what is the controversy regarding this?
A rethinking of the habitats assessment might be necessary in the light of a new climate law as part of the EU Green Deal. There maybe some possible future incompatibilities of the Natura 2000 habitats-test with novel EU Green Infrastructure policies.
Natura 2000
The Natura 2000 legislation, notably with its habitats-test (or: habitats assessment, Article 6 of the Habitats Directive), dates back to the days climate change was not an issue and the concept of ecosystem services had not been well developed. Hence, in international law literature Kistenkas raised the question the habitats assessment was originally not designed for striking a balance of all relevant ecosystem services or to involve climate change into the assessment. Although well protecting nature conservation objectives, a rethinking of the habitats assessment might be necessary in the light of a new climate law as part of e.g. the EU Green Deal.

In European law literature Borgstrom and Kistenkas have discussed some possible future incompatibilities of the Natura 2000 habitats-test with novel EU Green Infrastructure policies.

what is sathyamangalam wildlife sanctuary? A protected area and tiger reserve what is the definition of this first type of area? Protected areas or conservation areas are locations which receive protection because of their recognized natural, ecological or cultural values. what is its effectiveness? To prevent the ongoing loss of biodiversity. what are some challenges it faces? The local population, specific ecosystems or the design of the reserve itself, unpredictable elements in ecology issues what are some protected places in european union? Natura 2000 areas in the European Union what is the current status of this above mentioned 2000 area? It protects 27,312 sites with terrestrial area of 787,606 km and marine area of 360,350 km
wiki:8255045
Natura 2000 [SEP] Controversy
The Natura 2000 legislation, notably with its habitats-test (or: habitats assessment, Article 6 of the Habitats Directive), dates back to the days climate change was not an issue and the concept of ecosystem services had not been well developed. Hence, in international law literature Kistenkas raised the question the habitats assessment was originally not designed for striking a balance of all relevant ecosystem services or to involve climate change into the assessment. Although well protecting nature conservation objectives, a rethinking of the habitats assessment might be necessary in the light of a new climate law as part of e.g. the EU Green Deal.