Definition: Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
Input: Yeah, Jon Stewart was reasonable about it.  Nothing beats Leno, though.  Best late night host of this generation.   He was always fair, made fun of all sides when he did anything with politics-Im pretty sure that's why he was so damn popular (not to mention he was actually naturally funny).       And then there's the fact that he seems to be one of the most genuine and nice guys out there, like he has random guys on Jay Leno's Garage all the time, one that comes to mind is a time where he saw a cool custom car at a museum, and waited in the parking lot to talk to him about it, and ended up inviting him on.

no