That there may be temporary general legislation, and that legislation because it is temporary does not of necessity make it special, is well laid down in Railway Co. v. Horstman, 72 Ohio St., 93, the second syllabus being:
“A temporary act may be either general or special; and an act of a general nature which operates uniformly throughout the state and upon every individual corporation of the classes therein defined, but which is by its terms limited in operation to a specified period of time is a temporary general statute.”
The conclusion, therefore, is inevitable that this statute is general in its nature, though it may- be temporary in its operation. The question then is: Does it operate uniformly throughout the state? There is no intimation that it does not do so, either in the act itself, or to be adduced from those facts of which the court may take judicial notice. It may be that there are some counties and other divisions not affected by the floods referred to in the act, but this does not appear either upon the face of the act or from any-other fact before the court of which the court may-take notice.

### Language ###
English

### Assessment ###
The text mentions a key legal distinction about temporary acts, with a specific case reference that could be queried.

### Query ###
Tell me the name of the court case defining temporary general legislation in Ohio.
Tell me the name of the court case defining temporary general legislation in Ohio.