title: De facto corporation and corporation by estoppel
text: # De facto corporation and corporation by estoppel
  
  This article is part of a series on :
  
  Corporate law :
  
  By jurisdiction
  
  Anguilla
  
  Australia
  
  BVI
  
  Canada
  
  Cayman Islands
  
  India
  
  South Africa
  
  UK
  
  United States
  
  Vietnam
  
  European Union
  
  France
  
  Germany :
  
  General corporate forms
  
  Company
  
  Conglomerate
  
  Cooperative
  
  Corporation
  
  Holding company
  
  Joint-stock
  
  Partnership
  
  General
  
  Limited
  
  Limited liability
  
  Private limited
  
  Shell corporation
  
  Sole proprietorship :
  
  Corporate forms by jurisdiction
  
  European Union
  
  Societas (SE)
  
  Societas cooperativa (SCE)
  
  Societas privata (SPE)
  
  Societas unius personae (SUP)
  
  Economic interest grouping (EEIG)
  
  UK / Ireland / Commonwealth
  
  Charitable incorporated organisation (England and Wales) (CIO)
  
  Scottish charitable incorporated organisation (SCIO)
  
  Community interest company (CIC)
  
  Industrial and provident society (IPS)
  
  Limited company (Ltd.)
  
  by guarantee
  
  by shares
  
  proprietary
  
  public
  
  Unlimited company
  
  United States
  
  Benefit corporation
  
  C corporation
  
  Limited liability company (LLC)
  
  Low-profit LLC
  
  Series LLC
  
  Limited liability limited partnership (LLLP)
  
  S corporation
  
  Delaware corporation / statutory trust
  
  Massachusetts business trust
  
  Nevada corporation
  
  Others
  
  Aktiebolag (AB)
  
  Aktiengesellschaft (AG)
  
  Ansvarlig selskap (ANS)
  
  Aktieselskab (A/S)
  
  Aksjeselskap (AS)
  
  Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (GmbH)
  
  Kabushiki gaisha (K.K.)
  
  Naamloze vennootschap (N.V.)
  
  Osakeyhtiö (Oy)
  
  S.A.
  
  Société à responsabilité limitée (SARL)
  
  more... :
  
  Doctrines
  
  Business judgment rule
  
  Corporate governance
  
  De facto and estoppel corporations
  
  Internal affairs doctrine
  
  Limited liability
  
  Tag-along right
  
  Drag-along right
  
  Piercing the corporate veil
  
  Rochdale Principles
  
  Ultra vires :
  
  Related areas
  
  Civil procedure
  
  Contract
  
  Corporate registers :
  
  Company portal
  
  Law portal :
  
  vte :
  
  De facto corporation and corporation by estoppel are both terms that are used by courts in most common law jurisdictions to describe circumstances in which a business organization that has failed to become a de jure corporation (a corporation by law) will nonetheless be treated as a corporation, thereby shielding shareholders from liability.
  
  ## De facto corporation
  
  In order for a de facto corporation to be created, the following elements must exist:
  
  * There must be an incorporation statute that lays out the various requirements under which legal incorporation can be accomplished;
  * There must have been a good faith attempt to comply with the statute by the intended incorporators (for example, if the articles of incorporation were mailed to the appropriate office, but addressed to the wrong person, lost in the mail, or not filed by the corporation by the time the corporation began acting in an official capacity);
  * There must have been an act made on the corporation's behalf by its purported officers or agents.
  
  If all of these requirements are met, then the business will be treated as a corporation for all purposes, except with respect to acts by the state itself. However, most states will not apply this doctrine to protect a person who was aware that the incorporation effort was defective at the time that they purported to act on behalf of the corporation.
  
  ## Corporation by estoppel
  
  Corporation by estoppel, on the other hand, applies against someone who operates a business as if it were a limited liability entity or corporation, irrespective of whether there was a good faith effort by the business to incorporate. The person doing business with such an entity, as if it were a limited liability entity or corporation, may later be estopped from arguing that it is not in fact a limited liability entity, in an attempt to reach the assets of the incorporators. For the same reason, defendants who had acted as a corporation will be estopped from denying liability as a corporation when sued by a plaintiff who had relied on the defendant's corporate form when dealing with the defendant.
  
  ## Differences between de facto corporation and corporation by estoppel
  
  Both doctrines are applicable in the contract context but the estoppel concept typically does not apply where tort liability is sought because knowledge of corporate existence is irrelevant to the commission of tort. The harm caused by a tortious act normally does not depend on knowledge, or lack thereof, of a corporation's existence.
  
  * This law-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
  * v
  * t
  * e
  