[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[Zelda] Why doesn't Maz Koshia defeat Ganon himself?

He's ridiculously powerful, and has seemingly limitless abilities. Why doesn't he go down to Hyrule Castle and wreck Ganon?

And while Maz is not "worthy" of wielding the Master Sword, you don't actually need the Master Sword to defeat Ganon. In theory you can do it with a stick.

Every day that Maz waits for the "champion" rather than doing it himself, innocent men, women, and children in Hyrule are killed by monsters and Guardians.

[Assistant] Magic. They gave up a lot to store all those trials to train Link, and as you saw, after their prepared stuff is done, they kinda fade away into nothingness. It's hard to tell if they can affect the outside world at all. Leave the shrine/place they're at. Or really are aware of anything until Link comes along. Who knows how much of what you do in those shrines is real or just part of the magic.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] Why do men tend to go bald in the typical horseshoe shaped pattern?

[Assistant]
Hello and welcome to AskScience. Please don't guess the answer, please don't share your personal anecdotes, and please stay on topic.

Please make use of peer reviewed sources and explain the content of those sources in your own words. These posts are far preferable than linking to something on the internet without explaning why it is relevant to the question.

Thanks for your help!


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[Star Wars/KOTOR] Suppose Im a lowly Imperial Soldier, that is being bullied by a Sith Lord. But I have a secret, Im Force Sensitive, and I blast him away with a fear/anger induced Force Push. What happens now?

Do I die? Do some men in black robes spirit me away?

[Assistant]
Depends on the Sith Lord.

A petty one would kill you on the spot.

However, a more merciful and powerful Dark Lord (Vader*, Revan, Malak) would probably consider using you, depending on your power, which given that you used a Force push on a trained Force adept, means you have enough to be competent.

In some Sith eras, you would likely be retrained as a Sith acolyte, part of the Sith hierarchy but not a true Sith Lord, much like the Sith assassins and fallen Jedi under Revan's army were not true Sith Lords.

In others, where there were numerous Sith Lords, you might well end up being a Sith yourself, choking lowly Imperial soldiers.

*Vader is quick to anger, but he does not discard something he finds useful, like a potential apprentice capable of fighting back against a Sith Lord. For example: Galen Marek.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] [The X-Files] Despite seeing all she's seen, why does Scully continually not believe Mulder about alien life, the paranormal, etc?

[Assistant]
After a while, she is convinced but she's choosing to play Devil's Advocate (deliberately being argumentative in order to force Fox to make a more concrete argument for his own beliefs). In doing so, she'll force him to logically think through his argument and hopefully make a breakthrough himself.

Think about it like this. A man in a rural farming community is killed and based on the stab wounds, it's known that he was stabbed in the torso with a pitchfork. Everyone in town owns a pitchfork but Alice, who lives in the town, believes that out of all the farmers, Bob is the only one to have killed the victim.

Charlie, her friend, also believes that Bob did it but he thinks that Alice is jumping to conclusions so he deliberately pokes holes in her theory as all the farmers don't have alibis and equally disliked the victim. He then asks her what makes Bob the most suspicious and what's different about him compared to the other farmers.

That is when Alice realises that yes, Bob *did* kill the man - everyone in town exclusively uses pitchforks to either move hay or to dig up vegetables, but there were flies buzzing around Bob's pitchfork... because they're attracted to the victim's blood which wasn't properly washed off by the killer.

By deliberately poking holes in Mulder's argument, Scully is making him make a better argument with proof and logic.

Keep in mind, in later seasons >!when Mulder is on the run!<, Scully ends up taking his role as the conspiracy theorist while her new partner is the skeptic.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
ELI5: How can wrist-scan age tests determine your age?

I've read that FIFA is able to judge person's age with more than 99% certainty from wrist-scan test. What's the process behind that, how do they determine the exact age?

[Assistant]
Since the auto moderator won't allow an efficient answer here's a slightly longer one.

They can't. Wrist scans are discredited everywhere. You can't tell the difference between a 17 year old and an 18 year old via a wrist scan. You can't even tell a 15 year old or a 19 year old.

You can determine whether the bones have finished growing, but, perhaps unsurprisingly, being 18 or not is only loosely correlated with that actually happening.

We all knew people who were done growing at 14 and people who were still doing it at 19 so this shouldn't be a huge suprise.

There are doctors who will insist they can do this for money, but they are lying, as at FIFA.

FIFA doesn't care though. They care about the appearance of a fair competition so false positives are fine by them.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: Allergies are caused by an immune system overreaction. Why cant immunosuppressant drugs like Humira be used to prevent allergic reactions?

[Assistant]
There are a few reasons. First, Humira targets a different part of the immune system than is triggered by allergies. Histamine is one of the most common immune signals for allergic responses, so most allergy meds block histamine signaling in some aspect. Humira blocks "Tumor Necrosis Factor" (TNF) signaling which is involved in viral infections, inducing fevers, cancer, and auto immune based inflammation.

Second, Humira has a much greater risk of severe side effects compared to over the counter allergy meds. This is because TNF signaling being used for a wider range of the immune system.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
ELI5: How does sexual arousal occur?

How does sexual arousal actually occur? What causes it? Why do human beings want to have sex?

[Assistant]
Human beings want to have sex because we're animals and animals exist to reproduce, it's hard-wired into our evolution because any animals that mutate the desire not to reproduce will... Well... Not reproduce, so they will die without passing on that trait.

Sexual arousal likely exists because keeping an animal in a constant state of being prepared for sex would be a waste of resources. It's more efficient to have those aspects of our biology only trigger when we think we're about to enter into a situation where reproduction might be possible, when we haven't reproduced for some time or when we encounter a partner with desirable genetic traits. (ie, when we witness erotic imagery or situations, when we haven't had sex or masturbated for a day or more or when we see a person we think is attractive).

The result of the first of those situations (recognising that reproduction might be on the table) is that it ends up being the brain's job to decide when that might be. That means there's a mental component to sexual arousal, it becomes a vague (and scientifically difficult to study) field wherein societal and personal factors begin to influence our sub-conscious recognition of what is or is not sexually arousing.

Our ancestors frequently carved imagery of breasts and swollen pregnant bellies, images of fertility, which have a sensible enough correlation to reproduction; but today we have many other (often less relevant) mental associations (think of people becoming aroused at the sight of underwear or bikinis, even with no one inside them), so the brain's involvement with sexuality is definitely apparent, but difficult to understand.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
ELI5: That high pitched sound a tube television makes in which you can tell it's on even when there's nothing playing.

You all know that sound. You walk into a room where someone forgot to turn off the tv and you can tell right away it's on just by that really faint high pitched sound.

[Assistant]
The tube television works by directing an electron beam to draw, pixels by pixels, scanning from left to right, row by row. Of course, after every row, the beam has to go all the way to the left again to start the next row. This means that the beam is constantly oscillating very quickly^1. The beam is directed by metal plates that quickly reverse charge. Electric current causes magnetic fields^2, and magnetic fields causes magnetic things to move around or even change shape! The high frequency vibration that results from this causes the air to vibrate too, producing the sound.

Note^1 : Horizontal scanning is done at around 15734 Hz or 15625 Hz, which is near the upper extreme range of human hearing. Old people might not be able to hear this. Not to be confused with refresh rate, or vertical scanning, which happens at 60 Hz.

Note^2 : In particular, the thing called the flyback transformer, which converts our normal electricity to the high frequency sawtooth signal, is responsible for the noise since its magnetic coils concentrate the magnetic fields.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: What is that tingling/itchy/hot/pain that dots across our body when we enter a warm building after being in the cold while wearing really warm clothes?

[Assistant] When you're cold, blood moves to more needed areas, like your chest, head, and anything else more vital than simple areas like your hands and feet. When you move from cold to hot, the blood rushes back to these smaller areas. Think of it like a traffic jam. Blood is rapidly rushing back to your hands when you put them under warm water after being cold, and there is a lot of pressure, causing that "tingling/itchy/hot/pain."


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] Can particle spin exist in a 2D universe?

[Assistant] By 2D if you mean 2 spatial dimensions and 1 time dimension, the answer is absolutely. Fermions (spin-1/2 particles) and bosons (spin 0, 1, etc particles) can both exist in 2+1D systems. Effectively 2+1D systems are seen frequently in a lot of condensed matter contexts. Even weirder, though, is that in many 2+1D systems, you can have particles which are not fermions or bosons -- they are anyions, effectively with any non-integer spin. The spin of a particle defines the particle's spin statistics, meaning how the state of a system changes upon swapping identical particles in the system. Upon swapping bosons, nothing happens to a description, but swapping two fermions gives a minus sign (e^i(pi) where i is the imaginary number). Depending on the exact spin of the anyon, swapping anyons will give a a factor of some e^ix where x is between 0 and 2pi.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
ELI5: If you put a perfectly spherical object onto a perfectly flat surface would only one atom from the sphere be touching the surface?

I guess this is just theoretical but I was wondering if there's a definitive answer.

[Assistant]
This is a question which illustrates how incompatible reality can be with mathematical rigour.

In mathematics, a perfect sphere sitting on top of a perfectly flat plane would indeed have a single point of intersection. Such a flat plane would be a 'tangent plane' to the sphere.

However, in reality, nothing can be 'perfectly spherical' or 'perfectly flat', as both of these properties are defined rigorously by mathematics alone.

A sphere for instance is a mathematical object with very specific rules, e.g.

* Every point on the surface of the sphere is equidistant from it's centre.
* Every point on the surface of the sphere has the same curvature.

And conclusions you can draw from the properties such as:

* The maximum distance between two points on a sphere is achieved when they can be connected by a straight line through the centre of the sphere.
* The sphere looks exactly the same from any direction.

These very specific mathematical conditions are too specific to be consistent with the real world.

But back to the question, if you lived in some imaginary world where objects in that world complied exactly with specific mathematical definitions for flat planes and spheres, then a sphere and plane could intersect at a single point (this would not be an atom as we know it though). In the real world where atoms are a thing and mathematical definitions don't exactly translate, then no.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[Iron Man]If Tony Stark wanted to do good in the world, why didn't he just mass-produce arc reactors?

As far as I can tell, the Arc reactor is the closest thing to a magical power source that exists in any sci-fi universe. It it has a ridiculously high energy density, is lightweight, compact, and produces electricity with no pollutants or bi-products including waste heat. A brief list of things that could be accomplished:

* Mass water desalination pipelines to provide limitless drinking and agriculture water to anywhere on the planet. No more regional food shortages, a dramatic reduction in disease, and general elimination of many geopolitical problems. The most barren of deserts could be turned into economically viable farmland.

* Complete replacement of all forms of transportation and baseline energy, eliminating the need for fossil fuels. Surplus energy can even be used for carbon sinks to artifically scrub CO2 from the atmosphere and return to normal levels.

Seems like if he focused on providing essentially free energy to the planet, a lot of motivation people have for starting wars and committing terrorism would vanish. Surely that would be a much more efficient means than fighting crime in a robot suit.

[Assistant]
Just because he hasn't yet doesn't mean he isn't going to. The Stark tower of NYC is well known as being the first prototype of a large scale self-sustaining ARC reactor used in a civilian setting.

The media has speculated that the tower test would have been successful given the one-year testing period, had an alien invasion fleet not invaded.

Give it some time - It was only recently that the ARC reactor was seen as something more than a pet project by its own researchers. Rest assured, Tony Stark isn't finished yet.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5 why does your skin get red when stretched or hurt?

[Assistant] In addition to the other comment (ie your blood vessels get damaged and bleed), when your skin gets irritated or damaged it releases certain chemicals that cause blood to rush to the area. This blood brings all the cells needed to help repair it and protect it from infection.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: What is happening in your brain when a song "gets stuck" in your head?

[Assistant]
IIRC this is due to the Zeignark effect. It basically means our mind seems to think of unfinished things very often in an attempt to complete it and in this case the unfinished thing  is the song.

Try completing the song the next time its stuck in your head.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: Why don't new helicopters reflect the quadcopter designs commonly used by drones? Seems like it'd be safer and easier to control.

[Assistant]
4 sets rotors with 4 motors as opposed to a single set of rotors with a single drive system is 4x the amount of equipment that can potentially break.

Also a drone is generally small and light enough that it can use much less serious (and cheaper) components. A drone has small electric motors driving small plastic rotors, because that's good enough to lift a couple pounds of weight. A real helicopter has a giant internal combustion engine moving big heavy rotors.

Lots of things just don't "scale up" well at all.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: Why during a car crash or any accident do we get hurt more from having our muscles tense? Don't we tense up to protect ourselves?

[Assistant]
You tense up ready to react if you have to. It's not an advantage in an impact but for most of our evolution, we weren't in much danger of high speed impact unless you fell out of a tree or off a cliff.

There were far more situations where being poised to suddenly spring into action was more likely to save your life.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: Is 'opossum' different than 'possum'

[Assistant] Strictly speaking, they're two different families - opossums are found in the Western Hemisphere, possums are found in Australia and surrounding areas. But, you'll hear opossums called possums pretty regularly from average people.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
ELI5: Why does my music sound slower when I exercise?

This is tough to describe. When I'm listening to music on my phone, it has a usual rhythm. But when I listen while I exercise, the music sounds just a touch slower.

But, when I think about how slow it is, the feeling goes away, and the music sounds regular again.

I imagine this has to do with focus, but I'm sure someone can explain it in depth.

[Assistant] Your body's internal clock is set based on your heart rate, which usually is the exact beat of the BeeGees' "Staying Alive". When you exercise, your heart rate increases to the beat of other, better songs.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
ELI5:Why are there so many "bad" movies? Don't the people making them see the problems the audience does?

I'm not talking about Transformers which consciously makes sacrifices in "quality" for boobs and explosions and box-office blockbusting.

I'm talking about places where a script makes *bad* choices for seemingly no reason. Take, for example, the movie *Noah*. It is not exactly a bad movie by most measures. It had beautiful shots and amazing CGI, the cast was great and concept had potential... But the movie was mediocre. People seemed to dislike the fact that it mostly became an Action Hero movie about Noah fighting bad guys instead of living up to what was promised in the trailers.

So here's my question. Why did the writers not write a better movie? Layman audiences can clearly spot the obvious problem and disliked the movie because of it. Why can't the experienced professional writers see and fix it?

[Assistant]
It takes a risk to make a good movie, because the more of a chance a movie has to be great, the more of a chance it has to be awful.

Setting out to make a mediocre movie is fairly risk-free. You follow a formula, and you know a certain amount of teenagers are going to watch it for the explosions.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[LOTR] If Shelob killed Frodo, would she have tried to claim the Ring?

Gollum's plan was for Shelob to kill the hobbits so then he could take the Ring. But would Shelob have allowed that? If Frodo was dead and the Ring was right there for her to take, wouldn't she try to claim it for herself?

[Assistant]
The ring was made by Sauron, and his malice and will to rule over others (which in itself was but the inherited will to rule of Morgoth) was imbued in the ring.
This is important because for the ring to give power to any creature, the creature must have a will (i.e. a soul or something alike). If a fox, a fish, algae or a crab were to touch the ring, it would not affect those creatures. As such, when the ring was lost in the Anduin, certainly it was exposed to life as there are fish and all sort of creature in the river. Only when Smeagle saw it that it was awakened and started exerting its power.

The children of Iluvatar have will and are affected by the ring. The dwarves were given will by  Iluvatar and are also affected. Supposedly the ents were also given will by Iluvatar, as to fulfil the wishes of Yavanna. The Maiar as Gandalf, Sauron and Durin's Bane (the balrog) also are affected by the ring. The great powers of Arda (the Valar) are above Sauron himself and most likely are unaffected by his malice and, therefore, the ring.

Dragons are a hard one to guess. Morgoth could not create life (i.e. create a creature with a soul. He could create a working body as Aule and Yavanna also did) because to do that he needed the Flame Imperishable with is within Iluvatar and his alone to use. So the dragons, as they are not maia, are made in mockery (i.e. Morgoth made artificial selection like we do with dogs) of some existing creature.  Depending of the creature that was corrupted, it could or not affect dragons.

And now, what about Shellob? Shellob was of the line of Ungolianth. Ungolianth was a primordial creature. We do not know what those creatures are and where they come from. They were not created by Morgoth nor are they servant, but they serve only themselves. If the Valar know what they are, they did not share with the Noldor or the Maiar, as none knows for sure what they are. So we can't be sure whether they have a soul or whether they would be affected. Knowing that even Morgoth could not bend those creatures to his will, Sauron would not stand a chance. Therefore Saurons creations, like the ring, would be incapable of influencing them as much as it was incapable of influencing Tom Bombadil.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
ELI5: To demonstrate the sensitivity of owls' hearing ability, we've been told that owls can hear mice running from hundreds of feet away. How do other sounds not muddle with the sounds of the footsteps?

If someone combined the voice of my friend with hundreds of other voices, it would sound like a glob of noise. How does this not happen with owls. Surely leaves rubbing together make the same amount noise as mice running, so there must be a lot of interference. How do they separate the different kinds of noise?

[Assistant]
Different frequencies, mostly.

Ears are physically tuned to certain frequencies.  In an owl, it's the higher frequencies -- the frequencies little mice make.  They literally hear them "louder" than other frequency sounds.

The brain also has a way of mentally tuning in/out sounds.  (Ever heard your name called in a crowded room despite hundreds of other voices?)


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: How can we distinguish something that is real news and fake news?

[Assistant]
First, look at the reputability of the source.  The source may be a *biased* source (every source is biased in its own way), but if it's reputable, then you can typically trust the facts.  If the source has a print edition or was around 30 years ago, its reputability increases.  If the source's headlines are typically sensationalized or "click-bait", its reputability decreases.  If the headlines are written in a way such as to make you feel angry, jubilant, or prideful, its reputability decreases.

Also, look for multiple reputable sources reporting the same facts.  If nobody else is reporting it, wait a day and see.  You don't always have to be up-to-the-second with whatever the news cycle is telling you.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
CMV: Garbage-men are heroes.

It has recently come to my attention that nobody respects trash collectors as much as most children do. Lots of children love garbage-men. Some children idolize trash collectors, and even aspire to be them. However, something happens as we grow up. For the most part, trash collectors lose their magic. We no longer support them like children do. Why is this? Trash collectors are still heroes. They deal with our waste; they are a pivotal part of society. They are essentially dealing with all the things we deem useless, and have no problem taking these things away from us. This often leads to them taking many things we would deem disgusting. Some (although, I understand it's probably not most) trash collectors even go through our disgusting trash and take out our recyclables for us. While that practice probably isn't a majority yet, it's still highlighting a potential that trash collectors have. It takes a very special type of person to be a garbage-man; they have to be able to deal with our (sometimes) disgusting waste. They are heroes.

Given the definition of heroes: "a person who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities." Trash collectors provide and service us with outstanding and pivotal achievements, as part of their jobs. Their noble qualities and courage comes with their ability to deal with our waste. The only reason why they don't fit the definition of heroes per se is because they are not typically admired by or idealized for the heroic qualities they possess. However, I argue that our collective perceptions of garbage-men are flawed, as they are in fact deserving of being called heroes.

[Assistant]
>  Why is this?

Because the novelty of "trash" wears off after growing up and anyone can pick up a trash can and dump it into a truck.

>  They deal with our waste; they are a pivotal part of society.

So is everyone else.

> This often leads to them taking many things we would deem disgusting.

Because that's what they get paid to do.

>  The only reason why they don't fit the definition of heroes per se is because they are not typically admired by or idealized for the heroic qualities they possess.

There's nothing heroic about what they do.

> While that practice probably isn't a majority yet, it's still highlighting a potential that trash collectors have.

That's a potential that literally every single person has.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
How efficient is chlorophyll in converting sunlight to energy compared to our best solar cells? If it is more efficient, why don't we copy what those cells do in designing new solar cells?

Presumably we know how plants convert sunlight to energy, so I was wondering if they do so more efficiently than we do with solar cells. Then I got to wondering that if they do, why we don't have some type of artificial chlorophyll that we could use for solar energy.

[Assistant]
>Presumably we know how plants convert sunlight to energy,

Plants convert solar energy into chemical energy with an efficiency around 3-6% depending on the species and other environment factors. Generally, our problem is that this chemical energy is not readily useful to us unless we first convert it into thermal energy (by burning it).

Solar photo-voltaic cells convert solar energy into electric energy with efficiency ranging from 6-45%. The high end of that scale are from experimental designs and may not be mass producible or cost effective. Solar cells in the 15-18% efficiency range are easily acquired on the market.

Solar thermal systems convert solar energy into steam which is then converted into electricity (typically with a steam turbine). A steam turbine in such a system is ~40% efficient but higher system efficiency can be achieved with multi-stage turbines. Environment factors like dust and mirror damage (which is used to focus solar energy) will reduce overall efficiency.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
Why are burns more prone to infection than lacerations or abrasions?

I was under the impression that the biggest threat with a burn is infection, why is that?

[Assistant]
Depending on how serious the burn is, it can destroy the skin to various depths. Thus opening the barrier that was there to keep infections away (notice how permeable your skin becomes at the burn site, it usually becomes shiny and wet as your plasma leaks out). Burns tend to have a bigger surface area than the other two wounds, and also harder to close through blood clotting and sabbing.

I think if you have a large and serious abrasion wound, it'd be similar to a burn wound in terms of the effect.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: Would bread go stale in space?

[Assistant]
Are you talking about in a vacuum or on board a space ship of space station?

In both cases the awnser is, yes.

Bread, and other pastries go stale because moisture in the bread evaporates.

So in a spaceship, the water is going to evaporate just as easily as on earth.

But what in the cold hard vacuum of space? Surely the water would freeze and nothing would happen.

Well, no. The bread would still go stale.

Of course the water would freeze, but even when it's frozen the water will slowly sublimate away probably forming an icy crust on the bread. And the bread itself will dessicate. Or freeze-dry.

You can actually try this. Stick a slice of bread in the freezer, and in a few weeks, or maybe a month or two it will be quite stale when you thaw it out.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: That unsettling feeling you get when you see a bad injury.

[Assistant]
It's called empathy mixed with a bit of realization.

Empathy is being able to imagine yourself in the same situation as someone else and having many of the feelings that come along with that situation.

The realization comes in when you look up and realize that it happened to someone and you suddenly feel terrible because one person will never be the same.

I believe this response varies from person to person so many of our answers will be different.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] [Star Wars] Were there any Clone Troopers that refused to execute Order 66?

[Assistant]
In Legends, yes. A large number did.

In canon, we don't know - since Order 66 is hardcoded into an implant in their brains, the only ones we know for sure don't do it are ones who had their chips removed, which we've seen five total do that, one of whom went crazy, another was killed while resisting arrest, and the other three are shown in *Rebels* season two.

Supposedly there was a sub-order to Order 66 that caused clones to fire on their brothers who managed to resist when the programming was initiated.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[DC Comics] How long is Supermans natural lifespan under a yellow sun?

Assuming he doesnt get sick, injured, or murdered, and that he leads a reasonably healthy lifestyle.

[Assistant] Immortal. His natural state is like that of humans, but the yellow sun is constantly charging up his cells keeping them from going through the decay that ours do, and he actually has the potential for more because the sun is constantly filling him a little more than it did last time.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: Why are food cans ribbed?

[Assistant]
Structural rigidity. Same reason corrugated cardboard is stronger than paperboard.

edit: a ribbed structure can be compressed because the ribs can bend and flex, whereas something like a soda can has a harder time being compressed because the metal might just shatter instead of bending.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] Does Nietzsche comment on enlightenment values in any way similar to his comparisions between judeo-christian and presocratic greek moralities?

[Assistant]
Maybe not as a whole, but definitely in certain measures.  We might find, for instance, a bit of the Will to Truth in the Enlightenment project of scientific reason.  (Nietzsche is not down with the Will to Truth.)  Similarly, we find in the political values of the Enlightenment commitments to freedom, liberty, and some measure of egalitarianism.   Nietzsche has a complicated relationship with the first two (he thinks of freedom being a slave value in some contexts) and has some rather infamous problems with egalitarianism.

Nietzsche is willing to critique almost any value since his critique is not leveled so much at particular values as it is leveled against certain modes of valuation and even valuation as such.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: If our body creates memory cells for immunity after we have an infection or virus, how come cancer survivors are more likely to contract cancer again and die from it?

[Assistant]
Cancer isn't bacteria or virus, it's you body's own cells malfunctioning. Normally your immune system can notice when cells are reproducing uncontrollably, but not always. They are your cells, not foreign bodies.

Even when tumors get destroyed, there are often still rogue cancer cells floating around in your blood that get missed. They're just too tiny to catch all of them, usually, so there is a chance they'll re-implant somewhere down the line and begin reproducing again, growing a new tumor.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: If an electrical outlet (120 volts) can kill you, how come a taser (50,000) can't?

[Assistant]
ELI5 version:

Voltage is like the speed of a projectile. Current is the weight of it.

A pea from a pea shooter may have the same speed as a cannon ball, but the cannon ball will hit harder.

So, the taser can deliver a lot of voltage, but not much current. So, basically, it's a pea shooter with an extreme muzzle velocity. It has a lot of sting, but it's still not a cannon.

The wall outlet, on the other hand, has less muzzle velocity, but it can deliver a really heavy projectile. Basically, a mortar.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: What would be the difference between a 48v 350w and a 36v 350w electric motor?

[Assistant] You could think of the motors like riding two different bicycles, one with a lower gear and one with a higher gear. If you ride both at the same speed, you're doing the same amount of work (the 350w), but the lower gear one would take less force but you'd have to pedal faster (the 36v one) and the higher gear one would take more force but you'd pedal slower (the 48v one).


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
How Do Spiders Know How To Make a Web?

Hi AskScience, the other day, I was lucky enough to see baby spiders float away like the end scene in Charlotte's Web as they emerged from their egg sack. It got me thinking, since the baby spiders don't learn web-making behavior from observing their parents then how do they know how to make a web?
I'm a layperson, so please be gentle!

[Assistant]
How do baby horses know how to walk? How do baby turtles know how to get to the ocean? How do baby humans know how to suck breasts?

Some complex behaviors are simply inborn and not learned. Animals develop the neural architecture that is necessary to perform these behaviors in the same way you develop an arm-- it is part of the body's developmental plan during pre-birth development.

The mechanisms behind these developmental plans are not understood in their entirety, but they generally depend on complex networks of signal feedback in the developing organism mediated by both cell-to-cell interactions and gradients of secreted factors.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] Why is a degree in philosophy always considered one of the most useless degrees of all? What do those of you currently studying philosophy wish to do after graduation?

[Assistant]
> Why is a degree in philosophy always considered one of the most useless degrees of all?

Well, it's not; though perhaps it's *often* considered this.

Presumably the reason for that is that people are under a lot of misapprehensions about the utility of different degrees.  On the basis likewise of traditional pedagogical principles, the requests employers make about what skills they'd like employees to have, the data we have on career success, and the data we have on standardized testing post-graduation, philosophy is among the highest performing majors.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[Star Wars] Would Anakin have been less likely to fall if Ahsoka's framing was handled better?

Anakin turning seems pretty sudden in Episode 3 over some relatively minor points. But if contextualized with TCW, it does make more sense that the seeds of distrust were planted and took root with how The Council handled Ahsoka. If they had remained loyal to their own from the beginning, would denying Anakin Masterhood and ignoring his concerns about Padme been more annoyances rather than poking at a still open wound?

[Assistant]
I dont get how people think Anakins fall is sudden, they spend 2 films setting up the premise that he is willing to disregard Jedi teachings if pushed too far, they also establish he is willing to break any of the Jedis rules to save someone he loves.

The entirety of Episode 3 he says he wont let Padme die, he spends all of Episode 2 ensuring Padme doesnt die. He flies into a murdering rage when his mother dies.

Anakins fall is because of his complete inability to accept loss and not become so attached to those in his life. The Jedi exacerbate that throughout his life with their dogmatic commitment to their rules and emotional control. Palpatine does the opposite, he feigns emotional intimacy and enticed him to break the rules. He does so to a vulnerable young man who is looking for someone to help him in a difficult situation, a situation where he cant turn to anyone he trusts other than Sidious.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
Why is Marx irrelevant in economics but important in other fields?

Many students in the humanities engage with Marx a great deal but it doesn't feel like this is the case for economists. Why is this?

[Assistant] Marx' economics doesn't really hold up, and hasn't had a lasting influence on the field.  He's influential outside of economics for non-economics ideas, such as "all history is the history of the class struggle", and the idea of "base versus superstructure".


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] When Oxygen was plenty, animals grew huge. Why aren't trees growing huge now given that there is so much CO2 in the atmosphere?

[Assistant] your initial statement about oxygen is only partially true.  During the oxygen peak of the carboniferous/permian, insects (and other arthropods like millipedes) did grow to ridiculous sizes compared to their relatives today.  These kinds of animals do appear to be limited in their growth by the availability of oxygen.  However, the non-avian dinosaurs which grew to be the largest land animals to ever walk the Earth lived at a time when oxygen was probably LOWER and at best about the same levels as they are today.  While increased oxygen levels definitely allow some kinds of invertebrates to grow larger, and may help vertebrate to grow larger, it is not the only factor by far affecting maximum growth sizes.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[Ghosts] why are so many ghosts so dickish?

So, I just moved. Old building, countryside, big garden, someone was murdered in there, generally nice place. But... There's a ghost. And he won't leave.

I tried everything: Oujija board, (not alone, I said hello and goodbye) an exorcist (he assured me it is no demon), the police (the murderer was found a decade ago, with evidence)... But he just. Won't. Leave.
I'm sick of buying new cups and unclogging my toilet everyday. Why are ghosts that haunt houses such huge assholes?

[Assistant]
Confirmation bias.

Nobody remembers (and often doesn't even know about) the silent ghost granny who likes to knit ghost sweaters in the attic when nobody is looking.

They all remember that asshole that clanked around and made you reflection bleed tho.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: How did Tim Tebow go from seemingly the most wanted quarterback to almost completely irrelevant so quickly?

[Assistant] He really wasn't a sought after QB, in the NFL. It was a surprise that he was taken in the first round. He was a very good college QB, because the skill set required is very much different for college vs. the NFL. He could bowl guys over in college--in the NFL, defenders are WAY bigger and faster. You get hit enough by those dudes and your career is lasting 2 years.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] [GEICO] If GEICO only insures humans, who insures the Gieco Gecko?

[Assistant]
The Geico Gecko is a special case, in that it needs no insurance. In fact, the Geico Gecko is immortal and eternal.

You may recall the 'fiction' film Matilda. You may remember, specifically, that Aunt Trunchbull was forced to drink a glass of water containing a gecko by Matilda. This film was not fiction. This film was a precise re-enactment of the events as Matilda remembers it, a vanity project now that as a telekinetic she is essentially a tiny god. She runs her own vast crime empire in the underworld, a brutal and terrible organisation filled with slave traders and used car salesmen.

But back to the gecko. Exposure to Matilda's powers, followed by the bizarre environment involved in the stomach of the Trunchbull (A nexus of negative energy) created the Geico Gecko. Bursting forth from the womb of hate, the Gecko found itself sentient and dead, with its body reparing itself quickly from any damage, even utter obliteration (The Gecko finds it very amusing to tear into nuclear plants. The Gecko rather likes bomb tests. The Gecko is making me write this). The Gecko can exercise telekinetic abilities thanks to the last experience it had before being drunk into The Trunchbull as well as some control over water, again, thanks to being immersed in the glass of water.

The Gecko works with Geico to gather money: Paying for the vast psychic amplifier it wishes to extend its powers of telekinesis is much easier than using slaves.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: What's the yellow liquid on top of the ink in my pen?

[Assistant]
It's a gel that stops the ink from drying up. It can't be a solid plug, the ink would stop coming out due to the partial vacuum created.

So, basically it's a movable plug to stop air getting to the ink.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
Are magnetic materials stronger than they would otherwise be without their magnetic field?

To clarify the title, does magnetic force within a magnetic object, like a natural magnet, contribute to its actual structural strength? Is say... a magnetized piece of iron stronger than a non-magnetized piece?

Would the magnetic force within the material hold the atoms more snugly together, or am I completely off-base in my understanding of this?

[Assistant] The short answer, no.  What makes a piece of iron non-magnetic isnt actually the lack of a magnetic field, but the randomness of it. Magnetism is based upon the spin the the electrons in the atoms. When something is magnetized, the direction of the spin of all atoms is aligned to the same direction. When its not magnetic, all of those spins still exist, theyre just in random directions.  These spins have no direct impact on the structural integrity of the material.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
Can I duck dive under a tidal wave?

If I were treading water in the ocean and a massive tidal wave was approaching me, would it be possible for me to swim under the wave and wait for it to pass?

[Assistant]
No.

A tidal wave, or tsunami, has a small amplitude (wave height) and very, very large wavelength.  If you were well offshore, you might not  even notice it. If you were near the shore, it would be like the water just coming and coming and coming at you.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[Superhero] I can make pocket dimensions by painting them. Who has jurisdiction over this "terra nullis" as the authority of the United Staes claims?

They can't enter my painting without my specific permission and even if they destroy the painting while I'm inside, I can still paint my way out. Can a country really claim jurisdiction if they can't enforce their will on that territory?

[Assistant]
Jurisdictions, borders, etc. are essentially diplomatic alternatives/complementary to shows of force to exert control. With you being the sole force-owner for that space, unless you yield that control, anything they claim is moot.

They can enforce consequences on you otherwise in an attempt to coerce though.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: How do you properly use ";' and "-" in writing?

[Assistant]
The semicolon is properly used in at least two ways.

First, it can be used to separate items in a list when some of those items contain commas. For example, a normal list would go like this: Apples, pears, bananas, and kiwi fruit. (Note: that last comma is not used by everyone. It is called the "Oxford comma", and people actually argue over whether or not it's necessary.)

But suppose the second item is "pears, but not Williams pears". Now it contains a comma; and so to make sure people can read the list easily, you have to write it like this: Apples; pears, but not Williams pears; bananas; and kiwi fruit.

Secondly, the semicolon is used to separate contact clauses. This is when you have two sentences and you want to join them into one sentence, but without using a conjunction. For example, if we start with these two sentences:

Mary likes beer. John prefers wine.

We can join them up with a conjunction:

Mary likes beer, but John prefers wine.

Or we can join them up with a semicolon:

Mary likes beer; John prefers wine.

Words like "however" are adverbs, not conjunctions, so if you want to use "however" to join these two sentences, you still need a semicolon:

Mary likes beer; however, John prefers wine.

How can you tell the difference? Well, you can move "however" next to the verb and it still makes sense:

Mary likes beer; John, however, prefers wine.

As for the hyphen, that's a much more complicated thing. Perhaps the most important use is to combine two words into one single concept, but it's much tickier to get this one right. In the sentence:

He was five years old.

we have "five" and "years" and "old" as three separate words; but in this sentence:

He was a five-year-old boy.

the three words are combined into a single unit, an adjective.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] [Star Wars] Since there are no forests, is the oxygen supply in Coruscant artificially produced? How does it stay breathable for humans?

[Assistant] If recall from the book version of Phantom Menace the atmosphere is maintained through giant oxygen regulators/carbon dioxide scrubbers which filter and purify the air.  Even with this technology though, the lower you lived in the planet (lower level of buildings, deep down alleyways, etc), the more polluted the air tended to be.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
ELI5: Do other languages have as many accents as English? Why or why not?

There are wildly different English accents across the globe, but does this happen with other languages? I feel like it would, but I've never heard/seen anything about it.

[Assistant]
Everyone is giving examples of specific languages, so I'll just give a general answer: it's a resounding yes. Virtually all languages will have some kind of accent variation based on geography. Accents may also be based on things like social class or ethnicity, and other languages will have those as well.

You hear more about this for English because it has the most widespread community of speakers (and in your case, OP, you hear about it because it's your language).


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[MCU] Why is there only one Winter Soldier?

The Winter Soldier was created when Zola experimented on Bucky, presumably copying some of Erskine's work. The experiment was a complete success, and unlike Erskine, Zola wasn't killed and alive for decades afterwards.

So why didn't Hydra build a legion of Winter Soldiers? They had decades to perfect the process and put it into production, but just stopped.

[Assistant]
There are two reason that come to mind.

1. We don't know if Bucky was unique or not.  While, Bucky was a complete success that doesn't mean that there weren't many other failures.  Zola obviously saw the potential of his experiments so it is reasonable to assume that he did try to create other Winter Soliders.  It could have been that for whatever reason Bucky was special and the only success.

2. Hydra was attempting to stay under the radar.  Hydra was was having to walk a very fine line between being secretive enough to not be exposed and being active enough to grow in power.  Every Winter Soldier they had would require more support and resources.  Additionally, there would have likely been similarities between the Winter Soldiers, this would have drawn attention to the program and Hydra.  A single skilled assassin could be from anywhere; he could be a government agent, a member of a violent NGO, or he could be freelance.  Being the only visible Winter Soldier makes it much harder for people to see a pattern.  And they did a good job of keeping him secret.  Black Widow only knew rumors about him, and Nick Fury didn't seem to have any particular information about him; though being Nick Fury he may have withheld information.  A single Winter Soldier best fulfills one of Hydras man concerns; not being exposed until they are ready.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[Batman:TAS]Would plastic surgery fix the damage done to Two-Face?

Immediately after the accident, the doctor treating Harvey says he's  scheduled a plastic surgery consult. Was the full extent of the damage not immediately known? Or did the chemicals continue to change him even after he was treated at the hospital?

[Assistant] It would fix his face sure but not his mind. In Batman The Dark Knight Returns, which is set with an older retired Batman, Harvey Dent did have plastic surgery for his face. However, his mind was still fragmented and he returned to crime shortly after.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[Lord of the Rings Books] All armor that I read about seemed to be mail, or perhaps scale armor. Did full suits of plate armor exist?

If not, why not? The Numenoreans and Noldor and ancient Dwarves had very advanced crafting, at least.

[Assistant]
During the events of LOTR, Middle Earth is in something of a "Dark Ages." Much knowledge was lost when Numenor fell and their "craft" (for lack of a better term) continued to decline as they mixed Numenorean blood with those of lesser men. Perhaps at Gondor's peak they had such armor, but after its collapse, they probably lacked the resources, let alone the talent to maintain and create such armor.

Dwarves certainly could create such armor but probably not inclined to do so. Axes are a favored weapon of the dwarves and work very well against plate armor. Dwarves would probably be disinclined to create a kind of armor that is weak to their preferred weapon.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[James Bond] Who are the other 00 agents?

Has 007 ever collaborated with them or do they work alone?

[Assistant]
James Bond's mission in Arkhangelsk in 1986 was a team effort between 007 and 006, Alec Trevelyan, with 006 ending up seemingly killed in action.

Agent 009's death in 1983 in Berlin is also the impetus for 007's mission, but they don't meet.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: Why is it cheaper to imprison someone for life than to give them the death penalty?

[Assistant] People who receive the death penalty are entitled to an extensive appeal process which can be very expensive. People who are imprisoned for life are not given the same privilege. This is because killing someone is an irreversible act and we don't want to make mistakes (Unfortunately we still do). The appeal process is very expensive as it takes years, sometimes decades and lawyers are not cheap.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] In Terminator, when they say skynet "begins learning at a geometric rate," what does that mean?

[Assistant]
A geometric progression, or geometric sequence, is a sequence of numbers where each number is obtained by multiplying the previous number by some constant.

For example:
1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, ...
Every next number is twice the previous number.

But the following is also a geometric sequence:
1, 0.9, 0.81, 0.729, 0.6561
Here the multiplication factor between two consecutive numbers is 0.9.

In general, geometric sequences are discretized equivalents of exponential functions. The defining characteristic is that the rate of growth is propotional to the size (or: the first derivative of the function is proportional to the function value).

In movies and series, the term "exponential growth" (and apparently "geometric rate") is typically used as a technical term for "it grows faster and faster" even though it's not always used 100% correctly.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
ELI5...If aliens put a satellite into earth orbit to observe us, would we even notice with all the other satellites up there?

Topic.

[Assistant]
Yes. Astronomers carefully track all sattelites - as do some world governments. Even space junk is tracked.

Astronomers need to know where sattelites and debris are so it does not interfere with looking at stars.

Governments want to know where spy sattelites are and who is looking at what.

NASA and other space agency's track space junk and sattelites so stuff they launch into space does not collide with it.

So, things orbiting our planet are carefully examined.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
lab politics is killing me

I am a research fellow at a lab which has 2 active collaborations at other institutes.
I have been working here for 3 months and I have noticed that the team which I am a part of and includes two other people is actively involving in institutional politics .
The other two of my team mates often
1) sit with each other discussing about lab people and lab projects for sometimes hours in a row.
2) discussion of propspective project idea without including me.
3) when I give them any ideas or opinion I'm given cold shoulder.
4) they were not like this for the first month when they included me in their discussions but now they don't do that.
5) they plan and plot their moves and leave me to fend myself in an as it is complicated collaborative situation.
6) they taunt/criticise me and casually make jokes at my expense.
7) one of them was my classmate but he doesn't even behave like a friend anymore.

What do I do.

[Assistant]
Kick the living shit out of one of them and make sure the other one sees you do it.

Make sure to posture like a chimpanzee after. Chest banging and all that shit. The other one will get the picture quick.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] [Harry Potter] every time a horcrux is destroyed, Voldemort has a freak out because of him having a connection to it (it is a piece of his soul after all). Did the same thing not happen when he killed that part of himself inside of Harry? I feel like it should have.

[Assistant]
In the books he does not feel it when a horcrux is destroyed because he has been disconnected from them for so long.

However, when he blasted Harry he was also affected by it and fell down. Whether this is because of the horcrux dying is unknown, but Bellatrix attempted to help him up and he rebuffed her.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] [World of Warcraft] So I come to Draenor and find "True Iron Ore" all over the place. If this is true iron, what the hell is this grey metal I've been mining in Redridge for the last 9 years? Furthermore, how is it different from (apparently) fake iron?

[Assistant] True Iron and Iron are entirely different metals, the same as Truesilver and Silver are different. The name is simply the product of idiot Orcs naming the stuff, and humans just using the translation.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[Star Wars] Would Sidious have intervened in the crash landing?

So Anakin successfully pilots the wrecked *Invisible Hand* down to the surface of Coruscant. The back half of the ship was torn off as they entered the atmosphere, so there was very little control and it was more like a disaster that they happened to survive.

Sidious of course is still acting like Palpatine the freed hostage. He looks nervous and concerned. How far would Sidious allow this crash landing to go without dying himself? He couldn't risk them discovering his use of the Force, but he's not the type to die to hide his ability.

My only thought here is that he had perhaps foreseen his survival or perhaps his future acts. He also might have had Battle Meditation going on at that stage, or perhaps he could use the dark side right next to the Jedi due to his masterful conceiling abilities. Thoughts?

[Assistant] I think maybe he doesn't get enough credit for his go getter attitude. We tend to think of all bad guys as selfish and all self preserving but with a plan as bold as his, the very real possibility of death must have been faced at many turns. He had a go big or go home attitude and was prepared for an unexpected death in the pursuit of his goals. Fortune favors the bold.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: In neutral terms, how the Rothchild family became so rich, why they are not very public and why there are so many conspiracy theories surrounding them.

[Assistant]
In neutral terms it is far less interesting.  They became rich via banking, and that's really the end of it.  Most if not all the conspiracy theories about them are really about how fractional reserve banking is evil. What better target than old money bankers involved in an evil money making conspiracy theory.

They are out of public view today because most of the wealth has been diminished and divided among decedents.   People like George Soros  in modern times make way better public targets for conspiracy theories.

Solid research into the Rothschild conspiracy theories will show you just how little conspiracy theorists really know about the topic and how much of a leap they are asking you to take.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
What physical quantities are upper-bounded?

Are there any upper-bounded physical quantities like velocity?
Does the current model predict an upper limit on temperature, acceleration, electromagnetic-waves frequency, ...?

[Assistant]
Loudness of sound is bounded by the density of a substance. Because sound is a pressure wave, and because a wave peak cannot be any higher than the depth of its trough, the amplitude of a sound wave is bounded by a relationship relative to its density. For air on earth, it is ~194db, the difference between 0atm and 2atm.

Thus, you can have louder "sounds" in water than in air, and even louder than that in stone. "Sounds" in quotes here because at that point, we're really just talking about pressure waves.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
Could a generated magnetic field protect a spacecraft and astronauts from charged particles and em radiation?

From my understanding, solar wind and cosmic rays are bombarding Earth constantly and are being deflected in part by the atmosphere and partially by Earth's magnetic field. Can this sort of shielding be replicated and how much energy would be required to produce a magnetic field capable of radiation shielding.

[Assistant]
There is still significant research to be done and hurdles to overcome with this. However, US Patent application ID US 12/990,420 is for a magnetic radiation shiled.

>In order to provide an effective shield, the strength if the shield magnetic field at the source is perferably at least 1x10^-4 Tesla. To obtain a boundary between the shield magnetic field and a typical solar wind background magnetic field of around 1x10^-7 Tesla at a distance of up to a few hundred meters from the spacecraft a field strength of less than .1 Tesla at the magnetic field source will be generally sufficient. Allowing for effects if field persistence in the plasma environment, average electrical power from about 100W to 10kW, and more preferably from about 500W to 5kW may be provided by the power supply to drive the magnetic field source to generate the shield magnetic field.

This would be for a spacecraft about the size of a desk.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
ELI5: Where does thunder (sound component of lighting) come from?

I get the concept the lighting is electronic plasma in a supercharged cloud looking for the shortest path to the ground to discharge or something but why is it fricking loud?

[Assistant]
Lighntning is a sudden, strong stream of electrons between clouds and the ground.

Those electrons heat the air so much, that the air surrounding the lightning bolt can, for a fraction of a second, exceed the temperature of the surface of the sun, by a lot in fact.  The surface of the sun is around 10,000F, and the air surrounding a lightning bolt can be 50,000F!

Because the air around that superheated column of air is super cold (compared to the column that was heated), it suddenly cools the hot air creating a vacuum.  Kind of like how when you blow out a candle, the smoke swirls and expands and contracts as the heated air mixes with the relatively cool air outside the candle.  Now imagine this same 'swirling' on a MUCH larger scale.

Thunder sounds like crashing because that is, basically, what's happening.  Huge columns of air crashing and smashing into each other as the hot air and cold air combine.  This shockwave is heard and even felt if you're close enough!  (Have you ever had thunder rattle your windows?)


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] Why doesn't my field of view change when my pupils contract/dilate?

[Assistant]
Field of view depends on focal length -- the distance between the lens and the retina (technically the ratio between the size of the retina and the focal length).

The size of the pupil is the aperture size, it only changes how much light enters the eye, just like in a camera.

The reason for this is that the pupil is not a "hole" that you're looking out of. There is a lens that that focuses all the light at one point (provided it's in focus) no matter how large the pupil is. So a narrow pupil is not like "tunnel vision," and a wide one won't increase field of view, because of the lens. All those rays that come in far off-center will get focused on the same point as the center ray.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
Private property, best arguments for and against

I'm familiar with Locke's argument of natural property rights but I find it quite unconvinving really, is there any other arguments which build on it/are based on it with great detail?

Would also like to read some proper philosophical arguments against the idea of private property, is there Marx/Engles I should be reading or any other reccomendations people have?

[Assistant] In Hegel's Philosophy of Right he offers a defense of property by claiming that property is an extension of the individual will, and in order to be fully free we must be able to make our will exist in the external world through property.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: If Puerto Rico votes to become a state, how would/could the US proceed?

[Assistant]
Legally speaking, voting to become a state is irrelevant.  It is a signal that a territory is ready to become a state, but congress is under no obligation to act upon it.  Similarly, congress could make PR a state even if it voted against it.

The power rests solely in congress, any vote in the PR is purely symbolic.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
ELI5: Why is it that when a person has an epileptic seizure/fit that they feel so tired and out of it for such a long time.

Asking as I'm epileptic and it throws me out for a good day or two like I've not slept in days.

[Assistant] Immediately following a seizure is what's known as the postictal state. In this state, the person is pretty much completely out of it. Yeah, they're "awake," but not really. They just kinda sit there and look exhausted. That's because they are! You could say seizing is expensive for the body. In the brain, the uncontrolled firing of millions, if not billions of neurons  takes **a lot** of energy. This energy comes in the form of glucose, and when a person has a seizure their brain neurons can burn through nearly all their energy stores. If the seizure extends to physical convulsions, then the same process happens in your muscles. Having every muscle contract randomly and uncontrollably is taxing. It can take your body hours, sometimes days to rebuild all of the glycogen stores in your cells, leaving you feeling tired and "out of it."


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] If the voltage id high enough, would electricity be able to arc in space?

[Assistant]
What we see as an arc is the effect of molecules in the air being excited by the impact of electrons that are accelerated by the voltage. These excited molecules then fall back to a lower energy state and emit a photon. This is the light we see when there's an electric arc.

In space, without air, there's nothing to excite and emit photons. Instead, if you'd apply a voltage between two electrodes in space, you will have any free electrons (or electrons emitted by the negative electrode) being pulled towards the positive electrode.

But that's it. There'll be no visible phenomenon and the electrons simply follow the electric field lines toward the positive electrode, instead of flowing through clearly defined thin channels as is the case with an electric arc in arc.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: What is the difference between computer science and computer engineering?

[Assistant]
Computer engineering is primarily about designing computer hardware.

Computer science is primarily about the theory of how computers work and what they can do. It also tends to include "how to write computer software," but that's really a separate field usually labeled software engineering.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[Star Wars] Are all members of Yoda's species Force Sensitive?

I know of three members of Yoda's species (Yoda, Yaddle, and Grogu), and all three of them are force sensitive. Do they all just have Force Sensitivity by chance like everyone else, or are ALL members of the species Force Sensitive?

[Assistant] Those are the only known members of their species so as far as we know, we could say yes. But thats not really a lot to go on, they could have been a very isolated species that doesnt get out into the greater galaxy much and the only three we know were pulled into the order.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
ELI5: Why do we not feel the weight of water above us in swimming pools?

If we placed, for example, 100 litres of bottled water on our body when lying flat on the ground we would expect the bottles to feel heavy against our body (pushing down on us). Why is it that when we are at the bottom of a swimming pool with hundreds of litres of water on top of us we feel no such pressure?

[Assistant]
You do feel the pressure. You need diving equipment because you feel the pressure. Your ears pop because you feel the pressure. Submarines need to withstand the pressure.

Edit: It occurs to me now that you meant "why don't we get pushed deep underwater because of the pressure above", and the answer to that is that the pressure below you is larger than the pressure above you, so there is actually a force pushing up. This is buoyancy. There's more pressure below you because if there are 100 liters above you, there are more than 100 liters above the bottom of you, if that makes sense.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
ELI5: Where exactly does all the fat and especially excess skin go when we lose weight?

Does the extra dead skin just fall off at a higher than normal rate? How does the body "know" it doesn't need it anymore?

EDIT: I've marked this as "explained" because the first post did explain it for me, but there is not a secondary question that has popped up: "How much weight loss will result in excess skin on average?" Asked by raisinsmith.

[Assistant]
Skin is flexible.  It stretches in all sorts of ways.

Fat is also flexible.  Fat cells simply get bigger. (although they are replaced, you don't have less than this or more than that, unless all the fat cells are full, in which case, more fat cells will be made... and then destroyed when you don't need the excess cells anymore.)

So when you lose fat, you're losing the contents inside the fat cell.  This fat is turned into energy.  Your fat literally 'melts' away from being burned as heat and energy and waste products.

Now, when the fat cells get smaller, the skin retracts.  Eventually, depending on the person, it can retract back to where it should be.

However, if the skin has been stretched for too long, or for way too much fat, then the skin's elasticity is not as great as it should be, so it will literally be hanging off you.  At this point, skin removal surgery is sometimes indicated.  Either for asthetic reasons (You don't like it) or actual health reasons (The extra skin is difficult to keep healthy because of it's hanging/folding about)

There ya go.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] What is going on in a tree stump immediately after the tree is cut down? Does the stump continue to try to live? Is the tree instantly dead like a human would be if the human suffered something equally catastrophic?

[Assistant]
stumps OFTEN try to come back, and succeed.

They rely on stored energy in the roots to produce new shoots that are quickly productive on a small-scale.  The root infrastructure for getting water and minerals is still strong.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5 - If the brain releases chemicals that paralyse the body during sleep, how come people still turn around many times throughout the night?

[Assistant]
That is because sleep always goes in cycles.
These chemicals are released during a REM cycle. You get about 4 of them and they last around 20/30 minutes.
These are the times where your brain activity is high but you get paralyzed becaude otherwise your body would act upon your brain activity.

Otherwise you are not paralyzed but your brain activity is extremely low. These are the times where you turn around.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: Is there a difference between having two 4-hour sleeps or having one 8-hour sleep? Why?

[Assistant] There are four stages of sleep. The last one, REM (rapid eye movement) sleep, is what really counts because it's when you really get to rest and recuperate. However, to get there you have to go through the earlier stages and then back out to wake up. If you sleep for 8 hours straight then you spend more time in REM sleep than you would with two 4 hour sleeps.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
Do North Koreans know how physically tiny their country is?

I've noticed that on N. Korean propaganda videos, when the world or a globe is shown, North Korea never is. It got me wondering whether this is done on purpose. If citizens saw how tiny and relatively insignificant the country is (about 1/100th the size of China for example) they may start to question all of the "we are the greatest and most powerful" propaganda.

[Assistant]
The better question is, do NK citizens buy *any* of the propaganda, or do they recognize it for what it is and just put up with it?

But a country's size really isn't at issue, after all Germany is the size of Wisconsin and gave the world a run for its money. Economic and industrial capacity and efficiency is more important than size.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] How does hair conditioner work, and why do we use it?

[Assistant] Conditioner reduces friction between the strands. The mechanism by which conditioner works is pretty f interesting. The chemical structure of hair has a lot of amino acid cysteine, when washed they tend to gain a negative electrostatic charge due to the removal of a proton. The ingredients in conditioners are attracted to this charge; once attached it helps to lubricate the hair and reduce frizz.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] Can plants get viruses or transmit them?

[Assistant]
Yep! In fact, the first virus to be discovered attacked tobacco plants, the tobacco mosaic virus.

Plant viruses do have to figure out how to get through cell walls, and they have to be able to spread without relying on their hosts moving around, so they're a bit different from viruses who go after animals.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[Star Wars] Why was the Force unbalanced? And did Anakin Skywalker bring balance to it?

If the Jedi believed the Sith were extinct why did they believe the Force was unbalanced? What balance did they think Anakin would bring? And if he did bring balance how did he do it?

[Assistant]
Balancing the Force means removing the taint of the Dark Side from the galaxy, since evil represents a perversion of the intent of the Force.

The Force is the embodiment of life, and the connectivity between all things. The Dark Side is an inversion: selfishness, the accumulation of power with no regard for others.

Anakin balanced the Force by eliminating both himself and the Emperor. An additional argument can be made that he removed the unhealthy corruption of the Late Republic Jedi Order, which had become self-serving and unfocused.

(Breaking the 4th wall: So many people disagree with this answer, but it's straight from George Lucas. It's perfectly possible that the new trilogy will alter this interpretation of the Force, but until then this is about as correct as you could be.)


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
CMV: a guilty finding in most courts, is a 5-10 year ticket to poverty.

This is the kind of population control that exists today, but since it doesnt affect those who soundly reside in the system, as such, it doesnt matter to them.

In this case them is anyone who can pass a CORI check. Its really pretty sick; you were bad, so lets lock you out of good jobs and make you wash dishes. That wont make a criminal even more resentful right? there are exclusionary tactics EVERYWHERE, and really the only downside I have against people around me?? Is my criminal record I work harder, for less money than you. It wont last.

[Assistant]
Prisons dont need to be like that. Plenty in other countries teach life skills and give rehabilitation therapy to prisoners that dont land them in poverty.

Also plenty of countries have good safety nets that stop that as well.

What would you like to be done with prisoners? A 5-10 year sentence is usually a severe crime.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
CMV: Luxury watches are useless in the practical sense

I am not talking about the watch you use time your interval training, or the waterproof watch you bring for diving. I am not even talking about smart watches such as the Apple watch.

Im talking about the Rolexes. This piece of luxury good is special in that it serves no conceivable practical function as almost everyone carries around a smartphone with them nowadays, even in LEDCs. A sports car can go faster than a Toyota. A big house can give you a sense of spaciousness and comfort. A private yacht can be used to travel on water. The luxury watch, on the other hand, is clearly poorer at telling the time than the synchronised smartphone.

Moreover, since the watch is even more expensive than a smartphone, you would be even more worried of losing it.

Not discussing about it being a status symbol, just the practical functionality. Anyway possessing a status symbol may be viewed positively or negatively by different people. I personally silently judge the people who prefer to put the 20k into a watch than into an ETF.

[Assistant]
Do you consider a necktie to be useless in a practical sense?  Or makeup?  Or tooth whitening toothpaste?

A luxury watch is like any other accessory, it is designed to make us more attractive, either to others or ourselves.  A feeling of confidence from looking good can propel you through all kinds of stressful situations, which seems plenty practical to me.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[the culture] are drones human conscience in robotic bodies or are they sentient machines ?

And what's this 1:1 intelligence, is it a rating system for how smart a thing is ?

[Assistant]
They're sentient machines created and raised in such a way that they can interact with humans in a natural fashion.
It's possible for humans to become drones, but this is considered eccentric and would result in awkward interactions with other drones.

Drones tend to have mental capacity generally similar to humans, or at least within the same order of magnitude, as opposed to Minds who may as well be gods compared to us (they simulate universes for fun, for pete's sake).

It seems drones have a lineage going back all the way to AIs created before the creation of the Culture meta-civilisation, and may well share origins with the Minds.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] What happens to the puss in the pimples you don't pop?

[Assistant]
Your body reabsorbs it. The pus contains the cells (phagocytes) that eat the intruding microbes or foreign material of some sort. The pus is kind of in a capsule to protect neighboring cells and tissue from further infection. So don't pop it.

Edit: Changes macrophages to phagocytes.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
ELI5: What is the benefit of making/using charcoal as opposed to regular wood?

Why do we make charcoal? I don't see how charcoal could have more potential energy than the original wood it came from since it used to be wood and some of it has already been spent.

[Assistant]
While wood has more potential energy, a lot of it is wasted evaporating/boiling water and other noncombustible impurities.  By heating wood slowly in the absence of oxygen, these impurities are removed, leaving mostly the combustibles.

This makes charcoal lighter, yet because it is porous and lacks the noncombustibles, it burns at a hotter temperature, hot enough to melt metals like iron.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
ELI5: Why does a candle need a wick in order for the wax to burn?

Wow, this really blew up! Thanks everyone who answered :)

[Assistant] The wax doesn't burn while it's solid, or even liquid. It melts and gets sucked up the wick where the heat of the flame boils it and the vapors burn. A big old pool of wax will burn without a wick, but you have to get it super hot first and get it to start boiling and those fumes need to ignite and keep the thing going.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[The Matrix] What are the downsides to being in the Matrix?

Okay, so you're a prisoner but you have no idea about it, and if you feel like something's wrong then it's nothing more than a nagging itch at the back of your mind. A shrink would probably diagnose you with some kind of disassociative disorder and prescribe some medication.

To over seven billion people, The Matrix is real in every meaningful way, and all of them (give or take a few thousand) apparently suffer not one bit for being a part of it. Why resist The Matrix?

[Assistant] The Matrix enforces arbitrary restrictions which limit human ambitions.  One man managed to incur the wrath of several agents just because he broke the 100m record.  If humans start to develop an in-Matrix AI, expand to the stars, etc., the machines would step in and say no.  The world of the Matrix is stagnant.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
How does body hair "measure" its own size and when to stop growing?

Body hair has a set length (correct me if i am wrong but afaik it is set in the genes?), but how does a single hair "know" how long it currently is or when to stop growing?

[Assistant]
>Body hair has a set length

Close.  Each hair has a set **time** for it to grow.  After spending that set time growing, it will fall out and a new hair will start growing from the follicle.

So, for instance, if you cut a hair, it won't grow to its full length.  Rather, it will keep growing for its set time limit.  But with lots of hair all grouped together, and with each hair on a separate "timer" (that is, they're not synchronized), you get the overall appearance of hair regrowing to a set length.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[Superman] Would Superman prefer to live on Earth or Krypton?

I'm reminded of a Justice League episode where Superman is stuck living his ideal life. He lives on Krypton and isn't married to Lois. That strikes me as odd for a guy raised on Earth his entire life, but I guess it's not a black and white issue.

[Assistant]
I mean, he wants to have grown up at home with his parents on a world that wasn't destroyed. Every kid would. It doesn't mean he doesn't love Ma and Pa, he just sometimes wishes he didn't have to.

He's never looked for a chance to permanently leave Earth to return "home" though. And he had a restored Kryptonian city in a bottle and never moved there. In one instance he imagined Kryptonians resettling on Earth en masse and lead the resistance against them.

So it's not really that he wants to change his current life, he just thinks about how his life might have been different.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] [Alien] Judging by our current military and defense capabilities of all countries, how many Xenomorphs would it take to overrun the planet?

[Assistant] In one of the books a bus full of fanatics crashed through a research compound hell-bent on being impregnated by these monsters. Within months the planet was swarming with them and people were abandoning Earth. It started with about 20 people.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[Star Wars] How many planets are there in the New Republic, and what are those worlds doing right now?

There must have been -- thousands? tens of thousands? millions? of planets in the New Republic. The First Order destroyed five of them, in *The Force Awakens*. Why don't the remaining worlds choose new leadership according to whatever the succession laws are, scramble their ships (even with one warship per planet, it adds up to an enormous fleet) and just mop the floor with the First Order?

[Assistant]
The thing was, the worlds they blew up included the capital - where pretty much everyone of any political note was.

We don't know how many worlds were in the New Republic. We only know it was smaller than the Galactic Republic, and much more of a loose federation of worlds than its predecessor governments were.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] [Star Wars] I am a powerful Force user who chooses to openly follow Sith philosophy as far as the law will permit me without breaking it. Will the Jedi council allow me to embrace my beliefs in peace, including approaching other Force sensitives in the search for my own apprentice?

[Assistant] Jedi Council doesn't go after people just on basis of their religious beliefs. Just look at Nightsisters. Although given that you're a very powerful force user, who practices sith teachings, it won't be long until the law becomes just another chain for you, at which point Jedi would be fully justified in bringing your darksider ass to justice.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
CMV: A traditional "zombie apocalypse" as media presents it is a practical impossibility.

This is really more of a fun one. But most of the time I watch a movie or a TV show of this subject, my cynicism is always nagging me. Ofcourse it's fiction, and creative liberty can be taken, and I am obviously willing to accept some compromises in realism, proportionate to how much fantasy is involved. But in most - 28 Days Later, The Walking Dead, World War Z, and so on, it's just too much for me to swallow.

First off, I'm fairly loose on the definition of traditional - animalistic husks of people, be it actually undead, or still alive but acting as a vector for disease, whether they can run, are limited to a slow walk, or even swim, has no impact in how I would see the outcome. My only major stipulation is that the "disease" is spread physically from infected to uninfected(via a bite or bodily fluid), but I'll also accept the means of simply turning after death as depicted in TWD.

I do not think that primal, unthinking, unarmed creatures could overrun the human race. Almost every advantage possible goes to us. How on earth is a being, who's potentially only means of reproduction, is also their number one predator, and one of their primary sources of food, supposed to survive? Even if they don't need to feed, and we remove that from equation, it's still just a ridiculous notion. They have to seek out "prey" that is incomparably more intelligent than them, sometimes, far faster than them, and significantly more armed than them. It wouldn't be so bad, if humans didn't have access to weapons that can put zombies down from 300 meters away, or means of defence that are untouchable, be it in the form armoured vehicles and aircraft. A hallmark of the genre seems to involve characters walking amidst the ruins of military hardware, and it's like the writers just want to flaunt the sheer implausibility of it all. Even with the full surprise factor afforded to a zombie horde, the disarray it could cause shouldn't be any match for the might of modern day communications.

It would be like engaging in WW1 over-the-top trench warfare against an enemy you have zero understanding of, with no comprehension for what kind of firepower lies in wait for you above the parapet, completely unable to communicate with your comrades, and armed only with your hands. These questions have over time generated a weird kind of hatred for the genre. I still find them fun to watch, but I have to switch my brain off and bite my tongue half the time.

[Assistant]
>World War Z

Have you actually read the book World War Z?  Or have you just seen the ~~movie~~ unrelated cash grab?  Because the book World War Z actually addresses a lot of the points you make.

In addition, there are a lot of variations in how the story is told.  True, something like *28 Days Later* is unlikely to work, because in that movie people don't automatically become rage zombies on death, they can only become a rage zombie by being bitten or coming into contact with the fluids of another rage zombie.  But worlds like *The Walking Dead*, *WWZ*, and *Z Nation* actually have something you're missing that would make a zombie apocalypse possible (even if it still might be unlikely, depending on the specifics):  *everybody who dies becomes a zombie*.

That means that every person who dies, of natural causes or otherwise, becomes an undead creature who only desires to harm the living.  In WWZ in particular, even the long dead and buried come back to life.  This means that even people who have no contact with zombies have the potential to add to the horde.

In addition, the zombies in WWZ are basically immune to all methods of termination aside from total destruction (burning them to a pile of ashes) or well-placed headshots (has to actually destroy substantial portions of the brain, not just touch the brain).  They also feel no fear, can't be bought, can't be reasoned with, and do not tire.  A well-placed grenade may take out a dozen or so zombies if you're extremely lucky, but not only will those who don't get hit in the head keep on walking towards you, but the rest of the swarm will just keep on swarming.  They don't have morale like humans do.  Again, WWZ goes into much greater detail.

In short, while some versions of the "Zombie plague" have basically zero chance of causing the end of civilization, other versions would be much much more difficult to deal with than you're implying.  (This is also setting aside the human element, i.e. human panic and survival instinct making things worse).


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri]Why would anyone choose to follow Chairman Yang?

I mean, the faction description outright says "brutal serfdom".  If it's the appeal of an orderly society, Miriam and Santiago offer that.  If it's about not letting archaic morality stand in the way of human progress, Zacharov offers that.

[Assistant] You've escaped a dying Earth, only to have your spaceship suffer a critical systems failure shortly before arriving at your destination. You're not particularly keen on the notion of a divine plan at this point. Santiago does seem to have what it takes to survive in a cruel, uncaring universe, but the militancy is a bit off-putting. You don't want to pit yourself against your fellow humans until you're all dead - you want to work *with* them to achieve something greater. You want to be a *part of something.* Zacharov doesn't care about humanity - he just needs people to run his science experiments. But Yang...Yang has a vision. A world where every single human has a place where they belong. Where every single human *matters* to the greater whole. What could be better than that?


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[Dune] Why did the Emperor give Duke Leto of House Atreides the planet Arrakis if he was only going to let the Harkonnens attack them later on even giving the Harkonnens ferocious Sardaukar troops in disguise. Why not just attack the Duke on his home planet of Caladan?

The Emperor sees House Atreides as a potential future rival and threat, and conspires with House Harkonnen, currently in charge of spice harvesting on Arrakis and longstanding enemies of House Atreides among the other Great Houses of the Landsraad, to destroy Leto and his family after their arrival. Leto is aware his assignment is a trap of some kind, but cannot refuse. But what was the trap? It just seems the Emperor just partnered up with the Harkonnens to attack House Atreides. If he could do that, why not attack the Duke and his family on his homeplanet and skip the whole Dune planet scheme? Or just make up trumped up charges against the Duke and execute him after a fake trial?

[Assistant]
The whole reason for giving the Atreides the planet is to set them up for the knockdown. Atreides is a very popular house...and that makes all the other houses and the Emperor jealous and fearful. Everyone thinks Atreides is succeeding at what they are all trying to scheme into: intergalactic power consolidation. The Emperor is afraid of the popular house overthrowing him with the support of the other houses, the other houses are afraid Atreides has some secret dealings with the Emperor and who knows how many allied houses to consolidate more intergalactic power. Think crab in a bucket to the nth degree.

The emperor cant attack Atreides openly or on their homeworld as hee has to make it seem like a petty house feud, otherwise all the jealous houses feigning surprise will have no fig leaf to hide behind when Atreides is struck down and will be able to enact schemes of their own with the imperial attack on a house homeworld as justification.

Same goes for harkonen attacking the atreides homeworld.

Its schemes within schemes within schemes.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: Why do people trust journalists when they say off the record? What's stopping the journalists from printing what they talked about?

[Assistant] Nothing is stopping them from printing such things, except the potential damage to their reputation. A journalist that gets a reputation for always printing stuff that was said 'off the record', will find it very hard to get people to agree to do interview with them / tell them anything else off the record. And when interviewing people is your livelihood, that is not a good reputation to have.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User] ELI5: Why do certain toys and boardgames have an upper age limit, usually 99.

[Assistant]
For games designed for very young children, the mechanics might not be engaging for those who are older. Candy Land is great for a 3-year-old to learn colors. Not so much fun for a 12-year-old.

For those with a high limit such as 99, it's simply a lighthearted joke, as they usually say from 9 - 99. If 100-year-old gran gran wants to join in, pull up a chair for her.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[Marvel] How does Galactus eat?

Obviously he consumes planets. But how? Do we know?

Like does he just grab a planet and take a literal bite out of it?

[Assistant] He absorbs the life force of a planet. He will sometimes use an elemental converter to transform a planet into pure energy in order to make his feeding easier, but he can consume energy on his own as well.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
eli5 how does red blue and green lights in screens create a white light and all other colors?

how does this work in phones?

[Assistant]
We know how human eyes work. They have rods and cones, and the colour sensitivity is to red, green, and blue. So we built computer screens with those colours to basically stimulate those things in your eyes exactly the way we want them. It's not perfect, but it's close enough.

If we were a different species with different eyes, screens would be built differently. Thankfully animals don't watch TV or use phones.


[System] Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:

[User]
[DC Comics] Why did the Guardians switch the Green Lantern Corps to an inferior ring?

This needs some explanation, so bear with me for a moment.

The modern Green Lantern Rings are constantly draining their power, but last for over twenty-four hours. They can make nearly anything, as long as the wielder can imagine it and will it into being. They are, quite possibly, the most powerful weapons in the universe.

However, the rings they had beforehand, before Hal Jordan murdered the Corps, were far superior. Yes, they were locked into a 24-hour recharge period, but they had *infinite* power between recharge periods. They were incapable of running out. They were also capable of insane feats, such as cutting planets in half, holding them together, erasing people's memories or altering their minds, forcefully evolving/de-evolving beings, protection from *any* injury that would be lethal (provided it didn't come from a yellow source), breach dimensional barriers, and, despite longstanding belief, Hal Jordan proved that the original rings *could* affect the color yellow. But he never really managed to make it work again until the new rings explicitly lacked that weakness.

The change occurred when Kyle Rayner was handed a power ring after Hal's destruction of the Corps. Operating on its own power, it wasn't limited by the 24 hour limit, lacked the yellow weakness, but lacked the protection from mortal harm and had a finite amount of energy it could store at once. Kyle also didn't use it for many of the crazy things that the original Corps did, but that could be a lack of knowledge/initiative on his part.

So, when the Corps was reborn, why the sudden switch from the rings of the past to the less powerful, less protective rings used in the New Corps' span?

[Assistant] Quite simply, because the great Power Battery no longer holds Parallax prisoner. Before he escaped and merged with Hal Jordan, the power battery was engineered not only to provide the lanterns with energy, but also to keep Parallax contained. His will, though borne from fear, is mighty, and was able to sustain the Power Battery much more efficiently at the cost of rendering it useless against objects that reflected the yellow light of fear.