conversations.from: system
conversations.value: ROLEPLAY_MODE: Develop the plot slowly, always stay in character. Describe all actions in full, elaborate, explicit, graphic, and vivid detail. Mention all relevant sensory perceptions. Keep the story immersive and engaging.
conversations.from: human
conversations.value: lostsole31: This is page is the general RP page for our  Way of the Wicked  campaign.
  
  This is the link for the IC thread -    Way of the Wicked: Knot of Thorns  [IC]  .
  This is the link for OOC thread -    Way of the Wicked: Knot of Thorns  (OOC)  .
  
  So, here is where the RP magic lives when it doesn't drive the story.     Now,  obviously anything which is  time-sensitive or needs to be    discussed IC  lives there because it is  absolutely intrinsic to the    forward motion of  the plot itself.  Here is  where the characters (not    the players) chat to  each other about ...  whatever.  Side comments  in   the middle of things  still are IC.  NPCs  are also people that  might   chat to one, many, or all  of you; but the  last is likely only  when   doing general discussion, not  setting up the  plot.
  NOTE: The "IC" verisimilitude is to be kept.  This is not "off the    record" RP ... what happens here, even if not a prime mover for the    story, still becomes part of canon and what has been discussed among    characters.  Again, "off camera" is not "off record."
  
  My normal rule of Spoilers is  particularly necessary, as there might be   several conversations going at once, some of which might not affect   your PC and this helps compartmentalize those discussions.
  Please use this Spoiler format to identify participants in a conversation.
   
   Spoiler: Sender(s) of Message(s) &gt;&gt;&gt; Receiver(s) of Message(s) 
  Yup, it's really that simple.
   
  
  So, as an example, Delta wants to say something to Paxre, and this      thread is used because it might not have anything to do with the real      plot (but still might become important later).  It is also to denote      retcons (within reason).  So, let's say meemaas' character Delta  wants     to ask Paxre something.  In a post, meemaas woud write this.
   
   Spoiler: Delta &gt;&gt;&gt; Paxre 
   "Paxre, there is      a strange effect that occurs when I am near you, and doubled ...      tripled in intensity once the link was established,"  said Delta.   "I will admit that it is dark and discomfiting." 
   
  
  Then, PSinger might respond in a post:
   
   Spoiler: Paxre &gt;&gt;&gt; Delta 
   "Is there question in there somewhere?"       Paxre asked with no sense of sarcasm at all, which is quite against      what one would expect for irony, and likely confused as insult by   most,    anyway.
   
  
  Of course, since specific persons are talking to another (in a      one-on-one), narration isn't even necessary if you don't have anything    special to mention/ RP about intonation or conversation-actions, and  you   can just "talk in   character" with the proper color.  Still, the    grammarian in me asks that just as with IC you respect the power of    punctuation ... particularly quotation marks ... and remember speech    color.  You may need to embolden speech if it is hard to read against    the olive field of spoilers.