How do the powers of the church's leaders interact with general laws and the rights of individuals? 
### Query ###
How do the powers of the church's leaders interact with general laws and the rights of individuals? 

### Source ###
**PHILOSOPHY_OF_RIGHT_214 **
214 PHILOSOPHY OF RIGHT.
which was the view of the canonists and casuists of the
sixteenth century above referred to.
As the States stand in relation with each other, it is
necessary to examine the nature of these relations. States
are born, grow, and die like individuals ; and so, too, they
have rights: primitive, originary, and absolute rights;
and relative or derivative rights.
State personality or sovereignty is acquired with tlie
foundation of a State, or by its withdrawal from foreign
domination. In order to be valid it is not requisite that
it be recognised or guaranteed by the foreign powers, but
that the possession of it be not defective or faulty. It is
not usual to acknowledge the insurrection of a people, or
the usurpation of a prince, so long as the sovereign who
is regarded as legitimate is not supposed to have re-
nounced. The sovereignty ceases with the destruction of
the territory of a State, whether it be by the dissolution
of the social bond, or by incorporation, union, or total or
partial subjection to another State, When a State de-
pends on another in the exercise of one or several rights
inherent in the sovereignty, but is free in the rest, it is
called dependent or semi-sovereign. This limitation
usually applies to the rights of external sovereignty, the
exercise of which belongs in whole or in part to another
State, and it depends upon the conventions which it has
contracted. Tiie external relations are regulated by such
conventions and by the state of possession.


**SpencerJustice_2023_001 **
$ 108. Spencer's Sub-human Justice. Spencer has
developed’ his ethico-juristic conception in a recent
book, ‘Justice. Following his theory of connecting
moral laws with the most general laws of the cos-
mos, and of rendering ethics more deductive, he begins
by speaking of a morality of animals and a sub-
human justice. Moral and human conduct is a part
of conduct in general, that is, of the sum total of
the acts of various beings which are adapted to
their own purposes. Among animals, the more perfect
conduct tends toa longer, more ample and complete life,
and is connected with the two principles which insure
the continuance of the species. The first is the natural
protection of offspring not able to take care of them-
selves. The second is that the adult himself should
realize all the advantages and disadvantages of his
acts. Sub-human justice means that every individual
is subject to the consequences of his nature and con-


SPENCER'S SUB-HUMAN JUSTICE — 225


dition. It advances as organization progresses. The
primal law for all being is that of the relationship
between conduct and its consequences. Then comes
the other law (fundamentally the same) of common
life, since it prescribes limitations. The second law
orders that the acts through which an individual
seeks advantages and avoids disadvantages should be
limited by the necessity of leaving the way free to
similar acts on the part of his associates. There is
a third law which restricts the application of the first
and in certain circumstances sacrifices the individual
for the species. Human justice is the development of
sub-human justice. Fundamentally and essentially both
are of the same nature, parts of a whole. In general,
justice is characterized by self-subordination to the
bonds of relationship, of social limitations, and of the
health of the species or community. Among the social
sentiments, which are the product of evolution, is found
the sentiment of justice. Justice is the extirpation
of selfish sentiments which arise when an animal
resists the restrictions put upon the acts of his spon-
taneous life, and can become the object of altruistic
sentiments which presuppose the more or less ample
development of sympathy and are connected more
properly with the régime of voluntary codperation.


**DINO-CHRONICLE-1293-001 **
2.  1293,  New  Style  (cf.  above,  Chap.  III.  n.  1).  Giano
sprang  from  a  noble  Ghibelline  family  (see  Par.  xvi.  131,
132  n.).  It  might  be  supposed  from  a  perusal  of  this
chapter  that  the  whole  of  the  legislation  described  in  it
dated  from  the  Priorate  of  Giano.  It  is  therefore  important
to  bear  in  mind  that  the  Ordinances  of  Justice,  in  their
original  form,  had  become  law  on  January  18,  1293,  before
the  Priorate  of  Giano  ;  that  they  were,  as  to  some  of  their
provisions,  a  re-enactment  of  previously  existing  laws  (see
below,  notes  6,  8),  and  that  one  of  the  most  important
of  the  provisions  singled  out  for  notice  by  Dino  was  sub-
sequent to  Giano's  priorate  (see  below,  n.  9).  Giano  was,
however,  the  leader  of  the  movement  which  resulted  in  this
legislation,  and  this  may  very  probably  be  the  reason  why
Dino  groups  it  all  under  his  priorate  (cf.  II.  25,  n.  13).
C


30   CHRONICLE  OF  DINO  COMPAGNI


3.  We  have  seen  (I.  4)  that  one  Prior  was  chosen  from
each  Sesto.  Similarly,  the  Gonfalonier  was  chosen  from
each  Sesto  in  rotation,  so  that  in  every  year  each  Sesto  fur-
nished one  Gonfalonier.  The  Priors  and  Gonfalonier  were
henceforth  collectively  known  as  the  Signory.  The  office  of
Gonfalonier  was  not  an  absolute  novelty,  two  officers  with
similar  functions  having  been  instituted  in  1289  (Salvemini,
Magnati  e  Popolani,  p.  157).    These  were  now  abolished.
4.  Not  the  arms  of  the  Commonwealth  (see  I.  10,  n.  3),
but  a  device  invented  for  this  officer  and  his  men,  whose
business  it  was  to  enforce  obedience  to  the  Ordinances.


**Sabbath_Debate_001 **
True. Bu. Whether then ought I to relieve a city in danger, neglect-
ing the sabbath or not? Fi. Do you think me a Jew then? Bu. I
wish you were, and a circumcised one too. Fi. The Lord himself had
Bolved that difficulty, saying, the sabbath was made for man, and not
man for the sabbath. Bu. Well, then, is that law of force in ali
human constitutions. Fi. Yes, except anything obstruct Bu.
What if a lawmaker make a law, not with this design, that it should
be obligatory upon the pain of eternai damnation, nor indeed unto any
guilt, and to have no other force but an exhortation ? Fi. Good man,
is it not in the law maker 's power how far the law shall be binding ? He
uses his authority in making the law, but as to what it shall oblige to,
and what not, that is in the hand of God.
Bu, Why, then, do we hear our parish priests out of the pulpit
crying, "To-morrow you must fast, under pain of eternai damnation/' if
it does not appear to us how far a human law is binding? Fi. They
do this that they may in an especial manner strike terror into the
contumacious, for I presume those words do properly belong to them.


**unjust_wars_protection **
We live among nations who frequently wage unjust
wars; who, disregarding the rights of others, oppress,


^


;:|^


i

I

IKTRODUCTION. 16

and rob, and even muider tlieir citizens, in order to reach

some unrìgkteous end. As indìvìduals, we buìld fences

and walls for the protection of oux grounds and our mer-

chandise ; so, as a nation, we buìld ships and forts to \. J'

protect our commerce, our harbors, and our cities. But [ ,|^-

the widls of our bouses and stores are us^ess, unless

made so strong and high that the robber cannot break

through or scale them without great effort and personal

danger ; so our national ships and forts would be utterly

useless for protection, unless fully armed and equipped.

### Analysis ###
The user's query asks about the interaction between the powers of church leaders and general laws, as well as the rights of individuals. The references provided cover a range of topics from philosophical perspectives on state and human rights to specific historical and religious contexts. The most relevant references for answering this query include:

1. **PHILOSOPHY_OF_RIGHT_214**: Discusses the nature of state rights and sovereignty, which can be related to the authority of church leaders within a state.
2. **SpencerJustice_2023_001**: Explores the evolution of justice and moral laws, touching upon how these principles might apply to both individual and communal rights.
3. **Sabbath_Debate_001**: Provides a dialogue highlighting the conflict between personal obligations and state or religious laws.
4. **unjust_wars_protection**: Talks about national defense and protection of rights, which can be extended to the role of church leaders in protecting individual rights within their jurisdiction.

These references provide a comprehensive view of the interplay between ecclesiastical power, legal frameworks, and individual liberties.

### Answer ###
The interaction between the powers of the church's leaders and general laws, alongside the rights of individuals, is multifaceted and historically contingent. The concept of state sovereignty and its implications for church authority is significant. States acquire sovereignty at their foundation, which is not contingent on recognition by other powers unless there is a defect in possession<ref name="PHILOSOPHY_OF_RIGHT_214">"State personality or sovereignty is acquired with the foundation of a State, or by its withdrawal from foreign domination."</ref>. This principle can be extrapolated to the church, suggesting that its authority derives from internal legitimacy rather than external validation.

Moreover, the evolution of justice as described by Spencer highlights that moral and human conduct are part of a broader cosmic law<ref name="SpencerJustice_2023_001">"Moral and human conduct is a part of conduct in general, that is, of the sum total of the acts of various beings which are adapted to their own purposes."</ref>. This implies that just laws should promote the general welfare and limit individual actions to ensure communal harmony and species continuity<ref name="SpencerJustice_2023_001">"Justice is characterized by self-subordination to the bonds of relationship, of social limitations, and of the health of the species or community."</ref>.

In historical contexts, such as during the Renaissance, church leaders like Giano della Soldania played crucial roles in legislative reforms aimed at enhancing justice and limiting the power imbalances among social classes<ref name="DINO-CHRONICLE-1293-001">"Giano was, however, the leader of the movement which resulted in this legislation, and this may very probably be the reason why Dino groups it all under his priorate."</ref>. These reforms often involved re-enacting or reinforcing existing laws to ensure they aligned with societal needs<ref name="DINO-CHRONICLE-1293-001">"They were, as to some of their provisions, a re-enactment of previously existing laws."</ref>.

The tension between personal obligations and state or religious laws is also evident in historical debates. For instance, during the Sabbath Debate, participants discussed whether personal obligations (such as observing religious holidays) should take precedence over state laws<ref name="Sabbath_Debate_001">"The Lord himself had solved that difficulty, saying, the sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath."</ref>. This reflects a broader debate about the limits of religious authority and the extent to which it should conform to secular laws.

Finally, the role of church leaders in protecting individual rights is analogous to the national defense against external threats<ref name="unjust_wars_protection">"As individuals, we build fences and walls for the protection of our grounds and our merchandise; so, as a nation, we build ships and forts to protect our commerce, our harbors, and our cities."</ref>. Just as nations arm themselves to protect their citizens, churches may assert their authority to protect the spiritual and moral rights of their followers.

In summary, the powers of church leaders interact with general laws and individual rights through a combination of inherent authority, moral principles, legislative influence, and ethical debates. These interactions are shaped by the legitimacy of the church within its domain and the evolving moral landscape of society. 