title: To each according to his contribution
text: # To each according to his contribution
  
  "To each according to his contribution" is a principle of distribution considered to be one of the defining features of socialism. It refers to an arrangement whereby individual compensation is representative of one's contribution to the social product (total output of the economy) in terms of effort, labor and productivity. This is in contrast to the method of distribution and compensation in capitalism, an economic and political system in which property owners can receive income by virtue of ownership irrespective of their contribution to the social product.
  
  The concept formed the basic definition of socialism for its pre-Marxist proponents, including Ricardian socialists, classical economists, collectivist anarchists and individualist anarchists, as well as for Marx, who contrasted it with "to each according to his need" as the corresponding principle of completed communism.
  
  ## Definition and purpose
  
  To each according to his contribution was a concept espoused by many members of the socialist and labor movement. The French socialist Saint-Simonists of the 1820s and 1830s used slogans such as," from each according to his ability, to each ability according to its work" or," From each according to his capacity, to each according to his works.” Other examples of this can be found from Ferdinand Lassalle's and Eugen Dühring's statements to Leon Trotsky's writings. Vladimir Lenin, inspired by Marx's writing on the subject in his Critique of the Gotha Programme, claimed the principle to be a fundamental element of socialism within Marxist theory.
  
  Libertarian socialist thinkers, such as American anarchist Benjamin Tucker, defined socialism as a system whereby the laborer receives the full product of his labor through the elimination of exploitation and accrual of unearned income to a capitalist class.
  
  The term means simply that each worker in a socialist society receives compensation and benefits according to the quantity and value of the labor that they contributed. This translates into workers of great productivity receiving more wages and benefits than workers of average productivity, and substantially more than workers of lesser productivity. An extension of this principle could also be made so that the more difficult one's job is – whether this difficulty is derived from greater training requirements, job intensity, safety hazards, etc. – the more one is rewarded for the labor contributed. The purpose of the principle, as Trotsky would later state, is to promote productivity. This is done by creating incentives to work harder, longer, and more productively. The principle is ultimately a stowaway from capitalism that, according to Marx, will vanish as work becomes more automated and enjoyable, and goods become available in abundance.
  
  ## Elaboration by Marx
  
  Part of a series on :
  
  Marxism :
  
  Theoretical works
  
  Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844
  
  The German Ideology
  
  Wage Labour and Capital
  
  The Communist Manifesto
  
  The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte
  
  Grundrisse der Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie
  
  A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy
  
  Das Kapital
  
  Critique of the Gotha Programme
  
  Dialectics of Nature
  
  Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism
  
  The State and Revolution
  
  History and Class Consciousness
  
  On Contradiction
  
  Prison Notebooks
  
  Dialectic of Enlightenment
  
  The Wretched of the Earth
  
  Guerrilla Warfare
  
  Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses
  
  Women, Race and Class
  
  Empire (Hardt and Negri book) :
  
  Philosophy
  
  Dialectical materialism
  
  Philosophy of nature :
  
  Critique of political economy
  
  Capital (accumulation)
  
  Crisis theory
  
  Commodity
  
  Concrete and abstract labor
  
  Factors of production
  
  Falling profit-rate tendency
  
  Means of production
  
  Mode of production
  
  Asiatic
  
  Capitalist
  
  Socialist
  
  Productive forces
  
  Scientific socialism
  
  Surplus product
  
  Socially necessary labour time
  
  Value-form
  
  Wage labour :
  
  Sociology
  
  Alienation
  
  Base and superstructure
  
  Bourgeoisie
  
  Class
  
  Class consciousness
  
  Class struggle
  
  Classless society
  
  Commodity fetishism
  
  Communist society
  
  Critique of political economy
  
  Cultural hegemony
  
  Democracy
  
  Dictatorship of the proletariat
  
  Exploitation
  
  Human nature
  
  Ideology
  
  Immiseration
  
  Imperialism
  
  Lumpenproletariat
  
  Metabolic rift
  
  Proletariat
  
  Private property
  
  Relations of production
  
  Reification
  
  State theory
  
  Working class :
  
  History
  
  Philosophy in the Soviet Union
  
  Primitive accumulation
  
  Proletarian revolution
  
  World revolution
  
  Theory of historical trajectory :
  
  Aspects
  
  Aesthetics
  
  Archaeology
  
  Criminology
  
  Cultural analysis
  
  Cultural Studies
  
  Ethics
  
  Film theory
  
  Geography
  
  Historiography
  
  Literary criticism
  
  Marxism and religion
  
  Sociology
  
  Philosophy :
  
  Orthodox variants
  
  Analytical
  
  Black
  
  Classical
  
  Feminist
  
  Hegelian
  
  Humanist
  
  Instrumental
  
  Leninism
  
  Trotskyism
  
  Maoism
  
  Neo
  
  Open
  
  Post
  
  Structural
  
  Western
  
  Marxism–Leninism
  
  Anti-revisionism
  
  Marxism–Leninism–Maoism
  
  Gonzalo Thought
  
  Socialism with Chinese characteristics
  
  Titoism :
  
  Left communist variants
  
  Bordigism
  
  Communization
  
  Council communism :
  
  Libertarian variants
  
  Autonomism
  
  Situationism :
  
  Other variants
  
  Austromarxism
  
  Eurocommunism
  
  Neo-Gramscianism
  
  Neue Marx-Lektüre
  
  Revisionist :
  
  People
  
  Marx
  
  Engels
  
  Morris
  
  Lafargue
  
  Kautsky
  
  Plekhanov
  
  Du Bois
  
  Connolly
  
  Lenin
  
  Luxemburg
  
  Kollontai
  
  Hilferding
  
  Trotsky
  
  Grossman
  
  Zinoviev
  
  Bloch
  
  Lukács
  
  Korsch
  
  Bukharin
  
  Bordiga
  
  Ho
  
  Serge
  
  Gramsci
  
  Pashukanis
  
  Nosaka
  
  Benjamin
  
  Mao
  
  Mariátegui
  
  Toledano
  
  Horkheimer
  
  Volpe
  
  Dutt
  
  Brecht
  
  Marcuse
  
  Bordiga
  
  Fromm
  
  Neumann
  
  Lefebvre
  
  James
  
  Adorno
  
  Padmore
  
  Sartre
  
  Deutscher
  
  Beauvoir
  
  Nkrumah
  
  Sweezy
  
  Emmanuel
  
  Hill
  
  Bettelheim
  
  Draper
  
  Jones
  
  Hobsbawm
  
  Althusser
  
  Hinton
  
  Williams
  
  Freire
  
  Mandel
  
  Sivanandan
  
  Miliband
  
  Lefort
  
  Cabral
  
  Thompson
  
  Bauman
  
  Fanon
  
  Kosik
  
  Berger
  
  Castro
  
  Guevara
  
  Heller
  
  Guattari
  
  Mészáros
  
  O'Connor
  
  Wallerstein
  
  Mies
  
  Tronti
  
  Debord
  
  Amin
  
  Hall
  
  Nairn
  
  Parenti
  
  Negri
  
  Jameson
  
  Dussel
  
  Harvey
  
  Laclau
  
  Bahro
  
  Poulantzas
  
  Vattimo
  
  Badiou
  
  Altvater
  
  Anderson
  
  Löwy
  
  Resnick
  
  Vogel
  
  Sison
  
  Easthope
  
  Rancière
  
  Berman
  
  Przeworski
  
  Blackburn
  
  Cohen
  
  Therborn
  
  Ahmad
  
  Losurdo
  
  Ture
  
  Postone
  
  Rodney
  
  Spivak
  
  Newton
  
  Sakai
  
  Wood
  
  Federici
  
  Wolff
  
  Balibar
  
  Eagleton
  
  Hartsock
  
  Rowbotham
  
  Mouffe
  
  Geras
  
  Brenner
  
  Davis
  
  Cleaver
  
  Bishop
  
  Haraway
  
  Panitch
  
  Clarke
  
  Jessop
  
  Davis
  
  Wright
  
  Fraser
  
  Holloway
  
  Screpanti
  
  McLaren
  
  Tamás
  
  Hampton
  
  Cano
  
  Žižek
  
  Sankara
  
  Hennessy
  
  McDonnell
  
  Douzinas
  
  Cockshott
  
  Roediger
  
  Foster
  
  West
  
  Ghandy
  
  Marcos
  
  Tarasov
  
  Prashad
  
  Merrifield
  
  Varoufakis
  
  Kelley
  
  Linera
  
  Fisher
  
  Li
  
  Barker
  
  Coulthard
  
  Malm
  
  Seymour
  
  Toscano
  
  Bhattacharya
  
  Moufawad-Paul
  
  Srnicek
  
  Horvat
  
  Hamza
  
  Saito :
  
  Journals
  
  Capital & Class
  
  Capitalism Nature Socialism
  
  Catalyst
  
  Constellations
  
  Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory
  
  Historical Materialism
  
  Mediations
  
  Monthly Review
  
  New Left Review
  
  Race & Class
  
  Rethinking Marxism
  
  Science & Society
  
  Socialism and Democracy
  
  Socialist Register :
  
  Related topics
  
  21st-century communist theorists
  
  Anarchism
  
  Anarcho-communism
  
  Creative destruction
  
  Critical theory
  
  Criticism of Marxism
  
  Communism
  
  Communalism
  
  Economic determinism
  
  Historical determinism
  
  History of communism
  
  Left-wing politics
  
  Marxian economics
  
  New Left
  
  Old Left
  
  Municipalism
  
  Political ecology
  
  Radical democracy
  
  Social democracy
  
  Socialism
  
  Authoritarian
  
  Democratic
  
  Libertarian
  
  Market
  
  Reformist
  
  Revolutionary
  
  Utopian
  
  Soviet democracy
  
  Left-wing populism
  
  Universal class
  
  Vulgar Marxism
  
  Economism
  
  Worker cooperative
  
  Workers' council :
  
  Related categories Karl Marx
  
  Philosophy of history :
  
  Outline
  
   Communism portal
  
   Philosophy portal
  
   Socialism portal :
  
  vte :
  
  Capitalism can lead to a situation where the means of production are owned by a small minority who do not produce, but rather live off the labor of others. Socialism is said to remedy this by putting the means of production in common hands and rewarding individuals according to their contributions.
  
  In the Critique of the Gotha Programme, while criticizing Ferdinand Lassalle's ideas, Marx elaborates on the theory. According to Marx's analysis of the Programme, Lassalle suggests that "the proceeds of labor belong undiminished with equal right to all members of society". While agreeing that the citizens of a workers' society should be rewarded according to individual contributions, Marx claims that giving them the "full product" of their labor is impossible as some of the proceeds will be needed to maintain infrastructure and so forth. He then explains the nature of a communist society in its transition phase (socialist society), which does not emerge from its own foundations "but, on the contrary, .. from capitalist society; [and] thus in every respect, economically, morally, and intellectually, still stamped with the birthmarks of the old society from whose womb it emerges". And so, "accordingly, the individual producer receives back from society – after the deductions have been made – exactly what he gives to it". He explains this as:
  
     What he has given to it is his individual quantum of labor. For example, the social working day consists of the sum of the individual hours of work; the individual labor time of the individual producer is the part of the social working day contributed by him, his share in it. He receives a certificate from society that he has furnished such-and-such an amount of labor (after deducting his labor for the common funds); and with this certificate, he draws from the social stock of means of consumption as much as the same amount of labor cost. The same amount of labor which he has given to society in one form, he receives back in another.
  
  In the paragraph immediately following Marx continues to explain how this system of exchange is related to the capitalist system of exchange:
  
     Here, obviously, the same principle prevails as that which regulates the exchange of commodities, as far as this is exchange of equal values. Content and form are changed, because under the altered circumstances no one can give anything except his labor, and because, on the other hand, nothing can pass to the ownership of individuals, except individual means of consumption. But as far as the distribution of the latter among the individual producers is concerned, the same principle prevails as in the exchange of commodity equivalents: a given amount of labor in one form is exchanged for an equal amount of labor in another form.
  
  Marx says that this is rational and necessary, and that once society advances from the early phase of communist society and work becomes life's prime want, distribution will occur differently. During the completed phase of communism, the standard shall be "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs".
  
  ## The Marxist-Leninist view
  
  Lenin wrote The State and Revolution to inform the public and to prevent Marxism from becoming tainted by "opportunists" and "reformists", as he called them. The work is very important as it categorizes the "first phase of communist society" as socialism, with the completed phase being communism proper. The pamphlet also answers many questions and concerns of the Marxists of his time by utilizing the classic works of Marxism.
  
  When he is set to describe socialism and its economic features he turns to the authority of Marx, especially the Critique of the Gotha Programme. Lenin claims that socialism will not be perfect since, as Marx said, it has emerged from the womb of capitalism and which is in every respect stamped with the birthmarks of the old society. This society, socialism, will be unable to provide people with total equality, precisely because it is still marked by capitalism. He also explains the difference between the old society and the new as:
  
     The means of production are no longer the private property of individuals. The means of production belong to the whole of society. Every member of society, performing a certain part of the socially-necessary work, receives a certificate from society to the effect that he has done a certain amount of work. And with this certificate he receives from the public store of consumer goods a corresponding quantity of products. After a deduction is made of the amount of labor which goes to the public fund, every worker, therefore, receives from society as much as he has given to it.
  
  Lenin states that such a society is indeed socialism as it realizes the two principles of socialism "he who does not work, neither shall he eat" and "an equal amount of products for an equal amount of labor".
  
  Joseph Stalin and Leon Trotsky both mentioned the term in their works.
  
  * Stalin's most famous use of the concept is in his 1936 Soviet Constitution. He writes that "The principle applied in the U.S.S.R. is that of socialism: From each according to his ability, to each according to his work."
  * Trotsky's mention is in his famous The Revolution Betrayed. He says that "Capitalism prepared the conditions and forces for a social revolution: technique, science and the proletariat. The communist structure cannot, however, immediately replace the bourgeois society. The material and cultural inheritance from the past is wholly inadequate for that." He goes on to defend his position by saying that "in its first steps the workers’ state cannot yet permit everyone to work "according to his abilities" – that is, as much as he can and wishes to – nor can it reward everyone "according to his needs", regardless of the work he does." And he presents the principle as the method that socialism will use by saying: "In order to increase the productive forces, it is necessary to resort to the customary norms of wage payment – that is, to the distribution of life's goods in proportion to the quantity and quality of individual labor."
  