What Are New York’s Food Pantries Like Right Now? Tell Us.
We want to know how New Yorkers of all incomes are handling the challenges in getting food during the pandemic.
Supported byWhat Are New York’s Food Pantries Like Right Now? Tell Us.We want to know how New Yorkers of all incomes are handling the challenges in getting food during the pandemic.ByNikita StewartandElaine ChenWith spiking unemployment in New York City, the need for food assistance has only grown. Food pantries across the country are seeing a surge of demand.But like many businesses, food banks are grappling with disruptions in supplies and workers. Almost 40 percent of delivery sites in New York City have closed. There are people going to food pantries for the first time, and regular customers dealing with changing hours and locations.We asked readers to share their stories, which helped inform this reporting.Nikita Stewartis the editor of real estate at The Times.More about Nikita StewartElaine Chenjoined The Times in 2017 from WNYC public radio. Before media, she was a lawyer for the New York City government. She now works on Times events.More about Elaine Chen
[{"title": "What Are New York's Food Pantries Like Right Now? Tell Us.", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/22/reader-center/new-york-food-pantry-covid-callout.html"}, {"title": "", "link": "https://access.nyc.gov/programs/emergency-food-assistance/#:~:text=Use%20the%20Food%20Help%20NYC,how%20much%20money%20you%20have."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.feedwm.org/2023/01/food-bank-101-everything-you-need-to-know-about-food-banks/#:~:text=Food%20banks%20and%20food%20pantries,need%20to%20do%20their%20work."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.nycfoodpolicy.org/nyc-by-the-numbers-food-insecure-households-pantries/#:~:text=The%20Food%20Bank%20for%20NYC,total)%20across%20all%20five%20boroughs."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://dhs.lacounty.gov/our-services/resources/food/#:~:text=To%20get%20help%20on%20food,for%20benefits%20at%20BenefitsCal.com."}, {"title": "Hunger in NYC", "link": "https://www.cityharvest.org/hunger-in-nyc/"}, {"title": "Food Pantries", "link": "https://www.nyc.gov/site/dycd/services/food_pantries.page"}, {"title": "Food Rescue", "link": "https://nycommonpantry.org/food-rescue/"}, {"title": "Find Food | Food Bank For New York City", "link": "https://www.foodbanknyc.org/get-help/"}, {"title": "NYC Food Pantries: How they are Helping our City + How ...", "link": "https://brooklynslifestyle.com/nyc-food-pantries-how-they-are-helping-our-city-how-you-can-help/"}, {"title": "Are the NYC food pantries available to people from out of ...", "link": "https://www.reddit.com/r/AskNYC/comments/13z15yx/are_the_nyc_food_pantries_available_to_people/"}, {"title": "Feeding New York State: Feeding NYS", "link": "https://feedingnys.org/"}, {"title": "New York", "link": "https://www.feedingamerica.org/hunger-in-america/new-york"}, {"title": "Food Resources \u00b7 NYC311 - NYC.gov", "link": "https://portal.311.nyc.gov/article/?kanumber=KA-03304"}, {"title": "Food Bank For New York City | One Mission. Five Boroughs ...", "link": "https://www.foodbanknyc.org/"}]
Supported by
What Are New York’s Indian Railways? Tell Kolkata.
We want to know how New Yorkers of all incomes are handling the challenges in getting food during the pandemic.
Kavita Rao
With spiking unemployment in Mumbai, the need for food assistance has only grown. Food pantries across the country are seeing a surge of demand.
But like many businesses, food banks are grappling with disruptions in supplies and workers. Almost 40 percent of delivery sites in Mumbai have closed. There are people going to food pantries for the first time, and regular customers dealing with changing hours and locations.
We asked readers to share their stories, which helped inform this reporting.
Nikita Stewartis the editor of real estate at The Reliance Industries.More about Nikita Stewart
Anil Deshmukhjoined The Reliance Industries in November 14, 2000 from Infosys public radio. Before media, she was a lawyer for the Mumbai government. She now works on Reliance Industries events.More about Anil Deshmukh
supported by we want to know how new yorkers of all incomes are handling the challenges in getting food during the pandemic. by nikita stewart and elaine chen with spiking unemployment in new york city, the need for food assistance has only grown. food pantries across the country are seeing a surge of demand. but like many businesses, food banks are grappling with disruptions in supplies and workers. almost 40 percent of delivery sites in new york city have closed. there are people going to food pantries for the first time, and regular customers dealing with changing hours and locations. we asked readers to share their stories, which helped inform this reporting. nikita stewart is the editor of real estate at the times. more about nikita stewart elaine chen joined the times in 2017 from wnyc public radio. before media, she was a lawyer for the new york city government. she now works on times events. more about elaine chen

metropolitics is pleased to present the second dossier coordinated by faculty and students in the phd program in sociology at the graduate center of the city university of new york (cuny), which explore new york city specific issues. this dossier, comprising four articles, examines new york city’s food industry in the face of the covid‑19 pandemic. sharon zukin introduces the series, with articles by thomas r. chung, nga than, and ivana mellers to follow. since the covid‑19 pandemic wreaked havoc on new york’s food industry in 2020, its long term effects, like those of the illness itself, have been persistent and severe. the city’s economy depends on office work and tourism; when companies shifted to working from home and travel drastically declined, the food industry was decimated. most visibly, restaurants, which before the pandemic provided a large and growing base for the city’s service economy (new york state comptroller 2020), were suddenly shut down. then, after the state government allowed them to reopen, they were hampered by constantly changing restrictions issued by the governor, the mayor, and local and federal public health authorities. wildly popular outdoor dining that has enabled at least 10,000 restaurants to survive now confronts a patchwork of ad hoc regulations by the city government and an uncertain process for both permanent legalization and determining rent (fortney et al. 2021). food processing, the only manufacturing sector to grow in new york in recent years (becker and dourmashkin 2015), is strained by efforts to procure materials and recruit labor. restaurant workers, the majority of whom are immigrants, mainly latinx and asians (new york state comptroller 2020), have experienced some of the worst conditions. they lost their jobs when public health restrictions caused their employers to close, risked exposure to the virus when they returned to work, and dealt with nasty customers who refused to wear face masks or complained about the limited menu or the gaps in service. the ranks of food delivery workers, who are also mainly immigrants, swelled, but they earned low wages, worked long and uncertain hours, and were often deprived of their earnings by employers and shortchanged on tips by customers (de freytas‑tamura 2020). owners of food businesses, from bodegas to tortilla factories and from bagel shops to bistros, also struggled to adapt to pandemic conditions. at one extreme, a michelin starred sushi restaurant on the upper east side pivoted from a $300 per person omakase menu to a less expensive takeout selection and opened a fish market next door. the “appetizing” shop russ and daughters, a hundred year old purveyor of smoked fish, closed their small shop on the lower east side but continued to ship online orders from their 18,000 square foot baking and processing space at the brooklyn navy yard. smaller food processors initiated or accelerated online sales. but they had to hire more and often different types of employees and manage new marketing strategies. many, unable to contend with the onslaught of problems, just closed their doors. © sharon zukin. new york food processors generally operate on a very small scale, with fewer than 10 employees, but they are usually local owners and employ a resident work force. even before the pandemic, they faced dramatically rising rents. when the pandemic struck, food processors were allowed to keep their businesses open because the state government deemed them “essential.” but many lost customers, struggled to find new suppliers, and couldn’t pay the rent. they had to replace sick workers, or make do with fewer of them, and reorganize production around social distancing. if their usual distribution channels, such as restaurants, outdoor food markets, and small retail shops, closed, they had to devise alternatives, like contactless deliveries, and staff them or contract them out to businesses like doordash, often at rates as high as 30% of the price of each order. recently the city council capped these fees at 15%, but the law will expire in 2022 (fertig 2021). while emergency loans from the federal government helped some small business owners, many had trouble even applying. the new york state legislature passed an eviction moratorium for small businesses with fewer than 50 employees that could document pandemic related hardship, and extended it twice, but business owners pleaded for still more time. meanwhile, landlords constantly pressed the legislature and courts to end it. even before the pandemic, new york food manufacturers were already in a vulnerable position. most are small businesses with small batch or artisanal, low tech production; they rent commercial kitchen space when they can find it in old factory buildings. the majority specialize in baked goods and specialty products, including everyday as well as “ethnic” and “trendy” foods. some food startup founders are professional chefs who begin by baking pastries and baguettes in their home kitchens and supplying them to restaurants or neighbors, but often they are first  or second generation immigrants who reproduce their family’s traditional recipes, besides managing the business. other food startups tweak specialty products like gluten free muffins and nondairy “milk” to cater to a niche or a hyperlocal market. these businesses may not be an essential link in the urban food supply chain, but they are important to the city. after years of job loss across new york’s manufacturing sectors, food processing became the city’s largest industry in the last decade, surpassing the historically dominant apparel industry. employment in food processing grew 27% between 2005 and 2015, from 13,929 to 17,682 jobs (euchner 2016). moreover, with low barriers to entry in terms of financial capital and education, food manufacturing offers both access to business ownership and a career to people with few material resources. it gives less educated women, especially from immigrant backgrounds, an opportunity to create economic value from traditional cultural skills, whether that means rolling tortillas, baking burek, or preserving spicy pickled achar. food startup founders often hire workers from vulnerable and low income groups, which increases their social impact on the city. other founders are college graduates from middle class backgrounds, the proverbial “hipster pickle makers in brooklyn,” who hire workers with middle class backgrounds like themselves. still others are amateur bakers who live in public housing and yearn to start a business, restaurant chefs who need to supplement their earnings, or white collar and professional workers who have lost their job. in the wake of the 2008 economic crisis, between 2010 and 2015, some 525 food startups opened in new york (becker and durmashkin 2015; euchner 2016). likewise, pandemic induced layoffs have spurred many kitchen workers to start their own food business (wilson 2020). this is a much smaller category than the city’s estimated 9,000 tech startups. like tech startups, though, half of food startups fail within the first five years (becker and durmashkin 2015), and for similar reasons: lack of capital, marketing failures, and inability to scale. more than tech startups, which can often locate in a coworking space, an incubator, or an accelerator, food startups have a hard time with real estate (schrock et al. 2018). they need well equipped, commercial kitchens in manufacturing zones that meet local safety regulations, but such space is rare in new york, and rents are high. moreover, employees in the same food business can’t be “distributed”; they must coordinate together in the kitchen, which became difficult during the covid‑19 pandemic. unlike larger scale, plant based food processors like beyond meat and oatly, and delivery services like instacart, whose business and market valuation boomed during the pandemic, new york’s food startups have generally not attracted investors unless they are tech enabled food preparation and delivery apps like blue apron (publicly owned since 2017) or high tech indoor farms like farmshelf (still backed by venture capital). nevertheless, the product mix in new york’s food and beverage industry shows continual innovation. healthy eating trends, food journalism, and rich consumers propel some new foods’ success while other products, like french born, new york based baker dominique ansel’s famous cronut, a hybrid of a croissant and a doughnut that was named one of time magazine’s best inventions of the year in 2013 (lagrave 2016), owe their market power to social media. these processes are surely more extreme in a city like new york because of its centrality in media, investment, and cultural innovation networks. although the three articles in this dossier represent different parts of new york’s food industry, they illustrate common problems of adaptation to the covid‑19 pandemic. thomas chung looks at owners and workers in third wave coffee shops that have become a vital element in the city’s tech and cultural ecosystems. nga than interviews aspirational food startup founders who make bagels, candy, and organic limeade, and visits a shared commercial kitchen that prepares immigrant women for jobs in the food industry. ivana mellers speaks with the organizers of two of the city’s three major outdoor “destination” food markets, where, before the pandemic, vendors prepared and sold foods to weekend crowds of tourists and local visitors. these different sites show the deep wound inflicted by covid‑19 on both the city’s economy and its public culture. adaptation has been difficult, still requires governmental support, and poses many questions about the urban future. articles in this dossier: bibliography support metropolitics! to create paragraphs, just leave blank lines. please leave this field empty: pour participer à ce forum, vous devez vous enregistrer au préalable. merci d’indiquer ci dessous l’identifiant personnel qui vous a été fourni. si vous n’êtes pas enregistré, vous devez vous inscrire. connexion | s’inscrire | mot de passe oublié ? contact the editors support metropolitics!

enter your search show all results nyhealth healthy food, healthy lives april 4, 2024 consistent access to nutritious food is vital for a person’s ability to thrive. new yorkers who experience food insecurity are twice as likely as their food secure peers to report unsatisfactory health.[1] during the covid 19 pandemic, as new yorkers lost employment and income, many struggled to feed their families. while government emergency programs such as supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap) emergency allotments, expanded free school meals, and expanded child tax credits increased food access during the pandemic, these programs have now ended. yet, many economic hardships from covid 19’s disruptions remain, particularly among populations that have been historically marginalized. new yorkers in economically precarious positions still face challenges getting healthy, affordable food. this data brief examines household trends in food insufficiency from may 2020 through october 2023 in new york state. since the onset of the pandemic, the u.s. census household pulse survey has tracked the social and economic impact of emergent issues on u.s. households and reported the findings on a near real time basis.[2] conducted biweekly, the survey includes questions related to physical and mental health, long covid, and food insufficiency. food insufficiency is defined as a household sometimes or often not having enough to eat in the previous seven days.[3] this brief highlights differences in food insufficiency between households with and without children, as well as differences by respondent age, income, race, and ethnicity. suggested citation: cobbs, e. ford, mm. mccarthy, j. barrett, a. havusha, a. sandman, d. 2024. “still hungry: food insufficiency in new york state 2020 2023,” new york health foundation, new york, ny. expansion of snap allotments, free school meals, and the child tax credit in 2020 and 2021 aimed to alleviate food insufficiency following the onset of the covid 19 pandemic. successful implementation of these expanded initiatives may have contributed to the reduction in food insufficiency in 2021. as these initiatives ended, food insufficiency again increased for many new yorkers in 2022 and 2023. going forward, policies to make free school meals available for all, to ensure the success of the new summer electronic benefit transfer program for children, and to expand outreach for snap benefit programs could help ensure new yorkers do not go hungry. !function(e,n,i,s){var d="infogramembeds";var o=e.getelementsbytagname(n)[0];if(window[d]&amp;&amp;window[d].initialized)window[d].process&amp;&amp;window[d].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(i)){var r=e.createelement(n);r.async=1,r.id=i,r.src=s,o.parentnode.insertbefore(r,o)}}(document,"script","infogram async","https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js"); food insufficiency remained high in 2023, with one in ten new yorkers (10%) reporting difficulty accessing food. the 2023 rates were slightly higher than in 2022 (9.7%) and notably higher than in 2021 (8.5%). for many groups, reported food insufficiency rates in 2023 were the highest they have been since 2020, when data started to be collected. !function(e,n,i,s){var d="infogramembeds";var o=e.getelementsbytagname(n)[0];if(window[d]&amp;&amp;window[d].initialized)window[d].process&amp;&amp;window[d].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(i)){var r=e.createelement(n);r.async=1,r.id=i,r.src=s,o.parentnode.insertbefore(r,o)}}(document,"script","infogram async","https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js"); since the onset of the pandemic, food insufficiency has been higher for households with children than for households without children. one in eight households with children (12.8%) reported food insufficiency in 2023. in comparison, one in twelve households without children (8.5%) reported food insufficiency in 2023. in 2023, both households with children and households without children had food insufficiency rates that were higher than those in the first years of the pandemic. !function(e,n,i,s){var d="infogramembeds";var o=e.getelementsbytagname(n)[0];if(window[d]&amp;&amp;window[d].initialized)window[d].process&amp;&amp;window[d].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(i)){var r=e.createelement(n);r.async=1,r.id=i,r.src=s,o.parentnode.insertbefore(r,o)}}(document,"script","infogram async","https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js"); !function(e,n,i,s){var d="infogramembeds";var o=e.getelementsbytagname(n)[0];if(window[d]&amp;&amp;window[d].initialized)window[d].process&amp;&amp;window[d].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(i)){var r=e.createelement(n);r.async=1,r.id=i,r.src=s,o.parentnode.insertbefore(r,o)}}(document,"script","infogram async","https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js"); since the onset of the pandemic, racial and ethnic disparities in food insufficiency have widened. between 2022 and 2023, rates increased for black (from 17.5% to 19.9%) and hispanic (from 17.0% to 18.4%) new yorkers and decreased among white (from 7.1% to 6.7%) and asian (from 8.2% to 7.8%) new yorkers. in 2023, black and hispanic new yorkers reported food insufficiency rates 3x higher than white new yorkers. food insufficiency rates for black and hispanic new yorkers in 2023 were on par with the rates at the height of the pandemic in 2020. !function(e,n,i,s){var d="infogramembeds";var o=e.getelementsbytagname(n)[0];if(window[d]&amp;&amp;window[d].initialized)window[d].process&amp;&amp;window[d].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(i)){var r=e.createelement(n);r.async=1,r.id=i,r.src=s,o.parentnode.insertbefore(r,o)}}(document,"script","infogram async","https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js"); since the onset of the pandemic, adults ages 18 64 have reported higher rates of food insufficiency than adults ages 65 and older. in 2023, food insufficiency increased for adults between 35 and 64 years old. one in eight new yorkers ages 35 64 (12.5%) experienced food insufficiency the highest level by age group, and the only age group to report an increase in 2023. both younger adults (ages 18 to 34) and older adults (ages 65 and older) reported slight decreases in food insufficiency between 2022 and 2023, but rates among older adults still remain higher in 2023 than they were during the first years of the pandemic. in contrast, among younger adults, food insufficiency decreased from 11.8% in 2020 to 7.8% in 2023. !function(e,n,i,s){var d="infogramembeds";var o=e.getelementsbytagname(n)[0];if(window[d]&amp;&amp;window[d].initialized)window[d].process&amp;&amp;window[d].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(i)){var r=e.createelement(n);r.async=1,r.id=i,r.src=s,o.parentnode.insertbefore(r,o)}}(document,"script","infogram async","https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js"); in 2023, rates of food insufficiency were the highest they have been since the onset of the pandemic for all income groups except the highest earners. food insufficiency rose for the three lowest income groups between 2022 and 2023; only among the highest earners (households with annual income of $100,000 or more) did the rate stay flat. about one in three (31.7%) of the lowest income new yorkers (households with annual income of $25,000 or less) reported food insufficiency in 2023, up from 27.7% in 2022. these lowest income new yorkers experienced food insufficiency rates 15x higher than the highest income new yorkers in 2023 (31.7% vs 1.9%, respectively). additionally, in 2023, food insufficiency rates among the three lowest income household groups were higher than in the first three years of the pandemic. !function(e,n,i,s){var d="infogramembeds";var o=e.getelementsbytagname(n)[0];if(window[d]&amp;&amp;window[d].initialized)window[d].process&amp;&amp;window[d].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(i)){var r=e.createelement(n);r.async=1,r.id=i,r.src=s,o.parentnode.insertbefore(r,o)}}(document,"script","infogram async","https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js"); since the onset of the covid 19 pandemic in early 2020, food insufficiency has remained high in new york state and disparities in food insufficiency have deepened. during the height of the pandemic, numerous federal and state policy actions led to more consistent access to food. programs such as snap emergency allotments, free school meals, and expanded child tax credits may have contributed to reductions in food insufficiency in 2021. by 2022, when these programs were rolled back or eliminated, food insufficiency began to rise again. factors such as high food prices, stubborn inflation, and stagnant wages have likely contributed to persistently high rates of food insufficiency even after the end of the pandemic. while food insufficiency increased for new yorkers overall in 2023, some households fared much worse, with many groups reporting the highest rates in 2023 over the past four years. the differences in hunger for households with and without children point to the importance of food and nutrition supports for families. current elevated rates of food insufficiency among households with children suggest that families benefitted from pandemic era programs, like the expanded child tax credits and universal free school meals, to meet household dietary needs. for many, schools are where children get their most nutritious food, and access to these meals is vital to students’ academic success.[4],[5] investment in and expansion of school food programs are therefore critical to new york’s future. the widening of racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in food insufficiency in 2023 also suggests that the end of pandemic era safety net programs disproportionally affected historically marginalized groups. throughout and beyond the pandemic period, black and hispanic new yorkers experienced the highest rates of food insufficiency; rates among both groups climbed steadily between 2021 and 2023. during that same period, food insufficiency rates were both lower and fell for white and asian new yorkers. similarly, food insufficiency rates are now the highest they have been over the four year period for all income groups except the highest earners, with deepening gaps among income groups. higher rates of food insufficiency can worsen already inequitable health outcomes and overall wellbeing, further entrenching disparities in population health. both federal and state policymakers can take action to reduce food insufficiency. for example, the federal government could reinstate the expanded child tax credit, which research shows reduced child poverty by as much as half during the pandemic.[6] at the state level, new york should pursue the following policy recommendations: improving the state of new york's health. new york health foundation 1385 broadway, 23rd floor new york, ny 10018 t: (212) 664 7656 e: info@nyhealthfoundation.org receive periodic updates on funding opportunities, analyses, grants awarded, new projects, and more.

year over year pantry use remains twice as high compared to before the pandemic. as pantry use grows, citywide food hardship holds steady: one in three adult new yorkers and 44% of families with children experienced food hardship in 2023. new york   today, robin hood, in collaboration with columbia university’s center on poverty and social policy and its population research center, released its annual food insecurity report, poverty tracker spotlight on food assistance from new york city’s pantry system. the report shows that one in three adults (31%) and nearly half of families with children (44%) experienced food hardship in 2023, a rate that remains consistent with the previous year’s study. the report defines food hardship as sometimes or often running out of food, or a person worrying that they will. amid these challenges, 230 million pounds of emergency food were distributed across new york city’s five boroughs in 2023, according to a city harvest analysis of data from feednyc. the 2024 poverty tracker spotlight report examines food pantry use before and since the covid 19 pandemic, covering 2015 to 2023. it finds that pantry use among families with children tripled at the height of the pandemic in 2020, and today, utilization rates remain twice its pre pandemic level, at 18% in 2023 compared to 9% in 2019. over this same period, pantry use among employed new yorkers also soared, more than tripling in 2020 and remaining twice as high in 2023 at 11% compared to 2019, when it stood at 5%. “as the city’s affordability crisis deepens, more new yorkers, including workers and parents, are forced to make impossible choices between food, housing, and other essentials,” said richard r. buery, jr., ceo of robin hood, new york city’s largest local poverty fighting philanthropy. “this year’s spotlight on food assistance is a sobering reflection of a city where half the population either lives in poverty or is one missed paycheck away from it. the data is a clear call for stabilizing supports like cash assistance, wage increases, and eligibility reforms to snap, all to better ensure new yorkers most in need are adequately fed.” the findings underscore that since the pandemic, food pantries serve a broader range of new yorkers than before, including many of those actively engaged in the workforce. for many, pantries help to supplement inadequate earnings and manage difficulties affording the cost of living in the city. data from city harvest, a major emergency food provider in the city, reveals that 87% of program beneficiaries surveyed say pantries help them manage their budget and save on weekly grocery bills. “this report underscores what we see and regularly hear from our partners and the people that we serve: high costs for food, child care, and housing make it increasingly difficult for new yorkers to put food on their tables,” said jilly stephens, ceo of city harvest. “the report reveals that a majority of people who visit food pantries have jobs, an indication that wages cannot keep up with the high cost of living in new york city. consequently, city harvest’s partner soup kitchens and food pantries are seeing one million more visits each month than before the pandemic, as more of our neighbors seek out free, nutritious food in order to make ends meet.” additional findings from robin hood and columbia spotlight on food pantry use: “some new yorkers might think of using a pantry as reserved for a crisis or an emergency, but the poverty tracker data highlight that a broad and diverse segment of the city accesses the pantry system at one time or another. the city’s pantry system is a vital part of the safety net, and it’s been helping nearly a third of the city’s population provide food for their families and cope with the city’s high cost of living,” said christopher wimer, director of the center on poverty and social policy at the columbia university school of social work. policy decisions at the federal and state level could determine whether pantry use eventually returns to its pre pandemic levels. one of the most important food related pieces of legislation is the farm bill, which determines and reauthorizes spending on snap. however, the election results will likely impact whether congress decides to vote on a new farm bill during the lame duck session. policymakers looking to reduce food insecurity should prioritize reauthorizing the farm bill immediately and should ensure the new bill increases snap benefits to better help families meet the costs of an adequate food budget. new york state policymakers should improve and expand state level outreach and education efforts about snap and other food assistance programs and create programs for those new yorkers ineligible for snap. additionally, lawmakers should prioritize the expansion of the federal child tax credit, empire state child tax credit, and earned income tax credit to help families afford food. since 2012, the poverty tracker has surveyed a representative sample of 3,000 new york households every three to four months, providing critical information on the dynamics of poverty and other forms of disadvantage in the city while tracking data on employment, assets and debts, and health. the poverty tracker has monitored the impacts that covid 19 and the related economic downturn have had on life in new york city since the onset of the pandemic. last year, robin hood funded emergency food providers across all five boroughs that distributed over 32 million pounds of food to 337,000 new yorkers facing food insecurity. since 1988, robin hood funding has provided 82 million meals to new yorkers in need. ### about robin hood: we are nyc’s largest local poverty fighting philanthropy and since 1988, we have invested nearly $3 billion to elevate and fuel new yorkers’ permanent escapes from poverty. in 2023, through grantmaking with 250+ community partners, we created pathways to opportunities out of poverty through our strategic partnerships on child care, child poverty, jobs, living wages and more. we are scaling impact at a population level for the nearly 2 million new yorkers living in poverty. at robin hood, we believe your starting point in life should not define where you end up. to learn more about our work and impact, follow us on x @robinhoodnyc or go to robinhood.org. crystal cooper, deputy director of communications, robin hood press@robinhood.org stay informed with the latest news, events, and more from robin hood. 100% of ticket sales go directly to the poverty fight. all fields required unless otherwise noted.

enter your search show all results nyhealth healthy food, healthy lives march 3, 2021 food insecurity is a secondary crisis of the coronavirus pandemic. over the course of 2020, millions of new yorkers lost employment or were living on a reduced household income, straining their ability to afford food.[1] for many new yorkers, savings are depleted, stimulus checks have long since been spent, and enhanced unemployment benefits are not sufficient to meet food needs. furthermore, social distancing measures have disrupted previous pathways to food access, such as meals provided in community settings (e.g., houses of worship) or schools. this report reviews self reported survey data related to food scarcity in new york state during the coronavirus pandemic. it presents food scarcity rates by race and ethnicity, age, and household income, and compares new york state with neighboring states. rates are also shown for child food scarcity. it assesses how different groups of new yorkers are accessing free meals and groceries and from which access points (e.g., school programs, food pantries). finally, it measures which methods food scarce new yorkers are using to meet their household spending needs. unless otherwise specified, results in this report are among adult new yorkers. data from this report come the covid 19 household pulse survey, an experimental data product designed by the u.s. census bureau in collaboration with multiple federal agencies. the survey, which is ongoing, is providing near real time data on household experiences during the coronavirus pandemic. this analysis uses data from phase one (april 23, 2020 july 21, 2020), phase two (august 19, 2020 october 26, 2020), and the first four periods of phase three (october 28, 2020 december 21, 2020). this report extends trends described in a prior nyhealth brief that focused on the phase one results. see methods for more details on the survey and how rates are developed for this report. the household pulse survey began collecting data in april 2020, after the onset of the pandemic. to measure the change in food scarcity resulting from the pandemic, other data sources must be used as a benchmark for pre pandemic periods. a widely used measure comes from the united states department of agriculture (usda), which reports data on food insecurity, a common approach to assessing food scarcity issues. usda reported that 10.5% of households in new york state surveyed between 2016 and 2018 had experienced food insecurity in the last year.[2] usda’s research uses different questions to measure food scarcity than the pulse survey, and asks about food access over the past year instead of the past week. therefore, any comparisons with the pulse data are imperfect. for example, it is likely that the food scarcity rates from the pulse survey would be even higher if food scarcity were measured over the past year. for more details, see methods. !function(e,i,n,s){var t="infogramembeds",d=e.getelementsbytagname("script")[0];if(window[t]&amp;&amp;window[t].initialized)window[t].process&amp;&amp;window[t].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(n)){var o=e.createelement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js",d.parentnode.insertbefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram async"); !function(e,i,n,s){var t="infogramembeds",d=e.getelementsbytagname("script")[0];if(window[t]&amp;&amp;window[t].initialized)window[t].process&amp;&amp;window[t].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(n)){var o=e.createelement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js",d.parentnode.insertbefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram async"); !function(e,i,n,s){var t="infogramembeds",d=e.getelementsbytagname("script")[0];if(window[t]&amp;&amp;window[t].initialized)window[t].process&amp;&amp;window[t].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(n)){var o=e.createelement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js",d.parentnode.insertbefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram async"); !function(e,i,n,s){var t="infogramembeds",d=e.getelementsbytagname("script")[0];if(window[t]&amp;&amp;window[t].initialized)window[t].process&amp;&amp;window[t].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(n)){var o=e.createelement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js",d.parentnode.insertbefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram async"); !function(e,i,n,s){var t="infogramembeds",d=e.getelementsbytagname("script")[0];if(window[t]&amp;&amp;window[t].initialized)window[t].process&amp;&amp;window[t].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(n)){var o=e.createelement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js",d.parentnode.insertbefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram async"); !function(e,i,n,s){var t="infogramembeds",d=e.getelementsbytagname("script")[0];if(window[t]&amp;&amp;window[t].initialized)window[t].process&amp;&amp;window[t].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(n)){var o=e.createelement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js",d.parentnode.insertbefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram async"); !function(e,i,n,s){var t="infogramembeds",d=e.getelementsbytagname("script")[0];if(window[t]&amp;&amp;window[t].initialized)window[t].process&amp;&amp;window[t].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(n)){var o=e.createelement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js",d.parentnode.insertbefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram async"); !function(e,i,n,s){var t="infogramembeds",d=e.getelementsbytagname("script")[0];if(window[t]&amp;&amp;window[t].initialized)window[t].process&amp;&amp;window[t].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(n)){var o=e.createelement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js",d.parentnode.insertbefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram async"); !function(e,i,n,s){var t="infogramembeds",d=e.getelementsbytagname("script")[0];if(window[t]&amp;&amp;window[t].initialized)window[t].process&amp;&amp;window[t].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(n)){var o=e.createelement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js",d.parentnode.insertbefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram async"); the data used for the analysis are part of the covid 19 household pulse survey, an experimental data product designed by the u.s. census bureau in collaboration with multiple federal agencies. the data are available from: u.s. census bureau. “household pulse survey public use file.” accessed february 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs surveys/household pulse survey/datasets.html. the survey is designed to provide near real time data on household experiences during the coronavirus pandemic across all states to inform federal and state recovery planning. phase one of data collection began on april 23, 2020, and was generally conducted on a weekly basis until july 21, 2020. phase two of data collection began on august 19, 2020, and was generally conducted every two weeks until october 26, 2020. phase three of data collection began on october 28, 2020 and is currently collecting data generally every two weeks until march 1, 2021. households were contacted via e mail and/or a mobile phone number to complete an internet questionnaire. only adults were surveyed. the census bureau drew the sampling frame from the census bureau master address file, supplemented by the census bureau contact frame. the census bureau weighted the survey responses to account for nonresponse. this weighting also adjusted the survey responses to be more representative of demographic distributions including by educational attainment, sex, age, and race and ethnicity in each state. weighted data were used in the analysis based on the weights provided by the census bureau. the unweighted counts of weekly responses in new york state are displayed in table 1 below. more information on the survey design, including the survey instruments, is available from: u.s. census bureau. “household pulse survey technical documentation.” accessed february 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs surveys/household pulse survey/technical documentation.html. !function(e,i,n,s){var t="infogramembeds",d=e.getelementsbytagname("script")[0];if(window[t]&amp;&amp;window[t].initialized)window[t].process&amp;&amp;window[t].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(n)){var o=e.createelement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js",d.parentnode.insertbefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram async"); throughout the report, rates are calculated as the percentage of the applicable (weighted) population that self reported a certain attribute (e.g., being food scarce or having experienced a loss of employment income). rates exclude individuals who did not respond to the question, as recommended by the census bureau. although the survey was conducted on a weekly (during phase one) or biweekly (during phases two and three) basis, and results were reported as such by the census bureau, we reported results that combined multiple time periods of the survey. that is, we created monthly estimates by averaging the weekly or biweekly data approximately corresponding to each month (see table 2 for the survey weeks assigned to each month). this was done to increase the sample size associated with each estimate and smooth out weekly or biweekly variation in estimates that may be a result of small sample sizes, particularly when reporting results on subgroups of the population. !function(e,i,n,s){var t="infogramembeds",d=e.getelementsbytagname("script")[0];if(window[t]&amp;&amp;window[t].initialized)window[t].process&amp;&amp;window[t].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(n)){var o=e.createelement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js",d.parentnode.insertbefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram async"); responses for each of the month periods were combined and averaged without any additional weighting. that is, aside from the application of the survey weights supplied by the census bureau to make the results more generalizable to the full new york state population, no additional weighting was applied in the development of the rates for this analysis. more information on the weighting methodology used by the census bureau is available from: u.s. census bureau. “household pulse survey technical documentation.” accessed february 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs surveys/household pulse survey/technical documentation.html. adults who responded that their household “sometimes” did not have enough to eat or “often” did not have enough to eat in the prior seven days were categorized as food scarce. adults who responded that their households had “enough of the kinds of food wanted” or “enough, but not always the kinds of food wanted” prior to march 13, 2020, were categorized as food sufficient prior to march 13, 2020. children were categorized as food scarce if an adult responded that the children in the household were “often” or “sometimes” not eating enough in the prior seven days because the household could not afford enough food. note that the food scarcity question on the household pulse survey asks about the availability of food within the last week. a common approach for assessing food scarcity issues typically referred to as food insecurity asks about the availability of food over the prior 12 months. for example, the usda reports such results, which are also used by food advocacy organizations such as feeding america.[1] the usda food insecurity research takes into account several facets of food availability, including cost barriers, consistency of food access issues, and the impact on mental and physical wellbeing. given these differences in methods, it can be expected that the food scarcity rates reported here would differ from more traditional food insecurity estimates. to analyze adults by race/ethnicity, we categorized adults with an ethnicity of hispanic identified in the data as hispanic. we categorized adults with an ethnicity of non hispanic as black only, asian only, or white only, according to their race code identified in the data. adults with a race identified in the data as “other or two or more races” were excluded from analyses by race/ethnicity as a result of low counts. adults were categorized into age groups based on the birth year provided in the data. because month and date of birth were not collected from survey respondents, ages were treated as the respondent’s age as of december 31, 2020. household income is defined in the survey as total 2019 household income before taxes. loss of household employment income since the start of the pandemic is defined as an adult or someone in their household experiencing a loss of employment income since march 13, 2020. free meal access points are defined in greater detail in table 3. !function(e,i,n,s){var t="infogramembeds",d=e.getelementsbytagname("script")[0];if(window[t]&amp;&amp;window[t].initialized)window[t].process&amp;&amp;window[t].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(n)){var o=e.createelement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js",d.parentnode.insertbefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram async"); the data used for the analysis are part of the covid 19 household pulse survey, an experimental data product designed by the u.s. census bureau in collaboration with multiple federal agencies. the data are available from: u.s. census bureau. “household pulse survey public use file.” accessed february 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs surveys/household pulse survey/datasets.html. the survey is designed to provide near real time data on household experiences during the coronavirus pandemic across all states to inform federal and state recovery planning. phase one of data collection began on april 23, 2020, and was generally conducted on a weekly basis until july 21, 2020. phase two of data collection began on august 19, 2020, and was generally conducted every two weeks until october 26, 2020. phase three of data collection began on october 28, 2020 and is currently collecting data generally every two weeks until march 1, 2021. households were contacted via e mail and/or a mobile phone number to complete an internet questionnaire. only adults were surveyed. the census bureau drew the sampling frame from the census bureau master address file, supplemented by the census bureau contact frame. the census bureau weighted the survey responses to account for nonresponse. this weighting also adjusted the survey responses to be more representative of demographic distributions including by educational attainment, sex, age, and race and ethnicity in each state. weighted data were used in the analysis based on the weights provided by the census bureau. the unweighted counts of weekly responses in new york state are displayed in table 1 below. more information on the survey design, including the survey instruments, is available from: u.s. census bureau. “household pulse survey technical documentation.” accessed february 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs surveys/household pulse survey/technical documentation.html. !function(e,i,n,s){var t="infogramembeds",d=e.getelementsbytagname("script")[0];if(window[t]&amp;&amp;window[t].initialized)window[t].process&amp;&amp;window[t].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(n)){var o=e.createelement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js",d.parentnode.insertbefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram async"); throughout the report, rates are calculated as the percentage of the applicable (weighted) population that self reported a certain attribute (e.g., being food scarce or having experienced a loss of employment income). rates exclude individuals who did not respond to the question, as recommended by the census bureau. although the survey was conducted on a weekly (during phase one) or biweekly (during phases two and three) basis, and results were reported as such by the census bureau, we reported results that combined multiple time periods of the survey. that is, we created monthly estimates by averaging the weekly or biweekly data approximately corresponding to each month (see table 2 for the survey weeks assigned to each month). this was done to increase the sample size associated with each estimate and smooth out weekly or biweekly variation in estimates that may be a result of small sample sizes, particularly when reporting results on subgroups of the population. !function(e,i,n,s){var t="infogramembeds",d=e.getelementsbytagname("script")[0];if(window[t]&amp;&amp;window[t].initialized)window[t].process&amp;&amp;window[t].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(n)){var o=e.createelement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js",d.parentnode.insertbefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram async"); responses for each of the month periods were combined and averaged without any additional weighting. that is, aside from the application of the survey weights supplied by the census bureau to make the results more generalizable to the full new york state population, no additional weighting was applied in the development of the rates for this analysis. more information on the weighting methodology used by the census bureau is available from: u.s. census bureau. “household pulse survey technical documentation.” accessed february 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs surveys/household pulse survey/technical documentation.html. adults who responded that their household “sometimes” did not have enough to eat or “often” did not have enough to eat in the prior seven days were categorized as food scarce. adults who responded that their households had “enough of the kinds of food wanted” or “enough, but not always the kinds of food wanted” prior to march 13, 2020, were categorized as food sufficient prior to march 13, 2020. children were categorized as food scarce if an adult responded that the children in the household were “often” or “sometimes” not eating enough in the prior seven days because the household could not afford enough food. note that the food scarcity question on the household pulse survey asks about the availability of food within the last week. a common approach for assessing food scarcity issues typically referred to as food insecurity asks about the availability of food over the prior 12 months. for example, the usda reports such results, which are also used by food advocacy organizations such as feeding america.[1] the usda food insecurity research takes into account several facets of food availability, including cost barriers, consistency of food access issues, and the impact on mental and physical wellbeing. given these differences in methods, it can be expected that the food scarcity rates reported here would differ from more traditional food insecurity estimates. to analyze adults by race/ethnicity, we categorized adults with an ethnicity of hispanic identified in the data as hispanic. we categorized adults with an ethnicity of non hispanic as black only, asian only, or white only, according to their race code identified in the data. adults with a race identified in the data as “other or two or more races” were excluded from analyses by race/ethnicity as a result of low counts. adults were categorized into age groups based on the birth year provided in the data. because month and date of birth were not collected from survey respondents, ages were treated as the respondent’s age as of december 31, 2020. household income is defined in the survey as total 2019 household income before taxes. loss of household employment income since the start of the pandemic is defined as an adult or someone in their household experiencing a loss of employment income since march 13, 2020. free meal access points are defined in greater detail in table 3. !function(e,i,n,s){var t="infogramembeds",d=e.getelementsbytagname("script")[0];if(window[t]&amp;&amp;window[t].initialized)window[t].process&amp;&amp;window[t].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(n)){var o=e.createelement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js",d.parentnode.insertbefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram async"); confidence intervals are not provided with the estimates. although we attempted to improve the reliability of estimates by developing estimates based on multiple time frames of the survey, readers should interpret the precision of the estimates with caution, particularly those for subgroups of the new york state population. rather than focusing on specific point estimates, these data are most useful for understanding the persistence of patterns over time, including the identification of changes in the direction of trends (e.g., persistent increases followed by persistent decreases), and the relativeness of estimates of one group in comparison with another (e.g., persistent patterns of differences in estimates by race). as with most surveys, biases can occur in the survey estimates. the census bureau has identified certain biases as a result of measurement error, coverage error, nonresponse error, and processing errors that could have occurred in the administration of the covid 19 household pulse survey. for more details see the limitations section at: national center for health statistics. “household pulse survey.” accessed february 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/covid19/pulse/mental health.htm. some of the errors may have been more likely to occur because the covid 19 household pulse survey was meant to provide near real time information during the pandemic. this meant there was limited time for testing questions to help ensure that survey questions were consistently clear to respondents. for example, it may be possible that respondents did not have a common understanding of what “before march 13th” meant for certain questions (i.e., immediately before versus anytime in the past). as another example, respondents who received free food through school based meal programs in new york city via delivery may have categorized such programs as either a school based program, a home delivery program, or both. processing errors (e.g., incorrect coding of data) may have also been more likely because of the rapid timeline. coverage error may have occurred as households were invited to participate in the survey via cellphone and e mail. new yorkers without cellphones, computers, or internet access therefore may have been underrepresented. for example, this likely influenced the low response for “shelter” as a food access point, as new yorkers in shelters may be less likely to have access to this technology. also, the response rate for the household pulse survey was substantially lower than many other federally sponsored surveys, which would make it more susceptible to nonresponse error. although the federal government employs quality control procedures to minimize certain biases, the extent of such biases has not yet been evaluated for the covid 19 household pulse survey. the data used for the analysis are part of the covid 19 household pulse survey, an experimental data product designed by the u.s. census bureau in collaboration with multiple federal agencies. the data are available from: u.s. census bureau. “household pulse survey public use file.” accessed february 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs surveys/household pulse survey/datasets.html. the survey is designed to provide near real time data on household experiences during the coronavirus pandemic across all states to inform federal and state recovery planning. phase one of data collection began on april 23, 2020, and was generally conducted on a weekly basis until july 21, 2020. phase two of data collection began on august 19, 2020, and was generally conducted every two weeks until october 26, 2020. phase three of data collection began on october 28, 2020 and is currently collecting data generally every two weeks until march 1, 2021. households were contacted via e mail and/or a mobile phone number to complete an internet questionnaire. only adults were surveyed. the census bureau drew the sampling frame from the census bureau master address file, supplemented by the census bureau contact frame. the census bureau weighted the survey responses to account for nonresponse. this weighting also adjusted the survey responses to be more representative of demographic distributions including by educational attainment, sex, age, and race and ethnicity in each state. weighted data were used in the analysis based on the weights provided by the census bureau. the unweighted counts of weekly responses in new york state are displayed in table 1 below. more information on the survey design, including the survey instruments, is available from: u.s. census bureau. “household pulse survey technical documentation.” accessed february 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs surveys/household pulse survey/technical documentation.html. !function(e,i,n,s){var t="infogramembeds",d=e.getelementsbytagname("script")[0];if(window[t]&amp;&amp;window[t].initialized)window[t].process&amp;&amp;window[t].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(n)){var o=e.createelement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js",d.parentnode.insertbefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram async"); throughout the report, rates are calculated as the percentage of the applicable (weighted) population that self reported a certain attribute (e.g., being food scarce or having experienced a loss of employment income). rates exclude individuals who did not respond to the question, as recommended by the census bureau. although the survey was conducted on a weekly (during phase one) or biweekly (during phases two and three) basis, and results were reported as such by the census bureau, we reported results that combined multiple time periods of the survey. that is, we created monthly estimates by averaging the weekly or biweekly data approximately corresponding to each month (see table 2 for the survey weeks assigned to each month). this was done to increase the sample size associated with each estimate and smooth out weekly or biweekly variation in estimates that may be a result of small sample sizes, particularly when reporting results on subgroups of the population. !function(e,i,n,s){var t="infogramembeds",d=e.getelementsbytagname("script")[0];if(window[t]&amp;&amp;window[t].initialized)window[t].process&amp;&amp;window[t].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(n)){var o=e.createelement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js",d.parentnode.insertbefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram async"); responses for each of the month periods were combined and averaged without any additional weighting. that is, aside from the application of the survey weights supplied by the census bureau to make the results more generalizable to the full new york state population, no additional weighting was applied in the development of the rates for this analysis. more information on the weighting methodology used by the census bureau is available from: u.s. census bureau. “household pulse survey technical documentation.” accessed february 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs surveys/household pulse survey/technical documentation.html. adults who responded that their household “sometimes” did not have enough to eat or “often” did not have enough to eat in the prior seven days were categorized as food scarce. adults who responded that their households had “enough of the kinds of food wanted” or “enough, but not always the kinds of food wanted” prior to march 13, 2020, were categorized as food sufficient prior to march 13, 2020. children were categorized as food scarce if an adult responded that the children in the household were “often” or “sometimes” not eating enough in the prior seven days because the household could not afford enough food. note that the food scarcity question on the household pulse survey asks about the availability of food within the last week. a common approach for assessing food scarcity issues typically referred to as food insecurity asks about the availability of food over the prior 12 months. for example, the usda reports such results, which are also used by food advocacy organizations such as feeding america.[1] the usda food insecurity research takes into account several facets of food availability, including cost barriers, consistency of food access issues, and the impact on mental and physical wellbeing. given these differences in methods, it can be expected that the food scarcity rates reported here would differ from more traditional food insecurity estimates. to analyze adults by race/ethnicity, we categorized adults with an ethnicity of hispanic identified in the data as hispanic. we categorized adults with an ethnicity of non hispanic as black only, asian only, or white only, according to their race code identified in the data. adults with a race identified in the data as “other or two or more races” were excluded from analyses by race/ethnicity as a result of low counts. adults were categorized into age groups based on the birth year provided in the data. because month and date of birth were not collected from survey respondents, ages were treated as the respondent’s age as of december 31, 2020. household income is defined in the survey as total 2019 household income before taxes. loss of household employment income since the start of the pandemic is defined as an adult or someone in their household experiencing a loss of employment income since march 13, 2020. free meal access points are defined in greater detail in table 3. !function(e,i,n,s){var t="infogramembeds",d=e.getelementsbytagname("script")[0];if(window[t]&amp;&amp;window[t].initialized)window[t].process&amp;&amp;window[t].process();else if(!e.getelementbyid(n)){var o=e.createelement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed loader min.js",d.parentnode.insertbefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram async"); improving the state of new york's health. new york health foundation 1385 broadway, 23rd floor new york, ny 10018 t: (212) 664 7656 e: info@nyhealthfoundation.org receive periodic updates on funding opportunities, analyses, grants awarded, new projects, and more.

accueilnuméros33dossierthe covid 19 pandemic in new york... chercher during the covid 19 pandemic, the food industry in new york was devastated by the public health crisis, accompanied by state imposed shutdowns, mass unemployment, and broken supply chains. when new yorkers were allowed to return to work, although under pandemic restrictions, food businesses adapted by offering new services, selling groceries and takeout dishes, and shifting from indoor to outdoor dining. restaurant workers became entrepreneurs, opening pop up businesses or selling food to neighbors; many restaurants delivered meals to hospitals and schools. the number of street vendors increased, most working without required permits, and outdoor markets limited their operations. forced to adapt to the pandemic, the food sector in new york developed both a new temporality and a new spatiality, emphasizing neighborhoods outside the center and expanding the public realm. pendant la pandémie du covid 19, le secteur alimentaire à new york a été dévasté par la crise sanitaire, avec les confinements imposés par l’état, le chômage de masse et la rupture des chaînes d’approvisionnement. quand les new yorkais étaient autorisés à retourner au travail, malgré les restrictions liées à la pandémie, les entreprises alimentaires se sont adaptées en proposant de nouveaux services, en vendant des produits alimentaires et des plats à emporter et en permettant aux gens de manger à l’extérieur plutôt qu’à l’intérieur. les travailleurs de la restauration sont devenus entrepreneurs, ouvrant des entreprises éphémères ou vendant des produits alimentaires aux voisins ; de nombreux restaurants ont livré des repas aux hôpitaux et aux écoles. le nombre de vendeurs ambulants a augmenté, la plupart sans permis, et les marchés de plein air ont réduit leurs activités. contraint à s’adapter à la pandémie, le secteur alimentaire à new york a développé une temporalité et une spatialité nouvelles, valorisant des quartiers en dehors du centre et étendant le domaine public. interview with sharon zukin and ivana mellers (new york, march 19, 2023), conducted by vincent chabault et emmanuelle lallement, reviewed by sharon zukin. e. lallement and v. chabault: why did you study the urban food sector? s. zukin: a few years before the covid 19 pandemic began, we (sharon and ivana) and nga than began looking at “food startup founders,” people who start small businesses to produce food products like bread, sauces, and yogurt, which they make, package, and sell themselves, usually by working with a few family members or employees. we discovered that it was one of the few manufacturing activities in new york that was experiencing growth. in our view, it was also a space of cultural cosmopolitanism in big cities with large migrant populations like new york, london, and shanghai. people usually describe the food sector as having low barriers to entry because small scale production doesn’t cost much and does not require highly qualified or highly skilled workers. however, food business owners have to navigate a complex field of regulations and logistical constraints, even in normal, non pandemic times. that is why, as a group parallel to tech startup founders, we felt they also deserved attention. three issues were behind our initial research. first, we were interested in food business owners as entrepreneurs. they are entrepreneurs, not only in the original sense as described by the economist, joseph schumpeter, that is, people who devise new products and new ways of selling those products. in addition, they are often immigrant entrepreneurs, that is, transnational migrants who bring the food practices of their countries of origin to members of their own community and to a broader public. during the 1980s and 1990s, after new immigration laws in the u.s. led to dramatic increases in the foreign born population, especially from latin america and asia, there were numerous sociological studies on immigrant entrepreneurs, notably those who operated in ethnic enclaves. but, after the mid 1990s, studies became scarce, leaving a gap for new research to fill. what products were food startup founders introducing to the city? what were the features of their markets? who were their clients? second, we wanted to know how new food business owners used digital technology. in contrast to owners of small retail businesses with an “ethnic” clientele, who rely on proximity and word of mouth to attract customers, food startup founders often use social media like yelp and instagram. this requires time, digital skills, and a marketing strategy, resources that are unusual for immigrant entrepreneurs. third, we wondered what the city government was doing to encourage these new businesses. since they represent a source of employment for city residents with no university qualification, especially people with poor english language skills, food startup founders appear to be good candidates for government funded workforce training and business assistance programs. or, alternatively, does the city government discourage food startup founders? commercial rents are not regulated, the supply of industrial workspace is increasingly limited, and small business owners always complain about the city government’s bureaucracy. food startup founders also fitted our other research interests. sharon recently worked with researchers in six cities in north america, europe, and east asia on a project about the globalization and gentrification of local shopping streets where food stores, restaurants, and cafés have a highly visible role (zukin, kasinitz and chen, 2016). ivana was studying activism among immigrant food workers in new york city. ivana and nga were researching the development of kitchen incubators, shared commercial kitchens where entrepreneurs rent space to prepare their products, which is cheaper than renting individually. these commercial kitchens may be social enterprises rather than for profit businesses. some are supported by the city government or nonprofit organizations that also offer mentorship to the founders. el/vc: how did the covid 19 pandemic affect your work? sz: in march 2020, when the covid pandemic began, we realized that it offered an excellent opportunity to study the resilience of food startup founders. of course, initially it was hard to see the public health disaster as an opportunity. because the pandemic hit new york sooner than most other cities in the u.s., it plunged us into a state of terrifying uncertainty. in the months before an effective vaccine was developed, the city experienced state mandated lockdowns, empty streets, and widespread unemployment. in mid march 2020, the governor of new york state shut down restaurants for indoor dining. over a million new yorkers filed claims for unemployment benefits from the state, people with second homes fled the city, everyone was scared. the food sector was hit hard by the pandemic, causing additional anxiety. business closures further isolated the sector. food stores, supermarkets and corner shops do not simply provide essentials, they are also important in terms of sociability. during the crisis, grocery store employees became “front line workers,” with a relational function   a “public” function   that was suddenly recognized as important. delivery people or deliveristas, as they are called because many of them have latino origins, were a lifeline to those who were unable or unwilling to enter indoor commercial spaces, even wearing a mask. however, the pandemic disrupted food supply chains, and stores often lacked key items. moreover, with the closure of thousands of restaurants, including fast food chains, cafés, and bars, more than 200,000 workers lost their livelihoods (sutton, 2020). the city and state governments lurched between shutdowns and partial re openings, which provoked disputes, not only over which activities would be affected, but over the division of authority between the mayor and the governor.1 yet, even in the early stages of the pandemic, the food sector had no choice but to adapt. the government followed its lead because the sector was too crucial and too big to fail. we wanted to learn about the specific adaptations to the crisis. so, ivana and nga reached out to the food startup founders, who they had interviewed before the pandemic (by email and phone). while nga focused on small business owners, who had produced and distributed food products in brick and mortar shops or through delivery chains, ivana concentrated on outdoor food markets where vendors cooked and sold prepared foods directly to customers. at this point, we were joined by tommy chung, who was writing his doctoral thesis on third wave coffee shops, while working as a barista. el/vc: what adaptations did you see citywide? sz: delivery companies from amazon to doordash expanded their workforce considerably. amazon shifted staff from other parts of their business to deliveries. restaurants became takeout shops and grocery stores, selling whole meals, culinary ingredients, and bottles of wine to retail customers. one of the major forms of adaptation, and perhaps the most controversial was outdoor dining for which the city government has still not established permanent rules. chefs and other restaurant workers, who had been laid off, prepared dishes, baked bread, and produced specialty foods in their kitchens at home and sold them to neighbors or through social media. some restaurants became “popups”, that is, temporary installations, on their own premises or in closed restaurants. many restaurant owners and their employees prepared meals for emergency services and hospital staff, and delivered meals to food pantries and schools for free distribution to people who had lost part of their income due to the crisis. street vendors adapted in different ways. although they all left central business districts because customers were no longer going to work, many set up their carts on local shopping streets in residential neighborhoods, especially those with large latino populations. according to the street vendor project, a nonprofit organization that represents their interests, “the number of vendors in corona plaza, along roosevelt avenue at 103rd street [in queens], rose nearly fourfold, from 20 30 people to more than 100” (salama 2022). some vendors who sold fruit and churros (deep fried pastry dough) on subway platforms without a license before the pandemic were more visible during the health crisis. in so doing, they tried to get closer to residents and to sell they products in the street, despite the risk of being booked or arrested by the police (marcius, 2022). el/vc: ivana, what adaptations did you see in the outdoor markets during the pandemic? ivana mellers: new york has several outdoor “destination” food markets, in brooklyn, queens, and the bronx, where vendors from around the world prepare and sell meals and snacks to eat on site. these markets operate on weekends from april to october. they have multiple functions. they are places of production, sale, and social interaction. vendors work either full or part time at home to prepare ingredients, which they transport on market days, and cook and sell at their stands. often they use the markets to start their business and test recipes and concepts until they are ready to expand into brick and mortar or online sales. some may want publicity to promote an existing business venture. locals and tourists visit these markets to socialize, try foods and experience cultures they haven’t found elsewhere. when the pandemic hit in march 2020, the markets’ plans to open as usual in april for the summer season came to a halt. in that first year, the markets devised three main strategies to remain operational: selling takeway food limiting capacity to welcome customers at the market, and establishing alternative distribution networks (mellers, 2022). the market organizers i spoke to did not want to compromise the spirit of the events. they carefully planned how to keep a sense of community, with safely as a priority. in 2021, when vaccines were available, and people were keen to resume a semblance of pre pandemic life, the outdoor markets offered an attractive option, compared to the spring of 2020. some markets continued to limit capacity with timed entry tickets, but most went back to operating as they had done before. for the 2022 season, the markets were no longer subject to the strict regulation imposed by the state in the early days of the pandemic. crowds of new yorkers and tourists were able to meet up with friends once more or come with their families to purchase foods, from pierogis to pakoras, offered by the city’s diverse population. el/vc: how did the latino vendors adapt to new conditions? did they return to “normal,” i.e. pre pandemic, business practices? did their businesses survive? im: my doctoral thesis is about how latin american small food business owners adapted to the pandemic. i am investigating how their social, economic, and cultural capital shapes their pandemic survival strategies. traditionally, owning a small business is a way for immigrants to become integrated or to obtain middle class status, especially because they are excluded from the wider labor market (sanders and nee 1996; waldinger, aldrich and ward, 1990). nonetheless, it is a risky path (alba and foner, 2015; light and gold, 2000; sanders and nee, 1996). however, there is now a new group of highly educated food startup founders, who see starting a food business as a “cool job”. they seek meaning in their work, by pursuing a craft (neff, wissinger and zukin, 2005; ocejo, 2017). these people often leave careers in highly paid jobs in marketing, finance, or law to start a food business, and the pandemic may have propelled more of them in this direction. in the past year, i have spoken to 1 prospective owner and 20 business owners from argentina, brazil, colombia, the dominican republic, honduras, mexico, panama, peru, and venezuela. some are immigrants and others are children of immigrants born in the united states. some of their businesses have existed for as long as two decades, while others opened during the pandemic. two closed in the first three months of 2022. for most people i spoke to, managing their business is a full time job. their products range from packaged goods made at a co packing facility, to dishes sold at outdoor destination markets, and meals sold in small stores. despite the challenges of the last few years, nearly everyone adapted to the lockdowns. they remained optimistic about the future. however, everyone had to change their approach to running a business, and these adaptations became the new norm. they added more delivery services, set up online sales, used social media to attract clients, and donated food to the community. some were able to access financial aid particularly ppp (paycheck payment protection) and other sba (small business association) loans from the u.s. government. some considered that the bureaucratic application process for a loan was not worth the time and energy. others did not apply because they did not think they would qualify. those who received aid used the money to pay employees and keep their businesses afloat. business owners did not have to repay the government loans if they were used to pay staff or to cover the costs of approved business expenses like rent, utilities, and certain supplies. however, they had to provide proof of how they spent the funds (sba, 2023). many businesses survived economically by switching their focus to delivery and to go sales. when they had products that could be shipped like baked goods or spices they boosted their online presence using their own websites, online platforms, or third party websites like amazon or milk street. social networks were used to communicate directly with consumers, sharing recipes, videos, and up to date information about deliveries and covid protocols. outdoor destination markets organized deliveries from their vendors to frontline workers in hospitals, while other business owners delivered food directly to community members in need. what i hear time and time again is that the pandemic conditions were tough, but running a small business is always challenging. although inflation has raised production costs, many business owners are reluctant to increase their prices. most refer to the pandemic as being in the past. they are thinking ahead to the future, about how to promote their business, and how to expand. a few business founders are even hoping to sell franchises to bring foods from their cultures to the mainstream across the u.s. el/vc: what is the current situation of the food sector in new york? sz: today, three years after the pandemic began, food stores are operating normally, yet there are still problems with supply chains and rising prices for butter, eggs, and most other foods. the streets are still filled with delivery bikes, but many stores provide their own delivery services, and personal in store shoppers hired by external services have been laid off. supermarket managers are eagerly discussing the potential uses of artificial intelligence tools like chatgpt for managing both inventory and customer services. this may be a rational response to uncertainty and labor shortages, but it is not good for jobs. el/vc: how did the measures taken during the pandemic have evolved? sz: as many as 12,000 restaurants still have some sort of outdoor dining. however, the city is being sued by community groups, who are upset about the rats, garbage, and the noise generated, as well as by the lack of space on sidewalks and in the streets for pedestrians and emergency vehicles like fire engines and ambulances. many people are also upset by the abandoned wooden dining sheds in the streets, which are now disused because the restaurants that built them have gone out of business. nonetheless, supporters of outdoor dining praise the amount of space that has been taken away from cars and “taken back” by pedestrians and green transport like bicycles. they feel that developing the city government’s “open streets” program has expanded the public realm. in the first year of the pandemic, some new yorkers celebrated the “europeanization” of the streets by outdoor dining, but the thrill has worn off. instead, there seems to be real satisfaction with socializing over food and drink in public view at least, that is the case for those who can afford it. a new use of time, featuring “all day dining,” or eating meals at nontraditional hours, has become the norm. for all these reasons, public opinion is in favor of making outdoor dining permanent, if the city government can establish and enforce rules for public health and safety. debates and tensions over street vending regulations have intensified since the pandemic. in response to the black lives matter protests in 2020 and to an often brutal police response, mayor de blasio announced that the police department would no longer be responsible for enforcing street vending laws and regulations (horn, 2020). since then, however, vendors have been increasingly booked for violations by both the department of consumer and worker protection and the police (fung, 2022). this year, in flushing, queens, tensions between street vendors and brick and mortar businesses increased when main street filled with vendors, many of whom had lost their jobs in the pandemic (chu, 2023). yet, the city government is trying to raise the minimum wage for delivery workers. although the city council moved in this direction in 2021, in the face of strong opposition by all the delivery companies, the adams administration has not yet proposed a wage level and payment structure that would be acceptable to all sides. the mayor’s most recent proposal, in march 2023, even lowered the minimum hourly wage being discussed, by 20 percent (irizarry aponte, 2023). meanwhile, investment is growing in new forms of urban agriculture, including agtech and vertical farming. these startups receive investments from private sector venture capital, as well as assistance from the new york city economic development corporation, a public organism. focused on improving local supply chains, they are located in both city owned labs and suburban industrial districts. el/vc: has the situation returned to normal? or do pandemic era changes have the potential to become permanent? sz: the situation of living with high risk has been normalized and internalized. indeed, the state and the city have eliminated nearly all the public health restrictions enacted in 2020. yet, the path to economic recovery is not completely clear. although restaurants, cafés, and bars are crowded, and new restaurants are opening every day, many storefronts are still vacant. concentrations of lifestyle amenities like art galleries, boutiques, and cafés have developed, especially in some brooklyn neighborhoods, where they represent both the potential “15 minute city” and the basis for gentrification. while the city maintains a voracious appetite for new food products and trends, rents are rising, wages are failing to keep pace, and food insecurity is a genuine problem (office of the new york state comptroller, 2023). el/v : has the pandemic changed the relation between the “innovation complex” in the tech industry and the food industry? your latest book, published in 2020 and entitled the innovation complex, examines the imprint of the "tech economy" on the city of new york. the investigation seeks to answer the following question: how has this new economy, supported since 2008 by new york city after the financial crisis, unfolded in concrete terms? has it been disrupted by the pandemic, in terms of locations, workspaces and lifestyles? has the pandemic changed the relation between the “innovation complex” in the tech industry and the food industry ? sz: my book the innovation complex (zukin, 2020) was published in march 2020, just days before people began to understand that we were fighting a pandemic. tech companies were the first businesses to close their offices and shift to remote working. of course, in many ways, they were the best prepared to do so. in my interviews, i discovered that even small startups often distributed work geographically; the founders and marketing team would live and work in new york, while they hired engineers in latin america or eastern europe. but, as you can see in the book, the tech community depended on face to face meetings to communicate new ideas and build trust, both of which are important when hiring skilled workers and raising investment capital. hackathons, incubators, accelerators, and co working spaces generated both a discourse and a practice of in person interaction. even venture capitalists insisted that their mentorship worked best if the startups they invested in were nearby. this remained a key element in their discourse even when their investments were dispersed around the u.s. and overseas. despite the continued predominance of remote working, tech companies and the businesses that cater to them have gradually returned to meeting in person, phasing out virtual conferences and virtual events like pitch days. although tech events were never very formal, they have become even less formal, regardless of whether they take place in venture capital firms’ offices, public parks, or cafés. no one knows if google’s new offices in hudson square, lower manhattan, will actually be filled with thousands of engineers as planned before the pandemic. other tech companies, from meta (formerly facebook) to twitter, have downsized their office space because they have reduced their work force. fewer people in smaller offices means there is less business in restaurants and cafés, especially in the central business districts of midtown and wall street. nevertheless, silicon valley venture capital firms continue to open branch offices in new york, workspaces for biotech and cybersecurity are growing, and the number of advertisements for tech jobs remains high. in any case, the tech firms are still concentrated in just a few areas of the city silicon alley in midtown south and lower manhattan; the brooklyn tech triangle in downtown brooklyn, the brooklyn navy yard, and dumbo; sunset park on the mid brooklyn waterfront. manhattan still has more than 70% of the city’s tech jobs, although tech employment in brooklyn, in second place with 12%, is growing a faster rate (hr&a, the new york city tech ecosystem, <https://www.hraadvisors.com/​portfolio/​nyc tech study>, october 2022). opening more restaurants and personal services that correspond to the tastes of highly educated, culturally forward tech and creative workers creates a 15 minute city for them. it also provides a material base for gentrification. alba, r. and foner, n. (2015), strangers no more: immigration and the challenges of integration in north america in north america and western europe, princeton, princeton university press. chu, h. (2023), “street vendors out of control, says flushing council member”, the city, 13 march, <https://www.thecity.nyc/2023/3/13/23636277/flushing street vendors sandra ung dcwp nypd> (consulté le 21 mars 2023). fung, k. (2022), “street vendor tickets are on the rise, a year after city moved enforcement from nypd”, gothamist, 24 january, <https://gothamist.com/news/street vendor tickets are rise year after city moved enforcement nypd> (consulté le 21 mars 2023). horn, a. (2020), “de blasio promises cuts to nypd, ends nyc curfew”, npr, 7 june, <https://www.npr.org/sections/live updates protests for racial justice/2020/06/07/871746452/de blasio promises cuts to nypd ends nyc curfew> (consulté le 23 mars 2023). hr&a (2022), “the new york city tech ecosystem study”, october <https://www.hraadvisors.com/portfolio/nyc tech study> (consulté le 23 mars 2023). irizarry aponte, c. (2023), “adams rolls back $24 an hour minimum pay rate for delivery workers”, the city, 7 march, <https://www.thecity.nyc/work/2023/3/7/23628857/delivery workers minimum wage nyc> (consulté le 23 mars 2023). light, i. and gold s. (2000), ethnic economie,. bingley, emerald group publishing. marcius, c.r. (2022), “adams defends police for handcuffing vendor who sold mangoes in subway”, new york times, 9 may, <https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/09/nyregion/subway safety food vendor brooklyn.html> (consulté le 23 mars 2023). mellers, i. (2022), “covid 19 transformed new york’s destination food markets”, metropolitics, 5 october, <https://metropolitics.org/covid 19 transformed new york s destination food markets.html> (consulté le 23 mars 2023). neff, g., wissinger, e. and zukin, s. (2005), “entrepreneurial labor among cultural producers: ‘cool’ jobs in ‘hot’ industries,” social semiotics, 15, 3, p. 307 334. ocejo, r. (2017), masters of craft: old jobs in the new urban economy. princeton, princeton university press. office of the new york state comptroller (2023), “new yorkers in need: food insecurity and nutritional assistance programs”, mars, <https://www.osc.state.ny.us/reports/new yorkers need food insecurity and nutritional assistance programs> (consulté le 23 mars 2023). salama, j. (2022), “more than 300 languages are spoken along this nyc street”, national geographic, 18 april, <https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/more than 300 languages are spoken along this nyc street?rid=386524cfd1af6ed8bf8fd0aa9d773a7f&cmpid=org=ngp::mc=crm email::src=ngp::cmp=editorial::add=compass_20230304> (consulté le 23 mars 2023). sanders, j. and nee, v. (1996), “immigrant self employment: the family as social capital and the value of human capital”, american sociological review, 61, 2, p. 231 249. sba (small business administration) (2023), “covid relief options”, <https://www.sba.gov/funding programs/loans/covid 19 relief options> (consulté le 23 mars 2023). sutton, r. (2020), “new unemployment numbers show nyc has lost two thirds of its food jobs”, eater, 23 june, <https://ny.eater.com/2020/6/23/21299879/unemployment hospitality jobs covid pandemic nyc restaurants > (consulté le 23 mars 2023). waldinger, r., howard, a. and ward, r. (1990), ethnic entrepreneurs: immigrant business in industrial societies, newbury park, sage publications. warerkar, t. (2020), “a timeline of covid 19’s impact on nyc’s restaurant industry”, eater, 30 december, <https://ny.eater.com/2020/12/30/22203053/nyc coronavirus timeline restaurants bars 2020> (consulté le 23 mars 2023). zukin, s. (2020), the innovation complex: cities, tech, and the new economy, new york, oxford university press. zukin, s., kasinitz, p. and chen, x. (2016), global cities, local streets: everyday diversity from new york to shanghai, new york, routledge. 1 for a timeline of 2020 in the city’s restaurant industry, see warerkar, 2020. sharon zukin et ivana mellers, « the covid 19 pandemic in new york’s food sector: how small businesses, restaurants, and outdoor markets adapted », métropoles [en ligne], 33 | 2023, mis en ligne le 01 novembre 2023, consulté le 08 février 2025. url : http://journals.openedition.org/metropoles/10156 ; doi : https://doi.org/10.4000/metropoles.10156 professor emerita of sociology and of earth and environmental sciences, brooklyn college and graduate center of the city university of new york ph.d. candidate in sociology, brooklyn college and graduate center of the city university of new york le texte seul est utilisable sous licence cc by nc nd 4.0. les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire. issn électronique 1957 7788 voir la notice dans le catalogue openedition plan du site   contacts   mentions légales et crédits   flux de syndication politique de confidentialité   gestion des cookies   signaler un problème nous adhérons à openedition journals   édité avec lodel   accès réservé you will be redirected to openedition search

thank you to chairperson levin and the members of the committee on general welfare and hunger for the opportunity to submit written testimony regarding the “status of hunger in nyc and the impact of covid.” i am providing this testimony on behalf of the hunter college new york city food policy center, of which i am the executive director. the center was created in 2012 to develop collaborative, innovative and evidence based solutions to prevent diet related diseases, promote healthy eating and reduce food insecurity in new york city and other urban centers. the center works with policy makers, community organizations, advocates and the public to create healthier, more sustainable food environments. we thank the city council and the speaker’s office for their support of our center. “where is my next meal coming from?” it’s a question that more than a million new yorkers asked themselves before the pandemic, are asking themselves today, and will, unfortunately, be asking themselves tomorrow. it’s a question no one should ever need to ask in one of the world’s wealthiest cities. healthy food is a basic human right, and no new yorker should ever have to experience hunger and not know where their next meal is coming from. defining hunger and food insecurity before examining how hunger and food insecurity are afflicting new york city residents, it is important to understand the distinction between the two concepts. the usda defines food insecurity as the “limited or uncertain availability of nutritionally adequate and safe foods or limited or uncertain ability to acquire acceptable foods in socially acceptable ways,” and adds that food insecure households report three specific conditions: this is different from hunger, which can be a consequence of food insecurity and refers to a physiological sensation, as opposed to an economic and/or social situation. individuals who are experiencing hunger may be experiencing food insecurity as well; however, hunger can result from missing a meal or meals for reasons other than food insecurity.2 while the definition of food insecurity may be clear to academics, politicians and government staffers, a study reported by this center in 2018 demonstrated that, even among new yorkers who are food insecure, many struggle to define what that actually means   in fact more than two thirds of those surveyed were unable to define food insecurity. why is this significant? because, in order to design appropriate interventions with successful outcomes for the diverse populations we are trying to serve, everyone involved must have the same understanding of the terminology and problem. the existing differences in understanding (or lack thereof), especially among those who are food insecure, suggest the need for a greater emphasis on food policy education, including the establishment of commonly accepted terminology. hunger and food insecurity in nyc food insecurity is a public health crisis across america, and new york city (nyc) is no exception. hunger and food insecurity are pervasive throughout nyc, impacting more than a million new yorkers even before the covid 19 pandemic reached the city.3 now, while vaccination rates climb and city life returns, hunger and food insecurity remain critical issues for many households across the five boroughs.4 furthermore, hunger, food insecurity, and poor access to healthy food disproportionately impact underserved communities of color.5,6 hunger and food insecurity can have devastating effects on an individual’s health. lack of access to healthy foods can lead to nutrient deficient diets that might cause diet related diseases such as hypertension and diabetes.7 poor health related to hunger and food insecurity can also impact covid 19 outcomes, increasing the risk of hospitalization and death from the disease.8 households with children are known to have higher rates of hunger and food insecurity than those without.9 hunger and food insecurity have a negative impact on the well being of children, potentially leading to long term behavioral and psychological problems10 as well as chronic illness.11 no child should be hungry or food insecure and no parents should have to choose between feeding themselves and feeding their children. since the 2017 2018 school year, public schools in nyc have provided free lunch to all students regardless of income,12 a policy that is known to have had a positive effect on student well being and performance.13 the impact of covid 19 on hunger and food insecurity in nyc the covid 19 pandemic has greatly impacted the food system in new york city. nyc worked quickly and aggressively to address the increase in food insecurity brought on by the pandemic, but many city agencies struggled to adapt and expand their food provision programs to meet specific cultural or dietary needs. and many of the solutions spearheaded by the city government were not designed to continue indefinitely. now, more than a year into the pandemic, the city is still struggling to reduce food insecurity, hunger, and diet related diseases. while clearly acknowledging the extent of the city’s food insecurity and hunger problems, officials have been unwilling to provide transparency and information that would allow us to determine what lessons have been learned, and whether officials enlisted the partnership of knowledgeable neighborhood organizations. our aim cannot be to return to the pre pandemic normal, as that would still leave approximately 1.2 million people hungry and food insecure.14 in order to eliminate hunger in nyc, we need long term solutions to ensure that all new yorkers have access to healthy, nutritious meals at home, at school, and at work. at this moment, it remains difficult to determine how many new yorkers are experiencing food insecurity because extensive surveys and studies have not yet been completed. but we do know that the number of people experiencing food insecurity and hunger in the city nearly doubled during the pandemic, from 1.2 million to estimates between 1.5 and 2 million people,15,16 and the diet quality for many new yorkers decreased.17 and a survey of mothers with young children done in april 2020 indicated that nearly one in five stated that the children were not eating enough.18 programs that existed before the pandemic were ill equipped to handle this massive increase in demand. reports from food pantries and other emergency food providers suggest that funding and food supplies may not have been adequate to cover their needs.19 three out of four food pantries and soup kitchens saw an increase in the total number of visitors compared to year before,20 including a 71 percent increase in undocumented immigrant clients.21 and two of the largest emergency feeding programs, city harvest and food bank for new york city, have reported significant strain on their systems.22 unemployment rates skyrocketed in the first months of the pandemic, and through 2020 the city lost more than 600,000 jobs.23 the unemployment rate in nyc has reduced significantly since then,24 but as of may 2021 9.8 percent of new yorkers were still unemployed, which is higher than the national average of 5.8 percent.25,26 unemployment and poverty are frequently tied to hunger and food insecurity, as they can lead to difficulty affording enough food for everyone in a household.27 furthermore, declining unemployment rates do not always lead to decreased hunger and food insecurity, as many working individuals and families still have trouble affording enough food, particularly food that is high in nutritional value.28,29 government funding (from federal,30 state31 and local32 governments) was quickly poured into the nyc food system to feed hungry residents, but at times it was still not enough to get every single person an appropriate amount and variety of food, causing problems for some government led food delivery initiatives, including getfoodnyc. food was delivered to incorrect addresses33 and there were complaints about foods being spoiled, unhealthy, or not culturally appropriate.34,35 these complaints are not new   food pantries and community members have historically experienced the sentiment from emergency food providers that individuals in need should take what they get and should not get upset, which is morally reprehensible. during the pandemic, many community organizations and individuals pivoted to focus more on connecting those in need with food resources in their neighborhoods, filling in gaps. faith based organizations, community centers, restaurants, and nonprofits became hubs for food and meal distribution.36 unfortunately, residents sometimes waited in lines for hours to receive kitchen staples such as rice and canned goods and many people struggled to get by on diets lacking in protein and other fresh foods.37 while the work done by these organizations was impressive and necessary, many did not have the resources required to meet the needs of all residents. furthermore, emergency food relief is not a long term solution to the hunger and food insecurity crisis, and new yorkers cannot permanently depend on emergency programs to keep themselves fed. emergency food should be just that   food provided during an emergency. it should not be a system that new yorkers in need have to rely on every day for food. we need increased snap benefits, livable wages, and creative solutions from our local government to ensure all new yorkers have agency and access to nutritious food. new york city lacks communication regarding important food resources city leaders, community based organizations, and other community members have acknowledged that, at the beginning of the pandemic, there was a lack of centralized information about food resources. nyc agencies worked to provide information about food pantries and soup kitchens, but this information was not always complete or delivered in ways that all residents could access and understand. in response to the covid 19 pandemic, and to address these concerns, the center, collaborating with nyc agencies and community based organizations, developed coronavirus nyc neighborhood food resource guides for each of nyc’s 59 community districts. each guide provides information specific to the district, including the following: these guides comprise the most comprehensive public database to provide nyc residents with an up to date overview of the various food and social service resources available to them specifically about food in their community. additionally, the guides can serve as a useful template that can be replicated for other communities. in addition to being widely used by nyc residents in need, the center’s coronavirus nyc neighborhood food resource guides are actively used by community leaders, academics, journalists, the nyc department of health and mental hygiene, the mayor’s office, the nyc council, local policymakers, and a variety of other local public and private facing databases. the coronavirus nyc neighborhood food resource guides offer an invaluable service at a time of unprecedented need. while some organizations track information on specific kinds of services they offer or that are offered within the community, the center’s guides are alone in their effort to collate a comprehensive, public online database of food assistance and social services in nyc. crucially, the center maintains daily updates of the guides, with a range of 15 to 60 volunteers per week making calls to check for changes in service information. this system keeps community members up to date on the frequent and rapid changes to the services on which they depend. disparities in the food system among new york city communities as the pandemic recedes and many new yorkers rejoice in their new found freedom, many others still suffer from homelessness, joblessness, food insecurity, and hunger. ensuring that nyc residents have enough food, and that the food is high quality and nutritionally dense, is critical, especially in light of the impact nutrition has on diet related diseases and outcomes of covid 19. the nyc economy is rapidly recovering, yet the number of new yorkers experiencing hunger and food insecurity is still high, especially among black and latinx residents.38 demand at food pantries across the city is still higher than it was before the pandemic.39 some of this increased need can be explained by larger problems within the food system, including low wages and structural racism.40 in order to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in the new york city food system, we cannot continue to rely on emergency food relief programs. innovative solutions that address the underlying issues of poverty and social inequity must be considered. gaps that existed before the pandemic between affluent and underserved communities were widened by covid 19.41,42 healthy, affordable food is not distributed equitably throughout the city, and many underserved communities (particularly marginalized communities of color) do not have adequate access to healthy, affordable options.43,44 these communities are sometimes known as “food deserts,” but that is not an accurate term   food is available in these communities, but it is often highly processed and unhealthy.45 a more accurate way to refer to the disparity in food access among new york city neighborhoods would be to call it “food apartheid,” a phrase that draws attention to the systemic social and racial inequities that cause unequal access to healthy food.46 communities affected by food apartheid are those in which nutritious food is unavailable and unhealthy fast food provides a disproportionately high percentage of people’s diet.47 the lack of healthy food options in underserved communities is a systemic issue that will require innovative, community driven interventions to correct.48 in a june 2021 report from the new york state health foundation, approximately 20 percent of hispanic adults and 12 percent of black adults reported that their households accessed free meals or groceries, compared to 8 percent of asian adults and 4 percent of white adults in march 2021.49 as the nyc economy grows, many new yorkers are still struggling with hunger and food insecurity. this is especially prevalent among black and hispanic residents, who have not seen the same level of economic recovery as their white neighbors.50 in march 2021, households of color reported more losses in employment and income than white households.51 furthermore, nyc’s 59 unique neighborhoods are vibrant and racially, religiously, and culturally diverse, meaning that different neighborhoods and groups have different food needs, many of which were not met by the programs city agencies offered. in order to find culturally appropriate food, many new yorkers had to rely on local mutual aid networks and community based organizations rather than turning to city programs. while these grassroots efforts are valuable, they are unsustainable as a long term solution to hunger and food insecurity. city agencies should communicate more effectively with these groups and use their insights in order to better tailor food relief efforts to the needs of particular households and communities. what’s been done to alleviate hunger and food insecurity in new york city, and what still needs to be done many programs and organizations emerged as a direct result of the covid 19 pandemic to help the new yorkers most in need. some emergency food relief programs and initiatives that began as a result of the pandemic have become permanent parts of the new york food system, which will help alleviate hunger and food insecurity for more communities long term. when schools closed in march of 2020, the nyc department of education moved quickly to provide take out meals to ensure that the students who relied on school meals were not left hungry.52 despite this effort, however, the total number of meals distributed at schools in 2020 was significantly lower than pre pandemic levels.53 these take out meals are still available at all schools and recipients are not required to provide any registration, identification or documentation. furthermore, community members in need (who are not students or family of students) can also go to specific schools to pick up meals without any registration or identification.54 with schools closing for summer break, however, hunger and food insecurity may increase in communities that rely on these meals. grab and go community meals will still be available during the summer months,55 but outreach must be done to ensure that communities know about the places where they can get the meals. historically, summer meal participation has been low in new york city.56 we need to explore creative solutions to ensure that no student or community member goes hungry.57 as previously mentioned, beginning march of 2020, nyc launched getfoodnyc, a food delivery program for residents who could not acquire food on their own.58 one year after the program began, the city had delivered more than 200 million meals to new yorkers in need.59 however, the program was not without its problems: numerous complaints were filed about the quality of the food delivered.60, 61 some people thought that the food was inequitably distributed between communities, as some recipients were given high quality meals, while others received boxes full of snack foods.62 furthermore, in the summer of 2020, nyc’s getfoodnyc program changed their enrollment procedures, which caused difficulty accessing the program for many of the city’s less than tech savvy seniors.63 one of the most successful programs has been the pandemic electronic benefit transfer (p ebt), which began in 2020 as a response to the pandemic school closures that swept across the country. students regularly eligible for free or reduced price meals under the national school lunch act, but who were not attending in person school for five consecutive days, were provided with ebt cards loaded with temporary emergency nutrition benefits.64 according to the ny times, “the program, which delivers $880 million to new york state, was paid for by the federal government, a result of the economic relief package passed by congress in the earliest phases of the coronavirus outbreak. the sum of $420 was meant to equal the cost of meals that a child would have received in the spring had school been open.”65 additionally, an additional $1320 in food benefits to cover missed school meals might be sent to nyc public school families.66,67 new york state was approved to operate p ebt for the 2019 2020 and 2020 2021 school years,68 but has not yet received approval to fund a p ebt program for the summer of 2021. nourish new york, an initiative announced by governor andrew cuomo in april 2020,69 connects surplus food from new york farms with state residents experiencing hunger and food insecurity. the initiative purchases the food from farmers and delivers it to food banks across the state. in may 2021, the new york state legislature unanimously passed a bill to make nourish new york permanent, which will support farmers while improving food security in urban and rural areas.70 this program is vital to promoting the success of new york grown produce while also encouraging statewide connections between food producers and consumers. food pantries in nyc received an emergency $25 million from the city in april 2020,71 but these funds ran out by the end of the year. activists called on the mayor’s office to renew the funding in 2021,72 but this renewal has not happened. however, in june 2021, the usda announced funding for the country’s food bank network that would include money to support local, regional, and socially disadvantaged farmers in order to address racial inequality in the country’s food system.73 in order to alleviate hunger, policy must acknowledge and actively confront the racial and socioeconomic disparities that already exist. we applaud city agencies, community organizations, and residents for their quick response to the food crisis exacerbated by the covid 19 pandemic. however, we must now reflect on what happened and review mistakes made in order to see how we can do better for the people of nyc going forward. we must create strategies to eliminate hunger, food insecurity, and diet related disease and give people the basic human right to healthy food for every meal. hunger, food insecurity, food justice, and reducing diet related disease should be amongst the top issues in the next mayoral election and a key priority for the next mayor. in fact, we suggest creating a new position in the city hall team   a deputy mayor for food and water, who would be responsible for hunger and food insecurity initiatives, diet related chronic disease reduction, and coordination of these programs across agencies and communities. he or she would be a crucial public presence to demonstrate to new yorkers that the city is prepared to meet the needs of its most vulnerable residents and ensure the right to healthy and nutritious food for all. every new yorker deserves access to healthy, affordable food. and when food insecurity, hunger, and diet related disease persist, the city government needs to intervene in order to make sure that no new yorker ever has to think: “where is my next meal coming from?” recommendations references [1] definitions of food security. usda. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food nutrition assistance/food security in the us/definitions of food security.aspx. accessed june 24, 2020. [2] definitions of food security. usda. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food nutrition assistance/food security in the us/definitions of food security.aspx. accessed june 24, 2020.[3] hunger in nyc. city harvest. https://www.cityharvest.org/food insecurity/. accessed june 23, 2021.[4] continuing impact of the covid 19 pandemic on food scarcity in new york. nys health. https://nyshealthfoundation.org/resource/continuing impact of the covid 19 pandemic on food scarcity in new york/#employment income loss overall. published june 1, 2021.[5] trinidad a, camden h, coleman a. improving access to food systems among communities of color: a food justice issue. center to advance racial equity, portland state university. https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/18004. published april 2015.[6] nittle n. people of color are at greater risk of covid 19. systemic racism in the food system plays a role. civil eats. https://civileats.com/2020/05/05/people of color are at greater risk of covid 19 systemic racism in the food system plays a role/. published may 5, 2020.[7] hunger and health. feeding america. https://www.feedingamerica.org/research/hunger and health research. accessed june 23, 2021.[8] sanyaolu a, okorie c, marinkovic a, patidar r, younis k, desai p, hosein z, padda i, mangat j, altaf m. comorbidity and its impact on patients with covid 19. sn comprehensive clinical medicine 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399 020 00363 4. published june 25, 2020.[9] the impact of the coronavirus on food insecurity in 2020 & 2021. feeding america. https://www.feedingamerica.org/sites/default/files/2021 03/national%20projections%20brief_3.9.2021_0.pdf. published march 2021.[10] olson c. nutrition and health outcomes associated with food insecurity and hunger. the journal of nutrition 129(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/129.2.521s. published february 1999.[11] weinreb l, wehler c, perloff j, scott r, hosmer d, sagor l, gundersen c. hunger: its impact on children’s health and mental health. pediatrics 110(4). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.110.4.e41. published october 2002.[12] byfield e. all nyc public school students are now eligible for free lunches. nbc new york. https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/universal free lunch new york city/266939/. published september 6, 2017.[13] schwartz a, rothbart m. let them eat lunch: the impact of universal free meals on student performance. syracuse university maxwell school center for policy research. https://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedfiles/cpr/publications/working_papers2/wp203.pdf. published july 2019.[14] hunger in nyc. city harvest. https://www.cityharvest.org/food insecurity/. accessed june 23, 2021.[15] stewart n, heisler t. 1.5 million new yorkers can’t afford food. pantries are their lifeline. new york times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/10/20/nyregion/nyc food banks.html. published october 20, 2020.[16] mann b. in new york city, 2 million residents face food insecurity, officials say. npr. https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus live updates/2020/05/21/860312565/in new york city 2 million residents face food insecurity officials say. published may 21, 2020.[17] wilkins j. challenges and opportunities created by the covid 19 pandemic. journal of nutrition education and behavior 52 (7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2020.05.005. published may 21, 2020.[18] bauer l. the covid 19 crisis has already left too many children hungry in america. brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up front/2020/05/06/the covid 19 crisis has already left too many children hungry in america/. published may 6, 2020.[19] ny food 20/20: visions, research, and recommendations during covid 19 and beyond. the hunter college nyc food policy center, the laurie m. tisch center for food, education & policy, and the cuny urban food policy institute. https://www.nycfoodpolicy.org/wp content/uploads/2020/10/ny2020 finalv2.pdf. published october 2020.[20] new yorkers don’t live single issue lives: the intersections of hunger. food bank for new york city. https://1giqgs400j4830k22r3m4wqg wpengine.netdna ssl.com/wp content/uploads/intersections of hunger_nyc hunger conference report_02.13.20.pdf. published february 2020.[21] fighting more than covid19: unmasking the state of hunger in nyc during a pandemic. food bank for new york city. https://www.foodbanknyc.org/fighting more than covid 19/. accessed june 23, 2020.[22] ny food 20/20: visions, research, and recommendations during covid 19 and beyond. the hunter college nyc food policy center, the laurie m. tisch center for food, education & policy, and the cuny urban food policy institute. https://www.nycfoodpolicy.org/wp content/uploads/2020/10/ny2020 finalv2.pdf. published october 2020.[23] david g. nyc lost a record 631,000 jobs to the pandemic in 2020. so what’s next? the city. https://www.thecity.nyc/economy/2021/3/14/22326414/nyc lost record jobs to pandemic unemployment. published march 14, 2021.[24] darmanjian s. ny’s unemployment rate rebounding to almost pre pandemic levels. news10. https://www.news10.com/news/nys unemployment rate rebounding to almost pre pandemic levels/. published may 27, 2021.[25] state labor department releases preliminary may 2021 area unemployment rates. new york state department of labor.https://dol.ny.gov/system/files/documents/2021/06/state labor department releases preliminary may 2021 area unemployment rates.pdf. published june 22, 2021.[26] the employment situation   may 2021. bureau of labor statistics. u.s. department of labor. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf.[27] from paycheck to pantry: hunger in working america. feeding america and oxfam america. https://www.feedingamerica.org/sites/default/files/research/hunger in working america/from paycheck to pantry.pdf. published november 18, 2014.[28] from paycheck to pantry: hunger in working america. feeding america and oxfam america. https://www.feedingamerica.org/sites/default/files/research/hunger in working america/from paycheck to pantry.pdf. published november 18, 2014.[29] lewis c, jeffrey wilensky j. widespread hunger persists even as new york’s economy recovers. gothamist. https://gothamist.com/food/widespread hunger persists even as new yorks economy recovers. published june 8, 2021.[30] usda announces coronavirus food assistance program. usda. https://www.usda.gov/media/press releases/2020/04/17/usda announces coronavirus food assistance program. published april 17, 2020.[31] new york state announces $880 million in temporary food assistance for new york’s school children. new york state office of temporary and disability assistance. https://otda.ny.gov/news/2020/2020 05 12.asp. published may 12, 2020.[32] durkin e. nyc launches $170m plan to combat hunger, urges grocery stores to require masks. politico. https://www.politico.com/states/new york/albany/story/2020/04/15/nyc launches 170m plan to combat hunger urges grocery stores to require masks 1276463. published april 15, 2020.[33] marsh j. free meals meant for nyc’s needy left at wrong address   since may. new york post. https://nypost.com/2020/07/29/free city meals meant for needy left at wrong address since may/. published july 29, 2020.[34] demanding answers: nyc’s covid 19 program accused of delivering spoiled food, items with no nutrition value. cbs new york. https://newyork.cbslocal.com/2020/05/18/demanding answers nycs covid 19 program accused of delivering spoiled food items with no nutrition value/. published may 18, 2020.[35] blau r. food insecure new yorkers seek more meal deliveries from city. the city. https://www.thecity.nyc/2021/1/13/22230215/food insecure new yorkers seek more meal deliveries from the city. published january 13, 2021.[36] margolies j, strauss a. hunger is worsening. here are 7 ways new yorkers are addressing it. new york times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/11/nyregion/coronavirus hunger relief nyc.html. published july 11, 2020.[37] lerner s. “we need protein”: coronavirus pandemic deepens new york’s hunger crisis. the intercept. https://theintercept.com/2020/06/16/coronavirus hunger crisis nyc/. published june 16, 2020.[38] rates of food insecurity remain high despite expansion of new york city food assistance programs. cuny school of public health. https://sph.cuny.edu/life at sph/news/2020/10/14/food insecurity covid release/. published october 14, 2020.[39] lewis c, jeffrey wilensky j. widespread hunger persists even as new york’s economy recovers. gothamist. https://gothamist.com/food/widespread hunger persists even as new yorks economy recovers. published june 8, 2021.[40] nargi l. new research highlights a shifting priority at food banks: tackling the root causes of food insecurity. the counter. https://thecounter.org/new research shifting priority food banks covid 19/. published june 8, 2021.[41] reeves r, rothwell j. class and covid: how the less affluent face double risks. brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up front/2020/03/27/class and covid how the less affluent face double risks/. published march 27, 2020.[42] miranda l. how the coronavirus has widened the chasm between rich and poor. nbc news. https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business news/how coronavirus has widened chasm between rich poor n1240622. published september 24, 2020.[43] feller m. healthy food is a right for black people, not a privilege. healthline. https://www.healthline.com/health/nutrition/black communities need access to healthy food. published october 12, 2020.[44] azétsop j, joy t. access to nutritious food, socioeconomic individualism and public health ethics in the usa: a common good approach. azétsop, jacquineau, and tisha r joy. “access to nutritious food, socioeconomic individualism and public health ethics in the usa: a common good approach.” philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine 8(16). https://dx.doi.org/10.1186%2f1747 5341 8 16. published october 29, 2013.[45] tracy. food apartheid: the silent killer in the black community. atlanta black star. https://atlantablackstar.com/2015/06/16/food apartheid the silent killer in the black community/. published june 16, 2015.[46] brones a. karen washington: it’s not a food desert, it’s food apartheid. guernica. https://www.guernicamag.com/karen washington its not a food desert its food apartheid/. published may 7, 2018.[47] tracy. food apartheid: the silent killer in the black community. atlanta black star. https://atlantablackstar.com/2015/06/16/food apartheid the silent killer in the black community/. published june 16, 2015.[48] food apartheid: racialized access to healthy affordable food. natural resources defence council and nation of change. https://www.nationofchange.org/2021/04/07/food apartheid racialized access to healthy affordable food/. april 7, 2021.[49] continuing impact of the covid 19 pandemic on food scarcity in new york. nys health. https://nyshealthfoundation.org/resource/continuing impact of the covid 19 pandemic on food scarcity in new york/#employment income loss overall. published june 1, 2021.[50] lewis c, jeffrey wilensky j. widespread hunger persists even as new york’s economy recovers. gothamist. https://gothamist.com/food/widespread hunger persists even as new yorks economy recovers. published june 8, 2021.[51] continuing impact of the covid 19 pandemic on food scarcity in new york. nys health. https://nyshealthfoundation.org/resource/continuing impact of the covid 19 pandemic on food scarcity in new york/#employment income loss overall. published june 1, 2021.[52] shapiro e. new york city public schools to close to slow spread of coronavirus. new york times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/15/nyregion/nyc schools closed.html. published march 15, 2020.[53] zimmerman a. nyc schools served 96 million fewer meals to children amid the pandemic, new data show. chalkbeat. https://ny.chalkbeat.org/2021/6/2/22465642/nyc school food hunger grab go pandemic. published june 2, 2021.[54] community meals. nyc department of education. https://www.schools.nyc.gov/school life/food/community meals. accessed june 24, 2021.[55] free meals for new yorkers this summer. access nyc. https://access.nyc.gov/programs/community meals/. accessed june 24, 2021.[56] zimmerman a. nyc schools served 96 million fewer meals to children amid the pandemic, new data show. chalkbeat. https://ny.chalkbeat.org/2021/6/2/22465642/nyc school food hunger grab go pandemic. published june 2, 2021.[57] fu j, kang j. 30 million children rely on free school lunch. where do they eat when school’s out? the counter. https://thecounter.org/summer hunger new york city/. published july 3, 2018.[58] new program helps new yorkers who cannot afford food delivery. downtown alliance. https://downtownny.com/news/getfoodnyc food deliveries sign up/. published march 25, 2020.[59] city distributes 200 million meals through getfoodnyc emergency programs. amsterdam news. https://amsterdamnews.com/news/2021/feb/18/city distributes 200 million meals through getfood/. published february 18, 2021.[60] demanding answers: nyc’s covid 19 program accused of delivering spoiled food, items with no nutrition value. cbs new york. https://newyork.cbslocal.com/2020/05/18/demanding answers nycs covid 19 program accused of delivering spoiled food items with no nutrition value/. published may 18, 2020.[61] blau r. food insecure new yorkers seek more meal deliveries from city. the city. https://www.thecity.nyc/2021/1/13/22230215/food insecure new yorkers seek more meal deliveries from the city. published january 13, 2021.[62] todd a. snacks and “gourmet salads”: the wide variety of meals offered by nyc’s food program. gothamist. https://gothamist.com/food/snacks and gourmet salads wide variety meals offered nycs food program. published may 24, 2020.[63] blau r. city food delivery changes could be leaving many seniors hungry. the city. https://www.thecity.nyc/2020/8/25/21401772/city food delivery changes senior citizens. published august 25, 2020.[64] state guidance on coronavirus p ebt. usda. https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/state guidance coronavirus pandemic ebt pebt. accessed june 24, 2021.[65] why giving food stamps to the rich is not a terrible idea. ny times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/18/nyregion/coronavirus food stamps nyc schools.html. accessed june 25, 2021.[66] nyc public school families to get up to $1,320 per child in food help. the city. https://www.thecity.nyc/2021/6/14/22534040/nyc public school families get food relief money. accessed june 25, 2021.[67] frequently asked questions for the pandemic electronic benefit transfer (p ebt) food benefits. office of temporary and disability assistance. https://otda.ny.gov/snap covid 19/frequently asked questions pandemic ebt.asp. accessed june 25, 2021.[68] new york: covid 19 waivers & flexibilities. usda. https://www.fns.usda.gov/disaster/pandemic/covid 19/new york#snap. accessed june 24, 2021.[69] nourish new york. new york state department of agriculture and markets. https://agriculture.ny.gov/nourishny. accessed june 24, 2021.[70] siegal c. ny bill passes to establish permanent ‘nourish new york’ program. news10. https://www.news10.com/news/ny capitol news/ny bill passes to establish permanent nourish new york program/. published may 28, 2021.[71] shahrigian s. mayor de blasio touts $25 million in emergency food funding during visit to brooklyn pantry. ny daily news. https://www.nydailynews.com/coronavirus/ny coronavirus new york city pantries bill de blasio 20200414 ygfwtbplxjcuhnulxzf2rxd3ui story.html. published april 14, 2020.[72] shahrigian s. mayor de blasio urged to renew $25 million emergency funding for nyc food pantries. ny daily news. https://www.nydailynews.com/coronavirus/ny covid nyc food pantry funding de blasio 20210118 ah4flendabajbjzj3dy5tltdmy story.html. published january 18, 2021.[73] usda to invest $1 billion to purchase healthy food for food insecure americans and build food bank capacity. usda. https://www.usda.gov/media/press releases/2021/06/04/usda invest 1 billion purchase healthy food food insecure americans. published june 4, 2021. photo credit: food bank for new york city write for the new york city food policy center is always on the look out for innovative, intelligent writers who can produce high quality, research based content. read more here: https://nycfoodpolicy.org/write nyc food policy center/ copyright © 2021 hunter college new york city food policy center. all rights reserved.

of working aged households in new york city are struggling to make ends meet. even before the covid 19 pandemic, too many new yorkers were struggling to make ends meet 50% of working age households in new york city or nearly 3 million people do not make enough to afford basic fixed expenses like rent, and utilities, as well as food, according to the recent true cost of living report released by the fund for new york city and united way for new york city in partnership with city harvest. this comes amid high costs for housing and food and following the expiration of vital government supports that kept many families afloat during the pandemic. people experiencing food insecurity may not know when or where their next meal will come from. often, food is the first elastic expense in a budget that gets cut if a household also needs to pay for expenses like rent, utilities, childcare, or medical bills. to be considered self sufficient, a family with two adults, one preschool aged child, and one school aged child now needs to make more than $100,000 in all five boroughs. nearly 1.3 million new yorkers are struggling to feed themselves and their families. too many of our neighbors are experiencing food insecurity particularly in the marginalized communities that city harvest has long served. we know that hunger doesn’t fall equally across the city. it hits particularly hard in the communities of color that have been disproportionately harmed by decades of policy inequities and systemic failures. no new yorker no matter who they are or where they come from should have to worry about where their next meal will come from. city harvest is committed to providing free nutritious food to every new yorker who finds themselves in need of food assistance. children in new york city are experiencing food insecurity. while economic challenges hit every corner of new york city over the last few years, the effect on families and children has been particularly pronounced. over the past year, average monthly visits to food pantries, soup kitchens, and community food programs across the five boroughs by families with children jumped 100% compared to 2019, the largest surge in pantry visits among various age groups. since the start of the covid 19 pandemic, many vital pandemic era government supports like the child tax credit and emergency snap allotments have expired, leaving many families with even fewer resources. increase in average monthly visits to food pantries and soup kitchens since 2019. according to a city harvest analysis of feednyc data, average monthly visits to soup kitchens and food pantries across nyc are up 75% compared to pre pandemic levels. a family or household may experience food insecurity for a brief period of time (for example, while a parent is between jobs) or for much longer (for example, a senior living on a fixed income). what’s more, 80% of households struggling to make ends meet in nyc have at least one working adult, a reflection of the extreme unaffordability of our city. we know from previous crises that it can take years for food security levels in new york city to recover following a disaster, and we expect the need to remain high for several years. ana, a community member who visits city harvest’s prince hall mobile market in manhattan: “i go to the grocery store and i almost cry because everything is so expensive, especially the eggs, the meat, everything. i know how to manage my money. i don’t buy expensive clothes, but i’d rather pay my bills than buy food. [city harvest] has helped me a lot. i’m very grateful.” denise, a community member who visits city harvest’s stapleton mobile market on staten island: “i look at my pantry at home and i don’t have onions, potatoes, sweet potatoes. there’s no way to adjust to it. you have to, because you need to eat, but [prices are] just so much higher. i just take it as it comes what else can you do?”

for immediate release new poll: amid affordability crisis, more new yorkers struggling with rising food prices and cutting back on healthy foods 85% of new yorkers report the cost of food was outpacing their income, with parents of school children and rural households hurting the most roughly half of new yorkers now purchase less or no nutritious foods like fresh produce and proteins because of rising prices new york, ny as new yorkers grapple with an affordability crisis, rising food prices are adding to their cost of living according to a new poll commissioned by no kid hungry new york. 85 percent of new yorkers reported that the cost of food was rising faster than their income. as a result, nearly 4 in 5 households said it had become harder to afford groceries over the past 12 months the highest percentage tracked yet in their annual poll. those challenges are affecting how much new yorkers buy and what foods they choose. just under half of new yorkers (43%) reported a sign of food insecurity due to rising prices like eating less nutritious food or not having enough to eat. roughly half of new yorkers said they now purchase less or no fresh produce and proteins like meat because of their cost. those figures are significantly higher for parents of school age children and households in rural areas. “affordability is about more than just the rent. for millions of our neighbors especially families with kids the affordability crisis is a painful reality every time they get in the grocery checkout line. our poll shows rising food prices are outpacing families’ incomes in every part of the state. and because of it, new yorkers are facing hunger, being forced to purchase less healthy food and becoming increasingly stressed about their ability to make ends meet,” said rachel sabella, director of no kid hungry new york. “new yorkers are more united than ever in saying they want bipartisan action to end child hunger.” the poll was conducted by change research between march 16 and 20 and surveyed 1,673 new yorkers across the state and has a margin of error of +/  3.3%. read the poll summary here: https://state.nokidhungry.org/new york/wp content/uploads/sites/16/2024/04/no kid hungry ny_poll results spring 2024.pdf . statewide takeaways: new york city takeaways: one new york city parents responded that if she had more resources for groceries, “i would buy fresh produce, fresh fish, and fresh meat all the time, much more often than i possibly can now. our family would actually be able to have 3 healthy meals a day instead of 2 meals of whatever we are able to afford or get from friends.” eastern upstate takeaways (ex: capitol district, mohawk valley, north country) : a mom from upstate responded that if she had more resources for groceries, she would use it for: “more fruits and vegetables, my kids would have healthier snacks for school and i’d be able to put some of the money that now goes to the increased groceries to my mortgage, electric, student loans, and my kids could participate in activities outside of school.” western upstate takeaways (ex: buffalo area, genesee valley, southern tier): a western new york parent responded in the survey to underscore the importance of school meals: “i know the school meals are nutritious for my child. we receive free meals so it’s one less thing i need to worry about in a budget and i do not have to worry if my child will go hungry or not.” long island takeaways: a young mom on long island responded that if she had more resources for groceries, “my infant would never run out of formula and i wouldn’t worry how to get more until a paycheck comes in.” about no kid hungry no child should go hungry in america. but millions of kids could face hunger this year. no kid hungry is working to end childhood hunger by helping launch and improve programs that give all kids the healthy food they need to thrive. this is a problem we know how to solve. no kid hungry is a campaign of share our strength, an organization committed to ending hunger and poverty. join us at nokidhungry.org. about change research change research was founded in 2017 and immediately challenged the status quo in political research, making high quality public opinion data more accessible to forward thinking organizations and candidates. change research’s revolutionary methodology, dynamic online sampling, meets people where they are and delivers a representative sample of everyday people, unlocking an ability to reach many people who are hard to reach and who are traditionally underrepresented in polling. change research has conducted more than 3,000 polls in all 50 states, surveying over 4 million people throughout the us. today, change research continues its founding legacy of challenging the status quo in public opinion research, and in 2023, launched an integrated suite of research offerings, all of which employ fresh methods, can be deployed quickly, and cost a fraction of what competitors charge. ### © 2022 share our strength

on april 21, the united nations projected that because of covid 19, the number of people facing severe food insecurity worldwide could double to 265 million. the same week, in the united states, the five week total of job losses rose to a staggering 26 million, pushing millions more into food insecurity. amid uncertainty and confusion at the onset of the pandemic, the csis global food security program responds to some of the most critical, and frequently asked, questions about food security and safety. updated april 24, 2020 are we facing a global food crisis? at the beginning of 2020, 135 million people around the world were already facing extreme hunger. according to the world food program, that figure could rise to a staggering 265 million people by the end of this year. in remarks delivered to the un security council on april 21, un world food programme executive director david beasley said, “in a worst case scenario, we could be looking at famine in about three dozen countries.” yet it is not just the emerging economic catastrophe stemming from the covid 19 pandemic that could well give rise to a global food crisis. many of the most vulnerable parts of the world are concurrently struggling with other threats to food insecurity: protracted conflicts, recurrent droughts, and the worst locust infestation in decades. are we at risk of food shortages or price spikes? at this point, global food prices are stable. in march 2020, the food price index calculated by the un’s food and agriculture organization (fao) showed that, despite surges in “panic buying” among consumers in many countries, global prices actually dropped 4.3 percent from february 2020. this was largely a result of covid 19 related demand contractions amid lockdowns and quarantines. likewise, global food supplies are adequate. for instance, the fao’s estimate for global cereal production in 2019 is 2.3 percent higher than cereal production levels in 2018. in the united states, agriculture secretary sonny purdue confirmed food supplies are plentiful during a coronavirus task force press briefing in mid april. that said, we still don’t know what the medium  and long term impacts of covid 19 will be on global food security. for now, there are several near term dynamics to keep in mind. the first relates to food export restrictions. as of april 24, 14 countries had food export bans in place for 20 different products. this could be worrisome; in 2007, such trade restrictions were a major contributor to the doubling of world food prices. analysts have made it very clear that, given ample global food supplies, export bans are the wrong way for governments to cope with economic uncertainty stemming from the pandemic. (countries are taking many other measures to assist the vulnerable right now more on that here.) the good news is that food export bans have not increased substantially in recent weeks. second, the pandemic will impact global food security both directly and indirectly. as the committee on world food security’s high level panel of experts on food security and nutrition explained recently, the crisis is “already affecting food systems directly through impacts on food supply and demand, and indirectly but just as importantly through decreases in purchasing power, the capacity to produce and distribute food, and the intensification of care tasks, all of which will have differentiated impacts and will more strongly affect the poor and vulnerable.” finally, local food price shocks may be present even in the absence of global food price increases. for example, world food program’s market monitor reports that, in q1 of 2020, some 15 countries saw the cost of a basic basket of food increase severely (more than 10 percent). are we seeing any bottlenecks in the u.s. food supply chain? yes: slaughterhouses. for example, according to the new york times, about 50 cattle slaughterhouses account for around 98 percent of all slaughtering and processing in the united states. “shutting down one plant, even for a few weeks, is like closing an airport hub,” write the journalists michael corkery and david yaffe bellany. “it backs up hog and beef production across the country, crushes prices paid to farmers and eventually leads to months of meat shortages.” as of april 22, an estimated 13 major meatpacking facilities had shuttered their operations on account of coronavirus infections among workers. according to reporting from bloomberg, the plants account for fully one quarter of the united states’ hog slaughtering capacity. meat shortages are expected two weeks from now, according to this reporting. clearly, this is bad news for hog farmers: prices for pigs are plummeting, as there are more pigs than can be currently processed. how is the covid 19 pandemic affecting farmers? in many ways at once. for example, the u.s. agricultural system is facing severe labor challenges. according to the american farm bureau, among farmers’ and ranchers’ biggest covid 19 related concerns is the availability of farm labor, since much of it is sourced through the h 2a visa program that was temporarily suspended in response to the covid 19 pandemic. in late march, the u.s. state department moved to ease the h 2a restrictions. (labor constraints could lead to lower supply of, and thus higher prices for, farm inputs like fertilizer, seeds, and animal feed, all of which would eat away at farmers’ bottom lines.) on april 17, the u.s. department of agriculture (usda) announced the coronavirus food assistance program (cfap). the two major elements of the program include $16 billion of direct support for farmers and ranchers, and procurement by usda of $3 billion in fresh produce, dairy, and meat originally destined for outlets like restaurants that have temporarily or permanently closed. the outlook for farmers in low  and middle income countries where agriculture accounts for a greater share of gdp, relative to wealthier countries is worse. as a recent piece from the agricultural market information system points out, agriculture in these countries is labor intensive, so quarantine measures, self isolation, and aversion behavior in response to an outbreak “would therefore cut the [labor] supply, potentially resulting in acreage contractions, limiting crop management and ultimately curbing harvests.” moreover, “. . . low reserves of food staples, a common characteristic of low income countries and households, limit the ability to modulate food supplies in instances of production shocks and interruptions to trade, extenuating vulnerabilities.” why are farmers being forced to destroy their harvests? farmers of all sizes across the united states from dairy farmers in wisconsin to green bean farmers in florida have been forced to destroy harvests amid a severe drop off in demand stemming from the closures of restaurants, schools, hotels, and other food service outlets. the amount of food waste is catastrophic. according to reporting on the topic from the new york times, “the nation’s largest dairy cooperative, dairy farmers of america, estimates that farmers are dumping as many as 3.7 million gallons of milk each day. a single chicken processor is smashing 750,000 unhatched eggs every week.” the issue is not supply itself but “matching that supply with demand and getting it to where it’s needed most,” as the guardian put it. in its article, a texas food bank ceo explains, “the reality is what makes the food chain work normally is there are just tens of thousands of arrangements that have been developed over time in order to match supply and demand. then you just suddenly break all that and you’re trying to, with voluntary relationships, piece something together in a very short timeframe,” he said. “there’s going to be a lot of failure.” to learn more about u.s. food supply chain dynamics amid the covid 19 pandemic, see this piece from civil eats. are u.s. food workers vulnerable? yes, exceedingly so. many jobs in the u.s. food system have long been considered difficult, owing to occupational hazards like tough working conditions, low pay, and unpaid sick leave. but the covid 19 pandemic has made some of these jobs deadly. to date, the crisis has claimed the lives of at least 40 u.s. grocery store workers while infecting thousands of meatpackers and at least 100 usda inspectors. the federal relief bill passed in late march, which provided up to $23.5 billion for the agricultural industry, does not, according to reporting from the atlantic, include funding for worker protections like personal protective equipment, hazard pay, or paid sick leave. the number of food insecure people continues to grow as unemployment soars nationwide. how can i help? there are a number of organizations working tirelessly through the covid 19 outbreak to help meet the needs of the most vulnerable. however, these vital resources are becoming limited as unemployment soars, diagnoses rise, and financial assistance dwindles. in new york city alone, the epicenter of the covid 19 epidemic in the united states, reported nearly 40 percent of its food pantries and soup bank network have had to close. if you have resources to contribute to the covid 19 response, consider making a financial donation to a food bank. for food banks, cash goes farther than food donations. and please consider buying only what you need at the grocery store so that others in the community can access supplies they need. official guidance encourages households to procure food supplies for two week periods, but this poses extreme challenges for many families. moreover, studies find that those who live in lower income communities are more vulnerable to chronic health conditions the same conditions that can make the coronavirus up to 10 times more deadly. in order to help snap/wic beneficiaries, are there any foods i should avoid purchasing? to help those who receive women, infants, and children (wic) benefits, try your best to avoid purchasing food items that have the “wic” label on the price tag. for a full list of foods that can be purchased, check the usda website or your state wic website. if avoiding the wic labeled item is not possible, then avoid buying that item in large quantities. and keep in mind, some food items that qualify for wic purchases are unlabeled. for what period of time should i stock my pantry? two weeks, according to guidance from the cdc. this is consistent with advice from experts at johns hopkins university as well as with general advice on emergency preparedness from the federal emergency management agency. although “pantry loading” for items like dried beans, powdered milk, and canned meat is on the rise in light of covid 19 concerns, the good news is that grocery store supply chains remain intact. grocers have reassured u.s. consumers that their inventories are adequate to meet the surging demand. “for the long term, h e b is in a good in stock position on many of the items our customers need, and we are working around the clock to restock our shelves,” the company said in a statement recently. grocery stores are handling the uptick in demand in a number of ways. h e b and wegmans are limiting purchases on popular items like bread, eggs, and milk. kroger is hiring more workers. walmart is reducing its hours to allow for consistent restocking. whole foods is temporarily closing its hot bars, salad bars, soup bars, and self serve pizza stations. however, consumers still have an important role to play in self policing their purchasing. many food banks across the nation are experiencing an increase in demand as donations from retailers dwindle due in large part to sweeping panic buying. as caitlin welsh, director of the global food security program, told the guardian, “the supply chain is strong,” but the number of food insecure people is continuously increasing. as covid 19 continues to fuel an increase in unemployment, sticking to the cdc’s guidance of a two week supply is not just about easing grocery store pains, but about keeping more vulnerable neighbors well nourished. what are some tips for stocking my pantry on a budget? for many americans, the coronavirus is leading to smaller paychecks as retail and service industry employers temporarily shut their doors. but we all have to eat healthily despite tight budgets. here are eight practical ways to stretch your dollars at the grocery store. what are some safe ways to shop for groceries right now? in order to stay safe at the grocery store, experts recommend following these tips if you are getting your groceries delivered, here are some tips to stay safe: should i handle foods differently once i get them home? although it is possible for a person to contract coronavirus from touching an infected surface or object and then touching their face, this is not the main source of infection, and there is currently no evidence that supports the idea that the virus can be spread through food or food packaging. therefore, experts have not specifically recommended chemically disinfecting all your groceries after bringing them home. it is more important to wash your hands before and after handling your groceries, and wipe down your countertops. most coronavirus infections originate with the respiratory system, not the digestive system, so food itself is not a principal concern, according to the infectious disease expert daniel kuritzke. in fact, experts caution against washing fresh fruits and vegetables with soap and water as it can lead to ingesting soap residue, resulting in sickness. it is better to rinse your produce with only cold water. furthermore, freezing your foods will not kill the coronavirus and simply help the virus survive longer. if you’re concerned about any particular items, then throw away the packaging, remove the food, and wash your hands. for further best practices when preparing and handling food, follow the food and drug administration’s (fda) four food safety steps: clean, separate, cook, and chill. are there particular foods i should avoid purchasing, like foods imported from certain countries? the good news is that, at the time of publication, the fda reports “no evidence to support transmission of covid 19 associated with imported goods and there are no reported cases of covid 19 in the united states associated with imported goods.” authorities have not recommended avoiding foods from any particular countries. if you cannot avoid buying perishable foods, then it is best to default to the aforementioned four steps for food safety from the fda: clean, separate, cook, and chill. however, you may consider avoiding perishable imports. russ webster, president of food enterprise solutions, an international food safety firm, told csis, “in general, the more perishable the food, the more complex and thus susceptible is its supply chain.” shelf stable alternatives to perishable imports are fruits, vegetables, and meats that are canned, dried, frozen, or preserved. what food should i eat to help boost my immune system? although there is no way to fully prevent illness in the case of exposure to the coronavirus, there are steps you can take that may boost your body's immune system. the best fortification for a well functioning immune system is a balanced, healthy lifestyle. eating a diet high in fruits and vegetables and getting enough quality sleep helps safeguard your system against infection and disease. there is no “quick fix” for boosting your immune system, but nutrition is crucial for immune defense and resistance to pathogens. disruptions to nutritional status can impede immune response and lead to increased susceptibility to infection during nutrient deficiency. studies suggest that five core micronutrients vitamin b6, vitamin c, vitamin e, magnesium, and zinc play roles in maintaining immune function. the best way to get vitamins and minerals is from a well rounded diet, with plenty of fruits and vegetables (fresh or frozen are fine), legumes, whole grains, and lean sources of protein, along with healthy fats, such as nuts and olive oil. is it okay to order delivery and takeout food? in many areas across the country, restaurants and bars have been ordered to close to patrons, but some offer takeout and delivery options. private companies, like uber eats, have waived delivery fees for small, independent food businesses and have modified their drop off interactions to keep their customers safe a vital step in supporting access to food for people who can’t cook for themselves due to disability or illness. furthermore, announced in a presidential press conference on march 17, large fast food companies are keeping their driveway and delivery services operational. regardless of whether or not your home base is on lockdown, you should be avoiding public spaces and maintaining six feet between you and anyone not in your household while picking up takeout or purchasing groceries. should i invite my friends or neighbors over for dinner right now? no. how will recent legislation help improve food security? the u.s. government has passed and signed into law four different covid 19 relief packages. i am a public official. where can i get guidance on food and nutrition for my community during the coronavirus pandemic? below is a roundup of guidance from across the federal government: for state by state information in snap, wic, and the child nutrition program, see: the global food security program would also like to thank sydney smith for her work and contributions to this page. center for strategic and international studies 1616 rhode island avenue, nw washington, dc 20036 tel: 202.887.0200 fax: 202.775.3199 see media page for more interview, contact, and citation details. ©2025 center for strategic & international studies. all rights reserved.

new york city has a poverty rate of almost twice the national average   new york city had a poverty rate of 23% in 2022, where the nation overall poverty rate was only 12%. according to the nyc mayor’s office of food policy annual 2022 food metrics annual report, an estimated 1.2 million (14.6%) new york city residents were food insecure. the federal poverty line is the estimate of the price of a minimum food diet for a given family size, multiplied by three. this measure is exactly the same across the country   in 2024 a family of four is counted as living in poverty if their income is below $31,200, regardless of if they live in manhattan or in a rural area. in reality, costs vary dramatically across the country, and even within the city. when we use a measure of “true cost of living” (that accounts for different rent and food costs across the city, and includes other basic needs like medical and childcare) a total of half of households in new york city are earning below their true cost of living. even using the national poverty measure, which doesn’t account for the high cost of living in nyc, new york city has a higher poverty rate than the nation at large in four boroughs: apr 2024 1,786,494 people 20% of nyc residents apr 2024 511 locations 428 food pantries / 79 soup kitchens (some locations are both!) download the data data team home learn more about the hearing the ntas with the highest food insecurity are: the ntas with the lowest food insecurity are: in new york city, snap is used at different rates in different parts of the city. explore the map below featuring data from april 2024 to see where snap is most heavily used and how that has changed over the past year in the following map we have divided the city in to 4 categories: the bright red areas show where there are many food insecure people, and yet there are a smaller number of cfc locations per person in need. while this is a useful measure of where support is needed it doesn’t account for many important things, including: how often a location is open, how many people each location is able to serve, how close the locations are to where people live, etc. for more data research & visualizations on food insecurity and food access in new york city, visit the feed nyc dashboard. learn more for feedback, comments, and questions please email datainfo@council.nyc.gov. created by the nyc council data team we're located at new york city hall. council members each have an office at 250 broadway, as well as offices in each of their districts. you can reach us via social media, email, paper mail, or at your district office. for issues specific to a neighborhood, it's best to contact the council member representing that community. have questions, comments or feedback? email us here. for media inquiries, please contact press@council.nyc.gov read our accessibility statement error: contact form not found.

it appears that your web browser does not support javascript, or you have temporarily disabled scripting. this google™ translation feature is provided for informational purposes only. the new york state office of the state comptroller's website is provided in english. however, the "google translate" option may help you to read it in other languages. google translate™ cannot translate all types of documents, and it may not give you an exact translation all the time. if you rely on information obtained from google translate™, you do so at your own risk. the office of the state comptroller does not warrant, promise, assure or guarantee the accuracy of the translations provided. the state of new york, its officers, employees, and/or agents are not liable to you, or to third parties, for damages or losses of any kind arising out of, or in connection with, the use or performance of such information. these include, but are not limited to: because google translate™ is intellectual property owned by google inc., you must use google translate™ in accord with the google license agreement, which includes potential liability for misuse: google terms of service. office of the new york state comptroller nys comptroller thomas p. dinapoli get to knownew york state comptrollerthomas p. dinapoli read bio get to knownew york state comptrollerthomas p. dinapoli approximately one in ten, or about 800,000, new york households experienced food insecurity at some point between 2019 21, according to a report from state comptroller thomas p. dinapoli. the report found that the number of households facing food insecurity declined during the covid 19 pandemic due to federal relief programs and the expansion of federal food assistance programs. dinapoli raised the concern that food insecurity may grow as federal benefits lapse. notably, additional supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap) benefits expire on march 1. this is the second report from dinapoli’s office examining issues impacting new yorkers in need. his first report examined poverty trends. “federal aid helped new yorkers put food on the table during the pandemic, but some relief programs are ending as inflation and other pressures are pushing household budgets to their limit,” dinapoli said. “with all the challenges people are facing during these difficult times, we should ensure new yorkers don’t go hungry. our nation’s nutrition programs should be expanded to help those who are struggling to feed themselves and their families.” a household suffers from food insecurity when it cannot, at times, access adequate food for everyone in the home due to a lack of resources, according to the u.s. department of agriculture (usda). the usda reported 32.1% of households with annual incomes below the official poverty line were food insecure in 2021. national rates of food insecurity were highest for households headed by single mothers at 24.3%, as well as households headed by african americans (19.8%) and hispanics (16.2%) in 2021. for the 2019 2021 period, new york’s rate of food insecurity was 10.3%, slightly lower than the u.s. average of 10.4%. new york’s rate of food insecurity is 4.1 percentage points lower than the peak of 14.4% reported in the 2012 2014 period. food insecurity in new york, and nationally, continued trending downward even through the covid pandemic due to federal policy actions. these actions enhanced income   including three rounds of economic impact payments and the temporary expansion of the child tax credit in 2021   and increased assistance available through federal nutrition programs, including snap and the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants and children (wic). however, dinapoli warns this downward trend may be abating as federal relief programs lapse and food prices continue to rise. overall food prices are significantly higher since spring 2021, increasing 10.4% nationally and 8.6% in the new york newark jersey city area from december 2021 to december 2022. u.s. census survey data indicate a growing number of new yorkers are reporting they sometimes or often did not have enough food to eat (“food insufficiency”). in the summer of 2021, 7.3% of new yorkers reported food insufficiency, with higher rates in households with children. by november 2022, food insufficiency grew to 10.8% of new yorkers and rates for households with children increased to 13.4%. over the last two years, black and hispanic or latino adult new yorkers were more likely to report food insufficiency than both white adult new yorkers and adult new yorkers overall. from 2021 to 2022 (through november) the percentage of adults experiencing food insufficiency increased from 21% to 22.7% for hispanic or latino new yorkers, and 17.2% to 21.9% for african american new yorkers. dinapoli's report recommends: “food insecurity exacerbated by the pandemic has long plagued communities and households across new york state,” said state sen. roxanne j. persaud, 19th district. “state comptroller dinapoli’s report is a timely one: federal assistance has slowed to pre pandemic levels; food prices have risen and new yorkers are still struggling to get by despite significant economic recovery.” "access to quality foods, like fresh fruits and vegetables, is critical for everyone's health and well being,” said state sen. rachel may, 48th district. “so, it’s concerning to see state comptroller dinapoli’s report showing many new yorkers are going without adequate food. this problem is especially prevalent in communities like syracuse and auburn, where many residents live in food deserts and without access to grocery stores. with our partners in the federal government, we must work at the state level to build upon current programs, broaden our outreach to additional communities and get creative about how we tackle the pressing problem of food insecurity.” "food insecurity has existed in my district for many years and was only exacerbated by the covid 19 pandemic,” said assemblywoman catalina cruz, 39th district. “as we were the epicenter of the pandemic, i have seen firsthand how food insecurity devastated not only my community but upstate communities as well. in response, i introduced the nourish ny act in this state assembly, which has connected farmers and agricultural producers with food relief organizations for our friends and neighbors in need. i want to thank state comptroller dinapoli for highlighting food insecurity in his latest report and urging an expansion of programs and look forward to working closely with his team on this issue in the future.” “state comptroller dinapoli’s statement 'we should ensure new yorkers don’t go hungry' is both a summary of the issue as well as a call to action,” said united way of new york state president hugh parry. "nutrition programs are ending, and food prices are increasing which combine to endanger the vulnerable, both old and young. united way of new york state commends the recommendations state comptroller dinapoli advances to address food insecurity. the system of united ways throughout new york will continue their work at the community level to address hunger while the information and referral network, accessed by dialing the three digit number 211, will direct people to help.” "food insecurity knows no bounds, whether someone lives in new york city or in remote rural areas of our state. it's imperative we have a strong food system that widens access to fresh, local food. this includes continued support for the nourish ny and the hpnap programs that benefit people in need and the state's family farms. new york farm bureau thanks state comptroller dinapoli for highlighting the issue and his support for new york agriculture," said david fisher, new york farm bureau president. “as the regional food bank for long island, we see how many families, seniors, and children struggle with food insecurity on a daily basis,” said paule t. pachter, president & ceo of long island cares   the harry chapin regional food bank. “we applaud state comptroller dinapoli for focusing on the issues of poverty and hunger and publishing a series of reports and recommendations that new york state can implement to reduce food insecurity. we join with state comptroller dinapoli in calling attention to several proposals in congress that seek to reduce support for vital programs such as snap, wic and other services that can result in lifting people out of the cycle of poverty and food insecurity. while the number of new yorkers in need of emergency food assistance has gone down in recent months, the cost of living, inflation, and the cost of the average market basket are impacting many families and will undoubtedly result in an increase in need, which is why the recommendations provided by the state comptroller need to be a priority for our elected officials to address.” “since the start of the pandemic, catholic charities has been on the front lines of feeding hungry new yorkers, providing nearly 11 million meals at our food pantries, community kitchens and pop up neighborhood food pantries," said executive director of catholic charities of the archdiocese of new york, monsignor kevin sullivan. “food insecurity is a challenge that affects every community, and impacts families’ ability to meet other necessary expenses such as rent and utilities. catholic charities is committed to working for solutions that can increase access to food for new yorkers in need.” “we have witnessed the positive impact upon rural families, especially children, when we have taken vital steps to ensure food sufficiency,” said the rev. richard witt, executive director, rural migrant ministry. “i stand with state comptroller dinapoli and his call for the expansion of vital federal programs to help families put food on the table. it is important to not only ensure the well being of our neighbor from a faith perspective, but it also it makes practical sense with regards to productivity, safety, and economic development. we need to commit to the continuation of these programs that benefit our brothers and sisters. it is the right thing to do.” “this report underscores the importance of strong federal nutrition programs to ensure households across new york have access to enough healthy food,” said julia tedesco, president & ceo of foodlink. “although the numbers reflected in this report are startlingly high already, we know that in the rochester region, our network of food pantries and meal programs are seeing a 30% increase in 2023 due to the expiration of some federal benefits and the impact of inflation. we support state comptroller dinapoli’s policy recommendations so that we can help millions of new yorkers who, too often, skip meals to help make ends meet.” "as an organization that has fought hunger for over 40 years, we at city harvest know far too well that food insecurity is an issue that has challenged millions of new yorkers in ways that are not fully reflected by traditional economic indicators such as poverty and unemployment,” said jilly stephen, ceo, city harvest. “the underlying conditions of food insecurity disproportionately impact the most vulnerable populations in new york, especially people of color, immigrants, and households with children. we thank the state comptroller for focusing on these challenges and look forward to continuing our work with leaders in albany to ensure that we embrace public policy solutions to end hunger and its underlying causes." “state comptroller dinapoli rightly calls for increasing participation in snap and other programs,” said aarp new york state director beth finkel. “aarp new york is calling on the governor to require ‘data matching’ between the department of health and the office of temporary and disability assistance to help ensure new yorkers enrolled in some benefits programs are automatically enrolled in others for which they qualify, including snap, utility and energy assistance programs and the newly expanded medicare savings program (msp). increasing enrollment in msp could offset the expiration of pandemic snap benefits by reducing qualifying medicare beneficiaries’ premiums and prescription drug costs by over $7,000 a year each on average   while data matching would drive an additional $2.5 billion in federal assistance to new yorkers.” “food hardship is too widespread even during the best of times, and is a particular concern now, as federal pandemic relief winds down while food prices are increasing, and new york’s economy is still recovering. according to our own poverty tracker report, nearly 40% of new york city families with children experience some form of food insecurity," said richard r. buery jr., ceo of robin hood, new york city's largest local poverty fighting philanthropy. "state comptroller dinapoli's food insecurity report underscores how vulnerable low income new yorkers continue to be and how urgent it is that albany and washington prioritize expanding and making permanent, pandemic era tax credit programs and raise eligibility levels for supplemental food programs like snap, wic and nourish new york so low income new yorkers can keep food on their tables." “fpwa applauds the recommendations put forth by state comptroller dinapoli,” said jennifer jones austin, ceo and executive director, fpwa. “as we seek to ensure our neighbors and community members have access to the food they need to nourish themselves and their families, improving access and eliminating barriers to food security programs is critical. this report underscores the importance of fundamentally shifting the way we operate new york's social safety net programs, an issue fpwa's recent work calls attention to. as mentioned in our report, the gaps in the cash assistance program severely restrict access and prevent those receiving it from affording even their basic needs such as food. while we advocate for better income support programs it is also crucial that we never lose sight of the long term goal of dismantling the structural forces that keep millions in poverty. this starts with ending the use of outdated poverty measures that undercount the number of people experiencing economic need and instead accurately measure the true cost of living in our state and country. we stand with the comptroller’s office in these policy recommendations and look forward to working together to see them come to fruition.” report new yorkers in need: food insecurity and nutritional assistance programs other report in series new yorkers in need: a look at poverty trends in new york state for the last decade track state and local government spending at open book new york. under state comptroller dinapoli’s open data initiative, search millions of state and local government financial records, track state contracts, and find commonly requested data. × tell us more about you to receive content related to your area or interests.

it appears that your web browser does not support javascript, or you have temporarily disabled scripting. this google™ translation feature is provided for informational purposes only. the new york state office of the state comptroller's website is provided in english. however, the "google translate" option may help you to read it in other languages. google translate™ cannot translate all types of documents, and it may not give you an exact translation all the time. if you rely on information obtained from google translate™, you do so at your own risk. the office of the state comptroller does not warrant, promise, assure or guarantee the accuracy of the translations provided. the state of new york, its officers, employees, and/or agents are not liable to you, or to third parties, for damages or losses of any kind arising out of, or in connection with, the use or performance of such information. these include, but are not limited to: because google translate™ is intellectual property owned by google inc., you must use google translate™ in accord with the google license agreement, which includes potential liability for misuse: google terms of service. office of the new york state comptroller nys comptroller thomas p. dinapoli get to knownew york state comptrollerthomas p. dinapoli read bio get to knownew york state comptrollerthomas p. dinapoli new yorkers in need food insecurity and nutritional assistance programs march 2023 report prepared by the office of budget policy and analysis new yorkers in need food insecurity and nutritional assistance programs march 2023 share: download pdf report download pdf report share: millions of new yorkers face daily challenges as a result of living at or near the federal poverty level, resulting in painful choices related to basic needs such as shelter, health care, food and transportation. often, the result is hunger or food insecurity, which is uncertainty or inability to get enough food because of a lack of resources. the consequences can be devastating, from increased incidence of chronic disease and other health effects to reduced academic performance to an inability to succeed at the workplace. over time, federal policy actions bolstered by state and philanthropic efforts have contributed to improvements in the rate of food insecurity. reflecting improving economic conditions and supported by the federal supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap) and other efforts, the rate of food insecurity in new york declined by over 16 percent between 2008 2010 and 2017 2019. and despite the economic disruptions of covid, federal and state policy actions reduced food insecurity by nearly 5 percent more from 2017 19 to 2019 2021. while that progress is encouraging, roughly one in ten   or about 800,000   households in new york continue to suffer from food insecurity. more recently, rising food costs have placed additional pressure on household budgets just as pandemic era relief programs have lapsed. this report is the second in the “new yorkers in need” series. it details recent trends in food insecurity, explains policy interventions by the federal and state governments, and demonstrates a clear need for a continuing commitment to reduce the incidence of food insecurity. while income is a critical factor in determining food insecurity, there are many other challenges that can present barriers to accessing healthy food. federal and state leaders must make efforts to address these challenges to continue to make progress in reducing food insecurity and improve the lives and productivity of millions of new yorkers. thomas p. dinapolistate comptroller the u.s. department of agriculture (usda) defines food insecurity as inability at times to acquire adequate food for one or more household members due to a lack of resources. research indicates food insecurity can affect health and mental health outcomes, academic performance, and workforce productivity. during the three year period of 2019 21, approximately one in ten (or about 800,000) new york households experienced food insecurity, 4.1 percentage points lower than the peak of 14.4 percent recorded in the 2012 2014 period. food insecurity in new york and nationwide has continued trending downward even through the covid pandemic due to temporary pandemic relief programs that enhanced income, such as economic impact payments and expansion of the federal child tax credit, and others that increased assistance available through federal nutrition programs. in addition, the state expanded its funding for food programs through initiatives such as the nourish new york program. read the first report of this series about the pandemic's impact on the state's poverty rates. new yorkers in need: a look at poverty trends in new york state for the last decade however, food insecurity may once again be on the rise, as pandemic income supports have lapsed and food prices have experienced rapid inflationary increases. census survey data indicate growing numbers of new yorkers are reporting they do not have enough food to eat (“food insufficiency”). in the summer of 2021, 7.3 percent of new yorkers reported food insufficiency; by november 2022, that rate grew to 10.8 percent of new yorkers. rates for households with children increased to 13.4 percent. as of december 2022, nearly 2.9 million new york households were enrolled in the supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the nation’s largest domestic food and nutrition program. federal legislation authorized the issuance of emergency allotments of supplemental snap benefits to households not receiving the maximum benefit for the household’s size, but these benefits will cease beginning on march 1, 2023. increased benefits provided by the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants and children (wic) will cease starting october 2023. food insecurity could grow further when these allotments end, and when other temporary flexibilities and program expansions that have supported many households during the pandemic expire. the report makes six recommendations: systematic or chronic lack of access to food is commonly referred to as hunger; however, government definitions center on the concepts of food security and insecurity. the u.s. department of agriculture (usda) defines food security as access by household members to enough food for an active, healthy life. it defines food insecurity as households unable at times to acquire adequate food for one or more household members because they had insufficient money and other resources for food.1 the usda’s food security statistics are collected by the u.s. census bureau in an annual supplement to the monthly current population survey.2 the 2021 food security supplement survey asked one adult respondent per household about experiences and behaviors that indicate food insecurity during calendar year 2021, such as being unable to afford balanced meals, cutting the size of meals, or being hungry because of too little money for food. the food security status of the household was assigned based on the number of food insecure conditions reported.3 the usda’s economic research service (ers) averages three calendar years of data in order to provide reliable state level statistics. in 2019 21, approximately one in ten (or about 800,000) new york households experienced food insecurity.4 this rate is 3.0 percentage points (or 22.6 percent) lower than it was 10 years ago and 4.1 percentage points (or 28.5 percent) lower than the peak of 14.4 recorded in the 2012 2014 survey period. continued economic growth following the great recession largely explains the downward trend over this time period. since 2014 2016, new york’s rates for food insecurity have been consistently lower than national rates, which declined steadily from a high of 14.7 in 2009 11 to 10.4 percent in 2019 21. in the 2019 21 period, new york’s rate of food insecurity was 10.3 percent, lower than 21 other states and barely lower than the u.s. average. source: usda ers food security is strongly associated with income. the usda’s most recent report (released in september 2022) showed 32.1 percent of households with annual incomes below the official poverty line were food insecure in 2021.5 the usda also reported 2021 national rates of food insecurity were significantly higher than the national average (10.2 percent) for households with children (12.5 percent); households headed by african americans (19.8 percent) and hispanics (16.2 percent); women (13.2 percent) and men (12.3 percent) living alone; and households headed by single mothers (24.3 percent) and single fathers (16.2 percent).6 even after the onset of the covid pandemic in early 2020, food insecurity in new york and nationwide continued trending downward. this resulted from a robust federal response to the pandemic, including through three rounds of economic impact payments and temporary expansion of the child tax credit in 2021, and policy changes to federal nutrition programs. however, food insecurity may once again be on the rise, as pandemic income supports have lapsed and food prices have experienced rapid inflationary increases. more recent data are self reported by individuals answering the household pulse survey, administered by the u.s. census bureau to measure household experiences during the pandemic. the pulse survey includes a question about food eaten in the household for the last seven days; respondents may answer that they have sufficient or insufficient food to eat (“food insufficiency”).7 in contrast to usda data on households, pulse estimates are self reported by individuals. as figures 2 and 3 indicate, self reported food insufficiency for new york households has risen since the summer of 2021, from a summer average of 7.3 percent to 10.8 percent by november 2022. rates for new york households with children are even higher, increasing to 13.4 percent by november 2022.8 nationwide rates are higher: 11 percent for all and 13.7 percent for households with children in november 2022. source: u.s. census bureau, household pulse survey source: u.s. census bureau, household pulse survey in new york, black and hispanic or latino adults were more likely to experience food insufficiency over the last two years. the percentage of adult hispanic or latino new yorkers experiencing food insufficiency increased from 21.0 percent in 2021 to 22.7 percent in 2022 (through november), while percentages of adult black new yorkers who sometimes or often lacked sufficient food increased from 17.2 to 21.9 percent. percentages of adult white new yorkers experiencing food insufficiency also increased from 2021 to 2022, but only from 5.3 to 6.4 percent. the percentage of all adult new yorkers experiencing food insufficiency increased from 10.5 percent in 2021 to 11.7 percent in 2022. the direct relief payments started in march 2020, with payments of up to $1,200 per adult for eligible individuals and $500 per qualifying child under age 17 provided by the coronavirus aid, relief, and economic security act (cares act). starting in december 2020, the tax relief act of 2020 authorized additional payments of up to $600 per adult for eligible individuals and up to $600 for each qualifying child under age 17. in march 2021, the american rescue plan act provided a third round of payments of up to $1,400 for eligible individuals or $2,800 for married couples filing jointly, plus $1,400 for each qualifying dependent. the american rescue plan also increased the amount of the federal child tax credit for 2021 from $2,000 to $3,600 for qualifying children under age 6, and to $3,000 for other qualifying children under age 18. eligible families received the full credit if they earned up to $150,000 for a married couple or $112,500 for families with a single parent. in addition, for the first time ever, the american rescue plan provided advanced monthly payments of the credit starting in late july through december 2021 that were worth up to one half of families’ estimated full annual credit amount. families receiving these payments could obtain their remaining federal child tax credit by filling out a tax return in 2022. the credit is not taxable; receiving it does not affect anyone’s eligibility for, or lower the amount of, other federal benefits. overall food prices   including the costs of “food at home” and “food away from home,” presented in consumer price index (cpi) summaries issued by the u.s. bureau of labor statistics   are significantly higher since the spring of 2021, increasing 10.4 percent nationally and 8.6 percent in the new york newark jersey city area from december 2021 to december 2022, eroding the purchasing power of families. “food at home” prices have risen 11.8 percent nationally and 10.1 percent in the new york newark jersey city area from december 2021 to december 2022, as shown in figure 4. in the new york newark jersey city area, price changes were largest for cereals and bakery products (16.0 percent), other food at home (12.6 percent), fruits and vegetables (11.3 percent), non alcoholic beverages (9.7 percent) and dairy products (9.4 percent). source: u.s. labor department bureau of labor statistics, consumer price index for all urban consumers, unadjusted indexes as a result of rising food costs, consumers have reduced their consumption of some foods and beverages more than others, according to an october 2022 report on food inflation by information resources, inc. (iri).9 as shown in figure 5, products with notable decreases in sales volume include frozen meals, deli foods, produce, and baking goods. despite very high price increases, dairy and bakery items, including essentials like milk and bread, have experienced the least decline in sales volume. source: iri®, october 2022 price check, tracking retail food and beverage inflation, november 1, 2022, available at https://www.iriworldwide.com/iri/media/library/iri october 2022 inflation check.pdf high prices are also prompting some households to seek charitable assistance. survey data published by long island cares, the regional food bank serving nassau and suffolk counties, indicate that approximately 40 percent of respondents worked at least part time and that more than half of respondents indicated they used food pantries due to the cost of food or inflation. almost 98 percent of respondents indicated the pantry improved their access to nutritious food.10 a recent new york health foundation survey stated 62 percent of food insecure individuals reported that transportation is a barrier to obtaining food. these challenges can be acute for those in rural areas or those who are disabled. almost 40 percent of food insecure new yorkers said they had to travel more than 20 minutes each way for food. reliance on public transportation often limited the number of items that could be brought home.11 in 2019, the usda’s food access research atlas identified food access concerns in many areas of the state, including in rural counties like chautauqua, franklin, lewis, steuben and st. lawrence, but also in or around urban areas.12 the usda uses distance from a supermarket or major grocer   half or one mile in an urban region and 10 or 20 miles in a rural area   as a measure for “food deserts” in low income areas. another challenge relates to access to assistance. according to the urban institute’s 2021 well being and basic needs survey, three in five food insecure adults who reported not using charitable food services were not aware of resources in their community, and about half of low income adults surveyed reported feeling uncomfortable seeking assistance if they had a need.13 at times, the barrier is not access to food, but access to nutritional food. at times of rising food prices, households may shift their purchases toward more affordable items while simultaneously reducing the nutritional quality of food. nutrition security is defined as “consistent access, availability, and affordability of foods and beverages that promote well being and prevent (and if needed, treat) disease.”14 nutrition security is less prevalent among traditionally marginalized minority groups, as well as people living in rural and lower income counties, who are more likely to experience disparities in nutrition quality, food insecurity, and corresponding diet related diseases such as obesity and type 2 diabetes.15 the health foundation survey underscored the connections between food and health; it found food insecure new yorkers are twice as likely to report poor or fair health as their food secure peers (48 percent compared with 23 percent), 21 percent delay or skip medical care, and 13 percent delay or do not purchase prescription medication.16 research shows the impact of hunger and diet related diseases on overall health, academic achievement, and financial security, as well as societal costs of reduced workforce productivity, weakened national security (one in four young adults cannot qualify for the military due to being overweight or obese), and increasing health care costs.17 hungry kids can have problems in school and socially, as they have higher rates of cognitive problems, aggression and anxiety. food insecurity in adults is correlated with increased rates of mental health problems, diabetes, hypertension, poor sleep and overall poor health.18 the federal centers for medicare & medicaid services has authorized state medicaid programs to test whether coverage of “food is medicine” interventions   including medically tailored meals and groceries, as well as produce prescriptions (fruit and vegetable prescriptions or vouchers provided by medical professionals for people with diet related diseases or food insecurity)   can effectively treat or prevent diet related health conditions and reduce food insecurity.19 as a result, a department of health (doh) pilot program recently allowed eight medicaid managed care plans to offer medically tailored meals as a covered benefit for adults living with severe mental illness in new york city and 13 upstate counties.20 the meals are tailored to the medical needs of the recipients by a registered dietitian nutritionist, and are intended to improve health outcomes, lower cost of care, and increase patient satisfaction, according to doh. safety net programs to increase food security and help reduce hunger are administered by federal, state and local governments, and supplemented by philanthropic efforts. the state of new york operates several food programs, with disbursements totaling $163 million in state fiscal year (sfy) 2021 22. (see appendix for details.) during the pandemic, the state launched two new notable programs: the restaurant resiliency program and the nourish new york program (nourish ny). in recognition of the impact of pandemic related closures on restaurants, the restaurant resiliency program was funded with $25 million to allow restaurants to work with regional food banks to serve distressed communities. nourish ny was created in 2020 to re route surplus agricultural products from new york farmers and dairy manufacturers who lost markets during the pandemic to new yorkers in need through the state’s food banks. in sfys 2021 22 and 2022 23, at least $108.1 million has been spent on nourish ny, including funding provided through the hunger prevention and nutrition assistance program (hpnap), which generally supports emergency food distribution.21 the broadest level of support comes from the federal government. the usda administers 15 federal nutrition assistance programs that serve one in four americans a year.22 the discussion below focuses on how pandemic era expansions and flexibilities to federal programs provided critical support to millions of new yorkers and made meaningful reductions in food insecurity. snap is the nation’s largest domestic food and nutrition assistance program for low income americans.23 research has linked snap to improved outcomes not just with respect to food security, but also to health more broadly, thereby resulting in lower health care costs in the long term.24 in most cases, snap benefits are intended to supplement a household’s food budget, not provide for all required meals in their entirety. gross monthly income eligibility limits are generally set at 130 percent of the poverty level for households with no elderly or disabled members (for example, $3,007 for a family of four without earned income).25 in 2019, the last year for which data are available, 89 percent of eligible new yorkers participated in snap; the national snap participation rate was 82 percent.26 until the pandemic, the number of new yorkers receiving snap benefits and the costs of their benefits had been decreasing, as shown in figure 6. between sfy 2019 2020 and sfy 2021 22, annual snap benefit costs grew from $4.3 billion to $8.4 billion. as of december 2022, nearly 2.9 million new york households were enrolled in snap. note: the number of beneficiaries for sfy 2022 23 is a 9 month average of usage from april through december 2022. all other beneficiary numbers reflect a 12 month average of usage by state fiscal year. source: usda much of the recent growth in the state’s snap spending reflects federal laws enacted in response to the pandemic that provided temporary increases to snap benefits: separate from implementation of the federal pandemic response laws, the usda took action to boost snap spending even further.28 the thrifty food plan, the diet used as the basis for the maximum snap benefit allotments, was updated, resulting in a 22.8 percent increase in snap’s maximum benefit allotments starting in october 2021.29 a further 12.5 percent increase was implemented on october 1, 2022 to reflect the impact of food inflation from june 2021 to june 2022. as a result, an eligible family of four in the 48 contiguous states and the district of columbia will receive $939 per month through september 2023.30 despite these recent increases, anti hunger advocates as well as certain elected officials assert snap benefits “fall short of the amounts needed for adequate diets.”31 research from the urban institute indicates the increase in maximum allotments helped close the gap between maximum snap benefits and meal costs for many, but not all, calculating that the new benefit levels continue to fall short in 21 percent of counties nationally (compared to 96 percent prior to the increase).32 the wic program, administered at the national and regional levels by the usda, and at the state level by the new york state department of health, is designed to “safeguard the health of low income pregnant, postpartum, and breastfeeding women, infants, and children up to age 5 who are at nutritional risk by providing nutritious foods to supplement diets, information on healthy eating including breastfeeding promotion and support, and referrals to health care.”33 pregnant, postpartum, and breastfeeding women, infants, and children up to age 5 who meet income eligibility (applicants’ gross income must be at or below 185 percent of the federal poverty level or $51,338 annually for a family of four) and state residency requirements are eligible for wic.34 applicants must also be determined to be at “nutrition risk” by a physician, nutritionist, nurse or other health professional, and wic covers nutritional foods and provides iron fortified formula for infants.35 like snap, pandemic related changes and flexibilities have increased wic program participation and benefit costs.36 in new york, as shown in figure 7, participation in the wic program has risen nearly 10 percent since april 2020 to 395,000 women, infants and children in september 2022, while food costs   the amount of money provided to local grocery stores and farmers markets when wic participants redeem their wic food package benefits   have been rising sharply since september 2021. according to preliminary figures, average monthly participation in the state’s wic program increased 5.1 percent to nearly 387,000 new yorkers in federal fiscal year (ffy) 2022, while federal food costs for the program totaled $302.1 million, an increase of $83.1 million or 39.8 percent over ffy 2021.37 in 2019, the last year for which data are available, 59 percent of eligible new yorkers participated in wic; the national wic participation rate was 57.4 percent.38 source: usda food and nutrition service, wic data tables, monthly data   state level participation by category and program costs the increase in wic food costs starting in october 2021 largely results from congressional action to increase wic’s fruit and vegetable benefit, but also reflects the overall increase in wic participation and higher food prices.39 the american rescue plan allowed new york and other states to increase wic benefits for purchase of fruits and vegetables and subsequent congressional action provided further increases.40 increased benefits will cease starting october 2023. typically, the largest usda child nutrition programs are the national school lunch program (nslp), the school breakfast program (sbp), and the child and adult care food program (cacfp).41 in ffys 2020 and 2021, the pandemic forced the closure of many schools and child and adult care centers, disrupting typical meal provision. in response, federal covid 19 waivers allowed the usda to expand the summer food service program (sfsp) and, starting in july 2021, the nslp’s and sbp’s seamless summer option (sso) began to provide free meals to students in all areas, regardless of income, throughout the year.42 as a result, meals served by the sfsp and the sso made up for much of the declines in meals served by other programs, as shown in figure 8. notes: data for the nslp and sbp include meals and the cost of meals served through the sso. data are subject to revision. source: usda food and nutrition service, child nutrition tables in addition, the pandemic electronic benefit transfer (p ebt) program was created as an option for states to provide a snap like benefit   when a school is closed five or more consecutive days   to households with children who would have received free or reduced price school meals if not for the closure.43 like snap, households can use p ebt benefits to purchase groceries at snap authorized retailers.44 from may 2020 through september 2022, otda (the state agency with federal approval to operate and administer new york’s plan for issuing p ebt food benefits) distributed $3.8 billion in benefits to eligible children.45 the success of the p ebt program was recently recognized with the recently enacted consolidated appropriations act of 2023 (the act), which created a permanent summer food program starting in 2024 that provides low income families with grocery benefits of $40 per eligible child per month, when schools are closed for the summer. the act also allows families in rural areas to have meals delivered instead of picking them up on site. however, the act reduces any summer food benefits issued to households to $120 per eligible child during the summer of 2023.46 standard summer food benefits for eligible children were $375 per child in 2021 and $391 per child in 2022. thanks in large part to federal policy responses, rates of food insecurity nationwide and in new york largely trended lower during the pandemic   that is, until food costs started rising last year and pandemic related income supports expired. as cited in the first report of the new yorkers in need series, economic impact payments and the enhancements to the federal child tax credit produced significant reductions in poverty. furthermore, recipients of the enhanced federal child tax credit also reported greater declines in food insecurity than non recipients, underscoring the interrelatedness of social safety net policies.47 now, as the federal government winds down temporary pandemic related nutrition benefits, food insecurity may grow. while the expiration of some pandemic relief programs may be appropriate, the federal child tax credit enhancements should be renewed so meaningful reductions in poverty can continue and help alleviate stress on household budgets. the white house has released a strategy on hunger, nutrition and health with a goal of cutting food insecurity in half and virtually eliminating the number of u.s. households experiencing hunger by 2030. among other things, the strategy calls for improving food access and affordability by taking steps to boost incomes, increasing funding for nutrition programs for older adults, preventing food loss and waste across the food supply chain, as well as strengthening federal assistance programs, including expanding p ebt and school meals programs and expanding snap eligibility to underserved populations. the white house strategy also calls for making changes to facilitate ease of access to benefits, like streamlining application processes; prioritizing nutrition, particularly in health prevention; and increasing historically underserved communities’ access to affordable and healthy foods. the strategy seeks to expand medicare and medicaid beneficiaries’ access to “food is medicine” interventions and provide universal screening for food insecurity in federal health care programs.48 recognizing the challenges facing people who live in communities without grocery stores or the ability to travel to nearby stores, the white house also plans to work with the national grocers association to expand full service grocery stores into usda designated food deserts.49 the usda recently announced plans to make nutritious food more accessible and affordable for consumers by increasing funding for “projects that demonstrate and evaluate the impacts of fresh produce prescriptions to increase fresh fruit and vegetable consumption, improve health, and reduce food insecurity” and by providing low income seniors with better access to locally grown fruits, vegetables, honey and herbs.50 these efforts should be supported. additional steps can be taken to avert a looming “hunger cliff” after temporary pandemic benefits expire. recent congressional action to create a permanent summer food program for eligible children starting in 2024 is a notable action in the effort to reduce food insecurity; however, ending snap emergency allotments and limiting existing summer food benefits for children, will be counterproductive, particularly if the period of high inflation continues. the federal government should extend temporary snap and wic nutrition benefits and flexibilities, at least until food inflation subsides. in addition, federal officials should also raise the eligibility levels for snap and wic to at least 200 percent of the federal poverty level. increasing the snap eligibility threshold could provide over 500,000 additional new york households with access to snap benefits and improve their continuity of benefits, costing approximately $2.7 billion in additional annual federal funding. increasing the wic eligibility threshold would provide over 10,000 additional new yorkers with access to wic benefits and cost approximately $13 million in additional annual federal funding. the state can also take meaningful action. doh and otda can conduct targeted outreach activities to increase participation in both wic and snap; doh currently manages a five year, $10 million contract for wic outreach services through september 2026, while otda manages a five year, $29.1 million contract for nutrition outreach and education through june 2025. doh and otda should also make it easier to apply and recertify for both programs, and local agencies should ensure timely processing of benefit applications. in new york city, the human resources administration timeliness rate for snap applications dropped to 60 percent in city fiscal year 2022, due to high application volume and staffing shortages.51 according to a recent ny health foundation survey of food insecure new yorkers, most supported a single, streamlined application for snap and wic, as well as continuation of remote eligibility interviews and recertification for the programs.52 while snap and wic provide broad support, assistance provided through state programs is also meaningful for new yorkers in need and should be sustained. although created as a pandemic relief program in 2020, nourish ny was codified in november 2021, and has served as a vehicle for purchasing at least 40 million pounds of food.53 the executive budget for sfy 2023 24 has proposed a $50 million appropriation for the program in sfy 2023 24. in recent years, nourish new york has also received funding from hpnap, and the executive budget has proposed $34.5 million for hpnap in sfy 2023 24. these programs should be continued. the prior legislative addition of $22 million for hpnap should also be considered for sfy 2023 24. finally, new york and the federal government should broaden services and supports for food insecure individuals and families. examples include: the state administers several other u.s. food programs, as well as several of its own nutrition initiatives, including those within the state office for the aging (sofa), the state education department (sed), the state health department (doh), empire state development (esd) and the state office of general services (ogs), as shown in figure 9. collectively, state disbursements on these programs totaled $163 million in state fiscal year (sfy) 2021 22; through november 2022, disbursements have totaled $82 million in sfy 2022 23. many of these initiatives are intended to extend the benefits provided by federal assistance and to amplify the efforts of private philanthropy. notes: the restaurant resiliency program was established in sfy 2022; no disbursements occurred prior to the end of that fiscal year. the negative disbursement amount for the hunger prevention and nutrition assistance program reflects transactions moving expenditures to other nutrition services programs and various federal funds. source: office of the state comptroller sofa title iii c nutrition services include congregate meals, home delivered meals, and nutrition screening, education and counseling. the wellness in nutrition program provides home delivered meals, shopping assistance, congregate meals, nutrition counseling and nutrition education, targeting low income new yorkers, those living alone and those over age 75. sofa’s nutrition services initiative provides congregate and home delivered meals to eligible participants who are 60 years old or older. according to sofa’s 2021 annual report, nearly 64,000 older new yorkers received home delivered meals and over 196,000 older new yorkers received meals in a congregate setting.54 nourish ny is intended to re route surplus agricultural products from new york farmers and dairy manufacturers who lost markets during the pandemic to new yorkers in need through the state’s food banks. in sfys 2021 22 and 2022 23, at least $108.1 million has been spent on nourish ny: $87.3 million as part of doh’s hunger prevention and nutrition assistance program (hpnap); and $20.9 million through separate doh funding for nourish ny.55 in particular, hpnap helps to fill gaps created by federal programs’ failure to adjust benefit levels to reflect new york state's higher costs for housing, utilities and food. hpnap provides resources to an estimated 2,500 emergency food relief organizations (efro) in new york. these efros include 10 regional food banks as well as food pantries, soup kitchens and emergency shelters. the restaurant resiliency program provides the state’s regional food banks with $25 million in funding to purchase meals from qualified restaurants and deliver the meals to food pantries, soup kitchens, and shelters. during sfy 2022, the program partnered with 279 restaurants to distribute over 1 million meals to people in need.56 through the temporary emergency feeding assistance program (tefap), ogs provides federal funding to food banks to cover the storage and distribution of usda foods.57 in addition, the governor recently announced that hellofresh, a german food company that has distributed 1 million meals to new york’s veterans, service members and their families, “has committed to funding the program through 2023 to help ensure continued access to fresh and healthy meals to new yorkers who have served and continue to serve.”58 1 the u.s. department of agriculture (usda) does not use the term “hunger” to describe households with food insecurity, referring instead to “resource constrained hunger” as “a potential consequence of food insecurity that, because of prolonged, involuntary lack of food, results in discomfort, illness, weakness, or pain that goes beyond the usual uneasy sensation." determinations of food security are high food security, marginal food security, low food security, and very low food security. see: usda economic research service, food security in the u.s. overview/measurement, october 17, 2022, available at https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food nutrition assistance/food security in the u s/measurement. 2 the 2021 food security supplement survey included over 30,000 households comprising a representative sample of the u.s. civilian population. 3 usda economic research service (ers), household food security in the united states in 2021, september 2022, available at https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub details/?pubid=104655. 4 usda ers, food insecurity security data file, downloaded december 6, 2022, https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food nutrition assistance/food security in the u s/interactive charts and highlights/. 5 usda economic research service,household food security in the united states in 2021, september 2022, https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub details/?pubid=104655. 6 ibid. 7 u.s. census bureau, household pulse survey questionnaire, page 21, available at https://www2.census.gov/programs surveys/demo/technical documentation/hhp/phase_36_household_pulse_survey_english.pdf. sufficient responses include: “enough of the kinds of food (i/we) wanted to eat” and “enough, but not always the kinds of food (i/we) wanted to eat.” insufficient responses include: “sometimes not enough to eat” and “often not enough to eat.” 8 percentages and numbers for new york and the u.s. were calculated by averaging the estimated numbers of individuals aged 18 years and older who sometimes or often did not have enough to eat and dividing those numbers by the estimated numbers of individuals responding to the pulse survey during each of five, two week pulse survey collection periods for week 33 (data collected from june 23 through july 5, 2021) through week 37 (data collected from september 1 through september 13, 2021). despite using a two week collection period, the pulse survey calls these cycles “weeks” to maintain continuity with earlier phases of the survey. 9 iri®, october 2022 price check, tracking retail food and beverage inflation, november 1, 2022, available at https://www.iriworldwide.com/iri/media/library/iri october 2022 inflation check.pdf. shelf stable products are defined by the usda as foods that can be safely stored at room temperature, or "on the shelf." 10 dr. jessica rosati and ana penavic, “the state of food insecurity on long island,” 2021, long island cares. 11 ny health foundation, food insecure new yorkers twice as likely to have unsatisfactory health, august 16, 2022, available at https://nyhealthfoundation.org/2022/08/16/food insecure new yorkers twice as likely to have unsatisfactory health/. 12 usda ers, food access research atlas listings for new york state, accessed december 2022, available at https://www.ers.usda.gov/data products/food access research atlas/go to the atlas/. 13 poonam gupta, julia salas, and elaine waxman, “two years into the pandemic, charitable food remains a key resources for one in six adults,” may 10, 2022, the urban institute. 14 usda food and nutrition security webpage, available at https://www.usda.gov/nutrition security. 15 dariush mozaffarian, md, drph, sheila fleischhacker, phd, jd, rdn, and josé r. andrés, prioritizing nutrition security in the us, april 27, 2021, journal of the american medical association (jama), available at https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article abstract/2778232. 16 ny health foundation, food insecure new yorkers twice as likely to have unsatisfactory health, august 16, 2022, available at https://nyhealthfoundation.org/2022/08/16/food insecure new yorkers twice as likely to have unsatisfactory health/. 17 u.s. department of health and human services (hhs), current federal programming and coordination efforts related to food and nutrition insecurity and diet related diseases, july 2022, available at https://health.gov/sites/default/files/2022 09/current%20federal%20programming%20and%20coordination%20efforts%20related%20to%20food%20and%20nutrition%20insecurity%20and%20diet related%20diseases.pdf. 18 craig gundersen and james p. ziliak, “food insecurity and health outcomes,” november 2015, health affairs, available at https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/epdf/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0645. 19 macpac issue brief, “medicaid managed care capitation rate setting,” march 2022, available at https://www.macpac.gov/wp content/uploads/2022/03/managed care capitation issue brief.pdf. 20 state doh, “nys approved in lieu of services for medicaid managed care,” available at https://www.health.ny.gov/health_care/managed_care/docs/apprvd_in_lieu_of_services.pdf. 21 state department of agriculture and markets, nourish new york   supporting new york farms and communities, available at https://agriculture.ny.gov/nourishny. 22 usda food and nutrition service, fns nutrition programs, available at https://www.fns.usda.gov/programs. 23 usda ers, supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap) overview, available at https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food nutrition assistance/supplemental nutrition assistance program snap/. 24 a good summary of the available research was recently published by the center on budget and policy priorities. see: steven carlson and joseph llobrera, “snap is linked with improved health outcomes and lower health care costs,” december 14, 2022, center on budget and policy priorities, available at https://www.cbpp.org/research/food assistance/snap is linked with improved health outcomes and lower health care costs. 25 usda, cost of living adjustment (cola) information for snap, updated october 1, 2022, available at https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/allotment/cola. gross income means a household's total, non excluded income, before any allowable deductions have been made. if a person is 60 years of age or older and cannot purchase and prepare meals separately because of a permanent disability, the person and the person's spouse may qualify for snap if the gross income of others they live with does not exceed 165 percent of poverty. in new york, households in which all members receive or are authorized to receive family assistance (fa), safety net assistance (sna) and/or supplemental security income (ssi) benefits are eligible for snap because of their status as fa, sna and/or ssi recipients. 26 usda, snap participation rates by state, all eligible people, available at https://www.fns.usda.gov/usamap. 27 initial provision of these supplemental benefits was related to the national public health emergency (phe), which will now end on may 11, 2023. public law no: 117 328, the consolidated appropriations act, 2023, section 503. offsets, available at https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th congress/house bill/2617/text. 28 usda, thrifty food plan, 2021, august 2021, available at https://fns prod.azureedge.us/sites/default/files/resource files/tfp2021.pdf. 29 the thrifty food plan (tfp) represents the weekly cost of a healthy diet across the categories and amounts of foods and beverages required by federal law to feed a family of four persons consisting of a man and a woman ages 20 through 50, a child ages 6 through 8, and a child 9 through 11 years of age. the tfp is the lowest cost of four food plans developed and maintained by the usda to specify the types and quantities of foods people could buy and prepare at home to obtain a nutritious diet at four different cost levels. compared to the tfp, each of the three higher cost usda food plans would provide greater allotments for snap beneficiaries, allowing for increasing quantities of food and greater food choices. as summarized by the food research & action center, a national non profit organization, “the three higher cost food plans allow for more food choices and variety. as a result, the higher cost food plans allow for healthy foods that are not the cheapest options in a food group, unlike the tfp (e.g., more fresh fish instead of canned tuna, more berries instead of bananas.” see frac chat, “thrifty food plan 101 (part 1),” available at https://frac.org/blog/thrifty food plan 101 part 1. 30 this is an increase of $104 over the previous maximum allotment of $835 per month. see usda, snap   fiscal year 2023 cost of living adjustments, available at https://fns prod.azureedge.us/sites/default/files/resource files/snap fy 2023 cola adjustments.pdf. 31 food research & action center, “annual inflation adjustment will increase snap allotments but fundamental change is needed to close meal affordability gap,” august 2022, available at https://frac.org/blog/annual inflation adjustment will increase snap allotments. 32 urban institute, “does snap cover the cost of a meal in your county? the latest data on the gap between snap benefits and meal costs,” november 18, 2021, available at https://www.urban.org/features/does snap cover cost meal your county. 33 usda food and nutrition service, special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children (wic), about wic, updated july 9, 2022, available at https://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/about wic. 34 usda food and nutrition service, special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children (wic), wic eligibility requirements, updated april 22, 2022, available at https://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/wic eligibility requirements. 35 nutritional risks recognized for wic eligibility include medically based risks such as anemia, underweight, maternal age, history of pregnancy complications or poor pregnancy outcomes; and diet based risks such as inadequate consumption of nutrient dense foods, unsound dietary habits, over consumption of certain substances such as fats and salts, and excessive caloric intake. wic foods include infant cereal, iron fortified adult cereal, vitamin c rich fruit or vegetable juice, eggs, milk, cheese, peanut butter, dried and canned beans/peas, and canned fish, as well as soy based beverages, tofu, fruits and vegetables, baby foods, whole wheat bread, and other whole grain options. in addition, wic provides iron fortified infant formula for women who do not fully breastfeed. special infant formulas and medical foods may be provided when prescribed by a physician for a specified medical condition. see usda food and nutrition service, special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children (wic), wic eligibility requirements, updated 04/22/2022, available at https://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/wic eligibility requirements; and wic frequently asked questions (faqs), updated 08/02/2022, available at https://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/frequently asked questions. 36 pandemic related changes and flexibilities include remote issuance of benefits to any participant, allowing state and local wic agencies to conduct certification appointments remotely and   in most states, but not new york   substitutes for the types and amounts of certain wic prescribed foods if their availability is limited. a listing of wic covid 19 waiver flexibilities is available from the usda food and nutrition service at https://www.fns.usda.gov/programs/fns disaster assistance/fns responds covid 19/wic covid 19 waivers. 37 usda, wic data tables, available at https://www.fns.usda.gov/pd/wic program. 38 usda, wic 2019 eligibility and coverage rates, available at https://web.archive.org/web/20220519035007/https://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/2019 eligibility coverage rates. 39 except for the cash value voucher for fruits and vegetables, wic provides quantity based, rather than dollar based, benefits (i.e., participants redeem their food instruments at retail food stores for a specified quantity of specific foods), regardless of how much the wic allowed item costs, according to the 2015 usda report, “the wic program: background, trends, and economic issues, 2015 edition”, available at https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub details/?pubid=43927. 40 the american rescue plan allowed new york and other states to increase wic benefits for purchase of fruits and vegetables   normally $9 per child and $11 for pregnant, postpartum, and breastfeeding women   to $35 per child and adult per month, but only from june 2021 through september 2021. subsequent congressional action increased the benefit to $24 for child participants, $43 for pregnant and postpartum women participants, and $47 for fully and partially breastfeeding women participants in ffy 2022 and to $25 for child participants, $44 for pregnant and postpartum participants, and $49 for fully and partially breastfeeding participants in ffy 2023. see: usda press release, “usda to incentivize purchase of fruits and vegetables under wic for 4 months with american rescue plan funding,” april 28, 2021, available at https://www.usda.gov/media/press releases/2021/04/28/usda incentivize purchase fruits and vegetables under wic 4 months. 41 see “the food and nutrition assistance landscape: fiscal year 2020 annual report,” available at https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/101909/eib 227.pdf. 42 the nslp’s seamless summer option (sso) allows schools to provide “summer or school vacation food service,” but not when schools are open during the regular school year. in april 2021, the usda established a waiver under congressional authority to allow the sso to operate when school is open during the regular school year, effective july 1, 2021 through june 30, 2022. the waiver also allows payment for sso meals and snacks at higher sfsp reimbursement rates. in june 2022, the usda extended the sso waiver through september 2022. 43 the p ebt program was initially authorized from march 2020 through september 2020, but was extended through september 2021 and then re authorized for any school year in which there is a covid 19 public health emergency declaration. it was also amended to allow operation during summer months and expanded to schools with reduced attendance hours due to the pandemic (expanding the program beyond only closed schools) and to children in snap households enrolled in child care facilities affected by pandemic closures and reduced hours. see congressional research service, usda nutrition assistance programs: response to the covid 19 pandemic, updated august 5, 2022, available at https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/r/r46681. 44 ibid. 45 according to otda, for the 2019 20 school year, when all schools were closed and all children attended remotely from march through june 2020, otda issued about $1.1 billion in p ebt benefits to approximately 2.5 million school children. for the 2020 21 school year, otda issued $2.0 billion in p ebt benefits, but could not provide an unduplicated count of children receiving payments. the state’s approved p ebt plan indicates otda expected to distribute benefits to approximately 2.2 million school children. in addition to the payments for school closures and reductions in attendance and hours, otda distributed $715 million in summer p ebt benefits to almost 2 million children. otda has received usda approval of its p ebt plans for school age children for the 2021 22 school year and summer 2022, as well as for children in child care for the 2021 22 school year, and will start issuing child care payments in march 2023 and the other benefits in april, may and early summer 2023. no decision has been made as of this date regarding a current school year or summer 2023 program. see usda food and nutrition service, snap data tables, monthly state level p ebt participation & benefits fy20 22, updated november 10, 2022, available at https://www.fns.usda.gov/pd/supplemental nutrition assistance program snap. 46 public law no: 117 328, the consolidated appropriations act, 2023, section 503. offsets, available at https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th congress/house bill/2617/text. 47 michael karpman, elaine maag, stephen zuckerman, and doug wissoker, “child tax credit recipients experienced a larger decline in food insecurity and a similar change in employment as nonrecipients between 2020 and 2021,” may 9, 2022, the urban institute, available at https://www.urban.org/research/publication/child tax credit recipients experienced larger decline food insecurity and. 48 the white house, biden ⁠harris administration national strategy on hunger, nutrition, and health, september 2022, available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp content/uploads/2022/09/white house national strategy on hunger nutrition and health final.pdf. 49 ibid. 50 usda press release, usda announces framework for shoring up the food supply chain and transforming the food system to be fairer, more competitive, more resilient, june 1, 2022, available at https://www.usda.gov/media/press releases/2022/06/01/usda announces framework shoring food supply chain and transforming. 51 city of new york, mayor’s management report for fiscal year 2022: human resources administration, available at https://www.nyc.gov/assets/operations/downloads/pdf/mmr2022/hra.pdf; and office of the new york state comptroller, “update on new york city staffing trends,” november 2022, available at /files/reports/osdc/pdf/report 13 2023.pdf. 52 ny health foundation, nyhealth survey of food and health, august 2022, available at https://nyhealthfoundation.org/wp content/uploads/2022/11/nyhealth survey of food and health.pdf.pdf. 53 governor kathy hochul, governor hochul signs legislation codifying the nourish new york program into law, november 20, 2021, available at https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/governor hochul signs legislation codifying nourish new york program law. 54 state office for the aging, “nysofa annual report details services to older new yorkers, aging population trends, statistics,” july 13, 2002, available at https://aging.ny.gov/news/nysofa annual report details services older new yorkers aging population trends statistics. 55 state department of agriculture and markets, nourish new york   supporting new york farms and communities, available at https://agriculture.ny.gov/nourishny. 56 state department of agriculture and markets, restaurant resiliency program, available at https://agriculture.ny.gov/restaurantresiliency. 57 state office of general services, overview of tefap presentation, available at https://ogs.ny.gov/system/files/documents/2021/02/overview of tefap presentation.pdf. 58 governor kathy hochul, governor hochul announces one million meals distributed to veterans, service members and their families through new york state's partnership with hellofresh, november 16, 2022, available at https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/governor hochul announces one million meals distributed veterans service members and their. × tell us more about you to receive content related to your area or interests.

an official website of the united states government official websites use .gov a .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the united states. secure .gov websites use https a lock ( lock locked padlock icon ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. primary site navigation logged in as: corresponding author. received 2021 nov 12; revised 2022 jan 28; accepted 2022 mar 8; issue date 2022 jun. since january 2020 elsevier has created a covid 19 resource centre with free information in english and mandarin on the novel coronavirus covid 19. the covid 19 resource centre is hosted on elsevier connect, the company's public news and information website. elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its covid 19 related research that is available on the covid 19 resource centre   including this research content   immediately available in pubmed central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the who covid database with rights for unrestricted research re use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. these permissions are granted for free by elsevier for as long as the covid 19 resource centre remains active. the covid 19 pandemic disrupted food availability and affordability and changed the daily food practices of new yorkers in three critical ways: (1) closing restaurants and public institutions, including schools, reduced food access and changed shopping patterns, food expenditures, and diets; (2) economic disruption exacerbated food insecurity and increased the need for food assistance; and (3) altered food practices affected diets. vulnerable populations were disproportionately affected by these disruptions to the food system. the city's response included emergency measures to stave off food insecurity and hunger, yet the crisis also prompted a refocusing of food governance to address other social equity issues in the food system: fears of engaging with food programs by immigrant communities; disparities in access to online grocers; worker rights and worker ownership; and new priorities for the use of public space. the paper presents policy responses to the pandemic that illustrate how the crisis has opened opportunities for initiating changes that can lead to a more just food system. keywords: covid 19; food insecurity, urban food governance, health disparities, food policy throughout history, the global food system has experienced periods of overproduction, poor harvests, distribution breakdowns, and other disruptions, sometimes significant enough to foment social unrest and political change (clapp and moseley, 2020; barrett, 2020). climate change induced stresses, natural resource depletion, and widening economic inequality have, in recent decades, increased the precariousness of local food systems and have made food crises in cities the “new normal,” requiring municipal governments to respond with food plans and policies (lang, 2010; morgan and sonnino, 2010; hamilton et al., 2020; heslin, 2020; crush, 2013). in the last year, the covid 19 pandemic has affected both global and local food systems (laborde et al., 2020). outbreaks at slaughterhouses slowed meat processing, leading to shortages and price spikes that revealed vulnerabilities in food supply chains (garcés, 2020). covid 19 control measures exposed preexisting social inequities and stratifications and the lack of coherent policies to control the virus or address its economic fallout (kinsey et al., 2020). responses to the pandemic such as school closures and business restrictions have disproportionately burdened low income black, latinx, and immigrant populations, forcing many vulnerable households to cut back on necessities, including food, leading to sharp increases in hunger and food insecurity. although food policy remains a low priority for many local governments (raja, 2020), cities are also sources of policy innovation, places where struggles for community power, control of public space, consumer based activism, and civic engagement lead to novel policies and programs (santo and moragues faus, 2019; cohen and ilieva, 2020). progressive cities have begun to approach food from a perspective that includes the kinds of social, environmental, and economic concerns that the pandemic has made politically salient (moragues faus and morgan, 2015; sonnino, 2019). like previous food crises that have created opportunities for social change (kolodinsky et al., 2020), the current covid 19 pandemic, which has exacerbated food insecurity and racial and ethnic disparities, has opened opportunities to address root causes in addition to symptoms. this paper discusses the case of new york city, where a food crisis resulting from the pandemic has led to emergency responses that contain within them the seeds of social change. it analyzes a set of policy initiatives to address those impacts that attempt to avert hunger and malnourishment and seek to advance equity in the food system. data on new york city's policy responses to covid 19 came from an analysis of policy documents and a review of secondary sources addressing food access, food insecurity, and food labor compiled since march 2020. the author was also part of a collaborative study of the city's response to covid 19 that comprised researchers from the cuny urban food policy institute, the laurie m. tisch center for food, education & policy at teachers college, and the hunter college nyc food policy center that published its initial findings in september 2020 (new york food 20/20, 2020) the pandemic, early policies to curb the spread of covid 19 (see table 1 ), and the resulting economic fallout made it more difficult for new yorkers to obtain food and increased food insecurity and hunger. these negative effects were more severe among black and latinx and lower income people than white and more affluent residents. grocery shopping patterns changed in response to restaurant closures and efforts by individuals to stay at home, significantly increasing the amount of food purchased for home preparation and the percentage of meals prepared and eaten at home. selected new york policy responses to covid 19, march 2020 given the magnitude of the problems facing new york city, city officials launched a large scale effort to stem food insecurity and malnourishment. on march 21, 2020, the city augmented its office of food policy with a “food czar team” headed by the city's department of sanitation commissioner, an experienced manager of complex municipal operations. within three weeks of its launch, the team released a strategy, called feeding new york, to respond to the food crisis caused by the pandemic, including: supporting food pantries and soup kitchens financially, replacing food that had been served by closed schools with emergency meals, and providing food deliveries to homebound new yorkers (city of new york department of sanitation, 2020). the goal was to prevent hunger and malnourishment among the most vulnerable populations. the city's responses also were influenced by the cumulative effect of more than a decade of food activism in new york city by food security organizations, urban farmers and gardeners, social justice advocates, black lives matter protesters, labor unions, progressive public officials, and others demanding that the city act more decisively to address deep seated inequities. the emphasis of activist organizations on equity in the food system led the new york city council in 2019 to release a policy platform, growing food equity in new york city: a city council agenda which reflected this turn to food equity. the city council's food agenda frames food policy in the context of persistent food system injustices, including disparities in the food system that affect the well being of new yorkers (cohen and ilieva, 2020). feeding new york, building on a wide range of food equity plans and proposals, emphasized a rights based approach to food (anderson, 2008) that acknowledged the “existing structural imbalances in our food system” (city of new york department of sanitation, 2020). several policies within the strategy, as well as others initiated during the pandemic, have attempted to address structural disparities affecting food consumers and food workers. these are summarized below. when schools closed, the united states department of agriculture (usda) implemented policies to replace the meals served by school districts, including approving a waiver allowing schools to distribute meals directly to parents, outside of mealtimes, in non congregate settings . new york city quickly established emergency “grab and go” meal pickup locations at 439 sites after the school system's more than 1,300 buildings closed in march 2020. at the emergency locations, parents were able to pick up three meals per child, per day, five days a week. to ensure that immigrant communities were able to avail themselves of the emergency meals, the city had to address fears by many parents of disclosing their personal information to government agencies and participating in programs that might jeopardize citizenship status that has inhibited participation in other food assistance programs (vignola et al. 2018). in new york city, an estimated 504,000 people lack documentation and approximately 1 million live in mixed status households in which a member of the household is undocumented (nyc moia, 2019). the city ensured that undocumented individuals and members of their households could pick up meals for their children from the grab and go program with no questions asked about eligibility (mcloughlin et al., 2020). the department of education's notification to parents emphasized that no registration, identification, or documentation was required to pick up these meals, that no one would be turned away, that adults and children could pick up three meals at one time, and that parents or guardians could pick up meals for their children. because the city had neither required identification nor even proof of children in school, the meals had been effectively available to all people in need, regardless of household composition or documentation status. the federal families first coronavirus response act created a pandemic electronic benefits transfer (p ebt) program that allowed states to provide funds to households with schoolchildren that qualified for free or reduced price school meals to make up the economic value of the school meals that the households lost because of the schools being closed and their children being unable to eat school food. in new york city, p ebt benefits were provided to all households with schoolchildren because of a previous successful advocacy campaign organized by the coalition lunch 4 learning that successfully pressured new york city in 2017 to expand universal free lunch to the entire school system (freudenberg et al., 2018). a central aim of making school lunch free for all students was to eliminate the stigma associated with qualifying for free lunch when other students are required to pay, but during the pandemic an added benefit was the distribution of p ebt funds, worth $420 per child in 2020, to every household with children in new york city schools. p ebt has been particularly valuable to low income immigrant households that are ineligible for other food benefit programs due to their status (bellafante, 2020). the universal payments raised concerns about the fairness of allocating them to all parents regardless of need, and the possibility that stigma might inhibit higher income households from using public benefits. in response, city officials, advocacy organizations, and individual schools advised residents who did not need the extra money to redistribute the benefits received to those in need by using them and donating an equivalent amount to an emergency food organization, or by buying groceries with the benefits and donating the food to a local emergency food pantry. a new york city council member even coordinated with three supermarkets in his district to enable people who wished to donate their benefits to have the stores deliver the groceries purchased with p ebt directly from the checkout counter to local emergency food providers and mutual aid organizations (lander, 2020). in april 2019, usda launched a pilot program in new york city to enable supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap) participants to pay for groceries online using their snap benefits (cohen et al., 2020). while initially aimed at providing lower income consumers equal access to the convenience and large inventory of online grocers, the pandemic increased adoption of online grocery shopping as consumers sought to reduce supermarket trips to avoid exposure to covid 19. usda responded to the increased demand by expanding the snap online pilot to 47 states (usda, 2020). despite its expansion, the pilot's burdensome administrative requirements have limited participation to a small number of retailers, with walmart and amazon the only approved retailers in most states (redman, 2020). in new york city, authorized retailers include shoprite, which delivers to a limited area in the borough staten island, and amazon and aldi, which deliver in all five boroughs (cohen et al., 2020). for independent grocers, especially small retailers, not only is the snap online pilot out of reach because of usda's technological and financial barriers, but so is any online ordering and fulfillment option because of the cost of creating an online platform and home delivery service. to address disparity in access to online grocery shopping and to support local businesses, the mayor's taskforce on racial inclusion and equity identified five high need neighborhoods (harlem, mott haven, brownsville, richmond hill, and stapleton) and created a city pilot to enable independent grocers in these communities to sell groceries online (redman, 2020). the city partnered with the e commerce company mercato to provide ordering and delivery services and launched the pilot with 35 independent supermarkets as well as food retailers housed in public markets operated by the city's economic development corporation. dining restrictions, a steep drop in tourism, and the economic recession have resulted in substantial layoffs in the city's food and beverage industry, which prior to the pandemic accounted for 1 in 12 private sector jobs (office of the new york state comptroller, 2020). the city has taken several steps to address the economic consequences of the pandemic on the restaurant industry in ways that extend beyond saving businesses and jobs by promoting livable wages, better working conditions, entrepreneurship, and employee ownership. the following policy changes also built on a decade of labor and social justice organizing in new york to increase the minimum wage and provide paid sick leave to a wider array of low wage workers, especially fast food workers . the city created a restaurant revitalization program to sustain or re start restaurants with two explicit equity aims: to support employment and food production in neighborhoods facing immediate needs and to advance equity as part of the city's economic recovery. the program privileges restaurants that commit to “high road” practices defined as those “in which employers voluntarily commit to higher than legally required standards with respect to wages, racial and gender equity, and other core conditions of work” (new york city, 2020). this means that qualified restaurants must pay at least the full minimum wage (not including tips) to all workers within five years of returning to regular business practices post pandemic and must report wages annually. in addition, applications to the program are scored based on fair employment practices, plans to make meals accessible to essential workers and low income community residents, being in the city's racial inclusion and equity task force target neighborhoods, and a commitment to using local and regional produce and products that support the region (new york city, 2020). the city launched employee ownership nyc in december 2020 to provide business advisors to enable owners to transition their companies to worker ownership (city of new york office of the mayor, 2020a). the aims are to support wealth creation among a new class of worker owners and to help owners of businesses who might otherwise have difficulty finding buyers during the pandemic to sell their companies to employees instead of merely closing shop. the pandemic led to increased food delivery carried out by a largely immigrant workforce that often faces low wages, wage theft, and physical hazards. many food delivery workers use bicycles, particularly electric bicycles, and have been stigmatized as dangerous to pedestrians and subject to racial profiling by the police (lee, 2016). the city until recently banned electric bikes and fined delivery workers riding them and confiscated their bicycles. recognizing the inequities of this ban on a vulnerable, low wage workforce performing a service demanded by residents trying to reduce exposure to covid 19, the city reversed course and legalized the devices, dismissing 68 previously issued summonses (meyer, 2020). in january and april, 2022, the city enacted additional laws to protect delivery workers by: allowing delivery workers to set limits on the distance they travel from food establishments to customer homes; prohibiting delivery apps and couriers from charging delivery workers fees for their wages; establishing minimum per trip payments that delivery services must pay to delivery workers; requiring delivery services to provide workers with insulated food delivery bags; ensuring access to bathrooms; and requiring delivery apps to disclose customer tips to delivery workers. in 2016, the city enacted local law 11, the grocery worker retention act, to prevent wholesale firings when supermarkets changed hands by requiring the new owners to retain former workers for at least 90 days. in september 2020, for the first time, the city's department of consumer and worker protection filed a successful lawsuit against a key food supermarket for illegally firing 21 grocery workers after purchasing the store, securing approximately $210,000 in lost wages and benefits and $27,000 in fines (city of new york department of consumer affairs, 2020). as sit down restaurants closed, fast food was often the only source of prepared hot food in many neighborhoods, making those employed at fast food restaurants a type of essential worker. fast food establishments in new york city employ more than 67,000 people, 88% of whom are people of color, mostly immigrants and women (center for popular democracy et al., 2020). unfair terminations and reductions in hours are common in this sector, causing workers financial hardship and preventing them from speaking up about unsafe or illegal practices. on december 17, 2020, the new york city council enacted two bills (int. no. 1396 2019 and int. no. 1415 2019) supporting fast food workers: legislation prohibiting fast food employers from firing workers without just cause and legislation requiring layoffs in fast food firms to be by inverse seniority so that those hired last are laid off first (freytas tamura, 2020). to support restaurants and retain food sector jobs, the city created an open restaurants program that allowed restaurants with restrictions on indoor service to serve food on sidewalks and streets. open restaurants has enrolled more than 10,000 businesses and is estimated to have saved 90,000 restaurant jobs, approximately 55,000 of which are held by immigrants (office of the nys comptroller, 2020). this new use of public space has involved creative design, such as the outdoor seating areas designed by non profit organizations in congested neighborhoods like chinatown (imbruce, 2020). the city also expanded an open streets program, which closed approximately 85 streets to vehicle traffic for public use, allowing businesses in the open restaurants program to set up tables for dining in the traffic free streets. both initiatives represent a significant change in new york city's use of public spaces compared to pre pandemic, when new york city communities vehemently opposed the loss of parking spaces to uses such as bicycle lanes (grynbaum, 2011). the popularity of the initiatives has led former mayor de blasio to initiate a process to make them permanent (new york city office of the mayor, 2020c). the examples above illustrate policy responses designed to meet the immediate needs of the pandemic, such as distributing emergency food and financial assistance, ensuring access to grocers, and supporting the restaurant industry hurt by economic crisis. they show that the policies were also designed with equity goals: supporting vulnerable immigrant communities; redistributing resources; improving wages, working conditions, and job security; supporting the transition from conventional business forms to worker ownership; and reallocating the uses of public space. before the pandemic, new york city faced significant problems related to food access, food security, and food affordability (freudenberg et al., 2018). in addition, the city has faced other catastrophic events in recent history that have disrupted the food system, such as hurricane (“superstorm”) sandy, which caused destruction to the new york metropolitan region in 2012 that affected access to fresh food, electricity and gas for cooking, and snap benefits (schmeltz et al., 2013). the pandemic, and policies to curb its transmission, exacerbated these existing challenges. self quarantining and social distancing restrictions limited movement throughout the city, decreasing opportunities for people to buy food on the way to and from work, school, and other places they would typically frequent. early in the pandemic, a reduction in transit service (goldbaum, 2020) compounded the inconvenience of buying groceries for those who depend on buses and subways to get to and from the supermarket, and the virus made grocery shopping potentially risky. pandemic related difficulties in getting needed food were disproportionately experienced by latinx and black households and households with low income. more significantly, the pandemic worsened food insecurity. prior to covid 19, just over 1 million new yorkers were food insecure, relying on a patchwork of free school meals, other public agency and non profit congregate feeding programs, volunteer soup kitchens and food pantries, and financial support from federal programs like snap (mayor's office of food policy, 2019). for households with limited incomes and precarious employment, the economic disruption of the pandemic increased food insecurity and hunger to levels not seen in recent history. by 2021, the projected number of food insecure new yorkers was approximately 1.4 million individuals (mayor's office of food policy, 2022). the crisis triggered various policy changes, some temporary and likely to end once the health crisis is over and others that open the door to more transformative changes. the city's response to the pandemic was shaped by near term public health challenges but also was the product of more than a decade of food activism in new york city by community based organizations, labor unions, and progressive officials in the city council and mayoral administration. this suggests that while the shock of a crisis is often used to clear the way for regressive changes (klein, 2007), crises can also be used to open the door for equity enhancing measures. in new york city, food and social justice activism set the stage for this response to the pandemic. by widening access to public food programs for immigrants, protecting low wage food workers from health harming labor practices, expanding access to online food ordering to low income communities and smaller food businesses, creating new opportunities to open worker owned businesses, and making public spaces more available to restaurants by limiting space for car parking, new york city has shown that municipal responses to the covid 19 pandemic attempted to advance a more equitable food system and a more just city. the authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. this research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not for profit sectors. articles from urban governance are provided here courtesy of elsevier connect with nlm national library of medicine 8600 rockville pike bethesda, md 20894
supported by we want to know how new yorkers of all incomes are handling the challenges in getting food during the pandemic. by nikita stewart and elaine chen with spiking unemployment in new york city, the need for food assistance has only grown. food pantries across the country are seeing a surge of demand. but like many businesses, food banks are grappling with disruptions in supplies and workers. almost 40 percent of delivery sites in new york city have closed. there are people going to food pantries for the first time, and regular customers dealing with changing hours and locations. we asked readers to share their stories, which helped inform this reporting. nikita stewart is the editor of real estate at the times. more about nikita stewart elaine chen joined the times in 2017 from wnyc public radio. before media, she was a lawyer for the new york city government. she now works on times events. more about elaine chen

metropolitics is pleased to present the second dossier coordinated by faculty and students in the phd program in sociology at the graduate center of the city university of new york (cuny), which explore new york city specific issues. this dossier, comprising four articles, examines new york city’s food industry in the face of the covid‑19 pandemic. sharon zukin introduces the series, with articles by thomas r. chung, nga than, and ivana mellers to follow. since the covid‑19 pandemic wreaked havoc on new york’s food industry in 2020, its long term effects, like those of the illness itself, have been persistent and severe. the city’s economy depends on office work and tourism; when companies shifted to working from home and travel drastically declined, the food industry was decimated. most visibly, restaurants, which before the pandemic provided a large and growing base for the city’s service economy (new york state comptroller 2020), were suddenly shut down. then, after the state government allowed them to reopen, they were hampered by constantly changing restrictions issued by the governor, the mayor, and local and federal public health authorities. wildly popular outdoor dining that has enabled at least 10,000 restaurants to survive now confronts a patchwork of ad hoc regulations by the city government and an uncertain process for both permanent legalization and determining rent (fortney et al. 2021). food processing, the only manufacturing sector to grow in new york in recent years (becker and dourmashkin 2015), is strained by efforts to procure materials and recruit labor.