who were the parties involved in the case?
The plaintiff, Helen Palsgraf and the railroad.
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co.
The plaintiff, Helen Palsgraf, was waiting at a Long Island Rail Road station in August 1924 while taking her daughters to the beach. Two men attempted to board the train before hers; one (aided by railroad employees) dropped a package that exploded, causing a large coin-operated scale on the platform to hit her. After the incident, she began to stammer, and subsequently sued the railroad,
what is palsgraf v. long island railroad co.? Leading case in American tort law. what does that law mean? Addresses torts in United States law. what is torts? A civil wrong that causes a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in legal liability for the person who commits the tortious act. where did it get its name from? A distinctive body of law arose in the common law word traced to English tort law. what kind of reforms are done in it? Some calls for reform stress the difficulties encountered by potential claimants. what is business related issue in it? Tortious interference with trade, fraud, injurious falsehood, and negligent misrepresentation. in what way did it get its influence from english? Right of victims to receive redress was regarded by later English scholars as one of the rights of Englishmen. when was the first hearing of the aforementioned case? 1928
wiki:17792951
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. [SEP] Introduction
The original jury verdict was overturned, and the railroad won the case. A number of factors, including the bizarre facts and Cardozo's outstanding reputation, made the case prominent in the legal profession, and it remains so, taught to most if not all American law students in torts class. Cardozo's conception, that tort liability can only occur when a defendant breaches a duty of care the defendant owes to a plaintiff, causing the injury sued for, has been widely accepted in American law. In dealing with proximate cause, many states have taken the approach championed by the Court of Appeals' dissenter in "Palsgraf", Judge William S.