what was this court case about?
It is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that outlined the basic structure doctrine of the Constitution.
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that outlined the basic structure doctrine of the Constitution. 
state the fourth point of the fundamental rights of the indian constitution UNANSWERABLE which amendments were made to the principles? Article 21-A, into the Constitution, seeks to provide free and compulsory education to all children aged 6 to 14 years, welfare schemes for the weaker sections are being implemented both by Central and State governments, provision of free textbooks to students belonging to scheduled castes or tribes, several Land Reforms Acts were enacted to provide ownership rights etc. how many schedules are there in the constitution? UNANSWERABLE which are the sources of power for the government? The executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government receive their power from the constitution and are bound by it. are there any limitations to it? In "Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala", the Supreme Court ruled that an amendment cannot destroy what it seeks to modify; it cannot tinker with the constitution's basic structure or framework, which are immutable.
wiki:21522211
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala [SEP] Introduction
"Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Anr." (Writ Petition (Civil) 135 of 1970), also known as the Kesavananda Bharati judgement, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that outlined the basic structure doctrine of the Constitution. Justice Hans Raj Khanna asserted through the Basic Structure doctrine that the constitution possesses a basic structure of constitutional principles and values. The Court partially cemented the prior precedent "Golaknath v. State of Punjab", which held that constitutional amendments through Article 368 were subject to fundamental rights review, but only if they could affect the 'basic structure of the Constitution.' At the same time, the Court also upheld the constitutionality of the first provision of Article 31-C, which implied that amendments seeking to implement the Directive Principles, which do not affect the 'Basic Structure,' shall not be subjected to judicial review.