Solution 1, which involves rebasing the feature branch onto the latest main branch and force pushing the changes, is generally preferred over Solution 2, which involves merging the main branch into the feature branch using a regular merge. Here are some pros and cons for each method:

Pros of Solution 1 (Rebasing and force pushing):
- Keeps the Git history clean and linear.
- Prevents merge commits from cluttering the Git history.
- Makes it easier to trace changes and find bugs by maintaining a linear history.

Cons of Solution 1:
- May require more work if there are conflicts to resolve when rebasing the feature branch onto the main branch.
- Can be dangerous if other people are also working on the same feature branch.

Pros of Solution 2 (Merging the main branch into the feature branch):
- Preserves the Git history and shows all changes made to the feature branch.
- Avoids conflicts that may arise when rebasing the feature branch onto the main branch.

Cons of Solution 2:
- Can clutter the Git history with unnecessary merge commits.
- Makes it harder to trace changes and find bugs by creating a non-linear history.
spam fails_task lang_mismatch pii not_appropriate hate_speech sexual_content quality toxicity humor helpfulness creativity violence