who was the plaintiff in the case?
Helen Palsgraf
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co.
The plaintiff, Helen Palsgraf, 
what is palsgraf v. long island railroad co.? Leading case in American tort law. what does that law mean? Addresses torts in United States law. what is torts? A civil wrong that causes a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in legal liability for the person who commits the tortious act. where did it get its name from? A distinctive body of law arose in the common law word traced to English tort law. what kind of reforms are done in it? Some calls for reform stress the difficulties encountered by potential claimants. what is business related issue in it? Tortious interference with trade, fraud, injurious falsehood, and negligent misrepresentation. in what way did it get its influence from english? Right of victims to receive redress was regarded by later English scholars as one of the rights of Englishmen. when was the first hearing of the aforementioned case? 1928 who were the parties involved in the case? The plaintiff, Helen Palsgraf and the railroad.
wiki:17792949
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. [SEP] Introduction
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99 (1928), is a leading case in American tort law on the question of liability to an unforeseeable plaintiff. The case was heard by the New York Court of Appeals, the highest state court in New York; its opinion was written by Chief Judge Benjamin Cardozo, a leading figure in the development of American common law and later a United States Supreme Court justice. The plaintiff, Helen Palsgraf, was waiting at a Long Island Rail Road station in August 1924 while taking her daughters to the beach. Two men attempted to board the train before hers; one (aided by railroad employees) dropped a package that exploded, causing a large coin-operated scale on the platform to hit her.