text:
Posts Tagged 'American Constitution'
Black Activists Plan Blacks-Only Town 'Wakanda' in Georgia
This comes via the Midwestly channel on YouTube. Midwestly is a White guy and his views seem to be Conservative. He's posted criticisms of Black Lives Matter and the riots that have broken out in its name. But he also says that there's nothing wrong in this, and gives them his support. He just feels that it's not the way to bring people together, and that it creates division. He also makes the point that if it was done by Whites, it would be considered Alt Right.
Yes, yes, it would. and there is plenty wrong with a town founded deliberately to exclude or marginalise people simply because of their race or ethnicity.
Ashley Scott, Renee Walters, and the Foundation of the new 'Wakanda'
According to the Insider, two Black Activists, Ashley Scott, a real estate agent from Stonecrest, Georgia, and her friend Renee Walters found 96.71 acres of land in Georgia. They then persuaded 19 Black families to purchase the land with the intention of setting up a town. Called 'Wakanda', presumably after the fictional African supertechnological state in the movie and comic Black Panther, it will be primarily for Blacks, although pro-Black White allies will be permitted to apply. One of the points Midwestly makes is that Georgia doesn't have the fictional element Vibranium upon which Wakanda's advanced technology is based. And so it ain't gonna be Wakanda without the Vibranium.
Scott said that the year had made her feel distraught and was looking for ways to feel empowered. She also said that she envisioned 'a place where we can all be proud and have human dignity, honour and respect, and equality amongst our Black people because we have Black talent.'
The Freedom Georgia Initiative
This produced the Freedom Georgia Initiative, which will spend the next three to five years installing everything from wi-fi and water before planning residential, retail and recreation areas. MidWestly makes the point that the amount of land purchased gives each family about five acres, which isn't a lot, plus retail, plus recreation and plus public works. He also says it doesn't sound like freedom.
Scott wrote an article for Blavity stating that the group saw the land as a fresh start with a city that could be a shining example of being the change they wanted to see by supporting Black families and companies. She said that they wanted to be involved in creating the lives they really want for their Black families. And maybe, just maybe, create some generational wealth for ourselves by investing in the land and their core values and beliefs. The intiative is, apparently, geared to offering a Black centric community a fresh start after the fall of Tulsa's Black Wall Street by White supremacists and poverty enforced by Jim Crow laws.
Scott said that 'it's not even a Black thing. It's a place where we can all be proud and have human dignity, honour and respect, and equality amongst our Black people because we have Black talent.' Walter told Insider that despite major figures calling for change and speaking out in favour of Black America in recent months, the two hope the project can be an example to those that advocating for significant change can begin on an individual level.' He comments that it's cool they want to get out of the city, but that it sounds like they want segregation. Well, that's the way it sounds to me!
Practical Problems
He goes on to read from a second article, which says that the planned colony is in Wilkinson County in rural Georgia, and that the group initially looked into Toomsboro, Georgia, until they were told that it wasn't for sale. This second article calls it a 'Black only safe haven called 'Freedom'.' But it also adds that pro-Black families can apply to live there. Midwestly asks what 'pro-Black' means. They also intend to clear the land for farming and fishing. He states that they don't have nearly enough land for what they intend to do. Even if the 19 families only have one acre plots each, leaving 50 acres for building a lake, retail stores, it would mean that everyone would have to move into condos to make it work. He said that if it was him, he would want to have land with his home, because without land you aren't going to create wealth.
Segregation and the Alt-Right
Midwestly says he wishes them all the best because they're private citizens buying land to do what they want. It's just that if White people did this, it would be called something different, like an ethnostate. Yes, because that's what it very much looks like from here, the intended ethnicity of the settlement notwithstanding. He goes on to say that it's what the Alt Right is talking about, and he doesn't necessarily like all that division, after the University of Michingan launched its Whites and non-Whites separate cafes. This isn't the way to create unity. It just creates more division. And ultimately it's heartbreaking to see people talking about this stuff as if it's stunning and brave.
Conservatives, Race and Property Rights
Midwestly is coming at this from the Conservative view that the private individual should be able to do whatever they like on their own land. This is, apparently, the reason Barry Goldwater opposed desegegration. He was not an opponent of Black improvement. I have seen it argued that he was a member of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. He also, supposedly, desegegrated his department store. But he thought that compulsory desegegration was an attack on individual freedom and property rights. But Midwestly is clearly troubled by the racism at the heart of this project.
Ideal Communities an American Tradition
In some ways, the project part of a long tradition of people trying to found better, more perfect communities in the New World. It was behind the Pilgrim Father's decision to migrate, as was explained in this Sunday's edition of the Beeb's Christian programme, Songs of Praise. They intended their new settlement to be a shining beacon. It was the Puritan settlers who gave America its vision of itself as a uniquely more community, a shining city on a hill. It saw British nonconformists take to America ideas of democracy and religious tolerance which influenced the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. It should be pointed out, however, that the Founding Fathers determinedly weren't democrats, and explicitly stated that the franchise should be restricted to elite White males to stop the poor majority oppressing the rich.
In the 19th century political radicals like the British poet Robert Southey, the Scots Utopian Socialist Robert Owen, and the followers of the French Utopian Socialist Fourier all tried to set up their own Utopian Communes in the US. These failed, though the Oneida community survived by reforming itself as a joint-stock company. A Jewish emigrant to the US also hoped to found a Jewish state there. I think this was originally going to be in the region of Niagara in New York State. And then there's Utah, which founded by the Mormons as a theocracy for their faith before it joined the US.
Free Black Villages in the British Caribbean
In the Caribbean, radical Baptist missionaries founded free Black townships with like Sligoville, New Birmingham, Piedmont, Hoby Town, named after the British abolitionist Dr. Hoby, Unity, Refuge, which was originally named Wilberforce after the great British abolitionist, Kettering and Granville, named after another British abolitionist, Granville Sharpe, Buxton and Victoria. The radical Baptist missionary William Knibb estimated in 1840 that there were about 200 free villages with 8,000 inhabitants between them spread about Jamaica. Free Black towns were also established in Demerara and Berbice, now part of Guyana, starting with Northbrook Estate and then Den Amstel. They were also set up in Antigua. By 1842 they numbered 27 such villages with a total population of 3,600.
These villages were set up to protect Black people from re-enslavement by the planters. I don't know if there were free Black communities established by abolitionists in the 19th century. But America's Black community, while depressed and impoverished, is not enslaved. That came to an end with the Civil War. Nor do they have official implemented, state-sanctioned segregation. That came to an end in the late '60s when Lyndon Johnson passed the Civil Rights Act. The Black community is, generally speaking, deprived and disadvantaged. But it is not enslaved, nor legally subject to discrimination. At least, not overtly. Blacks have voting rights, and there are Black politicians and members of the judiciary and legal profession. Since at least the 1980s, various affirmative action legislation has been passed with the deliberate intention of giving Blacks greater opportunities, freedom and prosperity and giving them genuine social and economic equality with mainstream America.
Nation of Islam, American Black Nationalism and White European Communes and Colonies
The proposed establishment of this town seems more like the separatism of the Nation of Islam. This demands the creation of an independent Black nation made out of five of the states of the southern US. Elsewhere in the world, it recalls Liberia, which was founded by American abolitionists as a country for freed American slaves, just as Britain attempted to do the same with Sierra Leone in the late 18th century.
And yes, it also resembles the communes proposed by White supremacists and Nazis, like those in the Hayden Lakes area of the American Midwest. Nietzsche's cousin, Elizabeth Forster-Nietzsche, was a proto-Nazi. She tried to found a perfect community of racially pure Germans in South America. But rather than finding prosperity, the community instead became poor and inbred. Over on this side of the Atlantic, there was also a move by two White British Nazis to buy a farm in France to build a pure, White colony there. This was passionately attacked by British anti-Nazis. Hope Not Hate have published an article about it, and it seems that after all these long years it's come to nothing. Except that the Nazis behind it seemed to have spent their time trying to kill each other.
Return to the Ghetto
A few years ago in the 1990s or thereabouts there was talk about a 'return to the ghetto' amongst American Blacks. You can understand this. As a general rule, people prefer to live among their kind. This may be members of the same religious group, race, or ethnicity. For example, San Francisco has its Chinatown and Chicago a Little Italy, which was the main location of that city's Italian community. But there is a difference between voluntary settlements, which just happen to be areas where a particular religion or ethnicity happens to live, and those deliberately planned which consciously exclude people because of their race.
Pro-Black Apartheid and the International Third Position
Round about 1985 the British newspaper, the Observer, published a piece fearing the demand for apartheid in Britain by sections of the Black community. It was a direct attack on the Black activist and Labour MP, Paul Boateng, who had called for autonomous Black communities in Britain. Now it seems that the same drives and demands have resurfaced in America by Black radicals in the wake of Black Lives Matter.
And there's a section of the White Nazi movements which wants the same thing. In the 1960s Malcolm X and the Nation of Islam used to hold joint rallies with the American Nazi party. They both saw a common interest in dividing America on racial grounds. The Blacks would have the eastern seaboard, while the rest of America would be reserved for Whites. In the 1990s there was a strain of British Fascism called the Third International Position. This wanted separate communities for Blacks, including their own schools. It was opposed by the majority of Nazis, like the BNP's leader, Nick Griffin, who wanted their total repatriation. But it was also opposed by mainstream anti-racists and opponents of apartheid.
But now it appears apartheid is back, and being championed as pro-Black and anti-racist. It shouldn't matter who's doing it. Segregation and apartheid is always wrong, and should always be fought and combated.
Tags:Abolitionists, Alt Right, American Civil War, American Constitution, American Nazi Party, anti-racism, Apartheid, Ashley Scott, Baptists, Barry Goldwater, Berbice, Black Lives Matter, Black Panther, Blacks, Blavity, BNP, Chicago, Christianity, Civil Rights, Conservatives, Declaration of Independence, Demerara, Desegregation, Dr. Hoby, Elites, Elizabeth Forster-Nietzsche, Ethnic Minorities, Georgia (America), Granville Sharpe, Guyana, Insider, International Third Position, jamaica, Jews, Jim Crow, Labour Party, Liberia, Lyndon Johnson, Malcolm X, Midwestly, Mormons, Nation of Islam, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, New York State, Nick Griffin, Nietzsche, Paul Boateng, Puritanism, racism, Religious Toleration, Renee Walter, San Francisco, Science Fiction, Segregation, Sierra Leone, Songs of Praise, Stonecrest, The Observer, the Poor, the Rich, Toomsboro, Tulsa, University of Michigan, Utah, White Supremacism, Whites, Wilkinson County, William Knibb, Youtube
Posted in Africa, America, Banks, Caribbean, Comics, Democracy, Education, Fascism, Film, France, Germany, History, Judaism, Law, LIterature, Nazis, Persecution, Philosophy, Politics, Poverty, Science, Slavery, Socialism, Technology, Television, The Press | Leave a Comment »
Hurrah! Katie Hopkins Evicted from Twitter
Earlier this week anti-racism activists finally succeeded in having hatey Katie Hopkins banned from Twitter. Hopkins started her notorious career as one of the contestants in the British version of The Apprentice. She was one of the runners-up, but her noxious right-wing beliefs nevertheless got her taken on as a columnist for the Scum and the Heil. She lost these thanks to her very outspoken racism.
In this clip from Novara Media's Tysky Sour, Michael Walker and Aaron Bastani discuss her noxious career. This included such lows as her infamous description of immigrants and asylum seekers as 'cockroaches' for whom she had absolutely no love. This made that last sentiment very clear in a Tweet aimed at Philip Schofield after the sinking of a migrant ship and its human cargo in the Med. The newspapers covered this with a picture of a grieving father, who had stopped at Turkey, looking at the body of his infant son, which had just been washed up on the beach. Hopkins went on to say that illegal immigrants should be gunned down if they tried to cross into Britain. But perhaps the nadir came in a Tweet she made after the Manchester bombing in which she called for a 'final solution'. This was too much even for whatever paper was then employing her, and she was given the heave-ho. But she was still free to spew her hate on Twitter. And now she's lost even that.
Bastani and Walker agree that her banning is an open and shut case. She deserved it. But they also point out that the people who enabled her by giving her platforms and newspaper columns are still around. Stig Abell was the editor of the Scum who took her on. He hasn't been damaged, and is now at the Times, where he's pretending to be the voice of moderation. Well, I've absolutely no respect for the Times and its sister paper, the Sunday Times, because of their repeated smears and libels against the left, and particularly of Jeremy Corbyn and his supporters, including Mike. While they use a much more extensive vocabulary and are aimed at a far better educated readership than the Scum, those two rags are still utter, disgraceful trash. The time's long past when all of the mendacious Tory press should have been cleaned out of his liars, propagandists and smear merchants.
I've no doubt that there are complaints against Hopkin's ban as well as accusations of censorship, but I don't think her defenders really have a case. There have been cases like Hopkins' before, in which a right-winger with very racist or intolerant views has been banned from a social media platform like Twitter or YouTube. Their supporters have always tried to defend them on the grounds of free speech. But in America, this clause of the Constitution only applies to the government. They can't imprison or persecute citizens for expressing their beliefs. But it doesn't apply to private corporations.
Twitter is a private company. According to Conservatives and Libertarians, private industry should be left to do whatever it likes within reason in the pursuit of profit. Government should respect the rule of laissez faire economics and not interfere. But Twitter is a private company, and so it can, by the same reasoning, decide who or what it wants on its platform. And if it decides that hatey Katie has violated its terms and conditions, it has every right to throw her off. Also, Britain and other European countries don't quite have free speech. A wide variety of opinions are permitted, but nevertheless it is an offence under British law to incite racial hatred. I'm not sure if someone has ever tried to prosecute her under the terms of the act, but she has certainly sailed close to the wind.
Hopkins has moved to Parler, which according to Zelo Street is rapidly becoming a cesspool full of racists like her and other extreme right-wingers, like the vile Toby Young. This is bad news for Hopkins as it means that she will probably never recover her popularity or audience. One of her fellows down there is Milo Yiannopolis, formerly of Breitbart. Yiannopolis is gay, half-Jewish and married to a Black man. But he's another extreme right-wing propagandist, who made his name with attacks on ethnic minorities and feminism. All was going well for him. He had a speaking tour of American universities and a book deal with Simon & Schuster's right-wing imprint. Then he appeared on the Joe Rogan Show and made comments suggesting he approved of paedophilia. At this point, it all vanished, including Yiannopolis' invitation to CPAC or some other Conservative event. Yiannopolis tearfully retracted his comments, apologised and said that he now recognised that he also was a victim of child abuse. But it was to no avail. He was also turfed off Twitter, and has no joined in his fellow rightists in Parler.
Yiannopolis was also a massive grifter. He was also begging for money. One of his money-making schemes was appealing for donations for a bursary he was setting up so young White men could afford to go to college. He received plenty of money, but it all went straight into Yiannopolis' own bank account. There was no bursary, and he never paid any aspiring underprivileged White male student anything. When last I took notice of him, Yiannopolis was claiming that he debts of £4 million. His chances of paying this off are slim. According to Zelo Street, his messages on Parler have included whinges that he now only has 1001 followers, who never go to anything he does, or buy anything from him. Well hard cheese. If only the same thing happened to others like him, who preached race hate and exploited the gullible. Now Hopkins is in the same boat, and likely to have the same difficulty recovering anything like her former success.
The only pity is that Abell and the rest of the 'respectable' Tory horrors that facilitated her haven't also suffered the same treatment.
See also: https://zelo-street.blogspot.com/2020/06/parler-vous-racist-sewer.html
https://zelo-street.blogspot.com/2020/06/so-farewell-then-katie-hopkins.html
Tags:'Free Speech, Aaron Bastani, American Constitution, Blacks, Bombings, Breitbart, Child Abuse, Conservatives, CPAC, Daily Mail, Ethnic Minorities, Feminism, Gays, Immigrants, Jeremy Corbyn, Jews, Joe Rogan Show, Katie Hopkins, laissez-faire, Libel, Manchester, Men, Michael Walker, Mike Sivier, Milo Yiannopolis, Novara Media, Parler, Philip Schofield, Private Industry, Shootings, Simon & Schuster, Stig Abell, Sunday Times, The Apprentice, The Sun, The Times, Toby Young, Twitter, Universities, Whites, Youtube
Posted in Charity, Crime, Democracy, Education, Industry, Islam, Law, LIterature, Persecution, Politics, Television, Terrorism, The Press, Turkey | Leave a Comment »
Tory Press Goes Full InfoWars as Sunday Times Compares Corbyn with Mugabe
What kind of drugs are the hacks at the Sunday Times on? Because whatever it is they're doing, it's not normal dope. Not from the stuff they're writing. I've heard that very heavy, long term use of cannabis and amphetamines can cause psychosis. Heavy ketamine use can also cause paranoia. The pioneering psychologist John Lilley, who invented the sensory isolation tank and began the scientific attempt to communicate with dolphins was at one time shooting up ketamine every hour. His mind got so twisted on the drug, that he became convinced that there were solid state, computer civilisations out in space conspiring against us. In fact, he was so convinced, he was considering phoning up the president of the US. As this was the early '70s, and the president was Richard Nixon, this could have been an extremely interesting, if possibly short, conversation. I can only conclude that the hacks in the Tory press, and very definitely the Sunday Times, are on some kind of terrible recreational chemicals from the rubbish they've written about Jeremy Corbyn.
Last weekend's Sunday Times was a case in point. This carried an article by hack Sarah Baxter, in which she declared that
"People are being as gullible about Corbyn getting a whiff of power as I was about Mugabe".
Say whaaaat! As Zelo Street's article about this latest slur against the Labour leader has pointed out, since Corbyn was elected head of the party in 2015 the right-wing press has been telling everyone that Corbyn was the reincarnation of Lenin, Stalin, Mao Zhedong, Pol Pot, Fidel Castro, Hugo Chávez, Erich Honecker, Nikita Khrushchev, Nicolai Ceaucescu, Josep Tito, and even Osama bin Laden.
The Sage of Crewe pointed out that Corbyn isn't a Marxist, merely because the right-wing press says so. And that Marxism is not the same thing as the political system of the former Communist bloc, including China. The peeps on Twitter also weren't impressed. The Zelo Street article contains a selection of comments from people sick and disgusted with Baxter's noxious slur. Dane Harrison tweeted
"Yeah fine. Why not, Jeremy Corbyn is Robert Mugabe. He's also a Jihadi, an IRA operative, Kim Jong Un, Joseph Stalin and a Czech spy. Aren't you embarrassed by the character assassination? Crazy idea, why don't you rub two brain cells together and come up with a real critique?"
Hindu Monkey said
"Another morning. Another right wing paper casually comparing [Jeremy Corbyn] – a man who has fought his whole life for peace, with a mass murderer" and added that he f**king hated the media barons who run this beautiful country.
The tweeters noticed how the Times was trying to distract everyone from BoJob's attack on democracy with the smear. Zelo Street commented
'The "look over there" factor was also clear, with "The Times, there, running a column that positions Corbyn as a Mugabe figure whilst Boris Johnson ices out his cabinet, suspends Parliament and literally tries to break the law to force through his extreme agenda" and "The Times: Damn, Boris Johnson really triggered the libs by suspending Parliament … Also the Times: Just like Robert Mugabe, Jeremy Corbyn harbours contempt for our institutions of democracy". Sarah Baxter's deflection and propagandising duly busted.'
See: https://zelo-street.blogspot.com/2019/09/murdoch-goon-says-corbyn-is-now-mugabe.html
These ad hominem attacks on Corbyn remind me of the vicious racist smears the Republicans and their media flung at Obama when he was president. He was supposed to be a militant Muslim infiltrator, determined to bring down America from within and turn into an Islamic country ruled by sharia law. Or else he was a militant atheist. Or a Communist. Or a Nazi. It didn't matter that all of the smears together are mutually contradictory, they were all flung at him.
He was also accused of being a viciously anti-White racist, who was going to murder more people than Mao and Pol Pot combined. And then there were the unhinged rants of Alex Jones of Infowars, the man who believes 9/11 was an inside job and thinks the evils of the world are caused by the globalist elite. Who are all Satanic socialist millionaires in touch with creatures from another dimension. Or something. Jones, before he was thrown off YouTube and other internet platforms, ranted that Obama was planning to seize control of the US and make himself its dictator. He was going to call a state of emergency, and then decent, law-abiding right-wing Americans would be herded into FEMA camps. This was when he wasn't denouncing Obama as the Antichrist. Yup, he reckoned Obama was the Antichrist, because he smelt and there were always flies around him. Or so he claimed. Mind you, he also thought Hillary Clinton was a Satanic lesbian witch, possessed by demons, and possibly a cyborg.
Well, Obama has come and gone. He signally was not a Nazi, nor a militant atheist, Commie or militant Islamist. He has not killed tens of millions of White Christians, overthrown the government or declared a national emergency forcing people into FEMA camps. Neither has he turned America into a Muslim country under Islamic law. The separation of Church and state in the Constitution makes that, or should make it, an impossibility. And there's absolutely no danger of it, either. Several local authorities have passed laws banning the establishment of sharia law, but this is a reaction by racist Republicans to a threat that doesn't exist.
And just as Obama didn't prove to be a murderous despot, so Corbyn won't either.
But there does seem a tradition of hysterical paranoia directed at left-wing figures in the Sunset Times. Apart from that bilge about Mike and other decent people being Holocaust deniers, and the late Michael Foot being a KGB spy, way back during Bill Clinton's presidency the paper's hacks really believed in a paranoid conspiracy theory about the president. Along with a group of journos from the American Spectator, which I think must be the Speccie's transatlantic cousin, these hacks formed the 'Clinton Crazies'. There was a conspiracy theory going round that Clinton, when he was governor of Alabama, had been importing cocaine from South America using a secret airfield in that state. He was also supposed to be such an evil, malign character that 30 people connected to him had died in mysteriously circumstances, killed by their friend or employer. It was all rubbish. About 30 people connect with Clinton had died, but none of them had been assassinated on the orders of the President, as one former Clinton Crazy actually pointed out. Nevertheless, the hacks got themselves into such a state that one actually hid in his house with the blinds half-drawn, squinting through them waiting for the CIA assassination squad to turn up.
This comparison of Corbyn to Mugabe just seems to be more insane paranoia by the paper's genuinely extreme right-wing hacks. And by comparing him to Mugabe, they've now moved into the realm of real tabloid hackery. It's on a level with the bogus stories published by the Sunday Sport and the Weekly World News. The Weekly World News was infamous for running highly sensational, and obviously fake stories. My favourites were about an alien meeting Bill Clinton when he was campaigning for re-election, and promising his vote to him. And the headline, 'Mom was Bigfoot, says beastie man.' And the Sunday Sport also gained infamy when it claimed that a B 52 bomber had been found on the Moon. It then claimed in a later issue that it wasn't there, and had probably been towed away by the Space Shuttle.
The smears against Corbyn are as fictitious as all these, and all the fake stories and accusations the American right-wing media hurled at Obama. There is one difference, however. All the highly unlikely stories in the Sunday Sport and Weekly World News were probably written just to entertain. Despite the fears of academic folklorists that people would believe them, and they'd contaminate the real urban folklore about UFOs, Bigfoot and the other weird beliefs they were studying, I suspect few people, if any, actually did.
The fake stories against Corbyn are more pernicious, as they're clearly meant to be believed. Which means that the journalism in the Sunday Times and the rest of the British right-wing press is in a way actually worse. It's far more like Alex Jones and Infowars, but pretending to be a reliable paper of record. And that's no joke.
Tags:Alabama, Alex Jones, Aliens, American Constitution, American Spectator, Assassination, Bigfoot, Bill Clinton, Boris Johnson, Chairman Mao, Computers, Cyborgs, Dolphins, Drugs, Elections, Elite, Erich Honecker, Fidel Castro, Folklore, Gays, Hillary Clinton, Hugo Chavez, Infowars, IRA, Jeremy Corbyn, John Lilley, Labour Party, lenin, Massacres, Nicolai Ceaucescu, Nikita Khrushchev, Osama bin Laden, Pol Pot, racism, Republican Party, Richard Nixon, Robert Mugabe, Sarah Baxter, Satanism, Sharia, stalin, Sunday Sport, Sunday Times, the Moon, The Spectator, Tito, Whites, Witchcraft, World Weekly News
Posted in America, Atheism, communism, Crime, Czech Republic, Democracy, Ireland, Islam, Law, Mental Illness, Nazis, Persecution, Politics, Psychology, Science, Secularism, Socialism, South America, Technology, Terrorism, The Press | 1 Comment »
Shameless Tory Press Continues to Promote the Policies That Are Killing the Health Service
This year is the 70th anniversary of the greatest achievement of Clement Atlee's government: the creation of the NHS. This was to be a system of socialised medicine, which was to be universal and free at the point of delivery. And the Tory right has hated it ever since.
The BBC has been commemorating the NHS's birth with a series of programmes, including A People's History of the NHS. The series' name recalls the book, A People's History of the United States, which looked at the history of the US from the point of view of ordinary Americans, including women, Blacks and other minorities, who have had to struggle to gain their freedoms, rather than the elite White men who framed the Constitution. These last were rich patricians, who feared real American democracy because it would lead to attacks on their privileged social position. Needless to say, the book has not been popular with Republicans.
At the same time, the NHS is in acute crisis due to the massive funding cuts inflicted by Cameron's and Tweezer's Tory administrations. Tweezer has declared that she will put so many billions into the NHS by 2022, but her estimations still fall short of what is actually required. Besides, regarding the NHS, the Tories cannot be trusted on anything. Remember how David Cameron promised he was going to ringfence NHS spending so that it would not be affected by his austerity programme? The first thing he did when he got in No. 10 was wind up his campaign against Labour's hospital closures, starting closing them himself, and cut funding to the NHS. And then resume the Thatcherite programme of dismantling it through piecemeal privatisation.
So what has been the attitude of the Tory press to the current NHS crisis? Well, the Spectator, Telegraph and various other right-wing rags have decided to go on as usual, promoting the same policies that are destroying this most precious of British institutions. They've declared that extra money isn't needed, just more cuts to eliminate waste, and that rather than the Tories reforms destroying it, they're needed more than ever.
Neither is remotely true. The cuts imposed by the Tories have manifestly not led to any improvements. The only thing they have done is lifted the tax burden for the extremely rich. At the same time, the privatisations the Tories and their predecessor, New Labour, have insisted upon have not increased efficiency either. They've actually led to closures of hospitals and GPs' surgeries as the private companies running them have sought to increase their profits. Far from being more efficient, private healthcare is actually more expensive and wasteful than state healthcare, as private firms have advertising and legal departments and must show a profit for their shareholders. Private hospitals, whatever Jeremy Hunt may rave about them, are typically smaller than their NHS counterparts. About forty percent of the expenditure in private healthcare firms may be in administration, a much higher percentage than that of the nationalised NHS.
Private healthcare is wasteful and inefficient. Which is why the Tory and New Labour businessmen and politicos with links to it want to remove the NHS and give private medicine instead state support.
And those voices, demanding that the NHS be privatised through more free market reforms, are shouting in the Speccie and Torygraph. And I've noticed that these are the pieces that are being reprinted in the I's opinion matrix column, which selects pieces from elsewhere in the press. To my knowledge, the column has not included any newspaper pieces demanding that the NHS be renationalised. Because that's one of Corbyn's dreadful Trotskyite policies, obviously.
This shows the real contempt the hacks and management at both the Spectator and the Torygraph, as well as the other Conservative rags that share their views on NHS reform, have for the people of this country. They want the NHS to be privatised, and so British people's health to suffer catastrophically, just to create more profits for the private healthcare firms, on whose boards they serve, and give more tax cuts to the already obscenely rich, while the poor are forced further into poverty.
Get them out, and Corbyn in for a government that really cares about the NHS.
Tags:'A People's History of the NHS', 'A People's History of the United States', 'I' Newspaper, American Constitution, Austerity, BBC, Blacks, Clement Atlee, Conservatives, Cuts, David Cameron, Doctors' Surgeries, Funding, Hospital Closures, Jeremy Corbyn, Jeremy Hunt, Labour Party, Minorities, New Labour, NHS, NHS Privatisation, Private Healthcare, Private Healthcare Companies, Republican Party, Tax Cuts, the Elite, the Rich, The Spectator, The Telegraph, Theresa May, Trotskyism, Women
Posted in America, communism, Democracy, Economics, England, Health Service, History, Hospitals, Industry, Medicine, Politics, Poverty, Socialism, Television, The Press | 1 Comment »
Will Killary and the Generals Get Their War with Russia?
The news yesterday that a number of EU countries had followed Britain's lead and expelled Russian diplomats is alarming. This is ratcheting up the tension with Russia to Cold War levels. Despite the lack of definitive evidence that the Russians were behind the poisoning of the Skripals, May and nearly the rest of the countries in the EU have decided that Putin is responsible. And I'm afraid that the tensions they're fomenting will ultimately lead to war.
Killary began all this nonsense about Russia interfering in western elections as a way of diverting blame from herself for his massive failure to convince Americans to vote her. She's a horrible candidate – a massively privileged, neoliberal corporatist, who has absolutely no sympathy for the working class, and whose policies on drugs with her husband actively damaged the Black community. She took working class votes for granted and didn't even bother to campaign in many traditional Democrat states. Instead, she did what Blair did over here and went chasing the upper and upper-middle classes. As a result, she alienated many voters, who would otherwise have voted Democrat. She did get a million or so votes more than Trump, but lost through the machinations of the Electoral College, a very undemocratic institution that was originally set up to allow slave-holding states to count their slaves as less than human so they would have voting equality with free states. She could have blamed the electoral and demanded its abolition. Many others have. But she didn't. Obviously, she's quite happy with that very undemocratic part of the American electoral system.
Unable to accept her responsibility for losing the election, and a strong supporter of the status quo, she turned to blaming Russia. In doing so, she joined a number of far right organisations, including eugenicist groups founded by former Nazis, who believed that the poor and Blacks are biologically unfit and so should be denied state welfare. And even before she lost the election, she showed a very strong hostility to Russia.
From reading articles in Counterpunch, it appears that the current policy in the White House and the Pentagon is for 'full spectrum dominance'. That means that America should be the world's only superpower, with an unchallenged military dominance of the rest of the world. What America, and its elite leader, including Hillary Clinton, fear is the rise of the multipolar world. They cannot tolerate the emergence of political and economic rivals, such as Russia, or China, or India, for that matter. Hence the massive increase in military spending. Under Obama's administration, Hillary's foreign policy towards Russia and China was militantly hostile and she seemed keen to ramp hostility to both these nations to dangerous levels.
And on this side of the Pond, various NATO generals also forecast war with Russia. One of them, a deputy-head of NATO, actually had a book published a couple of years ago entitled 2017: War with Russia, in which he predicted last year that Russia would invade Latvia, and this would spark a war between Russia and NATO. He predicted it would all happen last May. Fortunately, the month came and went and Russia didn't. But NATO troops were massing on Russia's borders, which would serve as a provocation to the Russians. Russia is encircled by NATO bases, and has sent military advisers to the Fascist regime in Ukraine.
As I've blogged many times before, much of this renewed American hostility to Russia has nothing to do with concerns about democracy and human rights. It's purely economic. The American multinationals that poured millions into backing Yeltsin at the end of the Cold War did so in the expectation that the ensuing massive privatisation of Russian state assets would allow them to dominate the Russian economy. But Putin has stopped that. Thus the massive corporate anger against Putin's Russia. Putin is a thug, who has his critics and opponents beaten and killed, but that's not the reason the American political elite and their counterparts over here hate him.
I'm very much afraid that this latest round of expulsions will end by creating more tension, in a cycle that will end in a war with Russia, perhaps using a manufactured incident as a pretext for invading them. The pressure the government placed on Porton Down to state that the chemical used to poison the Skripals was definitely Russian is very, very similar to the pressure Blair and his cronies put on MI6 to 'sex up' the dodgy dossier and claim that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction that he could launch within 45 minutes. He didn't. The British and American publics were lied to, and despite massive opposition the west invaded Iraq. And the result has been nearly two decades of chaos and carnage.
And I'm afraid the same process is going on here to create another war for the benefit of the American military-industrial complex and big corporations desperate to get their hands on Russian resources and industries.
It needs to be stopped. Now. Before war really does break out, a war that could see millions die, and our beautiful planet turned into an irradiated cinder.
Tags:'Counterpunch', 'Military-Industrial Complex', 2017: War with Russia, American Constitution, Armed Forces, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Blacks, Boris Yeltsin, Chemical Weapons, Diplomats, Donald Trump, Drugs, Electoral College, Eugenics, Hillary Clinton, Iraq Invasion, Latvia, MI6, Multinationals, NATO, Natural Resources, Nuclear War, Poison, Porton Down, Privatisation, Saddam Hussein, Sergei Skripal, tony blair, Upper Classes, Upper Middle Classes, War, Weapons of Mass Destruction, Working Class, Yulia Skripal
Posted in America, China, Crime, Democracy, European Union, Evolutionary Theory, Fascism, India, Industry, LIterature, Politics, Russia, Slavery, Ukraine, Welfare Benefits | Leave a Comment »
Gabriel Rockhill on the Myth of American Democracy
A few months ago, the Franco-American philosopher Gabriel Rockhill published a very interesting piece in Counterpunch arguing that, contrary to how the country sees itself, America isn't and has never been a democracy. He notes that the British imperialists, who founded the Thirteen Colonies, weren't interested in spreading rights or democracy, and that the Founding Fathers were also anti-democratic. They were like most of the other Enlightenment thinkers in that they were keen to defend to property from the mass of the propertyless, whom they associated with misrule and the mob. He points out that at the time the suffrage only extended to men of property, and excluded the poor, women, First Nations and slaves. The notion that the country was a democracy first appeared with Andrew Jackson, who styled himself as a democrat purely as an electoral pose without doing anything to extend the franchise. He writes
Second, when the elite colonial ruling class decided to sever ties from their homeland and establish an independent state for themselves, they did not found it as a democracy. On the contrary, they were fervently and explicitly opposed to democracy, like the vast majority of European Enlightenment thinkers. They understood it to be a dangerous and chaotic form of uneducated mob rule. For the so-called "founding fathers," the masses were not only incapable of ruling, but they were considered a threat to the hierarchical social structures purportedly necessary for good governance. In the words of John Adams, to take but one telling example, if the majority were given real power, they would redistribute wealth and dissolve the "subordination" so necessary for politics. When the eminent members of the landowning class met in 1787 to draw up a constitution, they regularly insisted in their debates on the need to establish a republic that kept at bay vile democracy, which was judged worse than "the filth of the common sewers" by the pro-Federalist editor William Cobbett. The new constitution provided for popular elections only in the House of Representatives, but in most states the right to vote was based on being a property owner, and women, the indigenous and slaves—meaning the overwhelming majority of the population—were simply excluded from the franchise. Senators were elected by state legislators, the President by electors chosen by the state legislators, and the Supreme Court was appointed by the President. It is in this context that Patrick Henry flatly proclaimed the most lucid of judgments: "it is not a democracy." George Mason further clarified the situation by describing the newly independent country as "a despotic aristocracy."
When the American republic slowly came to be relabeled as a "democracy," there were no significant institutional modifications to justify the change in name. In other words, and this is the third point, the use of the term "democracy" to refer to an oligarchic republic simply meant that a different word was being used to describe the same basic phenomenon. This began around the time of "Indian killer" Andrew Jackson's presidential campaign in the 1830s. Presenting himself as a 'democrat,' he put forth an image of himself as an average man of the people who was going to put a halt to the long reign of patricians from Virginia and Massachusetts. Slowly but surely, the term "democracy" came to be used as a public relations term to re-brand a plutocratic oligarchy as an electoral regime that serves the interest of the people or demos. Meanwhile, the American holocaust continued unabated, along with chattel slavery, colonial expansion and top-down class warfare.
He then goes to argue that America today is also not a democracy. It has elections, but in fact the American people aren't governing themselves, but merely choosing which members of a plutocratic ruling class they want to govern them. And his last point is that the anti-democratic nature of American politics is shown very clearly in how often America has interfered in the elections of foreign nations – either through manipulation, or by invasion – when those countries haven't elected the leaders America wants.
The article's well worth reading, and is at https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/12/13/the-u-s-is-not-a-democracy-it-never-was/
Douglas Adams made a similar point in his Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. On one of the fictional worlds described by the Guide, there are two races. The planet's society is stratified, so that one of the races is the ruling class, and the other their subordinates. But it is a democracy. Ever so often, elections are held, in which the subordinate race goes off to vote for whichever members of the dominant race they want in power. But the position of the dominant race and their right to rule is never questioned.
I don't know whether this is one of the other Hitchhiker books, or if it was just in the radio series. But it's a good satirical description of the way western class politics works. It's probably more true now than it was in Adams' time, as the Blairites and the Tories come from the same middle class, and promote the same free market, neoliberal policies, which the rest of us are expected to support uncritically. It's time to break this class monopoly on power.
Tags:'Counterpunch', 'The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy', American Constitution, Amerindians, Andrew Jackson, Class, Conservatives, Coups, Douglas Adams, Electoral Interventions, Free Market Ideology, Gabriel Rockhill, George Mason, House of Representatives, Imperialism, Middle Class, Neoliberalism, Patrick Henry, Slaves, The Enlightenment, the Poor, tony blair, William Cobbett, Women
Posted in America, Comedy, Democracy, Economics, England, France, History, LIterature, Philosophy, Politics, Radio | 2 Comments »
Sam Seder on Disney's Animatronic Donald Trump
Well, as Freddie Mercury once sang in Queen's epic track, 'Machines', 'The machines take over', and this time there really 'ain't no rock 'n' roll'. Or as the blurb for this video puts it instead, the Trump animatronic is so horrifying it'll haunt your dreams.
Disney have created a robot version of America's most unpopular fascistic president for their Hall of Presidents. The Trumpdroid stands in front of the other animatronic US presidents, and recites a speech, with appropriate gestures and body movements, about his august predecessors were responsible for crafting the American constitution and political structure, and so creating the freedom that Americans enjoy today.
And Seder and his co-hosts are right: it is very creepy. The robotics technology used to animate the machine is really impressive, but it does bear out the observation of one Japanese robotics scientist. I forgotten the fellow's name, unfortunately, but he shrewdly observed that people are uncomfortable with things that resemble them closely, but are still very different. Hence the human discomfort with robots when they become a little too accurate. Something similar was also said by Red Dwarf's Kryten way back in the 1990s. Lister, or one of the other members of the ship's highly dysfunctional crew, ask him why his manufacturers have made him look very much less than a perfect replica of a human. He replies by stating that it's because this would make people feel uncomfortable around him, for exactly the same reasons the Japanese scientist suggested. And way back in the mid-1970s, an irrational fear of robots – 'robophobia', or 'Grimwade's Syndrome', was one of the plot elements in the Tom Baker Dr. Who serial 'The Robots of Death'. This particular serial was set on a sandminer, a vast mining vehicle, operated by a small human crew under which was a much larger labour force of robots. And the robots start shaking off their servitude. It's explained in the show that some people have an irrational fear of robots, because although they look like humans, they don't employ any body language. And so to them they appear as 'the walking dead'.
Rather more humorously, Seder and his friends joke that the other mechanical presidents are looking at the Trumpdroid wondering how on Earth it got there. And that the President Lincoln android is just about to tell the rest of them that there's no choice for it now: they have to put the pistols to their heads and blow their little robot brains out. They also joke that it's rather like the bit on the SF series Westworld, when the robots look down at themselves and finally realise what they are.
Rather more seriously, the clip begins with a discussion between Seder and a caller about the GOP's tax bill, and why people join the Republican party. He states some join, because they hate the Environmental Protection Agency, and what to use highly toxic pesticides on their land, like Tom Delaye. Others really hate trade unions, and what to destroy them to keep ordinary people poor. But the majority do it to enrich themselves through corporate sponsorship. Such is the state of American politics. And the same comments also apply to the corporate Dems of Hillary Clinton, and to the Conservatives and Blairite Labour over this side of the Pond.
If these characters remain in power, perhaps the world would be much better if the machines really took over. Or the Xenomorphs from the Alien franchise. After all, as Ripley says in the 2nd film, Aliens, when she discovers the way she and the space marines have been betrayed by the Corporation, the aliens 'don't f**k each other over for a percentage'.
Tags:'WestWorld' (Television), Abraham Lincoln, Alien, Aliens, American Constitution, American Presidents, Conservative Party, Corporate Democrats, Corporate Donors, Democrat Party, Disney, Donald Trump, Dr. Who, Environmental Protection Agency, Freddie Mercury, Hilllary Clinton, Labour Party, Pesticides, Queen, Red Dwarf, Republican Party, Robots, Sam Seder, Sam Seder's Majority Report, Tax, Tom Baker, Tom Delaye, tony blair
Posted in Agriculture, America, Comedy, Democracy, Film, History, Mental Illness, Music, Politics, Popular Music, Poverty, Psychology, Science, Technology, Television, Trade Unions | Leave a Comment »
Kevin Logan's Angry Message to America about Donald Trump's 'Britain First' Retweets
This is a very angry little snippet from Kevin Logan, where he tears into Donald Trump, and asks Americans to keep their 'monkey boy' on a leash because of Trump's infamous retweets of the Britain First Islamophobic videos. He starts by hoping that one day, Trump will be in a different kind of institution than the one he's occupying now. He states that it's disturbing that Trump has the same thoughts and opinions as Britain First He points out that Britain First aren't any kind of genuinely constructive, respectable group, but a race-hate group with a list of convictions as long as your arm. He states that the videos and retweets have been condemned by politicos across the spectrum, from both Left and Right. He states that if Americans want to f*ck up their own country, they can do it. Looking forward to 2020, he predicts a joint ticked by Richard Spencer, the head of the Alt-Right and David Duke, the notorious anti-Semite and head of the Ku Klux Klan in Alabama. It's the direction America's been travelling down for a very long time, so they may as well do it. But just don't f*ck up ours.
I'm posting this as Logan speaks for most people in England, and their anger at the Orange Nazi deciding to promote these racist videos. Britain First are a Nazi grouplet, who've specialised in invading mosques to harangue the worshippers there. Which is very definitely not a way to bring anyone to Christ. Fransen herself is a devout Roman Catholic, which is kind of odd as I think the group also has links to Protestant terror gangs in Northern Ireland.
There's an article on here and the retweets at Hope Not Hate at
https://hopenothate.com/2017/11/29/trump-retweets-uk-far-right-extremist/
Since their article was posted, a bit more information has come forward about some of the videos. One of them, which purports to show a Muslim attacking a boy on crutches in the Netherlands, has been investigate by Holland's finest. They state that the attacker was not a Muslim, and not a migrant either.
Yesterday one of the foreign correspondents for the I talked about his investigation of one of the videos, of youths in Egypt throwing another gang off a roof to their deaths. This came from the Egyptian uprising in 2012, and neither of the gangs were Islamists. It was simply one political faction attacking another. He also states that the violence wasn't all one way, as on the same day that occurred the army had shot 51 members of the Muslim brotherhood.
Even if the videos were all true and accurate, and did show genuine Muslim violence, this still wouldn't reflect the reality of Islam in Britain. Of course you can find Muslim criminality, violence and bigotry. Just as you can amongst every other religious, ethnic or political group in the world. All it means is that Muslims aren't saints, but human beings like the rest of us. And the people carrying out the attacks would be carrying them out because they're thugs, who happen to be Muslims, not necessarily because of some deep reason within the religion itself.
I do have reservations about Logan holding the whole of America collectively responsible for Donald Trump. I think that, looking at the number of votes, neither he nor Killary actually had any kind of mandate to govern. It wasn't the case the of the most popular winning, but of the least unpopular.
And by rights, it should have gone to Killary. But she won because of that terribly undemocratic American institution, the Electoral College. Which was set up in the 19th century to give the southern, slave-holding states a big enough population for them to affect presidential elections, without having to emancipate their Black slaves and give them the vote.
Large sections of the American population very definitely didn't vote for Trump. Blacks didn't, on the whole. Neither did the Asian community. Working class Whites didn't either. The people, who did vote for Trump tended to be whatever remains of the affluent middle class, who feel threatened by organised labour and immigration. And even then, their reasons for voting for the monster may have been much more complex than simple racism. Trump threw out all kinds of policies during his election campaign, basically saying anything on the spur of the moment that sounded good. Thus, at one point he was anti-interventionist, and wanted to pull the country out of the foreign wars. He also briefly appeared to back single-payer healthcare.
So in some ways, and some points, he actually appeared more left-wing than Killary.
And Killary is as monstrous as he is. She is a vicious warmonger, who backs Fascist dictators and goes on holiday with Henry Kissinger, a man responsible for atrocities around the world of which the Nazis would have been both ashamed and proud. I've no doubt that Sarah Sarandon was right, and that had Killary won, we would be at war by now. Probably against Russia and China, as she has a bitter hatred of these nations.
And despite her protestations of multicultural warm fuzziness, Killary has shown throughout her career just how little respect she has for the Black folks, who actually vote Republican. She was responsible for framing the drugs legislation that sent a disproportionately high number of Black men to jail. She referred to 'superpredators' at a time when that phrase was only used of young Black men. And when they overthrew Gaddafi, she giggled about it, and was proudly seen with the Islamists responsible waving their guns. The same Islamists responsible for enslaving Black migrants and Libyans. When they aren't massacring them.
But, unlike Trump, she is marginally better at simulating being a civilised, urbane human being. Unlike the expensively educated savage now sitting in the Oval Office. What she couldn't hide was her greed, her arrogance, her overwhelming sense of entitlement and her sheer lack of sympathy for ordinary Americans. She was the wrong candidate, but she had clout and the backing of the corporations.
It isn't America that's responsible for Trump. It's the corrupt American military-industrial complex and the corporatist system it's spawned.
And millions of severely normal Americans aren't happy. Trump's had city after city defy his Muslim ban, which has been rejected by one governor and attorney general after another as unconstitutional, including bright red Republicans. It's why there are moves to have him impeached.
Trump is the creation of a corrupt American political system. But it's one that an increasing number of Americans are mobilising against, as well as fighting to bring down the president, who's destroying their country.
Tags:'Military-Industrial Complex', 'Ulster', Alt Right, American Constitution, anti-semitism, Asians, Blacks, Britain First, Corporate Donors, Corporations, Corporatism, David Duke, Donald Trump, Drugs, Electoral College, Henry Kissinger, Hillary Clinton, Impeachment, Islamism, Islamophobia, Jayda Fransen, Kevin Logan, Ku Klux Klan, Middle Class, Muslim Ban, Muslim Brotherhood, Muslims, Non-Interventionism, Northern Ireland, Prison, Protestants, Republican Party, Richard Spencer, Single-Payer Healthcare, Wars, Whites, Working Class
Posted in America, Asia, China, Crime, Democracy, Education, Egypt, England, Fascism, Health Service, History, Industry, Ireland, Islam, Libya, Nazis, Persecution, Politics, Roman Catholicism, Russia, Slavery, Terrorism | 1 Comment »
Fox News Drools over Mandatory Patriotism Class in College of the Ozarks
The use of patriotism as a disguise for right-wing indoctrination gets another boost in this small section of the American education system. In this clip from Secular Talk, host Kyle Kulinski talks about a piece on Fox News, where they discuss the introduction of a new, mandatory freshman class on patriotism and the military at the College of the Ozarks with the college's president, Gerry Davis. Actually, discuss is probably not the right word. 'Rave about' and 'fawn over' are probably better descriptors.
Davis states that the course will including rifle shooting, map reading and tying knots, as well as respect for the flag, as these parts of the curriculum are modelled on basic training in the American military. He states that everyone in America owes a debt to their armed forces. As for sport, he states that the college football and other sports teams would not play another side, whose team members refused to stand for the flag. And he states that it's disrespectful for a squaddie, who's served in Afghanistan, to have to see some multi-millionaire kneeling. This is clearly a reference to Colin Kaepernick and the other American football players, who have knelt when the flag is raised before games to show their support for Black Lives Matter and protest the shooting of unarmed Blacks.
Kulinski is understandable bitterly critical about the double standards towards free speech shown by the college and its administrators, and by the Republicans towards peaceful protest. He states that if others were assembling a course on patriotism, a few of the things they might put in it could be the Civil Rights movement, perhaps the New Deal, and the Constitution. But none of those are included, because it doesn't reflect the personal tastes of Davis himself. And any course on patriotism should include how great it is to live in a country, that will allow you to burn the flag in a peaceful protest. He points out that peaceful protest is one of the most American of institutions. But this move means that it is ruled out, and there is literally no way people can express their feelings about injustice as these are also angrily denounced or suppressed by the patriotic right. If they march in the street, they're accused of making a mountain out of a molehill. They can't riot without being denounced, obviously, and so, with simply kneeling for the flag also attacked, there is simply nothing they can do to raise awareness of the issue of the cops killing innocent Blacks. And this is the attitude of the American patriotic right.
Who claim they are the defenders of free speech, except when it challenges the flag and the military. 'You f***ing hypocrites', Kulinski describes them.
As for ending the cavalier judicial murder of Black Americans, Kulinski suggests this could be done by passing laws setting up community policing, making all police wear body cameras and ending the war on drugs.
He ends by saying that if these people were truly concerned with patriotism, they'd be willing to let people kneel for the flag, even if they didn't agree with them. But instead the president of the US himself, has said that people should fired for doing so.
Kulinski's right about all of this, and the issue of respecting the flag has been raised before. Back in the 1980s when Reagan was in the White House, there was a storm of outrage when a young member of the Communist party publicly burned the flag in protest at Reagan's policies. The great American comedian, Bill Hicks, lampooned the Republican protests and loud denunciations which followed.
He said he didn't want anyone to burn the flag. But the flag wasn't freedom. You can't burn freedom because freedom is freedom. And that includes the freedom to burn the flag. Or words to that effect. It's a long time since I listened to the joke.
As for Americans owing something to the military, that's true up to a point. This arguably begins and ends round about the Second World War and the attack on Pearl Harbour. The other wars America has fought across the globe have not been about protecting America or democracy, but preserving capitalism against the threat of Communism. This has meant the overthrow of even moderately liberal or reformist governments in order to protect and extend American corporate interests. 9/11 was an act of war against America, but the western armed forces that are now stationed in the country have long outstayed any residual welcome they may have had, and are now in fact actively counterproductive in that they are creating opposition to the West. And the subsequent invasions and military actions that have taken place under the guise of the War on Terror, such as the Iraq invasion, the bombing of Syria and the overthrow of Gaddafi, are simply more geopolitical imperialist adventures, in which the lives of brave squaddies are being spilt simply to boost the profits of big corporations.
Perhaps if America and the West genuinely wanted to respect our troops, we would just make sure they'd only be sent in when our security was directly threatened. And not as cannon-fodder for Raytheon and the other defence contractors to make another killing on the stock exchange.
Tags:'Black Lives Matter', 'Free Speech, 'Secular Talk', 9/11, American Constitution, American Flag, American Football, Armed Forces, Big Business, Bill Hicks, Blacks, Bombings, Capitalism, Civil Rights Movement, Colin Kaepernick, College, College of the Ozarks, Corporate Power, Coups, Defence Contractors, Gaddafy, Imperialism, Kyle Kulinski, Millionaires, New Deal, Patriotism, Peaceful Protest, Pearl Harbour, Police, Raytheon, Republican Party, Ronald Reagan, Stock Exchange, War on Drugs, War On Terror, World War II
Posted in Afghanistan, America, Comedy, Crime, Democracy, Education, History, Industry, Iraq, Libya, Persecution, Politics, Sport, Syria | Leave a Comment »
The Humanist Report: Killary Gets Rough Reception in Wales
Which the American presenter pronounces as 'Welch' and 'Welsh', confusing the term for its people with the name of the country itself. But you can forgive him that because (1) he's foreign, and (2) he loves the people of Welsh for standing up to Her Highness and telling her how it really was. And he also likes Matt Free of Channel 4 News for also asking Killary tough questions, which American pundits avoid.
As I've discussed in previous blog posts, Killary, who seems to think going around with a mass-murdering creature like Henry Kissinger is a badge of honour, has been going up and down on the Earth promoting her book like crazy. It's called What Happened, and is basically her attempt to blame everyone but herself for her massive failure to win the election against a colossal moron like Donald Trump. She was Down Under a few weeks ago, giving the Aussies the benefit of her wisdom. Then she was over here, at the South Bank Centre, the Cheltenham Literary Festival and then Swansea University across the border, to receive an honorary degree. The Uni decided to grant her the honour for her work promoting women's and children's rights around the world. As the presenter here states, presumably they didn't get the message that she voted for the Iraq War.
But all did not go smoothly for Kissinger's fangirl. The students at Swansea actually booed her. And one young woman, a biochemistry student, Kirsty Lloyd, called out to her 'Bernie would've won. He would've beaten Trump.' Which he would have. He was in the lead against her in the polls, until she, Debbie Wasserman Schulz of the Democratic National Convention, and Donna Brasile, Clinton's main woman in her team, managed to steal the presidential nomination from her.
Lloyd said afterwards
"Hillary Clinton cheated Bernie Sanders of his nomination. And all those drone strikes, which kill women and children are illegal contradict the reason she is being given a doctorate – which is for doing things for women and children all over the world. The main thing she's done for women and children is kill them in drone strikes."
And things didn't get better when she was being interviewed by Matt Free. He reminded her that her share amongst women went down 1 per cent from 44 per cent under Obama to 43. Hillary then tried to rebut this by saying that it was only White women who became disillusioned with her. Overall she won amongst women. And she lost because gender is not yet a powerful factor in American elections as race is. The commenter on the Humanist Report states that this could only be the response of an American politician, who sees everything in terms of identity politics. He also points out that it's also terribly insulting to Barack Obama, as it implies that he only won the election because he was Black.
Free goes on to make the point that she lost partly because of her background. She'd already been in office – sort of – as the First Lady with Bill Clinton, and so her membership of a political dynasty worked against her. And people didn't like her as they saw her as an establishment candidate, in an age of revolution.
At which point Hillary goes off and drones on about how she led in all the debates, and was seen as the more intelligent, winning candidate. When he asks her, Clinton responds that she lost partly because of Steve Dromey and Russian 'interference'.
The Report's presenter again points out here how Killary has contradicted herself. She says she takes full responsibility for her failure, but then immediately blames other people. He also states that it's great to see how people in the rest of the world don't follow American pundits in fawning over their guests, asking easy questions. He liked the way Free made her squirm. He states that you don't see politicians like Hillary pop up elsewhere in the world, because everywhere she's seen as another sleazy, corrupt politician like all the others. Largely because of the dodgy dealings of the Clinton Foundation. But you do find politicians like Bernie Sanders appearing in other countries, like Jeremy Corbyn in Britain.
The presenter clearly makes some great points, though he and Free on Channel 4 could have challenged her about the so-called 'interference' from the Russians. They didn't lose her the election. They were trying to interfere in the American election, but no more than they usually do. Crucially, they didn't leak the incriminating emails to WikiLeaks. Those came from a Democratic insider disgruntled at her corruption.
As for her being the better candidate over Trump, he points out that Trump was trailing behind her and faced worse challenges than she did. In Utah a Mormon, Republican establishment candidate went independent to challenge Trump. And Trump faced another Republican challenger elsewhere, who took more votes away from him than Jill Stein did Hillary.
Hillary, her arrogance, corruption, and entitlement is responsible for her failings, not other people.
Except in one instance: the Electoral College. This swung overwhelmingly for Trump, despite the fact that Killary had three million votes more than he did at the popular level. And the College is an anti-democratic measure put into America's bizarre and byzantine electoral system in the 19th century in order to give some political power to the southern, slave-holding states. If America was a genuine democracy, it would have vanished a long time ago. But it's enshrined in America's constitution, and so is preserved as part of the great wisdom of the patrician founders of the American political system. Who were all patricians with a real fear of power being grabbed by the White peasants and proles, let alone Blacks. They set up the Constitution to keep power in the hands of the monied, and so have built into the system the political paralysis that is stifling the forces for real change that America needs.
Tags:'What Happened?', American Constitution, Barack Obama, Bernie Sanders, Bill Clinton, Biochemistry, Blacks, Bombings, Children, Clinton Foundation, Corruption, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Donald Trump, Donna Brasile, Drones, Election, Electoral College, Founding Fathers, Henry Kissinger, Hillary Clinton, Human Rights, Iraq Invasion, Jeremy Corbyn, Jill Stein, Kirsty Lloyd, Matt Free, Mormons, Peasants, Steve Dromey, Students, Swansea University, The Humanist Report, Utah, Whites, Wikileaks, Women, Working Class
Posted in America, Australia, Democracy, Iraq, Justice, LIterature, Politics, Russia, Science, Slavery, Television, Wales | 1 Comment »


text:
AEC firms tap into the boom in logistics center construction
A Ryan Companies project in southern California is being built to meet its city's rigorous green standards.
Industrial Facility |
An aerial view, taken this week, of the three buildings under construction that will comprise the Pacific Vista Commercial Center in Carlsbad, Calif. This Center is scheduled to start operating this fall. Image: Ryan Companies
As ecommerce assumes a more dominant role in retailing, logistics and distribution centers in support of ecommerce warehousing and delivery are springing up across the country.
For example, Verst Logistics in June opened a nearly 400,000-sf ecommerce fulfillment center in Hebron, Ky., near the Greater Cincinnati Northern Kentucky International Airport. This DC will allow Verst to distribute products to about 85% of the continental U.S. within 48 hours, says Dean Hoerlin, Verst's Vice President of Fulfillment and Distribution.
Capital Development Partners and Greenfield Partners broke ground last month on a 2.3-million-sf, $125 million logistics center located on 197 acres in Pooler, Ga., 10 miles from the Port of Savannah. The first of two buildings is set to open next April, and the two buildings will have transload capacities and be able to store more than 2,000 containers.
Also last month, construction began on the 401,577-sf Oakdale Logistics Center on 24 acres in the Dallas suburb of Grand Prairie, Texas, marking the third such development in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex between CT (a real estate investment firm) and the developer Port Logistics Realty.
"The primary focus of CT's growth strategy is to develop, own and manage a portfolio of logistics projects in high demand Tier 1 markets nationwide," says James Watson, managing partner with CT, which recently announced the development of 1.34 million sf of large-scale distribution buildings in greater Chicago.
CT also is developing logistics centers in northern California, Atlanta, and New Jersey, and its current property holdings could support the addition of 15 million sf of industrial buildings over the next five to seven years.
The Commerce Department estimates that last year consumers spent $453.5 billion for online purchases, a 16% increase over 2016. Some market watchers see ecommerce rising to nearly 14% of total retail sales by 2021, from around 10% this year.
These expanding online purchasing activities among consumers are propelling industrial construction, and presenting fertile opportunities for AEC firms in this sector.
This week, Prologis, which specializes in logistics real estate, announced its selection of Graycor Construction as GC for its I-17 Logistics Center-Phase 1, a Class A development on 25 infill acres in Phoenix that will consist of four buildings totaling 558,712 sf. This development will replace 20 outmoded buildings that were recently demolished. Completion of Phase 1 is scheduled for first quarter of 2019.
A rendering of the Prologis I-17 Logistics Center-Phase I, a 558,712-sf complex that will open in Phoenix in the fall of next year. Image: Prologis
Clayco provided construction services for the $300 million 856,000-sf Amazon Fulfillment Center in Kansas City, which opened last August and was assembled using tilt-up concrete panels and structural steel. This four-floor Center has 2.3 million sf of usable space, and employs more than 2,000 full-time workers.
Clayco has built other warehouses for Amazon in Indiana, Virginia, and New Jersey, and has an 850,000-sf facility under construction in Chicago.
Last August, Ryan Companies closed on a 25.9-acre site in Carlsbad, Calif., where it is building on spec the Pacific Vista Commercial Center, a three-building, 411,000-sf logistics/distribution center located within the Carlsbad Oaks North Business Park. Ware Malcomb provided design and architectural services. SB&O provided civil engineering and storm water design services.
Chris Wood, President of Ryan Companies' West Region, tells BD+C that this complex should be completed by October. Ryan has already secured a 10-year lease agreement with the Center's first tenant, the storage provider PODS, which will lease Building B. Wood says it is likely that the entire complex will be leased by three to five tenants.
Inland Empire can't get enough warehouse space
Ryan Companies is building into a market where demand for warehouse and logistical space seems insatiable. Wood says that, as of the third quarter of 2017, there were nearly 540 million sf of logistics/warehouse buildings in California's Riverside and San Bernardino counties. For the past several years, the Inland Empire has been adding between 20 million and 25 million sf annually.
JLL estimated that in the 12 months ended December 2017, 43.5% of leasing activities for facilities larger than 50,000 sf came from ecommerce tenants. JLL also estimated at the time that there were 24 million sf of new warehouse space under construction In the Inland Empire, where the vacancy rate was 3.5% and rents averaged 53 cents per sf.
Pacific Vista Commercial Center, says Wood, is one of the first buildings that are being constructed under Carlsbad's Climate Action Plan, which dates back to 2015, and whose goal is to reduce greenhouse gases to meet California's mandated targets.
Among the facility's innovative features is a 0.915-MW photovoltaic rooftop solar system that is allocated for each building that's designed with its own substation. The PV array is set up to offset 50% of a tenant's average utility usage, and the lease puts the system in each tenant's name for metering purposes and so the tenant can reap the full benefits of the solar array's energy output.
The Center will also offer 24 electric vehicle charging stations, as mandated by the Action Plan. There are 1.77 total parking stalls for every 1,000 sf of warehouse space in the Center.
Wood says Ryan Companies, which has been building industrial facilities for years, embraced Carlsbad's green requirements. The Center was pre-certified LEED for core and shell, and Wood says it should achieve a Silver certification at a minimum.
The 26-acre Pacific Vista Commercial Center will include segregated vehicular and trucking access points and lanes that run between the buildings. PODS, the storage supplier, is the Center's first tenant, having agreed to a 10-year lease of Building B (top right). Image: Ryan Companies
Robust tenant amenities
Greenness aside, Wood says the key leasing points of this Class A facility are its functionality, location (near the Pacific Ocean), and its flexibility.
The Center will include completely segregated vehicular and trucking access points within the open area that runs between the three buildings. It will offer one dock door position for every 4,372 sf of warehouse space, and 32 ft minimum clear heights to maximize interior cubic storage capacity.
The Center's tenant amenities include six separate outdoor employee areas with views of the surrounding open space and ocean, a centralized food truck location, sand volleyball court, bocce ball court, and a secured bicycle storage area for 35 bikes.
This $67 million project is a joint venture between Ryan Companies and Deutsche Asset Management's DWS/RREEF Property Trust division. The partners have another joint venture spec project in the works in Poway, Calif., a 530,000-sf logistics center with two buildings that is scheduled to break ground in November.
March 14, 2019 | Industrial Facility | David Malone, Associate Editor
$50 million industrial-focused business park under construction in Las Vegas
Lee & Sakahara designed the project.
A rendering of an Innovation Center that would be part of a larger expansion of the Port San Antonio, which has become a platform for connecting cybersecurity and digital innovations with leading global industries. Image: Port San Antonio and Gonzalez/Mogas Architects
March 10, 2019 | Industrial Facility | John Caulfield, Senior Editor
The burgeoning Port San Antonio lays out growth plans
Expansions would accommodate cybersecurity, aerospace, and defense tenants, and help commercialize technolo...
Courtesy SLA
February 28, 2019 | Industrial Facility | David Malone, Associate Editor
Rooftop park and ski slope on Amager Bakke waste-to-energy plant set to open in April
The park is designed to act as a 'green bomb' for the surrounding area.
Courtesy Merriman Anderson/Architects
October 25, 2018 | Industrial Facility | David Malone, Associate Editor
Pilot training center completes in Arlington, Texas
Merriman Anderson/Architects was the architect for the project.
Tesla purchases 210 acres in Shanghai with plans to build Gigafactory 3
Construction is expected to begin soon.
June 27, 2018 | Industrial Facility | David Malone, Associate Editor
Hawaii announces completion of $375 million wastewater project
The new sewer tunnel and pump station help enhance Oahu's utility infrastructure.
COurtesy: flickr, Maryland GovPics
$150 million Amazon fulfillment center near Grand Rapids will be built on fast-paced 22-week schedule
The warehouse will be Amazon's fourth in Michigan.
Courtesy Faraday Future.
June 15, 2018 | Industrial Facility | BD+C Staff
Faraday Future selects GC for its 1 million-sf EV factory
Onsite construction has commenced in an effort to deliver the first FF91 by the year's end.
April 12, 2018 | Industrial Facility | David Malone, Associate Editor
'Next generation' biomanufacturing plant will be the first of its kind in the U.S.
The plant will be located in Rhode Island.
Courtesy Vision Real Estate Investment
90,000-sf industrial facility will add needed manufacturing space in West Michigan
Vision Real Estate Investment recently broke ground on the building.
Industrial Facility,Warehouses

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
• "Popcorn is a sponge that feeds you butter" (1/20)
Entry from March 03, 2010
"Throw the rascals out!"
Entry in progress—B.P.
A modern jocular variant is "Throw the Rascals In!"
Wikipedia: List of U.S. presidential campaign slogans
Turn the Rascals Out - 1872 anti-Grant slogan against the Era of Good Stealings
28 July 1872, New York (NY) World, pg. 1, col. 5:
Witness also testified to Judge Barnard saying he had driven one set of d—d rascals out of the State, and he would drive another.
American Sayings:
Famous Phrases, Slogans and Aphorisms
By Henry F. Woods
1945, 1949; 2008 reprint
"Turn the rascals out."
Charles Anderson Dana (1819-1897)
HORACE GREELEY, famous editor of the New York Tribune, was the candidate of the Liberal Republican Party for President in 1872, running against General U. S. Grant, the regular Republican candidate for re-election. Greeley's campaign was waged on the issue of the necessity for reform in the national administration, which under Grant had been marked by grave scandals, and the cry "urn the rascals out" was adopted as a party slogan.
The phrase was originated by Charles A. Dana, editor of the New York Sun, who had broken with Grant in 1869 and thereafter attacked his administration with exceptional bitterness. Although Dana's antagonism to Gran continued unabated, his support of Greeley's candidacy was not remarkable for any great fervor or force, and Greeley was defeated by Grant.
New York City • Government/Law/Politics/Military/ Religion • Wednesday, March 03, 2010 • Permalink


text:
Steve Nash Playing Golf Not A Big Deal
Steve Nash put up a video playing golf and caused a minor uproar in the Lakers' community, as the 40-year-old is out for the season with a back injury
By Shahan Ahmed	• Published November 6, 2014 • Updated on November 6, 2014 at 5:01 pm
"Do people not understand there's a difference between hitting a golf ball and playing NBA basketball?" A reporter asked Los Angeles Lakers' coach Byron Scott on Thursday.
The reporter was referring to a recent Instagram video Steve Nash posted where he hits a golf ball at a driving range (see below). The short grainy video was posted on Sunday, but it did not gain attention until after the Lakers had lost their fifth game of the season on Tuesday and had a day with no media allowed at practice on Wednesday.
Apparently, a day with no new Lakers' stories required reporters to go back a few days and point the finger at the 40-year-old Canadian who was already ruled out for the season.
"There are a whole lot of people who don't understand there's a difference between golf and basketball," Scott answered the inquisitive reporter with half a smirk. "Unfortunately, there's [sic] a lot of people out there like that."
Almost fell over. Glad my cheerleader was on hand.
A video posted by stephennash (@stephennash) on Nov 11, 2014 at 7:30am PST
Prior to the Lakers' final preseason game, the team announced that Nash would not play for the 2014-15 season due to his recurring back injury. By all accounts, Nash had been working his butt off throughout preseason to get right, but a decision that involved the Lakers' medical staff and Nash resulted in the future Hall of Fame point guard being ruled out for the duration of the 2014-15 season.
"The guy is hurt and can't play this year doesn't mean he can't enjoy himself or have some fun while he's going through rehab and everything else," Scott said.
Whether he is kicking a soccer ball, swinging a golf club or even shooting a basketball, Nash is not coming back to the Lakers. No amount of golf swings will bring Nash back to the team, and the man deserves to enjoy his life, which no longer includes playing professional basketball.
Swinging a golf club at the driving range or even playing 18 holes of golf are not comparable to playing in an NBA game.
No one has ever questioned Nash's work ethic or competitive spirit during his time in Los Angeles, and the decision to sit out the season had to be a difficult one for the Canadian. By the Lakers' account, the decision was made by the medical staff and Nash together. The decision to sit Nash was one that protected both the player and the team.
Scott concluded the conversation, "It probably doesn't look good, but Jesus Christ! I mean, relax."


text:
CongressMoves on Immigration Reform
Congress is scheduled to debate on major reforms to US immigration law in March 1996.
The Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to take up Sen. Alan Simpson's (R-WY) S. 1394 bill on February 29, and the full House is expected to debate the Immigration in the National Interest Act HR 2022 of Rep Lamar Smith (R-TX) the week of March 18.
The Simpson bill would reduce the number of immigrants admitted for employer/economic reasons from 140,000 to 90,000, and require US companies seeking immigrants to fill vacant jobs to pay foreign workers five percent more than the prevailing wage. In some cases, business would also have to pay the government a fee of $10,000 or 10 percent of the foreigner's salary, which ever is higher, to train Americans to fill the jobs.
Simpson's bill also modifies the system under which US employers can have admitted to the US non-immigrant foreign workers who temporarily fill US jobs. The US Department of Labor says that US employer applications for H-1B workers rose 82 percent between 1992 and 1994. Non-immigrant foreign workers are concentrated in California and Florida--an estimated 35 percent of the computer programmers in Silicon Valley were born abroad. Simpson's bill would cap the number of foreign H-1B workers at 65,000.
In urging swift passage of his bill, Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) asserted that "one-quarter of all federal prisoners are foreign born; ... one- quarter of legal immigrants are on welfare." The bill has 120 co-sponsors.
The Smith bill would enact new penalties for alien smuggling, build a triple fence along 14 miles of Mexican border, streamline asylum, and authorize another increase in the Border Patrol. The bill would eliminate immigration slots for adult brothers and sisters and most adult children of US citizens, while increasing the number of wives and minor children of legal immigrants allowed in legally each year. Legal immigration would be capped at 595,000 by 2002, down from 800,000 in 1995.
Businesses prefer the Smith version because it keeps the number of immigrants admitted for employer/economic reasons at 135,000 a year, and does not impose fees.
Most observers expect Congress to approve legislation that, inter alia, step up efforts to reduce illegal immigration by adding more Border Patrol agents and at least experiment with a system under which employers would be required to check whether newly-hired workers are eligible to work in the US. The number of legal immigrants would be reduced through the elimination of immigration slots for adult brothers and sisters of US citizens, offset in part by more immigration slots for the immediate families of immigrants in the US.
Opponents of immigration reform will first attempt to split comprehensive immigration bills into legal and illegal components, in the hope that separate bills can be tough on illegal immigration, but not drastically change the legal immigration system. Senator Simpson and Representative Smith countered efforts to split their bills by arguing that Americans want reductions in BOTH legal and illegal immigration.
Welfare. The Senate Immigration Subcommittee on February 6, 1996 held a hearing on Supplemental Security Income (SSI) usage by immigrants. SSI is a federal program that provides $25 billion annually in federal benefits that average $325 monthly to six million poor persons who are disabled or elderly. Since most US residents have US work experience, they obtain benefits from Social Security rather than SSI.
Under immigration law, immigrants coming to the US must prove that they have sufficient assets, or a US resident sponsor, so that they will not become a public charge in the US. In many cases, the US relatives of immigrants sign affidavits that assert that the US resident will provide support for the immigrant so that the immigrant will not need welfare.
Elderly. However, the courts have held that these affidavits of support are not legally binding, so that especially elderly immigrants with few assets, and no ability to earn a US income, apply for SSI despite the affidavits signed by their often adult children who promised to support them.
In testimony February 6, 1996, a Social Security Administration official testified that the number of noncitizens receiving SSI increased from 128,000 in 1982 to 738,000 in 1994. In 1996, one million resident aliens are expected to be receiving SSI payments totaling $5 billion, and they are expected to obtain an additional $9 billion in Medicaid payments.
US immigration law declares that aliens who become "public charges" within five years of entry are deportable unless the reason for their application for welfare occurred after their arrival. Many welfare programs have a waiting period during which newly arrived legal immigrants are not eligible for benefits--three years for SSI, five years for other programs.
Many non-US citizens apply for benefits as soon as this waiting period is up--25 percent of non-citizens receiving SSI applied in their fourth year in the US.
Simpson's bill would extend the period in which legal immigrants could not get SSI and other benefits from three to 10 years, which means sponsors of immigrants would have to promise to support their relatives for 10 years after their arrival in the US. Immigrants who received welfare payments for 12 months or more in any 60-month period would be subject to deportation.
Immigrants can become US citizens after five years, so some proposals in Congress would make aliens ineligible for benefits even if they became naturalized US citizens.
The US Census reported that, in an average month of 1992, about 34 million US residents --13 percent--were receiving benefits under one or more of seven programs--AFDC, General Assistance, SSI, Medicaid, Food Stamps, Federal or state rental assistance, and public housing. In calendar years 1991-92, the median duration of participation in these assistance programs was eight months, and the average recipient got $436 per month from AFDC/GA, SSI, and Food Stamps.
Almost two-thirds of the welfare recipients--20 million US residents--got assistance in each of the 24 months of 1991-92. About half of these long-term recipients got Food Stamps.
It was reported that the foreign born account for eight percent of households on public assistance and, because they tend to have larger families, they receive 14 percent of federal benefits. In California, foreign born account for 21 percent of the households and receive 40 percent of the benefits.
The US Census reported that about 13 percent of the nation's 4.2 million foreign-born mothers received Food Stamps in 1993, versus 15 percent of the 31.5 million US-born mothers. About one-fourth of all Hispanic mothers received Food Stamps, versus 13 percent of non-Hispanic mothers.
In 1993, 43 percent of refugees in the US received public assistance.
Asylum. One provision of both the House and Senate immigration reform bills would require foreigners to apply for asylum within 30 days of their arrival in the US. Currently, an estimated five percent of asylum applicants apply within 30 days of their arrival by completing an eight-page I-589 form.
The Clinton Administration opposes the 30-day limit. It argues that reforms already undertaken--doubling the number of asylum officers who hear claims to 325--cut the number of new asylum applications in half, to 53,000 in 1995, and 95 percent of the new claims filed are dealt with within six months--asylum applicants must wait six months for work permits.
Rep. Randy Tate (R-WA) has offered a bill that would make it impossible for any who has tried to illegally enter the US to enter as a legal immigrant. HR 2898, the One-Strike-You're-Out Immigration Act of 1996, has been embraced by FAIR, which says that it would give aliens a good reason not to try to enter illegally or overstay their visa.
"Bill to cut legal immigration comes under fire; foes want to split measure," Associated Press, February 28, 1996. Eric Schmitt, "Deep split on immigration curbs," Sacramento Bee, February 26, 1996; Jorge Banales, "Study: Immigrants in few US states," UPI, February 20, 1996. Sarah Jackson-Han, "Study adds fuel to political fire over US immigration," Agence France Presse, February 20, 1996. Marc Lacey, "Worker Verification Plan Provokes Intense Debate," Los Angeles Times, February 19, 1996. Ellen Davenport, "Bill would add to costs of hiring foreign workers," St. Petersburg Times, February 9, 1996. Gil Klein, "Congress Studies Legal Immigration," Richmond Times Dispatch, February 11, 1996. Celia Dugger, "Legislation poses peril to seekers of asylum," New York Times, February 13, 1996.


text:
You are at:Home»Campus»Faculty and Staff»Poinsettias on Sale at Hutson Horticulture Greenhouse
Poinsettias on Sale at Hutson Horticulture Greenhouse
By southeast on	 November 22, 2013 Faculty and Staff, Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics
CAPE GIRARDEAU, Mo., Nov. 22, 2013 – Holiday poinsettias are now for sale at the Charles Hutson Horticulture Greenhouse at Southeast Missouri State University.
Horticulture students have been working with 42 varieties of poinsettias at the greenhouse. The poinsettias were sent for this year's poinsettia trials by three leading breeding companies in the United States — Paul Ecke Ranch, Syngenta Flowers Inc. and Dummen USA Inc.
The companies sent the plants as rooted cuttings in August, and greenhouse staff and students have potted and grown them. Before the poinsettias went on sale, students at the greenhouse evaluated the plants and sent their analyses to each company.
"Seven of these varieties have not yet been released to the market for commercial production," said Denise Pingel, greenhouse manager.
An open house is scheduled for 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. Nov. 25 for people to "take a look at all the wonderful colors," according to Pingel.
Students, staff and faculty who show their Redhawks ID will receive 10 percent off their plant purchases. Beginning Dec. 2, hours are Monday-Friday from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. and Saturday 9 a.m. to noon. The greenhouse is closed on Sundays. The greenhouse is located at 1039 Bertling St. For more information, contact the greenhouse at (573) 651-2316.


text:
Robbers jailed
Muggers robbed two schoolboys in a subway after following them from a nearby shop.
Steven Kegg and Adrian Lithgow from Elswick trapped their victims, aged 15 and 16, by blocking both ends of the underpass close to Newcastle's Pink Lane.
Kegg snatched £30 cash and a mobile after the older boy was pushed up against a wall. Lithgow took a cassette tape from the 15-year-old, Newcastle Crown Court heard.
Both fled but were arrested after police studied CCTV footage.
Kegg, 20, of Bentinck Street, was sent to a young offender institution for two-and-a-half years and Lithgow, also 20, of Sovereign Court, for two years after the pair admitted robbery.