title: 2010 French Open – Legends under 45 doubles
text: # 2010 French Open – Legends under 45 doubles
  
  Paul Haarhuis and Cédric Pioline were the defending champion, but Haarhuis did not play this year. Pioline partnered up with Arnaud Boetsch, but they were eliminated by Goran Ivanišević and Michael Stich in the round-robin stage. Yevgeny Kafelnikov and Andriy Medvedev won in the final 6–1, 6–1 against Ivanisevic and Stich.
  
  ## Draw
  
  ### Key
  
  * Q = Qualifier
  * WC = Wild card
  * LL = Lucky loser
  * Alt = Alternate
  * SE = Special exempt
  * PR = Protected ranking
  * ITF = ITF entry
  * JE = Junior exempt
  * w/o = Walkover
  * r = Retired
  * d = Defaulted
  * SR = Special ranking
  
  ### Final
  
  | Final | Final | Final | Final | Final |
  | - | - | - | - | - |
  | 1 | Yevgeny Kafelnikov Andriy Medvedev | 6 | 6 | |
  | 2 | Goran Ivanišević Michael Stich | 1 | 1 | |
  
  ### Group A
  
  | | Kafelnikov Medvedev | Chang Costa | Bruguera Krajicek | RR W–L | Set W–L | Game W–L | Standings |
  | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
  | Yevgeny Kafelnikov Andriy Medvedev | | 6–0, 3–6, [10–7] | 4–6, 6–2, [12–10] | 2–0 | 4–2 | 21–14 | 1 |
  | Michael Chang Albert Costa | 0–6, 6–3, [7–10] | | 7–5, 3–6, [10–7] | 1–1 | 3–3 | 17–21 | 2 |
  | Sergi Bruguera Richard Krajicek | 6–4, 2–6, [10–12] | 5–7, 6–3, [7–10] | | 0–2 | 2–4 | 19–22 | 3 |
  
  Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 4. steering-committee decision.
  
  ### Group B
  
  | | Ivanišević Stich | Boetsch Pioline | Muster Woodforde | RR W–L | Set W–L | Game W–L | Standings |
  | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
  | Goran Ivanišević Michael Stich | | 6–4, 3–6, [10–8] | 6–4, 6–4 | 2–0 | 4–1 | 22–18 | 1 |
  | Arnaud Boetsch Cédric Pioline | 4–6, 6–3, [8–10] | | 6–2, 3–6, [12–10] | 1–1 | 3–3 | 20–18 | 2 |
  | Thomas Muster Mark Woodforde | 4–6, 4–6 | 2–6, 6–3, [10–12] | | 0–2 | 1–4 | 16–22 | 3 |
  
  Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 4. steering-committee decision.
  
  