is there any scope for reviewing the judiciary as per the constitution?
Yes, it  was adopted by the constitution of India from judicial review in the United States.
Constitution of India
was adopted by the constitution of India from judicial review in the United States.
state the fourth point of the fundamental rights of the indian constitution UNANSWERABLE which amendments were made to the principles? Article 21-A, into the Constitution, seeks to provide free and compulsory education to all children aged 6 to 14 years, welfare schemes for the weaker sections are being implemented both by Central and State governments, provision of free textbooks to students belonging to scheduled castes or tribes, several Land Reforms Acts were enacted to provide ownership rights etc. how many schedules are there in the constitution? UNANSWERABLE which are the sources of power for the government? The executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government receive their power from the constitution and are bound by it. are there any limitations to it? In "Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala", the Supreme Court ruled that an amendment cannot destroy what it seeks to modify; it cannot tinker with the constitution's basic structure or framework, which are immutable. what was this court case about? It is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that outlined the basic structure doctrine of the Constitution. was the decision unanimous? Yes, the bench gave eleven separate judgments, which agreed on some points and differed on others. who were the members of the bench? CJI S M Sikri, Shelat and Grover JJ, Hegde, Mukherjea JJ, Justice Hans Raj Khanna etc
wiki:12145322
Constitution of India [SEP] Judicial review
Judicial review was adopted by the constitution of India from judicial review in the United States. In the Indian constitution, judicial review is dealt with in . The constitution is the supreme power of the nation, and governs all laws. According to Article 13: Due to the adoption of the Thirty-eighth Amendment, the Supreme Court was not allowed to preside over any laws adopted during a state of emergency which infringe fundamental rights under article 32 (the right to constitutional remedies). The Forty-second Amendment widened Article 31C and added Articles 368(4) and 368(5), stating that any law passed by Parliament could not be challenged in court.