is there any controversies related to it?
Controversy erupted in over a proposed commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Japan.
National Air and Space Museum
Controversy erupted in March 1994 over a proposed commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Japan. 
short note on international finance corporation (ifc) The International Finance Corporation (IFC) is an international financial institution that offers investment, advisory, and asset-management services to encourage private-sector development in less developed countries. where is it headquartered? Washington, D.C. when was it established? 1956 which are its investment services? In the area of private-sector development where is the above mentioned place located? United States of America how is the climate in the above city? Washington is in the northern part of the humid subtropical climate zone with chilly winters and light snow and hot and humid summers which things contribute to the city's economy? Federal governmental agency, Tourism is there any famous museum at this place? Yes, National Museum of Natural History, National Air and Space Museum; the National Museum of African Art when was the second one founded? August 12, 1946
wiki:19524921
National Air and Space Museum [SEP] Controversies
Controversy erupted in March 1994 over a proposed commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Japan. The centerpiece of the exhibit was the "Enola Gay", the B-29 bomber that dropped Little Boy on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. When the first draft of the script for the exhibit was leaked by 'Air Force Magazine, the responses were very critical. Two sentences described as infamous that sparked controversy were, "For most Americans, this war was fundamentally different than the one waged against Germany and Italy - it was a war of vengeance. For most Japanese, it was a war to defend their unique culture against western imperialism." Veterans' groups, led by the Air Force Association and The Retired Officers Association, argued strongly that the exhibit's inclusion of Japanese accounts and photographs of victims politicized the exhibit and insulted U.S.