Definition: Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
Input: This is how cultural marxism works. You put every single minority first at all times no matter what. (((They))) used it to destroy Occupy Wall Street. This is why (((they))) push multikulti. (((They))) admit that (((they))) have a much easier time taking advantage of divided, heterogeneous societies rather than homogeneous societies. It is why (((they))) pushed feminism, civil rights, the homosexual agenda, etc. (((Their))) entire playbook is divide and conquer. Divide male and female, divide black and white, divide normal and abnormal. And always, always, always demand that the minority gets preferential treatment. After all, (((they))) are the permanent parasitic minority.

yes