_— 33 tan. 
„ EE TE”ZS 


. 


o 
+ 


* X "2. 
* 9 1 


+ A 2 i 
„% 3% ny 
» 4 IR. 

1 1 - 


„ 


A 


— 


5 ' p a N OY 2 
, 2 . 1 


„ Ro 


- 
* 
pc 


a) 1 
PR 
. 


9 Te 2 "uy * 

” ws” & FAT 6, 
BAT —; bs Lg - . 
* * 


Br 
„ i 


o 
* * - 


* 


* 


ö 1 hs 
7 * 1 bs tp A 4 „ 
3 5 E 


82 


- we” 
| ACS SRI £7, 
. * 4 N. > IS, 7< 1 
* * < 5 »4$ 70 
* W * * 


IX. 
IL. 


* 
* N 
4 
„ 
* 4 
* 


"_ : 0 \ : : - 

1 a; a * 4 l . * by 

: N A : 1 { . N * 
— . , \ l . „ 2 41. . \ A - Þ 

b a Yy 7 v# 2 . \ l n 


1 
5 


r r dere. FT 2 4 CC. rs abby rows 
4&5 . * | 2 | F * Y / , 4 — . | _— IE — f . +; -” 7 | N — . - : % he 2 


1 oy 


. * 


= 


* 
3” 


„ 
a” 
*; 
« 
— * 
4 
„ * Nw rr 
DD 
4 N 
q 
„ 


| a * 
* . - _ * * . * mn : , ' ; 
— * 8 | 
: 0 | : 
- * - X 2 N | ; 
2 5 5 | 
— 4 - | ; | | | 
= 7 | 
+ 2 4 = - - ; g 
2 4 | | | 
— — * — - % | | | 


- 
— 


* 
» 
COR rac 


- 


— — — 2 


8 
in #44 
SHA: 0p rn r Ge 
* 


—— — = C0. K 2 

— = 5 * 
"x * N. 

ER, | : 


— 
* 
* * 
: 
3 
1 
e dee eee 


1 
1 
f 
w 
a 
) 
— 


- 
1 
* 
. 
\ 

* 
r * — 
i 
: 
4 


I 
> 
y 
45 


— 
* 
* 
3 

1 
4 
4, 


= 
* 
_ 
„ 
* 
5 
1 
F 
, 
1 
Nen 
* 
8 
a 
F: 


4. 
4 * 3 

* : , F | | | | | 
| - 2 * 1 * 

* 7 

| 1 

* x > . I & * 
r — | 2 | | 
1 — 8 


3 K : : 
* 
CS = 5 1 
F . A | 
4 Y 
. A : 
* = | 
- þ Tz . 


” -v « . a 3 | | | | 


2 pr Ig rr 


f 
of 


©, % 


> * ? * 82 . 3 


9 


— 


— 


ASSES: 


I (through the numerous avocations of thoſe to whoſe charge 
it was committed) having long been a matter of public complaint, it was 
recommended to the ſenior Proctor of the former year, immediately 
upon his entring his office, in April 1755, to be cautious in the nomi- 
nation of future Delegates; and, in particular, he was deſired to uſe his 
endeavonrs, upon the firſt vacancy, - to introduce a Gentleman to this 


- truſt, who it was preſumed might be induced to attend it. This the 
V EE Co oe ONT 08 


- 


2 


* 


- 


a 


by 15 ? 2 | * 
D e 
b en, , , et eo er Cong | . 1 | 
TURRET ne, T 0 8 5 | 1 
| Dr HUDDESFOR D's Obſervations, Ge. 
| SM g enn PD. + 22 bs a „ 46 #9 T6 Th 5 1 i I F | of | | 2 
R. HuppzsrorD, the late Vice-Chancellor, having made it his 
: endeayour, during the laſt Vacation, to propagate a ſtory much to 
the difadvantage of the Proctors of the former year; and having 
in his ſpeech to Convocation, 6th Oct. 1756, when his office of Vice- 
Chancellor expired, repeated the fame to the houſe ; they thought them 
ſelves now called upon to juſtify their per ſonal Conduct to the members of 
Conyocation, before whom they were accuſed; as they had in a former 
paper endeavoured to vindicate the Rights of their Office. - And therefore 
on the roth of October laſt, they circulated in the ſeveral colleges the 
following narrative in writing; which contained (to the beſt of their recol- 
lection) the whole of what had paſſed upon the occaſion ; and which, as 
it was a private tranſaction, and not much to the credit of the late prin- 
cipal magiſtrate of the place, (for whoſe office they have the higheſt 
reſpe&) they could have wiſhed to have buried in oblivion © 
” HE many abuſes, which had crept into the Univerfity-Preſs 


* 


_ - 


- . 4 * 


* 


- - 4 Sp — — » r uo mee Wt» a — 
* — 
. 


ately told the Regiſtrar, there was ſome. miſtake, for that he was only 


replied, that the Delegacies were one and the ſame, and always went to- 


bree Ne Walen why vi rig, 1 7 of the ch ng 4 111 
elegacy ob Accounts, 1 the Delet Facy 'of the'Prefs:** 57 lo N b | | i 7475 
On the 1 a of June, the Vice-Chancellor, at "St. Mary's, church before 
ſervice, applied to the ſenior ProQor, in the abſence of his collegue 35 . % 
and told him there were two Offices become vacant, the Delegacy of . 
counts, and the opts , of the Theater ; and. defired the.Proctor's- N 
concurrenq in promoting his ſuccelſion to Both, as one was. neceflary 
ſtep to the other. THis the Proctor Teadily promifed him ; he Delegacy _ „ 
of the Preſs being then never mentioned kf al, though the other Omces 
were; and the Proctor being then entirely ignorant chat the late Rector 
was one of thoſe Delegates. 

On the 23d of, June, a, eeting of the Heads Produrs | in this 
Delegates room, the Vice-Chancellor obſerving the junior Proctvr (whb 
came late) croſſing the area, ſuddenly went out of the room, ſto 
him at the door, and aſked his conſent that he might ſucceed.to al the 
late Rector's offices in the Univerſity. , The Proctor, thus ſuddenly at- 
tacked, only aſked him if he had obtained the concurrence, of: his brother- 
Proctor; _ the Vice-chancellor aſſuring him that he had, he cee 
leges that he thereupon / promiſed 2 e ale +... 

A Convocation. being appointed to be held in the Theater one Falte 
of July, the Vice-Chancellor gave directions to the Regiſtrar to prepare - 
the forms of nomination; who accordingly. prepared one for each ele- 
gacy, filled up with the Vice-Chaneellor's name, and delivered them to 
the ſenior Proctor: that metning in the Delegates, room: Who immedi- 


* 
* 


* 


engaged to nominate the Vice-Chancellor. to the Delegacy of e | 
and not to that of the Preſs.: 
On the breaking up of that aſſembly, the ſenior Proctor waited upon 
the Vice-Chancellor at his Lodgings, and explained to him of what na» 
ture he apprehended his engagement to be; and how impoſſible it was 
for him to conſent to the Vice-Chancellor's nomination, as a Delegate of 
the Preſs, by reaſon of his previous engagement. The Vice-Chancellor © 


gether. In anſwer to which the Proctor urged the diſtinct forms of nomi- 

nation; and. till infiſted that the-Delegacy. of the Preſs was never men- 

tioned to him by the Vice-Chancellor. The Vice-Chancellos faid, that : 
his words were © Both Delegacies; which (as he underſtood them to 272.3 
be one and the ſame) was obſerved to be a little extraordinary. But, at 

length, being informed who it was that the Proctor propoſed to recen 

mend, he then ſaid he would We his ken 


. 4 X 4 : - G 
> * + _ N < - | . q 0 511 > ö 2 
* = P * % * — > P * oy g = \ L F 5 - i + * 2 D \ 
f 8 > * d * * 2 F 6 
. 1 * ! _ - k . * N ? 
* * Va : . 
4 © 4 * P 4 , \ * 
r " * = p * , = * \ 4 l \ 
- 3 % 8. ba 
\ ws — * 1 
o ef _ "EIS | : #7 
* 
4 C 9 4 j 
# N * 1 
. « : - ot : 
* 


1 ez zenten Prodiog; POR as he. was into an ehen nee promiſe on 


. Aﬀurante that his collegue'was alſo engaged, thought it, however, 
,, neceſſary. to be releaſed, that, before be concurred in any other 


nomination ;- and! accordingly applied to the Vice-Chancellor at noon; 


who gave him a full, abſolute, and unconditional Diſcharge ; whereupon 


he conſented to nominate the perſon recommended by his brother Proctor. 


And, in the afternoon, ; with the unanimons el of the Vice-Chan- 

| cello? and Proctors,  and\ſabſequent approbation of the Houſe, the Vice- 
Chancellor was himſelf nominated a Delegate of Accounts, and took the 
. oath peculiar to that office; and the perſon propoſed by the ſenior Proc- 


tor being nominated a Delegate of the Preſs, the ſame oath was by miſ- 


take adminiſtered to him alſo; though he fince bath been permitted, not 
vi ſome oppoſition, to take 17 common oath of other Delegates. 


It is but juſtice to that gentleman to declare, that he was an entire 
ſtranger tothe whole of this tranſaction, and every ſtep leading thereto, 
till after the Proctor's conference with the Vice-Chancellor on the ſecond 
of July; and that he then declined accepting the truſt, till he was aſſured 
by the Vice-Chancellor i in perſon that he totally relinquiſhed his pretenſions. 

Thus much for the nominations of the ſecond of july; in conſequence 
of which- the Vice-Chancellor: was afterwards. eleced- a Curator of the 
Theater. 

On the 13th of july in the fame. year, another vacancy 1 in 
the Delegacy of the Preſs; by the death of the late Biſhop of Briſtol (Who 


vas a Delegate only of the Preſs, and ; t of Accounts) the public Libra- 


rian applied to A nag junior Proctor on the 1 5th (being the day on which 
the Judges arrived in Oxford) to be conſtituted a Delegate in- his room. 


Beſides: the motive of perſonal, friendſhip, the Proctor, being himſelf a 


Delegate in right of his office, was by this time thoroughly convinced” 
of the neceſſity of a more diligent inſpection of the Preſs; and thinking 
this truſt extremely proper for a gentleman in the Librarian's public cha- 
racer, he readily promiſed his affiſtance. And, as he had obliged the 


Vice-Chancellor in one of the former nominations, and his collegue in 
+. the other, he now hoped to be obliged in his turn, by as chearful à con- 


currence upon their parts, This be eaſily obtained from his brother 
Proctor the fame evening, at the time of their waiting on the Judges. 
But the term ending the ſame week, which diſperſed the ſeveral parties 
concerned, the further proſecution of the affair was neceſſarily deferred 
till after the long vacation. 

On the 22d of October, aſter cad the Bodleyan Accounts, the 


10 0 Proctor in the Per feen of his collegue and another gentleman, 


propoſed» 


4 4 © Los < 8 
8 2 by 
— — — 


ey _ ” 2 - 


N 


A — 9 


— 4 a 49 —ä n „ 9 „ — ᷑F—wöỹu r = rr 12. — —— 7M BL, » mM. 2 * 
— - n 1 = : K N — _ wn, os * % — 1 8 
— lo K wg - . — * . hs 
O - 


4,89; 


was #0 vacancy, the late Biſhop being no Delegate, fries the Vice-Chan- 
cellor, for the time being, had never Suftines to his nomination; (though 
the contrary a 
that, ſuppoſing his nomination irregular, ſtill the old weatny, made by 
Dr. Mathe r, muſt continue; he then objected that the Number of Dele- 


gates Was 15 large, and that it would be proper to take this F e ot 


of reducing them. Which was all that at that time. 


About a 1808 afterwards, or more, in the apodyterium of the Con- | 
vocation-Houſe, the Vice-Chancellor made his firſt” application to the 
Proctors to be nominated to the preſent vacancy; then alledging, for 


the fi time, that as he had waved his pretenſions before, he thought 


he had now a right to it. Upon the Proctors repreſenting their abſolute f 


engagement to the Librarian, he then roundly told them, that it had 
been ufual to nominate only Heads of Houſes to this Truſt; that the De- 


legacy of the Preſs was always conſidered as proper Compliment to the 
Vice-Chancellor for the time being; that he had conſulted his Brethren 


who were already Delegates ; and that they by no means approved of 
the Librarian; wherefore he ſhould never conſent to his appointment. 


Whereupon the Proctors promiſed to take what he had ſaid into confide- 
| ration ; and they immediately went into the Houſe, _ : 

The Proctors finding a negative power thus unreaſonably threatened to 
be exerted, ſet about (with the afliſtance of their friends) to examine into 


it's validity and foundation ; and, after a long ſearch, having fatisfied 
themſelves that it was neither warranted by reaſon, ſtatute, nor ancient 


cuſtom, they, about the middle of March, 1756, waited on the Vice- 
Chancellor at his lodgings ; and told him, they alſo had conſulted heir 


friends, who thought the Librarian a very proper perſon ; and as they 


were engaged to him, they were ſorry they could not oblige the Vice- 


Chancellor. He then again afferting his negative, they very reſpectfully 


| hinted their doubts concerning it; upon which he diſmiſſing them ſome- 
what abruptly, they left with him a paper containing the Wenn * | 


which thoſe doubts were founded. 
The Proctors ſtill deferred their nomination, which they now appre- 


hended to be the right of their office, being unwilling to come to an 
open rupture; and hoping that their reaſons would in time have ſome 


Weight with the Vice-Chancellor, and induce him to lay afide his oppo- 
ſition. An expedient was alſo propoſed by one of their common friends, 


to end the diſpute without either fide's ſacrificing their real or A 


* See Dr. * n p. T. 3 
rg 5, 


epd the Librariad to the Vice Chancellor; who! re dle 1 . 


in the regziſter) however, upon its being repreſented a 


ah, rights tung be opinlen of the -Univerſity unn 10 ch rule 


oP 
their office, ac 


told them, he had no other objections, than what would lie again 


1 85 3 ke cannot be politive which. 


| in ö 


thn 


ſoribed in ro Pray Fit. 10. Sect. 2. F. 2.) and making anew ſtatute 
r the direction of the Preſs, as a to have been originally intended 
Tit. 18. Sect. 5.; But this was rejected by the Vice-Chancellor, And, 
after repeated Conferences, he ſtill refuſing to acquieſce, and giving no 
artery reaſons for his ſo doing, they, about a week before they left 


Librarian in public, unleſs he could mention any well founded objections 
againſt bim; in which caſe they would immediately drop him. fey 
* any other perſon who.was not a Del of Accounts; for the Heads 
* of Howes who were Delegates of the Preſs had come to a reſolution, 
* not to admit a perſon to be a Member of one dg aaa chat was not 

"5: 2008 Member of the other.” 
. N. B. The junior Proctor does not perfe | dl this laſt 
. . ſpeech of the Vice-Chancellor; but remembers that the reaſons 


he 4. 4 againſt admitting the Librarian, were ſome objections 
by either the Heads of Houſes, or the Delegates of the 


1 this, after a negotiation of above fix nth; carried on with all | 
imaginable reſpect on their ſide, the Proctors, in juſtice to themſelves, 
their ſucceſſors, and the body of Doctors and Maſters whom they had 
the honour to repreſent, found themſelyes under the diſagreeable neceflity 
of exerting their dormant right; and accordingly 'on the 28th of April, 
1756, the day when their office expired, the ſenior Proctor, with the 
concurrence. of his Collegue, did in; ol Convocation nominate the 
Librarian to this Truſt. 

In taking this ſtep they have not, as "they truſt, invaded the juſt pri- 
vileges of che Houſe : under the pretence of which it is now endeavoured 


to eſtabliſh a Negative in à ſingle 1 7 They did not examine 


into the foundation of this Ne gative, till aſter an actual refuſal to take the 


opinion of Convocation upon a. Gentleman of acknowledged abilities, 
and one whoſe diligence in a former truſt recommended him to this 


nomination. But having, in conſequence of this refuſal, informed them- 


ſelves more fully with regard to the rights of their office, they thought 


it their duty to acquaint the Doctors and Maſters with the reaſons upon 
which: they had acted, by papers diſperſed in the common rooms *, 


I N:B. He hath ſince qualified bimſelf by taking i in the firſt perſon the * of Oe 
foe p * See Dr. Hjs Pumphlet, P. 5 ; 


* 


oe containin g 


uainted him with their final reſolution to . _ 


= -— — AN — = 


| "+. 4 is" IT 
— —_ 
= _—— — = 


*. — . 
— . _ 


— 
1 2 . 
yo * 
. —— —— ws i 


— 2 


— 


* "_— 


— 
a — 3 


A——_— vv. 
— — — ————ů ů ˙ *˙ — SS a * — 
Re = mn — * * 2 * — 
2 _ a | 


= -+ — 


. ” 
N 2 * 
8 * © 


yy — 
r 
* * 
= » — — 


 livered to the Vice-Chancellor fix weeks before. And . 
Lecbunt, and W in front che ſtile of % tbe Proffors. , 


apprehend to be a ſufficient tefutation. 
performance conſiſts of either arch and facetious drollery (ſuch as, the moft 


# Br paper Writer, page iv. Skill in the Law, page xi, ' The no—De- . 
legate, page vii, &c.) of angry and bitter Words (fach as, mare crafty 


_. more upon t 


| firſt reducing them to a regular ſeries and method, tiſe want of which is 


— — c_—— — 8 
Freer — 
—— er . r — — 


| ſion in diſpute, and then their own argument. I he queſtion was this, 


NATION OF THE PROCTORS ONLY ? The affirmative whereof is fop- 
ported by this ſhort argument. | FF . 


3 4 1 
Nane 
STE YT 
a 


% * N | * * 
ws #4 . * # i 
* F * . S * [ * : * *- 
- 1 \ \ » © K 
7 x Va. 
i 5 r DIY %e 
- pf f n ' * - = 7 "EN * 
\ | $ - 1 * 0 , s . -, 
R 4 Fa . pro ” 1 N * * 
' | 8 i 
A 4 5 © N * wm 0 ; 
. 7 2 ” . = * 


* 


5 & / | SE 5 6 | 

N = 2 49 
1 #- 
— N = : 1 | 

| ng in ſu ery 5 
7 8 . » | 4 4 55 
5 * N. 7 1 

F * 

| F 


0 


+7 ? 7 x 
voy 
1 ve 
9 F 
| * 
ö 


r 


2 ' : _ g 1 * 

L 13 N p BY. | 4g)" 4 oy 7 - . - 3 

anonymous,” 4. i 11 
Y o 0 1 : "> 8 1 . * „ N n ak 
G- / VT j I 0 1 
* 


- _ Since the circulation of this Narrative, viz. on the 2gth. of Oober last, 15 
after-ſix' months deliberation, certain printed Obſervations Baye mache their © 


appearance, ſigned by Dr. HuppesorD, as Vice-Chancellor; and cherer 


fore, it is preſumed, beating date the 10th of September. Theſe Obſetya- 44 
tions are addreſſed to the Heads of Houſes, who are deſired: to lay hem 
before their reſpect 1 


ive ſocieties. And as this long ſtudied performance is 

ſuppoſed by. ſome Gentlemen to bear an appearance of argumept, the 
Proctors hope it will not be thought improper. for them to ſubmit to 
the ſentiments of, the Houſe, as carly .,as poſlible, What they humbly 


— = - 


Lo 


| min ̃ĩ ents, TY - 
But, firſt they beg leave to premiſe, that though much Kn. 


ingenious Paper Writer, page i. The Jagacious Paper Writer, page xvili. 


on them, than even in the. nar of the Olrverian government, 
page x. The pretending ſelf-fwearing Delegate, page xvi. Glaring a 
groundleſi Innovations, — Difingenuous prac 9 1 "of Seed order, 
and legal authority, Diſturbers of the public peace, —1 mies of the Um 
werfity, page xvii, &c.) yet the late Proctors aſſure their readers, that 
they ſhall leave him in full and unenvied poſſeſſion of all fuch ingenious 
raillery ; only reminding him, that this is not the uſual way of conduck- ; 
ing an argument among gentlemen, n 4 

His obſervations, or arguments, or Whatever elſe they may be ſtiled, 


ſhall, now be fully ſtated,” and, they truſt, as fully anſwered'; after 


e e/fions, page ii. Ar tient abſolutely falſe, page v. Taking 


- 


frequently no ſmall ſupport to a lame and feeble cauſe, 


— 


In order to this, they muſt beg leave very briefly firſt to ſtate the que - 


WIAETHER DEELGATES OF THE PRESS ARE IN THE ABSOLUTE NOMI- 


o , 
"78 .. 
3 
27 "= 0" 


.C 5 4 8 11 ; 
: o £ q 4 +] + — * 
1 - Sa 


- 
" ä 
1 © i 3 
— : 
* W, 1 5 7 © : — 1 
1 1 £8E. A | | 8 
- [4 : - 4 5 1 3 Tx off 7 : ; 
- . * 1 ; q * a 7 s „ , 
4 - 9 * 7 4 4 4 N 
, 4 - - >. ö . 
- R , | I 3 5 
4 - „ 9 
— A F - 
. 


W * * 7 * Y TL ba n 4 P 4 
9 18 N 2 SD * * * * T 
* A AN - 3 V * 9 . N. * * * 4 » * 7 a CY *. 
en 1 59 / 4 5 * ** 14 * - þ FJ 4 ' 
% . el 4 * / 5 y y Js A * 1 5 . 8 
1 . einn * 222 8» | LY # F 
& en 0 5 W. = 4 | \ 
* 4 F o " * 'Þ « » Er A * a N 
N *þ. 2 l nr. 85 % 
0 5 y * 4 
N + "> 1774 ö * 
Fe * 1 ö 0 7 4 7 
* - . e 4 5 ” U d 
| FE * 
6. * "Fi: k 
3 < < >. . «1 I PR 
ow 9 7 . 
a * \ © a «2 " 17 c 
0 * * * 7 4 * 
2 1 4 5 : N ; 4 * * 
! | . - 
* 7 pl a : i 5 
. i o 
| a * N 4 p 1 1 ** * , 
Ky 14 Al FI eee ee 1 etage 
*. 


tutes, are in the a abſolute nomination of the Froctors only, In 


| Dro f th dar ot ee toon that green role... 
Therefore | 


agent the Pref are inthe adſolat nomination of the Proc- 
tors only. by FD LECT ISAS! * I . ail 


O * * : 5 F I of 7 
®” ..0 — s wy. : 8 1 1 5 
1 4 = * 9 


nd ee whereof is included the following G 
af 2 n * k KEEP | FE — 9 727 


* Fier ProrostrION. Xl 

7 Helges, 5 the general rule 9 the Statutes, are in de abſolute 
nomination of the Proftors only. of 4 
Too prove which they appealed 0 Tit. 1 17. . 4; 83. to Tit. 10. 
$8: $7: and to the practice of the Univerſity in all general Delegacies. 
| "| $9: oben meg ĩͤ thor two more 


53 | -Badoks overs rental; I 
7 e Ns {meh Delegates: 1. ANNUAL eee. 


13 3 to "i nominated Prottors, and, it may be, approved by 
the 2. STATED A e of AccounTs; 75 be nominated by t 
Vice. 3 and Prottors, and approv * the Houſe, 3. Occa- 
sto AT, or GENERAL, Delegates ; fo WY" abſolutely nominated oy the 


Prodlors only. ' 
This they proved by Tit. 21, Seck. 20. compared with the Statute 
we 1 met | 
a hl N Tub e, Lett, FN Kod 


Bengel, of the Przss are not reducible to either of the two Rok lifes; ; 
and therefore muſt belong to the third, vis. OccastonAr, or GENERAL 
77 2 5 as ſuch are not excepted from the * rule, laid down 

ropofitron.  . 
10 fe this they appealed to the plain grammatical ſenſe, and ob- 
vious ; nltraction the ſtatutes ; and alſo to the practice of the Uni- 
ty, with regard to the Delegates of the Preſs, as it appears in the 
. Regiſters; eſpeciaHy thoſe which are neareſt the an; aa hf 
elegacy was originally inſtituted. > - 

The reader will cafily perceive that if theſe three Propoſitions. bin be 
ſupported, in all their material branches, the affirmative of, the queſtion 
is clearly and indif N e. 


ks x iy 


i G ? oy 


7 *. © "7 


N N 
8 _ A ” 
to 


* 
3 
2 4 


EO 


* 2 14 
111 | * , 
* Am 0 
- 


o 
. 


Sr W a 6g} 6 | 


gh ty n ATE amt 


te Wp er {149g n 


eee Tur FIST. The Prodtors hive ae — 
a new and moſt unſtatutable power. (pi). ene 


- Reyiy | leis ſurely moſt unfortunate thus to "OWE at BG 
Ws begin with a Feritio M k by roundly TOR! dhe very dl 


in queſtion, . Shot i 


nt" N | $ $2.6: $4534: 45 (4444 N 1 it . bids $ 


Onsesv. 2. The Proftors 5 no right to propoſe 5 ballen in 
Convocation; becauſe Min f Vi ce-Cancellarii Ar e FN aut 


frogits permith fas We (P.! iv. v. II. vi. Wa 4 


the Houſe ow: agreed that 4 Delegacy ſhould 
merly the ſole cigh of the Proctots. 1% name: 
legacies; and remains ſo by our preſent. Statutes, e 


appoin 
ſent, that a Delegacy 


Zang. 

Dr. H. has miſapprebended the Proctor's meaning, and waſted 
Paper 3n in diſproving what was nevet afferted ;-viz.! at the Proctors may a 
_ delegate 


61 os tA THEN een 


Rubi w. It is 8 chat they 5 
aſſert they had. "They aller, chat; before: any Neige 
ted, de Vice: Chancellor mialk get " dich Houle 


on- 
be named, to whoſe care ſuch, or ſuch, buſineſs 
ſhall be committed. What: they contend for is, (ke, p. v.) that when 


he appornted,...it was for- 
the Delegates. Ga all De- 
e OR Nv ng . 
caſes excep ted. or want ne on cen 

„ and nominating the ipdividual Dele 


ſelves: Whereas they only . ſuppole,”! that the Houſe haying prey 
committed the care of the Preſs to a Delegacy in 166, (or if. Dr. 
pleaſes in 1633, ſee 9 45 it belonged to their office to name per- 
ſons originally upon that cy and, as vacancies ſhould ha Pe 835 
ſubſtitute others in their rg Min any ſubſequent 7 

ſent whatſoever, Which claim of e is ee N 8 5 YH, 
Hina charges. ens WH, in p. i. I. 4. ach 


It is an aſſertion abGotutely £ IA < the bose af "I 
a [geversl, . occaſional] ES atutably 
re to perſons let the par; without 0 nn 


n 


44 


the bufineſs of printing to perſons ſelected or nomnated by 1. 
I 4 N 


OnsxRv. 3. 


l 75 


ty 14 Mat 1 


| * tors 10 e 
for it; for they 0 never made it. "Thy 6 claim the * of naming, 


—_— — 


Tv 


— — 


F 1 17 
| . And indeed, if dend it not in al | 
inſtances, (etoept in the o only extepted;) there is no; material dif- 
le eee Delegates, which, is the fe- 
wms er den ole conſtitution, and the new proviſion for naming; Dele- 


"exclude" the uta fr forum Procurateram, For theſe, it is univer- 
; yt allowed, are ws be nominated by the Yice-Charicellor, Land Proc- 
tors, and approved by che 'Fioufe; © So chat here ate three negatives. 
And 10 005 We geber ottiiarionr of Alf Delegates, (fays Dr. H.) is to 
7 by. the Proctors.—and approved by the Me- Chancellor, and the 
Houſe. 80 that here ate the ſame three negatives alſo. According to 
this doctrine the compilers. of our preſent ſtatutes gave Wen a need- 
leis trouble, to preſcrihe a ne form of nomination in one 
which had enacly the ſame effect as the old. Lis in every eher. 725 


AN Fenn 11 $4; ** 


O renn. 4. But 40 is gratis didum "by, Mr. Paper-Wikter that any 
er Delegacies,.. beſides, thoſe. of Accounts, were before: our . preſent 
ſtatutes in the arbitrary nomination of the Froctots, (p. I. J 


i RerLy. One reaſon, among others, for Alerting it, is, rg our 
prefent ſtatutes declare in general, that this right; * penes Prurmutores eſſe 
confuevit. Tit. 10. 491 nd if Dr. H. will conſult the Regiſters pre- 
ceding Fins che ſtatutes, find it the uniform prackice in all Delegacies; 
y in two occaſional Delegacies of Appeals inter Jones at Ballard, 
24th June, 1632. Aud inter Ballard et Jones, 19th July, 1632. And 
in; another |; precedent 140 years older, in an Appeal by Dr. Uſe to 
f S zoth October, 1492: from hence we We Hr + the 
inter fe dite practice to have been the Kane 


— 


| an . The conflitution of the Uni er {bien the. ratification 
| of our- preſent body of Statutes is nothing | to e purpoſe. Theſe; are 
| ien, ouly lee have each of us Aire to cee chem. (p; 1.)- 


Rib. The ancient. conſtitution of the Univerlity.. is fi uently the 
| beſt key for opening the reaſon of a modern Statute; eſpecially of a Sta- 
tute Which, like the preſent, declares. the right of the Pro to. be 
founded upon cuſtom. * Delzgates nominandi jus penes Procuratores efſe 
consvevir,” And it, is N that the 9 ſhould be called our 
2 rule, ba-. the Ave oath referred to is couched in theſe terms, 
a ad na. Staruta, Privilegia,” & ConsverubInes bujus 


7? 


| "s TOES | | "Ours ancient Wes n or E , 


* 
W 


tes of Accounts by Tit. 18.” ect. 2. § 7. which' is expreſsly calculated 


t ho een 
on, unleſs where it is altered 
OCuſtoms indeed (of which we ua hear 


tion, but is equivalent tO. OP FERRE de DARE 
becauſe it is applied not ny to Delegates in quibuſcunque negatiis, but 


regard to Delegates; when ſuch reſtriftion is no Where 


"Tn 15 110 i 
end to Kane 


ben wen in contradiction to the Statutes, arcallowed to de of no validity. 


' Onerxv. 6. The word, var, does not fgnify an abſolute noming- | 
MU1 APPROBANDOs; 


alſo to ach in can llationum, n latter * are. e 
craftily fairly ſuppr fea. (P. 9 . 


Rxri v. The Statute here lays down the ad e RO e Pro. 
curatorum munus eff Delegatos necnon ces 3 which imports as 
abſolute a nomination as can be created by words; and, if by other parts 
of the Statutes, that abſolute ſignification is expreſoly reftrained with re- 
gard to Judices, it does not therefore follow that it is alſo reſtrained with 
: nor 
can craft be imputed to the Proctors, for omitting the word ces 
in this e Firſt, becauſe they did it 1 for the Hook 
or hyphen, between the words negotrrs and dare, as well as between of 8 
and Delegates, confeſſes that there are words omitted: Secondly, becauſe 


they have mentioned in the two next ſucceeding Paragraphs, the preſent 


method of appointing thoſe Judges, as an exception to this general rule, 


in the word! e | 


' Onsexv, 7. There is a laxity of expreſſion i 


| which will but poorly ſupport. itſelf againſt the more determinate and 


forcible N IHIL PROPONT, AUT SUFFRAGIIS PERMITTI FAS EST, (p. il i.) | 


 RevLy, Here again we muſt remind Dr: H of the di iſtinction between 1 
propoſing a Delegacy, and nominating Delegates; and of his friend's very 
juſt rule of conſiſtency, (p. 11.) For, if the Vice-Chiticelior: and the 
Houſe have reſpectively a Negative upon all Delegates, the Proctors right 
of Nomination will dwindle to nothing: But, if the Maar rg 10 
firſt to propę , and then the Houſe to conſent to a Delegacy ; and, after- - 
wards, the: sto nomi nate the Delegates, this conſtruction will re- 

concile all apparent einen hut ſurely, in the preſent caſe, there 
cannot remain any laxity of expteſſion in the word 'NominanDI, when 

it is ſo preciſely explained, afterwards, by the words pro arbitrio Procu- _ 
ratorum defignart. (See Tit. 10. Sect. 2. „ \ \ $6533 


| Onsxxy. 8. The Negotia are to be delegated. Air "OBE 3: and that, . 


SELECTS Hominibus, not $ELIGENDIs ; Which therefore requires the 
propoſal of the TEND; * the conſent of the Houſe, after the 
nomination, (p. ii.) 8 REPLY, 


yy —— 


* 


"Tax 


_ the Br 
7 By A 
a 72 ſaid that the tenſe of the participle implies, that the act of the 
Houſe in delegating the buſineſs muſt be blenden And yet the Judices 
feletti among the Romans (of whom Tully thus ſpeaks, pro A. Cluentio 
43. Pretores debent optimum 


were appointed ſubſequent to that reference, like our Juries, Aſcon. in 
Ferrem, I. 6. And there is ſurely no abſurdity in ſuppoſing a buſineſs to 


be firſt referred to a /e{e#7 Committee, and that Committee be appointed 


afterwards 5 45 is every day 8 Practice! in the Houſe of Commons, 


| - Onseny 9. Iris not a little ſurprizing, that the Proftors ſhould be the 
N Repreſentatives of the Houſe, while the? Houſe 1 is fitting. (p. ü.) 


Bert. This ma y poſliby he been 
nation of the Prodtors is, repreſentatively, 


Nomination of the Houſe; 


the Proctors being formerly choſen by whole Univerſity, and now by 


the ſeveral Colleges in rotation. And the oonjecture i is certainly plauſible, 
that the Nomination of Delegates was originally in the Houſe at large, 
but was afterwards veſted in the Proctors (as Repreſentatives of their Con- 
ſtituents) to prevent the confuſion which might ariſe from continual po- 
pular Elections by the whole Houſe: However, the Proctors have built 


nothing upon this conjecture, nor even inſerted it in their 1 ; ching 10 


on more certain foundations.” - x 


"We 10. It is bey ond Dr. Es 1 I Fehr are 


in effect delegated by 1 Houſe, when two of the three conſtituent parts 
are excluded. from Ld _ in e or eee the A 


o 
(pa iii. r 
Se 1550 | "34 $4254 && a> ; 


Rert v, Dr. H 8 1 1 his own conan the Ne TA 
are to'be delegated per Domum, (ſee Obſery. 8. ) but that the Homines. 
are to be ſelected by another hoe. 


8 Obexkv. 11. When the buſineſs is propoſed by the Vier Chancellor, 
or with his conſent, - but not otherwiſe, the Procter have by cuſtom the 
right of nominating the perſons to whom the Houſe may delegate the bu- 
ſineſs ſo propoſed, if the other conſtituent, parts of the Convocation ſo 
| pleaſe: and in this the, Vice-Chancellor' 793 as well as that of 

* . is again prevalent, (p. iv. jos ) | n 


9 1 


„Been This bs n Bebe ay ow. And/ by. the; tes. 


tical nicety the Statutes are guilty of. a ſoleciſm in empowering | | 
octors . ee isse ros; whereas, had Dr. H. directed the . 
it hould clearly have been DELEGANDos, However it is allowed 
„H. that this Gledtion is the act of the Proctors only; but then it 


IS Lre ros JUDICES REFERRE”') | 


ed to ſhew, that the Nomi- | 


x 


g 'E 
L134. *. $3 * in 


#3 41e +43 


"$514 & © $0304 34 | ni 


Onan , 12. The Delegates muſk, be, approy by the Houſe: Why 
elle. are. they PAO US SR PRI. fl en a iin Wi, 


N "REPLY, Beabſe © att” co-operating With it Matte, ath fo or. . 


gained it, for the ſake of public notoriety ; in the ſame N is hath - 


alſo ordained the Nominations of the Maſters of the Schovls, and he / 


Pro-Proctors to be there made, Tit. 17. Sect. 4. f. 2. Aud yet the 
Chancellor and Houſe hath not yet ene 


concutrence Qt; the Vice- 


7 1 F "4% 3 bs : } EL I-48 + 
neceſſary to, theſe, nene 1: en et ie 


* 


#7 


* 


Occaſional; each of wine h'i 
the manner of their a 


ſorts of Delegates, and ae with ire only. 11 1 2 on 


"Raney: Which of theſe diſtributions: 1s: ade mn 
ns. In the mean 5 rel it 18 


mark, that the names and number of Claſſes, 
may be ranked, is of little importance. 


from the following Obſervatio 


T0 encounter. ie Secenb Paogoeriioniane:urged,.” 
5 Dinh 13. eee. kinds, Stated or 


HS A 4 * s 


Ft 45+ 7 ; . 


eies; "all different n 


14 


under which the Delegates 
Queſtion: in 


For the 


principal 
debate is not, whether the Delegates of the Preſs are ſtated, or occaſional, 


Delegates; but; whether they are - excep 


Nomination. A Delegacy- may be ſtated, 


rule; if no ſtatute directs the contrary 3 
ſional, and yet have a 


ted: from the general rule of 
and yet fall under the eee, 
and a Delegacy may be oc. 


peculiar rule of Nomination, if a particular ſtatute 


ſo orders it, This will be ſeen. more at large hereafter, At preſent how- 
ever widely Dr. H. may! ms e I 1s LON buſineſs to e _ 


bring him back. 


? 


U. Ft. *4 4 An 1 a 


= 


= - 
A 


QBsERv, 14. Stated nn ate, 1. e or Judges of Appel 


who ate called Stated Delegates: and the . 7. F 


of e [4-4 M.) 5 


i 44. £T+: {| f 


RvbLy. It is not remembeted thist Judges of Appeals are. -where 
; called e Wade . n are thts hs 


& 


or ns 3 


F 
n 2. 
A *" K BY wy 5 


1 


Ns 


mh o# 
»*) 4 LE '# a a We add; of * 0 2 ** 
Wen Ld EA Ts 


aq 


4 PO 7 | 
4 TA ot an? 4." N * 


4 enter ny: 


oy 


* f SF. G * 
* Nite 3 TY 


8. 4 9 r 145 ASL r 


— * 


+ 


* 


Pp IIS 


| 6K. 


— 


i \ : p 65 4 | 
4 . "Es , o Fo £-% | 35 * 7 7 4 s 7 . 4 4 5 $7 "43 Ly $7.1 4 
* 7 # 7 1 * | \ : - 'S 35S [ 
' - . G : q - — 4 * 
* _ ”* 185 | '3 l ” 
4 . * ” 8 - Y 4 ; 4 i 4 p 0) ö 4 
* - \ \ K 
1 f x ä 1 | . 5 
* + 4 1 p ; 
SH x. - 5 4 * 
1 n 1 * : - 
* ol * | 1 . 
p A 16 
p - £ , 
. 8 VS. 
Fy of f : 
y - * = s \ 4 
- s . oh N 1 x 
p Tx + WG + 
* Fuſs Godt f3 $4; 72.35 18 
4 l K + % t- 8 94 4 », R 1 
* __ 1 4 
1 + Qs | * 7 ec 
* * jp 1 5 


tion of the Proctor own, or of their friends with whom they 
 viſed,,, They arevinformed; $ that the Civil Law dwells much on diſtine- 


tions of this feng nd for which they are referred. to Dr. 


Taylor's Gui Lau, 6 Wich che more material, if we con- 


der that this wg rl icy to legal ue and that the 


whole tile, 4. . | with the aflita 
"ou Hip. . 338. n 1 155 75555 05 J 7652 2 


N. % I 5. The J Tull 10 85 ene are, L. or Se hs to be 
named by the Paton, 110 ap n by the Hout. 2. Thoſe of Non 
vocation, to. bs hätned 'by the ProEtors, and approved by tht Howſe. 


Rik. , ee pure of ia ing be to, but the 
laſt dauſe is rather too It hath been: much doubted, whe- 
ther the conſent of the Houle is neceflary, by the ſtatutes, to the Dele- 


gates of Convocation; ſince the word, ſimiliter, may as properly be re- 
ferred to the axtent of their juriſdiction, as to the form of their 5 1 


ment : eſpe 
(which Dr. H 


reſtored to its proper plac 
minent; for een ten and prout will be found to be antecedent and 


relative. F ee have, in their Paper, been cautious. of deter- 
mining any thing upon this point; as it ſeemed to be both dubious and 
immatesial-t6 the preſent question, With regard to the nomination of 
ſtated Delegates of Acpounts, bath parties ſeem to agree; though, 
with: ue to the OT 1 enn or. PAD die, 
See N bigs 1] fb 75 


e 16. The e e by a N Sect. 57. OR ne- 


1 ſpoſed, for reaſons. beſt known to himſelf) be 


T7 


een ee e 
Arx. Ia what part of theſe Oo bigs ont or in 


thai probation ? Not in the nomination ; for that is given up in p. 11 
ond 7 it were het, pet the words, propons, aut Ju » oh fermitti, could 


115 in the apptobation: for 
18 neither a 
40 at 950 'babeatur,” 


; relate. io 4 nomination... Nor, 
54 4 e if noceſſa 


* — wn ey 


wann PUR 11 

(xs Rep 2 45 . <a, Bot it m marin in the = 

e tikr hes ene Nov"is this e fubtile dee 
e 


cial 1 the ent e out ſupra contefſum gu, 
e, immediately after the words audzant & deter- 


Sate in ach af 654613 17 Wy J n both of no 


tree nor a 


2 * . 
* 


* 2 12 * 
— — 33 * 


— —u—œ 


IR — — ESETEY - 


- 
— 
ww N 
* — 


Ons ²—— we We 
— CIR 


* — — 


2 — 
2 
—— 


-—_— —IUj — — —̃——̃ ̃¶ f — 
x - 
. 


1 
y 
[1 
6 
| 
47 
0 


Dee is acknowledged; 


in this ſubſtitution, | their Joint concur in 0 
dered unneceſſary. * Does it therefore follow, * it is equalh 
and equally. unneceflary, in all? But by he Way, 


nien the Delegates. ... 


preſcribed number, nor deſcription. of; perſons, . 25 „ e el 


_ $10NAL Deleg 
ant bout, as the 


% 


- adit 


to 3 ot anion l 8 no ppl  hads from the 
_ Chancellor's Court, here the Vice Chancellor ſometimes does, and. al- 
| ag may, ii gry unleſa to ſuch judges a5 be. himfplf. (hall ink 
8 to be a | es In 22 bY Te A * 1 7 8 2 8 HEM * N Neu 


+ „ 9 l 5 85 | 


. I > In the lübetirution 40 this 


ä pai to the Wie Cheb 8 ee (S. i 5 is 55 Mm _ . f 18 9 55 'Y 


-Revies ThE Vice-Chanicellor' 9 \uuthority in " fubSiruting” to this 
ia: Ny ola expreſs : words.” , But it does 

not therefore follow; that be has the ſame authority in nom;inating; where 
it is not given. The authority of the Prodtors is * exprefaly curtailed 
„in this inſtance, den- 


ly curtailed, 
ſee Obſery. 10. 

we may, obſerve, that Dr, H. can now comprer „chat Delegates 
ſo ſubſtituted are, in effect, delegated. by the Houle, when one and an 


half of the three conſtituent mu may a aa from chuſing, or 


Fa, e — '> * 3 ih 2 5 1755 . # 203.45; $1 


On 18. A third fort of Delegates (omittte "by the Puper- writer) 
are thoſe for tranſacting occafional bulinels at a diſtance," Thele have 


3 7 


2 8 Fen Uh ns T's 


Rzery. It was always imagined; that the term of Occa. 

would comprehend as well — Delegates 
occafional Delagates within the Vdiverſity' Both feem 
to be diſtinct 15 of the ſame genus © But if Dr. . is determined to 

make them diſtinct genera” he is dich They muſt however have 
the ſame qualifications, as to Degrees and Faculties, as other tes; 
for they are not excepted from the general Rube, either in this point, or 


: in that of nomination. Vet, wer told, Ft 1 * . N 7 


OnßsxRv. 19 That theſe extra PACE are (p. 18) 40 Under 
their charge, or (p. vi) are commiſſioned, ad Man um V. Caucrilarii & 
Procuratorum. The Vice Chancellor's part in n this "£40 
poeds therefore. no further diſtinction. ee e CIs 


LT 
„ * . 1 A, 1 * > 
\ * * 


Rrrtv. Dr. Es, . comprehenſion i is here again app ily ge 3 he 
Ober. 10.) and he can noꝶ cohceive. that Perſons may be de —— by 
the Houſe, When the body of the Houſe has no 1 in ch 
"IE. them: "Nay | even,” ou E without their being con 


* of 7 % Wl. * 85 1 $ 
of . 0 9 


"i 2 4 „ 7 
ene on * bungen. This wer indeed, if it exiſts, tranſcends "RY 
Prerogative Royal.' "Tor i It is faid, that the King himſelf cannot ſend the 
ws { Mmeaneſt ſubject even into the moſt honourable exile, unleſs by authority 
. of Parliament. And Dr. H. 1 no inſtance, in fact, of this pecu- 
Har method of bannition, without any crime committed, by the mandate 
of the Vice-Chancellor and cs Surely then notwithſtanding what 
is ſaid above, the Vice-Chancellor's part in conſtituting this Delegacy does 


to fignify,. in one page, wndertaking a charge ; and, in another, being 
'commaſſioned ? Or, by what rule of conſtruction does neogotia ele. 
Genify either o undertate à charge, or, to be commiſſioned. Proſegui, 
. Mr Ainſworth would inform him, fignifies to follow after, to purſue, to 
proſecute, the buſineſs; and, in doing this, they are to obey the com- 
mands of the Vice-Chancellor and Proctors pro re nata. But what has 
this to go with their appointment or qualifications? And why will not 
the general rule for both as properly anſwer all the neceſſary ends, or, as 
he files them, the grounds for this defignation ? Of cheapneſs ? fince the 
majority of five may carry on all. buſineſs ; and the intereſt of the Uni- 
' verſity might ſuffer, if entruſted to fewer than three: Of fitneſs? which 
is more likely to be found in all ranks: and faculties, than in any ane of 
them; Of expedition? for, even in vacation, a Convocation may be held 
for their nomination, at nine in the morning; and they may be ſworn at 
any hour of the ſame day in that long neglected aſſembly, called a 
Sim le- primo. Stat. Tit. 12. And, in fact, there are many inſtances in 
the Regiſter of Delegates ſent upon journeys who are all nominated in 
the uſual form. For example; 23 Nov. 1647, © Vice-Cancellarins pro- 
pſiut "ut viri quidam idonet nominarentur, qui hbujus gart [de JCtis 
« cbnſulendir] curam a Onmes uno ore conſenſerunt.. Demum Pro- 
©. curatores nominabant [quinque) Delegatos, qui (inter alia) caufam Aca- 
e demiæ Londini follicitarent : Eogue nomine expenſas ſuas in ditto negotio 
gf eragatas e cifta Univerſitatis reciperent; ita annuente venerabilt cru 
* Fg Doftorum,' Is b regentrum & non ORD bf il 


neſs &c. 0 p. iv.) and theſe four are the four only forts of Delegates. (p. li) 


rr. Dr. H's doctrine wich regard to the nomination of this fourth, 
4 or general, Delegacy, is fully ſtated and conſidered in the twelve firſt 


and Ffour _— A doctrine, he will do well to remember. 70 
C 0 


need ſome farther diſtinction. How therefore does the ſame phraſe come 


Ongany, 20.. The fourth ſort of Delegacyi is for occaſional 3 buſi- 


| _ Obſervations and Replies. And ſuppoſing with him the occaſional, or 
eneral, .ſort to be ſplit into two ſiibdiviſions, it will then be acknow- 
led ged, that the Sad have provided us with four ſorts of Delegates, | 


* 
* 
& - . 
— Ä— I 
—— —— 
r . — -—1—2 oSGueio_m_ Oe = — 


2 
- _ 
— — — oc — — 4 — 
v — — — —— — te = 


G a 2 oy 
— — — 


— — . 


—  _—— - — — —- 


— -—- —— 


_— * * 4 p — PR 
* — * — 
e 3 = 
——— 2 
WP 
— "SPpennn 


- 75 F a p , n 
"> J * 1 1 v 
l } 3 : \ i 
4 it; a . 1 | 9 o - 
. f - l * U R 7 N 
1 7 . 
q + 7 12 > ; 4 


0 3 74 i C12 
1 9 
* I : N 10 2 
* . ADS. 
F344 j; 1 ENS \ i 
; i4 * S of 1 a l * 5 , a N . 
> p = \ 54 E . #2) 
| * | 4 * | | | : % 
b e 155 „ . 3 | 
J y K a= * 1 \ \ 
1 4 G «203 + b d 
- 7 = . 7 * 3 . 2 - k — 4 1. * r 
" . * i : l p l 4 : 
* « * , * N 'S. 2 . 5 4 1 0 i * 3 * ? - . : 
. 4 7 1 *. * 4 * $4 
4 = * * „ p - 1 i 4 
: 


: 


V4 * * ts e 


0 1 a ae . Ts f , a Dy! eee 


e 21. That the Delegates of the Preſs ouqt to he, and gow tig = 
an, Stats Belegen n Mraphics & pro ationibus cjufdees, I- .) 


Axrrür. This is ſetting up a tb denomination of Delegates; whereas | I 


_ the preceding Obſervation aſſures us, that there are fur, and only faur. 
Now as theſe are neither, 1. Stated Delegates of Accounts, Li Kalas ra 
Hones Un ver fitati reddendas  accipient ; nor, 2. Delegates of Nees, 
nor, 3. Occaſional ett Delegates ; it follows "re Barr = - 

4. What Dr. H calls Occaſional Home Delegates ; whole Þþ * 


1 thus hinted at by the e a domo Convac Comvacations af; 
OEB. 22. Var. of the Prefs: 0 gtated Pa uh at 


Statuta typographica delegantur. it. 18. Sect. „ p * 

Stated ates are fuch either from the matter ef their titeſt being fore- 

Enovyn, prrferibed, and permanent ;——or from the certain continnance 
= fame perſons in the ſame truſt during life or reſidence er frem 
; (p. iv. p. vi.) But in the of the Preſs the matter of the 

hoe is Ne &c, and the Delegates have «lvays een confinued i 
the fame truſt during life or rendenee, . ey SO OT TREO e 

1 


«44+ 4 
„„ 


| RvyLy. This is arguing from matter &. fact "> am A 
KP: has been done to what ought to he done; the conclufivencisot which | 
is more ſully conſidered in the Reply to his next Obſervation. In dhe 
mean time, we may remark that this definition of ftated Ddlegates, to 
-uſe an expreſſion of Dr. Ws, has too much laxity. The matter of 4 
delegated truſts is forcknown,' and preſcribed, and in al acies the 
ſame perſons continue with equal certainty in the ſame truſt, ſo long as 
that truſt ſubſiſts. The only proper en preſſion here made uſe ef is that 
of permanence; by which muſt be meant à neceſſary and eſſential per- 
manence. And this ingredient of neceſſary permanence is in * 
buſineſs of Printing; for that may poſſibly be intermittæd for a time, (as 
. ſeems to have happened in the middle, and at the cloſe, of the Grand 
Rebellion.) In ich caſe it is apprehended that the legzey is of 
courſe diffolved. And ſhould it be afterwards-reſumed,' a he Delegaey 
7 muſt then be conſtituted, as was done in 1653, and 1662. Aletter 
definition of Started Delegates ſeems to be, a permanent ſet-of flons, 
to whoſe care a pi of ſucceſſive matters is committed... s 
general, or occaſional, Delegates, are a {et of perſons to whole charge 
one only buſineſs is. entruſted ; upon the diſpatch of which buſineſs ſuch 


occalional De expires, and th are no bh Dele ates. . Thus a 
legacy pi ey ger Deleg 1 


2 


* 
* 


: Br. 
at, as u reaſon for ſome explanatory Statute wide regard to the Delegates 
of the Preis. 


the Protor's accounts for the cutrent year, another to audit the Vice- 


ſabiMitalton; but no ſubffitution of Delegacies is 
but in Stated Delegacies only ; ; therefore this is a Stated Delegacy. (p. vii.) 


» 


a legacy; and when that 
a, . n however long the 


_ +» pegotiation'may luft, their traſt continues. Thus, till the promulgation 


of the new Mrs one ſet of Delegates uſed to be appointed to audit 


Chancellor's; and Others ſor other accounts. Theſe were at that time 
occafional. Delegate? (as mdeed there was then no other ſpecies) and 


len they had paſſed the decoumts committed to their infection, the 


was diffolyed.* But, by the new Satute, Srated or Standing 
were firſt appointed ; not to audit this or that particular ac- 


Delay 


cout; but, ui sid As ratroncs Dee er, reddendas acci pient; and 
the care is permanent; that is, it nece 


and unavoidably will con- 
tinue ſo long as thy teſide in the Univerſity. Witcher to the Dele- 
gates of Appeals, they fo far partake of the nature of Stated Delegates, 

ey are. afti to diſpatch 'a''mulfiplicity of ſucceſſive matters, 
Cauſis 0! 1 lationim; but they want the ingredient of perma- 
nence, as they laff only for one year; and therefore they are not abſo- 
lately denominated**Stzr? Delkgati, but only are compared to ſuch, 
vr Stati Delegati, with reſpect to I r. nn 
the. Hork time Kare continuance, *& c Wee 12 


Open. 23 This I 7 has Som Its Kl origin bile ſupplied by 
. * for by Statute 


Rertv. The filence of the Statates with regard to ſubſtitafion in any 
ts but thoſe of eee ag Al was formerly hinted to 
by a perſon, whom he would frequently be underſtood to glance 


The turn eee OR? own. 1 
n ande; 


e 21 211. 4 Ai 


r The only Delogacics, kr which the eee. a kad, 
Delegacies. 


7 


':, hare; 


Katy be ey nn . 
ee, J 
- This fardly 14 i; not reaſoning, 6 . The 6 un» 
true if the'Deleghcy of Appeals be not a ſtated Delegacy. (ee —4 an 0 


* Tho minor ismall eva iegular, for it 


* 


7 ; / 
. 
— 5 WS. 
* f 
0 , 


7 
„ 


£ * 
my as Sr 4a. 828 "ited 
* G . - 1 1 
4 TR RL A * 
. - \ * In. * + os 
- | 1 1 . f 
l 4 * , N 
* Fe, 
a r 9 7 
3 9 * x F E #1 F 1 
- * F 1 : » 4 
a | A ; | 
= A = p - 7 * = 
- >. 1 
5 3 p 
. 4 —4 1 
* 4 0 ; 
— 
g os 2 : 
ws 7 1 
* 
. we 2] 4 
| 5 3 
= * —_— , »- 
* > 
: * 


* 

" "+ 
4A o - 1 | 
a” y 5 \ | * 
PS 1894 


I a 


ws WES 
Ft if „ 
A | ES be 1 F | | 
| N ; 1 ji 15 1 . 2 { 
EE 3 | 1 | * 2 H 4 TIF © | 2 1 3 1 | 
thus conceived. But for! this Delegsey che Statute., provides g ſub. ũ 
5 3 ä 4 * 4 "Id. FR. 22 1 "> . 1 * by 7 N 
a . Is # | C7 | þ d 1 . Br g N 
tution, and then the conclusion might have followed in due form; and 


we ſhould only have denied the fact. The truth is, there is ſome diffi- 


k 
* . 


f \ 


an explanatory Statute z and. that is, whether ſuch a power. can, or can» 


not ſubſiſt, unleſs it be expreſely pravided for by Statuts, as in che two. 


inſtances above-mentioned, For if it cannot ſubfiſt, unleſs. by expreſs 
words, then in the preſent caſe all nominations ſince the original appoint · 


ment muſt have been illegal and void; and the confequence will be, not 


that ſuch illegal nominations have changed the nature;of the Delegacy "2 


but that the Belegacy itſelf has long ago expired. But on the other hand, 
if it can virtually and impliedly ſubſiſt, though. not pfiff ien by.” 


Statute, it probably ſubſiſts in that office, to Which the nt, ef nomi⸗ 
nation originally belonged; and conſequen 8 ution 
Proctors is as valid as their firſt nomination. And this is confirmed by 
the uſual Practice of the Bei, As (among many other inſtances). 
to the Occaſional Delegates pro Horte Botannico th Mar. 1660, the. 
Proctors 0n..12th. Mar, following ſubjoined two 
Dec. 1669 ſubſtituted ſeven others. ES 75 * 2 lee N n 
Ozsxxv. 24. They are Stated Helegates; becauſe in an Act of Con- 
vocation, 17th October, 1643, Mherein they muſt be ſuppoleg ahne 


% | OX 
L FI&S+ 2.3) 


been intended, they are called Stati Delegati ; which ſhews that they Were 


then conſidered as ſuch, (p. ix. x.) 131333 :; 


| RutLy: The Act here quoted is an, AQ of Convocation-jof the ag 
November, 1644; which only recites- what had been done on 24th 
October, 1643; and that not very accurately; for though the king's 


letters were then read, yet no reference was then made of them to 


1 . * 


* 


Delegacy whatever. Though had ſuch reference. been really made in 
the * here ſpeciſied, and had the Delegates of the Preſs been there- - 


by intended, yet it ſhould be conſidered, that this is a matter entirely 
collateral, having no reſpect to the right of their appointment. 


the other collateral Act, 3 iſt Mar. 1637, (cited p. vni. ix.) they are not 
called Stati Delegati, which is a proof, of equal validity that they were 
not then conſidered as ſuch, But, there is no inftance produced ofitheir 
being called fo in any Act, relative. to their Appointment, MI the 28th 


April 1694 ; though ſeyeral of the Proctor's nominations in words of 


the firſt perfon) are entered at length in the Regiſter. And indeed had 
the Regiſter ſo called them, in one ar two appountments,./that.would no 
more convert them into Srated Delegates, than the calling by that bel 


tly the ſubſtitution of hs 


F * 
Mor y and on 6th 7 N 
\ - 4 2. 2 „ . * | - oF 
0 k 
<< WT. p : , 


9 


f 


0 , »* 
11 F = : . 
4 l „ 0 
x - , - 
4 
- U 
- . 
£ £ 1 
22 * 4 l : - b . 4 
A; > n Lal 34 * 1 
1 o _ P o 7 4 4 
- 0 = 
- : \ \ * 11 
4 G : 6 8 x * . * 
wx $ 
of ” - my 
* ; { de - * 


PF. x 


. 


f 


1 1 1 8 - 4 > & \ 
5 4 # ; | a 55 * 
» s 4 1 * ' | 
. * a . 
| * | 8 ; 4 q p ; * 1 , 
N * ; | e ; y 12 3 g 
a F A , 2 . "Pp, 9 
F 4 *\ 3 5 — 0 1 8 0 % 
4 ; | | | 1 
n 1 ap 4 - _ 4 ; ; 
ö my 4 4 p 4 n 
I'S lation ! f Del f . = d, 4 a * 0 * N * f ! ; 0 


And /agth November, 1937; and others, converted thoſe. from the occa- 
| nal to the fated kind. Nay, farther; ſuppoſing Delegates of the Prefs 
not only to have been CALLED, but alſo to Be Started Delegates, it will 
not therefore follow that they are Stared Delegates vf Accounts, as they 
- mult pe proved to be in order to eſtabliſh the Vice-Chancellor's negative 
over them. It would only prove (as was hinted in Reply to Obſerv. 13.) 

that both Dr. H. and the Proctors have been inaccurate in diſtributing 

the ſeveral ſpecies of Delegates; for under the fated kind, Dr. H. ranks 

none but thoſe of Appeals, and Accounts; and the Proctors the latter 

bY whereas it would then appear that there is another ſpecies of Stated 
Delegates® omitted by both, viz, thoſe of the Preſs, But notwithſtand- 

ing, as theſe de not excepted from the general rule of nomination, 
they muſt of courſe be governed by it, and be therefore abſolutely nomi- 
. nated by. the Proctors. For if the Houſe ſhould hereafter direct a per- 
manent Delegacy to be + Lada p. to viſit at certain periods the Univerſity 
eſtates, or, from thence forward to inſpect the repairs of the public build- 
ings, theſe, (whether called ſo or not) whuld by their conſtitution be Stated 
Delegates; and yet the form. of their appeintment would not be altered, 
nor would the Vice-Chancellor acquir :wnegeflary voice in their nomi- 
nation, finleſs it were expreſsly ſo ordained by a new Statute. Dr. H. 
ſcems ie be aware of this, when he advances in | 


” 


i 


o 


'Oxsxxv. 25. That Doctors only have been nominated upon the De- 
legacy of the Preſs, (p, xi.) That by ſtatute the Delegates of Accounts 
haye no certain number appointed, nor deſcription of perſons (p. iii.) but 
may be all Doctors; whereas in occaſional. Delegacies there muſt be 
one or more Maſters. (p. xi.) And thence he ſeems to infer, or elſe he 
infers nothing, that Delegates of the Preſs are not occaſional Delegates, 


but Stated Delegates of Accounts. 


err. The Logic of theſe propoſitions, thus connected, will be 
bound of the fame ſtandard with that of Obſerv. 23. or, if poſſible, 
more inconcluſive; if any one will take the trouble to examine it. At 
cleft we will only confider-the; truth of them, when taken fingly. 
Delegities of Accounts, it will be allowed, have no certain number ap- 
pointed; neither have Occaſional Delegates, neither have any other, ex- 
cept only thoſe F Appeals. But it cannot be admitted, that by Statute 
they have no deſcription of perſons, or that they may all be Doctors, 
even at their original appointment; for ſuch is the import of theſe words, 
being ſet in oppoſition to the qualifications of pccaſional n. to 


my 


wu — g , y . *; 
\ * C 7 7 7 
4 J i - 171 4 4 
| . 54 ; $74 8 | 
W : 4 f 'F | . * . & 2 - 
l 7 i _ : . * & "7 \ \ "0+ - 1 > "FX * 
* - : \ \ - . 1 © - * d 
9 . l 5 7 MAT: p 7 1 
. 1 1. 7 fx " 
l j | 8 45 
1 y, \ l l 4 1 P 7 
N " : : 4 s,' # 4 | 7 * 
2 t L « : Z * . q 
* 2 . p , 4 , 


_ which RO” . „ 1 


way is biit 9:4 Stattits, the” D. H. dit 
in öder t form a more co 
Delegaties at their firſt” 
Pacultatibus, er tx Doffor bus, Mag 
This is the 


inguiſhes it into £400, 
mplete repreſentative of the Heu L 
een, maſt confiſt of M, eee 
Magiftris res bs; e non * 
rule as contained in the firſt elauſes; Which' detet- 
mines the qualifications of all Helegates, and alſo the 


gacy of Accounts; But has made is exceptiot with regard to their quali-* 
heatiohs: And aceorditigly, in the BH Hewfiridtion afte# the new Ste 


*. nominabanit bus egfegies viths Skaten Deligutos ud dudienlm et deter mi- 
* Handum fingules Tutiones froe computa Uni bert ati.“ via. Five Doctors 
in Divinity, two of Phyſic, one of Law, and five Maſters of Arts, 
How far the ſame qualifications ought to be regarded in ſubſequent - 
ſabrogations is a — which has not been yet attended to. But fince 
Dr. # has thought propet to bring it upon the carpet, it perhaps may 
deſerve confideration. For, i the Deny: ef Appeals, upon every 
ſubſtitation, the ſame qualtfigatiops are directed to be obſerved if ble," 
as in the original app tment. Not need we apprehend affy /iheonye- 
nience to the preſent Delegates of Recbunts from this diſquifition,as ſuch 
an omiſſion will not (like a defect in the nominating power) ) invalidate 

any former nominations ; but mY ;"_ be a 40 and ſup 
i "ring with all convenient i hee 


according to the ecedent in 
to theDelegacy of Accounts a two Maſters of Arts; and 


to the Delega gacy of the Preſs a broad and a Regent Maſter ; the late 
Proctors having already added, to the. latter, a Juriſt and a N W 
Maſter, in ther two laſt nominations. ? 
N. B. The date of this amended precedent, ſhould be 1642, and 

not 174.3; and the page of the regiſter 53. a Arn 

HILLS numerous ty phical errors, Which one ſhould * have 
1 pected from a Candidate for the Care of the Freſs. 


| „ontkav. 26, The oath wh qualification for Stated 
counts, mutatts mit andis, 


of a Delegate of the Preſs. But that for Occafional is far from 
being fo; ab nd obligation is ſpecified for fidelity in Avavants. (p. vii) | 


xxx, The oath of Delegates of Accounts which is very antient (b 
ib. i Fro. 104 b.) is ate ſvitable to their kind. of truſt, as it en- 


4 ; 


Delegites 4 Ac- _ 
is quits ſoitable to this kind of truſt, viz. that 


ht of nandination. 
A ſubſequent clauſe hath altered tie Hahner of notination in the Dele- 


was publiſhed, 26th July 1634. Privcifdtores fecundity nb Statutn / 


a Sages 


3 


p ? 
. * ; * 
1 * 
ri 
l - * 
. 4 


"7 
plain cbhſtruchom of the Städte, Tit. y, Sect. 4. 57. ae 
that, ba 5 885 


ight alſo be ſuitable to their truſt, But ſurely Dr. 
; inculcated by the Delegations and Decree of 1633, 
36S. 13 and 1662, N ratianem inan, gue amnliima noftra 
if provilegia in mijorem Arademiæ V TILIBATEM redeant & HONOREM ; 
un ge free Grams liters agtinande, & MSS. Bibliotbecæ 
„ad. Orca, Arabica, & Linguarum Orientalium ſelectiore.— 
Luce publics Tay Gaara e typographica condant, lites dirimant, 
« pralum academicum ſuperudeant, rem typographicam i in uni ver ſum pro- 
. curent, & Tatianem quotannis REDDANT de receptis & expenſis, quo tem- 
© Pore Vice-Cancel. 1 ſuum fecerit.“ Let him now reconſider 
the oath of Delegates of Accounts, and judge whether it be quite ſuitable 
to this kind of truſt ; whether an obligation, merely quod Mica & #- 
delem cumput um AUDIET, can be adminiſtred with propriety to one whoſe 
inſtructions are, quod ratianem guatammis REDDAT ; and, 2 whether 
the general ok quod ius & munus Delegati ſuper negotiis fibi com- 
miſſis ſeduld & diligenter exequetur, does not enge 8 as we for . in 
. as 2 other branches of An truſt. 


OrsxRv. Tan But the on Ong non 0mnino jp EP ex FE S 
4 He. is highly proper in L Occafianal Delegacies, but very un- 
ſuitable to perpetual Delegates: Which thoſe who bave forcibly admi- 
att emed this oath guld.do well to ceconſider. 


""Rxetv. An Occafianal Delegacy may be very goed, in et ! in- 
' 3 beſideß the preſent (as in that of the Phy 22 arden, ſee Reply to 
Obſerv. 23.) And yet there is no proviſion 5 altering the ſtatutable 
_ cath in ſuck caſes. But even ſuppoſing this Delegacy perpetual, where is 
tho abſurdity of being bound to attend upon proper s, Withqut a 
1 excuſe to the contrary? All Members of -, ee are 
boupd upon their general oath to attend the ſervice of the Hquſe, being 
. debize premonitt : And as all Delegacies are the Houſe in miggature, the 
ſame obligation to attendance is neither unneceſſary nor unſuitable to 
them. We call the obligation the ſame, for a man cannot in either eaſe 
be. expected to attond without notice; and there is a proxiſion in both to 
diſpenſe with their attendance for j juſt cauſe! of abſence. And this oath 
all General, or Occaſional, ene (when legally a appainted) are 
bound ito take in 3 Juramentum Wann which 


2 2 


* « 
. 
a — 4 
J \ A 
% &* * 
1 4 - 
wr dl * F A 5 
* V, 1 
"> * 4 

- : : * * — 

— * — 
. N 


Member of . Uneedy, who hath: taken the Oaths of Allegiance, - 
Supremacy; or Abjuration; the Savilian Profeſſors, the Libra, and 
all his Electors (who all take their oaths in the' firſt perſon); may with . 
equal propriety be denominated Se/f-Swearers, as the n 8 9 
5 97 H. hath beſtowed that obliging epithet. (p. vi) 14 

NV. B. Theſe three laſt Obſervations, if well Bunded. "outs hr 


tend to infer, that the Delegacy of Accounts and of the Preſs are 


eo oe ITY one and the fame. A poſition that Dr. H. has not ventured to ad- 
OY voance in print; as it contradicts the experience of above a century.” 


Thus far to invalidate the argument of the Proctors; here reduced 
into three propoſitions. How far he has ſucceeded herein, not they 


„ 2 


4 but the reader muſt determine. He next proceeds to obviate the 
7 2 Precedents, in which the een . the Vice-Chancellor and Houſe 
is omitted, 


io Ons Rv. 28. The S of the Vice-Chancellor and Houſe = te, 
"and uſually 1 is, given by ſilenee, (p. vi. P. Xii.) =D 25 | 
t. Does 


Rrrl v. This is a very good. prover, but a bad argumen 
the Regiſtrar therefore s en conſent which i is given by filence ? 


This will not be pretended, When a queſtion is propoſed, he alwa 

enters it as agreed to unleſs it be denied, As therefore no conſent of 

Vice-Chancellor, or Houſe, is entered with reſpect to thoſe nominations, 

it cannot be preſumed to have been giyen. And, of courſe, either that the 
nomination was good without ſuch conſent, which the Prodicrs appre- 
hend to be the caſe: Or that it was void; and then thegwhole Delegacy 
muſt have long ago expired, for no o ſubſtitution to perſdm 0 * 
named can continue it. | a 


Ovsexv, 29. Arguments are not colelative which are drawn Bus 
omiſſions concerning matters of form, directed by Statute; which may 


might not be thought hecellary by the Regiſtrar to be inſerted in every 
| inſtance. (pP. vii.) | 


l Regiſtrar would probably think them neceſlary to be inſerted. -: But are 
the copſent of the Vice-Chancellor and Houſe merely matters of form? 


| re directed by Statute, Oe are matters of 32 3 _ were 
y —_ 


2 pe the circumſtance of form omitted; and which for that teaſon 


Rxrpr v. For that very aaa ies they are directed by Statute, the 


eigene, to exact or adminiſter it And every» 


* 


1 25 1 3 ae 
*. elle whence has ariſen this controverſj? But he is EN 
pleaſed-irſt to ſuppoſe/that-fuck conſent was held to be ebenen adly, | 1 
„ Tha t was enen en; züdly, That the: conſent of tlie Houſe . 
EET ben omined for 35 years; and that of the Vice-Chancellor for 61; merely ! 
—— _ throughthe negligence of the Regiſtrar 3" and then, laſtly, obſerves that | 

drawn from fachomiffions/are not concluſive. But ſurely ar- 
ments drawn from ſuch ere are leſs conclufive: for if a ſtring 
fitions amounts to 2 man of a lively fancy may 


1 2252 — . s ded public: Records ate appealed to, we 
8 maß ns am implicit etedi p:and all that is therein contained muſt 


— p ? 


me 
- 


to have been done, and what is not therein contained muſt 
not be ſuppoſed e have been done; elſe there is an end of their teſti- 
many. Beſides, even one, and much more a continued, omiſſion of 
this conſent, will weigh mote than a multitude of inſtances in which it | 
| Rus been given!“ For if the conſerit be neceflary, and it is omitted, the 1 
- appointment is illegal and void upon the face of it. But if it be not ne- Wo 
cCeffury it may be either ſuperadded to or with-held from, ſuch an ap- * | | 
Pointment, ' without increaſing or diminithing it's validity. For fuch | | | 
conſent, whether given'rwice,/ or thrice, does not make-iticlf neceſſary 
for the future; and therefore the preciſe number of inſtances may well 
be abprobended: not ri be of any very material conſequence, (ſee p. xiii.) 
Suppoſe a Vice- Chancellor mould formally declare his conſent to the no- 
mination of Delegates of Appeals; or-ſhould aſk and obtain the 4 | 
bation of the Houſe to a Maſter of Auguftins, or of the Schools; all bY 
which are allowed"!(p.'x1;)- to be entirely in the nomination of the ö 
Proctors, aud to be exceptions to 4 general rule, to which, by the 1 
way, they Rave no relation; (fee Reply to Obſerv. 16.) Would Bech a 4 
ſuperfluous conſent deprive the ſucceeding Proctors of their ſtatutable right [I 
of naming? Or, to gie a more ſtriking inſtance, of annual practice; 
the vonſent of Convocation is conſtantly aſked and given to the Chancel- | 4 
zores mind tion of his Vice=Chanrellor.: Does that deprive the Chan- 4 
eter of his right bmi ani um aum, foe Vice-Cancellarium No.,t,A NE? | 
Which it may be-obſervedis the fame exprefiivn as inveſts the Proctorss e 4 
with their right of appointing Delegates; and is equally liable, if practice 
be the only male to de charged with a laxity, or melted dovyn into 
OFFERRE "VEE DARE DOMUT APPROBANDUM. But, though practice 
N concurring! With ſtatute may be allowed to be a good interpreter, yet 
+ eſpe modern practice, unwarranted : or oppoſed by ſta- 
bs, 0 — 15 lad. deres ate 192431 4D LESS he. gp bie & 
Oseckv. 30. The quorations are unfair and hae (þ. Xvili.) and | 


there are wh and (p. xiti.) and not accidental, 'omitfions, e 
A : Kt . 


_ * 
re ee. 
- 2 Eg -- . 
IT - mY *. — wan, 5 


* — 


—— „ „. — . - v 


„ x hs 11 e 1 
REIT v. It is not that every ſy gate Ade Nabil e 5 
8 deal copied.) Abbreviations; which do not prejudioe the eur dte i- 
ae ee But ; Which might a real Qneſtion, Was 
knowingly or voluntarily' omitted. The Proctor upppſed la ae well — 
to propoſe the Delegacy as to name the Delegates, TRIED * F 
exiſtence but in Dr. e imagination, they ccuid dot che." F 
produce any extracts relative to that int, This redaoes-the ane . 
complained Adel to tuo; in the Delega ef 28) Abril, 1691, and 28 
1694. And herein it muſt 1 de gonfſeſſed, that, . 
a 1 through haſte and inadvertence, there are two oihiflions:; fof wie they 435 
beg pardon of the readers of their former papers; and hope they wall be Ie 
attributed (as was really the caſe) to the ce of the-ſcarcher, | 
who was entirely unpracticed in ſuch buſineſo, and to the voluminous 
bulk of the Regiſters which were neceſſaty to he conſuked on dhe occa- 
fion. Indeed they are ſotry to ſind, that Dr. H. ſhauld aflert the little 
likelihood of an overſight, and ſhould take it for granted that all ſuch 
omiſſions muſt be voluntary; ſince he himſelf, who after {o-harſh a cen- 
% ſure was bound to the utmoſt accuracy, has not only made ſeveral mil- 
takes in his account of the conjunction ee pen ber thes's home 
ſon, as be ſeen comparing the Liſts; as totall 
pwr Mew Gf Pe the 4b Delegacy 0 aof the Preſa; the one of D.. 
Co3b, g Fuly, 1717; the other of Mr. "Beg, 27 March, 1727 ; [though 
they. both are © as conſpicuous as any thing in the page; wrote 
with initial capitals; the former nominated at the fame time, and in 
the ſame paragraph with Dr. Barum, whoſe appointment he hag given us; 
and Dr. Panteng. expreſsly ſaid to be appointed in the room of the former, 
and Dr. Holmes of the latter, in their ſeveral nominations referred; to by 
Dr. H. And yet, after all the Proctors will not charge either of thele 
omiſſions as wilful, unleſs Dr. H. mien "ated that an overſight is 
« thing improbable. Y 124951008: frrvtnce 5d. 
As to the-firſt of their own! omiſllens, it ws 6 5s gnified to the; Members 
of Convocation as ſoon as diſcovered (in ee ) by an additional paper 
in the following words. In jag 05 the from the Univerſity 
Regiſter lately diſperſed, it appears ak the following clauſe, ſabſequent 
to the nomination of 22 April, i691, was overlooked; ; viz. Ropunte 
 « Pice-Cancellario, ſupra ſcriptos Delegatos wenerabilis. Domus Convoca> - 
4 tionis approbavit. | Therefore in the paragraph immediately preceding 
0p; the Extracts, for tuo and only tuo he pleaſed to read three, and 
three. This Advertiſement Dr. H. hath entirely ſunk, and with the 
ſame degree of candor hath, aflerted (p. xiii.) that?“ this citation was 
cc „ to prove think there was no mention of the Vicer Chancellor his 
7 N interfering 


&the 


i, © 


— 


— 


1 0 


« inefering far; vpwacds of 20 years. Wheress the words ai ne 
Dope 80 cer ie this period- “ po mention is once made of ji ; 


iee-Chancellor's, intenſemiig in the nomination :*' Which this 
7 means:diſproyes; as: it only ſhews a third approbation of 


be thous 


7 (over aud above the and they en which nobody could har 


The latter omiffion they remained ignorant of, till the 


Dr. Hs Pamphlet. No. remarkable inſtance they own it is, which 


thi 
— of the Vice-Chancellor s not interfering, from 70 to 61 years; but 


alſo as it fixes the zra of the Vice-Chancellor's aſſuming this power, as to 


which they were before in the dark. What alterations either of theſe 
omitted paſſages will make in the 5 part of the e eee, 
We es de judgment of the eader. 02 


Ontav.” 31. There but one well of a legal Dili 1 Pit 


ing, from 1 April 16 33, to December 22d, 1662; which is twenty 


nine years. and a half” What is become of the entire online of 


27 Ws 45 111 Fi 
years?” | . | 2 | d 7 14 


- s * 10 > 


Far for wpwards 0 of ; thirty 


. 4 1 


20 Nad. So niet a daleulasor ſhould have obſerred his ſous 11 67 
1633 to th October, 1668, (when the innovation was firſt made ler 
ſuperadding 

during that per 
all of nominations entirely neu; made by the Proctors only; at diſtinct 
periods of time; under perſons differing in other principles, and yet 


8 anon 


Henn, 32. his the Delegacy began 8 to our . Gt bf 
and the obne. WL the Delegates could not be by a, Statute not then 


formed; (p. X. * 1 theret ore the nomination- of 1033 Can. be no Nestern | 


"Rev? . 1 mould be remembered that the rig ht of nomination Mid 


dodyn by our preſent Statute, is declared to be 3 old right; Ph effe 
coN8UEVIT;” and therefore might. probably have been obſerve 
inſtitutiog "little antecedent fo. our ' preſent Statutes, which were totally 


di geſted 5 dhe 20th Avg. 1633, were reviſed by the Chancellor and 
were publiſh 


til 039 


; "$4 14 th * \ * — 


ut, on che * band, though it 's faid 0 p x.) that theſe 
5 2 "Delegates | 


publication of 


could hive wilked to: have ſooner known ; not only as it reduces the 


the conſent of the Houſe) is upwards of thirty years. And 
riod there are three inſtances, (in 1633, 1653, and 1662) 


agreeing in this point; all which ſtrongly ſhews the ſenſe which was en- 
tertained of the A e ti G ee eee ks 11. ne 


in an 


in Convocation 22d July, 1634, and printed the ſame 
year; 0 the preſent 'correfted copy received not its final ſanction 


— 


mae n Ne hate dry 
Was e 
was introduced by the new Statuts. Fund irimediately-thereupe 
is taken t 


ba 


academical tranſactions under that government. were: illegal; for theo even 


Chancellor, or ſubſequent apprabation of 
that the new 


and their public offices, and with ſuch. a ſtatatable 7 rega 


is made between this, and the * * of ACOOUM 3 and the 


» : * = p * * * * / * 
0 ; >, l 2 1 55 
% 5 r x5 If k 
4 4 . 7 
0 4 


poſſible; 2 aud very nate: See gin 'y —— ; 


nt a Stated Delegacy for Acoounts (ſe Reply — 


25.) while the buſineſs" of the'Preſvis Jeft-in the! hands f its Wender De- 
| legates, . who could at their inftitution be ne other than General; 'Occa- 
Rona ell i: B 1 ene aer ed OM 47 os Ba Rong +! 4 


* Is HRW WH — 3 enn 5 
1 5 Aj But. : 2 Much 3653) 8 Was; made 
moſt illegal — wk in To eee of the 


even while the former 


Delegacy was. ſupſiſtingz and "There 


ore can. be 


443 


REPLY. The late Proctors are Hog eater adtnirert of aw Oliveriztr 
government than Dr. H; their idea af Which is that hangs Ken mg 
ence of protecting the rights of the community, it tends. only to 
an arbitrary power in a ſingle perſon... Yet they cannot agree that all 


3 Precedent. (ex-, 4s Jr eb $131k ted i Cf nd 


every degree ſhould have been vacated, and. the whole regiſter ; at en 
deſtroyed. Whereas the damnator ſentence, produced by. 55 H. (p 

to invalidate (it is prſumed) this | Delays 

as were contrary to the duty of ſubj 


15. 
legation, extends only to 0 Ats 
bjects, ſcholars, and honeſt men. And 


here it may be incidenratly abſeryed that in the Delegacy of 31 Ocdto- 


Math i 666, which conferted that i 


important cenſorial . the Delegates 
were tionainated. 


by the Proctots only, ; without any conſent. of the Vice- 
er the Houſe. But, he adds, 
that the fotmer Delegacy was Nil ſubſiſting, and therefore would: infer 
appointment was illegal. We were before told, and very 
truly, (in Obſerv. 22.) that Delegates continue during life; o reſidence; 
When therefore they ceaſed to refide, whether by compulſion or choice, 


_ their Delegacy Sb: no longer' ſubſiſt, and there was a neceſſity of: ap- 


pointing a new one; as was done for the public Accounts in 1649 and 
for the Preſs in 1663. And, for the ſame reaſon, "at the teſtoration the 


old Delegacies are not ſaid to have revived, or to ſubſiſt; but an entire 


new. nomination is made; for Accounts, 16th Aug uſt, 1660; for the 
Preſs, 22d December, 1662. This Delegacy i Jaden of 16 $3, is form- 
ed upon ſo excellent a model, with ſo much propriety $i to 1 e perſons 
r re 
faculties, as more legal times mag! dae copied. without. 255 . 
not however to be wondered, that Dr. E. mould be wilkog | to a 
this precedent ; ſince in the very fame. Convocation fo Clear a diſtinction 


forms 


— 


— 


= ? 


rn tt BE 


l - % 
* 
4 — 
* Wh \ 
= A 
ent, _ 
1 
. 


| ir | 
SPS. xk E ay 1. 


Ke nomination d @ way dere. But ting thus routed the 
two firſt preredents? ty yt roceeds' t the attack of the 
vent aud December, 166. 1 8 Fene 


On8xzv. 34. And here he muſt beg leave to Noe the sg 3 
N the ingenious Paper-writer, whoſe {kill in the law furniſhes Dr. H. 
with more appoſite expreſſions | than he ſhould otherwiſe haye hit upon. 


N B. « Though this Nomination bears the form of a new Appoint- 
ment, yet as no formal Act was done by the Houſe to diſſolve the 
Old Delegacy, two Members of which, Dr. Fell and Dr. Baylie, 

vi. thoſe nominated 1633, were till living abs reſident, it is 

d 6-apprehended that it could only operate by way of Subſtitution or 


29% > e 11 N 


4 ol en den of the five new Delegates to the former. (p. . 


I re No great {kill in the Jaw was requiſite, to hit upon the ap 

fite e ons of ſubſtitution and ſubjunction, which it is Yap 5 pe 
means. A little, very little, knowledge of the Statutes and . of 
Convocation will furniſh a man with theſe. Nay even Dr. H's. memory. 
(Which certainly ought to be a good one) might have furniſhed him 
with the former, in the Statate cited p. 14; with the latter, in the regiſ- 
ter cited p. xiL of his own. rmance.. But when he borrowed the 
form of the remark, he ſhould haye been certain it would have fitted his 
own materials, which it by no means does. For a Delegacy may be 
faid to have ſubſiſted in 1691, when four members of it ee in 
1688) were ftill livin kc refident, and had been ſo during the inter- 
mediate ſpace; two of them (Doctors Halton and Mili) being heads of 
Houſes when named; another (Dr. Aldrich made Dean of Chriſt Church 
in 1689; z and the fourth (Dr. Fane) being Regius Profeſſor at both pe- 
riods. And yet it does not follow. that a Delegacy muſt ſubſiſt in 1662, 
though two members of it (Dr. Fell and Dr. Baylie) nominated in 1633 


had really been living and reſident; when their bes had been inter- 


mitted for twelve years, -viz.. from 1648 co 1660. The Delegacy of 
1662 was therefore a new appointment, and not a ſubſtitution or ſub- 
junction. But, after all, how comes poor Dr. Fell, who died in 1648, 
to be raked out of his grave upon this occaſion, and to be living Kay 
refident in 1662? Probably it Will be aid, there were two Dr. Fells, 


Samuel the father, and Jabn the ſon; And n is here meant, who 
(though Samuel died in 1648) Was alive both in 1633 and 1662, So 


indeed he was; but in 1633 Was unfortunately but eight years old, tho 


he was matriculated in three years after. Wood's Athen. IL 602. Per- 


haps at laſt then to reconcile all difficulties Dr. H. may ſuggeſt, that Dr, 


| Some Tal having n executed his, fry * many Years, Wie 
a 


7. 


. l ae 7 eee 1 
5 b eſentation. 1 But of this there Are NO traces in the Mi OWE | s & FO 4 A 

Tie inference drawn from their 1 all DoQorss conliteredsbefore, 1 13 
in the Reply to Obſetyv. 25. 1 0 F 


* "OP W 


Obsrxkv. 35. From the year 1 7 Fe a pprobation. 9 5 lie Hs ak 10 hh WL 
omitted in eyery cubRtitution of State Delegates both -for. Printing and = 1 o 


tt for TEN. (except three) though exprelsly required by "Statute (p, xii 170 .) . 
| \ Reery; No inference is drawn from this obſervation; Wa . 
Dr. H. means to infer, that becauſe it was/required, therefore it maſt de 
ſu uppoſed to have been given, though omitted in the regiſter; and if 5 

given in the Delegacy for Accounts, it may alſo be ſuppoſed to have been n 


Mt | "0 given in the Delegacy for Printing; | The weakneſs, of which argument 
1 is ſhewn in Reply to Obſery. 29. For if no approbation appears, none 
B35 dan be preſumed to have been giyen. The con EMT of hich, with 
Mt 1 regard 55 the Delegacy of Accounts, where ſuch approbation is indiſpu. _ = 
1 . tably requiſite, is too obvious to need an explanation; and his brother 3 
| Delegates are much obliged to him for this diſcovery very. There. is another 
remark that naturally — 5 from the ſame diſcovery W vie, that the year 
1694, as it is the zra of the Vice-Chancellor's s,conſent-to the nomination 
of Delegates of the Preſs ; ſo it is alſo the era of neglecting the appro» 
bation * the Houſe, not only as to thoſe Delegates, where we preſume 
it is not required; but even as to. the Delegates, of Accounts, who could 
not ſtatutably be appointed without it. And juſt ſo. far indeed the i intro- 
duction of a Vice-Chancellor's negative over the Proctors nomination will 
always prove, a defence of the ee rights of the N and 95 
regent Maſters. (fee p. Xvi.) eee 


- Onsexv. 36. In the ſubſtitution & 1694, ada many — . 9 is 
no conſolidation of the Delegates of Accounts with the Delegates of the 
P Preſs; to which practice the Paper - writer very falſely aſcribes OO 
1 firſt ranked among the Stated Delegates. (p. xiv. i 05 1 


Rrrrv. The late Proctors have, in neither of their papers, Ale 

the ranbing of the Delegates of the Preſs among the Stated Delegates, to 

this or any other practice. But they now may make this remark, that 

the year 1694, the æra of the Vice -Chancellor's conſent, is alſo the ra 

of thus ranking them. It is true, they have accounted for the unwary 
modern ute of the ſame form of nomination in both, from the more fre- 

924 conſolidation of theſe truſts of later years. And if it did not ariſe 

rom thence, they are at a loſs to know whence it did. For they cannot 

but obſerve, from the liſt of the Delegates of the Preſs, a wide difference 

5 between two periods of exactly the ſame length; the one immediately 


before 


y 


n 
4 


Coll. Wadh. Cu ode, in poſterum Preli curam ſuſcipiant; Qui ut ſtati 


præſentes fuerint, alioqui coram Vice-Cancellario, 5 
nlatore, Juramentum præſtabunt in hae verba — Tu dabis idem ad ea 
. omnia que ad Preli Delegatum pertinent 125 & uu * : 


-——qgpt 6 qa © ee e dete 
concedere, vel alias Univerſitate 3 - 2 cum conſenſu Bomts 
Convocationis Officio abdicare contingat, alii continuò in ipſorum locum 


hujuſmodi nominatio in frequenti Convocatione Domui ſignificetur, de- 


— 


Veoerſitatis Regiſtro peculiari Inſeratur. 


" ” 

. „ ' . A ” 
-—*, * 4 * lp 2 | 
- % 8 | 7 
3 * 
> F : 7 3 4 * 
, n 1 1 — e . _— * : - <4 2 „ 
* — f AF 
: e +. 3 r 2 
N 6 x . 2 
ns * 


* 


be Delegaorum preli nominatione * munere. s . . 


N $UP ER cum res Dern quam in omne ævum hic loci FE; 
1 liciter adminiſtrandam fore ſperamus, melius per ſtatos & perpetuos EAR 
Delegatos expediatur, neque de hujuſmodi Delegatorum nominatione ** 
munere in hiſce Statutis fatis proviſum eſſe videatur. 3 


Pracurr Academiæ ſtatuere & decernere ut t We N & Pro- 
curatores pro tempore exiſtentes, D“ D' Niblett Collegii Omnium Ani- 
marum Cuſtos, DD“ Leigh Callegii Baliolenſis Magiſter, D“ D' Purnell 
Collegii Novi Cuſtos, D' DF. Jenner Collegii Diva Magdalena Fraſes, 
D'. D* Blackſtone e Collegio Omnium Animarum, fimul cum TOY: 
Owen < Collegio Jeſu, M“ J. Bridle è Collegio Novo, D** D Wyndham 


Preli Delegati, de negotiis ad rem Typographicam ſpectantibus cum rela- 
tione ad Domum Convocationis deliberent & determinent, pecunias in 
eos uſus ſolvendas recipiant & erogent, & rationem quotannis reddant de 
hujuſmodi receptis & expenſis, quo tempore Vice-Cancellarius computum 
ſuum fecerit. Et ad hoc munus ſuſcipiendum ſinguli rite nominati ſe 
hide data Univerſitati firmiter teneri noverint, & in ip Convocatione, ft _ 


exigente Seniore Procu» 


% -- 
= 


_ — 


2 


b 4 
$I 23 2 2 ern LC = 
2 EE 
— * 9 * - _ — — a — 
F l 1 . 1 
al: 4 , 1 
- : 4 N 
he * - £3 
y 7 "+ * 
bs % 


TT 'T All IIe bus; 


ſubrogentur, è Doctoribus cujuſcunque Facultatis, vel Magiftri Regenti- | 
bus aut non Regentibus, per Vice-Cancellarium & Procuratores, aut per 

majorem partem eorundem nominandi, & deinceps a Domo Convocatio- 
nis approbandi. Et ut omnia in hoc negotio cautius fiant & intEgrins, 


inde in proxima Convocatione à Domo ſeu — 


Hi autem Delegat bs minimum. r in anno, nempd i in ſecunda 
cujuſlibet pleni Termini Hebdomadi, aut ſcpiüs, 11 ita negotia Typogra- 
phica poſtulent, die & hora à Vice-Cancellario pridic conſtituendis, in 
Typographeo Clarendeniano, aut (fi de juſta cauſa ita expedire videbi- 
tur) in alio loco idoneg conveniant, de negotiis ad rem Typographicam 
ſpectantibus conſulturi. Quicquid vero ipſis placuerit, a Regiſtrario Uni- 


Denique, hæc ſu per Prelo Delegat in poſterum à Delegations * 
Computis ita diſcriminetur, ut non plures quam tres Delegati G "Ik 
rum ſint eodem tempore Delegati * 


H&E 


OS 


o 


22 


o 
= 
R 


n 


” "1 
t * 4 * 


923 


. 


* 


2 */ 
8 


LN 
2 


IR 


" 
. 


„ 


IS, x 9 
5 NN 8 
- Cl Ot x 


2-47 > 
Fas 


2 ; jy * | 
e 
4 a 2 8 855 . : 


ED OI oats SLOW in CES 7% INS 
3 27 ee e 
. WD © n 
5 | "$45 r r n 
3 1 S * 8 
ö B 
- 4 \ N 9 | | 


\ N * * 2 | ; | 
r "= e 636 £4 e : dee Jar | bee | 
W 7 3 2 — 5 . : | - 2 i i . 2 —4 2# * ** c 4 , . | 2 *. wy $4 c 24% "Sa Wat | © 

; | 4 ” . 


er 7 


. 


& 2 
: WT 8 * - 5 Ml 
25 : | | l —— - . " £ k» % = ＋ pits »m o 
or . 5 DE. g F [8 . + * 4 2 Ht * s oy * * ” Py 
l n * 3 1 1 | 7 CT « - . : « «4 
i 3 > * * r * " : 
> | | 


„ . 
WA 1 1 5 > 
. < bot" 82 : | 1 * 4 . 8 . f 
IX, . | 
- a > - | $ 
* . : ; 
* a 0 — 2 4 . ? i < * f 
- * = © x * : 
* 3 : * , 
. | * Me 
: 4 9 TC , . Y 
- - 7 8 x « 9 * 
P vt. 
4 — 
| of % 


$8 
, 
wo 8 5 f 8 5 | 
1 od 4 Fx —_— — OY _ * ͤ— Sw. m — —_—.. 
— 9 
5 * 99 * mane 
75 of ar WER AR At,” \ 77 * * 3 * „ * s 8 |: 
* 78 »L 4 7 r » b K * - * 9 i L 
1 . N | 
| . 
5 : 
- - , 
- - . £ / 
0 
* 
- 
. 
- 
” 
_ ; 
- * 
- * : 
* 9 - 0 
* 
* 7 
. 
* 
N ” 
” 
. 
= 
: 
1 
| | I * » * — 
07 : : 1 "nw" _ "i 
hy oo — W — * 5 ' 


C * os "= 4 
* of i 
9929 3 
* * a * Y 
1 . 
— 
- 4 
- 
* 
* 
* 
, 
ur” 
I 4 
| p- 2 
ry - 
a 
— 
* 
AS 
— 


before, the other . e aſtet the introduction of the Vic Chan- 
cellor's-conſent. viz)-That from 1643 to 1694, but of 35 Delegates of 


the Preſs, only 18 were at the, lame time. Delegates of Accounts, and 
thoſe interſperſed among 49 others ; there being appointed during that 
period! 67' Dclogites bt Accounts: But, from 1694 to 1755, out of, 32 
Delegates of the Preſs, 28 have been alſo Delegates of Accounts; moſt 
of them nominated to both offices in the ſame day, and intermixed with 
only five others; there having been ae this period but 33 Delegates 
of Accounts. And it is obſervable, that from 1722 to 1748, there was 
no perſon in the whole Delegacy of Accounts, but what was alſo a De- 
legate of the Preſs; conſequently none to audit, but ſuch 
to account, . They alſo remark, that of the 35 Delegates of the Preſs 
nominated from 1633 to 1694, only 17 were then Heads of Houſes; 
but that from 1694 (the æra of the Vice-Chancellor's conſent) to 1755, 
all, except the very laſt, have been Heads of Houſes at the time of their 
nomination, to the total excluſion of other Members of Convocation. 
How far this may have contributed to the preſent flouriſhing ſtate of the 


Preſs, or © will be ſufficient'to'open the eyes of thoſe Gentlemen, who 
_ © have apprehended an, Encroachment of Authority, it is not for the 


. 
* 


Prodtors to determine. In the mean time, that Dr. H. ſhould reckon 
bimſelf among the Delegates of the Preſs, (p. xviii.) is ſomewhat fur- 


prizing: But it is ſtill more ſo, that he ſhould venture to aſſert in the 
ſame page, that the Accounts of the Preſs have always been audited and 


ſettled by the proper Delegates, and then the balance already ſtated 
allowed by ſome of them, who were alſo Delegates of Accounts: Since 
he cannot but remember, that in Detember 1755, when the Workmen's 
Accounts were ſettled (for the only time during his office) a mere Dele- 
gate of Accounts was called in, and a mere Delegate of the Preſs, toge- 


ther with the two Proctors were diſmiſſed, and not ſuffered to inſpect 


the Book ; — becauſe they were only Delegates of the Preſs. 


Upon the whole it is hoped, that the Poſitions laid down by the has 


Proctors in their ſeveral papers left with Dr. H. and ſent to the Common 


Univerſity : And therefore they 


Rooms, ſtand clear of all material objections; eſpecially thoſe raiſed by 
Dr. H. They will not . endeavour by any declamatory epilogue to ex- 
cite the paſſions, rather chuſing to addreſs themſelves to the reaſon, of the 
| hey beg leave, for the laſt. time, to ſubmit 
their own ſentiments: and thoſe of their friends, to the judgment of the 
Members of Convocation ; in whoſe determination they have always 
been, and ſtill are defirous to acquieſce : Being, with true reſpect, 


 * 2” Their moſt obedient Servant, Eo RE 
| LAS 1 4 25 PAY 15 togg : . 2 13 PI L + 
Nov. 12, 1756. The PROCTORS of the former Near. 


* — ** 
7 % %- 
et MS. * = — * * 

r => pq ww 


ch as were alſo 


: 
= 
—_—_ * 


ww he mee J . 
6— E —— — 0 


* * 
— I 
— * « 
- * 4 
CV „ 5 
* bs J 4 
7 2 * 
4 . v7 
oY « ok 
— ia. 4 
2 * . * . 
. N 1 
g * 
a - — f 


x 4 A 
Succeſſion 5 the "Pity 5 of the Prefs, 0 
„ From the Year | 1633, to. 1786. Ima e 
L a ot 3 : 
N. B. Thoſe pri a in Jtalics were alſo Stated D % aner during her ge i 1 
this Truſt; tho CNY ad the any Þ. were nominated by the. Proftors only ; with V. 82. 
| conſent of the ice Chancelby; and with C. K. e Ar 
e e eee N | 
1633. Apr. 1. Der ® Fell. P. W br 160 E r 
n | Fraen. P.- | -- 473-30 £13 e,, 55 
F /// ò ↄ «» Got lem Bi, VV 
7 M. WP Y 69 A 48 81 101 
Mei te. P. 1 pr. 2 res Hou n 
8 * Rouſe. P. p. . 1 2 __ . um „ 
* Hammond. 1 q 4 res, care. 16 ; s 44 
5 * Turner: P.. 45 4p" ba Dunſter. P. 4 $3 
 * Hippeſley. P. 1710. Nov. 14. De Lancgſter. VETS. 
1 1 * Morgan. TF7. A. n Die Braithwaite. \ C2 x Mts 
1653. Mar. 26. NI. Owen. B.) 4-23 4 Wo V. R. TRA 
Dies Wilkins. FP. 115 Apr. 23. p-. Gardner. P. 
Goddard. P. OR. 9. DF Mtterbury. V. P. 
FA * Crofs. P. 1 1713. Nov. ro. D' & W 
: Mi * Bathurſt. X 2 n 1 a = 47 08. „. 90 55 
þ | A2 1 0 70 f. 6. * 7 at n 1 
| un 1719. un. 4 0 5 \rt 
LY una cum Vice Canes,” Procun. s 2 * Mather. V. 1 
toribus, ' Profefforibus publieis, 1720. A D Pan VF. 
Profeſſoribus Savilianis, Oratore, 1721. F He 1g Di Dalla. V. P. 
Protobibliothecario, & Cuſtode 1722. OR. 1 „ P. V. Pf. 
© Archivorum, pro tempore. Dec. 10. D Carter. V. 7. 
1662. Dee. 22. Dm 3 | 1727. Mar. 27. M. Bigg. V. en 
4 Tate. P. bs : 777 1728. May 2. * 22 Pu; 7 118 
| | Barlow. P. | | | 2729, May, 16. Dr Hodge: „ 
n V0 Mar. 3. Holmes. V. 1 
ö * Pococke. P. 1730. Oct. 27. Dr Had V. P. 
„ or Err | 1737, Jul: 9. D- Niblm: V. P. 
* Jenkins. 7. | 1734: Jul; 2. Dy Gared, V. f. 
1668. Oct. 5. M. Walker. P. C. | 1738. eb. 26, Dr Lagh..V. . LILY 
1674. Feb. 85 Des * Alleſtree. P. C. | 1740. Nov, 12. M. Pufn V. To 3p; 

; Marshall. P. C. 545 Nov. 6. De am. V. P. 
1688. FW 26. Dre. Halkene Br: it Þ| Dec. 3. D. Fenner. V. P). 34 
TROY r 1748. 24 20. Dr Coneybeare. V. P. 2 

Aldrich. P. Bhs. 1655 Jul. 11. DF Does. i; bn 
| * Mill. P. : . Jul. 2. * D. Blackſtone, V. P. c. 
1691. *. 22. Dre. Halton, P. C. 5 * 28. M' Owen. P. 


Jane. P. C. 47 5 5 
1 10 — » 7 *3 1 
. 4 N \ —_ * . 
* * o a N 4 * L. © « * 
* 


*. » a £ ö 4 4 
4 . „ 5 - 0 : 
6 9 P P R — : ” 
= A l * 4 , . . 
- - - = . 4 
* be 
7 ”. - 0 
we o : 
* - 
n » - 
\ : * : 
. * % - . $ a . f - : 
, a * 5 4 * 
0 * * % 
* * ! 2 - 4 * 
l - " i — p x 1 
— of , 5 6 ” 
% . * I P * 
4 : P + 
8 - 
— - - 1 
fo 4 = \ 7 
* » 


if "wk * 15 Of G Lo N, Ps. * : \ ; F © + 
/// lt Fl toe lie AD 6 5-7 
: 
* 


4 \" q Fan | 8 . 4 ; 
[LEI 1 * '2 101 TS 1 11 12 5 r F * N e 4,3 PI 3-4 . 17 L 5 18 * I. . 55 3 * wed es : - ** 7 4 . & & CY 1 914 pe I. 7 


— —— * "_ ” of » 
q o —_—. — — — 
— A _ \ N i #.4 - l 1 . 9 9 p 
FE — PIT oh dd * WY IL * ** 4 Feen . n e n 
— — —„- _ — — ———__ 


| (erb Ee ed ec e 42740 
N Dm ien ee ien "Ix toad 1 A ne ft ain 505234 F700 


1 


* 


1 


OP SITU ATE OLDS 
$47 4 eil * 3; C0 


„ NI * 
2 3 1 


2 
* * 
. = 


i”, 


* 
. * * 
* 


N 


ay cori % 


* tad» * Gb. 1 } 4: Teer WO 


EXT ACTS. from . STATUTES 
1 | Referred to in th forging 1 Pao. J 


* * 


8 0 


- 
7 a . © 
0 1 


* 7 £% 
: b : F 7 
= * i "%_ » - 


R 


, | & 3 44 f „ vB 
* len 71 1 I. * : G . - 8 | * * 


A 92. 4 erk, 88 ns. Sec 2.4. 2. A 


Si quando ex uk gte ure videbitur, . & novo Fatutere * beruahy ; 
vel, quand circa Statuta & Decreta jam condita, vel condenda, dubitatio 
„ unde ulterior e explanatio » (modo ne, ſub explanandi 
Statuto tuivis affin „oninem han An iludens aut enervans ; neve hæc 

teſtas ad Statuta Regia Auctorirate ſancita yel confirmata extendatur, fine ſpe- 
10 port: kicentia)'ftatutum eſt, quod 8 Lex roganda, vel Statutum expla- 


ntium & non R 
| Callegiorum & Ly ularum pet Vice-Cancellarium refe- 
Atque . mature p , inter eos convenerit de. verbis canceptis, fub quibus Lex 
ſciſcenda, aut . e Inis videbitur, fub iifdem terminis res ad Magiſtros 
Regentes in Domo Congregationis, per Procuratores referetur, triduo ante Convoca- 


tionem  habendam. * knen — 
ſequente, verbis, quibus i in ngregatione fuera 
iſtrarium, mandato Vice-CanceHarii, palam recitetur. Ac demum 1 e 
rocuratores, & major pars Regentium & non Regentium in terminos conſenſerint, 
Tub goto oh Lex ſciſcenda, aut Statutum explanandum videbitur, ſub iifdem terminis per Re- 
en palam ibidem reeitentur; & de nem Negentium & non Regentium ia 
Sub iiſdem etiam terminis, in quos confenſum fuerit, in acta redigantur; nec 
he Wh trigeſimum, immediate ſequentem publicationem ſive recitationem eonundem in 
e Convocationis, vim aut Amen Decrotruch five em fortinntur. 


7 142 T3; Wala FECTE BIT 44 4 G 4F 1 — % + 3 YU* L 


: ; ” Tien. Seck. 2. 77 | een 
Cum varia Univerſitatis negotia, a ꝓaucis citius & commodius, Can a pluribus, expedi> 


Ken en Ne e e Fa, vocationis n 


* * * + * 


ark Convocatione autem 


* 8 7 - 


1 68 : , q * 3 
” * $54 cas 


— 


tium permittatur, primo ad hehdo- 


* 2 vp . 
\ 4 * * 2 1 AD. 
PREP « 5 * * * 8 * _ l . of | 
WY | x 2 N . 1 2 4 EC 2 
de a A * 3 7 1 2 7 42 Sy” 
_ * | ea * Ah ba 
\ 4 C : - N 1 
1 = L 7 ; - : 
l * z 
Bi l 1 s 
| 1 | ; ; 
* o 4 - #4" : 
* A f * . 
- 4 , 
G 3 
* = ” 


** 


n . 
1 
— PIE 


e 33 _ ſtatem habent, quos Del atos | | 


Jus — — 1 ͤ £43 00% 5 790 0.9 77/4 04 2h 
e eſt; (1 e ſingulis Facultatibus, & ex Dodctoribus, Magifris Regentibus, ; N 
& non Regentibus aliqui ſeligantur; qui impoſitum ſibi onus fubire,. & in Co org „ 
2 diem Delegatorum Conventui kalen antecedente, 2 8 9 WF anti; 
re is tur. | | s "1 | | 
1 T0 1 * 


. F. Quod legitime de die, hora, & | CNY Or Fe Me 1 


| per Vice-Cancellarium deg Tr, 1 F 
| « 2. Officium & munus Delegatorum, ſuper negotiis ſibi — ca & Alt- 2 2 87 \ 


o ” „ ob F ; 4 the 2 "FAN 2 
om OAT 2 23 -- monk; 641 38 Wy 14 EINE © 
„ 3. Non omnino aberunt, niſi ex cauſa per Vice-Cancellacium, & Procurtore | 
cc 
vel poſt appeebandg „ g grüb geriet atlt ni 09 ne ' 


Quicquid vero Dez omnes, po major ipſorum pars, arne in negotiis dele- 
gatis, cum nuda relatione ad Domum, fine ulteriore diſceptatione ratum eſt ; in Delegatis vero 
cum relatione ad Domum, & approbatiòne Guſdemn, totius Domus ſuffragiis denuo permittitur, 

Cum præter Delegatos - ad)expedienda/negdtia/intra-Uniyerbtatetn ;- . fit nonnunqua 
delegari Croke ad proſequenda negutia extra Unixexſitatis we um eſt, qu 
(quoties hoc uſu venetit) ad mandatum Vice-Cancellarii &. —— 2 ad 135 85 
modi negotia, pro virili, proſequenda (modo hoc fiat expenſis Univetſitatis) paratos ſepraftens. | 

Quoniam vero ad computandas rationes *r Procuratorum et aliorum, novos 
quotannis Delegatos pro arbitrio Protufatoruim def ewe Hon e re Sende elle; uſu com- = 
4 pertum eft; decretum eſt, quad in poſterum Staci Delega al on 0 
ratores, cum conſenſu Domus 8 Desen e Ss 
is fitati reddendas accipient, præterquam de quibus {| e 24 055 fuerit. 

_ Quorum ſi major pars in Univerſitate GR ge non ones.quzcunque,. 
verhtati reddendæ fuerint) 1 ny vel eorum 72 0 cum os EA 
totidem, . abſentium ad præſens t (quot. 11 RA. * N 


uffecerint. | 


” x 


| Quod fi quos e Statis pile Dita fatis | concedere, val 5 — ee, 
3 ane 29 continuo in ipſorum locum, — nels authoritate, ff 
| i autem Delegati, Re Bansellante, See fer in; 0 prxſeptes 
erint) alioqui 1 i -ancellario, exigente . * e hramentum 


preſtabunt i in hæc 4 46 85 

Tu jurabis, quod audies . per & fidelem com or vin Gabe & lis ape 
„ tandis he] nec. allocabis niſi qua allocanda ſunt ; ſepgſitis dolo,., 1 65 Amore, & 
« inyidia, .. Lac! e e Ie or wen Auers ne 
n 111 „ eee Rae 17. 850. 1 84. 1 Ml þ et (3; au? 


A- 


x hab 


4 e munus 4 di or RR: R 955 nec nan non N- 

. | tium convocare, in quibus "ow fine. W aut [ge-Fancellari} ſui conſenſu proponi aut ſuf- 
* + fragiis perwikty fas pit tiefen WER ant SD 1322018 IRE | . 
1% | | £11427 2866 Td, 15. Sec, 4. 83 44 146" av Vids WIRED 4 058A; 

1 0 Procuratoral munus ft — - Delegatos in quibuſcunque Sir, nec non * in cauſis 


n Oe | „ 09 D891 | 


44 * an Tit. 18. Sect. 5. 2 i 39577 ahead; 34 UF hy 47 {8 aw. 


„Gen deen Rex Cats Queues primus, pro eo affectu, — & Lerato 
fovet; privilegia Univerſitatis, ues rem Typographicam nimis antehac arQata, m_ in 


i 


r 
— MRI: - of 
——— 
„ * 5 


n 
—_— 
SV > \ 
nd * 


4 — = — — as 
8 


. F--» A * $4: ry 4 F N * | ix I * 
= \ _ 2 * pO A i, 5 * * 71 ; a 4 F l ( | 4 ; TY \ 
N - f y TY. 9 — Y RR az 4 „ 9 . 5 5 1 1 4 _— * : 7 * 4 = 
* 43% Fe. Mo l - "Ax, £7 . 1 Hy - 
F+ * N . —* 5 A 24 1 . 1 . 
1 e = - 1 1 = - * r 5 
Nee . 1 i, T r Ne * 1 
F * ik 1 T0 bh 
19 : 9 - 9 . e 7 . | 1 Sf +.F* by 4 | : Ys 
is n i ” 7 # 7 / CS. - &* C * * 
IF, 27 7 + 3-4 : I , 
. . 715 4 l N 11 
* Ne P 4. J ' *% * TRE: 
a * R 4 | 4 8 . q 4 y N 6 t 
T4 TY . K 1 1-3, | 1 
* *. + 4 = — * © Pp * —_ : _ * 
4 ** hy | pL l % t \ 4 Pe G * 
» 1 4 * ' 7 4 * ©. * * 2 
wo *, + 3 5 b N. e - 
j v 1 R . » = 7 93 ? 4 # l 1 * 1 * 
4 : © # U 4 $* : - 1 A LS 7 5 9 K 2 "a : 7. » » £ : Fs 5 F 4 l 4 0 
. * * 99 nn 5 . 6 $ 1 * . $4 3 L a As : 7 * ; „* = 7 1 . 3 
Nein n 2 7 - PAY 1045” Fog $4 £ $4 2 $ 3 14 ö — * THEE 4 * * 91 
* . * 1 5 4 f . 4 * ; 4 1 : 
, & - L \ N : * N 1 4 f 1 Fi * - * x PT , . \ F a 
T7 1£ wv : 7 A. 3 by % 4 7.4 K 3 4 . l " N Ladd * * g 
wb £ 2 1 l . 1 | . , * +" 44 * * p j 6 15 Ft 1 
i \ 1 * MH 1 8 ? > : » © F . . , 1 4 _—_— 
. 1 3 ; 2 v7 _ A ; 11 ö 5 j er. Wee 2 
k 4 : ö x lb 4 k \ 0 
. 4 1 1 py C 1 * I " 5 « 
171 r q T > Wy ' 2? - 4. * , - * . 
19 5 a 0 . ju 5 l 3 on » * p 
4 1 r 5 . j l * . | , *. - [ \ : ö fa . 4 
Bt 1 = | l : | [4 . 549 
My 3 5 8 Jn \ 4 : - | : kv | = , * : 
SICLS, ly. #4 3-2" 2 & * | * 5 ” o 1 1 - if hits 
. modum ne clementiſſimi Regis indulgentia, i ac illiberales artifices 
oF . 1 
1 * " . s - \ : 
: 29 * . - 
I vatum ſuum ma tur: Statutum eſt, nullus us in poſterum his 
61 hs W. 1 EX. 14 N * | 
4 +, V 1 . 1 is - * 7 * 
n . 1 22 - = . 9 9 . . 89 0 . 
| 975-2. © Prividepiis, aut Titulo i Uni 
e "Bf nIvVeri no I nl qui 
q * 1 * * 7 


nn fingulis Statutis & Ordinationibus circa regimen Typographorum, Domum Convoca- 
25. _Ctionis factis vel in poſterum edendis ſe fabmiſerit. f tag | off | ; 
>. _ _ Quoniam vero, in te Typographica uſu compertum eſt mechanicos hoſce artifices (lucri ſui 
compendium, cum diſpendio operis plerumque ſectantes) calligraphiz ſeu operis decori et * 

- | elegantiz minime ſtudere, fed opera quæque rudia ac inemendata in publicam lucem extru- 2 436 
dere ; idcirco preſenti ſtatuto cautum eſto, quod publice Univerſitatis Typographiæ, inſtru- 
ende in Domo aliqua huic uſui ſpecialiter deputata, præficiatur Architypographus unus ; vir 
———--.._ - - Gracis Latiniſque literis probe inſtructus, et in ſtudiis Philologicis verſatiſſimus; cujus munus 
+ -  _ erit, Operis Typographicis ibidem præeſſe, materiam five Suppelletilem Typographicam 
N (Chartam ſcilicet, Præla, Typos et alia hujus Opificii inſtrumenta) ut ſint in ſuo quæque 
ee, lectiſſima providere. In operibus e N Univerſitatis Ty pographia prodeuntibus, 
yporum modulum, Chartz qualitatem, Marginum menſuram preſcribere, Correctorum 
errata emendare; & alia quizcunque ad operis ornatum & perfeftionem ſpectantia fedulo 
curare, cui muneri quo alacrius & liberius vacet ( præter certam portionem lucri e Libris im- 
provenientis ipſi poſthac pro ratione ſymbolæ, quam ad publicæ Ty phiæ pecu- 
rum ſeu ſortem communem contulerit, aſſignandam ab iis qui a Domo Convocationis ad 
ordinanda Statuta T'ypographica delegandi erunt) Officium ſuperioris Bedelli in Jure Civili 
(utpote reliquis minus negotioſum) quandocunque primum quoquo modo yacaverit, perpe- 

tuo in poſterum um for e Statuto caatum 0. | 


— 4 — 900 8 
Statutum eſt, quod Procuratpres, in prima Congregatione poſt ſuſceptum officium, pro 
eng, de Magiſtroroum Regentium, ſeptemyJudices Delegatos nominent : quorum duo ; 
Sacræ Theologiz, unus juris, unus Medicine Doctor; & tres in Artibus Magiſtri (neceſſario | 
vel ad placitum Regentes) ſint; qui, ut Stati Delegati, cum approbatione illius Domus, 
cauſas omnes appellationum, a Cancellario ejuſque Vice-Cancellario five locum tenente, ad 
Domum 39-6. 2 ye devolutas, audiendi ac terminandi per totum annum inſequentem, 
poteſtatem habeant; ita tamen ut prorogetur & continuetur Juriſdictio Delegatorum quoad 
cCauſas coram iphs inceptas donec ſententiam tulerint, vel aliter finem impolnerint, & ſen- 
tentia executioni debite mandaverint. Ig | 


"118 


odque deinde, in proxima Convocatione, pro Domo Regentium & non Regentium, 
novem alios Judices Delegatos itidem nominent: quorum duo Theologiz, duo Juris, duo 
Medicinz Doctores, tres Magiſtri ad placitum Regentes ſint, qui ſimiliter, ut Stati Delegati, 
anno inſequente, cauſas appellationum a Domo Congregitionis ad Domum Conyocationis 
delatas, audiant & determinent ; prout ſupra conceſſum eſt Delegatis Congregationis, quoad 
cauſas intra annum inceptas anno inſequente determinandas. 

Et fi quempiam eorum qui fic nominati fuerint, deficere, vel diutinæ abſentiæ cauſam 
habere, vel ex juſta etiam cauſa recuſari contigerit, Procuratores, vel eorum alter, cum 
Domino Vice-Cancellario, alium ejuſdem Facultatis & Gradus fi talis in Univerſitate præſens 
fuerit, alias quemlibet alium (prout ipfis videbitur) in ejuſdem locum ſubſtituant. 


7 WT © = » 
— 77... ER AI rn > 


SF o 
* * 
| 4 4 


7 * 


"+ 
* 


[2 
2 


7 


ea 


— 
9 
4% 


of 
4. 


> 


* 
vS. £7 * 


- 


* 


2 
i & 


a 


4 4 K 
*£ 
Ge 


i; 


+> 3 


Pe 


5 


5 


n, 


r 


8 
5 
eint 


* 2 
„r 


n 


5 


„ 


> om 
= 


* „„ 
* 


* 
y +  _ 
w# 


* 4 . 1 Ag 


— ” «, 


r 


. > + tad l 
* 10. kn en N ade won buns: ls 
7 12-8 as ap ha ee inn. ee ee 
8 e 0 * neee e r en e bee i 
290 t N 4 8 FLY bands os BI. ERP * * ee *\ ®. 57 * "us: We e len 3 
N Poul) . Mn h es 25% 2 o „ eee T $4. e 5 <> 37” 
2 1 ©1950 v3 
2 521 os | 
Gre van?" 17 a7 Th A N en Nn 5 7 N 119; l bens gu 3 Nat AP 
Ny He 667 N 5 
enn n Bn ; 
i a T 


bs 97 is 


1 „ 
2 Pots 
„ 
. 
” 
— - 


wo 1 


** * 
4 

= 

* 

= 


o * 1 
* 


N 


—_— * 2 


dre be * N 8 BUN 8 ei ieee TY 


T 


=. F N of - 
e 
e LI 
1 5 ISL. 
> . e 4 3 | * 2 D 
7 +" N . 5 * We 8 7 
11 nnn ; 1 * 
. 28 71 " IS" 
74 N * 
, 52 l SS. * 
1 85 1 G 
1 
856 F 
=, 
i 


A ag e 
oo UA” A 5 "OY 


* 


* 


1 
* 
K 
* £10 3 8 Y « 
\ _—_ 8 % PC 
$ +. 7 
F 5 


* * 


7 | 
1 zh we TA eee conan 
i Meri e 2a Ip. e #1 de Alt or nas 1 *. FA N 


8 
* 

a 
* 
% 


— 
* ; 
"4 
Pg 
» 
WT 


Mn © ** a . 1. 8 | + 544 -4 r NaN $5714! M$ ty KH; a WS. 
— 9 ; Nr re Sz 
nee rn Hel“ 3 #3: l T% i; * xy n Hey | Tits 1 15 in. 2 — Iv | 
* n 4 12 25 


0 * 
3 
e 

4 
* - 

4 
* 

a 


ut 
x. 
* 
92 

5 I BR 
3 


LIT 

© "» 

l * 
* £ * 
e 
+, 5 
* 

— 
* 
* 


3 
15 


A by ? #-1%% * * 1 
dann Abi 354 Þ:; %%%. Hoxngt 2-214 54 - #84» 8 £5 Att 59 Rl RD) 2%, Sa * 


U 4 len 2 © Is cre Fm ng ee en e Gm e 


RY Tas 3 


Fi 
14 
* 
* 


oF 8 > 4 
* 


: * 


v * 34 


* 


7 * 755 | 


- 


- 
8 


— Mor We 
PF. 


N e 31541959) 4 AKW nite; eff „Nin 5 225 14. eff et Ni 33 

„b aasee dane 33. my — end be 31; page: p . cen 51585 8 N 

«1914 61d 3 9 ne & 5 £2 2 tir i 3%) $5 ¹¹ $014 > e S TER i 1 NtY; 115 4 8 N 
. N ks PU. RO Act Ana 8 een 8 527 S941 Wet „ 


12 DEE 4 10 + 4 AF 3. by 078 81 * - TH. Wb: 53S & 71 eg 
0 a 4 7 927 74 ZH gig: iy f e. 77 5; 
TING Siu N k. | 


l 


„ 1 x 4 1 
a 0 *. 


* 
| * 

= 

1 


„ a «% 


2 vp , cnc 


1001 26221 9} Hut 


9 
* 


1 vs 
c 


0 MO 


* 
i 


OOTY 


>» 


N 
«Iron, vo 


” # 

>» MW * mg © 
rern. 
th N « * $--. 1 4% ” F 


CY 


4 
* 


* 
* 


* 
S2 


a 


by 


A 


THE Pages 5 
S het et 6 


* * 
o 
: 
o 


7 850 


$i 4 
n 


« Cc 
%% 
ab I 
Fn wo 


* 2 <= he A SF 2 


— Py & 
a5 . 


"4 


LL R8&E 


* ' 


ey 2515 % ey 
A 
PTD 


_ 


| : l * 2 > 
ee N : 32 thx: 21 Ir? Ay erp POS * ASSESS: 
A Rn be | . 3 x Pop % 4 LS 
* . e it | Bac d N Rien e 483 ws ; TE 
* N A: „ . » \ | } 4 Ja N 7 83 * 5 Ty * 
"a £ 8 F 55 > 7 257-18 CI... 2 . = | 
| * W Foe Bol "x * 3 8 — A * 741 1 2 9 5 8 
e | 2 3 wy. | RE Bn Bo 
7 e aut; * HT: «rm a 72 , ty 1 4 wi 9 . e * * & 
400 ny hl, d g 83's 39 4 | de e td Ni GO | 
- 4 1 
Nan ations * ei is 2 «1 Sz 5 =” | 
e 1 iu $57 : 4 e 5 * WE: 14 
* +: —_ 5 Wage 1 © © op 
*7% 8 N 8 3 ner ee -& + Slit PTY * BY br 
7 4 * 1 — 8 
en A Ab oral mouth eee eee epi, 4. . 
. 0 i. - þ# 
FS EF 2 5 I der kh na ie, (1/08 "Rf as bs AVG? 48 « | 8 I 
8; * 8 3 oF 8 8 
WY 72 e ae dee e e ee eee 1 
4 bh - w of * . 
8 8 3 . 5 7 ein 3 * ee 7 x 1 e 
| ah CBT 2s Se SN 
| 25 2 . 1 x, ti e 8 ert 1er | ihe Iixtag fit ub A upto 8 +; 1 
: 7 = 95 / 8 - — 
28 1 inn 2 34 5 1 . W442 4028371 AL oli Sil Ivor - 3 EE RS r 
. ee * 9 
ei 11 119 Rect 8 N 1 n ” Ter; ina ts 42 el + "ot #1270 $1.55 Sz 7 ; Gf 3 
CS | : 5 > ES . 
„ 7; A LL i) ert At K S 12098 15 AGF ln WIN 654 Gus ES $72. A PROT I 
_ , : | op 3 = <4 : 2 , 
3 ng] 5 EIA 1 1 n NS 11485 45 8 7 115 yo 2 1 16.634 £%Y Q2 570, 4d 
_ KD 5 8 f 2 
SES” „ N LEST SE "8; 25 $34 P * 45 An. ii Pf (508 wh 31361 $9043, 
ö Ip Ay. * 4 FR <1 
* e, E's 67 45 157 2 2 £4 ae; 1 8 1p ine Nh 1 4 
. 10 7 EY {+ 7088005 NDS £11563 bitte 1 * 1 4-4 | 
$i oy 24 a N 446528 an 63 4 1151 abi 11 n e- 14 98 
"3. 
8 400 5 ig it's mes ide 24 2 0 Tat lim: up 55 14 n I 
Ds BOW 5 eee 
7 4 4 X ** =” " T4 : N WA” 
42 * "+ wp 3s ALS. 2 1 Mt gs on NES 
Big, j 1 8 . „„ TTY 14G 4 ©": 5% nad | 
* 4.» ; * Rnd 1 * ” 29 7 44 A 4 . : ; 7 1 Fer *. £8 "5 * % oy 2 by 
e 7 7 * pales JT. ß ED 
I 6 2 * 7 ; w- FF 4 x mee” > IPL ” > . 12 88 4; 9 F<; 2 | 8 bl "ap . 2 pho | 
7 2 4 Pers 43 * * |; 4 «4 ; ty : 4 L 1 77 . 858 3 * 8 2 TEES 7. © Me 92 : 
* \ p £79 24 8 1” ' TS ö * . 4 1 7 » "57 #2 -4 TIES = ws 8 t | 
4% i, Long COMET SO. i ES OE IEEE ZE NT 
n 3 R „ TA ̃ ᷣͤ ͤ.. ⅛ Ä; 
W. l & EBNCST of to rs Te hee b6 27 TEES 
2 ” 3, 5 ** « 5 * f ** j . * : "4 * — > 2 Sk x * 
14 fy" . F , t / BE or oat 
1 * : 1 p | 5 1 5 | : * N * * 1 O 5 x at $ * = ny a 5 on + " = 
8 REY Cc i ! 
FFF 5 e 1 4. | 
* n © k EE « 3 ier 
a % 3 7 LN Hi Fe WP: v8 * ; 7 * 15 7 oo 9 50 4 | 5 „ 
4 * 2 4 4 "% 


27 
— > E 2 
n 27 
ER #1 2 „ * 
1 , X 79 
1 * * q 
4 * 4 K af 
8 | 8 F * . . 2 * aL 
* LIES, 7 PM - * nx * 
Y I i WD. «& .£Y 
4 8 3 {13.4 J; 
2 I 


i 


— 


* 


r 


