title: Eight per thousand
text: # Eight per thousand
  
  Part of a series on :
  
  Taxation :
  
  An aspect of fiscal policy :
  
  Policies
  
  Government revenue
  
  Property tax equalization
  
  Tax revenue
  
  Non-tax revenue
  
  Tax law
  
  Tax bracket
  
  Flat tax
  
  Tax threshold
  
  Exemption
  
  Credit
  
  Deduction
  
  Tax shift
  
  Tax cut
  
  Tax holiday
  
  Tax amnesty
  
  Tax advantage
  
  Tax incentive
  
  Tax reform
  
  Tax harmonization
  
  Tax competition
  
  Tax withholding
  
  Double taxation
  
  Representation
  
  Unions
  
  Medical savings account :
  
  Economics
  
  General Theory
  
  Price effect
  
  Excess burden
  
  Tax incidence
  
  Laffer curve
  
  Optimal tax
  
  Theories
  
  Optimal capital income taxation
  
  Distribution of Tax
  
  Tax rate
  
  Flat
  
  Progressive
  
  Regressive
  
  Proportional :
  
  Collection
  
  Revenue service
  
  Revenue stamp
  
  Tax assessment
  
  Taxable income
  
  Tax lien
  
  Tax refund
  
  Tax shield
  
  Tax residence
  
  Tax preparation
  
  Tax investigation
  
  Tax shelter
  
  Tax collector
  
  Private tax collection
  
  Tax farming :
  
  Noncompliance
  
  General
  
  Tax avoidance
  
  Repatriation tax avoidance
  
  Tax evasion
  
  Tax resistance
  
  Tax shelter
  
  Smuggling
  
  Black market
  
  Unreported employment
  
  Corporate
  
  Tax inversion
  
  Transfer mispricing
  
  Base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS)
  
  Double Irish
  
  Dutch Sandwich
  
  Single Malt
  
  CAIA/Green Jersey
  
  Locations
  
  Tax havens
  
  Corporate havens
  
  Offshore financial centres (OFCs)
  
  Offshore magic circle
  
  Conduit and sink OFCs
  
  Financial centres
  
  Financial Secrecy Index
  
  Major examples
  
  Ireland as a tax haven
  
  Ireland v Commission
  
  Leprechaun economics
  
  Liechtenstein tax affair
  
  Luxembourg Leaks
  
  Offshore Leaks
  
  Paradise Papers
  
  Panama Papers
  
  Swiss Leaks
  
  United States as a tax haven
  
  Panama as a tax haven :
  
  Types
  
  Direct
  
  Indirect
  
  Per unit
  
  Ad valorem
  
  Aviation
  
  Airport improvement
  
  Landing
  
  Solidarity
  
  Capital gains
  
  Expatriation
  
  Consumption
  
  Departure
  
  Hotel
  
  Sales
  
  Stamp
  
  Television
  
  Tourist
  
  Value-added
  
  Dividend
  
  Environmental tax
  
  Carbon
  
  Landfill
  
  Natural resources consumption
  
  Severance
  
  Steering
  
  Stumpage
  
  Excise
  
  Alcohol
  
  Cigarette
  
  Fat
  
  Meat
  
  Sin
  
  Sugary drink
  
  Tobacco
  
  General
  
  Georgist
  
  Gift
  
  Gross receipts
  
  Hypothecated
  
  Income
  
  Inheritance (estate)
  
  Land value
  
  Luxury
  
  Payroll
  
  Pigouvian
  
  Property
  
  Single
  
  Surtax
  
  Turnover
  
  Use
  
  User charge/fee
  
  Congestion
  
  Fuel
  
  Road/GNSS
  
  Toll
  
  Vehicle miles traveled
  
  Corporate profit
  
  Excess profits
  
  Windfall
  
  Negative (income)
  
  Wealth :
  
  International
  
  Financial transaction tax
  
  Currency transaction tax
  
  European Union Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB)
  
  Global minimum corporate tax rate
  
  Tobin tax
  
  Spahn tax
  
  Tax equalization
  
  Tax treaty
  
  Permanent establishment
  
  Transfer pricing
  
  European Union FTT
  
  Foreign revenue rule :
  
  Trade
  
  Custom
  
  Duty
  
  Tariff
  
  Import
  
  Export
  
  Tariff war
  
  Free trade
  
  Free-trade zone
  
  Trade agreement
  
  ATA Carnet :
  
  Research
  
  Academic
  
  Mihir A. Desai
  
  Dhammika Dharmapala
  
  James R. Hines Jr.
  
  Ronen Palan
  
  Joel Slemrod
  
  Gabriel Zucman
  
  Advocacy groups
  
  Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP)
  
  Oxfam (UK)
  
  Tax Foundation (US)
  
  Tax Justice Network (TJN)
  
  Tax Policy Center (US) :
  
  Religious
  
  Church tax
  
  Eight per thousand
  
  Teind
  
  Tithe
  
  Fiscus Judaicus
  
  Leibzoll
  
  Temple tax
  
  Tolerance tax
  
  Jizya
  
  Kharaj
  
  Khums
  
  Nisab
  
  Zakat :
  
  By country
  
  All Countries
  
  List of countries by tax rates
  
  Tax revenue to GDP ratio
  
  Tax rates in Europe
  
  Individual Countries
  
  Albania
  
  Algeria
  
  Argentina
  
  Armenia
  
  Australia
  
  Azerbaijan
  
  Bangladesh
  
  Bhutan
  
  Brazil
  
  Bulgaria
  
  BVI
  
  Canada
  
  China
  
  Colombia
  
  Croatia
  
  Denmark
  
  Finland
  
  France
  
  Germany
  
  Greece
  
  Hong Kong
  
  Iceland
  
  India
  
  Indonesia
  
  Iran
  
  Ireland
  
  Israel
  
  Italy
  
  Japan
  
  Kazakhstan
  
  Lithuania
  
  Malta
  
  Morocco
  
  Namibia
  
  Netherlands
  
  New Zealand
  
  Norway
  
  Pakistan
  
  Palestine
  
  Peru
  
  Philippines
  
  Poland
  
  Portugal
  
  Russia
  
  South Africa
  
  Sri Lanka
  
  Sweden
  
  Switzerland
  
  Taiwan
  
  Tanzania
  
  United Arab Emirates
  
  United Kingdom
  
  United States
  
  Uruguay :
  
  Business portal
  
   Money portal :
  
  vte :
  
  Eight per thousand (Italian: otto per mille) is an Italian law under which Italian taxpayers devolve a compulsory 8 ‰ = 0.8% (eight per mil, i.e. per thousand) from their annual income tax return to an organised religion recognised by Italy or, alternatively, to a state-run social assistance scheme.
  
  On the IRE form, people optionally declare a recipient. If they do not, the law stipulates that this undeclared amount be distributed among the normal recipients of such taxes in proportion to what they have already received from explicit declarations. In the period from 1990 to 2007, 42.7% expressed a choice, on average.
  
  A similar scheme has been introduced in 2006 to fund entities that carry out socially relevant activities (for example, non-profit, scientific research) with five per thousand (5 ‰).
  
  ## History
  
  The relations between Italy and the religious confessions in its territory can be traced back to the Statuto Albertino of 1848, which applied first to the Kingdom of Sardinia and then to the Kingdom of Italy. Its first article declared the "Roman Catholic Apostolic religion" the only state religion and granted legal toleration to all other religious confessions then present.
  
  Under the Lateran treaties of 1929, which were incorporated in the 1948 Constitution of the Italian Republic, the State paid a small monthly salary, called the congrua, to Catholic clergymen as compensation for the nationalization of Church properties at the time of the unification of Italy. This ended on 31 December 1986, with the entry into force, as a result of a 1984 agreement between the government and the Holy See of the "eight per thousand" system.
  
  ## Current status
  
  As of 2015 there are 12 possible beneficiaries of the tax:
  
  * The State itself
  * Catholic Church
  * Union of Methodist and Waldensian Churches
  * Seventh-day Adventist Church
  * Assemblies of God in Italy
  * Union of Italian Jewish Communities
  * Lutheran Evangelical Church in Italy
  * Baptist Evangelical Christian Union of Italy
  * Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of Italy
  * Apostolic Church in Italy
  * Italian Buddhist Union
  * Italian Hindu Union
  
  In addition an agreement has been signed with the Jehovah's Witnesses, but it has not yet received parliamentary ratification.
  
  In 2015, an agreement was signed with the Soka Gakkai Italian Buddhist Institute, which was approved by law on 28 June 2016.
  
  The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, in spite of having made an agreement on 4 April 2007, ratified by Law 127 of 30 July 2012, is refusing to participate in the division of the funds.
  
  At present it is not possible to designate an Islamic organization, despite Italy's population of over 1.4 million Muslims. Issues cited include a lack of a single central authority for the religion, concerns over Islamist extremist organizations being the recipients of funds, and Muslim beliefs on polygamy, education and women's rights that potentially contradict the Constitution.
  
  ## Utilisation
  
  Although the 1985 law on the matter declared that the state's portion of the proceeds was to be devoted to extraordinary expenses, such as world hunger, natural disasters and refugees, since 2004 a large proportion is employed for general purposes. In 2004, €80 million out of a total of about €100 million were thus employed, leading to criticism of the fact that part of it was used to finance the Italian military mission in Iraq. Because of its financial situation in 2011, the government decided to utilize the entire sum of about €145 million for purposes other than those indicated in the 1985 law: for instance, €57,277,063 were spent on improving the prison infrastructure.
  
  The purposes for which the religious groups may use their portions are laid down in the agreements entered into with the government. In the case of the Catholic Church, the purposes are specified in article 48 of the 1985 law: "worship needs of the people, support of the clergy, charitable activities in favour of Italian society and the Third World". Each year the Italian Episcopal Conference publishes the proportions it assigns under various headings. Thus at its meeting in May 2012 it approved the following distribution (in thousands of euros):
  
  * 1,148,076 Total amount received (100.0%)
  * 479,226 Worship and pastoral work (41.7%)
     * 156,000 To the dioceses (for worship and pastoral work) (13.6%)
     * 190,000 Buildings for worship (16.5%)
        * 125,000 New buildings for worship (10.9%)
        * 65,000 Safeguarding cultural property of the Church (5.7%)
     * 64,226 Fund for catechesis and Christian education (5.6%)
     * 12,000 Regional ecclesiastical tribunals (1.0%)
     * 57,000 Needs of national importance (5.0%)
  * 255,000 Charitable activities (22.2%)
     * 125,000 To the dioceses (for charity) (10.9%)
     * 85,000 Third World (7.4%)
     * 45,000 Needs of national importance (3.9%)
  * 363,850 Financial support of the clergy (31.7%)
  * 50,000 Reserve for future use for worship, pastoral work and charity (4.4%)
  
  The financial support for the clergy brings their salary up to a certain level, such as €852.93 a month for a priest at the beginning of his service, and €1,308.57 a month for a bishop at the maximum of his biennial increments (2007 figures).
  
  ## Choices expressed by taxpayers
  
  For the first fifteen years of the system there was a gradual increase of the percentage of those who chose their contributions to go to the Catholic Church and a corresponding diminution of those who chose the State as beneficiary. Of those who exercised a choice, 76.17% opted for the Catholic Church in 1990, increasing to 89.81% in 2004 and falling to 86.05% in 2006 and 85.01% in 2007. Since in 2007, for instance, only 43.50% of those who declared their incomes expressed a choice, those who did indicate the Catholic Church as beneficiary were less than 37% of the taxpayers, a figure much lower than the proportion of Italians who declare themselves Catholics, which corresponded rather to the proportion opting for the Church among those who did indicate a choice. Declarations in favour of the State, which were 22.31% in 1990, dropped to their lowest ever level of 7.60% in 2005, recovering later and reaching 11.95% in 2007.
  
  The eight-per-thousand tax has significantly helped the Piedmontese Waldensians, a Protestant community whose origins predate the Reformation, the Waldensians have only about 25,000 enlisted members but about 412,000 Italians support them and their charitable works.
  
  