text: In Conclusion, I would like to say that Nasa was 100 percent right when they said it was only a landform. There was three pictures taken from years 1976-2001. With the years 1976 and 1998, people absolutely believed that their was a face on our planet Mars, but by 2001, more people was convinced there was no face on Mars, but a landform like NASA have been telling them. In paragraph 7, its says there was no alien monument after all. The picture shows the Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa. A butte/mesa is landforms common around the American West. As much as people may think Mars have a face on it, we all know that it does not. the question everyone wanted to know is, Is the Face just a natural landform? It took citizens 25 years to finally say yes to the question. Even though Unmasking the Face on Mars was very disappointing, people eventually got over it.In the article "Driverless Cars Are Coming", the author presents both positive and negative aspects of driverless cars. How do i feel about driverless cars? I am against driverless cars for many reasons. First, safety will always be a huge concern, especially if the driver is not the one driving the car. In addition, the production of driverless cars would cost alot so it might come out of the tax payers money. Finaly, I believe that the driverless cars will never be completely driverless