whats the total number of hs in:
translated from the hebrew, the photograph was published with this caption beneath it  notice the empty holes where they edited out the women in the room? apparently since publishing photographs of women is apparently not permitted in their backward, misogynist “newspaper” they had to be removed from this moment in history. so although the women in the photograph were actually named in the caption, they had someone take the time to physically sit and photoshop the u. s. secretary of state and our director of counterterrorism out of this historically significant photograph just because they are female.
also, although the caption makes note that the photograph was edited to have a document obscured, they chose not to mention editing out people, even though they are publishing the admonition that the photo is not to be “manipulated in any way”.
now just to be clear, i feel it is necessary to point out that this is not even a paper that is published in the barbaric and backward middle east. this “newspaper” is based right here in america…in brooklyn, new york.
rabbi jason miller of jewish week in his article on the subject (click here) explains the publication’s “reasoning” by writing that they “will not intentionally include any images of women in the paper because it could be considered sexually suggestive,” but he also points out that from his viewpoint the altered image violates a central tenet of the jewish faith, “der tzitung edited hillary clinton out of the photo, thereby changing history. to my mind, this act of censorship is actually a violation of the jewish legal principle of gneivat daat (deceit).”
pesonally, i fail to see how our secretary of state sitting there looking deeply concerned and another woman peeking out from behind a man is in any way “sexually suggestive”. in case you need a reminder of what the actual photograph looks like…
i wonder…what did these misogynistic men at der tzitung do when golda meir (bio) was the prime minister of israel??
additional reading:
______________________________________________________________________
edit - posted at 4:30 p.m. on 5/9/2011 -
due to the attention this issue has been getting, di tzeitung has sent out a prepared statement. here is their response:.source:
user
In the text, there are one hundred and eleven "h"s.
assistant