ITEM 1. BUSINESS
The Company
Kansas City Power & Light Company (Company) was incorporated in Missouri in 1922 and is headquartered in downtown Kansas City, Missouri. The Company is a medium-sized public utility engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity to over 419,000 customers in a 4,700 square mile area located in all or portions of 23 counties in western Missouri and eastern Kansas. About two-thirds of the total retail kilowatt-hour sales and revenue are from Missouri customers and the remainder from Kansas customers. Customers include 368,000 residences, 49,000 commercial firms, 2,000 industries, 12 municipalities and 25 other electric utilities. Retail revenues in Missouri and Kansas accounted for approximately 91% of the Company's total revenues in 1993. Wholesale firm power, bulk power sales and miscellaneous electric revenues accounted for the remainder of revenues. The Kansas City metropolitan area, from which about 95% of the Company's retail revenues are derived, is an agribusiness center and a major regional commercial center for wholesale, retail and service companies.
The Company as a regulated utility does not have direct competition for retail electric service in its service territory; however, there is competition in the generation of electricity and between electric and gas as an energy source.
Regulation
The Company is subject to the jurisdiction of the Public Service Commission of the State of Missouri (MPSC), the State Corporation Commission of the State of Kansas (KCC), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and certain other governmental regulatory bodies as to various phases of its operations, including rates, service, safety and nuclear plant operations, environmental matters and issuances of securities.
Rates
The Company's retail electric rates are regulated by the MPSC and KCC for sales within the respective states of Missouri and Kansas. FERC approves the Company's rates for wholesale bulk electricity sales. Firm electric sales are made by contractual arrangements between the entity being served and the Company.
The Company has not increased any of its retail or wholesale rates since 1988. Pursuant to a stipulation and agreement with the MPSC, the Company reduced Missouri retail rates by about 2.7 percent effective January 1, 1994 and agreed to a moratorium through 1995 on the filing of general retail rate increases or decreases in Missouri.
Environmental Matters
The Company, like other electric utilities, is subject to regulation by various federal, state and local authorities with respect to air and water emissions, waste disposal and other environmental matters. Environmental regulations and standards are subject to continual review and the Company cannot presently estimate the additional cost, if any, of meeting any new regulations or standards which might be established in the future, nor can it estimate the possible effect which any new regulations or standards could have upon its operations. However, the Company currently estimates that expenditures necessary to comply with environmental regulations during 1994 will not be material with the possible exceptions set forth below.
Air
The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 contain acid rain and air toxic provisions which affect the Company. The acid rain provisions established a two-phase utility pollution control program for reducing national SO2 emissions by 10 million tons and NOx emissions by 2 million tons from 1980 levels. Compliance will require the Company to install continuous emission monitoring equipment (CEM) at some of its coal-fired electric generating facilities during the period ending in the year 2000. The Company is currently estimating its costs of such compliance to be approximately $4.1 million during such period ($2.9 million of such amount was spent through 1993). The other utility-related provision of the Act calls for a study by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of certain toxic emissions into the air. Based on the outcome of these studies, regulation of certain toxic emissions into the air, including mercury, could be required in the future.
Water
The Company commissioned an environmental assessment of its Northeast Station and of its Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure plan as required by the Clean Water Act. The assessment revealed contamination of the site by petroleum products, heavy metals, volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds, asbestos, pesticides and other regulated substances. Based upon studies and discussions with Burns & McDonnell, the cost of the cleanup could range between $1.5 million and $6 million.
Also, groundwater analysis has indicated that certain volatile organic compounds are moving through the Northeast site, just above bedrock, from unidentified sources off-site. There is no evidence that the Company released these compounds; however, notice was given to the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). MDNR has not responded to date to the notice. Because the Company believes it will not have liability in this matter, it has not performed a study regarding the possible cost of remediation.
Waste Disposal
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (Superfund) established joint and several liability for persons and entities that generate, transport or deposit hazardous waste at contaminated sites, as well as the current owners of such sites and predecessors in title since the time such sites were contaminated.
Interstate Power Company of Dubuque, Iowa (Interstate) filed a lawsuit in 1989 against the Company in the Federal District Court for the District of Iowa seeking from the Company contribution and indemnity under the Superfund for clean-up costs of hazardous substances at the site of a demolished gas manufacturing plant in Mason City, Iowa. The plant was operated by the Company for very brief periods of time before the plant was demolished in 1952. The site and all other properties the Company owned in Iowa were sold to Interstate in 1957. The Company estimates that the cleanup could cost up to $10 million. The Company's estimate is based upon an evaluation of available information from on-going site investigation and assessment activities, including the costs of such activities.
Fuel Supply
The Company's latest fuel budget anticipates that fuel used for its electric generating requirements during 1994 will be approximately 73.7% coal, 0.3% gas, 0.3% oil, 25.6% nuclear and 0.1% steam.
Coal
The Company currently projects that during 1994 9.7 million tons of coal will be burned at all of the Company's generating units (including jointly-owned units); 6.7 million tons will be burned for the Company's account. The long-term contractual arrangements for coal for the Company's account are as follows:
Average Year Undelivered 1994 Sulfur of Maximum Contract Content Supplier and Expir- Quantities Designations of Coal Surface Mine Location ation (Tons) (Tons) %
Rochelle Coal Company Wright, Wyoming....... 1999(a) 2,544,000 1,100,000 0.2 ARCO Coal Company Wright, Wyoming....... 2003 15,680,000(b) 1,610,000(b) 0.3
Total 18,224,000 2,710,000
(a) Contract is effective until December 31, 1999 or until the maximum quantity of coal is delivered, whichever occurs first. It is estimated the maximum quantity of coal will be delivered by December 31, 1996.
(b) Company's share of coal under contract for jointly-owned units.
These long-term contracts supply 40% of the Company's anticipated coal requirements for 1994, and the remainder will be supplied by open market purchases.
The Company's average costs of coal burned for its account, exclusive of fuel handling costs, for the past three years are as follows:
1993 1992 1991 Cost per million BTU..........$ 0.962 $ 1.022 $ 1.059 Cost per ton..................$16.66 $17.87 $18.79
Gas
Natural gas is purchased directly from natural gas producers or marketers. The Company's Hawthorn Station, which uses coal as boiler fuel, primarily uses gas for ignition and flame stabilization purposes. When available, natural gas can also be used as a supplementary fuel to generate electricity at Hawthorn when required for environmental or other temporary operating conditions. The Company also has facilities at Hawthorn to use oil for ignition and flame stabilization purposes because of possible interruptions in the availability of gas. The Company's use of gas for electric generation was 0.7 million mcf in 1991, 0.2 million mcf in 1992 and 0.4 million mcf in 1993. For the year ended December 31, 1993, the average cost of gas burned for electric generation was $2.51 per million BTU.
Oil
Middle distillate fuel oil is used to operate the Company's eight peak load combustion turbine generating units, for ignition and flame stabilization purposes at other fossil fueled units and to fuel auxiliary boilers at the Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Wolf Creek). In 1993, the Company used about 20,000 barrels of fuel oil at its combustion turbine, about 34,000 barrels for ignition and flame stabilization purposes and about 3,000 barrels at Wolf Creek. The Company's share of fuel oil storage capacity is about 190,000 barrels. At December 31, 1993, the Company had about 101,100 barrels of fuel oil in storage at an average cost of $27.43 per barrel, or $4.73 per million BTU.
Nuclear
The Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC), which operates Wolf Creek, has on hand or under contract 73% of the uranium required to operate Wolf Creek through the year 2001, and the balance is expected to be obtained through open market or contract purchases.
Contracts are in place for 100% of Wolf Creek's uranium fuel enrichment services requirements for 1994-1996, 70% of such requirements for 1997-1998, and 100% of such requirements for 2002-2014. The balance of the requirements is expected to be obtained through a combination of open market and contract purchases.
Contracts are in place for the conversion of sufficient uranium to uranium hexaflouride to meet Wolf Creek's uranium fuel requirements through 1995 as well as for the fabrication of uranium fuel assemblies to meet Wolf Creek's requirements through 2014.
High-Level Waste
The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 established schedules, guidelines and responsibilities for the United States Department of Energy (DOE) to develop and construct repositories for the ultimate disposal of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear high-level waste. The DOE has not yet constructed a high-level nuclear waste disposal site and has announced that a permanent storage facility for such waste may not be in operation prior to 2013, although an interim facility may be available earlier. Wolf Creek contains a temporary on-site spent nuclear fuel storage facility which, under current regulatory guidelines, provides space for the storage of spent nuclear fuel from plant operation until approximately 2006, while still maintaining full core off-load nuclear fuel storage capability. The Company believes adequate additional temporary storage space for Wolf Creek's nuclear waste can be obtained, as necessary.
Low-Level Waste
The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 mandated that the various states, individually or through interstate compacts, develop alternative low-level radioactive waste disposal facilities to replace the three currently-available facilities in South Carolina, Nevada and Washington.
The states of Kansas, Nebraska, Arkansas, Louisiana and Oklahoma formed the Central Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Compact and selected a site in northern Nebraska to locate a disposal facility. The present estimate of the cost for such a facility is about $146 million. WCNOC and the owners of the other five nuclear units in the compact have provided most of the pre-construction financing for this project. To date, the compact has spent in excess of $55 million, of which $6.8 million was WCNOC's share. If WCNOC and the owners of the other nuclear units in the compact elect to provide construction financing, WCNOC's share would be about $9.6 million.
There is uncertainty as to whether this project will be completed. Significant opposition to the project has been raised by the residents in the area of the proposed facility and attempts have been made to pass legislation in Nebraska to slow down or stop development of the facility. In January 1993, a lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court by the Nebraska Attorney General seeking to halt further development of the proposed facility. The trial court rendered judgment against the Attorney General, but the decision has been appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals. Although all federally- imposed milestones have been met in the past, the compact did not meet the last milestone of having a disposal facility in operation by January 1, 1993; however, none of the other eight compacts in the United States met this deadline. WCNOC has expanded its on-site temporary storage capacity in order to handle its low-level radioactive waste until such time as a disposal facility becomes available.
Employees
At December 31, 1993, the Company had 2,735 employees (including temporary employees), 1,809 of which were represented by three local unions of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW). However, the Company announced an early retirement program in March 1994. See "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Subsequent Event" on page 36 of this report. Included in the total number of employees are 315 located at LaCygne Generating Station (LaCygne), 50% of whose services are attributable to Kansas Gas and Electric Company (KG&E) for its 50% share of LaCygne, and 137 located at Iatan Generating Station (Iatan), 30% of whose services are attributable to St. Joseph Light & Power Company (SJLP) and the Empire District Electric Company (EDE) for their 18% and 12% shares of Iatan, respectively. The Company has labor agreements with Local 1613, representing clerical employees (which expires March 29, 1996), with Local 1464, representing outdoor workers (which expires January 8, 1997), and with Local 412, representing power plant workers (which expires March 5, 1995). The Company is also a 47% owner of WCNOC, which employs 1,242 persons to operate Wolf Creek, 308 of which are represented by the IBEW.
Subsidiaries
KLT Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, was formed in 1992 as a holding company for various non-regulated business opportunities. Currently KLT Inc., has three wholly owned subsidiaries which include KLT Investments Inc. which is a passive investor in economic and community development and energy related investments; KLT Energy Services Inc., which is a partner in an energy management services business; and KLT Power Inc., which was formed in 1993 to participate in independent power and cogeneration projects. The Company's equity investment in the KLT companies is currently $9.5 million ($4.5 million was invested as of December 31, 1993).
Subsequent Financing Events
Since December 31, 1993, the Company has redeemed $13,982,500 its portion of the outstanding $30,000,000 City of LaCygne, Kansas Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Kansas City Power & Light Company - Kansas Gas and Electric Company) Series 1973 and $21,940,000 City of LaCygne, Kansas Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds (Kansas City Power & Light Company Project) Series 1977 with the issuance of $35,922,500 City of LaCygne, Kansas, Environmental Improvement Revenue Refunding Bonds (Kansas City Power & Light Company Project) Series 1994.
Officers of the Registrant Year Elected Name Age Positions Currently Held as an Officer
Drue Jennings 47 Chairman of the Board, President 1980 and Chief Executive Officer
Bernard J. Beaudoin 53 Senior Vice President-Finance 1984 Chief Financial Officer
Samuel P. Cowley 59 Senior Vice President-Corporate 1977 Affairs, Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Secretary
Ronald G. Wasson 49 Senior Vice President-Administrative 1983 & Technical Services
Frank L. Branca 46 Vice President-Power Supply 1989
Charles R. Cole 47 Vice President-Customer Services 1990
James L. Hogan 63 Vice President-Environmental & 1984 Research Services
Marcus Jackson 42 Vice President-Power Production 1989
Turner White* 44 Vice President-Communications 1990
John J. DeStefano 44 Treasurer 1989
Jeanie Sell Latz 42 Corporate Secretary 1991
Neil Roadman 48 Controller 1980
Mark C. Sholander 48 General Counsel and Assistant 1986 Secretary
* All of the foregoing persons have been officers of the Company or employees in a responsible position with the Company for the past five years except for Mr. White. Mr. White has been with the Company since 1989; prior to that he was Vice President, Public Relations of Bernstein-Rein Advertising, Inc. from 1986 to 1989.
The term of office of each officer commences with his or her appointment by the Board of Directors and ends at such time as the Board of Directors may determine.
ITEM 2.


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Generation Resources
The Company's generating facilities consist of the following:
Estimated Year Megawatt(mw) Unit Completed Capacity Fuel Existing Units Base Load..Wolf Creek(a) 1985 545(b) Nuclear Iatan 1980 469(b) Coal LaCygne 2 1977 335(b) Coal LaCygne 1 1973 343(b) Coal Hawthorn 5 1969 457 Coal/Gas Montrose 3 1964 161 Coal Montrose 2 1960 152 Coal Montrose 1 1958 150 Coal Peak Load..Northeast 13 and 14(c) 1976 112 Oil Northeast 17 and 18(c) 1977 108 Oil Northeast 15 and 16(c) 1975 103 Oil Northeast 11 and 12(c) 1972 99 Oil Grand Avenue (2 units) 1929 & 1948 64 Gas Total 3,098
(a) This unit is one of the Company's principal generating facilities and has the lowest fuel cost of any of its generating facilities. Any extended shutdown of the unit for any reason could have a substantial adverse effect on the operations of the Company and its financial condition.
(b) Company's share of jointly-owned unit.
(c) Combustion turbines.
The Company's maximum system net hourly peak load of 2,819 mw occurred on August 17, 1993. The maximum winter peak load of 1,829 mw occurred on December 21, 1989. The accredited generating capacity of the Company's electric facilities in the summer (when peak loads are experienced) of 1993 under MOKAN Power Pool standards was 3,085 mw.
The Company owns the Hawthorn Station (Jackson County, Missouri), Montrose Station (Henry County, Missouri), Northeast Station (Jackson County, Missouri) and two Grand Avenue Station turbine generators (Jackson County, Missouri). The Company also owns 50% of the 685-mw LaCygne 1 Unit and 670-mw LaCygne 2 Unit in Linn County, Kansas; 70% of the 670-mw Iatan Station in Platte County, Missouri; and 47% of the 1,160 mw Wolf Creek in Coffey County, Kansas.
Transmission and Distribution Resources
The Company's electric transmission system is interconnected with systems of other utilities to permit bulk power transactions with other electricity suppliers in Kansas, Missouri, Iowa, Nebraska and Minnesota. The Company is a member of the MOKAN Power Pool, which is a contractual arrangement among eleven utilities in western Missouri and Kansas which interchange electric energy, share reserve generating capacity, and provide emergency and standby electricity services to each other.
The Company owns approximately 1,700 miles of transmission lines and approximately 8,900 miles of overhead distribution lines, and approximately 2,800 miles of underground distribution lines. The Company has all franchises necessary to sell electricity within the territories from which substantially all of its gross operating revenue is derived.
General
The Company's principal plants and properties, insofar as they constitute real estate, are owned in fee; certain other facilities are located on premises held under leases, permits or easements; and its electric transmission and distribution systems are for the most part located over or under highways, streets, other public places or property owned by others for which permits, grants, easements or licenses (deemed satisfactory but without examination of underlying land titles) have been obtained.
Substantially all of the fixed property and franchises of the Company, which consists principally of electric generating stations, electric transmission and distribution lines and systems, and buildings (subject to exceptions and reservations) are subject to a General Mortgage Indenture and Deed of Trust dated as of December 1, 1986. The last series of mortgage bonds under the Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust dated as of December 1, 1946 (1946 Mortgage) secured the City of LaCygne pollution control bonds (Pollution Bonds) which were refinanced in the first quarter of 1994--see "Subsequent Financing Events" on page 6. Upon the redemption of the Pollution Bonds on March 1, 1994, the 1946 mortgage was discharged.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Inter-City Beverage Co., Inc. et. al vs. Kansas City Power & Light Company
On August 13, 1993, a lawsuit was filed by nine customers in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri against the Company. The suit alleged the misapplication of certain of the Company's electric rate tariffs resulting in overcharges to industrial and commercial customers which have been provided service under those tariffs and requested certification as a class action. On December 3, 1993, the Court postponed ruling on motion to certify as a class action, and dismissed the matter for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The plaintiff appealed to the Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. The Company has not yet determined the amount of the alleged overcharges. The Company believes it will be able to successfully defend this action.
See "Environmental Matters - Waste Disposal" on page 3 and "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Tax Matters" on page 31 of this report.
ITEM 4.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matter was submitted during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.
PART II
ITEM 5.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Market Information:
(1) Principal Market:
Common Stock of the Company is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and the Chicago Stock Exchange.
(2) Stock Price Information:
Common Stock Price Range 1993 1992 Quarter High Low High Low
First $25-1/8 $22 $23-3/4 $19-7/8 Second 25-1/4 23-1/2 22-1/2 20-5/8 Third 26-1/4 24-3/8 24-1/2 21-7/8 Fourth 25 21-3/4 23-1/4 21-3/4
Holders:
At December 31, 1993, the Company's Common Stock was held by 31,267 shareholders of record.
Dividends:
Common Stock dividends were declared as follows:
Quarter 1994 1993 1992 First $0.37 $0.36 $0.35 Second 0.36 0.36 Third 0.37 0.36 Fourth 0.37 0.36
The Company's Restated Articles of Consolidation contains certain restrictions on the payment of dividends on the Company's Common Stock.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
KILOWATT (KWH) SALES AND OPERATING REVENUES Sales and revenue data: Increase (Decrease) From Prior Year 1993 1992 KWH Revenues KWH Revenues (Millions) (Millions) Retail sales: Residential 13 % $ 30 (12)% $ (33) Commercial 3 % 9 (2)% (4) Industrial 3 % 3 6 % 3 Other 1 % - 1 % - Total retail 6 % 42 (4)% (34) Sales for resale: Bulk power sales 27 % 13 51 % 12 Other 5 % - (6)% - Total operating revenues $ 55 $ (22)
Although 1993 temperatures have been milder than normal, residential and commercial sales reflect closer to normal temperatures during 1993 compared to the abnormally mild weather of 1992 and warmer than normal weather of 1991. Based on the Company's records of cooling degree days above 65 degrees Fahrenheit, the summer of 1992 was the coolest since 1950. The weather conditions were the primary cause for the variances in residential and commercial sales although both 1993 and 1992 also reflect load growth. Industrial kwh sales continued to increase over prior years and reflect increased large customer usage in the steel, auto manufacturing, grain processing and plastic container production sectors.
Bulk power sales reflect an increase in the number of sales commitments, the Company's high unit and fuel availability, and the requirements of other electric systems.
Changes in total revenue per kwh are due to changes in the mix of kwh sales among customer classifications and the effect on certain classifications of declining price per kwh as kwh usage increases. Less than 1% of the Company's revenues are affected by an automatic fuel adjustment provision.
Tariffs have not changed materially since 1988. Effective January 1, 1994, Missouri jurisdictional retail rates were reduced 2.66%, or approximately $12.5 million annually, primarily to reflect the end of the Missouri Public Service Commission (MPSC) rate phase-in amortization. This agreement with the MPSC and public counsel also includes a provision whereby none of the parties can file for a general increase or decrease in Missouri retail electric rates prior to January 1, 1996. Approximately two-thirds of total retail sales are from Missouri customers.
The level of future kwh sales will depend upon weather conditions, customer conservation efforts, competing fuel sources and the overall economy of the Company's service territory. Sales to industrial customers, such as steel and auto manufacturers, are also affected by the national economy. The level of bulk power sales in the future will depend upon the availability of generating units, fuel costs, requirements of other electric systems and the Company's system requirements.
Also, issues facing the electric utility industry such as transmission access, demand-side management programs, increased competition and retention of large industrial customers could affect sales. Alternative sources of electricity, such as cogeneration, could affect the retention of, and future sales to large industrial customers.
COMPETITION
The National Energy Policy Act of 1992 gave the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) the authority to require electric utilities to provide wholesale transmission line access (wholesale wheeling) to independent power producers and other utilities. Amendments to the Public Utility Holding Company Act simplified the organization of exempt wholesale generators, who engage exclusively in generating electricity for wholesale markets. Although the Act prohibits FERC from ordering retail wheeling (allowing retail customers to select a different power producer and use the transmission facilities of the host utility to deliver the energy), the Act itself does not prevent the state commissions from doing so. The state commissions however, may be preempted by other provisions of the Federal Power Act. If retail wheeling were allowed, utilities with large industrial customers could face intense competition and potentially lose a major customer which could place an unfair, costly burden on the remaining customer base or shareholders.
The Company continues to evaluate the effects of competition on its operations and position itself for a more competitive marketplace. It has been participating in wholesale wheeling voluntarily and has tariffs in place to accommodate these activities. The Company has a diverse customer mix with less than 18% of total sales derived from industrial customers as compared to a utility average of approximately 35%. The Company's industrial rates are competitively priced compared to the regional average and its rate structure allows some flexibility in setting
rates. In addition, Company sponsored programs help customers manage their electricity consumption, and control their costs.
FUEL, PURCHASED POWER, OTHER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE EXPENSES
Wolf Creek completed its sixth scheduled refueling outage during 1993 and returned on-line after 73 days. The Company began accruing for this outage in January 1992 (see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the 1992 change in accounting principle). The prior refueling outage began in 1991, before the Company started accruing for these costs, and extended into January 1992. Because these costs, as well as a forced outage in 1992, had not been accrued, all expenses associated with these outages were expensed as incurred. As a result, 1992 expenses associated with Wolf Creek outages (including amounts accrued beginning in January 1992) exceeded amounts expensed in 1993 by $5.6 million ($0.06 per share) and 1992 expenses were less than 1991 expenses by $4.6 million ($0.05 per share). The next refueling outage is scheduled to begin in September 1994.
Combined fuel and purchased power expenses for 1993 increased over 1992 and 1991 reflecting additional sales. Partially offsetting these increases, fuel prices and freight rates have gradually decreased since 1991.
Other operation expenses increased during 1993 and 1992 reflecting increased generating plant production expenses and higher levels of administrative and general expenses mostly due to increased wages and employee benefits, and the 1993 accrual of postretirement benefits (see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
The Company continues to place emphasis on cost control. Processes are being reviewed and changed to provide increased efficiencies and improved operations.
INCOME TAXES
The change in income tax expense is mostly due to the changes in income subject to tax, but 1993 also reflects an increase of approximately $2 million in federal income tax expense because federal income tax rates increased.
GENERAL TAXES
Components of general taxes (in thousands):
Increases in property taxes since 1991 are primarily due to the Kansas school finance legislation. The Company estimates the effects of this legislation will increase future property taxes over 1993 levels by approximately $1 million.
The majority of Missouri customers are billed gross receipts tax based on billed revenues.
OTHER INCOME AND DEDUCTIONS
Miscellaneous and Income Taxes - 1992 reflects gains from the sale of property and other contract settlements.
INTEREST CHARGES
Declines in long-term interest expense since 1991 reflect lower interest rates on variable rate debt and the retirement, repayment or refinancing of debt. The average interest rate paid on long-term debt including current maturities declined to 6.0% in 1993 compared to 6.6% in 1992 and 7.5% in 1991.
Declines in short-term interest expense reflect the decreasing interest rates since 1991 and a lower level of short-term debt outstanding during 1993. The average daily outstanding balance of short-term debt decreased to $16 million in 1993 from $60 million in 1992 and $50 million in 1991.
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS
The 1992 decrease in the preferred stock dividend requirements compared to 1991 reflects the refinancing of higher rate preferred stock with variable rate preferred stock.
EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS)
EPS for 1993 increased $0.31 over 1992 and EPS for 1992 decreased $0.23 from 1991.
The effects of weather increased 1993 EPS by approximately $0.25 over 1992 and decreased 1992 EPS by approximately $0.46 from 1991. Temperatures in 1993 were milder than normal, but closer to normal compared to the extremely mild weather in 1992 and warmer than normal weather of 1991. Based on a statistical relationship between sales and the differences in actual and normal temperatures for the year, the Company estimates the effects of abnormal weather for the last three years were as follows:
1993 1992 1991 Estimated effects of abnormal weather on EPS $ (0.10) $ (0.35) $ 0.11
In addition to the effects of abnormal weather on EPS, 1993 expenses associated with Wolf Creek outages (including outage accruals which began in January 1992) decreased from 1992 resulting in an increase in EPS of $0.06. These same 1992 expenses decreased from 1991 causing an increase in 1992 EPS of $0.05.
EPS for 1993 and 1992 reflect efforts of the Company to control costs despite increases in production expenses and general and administrative expenses. Also, since 1991, the Company has refinanced a significant portion of its long-term debt and preferred stock to take advantage of lower rates. EPS for 1992 also reflect gains from the sales of property and other contract settlements.
PROJECTED CONSTRUCTION EXPENDITURES
Construction expenditures, excluding AFDC, were $129.2 million in 1993 and are projected for the next five years as follows:
The Company's resource plan includes four new 146 megawatt (mw) gas- fired combustion turbines scheduled to be completed from 1998 through 2000. In addition, the plan envisions a new 705 mw (250 mw, Company's share) coal- fired generating unit scheduled to begin construction in 1997 and be completed by 2002. The projected construction expenditures include $200.2 million of forecasted costs for these projects during the next five years. The Company's resource plan is subject to periodic review and modification. The next integrated resource plan will be submitted to the MPSC in July 1994.
WOLF CREEK
Wolf Creek is one of the Company's principal generating facilities representing approximately 17% of the Company's accredited generating capacity and 26% of the Company's annual kwh generation during the last three years, and has the lowest fuel cost of any of its generating facilities. The plant operated at 80%, 85% and 59% of capacity for 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. Wolf Creek's assets and operating expenses represent approximately 50% and 20% of the Company's total assets and operating expenses, respectively. Currently no major equipment replacements are anticipated and the Company estimates the cost of nuclear fuel per million BTU, after the next refueling in the fall of 1994, will increase from approximately 35% to 40% of the cost of coal. Based on contract prices and projected future spot market prices for nuclear fuel and coal, it is anticipated that by 1996 the cost of nuclear fuel will increase in relation to coal to be about one-half the cost of coal.
An extended shut-down of the unit could have a substantial adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Higher replacement power and other costs would be incurred as a result. Although not expected, an abnormal shut-down of the plant could be caused by adverse incidents at the plant or by actions of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission reacting to safety concerns at the plant or other similar nuclear facilities. If a long-term shut-down occurred, the state regulatory commissions could consider reducing rates by excluding Wolf Creek investment from rate base.
Ownership and operation of a nuclear generating unit exposes the Company to potential retroactive assessments and property losses in excess of insurance coverage. These risks are more fully discussed in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements-Commitments and Contingencies-Nuclear Liability and Insurance.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
The Company's policy is to act in an environmentally responsible manner and utilize the latest technological processes possible to avoid and treat contamination. The Company continually conducts environmental audits designed to assure compliance with governmental regulations and detect contamination. However, these regulations are constantly evolving; governmental bodies may impose additional or more rigid environmental regulations which could require substantial changes to the Company's operations or facilities.
See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements-Commitments and Contingencies-Environmental Matters-for discussion of costs of compliance with environmental laws and regulations and a potential liability (which the Company believes is not material to its financial condition or results of operations) for cleanup costs under the Federal Superfund law.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 contain two programs significantly affecting the utility industry. Based on the results of current studies, the Company estimates total capital expenditures needed to comply with existing and proposed acid rain program regulations will be $4.1 million for the installation of continuous emission monitoring equipment. The Company has spent $2.9 million as of December 31, 1993 and has included the remaining $1.2 million in the five year projected construction expenditures. Future acid rain program regulations may require the Company to make further capital expenditures, but it is not possible to estimate those expenditures, if any. The other utility-related program calls for a study of certain air toxic substances. Based on the outcome of this study, regulation of air toxic substances, including mercury, could be required. The Company cannot, at this time, predict the likelihood of any such regulations or compliance costs.
CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS AND LIQUIDITY
On January 3, 1994, Moody's Investors Service upgraded the credit rating of the Company's bonds due to an improved financial profile and low-cost operations. The Company's long-term debt was upgraded as follows: secured pollution control bonds to A1 from A2; general mortgage bonds-medium-term notes to A1 from A3; unsecured pollution control bonds to A2 from Baa1; and, preferred stock to a2 from a3. In addition, in 1993 Standard & Poor's Corporation and Duff & Phelps upgraded the Company's General Mortgage Bonds as follows: Standard & Poor's from A- to A; and Duff & Phelps from A to A+. Improved ratings will make it less costly for the Company to raise funds when needed and will contribute to the Company's continued efforts to meet the challenge of increased competition in the utility industry.
The Company's capital structure at December 31, 1993 (including current maturities of long-term debt less special deposit for retirement of debt) consisted of 49.1% common stock equity, 5.1% preferred stock and 45.8% long- term debt. The Company's goal is to maintain a capital structure in which the percentages of common stock equity and long-term debt are approximately equal.
The Company currently estimates that it will be able to meet a significant portion of the projected construction expenditures with internally-generated funds. It is anticipated that funds for maturing debt through 1998 totaling $274.5 million will be provided from operations, refinancings or short-term debt. As of December 31, 1993, the Company had $78 million of registered but unissued Medium-Term Notes and $149 million of unused bank lines of credit. Uncertainties which affect the
degree to which these capital requirements will be met with funds provided from operations include such items as the effect of inflation on operating expenses, the level of kwh sales, regulatory actions, compliance with future environmental regulations, availability of the Company's generating units and the level of bulk power sales with other utilities.
The Company currently uses an accelerated depreciation method for tax purposes. The accelerated depreciation on the Wolf Creek plant has reduced the Company's tax payments during the last three years by approximately $30 million per year. Accelerated depreciation on Wolf Creek ends in 1994.
See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements-Commitments and Contingencies-Tax Matters-for discussion of the Company's federal income tax returns for the years 1985 through 1990 which are presently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service.
In order to take advantage of the potential benefits inherent in a larger energy system, the Company might incur additional debt and/or issue additional equity to finance system growth or new growth opportunities, through business combinations or other investments such as an exempt wholesale generator.
SUBSEQUENT EVENT
The Company announced an early retirement program in March 1994. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of the expense and savings of the program.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31 December 31 1993 1992 ASSETS (Thousands)
UTILITY PLANT, at original cost (Notes 1, 8 and 9) Electric $ 3,240,384 $ 3,133,059 Less-Accumulated depreciation 1,019,714 948,266 Net utility plant in service 2,220,670 2,184,793 Construction work in progress 67,766 65,965 Nuclear fuel, net of amortization of $76,722,000 and $78,735,000 29,862 34,210 Total 2,318,298 2,284,968
REGULATORY ASSET - DEFERRED WOLF CREEK COSTS (Note 1) 29,118 39,484
REGULATORY ASSET - RECOVERABLE TAXES (Note 1) 122,000 94,000
INVESTMENTS AND NONUTILITY PROPERTY 28,454 27,570
CURRENT ASSETS Cash 1,539 128 Special deposit for the retirement of debt (Note 8) 60,118 - Receivables Customer accounts receivable (Note 5) 29,320 14,372 Other receivables 19,340 24,043 Fuel inventories, at average cost 14,550 20,625 Materials and supplies, at average cost 44,157 45,263 Prepayments 4,686 4,209 Deferred income taxes (Note 3) 3,648 5,553 Total 177,358 114,193
DEFERRED CHARGES Regulatory Assets (Note 1) Settlement of fuel contracts 20,634 25,751 KCC Wolf Creek carrying costs 9,575 12,311 MPSC rate phase-in plan - 7,072 Other 31,899 26,798 Other deferred charges 17,732 14,776 Total 79,840 86,708
Total $ 2,755,068 $ 2,646,923
LIABILITIES
CAPITALIZATION (Notes 7 and 8)(See Statements) Common stock-authorized 150,000,000 shares without par value-61,908,726 shares issued and outstanding-stated value $ 449,697 $ 449,697 Retained earnings 418,201 405,985 Capital stock premium and expense (1,747) (1,758) Common stock equity 866,151 853,924 Cumulative preferred stock 89,000 89,000 Cumulative preferred stock (redeemable) 1,756 1,916 Long-term debt 733,664 788,209 Total 1,690,571 1,733,049
CURRENT LIABILITIES Notes payable to banks (Note 6) 4,000 - Commercial paper (Note 6) 25,000 33,000 Current maturities of long-term debt 134,488 26,500 Accounts payable 59,421 77,162 Dividends declared 423 423 Accrued taxes 27,800 19,864 Accrued interest 15,575 12,949 Accrued payroll and vacations 20,127 18,044 Accrued refueling outage costs (Note 1) 7,262 12,600 Other 8,531 7,631 Total 302,627 208,173
DEFERRED CREDITS AND OTHER LIABILITIES Deferred income taxes (Note 3) 627,819 576,222 Deferred investment tax credits 87,185 91,530 Other 46,866 37,949 Total 761,870 705,701
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 4)
Total $ 2,755,068 $ 2,646,923
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Year Ended December 31
1993 1992 1991 (Thousands)
ELECTRIC OPERATING REVENUES $ 857,450 $ 802,668 $ 825,101
OPERATING EXPENSES Operation Fuel 130,117 130,032 132,100 Purchased power 31,403 21,868 22,226 Other 184,633 175,937 162,548 Maintenance 78,550 81,163 80,922 Depreciation 91,110 88,768 86,795 Taxes Income (Note 3) 69,502 51,691 61,871 General 95,659 92,461 88,525 Amortization of MPSC rate phase-in plan (Note 1) 7,072 7,072 7,072 Deferred Wolf Creek costs (Note 1) 13,102 13,102 11,734 Total 701,148 662,094 653,793
OPERATING INCOME 156,302 140,574 171,308
OTHER INCOME AND DEDUCTIONS Allowance for equity funds used during construction 2,846 1,073 539 Deferred Wolf Creek carrying costs (Note 1) - - 791 Miscellaneous (2,486) 2,595 (3,829) Income taxes (Note 3) 1,549 (505) 1,593 Total 1,909 3,163 (906)
INCOME BEFORE INTEREST CHARGES 158,211 143,737 170,402
INTEREST CHARGES Long-term debt 50,118 54,266 63,057 Short-term notes 750 2,749 3,299 Miscellaneous 4,113 2,173 2,665 Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (2,542) (1,785) (2,512) Total 52,439 57,403 66,509
YEARLY RESULTS Net income 105,772 86,334 103,893 Preferred stock dividend requirements 3,153 3,062 6,023 Earnings available for common stock $ 102,619 $ 83,272 $ 97,870
Average number of common shares outstanding 61,908,726 61,908,726 61,908,726 Earnings per common share $ 1.66 $ 1.35 $ 1.58 Cash dividends per common share $ 1.46 $ 1.43 $ 1.37
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31
1993 1992 1991 (Thousands) CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net income $ 105,772 $ 86,334 $ 103,893 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation 91,110 88,768 86,795 Amortization of: Nuclear Fuel 8,705 9,583 6,199 Deferred Wolf Creek costs 13,102 13,102 10,943 MPSC rate phase-in plan 7,072 7,072 7,072 Other 8,234 5,921 5,147 Deferred income taxes (net) 25,502 23,979 28,064 Investment tax credit (net) (4,345) (4,521) (7,009) Allowance for equity funds used during construction (2,846) (1,073) (539) Cash flows affected by changes in: Receivables (10,245) 2,848 13,636 Fuel inventories 6,075 (859) 137 Materials and supplies 1,106 654 (98) Accounts payable (17,741) 4,838 2,861 Accrued taxes 7,936 2,404 2,995 Accrued interest 2,626 488 (1,244) Wolf Creek refueling outage accrual (5,338) 12,600 - Settlement of fuel contracts - - (8,578) Other operating activities 6,419 1,599 2,175 Net cash provided by operating activities 243,144 253,737 252,449
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Construction expenditures (129,199) (129,559) (122,447) Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (2,542) (1,785) (2,512) Other investing activities 306 (4,589) (5,404) Net cash used in investing activities (131,435) (135,933) (130,363)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Issuance of long-term debt 324,846 134,750 135,250 Issuance of preferred stock - 50,000 - Retirement of long-term debt (271,480) (143,230) (163,215) Retirement of preferred stock - (13,000) (40,000) Special deposit for the retirement of debt (60,118) - - Premium on reacquired stock and long-term debt (4,077) (2,321) (5,516) Increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings (4,000) (53,000) 42,500 Dividends declared (93,556) (91,277) (90,232) Other financing activities (1,913) 274 (879) Net cash used in financing activities (110,298) (117,804) (122,092)
Net increase (decrease) in cash 1,411 - (6) Cash at beginning of year 128 128 134 Cash at end of year $ 1,539 $ 128 $ 128
Cash paid during the year for: Interest (net of amount capitalized) $ 47,361 $ 55,223 $ 66,290 Income taxes $ 40,141 $ 32,995 $ 37,117
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CUMULATIVE PREFERRED STOCK AND LONG-TERM DEBT
December 31 1993 1992 CUMMULATIVE PREFERRED STOCK (Note 7) (in thousands) $100 Par Value 3.80% - 100,000 shares issued $ 10,000 $ 10,000 4.50% - 100,000 shares issued 10,000 10,000 4.20% - 70,000 shares issued 7,000 7,000 4.35% - 120,000 shares issued 12,000 12,000 No Par Value 3.04%* - 500,000 shares issued 50,000 50,000 Total $ 89,000 $ 89,000
CUMMULATIVE PREFERRED STOCK (REDEEMABLE) (Note 7) $100 Par Value 4.00% - 17,557 and 19,157 shares issued $ 1,756 $ 1,916
LONG-TERM DEBT (EXCLUDING CURRENT MATURITIES) (Note 8) First Mortgage Bonds 7.33% weighted average rate, amounts redeemed in 1993 $ - $ 244,980 9.46% series due 1994 - 60,000 5 7/8% series due 2007 21,940 21,940 Secured by General Mortgage Bonds Medium-Term Notes due 1994-2008, 6.78% and 7.29% weighted average rate at December 31 378,750 220,000 3.34%* Environmental Improvement Revenue Refunding Bonds due 2012-23 122,846 31,000 Guaranty of Pollution Control Bonds 5 3/4% series due 2003 13,742 13,980 3.15%* due 2015-17 196,500 196,500 Unamortized Premium and Discount (net) (114) (191) Total $ 733,664 $ 788,209
* Variable rate securities, weighted average rate as of December 31, 1993
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF RETAINED EARNINGS Year ended December 31 1993 1992 1991 (in thousands) Beginning Balance $ 405,985 $ 411,161 $ 399,294 Net Income 105,772 86,334 103,893
511,757 497,495 503,187 Premium on Reacquired Preferred Stock - 233 1,794 Dividends Declared: Preferred Stock, at required rates 3,169 2,747 5,417 Common Stock - $1.46, $1.43 and $1.37 per share 90,387 88,530 84,815 Ending Balance (Note 7) $ 418,201 $ 405,985 $ 411,161
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
System of Accounts
The accounting records of Kansas City Power & Light Company (the Company) are maintained in accordance with the Uniform System of Accounts prescribed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and generally accepted accounting principles.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and KLT Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Because KLT Inc. is not an electric utility, its revenues and expenses have been classified under Other Income and Deductions in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
KLT Inc. was formed in 1992 as a holding company for various non- regulated business opportunities. The Company's equity investment in KLT Inc. was $4.5 million and $1.5 million as of December 31, 1993 and 1992, respectively.
Utility Plant
Utility plant is stated at historical costs of construction. These costs include taxes, payroll-related costs, including pensions and other fringe benefits, and an allowance for funds used during construction.
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (AFDC)
AFDC represents the cost of borrowed funds and a return on equity funds used to finance construction projects and is capitalized as a cost of construction work in progress. The portion attributable to borrowed funds is reflected as a reduction of interest charges while the portion applicable to equity funds is shown as a non-cash item of other income. When a construction project is placed in service, the related AFDC, as well as other construction costs, is used to establish rates under regulatory rate practices. The rates used to compute gross AFDC are compounded semi-annually and averaged 8.3% for 1993, 6.6% for 1992 and 7.7% for 1991.
Depreciation and Maintenance
Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis for jurisdictional property based on depreciation rates approved by the Missouri Public Service Commission (MPSC) and the Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC). Annual composite rates were approximately 2.9% during the last three years.
Costs of improvements to units of property are charged to the utility plant accounts. Property units retired or otherwise disposed are charged to accumulated depreciation, along with removal costs, net of salvage. Repairs of property and replacements of items determined not to be units of property are expensed as incurred.
Nuclear Plant Decommissioning Costs
In 1986, the MPSC estimated the cost of decommissioning the Wolf Creek Generating Station (Wolf Creek) to be $103 million in 1985 dollars. In 1989, the KCC estimated the cost to be $206 million in 1988 dollars. Then, in 1992, the MPSC increased its estimate to $347 million in 1990 dollars. In accordance with MPSC and KCC requirements, the jurisdictional portions of the Company's 47% share of these costs (current level of $3.2 million, annually) are being recovered and charged to other operation expenses over the life of the plant and placed in an external trust fund to be used only for the physical decommissioning of Wolf Creek (immediate dismantlement method) which is not expected to occur prior to 2025. A study was filed with the KCC and MPSC during 1993 estimating the projected decommissioning costs to be $370 million in 1993 dollars. Based on this study, it is expected that the MPSC will determine that no increase in the current level of the Missouri jurisdictional funding and expenses will be necessary. A hearing before the KCC is expected during 1994.
The investment in the trust fund, including reinvested earnings, was $14.3 million and $10.6 million at December 31, 1993 and 1992, respectively. These amounts are reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets under Investments and Nonutility Property with the related liabilities for decommissioning included in Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities-Other.
Nuclear Fuel
The cost of nuclear fuel is amortized to fuel expense based on the quantity of heat produced for the generation of electricity. Under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, the Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for the permanent disposal of spent nuclear fuel. Currently, the Company pays a quarterly fee of one mill per kilowatt-hour of net nuclear generation to the DOE for future permanent disposal services. Disposal costs are charged to fuel expense and recovered through rates. These disposal services may not be available prior to 2013 although an interim facility may be available earlier. Wolf Creek has an on-site, temporary storage facility for spent nuclear fuel which, under current regulatory guidelines, can provide storage space until approximately 2006. The Company believes additional temporary storage space can be constructed or obtained, as necessary.
Regulatory Assets
Certain costs are recorded as regulatory assets when a rate order allows the deferral and inclusion of the amortization in rates or when it is probable, based on historical regulatory precedent, that future rates established by the regulators will recover amortization of the costs. If subsequent recovery is not permitted, any unamortized balance, net of tax, would reduce net income.
Deferred Wolf Creek Costs
Orders from the KCC and MPSC provided for continued construction accounting for ratemaking purposes after the September 3, 1985 commercial in-service date of Wolf Creek through September 30, 1985 and May 5, 1986, respectively. The deferral of certain other carrying costs was also authorized. These deferrals are being amortized and recovered in rates over an approximate 10 year period ending in 1996.
Recoverable Taxes
See Income Taxes below for discussion.
Settlement Of Fuel Contracts
The Company has deferred the cost incurred to terminate certain coal purchase contracts. These costs are being amortized through the year 2002.
KCC Wolf Creek Carrying Costs
As ordered by the KCC, the Company deferred certain carrying costs through June 1991. The recovery and corresponding amortization of this deferral over six years began in July 1991.
MPSC Rate Phase-In Plan
MPSC's 1986 Wolf Creek rate phase-in plan resulted in the deferral of a cash recovery of a portion of the cost of equity and the carrying costs on the deferral. Recovery of these deferrals was completed December 31, 1993.
Effective January 1, 1994, the MPSC approved a 2.66% rate reduction (approximately $12.5 million annually) for the Company's Missouri retail customers primarily to reflect the completion of this amortization. The reduction will be spread evenly over the Missouri retail customer classes. This agreement with the MPSC and public counsel also includes a provision whereby none of the parties can file for a general increase or decrease in Missouri retail electric rates prior to January 1, 1996. Approximately two-thirds of total retail sales are from Missouri customers.
Other
Other regulatory assets include premium on redeemed debt, deferred flood costs, the deferral of costs to decommission and decontaminate federal uranium enrichment facilities and other costs. These deferrals are amortized over various periods extending to 2017.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The stated values of the Company's financial instruments as of December 31, 1993 and 1992 approximated the fair market values based on quoted market prices for the securities or for similar types of securities. If quotes were not available, the Company's incremental borrowing rate for similar types of debt was used.
Revenue Recognition
The Company utilizes cycle billing and accrues an estimated amount for unbilled revenue at the end of each reporting period.
Income Taxes
The Company has adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This statement is not materially different from FASB Statement No. 96, which the Company adopted in 1988. As a result, the Company establishes deferred tax liabilities and assets, as appropriate, for all temporary differences caused when the tax basis of an asset or liability differs from that reported in the financial statements. These deferred tax assets and liabilities must be determined using the tax rates scheduled by the tax law to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse.
The Regulatory Asset-Recoverable Taxes primarily reflects the future revenue requirements necessary to recover the tax benefits of existing temporary differences flowed through to ratepayers in the past. During 1993, the net change in the Regulatory Asset-Recoverable Taxes and Deferred income taxes included a $40 million increase resulting from the changes in the federal and Missouri state income tax laws effective January 1, 1993 and January 1, 1994, respectively. Although the Company has calculated its deferred tax assets and liabilities pursuant to FASB 109, operating income taxes were recorded in accordance with ratemaking principles. However, if FASB 109 were reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income, net income would remain the same.
Investment tax credits have been deferred when utilized and are amortized to income over the remaining service lives of the related properties.
Accrued Refueling Outage Costs - Change In Accounting Principle
Effective January 1992, the Company changed its method of accounting for incremental costs to be incurred during scheduled Wolf Creek refueling outages. Instead of expensing these costs as incurred, the Company is accruing forecasted outage costs evenly (monthly) over the unit's operating cycle which normally lasts approximately 18 months. The Company believes this method of accounting produces a more meaningful presentation of yearly results of operations than the prior method. Since the accrual began in January 1992, when Wolf Creek returned on-line from a refueling outage, there was no cumulative effect for the change in accounting principle. The pro forma effects for the year ended December 31, 1991 were not material but would have increased net income by $3.2 million ($0.05 per share). Because there was no refueling outage in 1992, the effect of this change decreased 1992 net income by $7.8 million ($0.13 per share).
Environmental Matters
The Company's policy is to accrue environmental and cleanup costs when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. The Company believes it has appropriately recorded all such costs related to environmental matters.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to previously issued financial statements in order to conform with the 1993 presentation.
2. PENSION PLANS AND OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Pension Plans
The Company has defined benefit pension plans for all its regular employees, including officers, providing for benefits upon retirement, normally at age 65. In accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), the Company has satisfied at least its minimum funding requirements. Benefits under these plans reflect the employee's compensation, years of service and age at retirement.
Provisions for pensions are determined under the rules prescribed by FASB Statement No. 87-Employers' Accounting for Pensions. The following is the funded status of the plans:
Components of provisions for pensions (in thousands):
Long-term rates of return on plan assets of 8% to 8.5% were used.
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
In addition to providing pension benefits, the Company provides certain postretirement health care and life insurance benefits for substantially all retired employees.
During the first quarter of 1993 the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 106-Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions. FASB 106 requires companies to accrue the cost of postretirement health care and life insurance benefits during an employee's active years of service. Previously, the Company expensed these costs as paid (pay-as-you-go). The Company currently recovers these costs through rates on a pay-as-you-go basis. As of December 31, 1992, the transition obligation under FASB 106 was approximately $23.5 million, with amortization over 20 years beginning in 1993.
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost (in thousands): Service cost for benefits earned during the year $ 616 Interest cost on the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO) 1,893 Amortization of unrecognized transition obligation 1,175 Net periodic postretirement cost 3,684 Less: Pay-as-you-go costs 1,109 Net increase in cost due to FASB 106 $ 2,575
The increase in the annual health care cost trend rate for 1994 is assumed to be 13%, decreasing gradually over a seven year period to its ultimate level of 6%. The Company's health care plan requires retirees to participate in the cost when premiums exceed a certain amount. Because of this provision, an increase in the assumed health care cost trend rate by 1% in each year would only increase the APBO as of December 31, 1993 by approximately $786,000 and the aggregate service and interest cost components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for 1993 by approximately $98,000.
Reconciliation of the status of postretirement benefit plans to amounts recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands):
December 31 APBO: Retirees $ (10,672) Fully eligible active plan participants (6,405) Other active plan participants (10,501) Unfunded APBO (27,578) Unrecognized loss 2,689 Unrecognized transition obligation 22,314 Accrued postretirement benefit obligation (included in Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities - Other) $ (2,575)
The weighted average discount rate of 7% and future salary level increases of 4% were used to determine the APBO.
Long-Term Incentive Plan
In 1992, the shareholders adopted a 10 year, Long-Term Incentive Plan for officers and key employees. Awards issued under the Plan cannot exceed three million common stock shares. During 1993 and 1992, awards to purchase 63,125 and 86,000 shares of common stock were granted with exercise prices of $23.875 and $21.625 per share, respectively. During 1993, awards to purchase 4,000 shares were canceled. Under granted stock options, recipients are entitled to receive accumulated dividends as though reinvested if the options are exercised and if the market price at the time of exercise equals or exceeds the grant price. Under the assumption that all shares will eventually be exercised, the Company expensed $0.1 million and $0.2 million in 1993 and 1992, respectively, representing accumulated dividends and the change in stock price since the date of grant. At December 31, 1993, options for 145,125 shares of common stock were outstanding and options for 41,000 shares were exercisable.
3. INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense as shown in the Consolidated Statements of Income consists of the following:
The following table shows a reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective rate reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the Company's income tax policies.
1993 1992 1991
Federal statutory income tax rate 35.0 % 34.0 % 34.0 % Differences between book and tax depreciation not normalized 1.3 1.7 1.8 Amortization of investment tax credit (2.5) (3.3) (4.3) State income taxes 3.3 3.9 4.0 Other 2.0 1.4 1.2 Effective income tax rate 39.1 % 37.7 % 36.7 %
The significant temporary differences resulting in deferred tax assets and liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows: December 31 1993 1992
(thousands)
Depreciation differences $ 476,637 $ 449,701 Recoverable taxes 122,000 94,000 Other 25,534 26,968 Net deferred income tax liability $ 624,171 $ 570,669
The net deferred income tax liability consists of the following: December 31 1993 1992 (thousands)
Gross deferred income tax assets $ (63,187) $ (64,746) Gross deferred income tax liabilities 687,358 635,415 Net deferred income tax liability $ 624,171 $ 570,669
4. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Nuclear Liability and Insurance
The Price-Anderson Act currently limits the public liability of nuclear reactor owners to $9.4 billion, including attorney costs, for claims that could arise from a nuclear incident. Accordingly, the Company and the other owners of Wolf Creek have liability insurance coverage of this amount which consists of the maximum available commercial insurance of $200 million and Secondary Financial Protection (SFP). SFP coverage is funded by a mandatory program of deferred premiums assessed against all owners of licensed reactors for any nuclear incident anywhere in the country. The maximum assessment per reactor is $79.3 million ($37.3 million, Company's share) per incident. The owners of Wolf Creek are jointly and severally liable for these charges, payable at a rate not to exceed $10 million ($4.7 million, Company's share) per incident per year.
The owners of Wolf Creek also have $2.8 billion of property damage, decontamination and decommissioning insurance for loss resulting from damage to the Wolf Creek facilities. Nuclear insurance pools provide $1.3 billion of coverage, while Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (NEIL) provides $1.5 billion. In the event of an accident, insurance proceeds must first be used for reactor stabilization and site decontamination. The remaining proceeds from the $2.8 billion insurance coverage ($1.3 billion, Company's share), if any, can be used for property damage up to $1.1 billion (Company's share), premature decommissioning costs up to $117.5 million (Company's share) in excess of funds previously collected for decommissioning (as discussed in Note 1) with the remaining $47 million (Company's share) available for either property damage or premature decommissioning costs.
The owners of Wolf Creek have also procured extra expense insurance from NEIL. Under both the NEIL property and extra expense policies, the Company is subject to retroactive assessment if NEIL losses, with respect to each policy year, exceed the accumulated funds available to the insurer under that policy. The estimated maximum retroactive assessments for the Company's share under the policies total approximately $9 million per year.
In the event of a catastrophic loss at Wolf Creek, the amount of insurance available may not be adequate to cover property damages and extra expenses incurred. Uninsured losses, to the extent not recovered through rates, would be assumed by the Company and could have a material, adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.
Nuclear Fuel Commitments
At December 31, 1993, Wolf Creek's nuclear fuel commitments (Company's share) were approximately $16 million for uranium concentrates through 1997, $126 million for enrichment through 2014 and $46 million for fabrication through 2014.
Tax Matters
The Company's federal income tax returns for the years 1985 through 1990 are presently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The IRS has issued Revenue Agent's Reports for the years 1985 through 1990. The Reports include proposed adjustments that would reduce the Company's Wolf Creek investment tax credit (ITC) by 25% or approximately $20 million and tax depreciation by 23% or approximately $190 million. These amounts include the continuing effect of the adjustments through December 31, 1993. These adjustments, principally, are based upon the IRS's contention that (i) certain start-up and testing costs considered by the Company to be costs of the plant, should be treated as licensing costs, which do not qualify for ITC or accelerated depreciation, and (ii) certain cooling and generating facilities should not qualify for ITC or accelerated depreciation.
If the IRS were to prevail on all of these proposed adjustments, the Company would be obligated to make cash payments, calculated through December 31, 1993, of approximately $95 million for additional federal and state income taxes and $50 million for corresponding interest. After offsets for deferred income taxes, these payments would reduce net income by approximately $30 million.
The Company has filed a protest with the appeals division of the IRS. Based upon their interpretation of applicable tax principles and the tax treatment of similar costs and facilities with respect to other plants, it is the opinion of management and outside tax counsel that the IRS's proposed Wolf Creek adjustments are substantially overstated. Management believes any additional taxes, together with interest, resulting from the final resolution of these matters will not be material to the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
Environmental Matters
The Company's operations must comply with federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. The generation of electricity utilizes, produces and requires disposal of certain products and by-products including polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB's), asbestos and other potentially hazardous materials. The Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, the "Superfund" law, imposes strict joint and several liability for those who generate, transport or
deposit hazardous waste as well as the current property owner and predecessor owner at the time of contamination. The Company continually conducts environmental audits designed to detect contamination and assure compliance with governmental regulations. However, compliance programs necessary to meet future environmental laws and regulations governing water and air quality, including carbon dioxide emissions, hazardous waste handling and disposal, toxic substances and the effects of electromagnetic fields, could require substantial changes to the Company's operations or facilities.
Interstate Power Company of Dubuque, Iowa (Interstate) filed a lawsuit in 1989 against the Company in the Federal District Court for the District of Iowa seeking from the Company contribution and indemnity under the Superfund law for cleanup costs of hazardous substances at the site of a demolished gas manufacturing plant in Mason City, Iowa. The plant was operated by the Company for very brief periods of time before the plant was demolished in 1952. The site and all other properties the Company owned in Iowa were sold to Interstate in 1957. The Company estimates that the cleanup could cost up to $10 million. The Company's estimate is based upon an evaluation of available information from on-going site investigation and assessment activities, including the costs of such activities.
In August 1993, the Company, along with other parties to the lawsuit, received a letter from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) notifying each such party that it was considered a potentially responsible party for cleanup costs at the site. The EPA has also proposed to list the site on the National Priorities List.
The Company believes it has several valid defenses to this action including the fact that the 1957 sales documents included clauses which require Interstate to indemnify the Company from and against all claims and damages arising after the sale. However, the Court in an October 1993 order rejected this position, ruling that the indemnity clauses were not sufficiently broad to indemnify for environmental cleanup. This order will be final for appeal after a trial to allocate the cleanup costs among the parties, which is expected in 1994. Even if unsuccessful on the liability issue, the Company does not believe its allocated share of the cleanup costs will be material to its financial condition or results of operations.
Other Agreements
Under long-term contractual arrangements, the Company's share of purchased coal totaled approximately $17 million in 1993 and $21 million in 1992 and 1991. The Company's share of purchase commitments in 1993 dollars under the remaining terms of the coal contracts is approximately $110 million. The Company also purchases coal on the spot market.
The Company has a transmission line lease with another utility whereby, with FERC approval, the rental payments can be increased by the lessor, after which the Company is entitled to cancel the lease if able to secure an alternative transmission path. Total commitments under this lease are $1.9 million per year and approximately $60 million over the remaining life of the lease if the lease is not canceled.
Under other leases, the Company incurred rental expense during the last three years of approximately $15 million to $19 million per year. Rental commitments under these leases for railroad cars, computer equipment, buildings, a transmission line and similar items are approximately $114 million over the remaining life of the leases with payments during each of the next five years ranging from a high of $17 million in 1994 to $8 million in 1998. Capital leases are not material to the Company and are included in the amounts discussed above.
The Company has contracted to purchase capacity from other utilities through 2009. The obligations are as follows (cost in millions):
Cost Megawatts (mw) 1994 $12.4 470 1995 15.1 450 1996 19.4 500 1997 22.8 500 1998 22.8 500 1999 22.8 500 2000 16.6 150
Thereafter - annual amounts through 2009 10.4 150
5. SALE OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
In 1989, the Company entered into an agreement with a financial institution to sell, with limited recourse, an undivided interest in designated accounts receivable. Accounts receivable sold under this agreement totaled $60 million as of December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991. Costs associated with the sale of customer accounts receivable of $2.2 million, $2.6 million and $3.5 million for 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively, are included in Other Income and Deductions-Miscellaneous.
6. SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
The Company borrows short-term funds from banks and through the sale of commercial paper as needed. Under minimal fee arrangements, the Company has confirmed bank lines of credit totaling $153 million, of which $149 million remains available at December 31, 1993.
7. COMMON STOCK EQUITY, PREFERRED STOCK AND REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK
Retained earnings at December 31, 1993 included $16 million which was not available for cash dividends on common stock under the provisions of the Indenture of Mortgage securing First Mortgage Bonds.
During 1991, the Company reacquired and retired the 800,000 shares of the $2.33 and 800,000 shares of the $2.20 Cumulative No Par Preferred Stock with a combined stated value of $40 million. This transaction included a $4.7 million premium of which $2.9 million was charged against capital stock premium and expense and $1.8 million was charged against retained earnings.
In February 1992, the Company redeemed and retired the 130,000 shares of the 7.72% Cumulative Preferred Stock with a par value of $13 million. The cost of redeeming this stock included a premium of $0.3 million which was charged against retained earnings.
In April 1992, the Company issued $50 million, Cumulative No Par Preferred Stock, Auction Series A, stated value of $100 per share. The $0.9 million in costs associated with this issue were charged to capital stock premium and expense.
The issued cumulative preferred stock of $91 million may be redeemed at the option of the Company at prices which, in the aggregate, total $91 million.
Scheduled mandatory sinking fund requirements for the outstanding redeemable 4% Cumulative Preferred Stock are $160,000 per year.
At December 31, 1993, the Company had authorized 407,557 shares of Cumulative Preferred Stock at a par value of $100 per share, 1,572,000 shares of Cumulative No Par Preferred Stock and 11,000,000 shares of Preference Stock without par value.
If any dividends on its preferred stock are not declared and paid when scheduled, the Company could not declare or pay dividends on its common stock or acquire any shares in consideration thereof. If the amount of any such unpaid dividends equals four or more full quarterly dividends, the holders of preferred stock, voting as a single class, could elect representatives to the Company's Board of Directors.
On January 3, 1994, the Company registered 2,000,000 shares of its common stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission for a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (the Plan). Under the Plan, common shareholders and employees and directors of the Company and its subsidiaries have the opportunity to purchase shares of the Company's common stock by reinvesting dividends and/or making optional cash payments. Rather than issuing new shares, the Company intends to purchase the shares for the Plan on the open market.
8. LONG-TERM DEBT
First Mortgage Bonds
The Company cannot issue additional First Mortgage Bonds authorized by the Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust dated as of December 1, 1946, as supplemented, as long as any of the General Mortgage Bonds (discussed below) are outstanding. Substantially all of the Company's utility plant is pledged under the terms of the Indenture.
At December 31, 1993, $60 million was held as a special deposit and used on January 5, 1994 to redeem the maturing $60 million First Mortgage Bonds.
General Mortgage Bonds
The Company is authorized to issue General Mortgage Bonds under the General Mortgage Indenture and Deed of Trust dated December 1, 1986, as supplemented. The amount of additional bonds which may be issued is subject to certain restrictive provisions of the General Mortgage Indenture. The General Mortgage Indenture constitutes a mortgage lien on substantially all of the Company's utility plant and is junior to the lien of the First Mortgage. Upon retirement and/or maturity of the remaining outstanding First Mortgage Bonds, the General Mortgage Bonds will become first mortgage bonds.
The Company pledged General Mortgage Bonds in the amount of $531 million to secure the outstanding $453 million (including $74 million classified as current maturities of long-term debt) and the unissued $78 million of Medium- Term Notes as of December 31, 1993.
Scheduled Maturities
The amount of long-term debt maturing in each of the next five years is as follows (in millions): 1994 - $134.5; 1995 - $30.0; 1996 - $47.3; 1997 - $0.8; and 1998 - $61.9.
9. JOINTLY-OWNED ELECTRIC UTILITY PLANTS
The Company has joint ownership agreements with other utilities providing undivided interests in utility plants at December 31, 1993 as follows (in millions of dollars):
Each participant must provide its own financing. The Company's share of direct expenses is included in the corresponding operating expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
10. QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
The business of the Company is subject to seasonal fluctuations with peak periods occurring during summer months. See Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for discussion of items affecting quarterly results.
11. EVENT (UNAUDITED) SUBSEQUENT TO THE DATE OF THE INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT
In March 1994, the Company offered a voluntary early retirement program to 411 eligible management and union employees. Eligible employees have until May 31, 1994 to decide whether or not to participate in the program. As of March 24, 1994, approximately 35% of eligible employees had elected to participate.
The Company's last early retirement program in 1986 had a participation rate of approximately 60% of those eligible. While there is no way of knowing how many or which employees will elect to participate in the program, assuming the 1986 participation rate and using averages, the cost of the program to the Company would be approximately $22 million and would be recorded in the first half of 1994 as an expense when the employee elects to participate in the program. The Company estimates that these program costs would be offset by savings of payroll and benefit costs of approximately $6 million in 1994 and an average of $11 million per year for the period 1995 through 1998. These savings assume no replacements for retiring employees.
The expense and savings of the program as discussed above are estimates and could change significantly because of changes from the assumed participation rate, mix of employees accepting the offer, and extent of replacements of retiring employees.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors Kansas City Power & Light Company:
We have audited the consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedules of Kansas City Power & Light Company listed in the index on page 39 of this Form 10-K. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Kansas City Power & Light Company as of December 31, 1993 and 1992, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1993, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedules referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information required to be included therein.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for incremental nuclear refueling outage costs in 1992.
/s/Coopers & Lybrand COOPERS & LYBRAND
Kansas City, Missouri January 28, 1994
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Directors
The information concerning directors required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K has been furnished by the Company in its definitive proxy statement dated March 11, 1994, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Executive Officers
See Part I, page 7, entitled "Officers of the Registrant."
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K has been furnished by the Company in its definitive proxy statement dated March 11, 1994, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information required by Item 403 of Regulation S-K has been furnished by the Company in its definitive proxy statement dated March 11, 1994, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
None.
PART IV
ITEM 14.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K Page No. Financial Statements
a. Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 1993 and 1992 18-19
b. Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991
c. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991
d. Consolidated Statements of Cumulative Preferred Stock & Long-Term Debt - December 31, 1993 and 1992 22
e. Consolidated Statements of Retained Earnings for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991 22
f. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 23
g. Report of Independent Accountants																																							37
Financial Statement Schedules
a. Schedule V - Property, Plant and Equipment - For the years ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991 42-44
b. Schedule VI - Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization of Property, Plant and Equipment - For the years ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991 45-47
c. Schedule IX - Short-Term Borrowings - December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991
Compensatory Plans or Arrangements
a. Long-Term Incentive Plan 41
b. Indemnification Agreement entered into by the Company with each of its officers and directors 41
c. Executive Incentive Compensation Plan 41
d. Severance Agreement entered into by the Company with certain of its executive officers 41
e. Supplemental Executive Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plan 41
Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
Exhibit Number Description of Document
3-a *Restated Articles of Consolidation of the Company dated as of May 5, 1992 Exhibit 4 to Registration Statement, Registration No. 33-54196). 3-b *By-laws of the Company, as amended and in effect on December 31, 1993 (Exhibit 3-b to Form 10-K for the year ended 1993). 4-a *General Mortgage and Deed of Trust dated as of December 1, 1986, between the Company and United Missouri Bank N.A. (formerly United Missouri Bank of Kansas City, N.A.), Trustee (Exhibit 4-bb to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1986). 4-b *Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 1, 1991, to Indenture dated as of December 1, 1986 (Exhibit 4-aq to Registration Statement, Registration No. 33-42187). 4-c *Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 15, 1992, to Indenture dated as of December 1, 1986 (Exhibit 4-y to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1991). 4-d *Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 15, 1992, to Indenture dated as of December 1, 1986 (Exhibit 4-a to Form 10-Q dated September 30, 1992). 4-e *Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 1, 1992, to Indenture dated as of December 1, 1986 (Exhibit 4-z to Registration Statement, Registration No. 33-54196). 4-f *Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 1, 1993, to Indenture dated as of December 1, 1986 (Exhibit 4-a to Form 10-Q dated September 30, 1993). 4-g *Eighth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 1, 1993, to Indenture dated as of December 1, 1986 (Exhibit 4 to Registration Statement, Registration No. 33-51799). 4-h Ninth Supplemental indenture dated as of February 1, 1994, to Indenture dated as of December 1, 1986. 4-i *Resolution of Board of Directors Establishing 3.80% Cumulative Preferred Stock (Exhibit 2-R to Registration Statement, Registration No. 2-40239). 4-j *Resolution of Board of Directors Establishing Stock (Exhibit 2-S to Registration Statement, Registration No. 2-40239). 4-k *Resolution of Board of Directors Establishing 4.50% Cumulative Preferred Stock (Exhibit 2-T to Registration Statement, Registration No. 2-40239). 4-l *Resolution of Board of Directors Establishing 4.20% Cumulative Preferred Stock (Exhibit 2-U to Registration Statement, Registration No. 2-40239). 4-m *Resolution of Board of Directors Establishing 4.35% Cumulative Preferred Stock (Exhibit 2-V to Registration Statement, Registration No. 2-40239). 4-n *Certificate of Designation of Board of Directors Establishing the $50,000,000 Cumulative No Par Preferred Stock, Auction Series A (Exhibit 4-a to Form 10-Q dated March 31, 1992). 4-o *Indenture for Medium-Term Note Program dated as of April 1, 1991, between the Company and The Bank of New York (Exhibit 4-bb to Registration Statement, Registration No. 33-42187). 4-p *Indenture for Medium-Term Note Program dated as of February 15, 1992, between the Company and The Bank of New York (Exhibit 4-bb to Registration Statement, Registration No. 33-45736). 4-q *Indenture for Medium-Term Note Program dated as of November 15, 1992, between the Company and The Bank of New York (Exhibit 4-aa to Registration Statement, Registration No. 33-54196). 10-a *Copy of Wolf Creek Generating Station Ownership Agreement between Kansas City Power & Light Company, Kansas Gas and Electric Company and Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. (Exhibit 10-d to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1981). 10-b *Copy of Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of September 27, 1989, between the Company, Commercial Industrial Trade-Receivables Investment Company and Citicorp North America, Inc., (Exhibit 10-p to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1989). 10-c *Copy of Amendment to Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of August 8, 1991, between the Company, Commercial Industrial Trade-Receivables Investment Company and Citicorp North America, Inc. (Exhibit 10-m to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1991). 10-d *Long-Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 28 to Registration Statement, Registration No. 33-42187). 10-e *Copy of Indemnification Agreement entered into by the Company with each of its officers and directors (Exhibit 10-O to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1986). 10-f *Copy of Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (Exhibit 10-g to form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1986). 10-g *Copy of Severance Agreement entered into by the Company with certain of its executive officers (Exhibit 10 to Form 10-Q dated June 30, 1993). 10-h Copy of Supplemental Executive Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plan. 10-i Copy of $50 million Letter of Credit and reimbursement agreement dated as of August 19, 1993, with The Toronto-Dominion Bank. 10-j Copy of $56 million Letter of Credit and Reimbursement Agreement dated as of August 19, 1993, with Societe Generale, Chicago Branch. 10-k Copy of $50 million Letter of Credit and Reimbursement Agreement dated as of August 19, 1993, with The Toronto-Dominion Bank. 10-l Copy of $40 million Letter of Credit and Reimbursement Agreement dated as of August 19, 1993, with Deutsche Bank AG, acting through its New York and Cayman Islands Branches. 12 Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges. 23-a Consent of Counsel. 23-b Consent of Independent Public Accountants--Coopers & Lybrand. 24 Powers of Attorney.
* Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as exhibits to prior registration statements (except as otherwise noted) and are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. The exhibit number and file number of the documents so filed, and incorporated herein by reference, are stated in parenthesis in the description of such exhibit.
Copies of any of the exhibits filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with this document may be obtained from the Company upon written request.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Kansas City, and State of Missouri on the 25th day of March, 1994.
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
By /s/Drue Jennings (Drue Jennings) Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature Title Date Chairman of the Board and ) /s/Drue Jennings President (Principal ) (Drue Jennings) Executive Officer) ) ) Senior Vice President-Finance ) /s/B. J. Beaudoin (Principal Financial ) (B. J. Beaudoin) Officer) ) ) /s/Neil Roadman Controller (Principal ) (Neil Roadman) Accounting Officer ) ) William H. Clark* Director ) ) Robert J. Dineen* Director ) March 25, 1994 ) ) Arthur J. Doyle* Director ) ) W. Thomas Grant II* Director ) ) George E. Nettels, Jr.* Director ) ) George A. Russell* Director ) ) Dr. Linda Hood Talbott* Director ) ) Robert H. West* Director ) )
*By /s/Drue Jennings (Drue Jennings) Attorney-in-fact

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
KILOWATT (KWH) SALES AND OPERATING REVENUES Sales and revenue data: Increase (Decrease) From Prior Year 1993 1992 KWH Revenues KWH Revenues (Millions) (Millions) Retail sales: Residential 13 % $ 30 (12)% $ (33) Commercial 3 % 9 (2)% (4) Industrial 3 % 3 6 % 3 Other 1 % - 1 % - Total retail 6 % 42 (4)% (34) Sales for resale: Bulk power sales 27 % 13 51 % 12 Other 5 % - (6)% - Total operating revenues $ 55 $ (22)
Although 1993 temperatures have been milder than normal, residential and commercial sales reflect closer to normal temperatures during 1993 compared to the abnormally mild weather of 1992 and warmer than normal weather of 1991. Based on the Company's records of cooling degree days above 65 degrees Fahrenheit, the summer of 1992 was the coolest since 1950. The weather conditions were the primary cause for the variances in residential and commercial sales although both 1993 and 1992 also reflect load growth. Industrial kwh sales continued to increase over prior years and reflect increased large customer usage in the steel, auto manufacturing, grain processing and plastic container production sectors.
Bulk power sales reflect an increase in the number of sales commitments, the Company's high unit and fuel availability, and the requirements of other electric systems.
Changes in total revenue per kwh are due to changes in the mix of kwh sales among customer classifications and the effect on certain classifications of declining price per kwh as kwh usage increases. Less than 1% of the Company's revenues are affected by an automatic fuel adjustment provision.
Tariffs have not changed materially since 1988. Effective January 1, 1994, Missouri jurisdictional retail rates were reduced 2.66%, or approximately $12.5 million annually, primarily to reflect the end of the Missouri Public Service Commission (MPSC) rate phase-in amortization. This agreement with the MPSC and public counsel also includes a provision whereby none of the parties can file for a general increase or decrease in Missouri retail electric rates prior to January 1, 1996. Approximately two-thirds of total retail sales are from Missouri customers.
The level of future kwh sales will depend upon weather conditions, customer conservation efforts, competing fuel sources and the overall economy of the Company's service territory. Sales to industrial customers, such as steel and auto manufacturers, are also affected by the national economy. The level of bulk power sales in the future will depend upon the availability of generating units, fuel costs, requirements of other electric systems and the Company's system requirements.
Also, issues facing the electric utility industry such as transmission access, demand-side management programs, increased competition and retention of large industrial customers could affect sales. Alternative sources of electricity, such as cogeneration, could affect the retention of, and future sales to large industrial customers.
COMPETITION
The National Energy Policy Act of 1992 gave the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) the authority to require electric utilities to provide wholesale transmission line access (wholesale wheeling) to independent power producers and other utilities. Amendments to the Public Utility Holding Company Act simplified the organization of exempt wholesale generators, who engage exclusively in generating electricity for wholesale markets. Although the Act prohibits FERC from ordering retail wheeling (allowing retail customers to select a different power producer and use the transmission facilities of the host utility to deliver the energy), the Act itself does not prevent the state commissions from doing so. The state commissions however, may be preempted by other provisions of the Federal Power Act. If retail wheeling were allowed, utilities with large industrial customers could face intense competition and potentially lose a major customer which could place an unfair, costly burden on the remaining customer base or shareholders.
The Company continues to evaluate the effects of competition on its operations and position itself for a more competitive marketplace. It has been participating in wholesale wheeling voluntarily and has tariffs in place to accommodate these activities. The Company has a diverse customer mix with less than 18% of total sales derived from industrial customers as compared to a utility average of approximately 35%. The Company's industrial rates are competitively priced compared to the regional average and its rate structure allows some flexibility in setting
rates. In addition, Company sponsored programs help customers manage their electricity consumption, and control their costs.
FUEL, PURCHASED POWER, OTHER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE EXPENSES
Wolf Creek completed its sixth scheduled refueling outage during 1993 and returned on-line after 73 days. The Company began accruing for this outage in January 1992 (see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the 1992 change in accounting principle). The prior refueling outage began in 1991, before the Company started accruing for these costs, and extended into January 1992. Because these costs, as well as a forced outage in 1992, had not been accrued, all expenses associated with these outages were expensed as incurred. As a result, 1992 expenses associated with Wolf Creek outages (including amounts accrued beginning in January 1992) exceeded amounts expensed in 1993 by $5.6 million ($0.06 per share) and 1992 expenses were less than 1991 expenses by $4.6 million ($0.05 per share). The next refueling outage is scheduled to begin in September 1994.
Combined fuel and purchased power expenses for 1993 increased over 1992 and 1991 reflecting additional sales. Partially offsetting these increases, fuel prices and freight rates have gradually decreased since 1991.
Other operation expenses increased during 1993 and 1992 reflecting increased generating plant production expenses and higher levels of administrative and general expenses mostly due to increased wages and employee benefits, and the 1993 accrual of postretirement benefits (see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
The Company continues to place emphasis on cost control. Processes are being reviewed and changed to provide increased efficiencies and improved operations.
INCOME TAXES
The change in income tax expense is mostly due to the changes in income subject to tax, but 1993 also reflects an increase of approximately $2 million in federal income tax expense because federal income tax rates increased.
GENERAL TAXES
Components of general taxes (in thousands):
Increases in property taxes since 1991 are primarily due to the Kansas school finance legislation. The Company estimates the effects of this legislation will increase future property taxes over 1993 levels by approximately $1 million.
The majority of Missouri customers are billed gross receipts tax based on billed revenues.
OTHER INCOME AND DEDUCTIONS
Miscellaneous and Income Taxes - 1992 reflects gains from the sale of property and other contract settlements.
INTEREST CHARGES
Declines in long-term interest expense since 1991 reflect lower interest rates on variable rate debt and the retirement, repayment or refinancing of debt. The average interest rate paid on long-term debt including current maturities declined to 6.0% in 1993 compared to 6.6% in 1992 and 7.5% in 1991.
Declines in short-term interest expense reflect the decreasing interest rates since 1991 and a lower level of short-term debt outstanding during 1993. The average daily outstanding balance of short-term debt decreased to $16 million in 1993 from $60 million in 1992 and $50 million in 1991.
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS
The 1992 decrease in the preferred stock dividend requirements compared to 1991 reflects the refinancing of higher rate preferred stock with variable rate preferred stock.
EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS)
EPS for 1993 increased $0.31 over 1992 and EPS for 1992 decreased $0.23 from 1991.
The effects of weather increased 1993 EPS by approximately $0.25 over 1992 and decreased 1992 EPS by approximately $0.46 from 1991. Temperatures in 1993 were milder than normal, but closer to normal compared to the extremely mild weather in 1992 and warmer than normal weather of 1991. Based on a statistical relationship between sales and the differences in actual and normal temperatures for the year, the Company estimates the effects of abnormal weather for the last three years were as follows:
1993 1992 1991 Estimated effects of abnormal weather on EPS $ (0.10) $ (0.35) $ 0.11
In addition to the effects of abnormal weather on EPS, 1993 expenses associated with Wolf Creek outages (including outage accruals which began in January 1992) decreased from 1992 resulting in an increase in EPS of $0.06. These same 1992 expenses decreased from 1991 causing an increase in 1992 EPS of $0.05.
EPS for 1993 and 1992 reflect efforts of the Company to control costs despite increases in production expenses and general and administrative expenses. Also, since 1991, the Company has refinanced a significant portion of its long-term debt and preferred stock to take advantage of lower rates. EPS for 1992 also reflect gains from the sales of property and other contract settlements.
PROJECTED CONSTRUCTION EXPENDITURES
Construction expenditures, excluding AFDC, were $129.2 million in 1993 and are projected for the next five years as follows:
The Company's resource plan includes four new 146 megawatt (mw) gas- fired combustion turbines scheduled to be completed from 1998 through 2000. In addition, the plan envisions a new 705 mw (250 mw, Company's share) coal- fired generating unit scheduled to begin construction in 1997 and be completed by 2002. The projected construction expenditures include $200.2 million of forecasted costs for these projects during the next five years. The Company's resource plan is subject to periodic review and modification. The next integrated resource plan will be submitted to the MPSC in July 1994.
WOLF CREEK
Wolf Creek is one of the Company's principal generating facilities representing approximately 17% of the Company's accredited generating capacity and 26% of the Company's annual kwh generation during the last three years, and has the lowest fuel cost of any of its generating facilities. The plant operated at 80%, 85% and 59% of capacity for 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. Wolf Creek's assets and operating expenses represent approximately 50% and 20% of the Company's total assets and operating expenses, respectively. Currently no major equipment replacements are anticipated and the Company estimates the cost of nuclear fuel per million BTU, after the next refueling in the fall of 1994, will increase from approximately 35% to 40% of the cost of coal. Based on contract prices and projected future spot market prices for nuclear fuel and coal, it is anticipated that by 1996 the cost of nuclear fuel will increase in relation to coal to be about one-half the cost of coal.
An extended shut-down of the unit could have a substantial adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Higher replacement power and other costs would be incurred as a result. Although not expected, an abnormal shut-down of the plant could be caused by adverse incidents at the plant or by actions of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission reacting to safety concerns at the plant or other similar nuclear facilities. If a long-term shut-down occurred, the state regulatory commissions could consider reducing rates by excluding Wolf Creek investment from rate base.
Ownership and operation of a nuclear generating unit exposes the Company to potential retroactive assessments and property losses in excess of insurance coverage. These risks are more fully discussed in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements-Commitments and Contingencies-Nuclear Liability and Insurance.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
The Company's policy is to act in an environmentally responsible manner and utilize the latest technological processes possible to avoid and treat contamination. The Company continually conducts environmental audits designed to assure compliance with governmental regulations and detect contamination. However, these regulations are constantly evolving; governmental bodies may impose additional or more rigid environmental regulations which could require substantial changes to the Company's operations or facilities.
See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements-Commitments and Contingencies-Environmental Matters-for discussion of costs of compliance with environmental laws and regulations and a potential liability (which the Company believes is not material to its financial condition or results of operations) for cleanup costs under the Federal Superfund law.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 contain two programs significantly affecting the utility industry. Based on the results of current studies, the Company estimates total capital expenditures needed to comply with existing and proposed acid rain program regulations will be $4.1 million for the installation of continuous emission monitoring equipment. The Company has spent $2.9 million as of December 31, 1993 and has included the remaining $1.2 million in the five year projected construction expenditures. Future acid rain program regulations may require the Company to make further capital expenditures, but it is not possible to estimate those expenditures, if any. The other utility-related program calls for a study of certain air toxic substances. Based on the outcome of this study, regulation of air toxic substances, including mercury, could be required. The Company cannot, at this time, predict the likelihood of any such regulations or compliance costs.
CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS AND LIQUIDITY
On January 3, 1994, Moody's Investors Service upgraded the credit rating of the Company's bonds due to an improved financial profile and low-cost operations. The Company's long-term debt was upgraded as follows: secured pollution control bonds to A1 from A2; general mortgage bonds-medium-term notes to A1 from A3; unsecured pollution control bonds to A2 from Baa1; and, preferred stock to a2 from a3. In addition, in 1993 Standard & Poor's Corporation and Duff & Phelps upgraded the Company's General Mortgage Bonds as follows: Standard & Poor's from A- to A; and Duff & Phelps from A to A+. Improved ratings will make it less costly for the Company to raise funds when needed and will contribute to the Company's continued efforts to meet the challenge of increased competition in the utility industry.
The Company's capital structure at December 31, 1993 (including current maturities of long-term debt less special deposit for retirement of debt) consisted of 49.1% common stock equity, 5.1% preferred stock and 45.8% long- term debt. The Company's goal is to maintain a capital structure in which the percentages of common stock equity and long-term debt are approximately equal.
The Company currently estimates that it will be able to meet a significant portion of the projected construction expenditures with internally-generated funds. It is anticipated that funds for maturing debt through 1998 totaling $274.5 million will be provided from operations, refinancings or short-term debt. As of December 31, 1993, the Company had $78 million of registered but unissued Medium-Term Notes and $149 million of unused bank lines of credit. Uncertainties which affect the
degree to which these capital requirements will be met with funds provided from operations include such items as the effect of inflation on operating expenses, the level of kwh sales, regulatory actions, compliance with future environmental regulations, availability of the Company's generating units and the level of bulk power sales with other utilities.
The Company currently uses an accelerated depreciation method for tax purposes. The accelerated depreciation on the Wolf Creek plant has reduced the Company's tax payments during the last three years by approximately $30 million per year. Accelerated depreciation on Wolf Creek ends in 1994.
See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements-Commitments and Contingencies-Tax Matters-for discussion of the Company's federal income tax returns for the years 1985 through 1990 which are presently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service.
In order to take advantage of the potential benefits inherent in a larger energy system, the Company might incur additional debt and/or issue additional equity to finance system growth or new growth opportunities, through business combinations or other investments such as an exempt wholesale generator.
SUBSEQUENT EVENT
The Company announced an early retirement program in March 1994. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of the expense and savings of the program.
ITEM 8.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31 December 31 1993 1992 ASSETS (Thousands)
UTILITY PLANT, at original cost (Notes 1, 8 and 9) Electric $ 3,240,384 $ 3,133,059 Less-Accumulated depreciation 1,019,714 948,266 Net utility plant in service 2,220,670 2,184,793 Construction work in progress 67,766 65,965 Nuclear fuel, net of amortization of $76,722,000 and $78,735,000 29,862 34,210 Total 2,318,298 2,284,968
REGULATORY ASSET - DEFERRED WOLF CREEK COSTS (Note 1) 29,118 39,484
REGULATORY ASSET - RECOVERABLE TAXES (Note 1) 122,000 94,000
INVESTMENTS AND NONUTILITY PROPERTY 28,454 27,570
CURRENT ASSETS Cash 1,539 128 Special deposit for the retirement of debt (Note 8) 60,118 - Receivables Customer accounts receivable (Note 5) 29,320 14,372 Other receivables 19,340 24,043 Fuel inventories, at average cost 14,550 20,625 Materials and supplies, at average cost 44,157 45,263 Prepayments 4,686 4,209 Deferred income taxes (Note 3) 3,648 5,553 Total 177,358 114,193
DEFERRED CHARGES Regulatory Assets (Note 1) Settlement of fuel contracts 20,634 25,751 KCC Wolf Creek carrying costs 9,575 12,311 MPSC rate phase-in plan - 7,072 Other 31,899 26,798 Other deferred charges 17,732 14,776 Total 79,840 86,708
Total $ 2,755,068 $ 2,646,923
LIABILITIES
CAPITALIZATION (Notes 7 and 8)(See Statements) Common stock-authorized 150,000,000 shares without par value-61,908,726 shares issued and outstanding-stated value $ 449,697 $ 449,697 Retained earnings 418,201 405,985 Capital stock premium and expense (1,747) (1,758) Common stock equity 866,151 853,924 Cumulative preferred stock 89,000 89,000 Cumulative preferred stock (redeemable) 1,756 1,916 Long-term debt 733,664 788,209 Total 1,690,571 1,733,049
CURRENT LIABILITIES Notes payable to banks (Note 6) 4,000 - Commercial paper (Note 6) 25,000 33,000 Current maturities of long-term debt 134,488 26,500 Accounts payable 59,421 77,162 Dividends declared 423 423 Accrued taxes 27,800 19,864 Accrued interest 15,575 12,949 Accrued payroll and vacations 20,127 18,044 Accrued refueling outage costs (Note 1) 7,262 12,600 Other 8,531 7,631 Total 302,627 208,173
DEFERRED CREDITS AND OTHER LIABILITIES Deferred income taxes (Note 3) 627,819 576,222 Deferred investment tax credits 87,185 91,530 Other 46,866 37,949 Total 761,870 705,701
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 4)
Total $ 2,755,068 $ 2,646,923
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Year Ended December 31
1993 1992 1991 (Thousands)
ELECTRIC OPERATING REVENUES $ 857,450 $ 802,668 $ 825,101
OPERATING EXPENSES Operation Fuel 130,117 130,032 132,100 Purchased power 31,403 21,868 22,226 Other 184,633 175,937 162,548 Maintenance 78,550 81,163 80,922 Depreciation 91,110 88,768 86,795 Taxes Income (Note 3) 69,502 51,691 61,871 General 95,659 92,461 88,525 Amortization of MPSC rate phase-in plan (Note 1) 7,072 7,072 7,072 Deferred Wolf Creek costs (Note 1) 13,102 13,102 11,734 Total 701,148 662,094 653,793
OPERATING INCOME 156,302 140,574 171,308
OTHER INCOME AND DEDUCTIONS Allowance for equity funds used during construction 2,846 1,073 539 Deferred Wolf Creek carrying costs (Note 1) - - 791 Miscellaneous (2,486) 2,595 (3,829) Income taxes (Note 3) 1,549 (505) 1,593 Total 1,909 3,163 (906)
INCOME BEFORE INTEREST CHARGES 158,211 143,737 170,402
INTEREST CHARGES Long-term debt 50,118 54,266 63,057 Short-term notes 750 2,749 3,299 Miscellaneous 4,113 2,173 2,665 Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (2,542) (1,785) (2,512) Total 52,439 57,403 66,509
YEARLY RESULTS Net income 105,772 86,334 103,893 Preferred stock dividend requirements 3,153 3,062 6,023 Earnings available for common stock $ 102,619 $ 83,272 $ 97,870
Average number of common shares outstanding 61,908,726 61,908,726 61,908,726 Earnings per common share $ 1.66 $ 1.35 $ 1.58 Cash dividends per common share $ 1.46 $ 1.43 $ 1.37
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31
1993 1992 1991 (Thousands) CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net income $ 105,772 $ 86,334 $ 103,893 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation 91,110 88,768 86,795 Amortization of: Nuclear Fuel 8,705 9,583 6,199 Deferred Wolf Creek costs 13,102 13,102 10,943 MPSC rate phase-in plan 7,072 7,072 7,072 Other 8,234 5,921 5,147 Deferred income taxes (net) 25,502 23,979 28,064 Investment tax credit (net) (4,345) (4,521) (7,009) Allowance for equity funds used during construction (2,846) (1,073) (539) Cash flows affected by changes in: Receivables (10,245) 2,848 13,636 Fuel inventories 6,075 (859) 137 Materials and supplies 1,106 654 (98) Accounts payable (17,741) 4,838 2,861 Accrued taxes 7,936 2,404 2,995 Accrued interest 2,626 488 (1,244) Wolf Creek refueling outage accrual (5,338) 12,600 - Settlement of fuel contracts - - (8,578) Other operating activities 6,419 1,599 2,175 Net cash provided by operating activities 243,144 253,737 252,449
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Construction expenditures (129,199) (129,559) (122,447) Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (2,542) (1,785) (2,512) Other investing activities 306 (4,589) (5,404) Net cash used in investing activities (131,435) (135,933) (130,363)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Issuance of long-term debt 324,846 134,750 135,250 Issuance of preferred stock - 50,000 - Retirement of long-term debt (271,480) (143,230) (163,215) Retirement of preferred stock - (13,000) (40,000) Special deposit for the retirement of debt (60,118) - - Premium on reacquired stock and long-term debt (4,077) (2,321) (5,516) Increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings (4,000) (53,000) 42,500 Dividends declared (93,556) (91,277) (90,232) Other financing activities (1,913) 274 (879) Net cash used in financing activities (110,298) (117,804) (122,092)
Net increase (decrease) in cash 1,411 - (6) Cash at beginning of year 128 128 134 Cash at end of year $ 1,539 $ 128 $ 128
Cash paid during the year for: Interest (net of amount capitalized) $ 47,361 $ 55,223 $ 66,290 Income taxes $ 40,141 $ 32,995 $ 37,117
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CUMULATIVE PREFERRED STOCK AND LONG-TERM DEBT
December 31 1993 1992 CUMMULATIVE PREFERRED STOCK (Note 7) (in thousands) $100 Par Value 3.80% - 100,000 shares issued $ 10,000 $ 10,000 4.50% - 100,000 shares issued 10,000 10,000 4.20% - 70,000 shares issued 7,000 7,000 4.35% - 120,000 shares issued 12,000 12,000 No Par Value 3.04%* - 500,000 shares issued 50,000 50,000 Total $ 89,000 $ 89,000
CUMMULATIVE PREFERRED STOCK (REDEEMABLE) (Note 7) $100 Par Value 4.00% - 17,557 and 19,157 shares issued $ 1,756 $ 1,916
LONG-TERM DEBT (EXCLUDING CURRENT MATURITIES) (Note 8) First Mortgage Bonds 7.33% weighted average rate, amounts redeemed in 1993 $ - $ 244,980 9.46% series due 1994 - 60,000 5 7/8% series due 2007 21,940 21,940 Secured by General Mortgage Bonds Medium-Term Notes due 1994-2008, 6.78% and 7.29% weighted average rate at December 31 378,750 220,000 3.34%* Environmental Improvement Revenue Refunding Bonds due 2012-23 122,846 31,000 Guaranty of Pollution Control Bonds 5 3/4% series due 2003 13,742 13,980 3.15%* due 2015-17 196,500 196,500 Unamortized Premium and Discount (net) (114) (191) Total $ 733,664 $ 788,209
* Variable rate securities, weighted average rate as of December 31, 1993
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF RETAINED EARNINGS Year ended December 31 1993 1992 1991 (in thousands) Beginning Balance $ 405,985 $ 411,161 $ 399,294 Net Income 105,772 86,334 103,893
511,757 497,495 503,187 Premium on Reacquired Preferred Stock - 233 1,794 Dividends Declared: Preferred Stock, at required rates 3,169 2,747 5,417 Common Stock - $1.46, $1.43 and $1.37 per share 90,387 88,530 84,815 Ending Balance (Note 7) $ 418,201 $ 405,985 $ 411,161
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
System of Accounts
The accounting records of Kansas City Power & Light Company (the Company) are maintained in accordance with the Uniform System of Accounts prescribed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and generally accepted accounting principles.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and KLT Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Because KLT Inc. is not an electric utility, its revenues and expenses have been classified under Other Income and Deductions in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
KLT Inc. was formed in 1992 as a holding company for various non- regulated business opportunities. The Company's equity investment in KLT Inc. was $4.5 million and $1.5 million as of December 31, 1993 and 1992, respectively.
Utility Plant
Utility plant is stated at historical costs of construction. These costs include taxes, payroll-related costs, including pensions and other fringe benefits, and an allowance for funds used during construction.
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (AFDC)
AFDC represents the cost of borrowed funds and a return on equity funds used to finance construction projects and is capitalized as a cost of construction work in progress. The portion attributable to borrowed funds is reflected as a reduction of interest charges while the portion applicable to equity funds is shown as a non-cash item of other income. When a construction project is placed in service, the related AFDC, as well as other construction costs, is used to establish rates under regulatory rate practices. The rates used to compute gross AFDC are compounded semi-annually and averaged 8.3% for 1993, 6.6% for 1992 and 7.7% for 1991.
Depreciation and Maintenance
Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis for jurisdictional property based on depreciation rates approved by the Missouri Public Service Commission (MPSC) and the Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC). Annual composite rates were approximately 2.9% during the last three years.
Costs of improvements to units of property are charged to the utility plant accounts. Property units retired or otherwise disposed are charged to accumulated depreciation, along with removal costs, net of salvage. Repairs of property and replacements of items determined not to be units of property are expensed as incurred.
Nuclear Plant Decommissioning Costs
In 1986, the MPSC estimated the cost of decommissioning the Wolf Creek Generating Station (Wolf Creek) to be $103 million in 1985 dollars. In 1989, the KCC estimated the cost to be $206 million in 1988 dollars. Then, in 1992, the MPSC increased its estimate to $347 million in 1990 dollars. In accordance with MPSC and KCC requirements, the jurisdictional portions of the Company's 47% share of these costs (current level of $3.2 million, annually) are being recovered and charged to other operation expenses over the life of the plant and placed in an external trust fund to be used only for the physical decommissioning of Wolf Creek (immediate dismantlement method) which is not expected to occur prior to 2025. A study was filed with the KCC and MPSC during 1993 estimating the projected decommissioning costs to be $370 million in 1993 dollars. Based on this study, it is expected that the MPSC will determine that no increase in the current level of the Missouri jurisdictional funding and expenses will be necessary. A hearing before the KCC is expected during 1994.
The investment in the trust fund, including reinvested earnings, was $14.3 million and $10.6 million at December 31, 1993 and 1992, respectively. These amounts are reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets under Investments and Nonutility Property with the related liabilities for decommissioning included in Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities-Other.
Nuclear Fuel
The cost of nuclear fuel is amortized to fuel expense based on the quantity of heat produced for the generation of electricity. Under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, the Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for the permanent disposal of spent nuclear fuel. Currently, the Company pays a quarterly fee of one mill per kilowatt-hour of net nuclear generation to the DOE for future permanent disposal services. Disposal costs are charged to fuel expense and recovered through rates. These disposal services may not be available prior to 2013 although an interim facility may be available earlier. Wolf Creek has an on-site, temporary storage facility for spent nuclear fuel which, under current regulatory guidelines, can provide storage space until approximately 2006. The Company believes additional temporary storage space can be constructed or obtained, as necessary.
Regulatory Assets
Certain costs are recorded as regulatory assets when a rate order allows the deferral and inclusion of the amortization in rates or when it is probable, based on historical regulatory precedent, that future rates established by the regulators will recover amortization of the costs. If subsequent recovery is not permitted, any unamortized balance, net of tax, would reduce net income.
Deferred Wolf Creek Costs
Orders from the KCC and MPSC provided for continued construction accounting for ratemaking purposes after the September 3, 1985 commercial in-service date of Wolf Creek through September 30, 1985 and May 5, 1986, respectively. The deferral of certain other carrying costs was also authorized. These deferrals are being amortized and recovered in rates over an approximate 10 year period ending in 1996.
Recoverable Taxes
See Income Taxes below for discussion.
Settlement Of Fuel Contracts
The Company has deferred the cost incurred to terminate certain coal purchase contracts. These costs are being amortized through the year 2002.
KCC Wolf Creek Carrying Costs
As ordered by the KCC, the Company deferred certain carrying costs through June 1991. The recovery and corresponding amortization of this deferral over six years began in July 1991.
MPSC Rate Phase-In Plan
MPSC's 1986 Wolf Creek rate phase-in plan resulted in the deferral of a cash recovery of a portion of the cost of equity and the carrying costs on the deferral. Recovery of these deferrals was completed December 31, 1993.
Effective January 1, 1994, the MPSC approved a 2.66% rate reduction (approximately $12.5 million annually) for the Company's Missouri retail customers primarily to reflect the completion of this amortization. The reduction will be spread evenly over the Missouri retail customer classes. This agreement with the MPSC and public counsel also includes a provision whereby none of the parties can file for a general increase or decrease in Missouri retail electric rates prior to January 1, 1996. Approximately two-thirds of total retail sales are from Missouri customers.
Other
Other regulatory assets include premium on redeemed debt, deferred flood costs, the deferral of costs to decommission and decontaminate federal uranium enrichment facilities and other costs. These deferrals are amortized over various periods extending to 2017.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The stated values of the Company's financial instruments as of December 31, 1993 and 1992 approximated the fair market values based on quoted market prices for the securities or for similar types of securities. If quotes were not available, the Company's incremental borrowing rate for similar types of debt was used.
Revenue Recognition
The Company utilizes cycle billing and accrues an estimated amount for unbilled revenue at the end of each reporting period.
Income Taxes
The Company has adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This statement is not materially different from FASB Statement No. 96, which the Company adopted in 1988. As a result, the Company establishes deferred tax liabilities and assets, as appropriate, for all temporary differences caused when the tax basis of an asset or liability differs from that reported in the financial statements. These deferred tax assets and liabilities must be determined using the tax rates scheduled by the tax law to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse.
The Regulatory Asset-Recoverable Taxes primarily reflects the future revenue requirements necessary to recover the tax benefits of existing temporary differences flowed through to ratepayers in the past. During 1993, the net change in the Regulatory Asset-Recoverable Taxes and Deferred income taxes included a $40 million increase resulting from the changes in the federal and Missouri state income tax laws effective January 1, 1993 and January 1, 1994, respectively. Although the Company has calculated its deferred tax assets and liabilities pursuant to FASB 109, operating income taxes were recorded in accordance with ratemaking principles. However, if FASB 109 were reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income, net income would remain the same.
Investment tax credits have been deferred when utilized and are amortized to income over the remaining service lives of the related properties.
Accrued Refueling Outage Costs - Change In Accounting Principle
Effective January 1992, the Company changed its method of accounting for incremental costs to be incurred during scheduled Wolf Creek refueling outages. Instead of expensing these costs as incurred, the Company is accruing forecasted outage costs evenly (monthly) over the unit's operating cycle which normally lasts approximately 18 months. The Company believes this method of accounting produces a more meaningful presentation of yearly results of operations than the prior method. Since the accrual began in January 1992, when Wolf Creek returned on-line from a refueling outage, there was no cumulative effect for the change in accounting principle. The pro forma effects for the year ended December 31, 1991 were not material but would have increased net income by $3.2 million ($0.05 per share). Because there was no refueling outage in 1992, the effect of this change decreased 1992 net income by $7.8 million ($0.13 per share).
Environmental Matters
The Company's policy is to accrue environmental and cleanup costs when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. The Company believes it has appropriately recorded all such costs related to environmental matters.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to previously issued financial statements in order to conform with the 1993 presentation.
2. PENSION PLANS AND OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Pension Plans
The Company has defined benefit pension plans for all its regular employees, including officers, providing for benefits upon retirement, normally at age 65. In accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), the Company has satisfied at least its minimum funding requirements. Benefits under these plans reflect the employee's compensation, years of service and age at retirement.
Provisions for pensions are determined under the rules prescribed by FASB Statement No. 87-Employers' Accounting for Pensions. The following is the funded status of the plans:
Components of provisions for pensions (in thousands):
Long-term rates of return on plan assets of 8% to 8.5% were used.
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
In addition to providing pension benefits, the Company provides certain postretirement health care and life insurance benefits for substantially all retired employees.
During the first quarter of 1993 the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 106-Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions. FASB 106 requires companies to accrue the cost of postretirement health care and life insurance benefits during an employee's active years of service. Previously, the Company expensed these costs as paid (pay-as-you-go). The Company currently recovers these costs through rates on a pay-as-you-go basis. As of December 31, 1992, the transition obligation under FASB 106 was approximately $23.5 million, with amortization over 20 years beginning in 1993.
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost (in thousands): Service cost for benefits earned during the year $ 616 Interest cost on the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO) 1,893 Amortization of unrecognized transition obligation 1,175 Net periodic postretirement cost 3,684 Less: Pay-as-you-go costs 1,109 Net increase in cost due to FASB 106 $ 2,575
The increase in the annual health care cost trend rate for 1994 is assumed to be 13%, decreasing gradually over a seven year period to its ultimate level of 6%. The Company's health care plan requires retirees to participate in the cost when premiums exceed a certain amount. Because of this provision, an increase in the assumed health care cost trend rate by 1% in each year would only increase the APBO as of December 31, 1993 by approximately $786,000 and the aggregate service and interest cost components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for 1993 by approximately $98,000.
Reconciliation of the status of postretirement benefit plans to amounts recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands):
December 31 APBO: Retirees $ (10,672) Fully eligible active plan participants (6,405) Other active plan participants (10,501) Unfunded APBO (27,578) Unrecognized loss 2,689 Unrecognized transition obligation 22,314 Accrued postretirement benefit obligation (included in Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities - Other) $ (2,575)
The weighted average discount rate of 7% and future salary level increases of 4% were used to determine the APBO.
Long-Term Incentive Plan
In 1992, the shareholders adopted a 10 year, Long-Term Incentive Plan for officers and key employees. Awards issued under the Plan cannot exceed three million common stock shares. During 1993 and 1992, awards to purchase 63,125 and 86,000 shares of common stock were granted with exercise prices of $23.875 and $21.625 per share, respectively. During 1993, awards to purchase 4,000 shares were canceled. Under granted stock options, recipients are entitled to receive accumulated dividends as though reinvested if the options are exercised and if the market price at the time of exercise equals or exceeds the grant price. Under the assumption that all shares will eventually be exercised, the Company expensed $0.1 million and $0.2 million in 1993 and 1992, respectively, representing accumulated dividends and the change in stock price since the date of grant. At December 31, 1993, options for 145,125 shares of common stock were outstanding and options for 41,000 shares were exercisable.
3. INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense as shown in the Consolidated Statements of Income consists of the following:
The following table shows a reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective rate reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the Company's income tax policies.
1993 1992 1991
Federal statutory income tax rate 35.0 % 34.0 % 34.0 % Differences between book and tax depreciation not normalized 1.3 1.7 1.8 Amortization of investment tax credit (2.5) (3.3) (4.3) State income taxes 3.3 3.9 4.0 Other 2.0 1.4 1.2 Effective income tax rate 39.1 % 37.7 % 36.7 %
The significant temporary differences resulting in deferred tax assets and liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows: December 31 1993 1992
(thousands)
Depreciation differences $ 476,637 $ 449,701 Recoverable taxes 122,000 94,000 Other 25,534 26,968 Net deferred income tax liability $ 624,171 $ 570,669
The net deferred income tax liability consists of the following: December 31 1993 1992 (thousands)
Gross deferred income tax assets $ (63,187) $ (64,746) Gross deferred income tax liabilities 687,358 635,415 Net deferred income tax liability $ 624,171 $ 570,669
4. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Nuclear Liability and Insurance
The Price-Anderson Act currently limits the public liability of nuclear reactor owners to $9.4 billion, including attorney costs, for claims that could arise from a nuclear incident. Accordingly, the Company and the other owners of Wolf Creek have liability insurance coverage of this amount which consists of the maximum available commercial insurance of $200 million and Secondary Financial Protection (SFP). SFP coverage is funded by a mandatory program of deferred premiums assessed against all owners of licensed reactors for any nuclear incident anywhere in the country. The maximum assessment per reactor is $79.3 million ($37.3 million, Company's share) per incident. The owners of Wolf Creek are jointly and severally liable for these charges, payable at a rate not to exceed $10 million ($4.7 million, Company's share) per incident per year.
The owners of Wolf Creek also have $2.8 billion of property damage, decontamination and decommissioning insurance for loss resulting from damage to the Wolf Creek facilities. Nuclear insurance pools provide $1.3 billion of coverage, while Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (NEIL) provides $1.5 billion. In the event of an accident, insurance proceeds must first be used for reactor stabilization and site decontamination. The remaining proceeds from the $2.8 billion insurance coverage ($1.3 billion, Company's share), if any, can be used for property damage up to $1.1 billion (Company's share), premature decommissioning costs up to $117.5 million (Company's share) in excess of funds previously collected for decommissioning (as discussed in Note 1) with the remaining $47 million (Company's share) available for either property damage or premature decommissioning costs.
The owners of Wolf Creek have also procured extra expense insurance from NEIL. Under both the NEIL property and extra expense policies, the Company is subject to retroactive assessment if NEIL losses, with respect to each policy year, exceed the accumulated funds available to the insurer under that policy. The estimated maximum retroactive assessments for the Company's share under the policies total approximately $9 million per year.
In the event of a catastrophic loss at Wolf Creek, the amount of insurance available may not be adequate to cover property damages and extra expenses incurred. Uninsured losses, to the extent not recovered through rates, would be assumed by the Company and could have a material, adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.
Nuclear Fuel Commitments
At December 31, 1993, Wolf Creek's nuclear fuel commitments (Company's share) were approximately $16 million for uranium concentrates through 1997, $126 million for enrichment through 2014 and $46 million for fabrication through 2014.
Tax Matters
The Company's federal income tax returns for the years 1985 through 1990 are presently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The IRS has issued Revenue Agent's Reports for the years 1985 through 1990. The Reports include proposed adjustments that would reduce the Company's Wolf Creek investment tax credit (ITC) by 25% or approximately $20 million and tax depreciation by 23% or approximately $190 million. These amounts include the continuing effect of the adjustments through December 31, 1993. These adjustments, principally, are based upon the IRS's contention that (i) certain start-up and testing costs considered by the Company to be costs of the plant, should be treated as licensing costs, which do not qualify for ITC or accelerated depreciation, and (ii) certain cooling and generating facilities should not qualify for ITC or accelerated depreciation.
If the IRS were to prevail on all of these proposed adjustments, the Company would be obligated to make cash payments, calculated through December 31, 1993, of approximately $95 million for additional federal and state income taxes and $50 million for corresponding interest. After offsets for deferred income taxes, these payments would reduce net income by approximately $30 million.
The Company has filed a protest with the appeals division of the IRS. Based upon their interpretation of applicable tax principles and the tax treatment of similar costs and facilities with respect to other plants, it is the opinion of management and outside tax counsel that the IRS's proposed Wolf Creek adjustments are substantially overstated. Management believes any additional taxes, together with interest, resulting from the final resolution of these matters will not be material to the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
Environmental Matters
The Company's operations must comply with federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. The generation of electricity utilizes, produces and requires disposal of certain products and by-products including polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB's), asbestos and other potentially hazardous materials. The Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, the "Superfund" law, imposes strict joint and several liability for those who generate, transport or
deposit hazardous waste as well as the current property owner and predecessor owner at the time of contamination. The Company continually conducts environmental audits designed to detect contamination and assure compliance with governmental regulations. However, compliance programs necessary to meet future environmental laws and regulations governing water and air quality, including carbon dioxide emissions, hazardous waste handling and disposal, toxic substances and the effects of electromagnetic fields, could require substantial changes to the Company's operations or facilities.
Interstate Power Company of Dubuque, Iowa (Interstate) filed a lawsuit in 1989 against the Company in the Federal District Court for the District of Iowa seeking from the Company contribution and indemnity under the Superfund law for cleanup costs of hazardous substances at the site of a demolished gas manufacturing plant in Mason City, Iowa. The plant was operated by the Company for very brief periods of time before the plant was demolished in 1952. The site and all other properties the Company owned in Iowa were sold to Interstate in 1957. The Company estimates that the cleanup could cost up to $10 million. The Company's estimate is based upon an evaluation of available information from on-going site investigation and assessment activities, including the costs of such activities.
In August 1993, the Company, along with other parties to the lawsuit, received a letter from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) notifying each such party that it was considered a potentially responsible party for cleanup costs at the site. The EPA has also proposed to list the site on the National Priorities List.
The Company believes it has several valid defenses to this action including the fact that the 1957 sales documents included clauses which require Interstate to indemnify the Company from and against all claims and damages arising after the sale. However, the Court in an October 1993 order rejected this position, ruling that the indemnity clauses were not sufficiently broad to indemnify for environmental cleanup. This order will be final for appeal after a trial to allocate the cleanup costs among the parties, which is expected in 1994. Even if unsuccessful on the liability issue, the Company does not believe its allocated share of the cleanup costs will be material to its financial condition or results of operations.
Other Agreements
Under long-term contractual arrangements, the Company's share of purchased coal totaled approximately $17 million in 1993 and $21 million in 1992 and 1991. The Company's share of purchase commitments in 1993 dollars under the remaining terms of the coal contracts is approximately $110 million. The Company also purchases coal on the spot market.
The Company has a transmission line lease with another utility whereby, with FERC approval, the rental payments can be increased by the lessor, after which the Company is entitled to cancel the lease if able to secure an alternative transmission path. Total commitments under this lease are $1.9 million per year and approximately $60 million over the remaining life of the lease if the lease is not canceled.
Under other leases, the Company incurred rental expense during the last three years of approximately $15 million to $19 million per year. Rental commitments under these leases for railroad cars, computer equipment, buildings, a transmission line and similar items are approximately $114 million over the remaining life of the leases with payments during each of the next five years ranging from a high of $17 million in 1994 to $8 million in 1998. Capital leases are not material to the Company and are included in the amounts discussed above.
The Company has contracted to purchase capacity from other utilities through 2009. The obligations are as follows (cost in millions):
Cost Megawatts (mw) 1994 $12.4 470 1995 15.1 450 1996 19.4 500 1997 22.8 500 1998 22.8 500 1999 22.8 500 2000 16.6 150
Thereafter - annual amounts through 2009 10.4 150
5. SALE OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
In 1989, the Company entered into an agreement with a financial institution to sell, with limited recourse, an undivided interest in designated accounts receivable. Accounts receivable sold under this agreement totaled $60 million as of December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991. Costs associated with the sale of customer accounts receivable of $2.2 million, $2.6 million and $3.5 million for 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively, are included in Other Income and Deductions-Miscellaneous.
6. SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
The Company borrows short-term funds from banks and through the sale of commercial paper as needed. Under minimal fee arrangements, the Company has confirmed bank lines of credit totaling $153 million, of which $149 million remains available at December 31, 1993.
7. COMMON STOCK EQUITY, PREFERRED STOCK AND REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK
Retained earnings at December 31, 1993 included $16 million which was not available for cash dividends on common stock under the provisions of the Indenture of Mortgage securing First Mortgage Bonds.
During 1991, the Company reacquired and retired the 800,000 shares of the $2.33 and 800,000 shares of the $2.20 Cumulative No Par Preferred Stock with a combined stated value of $40 million. This transaction included a $4.7 million premium of which $2.9 million was charged against capital stock premium and expense and $1.8 million was charged against retained earnings.
In February 1992, the Company redeemed and retired the 130,000 shares of the 7.72% Cumulative Preferred Stock with a par value of $13 million. The cost of redeeming this stock included a premium of $0.3 million which was charged against retained earnings.
In April 1992, the Company issued $50 million, Cumulative No Par Preferred Stock, Auction Series A, stated value of $100 per share. The $0.9 million in costs associated with this issue were charged to capital stock premium and expense.
The issued cumulative preferred stock of $91 million may be redeemed at the option of the Company at prices which, in the aggregate, total $91 million.
Scheduled mandatory sinking fund requirements for the outstanding redeemable 4% Cumulative Preferred Stock are $160,000 per year.
At December 31, 1993, the Company had authorized 407,557 shares of Cumulative Preferred Stock at a par value of $100 per share, 1,572,000 shares of Cumulative No Par Preferred Stock and 11,000,000 shares of Preference Stock without par value.
If any dividends on its preferred stock are not declared and paid when scheduled, the Company could not declare or pay dividends on its common stock or acquire any shares in consideration thereof. If the amount of any such unpaid dividends equals four or more full quarterly dividends, the holders of preferred stock, voting as a single class, could elect representatives to the Company's Board of Directors.
On January 3, 1994, the Company registered 2,000,000 shares of its common stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission for a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (the Plan). Under the Plan, common shareholders and employees and directors of the Company and its subsidiaries have the opportunity to purchase shares of the Company's common stock by reinvesting dividends and/or making optional cash payments. Rather than issuing new shares, the Company intends to purchase the shares for the Plan on the open market.
8. LONG-TERM DEBT
First Mortgage Bonds
The Company cannot issue additional First Mortgage Bonds authorized by the Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust dated as of December 1, 1946, as supplemented, as long as any of the General Mortgage Bonds (discussed below) are outstanding. Substantially all of the Company's utility plant is pledged under the terms of the Indenture.
At December 31, 1993, $60 million was held as a special deposit and used on January 5, 1994 to redeem the maturing $60 million First Mortgage Bonds.
General Mortgage Bonds
The Company is authorized to issue General Mortgage Bonds under the General Mortgage Indenture and Deed of Trust dated December 1, 1986, as supplemented. The amount of additional bonds which may be issued is subject to certain restrictive provisions of the General Mortgage Indenture. The General Mortgage Indenture constitutes a mortgage lien on substantially all of the Company's utility plant and is junior to the lien of the First Mortgage. Upon retirement and/or maturity of the remaining outstanding First Mortgage Bonds, the General Mortgage Bonds will become first mortgage bonds.
The Company pledged General Mortgage Bonds in the amount of $531 million to secure the outstanding $453 million (including $74 million classified as current maturities of long-term debt) and the unissued $78 million of Medium- Term Notes as of December 31, 1993.
Scheduled Maturities
The amount of long-term debt maturing in each of the next five years is as follows (in millions): 1994 - $134.5; 1995 - $30.0; 1996 - $47.3; 1997 - $0.8; and 1998 - $61.9.
9. JOINTLY-OWNED ELECTRIC UTILITY PLANTS
The Company has joint ownership agreements with other utilities providing undivided interests in utility plants at December 31, 1993 as follows (in millions of dollars):
Each participant must provide its own financing. The Company's share of direct expenses is included in the corresponding operating expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
10. QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
The business of the Company is subject to seasonal fluctuations with peak periods occurring during summer months. See Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for discussion of items affecting quarterly results.
11. EVENT (UNAUDITED) SUBSEQUENT TO THE DATE OF THE INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT
In March 1994, the Company offered a voluntary early retirement program to 411 eligible management and union employees. Eligible employees have until May 31, 1994 to decide whether or not to participate in the program. As of March 24, 1994, approximately 35% of eligible employees had elected to participate.
The Company's last early retirement program in 1986 had a participation rate of approximately 60% of those eligible. While there is no way of knowing how many or which employees will elect to participate in the program, assuming the 1986 participation rate and using averages, the cost of the program to the Company would be approximately $22 million and would be recorded in the first half of 1994 as an expense when the employee elects to participate in the program. The Company estimates that these program costs would be offset by savings of payroll and benefit costs of approximately $6 million in 1994 and an average of $11 million per year for the period 1995 through 1998. These savings assume no replacements for retiring employees.
The expense and savings of the program as discussed above are estimates and could change significantly because of changes from the assumed participation rate, mix of employees accepting the offer, and extent of replacements of retiring employees.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors Kansas City Power & Light Company:
We have audited the consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedules of Kansas City Power & Light Company listed in the index on page 39 of this Form 10-K. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Kansas City Power & Light Company as of December 31, 1993 and 1992, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1993, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedules referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information required to be included therein.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for incremental nuclear refueling outage costs in 1992.
/s/Coopers & Lybrand COOPERS & LYBRAND
Kansas City, Missouri January 28, 1994
ITEM 9.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
PART III
ITEM 10.


ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Directors
The information concerning directors required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K has been furnished by the Company in its definitive proxy statement dated March 11, 1994, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Executive Officers
See Part I, page 7, entitled "Officers of the Registrant."
ITEM 11.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K has been furnished by the Company in its definitive proxy statement dated March 11, 1994, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information required by Item 403 of Regulation S-K has been furnished by the Company in its definitive proxy statement dated March 11, 1994, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
None.
PART IV
ITEM 14.
ITEM 14.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K Page No. Financial Statements
a. Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 1993 and 1992 18-19
b. Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991
c. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991
d. Consolidated Statements of Cumulative Preferred Stock & Long-Term Debt - December 31, 1993 and 1992 22
e. Consolidated Statements of Retained Earnings for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991 22
f. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 23
g. Report of Independent Accountants																																							37
Financial Statement Schedules
a. Schedule V - Property, Plant and Equipment - For the years ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991 42-44
b. Schedule VI - Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization of Property, Plant and Equipment - For the years ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991 45-47
c. Schedule IX - Short-Term Borrowings - December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991
Compensatory Plans or Arrangements
a. Long-Term Incentive Plan 41
b. Indemnification Agreement entered into by the Company with each of its officers and directors 41
c. Executive Incentive Compensation Plan 41
d. Severance Agreement entered into by the Company with certain of its executive officers 41
e. Supplemental Executive Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plan 41
Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
Exhibit Number Description of Document
3-a *Restated Articles of Consolidation of the Company dated as of May 5, 1992 Exhibit 4 to Registration Statement, Registration No. 33-54196). 3-b *By-laws of the Company, as amended and in effect on December 31, 1993 (Exhibit 3-b to Form 10-K for the year ended 1993). 4-a *General Mortgage and Deed of Trust dated as of December 1, 1986, between the Company and United Missouri Bank N.A. (formerly United Missouri Bank of Kansas City, N.A.), Trustee (Exhibit 4-bb to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1986). 4-b *Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 1, 1991, to Indenture dated as of December 1, 1986 (Exhibit 4-aq to Registration Statement, Registration No. 33-42187). 4-c *Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 15, 1992, to Indenture dated as of December 1, 1986 (Exhibit 4-y to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1991). 4-d *Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 15, 1992, to Indenture dated as of December 1, 1986 (Exhibit 4-a to Form 10-Q dated September 30, 1992). 4-e *Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 1, 1992, to Indenture dated as of December 1, 1986 (Exhibit 4-z to Registration Statement, Registration No. 33-54196). 4-f *Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 1, 1993, to Indenture dated as of December 1, 1986 (Exhibit 4-a to Form 10-Q dated September 30, 1993). 4-g *Eighth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 1, 1993, to Indenture dated as of December 1, 1986 (Exhibit 4 to Registration Statement, Registration No. 33-51799). 4-h Ninth Supplemental indenture dated as of February 1, 1994, to Indenture dated as of December 1, 1986. 4-i *Resolution of Board of Directors Establishing 3.80% Cumulative Preferred Stock (Exhibit 2-R to Registration Statement, Registration No. 2-40239). 4-j *Resolution of Board of Directors Establishing Stock (Exhibit 2-S to Registration Statement, Registration No. 2-40239). 4-k *Resolution of Board of Directors Establishing 4.50% Cumulative Preferred Stock (Exhibit 2-T to Registration Statement, Registration No. 2-40239). 4-l *Resolution of Board of Directors Establishing 4.20% Cumulative Preferred Stock (Exhibit 2-U to Registration Statement, Registration No. 2-40239). 4-m *Resolution of Board of Directors Establishing 4.35% Cumulative Preferred Stock (Exhibit 2-V to Registration Statement, Registration No. 2-40239). 4-n *Certificate of Designation of Board of Directors Establishing the $50,000,000 Cumulative No Par Preferred Stock, Auction Series A (Exhibit 4-a to Form 10-Q dated March 31, 1992). 4-o *Indenture for Medium-Term Note Program dated as of April 1, 1991, between the Company and The Bank of New York (Exhibit 4-bb to Registration Statement, Registration No. 33-42187). 4-p *Indenture for Medium-Term Note Program dated as of February 15, 1992, between the Company and The Bank of New York (Exhibit 4-bb to Registration Statement, Registration No. 33-45736). 4-q *Indenture for Medium-Term Note Program dated as of November 15, 1992, between the Company and The Bank of New York (Exhibit 4-aa to Registration Statement, Registration No. 33-54196). 10-a *Copy of Wolf Creek Generating Station Ownership Agreement between Kansas City Power & Light Company, Kansas Gas and Electric Company and Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. (Exhibit 10-d to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1981). 10-b *Copy of Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of September 27, 1989, between the Company, Commercial Industrial Trade-Receivables Investment Company and Citicorp North America, Inc., (Exhibit 10-p to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1989). 10-c *Copy of Amendment to Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of August 8, 1991, between the Company, Commercial Industrial Trade-Receivables Investment Company and Citicorp North America, Inc. (Exhibit 10-m to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1991). 10-d *Long-Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 28 to Registration Statement, Registration No. 33-42187). 10-e *Copy of Indemnification Agreement entered into by the Company with each of its officers and directors (Exhibit 10-O to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1986). 10-f *Copy of Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (Exhibit 10-g to form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1986). 10-g *Copy of Severance Agreement entered into by the Company with certain of its executive officers (Exhibit 10 to Form 10-Q dated June 30, 1993). 10-h Copy of Supplemental Executive Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plan. 10-i Copy of $50 million Letter of Credit and reimbursement agreement dated as of August 19, 1993, with The Toronto-Dominion Bank. 10-j Copy of $56 million Letter of Credit and Reimbursement Agreement dated as of August 19, 1993, with Societe Generale, Chicago Branch. 10-k Copy of $50 million Letter of Credit and Reimbursement Agreement dated as of August 19, 1993, with The Toronto-Dominion Bank. 10-l Copy of $40 million Letter of Credit and Reimbursement Agreement dated as of August 19, 1993, with Deutsche Bank AG, acting through its New York and Cayman Islands Branches. 12 Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges. 23-a Consent of Counsel. 23-b Consent of Independent Public Accountants--Coopers & Lybrand. 24 Powers of Attorney.
* Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as exhibits to prior registration statements (except as otherwise noted) and are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. The exhibit number and file number of the documents so filed, and incorporated herein by reference, are stated in parenthesis in the description of such exhibit.
Copies of any of the exhibits filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with this document may be obtained from the Company upon written request.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Kansas City, and State of Missouri on the 25th day of March, 1994.
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
By /s/Drue Jennings (Drue Jennings) Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature Title Date Chairman of the Board and ) /s/Drue Jennings President (Principal ) (Drue Jennings) Executive Officer) ) ) Senior Vice President-Finance ) /s/B. J. Beaudoin (Principal Financial ) (B. J. Beaudoin) Officer) ) ) /s/Neil Roadman Controller (Principal ) (Neil Roadman) Accounting Officer ) ) William H. Clark* Director ) ) Robert J. Dineen* Director ) March 25, 1994 ) ) Arthur J. Doyle* Director ) ) W. Thomas Grant II* Director ) ) George E. Nettels, Jr.* Director ) ) George A. Russell* Director ) ) Dr. Linda Hood Talbott* Director ) ) Robert H. West* Director ) )
*By /s/Drue Jennings (Drue Jennings) Attorney-in-fact