text: the author seems to aggree with this way of voting and thinks the electoral college is worth keeping because there is a certainty of outcome and thinks that the voters in the "Swing States" should be the one to decide the election because they have more information and attention from the canidates. Is that fair?  All states should get the same amount of attention and infromation from the canidates because all of the votes are important and is the outcome ever really certain? How would we know the outcome of the election if the votes we put in all depend on a group of electors who could just pick whoever they like just because they can? How does that seem fair at all that the voters votes don't really matter and even if the canidate does get the most popular vote, the canidate still might not come out as the winner of the overall election?                       I think students should not be able to take classes at home. Because is not going to benefit them with their work. Sometimes students dont know how to do their assignment assigned. Students need to communicate with others to gain more experience.