Talk:Coach Companies

From Grand Theft Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Should all the Coach companies be redirected here?--spaceeinstein 03:48, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

No. Each business, like every character and every vehicle, should have its own article. A-Dust 12:20, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Even if it takes only one line to describe the business? There are already examples that does this (trailers, Acts at Perestroika).--spaceeinstein 18:03, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
I think so. Otherwise we could easily just join plenty of other articles up. This is meant to be a website providing information about the series, so there is no need to keep merging ever increasing amounts of articles into a smaller number. Not in my opinion anyway. A-Dust 02:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
{"cc_re__cc_re__cc_by_sa_3_0": ["oach_Companies&amp;oldid=307863\" title=\"Permanent link to this revision of the page\">Permanent Link</a></li><li id=\"t-info\"><a href=\"/index.php?title=Talk:Coach_Companies&amp;action=info\" title=\"More information about this page\">Page information</a></li> </ul>\n</div>\n</div>\n</div>\n</div>\n<div id=\"footer\" role=\"contentinfo\">\n<ul id=\"footer-info\">\n<li id=\"footer-info-lastmod\"> This page was last modified on 29 December 2010, at 02:03.</li>\n<li id=\"footer-info-copyright\">Content is available under <a class=\"external\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/\">Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported</a> unless otherwise noted.</li>\n</ul>\n<ul id=\"footer-places\">\n<li id=\"footer-places-privacy\"><a href=\"/Grand_Theft_Wiki:Privacy_policy\" class=\"mw-redirect\" title=\"Grand Theft Wiki:Privacy policy\">Privacy policy</a></li>\n<li id=\"footer-places-about\"><a href=\"/Grand_Theft_Wiki:About\" title=\"Grand Theft Wiki:About\">About Grand Theft Wiki - The GTA Wiki</a></li>\n<li id=\"footer-places-disclaimer\"><a href=\"/Grand_Theft_Wiki:Licensing\" title=\"Grand Theft Wiki:Licens", " Theft Wiki:About\">About Grand Theft Wiki - The GTA Wiki</a></li>\n<li id=\"footer-places-disclaimer\"><a href=\"/Grand_Theft_Wiki:Licensing\" title=\"Grand Theft Wiki:Licensing\">Content Licensing &amp; Copyright</a></li>\n<li id=\"footer-places-mobileview\"><a href=\"http://www.grandtheftwiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Coach_Companies&amp;mobileaction=toggle_view_mobile\" class=\"noprint stopMobileRedirectToggle\">Mobile View</a></li>\n</ul>\n<ul id=\"footer-icons\" class=\"noprint\">\n<li id=\"footer-copyrightico\">\n<a href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/\" target=\"_blank\"><img src=\"http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/3.0/88x31.png\" alt=\"Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported\" width=\"88\" height=\"31\"/></a> </li>\n</ul>\n<div style=\"clear:both\"></div>\n</div>\n<script>(window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({\"wgPageParseReport\":{\"limitreport\":{\"cputime\":\"0.004\",\"walltime\":\"0.005\",\"ppvisitednodes\":{\"value\":1,\"limit\":1000000},\"ppgeneratednodes\":{\"value\":4,\"limit\":1000000},\"postexpandincludesize\":{\"value\":0,\"limit\":2097152},\"templateargumentsize\":{\"value\":0"], "copyright__copyright__copyright": ["ecember 2010 (UTC)\nEven if it takes only one line to describe the business? There are already examples that does this (trailers, Acts at Perestroika).--spaceeinstein 18:03, 26 December 2010 (UTC)\nI think so. Otherwise we could easily just join plenty of other articles up. This is meant to be a website providing information about the series, so there is no need to keep merging ever increasing amounts of articles into a smaller number. Not in my opinion anyway. A-Dust 02:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC)", "ecember 2010 (UTC)\nEven if it takes only one line to describe the business? There are already examples that does this (trailers, Acts at Perestroika).--spaceeinstein 18:03, 26 December 2010 (UTC)\nI think so. Otherwise we could easily just join plenty of other articles up. This is meant to be a website providing information about the series, so there is no need to keep merging ever increasing amounts of articles into a smaller number. Not in my opinion anyway. A-Dust 02:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC)", "ecember 2010 (UTC)\nEven if it takes only one line to describe the business? There are already examples that does this (trailers, Acts at Perestroika).--spaceeinstein 18:03, 26 December 2010 (UTC)\nI think so. Otherwise we could easily just join plenty of other articles up. This is meant to be a website providing information about the series, so there is no need to keep merging ever increasing amounts of articles into a smaller number. Not in my opinion anyway. A-Dust 02:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC)", "ecember 2010 (UTC)\nEven if it takes only one line to describe the business? There are already examples that does this (trailers, Acts at Perestroika).--spaceeinstein 18:03, 26 December 2010 (UTC)\nI think so. Otherwise we could easily just join plenty of other articles up. This is meant to be a website providing information about the series, so there is no need to keep merging ever increasing amounts of articles into a smaller number. Not in my opinion anyway. A-Dust 02:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC)", "ecember 2010 (UTC)\nEven if it takes only one line to describe the business? There are already examples that does this (trailers, Acts at Perestroika).--spaceeinstein 18:03, 26 December 2010 (UTC)\nI think so. Otherwise we could easily just join plenty of other articles up. This is meant to be a website providing information about the series, so there is no need to keep merging ever increasing amounts of articles into a smaller number. Not in my opinion anyway. A-Dust 02:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC)", "ecember 2010 (UTC)\nEven if it takes only one line to describe the business? There are already examples that does this (trailers, Acts at Perestroika).--spaceeinstein 18:03, 26 December 2010 (UTC)\nI think so. Otherwise we could easily just join plenty of other articles up. This is meant to be a website providing information about the series, so there is no need to keep merging ever increasing amounts of articles into a smaller number. Not in my opinion anyway. A-Dust 02:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC)", "ecember 2010 (UTC)\nEven if it takes only one line to describe the business? There are already examples that does this (trailers, Acts at Perestroika).--spaceeinstein 18:03, 26 December 2010 (UTC)\nI think so. Otherwise we could easily just join plenty of other articles up. This is meant to be a website providing information about the series, so there is no need to keep merging ever increasing amounts of articles into a smaller number. Not in my opinion anyway. A-Dust 02:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC)", "ecember 2010 (UTC)\nEven if it takes only one line to describe the business? There are already examples that does this (trailers, Acts at Perestroika).--spaceeinstein 18:03, 26 December 2010 (UTC)\nI think so. Otherwise we could easily just join plenty of other articles up. This is meant to be a website providing information about the series, so there is no need to keep merging ever increasing amounts of articles into a smaller number. Not in my opinion anyway. A-Dust 02:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC)", "ecember 2010 (UTC)\nEven if it takes only one line to describe the business? There are already examples that does this (trailers, Acts at Perestroika).--spaceeinstein 18:03, 26 December 2010 (UTC)\nI think so. Otherwise we could easily just join plenty of other articles up. This is meant to be a website providing information about the series, so there is no need to keep merging ever increasing amounts of articles into a smaller number. Not in my opinion anyway. A-Dust 02:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC)", "ecember 2010 (UTC)\nEven if it takes only one line to describe the business? There are already examples that does this (trailers, Acts at Perestroika).--spaceeinstein 18:03, 26 December 2010 (UTC)\nI think so. Otherwise we could easily just join plenty of other articles up. This is meant to be a website providing information about the series, so there is no need to keep merging ever increasing amounts of articles into a smaller number. Not in my opinion anyway. A-Dust 02:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC)"]}