who were the members of the bench?
CJI S M Sikri, Shelat and Grover JJ, Hegde, Mukherjea JJ, Justice Hans Raj Khanna etc
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
CJI S M Sikri 
state the fourth point of the fundamental rights of the indian constitution UNANSWERABLE which amendments were made to the principles? Article 21-A, into the Constitution, seeks to provide free and compulsory education to all children aged 6 to 14 years, welfare schemes for the weaker sections are being implemented both by Central and State governments, provision of free textbooks to students belonging to scheduled castes or tribes, several Land Reforms Acts were enacted to provide ownership rights etc. how many schedules are there in the constitution? UNANSWERABLE which are the sources of power for the government? The executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government receive their power from the constitution and are bound by it. are there any limitations to it? In "Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala", the Supreme Court ruled that an amendment cannot destroy what it seeks to modify; it cannot tinker with the constitution's basic structure or framework, which are immutable. what was this court case about? It is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that outlined the basic structure doctrine of the Constitution. was the decision unanimous? Yes, the bench gave eleven separate judgments, which agreed on some points and differed on others.
wiki:21522217
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala [SEP] S.M. Sikri, Chief Justice
CJI S M Sikri held that the fundamental importance of the freedom of the individual has to be preserved for all times to come and that it could not be amended out of existence. According to the Chief Justice, fundamental rights conferred by Part III of the Constitution of India cannot be abrogated, though a reasonable abridgment of those rights could be effected in public interest. There is a limitation on the power of amendment by necessary implication which was apparent from a reading of the preamble and therefore, according to the learned Chief Justice, the expression 'amendment of this Constitution,' in Article 368, means any addition or change in any of the provisions of the Constitution within the broad contours of the preamble, made in order to carry out the basic objectives of the Constitution.