title: 2000 Arizona Proposition 203
text: # 2000 Arizona Proposition 203
  
  Elections in Arizona :
  
  Federal government
  
  Presidential elections
  
  1912
  
  1916
  
  1920
  
  1924
  
  1928
  
  1932
  
  1936
  
  1940
  
  1944
  
  1948
  
  1952
  
  1956
  
  1960
  
  1964
  
  1968
  
  1972
  
  1976
  
  1980
  
  1984
  
  1988
  
  1992
  
  1996
  
  2000
  
  2004
  
  2008
  
  2012
  
  2016
  
  2020
  
  2024
  
  Presidential primaries
  
  Democratic
  
  2004
  
  2008
  
  2016
  
  2020
  
  Republican
  
  2008
  
  2012
  
  2016
  
  2024
  
  U.S. Senate elections
  
  1912
  
  1914
  
  1916
  
  1920
  
  1922
  
  1926
  
  1928
  
  1932
  
  1934
  
  1938
  
  1940
  
  1944
  
  1946
  
  1950
  
  1952
  
  1956
  
  1958
  
  1962
  
  1964
  
  1968
  
  1970
  
  1974
  
  1976
  
  1980
  
  1982
  
  1986
  
  1988
  
  1992
  
  1994
  
  1998
  
  2000
  
  2004
  
  2006
  
  2010
  
  2012
  
  2016
  
  2018
  
  2020 sp
  
  2022
  
  2024
  
  2028
  
  U.S. House of Representatives elections
  
  1911
  
  1912
  
  1914
  
  1916
  
  1918
  
  1920
  
  1922
  
  1924
  
  1926
  
  1928
  
  1930
  
  1932
  
  1933
  
  AL sp
  
  1934
  
  1936
  
  1938
  
  1940
  
  1942
  
  1944
  
  1946
  
  1948
  
  1950
  
  1952
  
  1954
  
  1956
  
  1958
  
  1960
  
  1961
  
  2nd sp
  
  1962
  
  1964
  
  1966
  
  1968
  
  1970
  
  1972
  
  1974
  
  1976
  
  1978
  
  1980
  
  1982
  
  1984
  
  1986
  
  1988
  
  1990
  
  1991
  
  2nd sp
  
  1992
  
  1994
  
  1996
  
  1998
  
  2000
  
  2002
  
  2004
  
  2006
  
  8th
  
  2008
  
  2010
  
  2012
  
  8th sp
  
  2014
  
  2016
  
  2018
  
  8th sp
  
  2020
  
  2022
  
  2024 :
  
  State government
  
  State elections
  
  2006
  
  2010
  
  2014
  
  2016
  
  2018
  
  2020
  
  2022
  
  Gubernatorial elections
  
  1911
  
  1914
  
  1916
  
  1918
  
  1920
  
  1922
  
  1924
  
  1926
  
  1928
  
  1930
  
  1932
  
  1934
  
  1936
  
  1938
  
  1940
  
  1942
  
  1944
  
  1946
  
  1948
  
  1950
  
  1952
  
  1954
  
  1956
  
  1958
  
  1960
  
  1962
  
  1964
  
  1966
  
  1968
  
  1970
  
  1974
  
  1978
  
  1982
  
  1986
  
  1990
  
  1994
  
  1998
  
  2002
  
  2006
  
  2010
  
  2014
  
  2018
  
  2022
  
  2026
  
  Secretary of State elections
  
  2014
  
  2018
  
  2022
  
  Attorney General elections
  
  2018
  
  2022
  
  Treasurer elections
  
  2022
  
  Superintendent elections
  
  2018
  
  2022
  
  Senate elections
  
  1956
  
  1958
  
  1960
  
  1962
  
  1964
  
  1966
  
  1968
  
  1970
  
  1972
  
  1974
  
  1976
  
  1978
  
  1980
  
  1982
  
  1984
  
  1986
  
  1988
  
  1990
  
  1992
  
  1994
  
  1996
  
  1998
  
  2000
  
  2002
  
  2004
  
  2006
  
  2008
  
  2010
  
  2012
  
  2014
  
  2016
  
  2018
  
  2020
  
  2022
  
  2024
  
  House of Representatives elections
  
  1956
  
  1958
  
  1960
  
  1962
  
  2006
  
  2018
  
  2020
  
  2022 :
  
  Ballot measures
  
  List of Arizona ballot propositions
  
  2000
  
  203
  
  2004
  
  200
  
  2006
  
  107
  
  204
  
  207
  
  2008
  
  102
  
  2010
  
  100
  
  203
  
  2020
  
  207 :
  
  Phoenix
  
  Mayoral elections
  
  2011
  
  2015
  
  2018–19 (sp)
  
  2020 :
  
  Tucson
  
  Mayoral elections
  
  1991
  
  1995
  
  1999
  
  2003
  
  2007
  
  2011
  
  2015
  
  2019
  
  2023 :
  
  Other localities
  
  Chandler
  
  2006
  
  Gilbert
  
  2012
  
  Glendale
  
  2012
  
  2016
  
  Maricopa County
  
  2024
  
  Mesa
  
  2008
  
  2012
  
  2016
  
  2020
  
  Scottsdale
  
  2008
  
  2012 :
  
  vte :
  
  Arizona Proposition 203, also known as English for the Children, is a ballot initiative that was passed by 63% of Arizona voters on November 7, 2000. It limited the type of instruction available to English language learner (ELL) students. Before Proposition 203, schools were free in terms of ELL instruction to use bilingual or immersion methods. According to a cover letter from the Arizona Department of Education Superintendent of Public Instruction Lisa Graham Keegan to the Arizona Legislature, it was impossible to make a correct analysis regarding how many students were learning through English as a second language programs, as opposed to bilingual education. The school districts had submitted "conflicting information," and 40% had not submitted any data, in spite of three deadline extensions.
  
  Proposition 203, like the similar California Proposition 227, was named after its financial supporter Ron Unz, a Silicon Valley software entrepreneur. 61% of the voters had passed Proposition 227. Arizona, Massachusetts, and Colorado followed with similar campaigns directed by Unz. On November 5, 2002, Question 2 in Massachusetts was passed by 68% of the voters, but Amendment 31 in Colorado was rejected by 56% of the voters. Unz's goal was to replace bilingual education with structured or sheltered English immersion programs. The book English for the Children: Mandated by the People, Skewed by Politicians and Special Interests by Johanna J. Haver (Rowman & Littlefield Education, 2013) reconstructs the politics surrounding Unz's movement and its effects on the education of ELLs.
  
  ## Content
  
  The actual text of the legislation begins with declarations regarding the importance of English and learning English. It goes on to state that immigrant parents want their children to acquire "a good knowledge of English," allowing them to "fully participate in the American dream." It explains that the government and Arizona public schools have a moral responsibility to "provide all of Arizona's children... with the skills necessary to become productive members of our society." It elaborates that public schools "currently do an inadequate job of educating immigrant children" by "experimental language programs whose failure over the past two decades is demonstrated by the current high drop-out rates and low English literacy levels of many immigrant children." It makes the point that "young immigrant children can easily acquire full fluency in a new language, such as English, if they are heavily exposed to that language in the classroom at an early age."
  
  The resolution states that "all children in Arizona public schools shall be taught English as rapidly and effectively as possible." ELLs should be educated in immersion programs during a temporary transition period "not normally intended to exceed one year." A parent may request for his or her child to be exempt if it can be determined that the child already knows English, the child is ten years old or older, or the child is identified as having special needs. However, for a child to claim to have special needs, it must be confirmed that education in English is not the best option for the child.
  
  ## Media coverage
  
  The New York Times ran a front-page story in August prior to the November 2000 election, showing that California's version of the initiative, Proposition 227, had been highly successful, with a rise in standardized test scores among English language learners after two years. In spite of noted bilingual education theorists' arguments, disputing the particulars of the article, the Times story is believed to have strongly affected public opinion and the passage of Arizona Proposition 203.
  
  ## Implementation
  
  Implementation of the policy was scheduled to occur at the beginning of the 2001–2002 school year. There was widespread confusion throughout the state because of differences of opinion regarding the language used in the text of the proposition. Following the implementation, some schools changed their approach to educating ELLs, but several districts obtained waivers for their ELL students and continued their bilingual education programs. For the most part, neither the bilingual nor the immersion programs were in compliance with the law. Fewer than 11% of the state's ELL students achieved proficiency in a year's time.
  
  