Below are some examples of good and bad documentation of code review:

Good documentation:

1. Clear and concise: Documentation is clear, concise, and easy to understand. It explains what the code does, how it works, and how it should be used.

2. Well-organized: Documentation is well-organized and easy to navigate. It has clear headings and subheadings, and was broken up into manageable chunks.

3. Includes examples: Documentation includes examples that demonstrate how to use the code.

4. Updated regularly: Documentation is updated regularly to reflect changes to the code. 

Bad documentation:

1. Outdated: Documentation that is outdated or no longer accurate can be confusing and frustrating for users.

2. Incomplete: Incomplete documentation can be frustrating for users who are trying to understand how the code works.

3. Poorly organized: Documentation that is poorly organized can be difficult to navigate and understand. 

4. Lacks examples: Documentation that lacks examples can be difficult to follow. Including examples can make it easier for users to understand how to use the code.
spam fails_task lang_mismatch pii not_appropriate hate_speech sexual_content quality toxicity humor helpfulness creativity violence