After John wrote the abstract "以原位乳液聚合制得的聚丙烯酸丁酯PBA/TiO2复合胶乳为整理剂,通过浸轧对棉织物进行功能整理,并与经TiO2水分散液、PBA胶乳与TiO2分散液共混物、黏合剂VTECO与TiO2分散液共混物等3种不同整理剂整理的棉织物进行功效和服用性能比较.结果发现,在相同的整理工艺下,经自制PBA/TiO2复合胶乳整理的棉织物表面TiO2粒子尺寸较小,分散较好,织物表面附着层较薄、较均匀,纱线内纤维间黏连较少,因而经相应整理的棉织物具有较好的抗紫外线和抗老化性能,且对棉织物原有的白度、手感等服用性能影响较小,这与PBA/TiO2复合胶乳整理本质上实现的是对纱线内单纤维的均匀薄型包覆有关.", he wrote these keywords "纤维, 胶乳, 分散". Do you think his choice of keywords was correct? Answer yes or no.
no