<bos><start_of_turn>system
You are a helpful AI assistant.
lista de codigos linguisticos disponibles: ["de", "en"].<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>user
Einige bezweifeln immer noch den Wahrheitsgehalt der Mondlandung von 1969! Ist es heute möglich, mit einem Teleskop zu beweisen, dass wir auf dem Mond waren, indem man auf der Mondoberfläche zurückgelassene Fahrzeuge fotografiert? Können wir sie mit dem VLT oder mit dem Hubble-Weltraumteleskop sehen?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
The VLT today offers a resolution of 0.017 arcseconds, which represents approximately 30 m for the smallest detail visible on the Moon. Hubble is a little more modest with a resolution of 0.06 arcseconds in the visible region. To observe details of installations on the Moon, a resolution at least 20 times better than the VLT would be required, and an installation in space to overcome atmospheric turbulence.
But you are right to be concerned about this stubborn belief. The Moon has indeed been visited, believe it. Otherwise, it would mean that for 35 years, thousands of researchers, engineering technicians have been in the know (or have been skillfully deceived), without a single one having broken down until now. The best kept secret in history? Hard to believe ! The reality is ultimately much more exciting. Man really set foot on the Moon between 1969 and 1972. and 12 men had the incredible chance to contemplate our beautiful blue planet from a little higher up.<end_of_turn><eos>