For the first point, you could argue that using the right to repair could absolve the company from any injury incurred.

For the second point, you could argue that a functioning, but less efficient device is better than a device that doesn't function at all.

For the third point, you could argue that this point is moot because you can already open any device and reverse-engineer it. Not having a right to repair does not prevent that.
spam fails_task lang_mismatch pii not_appropriate hate_speech sexual_content quality toxicity humor helpfulness creativity violence