text: The thrid reason I am against "Driveless Cars" is if an acciden occours, as if the technogly fails you would get blammed for thre accident no the manufacturer because you caused it not them. In paragraph eight the author states"Most driving laws focus on keeping drivers,passangers, and pedestrains safe, and lawmakers know that saftey is best acheved with alret drivers." Most states its illeal to test drive "computer-driver cars." If the "Drivless Cars" stoped working at an instant or if the technogly messed up and you hit someone it would be your fault. The reason it would be yoir fault is because you caused it, you hit whatver you hit. Not the manufacturer. So then again you would be paying more money to repair what you hit.