Definition: Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
Input: >You're arguing in bad faith. Why would I need to go look for anything for you?    Because you made a false claim.  I can't look up something that doesn't exist. Get it?    >You're the one with the stupid opinion.    The tolerant left everyone.  Are you 15?  I feel like this is a teenage troll.    >Look if you can't admit you're wrong it just makes you look like a douche.    You're the one in a conservative sub making false leftist claims.      >If you had a valid point I'd listen too you.    You can't even use the word "too" properly.  It's "listen to you".     > I suppose if you were a man    Now I know you're a basement dweller.

yes