Bug 20633 inner "new interface" in a class - why option "static"? [code manipulation]
When you add an inner interface to a class or interface, the "new interface" dialog offers a checkbox "static". Wether an inner interface is static or not does not make a bit of a difference. So the main effect that checkbox is likely to have is, it confuses Java-newcomers. "Could you please tell me what this decision I have to make means?" (Nothing.) Get rid of that checkbox.
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/wizards/NewTypeWizardPage.java
fTypeNameStatus= typeNameChanged();
			fSuperClassStatus= superClassChanged();			
			fieldName= PACKAGE;
		} else if (field == fEnclosingTypeDialogField) {
			fEnclosingTypeStatus= enclosingTypeChanged();
			fTypeNameStatus= typeNameChanged();
			fSuperClassStatus= superClassChanged();				
			fieldName= ENCLOSING;
		} else if (field == fEnclosingTypeSelection) {
			updateEnableState();
			boolean isEnclosedType= isEnclosingTypeSelected();
			if (!isEnclosedType) {
				if (fAccMdfButtons.isSelected(PRIVATE_INDEX) || fAccMdfButtons.isSelected(PROTECTED_INDEX)) {
					fAccMdfButtons.setSelection(PRIVATE_INDEX, false);
					fAccMdfButtons.setSelection(PROTECTED_INDEX, false); 
					fAccMdfButtons.setSelection(PUBLIC_INDEX, true);
				}
				if (fOtherMdfButtons.isSelected(fStaticMdfIndex)) {
					fOtherMdfButtons.setSelection(fStaticMdfIndex, false);
				}
			}
			fAccMdfButtons.enableSelectionButton(PRIVATE_INDEX, isEnclosedType);
			fAccMdfButtons.enableSelectionButton(PROTECTED_INDEX, isEnclosedType);
			fOtherMdfButtons.enableSelectionButton(fStaticMdfIndex, isEnclosedType);
			fTypeNameStatus= typeNameChanged();
			fSuperClassStatus= superClassChanged();
			fieldName= ENCLOSINGSELECTION;
		} else if (field == fTypeNameDialogField) {
			fTypeNameStatus= typeNameChanged();
			fieldName= TYPENAME;