Bug 97278 [code manipulation] Add constructor from superclass proposes wrong constructor
RC1 public abstract class A<T> { public T fT; public A(T ft) { super(); // TODO Auto-generated constructor stub fT = ft; } } class Sub<E> extends A<String> { public Sub(String ft) { super(ft); // TODO Auto-generated constructor stub } } - run add constructor from superclass inside sub observe: the dialog offeres Object(), however generate a default constructor results in a compile error since A doesn't provide a default constructor.
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/wizards/NewTypeWizardPage.java
return comment;
				}
			} catch (CoreException e) {
				JavaPlugin.log(e);
			}
		}
		return null;
	}
	/**
	 * @deprecated Use getTypeComment(ICompilationUnit, String)
	 */
	protected String getTypeComment(ICompilationUnit parentCU) {
		if (StubUtility.doAddComments(parentCU.getJavaProject()))
			return getTypeComment(parentCU, StubUtility.getLineDelimiterUsed(parentCU));
		return null;
	}
	/**
	 * @deprecated Use getTemplate(String,ICompilationUnit,int)
	 */
	protected String getTemplate(String name, ICompilationUnit parentCU) {
		return getTemplate(name, parentCU, 0);
	}
		
	
	/**
	 * Returns the string resulting from evaluation the given template in
	 * the context of the given compilation unit. This accesses the normal
	 * template page, not the code templates. To use code templates use
	 * <code>constructCUContent</code> to construct a compilation unit stub or
	 * getTypeComment for the comment of the type.