how was the novel approached by the reviewers?
It received mostly positive reviews - author Stephen King stated in "The New York Times" that it was "every bit as good as Potters 1 through 3".
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
"Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" has received mostly positive reviews. In "The New York Times" Book Review, author Stephen King stated the "Goblet of Fire" was "every bit as good as Potters 1 through 3" and praised the humour and subplots, although he commented that "there's also a moderately tiresome amount of adolescent squabbling...it's a teenage thing".
harry potter and the goblet of fire trials UNANSWERABLE is this a film or a television series? Neither - it is a fantasy book. who is the writer of this book? J. K. Rowling where did she get her inspirations from? In 1990, while she was on a four-hour-delayed train trip from Manchester to London, the idea for a story of a young boy attending a school of wizardry "came fully formed" into her mind. has she written any other books apart from the former one? Yes, "The Casual Vacancy", "The Ickabog" is the former harry potter story a part of a book written by the writer? Yes, it is the fourth novel in the "Harry Potter" series. and when did it first publish? 8 July 2000 what kind of themes can be seen in this novel? Bigotry what is the novel about? It follows Harry Potter, a wizard in his fourth year at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, and the mystery surrounding the entry of Harry's name into the Triwizard Tournament, in which he is forced to compete. is harry a real wizard? He is a fictional character who, on his eleventh birthday, learns he is a wizard can you name some other characters from that novel? Albus Dumbledore, Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger. where did the novel first launch? United Kingdom
wiki:19887556
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire [SEP] Critical reception
For "The Horn Book Magazine", Martha V. Parravano gave a mixed review, saying "some will find [it] wide-ranging, compellingly written, and absorbing; others, long, rambling, and tortuously fraught with adverbs". A "Publishers Weekly" review praised the book's "red herrings, the artful clues and tricky surprises that disarm the most attentive audience" and saying it "might be her most thrilling yet." Writing for "The New Yorker", Joan Acocella noted that "where the prior volumes moved like lightning, here the pace is slower, the energy more dispersed. At the same time, the tone becomes more grim." Kristin Lemmerman of CNN said that it is not great literature: 'Her prose has more in common with your typical beach-blanket fare and the beginning contained too much recap to introduce characters to new readers, although Rowling quickly gets back on track, introducing readers to a host of well-drawn new characters.' Writing for Salon.com, Charles Taylor was generally positive about the change of mood and development of characters.