title: 2008 Massachusetts Question 1
text: # 2008 Massachusetts Question 1
  
  Elections in Massachusetts :
  
  General
  
  1942
  
  1944
  
  1946
  
  1948
  
  1950
  
  1952
  
  1954
  
  1956
  
  1958
  
  1960
  
  1962
  
  1964
  
  1966
  
  1970
  
  1974
  
  1978
  
  1982
  
  1986
  
  1990
  
  1994
  
  1998
  
  2002
  
  2006
  
  2008
  
  2010
  
  2012
  
  2014
  
  2016
  
  2018
  
  2020
  
  2022 :
  
  Federal government
  
  U.S. President
  
  1788–89
  
  1792
  
  1796
  
  1800
  
  1804
  
  1808
  
  1812
  
  1816
  
  1820
  
  1824
  
  1828
  
  1832
  
  1836
  
  1840
  
  1844
  
  1848
  
  1852
  
  1856
  
  1860
  
  1864
  
  1868
  
  1872
  
  1876
  
  1880
  
  1884
  
  1888
  
  1892
  
  1896
  
  1900
  
  1904
  
  1908
  
  1912
  
  1916
  
  1920
  
  1924
  
  1928
  
  1932
  
  1936
  
  1940
  
  1944
  
  1948
  
  1952
  
  1956
  
  1960
  
  1964
  
  1968
  
  1972
  
  1976
  
  1980
  
  1984
  
  1988
  
  1992
  
  1996
  
  2000
  
  2004
  
  Dem
  
  2008
  
  Dem
  
  GOP
  
  2012
  
  2016
  
  Dem
  
  GOP
  
  2020
  
  Dem
  
  GOP
  
  2024
  
  Dem
  
  GOP
  
  U.S. Senate
  
  Class 1: 1788
  
  1790
  
  1796 (S)
  
  1796
  
  1798
  
  1800 (S)
  
  1803
  
  1808 (S)
  
  1810 (S)
  
  1811
  
  1813 (S)
  
  1815
  
  1815 (S)
  
  1816 (S)
  
  1818 (S)
  
  1820
  
  1820 (S)
  
  1822
  
  1826
  
  1827
  
  1829 (S)
  
  1833
  
  1839
  
  February 1841 (S)
  
  1845
  
  1851
  
  1851 (S)
  
  1857
  
  1863
  
  1869
  
  1874 (S)
  
  1875
  
  1881
  
  1887
  
  1893
  
  1899
  
  1905
  
  1911
  
  1916
  
  1922
  
  1928
  
  1934
  
  1940
  
  1946
  
  1952
  
  1958
  
  1962 (S)
  
  1964
  
  1970
  
  1976
  
  1982
  
  1988
  
  1994
  
  2000
  
  2006
  
  2010 (S)
  
  2012
  
  2018
  
  2024
  
  Class 2: 1788
  
  1793
  
  1796
  
  1800 (S)
  
  1803 (S)
  
  1805
  
  1810
  
  1811 (S)
  
  1816
  
  1822 (S)
  
  1826 (S)
  
  1828
  
  1835
  
  January 1841 (S)
  
  1841
  
  1845 (S)
  
  1847
  
  1853
  
  1855 (S)
  
  1859
  
  1865
  
  1871
  
  1873 (S)
  
  1877
  
  1883
  
  1889
  
  1895
  
  1901
  
  1905 (S)
  
  1907
  
  1913
  
  1918
  
  1924
  
  1930
  
  1936
  
  1942
  
  1944 (S)
  
  1948
  
  1954
  
  1960
  
  1966
  
  1972
  
  1978
  
  1984
  
  1990
  
  1996
  
  2002
  
  2008
  
  2013 (S)
  
  2014
  
  2020
  
  U.S. House
  
  1788/1789
  
  1790/1792
  
  1792/1793
  
  1794/1795
  
  1796/1797
  
  1798/1799
  
  1800/1801
  
  1802/1803
  
  1804
  
  1806
  
  1808
  
  1810/1811
  
  1812/1813
  
  1814/1815
  
  3rd
  
  1816/1817
  
  1818/1819
  
  1820/1821
  
  1822/1823
  
  1824/1825
  
  1826/1827
  
  1828
  
  1830/1832
  
  1833/1834
  
  1834/1835
  
  1836
  
  1838/1839
  
  1840/1841
  
  1842/1844
  
  1844/1846
  
  1846
  
  1848/1850
  
  1850/1851
  
  1852
  
  1854
  
  1856
  
  1858
  
  1860
  
  1862
  
  1864
  
  1866
  
  1868
  
  1870
  
  1872
  
  1874
  
  1876
  
  1878
  
  1880
  
  1882
  
  1884
  
  1886
  
  1888
  
  1890
  
  1892
  
  1894
  
  1896
  
  1898
  
  1900
  
  1902
  
  1904
  
  1906
  
  1908
  
  1910
  
  1912
  
  1914
  
  1916
  
  1918
  
  1920
  
  1922
  
  1924
  
  1926
  
  1928
  
  1930
  
  1932
  
  1934
  
  1936
  
  1938
  
  1940
  
  1942
  
  1944
  
  1946
  
  1948
  
  1950
  
  1952
  
  1954
  
  1956
  
  1958
  
  1960
  
  1962
  
  1964
  
  1966
  
  1968
  
  1970
  
  1972
  
  1974
  
  1976
  
  1978
  
  1980
  
  1982
  
  1984
  
  1986
  
  1988
  
  1990
  
  1991 (1st)
  
  1992
  
  1994
  
  1996
  
  1998
  
  2000
  
  2001 (9th)
  
  2002
  
  2004
  
  2006
  
  2007 (5th)
  
  2008
  
  2010
  
  2012
  
  2013 (5th)
  
  2014
  
  2016
  
  2018
  
  2020
  
  2022 :
  
  State government
  
  Governor
  
  1800
  
  1801
  
  1802
  
  1803
  
  1804
  
  1805
  
  1806
  
  1807
  
  1808
  
  1809
  
  1810
  
  1811
  
  1812
  
  1813
  
  1814
  
  1815
  
  1816
  
  1817
  
  1818
  
  1819
  
  1820
  
  1821
  
  1822
  
  1823
  
  1824
  
  1825
  
  1826
  
  1827
  
  1828
  
  1829
  
  1830
  
  Apr. 1831
  
  Nov. 1831
  
  1832
  
  1833
  
  1834
  
  1835
  
  1836
  
  1837
  
  1838
  
  1839
  
  1840
  
  1841
  
  1842
  
  1843
  
  1844
  
  1845
  
  1846
  
  1847
  
  1848
  
  1849
  
  1850
  
  1851
  
  1852
  
  1853
  
  1854
  
  1855
  
  1856
  
  1857
  
  1858
  
  1859
  
  1860
  
  1861
  
  1862
  
  1863
  
  1864
  
  1865
  
  1866
  
  1867
  
  1868
  
  1869
  
  1870
  
  1871
  
  1872
  
  1873
  
  1874
  
  1875
  
  1876
  
  1877
  
  1878
  
  1879
  
  1880
  
  1881
  
  1882
  
  1883
  
  1884
  
  1885
  
  1886
  
  1887
  
  1888
  
  1889
  
  1890
  
  1891
  
  1892
  
  1893
  
  1894
  
  1895
  
  1896
  
  1897
  
  1898
  
  1899
  
  1900
  
  1901
  
  1902
  
  1903
  
  1904
  
  1905
  
  1906
  
  1907
  
  1908
  
  1909
  
  1910
  
  1911
  
  1912
  
  1913
  
  1914
  
  1915
  
  1916
  
  1917
  
  1918
  
  1919
  
  1920
  
  1922
  
  1924
  
  1926
  
  1928
  
  1930
  
  1932
  
  1934
  
  1936
  
  1938
  
  1940
  
  1942
  
  1944
  
  1946
  
  1948
  
  1950
  
  1952
  
  1954
  
  1956
  
  1958
  
  1960
  
  1962
  
  1964
  
  1966
  
  1970
  
  1974
  
  1978
  
  1982
  
  1986
  
  1990
  
  1994
  
  1998
  
  2002
  
  2006
  
  2010
  
  2014
  
  2018
  
  2022
  
  State Senate
  
  1787
  
  1824
  
  2004
  
  2006
  
  2008
  
  2010
  
  2012
  
  2014
  
  2016
  
  2018
  
  2020
  
  2022
  
  State House
  
  2006
  
  2008
  
  2010
  
  2012
  
  2014
  
  2016
  
  2020
  
  2022
  
  Governor's Council
  
  2006
  
  2010
  
  2014
  
  2018
  
  2022
  
  Ballot measures
  
  1980: Proposition 2½
  
  2002: English Language Education in Public Schools
  
  2006: 2008
  
  Greyhound Protection
  
  Sensible Marijuana Policy
  
  State Income Tax Repeal
  
  2010: No Sales Tax for Alcohol
  
  Sales Tax Relief
  
  Comprehensive Permits and Regional Planning
  
  2012: Right to Repair
  
  Death with Dignity
  
  Medical Marijuana
  
  2014: Automatic Gas Tax Increase Repeal
  
  Expansion of Bottle Deposits
  
  Casino Repeal
  
  Paid Sick Days
  
  2016: Expand Slot Machine Gaming
  
  Charter School Expansion
  
  Farm Animal Confinement
  
  Legalization, Regulation and Taxation of Marijuana
  
  2018: Gender Identity Anti-Discrimination
  
  2020: pending :
  
  Boston
  
  Mayor
  
  1822
  
  1823
  
  1824
  
  Apr 1825
  
  Dec 1825
  
  1826
  
  1827
  
  1828
  
  1829
  
  1830
  
  1831
  
  1832
  
  1833
  
  1834
  
  1835
  
  1836
  
  1837
  
  1838
  
  1839
  
  1840
  
  1841
  
  1842
  
  1843
  
  1844–45
  
  Dec 1845
  
  1846
  
  1847
  
  1848
  
  1849
  
  1850
  
  1851
  
  1852
  
  1853–54
  
  Dec 1854
  
  1855
  
  1856
  
  1857
  
  1858
  
  1859
  
  1860
  
  1861
  
  1862
  
  1863
  
  1864
  
  1865
  
  1866
  
  1867
  
  1868
  
  1869
  
  1871
  
  1872
  
  1873
  
  1874
  
  1875
  
  1876
  
  1877
  
  1878
  
  1879
  
  1880
  
  1881
  
  1882
  
  1883
  
  1884
  
  1885
  
  1886
  
  1887
  
  1888
  
  1889
  
  1890
  
  1891
  
  1892
  
  1893
  
  1894
  
  1895
  
  1897
  
  1899
  
  1901
  
  1903
  
  1905
  
  1907
  
  1910
  
  1914
  
  1917
  
  1921
  
  1925
  
  1929
  
  1933
  
  1937
  
  1941
  
  1945
  
  1949
  
  1951
  
  1955
  
  1959
  
  1963
  
  1967
  
  1971
  
  1975
  
  1979
  
  1983
  
  1987
  
  1991
  
  1993
  
  1997
  
  2001
  
  2005
  
  2009
  
  2013
  
  2017
  
  2021
  
  City council
  
  1977
  
  1979
  
  1981
  
  1983
  
  1985
  
  1987
  
  1989
  
  1991
  
  1993
  
  1995
  
  1997
  
  1999
  
  2001
  
  2003
  
  2005
  
  2007
  
  2009
  
  2011
  
  2013
  
  2015
  
  2017
  
  2019
  
  2021 :
  
  Springfield
  
  Mayor
  
  1953
  
  1955
  
  1957
  
  1959
  
  1961
  
  1963
  
  1965
  
  1967
  
  1969
  
  1971
  
  1973 (S)
  
  1973
  
  1975
  
  1977
  
  1979
  
  1983
  
  1981
  
  1985
  
  1987
  
  1989 (S)
  
  1989
  
  1991
  
  1993
  
  1995
  
  1997
  
  1999
  
  2001
  
  2003
  
  2005
  
  2007
  
  2009
  
  2011
  
  2015
  
  2019 :
  
  Worcester
  
  Mayor
  
  1987
  
  1989
  
  1991
  
  1993
  
  1995
  
  1997
  
  1999
  
  2001
  
  2003
  
  2005
  
  2007
  
  2009
  
  2011
  
  2013
  
  2015
  
  2017
  
  2019
  
  2021
  
  2023 :
  
  vte :
  
  The State Income Tax Repeal, also known as Massachusetts Question 1, was one of the 2008 ballot measures that appeared on the November 4, 2008 ballot in the U.S. state of Massachusetts. Voters were asked whether or not they approved of the proposed measure which, if it had passed, would have ended the 5.3% income tax in Massachusetts on wages, interest, dividends and capital gains. Ultimately, Massachusetts voters defeated Question 1 by a wide margin, with approximately 70% opposed versus 30% in favor.
  
  ## Specific provisions
  
  This proposed law would have had the following features:
  
  * Reduction of the state personal income tax rate to 2.65% for all categories of taxable income for the tax year beginning on or after January 1, 2009.
  * Elimination of the tax for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2010.
  * The personal income tax to which the initiative would have applied would have been the 'income received or gain realized by individuals and married couples, by estates of deceased persons, by certain trustees and other fiduciaries, by persons who are partners in and receive income from partnerships, by corporate trusts, and by persons who receive income as shareholders of "S corporations" as defined under federal tax law.'
  * The proposed law would not have affected the tax due on income or gain realized in a tax year beginning before January 1, 2009.
  * The proposed law states that if any of its parts were declared invalid, the other parts would stay in effect.
  
  ## Supporters of the income tax repeal
  
  The official proponent of the measure was the Committee for Small Government. Michael Cloud and Carla Howell led the committee.
  
  Initiative supporter Michael Cloud believed that the measure would lower the budget from about $28 billion to $17 billion, which is approximately the size of the 1995 state budget.
  
  Polling showed that 46 percent of those asked supported the measure before hearing any of its details, and 40 percent still supported it after hearing about the measure in depth.
  
  ### Arguments that were presented in support of Question 1
  
  * Total state government spending is in excess of $47.3 billion. Total state revenues are in excess of $47.3 billion. The income tax is less than 27% of the state government's revenue.
  * Municipal (city and town) government spending is more than $22 billion on top of state government spending, bringing total government spending in Massachusetts to nearly $70 billion. The income tax is only 17% of total government spending.
  * Waste, fraud and abuse as exposed in the media nearly every day are only the tip of the garbage heap; when polled, voters estimated government waste at 41%. An informal poll of government employees estimated waste at 50%.
  * State politicians have not kept faith with their promises to taxpayers. The Massachusetts State Legislature blockaded a ballot question approved by the citizens of the commonwealth in 2000 that would have reduced the state income tax to 5%.
  * 3.4 million Massachusetts taxpayers would get back an average of $3,700 each annually.
  * People would find the Bay State a more attractive place to live, work, invest, and raise families.
  * From 1991 to 2007 more than 550,000 people moved out of Massachusetts, ranking the commonwealth as the 2nd worst state in the US in terms of population loss.
  
  ### Funding
  
  According to campaign finance reports, as of November 1, 2008 the Committee for Small Government had raised approximately $385,000 since creation and had $14,131.72 cash left. They also had about $80,000 in outstanding liabilities.
  
  As of August 15, 2008, Ms Howell and Mr Cloud had paid themselves almost $200,000 from committee donations for "consulting fees" over the previous 6 years for services rendered to their own campaigns while soliciting donors for additional contributions because the campaign was out of funds.
  
  ### Earlier attempt to repeal income tax
  
  The Committee for Small Government advanced a similar initiative, called the Massachusetts End the Income Tax initiative, in 2002. That measure did not pass and received 885,683 votes, or 45.3 percent.
  
  ### Individual Support
  
  The Republican senatorial candidate, Jeff Beatty, said that he supported Question 1 while challenging incumbent-John Kerry.
  
  ### Editorial Support
  
  Stephen Moore of the Wall Street Journal stated: "The forces of the tax-and-spend status quo will descend on this initiative like British troops after the original Boston tea party, but somebody has to make an effort to stop the relentless growth of government."
  
  Steve Forbes of Forbes magazine stated: "This is an attack on political establishments there and throughout the U.S. that routinely put their own interests above those of their constituents: lavish government pensions with payouts that would bankrupt private companies; resistance to genuine reform in Medicaid spending, which has become the biggest item on virtually every state's budget; ever more pork-barrel spending; and ever more obsequiousness to rapacious special interests. Bay State voters – go for Proposition 1."
  
  ## Opposition
  
  ### Funding
  
  According to campaign finance reports, as of October 15, 2008 the Coalition for Our Communities, the organization opposing this tax cut, had raised over $5 million—99.8% from teachers' and other government sector unions.
  
  ### Individual opponents
  
  Michael Widmer, president of the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation,
  
  Gov. Deval Patrick
  
  The Selectman in the town of Wayland voted unanimously to oppose the initiative.
  
  State Rep. Tom Conroy, D-Wayland
  
  Senator John Kerry (D-MA) publicly opposed it while running for reelection for senate.
  
  Republican State Senator and future U.S. senator Scott Brown voted against Question 1 despite voting against raising the state's flat tax to 5.95% while in the state senate in 2003.
  
  ### Organizations against the measure
  
  Coalition for Our Communities, an organization created by the Massachusetts AFL-CIO that reportedly had $1.34 million with which to mount an effort to defeat the measure. The Coalition's funds are derived mainly from unions, including $750,000 from the National Education Association. The group also received $250,000 from American Federation of Teachers Solidarity Fund. Both the NEA and the AFTSF are based in Washington, D.C.
  
  ### Editorial opposition
  
  The Boston Globe officially asked voters to vote "no" on Question 1.
  
  ### Arguments that were presented against Question 1
  
  * Massachusetts would lose about 40% of its income and would deal an $11 billion blow to the state, which would have adverse effects throughout state government.
  * It would put education, health care, public safety and infrastructure at risk.
  * Mass Municipal Association, representing all 351 towns, estimated cuts in local aid as approximately $3 Billion.
  * Proponents have not specified any specific cuts that could be made that approach 40% of state revenue.
  
  ### Funding
  
  According to campaign finance reports, as of November 1, 2008 The Coalition for Our Communities had raised approximately $6,625,000 since creation and had $117,270.95 cash left. They also received about an additional $650,000 in in-kind donations from unions such as donated staff, supplies, postage etc.
  
  ## History of petition drive and blocking allegations
  
  The proponents submitted about 100,000 signatures to the Massachusetts Secretary of State for the first phase of signature collection. 76,084 of those signatures were determined to be valid, with a requirement that 66,593 must be valid for the initiative to proceed to the next step. The next step was for the Massachusetts State Legislature to take up the measure. They declined to pass it by the first Wednesday in May 2008, meaning that the proponents had to collect an additional 11,099 valid signatures by June 18, 2008. On July 3, it was announced that 15,913 additional certified signatures had been filed, making the measure extremely likely to appear on the ballot.
  
  The Massachusetts Teachers Association, whose mailing address is the same as the "Committee for our Communities", admitted in December 2007 that it had made phone calls to people who had signed the petition to place the income tax repeal on the ballot, inquiring about whether their signatures were valid. The calls were made from a group identifying itself as the "Committee for our Communities".
  
  ## Results
  
  State Income Tax Repeal Initiative :
  
  | Choice | Votes | % |
  | - | - | - |
  | No | 2,070,699 | 69.37 |
  | Yes | 914,420 | 30.63 |
  | Valid votes | 2,985,119 | 96.20 |
  | Invalid or blank votes | 117,876 | 3.80 |
  | Total votes | 3,102,995 | 100.00 |
  | Registered voters/turnout | 4,220,488 | 73.52 |
  