Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Rapid bursts of androgen-binding protein (Abp) gene duplication occurred independently in diverse mammals

  • 1, 7,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 5 and
  • 6, 8Email author
BMC Evolutionary Biology20088:46

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-46

  • Received: 09 November 2007
  • Accepted: 12 February 2008
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

The draft mouse (Mus musculus) genome sequence revealed an unexpected proliferation of gene duplicates encoding a family of secretoglobin proteins including the androgen-binding protein (ABP) α, β and γ subunits. Further investigation of 14 α-like (Abpa) and 13 β- or γ-like (Abpbg) undisrupted gene sequences revealed a rich diversity of developmental stage-, sex- and tissue-specific expression. Despite these studies, our understanding of the evolution of this gene family remains incomplete. Questions arise from imperfections in the initial mouse genome assembly and a dearth of information about the gene family structure in other rodents and mammals.

Results

Here, we interrogate the latest 'finished' mouse (Mus musculus) genome sequence assembly to show that the Abp gene repertoire is, in fact, twice as large as reported previously, with 30 Abpa and 34 Abpbg genes and pseudogenes. All of these have arisen since the last common ancestor with rat (Rattus norvegicus). We then demonstrate, by sequencing homologs from species within the Mus genus, that this burst of gene duplication occurred very recently, within the past seven million years. Finally, we survey Abp orthologs in genomes from across the mammalian clade and show that bursts of Abp gene duplications are not specific to the murid rodents; they also occurred recently in the lagomorph (rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus) and ruminant (cattle, Bos taurus) lineages, although not in other mammalian taxa.

Conclusion

We conclude that Abp genes have undergone repeated bursts of gene duplication and adaptive sequence diversification driven by these genes' participation in chemosensation and/or sexual identification.

Keywords

  • Genome Assembly
  • Mouse Genome
  • Trace Archive
  • Murid Rodent
  • Independent Expansion

Background

Approximately 90% of genes in the dog (Canis familiaris), mouse (Mus musculus), and human (Homo sapiens) genomes have been preserved without duplication, disruption or deletion, since their last common ancestors [1, 2]. The remaining ~10% of genes, representing the volatile portion of the mammalian gene complement, in general possess functions that are very different from those of the conserved gene set: they are substantially enriched in functions contributing to chemosensation, reproduction, immunity, host defense and toxin degradation [3]. Moreover, gene families, such as those containing olfactory or vomeronasal receptors, immunoglobulin domain-containing proteins, or cytochromes P450 that are expanded in one lineage are often expanded in another. This likely reflects similar evolutionary responses to similar environmental challenges.

Some among us contributed to initial analyses of the draft mouse genome assembly [2] by identifying mouse-specific gene duplications that remained unduplicated in the human genome. We argued that such genes contribute disproportionately to biology that is specific to the rodent lineage [3]. One of these mouse-specific clusters includes homologs of the α-subunit of the androgen-binding protein (ABP) which was of particular interest owing to evidence that ABP mediates sexual selection in mice [4, 5]. Others among us have investigated the biochemical, genetic, molecular and physiological functions, and evolution of ABP molecules since the 1980s. These investigations revealed that the ABP heterodimer consists of an α-subunit (encoded by the Abpa gene), disulfide-bridged to either a β- or a γ-subunit (encoded by Abpb or Abpg; [6, 7]), and that Abp genes evolved rapidly, potentially because of positive selection [711]. In common with all other members of the secretoglobin family to which they belong, ABP subunits have not unequivocally been assigned molecular functions [1215].

Upon combining our research efforts, we first performed a more detailed comparative analysis of Abp gene orthologs in the mouse, rat (Rattus norvegicus), chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and human draft genome assemblies [8]. These analyses established that Abp sequences, present within human and chimpanzee regions of conserved synteny, have acquired disruptions to their reading frames and these are highly likely to be pseudogenes. Mouse Abp genes appear to have been subject to positive selection with coding sequences acquiring greater numbers of nucleotide substitutions than their introns. Surprisingly, mouse Abpa and Abpbg genes were found all to be monophyletic with respect to families of orthologs from either rat or wood mouse (Apodemus). This is consistent with multiple duplications of Abpa and Abpbg genes occurring independently in each of the mouse, rat and Apodemus lineages, and with the genome of the last ancestor common to rodents and primates containing only single versions of Abpa and Abpbg genes. It is also consistent with the presence, in the cat genome, of single adjacent Abpa and Abpbg orthologs, whose protein products form a heterodimer termed Fel dI [16]. In a subsequent study, we investigated the spatiotemporal expression of seventeen Abp genes, and concluded that differential expression patterns of mouse Abp genes reflect an animal's gender and sexual maturity status [17].

The mouse genome assembly is substantially improved: it is now essentially complete and is of high accuracy (Mouse Genome Sequence Finishing Consortium, submitted). The draft mouse genome previously analyzed (NCBI build 30, mm3; [8] contained four large (>5 kb) gaps, into which we now realize fall many hitherto unrecognized Abpa and Abpbg paralogues. We were interested in whether these paralogues arose more rapidly than the genome-wide average, for primates and rodents, of 1 duplicate gene fixed per hundred million years [18].

In the absence of genome sequences from more closely related species, we sequenced Abpa homologs from three Mus musculus subspecies (M. m. domesticus, M. m. musculus and M. m. castaneus) and three other species within the genus Mus (M. spretus, M. caroli, and M. pahari – see Fig. 1 for a phylogeny). M. musculus and M. spretus represent the Palearctic clade, M. caroli is an Asian species serving as an outgroup to the Palearctic species, whereas Mus pahari (a.k.a. Coelomys; [19]) serves as an outgroup to the subgenus Mus; these species all diverged from a common ancestor more than seven million years ago [20]. Our finding of single M. pahari orthologs of multiple Mus musculus Abpa genes thus supports the rapid duplication of these Mus genes within the last seven million years.

As the common ancestor of murid rodents appeared to contain only a single pair of Abp genes and because gene duplication events are relatively rare, we predict that single Abpa-like and Abpbg-like genes will also be present in the genomes of most other eutherian mammals, and of metatherians, such as the opossum (Monodelphis domestica). The recent availability of draft assemblies of many species' genomes [21] provides an opportunity to investigate this prediction. While our methodology provides slight underestimates of the numbers of Abpa and Abpbg paralogues and precludes definitive assignment of predicted sequences as genes or pseudogenes, here we report identification of the expected single pair of Abpa and Abpbg genes in genome assemblies for multiple diverse mammals. Interestingly, we identified considerably more such paralogues in two mammals, rabbit and cattle, hinting that Abp genes have been the substrate for frequent duplication in lineages beyond the murid rodents.

Results

Rodent gene predictions and nomenclature

We revisited the Abp region of the mouse (C57BL/6J strain) genome sequence considering that a recent assembly (mm8; February 2006) might contain genes that had been hidden within the gaps of the 2002 initial draft assembly (mm2). We report that this region is now free of sequence gaps. By comparing new (mm8) and old (mm2) genome assemblies we identified 41 Abp genes in a large (~1.8 Mb) contiguous segment that had presented difficulties when originally assembled (Figure 2). The mouse Abp gene region is now seen to be 3 Mb in size, approximately twice as large as previously estimated, and 6-fold larger than estimated for the orthologous region in rat [8].

Abp genes were originally described as Abpa (alpha subunit; A), Abpb (beta subunit; B) and Abpg (gamma subunit; G), based on the identification of the three ABP subunits in two different dimeric combinations: AB and AG [6]. The three genes were mapped on the proximal end of mouse chromosome 7 in a study that also demonstrated that Abpb and Abpg are closely related, both in exon/intron structure and in sequence [7]. When it became apparent that multiple copies of Abpa and of Abpb/Abpg exist in the genomes of mouse and rat, with 5'-5' orientations of pairs of Abpa and Abpbg, the nomenclature was modified to represent Abpb and Abpg as Abpbg genes [8].

The mouse Abp region contains a total of 30 Abpa and 34 Abpbg genes or pseudogenes (see Additional files 1 &2 for cDNA sequences and gene locations), over twice the numbers we reported previously [8]. In the report that follows, we distinguished the Abpa paralogues obtained from the mouse genome from those we derived from wild-derived rodent taxa by designating them "B6" (an abbreviation of C57BL/6, the source strain for the mouse genome project). New B6 paralogues reported here are designated in bold typeface. Twelve of the 30 Abpa genes and 19 of the 34 Abpbg genes have missense or nonsense mutations in an exon, while four Abpa and three Abpbg paralogues have non-canonical splice sites (all marked as pseudogenes on Figure 2; details in Additional file 2). We recognize that pseudogenes that possess full-length open reading frames are mis-assigned as functional genes by this method. It is also possible that one or more of those we have designated pseudogenes could be expressed. Of note is the paralogue B6_bg2 (previously numbered Abpbg 2 [8]), which has a deletion eliminating a conserved stop codon that allows the protein sequence to be extended by two extra amino-acid residues before ending in a non-conserved stop codon. We have assigned this paralogue gene status because we have identified transcripts by RT-PCR for this gene in numerous tissues [17] and have found at least 10 Mus musculus ESTs for this slightly longer version in the Mus musculus EST database (CK616889 and others). Others working on Swiss-Webster mice reported a different change at the 3' end of this paralogue (AY370634), supporting the possibility of strain-specific polymorphisms within this gene.

Consistent with previous observations, the majority of the newly-predicted genes are located in Abpa-Abpbg pairs, and are likely to be transcribed in opposite, head-to-head (i.e. 5'-5') arrangements. Our original gene sequence and pair assignments are likewise essentially unchanged from our initial report [8]. We number the Abpa and Abpbg paralogues by their sequential occurrence in Abpa-Abpbg gene pairs along the chromosome (i.e., B6_Abpa1-B6_Abpbg 1, B6_a2-B6_bg2, etc.; Figure 2) despite this resulting in the reassignment of some gene names (see Additional file 2 for current and previous designations).

The Abp gene cluster in other rodent taxa

The most recent rat genome assembly (rn4; November 2004) contains only three Abpa-Abpbg gene pairs in a region spanning ~0.2 Mb of chromosome 1 (RNO1), which is ten times fewer than the Abp genes distributed over ~3 Mb of the syntenic region of mouse chromosome 7 (MMU7). Originally, we reported that one of the six rat paralogues was a pseudogene [8]. However, we have since discovered a cDNA with a single base sequence change in that gene which eliminates a frameshift mutation resulting from an additional A nucleotide in a run of A's (Laukaitis and Karn, unpublished). Although this region of the rat genome assembly contains many gaps (including 5 contig gaps) there is no evidence, as there was for previous mouse assemblies, from unplaced genomic and cDNA sequences for additional Abp gene paralogues.

A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the second introns (of length ~800 bp) available from the mouse (genome: "B6"), rat (genome), Apodemus, M. m. domesticus, M. m. musculus, M. m. castaneus, M. spretus, M. caroli and M. pahari (Figure 3; see Additional file 3 for intron sequences). As noted in Materials and Methods, this is the first report of intron sequences from Apodemus. The Abpa genes in Mus musculus, Apodemus and Rattus cluster separately into three monophyletic clades, indicating that the mouse, Apodemus and rat Abp gene complements arose by duplication independently from single Abpa or Abpbg genes in the last common ancestor; this is consistent with our previous results [8]. However, whether these rodent Abp gene duplications were relatively contemporaneous, or whether they were more uniformly distributed over time, remained unclear.

To deduce the pace of gene duplication in the Mus musculus lineage, we used PCR to obtain Abpa gene sequences in closely-related rodent species (see lineage in Figure 1). Thereafter, we used Southern blotting to interrogate genomic DNA from different rodent taxa using Abpa probes from M. m. domesticus and M. pahari paralogues. We chose to focus on Abpa genes, because extensive repeats of single bases in Abpbg introns ([7] and Karn, unpublished) make it difficult to amplify and sequence. Since most Abpa genes are paired with single Abpbg genes, our results are also relevant to Abpbg genes. The effectiveness of each of these methods necessarily depends on the evolutionary divergence between Abpa probe sequences and the other rodent taxa being studied. Such approaches resulted in the identification and partial sequencing of two Abpa genes in M. pahari, six in M. caroli, and five each in M. spretus, M. m. castaneus, M. m. musculus, and M. m. domesticus.

By manually reconciling the known species phylogeny (Figure 1) with a phylogeny of these genes and pseudogenes (Figure 3), we deduce that many of the 30 mouse genome Abpa genes and pseudogenes arose by duplications within the Mus subgenus clade. The basal positions of each of the Rattus, Apodemus or M. pahari clades indicate that the last common ancestor of Mus, Apodemus, and Rattus contained only one Abpa gene. The last common ancestor of the Mus subgenus with M. pahari contained at minimum two and at maximum five Abpa genes since the Abpa genes from the Mus subgenus (M. m. musculus, M. m. domesticus, M. m. castaneus, M. spretus, and M. caroli) form five well-separated clades, and each of the two M. pahari Abpa genes serves as an outgroup to one of these clades.

The six Abpa genes from M. caroli, the most distant species of those we investigated in the subgenus Mus, are all outgroups to the other Abpa (pseudo)genes from the subgenus. For all but two of these genes, the branching order is consistent with the species phylogeny without lineage-specific duplication events. For M. caroli Abpa7, the branching order supports the origin of eight mouse genome in-paralogues (B6_ a7 , a11 , a12 , a13 , a18 , a19 , a20 and a2 9; these are all newly reported here except B6_a2 9 which was previously referred to as Abpa13 [8]) after the splitting of the M. caroli and M. musculus lineages (Figure 3). We calculate that these duplication events occurred between 400,000 and 2.8 million years ago, although the low divergences for introns from some of these paralogues suggest even more recent duplication events. We considered, and eventually discarded, the possibility that gene conversion has caused the low divergence of these intron sequences. For the B6_a27 clade (previously reported as Abpa11[8] and, originally, Abpa [6]), two M. caroli paralogues cluster as outgroups, suggesting a M. caroli-specific duplication event. B6 duplications within this clade occurred between 1 and 7 million years ago.

Southern blotting

The patterns produced by probing Southern transfers of DNA from the three subspecies of M. musculus with a variety of Abpa-derived probes are essentially indistinguishable, independent of probe or subspecies (Figure 4). This consistency suggests that much of the extensive Abp gene expansion seen in the C57BL/6J genome ([8] and this paper) was present in the common ancestor of these subspecies approximately 0.5 MYA. Pattern intensity was reduced dramatically in more distant taxa of the subgenus Mus, especially at higher stringency levels, reflecting sequence divergence. Bands in three taxa outside the subgenus Mus (M. pahari, the outgroup to the subgenus; Apodemus, the outgroup to the genus Mus; and Rattus, the most distantly related, Figure 4A), were faint at low stringency and disappeared altogether as stringency was increased.

The two M. pahari genes we identified allowed us to develop Southern blotting probes to further investigate the relationship of M. pahari paralogues to those discovered in the subgenus Mus. Two separate experiments, using probes developed from each of the M. pahari paralogues, produced nearly identical patterns of eight bands in the M. pahari lane and few or no bands in other taxa (Figure 4B). Conversely, probing M. pahari genomic DNA with the M. m. domesticus probes revealed only one band, again reflecting sequence divergence between genes from the taxa. The Apodemus and Rattus lanes contained no distinguishable bands at higher stringency, as was the case when probed with M. m. domesticus probes.

Abp genes found in the genomes of other mammals

We previously predicted that the last common ancestors of mouse and rat, and of mouse and human, possessed only a single pair of Abpa-Abpbg genes [8]. We sought to test this prediction by identifying Abp genes in the available assembled genome sequences of seventeen additional mammalian species that sample divergent eutherian lineages, one metatherian, and one monotreme species [22]. Abpa or Abpbg orthologs were identified for 12 of these species (Figure 5; see Additional files 1 &2 for cDNA sequences and contig assignments). Supporting our prediction, no more than a single Abpa or Abpbg gene was found for ground squirrel and guinea pig, both of which are rodents. Similarly, single gene pairs, at most, were found for four species (little brown bat, horse, dog, and cat) whose lineages arose prior to the last common ancestor of primates and rodents. We conclude the earliest eutherian possessed only a single pair of Abpa and Abpbg genes.

The last common ancestor of the eutherian and metatherian lineages 180 MYA possessed both Abpa and Abpbg genes. Three Abpa and three Abpbg subfamily members are evident in the metatherian Monodelphis genome sequence although many of these, owing to their divergence, were unable to be predicted in their entireties. Two Monodelphis Abpa genes appear to have arisen from duplication within the metatherian lineage, as evidenced by their relatively low divergence at synonymous sites (KS = 0.06). Abp genes, on the other hand, were not detected in the draft platypus genome, but we cannot exclude that sequence divergence disfavours their prediction using the methods we employed. Alternatively, Abp genes may simply lie within the ~10% of its genome that is absent from the current assembly.

By way of contrast, the genomes of two further species each contain independent expansions of Abp genes. The rabbit genome assembly contains 43 Abpa or Abpbg sequences, whereas the cattle genome assembly contains 18 such homologs. Abpa-Abpbg gene pairs are observed in head-to-head (5'-5') arrangements on 7 and 4 occasions within cattle and rabbit contig sequences. Rabbit gene paralogues are more closely related (maximum KS = 0.16) than they are to closely-related orthologs in other species (guinea pig or squirrel minimum KS = 0.78 and KS = 0.97, respectively). Similarly, cattle paralogues are more closely related (maximum KS = 0.49) to each other, than they are to their dog or cat orthologs (minimum KS = 0.74 and 0.51, respectively). We infer, therefore, that expansions of Abp genes have occurred independently in the cattle and rabbit lineages.

In the macaque genome assembly, we were able to identify neither an Abpbg exon 1 (which is all that is discernible in the human and chimpanzee genome assemblies [8]), nor an Abpa gene. Although it remains possible that Abpa and Abpbg genes or pseudogenes fall into gaps that are present in the syntenic region of the current macaque genome assembly, evidence for these homologues was also not forthcoming from searches of the macaque trace sequence reads. We are yet unable, therefore, to delineate definitively the time-points in the primate lineage at which Abpa and Abpbg genes acquired deleterious mutations.

We determined that the numbers of Abp genes present in the 2-fold coverage genome assemblies represented reliable estimates and were not adversely affected by large-scale duplications confounding the accurate assembly of trace sequence reads. For each species we aligned the nucleotide sequences of Abpa genes' second exons with all available trace sequences using MegaBLAST. For those 2-fold coverage genome assemblies (for armadillo, tree shrew, squirrel, microbat and cat) with only single Abpa (pseudo)genes, only 5.6 traces on average (range 2–14), were returned (representing, on average, 6.4 × 10-7 of sequences in the trace archive for these species). For rabbit, by contrast, 140 traces were returned, on average (representing 1.5 × 10-5 of rabbit sequences in the trace archive). The trace archive thus contains evidence for approximately 20-fold more Abpa genes or pseudogenes in the rabbit genome than present in the genomes of tree shrew, squirrel, microbat and cat despite these all, including rabbit, having been sequenced at 2-fold coverage. Further evaluation to confirm ascertainment of all gene copies by synteny-based methods is not possible with low-coverage genomes owing to contigs not being placed on chromosomes.

Positive selection on Abpa and Abpbg paralogs in various species

The presence of sites under positive selection was established for either Abpa or Abpbg genes from all mammals we considered, using a log likelihood ratio test comparing paired models M7/M8 and M1/M2 (see Additional file 4). Tests for positive selection were significant for both paired models for Abpbg genes (P < 10-18). We were especially interested to learn whether positively selected sites ("ω+sites") in one lineage map onto equivalent sites in other lineages. For Abpbg paralogues among all species investigated, we identified 34 ω+ sites (Figure 6B). Of these, 21 are coincident with the sites we described previously for mouse Abpbg genes [8], 13 sites have not been observed previously, and seven of the original 28 sites found in mouse Abpbg paralogues were not found in this analysis. Considering Abpbg paralogues only from the mouse genome, 16 of 19 sites are coincident with those we described previously [8]. For cattle Abpbg paralogues, we found 10 ω+ sites, four of which are shared with mouse. Two rabbit Abpbg ω+ sites were found, one of which is shared with mouse. For Abpa paralogues (Figure 6A), we were unable to detect strong evidence of positive selection: M1/M2 test did not show evidence of selection (P > 0.25), while the M7/M8 test was highly significant (P < 10-23). One of the three potentially positively-selected sites on Abpa is consistent with [8] (Figure 6A). Sites undergoing positive selection were mapped onto the protein structure of cat allergen Fel dI [16]. Consistent with previous results [8], positively-selected sites were located almost exclusively on the molecules' surface and away from the dimerization interface (see Additional files 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 for locations of selected sites).

Expression of Abp paralogues

We searched for ESTs corresponding to each of the 30 Abpa and 34 Abpbg paralogues we report here. Each of nine Abpa sequences and nine Abpbg sequences corresponded to at least one report of an EST detected in at least one tissue (Table 1). Given the large number of mouse Abp paralogues, it is surprising that we were able to find ESTs corresponding to so few of them. Nonetheless, some of the new Abp paralogues we report finding in the mm8 mouse genome build are among these (B6_ a3 , B6_ a7 , B6_ bg7 , B6_ a12 , B6_ bg12 , B6_ a20 , B6_ bg20). The a27, bg27 and bg26 paralogues correspond to the alpha, beta and gamma subunits of ABP, respectively, originally discovered and described by Karn and his colleagues as expressed in mouse salivary glands [2325] and subsequently shown to be under the control of independent genes [6, 7, 9] located on mouse chromosome 7. The other paralogues are associated with ESTs expressed variously in brain olfactory lobe [17], lacrimal gland [17, 26], major olfactory epithelium [17], ovary [17], prostate [17, 27], testis [28], skin [29] and vomeronasal organ [17], however no corresponding proteins have yet been described.

Discussion

The Abp gene region within the finished mouse genome assembly

The finished mouse genome assembly (mm8) establishes the ~3 Mb Abp gene region as one of the most rapidly-evolving genomic sequences known. Compared with the rat, with which it shared a last common ancestor only approximately 12–24 MYA [30, 31], the region has expanded 6-fold and has accumulated, by multiple duplication events, 10-fold more Abpa or Abpbg (pseudo)genes (Figure 2). The large number of evolutionarily very recent duplications generated many virtually identical sequence regions that proved impossible to assemble for the initial mouse draft genome (mm2).

Although we have, thus far, only considered gene duplication, the homogeneity of Abpa genes we observe might also have arisen because of non-allelic gene conversion, as previously observed for interferon-alpha [32] and globin [33] genes, for example. Nevertheless, we discount this explanation by inspecting the phylogenetic tree of ribosomal protein L23a pseudogenes (see Additional file 10), which frequently appear to have co-duplicated with Abpa-Abpbg gene pairs (Figure 2); these duplications are of recent origin since similar sequences are absent from the syntenic region in the rat. As the phylogenies of the pseudogenes and their associated Abp genes (Figure 3) are topologically equivalent, Abpa-Abpbg gene pairs appear to have arisen primarily by duplication, presumably via non-allelic homologous recombination, rather than by sequence homogenization after non-allelic gene conversion events. Despite expectations that mammalian genes are duplicated and fixed once every 100 million years, and acquire inactivating mutations after approximately 7 million years [18], we observe a highly-unusual expansion of a gene family from 5 to 30 members within only 7 million years.

We previously observed expression of six Abpa paralogues and five Abpbg paralogues in ten glands and other organs located predominantly in the head and neck (olfactory lobe of the brain, three salivary glands, lacrimal gland, Harderian gland, vomeronasal organ, and major olfactory epithelium; [17]). We positively identified PCR products in this expression study by comparing their sequences to those of the paralogues from which the primers were developed. Nonetheless, because the new paralogues' sequences are often closely-related to those used to develop the expression primers, we identified, using the UCSC genome browser's in silico PCR resource (February 2006 assembly), which of the new paralogues that would have been amplified with these primers, were they expressed. Only the original Abpa13 (now B6_a29) primer pair [17] amplified additional paralogues beyond that for which they were designed. The Abpa13 primers amplified two new B6 Abpa paralogues in the in silico PCR experiment (B6_a7 and B6_a20). However, the sequencing check of the PCR products in that study (described above) did not provide evidence that these new paralogues were expressed in any of the tissues that were positive for the original Abpa13 paralogue. Thus the results and conclusions reported in our original report [17] do not appear to warrant revision.

Expression of Abp paralogues

We find evidence for expression of nine Abpa and nine Abpbg paralogues that are nearly equally divided between paralogues we originally reported [8, 17] and new ones reported here (Table 1). Most expressed paralogs are found in pairs, where both partners of the pair are expressed. Surprisingly, we identified non-canonical splice sites in four paralogues previously amplified from cDNA collections by RT-PCR (B6_bg3, B6_a21, B6_bg25 and B6_a26; previously Abpbg12, Abpa5, Abpbg9, and Abpa10 [8]) and two newly-reported paralogues (B6_ bg3 and B6_ a26). We found a single incident of non-canonical splice site changes in other taxa where the Mus spretus paralogue, spr a26, has the same non-canonical GT-AG change at the beginning of its second intron as B6_a26. More difficult to interpret are the ESTs (CN843804.1 and BY706510) that others have reported for B6_bg23 in testis, because the genome sequence for that paralogue has an early termination codon in the coding region. We aligned the B6_bg23 coding region with those EST sequences and verified the early termination codon in both ESTs (not shown). These unusual changes could be strain-specific changes (e.g. between C3H/HeJ and C57BL6/J) or very new pseudogenization events where control regions have not yet acquired mutations that silence transcription. Either scenario would illustrate the rapid speed at which evolution has shaped this region.

Expansion of the Mus musculus gene cluster is rooted at the level of the subgenus Mus

We combined computational data with two experimental methods to explore the origin of the complexity of the Abp gene cluster within rodent taxa. Paralogue sequences derived from the mouse genome could not be definitively assigned to a single subspecies because of multiple M. musculus subspecies contributions to the C57BL/6J genome [34, 35]. Thus, we used PCR-based gene finding data to determine sequences for many (although certainly not all) Abpa paralogues in the genus Mus. Evolutionary analysis of these sequences groups the two M. pahari paralogues as outgroups of clades formed by paralogues of the subgenus Mus. Neither of the two paralogues that we found in Apodemus nor any of the three Abpa genes found in the rat genome shows this property, suggesting that the impressive gene family expansion seen in Mus musculus began in an ancestor common to M. pahari and the subgenus Mus. Further, interrogating Southern blots with probes developed from the two M. pahari paralogues revealed other M. pahari paralogues that were not seen when the blots were probed with M. m. domesticus probes and that were not discovered in the PCR-based gene finding experiments. These could reflect an expansion of the Abpa gene cluster that is, at least in part, unique to M. pahari. This suggests that the common ancestor of M. pahari and the subgenus Mus possessed a cluster of genes, some of which may have been duplicated separately in both the subgenus Mus and M. pahari lineages and some of which may have been expanded in the M. pahari lineage alone. In the event that their sequences become available, the additional bands in M. pahari Southern blots may be associated with other clusters of subgenus Mus paralogues. While there may be as yet undiscovered Apodemus lineage-specific paralogues, these would not be close relatives of Mus genes owing to our inability to detect them by either of the methods we used.

The genome of the last common ancestor of Mus and M. pahari harbored only approximately five Abpa genes. This conclusion is drawn from the branching orders of the two sequenced M. pahari Abpa genes and the 30 mouse genome Abpa genes and pseudogenes (Figure 2; Figure 3). Of five clades, two possess M. pahari genes as outgroups, flanking numerous Mus-specific genes as ingroups. The genes from each of the five clades lie in contiguous genomic sequence (Figure 2) implying that sequence duplications of Abpa (and, by inference, their partner Abpbg genes) generated neighboring tandem duplications. From the Abpa phylogeny (Figure 3), and from their order on the chromosome (Figure 2), we predict that of the five Abpa genes predicted to be in the common ancestor of Mus and M. pahari one duplicated to generate B6_a1 and B6_a2 (formerly Abpa1 and Abpa2 [8]), a second duplicated on numerous occasions leading to B6_ a3 - 23 (all herein are new paralogues except B6_a21-23 which were previously numbered as Abpa5-7 [8]) and B6_a28-29 (previously Abpa12 and Abpa13), a third and a fourth (corresponding to B6_a24 and B6_a25; formerly Abpa8 and Abpa9 [8]) remained unduplicated, and the fifth duplicated to yield B6_a26-27 and B6_a30 (formerly Abpa10-11 and Abpa14 [8]), all in the Mus lineage and within an estimated time span of 7 MY.

Deletion, as well as duplication, events are likely to have shaped this region of the mouse genome. Establishing evidence for this is more problematic for unassembled genomes for which it is unknown whether the absence of a gene represents a deletion or simply a lack of sequencing of that region. However, we reject the possibility that rapid birth and death (pseudogenisation) processes are sufficient to explain our striking finding of independent expansions. First, searches of the trace server archives failed to find additional sequences whose high duplication content confounds assembly. Second, the ability of our prediction algorithms to identify divergent genes and pseudogenes (KS > 0.97 between rabbit genes and their single ortholog) in distant species provides confidence in their ability to identify even rapidly evolving genes. Third, we have found evidence for retained, but potentially pseudogenized genes that have changed splice sites. Thus, the speed of evolution of this genomic region would not be expected to result in removal of all inactive paralogous gene copies. Nevertheless, in those lineages that have experienced much gene duplication, it is likely that many deletions of genes, by non-allelic homologous recombination, have also occurred.

The picture arising from these data suggests a fascinating scenario in which Abp duplications occurred independently in the three lineages leading to Rattus, to Apodemus and to Mus. This was followed by a more complex evolutionary history in the genus Mus, in which at least two Abpa genes further duplicated to produce additional paralogues in the subgenus Mus lineage while other paralogues duplicated independently in the M. pahari lineage. Additionally interesting points include: 1) M. caroli appears to have duplicated its Abpa27 paralogue independently of the other species, suggesting that unique gene duplications may have taken place in some lineages of the subgenus; 2) An orthologue of Abpa30 was observed in each species we investigated, in spite of the fact that it is one of the few Abpa paralogues unpaired with an Abpbg in the mouse genome and is a pseudogene; 3) The M. m. musculus Abpa27 paralogue unexpectedly lies outside the M. spretus node. This was described previously by Karn et al. [11], who noted an unexpected resemblance between the Palearctic species (M. m. musculus excluded) when comparing divergence levels between an Abpa intron and single copy number DNA. They hypothesized that this pattern was due to secondary genetic exchanges along the lineages leading to the Palearctic species.

Independent expansions of Abp have occurred in non-rodent taxa

Our prediction of Abp genes in Monodelphis demonstrates that these were not a eutherian invention, but were present in the last common ancestor of eutherians and metatherians, approximately 180 MYA. The presence of, at most, one Abpa or Abpbg gene in most eutherian genomes is most parsimoniously explained by only single versions of these genes in the genome of the earliest eutherian mammal. This single Abpa-Abpbg gene pair appears to have been conserved in active form in most mammalian lineages (e.g., cat and dog), but was silenced by pseudogenization in primates (represented in this study by bushbaby, chimpanzee and human). By contrast, Abp evolutionary history in Mus, Rattus, Apodemus, rabbit and cattle lineages is characterized by rapid and independent expansions of these gene families by gene duplication, with some of the paralogues remaining active and some likely being silenced.

We believe it unlikely that the large numbers of gene predictions in the rabbit assembly arose solely because of errors arising from two-fold statistical coverage. The nucleotide error rate and heterozygosity present in the animals sequenced, taken together, are insufficient to explain the high number of sequence-different paralogues we found. Indeed, the ~74% genome sampling from two-fold coverage sequencing [36] should result in an under-estimate, not an over-estimate, of the gene count. Finally, in this study we have inspected a large number [13] of two-fold coverage genome sequences, all of which have been sequenced and assembled using similar methods, and yet for these we often observe either one or no paralogues. In particular, we discount the possibility that the two-fold coverage genome of rabbit might, by chance, have sampled a single locus to generate a total of 38 sequence-distinct Abpa sequences (Figure 5).

Mouse is the only organism in which an extensive survey of Abp gene expression has been performed [17]. Expression of many Abpa and Abpbg paralogues were noted, primarily in glands of the face and neck. Expression in the organs otherwise appeared to be restricted to prostate and ovaries; only a single EST has been found in mouse skin. The single Abpa/Abpbg gene pairs in the house cat (Fel dI; [37]) and, possibly, the dog [38] are expressed in salivary glands and sebaceous glands of the skin. Both the cat [39] and the mouse [5] coat their pelts with Abp during grooming. Cattle Abp sequences and similar sequences in sheep and goat have been found in skin EST libraries (see Additional file 11). Skin glands are known to be pheromone sources in cattle [40] and the minimal Abp gene expression in mouse skin suggests that this source has been supplanted in rodents by the complex, multi-gland expression in the face and neck [17]. ABP thus provides the potential to present an olfactory profile for an animal of the same or a closely related species. In primates, however, these genes are conspicuously silent, suggesting a shift to a reliance on visual cues.

It is clear that Abp genes have diverged widely through evolutionary time, both in sequence and in gene copy number, and remain under the influence of positive selection, which has shaped the gene family in rodents. Other gene families shaped by positive selection include those involved in chemosensation, pathogen defense and sexual identification [3]. We previously proposed that Abp is involved in chemosensation and/or sexual identification [4, 5]. Different organisms have devised different physiological mechanisms for accomplishing this function [41] and this is reflected in the evolutionary history of the relevant genes (e.g., lineage-specific duplications in V1R vomeronasal receptors [4244]). Both the finding of different positively-selected sites in different organisms with Abp expansions, as well as the independent gene duplication events, reflect the effect these diverse mechanisms of evolutionary adaptation have exerted on Abpa.

Conclusion

We identified 30 Abpa and 34 Abpbg genes or pseudogenes in a 3 Mb region of mouse chromosome 7. These genes occur in pairs that have arisen primarily by independent bursts of tandem duplication from approximately five Abp genes found in the last common ancestor of the subgenus Mus. At least one Abpa and Abpbg gene was present in the last common ancestor of eutherians and metatherians, approximately 180 MYA, and this single Abpa-Abpbg gene pair has been conserved in active form in most mammalian lineages, but was silenced by pseudogenization in primates. By contrast, Abp evolutionary history in Mus, Rattus, Apodemus, rabbit and cattle lineages is characterized by rapid and independent expansions of these gene families by gene duplication, with some of the paralogues remaining active and some likely becoming silenced. Abp genes have diverged widely through evolutionary time, both in sequence and in gene copy number, and remain under the influence of positive selection.

Methods

Predicting Abpa and Abpbg genes from the finished mm8 mouse genome assembly

Using CLUSTALW [45], we constructed multiple sequence alignments of genomic DNA encompassing the previously known mouse Abpa or Abpbg genes. These two alignments were unambiguous owing to the low divergences among these paralogues. In order to predict additional genes, hidden Markov models [46] were constructed from these alignments and then compared against both strands of the mouse and rat Abp genomic regions (mm8 for mouse; rn4 for rat). Unusually, the prediction of highly divergent Abp coding exons is greatly assisted by the lower divergence of neighboring intronic sequence [8]. High scoring alignments were re-aligned against the previous multiple sequence alignments. Manual curation of multiple genomic DNA sequence alignments was performed to ensure: (a) that the third exon, containing only a short portion of rapidly evolving coding sequence, was predicted correctly and without exons from different loci being inadvertently joined in erroneous gene predictions, and (b) that we were able to identify splice site consensus dinucleotides.

Predicting Abpa and Abpbg genes from other mammalian genome assemblies

The following 17 genome sequence assemblies were also searched for the presence of Abpa or Abpbg orthologous genes: Guinea pig (Cavia porcellus); Ground squirrel (Spermophilus tridecemlineatus); European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus); Tree Shrew (Tupaia belangeri); Bushbaby (Otolemur garnetti); Common Shrew (Sorex araneus); European hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus); Little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus); Cattle (Bos taurus) at 7.1-fold coverage [47]; Cat (Felis catus); Dog (Canis familiaris) at 7.6-fold coverage; Nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus); Lesser hedgehog (tenrec; Echinops telfairi); African savannah elephant (Loxodonta africana); Horse (Equus caballus) at 6.8-fold coverage; South American opossum (Monodelphis domestica) at 6.5-fold coverage; and Duck-billed platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus) at 6-fold coverage [48]. Except where indicated, these data were obtained from the Broad Institute, MA [49] and represent approximately 2-fold statistical coverage of the genomes. To these, we added our findings on mouse, Apodemus, rat, human, chimpanzee, and macaque (Macaca mulatta) making a total of 23 species. For a phylogeny of these mammalian species (excepting horse) see Margulies et al. [22].

Abpa and Abpbg transcripts in these genomes were predicted on the basis of homology to a set of template protein sequences (see below) using the program Exonerate [50]. Transcript prediction proceeded in two steps: (1) Genomic regions containing putative transcripts of Abp were identified first using Exonerate in heuristic mode (options: – maxintron 50000 – proteinwordthreshold 3 – proteinhspdropoff 5 – proteinwordlen 5 – score 80); and, (2) Transcripts were then predicted using Exonerate in Genewise mode (-exhaustive) in all regions identified in step 1, but extended by 150 kb on either side. Identical predictions of transcripts were removed and overlapping transcripts were combined into individual genes.

For each genome, prediction of Abp genes was initiated with experimentally well-established mouse α and β/γ peptide reference sequences (NP_987098, NP_033726, NP_919319, and NP_840093). After a first round of gene prediction, predictions arising from all species' genomes were added to these four reference sequences (above), and the entire process of gene prediction was repeated. Parameters used for Exonerate searches were optimized specifically for Abp gene predictions resulting, for each species, in sequences with matched intron-exon boundaries. Further manual intervention ensured, for example, that dog predictions were orthologous to those in the house cat (Fel dI).

Exonerate often failed to predict the short third exon of Abpa genes (~9 codons). In order to arrive at complete transcripts, we re-predicted all transcripts with Genewise [51] using separate hidden Markov models of the first two exons and of the third exon. If the first two exons were successfully predicted, a search for the third exon was initiated in the 5 kb downstream segment. On success, the two predictions were combined into a single transcript. The hidden Markov models were constructed using HMMer [52] from the coding sequences of the manually curated multiple sequence alignment of the mouse and rat Abp genomic DNA alignments (including novel predictions from the mm8 mouse genome assembly). This step also served as a filter for spurious predictions because those not yielding alignments using Genewise were discarded. Genewise exhibits a bias towards producing artefactual undisrupted coding sequences when faced with frameshifts or in-frame stop codons, which were likewise culled by manual curation. In order to decrease the possibility of missing paralogues in unassembled sequence data, we looked for additional copies with species-specific searches of the trace archive used MegaBLAST at the National Center for Biotechnology Information [53] and default parameters, as well as using evidence from known cDNA or EST sequences. This was also used to search for evidence of expression of paralogues with non-canonical splice sites.

Abp gene predictions in the target genome were classified as members of either the Abpa or Abpbg family using HMMer and HMMs derived from mouse and rat Abp coding sequences (see above). Amino acid sequences of members of the Abpa and Abpbg families were multiply aligned using MUSCLE [54]. Nucleotide alignments were derived from the amino acid sequence alignment. To clearly distinguish mouse genome Abp paralogues predicted here from those previously reported [8] and from those derived from other species/subspecies, we designate our current paralogues with the prefix B6, in reference to the C57BL/6J strain whose genome has been sequenced. Predictions with frameshifts, in-frame stop codons, or non-canonical splice sites were labeled as pseudogenes.

Gene finding in closely-related murid rodents

Genomic DNA was obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME) for ZALENDE/EiJ, (M. m. domesticus), CZECH/II (M. m. musculus), CAST/EiJ (M. m. castaneus), M. caroli, SPRET/EiJ (M. spretus), and M. pahari. Genomic R. norvegicus DNA was obtained from Bioline (Randolph, MA). Apodemus sylvaticus genomic DNA was obtained from the collections of the Department of Zoology, Charles University in Prague.

Our strategy for gene finding involved developing primers capable of amplifying Abpa gene sequences in one or more of a variety of rodent taxa. First, we amplified Abpa sequences from the genomic DNAs listed above using the primer sets we developed previously for published mouse and rat paralogues [14, 17]. Next, we performed multiple alignments of the sequences we obtained in the new taxa, and those identified in the mouse and rat genomes, to identify additional unique and conserved primer sites. Third, we made these new primer sets and tested them on the various taxa. In the process, we also mixed and matched forward and reverse primers from the old and new sets for additional combinations. Finally, we again aligned the sequences we obtained and repeated the process.

PCR was performed with a 62°C annealing temperature and 20 second stages for 25 cycles. Products were assayed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Unincorporated primers were removed using a QiaQuick PCR clean-up kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA.) and products were sequenced by MC Labs (San Francisco, CA).

We amplified and sequenced genomic DNA from nine of the fourteen paralogues reported by Emes et al [8] in five taxa from the subgenus Mus, M. pahari, and Apodemus. Sequences represented much of these genes' exons 2 and 3 and all of their intervening second intron. It should be noted that intron sequences have not been previously reported for Apodemus paralogues and thus the sequences we report here should not be confused with the cDNA sequences we used in an earlier study [8].

Evolutionary analyses

Abpa intron 2 sequences from Mus, Apodemus, Rattus, and rabbit were aligned using CLUSTALX [55, 56]. Phylogenetic trees were constructed from the alignments using the program PAUP* [57] and these were displayed in TreeView [58]. In PAUP*, neighbor-joining distance parameters with Jukes-Cantor correction and random-seeding were used to calculate divergences between rodent sequences and to create trees with proportional branch lengths. These were compared to 1000-replicated bootstrap distance trees to validate an essentially identical topology. The bootstrap values from the 1000-replicate tree are related to the NJ tree as indicated in the figure legend.

After manual reconciliation of gene and species trees, we estimated the ages of B6 in-paralogues by normalizing their divergences (in percent identity) to their divergence with their inferred M. pahari or M. caroli ortholog, and multiplying by the estimated divergence time of M. pahari or M. caroli lineages from M. m. domesticus [20]. For example, the divergence time between a26 and a27 was calulated as:
Divergence time  ( MYA ) = d ( a 26 a 27 ) × 7 ( MY ) 0.5 ( ( d ( a 26 p a h 1 ) + d ( a 27 p a h 1 ) ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaagaart1ev2aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xI8qiVKYPFjYdHaVhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9vqFj0dXdbba91qpepeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=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@7719@

where d(a26-a27) is the divergence between B6_a26 and B6_a27, d(a26-pah1) is the divergence between B6_a26 and M. pahari paralogue 1 and d(a27-pah1) is the divergence between B6_a27 and M. pahari paralogue 1 and 7 MY is the estimated divergence time between M. m. domesticus and M. pahari (Figure 1 and [20]).

KA and KS values, synonymous substitution rates and sites under positive selection were inferred using the codeml program of the PAML package [59] and the F3X4 codon model. The presence of sites under positive selection was established for either Abpa or Abpbg genes from all mammals we considered, using a log likelihood ratio test comparing paired models M7/M8 and M1/M2. Sites were predicted to be under positive selection if they showed a posterior probability (BEB) of P > 0.9 in one test and at least P > 0.5 in the other test. Polypeptide sequences were aligned with MUSCLE [54]. The alignment was manually checked for errors and then back-translated into nucleotide sequences, removing frame shifts and in-frame stop codons. Rate analyses were always performed on the same alignment; sequences not of interest for a particular analysis were simply excluded. Phylogenetic trees were estimated using the program KITSCH from the PHYLIP package [60].

Southern transfers

2.5 μg of genomic DNA was digested with 60 Units of EcoRI in a 100 μl reaction at 37°C for 16 hours. This enzyme was chosen because only one of the thirty Abpa paralogues in the mouse genome and none of the three rat paralogues exhibited an internal restriction site. Varying the EcoRI digestion over a period of 4–16 hr had no effect on the banding patterns we obtained, supporting complete and specific digestion; complete digestion was also confirmed by running 5% of the digestion on a test gel. The digestion was stopped by adding 14 μL of 1% SDS/100 mM EDTA and ethanol precipitated after the addition of 14 μl of 3 M NaAc, this was resuspended in 20 μl 3× loading buffer, and separated by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel in 0.5 × TBE for 2–6 hours. The gel was denatured for 30 minutes in 0.5 M NaCl/0.5 M NaOH. Transfer materials were pre-moistened in denaturation solution and transferred to Nytran nylon transfer membrane overnight in the same solution. Following transfer disassembly, the membrane was neutralized for 10 minutes in 3 M NaCl/0.5 M Tris pH 7.4 and the DNA fixed by baking at 60°C for 1 hour. The blot was pre-hybridized for 30 minutes at 60°C in 7% SDS/0.5 M PBS pH 7.4/1 mM EDTA; this solution was also used for hybridization.

Blots were probed with labeled ~200 bp PCR products amplified from M. m. domesticus (Zalende/EiJ) genomic DNA by PCR with primers spanning a splice junction between exon 2 and intron 2 in B6_a2 or B6_a27 or from M. pahari genomic DNA using similarly-located primers. B6_a2 and B6_a27 were selected because they are located close to the two extremities of the mouse ~3 Mb Abp genomic region (Figure 2). Probes were labeled by random-primed incorporation of α-32P-dATP into PCR products using a modification of the Amersham (Piscataway, NJ) Mega Prime random-primed system and protocol. For a 25 μl reaction, 10% of a 25 μl PCR reaction was used as template and was mixed with 1 μl of each of the original 10 μM forward and reverse PCR primers as well as 2.5 μl of the Mega Prime random primer mix. Unincorporated nucleotides were removed using a QiaQick PCR clean-up kit and the probe was boiled for 5 min in 5 ml of hybridization solution, followed by 2 min of incubation on ice, before being placed on the edge of the blot and incubated at 60°C overnight. Subsequently, the blot was washed with an increasingly stringent series of washes, using 5× to 0.1 × SSC and 0.1% SDS, which produced consistent bands with a decrease in background at higher stringency. Blots were exposed to Kodak x-ray film for 18 hours to 15 days between washes and were stripped for re-probing using two fifteen minute washes of boiling 0.1 × SSC/0.1% SDS. Gels were scanned with a Nikon scanner and prepared for publication using Adobe Photoshop v. 7.0.

Expression analysis of Abp paralogues

The BLAST algorithm of the NCBI genome browser was used to identify mouse ESTs, using the Abpa and Abpbg cDNAs reported here as search strings. An EST was assigned to a particular paralogue if it had 99+% coverage with 100% identity.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

AH and CPP thank Deanna Church (NCBI) and the mouse genome finishing team for ensuring completion of the Abp sequence region, Michele Clamp for helpful discussions of 2X genomes, and the UK Medical Research Council for financial support. The Holcomb Research Institute at Butler University provided support for the Southern blotting and PCR-based gene finding work. Katarina Seitz and her scholarship program at Butler University provided support for TDB's work at Oxford University. PM is supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport of the Czech Republic, MSMT 0021620828. RCK was supported by a Senior Postdoctoral Fellowship, grant number 5F33HD055016-02, from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NICHHD. CML thanks Janet Young, Barb Trask, and Ralf Luche for helpful comments on the manuscript and figures. She was supported by NIH Medical Genetics Postdoctoral Fellowship T32GM007454.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
(2)
MRC Functional Genetics Unit, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
(3)
Department of Biological Sciences, Butler University, Indianapolis, USA
(4)
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University in Prague, Praha, Czech Republic
(5)
MRC Functional Genetics Unit, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
(6)
Department of Biological Sciences, Butler University, Indianapolis, USA
(7)
Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA
(8)
Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, USA

References

  1. Goodstadt L, Ponting CP: Phylogenetic reconstruction of orthology, paralogy, and conserved synteny for dog and human. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006, 2 (9): e133-10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020133.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Waterston RH, Lindblad-Toh K, Birney E, Rogers J, Abril JF, Agarwal P, Agarwala R, Ainscough R, Alexandersson M, An P, Antonarakis SE, Attwood J, Baertsch R, Bailey J, Barlow K, Beck S, Berry E, Birren B, Bloom T, Bork P, Botcherby M, Bray N, Brent MR, Brown DG, Brown SD, Bult C, Burton J, Butler J, Campbell RD, Carninci P, Cawley S, Chiaromonte F, Chinwalla AT, Church DM, Clamp M, Clee C, Collins FS, Cook LL, Copley RR, Coulson A, Couronne O, Cuff J, Curwen V, Cutts T, Daly M, David R, Davies J, Delehaunty KD, Deri J, Dermitzakis ET, Dewey C, Dickens NJ, Diekhans M, Dodge S, Dubchak I, Dunn DM, Eddy SR, Elnitski L, Emes RD, Eswara P, Eyras E, Felsenfeld A, Fewell GA, Flicek P, Foley K, Frankel WN, Fulton LA, Fulton RS, Furey TS, Gage D, Gibbs RA, Glusman G, Gnerre S, Goldman N, Goodstadt L, Grafham D, Graves TA, Green ED, Gregory S, Guigo R, Guyer M, Hardison RC, Haussler D, Hayashizaki Y, Hillier LW, Hinrichs A, Hlavina W, Holzer T, Hsu F, Hua A, Hubbard T, Hunt A, Jackson I, Jaffe DB, Johnson LS, Jones M, Jones TA, Joy A, Kamal M, Karlsson EK, Karolchik D, Kasprzyk A, Kawai J, Keibler E, Kells C, Kent WJ, Kirby A, Kolbe DL, Korf I, Kucherlapati RS, Kulbokas EJ, Kulp D, Landers T, Leger JP, Leonard S, Letunic I, Levine R, Li J, Li M, Lloyd C, Lucas S, Ma B, Maglott DR, Mardis ER, Matthews L, Mauceli E, Mayer JH, McCarthy M, McCombie WR, McLaren S, McLay K, McPherson JD, Meldrim J, Meredith B, Mesirov JP, Miller W, Miner TL, Mongin E, Montgomery KT, Morgan M, Mott R, Mullikin JC, Muzny DM, Nash WE, Nelson JO, Nhan MN, Nicol R, Ning Z, Nusbaum C, O'Connor MJ, Okazaki Y, Oliver K, Overton-Larty E, Pachter L, Parra G, Pepin KH, Peterson J, Pevzner P, Plumb R, Pohl CS, Poliakov A, Ponce TC, Ponting CP, Potter S, Quail M, Reymond A, Roe BA, Roskin KM, Rubin EM, Rust AG, Santos R, Sapojnikov V, Schultz B, Schultz J, Schwartz MS, Schwartz S, Scott C, Seaman S, Searle S, Sharpe T, Sheridan A, Shownkeen R, Sims S, Singer JB, Slater G, Smit A, Smith DR, Spencer B, Stabenau A, Stange-Thomann N, Sugnet C, Suyama M, Tesler G, Thompson J, Torrents D, Trevaskis E, Tromp J, Ucla C, Ureta-Vidal A, Vinson JP, Von Niederhausern AC, Wade CM, Wall M, Weber RJ, Weiss RB, Wendl MC, West AP, Wetterstrand K, Wheeler R, Whelan S, Wierzbowski J, Willey D, Williams S, Wilson RK, Winter E, Worley KC, Wyman D, Yang S, Yang SP, Zdobnov EM, Zody MC, Lander ES: Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature. 2002, 420 (6915): 520-562. 10.1038/nature01262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Emes RD, Goodstadt L, Winter EE, Ponting CP: Comparison of the genomes of human and mouse lays the foundation of genome zoology. Hum Mol Genet. 2003, 12 (7): 701-709. 10.1093/hmg/ddg078.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Talley HM, Laukaitis CM, Karn RC: Female preference for male saliva: implications for sexual isolation of Mus musculus subspecies. Evolution. 2001, 55: 631-634. 10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0631:FPFMSI]2.0.CO;2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Laukaitis CM, Critser ES, Karn RC: Salivary androgen-binding protein (ABP) mediates sexual isolation in Mus musculus. Evolution. 1997, 51 (6): 2000-2005. 10.2307/2411020.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Dlouhy RD, Taylor BA, Karn RC: The genes for mouse salivary androgen-binding protein (ABP) subunits alpha and gamma are located on chromosome 7. Genetics. 1987, 115: 535-543.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Laukaitis CM, Dlouhy RD, Karn RC: The mouse salivary androgen-binding protein (ABP) gene cluster on Chromosome 7: Characterization and evolutionary relationships. Mammalian Genome. 2003, 14: 679-691. 10.1007/s00335-003-2291-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Emes RD, Riley MC, Laukaitis CM, Goodstadt L, Karn RC, Ponting CP: Comparative evolutionary genomics of androgen-binding protein genes. Genome Research. 2004, 14: 1516-1529. 10.1101/gr.2540304.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Karn RC, Laukaitis CM: Characterization of two forms of mouse salivary androgen-binding protein (ABP): Implications for evolutionary relationships and ligand-binding function. Biochemistry. 2003, 42 (23): 7162-7170. 10.1021/bi027424l.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Karn RC, Nachman MW: Reduced nucleotide variability at an androgen-binding protein locus (Abpa) in house mice: evidence for positive natural selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 1999, 16: 1192-1197.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Karn RC, Orth A, Bonhomme F, Boursot P: The complex history of a gene proposed to participate in a sexual isolation mechanism in house mice. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2002, 19 (4): 462-471.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Karn RC: The mouse salivary androgen-binding protein (ABP) alpha subunit closely resembles chain 1 of the cat allergen Fel dI. Biochemical Genetics. 1994, 32 (7/8): 271-277. 10.1007/BF00555830.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Klug J, Beier HM, Bernard A, Chilton BS, Fleming TP, Lehrer RI, Miele L, Pattabiraman N, Singh G: Uteroglobin/Clara cell 10-kDa family of proteins: nomenclature committee report. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2000, 923: 348-354.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Laukaitis CM, Karn RC: Evolution of the secretoglobins: A genomic and proteomic view. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society. 2005, 84: 493-501. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00450.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Reynolds SD, Reynolds PR, Pryhuber GS, Finder JD, Stripp BR: Secretoglobins SCGB3A1 and SCGB3A2 Define Secretory Cell Subsets in Mouse and Human Airways. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002, 166 (11): 1498-1509. 10.1164/rccm.200204-285OC.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaiser L, Gronlund H, Sandalova T, Ljunggren HG, van Hage-Hamsten M, Achour A, Schneider G: The crystal structure of the major cat allergen Fel d 1, a member of the secretoglobin family. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278 (39): 37730-37735. 10.1074/jbc.M304740200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Laukaitis CM, Dlouhy RD, Emes RD, Ponting CP, Karn RC: Diverse spatial, temporal, and sexual expression of recently duplicated androgen-binding protein genes in Mus musculus. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2005, 5 (40):Google Scholar
  18. Lynch M, Conery JS: The evolutionary fates and consequences of duplicate genes. Science. 2000, 290 (5494): 1151-1155. 10.1126/science.290.5494.1151.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Boursot P, Auffray JC, Britton-Davidion J, Bonhomme F: The evolution of house mice. Annu RevEcol Syst. 1993, 24: 119-152. 10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.001003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Chevret P, Veyrunes F, Britton-Davidian J: Molecular phylogeny of the genus Mus (Rodentia: Murinae) based on mmitochondrial and nuclear data. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society. 2005, 84: 417-427. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00444.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Green P: 2x genomes: Does depth matter?. Genome Res. 2007, 17 (11): 1547-1549. 10.1101/gr.7050807.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Margulies EH, Maduro VV, Thomas PJ, Tomkins JP, Amemiya CT, Luo M, Green ED: Comparative sequencing provides insights about the structure and conservation of marsupial and monotreme genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102 (9): 3354-3359. 10.1073/pnas.0408539102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dlouhy RD, Karn RC: The tissue source and cellular control of the apparent size of androgen binding protein (Abp), a mouse salivary protein whose electrophoretic mobility is under the control of Sex-limited saliva pattern (Ssp). Biochemical Genetics. 1983, 21: 1057-1070. 10.1007/BF00488459.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Dlouhy RD, Nichols WC, Karn RC: Production of an antibody to mouse salivary androgen binding protein (ABP) and its use in identifying a prostate protein produced by a gene distinct from Abp. Biochem Genet. 1986, 24: 743-673. 10.1007/BF00499007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hwang J, Hoffstetter JR, Bonhomme F, Karn RC: The microevolution of mouse salivary androgen-binding protein (ABP) paralleled subspeciation of Mus musculus. Journal of Heredity. 1997, 88: 93-97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ozyildirim AM, Wistow GJ, Gao J, Wang J, Dickinson DP, Frierson HF, Laurie GW: The lacrimal gland transcriptome is an unusually rich source of rare and poorly characterized gene transcripts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005, 46 (5): 1572-1580. 10.1167/iovs.04-1380.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. DV058835.Google Scholar
  28. CN843804.1, BY706510.Google Scholar
  29. AA794526.Google Scholar
  30. Adkins RM, Gelke EL, Rowe D, Honeycutt RL: Molecular phylogeny and divergence time estimates for major odent groups: Evidence from multiple genes. Mol Biol Evol. 2001, 18: 777-791.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Springer MS, Murphy WJ, Eizirik E, O'Brien SJ: Placental mammal diversification and the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100 (3): 1056-61. Epub 2003 Jan 27.. 10.1073/pnas.0334222100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Todokoro K, Kioussis D, Weissmann C: Two non-allelic human interferon alpha genes with identical coding regions. Embo J. 1984, 3 (8): 1809-1812.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Slightom JL, Chang LY, Koop BF, Goodman M: Chimpanzee fetal G gamma and A gamma globin gene nucleotide sequences provide further evidence of gene conversions in hominine evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 1985, 2 (5): 370-389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Bonhomme F, Guenet JL, Dod B, Moriwaki K, Bulfield G: The polyphyletic origin of laboratory inbred mice and their rate of evolution. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society. 1987, 30: 51-58. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1987.tb00288.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Wade CM, Kulbokas EJ, Kirby AW, Zody MC, Mullikin JC, Lander ES, Lindblad-Toh K, Daly MJ: The mosaic structure of variation in the laboratory mouse genome. Nature. 2002, 420 (6915): 574-578. 10.1038/nature01252.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Margulies EH, Vinson JP, Miller W, Jaffe DB, Lindblad-Toh K, Chang JL, Green ED, Lander ES, Mullikin JC, Clamp M: An initial strategy for the systematic identification of functional elements in the human genome by low-redundancy comparative sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102 (13): 4795-4800. 10.1073/pnas.0409882102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Griffith IJ, Craig S, Pollock J, Yu XB, Morgenstern JP, Rogers BL: Expression and genomic structure of the genes encoding FdI, the major allergen from the domestic cat. Gene. 1992, 113 (2): 263-268. 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90405-E.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Reininger R, Varga EM, Zach M, Balic N, Lindemeier AD, Swoboda I, Gronlund H, van Hage M, Rumpold H, Valenta R, Spitzauer S: Detection of an allergen in dog dander that cross-reacts with the major cat allergen, Fel d 1. Clin Exp Allergy. 2007, 37 (1): 116-124. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02611.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Morgenstern JP, Griffith IJ, Brauer AW, Rogers BL, Bond JF, Chapman MD, Kuo MC: Amino acid sequence of Fel dI, the major allergen of the domestic cat: protein sequence analysis and cDNA cloning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991, 88 (21): 9690-9694. 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9690.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Rivard G, Klemm W: Two body fluids containing bovine estrous pheromone(s). Chem Senses. 1989, 14: 273-279. 10.1093/chemse/14.2.273.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Brennan PA, Kendrick KM: Mammalian social odours: attraction and individual recognition. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2006, 361: 2061-2078. 10.1098/rstb.2006.1931.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Grus WE, Shi P, Zhang YP, Zhang J: Dramatic variation of the vomeronasal pheromone receptor gene repertoire among five orders of placental and marsupial mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102 (16): 5767-5772. 10.1073/pnas.0501589102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Grus WE, Zhang J: Rapid turnover and species-specificity of vomeronasal pheromone receptor genes in mice and rats. Gene. 2004, 340 (2): 303-312. 10.1016/j.gene.2004.07.037.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Young JM, Trask BJ: V2R gene families degenerated in primates, dog and cow, but expanded in opossum. Trends Genet. 2007, 23 (5): 212-215. 10.1016/j.tig.2007.03.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22 (22): 4673-4680. 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Eddy SR: Hidden Markov models. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1996, 6 (3): 361-365. 10.1016/S0959-440X(96)80056-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Human Genome Sequencing Center at Baylor College of Medicine. [http://www.hgsc.bcm.tmc.edu/projects/bovine/]
  48. Washington University Genome Sequencing Center. [http://genome.wustl.edu/genome.cgi?GENOME=Ornithorhynchus%20anatinus&SECTION=assemblies]
  49. Broad Institute Mammalian Genome Project. [http://www.broad.mit.edu/mammals/]
  50. Slater GS, Birney E: Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005, 6: 31-10.1186/1471-2105-6-31.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Birney E, Clamp M, Durbin R: GeneWise and Genomewise. Genome Res. 2004, 14 (5): 988-995. 10.1101/gr.1865504.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Eddy SR: Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics. 1998, 14 (9): 755-763. 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.755.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. NCBI/BLAST. [http://0-www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/blast/]
  54. Edgar RC: MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32 (5): 1792-1797. 10.1093/nar/gkh340.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Jeanmougin F, Thompson JD, Gouy M, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: Multiple sequence alignment with Clustal X. Trends in Biochemical Science. 1998, 23 (10): 403-405. 10.1016/S0968-0004(98)01285-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG: The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25 (24): 4876-4882. 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Swofford DL: PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). 1998, Sunderland, Massachusetts. , Sinauer Associates, Version 4:Google Scholar
  58. Page RDM: TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer applications in the Biosciences. 1996, 12: 357-358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Yang Z: PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput Appl Biosci. 1997, 13 (5): 555-556.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Felsenstein J: PHYLIP--Phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics. 1989, 5: 164-166.Google Scholar
  61. Schwartz S, Zhang Z, Frazer KA, Smit A, Riemer C, Bouck J, Gibbs R, Hardison R, Miller W: PipMaker--a web server for aligning two genomic DNA sequences. Genome Res. 2000, 10 (4): 577-586. 10.1101/gr.10.4.577.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Laukaitis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement
{"cc_re__cc_re__cc_by_2_0": ["tein (Abp) gene duplication occurred independently in diverse mammals\"/>\n\n    <meta name=\"dc.source\" content=\"BMC Evolutionary Biology 2008 8:1\"/>\n\n    <meta name=\"dc.format\" content=\"text/html\"/>\n\n    <meta name=\"dc.publisher\" content=\"BioMed Central\"/>\n\n    <meta name=\"dc.date\" content=\"2008-02-12\"/>\n\n    <meta name=\"dc.type\" content=\"OriginalPaper\"/>\n\n    <meta name=\"dc.language\" content=\"En\"/>\n\n    <meta name=\"dc.copyright\" content=\"2008 Laukaitis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.\"/>\n\n    <meta name=\"dc.rights\" content=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0\"/>\n\n    <meta name=\"dc.rightsAgent\" content=\"reprints@biomedcentral.com\"/>\n\n    <meta name=\"dc.description\" content=\"The draft mouse (Mus musculus) genome sequence revealed an unexpected proliferation of gene duplicates encoding a family of secretoglobin proteins including the androgen-binding protein (ABP) &#945;, &#946; and &#947; subunits. Further investigation of 14 &#945;-like (Abpa) and 13 &#946;- or &#947;-like (Abpbg) undisrupted gene sequences revealed a rich diversity of developmental st", "censeeBioMedCentralLtd\"><div xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\" class=\"ArticleCopyright\">\u00a9&nbsp;Laukaitis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.&nbsp;2008<div class=\"CopyrightComment\">\n                <p xmlns=\"\" class=\"SimplePara\">This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<span xmlns:func=\"http://oscar.fig.bmc.com\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\" class=\"ExternalRef\"><a href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"ext-link\"><span class=\"RefSource\">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</span></a></span>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</p>\n              </div></div></div></section></div>\n                        \n\n\n                    </article>\n                </main>\n\n                <div class=\"c-content-layout__side u-text-sm\">\n                    <aside>\n                        <div class=\"p-separator\">\n            "], "copyright__copyright__copyright": ["", "", "", "10 (4): 577-586. 10.1101/gr.10.4.577.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar\n\nCopyright\n\n\u00a9\u00a0Laukaitis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.\u00a02008\n\nThis article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.\n\nAdvertisement", "10 (4): 577-586. 10.1101/gr.10.4.577.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar\n\nCopyright\n\n\u00a9\u00a0Laukaitis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.\u00a02008\n\nThis article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.\n\nAdvertisement", "10 (4): 577-586. 10.1101/gr.10.4.577.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar\n\nCopyright\n\n\u00a9\u00a0Laukaitis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.\u00a02008\n\nThis article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.\n\nAdvertisement", "10 (4): 577-586. 10.1101/gr.10.4.577.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar\n\nCopyright\n\n\u00a9\u00a0Laukaitis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.\u00a02008\n\nThis article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.\n\nAdvertisement", "10 (4): 577-586. 10.1101/gr.10.4.577.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar\n\nCopyright\n\n\u00a9\u00a0Laukaitis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.\u00a02008\n\nThis article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.\n\nAdvertisement", "10 (4): 577-586. 10.1101/gr.10.4.577.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar\n\nCopyright\n\n\u00a9\u00a0Laukaitis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.\u00a02008\n\nThis article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.\n\nAdvertisement", "10 (4): 577-586. 10.1101/gr.10.4.577.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar\n\nCopyright\n\n\u00a9\u00a0Laukaitis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.\u00a02008\n\nThis article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.\n\nAdvertisement", "10 (4): 577-586. 10.1101/gr.10.4.577.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar\n\nCopyright\n\n\u00a9\u00a0Laukaitis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.\u00a02008\n\nThis article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.\n\nAdvertisement", "10 (4): 577-586. 10.1101/gr.10.4.577.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar\n\nCopyright\n\n\u00a9\u00a0Laukaitis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.\u00a02008\n\nThis article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.\n\nAdvertisement", "10 (4): 577-586. 10.1101/gr.10.4.577.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar\n\nCopyright\n\n\u00a9\u00a0Laukaitis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.\u00a02008\n\nThis article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.\n\nAdvertisement"]}