Skip to main content

Differences in peripheral neuropathy in xeroderma pigmentosum complementation groups A and D as evaluated by nerve conduction studies

Abstract

Background

Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) is a rare autosomal recessive genetic disorder with defective DNA nucleotide excision repair and associated with a high frequency of skin cancer. Approximately 25% of patients develop progressive neurological degeneration. Complementation groups XP-A and XP-D are most frequently associated with neurological disorders.

Design/methods

This is a retrospective review of patients with XP who were evaluated at NIH from 1986 to 2015 and had nerve conduction studies (NCS). In the complementation groups with peripheral neuropathy, further comparisons of the NCS were made with audiological, brain imaging, neuropsychological assessments that were also performed on most of the patients. Limited neuropathology of XP-A and XP-D patients were examined..

Results

The 33 patients had NCS: XP-A (9 patients), XP-C (7 patients), XP-D (10 patients), XP-E (1 patient), XP-V (4 patients), and XP-unknown (2 patients). Peripheral neuropathy based on nerve conduction studies was documented only in two complementation groups: 78% (7/9) of XP-A patients had a sensorimotor neuropathy while 50% (5/10) of XP-D patients had a sensory neuropathy only. Analysis of sural sensory nerve amplitude in both complementation groups XP-A and XP-D correlated with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), MRI/CT severity, and Full-scale Intelligence Quotient (IQ). Analysis of fibular motor nerve amplitude in complementation XP-A correlated with SNHL and MRI/CT severity. Limited follow-up studies showed gradual loss of NCS responses compared to an earlier and more rapid progression of the hearing loss.

Conclusions

Despite similar brain imaging and audiological findings patients, XP-A and XP-D complementation groups differ in the type of neuropathy, sensorimotor versus sensory alone. A few cases suggest that sensorineural hearing loss may precede abnormal NCS in XP and therefore serve as valuable clinical indicators of XP patients that will later develop peripheral neuropathy.

Peer Review reports

Background

Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder involving defective DNA nucleotide excision repair (NER) that is characterized by extreme sensitivity to the damaging effects of ultraviolet radiation (UV) resulting in a greater than 2000-fold increase in the frequency of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers. Furthermore, approximately 25% of XP patients develop a progressive neurodegeneration [1, 2]. XP is classified into 8 different complementation groups, denoted as XP A-G based on defects in DNA nucleotide excision repair (NER) genes and XP-Variant (XP-V) that has a defect in the polymerase eta gene [3]. Patients in complementation groups XP-A and XP-D have the highest frequency of neurological complications along with the greatest photosensitivity or burning on minimal sun exposure [4,5,6]. A four-decade longitudinal study on the natural history of XP since 1971 showed that the leading cause of death in XP patients was skin cancer. However, neurological degeneration was also a major cause of death [1]. Brain atrophy, cerebellar and basal ganglia degeneration leading to ataxia and severe cognitive decline have all been observed in XP-A and XP-D patients [7, 8]. In conjunction with central nervous system (CNS) deterioration, these patients have been observed to become areflexic and develop an axonal polyneuropathy as well as sensorineural hearing loss [9]. Though visual loss occurs in XP, it is usually the result of direct UV-exposure of the anterior components of the eye rather than specific optic nerve deterioration [10].

The frequency of peripheral neuropathy (PN) and its association with CNS degeneration, in different XP complementation groups remains unknown. In this study, we performed a retrospective review of nerve conduction studies of XP patients examined at NIH over a 30 year period to assess the frequency and type of peripheral neuropathy among patients in different XP complementation groups. In the complementation groups associated with peripheral neuropathy, we further determined the correlation between PN and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) as well as markers of CNS deterioration in XP including brain atrophy and loss of cognition.

Materials and methods

Patients

Patients were evaluated under clinical protocols, NCT00001813 and NCT00046189, approved by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Institutional Review Boards. Written, informed consent and assent, was obtained from all patients. The patients underwent multimodality assessment including clinical [11], genetic, MRI/CT imaging, neuropsychological, laboratory and electrodiagnostic evaluation. Records of deep tendon reflexes were available on most of the subjects evaluated. Absence of deep tendon reflexes were considered to be a clinical manifestation of peripheral neuropathy. Available data was retrieved by retrospective review of charts of patients with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of XP at the NIH from 1986 to 2018. Subjects were excluded from the study if no or incomplete nerve conduction studies were performed, if they had a complex diagnosis of XP combined with another disease including XP-trichodystrophy or XP-Cockayne syndrome, or had other comorbidities such as chemotherapy or diabetes. The neurologist, audiologist, neuropsychologist, and neuropathologist who performed the assessments were not blinded to the diagnoses. For clarity in this paper, complementation group A subjects were designated XPA1–9 and complementation group D were designated XPD 1–10 but have also included the prior protocol designated subject numbers in the tables. The following subjects have been previously reported in other articles, XPA3 (XP19BE) [5], XPA5 (XP12BE) [4, 5, 9, 12], XPA6 (XP360BE) [13], XPD1 (XP29BE) [5, 14, 15], and XPD4 (XP33BE) [5].

Clinical neurophysiology studies

Nerve conduction studies were performed using standard methodology on a Nicolet Viking Select equipment (Natus, Middleton, WI) for the studies performed after 2004 and were compared to department-based normative values. All prior studies used earlier versions of the Nicolet Viking equipment. In most patients, the median and sural sensory nerves and the median and fibular motor nerves were tested although other nerves were selected for clinical indications. No needle Electromyography (EMG) studies were performed. For consistency, the studies were reviewed by one neurologist (TJL). For this EMG lab, the normal nerve conduction study amplitudes are: sural sensory nerve ≥6 μV, median sensory nerve ≥15 μV, fibular motor nerve ≥2.5 mV, and median motor nerve ≥4.5 mV. Though some patients were severely affected by skin manifestations of xeroderma pigmentosum, we did not encounter technical difficulties in obtaining nerve conduction studies.

The presence of a sensory polyneuropathy is defined as diminished or absent sensory nerve amplitudes and minimal to no changes in conduction velocity with preserved motor nerve conduction studies [16]. The presence of a sensorimotor polyneuropathy is defined as a combination of diminished or absent amplitudes in both motor and sensory nerves with minimal to no changes in conduction velocity [16]. In length-dependent neuropathies, the sural sensory nerve and fibular motor nerve studies are predominantly affected.

Audiological evaluations

Audiologic testing included pure-tone air-conduction (0.25–8 kHz) and bone-conduction (0.25–4 kHz) thresholds and speech audiometry using clinical audiometers in double-walled sound suites that met American National Standards Institute criteria. Audiology results were presented as the four frequency (0.5/1/2/4-kHz)-pure-tone average (4F-PTA), using the right ear results only. Classification of the hearing loss is: < 20 dB hearing level (dBHL) = normal hearing, > 20–40 dBHL = mild hearing loss, > 40–70 dBHL = moderate hearing loss, > 70–95 = severe hearing loss, > 95 profound hearing loss. For consistency, the studies were reviewed by one audiologist (CCB).

Brain imaging

MRI or CT imaging of brain was performed at NIH or reviewed from outside sources. Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy were classified on a four-point scale: normal (0), mild (1), moderate (2), or severe (3) depending on the extent of volume loss at each patient’s age. For consistency, the studies were reviewed and graded by one neuroradiologist (NP).

Neuropsychological studies

Wechsler scales appropriate for age were performed to yield a Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (IQ). Those XP patients unable to do the Wechsler test because of limited cognitive ability or very young age, were excluded. For the Full-Scale IQ, a score of less than 80 was considered to be abnormal. For consistency, the studies were reviewed by one neuropsychologist (EW).

Neuropathology

Pathology slides from autopsy were available for one XP-A patient (XPA5) and one XP-D patient (not evaluated by NCS) for review. These autopsy reports had been previously published [4], and available specimens of muscle and nerve were reexamined. New hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) stained sections of peripheral nerve and muscle were prepared from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded material. For consistency, the studies were reviewed by one neuropathologist (MQ).

Data analysis

Descriptive statistics of demographic data were presented in table and two-sample t-test was used to evaluate the difference in age between XP-A and XP-D group For each of neurophysiological measures of motor and sensory amplitudes, two-sample t-test was used to evaluate the difference between XP-A and XP-D group, and Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate the association with hearing level. The correlation analysis was performed for XP-A and XP-D combined or separately depending on the test of homogeneity of regression slopes (or interaction between XP group and hearing level) by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The correlation analysis would be performed separately if the interaction was significant (p < 0.05), because the significant interaction indicated that the linear relationship between the neurophysiological measures clinical outcome and hearing level in XP-A group was different from that in XP-D. Normality assumption for two-sample t-test and ANCOVA was examined using Shapiro-Wilk test.

Data availability policy

Anonymized data will be shared by request from any qualified investigator.

Results

Demographics

For the study, 106 patients had been evaluated for XP phenotype/genotype over 30 years (Fig. 1) with electrodiagnostic studies performed on 54 of the patients. The majority of the electrodiagnostic studies were performed between 2004 and 2015, though 7 patients had studies performed between 1986 and 1993. Twenty-one patients were excluded from final analysis: 12 patients with XP-TTD complex [1] and 9 patients were excluded because of confounding comorbidities or incomplete studies, including 6 XP-C patients, 1 XP-D patient, 1 XP-E patient and 1 XP-G patient. In the XP-D complementation group, the one excluded patient had limb girdle muscular dystrophy. Of the remaining 33 patients (Table 1), 9 (27%) patients were in complementation group XP-A, 7 (21%) patients were in XP-C, 10 (30%) patients were in XP-D, 1 (3%) was in XP-E, 4 (12%) were in XP-V, and 2 (6%) had an unknown mutation causing XP (Table 1). The total group demographics were 14 males and 19 females with a mean age at initial NCS study was 20.7 ± 13.6 years (range 3–54 years).

The XP-A and XP-D complementation groups were the only groups that had evidence for both peripheral neuropathy and other neurological disorders of hearing loss, brain imaging abnormalities, and abnormal IQ (Table 1). Therefore, we limited the remainder of the analysis to these two groups including the correlation analysis, long-term follow-up studies and pathology. These two complementation groups were slightly younger than the total group of patients in Table 1, but there was no significant difference in age (p = 0.48) between the two groups (mean ± standard deviation, range; XP-A -18.5 ± 2.1, 3–24, XP-D - 16.7 ± 9.0, 5–43). Follow-up studies were available for six XP-A and XP-D patients and limited available neuropathology was reviewed.

XP-A findings

Seven of the nine (78%) XP-A patients had evidence for an axonal sensorimotor polyneuropathy based on nerve conduction studies with the findings summarized in Tables 1, and 2. For the seven XP-A patients with abnormal nerve conduction studies, the median sensory nerve had an amplitude of 4.62 ± 4.38 μV with conduction velocity 47 ± 6 m/s; the sural sensory nerve had an amplitude of 0.86 ± 1.46 μV with conduction velocity 47 ± 6 m/s, the median motor nerve had an amplitude 9.35 ± 1.62 mV with a conduction velocity 46 ± 3 m/s, and the fibular motor nerve had an amplitude of 1 ± 1 mV amplitude with a conduction velocity of 33 ± 6 m/s.. For the two XP-A patients with normal nerve conduction studies, the median sensory nerve had amplitudes of 37 μV and 33 μV with conduction velocities of 58 and 56 m/s, the sural sensory nerve had both amplitudes of 10 μV with a conduction velocity of 52 m/s and 43 m/s, the median motor nerve had amplitudes of 10.4 and 5.6 mV with conduction velocities of 57 m/s and 62 m/s, and the fibular motor nerve had amplitudes of 4.7 mV and 5.7 mV with both conduction velocities of 49 m/s. The 4F-PTA showed that six of these patients (XPA1–6) also had mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss and MRI/CT imaging abnormalities. One subject (XPA-7) with neuropathy, a 3 year old, did not have audiology testing. MRI/CT imaging findings observed in the same subjects with neuropathy included cerebral atrophy, cerebellar atrophy and in 2 pediatric patients, hypomyelination was noted. Six XP-A patients had Full-Scale IQ testing and all were abnormal, regardless of the presence or absence of neuropathy. XP-A patients who had neuropathy, expectedly, also had absent DTRs. However, one XP-A patient (XPA-9) eventually lost her DTRs though her NCS remained normal. Information on other facets of the neurological exam were limited by the cognitive status of the patients.

XP-D findings

In the XP-D patients, 5 patients of 10 studied (XPD1–5) or 50% had evidence for an axonal sensory neuropathy based on nerve conduction studies with the findings summarized in Tables 1, and 3. For the 5 XP-D patients with abnormal nerve conduction studies, the median sensory nerve had an amplitude 5.20 ± 2.68 μV with a conduction velocity 49 ± 5 m/s, the sural sensory nerve had an amplitude of 1.75 ± 1.70 μV with a conduction velocity 46 ± 4 m/s, the median motor nerve had an amplitude 9.64 ± 4.54 mV with a conduction velocity 55 ± 3 m/s, and the fibular motor nerve had an amplitude of 3.62 ± 1.15 mV with a conduction velocity of 42 ± 2 m/s.. For the 5 XP-D patients with normal nerve conduction studies, the median sensory nerve had an amplitude 32.6 ± 8.26 μV with a conduction velocity 54 ± 5 m/s, the sural sensory nerve had an amplitude of 13.2 ± 6.53 μV with a conduction velocity 48 ± 5 m/s, the median motor nerve had an amplitude 11.32 ± 1.14 mV with a conduction velocity 57 ± 5 m/s, the fibular motor nerve had an amplitude of 5.4 ± 1.54 mV with a conduction velocity of 48 ± 4 m/s. These patients (XPD1–5) also had mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss and abnormal MRI/CT images of the brain. The MRI/CT findings included varying degrees of cerebral and/or cerebellar atrophy. XP-D patients without neuropathy had normal hearing and brain imaging, though one patient (XPD6) showed development of cerebral atrophy between ages 9 and 14. Low Full-Scale IQs were observed in all patients with neuropathy and in two patients without neuropathy. All XP-D patients with peripheral neuropathy had absent DTRs while only one patient without peripheral neuropathy (XPD6) had absent DTRs. This was the same patient noted to be developing recent signs of brain atrophy in brain imaging. Clinical exams of the 5 patients with neuropathy noted decreased distal sensation without weakness.

Comparison of XP-A and XP-D complementation groups

Comparison of the nerve conduction studies between the XP-A and XP-D complementation groups, using a two-sample t-test, showed a significant difference in the fibular motor amplitudes (p = 0.0208, for XP-A: mean = 2.15, SD = 2.01, median = 1.85, 95%CI = 0.47–3.83; for XP-D: mean = 4.47, SD = 1.82, median = 3.8, 95%CI = 3.16–5.78; effect size or Cohen’s d = 1.22) but not the sural sensory, median sensory and median motor amplitudes. There was no significant difference in the hearing loss, cortical atrophy on MRI/CT imaging and Full-scale IQ between the two complementation groups.

Association evaluations (XP-A and XP-D)

For sural sensory amplitude, the Pearson correlation analysis using a combined XP-A and XP-D group found significant linear correlation with hearing loss (r = − 0.845, R2 = 0.714, p < 0.001, Fig. 2a), MRI/CT severity (r = − 0.796, R2 = 0.634, p < 0.001), and Full-Scale IQ (r = 0.520, R2 = 0.27, p = 0.047) reflecting deterioration reflecting deterioration of sensory amplitudes with hearing loss, MRI/CT severity and Full-scale IQ.

For median sensory amplitude, significant linear correlation was also found with hearing loss (r = 0.842, R2 = 0.709, p < 0.001, Fig. 2b) and MRI/CT severity (r = 0.865, R2 = 0.748, p < 0.001) but not with IQ (p = 0.258).

For fibular motor amplitude (Fig. 2c), the linear correlation with hearing was significant (r = − 0.828, R2 = 0.686, p = 0.022) in XP-A group, but not in XP-D group (p = 0.985). This was in keeping with the sparing of motor nerve abnormalities in XP-D group. The linear correlation with MRI/CT severity was significant (r = − 0.761, R2 = 0.58, p = 0.0285) in XP-A group, which was similar to the sural sensory amplitude, but not significant (p = 0.632) in XP-D group. The correlation with Full-scale IQ was not significant in either XP-A (p = 0.627) or XP-D (p = 0.689).

For median motor amplitude (Fig. 2d), correlation coefficients were not significant for hearing, MRI/CT severity, or Full-Scale IQ.

For these analyses, the correlation coefficients of the amplitude variable with each of the clinical variables were estimated based on combined or separate XP-A and XP-D groups depending on the significance of the interaction between XP group and clinical variables, and the significance of the differences of variables between XP-A and XP-D groups. All amplitude variables except for fibular motor amplitude variable, the correlation analyses were performed by combining XP-A and XP-D groups, since the interaction between XP group (XP-A vs. XP-D) and each of the three clinical variables, hearing loss, MRI/CT severity and IQ, was not significant (p > = 0.230) in ANCOVA and the differences between XP-A and XP-D group in any of the three sensory amplitude variables and three clinical variables were not significant in t-test. For fibular motor amplitude variable, the correlation analysis was performed for XP-A and XP-D group separately, since the interaction between XP group and hearing loss was significant (p = 0.050, Fig. 2c), and the difference in fibular motor amplitude between XP-A and XP-D groups was significant (p = 0.0208).

Follow-up evaluations

Follow-up evaluations were available on two XP-A and four XP-D patients. Patient XPA3 (XP19BE) was evaluated at age 14, 35, and 37 years and had neurologic deterioration during this time (Fig. 3a). Sural sensory nerve amplitude decreased from 10.8 μV to 3 μV over the first 19 years but did not change any further when retested 2 years later. The initial study was performed on an older EMG machine which may have affected the results. Sequential nerve conduction studies of lower extremity motor nerves were not available. Patient XPA8 (XP337BE) did not have overt signs of neurologic deterioration and motor and sensory NCS at age 14 and 23 years have remained stable.

In the XP-D complementation group, the two patients, XPD1 (XP29BE) and XPD4 (XP33BE) with peripheral neuropathy (XPD-1 and XPD-4) and neurological deterioration showed a minimal decline in the sensory responses with stable motor responses (Fig. 3b). Patient XPD6 (XP116BE), an initially neurologically normal patient with recent signs of cerebral atrophy on CT brain images, had a 50% decrease in sural sensory response (25 μV to 12 μV) over 4 years. Patient XPD9 (XP341BE), also neurologically normal, showed no change in the median and sural sensory nerve amplitudes in a three-year follow-up period. There were no decreases in the motor responses for any of the XPD patients.

Neuropathology

Nerve and muscle pathology was compared between the XP-A and XP-D patient (Fig. 3) and previously reported [4]. XPA5 (XP12BE) patient died at age 44, was cachectic (< 3%tile wt.), nonambulatory, with no detectable DTRs, and had hearing loss and optic atrophy [5]. The XP-D patient (XP18BE) died at age 45 and was not cachectic (50% tile wt.) but was nonambulatory, with no detectible DTRs, and had hearing loss [5]. There were no available nerve conduction studies for this XP-D patient. Both patients had had adequate nutrition maintained through g-tubes.

Sampling from psoas muscle and median and vagus nerve were formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded and slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for routine light microscopy evaluation. For electron microscopy studies, samples were fixed in glutaraldehyde. Limited immunohistochemical stains for myofibers.

were performed on the XP-A patient. Other preparation including enzyme histochemistry and teased fibers for muscle and nerve evaluation were not available.

In the XP-A patient, electron microscopy of the vagus nerve showed axonal degeneration and degenerative changes of the myelin sheath consistent with an axonal neuropathy (not shown) though median nerve only showed mild loss of large myelinated axons (Fig. 4A). The psoas muscle (Fig. 4B) showed findings characteristic of chronic denervation atrophy with many angular atrophic fibers, myofiber type-grouping, pyknotic nuclear clumps and fat infiltration. There was no evidence of myopathic type changes, inflammation or vasculitis. Slow and fast myosin antibody stains showed nonselective atrophy with evidence of myofiber-type grouping.

In the XP-D patient, the nonspecified nerve from the arm under light microscopy had normal architecture (Fig. 4C) as well as normal pathology of a dorsal root ganglion (not shown). There were mild neurogenic findings on psoas muscle pathology (Fig. 4D).

Discussion

Consistent with observations in past studies, patients with mutations in XP-A and XP-D develop neurological complications including peripheral neuropathy, brain atrophy, hearing loss, and low IQ. These neurological findings are generally not found in patients with mutations in XP-C, XP-E or XP-V. Though there were a limited number of patients in each group, our electrodiagnostic findings suggests that the peripheral nerve manifestations differ between these two complementation groups, with the XP-A patients having a sensorimotor neuropathy and XP-D patients having only a sensory neuropathy. Sensorimotor neuropathy has been reported in XP-A patients [17, 18] as well as the associated loss of deep tendon reflexes [19] though selectivity of XP-D neuropathies to the sensory nerve has not been previously described. In both XP-A and XP-D complementation groups, the peripheral neuropathy becomes evident within the first or second decade and appears to progress slowly as shown by the gradual decline in sural sensory responses in the follow-up studies.

We also demonstrated that there were correlations between the sural sensory amplitude and the other three markers of neurodegeneration: hearing loss, cortical atrophy on brain imaging and low IQ. This suggests that the neurodegeneration is affecting the different parts of the nervous system may be occurring concurrently. The correlations for the fibular motor amplitude were more limited, reflecting the differences between the XP-A and XP-D neuropathy presentations. The relative sparing of the median motor nerve in XP-A suggests that there is likely a length-dependent motor nerve degeneration. The neuropathology of the PNS of the XP-A patient shows an axonal neuropathy associated with chronic neurogenic denervation of the muscles consistent with the sensorimotor neuropathy noted on electrodiagnostic studies. This finding was not observed in the neuropathology of the XPD patient.

In XP, perturbations in the NER pathway result in helix-distorting lesions in the DNA which leads to various end organ damage [20,21,22,23,24]. Neuronal and glial cell injury, both in mature nonreplicating cells and immature replicating cells, are subject to oxidative stress which is normally repaired by a host of DNA repair mechanisms [25]. The XPC and XPE proteins are responsible for damage recognition, the XPA protein is involved in the verification and complex formation at the site of DNA damage. The XPD protein is one of the helicases involved in unwinding the DNA prior to excision and repair. The other XP gene products are involved in DNA complex stabilization, DNA cleavage, and finally repair of the DNA strand with polymerases and ligases. Clearly, the integrity of the NER pathway and the XP gene complementation groups is crucial for maintenance of DNA repair in the central and peripheral nervous systems though the exact mechanism is not known. Since neuronal cells are not predisposed directly to the injurious effects of ultraviolet (UV) radiation, other mechanisms for neuronal injury in XP patients have been proposed [26]. One suggested mechanism may be generation of oxidative stress [27]. The reactive oxygen species (ROS) are constantly generated during aerobic metabolism. One of the ROS is hydroxyl radical, the key endogenous source of DNA damage. Hydroxyl radicals induce many different base lesions including cyclopurine deoxynucleosides (CyPU) that are known to be removed by the NER pathway [28,29,30,31]. Accumulation of cyPU in neuronal cells with inability to undergo DNA repair may lead to neurodegeneration [32]. Other suggested mechanisms may be mitochondrial dysfunction and role of these proteins in non-DNA repair pathways [26, 33]. Generation of neural stem cells and post-mitotic neurons from XP-A patient induced pluripotent stem cells (IPSCs) showed hypersensitivity to DNA damage-induced apoptosis following UV exposure [34]. The neurophysiological findings in this paper suggests that there may be slightly different mechanisms of neurodegeneration associated with XP-A and XP-D complementation groups that, at least in the peripheral nervous system, result in two types of neuropathy. Better understanding of pathways may be beneficial in designing clinical studies that address neurotoxicities in XP-A and XP-D since controlled clinical studies in this area have been limited to date [35, 36]. There is no known prevention or treatment of the neurological sequelae of XP though antioxidant therapy, upregulation of autophagy, sulfonylureas, and nicotinamide have been considered possible avenues of treatment [35, 37].

Because XP is a rare disease, the number of subjects in each complementation group is small and the robustness of our findings is limited. However, it supports the importance of DNA NER in the survival of central and peripheral neurons with defects in the pathway resulting in variable forms of peripheral nerve degeneration. Continued studies on the peripheral nerve manifestations of XP-A and XP-D may help to further elucidate the role of the XP gene defects in the pathogenesis of neuropathy, particularly as related to the DNA NER pathway. Also, it would be important to expand the evaluation of peripheral nervous system deterioration by including investigation of small fiber neuropathies in the XP complementation groups and to determine if there is electrophysiological evidence of anterior horn motor neuron deterioration, particularly in the XP-A patients.

Conclusions

The findings in this study are notable for the distinction between XP-A and XP-D on the basis of the type of peripheral neuropathy. CNS deterioration and hearing loss does not appear to be different between the two XP complementation groups. In clinical evaluation of XP-A and XP-D patients, it is important to include evaluation of peripheral neuropathy as part of the complete neurological evaluation that also includes hearing testing, brain imaging, and cognitive testing.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

4F-PTA:

Four frequency (0.5/1/2/4-kHz) pure-tone average

CNS:

Central nervous system

CT:

Computed tomography

dB HL:

Decibel hearing level

DTR:

Deep tendon reflexes

EMG:

Electromyography

H & E:

Hematoxylin and eosin

IQ:

Intellectual quotient

kHz:

Kilohertz

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

μV:

Microvolt

mV:

Millivolt

NER:

Nucleotide excision repair

NIH:

National Institutes of Health

NCS:

Nerve conduction studies

PN:

Peripheral neuropathy

SNHL:

Sensorineural hearing loss

TTD:

Trichothiodystrophy

UV:

Ultraviolet radiation

XP:

Xeroderma pigmentosum

References

  1. 1.

    DiGiovanna JJ, Kraemer KH. Shining a light on xeroderma pigmentosum. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132:785–96.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bukowska B, Karwowski BT. Actual state of knowledge in the field of diseases related with defective nucleotide excision repair. Life Sci. 2018;195:6–18.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lindenbaum Y, Dickson D, Rosenbaum P, Kraemer K, Robbins I, Rapin I. Xeroderma pigmentosum/cockayne syndrome complex: first neuropathological study and review of eight other cases. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2001;5:225–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lai JP, Liu YC, Alimchandani M, et al. The influence of DNA repair on neurological degeneration, cachexia, skin cancer and internal neoplasms: autopsy report of four xeroderma pigmentosum patients (XP-A, XP-C and XP-D). Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2013;1:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Totonchy MB, Tamura D, Pantell MS, et al. Auditory analysis of xeroderma pigmentosum 1971-2012: hearing function, sun sensitivity and DNA repair predict neurological degeneration. Brain. 2013;136:194–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Anttinen A, Koulu L, Nikoskelainen E, et al. Neurological symptoms and natural course of xeroderma pigmentosum. Brain. 2008;131:1979–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ueda T, Kanda F, Nishiyama M, Nishigori C, Toda T. Quantitative analysis of brain atrophy in patients with xeroderma pigmentosum group a carrying the founder mutation in Japan. J Neurol Sci. 2017;381:103–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ueda T, Kanda F, Aoyama N, Fujii M, Nishigori C, Toda T. Neuroimaging features of xeroderma pigmentosum group a. Brain Behav. 2012;2:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Viana LM, Seyyedi M, Brewer CC, et al. Histopathology of the inner ear in patients with xeroderma pigmentosum and neurologic degeneration. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34:1230–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Brooks BP, Thompson AH, Bishop RJ, et al. Ocular manifestations of xeroderma pigmentosum: long-term follow-up highlights the role of DNA repair in protection from sun damage. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:1324–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Nakano E, Takeuchi S, Ono R, Tsujimoto M, Masaki T, Nishigori C. Xeroderma Pigmentosum diagnosis using a flow Cytometry-based nucleotide excision repair assay. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138:467–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ramkumar HL, Brooks BP, Cao X, et al. Ophthalmic manifestations and histopathology of xeroderma pigmentosum: two clinicopathological cases and a review of the literature. Surv Ophthalmol. 2011;56:348–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Christen-Zaech S, Imoto K, Khan SG, et al. Unexpected occurrence of xeroderma pigmentosum in an uncle and nephew. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:1285–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ueda T, Compe E, Catez P, Kraemer KH, Egly JM. Both XPD alleles contribute to the phenotype of compound heterozygote xeroderma pigmentosum patients. J Exp Med. 2009;206:3031–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zhou X, Khan SG, Tamura D, et al. Abnormal XPD-induced nuclear receptor transactivation in DNA repair disorders: trichothiodystrophy and xeroderma pigmentosum. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21:831–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Donofrio PD, Albers JW. AAEM minimonograph #34: polyneuropathy: classification by nerve conduction studies and electromyography. Muscle Nerve. 1990;13:889–903.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Tsuji Y, Ueda T, Sekiguchi K, et al. Progressive length-dependent polyneuropathy in xeroderma pigmentosum group a. Muscle Nerve. 2020;62:534–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kanda T, Oda M, Yonezawa M, et al. Peripheral neuropathy in xeroderma pigmentosum. Brain. 1990;113(Pt 4):1025–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Tachi N, Sasaki K, Kusano T, et al. Peripheral neuropathy in four cases of group a xeroderma pigmentosum. J Child Neurol. 1988;3:114–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    McKinnon PJ. Maintaining genome stability in the nervous system. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:1523–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Cleaver JE, States JC. The DNA damage-recognition problem in human and other eukaryotic cells: the XPA damage binding protein. Biochem J. 1997;328(Pt 1):1–12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Liu H, Rudolf J, Johnson KA, et al. Structure of the DNA repair helicase XPD. Cell. 2008;133:801–12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kajitani GS, Nascimento LLS, Neves MRC, Leandro GDS, Garcia CCM, Menck CFM. Transcription blockage by DNA damage in nucleotide excision repair-related neurological dysfunctions. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2021;114:20–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kobaisi F, Fayyad N, Rezvani HR, et al. Signaling pathways, chemical and biological modulators of nucleotide excision repair: the faithful shield against uv genotoxicity. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:4654206.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Feltes BC, Bonatto D. Overview of xeroderma pigmentosum proteins architecture, mutations and post-translational modifications. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2015;763:306–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Rizza ERH, DiGiovanna JJ, Khan SG, Tamura D, Jeskey JD, Kraemer KH. Xeroderma Pigmentosum: a model for human premature aging. J Invest Dermatol. 2021 Apr;141(4S):976-984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2020.11.012. Epub 2021 Jan 9.PMID: 33436302

  27. 27.

    de Sousa Leal AM, de Azevedo Medeiros LB, Munoz-Cadavid CO, et al. XPA deficiency affects the ubiquitin-proteasome system function. DNA Repair (Amst). 2020;94:102937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kamakura N, Yamamoto J, Brooks PJ, Iwai S, Kuraoka I. Effects of 5′,8-cyclodeoxyadenosine triphosphates on DNA synthesis. Chem Res Toxicol. 2012;25:2718–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Brooks PJ. The 8,5′-cyclopurine-2′-deoxynucleosides: candidate neurodegenerative DNA lesions in xeroderma pigmentosum, and unique probes of transcription and nucleotide excision repair. DNA Repair (Amst). 2008;7:1168–79.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Brooks PJ, Wise DS, Berry DA, et al. The oxidative DNA lesion 8,5′-(S)-cyclo-2′-deoxyadenosine is repaired by the nucleotide excision repair pathway and blocks gene expression in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:22355–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kuraoka I, Bender C, Romieu A, Cadet J, Wood RD, Lindahl T. Removal of oxygen free-radical-induced 5′,8-purine cyclodeoxynucleosides from DNA by the nucleotide excision-repair pathway in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:3832–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Brooks PJ. The cyclopurine deoxynucleosides: DNA repair, biological effects, mechanistic insights, and unanswered questions. Free Radic Biol Med. 2017;107:90–100.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Prates Mori M, de Souza-Pinto NC. Role of mitochondrial dysfunction in the pathophysiology of DNA repair disorders. Cell Biol Int. 2018;42:643–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Fu L, Xu X, Ren R, et al. Modeling xeroderma pigmentosum associated neurological pathologies with patients-derived iPSCs. Protein Cell. 2016;7:210–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Abeti R, Zeitlberger A, Peelo C, et al. Xeroderma pigmentosum: overview of pharmacology and novel therapeutic strategies for neurological symptoms. Br J Pharmacol. 2019;176:4293–301.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Evangelisti C, Cenni V, Lattanzi G. Potential therapeutic effects of the MTOR inhibitors for preventing ageing and progeria-related disorders. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;82:1229–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Weon JL, Glass DA 2nd. Novel therapeutic approaches to xeroderma pigmentosum. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181:249–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the patients and their families for their commitment and time to this study.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health Intramural Research Programs of National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) and National Cancer Institute (NCI). The funding bodies financially supported the research. The design of the study and collection analysis, and interpretation of data and writing of the manuscript was performed by the co-authors as outlined below. Open Access funding provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TJL- Performed neurophysiologic studies, analyzed data, drafted the manuscript for intellectual content, PS - Compiled and analyzed data; revised manuscript for intellectual content, DT- Patient care coordination, revised manuscript for intellectual content, MQ - Supply pathology images and interpretation, TW - Statistical analysis, revised manuscript for intellectual content, SGK - Major role in the acquisition of laboratory data; revised manuscript for intellectual content, NJP - Interpretation and grading of MRI/CT images; revised manuscript for intellectual content EW - Conducting and interpretation of neuropsychological testing; revised manuscript for intellectual content, CCB - Conducting and interpretation of audiology testing; revised manuscript for intellectual content, JJD - Major role in the acquisition of data, KHK – Principal investigator for the protocols. Major role in the acquisition and interpretation of data, revised manuscript for intellectual content. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanya J. Lehky.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Patients were evaluated under clinical protocols, NCT00001813 and NCT00046189, approved by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Institutional Review Boards. Written, informed consent and assent, was obtained from all patients.

Consent for publication

Included in consent to participate.

Competing interests

The authors have no financial disclosures or other conflicts of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lehky, T.J., Sackstein, P., Tamura, D. et al. Differences in peripheral neuropathy in xeroderma pigmentosum complementation groups A and D as evaluated by nerve conduction studies. BMC Neurol 21, 393 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02414-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Xeroderma pigmentosum
  • Peripheral neuropathy
  • Neurodegeneration
  • Sensorineural hearing loss
  • DNA repair
{"cc_re__cc_re__cc_by_4_0": ["e Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit <a href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/\" rel=\"license\" itemprop=\"license\">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a>. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (<a href=\"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/\" rel=\"license\" itemprop=\"license\">http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/</a>) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.</p>\n              <p class=\"c-article-rights\"><a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"view rights and permissions\" data-track-label=\"link\" hre"], "cc_re__cc_re__cc_publicdomain_zero_1_0": ["ise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit <a href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/\" rel=\"license\" itemprop=\"license\">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a>. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (<a href=\"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/\" rel=\"license\" itemprop=\"license\">http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/</a>) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.</p>\n              <p class=\"c-article-rights\"><a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"view rights and permissions\" data-track-label=\"link\" href=\"https://s100.copyright.com/AppDispatchServlet?title=Differences%20in%20peripheral%20neuropathy%20in%20xeroderma%20pigmentosum%20complementation%20groups%20A%20and%20D%20as%20evaluated%20by%20ne"], "copyright__copyright__copyright": ["", "", "ted in a credit line to the data.\n\nReprints and Permissions\n\nAbout this article\n\nCite this article\n\nLehky, T.J., Sackstein, P., Tamura, D. et al. Differences in peripheral neuropathy in xeroderma pigmentosum complementation groups A and D as evaluated by nerve conduction studies. BMC Neurol 21, 393 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02414-2\n\nDownload citation\n\nKeywords\n\n  \u2022 Xeroderma pigmentosum\n  \u2022 Peripheral neuropathy\n  \u2022 Neurodegeneration\n  \u2022 Sensorineural hearing loss\n  \u2022 DNA repair", "ted in a credit line to the data.\n\nReprints and Permissions\n\nAbout this article\n\nCite this article\n\nLehky, T.J., Sackstein, P., Tamura, D. et al. Differences in peripheral neuropathy in xeroderma pigmentosum complementation groups A and D as evaluated by nerve conduction studies. BMC Neurol 21, 393 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02414-2\n\nDownload citation\n\nKeywords\n\n  \u2022 Xeroderma pigmentosum\n  \u2022 Peripheral neuropathy\n  \u2022 Neurodegeneration\n  \u2022 Sensorineural hearing loss\n  \u2022 DNA repair", "ted in a credit line to the data.\n\nReprints and Permissions\n\nAbout this article\n\nCite this article\n\nLehky, T.J., Sackstein, P., Tamura, D. et al. Differences in peripheral neuropathy in xeroderma pigmentosum complementation groups A and D as evaluated by nerve conduction studies. BMC Neurol 21, 393 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02414-2\n\nDownload citation\n\nKeywords\n\n  \u2022 Xeroderma pigmentosum\n  \u2022 Peripheral neuropathy\n  \u2022 Neurodegeneration\n  \u2022 Sensorineural hearing loss\n  \u2022 DNA repair", "ted in a credit line to the data.\n\nReprints and Permissions\n\nAbout this article\n\nCite this article\n\nLehky, T.J., Sackstein, P., Tamura, D. et al. Differences in peripheral neuropathy in xeroderma pigmentosum complementation groups A and D as evaluated by nerve conduction studies. BMC Neurol 21, 393 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02414-2\n\nDownload citation\n\nKeywords\n\n  \u2022 Xeroderma pigmentosum\n  \u2022 Peripheral neuropathy\n  \u2022 Neurodegeneration\n  \u2022 Sensorineural hearing loss\n  \u2022 DNA repair", "ted in a credit line to the data.\n\nReprints and Permissions\n\nAbout this article\n\nCite this article\n\nLehky, T.J., Sackstein, P., Tamura, D. et al. Differences in peripheral neuropathy in xeroderma pigmentosum complementation groups A and D as evaluated by nerve conduction studies. BMC Neurol 21, 393 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02414-2\n\nDownload citation\n\nKeywords\n\n  \u2022 Xeroderma pigmentosum\n  \u2022 Peripheral neuropathy\n  \u2022 Neurodegeneration\n  \u2022 Sensorineural hearing loss\n  \u2022 DNA repair"]}