quire bolstering up like that—does it want such nursing by bringing forward persons who tell incredible stories which are an insult to anyone possessed of a grain of common sense ? Would any of you, hearing these screams, and seeing your master chasing another person out of his house, place your arms upon the fence, eight yards from the gate by which the fugitive was seeking to escape, make no offer of assistance by stopping him, and never even make your presence known ? Then you have Mrs. Ehren fried, and ; gentlemen, here again you have to deal with a very improbable story. It is a difficult story to get any person to believe, and I will tell you why. First of all, let me remind you that the prisonerhas no shield behind which to shelter himself, for his lips are sealed, and he cannot give evidence on his Own behalf. He does not seek to implicate any one, and up till this lime he has not manifested the slightest desire to do so. He had been found in the position described by some of the witnesses, ami no doubt he made up his mind to take the consequences. But you are asked to believe that on a calm, moon-light night, when people wereabout the streets and sounds could beheard at a long distance, this man entered the house fully lighted and with the door open,—that not knowing who were in the house—that he walked up to the door, went into the sitting room, stood a little time conversing with Mrs EhrenCried, whom he found there, and im mediately afterwards commences, for the first time in her life, to use force in the attempt to ravish her, and more than that, despite her screams for help, persists in the attempt, not knowing but that in the very next room there may be the two servants or the nephew and brother of whom Mrs Ehrinfned had spoken. That is the case she put before you. She said that sire did not tell him the servants were out. He knew that usually there were two servants in the house, and he met with nothing to show they were out, and neither was there anything to show that the two relatives were not there. You are actually asked to believe that he deliberately walked into the room, not knowing but that on the other sides of the boards there were the nephew and the brother, or the two servants, that he made a determined assault upon the woman, and persisted in using force, notwithstanding her screams. Nay, you are asked to believe a little more than that. You arc asked to be lieve that he did all this after she had told him that Mr Ehrinfried was out only for a short time, and might be expected back every minute. Taking it for granted that he knew about the nephew and brother being out, and the two servants being away, is it credible that this man should go in that night, put the woman upon her back upon the sofa, against her will, and proceed to assault her, not know ing for certain that at any moment her husband might not return, Don't misunderstand me upon this point. Supposing I take a book up in my hand which I know does not belong to me, and walk out of the Court with it, and that I am told " You must not take this book away; it is not yours." Supposing, however, I persist in my course, after my attention has been drawn to it, what conclusion could be come to but that I had persisted in the course which I had entered upon fully assured that I had the consent of the owner of the book to take it. But, supposing I take the book after I have been warned not to do so by the owner, that I persist, and then that he tells me "If you pass beyond this door with it there is a policeman on the other side who will appre hend you for theft," is it credible the man would persevere in his attempt? And yet this is what yon are actually asked to believe in the case of the prisoner. According to Mrs Ehrinfried's evidence, the prisoner was in tht'very actjwhen they were surprised, and this occurred at a stage when he could hardly be supposed to draw back. To take Mr. Ehren fried's own statement, they seemed both sur prised, and is that not the fact ? Is it not the fact that he came and surprised the one equally with the other ? Do you think that a strong and powerful woman like this, saying nothing of her will aud determination, possessed as she is of nerve of the strongest character, would submit to be pushed back on a sofa with one hand, while the other hand is engaged in a way I need not mention; that she would lie there screaming and calling for help, and yet be found in the condition she was in when Styak and Ehrenfried entered the room ? It would have required more than those two hands to do what is alleged. One hand held her down, and the other hand engaged in the way I rcfor to; one leg on the sofa and one on the woman. Gentle men, put it to yourselves, " Do you think it probable that a women of Mrs Ehrcnfried's physique and determination, unless she had given her consent, could be kept in such a position for any time ?" When I speak of her nerve, I do not exaggerate, for was not her composure in the box such as to excite the sur prise—l might say the admiration—of those who were in the Court? Yet we are asked to helievn that she could be held down upon a sofn with one knee ami one hand, while another hand was used to expose her in such a way as has been detailed to you. Do you believe that she was struggling to get away from that man? Bearing in mind that Mrs Ehrenfried was at the head of the sofa, and Gudgeon at the foot, do you think that when he pushed her back she could not have made her escape from the house to her neighbour (Mrs Conigan), who was only six feet off. [Mr Tyler: That is not so; the witness merely stated that the two houses were six feet apart, not that she was within six feet of Mra Ehrenfried], That is, of course, what I mean. Do you believe, gentlemen, that the prisoner could possibly have had any hope of effecting his purpose with the woman struggling as she says she did ? When she saw the first indica tion of Gudgeon's intention by the laying of his hand upon her indecently, do you believe that she could not have given an alarm that would have brought Mrs Corrigan or some other neighbour to her assistance. And is not that what you \yould have expected from a virtuous wife, But that was not done. With one hand she was laid upon her back, and she was kept down with it on her breast, while the other hand pulled up her dress. Then commenced the scream ing for the first time. The defendant puts her down, &c, and tries to carry out his nose, and she is all the time screaming, yet when these two persons enter the room, they find her upon her back at the head end of the sofa, and both the defendant and her exposed. Do you believe that in the time that must have elapsed for all that to be done, that it could have been done, if she had been screaming all the time for assistance ? Pass ing over for the present the idea of the husband being concealed in the house, does it not rather indicate that she did consent to what was done that night—that, remembering she was more familiar with the sound of anj ono approaching than the prisoner, and that from her position at the head of the sofa nearest to the door she could more readily detect any sound, that she did hear some voices—did hear something outside the house—and at once, if she screamed at all, screamed then ?. Was not that fhe 'cause of her struggle? She may have heard a step upon the shells of the garden walk, the click of the gate, _ a footstep upon the verandah, or a voice outside, and, fearing detection, then gave the alarm, supposing her to have been in the position that she states she was in. Is not that a consistent explanation ; and does it not make everything plain ? Nay, gentlemen, look at it in another way—the same point, but in a slightly dif ferent light. Supposing that the man had begun to make his overtures, did indecently touch Mrs Ehrenfried, and that ho did go a certain length, and that she then gave the alarm—was there anything to show him that the two servants were not in the next room, or that her nephew and her brother was not there; and if you admit the possibility of that for a moment, could you believe that he would be guilty of such gross foolishness as to persist iv the attempt while she was crying louder and louder for help, knowing, as he did, the two doors were open, and that he was within seven or eight feet of the public road ? The night, we are told, was calm, and people, no doubt, were passing to and fro. No, gentle men, I say again, if she had been resisting, even at that stage, a man with any sense about him would know that it was mad ness to persist in his course. If you take the statement of this witness as the truth, the first alarm must have given the prisoner sum cient time, not only to adjust his dress, but to have made his way out of either door of the sitting room, and so have accomplished his escape, but being found as they both were found is accounted for only by a sudden sur prise. These remarks are all directed to what, I submit, is an incredible story. I ask you to believe that the story, on the face of it, is not reasonable—that it wants something ex plained—some other evidence adduced, unless you are to look at it in the way suggested, namely, that the act was done by her consent, and' that both of them were equally surprised by the arrival of Messrs Ehrenfried and Styak. This version of the story, I submit, to you is quite clear; in short, it reduces the evidence to a state of consistency which is at once appreciated by a reasonable mind, To take it as it is, you must shut your minds to a common sense view of the whole circumstances; but, looked at in the way I suggest, everything it" quite pfcro and clear. Youmay say, "Give us some other reasons for taking this view," and, indeed, I should not have invited you to take a view of thiskind if I had not very considerable reasons for It. Look at what remarkable cir cumstances concurred on this night. Sin gularly enough to say, Mrs Ehrenfried has no one in the house with herj singularly enough, she has let her two servants go out for the night; singularly enough to, say, her nephew and her brother have gone to the theatre; singularly enough to say, Mr Ehrenfried makes a feint of going to Auckland; singularly enough

to say, there is not a soul in that house ] but herself. Is it not suggested that the j; •prisoner knew she was alone ? Do the pvo- ( '. secutioa undertake to show that, he was , aware of this? Therefore I submit that their j case is radically defective. They .would j ask you to believe that, not knowing Mrs I Ehrenfried to be alone, he walked into ' the house, and boldly committed this out rage. If they had shown that he knew . she was alone, I might perhaps have admitted I a great deal of reason in their story, but it is a I very improbable story, and it gets still more so as we proceed. View it in the light of an appointment having been made, then all that occurred is accounted for. Now, gentlemen, there are other circumstances connected with this, and I must ask you to consider if they do not open up matter for another view of this case altogether. Is there anything remarkable in Mr Elirenfried's pretended departure for i Auckland that night ? His very departure, to say nothing of its romantic view, is surrounded with the greatest possible suspicion—that that man should go to the trouble of going to the steamer, pretending to be leaving for Auck land, and to have gone to the trouble of arranging with a boatman and even giving him three shillings in older to buy a fishing tackle, so that he might be off Tararu fishing—is it at all likely ? Vo you thiuk it at all probable that he would go to all that trouble with the i steamer and then go ashore in the way he did ? Is there nothing remarkable either when he gets ashore. lie takes a coach, goes half-a mile or more along the road, and then turns back. He told you that he felt sick, but that was all the more reason for him to go home quickly. However, he turns back, makes another start, sees Captain Fraser at his gate, and then, for reasons best known to himself, turns back again. He tells the man to send another coach to pick up Captain Fraser, and another is accordingly sent, Then he makes a third start. Nor will' he say, gentlemen, that he did not hold up his umbrella in the coach, nor will he say either that he did not tell the cabman to say if he were stopped that he had got an invalid inside. Now, what were his reasons? The evening was the 21st of De cember, and you know at what time it gets dark in that month. Now, why did he leave at first ? And why did he start too soon ? What was the reason for turning back after going half-a-mile ? The second time he turns, he says, it was be cause he did not want this man in; and the third time he makes a start he goes right on when it is dark, But why did he start too soon first of all ? The hour which the defence suggest was . the "appointed" hour was nine o'clock. He asks you to believe that all this exertion, all this extraordinary caution, was done to enable him to return to his brewery in order to take his men by surprise. Par better to have surprised his men a little earlier, for their work was all but finished when he got there. Now, let us follow him to his brewery, where .he found only his brewer and his new manager He says that he wished to ascertain if they had carried out orders which he had given them on the previous day. Now, I do not know what these orders were.^tnd I do not know whether he took any trouble to ascertain if they had been carried out. He arrived within a short time of everything being finished, and he appears to have gone over the place in an ordinary way ; but he does not seem to have seen anything particular irt connection with the brewery. Nor does he seem to have done any specific act. What was the act that he wanted to see done pro perly ? He never mentioned one, nor Styak either. They passed a general inspection simply. Do you believe a man would go to all this trouble under such circumstances merely to see if his men were doing their work ? He says he has done it before, some two or three, years previously. Well, would you not say that it is a remarkable thing it should be done on this very night, and that of all persons in the world he should not have mentioned it to his wife. He told his wife that he might be a little late, and that if he were back in time he would take her to a concert; but if there on the a relationship existing between hus band and wife, would he not have told her of his ruse to pretend to go to Auckland and then to disembark at Tararu? Do you think for one moment that he would not have done that ? Do you believe that he is a man who would not have informed his wife of this if aconfidential relationship existed between them ? Nothing of the kind takes place. I ask you to conclude plainly from this that Mr Elircnfried had his suspicions that something of this kind was going on, and, in spite of his statement, that something improper was going on, for this explanation renders all consistent and plain. When he never told his wife that he was going to Auckland, and only pretended to go there, when he returned in this way, but not at daylight, and in coming back actually put up his umbrella in the coach so that no one could sec him—when he takes all these precautions to arrive at his house when his wife cannot know of hie approach, and thinks he is in Auckland when he is in Grahamstown, and when he is found at the house at the " appointed" liour, are you not justified in drawing the conclusion that I have indicated? And here I should just like to rofer you to the evidence of that man Collins, who spoke of having heard rumours concerning Mrs Ehrenfiried' and Gud geon, and o[ that being the reason why he paid attention to her remark. And I would ask you whether it is not likely that Mr Elnenfried had also heard of these rumours and suspicions against his wife, and on the night in question intentionally avoided anyone seeing bim, especially that person whom he refused to take up, knowing that he was friendly to Gudgeon, and might mention to him the fact of his having returned. Is not this consistent ? Is it nqt reasonable to think that he may have said to himself—" I have heard certain sus picions as to my wife's conduct, and, although I won't give tip confidence in her, yet there can be no harm in testing her upon this matter." Supposing he did suspect her, and wanted to test her, could he have done it more effectually ? Nay, iis not all that was done that very night just what a man would do in order to apply such a test ? Gentlemen, I sub mit he could not have done it more effectually. I will give you further' reasons for this explanation, I remind you, too, that the prisoner is in this position: that our law, merciful as ft is, says to him—"Your mouth is shut, and you cannot give evidence for your s;lf, but you will have this benefit instead, that the evidence must be conclusive as to your guilt before you shall be convicted." I draw your attention to Mr Ehrenfried's statement that he had lent this man money, and that he had importuned him for further sums. Whether there was gratitude or not on his part I will not say, for such a point ought not to enter into your consideration any more than the question whether the man acted discreditably. The question of gratitude is quite irrelevant to the case, and especially as to this loan, which I am instructed was never made. There

is no possibility of contradicting that state ment, as the matter is known only to the two, except by putting the prisoner in the box, which is impossible. In short, their friendship or acquaintance did cease, because, as he said, this man was importuning him for money. Why, if it had ceased, did, h.e recognise the prisoner upon this qccasjan at the wharf, and say to him—"Good night?" Does not all that point in the same direction : that some thing had occurred which had come under Mr Ehrenfried's eyes, and that he made his wife cut the connection with the Gudgeons, or, at any rate, not to, seek thoir friendship any further ? Now what was that something ? Mrs Ehrenfried denies that on the night of this Naval Champions concert her husband wonld not allow, her to go because he knew that defendant was going to be there too. But is thore not sufficient ground set up up to justify nic in asking you to consider this view, that there were grounds for suspicion, that he decided to put his wife to the test, that he was successful in surprising them both, and that he had placed the stick in readiness in order that he might be able to chastise the intruder. Now, gentlemen, 1 come to the further grounds. You may say to me "If you ask us to consider whether Mr Ehrenfried had grounds for suspicion of any improper Intimacy, show us the proofs," and this I do by entering into the painful part of the case. You saw how the first witness gave her testi mony, quite unconcernedly, no sign of dis comfiture, nothing to show that she was not speaking the whole truth, nothing to betray emotion or anything of the Ifincj, but a straightforward, deliberate story, told while looking the defendant almost in the face. Gentlemen, she was asked the question— and I reeal to your minds tha way in which the questions were put so as to lead up to the point to which I desire to call attention: you will remember, I say, that she was tirat asked, "Were you ever alone with Mr Gudgeon?"—" No.. '.. Then, " Did you ever ask anyone to say that you were never alone with him?"—" No." "Did you ever ask anyone to say that she was always 'withyou?"—"No." ''Did you ever ask anyone to say that you were nover a'one when Mr Ehrenfried was away?"—"JNo." " Did you writa lo anyone askiug her to say so?"— "Ho," "Did you write to Bertie Davis to that effect 2 s '-'''No," Th.en I cautiqued Jha' witness to be care ful as to wh'nt she said, and yet, after my caution, sue still made these deliberate answers—all of them flat denials. After tbat she was coniroiited. with her cwn let ters, ill her own writing, and the signatures to which ,she was obliged to acknowledge, What tloea that writing shew ? Does it not prove that the answers she made were not true 7-rthat she was not speaking the truth in answer to, a number of the questions that I put to her '| Bat, still to oarry on the ex amination, you will bear in mind the time she took when sho was asked to look at these letters In order to see if tbe signature was hers, She bad to read them before sho

was prepared to Rive an answer, and even* then what a time she took to scan tho letter, the end of it boing, as you know, that tlio officer read it. Did y.m not sco, after tho witness bad road the loiter and had gone through its contents, a change iv her manner, and a hesitation in answer ing? lv reply to my questions sUe would ofciy say, "I suppose < wiote the lclt?r, " I suppose that is my signature." 1 naked, "Havo you any doubt that that is your writing, i>nd that it is jour signature which is appended to it?" and she wa» obliged to admit that there was not, And now, gentlemen, is there any mau wiihln your ovtn knowledge who would have stood under similar circuiuxtances the meeting of such a let cr ? Thero is some importance to be attached to this point, a* showing a strong mind and a determination to meet any evidence that might be adduced. The witness exhibited great skill in the way she mot tho qucstious, and one could not fail to remark the ingenious way in which she tried to turn off the edge of them, Does not all that indicate rare oolness and nerve? It provci what 1 have said, tba'. she is a cool, collected, calm, determined woman, of i-troog nerve and phyeiqua. And, gentlemen, do you bi.lievc that she c uld not have got away on that night if. she had wlahr i it? Let us now cjnsider tli.se letters to which I havo just referred, and the inanuor in wbica ahe endeavoured to account for them. She nllegei thai the first one is an auswer to ono from Bertie Davis asking what she should say to persons who were enquiring about the ca c Now, ueo tk-mcD, is not thiit falsehood upin the very face of it ? Can anyone read that docu ment and believe for a moment that it is an answer to a letter from B ;rtie Davis ? f (His Honour:— Pardon me for interrupting you, Mr Hesketh, but you must rem mber .that the document you speak of was not an entire letter. Bertie Davis states that it was merely a postscript to auother letter, a much longer letter. Tho distiuction must be burno in mind). 11 ci, I remember tbat. You know, gentlemen, that all the nonsense and trivial part of a lady's letter v con t lined in tho body of it, and that tho pith is reserved for the postscript. 1 taks it that in this case, therefore, all that was trivial and commonplace was contained iv the missing part, aud thatthe postscript was kept because that it contained the pith. You will perceive that it commences with the enquiry—" Have you heard the dread ful news?' Now, if Bcrtio Davis hail written and said, as it is suggeated *ho did, that Gudfteon'3 people had beeii bad^erina her about the caBP, ehe must have known of tho arrest and of the surrounding circum stances, and consequently thero would be no need to ask her if she had heard the news of it, Then it proceeds:—" On Thursday evening my Louis was out for a short time, and there was s. knock at tht door, and In walked Gudgeon. Told, me his wife was in town, and then tried to assault me. I screamed for help, and in rushed Louis and Styak. 01 course Louis had him arrested. I thUk ho could not do otherwise. Sbe-called the other day for the first time, but I was out, and I have only met him in the street once sincoyouloft." Of course.if this bnppenad i. the way I ask you to balieve, Mrs Ehren fried could huve written to Bertie Davis in no other way. She was bound to write putting it in such a way, viz., that a knock cama to the door, andtliat Uudgeon walked in and tried to assault her. Now, b.ar in mind, gentlemen, that, so far iv I have read, thero is nothing to show that she had received a letter from Bertie Davit stating that she was being bad gered, and ro on. There is not the slightest room for tho idea that eho was only giving au answer to some quostiur that had been asked her, Tho letter goo.' on : -" jnow, dear Berta, I am goiagto a«k a great favour of you," Does that look like an answer to a letter ? Is tt not an in sult to your common seme to Busiest such a thing ? It only shows the desperat* posi tion in which the witneia found hersall when she tried to explain tint letier away She seized upon th:s explanation as n diwii iug persju clutches at a straw. I* tbert anything at ull to support tho view tha' the letter was a mere answer to Bertie Davis ? "I mv going to a'k a grvat fa?ou< of you, If anyone —it does not matter who — asks jou if ho and I wee over alone of an evon ing, simply say 'No.' You cie easily siy you were always with mo. And. oil, dear Bcrlio, I will nevoi forgot you.' Fancy remarks like these addressed t> i. perion requesting an answer to a questiou. "Say, if we weut out oE an evening, you were always with me, and when we came home you stayed with mo. Indeed, you need not own that ho came in the house at all of an evening. I am writing in great haste, Burn this directly you have, i oar) it, like a doar. Poor old Louis, h-> uin suoh a Etate; thinks it may upset mo. Hi is too pood-does not know what to dv enough for me—and so kind and thought ful. I pity him. Be sure and burn thi', aud do not let anyoin know what I havo written to you." Can you, by any possibility as reasonable men, believe that that wai written in nuswer to a qaea tion, beginning as it does—" lam goings to aik a groat favour of you," and concluding "if you do this, I will never forget you." Why should such expressions be a-ied In answer to quostion.l Look how unfortunate it U for her to make tho suggestion tint Bertie Davis had written to say ihat she had boon badgorod about certain th'ngs that she did not kno* whether to discloie. Does it not imply that she was cognisant of something in connection with Mrs Khren fried'a conduct that the latter was afraid of hating brought to light t Do you think that it is likely that she woaia have written *uch a lotter as tha ono I haro quoted from unloss she were aware- that she had beon guilty of conduct which it would bo unfortunate for her ti Imo marfc known 1 If this were not so, and Bertio Davis had written to enquire what ehe should say, would not the best answer aha could make be something like this: "You ask me what you shall say; say the truth." It was nor, necessary to bave said anything more than thin in such a cine. Her lotter, I repeat, refutes the probability of such a story as she ha< told you, and I will tell you why: If Mrs Ehrenfried was simply answering tha girl's questions aa to what she should say, why should there be such a pas-age in her letter as this—"Burn this directly you have read It, like a dear. Of course Louis does not know I am writing this to you, so keep it private and burn it at onco." And then agiin, unrier the signature,." Be sure and burn tbic, ' Now, gentlemen, I

ask you once morcj if this were a straight forward answer to the letter from this girl why should there be in it th'so throe re» quests to burn this letter, and to keep It private? X am referring to all this, and dwelling upon it for the purpose of showing you th&t there wa* some Intimacy between these people.. Can there bs ths slightest doaht in your minds tint there was some specialcauseforwiitingsucHalatter, and that that causs was tha tah $ aud G adgeun had been alone of; an evening when Mr Knrrnfricd was array, aud that a'ter he had returned home they were frequently alone at night. I raj, is not all this the act of a wonnn who was perfectly conscious tUat the- person sho wa? writing to knew all the?o thlugs 1 But, gentlemen, tbere 13 .another feature that i presents itself in r'g^rd to this letter, and \it U this • Can anyone read this document arid not come to this conclusion. The discovery has been made, apparently, and proceedings have been iostitu'ed, or are about to bs, to have tho man arrested, and this mater must comi befo-e the Court. Mrs Eheufiied, the principal actor in the scene, knowing this, and aware that her conduct would be closely scru'inised, asks herself the qifstien— "Who cm give evidence aaainst m-? Who knows anyihing agamst me? Bertie D.ivis. Then 1 must get Bertie Davis to promise not to di-elose »n\ thing. I must do my very best without delay to. soal hor lips, for she ii the only porson who can show what I do not want revealed." lJoss she not show by what she h»s written that sho felt herself to be in a desperata position, and that her thoushti falling upon tha one who knew all these things, she entreats her to tell He after lie i{ she is asked about them. Nqw, gebtleriun, I feel so confident that no reasonable man can doubt ■ this explanation that I will not tako up your tlm<s any fur ther upon it, There is no date to this document, and it is marked " Private," but whether it is intended as a postscript to a l'-nger letter pat in a separate envelope, or is a separate letter by itself, I do not kno-v. Mm JEhrenfried was asked why she slpu'd request the letter to he burnt, ft u,t hit ingenuity again came to the rescue; it wa«, s.taq sajd, because Bmie Davis bad told her to mark "burn " on any letter she pleased and it would be destroyed. Does not that show that the aqbiep1; of these letters was sucih that it might be cUsaqtroug for b/r it any other person? becamß acquainted with it ? Does not thii explanation of lurs, then, complicate the case? aud d,ies i$ rwt vrry forcibly show the unpleasant position in vfhichsho found hericlf placed! Another letter was produced, and it shows you still further that hor object Was such as I have asked you to believe. In this second letter, it U evident that' Mra Ehrenfried knew she had written something to the girl that might tell very much against her, and that it waa in her power to ptyce i,er i,u ai;

awkward position. It la with these im- ( i prelims in her mind that she writes tbe ,; letter referred to, which is dated tha seoud : of January: "My dear Bertie,—lam writing j just a few lines, as I feal very anxious about ( . the letters I have writ'en you, ia cisc you have ahown them to anyone. My dear girl, be sure and burn tbem, and do n it IoS any- ; ona read them. Burn thorn all ; thi* one , also." Then she refers to domestic matters, ■ and tho letter concludes with tbe repetition of thu s«ne request—" Now, ray dear Ber ie, if you have not burnt all my notes, do do at once. I hope you did not let them ( lie ab'JU>, or tell anyone the coateats. Burn this a'so." Does not that be-ray what | was working in the woman's mind? Do>» not it show an extreme anxiety oa her part with reference to wlsat stie had written to Bertie Davis? Does it not show extreme fear on her part that they riiiybi lying a^out and seen by soineoue, or that sha might tell of them ? What is' tha burdea of this second letter ? Any written evidence which ! cannot refute, burn it at once. The two Letters indicate that thi3 was lhe state of tbe woman's mind—in, sims way, right or wrong, this matter is to come bfore the pub'i?:, and it wi 1 <ell ogdnst me there *f theso Icttots are produced. They must therefore, be put out of the way. Why, if there was no intimacy of this kind should thate be such lexers writt3n,and why should she make such repea'ed request! trut the loiters might be bur.it. It is sug gested tint they were alone, and that Guigoin did coma to the house-trie very points on which the girl is a*ked to gay " No." Additional ground for b - lieviog ia the sugge*tei improper intimacy of the. pirties is supplied by tbe evidence of this girl. Lam not going to refer to the way iv which my learned friend cross examined her. No doubt he thought it right. She presents her.etf ia this posit ori: "1 have beea suaimond to produce Ittterj wh'ca I hid' Ist it hi kn->wn tint I had, and I have delivered »hem up.1' Th-n my friend aska her the qujstioa if she has not been in the hibit of telling lie*. Bat 1 submit thit.in tho face of thuselatteis.the.'e is not tho slightast ground fur suggesting that she his apokea what was false. She has told you that oa ona oc casion, when Mr Eh.eufried wjs in Auck land, sha unexpectedly entered tha parlour and found two figure* on the sofa, one of them being Mrs Ehre-fried and one a.nan. The three of them had come home together fiat night; the girl at oncj bide Gudgeon "good night," and that afterwards Mrs Ehreotrifd went out to tho door with him. The girl did not see Mr Gudgeon agdn. Mrs Ehrenfried went with him to the door ta say "ao^d ni^ht," and shortly aftur wardi the girl sees the figures in the dark in the next room. Sh» s*ys ibafc »hu oc;urred very often, viz., the escorting of ham home by Gudgeon, and, after their eatrance into the house, Mm EhMnfried's departure with him f«r the pnrpoße of saying "good-night," and her return same ten minutes afterward*. This oc curred S3 often that the girl could not cell the number of tim"S. She was accustomed to separate from them, bidding him " good night " and leaving them to th»mielve-. the was asked to tell m how long it was after sha had bade Mr Gudgson "good night " oa the evsning in question until she went in'.o the parlour and saw these (inures, and she told us that it was abouv ten minute*. Then she was asked how long it was after »h< sa,w ihe figures in the parlour until Mrs Ehraufried1 * re appeiratce, and she said about ten minutes or a quarter of an hour, go that on this occasion they were by themselves for twenty #r twenky-five miuutes. - [Thu Crown Prosecutor: No, ii »a» only ten minutes.—His Honor: Mr Honketh is quite right. That ii tha state ment of the girl.]—Tnat is what was staled by the girl. In face of the Utters, caa you doubt for one moment that she was tell.-ng us the truth ? You will al«oremember that she took a letter from Mrs ttbrenfried to Gudgeon while his home was buing built. Mrs Ehrenfried dome* this, and th«re is no one to provo it. But whatever Bertie Davis's evideace amouats to, it is quite sufficient for its purpoie to show that she knew of >hings which Mm Kbreufrlod w<s interested in getting her to conceal, as the letters wins a have been produced abuadaatly testify. She was asked why she had kept these letter?, and she said that it was in ordur to show that the wa« telling tbe truth when elm came to be called on to give evi dence. Ido not know that she could have given a better answer. ' Are cot these letters written to a per.ou full of informa tion ruinous to the character of the writer, and begging her not to dtclose it? Now, gentlemen, 1 think I have succeeded in my endoarour to show you the.c features ot tha case : Fir*t,that there wa<an improper inti macy b.tweeu Mrs Ehrenfried and the pri.oner; secondly, that this improper iutirna y had been going on so long that ie .v'ai quite possible for Mr Ehrenfried to hare heard of it; that he did heir of it, and determined this night to .tiako a test, and that there were.some ex traordinary concurrences, viz , that of the home being empty, that of the two ser vants b<ing away, which wai not a u«ual thiug for them, and Mr Ehrenfried'a re lurn, Itisav»ry strange thing that tbe t«vo servants should have been let out be fore Mr and Mrs Khronfried bad had thoir evening meal, and it is still more remark able th.t ihey themselves poatemplated locking up tke house and leaving not a soul in it. wst there not some special cause a» a reiison for it ? And was it not that he expecte 1 some one io call ? And is there not strong evidence of htr endeavour to eloar away every obstacle, so that the ob ject in view should be attained th«t night? With that object, I suggest that tiat man weit there by appoimmeat on that night. Of Mrs ehrenfried, I asked tbs question —" Did you see Mr Gudgeon about tne 11th ?" and she replied In tha «egative. I asked if she had nnt ieen him a few dajs before the 14th, told him that her huiband wjs going to the farm tint night, and asked if lie would come to the hou»e, and promising to have it in darkae«s. And now I ask you to consider the evidence given b,y fie man Coliiags, and I aak you to da so with considerable confidence-not only ai to his evidence, but ajso as to his demeanour. Was it not such as ts suggest to you. that tha reflection must have been pa-sing is the man's mind., was something like this : " Wf 11, th,e next time 1 hear any of this sort of thing 1 will keep it quiet. This is not of my seeking. While slowly walking along waiting for a mate, he parsed Mis ljiio/ifried and the prisoner talking together, and overheard her flse th.a words, " I'll have the home in d..irkaes3," It is not unworthy of coasidera tion that if, ai suggested, that the man has cotno forward and committed perjury, it ia only reasonable that some motive ahould ba shown for his conduct. You will bear in rainr'l that I asked Mrs Ebronfried i', when holding tha.t conversation with Gudgeon, she did not sei a man pass by, and Gudgeon telling her that the hid heard the words she had been speaking, and that the mm turne 1 round and looked at her. Sho says she never made any appointment, the never had the meeting spoken of, that ehe never had the con versation in which such words were made use of, and never bad seen the man Callings. But, fortunately, that man makoi a plain atr«Uhtforw;ud statement. Se did not give evidence for a friend, and he showed by his manner that he regarded it as a misfortune to be brought to the Court—that, in fact, his apporance here wasjuot of his seeking. I cannot find any reason or inducement for him to commit perjury by saying that which is not true. Therefore, gentlemen, I ask you to believe that Mrs threnfried did meet the prisoner in Pollen-street as alleged, had a coDversition with him, and in the course of it made the remark, " I'll have thj house in da'kness." Of course the argument that I am about to use to you is this : Jf it ia suggested that he committed per jury in order to prevent Gudgeon from being convicted, how easy it would ha,ve been for him to have goue a J\tUe farther and to have said tba,t. whilo standing at the shop windaw he heard Mrs Bhrenfried "not simply say "I'll have the house in darkness," but "Come up to-night at eight or ten o'clock; Ehrenfried is gone to the farm, and I'll have the house in darkness." How easy for him to have said something more even than this t bu^he just heard one remark madQ A a.n,d h,er,e.pe.ata it truthfully. That is another reason, why I ask you to conclude tb|as the mooting, on the nij;h'. ia qaestjon was by appointment. Now, tyra'Shrenfi'Udi was asKed, "Do you ten^^mbar meeting Gudgeon on the 18th of DeQember in Hollen-struet ?''and y,m will remember that she answered "Yes," that she remembers s;eing Gudgoon on that oc casion in company with Messrs Ueu'ey and Fra^e/, and that, after passing her, h.e ceparates himself from these gentle* mea and overtakes htr. Tbe;Q ia the fact, therefore, tbai the man leaves his two companions in the. street, and is eventually found walking with her. ">ow, Mrs Ehreaftied was asked, "Did you not, then, meet and tell him that qu the following Thursday Mr Ehrenfried was .going to Aucklaud to meet hja sister?, a,nd did you not say to him, ' Come, to the house at 9 o'clock : I have something important to tell you. I will be. on. the. verandah to meet you, and I'll have. th,e. hauso. in dark. ness?1" She deoies that But let us assume that the appointment was made j and is not i everything that happened tbat night quite i ..,: ■ ' % ■ :i

consistent with euch an appointment ? \'' not the actions of that ni^ht th» actions that would have tak°n t,Un, ,Vctf '■■■ not everything thit happened tba*;^- ;; quite opposed to the idsa of there h% l ' no appointment? She denies it w'" and I must leave you to consider hei-T ! 1 on that }. int, after pointing- out S^ >.'* how clofelythe exnlaun-ion I bay« « v ,, "' '|\ fits in with the occuirences of dW c? a;t''' IN It is a fact that Mr Ehrei.fried'f g,w'fi> . arrived in Auckland on the TaesdaJ viou.i, and therefore it is not nml^"' able tn suggest that she did B o ,°« 8 hm thn Although you have tn j i with thn case on the evidence Z a| :■ not precluded from diawiag proper « \ li sioas tiorn the evidence. Yon ar » "' s iy, "We shall be blind to inference" "" • U your especial province, your' na j} .1 X . duty—you wi'l not have done your I it you do not draw iuf erences. Ine l e ,"'"" Judge will a-dyouin it byhisexpcrietuW '! by his review o£ the evidence ; and hi ■? tell 5 on, as he has said before, that be l he his an opinion, it need no; oe'w.3! I: bs your.-.. The duty is can np^n Vw'1' -■ M decide whether or not she eneourarr. i ] •'' • to go to th; house that nigh', imd*k W &h; found that there was good reajn '■ ' 'think they would be surprised iKelSl i the alarm in order to relieve herself F- 8 suspicion What do the facts pro^B they istabll-h the principal assault ffl in yoa think they go to a certain extentt assault, leaving the rest to be rail" 11 from conclusions ? I aay it is your datv i provioce to draw conclusions. Wehav I ' right to interfere with you, and now I 01? f you, is thtre the slightest room forsuS I' in? that she did not give him aa iuvrS • ti come to her house that night i \ ■■■■?' I mu't refer for a few momenta' -'- Ehrenfried's and Styak's evidence |W ■ j I do that I w-uld invite your attention^ another circumstance. I asked li' lihrenf ied if she could not remember \ " oa the verandah of her house on"'' occasion wish Bertie Davi>i, and Gad "" piisiug by, and Bertie Davis waistline W : o»e'. She sad that this might have w 'place. Well, supposing that it was «o i then askvi her the question, " Diityoj I separate from Bertie Davis on the veralffi!-i!^Ks and go down into the.v'Wrfp K< - I %taud under that pinn tree. in,t:K I the fence,' and tallc ti Gudgeonti, X! over the fence I" I io.-gct Mrs Eareahify & j answer lo that question, hut I asked1' alao if she did not say, " There has ifi I row in consequence of an anonjmoiiaie? f which my hu.sba;d hai received, anil» had better not rccoguise each other t speak when we meet. If you are %J\ ' anything, say you do «od knofff' '.\\l"' course Bhe denies it. Thee I a-ked—"Jjil ' you immediately after that cease voa ''' visits to the Gudgeons V The U4j\&'■ | forced to admit this, but shesta'ed that ceased her visits because her iuita-l desired her to do io, as Gudgeon was«? I siantly importuning him for money; m ; you again, is it not quite coaaiatent m, ' what I asked her, viz., "Did jba tfaif tell Gudgeon that your husbaod C received an anonymous letter, that there " had been a row, and that it WkS tetterv« T should not speak or recogaise each 'otber- is Dot that, 1 aay, consistent as s, rewafo the cessation of tbe vishs, andbeinfcuo!! II Mr Khrjnfiied had receifed an amsi. raous leiter, and that coolness took Mii M doisa not that bring ua to the colaiaS;il poiat—that, having iecei»ed that etiiiiu moua letter, Mr Ehreufricd dete^mincli" test the truth of iis content?, msdaafduj of leaving for Auckland, and retumEiii'ti ■■> his home unexpectedly ? There is another > point, and it is this: counstl iWljl I sometimes ia a dilemma, and ate fa.' quently called upon at a maani uotice to ex.rcise their judgmeat1 millffiP oat ha vine any tinn for delibeii and therefore it may be suggested, a ;i! anticipate it will be, that questions fe!! been pat to Mrs Bhrenfrud, aot'bu3^H they were true, but simply to raise tfiiSPffl or thought in the minds o£ the jury ta the tnmgß euijeested did-take;place | should not have ducharged my dntyif,MMl not put these questions. My plain H ' was to put them in a way ia witicti i\d : could be to doubt as to the r ljteiius, and I feel confident in asking you, "Cki1 ? any pur.on have been to ingeEtons n i have put questions so circuuißtaatulf>^HKi these quesaons ? I say it is, beyomfiiiii power of any person to deviss ■O'slmmß questions like these, and to elicit from the witnesses • with tbem,»i unlfflß the information upon which he baaei ib>_ is correcr. There is this much that BifflS brought out by these qaestionf,- 'litw^K yoa to infer intimacy, and, ia duiiig tjl|iK a*k you, is there anything unlikely m |. iug what we have ? Going stiil iartluVi fearlesdly a«k you to take any queri* that I have put and say if it mvotr, ;■: ■ cumatance iustead of being a fabntil if it is not connected wiih the maia 9 ; of this case. Ido not disreg'trd what jit h< learmd friend may have to say on si ".' point, but I fcirle3ily ask you »j™|||B and consider it, and I feel sarc, ffit: that . consideration, you - will gus me the benefit of it, I be one word to say about Mesa Styak and Ehreufne<l. You will te. : member that the-e two geutlecieu iH that they had got to the orner of the sftnf - when tuey hoard the cries first, an-UW they measured ttie distance and fottod b« fiftotn yards—that when theyheai'tsi cries they immediately ran through thsf.if tnto th« ball-door, and into the niisi \ door of the fltting-room—the odo folksis upon the ho«l« of th* other. Does nottlat ; indicate that th« inmates of the rasaiiiut j have heard these two persons riiniHnj! And, first of all, I would rea)ind;yoi|^»ffi». they were talking of business when r tej heard the screams. I do not suggest te' they were talking loudly, bat, evou ui]<t 11 ing them to have been talking in tkorf.' nary way, tho night being calm, anaiis two doors referrod to baihg open, ma<t not ' something have been beaia by> tbose inait the house!—is it not likely that som^ng conld have been heard by a pattern v. >' kon& oi the sola? the crunching of ;Ma _ on the walk or the cl ok of the gate, iA ; the calmness of the night might render.lta'ip voices of those who were approacbinj! jfijt than usaally audible, and hence tlo i Of caurse 1 do not knov at tbatttei) what stage they had got. It is quite dar, too^ that they were in a position, so i« Mrs Unronfried is concerned, quite cm* ~ tent with the idea that they had cm It may also be suggested that Mr yw fried was in hia house, and opened ttu ' snddenly. Ido uot suggest tb,atMrfci> fried was in the house and.Mr Styak M aide, in the event of being required in;' evidence, I take it as a fact that Blf& > fried went away pretending to-goti if* I land, and then returned by the coach | turning back two or three time?, ■ with ijH umbrella put up so aa to cooceal biwa.i and it is jaat possible that he mayhiVJr: turned to th.c house and remaiaßd tlr'. For you, gentlemen, this is not iravwr^J1 of consideration, but I do not rest my '»' on that. That would be a plot on pF; of Mr Ehrenfried, within the oogntow:« ; his wife. I ask you to loekfat■ auolKf: feature Why was not that man an*,•; on the same night ? Mr Ehrenfdeo IB that he went to the Sergeant of P?B«wa| could not get a warrant, and he:adnjffl^ as.a reason why he could notgotiwiHS that night that a policeman cou'daw^ found; bat if the man hid' committed ": j offence he should have b3tn aCT'fe'J3' once. Why did he not go the sat Wu f however, for the purpose of procnrln? ! Jj . warrant ? Is that consistent witn|Hn| that he intended to take proieediogs! fti [ indeed, it is only on Saturday or^flHi night that at last hu doa t^ffljiH the warrant. Toere are-.tffd'';™SiH| by which his action miy hi eJsain»'s«?|S - first being that he had the falsest copS«| in his wife, aad was disinclined to 'aBOf." ! ceedings which wo,ald have hidtbesK' of exposing her. On the other hawi, may h.avc said, "I have caught this m 1" 1' ; tho act, and 1 shall expore him; I"!, oaught him in a dastardly crime, and I*I,' show him up and have him-pw"** ; Mr Ehrenfried asks you to take <bi»™SfH view; but, then, why all this d^*?'ts«PHjt posing now, no proceedings WW.^firl'i the remaining three ■weeks, woßldtww be iemark,ablß More remarkable, «"JM}MH| thaA th© fact 'that he had not taker _ ■ , ceedings for two days, but still a diib^ R; only in dogreo. lam sorry to have tt»S. : f? up your attention so long, butUtwopSfflaß ounduct themselves, as these two J^flgg.' have done, and if they are detected■ l"^.Il^^, must bear the onsequeocesin tha I" 0Sl» m-fi'l tribunal; but do not let one tarn upo'l" l_ other, and give the name of crime to s' !| which b-'ta participate iv. Accordio? this man's guilt so let him bepani9b^ t'S|H if you believe the testimony wDicB'»?JB|B adduced before you, I mast respect™ > suomit that he did not commit>'!!?2|pfffl w;tti which he is charged. A nec^fiSM gredient is wanting to prevent tho maining ia d.oubi, and I maintain tw« >: . evidence given for the prosecution :m «m to establish that ingredient, without *>■■ a verdict cannot bo returned ttga"lß' ' prisoner. I theref ore ask you, genue ■ - with confidence, to return a verdict ot . " Not Gouty."

Printed and Published by the JPK«JrietOf.H^ Bbktt, c ; Bymonds-streot. at hu SrS*? 4| Printing Office, Wyndhain-streei In tn^" Tlaoe of AnoUand, Now Zealandi Wednesday Januab? 31 18& '' -

WB^IImLAIFEI7EMIHe BTAfI, JANUARY 31

(Continued from Secoiul Page.)



'Auctions. r MONDAY, NOON. CNKHUKGA. PIAKC?; TOOI.S. POULTRY, &C &C. A BEAUTIFULLY • SITUATED FAMILY RESIDENCE, GREEN HILL-STREBT (the resi dence of the late Captain Symouds), R. 'ARTHUR HAS lieen favoured with instruciiona Irom Mrs Captain Symondu (who ia loav- Ine for the Soutt.) to Bell by public auction, at horresidenoa. Green Hill-atrcet (near to Queen • street Onenunßa, iv chors dlstatca from the Bootcn Churoh). on Mor-Soy next, at 12 o'olock . noon, HER HOUSEHOLD FURNITDRE AND BFFKCTS, oonslBtlns? of-nrawinKTOOin, Din. ing-room. BeS-rooms, r.nd Kitchen t-^rpeis, OUolothTblats, Chin.; and Katthenwaro, Tools, Poullrr. A GOOD PJANO, &C Also, THE FAMILY KKSIDKNGB Of 13 Hoonw THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 8, SHEEP FAIR. Tho undo signed will hold thoir FIRSr ANNUAL SHBEP FAIR ON THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 8. Intending vendors -vrill forward entries not latci than tho Tuesday previous, tho 6tn. HUNTER & HOIAK. FRIDAY, MARCH 30. fi. 0. GREENWOOD, HAS been instructed by the AUCK. LAND HARBOUR BOARD to sell by auotlon, at the Offices ot the Board, Fort-street, On Friday, the SOth March, 1883, at noon. THK LKASE. for a Term ot FIFTY YEARS, qnhient to the provisions of "Tho Harbours Ant 1878 "o£ a toriicn of the Foreshore on the North Bhoio ot tha Auckland Harbour tor the SSSosa ola BUGAKKKWNERY. Conditions ot sale, draft lease, ana plan of fore shore will be on view at the Offices ot the Board. W. S, COCHEANB.] [JAMKB DACKB MONDAY, FEBRUARY 12. THE FREEHOLD OF SIX LARGE ALLOTMENTS AND FOUR COMFORTABLE DWELLING HOUSES. CONQUEST PLACE, PARNELL. THE subscribers bave received inatruo. tlona from the Rev. B. Burrows, Aaoat for the Churoh Missionary Elooioty, to sell by public auction, at tha Land Mart. Fort-street, on Monday. February 12ih, at 12 o'clock, That Valuable Block of FREEHOLD PRO PERTY, situate In Conquest Place, Parnell, opposite the St. Stephen's n'stato, and adjoining Mr Barton Ireland's, subdivided as follows :— Lot 1—126 feet frontage to Conquest Plaoa, by 181 feotdoep (J roods 8 perches), with the comfortable Family Residence tberoon, as occupied by Mr Corbott. Lot 3—X feet frontage to Conquost Place, with Dwelling house thereon, now In tho occupation oJ Mr D'Aroy Twine. Lot i— The House oconpled by Mr Bedford, with 68 feet frcntaga to Ccnqueat Place, Lot 6—Large Allotment, 15 feet frontage to Conquest Pmcs; contains one rood seven perches. liOt B-Comfortablo Cottage, ooonpied by Mr Morgan, with Allotment 85 ft. frontage. Lot B—Large Allotment, containing 2 acres 3 roods 25 perche?, with entrance from Cor-quest Place. . j N.B.— Intending Pnrchaoora are invited to In> . speot the property. Plans are now ready, and can bo obtained at the offices oi SAMUEL COOHRANE fi; SON, Auctioneers. ____JBiaiLAY L; EEBRnAJiY.-2. THE HAYMARKET, FOB SALE, at the Haymatket, on Friday, February 2, at 11 o'olock; An Express Waggon, made by Conslna aiid. Atkin, equal to new, with quiet Horse aud Harnes3 Hoavy-dranKht Golding from Wslkato i Usof al Hacks, ALFRED BUOKLAHD. TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 6. mHE A NNUAL gHEEP W^AIR ~ Will to held at THE REMUERA YARDS, ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 6. Entries to be previous to Thnraday, February 1, ALFRED BUCKLAKD. '■'. TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 6. ' THE REMUEBA SHBEP FAIR. FOR 84LE, at the fiemuera Sheep Fair, on Tuesday, Fob, B, . ■ 1 Knn TWO AND FOUR-TOOTH LIN- IoUO x colN Bwas gQQ AGED BWR3 • • 40Q lAMBS ' ,' . ; gQ TWOTOOTH LINCOLN RAM 3 ALFRED BUCKLAND, TUESDAYS. THE HAYMABKBt SALE OF WOOL, SHEEPSKINS HIDK3 AND TALLOW, each Tuesday, - at 18 o'clock, ALFRED BUOjOiAND, B, TONKS. B. C. CABR. B. D. TONKS FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 2. B. TONKS & CO. WILL SELL, on Friday next, Febru ary 2, at 12 o'olocfc, THE BIGHT TO GRAZE the KLLEESLTE RAOKCOURBE for EIGHT months, fr jm Ist February to Ist October. B, TOHKB, B. 0, OARB, B. D, TONES WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 21. /»/\ ACRES, AVONDALE TOWN- V" SHIP. Adjoining railway station, Fronting v;ii on New North Road. THK PROPERTY OS1 H. WALTON, ESQ, NOW SUBDIVIDED, " -~.,, And will be offered , y, FOX POSITIVB SALE ON THB ABOVE DATE. B. TONKS & DO. *~ TETO-BSDAY, FEBRUARY 1, At 11 o'clock. ■ HOUSEHOLD FTTRKITURE ; AND EFFECTS. THE Subscriber has received instructions Irom Mrs McKenzlo (who Is leaving lor the South) to sell by auction, at her ref-idenoe, Parlifcraeat- street, top cf Corstltutlon Hill, on 'i'hnrtida" texf, at 11 o'ulootc, - , HUB HOUBKHOLD FORMTUBW AKD BFlfifOt'H, coDblstlDg of—Drawinsr-room, UlniDK • rcom, rcl-roarn, and Kitchen jife^X Jfarnltute ai.d Klfeots, &c. '^9Bi GEORGE SIBBIN, .. iffij l i,, fi uclionecr,



FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 2, DURHAM YAEDS. spOK SALE, at the Diithnin Yards, on I? STldny bosi, The woll-? lown Jiaui'o Ra:>er KA*fH:O, by UOadiJhot, HUNTER & NOLAN. WEDNESDAY, FEBSDAB? 14. BXTESSION OF TIMB. STIRLINGWORTH. HIKUTAIA LANJJ SALE. FARMS FROM FLVk"to SIX HUNDRED ACRES. Will too held afGRAHAMSTOWN, THAMES, On WEDNESDAX. February 11, Instead o£ January 23. as previously.announced Lithographs to bo had on Application to tho h Auctioneers. T. W. HICKS 0 N & CO., G.N.L.A., AUCKLAND. TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 6, At 12 o'clock. BY ORDEB OF THli MORTGAGEE, BEDELL'S B X E W E X Y. New North Road. Q. W, BINNBY HAS received instructions to soil bj public auction, nt bis Mart, Queonstroot on Tuesday, February Gth. Nt 12 o'oloolc. The BUIU;ING as It now stands, having i fronUsteof 03 (cot to New North Road and 110 feet to Violet-street, Terras and conditions at Balo. Qovernmont Land Bales. __ ■OUBLIC NOTIFICATION RURAL LANDS loTSe~OPENFOR SELEC TION. LIND DISTRICT OF AUCKLAND. . Crown Lands Offloo, AC' Vnd, Decembor 29,1883. I horoby notify that tho Rural L»ods mon tlonedln tho Schedule hereunder wllboopoi for Selection on THUR3DAY, tha !at cay o February, 1883, D. A, TOLB, Commissioner of Crown Lands. SCHKDULB. COOK COUNTY. PATUTAHI BLOCK. PATUTAHI SURVEY DIBTHICr, Section. Area. Prico. a. b. r. & a. d. 101 1,035 0 0 60210 0 113 100 0 0 200 0 0 111 800 0 0 300 0 0 115 1,000 0 0 500 0 0 11C OSS 0 0 191 0 0 119 !)0S 0 0 718 10 0 122 S3B O'O 109 0 0 123 558 3 0 279 7 6 123A 390 0 0 292 10 0 124 1.0G3 0 0 79" 5 0 125 218 0 0 lbV 10 0 Blook V. 1 729 0 0 361 10 0 2 93S 2 0 JG9 5 0 S 1,300 3 2S 653 10 0 5 K59 2 0 J69 15 0 6 860 0 0 130 0 0 These lands are t itaated about 15 mi'oa fron Glaborno, on the formed miin road to Walroa and on that leading to tho uangaroa village Bite Tae surface soil lo light, testing on marl. Th< country ia a gocd deal broken, bat wlthemal fl»i3 on moat of the i cot lons. The vegotattoi oonEdetß ot (crn, tain. Mid lbs, and a Unti graßS, with patches of mixed bash In tne gulllea WAIMA.TA BLOCK. Waimata Suhvex Disthict. Block. Soc. Area. Prioo. A. V P. & B. d. XI. 1 100 10 490 S 0 VII. 5 6.9 2 12 51>9 12 6 8 Sli ! 0 314 10 0 . 10 311 0 0 311 0 0 VJT. 12 3.2 0 0 231 0 0 VV. 11 SCO 0 0 »N VI!. 17 551 0 0 S4B 5 0 18 1,070 0 20 535 1 3 I<l GGI 0 0 115 0 0 IV. HU 856 0 0 J33 0 0 21 !80 0 0 3SO 0 0 WAIHAtf AND WHAKAONGAONQA BLOODS. PATOTAHI SURVB.It DISTRICf. Block. See. Ares. Price. 1 A. R. P. £ a d "~x!fi. t\ inrfj'T'" ~ms i 6 o XIV. 1) l\ 4331 0 0 1075 6 0 (Hangamn Survoy Diettiot); HAKQABOA SOhVBT DISTPIOT. Block. Sec. Area. Unßet price. /.. H. P. £ 2. 6. J?} 3022 0 0 135S 5 0 X.' 20 60 221 50 12 8 25 liO 0 0 105 0 0 27 61 2 7 80 13 8 28 V>3 332 , lai 18 9 XI. SO 12* 0 30 HI i 8 82 97 0 7 109 3 8 38 li 9 0 33 201 12 3 38 lHj 0 W 193 2 6 39 121 a 20 121 12 C XIV. 23 5^6 0 0 659 6 0 U 2tO 1 28 2fiO 8 3 25 199 0 0 119 6 0 XV. 1 « 123 62 1 9 2 S2 3 29 40 8 0 • 3 h i ;•; Si 11 6 I 30 1 16 45 10 6 6 21 1 7 Bl 18 9 li 40 310 61 1 0 7 I ■; 22G 52 0 0 9 27 0 13 ro 9 1 XV, 11 19 035 21 13 6 12 32 3 SB 87 2 0 13 28 3 0 33 8 9 15 23 1 8 29 2 6 IS 81 0 31 114 0 0 18 2B 0 3 S2 10 6 22 233 23G 233 J1 6 81 177 1 6 22111 3 10 812 0 0 406 0 0 II 178 0 0 353 10 0 12 532 0 0 208 0 0 XVI. 13 722 0 0 £61 0 0 11 139 2 23 12 3 9 15 295 2 33 181 16 1 13 189 0 27 118 1 6 17 812 0 0 203 0 0 18 02(1 0 0 131 10 0 DBSCHIFTION OF LiND3 IN WIIHAU AND Whakaonqaokoa Blocks.—These lands are sit«ate4 on the formed road from Gleborro to Walroa, tho village of Tlniioto being about 24 miles south-west from Uisborne. Tho (mailer seottone, under 200 acres, are agricultural, the others agricultural and pastoral, consisting o( broken rangee, covered with fern and tntn, with a little grass. Patches of bush exist in most ot the 'gulliea, the timber being mixed, but with some titara and rimti. The toll ia light, resting on marl and sandstone. DKBCRIPTIOI* OF LANDS IS THE WAIMATA Block.—These lands aro 18 miles north of Gis borne by a formed road. The general nature of the surface is broken, but with numerous flats suitable for homestead and agricultural pur poses. Tho vegetation Is fern, tutu, acd Other sornb, with a good deal of grass in places. The forest found In most Of tho gullies is Mixed, but with some totals, matai, and other fencing Umbers, Tha soil is generally good. ■ WAiHOA couNry. TABAMABJMA SORVE? DISTRICT. Blook Seo. Arta. Pilce. a. it p. & b. d. V. 7 BJ3 0 0 491 0 0 8 1962 0 0 HBl 0 0 IX. 3 1919 0 0 9ia 10 0 1 20fO 2 4 IC3O 7 6 X. 1 «2 219 536-7 6 2 461 0 Sfl 230 11 6 3 532 2 32 266 7 6 Ebsobipiiok of Lane.—Block V,: Seotions 7 aid 8 broken, boU light Dut fair, a little bnsh for firewood in nuilioa, small flits along the river. Blook 'X.: 3eotions 3 and 4. broken. 801 l light, coverert with high farn and tutn, well watered. Blook X,: Section 1, nndulattog, boU light, well watered, coverfld wi'h high tern and tutu; sections 2 ana 3, undulating and flat, soil light, well watered, civored with blgn fern, tutn, and grats. Xneso lan-Is are si.aate close to the road from Fraserlown to Lako Waitare moana.and aboat ten miles distant from the former. Terms of S»tß, — Oc3-fourth o( nnrohaee money to be paid at time of application, and the balance within one month thereafter, other wire the part of the purchasa mohsr pild by of deposit shall be forfeitid.and tha oontraot for the sale of the land shall henceforward be null and void. Crown Grant fee to be paid on completion of purchase. NoTK.-P!aßEiof all tlm übjva lands may bo seen on application at this office, at the Land Offices, Taurttnpa and Biab'.rne, and at all tho principal Land Offices iv ths Ca'ony, Sswiner Maanines, EeTABLiaHtiO BY SPBOIAI, J^JS^^L -4FPOINTMENTJ Buy ONLY THK 1- - CELEBRATED /^\s. \ -^) SEWING MAOHINBS. Tho Haalest, Simplest, East Made, and Meat Durable. Tho only Bowing Machine whlob. has never beenlbeaten in competition. Sole Agents In New Zealand t SHAKESPBAR AND CO., (Opposite tho M^rtKft)



Business Notices. IH EE AND POTTER, CoAcn Builders, \J{- Grey-street, AnoMa_d.-N.8.: Iron-bark Shafts. Spoke*, Felloes, Blno l am and all fclnda oi Hardwood, at Lowest Market Prlooa. ■»-« OBSON-STKBET STEAM COFMSIS O M£lA'B.-H. P. GIBUO.'JH and CO., Tea, Co'teo and Sploo Meromuua, Whelcsalo nnd Vninlli-Oi-ucers, Cosl.lfivowoofl, ana Produco £"uiers.-wi.P. GIBBOHS find CO., Ilabson- Btroet. Anoltl»n(1 ■ R A 2K IS S. JJ U T U X fe «« *j OAB'IEK. CUWSBAUI'O KJ -H- HENJJKKSON, *" HOUSE, SHIP, SIGN, AND GENERAL [DECORATIVE PAINTER. NO. 8, WYHDn AM-S T BEET, «»r H SKINNEK & SON, W , nUILDKHS, CARPKNTKIIS AND JOINERS, Vui.can Lane. All Brnnchco ot tlio Building Trado oxooutodby Experienced Workmon, Shop I'routs. Oillco Fittings So. |1 DWA E D BAItT LE V, i AROHIIHOT. STICHBURX'd BUILDIKG3, QUKKN-STREET. ]Tj. MOSS.] IW. F, O SULLIVAN F. J. Moss « Co., , HOUSS, LAND, AND E3TATK AGENTS, EHOKTtAND-STnEBr, intoiitUiiK Boyera are rospsotfally Invited to lnsjioot our List of Proportleß. Monoy to Lond st Current Katos oC Intorost. KPT END STOB E, VICTORIA. ST. WEST. JOHN 11. HUGnvca la now pioparod to inpply all kinds ot Grooerlcs at tho lovtrst nrlooH. A Tbial Invited. N.B.—Families waited on for Orders, and Gooqb delivered. Pleaso Note tho Add?eß9— ' JOHN H. HUGHES. Tea Dea?or and Family Grocer. Viotoria-atreet West, noxt Ked Lion Hotel. alTnock bkothers, SOAP AND OiNOLV. MANU FAOIURKRS, COX'S CREEK, MCHMOND. Office 1-rDURHAM-STKKET. AUCKLAND. Cash Purchasers ot Tallow, Wcol, Shtepakini, and Bones. Q BRIDGE CONTRACTORS, BUILDERS, ETO. Tho undenUned, having apodal maohlnery for tho manufaotnro of Bolto, haa aapply of all loncths In aiook at oheapeat r»w»; also. Itoifn; lation Verandah Posts. Iron Tabnlar Iflola Gates, prloe OS Ids, to bo had from T. and S. Morrto &; Co.. Crulckuhank. MlUor ft Co.. and at tho Works. 4< tajTi fcorne-stroet Bolt and Genoral Iron Worka. / rffUHat J ■_! sHfi atASUJ uoew ftJIOQM FAOI'ORSi Utmiosi-Houna-iw, Ptlßaai Warn, Ttaia 11/8 lit* <U». «»OOKBINDINU AND ACCOUNT j_> BOOK FAOIOBY. VIOrORIA-BTREUT WK&T. AUCKLAND, Uno Door above Holland & Butler'?. CHARLES COOPEK, _ote Head of the " Herald" Dspartaont. Bogj to lmorm hia Friends and the Pub'io In general that he has commonotd Builnosa for himself. 0. C. la -now prepared to exaonto Promptly, Cheaply. a»d la tho Bkst fcTjLnt, all classes of UooKßiNOiva and general Bta tlonory. , 3ot M»bs.Jdorti>. f^TBW SKALAND FSSBTS jjs Ucsicffiutsil, ttf A-jteiall? ttariaisd In railum v>bS%. Her so m via Biisa j S?_ I 0 OKA IS, £__fCS3«SaB», ralO COMTRACTORS AND OTHEKS. WELLS BROS., , Devospobt, Limo, Sand, Shell, Ash, Purirl Posts and House Blocks, &c., &c. Contracts niado for tho do livery of Timber, &c, from tho mills to any art of Dovonport Distrlot # AS 83' WELI^S BROS., Carters. Dovonport. mHAILES CARRIAGE AKD DRAY JL g-CTOUV. JAMES MaCKIE, PjROriUETOB, Victoiua-st. East, AUOKLAND, Ropalra of every description In Wood and Iron neatly exoouiod on tho Bhortest notice. Springs made and repairsd. Alwarn on Hsnri—A Urga quantity of Lampa, fiUo Jroribivrk Shafts and bpoko9 ( Rod Hum Fpl loob. and Hobart Town Hardwood. '; N.B.—Country orders ptuotnally attor.dod to. jri b^ t o b^ Ht ii \3T to ROTH'S PUBLIC HOT, COLD. AND SHOWEK B4THB, VIOTOHIA-BTRKBT KABT. CharKO-ONK SHILLIN9. Open all week days from 7 o.m. to B p.m., and SUNDAY MORN INGS from 6 tUI 10 a.m. The -Batn-roema ara all private, and snppliod with every oonven. lence. Turkish towels, IKsh &nd halrbrashM, combs, roaplr^!o^», mt*p% &o. Belcot Bsth rooma (private) for Ladles overy day. at all hours, -lth female attendance, Ono Shtuing and Slxpenoo. Pleaes noto tte address:—Vlotoria strret Knot. aNire the Qreyhonnd Hole), and next tbe Uhe^p Bedding and Furniture Mart, Auckland. N.B.—Barber la Bttoad&nco. TAMES QLARB, Huvlntt returned from. Friendly Islands, wishes respectfully to inform the publlo that he haa STARTED BUSINESS AGAIN IN HIB OLD SHOP OaBTOM-Hot7»iiysTnitßT Wiibt, and will bo most happy to see his old customers, and any new ones who will favour him with their patronage. iU kinds of Yaohts and Bouts bnilt to order on the shortest notice. Boats repaired. N.B.—A Small Slip on the premises. J. OLABW, YACHT AND BOAT BUILDER, sustSm-house-stbbkt wbst, freeman's bay. qaddlk'r y k c. f.~oooper, 277 & 278, upper quben-Btrekl', Kikst Pbizb Auckland Show. 1882. Manufacturer of Evory Description of OARRUGF, GIG, BUGSY, OART. AND PLOUGH fiARN«3B. LodlEß' and GenW Saddles, Paok Saddles, Bsgß, Vivlliiua, Leggings, &c, &c, on hand and made to order) Bridles, Whips, Spurs, BU3,1 Brushes, Klllman's Embrocation, So, Stccplectneo snd Raoo £aidlCß made to order. Evening Con certs. BELKOIIONB ffhOM OPKRAS, SONG?, DUBTo, ETC., ETO, Bvory Person can have these In their own Home by calling on J. HOWDEN, ShortlAnd-st., And Pnrohaslog ono of hla NEW-Y-IMPORTED PIANOS. THE AUCKLAND FORWARDING AND PAIIOBL DKLIVKRY AGRNCY Doaontch Goods ana Parcels of all descriptions to overy part of the Town and Suburbs Cheap Rate, and with guaranteed regularity, The following ere tho Booking Agencies!— A. B. Ladd, Cabinetmaker. .Karangahopelload W, H. Young, Grooor Ponkonby Road K. Blrnle.Baber Aroh Hill J. Reid, Cabinetmaker....Corner of Kyber Pass andSyinondsst. B. Reid, Grocer. Corner of Kybor Pasa and Graf ton Itoad, W. S. CoUlds, Grocer. ; Parnoll a. Heldt, Cabinetmaker No wmarket DELIVERIES :- Town I Hourly. Suburban ill a.m. and S p.m. No 78, Telephone Exchange. nicAi) OFFICE: Nathan's' Boud. Cnstom liouso trout. s ff a n k a k HAS SOU BJiXM a Gnmbei oi tho aims, wWs Tap njady for nso, tn and nownres, At ms Stbam wqbks, vimammiiassssa, m fcisi Shop 'WttiLmusv-eßmn's, Large aoa/ititisa M nvvmiing, Klfistcß, Mi Uovra »J»ffo s?.«fß»ii iv vtoolr.' Vraeartisn 3ron sawad at ahurteat naiiw, ManofßOtooi' en Lsaa _a6 Oompo Pipe. a eiuilor. selbctidß ai Cli-ndolieK. See,, at tab) WaUesle?Hß_eet shop. Oooatrr otdert wiU alwan noalTe bll pramul *ttent!BD. IMcs_ua ta lay v Wntai, So» tfAnmt* on ms ihscovkj Lbad



Public aiottcon. \ U? MRSKJHASRCa «-' /; ?.• FJ 3 H A ?* '•' S»' «i? ■:* Fsaei ;.'e.'-f!f»-'r!-' ■„_ *;!".Siiti"a'«ail OouiSnenWl Chftrtis, Phofci- Sisohio, Glass Stout* WHUTft iiHAU, Colours, OH, VAttMItSIJIBS aroahsa. MtaMfl im'a .taSoca roslvo ana Patent suioata l J:iin*«, 3fi 00L DI ST 8 S~a ill, ffiftitiefi, Vf.asesefi, JBi Picturaß'rainer.ndK(»imslJ»i<satafioo»i,Fa!'es ffmtnaa Jos Cabinet taut O.D.^. Psostrasns bI awry aoswiDtlos la stsai vtsiais Bt!?ja&— r&otoi ana cesoaros. Albnam fiw PhoJiw, Bosaxw, ft;*, &*, ae< OtiS-Oiltnr tK;-;r.v Wwsitfr, •?!'. ; -V:::5 J OftWi:Bt *■?« C.Oi Vi MW>ti» r .iuttoto1 JX-.<flßJfl!iKWi Wi Pi feb. fc»vui« K-nritia ca tend ifio larsect h»ijoS >if the abo«s soofto in sue f,'orth istena ol Sew Esftlanfi. eta s.Ma so esosa» oishik- whole, sal-, or MiteJi o*4«ra «« the- t-iaa* te-reuraWt Jstbm. Bamploe cf Papsrhacglnr:? from opsa stoctiOrof crtirinKl v)ri*i»ko^ sent onaupuin- Mon. Now astflasa So AuoKtaad glionlfl Iwsstct oarutooS c; i'assvUii--.-.,'!-^ ;ui. J. PUiarMil»for« flttlns oj) B'.Blr aev, ;viwM! tlifty Mluflnd tama IMns *!i unit ths msOTS eJ weweafi W, PHRWPPS & SOH,' OIOSISW^ISBSBS'i AUU-ii-' >*- , . TRft DE r ■y;; ■■ .^j •^X "" '°—J M°A R X ' ~~ Hi; O X S A li B. %} 1 Konivwheoled Dob Cart (nonrly aew) 1 Two-whoolod lice Catt (noarly now! 1 Large Ladi's Pbaeton Doable-Beaton Ktiimy Wantocl to PnrohnDP, Donble-eofttofl Hooded _ Buggy. TBI HI! H«»m«KKBT I. Ui, QOTJItN'BTBJSB'r, AUOItiAWU OR CAtK. A»::'.ivan Pku COKOMANDSIi Awo ROMAN BMI'UtB,- Whlls Olovor, Kod Utover, tlsyfeo Clorer, OOW- Brass, Moortaw Vecoue, Stesdovr FortalL Orootod Uocatolll, Itaua, TrofoUuiu InoaraaSTin; (anirlal OlOYeri, FROM AMKIUOA OIKJSOt- Tlinothy, Jteuwokr lanaetw* l?oa Pratenifiil, POTfttty Hay Rye«iiiß», wusttrbw' Breanw. Uookilook. FralrlosrnuH, liattalL. SARLY SSBD PaEll'OKB, AS ]?OLLOWB I- Kiansy, Taylor's Kidney, Canter bnir inukee. Pattarson'« Vlototla. rjLTKR VAHianES—Hobart. Sntton'a M« sum Honom. Sakton's ?lowat Ball, etc ALSO, OeM, Btalsr, Qaraem iind SlOfftsz Mead, OoatU, Klne and Rook Bait, Bran, Sharps, New Zet land B*las. Tow. efcjcou and Hams, BONHDUbT AMD BONHFLOOH o( all Ecrsdea. UIMSB AH» P3IRUVIAW 9UANO, IX» Btt fl KS X X TB* A AIT OS. ff? Jf B A O O C X JL a optician Has n Stook BPBOTAOIiKS AND S¥* QhASBEB of OTory ilesorlptlon^ an nCoarat; Fit QuarantMd. OOM?OOKD MJORO3CXXPIt« AND TKL3E | SOOP^B, PovKxtvl tad Chtss. AH3HOIII UAMUU(!T<SBP, THKUMOMKiHBB, Eukctkio Bst.iw, BArnmiES amd FITTIKOS, Magneto JElcctri? :' ißehincw and 'jModloal Colla. opsra oiiAaaaa bihoouliAE nKti) AND MAiUNS QUASSKS. I'HBODOLITia, CnMPAS3KB, SKXTANTB, Spirit Hydtomotcß, SAeeiuurometeta, Salioometiirt, Arßemtometar*, fee, Ae.,&e, AQUNI BOH TAYLGK'S PATWJ3 BSVniNB MAoeiNun a kxtkap. lagtromeuti and Sowing Mnchln^s repaired. OrPOBiTM tsra Poa* omn. BhOi^l<Uid-«tlWSl!. M W0" Pt4 Q |*ii Jbt Ou n w ii I M 1 GROU~Iiir~LIME, FOB. OALB, SOUTH GATE'S UAHORAK6I HTDItAOtIO QRODNO ROOI9LX LIMB, to sny qoantlty, tor Con orate, Peths, Vloon, Oell&rB, eta (next to stcne flagglcs, IB nn tlvallod lor dnrablllty and hard-«ot>ln« auaUsloa). For tanks and other wet wort it U a Crat-cla«i matariai. B. EBANE, SOLE AGENT, rh3BTOK-lIOOHe-»TB«aT, Land and Ebtate Agents FOR SALE, BY EDWARD WAYTK HOUSE AND LAND AGENT. MOUNT ALiBERT-Gentlem&n's Residence, 10 rooms, outbuilding*. 3 lo 9 aores ; very ctoap. MOUNT ALBKRT—House 10 roome, ontbulld- Inge, 2 acres (near station), £950. VOLCANIC LAND (nt Mount Bden)-91 iwres, 7-roomod llonno, «ro £150 oash, at 7 per onnt, MOtINT ALBBUT (near Railway Station)— 6}aorca voloanlosoll. lnprrats j splendid view. MOUNT ALBKRT (near statlonl-House 10 rooms, 2 aores.—£7oo. HOUSE OF KIQUT ROOMS, Kdon Torraoo. Gaa stove, well, frc, Offorod oheap. MOUNT EDKN (noar Statlonl—Soven-roomod House and Lnrge Allotment, £500. Terms easy, MOUNT EDKN—Horae'4 rooms, £210 VIEW ROAD (Monnl! Kden)—7-roomed HouBO: oonorote cistern, with nearly one acre. OOTTARK and LOT-193 x 160-£2OO, UNKHUN&A-House 8 rooins-fIIOD ONKHUNHA 7-rooitiod House »nd Land, £250, ALLOTMENTS, Seallold Road, Parnell,Rich mood Moont tcdon. etc. MOUNT KDKN, Valley Koad-Honao of 9 large rooms ont hemsps. la. 4p. land. Cheap. SJCAI'IKLD KOAlJ—iilt)uii«mun'B Kcsldonoe oi 8 rooms, larga allotment, every convonlenoe, LEAWINBTOX ROAD - Now Comfortable HoasßH end Lscd, 4!!50 each, OlTl—Capital shop of 6 room?, stable, &c to leaee, ront low. MOUNT ALBERT—IOJ aores and Hooao. £500. MOUNT ALB tßT—Lease of 62 aores and I-lonses. &o. Cheap, HLLWRSLIK-Houao. 7 rooms, and land, £150. PHNBONBY—Houses ot 6 and 11 room?, PAPATOITOI-Fine Houbb and 20 uoree. FARMS at Cambrldgu, Pakerlmw, Sc. KD. WAYTB, House and Land Asont, \\f O S B O^ X S E, VT •' Fstite, Laud, and General Commls lon ARcnt, 81, Qacen-atreet, Anoklacd. MONEY fO LEND on Mortgage or any bum required, on terms to suit borrowera Interest illwodon monies plaoed on my hands till invented.—W, V. Steven..ln veetins Anoat, 187, (jntcn-gtreet £10 to £1,000. %TICTOKIAN LOAN AKD DISCOUNT V AOItNCY, HIGH-STRKfIiT, AUCKLAND (OPPOSITE CITY COUNCIL OFFICES). Money advanoa bora £10 to £1000 on Personal Security, Do da o( Proporty, Sharef, &o. ReDaymontf) oao bo made In Instalments ot One UHiixma pkb Wkbk for each Pound bor rowed, or In ny way to suit borrowers. Communications Confidential. Post OgFioic ApdhibsS i Box 90, AuoWand. ■j^XCHANGE ON NEW ITOKK AND ff»j LONDON, in sums to suit. FOR PAIiW BY ARNOLD, BINWS, AND CO.. -Corner of Cantom hiouaa and Fort aireetg. UIVEV I'O LKJND, in large and small lums, at curront rates o£ interest. Apply to PETER OLIPHANT, ." Solicitor, High-stroot. M"~" ONEY TO LEND, ou Heal astato, In sums of *50 and upward?, at the cur rent rates ot Interest —Apply Win, S, Goohrano, U5, N. Z,j Jnßm-anoa HulldlnHß, or bamuel roshtsna an* tfon, yort-Btraet. M~~ OJSEY TO LEND on Mortgage,at Flrat-cIBBB Preih'nld Securities. WM. CObKWAN, Solicitor. Corner of Quotm and Sbortland-atreets, ONEY TO LEND, in large or small Duron, at usual rates of Interest, CONHKLL & COOPBB, KoJlcltore. Vujcan Lone. '