0

What determines the max CP and which methods are there to predict them? has been marked as possible dupe.

While I'd argue it is a different question the dupe suggestion also contains answers that would satisfy my question. But they are additional notes, which the OP wasn't technically asking for, while they are still related to the question.

But as all who play it know: niantic isn't that straight with presenting its game mechanics. So all the answerers are using as resource are their own impressions. Where comes the part I'm now not quiet sure about how to act. (If my case shoudl come out to be diferent from the former description please answer for the situation I'm describing and not the acutal case.)

I would like to get an answer that is evaluating the behavior or even better refering to a trustworthy resource. that is actually none of the answers doing. So they even could be wrong and one day a correct answer comes and isn't addressing the part I'm askign for, leaving my post as dupe of that one while it is only containing wrong answers about my OP.

So the question now is:

Should my OP anyway be marked as dupe and while that post is asking for topic A and Containing answers for topic A and B, should I add a bounty asking for adding resources on topic B? while thats not even what OP was itnerested in?

Or should in this case my post stay seprated as OP?

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .
{"cc_re__cc_re__cc_by_sa_3_0": ["-item\"><a href=\"https://twitter.com/stackoverflow\" class=\"-link js-gps-track\" data-gps-track=\"footer.click({ location: 2, link: 32 })\">Twitter</a></li>\r\n                    <li class=\"-item\"><a href=\"https://linkedin.com/company/stack-overflow\" class=\"-link js-gps-track\" data-gps-track=\"footer.click({ location: 2, link: 33 })\">LinkedIn</a></li>\r\n                </ul>\r\n\r\n                <p class=\"mt-auto mb24\">\r\nsite design / logo &#169; 2019 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under <a href=\"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/\" class=\"js-gps-track\" data-gps-track=\"footer.click({ location: 2, link: 34 })\" rel=\"license\">cc by-sa 3.0</a>\r\n                            with <a href=\"https://stackoverflow.blog/2009/06/25/attribution-required/\"  class=\"js-gps-track\" data-gps-track=\"footer.click({ location: 2, link:35 })\" rel=\"license\">attribution required</a>.\r\n                    <span id=\"svnrev\">rev&nbsp;2019.8.23.34694</span>\r\n                </p>\r\n            </div>\r\n        </div>\r\n\r\n            </footer>\r\n            <script>StackExchange.ready(function () { StackExchange.responsiveness.addSwitcher(); })</scri"], "copyright__copyright__copyright": ["he part I'm askign for, leaving my post as dupe of that one while it is only containing wrong answers about my OP.\n\nSo the question now is:\n\nShould my OP anyway be marked as dupe and while that post is asking for topic A and Containing answers for topic A and B, should I add a bounty asking for adding resources on topic B? while thats not even what OP was itnerested in?\n\nOr should in this case my post stay seprated as OP?\n\nYou must log in to answer this question.\n\nBrowse other questions tagged ."]}