KT 
8 
2 
1 
* * = \ 
» 
1 ** 
7 wa, 1 
1 A 2 +; * 1 
8 - 52 
N 7 _. 
tt 2 — 8 
* EY £ 
. „ 
» ki y * 
wy or EZ LI 
N — 
1 1 3 
* * ISS -\.-, 
"AS 4 08 
— : . 
FEATS n 
9 » n 
_ \ 8 . 
* [| 0 #2 "6 
23% N 
Y n 
* "A "Is 3 8 
7 N * 
* 6 x BOOT? 
4 4 
- 4 4 
4 - " rs 0 
* 4 
9 i . 
39 y ("hf * 
4 . „ 
RE 5 "A WM; 
xy -— 
5 C , 3 
i * * 
3 1 LTD 3 I 
\ $ 3 
8 1 1 
= W 
y FL. . A. 
8 # Os 1 
5 N „ * 
4 bas * 2 
8 * 99 | 
Ws k r 
* 1 7:2 
7 ; 1 Leh 
* «Shy IRS, 
= 4 * > 1 
Fm N 7 . 
n ISM, 
WER x 7 2 * 8 
E's k i . 
_ 7 ** 8 
a. ab 8 
. * ö 
. bf Ta, 
8 $5 * 
x c . 
e G * 
88 o 
3 5 
by of £ C14 * 
214 1 8 
: - z Ch 
n * 
* 8 1 
” I WoX! 
\ 2 26. Mes 83 
1 5 KS 
Ce Oe 1 5 
. 3 N 
4 
+ : EI) 
$ " c # I 
* A * . 
n * * 
g > 4 832 
y 4 * * 4 * 
- 9 23 5 
5 3 
; 0 1 mt | 
x 24:5 *% 
8 5 
ts WW A 8 f 
ö Fes * 8 138 
1 Wo" m_ 
\ SET 
JON x * * 
c 3 & 3 
Tp r ** 2 
7% « > Ht 
f : \ * ef” 
FF: „ 
f , Ws 33-7 
ESL I 
* 3 7 4 
N : 2 
3 2 
* N 
3 
3 


5 5 - is . «s 
3 oy cy , , * =" 
EX 8 - 

* 3 / «> 

= D * 

8 * „ $ t 

. pF 44 - I 
8 4 N * * 

* . ER... 

JM 4 we, 1 z 33 . by ; : 

FL [3 9 . n 5 

* r "Oh 2 5 

. a 5 . . 1 

Tp ; 3 N 

286 . . 

BY - 2 0 5 N Th . 4 

«1 . 25 2. © 22 

* ; © | 3 

7 . 8 7 

A. 2 > $ 5 

4 | | : E 555 0 tre and. 

* A . 1 > £ en 25 > N : 
* 4 2 1 ERS 5 
1 N P 
1 * 


1 


— 


5 I illiam Bal 8 FE 
. up On the Demiſe of | YO bington, Ws wk 


"EY H 2" Wit | elle; 


pr Right Honourable |, 
Jo Ford Baron off Plaintiff 


92 1 


1 07 on d 2 vit of hw 7. a Judgment if Reverſal 


3 the Exchequer Chamber in Ireland, of a 
—_ "Ts! Sven for the Plamtiff, in Ejedment, in 
_ the _ g Exchequer, in the JO: K iy 


5 1 N WS 5 - ** 4 * - 
. 3 : a * 
I 7 
— 5 * * 2 . * 
"8 l Z 5 
"a I'S 0 
J 8 1920 : $ [ # — 
ol — + R 
485 1 > - 1 2 S . 4 
= 3 * — 
s ; x i 2 js - - : N / 
—_ BY" SI + N | * 2 
1 6 > 7 4 -p 5 * 
8 8 2 * 2 * 
T 2 4 3s - 8 i = 
LAKE . va. , , " : 
A * 1 
7 5 N * 4 a 
2 0 
i. % g : 
g . * iS) - 
bY : . — 4 
| J W : 
v + T3 25 
2 75 3 . \ * 
2 5 7 * * 3 F 
Ai ws. - 0 
: 1 , mY * 
2 8 1 * : . F *« = x b 
* . * - + , 4 ” 
4 * v 
P 
" & 


HE ſaid Lord Ringſton brought an Ejectment 7riniy Term, 1715: 
againſt the Defendant in the Court of Exchequer 

in Ireland, in the Name of his nominal Plaintiff, 

the ſaid James Holborne againſt the ſaid William 4 
Babbington, for Thirty Meſſuages, Thirty Cottages, Thirty 
Gardens, Three Orchards, Two Hundred Acres of Meadow, 
Two Hundred Acres of Paſture, Two Hundred Acres of 
Arable Land, One Thouſand Acres of Mountain, Two Hun- 
dred Acres of Wood and Underwood, Two Hundred Acres 
"2 of Moor, and Two Hundred Acres of Furze and Heath, with 
in the Appurtenances in the Town and Lands of Curragbmore, 
» alias Glanduffe, in the County of Corke, upon a Leaſe made 
bj the ſaid Lord King ſton for Twenty-one Years, from the 

25th Day of March, 1713. 


THE Defendant pleaded not Guilty. 


AT the Aſſizes held at Cork the 5th Day of March, 1713, Aſſizes at Cork; 
g the ſaid Cauſe was Tried, and a Verdict given the the r, 1713: 
= . Plaintiff. ” 
At the ſaid Aſſizes, when the Cauſe came to be heard, Defendant's Chal-.. 
the Defendant did in Writing challenge the Array of the Pan: 3 
nel of the Jury, returned by the Sheriff, to Try the ſaid J. 
Cauſe, becauſe the ſaid John Lord Baron of Kingſton, Lefſor 


of 


” EO 42 


bo. I's 1 & 7 TY * * 1 k. ye. n Pr T7, REY * N 
x . 4 . Rs \ 5 ee 45 gs 2 N RT.) 7 YATES * 9 2 * 2 Y KORS 2 9 
” : * : ao SETS I. STE) SAILS 317 Fan "PI F N en - 
L - \ C Fe + N * 1 9 L - * * 7 * ee Pi 0 
8 x 4 ; i q e 2 
+4 0 "voi." N. U A? * r * * * WI 66 N J ie, «a 484 I 1 
. er. WON . . 7 T P44 ry 
* Ay Z \ 74 N »# 7 o i J 
1 1 en N * Y 5X 
7 * n, 0 p : ' F 
, < 1 * * - 7 5 7 * 
N , * * * * S . - 1 9 
5 1 „ 95 ; \ [3 9 N. kay 1; 8 5 _—_ . + 4 "y 
l 0 0 * * 1 W . | . Y ; 4 4 by 75 
% x 7 5 : A = 1 
- þ | * ( | * 7 \ ' ; : 55 4 
1 x 
44 * . . , ' . ; F 8 « > ; my $ ; 1 
; p ; 5 ö 6 g w 2 : Va 7 
; 2 f : A - 0 . 
y d, 2 ö H by 
* * * ” 1 2 ? - 4 
* . IE 
i - * 
0 * 8 Y $ : 
8 1 0 5 i ' 
: : . I , 
6 . Us 7 . * * 
, f 8 * y 0 1 
: \ e c 0 * 
1 9 
g - 


- the ſaid Parties, as by the Yd of Treland ought to have been 


done; and thereupon prayed Judgment, and that the ſaid 


_ Pannel might be quaſhed, 


X 


Phintif'sDemurrer TO which Plea of Challenge to as fla of « ſaid | 


to the Challenge. 
Ns Pannel, the Plaintiff did demurr in Law. 


Defendants Joinder | THE Defendant did thereupon join in Demurrer. | 
in Demurrer, 


Challenge Over- UPON: hearing Council on both Sides at the ſaid Aſſizes, 
VCC blk did Over-rule the ſaid Challenge, and proceeded to 
Swear the ſaid Jury, and to Try the ſaid Cauſe in Ejectment. 


Bill . TH ER E uP ON the Defendant prayed a Bill of Ex. 


ceptions, which was granted by the ſaid Judges of Aſſize, 


and the Judges returned the Record of the ſaid Verdict into 


the Court of Exchequer in Ireland, at the Day in Bank in 


Enter Term, 1714. Eaſter Term then next following ; 1 and thereupon, on the ſame 


Day, the Defendant produced in the ſaid Court, the (aid Bill 
of Exceptions, which at his Requeſt was Inrolled and Entred 


upon Record after the ſaid Verdict, and yore the Final 4 J 


r Judgment in this Cauſe, 


THE ſaid Court of Exchequer 3 Council upon the 


ſaid Bill of Exceptions, and notwithſtandiug the ſaid Bill of 


Trinity Term, 1714. Exceptions, did in Trinity Term 1714, proceed to give Final 
Judgment in the ſaid Cauſe, that the Plaintiff ſhould recover 


his ſaid Term of, and in the ſaid Tenements, and alſo his 


Damages and Coſts. 1 
Miczelnas Tem, T HERE UPON the Defendant brought a Writ of Error 


l Exchequer Chamber i in Ireland, returnable in M. chaelmas 
. Term 1714. | 
 Michaelmas ren, UPON hearing Council on both Sides in the Exchequer © 
e Chamber, the ſaid Judgment given in the Exchequer Court 


in Freland, Was Reverſed. 


UPON this Judgment of Reverſal, the Plaintiff . now 
brought this Writ of Error. 


THE Principal, if not the only Queſtion in this Cauſe is, 
Whether the Challenge to the Array of the Pannel is s good in 
Law or not ? 


IT 


Of the Plaintiff. : at ls Tine of 4 "OS of = Tad Panne E 
== alſo at the Time of the ſaid Tryal, was one of the - 
Lords and Peers of the ſaid Kingdom of Ireland, and that 
the Array of the ſaid Pannel, was Arrayed by Matthew Deane, 
Bart. then Sheriff of the ſaid County of Corke, which faid 
Marthe lad not named or returned any Knight i in the ſaid 
Array of that Pannel, to Try the Iſſue then joined between 


8 * oe, - 
— 933 2 — 95 4 i 


XI. i . — 5. oo * bo Thy . Mo ' ; 
1 * Reg 1 * 4 % 4 £ Ft 
4 4 8 - G 8 
* ee . 7 { ; 
1 KY * 4 Fas p 
5 . | | | 
HI St PE... . 5 4 J g iy 7 
1 2 . r ＋ q : - y . . a 
5 8 I N 5 Ne Ks * 1 * * N 4 
a n ; Ot l : + 
+ M6 , * Son SLED 8 
l wh”. 541 58 WY \ N 
1 * 1 8 + 4 s 
y . . 
Was x + FAN Pad 1 1 y 
i 45 6. SUL ot - n 1 , 
7 * 99 44 = + 
A.” Ne r 8 0 1 . * 
- = 22 F n þ — 
. 1 1 - f „ © : d q p 
_ oy N 8 4 4* 5 4 - 
= 7 = Yor l IS - 0 i 1 o . 
NR 5 LE N 4 HH , x 
8 * 5 . * Foes} 
\ * ASE e . > « 
($250 . Po Ry . MN . 
- ay l 1 82 * 4 8 
g 2 2 n 
4 I 4 2 * WB is! 8 
+ LF 1 * 1 1 
* * F 
oO 1 þ 
PA vi * — "4 
- 
= | i 


—_— againſt à Peer, there muſt be a Knight returned on the 


. "Box ; e „ r 3 2 f 
4 o . REP br x 2 5 4 . WT : : 4 
o 108 4 FL HS 5 * , 9 — N Ls ; ! 5 a 
bs WY 2 8 ds Kin! S wy | we y nn : WE n 
| Ys | e 1 + 7 ö iN 
12 1 * 4 WELL * wes % 
5 4 FA 4 7 4.5 i ad” be * - * Pg 
kX * * 
ö . JF * N , : 
a 4 - 4 
«7 y * 1 1 * 8 . 
« - - * a 
4 K J 
* * T ; 
4 * "oy * 
1 . 
,* * 
* & . 
* * 8 
9 * 4 
- ; 
: 
» . , . — 
. 
4 
* 


is humbly hoped, 


oped, That the judgment of Reverſal 
woas well given in the Exchequer Chamber; becauſe it is a 
Fanown Rule of Law, that in every Action brought 5 or 


ury. 
And the Challenges, in ſuch Caſe, for want of a Knight, he 
been often known in Experience to prevail, made by the Peer, 
or any Party to the Suit. That the Challenge, therefore, in 
this Caſe, being Over · ruled by the Juſtices of Aſſize erroneouſly; 
(as is humbly apprehended,) and the Verdict being taken 
' thereupon, and the Judgment founded on that Verdict, the 
Defendant had good Reaſon to bring a Writ of Error; and 
it is hoped, that the Judgment was well Reverſed. 


| Wherefore, for theſe and ſeveral other 
Reaſons, the Defendant humbly inſiſts, 
That the Judgment of Reverſal in the 
Exchequer Chamber was well given, and 
prays, That the ſaid Fudement of Reverſal . 
may be Affirmed. 5 8 


dw. Northey, 
Tho. Lutwyche. 


82 


e 


* 


. * 
* «2 " 


* 


r 1 | 9 
DR I EET ION CCC 


- 


— 


* 
F 


eee R P 


* * 3 nt 
- * 


4 on 


14 
d . 
74 


— 


* 


O 
＋ 
ed 
_ 
ed 
$43 
— 
＋ 
D 
5 


2 

| I Bm. JP 

h 'W; J 8 . A 
= IJ oy SD | ww : 
he J + 8 L 

oa 2, S 1 

2 1 bags 

1 5 5 8. 


: 8 "BAY k . 4 wo f : TAY 2 3 Ms 1 8 4 : ; 
ne We» „ e 2 oy Iu Agr apoio te oo I NI a R ih * "ates SI *- 3 : ; 
| . N N bk W x 7 % Dr * *. 7 9 wa 4 + Ab 0 ds 8 , at. 2 25 * <2 1 
; f ' 4 ref N a Wees eee $5 er orgs Sonar 
8 * 23 ; 
f * 
2 1 : 
; b 
* 


* 


8 

64, 

- 2 
1 i 
* 


* 
= 
te 
” 
. 
4 
. 
5 
* 


