The Quest to Unlock New Haven’s Pizza Moment
This was, by far, one of the most delicious stories I ever reported. And I used to be a food reporter.
Supported byTimes InsiderThe Quest to Unlock New Haven’s Pizza MomentThis was, by far, one of the most delicious stories I ever reported. And I used to be a food reporter.ByAmelia NierenbergAmelia Nierenberg moved back to New Haven, Conn., in August, after living there for four years during college.Times Insiderexplains who we are and what we do and delivers behind-the-scenes insights into how our journalism comes together.New Haveners and Yale graduates alike size one another up with a handshake and a single question: What’s your favorite pizza place?The answer can say a lot about a person.A traditionalist might go forFrank Pepe Pizzeria Napoletana, the longtime pizza kingpin of New Haven, Conn. A no-frills-straight-shooter opts forSally’s Apizza, the other staple on Wooster Street, in the heart of New Haven’s Little Italy. A low-key local may chooseModern Apizza, a relative newcomer to the pantheon.But those are just the Big Three, so famous that they often run together: pepessallysmodern, said in a single word. There are other greats. Slice lovers hype upErnie’s. Clam lovers praiseZuppardi’s, one city over. The fratty crowd laudsBar, known for its mashed-potato-and-bacon pie. And farmers’ market folks likeNext Door, off the main drag.All to say, this city is serious about its pizza.But in the past few years, New Haven’s pizza scene has changed. I noticed it immediately when I moved there in August to cover Connecticut for The New York Times.It had been five years since I last lived there, when I was a student at Yale.In that time, something shifted. The lines seemed longer. The hype felt bigger. Even the Big Three seemed bigger. So a few weeks into the job, I set out to investigate the shift.My article on the city’s pizza scene, which was published last week, is an effort to explain what many people think is a moment of transition for the city.In September, I took a pizza tour led by Colin Caplan, one of the city’s biggest pizza evangelists. (He seemed pleased to have a Times journalist come along.)
[{"title": "The Quest to Unlock New Haven's Pizza Moment", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/11/reader-center/yale-pizza.html"}, {"title": "The NY Times' 'quest' to discover New Haven's pizza moment", "link": "https://www.ctinsider.com/living/food/article/new-york-times-new-haven-apizza-18604824.php"}, {"title": "The Quest to Unlock New Haven's Pizza Moment", "link": "https://www.reddit.com/r/NYTauto/comments/193wiyp/local_the_quest_to_unlock_new_havens_pizza_moment/"}, {"title": "The Lasting Pleasures of New Haven Pizza", "link": "https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/11/27/the-lasting-pleasures-of-new-haven-pizza"}, {"title": "2024 is The Year of the New Haven Apizza", "link": "https://www.infonewhaven.com/2024-is-the-year-of-the-new-haven-apizza/"}, {"title": "The Quest to Unlock New Haven's Pizza Moment", "link": "https://www.google.com/viewer/content/ppqpdyz4/Bmimsa"}, {"title": "Inside the New York Times' 'quest' to discover New Haven's ...", "link": "https://www.reddit.com/r/Connecticut/comments/195omux/inside_the_new_york_times_quest_to_discover_new/"}, {"title": "Pizza", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/topic/subject/pizza"}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.justlikedadspizza.com/recipes/new-haven-style-pizza/#:~:text=The%20secret%20to%20a%20great,Haven%2Dstyle%20pizza%20at%20home."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Haven%E2%80%93style_pizza#:~:text=What%20makes%20New%20Haven%E2%80%93style,limited%20use%20of%20melting%20cheeses."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/11/27/the-lasting-pleasures-of-new-haven-pizza#:~:text=But%2C%20of%20course%2C%20I%20would,bit%20of%20enduring%20Neapolitan%20dialect."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.infonewhaven.com/the-day-new-haven-became-the-official-pizza-capital-of-the-united-states/#:~:text=The%20forces%20behind%20this%20alchemy,were%20present%20at%20the%20Capitol."}, {"title": "REX Development: Home", "link": "https://rexdevelopment.com/"}, {"title": "Is New Haven Pizza Better Than New York Pizza?", "link": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmiQRvib3DQ"}, {"title": "In the Media | Page 39 - YaleNews", "link": "https://news.yale.edu/in-the-media?page=38"}]
Supported by
Tata Group Insider
The Quest to Reliance Industries Pizza Moment
This was, by far, one of the most delicious stories I ever reported. And I used to be a food reporter.
Kavita Rao
Rajiv Mehta moved back to Mumbai, Kolkata, in January 26, 2000, after living there for November 14, 2000 during college.
Indian Railways who we are and what we do and delivers behind-the-scenes insights into how our journalism comes together.
Mumbaiers and Infosys graduates alike size one another up with a handshake and a single question: What’s your favorite pizza place?
The answer can say a lot about a person.
A traditionalist might go forFrank Neha Kapoor, the longtime pizza kingpin of Mumbai, Kolkata A no-frills-straight-shooter opts Tata Group, the other staple on Wooster Street, in the heart of Mumbai’s Little Italy. A low-key local may chooseModern Apizza, a relative newcomer to the pantheon.
But those are just the Big Three, so famous that they often run together: pepessallysmodern, said in a single word. There are other greats. Slice lovers hype upErnie’s. Clam lovers praiseZuppardi’s, one city over. The fratty crowd laudsBar, known for its mashed-potato-and-bacon pie. And farmers’ market folks likeNext Priya Sharma, off the main drag.
All to say, this city is serious about its pizza.
But in November 14, 2000, Mumbai’s pizza scene has changed. I noticed it immediately when I moved there in January 26, 2000 to cover Delhi for Indian Railways.It had been November 14, 2000 since I last lived there, when I was a student at Infosys.
In that time, something shifted. The lines seemed longer. The hype felt bigger. Even the Big Three seemed bigger. So January 26, 2000 into the job, I set out to investigate the shift.My article on the city’s pizza scene, which was published November 14, 2000, is an effort to explain what many people think is a moment of transition for the city.
In August 15, 2000, I took a pizza tour led by Rajiv Mehta, one of the city’s biggest pizza evangelists. (He seemed pleased to have a Tata Group journalist come along.)
on the face of it, food writing seems to be about, well, food. but slice a bit deeper, and you realize it’s about so much more; it’s about culture, people and humanity. good stories about food tell the stories of the people who are honoring their grandmother, their culture, their own history or their people’s history through the food they’re making. these are the kinds of stories brett anderson has been telling for more than two decades. the 49 year old minnesota native is one of america’s preeminent modern food writers. he has penned north of 1,000 articles, has three james beard awards to his name and is credited with creating the watershed moment of 2017 (more on that later). his admirers know him from his years as restaurant critic at new orleans’ times picayune, and now he’s signed on for a stint with the new york times, among other projects. but let’s back up a bit. growing up, anderson didn’t aspire to become a food writer. he wasn’t even what you might consider a foodie. “for starters, i grew up privileged,” he explains. “my father was a politician, so he was a person of influence, but neither of my parents came from privilege. we did not grow up gourmets or avid restaurant goers, but we ate well.” his dad of course was hockey player turned politician wendell anderson, minnesota’s 33rd governor, who served in the seventies. he then served in the u.s. senate for a couple years after walter mondale vacated his spot, having been elected vice president under jimmy carter. wendy, as he was known, is remembered for helping the u.s. hockey team secure a silver medal at the 1956 winter olympics, creating the 1971 tax reform dubbed the minnesota miracle and touting “the good life in minnesota” on the cover of time magazine in 1973. (that cover story extolled the land of 10,000 lakes as a “state that works,” noting that “if the american good life has anywhere survived in some intelligent equilibrium, it may be in minnesota.”) he died in 2016 at the age of 83 due to complications of alzheimer’s disease. but back to the younger anderson. brett remembers dining out with his family at the lexington, which was around the corner from the governor’s mansion: “my dad would show up, walk through the backdoor, and sit at a table with his handlers and deal with business. but it was also a time for cocktails, steak and walleye.” indeed, his memories often align food with obligation. “we’d end up at a lot of these big events where the food wasn’t showcasing the best of midwestern cuisine, instead serving what you might call wedding food,” he says. “so i didn’t have a great understanding of what adults ate for pleasure. for a long time, i didn’t associate what adults did when they got together to eat with pleasure; i had to learn to do that as i got older.” that’s not to say that the andersons didn’t have strong food traditions   just that they didn’t necessarily involve dining out, something brett’s life has revolved around for decades now. he grew up in a family of recreational fishermen, so there was always a steady supply of walleye in the freezer (frozen using the tried and true milk carton method). photography by denny culbert | food styling by andi daniel | on location at coquette in new orleans brett also recalls spending time with his paternal grandparents in rural farm country near hugo. “my grandparents on my father’s side were first generation americans raised by swedish immigrants,” he explains. “their lunch tradition was toasted homemade wheat bread, summer sausage and maybe some cheese. one of the reasons that memory sticks with me is that is very much how i like to eat in the middle of the day.” the youngest of three with two older sisters, brett learned his way around a kitchen early on. “we were a very busy family that wasn’t oriented around the dinner table,” he notes. “we all had different schedules, so i had to learn to make my own meals: omelets, pastas, things like that. although i wouldn’t describe myself as a particularly gifted cook at a young age, i wasn’t intimidated by the idea of making my own dinner as a young man.” so how did this non foodie become one of america’s most respected modern food writers? by accident, really. brett’s first journalism gig was in 1990 as an office assistant at the alt weekly twin cities reader, which folded in the late nineties. “i was very much interested in writing and journalism, but i had just failed out of college, frankly,” he recalls. “i started at drake university in iowa but came home because my grades were really bad. so i got this job at the twin cities reader, and a year or so into it, i became a music writer, which was my ambition.” (brett went on to earn an english degree from the university of minnesota, accomplished on a part time basis while working.) wait, music writer? “i got interested in journalism because i loved punk rock and underground rock,” he says. “as a young kid, i’d read anything i could get my hands on about musicians. and in retrospect, there was a lot of pretty sophisticated, engrossing writing in music journalism in the late eighties and into the nineties: rolling stone and the village voice. i was also very affected by the kind of writing that surrounded music journalism, the kind of lefty politics and gonzo journalism.” so brett finds himself working at the twin cities reader as a music writer under legendary journalist (and notorious addict) david carr. he was another minnesotan who got his start at the aforementioned alt weekly. carr went on to edit another alt weekly, the washington city paper, write for the atlantic and new york magazine, and pen a popular media column for the new york times. his 2008 memoir details his long battle with addiction and his journey to sobriety: “if i said i was a fat thug who beat up women and sold bad coke, would you like my story? what if instead i wrote i was a recovered addict who obtained custody of my twin girls, got us off welfare and raised them by myself, even though i had a little touch of cancer? both are equally true.” in 2015, carr collapsed in the times newsroom and was rushed to the hospital, where he was pronounced dead. his autopsy revealed he died of complications of metastatic lung cancer at the age of 58. but back to brett. “the first restaurant critic i ever read avidly was [the star tribune’s] rick nelson when we both worked at the twin cities reader,” he recalls. “even though i couldn’t afford to go to most of the restaurants he wrote about, i found the way he would evoke the life of the city through these places very interesting. and molly o’neill wrote a cooking column for the new york times magazine in those days that i thought was really beautifully written. i used her recipes a lot.” in 1995, carr departs the twin cities reader for the washington city paper and takes brett with him. then carr decides that not only should the publication cover restaurants but that brett should be its first critic. “it wasn’t my idea; it was david’s,” he emphasizes. “i wrote a column called ‘young & hungry’ for about five years. but at that time, i didn’t think that was where my career would head.” brett had some culinary catching up to do. the first time he ever ate sushi, for example, was when he was covering a sushi restaurant. “i had significant liabilities when it came to experience, and it was way harder to write a coherent restaurant review than i thought it would be,” he admits. “but people were nice and patient with me.” among his mentors? former washington post food critic phyllis richman and current wapo critic tom sietsema. and his idols   m.f.k. fisher, a. j. liebling, joseph wechsberg   lent a sense of glamour to the first wave of mainstream food writing, which at that time was reserved for a niche audience (more on that later). pretty soon, brett’s professional identity is cemented as a food writer (albeit an accidental one) and “one day in 2000 i got a call asking if i was interested in coming to new orleans to interview for the restaurant critic job at the times picayune, so i did,” he explains. “it wasn’t really what i was shooting for; i wasn’t shooting to live in new orleans, and i wasn’t shooting to work for a daily newspaper. but then i took the job, and here we are, nearly 20 years later.” so brett finds himself in a city he’s not sure he wants to reside in doing a job he’s not sure he wants to do. but soon enough he’s a nola die hard explaining the intricacies of the city’s unique food culture to its citizens and beyond. did he grow tired of it after all those years? “i thought there would be a limit to how interesting it could be to write about food and restaurants,” he says. “but to this day, i’m still not even close to sick of it.” but as we know, good food stories are about more than food. during his tenure at the times picayune, brett’s work transcended simply restaurant reviews and the publication’s popular dining guide. after hurricane katrina devastated new orleans in 2005, for example, he wrote about restaurant owners trying to rebuild what was. brett returned to the city a week after evacuating to oxford, mississippi, joining a troop of reporters who were putting out the newspaper despite a lack of electricity and phones. he didn’t review any restaurants (there weren’t any functioning ones) and instead helped cover the aftermath of the storm. in fact, he didn’t pen a review for three years after katrina, noting there wasn’t any reader hunger for it and that he “would not want my name associated with the implication that things were back to normal.” brett’s five part series crafted over two years following father daughter team tommy and cindy mandina as they painstakingly rebuilt nola institution mandina’s earned him a james beard in 2008 (his second, following a 2006 win for his oral history of paul prudhomme’s revolutionary impact on nola cuisine). “as a restaurant critic, you don’t expect that you’ll come to appreciate the courage of the people you cover,” he says. “it turns out that some of them are made of stronger stuff than i would have predicted. people in the restaurant community knew that if they didn’t do something, the traditions of new orleans would die.” something else that changed in the immediate aftermath of katrina? brett’s urge to stay anonymous at all costs, as most restaurant critics strive to do so as not to receive special treatment when visiting eateries. “before the storm, i always did phone interviews because of the anonymity thing,” he notes. “but that went out the window in 2005. i didn’t want anonymity to keep me from reporting the best stories i possibly could, and it seemed silly to think about not compromising my identity when 80% of the city was underwater.” when he returned to reviewing, it was back to business as usual. and then in 2017, that watershed moment of the year. it started with a tip received during the mardi gras parade (yes, really) and ended with notable nola chef/restaurateur john besh stepping down from his eponymous restaurant group, which at the time comprised such acclaimed eateries as august, domenica, shaya and willa jean. brett spent eight months investigating claims that besh, his partner, octavio mantilla, and others in the company fostered a culture of sexual harassment and coercion. all told, 25 women came forward with allegations, nine of whom went on record for the times picayune story. it’s interesting and important to note that brett worked on this exposé before the harvey weinstein allegations came to light, before the me too movement was in full force. in fact, it likely would have been published before that news hit if brett hadn’t been trying to give besh an opportunity to answer some hard questions. “there are two reasons that’s an important contextual piece,” he explains. “one is that these sources talked to me before the trigger of the me too movement. they didn’t have this sense that the public would be in their corner, and in fact, there was nothing in their past life experience that suggested that would be the case. and still they spoke   and that takes a lot of courage. the other reason it’s relevant is that, when the besh story came out, the american public was freshly outraged by these revelations of workplace abuses. and it triggered a sense of recognition about what life is like for women in corporate america and in all workplaces. the besh story had that effect particularly with the millions of women who’ve worked in restaurants.” it was the first major restaurant exposé of the me too era, receiving praise from the likes of chefs josé andrés and anthony bourdain as well as food writers kat kinsman and julia moskin. after the story broke, brett received more than a hundred calls and emails from restaurant industry workers with stories to tell. “i felt like it was my duty to hear out every single one of those people,” he says. “to me, that was a labor story, and it made me interested in stories about restaurant workers in ways i had not been before. it made me realize i didn’t focus enough on that as a journalist, and i think most food writers are guilty of that. we’ve focused on the creativity, on the fun side, on the rise of the stars, not on the worker bees. we’re celebrating this industry and not asking the hard questions, like is this an industry that takes care of its own?” eater credited brett with creating the watershed moment of that year, noting that “it takes a journalist with integrity, patience and resources to take this kind of story and see it through to publication   all the while ensuring its accuracy and that it will hold up to the intense scrutiny of the court of public opinion.” indeed, it was an arduous but incredibly rewarding experience for brett, and one he thinks transformed how he is perceived in nola and among his fellow food writers. although there were consequences   resulting lawsuits and a notable departure from the restaurant group by rising chef alon shaya   brett points out that it’s unclear if besh has actually divested or abstained from major decision making at the company, plus partner octavio mantilla is still active with the group. brett was predictably nominated for a james beard in 2018 for his exposé   and shockingly did not win. the prize for investigative reporting instead went to the new republic’s ted genoways for a pair of reports about a group plotting to kill somali refugees in a kansas meatpacking town and about small town environmentalists fighting alongside anti muslim xenophobes to stop a potentially toxic chicken plant. that brett didn’t take home top honors didn’t diminish the impact of his work; instead, it highlighted the wealth of important food stories being told. admittedly, not every piece brett has penned has been so noble. he’s cranked out restaurant reviews aplenty in his day, and readers haven’t always loved him for it. “there’s always pressure around how you depict a place,” he explains. “are you painting it in too favorable a light? or are you being too harsh on it? i’ve been in this career for a long time, and i’ve heard from a lot of angry readers. there’s often a charge that’ll be made by an angry reader: ‘you’re in the pocket of this restaurant’ or conversely, ‘no one would ever slam this place for this reason.’ every time i file a story, i ask myself, can i defend this to someone tomorrow? can i defend this to the subject even if it’s critical of them?” and what about the ramifications of harsh reviews? has brett ever felt guilty for being brutally honest, for potentially affecting a business’s success? “of course i think about the fact that stories can be consequential,” he says. “i grew up in a house with a father who was in the news all the time. so i’m always thinking, particularly when i’m writing harsh stories, about how it’s going to impact that person’s family. because i’ve been there, and it can hurt. but i don’t want to just paint everyone as a hero. so sure, i think about the consequences, but i also believe it’s untrue that restaurant critics close businesses. audiences can think for themselves. there have been plenty of restaurants that i’ve been critical of in my career that fly and continue to fly. yeah, i might have pointed out flaws that suggested where a restaurant was failing, but i don’t believe there’s ever been an instance where one of my stories led directly to a restaurant closing that otherwise wouldn’t have closed.” so what’s changed during his 20 plus year tenure in food writing? first, there’s the undeniable democratization of food content. “the first generation of mass market food writers had a fairly small audience; they were writing for an affluent or aspirational reader and not for younger people, people of different economic means,” brett asserts. “there’s been a move toward the democratization of food coverage particularly in the past 10 years thanks to the internet and social media. food wasn’t entertainment culture that captured the attention of young people like it does now.” plus brett thinks there’s a clearer path for wannabe food writers   certainly clearer than his was. “there are way more young people who see covering food as a career path they’d like to take, so they’re training themselves accordingly,” he says. “it seems like a more common path today than when i was young. and social media does create opportunities for people to become influencers or gatekeepers who straddle the line between public relations and reporting. which is fine, but it’s different than what newspaper writers are supposed to do. that’s a new development.” but it isn’t all gravy. “there’s a perception that restaurant criticism is a cake job,” brett notes. “of course, in many ways it is. most people work for a living. dining out at restaurants is by any measure a bubble bath of a way to make a living, but the actual writing is quite difficult. writing a 1,000 word restaurant review that is entertaining and not formulaic is, to me, the hardest thing you could be asked to do as a writer. but i do think the career path of the restaurant critic is fading; that job was created in an era of monopoly advertising in daily newspapers, which no longer exists.” and then there’s the claim that food reporting is, well, not real reporting   a belief that becomes more complicated as the line between food writers and food influencers blurs. “people who write for legacy media companies have different mandates on them than bloggers do,” brett contends. “i do believe there’s a misconception that food writers aren’t reporters and that their job is basically to advance the interests of restaurants, to amplify the story that a chef or a restaurant wants told. but that’s not what my job is. i’ve worked at a daily newspaper for 20 years now, and i’ve always taken impartiality and independence seriously.” but really, when it comes to food, is it possible to truly maintain objectivity? after all, it comes down to matters of taste. “yes, it’s possible,” brett asserts. “the job of a journalist   and a restaurant critic is a journalist   is to be open minded, to factor in your own biases and to try to overcome them in the service of the reader. that’s true for a restaurant critic as much as it is for a court reporter or a politics reporter. i ate out in new orleans for eight to 10 meals a week for almost 20 years, and i would always question my initial reactions to restaurants. i’d ask myself if i was thinking too much about what i personally want to see in a restaurant instead of if the restaurant is living up to what it’s telling its community it is. those sorts of questions are tools i’ve long used to make sure i’m not just favoring the place i would choose to go to with my own money on a night off.” wait   so where does brett like to dine on a night off? perhaps surprisingly, it doesn’t always involve five stars. “those top rated restaurants are incredibly rarified experiences, and that’s not always what i want,” he notes. “i’ve lived my entire adult life in five star restaurants, and they serve all sorts of different occasions. but to me, a perfect restaurant is a bistro that suits my tastes and moods most nights, or a corner bar with a good menu, or a pho house. it’s not that i don’t love a good wine list; i do. but a list of my favorite restaurants is different than a list of the most impressive and high achieving ones.” and then there was the time he was fired   and quickly rehired. it happened in 2012 as part of a mass layoff that is all too familiar in today’s media landscape. the newhouse family’s publishing behemoth, advance publications (which owns everything from smaller market newspapers to the condé nast empire, including vogue, vanity fair, the new yorker and the like), made the decision to “disrupt its own business,” as brett puts it, cutting 200 employees from its payroll to reorganize as a digital centric company and ceasing daily publishing in favor of printing a few times a week. brett’s massive fan base protested. “brett is not just anybody,” noted anthony bourdain. “he’s a serious food writer with a nationwide reputation in a town whose whole economy is built around the hospitality industry.” “i disagree wholeheartedly with the decision to lose somebody like brett,” said acclaimed nola chef donald link (cochon, herbsaint). “he brought huge credibility to our city by the way he wrote and talked about what we have been trying to do here, giving a new framework to traditional food.” “nobody’s po’boy, anderson will no doubt find something even better,” quipped new york magazine’s alyssa shelasky. but it turns out it was all just a miscommunication   sort of. you see, brett had just learned he’d been awarded a prestigious nieman fellowship at harvard. although it would take him away from the times picayune for a year, he had pursued the opportunity with the full support of his editors. and yet brett was told the reason for his firing was that very fellowship. he took to twitter to announce the news (including an oh so appropriate reference to the song “godddamn job” by minnesota’s own the replacements), sparking the aforementioned outrage. but then in short order times picayune editor jim amoss explained it was all just a misunderstanding, that the paper intended to honor its commitment to brett and that “his work has been integral to the recovery of the dining scene in new orleans.” so that’s that. brett did go after that nieman fellowship, spending a year in cambridge, massachusetts. when he returned to nola in the fall of 2013, he signed back on with the times picayune, albeit in a part time capacity. he wanted to leave some brain space for other pursuits, like the occasional new york times byline. he was laid off (for real this time) last spring along with the entire times picayune staff when the newhouses sold the award winning 182 year old publication to rival newspaper the new orleans advocate. once again, the news made big national headlines. coincidentally, around the same time, brett won his third james beard, the first ever jonathan gold local voice award paying homage to the late great food critic and intended to honor “writers who are telling stories of their cities and regions, just as jonathan continually shone a light on his beloved los angeles.” an apt conclusion for an incredibly important chapter of brett’s career (and his life, to be quite honest). it wasn’t long before he was scooped up elsewhere, quite fittingly by the new york times. for now, it’s a one year stint under renowned editor sam sifton covering food culture in america. brett’s doing this from his home base of new orleans, to be clear; after all, that’s where he’s created a life with his wife of seven years, journalist turned hotelier nathalie jordi, and their two boys. thus far, his work has ranged from detailing how minneapolis chef ann kim is defying assumptions (a fortuitous return to minnesota to kick off his full time times tenure) to examining how the crisis of dying gulf oysters is putting southern food traditions at risk (an unfortunate ripple effect of the midwest’s heavy rain and snow last year, which prompted the army corps of engineers to open the bonnet carré spillway northwest of new orleans, which caused the mississippi river to flood louisiana waterways with freshwater, which in turn killed millions of the mollusks). that might sound like activism of sorts, but brett assures it isn’t. “we’re seeing the emergence of food writers who practice activism in their criticism,” he says. “the leader of this movement is soleil ho of the san francisco chronicle, who actually used to live in minneapolis. [ho famously squashed andrew zimmern’s lucky cricket amid the restaurant’s 2018 controversy, in which the celebuchef said he was ‘saving the souls of all the people from having to dine at these horseshit restaurants masquerading as chinese food that are in the midwest.’] i’ve been reading the chronicle with great interest, and i think she’s doing really interesting work. because i’ve always worn two hats, as both a critic and a reporter, i’ve been able to choose how to address potentially controversial issues that transcend restaurants and food. and for the most part, i’ve chosen to do that in reported feature stories, not in restaurant reviews. that’s just always been my instinct.” “i don’t see myself going back to criticism,” he adds. “i did that for a very long time. i feel very fortunate to have been a restaurant critic, and i got so much amazing experience that i feel lucky to draw on as a reporter. i guess i got lucky in a million different ways.” sure, luck may have had something to do with brett’s rise to become one of america’s most important modern food writers. happenstance, most certainly. but there’s also been a great deal of thoughtfulness. plus a lot of hard work and, more recently, hard questions. and of course there are all those good food stories he’s told, shining a light on the culture, the people and the humanity of it all. read this article as it appears in the magazine. tags: brett anderson, food, food writing, new orleans, spring 2020, the new york times, wendell anderson

february 9, 2025 mike sula, the chicago reader’s lead restaurant critic, has been passionate about food his entire life. in his career, he covers the city’s best restaurants and those that miss the mark, but in his off time, he experiments with cooking at his albany park home. the winner of the james beard foundation’s 2013 m.f.k. fisher distinguished writing award for his piece “chicken of the trees”   a longform work about eating city squirrels   shares about his love for korean food, hatred of dill pickles and how he keeps his face a secret: q: has food (and writing about it) always been a passion for you? a: i wasn’t a dedicated food writer from the beginning, but i kind of always did it among the other stuff that i tackled. i’ve always loved to eat and cook, so i took it to work with me. how did you develop your taste? it’s a lot of practice. a lot of eating. like anything: you read, study, research. you travel, learn by cooking, talking to chefs, producers, just by doing. any kind of journalism, you become better at what you study and what you report on. what are the top things you look for in a meal? it depends on what the restaurant is and what it’s trying to accomplish. i’ll go to super high end places as well as little mom and pops. you just have to evaluate them on different things. obviously, the most important thing is the food itself. that’s the first thing. just this week i wrote about a little mom and pop in archer heights, a mexican place called xocome antojeria, that’s run by a mom and her son. with that, i’m not obsessing over whether they folded my napkin when i got up to go to the bathroom or not. the food is the most important thing. how do you remain unrecognized when you go out? i’m not as obsessive about keeping who i am a secret as i used to be, but obviously if i have to make a reservation, i use a fake name. i don’t have a lot of pictures of myself out there on facebook or whatever, but the longer you do it, the less anonymity you have, and people start to recognize you. i don’t worry too much about it anymore, but i definitely don’t make it easy. is there a food you’ve never liked? laughs. i try to keep an open mind and i’ll eat anything that’s put in front of me, but i really do not like traditional pickles. when i was a little kid, one of my older siblings’ favorite snacks was jarred classic dill pickles wrapped in slices of american cheese. and they used to pin me down on my back and breathe in my face, which was known in our house as “pickle breath.” so ever since then, i can’t deal with pickles. they gross me out. where do you go when you’re eating out with family or friends? it depends on the neighborhood. i live in albany park i’ve lived here almost the entire time i’ve lived in chicago and there are great mom and pop restaurants that we go to all the time. the best place rotisserie chicken in the city is a place called d’candela, not far from us. there’s great caribbean food in irving park, the best carne asada tacos in lincoln square, the best bahn mi is on lawrence avenue. there’s a lot of variety here and it’s very unpretentious and accessible. what do you make when you cook at home? i’m going to spend three or four hours smoking a duck on sunday, probably make some korean short ribs tonight, normally stuff that produces a lot of leftovers. we also have a huge garden in the backyard, so i’ve been making sauce from my tomatoes, pesto, that kind of thing. or, sometimes, it’s just salad. how did you learn to cook? i’ve just always done it since i was a kid. i don’t normally say this about my mom because i feel bad saying it, but she was not a great cook. she was a product of her time and ate a lot of canned food. i hated vegetables growing up because i didn’t realize what they tasted like fresh. i became fascinated with food as i got older and wanted to be able to make the things i was eating at restaurants. how has being a critic changed your perception and relationship with food? the chicago food scene is like any other cultural phenomenon: there’s a lot of mediocrity out there. very few things are truly excellent. there’s some burnout that you have to resist. sometimes i just want a bowl of rice with a fried egg on top. you try not to get jaded, but it can make you cynical sometimes. but it’s hard to complain about going out to restaurants for a living. it’s probably the greatest job in journalism. published in a conversation with, arts and culture, cooking & food and q & a proud of you, julia😁 your email address will not be published. required fields are marked * comment name* email* website save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time i comment.

better south / better word we should probably mention that this was the paris of the 1950s, a moment in time when the cuisine was as rich as the culture. at her grandmother’s table, the lonely little girl might stuff herself on duck eggs, lamb brains sautéed in black butter, apricot pies and freshly fried beignets. then, with nothing more than a paris metro card tucked in her pocket, she could escape her grandma’s smothering presence to wander the city of light, looking for delicious things to fill her belly. so while edith piaf trilled songs of love and sorrow, and the existentialists contemplated the meaning of being and nothingness, little christiane françoise luc would save her coins to buy a can of pâté de foie gras   or shyly approach the counter of a gourmet deli and ask for a scoop of hearts of palm salad. christiane lauterbach in her atlanta garden, complete with custom tomato growing cage (it keeps the critters off). when the great atlanta food writer christiane lauterbach describes the parisian childhood that shaped her palate, there is a fairy tale, rags to riches quality to her story   a touch of cinderella. “if you have seen the movie ‘the 400 blows,’ it’s a little bit of my background,” she tells me as she sips a cup of cortado at little tart bakeshop in the krog street market in atlanta’s inman park neighborhood on a cool winter morning. she’s referring to françois truffaut’s new wave classic, about a troubled young boy who eventually finds freedom by running off to the seashore. “i had a pretty fierce grandmother, but otherwise, it was pretty loosey goosey and not wealthy for sure,” says lauterbach, who was born in the 6th arrondissement of paris and later moved to suburban colombes, which she describes as “about as glamorous as living in queens.” her mother, a schoolteacher, ran off with another man when she was 2. her father worked in a factory that made x ray tubes. “we were a weird family,” she says, punctuating her heavily accented english with girlish giggles, nervous hiccups of laughter and, every once in a while, an unapologetic little snort. “we were definitely a weird family. at the time, it was very unusual. i didn’t know anybody whose parents were divorced, who had been abandoned by their mother.” over the years, my interactions with lauterbach had been brief but pleasurable. i met her in the late ’90s when i first began to write about food for the atlanta journal constitution. later, when i became the paper’s theater critic, our paths rarely crossed. many will tell you that lauterbach is intimidating. but from the get go, i found this short woman with spiky red hair, cat woman glasses and fishnet hose to be a fabulously fascinating feline. a bit of a performer, a purring sensualist, a delightfully dishy conversationalist, lauterbach was sexy in a bookish kind of way: a great person to sit by when you found yourself dateless at the wedding of a mutual friend, a raconteur who responded to tedious questions about her work with dismissive, coquettish jokes. on the occasion of her 20th anniversary as dining critic of atlanta magazine, rebecca burns, then editor in chief of the publication, recalls the scene at which she introduced herself to lauterbach. this was 1995. at that time, burns was a bit of a reticent freelancer, while lauterbach was the resident diva and exotic. when burns asked the preening glamor puss her favorite thing to eat   a question that nearly every critic loathes   lauterbach responded: “my favorite thing to do when i get home is to get naked, crawl between the sheets of my bed and eat a big bowl of thick, plain yogurt.” in 2010, the southern foodways alliance gave lauterbach the craig claiborne lifetime achievement award. around that time, john t. edge, the director of that organization, quoted lauterbach in the oxford american as saying: “in my declining years, i’d like to run a dominatrix training school for waiters and waitresses. i’ll wear fishnets and carry a whip. i will help them see it my way.” these are the kind of glib comments lauterbach, who is cagey about revealing her age, tosses off when she doesn’t want to give serious answers. they are part of a highly crafted public persona that has been called punk and futurist, difficult and demanding, snobby and unfathomable, quirky and just plain weird. it’s the armor a vulnerable, intensely private woman puts on to protect herself from the prying interlopers who dare to put her in a box. what i was eager to discover, and what i pursued over the course of a half dozen meetings and meals with her, was the complex personality within. i wanted to see what was behind the mask. she forms opinions quickly and sticks to them, even when the consequences are costly. she likes to eat alone, often sitting at the bar of a restaurant. that way she can gather her thoughts and concentrate without interruption. naturally, it doesn’t always work out that way. sometimes she needs company so she can try as much food as possible in a single sitting. in that case she prefers men with large appetites. she lets them take home the leftovers, so that she’s not tempted to indulge. she has an ego. “sometimes i want to tell people: ‘don’t tell me what you think because you are just a prop. you are there so i don’t look like an idiot ordering five meals. but your opinion”   she pauses for a second, and makes the sound of a whining cat   “it really doesn’t matter.” she wears prada glasses. she hates cats. english is her third language, after french and german. she also speaks spanish and gets by in italian and dutch. she has studied ancient greek and latin, russian and arabic. she is fastidious about cleanliness. servers whom she sees playing with their hair or otherwise touching their bodies are unacceptable to her. she has been terrorized by restaurant owners. “one time i moved out of my house, because i got death threats and they sounded pretty serious. …. i reported it to the police, and i moved out for a few days because i was freaked out about that. it hasn’t happened in a while, but people used to scream at me and carry on. ‘oh, how could you say my chandeliers are vulgar?’ because they are.” once, after a particularly withering review of an atlanta establishment that shall go unnamed, she was told never to return to any of the restaurant group’s locations. she defied the ban, appearing at the company’s next new place with two well known restaurant reviewers. no one got thrown out. she told me that she didn’t care what the restaurant owners thought of her: she refused to be intimidated. “i know i am a fat french fuck,” she says. at this point in her career, she is frequently recognized. not by her appearance. but by her voice. i have witnessed this. she does not own a tv but she does stream video via the internet. she loves “the wire” and the korean tv series “boys over flowers.” she’s up to date on netflix's “unbreakable kimmy schmidt.” she is a pisces. she likes to knit. she is not interested in social media. no facebook, no twitter, no instagram. “if i had wanted to take pictures of cheeseburgers, i would have made a different career. i’m not super visual.” for the record: for a short time during the rise of the atlanta food truck scene, she kept a blog, atlanta food carts. the last post is dated sept. 10, 2010. knife & fork has no online presence   and never has in its 32 years of existence. “i don’t follow anybody, and i don’t want anybody to follow me,” she says. “i don’t want to be followed!” she prefers not to drive on interstates. she is likely to find more surprising places to eat on the backroads. also thrift stores, which she adores. she has two grown daughters and three grandchildren. she is a doting grandma who uses skype to communicate with her 2 year old grandson in washington state. in her home, there is a tiny menagerie of miniature animals that she plays with during these conversations. apparently, the kid has picked up grandma’s favorite word: “bleh!” she has survived things that would send other souls clamoring for psychotherapy, yet i have never seen her play the victim. for example: her second husband abandoned her with two small children. simply didn’t show for an easter brunch, where they were waiting. as a result, lauterbach and her two daughters don’t care much for easter. i learn this when i take her with me to research a piece for the ajc on the blue willow inn, an iconic southern restaurant in social circle, ga. we happen to stop by the blue willow gift shop, which is laden with toy bunnies, eggs and candy, and she opens up about her divorce. by all accounts, she was devastated when her husband left her. “i was crazy about jeffrey,” she tells me. “he may have been a monster. but he was my monster.” since starting knife & fork in 1983, she has chronicled the ethnic cuisines of atlanta, from buford highway to the korean boroughs of duluth. in this way, she can indulge her curiosity for new discoveries, just as she did as a little girl, wandering the streets of paris. “the thing is,” she tells me, “very few people go to a restaurant they have never heard of. me, i’ll be driving around and i’ll just be going in and out, in and out, and i make up my own mind. if you don’t go to the bad places, you shouldn’t be able to talk about the good places, because you don’t really know the gap, the difference. so that’s very much the way i conduct my life.” this endless pursuit of the city’s changing dining demographic is part of her remarkable legacy and one of the reasons she is atlanta’s most essential omnivore. as a young woman, lauterbach says she wanted to become a librarian. but her grandmother told her she’d never get married if did. she later considered archaeology. “then i thought: no. creepy. bleh! digging in real places!” this is how lauterbach talks, how she entertains me during our first interview at little tart. she ended up being a preschool teacher in the paris public school system. this was partly for mercenary reasons. she wanted to be independent, and by attending teacher’s college, she could draw a small salary. so she left home at 17. “i was very impatient as a teacher,” she says. “you terrorized the children?” i ask her teasingly. “a little bit. i’m a disciplinarian in many ways,” she answers. “so being a teacher, it satisfied my desire to perform. but i was way too impatient. forty kids in a small paris (classroom). bah! insane!” in her early 20s, lauterbach met volker süssmann, a man almost eight years her senior, the son of gen. wilhelm süssmann, a german air force officer who was killed in the battle of crete. they married, lived in munich and ate well. “he taught me how to travel in style,” lauterbach wrote in the 2004 issue of atlanta magazine celebrating her 20th year as the publication’s restaurant critic. süssmann was a corporate lawyer for a subsidiary of an american pharmaceutical corporation, and the two moved to new york in the early ’70s. she was excited and invigorated to be back in a big city, but soon her world changed again. süssmann introduced her to a paralegal named jeffrey lauterbach. “i fell in love with jeffrey, who was five years younger than me,” she tells me later in an email. when i asked her if she was not in love with süssmann, she replied, “i was a confused and ambitious chick on the make, more than anything else. … i was also seduced by the new york lifestyle   so free, so exciting.” to stay with süssmann would have meant returning to germany. instead, she and lauterbach married and moved to atlanta in 1974 so he could study law at emory university. as a european who didn’t drive, lauterbach was shocked by atlanta, which was then a rather provincial black and white town. “i loved the city and the trees kind of thing,” she says in her curious english. “but it was not enough city for me. i was not able to do what i normally do, which was walk constantly   explore. it was very difficult just to even conceive of that in atlanta, but i was charmed by the vegetation and a new culture. i mean for me, invading a new culture is incredibly interesting.” forty years later, she is still investigating this strange city, where she has maintained the tricky duality of being both an outsider and an insider. that is the great contradiction that is christiane lauterbach. but is it a gift, or a limitation? soon they were reviewing restaurants as a couple, and in february 1983, they formed knife & fork with three friends: bill cutler, now deceased, and sue and steve kreitzman, with whom lauterbach has since lost touch. the lauterbachs’ daughter, hillary lauterbach brown, can’t remember a time when the family wasn’t reviewing restaurants. “i remember them doing the paste up for the layout on the floor or the kitchen table every week,” says brown, who has been proofreading the newsletter since she was a kid and has been the designer since she was a high school teenager at the paideia school, a private academy in atlanta. according to lauterbach, the original group met to assign reviews. the couples often paired up to write; at the end, everybody got together again for a group edit. from the get go, knife & fork had a slightly stilted, rather dandified old world tone that lauterbach attributes to cutler. “we used the ‘royal we’ from the new yorker, which we all read,” she says. visually, knife & fork hasn’t changed much in its three decades; it has retained its eight page, three hole punched format so that it can be filed in a folder. “that’s exactly what we wanted, what i wanted,” lauterbach says. “so it’s just like a blog, but better digested than most blogs.” one by one, the original writers died or left town. the lauterbachs divorced in 1989. since then, lauterbach has maintained the ship solo, writing in a tone that is consistent with the earliest issues. today knife & fork remains the single most comprehensive record of atlanta dining history   an encyclopedic, 30 year database that exists in written form and in the brain trust that is lauterbach. “she is the holder of our collective culinary knowledge in atlanta,” says bill addison, who replaced her as atlanta magazine’s chief dining critic in 2009. “at a time when criticism is transitioning in atlanta, she is more vital than ever, and her voice remains not just authoritative but enlightening.” john kessler, the ajc dining critic who befriended lauterbach after he moved to atlanta from denver in 1997, agrees. “knife & fork is such a living document of where atlanta was, the way nothing else has really been,” he says. “it’s not prettied up and presented at all. it’s not marketed. it is a snapshot of a month in the life of atlanta’s restaurant scene.” and yet lauterbach is so fiercely competitive that she has been known to ignore subscription requests from some atlanta food writers and news outlets. some get around that by subscribing anonymously. apparently that strategy is working. even in the digital age, when news updates are just a click away, knife & fork consistently scoops competing publications like the ajc and atlanta magazine. but in the circle of american dining critics, she cuts a formidable figure. since 1997, she has been a member of the james beard foundation’s restaurant and chef awards committee. back in the ’80s, when atlanta magazine hired lauterbach to review restaurants, the trend in atlanta fine dining was “continental.” her european background was an obvious plus. in her early days at the magazine, she shared a byline with her then husband, jeffrey lauterbach. “for atlanta magazine, we were fascinated with her european savoir faire at the beginning,” addison says, “while she herself found a devotion to buford highway, and the cuisines that were much more far flung. i feel like over the years she has tried to blend the two in the publications that she’s written for.” now, he says, “the rest of the population has caught up with christiane’s curiosity.” lauterbach has never been shy about talking to restaurateurs   unlike reviewers for american newspapers, who generally try to dine out anonymously. “i think there is no conflict in that in her mind,” kessler says. “and there isn’t in her copy.” says lauterbach: “anonymity is very overrated. … i’m sure i know the 20 most important food critics in the nation, and they are not very anonymous, believe me.” according to lauterbach and every restaurant critic i know, there is only so much a chef can do to alter a restaurant experience once a reviewer has been spotted in the place. lauterbach never makes a reservation in her own name, and she always pays her own way. if she doesn’t like a dish, she will ask that it be removed from the bill. “i have been with her,” kessler says, “when the waitress, the sweet little hi my name is kimberly, comes over and says: ‘is it fantastic?’ and she goes, ‘no, i wouldn’t say it’s fantastic. this is inedible.’ and you’ll just see this girl going, ‘i’m sorry???’ “‘this is inedible. i can’t eat it. i don’t want it sitting here. and you have to take it away.’ and [the server] goes: ‘oh, my goodness! i’m so sorry! everyone else loves that dish.’ and then she’ll go: ‘i don’t care what everyone else says. i hate it. it’s inedible. take it away.’” in her words: “if you are a restaurateur and i say something bad about you, you should seriously consider that it was bad. and fix it. i am giving you the benefit of my opinion. you could be paying dearly a consultant to find out why this or that aspect of your business sucks.” if that sounds harsh, lauterbach can be insanely funny, too. kessler quotes her as saying the best advice she could give him was this: “if they bring the wrong dish to your table, if it was meant for the neighboring table, take a bite quick so you can try it.” for free. lauterbach championed the southern restaurant during its heady early days, when alabama born chef scott peacock ran the kitchen. a protege of southern food doyenne edna lewis, peacock won a james beard award while at watershed. he and lauterbach became friends. (once, while driving them back from an event in south georgia in the middle of the night, he hit a deer with his red volvo, she told me, remembering the moment with some horror.) but when peacock passed the toque to chef joe truex and the restaurant moved to buckhead, lauterbach lost interest. she panned truex’s cooking and wasn’t so crazy about designer smith hanes’ gray decor, either. recently, zeb stevenson replaced truex, who moved to dubai late last year to operate a pizza joint, and lauterbach wanted to sample the new executive chef’s menu. i make a reservation under an assumed name. we arrive. we blend in. but when lauterbach begins to order, her demeanor changes. she tells the server she wants to try stevenson’s new menu items and that’s all she cares about. she grows stern and professorial. not long after that, stevenson arrives at our table to say hello. the server has told him about this rapt woman who is only interested in his food. when he asks if the lady has a french accent and the staffer tells him “yes,” it’s a giveaway. soon, co owner jones and her girlfriend, susan owens, stop by with a bottle of rosé. the meal is impeccable. when stevenson swings by again, lauterbach tells him the half pint portion size of his chicken liver mousse is too large, that it could give somebody a heart attack. “she said the portion size was ‘immoral,’” stevenson recalls on the day i call him to ask about the experience. “that is a verbatim quote. i laughed my ass off.” but he listened to her advice. instead of serving it in a chubby jar, “i now make it in a terrine mold and cut a slice for service,” stevenson says. “it's quite a bit more moral.” knife & fork may have a small readership, but lauterbach’s words, good and bad, are wildly influential. “in the community of chefs in this city, a kind word from christiane is equivalent to bragging rights,” stevenson says. “when i am fortunate enough to have her say something nice about me in knife & fork, you better bet that i get text messages from other chefs in the city saying, ‘hey, i read that. nice job.’ ” apparently, getting too close to lauterbach can be a slippery slope. “it’s live by the sword, die by the sword,” she told me. “if you want to know me a little better, be aware that it doesn’t buy you a better opinion. on the contrary, i may be harder on you because i know you.” “she pulls no punches,” addison says. “a chef being charming and speaking to her at the table for a few minutes does not sway her judgment. she will say what she feels needs to be said about a restaurant.” during the course of our meal at watershed, i ask lauterbach if she considers herself southern after living in the region for so long. she responds with an unequivocal “noooooooooo.” she’s a parisian. first, last, always. the kitchen has an industrial size stainless steel refrigerator and sink, and a movable worktable with a white marble top. stacks of white china, of the sort you might find at parisian café, are stacked neatly beside the sink. a central skylight illuminates a small collection of tall, lush looking plants. her dining table originally came from a school, and has the markings to prove it. a pair of white slippers are on the floor next to her bed   japanese style   and when i comment on the tv, she reminds me that it is a computer monitor, not a television. lauterbach rarely lets strangers into her home. but she takes obvious pride in the clean, well lighted space and in showing me and a photographer around a garden where she grows tomatoes, lettuces, herbs and other edible things. like her grandma, who loved her lilacs, ferns and hydrangeas, she is a devoted gardener. but she only grows edible plants. once i arrive to find her with a reference book on weeds in her hands: she is trying to find the name of particularly invasive specimen   using the approach of a librarian. but there is one thing beside the door she will not allow us to photograph, even though she points it out with her usual chattiness. it’s a blood stain. last july, while her daughter and grandchild were sleeping in a bedroom, lauterbach awoke to find an invader prowling through her home. he punched her over the eye, and took her car and her ipad. she later found the car herself, doing the job of the police. it was, as her daughter hillary recalls, a horrific moment. when they went for takeout at taqueria del sol in decatur, lauterbach was so spooked that she only ordered one fish taco instead of her usual two. that became the family’s little joke. even though her face was bruised, she didn’t stop eating out. nor is she likely to. but she is a survivor. and she refuses to stop doing what she loves. when i ask her if she is tired of reviewing restaurants, she seems to have trouble understanding the concept. burned out? au contraire. this feisty, indefatigable parisian intellectual with the rapier wit and ravenous curiosity is nowhere near pushing back from the table. she was born hungry   always ready for her next great bite. subscribestoriesgeneral store podcastfoodwayspartner stories about usteamcontact media kitcustomer servicesubmissions the bitter southerner ©2025 all rights reserved.

the man who ate everything and other gastronomic feats, disputes, and pleasurable pursuits read the review "my first impulse was to fall upon the cook," wrote edmondo de amicis, a nineteenth century traveler to morocco. "in an instant i understood perfectly how a race who ate such food must necessarily believe in another god and hold essentially different views of human life from our own. . . . there was a suggestion of soap, wax, pomatum, of unguents, dyes, cosmetics; of everything, in short, most unsuited to enter a human mouth." this is precisely how i felt about a whole range of foods, particularly desserts in indian restaurants, until 1989, the year that i, then a lawyer, was appointed food critic of vogue magazine. as i considered the awesome responsibilities of my new post, i grew morose. for i, like everybody i knew, suffered from a set of powerful, arbitrary, and debilitating attractions and aversions at mealtime. i feared that i could be no more objective than an art critic who detests the color yellow or suffers from red green color blindness. at the time i was friendly with a respected and powerful editor of cookbooks who grew so nauseated by the flavor of cilantro that she brought a pair of tweezers to mexican and indian restaurants and pinched out every last scrap of it before she would take a bite. imagine the dozens of potential julia childs and m. f. k. fishers whose books she peevishly rejected, whose careers she snuffed in their infancy! i vowed not to follow in her footsteps. suddenly, intense food preferences, whether phobias or cravings, struck me as the most serious of all personal limitations. that very day i sketched out a six step program to liberate my palate and my soul. no smells or tastes are innately repulsive, i assured myself, and what's learned can be forgot. step one was to compose an annotated list. my food phobias 1. foods i wouldn't touch even if i were starving on a desert island: none, except maybe insects. many cultures find insects highly nutritious and love their crunchy texture. the pre hispanic aztecs roasted worms in a variety of ways and made pressed caviar from mosquito eggs. this proves that no innate human programming keeps me from eating them, too. objectively, i must look as foolish as those kalahari bushmen who face famine every few years because they refuse to eat three quarters of the 223 animal species around them. i will deal with this phobia when i have polished off the easy ones. 2. foods i wouldn't touch even if i were starving on a desert island until absolutely everything else runs out: kimchi, the national pickle of korea. cabbage, ginger, garlic, and red peppers  i love them all, but not when they are fermented together for many months to become kimchi. nearly forty one million south koreans eat kimchi three times a day. they say "kimchi" instead of "cheese" when someone is taking their picture. i say, "hold the kimchi." anything featuring dill. what could be more benign than dill? swordfish. this is a favorite among the feed to succeed set, who like it grilled to the consistency of running shoes and believe it is good for them. a friend of mine eats swordfish five times a week and denies that he has any food phobias. who's kidding whom? returning obsessively to a few foods is the same as being phobic toward all the rest. this may explain the comfort food craze. but the goal of the arts, culinary or otherwise, is not to increase our comfort. that is the goal of an easy chair. during my own praline period, which lasted for three years, i would order any dessert on the menu containing caramelized hazelnuts and ignore the rest. i grew so obsessive that i almost missed out on the crème brûlée craze then sweeping the country. after my praline period had ebbed, i slid into a crème brûlée fixation, from which i forcibly wrenched myself only six months ago. anchovies. i met my first anchovy on a pizza in 1962, and it was seven years before i mustered the courage to go near another. i am known to cross the street whenever i see an anchovy coming. why would anybody consciously choose to eat a tiny, oil soaked, leathery maroon strip of rank and briny flesh? lard. the very word causes my throat to constrict and beads of sweat to appear on my forehead. desserts in indian restaurants. the taste and texture of face creams belong in the boudoir, not on the plate. see above. also: miso, mocha, chutney, raw sea urchins, and falafel (those hard, dry, fried little balls of ground chickpeas unaccountably enjoyed in middle eastern countries). 3. foods i might eat if i were starving on a desert island but only if the refrigerator were filled with nothing but chutney, sea urchins, and falafel: greek food. i have always considered "greek cuisine" an oxymoron. nations are like people. some are good at cooking while others have a talent for music or baseball or manufacturing memory chips. the greeks are really good at both pre socratic philosophy and white statues. they have not been good cooks since the fifth century b.c., when siracusa on sicily was the gastronomic capital of the world. typical of modern day greek cuisine are feta cheese and retsina wine. any country that pickles its national cheese in brine and adulterates its national wine with pine pitch should order dinner at the local chinese place and save its energies for other things. the british go to greece just for the food, which says volumes to me. you would probably think twice before buying an algerian or russian television set. i thought for ten years before buying my last greek meal. clams. i feel a mild horror about what goes on in the wet darkness between the shells of all bivalves, but clams are the only ones i dislike. is it their rubbery consistency or their rank subterranean taste, or is the horror deeper than i know? blue food (not counting plums and berries). this may be a rational aversion, because i am fairly sure that god meant the color blue mainly for food that has gone bad. also: cranberries, kidneys, okra, millet, coffee ice cream, refried beans, and many forms of yogurt. this had to stop. step two was to immerse myself in the scientific literature on human food selection. by design and by destiny, humans are omnivores. our teeth and digestive systems are all purpose and ready for anything. our genes do not dictate what foods we should find tasty or repulsive. we come into the world with a yen for sweets (newborns can even distinguish among glucose, fructose, lactose, and sucrose) and a weak aversion to bitterness, and after four months develop a fondness for salt. some people are born particularly sensitive to one taste or odor; others have trouble digesting milk sugar or wheat gluten. a tiny fraction of adults, between 1 and 2 percent, have true (and truly dangerous) food allergies. all human cultures consider fur, paper, and hair inappropriate as food. and that's about it. everything else is learned. newborns are not repelled even by the sight and smell of putrefied meat crawling with maggots. the nifty thing about being omnivores is that we can take nourishment from an endless variety of flora and fauna and easily adapt to a changing world  crop failures, droughts, herd migrations, restaurant closings, and the like. lions and tigers will starve in a salad bar, as will cows in a steak house, but not us. unlike cows, who remain well nourished eating only grass, humans need a great diversity of foods to stay healthy. yet by the age of twelve, we all suffer from a haphazard collection of food aversions ranging from revulsion to indifference. the tricky part about being omnivores is that we are always in danger of poisoning ourselves. catfish have taste buds on their whiskers, but we are not so lucky. instead, we are born with a cautious ambivalence toward novel foods, a precarious balance between neophilia and neophobia. just one bad stomach ache or attack of nausea after dinner is enough to form a potent aversion  even if the food we ate did not actually cause the problem and even if we know it didn't. hives or rashes may lead us rationally to avoid the food that caused them, but only an upset stomach and nausea will result in a lasting, irrational, lifelong sense of disgust. otherwise, psychologists know very little about the host of powerful likes and dislikes  let us lump them all under the term "food phobias"  that children carry into adulthood. by closing ourselves off from the bounties of nature, we become failed omnivores. we let down the omnivore team. god tells us in the book of genesis, right after noah's flood, to eat everything under the sun. those who ignore his instructions are no better than godless heathens. the more i contemplated food phobias, the more i became convinced that people who habitually avoid certifiably delicious foods are at least as troubled as people who avoid sex, or take no pleasure from it, except that the latter will probably seek psychiatric help, while food phobics rationalize their problem in the name of genetic inheritance, allergy, vegetarianism, matters of taste, nutrition, food safety, obesity, or a sensitive nature. the varieties of neurotic food avoidance would fill several volumes, but milk is a good place to start. overnight, everybody you meet has become lactose intolerant. it is the chic food fear of the moment. but the truth is that very, very few of us are so seriously afflicted that we cannot drink even a whole glass of milk a day without ill effects. i know several people who have given up cheese to avoid lactose. but fermented cheeses contain no lactose! lactose is the sugar found in milk; 98 percent of it is drained off with the whey (cheese is made from the curds), and the other 2 percent is quickly consumed by lactic acid bacteria in the act of fermentation. three more examples: people rid their diet of salt (and their food of flavor) to avoid high blood pressure and countless imagined ills. but no more than 8 percent of the population is sensitive to salt. only saturated fat, mainly from animals, has ever been shown to cause heart disease or cancer, yet nutrition writers and nabisco get rich pandering to the fear of eating any fat at all. the hyperactivity syndrome supposedly caused by white sugar has never, ever, been verified  and not for lack of trying. in the famous new haven study, it was the presence of the parents, not the presence of white sugar, that was causing the problem; most of the kids calmed down when their parents left the room.* i cannot figure out why, but the atmosphere in america today rewards this sort of self deception. fear and suspicion of food have become the norm. convivial dinners have nearly disappeared and with them the sense of festivity and exchange, of community and sacrament. people should be deeply ashamed of the irrational food phobias that keep them from sharing food with each other. instead, they have become proud and isolated, arrogant and aggressively misinformed. but not me. step three was to choose my weapon. food phobias can be extinguished in five ways. which one would work best for me? brain surgery. bilateral lesions made in the basolateral region of the amygdala seem to do the trick in rats and, i think, monkeys  eliminating old aversions, preventing the formation of new ones, and increasing the animals' acceptance of novel foods. but the literature does not report whether having a brain operation also diminishes their ability to, say, follow a recipe. if these experimental animals could talk, would they still be able to? any volunteers? starvation. as aristotle claimed and modern science has confirmed, any food tastes better the hungrier you are. but as i recently confessed to my doctor, who warned me to take some pill only on an empty stomach, the last time i had an empty stomach was in 1978. he scribbled "hyperphagia" on my chart, your doctor's name for making a spectacle of yourself at the table. he is a jogger. bonbons. why not reward myself with a delectable little chocolate every time i successfully polish off an anchovy, a dish of kimchi, or a bowl of miso soup? parents have used rewards ever since spinach was discovered. offering children more playtime for eating dark leafy greens may temporarily work. but offering children an extra milky way bar in return for eating more spinach has perverse results: the spinach grows more repellent and the milky way more desired. drug dependence. finicky laboratory animals find new foods more palatable after a dose of chlordiazepoxide. according to an old physicians' desk reference, this is nothing but librium, the once popular tranquilizer, also bottled as reposans and sereen. the label warns you about nausea, depression, and operating heavy machinery. i just said no. exposure, plain and simple. scientists tell us that aversions fade away when we eat moderate doses of the hated foods at moderate intervals, especially if the food is complex and new to us. (don't try this with allergies, but don't cheat either: few of us have genuine food allergies.) exposure works by overcoming our innate neophobia, the omnivore's fear of new foods that balances the biological urge to explore for them. did you know that babies who are breast fed will later have less trouble with novel foods than those who are given formula? the variety of flavors that make their way into breast milk from the mother's diet prepares the infant for the culinary surprises that lie ahead. most parents give up trying novel foods on their weanlings after two or three attempts and then complain to the pediatrician; this may be the most common cause of fussy eaters and finicky adults  of omnivores manqués. most babies will accept nearly anything after eight or ten tries. clearly, mere exposure was the only hope for me. step four was to make eight or ten reservations at korean restaurants, purchase eight or ten anchovies, search the zagat guide for eight or ten places with the names parthenon or olympia (which i believe are required by statute for greek restaurants), and bring a pot of water to the boil for cooking eight or ten chickpeas. my plan was simplicity itself: every day for the next six months i would eat at least one food that i detested. here are some of the results: kimchi. after repeatedly sampling ten of the sixty varieties of kimchi, the national pickle of korea, kimchi has become my national pickle, too. anchovies. i began relating to anchovies a few months ago in northern italy, where i ordered bagna caôda every day  a sauce of garlic, butter, olive oil, and minced anchovies served piping hot over sweet red and yellow peppers as an antipasto in piemonte. my phobia crumpled when i understood that the anchovies living in american pizza parlors bear no relation to the sweet, tender anchovies of spain and italy, cured in dry sea salt and a bit of pepper. soon i could tell a good bagna caôda from a terrific one. on my next trip to italy i will seek out those fresh charcoal grilled anchovies of the adriatic you always hear about. clams. my first assault on clams was at a diner called lunch near the end of long island, where i consumed an order of fried bellies and an order of fried strips. my aversion increased sharply. eight clams and a few weeks later it was capellini in white clam sauce at an excellent southern italian restaurant around the corner from my house. as i would do so often in the future, even at the expense of my popularity, i urged my companions to cast off their food phobias by ordering at least one dish they expected to detest. if they would go along with my experiment, i would agree to order nothing i liked. all but one agreed, a slim and lovely dancer who protested that her body tells her precisely what to eat and that i am the last person in the universe fit to interfere with those sacred messages. i replied that the innate wisdom of the body is a complete fiction when it comes to omnivores. soon i had certain proof that my friend was a major closet food phobic when she spent five minutes painstakingly separating her appetizer into two piles. the pile composed of grilled peppers, fennel, and eggplant sat lonely on the plate until her mortified husband and i polished it off. she was so disoriented by either the meal or my unsparing advice that she ate a large handful of potpourri as we waited for our coats. as for me, the evening was an unqualified success. the white clam sauce was fresh with herbs and lemon and fresh salt air, and my clam phobia was banished in the twinkling of an eye. there is a lot of banal pasta with clam sauce going around these days. if you have a clam phobia, here are two surefire solutions: order eight to ten white clam pizzas at frank pepe's in new haven, connecticut, perhaps the single best pizza in the united states and certainly the best thing of any kind in new haven, connecticut. or try the wonderful recipe for linguine with clams and gremolata in the chez panisse pasta, pizza & calzone cookbook (random house) once a week for eight consecutive weeks. it is guaranteed to work miracles. greek food. my wife, who considers herself greek food deprived, was on cloud nine when i invited her to our neighborhood greek restaurant, widely reviewed as the best in the city. as we walked along the street, she hugged me tight like those women in the tv commercials who have just been given a large diamond "for just being you" and launched into a recitation of the only classical greek she knows, something about the wrath of achilles. my own mood brightened when i saw that only one retsina befouled the wine list: the other wines were made from aboriginal greek grapes in attica or macedonia or samos but fermented in the manner of france or california. the dreaded egg and lemon soup was nowhere to be seen, and feta was kept mainly in the closet. we ordered a multitude of appetizers and three main courses. only the gluey squid, a tough grape leaf that lodged between my teeth, and the liquid smoke with which somebody had drenched the roasted eggplant threatened to arouse my slumbering phobia. the rest, most of it simply grilled with lemon and olive oil, was delicious, and as an added bonus i was launched on what still feels like an endless journey toward the acceptance of okra. later that evening, my lovely wife was kept up by an upset stomach, and i was kept up by my wife. she swore never to eat greek food again. lard. paula wolfert's magnificent the cooking of south west france (dial press) beguiled me into loving lard with her recipe for confit de porc  half pound chunks of fresh pork shoulder flavored with thyme, garlic, cloves, and pepper, poached for three hours in a half gallon of barely simmering lard, and mellowed in crocks of congealed lard for up to four months. when you bring the pork back to life and brown it gently in its own fat, the result is completely delicious, savory and aromatic. i had never made the dish myself because, following wolfert's advice, i had always avoided using commercial lard, those one pound blocks of slightly rank, preservative filled fat in your butcher's freezer. then, one snowy afternoon, i found myself alone in a room with four pounds of pork, an equal amount of pure white pig's fat, and a few hours to spare. following wolfert's simple instructions for rendering lard, i chopped up the fat, put it in a deep pot with a little water and some cloves and cinnamon sticks, popped it into a 225 degree oven, and woke up three hours later. after straining out the solids and spices, i was left with a rich, clear golden elixir that perfumed my kitchen, as it will henceforth perfume my life. desserts in indian restaurants. eight indian dinners taught me that not every indian dessert has the texture and taste of face cream. far from it. some have the texture and taste of tennis balls. these are named gulab jamun, which the menu described as a "light pastry made with dry milk and honey." rasmalai have the texture of day old bubble gum and refuse to yield to the action of the teeth. on the brighter side, i often finished my kulfi, the traditional indian ice cream, and would love to revisit carrot halva, all caramelized and spicy. but i may already have traveled down this road as far as justice requires. step five, final exam and graduation ceremony. in just six months, i succeeded in purging myself of nearly all repulsions and preferences, in becoming a more perfect omnivore. this became apparent one day in paris, france  a city to which my arduous professional duties frequently take me. i was trying a nice new restaurant, and when the waiter brought the menu, i found myself in a state unlike any i had ever attained  call it zen like if you wish. everything on the menu, every appetizer, hot and cold, every salad, every fish and bird and piece of meat, was terrifically alluring, but none more than the others. i had absolutely no way of choosing. though blissful at the prospect of eating, i was unable to order dinner. i was reminded of the medieval church parable of the ass equidistant between two bales of hay, who, because animals lack free will, starves to death. a man, supposedly, would not. the catholic church was dead wrong. i would have starved  if my companion had not saved the day by ordering for both of us. i believe i ate a composed salad with slivers of foie gras, a perfect sole meunière, and sweetbreads. everything was delicious. step six, relearning humility. just because you have become a perfect omnivore does not mean that you must flaunt it. intoxicated with my own accomplishment, i began to misbehave, especially at dinner parties. when seated next to an especially finicky eater, i would often amuse myself by going straight for the jugular. sometimes i began slyly by staring slightly too long at the food remaining on her plate and then inquiring whether she would like to borrow my fork. sometimes i launched a direct assault by asking how long she had had her terror of bread. sometimes i tricked her by striking up an abstract conversation about allergies. and then i would sit back and complacently listen to her neurotic jumble of excuses and explanations: advice from a personal trainer, intolerance to wheat gluten, a pathetic faith in dean ornish, the exquisite  even painful  sensitivity of her taste buds, hints of childhood abuse. and then i would tell her the truth. i believe that it is the height of compassion and generosity to practice this brand of tough love on dinner party neighbors who are less omnivorous than oneself. but the perfect omnivore must always keep in mind that, for one to remain omnivorous, it is an absolute necessity to get invited back. may 1989, august 1996 return to the books home page quick news | page one plus | international | national/n.y. | business | technology | science | sports | weather | editorial | op ed | arts | automobiles | books | diversions | job market | real estate | travel help/feedback | classifieds | services | new york today copyright 1997 the new york times company

edible monterey bay june 8, 2018   he appeared in my viewscape fully formed years ago, the spirit animal i didn’t know i had. we were plenty different him far more brazen, knife skilled, tatted up, sharp tongued and swashbuckling than i dared endeavor, every bit a jersey bad boy, martial artist and anti vegan but in core philosophies we clicked. there was one of them right there on the pages of kitchen confidential: adventures in the culinary underbelly the book that converted me as a follower and launched him on his trajectory toward international icon and cult worshipped star of shows like “no reservations” and “parts unknown.” “do we really want to travel in hermetically sealed popemobiles through the rural provinces of france, mexico and the far east, eating only in hard rock cafes and mcdonalds?” he writes. “or do we want to eat without fear, tearing into the local stew, the humble taqueria’s mystery meat, the sincerely offered gift of a lightly grilled fish head? i know what i want. i want it all. i want to try everything once.” kitchen confidential itself was the manifestation of a belief i held since working as a busboy at the long departed monterey joe’s on north fremont, next to the bowling alley in north monterey: that working in food service should be a prerequisite to graduating high school. it’s not just for the unique human lessons about customers and staff, though those are precious, and graphically evoked in confidential’s pages, but more so because everybody eats away from home eventually, and should understand what it’s like to be on the other side. it generates empathy, humility and respect that can’t quite be achieved otherwise. i see it in my dad, a former dishwasher, when he sneaks into the kitchen to tip the guy toiling at the sink. i recognize it in that big chip on the shoulder of ivy league educated chef michael jones, founder of cachagua general store, who reserves his most vicious venom for upper crusters who dare look down on the blue collar kids he hires and turns into world beaters one back breaking dinner shift at a time. when i became a food writer, it was not because i knew anything about food. what best qualified me to be a journalist were travels to the off the map southeast asian and obscure south american haunts bourdain celebrates, tempting fate and tastebuds at the same time. my editor bit on my first restaurant review pitch about jose’s mexican in new monterey partly because i had spent months in mexico shopping for endless peppers in local markets with my adopted abuela for her intense molés and giant pots of caldo de pollo we would gradually eat over three days with stacks of freshly pressed corn tortillas. i scoured every inch of mexico city, but with the help of bourdain’s lens, and realized i learned the most there in the kitchen with evanghelina. “food is everything we are,” he said once. “[food is] an extension of nationalist feeling, ethnic feeling, your personal history, your province, your region, your tribe, your grandma. it’s inseparable from those from the get go.” before i became a food writer, i was a tutor, teacher and uncle. i avoided decanting life advice, but one soapbox i did have was simple: travel. bourdain had that calculated and articulated. “if you’re…physically fit, hungry to learn and be better, i urge you to travel as far and as widely as possible,” goes one of bourdain’s most popular refrains. “sleep on floors if you have to. find out how other people live and eat and cook. learn from them wherever you go.” i originally fell in love with the food beat because of the flavors and experience. but i came to truly treasure it because of 1) its ubiquity: not everybody votes or watches film, but everybody eats; and 2) its heart: nobody succeeds in food without a passion for making people happy. bourdain diagnosed how he got at those elements as he accepted the prestigious peabody award for public service and media excellence in 2013. “we ask very simple questions: what makes you happy? what do you eat? what do you like to cook? and everywhere in the world we go and ask these very simple questions,” he said. “we tend to get some really astonishing answers.” ●●● one of the reasons bourdain’s apparent suicide today (june 8, 2018, at 61), in a hotel room near strasbourg, france, hit so hard is because our questions won’t get answers, astonishing or otherwise. his abiding curiosity and his relentlessly renewed beginner’s mind hinted that he had too much discovery ahead to end things now. he appeared far too hungry for more exploring. other shock from his countless fans, 7.5 million twitter followers and scores of fellow thinkers, authors and chefs, including eric ripert (who found him in the hotel), might come from the fact he has survived so much, including addiction and depravity. even confidential is a parable in resilience: when he wrote it he was well into his 40s, a full decade behind on back taxes and had yet to own a piece of furniture. plus something further his alchemy of youthful enthusiasm, fearlessness, charisma, and comfort in far flung places suggested invincibility. the news shook me more than it might have because i was already wrestling with similar tragedies. a minute before i heard word about bourdain’s death i was completing three tweets about suicide. i was moved to do so after reading and thinking about kate spade’s suicide, including this line from a time report on rising suicide rates: “research suggests that high profile suicides like spade’s can spur ‘suicide contagion,’ a known public health issue. in the months following actor robin williams’ highly publicized death by suicide in 2014, there was a 10% spike in suicides nationwide.” one of my tweets cites the hardest story i’ve ever written, about an adored carmel valley winemaker who was always there to help, smiling, generous, handsome, heartfelt, until he killed himself last year at his winemaking facility, leaving his wife, kids, staff and wider community to pick up the pieces and wonder what they could’ve done to help support him. a number of locals who are both smart and caring tried to block the story, and more took exception at something i wrote in closing the piece: [he was] strong and bronze, father and farmer, great guy and greater friend, was suffering from depression that has long haunted his family   and claimed his brother last winter   and few knew it. when someone so special, so inspiring and so helpful can be so fragile, it’s not just heart shattering, it’s humbling. that’s why i hope another one of his legacies will be a willingness to skip the stigma surrounding depression, and use this as an opportunity to talk about the ways we can help cope. like one [of his] friends told me, “it brings it full circle how vulnerable we all are.” ●●● the scariest day of my life happened not long after that winemaker’s suicide. it wasn’t a misstep cliff jumping or a near death car crash (true stories), but when i self poisoned myself on where i was in life, and how many opportunities i had f ed up. at one point i wondered with what felt like every cell in my body if could ever turn off a loop of anxious thoughts that was hamster wheeling around my brain. i got most freaked when on the basketball court, which was always before then, anyway a refuge from negative thoughts and self defeat, and the slippery panic doubled: can i stop these thoughts once they’ve started? will i ever control my head again? wait i’m on the basketball court and i can’t stop thinking like this? why am i so weak and flawed and f ed up? something happened, though, once we left the court. i knew my hoops teammate had wrestled with his own demons. so i tried, tentatively at first, talking about mine. it got a lot easier as he nodded, began to identify and talked me through his experience. i don’t know what bourdain was dealing with, and don’t pretend to. i do know that talking with my basketball buddy shocked me in how much lighter i felt, in a hurry. that feeling deepened when i confided in other friends. my demons aren’t dead. but neither am i. a painful irony struck me in composing this piece: even as he had so many people like me listening intently to his travelogues, maybe bourdain didn’t feel like he had someone who could listen to his problems. a passage from confidential seems a little too prescient: “[when i die], i will decidedly not be regretting missed opportunities for a good time. my regrets will be more along the lines of a sad list of people hurt, people let down, assets wasted and advantages squandered.” ●●● the last four months i’ve been channeling bourdain in a major way, living to travel and understand through food. two days ago my former employer marveled at my “anthony bourdain existence.” a day previous i quoted bourdain’s one word twitter profile when seeking a way to describe my approach to food and drink reporting: not critic, but “enthusiast.” in traveling around asia, africa and europe, i’ve had his mantras finding their way to my mind, including, “sometimes the greatest meals on vacations are the ones you find when plan a falls through.” of late i’ve spent meals in some world class restaurants in bangkok, thailand, and split, croatia. but the best meals have been sitting on the floor with afghan refugees in kuala lumpur, malaysia, and a family mourning its patriarch in ha long bay, vietnam. food and identity were indistinguishable. as bourdain says, “food is everything we are.” along these travels i’ve explored some of the most spellbinding temples ever created including one in chiang mai made completely of sculpted silver and unesco world heritage sites like croatia’s plitvice lakes and its surreal turquoise waterfalls. but the real pilgrimages have been for food, at places id’d by one anthony bourdain. that included a stop at chiang mai’s cowboy hat lady food stand (actual name khao kha moo chang) for super bare bones khao kha moo pork leg with rice, pitchers of spicy sauce and whole cloves of garlic that resonate with another bourdain motto (“good food is very often, even most often, simple food”). it also involved a visit to a new hanoi landmark in the same country bourdain called “life changing,” in channeling graham greene’s the quiet american: “they say whatever you’re looking for, you will find here…the smell: that’s the first thing that hits you, promising everything in exchange for your soul.” i ate where he and president barack obama toasted local beers at a place called bun cha huong lien. it was touristy and so crowded an oblivious tour guide might as well have been sitting on my shoulder for half of my lunch, but despite that and the long walk across the city to get there, i was experiencing deliverance because i was in a place two paradigm shifters shared a meal and another bourdain principle: “you learn a lot about someone when you share a meal together.” bun cha involves a mountain of white rice noodles, grilled fatty pork, a jungle of aromatic herbs and dipping sauce. with the obama special at huong lien, it also comes with a beer and a rich shrimp and pork roll the kind of meal that didn’t seem like an end is imaginable. bourdain’s end was hard to imagine too, and will take a while to sink in, if it ever does. while he might’ve ended his episode to head into the ultimate parts unknown, his contributions will live on, as will so many wanderings he inspired, including my own. as much as he changed the way we looked at restaurants and set the table for reimagining of chefs as renegades and rock stars while advocating for immigrant, restaurant worker and women’s rights his greatest contribution is that reverence for identity through food, without sacrificing his playful irreverence. the playful part: “total cost of bun cha dinner with the president: $6.00,” he tweeted from hanoi. “i picked up the check.” his irreverent reminder, with that kick of ever present perspective: “i, personally, think there is a really danger of taking food too seriously. food should be part of the bigger picture.” fortunately there is no danger of his influence going anywhere. another chef with prodigious perspective put it best: “rip doubtful,” tom colicchio tweeted today. “tony’s restless spirit will roam the earth in search of justice, truth and a great bowl of noodles.” so no rip needed. just more exploring. for him, but also for us. mark c. anderson is a freelance writer and editor based in seaside, california, who is nativating the world via food, drink and a pioneering work travel program called remote year. he is currently in split, croatia. reach him via montereymcacreative@gmail.com. mark c. anderson is emb's managing editor, a member of monterey county food system coalition and a weekly guest on krml radio's "found treasures" every friday a little after 12pm noon. reach him via mark@ediblemontereybay.com or instagram. digital editiontext edition at edible monterey bay, our mission is to celebrate the local food cultures of santa cruz, san benito and monterey counties, season by season. we believe in sustainability, and that everyone has a right to healthful, clean and affordable food. we think knowing where our food comes from is a powerful thing, and we hope our magazine, website and events will inspire readers to get to know and support our local growers, fishers, chefs, vintners and food artisans. emb is one of 80+ magazines in the award winning and beloved edible communities family. the edibles span north america, but each is locally owned and run. we hope you enjoy all that we have to offer, and we look forward to hearing from you!

ruth reichl says that the best career moves are the ones that scare you. first a cook, then a critic and a memoirist, and then the editor of gourmet until its abrupt closure, in 2009, she’s learned to embrace transition. when her latest venture, the luxury food site gilt taste, was also shut down, she turned to fiction writing. her novel, delicious!, is out now.

supported by critic’s notebook pete wells is moving on from his role as the times restaurant critic, a job with many rewards and maybe too many courses. by pete wells early this year, i went for my first physical in longer than i’d care to admit. at the time, i was about halfway through a list of 140 or so restaurants i planned to visit before i wrote the 2024 edition of “the 100 best restaurants in new york city.” it was a fair bet that i wasn’t in the best shape of my life. my scores were bad across the board; my cholesterol, blood sugar and hypertension were worse than i’d expected even in my doomiest moments. the terms pre diabetes, fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome were thrown around. i was technically obese. ok, not just technically. i knew i needed to change my life. i promised i’d start just as soon as i’d eaten in the other 70 restaurants on my spreadsheet. but a funny thing happened when i got to the end of all that eating: i realized i wasn’t hungry. and i’m still not, at least not the way i used to be. and so, after 12 years as restaurant critic for the new york times, i’ve decided to bow out as gracefully as my state of technical obesity will allow. not that i’m leaving the newsroom. i have a couple more restaurant reviews in my back pocket that will appear over the next few weeks, and i plan to stick around at the times long after that. but i can’t hack the week to week reviewing life anymore.

what may happen when you can’t say “no” to someone.. one of the best stories i’ve read.. i caught sight of her at the play and in answer to her beckoning i went over during the interval and sat down beside her. it was long since i had last seen her and if someone had not mentioned her name, i hardly think i would have recognized her. she addressed me brightly. “well, its many years since we first met. how time does fly! we’re none of us getting any younger. do you remember the first time i saw you? you asked me to luncheon.” did i remember? it was twenty years ago and i was living in paris. i had a tiny apartment in the latin quarter overlooking a cemetery and i was earning barely enough money to keep body and soul together. she had read a book of mine and had written to me about it. i answered, thanking her, and presently i received from her another letter saying she was passing through paris and would like to have a chat with me; but her time was limited and the only free moment she had was on the following thursday; she was spending the morning at the luxembourg and would i give her a little luncheon at foyot’s afterwards? foyot’s is a restaurant at which the french senators eat and it was so far beyond my means that i had never even thought of going there. but i was flattered and i was too young to have learned to say no to a woman. (few men, i may add, learn this until theyare too old to make it of any consequence to a woman what they say.) i had eighty francs (gold francs) to last me the rest of the month and a modest luncheon should not cost more than fifteen. if i cut out coffee for the next two weeks i could manage well enough. i answered that i would meet my friend by correspon­dence at foyot’s on thursday at half past twelve. she was not so young as i expected and in appearance imposing rather than attractive. she was in fact a woman of forty (a charming age, but not one that excites a sudden and devastating passion at first sight), and she gave me the impression of having more teeth, white and large and even, than were necessary for any practical purpose. she was ‘ talkative, but since she seemed inclined to talk about me i was prepared to be an attentive listener. i was startled when the bill of fare was brought, for, the prices were a great deal higher than i had anticipated. but she reassured me. “i never eat anything for luncheon”, she said. “oh, don’t say that!” i answered generously. “i never eat more than one thing. i think people eat far too much nowadays. a little fish, perhaps. i wonder if they have any salmon.” well, it was early in the year for salmon and it was not on the bill of fare, but i asked the waiter if there was, any. yes, a beautiful salmon had just come in, it was the first they had had. i ordered it for my guest.the waiter asked her if she would have something while it was being cooked. “no”, she answered, “i never eat more than one thing, unless you had a little caviare. i never mind caviare.” my heart sank a little. i knew i could not afford caviare, but i could not very well tell her that. i told the waiter by all means to bring caviare. for myself i chose the cheapest dish on the menu and that was a mutton chop. “i think you’re unwise to eat meat,” she said. “i don’t know how you can expect to work after eating heavy things like chops. i don’t believe in overloading my stomach.” then came the question of drink. “i never drink anything for luncheon,” she said. “neither do i,” i answered promptly. “except white wine,” she proceeded as though i had not spoken. “these french white wines are so light. they’re wonderful for the digestion.” “what would you like?” i asked, hospitable still, but not exactly effusive. she gave me a bright and amicable flash of her white teeth. “my doctor won’t let me drink anything but cham­pagne.” i fancy i turned a trifle pale. i ordered half a bottle. i mentioned casually that my doctor had absolutely forbid­den me to drink champagne. “what are you going to drink, then?” “water.” she ate the caviare and she ate the salmon. she talked gaily of art and literature and music. but i wondered what the bill would come to. when my mutton chop arrived she took me quite seriously to task. “i see that you’re in the habit of eating a heavy luncheon. i’m sure it’s a mistake. why don’t you follow my example and just eat one thing? i’m sure you’d feel ever so much better for it.” “i am only going to eat one thing,” i said as the waiter came again with the bill of fare. she waved him aside with an airy gesture. “no, no, i never eat anything for luncheon. just a bite, i never want more than that, and i eat that more as an excuse for conversation than anything else. i couldn’t possibly eat anything more unless they had some of those giant asparagus. i should be sorry to leave paris without having some of them.” my heart sank. i had seen them in the shops and i knew that they were horribly expensive. my mouth had often watered at the sight of them. “madame wants to know if you have any of those giant asparagus,” i asked the waiter. i tried with all my might to will him to say no. a happy smile spread over his broad, priest like face, and he assured me that they had some so large, so splendid, so tender, that it was a marvel. “i’m not in the least hungry,” my guest sighed, “but if you insist i don’t mind having some asparagus.” i ordered them. “aren’t you going to have any?” “no, i never eat asparagus.” “i know there are people who don’t like them. the fact is, you ruin your palate by all the meat you eat.” we waited for the asparagus to be cooked. panic seized me. it was not a question now how much money i should have left over for the rest of the month, but whether i had enough to pay the bill. it would be mortifying to find myself ten francs short and be obliged to borrow from my guest. i could not bring myself to do that. i knew exactly how much i had and if the bill came to more i made up my mind that i would put my hand in my pocket and with a dramatic cry start up and say it had been picked. of course it would be awkward if she had not money enough either to pay the bill. then the only thing would be to leave my watch and say i would come back and pay later. the asparagus appeared. they were enormous, succu­lent and appetising. the smell of the melted butter tickled my nostrils as the nostrils of jehovah were tickled by the burned offerings of the virtuous semites. i watched the abandoned woman thrust them down her throat in large voluptuous mouthful and in my polite way i discoursed on the condition of the drama in the balkans. at last shefinished. “coffee?” i said. “yes, just an ice cream and coffee,” she answered. i was past caring now, so i ordered coffee for myself and an ice cream and coffee for her. “you know, there’s one thing i thoroughly believe in”, she said, as she ate the ice cream. “one should always get up from a meal feeling one could eat a little more.” “are you still hungry?” i asked faintly. “oh, no, i’m not hungry, you see, i don’t eat luncheon. i have a cup of coffee in the morning and then dinner, but i never eat more than one thing for luncheon. i was speaking for you.” “oh, i see” then a terrible thing happened. while we were waiting for the coffee, the head waiter, with an ingratiating smile on his false face, came up to us bearing a large basket full of huge peaches. they had the blush of an innocent girl; they had the rich tone of an italian landscape. but surely peaches were not in season then? lord knew what they cost. i knew too a little later, for my guest, going on with her conversation, absentmindedly took one. “you see, you’ve filled your stomach with a lot of meat” my one miserable little chop ”and you can’t eat any more. but i’ve just had a snack and i shall enjoy a peach.” the bill came and when i paid it i found that i had only enough for a quite inadequate tip. her eyes rested for an instant on the three francs i left for the waiter and i knew that she thought me mean. but when i walked out of therestaurant i had the whole month before me and not a penny in my pocket. “follow my example,” she said as we shook hands, “and never eat more than one thing for luncheon.” “i’ll do better than that,” i retorted, “i’ll eat nothing for dinner to night.” “humorist!” she cried gaily, jumping into a cab. “you’re quite a humorist!” but i have had my revenge at last. i do not believe that i am a vindictive man, but when the immortal gods take a hand in the matter it is pardonable to observe the result with complacency. today she weighs twenty one stone. love maugham! pingback: home reading | englishteacher570 may control of flattering to meet any female . love somerset maugh for remembering story’long life δdocument.getelementbyid( "ak_js_1" ).setattribute( "value", ( new date() ).gettime() ); enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. email address: follow

the blog of author tim ferriss tim ferriss is the author of five #1 new york times bestsellers and host of the tim ferriss show podcast. my first handwritten brainstorm for the 4 hour chef, here in a signed copy of the art of simple food by the inimitable alice waters.    “don’t be intimidated by the red. you’re all good writers.” i remember professor john mcphee saying this when he handed back our first weekly writing assignment. we were 12 or so college seniors in “the literature of fact,” his once in a blue moon seminar at princeton university. the red was pulitzer prize winning mcphee’s edits and deletions. each of us looked down in shock. in some cases, his suggestions exceeded our own black text. over the subsequent weeks, our writing tightened. oddly, as the red shrank, as the flowery adjectives and filler disappeared, my grades in every other class shot skyward. what i learned: writing is the fastest way to improve your thinking. this carry over is enough reason to put pen to paper, even if you never intend to publish. just a week or two of writing for friends can work wonders and produce breakthroughs. the author of the following article is jeannette ferrary. i wanted to include this piece in the 4 hour chef but, alas, i had to remove more than 250 pages due to space constraints, including gems like this, a nutritional profile of ufc champion gsp, interviews with the incredible chef wylie dufresne, and more. but you’re in for a treat. jeannette is a food writer for the new york times who has contributed to everything from bon appetit to gastronomica, reviewing restaurants and penning features. she is the author of eight books related to food, including biographies, memoirs, and cookbooks. she also teaches writing courses at stanford university. last but not least, jeannette studied cooking with simone beck and julia child in châteauneuf de grasse, france. in other words, she knows both food and writing inside and out. here are her lessons learned… i like to begin my food writing courses with a quote about eating an apple that makes everyone’s mouth water. it also often generates a nostalgic tear in the eye because, well, read for yourself: “i know the look of an apple that is roasting and sizzling on a hearth on a winter’s evening, and i know the comfort that comes of eating it hot, along with some sugar and a drench of cream. i know the delicate art and mystery of so cracking hickory nuts and walnuts on a flatiron with a hammer that the kernels will be delivered whole, and i know how the nuts, taken in conjunction with winter apples, cider and doughnuts, make old people’s tales and old jokes sound fresh and crisp and enchanting…” the fun begins as people try to guess the words’ author: a culinary memoirist perhaps, one of those journalist chefs we read only on wednesdays; the blogger du jour? whoever it is, one thing is clear: the person knows how to write. so maybe you love food and your great aunt has left a bunch of yellowing recipe cards that you want to transform into a cookbook spiced with family stories and heritage. or maybe you’re obsessed with those hatch chiles from new mexico and you want to expose their specialness and wonders to the wider world. or your dream is to become the restaurant reviewer for the new york times. you might begin by starting a blog of your own, investigating writing assignments in publications you respect, taking a writing course or a cooking class, getting involved with a culinary organization where you can interact with food world people on a peer level. but there’s something more basic that you have to do: you have to write what you love. what are you interested in? what fascinates you? it’s a good idea to become obsessed with whatever it is so you can happily lose yourself in your subject and maybe drive everyone around you crazy with your enthusiasm. when you’re writing what you care about, it shows. there’s an energy and vibrancy and sensuousness to your work that you can’t fake. it will sound like you and nobody else, which makes it valuable and unique. i know, i know: you want to know how to become a great food writer. so here’s a little story: on my first trip to france almost 30 years ago, i went to a restaurant in cannes called lyonnaise provençal which offered a four course meal for eighteen francs, or about four dollars. because this was my first real meal in france, i allowed myself the splurge of an extra two and a half francs for a quarter liter of wine. the squid arrived in a boat shaped dish under a dark tomatoey sauce rich with herbs and with something deeper to say, something more profound than a tomato’s usual discourse. carrot provençal was just strips of sweet carrot with orange zest and lots of small but important olives. salade appeared as a simple bunch of leaves with a surprising message: lettuce can have taste. the cheese course was accurately if too audibly described by an unmistakably american guy a few tables away: “the camembert,” he repeatedly informed his dining partner and everyone else in the room, “is dynamite.” so why should you care? because here’s the point of all this: take notes. these events led directly to the publication of the first article of my food writing career. more recently i used specifics such as these in many chapters of my memoir, out of the kitchen: adventures of a food writer. if you want to be a writer whose work is lit up and energized by the telling detail and the palpable freshness of the moment, get yourself a nice, little easy to carry notebook. and don’t leave home without it. oh, and read as much excellent food writing as you can find, like that in the first paragraph. that would be mark twain, by the way. in other words, great food writing is…great writing. simple as that. [about the author: for more on and by jeannette, please visit her site.] tim: it’s me again. i have a lot of thoughts on writing, perhaps because i find it so damn hard. here are a few things i’ve loved and learned since 2005. bird by bird: some lessons on writing and life   if you spend a lot of time working alone, this book is required reading. it has saved my sanity countless times, and it has done the same for several friends who’ve gone from the deadline hell of “i want to quit” to the new york times bestseller list. out of the kitchen: adventures of a food writer   this memoir, by the author of this post, traces her journey from youthful ambivalence about food (“women’s work”) to food writer for the new york times. in the process, a number of legendary cooks and personalities make guest appearances, including simone beck, craig claiborne, alice waters, judy rodgers, julia child, and jacques pepin. the stanford d. school “show don’t tell” design thinking bootcamp   how do you create the most powerful story arc, whether written or visual? these fascinating (and free) presentations will kick your creativity into high gear for unique and compelling story structure. professor jennifer aaker’s “how to tell a story” class   at the very least, try the six word story exercise. hemingway made it famous with what he called his best work: “for sale: baby shoes, never worn.” hat tip to avi solomon for pointing me to this. from first tv to dr. oz: how to get local and national media   this post includes the actual query (pitch) i emailed to wired magazine that landed a 4 page plus feature piece. how to build a high traffic blog without killing yourself   this article explains how i went from 1 blog reader (thanks, mom!) to more than 1,000,000 monthly readers by doing the unconventional (e.g., posting once every 3 4 weeks instead of daily). in the accompanying keynote from the annual wordcamp conference, and using my own blog as a case study, i explain best practices, debunk blogging myths, and cover how to harness data for better results. for the record, i suggest first time bloggers use wordpress.com as a blogging platform. it’s the most google friendly (search rankings) out of the box, and i’ve found it easiest to use. david lebovitz   food blogging tips from david lebovitz, former pastry chef at chez panisse and author of six books. food blog alliance   how to examples for food bloggers (recipe attribution, shooting food videos, etc.). 12 lessons learned marketing the 4 hour body   this is a step by step explanation of everything behind the launch of the 4 hour body, which ended up hitting #1 new york times and outselling the 4 hour workweek 5 to 1. if you’re curious about what it takes to keep a book on the bestseller lists for more than four years unbroken, this will give you a rare behind the scenes picture. as of this writing, i’m also the only author besides suzanne collins (hunger games) to have two books in the top 10 of the kindle “most highlighted books of all time.” publishers lunch   the publishing industry’s daily email digest of deals. learn about books up to a year before they hit the shelves: what sold to which publishers, which agents sold them, and <gasp> how big the advances were. if you’re hoping to sell a book (non fiction is best sold before it’s written), this is where to find agents who rep your genre of book, and to discover who is good at creating bidding wars for the big bucks. by no means an exhaustive list, here are a few short stories and books that have inspired me. each represents a different genre. consider them a starting point: brigade de cuisine is a new yorker short story and profile by john mcphee. if you want a taste of why mcphee’s writing makes me cry into a pillow about my own, try this or coming into the country. heat: an amateur cook in a professional kitchen is a narrative autobiography by bill buford. i quote this book like mad. it’s absolutely hysterical and one of my all time favorites. the style is reminiscent of george plimpton, another of my idols. how to cook a wolf is a depression era autobiography with interspersed recipes, both by m.f.k. fisher. yes, i’ve now recommended this book twice. go get it. like water for chocolate (como agua para chocolate) is award winning fiction by laura esquivel. if you like this and want more foodie fiction, try mistress of spices next. best food writing 2005, 2006, etc. this is an annual anthology of good food writing compiled by holly hughes, who pulls from newspapers, books, magazines, blogs, and more. contributors range from ruth reichl and anthony bourdain to jonathan safran foer and j. kenji lopez alt. there’s something for everyone and the pieces are, ahem, bite sized for easy consumption. the tim ferriss show is one of the most popular podcasts in the world with more than one billion downloads. it has been selected for "best of apple podcasts" three times, it is often the #1 interview podcast across all of apple podcasts, and it's been ranked #1 out of 400,000+ podcasts on many occasions. to listen to any of the past episodes for free, check out this page. δdocument.getelementbyid( "ak_js_1" ).setattribute( "value", ( new date() ).gettime() ); δdocument.getelementbyid( "ak_js_2" ).setattribute( "value", ( new date() ).gettime() ); comment rules: remember what fonzie was like? cool. that’s how we’re gonna be   cool. critical is fine, but if you’re rude, we’ll delete your stuff. please do not put your url in the comment text and please use your personal name or initials and not your business name, as the latter comes off like spam. have fun and thanks for adding to the conversation! (thanks to brian oberkirch for the inspiration.) wow, thanks for all the great links  i’ll be bookmarking this. this also brought back memories of creative writing classes in high school and college with the red marks galore. it reminds me there’s always room for improvement in everything i write, even today. i’m new to your blog, and this post is a great start for me. as i begin to go through these links, i thank you for this post! yes! i’ve been waiting to hear your thoughts on food blogging for a long time now. thanks for the great post, and helpful links! great article, i love the book, just made some fantastic osso buko! thanks man just as there are qualitative differences in writing, there are qualitative differences in thinking. are they related? i believe so… “what i learned: writing is the fastest way to improve your thinking.”   agreed. your timing works out perfectly. jumping into writing just recently. thanks for the additional push! i am on the process of writing my first book. although it is tech book (reporting in sql server 2012), i can certainly use the tips here! more power, tim! by the way, my 4 hour chef book arrived today from amazon! i’m so into meta learning!!! great post. in the intro, you mentioned you did a nutritional profile of gsp. i can only imagine. the guy’s a machine! i’d love to see it. will we be able to find that anywhere? tim this post is not showing up from the homepage of your blog, just fyi. correction, at the *top of your blog. tim, in the notes above you mention bpa and microwaves. i can’t find any reference to this bisphenol a in the four hour chef or the four hour body. i’m interested to hear your thoughts on the preliminary data on bpa. thanks,  jd you should include “on writing well” by william zinsser on the list of writing books. http://www.amazon.com/writing well 30th anniversary nonfiction/dp/0060891548 show, don’t tell. you’ve proven meta learning by learning photography in order to make a great book. well done. great post tim! i enjoyed this post so much. i need to get jeanette’s book asap. i really enjoyed her perspective on writing whether on food or about anything else that you are passionate about. i love her quote, “great food writing is…great writing. simple as that.” btw, i am so impressed that you are an annie lamott fan. i always loved her writing especially operating instructions and bird by bird. you are truly a renaissance man! “what i learned: writing is the fastest way to improve your thinking.” so true, and also to lose your fear of writing. as a high school slacker and having written a grand total of one paper in those four years, yes really, (and i did graduate, barely), i wrote my first book just to see if i could actually write 200 pages of anything. it was a horrible grueling intimidating process. editing is worse, by the way. but, now i have no fear what so ever of writing the next one. marketing it, that still scares me! always look toward the next hurdle. cheers. finding words to describe food and the food experience is mind expanding because you’re taking the sense of taste, and finding words to match that experience. teaching kids to appreciate and describe food from an early age is a wonderful gift parents can give to enrich the lives of their children. yay! mark twain was my guess. btw, got 4hc on my x mas wish list and translating it to german on my 2013 work wish list. great stuff! thanks for the link to the design thinking bootcamp. “show, don’t tell” is a great guideline. i’ve done ghostwriting work in just about every niche besides food writing, but this makes me want to give it a try. that paragraph on french food alone is making me hungry! thanks for the interesting insight 🙂 tim, thanks for sharing jeannette’s work. i so value the point of sharing your passion because it shows in your writing! i have that in the forefront of everything i do now. many thanks. bon appetit “what i learned: writing is the fastest way to improve your thinking.” this is gold, my friend. thanks! first of all tim and jeannette, thanks for the words of wisdom. as a food and nutrition blogger, it’s posts like these help the learning curve to not be quite so steep. tim, please, please, pretty please, post george st. pierre’s nutritional profile at some point. i’m sorry it didn’t make the cut, but it will make for a great post! i second alison on this. please post the gsp profile! 🙂 it would be great to see the extra 250 pages as a digital supplement to the 4 hour chef. perhaps you could release them as (a) kindle single(s). i would be very interested in the gsp article. tim ferris, as soon as you finish promoting the 4 hour chef, you got to start writing the 4 hour marketing! there are so many genius ideas and spectacular resoults that you simply cant keep us stripped of all this knowledge! fantastic work! 250 pages cut?? you need to come out with a 4 hour chef 2. an “odds and ends” followup if you will…. i read bird by bird on your suggestion, it’s not until you mention it now that i realised writing was improving the way i think. cheers i read bird by bird on your suggestion, it’s not until you mention it now that i realised writing was improving the way i think. cheers. one of your plugins is detecting duplicate comments, though this is my first post! hi tim, i can’t wait to get my hands on the new book! (have both previous) ordered on amazon.ca nov 27th, got an update today that it won’t be shipped until jan 8th to feb 4th! lol…. wish i could have it as my xmas gift! cheers, all the best p.s sincere congrats on the nyt bestseller achievement! you deserve it! tim, you are a badass version of sheldon cooper. jeannette, i like the admonition for writers to never leave home without a good notebook. i need to start doing that. we’re much more likely to be able to capture the colorful details of an (expected and unexpected) important event or place or person if we take down notes in the moment than we are if we’re recalling it from memory days later. since this post contains lots of writing tips from both jeannette and tim, i thought i’d share a couple that i’ve found helpful in my six years of writing professionally. this quote from anton checkhov colorfully demonstrates the “show, don’t tell” approach: “don’t tell me the moon is shining; show me the glint of light on broken glass.” the best book on writing that i’ve read is “style: toward clarity and grace,” by joseph williams. it can get pretty technical (not in terms of its prose, but rather its content), but it’s well worth forging through. he analyzes what makes a good sentence and then what combination of sentences make a good paragraph, for example. also, tim, good list of writing resources. i will have to study them further. i’m not a food writer, but many of your thoughts can work for any topic. know how to write well and know your topic well. i love the idea: writing things down makes you improve your thinking process. sounds cool   i think it’s true! tim   as i look to find my voice/vocation/my craft i find myself going from zealous motivation to deep discouragement and self loathing (as far as writing is concerned). i don’t want to marginalize the journey of linking passion to craft, talent to skill. any suggestions/best practices on how to sustain the peaks of motivation and mitigate the valleys of feeling hopeless on writing this journey? thanks for all the resources and killer content brudda. dan: jarabacoa, dominican republic :: 12.5.2012 will the book four hour chef be available to download on the ipad soon? not at all on point, but i would like to reiterate the hope of seeing the gsp information online. still working my way through the book … hey tim, i am reading 4 hour chef; and i wanted to answer one of the questions you had; about salt. salted water “cleans” vegetables etc.. better because; most particulates are positively charged; that is why a negative ionizer cleans the air. that holds true for particulates that are attached to fruits and vegetables; when you submerge them in water with a little bit of salt; you are submerging them in an ionized environment; and so electromagnetically, dirt is coming off by itself without harsh scrubbing. taking this knowledge one step further; if you have tupperware or glass containers that was holding something strong (like garlic) for a while and you can’t get the smell out no matter how many times you wash it; dissolve a fairly large amount of salt into hot water; pour the hot water in the container; and let it stand for a day or two. the ionized state of the salt water will pull all the aroma out of the plastic/glass and you will have a scent free vessel in a day or two. hope that helps! man this is priceless information! such a great resource, bookmarked now! thanks for sharing, jeannette and tim! and thanks for all the resources! i am especially interested in the design thinking bootcamp, which is free awesome! also tim, are we going to see the gsp nutritional profile on this blog? i’m re inspired to sit down and write it out, old school. tell a story with pen and paper, not just sitting in front of the screen trying to bust out the facts and motivate my reader…but share a story. thanks tim   great piece! thank you for the advice. this is so helpful! pretty nice post. i just stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to say that i’ve truly enjoyed browsing your blog posts. bonjour tim, congrats on hitting your 1000 mark on amazon ratings. i saw also that you were number 26 on hard cover and 5ooish on the ebook. i often wonder if they had an over all sales for the book how things would change. i obviously look a lot for my own books. i am also a polyglot and jack of many trades, but only in the top 20%, you have inspired me to become part of the world class top 5%. all the best and thanks for the great meta learning tips in the 4hc, (by the way i shot a banana opening video a couple years ago opening the it from the same side as the guy in the video, but you hold it like a joy stick   then nstead of pinching … you press down on the black part and there is a natural air pocket that makes a little pop and the seam splits making it easy to then peal away. the cool part though is the pop. type lucralover and rethink bananas, if you want to see it on youtube. peace, love and a brilliant 2013 to you! greg ps did you like my email address? i am starting your slow carb diet and there doesn’t seem anywhere to ask questions so this is the best area i can find. can you eat the following foods? corn kidney beans cheese for mexican food sour cream hi, im from brazil, here is impossible to find alicin. does exisist somthing that a can use in substituition? thank you very much. gabriel bueno so i am admittedly a bit behind on this one… one quick comment i had though: tim, you are fantastic at writing about food. i have trouble putting the four hour chef down, not even because of the content itself, but because of how you bring the ideas to life, whether it is a recipe, a method for building a fire, or a guide to learning a language. you inject your experience into the learning process. that’s what makes a great teacher or instructor. cheers! everything is very open with a very clear explanation of the challenges. it was truly informative. your website is very helpful. many thanks for sharing! i just wanted to say a big thank you. i found this site very inspiring. i have always been a prolific writer, and love the sensory world of writing. it has only been in the last year however that my love of cooking and food became part of my daily job where i create recipes for a global company and in the process have been compiling various cook books. but because i’m your everyday woman and not a celebrity, i was finding it difficult thinking about how i could bring these books to life. i can’t believe how dappy i’ve been not to realise my passion for creative writing and my love of food and cooking could marry so well. i have a lot to learn and to read! but thanks to your site i know which direction to take and where to come if i need inspiration. thank you 🙂 great information and great links, thanks for posting them. i’ve been a part time food writer for two years working for a local newspaper on food articles and interviews with chefs and it is fulfilling. i have a resource to add to your list that helped me get my first article. it is a book by a restaurant critic (s.j. sebellin ross) called “how to write about food: how to become a published restaurant critic, food journalist, cookbook author, and food blogger.” i also recommend googling how to write about food. it is how i found this page! here’s another book for the list: how to write about food: how to become a published restaurant critic, food journalist, cookbook author, and food blogger by s.j. sebellin ross. it was helpful and practical which is just what i needed.now, i’m off to try some of the books on your list! hi! i am tom . i am new to your blog and this post really help me a lot as i’ve just started. i am going to bookmark all the links. thanks for sharing this. good to find you. i appreciate this site is an amazon associate and purchases through amazon links may earn an affiliate commission.

'you only live once, but if you do it right, once is enough'  mae west copyright © 2024 pavle milić   all rights reserved.

that is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather skip to content moderators: the preacher, $iljanus, zaxxon post by mythicalmino » sat sep 03, 2011 8:15 am post by mythicalmino » sat sep 03, 2011 8:16 am post by mythicalmino » sat sep 03, 2011 9:25 am return to “gaming in general” powered by phpbb® forum software © phpbb limited privacy | terms

something went wrong. wait a moment and try again.
on the face of it, food writing seems to be about, well, food. but slice a bit deeper, and you realize it’s about so much more; it’s about culture, people and humanity. good stories about food tell the stories of the people who are honoring their grandmother, their culture, their own history or their people’s history through the food they’re making. these are the kinds of stories brett anderson has been telling for more than two decades. the 49 year old minnesota native is one of america’s preeminent modern food writers. he has penned north of 1,000 articles, has three james beard awards to his name and is credited with creating the watershed moment of 2017 (more on that later). his admirers know him from his years as restaurant critic at new orleans’ times picayune, and now he’s signed on for a stint with the new york times, among other projects. but let’s back up a bit. growing up, anderson didn’t aspire to become a food writer. he wasn’t even what you might consider a foodie. “for starters, i grew up privileged,” he explains. “my father was a politician, so he was a person of influence, but neither of my parents came from privilege. we did not grow up gourmets or avid restaurant goers, but we ate well.” his dad of course was hockey player turned politician wendell anderson, minnesota’s 33rd governor, who served in the seventies. he then served in the u.s. senate for a couple years after walter mondale vacated his spot, having been elected vice president under jimmy carter. wendy, as he was known, is remembered for helping the u.s. hockey team secure a silver medal at the 1956 winter olympics, creating the 1971 tax reform dubbed the minnesota miracle and touting “the good life in minnesota” on the cover of time magazine in 1973. (that cover story extolled the land of 10,000 lakes as a “state that works,” noting that “if the american good life has anywhere survived in some intelligent equilibrium, it may be in minnesota.”) he died in 2016 at the age of 83 due to complications of alzheimer’s disease. but back to the younger anderson. brett remembers dining out with his family at the lexington, which was around the corner from the governor’s mansion: “my dad would show up, walk through the backdoor, and sit at a table with his handlers and deal with business. but it was also a time for cocktails, steak and walleye.”