title: Same-sex marriage in Aguascalientes
text: # Same-sex marriage in Aguascalientes
  
  Part of the LGBT rights series :
  
  Legal status of same-sex unions :
  
  Marriage
  
  Andorra
  
  Argentina
  
  Australia
  
  Austria
  
  Belgium
  
  Brazil
  
  Canada
  
  Chile
  
  Colombia
  
  Costa Rica
  
  Cuba
  
  Denmark
  
  Ecuador
  
  Estonia*
  
  Finland
  
  France
  
  Germany
  
  Iceland
  
  Ireland
  
  Luxembourg
  
  Malta
  
  Mexico
  
  $Netherlands^1$
  
  New $Zealand^2$
  
  Norway
  
  Portugal
  
  Slovenia
  
  South Africa
  
  Spain
  
  Sweden
  
  Switzerland
  
  Taiwan
  
  United $Kingdom^3$
  
  United $States^4$
  
  Uruguay :
  
  Civil unions and registered partnerships
  
  Bolivia
  
  Croatia
  
  Cyprus
  
  Czech Republic
  
  Greece
  
  Hungary
  
  Italy
  
  Latvia
  
  Liechtenstein
  
  Monaco
  
  Montenegro
  
  Netherlands:
  
    • Aruba
  
  San Marino
  
  United Kingdom:
  
    • Bermuda
  
    • Cayman Islands :
  
  Common-law marriage
  
  $Israel^5$ :
  
  Minimal recognition
  
  $Bulgaria^6$
  
  Cambodia:
  
    • 68 communes
  
  $China^7$
  
  $India:^8$
  
    • Chandigarh
  
    • Gujarat
  
    • Haryana
  
    • Kerala
  
    • Odisha
  
    • Punjab
  
    • Tamil Nadu
  
    • Uttarakhand
  
  $Japan^9$
  
  $Lithuania^6$
  
  $Namibia^{10}$
  
  $Netherlands:^2$
  
    • Curaçao
  
    • St Maarten
  
  $Poland^6$
  
  $Romania^{12}$
  
  $Slovakia^6$ :
  
  See also
  
  Same-sex union legislation
  
  Same-sex union court cases
  
  Timeline of same-sex marriage
  
  Recognition of same-sex unions in Africa
  
  Recognition of same-sex unions in Asia
  
  Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe
  
  Recognition of same-sex unions in the Americas
  
  Recognition of same-sex unions in Oceania
  
  Marriage privatization
  
  Divorce of same-sex couples
  
  Domestic partnership
  
  Military policy
  
  Adoption
  
  Listings by country
  
  LGBT rights by country or territory :
  
  Notes
  
  Performed in the Netherlands proper, including the Caribbean Netherlands. Registered in Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten in such cases, but the rights of marriage are not guaranteed.
  
  Neither performed nor recognized in Niue, Tokelau, or the Cook Islands.
  
  Neither performed nor recognized in six British Overseas Territories.
  
  Neither performed nor recognized in some tribal nations. Recognized but not performed in several other tribal nations and American Samoa.
  
  Cohabitation. Registered foreign marriages confer limited rights. Marriage recognized in some cities.
  
  The Coman v. Romania ruling of the European Court of Justice obliges the state to provide residency rights for the foreign spouses of EU citizens.
  
  Legal guardianships (nationwide, except Hong Kong and Macau), residency rights for foreign spouses of legal residents (Hong Kong).
  
  Unregistered cohabitation or Maitri karar–type contractual relationships, but they are not legally binding.
  
  Some cities and prefectures issue partnership certificates, though not legally formalized.
  
  Marriages conducted abroad between a Namibian national and a foreign spouse recognized for residency rights
  
  Hospital visitation rights through a "legal representative" status
  
  * Not yet in effect :
  
  LGBT portal :
  
  vte :
  
  Same-sex marriage is legal in Aguascalientes in accordance with a ruling from the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation on 2 April 2019 that the state's ban on same-sex marriage violated Articles 1 and 4 of the Constitution of Mexico. The ruling came into effect upon publication in the Official Gazette of the Federation on 16 August 2019, legalizing same-sex marriage in Aguascalientes.
  
  ## Legal history
  
  ### Background
  
  The Mexican Supreme Court ruled on 12 June 2015 that state bans on same-sex marriage are unconstitutional nationwide. The court's ruling is considered a "jurisprudential thesis" and did not invalidate state laws, meaning that same-sex couples denied the right to marry would still have to seek individual amparos in court. The ruling standardized the procedures for judges and courts throughout Mexico to approve all applications for same-sex marriages and made the approval mandatory.
  
  In May 2014, Manuel Gutiérrez Flores and Javier Rodrígueza Rivero requested an amparo against the civil registry in Aguascalientes City after it had rejected their request for a marriage license. The couple contested the constitutionality of articles 143, 144 and 313bis of the Civil Code. Article 143 defined marriage as "the union of one man and one woman", and article 313bis similarly defined concubinage as between "one man and one woman". Article 144 characterized marriage as an institution whose purpose was "perpetuating the species". The amparo was approved by a court on 29 August 2014, and the couple married on 3 September 2014, making them the first same-sex couple to marry in Aguascalientes.
  
  A lesbian couple, Susana Ortega Guzmán and Mariana Martín Aguirre, applied for an amparo in May 2014 and received a favorable verdict on 2 September 2014. They married on 21 August 2015. On 1 September 2014, Julián Elizalde Peña, coordinator of the organization Colectivo SerGay de Aguascalientes, announced that a third amparo had been requested. Elizalde Peña announced that two more amparos were pending on 13 October 2014. In December 2016, another same-sex couple was granted an amparo to marry, and another was granted by the Fourth District Court to a lesbian couple on 25 January 2017. In late November 2017, four more amparos for same-sex marriage rights were approved by the courts. By December 2017, 14 same-sex couples had married in the state. That number increased to 23 in 2018, all via the amparo remedy.
  
  ### Legislative proposals
  
  A civil union bill was first proposed in Aguascalientes in 2010 by Deputy Nora Ruvalcaba Gámez. The measure would have established a legal institution with several of the rights, benefits, obligations and responsibilities of marriage. Opposition from the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) and the National Action Party (PAN) crippled its passage in Congress.
  
  In September 2014, Deputy Cuauhtemoc Escobedo Tejad from the Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD) announced that Governor Carlos Lozano de la Torre would introduce a civil union bill and possibly a same-sex marriage bill to the Congress of Aguascalientes. Escobeda Tejada further announced that if Lozano de la Torre did not introduce a bill, he would do so himself. On 4 November 2014, Escobedo Tejada presented a civil union proposal to Congress, defining the civil partnership as "living together, forming a heritage, having children if they wish, and dealing with situations that arise for a couple." A citizens' initiative for same-sex marriage had been introduced to Congress a few weeks prior to his bill. Debate on three initiatives with different schemes for marriage and civil unions began on 21 November 2014.
  
  On 15 June 2016, Martha Márquez Alvarado, a congresswoman from the National Action Party, indicated that she was preparing another civil union proposal and would present it to Congress when ready. In April 2017, the State Human Rights Commission announced it would introduce a new same-sex marriage bill, and in October 2017 another marriage bill was introduced to Congress by PRD Deputy Josefina Moreno Pérez. In April 2018, the National Action Party, which holds a majority of seats in the Congress of Aguascalientes, announced it would oppose all the proposed same-sex marriage and civil union bills, and would not allow legislative hearings on any of them.
  
  ### Action of unconstitutionality (2018–2019)
  
  In 2018, the National Human Rights Commission filed an action of unconstitutionality (acción de inconstitucionalidad; docketed 40/2018) against articles 143, 144 and 313bis of the Civil Code. The Congress of Aguascalientes had recently amended state family law but while doing so did not repeal the state's ban on same-sex marriage. The Commission took this opportunity to file the action of unconstitutionality.
  
  On 2 April 2019, the full bench of the Mexican Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the three articles in question were void and unconstitutional, determining that banning same-sex couples from marrying violates Articles 1 and 4 of the Constitution of Mexico. Article 1 of the Constitution states that "any form of discrimination, based on ethnic or national origin, gender, age, disabilities, social status, medical conditions, religion, opinions, sexual orientation, marital status, or any other form, which violates the human dignity or seeks to annul or diminish the rights and freedoms of the people, is prohibited.", and Article 4 relates to matrimonial equality, stating that "man and woman are equal under the law. The law shall protect the organization and development of the family." The court also ruled that section 1 of article 73 of the Law on the Security of Social Services for Public Servants (Spanish: Ley de Seguridad de Servicios Sociales para los Servidores Públicos) was unconstitutional in limiting social security and health care benefits to opposite-sex married or cohabiting couples.
  
  The ruling came into effect once Congress was officially notified and upon publication in the Official Gazette of the Federation (Diario Oficial de la Federación) on 16 August 2019. Prior to this date, the civil registry had already begun processing marriage applications from same-sex couples and issuing marriage licenses. A couple applied to marry the same day as the ruling was handed down, and wed shortly thereafter. On 6 April 2019, a same-sex couple, together for 11 years, wed in a Masonic ceremony in Aguascalientes City.
  
  ## Marriage statistics
  
  The following table shows the number of same-sex marriages performed in Aguascalientes since legalization in 2019 as reported by the National Institute of Statistics and Geography.
  
  Number of marriages performed in Aguascalientes :
  
  | Year | Same-sex | Same-sex | Same-sex | Opposite-sex | Total | % same-sex |
  | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
  | Year | Female | Male | Total | Opposite-sex | Total | % same-sex |
  | 2019 | 44 | 29 | 73 | 6,852 | 6,925 | 1.05% |
  | 2020 | 37 | 22 | 59 | 4,730 | 4,789 | 1.23% |
  | 2021 | 58 | 30 | 88 | 6,705 | 6,793 | 1.30% |
  
  ## Public opinion
  
  A 2017 opinion poll conducted by Gabinete de Comunicación Estratégica found that 50% of Aguascalientes residents supported same-sex marriage, while 45% were opposed.
  
  According to a 2018 survey by the National Institute of Statistics and Geography, 36% of the Aguascalientes public opposed same-sex marriage.
  
  