title: Gringo justice
text: # Gringo justice
  
  Part of a series on :
  
  Chicanos and Mexican Americans :
  
  Terms
  
  Identity
  
  Chola/o
  
  La Raza
  
  Pachuca
  
  Pachuco
  
  Pinta/o
  
  Xicanx
  
  Concepts
  
  Anti-Mexican sentiment :
  
  History
  
  Early-American Period
  
  Josefa Segovia
  
  Las Gorras Blancas
  
  Mexican–American War
  
  Mutualista
  
  San Elizario Salt War
  
  Sonoratown
  
  Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo
  
  Pre-Chicano Movement
  
  1917 Bath riots
  
  Bisbee Deportation
  
  Bloody Christmas
  
  Bracero program
  
  California agricultural strikes
  
  Cantaloupe strike of 1928
  
  Citrus Strike of 1936
  
  La Matanza
  
  Mexican Repatriation
  
  Operation Wetback
  
  Plan de San Diego
  
  Porvenir Massacre
  
  Sleepy Lagoon trial
  
  Zoot Suit Riots
  
  Chicano Movement
  
  Aztlán
  
  Black-brown unity
  
  Brown Berets
  
  Católicos por La Raza
  
  Centro Cultural
  
  Chicanismo
  
  Chicano Moratorium
  
  Colegio César Chávez
  
  CFMN
  
  Conferencia de Mujeres
  
  CRP
  
  East L.A. walkouts
  
  Hijas de Cuauhtémoc
  
  Huelga schools
  
  Land grant struggle
  
  Las Adelitas de Aztlán
  
  Los Siete de la Raza
  
  Los Seis de Boulder
  
  MANA
  
  MAYO
  
  MEChA
  
  Occupation of Catalina Island
  
  PCUN
  
  Plan Espiritual de Aztlán
  
  Plan de Santa Bárbara
  
  Quinto Sol
  
  Raza Unida Party
  
  United Farm Workers
  
  Post-Chicano Period
  
  1985–1987 cannery strike
  
  1992 Drywall Strike
  
  2019 El Paso shooting
  
  Abolish ICE
  
  Arizona SB 1070
  
  Castro 2020
  
  Chicano Art Exhibit
  
  DACA
  
  Great American Boycott
  
  IRCA
  
  Farah strike
  
  Justice for Janitors
  
  Murder of Selena
  
  Proposition 187
  
  South Central Farm :
  
  Culture
  
  Language
  
  Abrazos, no balazos
  
  Caló
  
  Chicano English
  
  Chicano names
  
  Órale
  
  Food
  
  New Mexican cuisine
  
  Tex-Mex cuisine
  
  Mexican-American cuisine
  
  Music
  
  Chicano rap
  
  Chicano rock
  
  Chicano soul
  
  Tejano music
  
  Symbols
  
  Cal-Style VW
  
  Homies
  
  Lowrider
  
  Lowrider bicycle
  
  Mexican-American folklore
  
  Pancho Claus
  
  Zoot suit :
  
  Literature
  
  Literature
  
  Chicana literature
  
  Chicano literature
  
  Chicano poetry
  
  Autobiographical
  
  Always Running
  
  Living Up the Street
  
  Who Would Have Thought It?
  
  Novels
  
  Bless Me, Ultima
  
  Caballero
  
  Desert Blood
  
  From This Wicked Patch of Dust
  
  Mexican WhiteBoy
  
  The Dirty Girls Social Club
  
  The House on Mango Street
  
  The Rain God
  
  The Revolt of the Cockroach People
  
  So Far from God
  
  Under the Feet of Jesus
  
  ...y no se lo tragó la tierra
  
  Poetry and Short Stories
  
  Emplumada
  
  I Am Joaquin
  
  Moment of Silence
  
  Pensamiento Serpentino
  
  The Moths :
  
  Chicana/o studies
  
  Fields
  
  Chicana feminism
  
  Chicanafuturism
  
  Organizations
  
  MAS Programs, Tucson
  
  NACCS
  
  UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center
  
  Texts
  
  Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza
  
  Brown, Not White
  
  The Church in the Barrio
  
  This Bridge Called My Back
  
  Theory
  
  Barrioization
  
  Coyolxauhqui imperative
  
  Gringo justice
  
  Nahui Ollin
  
  Nepantla
  
  New tribalism
  
  Rasquachismo
  
  Spiritual activism
  
  Vergüenza
  
  Youth control complex :
  
  Visual art
  
  Visual Art
  
  Chicana art
  
  Chicano art
  
  Chicano cinema
  
  Paño
  
  Tortilla art
  
  Art Collectives
  
  Asco
  
  Culture Clash
  
  East Los Streetscapers
  
  Los Four
  
  Mujeres Muralistas
  
  Teatro Campesino
  
  Royal Chicano Air Force
  
  Art organizations
  
  Centro de Arte Público
  
  Galería de la Raza
  
  Mission Cultural Center for Latino Arts
  
  Precita Eyes
  
  Self Help Graphics & Art
  
  Locations
  
  Balmy Alley
  
  Chicano Park
  
  Estrada Courts
  
  Great Wall of Los Angeles :
  
  Law
  
  Supreme Court cases
  
  Botiller v. Dominguez
  
  Hernandez v. Texas
  
  San Antonio I.S.D. v. Rodriguez
  
  Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co.
  
  U.S. v. Brignoni-Ponce
  
  Plyler v. Doe
  
  Medellín v. Texas
  
  Flores-Figueroa v. U.S.
  
  Leal Garcia v. Texas
  
  Mendez v. Westminster
  
  Bernal v. Fainter
  
  Perez v. Brownell
  
  DHS v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal.
  
  Federal Court cases
  
  Madrigal v. Quilligan :
  
  Population
  
  Population by City
  
  Arizona (Tucson)
  
  California (Los Angeles)
  
  Illinois (Chicago)
  
  Michigan (Detroit)
  
  Nebraska (Omaha)
  
  Texas
  
  Dallas–Fort Worth
  
  Houston
  
  Multiethnic
  
  Blaxicans
  
  Californios
  
  Nuevomexicanos
  
  Tejanos
  
  Indigenous Mexican Americans
  
  Punjabi Mexican Americans :
  
  Lists
  
  Chicano films
  
  Chicano poets
  
  Chicano rappers
  
  Mexican Americans
  
  Writers
  
  Bibliography :
  
  United States portal
  
  Category
  
  Index :
  
  vte :
  
  Gringo justice is a sociohistorical critical theory developed by Chicano sociologist, lawyer, and activist Alfredo Mirandé in 1987, who used it to provide an alternative explanation for Chicano criminality in the United States and challenge the racist assumption that Chicanos were inherently criminal, or biologically, psychologically, or culturally predisposed to engage in criminal behavior. The theory is applied by Chicano and Latino scholars to explain the double standard of justice in the criminal justice system between Anglo-Americans and Chicanos/Latinos. The theory also challenges stereotypes of Chicanos/Latinos as "bandidos," "gang-bangers," and "illegal alien drug smugglers," which have historically developed and are maintained to justify social control over Chicano/Latino people in the US.
  
  Scholars cite how Latinos are far more likely than Anglo-Americans to be incarcerated, rather than granted probation, when convicted of a felony offense (even when appropriate legal variables are considered), that Latinos are handed down significantly longer prison sentences (particularly in regard to felony drug offenses), and that Latinos are racially profiled at disproportionate rates, as evidence of contemporary gringo justice. Latinos are also overrepresented in the prison population and as victims of police shootings with deadly force. However, scholars note that the topic remains relatively unexplored and neglected, partially attributing this to a lack of interest but also to difficulties in conducting research on Latinos in the criminal justice system because of the way they are racially classified in the US.
  
  Gringo justice is applied against Chicanos and Latinos by the Anglo-American criminal justice system in order to maintain their social, economic, and political domination in modern capitalist society, so that they can remain, as Mirandé states, "a vital source of cheap and dependent labor for the developing capitalistic system." Scholars also note that maintaining gringo justice works to reduce "any threat to conceptions of ethnic superiority that may be held by some whites."
  
  ## Term
  
  Alfredo Mirandé states that he used the term gringo justice because it would have been illogical in his view to characterize the American criminal justice system as anything other than an unjust system for Chicanos, or a system that only worked for white people. As Mirandé describes:
  
     Titles such as Law, Justice, and the Chicano and Chicanos and the Legal and Judicial System were considered and discarded because they implied that the American legal and judicial system had been just and equitable in its treatment of Chicanos. The title Gringo Justice seemed to more accurately capture the reality of the Chicano experience before the American tribunals.
  
  ## Theory
  
  In his book Gringo Justice (1987), Mirandé outlines the theoretical underpinnings of gringo justice. He then lists the basic or essential components of gringo justice. These basic principles of the theory are explained by Mirandé as follows:
  
  * The criminalization of the Chicano resulted not from their being more criminal or violent, but from a clash between conflicting and competing cultures, world views, and economic, political and judicial systems.
  * In the aftermath of the North American invasion and the acquisition of Mexico's northern territories, Chicanos were rendered landless and displaced politically and economically, but they became a vital source of cheap and dependent labor for the developing capitalistic system.
  * Chicanos were labeled as bandidos because they actively resisted Anglo encroachment and domination but lacked the power to shape images of criminality or to articulate sociological/criminological theories. The bandido image served to reinforce or legitimate their economic, political, and legal exploitation.
  * As Chicanos were displaced economically and politically, they became increasingly concentrated in ethnically and residentially homogenous neighborhoods or barrios. Barriorization made it possible to maintain a constant supply of cheap labor without contaminating Anglo society, while keeping Chicanos in a subordinate and dependent position.
  * Conflict with law enforcement intensified during the twentieth century. With growing barriorization the police assumed an increasingly important role in maintaining Chicanos under control and enforcing the social and physical isolation of the barrio.
  * Although Chicanos are essentially a landless people not integrated into the American melting pot, barrios are a symbolic land base and an important source of identity and pride.
  * So-called gangs or barrio youth groups may have negative manifestations, but they are not inherently deviant or criminal, and they provide an essential sense of identity, self-worth, and pride for their members that is afforded other youth by more socially acceptable groupings.
  
  Mirandé also connects gringo justice to the inequitable treatment of Black Americans within the criminal justice system in his book Gringo Injustice (2019), stating that "it is neither possible nor desirable to be indifferent or neutral toward racism or the prevailing unequal system of justice in the United States."
  
  ## Application
  
  ### Injustice and inequality
  
  Gringo justice is used to describe instances in which Chicanos and Latinos experience unjust and unequal treatment within any facet of the United States criminal justice system, both in historical and contemporary contexts. It has been applied by scholars to describe or explain the following instances:
  
  * A 2019 report from the Office of Inspector General for traffic stops, which revealed that "Latinos were both stopped and searched at much greater rates than any other racial or ethnic groups," despite the fact that "there was a very low rate of success in finding contraband."
  * A report by the US Bureau of Justice Statistics which revealed that Latinos were overrepresented in traffic stops and arrest rates. Latinos comprise approximately 17.8% of the US population, yet make up 23% of all searches and 30% of all arrests. Some scholars argue that Latino overrepresentation is even more evident when multivariate approaches to data analysis are adopted.
  * A California Department of Justice report which estimated that over a ten-year period that about 43% of the victims of police shootings were Latino.
  * A study from 1987 to 1991 which found that Latinos are at a "significantly higher likelihood for incarceration, rather than probation, for the conviction of a felony offense even when controlling for relevant legal variables" and that they receive longer prison sentences, "particularly when convicted of felony drug offenses."
  * A review by the Department of Justice revealed that Latinos sentenced to prison doubled from 7.7% to 14.3% from 1980 to 1993.
  
  ### Stereotypes
  
  A central aspect of the theory of gringo justice is challenging stereotypes of Chicanos and Latinos as inherently criminal, which have been and continue to be perpetuated in Anglo-American society. Scholars acknowledge that an understanding of gringo justice provides an alternative explanation to the criminal stereotypes of Chicanos and Latinos. Some of the stereotypes have been acknowledged as follows:
  
  * Early research conducted on Mexicans generally portrayed them as "innately criminal and prone to thievery and lawlessness," an image which is often associated with non-white racial groups. It has been noted that "the mere presence of Latino immigrants instills fear among longtime residents," even those who claim to be aware of stereotypical portrayals.
  * A Texas judge while in court reportedly told a 'joke' which revealed how they perceived Mexicans. The 'joke' stated: "How do you make a Mexican omelet? Well, first you steal three eggs."
  * Scholar Steven W. Bender notes that the stereotype of Latino thievery is "by force rather than by stealth" since Latinos are seen as "predisposed toward violent, vicious behavior, so that their crimes may be cold-blooded." Latino youth are also "assumed to be gang members who will eventually graduate from wielding spray-paint canisters to carrying knives and guns."
  * Along with Latino youth, even older Latinos are also stereotyped as "suppliers and users of illicit drugs."
  
  ## History
  
  The historical roots of gringo justice are based in the movement of white Americans from the east coast into the northern territories of Mexico (Alta California, Santa Fe de Nuevo México, and Coahuila y Tejas), who brought with them racist ideas of Anglo superiority and domination. As described by historian Ed A. Muñoz, "not surprising, these Anglo American immigrants in the northern borderlands came to view Mexicans as a subhuman and inferior mongrel race due to their centuries-old African, Indian, and European mestizaje, or racial/ethnic mixing." Mexican land soon became the object of desire for Anglo American settlers under ideas of manifest destiny and the desire to expand slave states westward (slavery was abolished in Mexico in 1829; it was not abolished in the United States until 1865). For Anglo settlers, "Mexican lands were a fountain of resources for a burgeoning U.S. society bent on spreading modern capitalist society around the globe."
  
  In 1836, Anglo immigrants in Texas declared independence from Mexico and Mexican officials refused to recognize this claim as it was an infringement on their sovereignty. This resulted in an open conflict between Anglos and Mexicans, which has roots in the development of the stereotype of the Mexican bandit. As described by Muñoz, "oddly enough it was Mexican resistance to American aggression and illegal colonizing that led to the evolution of the Mexican 'bandido' stereotype. This negative icon portrayed Mexicans as bloodthirsty savages filled with wanton lust for American land and women and worked to justify sustained skirmishes in disputed lands." Texas was annexed in 1845. As a violation of international law, this effectively resulted in the Mexican-American War (1846-1848). Following the war, Mexicans still within the borders of what was now the United States, were transformed from Mexican citizens "into a dependent labor force for southwestern commercial agriculture and industrialization."
  
  Mexicans were stripped of social, economic, and political rights which had been outlined in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (1848) and were increasingly portrayed as criminal and subjected to violent policing by groups such as the Texas Rangers. The U.S. government completely erased Article X of the treaty which guaranteed "the validity of land grants distributed by Mexican authorities before the war," which made many Mexicans landless. Anglo vigilante groups, both formal and informal, also attacked Mexicans, who became second-class citizens. Mexicans who resisted this violence like Gregorio Cortez, las Gorras Blancas, and Juan Cortina were labelled as outlaws by Anglos, but became champions among some Mexican American people along the border "because they openly resisted the legal and extralegal takeover of Mexican lands, suppression of Mexican civil rights, and the violation of Mexican families."
  
  This resistance, along with further displacement of Mexican revolutionaries from Mexico into the southwestern United States and conflicts with Pancho Villa's revolutionary army, contributed to the rise of "a notion of unpatriotic disloyalty among the U.S. Mexican-origin immigrant and nonimmigrant population." However, the need for Mexican labor soared in the American capitalist system, which led to increasing barrioization or hyper-segregation of Mexicans into areas with poor infrastructure and opportunities by the early 20th century. In these spaces, Mexicans were criminalized at a level unprecedented in Anglo-American communities. Scholars have compared this to Jim Crow laws applied to Black people in the South. During the Great Depression, Mexican labor was suddenly treated as disposable because of the collapse of the American economy, which resulted in the Mexican Repatriation (1929-1936) in which 400,000 to 2 million Mexicans were deported from the United States against their will (it is estimated that about 60% of them were birthright citizens of the United States).
  
  By the 1940s, the pachuco subculture had emerged in open defiance and resistance to this system of gringo justice, embracing a style of dress and social behavior that was widely condemned by Anglo-American society and also by more assimilationist-focused Mexican Americans. Anglo-American hatred for pachuco defiance culminated in the open attacks on Mexican American zoot-suiters by white servicemen in the Zoot Suit Riots. While Mexicans were largely the victims of the attacks, they were arrested by the police while servicemen went free. Some police officers reportedly joined in on the rioting and attacks. The local press praised the attackers and described the riots as a "cleansing effect" to free Los Angeles of Mexican "miscreants" and "hoodlums." Over 500 Latinos were arrested and charged with "rioting" and "vagrancy." The zoot suit garment itself was also criminalized in the city, as the city council stated it represented "hoodlumism."
  
  