Definition: Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
Input: Just as an aside, I've had, as a cyclist, drivers just straight up try to kill me.    The most obvious one was a van driver who, when we were approaching a junction, overtake me, then immediately turn the corner in front of me.     I ended up crashing into the pedestrian barrier as my least fatal option as opposed to veering directly into traffic, ramming straight into the side of the van, or breaking so hard I'd likely end up lying in the middle of a busy road.     Before you ask, it was the middle of the day.     Cycling in London is *exciting*

no