Bug 26272 Add _$ to list of prefixes for field getter/setter creation [code manipulation]
A common convention is to use _ for instance variables and _$ for static instance variables. Although _ will be stripped by default, it would be useful if _$ was also in the list. Of course, this is settable for individual users (which I've already done) but since it is not an uncommon coding convention (and won't harm anyone in general if present) then I would vote for it to be added to the getter/setter generation prefixes.
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/PreferenceConstants.java
public static final String EDITOR_DEFAULT_HOVER= "defaultHover"; 
	/**
	 * A named preference that controls if segmented view (show selected element only) is turned on or off.
	 * <p>
	 * Value is of type <code>Boolean</code>.
	 * </p>
	 */
	public static final String EDITOR_SHOW_SEGMENTS= "org.eclipse.jdt.ui.editor.showSegments"; 
	/**
	 * A named preference that controls if the Java code assist gets auto activated.
	 * <p>
	 * Value is of type <code>Boolean</code>.
	 * </p>
	 */
	public final static String CODEASSIST_AUTOACTIVATION= "content_assist_autoactivation"; 
	/**
	 * A name preference that holds the auto activation delay time in milli seconds.
	 * <p>
	 * Value is of type <code>Int</code>.
	 * </p>
	 */
	public final static String CODEASSIST_AUTOACTIVATION_DELAY= "content_assist_autoactivation_delay"; 
	/**
	 * A named preference that controls if code assist contains only visible proposals.
	 * <p>
	 * Value is of type <code>Boolean</code>. if <code>true<code> code assist only contains visible members. If 
	 * <code>false</code> all members are included.
	 * </p>
	 */
	public final static String CODEASSIST_SHOW_VISIBLE_PROPOSALS= "content_assist_show_visible_proposals";