text: The author's insight on silicon carbide supports his idea that Venus is a worthy pursut despite the dangers. Simplified elecotronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in chambers. The authors explains it by stating, "...stimulating the chaos oof Venus's surface and have lasted weeks in such conditions" (Paragraph 7). He does not support this idea throughly, giving limited information to convice the reader of his claim. He only says it can last in challenging conditions for a limired amount of time, but does not mention any support, leaving silicon carbide as his weakest support on how using that, can convice people that Venus is a worthy pursit depsite the dangers it possesses. He uses only one fact, but not not give enough anaylsis to make his argument strong or very clear.