was the decision unanimous?
Yes, the bench gave eleven separate judgments, which agreed on some points and differed on others.
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
 The bench gave eleven separate judgments, which agreed on some points and differed on others. 
state the fourth point of the fundamental rights of the indian constitution UNANSWERABLE which amendments were made to the principles? Article 21-A, into the Constitution, seeks to provide free and compulsory education to all children aged 6 to 14 years, welfare schemes for the weaker sections are being implemented both by Central and State governments, provision of free textbooks to students belonging to scheduled castes or tribes, several Land Reforms Acts were enacted to provide ownership rights etc. how many schedules are there in the constitution? UNANSWERABLE which are the sources of power for the government? The executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government receive their power from the constitution and are bound by it. are there any limitations to it? In "Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala", the Supreme Court ruled that an amendment cannot destroy what it seeks to modify; it cannot tinker with the constitution's basic structure or framework, which are immutable. what was this court case about? It is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that outlined the basic structure doctrine of the Constitution.
wiki:21522214
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala [SEP] Judgment
The Supreme Court reviewed the decision in "Golaknath v. State of Punjab", and considered the validity of the 24th, 25th, 26th and 29th amendments. The case was heard by the largest ever Constitution Bench of 13 Judges. The bench gave eleven separate judgments, which agreed on some points and differed on others. Nanabhoy Palkhivala, assisted by Fali Nariman and Soli Sorabjee, presented the case against the government in both cases.