title: Political party funding
text: # Political party funding
  
  Part of the Politics series :
  
  Party politics :
  
  Political spectrum
  
  Left-wing
  
  Far-leftCentre-left
  
  Centre
  
  Centre-leftRadical centreCentre-right
  
  Right-wing
  
  Centre-rightFar-right :
  
  Platforms/Ideologies
  
  Anarchist
  
  Christian democratic
  
  Communist
  
  Conservative
  
  Democratic
  
  Environmentalist
  
  Fascist
  
  Fundamentalist
  
  Globalist
  
  Green
  
  Internationalist
  
  Liberal
  
  Libertarian
  
  Nationalist
  
  Pirate Party
  
  Populist
  
  Progressive
  
  Radical
  
  Regionalist
  
  Republican
  
  Social democratic
  
  Socialist
  
  Syncretic :
  
  Types
  
  Elite party
  
  Cartel party
  
  Catch-all party
  
  Entrepreneurial party
  
  Mass party
  
  Ruling party
  
  Opposition party
  
  Parliamentary opposition
  
  Official party status
  
  Single-issue party :
  
  Leaders and organization
  
  Backbencher
  
  Caucus
  
  Caucus chair
  
  Floor leader
  
  Frontbencher
  
  Lead candidate
  
  Leader of the Opposition
  
  Majority leader
  
  Minority leader
  
  Political faction
  
  Parliamentary leader
  
  Party chair
  
  Party leader
  
  Party spokesperson
  
  Secretary
  
  Shadow cabinet
  
  Whip :
  
  Internal elections
  
  Primary election
  
  Leadership election
  
  Open list
  
  Party convention/conference
  
  Leadership convention :
  
  Party discipline
  
  Conscience vote
  
  Crossing the floor
  
  Party discipline
  
  Party line
  
  Party-line vote
  
  Party switching :
  
  Party systems
  
  One-party
  
  Dominant-partyTwo-partyMulti-party
  
  Non-partisan :
  
  Coalitions between parties
  
  Parliamentary group
  
  Divided government
  
  Coalition government
  
  Confidence and supply
  
  Consensus government
  
  Grand coalition
  
  Hung parliament
  
  Majority government
  
  Minority government
  
  National unity government
  
  Rotation government :
  
  Lists of political parties
  
  Ruling parties by country
  
  Political parties by region
  
  Political ideologies
  
  Banned political parties :
  
  Politics portal :
  
  vte :
  
  Political party funding is a method used by a political party to raise money for campaigns and routine activities. The funding of political parties is an aspect of campaign finance.
  
  Political parties are funded by contributions from multiple sources. One of the largest sources of funding comes from party members and individual supporters through membership fees, subscriptions and small donations. This type of funding is often referred to as grassroots funding or support. Solicitation of larger donations from wealthy individuals, often referred to as plutocratic funding, is also a common method of securing funds. Parties can also be funded by organizations that share their political views, such as unions, political action committees, or organizations that seek to benefit from the party's policies. In certain locales, taxpayer money may be given to a party by the federal government. This is accomplished through state aid grants, government, or public funding. Additionally, political fundraising can occur via illegal means, such as influence peddling, graft, extortion, kickbacks and embezzlement.
  
  ## Donations and membership fees
  
  Political parties may be given money by organizations, businesses, individual donors and special interest groups, such as trade unions. These groups may offer money or gifts to either the party or its leading members as incentives. When this happens with the goal of influencing the political stance or actions of the party, this is referred to as lobbying.
  
  Since the second half of the 20th century, parties that typically relied upon donations or membership fees have been facing mounting problems. Increased scrutiny of donations and the long-term decline in party memberships in most western democracies are placing a greater strain on funding. For example, in the United Kingdom and Australia, membership of the two main parties in 2006 was less than an eighth of what it was in 1950, despite significant increases in population over the same period.
  
  Straddling personal and public political funding, a U.S. public funding program allows taxpayers to direct $3 of their federal income tax to finance the qualified expenses of eligible presidential candidates. Rather than a contribution, the small individual donation constitutes a redirection of income tax owed without additional direct disbursement by taxpayers.
  
  In some parties, such as the post-communist parties of France and Italy, or the Socialist parties in Ireland and the Netherlands, elected representatives take only the average industrial worker's wage from their salary as a representative, while the rest contributes to funding their party in general. Although these examples may now be rare, "rent-seeking" from incumbents continues to be a feature of some parties, such as in Nepal.
  
  In the United Kingdom, it has been alleged that peerages have been awarded to party fund contributors, with benefactors becoming members of the House of Lords and thus in a position to participate in the legislative process. For instance, UK Prime minister David Lloyd George was found to have been selling peerages. To prevent similar future corruption, Parliament enacted the Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act 1925, making the outright sale of peerages and similar benefits a criminal act. However, some benefactors are alleged to have attempted to circumvent this by disguising their contributions as loans, giving rise to the "Cash for Peerages" scandal.
  
  Such activities, as well as assumed influence peddling, have given rise to demands for donation caps. As the costs of elections increase, so do the demands of party funds. In the UK, some politicians have advocated that parties be funded by the state, a proposal that promised to give rise to debate in the country that was first to regulate campaign expenses in 1883. However, no legislative action has followed the proposal.
  
  ## Public subsidies
  
  In many democracies, subsidies for party activity were introduced decades ago. Public financing for parties and candidates has several permutations and is increasingly common. Germany, Sweden, Israel, Canada, Australia, Austria, and Spain are cases in point. More recently, France, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Poland, and others have followed suit.
  
  There are two broad categories of public funding:
  
  * Direct - entailing a monetary transfer to a party.
  * Indirect - including broadcasting time on state media, use of the mail service, or supplies.
  
  According to the comparative data from the ACE Electoral Knowledge Network, from a sample of over 180 nations, 25% of nations provide no direct or indirect public funding, 58% provide direct public funding, and 60% provide indirect public funding. Some countries provide both direct and indirect public funding to political parties.
  
  Funding may be equal for all parties or dependent upon the results of previous elections or the number of candidates participating in an election. Frequently, parties rely on a mix of private and public funding and are required to disclose their finances to an election management body.
  
  ## Foreign aid
  
  In fledgling democracies, funding can also be provided through foreign aid. International donors provide financial help to political parties in developing countries as a means to promote democracy and good governance, or, in some cases, to support preferred political parties. Support can be purely financial or otherwise. Frequently, support is provided in the form of capacity development activities, including the development of party manifestos, party constitutions, and campaigning skills.
  
  The goal of all aid types is to provide development assistance at the international level to maintain a functioning global society. Major principles of modern forms of foreign aid were determined within the Marshall Plan, which aimed to support the reconstruction of Europe after World War II and the US Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. Developing ties between ideologically affiliated parties is another common feature of international support for a party. This can sometimes be perceived as direct support for the political aims of a political party, such as the support of the US government to the Georgian party behind the Rose Revolution.
  
  Other donors work on a more neutral basis, where multiple donors provide grants in countries accessible by all parties for various purposes defined by the recipients. Some leading think-tanks like the Overseas Development Institute have called to increase support for political parties as part of developing the capacity to deal with the demands of interest-driven donors to improve governance.
  
  ## Foreign interference
  
  Concerns have been raised over less overt interventions in national political party funding made by foreign governments as it impugns the reputation of nation-states on the world stage; the topic remains controversial and fiercely debated and defended.
  
  In August 2021, a lawsuit charged the former fundraiser of the United States Republican Party, Elliot Broidy, accountable for accepting funds worth millions of dollars from the government of the United Arab Emirates. The funding was allegedly aimed at executing a smear campaign against the State of Qatar, a then-rival of the UAE, and influencing the US foreign policy.
  
  