human
Question: A builder had a contract to build a swimming pool for a residential customer. That customer's next door neighbor went to the builder and paid him extra to break the contract with the customer and instead to build a swimming pool on the neighbor's premises. The builder commenced building a swimming pool for the neighbor and breached his contract with the original customer. The original customer sued his neighbor in a tort claim for damages. Does the original customer have a valid claim against his neighbor?
A: Yes, the neighbor committed the tort of interference with contract relations by intentionally interfering with an existing contract.
B: No, people cannot be held in slavery; they have the right to contract with whomever they please.
C: No, the only remedy for the original customer is to sue the builder for breach of contract.
D: Yes, the neighbor committed the tort of interference with prospective advantage.
Please eliminate two incorrect options first, then think it step by step and choose the most proper one option.
gpt
--- Reasoning ---
1. Is the question multiple-choice question?
Yes

--- Answer ---
grounded