10 Results Vs. 100 Results / Page Show Different Placement

Jul 14, 2005 • 9:44 am | (1) by | Filed Under Google Search Engine Optimization
 

Well, slightly different placement. If you use Google and do a search on a keyword phrase with the default settings of ten per page, you will see some indented results. If you change your Google search preferences to a higher number displayed on one page, i.e. 100 results per page, you will notice a slight difference. Basically, Google likes to group the results from one site together, with only 10 results on a page, it would be redundant to show five or so results from the same site of the 10 results displayed. But with a 100 results per page, it does not cause the same issue as wit 10 results per page.

There is a thread on this topic at WebmasterWorld.

Previous story: Wayback Machine Sued for Copyright Infringement
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
{"cc_re__cc_re__cc_by_3_0_us": ["The content at <span>\n\t    <a href=\"https://www.seroundtable.com/\">the Search Engine Roundtable </a></span>are the sole opinion of the authors and in no way reflect views of RustyBrick &reg;, Inc<br />\n\t    Copyright &copy; 1994-2018 <span>\n\t    <a href=\"http://www.rustybrick.com\">RustyBrick &reg;</a></span>, Inc. <span>\n\t    <a href=\"http://www.rustybrick.com/services.php\">Web Development</a></span> All Rights Reserved.<br />\n\t    This work by Search Engine Roundtable is licensed under a <span><a href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/\">Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.</a></span> Creative Commons License </p>\n\n\t</div>\n\t<!-- footer end-->\n\n\t\n</div>\n<!--container end-->\n\n<script>\n  (function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){\n  (i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),\n  m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)\n  })(window,document,'script','//www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js','ga');\n\n  ga('creat"], "copyright__copyright__copyright": ["00 results per page, you will notice a slight difference. Basically, Google likes to group the results from one site together, with only 10 results on a page, it would be redundant to show five or so results from the same site of the 10 results displayed. But with a 100 results per page, it does not cause the same issue as wit 10 results per page.\n\nThere is a thread on this topic at WebmasterWorld.\n\nPrevious story: Wayback Machine Sued for Copyright Infringement\n\u00a0\nblog comments powered by Disqus", "00 results per page, you will notice a slight difference. Basically, Google likes to group the results from one site together, with only 10 results on a page, it would be redundant to show five or so results from the same site of the 10 results displayed. But with a 100 results per page, it does not cause the same issue as wit 10 results per page.\n\nThere is a thread on this topic at WebmasterWorld.\n\nPrevious story: Wayback Machine Sued for Copyright Infringement\n\u00a0\nblog comments powered by Disqus", "00 results per page, you will notice a slight difference. Basically, Google likes to group the results from one site together, with only 10 results on a page, it would be redundant to show five or so results from the same site of the 10 results displayed. But with a 100 results per page, it does not cause the same issue as wit 10 results per page.\n\nThere is a thread on this topic at WebmasterWorld.\n\nPrevious story: Wayback Machine Sued for Copyright Infringement\n\u00a0\nblog comments powered by Disqus", "00 results per page, you will notice a slight difference. Basically, Google likes to group the results from one site together, with only 10 results on a page, it would be redundant to show five or so results from the same site of the 10 results displayed. But with a 100 results per page, it does not cause the same issue as wit 10 results per page.\n\nThere is a thread on this topic at WebmasterWorld.\n\nPrevious story: Wayback Machine Sued for Copyright Infringement\n\u00a0\nblog comments powered by Disqus"]}