what is the style of writing used?
It was dry and avoided the narrow style of the historical novel and the cosmic progression.
On the Origin of Species
While the book was readable enough to sell, its dryness ensured that it was seen as aimed at specialist scientists and could not be dismissed as mere journalism or imaginative fiction. Unlike the still-popular "Vestiges", it avoided the narrative style of the historical novel and cosmological speculation, though the closing sentence clearly hinted at cosmic progression. 
why is incomplete dominance not evidence for the blending theory of inheritance UNANSWERABLE what is pangenesis theory? According to this theory  each part of the parent's body emitted tiny particles called gemmules, which migrated through the body to contribute to that parent's gametes, their eggs or sperms. who came up with this theory? Charles Darwin. who was he? An English naturalist, geologist and biologist, best known for his contributions to the science of evolution. where was he from? Shrewsbury, Shropshire. when was he born? 12 February 1809. who did he marry? Emma Wedgwood. did he write any books? "On the Origin of the Species", "Journal and Remarks" , and "The Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs" what is the first mentioned book about? The book presented a body of evidence that the diversity of life arose by common descent through a branching pattern of evolution. when was it published? 24 November 1859.
wiki:19648684
On the Origin of Species [SEP] Literary style
Darwin had long been immersed in the literary forms and practices of specialist science, and made effective use of his skills in structuring arguments. David Quammen has described the book as written in everyday language for a wide audience, but noted that Darwin's literary style was uneven: in some places he used convoluted sentences that are difficult to read, while in other places his writing was beautiful. Quammen advised that later editions were weakened by Darwin making concessions and adding details to address his critics, and recommended the first edition. James T. Costa said that because the book was an abstract produced in haste in response to Wallace's essay, it was more approachable than the big book on natural selection Darwin had been working on, which would have been encumbered by scholarly footnotes and much more technical detail.