how was its critical response ?
The Evidence is: Reviewing the film for "Variety", Owen Gleiberman called it "a textbook case of a comic-book film that's unexciting in its ho-hum competence, and even its visual-effects bravura". He criticized Hardy's performance as acting like "a stumblebum Method goof", and felt the film spent too long on Venom's origin story when it should have been what a sequel likely will be.
Venom (2018 film)
Reviewing the film for "Variety", Owen Gleiberman called it "a textbook case of a comic-book film that's unexciting in its ho-hum competence, and even its visual-effects bravura". He criticized Hardy's performance as acting like "a stumblebum Method goof", and felt the film spent too long on Venom's origin story when it should have been what a sequel likely will be.
who does the voice for venom in the movie Tom Hardy when was this movie released ? 2018 who directed it ? Ruben Fleischer was it cancelled before ? Yes, apart from other reason, the studio chose to seek out new writers for a different approach from that draft. Sony was also not yet convinced that Grace could serve as the lead actor in the film.
wiki:17109781
Venom (2018 film) [SEP] Critical response
Anderson also said that Hardy was "usually excellent (but not this time)", and called the action sequences "generic". At the "Toronto Star", Peter Howell gave "Venom" two out of four stars and said that Hardy's performance prevented it from being "an unwatchable disaster", but he still thought the film was a mess with an inconsistent tone, "bog-level computer effects and washed-out colours resembling those of a 1998 sci-fi movie on a VHS tape that's been left out in the sun". Jake Coyle for the "Associated Press" found the film to be "kind of a hoot" despite it being "an incoherent mess of tones, acting styles and visual effects".