text: I don't think that would be fair because some kids are good in sports and they are not that good in school. Like they don't pay attention in school. Like for example i am good at sports but i cant do them because of my grades i got D' s. They should let you participate with at least D average. It only seems fair. When you cant do a sport because of your grades your letting your teammates down because you have to have a B average. Its hard to get a B because sometimes you don't get what the teacher is saying and to shy to ask question's so that brings your grades down. If are school we had to at least to get a B to de on sports or any other activities not that many people would be on the team. Most of the people that are on the sports teem or other activities most of them got C' s and D 'SDear Senator Im writing you this letter to let you know that I argue with you of keeping the Electoral College or changing to election by popular vote for the president of the United States. The founding fathers established it in the Constitution as acompromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by popular vote of quilified citizens. Your state's entitled allotment of electors equals the number of members in its Congressional delegation, one for each member in the House of Representatives plus  two for your Senators. The presidential election is held every four years on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. You help choose your state's electors when you vote for your candidate you are actually voting for your candidate's electors. The Certificate of Ascertainment also declares the winning presidential candidate in your state and shows which electors will represent your state at the meeting of the electors in December of the election year. Your state's Certificates of Ascertainments are sent to the Congress and the National Archives as part of the official records of the presidential election. At the most basic level, the electoral college is unfair to voters. Because of the winner-take-all system in each state, candidates don't spend time in states the know they have no chance of winning, focusing only on thje tight  races in the "swing" sates. During the 2000 camaign, seventeen states din't see the candidates at all, inckuding Rhode Island and South Carolina, and voters inn 25 of the largest media markets didn't get to see a single campaign ad. If anyone has a good argument for putting the fate of the presidency in the hands of a few swing voters in Ohio, they have yet to make it. The electoral College requires a presindential candidates to have trans-regional appeal. No region (South, Northeast, etc.) has enough electoral votes to elect a president. So a solid regional favorite, such as Rommey was in the South, has no incentive to campaing heavily in those states, for he gains no electoral votes by increasing his plurality in states that he knows he will win. This is a desirable result because a candidate with only regional appeal is unlikely to be a succesful president. The residents of the other regions are likely to feel disenfranchised, to feel that their votes do not count, that the new president will have no regard for their interests, that he really isn't their president.    Online shopping is never an easy task. After locating what you want to purchase within the vast sea of goods, you must decide which specific type of your desired item you would like. Different companies sell differing styles of the same item, and you may not know at first which item style will benefit your uses the most. That's the time when you ask for the opinions of real, physical people. You may wonder how many people you should ask for the inputs of. The number of opinions you receive can affect all kinds of decisions you make, not just that of what company to buy from. Seeking multiple opinions will assist you much better in your decision-making than asking a single individual will.