what was the reaction of the people?
Newspapers stressed different aspects of "Bakke", often reflecting their political ideology. The conservative "Chicago Sun-Times" bannered Bakke's admission in its headline, while noting that the court had permitted affirmative action under some circumstances.
Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke
Newspapers stressed different aspects of "Bakke", often reflecting their political ideology. The conservative "Chicago Sun-Times" bannered Bakke's admission in its headline, while noting that the court had permitted affirmative action under some circumstances.
on what basis did alan bakke challenge affirmative action in 1978 After twice being rejected by the University of California, Davis, he brought suit in state court challenging the constitutionality of the school's affirmative action program. what is regents of the univ. of cal. v. bakke? was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. It upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy. who filed the law suit against the university? Allan P. Bakke who was he? He is a white male who applied to twelve medical schools in 1973. why did he file the law suit? He was in his early 30s while applying, and therefore considered too old by at least two institutions. After being rejected twice by the University of California, he filed the law suit. what was the opinion of the lower courts? The court barred the university from using race in the admissions process and ordered it to provide evidence that Bakke would not have been admitted under a race-neutral program.
wiki:5306530
Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke [SEP] Reaction
Newspapers stressed different aspects of "Bakke", often reflecting their political ideology. The conservative "Chicago Sun-Times" bannered Bakke's admission in its headline, while noting that the court had permitted affirmative action under some circumstances. "The Washington Post", a liberal newspaper, began its headline in larger-than-normal type, "Affirmative Action Upheld" before going on to note that the court had admitted Bakke and curbed quotas. "The Wall Street Journal", in a headline, deemed "Bakke" "The Decision Everybody Won". According to Oxford University Chair of Jurisprudence Ronald Dworkin, the court's decision "was received by the press and much of the public with great relief, as an act of judicial statesmanship that gave to each party in the national debate what it seemed to want most".