text: The presidential election is held at the electoral college i think that why would you have the electoral college when you can just vote some other way insted of having this big thing just to elect the presidant and the vice presidant why can't you just have a regular meeting deciding if you are voting for that presidant and the vice presidant the electoral college to me makes no sense why would you have this big thing that makes no sense at all if you wanted to vote for the presidant then vote i dont get why you have to go through a big system just to vote i think its just easier just to vote a regular way and it takes so long and it also depeneds on what state you are in and how you have to vote in texas if you wanted to vote for a certain person you would have to vote for the slate of 34 or what the number of that person is like for example if you voted for Jhon Kerry you would have to vote for slate of 34 democratic electors it just depends on the state. what if there was a tie the election it would be thrown into the house of representatives where the state delegations vote on the presidant and the vice presidant cause only each state casts one vote a single representatives from Wyoming representing 500,000 voters. this is why i think we should not have the electoral college becuase it causes to much cauase throught all the steps you have to go through it takes so much time up and there is so many other thing we can be focusing on i think the electral college needs to be gone and over with and we need to find other ways to vote for the presidant and the vice presidant.    Driverless cars sounds like a good idea to the normal everyday person who has to drive everywhere. But if you actually think about it, its not such a great idea. People would easily get bored and tired of it and then people would start to get fatter and more unhealthy. Also it says that driverless cars arent completely driverless. For example in the passage it mentions that the car will notify the driver when they need to take over if there is an obstical in the way. To me, if these cars cant function like a person dribing, then there is no reason at all to have them. People might as well continue driving by themselves because there is no reason to have a car that cant perform all by itself. On the other hand, driverless cars would be good for people who have disabilities or any other problems that would hinder them from driving. They could go places without needing the help of another person or having to wait for a bus to come pick them up. So my opinion is that they can make driverless cars, but dont make every car in the future driverless. There will always be people who like old fashioned things, and i feel like some people would not approve of driverless cars. So its up to the people of the world to decide whether driverless cars is a good thing and should be put out for the public, or a bad thing and should just be left alone.Dear Senator