title: Sharplin v Henderson
text: # Sharplin v Henderson
  
  Sharplin v Henderson [1990] 2 NZLR 134 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the requirement under section 7(4)(b) of the Contractual Remedies Act 1970 that a breach of a contract must be "substantial" for a contract to be cancelled.
  
  ## Background
  
  Sharplin purchased a Tauranga orchard from Henderson.
  
  After the sale, it was discovered that the real estate agent had misrepresented that 900 trees belonged to the property, representing 25% of the property.
  
  Sharplin sued for misrepresentation.
  
  ## Held
  
  The misrepresentation was substantial, and relief was granted.
  
  