title: Tsumego
text: # Tsumego
  
  Part of a series on :
  
  Puzzles :
  
  Types
  
  Guessing
  
  Riddle
  
  Situation
  
  Logic
  
  Dissection
  
  Induction
  
  Logic grid
  
  Self-reference
  
  Mechanical
  
  Combination
  
  Construction
  
  Disentanglement
  
  Lock
  
  Go problems
  
  Folding
  
  Stick
  
  Tiling
  
  Tour
  
  Sliding
  
  Chess
  
  Maze (Logic maze)
  
  Word and Number
  
  Crossword
  
  Sudoku
  
  Puzzle video games
  
  Mazes
  
  Metapuzzles :
  
  Topics
  
  Brain teaser
  
  Dilemma
  
  Optical illusion
  
  Packing problems
  
  Paradox
  
  Problem solving
  
  Puzzlehunt
  
  Syllogism :
  
  Lists
  
  Impossible puzzles
  
  Maze video games
  
  Nikoli puzzle types
  
  Puzzle video games
  
  Puzzle topics :
  
  vte :
  
  Tsumego (詰碁) is the Japanese term for a type of go problem based on life-and-death. The term likely comes from tsumeshogi (詰将棋, tsumeshōgi), as tsumeru (詰める) means checkmating in shogi but has different meanings in go. Tsumego problems are common in newspaper columns.
  
  Tsumego problems have been found in Chinese books dating back to around the 13th century. They were presumably composed and collected from actual games much earlier. They range from situations that occur quite commonly, which every strong player ought to be familiar with, to deliberately difficult puzzles. Some books of the latter type are still used for professional training.
  
  Several conventions are used in the problems. The objective is to kill a group or prevent it from being killed. Problems do not specify how many plays are in the solution (as would be usual in a chess problem), because the goal of the problem is rarely to capture stones; as soon as the correct first move is played, the threatened group can be considered alive (or dead). Solution diagrams will either show the most tenacious resistance that the opponent can offer, or lines that require interesting or tricky tactics. If only part of the board is shown, as is usually the case, the rest of the board can be assumed to be empty. The modern convention is that well composed problems do not allow the threatened group to escape into empty areas of the board (this is one way in which such problems differ from real games), although escape and recapture was a theme in classical problems.
  
  