text: The idea of asking multiple people for advice is prevalent today, and can decide the fate of others. An example would be a jury. A jury listens to a court case and then decides whether one is guilty, or not guilty. Listening for others thoughts allow the possibility for one person to change the opinions of everyone else. This occurred in a court case of whether a boy killed his father or not. The defendant, the boy, had a new lawyer that was not experienced, and if he lost, he would be executed. When the jury voted, all but one person voted guilty. As people wondered why the man had voted not guilty, they were able to absorb his opinion on why he voted not guilty. The man had reason, and one by one everyone in the jury decided the boy was not guilty. If the men had not listened to the other opinion, the possibility of the boy being executed would be much higher, and the better choice would not have been reached.