what was the appeal made at the start?
LIRR argued that the verdict had been contrary to the law and the evidence an Palsgraf argued that the jury verdict finding negligence was supported by undisputed facts, and should not be questioned by the appellate courts.
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co.
In its briefs before the Appellate Division, the LIRR argued that the verdict had been contrary to the law and the evidence. It stressed that it had no foreknowledge that the package was dangerous, and that no law required it to search the contents of passenger luggage. The brief stated that given this, there was no negligence in helping a man make a train, and even if there was, that negligence was not the proximate cause of Palsgraf's injuries. Wood, for Palsgraf, argued that the jury verdict finding negligence was supported by undisputed facts, and should not be questioned by the appellate courts. 
what is palsgraf v. long island railroad co.? Leading case in American tort law. what does that law mean? Addresses torts in United States law. what is torts? A civil wrong that causes a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in legal liability for the person who commits the tortious act. where did it get its name from? A distinctive body of law arose in the common law word traced to English tort law. what kind of reforms are done in it? Some calls for reform stress the difficulties encountered by potential claimants. what is business related issue in it? Tortious interference with trade, fraud, injurious falsehood, and negligent misrepresentation. in what way did it get its influence from english? Right of victims to receive redress was regarded by later English scholars as one of the rights of Englishmen. when was the first hearing of the aforementioned case? 1928 who were the parties involved in the case? The plaintiff, Helen Palsgraf and the railroad. who was the plaintiff in the case? Helen Palsgraf what was the claim of the plaintiff against the other party? Its employees had been negligent while assisting the man, and that she had been harmed by the neglect. who was the judge in it? Benjamin Cardozo
wiki:17792965
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. [SEP] Initial appeal
Albert H. F. Seeger wrote the majority opinion for the five justices hearing the case, and was joined by Justices William F. Hagarty and William B. Carswell. Seeger had been born in Stuttgart and came to the United States as a child; he had been elected to the Supreme Court in 1917 and was elevated to the Appellate Division by Governor Al Smith in 1926. Aged 68 at the time of "Palsgraf", he could serve only two more years before mandatory retirement. Justice Seeger ruled that the finding of negligence by the jury was supported by the evidence, and speculated that the jury might have found that helping a passenger board a moving train was a negligent act.