what was powell's opinion in this case?
Upon discussing the scope of Title VI, he opined that it barred only those racial classifications forbidden by the Constitution.
Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke
Justice Powell, after setting forth the facts of the case, discussed and found it unnecessary to decide whether Bakke had a private right of action under Title VI, assuming that was so for purposes of the case. He then discussed the scope of Title VI, opining that it barred only those racial classifications forbidden by the Constitution.
the central issue in the regents of the university of california v. bakke case was Allan P. Bakke sought admission to medical school, but was rejected for admission due in part to his age. Bakke was in his early 30s while applying, and therefore considered too old by at least two institutions. After twice being rejected by the University of California, Davis, he brought suit in state court challenging the constitutionality of the school's affirmative action program. after whose name is the name of this university? UNANSWERABLE who is the first mentioned person in your earlier answer? An engineer and former Marine officer.
wiki:5306523
Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke [SEP] Powell's opinion
Justice Powell, after setting forth the facts of the case, discussed and found it unnecessary to decide whether Bakke had a private right of action under Title VI, assuming that was so for purposes of the case. He then discussed the scope of Title VI, opining that it barred only those racial classifications forbidden by the Constitution. Turning to the program itself, Powell determined that it was not simply a goal, as the university had contended, but a racial qualification—assuming that UC Davis could find sixteen minimally qualified minority students, there were only 84 seats in the freshman class open to white students, whereas minorities could compete for any spot in the 100-member class.