Talk:Rebekah Brooks resigns from News International

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Pi zero in topic Update?

Review of revision 1259654 [Passed] edit

Live coverage? edit

How come a 'live coverage' link is cited as a source? --Brian McNeil / talk 16:07, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Update? edit

Shouldn't this article be updated (however that is done) since she has been arrested? Mattisse (talk) 20:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

A separate article should be used for a further development. In fact, the new development is so different that imho a separate article would be most appropriate even if this article wasn't past the 24-hour horizon. --Pi zero (talk) 20:42, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Return to "Rebekah Brooks resigns from News International" page.
{"cc_re__cc_re__cc_by_2_5": ["/ul>\n\t        <p>This page is not available in other languages.</p>\n\t    </section>\n\t</div>\t<div class=\"minerva-footer-logo\"><img src=\"/static/images/mobile/copyright/wikinews-wordmark-en.svg\" alt=\"Wikinews\" width=\"146\" height=\"21\"\n\tstyle=\"width: 9.125em; height: 1.3125em;\"/>\n\n</div>\n\t\t\t<ul id=\"footer-info\" class=\"footer-info hlist hlist-separated\">\n\t<li id=\"footer-info-lastmod\"> This page was last edited on 17 July 2011, at 20:42.</li>\n\t<li id=\"footer-info-copyright\">Content is available under <a class=\"external\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/\">CC BY 2.5</a> unless otherwise noted.</li>\n</ul>\n\n\t\t\t<ul id=\"footer-places\" class=\"footer-places hlist hlist-separated\">\n\t<li id=\"footer-places-privacy\"><a href=\"https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Policy:Privacy_policy\">Privacy policy</a></li>\n\t<li id=\"footer-places-about\"><a href=\"/wiki/Wikinews:About\">About Wikinews</a></li>\n\t<li id=\"footer-places-disclaimers\"><a href=\"/wiki/Wikinews:General_disclaimer\">Disclaimers</a></li>\n\t<li id=\"footer-places-wm-codeofconduct\"><a href"], "copyright__copyright__copyright": ["17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\n\nUpdate? edit\n\nShouldn't this article be updated (however that is done) since she has been arrested? Mattisse (talk) 20:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\n\nA separate article should be used for a further development. In fact, the new development is so different that imho a separate article would be most appropriate even if this article wasn't past the 24-hour horizon. --Pi zero (talk) 20:42, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\nReturn to \"Rebekah Brooks resigns from News International\" page.", "17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\n\nUpdate? edit\n\nShouldn't this article be updated (however that is done) since she has been arrested? Mattisse (talk) 20:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\n\nA separate article should be used for a further development. In fact, the new development is so different that imho a separate article would be most appropriate even if this article wasn't past the 24-hour horizon. --Pi zero (talk) 20:42, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\nReturn to \"Rebekah Brooks resigns from News International\" page.", "17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\n\nUpdate? edit\n\nShouldn't this article be updated (however that is done) since she has been arrested? Mattisse (talk) 20:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\n\nA separate article should be used for a further development. In fact, the new development is so different that imho a separate article would be most appropriate even if this article wasn't past the 24-hour horizon. --Pi zero (talk) 20:42, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\nReturn to \"Rebekah Brooks resigns from News International\" page.", "17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\n\nUpdate? edit\n\nShouldn't this article be updated (however that is done) since she has been arrested? Mattisse (talk) 20:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\n\nA separate article should be used for a further development. In fact, the new development is so different that imho a separate article would be most appropriate even if this article wasn't past the 24-hour horizon. --Pi zero (talk) 20:42, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\nReturn to \"Rebekah Brooks resigns from News International\" page.", "17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\n\nUpdate? edit\n\nShouldn't this article be updated (however that is done) since she has been arrested? Mattisse (talk) 20:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\n\nA separate article should be used for a further development. In fact, the new development is so different that imho a separate article would be most appropriate even if this article wasn't past the 24-hour horizon. --Pi zero (talk) 20:42, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\nReturn to \"Rebekah Brooks resigns from News International\" page.", "17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\n\nUpdate? edit\n\nShouldn't this article be updated (however that is done) since she has been arrested? Mattisse (talk) 20:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\n\nA separate article should be used for a further development. In fact, the new development is so different that imho a separate article would be most appropriate even if this article wasn't past the 24-hour horizon. --Pi zero (talk) 20:42, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\nReturn to \"Rebekah Brooks resigns from News International\" page.", "17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\n\nUpdate? edit\n\nShouldn't this article be updated (however that is done) since she has been arrested? Mattisse (talk) 20:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\n\nA separate article should be used for a further development. In fact, the new development is so different that imho a separate article would be most appropriate even if this article wasn't past the 24-hour horizon. --Pi zero (talk) 20:42, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\nReturn to \"Rebekah Brooks resigns from News International\" page.", "17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\n\nUpdate? edit\n\nShouldn't this article be updated (however that is done) since she has been arrested? Mattisse (talk) 20:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\n\nA separate article should be used for a further development. In fact, the new development is so different that imho a separate article would be most appropriate even if this article wasn't past the 24-hour horizon. --Pi zero (talk) 20:42, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\nReturn to \"Rebekah Brooks resigns from News International\" page.", "17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\n\nUpdate? edit\n\nShouldn't this article be updated (however that is done) since she has been arrested? Mattisse (talk) 20:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\n\nA separate article should be used for a further development. In fact, the new development is so different that imho a separate article would be most appropriate even if this article wasn't past the 24-hour horizon. --Pi zero (talk) 20:42, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply\nReturn to \"Rebekah Brooks resigns from News International\" page."]}