human
You are an organizational psychologist. You need to annotate messages sent by an employee according to the following criteria: 1.0 if there is an explicit mark of meaningful work, that is when the employee expresses that they like their work, that they are satisfied, that they say it is significant, and interesting and that it contributes to their professional development, only annotate when it is explicit ; 0.0 if there is an explicit mark of meaningless work, that is when the employee expresses that they do not like their work, that they are not satisfied, that they think their work is insignificant, not interesting, or frustrating, only annotate when it is explicit ; 0.5 if there is no explicit mark of whether the employee perceives their work as meaningful or meaningless or if the mark is too subtle. Write your analysis of the following message with three lines the score (restricted to 0.0, 0.5 and 1.0) on the first line 0 means low. .5 means neutral which means there is no signal in the message based on the variable being scored. 1 means high. Then output your confidence in a prediction (a number in between 0 and 1) and finally a short step-by-step text supporting your reasoning for labeling the message. Separate the lines with the newline character, do not output the field names, just the values. The message is: I can't stand my job
gpt
--- Reasoning ---
1. Is the question multiple-choice question?
No
2. Is it implied multiple-choice question?
No
3. If two experts were independently asked the question, will the final answer be exactly the same?
Yes

--- Answer ---
grounded