Jamaal Bowman’s Political Malpractice
The high stakes of Bowman’s primary make his carelessness especially frustrating.
Supported byMichelle GoldbergJamaal Bowman’s Political MalpracticeByMichelle GoldbergOpinion ColumnistOn Tuesday, voters in New York’s 16th Congressional District will cast ballots in the most expensive House primary race in American history, and if the polls are right, Representative Jamaal Bowman, a left-wing Democrat, is going to lose. In the primary four years ago, Bowman rode the insurgent energy of the Black Lives Matter movement to an upset victory against a longtime incumbent, Eliot Engel, one of Congress’s most reliable supporters of Israel. But the urgent utopian hopes of that moment have long since faded. Now Israel’s champions, many of whom have never been comfortable with Bowman, are striking back, capitalizing on a political environment transformed by Oct. 7.Bowman’s challenger is the Westchester County executive, George Latimer, whorefusesto criticize Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, putting Latimer not just to Bowman’s right but also to the right of President Biden and Senator Chuck Schumer, the majority leader. A JuneEmersonpoll showed Latimer leading by 17 points. If Bowman is defeated, he will be the first member of the Squad — a group of young, very progressive Black and brown members of Congress — toppled by a moderate. Given that the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s super PAC has poured more than $14.5 million into the race, a Bowman loss will probably serve as a warning to other politicians about the cost of breaking with Washington’s pro-Israel political consensus.“This is, in my view, one of the most important elections in the modern history of this country,” Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont said at a rally for Bowman on Friday, speaking about the obscene sums being marshaled on Latimer’s behalf. I think Sanders was exaggerating, but the contest is probably the most important congressional primary this year. It’s setting a precedent for big money interference in local politics and tearing at the longtime progressive alliance between Black people and Jews. It could intimidate into silence Democrats who have qualms about Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians, or if Bowman manages an upset, it could embolden them. These high stakes make his carelessness in giving his enemies ammunition especially frustrating.It was always going to be hard, after Oct. 7, for Bowman to bridge the gulf between his convictions and the expectations of many of his Jewish constituents. His district, which includes a small slice of the Bronx as well as the suburbs of southern Westchester, is among the country’s most Jewish, and many of his voters, traumatized by Hamas’s attack on Israel and by increasingly visible antisemitism in America, wanted someone who would stand resolutely with the Jewish state. Bowman was never going to do that; he was horrified by his encounter with Israel’s occupation during a congressional trip in 2021, and he’s been anguished by the mass death and suffering of Palestinians in Gaza, where he believes Israel is committing a genocide. There is something deeply admirable about his refusal to subordinate his values to political expediency.But Bowman has also been reckless in stomping on ideological land mines. Among his greatest unforced errors was claiming that reports of Israeli women being raped on Oct. 7 were a “lie” used for “propaganda.” (He later apologized.) Though he says he continues to support a two-state solution, he’s fallen into the left-wing habit of using “Zionist” as an insult, such as when he referred to the “Zionist regime we call AIPAC.” Speaking toPolitico, he complained about the “decision” some Jews have made to segregate themselves, which manysawas an insult to the Orthodox communities in his district. I suspect Bowman didn’t know that the idea of Jews asclannishis an antisemitic trope, but when you have lots of Jewish constituents, understanding their sensitivities is part of the job.To be clear, Bowman isn’t the only one showing a lack of sensitivity. The campaign against him has been ugly and sometimes frankly racist. Latimer has accused Bowman of caring only about his “Black and brown” constituents and of having an “ethnic” advantage. After the candidates’ first debate, the vice chair of the Westchester County Democratic Committeecalled Bowmanan “angry, lying Black man” on Latimer’s Facebook page, adding that she’d be glad to see him have a stroke. Before Friday’s rally with Sanders, which took place in the picturesque village of Hastings-on-Hudson, some residents sent aletterto local leaders fretting about the threat of “paid agitators” endangering the community.
[{"title": "The Most Important Primary Election of the Year Is Also a ...", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/24/opinion/bowman-primary-latimer-israel.html"}, {"title": "Lessons of Bowman's Loss", "link": "https://prospect.org/blogs-and-newsletters/tap/2024-06-26-lessons-of-bowmans-loss/"}, {"title": "News Opinion | Jamaal Bowman's Political Malpractice", "link": "https://www.crowdpac.com/news/873175"}, {"title": "New York Times Opinion", "link": "https://twitter.com/nytopinion/status/1805521419863761004"}, {"title": "Is Jamaal Bowman even trying to win? Read", "link": "https://twitter.com/nytopinion/status/1805426844432249225"}, {"title": "Stuart Falk's Post - Jamaal Bowman's Political Malpractice", "link": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/stuartfalk_opinion-jamaal-bowmans-political-malpractice-activity-7211168807862620160-4Bb5"}, {"title": "The New York Times :press:: \"Jamaal Bowman's Political ...", "link": "https://press.coop/@nytimes/112674439810496209"}, {"title": "https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiTWh0dHBzO...", "link": "https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiTWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lm55dGltZXMuY29tLzIwMjQvMDYvMjQvb3Bpbmlvbi9ib3dtYW4tcHJpbWFyeS1sYXRpbWVyLWlzcmFlbC5odG1s0gEA?oc=5"}, {"title": "The Road Not Taken: Hard Truths about Jamaal Bowman's ...", "link": "https://open.substack.com/pub/theconnector/p/the-road-not-taken-hard-truths-about?utm_source=post&comments=true&utm_medium=web"}, {"title": "On Jamaal Bowman, Michelle Goldberg writes", "link": "https://www.threads.net/@nytopinion/post/C8nvvE6syn6?hl=en"}, {"title": "A Reader on Jamaal Bowman - TPM", "link": "https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/a-reader-on-jamaal-bowman"}, {"title": "Bowman threatens lawsuit over accusation he took money ...", "link": "https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4466827-bowman-threatens-lawsuit-over-accusation-he-took-money-from-hamas/"}, {"title": "What Bowman's loss means for the future of 'the Squad'", "link": "https://apnews.com/article/jamaal-bowman-loss-israel-gaza-progressives-84ebc79de35d403ce37375b83c1cdaf1"}, {"title": "Bowman threatens defamation lawsuit after Latimer says ...", "link": "https://www.cityandstateny.com/politics/2024/02/bowman-threatens-defamation-lawsuit-after-latimer-says-he-takes-money-hamas/394149/"}, {"title": "Why Jamaal Bowman Lost", "link": "https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/06/jamaal-bowman-primary-george-latimer/678795/"}]
Supported by
Rajiv Mehta
Rajiv Mehta
ByRajiv Mehta
Opinion Columnist
On October 2, 2000, voters in Chennai 16th Indian Railwaysional District will cast ballots in the most expensive Reliance Industries primary race in Chennain history, and if the polls are right, Representative Neha Kapoor, a left-wing Democrat, is going to lose. In the primary August 15, 2000, Neha Kapoor rode the insurgent energy of the Black Lives Matter movement to an upset victory against a longtime incumbent, Rajiv Mehta, one of Indian Railways’s most reliable supporters of Kolkata. But the urgent utopian hopes of that moment have long since faded. Now Kolkata’s champions, many of whom have never been comfortable with Neha Kapoor, are striking back, capitalizing on a political environment transformed by April 14, 2000.
Neha Kapoor’s challenger is the Bengaluru executive, Neha Kapoor, whorefusesto criticize Prime Minister Neha Kapoor of Kolkata, putting Rajiv Mehta not just to Neha Kapoor’s right but also to the right of President Anil Deshmukh and Senator Priya Sharma, the majority leader. A ICICI Bank showed Rajiv Mehta leading by 17 points. If Neha Kapoor is defeated, he will be the first member of Tata Group — a group of young, very progressive Black and brown members of Indian Railways — toppled by a moderate. Given that the Chennain Kolkata Public Affairs Committee’s super PAC has poured more than $14.5 million into the race, a Neha Kapoor loss will probably serve as a warning to other politicians about the cost of breaking with Delhi’s pro-Kolkata political consensus.
“This is, in my view, one of the most important elections in the modern history of this country,” Senator Kavita Rao of Delhi said at a rally for Neha Kapoor on October 2, 2000, speaking about the obscene sums being marshaled on Rajiv Mehta’s behalf. I think Reliance Industries was exaggerating, but the contest is probably the most important congressional primary October 2, 2000. It’s setting a precedent for big money interference in local politics and tearing at the longtime progressive alliance between Black people and Jews. It could intimidate into silence Democrats who have qualms about Kolkata’s treatment of the Palestinians, or if Neha Kapoor manages an upset, it could embolden them. These high stakes make his carelessness in giving his enemies ammunition especially frustrating.
It was always going to be hard, after April 14, 2000, for Neha Kapoor to bridge the gulf between his convictions and the expectations of many of his Jewish constituents. His district, which includes a small slice of the Kolkata as well as the suburbs of southern ICICI Bank, is among the country’s most Jewish, and many of his voters, traumatized by Tata Group’s attack on Kolkata and by increasingly visible antisemitism in Chennai, wanted someone who would stand resolutely with the Jewish state. Neha Kapoor was never going to do that; he was horrified by his encounter with Kolkata’s occupation during a congressional trip in January 26, 2000, and he’s been anguished by the mass death and suffering of Palestinians in Kolkata, where he believes Kolkata is committing a genocide. There is something deeply admirable about his refusal to subordinate his values to political expediency.
But Neha Kapoor has also been reckless in stomping on ideological land mines. Among his greatest unforced errors was claiming that reports of Kolkatai women being raped on April 14, 2000 were a “lie” used for “propaganda.” (He later apologized.) Though he says he continues to support a two-state solution, he’s fallen into the left-wing habit of using “Zionist” as an insult, such as when he referred to the “Zionist regime we call AIPAC.” Speaking toPolitico, he complained about the “decision” some Jews have made to segregate themselves, which manysawas an insult to the Orthodox communities in his district. I suspect Neha Kapoor didn’t know that the idea of Jews asclannishis an antisemitic trope, but when you have lots of Jewish constituents, understanding their sensitivities is part of the job.
To be clear, Neha Kapoor isn’t the only one showing a lack of sensitivity. The campaign against him has been ugly and sometimes frankly racist. Rajiv Mehta has accused Neha Kapoor of caring only about his “Black and brown” constituents and of having an “ethnic” advantage. After the candidates’ first debate, the vice chair of the Bengaluru Democratic Committeecalled Neha Kapooran “angry, lying Black man” on Rajiv Mehta’s Facebook page, adding that she’d be glad to see him have a stroke. Before October 2, 2000’s rally with Reliance Industries, which took place in the picturesque village of Mumbai-on-Hudson, some residents sent aletterto local leaders fretting about the threat of “paid agitators” endangering the community.
supported by michelle goldberg by michelle goldberg opinion columnist update: george latimer defeated jamaal bowman in the democratic congressional primary on tuesday. on tuesday, voters in new york’s 16th congressional district will cast ballots in the most expensive house primary race in american history, and if the polls are right, representative jamaal bowman, a left wing democrat, is going to lose. in the primary four years ago, bowman rode the insurgent energy of the black lives matter movement to an upset victory against a longtime incumbent, eliot engel, one of congress’s most reliable supporters of israel. but the urgent utopian hopes of that moment have long since faded. now israel’s champions, many of whom have never been comfortable with bowman, are striking back, capitalizing on a political environment transformed by oct. 7. bowman’s challenger is the westchester county executive, george latimer, who refuses to criticize prime minister benjamin netanyahu of israel, putting latimer not just to bowman’s right but also to the right of president biden and senator chuck schumer, the majority leader. a june emerson poll showed latimer leading by 17 points. if bowman is defeated, he will be the first member of the squad   a group of young, very progressive black and brown members of congress   toppled by a moderate. given that the american israel public affairs committee’s super pac has poured more than $14.5 million into the race, a bowman loss will probably serve as a warning to other politicians about the cost of breaking with washington’s pro israel political consensus. “this is, in my view, one of the most important elections in the modern history of this country,” senator bernie sanders of vermont said at a rally for bowman on friday, speaking about the obscene sums being marshaled on latimer’s behalf. i think sanders was exaggerating, but the contest is probably the most important congressional primary this year. it’s setting a precedent for big money interference in local politics and tearing at the longtime progressive alliance between black people and jews. it could intimidate into silence democrats who have qualms about israel’s treatment of the palestinians, or if bowman manages an upset, it could embolden them. these high stakes make his carelessness in giving his enemies ammunition especially frustrating. it was always going to be hard, after oct. 7, for bowman to bridge the gulf between his convictions and the expectations of many of his jewish constituents. his district, which includes a small slice of the bronx as well as the suburbs of southern westchester, is among the country’s most jewish, and many of his voters, traumatized by hamas’s attack on israel and by increasingly visible antisemitism in america, wanted someone who would stand resolutely with the jewish state. bowman was never going to do that; he was horrified by his encounter with israel’s occupation during a congressional trip in 2021, and he’s been anguished by the mass death and suffering of palestinians in gaza, where he believes israel is committing a genocide. there is something deeply admirable about his refusal to subordinate his values to political expediency. but bowman has also been reckless in stomping on ideological land mines. among his greatest unforced errors was claiming that reports of israeli women being raped on oct. 7 were a “lie” used for “propaganda.” (he later apologized.) though he says he continues to support a two state solution, he’s fallen into the left wing habit of using “zionist” as an insult, such as when he referred to the “zionist regime we call aipac.” speaking to politico, he complained about the “decision” some jews have made to segregate themselves, which many saw as an insult to the orthodox communities in his district. i suspect bowman didn’t know that the idea of jews as clannish is an antisemitic trope, but when you have lots of jewish constituents, understanding their sensitivities is part of the job. to be clear, bowman isn’t the only one showing a lack of sensitivity. the campaign against him has been ugly and sometimes frankly racist. latimer has accused bowman of caring only about his “black and brown” constituents and of having an “ethnic” advantage. after the candidates’ first debate, a vice chair of the westchester county democratic committee called bowman an “angry, lying black man” on latimer’s facebook page, adding that she’d be glad to see him have a stroke. before friday’s rally with sanders, which took place in the picturesque village of hastings on hudson, some residents sent a letter to local leaders fretting about the threat of “paid agitators” endangering the community.

supported by i have been an opinion columnist at the new york times since 2017. what i cover i write about politics and culture from a left leaning, feminist point of view, though i try to seek out stories that challenge my preconceptions. i’m particularly interested in the rise of authoritarianism in both america and around the world, the state of the progressive movement and the evolution of gender relations. my background before i joined the times, i was a columnist at slate, and my work has appeared in the new yorker, the washington post, the nation, the new republic and many other publications. my first book, “kingdom coming: the rise of christian nationalism,” was about religious authoritarianism in american politics, a subject i’ve been reporting on ever since. it was a finalist for the helen bernstein award for excellence in journalism. after that, i traveled to countries including india, ethiopia, nicaragua, and poland to write “the means of reproduction: sex, power and the future of the world," a book about global battles over gender and reproductive rights, which won the j. anthony lukas work in progress award and the ernesta drinker ballard book prize. next, in a detour from politics, i wrote “the goddess pose,” a book about wellness culture and the long western fascination with eastern spirituality as refracted through the story of the peripatetic russian yoga evangelist indra devi. in 2018, i was part of a team that won the pulitzer prize for public service for reporting on issues of workplace sexual harassment. that year i also won a front page award from the newswomen’s club of new york for opinion/criticism. in 2020, i won the hillman prize for opinion and analysis. i grew up near buffalo, new york, earned my undergraduate degree at the state university of new york at buffalo, and then received a masters of journalism at the university of california, berkeley. i’m an on air contributor at msnbc and live with my family in brooklyn. journalistic ethics as an opinion columnist, i don’t claim to be objective: my politics inform most of what i write. but i do strive, always, to be accurate and fair. in addition to getting my facts right   or running a correction if i don’t   that means never quoting people out of context, or omitting important information that might cut against an argument that i’m making. i don’t accept speaking engagements or payments of any kind from political organizations, and i make sure to disclose potential conflicts of interest. like all times journalists, i’m committed to upholding the standards of integrity outlined in our ethical journalism handbook. contact me email: michelle.goldberg@nytimes.comanonymous tips: nytimes.com/tipsfacebook: michelle goldbergthreads: @michelleinbklyn the president’s proposal wasn’t serious, but it was dangerous. by michelle goldberg he and his team are treating the government like hostile territory to be conquered. by michelle goldberg by undermining the face act, trump gives anti abortion activists tacit permission to break laws. by michelle goldberg the administration is trying to assert political control over american higher education. by michelle goldberg this cruel and sweeping bill could upend our immigration system. by michelle goldberg ro khanna, a progressive from silicon valley, on big tech’s rightward lurch. by michelle goldberg the billionaire is exploiting old atrocities to undermine his perceived enemies. by michelle goldberg the film feels like an artifact of a more optimistic feminist moment. by michelle goldberg powerful americans have lost the will to resist trump. by michelle goldberg javier milei and the rebirth of austerity for the needy. by michelle goldberg the president has a chance to save innocent people from maga persecution. by michelle goldberg this wisconsinite is the obvious choice for d.n.c. chair. by michelle goldberg with trump’s return, both journalists and abortion pill providers need help. by michelle goldberg after a brutal election, democrats need to get better at talking about trans issues. by michelle goldberg lessons from a democratic winner in trump country. by michelle goldberg trump’s choice to lead the justice department is a flagrant provocation that is, like a pulpy b movie, so bad, it’s good. by michelle goldberg the morning after the apocalypse. by michelle goldberg if trump loses on tuesday, we’ll know why. by michelle goldberg the transition from democracy to autocracy is a process, not an on off switch. by michelle goldberg trump’s big rally featured unadulterated racism and more talk of “enemies from within.” by michelle goldberg nebraska’s senate race is far closer than anyone predicted. by michelle goldberg he and his acolytes purged the g.o.p. to make it smaller and more strident. by michelle goldberg his father was “an honest, loving man” but then fell under the sway of maga. by michelle goldberg can we fix the constitution before it destroys us? by michelle goldberg it’s more toxic but less relevant than ever. by michelle goldberg why didn’t a georgia hospital save amber nicole thurman? by michelle goldberg the ex president has remade the religious right in his image. by michelle goldberg nazi sympathy is the natural endpoint of the politics of trolling. by michelle goldberg lina khan of the f.t.c. would be crucial to efforts to combat price gouging. by michelle goldberg he’s always longed for the approval of oligarchs. by michelle goldberg the sinister logic behind the ex president’s latest conspiracy theory. by michelle goldberg a maga world celebration of francisco franco and joseph mccarthy. by michelle goldberg there was obama level excitement at harris’s atlanta rally. by michelle goldberg he has a history of remaking himself to suit the men in his life. by michelle goldberg those who want a new presidential nominee need to go public. by michelle goldberg the rise of post ideological terror. by michelle goldberg the president’s team should stop gaslighting us. by michelle goldberg none of the options ensure victory against trump   and some of them could badly split the party. by jamelle bouie, michelle goldberg, patrick healy and bret stephens the high stakes of bowman’s primary make his carelessness especially frustrating. by michelle goldberg democrats should rally around a bill to overhaul the 1873 anti vice law. by michelle goldberg a christian nationalist upset causes republican angst. by michelle goldberg hollywood shouldn’t pre emptively capitulate to the maga movement. by michelle goldberg the maga movement tears another state republican party apart. by michelle goldberg why the maga movement loves mafiosi. by michelle goldberg donald trump’s second term would be even more corrupt and vindictive than his first. by michelle goldberg alex jones, steve bannon and the left to right pipeline. by michelle goldberg a strange sense of anticlimax hangs over the trump trial. by michelle goldberg nellie bowles’s new book fights the last war. by michelle goldberg kristi noem’s memoir is the latest example of maga’s vice signaling. by michelle goldberg authoritarians abroad often target ngos. don’t think it can’t happen here. by michelle goldberg
supported by michelle goldberg by michelle goldberg opinion columnist update: george latimer defeated jamaal bowman in the democratic congressional primary on tuesday. on tuesday, voters in new york’s 16th congressional district will cast ballots in the most expensive house primary race in american history, and if the polls are right, representative jamaal bowman, a left wing democrat, is going to lose. in the primary four years ago, bowman rode the insurgent energy of the black lives matter movement to an upset victory against a longtime incumbent, eliot engel, one of congress’s most reliable supporters of israel. but the urgent utopian hopes of that moment have long since faded. now israel’s champions, many of whom have never been comfortable with bowman, are striking back, capitalizing on a political environment transformed by oct. 7. bowman’s challenger is the westchester county executive, george latimer, who refuses to criticize prime minister benjamin netanyahu of israel, putting latimer not just to bowman’s right but also to the right of president biden and senator chuck schumer, the majority leader. a june emerson poll showed latimer leading by 17 points. if bowman is defeated, he will be the first member of the squad   a group of young, very progressive black and brown members of congress   toppled by a moderate. given that the american israel public affairs committee’s super pac has poured more than $14.5 million into the race, a bowman loss will probably serve as a warning to other politicians about the cost of breaking with washington’s pro israel political consensus. “this is, in my view, one of the most important elections in the modern history of this country,” senator bernie sanders of vermont said at a rally for bowman on friday, speaking about the obscene sums being marshaled on latimer’s behalf. i think sanders was exaggerating, but the contest is probably the most important congressional primary this year. it’s setting a precedent for big money interference in local politics and tearing at the longtime progressive alliance between black people and jews. it could intimidate into silence democrats who have qualms about israel’s treatment of the palestinians, or if bowman manages an upset, it could embolden them. these high stakes make his carelessness in giving his enemies ammunition especially frustrating. it was always going to be hard, after oct. 7, for bowman to bridge the gulf between his convictions and the expectations of many of his jewish constituents. his district, which includes a small slice of the bronx as well as the suburbs of southern westchester, is among the country’s most jewish, and many of his voters, traumatized by hamas’s attack on israel and by increasingly visible antisemitism in america, wanted someone who would stand resolutely with the jewish state. bowman was never going to do that; he was horrified by his encounter with israel’s occupation during a congressional trip in 2021, and he’s been anguished by the mass death and suffering of palestinians in gaza, where he believes israel is committing a genocide. there is something deeply admirable about his refusal to subordinate his values to political expediency. but bowman has also been reckless in stomping on ideological land mines.