During Joseph Scaliger's time, his ideas and contributions to the field of history were widely received with great interest and excitement. His work in chronology was seen as groundbreaking and he was widely regarded as one of the leading scholars of his time. Many contemporary scholars recognized the significance of his work and acknowledged his expertise in the field of history.

However, Scaliger's ideas were not without opposition. Some scholars of his time were skeptical of his chronological system, and some challenged his method of using different sources to establish a universal chronology. There were also those who were resistant to accepting the idea that some of the dates and events in history that had been accepted for centuries might be incorrect.

In addition to scholarly opposition, Scaliger also faced opposition from some religious leaders, who were concerned that his work might challenge traditional religious beliefs and the chronology of biblical events. There were also some who felt that Scaliger was undermining the authority of classical scholars and sources, and that his approach was too focused on accuracy and scientific method, rather than tradition and cultural heritage.

Despite these challenges, Scaliger's work continued to be widely recognized and appreciated. Over time, his ideas became widely accepted, and his contributions to the modern understanding of history have had a lasting impact on the field. Today, his work is still widely regarded as a seminal contribution to the study of history, and his methods and techniques continue to be used by historians and scholars around the world.
spam fails_task lang_mismatch pii not_appropriate hate_speech sexual_content quality toxicity humor helpfulness creativity violence