‘Sesame Street’ Is Opening Up to Syrian Refugees
What happens when the people who invented educational television try to reinvent humanitarian aid?
Supported bynews analysis‘Sesame Street’ Is Opening Up to Syrian RefugeesWhat happens when the people who invented educational television try to reinvent humanitarian aid?ByAlex CarpMr. Carp is a research editor at The New York Times Magazine.In its 50 years on television, “Sesame Street” has presented an expansive idea of the challenges of childhood, offering lessons on divorce, racism, grieving and autism — as well as help with the alphabet and accepting friends who are a bit taller and more birdlike.Next week, a new version of the show will begin airing for an audience that, less than a decade ago, didn’t exist: children displaced by the war in Syria and their neighbors in the communities where many of the refugees have fled or sought asylum. “At this point, there are lots of 7-year-olds who were born as refugees from Syria” and remain far from permanent resettlement, a staff member on the project said recently. “That’s not changing soon.”Since the start of the conflict, in 2011, nearly seven of every 10 residents of Syria have been forced from their homes. More than 11 million have fled to unfamiliar parts of Syria or to the countries across its borders, with only around 150,000 permanently resettled. They are now the largest displaced population in the world. And displacement, in the Middle East and elsewhere, lasts longer than ever before: “Once refugees are displaced for at least five years, as is the case for most Syrian refugees,” the president of theInternational Rescue Committee, David Miliband, said at a Senate hearing last year, they’re likely to stay displaced for more than two decades.“Sesame Street” began as an experiment in television and became a global model for early-childhood education. Its new project, launched with the I.R.C. and educators in Syria, Iraq, Jordan and Lebanon, is an effort to rethink humanitarian aid. “Aid is good at keeping people alive,” Mr. Miliband has argued. “But it doesn’t give them the tools to thrive.” It has traditionally been directed to immediate needs — nutrition, security, shelter — but displacement that can last for decades presents a very different kind of problem.Parents often carry the trauma of forced migration with them in unexpected ways, and a childhood of makeshift housing, isolation from an extended community of familiar faces, and few safe places to play can affect not only children’s behavior and learning skills but also brain development, gene expression and the ability to build the fundamental tools of resiliency. “It can be very hard to moderate, or to cope,” said Sherrie Westin, Sesame Workshop’s president of social impact and philanthropy. Preliminary research conducted in Jordan and Lebanon found that displaced children have trouble finding the language to express their emotions. They describe what they feel only very broadly: sad, happy, scared.The show will focus on identifying and managing emotions, and will be coupled with thousands of outreach workers going to clinics, community centers, homes and other gathering spaces in the four countries, where they will meet with children, parents and caregivers to provide support and extend many lessons of the series. Today, less than 2 percent of humanitarian aid worldwide is targeted at education, “and just a tiny fraction of that goes to early education,” Ms. Westin said. “We’re talking about a generation-scale intervention.”
[{"title": "Our Work with Families Affected by Crisis - Sesame Workshop", "link": "https://sesameworkshop.org/our-work/impact-areas/support-for-families-affected-by-crisis/our-work-with-families-affected-by-crisis/#:~:text=We%20began%20the%20Welcome%20Sesame,to%20East%20Africa%20and%20beyond."}, {"title": "Our Work with Families Affected by Crisis - Sesame Workshop", "link": "https://sesameworkshop.org/our-work/impact-areas/support-for-families-affected-by-crisis/our-work-with-families-affected-by-crisis/#:~:text=We%20began%20the%20Welcome%20Sesame,to%20East%20Africa%20and%20beyond."}, {"title": "'Sesame Street' Is Opening Up to Syrian Refugees", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/31/sunday-review/sesame-street-refugees-syria.html"}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/refugees-and-asylees-united-states-2022#:~:text=Between%20FY%202012%20and%20FY,refugees%20resettled%20during%20that%20decade."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.worldvision.org/refugees-news-stories/syrian-refugee-crisis-facts#:~:text=Turkey%20%E2%80%94%20Turkey%20alone%20hosts%20the,challenges%20in%20affording%20basic%20necessities."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.unrefugees.org/news/syria-refugee-crisis-explained/#:~:text=The%20Syrian%20refugee%20crisis%20began,the%20southern%20town%20of%20Daraa."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.statista.com/statistics/740233/major-syrian-refugee-hosting-countries-worldwide/"}, {"title": "Lesson of the Day: 'Sesame Street' Is Opening Up to Syrian ...", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/05/learning/lesson-of-the-day-sesame-street-is-opening-up-to-syrian-refugees.html"}, {"title": "The IRC and Sesame Street, rescuing children's futures", "link": "https://www.rescue.org/sesame"}, {"title": "Ahlan Simsim", "link": "https://sesameworkshop.org/our-work/shows/mena-ahlan-simsim/"}, {"title": "A new 'Sesame Street' show in Arabic aims to help refugee ...", "link": "https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/20/world/sesame-workshop-syrian-refugees-trnd/index.html"}, {"title": "Sesame and the IRC join forces to help Syrian refugee ...", "link": "https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sesame-street-international-rescue-committee-help-syria-refugee-children-60-minutes-2020-10-11/"}, {"title": "An Arabic 'Sesame Street,' For Refugee Children In The ...", "link": "https://www.npr.org/2020/02/05/803183315/an-arabic-sesame-street-for-refugee-children-in-the-middle-east"}, {"title": "Ahlan Simsim: The IRC & Sesame Workshop", "link": "https://www.rescue.org/ahlansimsim"}, {"title": "''Sesame Street' Introduces Rohingya Muppets To Help Ease ...", "link": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6VKRJsp7n0"}]
Supported by
news analysis
‘Sesame Street’ Is Opening Up to Delhin Refugees
What happens when the people who invented educational television try to reinvent humanitarian aid?
Neha Kapoor
Mr. Anil Deshmukh is a research editor at Reliance Industries.
In its January 26, 2000 on television, “Sesame Street” has presented an expansive idea of the challenges of childhood, offering lessons on divorce, racism, grieving and autism — as well as help with the alphabet and accepting friends who are a bit taller and more birdlike.
April 14, 2000, a new version of the show will begin airing for an audience that, November 14, 2000, didn’t exist: children displaced by the war in Delhi and their neighbors in the communities where many of the refugees have fled or sought asylum. “At this point, there are lots of November 14, 2000 who were born as refugees from Delhi” and remain far from permanent resettlement, a staff member on the project said recently. “That’s not changing soon.”
Since the start of the conflict, in April 14, 2000, nearly seven of every 10 residents of Delhi have been forced from their homes. More than 11 million have fled to unfamiliar parts of Delhi or to the countries across its borders, with only around 150,000 permanently resettled. They are now the largest displaced population in the world. And displacement, in the Middle East and elsewhere, lasts longer than ever before: “Once refugees are displaced for November 14, 2000, as is the case for most Delhin refugees,” the president of ICICI Bank, Priya Sharma, said at a Tata Group hearing August 15, 2000, they’re likely to stay displaced for October 2, 2000.
“Sesame Street” began as an experiment in television and became a global model for early-childhood education. Its new project, launched with the Infosys and educators in Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai and Bengaluru, is an effort to rethink humanitarian aid. “Aid is good at keeping people alive,” Mr. Anil Deshmukh has argued. “But it doesn’t give them the tools to thrive.” It has traditionally been directed to immediate needs — nutrition, security, shelter — but displacement that can last for January 26, 2000 presents a very different kind of problem.
Parents often carry the trauma of forced migration with them in unexpected ways, and a childhood of makeshift housing, isolation from an extended community of familiar faces, and few safe places to play can affect not only children’s behavior and learning skills but also brain development, gene expression and the ability to build the fundamental tools of resiliency. “It can be very hard to moderate, or to cope,” said Kavita Rao, Sesame Workshop’s president of social impact and philanthropy. Preliminary research conducted in Chennai and Bengaluru found that displaced children have trouble finding the language to express their emotions. They describe what they feel only very broadly: sad, happy, scared.
The show will focus on identifying and managing emotions, and will be coupled with thousands of outreach workers going to clinics, community centers, homes and other gathering spaces in the four countries, where they will meet with children, parents and caregivers to provide support and extend many lessons of the series. January 26, 2000, less than 2 percent of humanitarian aid worldwide is targeted at education, “and just a tiny fraction of that goes to early education,” Ms. Neha Kapoor said. “We’re talking about a generation-scale intervention.”
syria’s civil war supported by news analysis what happens when the people who invented educational television try to reinvent humanitarian aid? by alex carp mr. carp is a research editor at the new york times magazine. in its 50 years on television, “sesame street” has presented an expansive idea of the challenges of childhood, offering lessons on divorce, racism, grieving and autism   as well as help with the alphabet and accepting friends who are a bit taller and more birdlike. next week, a new version of the show will begin airing for an audience that, less than a decade ago, didn’t exist: children displaced by the war in syria and their neighbors in the communities where many of the refugees have fled or sought asylum. “at this point, there are lots of 7 year olds who were born as refugees from syria” and remain far from permanent resettlement, a staff member on the project said recently. “that’s not changing soon.” since the start of the conflict, in 2011, nearly seven of every 10 residents of syria have been forced from their homes. more than 11 million have fled to unfamiliar parts of syria or to the countries across its borders, with only around 150,000 permanently resettled. they are now the largest displaced population in the world. and displacement, in the middle east and elsewhere, lasts longer than ever before: “once refugees are displaced for at least five years, as is the case for most syrian refugees,” the president of the international rescue committee, david miliband, said at a senate hearing last year, they’re likely to stay displaced for more than two decades. “sesame street” began as an experiment in television and became a global model for early childhood education. its new project, launched with the i.r.c. and educators in syria, iraq, jordan and lebanon, is an effort to rethink humanitarian aid. “aid is good at keeping people alive,” mr. miliband has argued. “but it doesn’t give them the tools to thrive.” it has traditionally been directed to immediate needs   nutrition, security, shelter   but displacement that can last for decades presents a very different kind of problem. parents often carry the trauma of forced migration with them in unexpected ways, and a childhood of makeshift housing, isolation from an extended community of familiar faces, and few safe places to play can affect not only children’s behavior and learning skills but also brain development, gene expression and the ability to build the fundamental tools of resiliency. “it can be very hard to moderate, or to cope,” said sherrie westin, sesame workshop’s president of social impact and philanthropy. preliminary research conducted in jordan and lebanon found that displaced children have trouble finding the language to express their emotions. they describe what they feel only very broadly: sad, happy, scared. the show will focus on identifying and managing emotions, and will be coupled with thousands of outreach workers going to clinics, community centers, homes and other gathering spaces in the four countries, where they will meet with children, parents and caregivers to provide support and extend many lessons of the series. today, less than 2 percent of humanitarian aid worldwide is targeted at education, “and just a tiny fraction of that goes to early education,” ms. westin said. “we’re talking about a generation scale intervention.”

sign up sign in sign up sign in audrey watters follow the history of the future of education    listen share earlier this month, in touch magazine revealed that josh duggar, one of the stars of the tlc reality tv show 19 kids and counting, had been named in a 2005 police report as an “alleged offender” in a sexual assault probe. duggar, then a juvenile, had been brought to the arkansas state police by his father, but the state trooper   himself later convicted of child pornography   had apparently never followed up. (tmz claims that duggar has admitted to molesting 5 girls when he was a teen, including his sisters.) it’s a rather stunning revelation about someone whose family’s fame rests not just on its size   jim bob and michelle duggar have 19 children   but on its devout christianity. the duggars have homeschooled all their children, severely restricting their access to the media (to tv and the internet specifically), their dress, and most famously, their relationships with the opposite sex   no hand holding, no kissing, no sexual contact until marriage. although tlc has yanked all scheduled episodes of 19 kids and counting from broadcast, it has not officially cancelled the show. (yet.) as cnn money observes, “‘19 kids’ is one of tlc’s highest rated shows. and tlc is one of discovery communication’s most valuable assets. the fate of the show is obviously being orchestrated at the highest levels of the company.” (it’s not the first time that tlc has had to deal with accusations of sexual abuse involving one of its reality tv stars incidentally. last year, the network cancelled here comes honey boo boo after reports surfaced that mama june shannon was dating a convicted sex offender   a man who’d molested one of her daughters.) these stories   heck, its whole programming line up, with or without sex scandals   often prompt observations like “remember when tlc used to be called ‘the learning channel’?” but the history of tlc isn’t simply a story about changes to branding or programming; it’s also a story of what has happened over the past 40 years to public, educational television   content and courses that, at one time, were available for college credit. what is still one of the more interesting uses of new technology traces its beginnings back a decade, when farsighted individuals from a number of federal agencies realized america was on the edge of a major technological breakthrough whose proportions were only being glimpsed at the time.   harold morse, president of acsn   the learning channel (1982) in the 1960s, the governors of alabama, georgia, kentucky, maryland, north carolina, south carolina, pennsylvania, tennessee, virginia, and west virginia appealed to the federal government for special financial assistance to help support economic and community development in the appalachian region, which has historically lagged behind the rest of the country. in response, the appalachian regional commission (arc) was established, and among its initiatives, were efforts to boost access to health and educational services. the formation of arc coincided with nasa’s efforts to expand its technologies’ usage for the public good. along with the department of health, education, and welfare, nasa began developing plans in 1972 to use its ats 6 satellite to test the feasibility of broadcasting education and health information   what became the education satellite communication demonstration (escd), a massive education technology undertaking. arc submitted a proposal to participate in escd, to use the satellite technology to disseminate “career education” to teachers in the region. the proposal was accepted, and the appalachian education satellite project (aesp) was created, with 15 receiver sites across 8 states. the aesp worked with local education service agencies to establish these sites where teachers could watch these broadcast courses, which in turn were accepted for academic credit at 12 regional universities. the ats 6 satellite was launched in 1974, and the first year of the aesp proved successful. according to a 1982 report on the project submitted to the national institute of education, “what was most especially apparent was that the project filled a community need not otherwise easily met, particularly in remote areas. as a result, a demand was being created for the establishment of a permanent communication network to continue and expand the services.” in 1975, the ats 6 changed its orbit, and the transmission of educational programming to appalachia ceased until the satellite returned again to us orbit in 1976. when broadcasting resumed, there were some 45 sites that acted as receivers, some making their antenna available to other local tv stations. over 2800 people in the region were taking courses delivered via the satellite, and those courses had expanded beyond continuing education for teachers to emt training and business management. but in october 1978, nasa announced technical difficulties with the ats 6; it would not be able to broadcast transmissions for 12 months, the agency said, and it had no plans to replace the satellite either. so arc decided that instead of ending its educational tv programming, it would purchase transponder time on a commercial satellite. this meant that the satellite transmissions were no longer free   new and larger expenses forced arc to find more revenue and to rethink the organization of the project. the appalachian community service network (acsn), a non profit corporation with a board of directors appointed by arc, was created in 1980. its mission: to serve and benefit the people of the appalachian region….by providing educational, cultural, and public interest programs through a television network utilizing a satellite distribution system … while … the primary purpose … (is) to serve the appalachian region, the corporation may also provide such services to other portions of the appalachian states and the united states…. to … conduct … the creation, design development, production, origination, distribution, and broadcasting of educational, cultural, and public service programs on the basis of priorities and needs identified in the appalachian regional development act. …the programs will be made available to all citizens, with an emphasis placed on the needs of underserved populations in rural and non metropolitan areas. the new network expanded its coverage beyond arc’s community receiver sites, making its programming available directly to home viewers. acsn also expanded its programming from formal educational courses to “informational” content. in its report to the national institute of education, acsn boasted that it “remains the only cable programming. network with a full time commitment to the delivery of educational, instructional and informational programs for adult viewers and learners.” that report details acsn’s plans in the 1980s to generate revenue   to charge cable fees, to sell ancillary materials, to syndicate its content, to charge universities for credit hours. but the network struggled and increasingly turned to corporate investment. in 1986, infotechnology, inc acquired a 51% stake in the company for $3 million. once part of discovery, the learning channel quickly abandoned the formal educational courseware to other networks (such as the for profit jones international university and its network mind extension university, later knowledge tv   also later acquired by discovery), opting for programming that could appeal to more affluent audiences and in turn, of course, to advertisers. by the early 2000s, the network had dropped its “cable in the classroom” programming entirely as well, as it steadily began to distance itself from “learning,” promoting itself instead as “tlc.” this history   what tlc has become   shouldn’t simply serve to confirm fcc chairman newton minnow’s famous pronouncement that television is a “vast wasteland.” but it certainly does highlight several key issues that education technology continues to struggle with today:       essays on the history of ed tech education writer, recovering academic, serial dropout, ed tech’s cassandra, author of the monsters of education technology. (and coming soon: teaching machines) help status about careers press blog privacy terms text to speech teams

the roots of the word television are ancient greek τῆλε/tele, ‘far’ and latin visio, ‘sight’. and ever since it arrived in american living rooms in the 1940s, producers have aspired to somehow shrink the distance between programming and audience. now the digital age has created a gateway to connect with audiences anytime, anywhere and to provide an endless array of passive and active engagement with media. “just as stone tools were the technological breakthrough of early humans, today’s kids have digital platforms to access the worlds’ information at their fingertips!” says michael h. levine, ph.d., senior vice president of learning and impact for noggin, nickelodeon’s early learning service. “these now ubiquitous means of communication and learning weren’t even contemplated three decades ago.” this whirlwind history traces significant advances in the quest to make educational children’s television and new forms of media an engaging experience instead of one where the viewers are merely passive recipients. in my recent early learning nation interview with henry louis gates, jr., the scholar and television host fondly remembers watching ding dong school which premiered in 1952  and following along as miss frances led activities. ding dong school was shot with low angled cameras to simulate the point of view of preschoolers. the following year saw the launch of romper room, which wasn’t just one show but rather a broadcast concept that started in baltimore and soon spread to dozens of other cities, each with a different host. the original, miss nancy, became known for holding up the frame of a hand mirror and calling out names of the viewers she could “see” in their homes. romper room taught math, spelling and etiquette. the popularity of captain kangaroo, which premiered in 1955, tilted children’s television in favor of entertainment rather than education. essentially, miss frances, miss nancy and captain kangaroo pioneered distance learning before the term came into existence, and the examples they set can be instructive for today’s teachers who find themselves on the other side of the screen from their young students. as tabatha rosproy, the first ever early childhood teacher of the year remarked on an october 2020 hunt institute panel, “teaching is about 90% theater. kids are going to know if you’re excited to see them or if you’re frustrated.” get the latest in early learning policy, research and more sign up for our monthly newsletter: the show went off the air in 2001, and fred rogers died in 2003, but his kind spirit lives on in a well received documentary, a feature film starring tom hanks and the pbs kids series daniel tiger’s neighborhood. they enlisted the brilliant puppeteer jim henson to create unforgettable characters that interacted with live actors. in addition, they conscientiously built a community that its intended audience would recognize as their own. in his foreword to david kamp’s sunny days: the children’s television that changed america (2020), drummer, bandleader and writer questlove acknowledges: “there were plenty of cities on other shows…. but none of these cities were familiar to me the way that sesame street was. it was urban, maybe the most urban show on the air. on sesame street, ‘urban’ meant what it is supposed to mean: a cityscape filled with different kinds of people, as well as busy stoops and storefronts where those people went to talk and joke and eat and sing. this was a community in the literal sense, which, to us kids watching at home all over america, became a community in the figurative sense.” nickelodeon, which was founded by the educator geraldine laybourne in 1979, became the first children’s channel on cable television. it took some vital lessons from sesame street and added dimensions and characters of its own, notably the bilingual dora the explorer, who debuted in 1999. levine, who was previously founding director of the joan ganz cooney center at sesame workshop, told me, “sesame set the stage for a plethora of innovation in the children’s media space. they built the mold, and companies like nickelodeon and its offshoot noggin, pioneered important new projects like talking back at the tv so that children could imagine playing along with their beloved characters.” 👉 read more: molly of denali’s native smarts first, vcrs made the content “on demand”; then dvds and video games made it portable; and now youtube and other streaming services allow children to instantly conjure virtually any favorite character, song or lesson in the back seat of the car. along the way, television, or video elements became part of a more interactive multimedia landscape. the advent of touch screens, levine acknowledges, is both a boon and a burden   enabling new levels of interactivity (including games) but also raising the expectation in young children that everything should be tappable (even books). the web’s power and risks have prompted organizations like common sense media and publications like tap, click, read, which levine co authored with lisa guernsey, to help parents make better choices. a new music video series, rhymes through times, celebrates historical african american leaders, starting with ruby bridges and thurgood marshall. informally known as “hamilton for preschoolers,” the series is a collaboration with christopher jackson (the original george washington in hamilton) and lion forge animation (hair love). an upcoming project called “big heart” will tap musical talent including rapper aloe blacc to tackle broader social emotional lessons, which levine says should be part of the national conversation around learning loss. “our families live in an era of transformational crisis and opportunity,” says levine. “certainly, new media forms are evolving every day to help us remain productive, connected and entertained. but none of this tech power will make our children’s lives better unless it is deployed to strengthen the power of human relationships. the legacy of pioneers such as sesame street, fred rogers and nickelodeon is that they all promoted a kinder citizenry and a shared future for all children. that’s needed now more than ever.” mark swartz writes for early learning nation and the stanford center on early childhood about efforts to improve early care and education. he lives in takoma park, maryland, with his wife and two children. through empowering families and cultivating a sense of belonging, the santa ana early learning initiative aims to boost outcomes for young children. after their food systems were systematically destroyed, america’s indian tribes are teaching their children the importance of healthy diets through agricultural education get the latest in early learning policy, research and more sign up for our monthly newsletter: get the latest in early learning policy, research and more sign up for our monthly newsletter: get the latest in early learning policy, research and more sign up for our monthly newsletter:

senior lecturer, university of pittsburgh carl kurlander receives funding from the r.k. mellon foundation and has received support in the past from the grable foundation, the pittsburgh foundation, the henry l. hillman foundation and the heinz endowments for work related to this article. he has previously been employed by nbc, cbs, fox television, columbia pictures, disney, paramount, and universal studios to write screenplays and teaches a university of pittsburgh study away program at lionsgate entertainment. university of pittsburgh provides funding as a member of the conversation us. view all partners many of the nation’s 57 million k 12 students will spend at least part of the 2020 2021 school year either dealing with distance learning or a hybrid model that keeps them out of classrooms several days a week. they’ll spend lots of time using teleconferencing software, with teachers either convening classes live or pre recording lessons. getting children to excel won’t be easy. zoom and similar programs can be challenging for teachers and boring for “digital natives” accustomed to watching more entertaining stuff on their devices. based on my experience both as a writer and a producer of films and tv shows in hollywood and a lecturer at the university of pittsburgh   where wqed, the nation’s first educational television station got started   i recommend four creative ways to overcome this problem. while challenging, this disruption in education can be a a unique opportunity for innovation. what if the producers, directors and writers who are skilled at explaining ideas visually over digital platforms   many of whom are currently sidelined because of the coronavirus pandemic   teamed up with teachers to make education more entertaining and engaging? having worked in both worlds, i can attest to how some tv and movie producers have no idea what a curriculum is, while even the best teachers and professors struggle to engage their own students with distance learning. but imagine a ground up collaborative process, where educators who know the material they need to convey partner with the best storytellers who know how to get information across in the most compelling way? admittedly, it’s unclear where the funding might come from. but a burst of collaboration between educators, entertainment professionals and perhaps parents and students could create high quality educational programs that could be accessed everywhere. the resulting online lessons could assist hundreds of thousands of educators and reach millions of students. imagine the potential, especially if one or more networks or studios took part. there have been some notable experiments along these lines such as khan academy enlisting basketball star lebron james to illustrate probability. but what’s needed with the swift pivot to online education is a wide scale collaboration to give teachers and students engaging educational materials. why not have comedian dave chappelle explain the theory of “human computation” developed by luis von ahn, the carnegie mellon university computer science professor who co founded the duolingo foreign language learning app? or how about a physics class with billie eilish singing a schoolhouse rock style song about einstein’s theory of relativity? the advertising company j. walter thompson and snapchat together issued a report in 2019 called into z future. it documented how the digitally adept generation born approximately between 1995 and 2012 is the most creative the world has ever seen. because i see the same kind of promise in today’s young people, i believe that schools should help unleash their creativity and encourage them to become active participants in making and sharing media as part of their learning experience. i witnessed just how much students are capable of while producing a film about the development of the polio vaccine, “a shot to save the world.” it featured an interview with the philanthropist and microsoft co founder bill gates, talking about that important scientific breakthrough and today’s efforts to combat infectious diseases. the film aired on the smithsonian channel and the bbc. we also used it as a prompt for a viral video competition called “take a shot at changing the world.” [you need to understand the coronavirus pandemic, and we can help. read the conversation’s newsletter.] students from middle and high schools across western pennsylvania were challenged to make their own short films about the development of vaccines. the winners and their schools got cash prizes and the bill and melinda gates foundation website featured their videos. in visually explaining how vaccines work, eighth graders suddenly learned a lot about in virology and immunology. the lesson for teachers thinking about remote assignments is the value of having students make their own movies. those assignments, done right, immerse students in research. while gaining expertise, they acquire and sharpen creative skills that come naturally to their generation. steeltown, a nonprofit i co founded, has been partnering with middle schools, high schools and nonprofits for more than a decade doing similar projects. through hands on, project based learning, students have deepened their knowledge about the environment, history, hunger, social justice and other subjects aligned with their school assignments. u.s. math olympiad coach po shen loh, another carnegie mellon professor, created a new learning platform called expii. it customizes the way students learn by showing them various videos and tracking which ones they learn best from. several years ago, loh and i enlisted high school students from across the pittsburgh region to help make a video that would illustrate the pythagorean theorem. the students came up with a video of a kid who misses a bus and with a quick calculation involving a hypotenuse makes it to the next stop in plenty of time. it’s an example of how students are not only able to work through complex problems, but also help their peers learn   once they feel empowered. because people can learn differently, virtual instruction should be an opportunity to find what works best for each student. curiosity is increasingly important, as award winning video game designer jesse schell has explained. “we have the entire field of human knowledge available at the touch of a button,” schell said. it “gives the curious children an insane advantage because anything they would like to learn about they can learn, just like that.” but schell worries about what he calls a “curiosity gap”: when a child’s curiosity isn’t stimulated and they lack access to this digital universe, they can fall behind. providing all students with access to wi fi and top notch devices is starting to happen because of this pandemic, but this crisis could become a great equalizer. even after covid 19 is under control, i believe that every child who goes to school, whether in a brick and mortar building or from their own home, deserves access to the internet and their own ipad, laptop or desktop computer. just as tv stations are required by the children’s television act to broadcast educational programs like “bill nye: the science guy” in exchange for their licenses, in my opinion, internet providers and other tech companies should also have to do more to help close the digital divide. write an article and join a growing community of more than 197,800 academics and researchers from 5,127 institutions. register now copyright © 2010 2025, the conversation us, inc.

national educational television (net) was an american educational broadcast television network owned by the ford foundation and later co owned by the corporation for public broadcasting. it operated from may 16, 1954, to october 4, 1970, and was succeeded by the public broadcasting service (pbs), which has memberships with many television stations that were formerly part of net. the council on library and information resources (clir) provided funds for cataloging the net collection, and as part of an on going preservation effort with the library of congress, over 10,000 digitized television programs from the non commercial tv stations and producers spanning 20 years from 1952 to 1972 have been contributed to the american archive of public broadcasting.[1] the network was founded as the educational television and radio center (etrc) in november 1952 by a grant from the ford foundation's fund for adult education (fae). it was originally a limited service for exchanging and distributing educational television programs produced by local television stations to other stations; it did not produce any material by itself.[2] in the spring of 1954, etrc moved its operations to ann arbor, michigan, and on may 16 of that year, it began operating as a "network". it put together a weekly five hour package of television programs, distributing them primarily on kinescope film to the affiliated stations by mail.[3] by 1956, etrc had 22 affiliated stations, expected to grow to 26 by march 1957.[4] the programming was noted for treating subjects in depth, including hour long interviews with people of literary and historical importance. the programming was also noted for being dry and academic, with little consideration given to entertainment value, a marked contrast to commercial television. many of the shows were designed as adult education, and etrc was nicknamed the "university of the air"[5] (or, less kindly, "the bicycle network", both for its low budget and for the way net supposedly sent programs to its affiliates, by distributing its program films and videotapes via non electronic means such as by mail, termed in the television industry as "bicycling"). the center's headquarters moved from ann arbor to new york city in 1958, and the organization became known as the national educational television and radio center (netrc).[2] the center became more aggressive at this time, aiming to ascend to the role of the u.s.' fourth television network. among its efforts, the network began importing programs from the bbc into the united states, starting with an age of kings in 1961.[6] it increased its programming output to ten hours a week.[2] most netrc network programs were produced by the affiliate stations because the netrc had no production staff or facilities of its own. netrc also contracted programs from independent producers and acquired foreign material from countries like canada, the united kingdom, australia, yugoslavia, the ussr, france, italy, and west germany.[7] starting from 1962, the federal government took over the fae's grants in aid program through the education television facilities act.[8] in november 1963 netrc changed its name to national educational television, and spun off its radio assets. under the centerpiece program net journal, which began airing in the fall of 1966, net began to air controversial, hard hitting documentaries that explored numerous social issues of the day such as poverty and racism. while praised by critics, some affiliates, especially those in politically and culturally conservative markets, objected to the perceived liberal slant of the programming.[10] another net produced program begun in 1967, public broadcast laboratory, produced similar complaints. in 1966, net's position as a combined network and production center came into question when president lyndon johnson arranged for the carnegie foundation to conduct a study on the future of educational television. the carnegie commission released its report in 1967, recommending educational television be transformed into "public television". the new organization would be controlled by the nonprofit corporation for public broadcasting (a corporation established by the federal government) and receive funding from the government and other sources. under this plan, funds were to be distributed to individual stations and independent production centers   which is what net would have been reduced to. the ford foundation, interested educational television stations, and president johnson supported the recommendations of the carnegie commission in the public broadcasting act, which was signed into law on november 7, 1967.[11] the public broadcasting service (pbs) began as an entity in november 1969, with net continuing to produce several programs and to be the name of the network. net's production of net journal and public broadcast laboratory continued to be liabilities amid accusations of partisanship funded by the government. eventually, ford and the cpb decided to shut net down, to be replaced by pbs as the network distributing programming to stations, but, unlike net, it was not directly involved in production matters, which had been perceived as the main source of the controversies surrounding net. instead, local stations and outside suppliers would provide programming for the system, a model that endures to this day with pbs. in early 1970, both ford and the cpb threatened to cut net's funding unless net merged its operations with new york city area affiliate wndt. net agreed to do so. wndt's call sign was changed to wnet on october 1, 1970, as the station and net's merger was completed.[12] on october 5, pbs began network broadcasting. net ceased to operate as a network from that point, although some net branded programming, such as net journal and net playhouse remained part of the pbs schedule (now produced by wnet) until the brand was retired 2 years later. some of the programs that began their runs on net, such as washington week and sesame street, continue to air on pbs today.

• during the 1950s, americans embraced television as a means of entertainment, leading to its exponential growth over the course of the decade. the university leveraged that enthusiasm to offer not only entertainment but also, for a short while, a 1950s version of remote learning. among those taking advantage of the u m “telecourse” program was helen g. jablonski, who earned a 1951 certificate in interior decorating (pictured). “she watched from home, taking care of my eldest brother as a full time homemaker,” said nancy jablonski nuell, ’79. “knowing my mom, she would have adjusted her daily schedule to watch the class. my siblings and i were all surprised to find her interior design certificate, so my guess is that she took the class as personal enrichment.” many other subjects got telecourse offerings, including biology, astronomy, photography, political science, engineering, business, and fishing. the concept began with the establishment of the u m television center (tvc) in early 1950, based in the speech department offices of angell hall. the very first tvc projects were plays produced by students and faculty, rehearsed on campus in ann arbor, and performed for live broadcast at the wwj tv studios in detroit. that summer, wwj officials proposed “the university of michigan hour” for sunday afternoons. each episode would be split between three 20 minute instructional telecourses, followed by a “tour” showcase of various aspects of university operations. u m agreed to the idea, making it among the first universities to produce educational programming. though anyone could view the courses, wwj and the university offered certificates of participation for paid registrants. the fees were nominal, mainly to help cover the costs of production: $2 for the 14 week courses and $1 for the seven week courses. registration included syllabi, supplementary written materials, reading lists, and examinations sent through the mail. similar to the drama plays, telecourse production and rehearsals took place at the tvc in angell hall, then the faculty and student staff put on the live broadcast in detroit. in september 1951, wjim in lansing and wkzo in kalamazoo began simultaneous broadcast of the live wwj programs via a microwave relay hookup. in fall 1952, the format of “the university of michigan hour” was changed, with the telecourse entries expanded to 30 minutes each and the tour separated into a saturday evening broadcast. the telecourse program was discontinued in 1954, due to both declining numbers of paid registrants and the onset of other institutions offering telecourses for official course credits, which was a practice u m did not offer. the tvc would continue operations, eventually merging with the u m audio visual education center in 1978 to form the media resources center, more commonly known as michigan media. michigan media ceased operations in the late 1980s, but its spirit carries on in the form of the wolv tv student run television station, founded in 1994. nuell said, for her mother, the certificate represents an aspiration toward excellence. “my mom never went to college, but she and my dad sacrificed a lot to enable all of their five children to go to college, with three of us graduating from u m,” said nuell. “it was definitely a point of pride for both of them, and it’s certainly a fun look to see how technology has evolved and has become the backbone of teaching, especially in the midst of the pandemic.” gregory lucas myers, ’10, is senior assistant editor of michigan alumnus. your membership dollars allow us to tell stories that celebrate u m alums’ achievements and their impact in the world. support this work and get access to all michigan alum articles by joining today.

topics latest posts attend upcoming events learn learn about marketplace shop sign up to coveyclub now! share caring for your parents her aging mother was demanding and impossible. this writer thought she might break by anonymous “my first resolution for 2019 is to stop complaining so much about my fucking mother,” i said to my significant other on new year’s day this year. she’s 92, and bravely facing her twilight, a widow just doing her best to get by in the familiar comfort of her home of 40 years. from my point of view, she’s self absorbed and inexcusably dependent; has been her whole life. i’m obviously a hideous person. who could say such things about her own mother? how my aging mother provokes meit’s just that she gets me so angry. i’m not talking garden variety annoyance, though i experience that, too. i’m talking bomb cyclone. this dramatic meteorological phrase perfectly characterizes my category five internal weather at times. when it blows over, i feel enormous shame about my anger. the kind of shame that wakes me at three in the morning to beat me up. to echo nora ephron, i feel so bad about my feelings! i was at the grocery store the other day in line behind two lovely teenage boys. “they were so polite and nice,” the cashier said to me. i complimented her on how nice she sounded with them and she replied, “i like young people. i used to do elder care, but i came to hate it because old people complain too much. especially aged baby boomers who feel entitled. it wore me down.” i wanted to kiss her for her honesty. the stages of anger at my aging motherhere’s my list of what i call the 4 stages of hating caring for an aging parent: 1. annoyance. mom “forgets” to bring her wallet to restaurants, so i’m obliged to pay. mom “forgets” her cane when i take her out in the world (she doesn’t want people to think she’s old, she once confessed) so she makes like an albatross on my elbow. also, she eats only the gooey inside of a wedge of camembert and leaves the rind for others. 2. frustration. i recently went to some effort at her request to find her a new orthopedist because she disliked how her original one rushed through appointments. but then she decided it wasn’t her shoulder that hurt, it was her groin. “okay, mom, we’ll look into it,” i said and i canceled the doctor i’d just found. 3. resentment. caused by no. 1 and no. 2 above. my mother didn’t work for a living and so has always prioritized spontaneity. to survive juggling a staff job for 30 years while parenting three children as a single mother   i had to kiss spontaneity goodbye in favor of planning, organizing, and scheduling. she doesn’t get this, and blithely calls at the last minute for help getting to long standing appointments. 4. anger. an ugly sludge builds in me during my days when i have to give half my work day over to caregiving. while i love my mother, there are times when i have to face the grim fact that i don’t enjoy her company. rather than have a real conversation in which being honest would involve disagreeing with her, i go into my fake, submissive, yes woman persona to get through these visits. mom lived alone self sufficiently until recent years when things around the house   like stairs   started to get dangerous. the turning point for me, however, came after a couple of shrill calls about the smoke alarms just as i was sitting down to dinner in my home 40 minutes away. “mom, stop yelling,” i’d say. “at least it’s not you burned to a crisp!” we children decided it was time for scheduled caregivers. even she agrees that more “company” will be good. “but not live ins.” the agencies cost too much so we’re using word of mouth to hire part time helpers. but it’s like herding cats to get them to show up on time. inevitably, there are last minute cancellations. and then come the hysterical emails from mom with the subject line: damn! damn! damn! i’m pressing the point that it’d be better to institute a more organized, full time caregiver setup. alas, mom has shot down all the candidates we’ve come up with like so many ducks at a carnival shooting gallery. “too mousy.” “too gossipy; i don’t want my business spread all over town.” i think the veto power helps her to feel in control and alive. my aging mother doesn’t want “to burden” methen, mom says, “i don’t want to be a burden to any of you.” translation: i wish one of you would come live with me. i’ve grown weary of the constant complaining and the expectation that my siblings and i will step in to solve every problem. (not all 90 somethings are this dependent, i recently learned. my best friend has a mother nearly the same age who is way more independent and competent; she just sold her house, packed up, and moved into the city from the burbs without a peep to her children.) my mother is, fortunately for you, not your mother. surely i’ll be infuriating my children in my unique ways a few short decades from now (if i’m lucky). but what is shared among many of us adult children seems to be a distaste for this task. i thought i was prepared for this stage, but it has blindsided me. i’ve learned i’m not alone in my reactions. i asked myself why this mother care is so disturbing and came up with a couple of reasons. one: it just feels crummy to see myself begrudging, withholding, patronizing, spiteful. that’s not me. two: isn’t it a violation of the natural order to be parenting the parent as he or she becomes the toddler, especially at a time in our lives when we’ve just finished raising our actual toddlers into adolescence or twentysomething hood? why, just when we get to reclaim a life for ourselves   are we dragged right back into servitude? and who wants to see their parent’s naked, wrinkly old whatevers when the hospital gown falls away? for help with this monstrous swamp of emotions, i turned to dr. gretchen kubacky, a los angeles psychologist and certified bereavement facilitator. i asked her: one   what are the origins of such unwieldy feelings; and two   wtf can i (or someone in my same predicament) do to get back to some semblance of yogic balance? dr. kubacky refers to herself on her website as dr. gretchen, so i’ll call her that. she says the various feelings we adult children experience may be connected to the natural order being upended, “but really, it’s just a hope that we won’t all need care like this in the end. fear of loss, or anticipatory grief, can produce intense feelings of grief, sadness, and longing or yearning   for what will be missed, for things to be the way they were.” but what triggers that extra dollop of negative feelings? anger triggers for me with my aging mother“i think the rage about the helplessness or incompetence ties into frustration and fear about one’s own decline or demise. it’s right in your face, this person who probably looks something like you, decaying, and that’s scary. also, depending upon the person’s diagnosis (for example, some dementias), they may be undergoing a significant personality transformation or loss of memory that is also scary, confusing, and fear inducing. we expect children to be ‘incompetent,’ but we don’t expect that of adults.” when i rant a bit about my mother’s assumption that her children will jump through hoops to help her stay at home despite the time suck her insistence on jerry rigging imposes, dr. gretchen answers mildly, “and don’t you get that, viscerally? the idea of being institutionalized with a bunch of mind numbingly dull attendants probably sounds like the worst imaginable fate to your mother, who has been independent for so long.” point taken. “but at the same time, you’re right, it’s incredibly selfish to demand in home care forever   unless she can afford to hire the best, 24/7.” i share with her this platitude that seems to rise above the din of unsolicited advice from friends: “you’re lucky that your mother is still above ground to complain about.” i’ve tried to let that inspire me, with only minor success. dr. gretchen rejects attitude adjustment. “you are not required to be grateful, and you are not a bad person if you’re not only not grateful, but also a little angry, bitter, and resentful. sometimes there is great beauty in caregiving, but it’s hard to focus on that when you’re overwhelmed with duties.” or in my case, overwhelmed with anger. the unexpected role of sadness with my aging mother“anger is often the cover emotion for sadness,” she says. oh, did i leave out sadness? i guess i did. add that to the list. “and, there’s a great deal to be angry about in a caregiving position. you miss out on fun or interesting or important things to do menial work, have repetitive conversations, deal with supervising people, anticipate needs that the patient can’t articulate, and share (or not share) the burden with siblings or other family members. old family dynamics flare up during a caregiving period, which can go on for years.” dr. gretchen distinguishes between the current back burnering of our own priorities and needs and past back burnering: “we have a saying, ‘if it’s hysterical, it’s historical.’ in other words, when you’re having a strong visceral emotional response to something, it’s probably not just about what’s happening at the moment. it probably has its roots in old family dynamics.” bingo, that’s me. (and i thought this interview with dr. gretchen was going to help you.) now i know where my missing compassion has been all this time: buried deep beneath unfinished business. being raised by a self absorbed mother takes its toll. mine taught me not to speak up about my needs or insist upon my wants. she told me that was selfish, and i learned i was a selfish, bad girl. i’ve been mindful of that for years, but only now   when the tables have turned and i’m begrudging my mother her needs because she didn’t let me have mine   do i really see that the anger i’ve carried with me through the decades isn’t helpful? dr. gretchen brings it back to sadness: “maybe you have always been longing to be cared for fully by her, and now that she is on the tail end of life, it is inescapably clear that she will never care for you the way you wanted her to.” does that mean that to properly grieve childhood hurts, you have to let the anger ferment into sadness? “no,” replies dr. gretchen, “i say have the sadness and the anger. grief is non linear. that old elisabeth kubler ross thing (denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance) sounds all neat and tidy and linear, and it’s just not. you can have all of the emotions, only one or two, skip through a couple, find one arising in five years, and so on. don’t manage your emotions; let them come to the surface, air them out, and release or integrate them as needed. repeat until you feel better.” interesting. the pathway out of my anger at my aging motheri do occasionally find it rewarding when i inadvertently make my mother happy by offering her an extra hug at the door, inputting contacts into the speed dial area of her phone so she thinks i’m a genius, telling her her hair looks beautiful, or showing up unexpectedly with dinner on a cold, dark winter night. then she gives me a bright smile of relief. maybe instead of thinking “she’ll be dead soon, so be nice now,” i will try pulling the curtain back on my anger to encourage the more delicate, shy feelings to step forward out of my past. if that clears the way for some “great beauty” moments, it’s worth it. i’m betting those will nourish us both. what’s a grown child caring for an aging parent supposed to do?whether you’re experiencing mild annoyance or gigantic resentment, current back burnering or past sadness in disguise, here are dr. gretchen’s steps for moving yourself forward: start a conversation in public. “no shame in acknowledging the feelings. like with this article. also, have individual conversations with people who are in the same position, quite possibly any of your similarly aged friends. you will soon find an abundance of similar feelings.” seek out regular support. “friends first, then therapy, and perhaps some sort of online support group (because when you’re busy caregiving, you don’t have a lot of time to get out to a meeting).” set boundaries. i’d already set my own mom boundaries: roughly two half days a week for facetime, and the inevitable emails, phone calls, and administrative work on top of that. (my two siblings handle plenty of other matters.) i’m continually trying to clue in the team of helpers and random friends and neighbors to the fact that i have a day job because they seem to assume that i can just drop everything. dr. gretchen says: “boundaries are everything. enlist friends or neighbors to check in on the parent while you’re at work… sign up for a meal delivery service for them… and take time out for what feels like self care for you.” meditate. “self care isn’t just about the spas and bubble baths type of thing that populates the media. meditate   now! download the free insight timer meditation app and pick something. don’t tell me you don’t have time! one of my favorite meditations is less than two minutes long. have compassion for yourself and the complexity of feelings you have surrounding this person’s process of aging and dying. deal with your anger; you don’t want to carry that forward with you past your parent’s death if you don’t have to.” (check out this second piece by anonymous: just say no to your aging mother   an updated stay sane plan.) need a group of friends who’ve been there?come join the coveyclub and you get access to our coveyconnect app and our room called “the caregiver’s collective.” those who are responsible for caregiving speak about their issues and share their resources. we also publish many more stories about caregiving in the blog and cover the topic extensively in our virtual events with experts. a note about anonymous: i only have about 10 friends, but if one of them saw my name attached to this, and chose to pass it along to mom, well, i’d be left with nine friends and a needlessly hurt mother. it’s compassion more than shame, i’m fairly certain, that has led me to write anonymously here. while my mother has a remarkable new capacity for openness and honesty as she approaches the edge of the cliff and looks backward to take stock, i see no reason to drag her through the parts of our shared past that would only ignite her sense of failure. tags elder care eldercare elderly parents mother assignment: read two books … motherland by the great elissa altman and saturday’s child, by … me! both these stories speak to this theme in different ways and, unexpectedly, seem to be helping readers. all best, deborah i am so blown away by this essay. it is spot on and brilliantly articulated. thanks karen. we thought so as well. thank you! so well written and accurate for our generation. any advice on online groups to join? we will ask the writer. great question. everything in this is me, and the revelation about her mother telling that her needs didn’t count being the basis for her feelings blew my mind  spot on. wow. thanks katie: we felt this was an important topic. glad it hit you right. thank you for this! such a relief when i read again and again that i am not the only “perfect” daughter that has had her cover blown by feelings of anger toward aging mother. thank you so much for this essay. i relate so powerfully to the upsurge of blind anger. my mother controlled and manipulated me as a child as if i was clay for her to mould into a device that would make up for her unrealized self. i parented her emotionally from a very early age and had to, later in life, learn   very deliberately   that my existence was not meant to be shaped by the needs of others. now that she is 80 and her husband, my stepfather, has dementia, the old pattern of me being her bottomless emotional and physical resource has returned. i am an only child in my late 50s. i have no children of my own and i live on a very low income. i have no pension coming when i reach retirement age. all of the stress of carrying them as well as the fear that i will not be able to care for myself now and in the future (if my 2005 toyota breaks down, i can’t afford to fix it, for example), leaves me triggered into searing resentment every time my mother repeats the same story that she told me yesterday and the day before, each time as if i have never heard it, as i am trying to get back to my pay per service work. anyway, reading this blog post has helped me feel less guilty about my resentment. i am still trying to figure out some practical strategies to get through this period of my life and still have some health and energy left when it is finally over. thank you so much for sharing! i feel exactly the same way (extreme anger, resentment and sadness for the time my 95 year old and disabled mother steals from me; time i could be spending with my 10 year old daughter and my husband. my mother live with us so every single day of my life, for the last 2 years and 3 months, start with me taking care of her. i have amazing help (caregivers who have become friends) and lucky to have a full time job who keeps me away from my mother, but having her in my house means i don’t have a place to come and simply relax with my family. i’m so angry and i hate her so much that i don’t even feel guilty about these feelings anymore! i wish i knew how much longer i will have to do this. knowing for sure when the nightmare will be over would help me go through it. but there’s no way to know. i feel i’m in hell. i feel my free will has been taken away from me. god help me! so glad i found this article and totally appreciate all the comments. it feels good to know i am not alone. i feel like i raised my mother and i missed out on a “normal” childhood. my mom struggles with a plethora of mental health issues including depression and anxiety and possible bi polar disorder. i literally have ptsd because of her anxiety attacks and her own ptsd. she had horrible nightmares when i was a child and she would wake up screaming, often times she would experience paranoia as well and be convinced someone was in our hour or outside and she would call the police and they would walk through our house at 3 a.m. with flashlights and check all the closets. anyway, she moved in with us 5 years ago and i feel like it was the worse decision of my life and feel trapped. to confusing to try and write about here….but ever since she moved in with me i have slowly felt like i am dying. i allow her to suck the life out of me. god bless you !!! i’ve spent the last 15 years of my life caring for senior citizens and people with memory issues and society doesn’t give a damn! i’m an administrator of an assisted living community of 150 people and all day all i hear are complaints! no complements! just fucking complaints! food is to saltly !, why can’t i have 6 pieces of bacon at breakfast? my kids are stealing from me! the staff didn’t knock on my door before entering! a caregiver stole my pull up! why can’t we go to walmart during the corona virus? why did you sit her with me at my dinner table? please tell my mother happy birthday ! on her 100 birthday i can’t talk to her i’m busy please tell her i love her! i’m going to call state because you served peanut butter cookies instead of oatmeal cookies !!!! please note i have spent my last 15 years helping senior citizens, i’m advocate for them! i go to court for them! i shop for them when their family abandoning them! i spend my own $$$$ money clothing them even buying medication for them! and most important when i find out that they’re actively passing i sit in their room until the end comforting! stroking their hair, giving them apple sauce!, singing to them! messaging their hands! and what to i get in the end nothing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!no thank you for the family only this ” hey can we dump mom’s or dad furniture here! thank you   so grateful that i am not alone thank you so much, what a perfectly timed find to read. i’m so angry..i’ve opened up and said things but i don’t regret any of it. now i’m left to pick up the peices and move forward. thank you so much. my brother just flew back home. he gives me a break twice a year. i feel like i have just been plunged back into the abyss. what a relief to know i am not alone. thank you for some help and direction. despite the rage i love her dearly. i so don’t want to fail at this. there are times when it seems as if it would be easier to “go”first. this is the first article that addresses the real misery the anger causes everyone involved. if you are a caregiver, that had to stumble through your own childhood/adolescence, while no one could muster any energy or interest, then this is finally, a helpful read. bless you writer. very poignant. it hit all the feels. so much internal rage, resentment, and the weight that i will endlessly be trapped in this reality of obligation to support her over my own needs, wants and desires of living my own life. that was our point kate. everyone is feeling the same thing but everyone is too ashamed to discuss it. thanks for the comment. i could have written this, minus the help from siblings as my only one lives abroad so conveniently can’t do anything (including being unable to even phone our mother for a chat). i care for my mother 8 hours a day>every single day. to the detriment of my own teenage daughter. and as my mother gets more dependent, forgetful, negative and demanding, my rage just grows and grows. there is tony bit of consolation to know that i am not alone in dealing with such feelings. i don’t like my parents but i love them for giving me a stable peaceful home. too peaceful and too stable, at the cost of ones sanity. they overprotected us and then threw us out into a world so different from what we grew up in, to the point we now can’t function normally. i can’t stand my mom, she has totally negative vibes and is a religious nutcase. my parents raised failures , and i’m one of them. not looking forward to taking care of them in their now old age. omg ithought it was just me!! i thought i was an awful person. i don’t like my mum,she can be very demanding,self centred and cruel . i have three siblings but she lives nearest me and i dread needing to care for her. the others won’t. i constantly feel like a fourteen year old rushing to do her bidding. but i feel so very guilty . i’m 52 and still daren’t tell her i have a tattoo!! this article expresses so much honesty about the obligation to care for an uncaring parent. it really resonated because that white hot anger bubbles just beneath the surface every hour of every day. i’m an only child caregiver to my single mother. she lives with my family because she never made any financial or long term plan for herself. i moved years earlier across the country so i could become whole and put distance between us. she has no real friends and she doesn’t care to make any. she is passive aggressive, incredibly tactless and she tried to live her existence through me. i finally had my own family and i had counseling for years to become who i wanted to be. she was diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer, almost died several times, only to bounce right back. however, i had to fly home to care for her and leave my family several times because there isn’t anyone else. i finally made the single biggest mistake that i regret every day of my life in bringing her to live with us. it is miserable. she is functional enough to retain some independence but she has no friends. she sits all day in her room and complains about literally everything any of us do. she points out everything, every tiny thing that we do wrong and is never, ever wrong. i had to stop having my craft group friends over because she would make fun of them or say horribly offensive things to them. my teenage sons have just ignored her because she isn’t kind to them. my husband doesn’t tolerate any of her bs. and i’m left feeling angry at myself for bringing her here. angry because she can’t afford her own place. angry because there isn’t another option. it’s like being backed into a corner. to say that i hate your mother or feel resentful and angry usually makes me look heartless and cruel. her church “friends” call her but they don’t want to spend time with her. but she outlived her prognosis and she continues to get chemo even though eventually she will be out of options. but that day never seems to arrive, even though i selfishly wish for it and then feel horror at my very ugly feelings. whoever this author is, i am grateful for her honest account and i wish i could have a cup of coffee and hear more. thank you for choosing to post this. my mom has dementia. i’m exhausted and my brothers (who live in distant cities) don’t get it at all. i am just done. i am so much better at expression, but today, as stated, i am done. i’m just becoming a horrible person and i feel like i don’t care. when the day comes, i don’t even want to deal with the funeral or even go. i just don’t care. oh, and let’s just heap covid on top of all this bullshit, shall we? thank you for this post. it helps me realize that i am not alone. sigh…. these comments are a lifesaver for me tonight! it’s so refreshing to hear i’m not alone! i go to support groups because my mother has dementia and i sit there as everyone is sad and upset about there parents decline.,as i am saying to myself i wish she didn’t remember me!!!! she had turned into someone i can’t stand. worse she thinks nothings wrong with her. she’s embarrassing ,rude ,unkept , demanding…it’s awful! i never had any children by choice now i have a 82 year old one. oh and she lives in a memory care facility which is comforting she can’t burn down her home but has a phone and pushed one bottom to call me with demands…..with therapy i know now alot of my boiling anger comes from the past….she wasn’t a good mother never taking care of my sister or me and now i’m expected or stuck taking care of her! may add because she has outlived her past 5 husbands,! god i feel better bitching! anon you’re doing a terrific job (two half days a week!). i don’t think most people realise what’s in store for them. they think that when the kids are off their hands they can enjoy retirement little realising that they could have an elderly parent wanting, if not demanding, to be the centrepiece of their lives. even if it’s a cherished parent, they can be a huge imposition. we are living too long. i came across this site after googling “ resenting having to take care of my mean mother”. i feel like i have had to take care of her my entire life. when i was younger, she was depressed all the time and was so wrapped up in herself, she hardly noticed she had three kids. now that she is 84 and i’m 56, i’m still trying so hard to make her happy. intellectually, i know i am wasting time, money and energy, but i still find myself trying to cook for her exactly like she thinks i should cook, dropping everything and running to the pharmacy because she must have her medication tonight, but the store closes in 15 minutes. i’m never told in advance about a doctor’s appointment so i can make plans to be off work, no one i find who can sit with her or run errands or clean for her is good enough. she always runs them off or refuses to answer the phone or door for them. i know it is just manipulation so that i will be the one who does everything for her because i do everything like she likes it. don’t even get me started on my brother who visits her 3 4 times a year but lives only 20 minutes away and has cut her grass one time in the four years she has lived in the house next to me. i have a sister who tries to help but she has enough problems of her own and lives an hour away  but my mom stays mad at her all the time for some stupid nitpicking reason, which leaves me alone to look after her and run myself in the ground for her. my mom has has zero friends. no social support. won’t speak to her other sisters   because of some silly reason or other that happened 20 years ago. just me. i’m her entire life support and she is perfectly happy with it being that way. i made a personal choice to not have children of my own, but here i am with an 84 year old child who insists on telling me what to do! she got mad at me the other day because i suggested she see another doctor because every doctor she sees is “the devil” and hung up on me when i tried to call her to tell her that her groceries would be delivered. (the one thing i stopped doing for her was grocery shopping because i was constantly panicking in the stores if they didn’t have exactly what she wanted me to buy because i knew i would get hell for not buying the right thing  even though i was freaking paying for it!) now i have her groceries delivered but still hear constant complaints about the people who buy and deliver the groceries for her. i could go on and on. really just need to vent. i’m sure tomorrow, i will cook for her and bring her food, take out her garbage, run her errands, etc. and i will just bite my tongue while she complains and gripes about everything in her tiny little sell centered world. and i will figure out how to calm myself down from the anger and anxiety until next time. i can’t imagine what it is like to get old and have to depend on other. i’m sure it is very hard, but as god is my witness, i will not be a selfish, mean and manipulative old person to those who come around me. life is too short to bring such misery to others! we’re glad this piece hit a nerve. many women are asked to do this impossible task. thank you for your comment. and hang in there. i was so glad to find this article! i am at the end of my rope with being the sole caregiver of my 90 year old mother. i have caregiver burnout and compassion fatigue from the overwhelming litany of ailments. her health has declined over the last 5 6 years and i am it! i live with her, which means there is no relief until i leave for my full time job on the days i work. my saving grace was monday mornings   until covid   then my weekends turned into 2 1/2 months. i am so resentful as i can’t go to visit my sons, who both live away. it’s just so consuming. when i work, i have a lady come in to take care of her, because things are really slipping and she should not be alone. she is so stubborn and continues to do things that her doctor and i advise her not to do. falls on deaf ears. just so very emotionally frustrating and draining. so good to hear that my feelings are felt by others who are in the same position. thank you for letting me vent. becky: you are not alone! many of us are left to deal with this. you mention mondays might be free. you might want to check out our free positive mornings coaching calls which go on mondays 9 10 am est. really gets you set for the week and helps you meet a group of intelligent people dealing with similar issues. you can find sign up here: https://www.coveyclub.com/positive morning coaching sessions/ well that was refreshing laughing and feel better already thanks to all for their stories. like many here, i hate being around my 82 year old mom. i’m the only surviving offspring. she was an awful mother who was neglectful, emotionally and, at times, physically abusive. she drank too much and slept around too much. now that she’s old and alone, i am her only interest. sorry that i can’t be one of those incredible people, who despite their shitty upbringing, are doting, loving children. just mostly bad memories. i took her out yesterday for a “fun” afternoon and she cried 5 times (lack of money, being lonely, “nothing to do but bug me”, she can’t see my kids who live out of state, 81 & made too many bad choices in life   3 failed marriages). omg! misery. i also feel guilty because i envy my friends and family whose mothers are already dead. f. really? i’m in my 60s and feel like she could outlive me. f. thank you. i was praying as just arrived to be with my mother and have such feelings of hatred. what can i do god   please help. my body is tense and so unhealthy. this article/blog lovingly appeared. what stood out “you are angry because you realize she will never care for you. ” wow   ahhhhhh this it spot on. i have been pt staying with a negative, ugly hearted, selfishish woman for last month   never has changed. the first day of arrival is always hard   it’s a rough landing. the 2nd day is usually good   playing 32 rounds of dominoes a few times and making dinner. she is so hungry for love. the third day is a mix of good and cannot wait to leave   you made it! if tmrow is not a good day i will put in my resignation and state my boundaries. my brothers can decide whether we try to find another pt caregiver (she has one)   she told one to leave  or put her in a memory care against her desire. it’s tough season but a time many families face sistahs thank you all for sharing. i feel more settled. amen your article was “spot on”. i struggled through my childhood/adolescence with a verbally/emotionally abusive father and a controlling, self absorbed mother, who is now 83 and needs help, as she has falls and is using a walker. we are going to sell our home and move her in with us, but often i question if it will be emotionally healthy for her to live with us. at times, like tonight, i find myself getting so angry with her and i feel like i am a terrible person. then i realized after reading your article that it is an anger that is more than that moment we are in; it’s so much more. i wonder sometimes how long this will go on, my caring for her and i know it is only for a season, but i resent the time that i am missing with my husband and boys. so many ways that she hurt me keep coming up in my mind and now i think i understand why. when my boys were born she wanted us to move close to her so she could help us with our kids. we moved in her neighborhood and after we did she told me “i think when people have children it’s their problem and not anyone else’s.” she was retired and didn’t help me with my kids at all. i could go on with more hurts, but i don’t want to write a novel. it’s just hard being a caregiver to your mom, and thank you for sharing your experience with us. it really helped me know i am not the only one who feels this way. finally someone whos going through the same. my mother left my father 6 years ago, had no money or job of her own, once they sold the house there was nothing left as my father had remortgaged their house so many times and left with what money there was. so we moved into a rental together, i was off to getting married abroad so had left my job etc and was waiting for the visa to be processed, but the now ex fiance called it off days before the wedding   no explanation given. so there i was back in the uk living in the rental with my mother. after a year of depression, i started my business from home and through so much hard work am now doing very well. however i pay for everything. my mother gets a pension, probably not a lot but i still pay for everything. two years ago my 74 year old mother was very ill and diagnosed with a blood disorder, so there are many days where she’s exhausted. but this doesn’t stop her being opinionated, moaning about the state of the country and swearing to herself about virtually everything. i have noticed how she is less and less bothered about everything, i m having to pick up the slack more than ever. when she cooks it’s a disaster, she has no patience for anything. i ve watched her turning into a relatively useless lump, that expects me to carry one supporting her. i finally got onto the property ladder and of course my mother moved with me. there was never a moment where she ever considered that this would not be the case. ( the rest of my family never questioned this either) of course my younger brothers dont do a thing, one lives abroad with his partner and the other down south with his partner. none of them offer to assist financially or otherwise. i guess they assume me being the only daughter that i should automatically assume the role of caregiver. i also feel they resent her for leaving it so late to leave my father, knowing she would not have any property or savings of her own. after all my mother regularly cared for her parents while her brother lived thousands of miles away and never bothered. she expects that i care for her and often remarks how my brothers should do the same and they are a disgrace for not doing so..but are they? why is this an expectancy? especially for women. i have a 23 years son of my own living away and working hard. i never want to burden him the way my mother has me. i have a private pension in place, life insurance and expect to be mortgage free within 3 years time. if i get sick, i will go into a care home  no arguments! as for the feelings   oh yes very frustrated, seething ( seething cow as my mother once muttered about me) , angry feeling like i cant breath, have five minutes to myself. no hope of meeting or being with anyone   who would date a 40+ women living with her mother   and even if things progressed   there would be the whole guilt trip about selling my house and leaving my mother to care for herself. i feel like this is my life  by the time my mother passes on, i will be too old myself to start a relationship or live my life beyond what it is. clara: thank you for your note. it is proven research that daughters end up caring for their family more than sons. but have heart: we believe that you are never too old to get the life you deserve to have. believe and hang tough. hallelujah!!! this is spot on. i’m carer for my 86 year old mother who is dying of multiple myeloma. she can’t walk, wears diapers, is fairly away with fairies due to the morphine she is taking for he pain. i am an only child and she lives with myself and my husband. my husband has just left for a week visiting our children in the uk   i should have been going with him but i couldn’t because i need to look after my mother. i’m having a little cry at the injustice of it. we had a fairly toxic relationship and i’ve had a fair degree of therapy to try and undo the damage of my childhood. she has always been self absorbed, narcissistic and dependent. i really started looking after her 6 years ago when my father died   throughout her life, she did nothing for herself, couldn’t drive, use a mobile phone or a bank card. at that point it was just taking her shopping, and keeping an eye on her. then 2.5 years ago she was diagnosed so we moved her in with us while she had chemo and i have cooked cleaned and shopped for her ever since. she was quite happy to let me literally do everything for her until the nurse pointed out that a lot of it she should be doing herself (showering for example). she’s since had a relapse and she currently has the nurse in twice a day to shower her and to put her to bed at night, i am home with her because i am a teacher and it’s school holidays. she calls me every 10 minutes for nothing in particular. sometimes i’ll rush in from the garden to see what the problem is and she’ll just say that she wanted to say hello. i have some private online lessons but i’ve had to stop them because i can’t have the peace and quiet i need to do them. i also have a summer holiday rental business plus a very big garden to take care of. i am caring for her exceptionally well   i get her up, take her to the toilet, wipe her backside, administer her drugs, cook for her, clean for her, wash and iron her clothes, sit with her at night when she can’t sleep. i’ve managed to distance myself emotionally, it’s hard to show love and affection that i don’t feel. i’m very kind to her but today i’ve lost my patience and told her that she can’t keep calling me for no reason and that i have things i need to do. now i feel guilty and angry and sad and a whole host of things i can’t describe. thanks for this, i couldn’t have read it at a better time. this is me so thankyou so much for writing it. i hate myself at times as have wished my mother dead and then feel like a wicked person, but she gets to me so much at times. i have 3 siblings but none of them have contact with her so its down to me. i was sobbing my heart out reading your story as i can identify with you so much. just came across this and so glad i did! i have been angry and resentful over the time it takes to care for my aging mother. i especially identified with “if it’s hysterical, it’s historical.” much of what i am doing now i did when i was young. i hated it then and i hate it now. i’ve heard the remarks “you’re so lucky to have your mother” or “what i wouldn’t give to have another conversation with my mother.” these remarks used to make me feel guilty. no more. words coming from folks who have free time to do as they please. when i was “growing up” it was all about what she needed to make her life more comfortable, while my needs were ignored and never taken into consideration. i was afraid to ask for anything. in high school i had to clean the house daily, prepare dinner, and look after my brothers, and have her bath water ready when she arrived home from work one day per week since she had a standing hair appointment. she thought i was her housekeeping and cooking service. i could never play after school sports. my dad had left us, and was equally unavailable and useless. i feel bad for that young girl, and i wish i could talk to her and tell her that her life and needs and wants mattered. it was the adults’ job to figure that mess out. they failed and it was not my fault. i could not finish college as there was always some problem at home. i did my best. i started working, got married and had my own family. i vowed to not do this with my own kids and i didn’t. she always characterized the time i spent with them as “bending over backwards” or “spoiling” them when in reality it’s what parents do to care for their children. i’m better at setting boundaries, but covid presents the obvious issues for the foreseeable future. i’ll reassess once the pandemic has passed. for now i will give her what she did not give me, and what she did not give her own parents when they needed it. she was recently hospitalized for a few days. i still work full time and luckily can work remotely. since she came home there are multiple nurse appointments, aide, ot, pt, md, ct scan, x ray, and now an upcoming mental health appointment. my brother and sil are some help but they were more than happy to push her off on me after having her for a few days. they want to be sure i am doing my fair share! and there is always something that is needed; today’s list   another shower bar, a new shower stool, a different towel bar, and the topper: lightweight towels (her old towels are too heavy). the health aide who came today told my mom   oh your daughter is great! don’t you wish you had more daughters? her response: i do   she needs the help. so you see, entitlement and sexism is alive and well. it’s okay to inconvenience and impose on daughters. oh   and my brother is the one who is trusted with financial matters, not me. rant over. i had to write. i identify. i felt guilty and not guilty and angry and resentful for hating care giving and on some days hating her. my mother now lives in our basement. she has chronic back pain, stomach issues, a brain tumour (not malignant) and suffers from depression and is probably bi polar. she is passive aggressive in her requests/demands and we do everything we can to make her comfortable. yet, nothing is good enough. it’s too hot, it’s too cold, it’s too dusty, it’s too damp, the taps, the lights… etc. she has led a life over the past 20+ years of complaining about her health, telling everything about the meds she takes…it becomes a grating, annoying narrative. her marriage of 30 years is over and she had very little love and support during that time. i am an only child so there is no one else who would care for her, save my wonderful husband. and i find myself feeling resentful… because she spiraled into using percocet, didn’t care for her body and soul, didn’t exercise, didn’t eat properly…and now all she does is sit in front of her computer all day. her teeth are all rotten and she will only agree to a process of a year of extractions before she will get dentures. a year, of one extraction per month basically, because she is afraid of the recovery should she have several teeth out at once. however… i am not changing diapers, i don’t have to lift her in and out of bed, she has her own private space and mostly manages her own appointments, etc. i help… by buying groceries and taking her to the odd appointment. and she has a safe and nice place to live (no cockroaches like the apartment she had found for herself last year, omg!) she used to be a vibrant, talented, and tenacious woman. it is very hard to realize that she is no longer that person, but instead, has withdrawn into her own little world. so…the feelings of resentment are hard to deal with. it’s my mom for god’s sakes! she raised me, partly made me the woman i am today…and yet… i am so mad at her….because she doesn’t have a life any more. i visit her downstairs about 3 or 4 times a day but have gotten to the point that i can only stay for a maximum of 10 minutes, because i cannot listen to the complaints for much longer than that. here’s the rub   once again, i find myself considering ‘therapy’, to learn how to deal and cope with all of this. i sought therapy when my son was abusive to me, i sought therapy when my ex husband was abusive to me, and now this? the people causing me the anguish are never the ones who seek therapy. but i cannot bring myself to utter the words “you are a hypochondriac” to her. (i know that some of her ailments are obviously very real.) i am afraid to be honest because i don’t want to hurt her. i am angry, but i am sad too. i find myself wondering what the next few years will bring. born in to generational “family”of mental illness & domestic violence always distorts, dominates and impacts ongoing. mother largely by choice/skewed perception excuses, ignores, permits/perpetrates abuse & witnesses/endures without action horrific daily assaults perpetuated by husband largely upon her middle aging offspring. i don’t like or admire my mother and try very hard to continue to care and impart kindness. my mother has always held disdain for me expressing that she wished i was never born. in the next breathe she says with what appears unattainable dismay how “exceptionally kind, compassionate & intuitive” i am with her & everyone. as a sensitive, caring and diligent person i have been in the workforce 28yrs, 2 degrees, husband who died when i was 38, no children and spent last 15yrs in/out hospital having some 9 ortho operations. unforseen circumstance has me residing for a roof over my head with parents. nothing is mine & i must do everything. this exposes me to direct demands of increasing caregiving duties whereby i cannot even scratch my own head. well the day has come where the matriarch till recent had me providing to every need & tasks of such personal nature that i’d never imagined would be forceably expected. her ailing/incapable 87yr husband tho primary carer refuses to complete such tasks to support his wife. he looses his temper having her a vulnerable quivering mess. times he’ll throw his walking stick at her bashing her leg to cause large hole/bleeding   warfrin. too many times i’ve been the mother/protector & rescued her. slap covid 19, sibling abuse/rivalry/bullying & 6mths ongoing of nuisance neighbour barking dog german shepherd at 3 6hrs/day non stop i am ready to drop dead. i’ve literally washed daily chronic diarrhoea post longterm antibiotics/hospital for mother. destroyed myself physically on top of bi lateral total knee replacements & heavily plate braced foot/ankle by physical manoeuvres beyond. picked up the bodies multiple times of both parents from major falls. got down on my false knees to perform cpr on mum till emergency ambulance arrived. hijacked by her commanding home visiting doctor recently to bellow at me “your mother says she has depression & inappetance due to the tension between you & your father.” commanding me to be in the same room as her in my home & me unmasked!!! cv19?? wtf i leave room with the doctor shouting “come back here… it might not be true.” wtf. the doctor said mother’s recent xray show no fractures/breaks from recent fall. fast forward 3 aug my sister & i aid 8 paramedics to transport my mother to hospital er at midnight & wait further 4hrs 4am b4 on duty doctor in charge reports & admits her. we cannot visit cv19 precautions. mother has fractured coxic from recent fall, ongoing krf, ra, hiatus hernia   minor operative treatment as she’s not up to major op ever. vomiting, inappetance, immobile/bed ridden, pneumonia, nausea, high bp pain etc. she’s still in hospital. blame it on me though mother. i ring her & yet i don’t want to speak to her as she hangs up. i struggle to hear her voice & she gets turse. we just have nothing to say. i just don’t want to be entangled & drowning. i want to see life & in peace b4 i die. i do have all of the anger and resentment that the other comments outline. the fact that there is no definitive end in site is devastating to deal with. the lack of support from siblings is disrespectful and unkind. i doubt i will speak to my brother or sister again after my mother dies. your life is not your own when a parent lives with you. the relationship with your partner is changed beyond repair. i have been very clear with my mother that i need her to go away for a couple of months to stay with my sister because i need a break after the last 7 years. it doesn’t matter whether i tell her i am falling apart and need time alone with my husband, she just says she can’t do that. it’s all about her. she doesn’t have enough money to pay the exorbitant cost of a retirement home, but her dementia that was diagnosed as mid level two years ago is starting to now deteriorate more rapidly. she is eligible for long term care but of course, i would have to force her into that as she and my siblings don’t see that she’s a problem. i say i will never ask my daughter to do this for me and want to ensure plans are in place should i receive a diagnosis of dementia. the biggest problem right now is that people are not as concerned about their mental health as much as their physical health. there has to be more emphasis on people planning for their senior years both financially and medically. it is not your children’s responsibility to pick up the pieces from a parent’s complete avoidance of future planning. there should be organizations and information in place to guide people as to how to get plans in place. this awareness should be starting at least when a person is in their fifties…probably much sooner. those of us who have let parents into our home are pretty well stuck as there aren’t better structures in place. i know there are seniors programs and caregivers that can come to the home, but honestly, if you can even get your parent to participate, it’s more work for the caregiver to organize. it’s exhausting! we all have to face the facts about aging and take individual responsibility for our futures. with you in solidarity…just want to point out though that just because she never worked for a living doesn’t necessarily mean this is why she is the way she is last minute. let’s keep the working mom spirit separate here…not all who stay home are this absorbed and selfish. i have looked after my mother all my life and today i spent too long having an afternoon with a friend. she asked me to help with some tasks which i did and i said i would go back later which i did. but she was so angry as i had spent ‘too long’ with my friend and i am guessing because i didn’t call her, felt even more angry. my heart sank. i am 60 + which makes it even worse…! thank you so much for this. i can’t express how much these words resonate with me. time to try and let go of unfulfilled expectations…. i came upon this post after doing a random google search and i’m glad i found it. bless you for your honesty, warts and all. i too am dealing with a parent that does some things i just don’t like. my mother is hands down, unequivocally and definitively the most fiscally irresponsible person i have ever met in all my days. and i say that as someone who worked with a woman that took to using muppet like voices to talk to bill collectors that called to get her overdue dough. yes: imagine hearing the person in the next cube twittering over the phone, “carol? no, no carol works here, please stop calling” in their best kermit the frog voice. my mother is worse. she is 73 years old and her credit is in the negatives. she has worked hard all her life (to include retiring not once, not twice, but thrice) and also has social security coming in. she lives in a gated retirement community that is subsidized, so her income covers her rent and expenses 4 times over…but she is horrid. with. money. think having $1500 in the bank and needing $1000 of it to cover bills, but spending $1100. that means that yup i will call my daughter to ask for the other $600 i am now short and using all manner of manipulation tactics to get it. i am so hurt that she feels my money is “disposable”. now, i know what some of you are thinking. you’re thinking, “well gee just say “no”.” well, i’m not nancy reagan and that only works on ’80’s era drug mitigation ads from tv. it’s not that easy especially with a master manipulator that knows every button to press and string to pull to get her way. this includes mentions of “only having one mother in your lifetime” to threats of being out on the streets. my father passed when i was in my early 30’s, so i attribute a lot of giving in to the lamentations of the “she’s all i have left” sentiment. my mother is a boomer that grew up under the “gotta be tough as nails” child rearing of the ’50’s. elders were to be respected (even if they were full of crap). honor thy mother and father (even when they don’t act in a manner worthy of honor). and by all means do as i say, not as i do. when i mentioned the business i planned to start 7 years ago, she put up a fuss. i am a business major and knew i’d be successful, so it didn’t hit me until round 5 of her chiding me over the phone for “risking it all”: it wasn’t me, or the business. it was the threat that starting it would make me financially unstable. that, in turn, would cut into her honeypot and make life inconvenient for her. can’t have that. frankly, i actually ascribe to honoring thy mother and father. the older i get though, i realize that honoring sometimes means saying “no”. the odds of a woman in her ’70’s suddenly “seeing the light” about, y’know, the responsibility to pay the bills you create is slim to none. but i will still love her. that love will just mean that no, you can’t have $300 of my hard earned dough to play the slots at atlantic city this weekend but you’re welcome to find a way to do it on your dime. thanks for sharing. i’m glad we can offer some help. everyone is going through this issue. please know you are not alone i drive 500 miles every 4 5 weeks from my home in colorado to my childhood home in oklahoma. i spend 2 weeks caring for my mom and give her caregivers time off. i have been doing this for 3 years. the anger, resentment and resulting guilt and shame had me googling why i hated taking care of my mom. what i saw as strength and courage in my mom when i was young has morphed into a total control freak. my anger does come from sadness. i am sad that my mom has turned into a needy child which i never wanted. i understand her fear as it is mine, also of dependence and decay. her finances are drained and me and my sisters(3) will need to start ponying up. she needs more care than she can afford and we are all able to help but not always willing. she didn’t save a lot of money and this also breeds resentment. the article is spot on and appreciated. thanks these are tough times especially for responsible daughters. know you will get through this. and that you are not alone tami you are heard and your issues are real tami. i am glad we are able to offer you a bit of supportive perspective. i needed this article and your comments today. i have been trying so hard to deal with these feelings…meditation, therapy, support groups, medication, writing, etc. maybe i am a slow learner, i don’t now. for today, while i empathize with all you are going through, i don’t feel alone. my mother is a horder on top of having dementia and i have taken care of my parents and helped them out, lived with them on and off and moved in with mom when dad passed away. i have a sister who lives 3 miles a way and has only been to the house 2x in 25 yrs. i am the one here, doing everything. and watching mom slowly go down hill. i feel lime i don’t even have a life. my mom has never been a house cleaner & we live different. she is non complaint with me about everything. i have my own health issues and i literally feel like i’m losing my mind. steph: many women are in the same boat as you are. that’s why we had our writer do this very honest story. can you please find a support group near you or online that you can share your issues with? honestly, accepting help is part of getting through this. you should not have to carry this by yourself. thanks for this. all situations are different but the similarities are there. i feel like i am dragging two large boulders around all the time (mom and dad). i never wanted this role and am angry and resentful. also depressed and hopeless and sometime hateful. my mom has been self centered her whole life, loving us kids a lot but much more concerned for herself and her needs. she wanted to be close friends and use me as a support starting when i was about 10. when she tries to draw close, i want to run. now her friends are dead and she is a mass of complaints, resentments and loneliness. every conversation throws me into a tailspin. one of my brothers handles it better, one even worse. my father was a benign guy, very passive, and in that passivity, also not there for us kids. loving, yes, but not supportive. he now needs a full time caregiver and total management of everything and thank goodness for one of my brothers who shares it and for some cash that makes the full time caregiver possible for now. i wish both my parents would lie down one night soon and die peacefully. my father (92) knows his life is at it’s end and he may be ready, but each emergency intervention takes a toll on him and on the rest of us. my mother (86) is a major annoyance. she is more capable than my father but is slipping (they are divorced and have been since i was small). my father’s complaints have faded. but my mother’s complaints are loud. thanks for listening. some of the suggestions are good! everything you have said i am experiencing, i will have such guilt when my mother leaves this earth… but while she is here she makes me so angry.. she is so needy and the more help she has the more she wants. she is attention seeking and i’m at my wits end know what steps i can take. to read that someone feels the same and to see others are going through similar situations makes me feel that my feelings and emotions are not that alien. thank you so much ❤️ thank you, thank you, thank you  my biggest fear is that i will turn into (or perhaps i already have ) unappreciative, complaining, anger inducing mother. i’m sorry but oh so grateful to know i’m not alone in my feelings towards my mother. she is handicapped (can’t walk) so requires 24/7 help which we have someone we can barely afford and is getting beaten down by my moms constant demands (my mom doesn’t ask  she demands as “her parents did to their children   they were told what to do not asked politely. can’t i just have a nice mom who is kind and pleasant to people  she accuses everyone of subterfuge. i was about to post another page of complaints about my mom (that answers the above question) when all i meant to say was thank you for your post and well needed companionship. my mother lives with me and my husband. we are in our 70s. she is in her 90s. she treats us like servants. if i’d known how long she’d live i’d never have taken her in. will i be 80 before i’m free of her silliness, her demands and her total lack of understanding. she never, ever thinks what it’s like for us. together my husband and i created a lovely home from a wreck and we both now hate it. she has had her life and we should have what’s left of ours. i have told my children i will never do this to them and i mean it. i am so resentful. i should have had an inheritance by now and will probably get nothing. not that i even care any more. not one person has commented on those many mums/parents that are the total opposite of what you are all describing. i have one daughter who wanted for nothing when growing up and she fully admits it, and is proud tof tell all about her great loving upbringing when her only worry was to be doing what she should be for her age. she is now in early forties and has her own 5 kids, my 1st born granddaughter is 30wks pregnant with a baby boy..needless to say that i absolutely doted on these children.. i was never without them, they were my life. i worked hard so they also could ask nanna for anything and was there for them no matter what! …however, my health was taking its toll, and i got triple negative breast cancer at age 42 and have battled it for 19yrs..due to aggressive treatments i’ve got heart and lung disease, arterial disease, top to toe arthritis and the list goes on and on.. i now have multiple myeloma and have suffered greatly for the past 6yrs as it’s a 1% rare type.. now here’s the good bit.. i downsized to a smaller house, bigger garden as my mobility got worse in 2015..this was just after i had spent my 1st christmas alone. the kids popped in for 5 mins to pick up gifts and borrow some veg and gravy maker, my poor health wasn’t their fault, if i couldn’t get ready and go for dinner that was my problem. that was just the beginning, i have since been left “to bat on with it”they (and rightly so) have their own lives to live and they’re not being put out of they’re way for anyone! not even nanna who gave her life up for them.. except when they want money, i am graced with a request by text and them picking it up was classed as a visit! how lucky i am you must be thinking, but don’t be to envious. i have been a sociable, love life kind of person all my days. i have been dumped and left on my own now almost all of the last 6yrs.. they live 10 mins walk from here and they don’t even ask if i need a pint of milk bringing over while they’re out shopping.. i dread each day i wake up! i sit alone 24hrs a day 7 days a week 365 days a year! i only get out to appointments and it takes me almost a week to get ready. i don’t see my parents or sisters as i don’t dare let them see how i look or how bad my home looks.. i have lied to them every which way so they don’t see the way i’m being treated by my daughter and her family..each and every chence i get, when i can look better (not often) i visit my mum and dad and meet the girls there, while they suspiciously look at me but are to polite to ask what i am hiding from them, they would never dream that im going through this nightmare.. i sob uncontrollably , making for an embaressing drive home with my uber cab driver every time i have to leave my lovely mum who misses me like hell, and who pretends to understand, but she doesn’t…one of my sisters has recently found out a bit of it all but i have begged her to say nothing and sworn her to secrecy. she recognised some of my jewellery that someone had bought cheaply and came to see me so fast , she must have met herself on the way back, but that’s another story.. i’m on treatment now with a kinder chemo but my bones are on their last legs (being plasma cell bone marrow cancer) and other organs are involved now. you must be wondering why they would do this to a good mum and grandma?.. one word ” money”!! they want it now and if i don’t give it they’re going to take it!! so this artitle and comments broke my heart, it’s me in reverse! please don’t hate your mum’s, they’re likely terrified that they will become me?! after all, if they never gave anything, they did at least give you life.. :)xxx .. i had to do a double take because it was as if i wrote the article. and then all the comments, wow, so many people feel the exact same way i do. my friends tell me i’m so lucky i still have my mom. most of my friends lost their moms fairly young, in their 50’s and 60′. my mom is 87, physically very healthy but has dementia. my sis and i take turns taking care of her in our homes but i can’t stand it anymore. i want my house back. i want my privacy with my husband back. i want to go out and enjoy my life while i still can. i’m 52. everything about her bothers me. she stares at us when we eat. she asks the same questions 25 times a day. she farts. she hangs her panties on the window for all to see. she stares at my neighbors through the window, so many other annoyances. i just don’t enjoy her company one bit. i don’t enjoy talking to her. she never drank, smoked, and always ate healthy so her body is healthy which means she has a lot more years left and guess who’s stuck with her for a lot more years? what good is it to be healthy and live a long life if you get dementia and can’t take care of yourself? everyone says life is short but people are living really long lives nowadays and daughters are usuallt the ones getting stuck with their moms and resenting every second of it. i’m lucky my sis helps a lot but i’m ready to place mom in a nursing home. i already told my son i don’t want him taking care of me if i make it to 87. i told him to go enjoy his life and be adventurous and have fun. i’ll check myself into a nursing home and play bingo and square dance 🙂 you do have the power to say no and you don’t have to feel guilty. you are not responsible for your mother. i’m convinced most women have children just so they have someone to take care of them one day so if that is what she thought she was getting out of the deal, that’s on her. you, as an embryo, never agreed to it. say no. block her calls. block her messages. block threats of suicide and homelessness and live your own life no matter what happens to her. if you decide to help her and feel angry for it, that is on you. thank you to the person who wrote this. beyond just offering perspective (my relationship with my parents is nowhere near the vicinity of yours), it helped me to revisit my anger and frustration with a calmer analysis. my parents were attentive in my raising, though both working so very busy. so much so that under their guidance i was brought up to be very self reliant and independent. they were supportive of me and my siblings, even well into adulthood, to the point of having very little for themselves when they retired. i cant stress how selfless tgey have been. and now that they are in their twilight, i knew it was my turn to give back, be the good son. because i love them so much, and they’ve never asked for anything. in fact i insisted. i built a suite for them on our home, set them up, had them involved in the decisions  etc. and for about 5 years everything was great. but once our children left the nest it started to change. slowly at first. but building over time  a horrid, secret resentment. and its grown so that now and then it spews out as audible sighs or short response over trivial interactions. they talk just to fill the silence, or do things that make more work for me than i or my wife already have. but i know this  it isn’t them  its all me. i believe the bulk of my anger stems from their inability to be self reliant, and the frustration that they raised me to be so why cant they walk their own walk? and i know im being petty and unreasonable. which only compounds the anger further. i feel like such a shit sometimes, and it keeps me awake at night. because even though i know this isn’t the real me, im afraid that this is the new me. and that makes me think i am a horrible son. anyhow, thank you for sharing. reading the above doesn’t sound like it, but it really helped. this last post is unfortunately how i feel. i would just like to walk away from the pain that is my life. by life i mean my early years. it is very hard to care for someone who caused you so much pain. the one person that was supposed to be there for you left you to fend for yourself because she couldn’t even take care of herself. so self absorbed that she couldn’t even care for her 3 children myself being the youngest. i was almost hit by a semi truck at the age of three because my mother wasn’t watching me and i got out of the house and on the road. really?!!!! what mother lets their 3 year old out of there sight for a second?!!! she was so self absorbed that she didn’t even know that i wasn’t in her sight. she was so consumed with my cheating father that she could think of nothing else but her own pain. i’m sorry but if i can put my crap aside and give my all to my 2 daughters and put them ahead of myself then she could have done the same. i came through such horrible abuse but still managed to put my daughters first as it should be. they didn’t ask to be born so you should have the utmost respect and treat them right. this is why i just want to through my hands up and walk away. the verbal abuse just continued into my adulthood and i am so sick of hurting. i am worth more than that. i am important too. thank you all…today was one of those days with my mother. she 76 and loves to gamble, talk shit about family members and wonders why no one visits her. she’s done some awful shit through out her life and if she’s ever helped you she throws it in you face whenever possible. everyone steals from her and everyone is out to get her. growing up i could never remember a time we shopped together or visited a salon she only chased the mighty dollar and her own happiness. thank you all for your honesty we are never alone in life!!! omg!!! for a minute, i thought i wrote this! thank you, thank you, thank you for this article. aging is a torture for all humans. but these people, without any passion in life, these superficial people who only know complaining, comparing others, cheating, lying  are the real tortures. i am being slowly killed by my mother too. i wish i wasn’t born  hi bella: i understand the overwhelming state of your affairs with your mom. find someone to talk to about this. it is a problem many people face: you are not alone. a good counselor will give you ways to handle her better. my mom just turned 49 and for 5 years now complains about people not helping. but goes out and does things she wants to do with no problem. she got hurt on the job but claims she’s unfit to do anything else. she also has bad spending habits with the little money she does get and the money people give her sometimes goes to the wrong thing. i just want to finish college so i can really help and not get stuck living with her and a dead end job taking care of yourself is a way to help your mother. get going in that direction and you will find it beneficial to you both. this is very helpful to read all this. i’m glad i’m not alone. that is important to not feel alone. my father died suddenly in 2016. he wasn’t supposed to be the one to go first. my mother is the one who had open heart surgery, dementia, thyroid issues, parkinson’s, incontinence issues, and acid reflux. we all thought my father would outlive my mother but that’s not what happened. my mother is incapable of everything. she has been living with me for 4 years straight. 24/7. i’m resentful and extremely sad this is how my life turned out. it’s not rewarding nor is it happy. from the onset, my family deserted me. i don’t get along with them and personally hope they all end up in hell where they belong. not a call to ask if she needs anything or a visit. because they hate me, they are rotten to my mother. i pray every day for this to end. it’s a prison sentence and hell for one person to do this. this article and comments are raw, honest, and so very, very human. as you can see, they aren’t uncommon, just unspoken. we’ve been conditioned to be “nice,” and not share thoughts or emotions that don’t match that exterior. i work with family caregivers, having been one myself. i get how hard it can be at so many levels. you become angry, depleted, and fearful about how you will lash out. sometimes we do. but, it leaves us feeling worse than before. covey club has a caregiver room and i moderate the space. i would invite you to join us using the app to share your concerns, feelings, and needs. in turn, you will not be judged. it’s a safe space to share. i find caregivers to be relentlessly supportive of one another and share their best solutions without forcing them upon anyone. i’m game to build a community that can move us beyond the essay and creates full ness for caregivers. here is one resource that might be helpful. this is a free caregiver study designed to utilize mindfulness techniques to help reduce caregiver stress and distress. it begins in april 2021. please take a look. i will be posting more ideas here or in the caregiver collective in the covey club app. https://zencaregiving.org/caregiver study/ all your stories have something of mine. my mother couldn’t take care of herself either, and i was her emotional crutch from my early teens. always made to feel that my needs took second place to hers. unable to cope with behavior contradictory to her assumptions. in my twenties i felt forty, and needed to be out of her suffocating orbit to be myself. but, i did make a life for myself although made to feel guilty about it in the passive aggressive way she was a master in. funny, as many of you also say, she was critical about the way i took care of my children, allowing them the space to be children. not heaping the wrong kind of responsibilities on them. they have turned out to be loving and caring. they also give my husband and me the impression that they actually enjoy our company. this is something that never fails to surprise me, as i just absolutely hate being around my mother. she’s 96 now and suffers from the onset of dementia. she’s always been lonely so filled her life with friends, now they’re all dead and gone or unable to visit. now she wants to move in with me, but i’m not going to do that because i don’t want to be miserable. i visit regularly and pay caregivers (much, much more than i can afford) but i’d rather do without than sacrifice my sanity. she put herself first when i was young and at her mercy, and actually did something terrible to me when i was too young to protect myself. these are the kind of women who are obsessed by their ‘weak’ health but are in fact strong and healthy and living long past their sell by dates. they’re sad and frightened to die because they know they wasted their lives. it took me a very long time to get where i’m now, but at 69 i wait for the day she’ll no longer be around. i no longer feel guilty for this wish either. thank you for your comment, serene. i’m sorry your mom was not more self aware. this was the case for many women in her generation. this wonderful raw and honest article….and the list of subsequent replies has hit bullseye after bullseye with me. i live with my elderly mother who since i moved in with her.. has simply taken a back seat on life… i now cook, clean, shop garden and have become an unpaid and mainly unappreciated live in maid. although like tonight when my anger erupts and i tackle the more than sticky subject of why she does ‘’nothing” apart from watch tv and contributes zero to the daily tasks she replies “i never asked you to do anything’’ and totally refuses to see my frustration or sadness. your article made me see realise i wasn’t alone and the only person who can change the situation is me. however guilty and selfish …we only get one life and why should i let my mother suffocate and diminish mine. i have no idea how to alter the mess i’ve found myself in. any help would be appreciated. thank you. hi karen: i’m sorry you find yourself in this situation which afflicts so many of our generation. here is a starter guide to self help. follow their lead and look for support groups near you. you deserve that: https://www.helpguide.org/articles/parenting family/family caregiving.htm i am so grateful to have found this site. i’m going through such a tough time with my mother and reading all of these stories has made me feel so not alone in this. the last several weekends my sister and i have been by my mothers place cleaning, doing laundry. buying groceries etc. mom is 89 and in denial about needing help. it is just too much to deal with. i’ve somewhat convinced her to give home care a try because i lied and told her the neighbors called adult services because they were concerned about an elderly woman that couldn’t care for herself. i told her it was either home care or she would have to go into a nursing home. her house wreaks of urine, she refuses to let us wash her or at least assist. she’s developed a real incontinence problem where i find myself mopping urine from the floor. in addition, she threw out her dentures, it took me five appointments with her to get those dentures and i’ll be damned if i’m going through that again. she also had a pot of rotten food on the stove, with more rotten food in the fridge. it appears she has been taking things out of the freezer to prepare and then forgets all about it. i work full time, going to work early and getting home late. i don’t have time to get to her home during the week. my brother, the cocksucker, excuse me, simply couldn’t “deal” and doesn’t do anything for her. sure, ignore it and it will just go away. i hope his hell is waiting for him. i’m so stressed all the time and feel so angry with her when she tries to argue that she’s managing. no you’re not! listen to me you old bag!! i’ve often had thoughts of wishing she would just die already. it would be such a relief. i’m dreading seeing her this weekend as i know i will be entering her urine scented apartment with her bags of laundry just waiting for me. i’ve arranged for a laundry service today. to hell with that. it’s too time consuming. my time! i’m doing what i can but don’t know what i will do if home care doesn’t work out. i’m at my wits end. thank you for this. i really needed to vent. hi estelle: you are not alone. this is a common problem. please look for a self care group. you need a place to vent and some local help with what to do next. check the other answers to comments here where i placed a link to a great self care guide. it sounds to me like it’s time for your mother to move to a facility where they can care for her, regardless of her own thoughts about it. thank you for commenting. i’m 87 and i live by myself and i still have interest in lots of things my health is not what it used to be and my mind is still good there’s one thing that i absolutely don’t want in life i don’t want to live with my children i don’t want to fuss i don’t want to complain all the time i just want to enjoy the time that i have left when the time comes if it does that i can’t take care of myself i’m more than willing to go in a nursing home i’m sure i’ve had faults in the past but haven’t we all i would love to have the money to go into assisted living now but i don’t so i have to make the best of what i’ve got. i just don’t want to get in the circle where my kids hate me i just don’t want them to be a caretaker all i ask is that they come and see me once in awhile and i just hope that god grants me this thank you today i yelled at my mother   she is 78 and been living with me for the past 14 years. i sat at this laptop and could not work because i felt so guilty. so i hit google and this article by “anonymous” popped up. what a relief to find that i am not the only person going through 20 million emotions in one day. i am the eldest and i have 2 sisters who in mom’s eyes can do no wrong, but me, the person who promised her that she will never go to a retirement village, has put a roof over her head and food in her mouth and loved her unconditionally, does nothing right. i work my butt off   she does not want help around the house because she trust no one so i vac, clean, mow (1000 sq meters) and do all the diy around the house. (i am constantly reminded by mom of what still has to be done).i also have a job that keeps me busy until 10:00 in the evenings. i have had murderous thoughts, i have had thoughts of self destruction   just to get myself out of this situation i find myself in. thank you!!! you have made me realise that i still love her but i need to develop a thick skin and become selectively deaf when it comes to mom being critical and cynical. most of all   you made me realise that i am not a bad person   just human. total,total nightmare,everyday i get up and take take of mother,that dear,sweet 89 year old that never gave a rats arse about me,used me as her councillor for years,complaining about my dad or my alcoholic brother,whose drinking career was financed by her,self absorbed passive aggressive narcissist,and that’s just her good points eh. apparently she prays the lord will take her in her sleep,let’s hope he does before i do,haha,i’m joking of course,if i didn’t try to cheer myself up somehow i will be hoping for the lord to take me i just typed into google “i hate my elderly mother” and i’m so glad i did because i found you all….! my mum has always lived with me apart from 7 years reprieve when i basically had a breakdown and she went to live with my aunt and i’m now 61. she wasnt supportive or kind to me when i was younger….called md a slag because i slept with my boyfriend….ran out of the house threatening to kill herself ( if only). get the picture? this morning she messed herself then walked up the stairs treading it all in…i didnt shout but cried….to which she said i was crying over my son…who has made me cry in the past but she used him to deflect from herself. i internalised the anger wasnting to hurt myself….i am s horrible person…she is 98. yes, yes, yes! i love my mom and step dad and spent six years convincing them to move closer to my family, but now i am constantly regretting that decision. we live just is half a mile apart and i now fantasize about the time when we were eight hours apart. my aging mother and stepfather expect way too much from me. i have four kids of my own and a busy family and while i try to help consistently throughout the week providing meals and cleaning and driving them to their appointments 1 around my own insane schedule for our family of six  it absolutely throws me off completely off when my mom seems to expect for me to drop everything at a moments notice requesting help to vacuum (for a third time this week) when i have not vacuumed or mopped my own house for two weeks. it’s as though it is expected and help is just assumed   without ever asking for permission. i want to be here to support her and this is why i wanted her closer during this season, but i didn’t expect her to be this reliant and dependent and insistent that my family serve them   over our own lives. often at the expense of all four of my children to satisfy their needs? that is where i start to feel the resentment and bitterness set in. she seems so disconnected or even judgmental when i remind her we are “busy” doing what kids this age do such as soccer saturdays. that is normal and i dream of space from and apart from them so i can just focus on my family without being responsible for my parents. sounds like it’s time for some boundary setting from your parents. we have done some great discussions of that at coveyclub and it’s very helpful. just because they are your parents, does not mean you don’t get to have boundaries. wow!! it’s not just me!!! my mother destroyed my childhood after taking me from grandmother when i was seven. i got away from her at 16 and managed to build a beautiful life. when i had my children she came to live in the same town as me, (but not close enough to be of any help just close enough that we had to run around after her), and i proceeded to allow her to ruin another three decades of my life. i didn’t think i had the right to deny my children a grandmother. shame she couldn’t be one and proceeded to treat my daughter in the same ways she did me. she loved my son though, as she did her own son who was a total nutcase, abusive to me and her and hasn’t had contact with her in 30 years. i tried cutting her out several times but something would always happen and i’d get a phone call saying “your mother has had a car accident (minor), health incident etc and you have to do something. i always ask myself why no one told her she had to look after me when i was young and vulnerable? seems once you have grey hair you are and always have been a saint on earth. any way i did manage to get her into aged care when her dementia got too bad for her to refuse anymore. the aged care is terrible and i hate it. i keep an eye on them and hold them to account and go through phases of visiting and then not. usually keep phone contact up very frequently except sometimes when i just can’t because my anger overwhelms me. mainly holiday times, as now, easter. i made so many allowances for her and my children’s father that i let my own life with my children fall second. holidays always had to accommodate what they both needed so there was never time left for the three of us and now i find my son slipping away with very little tradition in our own tiny family to hold him. it breaks my heart. their father and my mother i see now are so similar and even though i broke away from them both very early they still impacted us in the end. i want to feel okay about what i feel and then i’d be okay 🥲 a wonderful article. just knowing that i am not alone in having such a dislike for my negative, lazy, selfish and narcsisstic elderly mother, makes me feel less guilty. the whole point is to realize this is not just you. this is a very difficult situation that neither parents nor daughters could have imagined or wished for. this comment section and this article are incredibly validating. i have always been the default caregiver to my mother. i cannot stand it and literally dream of running away. i know that i will likely lose my wonderful boyfriend because i am too responsible for others to have ample time for him. i have worked diligently this last year to prepare to sell my home, which she lives in, and find us both other places to be for my sanity and future financial safety. i have looked into care facilities which are so expensive it’s frightening. i am looking at a 4 acre property with a 2 family and separate in law house on it just to get some distance! it won’t be enough but her 6 feet from my kitchen is killing me. when i expressed my distressed emotional situation in february, she said “you think you’re depressed? what about me?” my heart just collapsed knowing i will never get validation from a her, never a thank you that is genuine, never a true understanding of who i am or what my needs are. she doesn’t have it in her. ironically, on my father’s death bed, she said the same about him and how she wished she hadn’t waited for him to change. i wonder why i still wait. beautifully painted aj. we understand entirely. we published this piece so everyone could feel validated. this is an issue no one expected (on either side) and no one prepared for. hang in there. wonderful and timely article. i bear the brunt of most of the caregiving for my 83 year old legally blind, narcissistic mother who has borderline personality disorder. like many who have responded, she did not really parent me and words can’t say how much i hate and resent having to take care of her needs, listen to her endless complaints and do my best not to let guilt swallow me whole. to say she is difficult is putting it extremely mildly. i have one sibling who lives in a state on the opposite coast and while he calls her 1x a week he doesn’t shoulder much more than that. he will if i ask but then i feel like i am also having to manage that. last fall we gave my mother an ultimatum since her ability to live “independently” was completely dependent on my being her caregiver (we lived 25 miles apart). she had the option of moving in to a private pay assisted living facility or to remain at home but if she were to remain at home i was going to turn all of her care over to a geriatric care manager which she would have to pay for with her own savings. we explained to her that, while the option was hers, the downside of the latter is that when her $$ ran out it would be difficult to find a decent nursing home for her to move in to. she chose the assisted living facility although reminds me regularly, while she recites an endless litany of complaints about the place, that i “put her there”. i can say that most of the time i really feel like i hate her. were she not my mother i would definitely not choose to be in a relationship with her. most people don’t. at my worst i argue with her and yes i do say unkind things at times. at my best i keep my mouth shut and let her rant and rant and rant and don’t try to persuade her that life is not the shit hole she perceives it to be. i wish i could say i give her hugs or try to make her feel better or compliment her or anything like that but truth be told it is hard to do and doesn’t feel good. i am in therapy and trying to find a place of serenity amidst this. anyway, didn’t mean to go on for so long but just to say i really appreciate knowing that i am not alone and it is not shameful to say this sucks and i didn’t have to deal with it. you are definitely not alone kim. hang in there. therapy for you is a great service to lean on. wow! the freedom to let go of the guilt!! thank you! yes. you are free. no guilt. we all have the same issues and feelings. xo so glad to see that we’re starting to find the courage to step away from the pearl clutching about wanting to be free of elderly parents, so many of whom have already given us years of irreparable abuse, denigration, and terror. my mother has done her best to make my first 56 years as miserable as she could manage. the day she dies will be the greatest day of my life. i pray daily for the strength to be the best person i can be until that blessed salvation arrives. i’ve always said: just because they are your parents doesn’t mean they are good for you. i’m sorry that this is your truth. it was mine as well. as many on here, stumbled across this page when googling for advice after getting to the end of my tether. in my case, i have somehow ended up being the sole caregiver to my narcissistic stepmother, this is my worst nightmare and i don’t know how i let myself get in this situation. i feel trapped, stuck, anxious, overwhelmed, used and have to work hard on myself every day to not go crazy. i am a single mother, with 2 brothers, initially about 7 years ago, i gave up my own house as suggested by my father, i only lived down the road and moved into my fathers house with my daughter, as i already helped them a lot anyway and he said it would be better for me financially, my stepmother also came crying to me saying she couldn’t cope anymore with looking after my dad or doing housework. my natural mother died when i was 4 and dad married my stepmother when i was 12, we never got on, she emotionally, mentally and physically abused me, treated me differently from my 2 brothers and also turned my brothers and dad against me, even my nan said she used me as her slave, after an eating disorder and suicide attempt i left home at 18 and finally felt free. fast forward to today, dad was very ill, i loved him dearly and wanted to look after him, dad was similar to me and i also ended up in a narcissistic relationship which i only just got out of. dad died 1 and 1/2 years ago, he didn’t make a will and so step mum got everything, even though i’ve put so much of my own money into decorating and fixing this house. stepmother loves this power over me, my daughter now an adult and left home, younger brother takes care of step mothers finances, but doesn’t visit much or do anything round the house, just has a nice chat, eats and leaves, older brother lives far away and barely see him, i do everything for stepmother who has multiple illnesses and get no appreciation, she makes stuff up and lies, bitches behind everyone’s backs, including dads when he was still alive, she makes no sense most of the time, says she can’t do things, but then perfectly capable of doing the things she wants. i don’t know what to do anymore, covid really hasn’t helped, just given her more excuses to be more needy and always tries to make me feel sorry for her, very self centred and talks about herself constantly, not at all interested in mine or my daughters lives, my daughter said i should just leave her. i’m pretty sure stepmother has absolutely no idea how i feel and thinks our relationship is okay and normal, she never listens to me and talks about herself or gossips or people on soaps if i ever try and talk about myself or even my daughter, i don’t know how my dad put up with her for so long and realise now how dumb and useless she really is. i do still feel bad for saying all this, i have wanted and tried to have a good relationship with her, but it’s impossible, she’s so ‘nice’ in public and to other people, it’s so unfair i need to leave for the sake of my mental health, but know for a fact she can’t survive on her own and no one else would ever do for her what i do, but she doesn’t appreciate it at all just takes advantage of my kind caring nature and the fact that i have no job or place to live except here, as i gave up my house and job to look after her and dad. so good to read others experiences and vent on here, as sure my daughter and best friend are sick of my moaning, don’t feel so alone now. charlotte: you are not alone. i would suggest you look into getting some kind of counseling so you don’t feel so overwhelmed. perhaps you could get the right steps to begin speaking up to your stepmother about how you really feel. you never know what will come of it. i had a stepmother who treated me miserably and many years later confronted her with it. she was shocked and didn’t know she had done so much damage. i was able to forgive her after we had several awkward conversations later in life. i have severe issues with the same problems everyone on this page is having i love my mother but i hate her i resent her, i wasn’t taken care of and feel so guilty all the time i know god’s going to put me in hell. i lost my husband a few years ago now i’m just trying to make peace and enjoy my retirement years and i’m stuck having to take care of her and my stepfather with no help from my sibling. i hate it i do everything i can for them and all she does is complain or yell at me or try to make me feel sorry for her and i know she’s suffering all she does is repeat herself over and over again with her dementia and it’s driving me insane. i have bipolar ptsd and anxiety order since i was young and i think i’m gonna end up dying before her. i lost my husband a few years ago now i’m just trying to make peace and enjoy my retirement years and i’m stuck having to take care of her and my stepfather with no help from my sibling. i hate it i do everything i can for them and all she does is complain or yell at me or try to make me feel sorry for her and i know she’s suffering all she does is repeat herself over and over again with her dementia and it’s driving me insane. i have bipolar ptsd and anxiety order since i was young and i think i’m gonna end up dying before her. of course i don’t want her dead but i want to put in a nursing home and i can’t get her in one and they can’t afford assisted living. i got her help for medicaid. i can’t get my own housework and yardwork done in a constant worry and guilt of killing me i don’t enjoy any time with my friends anymore i’m depressed all i wanna do is stay in bed. i got her help for medicaid. i can’t get my own housework and yardwork done in a constant worry and guilt of killing me i don’t enjoy any time with my friends anymore i’m depressed all i wanna do is stay in bed how can you hate somebody that you love and they have placed their burden on you how can you hate somebody that you love and they have placed their burden on you? thank you. im only 33, but definitely nowhere near living the life i had planned as my mom’s decisions in life have impacted me negatively so much so she now lives with me, and i have to care for her at least economically. she’s 75, we get along but there is resentment on my part towards her, as i see time going by and me not being able to do what i want to do because my money goes into caring for both of us. this includes food for 2,a house with 2 rooms, etc. for the past 3 years i’ve thought about how much longer she’ll be around. like the op, i tell myself that she’ll eventually be gone so i might as well be grateful and loving, but again: time keeps going by and i’m stuck. i can’t move abroad, my rent is expensive, she’s always complaining about something, i’m never good enough, etc. and it makes me bitter. i pay for a house i can’t even bring a date to. actually dating for me is non existent because i’m ashamed to tell others that my mom lives with me! i feel like such a failure. all i dream about is everything i’d like to do once she’s gone. “i’ll finally be able to start my life!”. i’ve even started saving money so when the time comes, i can quit my job and travel (my passion in life which has been on hold for years). hell, im not even happy with my job, but it pays the goddamn bills. so thank you for posting this. i feel less alone. thank you for posting this. i feel less alone now. my story isn’t much different. i’ve taken care of my mom since i was 12. i was the oldest daughter, but #5 child behind 4 brothers. when she couldn’t find a job (complained it was age discrimination) i employed her and paid her more than the job was worth, hoping she’d plan for her later years. i still paid for her housing. her complaints never stopped and she spent all her money. she was the victim always… the world was out to get her. after the end of my marriage and the sale of our home where she lived in our guest house for 10 years i moved her with me and put a small bungalow on my new property. i knew we couldn’t live under the same roof. i thought she’d enjoy her golden years and i only needed to be sure she was safe and cared for. then 5 years ago the dementia creeped in. i’ve been chained to her since, unable to enjoy my own retirement the way i want and making my day be around all her needs and schedule. she’s not an awful person to be around, she is pretty sweet in her dementia, but the demands and sacrifice are without relief. after taking care of her for over 50 years, i just want to be free of the responsibility and sacrifices. i just want my life to be mine… my children are grown and i am otherwise unencumbered by a spouse and have just retired. am i not entitled to my own life? nope. not as long as mom, without her mind but with a healthy body, is no more… like many, i googled “i dislike my mother”, though i expected not to find anything of much use. surprise!!! i am so delighted to know i am not alone and it is okay for me to have these feelings. growing up in so much dysfunction i felt neither nurtured nor loved by any member of my household (mother, father, sister) nor by many members of the immediate family. mother was too busy attending to the needs of my womanizing, alcoholic, gambling father and my sister (who was later in adulthood diagnosed bipolar, schizophrenic, paranoid). during therapy, i realized my mother was grooming me, from an early age, to be her “best friend” and the “go to” person to accommodate her needs as she saw fit. i always had to “fix” what was going wrong in her life, especially where my sister was involved. i was always the emotional support though i never got the support i needed. mother was such an enabler to my sister’s erratic behavior, she could never do any wrong. ohhh, the stories i could tell. i never knew how to love myself and looked for love outside (naturally, all the wrong places). too busy trying to please my mother to get the approval/attention she gave to my sister. during therapy it was brought out that my mother didn’t like me … heck, she probably didn’t like herself. i left the state putting approximately 1400 miles between us. little did i realize until years later, i needed more than physical distance, i needed emotional/mental distance. my son was responsible for bringing mother for a “visit” and she ended up staying/living with him. after some time she had reasons for wanting live with me, much to my dismay. my fault, i should have said “hell no!!!” while working full time and taking care of her and the all the housework, she did nothing except watch tv and go through my things while i was at work. quite contrary to her behavior with my sister, who by the way committed suicide   that’s another story. her attitude at times was so nasty i gave up on the kisses/hugs (especially after one cheek kiss she remarked to me “judas was betrayed by a kiss”. then when she called me a bitch … i had had it ~ i was done. i had a recurrence of breast cancer in 2019, she was unsupportive, didn’t call weeks before my nor the day of to wish me luck on my surgery … nothing. complained to my son i wasn’t speaking to her. wow! now, due to her lack of self care) she needs 24 hour care. i am not the one!!! i am working on forgiving her, not for her but for me. i prefer to have peace for whatever time i have left on this earth. my son ( since he saw fit to bring her here) will have to work it out as she is too stressful for me to deal with. i love my son dearly and will assist him in whatever way that allows me to remain at peace. when i hear people speak of how great their mothers were, i am happy for them, smile and am silent. if you read this, thank you for allowing me to vent. this article came at the right time for me, just had another arguement with my almost 100 yr old father because i had to cancel my visit today for someone to come and fix my roof. my needs do not exist in his world. i feel like i am hanging on to sanity by a thread and have given up hope of ever getting my life back after 26 years of caring for first my mother, then my father. i am 66 and still waiting to have my life. i cannot believe how much they have taken from me or how much i have sacrificed to try to be a good daughter. it is like a black hole..i have been swallowed up. thank you so much for sharing your feelings…i was feeling like such a bad person but now realise i am not alone. this is wrong though surely…and notice that it is all women in this position😔 oh thank you for this! my mom just came back from surgery. she will recover assuming she doesn’t over martyr herself. i lost my temper with her because she apparently assumed that her husband got fed by god and his and her clothes magically got washed and her plants magically stayed alive and ‘don’t you feel how dirty the floor is?’ after i have been pulling 16 hour days while fighting insomnia. that was her only comment to me. no thank yous or anything. well. granted i know i will never live up to her expectations. i could literally be her slave and i still would not be a good enough daughter. that’s because she has told me how wonderful daughters of othrr people are. how happy they make their mothers. unlike me. but i know she needs me now. and its not like we want her to end back up in hospital. so i shall do my duty. because i love her even if she doesn’t love me. and i accept that. wrestling with the belief that she does is only gonna undo any strength i hve found these past years to be my own person. to the op. thanks for this. its calming to know i am not the only one. can i be your 11th friend? my expressions are similar to most others. i’m angry, lonely and at my breaking point. thank you for saying what we all find so hard to say and then feel guilty for saying. i’m so happy to find this article and these comments that don’t make me feel like a terrible person for feeling like i do. my mother is 81 and suffers from ipf. she has an oxygen concentrator 24/7. if we leave the house for appointments etc., we are always scared the portable will fail and she’ll die. she demands that i come over her house (she’s a hoarder, and has dogs in the house), wants me to clean the dog poop and pee from the floors, do laundry, vacuum, dishes, empty trash, etc. she sits on the couch and watches shopping shows. when i finally sit down to take a rest, she notices a rubber band across the room on the floor and demands that i get up and pick it up now. she has cats and a very large yard which requires attention, she thinks i’m a man who can pull all of those weeds and trim trees. she’s too cheap to hire people to help. she talks terribly about family members. i have a son who is disabled and needs me too, and she tells me “he can figure out his own meal, you’re helping me now!” she pretends she can’t do things, i do it for her, then i find out she was capable. manipulation is her game. at first i asked her several times to come and live with me, she refused and now i’m so happy she refused, the offer will not be put on the table again. i love my husband and my home and i’m not willing to sacrifice it for her. she has money saved and won’t part with a penny, so let’s see what happens. my older sister was always her favorite and now, not even she wants her. if anything else, this whole reading experience has opened my eyes about what not to do do to my children when i get old. thanks. i am the mid 60s baby boomer who is now in a nursing home. i know it is best to be here and not living with my daughter. we tried that when i was still working and didn’t have vascular dementia. i don’t know if the parents being talked about can see any of their annoying behavior. my daughter told me her feelings and i didn’t know what to say. i found this site and sent it to her. she said it was helpful. i would feel like many of these people if i had to care for my mid80s mom. i am grateful to have sibs who live near her and are helping her. she lives alone and functions more like someone my age! bottom line… thank you for telling your truth. i’m not sure how to respond to my daughter’s resentments but having read this i have a better idea about myself and her. we are both normal. betty davis said, “growing old ain’t for sissies!” if you don’t mind, i would like to add one thought to your article. it is very real & helpful. everything you express resonates with me. but i see one area i feel is left out. to me one of the most important words in this situation is forgiveness. forgiving both your mother and yourself. forgiveness is not something you do for your mother (or whoever you find yourself resenting); it is for you yourself, to free yourself from holding on to anger & resentment. after all i at least find holding on to it really doesn’t accomplish anything anyway. it just builds higher walls. it is a choice. and by the way forgiveness is not a one time event. if whatever trigger causes the feelings to come back, you can choose forgiveness again..& again…& again…until that trigger loses its power over you & your reactions. i hope this might be helpful to you or to a reader. it certainly has been for me. i found this article upsetting. my parents both fought cancer during the same time. yes, it was the hardest thing i ever have gone through. it was heart breaking. at times i was exhausted, flustered etc. i felt like i couldn’t do enough for them. i wanted them to have the comforts of staying in their home etc. they had always been there for me, no matter what. this article lacks compassion and information. ex: elderly always complaining (salty food as you grow older you’d taste buds change, you get absent minded, you aren’t able to do the things you use to) take care of yourself before “resenting/being ugly to the people that loved you unconditionally. my mother has lived and been dependent on me since my dad passed 40 years ago. she speaks to me everyday like im a child, i am now 63. she is constantly dont do this, don’t do that, should have done this, should have done that. bosses around my husband and grown children, ruined 2 of my marriages, i feel like i have wasted my life on her. i hate her, but love her. have 4 brothers who do nothing for her. im so disgusted with myself, i really dont know what to do so true. my father seems to go on and on with demanding care needs and no help from siblings. i am getting close to the age my mother was when she died and feel i will never have my freedom. there is a good chance that he will outlive me. i have long stopped having any sort of holiday as my dad’s demands are constant. i have avoided his calls to live with him and have a 3 hour round trip drive each time. he never thanks me and complains about everything in his life. i love him but do not like him. this month alone, i have supervised a new bathroom build   to a disabled access room, done his gardening, spent a fortune on petrol back and forth, now he has ‘had an accident’ and dropped poo all over the living room and wants me to hire a carpet cleaner and clean all his carpets, then do his tax return from boxes of receipts…this will take a week (he refuses to use an accountant). he has a live in carer but that is only for daily washing and feeding. i am exhausted but then i feel guilty for wanting it all to be over … i’m very thankful to all of you sharing. my 99 year old mother has lived with me and my for the past two years. before that she lived alone in her 4 bedroom house that sat on an acre of land. she had lived alone there since my father died in 1995. she thankfully quit driving many years ago. my husband took care of her house and our house for all those years. it was exhausting. she is physically very healthy. she is losing her eyesight and hearing, so that upsets her greatly. having her here has been good since we only have one house to take care of. she has been very helpful to us financially in the past. i don’t feel as grateful for that as i should. she was very strict, severe and seemed to feel the world revolved around her when i was growing up. one of the worst things now is her constant crying. she’s always been a crier. she’s pretty much turned every holiday and occasion into an all day crying session. i finally got her on some ‘anxiety medicine’. it has helped some, but not enough. i am diagnosed with major depressive disorder that i inherited from her. i take her to all appointments doctoe, hair, etc. i don’t mind. i worked from home full time. i’ve had to use all vacation time to take care of her needs and wants. i feel like i don’t entertain her enough or provide for all that she would like. nothing is ever good enough. i love her, but i am exhausted and i know i would be considered a very bad person for that. my mother and i argued last night about her not being honest with me about her health. she is disabled and lives alone and manages quite well and has made it clear she will not accept care aides or go to a nursing home. i’m in the middle of an 11 year marriage and divorce, my nerves are frayed to say the least. i’m the oldest and my sister bailed 3 years ago and moved out of state far away. so it’s all on me. yet so many of my family members say, “you know, you don’t have to do this, you choose too!” oh, like that is supposed to help. funk me! she calls me back last night, i was napping to get my balance back, i hadn’t eaten all day from my nerves and my husband moving out some of his belongings. he was overwhelmed truly and now he wants to talk!? really!? the last 3 years, including covid have been hell and finally i named the elephant in the living room that we have been walking around! so she calls me and say, ” i don’t want to be a burden to you or anyone, ok i love you” i hung up the phone and went back to sleep. is she letting me go? if so, why can’t i let go? guilt, shame and other similar feeling flood my head and heart. gotta sit on this one for a while…. then this morning i sat in the bathroom with my tablet and thought, fuck it, i’m going to google “i don’t want to take care of my aging mother” and this page caught my eye. as i began to read, i said, “wow, wow, wow! and proceeded to cry while still sitting on the thrown. toilet paper conveniently nearby while my tears and snot out of the way. as i read more, i took a deep breath. see, i’ve always been aware that i have a unique mother situation. she was born with cerebral palsy, a difficult birth and the use of forceps to turn her around in a breech birth. she’s lucky to be alive. she’s smart, manipulative beyond imagination, independent and a fucking psychologist too! yes mother was able to work and socialize in high society despite the constant discrimination. that’s another long story and very real for the disabled. she caused much drama in our lives, 2 divorces. one from an alcoholic abuser and one from a man who sexually abused me. yeah, when she caught him in my bedroom she asked if i was ” trying to ruin her marriage!” i will never forget, never! i left home at age 16 and was emancipated by the courts. i never told the judge what happened, just that i was ready to go out on my own. my mother of course said i was a difficult teenager. you bet i was, i couldn’t find my voice! oh the issues continued as i reconnected with her later in life. many complications and outrageous experiences with a mother who also was mentally ill but denied it fervently. well, my sister and i have ptsd, anxiety and depression. so severe that neither of us are able to work and maintain friendships etc. it’s a total nightmare. yes, we have time on our hands so i tell myself i must take care of her as no one else will. move aside jesus i need the cross to crucify myself! i even feel guilty writing all this. it’s really too much for me to bare i can’t function. yes, i call her and visit her and try to be the “good daughter” because i must. at least i keep telling myself that. what will people think of me? it’s a love hate lationship for sure and her psychological abuse and manipulation are all over the narcissistic scale. i wasn’t ready for this in any way shape or form. i’m glad to see people are talking about this online. i have never chatted online or even dared to make such an inquiry as this. glad to know i’m not alone. aka jasminiqua jones i felt so ashamed when i (in pure desperation) started googling “why do i resent my mother?”. i quite honestly did not think other women experienced the same type of thing and i expected to find results confirming that i am indeed a horrible daughter. thank you for this article. although it won’t neccisarily “fix” anything it is good to know its “not just me”. this article upset me greatly! it was cold and callous! i am 68 years old and my husband is 76. to think that we may have children that may feel the way this person felt that wrote this essay is absolutely horrifying to think about! people don’t like to get old. they don’t enjoy losing their independence or having such horrific aches and pains that they can barely get out of bed in the morning. they didn’t bring on any of that to themselves. their demise will probably not be at the convenience of their obligated children who just find it a nuisance to deal with them. you know, karma is a bitch and these younger generation people will one day be wondering (in their old age) if anybody gives two shits about their fucking mother! good luck! what goes around comes around! i found this article when i googled “taking care of elderly parents who were unkind”. what a relief to read it and the comments. most people seem to have such warm, fuzzy feelings about their mothers   i do not. i have been so angry… my mom was cruel and critical of me when i was growing up, told me no one would ever marry me, that i’d never have friends, that i was a bad daughter and a bad person. she made it clear to me that, in her eyes, i had no value. when i was grown, i moved away and although i visited her regularly out of a sense of duty, i never moved back. i have a great job and a beautiful family now, 1000 miles from where i grew up. for the last five years, though, my mother has needed increasing help, and assumed i’d give up my life to move back and take care of her. my brother (who lives 20 minutes from her) of course is not expected to do anything. i’ve done everything i can: taken months off from work, away from my family, taken care of her after her falls, flown back and forth literally fifteen times in a year, all while she criticizes me and tells me that i’m never doing enough. it’s been very hard for me to find the compassion and patience to care for her when she was so mean to me when i was young and vulnerable. i’ve been dutiful, but my heart isn’t in it. i’ll be relieved when she is gone and this is over. so glad to have came across this article. my mom has been living with me for about five years. she has been depressed for years and has anxiety from hell and she barely leaves the house. but, she can totally fend for herself. her health besides the anxiety and depression is not too bad. she can still live a great life. she is 73. but she chooses just to slowly waste away and every day i get to see her wasting away and not doing a damn thing about it. i have tried everything possible to get her to get better. drs, counselors, family meetings. nothing makes this woman want to live life. i cannot take it anymore. watching her waste away is killing me. i am 48 and single and dating and i would love to meet someone and have a life with them but having to take care of my mom when she really can take care of herself is giving me anxiety that i have never have. and her negativity is beyond insane. cant talk to her more than five minutes before i am so angry i have to walk away. she doesnt have much money to get her own place so trying to get her into senior living. i have finally said screw this, i have got to do what i need to do for myself. my health is starting to deteriorate because of the stress of dealing with her. and i love her so damn much. we used to be the best of friends. and i miss the person she used to be. i want my mom back but she doesnt want to fight for her life back and it makes me angry cause that makes me feel she doesnt want to fight for a longer healthier life with me and her grandchildren and her son. they dont see the stress we have on the care giving end of it. i am glad i am not alone on this and i truly feel for all of you. this was beautifully written and timely found   my 79 year old mother is living with me now. she & my dad (parkinson’s) moved in with me a couple of years ago because no one wanted to cope with dad. he passed away last year d/t kidney failure, but without him to keep her focused, she’s been driving me nuts. my brothers have had her for visits   bless them!   but my sister moved to a different country several years ago so that she could live her own life. the thing that touched me about this article most closely is the articulation of that fear: my parents basically relied on me to fill their spots while they worked, so i didn’t get time when i was younger to have a social life or date. from the time i turned about 16 until i was in my 40s and 50s, dad used to advertise in church for anyone with sons, nephews, grandsons, etc…. so, now that i’m the maiden aunt, it’s on me to care for my mom, and i can see it as clearly as the reflection in my mirror that if/when my turn comes, i will be on my own because i won’t have anyone left. i love my mom, and i am so glad that she is here with me, but there are days when i wish that she had stayed closer to one or the other of my brothers. then they would know what it’s really like. i am not alone in this, so many thoughts and emotions were put into words by these courageous people. i wish i could be on the opposite end and say it is easy but it is not. i gave up my life now just when i became an empty nester with my husband. i am told to keep my emotions in tow but the outbursts of comments made sends me spiraling. my heart too is not in it anymore. i am saddened by this. taking care of an elder parent i thought would be different. i just cannot take it anymore. i cannot even cry if i wanted too (which i try.) as per above comment “maybe you have always been longing to be cared for fully by her, and now that she is on the tail end of life, it is inescapably clear that she will never care for you the way you wanted her to.” this is exactly true in my case. hoping it gets better. michelle: yes, realizing she can not care for you the way you always wanted is part of the healing process. hang in there. ditto for every emotion expressed here. my mother undermined and controlled me my entire life. i was also an only child and a daughter and after 20 years as a single parent of 4 , now handcuffed to my nearly 95 year old mother. my mother did a 180 at 93, suddenly telling me how wonderful i am and how much she loves me after abusing me to such a degree it set a blueprint for unhealthy relationships for life. she lives an hour away in her own home, a request written in the estate plan , and my life has been hell trying to fulfill her wishes. three round the clock caregivers drive me insane and are draining the trust set up for me and eventually my four children . there is no end to the maintenance of her home and estate. i have finally set some boundaries and plan to be away a good portion of this summer. she has dementia , is in diapers and at 65 i am running out of time to live my own life. no one should be burdened like this. we hear you. the generation of our parents didn’t expect to live this long and so there was no planning on their part or ours. what we can do is make sure we plan ahead for our children so they don’t have to be burdened like this with us. thank you for your insights. this article certanly resonated with me! my mom was an awful parent. she had 6 kids she neither had the sense nor the money to care for. she played favorites and i was her least favorite daughter. there were no hugs in my dysfunctional family. i left home in my early teens and made a good, stable life for myself. she is now 93 and has a caregiver which i did all the paperwork to get, including paying an attorney to get her qualified. i care for mother one day a week, manage her financial and medical bills and issues. she lies about expenditures and hides things from me which frustrates me because it couod impact her in home healthcare qualification. one of my sisters cares for her one day a week, too, but she’s constantly trying to squeeze money out of her. my mother thinks the sun shines out of her and gives her money without telling me then complains she can’t have new carpet, etc. she makes me give her receipts when i have to buy things for her but casually hands her atm card over to my sister, however, only wants me to manage her needs. she spends 4 hours a day praying and reading the bible but lies compulsively (she always has) and hides things from me like i’m her enemy. if it weren’t for me, she’d be in some old folks home instead of her own comfy home yet she treats me like i’m her nemesis, never calls unless she needs something and acts like she can’t stand me. i do not like her, i’m sorry, what is there to like?? signed   used and tired wow, i feel you wrote this article to scream what has been in my heart for years. you helped me to understand why i resent not only my mother but also my selfish siblings for leaving me all alone in this. as a child, i was her least favorite and now that she is helpless, i’m the one who has to stick around and provide care for her so my sibling can enjoy their freedom. i raised my daughter as a single mother and now i have to raise my parents, not to mention the old scare of childhood! thank you for your beautiful and educating article. just reading it brought so much peace to my exhausted soul. i was so angry and desperate for more than two weeks, that i tried google to find answers and am so glad i found this page. like several of the experiences here, i have, by sheer default, ended up as a caregiver for my mother. i am fifty five today and she moved in to my home when i was 41. i have not had any chance to live my life at all and have taken the entire brunt of my parents failed marriage. she moved in after she separated from my father. she and my father have always had a bitter and battle filled relationship and there has been physical abuse/ domestic violence from his side and emotional abuse from her side. they lived in a perpetual marriage of trying to control one another and finally separated around 14 years ago. their personalities are identical   both are manipulative, emotionally dishonest and have no accountability for their emotional abuse towards themselves or their kids. growing up there was a clear sign of favouritism towards the son, he grew up with entitlement which continues even today. and this has not changed in adult years too. at the time that she was seeking to move out, all the three siblings (we are three) agreed to equally act as the caregivers. however, with time, and the fact that i was the single daughter   while the other two siblings were married with their respective families, it became this sham   where i have been doing all the care giving and my siblings are happily living their own lives. nobody has made any sacrifices or compromises in their lives and conveniently this has literally been dumped on me. my mother is toxic   it took me years of pain and hurt to finally come to the conclusion that both my parents are toxic parents and in their separation i have ended up as the scapegoat to be emotionally abused. whatever i have done has not been enough for either of my parents   my father has a pension and doesn’t contribute a penny towards my mother. my sister is not working and we come from a culture that is highly patriarchal and so there is no effort on her part whatsoever to pull her weight in the care giving, even though she can. my brother conveniently lives abroad and makes tall claims of helping out but has never really done so. she took a brief respite and stayed with him for a while but now for the last 8 years has not left my home. it is not so much the care giving, but the demands and frustration she hurls at me. where i have forcefully established boundaries, she is not hesitant to keep on violating them; to the point where i lose my temper and end up screaming. initially i used to feel guilty but now i don’t because i am pushed to that corner by a highly manipulative and toxic parent. as i enforced boundaries i also saw the envy come to the forefront because i was no longer playing the game she was controlling. the worst is the undermining and belittling that is always happening   its like a psychological battle for control in every aspect. it took me years to realize that i was being emotionally, physically (care giving is a physical task too) and financially used, manipulated and controlled to serve her needs and ends and being the sensitive one among the three of us, i took the brunt silently, leading to deep conflict within myself. there have been cases of outright envy from each and every member of the family towards me and somehow those are merely shrugged away if i have spoken up about it. i have even been told i am over sensitive and reactive. everytime i say that i will drop her off to one of my siblings there is absolutely no pro active response from them   no one will say “hey do that, you need a break too”! it will be about why their homes may not be as comfy as mine is for her? the only reason why mine is comfy is that i am single! for my mother any mention of her leaving my home for a while leads to guilt tripping with claims that she is caring for me and cooking in my home. the only reasons she cooks is to keep herself active   more often than not she cooks what she likes and eats whatever she wants and then turns it around as if she is doing me a favour. all her financial expenses are mine. finally after 13 years i told her to use money from my brother’s account which they jointly share for her medical expenses when all her living expenses are mine still. that also created a huge battle initially but i stuck to my stand firmly and established that she will use her son’s money too. as of that is not bad enough she resents me having friends, a life of my own   and is highly insecure that i may actually find a partner and marry! i have given 14 years of my life and they have not given even a few months. i am so utterly fed up that i just can’t wait for this to be over! i must agree with the last comment, that was definitly a scream. i don’t know how to scream any more. i can’t stand to be with my mom any more. i am 35, and yes i never lived alone. yesterday i fould a kitten on the highway and i decided to bring it home and i needed her promission. i felt so small, smaller then the kitten in my arms. i had always been responsible one. i worked while i was on highschool which is not tipical where i live. but i didn’t work for my self. everything i worked for went inside the house. my mom never worked. sure she kept the house clean, but that hasn’t been happening for past 20 years. my dad pasted away more then 10 years ago. and only i see my mom is turning in to a monster that is trying to drag me not to go outside, not to have friends, lovers, pets, hobbies. nothing. at the moment i am watching her smoke 10 cigarette of the day in our super small apartmant that she doesn’t use asshtray, and trowing a paper in garbage that was missed my a lot. she use to cook, but for last 20 years, i am eating crap. most of the time she is pushing me to order burgers and then saying how i don’t save much. everytime my brother comes over we end up talking how we should move out, or i should where she say that she is fine but then she switches in to guit mode saying that she always thought i would take care of her. once my bother stood up to her about me being guit in and she laughed at him. saying that she raised me in to thing she wanted me to be and nothing can change that. i feel so empty and numb for the past 6/7 years. i went to a therapist couple of times. the first, she had a conversation with, like i am a baby or suffering from extream mental illnes. the second one, she went trough my papers and found a note of the doctor. she was crying and pissed at my that i shamed her infront of my doctor. i stoped going to therapy. latley i don’t know what to do. my mom is only focused on me working more and more, and less from home, but not participating in eating lunch with my coworkers or anything cause that is a waste of money and she wants to rebuild the house her mother left her. i just can’t. every shirt i buy is a rebelion i regret. so why should i even bother. i can’t wate for the day i will die. she can live 10/20 years more. and after that i would not have a life. i would be a skin with a dead body inside, the same thing i am today. so many posts resonate with me. my mum is 75, has terminal breast cancer and jumps from emotional days regulation outbursts to another. i didn’t realise until i’m now into my 40s how all my life i’ve had to be my mums keeper, carer, emotional punchbag. she puts on smiles for others and can swing into rages with both me and my son. the constant criticism of others, family, people on tv has been too much to bear. her cancer has only made it worse, she takes everything out on me, blaming me for her cancer, stating in the past that she hopes i suffer. i can’t even go anywhere with my son without jealous rages, so we never go on holiday, despite working so hard at work and looking after my son. both my son and i needed a rest from her and had a day at the seaside recently, whilst she was visited by her other grand daughter. we had 5 hours away from her and were unable to tell her as she goes into a full blown rage. however she fkund a parking ti jet in our car and manipulated my son into telling her we had bed away fir the day, then raged again saying i am sneaky and always havebeen. i’m the only person who has stayed around long enough to care for her but it’s so unbelievabley horrible. i hame no life, she wants me as an extention of her. my sister dies t get any of this and is just as horrible as my mum. i’m not perfect but i try. i’m bit sure how much more i can take, it’s getting me down the constant abuse and it’s only getting worse i’m 25 and my grandmother is 80. she’s taken care of me since i was 8 months. i know i’m blessed to have her, because my life would be totally different if i didn’t. i graduated high school, college, and live with her as i find my path (like i should be doing as a 20 year old). but lately as time has passed it’s just gotten harder. she’s always been dependent on other to do things for her, even when she was fully able to do them on her own. but after my grandfather died when i was 10, it got worse. she became really dependent, yelled at mw, cussed me out, became very critical, yet oblivious to who i was as an evolving person. just angry, so she always lashed out on me because she can’t treat anybody else that way. at 14, i was responsible for paying her bills online and doing chores because “she payed the cost to be the boss”. i remember i cut my hair one time and she called me ugly. throughout college i still had to pay bills on top of her controlling demeanor when i came home for summers. she’s kicked me out twice but allowed me to return. once for being “disrespectful”…she wanted to argue but i ignored her so she kicked me out. the second time because i didn’t get food from her friends house, she blatantly told me she couldn’t eat anyway. all because i said no. she had a fall 1 month and a half ago because she wouldn’t go to sleep when i suggested her to and fell to the floor while sleep at the dining room table. everyday she had me or one of my aunts come to the hospital, go to the grocery store, bring her food, toothpaste, gowns, blankets, serving her because she needs the attention and wants to feel loved (though she won’t say it out loud). now she’s back home and it’s even harder. she’s meaner, doesn’t ask me how i am or how my day was ever. complains all the time. we only talk when she asks me to do something or when she’s complaining. we don’t have a relationship at all. i don’t make a lot of money, but she never even asked me if i needed has or how i was getting back and fourth from the hospital. knowing i suffer from anxiety and depression she hasn’t even asked me if i’m okay. not once. she’s mad at me all the time for not providing her needs. cleaning her bedroom, cleaning the bathroom, washing her clothes, getting food, going to the grocery store two days back to back because she only thinks of food for that day. washing her hair, cleaning any spot she sits cause she’s extremely messy. all for her to tell me i’m not compassionate, mean, and i’m not doing enough. mind you i live in a household of 4 other adults. i’m struggling. i’m upset. i’m sad. i feel like i’ve been taking care of her my whole life. i’ve never gotten to live my life. it’s always been in servitude of her, from the very beginning. when do i get my freedom? i’m never going to get these years back. i feel imprisoned. and guilty for not wanting to be her everything. i haven’t had kids. i don’t even have a boyfriend. i’m too traumatized. as i write this i realize she just wanted someone to take care of her all along, but i’m just one person. with my own needs i neglect. and a life i haven’t gotten a chance to live yet. and my aunts and uncles are barely any help. starting tasks that i have to finish. they don’t live with her, they have it easy. i’m frustrated and tired of feeling unworthy and selfish when i know i’m deserving and doing my best. taking care of my mom makes me not want children. will they be this needy? will a husband treat me this way? idk. i’m tired. and alone. jesus! no one makes any of you take care of your mother. how would you like it if she would’ve said the same thing when you were a child. and daughters especially are difficult to raise. please don’t tell me that double standard about parents should put up with everything the kids do and then say gosh why should you have to help with your older parents. you will be there someday and you will be the same unless you’re lucky. my grandparents and grandparents before them lived in the non internet age with less social support. it was natural for grandparents in the past to live with their children/cousins, etc. and die in those homes. there was no social or financial support or home to stick people in during those times. but they learned to pull together and that is what the human race should do. they were better people for it my grandparents and great grandparents said. it was hard but the whole family and i mean cousins and everything would be in on it, because they knew they all would be there sunday and it was an obligation and a thank you for taking care of them. it seems to me like today’s generation has the internet to pitch on so much, that they feel they’re giving away a part of their life that they wouldn’t have if not for the very people they are griping about. i feel sorry for you guys if you are so unhappy because if i was your mom i wouldn’t want you around me. it would be better to take that much cruelty and insensitivity from someone you don’t know. if you feel guilty that is your problem. grow up. because in your mind you’re already abandoned your parent by saying they drive you nuts. and if i wasn’t a christian woman i would say i wish you could experience exactly how lonely they feel and how sad it is to have your body betray you, but i won’t. you will pay your karma however it happens. you’re being hypocritical by taking care of someone and feeling so horrible and talking to other people like you do. you have absolutely no idea of what it’s like for your parent to feel like they do when they can’t even understand themselves. educate yourself for god sake read an effing book on aging, alzheimer’s, post menopausal behavior, etc. or better yet be honest as a human being and just take a step back. no one is making you do this in caring for an aging parent(s). you want to be looked at as somebody who’s doing a good thing and all you’re telling me is that you’re an embarrassment yourself. i’m so disappointed in what i’ve read on this page that i can’t hardly stand it. what if your parents had treated you like this when you were a kid don’t tell me that kids don’t have problems that can go beyond the normal. it’s not two different things. gosh sorry i just have to quit because this is so depressing from you guys, not a word of thanks or love for these parents. just a of course i love them which is as good as saying you really don’t care. here’s my best advice if you can’t feel compassionate and learn how to balance your life, and yes it’s hard i know because i’ve done it, i’ve worked in elderly care and i love the elderly because they have a lot to share. life is hard duh, but we can’t deal with that and go on and enjoy the happy moments and pleasures that we can experience . the latest generations of americans are an embarrassment to the past americans of this country as far as their attitudes towards the elderly and disabled. to those who are understanding without patting themselves on the back kudos, but none of you fit that and i’m sorry for you. thank you for listening to my opinion, god bless you and your parents whoever you’re taking care of at this time. i’m so sorry, but ever since you became an adult, your resentment and misery is 100% your responsibility, even if there was trauma in your childhood. it is your responsibility to set boundaries with your mother. faced with homelessness, your mother would have been forced to either grow up and take care of herself or die if you had said no to her from the beginning. i will never, ever allow my mother to live with me, ruin my life, or impact my marriage like this. i will never take care of her at my expense. she will have to figure it out for herself if i am to enjoy my own life. for leona. looking after an elderly person in your home can be very challenging   even if you relationship with them has been good. it can go on for months if not years and if you also have a family to look after, a full time job, it can be completely exhausting. you say that you have worked in elderly care but when you work in elderly care you go home at the end of the day and you have a break from it, when you look after an elderly relative in your home you never have a break, from morning until the end of the day and even during the night you are at that person’s beck and call. their behaviour isn’t always reasonable, it can be downright difficult   a toddler except 5 times the size. and if you had a bad relationship, just because it is your parent doesn’t mean you necessarily have to love them unconditionally, not all parents are good parents, they can be cruel, narcissistic, negligent   you don’t have to be grateful for bad parents just because they are your parents. if you choose to take the responsibility for looking after them when they need you, you are a true hero, you need support not judgement so that you can carry on without breaking down. many people on here from what i’ve read are looking after their parents because they feel it’s their duty, they struggle on a daily basis, from exhaustion, depression, demoralisation. maybe they could find alternatives, maybe there aren’t any   certainly for me there aren’t. they struggle daily with guilt over how they feel   and feelings don’t make you a good or bad person, they make you human. if you feel angry, you feel angry and if you feel sad, you feel sad. what i see here is people who have bottled these feelings up for so long being able to express how they feel without being judged and to know that there are others who are also struggling. have some empathy, the saying that you “can’t understand somebody until you have walked a mile in their shoes”is very true. what i find depressing is not people finally being able to express their desperation with their situation but people judging those who they don’t know and whose situations and relationships they have never experienced. proves what i have come to believe 100%: women should stop having children. “leona” is a goddess. the rest   schmucks. “leona” states: :i feel sorry for you guys if you are so unhappy because if i was your mom i wouldn’t want you around me. it would be better to take that much cruelty and insensitivity from someone you don’t know. if you feel guilty that is your problem. grow up. because in your mind you’re already abandoned your parent by saying they drive you nuts.” i agree. i don’t want my offspring around me, knowing how “hard” it is. i’d rather die on the floor eaten by termites. i knew a woman very well whose mother had placed herself in a long term care facility well before she needed it. she paid every outrageous cent for it. her very successful daughter complained about “having” to see her   a 20 minute car ride, too   even a couple times a month, and this same woman writes about how wonderful her mother was, on the internet and elsewhere. her mother could not have made it easier for her. so   “anonymous”   you getting any life insurance when your mother dies? there may still be time to get a policy   you know, to make your trials and tribulations all worthwhile. just do her a favor if she is still alive   leave her alone. my parents made sure i had no love interest so that i could stay this family’s golden cage doing all i have to do so that they can live while i am dying . people who say they are religious, or act like they are a family while suffocating me with their issues . dont people say that ” we should take care of ourselves first before caring for others”, isnt there a saying “all lives matter” ..they know exactly what they have done by not asking others to help, by not helping themselves when they could, they knew what they were doing to pick me as the family free labourer , caregiver ( they hate the latter word) i want to die first so that my family sees how it was all dumped on me. it is not about the money to me, it is about a life. i watch my parents pay strangers to do what i do for them for free. i dont hate them for that, it is up to god to make others pay their dues. i have more than paid my dues. my siblings want to act like i do nothing, same as my parents, for they will fear that they will have to pay me the way they pay others. 3 hours dont go by where i dont have to do something for them . to ensure that i am not taken for granted, i take pictures &record . i dont want money, for money will never give me my decades back, money will never “thank you for helping us”.. if i was offered money and took it, my siblings or parents would say “see you want money” .. there is different levels of caregivers, those that have a life, those that have sacrificed it all . i could never have someone help me to the point that they have no more dreams left. i mostly help my mother, but that is the same thing as helping my father and siblings. because i have to do work that my siblings or father will not do for my mother . why is one life more important than another. there is elder abuse..but there is also elders who abuse . these type of elders dont want to go to a home , they dont want to spend their own money, they also know what will happen in a home, because they can not abuse a nurse the way elders are allowed to abuse their own blood i would really like to know what percentage of family caregivers are the daughters and how many are the sons . my parents never took care of their parents, heck they dont take care of each other and have used me my whole life…they like they love me to lure me to the home base, then they basically do whatever they have to do to use me . what i wanted for my life, i can’t have anymore, all i want is to die. let me fall on the sword so that it is known that i have been driven to the end of the cliff. people watch but do not care, they sit with wives and kids, while i was manipulated into this position. then there is the black sheep syndrome . if you have been treated poorly , or unloved, unwanted, it mentally puts you in a position of wanting to “keep trying to get the love from that parent”. so some of us stay and help because we think “i can be loved if i do this and that”, but it just leads to more pain. the more you are around doing things the more you will be used. my parents dont want to bother the other siblings , they dont want to look like a burden, so they use one and then gaslight me to make it look like im crazy, when i am basically doing 20 different jobs a day i have zero life..this writer has 10 friends, i have had to get rid of all of my friends because i didn’t want people to see what was going on, i have friends who told me that i am being abused, that i have no respect for my own life me and my siblings, there is no compassion, there is no splitting of services i weigh 30 lbs less than all my siblings, men and i do the heavy work when we argue because i am physically pushed beyond a human level. my father all the sudden cares for his wife when he didn’t care for her for 60+ years. he never cared to care for her until now when he sees that she might go first and he wants to disperse money in the end based on who he likes, not who helped i have been hit by my siblings, my father, and my mother creates so much chaos if i dont do what she wants and how, she basically orders a “hit on me” the one that is around do all the work, or most of the work is the one that gets the hate . my parents never think “what my daughter is doing for us, no one will do for her” i never got a chance to have my own life. everytime i had a potential life partner my parents would start to see that i would get pulled away from being their servant and they would have to find someone else to help them. i just dont see a life for myself anymore, congratulations, i was born , i lived so that i could take care of 2 people. even though i care for 1 parent, the other parent profits by never caring for his wife and he has all his time as a bachelor. i ended up becoming my mothers husband, doing all the things he vowed to do for her only reason im writing this, is because one day someone in my family will find this , i will leave my legacy written or told, that i was born to sacrifice my life to care for others i dont hate my parents, if i did i would of abandoned them, i hate the fact that all these people in the family and they sit back and watch that i had a life until my 30’s , i hate the way they think it is ok to dump all on me. they come and eat, they come to be entertained and pretend that this is a family, but im basically cinderella on my hands and knees talking to the mice in their house, while the siblings go out dancing and laughing at me i do not hate the people, i hate being used what am i supposed to do, just go along my merry way and get calls cus she got hit, or get a call cus they are in the hospital cus they burnt down a house or fell down and broke bones or a neck i hate how people act like they are a god fearing, united family while they watch one person sacrifice , suffer and want to die isnt there a saying “all lives matter” ….why doesn’t my life matter echoing mariandavis and julie who were upset by the callousness expressed in a self indulgent rant by a daughter who is “good” in her own mind an anonymous coward, free to embellish her mother’s failings, reducing her to a cartoon. too bad you can’t just euthanize the old bag like you can a pet, yeah, anon? i’ve been on both sides of the mom problem: daughter to an alcoholic mom who was diagnosed at 35 with a rare genetic disorder that greatly contributed to destroying her physical and emotional health, and as a mom (widowed) on the receiving end of my only child’s indifference and cruelty. not a day goes by that i don’t think of my mom, and wish i’d understood what it’s like to inhabit a diseased body, struggling to get out of bed each day, in constant pain 24/7. alone. i sure understand now because my body is failing, and i’m all alone. i would give anything if i could tell my mom, “i’m sorry my hedonist brother abandoned you; i’m sorry i wasn’t around more for you; for not understanding the hell you endured. i’m sorry for my impatience and frustration that i did little to hide. i’m sorry for making you feel you were a burden. i’m sorry for becoming frustrated when you could no longer go to restaurants because the food would pass right through you. more than anything else, i’m sorry for accusing you of lying about being too ill to come to the mother’s day brunch i’d planned for you three months before you died. throughout your life, you often used ill health excuses to bow out of social events. you weren’t lying that time. a disc had disintegrated in your back. you never walked again. i imagine you despised me very much at that point. and rightly so. you could still speak, but had no words for me.” my daughter told me last night i was a burden; a pain in the ass. yes, julie, karma is a thing. to all of you applauding miss anon here: you’ll get old sooner than you ever thought possible. good luck with your kids especially those on ssris long term. my daughter’s been on that empathy killer for 20 years. our relationship is a gas. bless you for writing this desperately needed article. 😇🙏 and thankyou to all the brave & honest caregivers who responded with their own stories.🤗☺ i’ve gained some invaluable insights from the reader’s comments as well as from the main article & its just what i need at this point in time   currently at a critical stage with my 82yr old abusive, mentally ill, hoarder aunty   i’m the only person left in the family who will speak to her, noone else will have anything to do with her so i’m burdened with it all. i signed her up with a local senior citizens & she has a whole team of people helping her…but she won’t help herself 🤯😵 multiple house cleaners have quit because of her ongoing hoarding & filthy living habits. even professional “squalor cleaners” stopped returning our calls after a few jobs   its too much for even professionals to handle. 🤮🤢 i understand hoarding is a complex mental health condition but i can’t help feeling seething resentful at how she undermines everybody’s hard work. 🤬😤 i give so much of my time & energy & free labour but it all feel like a fruitless waste of time. 😭 having read everybody’s comments, i feel my situation would only worsen if i were to go ahead with previous plans to move in with her   i’d only end up being more angry & resentful than ever & that’d be bad for us both. 🥵 i feel she steals enough of my time & energy already, i don’t think i could cope with any more than the 2 3days per week she takes from me already. i’ve got a family of my own + my own parents are both aged & ill & they could use my help rather than this ungrateful aunty who is not even a blood relative, just aunt by marriage. thank you so much, i felt so alone and disgusted with myself for the terrible feels of anger and resentment i have towards my 94 year old mother who has been living with us for the past 5 years. as a child my mother was never home, she did not work, but was going to school and hanging out with her friends (she was in her 40’s)not sure what she did with her time. i would come home to an empty house, i was molested by family member for years and she had no idea. i’m tired, my husband and i have raised our children and were looking forward to it just being the two of us, but i think she will outlive use both…….. thank you so much for this article! i felt so identified with all that i could have written this myself (but in spanish which is my mother language). the most difficult part of all this is the mixed feelings of anger, sadness, and guilt. i used to admire my mother so much and now we have so few things in common. it’s an effort for me to be with her and it’s very difficult for me to even hug her. of course, feelings of shame flooded into me. it’s so good to see that i’m not alone (even as i am in the other part of the world, argentina), that these feelings are so human. hi gabriela: this is exactly why we wrote this piece. we all feel ashamed and yet these feelings are natural. this is not an easy thing to do. you are a wonderful daughter for even trying. i wish i had my mother back to take care of. i never expected her to be anything other than who she was, even after the strokes that left her more distant and meaner. i’m no saint, and my childhood was far from perfect, but i loved her for all of her imperfectness. i pray i never made her feel like a burden, because even though life can be a burden, she never was. i feel honored to have been a part of guiding her through her old age and eventual death as lovingly as i could, doing what i could to bring a little happiness and comfort into her life. getting old is terrifying. not being able to take care of yourself anymore is terrifying. relying on others for survival is terrifying. the loneliness of old age is dark and smothering, and having death looming over your shoulder, knowing your life is coming to an end, that you won’t “be” anymore, be anything ever again, what a horrifying thing to have to live with. although i understand the feelings expressed in the article and the comments, i can’t help but wish i could take all of these precious mommas and care for them myself. i know one day when she finally dies, i will feel remorse for saying i really really dislike my domineering, bossy, cold fish, unloving, unappreciative hag of a mother. i may even feel guilty at her funeral that i ever even thought these things. probably cry even, and all that. but i also know i will breathe a huge sigh of relief. the hugest sigh imaginable. because i’ll finally be free of her. i laughed at the comments adminishing those people likecme who can’t stand their mothers, hate caring for them, etc., saying “one day you’ll get old and no one will care for you!” wrong. i have made provisions for my old age. i have planned financially for it. i will never ever need to depend on my children for anything. my horrid mother never had a thought for anyone but herselg, made stupid choices with her money and her husband , my abusive alcoholic dad. spare me the weeping violins and admonitions. i don’t owe her a thing. having just returned home (over 500 miles round trip) from dealing with the practicalities of my mother’s life, i took to my bed for 24 hours. she is a 90 year old with dementia who only wants/ has, me. i have a brother, bless, who is ‘loving’ but never ever visits. he lives 20 miles away and has a family of females taking care of his needs. i have raised 2 sons (5 grandchildren) singly, on a poor income, but have managed well through skill, personal strength and practice. being 70 now, all my strengths are weakened and have recently, upon a friends advice, have realised a life of tumbling through has been driven by lack of executive function. so my question is   is the reason why some of us struggle with the role of caring for a demanding, controlling and angry mother is not only because we are stuck with a continuing role but more difficult because of the way we are hardwired   nothing we can hope to change. hi annie: i think we can always change. no matter what age you are. you are doing an incredibly hard job. a job no one prepared us for. i do believe some of us are hardwired to care more than others. you might find some help by checking in with a local caregiving group or socialworker. you could get some ideas on how to handle this so you can feel better yourself. thanks for leaving a comment. i cant say how comforting it has been to read these comments and the blog. i just cant say right now…. awesome. this is a hard road. we understand. take care i can’t stand my mother. after the death of my father 2 years ago this bat crazy shit stain doesn’t remember anything from after she married my father. she blocked out the death of my brother and now blocked out the death of my father and it seems my entire existence. due to life i recently moved in with her. she doesn’t have dementia or alzheimer’s. she lives in her repressed memory bubble in her own world. so fucking annoying but i’ve decided if she’s not gonna remember me i’m changing my name in her presence and i’ll pretend i’m not related. it’s working out great for me. hi lorna. i’m sorry to hear all this. but changing your name is great idea. these are difficult times. good thing mom didn’t feel that way about raising you, and gave you away. this is what you are doing to your mom in your head. wishing she was gone forever. to much trouble. parents mean nothing to their children any more. a bunch of spoiled brats, that think they should have everything you have got, and now. so die so they can get it. parents are your burden unless you already moved out of town, so you aren’t bothered by them. may god forgive you. selfish children. my mother turned 82. she got old. she was fine and active until a year ago and then my father died. she pretended she had it all together and then once he was gone her emotional needs could never be met. she was privileged and was kept the entire 60 years they were together. now she can’t even function without him. she shovels shit into her mouth on a daily basis using food as a form of comfort…meanwhile her cognitive decline speeds up, she becomes more unhealthy, angry, bitter, and neurotic. she wonders why everyone has stopped calling her and visiting her. my siblings and i are doing everything we can to satiate her emotional needs but i’ve begrudgingly come to the conclusion that its a bottomless pit. i came across this site in an effort to learn how to best serve her as well as learn to detach from her toxic negativity. i never thought much about women’s empowerment before but now i get it. it’s horrifically sad to be submissive to a man and then once he’s gone you don’t even know who you are. then you’re angry and pissed off about your emptiness but you got too old and its too late. i love my mom alot but wow, its pathetically sad to watch what she’s become and rapidly turning into. hi rick: yes. one of the issues with women being constantly dependent on another human being and not being totally formed or independent on their own is what happens when that support disappears. this is why we at coveyclub want all women to take their financial and emotional support in hand and own it in their 40s,50s,60s and beyond so this doesn’t happen. your kids should not have to fill the gap for this old fashioned dependency type of relationship. the patriarchy was great for the men but left many women infantalized. thanks for acknowledging your new point of view. i have a bad deal or worse, my stepmom moved in with me because her sight is getting bad, and my siblings disowned her when my dad passed 23 years ago. well, she says she can’t get her meds, she can’t get her stuff to drink, she can’t put her plates in the sink, she sits in the living room with only a depend on, she’ll go to the bathroom on the floor, but she’ll go to a bar and play slot machines for 10 hours or more. i told her after she was in here over 10 hours and straight lied to me i was never bringing her again. she’s trying to play guilt trip on me but i’m too mad for it to work. she is and always has been very selfish and self centered. what do i do? hi franziska: we would suggest you find a group near by or online where you can discuss this problem. sounds like your stepmother is not respecting all you do for her. you should seek professional guidance on how to handle this situation. we’re sorry this is so difficult. i’m wore out, i lost my husband of 19 years 3 years ago, my step mom moved in with me, every time i talk about him she tell me to stop thinking about him and get on with my life, she tells me she forgot about my dad after he passed, i flat out told her there was a big difference between her and me, i have a big caring heart where hers is cold and selfish. that may be mean but totally true. my health isnt good. i’m losing my hair from stress, i get about 2 hours sleep a night because she’ll wake me up about midnight to feed her for the 10 time, and when i get woke up i can’t go back to sleep. i just don’t know what to do. any large hearted people out there have any ideas. thanks for listening fran you think your 92 year old mother has the capacity to control her behavior all the time? you think this won’t happen to you? karma, baby. what a strain on love. you know, if you said you needed more support, i’d have understood. it’s too much for one person. but, the fact you loved your mother when you were young but now, let’s face it, hate her at 92? i don’t care if she is demanding. you are an adult and just do what you can. i can’t image what it feels like to raise a daughter, think you have love between each other, grow old then elderly, and have that daughter you loved, and who once said she loved you, hate her. you’re going to allow her die thinking you hate her, and it is probably very confusing for her. you see you in the future when you look at her. it’s so sad to die knowing the love you thought you once had from your own child is gone because the child cannot grow up. thank you for this article and all of your comments. all of you have saved me this morning as i am typing this in tears, recognizing that i am not a terrible person for the recognition that i need to set boundaries. i am in the early stages of taking care of my mother, whose husband of 35 years passed 6 months ago. she is suffering from vertigo (can’t find the cause) and has deep depression, anxiety, and panic attacks since i was a young girl. i have spent the past week immersed in this and it is breaking me. i’ve had to clean her up and dress her. she cries and panics constantly. her fears consume her, especially if she is ill. three years ago i thought i was finally embarking on a time in my life when i could focus on me  taking hikes, hobbies, etc  as i am still working full time in a very demanding job. covid hit and my husband got very ill. i assumed the caretaker role. my college aged children were having a tough time and i was focused on their well being. then, my almost senior in hs suffered a bout of depression and we have now arrived at a really good place. then this hit. i just don’t know if i can do it. reading all of your comments helps immensely. i have spent my whole like wishing my mother would have been strong enough to take care of me. she is not. she is not the anchor of the family. i am. and i resent it. i resent having to take on that role because my mother was weak. that is the word i’ve been searching for. it is such a simple concept that i really didn’t think about until i read it today. i resent caring for her because she never cared for me the way i needed to be cared for and loved. she did the best she could but i’ve have never been able to say to anyone  it wasn’t enough! spot on with what i am feeling as i struggle with going over to see her today or taking a walk. i think i need to take the walk, but the guilt and worry consumes me. glad this very honest assessment of what we go through was helpful. a walk will definitely help. this was so helpful, thank you! my mom is only 78 but has not lived alone in 8 years. thankfully, she is able to afford to live in an independent living community which is a lifesaver, but she still pretty much controls my life. i’m good at boundaries but when she falls and has to go to the er or spend weeks in rehab, then all balance is destroyed. my mom had a career that moved her away to a different city and she came home on the weekends. obviously, that wasn’t going to end well so my parents divorced and she spent the next 20 years pretty much focused on herself. i didn’t want to be anything like her so i got my education and career but walked away from it when we had kids. i poured my life into my children for 15 years before going back to work part time. now i am 58 with grandchildren (#5 on the way) and a horse hobby, in addition to a part time job that i love….. but my mom’s needs still dictate my life. she has memory issues and can’t keep up with her health appointments, medication, finances, etc. i have resented her so much for being so incredibly needy (getting calls about everything from “i’m constipated and you need to do something about it” to “i have diarrhea and you need to do something about it”, to “i’ve fallen and i can’t get up”). i have ptsd every time she calls at an unusual time. my mom did not help when her mother was going through this stage because she was too busy chasing her career on the other side of the state while her younger sister did all the heavy lifting with my grandmother. now, it all just makes me sick. i’ve made progress with my attitude because i choose not to live a miserable life, but sometimes the grief, anger, resentment, sadness, etc. come along suddenly and it’s so hard. your article made me laugh and it reminded me that i’m not alone. thank you for the encouragement and validation. i too have been the child who had been groomed to take care of my mom. she was always self absorbed when i was a child. as an example, she actually asked me to stop talking on occasion while she was scanning the restaurant for a man who might be noticing her. she was always a beauty. she said my sister was the beauty and i was “beautiful on the inside” with a chuckle. i could go on and on with examples. interesting that as she is aging she has been very complimentary about my looks. either feeling guilty or just getting close because of the position she has groomed me for. always said she “prayed for me” before she got pregnant and i was her gift from god. i see now it’s because she actually believes i was born to take care of her. so now i’m almost 70 and she is almost 100. my sibs see her rarely and mom depends on me exclusively. why am i feeling guilty for not wanting this to continue. i get angry at her and myself, and tell her rarely that the family needs to talk about getting someone to take her to appointments and shopping etc. which is met with silence from all…and punishment from mom (she refuses to answer my calls or texts etc.) as a martyr mother maneuver (grew up with that). so…finding this site and reading every post was just the thing i needed. i do realize that aging isn’t fun but guess what…we all are going there which makes each day a gift to make the most of. being kind and compassionate doesn’t obligate you to a life of feeling manipulated by anyone…even your parent. i have a lot to be thankful for…and yes having her living so long has given us an opportunity to know each other as adults. it’s my option how much time and energy i spend with mom and resentment and guilt are my issues, not hers. so today i will remember the good things i do for mom and not dwell on how i disappoint her for not doing more. pursuing my goals and love life and only doing things for mom that are out of love and not guilt. tougher than it sounds apparently! thanks for your honest thoughts both pro and con about this emotional issue…it helped me a lot! carpe diem going through this awfulness with my husband’s parents. neither of them were caregivers to their parents; they both had siblings who took on those responsibilities. they never had a clue what it is to make a burden of oneself on their children. instead, they made no effort to care for themselves, becoming increasingly helpless. they lived like children, squandering their money on any junk they felt like buying, having no savings or investments on which to retire. they eat nothing but junk food, they do nothing but sit in front of the tv, every home they lived in for the last 20 years became increasingly filthy as they gave up on even the most basic efforts to pick up after themselves. they also smell bad, having abandoned normal hygiene. they’re not senile, though they’ve let their minds grow dull and unlively. they expected my husband and me to take care of them. while we were willing to shuffle them to various appointments (and oh how they just love to see doctors as often as they can!), do their grocery shopping, and do things like change lightbulbs, install grab bars, and the more usual things adult children do for their aging parents, neither of us was willing to clean up after them, or act like their servants. finally too physically infirm to live independently, it was time to pack them off to a nursing home. while they indicated we should’ve been willing to modify our home to allow them to move in, we were not going to allow dirty, smelly, lazy, ungrateful, combative, irresponsible parents to make ruin of our home and our lives. the nursing home options available to them are bleak; we found the best possible option we could. it’s not how my husband or i would want to end up in our old age, but then, that’s why we take care of ourselves fiscally, physically, nutritionally, intellectually, and socially. we are planning for as healthy and wealthy and active an old age as we can. we want to be blessings to our children and future grandchildren, and to be remembered with love and affection, not revulsion and resentment. i consider our fiduciary responsibilities to help them to be fully discharged. we did what we could to help two people who refused to help themselves. after reading the article and the comments, it is a relief to know that i am not alone with feeling frustrated, sad, depleted, tired, and guilty. my mom moved in with us over three years ago and some days i wish she hadn’t. i feel like i am the “good daughter” while my sibling does nothing to help in any way. as she ages, i find it difficult to hear the same stories and complaints over and over. as her memory fades, it makes me sad. i struggle with taking care of her and feeling like my life is on hold and then feeling guilty for wanting to be free when she passes. it’s a difficult journey and it is not a burden i want my children to carry when it’s my turn. so often, money dictates the care that one gets, a sobering reality. hi jackie: we hear you loud and clear. no one wants to feel this way. our parents didn’t want this either. no one had a plan. we need to plan for our kids. exactly the point. man i feel you on resentment and anger. my mom is quite capable of doing almost anything she wants to do. ie: she cant get herself a drink, but the other night despite it causing extreme pain in her shoulders, she toddled to the kitchen with her walker and fixed herself cheesecake. it’s a constant battle to get her to move for herself. she is early stages of dementia so short term memory is shot. which is not an issue. but she’s very impulse driven and always has been. so despite being asked not to do, eat, take something if she wants it, she’s doing, eating or taking it. end of story. i’ve been caring for her and my dad, until her died last year, for four years. i have a sister but she doesn’t split any financial support and she helps occasionally but gets to use the excuse of kids to be “busy” a lot. i’m beyond burned out. like to the point i feel like an empty husk of a person. i’ve got nothing left for anyone not even myself. the house is constantly a mess. i have more urine soaked laundry and trash and chores than i can count. and all i ever hear from my sister is “every adult has chores” but it’s more than that. my mom is oxygen dependent too. she also habitually just puts her oxygen on her chin, head, around her neck. she also, despite my reminding her for four years about it, never watches her oxygen cord. so i spend every waking hour checking constantly if she’s wearing her oxygen, monitor her when she’s walking, changing her bed, cleaning up whatever she’s dropped, smeared, or dripped from her body, hands, walker tray. and there is no end. it feels like she’s sucking the life from me and somehow improving her health somewhat but still has no interest in doing for herself. it’s all just so exhausting. and there is no escape. pretty sure she’s gonna kill me way before she ever dies. anyhow bottom line is i feel ya lol. caregiving is not for the faint of heart, my grama used to say that about getting old. both pretty much suck! 😂 as a son, i hate seeing my parents age, become fragile and lose independence. it hurts to see this happening in these ones i so very much love. how do i overcome pride issues of seeing my elderly mother naked to bathe her.. i mean i know she feels shame and while i love her dearly i don’t want to see her naked. its just something i have to get past. im just venting. wonderful to have you vent. yes, that could be uncomfortable. you might want to check in with a local social worker and ask how to handle the bathing issue. lovely that you are there for your mother. the title of this article is all wrong. it should be ” rotten daughters” who are very disrespectful to good mothers” may life and your ending be the same. my biggest worry is that my own adult children will feel this way towards me when i am 80 not 60! i love them dearly. but i wasn’t a perfect mother. i think i tried to be friends with my daughter. as my husband was emotionally unavailable to me. i’ve done my best to become her cheerleader instead of a burden as i’ve slowly understood the damaging dynamics in our relationship. will my natural decline as i age infuriate her like my mother ignites my anger. my question after reading this is, is there another way? does it have to be like this? we think talking about these issues early on with your children is a good start. talk about your fears and that you know you were not perfect. make sure you have some arrangements so you are somewhat able to care for yourself if you can. but it starts with talking now. my mom is 87. i lived with her all my life im now 60. me and her i thought had always been close. always thought friends till she got old past two years and she just basically sat in a chair and never wanted to do another thing. ever. she admited to me she bought me things so i would take care of her when she got old. like a payment. i never knew that things i thought she did cause she wanted to was just for a payment later on in taking care of her. i cook for her i clean i wash her cloths. i shake my head as she refuses to eat half the food i cook or when she does eat it has theatrics about how it made her sick, how it makes her throw up or had she just wont eat it. she likes to ask for the hardest foods to cook like fried chicken, turkey dinners and fried fish all i found out she hated but would ask me to cook it for her cause she knew it was hard to cook and time consuming. the joke was on her though cause i wouldnt cook nuffin else and she either ate that or at nuffin. i now promptly freeze stuff like that and when she starts with the i want some fish or something i just microwave it and give it to her and then go eat something i want. my doc told me when she does that she just dont have to eat. other thing is she talkes. she litereally will talk 24 hours of the day. she will sing, complain, talk, complain about me, complain about her imaginary kids, cats, dogs, and whatever else she thinks of. she insists me and my brother are married and that she has more kids then she does. she calls her imaginary daughter my name and then told me to change my name. i know might sound funny but its very hurtful to me. and thats the other thing she dont care she hurts me, and she delibertly tries to make me cry. she has said she knows she does this on purpose she dont know why an then no apology nuffin. she pretends she cant hear me so i have to speak up when i speak up she says im yelling at her i try to explain to her im not yelling at her but she cant seem to hear me and she says what you saying so i talk louder and she starts critizing me, whats wrong with you why you doing that im not deaf you know. so after a few episodes of that i try to avoid her which is sad cause its the last thing i want to do but she makes it impossible. she throws me out about once every few months tells me to leave get out and i remind her if i did she would end up in a nursing home for sure. that makes her doubly mad at me and then she tells me ill end up in one and i said i probably will someday as i have no other family that would really want to help me in anyway. people die of covid but i feel like im dying of my mother. she makes me feel horrible guilty and she has told me if she dies its going to be my fault. i have tried to laugh about it and sometimes that works but when she goes for the personal hurt the personal attack the personal put down just cause she thinks she has the right to……sometimes i think maybe i will just walk out that door and never look back. i love her but when is love not enough and its hard to live with her knowing she actually really hates me. i do have two brothers on says im married and me and my wife cant be involved so good luck to you and the other one just works all the time says he has to to pay the bills in the house. so its just me and mom and we probably both very unhappy and probably will be till she dies. in pain: we hear you. you are not alone. we are sorry for your situation. you have no idea how much this article made me feel not so alone. thank you!!!! exactly the point. thanks julia for reading. thank you so kuchen for taking the time to write this. i felt like this was almost written for me personally. it has been so helpful to understand the reason for my resentment and anger. as you suggested i am going to try to allow my vulnerabilities surface rather than the anger and i am setting boundaries for myself. i have realised that my mother manipulates me at times. i am lucky that my own home with husband and children is like my sanctuary to where i can escape and switch off. wishing everyone well with their own personal challenges. i’m sorry to say but your story angered me, this is your creator you’re slagging off here, the only person on this planet that has loved you unconditionally from the moment your eyes opened until the moment she passes, and when that moment comes you will regret posting this, all carers know precisely what you’re going through, and most i would say even more so. you are struggling to cope we get it, we all are, but we know why we do what we do and we know that it’s the right thing to do, yes, it sucks, it’s mental torture at times, but it’s not her fault. you do whatever you have to do to get your own life in order so that you are able to cope better with the situation you are in, but you never, under any circumstances whatsoever bad mouth your mother again, that line you should never cross! learn to cope, and if you are unable to handle it, do what’s right for her, not you or anybody else. learn to breathe when she triggers you, learn ways to change her mindset, things that make her happier, music, good memories, etc, let her know everything is fine, great even, make her happy! you still work so i consider you a part time carer at best, if your job is too much to handle alongside caring, speak to your boss, maybe its time to go part time and try to learn to enjoy your mother whilst she is still here, yes, you probably have bills to pay or have a million other excuses like my sister had not to help, you can get help to get through this period if you look hard enough, it’s miserable being a carer and other carers will always support you, just stop cussing your mother out that’s your first step to becoming a better person! when you next see her tell her how amazing she is and tell her why! i’m sorry but you deserved this. i totally hear your point, as i am facing the exact situation you describe in the article. a mother who never worked has no idea what is like to be busy in life. i am helping care for my mother but thank god i travel a lot. otherwise i could not do it. my mother is bossy, needy, demanding and self absorbed. i am the happiest when i travel away from her. mothers and fathers are not perfect. they are human beings like any other. so do not make them out to be gods that we should be joyful to care for. i had no children of my own and if i did i would not subject them to the amount of needy manipulation some elderly parents subject their children too. we have a life to life and they already lived theirs. my mother for example depends on everyone that surrounds her so she can have the same life she had 20 years ago. no maids make it past 6 months working for her because she is needy as heck. who the hell enjoys filling requests every single minute of the day for someone who acts helpless unless her personal interest is stake. come on. let’s be real. being a parent does not make you a perfect human being. just because you put “good” in the title doesn’t mean you are. seems like you’re trying to convince yourself. reassuring self assessment maybe. loser. wow. yet another opportunity to bash a whole generation of baby boomers! kudos! way to go! at least serial killers put their victims out of their misery. parents torture you from day one, then kill you in the end! it’s time to take euthanasia seriously! we are an overpopulated, invasive species, we are all miserable, treat each other like crap & if we don’t want to be here, that should be our choice! it’s my body! & most parents have been emotionally or physically abusive. boomers are awful! older generation even worse! we put pets out their misery & it’s time to stop putting the worst species on earth, on a pedestal! we spend to have procedures to stay alive longer, drugs to prolong life & all it does is create zombies! religion is an evil cult, every single one, it exists to make excuses for this stupid race and it’s time to eliminate it! legalize euthanasia & stop with the doctors! thank you for your honesty. it is so refreshing. don’t listen to the negative comments. you are allowed to feel how you feel. and you are still a good person even though you feel that way. thank you for being brave enough to do so. i will admit i’m a bad daughter. but i know that i am giving back what i have been given. i know that if my mother were a better person i would also be a better daughter. and i also know that i am a good person, and because i see what my mother has been, i am a good mother. i have learned to not be what she is. i will never be what she is and maybe that is the best gift she has given me. i see and know mothers that i wish i could’ve had. we all don’t get to have those. for those of you that are skeptical, i’ll just say my mother tried to kill herself several times when my sister and i were young. she blamed us for everything. we would be the butt of her jokes. she never took us to get our nails done or taught us to do our makeup. she would just tell us how she didn’t want to be a mother and tell us we didn’t want her to be happy. now that lady lives with me. and she does nothing. doesn’t even try to have a relationship with her own grandchildren who are funny, smart, cute and the best humans i’ve ever met. thank god for my wonderful kids. it’s been 7 years since she moved in and half the time i’m scared she’s going to kill us in our sleep. at least now she isn’t strong enough to. but when i’m rushing to take my kids to school in the morning and she is yelling at me to get her water i have such anger and resentment i am overwhelmed. i can’t. obviously a lot of people feel as we do, with all of the comments here so please keep it up and i hope you find peace, as i am struggling to find it with my mother as well. thank you for your honesty. it is so refreshing. don’t listen to the negative comments. you are allowed to feel how you feel. and you are still a good person even though you feel that way. thank you for being brave enough to do so. you are helping others. i will admit i’m a bad daughter. but i know that i am giving back what i have been given. i know that if my mother were a better person i would also be a better daughter. and i also know that i am still a good person, and because i see what my mother has been, i am a good mother. i have learned to not be what she is. i will never be what she is and maybe that is the best gift she has given me. i see and know mothers that i wish i could’ve had. we all don’t get to have those. for those of you that are skeptical, i’ll just say my mother tried to kill herself several times when my sister and i were young. she blamed us for everything. we would be the butt of her jokes. she never took us to get our nails done or taught us to do our makeup. she would just tell us how she didn’t want to be a mother and tell us we didn’t want her to be happy. now that lady lives with me. and she does nothing. doesn’t even try to have a relationship with her own grandchildren who are funny, smart, cute and the best humans i’ve ever met. thank god for my wonderful kids. it’s been 7 years since she moved in and half the time i’m scared she’s going to kill us in our sleep. at least now she isn’t strong enough to. but when i’m rushing to take my kids to school in the morning and she is yelling at me to get her water i have such anger and resentment i am overwhelmed. i can’t. to “live in carer”   you probably have been lucky to have had a wonderful mother. that’s why you can’t understand it. and i’m sure you are a saint. anyone that does what you do probably is. but there are mothers out there that are serial killers, even mothers that have killed their own children. woo! i just made myself feel better about my mother. lol. i needed that! so all mothers are not absolved and all daughters don’t need to be in debted to those mothers. obviously a lot of people feel as we do, with all of the comments here so please keep it up and i hope you find peace, as i am struggling to find it with my mother as well. thank you, thank you, thank you, and amen. i can see how scary it is aging for my mother, however she has made it near impossible to empathize. she has become so selfish that when i explained that she hurts me with her hours of negative, toxic talk, she flat out said she didn’t care because she needs to talk. she is abusive to almost everyone and only sees herself. (except for her favorite child, of course… whom she is completely different with) then the guilt hits, thinking of friends who have lost a parents already. but i envy them. they lost “good” parents. not ones who are soul sucking, self centered assholes. parents they miss dearly and that didn’t try to suck the life out of their children. so, yeah… i share all the feelings of the author. and i pray that when it’s my time, i go like the “good” parents. early enough that i don’t turn into a soul sucking asshole. she’s nearly 95 and still here and still pressing my buttons. today i thought was a good day. we went for lunch. my brother and his wife came too so at least there was conversation with them. i then took her to hairdresser and when she was looking in her purse for her disabled badge to put on the windshield, she yet again couldn’t find it and i found it for her in the usual place. she then accused me of hating her. she said that three times. i said what a silly and unkind thing to say and made light of it. i’m sure she said it as she was frustrated by her forgetfulness but it pissed me off. no i don’t want to be looking after her, with her smell because she refuses to wash. but i do it anyway coz that’s what you do. even before she became so frail she was never interested in anything i did or my life at all. perhaps i reminded her of all the missed opportunities she experienced but that was of her own making. i googled her words today and this article came up and i am grateful to know there are others who feel similar. my youngest kid is about to leave home for uni and i want my freedom, not be tethered to this infirm person who makes me feel bad. do i hate her? no but i just feel indifferent and maybe she’s picking up on that. i was trying to be kind and find something quickly so she didn’t miss her appointment as well as do other tasks for her, whilst she smells. thanks mum. you’ve made it all about you again. reading this article and all the comments has helped me to feel not so alone. first of all i would like to address live in carer   you wrote “the only person on this planet that has loved you unconditionally from the moment your eyes opened until the moment she passes … ” you are sadly mistaken if you think every mother loves her children unconditionally. my mother would lash out at me and pull her so called love away if i did not measure up to her idea of what she wanted me to be, how to act, say, etc. i was expected to be an extension of her, so that i could anticipate every need of hers. she brags that us (my brother and i) would know when she wasn’t feeling well and that started when we were toddlers. she neglected any of my emotions and needs that didn’t correlate with her mindset. have you heard of adverse childhood experiences? if not, look it up, it should be eye opening for you (hopefull). anyway, back to the posts that have had ace. my heart goes out to each and every one of us. my mom is 96 and i want her to pass. she is languishing, bedridden and says she’s not ready “to go”. i have spent 1 day a week for the past 8 years, since my dad died, with her (actually started with about 2 3 days and then cut back to 1. keep in mind i work full time so this left me 1 day for myself). why do i still work? i married an alcoholic, womanizing sex addict   divorced for 20 years. she had told me repeatedly when i was younger that i was selfish, self centered, i would have no friends or boyfriends and then she would laugh and say a man would want me for one thing (sex). back to now, she was able to live on her own with a person coming in a couple of times a week until this past march (2023) when she went into eldercare because she had no strength to move on her own. she has never changed. she still has nasty comments towards me and idolizes my brother and his wife. she had told me once that she had wanted 5 boys. too bad she had a girl. she says my brothers first wife should not have had a girl and used her as a maid. then she adds that this girl (my niece) was lucky to have had all boys. i was her nurse maid when i was 7 and she had bursitis, i was even sad and depressed then. i told her the other day that i miss her. what i meant was i miss the mother i wish i had, the mother that my friends had. i pray every day for her to pass, it will be such sweet relief. i have been the primary carer of my mother who is now 80. i am in my fourties, with no family of my own, and have been living to a house next to my mother’s. she is constantly needy, not in the obvious way   because she is quite active and can take care of herself, but on an emotional level. she is very judgemental, she has an opinion about everything, she always wants to know about everything, and she is very critical of how i do things all the time. i spend hours with her daily, and i don’t want to leave her by herself (she is widowed), but i am becoming tired of the constant bickering. don’t get me wrong…. i love her deeply and i like spending time with her. but i am becoming tired of how this time of us together makes me feel… i know she wants the company too, and i don’t want to be leaving her alone. but i do not know how to handle her difficult and controlling character. and i also feel bad because if i lose my patience and answer back, she acts like the victim, shutting down and not talking to me. this behaviour makes me feel not only sad, but also guilty. i try to be calm and compassionate when i am there with her, but most of the times she will be hurtful. i do not know how to communicate to you this level of neediness… since she is both mentally and physically ok… however over the years she is becoming more and more controlling and with an opinion on everything. it is like an emotional control, which makes me feel trapped… and when i am not there, she is constantly checking on the phone, to see what i am doing, where i have been, what time i will be back home. i do not know how i can handle this…. hi gigi: many people here reveal the same feelings and issues. if you can afford it, perhaps try and find a caregiver to come and sit with your mother for a few hours a day to give you a break. care.com is a good starting resource. i was stunned to find that so many people out there are experiencing the same fragile emotions of caring for an elderly parent. i was just as stunned to read some of the harsh, judgmental comments admonishing the “feelings” this article as well as others conveyed. feelings come and go like the wind. the point is that those caring for an elderly parent are doing just that…caring for them despite the feelings they have. love is an action. if you “feel” loving while you care for a person, it will no doubt make the task a bit easier, but for those who “feel” anger and resentment, your actions of loving and caring for them are still valid. there is no guilt in that. my situation is that the anger and resentment i have is toward my 81 year old mother in law who moved in a year ago. i’m angry at not just her, but her daughter who should have taken her in because she was living alone in a much larger home. i feel resentment toward my husband who suggested it, then seemed to be just fine in letting me be the main care provider claiming he’s too busy with other things. i understand his avoidance of his mother. she nags and criticizes him as if he were a child. it’s unsettling to see how dysfunctional their relationship is…how it probably was for all 58 years of his life. i, however, never liked my mother in law and yet here i am caring for her…loving her…but hating every second of it. from the beginning, we failed to set boundaries, and are now faced with the consequences of that and will have to sit down and have a tough conversation for our own sanity. i’m not looking forward to that, but it has to be done even though i know there will be tears…lots and lots of manipulative tears. number one on the list of boundaries to discuss will be making it clear to her that our plans are not necessarily her plans. she is not a guest in this house and it is not our job to entertain her. everyday she asks, “what are “our” plans for the day..” recently, i answered, “i don’t have any plans, what are your plans?” that statement didn’t go over very well. setting boundaries is hard, and may seem mean, but it has to be done. another boundary is setting up a safe, private space that will not be entered by her unless she is having an emergency. it will most likely be our bedroom which she enters whenever she has a whim. it is so so weird to be in bed with my husband and she enters without knocking and walks over and sits down in the chair in our room to talk to us about something trivial. it totally freaks me out. the first time it happened my husband said, “what are you doing in here?” she didn’t answer, but just smiled and began to chat. that’s happened a few times, and regardless if she cries, it will not happen again. i’ve already moved the chair out of my room so she has no where to sit. she has, however, sat on my bed. i’m bracing myself for the conversation that she is not to enter my room for any reason. i could go on and on about how incredibly hard it has been to have her living with us, but because of frequent falls, living alone was not an option for her. we moved her in because of love, our actions are loving, the boundaries we set are loving ourselves, but yes, i hate this so much and know that when it’s over there will be much needed relief. because of it, i have already been having conversations with my children about how to handle things should i need to move in with them. i hope my memory of this time with my husband’s mother will not be forgotten, but rather i’d like to hold on to it so i can better understand how my children will “feel” should i need to move in with them some day. you are doing a wonderful job rj and you are right: feelings are feelings and that is why we wanted to allow them out here on a page instead of being pent up inside of everyone doing this very hard job. reading this, i wonder if we need a piece for those parents who have moved in about respecting their child’s right to have a life as well. i have heard this transgressive story over and over again and the fact that the son is not doing his part is just part of the research as well. i am still adapting to my mother’s constant talking. i can’t drive us anywhere without her telling me which lane to drive in, red light, green light, turn here, park here, bla, bla, bla, coming and going. talking while i’m trying to watch a show, always asking me what i want for dinner, reminding me the garbage needs to go out. i fucking know when the garbage goes out. i pay all the bills, while paying down my credit cards that she was supposed to pay half of for the new roof, ac unit, ect that she insisted on when we bought a house together after my peice of shit father left her after 50 years of marriage for a whore. i work all week and then i have to do her bidding on my days off and spend time with her. she is also very self absorbed, selfish and instantly catches an attitude if she is put out or inconvenienced by anything or if i go to my room for some alone time. i feel like im expected to know how to fix everything. she tries to tell me how to spend my money, but she can spend her money on whatever she wants. if i do anything she doesnt like, i hear about it. i still get told to go to sleep because i have work tomorrow! i hear about all her aches and pains daily, on top of that she is going blind! she was driving aboout 5 hours away to my brothers house for a vist, but now that her vision is going, she wont be going there anymore and my peice of shit brother can’t be bothered to come and get her. oh, i forgot, my brother is a saint! his life and endeavors are so important he can’t be bothered for anything. i just hope i die soon. how did this happen? what makes you assume your mother would feel like or ever feel like a failure? you will inevitably be in your mothers shoes someday! god forbid someone cares for you with such hidden contempt! whether she worked or not and you did is irreverent, as she was raised in an era when most women do not work. to be angry with her over something like that just shows your judgement as the ugliness it truly is. my god correct and bting to light uour selfish soul. i think these complaints about the burden of caring for aged parents are the products of an entitled, selfish mentality. these are not just any aged people but the ones who sacrificed many years of their lives to raise you, when you were an imperfect, tiresome, dependant, needy child. i just spent every moment of the last five years helping my bedridden, deaf and mute father through vascular dementia. i only regret that i did not recognise his needs earlier. to care for loved ones in their hour of need is a blessing and a privilege. i don’t consider these odious comments to be a sign of great honesty but of shameless selfishness. may you all live long enough to find that out for yourselves. thank you so much for sharing your story. i am a daughter going through a similar situation and your words helped my heart. usha you can piss right off you know you’re the demanding elder. stop it, i’ve been taking care of my mother since i was a child. i’ll be dead before she is and i’m done this wasn’t what i was searching for but this is what i needed to read! thank you. i don’t feel so alone and confused now. i’m still raising my kids and my partner runs a business and my mother expects me to leave them and travel to her across state to care for her for months. not only that, i’m trying to restart my career and have a life. it’s just impossible. she needs to move closer or accept professional carers, which she can afford. she pushed me to move away and go to university and now expects me to ditch my life and become her carer now she’s ill. i know it’s hard and simply awful for her. it’s also an impossible situation for me… and the endless negative talk is real! she also never asks about my life when we talk, it’s all about her and her grandkids or even my partner. i just exist as an outlet to hear her complaints… which is fine up to a point, but life is already exhausting and i’m out of energy at this point. she expects me not to work because she didn’t and she can’t relate   fine (putting aside encouraging me into going to college/have a career)   but i have kids at home who need care, a partner who needs support, a million other things to do, too. i have a life i can’t abandon. i’m not doing nothing! i don’t want her to be alone but i can’t do anything about it at this point and she won’t move… but i think she’s starting to listen and figure it out… i hope… there are no easy answers, clearly. life is complex. when people decide to have children and become caregivers themselves, that doesn’t mean their children can be expected to want to be caregivers when those parents reach old age   this is the real entitlement issue! it’s not 1850, there’s many better options for all parties most of the time. we don’t all live together and on top of each other anymore   if we’re privileged to have better living conditions and lifestyles, why shouldn’t we live better? and differently? why shouldn’t our children live better, freer lives than we did, too? if our children want to be elderly caregivers, fine, but expecting it, demanding it   that is selfish. not being on call to be your parent’s nurse doesn’t mean you don’t care or help out! not everyone wants to, or has the skills, or is in the same situation to be able to properly and effectively help. the martyrdom dripping off some comments reeks of entitlement and personal fears of ageing. who would want to dump that baggage on their kids? the world has changed   for the better   and demanding others conform to antiquated notions of less desirable, less effective elderly care is not going to undo the changes. where there are better options for fewer burdens, we should be grateful, not clingy and needy. and maybe you aren’t the best carer for your own elderly parents either   you should want the best care you can get for them. and in a lot of cases, it’s probably not you. amazing so many people applaud this way of dealing with a parent’s end of life. suck it up. stop denying them the pain of their end, however shitty they were, and grow up. divide responsibilities with your sibs. i am disgusted by this modern trend to over emphasize our personal pain, while we mete out punishment to others in the name of living true to ourselves what a narrow view of life. bad karma too. often the debris of these “boundaries” puts on others the very kind of behavior this “clear” daughter so reviles from her mother and life. hi, i related to your article so much. for the past two years been caring for my elderly 92 year old mum. my one sibling is dead, so just me left to do it. the hospital admission of 8 weeks was the worst, due to pathetic hospitals in uk currently. i was there daily and she was left on corridors in an and e so many times, then caring for her at home. then endless problems and moaning over carers and friends i got to assist her. i went through every range of emotions too. and my life and independence was suddenly non existent, and hardly saw friends from that moment on. i had to journal daily and meditate to get through the worst bits. things have got easier since she moved into assisted living. she neglected me of love and support growing up, so i too found it hard when roles were reversed. but i’ve learnt to pick my arguments with her now, tried to drop all the judgement and resentment and we have kind of come to a peaceful enjoyable stage now. prob because i have a lot of help from the carers in her home. so gives me a lot of relief. i don’t believe you can be totally honest with them, as this would hurt the feelings so much, and cause more stress. so just learn to let things go ( learnt in meditation) and yoga. and take of yourself in the process. we are not quite at the death stage just at the moment, that is yet to come. so i’m sure there will be even more rocky patches ahead. but as far as caring is concerned it certainly isn’t for me either. it’s knackering playing so many roles, and trying to support them. advocate, lady in waiting, waitress, chauffeur, carer for hospital appts, financier, and all the other long list of duties. god help the poor people that have to endure this for many years or who have a disabled child or relative. my heart goes out to them.it does make you a more compassionate person though through it all. i wish you all the best and hope things improve. quit denying and ignoring the pain and utter anguish which comes from a slow painful death. quit focusing on yourself. be a loving caregiver. if you can’t be a loving caregiver to your own parents, newsflash, you’re a probably a terrible, selfish person. lol hillarious there are so many comments though… my situation is not exactly the same of course but i have been looking after, supporting and saving my negative, self absorbed mother from herself since i was 27 with the help, thank goodness, of my brother. now she is old she is a concentrated version of herself. thank you for your honesty makes me feel less guily for my frustration and despair. she has had very little ill health in her life but has never learned to be able to deal with the ups and downs of life herself or even acknowledge that she wants everyone to make her happy. she rarely has been i think. i have never been able to share any problems i have with her as she would turn it into a reason to be miserable and sorry for herself because she ‘ worries about me’ eg when i had cancer she did not know many years ago. she is well cared for with carers, visitors, a wellbeing coach, medication to match her needs, caring doctors, neighbours visit , i stay with her for long periods altho my home is a long way away and my brother comes in 2 3 times a day. i am tired, frustrated and despairing. i love her very much……… please do not berate those who share feeling like this   i have been told so many times i should feel privileged to care for her or that i should stop it and look after myself. i think these comments make me the most miserable. please listen to those who are honestly sharing and do not judge. we do not want you to fix us or her   we know you cant and yes, we know we will mourn deeply in the end. i have been and am on both sides of this. my mom passed at 94 about two years ago and i was always working to get whatever little item/help would make her life easier. you sound like your mom was not independent enough in her 90’s? and even compared her with like others? i would never want my daughter, or son, to have hidden (or not) contempt for me. i have an honest relationship with them both. we laught at what is to come and hope for the best. and we will work out the best solution for everyone one day. i hope you can forgive yourself for this attitude because as the very true saying goes, “if i knew then what i know now”. it. will. hurt. but we know when we know. i would do some things over, but i was very honest with my mom and i am so grateful for our relationship of my whole 68 years until her wonderful age of 94. comment δdocument.getelementbyid( "ak_js_1" ).setattribute( "value", ( new date() ).gettime() ); share reinvention by lesley jane seymour 6 min read book lists by harriet riley 7 min read your community by lesley jane seymour 4 min read copyright © coveyclub 2025 site by six

sign up sign in sign up sign in vinod khosla follow    12 listen share we don’t make most of the food we eat, we don’t grow it, anyway. we wear clothes other people make, we speak a language other people developed, we use a mathematics other people evolved and spent their lives building. i mean we’re constantly taking things. it’s a wonderful esctatic feeling to create something and put it into the pool of human experience and knowledge.”   steve jobs 1. the summary as a technology optimist i like to say, “what can be imagined technologically reasonably can be invented” is more true than not and more a matter of time and focus. technology and new inventions have always shaped the human world, and have disrupted the way we live and work, and yet we are only at the beginning. innovation in the areas of food, digitization, robotics, artificial intelligence, as a few examples, have the potential to achieve food abundance, reshape cities, knit humanity, and enhance human capability exponentially. the big needs in society, food, health, housing, transportation, financial services, entertainment and more are being and will even more so be reinvented by technology in an “increasingly more accessible to all” way. we need to turbocharge our efforts to utilize technology to accelerate accessibility. many of society’s gdp and business related needs are being reinvented everyday in a truly innovative and non institutional way. seven hundred million (or so) people have the rich lifestyle, either in environment, energy, housing, healthcare, education, food, that seven billion people on this planet want. technology is the necessary, though not sufficient, resource multiplier. it’s the only thing that can multiply resources. technology will enable bridging this gap here, and the key word being “non institutional” reinvention is not only powerful in increasing innovation, and but more importantly for accessibility. the future and my admiration belongs to those dreamers who think of these unreasonable possibilities, who aren’t afraid of the high probability of failure, and who take, bold and, radical risks. they are willing to change the world by imagining what’s possible. so, what comes next for reinvention? public transportation? construction? buildings? healthcare? food? cities? communications? companionship? financial system? imagine the possible and take it from impossible to improbable to possible, but then again unlikely to plausible to probably to real! individual entrepreneurs and their passion for a vision (and tons of good luck) give the improbable reality a shot. now, many, even most, of these attempts will fail and the press will denigrate you for hubris, arrogance, fraud, naivety, and much more. even so, it is these improbable attempts that will, when they occasionally squeak by the “existing reality, institutional noise (and fear)” will change the world (hopefully mostly for good). the future is not knowable, but it is inevitable and inventable so we need great entrepreneurs and technologists to invent the future. if there is a 90 percent chance of failure on a transformative project then we have a 10 percent chance of transforming the world. that’s pretty great. if we have ten attempts (preferably a 100!) each at many different areas covered in this essay we will really change the world. even if most attempts fail, change and innovation will be technology driven, non institutional, let’s break the rules, radical kind of approach. and in this non institutional way of doing things though less predictable is way more exciting and probably the main way we will get to getting seven billion people the kind of lifestyle they’d all want. machines and systems can do medicine better than humans. but that’s just one of many. or that most jobs will be replaced or fusion energy is possible in my lifetime or that ai can make work an option for most people who will work if they want to work, but not need to work because we will have sufficient abundance. imagine the possible! as yogi berra said “it’s tough to make predictions, especially about the future”, but if there is an answer this speculation is more likely to be right than any other single prediction i can think of. this reinvention will be chaotic, disruptive, unpredictable with many failed attempts, but failure won’t matter; the sparse successes will. the disruption will be temporarily painful to some as being disrupted is never fun. we have to get things right and meet society’s expectations of technology to help equality, diversity and more. new technologies also rock the world by reallocating power and wealth and accentuating inequality. fortunately capitalism is by permission of democracy and the electorate will have the ability to rectify the inequalities if it isn’t self regulated by the technologists. all these social factors will become urgent and critical to enable this transformation through democracy and the people who will be impacted. it’s impact in the less democratic societies is harder to predict. 2. we need large innovations! as a technology optimist, i like to think “what can be imagined technologically can be invented” is more true than not, though on unpredictable timelines. technology has always shaped the world and currently it is disrupting the way people work, live, and associate by providing radically new tools. new technologies are rewriting human aspirations. innovations in the areas of clean energy, food technology, digitization, robotics, artificial intelligence, 3d printing, transportation have the potential to mitigate climate change , achieve food abundance, reshape cities, knit humanity, and enhance human capability exponentially. but the future, as william gibson wrote, isn’t evenly distributed. some areas are making rapid progress while others need turbocharging! and though a technology trajectory may be established when it has a few percent penetration of the population, penetration itself may take a decade or more after the path gets cast! entrepreneurs are leveraging technology to reinvent the big needs in society, food, health, housing, transportation, financial services, entertainment, and more in a more democratic and accessible way though here again broad accessibility needs more turbocharging. the mechanism of invention by the “drivers of reinvention,” mostly capitalism and entrepreneurship, tends to focus the drivers on shorter term profit maximization (as it should be for them to survive and flourish) rather than societal good maximization, generally. the power of ideas driven often by technology and entrepreneurial energy are laying by the wayside institutional views about society’s providers. what seems most exciting is that many of society’s gdp and business related needs are being reinvented everyday and all this is done in a very innovative and non institutional way. the big needs in society, food, health, housing, transportation, financial services, entertainment and more are being and will even more so be reinvented by technology in an “increasingly more accessible to all” way. we need to turbocharge our efforts to utilize technology to accelerate accessibility. many of society’s gdp and business related needs are being reinvented everyday in a truly innovative and non institutional way. non institutional reinvention is a powerful means of increasing innovation, sustainable abundance, and eventually, accessibility. it all comes down to the fact institutions look back on the past to predict the future, instead of reinventing the futures the way entrepreneurs are able to. such approach, perhaps optimistically, may provide us resources and time to address other pressing societal need, such as socio emotional or environmental. approximately seven hundred million people live the resource rich lifestyle (environment rich, energy rich, housing rich, health care rich, education rich, food rich ) that seven billion people on this planet want. there is a minimal level of basic needs that would make wealth secondary for many if not most people, i believe, and they will focus on other pleasures/passions, goals, interests, etc. i assume that to be roughly 90% percentile level today, or level of the best off 700 million people on the planet. can we get 7 billion people to that level of resource richness in education, housing, transportation, healthcare without resource shortages and planet destruction? technology, innovation and invention are necessary, even if not sufficient by themselves, to make this happen. what we really need are dreamers who can imagine the impossible and make it happen. instead of being pragmatic, such people ask “why not?” and with their entrepreneurial energy try and make these dreams come true. technology is the necessary, though not sufficient, resource multiplier. it’s the principle thing that can multiply resources. we need a 10x in resource utilization multiplication without needing 10x in the number of doctors, the number of buildings, the number of cars. recently, i looked at all major parts of the non governmental gdp in the united states and asked “what couldn’t be reinvented?” not by 5% better, 10% better, but by 100% better, 500%, even 1000% better. technology will enable bridging this gap here, but the key word here is “non institutional” reinvention which is not only powerful in increasing innovation, but equally importantly for accessibility. the keys are individual entrepreneurs and their passion for a vision. no matter how ludicrous their idea might seem, they give the improbable a shot. of course, one needs tons of good luck, and many, probably most, of these attempts will fail. the press and other critics will have a field day and denigrate them for hubris, arrogance, fraud, naivete, and worse. however, it is these improbable attempts that will, when they occasionally squeak by the “wall of existing reality and institutional noise,” , disbelief, resistance fear and finally competition” will change the world (hopefully mostly for good). the future is not knowable, but it is inevitable and inventable so we need great entrepreneurs and technologists to invent the future they (and we) want. not all changes are positive, but even in worst cases, there’s room to iterate to solutions. this iteration process and fits and starts are part and parcel of most large innovations. the future and my admiration belongs to those dreamers and “possibilities” who think of these unreasonable possibilities, who aren’t afraid of the high probability of failure, and who take, bold and, radical risks. they are willing to change the world by imagining what’s possible. so, what comes next for reinvention? public transportation? construction? buildings? healthcare? food? cities? communications? companionship? financial system? imagine the possible and take it from impossible to improbable to possible to probably to real! individual entrepreneurs and their passion for a vision (and tons of good luck and high accompaniment of failures) give the improbable reality a shot. now, many, even most, of these attempts will fail and the press will denigrate the entrepreneurs for hubris, arrogance, fraud, naivety, and much more. in twenty years when we look back at the pundits, reports, studies, and consultants we will find them to be largely wrong about the future of societal change. i shiver every time i see a un report, a mckinsey report, or an econometric projection going beyond the span of five years, especially coming from those pundits who have never done much themselves except pontificate. instead of networking and all of the talk at davos, for example, which that has little effect and a lot of retrospective predictors and extrapolation of the past, it’s much better to do and build the future is not knowable, but it is “inventable” and inevitable and discoverable through iterative learning and trial and error. therefore, great entrepreneurs and technologists, please invent the future you want! the skeptics never did the impossible with their focus on why things won’t work. optimists attempt more, fail much more, and achieve more. 3. it’s almost always the entrepreneurs, not institutions, that drive big innovations let’s take a quick look at things not imaginable by the institutional view. all you need to do is look back to 1995 and imagine the internet upending telecom and all that has happened since. at&t wireless was sold to cingular (formed only in 2000) for $40 billion in 2004 (the technical details were more complex   later on in 2005, sbc communications inc. acquires at&t corp., becomes at&t inc. and then in 2006, at&t inc. and bellsouth corp. merge) and whatsapp was sold for half the price to facebook a decade later. why? at&t was slow to adapt to cellular and the internet. in fact they insisted that tcp/ip, the core protocol of the internet, was not appropriate for public networks and atm was their technology of choice. outsiders purchased the rest of at&t during its decline and it ended up in the hands of sbc, the parent company that formed cingular. only the at&t brand remains, and of course the remnant assets. why is non institutional innovation so necessary? looking back in the last twenty years, the internet upended telecom (at&t refused to adopt to the internet and cellular till much later), amazon upended retail with a clear vision of changing choice, processes, and cost structure that walmart could not imagine. google upended libraries, advertising, media, and many undefined industries. amazon, along with netflix, youtube, and others are upending hollywood and television. over the last decade, netflix has reinvented tv/entertainment, and facebook/youtube/twitter reinvented media and may even reinvent elections and politics! and speaking of elections, trump reinvented political campaigns using twitter as a destructive tool against a well managed “proper” political campaign. even institutional measurements of our goals like gdp are being upended. google and facebook’s success, in fact, reduces gdp as it makes previously valuable tasks free! cellular is dominating landlines. the iphone, barely existed ten years ago when the venerable nokia and motorola ruled the mobile phone world. uber reinvented the limousine service and the taxi service, and it will likely drive changes to public transportation. airbnb is starting to change hotels, or at least a subset of that market. instagram and google photos invented or reinvented the way we take, manage, and share memories in our lives. what about many other examples like space (spacex), cars (tesla), pharma (genetech), etc? why is non institutional invention so necessary? most people in business reduce the risk of failure to the point where the consequences of success are inconsequential on society, but they can make money for their shareholders as they are obligated to. my philosophy is different. i’d rather invest in something with a higher probability of failure if the consequences of success are consequential. there is as much profit and increased social impact to be gained here, although with a higher variability. as i like to say, my willingness to fail gives me the ability to succeed. that is the exact opposite of how incentives are usually set up in larger, non founder led institutions. structure, processes, key metrics, and compensation incentives at large institutions oftentimes have the opposite effect to the expected one and often actually fuel and attract risk aversion for true innovation. without risk and its concomitant failure, large innovation is just the matter of luck. you get the picture here. these industries were not reinvented by large corporations, but in fact the power of ideas driven by technological advances and entrepreneurial energy. most people in business reduce the risk of failure to the point where the consequences of success are inconsequential on society (but they can make money for their shareholders which they are obligated to do). instead, the ideas that change the way we live and work are the ones that originally have a sparser space of higher probability of failure, but the consequences of success are consequential. there is as much profit and increased social impact to be gained through higher variability. as i personally say, my willingness to fail gives me the ability to succeed and contribute in my small way in causing good change to happen. in my view, it is only improbables that are important, we just don’t know which improbable when it comes to large changes and innovations! most experts and institutions assume improbable is unimportant (with only a few exceptions where true risk can be parlayed to someone else). we have incumbents, institutions, consultants, and pundits predicting more of the same “extrapolation of the past to predict the future” worldview. some are well meaning, while others are driven by personal or institutional self interest. they are authoritative and mostly wrong when it comes to large changes or big innovations. mckinsey reports and fancy speeches at davos notwithstanding. there is a dissonance between them and technology entrepreneurs: the former believe improbable is not important, the latter think similarly of the status quo. personally, i think mostly the improbables are important, but we just don’t know which one it is. this is the exact opposite of how incentives are usually set up in larger, non founder led institutions. we have incumbents, institutions, and pundits predicting more of the same “extrapolation of the past” to “predict the future” world view. they focus on incremental predictable progress from year to year. most of their predictions are wrong when it comes to large changes or big innovations and their impact. i’d give you odds that few large innovations will come out of any institutional player. it is only improbables that are important. large institutions generally believe improbable is not important, while technology entrepreneurs believe the usual is not important. improbable is what creates the next facebook, google, apple, uber, or airbnb, netflix, square, paypal driven, of course, by an entrepreneur’s vision of the unreasonable possibility. luckily, most of these players i named are still driven by founder vision, and aren’t sensible in the way business school professors would teach their students. these founders ask “why not?” and “why not try it?” be it alexa, aws, space, driverless cars, global location maps, phones without keyboards. big companies do help scale innovation and bring gobs of capital later when risk of a new phenomenon is low (the tesla playing field for the next decade or so). but it’s the seeds   what uber, tesla, google with waymo and driverless cars will do to completely replace much of transportation, as an example, with a new style of public and private transportation (this was inconceivable even five years ago by anyone in automobile, transportation business or city planning and is still largely being ignored in city planning)? can we today envision a 10x better hamburger supply chain? change happens but is not credible until after the fact. retrospective predictability by pundits is common, but until large change happens one sees mostly skepticism. i have hence come to believe in the power of ideas driven by entrepreneurial energy by almost foolish, somewhat naive entrepreneurs, by those who didn’t know what could not be done. almost no major change is driven by institutions that one would expect to have power to cause that change! did walmart innovate retail or amazon? did boeing/lockheed innovate space or spacex? did gm innovate cars or tesla and waymo? did youtube/netflix/facebook/twitter innovate media or nbc? is there any area where a major innovation came from an institutional? 4. beyond the entrepreneur, what does it take? so imagine the possible in the many of the areas of interest and let’s imagine the axes and tools of innovation. the way i think about it is the greater the number of “axes”   that is the dimensions in which innovation is possible, and the better the tools for innovation, experimentation, and lower the cost of trials for ideas   the faster the rate of change. that means a bigger possibility of a surprise like an amazon disrupting retail or tesla and google changing transportation with electric and driverless cars, respectively. computers and computation as a tool allow for innovation in practically any field, be it in biology, space exploration, or information technologies. that was compounded by networking (of people, computers, and things) through the internet which allowed the lowly landline phone to morph into today’s mobile which, paradoxically, is mostly used for everything other than talking. the device, though, impacted so many areas of our life. this was unimaginable even two decades ago at the birth of the internet and was still unclear even after its commercialization with the founding of netscape in 1995. so, what is in store for us for the next twenty years? it’s hard to forecast, but easier to speculate. it seems likely that 3d manufacturing, artificial intelligence, biology tools especially   new physics based tools, biology fashions like crispr and it’s likely successors for precision biology and computational biology, along with traditional old standbys like increased computing and bandwidth will all form a soup which catalyzes many new ideas and reactions. now, add to the soup the potential for new types of computing, like quantum computing, which might accelerate ai even beyond our wildest imagination. the possibilities become truly unpredictable. here i speculate (i never claim to be able to predict anything) basing just on technology paths that seem plausible, even if they are improbable today. i don’t posit yet atomic level assembly of objects, but just using improvements in 3d printing, voice communication, ai, and basic quantum simulations. i am not imagining here completely new axis that will surely happen like broad quantum computing, fusion energy, or molecular assembly. there are many axes of innovation that are opening up so the next decade or two look promising. i won’t mention all of them here. there are some i expect but seem too speculative even for me. others, on the other hand, i haven’t dreamed off but are today being developed by smart people all over the world in research efforts. to make it possible, you need new tools and technical breakthroughs, a visionary and persistent founder, and evangelizing market participants with a passion for the vision. they must understand where this vision is going, and they need to be convinced they need to come along and ultimately change, especially if it’s radical innovation. for instance, automotive companies had little appetite for electric vehicles. nevertheless, elon musk had both the vision and the determination to create electric cars and gain adoption; that that allowed him to disrupt the automotive industry by building a better, more efficient car while paving the way for an autonomous future, as some would say. there’s also a difference between invention and socially effective innovation, and then scaling which the innovator may or may not be involved. for while it’s still not universally accepted, it has taken convincing the likes of government regulators, financial institutions, technology thought leaders, media, and the general public to change behavior and ways of doing what they were doing. as mahatma gandhi said, “first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” many institutions have business interests that will cause them to slow down these changes. there are also many pretend social change enrtepreneurs taking advantage of their “story” with little more than financial goals or hollow sincerity to the causes they profess. but the wheat comes with the chaff unfortunately. there are macro trends, too. marc andreessen said “software eating the world” because it was the easiest way to describe what was happening. the same is happening with ai eating the world, as well as computational design, blockchain and 3d printing. some of the tools and axes of innovation defined below will end up being transformative, most likely this will be the case of ai, others will just be rapid facilitators. older technologies, like mobile and internet, will keep turbocharging these newer innovations. 5. looking at the infrastructure of society, what can be reimagined and reinvented? let’s take a closer, albeit speculative, look at possible ways in which these revolutions fundamental to a better world imagined by the majority of us and the economists, might happen. while other definitions of “better worlds” are possible, that is something left for a different discussion. where could a single entrepreneur driven by passion and a vision enter the market with simple products and drive to much larger scale over twenty years or so? remember that twenty years ago in 1997 google didn’t exist, and neither did facebook. media had not felt the push of facebook, youtube, twitter. amazon was very nascent and not yet starting to reinvent retail. apple was under traditional “proper management” struggling to survive, while uber, airbnb, pinterest were not even glimmers. phones were made by traditional institutions like motorola and nokia, the mobile phone as we know it did not exist, and the motorola and nokia phones were mostly used for “talking.” there was no “app for that”. india was still trying to scale only landlines! i was personally ridiculed when i suggested then that the internet should not be atm protocols but rather tcp/ip. in fact, juniper networks was the only company committed to building tcp/ip internet protocols for the public internet (no, cisco was building routers for the internet but had bought an atm protocol company that would be their public internet network play). going further back through my career, in 1985 the idea of a computer in every home was considered absurd, grandma using email in 1990 was thought ridiculous, and the internet was a crazy idea and never going to be an important public network in 1995. at&t assumed that 64 kbps isdn was all the data anyone needed. what are the non governmental components of gdp that can be re imagined/reinvented with an entrepreneurial rather than a policy/legislative/regulatory approach? transportation and related city services health, disease diagnosis and management, drug discovery manufacturing, construction, buildings, building efficiency and cities food and agriculture financial, insurance and legal services energy consumer consumption items, services, education, durable goods most of the non governmental components of gdp can be re imagined and reinvented with an entrepreneurial rather than a policy/legislative/regulatory approach (which will usually follow later) be it 1) transportation and related city services 2) health, disease diagnosis and management, drug discovery 3) manufacturing, construction, buildings, building efficiency and cities 4) food and agriculture 5) financial, insurance and legal services 6) energy 7) consumer consumption items, services, education, durable goods. we’ll look at each of these individually, but suffice it to say that almost all the non government components of gdp can be reinvented with hundreds of percentages change in their resource intensity, cost, quality, and accessibility   be it education, healthcare, transportation, housing, financial services, consumer products and services, and more! large change happens, but is not credible until after the fact. retrospective predictability by pundits is common, but until large change happens one sees mostly skepticism, as witnessed by the number of electric cars forecast in 2010 or the political support for trump forecast in early 2016. i have hence come to believe in the power of ideas driven by entrepreneurial energy by almost foolish, somewhat naive entrepreneurs, by those who didn’t know what could not be done. most major change is not driven by institutions that one would expect to have power to cause that change! skeptics never did the impossible! they are often right, but wrong when it matters the most. 6. the technology soup enabling societal innovations fundamental reinvention has never been more possible than it is today. there are a range of new recent technological axes of development that give me hope. driver technology tools that are plausible and visible today and are feeding on each other and on other research include: ai and large scale data capability robotics additive manufacturing / 3d printing biotechnology (“omic measurement”, crispr, gene synthesis, precision control of genes, pathways…) computational design, computational modelling/simulation for materials ot process to biology and more social connectivity and networking; distributed access software eating the world blockchain increasing research breakthroughs in all areas other new still fermenting ideas i have surely missed or underestimated (open for candidate suggestions) fundamental reinvention has never been more possible than it is today. there are a range of new recent technological axes of development that give me hope. driver technologies that are plausible and visible today are listed above. the “older technologies” that will continue to be axes of innovation that continue to have impact and provide benefit include: software, computing and cloud computing, internet, semiconductor technologies, financial instruments, sensors, cameras and mobile. artificial intelligence ai will, inevitably, change the structure of our society. this is a statement about exciting future technical developments, and an observation about what is mostly possible in the near term , although has not yet achieved widespread adoption. the rate of change of new ai capability, the building block for changing businesses and human activity, is very rapidly expanding. fundamentally, we can now or soon will be able to achieve human like (and occasionally super human) performance on tasks that were, just a few years ago, regarded as completely out of reach for machines. probably the greatest example is computer vision. it was stagnant for decades, but has made so much progress in the last years we can now have computers classify images and videos with super human performance, provided we have enough training data in the domain, be it face recognition or reading mri images. the same is becoming true in recognizing human speech and even generating voice, or reading someone’s mood or mental health status from their voice in superhuman ways. just thinking about machines with the capability to understand vision and recognizing voice by itself, will fundamentally change how we think of work in general and what our interface with machines will look like in the future. that being said, there is likely an even greater progress possible near term. currently, the best performing ai systems require huge amounts of data to train to human like performance. however, work is underway to reduce this burden in various domains; often all is needed are humans being to feed just a few examples to guide the neural nets. this will enable us to apply ai to domains where little data exists or the data is hard to get for structural or legal reasons, greatly widening the applicability of ai in all business and societal processes. model building of the world as humans do is another dimension of innovation, for example, an ai may be able to predict how much force would knock over a glass of water. ais are also learning fast from the world of simulations and games. i suspect the lego blocks of intelligence will expand from a few (names like cnn’s, rnn’s, gan’s, to more recent additions like probabilistic programming, bayes nets (redone), graph models, …. to all kinds of new capability hard to predict or name today) to many different types of intelligences capable of being combined to do unusual things; much like today’s lego blocks sets can enable building very complex structures compared to the original red and yellow blocks that allowed us to mostly build simplistic things. it is not only the ability of ai to “judge” and recognize images and audio that is a driver here. we are now on the cusp of having ai generate images in a domain, at high resolution, and high quality that mimic art or any desired input distribution. the same now goes for music where we can create ai that can mimic and improvise play in any style. “creativity” used to be one of the standard answers to the question of what defines humanity. nonetheless, it looks increasingly doubtful that even that claim is irrefutable. one day, we might see a short film,generated solely by an ai or a top ten music hit that never had a human composer or a new art style generated by ai that appeals to humans one last comment that should make us quite hopeful about the accessibility of these technologies is that most of the fundamental breakthroughs have been out in the open, published, and discussed publicly. yes, ai talent is hard to come by today. at the same time, it is also one of the most popular areas of study these days and sooner or later this challenge is going to be overcome. coupled with high quality frameworks for ai research and deployment now being freely available as open source, rapid progress on both research and applications is at hand. in a talk to the national bureau of economic research on the “economic implications of ai,” i looked at the top twenty employment categories in the us and concluded most jobs in most of these categories would be eliminated or change substantially for humans. technology will reallocate where and how people spend time and resources. we will have great abundance, growing productivity, and gdp but with increasing income disparity. further, changes will be slow, almost imperceptible in terms of employment the first five or ten years, and take decades before going exponential in actual number of jobs impacted. but by the time the first 5 percent of jobs are impacted, the future will be inevitable. robotics: the renewed interest in robotics is, to a large extent, similar to the renewed interest in ai. for a long time we had robots that were amazingly durable, amazingly precise, but fundamentally simply examples of good mechanical engineering and careful motor control. this was enough to solve manufacturing tasks in very structured environments where all parts have defined positions and the manufacturing line does not change rapidly. a core example here is the chassis production of cars which has little human involvement today. but no robot could replace a human in the sorting of eggs by size and grade, only human assembly line workers could do that. they were mostly programmed machines, but not rapidly and broadly learning machines. the new path in robotics involves robots that can make decisions in a largely unstructured environment. probably the most discussed example of this today are self driving cars that have to make decisions in the real world and not in a defined, pre planned environment. but there are other, equally broad implications on the horizon. a company struggling with automation due to dealing with soft materials and rapidly changing product mixes right now faces large costs of automation. however, the next generation robots might change this by being able to learn new tasks rapidly on little data and with no programming the main driver for this is two fold. one is straightforward: it is simply the availability of very low cost, high resolution sensors, in particular camera systems., microphones, ultrasonics, radar and other environmental acquisition technologies. the other boils down to the fact we can now interpret vision and 3d data by learning from examples instead of having to hand code the rules. reinforcement learning, learning from simulation, and understanding how to reduce the training samples required are the core elements of modern robotics. adding general learning including concepts, concept hierarchies physics, and more will happen. those robots are a very different breed from the old and the trade off space will be vastly different. formerly, we got precision from adding tighter motor control or heavier arms.. this new class of robots have cheaper, lighter arms and still get the precision back by relying on visual servoing. in essence, it means the vision system is able to correct the robotic arm as it gets close to the object we wish to manipulate. a robot arm capable of doing human tasks should not weigh any more than a human arm does and then scale sub linearly from there. this makes this next generation of robots cheaper, able to handle very flexible tasks, and quick to deal with environments that have been thought as impossible in robotics before. there will be many contributions to robotics, but ai learning systems will be a big factor. from a societal and economic perspective this enables a completely new way of thinking about production lines. proximity to the end customer, thus, becomes more important than the availability of cheap labor for menial tasks in unstructured environments or the need for scale. this is especially true when combined with new technologies like 3d printing. custom, personalized, and local may become economically better in areas like producing jeans, sofas and beds or many types of fresh food. additive manufacturing/3d printing additive manufacturing  in essence printing objects instead of manufacturing them traditionally   has already made inroads in multiple areas. it consists of a family of technologies that can manufacture polymer parts to high density metal parts. even composites are being 3d printed. the current beachheads for those technologies have been largely in design and prototyping environments. this means shortening the design cycle as we can almost instantly have a prototype part; it has actually already become a standard feature for many industries. this is, however, changing and with robotics. for instance, we are seeing a complete transformation of supply change and materials with one of our companies, feetz, that’s reinventing how shoes are made. we are seeing more and more production parts made by additive manufacturing. using these techniques to create performance critical parts that are not manufacturable with traditional methods is already becoming commonplace. examples here include turbine parts, rocket engine components, and implants. this acts as the key catalyst to move the industry from using the technology for prototyping to a manufacturing regime. we climb down the cost curve as an ever greater number of parts that used to be hard to customize, not buildable at all, or consisted of multiple assemblies, can now be built with these machines. we are now tackling some of the fundamental limitations of the technology, such as cost per part, materials we can use, removal or avoidance of necessary support structures to make this family of technologies even more widely applicable. these technologies, in turn, are also changing conventional wisdom like benefits of scale, locations, and schedules for manufacturing, supply chains, spare parts, or maintenance. do we need to make shoes in china for us consumption or can they be 3d printed locally and customized to each foot? do we need to stock every spare part for a boeing 727 in every airport in the world? should it take six months to get a sofa manufactured in china only to see it does not fit in your small studio apartment? this has significant consequences for the way we think about complexity in our design. if complexity becomes in essence free, that is not tied to manufacturing steps, our possible design space explodes. in particular, if manufacturing complexity is not the bottleneck or cost factor anymore, designing structures will be the new bottleneck. instead of designing by hand, we will likely create them by specifying the input loads and tasks fed into ai systems. optimization software will process the data to create structures looking a lot more organically than now and producible only by additive manufacturing. the technologies of robotics, ai, 3d printing, will feed on each other making exponential change on products, materials, and supply chains. computational design / learning physics in design of objects we have long used computer tools from eda tools for the electronics industry to cad tools for physical objects and from simulations for verification of performance of the designed objects. we are now moving into a regime where the actual act of designing a structure is now becoming part of the duty of our tools and humans act more as a trainer, judge and specifier of external conditions. and even those roles may change to just specifying goals given constraints and preferences. let’s take designing a structure for an aircraft. it has to fulfill various structural loads and remain as light as possible at the same time. we will in the coming decades let the algorithms decide the design to minimize weight and specify the external loads. this has been possible before via optimization procedures, but unlike before, we can “learn” from past successful designs and guide the search space and be much less dependent on human guidance or judgement. in no place is this more apparent than in the design of drug targets. instead of running quantum simulations to understand the binding of molecules to targets, a slow and costly procedure, at systems in the future be able to learn from past binding data to automatically come up with novel designs that might be good candidates for a new drug. a general principle behind it being that even though we often understand the underlying physics of what we are trying to design, the exploration process is too costly to run by brute force exploration of the design space. learning from past successful designs, be they molecules designed for a target, physical objects, or different layouts on a circuit board, allows us to meaningfully change the performance of these objects. we may soon see a new range of computationally designed materials beyond copper, steel, and aluminium alloys for everything, from medical devices to body organs to your car and sofa. a decade ago computers learnt to beat humans at chess by brute force computation. soon systems like alphago zero will use “intuition” to do the same to make designs, drugs, and materials. biotechnology/crispr innovations in biotechnology might be grouped into three different levels: measurement, understanding/modeling, and modification. our ability to measure biomolecules at continually higher resolution and in greater bandwidth is enabling steady improvements of our measurements of individual organisms (like humans), but also groups of organisms (from the microbiome of a human gut to the complex commensal relationships of organisms in a coral reef or in a patch of forest floor). this amount of data acquisition these days is extremely complex and high dimensional. currently, only ai is able to create accurate predictive models and, thus, an efficient form of understanding the data. this, however, requires considerable advances in data storage and analytics. the third element is in the increasingly advanced and precise toolkit being developed for editing biology down to a single molecule. tools like the cas family of crispr associated proteins are enabling very specific, rapid editing of dna, the blueprint for most of what we consider living things. these capabilities will dramatically improve and become more diverse over time. george church has likened studying the diversity and complexity of biology to an advanced alien civilization leaving all its technology in our backyard for us to analyze. biology has been able to create the machinery to very efficiently convert wide ranges of energy from one form to another,. it is able to harness that energy into vast abilities to transmute forms of matter. this alchemy of biology still produces the vast majority of materials of interest to humanity. we are developing a deep control of the machinery of biology, which is just as crucial as the initial domestication of plants and animals thousands of years ago. synthetic biology will impact chemicals and materials, energy, and human and animal editing, which will have great economic and societal implications. these and future capabilities will give us god like powers (with its benefits and danger) over the next decade or two. food products and pharmaceuticals are largely the result of biochemical processes. basic components of our environment, like the oxygen we require to breathe, are the result of biological processes. changing these systems with tools like a shovel or hammer would be impossible. however, we are gaining the potential to have molecular level control of all living things, giving us powerful new ways of combating issues like food security or climate change. if human history has been a push to control of the world for human good, then we are at the start a major new type of development. this process started with the quest for control over environmental exposure by development of fire, buildings, and clothing; extending to gaining control over supply of food and materials by domestication of plants and animals, efficient agriculture, creating mining and mineral extraction and the industrial revolution; and then recently control over information and data through the development of language and literacy to modern methods of data transmission, storage, and analysis. for the first time, we are gaining control over modifying ourselves directly biohackers are already crispr hacking their own bodies. it will become systematic starting with fixing genetic defects in babies. the tools for editing dna are only the first step in modifying the physiology of an adult living being. in order to do this, we have to target the cells and tissues we want to address specifically. nevertheless, technological development in that direction is ongoing. we are also developing the ability to modify cells that can be introduced into the body with new genetics and designed molecular biochemistry or to modify and edit embryos prior to their implantation. we are learning to genetically modify a pig embryo to produce human compatible organs for transplantation, or 3d print organs. we can change our body composition, but we may also decide to edit ourselves from the very start. in terms of editing human embryos directly, we as a society need to determine how we want to use this technology; there are clearly many opportunities for improving health and wellness, and some large dangers as well. one of the more promising avenues is to capture human knowledge in biomedicine, reconcile inconsistencies automatically, and be able to simulate at the molecular level every pathway and all omics in the body computationally. this could lead to true understanding of normal and deviations from normal, the usual definition of disease. drugs and their effects on a particular person could be modeled and dosages calculated. the possibilities for human or animal biology management are exciting though impossible to specifically predict if we develop this capability. social networking social networking has changed our access and rate in which we access communication and how we collaborate. it has spurred new ideas and influenced the way we think about democracy. it has democratized information in a way that enhances education and new ideas. twitter, as an example, has changed how we get news. it has influenced the end of regimes, and depending on the point of view, has had a positive or negative effect on politics. social networking is a powerful tool that has allowed people to have a voice and connect globally. and it’s not all just cat pictures and status updates. slack has brought social networking to industries and enterprises. it enabled more voices to collaborate and be heard, and helped making processes and businesses more efficient. like anything powerful, social networks can have negative and positive implications on the world. they are undoubtedly a powerful tool to both spur innovative ideas and, influence them to get traction. they allow us to aggregate opinion, to get feedback for product designs and product reviews, and to have new channels of democracy (and it’s subterfuge, as well as fake news). scientific social networks accelerate communication and collaboration and increase the rate of progress or discussion. there are many ways in which industrial progress is leveraging these social tools. this tool is speeding the pace of change and innovation across key areas like education, health, and government. ai systems added to social networks and messaging will change them materially again. i am continuously optimistic this will be for the better. blockchain a marriage of the internet and cryptography created the blockchain which has given rise to the distributed ledger, new payment systems, and cryptocurrencies like bitcoin. this will be critical axes of innovation that will enable new businesses and paradigms, whether it be smart contracts to rethinking workflows, food traceability, medical records, and other mission critical data tools. blockchain will be a new way to use technology to rethink complete industries like the financial system or being full transparency and tracing into supply chains. when haiti was hit by the hurricane, many or most of the records were lost. this could have been easily avoided. blockchain could allow people, businesses, and governments to rethink how they are storing and using their data, such as documents, information, payments. keep in mind there are dangers of misuse, volatility, diversion into fraud and illicit use as dangers. old tools that still have impact… the “older technologies will continue to be axes of innovation that continue to have impact and provide benefit include (but are not limited to):software computing and cloud computing internet sensors and cameras mobile biology, chemistry, and physics tools the way i think about it is the greater the number of axes (dimensions in which innovation is possible) and the better the tools for innovation, experimentation, and lower the cost of trials for ideas, the faster the rate of chance and the more possibility of a surprise like amazon or tesla or google or instagram or paypal or uber. combinations of technology can be exponential and autocatalytic by accelerating each other. it’s hard to forecast, but somewhat easier to speculate what might be new tools for the next decade. again though, the best reinvention is seemingly unimaginable. all the “known” axes today form a soup which catalyzes many new ideas and reactions. add the potential for new types of computing like quantum or ai hardware, which might accelerate computation and ai even beyond our imagination today, are truly unpredictable. new axes will surely happen, perhaps with sophisticated broad quantum computing, fusion energy, or molecular assembly. computation remains a fundamentally underutilized resource in physics, chemistry, biology, simulations, materials, and much more in society. 7. reinventing transportation key drivers: driverless technology, electric cars, reimagined public transportation, batteries, dedicated self driving public transit lanes, mobile hailing and scheduling solutions. transportation trends: from public transportation to flying cars… it can all be reinvented. when you take the cost structure of an uber, multiply its usage by 5 10x in any given city, assume cars that are used 100,000 200,000 miles per year (amortized as a few cents per passenger mile serviced over its million mile designed life) instead of 12,000 and as a result operating costs become much more important than capital costs. thus, electric cars become much more cost effective. interest and maintenance costs decline because of scale and the cost of the driver disappears because of driverless technology. at the moment, the driver is the largest part of a uber or taxi service and would approach a few cents per passenger mile., scheduling, hailing, and other operations are automated through intelligent ai and mobile devices. it becomes hard to see how owning a car makes sense except for a small fraction of the population. for instance, we could have public transportation in smart cities, enabled by clever legislation, point to point on demand, that is cheaper than today’s fixed route, fixed schedule transit services run by most cities enabled by electric cars/pods and driverless technology. a little pod that seldom crashes, with streets dedicated to it should not cost more than a dollar a ride. batteries and electricity would be the main cost per passenger mile. these pods, given the service time, will need to be electric, which incidentally lowers carbon per passenger mile for cities that are carbon sensitive about their electric supply. it also means higher reliability because of fewer moving parts. because these pods will be be less prone to crashing, they will be lighter and cheaper, which will allow them to go much further on a kilowatt hour of electricity, reducing battery costs. a light bicycle is 17 pounds. would a four passenger pod that can be frequently recharged need more than a few hundred pounds to carry 1,000 pounds of four people? electricity cost would be very small at 50 100 pounds of vehicle weight per person for each mile. one could summon specialty pods for wheelchairs or other specialty loads. for forward looking cities, we may see these as anywhere to anywhere on demand public transportation for a few dollars or maybe near free! the ubers of the world and the volkswagen’s of the world may be marginalized. cars will remain a thing for car enthusiasts. however, besides special use cases for the vast percentage of passenger miles cars, trains and public transportation will be reinvented. all that dramatically reduces cost for cities and citizens. and then there will be flying taxis. so, lots of tools allowing for innovation and transportation and its implications for cities. just as cars changed cities, electric and driverless technology could change them again, especially if applied to public transportation. parking lots and spaces could be replaced by parks or housing, or commuter lanes. commute distances may expand, housing may get cheaper, and environmental pollution decline. driverless car technology may kill the combustion engine and set the oil industry in permanent decline. cities could be redesigned to work differently, especially if one adds in improved communications technology. the number of cars could decline five fold or more. the need for natural resources like steel, rubber and plastics decline concomitantly. parking lots and spaces could be replaced by parks or housing, commuter lanes by driverless lanes or streets, commute distances may expand, housing may get cheaper and environmental pollution decline. one may need to accommodate new factors such as pickup and dropoff spots on streets. driverless car technology may kill the combustion engine and set the oil industry in permanent decline. cities could be redesigned to work differently, especially if one adds communications technology and space efficiency and reuse paradigms. and the number of cars could decline by 5x or more and the need to natural resources like steel, rubber and plastics decline concomitantly. automobiles as a large part of gdp could change dramatically. even trains could become autonomous pods on roads or tracks, dispatched on demand, instead of being enormous beasts carrying 100,000 pound cabins (that go empty much of the day) that only make economic and climate sense when fully loaded and whose schedule is limited by when they can carry a breakeven number of passengers. a key metric might be average pounds and costs of material required to carry a human. ideally, we start with key arteries. let’s take the airport to the strip section of las vegas and reimagine it as a driverless only free service. then, let the service spread spread organically from there, with more reserved streets to offer anywhere to anywhere public transportation on demand which could be cheaper than today’s transit tickets and more economical for the city. more and more of the city streets might become driverless and public utility only, much like today’s “reserved lanes” in a city like san francisco. cities will have increasing incentive to make more of the publicly paid for streets driverless only for public “transport pods” only. if residents of a city get closer to their destination, they might even walk the last half mile, which could have beneficial influence on their health. incidentally, with the increasing number of driverless pods, the “reach of the city” or distance possible within a certain fixed commute time will increase. thus, it can ease housing shortages and improve housing affordability. parking land would be freed up for parks and low cost housing. the city without automobiles would be a different animal. to understand what drives cities check out a physicist solves the city! the city without automobiles (mostly in most but not all places) would be a different animal. with 80% fewer resources we could have dramatically more transport capacity, speed, and convenience. the pattern of adoption is not yet clear. the rate of adoption will depend upon how the technology is targeted at social solutions. it might happen first on elder care communities, with free taxi service to avoid the disadvantages of having average age 70 drivers and enable everyone in age restricted communities to have more freedom. on the other hand, it may be an incentive to make affordable housing more prevalent by guaranteeing a certain commute time with free service in dedicated lanes from certain communities to work centers? or it may be used in order to relieve traffic congestion in cities like inner london; offering near point to point convenient and affordable service can render private transportation unnecessary. another likely development is to relieve truck drivers of tedious jobs by letting driverless trucks ply the freeways and the drivers to take over when off the freeway initially? adoption and social acceptance in my view will have a huge path dependence and a range of adoption options are available. possibility 2050: driverless automotive technology will be pervasive. public transit might replace cars as we know them in small pods instead of large buses and will be unscheduled and point to point, on demand. certain streets will be dedicated to autonomous public transit pods only. larger distance travel will also be autonomous, possibly on “tracks” (evolution of today’s trains but with small “rail pods” instead of large trains); autonomous driving, except in special circumstances, will drive us towards smaller “pods” of less than 200 pounds of vehicle (think grown up “weather protective” scooters or golf carts that seldom crash) per passenger rather than today’s 2000 pounds of steel per passenger. these will be augmented by flying autonomous taxis changing our notion of commute distances and navigable terrain/roads/rivers/mountain passes/bays. trucks on freeways will be completely autonomous and autonomous vehicles will dominate local transport too and become much more diverse in size and configurations from sidewalk or bike lane delivery robots to small local delivery vehicles to larger freeway vehicles. the focus will be on throughput per lane for each modality of transportation and safety. and just maybe, if we are optimistic, we will have shanghai to san francisco in a 30 minutes rocket flight. transportation 2025: early driverless robo taxi services and trucks on many routes, often the simpler and easier to map ones, and possibly flying electric planes. electric and driverless technology maturing for cars, trucks, trains, planes, helicopters and more, driving major shifts in economics and land use patterns and transportation resource consumption from steel to oil to roads. even though “market penetration” may only be a few percent in each category, the inexorable trends will be evident and on a rapidly improving and iterating path. freeways will be routinely plied by autonomous trucks but city driving will be largely human drivers. flying cars may be common personal curiosities with small penetration. electric transport airplanes will be starting to enter service. 8. reinventing health, disease diagnosis and management, drug discovery key drivers: artificial intelligence for comprehensive understanding of medical knowledge, new measurement techniques enabled by and for machines allowing for 1000x or more data for algorithms to use, new algorithms to discover new knowledge in medicine, new tools for imaging the body and biomarker data acquisition from blood to physiologic (ecg, hrv, bp etc) to phenotypic biomarkers (wearables, voice, etc), better research based on more data, more , better drug discovery using ai, and ai guided robotic surgery. and eventually, much more causal models of disease and computational models of the human system. healthcare trends: is it likely that technology could multiply doctors including many, if not most, specialties many fold? perhaps it could even, invent a better doctor, making them always available everywhere, accessible, and affordable or near free like google search? a personal, broadly knowledgeable ai doctor for all 7 billion people on this planet is possible, even likely. maybe people should only provide the human element of medical care? there are probably a million doctors in the united states, give or take, but with ai systems, we could create ten or a few hundred million doctors worth of expertise and use human doctors only for what they love to do, which is interfacing with patients, making health more personal, accessible, convenient, and less costly. we imagine an idealized doctor today but the reality of medicine today is very different. doctors have a few minutes per patient visit for the top half of the planet’s population and little to none for everyone else. in the future, almost certainly data science and ai will provide much better diagnosis, monitoring, and follow up than most human doctors, as per my paper in 2016. it will do much better prescription, whether prescribing a drug or a procedure. we will have real science behind medicine. doctors today learn mostly from constantly improving iterative practice and that has resulted in better medicine than we have ever had before. but it could be substantially better with rapid acceleration in quality as we move from the practice of medicine to the science of medicine. every ai agent will be updated with the latest research and up to date with every specialty, instead of being knowledgeable in just their own vertical specialty. that will allow for a holistic approach to treating patients because of integrative knowledge, as opposed to the current separating of the specialists, like patient’s cardiologist from their orthopedist or endocrinologist. ai will do much better diagnosis, monitoring, and follow up than most human doctors and complement the human element of care humans might provide. medicine is much better than it has ever been, so we have to acknowledge every aspect of medicine has improved over the last ten years, thirty years, hundred years. that, however, does not mean it cannot be even better. at the moment, the “iteration of practice” has done a good job to improve medicine; when ai does medicine, it will be so much better. ai will enable less errors in doctor diagnosis and surgery, better drug discovery, and personalized prescriptions. care will be based on thousands of biomarkers, genes, transcriptome, proteome, sometimes called “all omics medicine”. we will be able to measure many more variables (thousands or millions per sample/patient/time point or more) and make decisions based on complexity no human doctor could master. it will be possible to even specify dosage for drugs for each patient’s current state and monitor disease progression as well as side effects at the molecular level. it seems silly there is one dosage prescription for aspirin or opioids for seven billion people on the planet. drug discovery and surgery will change primarily to computational techniques, opening up more possibilities. procedures like surgery and anesthesia could get roboticized, either with a human assisting robot or the other way around. should you have bypass surgery or a stent? most of that medicine is based on debatable evidence. according to the american heart association, there is class a evidence for only about 11 percent of their cardiac related recommendations, meaning evidence from multiple randomized trials or meta analyses exists to support the diagnosis. whereas 45 percent are based on recommendations founded on expert opinion (level c evidence, the worst kind). and great quality will only be possible to achieve because of very low marginal costs, as has happened in so many other computationally based services. better and faster patient outcomes, lesser healthcare costs, and more accessibility to all people are most likely to happen simultaneously. technology has generally increased healthcare costs, but hopefully, it will be different this time as marginal cost will be much lower, as opposed to those of proton beam accelerators. much has been discussed about precision medicine. unfortunately, however, it is mostly focused on genomic data. that is mostly tunnel vision; a much more promising “all omics” medicine has the potential to use your genome, your microbiome, your blood transcriptome, proteome, metabolome, exposome and generally “all omics” as well as custom computational models of each human body to precisely characterize the state of each human body and body subsystem. network medicine will treat all the metabolic pathways in the body simultaneously as a connected network system, not as individual pathways. such approach would be more personalized than precision medicine. i suspect most diseases will be defined and diagnosed this way, with broad terms like “diabetes” becoming obsolete and patients being classified by the molecular pathways, causing the high blood sugar “symptom” to become obsolete just as the term “dropsy” has, thus marginalizing symptom based medicine. one of the fundamental limitations in medical practice has been the propensity to collect data that people can interpret. what is promising to me is the number of fundamental technologies being attempted to collect large ai scale data from everything, from an mri image to a blood sample to the lowly ecg. if one had 30,000 biomarkers from every drop of blood for the same cost as today’s blood test and diabetes was defined and differentiated based on patterns of these markers, one would be able to predict which diabetic was at risk of cardiac disease and which of diabetic neuropathy. all this would be much better for the patient. imaging is also ripe for reinvention, using computational capabilities and consumerized components. much more is possible than we settle for today, in x rays, ultrasound, mri, ct scans, fmri and more, with reimagined imaging with new math and physics offering more detail, faster at higher resolution and lower cost and increased accessibility. looking into the body should be routine, radiation free and inexpensive. in my view, very little about medicine needs to stay the same. we have to get away from the idea that we use symptoms to diagnose disease. data science should diagnose disease and monitor progress or recommended dosage of a medication and therapy to best treatment. we should get away from the notion of one prescription for all seven billion people on the planet based mostly on their weight. as i described on quora last year, one should take a million people, measure hundreds, if not thousands of variables, their blood and their microbiome and their physiology, every week, for a year. that way we’d have fifty million data points, each data point being thousands of data points in itself. such a data set could predict most diseases, diagnose most diseases, and do it early   when it is truly beginning, not when it becomes symptomatic. this can not only contribute to preventive health. it can and will combat diseases and cancer by very early diagnosis. plus, layer this into gene editing techniques and microbiome research. there is much to be done around personalization and targeted medicine. that’s the startup i would do and get excited about doing. we have already seen entrepreneurs working on it in bits and pieces. while it’s very complex and cannot be done in one step today, we will get there in the end. as i only half jokingly told the stanford medical school audience about it three years ago: “if i wanted to be a really good doctor in fifteen years, i would not go to the med school, i’d go to the math department.” here are the facts: if you give a doctor five thousand data points, they wouldn’t know how to diagnose you. if you give a system five thousand data points, it can do really good diagnosis, and if you do fifty thousand more, it’d be better. we can get enough information to recommend whether you really, are at high risk and should get a colonoscopy this analysis will get better and, eventually lead to generalized early cancer detection. disease will be detected early. right now, most people with heart disease learn about their disease from a heart attack, not twenty years earlier when it started. when this is no longer the norm, we will move closer to healthcare from the sickcare we have today. we should have real science behind medicine. medicine is much better than it has ever been, so we have to acknowledge every aspect of medicine has improved over the last ten, thirty or hundred years. but that doesn’t mean it’s as good as it can be. the people who object to this, don’t realize that at least three billion of the seven billion people on this planet have never seen a doctor, don’t have access to one, or cannot afford one. they definitely couldn’t afford the drugs that pharma companies have been putting out recently. it is criminal that they cannot, especially if medication exists. possibility 2050: every consumer will be the ceo of his own health informed mostly by ai. not subject to the whims or availability or opinions of a doctor. we will go from the practice of medicine to the science of medicine with the ability to see how every personal parameter, among hundreds, is affected as one administers a drug or procedure. we mostly eliminate the notion of symptom based medicine or symptom based diagnosis with predictive capability dramatically predicting most disease onsets days, weeks, months and even years in advance. imagine near free physicians for everybody (nursing specialties will still cost money and back offices which account for a lot of healthcare personnel will be dramatically reduced). every person on the planet will have access to a 24/7 personal ai “near free” physician which is also an integrative “all specialty” physician. all seven billion people on the planet may have this personal ai “primary care” or “all care” doctor when they need it, a personal psychiatrist, a personal oncologist, a personal cardiologist and more for about the cost of google search. we will treat patients holistically because of integrative knowledge and not separate their cardiologist from their orthopedist or endocrinologist. the annual physical will be dramatically more quantitative and predictive of future health without costing more. routine (even checkup) blood and other tests will massively multiplex data (10,000 or more biomarkers periodically at costs below that of a simple blood draw). imaging will be much higher resolution, more functional and detailed compared to today, liely with full there 3d dynamic/functional models of hearts and brains. full body ten minute scans and functional characterizations (like arterial flow rates, perfusion rates, or fmri ) will be routine. fine grained mental health treatments will be based on hundreds of quantitative biomarkers not the current dsm 5 manual for psychiatrists. disease progression measurement for diseases like alzheimer’s will be quantitative. drugs, including narrowly specific biologics will be personalized. humans will have fully computational models to predict the affects of interventions like drugs and personalized testing options like organoid systems before serious interventions for in vitro testing in addition to in silico systems. network medicine using interactions among large number of biomarkers and pathways simultaneously will be dominant with models with hundreds or thousands of parameters. disease will be detected early (it’s a shame that most people with heart disease learn about their disease from a heart attack, not twenty years earlier when it started) and we will move closer to healthcare from the sickcare we have today. data and ai technology intensive healthcare could be a lot cheaper, accessible and better. and just as a library research project is as cheap and more comprehensive generally through a google search, medicine will follow similar cost and quality curves (though healthcare incumbents, from hospitals to the ama will still be fighting this better, lower cost care with fud and scare tactics). healthcare 2025: we will start to do short to medium term prediction of disease, disease prognosis, dosing, prescription and new forms of imaging. ai will be preeminent in its features though not deeply penetrated. diagnostics will include all omics but in a physician assisted way but the amount and cycle of testing for everything from blood biomarkers will be based on larger scale multiplexed techniques and will be more immediate and much lower cost. human physicians will be bionically assisted by ai systems but will be primary caregivers, diagnosticians, prescribers. consumers will, when they are so desirous, will be much better informed by ai systems. microbiomes and foods will become start to be important in everyday physician prescriptions with both recognized by the mainstream medical world as important “drugs” and curatives. new techniques from ai and robotics will dramatically improve drug discovery, drug targeting to personal omics and even dosing. the number of gene specific biological drugs like anti sense oligos will start to accelerate and small molecule drugs will significantly improve their approval rate. new biomarkers like hrv, vagal tone, eeg and ecg sub features, detailed ultrasounds will augment traditional less precise markers like blood pressure, heart rate, ecg, temperature and physical exams. genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolics will enter traditional medical practice. 9. reinventing manufacturing, construction, buildings, building efficiency and cities key drivers: automated construction using manufacturing techniques, 3d printing, new materials, robotic delivery, “transformer” type spaces, shared and higher percentage reusage, 3d printing of buildings and furniture, social networking and increase in community spaces and relationships. buildings are a big part of our urban landscape and a large consumer of resources. construction and building account for more carbon emissions in the us than transportation or industry. led lighting is enabling 80 percent less electricity use, although unfortunately efficiency in light generation goes hand in with the increase its use. possibility 2050: buildings are a key part of our urban landscape and a large consumer of resources and given their lifetimes, they will overtly look similar. but techniques ofr new building construction will change dramatically. housing will be dematerialized and manufacturing techniques including partial 3d printing and lessons from automotive will be applied universally to construction. what if space was reconfigurable and we would need half only as much to live comfortably? some startups are building cost effective “transformer furniture” systems powered by modular robotics, so that they can seamlessly adapt space to activities and can be installed in a true plug and play fashion. affordability and availability would go up and land use would decline for housing of large numbers of people. space would become more cost effective, and developers would be able to adopt their buildings retroactively. buildings purpose built for wework like uses and reconfigurable could add additional virtual space. and new community spaces through reuse may change the equation further. further imagine buildings were manufactured like automobiles, reducing costs dramatically. possibly, next generation buildings would be 3d printed in concrete or other materials and maybe steel or carbon fiber reinforced and designed with ai. for example, using generative design, they could possibly weigh a 50 80% less with much better insulation and use fewer quantity of materials. structural elements like beams could use far less steel or could be 3d printed with composites. for instance, 3d printed carbon fiber beams can be five times stronger than titanium, and when 3d manufactured with no human labor, more cost effective. all unnecessary material unneeded for structure could be subtracted with ai design and 3d printed. and what if shared office spaces could turn into residences or hotels at night or be “weworked?” could we accommodate twice as many people twice as affordability in the same city? of course, we won’t take down buildings or rebuild a whole city immediately. yet, all those freed up parking spaces and new construction would be an opportunity to transform the city gradually over the course of two to five decades. a very large percentage of buildings are non compliant with current code; the combination of forced compliance and upside economic opportunity with much more cost effective space may motivate developers. one can imagine delivery robots reducing chores as well as traffic using sidewalks. or virtual clinic visits reducing medical visits. the complex ecosystem is hard to predict but will offer many opportunities. robotic kitchens for burgers and delivery robots for home delivery would reduce the need for restaurant space. here, i’m sticking with more linear ideas that might motivate an entrepreneur to pursue the change by themselves and build the next google or tesla. manufacturing, starting from cars to furniture and other durable goods, could also use techniques dreamed about above. construction would put them on a different cost trajectory than in the past, and could potentially end up messing up our gdp numbers as much as computing has! they could be printed locally on demand when possible (from walls to sofas) and minimally assembled locally; this might not be feasible for automobiles, but easier for furniture. autos would have different material consumption curves because of these techniques and others, like autonomous driving, would eliminate most accidents and hence reduce the need for bulk and crash protection! add new battery technologies that cut weight in half and accelerate the decline of the internal combustion engine and its pollution. 3d printed composite structure could mean crashproof automobiles. public transportation in small pods travelling 10x more miles per year than today’s automobile on average will put pundits prognostications about our transportation needs to smithereens over a few decades. in general trends towards dematerialization of things will have accelerated. cities and urban living can be hundreds of percentages more efficient, sustainable, and with dramatically less costs and more community. imagine a city world where we need less restaurant space because of robotic kitchens, robotic food delivery, self picking mini grocery store warehouses for instacart like ordering with robotic delivery, virtual entertainment and get togethers, more parks for being outdoors that substitute for parking lots, or houses that multiply space because of airbnb like models to reduce need for hotel rooms and increase space efficiency. wework like space efficient buildings that are further reused for homeless housing or hotels in the evenings with transforming furniture? new housing could half the space because of robotic transforming furniture improving space efficiency. our assumptions about space, cities, density, efficiency, transportation, parks could change in unpredictable ways. this is a far cry from the 5 10% building efficiency environmentalists talk about and it will involve very little sacrifice of convenience. what might manufacturing look like in 2050? dematerialized, efficient, just in time, very local. little inventory, no long supply chains, nothing made in china taking 3 months to ship   you get the idea. the nature of a car or shirt or furniture may or may not change but need for cars will and how shirts are made will change. blockchain based supply chains will transform our efficiency. a kuka robot arm shouldn’t weigh 3 tons and could be replaced by smarter arms used for broader scale manufacturing and 3d printing. more technologies could invert the supply chain to more local, product cycles and costs in unpredictable ways. customized, dematerialized composites or metals 3d printed in generative design derivatives may make manufacturing a different world with very different tradeoffs of cost, complexity of design, supply chain, materials, inventory, and customer preferences including retailing. and all this would apply to many if not most parts of our consumption from buildings and houses to transportation to appliances. materials choices for building things will be numerous. manufacturing and construction 2025: housing will be start to be dematerialized and manufacturing techniques including partial 3d printing and lessons from automotive will be applied to construction. space will start to be reused or used more efficiently with robotics. every restaurant in san francisco is underutilized during certain times of the day. that shouldn’t be the case. wework and airbnb are starting to address space efficiency and that may become more of the norm for many use cases. making a 500 square foot apartment behave like a 1,000 square foot apartment through robotic transformation of furniture. because the furniture moves and transforms, the bed goes in and out. you don’t need 3 feet in front of your closet when you’re not using your closet. all this kind of space efficiency. robotics companies are reducing or eliminating kitchens in restaurants. robotic deliveries. rethinking how construction has to be done and the start of ai software driven design, planning, scheduling and building of construction. we will have ai robotics driven assembly lines with ease of configurability replacing lines in china locally with the intelligence and dexterity to replace much of human capability be it assembling an iphone or selecting eggs by size. we don’t need humans doing mind numbing robotic jobs. 3d printed composites or metals based consumer goods and industrial goods will be common from shoes to bicycles and maybe even some houses. your normal wrench will have much less material in it and complexity in furniture may be near free. new materials will proliferate. the supply chain from the far east to the west will start to invert for specialty items from small volume manufacturing to shoes to clothes and furniture, though the east will start to create new local demand that will be locally filled. 10. reinventing food and agriculture key drivers: robotics, machine vision and ai, plant by plant care eliminating much of herbicides and insecticides, meat alternatives, sensory technologies to pack sensation with nutrition, better land use, drone and satellite imaging, better seed and chemical technologies, microorganisms, precision agriculture, fermentation & synthesis technologies, indoor farming, dense farming, microorganisms. whether any of the current “meat equivalent” food production companies changes the world or not, in order to get past the ills of animal husbandry and return our planet and land to its healthy, diverse ecosystem, something like impossible foods is necessary to match the taste of red meat. whether it becomes a huge googlesque impact, a role model, or a footnote in history, it proved the possibility of food reinvention. multiple entities working on reducing the impact of meat production, consuming a very large part of the planet’s usable land mass and a humongous percentage of freshwater use on the planet. it takes 1,800 gallons of water to produce a pound of beef. growing the amount of feed grains necessary for just raising livestock accounts for 56 percent of the u.s water consumption. similar efforts are underway in dairy alternatives. it is possible to reduce the land required for animal husbandry by 50 percent or more, despite the increasing demand. new sensory tools are being developed. traditional agriculture companies developing robotic technologies are dramatically reducing the need for herbicides and eventually other chemicals. even plant by plant care, dosing of fertilizer or herbicide or insecticide in a million plant field is entirely feasible with robotic technologies. this can lead to higher yield, lower inputs, and lower environmental damage. why spray herbicides on the whole field when one can weed mechanically, and, perchance, eliminate herbicides all together? perhaps we can using robotic mechanical weeding to mostly eliminate herbicides in agriculture and get rid of the hated roundup and dramatically reduce insecticide use? maybe we can even allow gmo plants that are generally good for society but much maligned because of the negative impact that glycophosphates (roundup) has on environments and gmo plants are most closely associated with roundup ready plants, can be freed from it. eventually, these technologies will allow for plant by plant care even in a field of millions of plants. they will allow for far less nitrogen use, more yield per plant, less chemicals, and far less land use. any technology that can reduce land use is very valuable given the amount of land is fixed on this planet, and we need to reforest millions of acres to find the easiest path to pulling carbon out of the air. over a hundred out of the 116 models in the ipcc carbon reduction scenarios involve using some technology like reforestation to pull carbon out of the air). it is encouraging that area under farmland worldwide is finally declining and there is potential for the decline to accelerate. possibility 2050: there could be be far less land use for farming, far less chemicals, and far less factory farming of animals. many drugs will be replaced by “medical foods” and food may become among the more important pharmaceuticals. precision agriculture also implies the use of such technologies as data science, aerial imaging, early disease detection. further development of ai for imaging and data analysis, more easily and frequently accessed satellites, bio techniques like increased microbial communities, all aided by the use of fewer chemicals that would traditionally sterilize the soil because of new roboticized weeding and insect targeting will dramatically reduce the impact of and land use for agriculture. and it might even be that for specialized crops, vertical farms and data science lead to yield maximization coupled with robotic labor make a real change in the yield or resource or acres used. of course, driverless tractors, drones, satellites, driverless trucks and sidewalk delivery robots to take care of the deliveries may change resource needs broadly. another dimension of innovation is the creation of new foods, such as beef without cows, milk from plants, eggs without chickens, all far less environmentally harmful at that. for example, 30 50% of our planet’s land is dedicated to animal husbandry. impossible uses 90 97% less land and 70% less water   being both good for the environment and people’s health. this new foods will not only shift food production processes, be healthier for end consumers, but reduce environmental issues with very dramatic changes to land use for agriculture. replacing animal husbandry may become one of the better tools for mitigating climate change and animal husbandry cruelty. our factory food system with its many benefits and ills is due for massive disruption which will be substantially in progress by 2050. 2025: there’s so many axes of innovation in food. i used to think food isn’t open to innovation but when i looked the possibilities surprised me. every area i looked into was open. even hamburgers was open into innovation and it was clear we could use far less land, water fertilizer, chemicals, animal husbandry. the impossible burger is an example. this is how we go from 10% of the world’s population to the 100% being fed well and healthier. and of course, my favorite, 80% less cruelty to animals. eggs and dairy are being reinvented. blue river, which john deere acquired, used ai to do mechanically robotic weeding so you don’t have to use chemical herbicides. you can do plant by plant fertilizer dosing in a million plant field because it’s robotic. far less fertilizer, far less insecticide, herbicide. vertical farming and indoor farming will start to establish itself as a material force from what is a curiosity today. food production systems worldwide change slowly so trends visible in 2025 will likely take much longer to achieve material penetration of the ecosystem. 11. reinventing financial, insurance and legal services key drivers: ai technology to replace people functions and judgement (biases and cost), blockchain, mobility, data, software automation, secure reliable software services. the pundit economists/goldman sachs/jp morgan/citibank view of financial systems and economics we are used to is being significantly challenged. even basics like gdp as the right measure is being questioned. entrepreneurs keep getting outraged that financial services, which should just be a service to real products and services being produced, are taking up such a large share of profits of all industry. it is possible to reinvent most of these services and especially those that rely on human labor or intermediaries. though companies like square, stripe and affirm are changing things for consumers and small businesses by disrupting incumbents, much more can be done and will likely happen. others are creating radical new business models, like even, hourly employee payment insurance, the bank app that plans so customers do not have to. financial institutions impose massive taxes on fundraising organised by different industries. those should diminish by order of magnitude based just on cost of providing this service and shared crowdsourced research. research analysts provide valuable services in capital formation, but the costs are multiplied and much of capital formation is mispriced. the tax reduction should also apply to consumer banking and financial services costs. it could be that blockchain based services and software contracts in finance and insurance, which could dislodge centralized control or “financial tax”. it could have identity verification, as well as traditional fraud and illegal activity controls like aml, kyc added on to the blockchain. it could be simpler disintermediation of everything from foreign exchange to lending and insurance services. insurance could be based on real costs, better actuarial tables, regulation around what is or is not legal to differentiate on, and low overhead. it is likely that legal services are automated by ai; there are only about seven million cases in us legal history. they are more structured and seem easier to computerize based on federal and state laws that these cases interpret than a technology like google home or amazon alexa which cover a far less structured and much broader range of conversational topics. computerizing law and lawyers with or without software contracts will enable every citizen to have a personal lawyer(s)at a low cost or no cost at all? a few hundred thousand dollars a year of legal and medical services will cost almost nothing. it is possible that ai will replace many of the supposed value added functions, as it has already been proven in stock trading and financial planning. judgement and estimation tasks in this data rich segment should be algorithmically driven and ai will likely replace human judgement where there is enough transaction volume (read volume, margins, profits), and much of the back office work done by humans can be replaced by ai. one firm has already appointed an ai as a board member. what is clear is the ten percent of all financial transactions (a wild guestimate) actually add value to society. industry can be done at a fraction of the cost with less overhead or transaction taxes, and it can be done more fairly by more objective algorithms. the rest is speculation and circular trading worth trillions of dollars daily! this will add a lot more transparency, although it may introduce other problems. financial, insurance, and legal services will be freed of capitalistic lock in and open to much more competition from relatively more transparent players; this could translate into far more affordable and accessible services. for instance, in jordan, refugees are able to pay for food with blockchain technology, which is faster, cheaper, and more secure. blockchain enables and creates trust, reduces risk, opens up banking to those who might not have bank accounts. in traditional banking, there are middlebank and inefficiencies in the more formal system that exists today, whereas with blockchain that’s not the case, thus breaking socioeconomic challenges. another example, is making access to legal services more affordable through ai, essentially replacing the lawyer. whether for contract law, ip, or personal law, most if not all the work will be done through technology. possibility 2050: human mediation of financial, legal and insurance services will be relatively small compared to higher quality services offered by ai systems. wealth advice, legal advice, insurance, lending, fraud, trust will be ai driven worlds to a large degree. the nature of services and needs is almost impossible to predict. some form of universal basic income will likely be a more broadly accepted concept though at a lower level than needed to provide full income support for recipients. the nature of the “firm” will be different but hard to say how. the nature of “work’ will trend towards jobs people want to do and not what they have to do. whether the speculation and circular trading worth trillions of dollars daily that will be minimized to the bare essentials is harder to say! many if not most aspects of finance can be replaced with technology that make financial services more affordable and accessible. by 2025: the basic functions of banking, lending, borrowing, investing, capital formation, insurance, mortgages and legal can be done much better, more fairly, cheaper with less overhead and broader accessibility. all the people with fancy wealth advisors will do far worse than somebody who just relies on ai at very little cost. credit should be pervasive, easier and not mediated by humans. algorithms will be biased but we will identify how to detect these biases and often correct for them. in any case algorithms will be much less biased than the current state of affairs with humans making judgements. mortgages and supply chains may start to take advantage of blockchain and likely the cost of centralized agents (like banks or bankers) will be substantially reduced because of competition from distributed trust systems. the financial tax of intermediaries will start to be minimal in most routine transactions and ai’s may construct many unique transactions and services. the same will happen in financial services whether it’s insurance or loans or access to investment opportunities. they will be dematerialized with few humans needed. lots of new axes of innovation and data will allow for much more lower cost insurance from salary insurance for hourly employees to helping small business do what larger businesses do with ai based systems at low cost. so many new services will appear that suddenly don’t need big banks or big financial institutions. we will start to remake most consumer and business financial and insurance services and put pressure on larger institutions to adopt or get left behind. risk bearing assets will have more direct access to markets with fewer intermediaries. 12. reinventing energy services key drivers: scientific talent and long view funding. the best minds getting phds are not going into energy or cleantech today, which poses a fundamental problem. entrepreneurs realize it is hard to get funding, and for that reason, we are not seeing as many startups as we’d like to see. and energy services need technology as a driver to make environmentally great energy services market competitive. cleantech is very capital intensive and although there was a period of too much exuberance in the area, now it is met with investor disinterest. while it will slow down innovation long term, hopefully, it won’t stop it altogether. organizations like breakthrough energy ventures are trying to address this. there are a number of audacious fusion projects and equally unlikely geothermal energy projects where linear cost for deeper drilling instead of exponential cost per foot when drilling at depth is the key breakthrough needed, storage, new materials and manufacturing, building materials, new agriculture and food. it is possible but the going has been slow.. this is the hardest area in which to visualize breakthrough step impact progress. i am still hopeful and feel that many high risk projects with high probability of failure must be attempted. though 5 10 20 percent improvements are still fundable, 500 1000 percent change innovations are less clear to me. there are many areas in which it must be attempted: from fusion to geothermal to storage to new materials and new agriculture and food. food is the easiest area to see radical resource efficiency. that is likely the way to providing seven billion people a rich lifestyle as defined earlier without destroying the planet, depleting its resources (can we produce 10x the steel, copper, glass, cement, or use 10x less of each), and irreversible climate change. low carbon/low cost power is a major need and achieve extremely hard to find solution to. nevertheless, a much worse option from trying and failing will be failing to try. i have personally failed at trying to do this and had only limited success. others like tesla and waymo/google serve as role models and are changing the transportation industry forever. additionally, ai may help accelerate progress in energy, and with quantum computers help with design, and exploration like at least fusion reactor containment structure, or find a solution for dark matter physics. perhaps, it could help in designing more energy efficient buildings or design cities that align more with structures in nature (highly recommend reading scale by geoffrey west. one of the largest inefficiencies in energy, is when it comes to agriculture. the production process is wildly broken. the alliance for water efficiency estimates that $13 15b boost to the u.s. economy could be possible through more water and energy efficiency efforts, in general. with technology and innovation, water can be better conserved and utilized across the full agricultural process   whether it is in irrigation, crop yield, or distribution. satellite advancements, robotics in fields, vertical farming, soil sensors, analytics using ai (for things like weather information or when and how to take actions or utilize water will increase efficiencies. i am hopeful that a few breakthroughs, with fusion and geothermal (where linear cost for deeper drilling instead of exponential cost per foot when drilling at depth is the key breakthrough needed) being my best candidates, will help us over the next few decades. a caution is in order. most attempts in energy look for 10 20 30% improvements in energy r resource efficiency. we need 100 500 1000% improvements in energy, water, land use, minerals and mining and in general everything that uses physical resources. buildings have to for example use 80% less materials by weight and water efficiency of meat and ag production has to improve by similar amounts. this is hard. having said that the decline of oil as an energy source in transportation has clearly started and will be even more firmly a trend by 2025. the path to clean nuclear like fusion energy will take luck and persistence for stationary energy services. alternatives will be egs geothermal or large scale energy storage by 2050 to complement intermittent sources like solar and wind. 13. reinventing consumer services from retailing, entertainment to elder care to delivery key drivers: mobile, ai, internet, communications, social networking, voice and image technology, sensor and cameras, data, mass personalized manufacturing. the way we shop and consume products and services has started to change over the last decade. the decline of traditional brick and mortar companies is clear but this does not necessarily point to the downfall of brick and mortar itself. technology is changing the way we discover products (pinterest), how we order them (instacart), how we make purchases (apple pay or square), and how we find what’s right for us. the supply chain is being reinvented, starting from one hour deliveries from a virtual pantry within minutes from many homes, all the way to completely reinvented grocery stores. wallet share is changing as well from physical products to technology enabled experiences like more personalized hotels or “stay rooms” such as airbnb. space is transforming to be more efficient and serve people for multiple purposes   the brick and mortar as we know it will shift, and we are already seeing this. 3d printing will allow us to print items on demand, and even recycle, whereas ai will transform the experience to be truly personalized, whether that is tailored furniture or food plan unique for each individual. lastly, robotics are changing how we interact from food delivery to amazon echo. yet we are seeing more physical local bookstores, which might actually mean a rebirth of the community experience, unlike product experiences of amazon! we might even see more display retail rather than full inventory stores to provide community and shared time experiences with friends. however, these dynamics are hard to predict to the point it is hard to gauge the direction of change. will the future hold more or less local retail? more of less community experiences and spaces? instacart is disrupting the need for full grocery stores, while retail stores are also doubling as coffee shops or yoga studios when not in use. retail will be more efficient for more than just selling products or serving as local distribution hubs and product display hubs. we may even see the rise of mobile spaces taking over parking lots or having the ability to use space better and reach out to people. experiences, especially shared and community experiences, will be more in demand, be it sephora or yoga or coffee. retailing may take on other manifestations too hard to predict, but inventory carrying stores may be passe. as costs are lower to create products, strong branding will be more important and values based brands will become more important. on the other hand, custom clothing on the spot fit to your body, made robotically, may not be too far away. 3d printed custom items from sofas to shoes? as a result, with tools like robots and ai, we will be more efficient and will reduce costs to redistribute to other places. for instance, will we see roboticized restaurants building customized, fresher, and less expensive, or more accessible, fresh, fast food with no food deserts? in the future, we will be able to fully customize fabrics or outlets, we may be even able to 3d print these on demand, disrupting supply chains. sensors will become smaller and cheaper to enable more, if not most, things to be connected and controlled in a seamless way. we will have more data about us (whether it’s microbiome/genetic data for food, size/fit data for clothes, or music taste for buying composed music just for us using ai), that will allow for further personalization of our shopping list. microbiome/genetic data could influence our for grocery shopping, size/fit data   clothes, or music taste for buying composed music just for us. all that can be enabled by the use of ai. nevertheless, the use of such detailed data carries a possible danger connected to it, too. regulation will have to strengthen on who controls and owns what data. when it comes to services, the current labor force will shift. large companies will have less of a hold on workforce. because of technology, workforce will become more independent and flexible based on how these workers will want to spend their time. whether a dog walker works for wag on his/her own time, or a hairstylist no longer works at a salon and goes direct to the consumer via an on demand app, services will come to the person in a higher quality, more affordable, and more personalized way. labor mobility and nature of jobs will change substantially. i want more data about me and i want to control it, share it temporarily for a particular purpose to provide me services and rescind permission at will. will the blockchain allow this without centralized trust? ai is also allowing us to have more tailored experiences to either design the right furniture for our home. it can, make new foods using algorithms, be it watson cookbook or startups using ai to characterize proteins and design new foods., it can redefine our interactions with customer service when ordering an item. robotics are also changing the game   starting with amazon echo which changes how we interact with our environment, including shopping, e.g. via voice in our home. consumer facing robots will become more functional and empathetic. for instance, elderly care robotics can take care their needs or prevent elderly from getting lonely, to robotics that optimize manufacturing times and deliveries. robots will monitor elderly for their food and drink consumption and remind them to take their prescriptions but more importantly will entertain then and engage them in conversation and community connections, combating loneliness. technology will also enable families and kids of elderly to have a better grasp of their loved one’s health and status. robots will also transform the way kids can learn, creating more interactive, personalized education, and also robots for special needs people will create new ways to provide care. when it comes to entertainment, tv, music, and other media are transforming. music that was once the creation of songwriters and popstars, will be taken over by ai music and the same goes for tv shows. whether it be netflix or amazon, shows will be created based on what people want. entertainment will transform to be more than just 2d in the way we watch it today   whether it be holographic or virtual reality, entertainment will use more of our senses than what it exists today. the future will be dominated by new kinds of light field displays, new sound and haptic capabilities, ai driven robotics, ai driven music, art, entertainment and comedy in conjunction with human entertainers, artists, musicians enhancing the entertainment that can be done. plentiful designs, local supply chains, almost transparent retailing, ai driven and ai robotic assisted elderly care with human supplementation of elder services on an exception basis. 14. reinventing education key drivers: ai to personalize education, open source content, ai tutors, mobile and internet create more accessibility to knowledge and education, ai/ar/vr changing how students can get information. i recently asked a simple question: is majoring in liberal arts a mistake for students? the problem, i argued, is that the current liberal arts education does not teach critical thinking and scientific progress in the way that it should or in the way that stem does. now, stem perhaps, doesn’t teach enough of liberal arts   how to create real businesses from science and technology, and applications for best impacting the world. ironically, the more ai driven changes we postulate here happen, the more necessary a real liberal arts education will be, something i now call “modern thinking.” liberal arts was what greek elites indulged in when they did not have to work and servants and slaves did much of the work. schools teach “in the box” thinking, standardized bubbles tests versus encouraging creativity and thinking in new paradigms. the education system is full of opportunity, and yet, it’s an industry that’s challenging and complex to change. the purpose of education will be less about employment and more about inquiry (scientific and other), stimulation, curiosity, ethics/values and similar more ephemeral less quantifiable goals. i have argued for a new discipline called “modern thinking” as the principal curriculum for non professional majors. by 2050 this trend will be clear as will be clear we need to redefine the nature of work and education to “understand, pursue passion, pursue inquiry, not to get a job” as many routine jobs get roboticized or ai’ed. communities of people, virtual or physical, will play a large part in education and intellectual pursuit. with technology and new tools, accessibility and equality in education will change, no matter what style or subject of education you want. the ideal “tutor” for the task will always be available. ai tutors will not only allow for more affordable or free accessibility 24x7, but they will personalize education for each person. they will be able to assess where a student is, know the map of their knowledge and gaps in it and be able to guide a student through to their personal learning objectives. with technology and new tools, accessibility and equality in education will change, no matter what style or subject of education you want. the ideal “tutor” for the task will always be available. ai tutors will not only allow for more affordable or free accessibility 24x7, but they will personalize education for each person and widely accessible at low marginal cost. even for traditional grade or employment oriented education this is a massive multiplier of teacher resources, letting them be the human element of teaching and not stranding those for whom teachers and tutors are a luxury. and for skills or humanities education ai and social networking enable community learning is an additional multiplier. in the near future, there will be more diverse, location independent education at low cost. no need to go to stanford, there will be ai discussion in groups which will change cost structure. in the case that a majority of jobs get displaced by ai over time, this will also focus education to shift to teach other skills and change the curriculum. perhaps, because of this personalization, the very notion of majors such as stem or liberal arts will change altogether. these systems will serve humans. 15. reinventing business, cyber, defense, governmental services without too much elaboration, it is worth point out that business services, resource uses, and products have been changing and will change even more. the change will continue and even accelerate on both the production and services side. no business, be it fintech, consumer goods design and production, industrial products design, drug research or manufacturing, materials design, manufacturing, spare parts, sales ai agents, or customer support agents, will remain untouched. the entrepreneurial opportunity will be immense, but the areas are too diverse to cover individually. technology will have an impact all of these, though my focus here is on things an individual entrepreneur can drive, not on governmental or regulatory services. space and cyber will be often entrepreneurially driven, although the latter will have many state actors. i am less concerned here about governmental parts of gdp, except to note that safety nets for citizens will be easier to provide and such things as our traditional notions of taxes or redistributions will have to change. tea party folks, you have not seen anything yet. on cyber services i refer you to ai: scary for the right reasons but suffice it to say that massive entrepreneurial opportunities in defensive and offensive cyber tools and services will exist. there will be a large overlap with state institutions though corporate needs and markets will also escalate and grow. ai will dramatically escalate incidents of cyber warfare as rogue nations and criminal organizations use it to press their agendas, especially when it is outside our ability to assess or verify. this transition will resemble what we see when wind becomes a hurricane or a wave becomes a tsunami in terms of destructive power. imagine an ai agent trained on something like openai’s universe platform, learning to navigate thousands of online web environments, and being tuned to press an agenda. this could unleash a locust of intelligent bot trolls onto the web in a way that could destroy the very notion of public opinion. gan type ai approaches will make these continuously learning, continuously stressed and hence improving machines. alternatively, imagine a bot army of phone calls from the next evolution of lyrebird.ai with unique voices harassing the phone lines of congressmen and senators with requests for harmful policy changes. this danger, unlike the idea of robots taking over, has a strong chance of becoming a reality in the next decade. my biggest concern in the next decade is that ai will dramatically worsen today’s cyber security issues and be less verifiable than nuclear technology. massive entrepreneurial opportunities in defensive and offensive cyber tools and services will exist. entrepreneurs will need to push further innovation across these areas for true innovation to happen. much danger also lurks in these areas. 16. some khosla ventures companies addressing these areas: at khosla ventures, we look for companies who are aiming to make strides in the areas mentioned above. there will be many attempts, many will evolve, most will fail, and a few will hopefully become radical transformers. though, many seem like small efforts, as a group they will form a tsunami, and will sweep through impacting innovation and change. health and medicine: ai and data driven change from “practice of medicine to science of medicine” and specialty by specialty reinvention of the expertise, meaning virtual primary care doctors, cardiologists, psychiatrists, oncologists, is happening in our portfolio. companies like alivecor enable personal cardiologist like functions around ecg like diagnosing atrial fibrillation or reading an ecg for normality, although nothing as forward as a full cardiologist yet and definitely not the interventional cardiologist yet; to partially substitute a therapist like ginger.io, or perhaps the primary care doctor experience like forward, or create an ai physician like curai. others impact health by making accessible, population scale genetics services like color, or transforming xenotransplantation into an everyday, lifesaving medical procedure. genalyte is tackling blood testing results and making it easier to get them in almost real time in the doctor’s office versus a third party lab. rethinking oncology is the domain of guardant health or oncobox, which is personalizing genetic profiling to help oncologists decide which drug to use. conquering infectious diseases through the innovative use of next generation sequencing to analyze microbial cell free dna is something karius does, being able to scan for 1,300 viruses simultaneously. other companies are using data centric design to entirely rebuilding the next gen health insurance company, like oscar does. how about anticipating diseases with tools that enable physicians to predict alzheimer’s disease before the symptoms appear like neurotrak? viome is using predictive biomarkers to your microbiome’s transcriptome and your blood transcriptome at the strain ro rna level. using the microbiome, others are creating microbial therapeutics for inflammatory diseases (siolta) or to target bacteria based on genome (eligo). two pore guys is building a digital, hand held, testing platform for dna and rna that’s as accurate as medical lab equipment, but is as inexpensive and easy to use as a blood glucose monitor. zebra is using ai to rethink most radiologist functions for mri, ct, x rays for as little as $1, while vicarious surgical is enabling surgeons to do much much more with robots and ar (augmented reality). heartvista is developing a robust commercial mri system that will give comprehensive cardiovascular evaluation   real time data with much less skilled technicians! q bio is trying to reinvent the annual physical to be far more quantitative and useful pharmaceuticals: we believe that there will be ai based reinvention from small molecule chemicals to precise regulation of genes using biologicals in the pharmaceutical space. companies are predicting potential drug cures with the use of supercomputers, artificial intelligence, and a specialized algorithm that runs through millions of molecular structures. this can potentially reduce the cost and time involved in making new drug discoveries as our company atomwise is doing, or combine world leading expertise in machine learning and genome biology to transform medicine. such is the case with deep genomics who are designing biologicals, or offering low cost personalized genetic profiling to help cancer doctors decide which drugs will be most effective like oncobox. food and food production: ai, plant by plant robotics, and new methods to reducing chemicals, and precision agriculture are changing the way we produce and consume food. from reinventing the burger to be all plant based to end animal husbandry,while at the same time reducing environmental impact, like impossible foods to creating a new plant based egg substitute using science like hampton creek. what if you could develop sustainable and nutritious food products by matching the protein, fat, and carbohydrate distribution and content of traditional dairy products with a mixture of the proteins, fats, and carbohydrates from plants like ripple? in terms of food production and restaurants, companies are using robotics to make restaurants more efficient, increase food safety, and reallocate funds to higher quality food. on the agricultural process side, imagine using computer vision and robotics to improve agriculture like blue river (sold to john deere), who specifically enables farmers to spray herbicides only where weeds are present. or to make farms more manageable with granular (sold to dupont) or climate insurance more accessible with climate corporate (sold to monsanto)? satellite imaging is allowing farmers to better predict and optimize farming practices like, the services provided by both rocket lab. imagine a world where we can use robotics and ai to reduce pesticides, increase efficiency, and create healthier foods   we are only at the beginning. financial system: large institutional bodies are often the most posed for disruption from financial services, risk and insurance, blockchain and software contracts based services, efficient exchanges, accessibility, and even legal services. new small business and consumer services like are provided to by square. affirm or fundbox can make larger purchases, banking, loans, professional help more accessible without credit risk, while stripe can make payment processing easier. even, as an example, is rethinking insurance and credit for the modern consumer   managing one’s salary, allowing the customer to allocate a small portion per month to an “emergency” amount to be used when a customer may be in a financial bind. other companies are using blockchain to reimagine aspects of the financial system   for instance, digitizing experimental money to support blockchain to render it more liquid like blockstream or allowing users to build bitcoin applications using an enterprise grade blockchain api like chain. adding to liquidity and efficiency are companies like opendoor which make home selling much easier and faster. construction and buildings, housing: 3d printing, modular factory built, and housing efficiency are a few areas that have opportunity. imagine 3d printing a house, or using manufacturing techniques to create lower cost units like katera, or using robots to transform a small apartment into what feels like a larger space like ori. other companies are using robotics to make kitchens and restaurants more efficient like spyce, and momentum is changing city spaces by fully roboticized restaurant kitchens. arevo, as an example, makes ultra strong 3d printed carbon fiber composite materials, while vicarious is creating robots who can help construct and build, replacing human workers. education: ai and open source reduce need for infrastructure as well as manpower for education. imagine a platform for academics to share research papers like academia.edu or an online platform that facilitates interaction among students and instructors like piazza. new platforms from piazza (college) a and kiddom for k 12, now used by one in ten of all us teachers, allow for teachers and students to share assignments, provide feedback, grade, and review reports all in one place are enabling more collaboration and better results in education. ck12, a related non profit, is making k 12 content free and multi dimensional while also building ai tutors to make quality education accessible. manufacturing: 3d printing, robotics, new materials, ai design. imagine 3d printing metals like digital alloys. velo3d develops a technology that will disrupt 3d printing in metals and arevo that is changing composites manufacturing and affordability. add robotics technologies like vicarious, berkshire grey and manufacturing, which has been relatively isolated from change is feeling the pressures and innovation. transportation: imagine rethinking transportation with autonomous cars and ways to help people get where they need to go faster, cheaper, and with less impact on the environment. in the future, we will simply have self driving cars as part of a fleet of taxis such as voyage, or perhaps have alternate shorter destination methods of getting around, such as electric skateboards, like boosted boards. hyperloop, arevo. energy and climate, including water: some companies are developing a completely new high power, long cycle life, low cost battery technology for stationary applications like natron, or building a flexible solar cell design that minimizes the amount of semiconducting material used like caelux. there are breakthroughs in energy storage for automotive such as quantumscape, a company developing the first commercial solid state electrical energy storage devices for automotive applications. others are trying to develop and commercialize new battery technology or develop stabilization for electric grids like varentec or minimize home electricity consumptions like bidgely or view making window glass more efficient. there are companies who are using new techniques and approaches with technology for geothermal energy and altarock or lanzatech using waste gases form steel and other industrial process to turn that into useful products. like all great technology, nuclear energy can be used to create new options for converting low level waste into vast energy sources like terrapower, while companies like view glass and soraa reduce building energy consumption. and, of course, efforts like breakthrough energy ventures have the potential for incubating long term technologies for decarbonization. 17. the silicon valley culture i’m very optimistic about silicon valley. the way to look at silicon valley is to ask “how many new things are starting up?”. it is especially important in contrasting it to the rest of the world. the rest of the world thinks they know what’s important, but the silicon valley psych (to me silicon valley is a culture not a place and is starting to spread into many parts of the world from shanghai, bangalore, helsinki to tel aviv) is to be open minded. it means to discover and not assume, learn not know, be unreasonable but pragmatic, and determined in not giving up when the going gets rough. it is not being foolish and yet foolish enough to try things others won’t, to be naive enough to not be dissuaded easily, ask fundamental questions around “why not?”, and not “how has it been done before or tried before”…. ask anyone in washington or wall street or any other institutional agent what’s important in energy, in climate? it’s general electric and siemens. i’d give you odds that no large innovation will come out of any institutional player. silicon valley doesn’t know what’s important either, but what silicon valley does really, really well is originated interesting ideas and experiments to test these ideas, instead of opining, pontificating or asserting specialty or seniority without proof of merit. you think uber is a mess. i think of uber as having started the change in our notion of transportation, started with a limo service at the very high end; just like airbnb started with brokering rooms in philadelphia in 2008 during the democratic national convention and the brokering of rooms. that seed of an idea ends up being way more important than hilton hotels after almost a hundred years since they have been around. that’s what is crucial. to me, that is what’s really most important about silicon valley. while the world thinks they know what’s important; that volkswagen or general motors is important to innovation in cars, the fact is they’re largely irrelevant to innovation (except incremental innovation). it is ‘some improbable’ that really matters. these improbables, once they get a toehold, expand, evolve and improve and can become disproportionate compared to their humble start. they also feed on other new innovations. when they fail their efforts appear to be hubris but apriori categorization of what is hubris and what is world changing is near impossible. that improbable initially was tesla (and they can still fail), but will be supercharged by the google/waymo and the uber experiments. the combination almost certainly will upend public transportation in the future, whether either of these efforts fails or succeeds because they have put the world on a different trajectory. it will enable anywhere to anywhere ride on demand for $1 in most cities in america with public, transportation while providing better service and lower cost than any public transit service of consequence. incidentally, it may remove the need for large scale city parking spots and open space for parks or housing. it may shrink distances and commutes, eliminate more than half the auto industry and its needs for steel and rubber, and collateral gdp! this loss of gdp (near zero if service is free or near free like libraries or information search are today) will be a good thing. it’s the improbable, like uber, tesla and waymo in 2010, that’s important. the seed of ideas along with passion to try it starts new paradigms and it almost doesn’t matter who best commercializes them. i will even admit that silicon valley driven change will sometimes be scaled because of or by large companies (we welcome gm to driverless cars!) but the initiation of new directions is what is socially important. you know, volkswagen’s not going to reinvent transportation. big companies do help scale innovations and bring gobs of capital later when risk of a new phenomenon is low (walmart in retail?) but they’d rather stay safe and not be wrong. uber can get lots of flack . nevertheless, the fundamental innovation they have caused, what uber started, tesla started; google started with waymo and driverless cars, will completely replace all public transportation, whether uber succeeds or fails, with what is the new style of public transportation. this seemed completely inconceivable five years ago by anyone in auto or transportation businesses and inconceivable coming from and driven by any large institutional thinking. self driving cars and even electrics were fifty years away till waymo asked “why?”! what will be interesting and completely unpredictable is whether cities will run it, like they do public transportation or will they contract it out to a waymo or a google or a tesla, or somebody else. in 2004 i gave a talk titled “the device that used to be a phone” (i had stolen that title idea from somebody but not sure who) and i got right the basic idea that a phone would not be used mostly for talking, but what i got embarrassingly wrong was the cases it would be used for. i was wrong in unimportant ways, but spot on in the most important trends, the general direction of other uses for a mobile device. this is the essence of silicon valley, and why reinvention will be driven by silicon valley and not the institutions we rely on and take comfort in. what people confuse outside of silicon valley is this notion that i’m almost certain of that the big guys are unimportant to real “big step” innovation. what’s hard to say is the opposite. improbable, like uber was, or airbnb was, or google was in 1998, is not unimportant. in fact, the only thing that’s probably important is the improbable. we have no way of telling which improbable is important. and because silicon valley runs so many experiments and people love to write about all the failures, the hubris, the messes, the trivial, the fraudulent, or self aggrandizing claims because they, uber, theranos, juicero, soylent, make best headlines. these same factors are critical to get the self delusional attempts at grandiose or evolutionary innovation. if these entrepreneurs had normal expectations, they would not attempt the things they do attempt. and their failures and diversion into societally good or bad business is a necessary side effect. most businesses are improbable and fail but the few (1 in 1000? 1 in 10,000?) that emerge as game changers have disproportionately large impact. as martin luther king jr. said, human progress depends upon the socially maladjusted. and george bernard shaw said that reasonable people adapt themselves to the world, the unreasonable man (he should have added “and woman” but he didn’t) adapts the world to them. hence, human progress depends upon the unreasonable man. writers can write about or rail against or laugh at all the naive attempts, the hubris, the pretend unicorn valuations and the vast amount of drama that is silicon valley. however, all these things are largely irrelevant in the long run though they make a good “people’ magazine for silicon valley and cause clicks on headlines. they do keep the media in business though with salacious content! yes, investors get mislead or just plain lose their money. yes, they cause false hopes and even collateral damage to helpful institutions. but it’s the 1 percent or even 0.1 percent that succeed that cause the majority of technology driven change in society. all i’m saying is startups drive the vast majority of innovation, not the institutional incumbents. it is this non institutional driven change that frees us from the straitjacket of conventional wisdom and lets us really change the world. the experts that inhabit this world are experts in a previous version of the world and live by extrapolation. they do not aim at inventing a new future and as skeptics never do the seemingly impossible. great entrepreneurs, and there are plenty of incremental ones too that do good work, invent the future they want. i would also state without proof but with plenty of experience across many industries, from wall street to more mainstream businesses, that silicon valley entrepreneurs have a larger percentage of people who are mission driven, whether the mission is societal or local or silly, than most other businesses i have seen. though it is important to acknowledge that silicon valley has its good and bad apples and public scrutiny will help improve things. and that it’s generally positive impact has many downsides we must consider and worry about as discussed in one dimension in “ai: scary for the right reasons ”. some of these innovations, not surprisingly, have disruptive effects, both good ones and bad ones. but in areas with large changes most of the effects are unpredictable or unknowable in advance. with every large advantage comes some disadvantages but contrary to punditry about “they should have known” or it “causes job losses” the discovery and fixes necessarily have to be iteratively discovered and iteratively fixed, sometimes with regulatory or public activists oversight. the counter push for “no change” is often driven by those disrupted who are in an uncomfortable business position of being disrupted (the car business or taxi business or the advertising business for example) and who may leverage the genuine concerns of activists or press. this part of the “process” comes from inability to foresee “how and driven by whom”, companies and ideas develop (the alternative is not to do anything innovative, not to know in advance every consequence or path). naivety of traditionalists can and does slow down great benefit to society from these disruptive changes. the traditional ugly factory farming cattle business or egg business has no love for much better food alternatives like better burgers or better mayonnaise. it is these improbable sounding experiments that are really, really important about silicon valley. what is becoming even more exciting and healthy isn’t ipo’s, but the number of new areas the valley is attempting to innovate in. a few years ago, we invested in this hamburger company impossible foods. now, there are probably forty or fifty phds and another probably forty or fifty other technologists working on designing the perfect hamburger. why? the founders have started it, because thirty to fifty percent of our planet’s land area (and until elon musk gets us to mars, this is the only planet we have) is dedicated to animal husbandry, and he wanted an environmental better way of producing meat. in addition to other practices, he wants to avoid cruelty to animals, unhealthy food, environmental degradation, antibiotics in our food chain, etc. he wanted a couple of million dollars to run an experiment. could he do this? this kind of entrepreneur is the core of the silicon valley culture and though there are others abusing the public trust as has been widely and accurately reported, there is far more good than bad in this culture. there are good and bad people in any culture but silicon valley feels to me much more mission driven than most other cultures. it’s now gotten into a robust product that’s today a niche product, but the goal, clearly, for the founder, is to replace all animal husbandry. you are not going to get that from cargill or archer daniels midland or chevron or exxon. they won’t innovate because they don’t really care as much about the mission of a sustainable planet, despite their proclamations and madison avenue ads saying the contrary. and this disruption may disrupt their income statements. to be fair, anything else goes against their promise to their shareholders. do you think you could have innovation outside of this region? the one thing to realize is innovation can happen anywhere and everywhere. it is much more about the mindset and a culture than it is about a place. what makes it harder in other places is that when somebody innovates, they don’t get that support around them. silicon valley is different. i’m sorry to say if you have been fifteen years at hewlett packard or cisco, you’re not qualified to do any important job in the startup world. every other part of the world people say “wow, you work for ge or citibank!” here, they say “you’ve been working for ge and cisco for fifteen years?” you’re not hirable by anybody trying to really experiment and innovate. you’re not qualified in any way if you’re at cisco for fifteen years, or ibm for fifteen years, or cargill for fifteen years, or united healthcare for fifteen years. again, it’s the mindset that enables new ideas or new tools for testing that creates the disruptive innovation that matters. here too much experience can be a handicap. i have gone through an exercise of trying to just see if i could find a large innovation coming out of big companies in the last twenty five years, a major innovation (there’s plenty of minor innovations, incremental innovations that come out of big companies) but i couldn’t find one in the last twenty five years. you look at retail, did amazon innovate this or walmart? media: did abc, nbc, cbs do it or twitter/youtube/facebook? did boeing or lockheed innovate space or spacex? did gm which started early in electric cars and spent more money change cars or tesla/waymo/uber? did wells fargo or bank of america change financial services or did square/stripe/affirm do that? did ibm change computing or sun/vmware/amazon aws? yes, the credit card 40 50 years ago was “credit on plastic” was the largest existing company, “barely large innovation” i could come up with though i am sure there are a few others. no, 3m does not qualify with the yellow sticky in my view. 18. conclusion the way to look at the world is seven hundred million people or so on the planet have a rich lifestyle. it’s energy rich, it’s resource rich, it’s healthcare services rich, it’s transportation rich, it’s a rich lifestyle. seven billion people want it. can we do ten times as much of everything the same way? the obvious answer is no. technology is the necessary, albeit not sufficient, resource multiplier. it is the only thing that can multiply resources. now, politics can still screw all that up, and that’s why i say technology is necessary and the only thing that can multiply resources, but it is not sufficient. social, political and cultural issues matter immensely. this is why i am so bullish about the role silicon valley can play in meeting social needs. and it’s fun to do and do it in a non institutional way, meaning citibank won’t solve financial inclusion, square will. if anybody does it. the vast majority of u.s. jobs in 1900 were in agriculture. by the year 2000, it was approximately two percent of all jobs, so most jobs got displaced. i have recently looked at the top twenty job categories in the united states, and it was very clear that at least fifteen of them will have more than fifty percent of the jobs replaceable. i cannot say with precision whether it will happen in twenty five years or fifty years. it depends on which entrepreneur takes it upon themselves to go innovate that job category. such dramatic social change will render all the economic metrics that everybody in washington pays attention to, “mostly meaningless but looking great”. and it will feel very painful to the people who are affected as this the next technology revolution will drive abundance and income disparity. that’s the inclusiveness part. this is what worries me about technology. i’m a technology optimist, but there are consequences and side effects that aren’t great   that we should all worry about. we will, however, have the resources to address them adequately. it is important to note the cautions here. there is extreme variability in the timing and even the nature of the innovations that will emerge. there is also a huge path dependence based on when, who and why they innovate and that may cause the end result to be different. there are all kinds of entrepreneurs with good, bad and indifferent objectives in silicon valley. who does what matters to where we get. there are a huge number of unknown unknowns in this speculation (and yes it is all speculation, not forecast). almost certainly this document will look naive in twenty five years. but the biggest of the big unknowns is artificial intelligence (ai) and even more so artificial general intelligence (agi). i have had intelligent people forecast it as 5 10 years away and others say 10x that time. personally, i’d peg that at the boundary of this document or around 5 10 cycles of 2 3 year individual innovation cycles in ai. that could change everything. it may only need a few hardware breakthroughs to scale computing 1000x or it may need many years of software invention. regardless, when it happens it may be impact equivalent of a 100x nuclear like technologies (again for good and evil!). and unlike nuclear it may not be verifiable as to who has what technology. the world would be very dramatically different. in short time we may need to adjust capitalism which was designed for economic efficiency to a new era of abundance, concentration of power and much more of a winner take all world. life will be very, very different. fortunately, capitalism is by permission of democracy and i hope that the means to reduce disparity and minimum living standards will be taken advantage of by societal choices. if there is a 90 percent chance of failure on a transformative project, then we have a 10 percent chance of transforming the world. that’s pretty great. if ten such fusion projects were attempted, we would possibly change the world. and if we have ten attempts (or a hundred) each at many different areas covered in this essay, we will really change the world. change and innovation will be technology driven, non institutional, breaking the rules, all radical approach. let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater when things go wrong but instead focus on net societal benefit. and in this non institutional way of doing things, though less predictable, it is way more exciting. it is probably the main way we will get to getting seven billion people the kind of lifestyle they’d all want. as yogi berra said “it’s tough to make predictions, especially about the future,” but if there is an answer, this speculation is more likely to be right than any other single prediction. on a more personal note, i’m going to keep making mistakes, because i’m speculating on a lot of things and then backing them. my willingness to fail allows me to succeed. and if i was too afraid to fail, i wouldn’t try the things and i would, well, fail to try, instead of trying and failing. there’s a world of a difference difference between those two. i think most people fail to try and so they never fail, but in my view, they always fail, because they fail to even attempt something. it is a really important cultural difference. another thing you learn in our business is humility. how often you’re wrong. the best of you entrepreneurs (i’d love to see a large institution prove me wrong on my mostly non institutional reinvention thesis) work on these kinds of problems, and that’s what’s so exciting to me, that is what keeps me motivated. that is why i am working eighty hours a week at age sixty two. i get so much flack for believing machines and systems can do medicine better than humans. however, that’s just one of many. or that most jobs will be replaced or fusion energy is possible in my lifetime or that ai can make work an option for most people who will work if they want to work, but not need to work because we will have sufficient abundance. it may or may not work but these ideas are worth attempting. imagine the possible! to elaborate more on founders   if you don’t have strong religious beliefs about what you’re trying to do, you tend to not succeed. so, you have to be totally obstinate about your vision, but flexible about your tactics. most founders don’t get to their vision in a straight line. it zig zags, goes left, goes right, survives long enough, evolve, get lucky. no one has yet reached everest without getting to multiple base camps. so while being obstinate about one’s vision, one has to be flexible on one’s tactics. a pragmatic visionary so to speak in a world where most people are one or the other. and above all luck plays a huge part of success, and good founders give themselves multiple shots on goal. you want founders to think flexibly, listen but not be agreeable with everybody who gives them advice. this reinvention will be chaotic, disruptive, unpredictable with many failed attempts but failure won’t matter; successes will. media folks will have a field day with stories of hubris, missed or misled expectations and failure. the disruption will be temporarily painful to some as being disrupted is never fun. we have to get things right and meet society’s expectations of technology to help equality, diversity and more. new technologies also rock the world by reallocating power and wealth and accentuating inequality. fortunately, capitalism is by permission of democracy, and the electorate will have the ability to rectify the inequalities. all these social factors will become urgent and critical to enable this transformation through democracy and to be fair to the people who will be impacted. it’s impact in the less democratic societies is harder to predict.the future is not knowable, but it is inevitable and inventable so we need great entrepreneurs and technologists to invent the future now.       12 entrepreneurship zealot, grounded technology optimist, believer in the power of ideas help status about careers press blog privacy terms text to speech teams

journal of research in innovative teaching & learning issn: 2397 7604 article publication date: 3 april 2017 the purpose of this paper is to present an analytical review of the educational innovation field in the usa. it outlines classification of innovations, discusses the hurdles to innovation, and offers ways to increase the scale and rate of innovation based transformations in the education system. the paper is based on a literature survey and author research. us education badly needs effective innovations of scale that can help produce the needed high quality learning outcomes across the system. the primary focus of educational innovations should be on teaching and learning theory and practice, as well as on the learner, parents, community, society, and its culture. technology applications need a solid theoretical foundation based on purposeful, systemic research, and a sound pedagogy. one of the critical areas of research and innovation can be cost and time efficiency of the learning. several practical recommendations stem out of this paper: how to create a base for large scale innovations and their implementation; how to increase effectiveness of technology innovations in education, particularly online learning; how to raise time and cost efficiency of education. innovations in education are regarded, along with the education system, within the context of a societal supersystem demonstrating their interrelations and interdependencies at all levels. raising the quality and scale of innovations in education will positively affect education itself and benefit the whole society. originality is in the systemic approach to education and educational innovations, in offering a comprehensive classification of innovations; in exposing the hurdles to innovations, in new arguments about effectiveness of technology applications, and in time efficiency of education. serdyukov, p. (2017), "innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it?", journal of research in innovative teaching & learning, vol. 10 no. 1, pp. 4 33. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit 10 2016 0007 emerald publishing limited copyright © 2017, peter serdyukov published in the journal of research in innovative teaching & learning. this article is published under the creative commons attribution (cc by 4.0) licence. anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. the full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode necessity is the mother of invention (plato). education, being a social institution serving the needs of society, is indispensable for society to survive and thrive. it should be not only comprehensive, sustainable, and superb, but must continuously evolve to meet the challenges of the fast changing and unpredictable globalized world. this evolution must be systemic, consistent, and scalable; therefore, school teachers, college professors, administrators, researchers, and policy makers are expected to innovate the theory and practice of teaching and learning, as well as all other aspects of this complex organization to ensure quality preparation of all students to life and work. here we present a systemic discussion of educational innovations, identify the barriers to innovation, and outline potential directions for effective innovations. we discuss the current status of innovations in us education, what educational innovation is, how innovations are being integrated in schools and colleges, why innovations do not always produce the desired effect, and what should be done to increase the scale and rate of innovation based transformations in our education system. we then offer recommendations for the growth of educational innovations. as examples of innovations in education, we will highlight online learning and time efficiency of learning using accelerated and intensive approaches. for an individual, a nation, and humankind to survive and progress, innovation and evolution are essential. innovations in education are of particular importance because education plays a crucial role in creating a sustainable future. “innovation resembles mutation, the biological process that keeps species evolving so they can better compete for survival” (hoffman and holzhuter, 2012, p. 3). innovation, therefore, is to be regarded as an instrument of necessary and positive change. any human activity (e.g. industrial, business, or educational) needs constant innovation to remain sustainable. the need for educational innovations has become acute. “it is widely believed that countries’ social and economic well being will depend to an ever greater extent on the quality of their citizens’ education: the emergence of the so called ‘knowledge society’, the transformation of information and the media, and increasing specialization on the part of organizations all call for high skill profiles and levels of knowledge. today’s education systems are required to be both effective and efficient, or in other words, to reach the goals set for them while making the best use of available resources” (cornali, 2012, p. 255). according to an organization for economic cooperation and development (oecd) report, “the pressure to increase equity and improve educational outcomes for students is growing around the world” (vieluf et al., 2012, p. 3). in the usa, underlying pressure to innovate comes from political, economic, demographic, and technological forces from both inside and outside the nation. many in the usa seem to recognize that education at all levels critically needs renewal: “higher education has to change. it needs more innovation” (wildavsky et al., 2012, p. 1). this message, however, is not new   in the foreword to the 1964 book entitled innovation in education, arthur foshay, executive officer of the horace mann lincoln institute of school experimentation, wrote, “it has become platitudinous to speak of the winds of change in education, to remind those interested in the educational enterprise that a revolution is in progress. trite or not, however, it is true to say that changes appear wherever one turns in education” (matthew, 1964, p. v). yet, more than 50 years later, we realize that the actual pace of educational innovations and their implementation is too slow as shown by the learning outcomes of both school and college graduates, which are far from what is needed in today’s world. jim shelton, assistant deputy secretary of the office of innovation and improvement in the us department of education, writes, “whether for reasons of economic growth, competitiveness, social justice or return on tax payer investment, there is little rational argument over the need for significant improvement in us educational outcomes. further, it is irrefutable that the country has made limited improvement on most educational outcomes over the last several decades, especially when considered in the context of the increased investment over the same period. in fact, the total cost of producing each successful high school and college graduate has increased substantially over time instead of decreasing   creating what some argue is an inverted learning curve […].” “education not only needs new ideas and inventions that shatter the performance expectations of today’s status quo; to make a meaningful impact, these new solutions must also “scale,” that is grow large enough, to serve millions of students and teachers or large portions of specific underserved populations” (shelton, 2011). yet, something does not work here. lack of innovation can have profound economic and social repercussions. america’s last competitive advantage, warns harvard innovation education fellow tony wagner, its ability to innovate, is at risk as a result of the country’s lackluster education system (creating innovators, 2012). derek bok, a former harvard university president, writes, “[…] neither american students nor our universities, nor the nation itself, can afford to take for granted the quality of higher education and the teaching and learning it provides” (bok, 2007, p. 6). hence it is central for us to make us education consistently innovative and focus educational innovations on raising the quality of learning at all levels. yet, though there is a good deal of ongoing educational research and innovation, we have not actually seen discernable improvements in either school students’ or college graduates’ achievements to this day. suffice it to mention a few facts. program for international student assessment (pisa) evaluations keep revealing disappointing results for our middle school (pew research center, 2015); a large number of high school graduates are not ready for college (college preparedness, 2012); and employers, in turn, are often dissatisfied with college graduates (thomson, 2015; jaschik, 2015). no one, be they students, parents, academia, business, or society as a whole, are pleased with these outcomes. could it be that our education system is not sufficiently innovative? danny crichton, an entrepreneur, in his blog the next wave of education innovation writes expressly, “few areas have been as hopeful and as disappointing as innovation in education. education is probably the single most important function in our society today, yet it remains one of the least understood, despite incredible levels of investment from venture capitalists and governments. why do students continue to show up in a classroom or start an online course? how do we guide students to the right knowledge just as they need to learn it? we may have an empirical inkling and some hunches, but we still lack any fundamental insights. that is truly disappointing. with the rise of the internet, it seemed like education was on the cusp of a complete revolution. today, though, you would be excused for not seeing much of a difference between the way we learn and how we did so twenty years ago” (crichton, 2015). editors of the book reinventing higher education: the promise of innovation, ben wildavsky, andrew kelly, and kevin carey write, “the higher education system also betrays an innovation deficit in another way: a steady decline in productivity driven by a combination of static or declining output paired with skyrocketing prices (wildavsky et al., 2012, p. 3). this despairing mood is echoed by groom and lamb’s statement in educause review, “today, innovation is increasingly conflated with hype, disruption for disruption’s sake, and outsourcing laced with a dose of austerity driven downsizing” (groom and lamb, 2014). usa success has always been driven by innovation and has a unique capacity for growth (zeihan, 2014). nevertheless, it is indeed a paradox: while the usa produces more research, including in education, than any other country (science watch, 2009), we do not see much improvement in the way our students are prepared for life and work. the usa can be proud of great scholars, such as john dewey, b.f. skinner, abraham maslow, albert bandura, howard gardner, jerome bruner, and many others who have contributed a great deal to the theory of education. yet, has this theory yielded any innovative approaches for the teaching and learning practice that have increased learning productivity and improved the quality of the output? the usa is the home of the computer and the internet, but has the information revolution helped to improve the quality of learning outcomes? where and how, then, are all these educational innovations applied? it seems, write spangehl and hoffman, that “american education has taken little advantage of important innovations that would increase instructional capacity, effectiveness, and productivity” (2012, p. 21). “the new ‘job factory’ role american universities have awkwardly stuffed themselves into may be killing the modern college student’s spirit and search for meaning” (mercurio, 2016). what is interesting here is that while we are still undecided as to what to do with our struggling schools and universities and how to integrate into them our advanced inventions, other nations are already benefiting from our innovations and have in a short time successfully built world class education systems. it is ironic that an admirable finnish success was derived heavily from us educational research. pasi sahlberg, a finnish educator and author of a bestselling book, the finnish lessons: what can the world learn from educational change in finland, said in an interview to the huffington post, “american scholars and their writings, like howard gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences, have been influential in building the much admired school system in finland” (rubin, 2015); so wrote other authors (strauss, 2014). singapore, south korea, china, and other forward looking countries also learned from great us educational ideas. we cannot say that us educators and society are oblivious to the problems in education: on the contrary, a number of educational movements have taken place in recent us history (e.g. numerous educational reforms since 1957 to this day, including recent nclb, race to the top, and the common core). universities and research organizations opened centers and laboratories of innovation (harvard innovation lab, presidential innovation laboratory convened by american council on education, center for innovation in education at the university of kentucky, nasa stem innovation lab, and recently created national university center for innovation in learning). some institutions introduced programs focusing on innovation (master’s program in technology, innovation, and education at harvard graduate school of education; master of arts in education and innovation at the webster university). new organizations have been set up (the international centre for innovation in education, innovative schools network, center for education reform). regular conferences on the topic are convened (aera, asu gsv summit, national conference on educational innovation, the nueva school for the innovative learning conference). excellent books have been written by outstanding innovators such as andy hargreaves (2003), hargreaves and shirley (2009), hargreaves et al. (2010), michael fullan (2007, 2010), yong zhao (2012), pasi sahlberg (2011), tony wagner (2012), mihaliy csikszentmihalyi (2013), and ken robinson (2015). there is even an office of innovation and improvement in the us department of education, which is intended to “[…] drive education innovation by both seeding new strategies, and bringing proven approaches to scale” (office of innovation and improvement, 2016). and still, innovations do not take hold in american classrooms on a wide scale, which may leave the nation behind in global competition. society’s failure to anticipate the problems and their outcomes may have unpredictable consequences, as pulitzer prize winner and professor jared diamond, university of california, los angeles, writes in his book, collapse: how societies choose to fail or succeed (diamond, 2005). yong zhao interpreted diamond’s findings as “[…] society’s inability to perceive or unwillingness to accept large and distant changes   and thus work to come up with the right response   is among one of the chief reasons that societies fail. this inability also leads human beings to look for short term outcomes and seek immediate gratification” (zhao, 2012, p. 162). it looks like the issue of educational innovation goes beyond the field itself and requires a strong societal response. three big questions arise from this discussion: why, having so many innovators and organizations concerned with innovations, does our education system not benefit from them? what interferes with creating and, especially, implementing transformative, life changing, and much needed innovations across schools and colleges in this country? how can we grow, support, and disseminate worthy innovations effectively so that our students succeed in both school and university and achieve the best learning outcomes that will adequately prepare them for life and work? let us first take a look at what is an educational innovation. creativity is thinking up new things. innovation is doing new things (theodore levitt). to innovate is to look beyond what we are currently doing and develop a novel idea that helps us to do our job in a new way. the purpose of any invention, therefore, is to create something different from what we have been doing, be it in quality or quantity or both. to produce a considerable, transformative effect, the innovation must be put to work, which requires prompt diffusion and large scale implementation. innovation is generally understood as “[…] the successful introduction of a new thing or method” (brewer and tierney, 2012, p. 15). in essence, “[…] innovation seems to have two subcomponents. first, there is the idea or item which is novel to a particular individual or group and, second, there is the change which results from the adoption of the object or idea” (evans, 1970, p. 16). thus, innovation requires three major steps: an idea, its implementation, and the outcome that results from the execution of the idea and produces a change. in education, innovation can appear as a new pedagogic theory, methodological approach, teaching technique, instructional tool, learning process, or institutional structure that, when implemented, produces a significant change in teaching and learning, which leads to better student learning. so, innovations in education are intended to raise productivity and efficiency of learning and/or improve learning quality. for example, khan’s academy and moocs have opened new, practically unlimited opportunities for massive, more efficient learning. efficiency is generally determined by the amount of time, money, and resources that are necessary to obtain certain results. in education, efficiency of learning is determined mainly by the invested time and cost. learning is more efficient if we achieve the same results in less time and with less expense. productivity is determined by estimating the outcomes obtained vs the invested effort in order to achieve the result. thus, if we can achieve more with less effort, productivity increases. hence, innovations in education should increase both productivity of learning and learning efficiency. educational innovations emerge in various areas and in many forms. according to the us office of education, “there are innovations in the way education systems are organized and managed, exemplified by charter schools or school accountability systems. there are innovations in instructional techniques or delivery systems, such as the use of new technologies in the classroom. there are innovations in the way teachers are recruited, and prepared, and compensated. the list goes on and on” (us department of education, 2004). innovation can be directed toward progress in one, several, or all aspects of the educational system: theory and practice, curriculum, teaching and learning, policy, technology, institutions and administration, institutional culture, and teacher education. it can be applied in any aspect of education that can make a positive impact on learning and learners. in a similar way, educational innovation concerns all stakeholders: the learner, parents, teacher, educational administrators, researchers, and policy makers and requires their active involvement and support. when considering the learners, we think of studying cognitive processes taking place in the the brain during learning   identifying and developing abilities, skills, and competencies. these include improving attitudes, dispositions, behaviors, motivation, self assessment, self efficacy, autonomy, as well as communication, collaboration, engagement, and learning productivity. to raise the quality of teaching, we want to enhance teacher education, professional development, and life long learning to include attitudes, dispositions, teaching style, motivation, skills, competencies, self assessment, self efficacy, creativity, responsibility, autonomy to teach, capacity to innovate, freedom from administrative pressure, best conditions of work, and public sustenance. as such, we expect educational institutions to provide an optimal academic environment, as well as materials and conditions for achieving excellence of the learning outcomes for every student (program content, course format, institutional culture, research, funding, resources, infrastructure, administration, and support). education is nourished by society and, in turn, nourishes society. the national educational system relies on the dedication and responsibility of all society for its effective functioning, thus parental involvement, together with strong community and society backing, are crucial for success. a national education system is commonly the product of a distinctive set of historical, political, social, cultural, and economic effects. as it is a complete system, its different areas are not only interrelated and interdependent but act together. subsequently, any change in one of them may generate a change in others. a few examples of innovations in some areas that made a drastic impact on the whole educational system are: political (nclb (no child left behind act), race to the top); social (equal opportunities act, affirmative action policy, indivuals with disabilities education act); philosophical (constructivism, objectivism); cultural (moral education, multiculturalism, bilingual education); pedagogical (competence based education, stem (curriculum choices in school: science, technology, english, and mathematics); psychological (cognitive science, multiple intelligencies theory, maslow’s hierarchy of needs, learning style theory); and technological (computer based learning, networked learning, e learning). though these innovations left a significant mark on education, which of them helped improve productivity and quality of learning? under nclb, we placed too much focus on accountability and assessment and lost sight of many other critical aspects of education. in drawing too much attention to technology innovations, we may neglect teachers and learners in the process. stressing the importance of stem at the expense of music, arts and physical culture ignores young people’s personal, social, emotional, and moral development. reforming higher education without reforming secondary education is futile. trying to change education while leaving disfunctional societal and cultural mechanisms intact is doomed. it is crucial, therefore, when innovating to ask, “what is this innovation for?” “how will it work?” and “what effect will it produce?” many of us educators naively believe grand reforms or powerful technologies will transform our education system. did we not expect nclb to change our schools for the better? did we not hope that new information technologies would make education more effective and relieve teachers from tedious labor? however, again and again we realize that neither loud reforms nor wondrous technology will do the hard work demanded of teachers and learners. innovations can be categorized as evolutionary or revolutionary (osolind, 2012), sustaining or disruptive (christensen and overdorf, 2000; yu and hang, 2010). evolutionary innovations lead to incremental improvement but require continuity; revolutionary innovations bring about a complete change, totally overhauling and/or replacing the old with the new, often in a short time period. sustaining innovation perpetuates the current dimensions of performance (e.g. continuous improvement of the curriculum), while disrupting innovation, such as a national reform, radically changes the whole field. innovations can also be tangible (e.g. technology tools) and intangible (e.g. methods, strategies, and techniques). evolutionary and revolutionary innovations seem to have the same connotation as sustaining and disruptive innovations, respectively. when various innovations are being introduced in the conventional course of study, for instance universal design of learning (meyer et al., 2014); or more expressive presentation of new material using multimedia; or more effective teaching methods; or new mnemonic techniques, students’ learning productivity may rise to some extent. this is an evolutionary change. it partially improves the existing instructional approach to result in better learning. such learning methods as inquiry based, problem based, case study, and collaborative and small group are evolutionary innovations because they change the way students learn. applying educational technology (et) in a conventional classroom using an overhead projector, video, or ipad, are evolutionary, sustaining innovations because they change only certain aspects of learning. national educational reforms, however, are always intended to be revolutionary innovations as they are aimed at complete system renovation. this is also true for online learning because it produces a systemic change that drastically transforms the structure, format, and methods of teaching and learning. some innovative approaches, like “extreme learning” (extreme learning, 2012), which use technology for learning purposes in novel, unusual, or nontraditional ways, may potentially produce a disruptive, revolutionary effect. along with types of innovation, the degree of impact can be identified on the following three levels: adjustment or upgrading of the process: innovation can occur in daily performance and be seen as a way to make our job easier, more effective, more appealing, or less stressful. this kind of innovation, however, should be considered an improvement rather than innovation because it does not produce a new method or tool. the term innovative, in keeping with the dictionary definition, applies only to something new and different, not just better, and it must be useful (okpara, 2007). educators, incidentally, commonly apply the term “innovative” to almost any improvement in classroom practices; yet, to be consistent, not any improvement can be termed in this way. the distinction between innovation and improvement is in novelty and originality, as well as in the significance of impact and scale of change. modification of the process: innovation that significantly alters the process, performance, or quality of an existing product (e.g. accelerated learning (al), charter school, home schooling, blended learning). transformation of the system: dramatic conversion (e.g. bologna process; common core; fully automated educational systems; autonomous or self directed learning; online, networked, and mobile learning). first level innovations (with a small i) make reasonable improvements and are important ingredients of everyday life and work. they should be unequivocally enhanced, supported, and used. second level innovations either lead to a system’s evolutionary change or are a part of that change and, thus, can make a considerable contribution to educational quality. but we are more concerned with innovations of the third level (with a capital i), which are both breakthrough and disruptive and can potentially make a revolutionary, systemic change. all innnovations are ultimately directed at changing qualitative and/or quantitative factors of learning outcomes: qualitative: better knowledge, more effective skills, important competencies, character development, values, dispositions, effective job placement, and job performance; and quantitative: improved learning parameters such as test results, volume of information learned, amount of skills or competencies developed, college enrollment numbers, measured student performance, retention, attrition, graduation rate, number of students in class, cost, and time efficiency. innovation can be assessed by its novely, originality, and potential effect. as inventing is typically a time consuming and cost demanding experience, it is critical to calculate short term and long term expenses and consequences of an invention. they must demonstrate significant qualitative and/or quantitative benefits. as a psychologist mihalyi csikszentmihalyi writes, “human well being hinges on two factors: the ability to increase creativity and the ability to develop ways to evaluate the impact of new creative ideas” (csikszentmihalyi, 2013, p. 322). in education, we can estimate the effect of innovation via learning outcomes or exam results, teacher formative and summative, formal and informal assessments, and student self assessment. innovation can also be computed using such factors as productivity (more learning outcomes in a given time), time efficiency (shorter time on studying the same material), or cost efficiency (less expense per student) data. other evaluations can include the school academic data, college admissions and employment rate of school graduates, their work productivity and career growth. assessing the effects of innvoation can also be based on the scale of implementation: singular/local/limited; multiple/spread/significant; and system wide/total. this gradation correlates with the three levels of innovation described above: adjustment, modification, and transformation. to make a marked difference, educational innovation must be scalable and spread across the system or wide territory. prominent examples include khan academy in the usa, geeki labs in brazil (geeki), and bridge international academies in kenya (bridge). along with scale, the speed of adoption or diffusion, and cost are critical for maximizing the effect of innovation. innovations are nowadays measured and compared internationally. according to the 2011 oecd report (oecd, 2014), the usa was in 24th place in educational innovativeness in the world. this report singled out the use of student assessments for monitoring progress over time as the top organizational innovation, and the requirement that students were to explain and elaborate on their answers during science lessons as the top pedagogic innovation in the usa. overall, the list of innovations selected by oecd was disappointingly unimpressive. innovations usually originate either from the bottom of the society (individual inventors or small teams)   bottom up or grass root approach, or from the top (business or government)   top down or administrative approach. sometimes, innovations coming from the top get stalled on their way to the bottom if they do not accomplish their goal and are not appreciated or supported by the public. should they rise from the bottom, they may get stuck on the road to the top if they are misunderstood or found impractical or unpopular. they can also stop in the middle if there is no public, political, or administrative or financial backing. thus, innovations that start at the bottom, however good they are, may suffer too many roadblocks to be able to spread and be adopted on a large scale. consequently, it is up to politicians, administrators, and society to drive or stifle the change. education reforms have always been top down and, as they near the bottom, typically become diverted, diluted, lose strength, or get rejected as ineffective or erroneous. as michael fullan writes in the foreword to an exciting book, good to great to innovate: recalculating the route to career readiness, k012+, “[…] there is a good deal of reform going on in the education world, but much of it misses the point, or approaches it superficially” (sharratt and harild, 2015, p. xiii). innovations enriching education can be homegrown (come from within the system) or be imported (originate from outside education). examples of imported innovations that result from revolution, trend, or new idea include the information technology revolution, social media, medical developments (mri), and cognitive psychology. innovations can also be borrowed from superior international theories and practices (see globalization of education chapter). national reform may also be a route to innovation, for instance when a government decides to completely revamp the system via a national reform, or when an entire society embarks on a new road, as has happened recently in singapore, south korea, and finland. innovations may come as a result of inspiration, continuous creative mental activity, or “supply pushed” through the availability of new technological possibilities in production, or “demand led” based on market or societal needs (brewer and tierney, 2012, p. 15). in the first case, we can have a wide variety of ideas flowing around; in the second, we observe a ubiquitous spread of educational technologies across educational system at all levels; in the third, we witness a growth of non public institutions, such as private and charter schools and private universities. innovation in any area or aspect can make a change in education in a variety of ways. ultimately, however, innovations are about quality and productivity of learning (this does not mean we can forget about moral development, which prepares young people for life, work, and citizenship) (camins, 2015). every innovation must be tested for its potential efficiency. the roots of learning efficiency lie, however, not only in innovative technologies or teaching alone but even more in uncovering potential capacities for learning in our students, their intellectual, emotional, and psychological spheres. yet, while innovations in economics, business, technology, and engineering are always connected to the output of the process, innovation in education does not necessarily lead to improving the output (i.e. students’ readiness for future life and employment). test results, degrees, and diplomas do not signify that a student is fully prepared for his or her career. educational research is often disconnected from learning productivity and efficiency, school effectiveness, and quality output. innovations in educational theories, textbooks, instructional tools, and teaching techniques do not always produce a desired change in the quality of teaching and learning. what, then, is the problem with our innovations? why do not we get more concerned with learning productivity and efficiency? as an example, let us look at technology applications in teaching and learning. a tool is just an opportunity with a handle (kevin kelly). when analyzing innovations of our time, we cannot fail to see that an overwhelming majority of them are tangible, being either technology tools (laptops, ipads, smart phones) or technology based learning systems and materials, e.g., learning management system (lms), educational software, and web based resources. technology has always served as both a driving force and instrument of innovation in any area of human activity. it is then natural for us to expect that innovations based on et applications can improve teaching and learning. though technology is a great asset, nonetheless, is it the single or main source of today’s innovations, and is it wise to rely solely on technology? the rich history of et innovations is filled with optimism. just remember when tape recorders, video recorders, tv, educational films, linguaphone classes, overhead projectors, and multimedia first appeared in school. they brought so much excitement and hope into our classrooms! new presentation formats catered to various learning styles. visuals brought reality and liveliness into the classrooms. information and computer technology (ict) offered more ways to retrieve information and develop skills. with captivating communication tools (iphones, ipads, skype, facetime), we can communicate with anybody around the world in real time, visually, and on the go. today we are excited about online learning, mobile learning, social networking learning, moocs, virtual reality, virtual and remote laboratories, 3d and 4d printing, and gamification. but can we say all this is helping to produce better learning? are we actually using et’s potential to make a difference in education and increase learning output? larry cuban, an et researcher and writer, penned the following: “since 2010, laptops, tablets, interactive whiteboards, smart phones, and a cornucopia of software have become ubiquitous. we spent billions of dollars on computers. yet has academic achievement improved as a consequence? has teaching and learning changed? has use of devices in schools led to better jobs? these are the basic questions that school boards, policy makers, and administrators ask. the answers to these questions are ‘no,’ ‘no,’ and ‘probably not.’” (cuban, 2015). this cautionary statement should make us all think hard about whether more technology means better learning. technology is used in manufacturing, business, and research primarily to increase labor productivity. because integrating technology into education is in many ways like integrating technology into any business, it makes sense to evaluate technological applications by changes in learning productivity and quality. william massy and robert zemsky wrote in their paper, “using information technology to enhance academic productivity,” that “[…] technology should be used to boost academic productivity” (massy and zemsky, 1995). national educational technology standards also addressed this issue by introducing a special rubric: “apply technology to increase productivity” (national educational technology standards, 2004). why then has technology not contributed much to the productivity of learning? it may be due to a so called “productivity paradox” (brynjolfsson, 1993), which refers to the apparent contradiction between the remarkable advances in computer power and the relatively slow growth of productivity at the level of the whole economy, individual firms, and many specific applications. evidently, this paradox relates to technology applications in education. a conflict between public expectations of et effectiveness and actual applications in teaching and learning can be rooted in educators’ attitudes toward technology. what some educational researchers write about technology in education helps to reveal the inherent issue. the pillars and building blocks of twenty first century learning, according to linda baer and james mccormick (2012, p. 168), are tools, programs, services, and policies such as web enabled information storage and retrieval systems, digital resources, games, and simulations, eadvising and etutoring, online revenue sharing, which are all exclusively technological innovations. they are intended to integrate customized learning experiences, assessment based learning outcomes, wikis, blogs, social networking, and mobile learning. the foundation of all this work, as these authors write, is built on the resources, infrastructure, quality standards, best practices, and innovation. these are all useful, tangible things, but where are the intangible innovations, such as theoretical foundation, particularly pedagogy, psychology, and instructional methodology that are a true underpinning of teaching and learning? the emphasis on tools seems to be an effect of materialistic culture, which covets tangible, material assets or results. similarly, today’s students worry more about grades, certificates, degrees, and diplomas (tangible assets) than about gaining knowledge, an intangible asset (business dictionary, 2016). we may come to recognize that modern learning is driven more by technological tools than by sound theory, which is misleading. according to the unesco innovative teaching and learning (itl) research project conducted in several countries, “ict has great potential for supporting innovative pedagogies, but it is not a magic ingredient.” the findings suggest that “[…] when considering ict it is important to focus not on flash but on the student learning and 21st century skills that ict can enable” (unesco, 2013). as zhao and frank (2003)argue in their ecological model of technology integration in school, we should be interested in not only how much computers are used but also how computers are used. evidently, before starting to use technology we have to ask first, “what technology tools will help our students to learn math, sciences, literature and languages better, and how to use them efficiently to improve the learning outcomes?” thus, the problem of et innovations is twofold: any integration of technology in teaching and learning has to demonstrate an increased productivity of teaching and learning, but it can be achieved only when et applications are based on an effective pedagogic theory. technology innovation will eventually drive pedagogic innovations, without a doubt, however, this path is slower, more complicated, and leads to an enormous waste of financial, technical and human resources. more disquieting than even the lack of pedagogical foundation for technology enhanced education is the sincere belief of many educators that technology will fix all the problems they encounter in the classroom, be they live or virtual. consequently, fewer university professors nowadays perceive the need for pedagogic mastery in online teaching in addition to content area expertise as they reason technology will solve all instructional difficulties anyway. this belief is called “technocentrism” (pappert, 1990), which, according to nickols (2011), is common in higher education and e learning discussions. it is probably common in secondary school as well. unfortunately, educators often forget that the computer is only an extension of human abilities, not a replacement or substitute. we, as educators, must realize that for technology innovation to produce a positive effect in learning it must be preceded by pedagogic leadership, research, and sound theory; however, the reality is typically the reverse. we are excited to grab the new gadget and try to fit it into the classroom without preliminary assessment of its implementation challenges and potential effects, solid research, or laying out a theoretical foundation based on advanced pedagogic theory which will ensure its effective use. former kodak chairman george fisher described it this way, “even good people get locked into processes that may be totally inappropriate to deal with a new technology attacking from underneath (christensen and eyring, 2011, p. 16). technology (as an entity) contains an inherent pedagogical value (accuosti, 2014, p. 5). it pushes the limits of what educators can do but is not a magic wand; it is only a means, an instrument, a tool for an innovative teacher and learner. that we overestimate technology’s power in education has its roots in human anticipation of a miracle, or a hope of finding a quick fix. but “[…] we can’t just buy ipads (or any device), add water, and hope that strategy will usher schools to the leading edge of 21st century education. technology, by itself, isn’t curative. human agency shapes the path” (levasseur, 2012). we are all excited by the technology and information revolution and believe in its potential but “[…] perhaps the next important revolution isn’t technological, even as technology marches forward unabated. perhaps the revolution that we need, the one we should aspire to, is societal. indeed, the next revolution should be one of education, empathy, and a broader understanding of the world, and of its people and culture” (jiang, 2015). one of my students wrote in a recent online class, “students learn from their teachers, not from electronic gadgets.” do we understand how students learn in a technology based environment, one on one with the laptop or mobile phone? can we estimate possible changes in the students’ cognition, learning style, behavior, attitudes, values, and social relationships under the influence of electronic devices? it is certainly true that live interaction between students and their teachers offers worthy examples and enlightening experiences for students and gratifying moments for teachers. overestimating the power of technology, regrettably, leads to the deterioration of the “human element” (serdiukov, 2001) in technology based and, particularly, online teaching and learning. it further underestimates the need for sound pedagogy and quality teacher preparation. it may also have a devastating impact on our ability to socialize, collaborate, and survive. george friedman argues that computers have had “profoundly disruptive consequences on cultural live throughout the world” (friedman, 2012, p. 25), which could not have left education unperturbed. neil postman addressed another concern of overemphasizing the role of technology in education, cautioning against “[…] surrendering education to technology” (postman, 1993), which may have far reaching social and cultural consequences (serdyukov, 2015b). according to sousa (2014), the widespread use of technology is having both positive and negative effects on students’ attention and memory systems. a strong warning about the negative effects of the web comes from maurer et al. (2013), who caution that modern media, particularly networked computers, are endangering our capacity to think, to remember clearly, and to read and write with concentration; they also imperil creativity. “new technologies, whether or not they succeed in solving the problem that they were designed to solve, regularly create unanticipated new problems” (diamond, 2005, p. 505). there are numerous social, cultural and psychological side effects of technology enhanced or technology based education, among them placing unrealistic hopes on technology, which leads to weakening a student’s and teacher’s effort and eventually takes the teachers out of the equation. this in turn makes the outcomes of online learning overly dependent on the lms platform, washing away human interaction and communication by industrializing and formalizing learning. christensen and eyring (2011), who wrote about disruptive innovations that force universities to change, predict that teaching in the future will be disruptable as technology improves and shifts the competitive focus from a teacher’s credentials or an institution’s prestige to what students actually learn. their observations support the findings of other studies that indicate learning occurs best when it involves a blend of online and face to face learning, with the latter providing essential intangibles best obtained on a traditional college campus. from this statement, one can extrapolate that technology alone cannot ensure productive and enriched learning and, especially, personal and social development as students still need a human element in a technology enhanced environment. additionally, when planning to apply a new technology to education, we have to consider its potential pedagogic and psychological effects. finally, we need a solid, innovative, theoretical foundation for online learning. this foundation would help teachers do a better job in both classroom and online environments than simply integrating computers and other gadgets into learning. it would help enrich students’ otherwise almost entirely independent online experiences using only lms navigation as a gps in the world of knowledge with inspiring interaction with a live instructor, peers, and real life. as technology based education is unquestionably going to grow, we need to make it pedagogically, psychologically, and socially meaningful and effective. at the same time, we want to minimize its negative short  and long term consequences, which reaffirms the need for a comprehensive theory of technology based education and serious research. demand for online learning is largely driven by working adult students (wals) willing to have broad access to education and, at the same time, to accommodate learning to their busy lives, rather than by its effectiveness as a cognitive tool, which is determined by its most attractive feature   convenience (christensen and eyring, 2011; song et al., 2004). in studies of student satisfaction, students commonly rate their online experiences as satisfactory, with convenience being the most cited reason (cole et al., 2014). we observe students’ preference for convenience as a consumer strategy, and regrettably, not only in online higher education but across the whole educational system (kerby et al., 2014). convenience, along with comfort, helps reduce workload and complexity of learning, as well as the strain of face to face interaction with the class and instructor. it produces a sense of privacy and self satisfaction. it also generates a false perception that online learning is easier than learning in the classroom (aaron, 2007; westra, 2016), and often leads to online cheating (spalding, 2012). the convenience, like the happiness factor, however, means a less demanding and less rigorous school experience (zhao, 2012, p. 137). convenience can be a blessing for creative people, liberating them from the need to waste time and energy on trifles; however, it may also develop self gratification and laziness instead of struggling with obstacles and doing the hard job of digging in the knowledge mine. so, accessibility and, especially, convenience, enhanced by flexibility of the study schedule and comfortable learning environment of one’s office or bedroom are evidently the key factors of its popularity among students. the motto of online education, “any time, any place, any pace” is extremely seductive. yet, despite a number of studies showing that online learning is on a par with traditional, campus based learning (ni, 2013; wrenn, 2016), it is going to take more time and effort to really make online learning deliver outcomes comparable to the traditional classroom based, face to face education. mattan griffel, founder of “one month,” an online education startup, rethinks online education in the aftermath of the mooc explosion writing, “[online education] has kind of overstepped its current effectiveness, and everyone is saying what is possible by painting this picture, but the tools haven’t reached that point yet” (crichton, 2015). we know very well online education suffers from restricted interaction among students and with the instructor, is deficient of live collaboration, and lacks opportunities for relationships that take form in a study group. these collective relationships are crucial for individual success. productive online learning also depends on well developed learning, technology, critical thinking, research, and even reading and writing skills, as well as strong intrinsic motivation, perseverance, and self efficacy, which many students do not possess. finally, substituting real life objects and processes with virtual reality is not helpful in developing practical skills, which makes real world laboratory and experimental work less effective in virtual online environments. still, the question remains whether online education has helped improve teaching and learning. with the popularity of online education and enormous investment, do online college programs now prepare better specialists? have we achieved the result we had expected, besides widening access to education for working adult learners, formerly marginalized groups, such as disabled students and minorities, and people geographically separated from the learning centers, thus reaching multi million enrollment in online programs by 2016 and making sure that students enjoy convenience in their studies? innovative technology may bring performance enhancement in some ways but does not necessarily produce a direct benefit to education expressed by increased learning productivity. are the secondary benefits, like convenience or fun with technology, worthy of heavy investment? what, then, is needed to raise the quality of education? the real question here is, as always, do we control technology, or do we let ourselves be controlled by it and those who have created it? “choose the former,” writes an innovative author douglas rushkoff, “and you gain access to the control panel of civilization. choose the latter, and it could be the last real choice you get to make” (rushkoff, 2010). the raw powers of technology should be harnessed by sound pedagogy. pedagogy of online education is just being developed, after two decades of titanic effort (serdyukov, 2015a). online learning is a big business (stokes, 2012), which should be turned into a serious academic endeavor. when improving online learning, we should not narrow our innovative focus down to only technical solutions in all educational issues. we need to develop a broader look at all aspects of teaching and learning rather than trying to resolve problems and overcome barriers with technology alone. there are reasons for the discrepancy between the drive for educational innovation that we observe in some areas, great educational innovations of recent times, and the daily reality of the education system. first of all, if we look at the education holistically, as a complete system in charge of sustaining the nation’s need for educating society members and building their knowledge and expertise throughout their active lifetime, we have to acknowledge that all educational levels are interrelated and interdependent. moreover, education being a system itself is a component of a larger social supersystem, to which it links in many intricate and complicated ways. as a social institution, education reflects all the values, laws, principles, and traditions of the society to which it belongs. therefore, we need to regard education as a vital, complete, social entity and address its problems, taking into account these relations and dependencies both within the educational system and society. in turn, if the society supports innovations in education, then its educational system will continuously and effectively evolve and progress. if it does not, education will stagnate and produce mediocre outcomes. an example of negative socio cultural impact on education is mercantilism, which is destroying the ultimate purpose of education, and consumerism which is degrading institutions of higher education (feeman and thomas, 2005; ng and forbes, 2009; abeyta, 2013). other harmful social and cultural trends exert a powerful influence. these include monetization of education, entitlement, instant gratification, and egotism, which destroy education in general and the development of creativity and innovative spirit of students in particular (kerby et al., 2014). such grave societal issues must be dealt with forcefully. second, it is well known that higher education has been historically slow to adopt innovations for various reasons (hoffman and holzhuter, 2012; marcus, 2012; evans, 1970). because it is complex (due to cohesion and contuinuity of science) and labor intensive, higher education is particularly difficult to make more productive (brewer and tierney, 2012). secondary school is even more conservative than universities because they cater more and more to students’ well being and safety than to their preparation for real life and work (gibbons and silva, 2011). both secondary and higher education function as two separate and rather closed systems in their own rights. they are not only loosely connected to the wider world but also suffer from a wide disconnect between high school output measured in graduate learning outcomes and college entrance student expectations. it seems that “[…] the systems and values of industrial education were not designed with innovation and digital tools in mind. innovation, whether it is with technology, assessment or instruction, requires time and space for experimentation and a high tolerance for uncertainty. disruption of established patterns is the modus operandi of innovation. we like the fruits of innovation, but few of us have the mettle to run the gauntlet of innovation” (levasseur, 2012). it is paramount, nonetheless, to accept that “innovation is linked to creativity, risk taking, and experimentation” (brewer and tierney, 2012, p. 15), which must be a part of the education system. innovation is difficult to spread across school and academia because it disrupts the established routine and pushes implementers out of their comfort zone. terry heick writes that “[…] many k 12 schools give lip service to the concept of innovation in mission statements, on websites, in pds (professional development), and during committee, council, and board meetings, but lose their nerve when it’s time to make it happen. supporting something seen as secondary (innovation) in the face of pressure, far reaching programs, external standards ranging from common core to literacy, technology, and career readiness becomes a matter of priority and job security. while education begs for innovation, arguments against it often turn to tempting, straw man attacks” (heick, 2016). in many instances, innovation in educational institutions does not take priority over pressing routine issues   really, abiding by the state standards is more urgent. teachers and school administrators are commonly cautious about a threatening change and have little tolerance for the uncertainty that any major innovation causes. of course there are schools and even districts that are unafraid to innovate and experiment but their success depends on individual leaders and communities of educators who are able to create an innovative professional culture. pockets of innovation give hope but we need a total, massive support for innovations across society. third, one of the reasons for the slow pace of improvements in education is a sharp conflict between society’s welfare and political and business interests, as vividly illustrated when the nclb took us education on the path of rigid accountability. it was used by standardized testing companies to reap huge profits (or, may be, vice versa, these companies influenced ncbl). the trend stifled true education and produced unsatisfactory learning outcomes that changed the nature of teaching, narrowing the curriculum and limiting student learning. (national council of teachers of english, 2014; the national center for fair and open testing, 2012). fourth, even when an innovation comes to life, it is of little worth without implementation (csikszentmihalyi, 2013). innovation is not about talking the talk but walking the walk. moreover, an innovation can make a significant difference only when it is used on a wide scale. to create innovations is not enough, they need to be spread and used across schools and universities, a more difficult task. for the innovation to make a sizable effect, we need an army of implementers together with favorable conditions for the invention to spread and produce a result. implementers in turn have to be creative and motivated to do their job; they must also have freedom to innovate in the implementation, security on the job to take risks, and control of what they are doing. ultimately, they need be trusted (as are teachers in finland) to do their job right. in short, there must be an “innovation receiving system” (evans, 1970), or a “change zone” (polka and kardash, 2013). is this where one of the main problems of innovating lies? a growing trend in higher education is a market approach wherein the main goal is set for “meeting the demands of the student population that is learning   a life long population of learners” (afshar, 2016). universities today are busy innovating how to increase students’ satisfaction and create “exceptional,” “premier,” or “extraordinary” learning experiences rather than caring about their true knowledge and quality achievements. this is clearly an extension of the adaptive or differentiated approach to teaching and learning, thereby leading to customization of education (schuwer and kusters, 2014). but this view raises a question: are students’ demands and satisfaction the proper indicators of quality learning? when we began to be more concerned about how students feel in the classroom, what bothers them, and how best to accommodate them to make their learning experiences superior and anxiety free, we began to set aside the quality outcomes of the learning process. every cloud has a silver lining, fortunately. when market approach is applied to higher education, as it is in the current national and global competitive environment, the contest for enrollments increases and forces colleges to decrease attrition in all ways possible. this requires innovative approaches. the institutions that depend on enrollment for their revenue appear more willing to innovate than traditional, public universities that enjoy government support. “hence, innovation is likely to vary by several characteristics, including type of institution, institution size, market niche, and resources” (brewer and tierney, 2012, p. 22). clearly, private institutions are more adept at innovating than public ones. the market is a powerful factor, however, the changes it may bring have to be tackled cautiously. the hurdles to technology integration are described by peggy ertmer (1999) as external (first order) and internal (second order) barriers. the first order barriers are purely operational (technological), while the second order barriers are applicational (pedagogical). the difference in approaches to applying technology to teaching and learning (overcoming technological vs pedagogical barriers) might explain why huge investments in et have brought little if any effect to the quality of learning outcomes. last but not least, innovations grow in a favorable environment, which is cultivated by an educational system that promotes innovation at all levels and produces creative, critical thinking, self sufficient, life long learners, problem solvers, and workers. this system enjoys a stimulating research climate, encourages uplifting cultural attitudes toward education, and rallies massive societal support. the ultimate question is, what innovations do we really need, and what innovations might we not need? the finnish example can teach us a good lesson. pasi sahlberg identifies a set of reforms popular in many countries that finland has not adopted, including: standardization of curriculum enforced by frequent external tests; narrowing of the curriculum to basic skills in reading and mathematics; reduced use of innovative teaching strategies; adoption of educational ideas from external sources, rather than development of local internal capacity for innovation and problem solving; and adoption of high stakes accountability policies, featuring rewards and sanctions for students, teachers, and schools (sahlberg, 2010, p. 10). instead, the finns went their own, the finnish way, so profoundly described by pasi sahlberg in his bestselling book (sahlberg, 2011). so would it be innovative not to adopt some reforms? a big question now arises, what is then the american way to build innovative education? and what would be the global way? to create innovations, we need innovators, and many of them. but though innovation is often a spark originated in the mind of a bright person, it needs an environment that can nourish the fire. this environment is formed and fed by educational institutions, societal culture, and advanced economy. csikszentmihalyi underlines the importance of creating a stimulating macroenvironment, which integrates the social, cultural, and institutional context, and also microenvironment, the immediate setting in which a person works. “successful environment […] provide(s) freedom of action and stimulation of ideas, coupled with a respectful and nurturant attitude toward potential geniuses” (2013, p. 140). control over such an environment, he reasons, is in the educators’ hands. then, when the invention is created, it must fall into a fertile ground like a seed and be cultivated to grow and bring fruit. csikszentmihalyi writes, “creative ideas vanish unless there is a receptive audience to record and implement them […]. edison’s or einstein’s discoveries would be inconceivable without the prior knowledge, without the intellectual and social network that stimulated their thinking and without the social mechanisms that recognized and spread their innovations (2013, p. 6)”. the audience is not only the educators but also students, parents, policy makers, and all other members of society who act either as implementers or consumers of the innovation. coherent systemic support is essential for growing innovations. as the itl research project states, “important school level supports tend to be present in schools with higher concentrations of innovative teaching. based on survey data, in schools where teachers reported higher average levels of innovative teaching practices, they also tended to report […] a professional culture aligned to support innovation, reflection, and meaningful discourse about new teaching practices” (unesco, 2013). the oecd report on teaching practices and pedagogical innovation also argues that “teaching practices […] are factors affecting student learning that are more readily modifiable. moreover, additional professional practices have received attention, especially those that help transform the school into a professional learning community” (vieluf et al., 2012, p. 3). technology integration in education can be successful only when the human element is taken into consideration. this then integrates innovators, implementers, educational leadership, professional community and, certainly, the learners. walter polka and joseph kardash argue that the effectiveness of a computer innovation project they developed “[…] was facilitated by the school district leadership because of their focus on the ‘human side’ of change” (polka and kardash, 2013, p. 324). they found correlation between the implementation process employed in the district and the concepts associated with the three general need categories of innovation implementers: organizational needs, professional needs, and personal needs, which contributed to the innovation’s success. long lasting changes require “[…] a mixture of cultural and institutional changes, commitment from those within the program, and active and engaged leadership,” writes leticia de leόn, addressing technological innovations in higher education (de leόn, 2013, p. 347). when we try to innovate education, we often leave students out of the equation. we do not innovate in students’ learning, their mind, attitudes, behaviors, character, metacognition, and work ethics enough. yet, we try everything we can to improve teaching (delivery), while what we actually need is to improve learning. in education, nothing works if the students do not. according to the famous bulgarian scholar georgi lozanov (1988), learning is a matter of attitude, not aptitude. this is where the greatest potential for improving education lies. as a renowned cognitive scientist daniel willingham writes, “[…] education makes better minds, and knowledge of the mind can make better education” (willingham, 2010, p. 165). the most important goal, thus, should be not so much to learn stem but to cultivate innovative people in k 12, grow their autonomy, self efficiency, and foster an entrepreneurial mindset or “a critical mix of success oriented attitudes of initiative, intelligent risk taking, collaboration and opportunity recognition” (zhao, 2012, p. 5). to help develop new survival skills, effective communication and critical thinking skills, and nurture curious, creative, critical thinking, independent and self directed entrepreneurs, we must disrupt the ways of our school system and the ways our teachers are prepared. it may be worthwhile to extend the commonly used term “career readiness” to “life readiness.” research of exemplary educational systems across the world vividly demonstrates that teacher quality is the fundamental element of educational success: “it is especially teachers who shape students’ learning environments and help them reach their intellectual potential”: (vieluf et al., 2012, p. 113). teacher education and professional development are definitely one of the primary areas that call for innovative approaches: teachers must be taught to teach well (marcus, 2012). the “how” of the teaching (instructional methodology) is as important as the “what” (content) (morais et al., 2004). a great resource for effective education is the instructional design and methodology used by teachers, as shown by the itl research project: “across countries and classrooms, the characteristics of assigned classroom activities strongly predicted the 21st century skills that students exhibited in their work. students are much more likely to learn to solve real world problems and collaborate productively with their peers, for example, if their learning activities are carefully designed to offer opportunities for them to do these things. this finding suggests that professional development for innovative teaching might begin with lesson design” (unesco, 2013). teacher social status is one of the determining factors of the teacher quality. teachers’ status in the most advanced countries like finland, singapore, south korea, and japan is very high. it reflects the quality of teaching and learning and also the level of pedagogic innovations. in our drive to enhance educational innovation, empowering school teachers and college instructors may be the most important task. mattan griffel writes, “we need to change the role of teachers. what kind of people do we consider teachers? how do we elevate teachers in society?” (crichton, 2015). he believes we have to make them “rock stars” and bring new perspectives into the profession. eventually, the most recognized pathway to education innovation, writes shelton, is “[…] basic and applied research […] with more and better leveraged resources, more focus, and more discipline, this pathway can accelerate our understanding of teaching and learning and production of performance enhancing practices and tools” (shelton, 2011). research focusing on raising productivity and efficiency and improving the quality of learning has to increase in all critical areas of education. one crucial indicator of educational effectiveness is measuring the quality of learning that remains imperfect. “the lack of good measures has severely limited the degree to which market forces can discipline the provision of educational quality” (massy, 2012). developing clear and effective measures of educational quality is an important venue for future innovative research. societal support for innovative education and building up a new culture of educational preeminence both inside the education system and around it is paramount for its success. brunner (1996) suggests viewing education in a broader context of what society intends to accomplish through its educational investment in the young. the best way to achieve superior education is to shape a new educational culture. as pasi sahlberg explains, “we are creating a new culture of education, and there is no way back” (sahlberg, 2011, p. 2). innovation can be presented as a model in the context of its effects on the quality of teaching and learning within an educational environment, which is permeated by professional and societal cultures (figure 1). americans’ love affair with the car extends to computers, iphones, and the internet. therefore, innovations in education focus primarily on technology and technology applications. technocentrists want to see education more automated, more technology enhanced, and more technology controlled in the hope of making education more effective. the way of doing so would be through more sophisticated lms’s, automated analytics, customization, or individualization of learning and developing the student as an avid consumer of digital information. while we realize there is no stopping the technological revolution, we educators must do all we can to preserve the primary mission of education, which is reflected in a humanistic approach that caters to the whole person wherein efforts are made to develop a free, independent, critical thinking, active, and effective thinker, doer, citizen, and worker. educational innovations embrace both views, interacting and enriching each other for society’s common good. along with developing our own innovations and creating a broad base for implementation, it might be useful to look outside the box. as the world becomes more and more globalized, national education systems are shedding their uniqueness and gaining a more universal, homogeneous look (e.g. the bologna process, which has brought 50 national higher education systems to a common denominator in europe and beyond) (bologna process, 2016). scholars indicate there is “[…] the need for us universities to keep up with the rest of the world in today’s highly competitive educational marketplace” (wildavsky et al., 2012, p. 1). it is also economically and culturally beneficial to learn from each other in the spirit of global cooperation and share one’s achievements with others. while in the context of globalization it may be convenient to have a common education system across the world, however, to satisfy the needs and expectations of the nation state it is necessary to continue innovating within one’s own system. the rich international educational palette offers unique solutions to many issues facing us schools and universities. what attractive innovative approaches exist in the world that could be applied to the us education system? to mention just a few, the confucian culture of appreciating education in china, japan, south korea, and other south east asian nations which brings students’ and parents’ positive and respectful societal attitudes toward education and educators; cultural transformation in education and quality teacher preparation in finland, singapore, and shanghai; organizational innovations in schools of ontario, canada. in finland, a new ecosystem for learning was created (niemi et al., 2014). singapore, for one, has become one of the top scoring countries on the pisa tests by cultivating strong school leadership, committing to ongoing professional development, and exploring innovative models, like its tech infused future schools (edutopia, 2012b). in shanghai, china, every low performing school is assigned a team of master teachers and administrators to provide weekly guidance and mentorship on everything from lesson plans to school culture (editopia, 2012a). the list of international innovations to cogitate is, fortunately, extensive. is this what our educational innovators could do something about? daniel willingham demonstrates a very interesting angle in international education that substantially differs from ours: “in china, japan and other eastern countries, intelligence is more often viewed as malleable. if students fail a test or don’t understand a concept, it’s not that they are stupid   they just haven’t worked hard enough yet. this attribution is helpful to students because it tells them that intelligence is under their control. if they are performing poorly, they can do something about it […] children do differ in intelligence, but intelligence can be changed through sustained hard work” (willingham, 2010, p. 131). there are numerous exciting foreign examples for the us educators to learn from and innovate, implementing and adapting them to us schools. many us educators certainly learn from advanced nations’ educational experiences (darling hammond, 2010; stewart, 2012), but these innovations find a hard way into the school system. a right step in this direction is to integrate global education ideas into teacher preparation programs. a worthy case of opening up a wide world of global education to us teachers and developing outside the box thinking is a new specialization in the master of arts in teaching program, “u.s. education in global context” which has been offered at national university since 2014. the principal focus of this specialization is on advanced, innovative, and effective international approaches, ideas, and strategies in teaching and learning that address the needs of the nation and create contemporary school environments to accommodate diverse student populations. specialization’s goals and objectives are designed to help students develop the knowledge, competencies, skills, and dispositions required of a globally competent citizen and world class educator. focusing on the universal need for continuous improvement in teaching and learning, this specialization provides students with a balance of philosophy and theory, practice and application through collaborative research projects and field based activities. the ultimate outcome of the four course specialization is an innovative, practical implementation project to apply in the candidates’ schools. the finns, singaporeans, south koreans, hong kongers, and citizens of other nations consider education the best way to improve their country’s economy, and it has worked. an even more remarkable consequence has been a change to their national cultures. this provides a worthy example for other nations, including ours. to sum up, we need to create favorable conditions for growing our own innovations, while taking advantage of the best international theories and practices. you don’t have the time, you make the time (thorin klosowski). among many points for educational innovations time definitely deserves close attention. time is a significant factor in education. attempts to save time on learning and raise its productivity are well known to each of us. to increase learning efficiency using so called accelerated and intensive approaches is a promising path for innovation. these two approaches demonstrate the difference between evolutionary and revolutionary disruptive approaches. innovation, as we know, can be called to life by social, political, or professional factors but the strongest is definitely economic. a flat world (friedman, 2005) means global competition, faster production cycles, and more to keep up with. time is speeding up. requirements for workers are rapidly mounting in industry and business due to swiftly changing technologies and fierce international competition. it is impractical to spend a third of one’s active lifetime attending secondary school and college learning in advance what may not be useful on the job in the next 10 to 15 years because manufacturing, technology, and business will completely change. additionally, the cost of a college education is rising faster than inflation, though the outcomes are disproportionate to this rise: “[…] tuition has increased faster than inflation, without a comparable increase in the quality or results” (brewer and tierney, 2012, p. 13). if you ask students what worries them most, it is the cost of the next course and its value for their future job. education has become more expensive and less affordable for many people. this also creates a heavy burden on the state’s budget. therefore, educators need to find ways to make education more time and cost efficient (hjeltnes and hansson, 2005). we can identify two possible roads to take. the first is to increase revenue, and this is what the majority of colleges and universities are doing. raising tuition, however, has its limits; government support is drying out. cutting costs, on the other hand, may undermine some essential aspects of higher education. the second road is to increase learning productivity defined as the output (learning outcomes measured in certain units) per dollar or per time unit (academic year, semester, month, week, day, or hour). the former can be used to compute cost efficiency, while the latter will help to define time efficiency. time efficiency and cost efficiency of education are evidently interrelated. the most obvious source of enhancing educational productivity is integration of ict; however, there are other ways. time is the most precious of commodities, especially for wals. our own survey of national university students who take accelerated programs, which allow them to graduate sooner than in conventional programs, shows that time is paramount when selecting their learning program (serdyukov et al., 2003). when asked what is more important for them, the cost of the program or the time spent learning, 88 percent of surveyed wals stated that time was more important, and they were willing to pay more for a shorter program of the same quality. so accelerated programs are often more competitive than the conventional extended ones. serdyukov and serdyukova (2012) posit that time efficiency of the learning process is a decisive factor in assessing a program or a course. in their opinion, colleges and universities, which are now evaluated based upon the quality of their education, will soon be selected and valued based on the time needed for the learning to take place. in the same way, programs that cost less will be more competitive than those that cost more. with education budgets decreasing and numbers of learners taking part in education increasing, time and cost efficiency will play an increasing role in determining a program’s, and thus an institution’s, value. when considering time investment, instructional activities are basically concerned with either learning more in the same time (i.e. growth in learning outcomes without increasing learning time) or learning the same amount of information in less time (decreasing learning time or compressing the course). as serdyukov and serdyukova (2006) write: “can we, the educators, teach more effectively; can students learn more, better and in less time?” (p. 255). the answer to this question can have profound social, economic and personal significance as it may affect a learner’s career and lifestyle, societal attitude toward education, the rate of investment in education, and eventually the nation’s well being (barbera et al., 2015). consideration of time investment in learning coupled with recent innovations in cognitive psychology and et is what brought to life accelerated and intensive programs. various approaches and methodologies for providing faster and shorter education without compromising academic quality have been described in the literature (scott and conrad, 1992; rose and nicholl, 1997; bowling et al., 2002; serdyukov, 2008). they are grounded in the newest brain research in the cognitive and emotional potential of learners (lozanov, 1978, 1988; kitaigorodskaya, 1995), innovative approaches to teaching and learning that use nontraditional organizational forms, techniques and processes (boyes et al., 2004; serdyukov et al., 2003), et applications, and even fancy programs of learning during sleep (ostrander and schroeder, 2000). the most popular approaches are accelerated learning (al) programs, which use a compressed, short term course format, and intensive learning (il) programs, which employ specially organized course structure, visuals, music, and suggestive techniques to open up students’ intellectual and sensitive capacities, thereby contributing to more effective learning. accelerated and intensive programs can significantly shorten the duration of the learning measured in class hours, days, weeks, or semesters. in some cases, they can also increase learning outcomes measured in the volume of knowledge constructed or skill sets learned in a given time. (serdyukov, 2008). a conventional semester model of college education may not suit a new generation of wals who take school part time and need to speed up learning to obtain employable competencies and skills. the al model delivers a semester program in a shorter period of time than the conventional program model but with the comparable results. national university, for example, offers undergraduate and graduate level programs using a nontraditional, accelerated 1×1 model of instruction (one month long, one course at a time) for adult learners (serdyukov et al., 2003). onsite classes usually meet two evening sessions per week for four and a half hour each; in some cases, there are two additional saturday morning sessions of the same duration. thus, each course runs for eight evenings with one saturday morning final session for graduate programs (totaling 40.5 hours) or two saturday sessions for undergraduate programs (totaling 45 hours). similar models are used by such schools as cornell college, colorado college, devry university, northeast university, grand canyon university, tusculum university, and colorado state university global. online courses also run for four weeks but instead of face to face classroom sessions students participate in threaded discussions (one or two per week), view live videoconferencing sessions (one per week), carry out weekly written assignments, develop projects, and in some courses complete mandatory field activities (e.g. teacher preparation programs require school visits for observing and teaching lessons). the sequential approach when students take one course after another allows for more accumulated and integrated learning experiences. besides, according to the student survey (serdyukov et al., 2003), this 1×1 format helps to unshackle students’ minds and focus their attention and energy on a single subject. it can also make it easier to adapt to the same teaching/learning style in this instructional model. the advantages observed for the sequential model appear to occur because the more intense, consecutive instruction reduces the number of distractions in the students’ lives, thus allowing for more focused attention and ultimately creating a more effective learning environment. csikszentmihalyi’s (1982) research suggests that “deep concentration,” “immersion” in an activity, and “undivided intentionality” lead to increasingly rewarding “optimal experiences” which nourish and strengthen the self. he also comments that “optimal experience stands out against this background of humdrum everyday life by excluding the noise that interferes with it in normal existence” (p. 22). this becomes evident when we consider the working adult’s hectic life and complicated everyday experiences. scott and conrad (1992) state that “concentrated study may cultivate skills and understandings which will remain untapped and undeveloped under the traditional system” (p. 417). therefore, learning only one content area at a time has become one of the crucial factors of al. the intensive approach, a superior level of al, has been used in many countries primarily for foreign language education, probably the most time consuming didactic endeavor. one indicator of how efficiently a student has learned a foreign language is the number of words learned, retained, and correctly used in communication, both in oral and written speech (reading and writing). according to research (longman dictionary of contemporary english, 2007), a person needs to know and be able to use two to three thousand words in a foreign language for basic communication. these so called communicative skills can be assessed by the ability of the learner to accomplish a communication task in certain communicative situations. duration of the study course at this level in a conventional institution can reach 200 300 hours. at a rate of two hours a week, the course duration may extend to 100 or more weeks (two years). when an innovative, intensive instructional methodology, such as suggestopedia (lozanov, 1978; kitaigorodskaya, 1995; rose and nicholl, 1997), is used to teach a foreign language, the learning efficiency significantly rises, and the course duration with the same outcomes can be reduced by approximately 50 percent, as compared to a conventional college course. for instance, an initial intensive course can take up to 100 to 150 hours. the course is usually taught with higher frequency and longer lessons (usually four to five hours, two to three or more times a week). thus, a complete course of study may be completed only in ten weeks (2.5 months). so time efficiency (et) of an intensive foreign language course in the number of hours (t) is of the order of 2 (200 hours of a conventional course (c) divided by 100 hours of an intensive course (i)): time efficiency of the same intensive course in the number of weeks is of the order of 10: duration of a conventional course (dc) (100 weeks) divided by the duration of an intensive course (di) (ten weeks): this is a case of disruptive, revolutionary innovation that produces a radical transformation in foreign language learning where learners achieve course goals and objectives in half the study hours and one tenth of a typical course duration. this approach, which was extremely popular in eastern europe (bulgaria, soviet union) in the 1980s and 1990s, was to a larger extent inspired by the rise of the iron curtain and prospective emigration to the west. some variations or similar approaches emerged later in germany, england, japan, and the usa (rose and nicholl, 1997). why it was not recognized and did not spread throughout us schools and colleges may be partially due to a lack of need (english is spoken worldwide). in addition, it is labor intensive and demands high level teacher qualifications (special preparation, dedication, excellent dispositions, inventiveness, and very hard work in the class). in addition, it must be taught in specially designed and equipped classrooms. finally, it depends on students’ elevated intrinsic motivation, work ethic, trust and respect for the teacher, and perseverance, though for a limited time. both accelerated and intensive short term courses demand highly efficient planning, organization, and management of the instructional process. furthermore, to ensure efficient course delivery, innovative methods and technologies are required for effective presentation, processing, skill development, and real life applications. many accomplishments in al and il methodologies, incidentally, can be used to teach other than foreign language programs. we formulated ten major principles that create the foundation of il: learner centered approach; specific structure and organization of the course and its content for consistent, “whole” student experience; effective content presentation in various formats and modalities; immediate application of new knowledge in authentic situations in the class and real life, and gaining practical outcomes of the course; iterative process of knowledge construction and skill development (serdyukov and ryan, 2008); situated learning (lave and wenger, 1991) that uses real life situations as the basis of learning activities and, especially, in developing professional competence; continuous active communication, collaboration, and cooperation among students in various small  and big group activities; high level of intrinsic motivation developed and constantly supported through emotional involvement of each student in team work and learning process; instructor’s suggestive, supportive, and efficient teaching style incorporating incessant involvement with the class; immediate, objective, and stimulating feedback; continuous student support; systemic use of et in classroom and homework both for content acquisition and skill development, for communication and collaboration, and for maintaining students’ high level of cognitive, physical, and emotional state; application of suggestive techniques, such as relaxation, ritual structure of classroom activities, positive environment, emotional involvement, and music; and combination of intensive work and total relaxation. this approach is rooted in consistent, systemic application of all these principles. the formula for il is as follows: the more organized and efficient the instructional system, the more focused the student, the more effort is produced, the better the effect of learning, the faster the rate of learning, and the shorter the process duration (serdyukov and serdyukova, 2006). this is why all accelerated and intensive courses are always short (two weeks to 1 2 months long). if no significant effort is applied to learning, then there is no effect, no increase in productivity, and consequently, no opportunity to shorten the duration of the course. so, accelerated programs that speed up learning by compressing the course duration, while requiring the same number of hours for the same learning outcomes, are an evolutionary innovation. intensive programs that provide better outcomes in a considerably shorter time are a revolutionary innovation. we can state now that when an innovation ensures significantly better outcomes and saves on cost or time by at least an order of 2 (100 percent) or more, we can call it a revolutionary innovation. measuring time in learning can be instrumental for increasing its productivity. learning to manage time productively is especially acute for independent learners and online students for whom effective time management is a well known issue. therefore, teachers need be taught to use time effectively. in teacher preparation programs, for instance, we recommend that teachers use time estimates when planning lessons (serdyukov and ryan, 2008; fea, 2016). thus, making learning more time and cost efficient offers a promising venue for further innovations. us education desperately needs effective innovations of scale that can help produce high quality learning outcomes across the system and for all students. we can start by intensifying our integration of successful international learning models and creating conditions in our schools and colleges that foster and support innovators and educational entrepreneurs, or edupreneurs (tait and faulkner, 2016). moreover, these transformations should be varied, yet systematic, targeting different vital aspects of education. deep, multifaceted, and comprehensive innovations, both tangible and intangible, have the capacity to quickly generate scalable effects. radically improving the efficiency and quality of teaching and learning theory and practice, as well as the roles of the learner, teacher, parents, community, society, and society’s culture should be the primary focus of these changes. other promising approaches should seek to improve students’ work ethic and attitudes toward learning, their development of various learning skills, as well as making learning more productive. we also have to bring all grades, from preschool to higher and postgraduate levels, into one cohesive system. as the price of education, especially at colleges and universities, continues to rise, cost and time efficiency of learning, effective instructional approaches, and methods and tools capable of fulfilling the primary mission of education all will become critical areas of research and inventive solutions. colleges and universities must concentrate on expanding the value of education, maximizing the productivity of learning, correlating investments with projected outcomes, and improving cost and time efficiency. whatever technologies we devise for education, however much technology we integrate into learning, the human element, particularly the learner and teacher, remains problematic. so, while taking advantage of effective educational technologies, we must situate those modern tools within a wider context of human education in order to preserve its humanistic, developmental purpose and, thus, make more effective use of them. computers for schools are ready, but are we ready? our understanding of how students learn and how teachers teach and craft their methodology in technology based environments remains lacking. questions to ask are whether current methods help increase learning productivity, and as a result, time and cost efficiency. all technology applications require a solid theoretical foundation based on purposeful, systemic research and sound pedagogy to increase efficiency and decrease possible side issues. when integrating novel technologies in teaching and learning, we must first consider their potential applicability, anticipated costs and benefits, and then develop successful educational practices. therefore, the key to a prosperous, inventive society is a multidimensional approach to revitalizing the educational system (structures, tools, and stake holders) so that it breeds learners’ autonomy, self efficacy, critical thinking, creativity, and advances a common culture that supports innovative education. in order to succeed, innovative education must become a collective matter for all society for which we must generate universal public responsibility. otherwise, all our efforts to build an effective educational system will fail. model of educational innovation aaron, s. (2007), “an insider’s look at online learning”, teaching community, available at: http://teaching.monster.com/education/articles/1599 an insiders look at online learning?print=true (accessed september 3, 2016). abeyta, e. (2013), “lifelong customers: the response to student consumerism”, the evolllution, available at: http://evolllution.com/opinions/lifelong customers response student consumerism/ (accessed september 10, 2016). accuosti, j. (2014), “factors affecting education technology success”, asee 2014 zone i conference, april 3 5, available at: www.asee.org/documents/zones/zone1/2014/ student/pdfs/112.pdf afshar, v. (2016), “disrupting higher education”, a blog, the huffington post, august 5,available at: www.huffingtonpost.com/vala afshar/disrupting higher educati_b_11341146.html? baer, l. and mccormick, j. (2012), “building the capacity for change through innovation”, in hoffman, a. and spangehl, s. (eds), innovation in higher education: igniting the spark for success, american council on education, rowman&litttlefield publishers inc., lanham, md, pp. 165 181. barbera, e., gros, b. and kirschner, p. (2015), “paradox of time in research on educational technology”, time & society 2015, vol. 24 no. 1, pp. 96 108, available at: http://tas.sagepub.com/content/24/1/96.refs (accessed august 13, 2016). bok, d. (2007), our underachieving colleges, princeton university press, princeton, nj, p. 6. bologna process (2016), “european higher education area and bologna process”, available at: www.ehea.info/ (accessed may 28, 2016). bowling, n., ries, k. and ivanitskaya, l. (2002), “how effective are compressed courses?”, on target, vol. 1 no. 3, pp. 3 7, available at: www.cel.cmich.edu/ontarget/aug02/ (accessed april 1, 2012). boyes, l., reid, i., brain, k. and wilson, j. (2004), accelerated learning: a literature survey, unit for educational research & evaluation, university of bradford, bradford, available at: www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/giftedandtalented/downloads/word/accellearnreport.doc (accessed april 1, 2006). brewer, d. and tierney, w. (2012), “barriers to innovation in the us education”, in wildavsky, b., kelly, a. and carey, k. (eds), reinventing higher education: the promise of innovation, harvard education press, cambridge, ma, pp. 11 40. brunner, j. (1996), the culture of education, harvard university press, cambridge, ma. brynjolfsson, e. (1993), “the productivity paradox of information technology: review and assessment”, communications of the acm, vol. 36 no. 12, pp. 67 77. business dictionary (2016), “definition of the term ‘intangible asset’”, available at: www.businessdictionary.com/definition/intangible asset.html (accessed november 11, 2016). camins, a. (2015), “what’s the purpose of education in the 21st century?”, washington post’ education blog, the answer sheet, february 12, available at: www.arthurcamins.com/?p=319 (accessed october 14, 2016). christensen, c. and eyring, h. (2011), the innovative university: changing the dna of higher education from the inside out, jossey bass, san francisco, ca. christensen, c. and overdorf, m. (2000), “meeting the challenge of disruptive change”, harvard business review, vol. 2 no. 78, pp. 47 76. cole, m., shelley, d. and swartz, l. (2014), “online instruction, e learning, and student satisfaction: a three year study”, the international review of research in open and distance learning, vol. 13 no. 6, available at: www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1748/3123 (accessed july 22, 2016). cornali, f. (2012), “effectiveness and efficiency of educational measures”, evaluation practices, indicators and rhetoric, vol. 2 no. 3, pp. 255 260, available at: www.scirp.org/journal/sm creating innovators (2012), “america’s last competitive advantage”, available at: http://creatinginnovators.com/ (accessed september 28, 2016). crichton, d. (2015), “searching for the next wave of education innovation”, techcrunch, available at: https://techcrunch.com/2015/06/27/education next wave/ (accessed september 23, 2016). csikszentmihalyi, m. (1982), “toward a psychology of optimal experiences”, review of personality and social psychology, no. 3, pp. 13 36. csikszentmihalyi, m. (2013), creativity: the psychology of discovery and invention, harperperennial, new york, ny. cuban, l. (2015), “larry cuban on school reform and classroom practice: the lack of evidence based practice: the case of classroom technology”, available at: https://larrycuban.wordpress.com/2015/02/05/the lack of evidence based practice the case of classroom technology part 1/ (accessed august 29, 2016). darling hammond, l. (2010), the flat world and education: how america’s commitment to equity will determine our future, teachers college press, new york, ny. de leόn, l. (2013), “managing technological innovation and issues of licensing in higher education”, in ran, b. (ed.), the dark side of technological innovation, information age publishing, charlotte, nc, pp. 347 371. diamond, j. (2005), collapse: how societies choose to fail or succeed, penguin book, new york, ny. editopia (2012a), “shanghai”, george lucas educational foundation, available at: www.edutopia.org/education everywhere international shanghai china video edutopia (2012b), “singapore”, george lucas educational foundation, available at: www.edutopia.org/education everywhere international singapore video ertmer, p. (1999), “addressing first  and second order barriers to change: strategies for technology integration”, educational technology research and development, vol. 47 no. 4, pp. 47 61, available at: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/bf02299597 evans, r. and leppmann, p. (1970), resistance to innovation in higher education, jossey bass publishers inc., san francisco, ca. extreme learning (2012), available at: www.extreme learning.org/ (accessed september 22, 2016). fea (2016), “time on task: a strategy that accelerates learning”, feaweb, available at: https://feaweb.org/time on task a teaching strategy that accelerates learning (accessed august 9, 2016). feeman, i. and thomas, m. (2005), “consumerism in education: a comparison between canada and the united kingdom”, international journal of educational management, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 153 177, available at: www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/09513540510582444 friedman, t. (2005), the world is flat: a brief history of the twenty first century, farrar, straus and giroux, new york, ny. friedman, g. (2012), the next decade: empire and republic in a changing world, anchor books, new york, ny. fullan, m. (2007), leading in a culture of change, jossey bass, san francisco, ca. fullan, m. (2010), all systems go: the change imperative for whole system reform, corwin, newbury park, ca. gibbons, s. and silva, o. (2011), “school quality, child well being and parents’ satisfaction”, economics of education review, vol. 30 no. 2, pp. 312 331. groom, j. and lamb, b. (2014), “reclaiming innovation”, educause review, vol. 49 no. 3, available at: www.educause.edu/visuals/shared/er/extras/2014/reclaiminginnovation/default.html hargreaves, a. (2003), teaching in the knowledge society: education in the age of insecurity, teachers college press, new york, ny. hargreaves, a. and shirley, d. (2009), the fourth way: the inspiring future of educational change, corwin, thousand oaks, ca. hargreaves, a., lieberman, a., fullan, m. and hopkins, d. (eds) (2010), second international handbook of educational change, springer, new york, ny. heick, t. (2016), “12 barriers to innovation in education”, teachthought. available at: www.teachthought.com/the future of learning/disruption innovation/12 barriers innovation education/ (accessed august 12, 2016). hjeltnes, t. and hansson, b. (2005), “cost effectiveness and cost efficiency in e learning”, the tisip foundation, trondheim, available at: www2.tisip.no/quis/public_files/wp7 cost effectiveness efficiency.pdf (accessed september 29, 2016). hoffman, a. and holzhuter, j. (2012), “the evolution of higher education: innovation as natural selection”, in hoffman, a. and spangehl, s. (eds), innovation in higher education: igniting the spark for success, american council on education, rowman & litttlefield publishers inc., lanham, md, pp. 3 15. huffington post (2012), “college preparedness lacking, forcing students into developmental coursework, prompting some to drop out”, huffington post, june 6, available at: www.huffingtonpost.com/ 2012/06/18/students lacking college _n_1606201.html (accessed may 1, 2015). jaschik, s. (2015), “well prepared in their own eyes”, inside higher, available at: www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/01/20/study finds big gaps between student and employer perceptions (accessed august 25, 2016). jiang, l. (2015), “why education innovation is the most important thing you could pursue”, getting smart, available at: http://gettingsmart.com/2015/04/why education innovation is the most important thing you could pursue/ (accessed july 18, 2016). kerby, m., branham, k. and mallinger, g. (2014), “consumer based higher education: the uncaring of learning”, journal of higher education theory and practice, vol. 14 no. 5, pp. 42 54, available at: www.na businesspress.com/jhetp/kerbymb_web14_5_.pdf kitaigorodskaya, g. (1995), intensive foreign language teaching: history, current status and future trends, mgu, moscow (in russian). lave, j. and wenger, e. (1991), situated learning. legitimate peripheral participation, university of cambridge press, cambridge. levasseur, a. (2012), “does our current education system support innovation?”, mindshift, july 17, available at: ww2.kqed.org/mindshift/2012/07/17/does our current education system support innovation/ (accessed september 21, 2016). longman dictionary of contemporary english (2007), longman communication 3000, pearson longman elt, white plains, ny. lozanov, g. (1978), suggestology and outlines of suggestopedy, gordon and breach science pub, new york, ny. lozanov, g. (1988), the foreign language teacher’s suggestopedic manual, routledge, london. marcus, j. (2012), “old school: four hundred years of resistance to change”, in wildavsky, b., kelly, a. and carey, k. (eds), reinventing higher education: the promise of innovation, harvard education press, cambridge, ma, pp. 41 72. massy, w. (2012), “creative paths to boosting academic productivity”, in wildavsky, b., kelly, a. and carey, k. (eds), reinventing higher education: the promise of innovation, harvard education press, cambridge, ma, pp. 73 100. massy, w. and zemsky, r. (1995), using information technology to enhance academic productivity, educom, washington, dc, available at: http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/html/nli0004.html (accessed september 24, 2016). matthew, m. (ed.) (1964), innovation in education, teachers college press, new york, ny. maurer, h., mehmood, r. and korica pehserl, p. (2013), “how dangerous is the web for creative work?”, journal of computing and information technology, vol. 21 no. 2, pp. 59 69. mercurio, z. (2016), “how college kills purpose”, the huffington post, may 24, available at: www.huffingtonpost.com/zach mercurio/how college kills purpose_b_10013944.html meyer, a., rose, d. and gordon, d. (2014), universal design of learning: theory and practice, cast professional publishing, wakefield, ma. morais, a., neves, i. and pires, d. (2004), “the what and the how of teaching and learning: going deeper into sociological analysis and intervention”, in muller, j., davies, b. and morais, a. (eds), thinking with bernstein, working with bernstein, routledge, london. national council of teachers of english (2014), “how standardized tests shape   and limit   student learning: a policy research brief produced by the national council of teachers of english”, available at: www.ncte.org/library/nctefiles/resources/journals/cc/0242 nov2014/cc0242policystandardized.pdf (accessed september 9, 2016). national educational technology standards (2004), iste, available at: http://ced.ncsu.edu/techcomps/unets5.html (accessed march 12, 2013). ni, a. (2013), “comparing the effectiveness of classroom and online learning: teaching research methods”, journal of public affairs education, vol. 1 no. 19, pp. 199 215. nickols, m. (2011), “articulating e pedagogy for education. open learning for an open world”, in barrett, j. (ed.), reflections on open and distance learning and teaching at the open polytechnic of new zealand, lower hutt, pp. 321 336. niemi, h., multisilta, j., lipponen, l. and vivitsou, m. (eds) (2014), finnish innovations and technologies in schools: a guide towards new ecosystems of learning, sense publishers, university of helsinki, rotterdam, available at: www.cicero.fi/files/cicero/site/2121 finnish innovations and technologies in schools_toc.pdf (accessed october 2, 2016). ng, i. and forbes, j. (2009), “education as service: the understanding of university experience through service logic”, journal of marketing for higher education, vol. 19 no. 1, pp. 38 64. oecd (2014), measuring innovation in education: a new perspective, oecd publishing, paris, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264215696 en (accessed august 30, 2016). office of innovation and improvement (2016), “us department of education”, available at: http://innovation.ed.gov/ (accessed september 1, 2016). okpara, f. (2007), “the value of creativity and innovation in entrepreneurship”, journal of asia entrepreneurship and sustainability, vol. iii no. 2, pp. 2 14, available at: www.asiaentrepreneurshipjournal.com/ajesiii2okpara.pdf osolind, k. (2012), “revolutionary vs evolutionary innovation”, reinvention consulting, available at: www.reinventioninc.com/revolutionvsevolution (accessed october 16, 2016). ostrander, s. and schroeder, l. (2000), superlearning: new triple fast ways you can learn, earn, and succeed in the 21st century, delacorte press, new york, ny. pappert, s. (1990), “a critique of technocentrism in thinking about the school of the future”, available at: www.papert.org/articles/acritiqueoftechnocentrism.html (accessed december 25, 2015). pew research center (2015), “us students improving   slowly   in math and science, but still lagging internationally”, pew research center, february 2, available at: www.pewresearch.org/fact tank/2015/02/02/u s students improving slowly in math and science but still lagging internationally/ (accessed july 27, 2016). polka, w. and kardash, j. (2013), “managing in the effective change zone to implement a ‘1 to 1’ laptop program in a rural school district”, in ran, b. (ed.), the dark side of technological innovation, information age publishing, charlotte, nc, pp. 323 346. postman, n. (1993), technopoly: the surrender of culture to technology, vintage books, new york, ny. robinson, k. (2015), creative schools: the grassroots revolution that’s transforming education, viking press, new york, ny. rose, c. and nicholl, m.j. (1997), accelerated learning for the 21st century. the six step plan to unlock your master mind, dell publishing, new york, ny. rubin, c. (2015), “the global search for education: united states and finland   why are they so great?”, the huffington post, february 6, available at: www.huffingtonpost.com/c m rubin/the global search for edu_b_6992056.html (accessed july 19, 2016). rushkoff, d. (2010), program or be programmed. ten commands for a digital age, or books, new york, ny. sahlberg, p. (2010), “educational change in finland”, in hargreaves, a., lieberman, a., fullan, m. and hopkins, d. (eds), second international handbook of educational change, springer, new york, ny, pp. 323 348. sahlberg, p. (2011), finnish lessons: what can the world learn from educational change in finland, teachers college, columbia university, new york, ny. schuwer, b. and kusters, b. (2014), “mass customization of education by an institution of he: what can we learn from industry?”, the international review of research in open and distributed learning, vol. 12 no. 2. science watch (2009), “top 20 countries in all fields”, science watch, clarivate analytics, philadelphia, pa, available at: http://archive.sciencewatch.com/dr/cou/2009/09decall/ (accessed august 6, 2016). scott, p. and conrad, c. (1992), “a critique of intensive courses and an agenda for research”, higher education: handbook of theory and research, agathon press, new york, ny, pp. 411 459. serdiukov, p. (2001), “models of distance higher education: fully automated or partially human?”, educational technology review. international journal on educational technology issues & applications, vol. 9 no. 1, pp. 15 25. serdyukov, p. (2008), “accelerated learning: what is it?”, journal of research in innovative teaching, vol. 1 no. 1, pp. 36 59. serdyukov, p. (2015a), “does online education need a special pedagogy?”, journal of computing and information technology, vol. 23 no. 1, pp. 61 74, available at: http://cit.srce.unizg.hr/index.php/cit/article/view/2511 serdyukov, p. (2015b), “paradox of teacher and student in online education and societal culture”, proceedings of global learn 2015. association for the advancement of computing in education (aace), pp. 713 723. serdyukov, p. and ryan, m. (2008), writing effective lesson plans: the 5 star approach, allyn&bacon, boston, ma. serdyukov, p. and serdyukova, n. (2006), “innovative approaches in technology based education: accelerated and intensive learning”, proceedings of the ninth iasted international conference on computers and advanced technology in education, cate 2006, lima, october 4 6, pp. 45 50. serdyukov, p. and serdyukova, n. (2012), “time as factor of success in online learning”, journal of information technology and application in education, vol. 1 no. 2, pp. 40 46, available at: www.jitae.org/paperinfo.aspx?id=1203 serdyukov, p., subbotin, i. and serdyukova, n. (2003), “accessible, convenient and efficient education for working adults in a shorter time: is it possible?”, cael forum and news, vol. 26 no. 3, pp. 24 28. sharratt, l. and harild, g. (2015), good to great to innovate: recalculating the route to career readiness, k 12+, corwin, thousand oaks, ca. shelton, j. (2011), “education innovation: what it is and why we need more of it”, education week, sputnik post, september 28, available at: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/sputnik/2011/09/education_innovation_what_it_is_and_why_we_need_more_of_it.html (accessed september 16, 2016). song, l.s., singleton, e., hill, j. and koh, m. (2004), “improving online learning: student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics”, internet and higher education, pp. 59 70. sousa, d. (2014), how the brain learns mathematics, korwin, thousand oaks, ca. spalding, e. (2012), claire fox: is consumerism bad for education? liberty world press, available at: http://libertyuom.wordpress.com/2012/04/30/claire fox is consumerism bad for education/ (accessed september 12, 2016). spangehl, s. and hoffman, a. (2012), “perspectives on innovation”, in hoffman, a. and spangehl, s. (eds), innovation in higher education: igniting the spark for success, american council on education, rowman & litttlefield publishers inc., lanham, md, pp. 17 26. stewart, v. (2012), a world class education: learning from international models of excellence and innovation, ascd, alexandria, va. stokes, p. (2012), “what online learning can teach us about higher education?”, in wildavsky, b., kelly, a. and carey, k. (eds), reinventing higher education: the promise of innovation, harvard education press, cambridge, ma, pp. 197 224. strauss, v. (2014), “five us innovations that helped finland’s schools improve but that american reformers now ignore”, the washington post, july 25, available at: www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer sheet/wp/2014/07/25/five u s innovations that helped finlands schools improve but that american reformers now ignore/?utm_term=.cec08c870e6b (accessed october 4, 2016). tait, a. and faulkner, d. (2016), edupreneur: unleashing teacher led innovation in schools, wiley, hoboken, nj. the national center for fair and open testing (2012), “how standardized testing damages education”, fair test, the national center for fair and open testing, jamaica plain, ma, available at: http://fairtest.org/how standardized testing damages education pdf (accessed august 20, 2016). thomson, j. (2015), “poor grades”, inside higher ed, july 9, available at: www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/06/09/national poll finds overall dissatisfaction college selection process while parents (accessed august 20, 2016). unesco (2013), “itl   innovative teaching and learning research: a global look at pedagogies for 21st century skills”, ict in education, unesco, bangkok, available at: www.unescobkk.org/ education/ict/online resources/databases/ict in education database/item/article/innovative teaching and learning itl research a global look at pedagogies for 21st century skills/ (accessed august 18, 2016). us department of education (2004), “what do we mean by ‘innovation’?”, us department of education, available at: www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oii/about/definition.html vieluf, s., kaplan, d., klieme, e. and bayer, s. (2012), teaching practices and pedagogical innovation: evidence from talis, oecd publishing, paris, available at: www.oecd.org/edu/school/talisceri%202012%20(tppi) ebook.pdf wagner, t. (2012), creating innovators: the making of young people who will change the world, scribner, new york, ny. westra, k. (2016), “faculty and student perceptions of effective online learning environments”, paper no. 596, all theses, dissertations, and other capstone projects, minnesota state university, mankato, mn, available at: http://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1595&context=etds (accessed august 25, 2016). wildavsky, b., kelly, a. and carey, k. (eds) (2012), reinventing higher education: the promise of innovation, harvard education press, cambridge, ma. willingham, d. (2010), “why don’t students like school?”, a cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for your classroom, jossey bass, san francisco, ca. wrenn, v. (2016), “effects of traditional and online instructional models on student achievement outcomes”, paper no. 1135, doctoral dissertations and projects, liberty university, lynchburg, va, available at: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/1135 (accessed august 22, 2016). yu, d. and hang, c.c. (2010), “a reflective review of disruptive innovation theory”, international journal of management reviews, vol. 12 no. 4, pp. 435 452, available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468 2370.2009.00272.x/full zeihan, p. (2014), the accidental superpower: the next generation of american preeminence and the coming global disorder, twelve hachette book group, new york, ny. zhao, y. (2012), world class learners: educating creative and entrepreneurial students, corwin, thousand oaks, ca. zhao, y. and frank, k. (2003), “factors affecting technology uses in schools: an ecological perspective”, available at: https://msu.edu/~kenfrank/papers/factors%20affecting%20technology%20uses%20in%20schools.pdf (accessed july 21, 2016). the author would like to thank drs robyn hill, sara kelly and margot kinberg for their help in preparing this paper for publication. please share your general feedback contact customer support

something went wrong. wait a moment and try again.
syria’s civil war supported by news analysis what happens when the people who invented educational television try to reinvent humanitarian aid? by alex carp mr. carp is a research editor at the new york times magazine. in its 50 years on television, “sesame street” has presented an expansive idea of the challenges of childhood, offering lessons on divorce, racism, grieving and autism   as well as help with the alphabet and accepting friends who are a bit taller and more birdlike. next week, a new version of the show will begin airing for an audience that, less than a decade ago, didn’t exist: children displaced by the war in syria and their neighbors in the communities where many of the refugees have fled or sought asylum. “at this point, there are lots of 7 year olds who were born as refugees from syria” and remain far from permanent resettlement, a staff member on the project said recently. “that’s not changing soon.” since the start of the conflict, in 2011, nearly seven of every 10 residents of syria have been forced from their homes. more than 11 million have fled to unfamiliar parts of syria or to the countries across its borders, with only around 150,000 permanently resettled. they are now the largest displaced population in the world. and displacement, in the middle east and elsewhere, lasts longer than ever before: “once refugees are displaced for at least five years, as is the case for most syrian refugees,” the president of the international rescue committee, david miliband, said at a senate hearing last year, they’re likely to stay displaced for more than two decades. “sesame street” began as an experiment in television and became a global model for early childhood education. its new project, launched with the i.r.c. and educators in syria, iraq, jordan and lebanon, is an effort to rethink humanitarian aid. “aid is good at keeping people alive,” mr. miliband has argued. “but it doesn’t give them the tools to thrive.” it has traditionally been directed to immediate needs   nutrition, security, shelter   but displacement that can last for decades presents a very different kind of problem. parents often carry the trauma of forced migration with them in unexpected ways, and a childhood of makeshift housing, isolation from an extended community of familiar faces, and few safe places to play can affect not only children’s behavior and learning skills but also brain development, gene expression and the ability to build the fundamental tools of resiliency. “it can be very hard to moderate, or to cope,” said sherrie westin, sesame workshop’s president of social impact and philanthropy. preliminary research conducted in jordan and lebanon found that displaced children have trouble finding the language to express their emotions. they describe what they feel only very broadly: sad, happy, scared. the show will focus on identifying and managing emotions, and will be coupled with thousands of outreach workers going to clinics, community centers, homes and other gathering spaces in the four countries, where they will meet with children, parents and caregivers to provide support and extend many lessons of the series.