Bug 74580 formatting for condition quick assists
3.1 M2 test pass The formatting of conditionals modified by the new quick assists is misleading. Consider the following: if (c1) { one(); } else if (c2) { two(); } else { three(); } translates into: if (!c1) if (c2) { two(); } else { three(); } else { one(); } which is correct, but it is barely visible from the formatting that the last else clause belongs to the first if statement. I would expect this (with or without the braces): if (!c1) if (c2) { two(); } else { three(); } else { one(); }
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/AdvancedQuickAssistProcessor.java
return false;
		}
		IfStatement ifStatement = (IfStatement) coveringStatement;
		if (ifStatement.getElseStatement() != null) {
			return false;
		}
		
		if (!(ifStatement.getThenStatement() instanceof ContinueStatement)) {
			return false;
		}
		
		Block loopBlock = null;
		if ((ifStatement.getParent() instanceof Block) && (ifStatement.getParent().getParent() instanceof ForStatement)) {
			loopBlock = (Block) ifStatement.getParent();
		} else if ((ifStatement.getParent() instanceof Block)
				&& (ifStatement.getParent().getParent() instanceof WhileStatement)) {
			loopBlock = (Block) ifStatement.getParent();
		} else {
			return false;
		}
		if (resultingCollections == null) {
			return true;
		}
		
		
		AST ast = coveringStatement.getAST();
		ASTRewrite rewrite = ASTRewrite.create(ast);
		
		Expression inversedExpression = getInversedBooleanExpression(ast, rewrite, ifStatement.getExpression());
		IfStatement newIf = ast.newIfStatement();