can you count the letter "o" in:
european football chiefs are set to consider abandoning a champions league legacy spot benefiting top premier league teams as key talks are staged over the next week.
a compromise agreement between powerbrokers is seen as inevitable before the controversial post-2024 plan is set in stone at a uefa summit on may 10. some early supporters of the original plan to add two extra places based on historic performance rather than that season's league finish now appear open to adding just one.
among those lobbying hard behind the scenes for a pushback against the sweeping overhaul on coefficient places is the european leagues organisation. mid-ranking top-tier teams and fan groups across europe oppose current changes that they say would favour the wealthiest clubs. even under proposals to abandon leap-frogging, a premier league team such as manchester united or tottenham would have more chance than the likes of west ham of qualifying if they finished fifth or won the fa cup.
uefa's club competitions committee will meet on may 10 and there is some acceptance within the organisation that formal proposals for approval at the executive committee which meets later that day in vienna could change.
giving two of the four new entries in a 36-team league based on historical record has been supported by the european club association, both before some of its officials left for the super league and since. but it rankles with clubs outside the elite, with smaller premier league teams and eintracht frankfurt speaking out against the plans.
last month, telegraph sport disclosed how proposed changes could see the fa cup winners potentially qualify for the champions league under the coefficient system.
from 2024, the champions league will switch from a 32-team, eight-group system to a 36-team single league table in its first round. the “swiss model” will add 100 more games per season to the competition. the clubs will play 10 group-stage games against opponents determined by a seeding system.
user
I found one hundred and twenty-three "o"s in the provided passage.
assistant