Bug 97278 [code manipulation] Add constructor from superclass proposes wrong constructor
RC1 public abstract class A<T> { public T fT; public A(T ft) { super(); // TODO Auto-generated constructor stub fT = ft; } } class Sub<E> extends A<String> { public Sub(String ft) { super(ft); // TODO Auto-generated constructor stub } } - run add constructor from superclass inside sub observe: the dialog offeres Object(), however generate a default constructor results in a compile error since A doesn't provide a default constructor.
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/wizards/NewTypeWizardPage.java
fSuperInterfacesDialogField.setEnabled(canBeModified);
	}
	
	/**
	 * Sets 'Add comment' checkbox. The value set will only be used when creating source when
	 * the comment control is enabled (see {@link #enableCommentControl(boolean)}
	 * 
	 * @param doAddComments if <code>true</code>, comments are added.
	 * @param canBeModified if <code>true</code> check box is
	 * editable; otherwise it is read-only.
	 * 	@since 3.1
	 */	
	public void setAddComments(boolean doAddComments, boolean canBeModified) {
		fAddCommentButton.setSelection(doAddComments);
		fAddCommentButton.setEnabled(canBeModified);
	}
	
	/**
	 * Sets to use the 'Add comment' checkbox value. Clients that use the 'Add comment' checkbox
	 * additionally have to enable the control. This has been added for backwards compatibility.
	 * 
	 * @param useAddCommentValue if <code>true</code>, 
	 * 	@since 3.1
	 */	
	public void enableCommentControl(boolean useAddCommentValue) {
		fUseAddCommentButtonValue= useAddCommentValue;
	}
	
	
	/**