Definition: Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
Input: look up difference between communist/socialist and welfare state    > In a capitalist society with a welfare system, there is a lower bound on people's benefits. If you are sick, unemployed or old, there would be a social security to guarantee you a minimum level of existence. However, there is no upper bound on how much a person achieve.    > In socialism, there is often a lower bound, but more importantly a very strong upper bound. There is a strong compulsion to not allow anyone to get too rich, by the government controlling all methods of production.    > There is an absolute poverty and a relative poverty. If people are dying/suffering without the basic necessities [such as food, clothing, shelter] there is absolute poverty. If some are a lot rich and others not so rich, then there is relative poverty. Welfare capitalism worries primarily about absolute poverty, while socialism worries more about relative poverty. For capitalist it often doesn't matter that there is wealth inequality, because those are natural [not all gets Olympic medals, Nobel prizes, honor, awards for instance]. For a socialist, inequality is a problem.    > A capitalist nation with a welfare system is pretty much capitalism. There is no fundamental change. It is just that the government provides an additional service - an insurance against abject poverty.

no