Definition: Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
Input: See, part of the problem with talking about Roman *and* Chinese histories is that they both had the habit of talking themselves up (everyone does this, but the Romans and Chinese were especially notorious for it) and shit-talking their enemies (again, as above), to the point where they would sometimes just flat-out make shite up.    For example, the Romans wrote that several Germanic tribes wore untanned animal skins, lived in stick-huts and didn't practice agriculture. Actual anthropology suggests that the Germanic peoples were only a little less advanced/wealthy than the Celtic peoples to the west and south, and the Celtic peoples were themselves far from the "barbarians" the Romans (and Greeks!) portrayed them as.

no