review of novel harry potter and the deathly hallows
"The Baltimore Sun" critic, Mary Carole McCauley, noted that the book was more serious than the previous novels in the series and had more straightforward prose.
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows
"The Baltimore Sun" critic, Mary Carole McCauley, noted that the book was more serious than the previous novels in the series and had more straightforward prose. 
wiki:17771731
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows [SEP] Critical response
"The Baltimore Sun" critic, Mary Carole McCauley, noted that the book was more serious than the previous novels in the series and had more straightforward prose. Furthermore, reviewer Alice Fordham from "The Times" wrote that "Rowling's genius is not just her total realisation of a fantasy world, but the quieter skill of creating characters that bounce off the page, real and flawed and brave and lovable". Fordham concluded, "We have been a long way together, and neither Rowling nor Harry let us down in the end". "The New York Times" writer Michiko Kakutani agreed, praising Rowling's ability to make Harry both a hero and a character that can be related to.