#N canvas 213 152 1171 642 10;
#X obj 173 391 outlet~;
#X obj 117 253 bmod~ 0-\$1;
#X obj 183 253 bmod~ 1-\$1;
#X obj 249 253 bmod~ 2-\$1;
#X obj 315 253 bmod~ 3-\$1;
#X obj 402 272 bmod~ 4-\$1;
#X obj 468 272 bmod~ 5-\$1;
#X obj 174 296 +~;
#X obj 306 299 +~;
#X obj 459 318 +~;
#X obj 174 315 +~;
#X obj 174 334 +~;
#X obj 372 272 cos~;
#X obj 306 272 cos~;
#X obj 240 272 cos~;
#X obj 174 272 cos~;
#X obj 525 291 cos~;
#X obj 459 291 cos~;
#X obj 194 353 r \$1-deviation;
#X obj 173 372 *~ 1;
#X text 190 182 Note that the standard deviation here actually isn't
accurate. But I think it's less confusing to have it scaled the same
as the piecewise linear case \, resulting in the same total span. I
think the point here is that you want the shape to be smoother.;
#X connect 1 1 15 0;
#X connect 2 1 14 0;
#X connect 3 1 13 0;
#X connect 4 1 12 0;
#X connect 5 1 17 0;
#X connect 6 1 16 0;
#X connect 7 0 10 0;
#X connect 8 0 10 1;
#X connect 9 0 11 1;
#X connect 10 0 11 0;
#X connect 11 0 19 0;
#X connect 12 0 8 1;
#X connect 13 0 8 0;
#X connect 14 0 7 1;
#X connect 15 0 7 0;
#X connect 16 0 9 1;
#X connect 17 0 9 0;
#X connect 18 0 19 1;
#X connect 19 0 0 0;
