text: If we went driverless, it would look cool for awhile, but eventually everything would crash. The cars might not be programmed correctly, people would put the blame on the car and not themself, it would cost us a tremendous amount of more money. From the actual car itself; to all the problems it would cause. We would need to change all the roads and enable electrical cables. Requiring "massive upgardes to existing roads, something that is simply to expensive to be practical." The article states. If the google cars aren't truely driverless, people have to be alert in case of complicated traffic issues. Do you honestly think people would pay attention? Or will it become such a habit and easy to just sleep on the way to work at least one time. Should we take a risk to look cool and "change the world?" Or is it possible to improve technology in a differnet way that keeps drivers, passengers, and pedestrians safe and happy.I do not beleive that the author justifies their statement of "Venus has value" in paragraph 8. The author does not explain the pros of exploring Venus as well as they explain the cons of why we should explore Venus. Why do I think this? Well the autor describes the deadly, hot and thick atmosphere of Venus, stating that the reason exploring Venus is worth the risk is because "Venus still has some features that are analigous to those on Earth." Well, does that justify spending millions or hundreds of millions of dollars on a rover or a spacecraft to explore it? I don't beleive so.