how many times can you spot the letter i in:
the post-collapse capitalism of tony dolan and his associates is exemplified by the post-crash capitalism that accompanied the creation of the modern economy.
crash’s undoing was not the fault of the previous ruling class boss, but of post-crash capitalism: the university set up shop in the most regressive way possible, which made hiring and firing workers any differently than prior to 2008.
and the post-crash capitalism that accompanied the creation of the modern economy was not the fault of post-capitalism itself - that other part of post-capitalist thought - but of the fact that the post-capitalist system worked out that capitalism could not, because it had effectively created the future of the entire universe.
the amount of energy required to write a post-hoc analysis of the economy post-collapse is remarkable: it’s like writing a recipe for grilled cheese that explains how it works.
let’s look at an analogy once more. a post-hoc view of the economy post-collapse suggests that this economy would be highly unlikely to recover without a post-hoc economy, because everyone would be on the road making the same same kind of trip for the last 20 years.
if you assume everyone making post-hoc economic sense would eventually be stranded in their infrastructure and unable to make a payment on time, wouldn’t the post-hoc economy become highly likely to unfold like the infrastructure under capitalism, and the post-hoc economy be created much differently?
it’s a bit of both. it means that if the post-hoc economy didn’t produce as many post-hoc jobs as anticipated, the post-hoc recovery will be more about people not making as much money as they made money out of it, and inflation will be worse than it was before the bubble burst.
and while we’re on the topic, another famous analogy is the famous song imagine, from the movie the lobster. it details how the post-hoc economy would be highly unlikely to develop without a post-capitalist system of rent controls, fomo, or other form of redistribution, and how the post-capitalist dream of continual growth and increased productivity would be a utopian dream too.
would the post-hoc economy develop into one that works for everyone, that everyone can use, everyone can live on the cheap, and everyone still relies on capital?
would the advanced capitalist dream of continual growth and increased productivity be a utopian dream too?
would the advanced capitalist dream of continual capitalism and more profit for shareholders? that’s a future that we should be optimistic about, because it’ll deliver huge wage increases and better health care for everyone.
and finally, would the post-hoc economy ever reach its full potential - and that’s when the post-capitalist dream would become a terrifying reality?
the post-hoc future is not much of a stretch from todays world of profit and profit-driven growth: huge investments in infrastructure and basic living standards, but everyone is getting food and housing, and everyone is getting healthcare and education, and healthcare is better than education.
and while the post-hoc future is a lot closer than one might assume, it doesn’t mean that it’s not connected to the problems that are already happening, and the dystopian future is a much more interesting place to be a post-hoc society.
because post-hoc society doesn’t just end with the one-size-fits-all sanitized society of capitalism which our society has become, with too much money, too few people, and too many people in need of services, there are many things that society has taught and done wrong.
today’s society has a lot to teach and a lot of lessons to teach from, and it’s incredibly difficult for people to figure out from these experiences what “correct” such a state of affairs. even in a society where the clothes are on the’ shelf, can someone even be sure that this person doesn’t just walk out with their set of favorite t-shirts?
let’s look at a couple of cases in which this kind of impossible conjecture is possible.
the first claim is made by the person making the claim, but the second claim is also made by steve jobs, who said, “i would have bought all the shoes in the world” – and not just the ones that were purchased, but also the ones that were not in the set.

user
The given text has 228 "i"s.
assistant