title: Non-simultaneity
text: # Non-simultaneity
  
  Non-simultaneity or nonsynchronism (German: Ungleichzeitigkeit, sometimes also translated as non-synchronicity) is a concept in the writings of Ernst Bloch which denotes the time lag, or uneven temporal development, produced in the social sphere by the processes of capitalist modernization and/or the incomplete nature of those processes. The term, especially in the phrase "the simultaneity of the non-simultaneous", has been used subsequently in predominantly Marxist theories of modernity, world-systems, postmodernity and globalization.
  
  ## In the work of Ernst Bloch
  
  The phrase "the non-simultaneity of the simultaneous" (die 'Ungleichzeitigket' des Gleichzeitigen) was first used by the German art historian Wilhelm Pinder in his 1926 book Das Problem der Generation in der Kunstgeschichte Europas ("The Problem of Generation in European Art History").
  
  Bloch's principal use of the term "non-simultaneity" was in an essay from 1932 which attempted to explain the rise and popularity of Nazism in Germany in the light of the capitalist economic crisis of the Great Depression and which became a chapter of his influential 1935 study Heritage of our Times (Erbschaft dieser Zeit). The essay's central idea is that heterogeneous stages of social and economic development coexist simultaneously in 1930s Germany. Because of uneven modernization, Bloch argues, there remained in Germany, "this classical land of non-simultaneity", significant traces of pre-capitalist relations of production:
  
     "Not all people exist in the same Now. They do so only externally, by virtue of the fact that they may all be seen today. But that does not mean that they are living at the same time with others.
     Rather, they carry earlier things with them, things which are intricately involved. One has one's times according to where one stands corporeally, above all in terms of classes. Times older than the present continue to effect older strata; here it is easy to return or dream one's way back to older times. [...] In general, different years resound in the one that has just been recorded and prevails. Moreover, they do not emerge in a hidden way as previously but rather, they contradict the Now in a very peculiar way, awry, from the rear. [...] Many earlier forces, from quite a different Below, are beginning to slip between. [...]
     Over and above a great deal of false nonsynchronism [non-simultaneity] there is this one in particular: Nature, and more than that, the ghost of history comes very easily to the desperate peasant, to the bankrupt petty bourgeois; the depression which releases the ghost takes place in a country with a particularly large amount of pre-capitalist material. It is important to ask whether Germany is not more undeveloped, even more vulcanic than, for instance, France, in terms of its power. Certainly it has not formed and evened out capitalist ratio nearly as synchronously."
  
  The text signals that to some extent these ideas derive from Marx's Critique of Political Economy, and in particular his notion of "the unequal rate of development", or "uneven development". Marx had also used the term "simultaneity" (Gleichzeitigkeit) in his explanation of the concentration of production processes under the demands of commodity production in the first volume of Das Kapital (see below). But Bloch's argument is also an attempt to counter simplistic interpretations of Hegelian and Marxist teleology, by introducing what he terms "the polyrhythm and the counterpoint of such dialectics", a "polyphonous", "multispatial" and "multitemporal" dialectics, not in order to deny the possibility of proletarian revolution, but in order to "gain additional revolutionary force from the incomplete wealth of the past":
  
     The still subversive and utopian contents in the relations of people to people and nature, which are not past because they were never quite attained, can only be of use in this way. These contents are, as it were, the goldbearing gravel in the course of previous labor processes and their superstructures in the form of works. Polyphonous dialectics, as a dialectics of the "contradictions" which are more concentrated today than ever, has in any case enough questions and contents in capitalism that are not yet "superseded by the course of economic development".
  
  This argument touches on the need to understand the spatial dynamics of capitalism that would be taken up in the 1960s and 1970s by Marxist urban philosopher Henri Lefebvre, with his analysis of the dialectics of (urban) space, and his work on "rhythmanalysis". It also anticipates the study of the subaltern's "contradicted" relationship to Western modernity undertaken by subaltern studies and postcolonial theory (see below).
  
  ## The simultaneity of the non-simultaneous
  
  Although often attributed to "Nonsynchronism and the Obligation to its Dialectics", the phrase die Gleichzeitigkeit des Ungleichzeitigen ("the simultaneity of the non-simultaneous" or "the synchronism/synchronicity of the nonsynchronous") — i.e., a reversal of Pinder's "non-simultaneity of the simultaneous" — is not explicitly used in this work. Bloch elaborates instead the idea of synchronous and nonsynchronous contradictions with "the Now". By "synchronous contradiction" he means those forces of contradiction (to capital) that capitalism itself generates, principally the contemporary industrialized proletariat (as analysed by Marx). "Nonsynchronous contradiction" refers to the atavistic survival of an "uncompleted past which has not yet been 'sublated' by capitalism" as discussed above.
  
  ## In the work of Marx
  
  Part of a series on :
  
  Marxism :
  
  Theoretical works
  
  Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844
  
  The German Ideology
  
  Wage Labour and Capital
  
  The Communist Manifesto
  
  The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte
  
  Grundrisse der Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie
  
  A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy
  
  Das Kapital
  
  Critique of the Gotha Programme
  
  Dialectics of Nature
  
  Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism
  
  The State and Revolution
  
  History and Class Consciousness
  
  On Contradiction
  
  Prison Notebooks
  
  Dialectic of Enlightenment
  
  The Wretched of the Earth
  
  Guerrilla Warfare
  
  Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses
  
  Women, Race and Class
  
  Empire (Hardt and Negri book) :
  
  Philosophy
  
  Dialectical materialism
  
  Philosophy of nature :
  
  Critique of political economy
  
  Capital (accumulation)
  
  Crisis theory
  
  Commodity
  
  Concrete and abstract labor
  
  Factors of production
  
  Falling profit-rate tendency
  
  Means of production
  
  Mode of production
  
  Asiatic
  
  Capitalist
  
  Socialist
  
  Productive forces
  
  Scientific socialism
  
  Surplus product
  
  Socially necessary labour time
  
  Value-form
  
  Wage labour :
  
  Sociology
  
  Alienation
  
  Base and superstructure
  
  Bourgeoisie
  
  Class
  
  Class consciousness
  
  Class struggle
  
  Classless society
  
  Commodity fetishism
  
  Communist society
  
  Critique of political economy
  
  Cultural hegemony
  
  Democracy
  
  Dictatorship of the proletariat
  
  Exploitation
  
  Human nature
  
  Ideology
  
  Immiseration
  
  Imperialism
  
  Lumpenproletariat
  
  Metabolic rift
  
  Proletariat
  
  Private property
  
  Relations of production
  
  Reification
  
  State theory
  
  Working class :
  
  History
  
  Philosophy in the Soviet Union
  
  Primitive accumulation
  
  Proletarian revolution
  
  World revolution
  
  Theory of historical trajectory :
  
  Aspects
  
  Aesthetics
  
  Archaeology
  
  Criminology
  
  Cultural analysis
  
  Cultural Studies
  
  Ethics
  
  Film theory
  
  Geography
  
  Historiography
  
  Literary criticism
  
  Marxism and religion
  
  Sociology
  
  Philosophy :
  
  Orthodox variants
  
  Analytical
  
  Black
  
  Classical
  
  Feminist
  
  Hegelian
  
  Humanist
  
  Instrumental
  
  Leninism
  
  Trotskyism
  
  Maoism
  
  Neo
  
  Open
  
  Post
  
  Structural
  
  Western
  
  Marxism–Leninism
  
  Anti-revisionism
  
  Marxism–Leninism–Maoism
  
  Gonzalo Thought
  
  Socialism with Chinese characteristics
  
  Titoism :
  
  Left communist variants
  
  Bordigism
  
  Communization
  
  Council communism :
  
  Libertarian variants
  
  Autonomism
  
  Situationism :
  
  Other variants
  
  Austromarxism
  
  Eurocommunism
  
  Neo-Gramscianism
  
  Neue Marx-Lektüre
  
  Revisionist :
  
  People
  
  Marx
  
  Engels
  
  Morris
  
  Lafargue
  
  Kautsky
  
  Plekhanov
  
  Du Bois
  
  Connolly
  
  Lenin
  
  Luxemburg
  
  Kollontai
  
  Hilferding
  
  Trotsky
  
  Grossman
  
  Zinoviev
  
  Bloch
  
  Lukács
  
  Korsch
  
  Bukharin
  
  Bordiga
  
  Ho
  
  Serge
  
  Gramsci
  
  Pashukanis
  
  Nosaka
  
  Benjamin
  
  Mao
  
  Mariátegui
  
  Toledano
  
  Horkheimer
  
  Volpe
  
  Dutt
  
  Brecht
  
  Marcuse
  
  Bordiga
  
  Fromm
  
  Neumann
  
  Lefebvre
  
  James
  
  Adorno
  
  Padmore
  
  Sartre
  
  Deutscher
  
  Beauvoir
  
  Nkrumah
  
  Sweezy
  
  Emmanuel
  
  Hill
  
  Bettelheim
  
  Draper
  
  Jones
  
  Hobsbawm
  
  Althusser
  
  Hinton
  
  Williams
  
  Freire
  
  Mandel
  
  Sivanandan
  
  Miliband
  
  Lefort
  
  Cabral
  
  Thompson
  
  Bauman
  
  Fanon
  
  Kosik
  
  Berger
  
  Castro
  
  Guevara
  
  Heller
  
  Guattari
  
  Mészáros
  
  O'Connor
  
  Wallerstein
  
  Mies
  
  Tronti
  
  Debord
  
  Amin
  
  Hall
  
  Nairn
  
  Parenti
  
  Negri
  
  Jameson
  
  Dussel
  
  Harvey
  
  Laclau
  
  Bahro
  
  Poulantzas
  
  Vattimo
  
  Badiou
  
  Altvater
  
  Anderson
  
  Löwy
  
  Resnick
  
  Vogel
  
  Sison
  
  Easthope
  
  Rancière
  
  Berman
  
  Przeworski
  
  Blackburn
  
  Cohen
  
  Therborn
  
  Ahmad
  
  Losurdo
  
  Ture
  
  Postone
  
  Rodney
  
  Spivak
  
  Newton
  
  Sakai
  
  Wood
  
  Federici
  
  Wolff
  
  Balibar
  
  Eagleton
  
  Hartsock
  
  Rowbotham
  
  Mouffe
  
  Geras
  
  Brenner
  
  Davis
  
  Cleaver
  
  Bishop
  
  Haraway
  
  Panitch
  
  Clarke
  
  Jessop
  
  Davis
  
  Wright
  
  Fraser
  
  Holloway
  
  Screpanti
  
  McLaren
  
  Tamás
  
  Hampton
  
  Cano
  
  Žižek
  
  Sankara
  
  Hennessy
  
  McDonnell
  
  Douzinas
  
  Cockshott
  
  Roediger
  
  Foster
  
  West
  
  Ghandy
  
  Marcos
  
  Tarasov
  
  Prashad
  
  Merrifield
  
  Varoufakis
  
  Kelley
  
  Linera
  
  Fisher
  
  Li
  
  Barker
  
  Coulthard
  
  Malm
  
  Seymour
  
  Toscano
  
  Bhattacharya
  
  Moufawad-Paul
  
  Srnicek
  
  Horvat
  
  Hamza
  
  Saito :
  
  Journals
  
  Capital & Class
  
  Capitalism Nature Socialism
  
  Catalyst
  
  Constellations
  
  Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory
  
  Historical Materialism
  
  Mediations
  
  Monthly Review
  
  New Left Review
  
  Race & Class
  
  Rethinking Marxism
  
  Science & Society
  
  Socialism and Democracy
  
  Socialist Register :
  
  Related topics
  
  21st-century communist theorists
  
  Anarchism
  
  Anarcho-communism
  
  Creative destruction
  
  Critical theory
  
  Criticism of Marxism
  
  Communism
  
  Communalism
  
  Economic determinism
  
  Historical determinism
  
  History of communism
  
  Left-wing politics
  
  Marxian economics
  
  New Left
  
  Old Left
  
  Municipalism
  
  Political ecology
  
  Radical democracy
  
  Social democracy
  
  Socialism
  
  Authoritarian
  
  Democratic
  
  Libertarian
  
  Market
  
  Reformist
  
  Revolutionary
  
  Utopian
  
  Soviet democracy
  
  Left-wing populism
  
  Universal class
  
  Vulgar Marxism
  
  Economism
  
  Worker cooperative
  
  Workers' council :
  
  Related categories Karl Marx
  
  Philosophy of history :
  
  Outline
  
   Communism portal
  
   Philosophy portal
  
   Socialism portal :
  
  vte :
  
  After the posthumous publication of Marx's Grundrisse in 1939, it became clear that a dialectic of simultaneity and non-simultaneity had been implicit in Marx's thinking on the spatiality and geography of capitalism. Das Kapital (1867–94) had argued on the one hand that the money form had arisen in order to allow for non-simultaneous or delayed exchange of commodities (as opposed to face-to-face bartering), and on the other that "simultaneity" (Gleichzeitigkeit) was a requirement of (and a phenomenon produced by) the demands of commodity production (the capitalist has to be able to synchronize the disparate activities required to manufacture a product). The powerful spatio-temporal effects of the dual demands of exchange and commodity production were summarized in the Grundrisse with the concept of "the annihilation of space by time", i.e. with the imposition of simultaneity or synchronicity over spatial separation and geographical diversity:
  
     The more production comes to rest on exchange value, hence on exchange, the more important do the physical conditions of exchange — the means of communication and transport — become for the costs of circulation. Capital by its nature drives beyond every spatial barrier. Thus the creation of the physical conditions of exchange — of the means of communication and transport — the annihilation of space by time — becomes an extraordinary necessity for it.
  
  At the same time, Marx showed himself to be acutely aware of the resistances to this overcoming of spatio-temporal barriers, and, more importantly, to the fact that capitalism itself generates its own resistances, or contradictions, to the universalization of its mode of production:
  
     But from the fact that capital posits every such limit as a barrier and hence gets ideally beyond it, it does not by any means follow that it has really overcome it, and, since every such barrier contradicts its character, its production moves in contradictions which are constantly overcome but just as constantly posited. Furthermore. The universality towards which it irresistibly strives encounters barriers in its own nature, which will, at a certain stage of its development, allow it to be recognized as being itself the greatest barrier to this tendency, and hence will drive towards its own suspension.
  
  Due to the late publication of the Grundrisse, Bloch would not have been acquainted with these precise words at the time of the writing of "Nonsynchronism", although the similarity of concepts relating to the way in which capitalism posits its own (simultaneous and non-simultaneous) contradictions to production ultimately derives from Das Kapital as discussed above.
  
  ## Subsequent use
  
  ### In structural Marxism
  
  The problematic of simultaneity/non-simultaneity and synchronism/nonsynchronism was taken up in the work of post-Second-World-War Marxist sociologists and philosophers, such as Theodor Adorno, Nicos Poulantzas, Louis Althusser and Étienne Balibar.
  
  As structural Marxists, Althusser and Balibar were concerned to understand how "the problems of diachrony" in the transition from one mode of production to another could be related to the overall structure or "synchrony" of production. In Reading Capital (1970), they argue, in similar vein to Bloch, that the succession of different modes of production as theorized by Marx is not a teleological process driven by "the forward march of the productive forces", but that instead periods of transition are marked by "the coexistence of several modes of production":
  
     Thus it seems that the dislocation [décalage] between the connexions and instances in transition periods merely reflects the coexistence of two (or more) modes of production in a single 'simultaneity ', and the dominance of one of them over the other. This confirms the fact that the problems of diachrony, too, must be thought within the problematic of a theoretical 'synchrony': the problems of the transition and of the forms of the transition from one mode of production to another are problems of a more general synchrony than that of the mode of production itself, englobing several systems and their relations.
  
  For the Greek political sociologist and structural Marxist Nicos Poulantzas, forms of socio-cultural difference such as "territory and historico-cultural tradition [...] produce the uneven development of capitalism as an unevenness of historical moments affecting those differentiated, classified and distinct spaces that are called nations". In State, Power, Socialism (1978), he argues that such differences are in fact a precondition for global capitalist development.
  
  ### Henri Lefebvre and Ernest Mandel
  
  Althusser and Balibar's contemporary, Henri Lefebvre, was sharply critical of what he saw as these writers' fetishization of a fixed, abstract and purely structural notion of "general" synchronic space subsuming diachronic or historical processes. By contrast, Lefebvre's own "turbulent spatiality" which "would restore geography to history, history to geography", together with his rhythmanalysis, shares at least a common vocabulary with Bloch's multispatial and multitemporal dialectics. Lefebvre was also one of the first commentators to link uneven development to the production of space on a global scale: "The law of unevenness of growth and development, so far from becoming obsolete, is becoming world-wide in its application — or, more precisely is presiding over the globalization of a world market".
  
  Meanwhile, Belgian Marxist Ernest Mandel was developing, at the same time as Lefebvre, a characterization of "late capitalism" which also refuses the idea that (global) capitalism produces homogeneity. Instead, he argues, capitalism must produce "underdevelopment" in order to maximize the production of surplus profit:
  
     The entire capitalist system thus appears as a hierarchical structure of different levels of productivity, and as the outcome of the uneven and combined development of states, regions, branches of industry and firms, unleashed by the quest for surplus-profit. It forms an integrated unity, but it is an integrated unity of non-homogeneous parts, and it is precisely the unity that here determines the lack of homogeneity. In this whole system development and underdevelopment reciprocally determine each other, for while the quest for surplus-profits constitutes the prime motive power behind the mechanisms of growth, surplus-profit can only be achieved at the expense of less productive regions and branches of production.
  
  ### In Marxist sociology and geography
  
  Thinkers as diverse as Immanuel Wallerstein, with his world-systems theory, David Harvey with his analysis of the Limits to Capital (1982) and time–space compression, and Harvey's erstwhile student Neil Smith with his Uneven Development, can all be seen to develop one or other aspect of this line of Marxist thought. The early work of Anthony Giddens and in particular his concept of "time-space distanciation", e.g. in his Critique of Historical Materialism (1981), has also been influential in this area.
  
  ### In theories of modernity and postmodernity
  
  Perhaps the most famous use of Bloch's terminology to date is that made by the Marxist cultural critic Fredric Jameson when describing the economic basis of modernism in Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (1991):
  
     Modernism must thus be seen as uniquely corresponding to an uneven moment of social development, or to what Ernst Bloch called the "simultaneity of the nonsimultaneous," the "synchronicity of the nonsynchronous" (Gleichzeitigkeit des Ungleichzeitigen): the coexistence of realities from radically different moments of history — handicrafts alongside the great cartels, peasant fields with the Krupp factories or the Ford plant in the distance.
  
  Jameson goes on, however, to argue that with the advent of postmodernity and its attendant postmodernisms, the "uneven moment" of modernity has been completely replaced by the mass standardization and homogenization of the third, multinational, phase of capitalist development:
  
     the postmodern must be characterized as a situation in which the survival, the residue, the holdover, the archaic, has finally been swept away without a trace. In the postmodern, then, the past itself has disappeared (along with the well-known "sense of the past" or historicity and collective memory). Where its buildings still remain, renovation and restoration allow them to be transferred to the present in their entirety as those other, very different and postmodern things called simulacra. Everything is now organized and planned; nature has been triumphantly blotted out, along with peasants, petit-bourgeois commerce, handicraft, feudal aristocracies and imperial bureaucracies. Ours is a more homogeneously modernized condition; we no longer are encumbered with the embarrassment of non-simultaneities and non-synchronicities. Everything has reached the same hour on the great clock of development or rationalization (at least from the perspective of the "West"). This is the sense in which we can affirm, either that modernism is characterized by a situation of incomplete modernization, or that postmodernism is more modern than modernism itself.
  
  ### In postcolonial theory
  
  Subaltern studies and postcolonial theory, however, tend to maintain that the idea of a globally homogenized space, even under postmodernity, is undercut precisely by Bloch's "nonsynchronous remnants" and diverse temporalities. Homi K. Bhabha, commenting on Jameson, claims that
  
     What is manifestly new about this version of international space and its social (in)visibility is its temporal measure [...] The non-synchronous temporality of global and national cultures opens up a cultural space — a third space — where the negotiation of incommensurable differences creates a tension peculiar to borderline existences.
  
  Postcolonial anthropologist Arjun Appadurai makes a similar point in his book Modernity at Large (1996) via an implicit critique of Wallerstein: "The new global cultural economy has to be seen as a complex, overlapping, disjunctive order that cannot any longer be understood in terms of existing center-periphery models (even those that might account for multiple centers and peripheries)".
  
  