Definition: Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
Input: White People Johnson, that fucking asshole, thinking he can just go around and do all this shit. Well I'll show him. I'll go right up to him in public and stab him in the gut with a fire poker. Then, I'll tear open his stomach and begin emptying his torso of all of his organs, starting with the liver. If the cops try to stop me, I'll threaten to kill myself as I throw White People's guts at them. After I'm finished reducing 78% of his body to an empty meat sack, I'll transport his body to safe location and use his brain in a soup recipe like the fucking animal he is.    Piece of shit.

yes