text: To prove to all the people, a third picture was taken in 2001 by the MGS. The image was shot with the most powerful resolution. It showed the mysterious figure on Mars turned out to be a butte or mesa. These were landforms comman in the American West. With the high quality picture we now know that life on Mars never existed, and the so called "Face" was formed over time by natural landforms.                    Many people that think the face of mars was created by aliens but it was really just a landform here is why?.scientits say its just like a land formation that happens on earth this land formation are more common around american west the article says "it reminds me mist of middle butte in the snake river plain of idaho" says garvin. then garvine said "Malins team captured an extrordinary photousing the cameras absolute maximum resolution" each pixel in 2001 image spans 1.56 meters compared to 43 meters per pixel in the best 1976 viking photo in April 5,1998 (MOC) or mars orbiter camera team snapped a picture ten times shapper only for the thousands of anxious web surfers to see a natural landform on mars and not any aliens . but yet not everyone was satisfied on April '98 a cloudy time of year on the red planet the camera on boared MGS had to peer through the wispy clouds to see the face perhaps skeptis say alien markings were hidden by the haze. now many people dont talk about this topic alot any more because it has been proven that it was just a landform created by the plates moving on mars all though there are still many people who think that its not a landformation and think that it was bulit by aliens in the article it says that the land formation resembles a human face because of the shape of the head and giving the illusion of eyes, nose and mouth of the landformation experits have proven that it is just a landformation and was not bulit by any extra living beings that have lived there a longtime ago after relason the picture it was a pop icon back then it starred in hollywood films appeard in books magazines and even raio talk shows and hunted grocerys store checkout lines for 25 years.Driverless cars are an advance in technology, even though they are not fully self automatic yet .Driverless cars may not be fully driverless yet but in the future it is possible. Even if people dont like the idea of it its still going to happen. Driverless cars are not going to be any good for our generation.