Bug 74580 formatting for condition quick assists
3.1 M2 test pass The formatting of conditionals modified by the new quick assists is misleading. Consider the following: if (c1) { one(); } else if (c2) { two(); } else { three(); } translates into: if (!c1) if (c2) { two(); } else { three(); } else { one(); } which is correct, but it is barely visible from the formatting that the last else clause belongs to the first if statement. I would expect this (with or without the braces): if (!c1) if (c2) { two(); } else { three(); } else { one(); }
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/AdvancedQuickAssistProcessor.java
}
	private static ArrayList getUnwrappedStatements(Statement body) {
		ArrayList statements = new ArrayList();
		if (body instanceof Block) {
			for (Iterator I = ((Block) body).statements().iterator(); I.hasNext();) {
				Statement statement = (Statement) I.next();
				statements.add(statement);
			}
		} else {
			statements.add(body);
		}
		return statements;
	}
	private boolean getInverseConditionProposals(IInvocationContext context, ASTNode covering,
			Collection resultingCollections) {
		ArrayList coveredNodes = getFullyCoveredNodes(context);
		if (coveredNodes.isEmpty()) {
			return false;
		}
		
		final AST ast = covering.getAST();
		final ASTRewrite rewrite = ASTRewrite.create(ast);
		
		boolean hasChanges= false;
		for (Iterator I = coveredNodes.iterator(); I.hasNext();) {
			ASTNode covered = (ASTNode) I.next();
			if (!(covered instanceof Expression)) {
				continue;
			}
			Expression coveredExpression = (Expression) covered;