title: Taxation in Brazil
text: # Taxation in Brazil
  
  Part of a series on :
  
  Taxation :
  
  An aspect of fiscal policy :
  
  Policies
  
  Government revenue
  
  Property tax equalization
  
  Tax revenue
  
  Non-tax revenue
  
  Tax law
  
  Tax bracket
  
  Flat tax
  
  Tax threshold
  
  Exemption
  
  Credit
  
  Deduction
  
  Tax shift
  
  Tax cut
  
  Tax holiday
  
  Tax amnesty
  
  Tax advantage
  
  Tax incentive
  
  Tax reform
  
  Tax harmonization
  
  Tax competition
  
  Tax withholding
  
  Double taxation
  
  Representation
  
  Unions
  
  Medical savings account :
  
  Economics
  
  General Theory
  
  Price effect
  
  Excess burden
  
  Tax incidence
  
  Laffer curve
  
  Optimal tax
  
  Theories
  
  Optimal capital income taxation
  
  Distribution of Tax
  
  Tax rate
  
  Flat
  
  Progressive
  
  Regressive
  
  Proportional :
  
  Collection
  
  Revenue service
  
  Revenue stamp
  
  Tax assessment
  
  Taxable income
  
  Tax lien
  
  Tax refund
  
  Tax shield
  
  Tax residence
  
  Tax preparation
  
  Tax investigation
  
  Tax shelter
  
  Tax collector
  
  Private tax collection
  
  Tax farming :
  
  Noncompliance
  
  General
  
  Tax avoidance
  
  Repatriation tax avoidance
  
  Tax evasion
  
  Tax resistance
  
  Tax shelter
  
  Smuggling
  
  Black market
  
  Unreported employment
  
  Corporate
  
  Tax inversion
  
  Transfer mispricing
  
  Base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS)
  
  Double Irish
  
  Dutch Sandwich
  
  Single Malt
  
  CAIA/Green Jersey
  
  Locations
  
  Tax havens
  
  Corporate havens
  
  Offshore financial centres (OFCs)
  
  Offshore magic circle
  
  Conduit and sink OFCs
  
  Financial centres
  
  Financial Secrecy Index
  
  Major examples
  
  Ireland as a tax haven
  
  Ireland v Commission
  
  Leprechaun economics
  
  Liechtenstein tax affair
  
  Luxembourg Leaks
  
  Offshore Leaks
  
  Paradise Papers
  
  Panama Papers
  
  Swiss Leaks
  
  United States as a tax haven
  
  Panama as a tax haven :
  
  Types
  
  Direct
  
  Indirect
  
  Per unit
  
  Ad valorem
  
  Aviation
  
  Airport improvement
  
  Landing
  
  Solidarity
  
  Capital gains
  
  Expatriation
  
  Consumption
  
  Departure
  
  Hotel
  
  Sales
  
  Stamp
  
  Television
  
  Tourist
  
  Value-added
  
  Dividend
  
  Environmental tax
  
  Carbon
  
  Landfill
  
  Natural resources consumption
  
  Severance
  
  Steering
  
  Stumpage
  
  Excise
  
  Alcohol
  
  Cigarette
  
  Fat
  
  Meat
  
  Sin
  
  Sugary drink
  
  Tobacco
  
  General
  
  Georgist
  
  Gift
  
  Gross receipts
  
  Hypothecated
  
  Income
  
  Inheritance (estate)
  
  Land value
  
  Luxury
  
  Payroll
  
  Pigouvian
  
  Property
  
  Single
  
  Surtax
  
  Turnover
  
  Use
  
  User charge/fee
  
  Congestion
  
  Fuel
  
  Road/GNSS
  
  Toll
  
  Vehicle miles traveled
  
  Corporate profit
  
  Excess profits
  
  Windfall
  
  Negative (income)
  
  Wealth :
  
  International
  
  Financial transaction tax
  
  Currency transaction tax
  
  European Union Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB)
  
  Global minimum corporate tax rate
  
  Tobin tax
  
  Spahn tax
  
  Tax equalization
  
  Tax treaty
  
  Permanent establishment
  
  Transfer pricing
  
  European Union FTT
  
  Foreign revenue rule :
  
  Trade
  
  Custom
  
  Duty
  
  Tariff
  
  Import
  
  Export
  
  Tariff war
  
  Free trade
  
  Free-trade zone
  
  Trade agreement
  
  ATA Carnet :
  
  Research
  
  Academic
  
  Mihir A. Desai
  
  Dhammika Dharmapala
  
  James R. Hines Jr.
  
  Ronen Palan
  
  Joel Slemrod
  
  Gabriel Zucman
  
  Advocacy groups
  
  Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP)
  
  Oxfam (UK)
  
  Tax Foundation (US)
  
  Tax Justice Network (TJN)
  
  Tax Policy Center (US) :
  
  Religious
  
  Church tax
  
  Eight per thousand
  
  Teind
  
  Tithe
  
  Fiscus Judaicus
  
  Leibzoll
  
  Temple tax
  
  Tolerance tax
  
  Jizya
  
  Kharaj
  
  Khums
  
  Nisab
  
  Zakat :
  
  By country
  
  All Countries
  
  List of countries by tax rates
  
  Tax revenue to GDP ratio
  
  Tax rates in Europe
  
  Individual Countries
  
  Albania
  
  Algeria
  
  Argentina
  
  Armenia
  
  Australia
  
  Azerbaijan
  
  Bangladesh
  
  Bhutan
  
  Brazil
  
  Bulgaria
  
  BVI
  
  Canada
  
  China
  
  Colombia
  
  Croatia
  
  Denmark
  
  Finland
  
  France
  
  Germany
  
  Greece
  
  Hong Kong
  
  Iceland
  
  India
  
  Indonesia
  
  Iran
  
  Ireland
  
  Israel
  
  Italy
  
  Japan
  
  Kazakhstan
  
  Lithuania
  
  Malta
  
  Morocco
  
  Namibia
  
  Netherlands
  
  New Zealand
  
  Norway
  
  Pakistan
  
  Palestine
  
  Peru
  
  Philippines
  
  Poland
  
  Portugal
  
  Russia
  
  South Africa
  
  Sri Lanka
  
  Sweden
  
  Switzerland
  
  Taiwan
  
  Tanzania
  
  United Arab Emirates
  
  United Kingdom
  
  United States
  
  Uruguay :
  
  Business portal
  
   Money portal :
  
  vte :
  
  Taxation in Brazil is complex, with over sixty forms of tax. Historically, tax rates were low and tax evasion and avoidance were widespread. The 1988 Constitution called for an enhanced role of the State in society, requiring increased tax revenue. In 1960, and again between 1998 and 2004, efforts were made to make the collection system more efficient. Tax revenue gradually increased from 13.8% of GDP in 1947 to 37.4% in 2005. Tax revenue has become quite high by international standards, but without realising commensurate social benefit. More than half the total tax is in the regressive form of taxes on consumption.
  
  ## Considerations on taxes in Brazil
  
  The Brazilian tax system is a legacy of the Empire, a period that was initially focused on taxes on imports. It had its first significant change only with the Constitution of 1934, when internal taxes on products began to gain projection. In 1960 a reform in order to increase the storage capacity of the state and increase the economic efficiency of the system was introduced. After 1960, alterations were made only in the sense of raising the storage capacity and reduce the degree of distribution of taxes between the federal entities. The end result is that the system is caught in a vicious circle, where tax rates are high and taxes are created. The Brazilian tax reality is notoriously complex, bringing a huge financial cost to the taxpayer, and also causing the constant insecurity of being or not complying with all obligations required by the tax authorities.
  
  The site IBPT – Brazilian Institute of Tax Planning – includes data for 2006 that demonstrate the existence of about 61 taxes levied in Brazil, including taxes, fees and contributions. The system is further overloaded by the huge amount of rules governing the tax system, supplementary laws, ordinary laws, decrees, orders, instructions. There are over 3,000 standards in effect, and the cost that companies have to comply with ancillary obligations is about 1% of their turnover. Those human needs for which the state is responsible, can only be met from the collection of taxes. Moreover, the existence of tax collection is essential for the organized state to maintain itself.
  
  ## General considerations on the national tax structure
  
  The real growth of federal revenues grew more quickly between 1998 and 2004. Nevertheless, the differences noted throughout that period are too sharp to be explained only by higher rates. The additional variable used to explain the recent behavior of the collection, where successive records are announced, is the surveillance effort, which was significantly increased over the last ten years. During that period there was a move towards to raise the efficiency of the supervisory structure through increases in infrastructure, personnel and new laws.
  
  Revenue gains with increases in existing rates are potentially higher than those that would occur with the creation of new taxes. One of the Brazilian government's objectives was, in recent years, raising revenue to reduce the public deficit, with the exchange of more complex taxes by less complex collection and can be cited as an example of this strategy the creation of the CPMF, producing significant gains. Additional gains from such exchange of taxes are obtained by more effective surveillance for less complex in terms of tax collection.
  
  It can be seen that the level of effort made by the federal government in order to increase tax revenue, was not negligible in recent years. The increase in the number of registered companies in the outstanding debt shows the growing work of the Attorney General of the National Treasury. There is a direct relationship between revenues and the balance in charge, indicating a high degree of importance of the efforts made by the authorities in the audit.
  
  ## Tax policy and social function tribute
  
  It should be stressed how aloof are individuals before tax levies. The story of all time, is filled with expressions of displeasure about the state initiative to make tax releases, mainly because, in purely arithmetical terms, the payment of taxes produces impoverishment of the taxpayer. On the other hand, that same taxpayer is not always pleased with the way the state manages the earned financial resources. Brazil is an economy with low tax tradition, where evasion and avoidance are not suppressed with the same intensity observed in other countries with more solid tax tradition.
  
  The relationship between the state and the taxpayer has been characterized for a long time as a relationship of power and coercion. In constitutional terms, the highlights are the principles that seek to delimit the state action. This action falls within the context of tax policy. The tax policy, although it consists of tax collection instrument necessarily need not result in imposition and may have tax and extrafiscal character. It is understood as fiscal policy, taxation of activities carried out with the purpose of raising money, or transferring money from the private to the public coffers. The state just wants to get funding. Extrafiscal policy through the tax legislation could encourage or discourage behavior, according to the interests of society, through a regressive or progressive taxation, or for the granting of tax incentives. It can be said that through this policy, taxation activity is intended to interfere in the economy, i.e. the relations of production and circulation of wealth.
  
  The commitment to the economic development inserted within a theoretical dissociation with the guarantee of equality of opportunity has become latent in the Federal Constitution of 1988, establishing a duty to ensure the full exercise of citizenship within the fundamentals of the Brazilian democratic state. The text of the 1988 Constitution was a milestone, containing legal provisions committed to eradicating poverty and reducing social inequalities, prohibition of discrimination of origin, sex, race and color. In this context, the state assumed new front should those with which exercises its power, starting to design public policies committed to the enhancement of life and reducing inequalities. In this aspect the 1988 Constitution, in a leading position and effective in the economic area, takes the economic model of welfare, giving the state agent role responsible for the planning and creation of public policies for economic development linked to the promotion of economic development, in conjunction with the reduction of inequalities of opportunity policies. Within the new perspective inaugurated by the 1988 Constitution, the committed economic development with social question arises not only as a necessity, but also as state power and duty, imbued with wide autonomy to define its public policies, which brings out of tax law issues as an indispensable tool. Primarily tribute manifests itself in the form of essential burden to finance state activities committed to the creation of social policies.
  
  ## Tax burden in Brazil
  
  The first known measure of the Brazilian tax burden was made in 1947 and resulted in a percentage of 13.8% of GDP. Since then, the measure has been growing gradually and continuously. Yet, according to data from the Internal Revenue Service of Brazil, in 1965, the Brazilian tax burden reached 19% of GDP. With the change in the Brazilian tax system, made possible by Amendment No. 18 of 1 December 1965, there was significant growth, reaching up to 26% of GDP index. In 1986, the analysis of the tax burden resulted in 26.2% of the national GDP. The analysis of the Federal Revenue of Brazil for 2005 indicates the percentage of 37.37% of GDP. The Brazilian tax burden amounts to 1/3 of the GDP share and places Brazil in the list of countries with the highest burdens in the world, comparable to France, Germany and Sweden, without, however, promoting the same return for the population that these countries provide.
  
  Noteworthy in these figures the importance of indirect taxes levied on all taxpayers. Given this number, it can be inferred that in Brazil, taxes have high share in GDP, these numbers consistent with the levels of developed countries and incompatible with the low quality of state consideration offered, especially in the social sphere. The explicit dichotomy, obtained by analysis of the collection product in relation to the state consideration leads to the unequivocal conclusion that the high national tax revenue is lost before reaching its intended purpose. Revenue collections annually achieves a record: in contrast, investments in state consideration of social services and projects experience a stagnation of the amounts invested, covering the inversely proportional to the growth path, compared to what it collects and population increase.
  
  ## Levy profile
  
  The collection of federal taxes on the reserve base, shows that of the amount collected by the IRS of Brazil, the majority of the taxes are based on consumption, with approximately 53% on average of the funds raised by Revenue Federal Brazil and continue accounting for more than half of tax (52%) charged by the agency. This tax structure is even more perverse when we add the taxes collected at the state and municipal levels, which bring in the largest source of revenue. The tax burden on consumption is regressive. In Brazil those who earn up to twice the minimum wage spend 26% of their income to pay indirect taxes, while the tax burden for families with income higher than 30 times the minimum wage amounts to only 7%. Excessive taxation on consumption depresses demand directly affecting the economy, reducing the consumption of the middle and lower income families.
  
  Taxes that affect equity in Brazil have an insignificant collection, and the taxes on income remained virtually the same share of the total revenues, from 38.80% on average to 41.14%.
  
  