7.86 We read Brazil's statement of available evidence,  insofar as Brazil's export subsidy claims are
concerned, to refer to each of the three challe nged United States export subsidy programmes as they
relate to upland cotton and other eligible agricultural products.
7.87 It is not entirely clear to us th at the United States challenges the adequacy  of the statement of
available evidence in terms of evidence with respect to the "existence" or "nature" of these alleged
subsidies with respect to any product other than upla nd cotton.  However, to the extent that the United
States makes this challenge, we see nothing in the text of Article 4.2 of the SCM Agreement  that
would necessarily  require Brazil to identify specifically or  explicitly the products for which the
programmes were provided, the amounts provided, or indicate that they existed beyond upland cotton,
as the United States contends.149  This would have fallen within  the scope of the export credit
guarantee "programmes" already identified by Brazil.

### Language ###
English

### Assessment ###
The text discusses whether Brazil needs to specify products in their export subsidy claims, so we could ask about product identification requirements.

### Query ###
Does Brazil need to specifically identify products when filing export subsidy claims?
Does Brazil need to specifically identify products when filing export subsidy claims?