title: Codec listening test
text: # Codec listening test
  
  A codec listening test is a scientific study designed to compare two or more lossy audio codecs, usually with respect to perceived fidelity or compression efficiency.
  
  Most tests take the form of a double-blind comparison. Commonly used methods are known as "ABX" or "ABC/HR" or "MUSHRA". There are various software packages available for individuals to perform this type of testing themselves with minimal assistance.
  
  ## Testing methods
  
  ### ABX test
  
  In an ABX test, the listener has to identify an unknown sample X as being A or B, with A (usually the original) and B (usually the encoded version) available for reference. The outcome of a test must be statistically significant. This setup ensures that the listener is not biased by their expectations, and that the outcome is not likely to be the result of chance. If sample X cannot be determined reliably with a low p-value in a predetermined number of trials, then the null hypothesis cannot be rejected and it cannot be proved that there is a perceptible difference between samples A and B. This usually indicates that the encoded version will actually be transparent to the listener.
  
  ### ABC/HR test
  
  In an ABC/HR test, C is the original which is always available for reference. A and B are the original and the encoded version in randomized order. The listener must first distinguish the encoded version from the original (which is the Hidden Reference that the "HR" in ABC/HR stands for), prior to assigning a score as a subjective judgment of the quality. Different encoded versions can be compared against each other using these scores.
  
  ### MUSHRA
  
  In MUSHRA (MUltiple Stimuli with Hidden Reference and Anchor), the listener is presented with the reference (labeled as such), a certain number of test samples, a hidden version of the reference and one or more anchors. The purpose of the anchor(s) is to make the scale be closer to an "absolute scale", making sure that minor artifacts are not rated as having very bad quality.
  
  ## Results
  
  Many double-blind music listening tests have been carried out. The following table lists the results of several listening tests that have been published online. To obtain meaningful results, listening tests must compare codecs' performance at similar or identical bitrates, since the audio quality produced by any lossy encoder will be trivially improved by increasing the bitrate. If listeners cannot consistently distinguish a lossy encoder's output from the uncompressed original audio, then it may be concluded that the codec has achieved transparency.
  
  Popular formats compared in these tests include MP3, AAC (and extensions), Vorbis, Musepack, and WMA. The RealAudio Gecko, ATRAC3, QDesign, and mp3PRO formats appear in some tests, despite much lower adoption as of 2007. Many encoder and decoder implementations (both proprietary and open source) exist for some formats, such as MP3, which is the oldest and best-known format still in widespread use today.
  
  | Source | Dates | Formats | Bitrate (kbit/s) | Codecs | Musical genres | Samples | Listeners | Best Result | Comments |
  | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
  | ff123 | 2001 | multiple | ~128 | MP3: Lame 3.89beta --abr 134 -h --nspsytune—athtype 2 --lowpass 16—ns-bass -8 MP3: Xing within AudioCatalyst 2.1 128 kbit/s, high frequency mode disabled, simple stereo disabled AAC: Liquifier Pro 5.0.0 Beta 2, Build 24 streaming 128, equalization disabled, dynamics disabled, dual mono encoding disabled, audio bandwidth overridden by the program, set at 17995 Hz MPC: mppenc.exe version 1.7.9c -radio -ltq_gain 10 -tmn 12 -nmt 4.8 WMAv8: Windows Media Player 7.1 (version 7.01.00.3055); Wmadmoe.dll version 8.0.0.0371 128 kbit/s Ogg Vorbis: Oggdrop RC2 for Windows 32 128 kbit/s | | 1 | 16 | Musepack and AAC | |
  | ff123 | 2001 October - 2002 January | multiple | ~128 | MP3: Lame 3.89beta --abr 134 -h --nspsytune—athtype 2 --ns-bass -8 MP3: Xing within AudioCatalyst 2.1 128 kbit/s, high frequency mode disabled, simple stereo disabled AAC: Liquifier Pro 5.0.0 Beta 2, Build 24 streaming 128, equalization disabled, dynamics disabled, dual mono encoding disabled, audio bandwidth overridden by the program, set at 17995 Hz MPC: mppenc.exe version 1.7.9c -radio -ltq_gain 10 -tmn 12 -nmt 4.8 WMAv8: Windows Media Player 7.1 (version 7.01.00.3055); Wmadmoe.dll version 8.0.0.0371 128 kbit/s Vorbis: **Oggdrop pre-RC3 for Windows 32; from CVS (10/26/01) 128 kbit/s | Various | 3 | 25-28 | Musepack or Vorbis | |
  | ff123 | 2002 July | multiple | ~64 | Ogg Vorbis 1.0 -b 64—managed Ogg Vorbis 1.0 -q 0 MMJB 7.2 mp3PRO 64 WMA8 at 64 kbit/s (using WMP 7.1 to encode) QuickTime 6.0 MPEG-4 AAC Low complexity at 64 kbit/s | Various | 12 | 24-41 | mp3PRO | Both Vorbis variants were a close second. |
  | Roberto Amorim | 2003 June | AAC | 128 CBR | Psytel AAC-enc 2.15 -br 128 Ahead/Nero 5.5.10.35 128 kbit/s CBR, high quality Sorenson Squeeze 3.5 (FhG Pro) 128 kbit/s Apple QuickTime 6.3 (Apple/Dolby) 128 kbit/s high quality FAAC 1.17b -a 64 (64 kbit/s/channel, ABR) | Various | 10 | 11-18 | QuickTime | |
  | Roberto Amorim | 2003 July | multiple | ~128 | Apple QuickTime 6.3 MP4 encoder 128 kbit/s high quality LAME MP3 Encoder 3.90.3 --alt-preset 128 Musepack 1.14 --quality 4 --xlevel Ogg Vorbis post-1.0 CVS -q 4.25 Windows Media Audio v9 PRO bitrate-managed 2-pass VBR 128 kbit/s | Various | 12 | 14-24 | Musepack | AAC, WMA, and Vorbis tied for close second |
  | Roberto Amorim | 2003 September | multiple | ~64 | Ahead/Nero 6.0.0.15 HE AAC VBR profile Streaming :: Medium, high quality Ogg Vorbis post-1.0 CVS -q 0 mp3PRO (from Adobe Audition 1.0) VBR quality 40, Current Codec, allow M/S and IS, allow narrowing, no CRC Real Audio Gecko (from Real Producer 9.0.1) 64 kbit/s Windows Media Audio v9 VBR quality 50 QuickTime 6.3 AAC LC 64 kbit/s, Best Quality | Various | 12 | 30-43 | Nero HE-AAC | This test showed that listeners preferred 128 kbit/s MP3 audio encoded by LAME to all the tested codecs at 64 kbit/s, with greater than 99% confidence: "No codec delivers the marketing plot [sic] of same quality as MP3 at half the bitrates." |
  | Roberto Amorim | 2004 January | MP3 | ~128 | LAME encoder 3.95 --preset 128 FhG MP3 encoder from Adobe Audition 1.0 VBR quality 40, "Current - Best" codec. Apple iTunes 4.2 MP3 112 kbit/s VBR, Highest quality, joint stereo, smart encoding GOGO-no-coda 3.12 -b 128 -a -q 0 Audioactive Encoder 2.04 128 kbit/s High Quality Xing MP3 Encoder 1.5 VBR quality normal | Various | 12 | 11-22 | LAME | The author noted that the results may have been affected by the use of an outdated version of the Xing encoder and non-optimal settings for ITunes. |
  | Roberto Amorim | 2004 February | AAC | ~128 | Ahead/Nero AAC-enc v 2.6.2.0 -internet profile, high quality, LC Apple iTunes 4.2 (Apple/QuickTime) 128 kbit/s Compaact! 1.2beta3 (zPlane/HHI) VBR 5, high quality, LC FAAC 1.23.5 -q 115 Real Producer 10 beta (CodingTechnologies) 128 kbit/s | Various | 12 | 19-29 | iTunes | Open-source FAAC codec improved greatly since previous test |
  | Roberto Amorim | 2004 May | multiple | ~128 | LAME encoder 3.96 -V5—athaa-sensitivity 1 Apple iTunes 4.2 128 kbit/s AAC Ogg Vorbis aoTuV tuning b2 -q 4.35 Musepack 1.14b --quality 4.15—xlevel Sony Atrac3 132 kbit/s Microsoft WMA9 Std Bitrate VBR 128 kbit/s | Various | 18 | 12-27 | aoTuV (Vorbis) and Musepack | |
  | Roberto Amorim | 2004 June | multiple | 32 CBR | LAME encoder 3.96 -b 32 Nero Ahead HE AAC+PS 32 kbit/s CBR High Quality Ogg Vorbis post-1.0.1CVS --managed -b 32 resampled with SSRC Real Audio 32 kbit/s stereo music codec in Helix Producer 10 QDesign Music Codec 2 Pro 32 kbit/s at 32 kHz, Quality mode Microsoft WMA9 Std 32 kbit/s at 32 kHz mp3PRO 32 kbit/s at 32 kHz, in Adobe Audition 1.5 | Various | 18 | 47-77 | Nero HE-AAC | |
  | HydrogenAudio user "guruboolez" | 2004 July | multiple | ~175 | MPC: musepack -standard MP3: LAME 3.97 alpha -V 3; -V 2 Ogg Vorbis: megamix -q 6,00; -q 6,99; -q 5,50 | Classical | 18 | 1 | Musepack | |
  | HydrogenAudio user "guruboolez" | 2005 August | multiple | ~180 | AAC: Faac 1.24.1. Release date: end 2004 (?). Setting: -q175 AAC: Nero Digital aacenc32 v.3.2.0.15. Release date: June 2005. Setting: -streaming (high/default encoder). MP3: LAME 3.97 alpha 11. Release date: July 2005. Setting: -V2—vbr-new MPC: mppenc 1.15v. Release date: march 2005. Setting: --quality 5 Ogg Vorbis: aoTuV beta 4 based on 1.1.1. Release date: July 2005. Setting: -q6,00 | Classical | 18 | 1 | aoTuV (Vorbis) | The author reflects on substantial improvements in Vorbis encoding since his previous test (above): "Vorbis is now –thanks to Aoyumi [creator of aoTuV]– an excellent audio format for 180 kbit/s encodings (and classical music)." |
  | gURuBoOleZZ (in French) | 2005 August | multiple | ~96 | AAC-LC: iTunes 4.9 / QuickTime 7.02 CBR 96 MP3: LAME 3.97 alpha 11 --abr 99 MPC: mppenc 1.14 --xlevel—quality 3 (or—thumb) Ogg Vorbis: aoTuV / LANCER beta 4 based on SVN 1.1.1 -q2,00 WMA Standard: WMA 9.1 CBR 96 | Classic, various | 150 classical, 35 various | 1 | aoTuV and AAC tied (classical), aoTuV (various) | The author selected each participating encoder by pitting multiple encoders against one another in an initial "Darwinian phase." For example, LAME was chosen as the representative MP3 encoder because it clearly outperformed four other MP3 encoders on a subset of the full sample corpus. |
  | Sebastian Mares | 2005 December | multiple | ~140 (nominal 128) | Nero AAC 3.1.0.2 VBR/Stereo - Streaming, 100-120 kbit/s [LC AAC] iTunes AAC 6.0.1.3 128 kbit/s, VBR LAME 3.97 Beta 2 -V5—vbr-new Ogg Vorbis AoTuV 4.51 Beta -q 4.25 WMA Professional 9.1 Quality-Based VBR, Q50 Shine 0.1.4 (Low Anchor) -b 128 | Various | 18 | 18-30 | 4-way tie (all except Shine) | "I think this test shows that with the current encoders, the quality at 128 kbit/s is very good... It's time to move to bitrates like 96 kbit/s or even lower (64 kbit/s)." |
  | Mp3-tech.org | 2006 March | AAC | 48 | 3gpp 6.3.0 48kbit/s CBR Coding Technologies - Winamp 5.2 beta 393 48kbit/s CBR HE-AAC Coding Technologies - Winamp 5.2 beta 393 48kbit/s CBR HEv2-AAC Nero Digital 4.9.9.95 48kbit/s ABR HE-AAC Nero Digital 4.9.9.96 48kbit/s ABR HEv2-AAC iTunes 6.0.2 (Low Anchor) 48kbit/s CBR LAME 3.97b2 (High Anchor) -V5 | Various | 18 | 10-20 | 5-way tie (all except anchors) | "... it seems that overall, plain HE-AAC might be better than HE-AAC v2 at this bitrate, but a lot more samples would be needed to be able to draw definitive conclusions regarding this. |
  | Sebastian Mares | 2006 November | multiple | ~48 | Ogg Vorbis AoTuV 5 Beta -q -1 WMA Professional 10 1-pass CBR, 48 kbit/s Nero HE-AAC May 26, 2006 -q 0.2 WMA Standard 9.2 Quality-Based VBR, Q10 iTunes AAC 7.0.2.16 48 kbit/s, CBR | Various | 20 | 22-34 | Nero HE-AAC | WMA Professional and aoTuV tied for second |
  | Sebastian Mares | 2007 July | multiple | ~64 | Ogg Vorbis AoTuV 5 Beta -q 0 WMA Professional 10 1-pass CBR, 64 kbit/s Nero HE-AAC Jul 20 2007 -q 0.24 | Various | 18 | 21-33 | Nero Digital and WMA Professional | |
  | Sebastian Mares | 2008 October | MP3 | ~128 | LAME 3.98.2 -V5.7 LAME 3.97 -V5—vbr-new iTunes 8.0.1.11 112 kbit/s, VBR, highest quality, joint stereo, smart encoding, filter below 10 Hz Fraunhofer IIS mp3surround CL encoder v1.5 -br 0 -m 4 -q 1 -vbri -ofl Helix v5.1 2005.08.09 -X2 -U2 -V60 l3enc 0.99a (Low Anchor) -br 128000 -mod 1 | Various | 14 | 26-39 | 5-way tie (all except L3enc) | "The quality at 128 kbps is very good and MP3 encoders improved a lot since the last test." Also notes that Fraunhofer and Helix codecs are several times faster at encoding than LAME, although virtually identical in terms of perceived audio quality. |
  | HydrogenAudio user IgorC (March/April 2011) | 2011 March | multiple | ~64 | Ogg Vorbis AoTuV 6.02 Beta -q 0.1 Apple HE-AAC constrained VBR, high quality, 64 kbit/s CELT complexity 10, VBR 67.5 kbit/s Nero HE-AAC -q 0.245 | Various | 30 | 25-13 | CELT / Opus | In results, CELT is referred to as Opus, its name when later standardized. |
  | HydrogenAudio user IgorC (July - August 2011) | 2011 July/August | LC-AAC | ~96 | Nero 1.5.4.0 -q 0.345 Apple QuickTime 7.6.9 true VBR, high quality, 96 kbit/s Apple QuickTime 7.6.9 constrained VBR, high quality, 96 kbit/s Fraunhofer IIS (via Winamp 5.62) VBR 3 Coding Technologies (via Winamp 5.61) CBR 100 kbps | Various | 20 | 25 | Apple QuickTime | |
  | HydrogenAudio user "Kamedo2" | 2013 May | MP3 | ~224 | Lame3100i -V2+ LAME 3.99.5 -V1 LAME 3.98.4 -q 0 -b 224 Helix v5.1 -X2 -U2 -V146 BladeEnc (Low Anchor) -quit -nocfg -224 | Various | 25 | 1 | 4-way tie (all except BladeEnc low anchor) | Most impairment grades rated between 4 (perceptible but not annoying) and 5 (imperceptible). Both speech samples transparent (p<0.02) except for the low anchor. |
  | HydrogenAudio user Kamedo2 (July/September 2014) | 2014 July - September | multiple | ~96 | AAC Apple QuickTime iTunes 11.2.2 (qaac 2.4.1) constrained VBR, high quality, 96 kbit/s Opus 1.1 VBR, 96 kbit/s Ogg Vorbis aoTuV Beta6.03 -q 2.2 (~96 kbps) MP3 LAME 3.99.5 VBR, -V 5 (~130 kbps, a well-known comparison but at higher bitrate) AAC FAAC v1.28 (Mid-low Anchor) -b 96 AAC FAAC v1.28 (Low Anchor) -q 30 (~52 kbps) | Various | 40 | 33 | Opus | In results Opus is clear winner, Apple AAC is second, Ogg Vorbis and higher-bitrate LAME MP3 are statistically tied in joint third place. FAAC, known to be inferior in advance, was used to discard bad results and as quality scale anchor. |
  | Cunningham and McGregor | 2019 February | multiple | 192 - 1411 | Uncompressed WAV MP3 CBR 192 kbps AAC 192 kbps CBR ACER low quality ~1023 kbps VBR ACER medium quality ~1130 kbps VBR ACER high quality ~1233 kbps VBR | Pop | 10 | 100 | 5-way tie (WAV, MP3, AAC, ACER HQ, ACER MQ) | Participants reported no perceived differences between the uncompressed, MP3, AAC, ACER high quality, and ACER medium quality compressed audio in terms of noise and distortions but that the ACER low quality format was perceived as being of lower quality. However, in terms of participants’ perceptions of the stereo field, all formats under test performed as well as each other, with no statistically significant differences. |
  | Source | Dates | Formats | Bitrate (kbit/s) | Codecs | Musical genres | Samples | Listeners | Best Result | Comments |
  