was it used judicially?
Yes. Federal judges, when interpreting the Constitution, frequently use "The Federalist Papers" as a contemporary account of the intentions of the framers and ratifiers
The Federalist Papers
Federal judges, when interpreting the Constitution, frequently use "The Federalist Papers" as a contemporary account of the intentions of the framers and ratifiers. 
the third amendment to the us constitution has to do with Placeing restrictions on the quartering of soldiers in private homes without the owner's consent, forbidding the practice in peacetime why was this amendment passed? In response to Anti-Federalist objections to the new Constitution how is it seen culturally? It has been used for comedic purposes was it adopted by any other country? UNANSWERABLE when was it passed? March 1, 1792 and who introduced it? James Madison did he have any role in the abolition of slavery? No. He viewed the institution as a necessary part of the Southern economy, though he was troubled by the instability of a society that depended on a large enslaved population did he start any political party? UNANSWERABLE what was his educational status? His studied Latin, Greek, theology and the works of the Enlightenment at the College of New Jersey what kind of study is the last one? UNANSWERABLE had he been a minister to france? UNANSWERABLE how is madison known as? Father of the Constitution what were his other professions? American statesman, diplomat, expansionist, philosopher had he written any work? Yes. The Federalist Papers what is the work about? It is a collection of 85 articles and essays to promote the ratification of the United States Constitution
wiki:11584816
The Federalist Papers [SEP] Judicial use
Federal judges, when interpreting the Constitution, frequently use "The Federalist Papers" as a contemporary account of the intentions of the framers and ratifiers. They have been applied on issues ranging from the power of the federal government in foreign affairs (in "Hines v. Davidowitz") to the validity of ex post facto laws (in the 1798 decision "Calder v. Bull", apparently the first decision to mention "The Federalist"). , "The Federalist" had been quoted 291 times in Supreme Court decisions. The amount of deference that should be given to "The Federalist Papers" in constitutional interpretation has always been somewhat controversial. As early as 1819, Chief Justice John Marshall noted in the famous case "McCulloch v.