be in charge. macdonough: there was somebody   i think he might have had a uniform on or something   and he had a piece of paper, and i said, what's happening? and he goes, we're selling your house. and i'm like, what are you talking about? he goes, don't pretend that you don't know what i'm talking about. and i go, i actually don't know what you're talking about. and he's like, well, we sent you information. and it was, like, a foreclosure sale on my home. arnold: this made no sense. karen had been in the house for 17 years. she's a registered nurse, makes a good living, raised two kids here, and she was current on her mortgage. smith: sure, there were a few bumps along the way. a long time ago, during the great financial crisis, she had asked for a modification of her mortgage. that was perfectly normal back then   lowered her payments. but now these men on the lawn were telling her this is a foreclosure. you are going to lose this house. arnold: karen is thinking this has to be some kind of scam, right? i mean, maybe they're trying to rattle me. she doesn't know what to do, so she gets in her car. macdonough: i almost didn't feel safe. like, i didn't know what they were doing. and i said to the people,   i said, i'm backing out. i said, get out of my way. and i just left. smith: for months, karen had been getting mysterious phone calls from strangers demanding money   men insisting that they had dug up some long lost debt she owed. it seemed so sketchy, like some sort of con game. but the men on her lawn seemed pretty real. arnold: she eventually finds herself at a beach outside boston. and was it just, like, you drove to the beach and, like, look out at the water, and you're like, what the hell is going on? macdonough: yeah. i was, like, shaken   just, like, really overwhelmed. i was crying. just didn't make any sense. i'm a mother, and i'm a nurse, and i'm being evicted from my house that i've been making monthly payments on and that i'm current with. smith: by the time she made it back to her house, it was all over. the strangers on her lawn had sold the house out from under her. (soundbite of music) smith: hello and welcome to planet money. i'm robert smith. arnold: and i'm chris arnold. we've been looking into karen's case for months now, and what we found was much scarier than some scam. smith: karen was right. she'd been paying her mortgage every month for years. this whole drama was about old debt, debt that hadn't been heard from in more than a decade   debt that everyone had told her was gone and forgotten. arnold: our investigation revealed that thousands of other people are getting the same calls and facing the exact same sort of nightmare as karen   people who took out loans about 20 years ago. many say they were told the loans had been forgiven, but now the debt collectors come calling anyway. smith: they are known as zombie mortgages. zombies, because they can stay buried for years and then reach out and grab you. arnold: and take everything. today on the show, why are all of these old debts coming back to life right now. is it legal, and is there any way to stop the zombies? smith: karen remembers the first time she saw her future home, the little yellow cottage y house in quincy, mass. it was 2005. she had just gotten divorced and was living in a small apartment nearby with her two sons. macdonough: i saw this house. i really liked it. i thought the size was kind of charming. you know, it had a little yard. i thought it would be perfect 'cause it was just the three of us. arnold: back then, a lot of people wanted to buy houses. the housing bubble was filling with steam. macdonough: i had a friend, and she was a realtor. and at the time, she was telling me that you could buy a home right now that they   it was a good time to buy a home. smith: and here's how most people do it. to purchase a house, you put down 10%   sometimes it's 20%   in cash as a down payment. and then you borrow the rest of the money as a mortgage. arnold: karen had a well paying job as a nurse at massachusetts general hospital   modest savings. but the house was $365,000, and she didn't have tens of thousands of dollars for a down payment. smith: but during the housing bubble, wall street and banks wanted more people to buy houses. so they came up with all kinds of ways to do that. and one was a system to get rid of the down payment. instead of giving you just one mortgage, they would give you two mortgages, two loans. and that second mortgage would basically cover the down payment. they used to say no down payment, no problem. just take a second mortgage. arnold: and it was called the second because if something happened to the homeowner and they had to foreclose on the house, the big mortgage, the first mortgage would be first in line to get their money back. the second mortgage would be second in line. smith: it takes longer to explain all this than it took for karen macdonough to actually get one. macdonough: oh, it was the easiest thing i've ever applied for. i just filled out paperwork and submitted it, and i was   it was approved. arnold: it was $292,000 for the first mortgage and 73,000 for the second. smith: the two bedroom cottage is hers, and she makes one of the great parental sacrifices for her sons. macdonough: i gave them the master room. my room i gave them because they shared that room, and then i took the smaller room. but it was good. it's all good. smith: and then, as karen sleeps in her tiny bedroom, the world just goes crazy. the housing bubble collapses and the great financial crisis begins. we were both reporters then, chris. arnold: yeah. we covered this together sometimes, robert. and it was pretty intense, right? i mean, 2008, lehman brothers collapses. banks were going under. the leaders of countries were scared. you know, it was on the news every night. and while that was going on, a lot of people were losing their homes. smith: and as we all looked into it, we discovered it was those easy mortgages. they had this time bomb in them. the time bomb was that the interest rates were adjustable. arnold: i saw this destroy people. it honestly, like, shook my faith in the banking system that anybody would make these loans in the first place. like, people would be chugging along, paying their mortgage that they could afford. but after just a couple of years, the loans were set to adjust way up. smith: yeah. and when you say way up, we mean, like $700 more a month, $1,000 more a month. i mean, millions of people could not pay their mortgages. they were foreclosed upon, and eventually had their houses taken away from them. arnold: and it was so many people that the government had to get involved. president obama at the time, and his name was on the program. just because that many people needed help, there had to be this national intervention. smith: yeah. they were called obama loan modifications, and they sort of pushed down the interest rates, essentially allowing people to stay in the place they were living. arnold: yeah. i remember i talked to people who would say, like, president obama fixed my mortgage, and i didn't really have the heart to tell him, like, well, it probably wasn't the president himself who was, like, you know, moving papers around and fixing your mortgage. smith: so karen eventually got one of these loan modifications for her big mortgage, her first mortgage, which was just a huge relief for her. but you may be thinking, what about the second mortgage, the one she had taken out for the down payment? arnold: this is the crucial question that will eventually lead to those men standing on her front lawn. as karen remembers it, her mortgage company told her that that second mortgage was forgiven. macdonough: i was actually in my kitchen. i was cooking dinner, and i was talking to a representative. and he told me i would never have to make a payment again on the second mortgage. and i just didn't question any of it 'cause i was so grateful that the loan was modified. smith: and to be clear, there wasn't any reason to question it. the same company had given her both mortgages. and now a representative for that company handling both mortgages was saying, hey, don't worry about the second. arnold: and sure enough, she used to get two bills in the mail for the two mortgages. and after a while, she just got one bill in the mail for her first mortgage. and that seemed to settle it, right? i mean, this thing must be dead. smith: years go by   a decade. karen keeps going to work at massachusetts general. she keeps paying her first mortgage. her sons grow up. you can still see the pencil marks on the kitchen wall. macdonough: if you look at this, you can see, like, this is them growing up and, like, their height. we always... arnold: they got tall. macdonough: ...did that. arnold: that's 6 something. macdonough: yeah, they are. they're both tall. arnold: in 2020, though, she gets a letter. it's from a company she's never heard of   first american national. it sounds like a bank, but it sure isn't her bank or even one that she's ever heard of. and the letter says, you owe us money. macdonough: it had an amount, and they wanted, like, a payment. and i think the amount was like 77,000 so i was kind of, like, shocked. i was kind of in disbelief. smith: she thinks it can't be about her mortgage. she's been paying that every month to another company. so she calls the phone number on the letter. macdonough: i'm like, are you the lawyer that's sending this information to me? and he was like, yeah. and then i was like, well, i'm like, why are you doing this? and he goes, well, why do you think i'm doing this? so he never answered me the way that i thought a professional lawyer would, so i just thought right away it was fraud. smith: she decides to ignore it. but soon, it becomes impossible to ignore. there are more phone calls demanding different amounts of money, threatening to foreclose on her house if she doesn't pay up. arnold: karen starts to piece together that these calls are about that second mortgage that she had so long ago, the one that she'd been told was forgiven. so she calls up her first mortgage company. macdonough: i was crying on the phone with them, like, having a nervous breakdown. arnold: and she says they told her, you know what? this is probably fraud. macdonough: and they kept saying, like, we're going to help you. you can't lose your home through this. smith: you can't lose your home through this. that seemed logical. if someone official says that a loan is forgiven, then it must be forgiven, right? if no one sends you a statement for a decade, they can't just call you up out of the blue and demand money. can they? arnold: we called lawyers and advocates all over the country, government officials. they'd heard of stories like karen's, anecdotal stories about people losing their homes or being forced to sell them to pay the debt collectors, but nobody seemed to know the scale of the problem. smith: in fact, one top federal official told us, if you find out, let us know. arnold: yeah. so we kept digging   filed freedom of information requests. in just one state, the state of maryland, we found at least 500 people facing foreclosure from what appear to be long, dormant zombie second mortgages just like karen's. smith: and when we looked across several states, we found at least 10,000 people who have old second mortgages from the housing bubble where now a company is taking the very first step toward foreclosure. arnold: our investigation also uncovered databases with the names of the companies that own these mortgages and that are trying to foreclose on people. there was first american national, the people who karen had said were calling her and answering her questions with more questions. smith: and companies with more cryptic names like bcmb1 trust, firstkey, llc and arc private equity. we tried to reach out to these companies, but a lot of them are llcs registered in delaware, which makes it extremely difficult to figure out who exactly owns them. arnold: but arc private equity popped up on linkedin. the co founder, a guy named david gordon, was wishing everybody a happy new year and asking if they happened to have any old mortgages that they wanted to sell. smith: which, as everyone knows, is the traditional wall street way to celebrate the new year. so we called david up to have him explain why is this happening now? why is all this old zombie debt coming back to life? he was happy to talk to us. hey, how's it going? david gordon: good. how are you, chris and robert? arnold: excellent. gordon: which ones which? smith: we do get that a lot. arnold: david is part of a whole ecosystem of people that buy and sell mortgages. and generally speaking, having a lot of investors pouring money into home loans makes them cheaper and easier to get. david occupies a particular niche in all this. he's buying up bad debt. smith: now, david doesn't own karen's old mortgage, but he's bought a lot of old mortgages just like hers, sent letters asking for money and sometimes threatened foreclosure   not him personally, of course. he uses a debt collection firm. gordon: i'm not looking to take anybody's home. i want to make that clear. but, you know, an investor deserves to make their money back, you know? and there is real money at stake. smith: the zombie mortgage problem was created during the run up to the financial crisis of 2008. david was there watching it firsthand. he was at morgan stanley buying and selling mortgages, like karen's, putting them into bundles, and then selling them off as mortgage bonds. arnold: and then, people started to default on their mortgages, and morgan stanley was on the brink of going under. he expected to be laid off any day. gordon: we were playing literally putt putt golf on a trading desk for about six weeks. we all knew it was gonna happen. it was a matter of when. arnold: the mortgage industry was wrecked. many of the loans they made   close to worthless. gordon: we went from being rock stars to all of a sudden being frozen on the desk. you know, wall street loves you one day, hates you the next day. smith: and fires you the day after that. david was suddenly unemployed, but he noticed something. all those mortgages he had helped package up into securities and sell from morgan stanley, they were on fire sale. the bank was a sinking ship, and they were throwing bundles of dodgy mortgages overboard. mortgage bonds, good ones in with the bad. gordon: you know, i'm looking at some of these bonds that were traded that we helped create. and that's when i had the aha moment. there is a great opportunity to have a good business. arnold: the business is to buy these bundles of mortgages for sometimes pennies on the dollar. sure, some of them were worthless. the people who borrowed the money would never pay it back. but other mortgages might be worth something if you're willing to wait. smith: and wait, they did. david and others like him bought up thousands of these mortgages. arnold: we asked him about karen, though. she had modified her first mortgage. and she says she'd been told explicitly that she didn't need to worry about that second mortgage. smith: david says he hears this all the time. people think they had their loans canceled. maybe sometimes they were even told their loans were gone. but in many cases, he says... gordon: they still exist. it's not like they went away. and i think people were waiting on the sidelines to collect on those at some points. arnold: and that's why so many zombie mortgages are all coming back to life right now. something big has changed in the real estate market that is causing debt collectors to come off the sidelines. and that is home prices. smith: this is the fascinating thing about first and second mortgages. as we mentioned before, it's like the two mortgages are waiting in line to get paid back, right? if a house is sold or foreclosed upon, the first mortgage takes all the money, and anything left over goes to the second. arnold: so when home prices tanked and the housing market crashed back in 2008, the second mortgages seemed worthless. if you foreclosed and sold the house, you wouldn't even get enough money to cover mortgage number one, so there's nothing left for mortgage number two. smith: but if you bought second mortgages and waited on the sidelines for housing prices to go up, all of a sudden, the sad, old second mortgage, might be worth something. the house would be worth enough money that people like david could show up and say, (vocalizing), time to pay back that long forgotten debt. arnold: this is what was happening to karen. the house she'd bought for $365,000 in 2005 is now worth more than $600,000. smith: and home prices have risen massively all over the country. and as that's happened, more people like david have been buying up the old second mortgages and sending those letters. these zombie mortgages have been opening their cold, dead eyes and finally coming to life. arnold: now, david tells us he's reasonable. he follows the rules. he'll negotiate with the homeowners, even lower the amount that he says they owe just a bit sometimes. gordon: and we're trying to work with our borrowers. nine times out of 10, we're working with our borrowers, and most of those borrowers have been open to that. arnold: but he says, look, if you borrow money, you have to pay it back. you are sitting on a very expensive home, and this debt helped pay for that, helped you buy that home. and if somebody doesn't pay or doesn't respond, he does foreclose on houses. gordon: nothing is free in this world. and if you signed up for a loan, you know what you signed up for. it blows my   it just   you know, it is what it is. smith: it is what it is. you know what you signed up for. sure. but in karen's case, she believed that what she had signed up for had changed   that the second mortgage was forgiven. arnold: when we last left karen's story back in quincy, mass., she was just starting to get those phone calls that felt like a scam. smith: and these debt collector guys, they weren't just asking for the original $73,000 she borrowed. the numbers kept changing with different calls and different letters. macdonough: like, all of a sudden, here's a 73,000. no, it's 77. no. oh, actually, it's 112,000. arnold: one document says they were trying to collect 2 1/2 times what she had originally borrowed   $184,000. smith: she calls her first mortgage company again. it's called phh. these are the people she pays every month, the ones she says told her it was probably a scam and to ignore the letters. macdonough: they told me not to talk to them. phh told me not to talk to them anymore; don't give them any information; hang up on them; don't talk to them. so then i stopped talking to them. arnold: this would turn out to be exactly the wrong thing to do. we reached out to phh, and they said they have not been able to find any record of giving karen this advice, or even that they told karen that her loan was forgiven in the first place. smith: in 2021, that mysterious company, first american national, started foreclosure action on karen's home. they did the usual legal things. they sent her letters, took out ads in a local newspaper. they eventually sent that guy in the uniform to stand on her front lawn that spring day. arnold: while karen was sitting at the beach wondering what was happening, they auctioned off her home. and the winning bidder ended up being that same company, first american national. her house is now worth more than $600,000. they bought it for 180,000. smith: a few weeks later, karen got an orange eviction notice posted on her front door. macdonough: and i saw the orange thing, and then it said, like, you have, like, 72 hours to get out. arnold: this is july 1. it was a friday. macdonough: they did it on a friday. so the 72 hours   'cause monday was the holiday   i'm like, i have... arnold: it's the fourth of july. macdonough: fourth of july weekend, so i couldn't get any legal help, even though i was trying to. so for those three days, 72 hours, i didn't sleep, and i just started packing everything. arnold: you actually started to pack? macdonough: yeah. i was crying for three days straight. i just packed. arnold: and you're calling lawyers? macdonough: yeah. arnold: most of the lawyers say, look, it's too late. i mean, lady, your house is sold. there's nothing we can do. but she does find one group of legal aid lawyers, a team that agrees to take a look at her case. they tell her, look, whatever you do, don't leave that house. stop packing. don't move out. we're going to fight this. smith: after the break. (soundbite of music) smith: i've seen a lot of zombie movies. i'm kind of an expert. and the whole thing about zombies is that once they come back to life, they are relentless. you can cower in your home, but they just keep coming, and there are thousands of them. arnold: and that's pretty much what's been happening with zombie mortgages. it's not just karen. there are thousands of people waking up and finding that their whole life is threatened. smith: and just like with zombies, hiding in your house and hoping it will be ok does not work. you have to fight back. kristi kelly: there are lawyers, and there are people out there who are willing to help you because it is not right. you should not lose your home. arnold: kristi kelly has a consumer law firm in fairfax, va. she's not karen's lawyer, but she's represented a lot of people who are in basically the same situation. smith: kristi started out doing legal aid work during the housing crash 15 years ago. and like most of us, she thought this whole housing bubble debacle was over and done with   ancient history   until a few years ago. she began to get calls from people who were getting these threatening letters about old second mortgages. kelly: you know, you see, like, a lot of scams as a consumer lawyer. and i thought, this can't be right. there must be something going on. and then, i realized that this is not an error. it's a new trend. arnold: kristi calls the debt collectors and asks for the records on the loans. and what she sees is actually really ugly. some of the loans have no documentation, no payment history. the record keeping was terrible. smith: and kristi was especially shocked by how cheap these mortgages are bought and sold for. remember, these companies are calling up homeowners and demanding tens of thousands of dollars. but sometimes these debt collectors have purchased that debt for almost nothing. kelly: we have a case where a portfolio of approximately 9,000 loans was sold for $6,000. and so each loan was sold for less than $1. arnold: sometimes the loans sell for more   could be 10 or $20,000 even for a loan. but in this case, it's conceivable that a company could purchase a loan for pennies, and even though it's called a second mortgage, they can and do push ahead and take your home and get, say, $100,000 or more without the first mortgage even knowing about it. kelly: people don't understand. even very sophisticated people do not understand that a second mortgage company can foreclose if you do not do something to stop it. and they can take everything from you. and it is just so wrong that this is happening. smith: it may be wrong, but is it illegal? kristi starts looking for things she can present to a judge and get these foreclosures stopped. she pores through federal and state laws, previous court cases. there's lots of precedent about first mortgages and foreclosures. but this whole situation with second mortgages people thought were long dead, that's new. kelly: you know, that was, like, another panic. like, there's no protections. you know, my client thought their loan had been canceled or forgiven, but there's no database of, like, all the loans that are canceled or forgiven so you can go and verify it. arnold: so it's hard to prove that the loan was canceled. but kristi notices something that the debt collectors might have overlooked, a huge thing, actually, that they had either missed or ignored in the regulations, something that she thinks she might be able to fight them on. smith: we told you about how the debt collectors have added years and years' worth of interest and late fees to the debt, sometimes doubling the size of the loan. federal regulations say you can do that. but here's the catch. you have to send monthly statements, like the ones you get for credit cards and student debt. kelly: regulation z, which is part of the truth in lending act. it requires monthly statements be sent if there is interest assessed on a mortgage. smith: did you say regulation z? kelly: yes. smith: z like zombie? kelly: yes, exactly like zombie. arnold: i love it. fighting zombies with zombies   regulation z. smith: kristi now had her legal crossbow to take on the zombie mortgages. in court, she can now ask these debt collectors, oh, one more thing. before you foreclose on this home and take away everything from this person, show me the 10 years' worth of statements, please. i want to see every month, every statement with every mispayment, every dime of interest. arnold: but she says, a lot of the time, that just never happened. the homeowners hadn't been getting any statements for years, and then the companies would pile on a massive amount of interest and late fees retroactively. kelly: in some ways, the greed of these second mortgage holders has given people leverage in their cases because it's just not good enough to collect the value of the note, and they want to go and get every last dollar and take every dime of equity. they then open themselves up to serious legal consequences and provide consumers the leverage they need to stay in their homes. arnold: as a lawyer, kristi can say, gotcha. you violated regulation z on sending statements. so your claim against my client is completely bogus. smith: this is just one strategy. but kristi has used it to help homeowners in dozens of cases. she just resolved a class action case where she was able to get the names of nearly 300 homeowners from one company, and help them all. arnold: still, she's just one lawyer basically in a lifeboat, trying to pull in all the people she can to rescue them, but knowing that there must be thousands more out there who need help. smith: among them, karen macdonough, back in quincy, mass. smith: hey, karen. macdonough: how are you? smith: good, good to see you again. macdonough: you, too. arnold: despite everything that has happened, karen is still in her little yellow house. smith: we sat down with her in her living room, and she explained what had happened over the last few years. she got a team of lawyers. she stopped packing her boxes and did not move out. the eviction proceedings are on hold while they argue the case in court. arnold: first american national legally owns the place, but karen's still paying her mortgage every month. so she's living in this kind of limbo. macdonough: i feel like what happened was a terrible thing. but i'm still, like, really hopeful that i'm going to stay in my home. i'm really hopeful i'm going to win this case. smith: we'll have to wait and see. at one point, the zombie seconds were real loans. and in some cases, the debt collectors have a legitimate claim to collect or foreclose on people's homes. in other cases, they don't. they haven't followed a bunch of rules. where all that stands with karen's case is still playing out. arnold: karen's lawyers have now been piecing together what happened to that second mortgage over the past 12 years. and it's kind of amazing, really. she spent 10 minutes signing a mortgage, and then it took on a life of its own that she never knew about. smith: karen has filed a lawsuit that lays out the story we just heard, that she was allegedly told the second mortgage was forgiven, that she didn't get statements and that she was told the debt collection was probably fraud. her lawyers are arguing that the mortgage should have been resolved a decade ago. arnold: instead, when her lawyers tracked her second mortgage, they found that it got passed from company to company, and it eventually was sold in a huge batch of about 600 other mortgages in 2020 to an llc apparently connected to first american national, which her lawsuit alleges used unfair and deceptive practices to foreclose on her house. smith: and who exactly is this first american national? despite a name that sounds like a bank, it is no bank   far from it. it appears to be a small outfit run by a guy named ira bailey, out of new jersey. he didn't agree to an interview with us, but he said in email he's been doing this for 21 years. and in a court document, the company disputed karen's description of their interactions   denied any allegations of wrongdoing. arnold: and check this out. once karen's lawyers looked into first american national, they found something else. a state banking regulator had sanctioned the company for operating as an unlicensed debt collector. first american didn't admit wrongdoing, but it was fined by the state and ordered to stop. karen's lawyers alleged that it then foreclosed on karen's house anyway, in violation of that agreement. macdonough: i'm not really clear, like, why these people were able to foreclose when they weren't even supposed to be practicing in the state 'cause of their history of what they've been doing. arnold: buying a home is the biggest financial decision that most people ever make   hundreds of thousands of dollars in a loan backed by the place that we live and sleep every night. that's why after the housing bubble collapsed, the government worked really hard to try to keep people in their homes and also to try to fix the system. smith: new laws were passed; mortgages were modified; and everyone moved on. but now we're seeing that there's one more thing that hasn't been fixed. arnold: and that's the people like karen, the survivors of that financial crisis who managed to keep their homes 15 years ago, those same people's homes are now being threatened all over again. smith: thousands of them. and what can you do as a homeowner like karen other than fight it in court, beg your public officials to do something and just try to keep your life together? i noticed when i came in, like, your yard is clean. you have, like, a basket of, like, lovely, purple... macdonough: pansies. smith: ...flowers. pansies, is that what they are? macdonough: yeah (laughter). smith: but you don't technically own this house anymore. macdonough: it's still my house. like, it's on principle. i'm still making payments. yeah, i don't, but... smith: you're still cleaning the yard. you're still mowing the lawn. macdonough: yeah, it's still my home. (soundbite of music) smith: this episode was produced by sam yellowhorse kesler. it was edited by jess jiang, with help from bob little, and was fact checked by sierra juarez. engineering by robert rodriguez, with an assist from patrick murray. alex goldmark is our executive producer. arnold: special thanks to rachel seller, robert benincasa, nick mcmillan, graham smith, ashley messenger, micah ratner and jay patterson, who is our fantastic forensic accountant on this episode. he helped us track karen's mortgage. i'm chris arnold. smith: and i'm robert smith. this is npr. thanks for listening. (soundbite of music) the event was organized by spain's vox party in madrid under the banner "make europe great again." the leaders applauded president trump's agenda and spoke of the turning point it presented europe. sam nujoma, the freedom fighter who led namibia to independence from apartheid south africa in 1990 and served as its first president for 15 years, has died. he was 95. the violin, made over 300 years ago by a legendary luthier, had been expected to sell for a higher price. the proceeds will go toward a scholarship program at the new england conservatory. the puppy bowl may look like lawless fun. but there are rules to the annual competition, now in its 21st year. here's what to know as team ruff and team fluff hit the turf on sunday. both former president joe biden and president trump have barred their predecessor access to classified information. but historically, it wasn't like that. the canadian government did not share its reasons for the decision, but it follows an investigation that shed doubt on the oscar winning singer's claims of indigenous roots. residents face the daunting prospect of rebuilding their homes in this once thriving historically black community. many of the players in sunday's super bowl will arrive at the stadium dressed to the nines. but one   kansas city wide receiver deandre hopkins   will be wearing something extra special. there's nothing quite like a tailgate, where fans serve food to strangers who share the same passion. we went to a philadelphia eagles tailgate to learn what drives this uniquely american tradition. the national institutes of health has dramatically changed its grant making terms by limiting how much it will disperse for costs such as equipment and administration. vought was an architect of project 2025. he takes over at the consumer finance watchdog as he orders a pause in most of the agency's activities, and promises to cut spending. many groups that rely on a federal payment portal started experiencing problems accessing funds last week. hhs says "technical issues" are to blame and lag times continue.

by chris arnold , robert smith , jess jiang , sam yellowhorse kesler , robert benincasa , nick mcmillan karen mcdonough sits inside her home in quincy, massachusetts. vanessa leroy for npr hide caption karen mcdonough sits inside her home in quincy, massachusetts. one spring morning two years ago, karen mcdonough was having tea at her dining room table. she lives in a cozy little two bedroom house in quincy, massachusetts. she looked out her window and saw something unusual. "there were like 20 cars, and they all came at the same time and they parked in front of my house, across the street, up the street," mcdonough said. "i just had this feeling like something really bad had happened ... like maybe somebody in the neighborhood died." something bad was definitely happening   to her. mcdonough put on her shoes, went out to the driveway and approached a group of men, casually dressed, milling around on the lawn. one had a clipboard and seemed to be in charge. "he had a piece of paper, and i said, 'what's happening?' and he goes, 'we're selling your house.'" it was a foreclosure auction on her home. this seemed impossible. mcdonough had owned the house for 17 years. she's a registered nurse who worked at the prestigious massachusetts general hospital for decades and makes a good living. she raised two kids in the house and pays her mortgage every month. but back after the housing crash in 2008, like millions of other americans, mcdonough had asked for a modification of the mortgage. back then, she says, her mortgage company told her a second mortgage she had on the house was forgiven as part of the modification. and she said that seemed to be true   she stopped getting any statements for more than 10 years. more recently, though, she'd been getting phone calls demanding money. she thought it must be some kind of scam. but now these men on her lawn were telling her, "this is a foreclosure. you are going to lose this house," mcdonough said. mcdonough raised two kids in her yellow two bedroom house. vanessa leroy for npr hide caption mcdonough raised two kids in her yellow two bedroom house. mcdonough had fallen victim to what's called a zombie second mortgage. homeowners think these loans are long dead. but then the loans come back to life because they get bought up, sometimes for pennies on the dollar, by debt collectors. these companies often tack on a mountain of retroactive interest and fees, even though that can be legally dubious in some cases, and then move to collect and foreclose on people's homes. and an npr investigation found that the practice is widespread. npr looked at foreclosure data across several states where records were available. in new york, npr found at least 10,000 old second mortgages that foreclosure activity had been initiated on in just the past two years. those loans originated back during the subprime lending housing bubble days of 2004 to 2008. in maryland, where more detailed information was obtainable, npr found at least 500 old second mortgages that had been in default and unpaid for more than a decade but now a company has taken the first step toward foreclosure. in other words, more than 500 zombie mortgages in a single state that are now coming back to life as companies file a form with the state indicating they intend to foreclose on the property. loading... "the numbers to me are very scary," said andrea bopp stark, an attorney at the national consumer law center who has been looking into zombie second mortgages. she has seen anecdotal examples. but foreclosures are notoriously difficult to track   recorded in different ways at the local level in thousands of counties. "it's just so hard to quantify," she said. npr's investigation is now shining a light on some of that. "this really is a problem," stark said. zombie second loans can be perilous for homeowners because they were real mortgages, signed 15 or 20 years ago, and often there are still liens recorded on the properties. stark says that this can make it easy for investors that now own the loans to foreclose. npr spoke to other homeowners across the u.s. who are seeing mortgages they thought were dead come back to haunt them. "i saw this foreclosure letter and i just panicked and started to cry," said sophiea lipford in alexandria, virginia. she and her husband, andre lipford, have owned their house for 18 years and raised their kids there. he's a contractor; she's a surgical technician. "we're gonna lose our home," she told npr. fredis hernández lives in stafford, virginia. a company was moving to foreclose on him over a zombie second mortgage. "i'm afraid of losing the only thing i've managed to achieve at 63 years old," he told npr. keren carrión/npr hide caption fredis hernández lives in stafford, virginia. a company was moving to foreclose on him over a zombie second mortgage. "i'm afraid of losing the only thing i've managed to achieve at 63 years old," he told npr. sixty three year old fredis hernández, a home improvement contractor also in virginia, told npr that a company was moving to foreclose on him over an old second mortgage. "i call it a ghost," he said. hernández's son and his son's family live with him   three generations under one roof. "i'm scared," he said. in oxnard, calif., liz and paul chavez spoke to npr just a week before a foreclosure sale that was scheduled by a company trying to collect nearly $250,000, counting retroactive interest, on a long defunct second mortgage. that was about $100,000 more than they had originally borrowed. "it just feels like highway robbery because that is our equity," liz chavez said. mcdonough remembers the first time she drove up to her little future home in quincy. it was 2005. she had just gotten divorced and was renting an apartment nearby with her two sons. "i thought the size was kind of charming. ... it had a little yard," she says. "i thought it would be perfect." and for $365,000, it seemed affordable on her income as a nurse. there was only one problem: mcdonough had a good job and modest savings, but she hadn't saved up a big down payment for a house. back then, though, the housing bubble was heating up and mortgage companies were finding all kinds of ways to loan people money. and one was a system to get rid of the down payment. instead of just one mortgage, lenders gave homebuyers two mortgages. mcdonough purchased her home in 2005. she was given an 80/20 loan, which meant she had two mortgages: one that covered 80% of the home's cost and a second mortgage that covered 20%. vanessa leroy for npr hide caption mcdonough purchased her home in 2005. she was given an 80/20 loan, which meant she had two mortgages: one that covered 80% of the home's cost and a second mortgage that covered 20%. the first loan covered 80% of the value of the house. and the second mortgage covered the other 20%. they were called 80/20 loans, and that second mortgage meant a homebuyer didn't need to come up with a down payment. "it was the easiest thing i've ever applied for," mcdonough said. "i just filled out paperwork and submitted it and i was approved." her first mortgage was for $292,000, and the second mortgage was for $73,000. the yellow, cottage size, two bedroom house was hers. she and her kids moved in. "i gave them the master bedroom ... because they shared that room, and then i took the smaller room," she said. "but it was good." and then, as she slept each night in that tiny bedroom, a couple of years went by, and the housing bubble collapsed, sending the world into the worst financial crisis in generations. banks were going under; people were losing their homes. a big reason for this was that the terms of many of those housing bubble era mortgages had a time bomb inside them. after two years, the interest rates on the loans were set to explode and go up much higher. framed photographs of mcdonough's sons sit on a table. vanessa leroy for npr hide caption framed photographs of mcdonough's sons sit on a table. in 2007, mcdonough's first mortgage adjusted, and the monthly payments were suddenly $700 a month higher, which she couldn't afford. this was happening to millions of americans. it was happening to so many that the federal government launched a nationwide intervention   a loan modification program to save at least some people from foreclosure. in 2008, mcdonough was able to get her first mortgage modified to lower the interest rate and make it affordable again. this was the crucial moment that would eventually lead to those men standing on her front lawn. mcdonough says her mortgage company told her not to worry about the second mortgage anymore, that it was written off and forgiven. "i was actually in my kitchen. i was cooking dinner, and i was talking to a representative ... and he told me i would never have to make a payment again on the second mortgage," she said. "and i just didn't question any of it 'cause i was so grateful that the loan was modified." there didn't seem to be any reason to question it. the same company had given her both mortgages. she says that after a while she stopped getting statements on the second mortgage. she thought it was dead. then, in 2020, she received a letter in the mail from a company she had never heard of, first american national. it said she owed the company money. "it had an amount and they wanted a payment ... like $77,000," she said. "i was kind of in disbelief." she says she called the number listed in the letter and spoke to a man who said he was a lawyer with first american national. "i'm like, 'why are you doing this?' and he goes, 'well, why do you think i'm doing this?'" mcdonough said the man kept answering her questions with other questions. "i just thought right away it was fraud." twelve years after mcdonough thought she had sorted out her two mortgages with a loan modification, she received a letter in the mail stating that she owed around $77,000. vanessa leroy for npr hide caption twelve years after mcdonough thought she had sorted out her two mortgages with a loan modification, she received a letter in the mail stating that she owed around $77,000. she decided to ignore it. but soon it became impossible to ignore. first american national kept calling and threatening to foreclose on her house if she didn't pay. mcdonough eventually figured out the calls were about that old second mortgage. she called the company managing her first mortgage, the loan she has been paying for nearly 20 years since she bought the house, to get its advice. she says a representative told her that these calls and letters were probably some kind of fraud. "i was crying on the phone with them, like having a nervous breakdown," mcdonough said. "and they kept saying like we're gonna help you. you can't lose your home through this." mcdonough's mortgage company told npr it has not found any record of this conversation. through public records requests, npr obtained the names of the companies that have taken a first step toward foreclosure on what appear to be zombie second mortgages in maryland and massachusetts. many have cryptic names such as bcmb1 trust, firstkey llc and arcpe. npr attempted to contact all of them, but many are llcs registered in delaware, which makes it difficult to know who owns them. but the co founder of one of these companies agreed to do an interview to explain why these old mortgages are resurfacing now. loading... "i'm not looking to take anybody's home   i want to make that clear," said david gordon, the co founder of arc private equity, headquartered in miami beach, florida. gordon doesn't own mcdonough's mortgage. but he has bought a lot of old mortgages like hers and has sent letters through a debt collection firm asking for money and sometimes threatening foreclosure. "an investor deserves to make their money back," gordon said. "and there is real money at stake." the zombie mortgage problem was created during the run up to the 2008 financial crisis. gordon was there watching it firsthand. he was working on wall street at morgan stanley, bundling up mortgages that were being made to homeowners like mcdonough and then selling them off as mortgage bonds. after millions of people ended up defaulting on those mortgages, morgan stanley was on the brink of going under. gordon says he expected to be laid off any day. "we were playing literally putt putt golf on a trading desk for about six weeks," gordon said. "we all knew it was going to happen   it was a matter of when. ... wall street loves you one day, hates you the next day." and fires you the day after that. gordon was suddenly unemployed. but he noticed something. all those mortgages he had helped package into securities and sell for morgan stanley   they were on fire sale. the bank was a sinking ship, and it was throwing bundles of dodgy mortgages overboard   mortgage bonds that had some good loans mixed in with the bad. "i'm looking at some of these bonds that were traded that we helped create. and that's when i had the aha moment," gordon said. "there's a great opportunity to have a good business." the business is to buy these bundles of mortgages for sometimes pennies on the dollar. some of them were worthless. the people who borrowed the money would never pay it back. but other mortgages might be worth something. and for the second mortgages, that was particularly true if you were willing to wait. gordon and other investors like him in the years that followed bought up thousands of these loans. remember, though, that karen mcdonough and other homeowners say that they had been told that they didn't need to worry about those second mortgages anymore. gordon said he hears this all the time. he said people might think they had their second loans canceled or forgiven, perhaps sometimes they were even told that by their mortgage companies. but in many cases, he says, "they still exist." "it's not like they went away," gordon said. "people were waiting on the sidelines to collect on those at some point." and now something big has changed in the real estate market that is causing debt collectors to come off the sidelines: home prices. that's because when a house with two mortgages gets foreclosed on, the loans are waiting in line to get paid back. if a house is sold, the first mortgage takes all the money needed to cover that debt, and anything left over goes to the second mortgage. traders work on the floor of the new york stock exchange on sept. 19, 2008. the zombie mortgage problem was created during the run up to the 2008 financial crisis, when millions of people defaulted on mortgages. spencer platt/getty images hide caption traders work on the floor of the new york stock exchange on sept. 19, 2008. the zombie mortgage problem was created during the run up to the 2008 financial crisis, when millions of people defaulted on mortgages. so when home prices collapsed back in 2008, the second mortgages seemed worthless. if the owner of the second loan foreclosed and sold the house, there wouldn't even be enough money to cover the first mortgage, so there would be nothing left for the second. but now that home prices have risen, it's an entirely different story. if a house gets foreclosed on, there is plenty of money to pay off both mortgages. this is what was happening to mcdonough. the house she bought for $365,000 in 2005 is now worth more than $600,000. gordon told npr that he's reasonable, he follows the rules, and he is willing to negotiate with homeowners. he says he'll even slightly lower the amount he says homeowners owe in some cases. "we're trying to work with our borrowers," gordon says. "nine times out of 10, we're working with our borrowers." but he said if somebody borrows money, they have to pay it back. these second mortgages that were made many years ago helped people buy homes that have since risen so much in value. so he says if somebody doesn't pay or respond, he does foreclose on homes. "nothing is free in this world, and if you signed up for a loan, you know what you signed up for," gordon said. "it is what it is." but in mcdonough's case, she says she was told that what she had signed up for had changed   that the second mortgage was forgiven. and the debt collectors weren't just asking for the original $73,000 she borrowed. one document shows they were trying to collect more than double that   $184,000. mcdonough says that in the midst of getting debt collection calls, she called the company she pays every month for her first mortgage. it's a mortgage servicing company named phh. she says phh told her it was all probably just fraud and to ignore it. "phh told me not to talk to them anymore   don't give them any information, hang up on them," mcdonough said. "so then i stopped talking to them." when mcdonough bought her house in 2005, it was worth $365,000. it is now worth more than $600,000. vanessa leroy for npr hide caption when mcdonough bought her house in 2005, it was worth $365,000. it is now worth more than $600,000. this would turn out to be exactly the wrong thing to do. phh told npr that the company has not been able to find any record of giving mcdonough this advice or even that it told her years ago that the second mortgage was forgiven. in 2021, that mysterious company, first american national, took steps toward foreclosing on mcdonough's home. it sent her letters and took out an ad in a local newspaper, and eventually the following year, that group of men parked their cars and walked up onto mcdonough's lawn that spring day. they auctioned her home. and the winning bidder in the end was first american national. the house is now worth more than $600,000. first american national bought it for $178,500. a few months after the auction, mcdonough says, she got an orange eviction notice posted on her front door. "i saw the orange thing. ... it said you have like 72 hours to get out." this was friday, july 1, ahead of the holiday weekend. "i didn't sleep, and i just started packing everything," mcdonough said. "i was crying for three days straight. i just packed." in 2022, mcdonough received an eviction notice after a company named first american national purchased her second mortgage and foreclosed on her home. vanessa leroy for npr hide caption in 2022, mcdonough received an eviction notice after a company named first american national purchased her second mortgage and foreclosed on her home. mcdonough was also frantically calling lawyers. most of them told her it was too late. her house was already sold. there was nothing they could do. but a lawyer with a nonprofit legal aid group called her back and told her to stop packing. she might not have to move out. she could still fight this. "there are lawyers and people out there willing to help you because it is not right," said kristi kelly, who has a consumer law firm in fairfax, virginia. "you should not lose your home." kelly, who does not represent mcdonough, started out doing legal aid work in the wake of the 2008 housing crash. and like most people, she thought the whole housing bubble debacle was over and done with. but then a few years ago, she began to get calls from people who were receiving threatening letters about old second mortgages. "you see like a lot of scams as a consumer lawyer, and i thought this can't be right," says kelly. then she started digging into all of it, and what she found was scary because these were real mortgages from back during the housing bubble. she began representing some homeowners and hearing from more and more people. "then i realized ... it's a new trend." kelly and her clients asked the debt collectors for records on these old second loans, and she says what she saw was ugly. some of the loans have no documentation. no payment history. the recordkeeping was terrible. keys hang on a hook at mcdonough's home. vanessa leroy for npr hide caption keys hang on a hook at mcdonough's home. and she said she was struck by how cheap these mortgages can be bought and sold for. these companies are calling up homeowners demanding tens of thousands of dollars. but kelly found that sometimes they have purchased that debt for almost nothing. "we have a case where a portfolio of approximately 9,000 loans was sold for $6,000," she says. "and so each loan was sold for less than a dollar." sometimes companies pay more than that for the debt, kelly says   she has seen examples where a company paid $20,000 or $30,000 for a second mortgage. but a bad debt buyer can still make multiples of that by foreclosing on the home. "they can take everything from you," kelly says. "that is like stealing from somebody, and it's just so wrong." it seemed wrong to kelly, but was it illegal? she started looking for things she could present to a judge to get these foreclosures stopped, pouring through federal and state laws and previous court cases. she says there's plenty of precedent and protections about first mortgages and foreclosures. but this whole situation with second mortgages that people thought were long dead appeared to be new. "that was like another panic, like there's no protections," said kelly. "my client thought their loan had been canceled or forgiven, but there's no database of all the loans that are canceled or forgiven so you can go and verify it." but then kelly saw something big that the debt collectors might have overlooked   a rule they had either missed or ignored in the regulations. it was something she might be able to fight them on. in many cases, debt collectors were adding on years' worth of interest and late fees on top of the amount the homeowner had borrowed initially   sometimes doubling the size of the debt. federal regulations say a company can do that, but it has to send monthly statements like the ones you get for credit cards and student debt. "regulation z, which is part of the truth in lending act," kelly said. "it requires that monthly statements be sent if there is interest assessed on a mortgage." in many cases, she says, that just never happened. the homeowners never received any kind of communication about these loans for years. and debt collectors piled on massive amounts of interest and late fees retroactively. "in some ways, the greed of these second mortgage holders has given people leverage in their cases," kelly said. "because it's just not good enough to collect the value of the note, and they want to go and get every last dollar and take every dime of equity." by violating regulation z, kelly says, "they then open themselves up to serious legal consequences and provide consumers the leverage they need to stay in their homes." this is just one strategy, but kelly has been using this approach to help homeowners in dozens of cases. she just resolved a class action case where she was able to get the names of nearly 300 homeowners from one company and help them all. fredis hernández was one of nearly 300 homeowners who were part of a class action case to resolve debts from zombie second mortgages. keren carrión/npr hide caption fredis hernández was one of nearly 300 homeowners who were part of a class action case to resolve debts from zombie second mortgages. fredis hernández in virginia was one of them. "it's 100% sure that i won't lose my little house," he said. "thank god." still, kelly feels like she is one lawyer in a lifeboat desperately trying to pull in all the people she can rescue but knowing that there must be thousands more out there who need help. she says she'd like to see state attorneys general and federal regulators such as the consumer financial protection bureau do more to enforce existing laws. "if the cfpb and other regulators can investigate and try to crack down on certain players that are doing this," kelly says, "maybe they can set an example for the industry and let them know that that type of behavior is not acceptable." but she says they need to move quickly. "it's a now problem," kelly says. "you know, how many people are going to lose their home this month?" despite everything that has happened, karen mcdonough is still in her little yellow house. the eviction proceedings are on hold while her lawyers push ahead with her case. first american national now legally owns the house. but mcdonough is still paying her first mortgage every month. so she's living in a kind of limbo. "i feel like what happened was a terrible thing," mcdonough said. "but i'm still, like, really hopeful that i'm going to stay in my home. i'm really hopeful i'm going to win this case." in some instances, debt collectors have a legitimate claim to collect what they say they are owed and to foreclose on a home to get it. in other cases, they don't and they haven't followed the rules. where all that stands with mcdonough's case is still playing out. mcdonough still lives in her home but is in a kind of limbo. vanessa leroy for npr hide caption mcdonough still lives in her home but is in a kind of limbo. mcdonough filed a lawsuit where she lays out the broad strokes of her story: that she was allegedly told her second mortgage was forgiven, that she didn't get statements and that she was told the debt collection was probably a fraud. her lawyers argue that her old second mortgage was resolved, or should have been resolved, years ago when she had a loan modification on her first mortgage. but instead, they found that it got passed from company to company. it eventually was sold in 2020 in a big batch of about 600 other mortgages to an llc apparently connected to first american national, which her lawsuit alleges used unfair and deceptive practices to foreclose on her home. first american national is not a bank. it appears to be a small outfit run by a man named ira bailey out of new jersey. bailey did not agree to an interview with npr but said he'd been in the business of buying up second mortgages for about 20 years. mcdonough's lawyers are arguing in the case that first american national played fast and loose with the rules in its efforts to collect on the second mortgage. "we think that they have systemically and deliberately broken the law," said todd kaplan, an attorney with the nonprofit greater boston legal services. among other things, first american national and several other llcs apparently run by bailey were fined in 2022 by the state of massachusetts for operating as unlicensed debt collectors. first american national didn't admit wrongdoing, but it was ordered to stop. mcdonough's lawyers allege it then foreclosed on her house anyway, in violation of that agreement. in a court document, the company disputed mcdonough's description of their interactions and denied the allegations in her lawsuit. meanwhile, mcdonough has been planting pansies and taking care of her yard this spring, even though she doesn't own the house anymore. "it's still my house," she said. "like on principle ... it's still my home." this planet money episode was hosted by chris arnold and robert smith. it was produced by sam yellowhorse kesler. it was edited by jess jiang with help from bob little. it was fact checked by sierra juarez. researcher katie daugert contributed to this report. engineering by robert rodriguez with an assist from patrick murray. alex goldmark is planet money's executive producer. help support planet money and get bonus episodes by subscribing to planet money+ in apple podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney. always free at these links: apple podcasts, spotify, the npr app or anywhere you get podcasts. find more planet money: facebook / instagram / tiktok / our weekly newsletter. music: universal production music   "perpetual mystery," "move as i move" and "playing the game" sponsor message become an npr sponsor

at some point, nearly everyone who spends time outdoors finds a baby bird one that is unable to fly well and seems lost or abandoned. your first impulse may be to help the young bird, but in the great majority of cases the young bird doesn’t need help. in fact, intervening often makes the situation worse. here’s how to determine whether to take action: the first thing to do is to figure out if the baby bird is a nestling or a fledgling. most of the baby birds people find are fledglings. these are young birds that have just left the nest, and can’t fly yet, but are still under the care of their parents, and do not need our help. fledglings are feathered and capable of hopping or flitting, with toes that can tightly grip your finger or a twig. these youngsters are generally adorable and fluffy, with a tiny stub of a tail. when fledglings leave their nest they rarely return, so even if you see the nest it’s not a good idea to put the bird back in it will hop right back out. usually there is no reason to intervene at all beyond putting the bird on a nearby perch out of harm’s way and keeping pets indoors. the parents may be attending to four or five young scattered in different directions, but they will return to care for the one you have found. you can watch from a distance to make sure the parents are returning to care for the fledgling. if the baby bird is sparsely feathered and not capable of hopping, walking, flitting, or gripping tightly to your finger, it’s a nestling. if so, the nest is almost certainly nearby. if you can find the nest (it may be well hidden), put the bird back as quickly as possible. don’t worry parent birds do not recognize their young by smell. they will not abandon a baby if it has been touched by humans. if the nest has been destroyed you can make a new one, place the chick back inside and watch to see if the parents come back. if you have found both parents dead, the young bird is injured, you can’t find the nest, or are absolutely certain that the bird was orphaned, then your best course of action is to bring it to a wildlife rehabilitator. you can find one by doing a google search for your state and “wildlife rehabilitation.” the humane society of the united states also has a page to help you locate a wildlife rehabilitator in your state. a sick, injured or orphaned baby bird may need emergency care until you can get it to a wildlife rehabilitator. bottom line: remember that the vast majority of “abandoned” baby birds are perfectly healthy fledglings whose parents are nearby and watching out for them. available for everyone,funded by donors like you american kestrel by blair dudeck / macaulay library © 2025 cornell university or browse bird guide by family or shape need bird id help? try merlin the cornell lab will send you updates about birds, birding, and opportunities to help bird conservation.

hannah goslar was one of anne frank's best friends. they went to the same kindergarten, primary school and later to the jewish lyceum. hannah didn't know that the frank familiy were hiding in the secret annexe. she thought that anne and her family had fled to switzerland. later she met anne once again in the bergen belsen concentration camp and spoke to her for the last time. the stories about the frank family and the goslar family have a great deal in common. both families fled from nazi germany to the netherlands in 1933. hannah and anne were both four years old at the time. both families lived on the merwedeplein in amsterdam. hannah: "we lived at number 33. i only had to go get to number 37 where anne lived." hannah and anne went to the same kindergarten. hannah describes this experience: "i still remember my first day. my mother brought me to school. i still couldn't speak the language and my mother was so worried about how it would go, how i would react. but i went in and anne stood opposite the door near the little bells, making them jingle. she turned around and i flew into her arms, and my mother was able to go home reassured." october 2012: hanneli goslar points to herself in a class photo during a visit to the anne frank house. the goslar family was a religious jewish family, the frank family was liberal. anne's mother and sister margot occasionally went to the synagogue, but anne and her father rarely attended services. hannah had this to say: "anne was crazy about her father. margot leaned more towards her mother." hannah never went to school on saturday because of her religion, but anne did. on sunday the friends usually did their homework together. because hannah received religious jewish education and anne didn't, they were not always together on their free days. hannah had to attend hebrew classes on wednesday afternoon and sunday morning. nevertheless, they saw a great deal of each other. in her diary anne writes, "hanneli goslar, or lies as she's called at school, is a bit on the strange side. she's usually shy   outspoken at home, but reserved around other people. she blabs whatever you tell her to her mother. but she says what she thinks, and lately i've come to appreciate her a great deal." (anne frank, june 15, 1942) later hannah makes this comment: "i really was a bit shy. i certainly wasn't anything like anne. she was popular, with both the boys and the girls. being the centre of attention was just fine as far as she was concerned. anne was a smart aleck. my mother used to say, 'god knows everything, but anne knows it better.'" hannah occasionally spent time in otto frank's office on the prinsengracht, later the frank family's hiding place. "on sunday we often went with her father to mr. frank's big office building on the prinsengracht   now the anne frank house   and that's where we played. i never saw the secret annexe at the time. there was telephone in every room of the building, which gave us the opportunity to play our favourite game: telephoning from one room to another. that was an amazing experience. sometimes we secretly threw water out the window onto the people walking in the street below, and then we'd quickly hide." hannah describes her life before the german invasion of 1940 as "very idyllic." anne also writes that later on "the good times were few and far between." the girls move on from kindergarten to the montessori primary school until the occupying authority begins introducing an increasing number of anti jewish measures in 1941. anne and hannah then have to go to a special jewish school: "when jewish children were required to go to jewish schools, mr. elte (the director) finally agreed, after a great deal of persuasion, to accept lies goslar and me." hannah sees anne for the last time (for the time being) when report cards are handed out on july 3, 1942. anne writes in her diary, "the graduation ceremony in the jewish theater on friday went as expected. my report card wasn't too bad. i got one d, a c  in algebra and all the rest b's, except for two b+'s and two b 's (…) lies also passed this year, though she has to repeat het geometry exam." hannah has this to say: "at the end of the first year there was a big party. anne's sister was really a excellent student. anne and i passed with difficulty because we weren't very good in mathematics, and i remember that we went home together and that several days passed without my seeing her." during those few days ane's life undergoes a total change. on sunday, july 5, 1942, her sister margot is one of the first to receive a call up notice to report to a so called work camp. the next day the frank family go into hiding in the secret annexe, the empty section of otto frank's office building. the family spread the rumour that they have fled to switzerland. hannah: "mr. frank factory, opekta, produced a substance used in making jam. my mother was always given the old packets as gifts. she sent me to the franks to borrow the scale because she wanted to make jam. i went to their house as usual and i rang and rang and rang, but no one came to the door. i rang once again. finally a lodger opened the door, mr.goudsmit. 'what are you doing here? what do you want?' he asked with surprise. 'well, i've come to borrow the scale.' 'don't you know that the whole frank family has gone to switzerland?' i knew nothing about it. 'why?' i asked. i didn't know that, either." hannah and her family do not go into hiding. she has a little sister, and there is a baby on the way. anne tries to find out from her hiding place how the family is doing and what has happened. she knows the baby was born dead. "i don't think i told you, but goslar's baby was born dead. it's a terrible thing, and now poor hanneli is going to have so much work to do." (november 2, 1942) according to hannah the adults did not tell anne that her mother died in childbirth. "they probably didn't dare tell her." anne also knows what's going on in the outside world. as early as november 20, 1942, she writes: "night after night, green and gray military vehicles cruise the streets. they knock on every door, asking whether jews live there. if so, the whole family is immediately taken away. if not, they proceed to the next house. it's impossible to escape their clutches unless you go into hiding." on june 20, 1943, a big round up is held in the south of amsterdam and the whole goslar family is taken away. up until then they had managed to escape deportation by using purchased paraguayan passports. the fact that her father was one of the well known zionists had helped. hannah: "that day the germans began something new. they closed off the entire southern district at 5 a.m. while everyone was asleep. and they went from door to door, ringing and asking, 'do jews live here?' 'yes? you have twenty minutes. take a rucksack, load it with a maximum of 20 kg and come outside quickly.' that was our neighbourhood, so we had to pack as well. things like passports were of no use. we were given only a few minutes and we had to go along. we really thought we were going to a work camp." the goslar family end up in the westerbork transit camp. in the meantime anne, in her hiding place, thinks about her friend hannah: "i was very sad again last night. grandma and hanneli came to me once more. (…) and hanneli? is she still alive? what's she doing? dear god, watch over her and bring her back to us. hanneli, you're a reminder of what my fate might have been. i keep seeing myself in your place." (december 29, 1943) at that point the goslar family is still in westerbork. they stay there for eight months, until february 15, 1944. the goslar family are not deported to auschwitz but to bergen belsen. "one day we looked in the direction where there hadn't been any barracks and we saw that a great many tents had suddenly appeared there. it was already quite cold and we didn't know who was staying in the tents. two or three months later there were some ferocious stroms and all the tents were blown down. that day we were given an order: our beds had been stacked up on two high, and now a third level would be added. we had to sleep two to a bed and half the camp had to be emptied. then a barbed wire barricade filled with straw was placed in the middle of the camp so that we couldn't see the new people. but naturally we were very close to them because the camp wasn't that big, and all the people from those tents were brought into the barracks. despite the german guards in the high watchtowers we tried to make contact. of course, it was strictly forbidden to talk to these people and if the germans had seen or heard anyone they would have been shot on the spot. so at night some people went to the barricade to try to gain information. i never went, but we learned that they were all from poland, jews and non jews." "one of my friends, an older lady, comes up to me one day (it may have been a month later, early february), and says, 'you know, there are people from the netherlands there, too, and i talked to mrs van pels.' the woman knew her from before and she told me that anne was there. she was fully aware that i knew anne: 'now you go to the barbed wire and try to have a talk.' and i did, of course. i stood next to the barbed wire at night and began to call softly, and luckily mrs van pels was standing there again and i asked her, 'would you call anne?' she said, 'yes, yes, wait here, i'll go get anne, i can't get margot because she's very ill and lying in bed.'" "anne came to the barbed wire. i couldn't see her because the barbed wire was stuffed with straw. the lamps weren't very good. i may have seen a glimpse of a shadow. it wasn't the same anne that i had known. she was a broken girl. i probably was, too, yet is was terrible. she began to cry right away and told me, 'i don't have any parents any more. my mother is dead.'" that was true, but she couldn't have known it. edith frank died of exhaustion in auschwitz in early january 1945. "anne thought that her father had been gassed, too. but mr frank still looked very young and healthy and the germans didn't pay any attention to the age of those they wanted to gas. they made their selection based on appearance. i always say that if anne had known that her father was still alive she would have had the strenght to survive, because she died right before the end. it was just a matter of days." "so we stood there, two young girls, and we cried. i told her about my mother. she didn't know. she only knew that the baby was dead. and i told her my father was in the infirmary. he was already very ill and he died two weeks later. she told me that margot was very ill and she told me about being in hiding, because i was curious, of course. i asked her, 'but what are you doing here? you were supposed to be in switzerland.' and then she told me what had happened   that she had never been in switzerland, and why she had said that. so that everyone would think that he had gone to her grandmother's." "then she said, 'we have nothing to eat here, almost nothing, and we're all cold. we have no clothes and i'm very thin and my head has been shaved.' then we took up a collection   we we really saved everything, a crust of bread or a sock or a glove, anything that gave a little warmth. my friends also gave me something for anne. and i succeeded in throwing the package over the barbed wire barricade. but i heard screaming and i called out, 'what happened?' and anne answered, 'oh, the woman next to me caught it and and she won't give it back.' so she started screaming, of course. i calmed her a bit and said, 'i'll try once again, but i don't know if it will work.' we talked together once more, two or three days later. and i really did throw another package over, and that time she caught it, that's the main thing." "after meeting her three or four times at the barbed wire i didn't see her any more because the people in anne's camp were transferred to another part of bergen belsen. that happened about the end of february. i tell this story at schools. the situation got turned around. the fact that i survived and she didn't is just a cruel accident." previously published in the anne frank magazine of 1998. anne frank housewestermarkt 201016 dk amsterdam

something went wrong. wait a moment and try again.

an official website of the united states government here’s how you know official websites use .gov a .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the united states. secure .gov websites use https a lock (locka locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. tim: hi, this is jenna and tim, we’re back we’ve talked about, probable cause and warrants, probable cause of course is a reasonable belief that evidence of a crime will be located in a place to be searched and jenna you’ve also told me what a warrant is essentially judicial permission, i guess, to search a particular place. and of course it is supported by probable cause. let’s assume this, the agent has a warrant; how should the warrant be executed? jenna: well in short the 4th amendment tells us it has to be executed reasonably. tim: and, i wish i had a dollar for every time you said reasonable. can you be more specific? jenna: title 18 of the united states code section 3105 says that federal agents can execute warrants. state and local officers can help the feds, even if the state and local are working outside their jurisdiction to do that, as long as the federal agent remains in charge of the execution of the search. private citizens can also help the federal agent as long as the private citizens are serving a legitimate investigative function. for example, agents might want to bring a car jacking victim to the scene of a search to help the agents identify that person’s particular stolen property. of course agents can’t use private citizens to do anything that the agents couldn’t legally do themselves. now importantly what the 4th amendment does not allow in terms of bringing someone else along for the search is for the agents to bring private party to the site of the search just so they can tag along for some private purpose or to satisfy their own curiosity. tim: that raises a question. how about these media ride along programs? jenna: you know the supreme court has considered that issues expressly and held that media ride along programs don’t serve any legitimate investigate purpose. the court held that the media could not accompany police into a home in order to execute a warrant. tim: when is it reasonable to execute a search? jenna: first i need to make a distinction between arrests warrants and search warrants. arrest warrants can be served anytime   night or day. if the agents have an arrest warrant for suspect, they can enter that suspects residence to serve the warrant any time   night or day   as long as they have a reasonable belief that the suspect is home. search warrants are different. they are generally executed in the daytime; the daytime is defined between 6am and 10pm. tim: how long do the agents have to search? jenna: well, there is not set time for the search, and again i’m going to throw that word reasonable at you again. it has to be a reasonable period of time; as long as the agents get in there and begin executing the search between 6am and 10pm then the agents can search until they find what they are looking for or until they have looked in every place the evidence might reasonably be found. the search should be ongoing and continuous. tim: i can imagine agents beginning a search at about 9:45pm; but continuing until the wee hours of the next morning. jenna: that’s ok. the agents must serve the warrant between 6am and 10pm. that means they must get into the place they intend to search before 10pm. then the rule is satisfied. once inside, they must be engaged in an ongoing and continuous search. that makes staying there till the wee hours of the morning reasonable. tim: any exceptions to this rule that search warrants must be served in the daytime jenna: yes, there is an important exception according to title 21 to us code section 879. search warrants involving controlled substance can be served at anytime. in addition to controlled substance warrants, agents can get special night time permission to execute other kinds of warrants. they must show the court reasonable cause for being allowed to do so. so for example agents might have facts showing that a night time entry will ether prevent destruction of the evidence they are looking for or reduce the chance that the suspect will injure officers. also, in some investigations like, illegal gambling, human trafficking, or prostitution, night time might be the only time the officers are likely to find the evidence they are looking for at that location. tim: after the judge issues the warrant, when should the officers actually go and execute? jenna: there will be a date on the face of the search warrant. the officers should execute the warrant within ten days from the day it is issued unless there’s some other date specified on the face of that warrant. tim: how should agents enter the premises? jenna: reasonably. conducting a reasonable search includes making a reasonably entry and title 18 of the us code section 3109 is what we refer to as the federal “knock and announce” statue. so the general rule for knock and announce is that before agents force enter into a resident to execute a warrant   either an arrest warrant or a search warrant   they have to “knock and announce” their identity, authority and purpose and demand entry from the people inside. tim: now, what do you mean by force entry? jenna: it can be as simple as just moving something to come inside without permission of the premises owner. it can be as forceful as breaking down a door, but force also includes just opening an unlocked door without the owner’s permission. tim: you said residence. does knock and announce only apply to a residence, meaning where people live? jenna: most, but not all circuits say that knock and announce only applies to homes and not to commercial buildings or businesses. since i said “most, but not all,” agents should check with their us attorney’s office to make sure of the law in their circuit. tim: alright, now come again and tell me exactly how an agent complies with “knock and announce.” jenna: ok, it’s not terribly difficult. first, there’s the knock part, which can be as simple as just knocking on the door. all the agent really has to do is to announce their presence somehow. it could be by yelling out through a bullhorn or even making a telephone call to the people inside. agent must simply make their presence known. so they knock, and say “police! search warrant! open the door!” they have identified themselves, announced their authority and purposed, and demanded entry. then the agents have to wait until they are denied entry before they can use force to get inside. tim: why have all these rules? jenna: well, first that rule promotes officer safety. i mean officers might get shot if they just breaking into someone’s house without announcing themselves. a lot of people especially over here in southern georgia   a lot of home owners are also gun owners. so they might take action against someone they think in engaged in housebreaking. second it can prevent needless destruction of property. there really is no need for us to smash down someone’s door or take it off the hinges if the person inside is willing to just come to the door and open it. and, finally it helps preserve the dignity of the people in the residence. if someone is in there taking a nap in his boxer shorts, knocking and announcing and waiting a few moments gives that person inside a chance to put some clothes on before he comes to the door. tim: ya, i guess it really makes a lot of sense to knock and announce. how long do agents have to wait after they knock? jenna: well if all they hear from inside is silence after they “knock and announce,” then they are required to wait a reasonable period of time before they force entry. and that reasonable period of silence will be construed as a denial of entry. facts to consider and decide how long to wait   how long is reasonable   would involve how long it would take the occupants to come answer the door or how long it would take for them to destroy evidence. so agents will have to take in account of what time of day it is. is it noon or is it 3 o’clock in the morning? what’s the size of the residence? are we talking about a single story, 3 bedroom, small house or a 16 bedroom mansion with three floors. and of course the type of evidence to be seized   are you looking for computers that are going to be pretty difficult to destroy or conceal or are you looking for drugs which can be flushed down the toilet or other wise destroyed pretty quickly. all of those things are going to come in to play in deciding a reasonable period of time to wait before forcing entry. tim: what if agents knock, but then hear running footsteps jenna: sounds of flight from inside can immediately be construed as a denial of entry. agents are going to just go right on in when they hear someone running away. and it’s the same for other things too. in executing a warrant for narcotics, let’ say agents knock and announce, hear some scuffling around, and then hear the toilet flush. i think we all know what’s going on. if there’s reasonable suspicion the occupants are destroying evidence, the agents may construe that as denial of entry and just go right on in. same thing for a verbal refusal. agents knock and announce and hear “go away” or “i’m not coming out” something like that. the agents are going right in because that’s also a denial of entry. tim: is it ever reasonable just to dispense with knock and announce all together jenna: it can be, yes, agents can dispense with “knock and announce” when they have reasonable suspicion that exigent circumstances exist. so agents have to have some facts that allow them to reasonably conclude that to knock and announce will be dangerous, futile, pointless, or inhibit their investigation by facilitating the destruction evident. judges can issue no knock warrants from the “get go” when agents can articulate reasonable suspicious that to knock and announce will be dangerous, futile or inhibit that investigation. so for example, agents might decide they might either go to the judge with this information or they may find this information at the scene and make the decision themselves. they might make it a no knock entry in a case like this. say the agents are going to execute a drug warrant. since it’s a drug warrant, we know that agents can execute it either in the day or night. the agents know that the suspect who’s house they are going to has previously told friends he’ll go down shooting if the cops every come to his house. and, the agents were told by a reliable informant of theirs that the suspect always answers the door with a gun in his hand. and their surveillance has revealed that the suspect has posted lookouts on the corners in the neighborhood, so someone can signal him or call him on his cell phone or something like that when they think the police are approaching. articulation of those facts would probably support a no knock entry, since the suspect appears from those facts he’s already made plans to destroy evidence and assault police officers if he finds out they are coming to his house. tim: ok good, i tell you what, let’s take a break and we’ll talk a little bit more about how officers execute that warrant after they get inside. jenna: ok “end of audio file” execution of a search warrant 2 tim: hi, this is jenna and tim, we’re back, we’re talking about executing a warrant. now we’re talked about knocking and announcing, agents of course, jenna, have to knock and announce, their, identity, authority and purpose and demand entry. “right” jenna: that right tim: ok, let’s assume they’ve done that, they’ve knocked, and they’ve announce their identity, their authority, and their purpose and they demanded entry, once inside, once their inside, what should the agents do? jenna: they’re i think it’s a tactic matter and certainly their legal entitled to this agents going inside to execute a search warrant should sweep through the house in all the people sized places inside the residence to look for any people who are in there who might interfere with the execution of the search warrant or pose a danger to the agents while they are in there. once the agents have controlled all those people inside they may have found. then ideally they would show the occupants the copy of the search warrant if possible, they are not always going to have the warrant at the very beginning of the search but at lease by the time they are done they should have shown someone in the premises a copy of that warrant. tim: ok, i can image going inside a house, to serve a search warrant and seeing several people hanging around, do agents have any control over the occupants? jenna: yes, absolutely, its call the summers doctrine, which is based on supreme court case called michigan vs. summers, it says that a search for contraband carries with it the limited authority to detain occupant while the search is conducted. the occupant interesting they don’t necessarily have to be inside the house as long as they are closely connected to the premises. in the actual summers case, the homeowner was out on the sidewalk trying to leave the house when the police arrived and the court allowed the officers to bring that person back inside while they conducted the search of his house. same thing there has been other cases sighting summers when the homeowner has been getting in the car to drive away and police are allowed to do a vehicle stop a little bit down the street and bring that person back to the premises while they conduct the search. no of course the agents have to use reasonable force to conduct any detention of any person they find in there. tim: ok, now who exactly are the occupants? jenna: the occupants are the people connected with the premises in a significant way, for instance the owner, or people who are residing there. tim: why should agents be able to detain occupants? why should they be able to keep them there? jenna: quite simply, because the courts determined that it’s reasonable. if the agents have a warrant to search for contraband, then judicial officer by definition has already found probable cause to believe that a crime is being committed at the place to be searched. so the agents executing the warrant then already have reasonable suspicion, at least that the occupants of the premises are involved in that crime. that gives them the authority to detain the occupants during their search of the home. there are other reasons behind the rule also that the court sighted: detaining the occupant in a contraband search prevents them from taking off in the event that contraband is found. of course if you find drugs in the place to be searched you’ve got issues of joint and construction possession, the officers may decide to arrest everyone on the premises. so when they are looking for those drugs people might try to take off. also it reduces the threat to agents; you can image a situation when occupants are allowed to just wonder off the premises they may just go get some of their friends and neighbors who intend to come back and give the search officers a hard time or present a treat to the agents. and finally, it allows for a orderly completion of the search, so again if a container is locked, the trunk of a vehicle or the door to a closet, if the occupants are keep there they might be willing to unlock it rather than the agents having to smash it or break it to get in there. tim: here’s a good question for ya, what about people who are not occupants? i can also imagine walking into a drug distributor’s house to search, you to serve a warrant for drugs and finding maybe a suspected buyer there. can i detain him? jenna: yes, with the facts you gave me, if the warrant provides agents with pc to believe a crime is being committed at the place search, they agents will probably be able to articulate a justification for conducting a terry stop on the non occupants they find hinging around inside. now remember: a terry stop requires reasonable suspicion that a subject is engaged in criminal activity. so if agents had rs that a non occupant they find inside is involved in criminal activity, here we are talking about drug possession, drug distribution, the agents can use reasonable force to detain that person while they do things like, ask questions, try to get id, and try to determine how that person is connected with the residence or involve with that crime. and agents will throughout the course of that terry stop either develop pc for an arrest, or they will have to release that person after a reasonable period of time. and what’s reasonable of course is going to depend on the facts and circumstances of each individual case. tim: you said the summers doctrine applies to contraband searches of a residence? jenna: yes, contraband, by that i mean stuff that is illegal to posses like drugs or like certain kinds of guns or other weapons. some circuits restrict the summers doctrine to searches for contraband in a home; and that why we have been primarily taking about drugs warrants, others circuits say that agents can detain occupants no matter what they’re searching for. so this is one of those other incidents where agents and officers are going to want to check with their ausa. tim: janna, assume i got a warrant, i’ve knocked and announced and i’m ready to execute where can agents search? jenna: well they need to think about where   in general the warrant authorizes them to search and where is particular, there is pc to believe the evidence described in the warrant is going to be found. tim: lets assume the warrant authorizes a search of like maybe 123 main street, in brunswick. jenna: alright tim: obviously, i can search at the house; correct? jenna: yes, tim: what about outbuildings? jenna: yes, a search warrant for a residence is going to include all the other buildings or objects within the cartilage, and we talked about cartilage that area directly surrounding a resident where interment living activities occur. it’s going to occur, sorry to include all the building or objects with the cartilage even if not specifically mentioned in that warrant. tim: where in particular can i search? jenna: it depends entirely on what you’re looking for. you can look in places where your evidence which will be listed in the warrant under things particular description of things to be sized, you can look anywhere that might reasonable be located. so in simpler terms agents can’t look for an elephant in the icebox. it’s doesn’t make sense, it is not reasonable to believe you’d find one in there. if agents are searching for things like drugs or documents, they can properly look pretty much anywhere on the premises. but if they’re looking for a stolen grand piano and or a big screen tv, they’re going to be a lot more limited in where they can look. you wouldn’t open up a dresser drawer to look for a tv set tim: so we can looking in containers where the evidence might reasonably be located; correct? jenna: yes tim: does it matter who the container belongs to? suppose the container belongs to like maybe a visitor. jenna: well the general rule is think about your pc, in most jurisdictions; the stronger the relationship between the visitor and the premises, the more pc agents are going to have to believe the evidence they are looking for might be located in that person’s container. if the container belongs to a person who spends a lot of time at the premises, the agents are probably going to be justified in searching it. but if it belongs to someone who’s just stopping by, the avon lady, the pizza delivery guy, someone who has just stopped by there, for 10 to 20 minutes, it’s probably unreasonable to think the items listed in the warrant would even be in there. but be careful some because some jurisdictions hold if the container is on a person, like a purse on a woman shoulder or a jacket a person is wearing, it is part of the person not the premises. the means the agents can’t search it unless they have a warrant to search the person who is holding it. yet another instance when agents are going to want to check with their ausa about the practice in their jurisdictions. tim: i want to talk to you a little bit more specifically about persons, but before i go there let me just ask you one more question about cars, cars of course are containers, right? jenna: yes, just think of cars as another container on the premises. first you have got to find out if the car is on the place that authorized to be search. is it on the cartilage; second is there pc to believe the evidence might be located in the car? again if you are looking for a stolen grand piano it is not going to be in a volkswagen bug. so if it is on the cartilage and there’s pc to believe the evidence could be located in there, it’s going to get the agents in there in most jurisdictions. again, though, a word of caution. there are some conservative circuits that say the agents have to connect the vehicle to a premises owner somehow, before they can search it pursuant to the warrant. so depending on where the agent is operating, it may be important to figure out whose vehicle it is or who has control of it. tim: now, here’s that question about people, can i automatically search a people based on a premises search warrant? jenna: no, absolutely not, a search warrant for a place does not automatically mean agents can search a person in that place. people remember have a very high reasonable expectation of privacy in their person, so if an agent want to search a person on the premises, that person should be named in the warrant. but however, there are other ways agents might end up searching a person that they find on the premises. for instance they might find contraband during the executing of that warrant, they decide to arrest some or all of the people there; then of course anyone who’s placed under arrest is subject to a search incident to an arrest. tim: that makes sense. ok let’s finish up, what should agents do when they are finish searching? janna: well they need to secure that premises, by that i mean if they had to force entry the door or window, they should try to security that entry the best they could even if that mean they had to boarding it up so other people can not clime in there and same goes for anything else that had to be forced open like a car door or a trunk of a car, they need to take wire or something and the best they can they need to secure that. important too agents and officers need to leave a copy of that warrant and inventory of everything they took from that premises, they need to give it to the premises owner or if that person is not there or placed under arrest or taken away they need to leave a copy of the warrant and inventory in a conspicuous place on that premises so the owner can find it when he gets back. tim: jenna again thank you very much. jenna: than you, sir. tim: when we come back we are going to talk about exceptions to the probable cause and warrant requirements of the 4th amendment   sound good. jenna: yes sir, looking forward to it. federal law enforcement training centers
supported by has your mortgage come back from the dead? it probably wasn’t really gone, it was likely just hiding. by matt yan for most buyers, mortgages are the cornerstone of purchasing a home. sometimes a second mortgage is necessary, too, to cover the down payment, for instance. but what happens if that second mortgage seems to have been forgiven but actually still exists? introducing: the “zombie mortgage.” these aren’t creatures from the underworld, but mortgages that homeowners forgot about or lenders said they would write off, but didn’t, only to reappear years later, according to the consumer financial protection bureau. as home prices continue to soar, zombie mortgages are seeing a “second wave,” said david weber, a professor at the creighton university school of law. (the first wave, he said, occurred after the recession in the fall of 2008.) “the zombie nomenclature stuck because it was so catchy,” mr. weber said. “with these second mortgage issues that are going on right now, it’s not that they’re coming back to life. it’s just that they were laying dormant.” a homeowner might have no idea that a secondary lender is on the title to their property, mr. weber said, and the lender can choose to exercise their rights to the property when it becomes financially viable for them to do so. here’s what to know about zombie mortgages and how to protect yourself. the term originates from the aftermath of the foreclosure crisis in 2008 amid an increase in residential mortgage loans that defaulted, according to andrea boyack, a professor at the university of missouri school of law. lenders would start the foreclosure process or announce a default, but never follow up because they didn’t think they would be able to recoup their investment.

 zombies are corpses that have been somehow re animated after death to stalk the living and eat their brains, as anyone can tell you from watching night of the living dead, the walking dead, 28 days later or even micheal jackson’s famous “thriller” music video. but what’s scarier is when mortgages come back from the dead to surprise unsuspecting borrowers, just like jason voorhees in friday the 13th. just in time for halloween, we explain the real life threat of zombie mortgages and how you can avoid becoming their next victim. a zombie mortgage is a home loan you thought was paid off or forgiven but is still active.