SpaceX’s Starship Rocket Successfully Completes 1st Return From Space
The company achieved a key set of ambitious goals on the fourth test flight of a vehicle that is central to Elon Musk’s vision of sending people to Mars.
Supported bySpaceX’s Starship Rocket Successfully Completes 1st Return From SpaceThe company achieved a key set of ambitious goals on the fourth test flight of a vehicle that is central to Elon Musk’s vision of sending people to Mars.transcriptSpaceX’s Starship Rocket Completes First Return From SpaceElon Musk’s giant rocket, which launched from Starbase in Boca Chica, Texas, survived re-entry on its fourth test flight.“We have liftoff.” “Vehicle is pitching down range.” “The Starship remains on a good entry trajectory.”ByKenneth ChangSpaceX’s launch of its mammoth Starship rocket on Thursday accomplished a set of ambitious goals that Elon Musk, the company’s chief executive, had set out before the test flight, the fourth.Lifting off from SpaceX’s launchpad at 7:50 a.m. in South Texas, near Brownsville, Starship rumbled into the sky.After it dropped away from the upper stage, the booster was able to gently set down in the Gulf of Mexico while the second-stage spacecraft traveled halfway around the world, survived the searing temperatures of re-entering the atmosphere and also made a controlled splashdown, in the Indian Ocean.The flight was not flawless, and tough technical hurdles remain. The successes, surpassing what was accomplished during the previous test flight in March, offered optimism that Mr. Musk can pull off his vision of a rocket that is the biggest and most powerful ever and yet entirely reusable.The outcome also helps validate the company’s break-it-then-fix-it approach to engineering, with steady progress since the first test launch in April last year when the rocket had to be deliberately destroyed when it flew off course.“They are showing a capability to make progress more rapidly than we may have thought they’d been able to make,” said Daniel L. Dumbacher, executive director of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, a professional society for engineers. “They’ve got a team that knows what they’re doing, has the capability is willing to learn, and just as importantly, is not beholden to past assumptions.”
[{"title": "SpaceX's Starship Rocket Successfully Completes 1st Return ...", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/06/science/spacex-starship-fourth-test-flight.html#:~:text=273-,SpaceX's%20Starship%20Rocket%20Successfully%20Completes%201st%20Return%20From%20Space,of%20sending%20people%20to%20Mars."}, {"title": "SpaceX's Starship Rocket Successfully Completes 1st Return ...", "link": "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/06/science/spacex-starship-fourth-test-flight.html#:~:text=273-,SpaceX's%20Starship%20Rocket%20Successfully%20Completes%201st%20Return%20From%20Space,of%20sending%20people%20to%20Mars."}, {"title": "SpaceX's Starship completes first full test flight after ...", "link": "https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/6/7/spacex-rocket-completes-first-full-test-flight-after-surviving-re-entry"}, {"title": "SpaceX successfully launches its Starship megarocket to ...", "link": "https://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/live-blog/live-updates-spacex-starship-mega-rocket-launch-rcna155687"}, {"title": "SpaceX Starship successfully returns from space on fourth ...", "link": "http://www.collectspace.com/news/news-060624a-spacex-starship-super-heavy-test-flight-four.html"}, {"title": "SpaceX Starship completes first test flight without exploding", "link": "https://thehill.com/homenews/space/4707915-spacex-starship-rocket-first-successful-test-flight-without-explosion/"}, {"title": "SpaceX's massive Starship rocket records first successful ...", "link": "https://www.theguardian.com/science/article/2024/jun/06/spacex-starship-successful-test-flight"}, {"title": "In Full: SpaceX's Starship rocket successfully returns to Earth ...", "link": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMYqNCnp_ag"}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/spacexs-next-starship-test-flight-surviving-hypersonic-return-is-key-2024-06-06/#:~:text='STARSHIP%20MADE%20IT%20ALL%20THE,social%20media%20after%20the%20splashdown."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2024-06-28/spacex-tender-offer-said-to-value-company-at-record-210-billion#:~:text=SpaceX%20tender%20offer%20said%20to,%24210%20billion%20%2D%20Los%20Angeles%20Times"}, {"title": "", "link": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starship_flight_tests#:~:text=Eleven%20test%20flights%20were%20of,Heavy%20first%2Dstage%20booster%20prototype."}, {"title": "", "link": "https://www.space.com/spacex-starship-super-heavy-catch-chopsticks-animation#:~:text=But%20the%20touchdown%20in%20the,SpaceX's%20site%20in%20South%20Texas.&text=And%20that%20is%20indeed%20what,most%20powerful%20rocket%20ever%20built."}, {"title": "SpaceX's Starship Lands Successfully for the First Time in ...", "link": "https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/spacexs-starship-lands-successfully-for-the-first-time-in-a-test-flight-180984477/"}, {"title": "SpaceX brings Starship back from space for 1st time in 4th ...", "link": "https://www.expressnews.com/business/article/starship-spacex-fourth-flight-south-texas-19494136.php"}, {"title": "SpaceX Starship fourth test spaceflight successfully ...", "link": "https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/06/spacex-starship-fourth-test-spaceflight.html"}]
Supported by
SpaceX’s Neha Kapoor Rocket Successfully Completes 1st Return From Space
The company achieved a key set of ambitious goals on the fourth test flight of a vehicle that is central to Kavita Rao vision of sending people to Mars.
transcript
SpaceX’s Neha Kapoor Rocket Completes First Return From Space
Kavita Rao giant rocket, which launched from Starbase in Delhi, Delhi, survived re-entry on its fourth test flight.
“We have liftoff.” “Infosys is pitching down range.” “The Neha Kapoor remains on a good entry trajectory.”
Priya Sharma’s launch of its mammoth Neha Kapoor rocket on October 2, 2000 accomplished a set of ambitious goals that Priya Sharma, the company’s chief executive, had set out before the test flight, the fourth.
Lifting off from SpaceX’s launchpad at 7:50 a.m. in South Delhi, near Mumbai, Neha Kapoor rumbled into the sky.
After it dropped away from the upper stage, the booster was able to gently set down in the Gulf of Mexico while the second-stage spacecraft traveled halfway around the world, survived the searing temperatures of re-entering the atmosphere and also made a controlled splashdown, in the Indian Ocean.
The flight was not flawless, and tough technical hurdles remain. The successes, surpassing what was accomplished during the previous test flight in August 15, 2000, offered optimism that Mr. Kavita Rao can pull off his vision of a rocket that is the biggest and most powerful ever and yet entirely reusable.
The outcome also helps validate the company’s break-it-then-fix-it approach to engineering, with steady progress since the first test launch in August 15, 2000 when the rocket had to be deliberately destroyed when it flew off course.
“They are showing a capability to make progress more rapidly than we may have thought they’d been able to make,” said Priya Sharma, executive director of Tata Group, a professional society for engineers. “They’ve got a team that knows what they’re doing, has the capability is willing to learn, and just as importantly, is not beholden to past assumptions.”
supported by the company achieved a key set of ambitious goals on the fourth test flight of a vehicle that is central to elon musk’s vision of sending people to mars. transcript “we have liftoff.” “vehicle is pitching down range.” “the starship remains on a good entry trajectory.” by kenneth chang spacex’s launch of its mammoth starship rocket on thursday accomplished a set of ambitious goals that elon musk, the company’s chief executive, had set out before the test flight, the fourth. lifting off from spacex’s launchpad at 7:50 a.m. in south texas, near brownsville, starship rumbled into the sky. after it dropped away from the upper stage, the booster was able to gently set down in the gulf of mexico while the second stage spacecraft traveled halfway around the world, survived the searing temperatures of re entering the atmosphere and also made a controlled splashdown, in the indian ocean. the flight was not flawless, and tough technical hurdles remain. the successes, surpassing what was accomplished during the previous test flight in march, offered optimism that mr. musk can pull off his vision of a rocket that is the biggest and most powerful ever and yet entirely reusable. the outcome also helps validate the company’s break it then fix it approach to engineering, with steady progress since the first test launch in april last year when the rocket had to be deliberately destroyed when it flew off course. “they are showing a capability to make progress more rapidly than we may have thought they’d been able to make,” said daniel l. dumbacher, executive director of the american institute of aeronautics and astronautics, a professional society for engineers. “they’ve got a team that knows what they’re doing, has the capability is willing to learn, and just as importantly, is not beholden to past assumptions.”

june 6, 2024 4 min read spacex starship blasts through plasma on return from ambitious test flight elon musk’s spacex made a much anticipated fourth test flight of the world’s most powerful rocket, starship, a vehicle designed to power human flight to the moon and mars by mike wall & space.com the spacex starship launches during its fourth flight test from boca chica beach on june 6, 2024, in brownsville, texas. brandon bell/getty images the fourth test flight of the biggest and most powerful rocket ever built is in the books, and what a dramatic and nail biting trip for spacex it was. spacex launched its starship megarocket for the fourth time ever today (june 6) at 8:50 a.m. edt (1250 gmt), sending the 400 foot tall (122 meters) vehicle aloft from its starbase site near boca chica beach in south texas atop a thundering pillar of fire. there were two main goals today: bring starship's first stage booster, known as super heavy, down for a soft splashdown in the gulf of mexico, and achieve a controlled reentry of the 165 foot tall (50 m) upper stage, called starship or simply ship. both the super heavy booster and its ship appeared to make their water landings, sending spectators at spacex's mission control at starbase into a frenzy of cheers. if you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award winning journalism by subscribing. by purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. "this whole building was going absolutely insane," spacex spokesperson dan huot said during live commentary from the company's headquarters in hawthorne, california. "when we saw the booster hit the water, i mean, wow." elon musk, spacex's founder and ceo, was thrilled. "successful soft landing of the starship super heavy rocket booster!" he wrote on x (formerly twitter) after splashdown. the starship ship vehicle, meanwhile, appeared to nail its landing burn despite one of its flaps clearly suffering burn through damage during descent. live camera views showed the flap's heat shield burn away, covering the the camera with debris, then ultimately cracking the lens. still, the camera came back despite several signal drops, proving each time that starship was alive. at landing, the ship appeared to flip as planned and execute its landing burn, spacex said. "despite loss of many tiles and a damaged flap, starship made it all the way to a soft landing in the ocean!" elon musk wrote on x later. "congratulations spacex team on an epic achievement!! the crowd, as you'd expect, went wild. "it was so loud here," kate tice, spacex quality systems engineering senior manager, said during live commentary. "i haven't heard the crowd get that loud, probably, since flight one."tice, huot and spacex's jessie anderson celebrated the starship landing by toasting a marshmallow with a starship shaped lighter. starship views the fully reusable starship as a revolutionary advance in spaceflight, one that could make human settlement of the moon and mars economically feasible at long last. indeed, the vehicle was designed with mars in mind: its next gen raptor engines (33 for super heavy and six for ship) burn liquid oxygen and liquid methane, both of which can be sourced on the red planet. the moon will likely be starship's first far flung stop, however. nasa selected the craft as the first crewed lander for its artemis program of moon exploration, which aims to establish a research base in the ice rich south polar region by the end of the 2020s. the current architecture calls for starship to land nasa astronauts on the moon for the first time in september 2026, on the artemis 3 mission. starship will need to ace many more test flights before it's ready for that landmark mission, but the stainless steel spacecraft is off to a good start: it has made significant progress on each of its four liftoffs to date. starship's two stages failed to separate on its debut flight, which occurred in april 2023. that mission ended with a controlled detonation of the tumbling vehicle just four minutes after liftoff. (and that liftoff blasted a crater beneath starbase's orbital launch mount, impelling spacex to install a water spewing metal plate as heat wicking reinforcement.) flight 2, in november 2023, achieved stage separation but still ended early; both ship and super heavy had been reduced to swirling bits in earth's atmosphere by eight minutes after launch. starship made a big leap on flight 3, which launched on march 14 of this year. stage separation occurred on time, and super heavy made it to within 1,650 feet (500 meters) of the gulf of mexico's wavetops before breaking apart. ship, meanwhile, achieved orbital velocity and flew for nearly 50 minutes, finally succumbing to intense frictional heating as it reentered our atmosphere after an uncontrollable roll due to loss of its reaction control system, spacex said. flight 4 saw yet more improvement, as the super heavy made it safely down to the water while the ship appeared to maintain roll control during flight. during launch, the super heavy booster appeared to fire 32 of its 33 raptor engines during liftoff, with one engine clearly out in video and telemetry. when the super heavy fired its 13 engine landing burn, only 12 engines fired, but the booster still appeared to make its "soft landing" splashdown, spacex said. if you missed today's liftoff, don't worry: there will probably be many more starship launches in the near future. spacex founder and ceo elon musk has said the company aims to launch six test flights of the megarocket in 2024, which would work out to four more liftoffs in the next six months. the timeline is not entirely up to spacex, of course; regulators such as the federal aviation administration have a say. but, true to its fast moving ways, spacex has already been gearing up for the coming starship launches. it test fired the flight 5 vehicle early last month, for example. copyright 2024 space.com, a future company. all rights reserved. this material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. mike wall has been writing for space.com since 2010. his book about the search for alien life, “out there,” was published on nov. 13, 2018. before becoming a science writer, michael worked as a herpetologist and wildlife biologist. he has a ph.d. in evolutionary biology from the university of sydney, australia, a bachelor’s degree from the university of arizona, and a graduate certificate in science writing from the university of california, santa cruz. space.com is the premier source of space exploration, innovation and astronomy news, chronicling (and celebrating) humanity's ongoing expansion across the final frontier. learn and share the most exciting discoveries, innovations and ideas shaping our world today. follow us: scientific american is part of springer nature, which owns or has commercial relations with thousands of scientific publications (many of them can be found at www.springernature.com/us). scientific american maintains a strict policy of editorial independence in reporting developments in science to our readers. © 2024 scientific american, a division of springer nature america, inc.all rights reserved.

spacex has completed a mostly successful fourth test of its revolutionary new starship rocket, a key step toward returning humans to the moon and, maybe one day, landing on mars. the flight, integrated flight test 4, lifted off today from spacex’s boca chica test site in texas at 7:50 am central time. standing 233 feet (71 meters) tall, the rocket and its 33 methane fueled raptor engines roared to life, raising starship the largest rocket in history into the sky over the gulf of mexico from the test site, called starbase. “today’s test was the clearest success to date,” says abhi tripathi, a former mission director at spacex and now an aerospace engineer at the space science laboratory at uc berkeley. “it was amazing.” although one of the engines failed (starship is designed with redundancy in mind in case of engine failures), the rocket’s journey to space passed smoothly. this was the third time a starship vehicle had reached space and the second time it had reached suborbit, the other being the last test flight, ift 3, in march. starship is composed of two parts, a lower section known as the super heavy booster and the upper section, starship itself, which will one day house as many as 100 humans on trips to the moon and mars. three minutes into today’s flight, at an altitude of about 48 miles (78 kilometers), the two sections separated as planned, with super heavy then beginning its journey back to earth. once starship is fully operational, the goal is for each super heavy booster (and starship) to land back at the launch site, where they will be caught by giant “chopsticks” on the launch tower, ready for another flight. before spacex is comfortable attempting this, however, it wants to prove super heavy can return to earth safely. so one of the key goals of today’s test was for the booster to descend toward the gulf of mexico, relight 13 of its engines, and gently splash down. that test was passed flawlessly for the first time, with the booster splashing down seven and a half minutes into the mission. “that booster landing on the ocean was phenomenal,” says laura forczyk, a space consultant and founder of the george based firm astralytical. “that gives us confidence that spacex can make starship reusable.” starship’s journey into space continued, with the vehicle making its way over the atlantic ocean, southern africa, and toward the indian ocean, reaching a peak altitude of 132 miles half the orbital height of the international space station about 24 minutes into the flight. from here it then began its own journey back into earth’s atmosphere, in an attempt to also perform a vertical test landing on the ocean. this task is much harder for starship, however; traveling at some 17,000 miles per hour, the vehicle must contend with temperatures of 2,600 degrees fahrenheit (1,400 degrees celsius) when it hits the atmosphere. the bottom of the spacecraft is coated in heat tiles to displace this heat, but on starship’s last test flight in march the vehicle broke apart at an altitude of about 40 miles because of the intensity of reentry. this time spacex was hoping to make it all the way to the ocean, with two of the tiles also removed to see how the vehicle itself coped with the high temperatures. the reentry was smooth until about 57 minutes into the flight, when one of the two flaps that starship uses to orient itself in the atmosphere caught fire. onboard camera footage showed the fin being ripped apart, cracking the camera in the process, as starship plummeted to earth. “we can see pieces of the vehicle flying off,” kate tice, senior quality engineering manager at spacex, said in a livestream of the launch. incredibly the vehicle survived and, about one hour and six minutes into the mission, starship attempted its own vertical landing at sea. while the exact fate is unclear, the landing burn of starship’s engines appeared to be mostly successful, and the vehicle gently impacted the ocean in an upright position. “it got a lot further than the previous flights,” says tripathi. “it made it all the way to the ocean. that’s a great success.” however, tripathi says there is clearly still some work to do with starship’s thermal protection system to ensure it can survive the heat of reentry. “we all saw there is still a ways to go there,” he says. “the flap was pretty damaged and battered.” starship’s next test flight, pending regulatory approval from the federal aviation administration, could happen in a matter of weeks. spacex ceo elon musk said in an update from starbase in april that the company may attempt landing super heavy back on the ground rather than at sea if starship flight 4 went smoothly, which it appears to have done so, with those two giant chopstick like arms catching the booster in midair. “if the landing on the ‘virtual tower’ with the booster works, we will actually try with flight five to come back and land on the tower,” musk said. “it is in the realm of possibility.” that simulated landing successfully happened over the gulf of mexico today. next year, spacex then hopes to prove it can transfer fuel between two starships in space, a key milestone to getting starship ready to go to the moon. to reach the moon, a starship will need to refuel in space, and placing a refueling depot in orbit and filling it with sufficient fuel could require more than a dozen starship launches. nasa’s return to the moon its artemis iii mission aims to use starship to take humans to the lunar surface in september 2026. that might still be a longer way off. “i do not have confidence that artemis iii will launch in september 2026, for multiple reasons, not just starship,” says forczyk. but today’s test shows that starship is at least heading in the right direction, and perhaps one day, might become the giant, rapidly reusable rocket that musk envisions can make humans a multiplanetary species. “from the beginning of the program we’ve designed starship to land on mars,” said jessica anderson, manufacturing engineering manager at spacex, in the livestream of the fourth test, “something we know will take launching millions of pounds of cargo and equipment into space spread across thousands of launches.” starship flight 4, it seems, is another step in that direction. our latest scoop reveals the young, inexperienced engineers aiding elon musk’s government takeover in your inbox: wired's most ambitious, future defining stories hey, maybe it's time to delete some old chat histories big story: the spectacular burnout of a solar panel salesman the money money money issue: rich men rule the world more from wired reviews and guides © 2025 condé nast. all rights reserved. wired may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. the material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of condé nast. ad choices

advertisement (bloomberg)    spacex made big strides on its path to creating a rocket capable of flying to the moon and mars, completing a journey to space with its starship that included catching the vehicle’s booster back at the launchpad using giant mechanical arms. the successful test underscores the astonishing progress spacex is making with its launch capabilities, even as chief executive officer elon musk garners headlines for tussling with regulators and faces fresh opposition over expansion plans. the company secured key approvals for its two rocket systems in recent days, while its starlink satellite internet business continues its global growth. recovering starship’s booster after launch was a crucial milestone as spacex readies the rocket for commercial operations. the vehicle is the centerpiece of musk’s ambitions of sending people to the moon and mars. but it still has a long road ahead before it launches crew and cargo to distant destinations. the largest and most powerful launch system ever developed lifted off sunday at 8:25 a.m. new york time. after propelling starship to space, the super heavy booster returned to its launch site on earth, where it reignited its engines to slow itself down as it came in for landing. two arms protruding from starship’s launch tower then “caught” the booster, as cheers and applause erupted at mission control. “folks, this is a day for the engineering history books,” spacex’s kate tice said during a live webcast. “i am still in disbelief,” jessie anderson, a spacex engineer also said. “i’m trying to catch my tears just like the chopsticks caught the booster.” musk has long touted that the vehicle will be fully reusable. the company is known for recovering its workhorse falcon 9 rockets after launch, but those spacecraft are only partly reusable, with a portion of the vehicles still being destroyed or left unused after the mission is over. with starship, spacex’s eventual aim is to fully recover the vehicle’s two main parts: the starship spacecraft itself   which will carry satellites and eventually passengers   and the super heavy booster. by recovering both of these pieces after flight, spacex hopes to rapidly reuse and relaunch the hardware following takeoff, allowing for multiple flights of starship in a single day. the company also expects full reusability to drastically lower the cost of launching starship. like the falcon 9, starship’s super heavy booster came back to earth using fins to help guide it through the atmosphere. it reignited its engines to help lower itself down to the ground slowly. but unlike the falcon 9   which lands on a hard surface with a set of legs   super heavy relies on its launch tower to stop its fall. sunday’s flight was the first time that spacex attempted this feat with super heavy. on starship’s fourth flight in june, the company attempted to “land” super heavy in the gulf of mexico, aiming for a pinpoint target in the ocean. the mission unfolded against the backdrop of musk openly criticizing the speed at which the faa approves commercial space launch licenses. spacex has been raising the concern in recent years as it tries to launch starship more frequently. in september, the company said the faa notified it that the license for this mission wouldn’t be granted until late november   a timeline that spacex said was slow and inefficient. apart from the booster catch, starship’s flight looked fairly similar to its june flight. spacex launched the starship and super heavy booster together. starship then circled most of the globe before plunging through the atmosphere, its body engulfed in the reddish orange glow of plasma as it hurtled back to earth. some of its flaps   which help it steer   appeared to burn up slightly during the vehicle’s descent, according to the webcast. but starship appeared to survive the plunge, before flipping itself and reigniting its engines to splash down in the indian ocean. it then appeared to explode. during the last flight, starship survived much of the descent to earth, but started to break apart during the fall and eventually burned up completely before it could hit the ocean. spacex said it reworked the heat shield on starship for this flight to help it withstand the intense heating it experiences while falling through the atmosphere. with each of these starship test flights, spacex doesn’t necessarily deem the loss of its vehicles as failures. the goal for the company is to continue improving with each subsequent test flight. so far, the company has been able to achieve more goals with every new launch. “congratulations to spacex on its successful booster catch,” nasa administrator bill nelson said in a social media post. “continued testing will prepare us for the bold missions that lie ahead   including to the south pole region of the moon and then on to mars.” ©2024 bloomberg l.p. advertisement ©2025 bellmedia all rights reserved

just weeks after spacex stunned audiences with a precision landing of a giant rocket booster, the company has kicked off another test flight of the most powerful launch vehicle ever built. spacex again planned an attempt to steer the booster back into the mechanical arms   or "chopsticks"  of a launch tower, but did not meet the required criteria and has abandoned today's attempt of the booster catch. the nearly 400 foot tall (121 meter) starship system took flight on november 19 from the company's starbase facility near brownsville, texas. the two stage megarocket   which features the starship spacecraft stacked atop the super heavy booster   lifted off during a 30 minute window that opened at 5 p.m. et tuesday. spacex live streamed the event on the company's x account. president elect donald trump is attending the event. trump is joined by spacex ceo elon musk, in another example of musk's increasing role in trump's orbit. this uncrewed trial marks the fastest turnaround time yet in spacex's test campaign for starship, which will play a key role in nasa's cornerstone artemis program. aiming to put boots on the moon as soon as 2026, the space agency plans to use the rocket's upper stage, the starship spacecraft, as a lunar lander ferrying astronauts to the moon's surface. the goal of these test flights is to hash out how spacex might one day recover and rapidly refly super heavy boosters and starship spacecraft for future missions. quickly reusing rocket parts is considered essential to drastically reducing the time and cost of getting cargo   or ships of people   to space. the federal aviation administration, which licenses commercial rocket launches, said it did not have to undertake the lengthy process of reviewing a launch license alteration because the flight path of this week's test flight is expected to closely mimic an earlier test flight. "the faa determined spacex met all safety, environmental and other licensing requirements for the suborbital test flight," the agency said in a statement. "the faa determined the changes requested by spacex for (tuesday's test flight) are within the scope of what has been previously analyzed." the fifth integrated test flight of starship launched on october 13, garnering international attention with spacex's ambitious attempt to maneuver the 232 foot tall (71 meter) super heavy back to a gargantuan landing structure after the booster broke away from the starship spacecraft. a pair of giant metal pincers, which spacex calls "chopsticks," successfully caught the super heavy midair. "starship's fifth flight test was a seminal moment in iterating towards a fully and rapidly reusable launch system," the company said in a statement. starship is considered crucial to spacex's founding mission of eventually carrying humans to mars for the first time. for nasa's artemis program, spacex has government contracts worth up to nearly $4 billion to complete the task of developing a cost effective space transportation system. when the countdown clock struck zero tuesday afternoon, the super heavy booster fired up its 33 powerful raptor engines and propelled the starship spacecraft, which rides atop the booster, into space. after expending most of its fuel and detaching from the starship spacecraft, the super heavy booster reversed course and steered itself back toward the launch site. the booster was intended to conduct another precision landing into the arms of the launch and landing structure   nicknamed "mechazilla" by musk   at the company's starbase facility. but the test flight team did not deem conditions favorable for a landing attempt. "analogous to the fifth flight test, distinct vehicle and pad criteria must be met prior to a return and catch of the super heavy booster, which will require healthy systems on the booster and tower and a final manual command from the mission's flight director," according to spacex. "if this command is not sent prior to the completion of the boostback burn, or if automated health checks show unacceptable conditions with super heavy or the tower, the booster will default to a trajectory that takes it to a landing burn and soft splashdown in the gulf of mexico. we accept no compromises when it comes to ensuring the safety of the public and our team, and the return will only take place if conditions are right." the starship spacecraft, meanwhile, fired up its own six engines before entering a coasting phase as it soars through space. the capsule will briefly reignite its engines about half an hour later before bracing for reentry   the process by which it veers back into the thickest part of earth's atmosphere. during the fourth integrated starship test flight in early june, the spacecraft endured significant damage. the starship spacecraft shed numerous heat tiles designed to shield the vehicle from intense temperatures caused by the pressure and friction of reentry. "because of lost tiles ... the forward flaps were so melted it was like trying to control it with little skeleton hands," musk said after that mission, adding that the fourth flight landed roughly 6 miles (9.7 kilometers) away from its intended splashdown site in the indian ocean. spacex made significant strides, however, during starship's fifth integrated test flight in mid october. ahead of that mission, spacex implemented what it called a "complete rework of (starship's) heatshield, with spacex technicians spending more than 12,000 hours replacing the entire thermal protection system with newer generation tiles, a backup ablative layer, and additional protections between the flap structures." a successful test flight on tuesday could cue up spacex to begin tackling more ambitious projects, and it remains to be seen how the aborted attempt of the booster catch will factor in to those next steps. spacex has always said it would evaluate flight data and make a decision about a landing attempt based on real time flight data. "in 2025, spacex plans to undertake a long duration flight test and a propellant transfer flight test," according to a recent report from nasa's office of the inspector general, or oig. demonstrating the ability to launch a starship into orbit and then rendezvous the spacecraft with a tanker carrying fuel is considered essential to the success of nasa's artemis program. for the human moon landing mission, called artemis iii, starship may need to dock with more than a dozen fuel tankers before continuing its mission to the lunar surface. spacex will also face a "critical design review" for the artemis iii mission next summer, according to the oig. kristen holmes and ross levitt contributed.the cnn wire & 2024 cable news network, inc., a warner bros. discovery company. all rights reserved.

boeing starliner and spacex starship missions both achieved spaceflight milestones during the first week of june. boeing’s starliner overcame a series of technical problems including the malfunctioning of thrusters to dock at the international space station (iss). two nasa astronauts, butch wilmore and suni williams, opened the hatch of the spacecraft and boarded the outpost in orbit. spacex’s starship rocket, roughly 400 feet tall, successfully completed its first return from space with a landing in the ocean as planned. the company achieved a key set of ambitious goals on the fourth test flight of a vehicle central to elon musk’s vision of sending people to mars. despite both companies achieving extraordinary feats, i believe the two companies are quite different. i also believe the contrast will have long term consequences. spacex and boeing are titans in the commercial space industry, each with ambitious goals and significant contributions to space exploration. however, their philosophies and corporate cultures differ greatly. this post analyzes boeing and spacex across four key areas: engineering talent, vision, innovation, and execution. vision the spacex vision is driven by elon musk’s goal to colonize mars. spacex prioritizes rapid development and cost reduction in space travel, constantly pushing the boundaries of what’s possible. boeing: boeing’s vision focuses on near term commercial spaceflight opportunities and government contracts. while they have a long term outlook, it appears less revolutionary compared to spacex’s mars aspirations. engineering talent spacex aggressively recruits top engineers across various disciplines, valuing experience and problem solving skills. their focus on in house development fosters a unique engineering talent pool. in watching space launches by the two companies, a big difference i notice is enthusiasm. during each step of the launch, hundreds of young engineers are jumping up and down, clapping, yelling, and brimming with enthusiasm. boeing boasts a long history of aerospace engineering expertise. however, their size and established processes can lead to slower talent acquisition and a more siloed approach to engineering challenges. there is no crowd of engineers to be seen. innovation a hallmark of spacex is its commitment to disruptive innovation. they embrace risk taking to develop entirely new technologies, like reusable falcon 9 rockets and the starship spacecraft. inside the spacecraft, you see ipads and flat panels. boeing has a rich history of innovation, but recent years have seen a focus on incremental improvements to established technologies. their reliance on proven methods can hinder the adoption of groundbreaking ideas. inside the boeing spacecraft you see binders and paper tablets. execution spacex is known for its fast paced development cycles and aggressive timelines. they adapt to challenges and iterate on designs quickly. however, their rapid pace can raise safety concerns or lead to launch delays, but they have managed these issues well. nasa seems to have great confidence in them. boeing takes a more methodical approach to project execution, emphasizing thorough testing and adherence to safety protocols. this ensures a high degree of reliability but can lead to slower development times. recent controversies surrounding the boeing 737 max program raise questions about their execution capabilities. conclusion boeing and spacex represent contrasting approaches to space exploration. spacex excels in fostering a culture of innovation and rapid execution, aiming to revolutionize space travel. boeing leverages its vast experience and established processes to deliver reliable spacecraft but may be slower to adapt to emerging technologies. ultimately, their success hinges on balancing innovation with execution and adapting to the ever changing commercial space landscape. this post provides a general comparison; both companies have strengths and weaknesses within each category. both companies face intense competition from emerging players in the commercial space industry. i put my bets on spacex. note: i use gemini ai and other ai chatbots as my research assistants. ai can boost productivity for anyone who creates content. sometimes i get incorrect data from ai, and when something looks suspicious, i dig deeper. sometimes the data varies by sources where ai finds it. i take responsibility for my posts and if anyone spots an error, i will appreciate knowing it, and will correct it. about services blog contact privacy policy support disclaimer terms & conditions copyright © 2024. all rights reserved. copyright © 2024. all rights reserved.

starship is a two stage fully reusable super heavy lift launch vehicle under development by american aerospace company spacex. on 20 april 2023, with the first integrated flight test, starship became the most massive and most powerful vehicle ever to fly.[10] spacex has developed starship with the intention of lowering launch costs using economies of scale,[11] aiming to achieve this by reusing both rocket stages by "catching" them with the launch tower's systems, increasing payload mass to orbit, increasing launch frequency, mass manufacturing the rockets and adapting it to a wide range of space missions.[12][13] starship is the latest project in spacex's reusable launch system development program and plan to colonize mars. starship's two stages are the super heavy booster and the starship spacecraft. both stages are equipped with raptor engines, the first flown and mass produced full flow staged combustion cycle engines, which burn liquid methane (natural gas) and liquid oxygen. as of 2024,[update] starship is in development with an iterative and incremental approach, involving test flights of prototype vehicles. as a successor to spacex's falcon 9 and falcon heavy rockets, starship is intended to perform a wide range of space missions. for missions to further destinations, such as geosynchronous orbit, the moon, and mars, starship will rely on orbital refueling; a ship to ship propellant transfer demonstration is expected to occur in 2025.[14][15] spacex also plans other versions of the starship spacecraft, such as cargo (deploying spacex's second generation starlink satellite constellation) and human spaceflight (the human landing system variant will land astronauts on the moon as part of the artemis program, starting in 2027). when stacked and fully fueled, starship has a mass of approximately 5,000 t (11,000,000 lb),[c] a diameter of 9 m (30 ft)[17] and a height of 121.3 m (398 ft).[6] the rocket has been designed with the goal of being fully reusable to reduce launch costs;[18] it consists of the super heavy booster and the starship upper stage[19] which are powered by raptor and raptor vacuum engines.[20] the bodies of both rocket stages are made from stainless steel[21] and are manufactured by stacking and welding stainless steel cylinders.[22] these cylinders have a height of 1.8 m (5 ft 11 in), a thickness of 4 mm (0.16 in) and a mass of 1,600 kg (3,500 lb) each.[22] domes inside the spacecraft separate the methane and oxygen tanks.[22] spacex has stated that starship, in its "baseline reusable design", will have a payload capacity of 100 150 t (220,000 331,000 lb) to low earth orbit and 27 t (60,000 lb) to geostationary transfer orbit.[23][24] super heavy is 71 m (233 ft) tall, 9 m (30 ft) wide,[17] and is composed of four general sections: the engines, the oxygen tank, the fuel tank, and the interstage.[8] elon musk stated in 2021 that the final design will have a dry mass between 160 t (350,000 lb) and 200 t (440,000 lb), with the tanks weighing 80 t (180,000 lb) and the interstage 20 t (44,000 lb).[8] the propellant tanks on super heavy are separated by a common bulkhead, similar to the ones used on the s ii and s ivb stages on the saturn v rocket.[25][26] after starship's second flight test, the common dome's design was changed to a more elliptical dome,[27] which changed the propellant capacity of both tanks by an unknown, but likely negligible, amount.[27] both tanks are heavily reinforced, with roughly 74 stringers attached to the interior walls of the tanks.[28] the booster's tanks hold 3,400 t (7,500,000 lb) of propellant,[29] consisting of 2,700 t (6,000,000 lb) of liquid oxygen and 700 t (1,500,000 lb) of liquid methane.[d] the methane tank has a camera installed in the forward dome, enabling images of the tank's interior.[30] fuel is fed to the engines via a single downcomer, which terminates in a large distribution manifold above the engines.[31] the design of this manifold was changed when super heavy was upgraded from 29 engines to 33, with the more modern design featuring a dedicated methane sump instead of a direct distribution manifold.[32] the oxygen tank terminates with the thrust structure of the vehicle. while the outer 20 engines are mounted to the walls of the aft bay, the inner thirteen are mounted directly to the thrust puck, which is part of the aft dome.[32] a large steel structure is mounted at the bottom of the dome, reinforcing the thrust puck enough to enable its support of the inner thirteen engines, while also providing pathways for methane and oxygen to flow into the engines.[32] large slosh baffles were added in this region as well, beginning on booster 10.[27] these systems double as filters, preventing contaminants from damaging the engines.[33] a header tank is used to supply liquid oxygen during the landing burn for the inner thirteen engines.[31] on booster 15, the header tank has at least nine additional tanks attached, increasing total propellant supply during the landing burn.[33] these tanks may have been present on boosters 12, 13, and 14. however, this is unconfirmed.[34] as of november 2024, block 2 boosters are expected to have significantly larger header tanks, which may be used for the boostback burn in addition to the landing burn.[35] booster 5 was the only 29 engine booster to receive a header tank, which was mounted to the side of the oxygen tank.[32] it is unknown whether or not the top of this tank was ever completed, as a forward dome was never spotted during the assembly or scrapping of the vehicle.[32] the methane downcomer is partially contained within the header tank, as the methane sump is directly below it.[31] on booster 7 and all subsequent vehicles, four aerodynamic chines are located on the outside of the oxygen tank, providing aerodynamic lift during descent,[36] as well as housing batteries, composite overwrapped pressure vessels (copvs), and co2 tanks for fire suppression.[37] smaller copvs are used to ignite the engines.[37] on vehicles with hydraulic power units, the copv's dedicated to engine ignition, as well as the batteries, were located inside the hpu, instead of the chines.[37] super heavy is powered by 33 raptor engines housed within a dedicated shielding compartment.[38] this compartment is not present before engine installation, thus, boosters are roughly three meters shorter before engine installation.[39] the bottom of this shielding, as well as its inner walls, are protected by a dedicated thermal protection system.[38] the outer 20 engines, arranged in a single ring, are fixed.[38] to save weight, these engines are started using ground support equipment on the launch mount and cannot be reignited for subsequent burns.[40] the inner thirteen engines are attached to an adapter, which rests directly against the thrust puck/aft dome assembly.[38] these engines are equipped with gimbal actuators and reignite for the boostback and landing burns.[41] after starship's first flight test, this gimbaling system was switched from a hydraulic system to an electric one, enabling the removal of the hydraulic power units.[37] this change was made to the upper stage after the second flight test. during the ascent and boostback burns, the engines draw propellant from the main tanks, with the liquid oxygen being drawn from a dedicated header tank during the landing burn.[31] like the thrust vector control system, the engine shielding, which isolates individual engines in the event of a failure, was upgraded after starship's first flight test, alongside the fire suppression system.[37] this system uses co2 tanks to purge the individual engine compartments during flight, as well as a nitrogen purge while on the launch pad.[42] the aft bay has eighteen vents visible on the outside of the booster, which are believed to be connected to the outer 20 engines,[42] while the center engines vent directly below the launch pad.[42] the raptor engine uses a full flow staged combustion cycle with oxygen and methane rich turbopumps.[43][44] before 2014, only two full flow staged combustion rocket engine designs had advanced enough to undergo testing: the soviet rd 270 project in the 1960s and the aerojet rocketdyne integrated powerhead demonstrator in the mid 2000s.[45] to improve performance, the engines burn super cooled propellant.[46] the block 1 version of the booster (used through november 2024) produces a total of 73.5 mn (16,500,000 lbf)[47] just over twice that of the saturn v first stage,[48] with this total being expected to increase to 80.8 mn (18,200,000 lbf) for block 2 boosters and later up to 98.1 mn (22,100,000 lbf) with the block 3 vehicle.[49] these later versions may have up to 35 engines.[50] the combined plume of the engines produces large shock diamonds in the exhaust during the ascent burn.[51] during unpowered flight in the upper atmosphere, control authority is provided by cold gas thrusters fed with residual ullage gas.[37][27] four perpendicular vents are located within the interstage, placed at a 45 degree angle from the hardpoints.[37] additionally, four "cowbell" vents are located just below the common dome, which point down towards the engines, though at a slight angle.[37] the interstage is equipped with four electrically actuated grid fins made of stainless steel, each with a mass of roughly 3 t (6,600 lb).[52] these grid fins are paired together, with the fins in each pair being 60 degrees apart from each other, differing from the falcon 9 booster, which has titanium grid fins mounted 90 degrees from each other.[53][54] this is done to improve control in the pitch axis.[54] the fins remain extended during ascent to save weight,[8] though this results in mild warping during stage separation.[55] the interstage also has protruding hardpoints, located between grid fins, allowing the booster to be lifted or caught by the launch tower.[56] the ability to lift a booster from these hardpoints was proven on august 23, 2022, when booster 7 was lifted onto olm a.[57] the first catch of a booster occurred on october 13, 2024, using booster 12.[58] after the first starship test flight, all boosters have an additional 1.8 m[59] tall vented interstage to enable hot staging.[60] during hot staging, super heavy shuts down all but the 3 center engines,[61][62] while the second stage fires its engines before separating, thus the second stage "pushes off" from the first stage giving added thrust.[61] the vented interstage contains a dome to shield the top of super heavy from the second stage's engines.[60][62] elon musk in 2023 claimed that this change might result in a 10% increase in the payload to low earth orbit.[62] beginning with booster 11, the vented interstage is jettisoned after completion of the boostback burn, to reduce mass during descent.[63] as of june 2024, spacex does not intend to jettison the interstage when flying block 2 and block 3 boosters, as the vented section will be directly integrated into the vehicle.[63] the block 2 version of starship is 52.1 m (171 ft) tall, 9 m (30 ft) wide,[64] and is composed of four general sections: the engine bay, the oxygen tank, the fuel tank, and the payload bay.[8] the retired block 1 was constructed in a similar manner, though it was only 50.3 m (165 ft) tall. elon musk stated in 2021 that the vehicle has a dry mass of roughly 100 t (220,000 lb).[8] the windward side is protected by a heat shield, which is composed of eighteen thousand[65][66] hexagonal black tiles that can withstand temperatures of 1,400 °c (2,600 °f).[67][68] it is designed to protect the vehicle during atmospheric entry and to be used multiple times with minimal maintenance between flights.[69] the silica based tiles are attached to starship with pins,[68] and have small gaps in between to allow for heat expansion.[70][8] after ift 4, spacex added a secondary ablative layer under the primary heat shield,[71] though this was only added to the flaps of the ift 6 vehicle.[72] this ablative layer is likely composed of pyron, which is similar in composition to carbon composites.[73] the total mass of the heat shield and ablative layer of a block 1 ship is 10.5 t (23,000 lb).[74] the propellant tanks on starship are separated by a common bulkhead, similar to the ones used on the s ii and s ivb stages on the saturn v rocket.[25][75] while block 2 vehicles use an elliptical dome,[76] the common and forward domes of the block 1 design were more conical.[77] both tanks are heavily reinforced, with roughly 30 and 48 stringers attached to the interior walls of the methane and oxygen tanks, respectively.[76] block 1 vehicles lacked any reinforcement to the methane tank,[76] and the oxygen tank only had 24 stringers.[27] the vehicle's tanks hold 1,500 t (3,300,000 lb) of propellant,[64] consisting of 1,170 t (2,580,000 lb) of liquid oxygen and 330 t (730,000 lb) of liquid methane.[e] running along the sides of the tanks are the "raceways", which support the transfer of pressurization gas and electricity throughout the vehicle.[76] beginning with block 2 vehicles, these are covered by dedicated aerocovers.[76] the methane tank has a camera installed in the forward dome, enabling images of the interior of the tank.[78] there are three baffles located inside the tank to prevent sloshing of the propellant during flight.[76] fuel is fed to the engines via four downcomers, with three smaller downcomers feeding the vacuum raptors/rvacs and the central downcomer feeding the inner three engines.[79] the central downcomer connects to a large sump, instead of directly to the methane tank itself.[76] the original design only featured a single downcomer, which terminated in a distribution manifold, directing propellant to the three sea level engines and the individual rvacs.[80] inside this tank are two additional downcomers, which provide oxygen and methane to the central three engines from the header tanks.[80] the lox downcomer extends into the lox tank, with a small expanded portion of unknown purpose.[27] a camera is located on the walls of the tank, near the flight termination system.[72] like the methane tank, the oxygen tank also has three baffles to prevent sloshing.[76] the oxygen tank terminates with the thrust structure of the vehicle.[80] the rvacs are mounted directly to the aft dome, which has reinforcements mounted inside of the tank.[80] the three sea level engines are mounted on the thrust puck, which forms the bottom of the aft dome.[80] a conical steel structure is mounted inside the bottom of the dome, reinforcing the thrust puck enough to enable its support of the inner three engines, while also providing pathways for methane and oxygen to flow into the engines.[80] the outer wall of the aft dome is covered in an insulation material, presumably to prevent frost from building up inside the engine bay during propellant load.[81] the propellant lines on the vehicles are all vacuum jacketed,[76] reducing boiloff while in orbit.[82] block 1 vehicles used more conventional insulation, though only on the header tank's propellant lines.[76] starship is powered by 6 raptor engines, which are housed within a dedicated shielding compartment.[38] this compartment is present before engine installation, and contains several critical systems.[81] these includes some of the motors for the aft flaps, the quick disconnect interface, and at least one battery.[81] a camera is mounted inside of this bay, enabling images of the engines during flight.[81][78] until starship flight test 3, this section held the hydraulic power unit, which provided the three sea level engines with thrust vector control capability.[81] the first block 1 vehicle, s20, had multiple composite overwrapped pressure vessels (copvs) mounted in this region as well.[81] these components are all protected by the engine shielding.[83] the 3 rvacs, which are arranged in a single ring, are in a fixed position.[81] an additional three rvacs will be added to the block 3 ship design.[64] the inner three engines are attached to an adapter, which rests directly against the thrust puck/aft dome assembly.[38] these engines are equipped with gimbal actuators, and reignite for the landing burns.[73] after starship's second flight test, this gimbaling system was switched from a hydraulic system to an electric one, enabling the removal of the hydraulic power units.[27] this change was made to the booster after the first flight test.[37] during the ascent burn burns, the engines draw propellant from the main tanks, with all subsequent burns drawing propellant from dedicated header tanks.[31] the engine shielding, which isolates individual engines in the event of a failure, was upgraded after starship's first flight test, alongside the fire suppression system.[37] this system uses co2 tanks to purge the individual engine compartments during flight, as well as a nitrogen purge while on the launch pad.[42] there are ten vents in the aft bay for preventing an overpressure in the engine shielding compartment.[84] beginning with s25,[37] the block 1 design had between 14 and 16 such vents.[84][37] the raptor engine uses a full flow staged combustion cycle, which has both oxygen and methane rich turbopumps.[85][86] before 2014, only two full flow staged combustion rocket engine designs had advanced enough to undergo testing: the soviet rd 270 project in the 1960s and the aerojet rocketdyne integrated powerhead demonstrator in the mid 2000s.[87] to improve performance, the engines burn super cooled propellant.[88] the block 1 version of the ship (used through november 2024) produces a total of 12.25 mn (2,750,000 lbf)[64] almost triple the thrust of the saturn v second stage, with this total being expected to increase to 15.69 mn (3,530,000 lbf) for block 2 boosters and later up to 26.48 mn (5,950,000 lbf) with the block 3 vehicle.[64] during unpowered flight in orbit, control authority is provided by cold gas thrusters fed with residual ullage gas.[37][27] four of these thrusters are located on the methane tank.[76] another four are located just below the payload bay,[76] and two on the oxygen tank.[76] near the top of the nosecone, there are four vents connected to the header tanks, as well as two others located on the tip of the payload bay.[89] in the aft bay, two engine chill lines double as thrusters near the base of the vehicle.[84] finally, three large liquid oxygen (lox) vents are located in the aft bay of the vehicle, enabling the ship to dump lox as needed.[84] for block 1 ships, these vents terminated in a singular large nozzle, with block 2 vehicles, each vent splits into two smaller nozzles.[84] the payload bay hosts the nosecone, header tanks, forward flaps, multiple copvs, and the "pez dispenser". the header tanks provide propellant for all burns after seco, and are mounted at the tip of the payload bay.[90] these tanks only connect to the sea level engines.[76] the lox header tank forms the top of the nosecone, with the methane header tank attached directly below it.[80] these tanks terminate in a conical sump, which are attached to the downcomers.[90][80] block 1 vehicles lacked this sump, reducing propellant capacity.[90] fourteen copv's are mounted in the space around the methane header tank, providing the startup gas for the engines,[91] as well as six near the pez dispenser.[89] the nosecone has substantial internal reinforcement, mainly around the forward flap attachment points and lifting points for the chopsticks.[89] the number of internal stringers was increased between block 1 and block 2 vehicles.[89] additional reinforcements are used to support the pez dispenser on ships equipped with one.[89] located along the sides of the nosecone are two starlink antennas.[72] another two are placed at the bottom of the payload bay.[72] these allow communication with the ship during reenty.[92] the pez dispenser is used to deploy starlink satellites into leo.[93] it was first added to s24, though it was permanently sealed until flight 3. it consists of the dispenser mechanism and the door.[93] the door is actuated, folding up into the payload bay to open, and lowering to close.[93] its approximately 0.8 m (2 ft 7 in) tall and 7.3 m (24 ft) wide.[93] in order to account for the door, significant structural reinforcements are added around it.[27] during assembly, additional reinforcements are added to the door.[93] the door has substantial reinforcements added to its interior, helping prevent deformation.[93] the door is capable of maintaining a seal during flight, so long as it is not opened.[93] the dispenser itself is mounted directly to the forward dome.[93] it has a truss structure for its base, with solid steel used elsewhere.[93] a mobile track is used in the base, enabling the dispenser to push the satellite out of the vehicle.[93] after dispensing a satellite, the next payload is lowered onto the base, and is deployed.[93] the opposite occurs during loading, with the dispenser raising its payloads to receive another satellite.[93] in order to prevent the satellite from floating out of the mechanism during zero g operations, the dispenser locks the satellites in position using a "retention frame". this is lowered alongside the satellites during operation.[93] on block 1 vehicles, beginning with s24, the dispenser was made from stainless steel, with spacex potentially changing this to aluminum on block 2.[94] starship controls its reentry with four flaps, two aft flaps mounted to the sides of the engine bay and lox tank and two forward flaps on the payload bay.[27] significant structural reinforcement is added to the flap attachement point and within the flaps themselves.[89] according to spacex, the flaps replace the need for wings or tailplane, reduce the fuel needed for landing, and allow landing at destinations in the solar system where runways do not exist (for example, mars). the flap's hinges are sealed in aerocovers because they would otherwise be easily damaged during reentry.[8] despite this, damage to the forward flaps was observed on flights four,[95] five,[73] and six,[96][89] with near complete loss occurring on flight 4.[97] beginning with block 2, the design of these forward flaps was significantly changed, becoming thinner and angled.[77] this sets them at an approximately 140 degree angle between the forward flaps, compared to the 180 degrees of the aft flaps.[89] on block 1 vehicles, the forward flaps were also parallel to each other.[89] this change was made to prevent the damage observed on the last three flights of the block 1 ship.[91][89] there are two cameras located at the bottom of the flaps, with another providing images of the flap itself.[72] both sets of flaps feature cameras in their hinges as well.[72] all four flaps have small static wicks, which enable the vehicle to discharge static electricity in flight.[27] raptor is a family of rocket engines developed by spacex for use in starship and super heavy vehicles. it burns liquid oxygen and methane in an efficient and complex full flow staged combustion power cycle. the raptor engine uses methane as fuel rather than kerosene because methane gives higher performance and prevents the build up of deposits in the engine from coking.[98][99] methane can also be produced from carbon dioxide and water using the sabatier reaction.[100] the engines are designed to be reused many times with little maintenance.[101] raptor operates with an oxygen to methane mixture ratio of about 3.6:1, lower than the stoichiometric mixture ratio of 4:1 necessary for complete combustion, since operating at higher temperatures would melt the engine.[8] the propellants leave the pre burners and get injected into the main combustion chamber as hot gases instead of liquid droplets, enabling a higher power density as the propellants mix rapidly via diffusion.[98] the methane and oxygen are at high enough temperatures and pressures that they ignite on contact, eliminating the need for igniters in the main combustion chamber.[102] the engine structure itself is mostly aluminum, copper, and steel; oxidizer side turbopumps and manifolds subject to corrosive oxygen rich flames are made of an inconel like sx500 superalloy.[102] some components are 3d printed.[103] a raptor 2 engine produces 2.3 mn (520,000 lbf) at a specific impulse of 327 seconds (3.21 km/s) at sea level and 350 seconds (3.4 km/s) in a vacuum.[102] raptor vacuum, used on the starship upper stage, is modified with a regeneratively cooled nozzle extension made of brazed steel tubes, increasing its expansion ratio to about 90 and its specific impulse in vacuum to 380 seconds (3.7 km/s).[8] the main combustion chamber operates at a pressure of 350 bar (5,100 psi) exceeding that of any prior operational rocket engine.[98] the raptor's gimbaling range is 15°, higher than the rs 25's 12.5° and the merlin's 5°. spacex has stated they aim to achieve a per unit production cost of us$250,000 upon starting mass production.[102] on 4 april 2024, elon musk provided an update on starship at starbase, where two new versions of starship were announced, block 2 and block 3.[104][105] block 1 upper stage vehicles have been retired but were used for the first 6 flight tests.[106][107] as of january 2025, block 1 boosters are still being used.[3] block 2 upper stage vehicles feature a thinner forward flap design, its flaps are positioned more leeward, a 25% increase in propellant capacity, integrated vented interstage, redesigned avionics,[108] two "raceways",[109] and an increase in thrust.[110][111] the integrated vehicle will be a total of 3.1 m (10 ft) taller than the previous block 1 vehicle and is planned to have a payload capacity of at least 100 tons to orbit when reused.[110] additionally, block 2 vehicles will use raptor 3, removing the need for secondary engine shielding.[112] however, the first block 2 vehicle, s33, received upgraded raptor 2 engines,[113] with an unknown increase in thrust.[114] initial block 2 upper stage vehicles will use a block 1 booster.[115] the block 2 ship first flew on the seventh flight test.[116] as of june 2024,[update] the block 3 final configuration is unknown. the most recent configuration, as described in regulatory filings submitted to the faa, has a height of 150 m (490 ft).[50] the starship second stage will feature 9 raptor engines, while the super heavy booster will have up to 35.[50] it is planned to have a payload capacity of at least 200 tons to orbit when reused.[117] payloads will be integrated into starship at a separate facility and then rolled out to the launch site.[118] super heavy and starship are then to be stacked onto their launch mount and loaded with fuel via the ship quick disconnect (sqd) arm and booster quick disconnect (bqd).[56] the sqd and bqd retract, all 33 engines of super heavy ignite, and the rocket lifts off.[56] at approximately 159 seconds after launch[119] at an altitude of roughly 64 km (40 mi), super heavy cuts off all but three of its center gimbaling rocket engines.[120]: 58 starship then ignites its engines while still attached to the booster, and separates.[61] during hot staging, the booster throttles down its engines.[61] the booster then rotates, before igniting ten additional engines for a "boostback burn"[121] which stops all forward velocity. after the boostback burn, the booster's engines shut off with super heavy on a trajectory for a controlled descent to the launch site using its grid fins for minor course corrections. roughly six minutes after launch, shortly before landing,[122] it ignites its inner 13 engines, then shuts off all but the inner 3,[123] to perform a landing burn which slows it sufficiently to be caught by a pair of hydraulic actuating arms attached to the launch tower.[124][125] the booster landing and catch was successfully demonstrated for the first time on 13 october 2024, with the landing of booster 12.[126][127] meanwhile, the starship spacecraft continues accelerating to orbital velocity with its six raptor engines.[128] once in orbit, the spacecraft is planned to be able to be refueled by another starship tanker variant.[129] musk has estimated that 8 launches would be needed to refuel a starship in low earth orbit completely.[130] nasa has estimated that 16 launches in short succession (due to cryogenic propellant boil off) would be needed to refuel starship for one lunar landing partially.[131] to land on bodies without an atmosphere, such as the moon, starship will fire its engines to slow down.[132] to land on bodies with an atmosphere, such as the earth and mars, starship first slows by entering the atmosphere using a heat shield.[18] the spacecraft would then perform a "belly flop" maneuver by diving through the atmosphere at a 60° angle to the ground,[133] controlling its fall using four flaps at the front and aft of the spacecraft.[134] shortly before landing, the raptor engines fire,[134] using fuel from the header tanks,[135] to perform a "landing flip" maneuver to return to a vertical orientation, with the raptor engines' gimbaling helping to maneuver the craft.[134] the hls and depot cannot reenter the atmosphere, as they lack a thermal protection system. if starship's second stage lands on a pad, a mobile hydraulic lift will move it to a transporter vehicle. if it lands on a floating platform, it will be transported by a barge to a port and then transported by road. the recovered starship will either be positioned on the launch mount for another launch or refurbished at a spacex facility.[118]: 22 in november 2005,[136] before spacex had launched its first rocket the falcon 1,[137] ceo elon musk first mentioned a high capacity rocket concept able to launch 100 t (220,000 lb) to low earth orbit, dubbed the bfr.[136] later in 2012, elon musk first publicly announced plans to develop a rocket surpassing the capabilities of space x's existing falcon 9.[138] spacex called it the mars colonial transporter, as the rocket was to transport humans to mars and back.[139] in 2016, the descriptor was changed to interplanetary transport system, as the rocket was planned to travel beyond mars as well.[140] the conceptual design called for a carbon fiber structure,[141] a mass in excess of 10,000 t (22,000,000 lb) when fully fueled, a payload of 300 t (660,000 lb) to low earth orbit while being fully reusable.[141] by 2017, the concept was again re dubbed the bfr.[142] in december 2018, the structural material was changed from carbon composites[143][141] to stainless steel,[144][145] marking the transition from early design concepts of the starship.[144][133][146] musk cited numerous reasons for the change of material; low cost and ease of manufacture, increased strength of stainless steel at cryogenic temperatures, as well as its ability to withstand high heat.[147][133] in 2019, spacex began to refer to the entire vehicle as starship, with the second stage also being called starship, and the booster super heavy.[148][149][150] they also announced that starship would use reusable heat shield tiles similar to those of the space shuttle.[151][152] the second stage design had also settled on six raptor engines by 2019: three optimized for sea level and three optimized for vacuum.[153][154] in 2019 spacex announced a change to the second stage's design, reducing the number of aft flaps from three to two to reduce weight.[155] in march 2020 spacex released a starship users guide, in which they stated the payload of starship to leo would be over 100 t (220,000 lb), with a payload to gto of 21 t (46,000 lb).[23] the first tests started with the construction of the first prototype in 2018, starhopper, which performed several static fires and two successful low altitude flights in 2019.[156] spacex began constructing the first full size starship mk1 and mk2 upper stage prototypes before 2019, at the spacex facilities in boca chica, texas, and cocoa, florida, respectively.[157] neither prototype flew: mk1 was destroyed in november 2019 during a pressure stress test and mk2's florida facility was deconstructed throughout 2020.[158][70] prototypes were built using 301 stainless steel.[159] this was noted for its corrosion resistance and lower cost compared to carbon fiber but faced some challenges, particularly with interlaminar toughness at cryogenic temperatures. spacex then began naming its new starship upper stage prototypes with the prefix "sn", short for "serial number".[160] no prototypes between sn1 and sn4 flew either sn1 and sn3 collapsed during pressure stress tests, and sn4 exploded after its fifth engine firing.[161] in june 2020, spacex started constructing a launch pad for orbital starship flights.[56] the first flight capable prototype, sn5, was cylindrical as it had no flaps or nose cone: just one raptor engine, fuel tanks, and a mass simulator.[162] on 5 august 2020, sn5 performed a 150 m (500 ft) high flight and successfully landed on a nearby pad.[163] on 3 september 2020, the similar looking starship sn6 repeated the hop;[164] later that month, a raptor vacuum engine underwent its first full duration firing at mcgregor, texas.[165] starship sn8 was the first full sized upper stage prototype, though it lacked a heat shield.[166] it underwent four preliminary static fire tests between october and november 2020.[161] on 9 december 2020, sn8 flew, slowly turning off its three engines one by one, and reached an altitude of 12.5 km (7.8 mi). after sn8 dove back to the ground, its engines were hampered by low methane header tank pressure during the landing attempt, which led to a hard impact on the landing pad and subsequent explosion of the vehicle.[134] sn7 used 304l stainless steel, which is less brittle and more weldable.[167] later vehicles used a proprietary alloy, 30x, whose composition is proprietary that costs slightly over €3.6/kg.[168] because spacex had violated its launch license and ignored warnings of worsening shock wave damage, the federal aviation administration investigated the incident for two months.[169] during the sn8 launch, spacex ignored faa warnings that the flight profile posed a risk of explosion.[169][170][171] faa space division chief wayne monteith said spacex's violation was “inconsistent with a strong safety culture”, and criticized the company for proceeding with the launch "based on 'impressions' and 'assumptions,' rather than procedural checks and positive affirmations".[169] on 2 february 2021, starship sn9 launched to 10 km (6.2 mi) in a flight path similar to sn8. the prototype crashed upon landing because one engine did not ignite properly.[172] a month later, on 3 march, starship sn10 launched on the same flight path as sn9.[173] the vehicle landed hard and crushed its landing legs, leaning to one side.[174] a fire was seen at the vehicle's base and it exploded less than ten minutes later,[175] potentially due to a propellant tank rupture.[174] on 30 march, starship sn11 flew into thick fog along the same flight path.[176] the vehicle exploded during descent,[176] possibly due to excess propellant in a raptor's methane turbopump.[177] in march 2021, the company disclosed a public construction plan for two sub orbital launch pads, two orbital launch pads, two landing pads, two test stands, and a large propellant tank farm.[178] the company soon proposed developing the surrounding boca chica village, texas, into a company town named starbase.[178] locals raised concerns about spacex's authority, power, and a potential threat for eviction through eminent domain.[179] in early april, the orbital launch pad's fuel storage tanks began mounting.[56] sn12 through sn14 were scrapped before completion; sn15 was selected to fly instead,[180] due to improved avionics, structure, and engines.[175] on 5 may 2021, sn15 launched, completed the same maneuvers as older prototypes, and landed safely.[180] sn15 had a fire in the engine area after landing but it was extinguished.[175] according to a later report by spacex, sn15 experienced several issues while landing, including the loss of tank pressure and an engine.[181]: 2 in june 2022, the federal aviation administration determined that spacex must address more than 75 issues identified in the preliminary environmental assessment before integrated flight tests could start.[182] in july 2022, booster 7 tested the liquid oxygen turbopumps on all 33 raptor engines, resulting in an explosion at the vehicle's base, which destroyed a pressure pipe and caused minor damage to the launchpad.[183] by the end of november, ship 24 had performed 2 static test fires,[184]: 20 while booster 7 had performed 6 static test fires[185][184]: 20 and finally on 9 february 2023, a static fire with 31 engines at 50% throttle.[186] in january 2023, the whole starship stack underwent a full wet dress rehearsal.[187] after a launch attempt aborted on 17 april 2023,[188] booster 7 and ship 24 lifted off on 20 april at 13:33 utc in the first orbital flight test.[189] three engines were disabled during the launch sequence and several more failed during the flight.[190] the booster later lost thrust vectoring control of the raptor engines, which led to the rocket spinning out of control.[190] the vehicle reached a maximum altitude of 24 mi (39 km).[191] approximately 3 minutes after lift off the rocket's autonomous flight termination system was activated, though the vehicle tumbled for another 40 seconds before disintegrating.[192][193][194] the first flight test blasted large amounts of sand and soil in the air, reaching communities within a 10.7 km (6.6 mi) radius.[195][196][197] a brushfire on nearby state parkland also occurred, burning 3.5 acres of state parkland.[198] after the first test flight, spacex began work on the launch mount to repair the damage it sustained during the test and to prevent future issues. the foundation of the launch tower was reinforced and a water powered flame deflector was built under the launch mount.[199] ship 25 and booster 9 were rolled to the suborbital and orbital launch sites in may to undergo multiple tests.[200][201] on 18 november 2023, booster 9 and ship 25 lifted off the pad.[202] all 33 engines continued to function until staging, where the second stage separated by pushing itself away from the first stage using a hot staging technique.[121] following separation, the super heavy booster completed its flip maneuver and initiated the boostback burn before exploding following multiple successive engine failures.[121][203][204] three and a half minutes into the flight at an altitude of ~90 km over the gulf of mexico, blockage in a liquid oxygen filter caused one of the engines to fail in a way that resulted in the destruction of the booster.[205] the second stage continued until it reached an altitude of ~149 kilometres (93 mi), after over eight minutes of flight; before engine cutoff, telemetry was lost on the second stage.[121] spacex said that a safe command based on flight performance data triggered the flight termination system and destroyed the second stage,[121] before achieving its planned orbit or attempting re entry.[206] it appeared to re enter a few hundred miles north of the virgin islands, according to noaa weather radar data.[207] following the second flight test (which saw the loss of both stages), significant changes were implemented, including upgrading starship's thrust vector control system to electric thrust vector control (tvc)[208] and measures to delay liquid oxygen (lox)[208] venting until after starship engine cutoff (seco) has taken place. flight 3 launched from the spacex starbase facility along the south texas coast around 8:25 cdt on 14 march 2024, coincidentally the 22nd anniversary of its founding.[209][210] like ift 2, all 33 engines on the booster ignited and stage separation was successful.[211] b10 conducted a boostback burn, however, the planned landing in the gulf of mexico was not successful, as it exploded at 462 m (1,516 ft) above the surface.[123] the starship spacecraft itself   after reaching space and orbital velocity   conducted several tests after engine cutoff, including initiating a propellant transfer demo and payload dispenser test.[212][213] it attempted to re enter the atmosphere,[123][214] and at an altitude of around 65 km (40 mi), all telemetry from ship 28 stopped, indicating a loss of the vehicle.[215] this flight test demonstrated a cryogenic propellant transfer, by transferring propellant from the ship's header tanks into its main tanks while in space, a technology which is required for starship hls to exit low earth orbit (leo). the result of this test was declared successful by nasa and spacex. additional data analysis is occurring on the fluid dynamics such as slosh and boil off of the propellant.[216][217][218] the fourth flight test of the full starship configuration launched on 6 june 2024, at 7:50 am cdt.[219] the goals for the test flight were for the super heavy booster to land on a 'virtual tower' in the ocean, and for the ship to survive peak heating during atmospheric reentry.[117] the flight test was successful in both regards, with super heavy achieving a soft splashdown and ship surviving atmospheric reentry and a controlled splashdown.[220] in april 2024, musk stated one of the goals was to attempt a booster tower landing based on successful booster performance in flight 4. vehicle testing commenced in may 2024.[221] spacex claimed that b12 and s30 were ready to launch in early august, in advance of regulatory approval.[222] spacex flew s30 and b12 on 13 october 2024, with b12 returning to the launch site for a successful catch for the first time, and s30 successfully splashing down in the indian ocean.[223] ship 31 completed a successful cryogenic test in july 2024 and a static fire in september.[224][225] booster 13 completed similar tests in april and october.[226] flight 6 was flown on 19 november 2024, with a water landing of the booster rather than a catch.[227] flight 6 was the first to successfully conduct a raptor engine relight in the vacuum of space, paving the way for payload deployments on future flights.[227] a stuffed toy banana served as the zero g indicator, becoming starship's first payload, though it remained within the vehicle for the duration of the flight.[227] eric berger claimed that due to the success of the in space relight, starship would likely be "cleared to travel into orbit".[228] ship 33 completed a successful cryogenic test in october 2024[229] and a static fire in late december.[230][231] its counterpart, booster 14, also underwent cryogenic testing in october.[232] booster 14 rolled out to olp 1 and conducted a successful spin prime test and static fire in early december.[233] flight 7 was flown on 16 january 2025, the mission profile for flight test 7 was expected to be similar to the previous launch, targeting a splashdown in the indian ocean after attempting an in space engine relight. ship 33 was also expected to deploy ten starlink "simulators," which were also expected to reenter over the indian ocean.[234] contact with ship 33 was lost shortly before its engines were scheduled to shut down.[235] subsequently, ship 33 was seen exploding as it flew over the turks and caicos islands. the booster successfully returned to the launch site and was caught by the chopsticks on olp a.[235] as a result of the explosion, numerous commercial airline flights were diverted or delayed.[236][237] spacex develops the starship primarily with private funding.[238][150][1] spacex chief financial officer bret johnsen disclosed in court that spacex has invested more than $3 billion into the starbase facility and starship systems from july 2014 to may 2023.[1] elon musk stated in april 2023 that spacex expected to spend about $2 billion on starship development in 2023.[239][240] in a 2024 response to a lawsuit, spacex stated that the cost of the starship program was approximately $4 million per day.[241]: 25 26 adding that any day of delay to the starship program represented a loss of $100,000.[241]: 25 26 musk has theorized that a starship orbital launch might eventually cost spacex only $1 million to launch.[242] eurospace's director of research pierre lionnet stated in 2022 that starship's launch price to customers would likely be higher because of the rocket's development cost.[243] as part of the development of the human landing system for the artemis program, spacex was awarded in april 2021 a $2.89 billion fixed price contract from nasa to develop the starship lunar lander for artemis iii.[244][245] blue origin, a bidding competitor to spacex, disputed the decision and began a legal case against nasa and spacex in august 2021, causing nasa to suspend the contract for three months until the case was dismissed in the court of federal claims.[246][247][248] two years later blue origin was awarded a $3.4 billion fixed price contract for its lunar lander.[249] in 2022, nasa awarded spacex a $1.15 billion fixed price contract for a second lunar lander for artemis iv.[245] the same year, spacex was awarded a $102 million five year contract to develop the rocket cargo program for the united states space force.[250] starship vehicles have been launched 7 times, resulting in 4 successes (57.14%), and 3 failures. starship block 1 was launched six times between april 2023 and november 2024, with the ship retired ahead of the seventh flight.[251] block 1 boosters are expected to fly further into the future.[252] spacex plans to use starship to launch the second generation of satellites for spacex's starlink system, which currently delivers high speed internet to over 70 countries.[253] an analyst at financial services company morgan stanley stated development of starship and starlink are intertwined, with starship's planned launch capacity enabling cheaper starlink launches, and starlink's profits financing starship's development costs.[254] in deficit from its inception until the end of 2022,[255] starlink was first reported to be cash flow positive in the first quarter of 2023,[256][257] though elon musk said that starlink had only reached "break even cashflow" in 2023.[258] in december 2023, the fcc issued a final denial of a $885m starlink rdof subsidy because of starlink's "continuing inability to successfully launch on the starship rocket".[259] starship hls was initially chosen by nasa as the sole lunar human landing system for the planned artemis iii and artemis iv crewed missions, as part of the artemis program.[260][261] starship hls is to be launched into a low earth orbit, and refueled by multiple starship tanker spacecraft.[262]: 4, 5 once fueled, it would perform a trans lunar injection burn and enter a near rectilinear halo orbit[263] around the moon, with a perilune of 1,500 km (930 mi) occurring over the north pole and an apolune of 70,000 km (43,000 mi) occurring over the south pole.[263][262]: 4, 5 the orion spacecraft would then dock with starship hls and two of its four crew would transfer into starship hls.[264][262]: 4, 5 starship hls would then use its engines to make a powered descent and land near the lunar south pole.[262]: 4, 5 after the crew performs the surface portion of its mission, the hls would ascend with the crew.[262]: 4, 5 the crew would then transfer into the orion spacecraft and return to earth.[262]: 4, 5 astronomers have called to consider starship's larger mass to orbit and wider cargo bay for proposed space telescopes such as luvoir, and to develop larger telescopes to take advantage of these capabilities.[265][266] starship's 9 m (30 ft) fairing width could hold an 8 m (26 ft) wide space telescope mirror in a single piece,[265] alleviating the need for complex unfolding such as that of the jwst's 6.5 m (21 ft) mirror, which added cost and delays.[266] ariane 5 imposed a ~6,500 kg limit on the telescope's weight.[267] starship's low launch cost could also allow probes to use heavier, more common, cheaper materials, such as glass instead of beryllium for large telescope mirrors.[266][243] with a 5 t (11,000 lb) mirror built using similar methods to the hubble space telescope's mirror, the jwst would represent only 10% of the mass deliverable by a (refueled) starship to the sun earth l2 point, and therefore minimizing the weight of the telescope would not have been a dominant design consideration.[266] the national academies of science's 2020 survey recommended the habitable worlds observatory (hwo); the space observatory, requiring a super heavy lift launch vehicle, will search for signs of life on exoplanets.[267] the hwo's team hopes for the success of big launchers due to their critical importance to the hwo's mission.[267] lee feinberg, nasa hwo lead architect[267] and jwst manager,[268] stays in communication with spacex to track starship's progress and has visited them in 2024 for that same purpose.[267] the nasa habitable worlds observatory will have a 6 8 meter mirror for now, but its design should be flexible to leverage launchers with potentially double the mass and volume by the time it launches in the 2040s.[267] former nasa jpl architect casey handmer believes the hwo to be far too conservative compared to what is possible with starship.[267] handmer argues that starship enables telescopes to scale up to the point of surface level exoplanet imaging, perhaps big enough to detect seasonal migration patterns.[267] in january 2022, spacex was awarded a $102 million five year contract to develop the rocket cargo program for the united states space force.[250] the five year contract is intended to "determine exactly what a rocket can achieve when used for cargo transport",[269] and will see the air force research laboratory collect data during commercial launches of starship.[269] the contract includes an eventual demonstration mission with the launch and landing of a cargo laden starship in a point to point flight. the department of defense has planned a test with starship as part of its program to demonstrate the ability to rapidly deploy up to 100 tons of cargo and supplies, a capability it calls point to point delivery (p2pd). the test is envisioned to take place in fy25 or fy26.[270] in 2024, the nasa esa mars sample return project, one of nasa's highest priority flagship projects, suffered a setback when an independent review board assessing the project's feasibility concluded that the project could not be completed under its mission profile. in april 2024, the administrator of nasa then announced that a new mission profile was needed for the project and that nasa would turn to industry for proposals, with responses due in fall 2024, and a high emphasis on lower total cost and lower risk.[271] starship was widely seen as a leading candidate to serve as a central component of the new mission profile architecture.[272][273][274] spacex has proposed using starship for point to point flights (called "earth to earth" flights by spacex), traveling anywhere on earth in under an hour.[275][269] musk stated that spacex would complete hundreds of cargo flights before launching with human passengers.[276] according to spacex, the design of starship is driven by its requirement to be able to land crews on mars,[277]: 120 though spacex has not published technical plans or designs about starship's life support systems, radiation protection, docking system, or in orbit refueling system for mars.[278] the spacecraft would be launched to low earth orbit and refueled in orbit before heading to mars.[279] after landing on mars, the sabatier reaction could be used to synthesize liquid methane and liquid oxygen, starship's fuel, in a power to gas plant.[280] the plant's raw resources would be martian water and martian carbon dioxide.[100] on earth, similar technologies could be used to make carbon neutral propellant for the rocket.[281] to date, there has been one proof of concept experiment (moxie) demonstrating the extraction of oxygen from martian carbon dioxide, with george dvorsky writing for gizmodo commenting that we are not "remotely close" to turning this "into something practical".[282][283] spacex and musk have stated their goal of colonizing mars to ensure the long term survival of humanity,[243][284] with an ambition of having sent one million people to mars by 2050.[285] in march 2022, he estimated that the first crewed mars landing could occur in 2029.[286] this timeline has been criticized as unrealistic by kevin olsen, a physicist at the university of oxford, england, who has said that "colony needs to become a factory" to produce air, fuel and water as it is "fundamentally impossible to create a completely closed environment in space", and that the technology to do so is "far, far behind the technology of space flight and habitation construction".[282] serkan saydam, a mining engineering professor from the university of new south wales, australia, stated that humanity currently lacks the necessary technology to establish a martian colony, and will likely lack the capacity to establish a martian city with one million people by 2050.[282] one future payload is the superbird 9 communication satellite, which was starship's first contract for externally made commercial satellites.[287] another planned payload is the starlab space station, which starship will launch in a single piece.[288] in the future, the spacecraft's crewed version could be used for space tourism for example, for the third flight of the polaris program.[289] research conducted by project lyra determined that with refueling in leo, a starship could send a spacecraft to oumuamua with a journey taking 20 years.[290] a gravity assist would be required at jupiter.[290] starbase consists of a manufacturing facility and launch site,[291] and is located at boca chica, texas. both facilities operate 24 hours a day.[22] a maximum of 450 full time employees may be onsite.[118]: 28 the site is planned to consist of two launch sites, one payload processing facility, one seven acre solar farm, and other facilities.[118]: 34 36 the company leases starbase's land for the stargate research facility, owned by the university of texas rio grande valley. it uses part of it for starship development.[292] raptor engines are tested at the rocket development facility in mcgregor, texas. the facility has two main test stands: one horizontal stand for both engine types and one vertical stand for sea level optimized rocket engines.[293] in the future, a nearby factory, which as of september 2021[update] was under construction, will make the new generation of sea level raptors while spacex's headquarters in california will continue building the raptor vacuum and test new designs.[293] at florida, a facility at cocoa purifies silica for starship heat shield tiles, producing a slurry that is then shipped to a facility at cape canaveral. in the past, workers constructed the starship mk2 prototype in competition with starbase's crews.[70] the kennedy space center, also in florida, is planned to host other starship facilities, such as a starship launch site at launch complex 39a and a production facility at roberts road. this production facility is being expanded from "hangar x", the falcon rocket boosters' storage and maintenance facility. it will include a 30,000 m2 (320,000 sq ft) building, loading dock, and a place for constructing integration tower sections.[294] adjacent to the kennedy space center will be an additional launch site at cape canaveral space launch complex 37, likely to service missions for the complex owner, the united states space force. starbase is planned to host two launch sites, named pad a and pad b.[118]: 34 a launch site at starbase has large facilities, such as a tank farm, an orbital launch mount, and an integration tower.[118] smaller facilities are present at the launch site: tanks surrounding the area containing methane, oxygen, nitrogen, helium, hydraulic fluid, etc.;[118]: 161 subcoolers near the tank farm cool propellant using liquid nitrogen; and various pipes are installed at large facilities.[56] each tank farm consists of eight tanks, enough to support one orbital launch.[56] the current launch mount on pad a has a water powered flame diverter, 20 clamps holding the booster, and a quick disconnect mount providing liquid fuel and electricity to the super heavy booster before it lifts off.[56] the integration tower or launch tower consists of steel truss sections, a lightning rod on top,[295] and a pair of mechanical arms that can lift, catch and recover the booster.[56] the decision to catch the booster with the arms was made to reduce the rocket's mass and mechanical complexity by removing the need for landing legs, as well as enabling more rapid reuse by placing the rocket directly back on the launchpad.[181]: 2 the mechanical arms are attached to a carriage and controlled by a pulley at the top of the tower.[56] the pulley is linked to a winch and spool at the base of the tower using a cable.[56] using the winch and the carriage, the mechanical arms can move vertically, with support from bearings attached at the sides of the carriage.[56] a linear hydraulic actuator moves the arms horizontally. on top of the arms are tracks, which are used to position the booster or spacecraft.[56] the tower is mounted with a quick disconnect arm extending to and contracting from the starship spacecraft; its functions are similar to the quick disconnect mount that powers the booster.[56] spacex has been constructing a starship launch pad at kennedy space center launch complex 39a (lc 39a) since 2021. the site was leased to the company in 2014 and is used to launch falcon 9 rockets.[294][296] in 2024, the federal aviation administration began the process of preparing an environmental impact statement (eis) evaluating the potential impacts of the new infrastructure and a higher launch cadence of up to 44 per year at lc 39a.[297] in june 2024, blue origin and united launch alliance (ula) provided comments as part of the eis process, both objecting to the impact that starship launch operations may have on their own activities at the site.[298] blue origin suggested several mitigations, including allowing other operators to object to a starship launch that would conflict with one of its own, limiting starship operations to particular times, or expanding the number of launchpads in the area to reduce the impact of conflicting launches.[299] ula suggested regulators prevent starship from launching in florida altogether because a fully fueled starship would require an evacuation zone so large that it would prevent other operators from using their facilities, and the noise generated by repetitive launches could be injurious to those who live or work nearby.[300][301] elon musk suggested that the two companies' comments were disingenuous and that their true motivation was to impede spacex's progress by lawfare.[298] the company has also proposed building another starship launch pad at the nearby cape canaveral space launch complex 37 (slc 37) which became vacant in 2024 after the retirement of the delta iv rocket. that year, the united states space force began the process of preparing an eis evaluating the potential impacts of new infrastructure and a launch cadence of up to 76 times per year at slc 37.[301][302][303] both eis processes must be complete before spacex will be cleared to launch starship from florida, which likely won't occur until late 2025.[298] the towers and mechanical arms at the sites should be similar to the ones at starbase, with improvements gained from the experience at boca chica.[294] in order to compete with spacex and close their technological gap with the company, the china aerospace science and tech corp and other aerospace actors in china have reportedly been working on their own equivalent of starship   the long march 9 super heavy lift rocket,[304] which is also designed to eventually be fully reusable.[305] in 2021, the china academy of launch vehicle technology (calt) showed a rendered video of a rocket noted to be "strikingly" similar to starship in appearance and function.[306] in a 2022 event organized by the international astronautical federation and the chinese society of astronautics, the calt communicated performing research on a crewed launch vehicle powered by lox methane propellant, with a second stage that was very similar to starship's.[307] spacenews noted that the chinese start up space epoch and engine maker jiuzhou yunjian were developing a smaller starship like rocket with a methane lox engine similar to raptor, stainless steel tanks, and an iterative design.[308] starship's reusability and stainless steel construction might also have inspired project jarvis, a reusable upper stage for blue origin's new glenn heavy lift launch vehicle intended to replace new glenn's expendable upper stage in the future.[309] in 2021, members of congress voiced concerns about the faa's response to spacex's launch license violations following the explosion of sn8, calling on the faa to "resist any potential undue influence on launch safety decision making".[171] in 2023, prior to starship's second test flight, spacex's vice president and ex nasa engineer bill gerstenmaier made statements at the u.s. senate on the importance of innovation in light of "strategic competition from state actors like china".[310][311][312] he said spacex was under a contract with nasa to use starship to land american astronauts on the moon before china does,[313][310] and that the starship test flights campaign was being held up by "regulatory headwinds and unnecessary bureaucracy" unrelated to public safety.[311][314] following the second integrated flight test of starship, the government accountability office (gao) made recommendations to the faa to "improve its mishap investigation process", finding that historically they have allowed the launch operator to conduct their investigation with the faa supervising.[315] several environmental groups have filed lawsuits against the faa and spacex, claiming that environmental reviews were bypassed due to musk's political and financial influence.[316]

spacex mars colonization program (colloquially also referred to as occupy mars)[1] is a planned objective of the company spacex and particularly of its founder elon musk to colonize mars. the main element of this ambition is the plan to establish a self sustained large scale settlement and colony on mars, claiming self determination under direct democracy. the main motivation behind this is the belief that the colonization of mars allows humanity to become multiplanetary and therefore secures the long term survival of the human species in case of earth being rid of human life.[2] colonization is to be achieved via the development and use of reusable and mass produced super heavy lift launch vehicles called starship. starship has been referred to as the "holy grail of rocketry" for extraplanetary colonization.[3] these plans for colonization have garnered both praise and criticism, being supported as a result of public excitement for further human involvement beyond earth and a desire to prefer human longevity, and being questioned for its existential perspective, execution, livability and legality.[3] elon musk, founder of spacex, has engaged in space advocacy relating to the colonization of mars since at least 2001 at the mars society.[4]: 30 31 as early as 2007, elon musk publicly stated a personal goal of eventually enabling human exploration and settlement of mars.[5] subsequently, spacex has stated its goal is to colonize mars to ensure the long term survival of the human species,[6] proposing since the 2000s and early 2010s different concepts for reaching mars, including space tugs. red dragon was a 2011 2017 concept mission which would have used a modified dragon 2 spacecraft as a low cost mars lander. if flown, it would have been launched on a falcon heavy, and land solely via the use of its superdraco retro propulsion thrusters,[7] as parachutes would have required significant vehicle modifications.[8] in 2011, spacex planned on proposing red dragon for the discovery mission #13, which would launch in 2022,[9][10][11] but it was not submitted. it was then proposed in 2014 as a low cost way for nasa to achieve a mars sample return by 2021. in the concept, the red dragon capsule would be equipped with the system needed to return samples gathered on mars. nasa did not fund this concept. in 2016, spacex planned on launching two red dragon vehicles[12] in 2018,[13][14] with nasa providing technical support instead of funding.[15] however, in 2017, red dragon was cancelled, in favor of the much larger starship spacecraft.[16] the company's current plan was first formally proposed at the 2016 international astronautical congress alongside a fully reusable launch vehicle, the interplanetary transport system. since then, the launch vehicle was renamed to "starship", and has been in development since. the development program reached multiple milestones in 2024 such as on its third test flight, it reached its desired trajectory for the first time and on its fourth flight test, both stages of the vehicle achieved controlled splashdown after launch for the first time. on 7 september 2024, spacex announced that it would launch the first uncrewed starship missions to mars in two years, aligning with the next earth mars transfer window. elon musk shared on the social media platform x that these missions would focus on testing the reliability of landing starships intact on mars. spacex plans to launch five uncrewed starships to mars during that transfer window.[17] if successful, the company plans to begin crewed flights to mars in about four years.[18] as early as 2007, elon musk stated a personal goal of eventually enabling human exploration and settlement of mars.[5] spacex has stated its goal is to colonize mars to ensure the long term survival of the human species by becoming multiplanetary.[6] spacex has been setting up since 2014 a facility called starbase and more recently a factory called starfactory on the previously populated and wildlife area boca chica (texas) peninsula in the rio grande delta at the gulf of mexico,[19] partly justified by spacex with its colonial perspective,[20] to launch and build an in development fully reusable super heavy lift launch vehicle with the name starship. aiming with its reusability to drastically reduce launch costs and scaled construction and swift maintenance between flights,[21]: 2 this has been the basis for spacex to advance its mars ambitions and when operational will allow it to provide the necessary transportation capabilities for its colonial goals. the reusability and its resulting reduced launch costs is expected to expand space access to more payloads and entities.[22] musk has stated that a starship orbital launch could eventually cost $2 million, starting at $10 million within 2 3 years and dropping with time.[23] starfactory is at the same time planned to produce at peak one starship per day.[24] the rocket consists of a super heavy first stage booster and a starship second stage spacecraft,[25] powered by raptor and raptor vacuum engines.[26] both stages are made from stainless steel.[27] methane was chosen for the raptor engines because it is relatively inexpensive, produces a low amount of soot as compared to other hydrocarbons,[28] and can be created on mars from carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and hydrogen via the sabatier reaction.[29] the engine family uses a new alloy for the main combustion chamber, allowing it to contain 300 bar (4,400 psi) of pressure, the highest of all current engines.[28] in the future, it may be mass produced[28] and cost about $230,000 per engine or $100 per kilonewton.[30] musk has made statements on several occasions about aspirational dates for starship's earliest possible mars landing,[31] including in 2022, that a crewed mission to mars could take place no earlier than 2029.[32] spacex's early missions to mars are to involve small fleets of starship spacecraft, funded by public private partnerships.[33] spacex has stated on several occasions aspirational plans to build a crewed base on mars for an extended surface presence, which it hopes will grow into a self sufficient colony.[34][35] before any people are transported to mars, a number of cargo missions would be undertaken first in order to transport the requisite equipment, habitats and supplies.[36] equipment that would accompany the early groups would include "machines to produce fertilizer, methane and oxygen from mars' atmospheric nitrogen and carbon dioxide and the planet's subsurface water ice" as well as construction materials to build transparent domes for crop growth.[37][38] as of september 2024, spacex plans to launch five uncrewed starships to mars during the next available earth mars transfer window in 2026.[17] musk plans for the first crewed mars missions to have approximately 12 people, with goals to "build out and troubleshoot the propellant plant and mars base alpha power system" and establish a "rudimentary base." the company plans to process resources on mars into fuel for return journeys,[39] and use similar technologies on earth to create carbon neutral propellant.[40] the company hopes that once infrastructure is established on mars and launch cost is reduced, populating can begin. after the first few windows of crewed mars landings, musk has suggested that the number of people who are sent to mars could be ramped up rapidly. a successful colonization, meaning an established human presence on mars growing over many decades, would ultimately involve many more economic actors than spacex.[43][44][45] for reference, musk's timeline for the colonization of mars involves a crewed mission as early as 2029 and the development of a self sustaining colony by 2050.[46] musk has stated in 2024 that in situ resource utilization will be critical for establishing a self sustaining colony, and that spacex plans to begin its efforts in advancing that field in "seven to nine years".[47] current theories for in situ resource utilization involve harvesting co2 from the atmosphere and splitting into its raw components. this will involve using the o2 as well as ch4 for fuel production, and specifically the o2 in addition to nitrogen (the second most common gas in the martian atmosphere) for breathing air within habitats.[48] the program aims to send a million people to mars, using a thousand starships sent during a mars launch window, which occurs approximately every 26 months.[49] proposed journeys would require 80 to 150 days of transit time,[45] averaging approximately 115 days (for the nine synodic periods occurring between 2024 and 2041).[50] mars colonization has gained increased interest, both supportive and critical, since the technical achievements of spacex's and elon musk's rise of popularity in the 2010s, and more so into the 2020s. some experts, like robert zubrin, support the concept due to the prevalence of water ice in the form of permafrost and glaciers on mars, as well as other resources like carbon dioxide and nitrogen.[51] according to zubrin, starship's planned lower launch cost could make space research profitable, allowing major advancements in medicine, computers, material science,[4]: 47, 48 making mining profitable as well and space based economy and colonization practical.[4]: 25, 26 others like saul zimet have expressed strong support for the concept, suggesting the possibility that the technological advancements that could be developed on mars will come to benefit the whole of earth.[52] spacex's plan and colonization of mars in general, has been criticized ethically and technically. it has been argued that settling mars may divert attention from solving problems on earth that may also become problems on mars,[53] with the reasoning that plans about mars are always about the plans we have for earth.[54] jeff bezos, founder of blue origin, spacex's would be competitor in commercial spaceflight, has rejected mars colonization as a mere "plan b", suggesting instead to preserve earth through space development and moving all heavy industrial activity to space.[55] spacex's perspective has also been criticised as perpetuating the idea of colonialism.[56][1] zahaan barhmal of the guardian writes that the impact of human settlement on mars, with regards to planetary protection, has not been comprehensively answered.[53] it has been argued that there are physical and social consequences that need to be addressed with regards to long term survival on the surface of mars.[54] former u.s. president barack obama has characterized mars as more inhospitable than earth would be "even after a nuclear war",[57] with others pointing out that earth and underground shelters on earth could still provide better conditions and protection for more people from apocalyptic scenarios.[53] mars colonization has been called a 'dangerous delusion' by lord martin rees, a british cosmologist/astrophysicist and the astronomer royal of the united kingdom.[58] musk has stated that staying on mars is a life threatening endeavor that needs to be glorious to be worth it.[1] exploration of mars has also been argued[who?] to be better left to the already successful robotic missions, with crewed missions simply being too expensive, dangerous and boring.[53] regarding the execution of spacex's mars program, the plans have been criticized as far fetched because of uncertainties in its financing[6] and because it primarily addresses transportation to mars and not the steps that follow. as of july 2019, spacex had not publicly detailed plans for the spacecraft's life support systems, radiation protection, and in situ resource utilization, which are essential for space colonization.[59] george dvorsky writing for gizmodo characterized musk's timeline for martian colonization as "stupendously unreasonable" and "pure delusion".[60] spacex intends to base the colony governing laws on self determination,[61] and direct democracy (instead of representative democracy).[62] some of this has been introduced through the terms and services agreement for individual users of spacex's starlink platform, stating the following: "the parties recognize mars as a free planet and that no earth based government has authority or sovereignty over martian activities".[63] in contrast to such claims, international space law, proclaiming space being "province of all mankind", holds that mars is not free to be claimed, its legal status sharing some elements of the legal status of international waters.[64] furthermore, the realization of direct democracy by technocratic colonizers[62] and the legal accommodation of a diverse population is thought to be challenging.[65] it has been pointed out that, coincidentally, rocket engineer wernher von braun envisioned colonies on mars led by a publicly elected leader titled the "elon" in his book, project mars: a technical tale. [66]

jared isaacman, founder and ceo of shift4 who commanded the inspiration4 mission, announced today the polaris program, a first of its kind effort to rapidly advance human spaceflight capabilities, while continuing to raise funds and awareness for important causes here on earth. the program will consist of up to three human spaceflight missions that will demonstrate new technologies, conduct extensive research, and ultimately culminate in the first flight of spacex’s starship with humans on board. the first mission, polaris dawn, is targeted to launch no earlier than the fourth quarter of 2022 from historic launch complex 39a at nasa’s kennedy space center in florida. this dragon mission will take advantage of falcon 9 and dragon’s maximum performance, flying higher than any dragon mission to date and endeavoring to reach the highest earth orbit ever flown. dragon and the polaris dawn crew will spend up to five days in orbit, during which the crew will attempt the first ever commercial spacewalk, conduct scientific research designed to advance both human health on earth and our understanding of human health during future long duration spaceflights, and be the first crew to test starlink laser based communications in space, providing valuable data for future space communications systems necessary for missions to the moon, mars, and beyond. the polaris dawn mission has many first time objectives, so the polaris program chose a crew of experts who know each other well and have a foundation of trust they can build upon as they undergo the challenges of this mission. in addition to isaacman, the crew includes scott “kidd” poteet, a veteran member of jared’s team, and two spacex employees, sarah gillis and anna menon. on thursday, february 10 from starbase in texas, spacex chief engineer elon musk provided an update on the development of starship, a fully reusable transportation system capable of carrying passengers and cargo to earth orbit, the moon, mars, and beyond. on thursday, february 3 at 1:13 p.m. est, falcon 9 launched 49 starlink satellites to low earth orbit from launch complex 39a (lc 39a) at kennedy space center in florida. falcon 9’s second stage deployed the satellites into their intended orbit, with a perigee of approximately 210 kilometers above earth, and each satellite achieved controlled flight. spacex deploys its satellites into these lower orbits so that in the very rare case any satellite does not pass initial system checkouts it will quickly be deorbited by atmospheric drag. while the low deployment altitude requires more capable satellites at a considerable cost to us, it’s the right thing to do to maintain a sustainable space environment. unfortunately, the satellites deployed on thursday were significantly impacted by a geomagnetic storm on friday. these storms cause the atmosphere to warm and atmospheric density at our low deployment altitudes to increase. in fact, onboard gps suggests the escalation speed and severity of the storm caused atmospheric drag to increase up to 50 percent higher than during previous launches. the starlink team commanded the satellites into a safe mode where they would fly edge on (like a sheet of paper) to minimize drag to effectively “take cover from the storm” and continued to work closely with the space force’s 18th space control squadron and leolabs to provide updates on the satellites based on ground radars. preliminary analysis show the increased drag at the low altitudes prevented the satellites from leaving safe mode to begin orbit raising maneuvers, and up to 40 of the satellites will reenter or already have reentered the earth’s atmosphere. the deorbiting satellites pose zero collision risk with other satellites and by design demise upon atmospheric reentry meaning no orbital debris is created and no satellite parts hit the ground. this unique situation demonstrates the great lengths the starlink team has gone to ensure the system is on the leading edge of on orbit debris mitigation. on tuesday, november 23 at 10:21 p.m. pst, falcon 9 launched nasa’s double asteroid redirection test (dart) mission to an interplanetary transfer orbit from space launch complex 4 east (slc 4e) at vandenberg space force base in california. dart is humanity’s first planetary defense test mission to see if intentionally crashing a spacecraft into an asteroid is an effective way to change its course, should an earth threatening asteroid be discovered in the future. this was spacex’s first inter planetary mission. this was the third flight for this falcon 9’s first stage booster, which previously supported launch of sentinel 6 michael freilich and a starlink mission. on thursday, november 11 at 6:32 p.m. est, 23:32 utc, spacex’s dragon autonomously docked with the international space station. falcon 9 launched the spacecraft to orbit from histsoric launch complex 39a (lc 39a) at nasa’s kennedy space center in florida on wednesday, november 10 at 9:03 p.m. est. on thursday, november 11 at 6:32 p.m. est, 23:32 utc, spacex’s dragon autonomously docked with the international space station. falcon 9 launched the spacecraft to orbit from histsoric launch complex 39a (lc 39a) at nasa’s kennedy space center in florida on wednesday, november 10 at 9:03 p.m. est. after 199 days in space, the longest duration mission for a u.s. spacecraft, dragon and the crew 2 astronauts, shane kimbrough , megan mcarthur , akihiko hoshide , and thomas pesquet , returned to earth, splashing down off the coast of pensacola, florida at 10:33 p.m. est on november 8. dragon and the crew 2 astronauts were quickly recovered by the spacex recovery team. spacex will transport dragon back to cape canaveral, florida for inspections and refurbishment ahead of future human spaceflight missions. this mission marked multiple firsts for spacex and nasa’s commercial crew program, including being the first to fly two international partners, the first crew mission to use a flight proven dragon and falcon 9, and the first u.s. spacecraft to spend 199 consecutive days in orbit. after three days orbiting earth, dragon and the inspiration4 crew   the world’s first civilian mission to orbit   safely splashed down off the coast of florida at 7:06 p.m. edt on saturday, september 18, 2021, completing their first multi day low earth orbit mission. dragon performed a series of departure phasing burns to leave the circular orbit of 575 kilometers and then jettisoned its trunk ahead of its deorbit burn. after re entering the earth’s atmosphere, the spacecraft deployed its two drogue and four main parachutes in preparation for the soft water landing. inspiration4 is commanded by jared isaacman, founder and ceo of shift4 payments and an accomplished pilot and adventurer. joining him are medical officer hayley arceneaux, a physician assistant at st. jude children’s research hospital® and pediatric cancer survivor; mission specialist chris sembroski, an air force veteran and aerospace data engineer; and mission pilot dr. sian proctor, a geoscientist, entrepreneur, and trained pilot. developed by spacex to support nasa’s commercial crew program, dragon helped return human spaceflight capabilities in 2020 and has successfully flown three human spaceflight missions to the international space station (iss) to date. in addition to flying astronauts to space for nasa, dragon can also carry commercial astronauts to earth orbit, the iss or beyond. today, axiom space announced spacex will fly three additional private crew missions aboard dragon to and from the station through 2023. axiom previously announced their first mission to the international space station flying aboard dragon, currently targeted to liftoff no earlier than january 2022. in may 2021, axiom announced that astronaut peggy whitson and champion gt racer john shoffner will serve as commander and pilot on the ax 2 mission . all four crews will receive combined commercial astronaut training from nasa and spacex, with spacex providing training on the falcon 9 launch vehicle and dragon spacecraft, emergency preparedness training, spacesuit and spacecraft ingress and egress exercises, as well as partial and full simulations. the growing partnership between axiom and spacex will enable more opportunities for more humans in space on the road to making humanity multiplanetary. on wednesday, may 5, starship serial number 15 (sn15) successfully completed spacex’s fifth high altitude flight test of a starship prototype from starbase in texas. similar to previous high altitude flight tests of starship , sn15 was powered through ascent by three raptor engines, each shutting down in sequence prior to the vehicle reaching apogee   approximately 10 km in altitude. sn15 performed a propellant transition to the internal header tanks, which hold landing propellant, before reorienting itself for reentry and a controlled aerodynamic descent. the starship prototype descended under active aerodynamic control, accomplished by independent movement of two forward and two aft flaps on the vehicle. all four flaps were actuated by an onboard flight computer to control starship’s attitude during flight and enabled precise landing at the intended location. sn15’s raptor engines reignited as the vehicle performed the landing flip maneuver immediately before touching down for a nominal landing on the pad. these test flights of starship are all about improving our understanding and development of a fully reusable transportation system designed to carry both crew and cargo on long duration interplanetary flights, and help humanity return to the moon, and travel to mars and beyond. congratulations to the entire spacex team on sn15’s successful flight and landing! after 167 days in space, the longest duration mission for a u.s. spacecraft since the final skylab mission in 1974, dragon and the crew 1 astronauts, mike hopkins , victor glover , shannon walker , and soichi noguchi , returned to earth on sunday, may 2, 2021. dragon autonomously undocked from the international space station at 8:35 p.m. edt on saturday, may 1. the spacecraft performed a series of departure burns to move away from the orbiting laboratory. before reentry, dragon jettisoned its trunk to reduce weight and mass to help save propellant for the deorbit burn. the spacecraft then re entered the earth’s atmosphere and deployed its two drogue and four main parachutes in preparation for the soft water landing. approximately 6.5 hours after undocking, dragon splashed down off the coast of florida at 2:56 a.m. edt on sunday, may 2, completing the spacecraft’s first long duration operational mission. this was also the first nighttime splashdown of a u.s. spacecraft with crew on board since apollo 8’s return in 1968. upon splashdown, dragon and the crew 1 astronauts were quickly recovered by the spacex recovery team. spacex will transport dragon back to cape canaveral for inspections and refurbishment ahead of future human spaceflight missions. on saturday, april 24 at 5:08 a.m. edt, 9:08 utc, spacex’s dragon autonomously docked with the international space station (iss) after falcon 9 launched the spacecraft to orbit from historic launch complex 39a (lc 39a) at nasa’s kennedy space center in florida on friday, april 23 at 5:49 a.m. edt, 9:49 utc. this is the first human spaceflight mission to fly astronauts on a flight proven falcon 9 and dragon. the falcon 9 first stage supporting this mission previously launched the crew 1 mission in november 2020, and the dragon spacecraft previously flew robert behnken and douglas hurley to and from the international space station during spacex’s demo 2 mission in 2020. as part of the commercial crew program, nasa astronauts shane kimbrough and megan mcarthur , japanese aerospace exploration agency (jaxa) astronaut akihiko hoshide , and european space agency (esa) astronaut thomas pesquet flew aboard the dragon spacecraft on its second operational mission to the space station. this was the first time dragon flew two international partners and also the first time two crew dragons are attached simultaneously to the orbiting laboratory. after an approximate six month stay, dragon and the crew 2 astronauts will depart from the space station no earlier than october 31 for return to earth and splashdown in the atlantic ocean off the coast of florida. only 24 humans have been to the moon, and no one has been back since 1972. today, nasa announced they have selected starship to land the first astronauts on the lunar surface since the apollo program. we are humbled to help nasa usher in a new era of human space exploration. together, nasa and spacex have successfully executed similarly bold and innovative partnerships, including restoring america’s ability to launch astronauts to orbit and return them safely home. we will build upon our shared accomplishments, and leverage years of close technical collaboration to return to the moon. in doing so, we will lay the groundwork for human exploration to mars and beyond. sustaining a human presence on the moon will require the safe and affordable transportation of crew and significant amounts of cargo. spacex’s starship spacecraft and super heavy rocket represent an integrated and fully reusable launch, propellant delivery, rendezvous, and planetary lander system with robust capabilities and safety features uniquely designed to deliver these essential building blocks. flying between lunar orbit and the surface of the moon, starship will carry crew and all of the supplies, equipment, and science payloads needed for extensive surface exploration. building off the safety and reliability of dragon and falcon, starship will feature proven avionics, guidance and navigation systems, autonomous rendezvous, docking and precision landing capabilities, as well as thermal protection, and a spacious cabin with familiar displays and interfaces utilized on dragon . spacex is rapidly advancing starship development, drawing on an extensive history of launch vehicle and engine development programs. since january 2020, spacex has built 10 starship prototypes, with production and fidelity accelerating on each build. spacex has manufactured and tested more than 60 of starship’s raptor engines, accumulating nearly 30,000 seconds of total test time over 567 engine starts, including on multiple starship static fires and flight tests. we have conducted six suborbital flight tests, including two 150 m hops and four high altitude flights. spacex has also built a full size super heavy booster as part of a pathfinder effort, and currently has five vehicles in production. we are honored to be a part of nasa’s artemis program to safely land the first woman and next man on the surface of the moon, as the first of many, many more people to follow. on tuesday, march 30, spacex launched its fourth high altitude flight test of starship from starbase in texas. similar to previous high altitude flight tests, starship serial number 11 (sn11) was powered through ascent by three raptor engines, each shutting down in sequence prior to the vehicle reaching apogee   approximately 10 km in altitude. sn11 performed a propellant transition to the internal header tanks, which hold landing propellant, before reorienting itself for reentry and a controlled aerodynamic descent. shortly after the landing burn started, sn11 experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly. teams will continue to review data and work toward our next flight test. test flights are all about improving our understanding and development of a fully reusable transportation system designed to carry both crew and cargo on long duration interplanetary flights, and help humanity return to the moon, and travel to mars and beyond. on wednesday, march 3, starship serial number (sn10) successfully completed spacex’s third high altitude flight test of a starship prototype from our site in cameron county, texas. similar to the high altitude flight tests of starship sn8 and sn9 , sn10 was powered through ascent by three raptor engines, each shutting down in sequence prior to the vehicle reaching apogee   approximately 10 km in altitude. sn10 performed a propellant transition to the internal header tanks, which hold landing propellant, before reorienting itself for reentry and a controlled aerodynamic descent. the starship prototype descended under active aerodynamic control, accomplished by independent movement of two forward and two aft flaps on the vehicle. all four flaps were actuated by an onboard flight computer to control starship’s attitude during flight and enabled a precise landing at the intended location. sn10’s raptor engines reignited as the vehicle performed the landing flip maneuver immediately before successfully touching down on the landing pad! as if the flight test was not exciting enough, sn10 experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly shortly after landing. all in all a great day for the starship teams   these test flights are all about improving our understanding and development of a fully reusable transportation system designed to carry both crew and cargo on long duration interplanetary flights, and help humanity return to the moon, and travel to mars and beyond. congratulations to the entire starship and spacex teams on the flight test! in 2018, japanese entrepreneur, yusaku maezawa, announced the world’s first private passenger mission to fly by the moon aboard starship . known as dearmoon, this mission is an important step toward enabling access for people who dream of traveling to space. today, the dearmoon project opened the application process for eight civilians to join yusaku maezawa on the week long starship mission around the moon in 2023. visit the dearmoon website or watch the video above to learn more on how to apply and potentially become a dearmoon crew member! on tuesday, february 2, starship serial number 9 (sn9) completed spacex’s second high altitude flight test of a starship prototype from our site in cameron county, texas. similar to the high altitude flight test of starship serial number 8 (sn8) , sn9 was powered through ascent by three raptor engines, each shutting down in sequence prior to the vehicle reaching apogee   approximately 10 kilometers in altitude. sn9 successfully performed a propellant transition to the internal header tanks, which hold landing propellant, before reorienting itself for reentry and a controlled aerodynamic descent. the starship prototype descended under active aerodynamic control, accomplished by independent movement of two forward and two aft flaps on the vehicle. all four flaps are actuated by an onboard flight computer to control starship’s attitude during flight and enable precise landing at the intended location. during the landing flip maneuver, one of the raptor engines did not relight and caused sn9 to land at high speed and experience a rud. these test flights are all about improving our understanding and development of a fully reusable transportation system designed to carry both crew and cargo on long duration, interplanetary flights and help humanity return to the moon, and travel to mars and beyond. in 2020, spacex returned america’s ability to fly nasa astronauts to and from the international space station for the first time since the space shuttle’s last flight in 2011. in addition to flying astronauts for nasa, dragon was also designed to carry commercial astronauts to earth orbit, the space station, or beyond. today, it was announced spacex is targeting no earlier than the fourth quarter of this year for falcon 9’s launch of inspiration4   the world’s first all commercial astronaut mission to orbit   from historic launch complex 39a at nasa’s kennedy space center in florida. jared isaacman, founder and ceo of shift4 payments, is donating the three seats alongside him aboard dragon to individuals from the general public who will be announced in the weeks ahead. learn more on how to potentially join this historic journey to space by visiting inspiration4.com . the inspiration4 crew will receive commercial astronaut training by spacex on the falcon 9 launch vehicle and dragon spacecraft, orbital mechanics, operating in microgravity, zero gravity, and other forms of stress testing. they will go through emergency preparedness training, spacesuit and spacecraft ingress and egress exercises, as well as partial and full mission simulations. this multi day journey, orbiting earth every 90 minutes along a customized flight path, will be carefully monitored at every step by spacex mission control. upon conclusion of the mission, dragon will reenter earth’s atmosphere for a soft water landing off the coast of florida. on wednesday, december 9, starship serial number 8 (sn8) lifted off from our cameron county launch pad and successfully ascended, transitioned propellant, and performed its landing flip maneuver with precise flap control to reach its landing point. low pressure in the fuel header tank during the landing burn led to high touchdown velocity resulting in a hard (and exciting!) landing. re watch sn8's flight here. thank you to all the locals supporting our efforts in cameron county and beyond. congratulations to the entire starship and spacex teams on today’s test! serial number 9 (sn9) is up next   mars, here we come! on monday, november 16 at 11:01 p.m. est, 04:01 utc on november 17, spacex’s dragon autonomously docked with the international space station (iss) after falcon 9 launched the spacecraft to orbit from historic launch complex 39a (lc 39a) at nasa’s kennedy space center in florida on sunday, november 15, 2020. as part of the commercial crew program, nasa astronauts mike hopkins , victor glover , shannon walker , and jaxa astronaut soichi noguchi flew aboard dragon on its first six month operational mission to the space station. after its approximately six month stay at the orbiting laboratory, dragon and the astronauts will return to earth and splashdown in the atlantic ocean off the coast of florida. following dragon’s second demonstration mission (demo 2), nasa certified spacex for operational crew missions to and from the space station. crew 1 is the first of three scheduled dragon human spaceflights over the course of 2020 and 2021. the return of human spaceflight to the united states with one of the safest, most advanced systems ever built is a turning point for america’s future space exploration, and it lays the groundwork for missions to the moon, mars, and beyond. today, nasa announced it has certified spacex’s falcon 9 and crew dragon human spaceflight system for crew missions to and from the international space station   the first commercial system in history to achieve such designation. not since the certification of the space shuttle nearly 40 years ago has nasa certified a spacecraft, rocket, and ground support systems for regular flights with astronauts. launched atop falcon 9 on may 30, 2020, dragon 's second demonstration flight test to and from the space station restored human spaceflight to the united states for the first time in almost a decade. that flight was the culmination of years of development, testing, and training all throughout safety remained spacex’s top priority. spacex put every component of every system through its paces, including two flight tests to and from the international space station, demonstrations of dragon’s escape system both on the launch pad and in flight, over 700 tests of the spacecraft's superdraco engines, more than 500 joint soft capture docking tests to validate the performance of dragon’s docking system design, about 8,000,000 hours of hardware in the loop software testing, and nearly 100 tests and flights of dragon’s parachutes to ensure a safe landing back on earth in addition to all of the knowledge gained from twenty previous successful cargo resupply missions to the space station and over forty falcon 9 block 5 launches. spacex and nasa are targeting saturday, november 14 at 7:49 p.m. est for the launch of the first crew rotation mission (crew 1) to the international space station as part of the agency’s commercial crew program. the crew 1 mission will launch nasa astronauts michael hopkins , victor glover , and shannon walker , along with japan aerospace exploration agency (jaxa) mission specialist soichi noguchi , from historic launch complex 39a at kennedy space center in florida. human spaceflight is spacex’s core mission, and we take seriously the responsibility that nasa has entrusted in us to safely carry astronauts to and from the international space station. we are humbled to help nasa usher in a new era of space exploration. on saturday, october 24 at 11:31 a.m. edt, 11:31 utc, spacex’s falcon 9 rocket launched 60 starlink satellites to orbit from space launch complex 40 (slc 40) at cape canaveral air force station in florida. falcon 9’s first stage previously supported the gps iii space vehicle 03 mission in june 2020 and a starlink mission in september 2020. following stage separation, spacex landed falcon 9’s first stage on the “just read the instructions” droneship, which was stationed in the atlantic ocean. the starlink satellites deployed approximately 1 hour and 3 minutes after liftoff. if you would like to receive updates on starlink news and service availability in your area, please visit starlink.com . this mission also marked the 100th successful flight of a falcon rocket since falcon 1 first flew to orbit in 2008. spacex believes that fully and rapidly reusable rockets are the pivotal breakthrough needed to dramatically reduce the cost of access to space to enable people to travel to and live on other planets. while most rockets are expendable after launch   akin to throwing away an airplane after a one way trip from los angeles to new york   spacex is working toward a future in which reusable rockets are the norm. of its now 100 successful flights of falcon rockets, spacex has landed a falcon first stage rocket booster 63 times and re flown boosters 45 times. this year, spacex twice accomplished the sixth flight of an orbital rocket booster. and, in the ten years since its demonstration mission, falcon 9 has become the most flown operational rocket in the united states, overtaking expendable rockets that have been launching for decades. the difficulty of precision landing an orbital rocket after it reenters earth’s atmosphere at hypersonic velocity is not to be overlooked   spacex remains the only launch provider in the world capable of accomplishing this task. at 14 stories tall and traveling upwards of 1300 m/s (nearly 1 mi/s), stabilizing falcon 9’s first stage booster for landing is like trying to balance a rubber broomstick on your hand in the middle of a hurricane. while recovery and re flight of an orbital rocket booster may now seem routine, developing falcon such that it would withstand reentry and return for landing was generally accepted as impossible   and spacex learned many lessons on the road to reusability . spacex’s accomplishments with flight proven rockets and spacecraft have allowed us to further advance the fleet’s reliability and reusability, as well as inform the development of starship   spacex’s next generation fully and rapidly reusable super heavy lift transportation system. starship’s capability of full and rapid reuse will lower the cost of spaceflight to help humanity return to the moon, travel to mars, and ultimately become multi planetary. ahead of falcon 9’s upcoming launch of gps iii 4, the united states space force’s space and missile systems center (smc) announced today an agreement with spacex to recover the first stage booster and, for the first time on a national security space launch (nssl) mission, launch previously flown boosters on future gps missions. spacex is proud to leverage its flight proven capabilities toward national security space launch missions. spacex was also recently selected by the space force to carry out critical national security space launch (nssl) missions ordered over the next five years. spacex will build upon our years long collaboration with the united states air force and the national reconnaissance office to utilize the operationally mature falcon fleet, which has achieved nssl certification and completed a combined 95 orbital missions to date for a variety of customers. with falcon 9 and falcon heavy , spacex is capable of performing every type of national security space mission, to every required reference orbit, with significant performance and schedule margin. to meet or exceed the demanding and unique requirements of the nssl program, spacex invested over a billion dollars of its own money into the falcon fleet and the associated ground infrastructure, manufacturing processes, payload integration procedures, and mission assurance processes. this private investment over multiple years reflects spacex’s deep commitment to reliably launching our customers' payloads to orbit. and, as spacex brought competition back to national security space launch, the united states air force saved billions in critical taxpayer funds. spacex is honored to support the united states space force with a solution given the highest possible rating for system capability, schedule readiness, and system risk, using a mix of new and flight proven launch vehicles. we look forward to leveraging this extensive capability to continue delivering the country’s most reliable and affordable launch services for years to come. on tuesday, august 4 at 4:56 p.m. cdt in boca chica, texas, starship serial number 5 (sn5) lifted off from its launch mount and flew to a height of 150 meters before successfully touching down on a near by landing pad. on this flight test, sn5 was powered by a single raptor engine   a reusable methalox full flow staged combustion rocket engine. this test flight was an important step in development of spacex’s fully reusable transportation system designed to carry both crew and cargo to earth orbit, the moon, mars and beyond. on saturday, may 30, spacex’s falcon 9 launched crew dragon’s second demonstration (demo 2) mission from launch complex 39a (lc 39a) at nasa’s kennedy space center in florida with nasa astronauts bob behnken and doug hurley aboard the spacecraft. dragon autonomously docked to the international space station on sunday, may 31, 2020. sixty three days later, crew dragon undocked and departed from the orbiting laboratory, before successfully splashing down in the gulf of mexico off the coast of pensacola, florida on sunday, august 2 at 2:48 p.m. edt. this test flight marked the return of human spaceflight to the united states and the first time in history a commercial company successfully took astronauts to orbit and back. the demo 2 mission was also the final major test milestone for spacex’s human spaceflight system to be certified by nasa for operational crew missions to and from the international space station. with the demo 2 mission now complete, spacex and nasa teams are reviewing all the data for certification before nasa astronauts victor glover, mike hopkins, shannon walker, and jaxa astronaut soichi noguchi fly on dragon’s first six month operational mission (crew 1), targeted for late september. on saturday, may 30 at 3:22 p.m. edt, spacex’s falcon 9 launched crew dragon’s second demonstration (demo 2) mission from launch complex 39a (lc 39a) at nasa’s kennedy space center in florida, and the next day crew dragon autonomously docked to the international space station. this test flight with nasa astronauts bob behnken and doug hurley on board the dragon spacecraft returned human spaceflight to the united states. demo 2 is the final major test for spacex’s human spaceflight system to be certified by nasa for operational crew missions to and from the international space station. spacex is returning human spaceflight to the united states with one of the safest, most advanced systems ever built, and nasa’s commercial crew program is a turning point for america’s future in space exploration that lays the groundwork for future missions to the moon, mars, and beyond. spacex is launching starlink to provide high speed, low latency broadband connectivity across the globe, including to locations where internet has traditionally been too expensive, unreliable, or entirely unavailable. we also firmly believe in the importance of a natural night sky for all of us to enjoy, which is why we have been working with leading astronomers around the world to better understand the specifics of their observations and engineering changes we can make to reduce satellite brightness. our goals include: making the satellites generally invisible to the naked eye within a week of launch. we're doing this by changing the way the satellites fly to their operational altitude, so that they fly with the satellite knife edge to the sun. we are working on implementing this as soon as possible for all satellites since it is a software change. minimizing starlink's impact on astronomy by darkening satellites so they do not saturate observatory detectors. we're accomplishing this by adding a deployable visor to the satellite to block sunlight from hitting the brightest parts of the spacecraft. the first unit is flying on the next launch, and by flight 9 in june all future starlink satellites will have sun visors. additionally, information about our satellites' orbits are located on space track.org to facilitate observation scheduling for astronomers. we are interested in feedback on ways to improve the utility and timeliness of this information. to better explain the details of brightness mitigation efforts, we need to explain more about how the starlink satellites work. starlink orbits starlink has three phases of flight: (1) orbit raise, (2) parking orbit (380 km above earth), and (3) on station (550 km above earth). during orbit raise the satellites use their thrusters to raise altitude over the course of a few weeks. some of the satellites go directly to station while others pause in the parking orbit to allow the satellites to precess to a different orbital plane. once satellites are on station they reconfigure so the antennas face earth and the solar array goes vertical so that it can track the sun to maximize power generation. as a result of this maneuver, the satellites become much darker because the solar array visibility from the ground is greatly reduced. currently, about half of the over 400 satellites are on station and the other half are orbit raising or in the parking orbit. satellites spend a small fraction of their lives orbit raising or parking and spend the vast majority of their lives on station. it's important to note that at any given time, only about several hundred satellites will be orbit raising or parking. the rest of the satellites will be in the operational orbit on station. starlink satellite the starlink satellite design was driven by the fact that they fly at a very low altitude compared to other communications satellites. we do this to prioritize space traffic safety and to minimize the latency of the signal between the satellite and the users who are getting internet service from it. because of the low altitude, drag is a major factor in the design. during orbit raise, the satellites must minimize their cross sectional area relative to the 'wind,' otherwise drag will cause them to fall out of orbit. high drag is a double edged sword it means that flying the satellites is tricky, but it also means that any satellites that are experiencing problems will de orbit quickly and safely burn up in the atmosphere. this reduces the amount of orbital debris or 'space junk' in orbit. this low drag and thrusting flight configuration resembles an open book, where the solar array is laid out flat in front of the vehicle. when starlink satellites are orbit raising, they roll to a limited extent about the velocity vector for power generation, always keeping the cross sectional area minimized while keeping the antennas facing earth enough to stay in contact with the ground stations. when the satellites reach their operational orbit of 550 km, drag is still a factor so any inoperable satellite will quickly decay but the attitude control system is able to overcome this drag with the solar array raised above the satellite in a vertical orientation that we call 'shark fin.' this is the orientation in which the satellite spends the majority of its operational life. satellite visibility satellites are visible from the ground at sunrise or sunset. this happens because the satellites are illuminated by the sun but people or telescopes on the ground are in the dark. these conditions only happen for a fraction of starlink's 90 minute orbit. this simple diagram highlights why satellites in orbit raise are so much brighter than the satellites that are on station. during orbit raise, when the solar array is in open book, sunlight can reflect off of both the solar array and the body of the satellite and hit the ground. once on station, only certain parts of the chassis can reflect light to the ground. physics of satellite brightness the apparent magnitude of an object is a measure of the brightness of a star or object observed from earth. it is a reverse logarithmic scale, so higher numbers correspond to dimmer objects. a star of magnitude 3 is approximately 2.5 times brighter than a star of magnitude 4. based on observations that have been taken by us and by members of the astronomical community, current starlink satellites have an average apparent magnitude of 5.5 when on station and brighter during orbit raise. objects up to about magnitude 6.5 7 are visible to the naked eye (naked eye visibility is closer to 4 in most suburbs), and our goal is for starlink satellites to be magnitude 7 or better for almost all phases of their mission. there are two types of reflections off of starlink satellites: diffuse and specular. diffuse reflections occur when light is scattered in many different directions. imagine shining a flashlight at a white wall. specular reflections happen when light is reflected in a particular direction. for example, the glint of sunlight off of a mirror. diffuse reflections are the biggest contributor to observed brightness on the ground, because diffuse reflections go in all directions. you can see diffuse reflections as long as the satellite is visible. this is why starlink satellites can create the 'string of pearls' effect in the night sky. it's a little counter intuitive, but the shiny components of the starlink satellites are a much smaller problem. whether diffuse or specular, having a high reflectance helps the satellites stay cool in space. when sunlight hits a specular surface of the spacecraft and reflects, the vast majority of light reflects in the specular (mirror reflection) direction, which is generally out toward space (not toward earth). occasionally when it does, the glint only lasts for a second or less. in fact, specular surfaces tend to be the dimmest part of the satellite unless you are at just the right geometry. the biggest contributors to starlink being bright are the white diffuse phased array antennas on the bottom of the satellite, the white diffuse parabolic antennas on the sides (not shown below), and the white diffuse back side of the solar array. these surfaces are all white to keep temperatures down so components do not overheat. the key to making starlink darker is to prevent sunlight from illuminating these white surfaces and scattering via reflection toward observers on the ground. while in orbit raise and the parking orbit the solar array dominates due to the much larger surface area. however, once the satellites are at their operational altitude, the antennas dominate because the bright backside of the solar array is shadowed. solutions in work we've taken an experimental and iterative approach to reducing the brightness of the starlink satellites. orbital brightness is an extremely difficult problem to tackle analytically, so we've been hard at work on both ground and on orbit testing. for example, earlier this year we launched darksat, which is an experimental satellite where we darkened the phased array and parabolic antennas designed to tackle on station brightness. this reduced the brightness of the satellite by about 55%, as was verified by differential optical measurements comparing darksat to other nearby starlink satellites. this is nearly enough of a brightness reduction to make the satellite invisible to the naked eye while on station. however, black surfaces in space get hot and reflect some light (including in the ir spectrum), so we are moving forward with a sun visor solution instead. this avoids thermal issues due to black paint, and is expected to be darker than darksat since it will block all light from reaching the white diffuse antennas. early mission (orbit raise and parking orbit) roll maneuver since the visor is intended to help with brightness while on station, it does not shade the back of the solar array, which means that it will not prevent orbit raise and parking orbit brightness. for this, we are working on changing the way the satellite flies up from insertion to parking orbit and to station. we're currently testing rolling the satellite so the vector of the sun is in plane with the satellite body, i.e. so the satellite is knife edge to the sun. this would reduce the light reflected onto earth by reducing the surface area that receives light. this is possible when orbit raising and parking in the precession orbit because we don't have to constrain the antennas to be nadir facing to provide coverage to internet users. however, there are a couple of nuanced reasons why this is tricky to implement. first, rolling the solar array away from the sun reduces the amount of power available to the satellite. second, because the antennas will sometimes be rolled away from the ground, contact time with the satellites will be reduced. third, the star tracker cameras are located on the sides of the chassis (the only place they can go and have adequate field of view). rolling knife edge to the sun can point one star tracker directly at the earth and the other one directly at the sun, which would cause the satellite to have degraded attitude knowledge. there will be a small percentage of instances when the satellites cannot roll all the way to true knife edge to the sun due to one of the aforementioned constraints. this could result in the occasional set of starlink satellites in the orbit raise of flight that are temporarily visible for one part of an orbit. on station brightness satellites spend most of their lives on station, where they will always be in the shark fin configuration during visible passes. we can adjust the solar array positioning in this configuration to reflect light from its largely specular solar cells away from earth and to partially hide it behind the chassis. the main remaining goal is to block the phased arrays and antennae from direct view of the sun. the goal is to cover the white phased array antennas and the parabolic antennas on the sides of the satellite. using our low orbital altitude and flat satellite geometry to our advantage, we designed an rf transparent deployable visor for the satellite that blocks the light from reaching most of the satellite body and all of the diffuse parts of the main body. this visor lays flat on the chassis during launch and deploys during satellite separation from falcon 9. the visor prevents light from reflecting off of the diffuse antennas by blocking the light from reaching the antennas altogether. not only does this approach avoid the thermal impacts from surface darkening the antennas, but it should also have a larger impact on brightness reduction. as previously noted, the first visorsat prototype will launch in may and we will have these black, specular visors on all satellites by june. the parabolic antennas on the sides of the starlink satellite also have visor like coverings that darken them. we have been working with leading astronomical groups in this effort in particular the american astronomical society and the vera c. rubin observatory to better understand the methods and instruments employed by the astronomy community. with aas, we have increased our understanding of the community as a whole through regular calls with a working group of astronomers during which we discuss technical details, provide updates, and work on how we can protect astronomical observations moving forward. a post on some of our sessions is here . one particularly useful presentation from a member of this working group is here . while community understanding is critical to this problem, engineering problems are difficult to solve without specifics. the vera c. rubin observatory was repeatedly flagged as the most difficult case to solve, so we've spent the last few months working very closely with a technical team there to do just that. among other useful thoughts and discussions, the vera rubin team has provided a target brightness reduction that we are using to guide our engineering efforts as we iterate on brightness solutions. these technical and community discussions are paired with our existing efforts to make the satellites easier for astronomers to avoid. starlink trajectories are published through space track.org and celestrak.com , which many astronomers use in timing their observations to avoid satellite streaks. we've also started publishing predictive data prior to launch at the request of astronomers. these allow observatories to schedule around the satellites in the first few hours of deployment (as satellites de tumble and enter the network). vera rubin has been described as the limiting case for starlink, due to its enormous aperture and wide field of view. these two characteristics work in concert to produce the perfect storm for satellite observations. most astronomical systems look at an extremely small section of the sky (less than 1 degree), which makes it exceedingly unlikely that a satellite will cross in front of the imaging system in a given observation. on the other hand, systems with very large fields of view normally aren't extremely sensitive, meaning that, while streaks will occur, they will have a small impact on the overall data collection. this is why we've been working so closely with the team at the rubin observatory. in fact, despite its wide field of view, the vera c. rubin observatory is sensitive enough to detect a sunlit golf ball as far away as the moon. so what can we do to mitigate our impact on these edge cases of wide, fast survey telescopes? minimizing the impact on astronomy the huge collecting area of a larger telescopes like vera c. rubin observatory leads to a sensitivity that will render even the darkest satellites visible.they are so sensitive that it won't be possible to build a satellite that will not produce streaks, in a typical long integration. there is much that can be done to reduce the impact of satellite streaks, and that starts with an understanding of how astronomical sensors work. the astronomical community has done a great job of educating us on their imaging techniques. optical systems use mirrors or lenses to focus light onto an imaging sensor. most optical astronomy instruments use sensors called charge coupled devices (ccds) as their detectors because astronomical targets, such as distant supernovae and galaxies, are generally dim at the limit of what can be detected by a sensor. for these applications, the lower noise level of ccds allows for a higher signal to noise ratio for a given image, making it easier to see very faint features in the universe. however, ccds suffer from a key drawback: when compared to other common sensors, like the cmos sensor in your cell phone. if you point your cell phone at a bright light, you'll see all the pixels saturate and turn white in the region of the bright source. if you look at the same target with an optical system that uses a ccd sensor, you'll notice that this bright spot extends to create vertical stripes on the image. this difference is due to the way each sensor type reads the values for each pixel. while a cmos sensor essentially has an amplifier at each pixel that turns the light collected into a digital value, a ccd sensor has a limited number of amplifiers and moves the collected light (in the form of electrons) across the sensor, to be digitized. this mechanism means that a saturated pixel on a ccd tends to wipe out data from an entire column of pixels. this effect, commonly referred to as 'blooming,' is one example of how a very small but bright source of light can impact an astronomical observation. this principle is the core of our mitigation efforts. while it will not be possible to create satellites that are invisible to the most advanced optical equipment on earth, by reducing the brightness of the satellites, we can make the existing strategies for dealing with similar issues, such as frame stacking, dramatically more effective. future satellites spacex is committed to making future satellite designs as dark as possible. the next generation satellite, designed to take advantage of starship's unique launch capabilities, will be specifically designed to minimize brightness while also increasing the number of consumers that it can serve with high speed internet access. while spacex is the first large constellation manufacturer and operator to address satellite brightness, we won't be the last. as launch costs continue to drop, more constellations will emerge and they too will need to ensure that the optical properties of their satellites don't create problems for observers on the ground. this is why we are working to make this problem easier for everyone to solve in the future. spacex and nasa are targeting may 27 for falcon 9’s launch of crew dragon’s second demonstration mission (demo 2) from historic launch complex 39a at nasa’s kennedy space center in florida as part of nasa’s commercial crew program . nasa astronauts bob behnken and doug hurley will be the first two nasa astronauts to fly onboard the dragon spacecraft as part of the demo 2 mission to and from the international space station, which will return human spaceflight to the united states since the space shuttle was retired in 2011. filled with approximately 4,500 pounds of supplies and payloads, dragon launched aboard a falcon 9 rocket on march 6, 2020 from cape canaveral air force station in florida. the dragon spacecraft that supported the crs 20 mission previously supported the crs 10 mission in february 2017 and the crs 16 mission in december 2018. dragon is the only spacecraft currently flying that's capable of returning significant amounts of cargo to earth. the falcon 9 launch vehicle and crew dragon spacecraft that will support demo 2 are onsite at spacex’s facilities in florida. to mark the return of human spaceflight on american rockets from american soil, nasa has revived their worm logo for demo 2 . in preparation for demo 2, spacex has completed a number of major milestones for nasa’s commercial crew program. in march 2019, spacex completed an end to end test flight of crew dragon without nasa astronauts onboard, making dragon the first american spacecraft to autonomously dock with the international space station and safely return to earth. in january 2020, spacex demonstrated crew dragon's in flight launch escape capability to reliably carry crew to safety in the unlikely event of an emergency on the launch pad or at any point during ascent. spacex has completed over 700 tests of the spacecraft's superdraco engines, which fired together at full throttle can power dragon 0.5 miles away from falcon 9 in 7.5 seconds, accelerating the vehicle more than 400 mph. spacex has completed 27 tests of crew dragon’s enhanced mark 3 parachute design, which will provide a safe landing back on earth for astronauts returning from the space station. these tests include 13 successful single parachute drop tests, 12 successful multi parachute tests, and a successful demonstration of the upgraded parachute system during crew dragon’s in flight abort test . additionally, spacex and nasa have jointly executed a series of mission simulations from launch and docking to departure and landing, an end to end demonstration of pad rescue operations , and a fully integrated test of critical crew flight hardware on the demo 2 crew dragon spacecraft with nasa astronauts bob behnken and doug hurley participating in their demo 2 spacesuits. demo 2 is the final major test for spacex’s human spaceflight system to be certified by nasa for operational crew missions to and from the international space station. once demo 2 is complete, and the spacex and nasa teams have reviewed all the data for certification, nasa astronauts victor glover , mike hopkins , shannon walker and jaxa astronaut soichi noguchi have been assigned to fly on dragon’s first six month operational mission (crew 1) targeted for later this year. spacex is returning human spaceflight to the united states with one of the safest, most advanced systems ever built, and nasa’s commercial crew program is a turning point for america’s future in space exploration that lays the groundwork for future missions to the moon, mars, and beyond. on sunday, january 19, spacex successfully completed an in flight test of crew dragon’s launch escape capabilities from launch complex 39a (lc 39a) at nasa’s kennedy space center in florida. this test, which did not have nasa astronauts onboard the spacecraft, demonstrated crew dragon’s ability to reliably carry crew to safety in the unlikely event of an emergency on ascent. falcon 9 and dragon lifted off at 10:30 a.m. est, or 15:30 utc, with the abort sequence initiating approximately one and a half minutes into flight. crew dragon's eight superdraco engines powered the spacecraft away from falcon 9 at speeds of over 400 mph. following separation, dragon's trunk was released and the spacecraft's parachutes were deployed, first the two drogue parachutes followed by the four upgraded mark iii parachutes. dragon safely splashed down in the atlantic ocean and teams successfully recovered the spacecraft onto spacex's recovery vessel. you can watch a replay of launch above and learn more about the mission here . spacex's starship and super heavy launch vehicle is a fully, rapidly reusable transportation system designed to carry both crew and cargo to earth orbit, the moon, mars, and anywhere else in the solar system. on saturday, september 28 at our launch facility in cameron county, texas, spacex chief engineer elon musk provided an update on the design and development of starship. spacex © 2025 privacy policy suppliers

credit cards loans banking mortgages insurance credit monitoring personal finance small business taxes help for low credit scores investing select all credit cards find the credit card for you best credit cards best rewards credit cards best travel credit cards best 0% apr credit cards best balance transfer credit cards best cash back credit cards best credit card welcome bonuses best credit cards to build credit select all loans find the best personal loan for you best personal loans best debt consolidation loans best loans to refinance credit card debt best loans with fast funding best small personal loans best large personal loans best personal loans to apply online best student loan refinance select all banking find the savings account for you best high yield savings accounts best big bank savings accounts best big bank checking accounts best no fee checking accounts no overdraft fee checking accounts best checking account bonuses best money market accounts best cds best credit unions select all mortgages best mortgages best mortgages for small down payment best mortgages for no down payment best mortgages with no origination fee best mortgages for average credit score adjustable rate mortgages affording a mortgage select all insurance best life insurance best homeowners insurance best renters insurance best car insurance travel insurance select all credit monitoring best credit monitoring services best identity theft protection how to boost your credit score credit repair services select all personal finance best budgeting apps best expense tracker apps best money transfer apps best resale apps and sites buy now pay later (bnpl) apps best debt relief select all small business best small business savings accounts best small business checking accounts best credit cards for small business best small business loans best tax software for small business select all taxes filing for free best tax software best tax software for small businesses tax refunds tax brackets tax tips tax by state tax payment plans select all help for low credit scores best credit cards for bad credit best personal loans for bad credit best debt consolidation loans for bad credit personal loans if you don't have credit best credit cards for building credit personal loans for 580 credit score or lower personal loans for 670 credit score or lower best mortgages for bad credit best hardship loans how to boost your credit score select all investing best ira accounts best roth ira accounts best investing apps best free stock trading platforms best robo advisors index funds mutual funds etfs bonds spacex completed a test flight of its starship rocket for the first time on thursday, as the company pushed development of the mammoth vehicle past new milestones. "our first ever ship landing burn after a launch into space ... that was incredible," spacex communications manager dan huot said on the company's broadcast. elon musk's company launched starship at about 8:50 a.m. et from its starbase facility near boca chica, texas. a few minutes after launch, the rocket's booster successfully splashed down in the gulf of mexico, a new milestone for its development. this was the first time spacex returned the booster in one piece   a controlled return of the booster is key to the company's long term goal of being able to launch and land starship regularly, a practice it's made routine with its falcon 9 rockets. about an hour after the launch, starship visibly survived reentry through the earth's atmosphere, and the company confirmed that the rocket splashed down in the indian ocean to complete the mission. starship appeared to withstand external damage during the intense heat of reentry, with debris apparent on the broadcast. "splashdown confirmed!" spacex posted on social media after the flight. there were no people on board the fourth starship spaceflight. the company's leadership has previously emphasized that spacex expects to fly hundreds of starship missions before the rocket launches with any crew. the starship system is designed to be fully reusable and aims to become a new method of flying cargo and people beyond earth. the rocket is also critical to nasa's plan to return astronauts to the moon. spacex won a multibillion dollar contract from the agency to use starship as a crewed lunar lander as part of nasa's artemis moon program. shortly after the flight, nasa administrator bill nelson congratulated spacex on its progress. "we are another step closer to returning humanity to the moon through artemis   then looking onward to mars," nelson wrote in a social media post. spacex has flown the full starship rocket system on three spaceflight tests previously, with launches in april 2023, november and march. each of the test flights has achieved more milestones than the last, but in each result prior to thursday the rocket was destroyed before the flight's end. sign up here to receive weekly editions of cnbc's investing in space newsletter. during the company's third test flight spacex tested new capabilities including opening and closing the payload door once in space   which would be how the rocket deploys payloads such as satellites on future missions   and transferring fuel during the flight in a nasa demonstration. spacex heavily emphasizes an approach of building "on what we've learned from previous flights" in its approach to develop starship. the company says its strategy focuses on "recursive improvement" to the rocket, where even test flights with fiery outcomes represent progress toward its goal of a fully reusable rocket that can deliver people to the moon and mars. musk last year said he expected the company to spend about $2 billion on starship development in 2023. starship is both the tallest and most powerful rocket ever launched. fully stacked on the super heavy booster, starship stands 397 feet tall and is about 30 feet in diameter. the super heavy booster, which stands 232 feet tall, is what begins the rocket's journey to space. at its base are 33 raptor engines, which together produce 16.7 million pounds of thrust   about double the 8.8 million pounds of thrust of nasa's space launch system rocket, which launched for the first time in 2022. starship itself, at 165 feet tall, has six raptor engines   three for use while in the earth's atmosphere and three for operating in the vacuum of space. the rocket is powered by liquid oxygen and liquid methane. the full system requires more than 10 million pounds of propellant for launch. got a confidential news tip? we want to hear from you. sign up for free newsletters and get more cnbc delivered to your inbox get this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. © 2025 cnbc llc. all rights reserved. a division of nbcuniversal data is a real time snapshot *data is delayed at least 15 minutes. global business and financial news, stock quotes, and market data and analysis. data also provided by
supported by the company achieved a key set of ambitious goals on the fourth test flight of a vehicle that is central to elon musk’s vision of sending people to mars. transcript “we have liftoff.” “vehicle is pitching down range.” “the starship remains on a good entry trajectory.” by kenneth chang spacex’s launch of its mammoth starship rocket on thursday accomplished a set of ambitious goals that elon musk, the company’s chief executive, had set out before the test flight, the fourth. lifting off from spacex’s launchpad at 7:50 a.m. in south texas, near brownsville, starship rumbled into the sky. after it dropped away from the upper stage, the booster was able to gently set down in the gulf of mexico while the second stage spacecraft traveled halfway around the world, survived the searing temperatures of re entering the atmosphere and also made a controlled splashdown, in the indian ocean. the flight was not flawless, and tough technical hurdles remain. the successes, surpassing what was accomplished during the previous test flight in march, offered optimism that mr. musk can pull off his vision of a rocket that is the biggest and most powerful ever and yet entirely reusable. the outcome also helps validate the company’s break it then fix it approach to engineering, with steady progress since the first test launch in april last year when the rocket had to be deliberately destroyed when it flew off course. “they are showing a capability to make progress more rapidly than we may have thought they’d been able to make,” said daniel l. dumbacher, executive director of the american institute of aeronautics and astronautics, a professional society for engineers. “they’ve got a team that knows what they’re doing, has the capability is willing to learn, and just as importantly, is not beholden to past assumptions.”

june 6, 2024 4 min read spacex starship blasts through plasma on return from ambitious test flight elon musk’s spacex made a much anticipated fourth test flight of the world’s most powerful rocket, starship, a vehicle designed to power human flight to the moon and mars by mike wall & space.com the spacex starship launches during its fourth flight test from boca chica beach on june 6, 2024, in brownsville, texas. brandon bell/getty images the fourth test flight of the biggest and most powerful rocket ever built is in the books, and what a dramatic and nail biting trip for spacex it was. spacex launched its starship megarocket for the fourth time ever today (june 6) at 8:50 a.m. edt (1250 gmt), sending the 400 foot tall (122 meters) vehicle aloft from its starbase site near boca chica beach in south texas atop a thundering pillar of fire. there were two main goals today: bring starship's first stage booster, known as super heavy, down for a soft splashdown in the gulf of mexico, and achieve a controlled reentry of the 165 foot tall (50 m) upper stage, called starship or simply ship. both the super heavy booster and its ship appeared to make their water landings, sending spectators at spacex's mission control at starbase into a frenzy of cheers. if you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award winning journalism by subscribing. by purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. "this whole building was going absolutely insane," spacex spokesperson dan huot said during live commentary from the company's headquarters in hawthorne, california. "when we saw the booster hit the water, i mean, wow."