Inſtructor Clericalis. 
_ The Fifth and Laſt Part. 
BEING A 


|[CONTINUANCE 


B ARS. 


AND OTHER 


PLEADINGS, 


From the Four tu Part. 


WHE-R EIN 

The BAR Ss and PLEADING s in Deb, 
Detinue, Quare Impedit, Replevin, Treſpaſs, 
Trover, and Maſt, are continued either 
by Precedents of, or References to, all the 
Pleadings extant reſpecting the ſame. 


Wich Variety of Notes, Arguments, and other 
Obſervations thereunto relating. 


Jn Two Dotumes. 
. 


F R. G. a Clerk of the Court of Conmon-Pleas, 


— ——_— 


In the & WF VOY: 

printed by J. Nuft, Aſſignee of Eduard Sayer Eſq; 

for J. Malthoe in the Middle-Temple Cloiſters, and 
at his Shop in Stafford. 1713. 


& ak hd 


Mi 


hn 


. 


* 


* 


4- 


8 3 


we. 


Inſtructor Cleri calis. 


PART V. 


VOL I. 


— — 


Bar al Adm per al Adminiſtrationem com- 


aſs M. qui dedit Def generalem Re- 
laxation, Ge. | 


* Ebt ſur Obl' per Adm', Bar per Bar. 

2p aliam Adminiſtrationem commits 
M. qui dedit Def? genera Relaxation, 
© Repl ꝗd' ſecunda Adminiſtratio obtent' fuit Rep! per 
per fraudulent” ſuggeſtion', & Relaxatio ſact' Fraudem. 
fuit per fraudem, Rejoinder proteſt, &c. pro Rejo', qa! 
* placito qd' M. bona fide relaxavit Def & boua fide. 
© travers' le Fraud' & Iſſue inde. And the 1 
Court adjudged the Iſſue inepte & proceſs vacui, Repleader 
and a Repleader was awarded from the Plea. agatd. 
The Plaintiffs reply, and ſhew both the Admi- nb 
niſtrations; and that the Adminiſtration com- AP Repb & 
mitted to MA. by Sentence declaratory of the Demur'. 
Archbiſhop was made invalid, whereby - the 


Releaſe alſo was void. Defendant demurs. 
Winch, Ent, 311, 


Cc 28 


386 


Bat. 


Bar ratione 
bonorum 
Notabil'. 


Executor to 
pay Money 
according to 
Teſtator's 
Will. 


— 


Bar al ſuit de Executors & 


24 Imeſtat habuit bona notabilia, Et ides 
Lettre Adminiſtration' Def revocat, Gc. 


. P ſpredict' S. per W. P. Attorn ſuum 
. ven & defend” vim & injur' quan- 
© do, &c. Et dic' qd predict T. Action non, 
© Quia dic' qd? R. qui objic inteſtat' habuit 
© bona notabilia in divers Dioces' infra Pro. 
© vinc* Cant? fcilt* in Dioces' L. & Dioces? N. 
per quod Adminiſtratio omnium bonorum 
© jur' & credit que fuerꝰ predict R. tempore 
© 'mortis ſue & que eidem S. per J. P. Legum 
Dcorem' per totum Archidiaconat' S. ac vil 
© de Curia ſancti Edmi' Commiſlional* & Of- 
* ficial' litimeꝰ conſtitut' in: Loco Ordinarii 
© ſecundo die Nov. Anno Regni Regis Jac. 2. 
© 3. apud B. ſancti E. predic? commiſſa ſuit 
* penitus vacua eſt & nullius effectus in Lege 
© reman', &c. Vide Clift. Em. 3 50. | 
J. * Similis Bar de Adminiſtratione commiſs 
* per Archiepum ratione Bonorum Notabil', 


Et Rep! qd Inteſtate tempore mortis non 


© habuit bona notabilia in divers Diocels, 
© 3 Bro. 140. See after, Bar per Exec', &c. 

J. © Similis Bar & Adm' al A. qui Def re- 
© laxavit, 2 Bro. 98. | 


. Debt by an Executor upon a Bond, with 
Condition to pay Money to fuch Perſons as 
the Teſtator named by his Will. Bar, That 
the Teſtator did not name any Perſons to 
whom the Money ſhould be paid. Repl', That 
the Teſtator by his Will made the Plaintiffs 
Executors, who prov'd it; and that the De- 
ſendant had not paid them the Money. De- 
fendant demurs. Vide Winch, Ent, 228, 

2 Del 


60 


* 


Adminiſtrators in Debitoꝰ 387 
. © Def* dic' qd' ſolvit Teſtatori per manus Solvir per 


© alterius ante diem ſolution', Repl' non & manu alte 
g Iſſue, Clerks Aſſiſt. 314. * Tus. 


Al ſuit per Adm' ſur Bill' penal', Deſ' Q# Inteſtate 
* placitat' qa” le Inteſtate fuir Felo de ſe. Se. fuit Felo de 
* cund* Bro, Met. 2 24. ſe. 


. Simile 1 Saund, 355, Cc. upon a Scire Similis Bar, 
Facias, by T. Adminiſtrator of 7. againſt E. Qd' Inteſtar 
to have Execution of a Judgment for 2000 ＋ Felo 
and 21. Damages recovered by the Inteſtate ; 
againſt the Defendant E. The Defendant pleads 
in Bar of the Execution, That the ſaid Inreſtate. 
after the Judgment hanged himſelf, and be- 
came Felo de ſe, and lo found by the Coroner's 
Inqueft return'd into the King's-Bench, where. 
by the Inteſtate had forfeited the Debt and 
Damages to the King. The Plaintiff replies, Rep? per 
and ſhews a general Act ot Pardon after the 3 . 
Felony committed, by Force whereof the ſaid 8. JudiC' poo 
Debt and Damages were diſcharged of any Def. 
Forfeiture by the ſaid Offence, &c. The De- 
fendant demurr'd ; and the Judgment was gi- 
ven againſt the Plaintiff upon this Reaſon, 

That when the Inquiſition was return'd into the 
King's. Bench, which found him Felo de ſe, then 
the Debt and Damages were veſted in the 
King, and by the Act he had not granted Re- 
ſtitution to the Plaintiff the Adminiſtrator, and 


that there ought to have been a Reſtitution. 
Idem 362, 363. 


Debt upon a Bond by an Adminiftrator : Bar, That 


Defendant pleads, That the Inteſtate was at- — 


ö e inted 
tainted of Burglary upon a Gaol-delivery at the —— 


Old. Baih, with Averment that the Judgment is 
in full Force, and of the Identity of the Perſon. 
I Lut. 619, &c. Cc 2 Debt 


388 Bar al ſuit de Executors & 


Debt pro Vid' Exec R. vers' Exec' H. 


Bar qd' Quer poit mortem R. cepit in virum 
Hi. per quod debitum deven extinF', Se- 
cundum, Aſt. 256. (als 224.) ut ſe- 


quit ur. 


a etal L Fr ptedict' Def, &c. Action' non, 
— Inter- ; E &c. quia dic qd* poſt confection 
marriage. ſcripti predict, prelat' R. T. in vita ſua 
* apud' C. predict' condidit teſtum' & 

* ule? voluntar ſua in ſcriptis ac per idem 

* Teſtum' ſuum predict' E. Executricem Teſt!” 

* 1 conſtituit & ordinavit & poſtea obiit, poſt 

* Cujus mortem eadem E. predict' Teſtum 

F predict R. T. in deba' juris forma probavit 

© ac onus execution Teſti” ill' ſuper ſe ſuſcepit, 

Et poſtea & ante diem impetrac' brevis Orig' 

© ipſius E. ſcilt' 10 die Jan' Anno Regni dicti 
Domini Regis nunc Angb' primo, eadem E. 

apud C. predict' cepit in viru' prefat' J. H. ac 

© ro'neinde tam o es Actiones ſuper pred? ſcript 

Obl' hend' quam predict' debitum 10 l. ſuper 

predict' ſcript' Ob! petit penitus in Lege 

extinct' fuer & exon at deven', Et adhue 

exon' at exiſtunt, Et hoc, &c. Unde, 


* &6, 


© The Bar was by Ri. Lee. Ro. T. & W. W. 
Exec Teſti” Jacobi Halliwell ad E. Halliwell. 


* Vid' Executric? Teſti? Ro. Ttorp, ſur Obb. 


” © ny __ 1 a. —_— ED 5 


aan TER Bo WO 


3 , Db -Y 


ſua ante confection” ſcripti predict” ſciltꝰ p 


Adminiſtrators in Debito. 389 


Debt by Executors for Arrearages of an An. 
nuity granted by Deed for Service dope, 


and to be done, by the Teſtator. 


7 . T predict W. Aion? non, &c. Quia Bar, that the 


0 n 2 | 1 za vita Teſtator re- 
dic' qd' predict T. F. als L. in vita N 


Br 
mo die N. Anno 42 Eliz. apud L. in Paroch' 


& Warda predict' de ſerviebat predict W. 
in ſervitio, vocat' a Common Serving. man, 
per {ex menſes extunc prox* ſequen', Qd'qz 
© poſt confe&tion' ſcripti predict” {cilt? primo 
* die Martii Anno, &c. 7. predict W. apud 
L. in Paroch' & Ward' predict requilivie pre- 
© dit” T. ad deſerviend' eidem W. in ſervitio 
predict quod facere predict T. adtunc & 
ibm' recuſavit, Qd'ꝗq; poſt eund' primum 
© diem M. Anno 7. ſupradicto pred' T. in vita 
© ſua non ſerviebat eidem W. in ſervitio pre- 
dict, Et hoc parat' eſt verificare, &c. 
© Precludi non, quia dic' qd? predictꝰ T. F. Repł, Qd' ob- 
* als L. in vita ſua fcilt predict” primo die M. tulit Servic 
* Anno 7. ſupradicto apud L. in paroch* & & Def“ recu- 
Ward' predict' obtulit ad deſerviend' eidem — 
W. in ſervitio predict', quod acceptare idem 
W. adtunc & ibm' & ſemper poſtea penitus 
recuſavit, Ablqz hoc qd' predict' T. in vita 
© ſua recuſavit ad deſerviend' eidem W. in 
© ſervitio predict' prout idem W. ſuperius 
© allegavit, Et hoc parat' eſt verificare, Unde 
+ per judic' & debicum ſuum predictꝰ unacum 
© dampnis, &c. ſibi adjudicari, &c, Et Iſſue 
ſue le Traverſe, Vide Af. Ent. 248, &c. 


Debt upon a Bond by Executors, Bar by 3 


ſpecial Agreement of Compoſition with the f Compoſi- 
C3 Teſtator, tion. 8 


390 


Repl'. 
Demur'. 


Debt by an 
Adminiſtra- 
tor of R. B. 
citing an Act 
of Parlia- 
mene, and 
that the Ad- 
miniſtra ors 
of R. B 
moul un t be 
deprived, &c. 


Defendant 
demurs, Cc. 


2. Whether 
the Lands 
here were 


Perſonal As- 
ſets. 


Bar al ſuĩit de Executors & 


Teſtator, and other his Creditors, &c. to go 
and come, &c. without Arreſt, provided that 
the Deſendant aſſigned and ſecured to the 
Uſe of bis Creditors all the Profits of the 
Tythes of the Rectory of S. as Councel in 
the Law ſhouid deviſe. That V. B. the 
Defendant's learned Councel, deviſed a Letter 
of Attorney, Cc. Repl', Proteſt that the 
Plea is inſufficient. Pro placito, that the Let- 
ter of Attorney is not a reaſonable Aſſignment; 
and traverſes that the ſaid V. B. is a Councellor 
at Law. Demurter thereupon, and Judgment 
for the Plaintiff. Yide 1 Lut, 678. Er Do 


Demur”. 350. 


Declaration, as Adminiſtrator of R. B. up- 
on a Bond made by Sir J. H. and that Sir F. H. 
being ſeized in Fee of Lands in Bermudas, 
he, to defraud his Creditors, covenanted with 


the Defendants to ftand ſeized to the Uſe of 


A. B, in Tail general, Remainder to his righe 
Heirs, &c. and ſhews a private Act of Parlia- 
ment concerning the ſaid Lands, and a Pro- 
viſo, That the Act ſhou'd not deprive the Ad. 
miniſtrators of R. B. the Inteſtate, &c. De- 
murrer thereupon, and Judgment for the De- 
fendants, becauſe the Mater compriz'd in the 
Declaration was only Matter of Truſt, and 
meerly proper for a Court of Equity, in 


which the ſaid A. B. ought to be a Party. | 
1 Lut, 623. But nothing was ſaid by the Court 


expreſly, whether the Lands were in the Nature 
of Perſonal Aſſets, Oc. or not; and the 


Caſe of Noel and Robinſon, 2 Ven, 358. was 


cited, to piove that the Lands here were as 
Perlonal Aſſets. Vide 1 Lut. 626, 


I Deb 


* 


aa dS ow 


MH 5 tA ek” mM 6 6) waa 


Adminiſtrators in Debito. 


351 


Debt upon a Devaſtavit, and declares Narr' upon a 
that the Plaintiffs obtain'd a Judgment for Devaſtavit. 


Debt, c. againſt the Deſendant and 4. then his 
Wife, Executrix of F. and ſhews that the Debt 
is unpaid; and ſhews the Death of A. and 
Judgment afterwards given to have Execution 


againſt the Defendant alone by his Default; 


and that no Execution was as yet ſued out; and 
then ſets forth, that the Defendant, in the 
Life-rime of A. waſted the Goods of the Teſta- 
oy of to the Value of the Debt, per quod, &c. 


Detendant demurs to the Declaration, and Defendant 


Cc. And as to the principal Caſe here, vide 
Ent. and Wither's Caſe, 1 Ven. 321. Brown 
and Collins's Cafe, 2 Lev. 110. Aſtrey and 
NeviPs Caſe, 133. Burrell and Richmond's Caſe, 
Carter 2. Sir Brian Tuck's Caſe, 3 Leon 241. 
In which Cale it is reſolved by all the Barons 


Judgment for the Defendant. Vide x Lut. 670, demurs. 


in the Exchequer, That an Executor of an If Execwor 
Executor ſhall not be charged with a Devaſta- of Executor 


vit made by the Executor of the firſt Teſtator, 
Imo in le Caſe de Roy pur ceo que eſt un perſonal 
Tort Solement. Sed Vide Stat. 4 & 5 Ann. ca. 16, 


\ HP LY 2 N n cad Jo We Gat 32660 a 


ſhall be 
charged with 
« De vaſtavit. 


322 gar in Debt per 


" ef 


wo —_— 


wi þ 4 £5% & : a? 
9 


Bar in Debt per Executors & 
| Adminiſtrators. 


1. By Abatement, That the Teſtator was 
alive at the Time of the Writ purchaſed. 
1 Lut. 13. Simile 16. Et vide Do@ 
Demur 247. Et vide ante Bar vers' 
Exec & Adny. Aarne. 


Abatem' de Bill, for that another Executor not 
named adminiſtred, together with the Defen- 
dant, ut ſequitur. 


Abatement. . EN predict' Def? per A. B. Attorn' 
5 0 ſuum ven' & defend' vim & injur', 
Et pet judic de Billa predict', quia dic' qd' 
predict T. E. per ultimam voluntat' ſuam, 

© ordinavit & conſt ituit quendam J. S. Execu- 

© torem Teſti ſui predict ſimulcum prefat' 

© Def” & obiit, qui quidem J. S. apud C. pre- 

* dic in Com' predict' adminiſtravit bona & 

© catalla que fuer predict” T. E. cum prefat' 

© Def” Unde ex quo preſat' J. S. in Billa pre. 

dict non noiat Idem Det? pet Judic' de Billa 

& predict', Et SO ua cafſer, &s 

» 3.1 Et predict Quer dic' qq! per aliqua per 
abs neg * predic? Def ſuperius placitando 2 
Edminüflra⸗ © Billa ſua predict' caſſari non debet, Quia dic 
vir. * q@& predi& J. S. poſt mortem predict Teſta. 
* toris aliqua bona ſeu catalla que fuer? ejuſdem 

5 Teſtatoris nunquam adminiſtravit, Et hoc 

| > $0 <4 EST es 6 

. f pet 


a eo. ˙ » ö - @, ab 


] 1 


Exccutors & Adminiſtrators. oo ' 


© per” qd inquirat per Priam', Et predict 
f Def? lilic', &c. Vide Thompſ. Ent. fol. 1. 


Et predict? Def” per J. L. Attorn' Aliter fur 

* fwuum ven & defend” vim & injur', quando, Bill. 
© &c. Et pet judic' de Billa predict'. Quia 
* dic' qq* predict A. per dict Teſtum' & 
* pit? voluntar' conſtituit & noiavitꝰ quendam 
R. Coexecutorem ſimulcum predict T. W. 
* Teſti ill' Qui quidem R. deo tempore pro- 
* ſecution* dict' Bill? & adhuc ſuperſtes & 
in plena vita exiſtit videlt' apud B. in Com' 
D. Et hoc, &c. Unde pro eo qd' idem R. 
* non noiat' in predict' Billa idem T. pet' 
* zudic' de Billa illa, &c. Hanſ. Ent. 102, 


my 


f. © Aliter ſur breve. Vide 2 Mo. Intr. 18. 


Note, In Abatement many Precedents be- Sure Defence 
ſin, Ven ch defend vim & injur quando, &c. _ 
ut it is obſerved in 1 Lut. 8, 9. that the ſure Abatement. 
A Way is to make Defence in this Manner, Ven 
* & Defend” vim & injur, without ſaying more: 
ls And where, in 2 Lat. 1590, the Defendant 


I- began his Plea without any Defence, wiz. 
it Et predict J. per T. W. Att' ſuum ven & pet” 
e- | auditum brevis, & c. and then pleads in Abate- 


& ment, and upon Demurrer it was held good. 
at And 1 Lut. 7. inter Walford & Saville, it was 
e- adjudged a good Plea without Defence upon 
Ila a ſpecial Demurrer, Eo d predict E. in placito 

| ſuo predict null fecit defenſinem, & c. See more 
er in 3 tr. Cler. laſt pub. 11, 12, Cc. And 


t. Note, That by Netw. 2 10. where the ordinary 

ic; full Defence ought to be made, and is omitted, p. iure of 
ta. it is laid to be a Failing in Subſtance, Subſtance. 
m 3 ks 4 8 0 4 | . WET. 

oc 


. 7 2 


394 


—— ad 
reve per 
Archiep um. 


har in Debt per 


Et predict Archiep'us per T. H. At- 
© torn? ſuum ven' & defend' vim & injur', 
Et per judicꝰ de brevi predict', quia dic' 
© q@& predict Comes in vita ſua conſtituit & 


'© ordinavit iplum Archiep'm ac quendam J. T. 


Repr & Iſſue. 


© fore Executores Teſti! ſui & poſtea obiit, 
* poſt cujus mortem, Idem J. diverſa bona & 
catalla que fuer' predict Comitis tempore 
mortis fue ut Executor Teſti” ipſius Comitis 

adminiſtravit videlt' apud H. in Com' K. qui 
© quidem J. apud H. predict' adhuc ſuperſtes 
© & in plena vita exiſtit, Et hoc paratus eſt 
* verificare, Unde ex quo predic? J. non 
© notat* in brevi predict' Idem Archiep'us pet 
© judic' de Brevi illo, &c. 

Et predit H. dic' qq” breve ſuum pre- 
© dia” ro'ne preallegat' caſſari non debet, 
© quia dic? qd' predict' J. poſt mortem predict 
Comitis aliqua bona ſeu catalla que fuer 
* ejuidem Comitis tempore mortis ſue ut Exe. 
cutor' Teſt! ipſius Comitis nunquam admi- 
* niſtravit, Et hoc per ꝗqd' inquiratꝰ per Priam', 
* &c. Vide Hanſ. Em. 102. and wide Raſt. 
* Ext. 63. N 


Aliter de Brevi Et Repl, Qd Teſtator non 
conſtituit al Exec. 


* Er dic qd predict A. B. in vita ſua 

; apud L. in Com? predict condidit 
© teſtum & ult' voluntar' ſua in ſcriptis & con- 
« ſtituit & ordinavit in eiſdem ipſum C. & 
© quendam E. F. Executores ejuſdem Telti', 
© Er poſtea idem A. B. Teſtator ibm” obiit, 
* Poſt cujus mortem idem E. ut Executor 
* Teſti ipſius A. ibm' Adminiſtravit hy 
| na 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 395 


- © bona & catalla que fuer? ejuſdem A. tee mor- 
tis ſue, Qui quidem E. adhuc ſuperſtes & in 
* plena vita exiſtit videlt' apud L. predict', 
Et hoc, (&c.) Unde ex quo predict E. non 
noiat' in brevi predict idem C. pet' judic 
de brevi illo, Et ꝗd' breve ill caſſet', &c. 
Et predict' A. dic' ꝗd' breve ſuum pre- Repr. 
dict ro'ne preallegat' caſſari non debet, 
* quia dic* qd” predict Teſtator non gonſtituĩt 
predict' E. Executor Teſt? predi&* prout 
* predict? C. ſuperius allegavit, Et hoc pet? 
* qd inquirar' per Priam', Et predict C. ſilit', 
| * &c. Vide 1 Browns En. 4. Placit Gen. 
| * 11, 12. 2 Mod. Intr. 18. & 3 Inſtr. Cher. laſt 
* pub. 48, 49. 
* Simile placitum ; Et rep!l', Qd' Teſtator 
* fee Def ſolum Exec. Placi” Gen. 11. 


Et predict E. & M. per W. R. At- Alter Exec” 
torn' ſuum ven' & defend* vim & injur* qo', non noiat in 
& c. Et pet? judicium de brevi & narr* pre- Brevi. 

i dict' quia dic qd' N. E. 21 Die Oct Anno 
„ © Domini 1691. apud C predict Teſtum' & 
. ult' voluntat' ſuam in ſcriptis condidit, Et 
© per eandem conſtituit & ordinavit quendam 
W. G. Executorem Teſti & ult' voluntat' pre- 
* dit? ſimulcum prefar M. Et poſtea ſcilt' 
26 die Nov Anno Domino 1691. ſupradict 
apud C. obiit qui quidem W. poſt mortem 
predict' N. & ante impetrac' brevis original 
ia ipſius M. in hac parte ſcilt 20 die Apr An- 
no Domini 1692. apud C. predict admini- 
n- I ſtravit ſimulcum prefat' M. diverſa bona & 
8 * catalla que fuer predict N. tee mortis ſue 
„ Qq'q; pred? W. tee? impetration' brevis pre- 
t, dict' fuit & adhuc exiſtit ſuperſtes & in plena 
vita videlt' apud C. predict, Et hoc iidem 
E. & M. parat' ſunt verificare, Unde pro 
_- f £0 


296 | Bar in Debt per 
eo qd predict W. non noiat' in brevi & 
©. narr* predict, predict E & M. pet' judic' de 
©* Brevi & Nart' il', Et qd' Breve & Narr ill 
caſſentur, &c. Tho. Fenner. Vide Clift. 
Entr. 15. nu. 36, 37. 


D Teftator fec Def & al Exec non noiat in 
brevi, Et rept, Od Exec non noiat obitt ante 
Orig pros; ut ſequitur. 


Bar. . TI pet' judic? de breve predict quia 
7 dic'qq' pred* W. G. in vita ſua languen' 
* 1n extremis apud I. predict' in Paroch' & 
Ay Exec' non Warda predict' condidit Teſtum' & ult' vo. 
noist in * Juntat' ſua in ſcriptis & predict J. B. J D. 
Brevi. & J. C. & quendam J. S. Executores Teſti” 
predict conſtituit & ordinavic poſteaq; ibm 
* obiic poſt cujus mortem ptedict' J. J. J. & J. 
LTeſtum' ill in debita juris forma probaver 
* & onus execution Teſti' il} ſuper ſe ſuſce- 
© per & divers bona & catalla que fuer* pre- 
* dit? W. tee? mortis ſue poſt mortem ipſius 
W. ut Execucor' Teſti” predict' cum prefat' 
* J. S. nunc ſuperſtit' & in plena vita exiſten' 
* ſcilt apud L. pred' in Paroch' & Wardapre- 
© di adminiſtravei', Et hoc paratꝰ eſt verifi- 
care; Unde ex quo predict J. S. in brevi 
* predict? non no'iat'. Idem H. pet” Judic' de 
© brev1 illo, &c. 


Rep!' q& - oe predict J. & J dic' qa breve ſuum 
obiir ante predict' ro'ne preallegat' caſſati non debet, 
Orig”. © Quia dic? ꝗd' predict J. S. ante diem im. 
| © petrac? brevis orig? ipſorum J. J. & J. ſcilt 
primo die Auguſti Anno, &c. apud L. in 
© Paroch' & Ward' predict obiit, Abſq; hoc 
gqd' predict J. S. adhuc ſuperſtes & in plena 
< vita exiltic prout predict H. ſuperius allega. 
02 vit, 


— Ty. oy Aa 


>. Ge GL, oy, Py Re y é M ̃ Sue &f & 6a oa * a 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 


vit, Et hoc parat' ſunt verificare. Unde 
* per” judic' & qꝗd' breve ſuum predict bo- 
num ad judicetur unacum dampnis ſuis 
© occo'ne detencon* debiti ill' ſibi adjudicari, 
* &c. Iſſue thereupon, q& J. S. fuit ſuperſtes, 
c. Et Judic' pro Quer. Vide Bro. Red. 
0 199. | 


Executor de injuria ſua, placitat qa Teſta- 
tor conſtituit Executores, & c. per AFion' 
non, Cc. 


15 L predict” W. per W. G. Attorn' Bar. 

L, ſuum ven' & defend* vim & injur” 
go, &c. Et dic! q& predict P. Action non, 
Quia dic' qd' predict T. in vita ſua ſcilt 
„ (tali Die & Anno) apud L. predi&' condi- 
© dit teſtum' & ult' voluntat' ſua in ſcriptis & 
per idem Teſtum ſuum quoſdam G. D. W. H. 
+ & T. J. Executores ejuſdem Teſti? ſai conſti- 
mit & ordinavit & poſtea ibm? obiit, Ac pre- 
„ dich G. D. W. H. & T. J. poſt mortem pre- 
dict T. H. ſcilt' (tali Die & Anno) apud L. 


predict: Teſtum & ult' voluntat' ipſius T. H. 

l. debita ; Juris forma 2 & onus execu- 

i tion inde ſuper ſe ſulceper* & diverſa bona & 

de © catalla que fuer* predict' T. tee? mortis ſue 
© poſtea ibm' adminiſtraver, Ac iidem G. D. 
W. H. & T. J. adhuc ſuperſtites & in plena 

m vita exiſtunt videlt apud L. predict', Et 

„ © hoc patat' eſt verificare, Unde pet' judicꝰ fi 

. predict P. actionem ſuam predi&? vers 

ir eum habere debeat, &c. Vide Clift. Ext. 

ny 348, &c. 

oc 

na 

pa- Fer 


38 har in Debt per 


For that another Adminiſtrator not named 
adminiſtred ſimulcum Def”. 


Bar. Pr per judic' de Billa predict quia dic 
, ꝗd' poſt mortem predict' E. M. ſcilt 
tali Die & Anno apud L. (& c) Admini- 
© {tra'co omn', (&c.) que fuer' predict E. M. 
© tee? mortis ſue adminiſtrand' prefat' D. & 
© cuidam J. M. relict' predict E. M. per, 
© (&c.) co'miſſa ſuit, Que quidem J. adhuc in 
© plena vita exiſtit videltꝰ apud L. predi& in 
Com' predict, Unde ex quo predict' J. M. 
© non noiat' in Billa predict' Idem Def pet” 
* judic* de Billa predict, Et ꝗd' Billa ill caſſet', 
© &c. Vide Thomp. Ent. fol. 1. Et vide Pla- 
© citat” Gen. 337. & 3 Inſt. Cler. laſt pub. 49. 
© 2 Med, Intr. 18. 


Bar gd Def“ ff Quando, &c. Et dic qꝗd' predict 
fuit Exec G. W. in vita ſua Languens in extremis 
Noir & compos mentis apud L. predict in Paroch' 
; & Ward' predia* condidit teſtum* & ult 
voluntat' ſua in ſcriptis, Et per idem Teſtum' 
* conſtirujt prefat' R. & quandam FE. Filiam 
predict G. Executor Teſti' ſui predict que 
© quidem F. adhuc eſt ſuperſtes & in plena vita 
© & diverſa bona & catalla que fuet predict G. 
tee mortis ſve ut Executor Teſt! predict G. 
predict' adminiſtravit videlt apud L. predict 
in Paroch' & Ward' ptedict', Et hoc, &c. 
« Undeex quo eadem F. non noiat' in Billa 
c predict idem R. pet' judic' de Billa u', &c. 
c Vide Rob. Ent. 229. | 


Df" 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 


Def dic qd eſt Adm cum Teſto annex, 


Et non Executor. 


. © CT predict' J. per Attorn' ſuum ven & Bar. 
: defend' vim & injur', Et pet judic 
© de brevi predict' quia dic'ꝰ qq predict“ J. B. 
© cujus Teſti' Executor? predict' J. modo Def? 
eſſe ſuperius ſupponitꝰ in vita ſua 25 die Dec 
Anno Regni dicti Domini Regis nunc 8. ſu- 
© pradi&t apud L. predi&? in Paroch & Ward 
predict condidit Teſtum' & ult' voluntat 
l — in ſcriptis, Et per eandem ult' volun- 
© tat” ſuam quandam H. tunc Ux' ejus Execu- 
* tricem unicam Teſti ſui predict' - conſtitait 
* & ordinavit ac poſtea ibm' obiit. Poſt cujus 
© mortem predic H. execution Teſti” ipſius 
J. predi& ſuper ſe non ſuſcepĩt ſed aliquam 
* Executionem Teſti” ill ſuper ſe ſuſcipere o'io 
©-recuſavit, ac execution” inde poſtea (cilt* pt 
mo die Sept” Anno Regni dicti Domini Regis 
nunc 9. apud L. predict in Paroch & Ward” 
predict penitus & debita juris forma renun- 
ciavit, Per quod poſtea & antequam idem J. 
modo Dei aliqua bona ſeu catalla que fuer” 
© predict” J. Teſtatoris tee“ ſuo adminiſtraſſet 
© ſcilt' 10 die Sept' Anno 9. ſupradict' Adm 
© bonorum & catallorum que fuer predict ]. 
LTeſtatoris tee mortis ſue cum Teſto* ipſius 
; J. annex” per (Cui commiſſio Admini- 
tion' ill” de jure pertinuit) apud L. predi& in 
© Paroch* & Ward' predi& eidem J. modo 
© Def* in debita Legis forma commiſſa fuit. 
In quo caſu idem J. modo Def? Admini- 
&:{trator bonorum & catallorum que fuer? pre- 
i dict' J. Teſtatoris cum Teſto” ipſius J. annex 
in brevi predict no'iari debuit, Et hoc pa- 
4 tf \ 7 rat 


o 
£ 
6 
a 


468 


Simile & 


Traverſe.” © 


Simile. 


Bat. 


Bar in Debt per 


© rat” eſt verificare, Unde ex quo ipſe in coder 


© brevi non ita no'iat eſt, pet' judic' de brevi 
© illo, Et qd' idem breve caſſet', &c. Vide 
© Clift's Ent. 16. See after. 


. Debt vers Exec' de S. placicum qd' 
S. obiit inteſtatꝰ & Adminiſtratio ſuit commils' 
© Def” Repl qꝗd' S. fec' Def Exec. Et Tra- 
* verſe qd” S. obiit inteſtat'. Placit. Gen. 2; 
* 3s 6. | E 


e Simile poſt Sequeſtration' fat? per Or- 
© dinar” de bonis Inteſtat'. Placit, Gen. 12. 
* Raſt. 324.6. 


Debt vers un come Ad; Bar, Bf fuit Exer 
ſimulcum al' qui Ad, Et traverſe, Qu 
obitt Inteſt”. | 


J. P predi&” T. S. per R. C. Att ſuum 
L. ven' & defend” vim & injurꝰ quando, 


E&c. Et dic qd? predict M. L. Actionꝰ non, 


go dic' qd' prediat* A. B. in Bille predict 
uperius noiat languens in extremis & com- 


C 
pos mentis exiſten' poſt conſection ſcript 
* Ob! predi&' ſcilt tali Die & Anno condidie 
* teſtum' & ult' voluntat' ſua in ſcriptis, Et per 
* eadem conſtituit & ordinavit-iplum T. S. & 
© quendam H. B. gen jam defunct Executores 
LJeſti' ſui. predict', Qui quidem H. B. ſimul- 
cum predict T. S. adminiſtravit diverſa 
* bona & catalla que fuer” predict J. B. tee 
© mortis ſue videlt' apudꝰ L. pred' in Paroch & 
* Warda predict Abſq; hoc qd' predict ]. 
© obiic inteftat' prout predict M- per Billam 
© ſuam predict — ſuppon', Et hoc, &c. 
Unde, &c. Vide Thompſ. 140. 1d 0 
7 f. An 


{ 

| 

Y 

— 

{ 

4 

< 

4 
4 
C 
4 
0 
4 
o 

L 
0 
c 
4 


wo 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 40 


+ An Adminiſtrator, aſter Oyer of the That the | 
Writ, pleads that the Writ bears Teſte be- Writis reſted 


fore the Letters of Adminiitration, and adjudg- 2 


ed a good Plea upon Demurrer. Vide tion. 
1 Lat. 7, 8, 9. And ſee it in Dact. De- 
mur. 246. 


Et predict T. A. & M. per J. H. At. d Def' eſt 
© torn' ſuum ven & defend* vim & injur' Adm & non 
* quando, &c. Et pet' judic Bille prefat' R. D. Exec 
modo versꝰ eos exhibitꝰ quia dicꝰ qd' predict 
W. C. poſt confection Bille ob! predict 
© ſcilt” 20 die Marcii Anno Domini 1658. apud 
F. predict in Com' predict' obiic inteſtat 
5 poli cujus mortem Adm'co omnium & ſingulo- 
© rum bonorum & catallorum jurium & cre- 
© dirorum que fuer prefat' W. C. tee mortis 
* ſue per R. nuper Dominum Protector” 

* Reipub' Ang! Scotie & Hibernie & Domina- 


tion & Territor' adinde ſpectan 20 die 


* Aprilis Anno Domini 1659. apud F. pre- 
dict' eidem M. debito modo commils? fuit, 
* In quo caſu eadem M. ut Adminiſtratric 
* omnium & ſinglorum bonorum& catallorum 
* jurium & creditorum preſat' W. C. pre- 
P 
dict' per Billam prefat' R. D. predict ſe- 
* cundum Legem Terre impli'tari' debuit, Et 
* hoc parat' ſunt verificare, Unde ex quo pre- 
dict M. Executrix Teſti” prefat' W. C. & non 
Adminiſtratrix bonorum & catallorum pre- 


* di in Billa prefat' R. D. predi&' vers eos 


© modo exhibit” ſuperius nominar' exiſtit, Idem 
T. & M. per judic' de eadem Billa, &c. 


© Vide Hanſ. Ent, 66. 


Action againſt an Executor; he pleads, m=_ bear 
chat he is Adminiſtcator by Letters granted by ce. 


D d * the 


- f a—_— » 

- cat "w_—_ - 2 
2 ” 

2 n I - <= b 


= 
Ou Ci er ͤ ͤ mon. xo 


402 Bar in Debt per 
f the Dean, e. of Cant urbury, ec. but ill | up- 


on Demurrer, becauſe it was not ſaid that the 
Inteſtate had bone notabilia, 1 Lut. 9. 


Bar q& Ad- * Etpred' H. B. per B. A. Att ſuum ven! & 
mini'co fuit © pet judic' de billa predict” quia dic' qd” pre- 
commiſi a dict T. B. in Billa predict ſuperius no'iat 
22 apud paroch* ſci' M. predict in Com' pre- 
© dia? obiit inteſtat* poſt cujus mortem ſcilt' 
© primo die Maii Anno, &c. 18. Adm'co 
© omnium & ſinglorum bonorum jur' & credit” 
© que fuer predict' T. tee mortis fue per G. 
_ © providencia divina Archiep'um Cant” totius 
© Ang! Primat' & Metropolitan” apud paroch' 
© ſc! M. Weſtm' predict in Com? predict 
© cuidam A. N. debito modo com miſſa fuit 
© prout per L'ras Adminiſtrator? predict' hic 
© in Cur? prolat' apparet, Virtute cujus pre- 
A * di&' A. diverſa bona & catalla que fuer* pre- 
© Et Traverſe dict T. B. ut Adm' ejuſdem T. poſtea ibm 
| que ir qq* © adminiſtravit, Abſq; hoc qqd* prediQ* H. B. 
Exec”. © eſt Executrix Teſti predict T. B. ſeu un- 
quam adminiſtravit aliqua bona ſeu catalla 
predict T. ut Executrix Teſti” predict T. 
modo & forma prout predict' W W. per 
© Billam ſuam predi& ſuperius ſuppon', Et 
© hoc parat' eſt verificare, Unde pet' judic? de 
Billa predict', Et qd” Bil? ill” caſſetur, &c. 
* Vide Tbompſ. Ent. 221. Vide poſtea. 


3 
S Def placitat, Bad" Inteſtat habuit bona 


| notabilia, Et ideo Lre Adm'con Def | & 
[ commiſs revocat' fuer. 4 
d 0 
Bir. A © T predict' S. per W. P. Attorn? ſuum * 
£ 


ven & defend” vim & injur” quando, 
© &c, Et dic ꝗd' predict' T. Action' non, 
« quia 


Executors & Adminiſtrators 433 
* quia dic* qd” predict R. qui obiit inteſtat 
© habuic bond notabilia in divers Dioces infra 
l TIE Cant ſcilt' in Dioces L. & Dioces 
N. per quod Adminiftraco' omnium bono. I 

rum jur & credit que fuer predict R. tee? | | 
mortis ſue, Et que eidem S. per J. P. Sn. | 
Doctorem per totum Archidiaconar S. ac vill 
de Cur' ſci. E. Commiſſional' & Official? 
legitime conſtitut” in Loco Ordinarii ſecundo 
Ne Now Anno Regni Regis Fas. 2. 3. apud 
B. ſci E. predict commiſſa ſuit penitus vacua 
eſt & nullius effectus in Lege reman', Et pre- i 
dict” S. ulterius dic* qd” breve Adminiftration* | 
ſic ut prefert eidem'S. per piedict J. P. com- 

miſs' ad Cur Prerogativam Reverendiſſimi Revocation', 

in Chriſto Pris ace Domini W. divina pro- 

videnc' Archiepi Cant cotius Angf Primat 

& Metropolicu?” tent” coram R. R. Mil 9 
Legum Doctore Cur* Prerogativ' Cantuar LL 
Magiſtro Cuſtod' & Commiſſar* legitime 1 
conſtitut ſeptimo die, Menſis Febr inſtan, A 

er AQ 1% Decretꝰ predict Cur' revocatꝰ 
uer?, Ad omnem Juris effem* prout per Act 
ſive Decret predict Cur' Prerogative in A 
eadem remanen' plenius _ & apparet, b 
Et hoc parat eſt verificare, Unde pet judic o 
ſi predict T. Action Ck predic” vers' ip- 4 
ſum S. ut Adminiſtrator” habere feu manu- : 
tenere debeat, &c. Vide 13 Ent. 350. 
* Vide poſtea. 


— 1 © Debt vers Exec B. ſir Bilp, Barr? qd Qd S. tec” 
„5. ſuit tent conjunctim cum B. 3 in fur — 

* eadem Billa, Et obiit inteſtar' poſt cujus mor: g * 
tem Admin co bon S. fuit commils* quer', 


m Et Demur' We 3 Brownl, 142. 


Aa 1a, «. „ © 


© ra At 
. % „ A. „ „ A 2, c nA KA GM K „ „ 


— 


— 


3 


—— CO 


404, ä har in Debt per 


F. aliter qd fuit Ade non Bxect ro'ne 


bonorum notabiÞ, Gs. 


Ber per bona * 44 non, & c. quia dic' qd predict 
in divers ©. T. die, &c. Anno, &c. apud, &c. 
Dioces', &c. © 'qbiit inteſtat' hens' dum vixit & tee mortis 
© fue diverſa bona & catalla notabilia jut a & 
© credit” in divers' Dioces' & peculiar* Juril- 
© dicton', R'one cujus Adminiſtraco' omnium, 
. © &c, que fuer” predict T. tee mortis ſue reve- 
* rendo in Chriſto Patti J. providencia Divina 
g Cant' Archiepo' totius Angl' Primat' & Me- 
© tropolitan' ro'ne Prerogative ſue pertinebat, 
Qui quidem reverendus Pater poſtea & ſcilt 
© die, &c. Anno, &c. Adminiſtration' om- 
© nium, &c. que fuer* predict' T. tee mortis 
* ſue prefat' Def” apud, &c. in Com' pre- 
* dic commiſit, Et hoc, &c. Unde, &c. 
© [Er  pitatur in Bill'] unde ex quo idem 
* Def” Executor predia* T. in Billa illa no'iat' 
pet judic' de Billa illa, &c. Vide Thomy/. 


* 433, 434 


In Debt agaivſt an Adminiſtrator, he pleads 

- that he ir Adminiſtrator Daran' minori 
etat', & demur inde, Secundum, 1 Lut. 
2  o 


By . L predi& Anna per C. W. Att' ſuum 
8 ; ven', Et per” judic' de Brevi pre- 

-» © di&', Quia dic' Q& predict' R. in narr' pre- 

- © dit menconat' 31 die Julii Anno Regni 
Domini Regis nunc primo apud P. predict 

condidit teſtum' & ult' voluntat' ſua in ſcriptis 


KE ejuſdem conſtituit & ordinavit R. P. filium 
| prefat 


a a _ ww Rr” RR ou” 7 ET 


La) 


b LEI ̃ M , 2 


r 


10 
1i 
. 


m 
re- 
re- 
ni 
Po 
Its 


um 
fat 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 408 


prefat R. Executorem & poſtea ſciltꝰ primo die 
* O; Anno primo ſupradicto apud P. pred obiir, 
Poſt cujus quidem R. P. pris, mortem & ante 
© ipſa A. adminiſtravit aliqua bona ſeu catalla 
* que fuer? predict R. P. pris' tee mortis ſue 
© {cilt” tertio die Oct' Anno Regis dicti Do- Admin co 
© mini Regis nunc piimo apud P. predictꝰ Commis 
* Adminiſtraco' omnium & ſinglorum bono- Def '. 
* rum & catallorum Jur* & Credit' que fuer” 
predict R. P. tee? mortis ſue per G. provi- 
* denc? divina Cantrar' Archiep'um totius 
* Ang! Primat' & Metropolitan' debito modo 
* commils' fuic eidem A. cum Teſto? predict 
R. annex' & duran' minori etar' predia? R. 
* filii predi&” R. patris & ad ejus uſum & uti- 
* litaf Qui quidem R. P. filius adhuc infra etat' 
17 Annorum & in plena vita exiſtit videltꝰ 
apud P. predict Unde ex quo predict' 
A. & F. non impetraver' breve ſuum predict 
vers' iplam A. ut Adminiſtratric* bonorum & 
catallorum que fuer” R. P. tee mortis ſue 
cum Teſto* predict R. annex' duran' minori 
etat' predict” R. filii pet? judic* de Brevi illo, 
Et qd' Breve ill caſſet', &c. 
* Quer* morat' in Lege & pro cauſis, vi - Demut eum 
* delt, qd' predict' A. male concluſit & nan Cauſis. 
verificavit placitum ſuum predict', Qd'q; 
idem placitum eſt in ſe totalit' incertꝰ & caret 
forma. Def jung' in morac': But Fudg- 
ment was given, Qd' Det” reſpond' ouſter, 55 
reaſon of the Default of an Averment of ber garment 
Plea, by Et hoc parat' eſt verificare, &c. che  _ 
which is the Cauſe of the Demurrer, 1 Lut. 21. wanting in 
And ſee it in Dot? Demur'. 248. the Ples. 


«922 a 2 „ 


Dd 3 Que 


| 
' 


496 


* 


Bar in Debt per 


| One pleads in Abatement, the others by Al 
Actio depending. | 


Several Bars . 22 againſt Executors on a Bond by 
by Executor. the Teſtator; one pleads in Abatement, 
another Action brought againſt him and his 
Wife as Heirs to the Teſtator, (in eadem Cur”) 
which Suit is yet depending. Plaintiff demurs. 
Lev. Ent. 54. Is 7 by 


- 


Debt for Remt againſt an Executor of ]. 
2M upon a Leaſe Parol. X 
Abatement, For that J. died Inteftate, and Adm 


niſtration committed to the Defendant, 


Repl', That ſhe adminiſtred at  Executrix b. 
fore the Adminiſtration, and that in ber own 


| $ Wi rong. | 


| Abatement. . FE! predict Thomaſina per T. Attorn 
a 98 ſuum ven? & dic! ꝗd' predictꝰ J. V 
apud Civit E. predict' obiit inteſtat' poſ 
cujus mortem E. L. Clericus ſacre Theoloy 
© Profeſlor” Archidiac' Exon' legitime conf | 
© ſtituit apud Civit? E. predi& per L'ras fu : 
© Adminiſtrator” commiſit eidem T. Admin], 
ſtrationem omnium bonorum & catallorun} +; 

© que fuer' predict J. tempore mortis ſue Q 

* quidm'” E. adtunc, habuit plenam authorita 

ad adminiſtration” ill' in ea parte committen 

in quo Caſu predict M. ipſam Tho' Adm 

c niſtratricem bonorum & catallorum que fue 

| * predict' J. & non Executricem Teſti” pre 

2 * zpſius J. in brevis ſuo predictꝰ noiare? debui 

; . BEE b Hz, EAT n/a 


— 


1 K 
... Ee EE EEC — 


E I Erie EG PIETY > IA. * 
* * 1 r e = 


1 


Executors & Adminiſtrators 


Et hoc parat eſt verificare Unde pet Judic 
© de brevi illo, Et qd' breve illud caſſet'. 


497 


Et predict M. dic” qd* breve ſuum pre- Rep!. 


© dit* ro'ne preallegat caſſari non debet, 
* Quia dic' q poſt mortem prefat? J. & ante 
© Commiſſion? Adminiſtration' predict eidem 
TJ. in forma predict' ſcilt' 18 die Sept' Anno 
© Regni Domini Regis & Domine Regine 
nunc primo piefat? T. diverſa bona & catalla 
© que fuer” prefat' J. tee mortis ſue ut Execu- 
© trix teſt? ipſius J. adminiſtravit videlt' apud 
* paroch' ſc! E. predict', Et hoc parat' eſt 
© verificare, Unde pet? judic' & debitum ſuum 
© predi&' unacum dampnis ſuis occoꝰne deten - 
tion debiti ill ſibi adjudicari, &c. 


Def' morat' in Lege, Et quer' jung' in 
F morat', Vide 2 Ven. 178, &c. | 


Upon the Argumen of this Demurrer, Judg- 
ment was given for the Plaintiff; for the 
Defendant ſets not- forth the Day when Ad- 
miniſtration was committed, ſo it might be 
after the Writ brought: And beſides, if ſhe 
diſpoſed of the Goods as Executrix of her own 
Wrong, the taking of Adminiſtration aſter- 
wards, tho' before the Writ brought, will not 
hinder the Plaintiff from charging her as Execu- 


trix of her own. Wrong. And the Difference 


is taken in the Caſe of Milliamſon and Norwich, 
Styl. Rep. 337. 1 Rol. 923. where an Action 
of Debt was brought upon a Contract againſt 
the Defendant as Executor of his own Wrong 
the Defendant pleads the Party was indebted 
unto him upon Bond, and died inteſtate, and 
that he afterwards took out Letters of Admini- 
{tration to him, (which appeared to be aſter the 


D d Writ 


Demur”. 


Hob. 49. Cr: 
Car. 89. P. 
Com. 282. 8, 


7% 
J 
} e. 
1 J 
1 
1 
1 
75 
** 
8 
| 
* 
2 
: 


408 Bar in Debt per 


8 
2 
3 
4 
N 
| 


Writ brought) and pleads a Retainer for his 
That an Exe- own Debt, and the Plaintiff demurr'd ; and 


cutor of his judgment was given for the Defendant, That 


own Wrong {ch Adminiſtrator might retain for his own 
car not retain, 


che A Imini. Debt, tho he had been before Executor of 
ſtrator might. his own Wrong 3 but ſuch taking of Admini- 
ſtration ſhould not abate the Plaintiff's Writ. 


Keb. 127. 5 Co. Couter's Caſe: An Executor 
of his own Wrong cannot retain. 


Bars, &c. per Executors and Adminiſtre- 


tors, mentioned in the Fourth Part of 
_ Inſtructor Clericalis, &c. 


Conditions . . perform'd pleaded by an 

e. Executor. 4 Inſtr. Cler. 89. 

Ren? by Ad- J. Aliter, Rep!” by an Adminiſtrator, as to 

8 the remaining Covenants, Cc. in a Defea. 
zance upon a Recognizance. Id. ibid. 


Covenants J. Debt againſt an Adminiſtrator upon a 
perform by Bond for Performance of Covenents, aſter 


Adminiſtra- Recital of the Indendure, where the Plaintiff 
tor. was to have 200 Furſe Faggots, or Wood Fag- 


gots, during the Term; Defendant pleads 
Covenants perform'd generally. 


Rep? qi non. Repl, That he had not of the Inteſtate in his 
Lite, or of the Defendant, afterwards 200 
Furſe Faggots yearly during the ſaid Term; 
but that 800 Furſe Faggots, or 800 Wood Fag- 


gots, were due, Cc. Defendant demuts, cum 
Notis, Idem 122. 


Def* Exe . Defendant confeſſes, Thar the Plaintiff 
confeſs and did come into the Service of the Teſtator, and 
avoid. therein continued till ſuch a Time, when the 

Teſtator did plentitully provide for him ; and 


that ſuch a Day the Plaintiff voluntarily left 
the Service of the Teſtator, and traverſes," that 


he 


_ © &c. Ideo ver}, &c. 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 409 


he ſerved him the whole Time in the Declara- 
tion. Plaintiff demurs, cum Noris. Id. 217, &c. 

The Deſendant ſays that the Teſtator, Quoad Ap. 
Poſt Confect ionem ſcripti obiit, and that the Ap- prentic' : 
prentice, ad nullum tempus poſt confettiow ſcripts eſtator', 
abſentaſſct, Et qd' non imbexillavit. Id. 225. 

C. Adminiſtrator in B. R. pleads in Bar, Aqwiniftra- 
a judgment upon a Verdict at the Nif prius at tor pleads 2 
Weſtminſter, Rep! per nul tiel Record', Id. 23 1. Judgment. 

Debt againſt an Adminiſtratrix upon a Re- Adminiftra- 


covery in the Com. Pleas againſt her Inteſtate. trix confeſſes, 
Defendant conſeſſes the Judgment and Affir- but avoids by 


mance of it in Error; and pleads, that the * S7 Fig 
Plaintiff brought a Scire Facies upon the ſaid 7 * — 
Judgment againſt the now Defendant in the 
King . Bench: And the Plaintiff demurs. 14. 232. 

1 Executor pleaded a Concord for a Bond Executor | 
to be given by him in Satisfaction of the Bond plead Securi- 
of the Teſtator, and Security given according. ty given. 
ly. Et Quer morat. 379. 

J. Per Adm' qd le Inteſtate ſolvit ad diem, Qd' Inteſtate 
* Repl' qq' non & Iſſue. 416. ſolvit, &c. 

Et modo, &c. AdRion' non, quia dic' qd' Ne unques 
© ipſe idem C. nunquam fuit Executor' Teſti' Exec. * 
© pred I. S. nuper defunct nec aliqua bona ſive 
© catalla ipſius j. ut Executor Teſti' ejuſdem 
: nunquam adminiſtravit, Et hoc, &c. Unde, 

&c. 

* Precludi non, quia dic' qd” predict' C. | 
* diverſa bona & catalla que fuer dia? J. S. uin 
* tee* mortis ſue poſt mortem ipſius J. ut Exe- 
© curor” Teſti” ejuidem J. videlt' apud R. in 
Com predict” adminiſtravit, Et hac per qd*- 
inquirat' per Priam', Et predict' C. ſilit', 


* Vide 1 Inſtr. Cler. laſt pub. 221, 222. 
Placir. Gen. 335. Bro. Vad, 228. Clerk's Aſs 
74. Thompſ, 427. Winch's Ent, 341, &c. Co. 
Ent. 144. * Acgion' 


c 
o 
4 


* 

. 

6 

br 

=__ 
1 

of 

8 

by 


J. tee? mortis ſue eidem C. per pron Ar- 
a fuit, Et 


Several Bags, 


© hoe, &c. Unde, &c. | 

© Precludi non, quia dic qdꝰ Adminiſtraco? 
© omnium & ſinglorum bonorum & catallorum 
F que fuer” dict' J. S. tee? mortis ſue per pre- 


dict Archiep'm Cant apud L. prefar C. 


eommiſſa fuit prout ipſe per Narr' ſuam pre- 
© dict ſuperius ſuppon', Et hoc pet qd inqui- 


© rat' per Priam', Et predict C. ſilit. Ideo, 


© &c. 
© Vide 1 Inf.Cler. 221, &c. 337. Raft. 149. 
© Aſt. Ent. 286. 1 Mod, Intr. 186. Placit: 


© Gen, 337. 


© Ne Unques Exec' per Un', plene Admi- 
© niſtravit per alium. Raft. 151. Af, 284. 
© Thompf. 420. | 

© Ne Unques Exec' per Un', Non eſt 


factum per alium. Raſt. 322. 


Bar, 24 R. Teſtator Def adminiitra- 

vit tantum circa Funeralia. _Repl', 2d 
Adm” ut Exec ſolvend' deba', Rejo, d 
non ſolvit deba. 5 | 


; £* R R. A. ſen? per W. M. Att 
** 


ſuum ven & defend' vim & injur' 
© quando, Et dic' qd' predict T. Action' non, 
© Quia dic' ꝗd' predict” J. apud L. obiit poſt 
© cujus mortem predict' R. diverſa bona & 
© catalla ac denariorum ſummas predict ]. 
© circa Funeralia ipſius J. adminiſtravit, Abſqʒ 
© hoc qd' predi& R. aliqua bona ſeu catalla 
* que fuer? predict' J. tee“ mortis ſue ut Exec 


* Tell?” ipſius I. poſt mortem ejuſdem 1. 10 
* ſeu 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 
* ſeu aliquo alio modo unquam adminiſtravit, 
Et hoc, &c. Unde, &c. 4 c 


Et predict T. dic' qd' ipſe precludi non, Repl' qd' 


4 


11 


+ quia dic” qd' predict R. in vita ſua diverſa ſolvit deba', 


© bona & catalla que ſuer predictꝰ J. tee mor- 
© tis ſue ut Executor Teſti? predict J. poſt 
mortem ejuſdem J. adminiſtravit ut folvend' 
deba' predict J. videle cuidam W. C. 40 8. 
© videlt' apud L. in dicto Com' S. Et hoc, &c. 
* Unde, &c. * | | 

Et predict R. ut prius dic qd' predict 
KR. non ſolvit prefat W. C. predict 40s. nec 
* aliquem denatr' inde prout predict T. ſupe- 
© rius allegavit, Et de hoc pon ſe ſuper Priam', 
Et predict' T. filit' ideo precept' eſt vic, &c. 
* Vide Raft. 322. b. And 1 Brown, 200. Placit. 
Gen. 353. 


Debt vers Executorem ſuper Obl, fimulcum 

4 Executore qui utlegat exiſtit. Bar, 
24 Ieſtator fecit iſtum Exec qui utlegat. 
Na'q; Def ut ſerviens Executori vendi- 
dit diverſa bona pro illo, Et computavit 
cum illo pro eiſdem, Et traverſe qd ad- 
zriniſtravit aliquo alio modo prout, Gc. 


'S 


Actio' non, Quia dic qd” H. (tali die 
& Anno) apud S. in Com' predict', con- 
didit Teſtum' & ult' voluntat' ſua & per 
© eadem conſtituit & ordinavit predict“ R. 
© fore Executorem Teſti” il poſteaq; obiit 
© poſt cujus quidem H. mortem predict R. 
ſuſcepit ſuper ſe onus Executionis Teſti” pre- 
© dict', Et predict“ J. ut Serviens Executor 
predict & per ejus precept* bona & catalla 
n que fuer” predict H. tee mortis fue, cuidam 


* 
— 

, 
+> } 


— 


T predic” Jo. qo', &c. Et dic' qd' 


Rejo? gd" .. 
non. 


Bar. 


F 


— Ee i als yg Be PEETEENS 


Cy er— 
* 8 . -# pre 


—— 
[ny — 4, OA 


1 


412 Baar in Debt per 
G. J. & al pro 20 |. leglis', &c. ante diem im. 
© 'petrac' brevis Original predict' R. ſcik 
© 20 die Aug Anno 40 ſupradicto apud 8. 
© predict” vendidit & denar' inde provenien 
predict Executori adtunc & ibm' ſolvit, Et 
« proinde cum eo plene computavit prout et 
bene licuit Abſq; hoc qd idem J. aliqua 
© bona ſeu catalla que fucr' predict H. tee 
mortis ſue aliter aut aliquo alio modo admi- 
niſtravit prout predict” R. ſuperius vers eum 
| narravit, Et hoc, &c. Unde, &c. 

Ouei' De- © Quer* morat' in Lege, Et Def' jung' in 
mur. © morat', Et judic' pro Def. Vide Bro. 
© Red. 196, &c. 


C 
« 
c 


Plene adminiſtravit. 


Bar in B. R. . WI modo, &c. Action' non, &c. Quia 
L dic qq ipſe tee“ exhibition bille 
© predic” plene adminiſtravit o'ia bona. & ca- 
© talla que fuer predi&' J. tee mortis fue in 
© 'manibus ſuis adminiſtrand', per quod pre- 
dict C. debitum ſuum predict' prefat? A. 
* folvere non potuit, Et hoc, &c. Unde, &c. 
Rep ꝗd' non. Et predict A. precludi non, quia dic' qd 
predict C habet & tee exhibition” bille pre. 
© dia? videlt (tali Die & Anno) apud, &c. 
* Habvit diverſa bona & catalla que fuer pre- 
dict J. tee mortis ſue in manibus ſuis admi- 
* niſtrand', Ad valenc?, (&c.) Unde eidem 
A. de debito predict' ſatisfacere potuit, vi- 
© delt apud S. in Com' predict', Et hoc petit 
© q& inquirat' per Priam', Et predict? C. ſilit'ꝰ, 
© &c. Ideo ven', &c. 
Aliter. f. Action non, quia dic? ꝗd' ipſe idem 
Bar. Deſ' tee? exhibitionis bille predict” plene ad. 
* miniſtravit o'nia bona & catalla que fuer” pre- 
dict T. tee mortis ſue in manibus ſuis admi- 
© niſtrand;, 


A „ a oQ «a © 


G & a , 


> 6% a a = © 


PLP, Io T7 = HY 


W7 


' 


Exccutors & Adminiſtrators. 


nĩſtrand', Et qd' ipſe non habet nec die ex- 
gibition' bille predict vel unquam poſtea ha- 
© buit aliqua bona ſeu catalla que fuer* predictꝰ 
T. tee mortis ſue in manibus ſuis admini- 
* ſtrand' unde debitum predi& ſeu aliquem 
* inde denar* preſat' Quer ſolvere potuit, Et 
* hoc, &c. Unde, &c. 

Precludi non, quia dic' qd' ipſe idem Def RepT!. 
habet & dicto tee exhibition* bille pre- 
* dit? ſcilt' tali die & Anno hahuit diverſa 
dona & catalla que fuer' predict“ T. tee 
© mortis ſue in manibus ſuis adminiſtrand” 
© ad Valenciam debiti predict', Unde eidem 
* Quer' de debito predict' ſatisfeciſſe potuit 
* videlt' apud O. in Com' C. Et hoc per 
* q& inquirat” per Priam', &c. Vide Thomp/. 
. 

7 Action non, quia dic' qq* idem J. plene Aliter in 
* adminiſtravit omnia bona & catalla que c. 8. 
© fuer” predict D. tee mortis fue, Qd'q; 
© ipſe nulla habet bona ſea catalla que fuer” 
© prefat D. tee' mortis ſue in manibus ſuis 
adminiſtrand' nec babuit die impetrac' 
* brevis Orig' ipſius R. nec unquam poſtea, 
© Et hoc, &c. Unde, &c. 

Precludi non, quia dic' qq* predict' J. die Rep!. 
* impetrac* brevis Original' ipſius R. ſcilt 
(tali Die & Anno) habuit diverſa bona & 
© catalla que ſuer' predict' D. tee' mortis 
ſue in manibus ſuis adminiſtrand' ad va- 
© lenc' Debiti predict' ſufficien? ad ſolvend' 
predict D. debicum ſuum predict' videlt 
apud C. in Com' predict, Et hoc pet' qd 
© inquirat” per Priam', &c. 


Plane 


313 


ds 


— n 
— > ONE IE. a F a = - 
— 


n 


'Bat in Debt per 
Plene Abs Ge. Vide 1 | Mod. 
Int. 185. Pl. Gen. 335. 2 Mod. fon 241. 


Bro. Vad. 229. Clerks Aſſiſt. 73. 166. 
Thomſ. 427. 1 Inſtr. Cle. 212, 345. 


J. 4 Ebt vers A. & B. exec. Bar, Qq' 


A. obiit poſt ult” cont”, & B. placi- 
. . plene Adm', 1 Brownl. 87. Bro. Red. 175. 
Debt ſur Bill”, Acquietanc' al part” & 


© plene Adm' - reſid', 1 Brownl. 44. Simile 


© Bro. Red. 174. Rep!. Non eſt factum, Et 

* ouſter qdꝰ habuir Aﬀets. 

L © Simile vers? Exec'. Bar, Qd' primer 
© Exec' ove Baron' plene adminiſtr', Co. 
* Ext. 151. | 

. © Simile ubi primus Exec' plene adm'. 
Dyer 174. 

E < Simile & Bar qd' Deſꝰ poſt mortem 

* primi Exec” plene adm'. Co. Eur. 151. 

d' Def primo habuit notic' ſecte tali 
© die, ante quem diem plene Adm'. Rep, 

* Od — die habuit Aſſers, 3 Brownl, 139, 
* Hern. 7 Aſt. 224. 1 1 N 164. 2 Bro. 100, 
© Thompſ: 184. | 

F. © Plene Adm' preter, Kc. Repl', Qd' 
8 * haber bona ultra. Raſt, Ent. 323. Aſt. 254, 

© 255, 256. Vide poſtea, 2 Brown, 77. 

. © Plene Adm'. Repl'. Qd' Wer tulit 

* prius Orig? ſuper quo Def? fuit waviat', & 
© Waviariz fuit reverſat', pro inſufficien re- 
© tort? de allocat', Et qd' die proſecut' prioris 
5 Orig Def habuit Aſſers. Aſt. 262. Thompſ. 

© x86. | 

f- © Plene Adm, Repl' per Orig vers'Def* 


© & fon Baron qui obiit, per quod Breve 


* abatavic, Et Quer recent” 43 Billam pro 
x * eod 


%. 


Exccutots & Adminiftrators. 415 
© eod debito vers Def” que hahuit bona die 
© Orig. Rejo', Qd' quer' non recenter exhi- 

c buit Billam. Vidians Ent. 204. 

/ © Placitum per Exec qd* Teſtator 'fuie 
© Utlaw in un' Appeal de Robberie, Et qq 
© plene adminiſtravit omnia bona ſua que Te- 
© ſtator accrevit puis Utlary. Repl', Qd' ha- 
© buit Aſſets. Thompſ. 188. 

f. Bar per Uut! poſt Judic' vers Inteſtat” 
© que minime reverſat' exiſtit', &c. Demurr? 
« inde. i. Ent. 338. 

. © Similis Bar, Et ulterius qd' plene adm” 
© preter talia bona que Domino Regi occaſione 
l Urlegar, forisfact” fuer. Bro. Red. 218. 

. © Unus Exec placitat' plene adm”, alter 
* renunciation' probation” teſti; &c. Clerks 
© Aſt. 133. 

' © Plene adm' preterquam, &c. Def Judgment de 
© prie Judgment & habet de Deniers confeſſe, Deniers con- 
© Et quoad reſid* qd Def die Orig habuit eg, Erquoad 
Aſſets ſufficien' ultra. Repl' & Iſſue. Clerk. 
© Aſp. 167. | 

ff. * Plene adm' preterquam 600 J. onera- Quer per 
* bill Judic' placitat', Quer* non dedic', Et pet Judgment 
© Judic' de reſid' bonorum que remanſerint *<fid' poſt, 
© poſt ſatisſaction deb'orum placitat in Bar, Et *< 
ei conceditur. Bro. Vad. 171. 

a Judic' de bonis in ſuturo placitat”. Cliff. 

. 

Debt againſt an Executor: Defendant Special plens 
pleads a ſpecial Plene adminiffravit, upon a Re. adm. 


| covery by Verdict upon a Marriage Agree- 


ment, made by the Teſtator to. convey and 
allure Lands, &c. 
fſ. © Special Adminiſtravit, Qd' Teſtator fuit Simile, Od 


* indebicar Domino Regi, Scaccario ſuo, Teſtatoc fuit 
© Bro, Vad 474. | indebit Do- 
x 8 mino Reg 


J As 


* 


* 1 


416 Bar in Debt per 
Several Bars. . As to 101. demanded for the Rent of 4 
Shop, the Adminiſtrator pleads Non dimiſit z 
and as to 55 J. Reſidue for Tythes, Plone ad. 
miniſtravit, Bro, Mer. 242. 
Plme adm ln Debt againſt an Adminiſtrator, in the Ex. 
pleaded to = chequer, Defendant pleads Plene adminiſtr” before 
Bill ia $:4 the Bill exhibited. Repi', That he proſecuted a 
proba Subpæna with Intent to exhibit the ſaid Bill, &c. 
And avers, That the Detendant had Aſſets at 
the Time of the Return of the ſaid Subpæna. 
Rejoinder, That the Plaintiff gave him no No- 
tice that the ſaid Writs were proſecuted with 
an Intent to declare for the ſaid Debt, 1 Lut. 
598, 600, and Iſſue taken upon the Notice. 


Sur Scire Fac', That he had fully admini- 


fired, and that he had not waſted the 
Goods, prout per Inquiſition”. 


oe eres . LI Þ Predict T. quarto die placiti ſo- 
_— 1 : E lempnit', exact” per E. fol Atcorn? 
© ſuum ven' & dic' qqd' predict M. execution 
© ſuam de debito & dampnis predict' de bonis 
& catallis predict' T. propr' levari, habere 
non debet quia proteſtando qa” ipſe idem T. 
plene adminiſtravit omnia bona & catalla que 
© tuer* predict J. tempore mortis ſue in mani- 
© bus ſuis adminiſtrand', Et ꝗqdꝰ predict T. non 
habet nec tempore proſecution” predict” Bre- 
© vis de Sciri facꝰ habuiſſet aliqua bona ſeu 


© catalla que fuer* predict J. teinpore mortis 


Pro placito © ſue in manibus ſuis adminiſtrand', Pro pla- 

non vendidir, © cico predict T. dic' quod ipſe idem T. non 

&c. © vendidit ſeu elongavit vel in uſum ſuum propr* | 
c 


convertit & diſpoſuit aliqua bona ſeu catalla 
© que fuer predict' J. tempore mortis ſue modo 
* & forma prout per inquiſitionꝰ predict ſupe- 
2 rius 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 417 


© rius ſupponitur, Et hoc parat' eſt verificare, 1 
© unde pet Judic* fi predit' M. Execution” fl 
© fuam de debito & dampnis ſuis predict' ſibi l 
« adjudicat' verſus predict T. de bonis & ca- [ 
* tallis predict T. propr* levari. habere de- | l 
© beat, &c. 7 
Et predict M. dic' quod ipſa per aliqua Rep!', Qa* 
per predi&” T. ſuperius placitando allegatꝰ ab vendidit ad 
© executione ſua de debito & dampnis pre- Valenc, &e. 
* dit verſus prefat' T. de bonis & catallis pre- 
© dit” T. propr' levari precludi non debet, 
* quia dic' qq predict T. vendidit elongavit 
© & ad uſum ſuum propr' convertit & diſpo- 
© ſuit diverſa bona & catalla que fuer' predict 
© J. tempore mortis ſue ad valenc' predict' 
© Centum & unius libr? treſdecim ſolid” & qua- 
* tuor denar' in Breve & inquiſitione predictꝰ 
© ſuperius ſpecꝰ modo & forma prout per In- 
© quiſition' predict' ſuperius invent” exiſtit vi- 
4 © delt apud G. predict' in Com? predict”, Et 
hoc per qd' inquiratur per Patriam, Et pre- 
* dit? T. ſimilit', &c. Vide 1 Saund. 306. 


Debt for the penal Sum upon a Bill. 


. Ebt upon a Bill penal of 18 . 45, 6d, Bar per plene 
il of D for Payment of 9. 25. 3d. Bar per adm, Iſſue 
Plene adminiſtravit. Iſſue thereupon, and Ver- & Verdict, 
dict for the Plaintiff ; but Judgment was after- 

wards arreſted, becauſe it was only alledged 

in the Declaration that the penal Sum was 

not paid, and not that the 9/, 2. 3 d. was 

not paid. 1 Lat. 612, Cc. 


Ee Plene 


418 


Bar ver plene 
* 


R p!' & pet? 


nis in fututo. 


Bar in Debt per 


Plene Adminiftravit placitat”, Et Def pet 
Judic de bonis, Ge. que in futuro deve- 


nireni adminiſtrand ; 


© TT predict M. T. & G. per J. P. Attorn' 
p E ſuum ven' & defend” vim & injur' quan- 
© do, &c. Et dicunt qd' | mga; W. actionem 
ſuam predi& inde verſus eos habere ſeu ma- 
© nutenerenon debet, quia dicunt qd' ipſi plene 
© Adminiſtraver” omnia bona & catalla que 
© fuer” predict M. Teſtatoris tempore mortis 
© ſue, Et qd' ipſi nulla habent bona ſeu catalla 
© que fuer” ejuſdem M. Teſtatoris tempore 
© mortis fue in manibus ſuis adminiſtrand” nec 
© habuerunt die impetrationis Brevis Original 
predict W. nec unquam poſtea, Et hoc pa- 
© rati ſunt verificare unde petunt Judic' ſi pre- 
© dit W. actionem ſuam predi&' verſus eos 
© habere debeat, &c. | 

© Erpredia” W. ex quo predict M. T. & G. 
per placitum ſuum predict' non dedic' quin 
ſeœriptum predict modo hic in Cur' prolat 
© ſit factum predict M. Teſtator' nec quin de. 
bitum predict' in eodem ſcript' ſpecificat 
© fit verum & juſtum debitum adhuc inſolut' 
© & minime ſatisfact' ſeu aliter exonerat'. Ac 
pro eo ꝗd' ipſe idem W. non poteſt dedicere 
& quin predict' M. T. & G. non habent nec 
© die impetrationis Brevis Original' ipſius W. 
© nec unquam poſtea hucuſque habuerunt aliqua 
© bona ſeu catalla que fuet' predict' M. Teſta- 
© toris tempore mortis ſue in manibus ſais ad. 
© miniſtrand” per' Judic? de debito ſuo predict 
© per ipſum ſuperius petit” de bonis & catallis 
© que fuer” predict Mi. Teſtatoris tempore 
© mortis ſue, Et que ad manus predict' M. T 


8 


c 


«ov n 1 waa” wer A + ke 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 419 q 


© & G. in futuro devenirent adminiſtrand' le. 
* vand”, Ideo cons eſt qq* predict W. recu- 
© perert uſus preſat M. T. & G. debitum ſuum 
* predi& de bonis & catallis que ſuer predict 
M. teſtatoris tempore mortis ſue, Et que ad 
© manus predict M. T. & G. in futuro deve- 
* nirent adminiſtrand' levand', Et iidem M. T. 


G. in Mia', &c. 2 Saund. 216, Clift Ent. 428. 
* Bro, Vad. 471. | 


Et predict' M. Executor T. & G. dicunt Bar af Sci 
© q& predict W. executionem verſus eos de Fac' inde qd 
© debito predict' de bonis & catallis que fuer” plene adm- 
c 2 5 niſttavit tem- 

predict” M. Teftatoris tempore mortis ſue pore emana- 
© in manibus ipſorum Martini Executoris T. tion! Brevis. 
& G. exiſten' adminiſtrand' habere non de- 
© bet. Quia dicunt qd” ipſi plene adminiſtra- 
© ver omnia bona & catalla que fuer* predict” 

M. Teſtator' tempore mortis ſue 8&-qd' ipſi 

nulla habent bona neque catalla que fuer” 

© predia? M. Teſtatoris tempore mortis ſue in 

© manibus ſuis adminiſtrand* neque habuerunt 

© die emanationis predict' Brevis de Scire fa- 

© cias neque unquam poſtea, Et hoc parati 

© ſunt verificare, &c. Unde petunt Judicium fi 

© predit” W. executionem verſus eos de debito 

© predi&'” de bonis & catallis que fuer* predict 

M. Teſtatoris tempore mortis ſue in manibus 

© ſuis adminiſtrand' exiſten habere debeat, &c. 

Et predict' W. dicit' qd” ipſe per aliqua Rep, Q' 

preallegat' ab executione ſua predict' verſus ha buei & Iſ- 

© eos de debito predict de bonis & catallis que ſue. 

* fuerunt predict M. Teſtatoris tempore mor- 

* tis ſue in manibus ipſorum M. Executot' T. 

© & G. exiſte” adminiſtrand' habend' preclu- 

* di non debet quia dic' ꝗd' predict M. Exe- 

* cutor T. & G. die emanation' predicti Brevis 

de Scire facias, ſcilt' 23 die Octobris Anno 
E@ 2 * Regni 


2 — — — em 3 
—— — ä £ 


c 


420 Bar in Debt per 


© Regni Domini Regis nunc decimo nono 
habuerunt diverſa bona & catalla que fuer? 
predit' M. Teſtatoris tempore mortis ſue 
adminiſtrand' ad valenc' debiti predict' unde 
eidem W. de debito predi& ſatisfeciſſe po. 
tuer” viz. apud London' in Parochia beate 
© Matic de arcubus in Warda de Chape, Et 
© hoc pet” qd' inquiratur per Patriam, Et pre- 
© dit” M. Executor' T. & G. ſimilit', Ideo 
© preceptum eſt qd' Venire fac' bic in Octab 
«© purificationis beate Marie duodecim & per 
| © quos, &c. Et qui nec, &c. ad recogn', &c. 
| © quia tam, &c. Vide 2 Saund. 220, Ce. 


F 


Plene Adminiſtravit preter, &c. Et Def 
prie Judgment de parcel de Dett', des 
biens confeſſe & reſid' de bonis in fu- 


Turo. 


Bar plene G. Ction' non, Quia dic* qd' ipſa plene 
adm' preter, adminiſtravic omnia bona & catalla 
&c. que fuer prefat' R. tempore mortis ſue, pre- 
terqm' bona & catalla ad valentiam 107. 
135. 104, Et qd' eadem A. nulla habet bona 
* ſeu catalla que fuer* predict' R. tempore mor- 
tis ſue in manibus ſuis adminiſtrand', nec ha- 
| buit die impetrac' Brevis Original predict 
| nec unquam poſtea preter bona & catalla ad 
| valenc* predict” 107. 135. 10d. Et hoc pa- 
; © rat” eſt verificare, Unde per” judic' fi pre- 
| 

| 

| 

| 


c 
* 


Cc 
c 
5 


dict' J. Action' ſuam predict' vers' eam ha- 
Def" pric © bere debeat, &c. Super quo predict' J. ex 
Judgment. quo predict” A. ſuperius cogn' qd” ipla bona 


© & catalla que fuer' preſat' R. tempore mor- 
ol 


tis ſue ad valenc' 10 J. 125. 10 d. in manibus 
* ſuis non adminiſtratꝰ habet petit judicium & 
- 


© 104. 137. 104, de debito ſuo predict' de 
* eiſdem 


* 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 


© eiſdem bonis & catallis, Ac reſiduum debiti 
© il de bonis & catallis que fuer predi& R. 
© non adminiſtrat* exiſten cum ad manus pre- 
* di” A. venire contingant adminiſtrand? le- 
* vand' unacum dampnis ſuis occaſione deten- 
© tion debiti ill fibi adjudicari, Ideo cons' eſt 
© q& predi& J. recuperet vers prefat' A. pre- 
© dit 101, 135. 10 d. de debito ſuo predict 
de pred bonis & catallis in manibus pred” A. 
© non adminiſtrat' exiſten', Ac reſid' debiti ill 
de bonis & catallis que fuer predict' R. tem- 
* pore mortis ſue & que in manus pred” A. in 
futuro ultra predict' bona & catalla in manibus 
© predi&” A. adminiſtrat' exiſten' Venire con- 
* tingant adminiſtrand? levand', necnon damp- 
© na ſua occaſione detention debiti il ad 
© 535. 44. eidem J. ex aſſenſu ſuo per Cur' 
hic adjudicat' de bonis & catallis ipſius A. 
* propr* levand', Et eadem A. in mia', &c. 
* Vide Aft. Ent. 281, 282. 


Def placitat' Retainer in ſes Mains. 


Admiſtrator pleads, That the Teſtator was 
indebted to him by Bond, and that he 
retains the Goods to ſatisfy his Debt. 
Aſt. 252. ut ſequitur. 


* ſuum Obl' geren' dat' 6 die N. Anno, &c. 
© concelliſſet ſe teneri eidem J. in centum 
* Marcis legalis mongte Angl ſolvend' eidem 
J. cum inde requiſit' fuiſſet, Poſteaque & ante 
* diem impetrac' Brevis Orig' ipſius H. pre- 


dict G. apud S. in Com S. obiit inteſtat', 
Poſt cujus mortem Adminiſtratio omnium 
Ee 3 do- 


421 


Judgment 
agard. 


Ction' non, quia dic' qd' predict' G. Def plac 
in vita ſua per quoddam ſcriptum dat Retainer, 


8 — : _ FI 2 
** X n 8 - oak "> - x was Ad; 5 ASL 


— rem. 
> duh 


I 


Fs — 


Retainer. 


— ———y— 


— —_— — —— — ano Sg — — — — 
— — 2 


Bar in Debt per 


© bonorum & catallorum que fuer' prefat' G. 
tempore mortis ſue per, &c. commiſſa fuit, 
© Poſt cujus quidem Adminiſtration” commiſ- 
© fionem idem J. bona & catalla que fuer” pre- 
© fat G. tempore mortis ſue ad valenc' pre- 
© dic centum Marcarum virtute predi& ſeript 
© Ob! per prefat' G. in vita ſua eidem J. fact 
jn manibus ſuis ad uſum ejuſdem J. retinuie 
© & adhuc retinet, Qd'q; ipſe nulla alia bona 
© ſeu catalla habet que fuer* predict G. tem- 
© pore mortis ſue nec habuit die impetrac' 
; Brevis Orig' predict H. ſeu unquam poſtea 
© in manibus ſuis adminiſtrand' ultra bona & 
* catalla ad valenc' predictꝰ Centum Marcarum, 
© Unde prefat' H. de debito predict' ſatisſe- 
* ciſle potuit, Et hoc, &c, Unde, &c. Vide 
. | 

. Similis Bar per Exec, That the Teſtator 
was indebted to him, and he retain'd the 
Goods in Satisfaction; and that he had no 
other Goods. Af. 259. 285. 2 

ff. © Retainer per Exec' ad ſatisfaciend' de- 
© bicum prope? ſuper ſcript' Ob. Repl, Qd' 
© Def? fuit Executor de ſon tort, Et iſſint ne 
* poiet detein. Thompſ. 15 6. 

/ © Similis Bar & Rep, Demurt' inde, & 
Judic' pro Quer', 1 146d. Intr. 199. 

. © Simile placitum per Adm'. Repl', Qd? 
habet bona ultra, Tbompſ. 166. 184. 

//. © Simile placitum, Et non habet bona 
* preterquam, &c. 1 Saund. 333. Vide po- 
© Itea. 
Per Adm' placitum qd? retinet bona in 
manibus erga ſolution” debiti per ſcript Obl 
* fot Def” per Inteſtat'. Rep!', Qd' Inteſtar? 


- 


non ſuit obligat Def”. Vidian 188. 


Cc 


f. © 


r rr 


£ 
1 


a hb y 
e 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 423 


. per ſeperal' Judic' vers Adm' in Banco ö 
Regis, Et qd retinet bona in manibus erga | 
© ſolution” debiti per ſcript” Obl' fact un' Def? f 


© & aſſump' alteri, Et qd? non habent bona 
© ultra. 1 Brown. 195. Vide Win. Ent. 258. 
See Clift's Preſ. 168. Retainer and Judg- 
ment pleaded by an Adminiſtrator. 


1 To Debt upon Bond to render Account of 
| what Goods and Money ſhould come to 
his Hands, &c. as Adminiſtrator. 


Defendant pleads, That no Goods or Money 
came to his Hands, &c. 


LI modo ad hunc diem ſcilt' diem Mer- 
; cur* prox” poſt quinden* Paſchæ iſto 
S © eodem Termino uſque quem diem predict' 
H. habuit licenc' ad Billam predict” interlo. 
© quendi & tunc ad reſpondend', &c. coram 
Domina Regina apud Weſtm' ven' tam pre- 
* dit E. H. per Attorn' ſuum predict quam 
* predic H. G. per J. C. Attorn' ſuum, Et 
8s © idem H. defend' vim & injur* quando, &c. 
6 Et petit' auditum fcripti obligatori ptedict', Def' prie 
| Et ei legitur, &c. Pet etiam auditum Con. Oyer. 
« ditionis ejuſdem ſcripti, Et ei legitur in hec 
verba. / The Condition of this Obliga- 
tion is ſuch, That if the above-bounden H. G. 
his Executors, or Adminiſtrators, or any of 
$ them, do and ſhall well and truly render a 
$ full Account unto the above-named E. H. his | 
Executors, or Adminiſtrators, of all ſuch Sum ; 
or Sums of Money, Rents, Goods, Bills, Bonds, | 
and Debts, which are due and belonging to 
Nm. N. late of the Pariſh of St. Martins in 
E e-4 the 


Imparlance, 


— ae. a 


424 Bar in Debt per N 
the Fields, in the County of Middlefex, Gent. 


— 
deceaſed, at the Time of his Death, which N 
ſhall any Ways come to his the ſaid Henry's a 
1 
c 
{ 


Hands and Poſſeſſion as Joint Adminiſtrator in 

Right of Anne his Wife, Daughter of the ſaid 

M. N. and ſhall upon ſuch Account within the 

Space of one Week, when requir'd, make an 

equal Dividend of all ſuch Sums of Money, 
Rents, Debts, and Goods, unto him the ſaid 11 
Edward, and pay and ſatiſy the ſaid Edward, | 
his Executors, or Adminiſtrators, his Propor- 


tion of the ſame ; that then this Obligation to | 
| be void, or elſe to be and remain in full Forge ] 
| and Vertue. * Quibus lectis & audit” idem H. 
* dic' qq predict E. Actionem ſuam predict | 
[ * inde verſus eum habere ſeu manutenere non 


[ Bar, Od nul- * debet quia dic” ꝗdꝰ nulla ſumma five ſumme 
la Bona, &c. pecunie reddit Bone Bille Obligationes five 
* debita quecunque que fuer” debita vel pertin | 
* prefat' W. N. in conditione predict' mentio- 
* nat' tempore mortis ſue devenerunt ad manus | 
© vel n eee ipſius H. ut conjunct' ad- 
* miniſtratoris in jure A. Ux' ipſius H. Et hoc 
© parat' eſt verificare unde pet' Judic' fi pre- 
© dit E. Actionem ſuam predict' inde verſus 
eum habere ſeu manutenere debeat, &c. | 
Rep!, Qa' Et predict' E. H. dic qd' ipſe per aliqua 
—4 1 E predict H. G. ſuperius allegat' ab actione 
Bowl, ven ad © ſua predict inde verſus prefat' H. G. Habend' 
| ſe mains. nnd! non debet quia dic' qd” poſt con- 
| * tectionem ſctipti obligator' predict” ſcilt” pri- 
mo die Decembris Anno Regni Domini Ca- 
| © roli ſecundi nunc Regis Ang!” &c. decimo 
| © octavo ſupradicto apud London predi& in 
| © Paroch' & Warda predict” una cratera argen- 
| | © tea (Anglice a Silver Bowl) ad valenc' trium 
= * lib” predict W. N. in conditione predict 
38 * ſuperius nominat' & eidem W. N. tempore 
| " 1 © more 
| 


. 


7 

Fl 
" 
# 


: 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 425 


© mortis ſue pertinenꝰ devenit ad manus & poſ- 

© ſeffion? predictꝰ H. G. ut conjun&t' Adm' in 

jure predict Ux' ſue & filie predict W. N. 

Et hoc ipſe idem E. H. parat' eſt verificare 

unde petit Judic' & debitum ſuum predict 
unacum dampn' ſuis occaſione detentionis de- 

biti illius ſibi adjudicare, &c. 

Defendant demurs, and the Plaintiff joins Onur 


in Demurrer. Vide 1 Saund. 101. 


On this Demurrer, Mr. Saunders argued, It the Plaine 
That the Plaintiff ought to have ſhewn a tiff ought 
Breach, that the Defendant had made no Di. to ſhew a 
vidend, or paid the Proportion; otherwiſe he * 
had ſhewn no Cauſe of Action, and put the 
Caſe of a Bond to perform an Award. 

2. That admitting the Plaintiff was not x he ought 
bound to ſhew a Breach in his Replication, yet nor to con- 
he ought to conclude to the Country, and not clude to the 
hoc paratus eſt verificare; for the Defendant had Country. 
pleaded in the negative, and the Plaintiff re- 


plied poſſitively in the affirmative, and fo an 


ſſue ought to have been, as by 1 Ia. 126. 4. 
So in Nev. 137. 

Mr. Jones for the Plaintiff argued, That in Seems he 
no Caſe, except in the Caſe of an Award, the ought not to 
Plaintiff is obliged to fhew a Breach, becauſe have ſhewa a 
an Award may be good in Part, and void in Breach. 
the other Part, therefore he ought to ſhew it, 
ſo that the Court may judge it he had well 
conceived his Action or not; for perhaps he 
had brought his Action for a Breach of that 
Part of the Award which is void in it ſelf, and 
ſo had no Cauſe of Action, and cited Griff 
and Spencer, Cro. 22. Elix. 320. & Cro, 

Elix. 899. & Nu. 24 And the Cale of Feffery 
and Guy, Yely. 78. That when a ſpecial Point is 
in Iſſue, the Plaintifft need not to ſhew more; 


1 and 


1 8 — — — 


426 


liter, per 
Cur', that he 
ought, and 
that the Con- 
cluſion was 


good. . 


Per Statute. 


Per Recogn', 
&c. & Repl 
continuance 
per Fraud, 
&. 


Bar in Debt per 


and as to eoncluding Al Pais, he ſaid not 
much, but that the Defendant ought to have 
rejoin'd, and tender'd the Iſſue. But the 
Court held the Replication ill, becauſe the 
Plaintiff had not ſhewn any Breach, bur ſaid 
it was well concluded, and as it ought, Quod 
mirum mibi videtur, ſays the Reporter; for he 
held that the Replication was ill for that Point, 
but good enough for the other, of not ſhewing 
Breach as Mr. ones had argued, for that the 
Books cited by him were very good in the 
Point. But the Court being ready, aſter their 
Opinions deliver'd ſeriatim, to give Judgment 
for the Detendant, at the Inſtance of the Plain- 
tiff's Council, by Aſſent the Matter was re- 
ferr'd to Mr. Jones and Mr. Saunders to com- 
promile, &c. Vide 1 Saund, 102, 103. 


Exec plede Bar per Statut &. Recogni- 


zance, Oc. 


* B per Statut' Stapl', Et qq' non 
8 habet bona ultra, &c. Repl', Per 
© Defeaſance pro Per ſormat' Convention? In- 
* dentur* Barganie & Vedition' quarum nulla 
* frat', Demurrer inde, Co Ent. 146, Simile, 
© Winch. Ent, 307. | 
ff. Bar per ſeveral Recognizances and Sta- 
tutes. Repl', That one of them was for Se- 
curity, and that the Defendant had paid the 
Money; that another was for Security of Per- 
formance of Covenants quarum nulla frat??, and 
that another was ſatisfied by the Teſtator ; that 
the Statutes remain'd uncancell'd by Fraud, 
and that the Defendant had bona ultra 100 l. ad 
ſab i faciend Regi, Et Demurr' inde, Co. Ent. 152. 
9 Co. 108. Simile Winch Ent. 178. 
J. © Simile 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 427 


. * Simile Wi. Ent. 242. & Fraud. 

Bar per Statut' & ſeperal' Judic? vers“ Per Statut 
© Teſtat', & Judic' verſus Exec, Et plene adm? & Judic'. 
* preter. Thompſ. 164, 166, Hanſ. 109, 

C. © Bar per Recogn' cogn' Camerario Civit' Per Recogn'. 
London per Teſtatorem, de denar' perti- 
* nen' Orphan” Civit' predi&”, Et plene Adm' 
| * preter. Thompſ. 172. 
. © Bar per Statut' Stapul cogn' corgm Ca- Per Stat? Sta- 
| * pital' Juſtic' de C. B. per Teſtatorem, & Þvul. 
| * plene adm' preter. Rob. Ent. 203, 218. 

J. Againſt an Executor upon Bond. Bar, Rep!, That 


e 
? 
4 
b 
| 
1 
| 


That the Inteſtate was bound in a Recognizance the Recogn' 
I in the Nature of a Statute Staple of 6091. Cc. * extended. 
I. qa plene adn preter bona ad valenc 12 d. 
Replication, That the Recognizance was ex- 


tended, c Demurrer thereupon, and Judg. 
ment for the Defendant, 1 Zur. 429, Cc. 


Judgments pleaded by Executors and Ad- 


miniſtrators. 


VA EK E Executor pleads a Judgment had Againſt Bre- 
1 againſt himſelf, Aſt. 253. Simile in cutor. 
zee Regis. Id. 254. Et RepP que ot” on, e 
fuit ad per Fraud, 14,255. Et Exit inde. 
/ © Adm? placitat' Judic' in Com' Banco Againſt In. 
© vers? Inteſtat', Et ſeperal' Judic' vers Adm' teſtate. 
& plene Adm? preter, 2 Brown, 87. Simile 


le i Banco Regis, Clifts Ent. 160, 161, 170. 
0 | Bar per Judic' obtent? vers Adm' in Ban- Vers Adm'. 
e 


co Regis, Et plene adm' preter, 2 Brown. 96. 

F | * Tocmpſ. 140. 215. Simile Clift. 167, 348, ö 
z © 249, | 

” 7 Bar per Judic? obtent' vers? Teſtator' in Vers! Teſta 
= C. B. & plene Adm' preter. Repl', Qd' ha- tor. 
bet bona ultra, Vidian 178. Simile Clift. 162. 

q © Simile 


: 428 


Vers 2 Exec 
Demur & 


Vers Teſt'. 


Vers — i 
Rep! pe 


Bar in Debt per 


© Simile per Exec & unum ſatisſact pla- 
 citat, 1d. Clift. 163. | 

* "Debt vers 2 Exec? W. Bar per un qd' 
VW. obiit inteſtat', & Adminiſtratio fuit com- 
© miſs Def', Et qq un' E. recuperavit Judic 
N * vers eum in Coi' Banco pro 2010. ultra quas 

non habet bona, Per al plene Adm' general”, 
© Demurr' al primum placitum, Iſſue al auter, 
© Co. Ent. 148. Vide Winch. Ent. 247. 

6. D pleads another Judgment obtain d 
againſt his Teſtator. Et qd' plene Adminiſtravit 
preter, & c. Aſt. 255. 

Executors plead a Judgment obtain'd 
againſt them in the Stannary Court, and ano- 


din Cur ther in the Common. Pleas- Plaintiff replies, 


Inferior. 


Simile Fraud. 


Vers' Exec 
ut Adm'. 


Vers' Adm' 
ut Exec'. 


Vers Ux' 
dum ſola. 


> . * > 4 * 2 8 
— — — — — —— —— — —ę— — 


Per Adm' 
ſuperviven'. 


Sur mutuat'. 


_— D 
0. N N „ 
RR — 


That one of the Judgments was ſatisfied, and 
continued by Fraud. Rejoinder, That the 
Judgment is in full Force, and traverſes the 
Fraud. Af. 258. 

* 0 er Gore? 3 udic' in Cur' Inferior, 
; Le P al Pare per Law hs ad al per Sa- 
4 ickiaionem, Et Judic' reman' ſine ſatisfa- 
* &ion' cognit' per Fraudem. 8 Co. 132. 

Debt is brought againſt an Executor. Bar 
by a Judgment obtained againſt him by the 
Name of Adminiſtrator in Co Banco. De- 
murr inde, Co. Ent. 148. 

J. Simile vers Adm', Et Bar per Judi: 

© cium vers' eum per nomen Exec' in Banco 
* Regis, Et Demurr' inde, [dem 149. 

. * Bar' per Virum & Url per 
© Judic” _ vers Ux' dum fola. Clifr' 
* 182. i 

* Judic* placitat' per Adm? ſuperviven' | 
2 Lac, de bonis non. Clift. 166, 171. 

3 Executrix placitat Judic' recuperat' 

© {ur mutuat per Teſtator”. Clift, 177. 


J. Ex. 


1 — "a Ay 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 429 


F. © Executrix placitat* Judic' in Conven- In Cov's && 
© tion” frat”, Et qd' plene Adminiſtravit pre- Rep! per 
» | © ter, &c. que non ſufficien', Clifr. 178. RepV Fraud. 
© per Fraudem & Covinam 181. Et Rejunctio 


> | © cum traverſia Fraudis, Et exit. Did. 

: . © Bar per Judic' in Banco Regis, Et qd* rey nul t iel 
„non habet bona ultra: Repl per nul tiel Ronan. ; 
j | © Record, Et nichil dic' inde. Co. Ent. 269. 


V © Bar per Exec' qd' Teſtator ante diem «< g 

4 redditionis Judicii vers eum obiit, Repl', 2 

-+ | © Qd' fuit in vita & travers ꝗd' obiit ante, Et Judi. 
Iſſue ſur travers, Thompſ. 198. 

d , © Bar per Adm', ꝗd' poſt Orig Quer', per Judic 

* VUn' E. proſecut' Orig' vers Def? fur Obl' vers Adm'. 

s, pro 200 l. & habuit judic' ſuperinde, Et qd 

d non habet bona ultra. Demurr' inde. i. 

* Ent. 188. 


\ Aliter de Fraud, ſur Judic', &c. 


a- * AR per ſeperalia Judic' in Coi' Ban- : 
, J B co vers Teſtatorem & plene adm' * 
* preter. Repl', Qd' Teſtator ſolvit 306 l. dic reman' 
ar * parcell' 600 J. per E. recuperat', (Et ſic de per Fraudem, 
he ſceteris) in plenam ſatisfaction” & Judicia re- &C. 
ze. & © manent minime exonerat, ad intentionem 
' |} © defraudand' Quer*. Rejo', Qd' Judic' reman' 
i- in vi, Et travers le Fraud?. Surrejo' & Exit. 
co © Thompſ. 157. Vide 2 44. Intr. 238. | 
 YJV. © Judic' placit' per Exec. Repl, Qd' Several Bars. 
der habet bona ultra & Iſſue, Et ad ſcript” Ob! | 
fi's | qꝗd' fuir fact per Fraudem. Rejo', QU non 
uit fact' per Fraudem, Et Iſſue. 2 Brown. 73, | 
en FL: © Similis Bar per Exec'. Rep!', Qd' Ju- Obtente per | 
© dic fuit obtent per Fraudem, Tbompſ. 149. Fraudem. 
-at KY * Similis Bar, ſimilis Repl', Rejo' per Mainte- 
* nance de Bar, Et traverſe le Fraud & Iſſue - 
* luperinde. Id. 179. Vidian 175. 
Ex. | J. © Bar 


** 


— 
— — FRE FEE" 
_— = ——= — —— — — * — = .- 


CT — ——— 
Ee oo do 
"__ + 2 * 

— — — 


* 


— 


2 ** 
— — 
—— 


430 
Payment & 
Judic' rem' 


per Fraudem. 


Bar in Debt per 


Bar per Judic' in Banco Regis vers 


© Exec', &c. Rep!, Qd' Def* poſt Judicꝰ 
© folvit 600 l. in plen' ſatisfaction & Judic” 


remanet minime exonerat' per Fraudem. 


Several Repl'. 


Repr. 


Aſſets. 


Rep! al' Re- 
tainer. 


Par ſolut' per 
al' perſon”, 


Fraud. 


Eight ſeveral 


Judgments 


pleaded in 
Bar. 


© Rejo”, Qd' Judic' reman' in vi, Et travers“ 
© le Fraud. Vidian 181. 

ſj. © Repl per bona ultra quoad unum Judi- 
© cium & Fraudem quoad alterum, Clift 35 3. 


. © Rept, Qd' talis ſumma & non amplius 


* eſt debit” ſuper ſcript? Obl'. Clift 354. 
. Rep, Qd' Aſſets ultra. Lid. 
. Repl' ad retention ꝗd' le Creditor parat' 


© fuir recipere talem ſummam & ad deliberand* | 


* ſcript Obl' & ad relaxand' Def', Et qd' 
© Det” habuit ſufficien* die Impetrac' Original”, 
* Clift 354. 

ff. © Repl', Qd' maxima pars denar' fuit ſo- 
© lut' per ai” perſonas & non per Def?, Et Cre. 
* dicor tali die obtulit Det? recipe talem ſum. 
© mam in ſatisfactione Judicii, Et qd' Def? ha- 
6 buit fufficien', &c. Clift 355. 

ſj. © Kep!', Qd' Quer' dedit Def? notic' de 
© Brevi cali die, quo die Def habuit ſufficien'. 
* Clift 355. 


ſj. © Repl, Quoad Recupationem placit' per 


W. qd' habit” fuit per Fraudem, & quoad Re. 
* cuperation' placitat' per R. & M. &denar' ſu- 
© perinde levat', qq* Creditor tenuit fe fatisfaQ” 
cum denar' ill, fed Det” deceptive diſtuler 
* exonerari. Clift. 356. 


. Defendant E. V. Executor, pleads Plene 
Adminiſtravit generally, Bro. Vad. 193. The 
other Execut ix F. C. faich, Thar ſhe lives in 
Middleſex, and not in London, and that ſhe had 
no Notice of the Plaintiff's Action before 
24 Mat, 24 Car, 2. and fo pleads Plene admi- 
ſtravit beſoſe that Time of all the Teſtator's 

Goods, 


K«K % 


1 


al 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 431 
Goods, &c. beſides Aſſets to the Value of 
868 J. 44, And as to that, ſhe pleads, 


1. That ſhe paid 108 J. 125. 8 d. in Diſ- 
charge of a Judgment obtain'd againſt her by 
one * S. upon a Bond of the Teſtator's of 
200 bs 

2. That ſhe paid 106 J. 5 . in Diſcharge of 

| a Judgment obtain'd againſt her by one J. H. 
upon a Bond of the Teſtator's for 2007. 

3. That ſhe paid 102 J. 155. 84. in Dif: 

charge of a Judgment obtain'd againſt her by 
* || the * A. upon a Bond of the Teſtator's of 
| 2004. 

I 4. That ſhe paid 1011. 105. in Diſcharge of 
, | 2 Judgment obtain'd againſt her by one J. B. 
upon a Bond of the Teſtator's, of 200 l. 

) 5. That ſhe paid 102 J. 19s. 84. to one 
>. T. O. in Diſcharge of a Judgment obtain d 
n. 2 her, upon a Bond of the Teſtator's ſor 

A- 2001. 
6. That ſhe paid the like Sum of 102 l. 195. 8 d. 
Je to the ſaid O. in Diſcharge of a Judgment 
. which he obtain'd againſt this Defendant, up- 
on a Bond of the Teſtator's of 200 /. 
er J. That ſhe paid 20 J. to V. B. and AM. his 
de- Wife, in Diſcharge of a Judgment againſt ob- 
u- tain'd her by the ſaid /. and M. upon a Bond 
A of the Teſtator's of 200 J. 
8. That ſhe paid 222/, 133. 8 d. in Dil- 
charge of a Judgment obtain'd againſt her by 


one x T. upon a Bond of the Teſtator's for 
2001. 


RepP, That the Defendant E. V. had Aſſets Rep", Pare 


at the Time of the Action brought, 3 


* Sufficient to pay the Plaintiff's Debt and l Fraud. 
ue. 


2. Pro- 


=- 
. —— — — — — Eb z — — — — ——— 1 — ts jp. 8 1 


43⁰ 


Adminiſtra- 
tor pleads ſe- 
veral Judg- 
ments ob- 
tained. 


Repl' ad per 
Fraud, 


—— —— 


Bar in Debt per 


2. Proteſtando, That the ſeveral Judgments 
mentioned in the Plea of the Defendant F. to 
be recover'd againſt her, were obtain'd b 
Fraud, to the Intent to deceive the Plaintiff 
of his juſt Debt ; and that ſhe had Notice of 
the Plaintiff's Action before the ſaid 24th of 
May. 

4 Pro placito, That the ſaid 24 Maii ſhe 
had Aſſets ſufficient to ſatisfie the ſaid Plain- 
tiff his Debt, and Iſſue thereupon. Vide Bro. 
Vad. from 181, to 299. 


J The Defendant being ſued as Admini- 
ſtrator, pleads ſeveral Jugments obtain'd againſt 
him for the Debts of the Inteſtate, and Exe- 
cutions againſt the Defendant thereupon, and 
ſo pleads Plene adm preter, cc. To which the 
Plaintiff replies, That the Defendant paid 60 /, 
in Satisfaction of the Judgments ; and that the 
Judgments were thereupon continued on Foot 
with Intent to defraud the Plaintiff of his juſt 
Debt; and ſaith, the Defendant had Aſſets at 
the Time the Plaintiff firſt commenced his Suit, 
Whereupon the Defendant rejoins, That the 
Judgments were obtain'd bona fide, and not by 
Fraud, and takes Iſſue thereupon : And as to 
his having Aſſets at the Time of the Gommence- 
ment of the Plaintiff's Action ultra & preter, &c. 
the Defendant demurs generally, To the Iſſue 
taken by the Defendant in the firſt Part of his 
Re joinder, the Plaintiff demurs generally, and 


Joins with the Defendant in his Demurrer. The 


Judgment of the Court upon the whole, with 
the Entiy of a Nolle Proſequi thereupon, wide 
Bro. Vad. 298, 299, Cc. 


J. Several Debts and Judgments againſt the 
Teſtator and Executors pleaded in Bar by the 


Executors to an Action brought upon the Te- 


ſtator's | 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 433 


ſtator's Bond; with Replication, to ſome by Some by 


Fraud, others by Satisfaction, &c. with Re. Fraud, and 
joinder , Surrejoinder, and Iſſue. Bro. Met. — 
xn oy, .- ; 
lem 223. Replication, That there was Satisfaction 
ſo much Money paid in full Satisfaction of one and Aſſets 


Judgment, and Goods and Chattels beyond the Plede. 


y the 


other Judgment. 


Debt againſt an Adminiſtrator upon a pax per ſe. 


Bill penal of 60. for the Payment of. 33 J. veral Judg- 


21 Nov. 30 Car. 2. The Defendant in Bar ments. 
pleads ſeveral Judgments upon Bonds made by 

the Inteſtate, & Repl', That at the Time Rep, Not 
of the ſaid Judgments there was not due upon above ſo 

all the Bonds above 48 J. 10 5s. which would _ — 4 
be accepted in Satisfaction thereof; and that |, — 


the Defendant had Aſſets to ſatisfy the Plaintiff . 


over the 48 J. 105. Defendant demuts, and Pefendant 


the Opinion of the Court was, That the Re- demurs. 
plication was ill, for that there is nothing there. 
in alledged upon which the Defendant was 
compellable to take an Iſſue; for the Allega- 
tion, that the 48 J. 10. would be taken in full 
Satisfaction of the Judgments, is not iſſuable, for 
it is a Secret Matter, and perhaps was not 
known to the Defendant, and is only Evidence 
of Fraud; and to take Iſſue, that he had Aſſets 
ſufficient to ſatisfy the ſaid 487. 105. and alſo 
the Plaintiff's Debt, he was not compellable, 
becauſe thereby it ſhould be admitted, that fo 
much would be accepted in Satisfaction of the 


| Judgments, which is unreaſonable. But per Cur?, The true 


= : ; ay to have 
the true Way to plead in this Caſe, had been as ef. rt 


in Thompſon and Hunt's Caſe, 3 Lev. 368. where this Cafe, 
in the like Caſe as here, the Plaintiff replied, 
That the Creditors would accept of lefler Sums 


AY than their due Debts, and offer'd fo to accept 
ator 


them, and that the Defendant would not pay 
Ff them, 


— — | 


434 | Bar in Debt per 

| them, but kept the Judgments on Foot by Fraud 
and Covin to deceive Creditors. Vide x Lut. 
445, & 450. And it is there alſo referr'd to 
3 Lev, 311. Knighton ver! Morton, where in 
the like Caſe it is alledged, That the Defendant 
had Aſſets ſufficient to ſatisfy the Judgments 
and the Plaintiff, and not the leſſer Sums only, | 
which, as is there ſaid, is the material Part of | 
Plea, Vide Co. 8. 32. b. 

Demui all J. Vide 1 Lat. 451, &c. Debt for 1507, 

Nar' per AG againſt the Defendant, Adminiſtratrix of the 

ſigneede Marquiſs of Dore”, brought by an Aſſignee of 

Bankrupcy. the Commiſſioners of a Bankrupt. Deſen- 
dant demurs to the Narr', and Judgment pro 


{ 
( 
Quer“. N 
p c 
Debt againſt an Adminiſtrator upon a Bond, 
c 

c 

0 

c 

c 


enter d into by the Inteſtate, Secund' 
I Saund. 329. 


Adminiſtrator pleads Judgment againſt the 
e and againſt the Adminiſtrator | 
himſelf, and that the Inteſtate was in- 

| debted to him; and that he had fully ad- 

[i #iniſired, Et non habuit bona ultra 

| 721. which he retain'd towards his om 

F 
e 


Debt, and 1001. charged with the ſaid 


Judgments. 
ö . I 
WW! . 3 T modo ad hunc diem ſcilt” diem Met. 
| I lar.C2, 

| .d prox poſt quinden'” Paſche iſto eo: 
1 dem Termino uſq; quem diem predict R. P. © 
| | © habuit licenc' ad Billam predi&' interloquen- 1 
it | di, Et tunc' ad reſpond”, &c. coram Do- : 

| 

| B 


| mino Rege apud Weſtm' ven' tam predict 
J. H. in propr” perſona ſua quam pred? R P. 
peels pet 


— — 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 435 


© per W. W. Attorn' ſuvm, Et idem R. de- 
© fend” vim & injur' quando, &c. Et dic qd? Bar per Re- 
© pred' T. Actionem ſuam predict inde verſus corety vers 
eum habere ſeu manutenere non debet quia le Inteſtate. 
dic quod quidam Johannes Wood unus At- 
© torn' Cur' Domini Regis de Banco alias ſcilt' 
| © Termino ſancti Hillar Anno Regni dicti 
© Domini Regis nunc decimo nono & viceſimo 
„ coram O. B. MiP & Bar' & Sociis ſuis tunc 
» | © Juſtic? ipſius Domini Regis de Banco apud 
if | Weſtm' per conſiderationem ejuſdem Cur' 
* tecuperavit verſus prefat' W. Y. in vita ſua 
„per nomen W. . nuper de A. in Com' pre- 
dict' Gen' al's dict' W. V. de A. in Com 
© Salop Gen? tam quoddam debitum 20 l. quam 
30s. qui eidem]. in eadem Cur' adjudicat? 
d, fuer pro dampnis ſuis que habuit occaſione 
l detentionis debiti illius unde convict' eſt 
* prout per Recordum & proceſs inde in pre- 
dict' Cur' dicti Domini Regis de Banco pre- 
the dict' apud Weſtminſt' predict' reſiden' ple- 
or nius apparet, Et idem Richardus ulterius dic 
in- quod quidam T. C. Gen al's ſcilt' predict 
4. J Termino ſancti Hill' Annis Regni dicti Do- 
mini Regis nunc 19 & 20. ſupradictꝰ coram ,,, _ . 
Itra prefat' O. B. Mil' & Bar' & Sociis ſuis tunc 2 * 
ow! Þ Juſtic' ipſius Domini Regis de Banco predict' jeg, © 
ſaid apud Weſtm' predict' per conſiderationem 
ejuſdem Cur' recuperavit verſus prefat' W. V. 
in vita ſua per nomen W. X. nuper de A. 
Met. I in Com” Salop Gen' tam quoddam debitum 
o eb 10 l. quam 50s. qui eidem J. C. in eadem 
R. P. our! adjudicat' fuer” pro dampnis ſuis que 
en- habuit occaſione detentionis debiti illius unde 
Do- convict eſt prout per Record' & proceſs in- 
edi de in predict Cur dicti Domini Regis de 
R. p. Banco predict' apud Weſtm' predict' reſiden 
© pet plenius apparet, Et idem R. ulterius dic 
5 | Fi 2 - 


1 = - - As — — — — * * — — LY — 


— — ͤ . - © BIDS 
— — 22 ͤ ͤ — TESTO 


5 P 


— — — 
3 - 


rr —— ANY: 


436 


— 


Bar in Debt per 


Ar Recovery © quod predict W. X. in vita ſua. ſcilt octavo 


vers Adm' 


© die Decembr' Anno Regni dicti Domini Re- 


per Original. c gis nunc quinto decimo apud villam Salop in 


Original 
Pros'. 


Com predict per quoddam fcriprum ſuum 
© obligatorium ſigillo ſuo ſigillatꝰ geren dar” eif- 
dem die & Anno conceſſit fe teneri & firmit* 
© obligari cuidam M. J. vid' Centum & ſexa- 
© gint” libris ſolvend' eid' M. cum inde requiſit? | 
ſuiſſet que quidem 1601. tempore mortis pred” 
© W.Y. fuer' verum & juſtum debitum ipſius 
© W. & preſat' M. debit' & inſolut' fuer, per 
© quod eadem M. pro recuperatione earun- 
© dem 1601, poſt mortem predict W. X. ſcilt 
* tertio die Aprilis Anno Regni dicti Domini 
Regis nunc viceſimo, proſecut' fuit extra Cur' 
© Cancellar” dicti Domini Regis (eadem Can. 
© cellar” apud Weſtm' predi&' tunc exiſten') 
© quoddam Breve Original ipſius Domini Re- 
© Bis verſus ipſum R. ut adminiſtr' bonor' & 
© catallor' que fuer* prefat' W. Y. predict' per 
nomen R. P. nuper de villa Salop in Com'f 
predict Drapier Adminiſtratoris bonor' & 
© catallor* que fuer” W. Y. Gen qui obiit in.] 
© teſtat', &c. nuper dicti W. V. de Atcham 
in Com Salop, Teoman, de placito debiti 
* ſuper demand” predict 160 l. tune Vic? Sz 
© lop dire&' per quod quidem Breve idem Do- 
minus Rex nunc eidem tunc Vic' Salop pre 
© cepit q@' ipſe preciperet eidem R. quod juſt 
* & ſine dilatione redderet prefat' M. predia 
© 160], quas ei tunc injuſte detinuit ut dixi 
Et niſi feciſſet & predict'ꝰ M. feciſſet ipſu 
* Vic' ſecur' de clamore ſuo proſequend' tun 
idem Vic? ſum” per bonos ſum” ipſum 
© quod eſſet coram Juſtic' dicti Domini Rex 
apud Weſtm' predict' a die Paſche in unu 
* menſem tunc prox” ſequen oſtens quare 10 
* fecillet, Et gd” haberet tunc ibm _ 
3 ſe 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 


© Breve illud, &c. Ad quem diem ſcilt' ad pre- 
© fat? menſem Paſche coram prefat' O. B. Mil 
© & Bar' & Sociis ſuis tunc Juſtic' ipſius Do- 
mini Regis de Banco predict apud Weſtm' 
predictꝰ ven tam predict? M. per R. B. cunc 
© Attorn' ſuum quam predict' R. per T. M. 
* tunc Attorn' ſuum, Et tunc Vic Salop videlt' 
R. O. Ar? eiſdem Juſtic? adtune & ibm 
© mandavit qd* predict M. inveniſſet eidem 
© Vic' pleg' de pros Breve ſuum predict' ſciltꝰ 
J. Doe & R. Roe, Et quod idem R. nihil 
© habuit in Balliva ſua ubi ſum' potuit, &c. 
* ſuper quo predi&? M. narrando verſus ipſum 
KR. ſuper Brevi ſuo predict per Atrorn? 
© ſuum predict' dixit quod cum predict W. in 
* vita ſua ſcilt predict octavo die Decembris 
Anno Regni Domini Caroli ſecundi nunc 
© Regis Ang!?, &c. quinto decimo ſupradict 
apud Villam Salop predict' per ſcriprum ſuum 
* obligator* predict” conceſſiſſet ſe teneri pre- 
* far M. in predict 1691. ſolvend' eidem M. 


+ cum inde requiſitꝰ fuillet predictꝰ tamen W. 


in vita ſua ſeu predia? R. poſt mortem ipſius 
W. cui quidem R adminiſtratio omnium & 
* ſingulor' bonorum & catallorum que fuer' pre- 
dict W. tempore mortis ſue poſt mortem ip- 
* fius W. apud Villam Salop predict debito mo- 
do commilla fuit licet ſepius requiſit' predict 

160 l. eidem M. non reddidiſſent fed ill” ei 

reddere contradixiſſent ac predict R. ill” ei 


unde tunc dixit qd” dete iorat' fuit & damp- 
num habuit ad valenc? 20 l. Et inde produxit 
ſectam, &c. Et protulit tune ihm' in Cur? 
ſcriptum predict quod debitum predict' in 
forma predict teſtabatur cujus dat? fuit die 
© & Anno ſupradictis, &c. Et idem R. per At- 
* torn? ſuum predict' tune defend vim & in. 
* jur* quando, &c, Et idem Attorn? dixit quod 
— 1 2 
vi 3 * iple 


4 
* 
© adtunc reddere contradixit ac injuſte detinuit 
c 
0 


427 


Nat ſuper- 


* 
. e Y 
3 


PSII EY 
— ——_ 


3 8 3. _ e 9 . - 8 5 3 


5 — 
8 n 


438 Bar in Debt per 
Non inform. . ipſe non fuit informar* per eundem R. Magi. 
c {trum ſunm de aliquo reſponsꝰ pro eod' R. pre- 
© fa& M. in loquela predict' dand', Et nihil aliud 
© inde dixit per quod eadem M. temanſit ver- 
Judgment fus preſat' R. inde indefens', Ideo tunc con- 
vers Adm. © ſiderat' fuit per eandem Cut' qd” predict M. 
72 5 recuperaret: verſus preſatꝰ R. debitum ſuum 
predict? & dampna ſua occalione detentionis 
debiti illius ad 625. eidem M. ex aſſenſu 
ſuo per Cur predict? ibm? adjudicat' de bo- 
nis & catallis que fuer* predict' W. tempore 
mortis ſue in manibus predict? R. exiſten ad- 
miniſtrand* levand' {i tantum inde habuit, 
Et fi non habuit tune dampna predict de bo- 
nis 8 catallis prefat' R. propr? levand', Et 
qd” predict? R. tunc eſſet in Mia', &c. prout 
per Recordum & proceſſum inde in predict' 
Cur' dicti Domini Regis de Banco predict' 
apud Weltm' predict reliden' plenius apparet. 
Et idem R. ulterius dic' quod predict W. V. 
in vita ſua ſcilt” 28 die Junii Anno Regni dicti 
Domini Regis 19. apud W. in Com' pre- 
di? per quoddam fcriptum ſuum Obligato- 
rium ſigillo ſuo ſigillat' geren dat eiſdem die 
& Anno devenit tent' & obligatꝭ cuidam ]. O. 
Spinfter, in roo l. ſolvend' eidem J. cum inde 
requiſic? fuiſſet que quidem 1091. tempore 
mortis predict' W. ſuer verum & juſtum de- 
bitum ipſius W. ac prefat's], debit, & inſolut' 
tuer”, per quod predictꝰ J. poſt mortem pre- 
di&' W. ſcilt' Termino Paſche Anno Regni 
dicti Domini Regis nunc viceſimo ven” in 
Cur? dicti Domini Regis coram ipſe Rege 
hic ſcilt' apud Weſtm' predictꝰ per T. J. tunc 
Attorn' ſuum, Et protulit ia cadem Cur' 
dicti Domini Regis tunc hic quandam Billam 
ſuam verſus ioſum R. ut Adminiſtrator? bo- 
norum & oatallorum que fuer” predict W. V. 
pet nomen R. P. adminiſtr' omnium & ſigu- 
4 C or 


*% © 5 A 


AV Recovery 
vers” Adm'. 


f 


| 
| 
| 
| 


M A A ian GH Hm nA NM 6 & 9 © 


8 


„% $> . %ꝶ Wn, DS Wh, © 


7 
7 
x, 
5 
yg 
2 
1 


' 


— 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 439 

© jor? bonorum & catallor? Jur* & creditor' que | 

© fuer” W. Y. deſunct nuper dicti Gulielmi Yope 

© de Atcham in Com? Salop Gen' defun& in 

Cuſtod' Mar', 8c, de placito debit”, Et ad- 

© tpnc & ibm' invenit* pleg* de pros Billam Nar' inde. 

* fuam predict᷑ ſcilt? J. D. & R. R. per quam qui- 

dem Billam predict' J. querebatur de eodem 

R. P. ut Adminiſtratore bonorum & catal- 

| © lorum que fuer” predict W. v. predi& per 

nomen R. P. Adminiſtrat omnium & ſigu- 

8 © lor” bonorum & catallorum jurium & credi- 

4 © tor” que fuer! W. V. defunct' nuper dicti 

2 Gulielmi Yope de Atcham in Com' Salop 

* © Geri defun& tunc in cuſtod' Marr? Mareſc' 

Domini Regis coram 'ipſo Rege exiſten' de 

pplacito quod redderet ei Centum libras lega- 

* lis monet' Angl' quas ei tunc injuſte detinuit 

* pro eo videlt' qdꝰ cum predict“ W. V. in vita 

i ſua ſcilt' predi& viceſimo octavo die Junii 
Anno regni Domini Caroli ſecundi nunc Re- 


— - —2 2 2 1 = 
au... eva — WW -< — — 4 be. 
— - p — 1— >. . 


— 
1 


—— IT Fortr En nn 
«mm tt — ——— 


. 
N © 
3 al a Cee ESD Ia ant ax 


* gis Anglie, &c. ' decimo nono ſupradicto 


i 
- apud Wellington in Com predict' per quod- 
4 © dam ſcriptum ſuum Obligatorium ſigillo ip- 
e © fius W. in vita ſua figillate? Curg; dicti Do- 
. mini Regis nunc, tunc hic oftens' cujus dat' eſt 
© | © eildem die & Anno cognoviſſet fe teneri & 
© | © firmicobligari prefat' J. O. in predict' 1091, 
ſolvend' eidem J. cum inde requiſit” eſſet 
predict tamen W. Y. in vita ſua ſeu preſat' 
ER. P. poſt ipſius W. Y. mortem licet ſepius 
1 © requilit, &c. predict 1091. eidem J. tune 
n © © non ſolviſſet ſed ill? predict Wilbus in vita 
© if © ſua & predict' R. poſt ipſius W. Y. mortem 


— GGG 


K 
— MO 


C It © uſque tunc ſolvere omnio contradixer' & pre- | 
r © dit R. adtunc ſolvete contradixit & injuſte 
n IF detinuit ad dampnam ipſius J. viginti libr', 
Et inde produxit ſectam, &c. Et predictꝰ Cogn' Actio- 
. K. P. per J. W. tunc Attorn' ſuum ven & nem per 

„ Ff 4 © defend? Adm, 

1 


4 Bar in Debt per 


© defend? vim & iojur? quando, &c. Et tunc 


© dixit pred iple non potuit dedicere actionem 
© predict” J. predict' nec quin ipſe debuit pre- 
* far” J. predict Centum libras modo & forma 
* prout predictꝰ J. ſuperius verſus eum quere- 

Judgment, batur, Ideo adtunc & ibm? conſiderat fuit 
per eandem Cur” quod predict J. recupe- 
© raret verſus prefat R. debitum ſuum pre- 
dict' nec non viginti & quinque ſolid pro 
* dampnis ſuis que ſuſtinuiſſet tam occaſione de- 
* tenſjonis debiti illius qm promiſs' & caſtag” 
* ſuis per ipſam circa ſectam ſuam in ea parte 
* appoſit? prefat' J. per dictam Cur* dicti Do- 
mini Regis nunc hic ex aſſenſu ſuo adjudicat” 
de bonis & catallis que fuer' predict W. tem- 
pore mortis ſue in manibus predict R. admi- 
© niſtrand” fi tantum in manibus ſuis haberet, 
* 


4 


dampna predict' de bonis & catallis ipſius R. 
propr* levand', quodque predict R. tunc eſſet 
in Mia', &c. prout per Recordum & proceſ- 
ſum inde in eadem Cur' dicti Domini Regis 
coram ipſo Rege hic remanen' plenius appa- 
ret, Que quidem ſeperalia Judicia ſic ut pre- 
fertur reddit adhuc in ſuis pleno robore & ef- 
fetu remanent mie” reverſat' ſive adnullat' 
ſeu ſatisſact', Et idem R. ulterius dicꝰ quod 

redict' W. I. in vita ſua ſciltꝰ octavo die 
Juni Anno Regni dicti Domini Regis nunc 


Averment of 
the Judg- 
ment's Vali- 
dity. 

Debt to the 
Adminiſtra- 


c 
* 

c 

c 

c 

c 

c 

0 

c 

c 

ror himſelf. « 
c 

c 

c 

c 

c 

c 

q 

0 

A 


— CCC 


Com' Salop pio vero & juſto debito ſuo per 
quoddam fcriprum ſuum obligatorium ſigillo 
ſuo ſigillat geren' dar” eiſdem die & Anno 


Part paid by cConceſſit ſe teneri eidem R. in 1601. ſol- 


the Inteſtate. 


predictuſque W. in vita ſua de ſeptem libris 
& duodecim ſolid' inde eidem R. ſatisſecit 


Adem 


Et ſi tantum in manibus ſuis non haberet tunc 


quarto decimo apud Barrington predict” in | 


vend' eidem R. cum inde requiſit' fuiſſet 


a 1521. & 85, de eiſdem 160 l. reſid ei- | 


4 
j 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 447 


dem R. tempore mortis predict W. debit & 

* infolut” fuer, Et idem R. ulterius dic quod 

* ipſe y_ adminiſtravit omnia bona & catalla 

F que faer* predict W. tempore mortis ſue, Et 

© qd ipſe nulla habet bona ſeu catalla que fuer? Nulla bona 
© pred' W. tempore mortis ſue in mambus ſuis Pieter. 

+. adminiſtrand*nec habuit die exhibitionis Bille 


L 
| 
| 


C 1 
! 
* 
# 
5 


— . 2 SORE 37. 


bris Judic' predict” verſus predit' W. V. in vita Foot by 
ecit * ſua ad ſectam J. W. ſuperius placitat idem Fraud. 
ei- I. H. dic qd predict R. P. poſt mortem 

lem nn OO | 


predict T. predict? nec unquam poſtea pre- 

* terquam bona & catalla ad valenc* 721. que 

idem R. retinet in manibus ſuis propr' erga | 

ſatisfactionem ſuam propr' pro predict 1521. 

& 8s. eidem R. per predict W. tempore | 

* mortis ſue ut prefertur debit” & inſolut', Ac 1 

* preterquam al' bona & catalla ad valenc' Cen- 4 

© tum librarum que executionibus ſeperal Judi- 

© ciorum predict” ſuperius placitat* onerat' & 43 
' © obligat' exiſtunt, Et hoc parat' eſt verificare : 
* unde petit Judicium ſi predict' T. H. Actio- 5 
© nem ſuam predict' inde verſus eum habere 1 
t ſeu manutenere debeat, &c. cum hoc quod } 
? idem R. verificare vult quod predict W. V. ; 
s © in dicta Billa predict T. ſuperius inteſtat no- 1 
j- * minar' & predi&' W. I. in Recordis ſepera- | 
2 £ lium Judiciorum predict' ſuperius placitat' 
f- 5 inteſtar' & nominat' fuer” una & eadem per- | 
t ©fona & non alia neque diverſa, quodque idem i 
ze R. P. in iſto placito Adminiſtrator” nomi- ! 
ie nat' & predi&t' R. P. in duobus Jadiciis ul- 4 
nc | © timo placitat' Adminiſtrator” nominat' ſunt : 
in una & eadem perſona & non alia neque di- | 
"er + verſa, &c. I 
illo Et predict' T. H. dic' quod ipſe per aliqua, Rep! as to 3 
no © Per predict” R. P. ſuperius placitando alle. one Jadg- © 
ol- © pat” ab actione ſua predict' inde verſus eund' — dry F 
flet R. habend' precludi non debet quia quoad nd —— 2 [ 


= 

1 

3 

» 

uk 
- 
9 


: 
| 
. 


Bar in Debt per 


predict W. X. ac poſt adminiſtrationem bo- 


c 
c 
« 
c 

« 

o 
4 
c 
= 
. 
o 
c 
4 

c 
c 

o 
o 

o 
„ 

— 
* 

c 
o 
c 
* 
« 


c 
e 
= 
c 
Cc 

0 c 

As to ano- 

ther, that Sa- © 

tisfaQtion was £ 


acknowledg- c 
ed on Re- 


norum & catallorum predict eidem R. com- 
miſſam ſcilt' viceſimo die Octobris Anno Reg- 
ni dicti Domini Regis nung viceſimo apud 
Berrington predict in Com' predict' ſolvit 
prefat J. W. duodecim libr & decem ſolid? 
in plene ſatisſactione & exoneratione debiti & 
dampnorum predict per predict J. W. verſus 
prefat W. ſic ut perfertur recuperat' ac Ju- 
dicii predict pro eiſdem fic ut prefertur ha- 
bir” & obtent', quos quidem duodecim libr' 
& decem ſolid predict J. W. de prefat R. P. 
in plena ſatisfactione & exoneratione debiti 
& dampnorum predict' per ipſum Johan- 
nem W. fic ut prefertur recuperat' & Judicli 
predict' pro eiſdem ut preſertur habit & ob- 
tent? de eodem R. adtunc & ibm' habuit & 
recepit, Et lepius poſtea parat” ſuit & obtu- 
lit ad relaxand prefat R. de debito & damp- 
nis predict vel ad cognoſcend' ſatisfactionem 
earundem in predict' Cur' dicti Domini Re- 
gis de Banco predict ad onera predict' R. ſed 
predict R. deceptive & ea intentione ad ip- 
ſum T. H. de vero & juſto de debito ſuo 


predictꝰ defraudand' & decipiend' procurare 


cognitionem ſatisſactionis intrari de debito 


& dampnis predict' per predict' J. W. verſus 
ipſum R. ut prefertur recuperat' ſeu inde re- 


laxari hucuſque diſtulit & adhuc differt, & 
predi&t' Judicium inde in ſuis robore & vi- 
gore permanere adhuc permittit ad inten- 
tionem predict', Et hoc parat' eſt verificare, 


Ec quoad predi&' Judicium per predict T. C. 


verſus predict W. V. in vita ſua ut prefertur 
obtent', idem T. H. proteſtando quod Judi- 
cium illud fuit indebite obtent' & non pro 


cd l aliquo vero {eu juſto debito pro placito idem 
T. H. dic' qꝗd' predict T. C. duodecimo 
die 


| Executors & Adminiſtrators. 443 
die Febr' Anno Regni dicti Domini Regis 
| * nunc viceſimo primo ven in predict Cur 
| © dicti Domini Regis de Banco predict' per 
KR. E. tunc Attorn' ſuum per ſpeciale war- 
* rant? ſibi in ea parte conſtitut', Et cognovie 
© qd ſatisfactum ſuit ei de debito & dampnis 
predict per predict T. C. verſus prefat 
© W.Y. ut pretertur recuperat' prout in eadem 
* Cur” fatis conſt at de Recordo, Et hoc ſimilit' 
© parat' eſt verificare, &c. Et idem T. H. ul- And that 
© terius dic qd' predict R. die exhibitionis the Defen- 
© predict” Bille ipſius T. H. ſcilt die Mercur' dant has A- 


© prox? poſt quinden Paſche Anno Regni 8 
* dicti Domini Regis nunc veciſimo habuit and (he Bebe 
© diverſa bona & catalla que fuer” predict' due to hin 
© W.Y. tempore martis ſue in manibus ſuis ſelf. 
© adminiſtrand” ad valenc' debiti ipſius T. pred? 

© ultra bona & catalla ſufficien' ad ſatisfaciend' 

© prefat' M. J. & J. O. de ſeperalibus debitis 

& dampnis predic” per ipſos verſus prefat 

KR. ſic ut prefertur recuperat' & ultra bona 

© & catalla ſufficien' ad fatisfaciend' prefat R. 

* de predict 1521, & 8s. de'propr' debico ip. 

© ſius R. predictꝰ ut prefertur debit unde ei- 

dem T. H. de debito ſuo predict' fatisfeciile 

potuit videlt' apud Berrington predict' in 

* Cony predict', Et hoc petit quod inquirat 

per Patriam, &c. „ ee 14.2 wi 


Defendant demurr'd generally to this Re- 
lication. And upon this Demurrer, the De- 
fendantt Council, Mr. Saunders, argued ſeve- 
ral Times that the Replication was inſufficient, 
and made ſeveral Exceptions thereto : As, 


1. That the Replication was double; for that Exception, 
the Plaintiff had avoided Two Judgments, feilt“, that the Rep! 
the Judgment of Word per Fraudem, and the was double. 
Judgment of Clevely by Satisfaction, enter; 

; on 


SS 


— = — 
— < — 
— — , 


—— r —— nng — — 
_ moo gee, .4 4m 3 
— ——— ee es 


— n 
Sn 4 


444 


That the 
Plainritf 
would try 
Matrer of 
Record per 


Pats. 


Bar in Debt per 


on Record, which are Two diſtinct Matters; 


and the Defendant's Plea being an intire Plea, 
if it be avoided in any material Part, it is 
avoided to all Intents, and the Plaintiff ſhall 
have one general Judgment de bonis Teſt atoris, 
And ſuppoſe that upon Two Iſſues join'd it 
ſhall appear that Satisfaction was acknowledg- 
ed upon the Judgment of Clevehy, and that 
the Judgment of Wood was not ſatisfied, nor 
kept on Foot by Fraud, and ſo the one Iſſue 
jor the Plaintiff, and the other for the Defen- 
dant, the Plaintiff ſhall have Judgment upon 
the Iſſue which is found for him, although the 


other be againſt him; and therefore he ought 


not to tender Two Iffues as here he had done, 
when as one of them was ſufficient to main- 
tain his Action. Sed nom all»catur, for the Court 
thought the Replication ſingle enough; but if 
it Was double, yet that the Defendant had loſt 
the Benefit thereof by his general Demurrer. 
2. He ſaid that the Plaintiff had replied, 


That Satisfaction is acknowledg'd on Record 
upon Cleveh's Judgment, and concluded his 


Replication to the Country, ſo the Plaintiff 
would have this Matter of Record tried by the 
Country, whereas it ought to be tried by the 


Record it ſelf, and the Delendant ought to 


have Liberty torejoin to it, that there is no ſuch 
Record, of which he is now forecloſed by the 
ſaid Concluſion to the Country. Sed non allo- 
catur, for that the Judgment of Wood being kept 
en Foot by Fraud, and the Satisfaction of the 
Judgment of Clevely, and the Aſſets over the 
other Two Judgments, and the Defendant's 
own Debt, are ſeveral and diſtinct Replica- 
tions, and the Plaintiff might have rejoin'd to 
them ſeverally, but he had now demurr'd to 
them, and ſo loſt the Advantage. 


Zo He 


EE A. OE. rs 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 445 


3. He objected, That the Plaintiff had made Thar the 


here only one Replication, which comprehend- Plaintiff had 
ed in it ſelf Three diſtin Matters; and by made but 


his concluding to the Country he had exclu. One Replia- 


tion inſtead 
ded the Defendant to plead any Plea, or to take of Three. 


any Iſſue upon the ſpecial Matter ſhewn by 
the Plaintiff in his Replication; and that it 
was but one Replication, he ſaid, appear'd by 
the Commencement and Concluſion thereof, 
for he begins Precludi non, ec. generally; and 
if he would have intended ſeveral Replications, 
he ought to have commenced every of them 
with a [| Quoad ) before the Words | Precludi 
non, Cc. and concluded them ſeverally with 
Hoc paratus eſt werificare, Unde petit Fudicium & 
debitum ſuum predict unacum dampnis ſuis occaſione 
detention debiti ill ſibi adjudicari, or to the Coun- 
try, as the Matter required; but here is only 
one Commencement, and one Concluſion, 
which being badly concluded, the Replication 
is not good. Sed non allocatur, for the Court 
ſaid that they were Three ſeveral Replications, 
and well enough commenced and concluded. 

4. Then he objected, That if they were ta- That there 
ken to be Three Replications, here was a Diſ- was a Dif- 
continuance, for the Defendant had demurr'd 2 
only to One Replication, for he ſays, Q pla. dant having 
citum predict” ſuperias replicando placitat materia- gemurr'd on- 
que in eodem content” minus ſiſſicien in Lege exi- ly to one Re- 
ſtunt, Cc. and the Plaintiff in his Rejoinder plication. 
in Demurrer ſays, C placitum predict ſuperins 
replicando placitai' materiaque in eodem content bon 
&fſulficien iu Lege exiſtunt, &c. lo all in the 
ſingular Number: And it appears not to which 
Replication the Demurrer and Joinder in De- 
murrer relates; but if they ſhall relate to any of 
the Three Replications, yet nothing is done, 
nor Anſwer given to the other Two, whereby 


all 


446 


That the 
laſt Repli- 
cation was ill 
for conclu- 
ding to the 
Country. 


Argument in 
the like Caſe, 
that the Plea 
was double. 


Bar in Debt per 

all is dffeontinued, being on Demurrer. lv, 
Rep. 65. Middleton vers Cheſman, is, a Cale in 
Point. Sed non allocatur, for the Word | Pla- 
citum] eſt nomen collectivum, and refers to all 
Three Replications. | „ 

5. Then it was moved, That admitting they 
were Three Replications, yet the laſt Repli- 
cation was ill for concluding to the Country ; 
for the Defendant in his Plea had ſaid that he 
had not Aſſets over all the Judgments, and his 
own Debt, but he had not ſaid that he had not 
Aſſets over the Two laſt Judgments, and his 
own Debt; and therefore when the Plaintiff 
affirm'd it in his Replication, he ought to have 
concluded with Hoc paratus eſt werificare, Oc, 
ſo the Defendant might have rejoin'd Q4 non 
habuit ultra, & c. and ſo the Iſſue would be 
join'd : But now no Iſſue can be join'd, fot 
here is only an Affirmative of the Plaintiff, with- 
out any Negative of the Defendant, and yet a 
Concluſion to the Country, which ought not 
to be, for every Iſſue conſiſts upon an Afﬀirma. 
tive and a Negative. Sed non allocatur, for the 
the Court ſaid, That the laſt Replication was 
fuperfluous, and the other Two being ſufficient, 
and the Defendant having demurr'd to theni 
generally, the Plaintiff ſhould have Judgment. 
on them which are material, and the laſt Repli- 
cation is not to the Purpoſe. And ſo they gave 
Judgment for the Plaintiff. Vide 1 Saund. 338. 

Vide 2 Sand. 49. A like Report upon the like 
Pleadings, and ſeveral Traverſes, and then moved 
for the Defendant that the Plea was double, be. 
cauſe when the Plaintiff by his Replication had 
avoided the Judgment of Clifton, he ſhall have a 
general Judgment againſt the Defendant de bonis 
Teftatoris without more. And ſo if he avoid the 
Judgment of od, yet if by the AO 
| o 


Executors & Adminiſtrators. 447 


of atiy of the ſaid Judgments the Plaintiff 

ſhall recover, he ought not to perplex the 

Court with Two Matters; for ſuppoſe that 

Two Iſſues ſhould be join'd upon the Two ſe. Suppoſe Two 
veral Traverſes in the Plaintiff *s Replication, Iſſues upon 
and the one ſhould be found for the Plaintiff, the Two 
and the other for the Defendant, Quære, Whe. Traverſes- 
ther the Judgment ſhould be given for the Plain- 

tiff, or Defendant ? But if Iſſue was join'd 

upon one only, there would be no ſuch In- 
conveniency; and if the Plea of the Defen- 

dant be ill or falſe in Part, it ſhall be wholly 

ſer aſide, and the Plaintiff ſhall have Judgment 

generally as aforeſaid 3 Sed now allocatur, Then 

it was moved for the Defendant, that the Tra- 

verſe of 4bſque hoc q4' predict ſumma 1201, de. 

bit fuit prefat” M. C. tempore Fudic ill obtent', &, 
ought to have been omitted in the Replication, 

and he to have relied upon the Fraud pleaded 

in the Inducement thereof, Sed non allocatur; 

ſor per Cur the Plaintiff had Liberty to traverſe 
the ſpecial Matter, or to rely on the Fraud 

generally at his Election, and either Way is 

good. And Judgment was given for the Plain- 

tiff that his Replication was good. 

dem 5o. It is there noted, That in Eaſter- Judgment 
Term, 18 Car. 2. between Norton and the Lady 2gainſt an 
Harvey, Executrix of Sir fob Harvey, in Banco — 
Regis, it was adjudged, That where the Defen- ene ho 
dant in Bar of an Action of Debt upon Bond one of the 
bad pleaded ſeveral Judgments of great Sums Debtors died 
obtained againſt the Teſtator, and amongſt before the 
others had pleaded one Judgment recover?d Teen, 
againſt the ſaid Teſtator, and one E. H. and 

did not aver that the ſaid E. H. died heſore the 

Teſtator, by which it did not appear that the 

Deſendant was liable to ſuch Judgment, and 


ſo the Plea was inſufficient in that Part: Al- 


though 


. 
7 


448 21. Bar in Debt per A 
though ſhe averr'd that ſhe had Aſſets to a ſmall 
Sum, yet for that Defect the Plea was adjudged 
inſufficient. and ill in the whole. And Judg- 
ment was given againſt che Defendant de bonzs 
Teftatoris generally, and all the Judgmeats 
which were well pleaded ſet aſide ; and that 
this Judgment was afterwards affirm'd in the 
| Exchequer-Chamber. Id. Fr. 
Demurrer, Debt againſt an Executor, who pleads ſeve- 
for that the ral Judgments obtain'd againſt her; and plene 
Proteftando in adm preter bona ad valenc 20 l. &c. Rept, Pro- 
= * teſtaudo, ſhe had Aſſets more than to ſatisfie the 
pugnant to ſaid Judgments. Pro placito, that two of the 
the Matter in Judgments were obtain'd by Fraud, &c. Re- 
the Rejoin= join'd, and Iſſue tendred, and ſpecial De- 
der, Cc. murrer, Eo qd' proteſtat predict” in Rejunttione 
predict repugnans eſt ad materiam in eadem re- 
Jundtione placitat ac extra rejunctione ill omitti 

debuic, & c. 1 Lut. 656, Cc. 1 24] 
One only Upon the Argument it appears, the Cauſe 
Odjection for of Demurrer was waved, and one ſingle Ex- 
not alledging ception was taken by the Plaintiff's Councel, 
1 vir. That the Defendant in her Bar ought to 
had made che have alledged in Fact, that the Teſtator had 
Bond. made the Bond, and that it was not ſufficient, 
which was alledged in the Count upon which 
the Judgment was obtain'd, That the Teſta- 
tor fer ſcriptum ſuum ob!” conceſſit, & c. for that 
is not traverſable, and he could not traverſe, 
that the Debt recovered fuit juſtum & verum 
debitum; but if the making of the Bond had 
For the other been alledged, then he might have pleaded to 


might have jt, that there never was ſuch Bond, and cited 
pleaded Nul 


oer Syd 230. Brown and Purchaſe, 1 Brownl. 49. 


| Saun, 328, Cro. Elix. 462. but it was anſwered 
by the Councel on the other Part, Thar there 
was no Need to alledge in the Plea, that the 
Teltator was bound per ſcriptum obi, and that 

lo 


— —— — —— — 


j—— p ⁵ ꝗ «—f—v—q—q— — CA 


| wo: ale 1 4 | 1 
| Executors & Adminiſti ators. 449 
dit is adjudged, 1 Xe. 808. Ando is Colt's | 
Ent. 149. w 5 is adjudged good upon De- 
murret. Abd Co. Ent. 269. Brown's Ent. 
2d Part 88. and 96. Lib. Placitandi. 149, 157, 
and 179. And the Court was of the like Opi- 
nion: And it was ſaid by the Chief Jüſtice, 
and Juſtice Poweil, That none but the Party, wy, 8 
his Heirs, Executors or Adminiſtrators, oy only plead 
Weld Now eſt fattum , and by Juſtice Powell, voz off fad. 
Thar the Plaintiff may not infiſt upon any 
thing, but only the Fraud: And that the Opi- q 
moi in Green and Wilkock's Cafe had been long | 
xploded ; and there was no need ro plead, || 
That Judgment was pro juſto & vero debito, for 
it thalf be (6' prefumed prime facie: Bur the 
Plaintiff had Leave to difcontinue upon Pay- 
mehr of Coſts. Idem 66. | 
I will not here infilt further with Obſerya- 
tions cencerning Execators and Adminiſtra- 
tors, (this being chiefly to direct to Bars and 
Pleadings relating to them) but do refer you 
to a Book, called, The Law of Executor: and 
Adminiſtrators, &c. wherein you may find 
moſt Things which concern their Duty and 
Office. 1 8 
Note, That by a Statute made Anno 8 & g Where Exe. 
I. 3. ca. 11. for giving Coſts to Defendants ac- cutors, Ge. 
quitted in Suits, &. icjs provided, That nothing 80 n Cut 
therein contained ſhall alter the Laws in being Per ; 
as to Executors and Adminiſtrators, in ſuch 
Caſes where they were not then liable to pay k 
Coſts of Suit. | 1 Ik Plainti | 
And that in all Actions commenced in any or Defendant | 


—— ͤ——ĩñ 2 — — j—iůQYiZ8— — — — ̃ 


— — Pet — 
— 


————— et — : —2 . — 
ed —— 52 . 1 * e 
_ 5 n AD a — — ey ww evans * — 


Court of Record, if the Plaintiff die after an die after an 
interlocutory Judgment, and before a final interlocutory 
Judgment, he ſaid Action ſhall not abate; if Judgment, 


the (aid Action might be originally proſecuted due! Jade: ö 
G g EE by ment. 


= =_ — : _ * 2 9 * we | 8 - 30 0 __ = —— C 2 a * 1 „ P * n 
* * 0 hay P p _— 9 uh \ 7 1 
| n — © * 
- 1 : 9 o C3 ; 
. } 
* 47 mn 2 ' et 
. £3. 


though ſhe averr'd that ſhe had Aſſets to a ſmall 
Sum, yet for that Deſect the Plea was adjudged 
inſufficient, and ill in the whole. And Judg- 
ment was given againſt the Defendant de boni 
Teſtatoris generally, and all the Judgments 
which were well pleaded ſet aſide; and that 
this Judgment was afterwards affirm'd in the 
| Exchequer- Chamber. Id. 51. | 
Demurrer, Debt againſt an Executor, who pleads ſeve- 
for that the ral Judgments obtain'd againſt her; and plene 
Proteſtando in am preter bona ad walenc* 20 l. Cc. Rep!, Pro- 
=> Rejoin- teſtaudo, ſhe had Aſſets more than to ſatisfie the 
pugnant to faid Judgments. Pro placito, that two of the 
che Matter in Judgments were obtain'd by Fraud, &c. Re- 
the Rejoin= join'd, and Iſſue tendred, and ſpecial De- 
der, & c. murrer, Eo qd” proteſtat predict in Rejunct ione 
predid repugnans eſt ad materiam in eadem re- 
junct ione placitat ac extra rej unctione ill omitti 

lebuit, & c. 1 Lut. 656, Cc. 6 Sf 
One only Upon the Argument it appears, the Cauſe 
Objection for of Demurrer was waved, and one ſingle Ex- 
not alledging ception was taken by the Plaintiff's Councel, 
4 {756 rag vi. That the Defendant in her Bar ought to 
had made che have alledged in Fact, that the Teſtator had 
Bond. made the Bond, and that it was not ſufficient, 
which was alledged in the Count upon which 
the Judgment was obtain'd, That the Teſta- 
tor per ſcriptum ſuum ob!” conceſſit, & c. for that 
is not traverſable, and he could not traverſe, 
that the Debt recovered fuit juſtum & verum 
diebitum; but if the making of the Bond had 
For the other been alledged, then he might have pleaded to 
might have je, that there never was ſuch Bond, and cited 
1 Syd 230. Brown and Purchaſe, 1 Brownl, 49. 
MT” i Saun, 328, Cro. Elix. 462. but it was anſwered 
by the Councel on the other Part, That there 
was no Need to alledge in the Plea, that the 


Teſtator was bound per ſcriptum obP, — 
0 


: 
Þ 
* 
' 
: 


— — 


04 ' g | 
Exccutors & Admiiniſttators. 445 
5 it is adjudged, 1 Reb. 808. And ſo is Coles | 
Ent. 149. where it is adjudged. gobd upon De- 1 
marcer. An Co. Ent. 269. Brown's Ent. 4 
2d Patt 88. and 96. Lib. Plactt andi. 149, 157, 
and 179. And the Court was of the like Opi- 
mon: And it was ſaid by the Chief Jüſtice, 
and; Juftice Paweil, That none but the Patty, wy, may 
his Heirs, Executors or Adminiſtrators, 5 only plead 
Weld Non eſt fattum , and by Juſtice Powell, Nen oft fat”. 
That the Plaintiff may not infiſt upon an 
thing, but only the Fraud : And that the Opi- 
moi in Green and Wilcock's Cale had been long | 
*xploded ; and there was no need ro plead, . 
That Judgment was pro juſto & vero debito, for 
it hall be ſo prefumed prima facie: Bur the x 
Plaintiff had Leave to diſcontinue upon Pay- = 
ment of Cofts. Idem 662. | [} 
I will not here inſiſt farther wich Obſerya- i 
tions cencerning Executots and Adminiſtra- 1 
tors, (this being chiefly to direct to Bars and 
Pleadings relating to them) but do refer you | 
to a Book, called, The Law of Executors and | 
Adminiſtrators, &c. wherein you may find þ 
moſt Things which concern their Duty and [ 
| 
| 


Office. 3 5 
Note, That by a Statute made Anno 8 & ꝙ Where Exe. 
| . z. ca. 11. for giving Coſts to Defendants ac- cutors, Ge. 
| quitted in Suits, & c. it is provided, That nothing c. _—— 
. therein contained ſhall alter the Laws in being P Colts 
as to Executors and Adminiſtrators, in ſuch 
) 


Caſes where they were not then liable to pay | 
Coſts of Suit. | | If Plaintiff i 


And that in all Actions commenced in any or Defendant 


f Court of Record, if the Plaintiff die after an die after an 
e interlocutory Judgment, and before a final interlocutory 
„ Judgment, ie ſaid Action ſhall not abate, if Judgment, 

t the (aid Action might be originally proſecuted 21 Jug 
0 | | 


final Judg- 
| by mens. 


G g 


* 
— . ˙ 8 
— = N — — — —— — — 


480 


Judgment 
85 2 
Plaintiff, his 
Executors or 
Adminiſtra- 
tors. 


Bar in Debt, & . 


by his  Exeevtors or Adminiſtrators. And 
it che Defendant die aſter ſuch interlocutory 
Judgment, and before final Judgment, the 
Action ſhall not abate, if ſuch Action might be 
originally proſecuted againſt his Executors or 
Adminiſtrators: And the Exeeutors or Ad- 
miniſtcacors of ſuch Plaintiff, after ſuch inter- 
locutory Judgment, may have a Scire Facias 
againſt the Defendant, if living, or, if dead, 


againſt his Executors or Adminiſtrators, o 


ſhew Cauſe why Damages ſhould not be aſſeſs'd 
and recovered againſt him or them : And if he 
or they do not appear at the Return, and ſhew 
ſufficient Cauſe to arreſt the final Judgment; 
or being return'd, Warned; or upon two 
Writs of Scire Facias, it being return'd, That 
the Defendant bad nothing whereby to be ſum. 
moned, or could not be found; Wiit of En- 
quiry of Damages. ſhall be awarded, which 
being executed and returned, Judgment final 


ſhall be given for the ſaid Plaintiff, his Execu- 


tors or Adminiſtrators. 


Bar in Detinue. 


HE Nature of this A&ion is ſufficiently 

fee forth in the Second Part of Inſtr. 
Clericaltis, Tit' eod', wherein there is alſo ſome 
Precedents concerning Garniſhment and Inter- 
pleader. 

And it is alſo obſerved, That there are more 
Actions in Trover than in Detinue, becauſe in 
Detinue the Defendant may wage his Law, bur 
in Trover he cannot. 

Yet in ſome Caſes, as in Desinue for Wri- 
tings concerning Lands, the Defendant cannot 
wage his Law, Cc. nor againſt an Infant, on 

08 


—— —— ̃ — — 


Bar in Detinuc. 

dee more hereof in Compleat Sollicitor; alfo 
in Compleat Attorney, Tit ęund'. 

| Nite, There is alſo a late Treatiſe concern- 

| ing Trover ahd_. Converſion : . To which 'is 

| added, an Abſtract of the Law of Detinue, with | 

References to ſeveral Precedents and Bars, | 

but none at large. We will. therefore look | 


into afew ſuch Precedents, and refer to others. , 


Debt and Detinue Joined, und When. 


Wr brd, ic may obſerved, That Debt 
and Deciaue may be joined i in one Acti- g 
| on; as, 


Debt upon Account before Augitars and 
Derinde of Goods delivered /alvo cuſtodiend'. 
Raf Ent, 250. 

So Debt for the Farm of Cows demiſed for J 
Tenn, and Detinue of the Cattle. Af. 213. | 

1 Mod, Intr. 149. | 

0 So Debt upon a Mut uatus, and Detinue of | 
| Y Goods delivered /u/vo cuſtodiend'. Placitat. 
s Gen. 251. 

: do Debt upon Account, and Mutuat , and 
Detinue De equa delibat Def 2 pro Quer ſalvo 

cuſtodiend. Bro. Red. 25 * 

| So Debt upon a ſingle Bill, and Detinue 

De io. modiis ſi al Placit. Gen. 262. 8 | 


—_— 
- 
_ - ——— — 


+. og 
0 


. The Bars to theſe are as fillow. | 
F CE. predict“ R. per N. W. Attorn” ger, Non dl. 
ſuunti ven & defend” vim & injur bet nec deti- | 


e quando, &c. Et dic qd' iple non debet nee per Fa- | 
n « Freker W. P. predict 41. nec aliguem denar' trig. 
t C * inde i in forma qua idem W. P. ſuperius vers 

eum narravit, nee detinet preſat W. P. pre- 


i- © did virginti vaccas nec aliquam earundem 
t in forma qua idem W. P. luperius vers eum 
c. c * narcavit, Et de hoc pon ſe ſuper Prigm'; 


6 G g 2 21 


4 


Bar. 


Bar in Detinue. 

t predict W. P. ſuic! lqeo precept' eſt 
* vic', &c. Vide 1 Med. Intr. z05. "Aſt: 25 po 
*fYgOM00 $171,491 1 6} colis ei 2 T * 
Now Dtbet nec Detiner per Legem al Debt 
r Accoitnt deuant Auditor. 
LSU PU HD; IH FIOYDIL a e 
* 88 A ves; &c. Et quoad 

LL ptedict' 4 l. dic“ ꝗd' in Statut apud 


»Weſtm Anno Regni Domini H. nuper 


* Regis Ang! quarti poſt Conqu'm quinto 
* int 12 Sc fun, Qd' Juſtic in Cur 
„Domini Regis & al' Judices coram quibus 
ſecte & Actiones debit' in quibus querehtes 
ſuppon' Def? coram Auditeribus Aſſigif de 
© diverſis' receptiombus debit' & contractibus 
© int” eos habit' computaſſe & in arrerapiis 
ſuper eiſdem Compot᷑ invene” fuiſſe habeant 
poteſtatem exaiand inde Attorn' & As 
* quos eis videbit', Et ſuper hoc ad recipiend 
© Def” ad corum Legem inde ſaciend' vel 
5 triand' per Inquiſitionem Exit ſecufidum 
* diſcretionem, Juſtic* & Judic' predict, Et 
© dic' qU& ipfe non debet prefat C. preſat 4 J. 
nec aliquem denar' inde nec detinet eidem 
Ci. catalla predict' nec aliquam inde*parcely; 
in forma qua idem C. ſuperius vers eum 
© narravit, Et hoc parat? eſt defendere contra 
ipſum & ſectam ſuam : ꝓraut Cur? Regis hic 
© cons”, &c. Et pet qd” predict” Attotn pre- 


- dict' C. de narr' ſua predict examiner”, Et 
Ja ipſe de predict 4 lt. ad Legem ſham 
F faciend' admittat', &c. Secundum formani 

Statut? predick, &c. Et ſuper hoc facta inde 


©. examinat predict” Attorn' predict C. Cons 
© eſt per quſtid hie qd' predict” A. vad preſat 
C. inde necnon de catallis predict Legem 
ſuam de duodecima manu, Pleg' de Lege 
© FT. & G. Et ven' cum Lege ſua hic (XV. 
n 33 * Pas) 


© Pas?) Et dictum eſt preſat Attorn' predict © © 

„A qd' tunc habeat hic eund A. Magiſtrum 

* ſuum in propt' perſona ſua ad petficiend* 

© Legem ſuam predict. Vide Raff. Ent. 150. 
ide Placitat Gen. 373. Non debet nec 
' ©, detinet per Legem a Part. , 
Non debet per Priam al” mutuat', & 

© cogn' Actionem pro Catallis. Id. 257. 
Several Judgments in Debt and Detinue, 

Vide 1 Town|. Fud. 258. Simile, 2 Town. Judg- 


* 


| ments, 87, 88, 89, G. 


Bar in Detinue tautum. 


. predict' Def” per G. C. Attorn' Non detinet 
| pF E, ſuum ven” & defend* vim & injur' per Patriam. 
| * quando, &c. Et dic' qd” ipſe non detinet 
F prefat' & M. catalla predict' nec aliquam 
inde parcel modo & forma prout.iidem M. 
& M. ſuperius verſus eum nartavet, Et de 
hoc pon' ſe ſuper Priam', Et predict 
NM. & M. ili. Ideo precepr' eſt vic, &c. 
© Vide Af, 197. Placit. Gen. 314. 
Et predict' H. B. per G. B. Att' ſyum Non detinet 
( ven' & deſend' vim & injur' quando, & Et per Legem. 
d dic' ꝗd' ipſe non detinet prefat H. L. catalla. 
*. ptedict nec aliquam inde” parcelP in forma 
© qua idem f. L. Aupetius_ verfos eum narrs 
bit, Ex hoc parae. elt deſendere eontra ipſum 
& ſectam ſuam prout Cur Regis hic cons', 
deo cons' eft.gd' predict H. B. vad* ei inde 
( Legem ſuam de dyodecima manu, Kc. Pleg 3 
| de Lege J. Den., & R. Fen. Er ven? cum : 
lege ſua hic in Octab ſer "HIP." Et 
1 {dictum eſt prefat Attorn predieti H. B. 
-* qd tunc habeat hic eund H. B. mm ſuum 
* in -prapr* perſona ſua, ad perficiend' ine. , „ de. in 


Legem ſuam predict, Nin e ee 
: G 8 3 2 a 4 Then Hatun 


_ 2 uiry retorn' a 
de Ra 


3k | NTT nne 
454 har in Detmue. 
Then the Defendant's Attorney comes at the 
"Day, and caſts an Eſſpin de male veniendi, and 
the Defendant makes Default at the Day by 
Eſſoin. | 


Judgment. © Ideo cons? eft qd” predict? H. L. recupe- 


ret vers preſat H. B. catalla predict“ vel 
* valorem eorundem, Et idem H B. in mia', 
© &c. Et precept' eſt Vic qd? diſtring preſat 
© H. B. per omnes terras, &c. Et qQ de Exit“, 
© &c. Ita qd' reddat' prefat' H. L. catalla <q 
© di&?, Et per ſacrum* duolecim, &c: de Bal- 
6 liva ſua diligent inquir' que dampna idem 
H. L. ſuſtinuit, &c. Vide Af. 201. Idem 
200. See 4 Writ of 2 awarded, with the 

| „ and final Tudgment. 


E Vi Ent. 211. x Bro. 355. 


N. W. ha fit ad repondend' R. B. de 


Vetinue. ir : 'e 

_ placits-ga reddat ei catall ad valenc &. 
due ei injuſte detinet, G c. Et unde ea- 

wi o_dw dem A. Oc. | 5 ä 5 . 


FP prediq' N. per —— Attorn' ſuut 
Bar. 4 . + £5 ven: & del G vim & injur' quando, 
— e ps © &c. Et quoad catalla predict“ preter predict 
gem, pet Le c tres rogas (non detinet per legem, &.) Et 
Fm _ © -quaad quas togas illas idem N. dic qd' Adi 
© nem non, &c. Qula dic? qq* ipſe nuper ſcile 
F 10 Die Decembris Anno, &c. in Cpria 
Domini Regis Civit London, coram W. C. 


bone uno Vic? Civitgris N f 
$ quandam querelam verſus prefat A. per no- 


men, &c. de placito ſuper dęemand' trigint 
AI refid' Pre, ſolid per qd' ſecundum cons' Civirar' pre- 
22 hs dict a tempore quo non extat memoria, in 
Sc. in Civa? eadem dſita“ & approbat, predict A. 
London. attach fuir per predict duas togas in vos 
1755 v „ F „ Pp 105 


2 , 
0 


_ — OS 1 OC 


„„ k 


Baur in Detinue- _—_— 
'} © ipſius N. jam defend”, &c. infra Civitat" pre- 
© di tuncexiſten', Et pro eo qd predict A, 
© ad Cur tent die. &c. Anno, &c. in Guihald” 
© Civitat? predict', Ac ad tres Cur? tunc prox 
* ſequen' ibm” tent? coram prefar” Vic, defalt” 
fecit, predict' due toge die, &c. Anno, 
©'&c, apud L. in Paroch', &c. poſt quatyor 

* defalt* ill” record*, ſecundum cons predict“ Toge appre- 
* appreciat' ſuer' ad vigint' & duos folid* per ciat 

© facrum' A. B. & C. D. Civiv' Civitat? pre» 
© dit', Et tunc & ſecundum cons predict 
© deliberat' ſuer eidem N. ad di& pretiu 
© vigint' & duorum ſolid' per pleg J. & J. qyi 
© manuceper” pro eodem N. ad reſpondend” 
«* prefat' M. de eiſdem duabus togis vel pretio 
* earundem, Si eadem A. infra Annum & 
Diem prox' poſt Appretionem pred” venerat, 
n ſecundum cons predict probaverat ipſam 


*T predict trigint* {olid' eidem N. non debere, 
0 | Et hoc. &c. Unde per” Judic' ſi predict' A. 
_ 4 Action', &c. | 


Et predict' A. dic' qd” ipſa precludi non, Rep!, Per 
* Quia dic? qq' non hetur? tale Record” inde __— Re- 
© coram prefat nuper Vic' fact prout predict — 
þ N. ſupetius allegavit, Et quia: Major, Aldri' 
* © & Vic' London omnia Recorda placitorum 
* | 


* coram eis vel eorum aliquo habita, orete- 

nus & non aliter ſeperatim, prout ipſis vel 

* eorum aliquo hab', recordari debent & 

© conſueverynt a tempore quo nan extat me- 

© moria, Io' precept” eſt preſat W. nuper 

un' Vic, coram quo ſuperius allegat' eſt pr a certifier 
© recordum illud fieri & haberi, qd” ſcir' fac? le Record' ore 
© hic a die, &c. utrum tale coram eo habea- tenus. 
tur recordu? necne, Et idem dies dat' eſt | 

* partibus predictis hic, &c. Ad quem diem Atjas ſur non 
* hic ven partes, &c, Et predic W. non mis breve. 

© miſic breve, Io ſicut prius fiat ei inde breve 


G 4 in 


Bar Ther the. Plaintiff delivered it in 

AT Coune de , 4H Fe," FLarmtaff del eee of 212 

Plate. Pama for 10 l. to J. who died Inteſtate, 
aud Adminiſtration was coumitted to the. 
Defendant, and the Plaintiff had not 
paidthe 10 I. ä 5 


1126 7 TT predict H. per G. Attorn ſuum 

Leven, &c. Et dic' qd' predict 5 B. 

actionem non, &c. Quia dic qd” dem 

J. B. predict viceſimg die Jurji apud A. 

* predict, mwnar' ſuiſſet de prefat J. A. de- 

cem ſibr' eidem J. A. cum inde, requiſit” 

« fuiſſer ſolvend', Et pro ſecutitate ſoluconis 

* earundem decem librarum idem J. B. adtunc 

* & ibm' deliberavit eidem J. A. predict Cra- 

* reras Argenti ad ea ſibi cuſtodiend' & reti- 

* nuend' quouſq: idem J. B. ſolveret eidem 

1 J. A. predict decem libr' virtute cujus libe- 

* ca'conis idem J. A. de ctateris, &c. ſuit 

$ -+ , -» ©-poſſeflionat', ' Et fic inde paſſtffionat' abiic 

D inteſtat', 'poſt'epjus dell pro eo qd' idem 

© F. A. tempore mortis ſue ſuĩt poſſeſſionat' de 

* divers? bonis & catallis in divers Dioces infra 

1 * regnly Dui' Regis Ang! Reverendiſlimus” in 

© + Npo? Pater T. Epus Cantnat* ſequeſtravit 

| omnia bona & catalla que fuer” predict J. A, 

1 tempore mortis ſue, Et poſtea ſcilt ſexto die 

* Novembris' Anno, &. idem Epus' per L'ras 

* ſuas Adminiſtrator” apud A. in Com' predict 

. ; © cominifit eidem H. adminiſtrationem bono. 

4-1 rum & catallorum que fuer? predict” J. A. 

tempore mortis ſue,” virtute cyjus idem H. 

N predict crateras, &c. ut bona & catalla que 

7 | * fuer” predict' J. A. tempore mortis ſue apud 

A. predict cepit & inde fuit & adhuc 4 
| | « 

| Por 


Bar in Detinu . 487 


poſſeſſionat', 1 7 predict J. B. predict de- le 


. cem libr prefar” A: in vita ſua, nec e idem 


* Fg mortem ejuſdem J. A. nondum ſolvit, 
Ahſqʒ hoc qd” predict J. B. deliberavit cra- 
© teras, &c. prefat J. A; ad eas ſalvo cuſtodi- 
* end", & eidem J. B. cum inde requiſie* ſuiſſet, . „ver, Deli. 
* redeliberand', in ſaorma qua idem J. B per ery prout 
narr' ſuam predictam ſuperius ſuppon', in nar. 
Et hoc paratus eſt verificare, Unde petit 
© Jadiciu' fi Actio', &c. 4 
Et predict J. B. dic? qd' ipſe deliberavit 
<©prefat” J. A. crateras, &c. ad eas ſalvo cuſto- Rep! & Iſſue 
* diend* & eidem J. B. cum inde requiſit' ſur ceo, 
© tuiffets redeliberand' in forma qua idem J. B. 
per narr? ſuam predict' ſuperius ſuppon', Et 
* hoc petit qd” inquiratur per Priam', Et pre- 
© di” H. ſiliter lo, &c. Raft. Ent. 212. 4. 


< Ee predict T. die Action non, cc. Superemiſſe, 
« Quia dic' ꝗd' predict' W. Die & Anno ſu- in Detenti- 
c pradictis apud N. predi&” requiſivit ipſum T. Ne g 


- 3 ; | - Def” pled 
ad predictas viginti oves eidem W. quinto die = oy 


dem viginti oves idem T. prefat' W. eodem ad delibe- 


« quinto die Maii apud N. predict' optulit' rand eo ge. 
quas quidem vigint” oves de eodem J. reci 7 


1 ture. 


pere predict W. adtunc & ibm penitus re- 
« Cufavit, Et idem T. ulterius dic? qd' ipſe 
ſemper a predito quinto die Maii parat” fuit 
& exiſtit ad deliberand' prefat W. predictas 
vigint' oves, que quidam vigint' oves predict 

ſere nature ſunt & hic in Cur' convenient? 
fſugari non poſſunt, Et ideo pet diem ad 
* oves predictas predicto W. deliberand', Et 
* hoc parat' eſt verificare, Unde petit judiciu 


© fi predict W. aliqua dampna ea occo'ne ha- 
bere debeat, &c. lo cons q* predict W. 


* habeat deliberationem predictarum oviu', 
Et predict T. in mia?, &c. Et Mis”. 


. e ore priſt 
Mai tunc prox ſequen' deſiberand' quas qui- & petit diem 


* 


488 - Bar in Detinue. 
Quer Repli- Et predict“ W. de dampnis ſuis occ' one 
car? q@ Def © derentionis oviu” predictarum hend' dic qd' 
— de- c ipſe predicto quinto die Maii & ſepius poſt 
2 © eundem quintu' diem M. apud N. predict 
© 'requiſivit predic T. ad deliberand' eidem 
© W. predictas vigint' oves & predict T. oves 


© jllas eidem W. deliberare omnino recuſavit. 


© Abſq; hoc qd' predict T. obtulit eidem W. 
F eaſdem vigint' oves modo & forma prout 
< predict T. ſuperius allegavit, Et hoc patat 


© eſt verificare, Unde petit judiciuꝰ & dampna 


| © ſua, &c. | 
Def* teſon- Et predict' T. ut privs dic? qd' ipſe obru- 
git, ut prius © lit eidem W. predictas vigint' oves prout 
ge obculic. © jpſe ſupetius placitando allegavit, Et de hoc 
E por? ſe ſuper Priam', Et predi& W. ſiliter', 
© &c. lo, &c. Vide 1 Brown's Ent. Ec vide 
© 3 Iftr. Cl. 130. 
© Vide Raft. Ent. 218, Confeflion' qd' Ciſta 
© ita ponderola qd” cariari non poteſt, Ee 
| c touts temps priſt, &c. 
Bar, inDeten= © Actio non, Quia dic' qd” poſt barganiam 
tione cacallo- © & enditionem predictorum triginta quarte- 


rum ſuper ( ,; : gen 
ab Uf: fiorum ſabarum in forma predict fiel ĩ ſup- 


die d poſu' & ante aliquem diem deliberationis 


Quer* poſt eorundem ({cilt ral? Die & Anno) predict 
barganiam G apud B. predid' precepit & inſtanter re- 


precepir ei ad © quiſiwit ipſum S. ad vendend' predicta tri. 
vendend' illa, ( 


&c. 


gint' quarteria ſabarum cuicunq; pei ſone five 
© quibuſcung; perſonis ea emere volentibus me- 
© hori precio quo potuit ad optimum pro- 
© ficuu' & advantagiu' ipſius G. & pecunias 
© Was inde provenien' eidem G. ſolvere & ſatiſ- 
© facere, cujus precepti pietextu idem S. poſtea 
çſciltè tal' Die & Anno apud B. predict ven- 
didit eadem triꝑint' quarteria fabarumcuidam 
J. S. pro ſex ſolidꝰ & octo denar' pro quolibet 
quarterio quas quidem pecunias inde prove- 
nien 


9 
fey ws 


— * _ — — 


| Bar in De tinue. 459 

„ hier idem 8. poſtea fcile' ral? Die & Anno | 

apud B predict obtulit prefar' G. parat' ad 
F —_ 
ſolvend', quas quidem pecuniag idem G. de 
©'codem S. recipere adtunc & ibm' penitus 
$ 'reculavit, Er hoc, &c. Unde, &c. 1 
Et predict G. precludi non quia dic* qd” Replieation' 
© ipſe non precepit nec inſtanter requiſwit Quer non 
predictu S. ad vendend* predicta triginta Precepit. = 
* quarteria ſaharum in forma qua idem S. ſupe. 
* rius allegavit, Et hoc petit q& inquiratur 
© per Priam', Et predict S. fiiiter?, &c. Vide 
* 1 Bro. 149. 
Actio' non, Quia dic' ꝗd' predia* H. Die Bar, in deten- 
5 &=Anno ſupradictis apud D. predict' deli. "tone equi qd 
f beravit eidem C. equum predi&” ad ipſum Jie — 
F ponend* in paſtura ipſius C. in D. predict 84 
ad periculuꝰ predicti H ibm' herbam creſcen ſturand ſub 
* deſpacend', per quod idem C. equum pre. ſuo periculo. 
dictu' in paſtura ſua predict poſuit, Abſq; hoc Abſq; boc qd 
* qq' predict H. deliberavic equum predictu — 
* eidem C. ſalvo cuſtodiend' & eidem H. cum end, &. 
* inde requiſit* fuiſſec redeliberand* prout, &c. = 
Et hoc, &c. Unde, &c. 

Et predict' H. precludi non, Quia dic' qd? Replication', 
jpſe deliberavit prefat? C. equum predict: 9d quer de- 
$ ſalvo cuſtodiend & eidem H. cum inde re- Mbetavit 
© quiſit' fuiſſer redeliberand” prout ipſe ſuperius — N 
F allegavit, Et hoc petit qq* inquiratur per &c. & Iſſue 
© Priam?, Et predict C. ſiliter, &c. Vide. ſur ceo. 
© 1 Bro. 149 x 4 | 

© Er predict? R. per — Attorn' ſuum ven' p,, 1. 
* & defend vim & injus quando, &cx. Et fe — 2 
* dic? qq predict W. Actionem ſuam ptedict' Waite per 
 * verſus eum habere non debet, Quia dic' qd' D de 
quidam W. D. & W. C. ſunt & a predicto Manor. 
7 die Nov” in narr' predict“ W. ſuperius 
© ſpe & diti ante fuerunt ſeiſiti de manerio 
* de C-als A. cum ꝑertin in Com' predicto 

Ez, 5 in 


preſeii on'. 
view de c 
Fran  pleg®. c 


Replication' 
proteſtando. 


Bar in Detinue. 


ia Dominico ſuo ut de ſeodo iidema; W. & W. 
© & omnes II? quorum Statum idem W. X. W. 

madomhahegt & - predicts. 7 die Nov ha- 
1 buer' in Manerie predicto a tempore cujus 
© contrar 4nemoria ! hominym non exiſtit ha- 
buet! & habere conſuever Vie Franc pleg 
in Villa de A. ptedict & omnia alia que ad 
© vidum Franc' pleg pertinent in A. predict 
nac bona & catalla waviat! & Fin... infra 
5 predict pete — — R. ulterius djc* 


ova 


„ 4 05 ua by & poſtea 
“ ſcilt' . 7 dig Nov Anno ſupradicto 
© predictus homo ignotus bona & — illa 
— cy A. predict infra Manueriuꝰ predictu 
* reliquit & waviavit, per qugd idem R. ut 4 
© livus: predictorum W. & W. Manerii ſul eo. 
: dem 7.,die, Nor' apud A; predict' catalla 

* predicta in forma predict waviat ad uſum 

ptedictorum W. & W. cepit & ſeiſſvit ac 
; — . catalla ad lum eorum W. & W. 

adhuc detinet prout ei bene licuit, Et doc, 
- Sc. Ude, & c. 

Ptecludi non, Quia proteſtando dd pre- 
dict W. & W. predidto 7 die Nov non 
© ſuerunt ſeiſiti de Manerio predicto cum per- 
tin in Dominico ſuo ut de wes proteſtando 
etiam qdꝰ predict' W. & W. ac omnes illi 
gquorum ſtatum iidem W. &. W. modo ha- 
bent & predicto 7 die Nov' habuer, in 
* Manerio predicto cum pertinen a tempore 
* cuyus contrarii memoria hominum non exi- 
* ſtit non habuer' nec habere conſuever Vic 
© Franc' pleg in predict Villa de A. ac ani 

alia 


"Broad, Cloth, colore French Tat 


Bar in Detinue. 461 


alia que ad viſum Franc' pleg pertinent nec 


Manerium predictu' prout predict R. ſupe- pur plea, q. 1! 


ius allegavit, pro placito dic' gd}; quidam fe'on' fuir 


J A. predicto 6 die Nov. Anno, &. ſu- priſe fur 


4 pradicto ut felo dict Dom' Regiu nunc noe perfect 


apud A. predicti” bona & catalla predict 23 
extra poſſeſſionem ipſius W. ili fel onice furat' per le Pit” & 


i ſuig, poſt modumq; ſeilt predicto 7 die trove culpa- 
Nov Anno ſupradicto predict A. ad recen; ble per que 


de m mſecu'conem iplius W. capt' fuit & reſtitution 


poſtea ad Seſſionem Pacis Domine Regin econ 


tent apud G. in Com' predict die Martis, 
vide. 12 die lan Anno, &C 21. coram 


LH. Domino C. & al Juſticiar dict Domine 
Regin' ad pacem necnon ad divers; felonias 


tranſgteſſionis & al malefacta in Com pre- 
dict perpetrataiagdiend” & terminand' aſſignꝰ, 
predictus J. per nomen J. A. de, &. in 
Com predict Indictatus fuit de felonia pre · 
dict videltꝰ de eo q& iple predicto 6 die Nov 
Anno, &c. ſupradicto apud A. predict' vi 
&.,jarmis 20. Virgas panni lanei, vocat' 
ume, Et alia 


bona. ad valend, &c.. de bonis &i catallis 


ipſius W. H. adtung & ibm' invent ſelonice 
cepit & aſportayit contra pacem dict Domi. . 
ne, Regin nunc. Coronam & Dignitat' ſuas, 1 7 

Kc. Super. quo predictus J. A, ad eandem 
Selſionem 'pagis,: coram.. Jalticianis predictis 
per ic; Com! predicti ibm ad batram 
ductus, & allocatus qualiter ſe vellet de ſelo- 
nia predicta acquietari dixit, qd” ipſe in 


nullo fuit culpabilis de premiſſis ei per In- 
F ditamentu' predictuꝰ in forma predict im- 


poſitis & inde de bono & malo poluit ſe ſuper 


F patriam. Ob quod adtunc & ibm conſide- 


ratu* fuit per pretat' Juſticiar' dict Dom' 
| * Regin 


- 
. 
— Z nm, nd — 


Travers le 
waivier des 
Biens. 


Iſſue ſur le 


Travers. 


Bar in Detinue. 
© Repin' qq” fieret inde Jur', &c. Super qt 
© Juratores inde impannellati - adtunc & ibi 
© exacti vener qui ad veritat” de premiſſis d 
dend electi & rtriat' dixerunt ſuper Sacr 
© mentu* ſuum qd* predictus J. A. fuit culp 
© bilis de felonia predicta. Et idem W. ult 


_ © rius die qQ? predict J. A. per Jurator 


© preditos comperrus fut culpabilis de felon 
* prediqta ra'cone evidencie per ipſum \ 
© verſus prefac' I. adtunc & ibm' dat? per quo 
© per quoddam breve Domine Regin* e Ci 
* ipfius Domine Regin coram prefac' Juſtici 
* riis Domine Regin' tunc emanans 'prece} 
© fuic Ballivo Manerit predict qd” 1e 

© catalla predict eidem W. H. reſtitueret 

* deliberaret ſine dilacꝰ one periculo incur 
* bend', Et idem W. H. ulterius dic' qd' bo 
* & catalla predicta in Inditamento predie 
* ſuperius ſpec? ac predicta catalla ipſius \ 
* fuperias ſpec” ſunt percell” bonorum & e 
© tallorum predictorumi in Indictamento pi 
* dito ſupetius ſpec': Acetiam qd” predi 


J. A. in Indickamento predicto ſuperius ſpe 


Et predict homo ignotus in barra predi 
KR. ſaperius ſpecificat' ſunt una & eadem p 
ſona & non alia neq; diverſa Abſq; hoc « 
predict homo ignotus predicta bona & cata 
infra Maneriv' ptedict' reliquit & waivia 
prout predict R. ſupet ius allegavit, Et h 
© paratus eſt verificare unde petit judiciu' 
* catalla predi4” unacum dampnis ſuis oc 
eorundem ſibi adjudicari, &c N 

Et predict R. ut prius dic? qc predi& hon 
© iphotus predia? bona & catalla infra Man 
© riu_ predictu' reliquet & Waiviavit prout If 
* ſuperius allegavit, Er de hoc pon' fe ſuf 
« Priam', Et predict“ W. H. ſiliter', &c. Vi 

Af. 205, 206. 


c 


x 


Bar in Detinue. 463 
See 3 1n#r. Cl. laſt pub. 340. Where the De- Bar, per pri- 


er quo 
er Indant pleads in Bar, That he took the Mare -l come 
fis di- an Eſtray, and made Proclamation thereof, Eftray. 
Sacra · ¶ d put her to Paſture; and becauſe the Plain- 
culpa- Hf would not pay the Defendant for Paſture, 
V. ulte. WE detain'd her, quoſque evafit, ce. Reps, By 
.ratores Nender of 135. 4 % Rejo', proteſt qd' non fuer 
felonia Wb ſicien emend pro placito non obtulit & Iue. 
um W. bee the like, Co. Ent. 169. and 3 Rrownl. 
r quod z, Ce. | | | 
Cut! ee allo, 3 If. Cler. Tir” Bar in Trover. 
Jufticia- WF . 

recept Detinue per Exec. 

na & 


veret & T predict R. F. per Attorn' ſuum ven's Bar. 


incum- (&c.) Quando, (&c.) Et proteſtando 

qd' bon: qd prędict' T. K. non ſecꝰ aliquod Tefta- 

predict mentum, proteſtando etiam qd” non conſtituit 

ofins W. predict A. Executorem Teſtamenti ſui prout 

m & ei idem A. G. in narr' ſua predicta fuperius 

nto pte ſuppon? pro placito dic qd predic A. 

pre dic actionem ſuam predictam verſus eum habere Thar Admi. 
ius ſpec non debet quia dic qd” bene & verum eſt aiſtration was 
a prediafiy ad predict” T. N. in vita ſua, predi& 27 — to 
dem peſ die Dec Anno ſecundo ſupradicto apud S. ne eng. oP 


ia Com' predict' poſſeſſionat' fuit de bonis p1,;..:- 
& catal & catallis predict' ut de bonis & catallis — 
watvia fuis propriis, Et ſic inde poſſeſſionat' eif. fold the 
+ Et ho dem die & Anno apud S. in Com' predict? Goods to the 
„ x obiie, Et idem R. T. dic' qd' poſt mortem Defendant. 
is oc predict T. K. adminiſtraco* omnium bono- 
tum & catallorum que fuer' ejuſdem T. K. 
dic hom tempore mortis ſue per J. D. Commiſſariu' 
fra Mane Reverend? in Chriſto patris T. B Coven' & 

prout pe Lichf' Epi” apud L. in Com' Civit' L. cui- 
' fe ſupeſf dam T. K. filio predict' T. K teitatoris, 

Kc. Vid cc. 15 die Jan' Anno ſecundo commiſſa 
Ait, virtute cujus quidem Adminiſtrationis 
68e idem 


b 
4 
1 
4 


27 
* 
4 
mT 
+ 
. 
2 
95 
8 
* 
* 
. 


A p 


- 
e 


464 Bar in Detinue. 


idem T. C. filius fuit de bonis & catallis pre. 

© dictis poſſeſſionat', Er lie inde poſleffionat' 
© © poſtea & ante diem probationis 'Teſtatnentif 
predicts T. K. teſtatoris per predict A. 
fact', ſcilt' 27 die Jar? Arino ſecundo ſupta- ] 
dicto predict T. K. filius apud S. in Com 
predict” vendidit bona & catalla prediet” in 
narr' predict' fpec* eidem R. F. pro certbfi 
pecunie ſumma inter eos adrunc concordat 
& prefat' T. K. filio per iplum R. F. prema 
nibus tunc ſolut', cujus quidem venditioni 
* pretextu idem R. F. eadem bona & catalla ia 
© manus ſuas cepit & fuir & adhuc eſt de eildemfi 
© bonis & catallis poſſeſſionat', Et hoc paratuſ 
eſt verificare, Unde petit judiciu' ſi prediaÞ 
* A. Adction' ſuam predict vers eum haberf 
5 debeat; &c. | . | 

To this, Plaintiff demurs, and Defendant 
joins, and the Plea adjudged inſufficient pet 
Cur', Vide Aſt. Ent. 198, Cc. | 


Bar deCartis. 


Semper parat . Uando, &c. Et dic” ꝗd' ipſe ſempe 

ad 1 8 - parat' fuic & adbuc paàtat' exiſtit ad 

er * delibe:and* preſat Quer Cartam predict 

cepit. Et ill' eidem Quer parat' deliberand' hic ii 
* Cur' profere, ſuper quo idem Quer' Cartai 
predict' de prefatꝰ Det? hic in Cur” recepit 
* Ideo-cons' eſt qa” idem Def de Carta il 
« fit quiet', & c. Et nichil de mia? in ipſum Del 
© qui ven' per ſuum, &c. primo die, & 
* Vide: Tbompſ. Ent. 428. Clerk's A. 1! 
Han. 120. 


K HW 0 @# at a 


Para 


Bar in Detinue. 465 oY | 


— rundum Condition”, and prays Gar- 1 
entifl - niſhment. | 1 
Ando, &c. Et proſerend' ſcriptum 
Pla-. predict hic in Cur' parat' ad delibe- 

om 


| © rand” cui vel quibus Cur' Domini Regis hic 
t uf con-, dic! qd' ſcript? ill' 10 die M. Anno, 
en « Kc. fupradicto apud E. predi& prefat' Def? 
deliberat' fuit tam per predict' quer quam 
mae per predict T. B. unanimi eorum aſſenſu & 
wi conſens' equa manu ſub certis Conditionibus 
Na in cuſtodiend & eidem quer aut predict T. B. 
lub Condition” redeliberand', Sed utrum 
at Condition ilP ex parte predict T. B. adim- 
| © pletur necne dic! qd' ipſe omnio ignorat, Et 
pet' qd' idem T. B. inde premuniat', &c. : | 
idem Thomp,” Ent: 428, "ys ** ö 
Aliter upon Detinue of a Bond, and De- i 
ſendant prays. Garniſhment, and Judgment | 
againſt the Garniſhee by Default. Vide 2d | bi 
Part Inſtr. Cl. Tir Detinue. | | 
. Judgment aliter when the Garniſhee ap- 
pears. Idem. | 
. Aliter, & interplacitatio upon two Bonds, 
ſur 2 Narrs, Ibid. | 
See more of Interpleader de Cartis, Rob. Ent. 
226. 1 Bro. 147. Placit, Gen. 375. 


ecepit Count Per J. T. pro ſcript” Obi ei fat 2 
i libeat Def ſolvend quer cum inde re- 
n De qui ſit', Ec. 
LI predi& (Def') per H. R. Attorn' 
et E. 1 ven 2 Garn vim & injur? 
* quando, &c. Et petunt licentiam ad billam | i 
pꝑiuedictand' interloquend' &c. Et eis conce- Inperlance. ; 
* dirur, &c. Et ſuper hoc dies inde dat' eſt | 


6 a 2 5 o w 
4. Partibus predictis coram Domino Rege apud 
"I Hh © Weltm 


empet 
(tir at 
edit 


466 


Bar. Od 


Poblon 
fuit deliver 


al Def ſur 


Conditions. 


Le Def' prie 
qd' le pl' & 
Tauter party 
interplede- 
rone. 


Sire facias. 


Garniſhee 
appear. 


© Weſtm' uſq; diem Veneris prox poſt Cr 


Bar in Detinue. 


ſce Trinitat', &c. videlt' prefat' (Def?) ad 
© billam. predict” interloquend' & tunc adi 
* reſpondend?, &c. Ad quem diem coram Do] 
mino Rege apud Weſtm' ven tam pred? J. THE 

quam predict (Def) per Attorn' ſuos pre 
* dictos, Et iidem (Def) defend' vim & ol 
© jur” quando, &c. Et proferend' hic in Cui. 
© Scriptum predictu' parat' ad deliberand' cif 
© vel quibus Curia hic conſider, dicunt qa 
* Scriptum illud Die & Anno ſupradictis apa. 
© C. H. predict' in Com' predict tam perf 
© predit' Io' quam per prefat? H. liberatun 
; 15 eiſdem (Def?) equa, manu ſub certiſ 
* Conditionibus cuſtodiend* & eidem J. ſei 
© prefat' H. ſub Conditionibus illis redeliberand 
© ſet utrum Conditiones ille ex parte predid 
H. implete ſunt necne, dicunt qd? ipſe omni 
© no ignorant, & petunt qd idem H. premuſ 
© niatur, &c. per ꝗd' preceptu' eſt Vic' Soni 
© qq per bonos, &c. Scire fac' prefat* HI 
* qd fit coram Domino Rege apud' Weſtnfl 
© die Lune prox” poſt' Octab' ſciꝰ Michis? af 
© oftend' fi quid pro ſe habeat vel dicere ſeia 
© quare predictu' (criptum obligatoriu' prefat 
J. liberari non debeat fi &c. Et ulterius, &c 
© Idem dies dat eſt prefat' J. & (Def') &c 
© Et modo ad hunc diem ſcilt” predict' dien 
© Lune prox” poſt octab' ſci! Michis* coram 
Domino Rege apud Weſtm' ven' tam pre: 
dict' J. quam predict' Def' per Attorn' ſuc 
© predictos, Et Vic videlt J. C. Ar' retorn 
gqd' ipſe virtute brevis predict' ſibi inde dire& 
* per J. C. & T. P. probos & legles' hoies' d: 
© ballia* ſua ſcire ſecit prefat' H. oſtendꝰ coram 
Domino Rege ad diem & locum predicto 
© prout ſibi preceptu' fuit qui quidem H. fc 
„ premunit” per G. N. Attorn ſuum ſiliter] 

* ven 


c 
. 
c 
( 
C 
£ 


N 
( 
{ 
. 
, 
{ 
| 


| Bar in Detinue. 467 
rung. ven & ſuper hoc predict J. petit liberationem 
J predicti ſcripti obligator? verſus prefat H. 
ad fibi adjudicati, c. | i 
Do Et predict H. C. dic? ꝗqd' ſcriptum Obliga- Interpleder 
J. I torid pred? fibi & non prefat J. liberari debet perenter le 
pre. quia dic qd' ſcriptum predictuꝰ fact ſuit die & — le 
N in nno in narratione predicta ſupetius ſpecifi- : 
Cure cat per ipſum H. & idem J. ulterius dic? qd? 
ci remore Conſectionis ſoripti predicti diverſe 
t qa lites & controverſie habite & mote fue- 
apud runt inter ipſum H. & prefat' J. qd'q; ante 
n PF confectionem ejuſdem ſcripti ſcilt' 16 die 
atuu Nov' Anno 10. ſupradicto apud C. in Com' 
Cert predict” iidem H. & J. le ſubmiĩſiſſent & com- 
fei: primiſſent in arbitriuꝰ judiciu & ordinatio- 
and nem predictorum (Def) ad finalem Arbi- 
edit triuꝰ & Deter minationem de litibus & contro- 
NNE verſüs ill faciend', & idem H. ulterius dic gd' 
em immediate poſt confectionem ſcripti predicti 
Son ſcriptum illud deliberatum fuit equa manu 
© Hf per ipſum H & prefat' J. prefatis J. (Def') & 
eſtnſs C. ſalvo cuſtodiend & prefat J. deliberand L' effect de 
a ſi idem (Def') lices & controverſias ptedictas Condition. 
ſciaſfinirent & determinarent per arbitriuꝰ judiciu 
eſa & Ordinationem ſuam, Et fi idem (Def”) 
& lites & controverſias predictas per arbitriu 
| QF judiciu' & ordinationem ſuam non finirent 
dien: ſeu dererminarent tunc iidem (Def') ſcrip- 
Oran tum Obligatoriu' predictuꝰ eidem H. C. red- 
n Pre derent & redeliberarent, Et idem H. ulte- 
5 ſuck * rius dic? qd' predict? (Def) per arbitriu? 
etorng judiciu* & ordinationem ſuam non finiver* 
lire © ſeu determinaver' litres & controverſias pre- 
es de dictas inter ipſum H. & ptedict' ]. Per quod 
ram ad ipſum H. C. pertinet ad habend' liberatio- 
dictaſ : nem ſcripti obligatorii predict', Et hoc 
J ſq parat' eſt verificare, Unde pet' judiciu & 
iliter . libetationem ſcripti illus ſibi adjudicari, &c. 
ven H h 2 wp 


o 1 8 +5 * * Wh; 1 r 
e EI STD Ee OTTPOR Ire- 


“ )DMDsneesm 2 


468. 


Replication. 


Travers deli- 
very {ur Con- 
dition. 


Iſſue ſur le 


Traverſe. 


© ſcriptu? obligatoriu predictu per ipſos (Def) 


c 
c 
0 

1 
c 
p 
c 


Bar in Detinue. 


Et predictꝰ J. T. dicit qd' ſcriptum obliga. 
toriuꝰ predictu' ſibi & non preſat H. C. libe. 
rari debet quia dic* qd' idem J. predict tal 
Die & Anno ſupradicto apud C. predi& inf 
Com' predict liberaſſet preſat' (Del 


6. 

£ 

c 

* 

ſalvo cuſtodiend? & eidem J. cum inde requi- 
ſit' eſſent redeliberand? modo & forma proutf 
© idem J. narrando fepetius allegavit Abſq; hoch 
© q@ ſcriptuꝰ predictu' deliberatum fuit equaſi 
manu per ipſum H. & prefat* J. prefatif 
© (Def”) cuſtodiend' & preſat J. deliberand 
modo & forma prout idem H. C. ſuperiu 
© placitando allegavit, Et hoc parat eſt verifi 
care unde petit judiciuꝰ & liberationem ſcripiſ 
obligatorii predict? unacum dampnis fi 
© occo'ne detentionis ſcripti predicti ſibi adjuf 
k dicari, &. | 
Et predict' H. C. ut prius dicit qq* pref 
dict'ꝰ ſcriptu' obligatariu* deliberatu' fuĩt equi 
manu per ipſum H. & prefat' J. prefatiff 
(Def) ſalvo cuſtodiend' & prefat' J. deli 
berand' modo & forma prout idem H. ſupel 
rius placitando allegavit, Et de hoc pon 
ſuper Priam', Et predict J. filiter” To? ve 
inde Jur* coram Domino Rege apud Wefin 
© die, &c. Et qui nec, &c. Ad recogn', & 
Quia tam, &c. Idem dies dat' eſt partib 
* predictis ibm', &c. Vide Aft. Ent. 20 
® als 171, &c. Lets D, d. 


* Bar in Detinue. -469 


0 count by T. G. an Heir, againſt}. B. and W. B. 

e = Box ſealed, with Writings, Defendants * * * 
ef) plead, That ane B. J. brought a Writ for 
qui the ſame Bax, and pray that B. J. may "Gd 


count againſt them, &c. And he counts 
againſt them, againſt W. B. and J. B. 


£quayl 


aud ther Defendants pray, that T. G. and 
elatis if ® . 
rand B. J. ay interplede, &c. (ut ſequitur.) 
533, 1125 
tea PI predict W. B. & J. B. per N. T. Defendants 
_ 'L Attorn' ſuum ven & defend? vim & "ns Mong 
O wiſh injur quando, &c. Et proferend' hic in Cur' plaintiffs 
| adJu | pixidem predict' ſigillat* cum Cartis, &c. may interplede. 


parat' ad deliberand' cui predict“ T. G. & 
B. J. Curia Dom' Regis hic cons', pet' qq” 
idem T. & B. hic ad hunc diem, &c. Simul 
comparentes interplitent', cui eorum pixis 
predict cum cartis, &c. de jure debeat Jibe- Le 1. pet' l- 
rari, Et ſuper hoc predict T. G. pet' verſus haco nem; 
predict W. B. & J. B. liberationem pixid' Le 2. Proteſt? 
predict cum cartis, &c. Et predict B. pro- 400, &c. 
teſtand' ꝗd' predict“ W. Pater J. nunquam 
habuit aliquem ſororem nomine H. & qd? 
predict T. G. non eſt de ſanguine predict 
. dic* qꝗd' pixis predict' cum cartis, &c. 
dibi & non prefat T. G. liberari debec 
guia dic qd” predict” J. G. ſuit ſeiſitꝰ de tentis 
predict cum pertinen' in Dominico ſuo ut 
le feodo, Et de tali Statu inde obiir ſeitus', Pro placito 
oſt cujus mortem tenta' il cum pertin que le terre 
for tiebant' eidem B. ut Conſanguineo & reſort a lui 
Couſered' ejuſdem J. G. videlt', (c.) Et ea e Heir. 
aco' ne pixis illa cum cartis, &c. eidem B. 
ertinet' liberari, &c. Et hoc parat' eſt 
rificare, & Unde petit judiciu' & libera- 
IH h 3 * tionem 


” pre 
t equ 
orefati 
J. dell 
. {aps 
pon 

ve 
Weſt 
n', & 
partib 
K. 20 


470 Bar in Detinũe. 
8 ' tionem ejuſdem pixidis cum Cartis, &c. un 

© cum dampnis ſibi adjudicari, &c. 
Rep!' per Et predict T. G. dic qd? pixis predi 
T. G. que cum cartis, &c. Gbi'& non prefat* B. lib 
le terre re- © rari debet, quia dic ꝗd' bene & verum, 
fort a luy | © o@ predict J. G. ſuit ſeitus de teneme 


come Heir, and c predictꝰ cum pertinen* in Dominico ſuo 


3 2 © de feodo & de tali Statu obiit ſeitus* pn 


Brother S. © predict? B. ſuperius allogavit & de i 
Et Hue ſur J. G. reſortiebacur jus eorundem tent'on 
ceo. . pertin? eidem T. G. ut Conſanguin 


© & hered. ejuſdem J. G. videlt', (c) "Ec 

© raco'ne pixis predict cum cartis, &c. 

g * ipſum T. G. pertinet' liberari, Abſqz 95 

5 of predict W. pater predict J. calem 

© buit frem' S. nomine in forma qua idem 
ſupet ius allegavit, Et hoc paratꝰ eſt verificy 

© Unde petit judiciu* & liberationem pi 

Xa unacum dampnis, &c. ſibi adj 

© Cari, &c. ; 

Iſſue. « Ee predict B. proteſtando ut prĩus ꝗd' 
* dict W. pater J. nunquam habuit aliqq 

$ * ſororem H nomine, Et qd predict 1 

© non eſt de ſanguine predict J. dic' qd'; U 

* dia? W. pater J. talem habuit ſratrem S. 

mine, in ſorma qua idem B. ſuperius all i 

“vit, Et hoc per” qd” inquiratur per Pati 

. Er predict T. G. ſimiliter, 5 * p 


© Raſt. Ent. 213. 4 


0 


1 


To à Count in C. B. by Bill againſt oy . 
the Juſtices, of a Kacke bk, is 
Boxes ſealed, 20 Writings in them. 


ſ 


f. FP predict R. J. in propr ' perſona 
ven* & defend' vim & injur? of 


E do, &cc. Et * hic in Cur' pre 
| ; 7 


= 


* 


Bar in Detinue: 471 
an ciſtam ſerat? ac predi& pixides ſigillatꝰ parat 

ad deliberand' cui vel quibus Curia hic cons. 
e dic' qd” ciſte & pixides predict die & anno. 

N ſupradictꝰ apud, &c. Deliberat' fuer” eidem Plea per bail. 
m R. J. tam per quendam H. V. quam per ment a Juy 


wel prefat W. C. equa manu ſub certis conditio- per le Plains 
ſuo ; nibus ſalvo cuſtodiend', eidem H. ſeu prefat tiff & G. a 


w. ſub conditionibus illis deliberand', Sed 3 
MW verum conditiones ill ex parte predict H. & prie Gar- 
a⸗dimplet' ſunt, dic' qd' ipſe ignorat & pe- niſhment 
tit qd' predict H. inde premuniatur, &c. vers“ H. 
| E Et ei conceditur, &c. Ideo precept' eſt Vic 

L. qd' per probos, &c. Scire fac' prefat' H. 
Jad' fit hic die (&c.) prox' ſutur', oſtens' i 
Wquid, &c. quare predict' ciſta ſerat & pixides 
ſigillat' prefat' W. deliberari non debeant fi, 
&c. Ad quem diem hic ven' tam pred' W. per 
Attorn' ſuum pred”. quam pred R. in propria 
perſona ſua, & predict' H. premunit' per, 
c.) Attorn' ſuum ſimiliter ven', Et ſuper 
a loc predict W. petit deliberationem predict 
| iq ciſte & pixidum cum cartis, &c. ſibi habend” 
a TEE adjudicand', &c. Et predict H. dic qd' 

4 iberatio predict' ciſte & pixidum cum car- 

ky tis, &c. ſibi & non prefat', W. pertinet ha- 
jus all bend & adjudicari debet quia die qq' eedem 
Pati iſta & pixides cum cartis, 8c. die & anno 

Hopradict' apud, &c. predict” deliberat' fuer 

Preſat' R. tam per ipſum H. quam per pre- 

fat“ W. equa manu falvo cuſtodiend' ſub con. The Condi- 
Pitione ſequen', videlt' qq* fi idem H. ſolve- tions. 

ſt onſpet aut ſolvi faceret predict W. 300 libr' lega- 
Kd, is moner Ang! videlt' 30 die J-turc prox fe. 
them {ven qa” tunc pred” R. deliberaret eidem H. 
redict” ciſtam & pixides cum cartis, &c. Et 
i eedem H. non ſolveret neque ſolvi faceret 
ur Prefat W. eaſdem treſcent' libr eodem 30 
jr Tie J. qd' tunc pred J. deliberaret eidem W. 
of Hh 4 * ealden 


b, 


3 


erſon 


EF — — . 1 2 A 


472. 


Bar in Detinue. | 
© eaſdem_ciſtam & pixides cum cartis, &c. Ef 
idem H. dic qd ipſe predicto 30 die J. apud,f 
Kc. parat' ſuit ſolvere & adtunc & ibm' ob. 


a tulit predict” W. predict” 300 libr ei eoden : 


Iſſue ſur le 
oficr, | 
Bar 1. Le 


Plaintiff fuit 
de ceo p ſſeſſe 
& ceo pede 
& J. ceo 
trove, & le 
Plaintiff re- 
leas a [ & J. 
ceo done al 


Def'. 


© die ſolvend', & idem W. eaſdem ducent libr 
de ipſo H. recipere adtunc & ibm' penituf 
© recuſavit, Et hoc parat' eſt verificare, Und 
petit judicium & liberationem predict' ciſi 
© & pixidꝰ cum cartis, &c. ſibi adjudicari, &c 

Et predict W. dic? qd' predict' H. no 
obtulit eidm' W. predict 300 libr* folvend 
predict? 30 die J. prout predict H. ſuperi 
allegavit, Et hoc pet' qd inquiratur per P. 
triam, Et predict' H. ſimiliter, Ideo precep! 
eſt Vic qd' yenire fac' hic die, &c. pro 
poſt, &c, duodecim, 8c. per quos, 8&c. I 
qui nec, &c. Ad recogn', &c, Quiatam, & 
* Idem dies dar” eſt tam prefat' W. quam pr 
© dict H. & ſimiliter pretac” J. hic, &c. Vi 
* Raf. Ent. in Tit, Detinue. 


c 
£ 
C 
C 
c 
c 
c 


En Detinue de Eſcript perdit”, 


: Þ" predict? J. T. per J. N. Attorn' ſui 
L ven' & defend' vim & injur' qui 
* do, &c. Et dic' qq' Actionem non (& 
© Quia dic? qd' diu ante dictum viceſim 

diem M. dicto Anno viceſimo quinto, 
mini Regis nunc in narr' dicti A. ſpecifi 
videlt die (&c.) Anno (&c.) predict] 
in Paroch' ſancti Chriſtoferi in dicta m 
ipſius A. ſpecificat' tuir poſſeſſionat' de fer 
indentato predict” ut de ſcripto ſuo prop 
Et inde poſſeſſionat' idem A. dicto qui 
* die F. Anno, (&c.) ſupradicto in Parod 
* faniC. predict, dictum ſcriptum inden 
* caſualit? amiſit, & quidam J. S. tunc L 
* don Epiſcopus ſcriptum indentat' illud d 

| ; 5 


4 | qu 
#34 


c 
c 
0 
c 
c 


c 
c 


[1 


Bar in Detinue. 4 
. Bl © quinto-die F. Anno, &c. ſupradicto ibm“ in- 
pudi i © venit, Virtute cujus idem J. S. tunc London, 
Ml © Epiſcopus fuit inde poſſeſſionat', Idemque 
»Querens, die, (&c.) Anno (&c.) in Paroch' Releas de 
ſancti C. London predict per factum ſuum Actions, &c, 
| © cujus dat' eſt eiſdm' 19 die F. Anno 26. ſu. 
pradicto, ſigillo ipſius A. ſignat' remiſit re- 
i la xavit & omnino pro ſe Executoribus & Ad- 
miniſtratoribus ſuis imperpetuum quiet' clama- 4 
vit prefat? J. S. tunc Epiſcopo London, om- i 
nes & omnimod' Actiones tam reales quam 
perſonales privat' ſen popular” ſectas querelꝰ 
debit' debat' demand' & executiones que vel 
gquas habuit verſus ipſum J. S. ratione ſeu 
cauſa quacunque prout per idem factum hic 
* Cur oſtensꝰ plenius liquet, Virtute cujus idem 
©]. S. tunc London Epiſcopus ſuit de ſcripto 
jndent' Hl poſſeſſionat'ꝰ ut de ſcripto inden- 
© tat! proprio, Et ſic inde poſſeſſionat' idem x 
J. S. in dict' Paroch“ ſancti C. primo die 1 
M. Anno, &c. ſupradicto dedit & delibera- 
: vit ſeriptum indentatum illud prefat' J. vir- 
| © tute cujus idem J. fuir poſſeſſionat de ſcripto 
n' fo} © indentato illo ut de ſcripto indentat' ſuo pro- 
qui prio, Et ſic inde poſſeſſionat' idem J. ſcrip- 


ad FAS * 


73 


- SS, . : 4 
— 3 as i 


n (tum predi&? 18 die M. Anno, (&c.) ſupra- 
ceſimi * dicto in Paroch' ſancti C. London extra poſ- 
to, DE * ſeflion' ſuam caſualit amiſit, Et quidam J. D. 
pecif ſcriptum illud poſtea ſcilt' dicto 18 die M. 
edict 


| Anno, &c. ſupradicto ibm' invenit & ſcrip- ! 
Gta ni © tum illud poſtea ibm' dicto decimo octavo | 
de {cif die M. Anno, &c. ſupradigto dedit eidem 
prop] © Quer?, Virtute cujus idem Querens fuit inde 
to qui poſſeſſionat', Et lic inde poſſeſſionat' idem 
Paroq ; © Querc* poſtea ſcilt' dicto viceſimo die M. An- 
inden no, &c. ſupradito in dicto Pa: och' ſancti 
unc IC. ſcriptum illud extra poſſeſſionem ſuam bi 
lud dÞ caſualiter amiſit, prout in narr* ſpecificatur q 
qa © quod < 


r 
72 2 
n 2 L ad 


_ 1 at - 
— Peta 1——— . 


474 


Bar in Detinue. 


© quod quidem ſcriptum indentat” poſtea fcilt | 
© dicto viceſimo die M. Anno 28. ſupradicto 
© ad manus di& defend” pro inventionem de- 
© ver? prout in narr* ipſius Quer' ſpecificatur, | 
© cuyus pretextu idem Det” ſcriptum indentat 
© predict” ut ſcriptum ſuum proprium detinet | 


_ © proutei bene licuit, Et hoc, &c. Unde per | 


© judicum ſi Actionem inde, &c. Vide Raft, | 
Ent. fo. 209. 


Theſe Precedents may ſuffice upon this Head 
of Detinue, with Reference to the Books firſt | 


mentioned, as allo to the Tables of Mr. Town- | 
fend and Mr. Cornwall, Tit. Detinue. 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 


. Proceſs of Quare Impedit, (as is ob- 
ſerved in the Second Part of Inſtruct. 
Clerical. Tit” eod') lieth where a Man hath an} 
Advowſon, and the Patron dieth, and another 
preſenteth his Clerk, or diſturbeth him that 
hath the Right to preſent ; and for further 
Learning concerning it, Reference is there 
made to Compleat Sollicitor, and Compleat At- 
torney; alſo to the Surrey of the Law, and Touch. | 
ſtone of Precedents, &c. | 
But, in Truth, it is a Matter of much Nice- 
ty, and deſerveth to be treated of in a Volume 
by it felf : However, That the Pleadings to this 
Head may not be left altogether imperfect, 


ſome Precedents and Obſervations ſhall be made 
thereon. 


Pleas 


rther 
there 
t At- 


| © Fudgment for the Plaintiff. 


|. Bar in Quare Impedir: 


Pleas in Abatement in Quare Impedit. 


HERE are ſeveral Precedents pleaded in 

Abatement of this Action, as Abatement 

for Miſnoſmer of the Sirname, and Iſſue there- 
upon. Vide Raſt. Ent. 516. 


. Quꝗ' ſunt 2 Ecclie? de S. in Com”, Qua- 


rum una vocat' S in le Vale, & altera S. ſu- 


© per montem, Et travers' qd? eſt Ecciiz' vo- 
© cat* S. tantum. Ie thereupon. Verdict and 
Id 523. 

J. * Clicus plitat' qd* nichil clam? nifi 


{ © ex preſentatione G. non noiat' in brevi, 


J. © Clicus' plitat' qd? ipſe eſt perſona im- 
* perſonat' ad preſentatione J. 1. Def & E. 
© ux' ejus Tenen' in tallio' in caſſacon' brevis, 
Eo qꝗd' E. non noiĩat' in brevi, & Demurrer 
* inde. 

N. The Biſhop claims nothing but as O di- 


| nary, and the Patron and Parſon demur to the 


ouch. 


Nice 
lume 
o this 
rfect, 
made 


Pleas 


Count. Co Ent. 492. & Doct' Demur 29. 


8 


475 


J. See the zd of Levinx rF. in a Quare Im. abatement 
pedit, for Simony between the Grantee for the fo that the 
next Avoidance, and his Sifter, Defendant, P-tron is not 
pleads in Abatement, for that the Parron is nor narred in the 


named in the Writ, and the Attorney - General 
demurred; and it was held, That in ſuch 
Caſe the Patron need not be named, for his 
Title is not in Queſtion, but admitted; and 
the King claims in Affi mance of his Title. and 
in his Right; but thro' the Deſauſt of the De- 
ſendant, and the Patron, ſhall not he put ou of 
Poſſeſſion by a Recovery in this Action; and 
the Patron had the Fruit of his Preſæentment, 


but 


tic. 


/ "= 


"476 - Bar in Quare Impedit. 

| but his Clerk ſhall be removed for his Simom, 
and a Reſpond ouſter was awarded. ', 
e for . To a Declaration in Quare Impedit upon af 
the Patron Title of Simony; per quod, it belong'd to King 

was not Charles the 2d to preſent [Death of King Charles 
named, the 2d, and Diſcent to King James the 2d]; De. 

fendant pleads in Abatement, That J. . his 

Patron, was not named in the Writ; Plaintiff 
demurs, and Defendant joins in Demurrer, MW 

2 Lut, 1086, c. & 1089. where the Re- 

porter obſerves, that this Caſe was once argu- 

ed, and ordered to be argued again, but he] 

could not find it was, but upon the Argument, 

the Book of 47 Ed. 3. fol. 10 & 11. and] 
alſo a Caſe between the King and Sownzon, 
Trin. 33 Car. 2. Rot 1882. were cited; and 
that the Writ was good notwichſtanding the 
: Patron was not named in it, vide 7 Co. 26, 
A Difference 2. þ where this Difference is taken, That when 
1 is taken. the Inheritance, Eſtate or Interelt, of the Pa. 
| tron ſhall not be diveſted by the Judgment, 
then if another Diſturber is named in the 
Writ, there's no Need to name the right Pa- 
tron 3 and upon this Difference leveral Caſes 
are there cited, eſpecially 22 E. 4. 44. Pl. 7. 

Averment It is noted, That in the Declaration there 1s 
that it was a an Averment, that the Benefice was a Benefice 
| Benefice with with the Cure of Souls; and the Reporter 
j Cure. makes a Quere, if it be not neceſſary in this 
Caſe, and cites 1 And. 6. where, upon a 
Demurrer, the Declaration was adjudged ill, 
for not alledging it was a Benefice with Cure 
| of Souls; as are alſo the Precedents in Co. Ent. 
_ Winch, Ent. Briun's Ent. Brown!. Rediviv, Clift's 
1 Entr, But he further obſerves, That there is 
ſome Difference between the Stat. 13 Eliz. 
cap. 12, and Stat, 31 Elix. cap. 6. de Simony, 
and makes a Quere, if it makes any Difference 
in 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 
io the Caſes. But Quere 2 Lar. 1093. where an 
Exception was taken in Quare Impedit upon a 
Simoniacal Contract, That the Statute of 
31 Kix. cap. 6. ought to have been recited, 
ed non allocat?, | 
| /. The Defendant's in Quare Impedit Rex wer? Abatement 
on London and Dr. Lancaſter plead Vari. for Variance 


ance between the Writ and Count; and the between 5 
Attorney General demurs to the Plea, and Writ an 


Yoinder in Demurrer by the Biſhop and Doctor. Count. 
ie Lev. Ent. 144, &c, And 


Pep. 377. Variaco non allocat? 


477 


no other Form 
ut the Prerogative is mentioned in the Count, 


chereſore a Reſpond oufter was awarded 5 and 
then the Biſhop demurred upon the Count, an Dad 

he Doctor pleads over Stat. 2 J H. 8. of Diſpen. 5 
Lions, and a Diſpenſation to Dr. . to hold 
pn Commendam. That Dr. T was afterwards 
Rade Biſhop of Lincoln, and the Diſpenſation 
Fecoming void iſt Fuly; the Biſhop of London 

ben collated him the Defendant. The At. der; 
pemey-General joins in Demurrer with the — ant 
t Pa- iſhop, and after demurs upon the Plea of Lanca- 5 
Jaſes Wer, who alſo joins in the Demurrer. Vide Doe, 

. and 3 Lev. 357, where 
Te is s held, That if any Parſon be created a Bi» 

hop, the King ſhall preſent, not only for that 

Time, but rories quoties it may ſo happen, E; 
this dic pro Rege. 


on 2 See more concerning Stat. of Dilpenſations, 
d ill, Lat. 1708, Winch. Em. 635. Hob. 140. 
-ure ¶ See the like Plea in Abatement, 


Ent, Patron is not named in the Writ, an 


That the Stat. of DiC. 


» and. Demur. penſations, 
lift's er thereto by Attorney-General, and Joinder 
re is de. Clift, En. 627. Bro, Rediviv. 410, Ge. 
Elix. J In 1 Lat. Fol, 1. 


Quare Impedit is brought Quare impe. 


201), WJ Executors to preſent to an Archdeacon. dit breugh: z, 
nce ll. 4 


ry F an Executor 
in 


A ; * * 5 * 5 * * 


478 


Defendant, 
after Oyer, 
pleads in 


Abatement 
no ſuch Writ 


in the Regi- ad aliquam Eccliaw dignitai, &. That th 


ſter. 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 
ry; and ſets forth, That the Predeceſſor of 
che Biſhop was ſeized in Gros, and collated 
L. G. that the Biſhop died, and the now Bi. 
ſhop Defendant was elected; then ſets forth 
a Grant of the Advowſon by the now Defen. 8 
dant to FJ. B. for 21 Years, and an Aſſign. 
ment to the Teſtator of the Plaintiff, and the 
Death of G. the Incumbent, in the Life off 
the Teſtator, per quod it belong d to thei 
Teſtator to preſent : That he died, and «a r 
it belongs to the Plaintiffs, his Executors, toll 
preſent,, and the Defendants in the Teſtator' 
Life time, mjuſte impediverunt in retardation 
Execution Teſt, &. Defendant, after Oyer 
pleads in Abatement, that there is no ſuch Form 
inthe Regiſter, pro Executore vel Executor alicuſu 
perſone de impedimento fact Teſt atori ad preſent anti 


Writ ſuppoſes the Archdeaconry to be void 
and that the Executors may ſue their Writ | 
That the Wric contains a double Impedimen 1 
one to the Teſtator, and another to the EX 
cutors ; and that it alſo ſuppoſes, That the Im b 
pediment made to the Teſtator in his Liſe 


time to be an Impediment made in Retardatiu 1 


Executionis predict Teſti, which could no wp 
be. The Plaintiffs demur, and Defendant joinff & 
in Demurrer. I Lut. 3. p 
And it is there obſerved, That this Caſe p 
reported in Savil 94. where it is ſaid, That i p- 
Diſturbance in the Life-rime of the Teſtarqf m 
was alledged in the Writ, and alſo anoth d- 
Diſturbance in the Time of the Executony p 
but it appears by the Record, that there is of 
ly one Diſturbance mentioned in the Life- tin 
of the Teſtator. And Fol. 4. Lur. 1. The Rt 
porter ſays, he had view'd the Record of t 
Caſe, and there is no Judgment entred * f 
al 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 479 
Rolls; but that there is another Action brought 
ſor the ſame Archdeaconry; and that the Caſe 
is alſo reported in Savil 118. Vide Doct' De- 
nur 260. Et 2 Brown, 206. Preſentation' per Ad- 
miniſtratorem placitat”. | 
J. Vide Abatement, for that the Plaintiff is a 
| Popiſh Recuſant convict. Winch. Ent. 753. Vide 
2 Lat. 1119. Et vide Doct Demur 3 20. 
. Abatement per UtP in Debito in Coi 
= Banco. 1 Brown 296. 


J J © Simile per auter Action' penden'. Vin. 
„E. 783. Bro, Rediviv. 410. 


rs 

on ; : 

er Bar in Quare Impedit per Non Impedivit. 
1911 


TL U 


IL predict Comes & J. N. per R. ]. 
5 Attorn' ſuum ven & defend? vim & 
th injur? quando, &c. Et dic qd' ipſi non im- 
od pediunt predict' T. ad preſentand' idoneam 
vr perſonam ad Eccleſiam predict, Et hoc pa- 
gen rat' ſunt verificare, Unde per judic' fi pre- 
Ex dict T. Action” ſuum predict' vers' eos ha- 
e Im bere debeat, &c. Et quia predict Comes & 
Lie J. N. nihil clamant in Eccleſia predi& nec 
ia Advocatione ejuſdem, Ideo cons eſt qd' Judgment 
way predict T. recuperet vers predict Comit ꝗd' Quer 


— : "4.00 recuperet 
t join & J. N. preſentation ſuam ad Eccleſiam preſentatio- 


predict, Ec habeat Breve Epiſcopo, &c. Et 
aſe predict? Comes & J. N. in mia, &c. Et ſu- 
nat per hoc predict' T. gratis hic in Cur' re. 
W mictit prefat' Comiti & J. N. quecunque 
dampna eidem T. occaſione Impediment 
bpred' adjudicand', &c. Vide Raft. Ent. 5 17. 


The 


48⁰ 


Bar. 


Repf. 


.c 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 


The Incumbent pleads nothing but as Parſon 
upon the Preſentment of K. Repl', Od 
fuit ejus Impeditor, Et Exit inde, | 


. T predict T. per W. K. Attorn' ſuunf 
, ven & defend' vim & injur' quan 
© do, & c. Et dic' ꝗqd' iple nichil clam' in Ad, 
© vocatione Eccleſie predict' niſi qd' ſolummodi 
© Perſona Eccleſie il exiſtit inſtitutꝰ in eaden 
© ad preſentationem cujuſdam K. que ſuit U xo 
© R. fil' R. & fuit die impetrac' Brevis Ori. 
predict M. fcilt' 3 die J. Anno, &c. Et ho, 
parat eſt verificare, Unde pet' judic' fi pi 
© dit M. Actionem ſuam predict vers' eunfi 
© habere debeat, 
Et predict M. dic' ꝗd' ipſa per aliqua pi 
© allegat ab Actione ſua predict habend' pj 
cludi non debet quia dic qdꝰ predict T. pri 
© dicto die impetrac' Brevis Orig' ſui, ſuit ei, 
© Impeditor ſicut ipla ſuperius per Breve 1 
© narration' predict ſuppon', Et hoc pet' of 
© inquiratur per Patriam, Et predict' T. ſimii 


8 Ideo X11. KC. Raſt. Ent, 513. | 


* 


Non impedivit, Judlic' &. Breve ſuperin ſc 
Epi ſcopo de admittend. Clericum, Of R 
Set ceſſet Executio quouſque, Cc. | 


A. yy Md 


F. © ET 8predict' nunc Epiſcopus per LI. 

£ Atcorn' ſuum ac predic” A. per 8. 
© Attorn' ſuum ven & defend? vim & in 
* quando, &c. Et dic' qd' ipſi non impedit 
* preliat' Comitem ad preſentand' idoneam | 
* ſon-m ad Eccleſiam predit' prout id 
Comes per Breve & Narr” ſua predict fu 

c 


* 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 481 

x rius ſuppon*, Et hoc parat' ſunt verificare, 

Unde pet judic' ſi predi&” Comes Actionem 
© ſuam predict” vers eos habere debeat, &c. 
Et predit Comes ex quo predict nunc 
Epiſcopus & A. nichil clam' in Eccleſia pre. 
dict' neque in advocatione ejuſdem pet' judic' 
& Breve Epiſcopo, &c. lde&o cons' eſt qd' Judic' qd- 
pftedict' comes recuperet preſentationem ſuam Quer' recy« 
vers eaſdem nunc Epiſcopum & A. Et ha- Petet. 
beat Breve eidem nunc Epiſcopo qd' non 
obſtan' reclam' ipſorum nunc Epiſcopi & A. 
ad preſentationem ipſius Comit' ad Eccle- 


TG lentatiot 
fl am predict idoneam perſonam admittar, 
ho Set ceſſet inde executio quouſque placitum 


int ipſum Comit' & prefat J. A. tei minetur, 


Ra. - 6 — 
* (2 ts 5 W — 3 £ A LE 
| * 3 8 — 
R _ — - 2 - 8 q 2 * * * a * 3 — 


pr | 
eu &c. Raſs, Ent. 522. 
P'll A Venire Facias ad triand Exit G. 4 

1 | 577 Aft 
4 Dampnis. 9 
e | - [4 7 : . ” P 'N 
e GET ceſſet inde executio quouſque pla- 4 
. O citum inde int” predict P. & predict' : 
nil Epiſcopum & Comitem terminetur, &c. { 


Et predict P. pro dampnis ſuis in hac parte 
F habend' dic' qd' predict N. injuſte impe- 
dit ipſum P. ad prefentand' idoneam per- 
rin ſonam ad predict Eccleſiam de 8. &c: 
OW Raft. Ent. 513. 


] ˙·¹ / ͥͥ; . ³ -mͤ i ont Ä 


| Simile ad triand Exit junct. | 
i . E D interim ceſſet, &c. Et quoad þ 
* 85 triand' predict Exit ſuper ius ad Pa- | 
K. triam junct', precept” eſt Vio qd' Venire 10 
| © Fac hic in Octab', &c. xii, & e. Per quos, &c. | 
we Et qui nec, &c. Idem 514. . 


* in 117 © Vide 


Coo En RT IEICE. wt; — . 


% = I AE inn Ye oe 


482 Bar in Quare Impedit. 


© Vide placitum de non impedivit, & Bree 
© ſuperinde Epiſcopo de admfttend' Clericum 


& Venire fac ad triand' Exit” pro dampnis 
© 14.503. 


Cogn Ackionem in Quare Impedit, Et Quer 


remittit dampna. 


. E“ predict' J. R. in propr* perſon' ſua, 

f Et predict S. per J. R. Attorn' ſuun 
ven & defend” vim & injur* quando, &c. EA 
* dic qd' ipſi non poſſunt dedicere Actionem 
© predict” J. P. predict nec quin ad ipſunſifi 


© J. P. ratione in narr' ipſius J. P. ſuperius con 


* rent, Ad predict' Eccleſiam de Y. que vacat 
© pertineat preſentare, Ideo cons' eſt qd' pre. 
Judgment dict' J. P. recuperet vers' predict J. R. & 5 ö 


| qd" Quer? preſentationem ſuam ad predict Eccleſfianſſf. 
recuperet, © de Y. Et habeat Breve Epiſcopo qq' non ob. 


&c. 


1  »© ſtan' reclamar” ipſorum J. & S. ad preſenta . 


E © tion' ipſius J. P. ad Eccleſiam ill idoneamſi 
( perſonam admittat, Er predict J. R. & S. in.; 
| mia', &c. Super quo predict” J. P. gratis re 


mittit prefat' J. R. & S. dampna ſua ſibi eajſ 


idem J. & S. de dampnis ſint quieti, &cl 
Vide Raſt. Eut. 521. Vide poſtea. 


J 


— . Dr - 
- 


Non Impedivit, and ſeveral other 
Pleadings. 


3 ON Impedivit, Et judic' ſuperinde 

- pro Attorn' Domini Regis & Breve 
©* Epiſcopo ad admittend' Clericum. Winch 
Ent. 700, 


. © Nor 


occaſione, Per Curiam hic adjudicand?, Ideoffi 


828 — 2 8 «a Fo fat — — tw 


tit 
R 


bh 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 483 
Non Impedivie per x Def” judic' ſuper- 
| © inde, fed ceſſet Executio quouſque placitum 
e int” Quer' & al Def” terminetur, Et nichil 
| © de mia' quia Def? eſt infra etatem. 2 Brew». 
6 224. Wi. Ent. 710. 
. One Defendant pleads Non impedi vit, the 
other pleads ſpecially. Raſt. Ent. 528. Winch. 
= Ent. 703. 
J. © Clericus nichil clamat niſi ut Perſo naim- 
| © perſonat', Et judic? ſuperinde, alius Def” 
[* placitat' ad Exit'. Raſt, Ent. 529. 
I. /. © Qd Eccleſia eſt plena de Def*, Et tra. Traverſe. 
{© vers ꝗd' vacavit per ejus reſignationem. 
Co. Ent. 265. 
„ © Q& T. non fuit admiſſus ad preſenta- 
cat tionem R. & Exit' inde. Raft. Ent. 530. 
Tr J. © Clericus placitat ꝗqd' ipſe eſt perſona 
Td, ; imperſonat' ad preſentation Avi Quer', Et 
un traverſe qd” Eccleſia fuit vacans. Repl', Qd' Repb, Q 
ob Def? fuit natus extra ſponſalia & non Capax Dcf* non 
nta· . beneficii, quod Epiſcopus ſcivit. Rejo', Pro- capax bene- 
cam teſtando nulla vera, pro placito Epiſcopus Aicil. 
d. iu non ſcivit, Et al refid' Demurrer. Hern 5 49. 
S re. /. Qaq' ult' perſona preſentat' ſuit mere x atcus pre. 
ei Laicus, Et qd' Eccleſia temanſit de Jure va- ſentat' 
Ideoſ cua, Et Archiep'us contulit per Lapſum. 
Ke Co, Ent. 507. 
. Qd' Eccleſia non vacavit modo & forma, 
KRepl', Qd' vacavit per privationem prout in 
Narr'. Raft. Ent. 5009. 
J. Narr' ſuper Concefſion' prox' Advo- Two Grants 
cation' 16 Maii. Bar, Qd' conceſſio fact' ed” die. 
fait Def' eod' die, Et qd' conceſſio fact 
rind} Quer' ſuit primo deliberat 18 Maii & Exit 
Prev inde. Keil. 54. 
Vinch . d' A. ſeit conceſſit prox' Advoca- 
tionem Def. Repl', Qd' non conceſſit. 
Raſt, 5 24. 
Non li 2 ns 


— 


wn ors 1 9 n La 8 — * 2 We NIE M4 
8 4 A * : — B 


* - : = 
— —— 


| 484 Bar in Quare Impedit. | 
| | fe. Qd' predict H. ſeit” conceſſit prox'f 

© Advocat' Def', Et travers qq” dedit in talliof 
| Clericus Hern. 58. 
Schiſmaticus / Bar per Epiſcopum qd' Eccleſia vacan 


preſentatio 


4 $9 » . * | 
per Lapſum. Quer' infra ſex menſes preſentavit Clericumy 
© quem Epiſcopus ſuper Examinatione invenitf 
© fore Schiſmaticum inveteratum, Et pro ei 
* recuſavit eum, Unde dedit notic' Quer', Fi 
© preſentavit per Lapſum, 5 Co. 57. Simily 
Lapſe. Hern 547. 


. Qd' contulit Eccleſiam per Lapſum 
Kepl', Qd' tali die preſentavit Clericum 
quem Epiſcopus recuſavit admittere. Rejo'f 
d' ſuper examinatione, invenit eum de noi 5 b 
ſana Doctrina, Unde dedit notic' Quer. 
Surrejo', Qd' non dedit notic' Quer”. of 
Ent. 5 20. 17 
N . © Simile placitum & Repl', Et Demut 77 
inde, Hob. 197, | 
| f. * Epiſcopus clam* ut Ordinar'. Replf 
d' Eccleſia vacavit per mortem, Et Que 
infra ſex menſes preſentavit & Epiſcopus re 
cuſavit admittere. Rejo', Qd' al' Def” pie 
ſentavit al' Clericum Epiſcopo, Per quo. 
Eccleſia fuit litigioſa, Unde Epiſcopus dediff 
notic' Quer', Et dixit ei qd? faceret commilf 
ſionem de Jure Patronat' fi vellet quod Que P 
non requiſivit, Et Epiſcopus poſt 6 men 
contulit per Lapſum, Demuit' inde, Et ji; 
dic' pro Epiſcopo. Raft. Ent. 11. Vide pe 
ſtea. Similis Rejunctio, Et notic' Quei' d þ 
Per Licenc“ * Jute Patronatus. 
nenn L. Per Epiſcopum, Qd' Archiepus' confi 
— ceſſit ei 3 capere * * in Commen 
dam, Et travers Avoidance in Count, I 
Demurr' inde. Co. Ent. 521. Simile Heb. 14 t. 
Simony. ſſ. Bar per Stat' de Simonie, Et Demur 
* inde. Co. Ent, 476. 


| 
i 


( 
n 
1 
C 
C 
cl 
V 
ſ 
pt 
* 
J 


— . 


N 


Simile ubi 
Eccleſia fuit 
litigioſa. 


] A - a 1a 6a Sa 


Q 6 


* 


een r — 1 
3 « 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 488 


/. © Q& Clericus preſentat' per Quer', ob- 
tinuit aliam Eccleſiam per Simoniam, Et Simony. 


icdeo non fuit capax alterius beneficii. Repl,, 
d' non obtinuit aliam Eccleſiam per Simo- 
* niam. Raſt, Ent. 532. Vide poſtea. 


e Bar per Statut' de Simonia, per quod Ec- Simony. 
cleſia vacavit, Et travers' qd' Eccleſia va- 

cavit per Liberam reſignation' ultimi In- 
cumbentis, Et Exit' inde. 1 Browne 298. 

vide Poſtea. 

f. © Vide Bar per Univerſity de Cambridge, Bar pet Uni- 
per ſeveral As, Acetiam Act 3 Jac. cap. 5, Verſity. 
noi Per quem preſentatio eſt done al Univerſi- 5 
11 ty, 1 1100, Ce. 0 2 il 

8 ; . © Similis Bar per Cancellar', &c. Univer- Simile q 
I ſitat' Oxon' per 3 Jac. &c. Winch. Ent. 738. 6. 


. 


Fr inch. Rep. 11. Hob. 126, 164. 1 
? ; 1 
ep! N 18 
ue! 7 ee OE Ow 1 
Pre | k | 
quo In Quare Impedit a 
dedif 2 7 | 
Wl BE * ” i 
We Epiſcopus nichil clamat niſi ut Ordli- = 
en: narius. 9 
t ug 4 
9 E. predict Epiſcopus, Decanus & Capi. 
1 L, culum per —— Attorn' ſuum ven & 


defend” vim & injur' quando, &c. Et idem 


Pere clamat in Eccleſia predict, neq; in ad- 
7ocatione ejuſdem nift admiſſionem inſtitu- 
Fionem & deſtitutionem perſonarum ad ean- 
dem Eccleſiam, Et cetera que ad Ordina- 
0 lum pertinent, Ut Eccleſie illius Ordina- 
tus, Et hoc parat' eſt verificare, Unde petit 

"oa li 3 © judicium, 


—— — 
— ——— nes 


= ETC I ORIEL GE RS 
* - - 6 oak Aro — coo” . 
1 
_— _— _ 2 — —_ — 


4 
ö 
4 


— — 1 —— I CTY — 82 V4 COLT Ao ne we ö 
- 


486 


Bar per De- 
can' & Ca- 
pitulum, Qd' 
Rex H. Ki 
preſentavit 
W. advocatio 
diſcend' Ed 6. 
qui commiſit 
eam Decan' 
& Capituſo 
in feodo ac 
univit & ap- 
prop! iavi 
cam eis, &c. 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 


* judicium, Et predict T. B. abſque ſpeciali 
* impedimento in perſona ipſius Epiſcopi in 
© hac parte aſſignand', Actionem ſuam predi. 
© am verſus eum habere debear, &c. 

Et predict Decanus & Capitulum dicunty 
© q& predict T. B. Actionem ſuam predict 
© verſus eos habere non debet, Quia dic *q4'M 
: diu antequam predi&' nuper Rex Edw. ſex. 
£ 


tus aliquid habuit in advocatione preditta 

Dominus Henricus nuper Rex Angl octavus] 

fuit ſeiſit' de eadem advocatione ut de ung 
© groſlo per le ut de feodo & Jure, in jure Coſi 
rone fue Ang, Et ſic inde ſeiſit' exiſten 
ad Eccleſiam predict vacantem preſentaui 
quendam J. S. Clericum ſuum, qui ad pre. 
ſentationem ipſius nuper Regis Henrici 8. fue 
© admiſſus inſtitutus & inductus in eadem temWl: 
© ,pore pacis tempore ejuſdem nuper Repiln 
Henrici 8. Idemque nuper Rex fic de AdWſt 
* vocatione predict ſeiſit exiſtens obiit de si 
© ſtatu ſuo inde ſeiſitus, poit cujus mortem ada 
* vocatio predict' deſcendebat prefat* nupe ſe 
Regi E. ſexto ut filio & hered' ejuſdem tis 
per Regis H. 8. per quod idem nuper Reſfide 
E. ſextus fuit ſeiſitus de Advocatione, prWPa 
dict' ut de uno groſſo per fe, ut de feodo me 
jure in jure Corone ſue Angb', Et fic indWaur 
ſeiſit” exiſtens idem nuper Rex E. ſexu ui: 
22 die M. Anno Regni ſui primo, apuſſſpre 
Weſtm' in Com? Midd' per Litteras ſuas P:pra 
tentes quas iidem Decanus & Capitulum (iWua 
magno ſigillo ejuſdem nuper Regis E. ſexier; 
ſigillat' hic in Cur' proferunt quarum daſſpo 
eſt apud Weſtm' predict eiſdem die & annun 
ex certa ſcientia & mero motu ſuis dedit cu 
conceſſit eiſdem Decano & Capitulo Adi ppi 
cationem predict', per nomen Advocatioſ & 
* Donationis juris Patronatus, ac preſentqu 

„tion 


| 
C | 
qt 

: 0 
a fs 
N . 


/// % () ,] . a. — i: 7˙7ß The 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 


i W tionis predict Eccleſie & Rectorie de B. in 
nM Com' D. inter alia habend' tenend' & gau- 


dend Advocationem predict eiſdem Decano 
& Capitulo & Succeſloribus ſuis imperpe- 
tuum, Et ulterius idem nuper Rex E. ſextus 
er eaſdem Litteras ſuas Paten de gratia ſua 
ſpeciali, ac ex certa ſcientia & mero motu 
ſuis, ac auctoritate ſua Regia ſuprema, & 
Eccleſiaſtica qua tunc functus fuit, pro ſe he- 
redibus & ſucceſſoribus ſuis, conceſſit & li- 
centiam dedit eiſdem Decano & Capitulo 
& ſucceſſoribus ſuis ꝗd' iidem Decanus & 
Capitulum & ſucceſſores ſui Rectoriam Ec- 
avi cleſie predict” cum per mortem, reſignatio. 
pie nem ſive deprivationem, aut aliquo alio modo 
fuiſß quocunque vacare contigerit, immediate in 
em ſuos propr? uſus tenere ſibi & ſucceſſoribus ſuis 
dee |; imperpetuum poſſent & valerent abſq; mole- 
Al ſtatione aut impedimento ejuſdem nuper Re- 
e tiſlleis, hered' aut ſucceſſorum ſuorum, & abſqz 
| a0Maliqua preſentatione inductione ſive admil- 
wpWſione alicujus Incumbentis ad eandem Recto- 
iam extunc impoſterum fiend', Et ulterius 
- Reffidem nuper Rex per eaſdem Litteras ſuas 
_ preſatentes voluit ac ex certa ſcientia & metro 
do Wmotu ſuis ac authoritate ſua predictꝰ qui tunc 
c ind ſunctus fuit pro fe heredibus & ſucceſſoribus 
ſexuſuis predict? Rectoriam & Eccleſiam de B. 
apiſpredict prout vacare extunc contigerit ut ſu- 
1as Pptadict' eſt, ac omnia & ſingula maneria mel- 
m ſſuag terras tenementa reddit' reverſiones 
. ſexi{ervicia glebas obligationes decimas penſiones 
di portiones fructus proficua commoditates emo- 
E anifilumenta poſſeſſiones & hereditamenta que- 
cunque cum eorum pertinentiis univerſis tam 
Adu ſpiritualia quam temporalia eiſdem Rectorie 
atioſ & Eccleſie (lic ut prefertur) vacantibus quo- 
eſeniſ quomodo ſpectan five pertinen? eiſdem De- 
6 xio! 114 cano 


487 


488 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 


f cano & Capitul' & ſucceſſoribus ſuis ac dig; 


Eccleſie ſue, Cathedral' appropriavit confol 


Q Eccleſia 
vacavit, & 
ef fuer 
perſone & 
Ed. 6. poſtea 
preſentavit, 
ſed 1 
tio fuit vacua 
eo qd' Eccle- 
{ta fuit plena. 


* davit univit & incorporavit habend' teneniſ 
* gaudend' & convertend' eaſdem Rector ia 
* & Eccleſiam de B. predict ac omnia & inf 
: =o premiſſa eiſdem Rectorie & Eccle(lfi 
* ſpectan* & pertinen' eiſdem Decano & Ci 
* pitul' & ſucceſſoribus ſuis, ut predict if 
in proprios uſus ſuos abſque aliqua preſenuſ 
* tione nominatione inductione five admiſſiot 
alicujus incumbentis aut aliquorum incunf 
* bentium ad eandem Eccleſiam extunc mp 
* fterum fiend” prout per eaſdem Litteras pr 
5 rentes inter alia plenius apparet, Quarunf 
* quidem Litterarum Patent' pretextu 11den ; 
* Decanus & Capitulum fuer” ſeiſit' de ada 
* catione predict ut de uno groflo per ſeu 
© de feodo & jure in jure Ecclefie Cathedralff 
* fue predict', Ipſiſque Decano & Capitulo 
© inde ſeiſit exiſten pred” J. S. ſexto die Noven 
© bris Anno Regni pred' Regis E. ſexti quan 
apud B. predict' obiir, per cujus mortem E 
* Clefia predic” vacavit per quod iidem Dec 
nus & Capitulum immediate poſt mortem ej 
© dem J. S. Perſone ejuſdem Eccleſie extiteru 
& predict Rectoriam & Eccleſiam de B. pt 
© di& in proprios uſus ſuos tenuerunt & aghi 
tenent ac inde adtunc & immediate ſemp 
* poſtea fuerunt & adhuc ſunt ſeiſit in Dom 
* Nico ſuo ut de feodo in jure Eccleſie Cath 
* dralis fue predict & poſt mortem predit 
J. S. predictꝰ nuper Rex E. ſextus preſent: 
vit predict W. T. ut Clericum ſuum ad F 
cleſiam predict, Que quidem preſentatio a 
* miflio & inſtitutio ejuſdem W. ad eandemi 
* narr* predict' ſuperius ſpecificat vacua & nv 
ius effectus in lege fuei eo qd? predict * 
9 8 EB Clel 


r E 
cl! 


Bar in Quare Impedit. avg 

t clefia adeunc plena ſuit de prefat' Decano & 
© Capiculo, Et hoc parar' ſunt verificare, Un- 
© de pet' judicium ſi predict' T. B. Actionem 
ſuam predict' verſus eum habere debeat, &c. 

Et predict T. B. quoad predi& placicum 
predict Epiſcopi ſuperius placitat' ex quo 
idem Epiſcopus nichil clamat in Eccleſia pre- 
© dik' neque in advocatione ejuſdem niſi ad- 
miſſionem inſtitutionem & deſtitutionem 
perſonarum ad eandem Ecclefiam ut illius 
Ordinarius petit Judicium & Breve Epil- 


copo, &c. Ideo cons eſt ꝗd' predict' T. 


tecuperet preſentationem ſuam verſus pre- Judic' inde 
ſatꝰ Epiſcopum ad Eccleſiam predict' & has vers' Epiſco- 


beat Breve eidem Epiſcopa qa” non obſtante Pam. 


* reclamatione ipſius Epiſcopi idoneam per- 


ſonam ad Eccleſiam predictam ad preſen- 
W © tcationem ipſius T. admittat, &c. Et nichil 


de miſericordia ipſius Epiſcopi quia ſe ex- 
cuſat de impedimento, &c. Sed ceſſet inde Sed ceſſet 
© executio quouſque predict placitum inter Executio quo. 
© eundem T. & prefat' Decanum & Capitu- due, &cc. 
{ lum terminetur, &c. Et quoad predict' pla- 
* citum predictorum Decani & Capituli ſupe- 
* rius in barram placitat' idem T. dic' qd' pia- 
* citum illud minus ſufficiens in lege exiſtic ad 
© ipſum T. ab Actione ſua predict' verſus eoſ. Demurr* ad 
dem Decanum & Capitulum habend? pre- Placitum De- 
© cludend', qd'q; ipſe ad placitum illud modo & c, &c. 
* forma predict placitat neceſſe non habet neg 
per legem terte tenetur reſpandere, Et hoc 
© parat' eſt vetificate, Unde pro deſectu fuf- 
* fien' placiti in hac parte fact' idem T. pet? 
judicium & Breve Epiſcopo, &c. | 
Et predict” Decanus & Capitulum ex quo Joinder in 
ipſi ſufficien' materiam in lege ad predi&' Demurrer. 
J. ab Actione ſua predict verſus eos ha- 
| | 1 { bend” 


459 


Def”. 


Judic' pro 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 


© bend' precludend' ſuperius allegaver quam 


c 
c 
c 
c 
C 
0 
c 
C 
. 

c 
£ 
Cc 
c 
c 
0 
c 
o 

c 
c 
c 
c 
c 
c 
. 
C 
(9 


ipſi parati ſunt verificare quam quidem mate · 


riam predi&' T. non dedic' nec ad eam ali. 


qualit* reſpond” ſed verificationem illam ad. 


mittere omnino recuſat iidem Decanus & 


Capitulum petunt judicium & qd' predict 


T. ab Actione ſua predi&' verſus eos habend” | 


precludatur, 8&c. Et quia Juſtic' hic ſe advi- 


a) * * - hs on 


fare volunt, de & ſuper premiflis priuſquam [| 


judicium inde reddant dies dat? eſt partibus Þ 


predictis hicuſque a die Paſche in quindecim 
dies de audiendo inde judicio ſuo eo qd 
iidem Juſticiarii hic inde nondum, &c. Ad 
quem diem hic ven” tam predict? T. quam 


predict Decanus & Capiculum per Attorn' 
ſuos predict, Et ſuper hoc viſo predicto pla- 
cito predict Decani & Capituli ſuperius in 


barram placitat' & per Juſtic? hic plenius in. 
tellecto videtur eiſdem Juſticiar hie qd? pla- 


citum illud ſufficiens in lege exiſtit ad pre. 


dict T. ab Actione ſua predictꝰ verſus pre- 
dict Decanum & Capitulum habend' pre. 


cludend', Ideo cons eſt qd” predict: T. ni- Þ 


Chil capiat per Breve ſuum predi& fed fit in 
mia' pro flo? clamore ſuo, Et qd' predict 
Decan' & Capitulum eant inde fine die, &. 
Hill, 17 Eliz. Rot. 95 2. 


Vide Raſt. Ent. 497, &c. Plows, 494. 


Epiſcopus nichil clam niſi ut Ordinarius, 


and ſpecial Impediment ſhewn. 


* Piſcopus nichil clam” niſi ut Ordina- 


C 


c 


rius, Unde per” judic' ſi predict' H. 


Action ſuam predict' verſus eum abſq; ſpe- 


c 


ciali impediment” in perſona ſua aſſign' ha- 
bete debeat, &c. | 


The 


A * K A * *** «= * — * 


0 


: 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 
© The Plaintiff for à ſpecial Impediment ſhews, 


wc That be 3 and the Biſhop refuſed to admit 


his Clerk, Et ſic idem Epiſcopus ſimul cum 


4 predict J. B. &c. ipſium H. ad Eccleſiam ill 
predict' preſentare injuſte impedivit, Et hoc 
parat eſt verificare, Unde pet' judicium & 


3 
Cc 


A *© ov 


o© 


dampna occaſione Impediment' ill ſibi ad- 
judicari, &c. | 

Et predict Epiſcopus dic' ꝗd' predict' H. 
per predict” ſpeciale impedimentum vers' ip- 
ſum {uperius Align Actionem ſuam predict 
vers? eum habere non debet, Quia dic'qd?, &c. 
And ſo ſhews that the Church was Iitigious, and 
be gave the Plaintiff Notice, and would have 
awarded Jure Patronatus, if required; that 
none requir'd it, and that therefore after Six 
Months contulit per lapſum, prout eidem 
Epiſcopo bene licuit, Que omnia & ſingula 
idem Epiicopus parat' eſt verificare, Unde 
pet judic' ſi predict H. Action ſuam predi&” 
verſus eum ratione predict' ſpecial' Impedi- 
ment” in perſon” ipſius Epiſcopi ſuperius aſ- 
ſign' habere debeat, &c. 

Et predict' H. proteſtando non cogn' ali- 
qua per predict Epiſcopum ſupetius placi- 


491 


Rep). 


Rejo', De Ec- 
cleſia exiſten? 
litigioſa, & 
de Jure Pa- 
tronatus. 


Surrejo' & 
Demurter. 


tand' allegat', dic qꝗd' ipſe ad predict' placi- 


tum ipſius Epilcopi modo & forma predict 
ſupei ius placitat' neceſſe non habet nec per 
Legem terre tenetur reſpondere, Per quod 
pet judic ium & Breve Metropolitano unacum 
dampnis, &c. fibi adjudicari, &c. 

Et predict Epiſcopus ex quo iple ſufficien' 
mate lam in lege in barram Actionis predict 
HH ratione predict” ſpecial' impediment? in 
perſona iplius Epilcopt ſuperius aſſign' ha- 
bend” foperius placitavit, quam idem Epiſco- 


pus parat” elt verificare, quam quidem mate- 


iam idem II. non dedic nec ad eam aliqua- 
* licer 


Joinder in 
Dcmurr?. 


2 n 
** MILE 


—— 4 
DIE "OT 8 
B  IS 


23 2 
nicdw IC. e* LY 
_ 4 — * 1 ba 1 7 Cx 1 
1 PDD Mey Loo ax *P.1 


— — 
2 : FER — 
—— — ü 


. 


* * 6 


ATE ae. ST 
(4 e „ 
2 + 9m. by = ” of = 


—_— RS. 


Ws, , 
ww 
£43 25 


«af 3 — 


492 


Judic' pro 
Def ſur De- 
murr”, 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 


© liter reſpondet fer verification” ill! admittere 
© omnino recuſat pet” judicium & qd' pred' H 
ab Actione ſua predict' vers' eum habend 
precludatur, &c. Et quia Juſtic hic nondum 
* adviſantur de Judicio ſuo ſuper placito pre. 
* did' reddend' dies inde dat eſt ram prefat 
H. quam predict Epiſcopo hic a die Paſche 
in xv. dies ad audiend' inde judicium, &c. E 
© And ſo the Plea was continued uſque, &c. Ad * 
© quem diem hic ven' tam predict H. quam ©! 
« predict? Epiſcopus per Attorn' ſuos predi&' i) 
Et ſuper hoc lectis & per Juſtic' hic pleniu cl 
© intellectis placito & Record” predict? videtur ¶ le 
© eiſdem Jultic' hic qd dictum placitum pre- P* 
© dict' Epiſcopi modo & forma predi&' pet P. 
© iplum placitat' ſufficiens eſt in Lege ad pre. Pe 
© dit H. ab Action' ſua predict' vers ipſum ac 
Epiſcopum habend' precludend', Per quod F 
« Cons? eſt qd' predict” H. nichil capiat pet 15 
Breve ſuum quoad predict' Epiſcopum ſed 5 
« fie in mia' pro falſo clamore fuo vers' eund d 
« Epiſcopum, & idem Epiſcopus eat inde ſine E. 


die, &c. Vide Raft. Em. 511, 512. q _ 
© Vide aliter de Jure Patronat', Ra. En. g me 
* 509, 512. Winch. Ent. Joz. pr. 


Note, As for Remedy, if 2 Clerk be 0 
preſented, and the Biſhop refuſe to admit I 
him, c. and of Duplex Querela & Jure Pa- pe 
tronatus, vide the Clergy- Man Law, or the; * 
Compleat Incumbent, Chap. 21. 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 493 


Epns mil clamat niſi ut Ordinarins, Clicur 
placitat ad Exit. 


TI predict Epus' per T. S. & predict L gveſque 
15 J. per E. F. Attorn ſuos ven & de- claim' Riens 
ſend' vim & injur' quando, &c. Et idem mes come 
Epus' dic qd” ipſe nihil habet nec habere cha- Ordinarie. 
wat in Eccleſia predicta nec in Advocatione 
ejuldem niſi Admiſſionem, Inſtitutionem, & 
Deſtitutionem per ſonarum ad eandem Ec: 
cleſiam, Et cetera que ad Ordinatius perti- 
nent ut Eccleſie illius Ordinarius. Et hoc 
parat' eſt verificare, unde petit judiciu* fi 
„predict R. abſq; ſpeciali Impedimento in 
perſona ipſius Epi' in hac parte aſſignand' 
actionem ſuam predict' verſus eum habere 
a Lebeat, &c. Et predict J. B. dic! ꝗd' pre · Le P. rſon 
dict R. Action' ſuam predictam verſus eum plede qd' le 
babere non debet, Quia dic qd? predicta Ec. Eſgliſe eſt 
q Jeſia plena & conſulta fuit & adhuc eſt de ome: 
preſat' J. B. ex preſentatione predict' Hen 
rici nuper Comitis Suſſex', ac fuit die impe. 
trationis brevis Of iginalis ipſius R. & per lex 
menſes tunc prox? proceden', Abſq; hoc qd' INE 0 
predicta Eccleſia vacavit modo & formiprout e 
predict' R. per narr' ſuam predictam ſuperius 
| ſuppon?, Et hoc parat' eſt verificare unde 
petit judiciu? ſi predict' R. Action' ſuam 
| predict? verſus eum habere debeat, &c. 
Et predict R. quoad predict' placitum 
predict' Epi' ex quo idem Epus' nihil clamat 
in Eccleſia predict', neq; in Advocation' 
ejuldem, niſi ut loci illius Ordinarius, petit 77 
ljudiciu* & breve, Epo', &c. Io' cons' eſt % . _ 
qd' predict” R. recuperet verſus prefat' Ep'm ve 
I preſentationem ſuam ad Eccleſiam 3 
” Ot 


1 


494 Bar in Quare Impedit. 
© Et habeat breve eidem Epo' qꝗd' non . 

5 ſtante reclam' ipſius Epi' idoneam perfonanf 

© ad Eccleſiam predictam ad preſentatione 

Ceſſer execu- predict R. admittat, Et ceſſet inde Ex: 
wes © cuco' quouſq; predict' placitum inter ipluni 
R. & prefat J. B. terminetur ; Et quo 

© predi& placitum predict” J. ſuperius placitaff 

idem R. dic' qd' ipſe per aliqua per eundenfifi 

Replication * J. ſuperius placitando allegat ab actione (ul 
IEſglicevaca. © predict” hend* precludi non debet, Quia u 
vit modo & © prius dic qd' Eccleſia predict” vacavit mod 
forma, &c. & forma prout ipſe idem R. per narratione 
© ſuam predictam ſuperius ſuppon'. Et ho 
© petit ꝗd' inquiratur per Priam', Et pre didi 
J. B. filiter?, lo quoad triand” exit' iſtu' ſup: 
© rius ad Priam' triand' junct', precept' eſt Vic 
© qq Venire fac' hic a die fci' Martini in qui 
© decim dies duodecim, &c. Per quos, & 
Et qui nec, 8c. Ad recogn', &c. Quia tau 
* &c. Vide Co. Ent. 265. 


Ve' fa agard. 


Bar per Inſufficiency en Literature. 


| 3 
Bar. 6 # Nig Biſhop claims nothing only as Ow 
| dinary, and that the Church is a Here. 
nefice with Cure, &c. And that the Plaintif cat 
after the Death of O. preſented to him onf(art 
Hodder, who was a Perſon inſufficient in Lib 
rature, c. whereupon he refuſed to adi tl 
him, and afterwards gave Notice thereol i ſai 
the Plaintiff ; and he had not preſented an 
Collation by Other Perſon to him, thereupon he collated 
the Biſbop. the Defendant Hayman, &c. and the Deteli8 
dant Hayman the Incumbent pleads the fan 
Plea. Rep”, And as to the Plea of the BiſhoyP. 
Rep!' Rejo' ſays, that Hodder, at the Time of the Preſent 
lurrejo', &c. tion, &. was, and is, Vicar of U. and af 
Examination had obtain d Epiſcopal OrqÞe 

nan 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 495 
Inance, c. And he pleads the ſame Matter 
as to the Plea of the Incumbent : The Biſhop 
and Incumbent by ſeveral Rejoinders main- 
iin their Plea, Surrejoinder maintains the Repli- 
Nation, and tenders ſeveral Iſſues; and the Bi- 
op and Incumbent ſeverally demur, and the 
Plaintiff joins in Demurrer. Vide 2 Lut. 1094. 


il was in this Caſe argued for the Plaintiff, Argument pre 


What the Bar was coo general, in ſaying, That Sser', that 
ee Plaintiff's Clerk, fuit miuus ſuſſicien in lite- the Bar was 
ara non capax ad habend Eccles, not ſhewing 29 general. 
en herein he was inſufficient or incapable 3 and 
e 5 Co. Specot's Caſe, was cited, That Schi, 
a aticss inveteratus is inſufficient, not ſhewing 
herein he was Schiſmaticnus, To which it was 
ſwer' d, That there are ſeparatim ſeveral parti- 
lar Things which will make a Schiſmatick, 
ad any two by the Temporal Law, as Non. 
Wonformity, not reading the Articles by Acts 
Parliament, and triable by Common Law, 
ers by the Cannon Law, and ſome of the 

Rnons not receiv'd in England: And there. 
? e, in the Caſe of a Schiſmatick he ought to 
 OffEw wherein, fo that the Court may judge 

a reof: But Sufficiency in Literature is a com- 
intiated Matter, conſiſting of divers Sorts of 
| onffſarning to make a Man fit to be a Divine, 

LiWwhich the Temporal Courts are not Judges, 
dn the Metropolitan only, as it is agreed in If Illiterate. 
of i ſaid Specots Caſe ; and Illiterateneſs is there on qr 
d anffeed to be a good Cauſe of Reſuſal, and full. 
ed i Pleadings, as in this Caſe, have been ap. 
Deſelbved of, as Trin. 3 Eliz. C. B. Rot, 906. 

(amſ%. 6 El. C. B. Rot. 646. Mich. 15, 16 Elix. 

ino. Rot. 194. which Rolls were brought into 

ſent, and thereupon all the Juſtices, Nevel, judgment 
| aft and Rokeby, (no Chief Juſtice being then pre Be 
Orqe after the Death of Pollexfer) held the 


anc Plea 


496 Bar in Quare Impedit. - 


Plea good, Sed adjornatur ulterius ArguendunW 
But. after- - And afterwards Treby being made Chiet Juſt: 
wards pre upon another Argument the Plea was adjudgef 
_ inſufficient by the whole Court; Levis for tl 
Defendant, and Pemberton for the Plaintiff 
Affirmed in Whereupon a Writ of Error was brought if 
Error. Banco Regis, and the Judgment affirm'd : Bl 
ö aſterwards, upon a Writ of. Error brought i 
Bur again te. Parliament, it was revers'd, and the Plea af 
verſed, judged good by all the Lords in Parliamaff 
See the Report, 3 Levinz 313, 314 P 
Vide the Clergy-man's Law, Chap. 20. Wi 

are Cauſes ſufficient for the Biſhop to refuſe 1 
Clerk preſented, I 


id L'Ordinarie Et ptedict' Epus' & J. S. per —— | 
demur ſuc le © torn” ſuum ven' & defend' vim & injur” qui 
Count. «© gg, &c. Et idem Epus'sdic' qd? predi 
KR. & E. Actionem ſuam predict' verſus eu 
© habere non debent, quia dic' qd' narraq 
© predict modo & forma predictis decla 
ac materia in eadem content” minus ſuffici 
© in lege exiſtent ad ipſos R. & E. ad Adi 
ſuam predia? verſus ipſum Epum' her 
manutenend', qd'q; ipſe ad narr' illam mol 
© & forma predictis declarat' neceſſe non 
bet nec per legem terre tenetur reſpondeſ 
Et hoc parat' eſt verificare, Unde pro dell 
© lufficien' nart'ꝰ predictorum R. & E in 
* parte idem Epus petit judiciu', & qd' pi 
* dit” R. & E. ab Actione ſua predict veil 
| * eumhtend' precludantur, &c. , 

Le Parſon Et predict” J. S. dic' qd? ipſe eſt Pai 
plead en Bar, Eccleſie p edict' impetſonat' in eadem 
Preſentatione Domini Regis nunc, q 
1. ds : predict R. & E. Action ſuam predi&t' v 
Piaraficies. ſus eum habere non debent, quia dic qd 
* Statuto in Parliamento Domini Henrici! 


3 | 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 


per Regis Anglie Octavi, Anno Regni ful 
vicelimo pi imo apud Weſtm' in Com” Midd' 
tent“ edit“ inter alia inactitat, & ſtabilitu' 
exiſtat authoritate ejuſdem Parliamenti qa fi 
aliqua perſona five perſone hens vel hentes 
unem beneficiu cum Cura An' matum exi- 
ſten' annui valoris oft Libratum acceptaret 
& caperet ſive acceptarent & caperent all. 
quod aljud beneficiu' cum Cura Animarum 
& forer ſive forent inſticur' & induct' in pol. 
ſeſſionem ejuſdem, qd* tune & immediate 
poſt talem poſſeſſionem ſic inde habitum, 
primum beneficiu' adjodicaretur fore in lege 
vacuum, Et qꝗd' licitum foret cuilibet Patrono 
henti' advocationem ejuſdem preſentare unam 
aliam per ſonam, Et ꝗd' ipſe preſentat' heret” 
. ejuſdem in conſimilibus modo & 
orma quas Incumbens obiiſſet vel reſignaſſet, 
aliqua Licencia Unione vel alia Diſpenſa- 
tione in contrariu' inde obtent' non obſtan', 
prout per eundem Actum inter alia plenius 
apparet, Et idem J. S. ulterius dic' qd' bene 
& verum eſt qd' predict“ J. H. miles ſuit 
ſeiſit de predict Advocatione medietat' Ec- 
cleſie predictꝰ ut de uno groſſo per ſe ut de 
feodo & jure exiſten infra Dioces' Petribur- 


= alias de Burgo Sci” Petri, Et fic inde 


eiſi' exiſten' predict“ J. H. predicto viceſi- 


497 


mo die Auguſti, Anno Regni dict' Domini Confeſſe le 
H. nuper Regis Ang Octavi viceſimo ſupra- Grant de 
| dito apud W. predict per predict ſcriptu' procheine 


ſuum ſigillo predict J. ſigillatꝰ conceſſit prefat 
P. H. predict primam & proximam Advo- 
cationem predicte medietatis Eccleſie pred” pro 
pred prima & proxima vacatione ejuſdem me- 
dietatis Eccleſie illius cum primo & prox' per 
mortem, Reſignation', Ceſſion', Permutation', 
Privation', aut alio quocunque modo vacare 
contingeret, Virtute cujus Conceſſionis pre- 
K k dictus 


„ Autidance. 


=> Fe Ga . Ob oo rr curry Pt — onrays 
q — 0 4 " *%, ESTI — " 2 
3 
3 _ Ae; 


* - 
uo OS GA He PET 
Þ nn 


7 * a 


— 


* 
<6 We <ntiuf IE. Ze » 


CAR: * 


498 


Conceſſionem Advocation' predi&' pref 


Le Avoid. 
ance. 


Et ſe Preſent- 
ment. 


dict medietat Eccleſie predicte pro pri 
'© 8 proxim' Vacatione ejuſdem medietatis Eel 


Bar in Quare Impedit. | 
© dictus P. fuit de predicta Advocatione pr 


c clefie illius poſt predictam primam Coy 
© ceflionem Advocationis predicte prefat 
© in forma predict' fat poſſeſſionat', Et lh 
© inde poſſeflionar' exiſtenꝰ predictꝰ P. poſts 
c ſcilt predict' tertio die Maii Anno Regi 
© dit” nuper Regis H. Octavi viceſimo prin 
© ſupradicto apud W. predict' per pred 
© Scriptum ſuum ſigill' predict P. ſigillatꝰ cu 
© ceflit prefat' S. M. gen totu Statu', tity) 

© &intereſlſe ſua predictꝰ que predict' P. tui 
© habvit de & in Advocatione predict pill 
© predict” prima & proxim' vacatione pred 
© medietatis Eccleſie predicte poſt predid 


_ YES * a 8 29 — ** 


© P. in forma ut prefertur fact, virtute cul 
© Conceflionis predict S. fuit de predict AL 
© vocatione predict” medietatis Eccleſie pu 
* dit pro predit' prima & proxim' Val 
© tione ejuſdem medietatis Eccleſie illius pil 
© ſeflionat', predictoque S. ſic inde poſſeſſi 
* nat' exiſten', Eccleſie predicta quoad pr 
© dit” medietatem ejuſdem vacavit per mo 
tem predict E. C. tunc ultimi Incumbent 
© ejuſdem medietatis, qd'q; eadem vacai 
Eccleſie predictꝰ quoad eandem medietatel 
fuit prima & proxim' vacatio ejuſdem medi 
* tatis Eccleſie illius poſt Conceſſionem pi 
© dictam de Advocatione illa prefat P. Mi 
© per predict J. H. in forma predicta fail 
£ per quod predict S. de Advocatione pred 
© 1n forma predicta polleflionat? exiſtenꝰ, 
© Ecclefiam predictan ſic vacan' preſentai 
* prefat' E. B. Clicum' ſuum, quia ad preſe 
© tationem ipſius S. fuit admiſſus inſtitutus 
© inductus in eadem, tempore pacis, _ 

"6 


ny wy ors A > cc -- as x R <4 cc. 11 — es oe 3s 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 
WE dit nuper Regine Elizabethe prout predict 
R. & E. modo quer' per narration' ſuam 
predictam ſuperius ſuppon', Set idem J. S. 
ulterius dic? ꝗdꝰ predict Eccleſia de W. pre- 
dicto tempore quo predict E. B. fuit admiſſus 
inſtitutus & inductus in eadem & ſemper po- 
ſtea fuit & adhuc eſt beneficiu' cum Cura 
Animarum & annui valoris octo Librarum & 
amplius videlt undecim Librarum ſexdecim 
Denariorum & unius Obuli ſecundum taxatio- 
nem Decime adtunc & modo curren' prout 
in Recordo remanen' in Sccio' dict Domini 
Regis plenius liquet & apparet, Et qd' pre- 
dict E. B. habens predict' beneficiu' de W. 
poſt editionem Actus predict & ante diem 
impetrationis brevis Originalis predictorum 
R. & E. ſcilt' decimo Octavo die Decembris 
Anno Domini, &c. apud W. predict aliud 
Beneficiu' cum cura Animarum, viz. alteram 
medietatem predicte Eccleſie de W. in Dio- 
ces predict acceptavit cepit & habuit & 
in realem poſſeſſionꝰ ejuſdem alterius medie. 
tatis ejuſdem Eccleſie de W. predict. eiſdem 
Die & Anno apud W. predict' admiſſus inſti- 
tutus & inductus ſuit, pretextu quorum qui- 
dem acceptationis & captionis predict alterius 
ze beneficii predict” medietatis Eccleſie de W. 
predict' ſuperius ultꝰ mentionat' ac Admiſſio- 


edi 


2 nis Inſtitutionis & Inductionis predict E. B. 


in poſſeſſionem ejuſdem necnon vigore Sta- 


* 6 tuti predicti, predicta Eccleſia de W. in brevi 
gal & narr* predict ſuperius ſpec' quoad illam 


* mediecatem inde vacuit & fic vacans continu- 
* avit per duos Annos & amplius, nulla idonea 
* perſona infra tempus illud ad eandem medie- 
* tatem Eccleſie illius per Patronu' Ordinariu 
* ſeu Metropolitanu' ejuſdem medietatis Ec- 
* cleſie illius preſentat aut collar', per quod 

K 2 6 jus 


3 [ 
Wa) 


eſe 
us 


1p0 
did 


— — 


Averment de 
Beneficꝰ cum 
Cura Aiĩatu'. 


Accept? aut? 
Beneficie, 


. 


$06 Bar in QuareTmpedit 
* jus preſentandi idoneam perſonam ad em 
dem medietatem Eccleſie illius fic vacan Do 


3 mine Elizabethe nuper Regine Angl' ration 

| Deveigneal © Prerogative ſue accrevit, Et ea ratione' 2 
4 Roigne per © ipſam nuper Reginam Elizabetham idonean 
laps. / © perſonam ad predictam Eccleſiam de WI. 
q Ne © quoad predictam medietatem inde in bref” 
4 © & narr” predictis ſuperius mentionar' peri; 
© nuit preſentare, predictaque nuper Regia 
[ © Flizabetha poſtea & antequam ipſa aliquni - 
© idoneam perſonam ad eandem Ecclieſiam ui | 

© prefertur vacan preſentaſſet apud Weſtuff 

zin Com” Midd' obiit ſine hered* de Corpo © 
Diſcent del © ſue exeun poſt cujus mortem Regimen hu 
= | Realmeal © Regni Angl' deſcend? Domino Regi nunc 
] Roy. Conſanguineo & heredi pred' nuper Regime! 
4 © Eliz' per quod idem Dominus Rex nunc e 
1 1 © gimen, hujus Regni Ang! ſuper ſe ſuſcepiſ 
mW : © ac jam Rex hujus Regni Ang! exiſtit, & ll | 
4 © ratione ad ipſum Dominum Regem nunc u 
"1 © tione Prerogative ſue Regie idoneam pero 
CU © nam ad predictam Eccleſiam de W. quot © 
4 © predictam medietatem in brevi & narr” pi 
= dictis ſuperius mentionat ut prefertur vacu 
| tem pertinuit preſentare, per quod iden f 
4 © Dominus Rex nunc poſtea ſcilt decim f d 
i © tertio die Maii Anno Regni ſui Ane P 
W © &c. Sexto, per Literas ſuas Paten qui 4: 
1 idem J. S. ſubꝰ magno ſigillo ſuo Anglie hgh U 
© lat? hic in Cur' proſert, quarum dat eſt apuſ P 
1 © Weſtm' in Com' Midd' eiſdem Die & Ann N 
1 © ad eandem Eccleſiam (ic vacan' quoad ear N 
. Preſengment «dem medietatem inde pteſentavit ipſum J. P 
| per le Roy. 6 Clericum ſuum, qui ad preſentationem ipſiſ it 
© Domini Regis nunc fuit admiſſus inſtitutus fi 
induct' in eadem, tempore pacis, tempore dic fa 
© Domini Regis nunc, idemq J. Parſona Eccleff © 
* ilius quoad eandem medietatem inde adh A 


d exill 


* 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 


u exiſtit imperſonat' in eadem ut preſertur ex 


ME predicta preſentatione dicti Domini Regis 


nunc, Abſque hoc qd' pred' Eccleſia de W. 


alk uoad pred medietatem inde in narr” pred 
ni ſuperius ſpec vacavit per mortem predict? 


E. B. modo & forma prout predict” R. & E. 


uxor' ejus per narr' ſuam predictam ſupe- 
ius ſuppon', Et hoc patat eſt verificare, 
8 Unde petit judicium ſi predict R. & E. 
Action ſuam predict' verſus eum habere de- 
\ oF beant, &c. 3 
Et predict R. F. & Eliz. Uxot' ejus ex 
quo narratio predict“ ac materia in eadem 
os content” ſufficien in lege exiſt ad ipſos R. & 
eu E. ad Action ſuam predict' verſus preſat 
ne Epiicopum habend' manutenend' quam qui- 
gen dem materiam iidem R. & E. parat ſunt ve- 
p ifcare, ac quam quidem materiam predict 
re Epiſcopus non dedic nec ad eam aliqualit 
H telpond' ſet verification” illam admit' omnino 
o recuſat per? judicium & Breve Metropolitano 
eo qd predict Epiſcopus eſt pars & nofninat 
in Brevi Original ĩipſorum R. & E. &. 
Et quoad predict placitum predict J. S. 
ſuperius in barram placicat” idem R. & E. 
dicunt qd' ipſi per aliqua in eodeiij placito 
5 ab Action” ſua predict verſus pre- 
qu tr J. S habend' precludi non debent, Quia 
Hut prius dic' ꝗd' predict Eccleſia de W, quoad 
predict medietat' in narr' ſua predict ſupe. 
rius ſpec' vacavit per mortem predict” E. B 
modo & forma prout ĩpſi per narrationꝰ ſuam 
ptedictam ſupetius fuppon', Et hoc pet qd 
inquiratur per Patriam, Et predict' J. S. 
ſimiliter, Ideo precept' eſt Vic' qd”, Venite 
ſac hic a die Paſche in quindecim dies duo. 
decim, &c. Per quos, &c. Et qui nec, &c. 
Ad recogn', &c. Quia tam, &c. Et quia 
| | "oY Juſtic 


4 


501 


Travers un 
Voidance. 


Joinder en 
Demui rer 
ove el Ordi- 
narie, 


Replication” 
al Parſon & 
Iſſue ſur le 


Traverſe. 


J — — 


# 
8 2 * — - - > =; . E 
— - — — — 8 — EI - A * 
1 2 —_ — — - _ E — * PR . — * - 2 Backs of 2 4 
1 2 * — — wr >. cope 4 4 A * 2 1 2 a 2 — * — - p Ny FY 2 ; 3 Pa . 
. « . "DEI * Ga 3 A N FD * 1 * 1 % OG — * 
\ - - = at - - 
. j 17 — A g - ” o * „1 6 an — Loew o 
: \ * SA Pp * = pe ae RE? 1 ol * 
wh F t a _ G 


_—_—_— IT PEI _ » 
4 
-% 222 


4 


_—__ = _ = 
cw - 


13 
|. 
4 


$ 
Uh 
k 


- © decim, &. Ad recogn' informa predict, & 


3 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 
© Juſtic' hic ſe adviſare volunt de & ſuper pte 
© miflis unde predict R. & Eliz. uxor” ej vi 
predict Epiſcopus ſuper ius morantur in lei 
© priuſquam judicium inde reddant, dies d 
© eſt cam prefat' R. & E. quam prefat' Epiſcopyl 
© hic uſque ad prefat' terminum de audiend; 
© inde judicio ſuo eo qd iidem Juſtic' hic inc 
nondum, &c. Ad quem diem hic ven ta 
© predict”, R. & E. quam. predia' Epilcopus vl 
J. per Attorn' ſuos predictos, Et quoi 


b predict' Breve de Venite fac', Vic' non . 


© Breve, Ideo ſicut ptius ptecept' eſt Vie " 
© Venice fac hic in Cro* ſancte Trinitat' dif 


© Ec quoad predictam materiam in lege und 
© dic” R. & E. & prefat' Epiſcopus poſuer' i 
in judicum Curie, quia Juſtic hic ſe inde lf 
© vifare volunt dies ulterius dat” eſt tam pref 
R. & E. quam prefat? Epiſcopo hic uſque if 
© prefat' Terminum de audiendo inde judici 
© ſuo, eo qd' iidem Juſtic hic inde nondum, & 
Ad quem diem hic ven tam predi&? R. & 
quam pred Epiſcopus & J. per Attorn ſu 
1 n quoad pred Breve de Veni 
* faciend', Vic? non mis Breve, Ideo ſicu 
© plur precepr eſt Vie? qd' Venire fac? hic iff 
© Oktab' ſancti Michaelis duodecim, &c. Al 
* recogn' in forma predict', &c. Et quo 
© predia* materiam in lege unde predict] 
& E. & prefat' Epiſcopus poſuer” ſe in Jud 
© cium Cur* quia Juſtic' hic ſe inde adviſi 
© volunt dies ulterius dar' eſt tam prefat' R. 
E. quam predict Epiſcopo hic uſque ad pr 
© fat” Terminum de audiendo inde judicio ſi 
eo qd' iidem Juſtic' hic inde nondum, & 
© Ad quem diem hic ven' tam predict R. 
E. quam predit* Epiſcopus & J. per A 
© torn” ſuos predictos, Et ſoper hoc viſa nat 

A Sa | © ration 


— - 8 —— 8 
= ts ods a - A a Cs. ax 


re Bn K = „ a 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 503 
ratione predicta per Juſtic hic ac per eos 
plenius intellecta videtur eiſdem Iuſſic hic 
qd' narratio predict in forma predict' decla. 
W raca ac materia in eadem content minus ſuf. 
$ ficien' in lege exiſtunt ad ipſos R. & E. ad 
Actionem ſuam predictam verſus ipſum Epiſ. 
copum habend* manutenend' prout idem 
Epiſcopus ſuperius allegavit, Ideo cons' eſt 
d' predictꝰ R. & E. nihil capiant per Breve 
Fun predictum ſet ſint in mia' pro falſo cla- 
more ſuo Et predict Epiſcopus & J. eant 
inde ſine die, &c. Hill. 7 Fac. Rot. 3459. 
In Coi' Banco. Vide Co. Ent. 492, G c. 

1 Et predict Epiſcopus per — Attorn Leveſque 


uum ven & deſend vim & injur' quando, claime riens 
forſque come 


Ordinarie. 


mW &c. Et idem Epiſcopus dic qd' ipſe nihil 
habet nec aliquid habete clamat in Eccleſia 
predict” nec in Advocatione ejuſdem niſi ad- 
miſſionem inſtitutionem & inductionem per- 
ſonarum Eccleſie illius & cetera que ad Or- 
dinarium pertinent ut ejuſdem Eccleſie Or- 
dinarius, Et hoc parat eſt verificare, Unde 
petit judicium ſi predi&' J. C. abſque ſpe- 
ciali impedimento in perſona ipſius Epiſcopi 
in hac parte aſſignand' ation ſuam predictam 
I verſus eum habere debeat, &c. | 
Et predict' J. C. ex quo predict' Epiſcopus 

* nihil clam” in Eccleſia predict nec in advo- 
* catione Eccleſie illius niſi ut ejuſdem Eccleſie 
Ordinarius in forma predict pet' judicium 
& Breve Epiſcopo, Ideo cons eſt qd' pre- 
dict J. C. recuperet verſus prefatꝰ Epiſcopum 
* preſentationem ſuam ad Eccleſiam predictam, 
Et habeat Breve eidem Epiſcopo qd* non 
obſtan' reclam' ſua propria ad Eccleſiam pre- 
* dit” idoneam perſonam ad preſentationem 
* iplius J. C. admittat. &c. Et nihil de mia 
| K k 4 pre- 


* 
1 
J 


— —— 
— * 


— — 
DE”, —— 


= — 
— 
ny a_—_— 
— 


= > = 
. NE — — 
— — CART” 


predict N quia excuſavit fe & ven 
U 


Epiſcopus 
nichil clam” 
niſi ut Ordi- 
Darius. 


W. FE. placit 


qi ipſe eſt Vi- c 
Carius EX pre- c 
« 
c 


ſentatione 
Domini Re- 


gis, &c. 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 


* .primo die per ſum', &c. Set ceſſet executin 


inde quouſque placitum predict' inter ipſum 
J. C. & prefat' G. M. ter minetur, &c. 

* Trin, 6 El. Rot. 927. In Coi' Banco 
Co. But. 491. M 


Statute of Simony pleaded in 10 | IT 
per 


þ..* EI predict Epiſcopus & W. 
I. H. C. Att ſuum ven' & geſend' vin 
& injur' quando, Et idem-Epiſcopus die of 
* Vicaria predict” eſt infra Diaces' ſuam L & 
C. Qdq; ipſe nichil habet nec aliquid ha 
+ © bere clam” in. Vicaria predict' nec in advo. 
cation' e juſdem niſi admiſſionem inſtitutionenf 
& deſtitutionem perſonarum ad eandem Vi 
catriam & cetera que ad Ordinat' pertin u Whale 
loci ill Ordinarius, Et hoc patat eſt verif' Hut 
care, Unde pei' Judic' ſi predict' S. G. ab 
ſpecial' impedimento in perſona ipſius Epi 
copi in ea parte aſſignand Action? ſuam pte di 
dict vers eum habere debeat, &c. 
Et predict W. F. dic' qd ipfe eſt Vac m 
rius Vacat ie predict' ex preſentatione Do Hu 


L 
c 
c 
c 


mini Regis nunc, Et admiſſus inſtitur” & in 
duct' fuit in eadem ex preſentatione dic id 
Domini Regis nunc, Qd'q; predict' S. Actio te 
nem ſuam vers eum habere non debet, Qui p 
dic ꝗd' bene & verum eſt qd' predi& 85 
ſuit ſei de advocatione Vicarie predict p 
ut de uno groſſo per ſe ut de ſeodo &Ma 
Jure in Jure prebendie ſue predict', SedWi, 
idem W. E. ulterius dic qd” in Statut' ine 
Parliament Domine Eliz. nuper Regine 
Angl' 4 die Febr' Anno Regni ſui 31.“ 
[ 


c 
0 
6 
0 


oF 

apud Weſtm' in Com? Midd' tent! edit' int 
PAT, hy, | 

* al Inactitat' iuit Authoritate e juſdem Par 

e llamenti, 


( 


o 


Bar in Quare Impedit. gog f 
. menti, Qd' ſi aliqua perſona vel perſone þ 
'Wcorpora policica & corporat' ad aliquod tem- 
1 pus poſt finem 40 dierum prox” poſt finem 
We juſdem Seſſion Parliament” pro aliqua ſum- 
n monete munere dono proficuo five bene. 
cio directe vel indirecte aut pro ſeu ratione 
icajus promiſſionis agreamenti conceſſionis 
Obligationis Conventionis five al' Aſſurancie : 
c. (Aud ſo ſets forth the Act, and the corrupt The corrrupt 
ES mmiacal Agreement, much like as it is in a De. Agreement, / | 
mn lar at ion upon a Simoniacal Contract. Vide 2 Iuſtr. 
ck, 413.) Super quibus quidem corrupt” 
& Concordia & Agreament' predict Simoniace 
Nut preſertur fact” ac in per formation“ & exe- 
0. N cution cortuptꝰ Concord & Agreamentꝰ prey” 
m ptedictus S. poſtea ſcilt' 29 die Sept, 
i Regni dicti Domini Regis nunc zac ãpUd O. 
u Wale! predict” ad Vicariam Eccleſie predict' ſic 
"1 Wut prefertur vacan' preſentavit prefar? J. B. 
g Clericum ſuum qui ad preſentac' ill poſtea 
pil Wſcile” predict' 4 die Sept' Anno 32. lupra- 
e. dicto fuit de ſacto admiſs inſtitut & inductꝰ 
in eadem tempote pacis tempore dicti Do- 

ca Wmini Regis nunc, Poſteaque predict' J. B. in 
0 Hulteriorꝰ performation' & execution corrupt? 

in. & Simonac' Concordie & Agreament' pre. 
ich dia” fic ut prefertur fact' ſcilc' ad dies & 
tio ¶ tempora int eum & predict' S. proinde ut 
ia preſertur concordat & appunctuat' predict 

l. legalis monete Ang eidem S. & aliis Money paid 
ict perſonis per eum aſſignat' ad uſum ipſius S. thereon, 
CW apud O. predict” ſolvit & ſatisfecit ſecundum 
Sed MW formam effectum & intention' corrupt? Con- 
in cordie & Agreament' predict”, Ac ea ratione 
ne ac vigore predict” Statut' de Anno 31, pre- 

31. dict' nuper Regine Eliz. ſuper ut preſertur 

int N recitat', predictꝰ preſentatio predict? S. ad Vi- 
Par-W cariam Eccleſie predict” fic ut prefertur Si. 
anti, * moniace 


gos Bar in Quare Impedit: 
* * moniace ſact', Ac pred' Admiſſio inſtitutioff 
LN inductio ipſius J. B. in eadem Vicaria ſu- 
© perinde ut prefertur habit? & obtentꝰ' penitu 
© vacue ac nullius vigoris neque effectus in Lege 
* deve? & exiſtunt, eaque ratione':Eccleli:f 
By which the © predict” vacavit, Per quod ac vigore predict 
Church be-' * Statutj de Anno 31. predict nuper  Regine 
i n * Eliz. ad eundem Dominum Regem nun 
wanted — idoneam perſonam ad Eccleſiam Vacarief 
— predict' fic ut prefertur vacan' pro hoc tem 
. — & turno pertinuit preſentare, Ac idem 
Dominus Rex nunc poſtea ſcilt 12 die Juli 
Anno Regno ſui Angl' 3 5. eundem W. Ef 
* Clericum ſuum ad Vicariam predi& fic u 
© prefertur vacan' preſentavit prout ei ben 
kei, Idemq; W. F. ad predict prefzntatiafi 
dicti Domini Regis nunc fuit admiſs' inſtitu 
© & induct' in eadem tempore pacis tempo 
dicti Domini Regis nunc, Et Vicarius imper 


* ſonat' in eadem Vicaria ex preſentatione ill 

ante diem impetrac” Brevis Original” ipſius N 

And traverſes * fult & adhuc exiſtit, Abſq; hoc qd' Vicaii 

the Vacancy, © predict' vacavit per mortem predict”: J.] 

- 2; My © modo & forma prout per narr* predict' fu 

e akte © perius ſupponitur, Et hoc parat” eſt. verif 

© care, Unde per? judic' fi predict S. Actio 

© ſuam predia? vers' eum habere debeat, &c 

E. Lutwiche, 1 : 

© Vide Clifts Ent. 607, 608, Cc. 

bag © Vide ante, Et vide 1 Brown, 298. B. 
per Stat' de Simony. e 


a4 a 6 


bar in Quare Impedt. gf 


— 
- 


[Bo per Cauſe de Simony pleaded briefly. 


N EI pred? Epiſcopus per J. G. Attorn' 
L ſuum ven' & defend' vim & injur' 
quando, &c: Et dic? ꝗd' predict W. Action 
i] [now predict* vers eum habere non debet, 
J quia dic' qq' idem W. B. ante diem impe- 
trac Brevis Original” ipſius W. ſcilt' 20 die N. 
Anno Regni Domine Regine nunc 8. Apud J. L. preſent- 
F Civic” Nove Sarum in Com' predict' per Lit- ed by the 
teras ſuas ſigillo ſuo ſigillat' preſentavit eidem Plaintifl. 
Epiſcopo adtunc Ordinario Eccleſie predict | 
8 quendam J. L. Clericum ſuum, iplum Epiſ- 
ituß copum adtunc & ibm requirendo qd” ipſe 
or eund' J. L. ad Eccleſiam predict' tunc vacan 
admittere ac ipſum in eadem inſtituere & 
i induci facere dignaretur, Super quo predict 
J. L. adtunc & ibm' examinar de habilitate 
tam de moribus quam de ſcientia per eund' 
Epiſcopum utrum ipſe habilis & idonea per- 
fona fuit ad Eccleſiam predict' admittĩ necne, 
Et quia idem J. L. ante preſentat' predictꝰ But was refu- 
ſupet ius ſpec? per Simoniam apud W. preg” ſed to be ad- 
„ obtinuit de predict W. B. Rectoriam de V. S. greg. 
in Com predict', idem Epiſcopus eund J. L. mony, &. 
ad Eccleſiam predict' admittere & inſtituere ; 
B adtunc & ibm recuſavit prout ei bene licuit, 
Et ulterius idem Epiſcopus dic ꝗdꝰ quecunqʒ 
perſona aliquam Rectoriam vel Vicariam per 
Simoniam obtinet, non eſt per Jura Ecclefia 
capax alicujus talis beneficii Dignitatis Re. 
ctorie ſive Vicarie; Et hoc parat eſt verifi- 
care, Unde per judic' ſi predict W. Action 
Buam predict vers' eum habere debeat, &c. 


E 


vn. . : eng ds =_ 


* qe Y 2 „ „„ AR 


- . re Fo we Wh IS — — * _— —_ 
— - 4 4 > p= lf 2 2 
7 * — 4 — . n 4 * + 8 
won * , 1 4 a. © 
— 7 Fn L. St ES . 
- % ad - - I 
» Sw do oem nod. ds; om or tr ˙ Ü 


r 
4 x 
„ 


508 Bar in Quarc Impedit 
Repł as to Et predict W. dic' qd' ipſe per aliqu 
the Simony. © preallegat?. ab Actione ſua predict” habendf 

* precludi non deber quia dic qꝗdꝰ predict' J. L 
ante preſentac' fact? non obtinuit de eo 
W. B. pred' Rectoriam de V. S. per Simoni 
prout predict Epiſcopus alleg', Et hoc pe 


6 
gꝗd' inquiratur per Patriam, Et predict Epilcoiſ x 
* pus ſimilit', Ideo xii, &c. T. 9 El. Rot 10305 

* Vide Raf. Ent. 531. & vide Co. Ent. 476, 
E 

References to many other Pleadings in 

Quare Impedit. - 
Vacancy per . Lericus placitat qd” ipſe eſt Vicariuf ö 
Statut de 5 impetſonat' ex preſentatione Domini ; 
Pluralities. Regis, Unde nan intendit qd' Dominus Ralf 1 
© ipſum imperere velit, Et ꝗqd' Vicaria vacaif a 
per Statut de. Pluraſities & per lapſum tem 4 
© poris devolut' pertinet A. pteſentare qui pte 2 
| c {entavit Def * Wincb. Ent. 712, 779. 7. 
Simile ce /. Defendant pleads the Statute of Hen 0 
Lapſe to the to Pluralities, againſt taking "Iwo Benefice Di 
King. and intitles by Lapſe to the King, Bro. Met. 33 g 
Simile, Placit. Gen. 485. Vide poſtea oc 
Diſcent, . . Diſcent pleaded from HF. & to Quealſ 
Roy al:Royn. Elizabeth. Winch. 266. 7 


30 2 if, Simile, from H. 8. to King Fames. Bri x; 
de des 377, Cc. Winch. Ent. 697. Vide Win ſ 
Rep. 13. 
Vacavit per I" * Ecdleſia vacavit per reſignationem P. 9 
Reſignatio - © Citat', Winch. 6 32, Cc. 646. Placit. Gen. ve 
nem. © Winch, Ent. 748, 787, Oc. 793, 730. Bill 
© Vad. 3.44, Ce. |: 
| Sirgile, Per Fine and Surrender, Bro, RY | 
div. 413. * 


(91 


{ Y 9 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 506 


Concerning Preſentations by Turns. 


=” < 


AR concern” preſentation” per Tur- 
k 6 


| nos & Vices, &c. Vide Winch. Ent. 

630, 632, 652, 703. Co. Ent. 475, 497. Bro. 
Red. 617. 2 Lut, 1091, Sec. Winch, Ent. 761. 
Bo. Red. 408, G. 


| Simile, by Uſurpation and Simony, &c. 


„ © Uſurpatio ſuper Regem placitat', &c. 
Co. Ent. 475, 489. Winch. 691. Hob. 327. 


2 Brown. 266. Bro. Cad. 377, Oc. 1 
arg f 


ou /. * Ulurpatio ſuper Reginam, Mincb. | BY 
mn En. 187. : 34 
J. © Concernen' Bar per Ulurpation' ſuper | 1 

a'. Vide Raſt. Ent. 533. Co, Ent. 475, "230 


WW 495, 497. Placit. Gen, 475, Cc. Bro. Red. 625. 

n Bro. 236. Winch, Ent, 718. Hob. 237. Winch, 

743, 761. 

J. Bar per Simonie per Clericum qui eſt gimony 
perſona imperſonat' ad preſentation Do. traverſed. 
mini Regis. Repl', Qd? W. bona fide 
conceſſit prox*,Advocation', Et traverſat? Si- 

wel moniacum contractum, Exit inde, Et Judic' 

pro Def ad Aſſias ſuper Veredicto. Winch, 

Ext. 775. Hob. 165. | 

Val . * Qu Imp? pro Rege ſuper Stat' de Si- gimite. 
monia, Bar per Patronum, Qd' ipſe pura 

ſponte, &c. preſentavit Clericum, Et tra- 
＋verſat' dimoniacum contractum, Clericus pla- 

citat' idem Placitum, & exit ſuper ambobus. 

2 Brows, 219. | 

. * Similis Placitum & ſimilis Traverſia per 
Ulericum, 2 Brown. 222. 


Cor 3 Pro 


FF 


%. 9 * | 4 9 
510 Bar in Quare Impedit. | 
Upon a Va- FN. Pro Rege, &c. Patronus & Clericylf 
cancy by © conjunctim placitant qd' R. pure, &c. pre 
— Flu- © ſentavit Clericum, Et qd* Patronus poſſe 
© ſionat exiſten de Advocatione virtate Brei 

© um de Extent” & Liberate ad Eccleſiam vl 

© can' preſentavit, Et Eccleſia modo vacaif 

© per Stat” de Pluralities, Patronus preſentariiſ 
Sunony tra- a' Def. Et travers' Simoniacum Contra 
verſed. © int R. & ejus Clericum, Et Iſſue inde 
© Win. Ent. 712. Vide Hob. 167. | 


Simony par- . © Pardonac* Simonie placitat' poſt ult * 
* Continuanc & Demurr inde. Id. Mf, 
c x 

Fc! 


That the laſt /. © Per Clicum', qd” eſt perſona imperl 


r © nat' ex preſentatione Domini Regis, Et qi 
Eledion ult' Incumbens poſt edition Act pro reſtagy, 


which Bene. © Tatione Miniſteriorum non fec' aliquan 

fice he would © electionem utrum beneficiorum retinere c 

retain. © let, infra tempus convenien' ſcilt', &c. Pall 
© quod Dominus Rex ante conceſſionem pf 
eum fat Domino B. preſentavit Def? Di 
© murr' inde. Winch. Ent. 7526. 

Plenarty per . © Per Clicum' proteſtando qd Domin 

kx Menſes. Rex non fuit ſeit” in jure Ducar' Lanc', pll 
* placito qq* idem Rex prefentavit ipſum, } 
© qq Eccleſia ſuit plena de eo per ſex ment 
© ante Orig' pros', Et Demurr inde. Id. 7 7 


pon the Statute of Pluralities pleaded. 


Recital and . T* Quare Imtedit, for the Queen, up or 


Avoidance the Statute of Pluralities to preſent | 
in Quere In. the Church of Chalfont, reciting the Stat. a 
peair, Cc. FB 8. cap. 13, And that M. Biſhop of Lina "* 

being ſeized of the Advowſon, collated Greg... 
Garth, who being qualified accepted of H 


tbemſted, and afterwards accepted Wallingfi ok 
and fo Chalfont became void. Vide 2 Lat, 10 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 511 

Bar, conſeſſing that the Biſhop of L. was Bar. 
"Wſcized of C. and collated G. G. which G. was 
"Wqualified, and accepted H. but afterwards, 
il and before G. was induced, the Biſhop was Biſhops tran- 
""Szanſlated to V and T. ſucceeded him, and lated, &. 
What G. afterwards accepted . and the ſaid T. 

he Biſhop collated one Ince, That T. the 
Wiſhop was tranſlated to V. and that the 
iſhop now Defendant fuccceded him; 
bat the Church of C. was void by the Death... and 
ol Ince, and the Biſhop collated the Defendant Collation. 
Land that he had been Parſon for Six Months, 
"nd more: Idem 1086. And here the Repor- 


Mi after the two Years incurr'd, after the Þ 


I 


nt, and he died Incumbent, the Queen had 
V pot her Preſentation; and cites 2 Cro. 216, 
umber againſt the Biſhop of Chicheſter and 
ren, 3 Cro, 44. Beverly vers Cornwall 119. 
de Queen againſt the Biſhop of L. Ce. 


Wb. 152. 


7 Vbſervations upon the Statute of Pluralitzes. 


ded. JO W to plead the Statute of 21 H. 8. 

of Pluralities, as to the Commencement 

VP Wereof, vide 1 Lut. 140. A. 

lent Where it is neceſſary that in Pleading it Yeatly Va. 
ate Fall be alledged, That the firſt Benefice, at the lue. 
Li""ime of accepting of the ſecond, was of the 

G"HYearly Value of 8 J. Id. 1 305. b. 

E That the Value ſhall be taken according to How taken 
lingf e Kings Books, ibid. and the Words of the 

. 10 Cannon 


512 Bar in Quare Impedit. 

Voidance. Canon of the Council of Lateran; and where 
how, and to what Purpoſe, a Church is void 

by that Canon. 1d. 1306. 
Simile, Where the Church is void, as to a Strange 
before Deprivation. 14. 1307. 
Where if the Where if the King preſent, or Biſhop col] 
King or Bi- late by Lapſe, not having any Title of Lapk; 
ſhop preſent if ſuch Preſentee is perfect Incumbent as t 
without Offerings, Tythes, Cc. altto' the Parſonag 
* is not gain'd thereby. Id. 1307. and when 
| Notice is requiſite in ſuch Caſe, ibid. & 1305 
Demurter to In 2 Lat. 1645. Acton ver“ Epm, Sari 
a Patron's Brown, and Sherwin, & ibw 1663, upon 
P c and Demurrer to the Plea of the Patton Brom 
Traverſe. Ez qd” placitum ill eſt incertum duplex && car 
2 forme feilt in traverſando predic” W. ducen 
Nepotem predic Ducis primo ment ionat ful 
ſeit de Advocat ione predict ut de feodo talliai 
It is obſerved, That there is a grand Pr 
lixiey in the Count; for after that thereby 
Ne need of is alledg'd, That Edward Earl of Herifn 
Prolixity. was ſeized for the Term of his Life, all 
Remainders over are exprels'd at lat 
of which there is no need; but it had bet 
better if they had been conciſely expreſs'd þ 
ſuch Words, viz Remaneria inde modo & fim 7 


prout preantea limitat ſpectan', Or by Words! 
that Effect. 


Diſcent and /. Patronus coꝑn Action”, Clicus' pla 
Traverſe. © ext” qd' pater Patroni obiit ſeit' de Advo 
* tione que diſcend' Patrono qui preſenta c 

* Def', Et travers qu? pater conceſſit pro 

; Advocation' Quet' & Exit' inde. 3x 6 

oo. 

Pleaand Tra- * . Per Clicum' cogn' partem Narr, Ic 
verſe, di Yu. placitat' qd acra terre ad quam, &c. diſcen 
Os R. qui dimiſit patrono, qui preſentavit De 
[1 


Bar in Quare Impedit. 513 
Et travers qd? ult vacaco? fuit prox” & prima 
© yacaco' poſt legacon, patronus Demur* ad 
* placitum, Winch. Ent. 768. 

f. * Patronus & Clicus' jungunt, Et placitant Traverſe of 
© qq' T. feir de Advocatione legavit Patrono, the Legacy, 
MW «© qui preſentavit al' Def', Et travers qd' T. Cc. 
© legavit quer', Et Iſſue inde. 


I ſhall add no more upon this Head, but References. 
further refer you to the two general Tables of 
Mr. Townſend and Mr. Cornwall; alſo to 
LE Raſtal's Entries, Coke's Entries, &c. where you 
may find full Directions to each Particular of 
E Declarations, Bars, Pleadings, and Judgments, 
W neceflary in this Action. | 
env And for full Inſtructions, as to the Matters The Clergy« 
fulWof Pleading and Obſervations on this Head, I Man's Law. 
alias take the Book, Entituled, | The Clergy- Mans 
pu Law, Or, The Compleat Incumbent | to be the 
eby Wlateſt and beſt Extant; it was lately reprinted 
ertfaWin 1712. in Two Volumes in Octavo, the Con- 
all tents of the Chapters whereof (moſt material 
lan ſor our Purpoſe) are as follow; wherein alſo 
d bee ſeveral other foregoing Matters will appear. 


[The CONTENTS of ſeveral Chap- 
ters contained in the Two Volumes 


of the Clergy-Mar's Law, &c. 
pla 
\dvo OIL. LI 
ſentil Chap. I. Enefices, by bat Means they become 
B void, Of Voidance, by —— Act of 
1 Cd. From what Time Lapſe ſhall incur upon 
ſuch Avoidance,” Page I 
Chap. II. Voidance by Ceſſion, by Canon, and by 
: Statute Law; and of the ſeveral Effects of ſuch 
it De Avoidances. Benefices incompatible. —— Wh 
» L 1 Chap, * 


Chap. V. Church void by Ad of Law. 


Chap. III. Of Pluralities, Qualificat ious, Di. 
penſat ions and Commendams, 10 


'Chap. IV. Of Reprations, and kale 
0 þ 
Chap. VI. Church void by taking Orders, Al. 


Chap. VII. Of Advowſons, and Right of P 


Chap. IX, Right f Preſentation, by wh 


Chap. XIII. Of Uſurpation, and the ſever 
— of Advowſon, EET 


The Contents of the 
fs 
1 

Benefices, 49 


0 
Simony, &c. | 


miſſion, Inſtitution, &c. Simomacally; or full 
not ſubſcribing the Articles, &c. And of De 
pri vat ion. 02 


tronage, Appendant and in Groſs, _ 10,8 
Chap. VIII Of che Right of Patronage, uf 
whom it ſhall be ſaid to belong, Of  Coparcener, if 


and Tenants in Common. 116 1 


Means it may paſs from one Perſon to another 
and how it may come to the King. 1209 


Chap. X. Advowſons and Right Preſentatim 


© "how granted over from one Perſon to another, 


bat Grants are good, or not. ric 

Chap. XI. Right of Preſentation, by vba 
Means forfeited. I 5b 

Chap. XII. Of Lapſe. _ 7 


Conſequences thereof; and of the Writ of Righ 
[1/0 

Chap. XVIII. Of @ommendams. + 358 
Chap. XIX. Of Curates and Lecturert. 265 


Chap. XX. Of Preſentations and Admiſſion '© 


Clerks preſented ; what Preſentations are good; 
and what are Cauſes ſufficient for the Biſkop to 
'* refuſe to admit; of Jure Patronatus and Ca- C 
__ veats, "Pf | 0 
15 XXI. What Remedy for a Clerk * 2 C 
ed, if the Biſhop refuſe to admit him, 8c. Of 
Duplex Querela, & jure Patronatus. op 
5 ap, 


725 1 
= 


Clergy-Man's Law. 

Chap. XXII. Of the Writs of Quare Impedit | 1 
and Aſſiſe” of Darrein Preſentment, for what 4 
and for whom they are maintainable, and upon | 
S what Sei rde ROT. 425 
I Chap: XXIII. ries of Quare Impedit, and 


WA) 
1 
* 


] | Darrein Preſentment, how to be. brought, 447 
5 Chap. XXIV. Ware Impedit, and Dar- 


rein Preſentment ; by whom, againſt whom, 
and in what Count) to de brought; and 
what ſhall be ſuſficient. Cayſe to abate ; ſuch 


198 Wing, nn pDLAY ber 486 
Chap. XXV. Declarations in Quate Impedit, 


Kc. in what Manner to be framed, and what. 
oupht to be alledged therein. | 


— 


1 | b 1:01 aft 4M 
8 Chap. XXVI. Of Proceſs, and Pleas in Quare | —_ 


— 8 Impedit, and Darrein Preſentment; what = 

Pleas are proper, and ought or may be pleaded 4 
1288 by the Ordinary, Patron and Incumbent reſpe- = 
ik | &ively; and of what' Matters a' Fury in Quare 115 
10 Impedit ought to inquire; — 490 149 
14 Chap. XXVII. Jadgments in Quare Impedit, 4 
i 7 &c. and of Mriti td le awarded to the Biſhop | 4 
15 upon ſuch Judgment. 3518 Il 
„ Cbap. XXVII. The Effetts. of d Fudgment in ä "x4 


Quare Impedic, and Darrein-Preſentment, 


Ugh and of the Writ awarted"to the Biſhop," &c. 

* to admit, & c. grounded thereupon. What is to 1 
be done upon ſuch Writ, and what Return the 4 

365 | Biſhop may make thereunto. 1761 1720 f 

„Cp. XXIX -Of Mn, & Error upon Fulg- 

x ents in Quare Impedit, and Aſixe of Dar- 

P rein Preſentment. | | 159 


* Chap. XXXVII. Of Reſidence, and Non. reſi- 
3.70 | dence. "4 1.222 | h x 673 
100 Chap. XXXVIII. Of Corporation, Sole and 

Akgregate, and the Statutes. concerning Mort. 
fo main, x 699 


L > | Replewin 


516 


Replevin & Avowry. 


* * 
— , — * — — 


KReplevin & Avomry. 


The Nature of Replevin, Avowry, an 4 
Aude ir explained in the Second Part of Wl 
Inſtructor Clericalis, Tit eod', Wk 


5 

* E Bars and Avowries- relating to this 1 
Head, divide themſelves into many Bran. Mee 
ches, as followeth; and they are alſo many in 
them long and intricate, and therefore can. tie 
not be fer down at large in this Treatiſe, bur 
we will a little infiſt upon each Particular. Pit 


| FIZ. 

© 1, Pleas in Abatement, 
2. Non cepit Averia. 

©. 3. Cepit in alio Loco. 

A. Def cogn' ut Ballivus. 

5. Def advocat in jure ſuo propr. 

6 6. Def advocat in jure Uxoris. 
7. Proptietas Averiorum placitat' per Def.. 
8. Licenc! ad imponend' Averia placitat. ÞÞ ; 
9. Bar pur Damage feſant, vide ante. f 


* 


Rs 10. Avowry ſur Title. 

11. Avowry pur Rent: charge. * 

* 12. Simile pur Rent ſur Demiſe. 0 
13 Simile pur Services, & Bar inde. 
14. Avowry pur Amer cement. A 
„15. Simile pur Fine. 14 
16. Simile pur Payn. : 
bo 


17. Avowry ſur Preſcription on Cufonfſ*Þ 

.\.” *©.de Common, Et Bar inde. Cat 
18. Simile de Inclofures, & Bar inde. Þ};* 
19. Gage Deliverance. | 
20, Judicia in Replevin. Jy 


# : LOSER * 


Replevin & Avowry. 517 
Firſt, Let it be obſerved, that by a Stat. PlaintiffTn 
made. 4 & 5 Anme, cap. 16. For Amendment CT ON 
of the Law, tis enacted, That it ſhall and „ 
may be lawſul for any Defendant or Tenant Matters as he 
Lin any Action or Suit, or for any Plaintiff in ſhall think 
L Replevin, in any Court of Record, with the 2<cellary. - 
Leave of the ſame. Court, to plead as many 
Beveral Matters thereto as he ſhall think neceſ- 

| fary for his Defence. 
h Provided nevertheleſs, That if any ſuch Mat- But Coſts 
an- Miter hall, upon a Demurrer join'd, be judged gainſt _ 
' of Fete Coſts ſhall be given at the Diſcre- gig fund 
an-Meion of the Court: Or if a Verdict ſhall be found 
bu upon any Iſſue in the ſaid Cauſe for the Plain- 
Biff or Demandant, Coſts ſhall be alſo. given 
Bn like Manner, unleſs the Judge who tried _ ,- 
he ſaid Iſſue ſhall certifie, That the ſaid De- +2423 
Jendant or Tenant, or Plaintiff in Replevin, 
ad a probable Cauſe to plead ſuch Matter, 
hich, upon the faid Iſſue, ſhall be found 
beainſt him. 


unleſs, &s. 


def.. Abatement, for that the Plaintiff onght 
at. to have Action of Detinue, and not 
Replevin. 


15 * predict XII per R. D. Attorn' Abatement, 
E ſuum ven & deſend' vim & injur' for that 
quando, &c. Et idem J. H. pet judic* de beate. 
brevi predict quia dic' qd* predict J. W. Cattle. 
dito tee quo ſupponit capcon predict' fieri 
apud N. predict deliberavit eidem J. H. ca- 
talla predict ad ea ad uſum ipſius J. W. 
ſalvo cuſtodiend', Virtute cujus liberation 
idem J. H. catalla ill' adtunc & ibm' cepit, 
que quidem capco' eſt eadem capco de qua 
Firſtſl idem J. W. fe modo querit. In quo caſu 
LI3z idem 


tom 


2 2 = MO Eo PL. 0 
58 Replevin & Avowry. 
idem J. W. beret' vers“ ipſum J. H. Action 
<P © Detention' Catall' & non Action” per didn 
2 © breve de Repleg', Et hoc patat' eſt verificare 
. unde per” judic de brevi predict, &c. 
Rep! gd: Et predict J. W. dic' qd' breve fan 
Def* cepit. predict per aliqua per predict J. H. prealk 
© pat” eaſſati non debet, quia idem J. W. die 
© q& predict J. H. tee caption* ptedictꝰ faq 
© catalla predict' de injur* ſua propt' cepit ii 
3 * forma qua idem J. W. fuperius vers eum que 
Traverſe De» 0 ritur, Abſq; hoc qd' idem J. W. deliberar 
livery. © eidem J. H. Catalla predict' in forma qu 
© jdem J. ſuperius allegavit. Et hoc parat elf 
* verificare, Unde pet' judic? fi breve "ſun 
© predic ro'ne preallegat* caſſari debeat. 
Tue ſur De. Et predict' J. H. dic' qq* predict J. 
ery. © deliberavit eidem J. H. catalla pred' in fo 
© qua idem J. H. ſuperius placitando allegari 
| © Et de hoc'pon? ſe ſuper Priam', Et qd? J. 
c ſilit', &c. | Vide Raſt. Ent. 569 


. 


Aliter paſt Oyer es qd Capellanus Cantan 
non eſt no en dignitatis, Et Judic n 


Def, Ge. 


Narr. 3 Ominus J. Capellanus Cantar', & 
D ſuum fuit ad reſpond” J. B. de pli 

„ cito quare cepit Averia ipſius J. B. &. 

© injuſte detinuit contra vad” & pleg”, &c. 

© unde idem J. B. &c. Et predic? J. C. 

* propr” perſon ſua ven & defend vim 

Defendant injut' quando, &c. Et pet' auditum Que 
praysOyer of © de caption” & detention Averiorum predid 
che Plaint. © coram Vic! Com' predict' ſact' & hic in Cl 
© ad hunc diem ſcilt' in Cro', &c. Virtul 

© brevis Domini Regis de Recordare retort 

Et ei legitur in hec verba, J. B queritur 

5 Domino J. Capellano Cantarie, &c. « 

c placi 


Replevin & Ayowry: 81898 
 placito caption & injuſte detention Averio- 8 

© rum, pleg de pros de Averiis predict retornꝰ 

ſi retorn inde adjudicetur J. T. & J. H. Et 

ſoper hoc idem J. B. per judic* de querel' Abatement. 
predict eo qq Capellanus Cantar non eſt 

no'en Dignitatis, Et idem J. C. in querela 

il non noiat* per aliquod cognomen unde 

pet judic', Et qd' querel' ill caller” & retorn? 

| Averiorum predi” fibi adjudicet', &c. Et 

W quia videtur Juſtic' hic qq' querel' predi& Judic' pro 
don eſt ſufficiens in Lege ad preſat J. C. Def“ 

coram juſtic' hic ad eand' querel' poni | ; 
| reſpond eo q@ Capellanus Cantar' non eſt = 
WF no'en Dignitatis. Ac idem J. C. in querel' | 

W il!” per aliquod cognomen non noiat' Cons 

eſt qq* predi&* J. B. nihil capiat per quereP 

ſuam ſed fit in mia” pro falſo clamore ſuo, &c. Retorn' Ave- 
Et predict J. C. eat inde fine die, Et ha- riotumagard. 
x beat retorn' Averiorum predict', &c. Vide 
Rs. Ent. 570. Simile Upper-Bench Prece- 

dents 96. | 

* Vide Abatement de Narr' puis ſecond Delive- Ap County. 
rance, Eo qd' Locus captionis eſt in al* Corn”, 

1 Townſ. Fud. 274. Theſ.” Brev, 65. by Way 

of Recital, 

J. * Narr? ſuper ſecunda deliberatione de Locus captio- 
Averiis capt” in 2 Locis apud B. placitum in nis. 
© Eſtopple, Eo qd' Quer“ prius narravit vers 

Def de captione in une Loco in C. 3 Browal. 


E ̃ͤ—œ a ̃— u . ̃ ˙ Re Enos 


; | 11 F 
a . Vide 3 Lev. Rep. 121, &. Bar in Reple. A former Re- 
5 by a former Recovery in Treſpaſs plead- Ta 8 


d, ro which the Defendant demurr d, Idem p jeaded. 

23. And Note, That the Replevin was 

rought for two Geldings, to which the Deſen- 

ant pleaded, That the Plaintiff had before 4 

rought an Action of Treſpaſs, Quare clanſum 1 
I 14 fru i 


"x = r 
n 
5 — 
— —_—_—J_ 


$29 


* 


_— —— 


Piegit & duos 


Averment, 


Such Reco - 2. It was argued, That the Recovery ill 
very no Bar Treſpaſs ſhould be no Bar in this Action 
in Replevin. which is for the Cattle themſelves, the othelf 
only for the Damages of taking, & c. and ng 
for the Value of the Cattle; and ſo it ſeem d u 
be, for it could not be ſuppoſed that 40 s. wi 


Tudjc'-pro.. the Value of che two Horſes, whereupon Judy 


Quer'. ment was given for the Plaintiff, Id. 124, 125, 
| but it is there made a Quere, becauſe no 
Q Averment for what the Damages in the fil 
Action was given, neither did it appear fd 
what they were given, but only by Suppoli| 
and refers to Lacon and Bernard's Cale in the i 

of Cro. Rep. in Treſpaſs. 
See 3 Levinx 194, Oc. Bar in Treſpaſs h 

a former Action of peg? £ 

See 2 Lut. 1175, 1176, Cc. Eſtopple toi 
yo os Bar after ſeveral Imparlances in 17 — Tht 
ed after ſeve · Defendants confeſſed the whole Declaration 
ral Contiuu- which was for taking a Waggon 21 Fulii, 1 W 
ances. & MH. and then plead a Releaſe of the Plaintiff 
to the Defendants, dated 6 Feb. 1 F. & N 
and the Plaintiff replies, by Way of Eſtopple 
That the Defendants ought not to be admirte 
to ſuch a Plea, becauſe the Plaintiff, 4 
chaelmas Term paſt, had declared modo & for 
predict, and that the Defendants had imparl 
to Octab Hil”, and afterwards another 1 
1 * 


ZS r e e e. s 8 


p 
1 


1 


| Repleym & Avyowry; 521 

re unce in Cro. Trin. prout per Record in Cur, Ce. 

na and demand Judgment, if the Defendants oughe 

na co be admitted fo to plead. Defendants de- 

mur. | | 

Toll And upon the Argument it was faid, That ggopple dil. 

nll the Defendants were not eſtopped to plead the allowed. 

E Releaſe, notwithſtanding the Imparlances ; for 

Iche Diverſity thro' all the Books was, That 

beſore Ifſue che Continuances are not mention. 

led, but always after, and then it ought to be 

i pleaded after the laſt Continuance. 

ion Upon the firſt Argument, Juſtice Powell and 5,9, mew pre - 

ERkevyWereot Opinion that the Plea was good, Def” niſi. 

and gave Judgment for the Defendant, 1%, c. 

and then it was argued again in Aichaelmas 

Term, and the Cale of Alderſon and Dow, 

3 Keb. 397. was cited for the Plaintiff, where, 

Win an Action on the Cale againſt two Admi- 

niſtrators, for Money due to the Inteſtate, the 

Defendant after Imparlance pleaded Action - 

n, Cc. for that one of the Plaintiffs had re- 

leaſed to him; upon which the Plaintiff de- 

Wmurr'd, and Judgment for the Plaintiff, for per obj. It ought 
Cur”, the Plea ought to have been pleaded to bave been 

fs HMaſter the laſt Continuance, and by not fo — 

Pleading, the whole Benefit of the Releaſe was Continuanc 

toi loſt: And many Precedents were cited in the b 
TH Principal Caſe after the laſt Continuance, but 

ation they were all after Iſſue join d. The Reporter 

1 further obſerves, That it was ordered to be ar- 

intilfYeued again, but he ſuppoſes it was not; for, 

& Mopon Search, nothing was to be found in the 

oppleſ Prot bonotarys Book, nor any Judgment entred 

mitteggon the Rolls, Id. 1177. And Fol. 1178. he fur- 

„ Aſther obſerves, That by the beſt Authorities of 

* formgthe Year Books, Cc. if any Thing happen How ſuch a 

1parlYpending the Writ, and before. Iſſue join'd, Matter hap- 


[mpaYwhich may be pleaded in Bar of the Action; p*ning oughe 
"land y be p and be pleaded 


522 


ANReplevin & Ayowry. 
which proves that the Writ is abated, and not 
only abateable for it, it may be pleaded,” Not. 
withſtanding a Continuance after the 'Thin 
happen d; and need not be pleaded, That a. 
ter the laſt Continuance, G. But then iff 
ſeems, by the Opinion of Jenour Prothonatoryſ 
ef the Common Pleas, that in ſuch Caſes the 
Pleading ought to be, That ſuch a Thing hap-. 
pened pending the Writ, as in 26 Hen. 8. 3. 
Plac. 13. But if they are at Iſſue, it ought tu 
be pleaded, That after the laſt Continuance;ſſi 
And Brook, in his Abridgment of 26 H. 8. Ti 
Brief 2. approves the Diverſity there taken by 
Jenner, with a Nota le Diverſity. 

But in the principal Caſe here, the Repor 
ter obſerves, That it is not ſaid that the ReleakW 
was made either before the Writ purchaſed, 
or pending the Writ, or after the laſt Continy 
ance. f 


4 
of 


2. Non cepit Averia, &c. in Replevin. 
6. a E“ predict J. G. & T. per T. G. Atl 


torn” ſuum ven' & defend” vim &8 
© injur quando, &c. Et idem T. G. dic' qd 
© ipfe non cepit Averia predict prout predict 
© J. K ſuperius vers“ eum queritur, Et de hoc 
pon ſe ſuper Priam', Et predict” J. K. ſilit i; 
© The other Defendant makes Cognizance as Bailif, 
* &. Vide 2 Las. 1131. Simile, Roaſt. Ent 
© 56x, 565. 

+ Vide x Brown 312. & 1 Mod, Itrand. 325 : 
SJ. * Quoad partem Averiorum non ' cepit 

© Raft. Ent. 557, 565, 575. 
Non cepit catalla & advocat captionenf | 
f 


Averiorum. Raft. En, 5 65. 


f. * Quoad part' non cepit, quoad reſid 
4 Cepit in alia loco. 2 Brownl. 88. 
. © Simile 


| Repkvin & Avowry. 523 
nl © Simile, 1 24d. Intr. 343. Et travers 
WF d' cepit in loco in Narr. Repl qd' locus 
of + yocat' tam per no'en de E. quam per no en 

de H. Rejo' qd vocat' per no'en de H. tan- 
ig tum, Et travers qd* vocat' tam per un quam 
TY al' & Iſſue. Vide Raft. Ent. 556. 1 Brom. 
the Wh 308, 1 Mod, Intr. 343. 
P- /. © Def' dic! qq' ſunt diverſi loci cogn' 

per idem no'en, Et travers“ qd? eſt cal? locus 


CO in villa predict' cogn' per no en de M. tan- 
ei wm. 1 Mod. Intr. 341. 


Til 

% 3. Quoad Locum G · Diem. 

5 WT N a Replevin for taking his Cattle, in a Place If the Deſen- 

fed, I called O. Defendant ſays, That he was ſeized danr ovghr to 

ni Three Acres of Land inthe Place where, Ce. — — * g 
pnd ſo avows for Damage Feſant, and demands Acres, Gr. 


Loſts and Damages according to the Form of 
de Statute; Plaintiff demms, Er pro cagſis, Eo 
. I predic” W. H. in advocat ſua predif non 
Aendir quant it atem nec qualitatem prediff Loci in 
n , ©c. and upon the Argument it was inſiſt- 
* qd ad, d (2 That the Defendant ought to have al- 
edged, that the Locus in quo contained ſuch a 
umber of Acres, &c. Sed non allocatur. 
>. That he ought to have alledged of what 
ſtate he was ſeized of thoſe Three Acres, and 
he whole Court was of that Opinion : And 
uſtice Powell ſaid, That it had been ill upon a 
general Demurrer; but Leave was given to 
nend the Avowry upon Payment of Coſts by 
dnſent. Vide 2 Lat. 1231, G. | 


onen . © Def' cogn* caption' pro dampn Traverſe de 
ſac, Et traverſat Locum capnonis, Et lieu. 

relidÞ ideo pet” judic* de Narr. Et pro tetorn 

EY habend advocat pro dampnis fact in ibo 

* © Tento', 


74, 475. Ver. Imr. 48, 244. Raf. 5% 
1 2 Brownl. 88. ä = 
Simile. . © Def” traverſat' Locum captionis & ad 


dic de Nur". 4 predict“ E. W. L. & R. per E. C. Att' ſun 


| Replevin'& Avowry; 


© Tento', Etexit' de Loco captionis. f 


2 © yocat dampnis facien', Raſt. En. 556. 
Def* per jw. . Simile, Clift, Ent. 636. viz. — Bl 


© ven” & defend” vim & injur quando, &c. IM 
© per” judic* de Narratione predi* quia di 
© qd ipſi ceper” Averia predict in quodaf 
* magno vaſto & loco cognit' in Com' predidſ 
jacen extra aliquam Parochiam Villam fig 
* Hamlett', vocat' 7ilney Smeeth, Abſq; hal 
© q& ipſi ceper* Averia predict apud Terri 
ton ict Johannis predict in predict Loi 
„ yocat* Sr. Jobn's Grove, prout predict J. CG 
© ſuperius vers eos queritur, Et hoc para 

- © ſunt verificare, Unde pet' judic' de Nan 
Et pro retour: predict', &c. Et pro retorn' Averiorunih 
advocaat. predict advocant' pro Communia ad meſſy 
gium &c. Pertinen'. 


Traverſe. 


Traverſe See 2 Lut. 1147, and 11 70. where tl 

wanting. Awowry was held ill upon a General Demurre 

| becauſe the Place of taking, mentioned in i 
Count, was not traverſed. 


L © Simile, & pet judic' de Narr' & cogl | 
© in alio loco pro arrerap' reddit”. Idem Clif 

© 644 | 3 

( J. d' cepit Averia in alio loco in eadenfſ 
© Villa & cogn' caprion' pro Serviciis. Raf 

© 554, 555, &c. Hern. 667. Repl' qd cepl 

in loco in Narr', Id. 679. 1 

J. Simile & cogn' pro ſervicis & reddit. 

& Thomp. 274. vide Rob. Ent. 405. 1 

. © Q& captio ſuit in alio Com' fur recitÞ, 


del Plea in Abatement, Theſ. Br. 69. ; 


i Replevin & Avo-w'y. z 


n : Quoad diem. 
a. TArr' de Averiis capt 22 die, Def 
a advocat” caption? 23 die in Libo 


tento', Et traverſe caption' Averiorum 22 
die. Hern. 682, 1 Mod. Intr, 318, 


Nquarto ſupradicto ſactam, Quia dic', &c. 
Aud. Intr. 3 18. 


N Avomry per 3 
WW Hors de you . Contra Balm, Oc. 
T predict A. proteſtando qd” predictꝰ Bar de injuria 


run 
ef E meſſuagium eſt extra ſeod & Domi- ſua propr”- 
um predict C. & fuit die caption? predict, 
Die qd' ipſe ab Actione ſua predict' vers 
refae” S. Balliu'm, hundr' per aliqua prealle- 
at precludi non debet, quia dic* ꝗd' idem 
die & Anno predict Averia predict' in 
to loco in quo, &c. de injur' ſua propr* 
Wepit & ea injuſte detinuit contra Vad' 8: 
coßieg' Abſq; hoc qd” idem S. tee' caption” pre- 
1 Clif x ſuit Ballivus predict B. prout, &c. Vids 
. 560. ; 
enden. Bar per non cepit Avaria & Iſſue, Et g per Hors 
 RoYrocar' pro reddit? aretro ut ſuper verum de ſon Fee. 
cefienentem 8: infra feod', &c. Et Bar al 
a owry per Hors. de fon Fee. Et. 
reddudict J B. dic ꝗd' nec predict J. C. cap- 
nem Averiorum in predict loco in quo, 
c. juſtam advocate, nes predict J. D. ut 
Quo I © Ballivus 


> tif 
urrer 
in thi 


 TEctti 


— *» 


526 


Simile - 


Def* cogn' 
ac Ballivi E. 


Et predi”* J. C. dic? qd? ipſe ad juſt adn 


V. cum pertin' in Com? predict unde iff; 


| © nico ſuo ut de feodo, Et quia Avetia pretiff, 


Replevin & Avowry. 
© Ballivus ejuſdem J. C. juſtam cogn' debeny; 4 
© quia dic' qd' idem locus eſt extra feodum & 
© Dominu'm ipſius J. C. Et hoc parat eſt ven 
© ficare unde ex quo predi& J. C. & J. 
© caption” Averiorum predi& in predicto lou 
© in quo, &c. ſuperius cogn' pet judic* vi 
© dampn'” ſua ea occo'ne ſibi adjudicari, & 


© cand', Et predict J. D. dic? qd' ipſe ut BU 
© livs ejuſdem J. C. ad juſt cogn' captinffi 
© Averiorum predict' in predicto loco in qui 
© &c. per aliqua pieallegat precludi non debem j 
© quia dic qq' idem Locus eſt infra feod & D 
© minu'm ipſius J. C. prout ipſi ſuperius alleg 
* ver”, Et de hoc pon fe ſuper Priam”, hy 
© predi@” J. B. ſilit. Vide Raft. Ent. 565. 
© Kem 566. Avowry pur Services fur 
* very Tenant, Bar per Hors de ſon Fee, 
© Iſſue fur ceo. Vide x Mod. Intr. 303, & 


4. Def cogn ut Ballions pur Damage feſul * 


” ET predict N. F. W. A. & N. A. if 
a B. D. Attorn' ſuum ven & defen % 
© vim & injur quando, &c. Et ut Ballivi EH 


* Ar bene cogn' caption' Averiorum pred „ 
© in predict loco in quo, &c. cum pertiliſ.” 
Et juſte, &c. Quia dic qq* diu' ante pl py 
© dia tempus quo ſupponit caption” Ave. 


» . . U 
© rum ill' fieri necnon eod' tee caption 


© fact' idem E. D. ſuit ſeit de Manerio 75 


dict' locus in quo, &c. eſt & predict 5 
© quo, &c. nec non a tee* cujus contr” m 
© hominum' non exiſtit fuit parcell* in Do . 
f predifto tee quo, &c. fuer” in pred 
loco cum pertinꝰ in quo, &c. herbam inF*" 
1 [1 | 0 


Replevin & Avowry. 500 
wc creſſen depaſcen' & dampnum ibm 
J facien dem N. W. & N. ut ballivi predict 
E. bene cogn' captionꝰ Averiorum ill in eo- 
Lem loco cum pertin in quo, &c. pro damp- 
nis predict fic ibm” fact' & juſte, &c. | 
KF Bar proteſto qd' E. D. non ſuit ſeit de Bar per Com. 
| Manerio de V. nec qd' predict' locus eſt par- mon Appue- 


Bal Common of Paſture, appertaining to the Plaimiff*s 
* Houſe, &c. Aſs. Ent. 457. Simile, r Saund, 
aol -347- Vide poſtea ſur Preſcription, &c. 

C * Vide CM. 655. 1 Bro, 304. Rob. Ent. 
W141; &C. 

» AY 
„t Ballivi G. B. in Medicinis Doctor, 
L. T. Spinſter, pur Damage feſant. 


L predict R. R. R. M. R. E. & E. D. i 
LL per E. H. Att? ſuum ven & defend wg 
im & injur* quando, &c. Et ut Ballivi G. B. &c. 
Wn Medicinis Do&or? & L. T. Spinſter, bene 

ogn caption Averiorum predict' in predict 
; 1 ocis in quibus, &c. Et juſte, &c. Quia 
15 Wic qd predict Loci in quibus caption' Ave. 
1 — Wocum predict ſuperius fieri ſupponit, vocat 
PI" Wmlands. Kerce Downe and Lady More, conti. 
P*"Ynt in ſe necnon eodem tee? quo caption? 
ate Nreriorum predic” ſuperius fieri ſupponitur 
Meſpntinebant in fe 500 Acr' terte & 500 
non er more cum pertin in predi&' ſeperal 
__ roch“ de S. B. als S. & B. in Com' pre- 
n 25 H. Que quidem 500 Acr* terre & 500 
1 fr more ſunt necnon a tee cujus conti“ 
tr Dd m hominum non exiſtit fuer” parcel' 
n 4 anerit de B. infra Com” predict, De quo 
pr ] dem Maner' cum pertin predi&* G. B. 
P"FL.T, diu ante tempus quo ſupponitur 
m inf, . caption' 


A. 


cell predict Manerii, pro Placito, the Place 3s tent. 7 


Pn 


Replevin & Avowry. 
© caption' Averiorum predict' ſuperius fierii 
* predictis Locis in quibus, &c. necnon e 
© dem tee quo, &c. fuer” ſeit” in Dominico il 
© ut de feodo, Et quia Averia predict pil 
i © dicto-tee* quo, &c. fuer' in predict lol 
| iin quibus, &c. Herbam ipſorum G. & 
| nuper ibm creſſen depaſcen' & dampn 
ibm facien' iidem R. R. R. & E. ut Bali 
predict G. & L. predict tee quo, &c. bg 
(cogn' caption Averiorum predict' in mil 
* Gictis locis in quibus, &c. Et juſte, þ 
dampnis ibm' ſic facien'; Et hoc parat ful 
torm. © verificare, Unde pet” judic* & retorn' Ave 

rum predi&t” unacum dampnis mis & expꝗ 

© ſuis per ĩpſos circa ſectam ſuam in hac pal 
: c appoit* juxta formam ſtatuti ſibi  adjudicf 
1 © gcc. Vide 2 Saund. 320, &c. | 
8 Def cogn' ut Ballivus pro dam 
facto, Bar qd* Def' non fuit Ballivus. 
©. 604. Placitat. Gen. p91; _ F 


I 
1 
| 
i 


8 
1 
7 


5. Def Advocat in jure ſuo propr. 


Nt? D' locus in quo, &c. eſt libe 
y tentum' Def” qui advocat pro da 
© no ſco Bar qd' Locus eſt liberum Tent 

Quer & non liberum Tentum' Def”. 
Def' Advocat Et predict W. per J. G. Att ſuum 
mos (&.) Et bene Advocat captionem Av 
al rum predict in predicto loco in quo 
Et juſte, &c. Quia dic? qd” predict' L 
in quo ſupponicur caption* Averiorum 
© di&® fieri eſt & tee? caption' predict ſup 
© fiert ſuppoit' fuit ſolum & liberum ten, 
© 3pſins W. Et pro eoqd” Averia predict 
© tee? caption fieri fippoir' fuer” in prel 
| © loco in quo, &c. Herbam ibm' tunc* cre 
Fi * depalcen' & dampnum facien', N 
1 | © A 


> + 8 . * 72 4 ; 
Replevin:&iAvowty. 529 
Averia ill' ſic ibm' dampnum facien' cepit 
prout-8i, ene licuit & hoe parit' eſt verifi- 
care, Unde pet' judic' & retorn? Averiorum 
predict ſibizadjudicari; &. ; 
Et predict' J. C. dic qq? predict W. cap- Bar al Avow- 
tion Averiarum predict in predicto loca ih ry. 
quo, &c. ro'ne preallegat juſtam advocate 
non debet Quia «dic? qd' predict“ Locus in 
quo, &c. eſt & predict tee captionꝰ pre · 
dia” fact & diu ante fuit ſolum & liberum 
tentum' ipſius J. C. per quod idem J. diu 
ante tempus caption' predict' fact' poſuit 
Averia predict in predicto loco in quo, &. 
ad depaſcend' in eodem prout ei bene licuit, 
Et predict W. Averia ill” dicto tee? caption 
predict fact in dicto loco in quo, &c. in- 
juſte cepit prout idem J. ſuperiùs vers“ eum 
queritur, Abſq; hoc qd' predict Locus in Traverſ. fo» 
gud, &c. dicto tee caption' predict' fact — 
uit ſolum & liberum tentum” predictꝰ W. ng 
prout idem W. ſuperius allegavit, Et hoc pa- 
rat” eft verificare, Unde per' judic & damp- 
na ſua occo'ne caption' predict & injuſte 
detention' Averiorum predict' ſibi adjudi- 
cari, &c. | bf 352 , 3 
Et predict W. dic' qd? predict Locus in 
quo, &c. dicto tee capcon' predict ſuppoit' 
ſuit ſolum & liberum tentum' ipſius W. prout Iq fur 
ipſe ſuperius allegavit, Et de hoc pon' ſe ſu- Trayerſ”, 
er Priam', Et predict J. C. ſilit' Ideo, &c. 
Vide Raſt. Ent. 565, 568, &c. Co. Ent. 600. 
Vet. Intr," 94. 3 Brownl, 267, 390. Vide 


Roſe, En. 560, 5 59. 8 


Mm 6. Def 


$36 


1 


* 5 | 


* 


ill, for be ought to have ſaid, Ante impar 


Replevin & Avowry, 
6. Def advoc in Jure Dæoris. 


6. Efendant avows, in the Right of tif 
Wiſe, for a Rent Charge deviſed 
her, fo that ſhe remained Sole. 2 Saun. 194 
Vide Raſt, Ent. 555, and 565. 
One Defendant avows in the Right of tif 
Wiſe, the others make Cognizance, as his By 
liffs for Rent Arrear. dem 285. Vide poſt 
Avowry pur Rent, &. Vide 2 Lut. 1595. 


6— * 


Defendant avowd, Pro dampn feo' ui 
leit' fuit in feodo; mhereupor Plaintiff 
prays, that Defendant may wage Delin 
rance, ut ſequitur. . 


FI ſuper hoc predict E. dic qd” pu. 
4 dictꝰ M. de vaccis predict' adhuc ſelf 
exiſtit, Undeex quoeadem M. nihilpropri 
* eatis clam” in eiſdem vaccis, pet* qd” eadcl 
M. vad” eidem E. liberation”, &c. Et inve 
* pleg' de liberar' inde facien@, viz. R. T. 
W. L. de, &c Ideo predict E. habeat ini 

* liberationem, &c. Then the Plaintiff pla 
for Common of Paſture, in Bar of the Awvoun 


t Vide Raf. En. 559. 1 Med. Iatr. 316, 374 


| Tender of Anietidt pleaded in Bar. 


MES Avowry was for Damage feſant i 
his Freehold, and che Plaintiff plead$ 
Tender of Amends, * Ante deliberatione 
© Aveitorum ill eidem Quer' ; hich was be 


tionem Averiorum ill', &c. and the Def end 
* demurrd, Pro eo qd oblaco, Anglic q 
| 


Replevin & Avowry. 8 534 


© rhe Tender Emend' predict allegat fore ad le 
Conuſee non eſt ſufſiciens, Item pro eo qd' 
predict quer non allegavit oblacionetn pre · 
ac 25. fieri tempote Diſtrictionis predict 
a capt nec ante Averia predict fuer capt” 
= rem qd idem Quer* non monſtrat valor! 
bDampn' pro quo Oblatio emend* predict 
* head fuit. Vide Co. Ent, 63. 


1 Mie Bar al Avomry per Di ſelaimer, Et 
| LE obtulit Def eien emendas pro 
dampno. 


ro'ne 2 caption Averiorum Title. 
þ neter in predicto loco in quo, &e. Juſtam 
I advocare non debet quia dic ipſe idem J. A. 
Prog” nihil habet nec unquam habuit aut clamat 
ce nec unquam clamavit aliquod titulum vel in- 
Pl tereſſe in predict 12 Acr* terre cum pertin' 
vocat' R. Meadow in aliqua parte eorundem, 
0 E d de omni & de aliquo titlo vel clameojnds 
W pcnicus diſclam', Qd'q; averia predict p 
' Uicto' tee' quo, Ec. in predict 12 Acr' = 
in quo, &c. involuntarie & contra ' menitem 
ipſius J. A. intraver & herbam ibm' creſſern? 
oe paſt* ſuer' & dampnum ibm faciebant, That he im- 
Et idem J. A. in ſco dic? qd” immediate poſt — 
, predict tempus predict trans' ſuperius fieri jr 
ſuppoit' ſcilt' eodem 12 die Not” Anno Regni ö 
nt dicti Domini Regis nunc nono ſupradict apud 
lead: Paroch' ſci' P. iuxta Civic Wigorn' predict 
long ipſe obtulit ad folvend' prefat' J. B. 5 s. leglis 
monete Anglie pro Recompenſatione & Sa. 
par tisfactione trans predict fic involuntar & 
contra, mentem ipſius J. per Averia pre; 
pl dia” fat”, Qui quidem 5 8. fuer” ſufficien? 
nh, M m 2 © recom: 


F. E; predict J. A. dic q predict J. 5. Dich o* 


= 6 4 
* P 1 ES” „ —— 


„ _ of a bb was 4a tho. o * A "SAS. w Lg 
= 6 N V5 tooth Ts 2 ha IST: & 9 4 +6 iS C 
La wy * 
1 


332 Replevin & Avowry. 
recompenſatio & emend', Anglice Amend, 
pro trans' it, Et idem J. A, ulterius in fc 
© dic*:qd predict J. B. eoſdem 5 8. de eoden 
J. A recipere adtunc & ibm' recuſavit & de 
6 negavit, Et hoc parat' eſt verificare, Und 
© ex quo idem J. B. caption” Averiorum prof 
dict in predicto loco in quo, &c. ſuperiuſ 
© cogn' per” judic & dampna ſua occo ne cap 
© tion” & injuſte detention* Averiorum ul i 

Demurter. «©. aqjudicari,.&c. Demurrer inde & joindeff 
* in'Demurrer. Vide 2 Lut. 1595, 1956. 


| 
Judgment Upon the firſt Argument, for the Defendat | 
for the A- Cyr” adviſare. vult, but at another Time tl 
vowant. Court gave Judgment «nz voce for the Avonlf 
ant; for they were of Opinion, that the Stu 
21 Fac. 1. did not exend to this Caſe, buf 
only to Actions of Treſpaſs: But as to Rt 
plevins, it remains as it was at the Comma 
Law, and thereby tis clear, that the Tendi 
— Amends ought to be before the Impoundiny 
Id. 1956. 
Nite, It's there ſaid, That by the Stat; 2 
Tac. 1. cap. 16, Tender of Amends in a 
Action of Treſpaſs is ſufficient at any Tin 
before: the Action brought. 
 Alfothe-Reporter obſerves, That the Ave 
was not pleaded as it ought, as to a Seiſin j 
Uxoris. Vide Placitat. Gen, 597. Co. Ent. 601 
1 Brownl, 160. 


SER 


| 
( 
| 
j 
d 


Yi 
1 


4 
« 
F'S 
"% 


- N e 8 
C ug. 
* —_— — — — — — 2. - — 
. 9 
* — — 2 
- 


1 
l 
1 


l. 

| Bar al Avowry per Diſclaimer, Et Inqui f 
| de Dampn agard. tot 

lo 


Diſclaimer « C. Ex predict J. non cogn' aliqua "t pr 
Tenmcy. 1 predict” T. preallegat' dic qd ide 
I. caption' Averiorum predict' in * Bay 

| | © lochpre 


Replevin & Ayowry; $33 


B+ loco in quo,  &c. tone preallegar” juſtam 
W 2advocar*. non debet, Quia dic qd” ipſe non 


4M tenet de predi?, T. tenta? predict ſed ea de 
aa eod' D. omnio tenere deadvocat & diſclamat, 
de Unde pet judic & dampna ſua occo ne cap- 
iu tion' Averiorum predict' ſibi adjudicari, &c. 
1 Et quia neſcitur que dampna predict J. ſuſti- 
nuit occaſione cape & detenc Averiorum 
a6 predict? Ideo precept' eſt vic! qd' per facrum” 


II. proborum & - leglum' homin' de | 1 g 
Com predict diligent? inquit' que dampn' gap. 
idem J. ſuſtinuit occo' ne caption & deten- : 
tion Averiorum predict', Et Inquiſicon' 

W quam, &c. Scire fac' hic a die, &c. ſub 
il bei, &c. & ſigillis, &c. Vide Raft. Ent. 
bei 561. & x Mod. Intr. 306, 
. Raft. 561. Diſclaimer, per Leſſor vocat in 
ma per Leſſee; and à Plea (of Diſſeiſin) by the 
end 0want to avoid Damages upon the Diſclaim- 
dig and Iſſue upon the Tenancy. | 


at, 2 7. Defendant pleads Property in 


N 400 5 
would © EF* proteſtando qd'' proprietas_ non 


„ji tuit quer', pro placito qd” ceper” ave- 


, Goll na in alio loco; and then avows for Damage 
eſant. Raſt. Ent. 556. Hy 
. © Property pur part', & non cepit pro 
* "oh Placit, "I 602, £ | A 
qu. * Ee predict J. H. & E. per J. L. At. pro- 
torn” ſoum ven' & defend tin 8 injur' quan- 8 n 
do, &c. Et dic“ ꝗd' proprietas Averiorum. altero. 
ua pi predict', predicto tee quo ſupponitur cap- 
* idedfion' Avetiorum ill' fieri, fuit cuidam N. E. 
rediafhar”, Abſq; hoc qd' proprietas Ave iorum 
© loqpredict' fuit prefar? J. P. prout per breve pre- 
6 | M m 3 -* one 


115 
34 


Avowry pur dia” ſyperins ſopponitur, Et hoc parat Cant 


Retorn', 


Pro dampn' 
facien'. 


Iſſue ſur pro- 
W 


r 
Neplevin & Avowry! | 
© verificare,” Unde pet judic de Brevi predi?; . 
Et pro retorn* Averiorum predict hendꝰ pre, 

* dit Jo. H. in jure ſuo propr' bene advocꝗi 
& predict E. ut Ballivus ipſius J. H. bene 
©*-cogn' captionem Averiorum predict? in pre 
* dicto Loco in quo, &c. 'videlt” in una peci 
© terre parcella predict Loci vocat W. inf 
© juxta mare predict” jacen in eo@ loco voc 
W. juxta terras predict” N. E. Bar ex pai 
f bus Oriental' & OccidentaP & quandam 1 
am voc? M. W. ex parte boreali, Et juſt 
© &c Quia dic' qd Locus in quo, &c. Sil 
* prediQ? pecia terre continet in fe & predidh 
© tee? captionis Averiorum predict ſuperiy 
f fieri ſuppoit' continebat in fe unam rodam 
© dimid* unius rode terre cum pertin' in N 
*1Juxta Mare predict', Que quidem una rodal 
* dimid” unius rode, Terre cum pertin' ſunt I f 
1 predict tee quo, &c. ſuer' ſolum & libum' ter 10 
© tum'ipſivs ]. H. Et quia Averia predicta pi 
dicto tee quo, &c. fuer* in predicto loco! 5 
© quo, &c. in eiſdem una roda & dim} * 
5 unius rode terre herbam ibm' tunc creſce 

© depaſcen' dampn' ibm” facien', idem J. H. ii 
« jure ſuo propr' bene advocat', & predif} 
E. ut Ballivus ipſius J. H. bene cogn' captidt 
Averiorum predict' in predict' loco in qui ; 
* &c. in predi&? una roda & dimid' unf. 
rode terre & juſte, &c. dampn' ibm' ſic! 
© cien', Et hoc parat ſunt verificare, Un 
* per judic' & retorn' Averiorum predi * 
* unacum dampnis mis & cuſtag ſuis in H pre 
© parte appoit' juxta formam Statuti in hum 5 | 
© caſu edit” & provis ſibi adjudicari, &C. Re 

Et predict J. P. dic? d' breve ſuum p no 
dict ro 'ne preallegat caſſari non debet, qi e 
© dic? qq” proprietas Averiorum p_— 2 

r | Fs: ei 


do 


| Replevin & Avowry. . 535 
eidem J. P. prout per breve & narr' predic” © 


nt n ſu 3 fi . ＋ 7 
x perius ſupponitur, Et hoc =o qdꝰ inqui- 
i | ratur per Priam, &c. Vide Chift's Ent. 654, 
c. i 
nel 


Ne 
an} 


1¹ 


ter 44 le Property eſt al auter, Et Iſſue 


Hr co. 


F. Er Penn A. per G. H. Att' ſuum par. 
i .en & defend, &c. Et die qd tee 
e captionis predict” fieri ſuppoit proprietas 


Catallorum predict' fuit cuidam R. W. ad- 

huc ſuperſtit & nan prefat* O. Et hoc parat 

eſt verificare, Unde pet' judicium de brevi 

mg, &. Et predict O. dic ꝗd' breve Rep!. 
uum predict ro ne preallegat caſſari non 

debet, Qula dic qꝗd' predict tee“ captionis 
redictꝰ faQ”, proprietas Catallorum predict 

15 eidem O. prout per breve ſuum predict 

ſuppon*, Et hoc pet qꝗd' inquiratur per Iſſue. 
Priam', Et predict' A. ſilit, Ideo, &c. Vide 

Raſt. Ent. 5 57. 


liter ubi ſunt duo Quer, &. Replevin pro 
3 duobus Equis. 


ug I predict' Def? per A. J. Att ſuum gar & Tia 

5 : E ven & r vim & injur' quan- — 

lic do, &c. Et quoad caption' unius equi de 

predict duobus equis, idem Def dic qq' pro- 

prietas equi ill predicto tee quo, &c. fuit 

prefat* R. C. ſoli, Abſq; hoc qd” proprietas 

equi ill predicto tee“ quo, &c. fuit preſat' 

R. & R. prout per breve il ſupponitur, Et 

hoc parat? eſt verificare unde quoad caption 

3. Yequi ill idem Def” per” judic' de equoillo, &c. 
. 7 GS +; 3 


5 5 
3 = — 
> 8 * 


— n 
- — on nu 2 & an 


— oy 


2 = - 
OE Da 25 _—, * #9" 
: _ „ E 


OI — 


U 4 ARG ARSE IE ES 
; FR £4 


» 
* 
— — 
n - D 
» * 2 YL o yy 
bk oor any 


ld Sos a 
ERS 


* 


* 


836 Replevin & ⁰‚w- e 
Si nile ab 5 c Et uoad captionem predict alteribs equi il 
ſid'. 4 pre dict' equis reſid' dem Def dio qdꝰ pto· 

* prietss ejuſdem equi predict tee? quo, & 

'© fuit prefat” R. J. ſoli, abſq' hoc qq' propriga 

equi iſl' fuit prefat' R. & R. prout per brei 

predict ſuperius ſupponitur, Et hoc parz'l 

6. eft veriticare, Unde quoad caption” .equfdenjif 

equi idem Def pet judic'ꝰ de brevi illo, & 

Et pro retorn' Averiorum predi&' hend 

* I dhe. advocat aptionem Averiorum predid 

in predicto toco in quo, (&c) | 1} 

R. pr & Iſue. ye Er pfedict Quer dic' qd? breve ſuum pre 1 

ict ro ge preallegat? calfari non debet il | 

dic? qd proprietas Averiorum predict pe 

dicto tee caption Averiorum predict fuit ei 

dem Quer' prout per breve ill ſupet ius ſupp 

nitur, Et hoc pet qd inquiratur per Prian| F 

E predict Det ' filit?, deo, &c. Vide x Mi 
* Intr, zoo, &c. 


AR 


—— a 


30; Now cepit quoad partem, quoad refid 
74 proprietas Equi fuit al A. P. Et p 
prietas Patelle fuit al T. P. 2 non Queen 
Raſt. Ent. 557. 


Bit non cepit [.* FE; predict J. T. & J. per T. C. At 
. ſuum ven', &c. Et quoad omnia pit 
t dict' Averia preterquam unam equum de eq 
ptedict' & omaia predict” catalla prete 

quam unam patellam de patell predict” api 

predict villam de P. capt', dic' qd' ipft no 

: ceper* ead' Averia & catalla except” pree! 

cept' in ſorma qua predi& R. ſupetius verſh; 

eos queritur, Et de hoc pon' fe ſuper Prian 

Ice, Et predict' R. R. ſilit', Et quoad predic 
Ft equum & patell? reſid predict? ]. T. & J. di 
0 tee caption predict proprietas equi | 
* rel 


— 


C 
\ 
( 


Replevin & Avowry! 922 
40 


ail ' reſid'-" fuir cuidam A. P. & proprietas 
0 predict patelle reſidꝰ tunc ſuit cuidam T. p. 
fo * non predict R. prout ipſe per breve & 
Jl JD ' fuaſuppon', Et hoc parati ſunt verificare, 


[ Unde' per Judic?. de brevi, &c. Et pro te- 


re torm hend', &. 

len Et predict R. dic” qd' breve ſuum predict Rep! al' re, 
Ke to' ne preallegat? callari non debet quia dic & Iiſue. f 
2008 quoad eoldem equum & patellam reſid', qd ' 


ee captionis predict ſact proprietas eorun. 
dem equi & patelle ſujt eidem R. in forma 
pre qua iple per breve & nart' ſua predict ſup- 
qui | % Et hoc pet q" inquiratur per Priam, 
"Y C |: predict ]. T . ſilit' Ideo, &c. 

t eit 
Pro 
jam! 
My 


Trin. 3 W. & Ma. Replevin Was ; of 
4 Cow, and a Stack of Hy, and a Pike 


of H a)» 


| HE Deſendant Fa makes Cognizance as | 
pp R T Bailiff to the Sheriff of Dr, and the — enn 
Þther two Defendants as the Bailiff 's Servants ; ; Zance as the 

” or that one Nat Day was poſſeſſed of them, Sheriffs Bai- 

„e and that the Defendant Dawſon levied a lifts. 

Plaint in the County Court againſt him upon a- 

>. Mpoſticies for a Debt of 14 / then ſecs forth a 

ia pieWrecepe to all the Sheriff 's Bailiffs to ſummon 

e equthe Defendant, and a Retorn of the ſaid Pre- 

preteſpept by the Defendant F. (but not ſhewn 

” apuFiow'executed,) then an Attachment per omnia 

pſt naen awarded, and Delivery thereof to the De- 
preeſſſendant FH. per * Cc. and fo make Cogni- 

us Velſ@ance. 

Prianſl Plaintiff pleads in Bar of che Avowry, -_ Bar al cogn'. 

predifie was poſſeſſed of the Cow, Oc. as of his 

K J. Apen proper Goods, and traverles that Day was 


qui . ofleſſed .of them as of his proper Goods. 
” pou 


2 , 2 e — . 
— 4 * 8 p "I 2 | *** — * %. 4 Ea 7 , ! — 
"A \ A 1 ＋ 8 - 6 a 5 - 26 _— * -% 5 8 ; * d, P 6 9 - 4 * _— : Ov". 2 E 
r "Mo * - - > v- 5 5 NG wh * ws arch _— 222 Nb t CO IMA, > 2 468 - 3 k e 
4 Low . — * a. 2 * — 1 3 k RT - — — 2 We T 
AS a 1» \ at 1 - « þ+ 
4 = 2 1 LA - 0 . — as #2» EY . apy p 8 
7 + — - 2 _— L LL 14 © 0 - 2 4 J 4 4 _ +a 
„% - M- 1 — 1 2 4 4 
* FY — — * » p * K * 
— — 4A — — 8 ** * 2 8 1 — * wm 


Ar A ¾ ROT Oe} POO 
. fx Sn. 3 K mo — * 
„„ M33 . œ . RY . [TT EEC 


Re pl LY 


53 Replevin & AvowWry. 
. Rep! al Bar, That he ſaid N D. was fo pa 
: R 
2 7 ſeſſed, &. and Iſſue thereupon, a Venue 3 

| warded, the Poſtea retorn?, and Verdict found 
for the Defendants, as to the Cow, Damapy 

2 d. Coſts 40 * Ideo nullo habito relpe&/M, 
| © ad duos denar* & quadraginta ſolid de dam 
nis & mis per Jur predict occo'ne caption 

| & detention vacce predict aſſeſſ quia lu 

Judgment pro © moi' dampna aut mis per Legem terre ui 
gs nullo c hoc caſu nullatenus adjudicand', Conſiden 


= Rec, * 29d tum eſt qq predict J. W. recuperet ver | 
2x K. n NJ F. T. & W. da' ſua predict occonif, 
* caption'.& detention predict ſtrige & meſh, 


* feni ad 40. & duos denar per Jur prediaſ 
4 © in forma predict aſſeſſ necnon 101.95. 100 
| _ © eidem J. W. ad requiſition' ſuam pro mis i 
© cuſtag? ſuis predict per Cur' hic de ind 

* adjudicat?, Que quidem dampna in toto 

© atting' ad 12 l. 10s. Et predict J. F. T. & 

5 2 * in mia”, &c. Cons eſt eciam qa” predidl 
Vaecam Kc. J. W. quoad caption & detention” vacy 
„predict nichil capiat per breve ſuum predict 

: C ſe ſit ſilit in mia pro flo? clamore ſuo ind 
Et predict' J. F. T. & W. eant inde fine di 
cc. Et qd habeant fetorn vacce predid 
detinend' ſibi irrepleg imperpum', Et quali 

* &c. Vic conſtare hic in Octab' ſci' Hill', & 

Et ulterius consꝰ eſt ꝗdꝰ predict' J. F. IT. & 

* recuperent vets prefat” J. W. dampna ſuac 

Nawpn' per © co'ne premiſs ad ſex Libr per diſcretionei 
. Ju- © juſtic hic eiſdem J. F. T. & W. ad requi 
wah © tion' ſuam pro mis! & cuſtag' ſuis per ipſos ind 
parte ſuſtent” juxta formam Statuti nuper ed 

* & provis per Cur' hic adjudicat, el 

© Vide 2 Lat. 1190, &c. Ws HE: 


Nota, e Vide 2 Lat. 1194. The Reporter there lay, 
the Coſts pio That the Judgment for the Defendant 2 f 


. 
* 


oo 


Replevin & Avowry. 339 
ſts, (for that the Verdict was found for them 


gpart) was not entred of Courſe, but upon a 
Wpecial Motion made by him in Court to that 


opoſe; and therefore the Caſe of Dem and 
Qu Jarſo (2 Cro. 473. alf Denton and Parſon, 2 Rolls 
* | op. 37. and 1 Brownlow I* 3.) was cited, 
wu y for Rent, the Plaintiff pleads Payment 
Wl: to Part, and an Accord for the other Part; 


nd one Iſſue is found for the Plaintiff as to 
the Payment by her pleaded, and the other 
pr the Defendant, viz. That there was no 
Ich Accord; and as to the Verdict for the 
antiff, Aſſid' da' ultra mis & cuſt' ad 4 d. Dampn & 
& pro mis, &c. 2 d. And as to the Verdict mu bro 
00 fr the Defendant, Afi Dampna ad 4 d, W . 
Et pro mis' ad 2 d. Et fuper hoc predict CORES Der. 
. P. (Def') pet judic' & dampna ſua pre- * 
oi dict' ac retorn' Averiorum predict de & 
"i ſuper Veredi&* predi& ex parte ſua reddit 
ſbi adjudicari, fed quia Cur', &c. Ad quem 
diem, (&c.) Cons eſt qd' predict Mi. D. 
lt) quoad predict” 24 l. nichil capiat per Quer' in mis 
breve ſuum predict ſed fit in mia? pro flo 
chamore fuo, Et predia* G. eat inde ſine 
die, Et habeat retorn' Averiorum predi&” 
detinend' irrepleg 1 _, Et ulterius 
cons' eſt qd? predict G. recuperet vers pre- 
dict M. dampna predict ex parte predict 
per Jur' predict in forma predict aſſeſſꝰ 
necnon 10 l. pro mig” & cuſtag' ſuis predict? Mis & euſtag 
lun eidem G. per Cur Domini Regis ex aſſenſu de * pe 
ſuo de incro' adjudicat', Que quidem damp- _ 
Ina in toto fe atting' ad 10 l. & 6d. Cons 
eſt etiam qd' predict M. D. de predict 
12 J. unde in forma predict agquietat” g.q Ouer' n 
exiſtit fit quiet', Et qd* eadem M. nichil ha- chil habeat de v0 
bo beat de 'dampnis & cuſtag' ex parte ſua per damp”, &c. | 1 | 
OF Jur' predict' in forma predict flit aſſeſſ Eo Eo dd, &e. 11 


1 9 
* * 1 4 vo 6 C d a 1 | i 
q TL | 
by 4 g A 
| 


549 


Replevin & Avowry. | 
* q& videtur eidem Cur? hic qq'. dampna x. 
* cuftag” ill minus rite Aſſeſſ ſuerunt. Mic 158 
Jacobi primi Rotlo. 458. B. R. Vide 2 Lu 
1196. Where the Reporter further obſerve 


That he has found great Variety, and ſometima o 


Some Notes 
from private 


Books. 


cap. 3. 2 Cro, 520, Samuel and Hodder's Cak 


(as it ſeem'd) ſome Contrariety in JudgmentsiniWy 
Replevin, when. Part is found by Verdict, «ff 
adjudged for the Plaintiff upon Demurrer, ani 
part 2 the Defendant; and for that, the P 
cedents which he found to be fo were in tu 
Books in private Hands; he there inſerts ſom i 
brief Notes thereof, and the rather, for that lth 
found not any ſuch Precedents in any other 
Book of Precedents. 5 1 

7. The firſt mentioned is in the firſt Book | 
ol Judgments, pag. 115. Trin. 9 Car. x. Thi 
Plaintiff had Damage and Coſts againſt o 
Defendant, and amerc'd as to the other, wu: 
Was acquitted, but no Damages or Colts foi 
that Defendant, becauſe by Law none ſuch ai 
to be adjudged. Be 

2, In the ſame Book, Trin. 11 Car. 1. when 
the Defendant had Damages and Coſts taxed 
for him by the Jury, upon Property pleadel 
as to a Calf; and the Plaintiff had Damage 
and Coſts for him upon another Iſſue, but n 
Reſpe& had in the Judgment as to the Dam 
ges and Coſts for the Calf, becauſe ſuch Dam 
ges and Coſts are nat to be adjudged by.. ihe 
Law, but the Plaintiff had Judgment for the 
Damages and Coſts taxed for him; and, the 
Defendant had Judgment, that he ſhould reco 
ver his Damages by reaſon of the Premiſſez 
&c, to fuch a Sum, according to the Statute 
which ſeem'd to be intended of 4 Fac. 


Pag. 204. | | 
| AD 


a. m GE DP ET VEE IEF. -— M$; a 


% 


| Replev in & Avbwry. 
nn the ſecond Book of Fudgments, Cc. pag. 
boy mmb. 9. judgment is there given for the 
Plaintiff, for the Damages and Coſts taxed by 
pe Jury, where Property of patt of the Goods 
bras ſound to be in the Plaintiff as Adminiſtra. 
dor, Cc. and for the Reſidue, that the Proper. 
V of them was in the Deſendant; and for the 
Reſidue the Plaintiff is amerc'd, and the De- 
lendant acquitted; but no Retorn is adjudged 
him, or any Damages or Coſts given to 
Im; but it appears not when the Judgment 
pas given, whether before the Stat. 4 Fac. 3. 
r Ko 
la the ſame Book, pag. 210. umb. 28. 
; here is another Caſe where one Iſſue to 
irt of the Goods taken, was upon a Non cepit, 
ookMind another Iſſue to the Reſidue of them and the 
Tue upon a Non cepit was found for the Plain- 
 oneff,. and the other for the Defendant; and ſe- 
whoWeral Judgments given for them both to have 
s loWamages and Coſts aſſeſſed by the Jury; and 
1 eis was before the Stat. 4 Fac. cap. 3: 

5. But that in the ſame Page, Numb. 29. 
vherWhe Avowry was for a Rent, and an Amerce- 
axent, and Verdict for the Defendant as to the 
2ad:(Ment, and for the Plaintiff as to the Amercia- 
nageſſhent; and Judgment was given, Qd' quer ni! 
ut naht, Cc. as to the Rent; and that the De- 
Jam! 


Jam! 
y.. the 
r. the 


d, tht 


| reco 
iſles 


catute 


ent; and that the Defendant ſhould have 
torn, &c. and his Damages aſſeſſed by 
e Jury, but no Damages or Coſts are given 
the Plaintiff. 7 | 

6. And that in the fame Book, pag. 211. 
mb. 31, A Joint Avowry was made of ta- 


ndant ſhould be amerced as to the Amercia- + 


fe all the Beaſts for 10 s. for an Amercia- 


544 


gc, ent 1 2 5. 1 d. for Rent, and 24. 24. 


Cale Relief; and for the Relict and the Amerce- | 


ment 


Li 


— ad CY" 
de SE . * — 5 
5 boy - 


n ; . A . 
5 42 Replevin & Avowry. ** 
ment two ſeveral Demurrers were joined, u 
an Iſſue was taken as to the Rent, and the Df 
murter for the Amercement; Judgment vi 
given for the Plaintiff, and for the Relief wi. 
the Defendant; and he had Judgment to h 
Retorn as to 24 s. for Relief, and the Plat 
tiff recovered no Coſts or Damages, forth 
the Avowry was 1 and the Defendarit h 
Cauſe of Diſtreſs. ho + 
J. In the fame Book, pag. 215. dumb. lf 
Two ſeveral Avowries were made for two ill 
veral Cauſes, viz. One for an Amerciamenth_ 
a Court Leet, and the other for another Cauli 
and the lſſue upon the Amercement was foul 

ſor the Avowant; and it was adjudged that 
ſhould have a Retorn of the Goods taken 
the Amercement, but no Damages or Coll 
becauſe they were not due by the Statute ul 
an Avowry for an Amercement in a Leet; i 
other Iſſue was found for the Plaintiff, and 
had Judgment for the Coſts and Dam. 
alſeſſed by che Jury. Tore, Theſe two pil 
vate Books are 1ſt and 24 Towns Judgmaſe⸗ 
Vide Town? and Cornwals Tables, Tit! Rey 
Why the Idem Lutw. 1198. It is noted; That the] 
Judgment in Ment in the principal Caſe of Wimard 
chis Caſe is Foſter, for the Plainriff and Defendant to hi 
different feveral Coſts, is different from any other Pri 
from others. dent before mentioned, in reſpect that WP « 
Awowry is joint, and one joint Iſſue taken W' 
on the Property of all the Goods; and d 
2 of the Goods, the Property is found ler 
in Day the Defendant in the Ackion in ee 
County Court; and as for the Reſidue, 

Property is found to be in the Plainciff. 
Note, as to the And it is there further noted, That in g 
two Books, of the Precedents in the aforeſaid Boo 
mentioned. Fadgmunts, is any Mention made in what Ct 

I 


| 
'S 


i Replevin & Avowry⸗ 543 
e Judgments were entred; but that tis pro- 
obe, chat the Judgments, mentioned in the 
W-cond Book of Judgments, were entred in 
. B. for that it is a Collection by Clerks de 
WT. B. Vide iſt and 2d Part of Townſend's Fu- 


. 


i © Vide de Property, 1 440d. Intr. 316. Hern 
69. Qd pro rietas Averiorum fuit Def? 
& non Quer, Et exit inde. 

„ Quoad partem qd?* proprietas ſuĩt Def? 
& non Quer', & quoad refid' non cepit. 
will 3 Brownl. 456. 

8 d' proprietas Vacce fuie al E. & non 
WQuer', Et proprietas 2 Juvencarum fuir al 
en & non Quer, Et pro retorn habend” ad- 

oocat. Raſt. Em. 568. 
wh. ck proprietas 1 Arietis fuic Def?, Et 
; : alios Arietes advocat pro dampno facto. 

WHern 4. 

uy . Quoad partem qq* proprietas fuit al ]. 
Def cepit ut ſerviens, Et pro refid” advo- 
„net, Repl' ꝗd' proprietas fuit Quer & non J. 
ene. Ent. 567. | 

ie Jut 
ard 1 
to 


re | Court of Record, with the Leave of the cap. 16. 


We Court, thay plead as many ſeveral Mat- 
thereto as he. ſhall think neceſſary for his 


Nete, As it is obſerved at the beginning of 
$s Head, That by the late Act for Amend. 


8. Bay 


of the Law, any Plaintiff in Replevin in 4 & 5 Anne, 


8 1 * i 23 2c 
5 r 1 


— 
2 | * 


Replevi & Avowry. 
| 544 _— * * 19,0 Rund 4 | bak 1 
= 8. Bar per Licen' Placitat', al Avail 


4 


| * | ind 10 — 
1 A Vowry: ut Ballisi F. Domini H. 
| | A pio dampu' act”, Bar per Licen 
1 6 placitat. | 
1 Bar. © Et predi& J. dic' qq* predict' S. rol 
4 _ ©, preallegat' captionem Averiorum predict 
| © predicto loco in quo, &c. juſtam cognoſc 
| © non debet, Quia dic” ꝗd' diu ante previ 
tempus quo ſupponitur caption Averionff 
© predict”, fteri & eodem tee quo, &. quid 
© W. W. Ar” fuic ſeit' & adhuc ſeit' exiſt 
& in predicto loco in quo, &c. in Domi 
| © ſuoutde-feodo, Et ſic inde feit' exiſten it; 
Licenc'. © W. W. ante predict' tenipus in quo, fp 
4 P * a * . Mo 4 
| dedit licenciam eidem J. ad Averia ſua n 
4 dict in ptedictum locum in quo, &c, ad 7 
bam in eodem tunc creſcen? de paſcend os, 
© nend', virtute cujus Licenc' idem J. pu 
ſcilt' predicto tee quo, &c. Averia ſua Mt 
© dit in predict locum in quo, &c. ad hy 
bam ibm' tun creſcen' depaſcend p 
© que quidem Averia predicto tee? quo, WW; 
© fuer in predicto loco in quo, &c. her; 
ibm tunc creſcen depacend* quouſq; preifiihh, 
S. poſtea ſcilt Die & Anno ſupradicto inn 
_ © predi\ſuperius ſpec, &c. apud A. pre 
1 in predicto loco in quo, &c. cepit Ar an 
* jpſius J. predict & ea injuſte detinuit cum 
Traverſe ſo- vad' & pleg' quouſque, &c. prout identhe 


lum & libum* c f ; > . 
UDETIUNS vers eum queritur Abſt * hoc 
Tentum'. 1 | q K Þ Wa 


* A 99 W 


© predict” Locus in quo, &c. fuit ſol ue 
libetum tentum' predict' F. dni' H. Gir 
© & C. B. prout predict S. ſuperius alleg Ei 
* hoc parat' eſt verificare, Unde ex quo he 
a : * dia? S. caption Averiorum predict in 

dicto loco in quo, &c. ſuperius cogn ide, 


i 


© als 
1 


1 Replevin & Avowry. 545 
W- pe jodic & dampna ſua oceo'ne caption” 
& . injuſte d:tention* Averiorum ill' ſibi adju- 
Seri, q 7 199 7 TOY, DE 
Et predict S. ut prius'dic*qd* predictꝰ Lo- Rep! far 
eus in quo, &c. eſt & predict? tee quo, &c. Traverſe. 
cſuit ſolum & ſibumꝰ tentumꝰ predict F. Do. 


way” 0" a 75 
* 2 1 1 12 1 I — ack 
2... ——yA— —— 
- "my 4 
1 r 


mini H. P. R & C. B. prout idem S: fupe. 
nos allegavit, Et hoc per qd” inquiratur per 


priam', Et predict' J. ſilit' Ideo, &c. vide = 
. Clifr's' Ext, 655, 656. Et poſtea Def, re- * 
ict cognitione & verificatione pretens', cog. 
novit actionem, Et breve Inquir' agard. 


. 2 Lat. 1241. Defendants make Conu- Bar by Li 

i Slance as Bailiff of F. B. for Damage feſant ; cence. 

har by a Licence under the Deviſee V. B. 

made to him by R. S. Lord of the Manor of 

7. to carry Coals to the High-way by the uſual 

Ws convenient Way, &c.. RepP, by which the 

WDeviſe to . B. is confeſſed ; but he ſays, That 

e the Time of the ſaid Demiſe, the Place 

Where, Cc. was Copyhold Land of the ſaidd Jl 

Manor; and that before the Demiſe, on Rep per 

i V, S. Lord of the Manor, granted the Locus Copyhold Sur- 

4 to T. T. and his Heirs, who ſurrendred d & ex- 
be Tenements to the Uſe of S. T. and his * 

WHeirs; That before the ſaid Demiſe the ſaid 

dir W. S. enfeoffed the ſaid R. S. to have to him 

and his Heirs, Ce. and that after the ſaid De- 

Wile the ſaid R. S. enfeoffed the faid S. J. of 

the Place in quo, &c. by which the Copyhold 

was extinct ; That he died ſeized, and that it 

deſcended to J. his Son, who enfeoffed tze 

id J. B. Cc. with an Averment, That at the Averment of 

alles Time of the ſaid Demiſe, or any Time before, 22 my 

quo he ſaid Mine in the ſaid Lime feld was not 8 Pen d. 

„in open d, & c. nor any Way from the ſaid Lime- 

zn ice ld to the ſaid High-way, Cc. 14. 1247. 

Nn Demurrer 


| 


7 4 
140 


. N * 


546 


That the 
Way was not 
of Neceſlicy, 
Cr. 


Demurrer by the Deſendants, and the Plan 


of the Copyhold Manor had not any Pow 


Replevin & Avowry. 


riff joins in Demurrer. | 

| 0bj. Upon the Argument it was objected hy 
the Defendant's Councel, That the Owners offi 
the Coal-mine in the Lime-field might not half 
any Way out of Delf H field, the Locus in quo, & 
becauſe, , at the Time of the Demiſe of thelf 
Coal-mine at B. he was a Copyholder in Fell 
of the Cloſe in quo, &c. And then the Loi 


to grant a Way over the Lands of the Copy 
holders in Fee, admitting that ſuch a Way ha 
been granted in the Leaſe of the Coal. mine 
expreſs Words; and alſo. it appears not in 
Caſe, that there was any abſolute Neceflinh 
That the Owners of the Coal-mine ſhould hai 
a Way over the Locus in quo, &c. For altho' ll 
Plaintiff, in his Bar to the Avowry, had iff 
ledged that tee quo, Cc. there was an uſu 
and convenient Way; yet it follows not then 
by, that it was a Way of Neceflicy, or th 
there was not a Way over the Lands whidf 
were in the Hands of the Lord of the Mani. 
at the Time of the Demiſe of the Coal-mine; 
and then it would be more reaſonable thy 
the Way ſhould be over them, than over th 
Lands of the Copyholders in Fee; eſpecial) 
it being averr'd by the Defendants in their N 
plication, That at the Time of the making 
the Leaſe of the Coal- mine no Coals wen 
digg'd in the Lime. field, or any Way overt 
Locus in quo, Cc. which is confeſſed by th 
Demurrer ; and if the Way is not of abſolut 
Neceſſity, then the Leſſee of the Coal. min 
or his Aſſigns, had no Way there; and ft 
that cited the Caſe of Pack.r and Welſted, 2 Si 
39, and 111. But in this Caſe it does not 20 * 
pear to be a Way of Neceſſity; and for tha, 


1 


| KReplevin & Avowry. 647 
at firſt the Court were of Opinion againſt the 

Plaintiff. 

ZBouc then it was moved, That when a Copy- If the Copy- 

Wholder in Fee purchales the Freehold and In- hold was ex- 

herieance of it, that the Copyhold was ex- tine by the 

ſtint; and thereſore the Grant of the Way, in Purchaſe. 

he Leaſe of the Coal- mine, might operate as 

Wwell as if the Loca in quo had been in the Hands 

pfthe Lord at the Time of the making of che 

Leaſe; and thereupon the Caſe was adjourned 

or another Argument, but that it was never 

Wrgued again, for that the Matter was c6m- 

Wounded, as the Reporter was inform'd by the 

Wactorney in the Cauſe. He alſo obſerves, That 

Wn the Replication in this Caſe there were two Feoffnent 

Feoffments pleaded without Conſideration, Ha- pleaded with - 

en al Hoffe & lour Heires, without ſaying to out Conſide- 

be Uſe of the ſeveral Feoffees, and their Heirs, on, ON 


| 


Wand this is ill. Idem 1247, 1248. 
Vide 2 Sannd, 321, Cc. The like Conu- 
ace ut Ballivi, as above, pro dampn fatÞ. 
W The Plaintiff pleads in Bar, and ſays, That 5 by Li 
„thin the Manor of Bliſland, ſunt & atee cuj us, TERED 
>, there were divers Cuſtomary Tenements, Cuſtomary 
Warcel of the ſaid Manor, demiſable by Copy Tenants to 
court Roll; and alſo a Cuſtom, that the put in his 
uſtomary Tenants, habuer & habere conſue- n.. 
eum ſolam & ſeperalem paſtur in predict locis in 
muibus, Cc. annuatim & quolibet anno per totum 
mu ad eorum libitum tanquam ad Tenta ſua 
Wrfomaria predict“ ſpectandz. And further the 

laintiff ſays, That the ſaid Cuſtomary Ta- 
ants gave him Licence to put in his Cattle 
nto the Place, where, & c. by Vertue where. 
he put in his Cattle, and the Defendants 
n their own Wrong took them, whereby he 
mays Damage, Cc. 


N n 2 Defer- 


848 Replevin & Avowry. 
Rep! & Tra- Defendants reply, That the Plaintiff de /al 
verſe le Cu- fort demeſne put in his Cattle, whereupon they 
Rom. took them, and traverſe the Cuſtom alledged 

by the Plaintiff, ; whereupon Iſſue was joined, 

and twas found for the Plaintiff, and his Dal 

mages and Coſts aſſeſſed; and afrerwarki 

Mr. Pollexfen moved in Arreſt of Judgment 

and took ſeveral Exceptions to the Bar of thei 

Avowry, which were anſwer'd by Mr. San 

ders; and all the Exceptions over. ruled opal 

= his Reaſons, except the laſt, which was, Tha 

1 a Copyholder cannot licenſe a Stranger to pu 
| That ſuch in his Cattle, unleſs ſuch Licence were by Deed, 

Licence and ſo twas held, Id. 326, 327. Alſo, Thalf 

ought to be the. Tenants of a Manor, who have Selam p. 

by D:ed. ſturam in the Lord's Soil, may by Deed licen 4 

* any other to depaſture there, but not withoulif 

= Deed. That the Copyholders of a Manor mi 

4 have ſolam & ſeperalem Paſturam in the Lori 

A | Soil, and exclude him, Id. 326, &c. and ſuch ei 

F Cuſtom adjudged good, Id. 328, That Copy 

buolders cannot altogether preſcribe again 
Preſcription their Lord himſelf, nor againſt any other, bt 

how. only in the Name of their Lord: That altho't 

Lord had not any Intereſt in the Herbage ; yall 

jf any other, who had no Right, put in his & 

A tle to depalture there, the Lord may diſtri 

| them Damage ſeſant, Id. 328. As to the la 

Exception, che Court were of Opinion, I 

Aid of Li- ſuch Licence could not be granted witboſen 

cence after Deed; but that after a Verdict upon an In 

Verdick. joined upon the Cuſtom it was aided by Suffne 

of Teoffails 3 for now it {tall be intended cher 

it was a good Licence granted by Deed, be 

the Deſendants have taken Iſſue upon anoth. / 

Point, for thereby they have admitted that . 

Plaintiff had a good and effectual Licence, n 

there was ſuch a Cuſtom within the Mane 


— nme 


A K 


' 


Replevin & Avowry. 548 


a as the Plaintiff had alledged; and now, that be- 
ing found that there is ſuch'a Cuſtom, the 

el Court will intend the Licence to be ſuch a good Judic pro 
ech Licence as the Law requires, and Judgment Quer'. 


Was given for the Plaintiff; 


en, © Vide Raft. Ent. 569. Nart' de Catallis ad- Bar per Li 

vel huc detent, Def”, dic qd ipſe ſeitꝰ de meſs? cencꝰ poners 
unde, &c. cepit & imparcavit Averia pro bone. 

8 dampnis fat” que nondum ſunt ſatisfact', 


val | 

ba Bar qd* Det? licenciavit quer ponere bona 
puff in meſs pro Conſervationee orundem, quam 
el diu quer' vellet. Repl i de 


Tu Avowry, Et traverſe Licence. Vid, 1 Co. 6 
pe © Vide poſtea Bar fur Title, & Bar per pre- 
oF ſcription. 


elle 
thou Ee vide 2 Ven. 225. Where the Avowry is Simile de 
mi nade for Rent reſerved upon a Demiſe of the Averiis. 


or hird Part of Lands. Bar, That V. being 
uch ſized of Two other Third Parts, Dedit hicens 


op, impon Averia, Et Demurr” inde. 
gain | 
a by '9. Bar pur Damage feſant, vide ante. 
no oy 


30 0. Bar ſur Title in Replevin G. Avomry. 
iſtra 
* fl Efendant pleads, That F. ſeized of the 
'D Place, in quo, c. demiſed to the De- = * 

N. endant for a 3 and ſo from Year to Year, 
1 Ind fo avows Damage. ſeſant: Bar by a fore 

Safer Demiſe made to the Plaintiff, and tra- 
ed therſes the Demiſe made to the Defendant. 
- whaPetendant demurs, 2 Ven. 215, 
ot . Replevin for ſix Steers taken by the Defen- R. makes Ti- 
hat (Fant, in a Place called Middlebam Moor; De- tle for Cat- 
nce, ndants avow as to four of the ſix, That the le Gates. 
Man befendant Robt. was ſeized of a Paſture ad 34 £ 
Nn 3 Beſtias, 


0 


8 


550 


| feodo & jure, and becauſe the ſaid two Steen 


Bar & De. 
murrer as 70 
four Steers. 


Cauſes. 


© predi&” R. J. & J. ſuperius non allegavet 
With ſeveral nec oſtendunt aliquam titlum' in predict Rl 


Replevin & Ayowry. | 
Beſtiat, Anglice 34 Cattle Gates in Loco wi 
guo, Qc. in Dominico ſuo ut de feodo; and be 
cauſe the ſaid four Steers were there Damages 
feſant, they diſtrained them ; And as to the ochgli 
two, That the Defendant J. H. was ſeized off 
eight Cattle Gates in Loco in quo, & c. NA. 


were there Damage-kelant, they diltrainef 
them. | 

To the 4vowry, viz. As to the four Steenfiff 
the Plaintiff demurs, © Et pro Cauſis eo qf 


per Conceflion' Preſcription” vel aliter haben 
vel claman' Paſtur' predia? pro 34 Beſtiis n 
* qualem Paſturam predi&? R. habet an folaniiſ 
© Paſturam vel coiam' Paſtur” nec oftendun 
quale fuit prejudicium Paſture predict', . 
non reliquens ſufficienꝰ Paſtur* pro Averif 
© ipſius R. ita qd' certus Exitus ſuperinde ju 
* poteſt, Aceciam placitando ſein am Paſtu 
in Dominico ſuo ut de feodo & Jure noi 


\ © clamanteslocum in quo, &c. Et quia pladiiſÞa 


Al refid*, that 
he the Plain- 


tiff is Lord 
of the Ma- 
nor, Oc. 


Rep!' per 
Ma inte- 
rance de 


Cattle Gates. 


tum predia” eſt in certum & caret ſormi 
And as to the Avowry for the two Steers, tel 
pleads, Thiat the Locus in quo is Parcel of thi 
Manor of M. of which Manor the Plaintilf 
was ſeized, & That there was ſufficient of: 
Paſture lor the ſaid Beaſts, and, for the Cattiihe 
of all others who had Right, Sc. Defendandſe 
join in Demurrer as to the Awvowry for the fou 

Steers: And as to the Bar to the Avowry f. 
the two Steers, they reply and maintain theiÞuc 
Av; and further ſay, That no Perſon bi 
ſuch as haye Cattle Gates, &c. have any Rig 
to put in their Cattle, &. That the DelenWhc 
dant H. and divers other Perſons, were ſeizeiſd 
and poſſeſſed (bad Pleading, as is * 75 D; 
Y erw 


Replevin & Avowry. 551 
0 wilery'd) of 217 Cattle. Gates, &. To which it 

be ppertain d to have the ole and ſeveral Paſture, 

e. And that the Plaintiff was not ſeized or 
Poſſeſſed of any Cattle-Gates, Cc. per quod, 

Pe. And traverſes that there was fufficient 

Paſture for the eight Cattle, and the Cattle of 

&ll others who had Right, &c 2 

Te Plaintiff demurs, and for Cauſes, Eo qd' Demur'. 
placitum ill? eſt deceſſus ab Advocar & Cog- 


teen nition' ſuperius inde placitat', Eo qd” In- 

qi junio Traverſie predict facit Traverſiam ill 

ave! mie neceſſar?, Et placitum ill eſt repugnans. 
Vie 2 Zur. 1157. 

bei Upon the Argument the Opinion of the The Avow- 
bout was, That the Avowries were ill, be. ries ill. 
olanMWauſe no Title was ſhewn, either by Grant or 


reſeription, to the Cattle. Gates, as per Co. 


. 121. 4. 2 Leon 74. 
ven An Objection was made, That they who If Cattle. 
* Dad Cattle-Gates had an Eſtate in Fee in the Gates be Fee. 
ſtun 


| nds themſelves, in which, Cc. But the 

noi Court anſwer d, That they took no Cogni- 

placWance of it. | 
mall Another Objection was, That in the Bar to What Lande. 
5, lhe Avowry, as to the two Steers, the Plaintiff 3 * 
fad alledged that he was ſeized in Fee of the | 
intilfManor of M. of which the Locus in quo, c. 

nt Mras Parcel; and ſo it might be, and yet not 

Dathe Soil of the Plaintiff, but the Soil of a free 
danifWenant of the Manor, Sed non allocatur, for no 

 foufF.and is Parcel of the Manor, but only the 

ry emeſnes of the Manor, and the Plaintiff had 
chenludgment, 2 Lat. 1161. 

n bi Vide 3 Living 104. In Replevin, the Defen- Where ſpeci- 
Rigi ent avow'd for Damage-felant in his Common; *! 33 
elenlhe Plaintiff demurr'd, and the Avowry adjudg: alledged Wo 
eized$d ill, becauſe he had not alledged any ſpecial commoner. 
e olWamage to himſelf, and the Court would take 


v' Nu 4 no 


555 


no Notice of two Precedents, cited-forthe Dey | 


Sp & Ayowry. 


fendant, out of Raſt. and Cooks Entries, they 
being without Argument, and held the Lay 

all one in Avowry as in an Action on the Case 
becauſe Commoners can no more diſtrain, tn 
have an Action on the Caſe, without alledging 


that he is. endamaped in his: Common: Alli 


there was another Exception to the Avown, i 
vid. He preſcribed pro commani paſtura, and nit . 
pro conmmunia paſture, and upon both Excep' 
ons Judgment ws againſt the Avowant,' 


Bir by Title 


from another 
Guardian, 


R., Ll Cu- 


and the n was adjudged good. 


Cognizance « as Bailiff of 4 Corporation. 


Dem, Leuinx 109 & 107. Defendant mak F 


Conuſance as Bailiff of a Corporarion,iþa 
without ſhewing how they were incorporated, i 
and without ſhewing their Precept in Writing iſo 


eee as Bailiffs of Infants, aud their 


| Guardian, &c. 


Ide 2 Lut. 1181, Cc. Rerle vin for raking 


two Hotſes in a Place called Dover N 
The Defendants make Cognizance, as the Bai 


liffs of Mary and Elixabetb Sawill, and theit 
Guardian Mary Bennet. Bar al Cogs', That * 
Infants Father committed their Cuſtody 

other Guardians, and derives a Title by a De 
miſe from the 'other Guardian. The Defen- 


dant by Replication confeſſes the Grant to 7. 


Brother of the Infants; and that the Locus de: 
ſcended to the Infants as Siſters and Cohei-s d 
the ſaid F. S. But he further ſays, Eo q ſecun. 


ſto for Der dun Conſuetud, c. it belong'd to him to aflign 
a Guardian to ſuch Infants, he at ſuch a Cow! 
) by 


* 


fendant to aſ- 
fign Guai di- 
Ans. 


m 


» 


| Replevin & Avowry. 863 
F Copy admitted, and affign'd the faid Mary 7 NOM 
B-mmet robe Guardian to the ſaid Infants, and 


hat he then admitted the ſaid Infants as Heirs to 
heir Brother. Plaintiff demurs, Eo qd Conſue- 


and i» placito ill ſpec eff minus apte placitat ac in 

09 le in/ifficier” ac incerta, ac tota materia ibm con- 

nn i Advocar predict contineri debuit, &c. 

07, Wide 2 Lut. 1187. Where *tis obſerv'd, That 
tens Caſe is briefly reported in 3 Levinz 395. By Lev. Rep; 


In which tis ſaid, That upon long and intricate only one 
P!cadings, and not well pleaded, one Point Point was re- 
u was refolv'd by the Court, without Regard ſolved. 
Pocher Defects in the Pleading ſcilt', That a 

; Wopybolder is not within the Statute 12 Car, 2. 

akes J cilpoſe of the Cuſtody of che Infants, "but 

ion at the Cuſtody ſhall be to the Lord, or 

ted, Withers, according to the Cuſtom of the Ma- 

ing or, as to the Copyhold Lands for the Prejudice 

hat may be to the Lord, and for the Meannels 

the Eſtate, vide 3 Lev. 395. But Serjeant 
ebe, who was for the Plaintiff, is not 

ell pleaſed with this Report, and ſhews four ged four other 
ther Points which were argued, with the par- poinrs, per 
Kcular Reſolutions upon them: Theſe being Lutw. Rep. 
kingWilwer'd, Two other Exceptions are alſo by &C. 
Nm mentioned. And he further obſerves, 

Bei bat this Argument was made Paſch. 5 W. & M. 

theiſpd then it was ordered to be argued again, 

at theWur never was; yet that in Micbaelmas Term, 

iy OW. & M. it was entred for the Opinion of 

Dee Court the next Term, and ſo it continued 

Deſen nil Eaſter Term 6 W. & M. and then Judg. Judic' pro 
7. ent was given for the Defendant. ; Def". 

us de He further adds, That Chief Juſtice Treby 


THI | briefly deliver the Opinion of the Court: 

ſecun-F 1. That a Lord of a Copyhold Manor had Opinion of 

aſſigiſpt any Power by chez Common Law, without a the Court. 

(ou | paoar⸗- f 
0 


554 


Cogn'. 


Bar by Grant 
of a Fair un- 5 | 
der the Great ſeized in Fee in the Right of her Dutch 


Seal. 


Demut“, 


How the 
Stat. con- 
cerning the 
Seal of Lan? 
extends. 


Replevin & Avowry. 
particular Cuſtom, to grant the Guardianſhipqſf 
an Infant Copyholder within his Manor. Wh 

2, That here was ſuch a Cuſtom well yf 
ledged ; and, 

3. That the Statute did not deſtroy the V. 
lidity of the ſaid Cuſtom, or extend to a Copy 
hold as to this Particular; for that it would 
an Alteration of the Cuſtom, and might bl 
prejudicial to the Lord, Cc. 


Bar al Cognizence by Bailiffs, That thi 
Plaintiff bought the Sheep in a Fair with 
in the Dutchy of Lancaſter. 


: Ide > Lut. 1233. Replevin for takin? 
1 V Sheep in the gb free in — 1 
Com? Nort ht; Defendant makes Cognizancewl 
Bailiffs of the Earl of Nottingham for Damage 
felant. Bar iude, That Queen Elizabeth bein 


of Lancaſter, by her Letters Patents unde; 
her Great Seal granted to the Bailiffs, r. 
D. two Fairs in the Year, &c. And that il 
Plaintiff, at one of the ſaid Fairs, bought tall 
laid Sheep, and paid the accuſtomed Toll 
and that thereupon the ſaid Sheep being in hi 
Cuſtody in the ſaid Fair, the Deſendants u 
juſtly took it, G. Defendants demur, ani 
the Plaintiff joins in Demucrer. | 
And Judgment was given for the Blaintilf 
The Chief Point ariſing upon the Statut 
3 H. 5. num. 15. ſtiled Statut figil” Lancafi 
tangen, by which 'tis enacted, That no Gif 
c. ſhould be but under the Dutchy Seal: ÞB 
the Court were of Opinion, That the Statu 
extended only to the Poſſeſſions of the Dutch 
and Things naturally ariſing from the Land 0 
as a Rent, Way, Mill, Fiſhery, and the " 


1 
Ir, 


| Replevin & Avowty. 588 
ut not to Things granted by Prerogative, as 
his was, being a Fair newly created; and fo 
vas concluded, That Poſſeſſions ought to 
aß under the Dutchy Seal; but Royal Fran. 
hiſes (as a Fair is) out of the County Palatine, 
Bod within the Duxchy, ought to paſs by the 
Wreat Seal, and fo Judgment was given for 
e Plaintiff, Id. 1237. | 
| The Reporter there obſerves, That a Pre- How of a 
entation to a Church, the Advowſon whereof Preſentation 
longs to the Dutchy, may be under the 9 Avoid- 
reat Seal, but the Grant of the next Avoid. 
ce of ſuch Advowſon may not be under the 
reat Seal, but ought to be under che Durchy 
al, 2 Rolls Abr. 182, Let. D. num. i & 2. 
| N Brownl. 182, 
Ther in the Caſe of Carpenter and Marſhall, How of 3 
Linz 28 & 29, and 1 Sid. 189, and TO 
VYnond 9o. It is reſolved per tot Cur?, That 
We Reverſion of Dutchy Lands ly ing out of the 
Wutchy Palatine, by the Seal of the Dutchy, may 


be, g without Attornment; and that the Grant 
at uche Dutchy Seal is a Grant by Record, and 
bt U ſes the Reverſion as a Fine, ſcill' to veſt the 
Tol tate without Attornment; but if the King 


make a Feoffment of it, Livery ought to be 
in the Caſe of a Subject, for it may be done 
an Attorney. 


es for $20 J. due for half a Year, Oc. Bar, 
; That 


4 
| 
4 


. —— C_s 
v 

= 

. 0 


3586 


Bar, the Leaſe 
was avoided 
by Parlia- 
ment. 


Avcwry for a 
Rent Charge 
granted to his 
Wife dum * 
Jolas, Cc. 


\ 


Alf the 
Rent did 
ceaſe by her 
Inter-marr1- 


age. 


It ſeems not, 
the 100 J. 
unpaid. 


ſendant ſays, That R. and L. being ſciastia 


and the ſaid Rent Charge penitus ceſſaret, a 


7 


ac. 
4 


. Replevin & Avowry. 
That certain Perſons, ſitting as the Uppe 
Houſe of Parliament, did order, that the Dl 
miſe made to G. ſhould be cancelled, and thy 
their Proceedings were confirmed by the Ad 
Oblivion, 12 Car, 2. cap. 11, 13 Car. 2. ca, 
Whereupon the Defendant demurs, and Jud 


ment. was given for the Defendant. V 

1 Saund. 187, 188, Oc. | # 
In 2 Saund. 195. In Replevin for taking H 

Cattle, Defendant avows for a Rent Charge 

12 J. deviſed to bis Wife dum ſola during Me 

natural Life, wich a Clauſe of Diſtreſs; bui 

it appeared that the ſaid Anne ſhould be mati 


that then his Executor ſhould pay her 199 


ſhould retorn to his Executors R. S. That i 
Deviſor died, and that afterwards the ly 
Anne married the Avowant; and that the 100 
after the Marriage was not paid, for which. 
diſtrain'd, and avows for all the Rent art he 
alter the Marriage: And the Queſtion wir 
Whether by the Marriage the yearly Rel 
ſhould ceaſe ipſo fadlo, or until the 100 l. ſhoil 
be paid? And the Court agreed with the 0 
fendants Councel, That there was no Reald 
that the Rent ſhould be diveſted without 
Payment of the ſaid 100 J. contrary to the l 
tent of the Will, and of the Deviſor; where 
the Deviſee had not committed any Act to & 
ſtroy ſuch Intent: Whereupon they conclud 
for the Avowant, That the Rent did not ce t| 
by the Marriage until the actual Payment of ien 
ſaid 100 J. And thereupon judgment Du 
given for the Avowant by Rainsford and Mom 
Juſtices, againſt the Opinion of Twiſa 
2 Saumd. 200. 

Vide 2 Ven, 145, Cc. In Replevin, Din: 


n OE TRE LIE TED > en 


A 


| 8 1 0 4 
| Replevin & Avowry. 557 
Wl 2 Meſſuage & Lands, granted a Rent Upon Grant 
Fharge in Fee to the Detendant's Grandfather, * Rent 

ho bequeath'd the ſame to the Deſendant's Rn 8 
ather, who granted the ſame to the Defen- 

ant, who avows for the Arrears of the ſaid 

Kent. | | By Mayor 

all Vide Clift. 642. Avowry by Mayor and Bur- and Burgeſſes. 
Welles for a Rent arrear, ſuper terras, charged by 

= Grant thereof to them made. | 

. © Simile Id. 650. Et Bar qq' non con- 

ceflit. Vide eund' 651, 644. 


cri gniZance as Bailiff" upon a Rent Charge to 
o Man and his Wife, with a Proviſo, 


an | and Penalty with Clauſe of Diſtr eſs. 


i U 
fl | Eplevin for taking his Cattle. Deſen- 
oY dant makes Cognizance as Bailiff to 
chi K. Adminiſtrator. of J. K. the Subſtance 
arceMhereof is; That G. G. and R. C. by Inden- 
| wire (after a long Recital in it of the Laſt Will Grant. 
Re one . C.) granted a Rent Charge of 20 J. 
hour 4rmum to J. K. and J. his Wile, and to the 
e Dikirs-of the Wife, upon a Proviſo and Agree. 
cealWent, That the Rent ſhould be paid to them 
ut icing their Lives, and after their Deceaſe to 
he Ie Uſe of the Child or Children. of the 
here iſe then living, until the Females attain'd 
to deir Age of 18, and the Males 21; and if 
clude Grantors ſhould pay to them at the Day 
t ceal their ſaid Ages 300 l. equally amongſt them, 
of en the Grant to be void; but if Default, &c. 
t u uld be, then they granted to the ſaid Husband 
Wife, and the Heirs of the Wife, a Rent Penalty. 
harge of 4 J. per Aunum as a Penalty with 
auſe-of Diſtreſs. That they had Iſſue Three 
„ Dos, . X. R. K. and T. XK. That the Eldeſt 
(ci2Mtain'd bis Age of 21, whereby 100 . 
| 0 


7 : „ XS FY 


558 Replevin & Avowry. 
of che 300 /. became due to him, which . 

Cognizance. not paid. That the Husband died, and aft 
wards the Wife died; and becauſe 40 7. of 

ſaid Rent of 4 J. was Arrear in the Liſe-timeſ 

the Husband, the Defendant makes Cognizan 

as Bailiff of V. K. the Adminiſtrator of 7 

Hereupon the Plaintiff demurred, and the Dl 

Demurrer. fendant join'din Demurrer. 2 Lat. 1151, of 


Upon the Argument two Points we 
moved. 


2 Whether x, Whether the 47. per Annum was 2 new Ry 
the 4 l. was 2 diſtinct from the Rent of 20 l. per Annum, o 
___ di. Nomine Pzne annexed to the ſaid Rent of 1 
in&, or a | » ; 2 
Nomine Pane and this was a material Queſtion; for if it un 
annexed. Nomine Pane, then it had been clear, that i 
Adminiſtrator of Joan could not diſtrain for 
Arrearages of it, as Co. Litt. 162. b. But int 
the Court was not agreed, for the Chief Jui 
held that it was a Nomine Pænæ; but two od ſl 
Judges were of another Opinion, for that 
annual Sum of 4 /. was not to riſe upon i 
Non-payment of the Rent Charge of 20 l 
Annum to T. R. and Joan his Wiſe, but fort 
Non-payment of a Collateral Sum, wiz. 10 
to William their firſt Son, when he ſhould 
tain the Age of 21; and a Nomine Pengis 
ways given and created upon Non- pay men 
Rent before granted; and altlio' it is menti 
ed inthe ſaid Indenture, That the 4 | per Am 
ſhould be paid as a Forſeiture or Penalty, | 
it is to be intended as a Forfeiture or Penalyl 
Non-payment of the ſaid Collateral Sum 
x00 J. to W. the eldeſt Son, when he ſhall 
2. If the At- come to the Age of 21. 
* — 2. The other Point was, That admit 
_ + fog that ic was an independant Rent per ſe, if | 
tor of the Arrearages, which incurr'd in the Liſe- tim 
Survivor. | 


; 


it - 


3 


ES or ttt. ets 


r — 


5 


ll, 


KReplevin & Avowry. 559 
| K. and J. his Wife, ſhould come to the Ad- 

Winiſtrator of F. who ſurvived him; and in 

hat the whole Court was agreed, that they be- 

Wng'd to the Adminiſtrator of J. and they 

Frounded their Opinion upon Temple and 

emples Caſe, 3 Cro. 791. and Carew and Bur- 

5 Caſe, 1 Rolls Abr. 350, numb. 8. but no 


pogment was ever given in the Caſe. 


1 


RY 


EE 2 Lat. 1227, Cc. Replevin for ta- Con upon a 
1 king the Plaintiff's Cattle in the Stable, Rent Charge 
Agg. Defendants make Cogaizance as Bailiff to the Teſta- 
"SR. K. Executor of F. K. That the Locus in dor. 
I. . is Parcel of the Manor of T. and that 
i William Earl of Strafford, ſeized in Fee, thereof 
oh | by Indenture grant a Rent Charge to the 
0W&\tator of 60 J. per Annum iſſuing out of the 
1at inn . . 

Id Manor for the Life of the Grantee, with a 
7 Wauſe of Diſtreſs for Non-payment within 20 

ys, being lawfully demanded ; and then ſets 
th the Laſt Will of the Grantee, and his 
ath, and che Diſtreſs for Rent Arrear ; the 
intiff demurs; Eo 4d non apparet per Copni- Demur. 
ill ad predidꝰ 1020 l. unquam mandat fuer 
aliqua pars inde unquam demandat fuit. 
pon the Argument, The Plaintiff's Coun- That this 
inſiſted, That Executors of Tenant for Caſe is with- 
> were not within the Statute of 32 HH. 8, in the Sta- 
17. And that the Statute is to be intended tute pro E. 
Executors pur auter vie, during the Life of 
uy que vie, and cited 4 Co, 48. Ognel's Caſe, 
„. 162. 8, & b. 5 Co. 118. Edrich's Caſe; 
iwas reſolved that this Cafe is within the 


1 ate. . 
time Then 


—— 


pnizance as the Bailiff of an Executor 
for Rent Arrear to the Teſtator. 


— 


— — ů — — 6 = . 2 > 


— LAM 


r 


> 


* Þ 


ie the Lands Then he took an Exception to the Cogui⁊ dal 


be not charg- hecauſe it is not thereby ſhewn in what I,;oif 
ed, the Plain- 


tiff ought to 
ſhew it. 


Cogn'. 


Deſcent to 
faur Sons. 


Replevin & Avowry, 


ſon's Time the Rent became due, or that iii 
Land remain'd in the Seiſm of any one ul; 
ought to pay Rent, or in the Hands of aff. 
other who claimed under him by Dura 
Gift or Diſcent, as the Statute mentions, wil | 
then cited the Caſe of Miles and Jill 
3 Cro. 547. Sed non allocatur, for if the Lai ; 
in which, Cc. are not charged with the | 

ſtreſs, it ought to be ſhewn by the Plain 

and ſo the Defendants had Judgment by 


Opinion of the whole Court. 2 Laut. 1230. 


Coon for A Fourth Part upon 4 Rent Ch 
granted out of Land, being of the Tel 
of Gavelkind, inter Oſmer & Sheafl 


. CEE 2 Lt. 1205, Replevin for four Gf 
ings, a Mare, a Cow, and a Heil 
Defendant makes Cognizance as Bailiff of 
Wilmott, for that one F. C. being ſeized in 
de loco in quo, &c. granted to M. T. and his H 
an annual Rent Charge of 14 J. &c. whod® 
and it deſcended al M. . That M. V. coventf 
ed with Sir . B. her Couſin, to ſtand {ll 
to the Uſe of Sir V. B. and his Heirs, it 
ſaid M. V. ſhould die without any Child 
her Body, and living aſter her Death; 1 
ſhe died without Iſſue, and Sir V. B. grat 
the laid Rent Charge to I. V. and, his H 
That the Tenant of the Freehold attor 
N. V. died ſeized; and it deſcended to his 
Sons, of whom Dan. was one, the Land, 
all Rents Charge iſſuing thereout, being d x 
Tenure of Gravelkind ; and for the FA. 
Part of the Rent Arrear he makes Cognizar” 


7 

| Beplein & Avowry: 581 ö 
The Plaintiff demands Oyer of the Indenture = 

. Covenants of AM. V. to ſtand ſeized, &c. Fg ; 
Ind then detniirs upon the Cognizance. Vidg Demir. | j 
4 . Lr. 12 10. and vide 3 Lev. 370. where this Caſe = 
reported; the Effect of the Deed being, vis. p | 
give and grant Lands to my Couſin, and his Subſtance-of i 

* Wicirs, to hold to him and his Heirs, iſl Jie with. the Grant. | 


: 

Dat a Son of my Body living at my Deceaſe. | 
p Ind the whole Queſtion was, If this Deed 1 
4 ould enure as a Covenant to ſtand ſeized; =_ © 
int Ind upon ſeveral Caſes cited, it appeared, That : | 
later Times they had more Conlideration 7 | 
che Subſtance that is to paſs the Eſtate, than io Soma fob 

[the Shadow, ſcilt?, the Manner of paſſing i it ; che Tosa | 


ut it was then adjourned, and aſterwards ad- li. 


Ch | 
Wdzed for the Conuſant. Id. Lev. 372. See 
| 


Ten 
af Irther, 2 Lut. 1210. where. "vis. obſerved, | 
"Wha there is one Point in this Cognizance 1 
Which he thought worthy of Obſervation, Q ba : | 


Which is, if the Cognizance in this Caſe is good, Cognizznce 


0 


901 Peauſe tis in the Name ang Right of a Co- be good. 'Y 
” Witner only tor bis Proportion of the Rent; 
Wh Ir in Page and Stedman's Caf, Mich. 7. N. 3. 


ER in Replevin, the Deſendant makes Cog- 
Wzance as Bailiff to Jobn Bennet, and Grace his. 
ite, for the Moiety of a Rent, reſerv'd upon 
Neaſe for Years, made by Simon — to. 
rifith, of certain Lands; the Reverſion of 
hich, by the Death of Bennet, deſcended to 
Ne (41d © and to the Countels of Salisbury: 

Widgmenc upon Demurrer. for this Cauſe was: 
ren. for the. Plaintiff. And in the Caſe of 
len and Palmer, Trin. 6. W. z. B. R. Rot. 
9. it was adjudged upon Demurrer, That a 
int. Tenant cannot avow for a Rent. Charge Hon a Joint 
bout making himſelf Bailiff to his Compani- Tenant 
0 Tenant 4277 
, ex relatione Mri⸗ fervien, Carthew in both ſhould avow. 

0 the 


/ „ 


11ZAN 


9 "Ts FA * * 9 " | - : : — p es * N - ”F f 
« * * 777 bs Tg c d 


562 Replevin & Avowry. 
the Caſes: But this Point was not moved inf 
| this Caſe of Oſmer and Sheafe. | 
1 Remainder of Vide 2 Lat. 1218. Weeks Vers Peach, where 4 
| 2 Rent 4 the Opinion of the Court was for the Avoy. 
* ant; for they held, That a Remainder migh 
well be of a Rent de Novo; and alſo, That by 
a Recovery in the Cale, the Eſtate in the Rey 
was enlarged, and that the Recoverer thereh | 


was in of an Eſtate in Fee. ſimple, which werf 
all the Points in the Caſe. Id. 1224. 


12. Bar pur Rent ſur Demiſe, Gc. 


Vide ante, Bar per Licence, Et Bar ſur Title. 


Awvowry under Aſſignment of a Leaſe made 5). 
Mayor, Bailiff, and Commonalty, and Bar pf 
non dimilit. | 

| 


4 Avowry. * 2 Saund. 309, &c. Replevin for taking li 
1 1 Cattle; Defendant avows, for that M 
4 Mayor, Bailiffs, and Commonalty of the Ci.“ 
6 of Coventry, and one Million, and others, wen p 
1 ſeized of the ſaid Manor, unde, &c. and being 

4 ſo ſeized, demiſed the ſame to T. B. for Year 
3 who aflign'd to the Defendant, who dem. 
= {ed Part thereof to the Plaintiff, rendring Rent, 


1 Bar. and ſo avows for Rent Arrear. Plaintiff plead k 
4 in Bar, That the ſaid Avowant, predicto prim 
1 die Nov, Anno Regni Regis nunc 18 ſupraditi0, jy 
'J apud F. veter predid non dimiſit modo & form, 


Ce. Et hoc, & Unde, &c. And fo the Plan 
tiff makes the Day and Place of the Demiſe tt 
Rep. be Parcel of the Iſſue. The Avowant replies 
pe That he. upon the ſaid firſt Day of Nowembe 
Anno Regis nunc 18 ſupradicto, demiſed to th 
Plaintiff modo & forma prout, Cc. Er deb 


pon 


Replevin & Avowry. 563 
us [+ ſuper Priamꝰ. Et predict Quer fili. Add 
Pon the Tryal the Jury found that the Avow- 

Int infra ſcript” primo die Nov Anno 18 infra Verdict pro | 


* | rips” apud F. predict non dimiſit, EXC. modo & quer. 
0 , prout, Cc. and aſſeſs'd Damages and 
el for che Plaintiff in C. B. 

| 


+ D<tcndant brings a Writ of Error in Banco Etror, 
5 i; and Error aſſigned upon making the 
"Way and Place Part of the Iſſue; and the Verdict 
plied, That the Avowant had demiſed, but 
t upon the Day and Place in the Declara- 
Jon; and ſo the Subſtance and Merits of the 
Waule was not tried, and that was the Default 
che Plaintiff himſelf in his Bar to the Awvowry: 
Ind the Caſe of Sandback and Turney, Cro. 
Ec. 585. and other Caſes, were cited. 
On the other Side it was urged, That the 
ue and Verdict was aided by the Statute of 
il, 32 H. 8. cap. 30. according to the 
Wales, Ao. Rep. 695. Cro. Fac. 251, &c. But 
Thief Juſtice Hales took two Exceptions to the f 
ry, viz, (i.) That the Avowant al'edged 1. Exception 


Ul | 8 _ 7. 
* Hat the Corporation of C. and one Million, * Ts 
„d other natural Perſons, to be ſeized in Fee Tenants. 


che Manor, unde, &c. Whereas a natural 

ron and a Corporation cannot be Joint- 

enants, or jointly ſeized of any Lands, as by 

it. Cap. Tenants in Common. (2.) That ,, por not 

et Avowant had not laid the Leaſe at B. by averring the 

1, preß Averment in Fact, but by a Teffatum Leaſe made. 
ie, which is not good Pleading, and there- 

We the Avowry was ill, which was granted by 

je whole Court; and the Court took Time 

adviſe thereon ; and it was moved, that here 

e Court might reverſe the Judgment, and 


= vard a Repleader, and the Parties might re- 
„ lead here in this Court; for it was urged, 


an hat they ought to make the ſame Award, and 
| Oo2 give 


1 


| 564 Replevin & Avowry. 
| naive the ſame Judgment as the Common- Beni 
| | ought to have done. Rolls 1. 744. And aſterwark i ep 
| at another Time, the Court delivered their Opgp® 
| nion; and the Chief Juſtice was of Opinion et 
If che Iſſue That the Iſſue and Verdict were aided by p 
G and Verdict Statute of Feofails ; but Twiſden contra; and thalf s 
| were aided. it was not aided by any Statute of Feofaili: Au 
| ChiefJuſtice Hales ſaid, That inantient Tine): 
| was the Uſe to award a Repleader upon a Wi PI 
E of Error in this Court; and that he had peru 
No Replea- divers antient Rolls (there mentioned) iff bc 


| 

4 der. which a Repleader is ſo awarded; but that ie 
was obſolete, and not uſed at this Day; aH 
1 And that this that in the Caſe at Bar the Judgment could ng . 
E Judgment be reverſed for the Faults in the Avcury aue 
F could not be peradventure, (he ſaid) That the Plaintiff tl 
4 reverſed. made his Plea in Bar ill, on purpoſe to di 
= - the Avowant to demur to it: And that tl 
1 Amvowry was inſufficient, and for the Infuffici'? 
4 | ency thereof Judgment ought to be, fol or 
=, the Plaintiff's Declaration is good, and fo tif 


$o Judgment Judgment was affirmed, altho it was pray d th 


afficmed. it might be rever ſed, and the Party Avowaf W 
reſtored to his Action. Vide 2 Saund. 3 19. WM? 


Avomry for Damage Feſant. Bar by a De 
miſe. Repl', That it was upon RendiWtt 
of Rent, and Entry for Non-paymen ot 
Rejo', That he was ready to pay, auff. 
traverſes Demand of Reat, and I 8 
upon the Traverſe, 


Avowry. R lane: for taking his Cattle, one Defenii, . 

dant pleads non cepit; the other avows a 1 

Bailiff of the Dean and Chapter of Gloucefer ſo ' 

| f Damage - Fe ſant in their Fee. Bar by a Demi. 

Bar. to J. V. and a Grant by J. V. to the Pian . 
b 74 


| 8 055 3 655 a | Ma i 
NY Replevin & Ayowry, 565 
, That the Demiſe was with a Render of | f 
ent, and a Demand made, and Entry ſor ; 

on-pay ment. Rejoinder, That he was ready Rejo. 
4:8Þ pay, and traverſes the Demand. | 
bu 


— 


Et predict' J. G. ut prius dic? ꝗd' predict Swrejo'. 
J. W. & H. H. virtute Warranti predict“ 
predicto 22 die Jan Anno 1x ſupradicto 

ven ad predict' apertum locum infra predict 
bhoſcum vocat' B. qui eſt communis via du- 

eens a W. vers' B. dimid' unius hore prox” 

ante occaſum ſolis ejuſdem diei & ibm' per- 
Wmanſerunt uſq; ad & poſt occaſum ſolis ejuſ- 

em Diei petendo nomine predict Decan' & 
Capitli' & ad uſum eorundem Decan & Ca- 

Wicl' predict“ 48 s, de predict reddit' 9 J. Iſſue. 

W 12 s. prout ipſe ſuperius allegavit. Et de 

oc, &c. And Verdict and Judgment was for N 
* Plaintiff, Vide 2 Lut. 1138. Intr. Mich, 
& 16 Elix. Rot. 2134. 


Where the Reporter ſays, That he had writ- 2 

pa brief Abſtract of the ſaid Record out of a —— by 
anuſcript of Juſtice Warburtcn, under which 
᷑re the Words (to the Effect) enſuing, written 

"Wh his own Hand, videlt'. Note, That this 

atter was divers Times moved in the Court 

Won joining of the Iſſue, and the Court was 

ary of it; whereupon the Lord Dyer took the 

ok, and made the Iſſue upon the Demandant, 

ſupra manu ſua propria, and Harper and Moun- 

Juſtices, put their Handsto it, quod rarum ; 

heſenl for that Rarity the Reporter had enqui- 

ws into the Record at large according to the 

ger fot thereof; and that the Lord Dyer himſelf 

demi es mention of the Pleadings in this Caſe, 


intiſff 329. 
Ren, 


4 


Oo 3 And 


= : 

566  Replevin & Avowry. 
| As to the And it is noted, That the Conditionefi 
| Day of De- Re- entry was upon Non- payment of Rent 
mand of Rent. tije Space of a Month after every Quartet, A 

the Demand of Rent was the 28th Day {| 

Chriſtmaſs, and good as reſolved in the Cak 

the Biſhop of Peterborough, vers Catesby, à 
=_ I66, 167. | 
= And the Caſe of Fabian and Rewiſton, 1 Hen 
2 252. where the like Iſſue was taken as ini 
= Caſe of Kirby and Green, but the partic 
1 Iſſue, in the Cafe of Fabian and Rewiſton, wil 
whether the Rent of 7 J. 10 s. due at Lady4 
was demanded by the Space of half an H 


b As fo De- 


1 3 before Sun. ſet; and it was found, that i t 
$ Ms demanded by the Space of a quarter of an Ha Js 
[ Ce. and yet good, becaule it was not m 
L rial; for if there was ſo much Time be 

I Sun-ſet, ſo that in Time it might be paid, 

3 ſufficient, for the Subſtance of the TIſſepoc 
1 x and *tis all one if the _ be wirt 
1 a Abſq; hoc or no: But he refers to Hin 
1 | _u q;hoc, 3 Caſe, where a Difference is ta 
43 where an Iſſue is taken upon an Abi; hoc, Mt 
2 That it was allo found in the Caſe of Fi 

3 and Reꝛviſton, That the Demand was of Rent 
c at the Time of the Demand: And as to thafſ* 
'Y Ie not an- Was held by the Court, That the Verdict ud 
b ſwer'd by the not anſwer the Iſſue; foraſmuch as they Me 


4 Verdi. not found any Demand of Rent made àt et 
1 Feaſt, Cc. But Rent, wiz. half a Year's Mert 
4 | due at the Time of the Demand; for it Met 
dig 
hat 
in 
nd 
oY 


due at the Feaſt next before. 


Conn 
$1" hw 


Replevin & Avowry. 567 


Lgnixance as Bailifs-after ſeveral Deſcents 
by Fine, &c. for Rent Arrear. 


þ = Replevin the Defendants make Cogni- Cogn'. 
Zance as Bailiffs of R. M. after ſeveral De- 
Wents by Fine, Cc. im” FJ. P. & Tho, M. 
% & Sam. M. & Ri. M. defore for Rent 
rear, upon a Leaſe from Ro. M. to Ri. M. 
Whe Plaintiff in his Bar confeſſes the Seiſin in 
ee of S. M. but ſays, That before the making Bar by a Fe- 
Sf the Indendure the ſaid S. made a Feoffment — * 
Þ the Uſe of the ſaid R. A. for his Life, if the Leas, 
id S. ſhould fo long live; and it he died in 
e Life-time of Ro. then to the Uſe of Ri. M. 
Dod his Heirs, during the Life of the ſaid Ro, 
Ind afterwards ſo long as Rob. had Heirs of his 
Body ; whereby Rob. was ſeized, and S. died 
n the Life-time of Rob. and Rich. entred, and 


s ſeized in Fee by Vertue of the ſaid Re- 
tan bainder; and being fo ſeized, made the Leaſe 
„ che Plaintiff as in the Cognizance; but that 


e aſterwards granted the Reverſion to one 
M. in Fee, and that the Plaintiff attorn'd to Traverſe of 


tha de ſaid Grant ; and then traverſes, that the 3 temp 
& ad S. 24. was ſeized in Fee at the Time of > 
ye Fine levied, modo & forma, &c. and Iſſue 


ereon, 2 Lut. 1608, &. And after Verdict 

dr the Plaintiff ic was moved in Arreſt of Judg- 

ent, that the Iſſue was immaterial, and the Obj. That 
tight was not put in Iſſue, and was untried; and the Iſſue was 
dat the Cognizance was not anſwered as to the immaterial. 
ine; and it appear d that Rob. M. was eltopp'd, 

nd againſt his Fine aforeſaid he could not con- 

ey to Tho. M. and that the Right of the Rent 

as in Ro. M. by a Settlement in 650. and there- 

bre tas not material, whether S. M. was ſeized 


Oo 4 At 


70 


eplegder 
warded. 
. "= "> g 


—— for 


Jud gment 
rs Auer 


for Default 


4 


Want of 


of Repleader. Quer nil capiat per breve, for Default of 


Traverſe of 1 the Place in quo, e. contained one Mel 
che Place ill. ſuage in the Pariſh of C. and fo he avows { 


* 


Replevin & Ayowry. 
at the Time of the Fine levied, or not; ſort 
much as Ri. MH. who claimed under him, hain 
convey'd the Fee by his joining with Sam. hf 
Father, in the Settlement, which made the 
Seiſin in Fee to be only Form to induce thlf 
Matter, and therefore tis not traverſable ; and; 
therefore it was inſiſted, That the Verdiaf 
ought to be annulled, and a Repleader award 
ed to the Cognizance; for that ic was wellhut | 
pleaded, 21 H.6. 14. a. per Newton, and tlafxrti 
a Repleader was awarded, as appear'd by thi: 
Rule, tho? no particular Reaſons given by Hor i: 
Court for the ſaid Reſolution. Vide 2 Lu 

1621. & vide eund' 1625. Where, after (elif 
ral Matters and Caſes cited by the Reporteff 
as Reaſons why ſuch a Repleader was gran 
ed, heconcludes, That upon the whole Mate 
the Allegation of a Seiſin, &c. ſeem'd at mol 
to be only Matter of Form to induce il 
Pleading of the Fine, and not ſuch Matter d 
Subſtance which may be preciſely traverſed 1 
is alledged, eſpecially in this Caſe, where then 
are two Conuſors, viz, Sam. and Ri. Mor: 
And it appears by the Plaintiff's own ſhewinf 
in his Bar to the Cognizance, That Ri, A 
at the Time of the Fine levied, had a determ 
nable Fee veſted in him to take Effect after th 
Death of the faid Sam. M. &c, And that a 
laſt, Judgment in the Cate in Queſtion wat 


Kepleader. 


Avowry for Rent Arrear upon a Leaſe, a 


Demurrer thereto. 


Dem, 2 Lat. 1147. Avowry is made, Thi 


Ren 


Replevin & Avowry. 569 

Cent Arrear reſerved upon a Leaſe made ß 

(Minto 7. P. The Plaintiff hereupon demurs 

Tenerally, and the Avowry adjudged ill, be- 

zuſe the Place of taking in the Count was 

It traverſed, Id. 1150. But then an Excepti- p,ception for 

In was taken, that there was Variance be. Yariance, © 

een the Writ and Count, for the Writ is in 

e Derinet, and the Count in the Detinuit; 

ut this Point was not refolv'd, becauſe the 

Parties agreed to amend ; but it is like, if it had pifcrence, 

Deen ſo, that it would be a material Variance; inter Detinet 

Wor in Replevin, in the Detinet, the Plaintiff re- & Derinuit. 
Jorers as well the Value of the Goods as Dama.  ' 

Se; for Reptiſal, F. N. B. 69. L. Co. En, 

bio and 611. but when the Writ and Count 

e 24 Def ea detinuit contra vad & leg, by 

his is implied, That the Plaintiff had his Goods 

gain, and therefore he ſhall only recover Da- 

ages for the taking, and lo refers to Hill, 

14 E. 2. 421. | 


ll. a2 Inn-heeper, lets a Leaſe of the Place 
where, &c. to W. and 4 Drover com- 
ing with Cattle to London, with Con- 
ſent of the Leſſor and Leſſte put in his 
Cattle to feed for one Night, and ]. 
wlll diftrain'd them for Rent Arrear ; the 
Caſe 3s more fully as followeth. 


IN 2 Lut. 1161, Cc. Avowry and Cog- Avewry on 
an nizance, That the Place where, Cc. is Demiſe by 7. 
{called the» Watch-houſe, and that the Defen- to . 

dant F. was poſſeſſed of the Place, and other 

ThiCloſes, for the Term of 8 Years, and demiſed 

Meltem to one . for 7 Years, rendring Rent, 

5 lofland fo avows, Cc. for Rent Arrear, Bar d 

Renfli | 335 temp 


5 _ = FY _ o ” _ 
. EIT IE IR FRA on - 
* 
* 


— 


A 

+44 

4 , 
NY 4 * 
4 
$ , 
[ 
6! 

4 
4 | 

4 

TI 


Obj. That 7. 
ſhews not 
how he be- 
came poſſeſ- 


The Caſe 


Aliter re- 


ported. 


The Queſti- 
on, It the 
Diſtreſs was 
lawſul ? 


Replevin & Avowry: 
temp quo, Cc. his Servants were going to Lu 
don with the ſaid Cattle to make Profit, & 
And that the Defendant F. the Landlord 
knowing that the ſaid Cattle were his prope 
Cattle, and not the Cattle of F. V. his Tenanl W. 
wich the Conſent of the ſaid 7. W. gave Li 
cence to the Plaintiff's Servants to put them i tor 
for a Night per que, & c. Repl, That the Calf ; 0 
tle were there Levant and Couchant, and thy 
they took them for the 232 . Rent Arten wa 
Rejo', That the Defendant J. gave Licene Cc 
ut ſupra, and traverſeth the Levancy and Couf it 1 
chancy «liter. Defendant F. demurs, and t thi 
Plaintiff joins in the Demurrer. Id. 1164. and ſhe 
1165. where tis obſerv'd, That this Cafe is rel La 
ported in the 3d of Levinx 260. and refers till wt 
Co, Litt. 47. 4. 3 Cro. 549 and 628. and then 
makes a Quere, if the 4vowry in this Caſe i 
good, becauſe in it is ſaid, That the Defendant In 
F. was poſleſs'd of the Place i» quo, c. with. 
out ſhewing how he became poſſeſſed ; and 
for this refers to the Cafe of Pell and Garlul 
in his Book. The Cale, as reported in 3 U. 
vinx 260. is ſtated thus, That the Defendant 
Foyce was ſeized of the George- Inn in Barnet, and 
demiſed it, and the Cloſe iz u, to Willis hot 
Years, rendring Rent; That the Plaintiff ws 
a Drover, and bringing the Cattle to London 
ad profic ſuum inde faciend', (for fo is the 
Pleading & nemy ad Mercatum) by the Conſent 
of the Defendant, and Licence of V. the Leſſee, 
put his Cattle into the Cloſe in que, to feed for A 
one Night, and the Defendant, the Landlotd V 
diſtrain d them for Rent Arrear; and if be ſo 
could well and lawfully do the fame was theſ th 
Queſtion ; but no Advantage was taken as it 
being an Inn; but the principal Queſtion was L 
That thoſe Cattle being bringing to _ af 
an 


RKeplevin & Avowry, 57 
and To ſuppoſed to be for the Proviſion of that | 


WM great City, il it ſhould be lawful for the Land. 


ſord to diſtrain them for Rent due for a Cloſe Pro Quer 
in which they are lodg'd for one Night in the not. 
Way; That in Michaemas Term Juſtice Lur- 
webe ſaid, That they were not diſtrainable 
for that Reaſon, and grounded his Opinion on 

Cro. 549, 599. and Chief Juſtice Herbert 
fem'd to incline to his Opinion; but after. 


en wards Pollexfen, Chief Juſtice, and the whole 


Court, gave Judgment for the Avowant for gut after- 
ie was not Reaſon that the Cattle, coming to wards Judg- 
this City from all remote Parts of the Realm, ment tor the 


E ſhould be privileged from Diſtreſs of all Avowant. 


Landlords for their Rent, by all the Way 
which they come. 


In Avowry for Rent, a Copyhold was leaſed 
for 99 Tears, Reverſion to B, N, and L. 
and they three living, the Leaſe of the 
Manor was aſſigned to B. Quere, if the 
Term is not executed in Fee-ſimple, and ſo 


the Inheritance deſtroyed. See the Caſe 
more at large as followeth. 


f. CEE Replevin and Awvorry, 2 Tut. 1165, hold 
8 7 FE wherein, as to the 5 —— 2 

in Law, which was intended to be determin'd 

by the Action, the Caſe in effect is ſuch, wiz. 

A Leaſe for 99 Years is made of a Copyhold 

Meſſuage reſerving Rent, afterwards a Leaſe 

lor 99 Years is made of the Manor, of which Manor lea- 

the Meſſuage is Parcel: TheReverſion of the ſed. 

Fee of the Manor expectant upon the laſt 

Leaſe of 99 Years being in B, N, and L. and 

alterwards they three living, the Leaſe for 


99 


i 
F 
| Z 
i 
4 


$72 


When it ap- 


pears the 
Avowry is for 


more Rent, 


ox that he 
had no Title 
tw arr. 


odic pro 
6 ei A E 


Avowry for 
Rent Arjear 
to J. F. 


Aſſignment. | 
The Queſti- 


no Title to Part of the Rent, there he ſhall not 


Replevin & Avowry. 
99 Years of the Manor is aſſigned to B. and HH 
avows for the Rent; and the 8 wall 
If by the Aſſignment of the Term to 
the Term for Years of the ſaid Manor is mer.] 
ged and executed in the Fee-ſimple ; and by; . 
Conſequence, if the Jointenancy of the InherM" © 
tance is not deſtroyed ? For if it be fo that th 
Jointenancy is deſtroy'd, then it follows, tha; 
the Defendant B. had Title only to Par 
of the Rent, and he had avow'd for the whole 
Rent, and ſo his Awvowry was ill in the whole 
That when it appears upon the whole Record 
that the Avowry is for more Rent then is be 
come due, there he ſhall have a Retorn for 6M. 
much as is due: But if it appears that he hat 


have a Retorn for any Part; and fo is May 
28x. and other Books; but this Point was not 
reſolv'd by Reaſon of the ill Pleading in the 
— and it was agreed that the Point wa J 
not reſolved in any Book, Idea quære, ſays he, 

of that Point, and refers to Co. Litt. 182. 6, 
Litt, Seq, 392. Co. Lit. 185. a, That aſtet 
three ſeveral Arguments Judgment was given 
in the principal Caſe for the Plaintiff, by Rea-M 
fon of the ill Pleading in the Awvowry ; but the 
Court did not give any particular Reaſons of 
their Reſolutions, Vide eund 1174. Hill veri 
Bolton. £7 | 1 

The Defendant makes Avoury, for that 
J. F. being ſeized in Fee of the Place in quo, 
Ce. by Leaſe and Releaſe convey'd the ſame to 
the Uſe of 4. Wife of Sir H. V. for Life; 
That the ſaid A. after the Death of the ſaid 
H. V. demiſed the fame to the Plaintiff, ren- 
dring Rent, and fo avowed for Rent Arrear: 
The Plaintiff pleads in Bar, That P. Lord V. 
was ſeized in Fee, Cc. That 6 Avg. 41 _ 


Replevin & Ayowry: 575 
e deviſed to P. B. his ſecond Son in Tail. Bar by an 
ale, to hold after the Death of S. Counteſs of *1der Title, 
Remainder to the right Heirs of P. Lord /. 1 —ç 
When ſets forch the Death of the ſaid Lord and diſſeized by 
'Wounteſs, the Entry of P. B. and his Death, 5. F. who 
xd a Diſcent to R. his Son and Heir; and that made ce _ 
N was ſeized until he was diſſeized by the ſaid Conveyance. 
F. who being ſeized by Diſſeiſin, made the 
caſe and Releaſe ut ſupra. Rep, That be- Rep! by a Fe- 
dre the ſaid J. F. any thing had, Cc. the ſaid, offment 2 
Ir H. V. was ſeized in Fee, Gc. and enfeof. iP. 
d the ſaid J. F. and one AM. in Fee, and avers of poſſeflion 
Wontinuance of the Poſſeſſion and Seiſin for and Seiſin. 
P Years, and more, under the ſaid Title, by 
hich the Entry of the ſaid P. was bar'd, and 
Baverſes the Diſſeiſin of P. by F. F. Vide + 
Lut. 1199, Oc. 
* Vide ante ſur Title. 


13. Bar pur Rent ou Services, Gc. 


5 Efendant makes Cognizance as Bailiff 
b of T. M. and that G. Lord C. ſeit“ 
er de, Cc. Unde locus eſt parcel, Et ill tenuit 
ad T. M. ut de Manerio ſuo, & c. per fideli- 
Ee reddit 3 l. 8 s. 8 d. Oc. That the Pre. 
ies deſcended to 7. Lord C. as his Son and 
eit, and makes Cognizance for 3 J. 3 s. 34. 
Rent Arrear, and for other 31.8 5. 8 d. 
"  relevio poſt mortem G. Dom. C. Bar, as to 
bat e Rent by Tender and Refuſal ; and as to the 
/"" Wief Plaintiff demurs ſpecially, Od von appa- 
d predict T. M. habuit titulum ad bend rele- 
m predict. The Defendant joins in the De- 
Irer, vide 3 Levinx. 141 & 145. where, 
Won the Argument, it's ſaid, That it was re- 
ed by the whole Court that he need not, 
dhe Relief is not Parcel of the Tenure, but 

a 


LY 


| Tpecial Reſervation, as Co. 2. Inf. 232. But a 


Cogn for Rent 
Atrear, and 

Suit of Court, 
and Plaintiff 


' traverſes the 


Teaure, 


Special Ver- 
dict. 


Q. If che 
Manor was 


deſtroy ed. 


Replevin & Avowry- 


a Flower incident to every Tenure in Soccage; ul 
and tho it may be releaſed, as twas objected, 2 
or upon the Tenure a ſpecial Reſervation 
without Relief, it ſhall be intended until it bil 


ſhewn on the other Part, becauſe *tis incidem ee 
de communi jure, altho ſeparable by Releaſe in 


ea que frequentius accidunt jura vr rg and er 
Judgment was given for the Conuſant. | 
The Defendant makes Cognizance as Bai 
liff to V. M. That T. H. was ſeized in Fee of; 
Meſſuage held of the ſaid 24. V. of his Mandt 
of M. by Fealty 4 s. Rent and Suit of Coun; 
and for the Rent Arrear, and Suit of Court na 
made, bene cogn, &. The Plaintiff by his Ba 
proteſting, that V. M. was not ſeized of the 
Services, confeſſes a Tenure by the Rent d 
4 +. tantum; and taverſes the Tenure by Fealij 
Rent and Suit of Court, RepP & Iſſue ſur 
Traverſe. Vide 2 Lut. 1211, Cc. 

Idem 1215. That the Jury found a ſpecid 
Verdit, which agreed with the Cognizancei 
all Circumſtances but one, viz, That the Vet 
dict found the Court to be held before the Sten 
ard, and the Conuſance does not mention be 
fore whom it was held ; but that was no matt 
rial Difference, for the Jury found the Matt 
of Fact as it is; and indeed all Courts Bard 
are held before the Steward, albeit the Suito 
are Judges. Idem 1216. That then the Queſ 15 
on is, Whether the ſubſequent Matter foun 
by the Verdict, viz. That for 20 Years la 
paſt there had been only one Freehold-Tenan 

(admitting that it deſtroy'd the Manor) ſh: 
be regarded, inaſmuch as it is repugnant to thi 
Matter found before, and to the Agreement 
the Parties themſelves in Pleading? And as 
that, he ſays, the Court took no Notice, be 

I Cal 


s 


— 


Replevin & Avowry. 575 
ſe the Jury is ſworn only to try the Matter The Jury not 
'}. Controverſy between the Parties; and if the to diſpute 
y ſhall be permitted to make Queſtions and e 
iſpuces in Things whereupon the Parties cn "Or 
lere agreed before, it would be of ill Conſe- 
ence; and refers to ſeveral Authorities to 
at Purpoſe : And afterwards Judgment was 
ren for the Defendants by the unanimous Opi- Toile pro._| 
Jon of the whole Court; and Chief Juſtice Pef or 
ty ſaid, it might be a Court Baron, altho 
e Jury had found that it was held before the 
eward. 
Ii chere appearz, that afterwards a Writ of Error and 
ror was brought in Banco Regis, and Judg- Judgment af. 
ne was affirmed by the Opinion of the firmed. 
ole Court; and it was ſaid that a Court 
con might be well holden before a Steward, 
1 Leon, 316. and 2 fo, 22, 23. Vide 1 Mod. 
9.173. 1. Cro. 497. E 
Vide 13. E. 4. 18. That a Court Baron is Of a court 
ec dent of Common Right to every Manor, Baron. 
eil; Ce. 791. That there is no Manor with- 
a Court Baron. | 
hat there cannot be a Court where there 
Wily one Suitor, Co. 4. 26. Melwich's Caſe ; 
1 And. 256 K 257. It'sfaid a Manor is not 
Wiroy'd, altho' there be but one Tenant. 
vide 1 Leon 218. That if one in Plead- 
ico entitle himſelf to a Court belonging to his 
dello, it ſhall be intended a Court Baron 
Duns in Fitz, N. B. 76. D. it is called Curia Mane- 
« hand if the Pleading intend any other Court 
nan 2 Court Baron, then a Title ought to be 
<&* to it; but otherwiſe of a Court Baron, 
192. 
" we, It was obj:&ted, That no Seiſin of the ggiſin. 
as Mor was alledg'd in W. M. but the Repor- 
| bcſerres many Precedents to be accor- 


Cal ding 


— — ——y ——— — 


= Replevin & Avowry. 


ditig to the Cognizance, and refers to them; | 


| . 2 Lut. 1217. | 
cg for Ser- Replevin upon a Writ of ſecond Delive. 
vice undone, rance, Defendant makes Conuſance as Bailiff 
viz, Homage. of F. B. Kt. and fays, that the Plaintiff long 
before the Time, c. was ſeized of the Manor 
of Curles, of which the Place where, Cc. .was 
Parcel in Fee, and held it of the ſaid F. B. as 
of his Manor of C. by Knights Service, viz, 
by Homage, ec. of which Services he waz 
ſeized by the Hands of the Plaintiff, Cc. and 
Demur' cum diſtrain'd for Homage. Plaintiff demurs, E- 


cauſis. pro Caufis qd” Def non fecit ſing aliquod titlum ad 


bend homagium prefat quer, Acetiam qd Copnity 
predict eft repugnans in ſe ac in recognitione ill 
non allegatur ſufficiend* ſeina de Serviciis, prout 
. debet allegari, Et monſtratio ſeiſma non eſt forma. 
Judgment pro lis, Defendant joins in Demurrer, Winch. 
Quer'. Ent, 973. als 859. And there it's ſaid, Judg. 
ment for the Plaintiff, pur ceo que le Def ne fait 
title a luy pur le Homage, & c. But ſee Winch. Rep 
fol. 31. where it ſeems Judgment was for the 
Avowant, and ſo Hatton 50. ſame Caſe. E- 

wide 2 Lut. 1217. 


That the Defendant held by Fealty, Ren, 
and Suit of Court, &c. 


Avowry for In Replevin Defendant makes Cognizance 
Rent Arrear, as Bailiff of G. B. by Diſtreſs for Rent Arreat 


from F. C. Tenant by Fealty ; the Plaintiff 


ſays diu ante, &c. the ſaid J. C. being ſeized of 
40 Acres, unde, & c. in feodo, demiſed them fot 
five Years, * Qd'q; fine J. C. non poteſt Cog: 
* nitionem predict' in judicium deducere & 
et auxilium de eod' J. C. Et ei conceditur, 
deo ſumm', &. Et comperuit & jungit ſe 

1 * cum 


c 
« 


| 
+ 
( 
8 
| 
: 
1 
l 


8 


Replevin & Avowry. N 


cum prefat quer in placito predict', Et dic? Plaintiff 


gꝗd' dict' J. C. diu, &c. fuir ſeit' de 70 acr pgs "ny a 
„ © terre unde, 8c. in feodo pro reddit” 9 8. & fre berſes the 


ol © fervic? de prefar? G. B. Et traverſe le Tenure Tenureé. 
modo & forma prout Def* per Cogn' ſupe- 


K  rivs ſuppon'. . Det* moratur in Lege pro eo 

all 9 predict J. C. & S. non dedic ſeinam 

«| ; lervic' predict per que tenta predict” cum 9 
Y pertin in forma predict teneri fuperius alle- Def" demnr* . 
x g2cur ſed tantum modo dedic & traverſant cum Cauſis. 


* tenur” eorundem ten'torum cum pertin* quod 
"in hoc Cafu per Legem Terre dedicere vel 
© tfaverſare non Debuer' nec poſſunt, Aceci- 
am Travers' & placitum duplic' in ſe conti- 
gent materiam & eſt negativa pregnans, Et 
© hoc, &c. Unde, &c, Et Def jung' in mo- 
frac, Vide Winch Ent. 977. als. 863, Cc. 
Et VVinch Rep. fol: 18. | 


See more. on this Head in Winch, Ent. Tit” 
Replevin, Raſt. Ent. Co, Entries, Cc. 1 Mod, 
Inr. Tit Refalo. Thomp. En. 271, 274, 267, &c. 
and Placit. Gen. 573. See alſo Townſend's Ta- 
bles, and Carnwal's Tables, Tit Replevin. 


Obſervations concerning Diſtreſſes for Rent 
from Statute Law. 


dee Y 17 Car. 2. c. 7, When a Plaintiff ſhall hen 4 

be nonſuited before Iſſue in any Suit of Plaintiff is 
if Replevin, removed, or depending in any of the dere | 
ga Courts at V Veſt mirſter, the Defendant making before Hue. 
cl Puggeſtion in the Nature of an Avowry for 

Rent; the Court upon his Prayer ſhall award 

& © Wric to the Sheriff ro enquire of the Sum in Arrears to bo 
Arrear, and the Value of the Diſtreſs ; where. inquired of. 
- ſel pon Notice of x5 Days ſhall be given to the 

vm Pp Plaintiff, 


2 
, 
1 6 Pres gy ; 
ot; 8 E — 2 — "op — 
N 3 1. 1 1 FS TEL * * 2 N * e 
— © of \ — oo _ * < 8 4 2 
gy — * — — e == # > — 3 dy T LIP 5 —_ 82 
res e «. L - Wy os (+; 0s. — — - — 
3 rene * 2 eee S 1 , 3 


r 7 SSSR. 


Pics an 
ce 


"ry 


- Plaintiff, or his Attorney in Court, of the fie: £ 
| ting of ſuch Inquiry; upon Return of which v 
Recovery Inquiſition the Defendant ſhall recover the Ar- 7 
with Coſts. rears, if the Diſtreſs amount to that Value, alſo : 
| | the Value of the Diſtreſs with Colts ; and ſhall Ml z 
2 Execution thereupon by Fieri Facias, of Ml { 
it. „ ; Lt 
If nonſuited it ſuch Plaintiff be nonſuit alter the Avowr WM f 
after Avowry and Iſſue joined ; or if the Verdict be againit t 
and Iſſue. him, the Jury at the Defendant's Prayer ſhall MW: « 
enquire ut ſupra, and the Avowants recovet Ml ( 
ut ſupra. 04 8 

If Judgment If Judgment be upon Demurrer for ſuch 
be for him Avowant, the Court at the Detendant's Prayet MW |; 
upon Demut- ſhall award a Writ to enquire the Value of the 
5 Diſtreſs, whereupon he ſhall have Judgment Wl | 
ut ſupra. 5 | 
If Diftreſs here the Diſtreſs ſhall not be found to be 
amounts not to the Value of the Arrears, the Party may WW \ 
to the Value. diſtrain for the Reſidue. a 
How the And by 19 Car. 2, cap. 5. The ſaid Act 
aforeſaid Act ſhall be of Force in all Cauſes of Replevin.in the t 
mall extend. Court of Common Pleas for the County Palatite ! 
of Lancaſter, the Court of the great Seffions of I « 
ales, the Court of the great Seſſions for the: 
County Palatinate of Cheſter, and the Court of | 
Common Pleas for the County Palatine of Dur-. 
bam. . ( 
So by 2 VV. & M. Seſs. x. Cap. J. Where 
any Goods or. Chattels ſhall be dillraineg for W « 
Rent, reſerved and due upon any Demiſe, « 
Leaſe or Contract; and the Tenant, or 
Owner of the Goods, ſhall not within five Days i « 


after ſuch Diſtreſs, and Notice thereof (with 
the Cauſe of ſuch taking) left at the Manſion 
Houle, or other moſt notorious Place of the 
Premiſſes charged with the Rent, replevy the , 
fame, the Perſon diſtraining may with the 
Sheriff, 


Replevin & Ayowry: 875 


Sheriff, or Under-Sheriff of the County, oe 

with the Conſtable of the Hundred,” Pariſh or Appraiſe- 

Place where, Cc. who are thereby required ment, Of. 

to aſſiſt, cauſe the Diſtreſs to be appraiſed by 

wo fworn Appraiſers whom ſuch Sheriff, &c. 

ſhall ſwear to appraile them truly. actording to 

the beſt of their Underſtanding ; and after 

ſuch Appraiſement may ſell the lame towards 

the Satis faction of thę Rent, and the Charges 

of the Diſtreſs and Appraiſement, leaving the 

Overplus, if any be, in the Hands of the laid 

Sheriff, Cc, ſor the Owner's Uſe. 1 
Alſo it ſhall be lawful, to diſtrain ſor Rent Sheafs or 

Arrear, as aforeſaid, any Sheafs, or Cocks of Cocks of 

Corn, or Corn. looſe, or in the Straw, or Corn, Oc. 

Hay in any Barn or Granary, or upon any 

Hovel, Stack or Rick, or atherwile; and to 

lock up, and 'detain the ſame in the Place 

where it ſhall be found, -ill'# be replevied, 

as aſoreſaid; and upon. the Default rhereot, 

within the Time aforeſaid, to fell the ſame at- 

ter Appraiſement, as aforeſaid; fo nevei the- 

leſs: that it be not removed to the Damage of 

the Owner, but kept where it fhall be found 

r ſeized, as impounded till it be teplevied or 

_— FRE 6 oF $6 tne 5 

Tbat upon any Pound Breach, or Refcous Upon 2 

of Goods diſtrained for Rent, the Perſon Pound 

grieved ſhall have a ſpecial Action upon the Beach. 

Caſe, and recover treble Damages and Coſts 

of Suit againſt the Offenders, ot againſt the 

Owners of the Goods, if they come to his Uſe 

or Poſſeſſion. + 990 


If any ſuch Diſtreſs and Sale, as aforeſaid, Didreß with 


{hall be made where there is no Rent due, the out Cauſc. 
Owner of the Goods diſtrained may by Action 
of Treſpaſs, or upon the Caſa againſt the Per- 

P p 2 ſon's 


J 


580 


Replevin & Avowry. 


ſon's diſtraining; recover double the Value of 


the Goods diſtrained, with full Colts of Suit. 


Pleading. 


— 


Allo by 4 & 5 Ann. cap. 16. Any De- 
fendant or Tenant, or Plaintiff, in any Re. 
ple vin, in any Court of Record, with Leave 


may plead as many ſeveral Matters as are 


: neceſlary. 


Coſts upon 
Demurrer. 


Proviſo, That if any ſuch Matter or De. 
murrer be judged inſufficient, Coſts ſhall be 
— at the Diſcretion of the Court; or if a 
Verdict be found on any ſuch Iſſue ſor the 


Plaintiff or Demandant, Coſts ſhall be given 


in like manner, unleſs the Judge certify, That 


the Defendant, Tenant or Plaintiff in Replevin, 
had a probable Cauſe to plead it. 


Rent to be 
paid before 
Goods ſhall 
be taken in 
Execution. 


By an Ad made Anno 8 Annæ Reginæ, 
For the better Security of Rents, and to 
prevent. Frauds committed by Tenants. 


I is enacted, That from and after the firſt 
1 Day of May 1710. no Goods or Chattels 
whatſoever, lying or being in or upon any 
Meſſuage, Lands or Tenements, which are or 
ſhall be leaſed for Life or Lives, Term of Years; 
at Will, or otherwiſe, ſhall be liable to be 
taken by Vertue of any Execution on any Pre- 
tence whatſoever, unleſs the Party, at whoſe 
Suit the ſaid Execution is ſued out, ſhall before 
the Removal of ſuch Goods from off the ſaid 
Premiſles, by Vertue of fuch Execution ot 
Extent, pay to the Landlord of the ſaid Pre- 
miſſes, or his Bailiff, - all ſuch Sum or Sums of 
Money as are or fhall be due for Rent for the 
faid Premiſſes at the Time of the taking ſuch 
Goods or Chatiels by Vertue of ſuch Execu- 
fron; | 


Provided 


— Je e nn re e 


— 4 | \ 2 7 
- | "$5 he : SY 9 
Replevin & Avowry. 581 1 
f Provided the ſaid Arrears of Rent do not Not to ex- = 
amount to more than one Year's Rent ; and in _ Re s = 
. Bl caſe the ſaid Arrears ſhall exceed one Year's OE | 
Rent, then the ſaid Party, at whoſe Suit ſuch | 
Execution is ſued out, paying the ſaid Land- * 
lord, or his Bailiff, one Year's Rent, may 'F 
proceed to execute his Judgment, as be might 0 | 
have done before the making of this Act; | 
and the Sheriff, or other Officer, is hereby 3H 
impowered and required to levy and pay to | 2 
the Plaintiff, . as well the Money fo paid for 2 
Rent, as the Execution Money. ä * 
And that in caſe any Leſſee for Life or Diſtreſ upon ja 
Lives, Term of Years, at Will, or otherwiſe, à Fravdutene 10 
of any Meſſuages, Lands or Tenements, up- 2 of $8] 
on the Demife whereof any Rents are or ſhall — = 
be reſerved or made payable, ſhall, from and | 1 
aſter the ſaid firſt Day of May, fraudulently or "oh 
clandeſtinely convey or carry off or from ſuch bu 
demiſed Premiſſes his Goods or Chattels, with 4 
Intent to prevent the Landlord or Leſſor from 
i deſtraining the ſame for Arrears of ſuch Rent 4 
ls WI fo reſerved as aforeſaid ; it ſhall and may be ig 
y Wl lawful to and for ſuch Leſſor or Landlord, or I 
" any Perſon or Perſons by him for that Purpoſe | 2F 
„ MW lawfully impowered, within the ſpace of 3 Days 2M 
next enſuing ſuch conveying away, or carry- 1 
e- ing off ſuch Goods or Chattels as aforeſaid, to 5 
ſe take and ſeize ſuch Goods and Chattels where. 
re erer the ſame ſhall be found, as a Diftreſs for 
id the ſajd Arrears of ſuch Rent, and the ſame to 
ot ll fell, or otherwiſe diſpoſe of, in ſuch Manner 
e. as if the ſaid Goods and Chattels had actually 
of © been diſtrained by ſuch Leſſor or Landlord, in 
he £ and upon ſuch demiſed Premiſſes, for ſuch Ar- 
ch rears of Rent; any Law, Cuſtom or Uſage, to 
u: the contrary in any wiſe notwithſtanding. 
Provided nevertheleſs, That nothing in this Exception of 
ed Act contain'd ſhall extend, ar be conſtrued to Sale lens fide, 
; Pp3 extend, 


T 


82  _.  Replevin & Avowry. 
extend, td iwpower ſuch Letfor or Landlord 
to take of ſeize any Goods or Chattels as a U. 
ſtreſs for Arrears of Rent, which ſhall be fold 
bena fide, and for a valuable Conſideration, be. 
fore ſuich Seiaute made. 1 
Actions a= And that whereas no Action of Deht lay 
gainſt Te- againſt a Tenant for Life br Lives, for any 
Mo — Arrears of Rent, during the Continuance of 
e fen Effate; *tis enacted, That it ſhall and may 
be lawful for any Perſon or Perſons having 
Rent id Arrear, or due upon any Leaſe or De: 
mile for Life or Lives, to bring an Action of 
Debt for ſueh Arrears of Rent, in the fam 
manner as they might have done in cafe fuck 
Rent were due, and reſerved upon a' Leak: 
b * 
Diftreſſes, * And that all Diſtreſſes to be made, as afore. 
ow liable te Ciich, mall de liable to ſuch Sales, and in ſuch 
9 Manner, and the Moneys ariſing by ſuch 
Sales to be diſtributed in like Manner, as by ah 
Act made in the 2d Year of the Reign of their 
late Majeſties King VYilliam and Queen Man, 
intituled, [An Act for enabling the Sale of Good: 
Aiſtrained for Rent, in caſe the Rent be not paid 
in reaſonable Time, is in that Behalf directel 
and appointed. 41270 ä 8 | 
Remedy a- And that whereas Tenants pur auter Vt, 
__ (that is, for Life of another Perſom) and Eeſfess 
3 for Years, or at Will, frequently hold; over the 
Ne. Tenements to them demiled after the Determi: 
nation of ſuch Leaſes; And whereas after the 
Determination of ſuch, or any other L caſes, 
no Diſtreſs can by Law be made for any At- 
rears of Rent that grew due on ſuch reſpective 
Leaſes before the Determination thereof; 'tis 
enacted, That it ſhall and may be lawful for 
any Perion or Perſons having any Rent in 
Arrear, or due upon any Leaſe for Life or 
| 1125 FER | * Lives, 


R — — A -. 


Replevin & Ayowry. 

Lives, or for Years, or at Will, ended or de- 
termined, to diſtrain for ſuch Arrears, aſter the 
Determination of the ſaid reſpective Leaſes, 
in the ſame manner as they might have done, 
if ſuch Leaſe or Leaſes had not been ended or 
determined. 


583 


Provided, That ſuch Diſtreſs be made within At what 
the ſpace of ſix Calendar Months after the De- Time, 


termination of ſuch Leaſe ; and during the 
Continuance of ſuch Landlord's Title or Inte- 
telt, and during the Poſſeflion of the Tenant 
from whom ſuch Arrears became due. | 


But that nothing in this Act contain'd ſhall Saving to 
extend, or be conſtrued to extend, to let, hin- Her Majeſty, 


der or prejudic2 Her Majeſty, Her Heirs ot ©* 
Succeſlors, in the levying, recovering or ſei- 

ang any Debts, Fines, Penalties or Forfeitures, 

that are or ſhall be due, payable or anſwerable 
to Her Majeſty, Her Heirs or Succeſſors; but 
that it ſhall and may be lawful for Her Maje- 
ſty, Her Heirs and Succeſſors, to levy, reco- 
yer and ſeize ſuch Debts, Fines, Penalties and 
Forfeitures, in the ſame manner as it this Act 
had never been made. F 


14. Avowry, &c. pur Amercement, &c. 


J. T pred J. & R. per W. L. Att ſuum Avowry for 
* 


ven”. & defend? vim & injur* quando, K 


© &c. Et bene àdvocant captionem Eque pre- ef of the 


dictꝰ in predict loco in quo, &c. Et juſte, &c. Poor. 


© Quia dic qd' predict' tee quo, &. iidem 
J. & R. exiſten' ſuperviſor” pauperum pa- 
© roch* dg W. in Com N. predict virtute cu- 
juſdam Warrant' ſub manibus & ſigill' preno- 
© bil C. Domini Vicecom' H. & R. M. Ar 
adtunc duorum Juſtic' Domini Regis nunc 
ad pacem in Com' N. predi&'. conlervarid' 

P p 4 © align” 


8 = 
TY 4 Sag . r rr T 2; 
= — 2 4 _ - Fo. Pb fs 2 
— P 3 — 
3 Chr wa os dl # ” 
N — * 7 2 Wn ah — 8 8 = 
e E ͤ ˙¹i . ˙ ů1M B . . Ä! 


2 [ 
. PO 
—_ — TY 


89%  Replevin & Ayowry: 


obi. 


_ © & ibm' recuſavit ſolvere eiſdem T. & R. pre. 


aſſign (Un' eorum de le Quorum exiſtin) 
© geren' dat' 8 die Apr? Anno Domini 1697, 
Guardian Eccleſie & Syperviſor pauperum 
ejuſdem paroch de W. predict direct apud 
* predi&' locum in quo, &c. exiſten' in pq 
* roch' de W. predict” in Com predict” roga- 
© bant & demandabant de prefat J. G. ad ſol 
© vend' eis ſum' triu' ſolid? & quatuor denar' 
© leglis' monete Angl' ſuper eum debo' modo 
impoſit' pro predict” loco in quo, &c. vocat 
* S. H. in paroch' de W. predict in Com 
predictꝰ exiſten' erga relevam' pauperum pa- 
* roch' de W. predi& authoritat' & ſecundum 
© tenor” purport? & effect” cujuſdem Statut in Me 
* Parl' Domine Eliz' nuper Regine Angl — 

Weſtm' in Com' Midd' Anno Regni ſui 43 
* tent' fat? & provis', Et quia idem J. adtunc Hand 


f dit 3 8. 4 d. idem T. & R. ut Superviſor 
* pauperum predict' vigore Statut & Warrant Whor 
predict bene advocant caption” eque predict WRe 
* predicto tee quo, &c. in predict” loco in 
* quo, &c. no'iediſtriction' pro predic” 35. 4 d. Ca 
ſuper ipſum J. G. in predictꝰ loco in quo, &c. Whee 
voc S. H. in paroch' de W. predict in Com 
predict' fic ut prefertur impoſit' erga releva- 
men pauperum paroch' predict' de W. pre- Nr 
dict tunc exiſten aretro & inſolut? & juſte, Naie 
© &c. Et hoc parat ſunt verificare, Unde pet 
* judicium & retorn' eque predict' eis adjudi: 
cari, &c. Quer' moratur in Lege, Et Del 
jung' in morac'. 


One Exception only was takgn to this 
Amwowry, viz, if they had not waved the Statute, 
and it ſeems not, viz. | 

That it is not ſaid in the Avowry, that the 
Plaintiff was an Inhabitant within the Pariſh, 

ee or 


Replevin & Avowry. 533 
or that he occupied any Lands within it; and 
the Avowry only ſays that the Sum of Money 
aſſeſſed on the Plaintiff, fuir debo modo impoſit, 
which is too general without ſhewing how; 
and they having waved the Benefit of Pleading 
according to the Statute, ought to have ſhewn 
theſe Things preciſely, and cited Stiles 12 & 13. 
/Vbitley and Fauſet. Vide 2 Lut. 1179. 
But it was anſwered by the Court, That the R. 

Defendants in this Cafe had not waved the Be- 7 
nefit of the Statute of 43 Elix. cap. 3. Par. 9, 
or they have concluded their Awvowry, that 
bey took the Diſtreſs, Virtute cujuſdam Add ns in 
hoe Caſu nuper edit & provis, 

Then another Exception was taken, vis, Another Ex- 
3 Wor that the Writ was Quare caperunt Averia, ceptionas to 
© Wand the Count was for taking one Mare only, 2 Variance 
and cited 7 E. 4. 31. Pl. 18, 3 Cro. 185. Ed. — 
wards and VVatkins ; and Judgment was given Gr 
t Wor the Defendant, and for this laſt Exception 5udic' 'pro 
t' WReference is made to ſeveral Books: And it is Def. 
in Wurther noted, that Juſtice Powell ſaid in this 
d. WCaſe, which then was not denied, that it had 
C. been ill after Verdict. But in another Caſe 
mn Waker, between Prieſtiy and Langley, it was ſaid 
a. Wby Chief Juſtice Treby, That Variance be- 
e- Ntween the Writ and Count after Verdict was O. If aided 


te, Fzided by the Oxford Act. Vide 2 Lut. 1180, after Verdict 
et 1181. 


Avowry upon 2 Diſtre ſs for an Amercement 
. for not repairing @ Bridge. 


Ide Lev. Ent. 154, &. Defendants Cuſtom ofthe 
ſay, that the Dean and Chapter of Manor to re- 

VV:tminſter were ſeized of the Manor of D. in pair. 

Fee in jure Eceleſe, in which Manor is a Cu- 

3 „ £3 ſtom, 


8 „ . * © A RC 2 - — 1 — 7 
T „ „ — 9 pe = 


" 
8 
. 1 
— h * a, - F V TR. IJ * . l N 
F * — a p. er 1 REY =, — r — y 1 
* 1 —— 2 pay 4 » * — * wtf _ LS , ha, 3 7 * % 
= —_ RE" * : i i ti * * * 0 0 n nr eee >: HS e 7 bs | ＋ 1 ri bl 
. x * | Cr > Ran = i p . KL 5 0 3 P K 8 
on « of v# 4 * 14 . — — Fe 
* 5 n 2 8 * \ by 6 ; * ** . a) x 4 p A s JA b : , — $a - — 
* - £ ” 4 * — 1 1 — — — wine a. 35 8 * ” * 0 . p 1 "_ 
2 ve ate . OE Ee « * —— — ee, 8 " * 8 r 2 ä : 
p — | — — 2 6 2 4 5 vt 244% + y Fog 1 * s 9 40 — — =, rr * 1 i \ 
l a * . ro . SS «LY ICS „„ IRS ee CT RRIRs 4 * 4 MO "hw —4 nd 8 a Cw * FU we 


Cuſtom to 
make By- 0 


: + 515 


Replevin & Avowry. 
ſtom, That all the Tenants of Lands in B. 
(having Common of Paſture to their Tene. 1 


ments belonging) have uſed to repair a Bridge 
in E. alſo another Cuſtom for the Steward, 


with the Aſſent of the Homage to make By. I , 

Laws, and impoſe Penalties, and the Land to 

Laws, and diſtrain, &c. Then the Defendant derives 2 R 
Penal- Title from the Dean and Chapter; alſo a Pre. fu 


impoſe P 
ti 


ſentment of the Bridge being out of Repair, 7 
with an Ordinance that the Inhabitants ſhould WO py 
repair on Forfeiture of 5 J. That the Plaintifh MW... 
were Commoners and Inhabitants, and had 
Notice, That it was afterwards preſented that 
the Bridge was not repaired, and thereby z 
Forfeiture of 5/. to the Lord, and fo make 
Cognizance, and juſtifie the Diſtreſs. Bar, Dt 
injur ſua propr. Deſendants demur, wide L. 
vinx Ent. 154, Cc. vide 3 Lev. Rep. 48. Where, 
upon the Argument, it was held, That a Pre: 
ſcription for a Steward, with the Conſent of 
the Homage to make By-Laws, is ill, The 
Replication, De inj uria ſua propr abſq; tali cauſa, 
was held good by all the Juſtices, except Ls 
vinx, Without making any particular Traverſe 
but by him twas held ill and multifarious ; for 
the Conuſance contain'd the Title of the Mx 
nor, the Cuſtom, the By-Law, and the no 
making the Bridge ; but by all the Conuſance 
was held ill. 1. For the Steward to make By: 
Laws, and the Homage only to conſent, 
2. For impoſing a Penalty upon a Townſhip 
and leveying it upon one particular Man 
who had no Remedy by Contribution; where 


KR * 


— — * — 
8 rr 


— 


S 


fore Judgment was given for the Plaintiff. | - 
is there alſo faid, That Commiſſioners off , 
Sewers cannot impoſe Penalties for Townſhip co 
but for Headſhips, Id. 49. Simile Rep placitly val 


General. 503, pur Amercement in Leet 
I no 


- * 


Replevin & Avowry. 587 
not repairing a Bridge, and traverſes the U- 
- I ſage to repair, and Iſſue thereon. * 
Vile poſtea pur Pain. 
See Avowry for an Amercement of a Reſi- Traverſe de 
ent for not appearing at the Leet, 1 Browns Reſidency .\- 
0. $06. Bar proteſt, & c. pro placito qd fuit infra Lean, 
2 Reſidens infra aliud Manerium, & travers 9d N 
* fur reſident infra Domin m & Manerium de 8. 
, 307. Vide Moile Preſ. 89. Raft, Ent. 553. 

Placir. Gen. 5 49. NP | 


SY 


Pro Amerciamento in Cur* Baron* pro Court Baron 
ſuceiden & aſportatione Jampnorum vocat? | 
© Golle in N. parcell' Manerii 1 Browne 
i : 0 7 W 

308. n 

| © Pro Amerciamento in Cur' Baron' pro Traverſe de 
© fuperoneratione Coieꝰ, Bar per Preſcription? Reſidency. * 
de Common, Et travers' qd? tee Amercia. f 
| ment” fuic reſidens infra Manerium. 1 Brounl. 

c . 
£9 o 7 | a 

E Pro Amerciament' pro ſecta ad Molen- 

dina infact'. Hern 665, 673. 


15. Avorpry pur Fine & Bar inde. 


. gry" N 
Fir not paying a Fine upon Admiſſion of a Cuſtoma- 
5 - 1} Tenant. © 
| EF' advocat' pro dampn' faQ” in Avowry, Bat 
. libo' tento ill” & Comit' E. Bar, & Rep. 


qd' terra eſt Cuſtomar', & placitat' admiſſio- 

nem ſuam per le Def & le Comit', Repl*q? 

terra eſt annui valoris 28 I. Et finis pro 

admiſſione aſſeſs ad 35 l. & pro non Glu 

con', Entry aud Forfeiture 5 Quer' rejung pro 

valore unius anni tantum per Cuſtom', Def? Demur' cum 
demur', Eo ꝗd' valor” terre reſtat in eſtima- Gaul, 
= f rione, 


1 88 
3 = 


The ſole 
Queſtion: 


F ? 1 _ 
_. 
_— » 
ts 4 


Ul 
. 


 Replevin'& Avowry: 
* tione, Et qa conſuetudo eſt incerta in ſuf. 
© ciens & in lege vacua, Et pet' judic'de Re. 
* cord? unacum dampnis juxta ſormam Statut, 
© &c. Vide 3 Lev. 249, 254. 


Idem 255. It is there obſerved, that the folefW: 
Queſtion argued at Bar was, If a Cuſtom 10 
pay a Fine certain to the Value of the Land 
for a Year at the Time of the Grant be good; pt 
for it was objected, That the annual Value uu de 
uncertain, at one Time more, at another leſs; lit 
and one Perſon will give more Rent at one R 
Time than at another, ſo the Matter altoge- '* 
ther uncertain z but by the Court it was hel © 
certain enough, and iſſuable, and triable, pi /- 
Patriam, if it be of ſuch a yearly Value offff Fr 


— pro Dot, and therefore the Cuſtom good, and 0 


uer”. 


livus. 


Demur. 


Judgment was given for the Plaintiff. 90 


Avowry for not paying two Fines upon tm ſa 
ſeveral Alienations, Secundum Con 


Manerii. Of 
Spe Ba 


Cogn? ut bal: : T HAT J Va. ſeixed of a Meſſuage au Le 


Lands, Que tenuit de Decano Ml f. 
© Capitlo' Eccleſie C. ut de Manerio de M 
6 per tal ſervic' & reddit', Et per cons? ind 
7 aſk quamlibet Alienation' in feodo, vel pr 
© vita alicujus parcel! terre tent* de Maneric 
© habuer” reddir' unius anni & medietat' uniu 
© anni per quem tal terr' tent? fuer de Mane 
© rio, nomine Finis pro Alienatione, & pi Fr- 
© non ſolutione inde Dominus diſtringat, ¶ dit. 
© alienavit W. qui alienavit C. Et Def? ut Bali tat 
© livus cogn' caption' Averiorum pro non ſoluſ nen 
© tione predit' 2 ſeperal' Finium, Querſque 
* moratur. Vide 2 Ven. 131, &c, 2 pro 

1 


. 


Replevin & Avowry. 589 


bon two Fines in a Court Baron for not 
giving in Verdis cum Sociis. 


% Vowry-pur Fine eo qd' Quer in Cur? Avowry. 
; A Baron', ſuper veredo' dand*, recel- — 

ſit a Sociis & Senlusꝰ impoſuit ſuper eum 20 8. 
pro non redditione primt veredcr & 108. pro 
u lecundo. Bar quoad predict' 20 s. qd obtu-· 

I lit veredem' & Senellus“ recuſavit recipe, 
m8 Rep! qd* non recuſavit, Et quoad predict 

os. pro ſecundo delicto demur. Raſts Demur. 
e . 52. | 
d' Def? 'feir? de Maner' habuit vis por refuſing 
Franc pleg?, Et Jur* ad Vis Franc' pleg' to be ſwonn 
apnuatim uſi fuer eligere Conſtabularium, Conſtable. 
qui ſi preſens, uſus fuit jurari in Cur?, Et 
Quer' electus Conſtabular* recuſavit preſtare 
lacrum', per quod Senellus impoſuit Finem 
ſuper eum. Vide Co. Em. 572. 

Simili ubi Conſtabular Elect' recuſavit Simile & Bar 
Officium per quod fuit Amerciĩat' ad al' Cur'. per non Reſi- 
Bar ꝗd' tee” electionis non fait reſidens infra dency. 
Letam. 3 Brownl. 337. 

. * Simile de Decennario, &c. in Cur 
Hundred. A/. 476, &c. 


16. Avowry pur Pain &. Bar inde. 


$ D' Det” ſeit' de Manerio infra Hun- Upon « Pre- 
, Qa & de Hundro', habuit viſum ſentment for 
Franc? pleg pro Manerio de omnibus Inha- ſtopping a 
bitantibus infra Hundred, Et quer' fuit pteſen- Wer. 
tat per Jur' pro nocumento per obſtupatio- 
nem vie, qd habuit diem patefacere ſub pena, 
quod non fecit, Unde preſentatio fuit ad 
prox' Cur', Vide Co. Ext. 573. 5 

imile 


ro 8. 1. 


Stat. 13 
Cor. 2. 


Bar. 


Demut 
1. Except 


thar be ought ken to the Plea, viz. That the Defends 


to have 


avow'd, and Ought to have avow'd in Replevin, and at 


not juſtified. 


Replevin & Avowry. 
. © Simile quia non reparavit ſepes ſua Ib. 
© Wilk. 283. hy 


bo - Simile eo qq* Quer obſtupavit coco 
c 


gnum, Bar proteſtand', & c. pro placiofic 

© q& ſtagnum ſuit ſtagnum prox' quer', RH 
travers qa? fuĩt coe ſtagnum. Hern 683, Ich 
. © Advocar pro Pena ſorisſact fro 
© fractione de By-Lawe fact' in Cur' Bafon 
© per Impoſitionem Averiorum in campnum 
© ante Feſtum. Moor. Rep. 75. Simile, Vini. 
Ent. 899. & Bar de injur propr', Et traver 
© qq Homag ſec B/ Law, Et Iſſue inde! 


Soe the Treatiſe concerning Trade and Trak 
men, (in Two Parts) Part I. Of By-Laws, 


Upon 4 Dsftiller or not making due En 
tries in the Excile-Office. 


. 377 Lev. Ent. 152. In Replevin, the D. 
fendant pleads, That the Plaintiff is; 
Diſtiller, and did not make due Entries in th 
Exciſe-Office, Secundum, Stat. 13 Car. 2: Ant 
was therefore (being convicted before the Juſt 
ces. of Peace) adjudped to forfeit 20 s. and 
juſtifies by Vertue of the Juſtices Warrant « 
taking and detaining the Silver Cup until h 
paid the 20s. Bar, That E. A. Anno 166 
was poſſeſſed of the ſaid Goods; and ode 
Amo made his Laſt Will, and the Plaintiff Ext 
cutor thereof, and died: That the Plaini 
proved the Will, and continued poſſeſſed i 
the Goods till the Defendants took them dt i 
ur ſua propr. Demurrer inde. | 
Upon the Argument an Exception was en 


I hat 


. a 
Replevin & Avowry: 551 

oY have juſtified the * 3 but the Court held 

Ive might do the one or the other at his EleRi- 
„oa; the Difference is only this, if he juſfifies he 
cannot have a Retorn as he may if he avows, 
End he need not in this Caſe, becauſe he had 
the Cup again. N + 
A ſecond Exception was, For that he had 2. As tothe 
Myleaded the Condemnation prout pater per Re- Record plead- 
und, and the Juſtices are not in chis Caſe a f 
Court of Record. Sed non 1 

Another Exception was at he pleaded 
Wihe Warrant — ſaying bic in Ca prolar. — 
But it was anſwered, That a Thing, or an N protar' 

ate, executed or determined, need not be &. 
pleaded bic in Cur” prolat'. Vide 3 Levin 
04, Ce. 


7. Avowry ſur Preſcription ou Cuſtom 
de Common. 


Vide ante, ſur Title and Licence dar". 


e D 
f is: 
n 6 : | 
Ane pro dampn fact in libo tento, Bar per Pre- 
Juli rien pro Common. Repl, And traverſes 
nd (be Seizure. Reo” & Iſue, and then the 
ant of Plaintiff pleaded a Releaſe after the laſt 
"il H Continuance. 
1666 
eode Efendants make Cognizance as Bailiffs Cogn. 
ff EU of . B. pro dampn fact in lib# Tem. 
lain Bar, That the Plaintiff was ſeized in Fee of a gur 
fed Nefſuage, with the Appurtenances, and makes 
4 pecial Preſcription for Common for à certain 
me, per que, &-c. Repl, and maintains the Repr. 

as (Fonulance ; and traverſes, that the Plaintiff 
endaſ$s ſeized in Fee of the ſaid Meſſuage. 
= ( 

- 


Rejoinder, 


2 * _— p * — 
2 @ ar * + * — 
** 4 a——e— Im — 224 „„ * 
1 — 7 
—— - EET " 


«92  Replevin & Avowry⸗ 


Rejo. Rejoinder, That he was ſeized in Fee, 1 10 


Iſſue theteon; and a Venire fac? awarded, retot- 
nable Ottab” Pur. Then the Plaintiff (in the 
Awowry) comes and pleads a Releaſe by the 
Releaſe o Defendant Fones after the laſt Continuance, 
alt Continu- Et hoc parat eff veriſicare, Unde pet” judic & 
ation. qd" Fuſtic predict bie ad caption Fur ulteriu 
prace dere nolunt, Ge. The Parties appear, and 
Demur. the Defendants demur to the Plea after the laſt 
Continuance,: as if it had been a Plea at the Af 
zes. Plaintiff joins in Demurrer, but 'twas never 
argued. Vide 2 Lut. 1141, 1142. Where's 
noted, That the Plea of Releaſe was ill, be. 
cauſe no Place is alledged where the Releaſe 

was made: That it is not agreeable to the Fo 

of good Precedents, for it ought to have bet 


How the Re- pleaded after this Manner, viz. Et predict 


leaſe ougbt to A, dic gd, quer' poſt ule Continuation 
1 © placiri predict ſciltꝰ poſt (tiel jour) ul” pret 
<4 © rit de quo die Logue predict” ultꝰ continu: 
© ſuit hic uſque ad hunc diem ſcilt' in Octab 

Ec. tunc prox” fequen' & ante hunc dien 

* {ciit? (tiel jour) predict' quer', &0c, 4 

Co. Ent. 5 17. Aff. 8. & 417. Clift. 620. And 

that ſo it ought to be, as is reſolved i 

18; E. 4. 136. Nelv. 141. Raſt, Releaſe 1 2. an 

divers other Books; but in this Caſe it does no 

appear at what Day the Releaſe was made. 

If it ought Again, That the Plea is not well pleade 
not to have becauſe not pleaded in Bar, viz. Judgment 
been pleaded Adios, &*c. as adjudged 3 Cro. 49. Sit Th 
in Bar. Cockam's Caſe, and Dyeri 361. tho' in ne 
Dyer in the Margent, it ſeems to have bes 

allow?d as here, but two Juſtices e contra, 

it ought to conclude ſi Action, and it ſeems! 

be the beſt Opinion, for an Accord or N 

leaſe is an abſolute Bar at all Times, 


x Th 


w_.. KM. 


rg hey OY. or — 2 by by py 


as. w A <: = ows Al ec —=2 


c . e's b 
Neplevin & Avowry. 593 | 
10 That this Form ſeems to be a proper Way of A proper 4 
pleading a Collateral Thing, © that happened Form of fuch 4 
he after the Action was pending; wiz. Quer Pleading. 1 
Action ſuam predit# ulterins manutenere ſeu ulte- 
rius habere non debet, as Raft Appeal) in mort” 4. 
Dert en Releaſe 7. Tit Attaiht en Bly 2. For 
this admits, That the Action was well brought ; 
but the Plaintiff, by reaſon of ſuch new Matter, 
gught not to proceed therein; and he is of 5 
Opinion, it had here been a good Bar if well 1 
pleaded; arid refers to Sibley and Ramlin is Caſe, : 
2 Roll, Abridg. 412. g 


Juomry upon 4 Surcharge of Common, &c. 


VI Lut. 1238. Narr. for taking his Avowry. 
Cattle at N. in Loco vor Le Moore; 

Defendant avows, for that 4. B. was ſeized in 

Fee of a Meſſuage, &c. and had Common by 

Preſcription in Loco in quo, and demiſed the ſaid 

Meſſuage to the Defendant, and he avows 

Damage Feſant: Bar by the Piaimiff, That Bar. 

his Leſſor alſo had Common by Preſctiption 

tor a certain Time in the Year. Rep”, Thar 

the Plaintiff had ſurcharged the Common, Cc. 

roy and Iſſue upon the Surcharge. Rejo 
n | 

>. And aſter Verdict for the Defendant, it was Verdict pro 

moved in Arreſt of Judgment, That the Iſſue PA 

was immaterial, becauſe one Commoner cannot 

diſtrain the Cattle of another Commonet with If one Com- 

him, altho' he may diſtrain the Cattle of a monet may 

meer Stranger, who had no Pretence of Right __ 5 

and cited 22 H/. Pl. 65. Stiles 423. Telv, 104. > pb 

&' Bratt. lib. 4. 229. And hereupon a Rule ner > 

was made to arreſt the Judgment viſi, &c. 

And that the Matter was afterwards debated 


by Councel on both Sides, and that the Rule 


Q q was 


594 Replevin & Avowry. 
was not then diſcharged, nec adbuc eſt ut 
credo, ſays the Reporter. He further obſerves, 
that 46 Ed. 3. was cited on the other Part, 
where, in a Recordare, the Defendant avow'd, 
for that the Plaintiff had Common for 20 
Beaſts, and he put in 24, per quod he di. 
ſtrain'd the 4 Damage-Feſant : But that this 
Awvowry being general, it was moſt probable 
that he was the Owner of the Soil that avow'd, 
than a Commoner ; for it he had been a Com- 
moner, it is to be preſumed, that ſome Men- 
tion would have been made thereof. Id. 1241, 


Cogn pro dampn' fact in libero Tento', Bar 
per Preſcription & Cuſtom pro ſola G. 
ſeperal” Paſtur, G. Demurr inde. 


J. De as Bailiffs of Sir H. N. make 

Conuſance pur Damage. Feſant in 

Bar. Libs tento. Bar, Qd Quer ſeit” fuit de uno libero 

tento rent” de Manerio de M. per reddit & ſervic, 

Et fuer diverſa al liba' tenta acetiam diverſa 

Cuſtumar tenta parcel Manerii predict', Et qd 

eperal tenen ten torum lib rum babuer ſimulcum 

tenen Cuſtumar ſolam & ſeperal Paſtur in loco, 

e. pro omnibus Averiis, except”, Cc. ſuper eo- 

rum reſpediva liba' tenta levan per totum annu, 

Et in eodem Manerio fuit Cons? qd' ſepera Tenen 

Meſſuag Cuſtumar uf fuer ſimulcum, libis' tenen 

ſolam & ſeperal” paſtur ut ſupra. To this Bar 

Demurr. the Plaintiff (in the Avowty) demurr'd gene. 
rally. Vide x Saun. 348. 

This Cale is briefly reported in x Levin 

Exceptions to 268. where *cis ſaid, That firſt, Exceptions 

the .Plead. Were taken to the Pleading : (1.) That the 

ings. Preſcr ption in himſelf, and all the Freeholdets, 


is not good, every one ought to preſcribe for 
himſelf, 


* 


Replevin & Avowry, 595 
himſelf, and not one for himſeif, and all che | 
Freeholders together wich the Copyholders ; N 
and yet he lays a Cuſtom for the Copyholders, whe” Ge * 
together with the Freeholders, and ſo mixes a mixed. 
Preſcription and Cuſtom together, which may 
hotbe, for the one is laid in the Perſon, and 
the other in the Place 3 but he ought to have 
laid, That he, and all thoſe whoſe Eſtate he 
had, together wich the Freeholders and Copy- 
holders, à tee quo, Oc. babuerunt, & c. But the 
Court over. ruled theſe Exceptions upon a Cale 
between Rertleborougb and Wills, Trin. 1654. 
Rotl. 549. where ſuch Pleading was adjudged 
good. And as to the Matter it was argued, _ _ 
That a Preſcriptionto have Salam Paſturam, and If che tag 
to exclude the Lord, is not good; and cited 57.7 
Fitz. Preſcription 51. Hut. 45. Co. Lit. 222. 
Yelv. 192. 2 Cro, 208. Yelv. 187. & 2 Cro. 256, 
by which they inferr'd, That the Tenants may 
preſcribe to have Part of the Profits for the. 
Whole Year, or the whole Profits for Part of 
the Lear; but here it is to exclude the Lord 
of all the Profits; and it is like a Cuſtom to 
have the whole Common, and exclude che 
Lord: But to this it was anſwered and reſolved, 
That tis not to exclude the Lord of the whole 
Profits, for he ſhall have tlie Mines, the Trees, 
&c. And 'tis not like a Preſcription, to have 
all the Common and exclude the Lord, for that 
is repugnant ; for in all Caſes of Common, the The Lord is 
Lord is to intercommon with the Tenants in to inter- 
the Nature of Common; and therefore to ex- common. 
clude the Lord, is repugnant to the Eſſence of 
Common : And Judgment was given for the Judic pro 
Defendant (in the Avowry.) Idem 269. The Def” in Ad- 
Reporter refers to Vaughan, Rev. 251. where vow'. 
the Court was divided in the like Caſe in Coi 
Banco, ſcil, Vaugban and Tirril againſt the Cu- 

Q-q 2 ſtom, 


1 — pw " L — — * >. a $ S. 0 4 
2 7 _— 7 *> * =. of - [4 3 0 ay J 
2 - — — 


wet” - i 
= \ * 
—— 82 — 9 


1 DEI NE En bt Dr SS ppc _—_ 
«a * 
— — 6 = 

e . [CCC 


5 Replevin & Avowry. 
ſtom, Archer and Wild for it; and alſo he te. 
ſers to another Cafe following in his Report, 
int Hopkins and Robinſon, ſuch a Cuſtom was 
admitted to be good. 
If the Lord Sed wide 1 Saund. 352, 353, where he lays, 
oy Grant ex. That Mr. Coleman, the Plaintiff's Counce|, 
_ him argued well to ſhew how the firſt Uſage was “ 
; and how the Lord by Grant had excluded 
himſelf; and that he cited a Cale, Trin, 1654 
Rot lo. 519: in Banco Regis, where a Man claim. i 
ed a Fold-Courſe, and excluded the Owner 
of the Soil by Preſcription, -and adjudged good. 
And he further adds, That the Court in thi; 
Caſe ſeem d to incline, that the Plea and Pre. 
ſcription was good; but that they directed a 
Tryal at Bar to try the Verity of it, to which 
5 it was conſented: And that afterwards, in Eaſter 
Tryal at Bir, Term, a Tryal was held at Bar, but that the 
and PR Tenants: could not prove their Title to he a3 © 
1 they had alledged it; whereupon the Lord had 10 
a Verdict, and ſo no Judgment was in the 
Cale upon the Demurrer. 
Vide 1 Vent. 163, 383. #1 
Vide Avowry pur Common, Cc. Co. Ent. 571, 
2 Brownl. Rep. 6:1. 1 Browne 304. 3 Brown. . 
299. Hern 661. Er vide Town's Tables, d 
Bar al 4uowries, Tit“ Repleviy, Alſo Corn- 
-wal's Tables, Tit“ cod”. 


- 


Aliter 


liter 


Replevin & Avowry. 3227 


Aliter ſur Preſcription on Cuſtom, G- 
Ba mae. .-: 


Cogn” ſur Preſcription pur Toll, & Bar per Te: 
nancy in Ancient Demeſne. 


IN Replevin, the Defendants as Bailiffs of Cogm. 
J. B. make Conuſance; and ſgy, That 

the ſaid F. B. at the Time when, Cc. was 

ized in his Demeſue (without ſaying of what 

Eſtate) of an ancient Market in H. and pre- 

cribes for Toll for Hogs fold in the Market, 

to be paid by the Buyers, and to diſtrain for 

rr and fo juſtify the Dillggls 

jor 1 J. Toll for two Hogs bought by 

Plaintiff in the ſaid Market. 

The Plaintiff pleads in Bar, That he the gar. 
laid Time, quo, Cc. fuit & eff Tenant and 
Inhabitant of the Manor of H. which was 
ncient Demeſne, and free of Toll in all Places 
thin the Kingdom of Ezg/and. Demurrer, pemure 
nd Joinder in Demurrer; and after ſeveral 
xceptions to the Bar, as not well pleaded to 
title the Plaintiff to ſuch Privilege, and alſo 
hat it was too general, Judgment was given 


or the Plaintiff, Vide 2 Lut. 1144, Ge. 


/ 


f. © Qd' Epus' habuit tolnet' per tor” annu' Traverſe. 
de omnibus Merchandiz, &c. Bar de injur 

propr', Et travers Preſcription. 1 440d. 

lntr. 3 22. | 

d' Decanus, &c. feir de Manerio 

habuer Mercat' in Villa & tolner de Averiis 

vendit', ac diſtrixer” pro tolnet' inſolut', Traverſe de 


d' Manerium fuit dimils' al G. qui affign' Preſcription. 


Def” qui advocat pro tolneto Vacc vendit'. 
Qq 3 * Repl 


598 Keplevin & Avowry. 

L © Rep! de inju!* prop” & travers' Preſcription fl / 
© de Toll. Hern 670. Vide Upper-Bench, W* rc 
© Pref. 107. Sur Avowry pur Toll” Mercat, I pi 
© Et Bar per Preſcription fore quiet” de tolnet I ne 
© in H. & alibi per tot” Com', Rep!' & TH B 


© yers Preſcription. ca 
ff. * Avowry pro Domino Hundred? habe lo 
© bona waviata. Hers 676. 'Q 


Liberty of . © Q&T. ſeit de Manerio habuit libum f d 
Foldage. © taldaghyper tot villam, Et ſi aliquis al erext in 
: © Faldam, Def? proftravit illam & cepit e lo 

* Hurdies dampn' facien' per quod, &c. B gt 

* qq' Quer ſeit' de alio Manerio in eadem Villa p. 

© habuit Faidagium fine Contradictione, E id 

© travers? -Preſcrjprion alledge per Def*,' & 


p Bench Preſ. 106. in 
Ordinance 5 Qd' Def per cons? Manerii ſuit electu ho 
Cur' traverſe FMperviſor Camporum & cepit Averia dampd lac 
2 s Kee % 4 facien' in 20 Acr' terre, contra Or din: & 
© tionem in Cur. Bar, qd” R. ſeit' dimiſiſſ in 
quer, Et traverſe Ordinance, 1 Brom ip 
© 160. | | | 25 pr 


18. Avowry G. Bar de Incloſures, I p; 
Awvowry for Rent Arrear, and "i in Defett . 


pairing the Hedges. Fa 

: | po 

J. Ty an Avowry for Rent Arrear upon Þ pr 
| Demiſe: © Bar, Qd' quer' ſeir' de ub ex 
* Clo? Paſture contigue adjacen' predict' loc ev 
in quo, &c. Et Del? & omnes ill? quorum pr 


* &c. uſi fuer? reparare ſepes int locum in quo] in 
* &e. Et Clauſum quer*, pro defcu* quarun T 
* Averia. intraverunt, Demurrer inde. 2 Sm R 
* 284. 3) Is C1 17) 


7 71 


Replevin & Avowry. 599 

ml Et predict' R. P. dic? qd' pred? T. L. Bat al Avoy. 
cb ro'ne preal egat caption' Averiorum pred? in . 

u predicto loco in quo, &c. Juſtam advocare 

non debet nec predict A. W. & T. L. ut 

Ballivi ejuſdem T. L. eadem ro'ne eandem 

* captionem Averiorum predict' in predict 

loco in quo, &c. juſtam cognoſcere debent, 

* Quia dic' qd' ipſe idem R. P. predicto tee 

quo, &c. ac diu antea poſſeſſionat' ſuit de & 


in uno Clo? Paſture in B. predict, predicto 
e loco vocat' P. in quo, &c. prox & conti- 
dat gue adjacen', Et ulterius idem R. P. dic' qd 
il predict' T. L. ac omnes il! quorum ſtatum 
EH idem T. L. modo habet & predicto tee quo, 
Kc. habuit de & in clo' predict vocat' P. 

in quo, &c. a tee cujus contrar memoria 
qu hominum non exiſtit fecerunt & reparaver' & 
pdf facere & reparate uſi fuer* & conluever' ſepes 
ing & fenſuras int? predict Clauſum vocat? P. 
ni in quo, &c. & predict Clauſum Paſture 
nl ipfius R. Et ulterius idem R. dic' qd ante 


predictꝰ tempus quo, &c. necnon dicto tee 
quo, &c. Sepes & Fenſur' int? predictꝰ Clau. 
um in quo, &c. Et predict Clauſum 
Paſture ipſius R. P. fuer' fra” apert' & in 
decaſu ob defem' reparationis eorundem per 
uod Averia ipſius R. predict' in Clauſis Pa- 
ure ipſius R. predict tunc antea poſit exiſten' 
poſtea & ante predict? tempus quo, &c. ſcilt 
predict 27 die Febr' Anno 18 ſupradicto 
extra Clauſum paſtur ipſius R. predict 
evaſerunt & per ruptur' ſepium & fenſur? 
predict in predictum Clauſum in quo, &c. 
intraver & ibm' remanſer' quouſq; predict? 
T. L. A. W. & T. poſtea & antequam idem 
R. P. aliquam noticiam habuit ſeu habere 
potuit de exiſtentia Averiorum predia” in 
predito loco in quo, &c. ceper* & injuſte 
Q q 4 © detinuer” 


60  —Repleyin & Avowry. 


.* detinuer” contra Vad' & Pleg' modo & forma 
_ © prout predict” R. verſus eos ſuperinde inde 
© queiitur, Et hoc parat' eſt verificare, Unde 
© ex quo predict T. A. W. & I. caption & 
© detention” Averiorum predict {uperius cogn 
idem R. P. petit judiciu' & dampna fy; 
© occo'ne caption” & iujuſte detention? Averio. 
© rum predict' bi adjudicari, 8&c. Del mo- 
Def' demur, ratur in Lege, Et | 


where ic appears, That Error was brought hy 
the Plaintiff . upon this Judgment, and the 
Error and Plaintiff's Councel inſiſted, - that the Cattle 
Judgment could not be diſtrained, becauſe they eſcape 
affirmed. for Default of Fences, which was the Fault d 
the Defendant L. ee who ought 1 have 
„n. Tepaired them, as appears by the Record; but 
en Judgment was affirmed Ne, &c. And dhe 
Court relied much on the Caſe, 10 H. J. 21.6 
where tis ſaid, It the Cattle eſcape into any 
Ground, and the Lord diſtrain them, that 
the Diltreſs is good, and that it was not mate 
rial whether they were levant or couchant, 0 
not, Then the Councel moved, That there 
was an'Error in the Judgment, for the Word 
1deo conſiderat” eft qd' predict R. P. nil capiat y 

bre ve ſuum ſed ſit in mia pro flo clamore ſuo, 
predict T. L. A. M. W. P. & T. L. eant ind 
ſine die, &c. were wholly left out of the Re 
cord; whereupon the Affirmation of the Judg 
ment was ſtay'd, and afterwards the Reco 
being amended, and the Words inſerted, | 
was moved again, and thereupon Judgmen 
was abſolutely affirm'd in Banco Regis, Vis 

2 Saund, 290. MTS 
; And the Reporter adds, That he though 
e 2 a bs 

Wies ; the Caſe hard to be maintain'd ; for there 1s: 
& vall Difference between a Lord e 
| ; | withit 


| Quer? jung' in morac, ii 
_ pro © Fe Judic' pro Def'. Vide eund. 28), 
S1. 


Replevin & Avowry. 60 r 


within his Seigniory, and a Leſſor diſtraining 
for Rent reſerved upon, bis own. Leaſe ; for 
the Lords had nothing to do with the Land or 
the Fences, and fo tis not material to him if 
the Fences be in Repair or not: But *tisother- 
wife of a Leſſor, for himſelf ought to repair, 
or provide that his Tenant repair them, for 


otherwile he takes Advantage of his own 


Wrong, which would be inconvenient ; and 


that this Diverſity ſeem'd to be warranted by 
the Books, Mich. 14, 15 Elix. Dyer 317, 318. 
d. 4. 49. J. 7 H. 7. 1. 1 H. 7. 7. 
But if the Cattle eſcape into the Land without 
any Default of Fences; or that the Tenant of 
the Land where they are diſtrained is not 
bound to repair the Fences, by Default of 
which the Cattle eſcape, and are diſtrained; 
it is not material to the Lord whether they are 
levant or couchant, or not. Idem 289, 290. 

See more concerning Bar de Iucloſures. Raſt. 
Entr. 561. Dyer 365. 3 Brownl. 321. 1 Browne 
309, 310. Winch, En, 816, 928, &c. And 
ſee more thereof in Tit Treſpaſs. 


19. Gage Deliverance : 
Et 
20. Judicia in Replevin, 


"Ide ante; and ſee the Two General Tables 
of Precedents, which will dire& to all 
Pleadings relating to this Title of Replewin, 


Some 


602 


Re plevin & Avowry. 


Some Obſervations upon ſeveral of the afore. 
mentioned Avowries, &c. 


HE Form of an Avowry for a Rent. 
Charge. 1 Saund. 191, 196, 197. 

If an Avowry be made for Rent, and it ap- 
pears by the Parties own ſhewing, that Part 
of it is not yet due; the Avowry is good for 
the Reſidue. Id. 285, 286. 

But if it appear that the Avowant had Title 
only to two Parts of the Rent for which he 


avows, all the Avowry ſhall abate. Id. 286. 


In an Avowry for Rent and Nomine Pænæ 
together, without alledging any Demand of 
the Rent; the Avowry is good for the Rent, 
altho? ill for the Nomine Peng. Id. 286. Fot 
the Nomine Pænæ is not forfeited without De. 
mand of the Rent. 

To what Intents the Time of Sun-ſet is the 
Time appointed by Law to demand Rent, 
Id. 287. Le Seignior poit diſtrain fon Tenant, 
que ad Common ſans number, & ſurcharge le Soil, 
Id. 345. | 

It +4] Cattle eſcape into any Ground, and 
the Lord diſtrain them, the Diſtreſs is good. 
2 Saund. 289, 290. 

Where tis not material if the Cattle diſtrain'd 
were levant and couchant, or not. id. 

Where the Cattle eſcape out of a Cloſe next 
adjacent, adjudged that they may be diſtrain'd 
for Rent, altho' that they eſcape for Default of 
Fences, which the Party diſtraining ought to 
have repair d. Lid. 

Where the Lord of the Soil may diſtrain for 
Damage Feſant, altho' he hath not any Inte- 
reſt in the Herbage. 14. 328. 


Where 


Replevin & Ayowry. 603 
Where a Licence to put Cattle into a Com. h 
mon muſt be by Deed. Id. 326, Ce. 
la Avowry for Rent, and Iſſue tried for the 
Avowant, the Jury omit to enquire of the Value 
of the Cattle, it may not be ſupplied by Writ 
„of Inquiry. 1 Levinz 255. 
One as Bailiff in a Conuſance p eads Proper- 
y in a Stranger, and allowed here upon De- 
t nurrer, tho' in a County Court not good on 
r Demurrer. 14. 90. 
Avowry for Rent due at a latter Day no 
e Bar of Rent due at a former Day, nor is a 
Recovery in Debt for Rent due at a latter 
Day; Bar in Debt for Rent due at a former 
Day, as Acquittance is. Id. 43. 1 
A Commoner may diſtrain the Cattle of a 1 
Stranger being upon the Land, but in his A- | . 
yowry he ought to ſhew Damage to his Com- & 
mon, 2 Lev. 252. 9 
Preſcription for Sola paſtura may he without i 
16 _ and couchant, but aliter of Common, iN 
t, . 2. W | 
t, That Property pleaded in a Stranger may be b 
il, Neither in Bar or Abatement, and he need not 
wow to have a Retorn. Id. 92. 
d Concerning By-Laws made by the Steward, 
d. ¶ vich Conſent of the Homage, ill. 3 Lev. 49. 
Alſo a By- Law, that the Penalties ſhall be levied 
'd by Diſtreſs and Sale of Goods, ill. Id. 281. 
Concerning Diſtreſs of Cattle coming to 
xt London to be ſold. Id. 260. 
d That a Deſendant may either avow, and 
of have a Retorn, or juſtify and have no Retorn. 
to A. 104. Et fic deceters, © A 


For 


A 


K [ 
E. 
4 

4 


604 


15. Upon what and whole Plea the Party ol 


Replenun & Arb. 


Fur 4 brief Learning of this great Branch of 1 


Avowries. 


See D'anvers's Ai 3 Cc. Tit 
Avoury, viz. 


I. W Here Seiſin is neceſſary to avow, i * 


644 
2. What Act ſhall be a good Seiſin, 645 2 
3. By whom in reſpect of the Eſtate it 


ſhall. be good, as _ Homage and other 


Services, ibid. 2 
4. By whoſe Hands, as by Tenant in Right, 
"1 „ 
5. Seiſin, by whom ſhall ſerve for others to *: 
avow, ibid. 
6. In what Caſes Seiſin of one Thing ſhall} 
ſerve for another to avow, ibid. 
. Who may change the Avowry, 647 
8. Upon whom it may be, as upon Baron 
and Feme, Cc. ibid. 
9. Who may compel the Lord to avow 
upon hin, 648 
10. In what Caſes the Lord hath Election 
upon whom he will to avow, + 649 
11. Upon whom, and for what Thing, it 
may be made. 650 
12. In the Name of whom it ſhall be made, 
651 
13. In what Caſes it is to be made upon — 
Perſon in certain, and in what ooh 
ibi 
14. Juſtification in Avowry concerning it, 


652 


may avow, 653 
16. Plead- 


Replevin & Avowry. 60 5 
16. Pleading therein, viz. The Form of 
an Avowry at Common Law, ibid. 
17. Surpluſage in an Avowry, concerning 
, | | 654 
18. The Form upon the Statute of 21 H. 8, 
ca. 19. 32 H. 8. ca. 37. ibid. 
19. Where but one, and where ſeveral 
Avowries, ibid, 
20. Certainty in an Avowry, concerning 
it, A 655 
' MW 21. Pleas in Bar to an Avowry, and what 
may | be. pleaded at the Common 
Law, as Hors de ſon Fee, ibid. 
122. What Pleas ſince the Statute, and where 
| an Avowry 15 made according to the 


Statute, 656 

23. Where the Seiſin, and where the Te- 

nure ſhall be traverſed. ibid. 
TRESPASS. 


An Iuntrocluct ion thereto. 


Here being lately printed, wiz. Ann? 

I704. a Freaſe 33 Treſpaſſes eee 
Armit, in the Preface whereof the Author ing Treſpaſs 
lerves, That ſuch Actions are very nume- * & Armis. 
„ tho' ſince the Statute, of more Coſts than 
amage, they have been frequently turn'd into 
tions on the Caſe. - And as to an Objection, 
at Ejectments as to Titles have juſtled out 
old elaborate Pleadings in this Action; yet 
ſome Caſes he ſays many would adviſe to 


try 


606 


TRESPASS. 
try a Title rather by Treſpaſs or Replevin 
Ce. if they foreſee a material Point which 
they would fix upon; and therefore he h. 
thereby endeavoured to make the Piece mor, 
compleat, c. And indeed, he has painfully 
and learnedly run thro' the Particulars relating 
to this Title of Treſpaſs, by adding particulzg 
Caſes and Authorities, with References to pre 
per printed Precedents. I ſhall therefore on) 
take a Cutſory View of his Treatiſe, with thi 
ſeveral Branches of Precedents for Pleading 
therein, as found in the General Tables, an 
inſiſt only upon thoſe Precedents in Serjean 
Lutwyche's Entries, which have been publiſhe 
ſince the aforeſaid Book of Treſpaſſes, wil 
ſome other modern Reports. 


| 
| 
1 
b 
1 
I 


The CONTENTS of the foremention ö 
Treatiſe. h; 


(0, 


* ſeveral Matters premiſed in the fi fn 
Six Chapters of the ſaid Treatiſe; thef® 
Chap. VII. Shews what Perſons may bave ii 
Action, and againſt what Perſons it mat 
brought, and for what, with Remarks aff,” 
References to the Writs, Declarations, « 
Pleadings applied thereunto. 
Chap. VIII. Several Sorts of Treſpaſſes. @"* 
Aſſault, Battery, Wounding and Impriſonm 
what amounts to an Aſſault, what to 4 Batt 
with References to Counts, Bars, and Pleadi . 

to Aſſault and Battery by Way of Juſtiſeaſ 
and Excuſe, and of Son Aſſault Demeſnel'* 
Chap. IX. Of Faux TImpriſonment, the i 
and Declaration; and of B. and Fuſtificatinl 


0. 


— 


The Contents, Oc. 607 
the Impriſonment by Officers, Aſſiſtants, Proceſs 
Ke. 2017 RR ſuch 2 Ps 
Chap. X. Of Torts as to Chattels Real and 
Perſonal, De Averiis in General and in Par- 
ticular. Of Tort to Goods in General and Par. 
ticalar, with reference to Precedents and Plead. 
ing to each. | 
Chap. XI. Of Torts done to Inheritance and Free. 
bold, with the Appurtenances and Incidents there. 
unto, as to Gates, Trees, Mounds, Warren 
1 Wy} g 
"i Pi/chary, &c. 
up. XII. Of che Common Bar, and the Rea- 
a ſor of it. Of the new Aſſignment, and the 
Fa Nature of that ; and of giving Colour, and the 
Learning of that. 
Whip. XIII. Of General Rules of Pleading in 
Treſpaſs, and where a Man may Ie tbe Gene. 
ral Iſſue, and where he muſt plead ſpecially ; and 
. / Pleas amounting to the General Iſue; and of 
tone 7uſt fication by involuntary Treſpaſs. 
Map. XIV. Of Pleas in Bar, or Fuſt ifications 
wncerning Inheritances, by way of Excuſe, as 
* for publick good Neceſſity, &c. 
„ held ap. XV. Of Bars or Juſt ificat ions by Tith, 
be il” Hine, Demiſe, Deviſe, Diſtreſs, &c. 
* Wip. XVI. Of Fuſtification by reaſon of Pre. 
* _ (or Grant) as for Common, a Way, 
Wncloſures, &c. per Ancient Demeſne, 8c. 
„ d in bat Caſes 8 Man may juſtify an Entry 
mo anothers Lands to retake his own Goods. © 
ap. XVII. Of Bars in Treſpaſs concerning 
ods and Chattels, by Title or Excuſe, Property, 
* endition, Gift, Impignoration, Allowance by 
| ; Bars as to Writings, by Cuſtoms, by 
el KC for Neceſſity, Execution of Law, 
be N. By Statute of Limitations, Precedents of 
n, Quoad Averia abduct' fugar' perculs', 


on 
Chap. 


, 
y 
E 
at 
0 
nh 


' 
! 
. 


60L 


The Contents, Gt. 


Chap. XVIII. Of Diſcontinuances, and Omiſſin 


in Fuſtification as to Things or Time. * 

Chap. XIX. Of other Bars in Treſpaſs, - a h 
Concord, Arbitrament, Amends tendred, Li. 
cence, Releaſe, by Default of the Plaintiff him. 
7 by Action depending, or by Recovery in 
other Action, &C. 


Chap. XX. Of Traverſes in Treſpaſs, and then | 


in, after ſome General Rules, of traverſing thy 
Diſcent, Seiſin or Diſſeiſin, dying ſeized, Com 
veyance; and of traverſing the Time and Plac, 
and where be need not; where a Man muſt tra 
verſe, and where a Traverſe is not neceſſary u 
conclude, Quz eſt eadem tranſgreſſio, and 
the Force and Effect of thoſe Words. 

Chap. XXI. Of foinder in Treſpaſs, and 
Joint Treſpaſſors. . 

Chap. XXII. Of ſevering in Pleas, andthe Cn 
ſequence thereof. | 

Chap. XXIII. Of the Replication, De injui 
ſua propr', or, Son Tort Demeſne ; the N 
ture of it, and where neceſſary, and where gu 
with 4 Traverſe, Of the Traverſe, 'Abl 
tali cauſa, here it ſhall be taken general, 
as to take in Iſue all the Matter of the Ples, 4 
where only one particular Point. 

Chap. XXIV. In what Caſes the Defendant 
bis Plea, and the Plamiiff in his Replicati 


ought to ſhew or make hu Title-in certain, « 
in what not. | 


Chap. XXV. XXVI. XXVII. XXVIII. XXI 


F the Venire and Venue; of joining Iſue; 
Evidence, of Verditts, of Damoges, Ingut 
of Coſts, and of Judgment, and their Entries 

Chap. XXX. What will amount to a good 
charge of Treſpaſs, or of the Action, and u 


will not + 


„Thus far concerning the aforeſaid Treatiſe. 
by eext we will look into the Diviſions and parti- 
cular Heads of Pleadings in this Action, as they 
in. and in the General Tables, 


-I Mr. Townſend's Tables, the Bars and 
Pleadings in Treſpaſs are thus divided: 


V1 Z. | 
I. Ommunes Bar inde delibo? Tento. 
2, Novel Aﬀignment. 


3. Loci in Quibus. 

4. Travers de jour, & Lieu. 

4. Bar per Concoid. 

6. Per Amends. 

7. Per Licence ou Requeſt, 

8. De Batterie. | 

9. Bar de Impriſonment per Proceſs. 

10. Pur Miſdeameanor. 

11. Bar de Menaces. | 

12. Bar per Officers, ou Proceſs. 

13. Bar de Rent ou Services. 

14. De Amercements. | 

15. Bar fur Title de Frank-Tenement. 

16. Per Grant del Roy. 

17. Per fine. 

18. Per Feoffment. 

19. De Diſſeiſin. 

20. De Terres in Tail. 

21. Per Diſcent. 

22. Per Eſcheat. 

23. Per Jointenancie- 

24. Per Judgment. 

25. Per Demiſe. | 

26. De Cuſtumarie Terres. 

7 27. De Rectories & Diſmes. "og 
R c 28. 


610 TRESPASS. 
28. Bar de Atbres. 
29. De Avers. 
30. Bar de Biens. 
31. De Eſcripts. 
32. Sur Preſcription de Common. 
33. De Eſtovers. 
34. De Cbimin. 
35. De Inclolures, 
i 36. De Weifes & Eſtiays. 
37. De Wreck. 
38. De Warrens & Hunting, 
39. De Chaſes. 
40. De Piſcharie. 
41. De Fairs & Markets. 
42. Sur Cuſtoms. 
43. Sur 2 Preſcriptions, 
44. Bar General. 
45. Several Pleas, 
46. Bar and Fudgment. 


47. Judgment: 


2 


Thoſe in Mr. Cornwall“ Table are pla 
thus, Viz. 


* Oes' Bar inde de libero Tento!'. 
4. Novel Aſſignment. 
3. Non Cul. 


4. Loci in quibus. 

5. Travers de jour ou lieu. 

6. Per Concord ou Releaſe. 

7. Per Amends. 

8. Per Licence ou Requeſt. 

9. De Batterie. 

19, De Impriſonment per Proceſs. 
11, Pur Miſdemeanor. © 

12, Per Officers ou Proceſs. 

13, De Nocumentis. 


TRESPASS. 611 © 


14. De Rent ou Services. 
15. De Amercements. 
16. Sur Title de Frank-Tenement. 
17. Per Feoffment. 
18. Per Diſſeiſin. 
19. Per Terres & Devile. 
20. Per Deſcent, &c. 
21, Per Jointenancie. 
22. Per Demiſe. 
23. De Cuſtumarie Terres. 
24. De Rectories & Diſmes. 
25. De Arbres. 
26, De Avers. 
27. De Biens. 
28, De Eſcripts. 
29. Sur Preſcription de Common. 
30. De Eſtovers. 
31. De Chimin. 
32. De Incloſures. 
33. De Waifes & Eſtrays. 
34. De Wreck. 
lll 35. De Warrens & Hunting. 
36. De Chaſes. 
37. De Fairs & Markets. 
38. Sur Cuſtoms, &c. 
0. 39. Bar General. 
40. Several Pleas. 
41. Bar and Fudgment. 
42. Judgments. 


Next we will proceed to thoſe Pleadings, 
xc, in Serjeant Lutrwyche's Entries, not men- 
oned in the Treatiſe of Treſpaſſes, with ſome 
Obſervations from other modern Reports. 


R r2 Firſt 


5 
1 
+ 


612 TRESPASS. 


Firſt, by Way of Precaution, it may bY 1. 
obſerved, 


Defendants That by Stat. 8 & 9 V. 3. cap. 11. II 
acquitted in enacted, That where ſeveral Perſons ſhall by 
Treſpaſs, Sc. made Defendants in any Action of Treſpak 
og of Fuit. Aſſault, falle Impriſonment, or Eject ione Firme 
unleſs, Cc. any one or more ſhall upon Tryal be acquitted 3: 
by Verdict: Every Perſon fo acquitted ſhale" 
recover his Coſts of Suit, unleſs the Judge {halfW&*"! 
immediately after the Tryal in open Court cer 
tiſy upon the Record, That there was a re: 
ſonable Cauſe for making ſuch Perſon or Per 
ſons a Defendant or Defendants to fuc 
Action. 
Cofts of Suit That in all Actions of Treſpaſs commence 
upon a wil- in any Court of Record at Weſt minſter „ When ad 
ful and mali- it ſhall appear at the Tryal, and be certified 
— 1 Treſ- by the Judge on the Back of the Record 
Ho That the Treſpaſs was wilfal and malicious 


the Plaintiff ſhall not only recover his Dama 
ges, but his ſull Coſts of Suit. 


Bar in TRESPASS. . 


Bar by Abatement for Privilege, for that he wi 
a Servant to one of the Clerks in Chancery. 


2 
Abatement. /. NI for Aſſault and Battery; Defen 1 
dant pleads in Abatement, for that 

he is a Servant to one of the Clerks in Chang 

cery; Plaintiff demurs. 

3 Excepti Three Exceptions were taken to this Plea 
ons. (1.) That it was not ſhewn what ſort of Servant 
he was. (2.) It was not ſhewn at what Place ha 

was retain'd, or was his Servant, (3.) That 

the Plea was not with an Averment of hoc p 


rat eſt werificare, þ 
1. To 


n Fey n ad a 


TRESPASS. 613 


bl 1. To the firſt it was ſaid, That the Privi- R. 
ge was general for all Servants, and for that 7: The Pri- 
hs good. | 5 vilege good. 
. As to the ſecond, That the Privilege was , To be tri 
t to be tried by the Country, but by Certifi- ed by Certifi- 
Bic of the Matter of Record out of Chancery. cate. 
3. It was anſwer'd, That the Fault of A- 3. But Judg. 
ment was only Matter of Form, and the ment pro ue 
emurrer is general, and therefore no Advan- _ Default 
ge could be taken ſor that Defect: But not- ment _ 
ithſtanding Judgment was given for the Plain- 
ffor Default of Averment, but the other 
xceptions were not reſolved. Vide 2 Tut. 
Pear: Lu Nary for taking a ll 
Vide 2 Lut. 1529. Narr ſor taking a Hogs- 
ad of Syder; Pea in Abatement be Out. — — 
wry after Judgment at the Suit of E. C. Plain. after Judg- 
H demurs ſpecially, Eo d plucitum illud ment, and 
F omnino incertum, in hoc qd' non apparet Utrum Plaintiff de- 
wedief J. E. vel predici- W. qui ad breve ! 
ar” predict reſpondere compelli non debet, Et pro 
4d placitum ill eff duplex male incept & male 
cus & caret forma, oe. . 
One Exception only was taken to the faid g. ception 
es, vix. For that the Defendants ven“ &. de- 1. 2 i”f, 
d, Cc. Et dic ga? ipſe, (where it ſhould be and debet for 
) ad breve & narr” reſpondere compelli non de- debent, and 
enk (inſtead of non debert,) and allowed a good allowed. 
thalception by the Court; and the Court ſeem'd 
han de of Opinion, That it had been ill on a 
=_ 1 1 : 4 
nd it is note at the Defence is ven 
fend? vim C injur quando, & c. but nothing - ergy 225 
4 ſaid to that. 


lea, 
Van 
e he 
Tha 


- ps 
To 


Rr The 


93 


* 
r 
. q : \ - r r 


Juſtification S to the Cattle, the Defendant juſtifies ſoſ 
— N Damage. Feſant in a Paſture, of whic 
m 


614, TRESPASS. 


fl. The Aon was, Treſpaſs for taking aw 
his Cattle, and lopping his Trees. 


want of Ad. he was po efled, called the Upper - Mark 

Jiein, | Baulk, &c. And as to the Reſidue he pleads 

That at Af. are ſeveral Cloſes called Ley 

Ground, but none of them known withou 

other Additions ; and that the Cloſe in quo ur 

called Garlicks Ley of Ground, and the Deſen 

dants Freehold, and fo juſtifies. Plaintiffs d 

murs eſpecially, Ft pro Cauſis eo qa* placita il 

ſunt incerta duplicia 2 tendunt ad General Exit 

Et _ forma, cc. Defendant joins wt ind 

. Firſt, It was excepted, That the Plea, % 

xception 1. 2 bl 3. 

— — Def poſſeſſimat” fuit, & c. was ill, and fo 

vat fuit, was ruled, it being in Bar, tho' the Defend: 
Cited ſeveral Caſes for it. 

2. An Exception was taken, That thin. 

Double Plea. Plea as to the Treſpaſs in the Ley of Ground wiÞucl 

double; but the farmer Part was ſaid to be oe 

ly introductory to the Subſtance, to reducet 

Place to a preciſe Certainty. 

Judgment pro» 3. It was excepted, That the ſaid laſt Pl 

Ser", he firſt amounted to the General Iſſue, and ſome A 

5 vewg ſwers was made thereto; but in regard t 

mw firſt Plea was ill, Judgment upon the Demi 

rer was given for the Plaintiff upon the whUH 

for the Plea being bad in Part, was bee 

in the Whole; and aſter a Writ of Inquiry ed 

cuted, and Damage given, it was moved Yup! 

Arreſt of Judgment, that the Declaration u ſen 

ill, being Quare cepit quatuor pullos, withofſ 401 

an Anglice, as 1 Siderf. 60, Stiles 31. Sed the 

alccatur, for the Deſendam having A Tr 

l tal; 


TRESPASS. 615 


king of them, they were well known to him, 

ad therefore he had made the Declaration 

ood, and the Plaintiff had Judgment. Vide 

Int. 1489, 1492. Pell verſ. Garlick, & vide 

hot Demur 219, 220. 

Bar al Treſpaſs, That the Plaintiff had Forfeiture by 
rteiced his Tenancy by Curteſy in Gavel. Tenant by 
Wind, for that he had intermarried with a ſe- Curly 

nd Wife, Af, Ent. 5 1 6. 


wa 


Bar in TRESPASS. 


s de lor by Statute of Limitations pleaded in Treſpaſs. 


| © ſh was brought in C. B. for taking Bar. 
and deraining his Cattle, quouſque finem 
Wii. The Defendant pleads, Cd Cauſa Adlio- Repr. 
11 non accrevit infra ſex Annos ante impetration' 
Brevis, The Plaintiff replies, That he had 
before brought an Original in Battery in Lon. 
m, and Outlawry thereon; and that within 
uch a Time after the Ouclawry was reverſed Demurret 
he declared here. Defendant after Oyer of the cm Cauſis. 
Original demurs, and for Cauſes, Eo d non 
wnſtat in placito illo quo die breve Original ſuper 
modo narrat, impetrat' fuit, nec quo die Utla- 
garia predict ver predict T. H. fuit reverſat ac 
ra ſpacium unius Anni ante impet rac brevis ori. 
Zinal ult ment ionat vel non Q4'q; placitum ill eff 
ncertum vit ioſum & defectiuum & caret forma, 
oc. Vide Lev. Ent, 204. 205. And fee the 
d of Lev. Rep. 245. where it's ſaid, That Obj. That 
upon the Argument it was inſiſted for the De- the Action 
ſendant, That the Original being laid in Lon- being laid in 
don, he could not in this Action declare in ano- L. he could 


| . -  - not declare in 
ther County, altho' the Cauſe of Action is Poe 


Irranſiory; but upon the Prothonotary's In- County, 34 
3 Rr 4 formation, nen #llecatur. 


616 TRESPASS. 


formation, that the Courſe of the Court i hi 
That altho the Original was laid in London for tt 
Expedition of the Qutlawry, yet when then at 
Defendant comes in, the Plaintiff may declare hi 
againſt him in any other County, be the 1 
Action Local or Tranſitory: And the Stall E 
21 Jac. 16. gives the Plaintiff a general Power h 
to commence a new Suit after the Outlawryſ a! 
revers d; ſo he might do here to warrant b ta 
Declaration within the Courſe of the Coun le 
And Judgment was given for the Plaintiff. ih 

Vide poſtea: De Impriſonment per Proceſs. d: 


if. Defendant pleads non Cul, as to Part; ,, 
and as to the Reſidue, he pleads a Jud WY 2 
ment for the Defendant againſt the Plain. c 
tiff in another Action for the ſame Tre. th 
paſs, with Averment of the Identity, and v 
the Plaintiff's Demurrer thereto. 


E qd' predict W. non de novo aligns fe 
L œvit aliquem locum in certo in quo trans 
predict unde ipſe ſuperius fe modo quetitut i I 
* fa” fuiĩt, nec directe allegavit eandem trans th 
* fteri in dicto loco in Cor Barra ipſius G. pte. C 
To this Plea dictꝰ' ſpecificat' : Et Defendant join d in tba be 
the Plaintiff © Demurrer, and that Fudgment was againſt tie 0: 
demur'd. 6 Plaintiff, and that the Defendant ſhould baw re 
© Cofts according to the Statute, prout per Re- m 
cord, &c. with Averment of the Identity of tht 
© Cauſe of Action. To this the Plaintiff demurs i m 
* and Defendant joins in Demurrer. * 


Wherefore Nore, That in the firſt Action, which was for fa 
the Plaintiff divers Treſpaſſes in his Cloſe and Houſe, tofff th 


demurr'd in 


| which the Defendant pleaded in Bar, Son he 
C6 ' The Pan 
15 


TRESPASS. 617 1 


is. his RepP ſaid, it was his Freehold, and averr'd 
for the greateſt part of his Count, but not all; 1 
hell and travers'd, that it was the Defendant's Free- 
ar hold, and Defendant demurr'd, as above: ] 
The Defendant's Councel inſiſted upon two i 
Exceptions. (1.) That the Plaintiff ought to Exception 

have concluded his Replication ad Patriam, taken in the 
and not with a Traverſe ; for his Rep? con- firſt Action. 
tain'd no new Aſſignment, for that always al- 


ledges, that the Place mentioned in it is other pe pers. 1 
than in the Bar; but he agreed with the Defen- q 
dant, That the Place alledged in the Bar is } 
the true Place where the Treſpaſs was done, and 9 


which was in Controverſy between them; and 
then the Bar is not to be taken as a common 
and fictitious Bar, but as a real Bar; and ac- 
cording thereto the Parties ought to demean 
rel themſelves in Pleading, and ſo the Replication 
aal with a Traverſe as is here is ill, for he ought to 
have concluded, That ic was his Freehold, 
and not the Freehold of the Defendant, Et hoc 
na- per d' inquiratur per Priam'. 
an Alſo another Exception was taken, wiz. Omiſſion in 
iu That in the Replication before the Traverſe, the firſt Addi 
ans the Treſpaſs in taking and carrying away one n. 
pte. Cart-Load of Poſts is omitted, and that was 
that held to be an incurable Fault; and the Defen- 
the dane in that Action had judgment, for by 
zar reafon of that Omiſſion the Plaintiff had nor 
Re- ¶ maintain'd his whole Declaration. 


— — 


— 


n — — 
— „ 5 — — 2 
9 N . D 72 8 28 | > 

. * oy » — * 


the In this laſt Caſe, where the former Judg- It ſeems A 
aur ment is pleaded in Bar, the Reporter obſerves, Judgment | 
That no Judgment is entred on the Roll, nor $12.94, n 4 


any Rule to be found for Judgment; yet, as 2 AQi- 


s ſor far as he could apprehend, the Opinion of ; 
, toil the Court was with the Defendant, and that nl 
Senf he was well aſſur'd the Opinion of Juſtice i 
F ia Powell was ſo; for upon one of the Arguments ul 

+. 


618 


TRESPASS. 


he declared his Opinion to be fo, Yide2 Lu. 
1420. ] 


Commons, &c. pleaded. 


Ide Winch, En. 961, Cc. Thompf. En. 398, L 
386, 387, 322, 248, 305. Bro. Red, 
490. per Releaſe, Win. En. 1005. 2 Browne i 4 
145, 151. per Arbitrement, Bro. Vad. 428, - 


453. Thomp. 376. a 
p, 
Tender of Amends pleaded. ; 


Bir by invo- C. 1 Treſpaſs, ſor moving and carrying 


luntaty Treſ- 


away his Hay, Defendant pleads non 


paſs, and ten- CyP as to Part; and as to the Reſidue he dif- 


der of A- 
mends. 


Judic' pro 
Quer* ſur 
Demur'. 


and that he is ſeized of a Parcel of Land near 


the Plaintiff's, and thro? Miſtake mowed ſome 
of the Plaintiff's Land, thinking it had been 
his own, which he only intended to mow, and 
ſo involuntary Treſpaſs z and that before the If 
Action brought he tendred 2 -. in Amends, 
and wncore priſt, which 2 5. was ample dvatis- 50 
faction. Plaintiff demurs, and the Defendant 90 
joins in Demurrer, and Judgment for tie g. 
Plaintiff; for it appears that the Fact was vo- 
luntary, and his Intents are not traverſable, 
neither can they be known. Fide Lev. En. 
178. 83 Lev, Rep. 37. | 
Vide i Brown. 341, 332, Oc. 2 Bro. 258, 278. 
Bro. Vad. 513. Tbompſ. 204, 360, 409. Much 


En. 995. J. 
Licence pleaded in Treſpaſs. * 


Ide x Bro. 353. 2 Brown. 259, 283. Brito 
Vad. 408. Clerk's Aſſiſt. 88. Thom or 


223, 337, 349, 356, 365, 387, 296, 40 py 
Rob. En. 465. BaY © 


[4 
* 
claims Title to the Premiſſes of the Plaintiff,  : 
[ 
U 
c 


d 


TRESPASS : - ay 
Bar in Treſpaſs, De Batterie, & Sor Af 


ſault Demeſne, G. moliter manus impoſuit. 


Ide Bro. Red. 482, 485. 2 _— £37; 

138, 143, 144, 145, 260. Bro, Vad. 413, 

| 442, 1 48 *i Bro, Method, Now. 
| 384. 2 Mod. Intr. 313. Placita Gen, 625, 633. 


Rob. 464. Tho mp. 390; 408, 385, 333, 394, 
335» 336, 326, 370, 397, 421, 422, 300, 
324, Ce. 


L * Qd' Def? ſuit un' Guardian' Eccletie Bar by a 
3 Bl © paroch' de W. Et Quer? inhabitans infra ean- Chureh- 
paroc EY Warden for 
„dem qui tee Divini Servicii die Dominico toking off a 
. © habuir gale rum ſuper Capite, & illud recu- Man's Hat in 
if, Ml « favic detegere, per quod Def? cepit galerum the Church. 
* Quer' a Capite ſuo, & ill' ei delibecavit, Fe 
Nc Y © travers' qd? eft Cul' die in narr', &c. Quer 
MY © moratur. Vide 1 Saun, 10 & 12. Tho' 
nd upon the Demurrer it was alledged, that he 
the had traverſed the Day where it was not mate. 
ds, rial, and that he had not juſtified any Batter); 
tts. yer the Court looking upon it as a great Mil. 
lac demeanor in the Plaintiff, gave Judgment a- 
the gainſt the Plaintiff, without any Regard to 
'l-Y the Objections. Vide poſtea Impriſonment. 


Al 


— Vide poſtea pur Miſdemeanor. 
ut, 

, Bar by a Sheriff of a City for Aſſault and 
1210 Battery. 


V. Reſpaſs * ſſault, Batterie, and falſe 5 Aſſault 
| Impriſonment: The Defendant as to Dem ſue as 
the Batterie pleads, Son Aſſault Demeſne ; and as to the Batte- 


Brito the Impriſonment juſtifies ſpecially, as being PA = 1 


20 one of the Sheriffs of the City of Coventry, Impriſon- 
40 guarding the Gaol and Priſoners, Cc. and the ment. 


Day * Plaintiff 


620 TRESPASS. 


Plaintiff came there and ſtruck him, per quod 

he impriſoned the Plaintiff, Cc. Et hoc, Unde, 

&c. And becauſe the Defendant had ſaid no. 

Quer'demur'. thing tothe /7 &- Armis, the Plaintiff demurr'd 

to both his ſpecial Pleas 3 but upon the Argu- 

Vi & Armis Ment it was ſaid, That the Ji & Armis is only 

enly Matter of Matter of Form, and aided by Stat. 27 Elix. F. 

Ferm. of General Demurrers, becauſe it appears in 

7 H. 6. 13. & 1 H. 7. 19. That if a Defen- 

dant be acquitted of a ſpecial Matter, the /; 

 & Armis ſhall not be tried, altho' the Defen. 

dant had taken Iſſue thereupon ; but he ihall be 

fined, and a Capiatur awarded againit him, 

Quer nil ca- G. Therefore Judgment was here given, 

„ —4 nil capiat per Billam, Vide 1 Saund, 76, 
| 81, &c. 

as. . Vide 2 Lut. 1435, Cc. Narr' pur Aſſault, 

I Ce. al H. Bar al Vulnerac non Cul, ad reſid 

— ** juſtificat en Defence de Son Poſſeſſion, en un Cloſe 

i in C. en meſme County, into which the Plain- 

tiff entred with a Cart and Horſes; with a 

Traverſe, that he is CuP at H. or out of the 

„. ſaid Cloſe. Rep!, That his the Plaintiff's 

Way. Entry was in per & trans quandam viam in eo. 

dem clo ex permiſſione uſitat & gavis , and 

thereupon the Defendant with Violence aſ- 

ſaulted him, Abſq; hoc qd' moliter manus impoſuit, 

Demur cum Ge. Defendant demurs with Cauſes, vis. Eo 

Cauſis. d placitum five Rep eft duplex ſive triplex in 

Juſt ificando (licet inſufficienter) intrationem ipſius 

G. in Clauſum ipſius J. predict necnon in aſſignand 

al inſult & verberatiun qu idem J. ſuperius 

allegavit, Aceciam traverſanlſsſnſult & verbera- 

tion il per ipſum I. ſuperius cogn*, Aceciam eo 


gd" Traverſia predict? eſt omnio ſuperflua & re- 


dundans ac dicta Replicaco eſt incerta & caret 


a forma, 


Judi 


TRESPASS 621 
Judic pro Quer, And reſolved by the Coutt, Ji, pro 
that the Replication was not any Departure 2-7", and 
from the Declaration; for in Tranſitory Acti. That 0s hay 
ons, as for Battery, and taking of Goods, the alledge che 
Plaintiff may alledge the Torr done not only vr in ano- 
in another Vill, but alſo in another County; ther County. 
and the Place may not be travers'd without 
ſpecial Cauſe of Juſtification, which extends 
to ſome certain Place, as by a Conſtable, ec. 
so if a Man be beaten in the County of Mid. 
\ WE ſex, and he brings his Action in the County 
of Bucks, the Defendant may not plead that 
che Plaintiff made the Aſſault upon him in the 
„County of Middleſex, and travers the County 
„of Bucks ; but he muſt plead his Juſtification in 
„che County of Bucks, for that the Cauſe of his 
Juſtification is good in any Place; and ſo it is in 
che Caſe of Bailment of Goods, and other 
Caſes for Tranſitory Things. And it is an 
I ancient Principle in the Law, That for Tranſi. 
- Wtory Cauſes of Action, the Plaintiff may al- 
l — the Fact in what Place or County he 
a leales, ec. Id. 1437, 1438. 
AY | . Narr' for 2 a his Servants and Defendants 
u. I Horſes. Bar, That the Mayor, &c. of B. Juſtify as _ | 
d were: poſſeſſed of an Acre of Land, called the — 
Key ; and that the ſaid Servants would, and 
endeavoured to unload the ſaid Horſes, (being 
loaded with Soap-Aſhes) upon the ſaid Acre, 
fer que, they as Servants of the Mayor, Cc. 
nd fo juſtify. The Plaintiff demurr'd, and 
1d ook ſeveral Exceptions: 1. That the Juſtifi- 
cation is as Servants to 2 Corporation, and 
therefore ought to fhew an Authority under 
their Seal, Sed non allocatur, 2. That it does 
Kt appear that the Defendant's Servants, &c. 
were ever upon the Acre, but is only faid Q 
voluiſſent & conabantur exon are, &c. And this 
di 8 55 


622 TR E 5 5 A 8 8. 

was allow'd to be a good Exception by the | © 

But Judg- Court. 3. It was excepted, That the per qed U 

ment pro Ser vicium amiſit was not anſwered ; and by 

| Auer, th? Juſtice Powel, an Action lies for the Mayor, = © 
| = 4 if ſo be he did not loſe the Service of his Ser. ll © 
f eing vant; and for that the proper Plea in ſuch I c 
Caſe is non Cul”, which was not denied; and ll ® 

the Plaintiff had Judgment, Vide 2 Luz. 1496, ll 

& 1497. 

No Exception It is there noted, That no Exception was N 
was, tho he taken to the Bar; for that it was therein only 
ſhew'd no fajd, That the Mayor, Cc. were poſſeſſed of ſa 
1 — of Pol- the ſaid Acre, wichout ſhewing any Title to I E 
E Fun it; and refers to the Cale of Smith and Bull, ! 
; Mo. 242. and Pell and Garlicks Caſe. 2 Lu," 
1489. where tis ruled to be ill, being in Bar. 1A 

Vide piſtea de Avers, fer 


| Bar per Son Aſſault demeſue; Repl', That YT 
i Defendant endeavoured to beat his I in 
= Maſter's Horſe, Ge. co 


INN for Aſſault, Battery and Wound; . 
ing, Bar per Son Aſſault Demeſne ; Rep, Jul 
I . That he was a Servant to W. S. retain'd to take ¶ De 
4 Care of his Horſes; and that the Plain- Ba 
| tiff, Totis ſuis wiribus conatus fuit verberare & Ar 
if vulnerare equum Magri” ſui, Whereupon he, 36. 
F defend the Horſe, laid his Hands upon the De. not 
tendant, and theteapon he aſſaulted the Plain I lis 

tiff, prout in Narr. ma! 

Rejo', That one P. another Servant of thedan 

' Rep. That faid V. S. came to make a Treſpaſs in theſſ” 
Plaintiffcame Cloſe of one N. R. the Defendant's Maſter, Th 
to aſſiſt ano- and the Defendant endeavoured to hinderÞ-al 
_ Sn him; and thereupon the Plaintiff came ang 
P"* aſſaulted him the Defendant; and traverſes 


that be is guilty of the Treſpaſſes new aflign'd'va 
buy. 


TRESPASS. 4% 
but only in the ſaid Cloſe. Plaintift demurs; 
upon the Argument, no Regard was had to . 
Jſche Rejoinder, neither did the Defendant's 

Councel inſiſt upon it; but he took an Ex- 
eeption to the Rep, That it was only, that 
\ I the Defendant, (Totis ſuis viribus conatus fuit $ 
q verberare & vun are equum Magiſtri ſui) of 
- © which he took Care, and to defend the Horſe 
he laid his Hands upon the Detendant, &c. Judic' pro 
Which was not ſufficient, for he ought to have D, for pot 
ly MY aledged in Fact, That the Defendant had al- 2 
a faulted and beat the Horſe before he laid his bear che 
to Hands upon the Defendant ; and this is pro- Horſe before, 
ed by the Common-Plea of Son Aſſault, in which oc. 

4. it is always alledged that the Plaintiff made an 

Aſſault upon him, beſore he ſays that he de- 

ſended him, Cc. The Plaintiff's Councel 

cited Raſt. 612. Pl. x1 & 15. & 668. Pl. 4. 
at That the Replication was good notwithſtand- 
his ing that Objection; but the Court was of a 

contrary Opinion, and the Defendant had 

judgment. Vide 2 Lut. 148, & 1483. 
ad: It is noted, that it was faid in the Cale by Thy a Ser- 
el, Juſtice Powell, That a Servant may juſtify in vant may ju- 
take Defence of his Maſter, but he cannot juſtify a ſtiſy in De. 
ain Battery in Defence of his Maſter's Goods. ſence ——_ 
end in Jones and Treſilian's Cafe, 1 Mod. Rep — 


may not ju- 


„ to J36. tis ſaid by F. Twiſden, That one may ſtify in Be- 

De. ¶ not juſtify the beating of another in Defence of fence of his 

lain: Nis Poſſeſſion, but he may ſay, Qd' molliter Goods, Oe. 
manus impoſuit; & per Keeling, That the Defen- 

F thelldant in the Caſe ought to lay, C molliter ma- 

theilt impoſuit, que eff eadem, & c. und for. theſe 

aſter, Things, vide Owen's Rep, 93, 94. Ireland's 

indelCaſe, & 2 Inſt. 3 16. where tis ſaid, That one 

andlmay juſtify an Aſſault and Battery in the De- 

erſeslſence, or for the Preſervation of his Poſſeſ- 

ign d lion of Lands or Goods; but he may not juſti- 


buy. ty 


ST iS 
8 r CY TA DI INT 1 — AT, ka, ot el 


TRESPASS. 


ſy the Maiming, Wounding, or Threatning 
of Life or Member; and ſo (as that Book 
f ſays) Nota un Diverſity enter le Defence de Son 
| Perſon, & le Defence de Son Poſſeſſion, ou de ſes bien. 


[ Bar de Impriſonment per Proceſs. 
1 V. Reſpaſs for Battery and falſe Impriſon. 
e 


murrer, co Defendant juſtifies by a Writ ſued out of B. R. 

put Variety Com Midd', and to the Sheriff of Devon; and 

— 1 a Warrant and Arreſt thereupon at D. and 
8 traverſes all other Places and Times; Rep!” & 

injuria abſq; tali cauſa. The Defendant demun . 

and Judgment for him; for it is ill upon a Ge Il 

neral Demurrer to put Matter of Record ander 

Fact, and Variety of Matters, in one Iſſue, . 

the Warrant, Arreſt, &c. according to Croga 

Caſe, Co. 8. Alſo in the Concluſion, the Word" © 

Et hoc pet? qd inquiratur per Priam are omitted! © 

for the Replication in ſuch Caſe ought to mak? © 

the Iſſue of it ſelf. Vide 3 Lev. Rep. 61, 65, Nr 

The Plaintiff declares upon an Aſſault, Bat"! 

Bar by a tery, Wounding and Impriſonment. Bar ast he 

Judgment, & Vi & Armis non Cul', Et quoad reſid, That th nd 

Co" jo, Defendant recovered a 3 in Caſe . 

thereon. the Common Pleas againſt the Plrintiff for Dea 

mages, © Unde pros eſt Ca' fa? direct' Vic Men 

© Quimandavit Ballivo Lib'tar” Ducat' Lanc, Mug 

© ipſevirtute mandat” ad requiſition' Det? ce ep 

© quer* & ipſum detinuit in cuſtodia pro dam all 


© nis quouſq; ſolvit denar” Ballivo ad uſum De 5 


Rep!', That 


© & travers qd” eft Cul ante emanation* bi 
— © vis & — inde. Repl' qd' Def e 
© Attorn' de Coi' Banco & intravit Judiciu 
vers Quer' ubi revera nullum Judicium 
© trari debuiſſet, Et ſuper inde Def* de inj 
© ſua propr* impriſonavit Quer', Et poſtea i 
I „ tral 


4-7 
2 * 3 i 8 — 2 2 = \ 4 
3 I», * 4. 33 . « N OI be == 


hs — IS N 
n „„ 
F . n r 7 
- ES. N - AY WP. e C 8 = i I - 

. AY" 1 ond 00> rr \ l E 3), - 

7 — p 2 2 82 ISS. AS oo * SS « \ EXT g [2 Y P —— = Ys E e — 2 

8 FLY 2 >” — \ J "V 1 05, * — Lan ITY q © 4 722 N F TY . f uy l 

OS I Boe, Intranet woes ASSETS oo oo mens ab ogy "REAL Es vB wx 7 . 2 1 ei — : s JE F ON _— 
— Se. A : l p< - 2 * =D * _— * 3 r 5 N T — 1 Fr . 
U 2 — ——— . * . 2 — 9 * Cas 8 .- 2 "Th 
— * —— * „ 0 K — pr „ _— — — — —— * 5 * 2 
2 F = e 
* 


TRESPASS Of 
ac Judicii habita per Cur adjudicat” fuit Rejo. Of the 
kf Yacua, Rejo per Maintenange de Bar, Et Entry by 
„aulterius qd? per negligenc' Clerici Judicium ry wy 
. intrat' fuit irregulariter & evacuat' per Cur” & 

travers ꝗd' fuit fraudulent', Quer' morat' in 
Lege. Vide 2 Ven. 190, 


vid I Trans G. Irpri ſoument' quoiſg; Finem 


fecit. 
4 XIArr. for Aſſault and Impriſonment, Bar, and jo⸗ 


4 Quouſq; Finem, $4.5. 4 d. Solvit, brought ſtifies by an 

ainſt che Plaintiff, Officer and Gaoler, in 5 

laferior Court; Bar by Non Cut to all ex- from an infec. 

ept the Aſſault, Impriſonment and Dereiner, r Court. 

itil he paid the 54 5. 4 4. and for thoſe juſti- | 

mm by Proceſs of Ex<cution upon- a Judgment 

{MW the Court of Record of St. B. in the Coun- 

ted of G. beld by Preſcription from three Weeks 

nal! three Weeks, before the Conſtable there, 

” br bis Deputy, and two Suitors. To which the 

Bf aintiff demurs, and Judgment was given for 4 

aste Plaintiff upon ſeveral Defaults in the Plea | 
End eſpecially becauſe. the Record was with a | 

ſe i Taliter Proceſſum fujt , without ſhewing any Ap- Sed Judic? 

Dearance of the-Defendant, or any Declara: pro Quer' 

on ; alſo, becauſe it is alledged, That the Court = _ 

wpht to be held before the Conſtable, or his?“ . 

Deputy, and two Suitors; and afterwards it 

alledged, That the Court was held before 


ic 


& 


IC * 
cep 


* he Deputy and two Suitors, Et diverſis aliis 
> b@#@toribus, Vide 2 Lut. 913, 918. 

. 

diciu 

um 1 7 „ „„ 
L. $f Single 


* tral 


WI; es Re . 82 
des 1 4 yon — av. 
» „ 1 ah A N e 8 pe — _ © _ 
— : — n „ A * ah 


Execution 


EE ” A a 1 * n 2 * — & 
2. ˙ EIS 
4 5 * # 


626 


TRESPASS. 


. Smile in Trans & Impriſonment' quouſque, 


Bar. 


Demur”. 
Exceptions to 
both Bars. 


Authoritics 


Gc. 1. Bar by Warrant upon a Writ 
of Privilege. 2. By a Cap Dtl. 


ſ. Ide 2 Lui. 919, &c. Trans for Aſſault, 
Battery and Impriſonment, Al dex 

jours, and detaining him upon the laſt until he 
paid the Defendant a Fine of 10 J. The Defen- 
dant juſtifies the firſt Aſſault, & c. by a War. 
rant upon a Writ of Privilege, and Juſtifica. 
tion of the 2d by two of the Defendants, by 
a Cap U, Oc. To which the Plaintiff de. 
nrr'd. 

Upon the firſt Argument of this Demurrer, 
4 Jac. 2. an Exception was taken to both the 
Pleas of the Defendants, vis. That there is 
not any particular Anſwer to the detaining the 
Plaintiff in Priſon until he paid a Fine of 
10 J. to the Defendants. Another Excepti- 
on was taken to the laſt Plea of the Outlawry, 
viz, which is pleaded, That the Capias Ut! 
iſſued againſt the ſaid F. F. whereas his Name 
is George; but no Authorities were cited as to 
either Point, nor does it appear that it was 
argued again: But the Reporter, Fol. 924. 
Cites ſeveral Caſes to both Points, vis. To 
the firſt, 3 H. 4. 8, & 9. & 19 H. 6. 35. 
35 H. 6. 44, & 45. 2 Mod. Rep. 194 & 199, 
& 2 Ven. 93. Bealy and Sampſon's Caſe. 

- And as to the laſt, vide Savil 71. & 1 Sid, 
135. Fanſbaw and Mild may's Caſe. 


Patrick 


| : * 
** » * , - 9 a * ® | 
” —AE >. ; * I 
* 1 = * 
R ESP A Ss. 627 | 
3 


0 patrick vers: Johnſon ; Count for Aſſault, 
Battery, Wounding and Impriſonment, 


againſt four. 


5 . ſ. B* R per un, viv. The Plaintiff in the Bar by hit 
be! Inſerior Court, Quoad V. ulneracon non that was the 
on. Cu, Et quoad reſid, juitify per un Coe upon —_ in 
ar. 2 Judgment recovered by him againſt the De. AE 
Wt ſendant in the Court of the Burrough of St. Ed. n 


dy vendtbur, in Debt upon a Bond, That he de- 

vered it to two of the other Defendants in 
forma Furis exequend*, and that they at his Re- 
queſt, molliter manus impoſuer upon the Plain- 
the fit to arreſt him, Er ea de Cauſa did arreſt 
and impriſon him, Que ſunt eadem, ec. Rept Rif, no 

after Oyer of the Ca ſa, (which was above a L/, Fei 
the Y | . © ſued out, and 
ear) that no Judgment upon a Scire Facias Pefendant 
upon the ſaid Judgment was given, nor was demurs. 
there any Continuance thereof, &c. Defen- 
I dants demur, and the Plaintiff joins in the De- 
mur rer. ; 

The principal Exception to the Plea in this pyception 
Caſe was, That the Juſtification of the Arreſt againſt IU 
by a Molliter manus impoſuer”, was no Juſtifica- der manus im. 
Toon of the Battery; and the Caſe of Stoney poſuer'. 
and Calvert was cited, which upon a Demur- 
rer was adjudged by the whole Court accord- 
ngly. Id. 2 Lut. 929. And the Reporter 
5% Ithere obſerves, That this fame Caſe is report- 

ed in the 3 Levinx 403. where tis faid, That 

the Court enclined to be of Opinion, that it 

was a good Exception, but with a Quod miror- 

by that Reporter, who ſays, that all Juſtifica- 

tions in ſuch Caſes are as the Caſe is here; 

ick Nd thatthe Impoſition of Hands is a Battery, 
If they had not a Warrant to excuſe them, 
8 2 Me; 


. 


Tt ſeems Moel- 
liter manus 
impoſuer 15no 
Plea to the 
Battecy. 


But Judg- 
ment againſt 
the Plaintiff, 
becauſe of a 

Diſcontinu- 
ance. 


Mes bona cum venia, (Come il Semble, ſays Ser- 
jeant Lut.) that Aſſertion ought not to paſs ſo 


currant ; for there are many Precedents in 


which Non Cul is pleaded to the: Battery, and 
a Juſtification to the Aſſault and Impriſon- 
ment, as Co. Ex. 303. b. Thomp/. 316, Brown's 
Ent. 1ſt Part 237, 238. 2d Part 134, 145, 
146. Hern 489. Brownl. Rediviv. 477, 478, 
Afton 369, & 2 Cro. 261, Candiſh:s Caſe; 
and refers to 2 E. 4 6. & 3 Cra. 93, 94. 


where in an Action of Aſſault, Battery and 


Wounding, the Defendants juſtified by a gentle 
laying their Hands upon the Plaintiff, and 
Coke took an Exception, That the Battery and 
Wounding were not anſwered; and the Court 
declared, that for that Cauſe the Plea was ap- 
parently vitious; and 2 Ven. 193. there was 
the like Juſtification as in the Cale in Queſti- 
on ; and the Book ſays, Jndgment was given 
for the Plaintiff for an apparent Fault in the 
Plea, which was, That he had not pleaded to 
the Battery. That chis Point: was not deter- 
min'd in this Caſe of Patrick and Fohnſon, but 
that the fole Ground of the Judgment was the 
Diſcontinuance inthe Cafe, which was obſerv'd 
by the Court; and upon which they pro- 
nounced Judgment againſt the Plaintiff againſt 
his Will; altho' the other Reporter ſays, That 
the Plaintiff being ſatisfied the Exceptions 
would not aid him diſcontinued : But Serjeant 
Lut. allows there are many Precedents of 
Pleading as in this, Cafe, as 21 H. 7. 21. 
where Chief Juſtice Rede ſays, If a Conſtable 
inan Action of Aſſault and Battery pleads, 
That he for good Cauſe put his Hands upon 
the Plaintiff to arreſt him, Que eſt eadem, Cc. 


That it is a good Juſtification af the Aſſault- 
and Battery ; whereupon King ſmill (aid, Sup- 


poſe 


P 
J. 
h 
ſ: 
tl 
$ 
I 


6 — % > 3©A> 0 ˙¼˙•—— A. Con 


1 ao oO ae . as ca _ Yo 


poſe the Plaintiff will reply, That aſter the 
laying on his Hands the Defendant did beat 
him the Plaintiff Rede; then the Plaintiff may 
ſay, That che Plaintiff aſſaulted him, and fo 
the Damage Fit de ſon Aſſault Demeſne, & c. 
Sed in tanta wvarietate Opinionum quare meliorem, 
ſays our Reporter, Vide 2 Lut. 925, Cc. 
Patrick ver: Fobnſon. | 
ff. See 2 Lut. 930, &c. In Aſſault, Bat- Smile againſt 
tery and Impriſonment, againſt four, two of four, and 
the Defendants plead Non CuP, the third juſti- Juſtification 
hes the Aſſault, Battery and Impriſonment, un- by c e. 
til they delivered him to the other Defendant, 
the Gaoler, by Vertue of a Ca [a upon a Judg- 
ment in an Inferior Court; the Gaoler juſtifies 
the Aſſault, Impriſonment, & Deteiner, until 
the Plaintiff was deliver'd by Habeas Corpus, 
and Non Cu?” to the Battery. | 
. 1dem 932. Juftification by a Bailiff of the Bar by a Bai- 
Sheriff of the County Palatine of Cheſter, by a liff of a 
Cd ſa upon a Nonſuit in the Exchequer, for SnnU Pale. 
Coſts directed to the Chamberlain there, an 
another Ca ſ under the Seal of the Coun. 
ty Palatine directed to the Sheriff there, and 
a Warrant made by him- to the Defendant ; 
and this Plea it's ſaid ſeem'd to be repugnant 
in it ſelf, for the Defendants had pleaded Non 
Cul? to any Aſſault, and yet they juſtify the 
taking by Impriſonment of the Plaintiff. 14. 934. 
. Tdem 935. in Sccio, Defendants, vix. 


judge, Officer and Party Plaintiff, juſtify the Juſtification 


Aſſault Verberat ion & Maletractation ac Impriſo- 5 Officers 
nament, in an Inferior Court in Debt brought — 
by the then Plaintiff as Adminiſtrator. The & Dimmu 4 
Plaintiff replied, The Cauſe of Action accrued and Judg- 
out of Their Juriſdiction 3 and traverſes, that ment againſt 
it accrued within (whereas that was not al- 
ledged in the Bar): The Defendants demurr'd tinent Trz- 


8 3 gene · verſe, 


TRE SPASS. 


generally, and Judgment was given for the by 


Deſendants, for the Traverſe was impertinent, ¶ Jud 


3 3 2 * 21 9 
9 —— l | — * * - — ö 0 "Ik 
"eva — rr 5 


l 
f 72 


V/ kore the 
Party eſca- 


2 6 _— 


Jurjſdittion. 


2 n 
2 — . —— 


— _ 
2 —— 
82 
7 > 1 
* — — 4 
— — 


I'S * 
$ 328 
g * 


ped out of the 


and nothing to the Purpoſe, being of that 
which was not mentioned in the Plea. And 
cho? it's alledged, That the Cauſe of Action 
accrued out of the Juriſdiction, yet it's only by 
way of Inducement ro the Traverſe ; and it 
was argued for the Defendants, that an Action 
of Treſpaſs lay not, unleſs he had averr', 
That the Defendants had Notice that the Cauk 
of Action did ariſe. out of the Juriſdiction of 
the Court, and that the Plea of the Deſen- 
dants was good to the common Intent; for 
an Action is enter'd, and Proceſs awarded, 
executed and retorn'd, and therefore Prins 
facie is a good Juſtification, without averring, 
that the ®auſe of Action did ariſe within the 
Juriſdiction. It was alſo ſaid, That in an Ai. 
on to be brought in an Inferior Court, it ought 
to be ſhewn, that the Matter did ariſe within 
the Juriſdiction; but otherwiſe, in a Plea to an 
Action of Treſpaſs there, nothing ſhall be in- 
tended to be out of their Juriſdiction, but 
that the Proceedings were regular; And iſit 
had appeared in this Caſe by the Entry of the 
Action, that the Cauſe did ariſe out of the Ju. 
11{diction, then it would be Reaſon: that af 
Action ſhould lie, but not in this Caſe ; and 
many Authorities are there Cited and referr'd 
„ | 
. See a Juſtification of Aſſault and Impri- 
ſonment by Vertue of Proceſs out of an Inſe- 
rior Court, where the Plaintiff eſcaped to 4 
Place out of the Juriſdiction of the Inferior 
Court, and is retaken by freſh Purſuit. 14, 
938, ec. 85 | 1 4 
ff. Them 945. Jultificacion of an Aſſault, Bat- 
e2ry and Imptiſonment, ec. of the Plaintill 


© * 


674 


reſt 
ſurt 
the 
£ 


0 ; 
TRESPASS ns 
by a Ca ſa to the Sheriff of Hereford upon a Juſtification, 
judgment in C. B. where the Plaintiff was ar- for that the 
reſted in a Town in Com? H. which Town was 3 
ſurrounded with the County of Salop; and reliſted, Sc. 
therefore they brought him towards C. in Com. 
g. being the direct Way to the Gaol of H. and 
he reſiſted, and they were compell'd to uſe 
Force; and the Plaintiff being brought to C. 
deſired he might there ſpeak with his Adver- 
ſary concerning the ſaid Debt; and then the 
Plaintiff gave him Security for his Debt, and 
thereupon he was let at large, Que ſunt eadem, 
Oc. with two ſeveral Traverſes before the 
Warrant, or after the Diſcharge, Cc. Idem 
943. The Reporter makes a Quzre of theſe 
Traverſes by reafon of the Averment, and re- 
ſers to ſeveral Caſes there mentioned; and to 
the Caſe of Hargrave and Ward, 2 Lut. 1452. 
where it was held ill upon a a ſpecial Demur- 
ter to the Traverſe, 

I. Count for an Aſſault, Sc. by the De. That one of 
ſendants, Simulcum F. B. Bar, That the the Defen- 
Treſpaſs, &c. was gommitted by them, and dant's paid 
the ſaid JF. B. jointly, and that the Plaintiff the Execu- 
brought an Action in C. B. againſt the ſaid — 
7. B. for the ſaid Treſpaßs, & c. and had Judg.- tiff 's Atto 
ment and Ca' ſa againſt the ſaid B. and that B. ney. 
to avoid being taken in Execution, paid to . D. 
the Plaintiff's Attorney, and by his Aſſent, 
the Money recover'd. Repl' nul til Record”, Rejo Nul tiel Re- 
94 eff, Oc. and pray that the Record may be cord, &c- 
inſpected, Cc. Vide 2 Lut. 944, 945. ; 

The Record being brought into Court, Ee C., 


2 
the Plaintiff's Councel alledged, That there ara) 


was a Variance between the Record which the Records 


vas pfeaded in Bar, and the Record in the of the Acti- 
now Action; for the Declaration in this Acti- ons, and 


ap | "agen eth Day Want? Aver- 
n is for an Aſſau t, Oc made the 5 D y ment of Iden- 


. 5 1 p ; D, >. 
| of May, 9 V. 3. and for detaining him in Pri- tities. 


S 4 4 {on 


632 As 


ſon ſor the ſpace oſ 20 Days; and in the Record 
pleaded in Bar, the Treſpaſs is ſuppoſed the 
14th Day of May, with a Detainer of him in 
Priſon for the ſpace of i» Days only; and the 
Opinion of the Court was, That in regard 
there was not any particular and preciſe Aver. 


ment in the Plea, that the Treſpaſs, &. 
alledged in the Declaration in this Action, 


| and the Treſpaſs in the Action, Cc. pleaded 
in Bar, were the fame Treſpaſs, Cc. that it 
| Was a material Variance; and to ſay as here in 

the now Bar, That Tranſpreſſion? predict“ fac. 


* 1 2 5 ter 
fuer conjundim, Oc. was not of it ſelf ſufficiem ¶ De 
without ſoch Averment as before. Id. 946. ' uc 

Aſſault, Ge. 


n The Plaintiff counts of an Aſſault, Battery 
in partibus and Impriſonment, at Fort St. George, in parti- 
Canſmarins. bus Tranſmarinis, viz, apud London, &c. until 

he had paid a Fine of 200 J. and alſo for ta- 
king ol his Goods, Ge. 5 
Bar per Stat. The Defendants plead in Bar, That the 
de Limitati- Cauſe of Action as to all, except, Cc. did not 
ons. accrue within four Years; and as to 3000 Pago. 


. da's, that the Action did not accrue within (ix 
Rep & De. Years. Rep! to all except the Pagoda's, that 
mu . 


the Plaintiff was ultra Mare, Anglice beyond. 


Sea, Scil!' apud Fort St. George, in Tndiis 
Oriental in partibus Tranſmarinis, videlt' atud Lon- 
don preaiQ' in Paroch & Warda predict, &. And 
as to the Padoga's, that his Action accrued 
within tix Years, Cc. Defendants demur, and 
Plaintifts joins in Demurrer. And it was re- 
ſolved by the whole Court, that the Count 
was ill; for that the Treſpaſs is ſuppoſed to be 
Per Cal, the at Fort St. George, in partibus Tranſmarinis, Vit, 
Couat is re- 14d London, Cc. which is repugnant and ab- 
ſurd. And it was ſaid by the Chief Juſtige, and 
Juſtice Powell, That if a Bond bears Pate at 
Paris, in the Realm of France, tis not triable 
here. 2. That the Proviſo in the Statute of 


Limita- 


pugnant. 


SY . — — 


TRESPASS. 633 
[HH Limitations does not extend by Equity to this 
ol Caſe where the Defendant was beyond. Sea, plaintiff 
nM for the Plaintiff might have ſued out an Origi- might have . 
nal, and continue it for ſo many of the Years ſued out an 9 
25 he pleaſed; and fo is Hall and Mybanl's Caſe, Original, &. 
; Mod. Rep. 311, But Leave was given to dil- 
continue after the Court had pronounced their 
, Opinion in the Caſe. Idem 2 Lutw. 946, 950. 


But fee the late Statute 4 & 5 Ann. ca. 16. 
Nor Amendment of the Law. 


nw , Vide Leu. Ext. 191, Cc. Aſſault, Bat- Bar by an At- 
05 tery and Impriſonment, 13 Juni, 22 Car. 2. tachment 
Defendant pleaded, That 16 Marci an At. out of Chan- 
tachment iſſued out of Chancery to the Sheriff, EY. 
and that the Sheriff, after the Delivery of it to 
him 27 Maii, made a Warrant tothe Defendant : 
Whereupon he took him eodem 27 Maii, and 
traverſes all Time before the Warrant, or aſter 
the Retorn of the Writ. The Plaintiff by 
Rep? maintains his Declaration, Abſque hoc, Rep, That 
100 That the Writ was delivered to the Sheriff be- the Writ was 
go · Wire the Battery and Impriſonment. Defen- not delivered 
"0 , to the Sheriff 

Gant rejoins, That before the Retorn of the pe fore the 
Writ it was delivered to the Sheriff, Scilt“ eo. Battery, Ge. 
nd. Nm 27 Maii, and that before the Arreſt he Rejo”. 

had not Notice but that it was delivered to 
he Sheriff: The Plaintiff ſurrejoin'd, That Surrejo. 
deſore the Arreſt the Wric was not delivered 
o the Sheriff. The Defendant rebuts, as be- Rebutter. 
ore, that he had no Notice but that the 
Writ was delivered to the Sheriff before the 
Arreſt, Et de hoc pon ſe ſuper Priam. Where- 
pon the Plaintiff demurs; and by Pemberton 


be Demurt?*. 
v. Nhief Juſtice, and the whole Court, Judg- 
ab-. nent was given for the Defendant; becauſe, 
and Fest, tie not material if the Writ be delivered 
e at $0 the Sheriff before the Warrant and Arreſt, 
* 0 long as in Truth there is a Writ which 
e © 


warrants 


0 
4 
b 


634 


FRESPASS. 


. 


Thar Bailif warrants the whole. 2. There being a Writ. 


not being 
Privy, nor 
having No- 
tice, &. 


By a Conſta- 
ble. 


Simile. 


Sheriff, 


Bail'ff of a 
Manor. 


and a Warrant upon it, the Bailiff ſhall not be f 
charged for executing of it; for he is not Pri-. 
vy, neither had Notice of the Time of Deli- | 
very of it to the Sheriff; and he had tendred 
an Iſſue of the Notice which the Plaintiff had 
refuſed to accept. Vide 3 Lev. Rep. 93. 

Vide poſtea per Officers ou Proceſs, 


— 


0 mm. £7 c i os 


— 


— 


Bar pur Miſdemeanors, Cc. Vide ante 
Batterie. 


— 


* D' Def” exiſtens Conſtabular? & vi. 
F dens Quer' ſs male geren' & difſtur. 
© ban' pacem poſuit eum in Cippis. 2 Brown, 
© 222, Clerks Aſs. 99. Simile & committebat 
© Quer' cuſtodie. 3 Brownt. 216. Bro, Val 
* 479. Aff. 304. | 
f. Aliter ue Conſtabularius pro inſult” in N, 
eum. Co. Ent. 165. Aſt. 303. Cepit Quer' * 
© Def? ut communem meretricem, Upper 
© Bench Preſ. 209. Ceper' Def? vagran' in 
© nocte, &c. Hern 392. Bro, Vad. 480, Upper 
© Bench Preſ. 208, 211. Decennarius cepit 
Quer' examinand', qui fregit domum i 
© note. Co, Ent. 305. Aſt. zog. 
. © Qd' Vic. cepit & 1mpriſonavit Quer 
© pro Suſpitione Felonie. Raſt. Ent. 34r. de 
. Del' intravit Domum, &c. (fufpicienFilf 
* Quer” retinere retes & canes) Virtute War 
- rant” Juſtic' pacis. Thomp. 359. be! 
F. © Ballivus Manerii cepit Quer', pro equqFſant 
© furat' ſecundum coem' vocem'. . 30 
simile de equo furat' ut Acceſſorium, Id. 30; Ne 
ff. Servus Majoris cepic Quer' Mta comfel! 
* Civit? eo qd' exiſtens Lupanar* luxuriolÞo: 
vixit, &c, Bro. Vad. 479. Thomp. 313. 176 
1 


Re 


Prec 


«A 


it Af. 302. Qd' Lupanar' recepit perſonas Mayor's Ser- 
de ſuſpectuoſas. Vet. Intr. 22 3. Qd' Quer' ſeipm? vant. 
i. malegeſſit erga Majorem exiſten' Juſtic pacis 
i. per quod, &c. 2 Brow». 146. 
ed , © Cepit Quer' per Warrant” Juſtic' pacis juſtices War- 
zd ad ſecuritatem inveniend'. Vet. Intr. 232. rant. 
' Raſt. 241. Upper. Bench Preſ. 206, 219. 
. * Det* cepit Quer', &c. per Mandat' BY Captain's 
Pucis Satellicii. Thomſ. 345. Command. 
. Juſtic' commiſit Quer cuſtod' Def Tz; 
pur Diſſeiſin manuforti. Raf. 341. Vet. 85 RO 
Int. 178. 
Det' ut Magiſter debo' modo caſtigavit Chaſtiſement. 
vi. Quer' ejus Apprentic'. 1 Bro, 219. , 
url J. Qq' Quer' practiſavit Artem Medicine Doctor with. 


un non exiſten' Licenciat'. 8 Co. 110. out Licence. 
bat 

ad Bar de Inſult & Menaces. 

F in Ide Raſt. 613, 647, 662, Let. Intrac. 

ver 160, 161. 

6 

"I 


Per Officers on Proceſs. 


| e the Entry into the Houſe, and Bar per Fi' 


taking the Goods, Defendant pleads fa, & Levari 
fa , the Doors 


Recovery in the Burrough Court of R. and a being wat, 


Precept of Fi“ a; he alſo pleads another 
dgment in the ſame Court againſt the Plain. 
cienFilt upon a Non pro,, and a Precept of Levari 
War. to the Serjeant at Mace directed, per quod, 
he one as Serjeant, and the other as his Affi- 
equſſant, entred, the Doors being open, and 
z01Fade Execution. Rep“, That at the Time of R“, Thar 
30 Te Entry the Doors were locked, and tra- the Doors 
conerles tRat they were open. Rejo', That the Were lock'd. 
irioÞoors were open, and Iſſue. Vide Lev. Ent. 
z. é, Cc. Verdict for the Plaintiff, and entire 
1 | Damages. 


r : 5 


636 
This Judg- 
ment pro 
Quer was 


ſtop'd. 


Juſtification 


by H' fd, 
Cc. 


Rep!' de in- 
jur* ſua 
propr'. 


Judic' pro 


ERESPASS, 


Damages. But wide 2 Lev. 195. where i 
ſaid, That this Judgment was ſtay*d for the 


Incertainty of «1am parcellam penſarum Laniarun, 


Anglice a Quantity of Woollen Yarn. 
J. Vide Lev. Ent. 196. The Defendant, : 
Serjeant at Mace of the City of V juſtiſie, 
taking a Piece of Cloth, by Vertue of. a Pre 
cept from a Covrt of Record, there to make 
Execution by Fieri Facias, &c, As to the Re 
ſidue, pleads a Recovery in the ſaid Court fot 


40 l. at the Suit of one of the Defendants, & 
RepP de injur ſua propr, and traverſeth the Re 


cord twice. Rejo', qd' bet' tale Record'. Vid 
3 Lev. Rep. 243. the Record was brought int 
Court at the Day, which agreed in Subſtance 
but varied in the Day of the judgment given 
and the Queſtion was, Whether he had fail'do 
the Record; but the Court as to that gave nt 


Judgment, but gave Judgment againſt the Delznj 


Quer', for ill dants for other Matters: For (1.) They plea 


Pleading. 


ed the Change of the Name of a Corporation 
and did not ſhew how: (2.) It is not ſhew 
in their Plea, that the Cauſe of Action acem 
ed within the Juriſdiction, and then the Judg 
ment was coram non Fudice, and void; altht 
tis true, that in the Declaration there, ſhew 
in the Plea here, tis ſaid to be within the Ju 
riſdiction; but that is not ſufficient, for iti 
traverſable, and the Matter in the Declaratio 
there is not traverſable here, but only che 
which is alledged in the Plea here: And upo 
theſe Exceptions to the Plea, the Judgment w: 
given for the Plaintiff, Cc. Altho' they agree 
the Replication ill for the double Traverſe 
yet the Declaration being good, the Pleai 
and the Rep'ication not ſhewing thatThe Plat 
tiff had no Cauſe of Action, he ought to ha! 
Judgment, 


1 N 


| 


TRES PASS. 637 
Vie 3 Lev. 109. Defendants plead a Re- Defendanes 
 Worery in C. B. and FE fa Vic & Warrant” juſtify, for 
alwi, qui ceper bone & abduxiſſe voluiſſent, Sed that the 
hi 3 - ; „ Plaintiff 

luer vi & armis reſcuſſiſſe bona conabat, Et Def would have 
liter manus impoſuer ad impediend Geer Oc. reſcued the 
yl” de injuria ſua prop”, Abſq; hoc qd Def in Goods taken, 
xilium Ballivorum &. per eorum precept manus Ce. 
us molliter, &c, Defendant demurs general- 
; and upon the Argument, reſolved by the 
hole Court, 1. That the Replication tra- Per Cur", the 
ring che Command of the Bailiffs was ill; Traverſe in 
* ic he might well do it of his own Accord for the Rep ivill. 
ro Prevent a Reſcue, being a Tort and Breach 
1 the Peace : But, 2. Thar the Defendant's Plea of De- 
en is ill; for the Action js brought of a Bat- fendants ill 
y at D. and the Defendant juſtifies at S. in 
2 lame County, and the Bailiffs have Autho- 
11,8) bro! the whole County; and fo the 
2 uſe of Juſtification in the ſame County not 
nb and therefore he ought to have juſtified 
ww be ſame Place (being in the ſame County) 
con ere the Plaintiff declared: And if the Place Place not 
q been material, he ought to have traverſed material, Ef 
other Places within the ſaid County; where. Zadie, pro 
e Judgment was given for the Plaintiff, * 


% 3 Lev. 113. 


R 1 


fo 


_ . Narr. for taking a Geldiog and a Cow); Defendants 
e Ju ſendants juſtify. by a Fieri Faciaz upon a juſtify by E 


&ment in the County-Court : And hereup- . from the 
judgment was given for the Plaintiff; 2 
Becauſe the Names of the Suitors, before 
om the Conre was held, were not expreſs d: 

For that it was not alledged that any Plaint 
entred, and for that divers Caſes: were 

d: 3. Becauſe a Recovery is pleaded againſt gut Ss 


Husband only, whereas the Action was ment for 


r it! 
ratiol 
7 ha 
upo 


N 


via eht againſt the Husband and Witez and them for ill 
o hat | it is afterwards ſaid, that they both were Pleading. 


convicted, 


Ca 
be 


_ 
' . 
1 ** A 
* n 1 
r 
— — 


—̃ 3 
ee 22 * L 
— . 8 — 1 e Je 
. 6 N 2 — 1 N 


— — 


638 TRESPASS. 
convicted, yet that will not aid the in. ad 
ſufficient Allegation before. Vide 2 Lut. 1351, 7 
1353. 
Pei: ide eund 1369. Narr. for taking of 
P 1 md' 1369. Nar ing of ff" 
— — Goods, Juſtification by a Levari Facias out of oy 
lt. the Hundred Court, Et Demurrer inde, Simil, 10 
1 Brown, 338. Thompſ. 33 3. Winch. Ent. got. na 
By Levari . Narr pro caption & abduct ion un equi, 
out ofa Court &. Bar & Faſtification per Lavari upon a Jude: I 
Baron, but ment in a Court Baron: Demurrer inde; and 


Judgment for it was objected, That it was not alledged before. 


che Plaintiffs yhat Perſons the Court was held, nor that it 


was held in Com? predict, and allowed to be 
good Exceptions; and Judgment for the Plain. 
tiff, 2 Lat. 1524, Cc. An Exception wa. 
taken by the Defendant's Councel; Thatf 
Trover, Converſion, and Treſpaſs, were -joinedf 
together in the Declaration, which might no 
be, Sed non allocatur, for the Allegation of the 
converting the Mare to their Uſes was only 
for Aggravation of Damages. Id. 1526. 
Defendant . Narr* pro caption” & aſport ation” un ſpadm 
juſtifies by Gun eque, ec. Bar Non Cul to all preter captin 
three War. & aſportation', &c. and juſtifies them by the 
—— Scoapung Sheriffs Warrants upon three ſeveral Judgment 
1 in the County Court. Demurrer inde, Several Ex 
ceptions were taken to the Bar, as, 1. It1 
ſaid, That the firſt Plaint was levied at thi 
Court of I. C. nuper Vic, whereas it ought i 
be, Ad Cur” W. C. adtunc Vic“, c. 2. Tha 
the Allegation, That after the Plaints, and be 
But Judg- fore the Judgments, Taliter proceſſum fuit, 0&4 
ment pro was not good in a County Court, and cite 
Auer: for ill 2 Fones 185. Butland wers Mitchell, &. wit 
Rams. ſeveral other Exceptions; and Judgment e 
given for the Plaintiff, but for which of tl 
Exceptions, was not declared by che Coir 
Vide 2 Lui. 1410, & 1413. But the N 

a 


3 „ 


TRESPASS. 639 
adds, That Juſtice Powell, as to the firſt Ex- | 
ception, anſwered, That it was ſaid that the | 
Plaint was levied ad Curiam I. C. by which it Excep. 1 K 4. 
was implied, that he was then Sheriff. To a 
fourth Exception, which was, That no Place 
was alledged where the Sheriff's Warrant was 
„rade, which is iſſuable; he ſaid, the Warrant 
was made in the Court when Judgment was 
ven; for it is ſaid, Super quo quidem Fudicio 
od proſecution” Quer poſtea ſcilt eiſdem Die & Anno 
medi W. C. adtunc Vic, &c. per quoddam War. 
an” ſuum, and by that it ſhall be intended 
hat the Judgment was given, and the Warrant 
ade, all at one Time and one Place. Alſo the 
eporter obſerves, That as to the Excep- 
tion; it had of late Time been adjudged, that Pleading by 
e Proceedings in ſuch Inferior Courts may be Taliter pro- 
kaded by a Taliter proceſſum fuit, as 2 Mod. ceſſum fuit. 
lp. 102. & 195. 
Note, The 3d Exception was, That no par- 
cular Place was alledged within the Juriſdicti - Exception 3. 
tn where the Cauſe of Action aroſe. 
The 5th was, That the Sheriff's Warrant 6. 
phe to be directed Ballivis Vic, and not to 
rial Bailiffs, as here. 
And the 6th Exception was, That by a 6. 6 
vari out of the County-Court the Goods | 
y not be ſold, but they ſhall only be taken | [ 
Diſtreſs, and put into the Pound, if there | ' 
Til ao Cuſtom for it, and if there be, the 
2 Mfcndants ought to have ſhewn it, Reilway 
* 06, a. Br. Execut. 80. 
* for that the Levari is, De Terri: & Catal. 7- 
whereas it ought to be, De Bonis & Catallis, 


re 

it 
be 
in. 
Wat 


hath 


nedl 
no 
the 
on 


adon 


Y ht t 


„ will 
at W2 


Narr. for taking and detaining of his Defendant 
tle until he had paid 10 J. 17 5. Non Cul by juſtifies, Cr. | 
ond and the others juſtify the taking by Vers .. 


add tue 


. * a 
* n r 
e 
7 R 
* * 


8 TRESPASS. 
| Defendant tue of three ſeveral Levaries upon three ſeveral 
juſtifies by Judgments in an Hundred Court, at the Suit 
| e of the Defendants, and others, and the Detain. 
of Hundred ing till paid; and that they delivered the Pre- 
Court, and cepts to the other Defendant, then Bailiff 
Detainer and he, at their Requeſt, took the Cattle, and 
quouſque, he he detain'd them for Default of Buyers till the 
debe Dt Plaintiff paid the ſaid 107. 17 5. wiz. 10 
= ges an ö 
: Charges. 10 5. 9 d. for the Damages recovered, and 
6 s. 3 d. for his neceſſary Charges and Ex- 
pences disburſed in keeping the Cattle. Plain. 
tiff demurs thereupon. Vide 2 Lut. 1439, 
1446. Where tis {aid no Judgment was given 
but that the Court enclined, that the 63. 34 
for conſerving the Cattle were reaſonable and 

neceſſary Charges. | | 
Defendatits . Narr. for breaking and entring his Houſe 
1 juſtify at ano- at Norwich, and taking and carrying away d. 
F ther Day, vers Goods to the Value of 56 J. and for de- 
_ 8 _ taining the Goods in the ſaid Houſe for a lony 
they are guil- Time, Ce. Ion Cu” to Part; and as to the 
ty aliter, Reſidue they juſtify at another Day than i 
the Nar per un Attachiament” per bona, upon: 
Plaint in Debt of 407. levied in the Court 
held before the Sheriffs of the City of N. &. 
and that the Plaintiff appeared at the Retor 
of the Precept, and thereupon the Goods were 
Judgment delivered to him, with an Averment Que 


or ue eadem, Cc. and with a Traverſe, that they at 

of ha Tra- guilty aliter vel alio modo; the Plaintiff demur 

verſe, which for Cauſe, that the Traverſe ought to ha! 

is ſpecially been omitted, and Judgment for the Plaintil 
demurr'd-to. ide 2 Lut. 1452, & 1457. | 0 

Upon this Argument it was reſolved, 1. Thi 

if a Treſpaſs be alledged the 10th of Now. ani 

the Juſtification is the 11th, yet if there be al 

Averment inthe Plea, Que eſt eadent rranſgrd t 

Ss. as in this Caſe, that the Plea is goo 

without any Traverſe. 2., "Thi 


judgment was given ſor the Plaintiff: But it 


TRESPASS! 640 
2. That alcho' the Plea was ſufficient in 
Matter of Subſtance, yet the Addition of the 
Traverſe (alcho' meer Surpluſage) being ſpeci- 
{ly ſhewn for Cauſes had made it ill. 

3. That an Attachment of ſuch a Number Such an At- 
of Goods was not juſtifiable; and Juſtice tachment not 
Powell ſaid, That one ſingle Thing alone might juſtifiable. 
de attached; and by the Chief Juſtice, that 
there ought to be a reaſonable Diſtreſs to make 
the Defendant appear. 

4- That it does not appear that the Sheriffs, That the 
before whom the Court was held, had any Traverſe did 
Authority to hold them ; and for theſe Reaſons — cs = 
was agreed by all, That the Traverſe, aliter vel 
alw modo, did not extend to Time, but to the 
Manner of doing the Thing, as per 3 Cro. 433. 

Aſeue and Saunderſon's Cale. 

Adem 2 Lut. 1458, &c. Aſſault and Bats Defendants 

tery by Baron and Feme, for aſſaulting the juſtify by a 


"i Wiſe aum [ola ; Defendants juſtify arreſting Warrant up- 


the Wife by a Sheriff's Warrant upon a Cap on a Cap" 44 


d reſpond” ; and that thereupon ſhe aflaulted — 


the Defendant, Et iſſint de Son Aſſault Demeſne. 
Rep” de injuria ſua propr abſque tali Warranto, 
Et boc pet qd inquiratur per Priam', Def demurr 
& pro Cauſis eo qd predict? placitum predict 
& E. ſuperius replicando plitat' non eſt ſufficiens 
reſpons' ad predid placitum ipſius G. ſuperius in 
barram plitat' ſed RepÞ iſta eſt argumentativa du- 


plex & incerta & null” Exit apte jungere nec ve- 


redem? ſuper inde reddere poteſt, Et qd Quer male 


traverſant materiam in ea parte traverſabil ac Re- 


plicaco concludit ad Priam', ubi verificare debnit, 


&c. 14. 1460. But Judgment was given for 
the Plaintiffs, becauſe it was not ſhewn by Judgment 


the Defendants from what Court the Capra: — 


iſſued; alſo the Court inclined, that the Re- ſnewn from 
Tt plication what Court. 


* 


642 TRESPASS. 
plication was good, tho' it was not with Ab/qu 
hoe, that there was ſuch a Warrant inſtead of 
de injuria Jus propr abſq; tali Marranto. 

Defendants {+ Narr. againſt two for taking and carrying 


justify by Pro. Way a Horſe, Ni dic by one, the other juſti 
270 F — a7 fies by an Attachment per bona ad reſpond” Out 


created by of an Inferior Court created by Letters Patent, 


Letters Pa. 


en Demurrer thereupon, and Judgment for the 


Plaintiff; for that by Letters Patents all Procek 


are to be directed to the Serjeant at Mace, andf 


executed by him, and not to the other Defen. 

dant C. and executed by C. Vide 2 Lut. 1461, 

1464, Oc. 
Judgment . Id. 2 Lut, 1385. Narr. for entring hi 
againſt De- Cloſe, and taking his Goods; Bar, and jaſti. 


fendants for fies by a Warrant from the Sheriff upon a H 


Safe g, fo, open : Judgmer: c d B. againſt on 


Dun, The Plaintitf demurs, and Judgment 
for the Plaintiff, becauſe the Defendants did 
not appear and plead Nec in perſona nec per ali 
iT f quem Attorn, only thus, Et predict R. & J. per 
= M S. Attors' ſuum, vim & injur quando, Ot, 
= | and alſo, becauſe it is not averr'd, that the 
Goods were the Goods of Dun; and if there 
had been ſuch Averment, yet ſome ſpecial 
Matter to juſtify the Entry ought to have been 
ſhewn, as that they were there, per Tort di 

Plaintiff, ec. Id. 1387. 
"Bar by F' fs” ff. © De Aveiiis capt', Bar qd' cepit avetis 
till he paid © virtute Warrant” Vic? ſuper brevi de Fi' ta” & 
the Money to © detinuit quouſq; Quer' denar' Def* ad uſum 
— of © Vic' ſolviſſet pro deliberatione Averiorum, 
Et travers' qd eſt cul ante talem diem & 
© poſt retorn' brevis; Plaintiff demurs, Et pro 
© Cauſts qd placitum predict? male traverſat 
mater & tempus in ea parte traverſat ag 
travers ill extra idem placitum omittꝭ deb. 
© illet, &c. Vide 2 Ven. 9, 9. And Judgment 
4 wu 


— 
A CO dehe -—— hr RR 
£ rn * 
w * * LY dy: 7 x 
- o l 


323 7 ene a Sr a HH£4 — 


TRESPASS. 
was given for the Plaintiff, Two Judges held the 
Plea ill, becauſe he pleads, that he detain'd the 
Cattle till che Plaintiff had paid fo much Mo- And Judg- 
ney to the Uſe of the Sheriff, whereas it ment againſt 
ought to have been, to the Uſe of the Plaintiff, Def ndants 
at whoſe Suit the Execution was. Other for ill Plead- 


two Judges held the Plea good as to that 8. 
Point, for that the Sheriff had a ſort of ſpe- 


643 


| cial Property in the Thing taken in Execu- 


tion; but yet held the Plea | inſufficient, 

becauſe the Declaration is of a Deteiner un- 

til the Money was paid to Francis and the 
Defendant ; and in the Plea the Juſtification 

is of the Detaining till the Money was paid to 

Francis, Vide plus inde, Dow” Demurr' 302, 

303, Ce. Vide poſtea de Avers, 

{/. © Trans de Domo fract', Et juſtificat' ut Habere fac 

© Ballivus Vic' per Warr' ei direct ſuper breve poſs”. 
de Habere fac' poſſeſſionem. Thompſ. 3 30. 


. Vide 2 Lut. 1381, Cc. Narr. for break- Entry by Ha- 
ing and entring his Houſe, and taking away bere fac poſs”. 


his Goods, and for Allault, Battery, and 
wounding the Plaintiff ; nor Guilty by one, 
the other juſtifies by a Warrant upon a Writ 
of Habere fac poſſs/ſionem, of three Meſſuages 
in H. and then he entred into one, and deli. 
ver'd Poſſeſſion; and by the Command of the 
Plaintiff, in Ejectment, took the Goods out 


of the ſaid Houſe, and put them in the High- And put the 
way near by, and there left them, and that he Goods in the 


requeſted the Plaintiff to come forth, which he High-way. 
refuſed: Whereupon he laid his Hands upon And the 


him, and thereupon the Plaintiff aſſaulted the Plaintiff re- 
Defendant, who made Defence for himſelf, fu{*d to come 


3 
c. RepP de injuria ſua propr' abſq; tali cauſa. forth, Cc. 


Defendant demurs, and the Plaintiff join'd in 


Id. 1384. 


2 . 2 
1 [ 


MVSEVM | 
BRITANNICVM 


Demurrer. 


= 


* 
— —— &FAñ—- —— — — — — . — FDI . SE. — 


— 
*» 


NN ä - — * *** 


2 — 3 — C-- 


— En 


— 


1 ———  — —— 


8 


644 
Rep!' de in- 
jur* ſoa 
propr ill. 


Want of 
Traverſe. 


Non Cul", and 


get Entry i, 


Judic' pro 
Def”. s 


Declaration 
ill, for not 


expreſſing the 


Quantity or 
Quality. 


Bar ill, not 
fay ing he de- 
livered Poſ- 
ſeſſion to IV. 


TRESPASS. 


It was firſt ohjected, That the Replication 
was ill, and fo it was reſolved, for that it is 
only (aid, that the Defendant made the Tref. 
pals De injuria ſua propr, the which in no Caſe 
without the Words Ab/[q; tali cauſa, will be a 
good Iſſue; but in this Caſe, either the Writ 
of Habere fac poſſiſſionem, or the Warrant there: 
upon, ought to be traverſed, according to Cro- 
gat's Cale. Co. 8. 

Then ic was excepted againſt the Bar, That 
the Defendant Pullen had pleaded Non CuP to 
the Treſpaſs in the Houſe in the Declaration, 
and yet had juſtified the Entry into the ſaid 
Houſe by Vertue of the Writ ; and that not 
heing denied, it was ruled, that the Bar was 
ill according to the Caſe of Allen and Browne, 
1 Rolls Rep. 49, & 52. But afterwards, upon 
reading the Record, it was found to be a Mi- 
ſtake, for the Defendant had pleaded Not 
my as to the Houle in A. mentioned in the 

eclaration, and had juſtified the Battery, Cc. 
by Entry into another Houſe in H. by Vertue 
of the Warrant, and fo Judgment was given 
for the Defendant. 

The Reporter obſerves, That the Declara- 
tion was ill as to the Goods, becauſe the 
Quantity or Quality of them is not expreſs'd ; 
but makes a Quzre, if not made good by the 
Bar, according to Pell and Garlick's Caſe, 
2 Ls:. 1489. which ſee before. He alſo notes, 
That the Defendant Pullen pleads, that he 
enter*d into the Houſe in H. to deliver Pol- 
ſelſion, Secundum exigenc brevis, and that he, 
by the Command of the ſaid V. took the 
Goods out of the Houſe, &-c. but he does not 
ſay that he deliver'd the Poſſeſſion to Vc. 
but that nothing was ſaid to it upon the Ar- 
gument of the Caſe. 


am AM ww». © .  Q 


Lad 


n 
is 
. 
ſe 
2 


P 


TRESPASS. 645 
Qd' Def' Virtute Warr' ei direct' per Cepit Ave- 
© Vic'de Re plegiari ſac' intravit in Clauſum & 3 act” 
© Averia Quer* cepit. Thorp. 312. Simile, — epieg, 

Bro. Red. 476, Et Repl' qd' Quer' tee? cap- 
* tionis clamavit proptietat', Rejo' qd? Quer 
 clamavic proprietat' aliorum Averiorum, Et 
t travers' qd” clamavit proprietat' Averiorum 
in brevi. Vide poſtea de Frank. Tenement 
ff. Bar per Def T. Q4 le Def P. fuit poſſeſs, Bar per Re- 
of three ſeveral Heifers, and one Calf, and that pleg'. 
the Plaintiff unjuſtly took them out of his Poſſeſ- 
ſion: Whereupon the Deſendant P. made Com- 
plaint to the Sheriff, who made a Warrant to 
the Defendant to replevy them, per quod he 
enter d into the faid Cloſe, and chaſed the ſaid 
Heifers, &c. being amongſt other Cattle in 
the ſaid Cloſe, and deliver'd them to the De. 
ſendant P. Cc. Plaintiff demurs, and upon Pur 


the Argument theſe Exceptions were taken to 
the Bar. 


1. That it was not ſaid, that the Defendant Exception r. 
P. was poſſeſſed of the faid three Heifers, and fer. the Poſ- 
one Calf, ut de Averiit ſuis proprits, es 

2, That no Place was expreſs'd where the As to the 
Complaint to the Sheriff was made, nor where Place of 
the Sheriff's Warrant was made. Complaint. 

3. That the Defendant ought to have plead- p,, cu”, the 
ed, that the Warrant was made in Writing, Declaration 
but no Exceptions were reſolv'd by the Court; ill for not 
for it was agreed, That the Declaration was og 
ill, as to the chaſing the Plaintiff's Cattle firſt tte. 
mentioned in the Declaration, for that the 
Species of them are not ſhewn, and thereupon 
the Parties agreed to amend on both Sides. 
Bat another Exception was taken by the 
Court, wiz, That by the laſt Part of the De- 
claration, the Plaintiff complains of taking and 

SY carry- 


64 


Defendant's 
Plea ill. 


Defendant 
juſtifies by a 
Writ De ho- 
mine replegi- 
ano, Viz. 


W. I. 


Jodgiyent. 
r Zur for 
want "RG 
Averment, 
that . 
was in the 
Plaintiff's 
Houle. 

11 


thereon; 
cially, and the Defendant joins in Demurrer. 


TRESPASS. 


carrying away chree Heifers, Cc. ipſius F. D 
and the Defendant juſtifies the raking and car. 
rying away three Heifers, Oc. of the Defen- 
dant P. and ſo the Declaration as to that was 
not anſwered ; and that without Queſtion was 
a fatal Exception, for he ought to have plead- 
7 Non CuP to the taking and carrying away 


the Cattle of the Plaintiff, Vide 2 Lat. 1372, 


1374. 


Narr. againſt two, for Aſſault, Battery 
and Menaces, Cc. and breaking open his 
Dwzlling-houſe, Cc. One of the Defendants 
juſtifies by Vertue of a Writ De homine replegian. 
do V. L. and a Warrant delivered to the other 


ſtom the Sheriff for that Purpoſe, in whoſe 


Aid he entred, the Door being open, and the 
Plaintiff aſſaulted him, whereupon molliter 1a. 
nus impoſuit, Ce. The other Defendant im- 
parls. The Plaintiff prays Oyer of the Sheriff's 
Warrant, which appeats to be directed o all 
his Bai ifs, and then replies, De inqur* ſua 
props, and traverſes that the firſt Defendant 
entred by Command of the other Defendant: 
The ſaid Defendant rejoins, that he entred, & 
by Command of the other, and tenders Iſſue 
and thereto the Plaintiff demurs ſpe- 


Vide 2 Lut. 1428, & 143 2. And it is obſerv'd, 
That after ſeveral Exceptions to the Inſuffici 


-ency of the Defendant's Pleading, upon the 


fond Argument, Judgment was given for the 
Plaintiff. no Councel appearing for the Defen- 
4zntz and chiefly, as is ſuppoſed, for the De- 
te& of not averring, That . L. who was to 
be reple vied, was in the Plaintiff's «*Houle” 
zt the Time of the Entry made, c. See 
in ger 


more heteof, and of the Cauſes of Demurring, 
in Doct Demurr 207, 208, 209. 0 
J Narr. for Alſault and Battery, Defen- Defendant 
lane juſtifies an Arteſt by Sheriffs War- juſtifies by 
ant upon a Bill of Aiddleſeæ, who thereupon n B11 
aſſaulted him, Et iſſint Son Aſſault Demeſne, & c. . 
Plaintiff demurs, Eo qd per placitum non apparet 
i Bill Mid? delilat' fuit Vie ante trans & inſult 
ue d placitum eſt duplex incert & caret forma. 
1. San. 295, Cc. But the Court was of Opi- 
nion, That by the Pleadings it ſhould be in- 
tended the Writ was delivered before the War. 
tant made, and that the Demurrer admitted Pemutter, 
the Delivery of the Bill, altho“ he had ſhewn ft that i did 
for Cauſe the Want of an Averment of the — 
Delivery of the Bill; and the Court was feady delivered be- 
to give Judgment for the Deſendant: But they fore the 
50 the Plaintiff Leave to diſcontinue upon Treſpals, 
ayment of Coſts, becauſe, in Truth, the Bill 
was not deiiver'd to the Sheriffs till after the 
Arreſt, as the Court was inform'd by the Plain- 
tiffs Councel. Idem 299, zoo. Vide ante, 
as to Plea of no Notice of Delivery of the 
Writ to the Sheriff. 


Bar de Nocumentis. 


K © Arr' de Domo fa&t' & Camino pro. Defendant 
0 , „eier: ö juſtifies 
ſtrat'. Barqd'Quer' erexit Caminum — 


ſuper murum Def? quod nocumentꝰ ad amo- 3, . 
* vend', Def* cum ferreis inſtrumentis pro- Chimney. 
© ſtravit; Rep! de injur' propr?, Et eravers;,qd” 
© Caminus erect' fuir ſuper murum Def”, Ex 
© Iſſue inde. Thowp. 368. 
' © Ad Narr' in Trans pro fractione ripa- So of Banks, 

rum & exclus' foſſat' Quer*?, Def” juſtificat 
fraction' inde in preſervatione terrarum 
© Matiſc' ſuarum ſuperflux* per erection eo- 

„ rundem 


TRESPASS. 64% 


Warrant up- 


— = 
— * 
_— — EONS Cat 


dieided on 


648 TRESPASS. 


rundem pet Quer. Bro. Vad. 508. Repl' de 
© ipjur? ſua propr'. | 


Bar de Rent ou Services, 


1. Reſpaſs & Bar per Demiſe, reddend red. 
roy af T dit & Heriot vil 3 l. in loco inde, and 


Heriot. juſtify taking the Cattle for a Heriot. Thomy|, 
267. Vide poſtes Tit Demiſe & Tit ſur Cuſtome, 
Ce. . Heriot, Cc. * 
"COAT ff. Vide 2 Lut. 1361, Oc. Treſpaſs for ta. 
2 3 king of a Gelding; Defendant pleads in Bar, 
ceaſe after That P. S. the Defendant's Grandfather be- 
one Life end · ing ſeized, demiſed to D. E. his Executors 
d. and Aſſigns for 99 Years, if ſhe and one 
M. V. ſhould fo long live, rendring after the 
Death of the ſaid D. and A ſuum vel eorum 
optimum Animal, or 40 5. in Lieu thereof, pro. 
vided that no Heriot ſhould be paid after the 
Death of A. living D. That the Reverſion, 
by ſeveral Deſcents, came to the Defendant ; 
That the ſaid D. took to Husband the now 
Plaintiff, and died, and afterwards M. died, 
Plaigtiff de. ber quod, &c. and fo juſtifies for an Heriot. 
- murr'd, cm Whereupon the Plaintiff, after Oyer of the In- 
' Caufir, and denture, demurr'd, Et pro Cauſis, qd non appa- 
the Court was yet per placitum predictꝰ quoad caption” & abduttio. 
r Spadonis predict“ placitat qd ſpado predict 
mae. gu. "capt? 5 ſuper premiſſa predict ſuperius conceſs & 
qd” placitum predict eſt vitioſum & caret forma, 
Idem 1366. Upon the Argument of this De. 
murrer, it appears the Court was divided, two 
Juſtices being againſt two, in their Opinions 
concerning the ſeizing the Heriot upon the 
Death of A. V. Idem 1367. 


A gainſs 


A, 


TRESPASS. 649 
c 


Againſt Baron and Feme for Treſpaſs of 
0 the Wife. 


| ount againſt Baron and Feme for the Bar, that tho 
2 Wiſe's breaking and entring his Cloſe Wife di- 

nd Houſe, and carrying away his Goods, &c. ſtrain'd for 

Defendants plezd Non Cul to all, except * 

deaking and entring into his Houſe, and ta- 

ling and carrying away his Goods; and as to 

dem, juſtify by Diſtreſs made by the Wiſe for 

Rent reſerv'd upon a Leaſe made by the Baron 

rs Wo the Plaintiff, Rep, That after the Diſtreſs, Rh, that 

ne Ie Defendant's Wiſe uſed and fold his Goods ie, vid and 

he Wiltrained : Rejoinder, which is a Juſtification ur da 

m Force of the Statute 2 V. & M. cap, . 

0. Which gives Power to ſell the Diſtreſs, &. 9g fy / 2 

he aintiff demurs, Et pro cauſa, Qd' materia Re- Demut 

n, Nadionis eff nova, & junior materie iu barra, G- C — cn 

eſſus abinde, ad materiaiu Rejunctione ſupponitur 


t ſecundum formam Statuti, & materia in barra 


— 


d, Nyonitur efſe ſecundum communem Legem. Vide 

ot. L. 1421, 1425, Ge. And Judgment was Suk 
n- en for the Plaintiff, r. Becauſe it was ſaid 2 Que, be. 
ba. the Bar in which ic was ſaid, That the De- cauſe of bad 
10. udant Jobn was ſeized in Dominico ſuo ut de Pleading. 


b, of the Houſe in the Narr. in the Right of 
[ his Wife, which is no good Pleading, for 
ey ate both ſeized in the Right of the Wiſe, 


de. nd fo are all the Precedents. 2. That by the 
vo Weclaration the Wife only is charged to be 
ns e Treſpaſſor, and yet to all the Treſpaſs 


ter, Cc. they have both pleaded, d ipſi non 
mt inde Culpabiles, and allo Non Cu? to the 
taining the Poſſeſſion of the Houſe, and 
lat is bad Pleading after Verdict, 3 Cro. 883. 
x and Crapnell, which was affirmed in Er- 

ror. 


ror. Note, There were other Exceptions made, W :r 
but the Court gave Judgment upon the two MP! 
firſt, being clear without any Reſolution of the Wm 
other Exceptions. Idem 1426. Vide Dif Mu: 

| Demurr 351, 352, &c. A 

Bar for Rent . Vide 2 Lut. 1532, Cc. Narr. for taking W 1 

Atreat for his Cattle 21 April 1701. and of other Cattle 

"a * "the ſame Day: Bar by a Demiſe of part of x 

oy Rey reſerving Rent, and that 77 J. 10 
was in Arrear, cc. and ſo they juſtity the ]W/. 
firſt Taking for 62 J. 10 5. Parcel, and the 
laſt Taking for the Reſidue. Plaintiff demus M : 
ſeverally to the Pleas, and one Joinder to both 
Demurreis. 1 

one may not Upon thoſe Demurrers, Judgment was given h 

avow ewo for the Plaintiff, becauſe the ſecond Diltrels ! 

 DPiſtreſſesfor as not legal, for one may not avow two D. 

3 and the ſtreſſes for one and the ſame Rent, and it vs 

ame Rent. Polly that he did not make ſufficient Diſtr / 
at firſt, Moo. 7. . 26. Cro. Eliz. 13. u. 8. Ul / 
1536. 0 

Sed quere, if It is here made a Quere, if the ſecond Di 11 

ſo be there ſtreſs had been jaltifiable, admitting that it C 

was not ſuffi-· was pleaded, That at the Time of taking the © 

cient for a Di- firſt Diſtreſs there was not a ſufficient DiltrelMl Sc 

ſtreſs at firſt, upon the Land demiſed. and that the firſt Di 00 
ſtreſs was only of ſuch a Value, &c. V lt 
Doc Demurr 222, 223. - _ 

Bar by Di- f. Tdem, 2 Lut 1573, Cc. Narr. for brei“ 

ſtreſs for ing his Cloſe, called B. Cloſe, and taking d Ft 

Rent. three Cows; Now Cul to the breaking of 
Cloſe; and as to the taking of the three Com 
that they took them in B. Meade, of which, 
inter alia, the Defendant C. and another wet 

“. That poſſeſſed for Term of Years, & c. and damit 

the Cattle them to one W. V. rendting certain Rent not 


0 8 
were not e. and for Rent Arrear they diſtrained. RH 
vant and cou- 


chant, and That the Cattle were not levant and couchant 3 } 
Iſſue. x08 - 


— Xx — _ - 


7 


TRESPASS. 
and Iſſue thereupon, and Verdict for the 
Phintiff ; and Judgment for him, altho' it Was 
moved in Arreſt of Judgment, that the Iſſue 


was immaterial. See much Learning upon this 
Argument concerning Levant and Couchant. 


Elim 1577, 1578, 1579, 1580, 1581. 


Bar, De Amercements, Ge. 


DRO Amerciament in Cur' Vis 
6 Franc' Pleg*. Raſt. Ent. 606. Thompſ. 


W211. 


se Simile in Cur” Let'. Id. ibm. & Vet. 
 lotr, 1 56. | | 


/. © Simile ut Ballivus Hundred'. 1 Brownl. 
176, Bro, Rediviv. 478. 

/. * Simile de Turno in Hundred'. Id. 181. 
Smile Bro. Red. 480. 

. Simile ad Letam. 3 Bronl, 467. 


J. Per Ballivum Manerii pro ſorisſactut“. 
Co. Ent. 665. 


. Qd' un' Def” ut Ballivus Major? & 
Coitat London', Manerii ſui de S. & al' in 


© £jus auxilium ceper” bona Quer' virtute Warr" 


Senllo' Manerii pro levatione 100 s. de Fine 
ſaper Quer' impoſuit pro contempr” in recu- 


 latione fore in Officium de Scavenger. 


1 Browne 245. 
J. Simile pro Fine impoſuit in Cur' Vis 
Ftanc' Pleg'. Id. 347. 


Bar de Frank-Tenement. 


I Iberum Tenementum plitat', Rep! qd' 
* 1, eft liberum Tenementum Quer' & 


non Def?.” Raſt. En. 647. Co. Ent. 675. 


Vet. Intr. 43. Aſs. 436. Simile cu' travery.. 
J Brownl, 456. | 


J. © Simile 


651 


7 


„  \TLESPASS. 


A © Simile pro Servien'. Raſt. 605, 609. the 
* Locus in quo eſt liberum Tenementum the 
>» Det' & Ux'. Rep! qd' liberum Tenemen. fu 
* tum Quer' & non Del' & Ux'. Raf. En, Juc 
© 648. 
7 © Liberum Tenementum plitat', Now f 
* Aflignaco' & non Cul inde. Ro. Ent. 45). 
J. * Quoad part non Cul' & ad ab part l 
© liberum Tenementum 1. corum & alter juſt;. 
© ficat' 'ut ſerviens. Raſt, Ent. 648. Vide 
* Thompſ. 30x. 
Traverſe. f. * Det* plitat' liberum Tenementum, 
© QQuer* Rep! de injur' ſua propr', Et travem 0 
© Frank-Tenement de Def'. 2 Lat. 1400, 
© &c. Adjudged, That be ought to conclude ad ba 
© triam where there is no new Aſſignment. | 
Ley of . Vide ante Garlick's Caſe, That there af Sg 
Ground. many Cloſes called Ley of Ground, but none 6 
without other Additions; and that the Locks u 
quo was Called Garlick's Ley of Ground, his Free: 
hold, &c. 2 Lut. 1489. » 
After Libe- fl. Vide 3 Lev. 194. Trans pro caption”, & — 
yum Tenemen- quouſq; finem feciſſit. Bar by a Suit in tif 5" 
tem pleaded, County Court againſt the Plaintiff, and othenf 
rhe County in Replevin, Summons, Attorney, Apper 
Court had - _— | 
no Power to TANCe, and Cognizance, as Bailiff of the Ex 
proceed. of A. and plead Liberum Tenementum, and (ur 
ther Proceſs in the County Court: Iſſue 20 
Verdict againſt the now Plaintiff, and a Leun 
Facias awarded to the Bailiff, per quod, &. 
The Plaintiff demurs. Id. 201, Cc. Upo 
the Argument it was held, for that the no 
Plaintiff had in that Court pleaded Liben 
Tenementum in Juſtification of taking 
Damage Feſant : That by that Tryal 
Charge upon the Freehold is in Meftion 
and after Liberum Tenementum pleaded, tht) 
had no Power to proceed in the Cauſe, n: 


th 


il 
* 


T RES PASS. 683 


ther directly nor collaterally, and therefore 

the Proceedings after ſuch Plea were Coram non Judic' pro 
Fudice, and void; and upon this Exception Quer'. 
judgment was given for the Plaintiff. | 


Bar per Grant del Roy. 


| 
1 N. Ent. 608, 633, 643. Plo. 254, 
. 384, 477. 

Per Fine Levie. 

. Enr. 6. 2 Co. 6. 

9 

1 Per Feoffment. 


f. Raſt, Ent. 629, 641. Uyper. Bench Pref. 
ee. Thompſ, 341. Rob. Ent. 468. 


Ne 1 
2 De Diſſerſen. ö 4 


. Raſt. 629, 641, 648. Co. Ent. 280, 660, ; ki 
i Brown/. 467. Rob. En. 4 5. Placit. Gen. 604. | 
lune Ent. 343. 


Per Terres Deviſe &. Aſſugnment. 4 


; Bil Bro, Red. 494, 496. Vide 2 Lut, 1337, 
pe, Judic pro Def, tor the bad Pieading of 
a Aſſignment made by an Executtix. 


Per Terres in Tail. 


ſſ. Raſt. 642, 659. Co. Ent. 667. 1 Co. 80, 
7. Plo. 39. | 


—_— . 


Per 


654 


TRESPASS. 


| Per Diſcent. 


ſſ. Raft. 631, 632. 3 Brownl. 447. Thom) ſ 
336. Winch. En. 102. Rob. Em. 476, 47), 


479. Bro, Red. 497. 


iſ. Vide 2 Lut. £327, c. That it is repup 
nant to ſay, that Lands are Copyhold, a 
yet are diſcendible. 


Per Eſcheat. 
il. Raft. Ent. 638. Vet. Intr, 34. 4 


Per Jointenancie. 


ſl. Upper- Bench Preſ. 168. 1 Brown's En | 
341. Thomp/. 296, 338. | 


Per Tudgment. 


ſſ. Sur Breve de Reo, clo, &. 1 Brown 
183. 


Bar per Demiſe. 


fl. Ide Raſt. Ene. 655, 656, 658. C0. 

677. Hern 715. Vet, Intr. 239. | 
per-Bench Preſ. 171, 173. 1 Bro, 350. 2 
252, 287. Tbompſ. 310, 316, 329, 404,40 
Winch, Ent. 992, 1900, 1003, 1007. Bro. 
490. Placit. Gen. 609, 613. Vide poſtea, if 
ſcription per Cuſtom, 


. 24 


TRESPASS. 655 


Bar, De Cuſtumarie Terres. 


. Aſt. Ent. 280, 627. Co. Ent. 280, 
R 657, 660, 662, 645. Hern 724. 
"Wu; Brown! 463, 474. Rob, Ent. 465, 470. 
 Thomp/. 396. Winch, Ent. 988. 2 Browns 
Ent. 279. Vide 2 Lut, 1324. That the Lands 
are Copyhold, and yet dilcendible, is repug- 
nant. . O 


De ReFories &. Diſmes, 


f. N Ent. 624, 635, 636. 3 Brownl, 
453. Hern 709, 726. Upper- Bench 
, 19f.. M. 009 13, 193, 214 
om. 415. 2 Bro. 271, 285. Winch. Ent, 
939, 1006. 


ſe. Vide 2 Lut. 1301. Narr. for Entry, and 
breaking his Cloſes and Houſe, Cc. and ta- 
ling away the Tythes. Defendant pleads Now Non Cul, and 
cl, and ſpecial Verdict, and Judgment for Verdict pro 
tte Plaintiff, but not upon the Matter in Law, _ : 4 
Which was intended to be determin'd by the — = : 
ſpecial Verdict; which was, That if the Value Law as in- 
of the Church of S. ſhould be taken and com- tended. 
puted according to the real Value thereof, or 
zecordant to the Value thereof in the Book of 
We Firſt Fruits. Vide eund 1304, 1305, 
1396, 1307, & 1308. 

ide eund? 2 Lut. 1314, Cc. Trans' for 
reaking, and Entry in his Cloſe, and taking and 
rrying away five Load of Hay. Bar, That one Bar by Lay- 
Ii the Defendants, (being a Layman) at the man, that he 
ime, gr. was ſeized of the Tythes of the Hay was ſeized of 
f the laid Cloſe, without ſhewing how; and ; Tring 
ze laid five Loads were Tythes ſever'd, G 
and 


N 


— 


. 
— — 
* — Py Pu Þ 


7 
= - 
© 
9 
A 
4% 
b 
. 
. 
bs 
"2 
q 
3 
= 
E 
b 
| 


990 2 ————— — —— 


656 


Repl!' and 
Traverſe, 
that they 
were Tythes 
ſevered. 


TRESPASS. 
and ſo juſtify for them in the ſaid Cloſe. Rey 
de injur ſua propr* ; and traverſes, that the ſaid 
five Loads were Tythes ſever'd. Defendants 
demur with Cauſes, Eo 94 predict H. traverſat 
quantitatem feni predict“ pro Decimis ut prefertw 
expoit?, &. Idem 3116. It is obſerved, That 
this Caſe is reported in 3 Lev. 228. But be. 
ſides what is reported in that Book, it is faid, 
an · Objection was made by the Plaintiff 
Councel, That the pleading of a Seiſin, &. 


If pleading a without ſaying of what Eſtate, was not good, 


Seiſin, with» 
out ſaying o 
what Eſtate, 
be good 1a a 
Bar, 


If a Layman 
may plead 
Seiſin of 
Tythes. 


Action for 


being in Bar, Sed non allocatur; yet it hath 
f been ſaid (ex relatione Servien Carthew) to be 
ill in Avowry upon ſpecial Demurrer. But 
Quere, (lays the Reporter) if that need to be, 
for it is altogether uncertain; becauſe it may 
be that he was ſeized for his own Life, or for 
the Life of another, in Tail General or Special 
or Fee. 3 
2. Another Exception was taken, That the 
Defendant being a Layman could not plead 1 
Seiſin of Tythes, which, according to Saundin 
and Sandford's Caſe, 2 Cro. 437. (which wy 
cited to that Purpoſe) ſeem'd to be a ſtronp 
Objection, Sed non allocatur. 


Bar de Arbres. 


i, Ide poſtea de Eſtovers, Ft vide Ver. 

V trac. 156, 158, 160, 162. Ri 
Ent. 637, 647, 649, 675. 2 Bro. 250, BY 
Method Noviſ. 378. Winch Ent. 986. N 
Em. 467. 


of. Vide 2 Tut. 1390, & c. Narr. for Cuttin 


cutting, &. down, carrying away, and convertiageol ti 


two Oaks. 


Oaks, Cc. As to the converting the Oaks 


his own Uſe, Non Cul. And as to the my 


TRESPASS. 


557 


That one R. B. was ſeized of the Manor Bar, that he; 
of S. which Eſtate che Plaintiff had; and a being a * 
Cuſtom for the Lord to grant Cuſtomary Te- , mY £6 


endant, by Writing ſigned, and not ſealed, 
during the Lives of the laid Lord and Tenant, 
ſhews the Death of the Lord; and that. at the 
Time of the Treſpaſs, an old Barn, .Parcel, 
e. was in, great Decay; and that the Defen- 
i cant, for the neceſſary rebuilding of it, cut 
g down the ſaid Oaks, and converted them to 
the ſaid Uſe of. rebuilding them, &c. Plain- 
tiff demurs. Vide 2 Lut. 1392. where tis ſaid; 
That this Caſe was never argued, but the Re- 
porter makes ſeveral Obſervations upon it. 


Several Obſervations on the a foreſaid Caſe. 


I, 4 AT though this Manner of paſſing 
Eſtates is ſtrange and unuſual, yet it 
had ſeveral Times beęn allawed to be good. 
2. That, it ſeem'd, the Eſtate in this Caſe; 
Eren by the Lord to the Defendant, ſhould 
ave Continuance after the Death of the Lord, 
if the Cuſtom is not co the contrary ; and for 
that Purpoſe, cites 5 Co. 13, Moor 398. & 
3 Caſe 32. EE = 
3. That it did. not appear, that the Oaks 
cut grew on the Premiſſes granted, fo that he 


- 


ſeem'd to be a fatal Exception. 


ployed them for Repairs, and therefore the 
Plea ſeem'd to be ill for that Caule. 


F. A Quere is made, Whether the Pleading 
of Non Cut, to the Converſion of the Oaks, 
VV ovght 


had not purſued the Cuſtom, and that this A 


nements by Writing ſealed, or only ſigned, So F a . 


&c. And then ſets forth a Grant by R. B. for rebuilding 
4 a Cuſtomary Houſe and Land to the De- an old Barti. 


fatal ER. 


| | ception. 
4. Nor that he had in convenient Time em- Simile. 


* 9 ad 
r 


4 


"I * * a | 2 
4 a. en oentc” HO RI nes pee. 2 AD : —_— —— 
* . 
- 
” 


N v 2 \ . " * * . 8 . * 4 = 4 1 me q » * * 1. 
„ : * W n 9 rn — 9 N — 0 7 
* 9 - N a 7 : l 8 

. 

. * 

75 ; — 6 
5 3 | 


- ought not to have been omitted, and the rather, 

| becauſe that ſeem'd on'y to be alledged for Ag - 
gravation of Damages; and refers to the Caſe 
of Hardal and Smith, Tiin, 12 V. 3. Roth, 


1789. 


Bar, by ent- . Vide 2 Lut. 1471. Treſpaſs for cutting 
ting down down and carrying away his Trees; Defendant 
Timber for pleads Not guilty to all, except five Oaks and 
_—_— five Elms, and as to them the Defendants juſti- 
— * fy by a Leaſe made by the Plaintiff, and 
ment. others, to F. V. &c. for their Lives, of a 
Meſſuage, with a Covenant on the Leſlee's 
Part for repairing the ſaid Meſſuage ; for 
which Purpoſe it ſhould be lawful for them to 
take upon the Premiſſes, by the Appointment 
of the Bailiff, convenient Timber; and that 
the Meſſuage was out of Repairs; and that the 
Bailiff, upon Requeſt, appointed the Leſlees 
to cut down apt and convenient Timber, &. 
and fo juſtify it being neceſſary; and that part 
of them were employed, and that the Reſidue 
had been ſo employed if the Plaintiff had not 
RepP, and prohibited it. Rep! de injur' ſua propr, with a 
traverſes the "Traverſe, that the Bailiff had appointed the 
Bailiff s Ap- cutting of the ſaid five Oaks and five Elms, 
Pointment. Defendant demurs, for that the Plaintiff had 
traverſed Matter not traverſable. The Opt 
Traverſe ill, nion of the Court was, that the Traverſe was 
and Bar ill, ill: But Judgment for the Plaintiff, becauſe 
— s the Bar was ill, for that it was not pleaded that 
_ the Bailiff had appointed ſuch a Number of 
Trees. Vide eund? 1480. 


ar 


nnn ß ans. i: dA 


| — 


—_w—_ ww _ A . = © 57a 


as AN 


Wo whe til, ow 


AY w ian coca 2 rr 


ar 


TRESPASS. 659 
Bar de Avers. Vide poſtea de 8 


[/ # Vs for entring the Plaintiff's Cloſe, Defendant 
and driving and impounding her 22 

Sheep. The Defendants to Part plead Nor ae = 
CuP; and as to the Reſidue, that the Defen- put his Cat- 
dant is Lord of the Manor, of which the Place tie into the 
in quo is Parcel: That he, and the other as his Cloſe to feed. 
Servant, put their Cattle in the Cloſe to feed, 
and that divers other Sheep of Perſons un- 
known, not having Right of Paſture, were 
feeding there, which they drove out : That And that the 
the Plaintiff 's Sheep were mingled with the Plaintiff's 
other, and the Defendants ſeparated them as 2 
ſoon as conveniently they could, and left them amongſt o- 
in the Cloſe. As to the Entry, Er pedibus am. thers not 
bulando &. berbæ conculcac, the Plaintiff de. commonable, 
murs, for that it amounts to the General Iſſue; — —— 
Et quoad chaſion & imparcacon', the Plaintiff 3 =: 
faith ſhe demanded Delivery of the Sheep, : 
but the Defendant refuſed, and kept them 24 
Hours, cc. Joinder in Demurrer, quoad part” Pemurrer, 
& quoad the Reſidue, Rejoinder in Mainte- &. 
nance of their Plea; and traverſe the Requeſt 
of the Delivery of the Sheep, and Reſuſal, 
Oc. Demurrer inde, by reaſon of the vitious 
Traverſe, Plaintiff joins in Demurrer. Vide Lev. 
Ent. 188. & 3 Lev. Rep. 40. 41, Cc. Thomas 
verſ. Nichols, And ſee Doct. Demurr. 306, 
307. 

. See 2 Lut. 1447. Treſpaſs for breaking his Defendant 


Cloſe, called Hurnets. Hill, at the Pariſh of R. juſtiſies in bis 


treading down his Graſs, taking and impound- moon = 
ing his Sheep, and keeping Poſſeſſion of the 2 6 Te? 
Cloſe. Defendants plead Non Cul to all, except verſe of the 
chaſing and impounding the Sheep; and as to Place. 
them, they pleaded, That the Detendant .. 


V v2 Was 


3 

1 
4 
Fi 
N 
kt 
F 
* 
4 


660 TRESPASS. 
was ſeized in Fee of a Cloſe, called New-Oy. 


chard, in R. aforeſaid, and fo juſtily Damage 
feaſant, A,; boc, 4d predict” W. & J. P. pre- 


| 

dict owes in predict Clo vocat H. fugaver ceper | 

& imparcaver prout, G c. Plaintiff demuts, | 

Eo qd' placitum incertum & caret forma. Et Def | 

traverſar materiam in placito illo que non eſt tra. 

Obj. That werſabiP, The Plaintiff's Council made ſeveral ] 

the Traverſe Objections, eſpecially to the Plea in Bar, and | 

was ill. for the Traverſe. Alſo, the Reporter makes { 

bis ſurther Obſervations; but he concludes, That MW * 

Sel 9. it not it ſeem'd to him that the Plea is ill, becauſe I ! 

being parti- je amounts to the general Iſſue of Not guilty, i | 

— ie but not unleſs more particularly ſhewn for ! 

Demurrer. Cauſe of Demurrer. Vide eund. 1449. & Dot, 1 | 

Demur. 304, 305. 

. Tieſpafs for breaking his Cloſe, and cha: I 

Bar by Copy- ſing his Cattle, Cc. Detendants plead, That Ml 1 

bold, dimifibi” the Meſſuage, Cc. are Copyhold, dimiſibil* ad \ 

s ten pore cu- dv“ulunt at . Sc. & deſcendibil jure bert. 

Joy Ov. ditar, vocat' Tenant Right, &c. ſhew a Titleto I | 

themſelves, and then juſtify for Damage feaſant I * 

in their Common of Paſture, &c. Plaintiff de. © 

murs, and ſhews Four ſeveral Cauſes of De- 

murrer : The Firſt whereof is, That the Plea I { 

is repugnant, and maniteſtly contrary in it ſell, d 

to plead Copyhold dimifibil ad voluntat Domini I uU 

a tempore cujus, &c, and then to plead, Er de. i 

Et deſeendi- ſcendibil” & que deſcender de Anteceſſore ad heredem I 
bil, &c. ut de jure bereditario Tenentium, wocat” Tenant 

Right. Defendant joins in Demurrer, and! 

Demu*, E: Judgment for the Plaintiff, %%, &c. for this 3 

Judic pro firſt Cauſe; but it does not appear that any i 

nf, &. Judgment is enter'd on the Roll, but that it ap- © 

pear'd by the Chief Prot honotar /s Book, that MI 

1 the Rule of Court was ſo, Vile 2 Lut. 1321 

1327, Cc. 923 a 

ly 

4! 


fell upon and bit his the Defendant's Dog, 


TRESPASS. 661 


J Vide 2 Lut. 1360. The Action was Treſ. Bar for killing 
pals for killing a tame Deer. Defendant * ren] _ 
pleads, that he was poſſeſs'd of 20 Acres for n. — 
a Term of Years, and being fo poſſeſs d the it to be ſo. 
Deer came upon the Lands, and he not know. 
ing the Deer to be tame, kill'd her, & . The 


Plaintiff demurs, . Eo q placitum predict attin- 


git ad General Exit), The Court inclined, That 


the Plaintiff ought to have averr'd in his Count, 

that the Defendant knew the Deer to be tame; 

for if he did not, they inclined he was excuſa- 

ble. But it was afterwards order'd, That the Plea De nove 
Declaration ſhould be amended, and that the 9rder'd. 
Defendant ſhould plead Non Cual to it. Id. 1361. 


f. Treſpaſs for killing his Maſtiff-Oog. The Bar, That he 


Defendant pleaded, That the Plaintiff's Dog Kkill'd che 
Plaintiff's 
which he kept for the Defence of his Houſe ; — 
wherefore, in Defence of his own Dog, he own Dog. 
kilfd the Plaintiff's Dog. Hereupon the Plain- 0 
tiff demurr'd, and the Plea was adjudg'd ill, Plea ill. 
becaufe he did not ſay, He could not otherwiſe 

ſave his own Dog, but by killing the Plaintiff's 

Dog, a Maſtiff being valuable. Secondly, It 

does not appear that the Plaintiff's Dog was 

uled to bite, nor that the Defendant's Dog 

was a Maſtiff, Vide 1 Lev. Rep. 216. & 

1 Saund. 84. Vide Thimp. 336. 

f. Vide 2 Lut. 1494. Treſpaſs for killing his Bar, That he 
Maſtiff. Dog at V. Bar, That he was Ferox, ok, the 
and uſed 9, Ho Men, Cc. and that he enter'd Dog bei, 
into his Yard at H. ſo that he dare not go out Ferox, nay 
of his Houſe for Fear, Cc. and fo juſtifies entring into 
with a Traverſe that he is Guilty out of bis his Yard. 
Yard. Rept, De injur* ſua propr. And Verdict Rep! & Julie 
and judgment for the Defendant, although it Pre Def”. 
was moved in Arreſt of Judgment that the 
Juſtification was ill. Id. 1495. 
| VV 3 dee 


W _ TRESPASS 


See more, Raſt, Ent. 606, 614, 219, 628, 
629. 630, 663, &c. Hern 510, 3 Brownl. 424, 
444, 452, 457, &c. Winch, Em. 984, 990. 
Bro. Red. 476, 496. Bro, Vad. 424, 426, 513, 
Thomy/. 343, Cc. 


Bar de Biens & By-Law, &ec. 


8 E proprietate bonorum per poſſeſſion 
— 15 1 & — Raſt. Ent. 614, 615, 
* 620, 632, 637, 653, 602. Ver, Intr, 122, 
© 189, 190. Winch. Ent, 1004. 2 Bro. 148, 
| © Thompſ. 369. 

Simile. . De proprietat' honorum per vendition', 
| © &c. Up' Bench, Preſ. 151, 193. Vet, Intr. 100, 
* Raſe. Ent. 619, 675. Thompſ. 308, 330, 339, 

401, 2 Bro, 139. Bro. Red. 489. 


Simile per J. De proprietate bonorum per donation 
Donation, * legation' & deviſation', &c. Vet. Intr. 5, 44, 
&c. * 100, Raſt. Ent. 637, 640, 641. Wineb. Em. 


© 1001, 1005, 
. 1 

_ . Per donation', Raft, Ent. 636, 637. 
— ; f Vet. Intr. 122. 158. Up. B. Pref. 199. a 
per Delibe- J. Per deliberation', Raff. 614, 615. 
ration”, I Bro. 322. 

mo. . Per impignoration', Up. B. Preſ. 191. 200, 
* ore Plaeit. Gen, 603. Rob. Ent. 667. | 
1 Per invention', & deliberation', pro cu- 
* * ſtod? pacis, &c. Raff. 629. Co. Ent. 61. 


Per Depre- C. Pei depredation' & inſecution', Raſt, 
dation”. © Ent. 646. | 


. © Bar de Uxore abducta, cum bonis, Vet. 
— II. 163. Raſt. Ent. 662. 2 Bro. 283. — 


1. Trans 


TRESPASS. 663 


c . © Trans pro aſportatione 10 Stan- Bar, Per Ber 
1 neorum, Bar per Litteras Paten' Ed. 4. dell Frater- 
? © © concefs hominibus Myſterii Sciſſor in Exon' —_— 
» * Guild', Er poteſtat' facere Ordinationes int” ture Warn 


of ſeipſos pro melior' gubernac' Fraternitat & pro opprobri- 
© fore corpus corporat', Qd' Ordinatio fuit oſo Sermone 
fact' ꝗd' aliqua perſona ejuſdem Fraternicat' — Magi- 
© que conviciaretur abuteretur vel uteretur aliquo ſtrum & Ju- 
c —_ þ 0 dic proQuer 
* Scurril ogg a Sermone erga Magiſtr & ſur Demar. 
* cuſtod*, &. Satisfaceret 3s. 4 d. ꝗqd' Quer' 


n ſuiĩt Cul' & non ſatisfecit per quod Def ut 
5 © Bedell Frater nitat', Virtute Warrant' Ma- 
2, © giltr* & Cuſtod' pro diſtriction* & vendi. 
8. | © tion), oſtio aperto cepir, &c. nomine diſtri. 


* ctionis pro eiſdem 35s, 4d. Quer' demurr', 
7 Et Judic' pro Quer', this By. Lam to levy by 
0. f Diſtreſs & Sale being illegal. 3 Lev. 276, Oc. 


9, . Vide 2 Lut, 1320, & c. Defendants juſtify Bar per By. 
| Caption & Aſportation de Biens per By Law de Law de les 
n les Taylers Civir' L. That if any Brother ſhould r Gs 
75 abſent at any convenient Dinner, he ſhould © 

u. pay ſuch Proportion to the Stock as the Maſter 


ſhould pay to his Dinner, upon Penalty to ſor- 
7. ſeit 3s. 4 d. wich Power to diſtrain; that the 
Plaintiff forfeited, and did not pay, Per quod, &c. 
Plaintiff demurs, and Judgment for the Plain- 
tiff, becauſe no Notice was given, nor preciſe 
Damand was of the fame Sum that the Ma- 
{ter had paid. | | 
. Treſpaſs for taking Forty Shoes, and Def“ juſtifies 
Twenty Pieces of Leather: As to Part, Defen. Per Stat. con- 
dants plead Non Cw”; and as to the Reſidue, erna Ten- 
they juſtify by Force of the Statute, 1 Car. 1. " 
. cap. 22. concerning Tanner (but the Act is 
miſrecited). The Plaintiff demurs, and Judg- 
ment was given for the Plaintiff upon ſeveral 
Exceptions; but whether for all, or which of 
: them in particular, 'cis not certainly ſaid. But 
| Vv4 it 


| 
* 


= 


N r n 8 4 * 
1 — —od ' ˙ꝛ . l! ̃ͤůṽ²⅛ͥwnuͥʃU ꝛͤ—dt! oa 
= PFC 
8 a n 


Rp A pn 5 

W-+ r » * p a = 2 ae 
7 , 

- pm ow Oe. e eng ere [Dl .. * — A. tt. 06 


EIT PIC, 
3 a 


3 2 2 — oF a4 1 * * 
5 — * 4 * =” 
— o Cie" 4. wth" — N 5 
—— ñ́—— UU — . · 22x22 


664 


* 


Jaſtification 
by Star. for 
Preſervation 


of Game. 


Q. If he 
__ to 
plead Speci- 
ally;” * 


vi & Armis, 
lena ſus, 
omitted in 
C. Þ. fed von 
allacantur. 


TRESPASS. 

it is noted to be reſolv'd in the Caſe of Faque: 
and Chandler, intrat Mich. 9 V. Rot. . in 
C. B. 1 7 57 — — a General Law. 
Similis Fuſtificat', RepÞ de injur ſua propr, C- 
Iſſue. Bro. Vad. 432. 1 TTS l 8 
. The Defendant in Treſpaſs juſtifies for en. 
tring his Houſe, and taking the Plaintiff's Gun, 
by Vertue of the Statute 22 & 23 Car. 2. cap. 2. 
for the Preſervation of Game. 2 Lut. 1502, 
1506. Where tis ſaid, That it ſeem'd the Ge- 
neral Iſſue might be pleaded in ſuch Caſe, by 
reaſon that the Defendants had acted by Force 
of a Warrant of Juſtice of Peace; but tis 
made a Quere, That if one meerly as a Game: 
keeper had taken the Gun, if he oughe not to 
plead ſpecially? And alſo a Ouære, That if a 
Hundred, with a Court-Leet, is within the 
Words of the Statute (Aanort, or other Royal. 


» ties)? For if it is not, chen (it ſeem'd to the 


Reporter) it ought to have been alledged that 
the Plaintiff's Houſe was wichin the Manor 
of W. M. the Manor of Sir 7. . for that 
the Gun was ſeized to his Uſe; and if it was 
within the ſaid Manor, or any other Manor 
of Sir F. V. then it was not to any Purpoſe to 
make any Mention of the ſaid Hundred and 
Court Leet. Idem 1506, Fn | 

L Brief in Treſpaſs for breaking his Cloſe, 
and the Doors, ad Velen, &c. and taking 
away his Goods, and Declaration to the ſame 
Effect, but omitted /i & Armis, and without 


faying Bona ſua. After a Writ of Inquiry of 


Damages awarded for Default of a Plea, and 
Return thereof, that was moved in Arreſt of 
Judgment, ſed non allocartur, becauſe ſuch Mat- 
ters are alledged in the Writ: And in'the 
Common Pleas the Writ is Part of the Count, 
and will make it good. 2 Lat. 1509, 1510. 


Bar 


TRESPASS ces il 


Bar de Eſcripts. 


"hy D' Pater Def” ſeir' de Manerio de- Od' Pater de- 
Ds dit illud Def & Ux' in Tallio, & dit Def” pixi- 
dedit ei pixidem cum chartis pro conſervacꝰ dem cum 
Status ſui inde. Rep'', Quod Pater dedit chartis. 0 
e illud Quer', Et travers qd' dedit Det”. 

| Raſt. Ent. 84. 

. Qd' Quer' non deliberavit ſcriptum 

© Def? inſpiciend”, & Demurrer inde. Per, 

| Intr, "eg | | 

f. * Proteſtand* qd' Quer' deliberavit Non Cul! de 
ſeriptum Def? deliberand' al' W. pro pla- dilaceratione. 
* cito ꝗd' non eſt Cul' de dilaceratione. Ver. 

( Intr, 20. | | 

. * Qd' non eſt Cul de dilaceratione, Simile 

Et travers qd” fuit obligat Quer' in aliqui- Traverſe. 
dus denar' ſummis. Bro. Met. Nov. 384. 

. The Defendant pleads, d' predicto ter. That he can. 
mino quo, c. the Plaintiff did deliver the In. celled the In. 
centure to the Defendant to be cancell'd; where. _— with 
upon he cancell'd it with the Plaintiff's Con- — 
lent. Rep? de nur ſua propr, C- Iſſue. Bro. Wap 
Vad. Mec. 467, 428. 


Sur Preſcription de Common. Vide poſtea 


; | Cuſtoms. | 
4 | 
> WL. 11 (I.) For violently beating of Bar per fon al 
W + his Cattle at R Bar per ſon Frankte- Franktene- Un 
f Wrment at S. Replꝰ de injur? ſua propr*, & Iſſue, ment. 1 
1 Ml.) For maintaining a like Treſpaſs in a ſe- & | 
H Neond Narr, Plaintiff pleads a ſpecial and in- | il 
Nricate Preſcription for Common in the Cloſe Al 
ard S. with neceſſary Averments according A! Bar per 4 
to the Preſcription; and to the Reſidue of the Preſcription. | 
Cattle in the ſecond Narration, he pleads De | | 

61 re rhe Ben ini | 

a 


3 r 


r e 8 8 
r 


656 


Repl' & De- 
mut'. 


2. de Judic. 


Bar per Coia' 
quibuſl'ber 
3 Aanis, &c. 


Bar pro Coia' 
per Burgens' 
Burgi, Et 
Que:' demur'. 


TRESPASS. 


injur” ſua propr?, and traverſes that the ſaid Cat. 
tle were Damage feaſant. Defendants demur 
ſpecially to the ſeveral Parts of the Replication: 
As to the Firſt, whereupon the Iſſue was join d; 
ſo to the Second, which is, for the Preſcription 
of Common ; and as to the Third Part, which 
is, that the ſaid Cattle were not Damage fea. 
fant. Vide 2 Lut. 1394, 1395, & 1398. Where 
it appears, that Judgment was given for the 


Plaintiff %, as in the Court Book; but the 
Reporter ſays, he was poſſtively inform'd by 


the Attornies of both Parties, that the Jud, 
ment pronounced by the Court was for the 
Defendants. Vide Doct. Demur. 334, 335, 336. 
J. Qd' Def ſeit' de terr' habuit Coiam 
in Campo unde, &c, pro 120 Ovibus qui 
buſlibet 2 Annis concurren” poſt blada meſſi 
quouſque rejeminentur & quolibet Anno 
quando jacet friſcus per tot? Ann' & poſuit 
oves, &c. Repl de injur' ſua propr”, & tra 
vers? preſcription'. Vide Winch. Ent. 981. 
I. Similis preſcription” pro Coia' pro Burgen 
Burgi de Derby pro omnibus Averiis ſuis co icalibu 
per quod, c. with an Averment that tis the 
ſame Treſpals, and traverſes any Treſpaſs a 
any Time after the Grain ſown, and before the 


a 0 - 


Corn was taken and carried in, &c. The Plain 


tiff demurs; and the Exception taken to the 


Plea was, That the Deſendant had juſtified the 


Treſpaſs upon the Firſt Day of Auguſt, Am 
20 Regis, and the Plaintiff had laid the Tre 
paſs primo April 21 Regis, fo the Plea agree 
not with the Time in the Narration, nor ſhew! 
any Cauſe wheretore ic did not agree, and tha 
the Traverſe was ill, alſo he had not travers 


the Pedibus ambulando omnio* : But upon the SB 


cond Argument, the Court held the Plea good 
enough in Subſtance ; for the Defendant 4 
= NN aven 


TRESPASS. 


werr'd in his Plea that it is the ſame Treſpaſs, 


667 


and the Plaintiff having demurr'd generally to No Advan- 


it, tis only Form, and not Subſtance, of which tage of Form 
no Advantage could be taken on a general on General 


Demurrer: And the Traverſe had well an- Demurrer. 


ſwer'd the material Part of the Declaration; 
for if at the Time of the Treſpaſs laid in the 
Declaration the Field was ſown, then he had 
tavers d it; but if it was not ſown, then it 


[, ppears by the Plea that the Defendant had 


good Right to put in his Cattle, and fo qua- 
cnque via data, the Defendant had juſtified or 


travers'd the Treſpaſs; wherefore Judgment Judic' pro 


was given for the Defendant. Vide 2 Saund, 2, Def 


374, Oc. Vide poſt ea. 


J. * Vide x Saund, 24, Qd' T. ſeit' de Ma- Bar pro Coia! | 


© nerio de W. habuit pro ſe & Tenen' Coiam' pro omni- 


0 52» 3 2a pt -» bus Averiis 
paſtur' in Chs' predict pro omnibus Aver * Coi'calibus 


8 ; * levan', and 
Ann ut ad Manerium pertin & appun · ſay; no! Com 


Cobicalibus infra Manerium levan' per tot 


ctuavit Def curam habere de Averiis ſuis 
in Coiam' impoſit', qui ut ejus Serviens in 
clo intravit ad vidend' Averia, (But he ſays 
not that he put them there, &. nor that they 
were levant and couchant.) Plaintiff demurs; 
and 'twas objected, That the Defendant had 
only ſaid that the Cattle were in the Place, but 
not that he put them there; and it appears 
that they were not the Defendant's own Cattle, 
andthen if he put them not into the Place, he 
is not culpable, for a Man cannot be guilty of 
a Treſpaſs with Cattle if they are not his own, 
or that he actually put them into the Place: 
And ſo the Defendant had juſtified the Treſ- 
7 with Cattle, and yet he had not conſeſs'd 
„ nor faid any Thing to that Purpoſe : And 
then the Plea being bad in Part, is bad in the 
Whole, although he had juſtified one Part * E 
" F; "2 * 0 


668 TRESPASS. 


That an in- for an intire Plea cannot be good in Part, and 
tire Plea can · bad in Part, becauſe ſuch an intire Plea is no 
nor be good deviſable: And judgment for the Plaintiff. A. 


— — ſo it's obſerv'd, That the not averring that 


ok the Cattle were levant and couchant upon the 
- 0 % Manor, was another Fault. Idem 27. of 


ff. Vide 1 Saund. $40, e. Where Defen Wl,» 


dant preſcribes for Common in Groſs for all 
yudic pry Cattle after the Corn carried in, c. But 
Aue“, for De- adjudged ill, becauſe it was not ſaid Levant and 


_ - Couchant, And this is alſo by one of the Bur. 


chant. geſſes of Derby. Vide ante. 


Bar for Common from the Time the Corn 
was carried in, and for the whole Near 


when the Field lay freſh. 


1 J. NJ ide 2 Lut. 1467, Cc. Narration for 
Auer, for not breaking his Cloſe, & Defendant 
ſhewing they pleads Common Bar, Nopel Aſſignment de Cl# 


. voc M, Bar que M. is a Common-Field in B 


le, hat and that one G. J. was ſeiſed of a Meſſuage, 
Crete a 25 Cc. in B. and that he, &c, Time out of Mind 


Specie. had Common of Paſture every Year, when 
the Field was ſown, from the Time that the 
Corn was carried in to the Time that it was 
ſown again, and in every Year in which it was 
not ſown, and laid freſh, for the whole Year: 
That in the Year in quo, Cc. it was ſown, &c. 
by which the Defendant, as Servant to the ſaid 
G. F. put in his Cattle. Plaintiff demurr'd ; 
and it ſeems Judgment was for the Plaintiff, 
becauſe he had not ſhewn that they were com- 
monable Cattle, or what Cattle in Spegie. 
Vide Thompſ. 338. Lev. Ent. 209. Simile, And 


Locus incloſed that the Locus in 2 was incloſed with Walls, &c. 
with Walls, per quod, Cc. Idem 219. 


de quo, 2 See 


| C 
f 
( 
f 


dee more, Raſt, Ent. 622, 623, 624, 625, 626. 
Va. Intr. 123, 154, 155. Co. Ent. 648, 656. 
1 Brownl. 174. 3 Brownl. 407, 418. 433- 


J. For Replications, de injur ſua prop”, Et Repp de In- 
traverſe Preſcription, Raſt. Ent. 622, 624, 625. juria ſua 
W Co, Ent. 649. 656. Vet. Intr. 189. 3 Brownl. propr.. 
1. 409, 437, 446. 2 Bro. 256,262,269. Thompſ.21 9, 
al 379. Winch Ent, 971, 977, 981, 1000, L002. 
ut W . Sur 2 Preſcriptions & travers inde. Sur 2 Pre. 


nd ih Reft. Ent, 618. Vet. Intr. 165. 3 Brownl, 407. ſeriptions, & | 


it WI Thompſe. 373. 374. Simile & 2 Demur' inde, Demurr'. 
Lev, Ent. 219. 

. © De Coia' paſtur* pro Cuſtumar* Tenen'” Bar per Cu- 
in magno Vaſto, 2 Browns Ext. 269. Simile, ſtumar' Te- 
* Winch. Ent. 971. Et in loco in quo cauſa Vi- nen. 

' cinagit. | 

. © Pro Cuſtumar* Tenen', ad certa tem- gimile. 
pora & pro certis Averiis, Except, &c. 
or Wl Pbompſ. 418. 
nt W . © Pro omnibus Averiis, per tot' Annum, Per tot An- 
0 Wl © Winch. Ent. 1000. num. 

B, W Fo © Pro 120 Ovibus, &c. Winch. Ent. 98 1. A Die « 
©, A Die ad Diem. Simile pro 37 Ovibus, Diem. 
d Wl Bron. 342. 
nl XS. © In Clo' pro omnibus Ovibus ſuper te. Per ta Am- 
e © nementa levan per tot Annum, Thomp/. 319, aum. 
35 Pro omnibus Averiis except' Ovibus a A Die ad 
Die ad Diem quolibet Anno, Rejo per Cu- Di:m. 
: © ſtum? ad fugand? Oves ad flumen cauſa la- 
* vandi, &c. Thomp. 324. 


. 
d J. pro omnibus Averiis Coi'calibus ſuper Rep per in- 
eenenta' levan' per tot Annum. Repl per cloſuc' & Def 


icloſure del Common, Et ꝗd' Def” habuer' _—_ ſul⸗ 


„ ſufficien communiam. Rejo' qd non, Et 
‚ " Exit' inde, Tbompſ. 352, Vide Robinſon 461. 

1 e Pro 
| 1 


TRESPASS 669 


=: ci 


— 
323 


a 
" PEEL p tn 
— — — —— Ai — —— 
Y A * z 
- — ——¾d — 


e 


* — _ amn * 1 - — 
4 - 4. 7 5 — - 
N „ e — * - Oo ng eo hr on oO EE ney ＋ . _— 7 2 Lent "II 


— — rg ot 
— + et — * 


* 1 N 8 . EDEN "INE: I * — 1 
y r ts hs — IS pt ad SO "IE IS - YE DIY =" 2 3 | . ; % * A * 2 
— - Wn s \ 5 2 n n 1 1 — — = 4 4 2 
— OY" OY > \ ; 4 Os 
I” oo eng” er . tt = % —0oc> m4 en Swi. Qi, 


— — — aa ge 


670 TRESPASS. 
A Die ad . Pro omnibus Averiis annuatim - a Die 


Diem. © ad Diem. Thompſ. 335, 3725379. 2 Brown. 262. 
© Fide 1 Brown. 341, 


PerDominum . © Pet Dominum Manerii pro omnibus 

Manerii, * Averiis per tot' annum, & a Coia' trans lo. 
* cum ad aquam vocat' E. gregem & armen. 
© tum ibid* aquand'. 1 Brown, 340. 

Pro Faldag? / Pro Liberty of Foldage when the Place 

quando, & c. lies fallow, &c. Bro, Vad. 423, Rep! de injur 


ſua propr”, and traverſes the Land lying fa. MI. © 


low. 


Simile. J. © Simile pro libertat? Faldag” & de paſtur 


c 


pro Ovibus, Similis Repl' & Travers. Iden 
"286 | 
Vide poſtea ſur Cuſtoms, 


De Eftovers. Vide de Arbres. 
ide poſtea Cuſtoms. 


Pro Focali in G. D' Def' ſeit' de Meſs” & terris, habuit 

Meſs'. * \_Zrationabilia Eſtoveria, pro focali in 
© Meſs, Repl' ꝗd' terra eft liberum tenemen- 

tum, Et travers' Preſcription', Up. B. Pre. 

225. 

Pro Sepimen⸗- J. d' Def ſeit' de Meſs & terris, habuit 

to & Focali. rationabil' Eſtover' in terris (except? de tali 
* bus arboribus) pro ſepimento & focali. Repl 
* de injur? ſua propr' & travers preſcrip ion, 
3 Brownl. 458. Simile, Tbompſ. 348. Simik 
* pro Focali in Meſs', Thompſ. 4 10. Winch Ent, 
1 

Pro Common . Quoad partem trans bar per Preſcrip- 

& Focali per © tion de Common, & quoad ſucciſion' Jam: 

Cuſtom, * norum, &c. Bar qd? iple ſeit' de Meſs ulis 
© fuit ſuccidere jampna & dumos ereſcen' in 
© terris de novo aſſign comburend' in Meß 


3 * ſeperal, 


* 
c 


„ſeperab, Rep! de injur' ſua propr', Et travers 
"I Preſcriprion'. 3. Brown!, 407. 

. © Cuſtom per Cuſtumar' Tenen' ſucci- Similepro ne- 
dere ſubboſcum in terris de novo aſltgn' pro ceſſar Focal. 
neceſſat Focal” infra Meſs' con:burend', Rep! 
de injur' ſua propr,, Et traverſe Cuſtome. 

2 Broun 273. 
„Def ſeit' de Meſs' & terris habuit Pro Repara. 


c 3 ' ix 
* i eſtoveria in boſco pro reparation” domu'm 75 . , & pro 
& ſepimencorum & pro Focali, Rep!” per ali, 


I liberum tenementum, Et travers' Preſctip- 
; MW tion?. Id. 277. T 

ſ. Qd' Def & omnes, &c. habuer' p,, gjivey 
Coiam' Paſture, Turbarie, fodition' terre & Co'iis. 

' eftoveriorum videlicet, &c. qd' fodit terram 
ſuccidit arbores ac herbam cum Averiis de- 
' paſt* fuit utend* Coia', 1 Brown. 341. 

. * Q& Def” ſeit' de Cottagio uſus fuit Pro Suceifion* 
ſuccidere bruer* creſcenꝰ in Clo? de novo Bruer' com. 
aſſign comburend' in Cottag', Rep! & Quer' burend' in 
c , 74067" HA" : 1 0 Cottag'. 

cogn* preſciption', Et travers qd' Def com- 
' buffit bruer' in & ſuper Cottag”. Thompſ. 318, 

. Qd' Def fuit cenens Cuſtumar' de jure Pro Succi. 
JTenen' Angl', Et qd' infra Maneriu' eſt Cons! ſion Arbor 
pro aliquo Tenen ſuccidere arbores ſuper reparand' 

( A » 1 9 . . horrea & 

tenementa creſcen* ad reparand' edificia & f 
s is ia horreum & ſepes fuer in de- 

epes, Et quia horreum & ſepes fuet' in de 


1 caſu Det* ſuccidit & cepit Arbores. Idem 

* c 329. | 

. T. Simile, Er qd quilider Tenens Cuſlu- Qn Def ce. 

E mar habuit mac emium ex aſſignac Domini HE te * 

e aut be ebe debe pro e eee 
paratione edificiorum, Et qd' Meſs exiſten' ſten' la 

F: in decaſu, & nullo macremio exiſten' aflign”, 


ah * Def” cepit & luper reparation' Mes' impen- 
„didit. Idem 375. 

in . 

eG : Bar 


, , , . - * 1 ew I __ l r - - R 
3 3 TS TL ANTE 7 . r ? Ry > 1 SHO 88 - 
WY _ " Da - = _ = \ n — F - : 
G — * 7 2 - < > * 4 
=> = __ 23 — —— — — 2 Go — Od KS > * 82 ve — 88 1 
— x . 
4 nt 


2 , r ” 
— A 
—— 


— 2 


as rx oo eg wr 
* ="< tw 


Is 
— wr EIS. 


2 

* a att — x 

2 OE” * = ot > $2 2 2 
— PU» Ü —˙ — U ÄͤͥAd oe Ä»ß̃ M ˙—¹.. Ü 


— 


— 


> 

wa a » — 1 
r 1 

Tas - < & a 1 


3 N mug; 
— * 


Pro afporta- 
tione deci- 
marum. 
Per viam 
Maxime ne- 
ceſſar. 


Pro via ad 
Eccleſiam & 
Mercat'. 


Pro fugand” 
& carriand'. 


Quis Quer 
fecit foſſata. 


Erexit jan- 
nam. 


De Via & 
Rep!' per ali 
am viam, 


Ad Eccleſi. 
a N. 


Pro via ad 
Regiam viam. 


TRESPASS. 
Bar & Juſtification de chat. 


f. * ND Def? intravit Clauſum & trat 

5 illud in Terras pro aſportatione De. 
© cimaruin, and avers, that there is no other 
* Way. Repl de injur ſua propr'. Hen 70g, 
© Vide eund 729. Qd' via' a mes ad Clauſum 
© fuit maxime neceſſar per Warrenafn. Vide 


inch, De Decimis & nulla alia via, 989 


6 : 

De via pedeſtr' & equeſter* ad Eccleſiam 
de E. & mercat' de M. Rep! de injur ſui 
* propr* & travers Preſctiption'. Raſt. Em, 
* 617. Vet. Intr, 21, Up. B. Pref. 186. 

. Pro via ad fugand' & carriand', Raf, 
„Ent. 618, Vet. Intr. 101. Rep! qQ' fat 
© ſeperal? ſolum & traversꝰ Prefcription'. Et 
© vide Vet. Int. i 65. | 

„De z. ſeperal' viis ad tres ſeperal' Cam: 
pos & Quer* fecit foſſata, &c. per quod, 
© &c. Pro via utend', Repl' de injur* ſua & 
* travers' vias. *Raff. 617. Vet. Int. 189. Quer 


© erexit januam per quod, 8c. Similis Repl 


& Travers?. 3 Brownl. 426, Vide poſtea. 

J. De via ad eund' equitand* fugand' & 
© carriant” a mes ultra placeam terre uſque 
© Regiam viam, Repl' per aliam viam, E 
* travers* Preſctiption'® Raf. Ent. 618, Vu 
© pro fugatione Averiorum. Thompf, 300 
© Simili pro carriagiis. Id. 326. : 

. © Pro via ad Eccleſiarti, Repl' de injur 
© ſua propr'. 3 Brownl. 441. 

. J. habuit viam ad Regiam viam, E 
© Def”. ſerviens utendo via conculcavit hot. 
© deum ſeminat? in via, Repl' de injur' fu 
* -propr'. 3 Brownl. 451. 


7. bill 


/ 


b a, 6. . , - RX oy. 


are 673 
Def fugayit juvencam in Clauſum Q@ fugavic 
« Quer dampn' facien' in Clo? Def. Rep! pro juveneamin 
via pro Tenet) Cuſtumar? Trans? Clam a N 
Def. Rejo'“ pro Maintenance de Bar, Et pr = Teen 1 
De. travers Preſeriprion” Hern 711. Vide Winch Cuſtumar'. 
tber 990. Pro Tenen' Cuſtumar' Trans locum 
og uſque ad litus Maris. 1 Brown. 339. Vide 
um Winch, Ent. 977, L093. 
ide J. Qd' Def? equicavic per medium Parci Pro via in 
in Coi' via Regia, Rep!” de injur* ſua propr', medio Parci. 
Et travers viam. Raft. Ent. 617. Up. B. Preſ. 
lam 1355 203. 
u d Def incluſit parcell' vie Regie cum neg juftif 
Ew © Haiis quas Def? equitando fregit & aſporta- cat ' fraftian? 
] vit, Repl per Liberum Tenementum Ger, poſtea, &c. 
uſt, Et travers qd' parcella vie Regie. Raſt, pro via. 
fur © Ent. 617. Vet. Intr, 122. Def? juſtificat 
Et \ Iracti ion* poſtium, &c. Etect' per Quer in 
i Via, Rep! & Travers Preſcription”. Bro, Vad. 
am 5109. Oc ſervien' Quer' exulſit haias, &c. 
od Pro via utend' Repl' & Travers, Winch, 
28 Est. 964. Simile in parcell' alte vie Regie. % 
ner * 1d. 10071. 
epl'll. „ © Qd' eſt Communis via Regia, voc Per coem 1 


H. Trans“ Clauſum uſque villam ad eund* & — Regiam 
rans'. Claus 


* equicand”*. Up. B. Pre/. 18 

5 © Coils - 24 King Trans Clauſum — — 

' ulq ue ad molendinum, &c. Winch Ent. 967. ad molendi- 
© Qd' eſt Cois' via pedeſtris, &c. Moo. num. 

e * 684. Via pedeſtris pro omnibus Inhabitan' Pro coi vis 
ad Eccleſiam. Thomp, 412. Simile ad anti- 
uam Domum. 14. 414. Pro omnibus Li- 
eis, &c. Bro. Vad. LF Def habuic viam 
* pedeſtrem Trans', Uſque, &. Rep! 

& Travers. Thom 17 399, Quer' cog 
* viam ſed qd' Def Ciauſam fregit extra viam. 


* Thompſe 297. 
"1 4 X x ſ. Qs 


” i 


pedeſtc.. 


674 TRESPASS. 


pro eo ſe» . © Qd eſt Cois' ſemita pro omnibus pe- 

mita. © deſtribus Trans Clauſum in quo, &c. Repf 
* q& Def? ivitextra ſemitam. AP. 446, 514. 
© Moo, 257. Qd' fuer 3 Communes vie 
* pedeſtr', Rep! proteſt' qq' non, pro placito 
© q& Def ivit extra vias. Rejo' qd' fuer*, Et 
© Travers extra vias. 2 Brown. 255. Similis 
Bar Repl' & Iſſue pro x via. Rob. Ent. 458, 
© Vide poſtea. 

Pro via tm . © Pro via tam pedeſtr quam equeſtr' per 

pedeſtr quam © venellam, &c. quando campus A. jacet fri 

equeſtr”, &c. cus & poſt blada aſportat' quouſque reſemi. 
© nat', &c. Rep! de injur' propr', Et Tra. 
© vers Preſcription'. Thomp/. 382. 

Pro via Singlis' Annis poſt falcacon' herbe 
© uſque qd? ver?, &c. Similis Repl' & Travers, 
© 1 Brown, 347. W. ſeit' habuit viam, quando 
cla' non ſeminarent', dimiſit J. Et Def u 
© ſerviens haias ibidem erect evulſit, &c. Winch. 
* Ent. 964. | 

Juſtification , De via tam pedeſtr ee equeſtr ad 
of breaking fugand' & refugand' Averia ſuper mes levan, 
down Poſts, © &c, 2 Brown. 284. Thomp. 405, 416. Pro 
Cc. Pro vis. © ſypatione aver” & pro carriagiis, Et proſtrz 

| * ver” poſtes erect', Et Averia tranieundo 
© raptim momorder* herbam, &c. Repl & 
© Travers. Thompſ. 298. Bro, Red, 02. 
2 Brown, 248, Qd' Quer“ erexit 2 porta 
© extrinſecas in via Regia ita qd” nulli pertran- 
© fire ſeu equitare potuer? per quod' Def? equi. 
© tand & utepd' via portas fregit, &c. Repl 
© qq& Def? ſuit ſeit” de 20 Acr? terre quouſque 
© Def' fec' Trans, Et travers' Preſcription' 
© 1 Brown, 339. Cuſtom perambulaconis, 
Et Quer' obſtruxit viam per quod, Quer 
Demurr'. Idem 349. 


Pro via, pro . Qd' eſt Communis via a villa de E. 


fugacon 


Averiotum, Trans Clauſum uſque Communes Campos 
Oc. | e pro 


* * 1 — 
7 P 


TRESPASS. 675 
pro fugatione Averiorum & Carriag', &c. 
y c 
l Thompſ. 371, 403, 344. 5 
/ Def' ſeit' habuit viam pro fe & Carriagiis Pro via pro 
ie * ab alta via Regia uſque, &c. Et retrorſum, ſe & cariia- 
5 © Repl* & Travers' Preſcription. Winch. Ent. 55, Oc. 
974. 
s . Qd' H. ſeit' dimiſit Clauſum & viam Qd' H. ſeit 
8. © patri Def* qui aſſignavit Def” qui pro via gimiſit Claus, 
* dejecit ripam, &c. Repl' de injut' propr”, 8 
er Et travers' le Seiſin. Thompſ. 314. 5 
. © Qd' Def ' ſeitè de molendino habnit pro po via aq 
© ſe Firmar' & Sectatotibus ad molendinum, molendin“ & 
[2-W coem' viam tam ad molendinum quam a a molendin', 
* molendino trans Clauſum Quer' uſque ad &eœ. 
* villam de B. per omnibus carriagiis & ſic re- 
* trorſum, Repl qd' R. ſeit' de clo? dimiſit 
* Quer”*, &c. Et travers Preſcription', Et Iſſue 
* inde. Vincb. En, 1011. | 
. © Quer' pater Def? ſeit' in feodo con. Where the 
* ceflit Quer' liberam libtat in Atrio & Domi- Pefendent 
* cilio, liberas & communes vias & paſſag' _ _ 
ingreſs egreſs & regreſs ad ducend' aliqua joo d or 
* catalla ſeu carriag* per Atrium & Domicil' nail'd. 
* predict” ꝗd que ipſe tranſiturus fuit per viam 
& paſlag' predict', Et quedam Janua ex 
* tranſvers' vie & paſſag' affix' fuit per quod 
* anuam predict' tregit, &c. Repl qd' non 
* eſt idem reſid' de quo ipſe querit', Et Det 
Demurr'; And it was ſaid for the Plaimiff, 
* that he could not juſtify the pulling down and break 
ing the Gate, not having ſhewn that it was lock d 8 
© or nail d, ſo that be could not paſs, But per Per Cur, it 
* Cur”, having pleaded that the Gate was put — 8 
there, that he could not uſe his Paſſage, it fuld ö 
be intended lock d or nail'd, or the May ſo ſt rait. 
* ned by it that he could not paſs, and that the 


EN © Plea was good ; and the Replication being ſo ge- 
— : eg © neral, 
pro ” 


d F 


> OE Ye Fo 5 r 


676 


If by Unity 
of Poſſeſſion 
the Way is 
deſtroy d, not 
being re- 


&rv'd, &c. 


ESA 
© neral, is ille and vain; and fudgment way 
© given for the Defendant, Vide 3 Lev. 88, 92. 


fe. Vide 2 Lut. 1487, &. Defendant juſtifies 
for a Way, where there was Unity of Poſſeſ. 
ſion, and Alienation of Part; That there was 
no other Way only the Clofe in quo, &c. and 
that the Way was uſed after the Alienation, 
per quod, c. and fo juſtifies the Trefpaſs. 
Plaintiff demurs, and three Exceptions were 
taken to the Plea; x. That the Juſtificacion of 
throwing down the Hedges was not any Juſtt: 
fication of ſpoiling them, Sed non allocatur, ſot 
when a Hedge is thrown down, it is ſpoil'd as 
to the being of a Hedge. 2. That by the Unt 
ty of Poſſeſſion, the Way (if any was before) 
was wholly deſtroy'd, not being reſerv'd by 
the Seller at the Time of the Sale of the 
other Cloſes, and ſhall not be revived or re. 
ſerv'd by Implication of Law; and ſeveral 


Not where it Books are cited Sed non allocatur, for it is made 
is a Way of apparent by the Plea, that it is a Way of Ne 
Neceſſity, & ceſſity, Et eſt pro bono publico, that the Land 


pro bono pub- 
lico. 


Preſcription 
in Bar. 


Bar as a 
Pariſhioner 
for a Way 
thro? ehe 
Plaintiff's 
Cloſes. 


be not unoccupied. 2 Sid. 39. 3dly, That it 
was not ſhewn how, or by what Conveyance 
the other were conveyed over, Sed non allocs 
tur, for the Defendant is a Stranger to that, 
and Judgment for the Defendant per tot Cur, 
Id. 1489. | 

. Vide 2 Lut. 1426, G. A Preſcription 
for a Way pleaded in Bar of (ſeveral Trek 
paſſes. 

J. Idem, 2 Lut. 1506. Narr. for breaking 
his Cloſes at V. H. Bar, For that he is a Pa 
riſhioner and Inhabitant of B. V. and that 


they, Time out of Mind, have had a Way 


from B. V. in and thro' the Cloſes in quibus, 
c. uſque ad W. predict'. Iſſue is — 
tg 


"I 


* 


TRESPASS. 677 


the Preſcription, and Verdict and Judgment 
for the Defendant, altho' it was objected in 
Arreſt, 12 8 it was an impoſſible Preſcription. 
d 1508. 

. Narr. for breaking his Cloſe. Bar by a For Ingreſs 
Preſcription of Ingreſs, &c. to repair a Wear to repair a 
belonging to a Mill. Rep”, That the De- Wear. 
ſendant had extended the Wear beyond the 
uſual Place, and Iflue thereupon. Vide 2 Lur. 

JI. | Te 

1 Vide 2 Lut. 1526. Treſpaſs for breaking Preſcription 
his Cloſe, called the Fold. Bar, That one ww 
NB. was ſeized in Fee of a Meſſuage, Cc. not faying in 
And that he had a Way by Preſcription from whar Vill. 
the common Way, call'd /. in B. thro? the 
Cloſe of the Plaintiff to the Fold of the ſaid 
N.B, next adjoining to the Meſſuage of the 
ſaid N. in B. and that he demiſed it to D. for 
21 Years, a die dat Indentur predict, and fo 
juſtifies as Servant to the ſaid D. Demurrer 
mde, and Judgment for the Plaintiff upon an 
Exception, That it is not alledged in what 
Vill the Fold was; and allo it is ſaid, 4 die dat 
Indentur” predi, whereas no Indenture was 
alledged before. Id. 1528. 


Bar, G. De Incloſures. 


' hy D' Quer' eſt ſeit' de Clo' & Def” gar qd De. 


7 ſeit? de Clo? adjacen', Et Def* de. fecit ſepes 
bet facie ſepes int Cla', Et Det” fecit ſe pes ſufticien', 
ſufficien quas Quer' dirupit, per quod Ave- 

* ria intraver'. Rep! de injur” propr. Raft. 
* En, 620, | | 
f. © Qd' Quer? debet facere clauſur?, Repl' Bar qd' Quer 


J © qd fuer? bene fenſat, Et averia Det” adeo debet facere 


* fortia qq* ſreger ſepes, Et qq* predict T. R's — 
deblit facere aliam fenſur” 24 perticat 


3 


8 R que 


678 TRESPASS, 


e que fuer irreperat' per quod Averia per 
© eaſdem intraver'. Rezo' qd' dict' Clauſum 
© Quer' voc' N. fuit inſuffienꝰ foſſat? & exit 
£ inde, Et qd' predict” 24 perticat' fuer” bene 
© reparat', Et exit inde: ' Raſt. En. 621, 
Bar per Pre- ſ] * Preſcription” qd Quer uſus ſuit claudere 
ſcription' ſur © clauſum. RepP de injur propt', Et travery 
Quer. Rep" © Preſcription” de Incloſure. Raſt. Ent. 621, 
& travets : et. Intr. 122, 123. Up. B. Preſ. 194. 


Bir qd' Quer. . Qd' Quer' debet reparare, Et averiz 


debet repa- in deſcu' reparacon intraver? Clauſum Quer 

rare, Et Repl' © diverſis vicibus, Et Def ea recent infecut 

d' non. © eff, qualibet vice & ea reſugavit, Repl qd 

| * Quer'non uſus fuit reparare 6 perticas. Raf, 
Ent. 622, 


Similic Ber ff. * Q& Quer' debet reparare ſepes, Et 


qd' Quer' de- Averia pro deſcu' intraver', Repl' q' ſepes 
ber 1 Quer' fuer” bene reparat' quouſque Aveti 
Kt 4 Def ferocia & indomita eas freger', Et 


travers' qd ſepes fuer” frat'. 3 Broun 
469. Simile per Tenen' Cuſtumar' q 
Quer' debuit facere ſepes, Repl qd' Averia 
Det' fuet' indomita & freger ſepes. Hen 


quouſq; & c. 


TT oo i Ye Oh 


797. 
Similis Bar, /. © Qd' Quer' debet facere ſepes Repl' d. 
Er Rep de © jnjur? ſua propr', & Iſſue. 1 Brown. 3 40. Rib. 
8 En. 465, Thompſ. 304, 308, 342, 361. Wink 
ak En. 996, 999. cum travers. Hanſ. 213. 
Sizzilis Bar, . Qd' Quer' & omnes occupatotes ul 
—— © fuer? reparare fenſur? int? cla', in quarum 
deſcu' averja eyaſer', &c. Hern. 721. Thom. 
301. 


* 


Similis Bar f. © Qd' Quer' debet facere ſepes erga Ref 


& qa Def? © piam viam, Et pro deſcu' Averia Det? eva 
. * fer? in cla', Et Pet” pro rechaſiatione in 
How, 1 © ſecur' ſuit eadem in cla', Rep! de injur prop!) 


d-*; 3 


Et travers' qd* ſepes fuer' irreparat', Hen 
728. Thomy). 296, 397. Rob, Ent. 4g. 
| 75 0 N 


r OE... 


4 


TRESPASS. 679 


er . Qd' Def eſt ſeit de clo? adjacen' clo Bar per Pre- 
Quer', Et divis' tantum ivul i per ſeription de 
im „Et divis tantum per rivulum, qui per Nine 
ir Preſcription? fuit diviſio int” cla, Et qd' Ave- Clas & aye. 
ne © ria Def nataver? trans rivulum, Et ipſe ea tia natavet 
| refugavit 3 Repl' qd? Quer fuit ſeitꝰ de Clo? trans), &c. 
re Ml © quouſque Def? de injur' propt' fec? tranſgr*, Rep! & Tra- 
Et cravers' qd? rivulus eſt defenſio int” cla”. verſe, 
21 . 439. ali yor. 
f. © Qd' Def? ſeit' de clo! adjacen' clo' Qd' Quer 
ri: Quer & de una Vivaridica ſepe dividen' ſuecidit ſe- 
er © Clauſum Quer? & Def' Quer partem ſepis P*m per 
ur * fuccidit & proſtravit per quod Averia Def quod, &c. 
at © in Clauſum Quer* eſcapiaver' & Demurr' 
M1 i nde. 1 Brown. 354. 
f. Qd' Clauſum in quo fuit parcell' cois' par per de- 
Et Campi & per Quer' incluſum fuit e reſid' falt Quer 
pal Campi, Et Quer' & alii Occupatores uſui & al' repa- 
u © fuer” reparare ſepes, Def ſeir de Cuſtumar **** * Fe 
EM Mes & Terris habuit coiam? in coi” Campo Da 8 
vn. pro omnibus bidentibus per tot' annu' qui Def* habuit 
q poſuit bidentes, Et quia ſepes non reparat” coiam', &c. 
mn evaſer' in clo'. Thompſ. 332. Vide Mo. Iutr. 
ln 387, Cc. Repl' de injur' propr.. 
. Quer' debet claudere Clauſum prox' Od Quer 1 
4M © Clo'in quo Def? habuic Coĩam' pro omnibus debet clau- j 
„ © Averiis per tot annu', Et pro defcu' fenſur? dere Clau- bl 
„ch © Averia Quer' evaſer'. Winch. En. 996. ſum, &. 
f. © Simile poſt blada aſportat' quouſque Simile poſt 
uu © Campus reſeminaret'. Bro. Red, 503. Simile blada aſpor- 
un © placitum ; Rep! proteſt? qd' Det” non habuit — quouſq; 
„ Coiam' pro placito de injur propr?, Et tra- 3 be 
c > 54. » 7 0 
vers qd ſepes fuer frat? & Iſſue. Win. En. | 
Re. © 1006. if 
V4. J. 2 Tut. 1355, & 1358. Judgment by De- That the ii 
in fault, as to part of a Treſpaſs againſt one of Plaintiff 1" 
pr the Defendant's ; as to the Reſidue the others ought ro re- it 


Jert plead, T hat the Plaintiff was ſeized in Fee of pair, 6, 


| . fendant having Common in the Field ad joining. "i 
Q $ % * 4 the 9 


ll. 


3 


— 


— 7 „ 
— — — * = a 
So, | * * ” 
2 2K A F TN rea >, TU agatnr oy ng mage 


Fane ib, ee 24S, 3 ; — . 
* 


The Cattle 
eſcaped for 
want of In- 


cloſure, Cc. 


Repl!' de in- 
jure, & tra. 


verſe the 


Eſcape modo 
& forma. 


Demurt & 
Judic' pro 
Quer', ' 


Preſcription 


&c. 


Similis Bar 

& fecit Pro- 
clam”, Repl 
& Traverſe 


Preſcription', 


&e. 


the ſaid Cloſes, and that the Cloſe. called g. 
adjoin'd to a Common Field in S. and F. cal. 
led the Common; That the Plaintiffs, Time out 
of Mind, had repair'd the Fences ; That the 
Defendant H. was ſeized in Fee of the Manor 
of S. and that they, '&c. Time out of Mind, 
had Common of Paſture in the ſaid Field, c, 
Whereupon they put in their Cattle in the ſaid 
Field, and they eſcaped into the Cloſes in the 
Narr. for Default of Incloſure, whereupon they 
ſeveral Times entred to chaſe them out, & 
Repl de injur' ſua propr, with a Traverſe of 
the Eſcape modo & forma. Demurrer to the 
Replication, and the Bar adjudged ill, Idem 
1359. for the Court held it ſo, becauſe the Pre- 
ſcription for Common was not for Cattle Le. 
vant and Couchant ; but that the Traverſe of 
the Eſcape of the Cattle for Default of Inclo- 
ſure was good: But then it was objected, That 
the Treſpaſs ſuppoſed by the Wrie is in the 
Time of King Fames, for it concludes contra 
pacem ſuam, and the Treſpaſs in the Declaration 
is ſuppoſed in the Time of King Charles the 
2d; and that there was held a material Vari. 
ance, as by the Books cited: But after the 
ſhewing the Writ it ſelf, che Plaintiff had 
Judgment. 


Bar, G. De Waifs & Eſtrayt. 


| L. Efendant juſtifies for an Eſtray by Pre- 
for an Eſtray, 


ſcription, Nowe! Aſſignment, & non 
Cul! inde, Raſt. Ent. 579. Vet. Intr. 154. 

F © Simile & fecit proc in 2 Villis Mercs 
© roruis per 2 dies, Et qd Quer' non ven ad cla: 
© mand” infra Annum & Diem, Repl de in. 
© jur' ſua propr*, Et travers' Preſcription. Raf, 
Em. 638. Vet. Inir, 190, Up. 8. Pref,.192. 


q 


K K  ® Ob 


on oe ow Sw. £2 2 nor ill a> 


__ — . FRI mo — AM! WF © 7.) 


TRESPASS 68x 


© Ft Def? ſeit' de Manerio habuit Extrahur', 
c. Simile & obtulit deliberare equum Quer | 
© ſuper clam' qui recuſavit accipere illum, 1 
Repl' de injur' propr'. Af. 447. al: 515. 

Vvide 1 Brown, 344. Et fecit proclam' in 

© Mercatoriis, &c. Et vide Tbompſ. 420. 

. Qd' Def Decennarius per conſuetud' Def” ut De- 
Manerii cepit pullum equinum ut extrahur', cennarius 
Et quia fuit ferox tenuit eum compeditat', It ut 7 
Demurr' inde. 1 Brownl. 169. Bro. Red, * 
„ 
| 7 Defendant juſtify for a Horſe ſtolen, Defendane 
and waiv'd infra Honorum. Rep!', That the juſtifies for a 
Bailiff of the Hundred followed the Thieves, Horſe waived 


wp ey 
— a” i » 
— —— — — _—— * 
— — * — — - - 


— — 


— > — —— EEE T © 


N 
n - — 


3% 3 5 8 2 heb — 5 of - 
r r IR. 


1 3 
— — — 


and took them and the Horſes within the Hun. = — * 
dred, and traverſes that the Horſes were waived. the Thieves we 


Raſt, Ent, 682. Vet. Inir. 123. Simile de ovi- and Horſes 1 
bus furat C waiviat, Rep! qd Quer recent were taken 
inſecut eſt predict R. & recepit oves extra cuſtod . = 
ſuam & fuit poſſeſs quouſque trans, Et traverſe 3 

vai vure. Raſt. 683. 

. That King Charles the Second was ſeized Juſtification 
in Fee of the Manor of H. in the Right of the by Grant of 
Dutchy of L. and by Indenture under the — 
Dutchy Seal granted to F. S. all Eſtrays with- Seil- 
in the ſaid Manor for 31 Years, by which he 
was poſſeſſed of all Eſtrays, & c. That the 
Executor of the Executor of the ſaid J. S. 
being poſſeſſed, Cc. Fuvenca predif ven infra 
Manerium per quod, Cc. Demurrer general, and 
an Exception, That the Indenture under the 
Dutchy Seal was not produced; Sed non alloca- 
tur, upon a General Demurrer, yet Judgment Demurr*, 
for the Plaintiff, for that the Plaintiff declares and Judg. 
De una vacca, and the Detendant juitifies De ment pro 


Tuvencg, which is a Heifer that never had a Quer quis 


EW A e e * A4 * 
Calf, /and they are always diſtinguiſh'd in m_ — M 
of | | Pleading, Juvenca. ; 1 ut 


1 


682 


giftcation L. 
Fal the beſt 
Anchor and 
beſt Cable by 
Cuſtom. 


Licence. 


Cuſtom. 


Qd' Que 
fuer fugan' 
in Warrena 


Def”, &c. 


Qd' Def ut 
Warrenat' 
ſe defendit. 


Cuſtom. 


Juſtification 
for hunting 
of Badgers. 


TRESPASS. 


Pleading, and therefore the Bar does not an. 
{wer the Declaration. Vide 2 Lat. 1353, 1 355. 


Bar, Ge. De Wreck 


"1 Ide Raſt. Ent. — 


V Vi de py Ent. 4, &c. Defendants 
"of by a Cuſtom Fra \ Lord of the Ma- 
nor, for the Conſervation of the Sick, and the 
Burial of the Dead caſt on Shoar, and Preſer. 
vation of the Goods uſed to have the beſt An- 
chor, and the beſt Cable of every Shipwreck, 
Quer moratur in Lege, Oc. 


Bar, &c. De Warrens & Hunting. 


EE Ide Raſt. Ent. 650. Per Licenc' dat 

, fugare in Warrena, Repl' qd” non, 
ff. * Per Cuſtom fugare in Warrena. 
x Brownl. 175. 


* Qd Quer' ſuer' ſugan' in Warrena Det”, 
Et Det” cepit retia dampn' ſacien' in Warre. 
na & inſequebat' Quer & al in Clo? adja- 
cen' ad eos cognoſcend', .Rep!l' de — 
propr”, Et travers' qq fuer fugan' in Warre- 
na. 3 Brownl. 421. 
. © Qd' J. ſeit de Warrena antiqua fec 
© Def*' Warrenar ſuum, Et qd' Quer' in 
© Warrenam intravit & inſult? fecit in Def: 
© qui in executione Officii ſe defendit, Et tra- 
* vers qd' eſt Cul' in alio modo vel alibi extra 
B. Vide Thompf. 397- 

. © Cons' in Com' pro omnibus cuſtodien 
Canes venari lepores. 1 Brown. 335. 

. Noarr' de Clo fract', &c. Bar gd” in alio 
© Clo' invenit 2 Badgers quos venat?. fuit in 
* Clauſum de novo aflign', in quo fuer xecre- 


4 nat, 


c 


c 
c 
c 
* 
0 


. 


mes „ — 111 rr TY rad 


aw. ub e .£Aa- ES | nin. ca w Ws & > > 


iir a 


© nat', Et Def? eos ibm' e latibulis & antris 
* fodiit & occidit, que eſt trans', &c. Bro, 
Red. 483. 1 Brownl. 191. 


Bar, Gc. De Chaſes. 


' E Pannagio Porcorum pro Epo, &c. Pannage. 
18 Raſt. Entr. 664. Vet. Intr. 188. 

/. * Q& Epus' ſeit' de Chaſea extenden' in Epus' ſeit de 
locum in quo, &c. proſtravit palos ibm 1 ales mo 
* erect”, Rep! de injur* ſua propr', Et travers Rep! & Tra. 
* qq' Chalea extend' in locum in quo, &c. vers. 

* Raſt. 663. Vet. Intr. 187. 

[. Treſpaſs for killing two Hunting Dogs. 

Bar by Juſtification, for that the ſaid Dogs That the De- 
chaled the Deer in his Park or Chaſe, and fendants 
kil'd one Deer in the ſaid Chaſe: Whereupon kill d the 

the Defendants, as Servants of E. T. Mil. and — __ 
by his Command took the ſaid Dogs, and in for 8 
Preſervation of the Deer kill'd them. Rep?, tion of the 
That the Deer was out of the Chaſe in the Deer. 
Plaintiff's Land Herbam paſcen' : Whereupon 

he incited the Dogs to chaſe her out of his xn, The 
Ground; and they purſued the Deer into the Dogs purſued 
Chaſe, and there kill'd her, Ab/que hoc qd' Canes the Deer out 
pred* fugaver Damas predict vel Damam predict 3 _ 
vecider? aliquo alio modo. The Defendant de- into whe 
murs, and Judgment for the Defendant, 3 Lew. Chaſe, and 
25, & 28. For upon the Argument it was ad- there kill'd 
judged, That the Replication was ill, becauſe her. 

he did not ſay, that he did his Endeavour to 

ſtop the Greyhounds at the Side of the Park, 

to hinder them from entring into the Park: 

But then jt was objected, the Bar was ill; for 


altho' j was ngt lawful to chaſe within the Judgm=*n- 
e 


Park, et when the Defendant had taken the pro Def” ſur 
G;eyhopnds he ought not to have killed them; 7. 
7 and 


2 
A MW 


— äNQ77—ä— xf: — — Dſàn—— —U—ͤ— 
_ 
— — — 


2 — ä — ———ä—ä — — ̃¶ Q q G— 
—— wo — 


—U— — — 


8 
= ou $— —ů — — — 


— 


on —— 7 
r eo 


684 TRESPASS. 
and for that, cited Roll. 2 Abridg. 567, Lewis 
Caſe. But on the contrary was cited 2 Cro. 44. 
Waghurf# vers Dam; and at another Day, upon 


Conſideration of both the Books, Judgment was 
given for the Defendant. 


Bar, Ge. De Fairs & Marhets. 


ab Def? ce. . DE Tolneto pro quolibet Stallo erect 

pit pannum f in Feria, Et Def* cepit pannum 

pro Tolneto * pro Tolneto, Repl' de injur' propr” & tra- 

in Feria. : vers preſcription', 1 Rrownl. 178. Bro. Red, 
479. 

Pro Tolneto _ 6 De Tolneto de Emptore Averiorum in 


in villa tent' · Villa tent? in feodi Firma de Rege, Et Ballivi 


deRege, Ec © ceper' equ veriorum ibm' 
Def pet <« P quum pro Tolneto Averior m 


* empt' pro Quer?, Et pet' Auxilium de Rege. 
—_— 1 2 & av oſtea, . 
d proſtra= . © Narr' de Stallo broſtrar & al erect 
vic; ſtallum Def juſtifie pro proficuis Ferie fur dimile 
_ ere- © ſibi fact per Dominum Manerii, Et qd 
Mo Fee tempore Ferie proſtravit ſtallum Quer' & 
nn erexit alium pro uſu Ferie, Rep! qd Cim 

8 eſt liberum tenementum Quer & Def” de 
injur* propr' ſecit trans, Et travers qd' Clm' 
eſt parcella Manerii. 3 Brown. 415. 


Qdꝰ cepit pec' , De pecia Corii capt' pro Tolneto pro 


Corii pro Stallag in Feria inſolut', Repl' qd*Quer' ut 
Tolnet'in * tenens Terrarum de Antiquo Dominico Co- 
Feria: - © rone fuit acquit a ſolutione Tolnet' pro Boni 
— * ex proficuo terrarum provenien? in omnibus 
in antiquo * Feriis per totum regnum, Repo" per mainte 
Dominico. * nance de Barr', Et travers' ꝗd' pecia Corll 
f © fuit de proficuo terrarum Quer' in Villa de 

* A. tent de Antiquo Dominico & Iſſue 


© Thomp|. 302. * * 
4. 


J. Qd' Def” ut) Ballivus Manerii Spado- Qd' cepit 
nem cepit pro non ſolutione Tolon eo qd Spadon pro 
Quer' in Villam agitavit cum Spadone ſex _—_ "A 

© modiis tritici onerat', Tbompſ. 345. 

/ © Q& Def? per Cons antiqui Burgi ce. Cepit granum 
* per” 20 partem cujuſlibet modii grani vendit' per Cons an- 
© vel vendend' indu& in Burgo ill. Id. 386, £92 Burgi. 

. © Def' impoſuit' Crates in Mercato per Impoſuit Cra- 
* preſcription” pro ovibus in mercato venditioni tes in Mereat 
| © expoſuic, &c. que eſt trans, Et travers qd* Per preſcrips 
' eft Cub' aliter vel alio modo. Id. 420. VIS: 

. Defendant juſtifies, as Ale-taſter, to cut Def ' jaſtifies 
Butter in a Market, within the Manor, for as Ale. taſter. 
want of Weight. Er Demurr inde, Lev, Ent. 

215, Oc. 
_ f. Defendant juſtifies taking Hats for Stal- Treſpaſs ar 


lage of a Hatter, in a Fair held by 2 E G. in Saſſer, 


at Gombridge in Kent, becauſe the Plaintiff re- AY 
fuſed to pay, que eſt eadem, Cc. Abſq, hoc, that ge mp codem, 


be is guilty of taking out of the ſaid Fair. and travetſes 

ile WW The Plaintiff demurr'd ſpecially, Quia placitum the Place, 

d vedict' non reſpondit narrationem, (the Treſpaſs — | 

& being laid at Eaſt Greenſted in Suſſex.) And it — thy” 

m' WW vas argued, that the Traverſe was not good, Time. 

de becauſe he traver'd not at another Time, as 

m' well as another Place. But by the Court, the 
Concluſion, Que eſt eadem, with a Traverſe of 

X70 {Wan another Place, is good, without traverſing 

ut ol another Time. And Judgment was given 

bor the Defendant. Vide 3 Lev. 224, 227. 

nis MW / Treſpaſs for taking of Twenty Meaſures Defendane 

bus of Malt at C. Barr, of the Incorporation of 5. 5 

ne the City of Briſtol, and a Market granted, and g c 

ori {reaſonable Toll to be appointed by the May- 

& Nor, &c. And juſtifies for ſuch Toll, and tra- 

Tus verſes that they are guilty at any Place out of 

Ide ſaid City. Rep?, That he is a Burgeſs of neh Bunge 
T. and chat King Edward the Third granted of T and A ; 


Qd do Toll-free. 


Lett ning „ 
1 th a 
o * 
d 


* _—_— "x 


686 TRESPASS. 


to them to be quit of Toll through the Realty 
Rejo' by a Sur- Rejoinder, That the Bailitfs, Cc. of T. ſurren. 


render of Li- der'd to King James the Second all their Li. 


berties by the berties, C Whereupon the Plaintiff demurs, 


— and Judgment for the Plaintiff, for thatno Toll is 
mn pro due by the Law only for Goods fold, if not by 


gur. a ſpecial Cuſtom. Vide 2 Lut. 1329, &c. 


That the De» . Treſpaſs for taking his Spiced Cake, 
fendanr, a a Bar, That within the City of London there is 2 


Foreign. Ta. Cuſtom to elect and ſwear, yearly, Six Free. 
ker of the 


— b Takers, to overſee all Spiced Caſes and Bread 


London, took brought to the Common Markets by any Fo- 
the Plaintiff's reigner, and to ſeize, and fend that which i; 
ſpiced Cakes, bad to the Priſons, c. That the Defendant 


2 * was elected and ſworn a Foreign-Taker, and 


1 that the Plaintiff, being a Foreigner, brought 


the Cakes in the Declaration to Stocks» Marke, 
and upon Inſpection, he found them inſuff. 
ciently baked ; whereupon he juſtifies the Sei 
zure with a Traverſe, that he is gailty at 
Weſtminſter, or out of the City, or at any 
Demur, and other Time. Demurrer thereupon, and Judy. 
Judgment re ment for the Plaintiff, becauſe it was not averr'd 


Auer", for that the Cakes were inſufficiently baked. Vid 


— Arer- It. 1374, Cc. 


. Treſpaſs for taking and chaſing Two 
— cog Lambs. The Defendant juſtifies for Toll in: 
for Toll in a Fair for 600 Sheep and Lambs bought by the 


Flair. Plaintiff; and that the Defendants gave him 


Notice, and he refuſed to pay the Toll to the 

Defendants, being Servants of J. R. where 
RepP, That upon they diſtrain'd, . Rep, Of Piivi 
as Inhebitant ledge of the Inhabitants of the Dutchy of Lan 
—— — _ Time out of Mind, to be quit of Tol 
of Toll, and of their Goods bought or fold, of which tt 
gave Defen- gave Notice to the Defendants, &c. Demur 
dant Notice. \ rel 


men of the Company of Bakers to be Foreign: | 


TRESPASS. 687 
ter by the Defendants, and Judgment for the Du & 
Plaintiff, without Regard to the Exceptions 72e pro 
made; for that the Preſcription for the Inha- . 

bbirants to be quit of Toll was good. Vide 
I L. 1377, Ce. 

J. 2 Lut. 1498, Cc. Treſpaſs for taking his Defendant 
Wheat, Ge. The Defendant in Bar preſcribes juſtifies for 
„bor a Market, and for Stallage, and Toll of all — — 
: Cnin which ſhould be brought, fold, or de- the 

liver'd, or contracted for, upon any Market- and ſold. * 
Days: That one F. F. at the Time of the 
4 Treſpaſs, brought to the Town Five Quarters 
„of Barley, and fold them to the Plaintiff, and 
:. MW thereupon juſtifies. RepP de ſon tort Demeſne, RepP de ſon 
with a Traverſe that the ſaid Five Quarters, ec. 7”, & Tra- 
were fold within the ſaid Market. Defendant *”** 4 
demurs, becauſe the Plaintiff had traverſed a Sed Jule pre 
Matter not alledged in the Bar; and Judgment d mw 
for the Plaintiff, becauſe no Place was expreſly 
aledged where the Wheat was fold. 

f. Vide 2 Lut. 1517, Oc. Bar in Treſpaſs B. per Pre- 
for taking of Goods by Preſcription in the {<*iprion, Iſ- 
Dean and Chapter, for Stallage in a Fair, and — 
Iſue upon the Preſcription, and Verdict for yuic proDef” 
the Detendant, notwithſtanding ſeveral Excep. ; 
tions in Arreſt of Judgment. Vide poſtea ſur 
"wo Cuſtoms, 


the Bar, &*c. ſur Cuſtoms, Cc. 


the * Action was Treſpaſs for breaking Deſendant 


his Cloſe, vocat the Market-Place, Juſtifies as « 

cive and erecting a Stall there. The Defendant non a 

La Jultified, by Cuſtom of the Manor, for all Te- to egy” 

Toll ants to erect Stalls there for the Selling of their in the Mar- 

h he Goods; and that the Defendant being a Te. ket- Place far 

mur nant and Butcher, erected a Stall for ſelling of ©!ling of his 
tell fleſh ; hereupon the Plaintiff demurr'd ; Eo Goods. 


44 


- > j * ” | * | : . A ey 


Quer? meratur nei de Domino Manerii nec quomodo nec per que 


cum Can. Servicia ſeifit' exiſtit de terris tent de Maneriy 
predict, Qd'q; placitum eſt informale & incertun 
Acet iam qd Conſuetud allegat eſt bacua, O. 
Vide Lev. Entr. 194. G3 Lev. 190. Upon the 
Objection for Argument it was objected, That the Plea was 


not ſaying the ill, becauſe tis not ſaid that the Market · Place 


Market. Place is within the Manor, and then the Cuſtom of 
was within 


h . 
ng ſwer d, and allow'd by the Court, Inaſmuch 


as the ſaid Cuſtom is faid to ered Stalls in pre- 

diffo Loco in quo, Cc. it is a ſufficient Averment 

that the Locus in quo is within the Manor, 

Thar the De- 2. The Cuſtom is to erect Stalls to fell their 

fendant faid Goods; and the Plea is, that he had erected 

not that he 2 Stall to fell Fleſh, and ſays not Carnem ſwam, 

__— might be the Fleſh of a Stranger, a 
Carnem ſuam, Wa 

and therefore 2 Cro. 46. Burſer vers Martin, Trefpals, Quan 

held ill. equum cepit a perſona de le Plaintiff, and becaul: 

5 t was not equum ſuum, Judgment was given for 

the Plaintiff, and ſo it was ruled to be done in 

this Caſe. But becauſe it ſeemed to be a hard 

Caſe, the Court adviſed the Parties to agret 

to mend the Plea, and to go to Trial upon th: 

Merits, which they agreed to. Vide 3 Lev. 191. 

Juſtification . © Vide Bro, Red. 288. Qd' habetur 2 nun 

to eredt Stalls d ina in Anno un? Mercatum in qualibet ſep 

—_— © tiana? annuatim apud R. in ſtrato ibm' voc 

for exceeding © 44. Street, in quo ſtrato Def' ſeit de Meg 

Seven. per Preſcription” erexit in loco, &c. Stall 

© non exceden 7. ſuper quibuſlibet diebus Nun: 

din & Mercat' pro vendition' bonorum & 

© mercimon*, Et poſt Nundin & Mei cat finit 

extra locum amovit, & qd' Def* poſuit 4 

© Stalla que fuit tranſg', Et travers qd' eſt Cul 

© ad aliquod al tempus quam diebus _ x 

© Mercat', &c. 

: BN. Iden 


the Manor could not extend to it. It was an. 


— 


Ma =, pPp SYS (4A .. © tw 5A fag 


. t,t el 
ö * 


% 


. © Idem Bro. Red. 480. Bar qd' Villa de M cepir 
N. eſt antiquus Burgus incorporat per no- Equum pro 


men Ballivorum & Burgens qui fuer? ſeit de Lig pane » 


Villa tent” de Rege in feodi Firma, & ha- Rege, Et pet 


© buer” Mercatum ibm? die Sabbati qualibet Auzillum. 


© Septiana' & Tolnetum pro omnibus Bonis & 
© Merchandiz' ibm' vendic* de emptionibus eo. 
rundum, Er uſi fuer diſtringere pro eodem 
inſolut', Et Def ut Ballivi VilP ceper' equum 
* pro Tolneto inſolur pro Averiis ibm* empt' 
* per Quer?, Et — Auxilium de Rege. 

1 * Q& tranſgr' fuic per perambulationem Qd' tranſgr 
© ſecundum cons Paroch' diebus Rogation, fuit per per. 
© Et travers qd? eſt Cul' in forma in Narr. oy arg 
oF Ent. 617. Up. B. Pref. 181. Co, Em. My Te 

- © Q& Guttura int' domos Quer' & Def? QUD" re. 
uit ruinoſa, Et Def ws cons? Burg? mole er as 

amovit tegulas domus Quer ad eam reparand, 4. 

. — inde. R. y 619, —__ Parton... 

F* Vide Up. B. Pref. 188. De conſuetud' Cuftom' per 
.* Mortuario habend* optimum animal*, Merwary. 

f. Vide 2 Lat. 1310. Treſpaſs for breaking B ſr Cu- 
her Cloſe, and alſo evading ad entring her f* _ 
Barn, and carrying away a Cow and A he took 1 
Calf, with a Continuando. Bar ſur Cuſtom pur Cow which 
Heriot poſt mortem of every Tenant, &. who afterwards 
died ſeized, &. and a Cuſtom to ſeize it nog aca 
where it ſhould be found: That T. B. a Tenant 3 n chern 
died ſeized, &c. and poſſeſſed of a Cow, which from him, and 
the Defendant 4 Fr, by the Command of deliver d them 
Sir F. R. Lord of the Manor, took as a Heriot, to the Plain- 
and were poſſeiſed of it; and being ſo poſſeſ 22 
ſed, the fame Day the ſaid Cow, at H. predict, ock them. 
brought forth a Calf, and one V. B. took them 
from the Defendant, and deliver d them to the 
Plaintiff in the ſaid Cloſe, and ſhe the ſame 


FAY Day 


\ 


. 


a 3 dE” i . 
* * | * , 
* : P 
ng 


n K Er = * * * _ * * 2 T n ” 4 * _ , 2 an . . | 
* x , + ** o * * 2 3 J 
. s . * 4 - -4 1 
0 þ [ * 1A 
OY. k » * 5 
A - T's , . 
% 9 


= 
= 


n Wan ned 


88 . "CERESPASS. 
. 9» bO Day 'pbtithem- into the Barn there; whiere- 
- e492) upon the Defendants afterwards, viz. 3 dit 
| April Anno predit#, enter'd into the ſaid Cloſe 
| and Barn by the Command of the ſaid Sir h 
ut; and took the ſaid Cow and Calf out of the 
ſaid Barn, and aver that it is the ſame Treſpaſs, 
| Plaintiff de- The Plaintiff demurr'd; and the Plaintiff”; 
murs. Council inſiſted, that the Juſtification of Entry 
into the Cloſe to take the Heriot was not law. 
ful, according to the Caſe of Taylor and Fiber, 
3 Cro. 245, 246. It was ſaid for the Defendant, 
That Sit F R. had Property in the Heriot by 
the Seizure; but it was ſaid they were not in the 
Cloſe by Tort of the Plaintiff, It alſo ſeem'd 
to the Court, That the Continuando of the Trel. 
; paſs was not well anſwer'd, but the Cour 
| "PE thought it convenient that the Right of the 
- 4 => Heriot ſhould be tried; but that afterward; 
: „nothing was done in the Cafe. Idem 1312, 
w. T1313. It js noted, That there is not any ex 
'2 preſs Juſtifteation in the Caſe De pedibus ambu- 
| lando, as by ſaying, C paululum berbe prediqt pe. 
q dibus ſuis ambulendo conculcaver', &c. as is uſual in 
4 - ſuch Caſes. Vide ante de Rents ou Services. 
N | Vide Cuſtom pro Heriot, Rob. Evt. 45 3. Platit, 
| Gen, 607. Tbompſ. Ent. 267. 1 Brown, 352. 


* 
* * * 

* q 
* 


e M oe £A © > tn tw. ee 


OG Dees mad em. , A. aac,  <nd 


! aK. £1 

dar per De- . Treſpaſs for taking and carrying away 

; miſe of an bis Cattle at B. in Com Norf *. Bar”, That f 
**. 


% Many Earl of St. Albans, and others, were ſeiſed 
1 Parcel, and in Fee of the Honour of C. demiſed to the 
. a Cuſtom to Defendant HF. that the Plaintiff was ſeiſed in 
diſtrain fer Fee by Diſcent of the Manor of B. and divers 
Fines. . other Lands in the ſaid County of N. held of 
the ſaid Honour of C. and a Cuſtom for the 

Lord of the Honour to have Fines upon Di. 

ſcent, and to diſtrain any Goods or Chattels 

for the ſaid Fines arrear and not paid, and 

3 juſtifie 


4 N 4 [4 * . ky 4 py 
\ , 7 4 * Wn | * * | 65 . -» * , 
4 e 


jaſtifies for 12 d. for every Meſſuage, and 124. 

tor every Acre incloſed, and 6 4. ſot every 

Acre not incloſed within the ſaid Manor: 
RepP, That there is no ſuch Cuſtom, Es hoc Repb, No ſuch 
pet 4d inquiratur 2 Patriam; and Defendant Coſtom, Er 


demurs: But Judgment for the Plaintiff in e dm, 


Courſe, becauſe the Defendants having demur- 5. p. | 


red, neglected to argue the Demurret. Vide 
2 Tut. 1297, & 1300. Where *tis obſerv'd, 
that though the Cuſtom be good, yet that the 
Plea is not well pleaded. Er vide Rob, Ent. 
F 2 | 
, 1 Vide 2 Lut. 1317. Treſpaſs for breaking Bar by Cu- 
his Cloſe, digging his Soil there, and taking and 3 
carrying away a Load of Lead. Bar per Non carry away 
Cul? to taking Part of the Lead; and to the the Reſidue 
Reſidue of the Treſpaſs, pleads that the Locus after accuſto 
in quo is a Place within the Hundred of N. cal. 3 
led the King's Fee or Field, and Parcel of it; P 

that in the ſaid Place was a Cuſtom for any 

Perſon, being a Subject, Cc. (without ſaying, 

d bene licuit to dig for Lead ig the ſaid Place, 

called, Oc. and to carry away and retain the 

Reſidue after the accuſtomed Duties paid, (Ec- 

cleſus Cæmeteriis altis viis Regiis domibus & gardin 
ſolummodo except.) Per quod, & c. and fo juſtify. 

Demurrer inde; and Judgment for the Plaintiff; Quer demur' 
Firf, For that the Allegation of the Cuſtom © * BY 
is altogether imperfe&, by reaſon of omitting _— 
the Word | Licuit.] Secondly, That if that al Allega- 
Word had been inſerted, yet the Allegation tions. 
of the Cuſtom had not been ſufficient, becauſe 

that a Cuſtom ought to be poſitively alledged 

by Uſage in Fact, according to Moor 123. 

Yatess Caſe, Cc. Thirdly, Becauſe the Cuſtom 

is not alledg'd to be in any Manor, Vill, Pa- 

Tiſh, Ce. or to be the Cuſtom af any Coun- 

try, Hundred, Cc. as in 21 E. 4. 28. b. Cc. 

LY Az I Cyo, 


TRESPASS 69T 


* * 
%a 3 
T 

* * * 

, of 4 9 
4 18 * 
” 2 . — ; 

l g . — r 6 - - <a fd. — * W 

fe — — ”; : = * — . 4 0 4 LETS 
— 22 8 — 8 — { 5 * 3 1 * — - r . dl \ _ CIR WE * 
e 2 2 1 — K * * 7 - — E _ ak 4 N _—_—_— — 
. r . 4 I 1 0 = \ _ _ > 
F — ene — * * — * 
d + oi «Fo - o — N 


— — 1 — = — — — — — — — . — — — — 3 
— ET — * jw — — — A — bens * : 


1 a £ 8 8 ” p 7 2 4 * . * _ A 
Fr k mY * pf es. Find” ( nd Ia £4. 4 8 2 12 * * * 
* ** | . 3 & bs AIST 4+ 8 2 % rn + J N g 
9 T * * 11 * 4 » { C : * \ 
2 1 
-. 
- 


TRESPAS 
1 Cro. 418.  Fourthly, Becauſe the Cuſtom is | 
alledged to be, to dig, take, and carry the 
Reſidue of the Lead after the Cuſtomary Du. 
ties paid for it, but ſhews not what thoſe Du. 
3 ties were, nor to whom payable; and that 
= being Parcel of the Cuſtom, ought to be cer- 
tainly alledged. Id. 1319. | 
Juſtification . Narr. for breaking his Cloſe, Er int alia 
» dig for for throwing down 20 Perches of Hedges, Cr 
xa 2,” ag Bar, That one 4. G. was ſeized in Fee of 
the Manorof D. and that he, &c. Time out 
of Mind, uſed to dig in any Cloſe within the 
Town of S. for Coals, &c. except Gardens, 
as appurtenant to the ſaid Manor, per quod, 
Rep! & De- Oc. Rept de injur ſua propr abſque tali Cauſa, 
„ murr, Demurrer thereupon, and Judgment for the 
| Et judic pro Plaintiff; for the Treſpaſs was alledged in 
Qust', for De alia to be cum porcis, and the Juſtification is, 
Hr bed cum carrucis & averiis carruc ill traben, which 
. he intended to Hogs. 2. The Declaration is 
for breaking and throwing down 20 Perches of 
Hedges; and the Juſtification ſays, Cd ip 
aperuer cormvenien” & neceſſur” viam, and that 
might be without breaking down 20 Perches 
of Hedges; and then nothing is pleaded to 
the Reſidue, as in Nelv. 235, be ought to have 
pleaded Non Cal to Part, and ſhewnin certain 
to what Part, and juſtified for the Reſidue; 
and therefore Judgment was given for the Plain- 
tiff, without any. Reſolution concerning the 
Validity of the Preſcription; or whether the 
Replication was good without traverſing the 
Preſcfiption. Vide 2 Lut. 1347, Ce. 
Juſtifies by . Vide 2 Lut. 1387, &c. Where the Defet- 
EW US gant pleads, that the Cloſe in quo, &c. was a 
| wy away Brcat Moor or Common Waſt, in divers Parts 
Stones for Of which were divers Quarries open, and allo 


©  Reparation many great Stones or Rocks lying on the Sur 
ot Houſes, 198 face 


/ 


D Y d . OR 


Se * 


gw” 7 : wag 4 * 4 * * 


* t * 
TRESPASS. 693 
face of the Soil therez and that the Defendant 

was ſeized in Fee of a Meſſuage, & and that 

he, &c. had uſed to dig, break, take, and 

carry away, and to have to their -own Uſe 

Stones out of the ſaid Quarries for Reparation 

of their Houſes 3 and fo they juſtify for a great 

Stone, with an Averment, that it was neceſſa- 

ry. The Plaintiff demurs, and Judgment for Quer' De. 
the Plaintiff; for that it was not ſaid, that the murr”, Ee 
Stones were uſed or employed: for Repairs, Judic' pro 
Ou ſaltam q penes ſe retinet ad reparand. Qu”. 
Id. 1389. & 3 Levinx 323. 

f. Vide 3 Lev. 160. Where the Defendant Bar per Cu- 
juiſtified _— a Cuſtom for _ — — dig 
Proprietors of Ships of Lyn Regis to dig in the 777% Common 
— - ns, for Ballaſt, os adjudged — for Bal- 
good, tho? they Were no Corporation, it being 

o bono publico & conſuetudo eff Lex loci, and in- 
herent in the Soil co ſerve any Perſon qualified 
to uſe it: Whereas a Preſcription is in a Per- 
ſon,” and therefore ought always to be laid in 
Perſons or Eſtates of perpetual Exiſtence; - 
but otherwiſe of Cuſtoms, as Cuſtoms for Fi- 
ſhermen to dry their Nets in another's Soil; 


. * * 0 4 


alſo to dig Lead in -another's Soil as far as he 


could caſt his Mattock, &c. 

f. Treſpaſs for taking and carrying away Bar, and ju- 
the Plaintiff's Goods, 2 Lat. 2519, Cc. Bar, _ = c 
and that the Deſendants preſcribe and juſtify dom in tue 
for Toll and Cuſtom of all Strangers not Free- port of Lyne 
men, in the Port of Lym Regis, and to diſtrain Regis. 
for Non- payment of the Toll, &c. Plaintiff 
demurs, Eo qd per placitum ill non apparet ut rum 


burgus predict fuit antiquus burgus a tempere me- Quer mora- 


moral necne, &c. Defendant joins in Demur. cur. 


rer: It was objected, That there ought to have That theje 5s 
been a good and valuable Conſideration for no good Con- 
ſuch Toll in Ports, according to Roll. Tit. Pre. ſideration foe 

: Yy 2 ſcript ion, the Toll, &. 


O 4 4 A. a 

of A * Y — 0 

al _ * 
* 


R rms 
TRESPASS 
ſcription, 265: Numb. 5, G. 2dly, That ther þ 
1 — Contideration alledged jo thi Caſe - 
there ought to be, as for Repairs, & Secun. : 
dum 1 Kid. 237. 22. Ed. 4.8. 4. and it ought 
to be ſufficiently. alledged. (2) That the Pre- . 
ſcription to take the Toll is Nonſenſical, for it 
is to take rat ionabil diſtriftion? humoi rebus mey. 
eimonii: & merchandizis de quibuſdem Theolon 
fove Cuſtum ill fic debit & ſalut fuer, Idem, | 
2 2 Lut. 1522, Cc. And the Reporter obſerves, ! 
But the Court That the Caſe was not determin'd at that | 
—— a 27 Time, but that the Court ſtrongly inclined 
* 8 for the Defendant; And Juſtice Poul ſaid, 
1 That the King may have a Port and Toll with. I - 
out any Conſideration; and that one who has 
l | - a Ports obliged to repair it, or otherwiſe he 3 
1 may be indicted: And Chief Juſtice Treby ſaid, t 
| | he was a Reporter when the Caſe of Marren ! 
and Prideaux. (vide 1 Mod. Rep. 104.) was in Ml « 
That the Debate; and it was then held, That the Owner 
Owner of a of a e have a Toll by Preſcription, t 
l 
6 
ö 
| 


han * p, 3 * 


* 


* 


Fot may without alledging of any Conſideration; but 
hive To1 bY in the Principal Caſe, the Defendant had taten 
ce. upon him to alledge a Conſideration, Et pur 


ceo, quære fi ceo ne ſoit bien alledge, lequel le Ples 


? eſt uncore bow ; Lutwych, of Councel for the 

4 _ - Plaintiff, Zevins for the Defendant, + 

7 5 "= ſhall now conclude this Head of Treſpaſs, 
„ fearing this Treatiſe is groum above the intend- 

1 ed Size, and refer you to the General Law. 


Tables, and to the Treatiſe concerning Tre 
paſſes, Vi & Armis, cc. | 07 ng 


- 111 
* 


- . + % * 4 0 * 
* ? g « 7 2 T  »Þ 
by ' 4 bbs ow WY a 
* 2 2 ne" f s % — ' . 4 | 
+2. | 1 0 U E R 122 if _ 
* ; 7 A R 8 4 * * ws Y _— , 5 
Bar inde, G 
Bar nde, Oc. 
TT OTE 


7 


— — oo n 
oa 


| Fir this Head, ſee in the Third Part of Inſtructor 
Clericalis, Bar al Troyer. See alſo the Trea- 
| riſe of Trover; © OO | 


Ore, In the 2 Lut. 1537. Trover, and de- Defendant 
clares that he was poſſeſſed of a Waſtcoat, — 
and 9d perdidit bona & catalla predict“, and that 3 be 4 
the Deſendant found and converted them, quittal in 


Deſendant confeſſes the Converſion, but 1 on? wa 


that the Plaintiff had diſcharged and àcquitted - ſolver” 
him in Conſideration of 'a Promiſe matle by hi 

to pay the Plaintiff 20 . Gee. n 

murs, and his Councel inſiſted that che PIEg Plaintiff de- 


— 2 * - »niwty A 3s . 
was ill, becauſe it is not aver'd that tHe 20 fl. murs, be- 


were paid before the Action brought; for al- — 
tho it is now pleaded, it is only the giving of fer © non 
one Action in Lieu of another: But it was ſaid paid. 
on the other Part, that it had been ruled, that 
where by. the Agreement there are mutual 
, Promiſes: and mutual Remedies, there ſuch an 
. Agreemeptivig-a good Bar, 2 Jones 158, 168. 
v. But it was anſwer'd by the Court, That the 
„Point of this Caſe was riot adjudged in thoſe 
| Caſes, and that they would not change the 
conſtant Form of the Law in pleading in ſuch 
Caſes. Then an Exception to the Declaration 
was moved, viz. That the Declaration is, that 
he was poſſeſſed of a Waſtcoat; and after- 
0- W Wards, in all the Places of the Declaration, 
I RS it's 


r 
1 3 * * ** * 
* ? * * 0 v 1 


* * * * 
FL 
” * 


WWW R 5 ; 

4 . W | » | 
1's ſad, (Beta & tatalls: predi, which could 
1 not be when one Thing is only mentioned 
Et. Judic' pra before, Sed un allocatur, the-Demurrer being 
Queer General, but peradventure it might be other- 
1 wiſe upon a ſpecial Demurrer ; and Judgment 
3 was given for the Plaintiff dew» x5 38; 


z 


— — — 


6 AST. 
. | | . 
: 
ö ". * * a © - - : | 
* i * . a s 
1 a 1 * 


HIS Title is divided, 1. For A&ion af jj 
Waſt for Heirs; 2. For Leſſors; 3. For 


| 9 
aeg, &c. Walt is aſſignable to be 
done in Lands, | Houſes, Woods, or Gar. 
dens, Oc | a 9 7-04 8 


7 : 1 
Bar inde, Or. 
Bar inde, &. 


4 wd f. A 5 relating to Trees, That they were 
E Tees. 2 ; dry and dead, G. Dyer 331. Raft, 
„ Ent. 692. Vet. Intr, 121. „ n 
1 Pollacds. 1. That they were Pollards, and dry. 
1 42 00. 101. | Tit | 


* 


Several Bars. >. As to part nullum fecit waſtum, as to other 


Patt they were dry and rotten,” and.others 

were cut for Plow. boot, Ge. Raft. Eat. 700. 

Shrubs for / That they were Shrubs, and the Trees 
fire boot. grew in Claps, and he cut themifor Fire-boot, 
Ce. Co. Ent. 703. ” 2 F 7 Thal 


ee ee 


rr 


2 AE. a. DAM - oh Conc 
A 


BY vous, with a Trave 


a 0 * * g 
een. N 9 N K * 883 tht 8 5 ws 
4 * 5 ea Ga ates hs A ü nnn 
* , . N en * o EP = 7 
» * - A 
4 * E :, on 
- * 
* . J * 4 2 1 ; 
. 
— . . 
4 * | Z | 
a 4 


ö oxpinde#/ms Trees inthe Re» For Repairs, 

pairs of-a ruin'd Barn, . Ch. E.. 
The line for- Shingles about covering For Shingles 

Houſes, Se. and for Hedge-boot. Co. Exe, : 


7 That he cut the white Thorns for repair- Of white 
ing of Hedges, r. Co. Et. 709. RepP, Thorns to 
That there were N of black Thorns, &c. Header 
Nite, Moſt of the Ara are Cd fie 8 
tie of the Defendant's 
Allegation. 


J. As to Part. aullam fecit Vaſtum, that Several Bars. 
others grew on the Plow'd Grounds, and he 
cut down the Oak for Melioration of the 


N. Gen. 651, 658. 2 5 
Of. Saveral Pleas to ſeveral Particulars of Several Pleas, 
a 


En. 69. 
. That the Oa 
of twenty Years, RepP qa” fuer 21 Annorum, Oals were 
with a Travers gd" fuer infra 20. Raſt, Ex. G. — 
692, 698, Vet. ur. 121. FT "—_ | 
. The Executor, as to the Woods cut, ſays, As to Woods - 
Thar he, in Reverſion, ſold to the Teſtator cut by Execu - 
al che Trees that could be ſpared. Dyer go. or. 
I Thar the Leſſor, before the Grant of the That Leſſor 
Reverſion, fold the 100 Feger Def, RepP q& non. ſold to the 
3 Brownl, 284, 1 Brown, 374 . That Defendant, 


3333 3 bat the Houſes fell down thro” che Wen 
— Tar b ole che Timber 3. Rep/', That they werg 
own ear 


Was not fixed. ſub imento, and traverſes that it Was fixed, C 


— pro dot by his Claim Create 2. particular Eſtate, 
"and Diſſeiſor of the Fee by Neceſſity, becauſe there 


4 4 . N a * 3 n 
* n " * n * nn 
6 a 
*; b. 


* 


* a f ue „ oo... ' 1 
* N b ; 
* a 
74 > 
{ < . 


os well..tepaic'd,. and, waſted by the Defendant. 
en. Ras, 692. Ver. lr, 4. Simile, 3 Brownl, 276, 
I Brown. 373. | , . | * | 

By Teqagtis; {+ Tenam in Dower: pleags to ſeveral Parti. 
B. 5 filling up the Ditches, Ge. ſpecially, 
And Non Cul xo the reſl. 1 Brownl. 278. Moo. 54, 
Ponds a. . Bar, That he made the Ponds ſor water. 
king. ing the Cattle, ( Eur, . 
That the That the Defendant built the .Wainkeot, 
Waiaſcor , anch lightly fixed it to the Walls Cun calcę & 
Defendant -. Deſendant pleads, That the Leſſee died 


pleads, That inteſtate, Et adminiſtraco nunquam fuit commiſi 


- 


_—_ — Def . Et 4d terminus Annorum aut ulla parn il 


aut aliguod jus titlum frue intereſſe in tenti“ pits 
misiddafben dict ye wed Leſſee in vita ſua aut per aliquan 
to him. admiinifrator . zallo, modo aſſgnat cougar ſu 
Rey, That he tradud fuer? aut fac, Ren 4d Def ut, Eu 
entred as Exe. d injur ſua propr in tenta predic intravit, la, 
cutar, Pe, mando termin predict O. virtute inde poſſeſs fut, 
Se e, E Felt vaſtum, Ce.  Deiendagr demurs, and 
— Judgment for the Plaintiff, 3 Lev. 33, Or. 
„ held That there is not any particular 


uer, and 


e and ſo apportion his Wrong, but ſhauld bea 


© is no other Eſtate in Eſſe; but in the Caſe a 
— Bar he had a rightful Term in Eſſe, and he in 
m. Reverſion could not maintaip Treſpaſs-during 
„the Term, and therefore cas reaſonable that 
bie ſhould have Remedy upon the Contract 

a againſt him that claim d to be in hy the Con- 

tract: And Ae. Pl. 126. ſeem?d.to be admit 
ted, that there might be an, Executor of - hi 
n e ee 


m n * 5 "I F 
* of 2 * . * o 2 * | 


7 N W 2 7 2 * * * - ” "35 * 5 * FOR 2 
4 * 0 * . : x . Tho 4 
: * E + w 4 * * 1 0 * * * 7 
x E " x * 8 
22 * 


own Weoogof a Term. — = Sex'Cly 5 | 
Hur. * N Fl $4. Ar 94 7 10 


\ + | * | £4 Is . „ 9 94 


. Nul Walt falt! fo Aer is, Fog Be 


| plications, Trader ſes and Amen 
KRejo & flue, Tha TR {them 
fo Houſe-boot. tel 7 2 


71 WS Av; 4 * 1] 
1 Ide 2 Lit. 1 5, Ge. Defendant pleads Bar. 
Nl Waſt Fa to divers Waſts 'affigen- 
— "Rept to the firſt, That the Deſendant : 
made the Waſt, Ge. "and traverſes, that he 
expended the 20 Oaks about Houſe- boot, &c. 
The lame Replication to tlie 30 Oaks in B. and Rep!. 
the like Replication as to the Waſt aſſigned in 
$, with an Averment, that the Top there 
were. Sparſim ereſcen. Reo; and the Deſen- Rejo', * 
dant takes Iſſue, as to the 20. Oaks in 4. and L 
jo in B. That the ;Detendant' expended them f 
lor Houſe · boot. Idem 1549. This Cale be. 
ag tried at the Common. Plia Bar, it was ob- 0 
jected by Lutwycbe, the Defendant's Councel, Title bbw, b 
That as to thoſe Waſts, to which the Deſendant ** 
„ had pleaded / Waſt fait, Thar the — 8 
ic WI cught to ſhew a Title to the faid Parcels o my 
d Land in which the ſaid Waffs were aſſigned; Nul Waſt 
% bor it was the General Iſſue in this Action, by fait rhe gene. 
a WW which nothing was admitted; and fo was the ral IH. 
e of the Court; but the Court being 
norm d, That the Evidences of the Plaintiff's 
a Title were in the City, Leave was given to 
5 lend for them. 
a W +2, That Nel It fait is the General Iſſue, When end 
. Godb. 209. Sir Fobn Gages Caſe, Then where the 
- he takes Notes, that the Statute is recited in 2 
- the Writ in this Caſe, as by the Regilter 73. 5. recited. 1 
is i ought to be; and if ſo, 11 it be well _—_ 
a WM 


> T ww” 


= 
1 
4 
- 
* 


uw * a = '* O&® Poa 


enam in Dower, far 
was a Prohibition of Waſt againſt then 
at the Common Law. 5 H. 7. 17. It dos 
not appear how the Tryal went after, but the] 

Reporter obſerves a great Prolixity in the Re. E 
cord might have been avoided. 1550. 


Nul Wat Null Waſt fait. Raff. Ent. 689, 690, 691, 


fait. 694, 700. Co, Em, 693, 700, 708. Va. 
ö 4 35 4+ 1 Brownl, 2756. Hern 744. Clift 
IS, | tf Ws 


Simile cum . © Simile cum ſopera'ibus proteſtationib 

proteſt”. 22 Brownl. 274. P23, 4 | 

Non Cul' ff. © Quoad partem vaſti in domibus & bol. 

quoad parr'. © cis Non Cul*. Co. Ent. 703. | 

Several Bars. o.- : Quoad partem juſtificaco* ſp'ialis, Bt 
8 ; quoad refid' nullum fecit vaſtum. Co. Ent, 


709. 5 gh 4 

Br per Con- . © Bar per Concordiam dare Quer' -ſcrip 

cord · tum Feoffamenti in ſatisfaction valti, Et De 

| | P murr? inde | Co, Ent 07. 1 T 

proteſl cm . © Proteſt qd' nulſum fecit vaſtum pn 

placito. 2 non attornavic ante conceſſionem. C. 
| , 8. 6 ps 

Per viduem. . Vide placita qdꝰ nullum fecic vaſtum pol 

A Vic At. Em. 694. Vet. bn 

I A - 

v poſt mor- . d' Quer immediate poſt mortem vii 

— reli- © Aug md dimifonem reliquit Tenta, 

quit Tent*. © Rep! ꝗdꝰ occupayir Tenta! virtute dimiſſio 

10 . nis. Rep. En. 690. Het, Intr. 168. 


＋7 


2 


n  fecit- vaſtum ante afſigna- Null vat 
gjonem, Repl* - aflignaco fact fuir per ante Aſſign”. 
' raudem, gr. Ex Demurr* inde: Co, Ewe. | 

( 697. & Placita Gen, 642. | fa 

\£ © Nondimiſie, Co, Eat. 1111. 

4 d' dimiſſio ſact ſuit Def de quarta Dimiſſio de 
parta terrarum except boſcis; Et Demutr” Quarta parte 
' inde. | Co. Ent, 696. * h | 


d' J. S. demiſed ove Fourth Part of the Simile. 
i Premifſes to bim, reſerving the whole N. ; 
Et Demurrer inde. 1 Brown. 371. SOT 
ſ. Oe dimiſlio fact fuit ſine impedimen- or 10h with: 
o vaſti, Demurr' inde. Co. Ent. 694. men. 
9.8 Dei“ cogn' Dimiſſionem & Aſſignatio- Def non 
Ja. nem, ſed plitat'qd' ante irrotlacon ſcripti Leſ- attorn ad 
14:4 for levavit finem Quer in ſeodo, Et qd Def finem. 
non attornavit ad Et Demurter indeQ. 
bus 4 Co. 6g. | 
Concerning a Recovery pleaded in Walt. Recovery. = 
0, e 2 Lat. 1549, 1550. | adhd 
F © Qd' Quer nichil habet in reverſione Nihil in Re- 
EF tencorum”. I Brownl, 297, & 1 Brown, 313. vertion'. 
1 “ Ad partem vaſti non dimiſit, quoad Several Bars. 
reſid* qd Quer nichil habet in Reverſione 
tentorum . 2' Anderſ. 93. | 
ſ. © Qd' Remanere terrarum in tallio diſcen+ Remaner' 
debat alii, qui eſt inde ſeit, Et Demurrer alii. 
inde. Plo. 443. ; | 2 "161 
Cl Dei cogn dimifionem, fed plicat' con- Def cog? 
ventionem de conceſſione in feodo ſuper Li- DOT 
pol cenc? obtinend de Alienatione in Mortmain Caffier: 
In. J. & alii feoffaver' Prepoit' & Scholar per Kc. & Tre. 
Licenc* & levaver' finem eis qui ſunt ſeit', Et vers qd Re- 
vii travers qd? Reverco' diſcend al D. & Exit' verco? di- 


L 


iſe 


S255 >s s. 


nes if inde. Ref. Ent. 69 1. .. 
lo Bat, pur ceo que eſt meſme Eſtate pur Meſime Else 
vie in remainder', Flacita Gen. 675, pur vie. 


oy | fd. © Non 


1 * | ern : | 
702 WASI. g 
| Non dimifit . Non dimiſit modo 8c forma; Exit ſuper i 
& Exit. * inde Ve! fa' agard prox' Hundred eo by Pl 
| Quer eſt Dominus Hundredi àbi villa eſt, p 
© &c. Placita Gen. 665. „n "i | 
View de Nota, q& fur Ve fa' agard; Jur' interim 
Waſt. © videant tenta? vaſtae, Vet. Intrac. 167. Wiic 
1; Cor con- H Cor Jur continuar' tam pro deſch of 
tinuat”. * Jur' quam defcu* Viſus. 1 Town's Fad, 196. 
view Sub- , Jur comparem' videant tenta" vaſtät fi I k 
pena. © pena: Co. Ent. 82. Wal 
, View where. Where the View of the Jurors is requiſite, th 
'A Vide 2 Saund. 254, 355. Et vide poſtea. 


Falſe retorm If the Officers retorn, that the ' Jurors had 1 
de View. the View ; yet, if the coritrary appear By Exe WV 

mination at the Tryal, the Retorn ſhall no 

conclude any of the Parties. Id. 27 57. 
Abatement ff. Vide 2 Lut. 1551, Ge. Brief in Watt IC 
by a Deviſe in which the Plaintiff enticles himſelf to the 
over, and Reverſion expectant upon an Eftate for Lit 


_ m in the Defendant as Couſin and Heir of * 1” 
| e and counts accordingly; and the Defendant 
leads in Abatement of the Writ, That the wh 

Fig V. V. deviſed the ſaid Reverſion to de 


Plaintiff, and the Heirs of his Body, and tr. 
verſes the Diſcent, c. which: was confeſſe 
and avoided before by the Deviſe. Plaintiff 
Traverſe ill, demurs generally, and the Exception wa 
— that the Addition of the Traverſe had mad 
1 Bier. the blea ill, but it was adjudged that the Pla" 
; was good; but it's obſerved, That if the Er"! 
ception had been ſhewn for Cauſe of Demurrer 
the Plea had been ill. Judgment 24 bre 

| caſſ.tur, Idem 1558. by 
Nut Waſt Afterwards a new Action was brought, an 
fait pleaded by Conſent the Defendant pleaded Nul Wi 
#frerwards. fait, and was at Liberty to give any ſpeci 
| Mater in Evidence: And at the Tryal at In 
before Juſtice Powell, to ſtay the Tryal it wiÞa 
objected, Th 


d 
Ac 


* * * Mo. v 4 0 * " * 5 4 * 2 12 
e A8 * OS 
703 


bo That ne of the Jurors had the Vigw pft the Objetion to 
21 Place waſted, . and 7 1 N it ap- = the —4 
x d to be ſo, and thereupon the Tryal was yet 

; 90 Et fic" materia dormivit. 3 N 
m The Reporter obſerves,” That the Examina- Examinstion 
bon ought to be upon che true Seyinß of ſix of the View, 
+ of the Jurors, and that is ſafficient, 1559. 
| But if the Jury be ſworn, that they are If the Jury 
knowing of- the Place waſted,” it is ſufficient, _ the 
abe they are not ſworn whether they had Place waſted, 
the View. 

That if Waſt be aſſi 20 in ſeveral Places, If in ſeveral 
and the Jury had not the View of them, the Places. 

Jury may find Null Waſt fair. Id. 1558. 

That if the Place waſted is ſhewn to the Place * 
jury by the Plaintiff's Servant; if it be by — Plaintiff's 
Command of the Sheriff ir is ſufficient. 12 Servant. 
1559s 

And ſee 2 Saunders 254, 255, Cc. Green 

derſ. Cole in Error. | 5 

See the late Act for Amendment of the Law, 4 & 5 anne, 
when the View of a Meſſuage, &c. ſhall be . 16. con- 
neceſſary, a ſpecial Writ of Ditringas or Ha. y_ che 
% Corpora may be iſſued by the Court; by = 
which the Sheriff, or ſuch other Officer to 
bom the ſaid Writs ſhall be directed, ſhall be 
Wcommanded to have fix out of che firſt Twelve 

di the Jurors named in ſuch Writs, or ſome 
preater Number of them, at the Place in Que- 
ion, ſome convenient Time before the Tryal, 
bo then and there ſhall have the Matters in 
eeſtion ſhewn to them by two Perſons in the 
ad Writs named, to be appointed by the 
Court; and the ſaid Sheriff, or other Officer 

pho is to execute the ſaid Writs, ſhall, by a 
Wp<cial Retorn upon the ſame, certify, Thar 
e View hath been had according to the Com. 
and of the ſaid Writs. See Fourth Part of 
Inſtructor 


W * LAG 
x . * 
4 
„ 


We” | 7 04 5 | W AS T. 

2 "AER S  afer. the Epiſtle to u 

2 * er. 2 t 14 tf 

f  Nwe, That by Stat, 8 9 V. 3. Ca, 11, þ 
is enacted, That in all Actions of. Walt ar 

thes, 37 Debt upon the Statute for not ſetting forth 
i, . Tythes, where the Damage found by ns Jr 


ſhall not exceed twenty Nobles; and in 
Suits upon Writsof Scire Facias, and upon pra 
hibitions, the Plaintiff obtaining Judgmen, 
or Award of Execution, after Plea pleaded 
or Demurrer joined therein, ſhall recover hal 
Coſts of Suit; and if the Plaintiff become 
| nonſuit, or dilcontinue, or a Verdict pz; 
. againſt him, the Deſendant ſhall have 
- . - and Execution for the ſame. _— J 


Sr 


| | 4-4 Copyholder for Life — Nor. of | i 


him in Remainder. 


Demurt a! EE 3 Lev. 130. An Action on the Cik 
Narr. brought by him in Remainder againſt 
2 Copyholder tor Life that committed Waf 
lie ion doth and upon Demurrec to the Narr. ſome held n 
g ſuch Action did lie, others that it would, ani" 
that the Damages might be very well aſſed 


| and hereupon the Caſe was intended to be al af 
q OW” journ'd into the Exchequer Chamber, but chalk © 
2 was not, ſo it was thought the Parties agret ” 
| - | I. x11, 132. Vide Doct. Demurr. 347 3. * 
| If the Con- Note, In 1 Lev. 309. it is ſaid, That U, 


verſion be of Converſion of a Brew-houſe into Tenement 


1 « greater Va- altho of greater Value, is Waſt; and the 

j g we, c. it's made 9 in Waſt, Quis Ficit wa 18 
1 vendit ion &. deſtinttiovem, and the Jury f, 
1 the Waſt, but not the Vendition, if ic be mais f 
1 rial, and it ſeems not. Yide 2 Saund. 255. , 


4 J 


1 4 0 9 ma i 
£ 7 9 a > 
* 7 0 * * * i 7 * 1 * 7 
. * 
% 2 7 9 
» * 
+ 


n mY as * * = "FM - "Y - © 
: N * * ä rn * » x "ns M's n TY Is; 
\ FS, ; . 8 \ en + 3 . w. - : ' ? 2 
* - . F p , 
2. by "MF N 
: . 1 1 
146 . * 5 . F PF + * 
3 » g ˖ 
| n % þ 
\ . wo 
= 
* >» = We 0 
"4d 
. 5 * 


bl By 2 Sd. 254. An Action of Waſt hies Ther Wat 
dot in Ancient Demeſne, becauſe they, upon lies not in 
Deſault at the Grand Diſtreſs; cannot make a ee 

Writ te the Sheriff to enquire of the Waſt, 1 

s the Statute appo inne. . 
Zut that an Action of Waſt is well main. Wia in Lan. 
tainable in London by Cuſtom. Idem 254. am. 

That Waſt lies not againſt the Baron after Not againſt 
the Death of his Wife, Tenant for Life, 1 Lur. r after 

| | ie s 

. Death. 


Im þ & 3. 4 1 
— Ao © 43 4d 1 * 
2 NY ita is fads”. * 
* FN } * 
* _ P 
m # 


"7 > 


— 
D 


The Concluſion of this VO L UME. 


* Judgments, and other Proceſs in Waſt, Reference for 
I refer you to the two General Lau. Tablet, Judgments in 


and ſo conclude this FLFTH VOLUME. WO 


© Obſerving, from the Statute of 8 & 9 Colts for the 
. 3. ca. 11. That if any Perſon ſhall com- 1 
ence in any Court of Record any Action 3 
or Suit, wherein upon Demurrer Judgment Wrirs of Er- 
ſhall be given againſt the Plaintiff, or Deſen- ror. 
dant: Or if at any Time, after Judgment 
given for the Defendant, the Plaintiff ſhall ſue 
Vit of Error, and the faid Judgment ſhall be 
affirm'd, or the ſaid Writ diſcontinued, or the 
FF aintiff nonſuit therein; the Defendant ſhall 
ve Judgment to recover his Coſts againſt 
Much Plaintiff, and Execution by Cæpias ad Sa- 
ſifaciendum, Fieri Facias, or Elegit. 

And again, by the Statute 4 & 5 Anne, 4 & 5 Ame, 
6.16. For Amendment of the Law, whereby £2: 16 For * 
lawful for any Defendant or Tenant in any — Gur 4 
\&ion or Suit, or for any Plaintiff in Reple- 1 9 
n in any Court of Recoid, with the Leave 
If the ſame Court, to plead as many ſeveral 


litters thereto as he ſhall think neceſſary for 


us Defence. 
2 2 Provided 


D 


9 a 
7 8 e 
. 


Jos WAS 7. | 

E "But Colts op- Provided nevertheleſs, That if any ſuch 
das Demur- Matter ſhall, upon a Demurrer joined, be 
* rer, ., jud d inſufficient, Coſts ſhall be given. at the 
—_; * Difcretion of the Court, ©. as is before cb 
. ferved in Replevin at the beginning thereof, 


2 


— 
* 


DAR al Ob ſur Arbitrement, by ſbort Re. 


D ferences, viz. | 
Qd' Nul fecer” Arbitrium, Rep! per Atbi. 
trio, Rejo' ꝗd' nullum tale fecer' Arbi- 
e trium, | : Pag. 3 
© Simile fur Traverſe qd' C. & Conſilium 
© fee Arbitriumn, ibil. 


© Q& Scriptum talem in fe continet Condi- 
| o tionem, and ſo pleads without Oper, ibid. 
© Qd Arbitratot? fecer' Scriptum Arbicrii 
© indentar” modo & forma ſequen', ibid. 
. Qd' un Arbitrator' obiit jnfra tempus, 
© &c; Repl? qd" ſuit ſuperſtes infeſto, &c. 


EY *t 109" Bd 
* Q Def ſec res atbitrat, Rep! non ſolvit 
denar', &c. 4 


© Q& Arbitratores ſecer' Arbitrium in hec 
© 'verba, & Def' performavit omnes in 
* omnibus, Rep! per Breach aſſign', & 
© Repo” al Breach, | ibid. 
Qadꝰ Def” obtulit Semam Piſcium arbitrat* 
© & Quer recuſavit, Repl' qd' arbitraver 
© quatuor Semas & alias res, ibid. 
id Rep!? per tale Arbitrium, but aſſpgns nd 
© Breach, & Demurr' inde, ibid. 
* Al Bar, Rep! ꝗd' Det? exoneravit Arbitra- 
© totes, Def Demurr', ibid. 
| 2 2 2 PIO 


nn... 1 * 9 * 8 wn 4; * N 
wenne.“ 7, TS 
* 4 * * " i EY! * * « N Er hs ” 7 * * 5 by 

| oo * 4 n 

- o 9 * 

| % . * WT 5 * 

© | t Wo 

n & * bl | 

N. GY 24 

© * oy "= l 4 


© Pro placite qd ou delibetaver Arbitrium;- 

. 0 Re „ Breach & Demut, Peg. c 
. © Qd' Arbitrator nec Umpirator” ſec? Arbi. 
. « trium, Rep!  & Breach aſſign”. Rejo' 
\ gc nullum tale fecer Arbitrium,” ” ibid, 
| © Bar per Arbitrium prout patet per Scrip- 
tum prolat*, Rep! qd” Def” non exone- 

© ravit Quer' juxta Arbitrium, Reid qd 

© exoneravit, Demurr' eo q& non mon- 

f © ſtrat quomodo. dil, 
© Bar al larg, Qd' Arbitrator' null' fecer' Ar. 

* bicrium, Rep! per Arbitrium fact & pro- Ill : 

© teſtando qd' Def” non performavit aliqua, | 

pro placito ꝗd' non ſolvit denar', p. f. &c. WW | 


| Simile, K 20 
+ Aliter, per nullum ſecer' Arbitrium, Repł 
qd' fecer” & aflign' Breach abſque prote- 
* {tando, &c. Et Rejo' null' tale Arbitrium, il : 
3 | 7, &c. 
| * Def” pet auditum Condition), & placitat null 
* fecer” Arbitrium, Repl' per Arbitrium lf : 
- * fat”, & Breach pro non ſolution? denar', 
| | "ob Sc 
* Nullum fecer' Arbitrium, RepP qd' Umpi- 
© rator fec', Rejo' ꝗd' revocavit Submiſſio- 
© nem, Surrejo* non revocavit, Et Iſſue. 11, 


i 12, &c. 
© With Notes thereupon as to a Counter mand, 


| 13, &c. 
© Nullum fecer' Arbitrium, &c. Rep!? qd I | 
* fec', and ſhews the Award; and the Defen. 


* a” 


— . br. 


dant demurs, 145 IF 
© Oby. That the Award was made all on one 
© Side, ; = 


© Def” plitatꝰ ꝗqd' Arbitrator' fecer* Arbitrium 
pro ſolutione denar? & deliberation' Gene. 

© ralts Relaxation' quos Def” fec', Repl' qd Fl | 

* non ſolvit denat', and tenders Iſſue. * 
7 ant 


5 N wk 4 PO . * * * 3 — AA 8. 4 

_— l _— "F\, * " i ML TOY EO f ** 
? ST * ” * 1 I N 
% * * „ 2 L 7 , — * * , 4 
* 1 , 3 : . * *. —— v % 
MS. -y ; 
5 A a © & *. 7 , XA =” 

\ ff N 


_ _ * £ * , 
4 > * by TE * * "Y y 
* 7 _ "7 # * 
7 * Jy * Ls, * 
* 


n 


e rejoins by Way of Effoppel, and che Plain 
r. 22 N Page 175 18 


.. .Objefion, That the Plaintiff could not 
haue have Judgment, having not ſhewn 


the other Part of the Award. 19 
Deſendant afterwards aided in Equity, 
Bar per Null Award, and the Plaintiff ſets 
** forth, an Award to yay Money at the Houſe 
* of @ Stranger, &. | ibid. 
Bat per Arbitrium fact & Def” ſolvit denar', 
+ © Rep!” qd” non ſolvit, ibid. 


Plaintiff ſets forth an Award concerning Dila- 
pidations, _ * 211 
Plaintiff ſets forth an Award made by the Um-. 
ire, c. ibid. 

© Def” plitat' qq' Arbittium pro ſolutione de- 
nat al Eſtranger pro uſu Quer' in Sub- 
miſſione eſt Vacuum, 21, 22 
Ad nullum fec Arbitrium, Repl' per Arbi- 
* trium fact' pro ſolutione denar' ad ſhopam 

© ſcriba, with an Averment, that the Defen- 


* dant might have paid it there. 22,23 
A like Averment as to the Place of Pay. 
I, ment, 2 
7 Averment d nulla Actio de novo, ibid. 
2 A like Averment, Er Rejo per non fec' tale Arbi- 


trium & Iſſue, 24, 25 
4 Alke Averment in Rep?, Q4 nulla Atio de 


” novo; Rejo Od" Actio de novo i Quer Demurr , 
LF | 25, 26, &.. 
m Obj. 1. That the Award of Satisſaction 
16 extended beyond the Submiſſion, 26 
" 2. That by the Releaſe, the Submiſſion 
4 Bond would be releaſed, ibid. 
a Arbitrement fait puis darrein Continuance, 
pd Proceſs continued, Demurr al caption” Fur, 


22 3 with 


with Riſorepcs) 10 the Atbjcrerent Rept br 

| Natitiel Arbitrement fait & Iſſue, Page 27,28 

Bar, That che Deſendant. er d o Pay. the 

Money, and the Plaintiff reſuſed i it Plain. 
tiff replies, e Money was to be iu Satil- 
ſactibn of all Came and that the 
Deſendant did not offer to pay. Defendant 
Lene, ny *T 28, 29 
Obj. That by Plaintiff?s concluding tothe 
Country, Deſendant was e of z 

Tre, 29 
Bar per Nul Amid fait, Rept per a” ore 
' zenus, Deſendant demuts, and Plaintiff joins 
in Demurrer, | 393 3 I, C Occ. 
0507. 1. As to Award of Law. Charges, circa 
placita predid, no Suit being m mentioned 

. — 32 

2. As to che Uncertainty of the W 
101 

2. That there ought to have been a Cauſe 
of the firſt Action ſhewn, 7% 1 

p Nullum fecer Arbicrium Repl' per Arbirri. 

* um fa&?, Et qq*-parat' & oblat' fuit fore 

I * deliberar Def tali die, ſed nec Def nec 

* aliquis pro eo ven' ad idem recipiend' & 

aſſign Breach pro non ſolutione denar' 

* &c. Rej o gd Atbitrium ſed indentat 
non parat“ five oblat' ſuit, &c. Quer' 

Demurr', Secundum, 2 Saxnd Rep. with 

c Wu tes thereon, 33, 34, &c. & 52, 
53. See after, 

Obj. That the Rejoinder was a Dgpar- 
ture from the Bar, 36 

2. That it ought to have been concluded 

al pais, 37 

d' Arbitratores nullum fecer Acbierion 
"* | in Scriptis vel per Verbum Oris, Et qu 


* nominaver* un F. Umpriator qui nullum 
* kc 


OT; R F 9 yy de AS Ü! 3 "FT 
« ; 7 0 * 4 * 
1 * 4 Ms 4 . , 41 * 
g , 8 1 +4 U 
2 1 7 ww = -——* 4 ” " 4 
7 | ' | | 
x R 46” 2 8 : 
4 5 4 . « * 
. * Ps ” 


+ fee Arbitrium infra tempus limicat', 8c. 


BN © Rept, that the 24 Umpire Wade an Award 
i © Org tenus. Def demwrs, Page 38, 39, &c. .. 
L The Queſtion was, Whether Arbitrators 4 
. having Power to name an Umpire, may I 
. name a ſecond if the firſt refuſes. Several 2 
t Points ſettled. - 41 


o W The like Bar. RepP, That the Umpire made 
> MW an Umpirage, and aſſigns a Breach for Non- 
2 payment of Money, * Os 
| A like Bar, That the Arbitrators made no 
Award. Rep“, That the Umpire made one, 
and Breach aſſign'd for Non. payment of 
Money. Defendant demurs, 42, 43 
0%. That the Defendant was not bound 
to perform the Award, the Condition | 
in ea Parte being inſenſible, 44, 45 b 
The Defendant prays Oyer of the Condition, | 
and that of the Award ; and the Plain- 
tiff ſets forth a Verbal Award, and Defen- 
dant ſays he offer'd to pay, and that the 
Plaintiff refuſed to accept. RepP, That he 
offer'd, but yet had not paid. Defendanc 
demurs, "26, $9). &c- 
1. Replication adjudged idle, yet Judg- 
ment pro Quer, 49 9 
2. Where there needs no Aſſignment of a 
Breach, ibid. 
d' Arbitratores nullum fecer* Arbitrium, 
deliberand' partibus apud S. Rep” qq' duo 
* Arbitrator” fec' Arbitrium, and . aſſigns 
* Breach for Non-payment of Money, Defen- 
* dant demurs cum Cauſis, That one of the 
* Arbitrators bad not ſigned or ſealed the 
Award, &c. © a 49, &c. 
Obj. If Scilicet be traverſable, the Day of 
the Award being not preciſely alledged 
but only by a Seilicet. 2 51 
2 4 — 


I 


ww fu OO roo HS A, OG Q 0 TC QA DP tt GÞ. a .* + 


* hs 


* * * * W 3 3 * n 
- . EVAN » | * * _— MA ah N 8 * * I 4 9 Wm * 
Fo ** - . * * * * 9 4 * Y IF * 7 * * * 7 *. 1 EL 
* 9 v i 4 
1 p : 
* 
© y \ 
= Us $7 * 7 f 
S f f 
- 1 
= Sa 0 v =... 
” 
- 


Pleas and Obſervations relating to Arhi. 
trament, taken from Lutwiche's En- 
tries and Reports, Page 51, 52, 
at . 53> &c, 
VI 4. 
Ebt ypon Bond againſt an Executor to 
perform an Award. Bar per Nul fe | 
Arbitrium. Rep! & monſtra!' Arbitrium, and 
. Breach, that the Teſtator did not pay upon 
Delivery of the Award, without ſaying Vel 
unquam poſtea; and the Detendant __ 
FI, Oc. 
Obj. An Objection was to the Replication 
of Payment upon Delivery of the 
Award, | ibid, 
Bar per Nul Agard fait. Repl', and ſhews the 
Award, and avers that the Plaintiff was 
ready at the Day and Place, and tender'd 
the Money awarded, and that none was there 
ready to recejve it, and that he was always 
ready afterwards; and afligns Breach, That 
the Defendant had not deliver'd him quiet 
Poſſeflion of the Meſſuage, &c. Defen- 
dant demurs, 52 
Excep. 1. Here is an Exception taken againſt 
the Time of a Releaſe awarded. 52, 53; 
2. And another againſt the Time of the 
Delivery of the Award. 53 
Debt upon a Bond to perform the Award of 
an Umpire. Bar by an Award for Deſen- 
dant to pay, and then to releaſe; and 
avers he paid, and was always ready to 
make the Releaſe, g. Rep”, Shewing an 
Award over, with an Averment that the 
Defendant had not paid; but * — 
VC ag 


The TABLE 
Iſſue upon it, but traverſes the Umpite had 
8 only as the Deſendant had alledg'd, 

Page 53, 54 


Exception, That here was no ſufficient 
\ © Breach alledged in the Replication, and 


that he ought to have concluded to the 


Country. 54 
R. That notwithſtanding that, yet the De- 
fendant's Bar was ill. the Reſolution 


there, and alſo as to the Traverſe. 54,55 


Defendant pleads, That neither the Arbitra- 


tors, nor the Umpire, made any Award. 
Plaintiff ſhews an Award of the Umpire, 


and Breach for Non-payment of 5 J. De- 
fendant demurs, 56, Cc. 


Excep. 1. That the Award was void as to 
Strangers, and ſo void in toto. 56 
2. That it was not final, being to pay 51. 
towards Law. Charges. 77 


Debt upon a Bond to perform the Award of 


an Umpire, fo that the Award be made in 
Writing, or by Word of Mouth before 
Two Witneſſes. Bar per Nul Agard fait 
by the Arbitrators, or by the Umpire. 
Rep, That the Umpire made an Award 
Ore Tenus, but tis not ſaid before Two 
Witneſſes. Defendant demurs, and Judg- 


ment for che Defendant for that Fault in 


the Replication, 57 


Bar per Nul Agard fait. Rep!, That the Ar- 


bicrator awarded that the Defendant ſhould 
pay the Plaintiff 12/. Er d Def abduceret 
equam & pullam ſuam from the Plaintiff, 
and Breach for Non. payment of the 12 /. 
and Defendant demurs, | 58 
Exception was to this Award, for that the 
> ny was ta, take Goods out of the 
Plaintiff's Poſſeſſion, Es Eo 

fs OF" he 


Te AB LE. 

Tue Deſendant pleads Nul Ager fait per . 
 -bitratbres, but that they nominated an Um- 
þ 1.4 ye awarded that the Defendant F 


. 


f 
4 14 


Id pay the Plaintiff 40 J. which: he had 


a * ” 9 * A 
r > 
ha - : * 4 YA b - 
* * 


paid, Replication after Oyer, That he had | 
not paid the 40 l. Er hoe petit, &c. and the 
Deſendant demurs, Page 8 
1. Ob jection, That the Award was only on 
e done Part. yo and ibid, i 
2 Object iun was againſt the Authotity of MW 

the Umpire. | 9 
Debt upon Bond to perform an Award, N pe 
| 57 frat de Premiſſis. Bar per Nul Agard fait, * , 

"Rep and Plaintiff. ſhews the Award, and 

Breach for Non-payment of 11 J. fecundun Wl -, 


formam & effetum Arbitrii predict. Defen. 
dant demuts, J 60 
Excep. 1. That the Breach was not alledged 
as to the Day awarded for Payment. 60 
Excep. 2. Was as to a Releaſe awarded 4 
to the Bond of Submiſſion. #i, 
The Defendant pleads in Bar, No Award or 
Umpirage made. Plaintiff replies, and 
ſhews the Award of the Umpire; and 
Breach, that the Defendant had not paid 
him 12 J. 15s. Defendant demurs, 61 
Excep. x. Whether the Award being Ira ꝗd 
fat, and fo conditional, was final. ibid, NN. 
2. As to the Delivery of Books in Boxs 


being uncertain. ibid, 
3. As to no Time being appointed for 
Execution of Releaſes. jbid. 


4. As to a Reſervation made, that he, &. 
might value the Goods loſt or millaid. 6: 
Debt upon Bond to perſorm the Award ol 
* Two Atbitrators, to be under their Hand 
and Seals, &*c. Bar per Nul Agard fai. 
Kerl, That the Arbitrators, Ceper ſuper |: 


O 


4 
1 F - =* 
x F 
* 
5 * 
f N 
= 
r: . 
\ 2 6 v 


mi We * per ee is ien, 
tat, l Avbitrar fuer ordiuaver; Ge. 
(without the Word Er, 5 that the Deſendant 
thould pay to the Plaintiff, 66 J, at Senock 
pea? 4 Senock being not ae mentioned. 
Def moratar;, ,, Pag e 62 
Exoep. 1. For not averciny the Award was 5 
under their Hands and Seals. ibid. 
2. As to the Word [ Er] being omitted. 63 
3. As to Senoclk predict, Senoch not being 
named before. % e 
Deſendant pleads, Nul Heard fait. Rep . 
' monſtre-le Agard, and Breach for Des. pay- 
ment of 30 4 Ree, That the Plaintiff T. 
von ſrbmiſi. Defendant demurs, 564 
Exeeptiam was, That T. was no Party to 9 
the Submiſſion, Cc. And herein it is | * 
ſhewn, RT Od =» 
1. Wen an Award ſhall be good by rea- 
ſon of Equity, G. ibid, 
2. Alſo where a Thing awarded to be 
dane to a Stranger to the Submiſſion 
ſhall be good. 65 
3 — where an Award ſhall be 8 
dds 5e a Releaſe is awarded, by which 
he Bond of Submiſſion ſhall be relea- 
ta ibid. 
Natration upon a Bond to perform an Award, 
upon a conditional Submiſſion. Bar, that 
the Defendant had paid the Plaintiff the 
ol. but that the Plaintiff had not appoin- 
ted any Time and Place when and where 
the Defendant ſhould make publick Con- 
feſſion of his Offence. Plaintiff thews, that 
the 50 l. were pro Cuſtag ſecte, & c. Abd 
that upon Payment, the Parties ſhould give 
Releaſes, and that he had appointed a Place 


and Time, Cc. and had given the Defen- 
- nn 


N 9 * 3 * 
4 _ be” l * p ” 
9 N * 4 [5 „ 
rt x. » 


4 4 — 

1 . + TY * 

5 * i n hs. 4 * 
. - ad * by 


* 


a PP aw * 
Denen 
4@ . 4 1 . Hl } . 1 


| . * 1 42 3 SK 35 3 * | 
r The TAB E. W A 

$ 3 IT 13 er 1 84 
dant Notice and that the Defendant had not 


paid the 50 l. Deſendant demurs, "Pages; 

Notwichſtanding ſeveral Exceptions, the 
Award was held to be good, mutual, 
| not 


and reciprocal, as to the 501. but 
good as to the Time and Place. 66 
The Defendant pleads Nut Agard fait: The 
' Plaintiff ſhews the Award, and Breach for 
Non - payment of 28 J. 125. 5 4. /Deſen- 
dant demurs, where another Perfon wa 
Party to the Submiſſion, ' 60 
Bar per Nul Agard fait. Repl', and Breach 
that the Deſendant had not paid the 1000 
awarded to the Plaintiff. Rejo*, That the 
Controverſy was concerning a whole Per- 
{onal Eſtate, but that the Award was not 
of the whole Perſonal Eſtate. Plaintiff de. 


_ mars, as 66 
O. 1. That the Rejoinder was a Depat- 
cure from the Bar. - bid 


2. That the Rejoinder was apparent| 
falſe, the Award ſet forth being bod 
full and final. 67 


References to Precedents of Bars to Action 
of Debt, upon Arbitrement without Spe- 


cialty, 7 67 

References to Bars de Arbitrement ix Caſe 

ſur Aſſumpſit. 68 
VIZ. 


HAT the Arbitrator would not make 
the Defendant any Allowance of 4 : 


Now Aſſumpſit, and Verdict pro Ouer?, ibid, 
Solvit al part, C Releaſe al Fir _ 


— " 
" TR : l es l > 
7 ” * * 2 * * — f "> 
4 Ls on „ 
* * 
= = = 
* 4 
# : * 
” 
4 
$17 


E , ee 


— 


* 


No A... era, or Rur to be de: 
liver'd.,,. Ren, That it was made, and 


tedy to We: * % and. Life, 0 Page 68 


Farther Obfervati 005 \conterning 4 N 
"with ſeveral Authorities from the late 
© Reports relating to Award and Dunpi- 
age, *. May of a Summary, ee. | 68 


Nt ” 4.81 


V1 2. i e 
7 where barr'd as to - Part and 
where not, | 68 
Where the Arbitrators and Umpire hand the 
ame Time, 69, 7275 
As to Deſertion by Abicracdes; 69 
When the Arbicracors are left to chooſe an 
Umpire ibid. 
Where. Arbitrators had to 2 Marcii, and if 
not agreed then, to the Umpire by them 
elected, and they elected one 3 Marcii, 


ibid. 
Uſual Courſe of Submiſſi ion, and Things ne- 


ceſſary to make a good Submiſſion, 70 
Concerning Payment to a Third Perſon, ibid. 
As to the Arbicrator's Time before Umpirage, 


ibid. 
When they may nominate an Umpire, ibid. 


dubmiſſion to Four to be ſignified by Two, 


ibid. 
What if the Defendant hinders making the 
Award, 71 


Concerning the Date of the Submiſſion Bond, 


ibid 
Concerning the Place of the Award made, 


uid 
Con- 


R 
ä 
3 
. "4% oh. 

# £ 
g Ty 
FY 
* 


| Eoncening an dd by Word af e 


moans 2 75 * n Benz age "1 
Of an Award to pay the Charges of a Suit, 


.# . 1 9 * N . 4.43 5, #4 / 2 een E thid 


Where. the Money awarded f n be paid to 
the Executors, . 
How,a Submiſſion Conditional, "ah an 
. 2, or 80 that,] ſhall be raken, 
itrement not limited by the Salute, 2 


11 it be all on one Part, n 4 


Where a Man may 6. Law api! N 
Award, 
What if an ward and Logs be limb 


— Ts —— 


What if ſuch Bades be by Jer * 
ment of the Parties, 
When the Arbiarators | may. cb d an Un 
pire, ibid, 
How, a Releaſe may or ſhall extend, * 
What if a Releaſe by awarded & all. Book 
and Judgments, 734 74 
Where an Award may be void in 117 and 
good in Part, 1 — 1 
Where the Award is to find Sndirinatr 71 
Several Actions for ſeveral Sums ——_ 


How an Award may be made good by aRe 


plication, ibid, 
If ic be to releaſe all Demands general 
* ' 306 

Serene! —— cited, and the Award 3 
to one, ibid; 
Where the Award leaves out one Py 
| ibi 

How the Words [ So that the Arbitrators, oc.) 
ſhall refer, jbid, 


I Diſcon- 


Si 


2 TABLE) 
Diſcontinuance of Action not allowed to 
. the Plaintiff in Award, ©» Pager74. 
came Day given to "Ardicrators- and Umpire; 
how he Abicrators Power ſhall be ſaid to 
be:waved, 7 
What if both of them were elected 14 the 
Parties, . 76 
Ad vel ante 19 Feb. to Acbitrators, & ad wel 
ante 20 Feb. to the Umpire, + #bid. 
Where the Defendant was to pay an Attor. 
ney's Bill, ibid. 
If the Releaſe is to be on Performance »of 
What is well awarded, | _—_ 7 
If the Party is to pay in or at the Houſe of a 
Stranger, 77 
How by 9 & 10 Fil. 3. the Scbmiflion may 
be SD a Rule of Court, zöbid. 
Further References to Mr. DO Auver: s late Ge- 
neral Abridgment, 78 
Attachments, c. Sur Arbitrement, concern- 
ing them, 7 9, Cc. 


Bur in Debt fur Olt Vie, & al Officiar 


Efendant after Oyer demurs to à Narra- 
tion againſt one, upon Two Sheriffs 


Bonds given by Joint-Obligors, 82 
00%. He ought not to have demurr d upon 
the Oyer. ibid. 


Vie Com ver Subvic ſur ObP pur performer 
Covenants. Bar per Fonda ſpecially. 
RepP per Caption ſur Ca [a, & Permiſſion 
ire ad largum, Rejo', 04 Quer non fec ali. 
qued ſpecial Marrant. Quer demur', 83 

Simile placitum, Et Rey! per Fi Fu, Et Denar 
te quas non ſolviſſet, per quod, Ge. ibid. 


Debt 


| Debt Exec” vert Def” come Exit tu 
pr Be be” ſi” Er xrns Ber 
mou derinet, Et Tue, | Page 83,84 
4 Debr wer? Vie 2 levat', Bar af par. 
ue, af rf ſec Wi Aeqere, 


As to Bars in Actions on ft Caſe by id 
ainſt Sheriffs, &” . V4, 85 
Del endant 1 the Statute of 2 | Heh. '6. to 
2 Bail-Bond upon a Bill Md”, ſued out 
er die Veneris, fc. Rep, By a Bil Audi 
Mur return die Sabbati prox” poſt, Ct. 
Neo, and maintain his Bil PT, & Warr, 
Et Traverſe Marr in Rep, Quer demuß 
| A Traverſe, 85, Ce. to 93 
- Ohj. That the Rejoinder had taken a MW 
verſe after a Traverſe, 59772 
K. That there was no Traverſe in the Ke 
1 alſo that a Traverſe may be 
taken after a Traverſe; and when, 


530.7 
Whether 7 irtnte 1. arranti may be travers 'd, 


96 

Simi: Bay ve Traverſe, Rep! der Lat' retort 
die Martis, Rejo per Tat wwe die Lung, 
Surrejoinder & e. 1 „ 
The ſame Statute leaded more briefly upon a 
Bond _ r + 2 N. in 


. 6, 9) 
ception, That the Words [Then the Con 


Tun bf the Obligation ſhall be void], was 
a Sanden 0 the ſame rr 


Where Wee r0 Def., deen 7. « 
inſenſible Condition for Appearance, 


100 


Df 


© 3:8 
9 
,- 


o 


—__— J 
4 * 
F * . = - 


* F 54 63 * p * * * 4 2 * | 7 * 7 > C . . * 8 * I 3 * * 4 17 
ENV; \ 4 p _ * , * N 2 * by 1 * : 7 5 2 * * 1 * 9 F 5 Y by - | \ 
28 | ; Rind ; 4 * R , Pins es * 2. * 2 N 
| ; R ; | ha * þ 47 
Ma: bs | 2 >> Sd ER. | 
The T A 1 4 ' * 5 * a f 
| 0 4 1 „ 
F * - . an . : 
4 8 am. hi £ 9 » . t 
* 


: p 3 


b ee fr oe 


| utaptor non babuit Fciew x mee. ſunt Cormmo- 
raus . Com per quod ſcriptum fuit vacuum, 
and ſo would take Adyantage of his own 
Inſufficiency, © © , Page 107 
Like Bar per Stat, and that the Bond was 
made atter the Return of the Writ. Er. 
traverſe qd Ob deliberat fult ante talem 
diem „ - 104 
Like Bar, and that the Defendant was arreſt- 
| ed upon a Ca /a', extra Cane, Et cepit Ob 
pro Inlargiamento, &rc. Quer demur, 105 
Similis Har ſur Attachment è Can“, Et demur 
inde, | 106 
. 1. That an Attachment is out of 
W 107 
2, Tis to appear ap’ eſtm, inſtead of 
be phy ber upon an 
a Sheriff's Bond to pay Fees upon an 
a. Bar per eund rg 3 H. 6 Rept 
dy 29 Elix. for Execution Fees, Def de. 
um, Et Fudic' pro Def, 108, G 
Upon a Condition to be a true Priſoner; 
Bar per Statut, Detendant being taken up- 
on a Liberate, | 109 
Simile, upon a Bond to the Marſhal, Es 3d 
Def” pro Eaftamento & favore demonſtrand 
P. deen tem”, &. 109, 110 
Repl', 04” Def fee? Ohl pro meliori 4 
tat, Quer ne P. evaderet, Def demur, 
cum Notis inde, Et Judic pro Quer, 111, 
| | | | II2 
Upon 1 Bond, al Mutuat, by the Warden 
of the Fleet againſt a Surety for a Priſoner. 
Defendant to the Mutuat pleads Nil debet, 
and pleads the Statute to the Bond, 112 


1 R 22 RepP 


A \ = —_ , 
\ —_ kr 4, = Ti 8 p er "= . W 
= - TD 2 * 
ne 9 I 


\þ 2 * bh N n 4 * 4. Wo 4 - . * . — * 9 1 
*. * 4 2 ” * N * 2 * — 2 FO WS > 6 'S * 
* 4 *. 5 * Ye. ; * „ 9 » 

4 X bh * 4 * * = 4 * ? WY «© 2 * C: % 4 


„ * * * The TAB LIE 3: 
| Rep, by a Proviſo in the ſaid Statute, that the 
3 Wicke of the Fleet ſhould — be dampnifi- 
_ ed in his Office, Page 112, 11; 
Sur ObP per Adm Vic, where the Inteſtate i; 
not ſaid nuper Vie. Bar by the Statute, and 
the Court was againſt the Plaintiff, 113 
. Similis Bar, where the Bond was not men. 
= __ tioned in the Declaration to. be made to 
the Plaintiff as Sheriff; and the Defendant 
© pleads a fictitious Writ to make the Bond 
ww 1 within the Statute, 113, I14 
= * The Plaintiff by Replication prays the Bond 
may be inrolled, and then ſhews the true 
Writ. Rejoinder, Surrejoinder, and Re- 
butter; then Plaintiff demurs, 114, 115 
1. Queſtion was, If the Replication made 
1 the Declaration good, 115 
4 2. If the Defendant ought not to have en- 
tered the Bond upon Oyer, and ſo made 
it part of the Declaration, 116 
The like Caſe between the Writ and Count a 
in the laſt Caſe. Secundum, x Lat,61g. p.11 


q Upon Variance pleaded after Oyer between 


* a "LE : — 
of : 1 W 5 4 bf 4 * wal —_— A 
: N ann 8 * * 


the Count and Obligation ; Plaintiff by Re 
© plication prays Oyer of the Condition, and 
A _ demurr'd. * «rr 
4 After Oyer of a Bond to a Chief Bailiff of a 


Liberty, Defendant pleads Variance between 
the Writ and Obligation, for that this Ori- 


AY inal was ſued out before the Date of the 
A 6 nd, | ibid, 


Plaintiff replies, That the Writ upon which 
he declares was another Writ, and ſets it 
forth, ibid. 

| * Rejo by way of Eſtoppel, by reaſon of the 
\ ' aforeſaid Oyer, and the Plaintiff * 
; 1. Obſerve, 


AD. - = ry 


A 


e r WV _ OF 0 . . IOW 


WITTY 


* I, A 


_ * * 


I 451 Wo 


r. e Where the reading the Weit! ſhall 

not prejudice the Plaintiff, Page 127,118 
4 Where a Demurrer may. be to a Writ, 
318 
Debt Amin 2 Bailiff of a Liberty by an Ad- 
miniſtratrix, 3 87 Minority of the Reſi- 
duary Legatees. Bar by a Habeas Corpus, 

retornable at Weſtminſter, 118,19 
| el“ That he brought up the Party de 
the Return, and then by Fraud ſued 
out the Habeas Corpus in the Plea, and 
traverſes Virtute brevis in placito. Defen- 
dant demurs, n 
Excep. 1. That it was not aver d in the 
Narr. that the Executors were within 


* 4 
* * ho 
— 


the Age of 17 Years, I biad. 
2. That the Virtute cujus was traverſed, be- 
ing Matter in Ley, a 120 


T6 Debe upon Bond, brought by the Mar. 


nal of the Ning 5- Bench, conditioned: for 
Payment of Money; Defendant pleads-the 

_ Statute 23 H. 6. Pro favore, c. 120 
Rep, That the Bond was made Pro vero 

& juſto Debito, and traverſes £2 cape 

© fait colore Offen, ibid. 
To Debt upon Bond by a Sheriff's Bailiff 
conditioned for Payment of Money, Bar 
3 Scriptum non fuit ſub nomine Officii, . 121 

1 Repl pro vero & juſto Debito, Rejo 


© colore Officii & lilue, | i 2 
Bar in Debt ſur Eſcape..... 

N Debt for Eſcape, Bar qd” cepit bilde 

nar? in recente Inſecutione, 123 


* Aliter, Et qd adhuc detinet in prllanz, 234 
be Rep! & Traverſe, Rejo' & lſue, 125 


* Similis Bar, A abid; 
Aaa2 : Rep! 


W 6 
. 
9 * * 


* 


* 


WET). — 4 * 2 4 l © * % 
— * jy 


2 „ * 7 7 N 9 n 
Ame. 
& * 


- ? 5% . 2% VO 1 <P A * * 7 4 9 Y 
F — * Fo of * * — 
# Sd ; | | | 8 
" | 1 ww" "FAY "I: 1 6 
« c 24 g 
A * £4 Sas 2 | 


Rep proteſtando non evalit, pro placito 
| © qd, voluntacie. permiſit H. evadere, & ; 
4 © Traverſe, Rejo qd in inſecutione rece- 
_ © pit, & Iſſue, Page 126 
= | In Eſcape. -Bar, Thatby Conſent 1 
Wo at the Day, Rep! per nul tie! Record Commpa.. | 
4 rencie, Defendant demurs, TENG - . 
= F Eſcape on a Capias Excommunicat', Object ion N 
| That the Action was meerly Spiritual, Sed 
. Fudie pro Quer, 121 127, 128 
3 Where the Under-Sheriff took a Mortgage of 
4 the Priſoner, - . 128 
7 Where there may be a Scire Facias on Eſcape of 
e one taken by a Ca? ſ, ibid. 
| © Non permiſit Def ire ad largum, ibid, 
3 Aliter by the Defendant, being Marſhal of the 
* | Queew's. Bench, and a Venire facias de medietat 
Lingue, and a Demurrer to the Evidence, 
129 
” i _ © Similis Bar, non permiſit ire ad largum. 1 30 
* Q& Prior” Vic' permiſit Priſonat ee, 
; 8014. 
Bar per Habeas Corpus ad ducend' coram ill . 
„Janne | | wid 
© Rep! per voluntary Eſcape, Rejo? & Iſſue, « 
75 131 
© Bar qd” Vic' deliberaver' Priſonar' extra cu- 7 
© {tod' virtute Brevis Domini Regis de Super. | 
© ſedeas, & Traverſe q ante, &c. 131, 132 
Sur Eſcape vers Marr', Bar qd' commis' fuit . 
© ei in Executione & eum in cuſtod' fua MI. 
habuit & adhuc habet, Et travers qd 
© permiſfic Priſonar' ire ad largum, Repłl' qd 


. 


£LJ ty _ nm 


„ pecmiſit, | 133 We 
Bar per non cepic nec arreſtavit, 134 | 
d' Capes! fuit pro alia Cauſa, Et travers . 

* Cans in Narr, ibid. 

© Rep! & Iſſue fur le Traverſe, 135 We 

1 „2 g Noa, 


The TABLE 


* 


du, Where a Volugtary Efcape by the Goa- 


ler hall not prejudice 4 Plaintiff Page 135 
Upon an Eſcape, returning again, and ma- 


king a ſecond Eſcape, 83 
Where the Execution was for lels than re- 
covered, ibid. 


To Debt upon a Sheriff's Bond to proſecute a 
"Replevin i in the County-Court, and to fave 
the Sheriff harmleſs, Bar per le ana Ke 
13 Edw. 1. 

The Condition thereof ſet forth, Er "Fu 


E 9 138 
Bar ſur mene i in Dee. 


Con Account lying againſt Exe- 
cutors and Adminiſtrators, & c. accord-' 
ing to 4 & 5 Annæ, cap. 16. 8 
Bur per Ni debet per Patriam, as to Arrearages 
on Account with the Plaintiff, 140 
Conſeſſion of an Account with the Plaintiff, 
ibid. & 144 

* Simile de Surpluſage de Account coram Au- 
' © ditoribus, ibid. 140 
e Bar per Adm' q& nunquam nnn 
ben d' Adminiſtravit & Iſſue inde,” 140 
VExecutors to Debt upon dümgle 

"Tontan” and allowed, with "the Reaſons 
thereof, 4 141 

© Bar mer Nil debet per Legem, Et Examina. 
Itig Attorn' Quet ſur Account coram Audi. 
— toribus, Secundum Stat. 5 H. + cap. 8. 


4 ___ "4 
4k Alter, Et Examinatio Quer' petit, Et Quer 
© Examinatur per Attorn ſuum, 142 
© Bar ꝗd' exoneravie Auditoris & iſſue ſur ceo, 
143 

Bar per Payment in auter County, 144 


Non -omputavit coram Auditoribus, ibid. 
"T7 3 Conſeſſio 


* ho * + ' 4 ad 5 4 CY > on Cabs 7 WP : : 5 1 
-*t bear ERAS wv” 
"* # 4 p * F 1 

1 


The T ABL. E. 


a a. A in Computo per Exec; 


4 AL 9 Page 4 
"Boi in Debt ſur Amity. 


AR per non detinet, 145 
Bar qd Quer reculayit dare Conſilium, 

- ibid 

0 Rep! gd Def non requiſivet Cendiiun, 


* 1 r per Rien Arrere & lIſſue inde, _ 4 
J d' non conceſſit Annuitatem, & "Iſſue, 147 
© Bar per Levy per Diſtreſs, & 1 qe non 
©. levavit, | ibid. 
* Par per Feoffment fait Ihe indy, ibi 
Several Bars pleaded, bid. 
Several Judgments cited, 1348 
Bar per Nil debet infra ſex Annas, ii 


Bar in Debt fur cuir. 1 55 
Bar # in Debt far e 


TIL debet per Patriam, | 25 1 149 
N d' fecit Script Ob! pro ples folt- 
"< tiohe denar?, Et Rept” qd” hon fecit "hid. 
q Qa. ſolvit denar pro Terris vendit” 182 #bid, 
Qd' emebat Oves ſub ons Ae ” ibid 
. F Emiſſet de Mercimon), deins 
Age, & ſimile al Mutuat', Ne mu- 
© tuar? qd' fuit plene Etat, 2 "at Emile 
© qd; Mercimon' fuer' pro necoſlar e 


. 


& t Me, & ye inde, 1 150, 
„ IE ; ; 1 
. F | | * to 188 
$3.7 
& -. e 192 i& ar 
\ * 9 
Tt) Fx 


SF Ya. TS... 


Er a co } Sn...” ASS 


_— 
— 


— 


* 4 by " n * * 1 F ”y 4 p - A 
- . - x » x7 * " > RR.” 1 TT 7 » 
* * : , * 1 * 1 * % 
. p oy * Ie 
: * * 
% 1 


TITTY. * . 0 ” | : as * a 
* , ' * * 1 * Þ * 


# * | 
LY * 1 s 3 * a3 * F 
- 


#. | 1 * 


_—_ 44 > * c 1 2 | 
we TABLE. | 
Bar in Debt ſur Eſcape. Vide p. 127, Ge. 

Bar in Debt ſur Muuat. 


© CAD' Quer* accommodavit ei denar', ſub 


6 Conditione non petformat'; Traverſe, 
© Repl & Iſſue, Page 152, &Cc: 
Non debet denar mutuar”, 154 


Bar in Debt ſur Arbitrement ſans Specialty. 


Bar in Debt ſur Amerciament. 


; ONE per Legem, Quer' moratur', 


F | & Def jung' in morac, 154, 1 
Nil debet per — * & Iſſue, * oe 
© Bar qq Def fuit de al Fraternitat', & De- 
© murr” inde, | 155, 156 
Bar qd Def nunquam jurat' fuit obſervare 
© Ordinationes, - l 


Bar, That he the Defendant had not taken the 
Sacrament, Secundum Statut', and the Bar 


held good after Exceptions, ibid. 
1. Except. to the Narr. as a By-Law to 
bind all the Inhabitants, 157 


2. For want of Allegation of the Day of 
electing the Defendant, Er Judic pro 
Def”, 157, 158 

Upon an Amercement in a Leet, where upon a 
Demurrer is ſhewn how, and by whom, the 
Affeerment ought to be. +158 
Upon a By-Law not to uſe his Trade, id 
Upon a Common-Council-Man's reſigning his 
Aaazx Office, 


1 
* 
K 7-5. r ̃w 3 ES 


1 
— 


* 
— —— 


1 » 
A 
— : _— — 2 2 


aut —ů c ——ůðͥ—Adt d — — 4 — _ 
_ Bn — Xo. 
—— — — © —_ 


1 


22 — — 
7 


0x O09 
* = . 


: R 1 e * + 


* 


The T AB L E. 


Office, Bar per Nil debet, Iſbe, & Verdig 


* nn 
9 
* 9 


= E 


pro Quer Page 139 
Several Exceptions to the Verdict Greer 
2 | 88 ibid. 
Bar in Debt ſur Statute Leg. 
Vide peſtea Bar per Statute Ley. 


Ebt upon Statute 8 Eliz., for arreſting in 
the Name of another without his Con- 
ſent; Defendant 2 Non Gut, Iſue, Ver. 
dit pro Quer, & Dampna, ec. in Tripla, 160 


Simile againſt an Attorney of the Common. Plea, 


Bar per Nil debet & Iſſue, p 161 
1. Except, For that the Statute was milre- 
ed. ibid. 

2. That an Attorney is not within the Sta- 
tute, 8 . 4-7 1+ 5M 

3. That the Action does not lie before the 
Conviction, ; 1,4} 1 468. 

4. That proſecuting a Writ out of C. B. is 
not within the Statute, 5 462 


Proteſtando non levavit Querelam, pro pla. 
« 


© cito non cauſavir prefat” R. arreſtari, ibid, 


Nil deber, al Narr in debiio ſur 2 E4. 6. 


+ for not ſetting forth Zyt bes, i 
Bar, That the Lands were Tythe free, as Parcel 
of a late diſfolved Priory, „ Ni 163 
* Nil debet per Patriam, al Statute de Perjury 
5 Eliz. c. 9. i ibid, 
Non commilit perjur' voluntar' & ye, 164 
Nil debet per Patriam, to an Action again 
* an Informer for making Compoſition witho 
Licence. Verdict & Judic', ibid. 
Nil debet, to Aion on 5 Eliz. againſt a Sur- 
+ weyor of the High-ways for nit ſtopping a : 1 
rid. 
| Uron 


Pr 


The TABLE 


has 21 H. 8. ca. 13. for taking a Fam 
Demiſe for Leas Bar, That the De- 


| ſerclari had not lufficient Glebe, Rep?” &- 


Traverſe, * $922 Page 165 
* Bar per Vicarium, Q non tent ad Fir. 
mam, N ibid. 


Upon 21 H. 8. ca. 1 1 Non-Reſidence, 
Bar qd ipſe Def eff yo Lajews, & Demurr? 


inde, 9, a 
) Oljerv. 1 1. That a weer Lay-man may 
8 be Parton de fatto, . 101. 


2. How ihis Statute Night to be pleaded, i. 

| "3 _ a Parſiament begun and Proro- 
gu f 167 

b nn pleads 27 fair candle, Epiſepi 


ar to the Stat. 25 Car. 2. (Appel l Teſt Aa) 
That he had taken the Oaths,e5e. Rey non, Cc. 
— demurs, Et Falle pro Be. hid. 


ar per Nil debet, upon 5 Eliz. fot uſing the 


"Trade of a Tallow. Chandler, 169 
Obj. If che Action did lie at W 
Et Cur' adviſare vult, ce. ibid. 


reg s of London pleaded to an Indictment 
for uſing the Trade of A Woollen- -Draper, 


150 

To Seaturs 33 H. g. ca, 9. 8 bft illegal Gaming, 
Bar qd non cuſtodivit Communem Domum Lu. 
dendi pro Lucro, & c. * ibid. 
ladictment ſor keeping a Common Tippling- 
houſe, quaſh'd for the ill Concluſion, 171 
Obſervations upon the Statutes againſt Gaming. 
houſes, ibid. & 172 
References to Precedent relating to Gaming, 
Oc, | 173; Cc. 
Upon 23 H. 6. for exerciſing the Office of 
an Under-Sheriff, Bar per Privilege at At- 
torn C. B. Quer moratur, Oc. 175 

| Obh/. 1. 


. ey * 6 
4 A —_— > 'F) * N 2 4 * 
N mM 9 bd Sb WE, 
ue FE; n 4 n * 6 
TIE N E : 
- * _ 1 
< » : 
b uw 


The TAB LE 


/ 1. That this is the Suit of the Party; IN Sin 
xj altho' the King. is to bare 7 — Sc. 1 
5 age 176 1 
* 2.  Jodgment for — a Plea in A. 1 1 
tement as if in Bar; alſo as to begin. +£ 

ning a Plea in Abatement, with Acfio. 


nem non, G o W. 1577 
As to Perſons excepted out of the above. 
„ Act, ibid. 


Bar per Attorn? Privile e. Repl, That he 
540 leſt off bil Praice. . Demutrer, and he 
was found Attorney on Record, 178 

= ay How the Cuſtom of W 
** E ht to be alledged, * | 
2. W A a Demurrer 0a Pla 

in Abatement are not examinable, ibi, 

Upon Stat. 1 Hen 5. for the Sheriffs returning 
one as duly dead a Patliament — tho 
not . within . jor 

nce infra Com raverſe al Reſiaence, 

; Regs Lis fidence & Iſſue, 179, &+. 
Al Aﬀjon', for not returning the Plaintiff a 
Knight of the Parliament. Bar, That he 
was not elected by the greater Number, E 
Ie inde, | 180 

Action upon AF. de Will. 3. for a falſe Return of 
2 Burgeſs of Parliament, Bar ad inde 5 eund 
Statut, ibil. 

Al Action for ſelling a Horſe againſt the Statute . 
af 3x Eliz. ca, 12. Bar per Nil debet, Et Tſui 
A ceo, 13 2-00 | 

Obi. If the Plaintiff in a popular Action, 
"Than have Coſts, and it ſeems he ſhall MF * 
not, 181. 
To an Action of Debt * Recuſancy. Bar by 
a former Conviction, Et Demurrer inde, 191” 

Where Conviction is 2 Bar to an Informer, . 
6 70 

Simill 


2. "That: the Declaration was too dl 
and how the Declaration in this Caſe 

.- ..oupht to conclude, : ibid. 
Upon Action for reſcuin 2 Diſtiek of Corn 
—— for Rent. Ob. If Notice of the 
Diſtreſs in ſuch Cale be neceſſary; alſo 
where the Action ought to be laid, 155. E 


Debt againſt; the King's Treaſurer for Moneys 
due to the King. receiv'd of the ' Plaintiff, 
and not paid, &. grounded on Statute 
Ed. 6. Defendant m_ Proteſt ando demurs to 
Do Narr?, placito non recepit contra formani 
Statuti, Perk & Judic pro Def, 186 
o Debt on Statute J2 H. B. ca. 9. againſt 
maintaining a Suit for Lands, &c. Bar per 
Nil debet & Iſue, 8 187 
o Debt upon the ſaid Statute of Aae 
by Bill in B. R. Bar, That he was made 
4 Attorney by Deed, and therefore retgin- 
another Attorney, and traverſes the 
Maintenance, 188 
Similis Bar, 189 
by Warrant of Attorney inrolled im the 
Cauſe, 193 ibid. 
bar per Retainer ut Attorn', RepP per denar propr 


. 0 & & = 8 OB AS WToarnd to Ab omen Ru... ds 


| > 


al da al For, Exit , & 2 dic 8 Quer, Cc. 
81 ibid. 
oi \ wile per Retainer ut Concib, 3 2 ibid. 
182 diveral Bars in Maintenance, as per Non 2 
id 
Wi. er: Nul tie! Record? & Iſſue, ibid. 


mill 5 „ Si mile, 


, ans n 1 
* * W on a) n n 9 5 TR 1 * 3 * 
_—_— ee * n E Wl 3 "A. va * 0 - 
* Fo . o * * * * i. © * . * 
5 > "AF": 7 : * 


4 4 , = * 9 


Simile, 2s Surety for the Obligor, - Page 199 
9882 Servant, &. | ibid. 
Simile, as a Covſin; rand Rel, Ther be ge 
of dis own Money, F022 8/7 
To, Action of: Debt for a Gender ab - 
to prevent the Plaintiff s Execution, 
een Stat. 13 Eliz. cap. 5, Bar, That the 
Stranger did not give or grant the "faid Good; 
contra formam Statuti, Oc. 190, 191 
To: upon * Server of Mortuaries, 
21 H. 8. cap. 6. d' non cepit dimm 
eontra formam — ry adic pe Lui, 192 
T0 Debt ar Star- 5 H. 6. cap. 16. agaitrſt an 
Eſcheator, ſor taking an Inqueſt not ret 
by ide Sheriff Bar, That it Was return 
dy the Sheriff, er Wer inal (7 97 e 
Ml Statute pur Extartiow de probate de Teſt amen, 
Bar per Nil deber per Patriam, © 193 
Faire ſar Star de Perjury, 5 Eliz. bid 
Sins vers” Proſecutor in le Court del Ner- 
13 R. 2. & 5. Oc. | | 


Sail, upon Fear. 8H.6. for tende Ene | 


bid, 


Bo; in De oy ns 6 Mine, 3 


Bier: R per  duritiano Imepriſenment de Covina qu. 


22 J Ce, e 
fuit ad Largim, 159 

Alit pu Orr del ObP per Actian non, lid 
Aliter per Onerari non debet, Rep! ut ſupra 0 
Ape, $f 
Sur Scire Fac & Bar per Releaſe, Rep? per Dureſ 
4 —_— N 74 fait 4d Largurn, 11 


LA 


Re 


71 5 


83 - * Ma 7 Das 
6. tat 4 N 2 
* 


"The * T A BI L E 
Jeg ge Dur plead od, "That it was for 
2 juſt Debt, with raverls es of 23 and 
Iſſue thereon, N g age 1 ; 
Bar, by a Mayor and Community per . 

ment del Mayor, , 
Bar per Dares 5 upon a Bond for Appearance, 


Fe 4d D fir capt per Copia ſur Indi&. 
ment, ibid. 
Demur , Et Exce 4. Caption o. 198 
Bar per Minas to an Action by the Chambers. 
lain of London, Sur Ob”, Rep? 4d fuit ad 
lergum, | _ 199 
ler per Onerari non debet, Et Rept ex ſpomanea 
Volumtat', | 199, 200 
Narr per Baron" & Ur A Bar per Mi- 
2. Quer', Rept i Dif" foi «d 
Iſſue 

. F Minat fuit per alia, G r. ode 
liter per onerari non deber, Quia de verberations 
Impriſonament' & 4 Damps' corporal”, Cc. 


20 
liter per Action non, 


& K 777 9 
iſonament”, & Repl qa fruit 202 
— reanions upon theſe Pleas of Por Dan 
Minas, Cc. 
As when Dureſs ſhall be intended, W a 
' double Plea, when the Replication an- 
ſwers not the Bar, Cc. ibid. 
Upon a 1 that the Bond was in- 
... rolled, ibid, 
Upon a Dureſi per Us' Def, G. ibid. 
Where the Priſoner was no Relation to — 
tendant, 
Where the Defendant was charged for ſteal. 
ing his own Horſe, ibid. 
Dureſs muſt be where the Bond was ſealed | 


Re I Adio 


r | 


7 - n a 
oe \ 0 A as 
5 : * 8 * * * 
9 * * 4 | 
* T7 | | 
H 
. > 
, LEY" * 


abs 


_ ** A 
i * 
= 8 1 
00 
* 
* n * 


9 Tm" F 'S * N "BY as * FOR * * . i 
os + od 2. 5 O90 
, , ” 1 
. we * = N % 7 4 \ 
The TA EE. 
„ , . ” a9 


1 2 © Pape 20, 
| Where Dureſs ought to be pleaded'ſpecially, 
A. | nn 3 20 
. Cog Ad ionem after Per Minas pleaded, iid, 
| eſs may be where the Party is in Pri: 
8 8 Sn by the King's Writ, = ibid, 
Ki Bar per Coverture G- Deins Age. Fo 

AR per Feme 4 fuit Cooperta tempore en, ... © 


fectionis ſcripti. Repl' qd' fuit ſola, 206 Fo 
Bar d fuit 2 Rep! 74 fait ſola, ibid 


Bar per Def qd” Quer die Orig pros fuit Cooper. 11 
ta, Rep! qd 2 fait, Beuel 77 fi 
Cooperta, . Rejo' & Iſſue, "1; 
4 Geer fait Cooperta tempore exhibit Bill, ii 
Alter per Def qd fuit Cooperta tempore Leva 
tion Ouerele, ” a 
Aliter per = „ © Repl qd fuit ſola, lil 
Weta, That Feme Covert may be given i 
Evidence, 5 _ 
Bar per Dient Age, & plede onerari non debt 
RepP qd fuit plenæ ętatis, 200 
Similis Bar ſur Contract, _” 
Similis Bar ſur Emiſſet, & Rep inde, 210 
Simili Bar al Oh, Rep & Iſſue, bh 
Rept d indebitat fuit pro Medicamemt, 21 
RepP qd Apparat fuer neceſſar & convenien, Nu 
5 non fuer, &c. 4, "8 
nfant's Bond, how avoidable, ji 
Defendant pleads Dein: Age, and Diſagreement 
to the Demiſe, "=, on 
His Submiſſion to Arbitrement avoidable, 21} 
His ſealing a Bond after Date, ch 
If his Bond be good for Things ſuitable, i 
If a fingle Bill may be good, though a Bot 
not, 100 
F N 4 | Hol 


" |; | ö 5 a 7 oy * F ; ” 
* L. . , * a 4 * LY 7 ” 74 *. 


How if * Bord be Whol Penaty, and how 


if of double Value, Page 214 
Where the Infant afficm'd himſelf to be of — 
Age, 1 
Where be he ſhall have Error or Deceit againſt an 
Attorney, 215 
Infants bound by their neceſſary Contracts 
and ſingle Obligations, | 22 


For what Neceſſaries, but not upon an Tone 
comput aſſet, | 

For Meat, Drink, and Learning, "= 
If it be to maintain his Trade, bid. 
If Infant ſells Goods for' Money, "+ es, 
If Infant ſells in a Market-Overt, his. 


0 Sons Fadi pleaded. he 


; 
. 


21 7 
|: Non eft Nabe Teſtatorit, COWS, 
12 where R. C. was bound by the Name 7 
WW.” + 
y Concerning the miſtaking of Names i in 2 1 
00 


10 Edward bound by the Name of Ed,, 219 
Concerning another Name at Parties Confir. 
mation, ibid. 
1. bound by the Name of F. S. how to 
Rej cler &, ibid. 
Concerning F. P. the Father, and 7. P. the 
ih don, ibial. 
or 1 the Date and Delivery of Bonds, 
| c 220 
" pon a Bond dated the 24th, and ſealed the 
27th, ibid. 
pon a Bond delivered Amo 23. but dated 
Amo 24. ibid. 


Re- 


— 
"The FABLE. 
Relief to Defendant by Special Pleading 


age 220 
Where the Deſcendant ſigned and wn 
then laid the Bond upon the Table, 221 


Bond co pay 4 Sept, 2 Fac an "uf * 
> Fae ys 


As to Primo deliberat®, "7 ibid 
As to Delivery after the Condition, 3 is icmpol 
ſible, „ 


Where the Delivery i is rraverſable, „ or _ 
Concerning Obligations, Sc. joint and Gro 
Upon a Joint Bil, & Simile on a Joint Ou 


gation, ibi 
_ . Where, Three are bound, and the Action 
only againſt Two, „ 1 
Where Bond to Two, and the Executor of 
"the Survivor bring the Action, ibid 
Where ſurviving Obligee brings the Action 
without naming the. other, al 


Where Fonr are bound Et eme ve 


214 
Where Jointly bound, bur ſealed ſeventh 
Where Two bind Quernlibet 3 vel utrams 


noſtrum, . this, 


and the Action againſt Two, hid 
Where Three are bound Et quemlibet of 
conſunttim, 225 
If one can bind himſelf to Three, and to end 
wa gp J Bond b Th py 
ere. upon a Joint Bon ree, th 
Count Þs general, * ih 


If Two are bound jointly, and one 150 7 


a Bet, 


Where Three are bound jointly and ſereralh 


— —— AY RV ad 


2 + XP 


The TABLE. 
Bar, That the Bond was made to them Two, 


= 


and one B. ' Page 226 


2. Secondly, Where Non eſt Factum is pleaded 
ſpecially. ibid. 
Bar, That the Plaintiff deliver'd up the Bond 
as an Acquittance, and aſter took it again 
Vi & Armics, | ibid. 
Or, That che Defendant afterwards loſt it, w 
aꝛnd the Plaintiff found it, ibid, 4 
Bar, for that the Plaintiff razed and alter'd the 
Bond after Delivery, 1827 
Rep!”, That the Razure and Alteration was 
with the Defendant's Conſent, with a 
Traverſe, Rejoinder and Iſſue, 227, 228 
How the Deed by Razure becomes no Deed, 228 
Concerning Razure before or after Delivery, 


EE = 22 * 2 „„ <4 _ a. I.  SIO@©DS CP IH 


| | | 229 . 
Bar per Razure after Delivery, ibid. 
Bar per Interlineat ion Bille after Delivery, and 
Iſſue, W een 
Simile, 231 
Simile al ObP, where the Indenture was inter- 
lined, Cc. ibid. 
Of altering a Deſeaſance, Sc. 232 


Sheriff 's Bond interlined after Delivery, ibid. 
How Non eſt Factum after a Deed raz d, ibid. 
Deed altered without the Privity of the Wg, 
| 70% 

If by a Stranger in Words not material, bid. 
Bar qd ſcript” Ob ſigillat' & deliberat fuit cum 
ſpacii & inter vallis, and altered by a Stranger, 
233 

Rep!, Qd' ſpacia & inter valla reliff fuer cum 
aſſenſu Def fore implet 234 
Rejo, Per manutention placiti, & Travers, 


- Replic* Quer, 235 
B b b Sure 


N hs 2 5 C p 7 * 4 es wk AS 18 * 7 ** N : * * One * * * 
7 | : +. N 
* 7 1 
| Th | 'T A B L E. 
C ' 


Sarrejo' per manntention, Rey & Exit ſuper. 
ind, Page 236 
Upon the Day being leſt out, and put in after 


Delivery, ibid. 


That Factum predict was deliver'd without a 
Date, and afterwards Date put in, ibid. 
Bar per Deletion & Obliteration in Indorſamento 
ſcripti, Rejo' qd non, Et Exit inde, " "237 
Bar, Non eſt Factum ſpecial” promifl:@ur* de Con. 
dition, Et qd Def fuit homo Laicus & minime 


Literatus, & Iſſue inde, 237, 238 
Aliter qd fait Laicus & minime Literatus, & Obs ei 
miſiectꝰ & expoſit' fuit, 239 
Bar per Exec qd Teſtator fuit homo Laicus, Fe 
| ibid, 

Bar per Releaſe, Rep! 7 ipſe Laicus conceſſit fa. 
cere Relaxation de debito tantum, 240 


Bar, That the Writing was read to him as for 
Ten Marks only, and not for Twenty Pound, 


ibid, 

Simile de Indentur', | 241 
Bar non eſt Pactum, per eo qd Def conceſſit facer 
ſeriptum cum alia Conditione, ibid, 
Bar that the Condition was wanting, 242 


Simile, and lets forth the Condition, 1610 
That it was read to him as with a Condition 


ibid 
Note, as to falſe Reading, | ibid 
Bar per Non eſt Factum, Eo qd' Def deliberavi 

ſeriptum ut ScheduP, 244 

Od deliberavit ſcriptum ut Schedul, bi, 
Q4 Simile, with Reference to an ———_— 

ibi 
With Reference to an Indenture, c. ibid 


To the Delivery up of a Bond, Sc. ibid, 


With Reference to a Marriage, ibi 


Bar, 


2 — F Gy „e 


Bar, That he delivered the Writing to V. to be 
delivered to the Plaintiff's Teſtator; That 
V. tender'd it, but the Teſtator refuſed it; 
and then /. left it with him as a Schedule, 

f Page 243, 244 

Note, As to the Tender of a Bond, and Refu- 
ſal to accept it, 244 

If Baron diſagrees to a Bond made to his Feme, 
| 244, 245 

Delivered to be his Deed if Defendant paid nor 
40 245 

Bar by Delivery, with Reference to a Coun- 
terbond to ſave Detendant harmleſs, à [cripto 
in demand, Cc. ibid. & Simile 246 

Delivery, with Reference to a Releaſe to be 
made to the Defendant, 247 

Simile, with Reference to an Annuity to be 
made, ibid, 

Simile, with reſpe& to a Deodand, ibid. 

Simile, with reſpect to a Relief, ibid. 

Simile, upon a Diſcourſe to be had concerning 
Money paid, ibid. 

Bar, with reſpect to 200 Barrels of Salt to be 
firſt delivered, 248 

Simile, with reference to a Defeaſance, ibid. 

Notes as to the Delivery of a Bond, Cc. as an 
Eſcrow or Schedule, ibid. 

How the Plea may or muſt conclude, ibid. 


That the Bond was falſly read; and further, 


that it was delivered as an Eſcrow, &c. on 
Condition, 249 
How it may and ought to be deliver'd as an 
Eſcrow, but not to the Party himſelf, ibid. 
Let, where the Rep, Cc. will make that Plea 


good, 250 


tion precedent, ibid. 
Bbb 2 Deli- 


$03 bout” 


Delivered to V. as a Schedule, to be delivered 
over «t Seriprum, and faith not ut Faftum, 


Page 250 

How. an Eſcrow may be given in Evidence, 
251 

If Defendant be obliged to perform Things in 
the Deed, ' ibid, 
Words to be uſed upon a Delivery, as an 
Eſcrow, ibid, 
Concerning the Seal of a Deed being broken 
off, ibid, 
Seals eaten with Mice and Rats, ibid. 
Where, if one Seal be torn off, it ſhall not avail 
the other Parties, | 252 
Concerning a Seal being reaffixed, ibid. 
Seal pull'd off after Iſſue join'd, ibid. 


How a Stranger to the Deed ought to Re, 
Where the Party muſt conclude Non eſt Factum, 


ibid, & 253 
When he muſt conclude Judgment Si 48s, 
C 253 
1 a Deed he made void by Act of rage 

| ibi 
If Non eff. Tuctum and Demurrer, ibid. 
After Non eff Factum, Matter to be given in 
Evidence, 1 * ibid, 
Executor leaded Non eff Fe um ſuum, Iſue 
& Jade pro Quer poſt Verdict, * 2 


If Non eſt Fact um to a Deed inrolled, 254 
Judgment upon Nen eſt Factum, how to be en- 
aa hid. 
Upon Relicta verificatione cogn —_ ibi. 


Bar 


„ 


The TABLE 


Boe in Debt ** It Gage, 


* R per Rien luy doit per Ley . 
Page 254 

Ubi Def Vad' Legem & fee Aefalt', 255 
Di Quer fer” 22 f Did. 
Def * Legem ſnam, Ex dit eſt Attorn' Def” 
c 256 

Bal al al vend' & Manger per Rien buy doit per 52 
Ley inftanter, ä ibid. 
Quoad 8 I. reſid', Bar per Surrender del Def”, 
Rep qd non ſurſum reddidit, & Iſſue inde, 

257 

Reference to Precedents concerning Ley 
Gager, ibid. & 258 
If the Defendant ſhall wage Law againſt an 
Attorney, 258 


Bar in Debt by Forein Attachment pleaded. 


HE Cuſtom of London of a Forein At- 

tachment, pleadedi in Bar of a Bond up- 

on an Attachment in the Mayor's Court, 

y 258, 259, Cc. 

Bar by an Attachment in the Sheriff's Court, 

Talus, without a Cuſtom ſpecially alledg- 
ed, | 272, Cc. 

Simile i in Cur Vie London, & demurr inde, 276 
Simile in Cur Majoris, Ce. Civit Exon, Cc. 
ibid. 


Bar in Debt per Statute Ley. 


Eferences to Statutes pleaded in the Fourth 

Part of Inſtrutfor Clericalis, 277, Oc. 

The Act for exempting Proteſtant Diſſenters 
pleaded, 278, 279, Ce. 
Bbb3 Bar 


0 


"The TABLE | 


Bar þ er Statut 3 Fac. vert Attorn' quia non dedit 
Alen, ſub manu, pleaded againſt an Attor- 


ney's Executrix, ; Pape 283, Cc. 
Bar per Stat 16 Car. 2. contra Luſum ad alea, 
. 285, Or. 


Aliter, Secunlluw, 1 Tea, Entr. rr. 484, Ce. where 
the Action was upon a Wager concerning 

a Caſt at Back. Gammon, 288, Cc. 
Plaintiff demurr'd, Et Judi pro Quer, that 
this Gaſe was not within the Statute, 292 
Error was thereupon brought, and Judg- 
ment reverſed, and fqr what, ' 293, Oc. 


Obſervations upon Statute 9 & 10 Ann, againſt 


Gaming at Cards, Dice, Ce. 295 


Statute aſ Vſury pleaded, 12 Car. 2. ca. 13, 


Setundum, 1 Lutw. 467, Cc. 297, Cc. 


Action was upon Bond * Mone lent upon 
Adventure of the Obligor's Life, ibid. 


Argued pro On Quer”, that this Contract was not 
uſurious, ee 


Aliter per Statut — Uſury, PROBES 1 Saund. 
292. For that after the Bond the piaimiff 
cortuptly receiv d of the Defendant 30 /. for 
Forbearance, 302, Ce. 
Judic pro Quer, for that an Uſurious Con- 
tract made after the Loan avoids not — 
Bond, 304 
But yet the Plaindff had forfeited the treble 

Value, ibid. 


Linde Bill — Bottgmry, with expreſſi ive In- 


tereſt, there being three Contingents, 304, 

C, 

r a Leaſe for 3091, at 35 1. ger Annum, 
\ four Yeats, 3905 
No Uſi wy without a 2. Oe, bid. 
Where hs Statue myll he pleaded, i bil. 


Par; 


to be void if he paid $50 K at the end of 


” * ** 4 9 U . . ot. * * ” 1 * T7 . 7 + * 18 * N : * * . 4 * , * 
5 * 5 * 7 
p * : 
1 N * - - 
The ö T B | E. 


r= Oh OOTY Page 305 
Bar, That he was to pay 33 /. if E. was alive, 


and if not, then only 26 L of 30 l. borrowed, * 


| | | | big, 
Bar, That the Bond for 30 J. was a Security for 
Oil bought, and that he could have bought 


it for 25 J. ready Money, 306 


Similis Bar al ObP & Recogn. RepP qd” ſcript” 
Ob fat? fuit ſuper bonam Confiderationem, ibid. 


Simile, and Ulury traverſed, ibid. 

| Simile al placit pro differend diem, bid,” 
That the Plaintiff had Common of Paſture for 
lending 20 J. RepP qd non, ibid. 
Thar Plaintiff reſerv'd 2 /. per Men, for 60 J. 
2 307 


Bar per Statut & 5 l. pre mauibus ſolut”, ibid, 
Quer reſeryavit 6 l. pro quarter Anni, ibid. 
That the Defendant lent 20 l. and took three 
ſeveral Bonds for Payment of 10 J. ibid. 
Bar to Debt upon Bond, by Statute 5 Ed. 6. 


againſt ſelling of Offices, 308 
Simile, concerning the ſelling the Office of an 
Under-Sberiff, | 315 


Upon an Action of Debt for Tythes, Bar al 
part per Nil debet, al reſid proteſt ando, Cc. 
Pro placito, ſets forth ſeveral Statutes and De- 
ſcents from one King to another, 317 
To an Action by the Preſident of the College 
of Phyſicians London. Bar per 34 H. 8. ſor 
any Subject to apply Medicinal Herbs and 
Plaiſters, Cc. 318 
Obſervations upon pleading a Statute, 321 
As for the Statute of Limitations pleaded, ibid. 
4 & 5 Ann, ca. 16. Suits upon Entry and 
Claims to avoid Fines, 323 

As for Seamens Wages in the Admiralty, ibid. 
Liberty tor Perſons beyond the Seas, 323 


B b b 4 Actions, 


4 
1 


1 
; 2 * per Heirr\in Date. 
* P lies againſt an Heir to the Tenth De- 


* How e charged upon the Obligation of his Fa- 


Page 323 


aided after Verdict, 


Action 651 bs in the debes & detinar, * 
KRequiſites to bird an Heir, and of Execution 


= againſt an Heir, by 3 85.4 . & U. 324, 325. 
4% Gre Rrors, how to be preferred in fuch w_ | 


_ Truſts, how liable in ſuch Caſe, | 35 
1 Plaintiff pleads an Intail. Rept, That the Fa- 
| ther died ſeized, ibid. 
Ber per Riens per Diſcent per Elium & Hered, 
Rept 4d habuit ſuficien, 326, 32 &. 

Bar ger Filiam & & Hired, Rien. per Diſcent 
prerer Reverſionem. Plaintiff demurs ſpe- 
cially, 328, 329 
1. Exception, That the Defendant had not 
8 confeſſed the Debt, Fo 
A 2. That it did not appear that the Leſſee 
1 bad accepted the Leaſe, I bid. 
+ 4 That it is not ſhewn that the Reverſion 
1 deſcended to him, with ſeveral Anſwers 
5 thereto, Sed adjornatur, 329, 330 


— 


1 And the Cy prays Judgment, and hath 
it, 


— o, 321 
6 Bar per 330, 33 


Riens per Diſcent preter Rectoriam 


* & tales terras plede per Filium & Hered', 


332 
. Dei“ confeſs, ce. Et Error pro Diſcontinu- 
Y , OM and aliaved, * 2 333 


* "_ 2 * s + a 1 on 2. tt TIF " x N a V Ren * y = 8 ' 
W * ag * T = * "oy 5 * * * EY 1 7 * * 74 6 
- hy as 1 "TY N * = * 9 * 
3 ? | 
* 
« y — 5 * 
28 . 
, . * n 
7 ed 


| f Actions, & Pt, hſm * were be. 


* ther, ibid. 6 


Bar per Diſcent ne Revetſiotem, &c. 


Y — 8 * * ** 


9 _ * — ”m_ FT" "EE TOY Leda 
8 * 4 n * * N * ER G N a * * 2 
a+. . 6 
* 1 a = 0 

w * 
: - 

\ l : = - 

: SN 

9 > ; N — 


par per Frem 8& Hered', Protek non oft 
nr 


1. Page 333 
© Riens per Diſcent per Frem' & Hered' Filii 


& Hered), &c. | 3234 
Riens per Diſcent per Baron & Feme Cohe- 
© re@ preter tertiam part” Meſſuag', &c. 


Riens per Diſcent per Conſanguineum & 


x Hered, Rep qd habuic, 0 335 
Riens per Diſcent per Filias & Cohered, 
Repß gd habuer' fufficien', bid. & 336 
Riens per Diſcent per Aunt and Heir of 6 
* Daughter and Heir, Repl' qd' habuit diver- 


© ſas terras, 336, 337 
The Caſe thereof, ſpecial Verdict, Pedigree; 
Et Fudic* pro Buer, 337. Cr. 


Q Uthe Act of Council is amendable, 339 
Where che Heir in Fee ſhall be charged after a 
Tait determined, 1 $:9..71% 1. Who, 
Ha Reyerſion in Fee upon a general Nm 
_ Diſcent ſhall be adjudged Aſſets, ibid. 
Omiſſion in the Narr. that the Heirs" were 
bound-if amend able, 3338, 240 
That againſt a Collateral Heit the Declaration 
muſt be ſpecial; oo © 342 
Bar G. Cohered' confeſs' le Action, but plead 
over Riens preterr,; jh. 
Repl proteſtando qu Terr non tanti vuloris pro 
placito, qd' babuer a Nm, d. 341 
Riens per Diſcent by Heirs in Gavelkind; and 
one being undet Age, prays the Plaintiff may 
ſtay until his full Age, which is granted, 
and at full Age the Plaintiff comes and prays 

a Relummons, &. 1 342 
Parol Demurre prie pur deux Infants, Coheirs 
pur Infancy d'un deus, and then Plaintiff 
comes and prays a Reſummons, 2 


% 4 


The TABLE 
Se. de Dir de vl, Ting, D. 
ry guard, Page 344, Oc. 

The Heirs in Gavelkind. Bar, That one of the 
Defendants is within Age, e. 345¹ 346 
Nera, Where there are Lands at Common 
Law, and in Gavelkind, | 336 

0 © Bar per Filjum & Hered,, Riens per Diſcent 
* preter tertiam partem tertie partis Manerij 

* & in tres partes Dividend Pk Nc. 
And the Plaimiff tales Judgment r herewpon, 

; 346, Oc, 
. Riens per Filium & Hered' preter kk Terta 

© & Mediecat' in B. & Revercon in D. E 
Judic' inde de Terris & Medietat & dt 

* Reverſione cum acciderit, 348, On, 
Debt was brought againſt two Husbands and 
their Wives, Coheirs, * and Couſin; 
Kiens per Diſcem by one; and the othet 
— Riens preter Reverfuw after the Death 

of Tenant by the Curteſy; and the Plaintiff 

. prays Judgment of the Reverſion, 6. 


N 


Ob Fe ruations and Caſes on this Head of 
Bar per Heirs in Debt. 


F one of the Coheirs be nonſuited, it's 4 


Nonſuit againſt them all, 38 
When Aſſets are fqund only as to one Coy Ve 
4 
Heir, how charged upon Nil dicit, 354 T 
Where the Heir pleads Lands ſer out for Po. 1 
tions, Cc. 1e 
Where the Deviſe is of Lands on the Mother, 
Side, Ml ba 
'Tis-no Plea for the Heir to ſay, the Execute He 
had Aſſets, ibi. 


Demurii 


\ 


2 
- . 
„ 


f * | | 
Ihe T A BL E 
Demurter to ſucha Plea, and good, Page 354 
ter Action depending again Executor, no 
Pes, 0 3557 
pon a Conveyance by Heir 4 Parte Mares 
2 
pon an Act of Parliament, that the Heir of 
one attainted ſhould enjoy, ibid. 
aw Sons of Aliens may be Heirs, ibid. 
ſhether the Action may be in the Debet or De. 
tinet, or both, ibid. 
itake, of Deſendants appearing by his Guar- 
dian, "amendable, 356 
„tere an Heir ſhall not be prejuced by dubi- 
ous Words, ibid. 
That an Heir ought to be expreſly bound, ibid. 
ere the Rent ſhall go to him, tho [Heir 10 
be omitted, 101 
Fhere the Heir may loſe Rent, 
there, upon a Remainder over, no Tail all 
arile, 357 
here, upon a Deviſe to the Wife, the Son is 
in by Diſcent, ibid. 
| we after Entry, Aſſets ſhall not be faid 
to dei in the Heirs Hands, ibid, 
Where the Heir ſhall have the Surplulage, c. 


-er 


— 
%- 


K © 


— cz - 
4 we 


„ ͤ „ . 5” 


ibid. 

here the Adminiſtrator gave a Bond in Diſ- 
charge of the former, ibid, 
(3 pon Rien, per Diſcess Reni by a former 
Wait ſued. 358 
Where the Heir pleads. a Releaſe to the Execu- 
" tors, ibid. 
* here the Heir had levied a Fine, ibid. 
„bere Heir alienates bona fide before an 
| ibi 


eir by Poſſeſſion, how chargeable, 339 
pon Allers being found in tae ge Parts, 


ibid. 
Upon 


The TABLE. 
Upon a Rep" per Alu, bur ſhows 00s the Ply 
| 64 
The the the Place ought to be ſhewn in all Co 

iu 


Ot two ſeveral Judgments, which ſhall 15 1 2 
ſatisſied, 
Where Execution ſhall be only of the Lan 


Where againſt Land and Body, | 
That the Heir ought truly to — | 
Of a falſe Plea upon the Anceſtor's Recogi 
Zance, - 
Heir, where bar'd of his Formedon, I 
Where the Plea conſeſſeth the Bill, and umi! 
"Plaintiff nonſuited, h 


Heir eſtopped aſter knparlatce,” | 
Judgment upon Nil dic , ainſt an Heir, i 
No Enquiry upon a falſe 0 
Erroneous Judgment, where Jury name 
Lands, a 
Of a Judgment quando Reverſio acciderit, a 4 
* the Jury may, or may not, "find 
alue, 


"fer 
2 


* 


Riens per Diſcent preter un Cottagium, Re my E. 
. af Terr, 1 
Bar per Riens per Diſcent per Filium & * m0 

30 | 

Simile, & Rep? 4 babuit ſulſicien lie Orig Ui * 


* re verſa fuit, &. 364, K 
bridgment 3 & 4 . & M. to prevent Frail 


ils, Se. nd how Actions and Exed 
120 may be againſt Heirs at Law and Del 

: ſees 365, 366, 6 Nar 
How Heirs, Tertenants, Executors and M o 
miniſtratots, are by Statute 8 & 9 NM. 1 1 
ble to Execution upon a Judgment on a in ! 

or penal Sum for Non- -performance of O [ 
venants, 


The TABLE 
ven ſeveral Matters may be pleaded, accord. 
ig to 4 & 5 Ann. ca. 16. Page 368 


. 


al | Suit de Executors & Admini- 
6 ſtrators in debito. "4 
9 e ; 
AR by Abatement, for that the Teſtator 
I was alive Die inperracon' brevis, RepP 4 
i "mw, Rejo qd fait, Surrejo' qd? obiit ante diem 
"ny inpetrac' brevis, 368 
Ho a Plea beginning in Bar, and conclu- 
ding to the Writ, ſhall be taken, 369 
limilis Bar per Exec, Et Judic pro Quer, ibid. 
ili Bar ſans ſpecial Averment, Et Fudic* 
* Def” | Sid. 
re, "if there be two Plaintiffs, or two De 
ſendants, and one of them die, the Action 
uy” ſhall r 8 & 9 V. 3z. Ge. 37 
Traverſe, that 4. died Inteſtate, ibid, 
ver Adm, qd Lre Adm per ipſum obrent 
 revocat” fuer. Rep? by an Appeal from the 
W ſaid Sentence to the King in Chancery. 
Et Demurrer inde cum Cauſit, 370, 371, 373 
r Action per Exec, Defendant pleads a Exec 
non nominat, and traverſes that the Teſtator 


Je 
0 
bd 


6 


made the Plaintiff ſole Executor, 374 
WBar, for that two of the Executors were under 
r 375 
WB 44 —— orc nunquam fuit commiſs* 
Lem, Er Rep 9d fut, "bid 

Similis Bar, & Similis RepP, 376 


Narr. by R. and F. Executors of K. Executtix 
of H. S. Bar, that H. died Inteſtate, and 
Traverſe that he made K. Executrix, ibid. 

In Debt upon a Bond by an Executrix, the 
Defendant pleads in Abatement, That the 
Teſtator was an Alien. RepP per Licene Do- 

mini 


jy 


Fl 


n . " 4 4 4 p * " 9 * 3 * lb £& ys | * * * 2 9 „ 
* 9 Na * R n n wm oy : F I} viel * 4 ** .. 2 4 
V * * 1 * * ** th ** 8 * . "7 . - - * 1 2 For \- » - * * * 7 TY Y 
, 8 * * KY o at. 
— 4 5 r 8 
: 


* 
The TABLE. 
min Regis, Demurr & Ref} pond” oa egard 
age 
Debt per Adm ſur Obl' Abatement, That 6 Tc 
.2 well the two others named in the Bond u 
. the Defendant obliged themſelves jointly, {| 1 
N Quer demurr, & reſpond ouſter agard, 375 N 
| © Def* Exec, plead auter Action pendant al Te 
- © part, Et demurr” al reſid', Rep! per nau 
KI * tiel Record' & joinder in Demurr' al reſd, Ml. 
| ibid 
© Rejo' q@ eſt tiel Record', Et Judic' pro - 
Quer, 379 | 
Several Exceptions to a Narr. aſter Verdid 
given for the Baron, Adminiſtrator of h pg, 
Wife, Sed non allocantur, ibid. 
To an Action brought by an Executrix upon: 
Bail Bond; (and the Inteſtate being na « | 
named in the Writ or Count as late Sheriff) 
Defendant pleaded Statute 23 H. 6. E fo 


dic pro Def”, c | 
References to Bars againſt Executors and Ad. 
0 miniſtrators mentioned in the Fourth Par 
N of Inſtructor Clericalis, &c. 380 K 
As Bar by Maintenance, ibid, 
I By Performance of Covenants generally. W 7 
Rep”, Breach and Demurrer, ibid, 


To an Action by Adm duran' minoritat'. Bar, 
That after the laſt Continuance he attained 
to 21 Years, „  - 

To an Executor of an Executor of Aſſignes o 
Bar, that he was ready to pay the Rent ur 0, 
on the Land, Ce. 381 87 

Bar per non eſt Factum, to an Action brought h 
Adminiſtrator, upon a Covenant to pay , B. 
the Inteſtate, | ibid 

Bar al Action per Adm, Q4 Def ipſe eff Ext 
Simul cum T. B. Et traverſe 4d J. obiit ir 


teſtat 87 
at, : 1 


. 


* 5 * A 
* „*** s of Fab 
7 N 3 4, — a tos} 525 C 7 * * 
* n 1 af 


ALLAH # 
* 


1 * oy _ 1 n 0 * 
og 
ah * 44 3 
© * 4 « 4 * 
2 1A : 


To Action by Executor of A. upon à Bond 
made to A. and P. Bar d D. ſurvived 
A. 1 1 Page 382 
To an Action by an Executor of V. A. a pre- 


tended Survivor of two Obligees. Bar 24 
W. G. ſuper vixit W. A. & traverſe qd W. A. 


ſupervixir, RepP & Exit, * 
To an Action by one of full Age, Bar qd Adm 
duran Minoritat relaxavit Def, Rept Rejo 
Exit, , ibid. 
In Debt by an Executor. Bar, That the Te- 

ſtator, by another later Will, made the De- 

fendant 1 „ Replꝰ Fu Yue, 

Et in Rep! pro ipſo C. lege per ipſum C. 4 
Bar, That I bad obtained his Age, and wok 

Adminiſtration upon himſelf, Travers & 

Demurr inde, 38 
© Bar al Adm' per al Adminiſtration' Lon 

M. qui dedit Def' generalem Relaxation? 

©. &c. ibid, 
Bar ꝗd' Inteſtat' habuit bona notabilia, Et 

© ideo Lre' Adminiſtration” Def? revocat' 

© fuer? &c. 255 2386 
* Similis, Bar de bonis Notabil', Et Exit' qq' 

© non, ibid, 
To Action by Executor upon a Bond to pay 

Money according to Teſtator's Will. Bar, 

That he named no Perſon. Rep!, That he 

made the Plaintiffs Executors, and Deſen- 


giant had not paid. Defendant demurs, ibid. 


N ſolvit per manus alterius, 38 
04 Inteſt ate fuit felo de ſe, ibid. 
Similis Bar, Repl per Act del Pardon, & Fadic 
pro Def” 5 | 1 ibid. 
Bar, That the Inteſtate was attainted of Bur- 
glary, Cc. ibid. 
Al 


8 1 & 1 / 7 
A \ . PR 5 1 5 y 2H - A 
% N : 1.4 if Abit * enn 1 
"Tp W 
Ty Fg: +, * ＋ . * 4 5 i * 
p : 3 
LY 


abt. 


44s ad 4 - INE 9 4 all. "=" 7 
wh Ly * 6h 3 nn * r N 9 
* 4 * * 4 * j . Cy <A&5 CITED 7 _ 
e re . : 
7 y * „ W RY - 0 : —*r 4 at, * - 17 * 4 
„, n FRY A; N 7 . e * * ved » * * * — * 
: £ \ aan. R * e & 4 01 _ 
* kf Wc e 7 3 5 21 4 * R. 7 
$8 . U . 1 - * 3 v * 4 * * 
* 2 4 <<. - . - 4. 3. * 
3 * * 4 ' — | * * 
* It . * * * < 
: . * 
+. - 1 : 
d CY * R * 1 8 


"IK" 7 ak x l 
* ” * * 
„ Þ 
* * - b 


N 2 mortem R. cepit H. in virum o 
S 


II Debt by Executors for Arreatages o 
Aanun 
Bar, 


an 
granted by Deed for Service done] 
hat he refuſed to ſerve. Rep”, Tha 


3 nue offered, and Defendant refuſed it. 77. 
= r 399 %% « 
To Debt by Executor upon Bond. Bar, by 
* R Agreement of Compoſition with the Teſts 
3 tor, "Rep, Demurr & Judgment wy Quer, 
P 5 1 390 
4 To Debt by an Adminiſtrator of K. B. tings 
1 an Act of Parliament, and that the Admi- 


piſtrators of R. B. ſhould not be deprived, 
Ce. Def" meat, Et Judic pro Def, 390 
Here is made a Quzre, Whether the Lands 
were Perſonal Aſſets or not, ibid, 

To an Action upon a Deveſtavit, Def mol, 
Er Fudic pro Def, | 391 
Here it ſeems, that an Executor of an Exe. 

} cntor ſhall not be charged with a Devs 
F. favit made by the Executor of the firl 
A | Teftator, | " ib, 


Bar in Debt per Execntors © Admini- 
 firators. 


DY Abatement, That the Teſtator was alive 
3 at the Time of the Writ purchaſed; 39: 
2 Abatement de Bill, for that another Executot 
I not named adminiſtred together with the 

Defendant, Et Rep! qd non, ibid, 
$ Alitor ſur Bill, & aliter ſur breve, with the 
N . fureſt Way to make Defence in Abatement, 


| 393 
„ | a Aliter 


l 


"x The: TA 31 Ir k. 
Alter ad breve per Arehiegun? „ ants Ire, ; 


| Page 394 
Aliter de Brevi, Er Rey 4 Teſt ator non conſti- 
tuit al Exec, e. 
Simile placitum, Et Rep 44 Teſtator fee Def” 
' ſolum Exec, | 395. 
Bar de altero Exec non nominat' in Brevi, ibid. 
Simile de Altero E vec non noiat in brevi, Et Rep? 
74 obiit ante Orig proſecut, 1 396 
Exec de injur ſua, placitat per Action non, 4d 
Tieſtator conſtituit Executores, CG. 397 


Bar, for that another Adminiſtrator not na- 


med adminiſtred ſimulcum Def”, 398 
Bar 44 ph fuit Exec cum al non noiat, ibid. 
a 


Def in Abatement dic', qd eft Adm cum Teſts 

annex poſt Renunciation Lx, 399 

Placitum qd” S. obiit inteſtat '& Adminico fuit 
— Def, Repl' qd' S. fee” Def Exec, — 
Travers, 

Simile poſt Sequeftratio af per Ordinar, tad, 

Debt' ver un come Adm”, Bar 74 fait Exec” 
ſimulcum al qui Adm, Et travers 44 J. obiit 


Inteſt at, ibid. 
That the Writ is teſted before the Adminiſtra- 
tion, 401 
Bar ad' Def” eft Adm &. non Exec, ibid. 
Where Defendant pleaded he was 5 Adminiſtra- 
tor, but omitted bona Notabilia, ibid. 
Bar * Adminico fuit commiſs alteri, Et travers' 
eſt Exec, 402 


De - th 4d lateſtar habnit bona not abilia, Et 
ideo Lettere Admeon Def commiſs re vocat 
fuer, 8 ibid. 

Bar a S. tent fuit cum B. com unctim, Cc. 

© 

Bar 4d fuit Adm (ro ne bonorum indivers Dioce 5 
Et non Exec A 424, 

Ccc In 


ade TABLE | 


In Debt againſt an Adminiſtrator, he pleads, 
that he is Adminiſtrator Duran minori etat, * 
Et Demurr inde, Et Fudic ver“ Def? ſor 
Default of an Averment, Page 404, 405 

One pleads in Abatement, che other by auer 


Action depending, 496 
Debt for Rent againſt an Executrix of F. upon 
a Leaſe Parol, ibid, 


Abatement, "for that J. died inteſtate, and 
Adminiſtration Was committed to the 
Defendant th bil 

RepP, That ſhe adminiſtred as Executiix be. 
fore Adminiſtration, and that in her own 
Wrong, Def morat', Et Fudic' pro Quer 
. ſur Argument, 407 

Noted, That an Executor of his own 
Wrong cannot retain, tho' an Admini- 
ſtrator might, 408 


References to Bars, cc. by Rus and 
Adniimiftrators, in the Faith Part of 


Inſtruckor Clericalis, ibid. 
1 

1 perform'd pleaded, ibid, 
Rep, Se. as to the remaining Cove- 
nants in a Defeazance, ibid, 
Covenants perform by an Adminiſtrator, & 
Rep!” 74 non, ibid. 
Def Exec confeſs, , and void, ibid. 
As to an Apprentice s abſenting himſelf from 
the Teſtator's Service, 409 


Adminiſtrator pleads a Jud ment, Et Rep! 
nul tiel Record), a : l ta 


Adminiftcatrix confeſſes, but avoids by a Sei 


fe againſt her in B. * ibid. 
Executor pleads Security given, ibid. 
Bar 


W CN 
On. G 


4 N —— N , _ e . ** . . * . 
d : E. * "4 * * - 4 l * * 7 4 , t ; 
= 8 ** : : f 7 A * — "I 1 . 
. : — Fe” ©» -*% 
4 had - 
* j . > *. $ 
” . a" , 
A | . : | 4 s 


| har qe Intefbar” flv, "Page 409 
Ne unques Exec, &c. RepP & Iſue, ibid. 
Ne unques Adm Repl & Iſſue, 410 


Several Bars pleaded there, ibid. & 411, 416 
Bar qd R. Teftator Def adminiſtravit tantum. 
circa Funeralia. Repl' qd' ſolvit deba, Rejo? 
44 non & Exit” ſecundum, Raſt Ent. & al, 
18 FE 410, 411 
Debt ver: Exec? ſur oblꝰ, ſimulcum al Exec qui 
 Urlegat' exiftit”, Bar qd ipſe fuit Exec? qui Ut- 
legt & q4 Def? ut ſeryiens Exec vendidit 
diverſa bona pro illo, & computavit, & travers 


J alio modo, 4242; er 
Plene Adminiſtravit pleaded in B. R. & Rep!” 

4d non, 412 
Aliter, Rep, & Iſue. | ibid. 
Aliter in C. B. Rep! & Iſſue, 15 63, 


© 


References to many other Pleas, & Rep? upon 
Plene Adminiſtravit concerning Utlary, Wa- 
7 ety 5 
Judgment prie de deniers confeſs, Et quoad reſid 
; [ufficies Aſſets, : £62. 343 415 
Quer pet Fudgment de reſidꝰ poſt Sati faction, - 
| 5 | | . 
| Bar, Q Teſt ator fuit indebitat' Domino Regi, rey 
5 | | ibid, 
Plene Adm pleaded to a Bill in Sccio?, 416 
Sur Scire fac, Bar proteſtando qd* plene Adm' pro \ 
placito non devaſtavit, Rep qd' vendidit ad ; 
Valenc, Cc. - | 2 ibid. 
To Debt for the penal Sum upon a Bill, Bar per 
plene Adm”, Iſſue & Verdict pro Quer, 417 
Plene Adminiſtravit placitat, Et Quer pet Fudic 


de bonis, c. que in futuro devenirent admini.. 


rand“, 418 
Bar al Sci fac inde qd plene Adminiſtravit tem. | 
pore . emanation Brevis, Rep!" qd babuer & BE 


419. 


: Me, . | 
Cee 12 Plene | 


* 1 * ods , 8 * 
* | 7 6 nnn IO 1 T 
7 Y 1 8 N * v * 
«, \ 


a ö ; b ” ws. my 22 | 1 f AF * . * a 1 ” l 7 * 
- l * 9 | 
/ * 
dS * 3 _ - * g . | 
* : : 


Plene Adm? preter, &. Et Def prie Fudgment 
de parcell 2 Dett, des biens confeſſe & 2 7 te 
bonts in futuro, Page 420 

Def placitat' Detainer in ſes Mains, viz. Per Adm, 

That the Teſtator was indebted to him by 

Bond, and that he retains the Goods to ſatiſ- 


. 


fy his Debt, 421 
Similis Bar per Exec. RepP qd' fuit Exec de ſon 
fort, Et iſſint ne poiet detein, Occ. 422 
Et vide Seperal al Rept, 423 


To Debt upon Bond, to render Account of 
what Goods and Money ſhould come to his 
Hands, &c. as Adminiſtrator. Bar, That 
no Goods or Money came to his Hands, Oc. 
423 
Repl, That a Silver Bowl came to his Hands, 
Demurr inde, 44224, 425 
With Notes of the Arguments hereupon, 
e 
Exec plede Bar per Statute & Recognixance, 85 
Et Rep! ſur continuance per Fraud, 4.26 
Several other Bars and Replevins thereon, 
427 
Several Judgments pleaded by Executors and 
Adminiſtrators. 4427, 428 
Several other like Judgments pleaded in Bar, 
and Replications, that they were by Fraud, 
Cc. 7 429, 439, Oc. 
That ſome of the Judgments were by Fraud, 
and others were ſatisfied, Cc. 431, oc. 
Bar, by feveral Judgments pleaded. Rep?, not 
above ſo much due, which would be accept- 
ed, e&rc. Defendant demurs, wherein is di- 
rected by the Court the true Way to have 
| leaded in this Caſe, 433 
Adminiſtratrix demurs to a Debt brought C 


the Aſſignees of the Commiſſioners of a 
Bankrupt, - 


Upon 


The TABLE. 

Upon a Bond of the Inteſtate, Bar per Adm 
by a — 9 againſt the Inteſtate, and al- 
ſo againſt the Adminiſtrator himſelf and 
that the Inteſtate was indebted unto him, 
and that he had fully adminiſtred, & non ba- 
buit bona ultra 72 1. which he retain d towards 
his own Debt, and roo J. charged with the 

” faid Judgments, G0. Page 434, Ce. 

Repl as to one Judgment, that it was ſatisfied, 
and kept on Foot by Fraud ; as to another, 
that Satisfaction was acknowledged on Re- 
cord, and that the Defendant had Aſſets 
over the Judgments, and the Debt due to 
him. Defendant demurs, 441, 442, Oc. 

An Exception was taken, that the RepP 
was double, and that the Plaintiff would 
try Matter of Record per Pais, and that 
the Plaintiff had made but one Replica- 
tion inſtead of three, and that there was 
a Diſcontinuance, the Defendant having 
demurr'd only to one Replication; alſo, 
That the laſt Replication was ill for con- 
cluding to the Country, 443, 444, &c. 

An Argument in the like Caſe, That the Plea 
was double, 446 

Judgment againſt an Executrix for want of 
Averment, that one of the Debtors died be- 
fore the Teſtator, 447 

Demurrer, for that the Proteſtando in the Re- 

joinder was repugnant to the Matter in the 
Rejoinder, &c. with the Objections and An. 
ſwers thereunto; alſo, who may only plead 


Non eſt Faftum, 448, 449 
Where Executors, Cc. are not liable to pay 
Colts, 449 


And that if a Plaintiff or Defendant die after 
an Interlocutory Judgment, and before final 
Judgment the Action ſhall not abate, &c. 
= HEN Cee z Secundum, 


1 


"The TABLE 


Secundum, 8 G Will: 3. Alſo when judgment ; 
final ſhalt be for a Plainiff, his Execufors or 
Adminiſtrators, according to che ſaid Statute, 


Page 495 110 


Bo | in Detinue. 


ND.” & Detioue ton , and when, 


451 
* Bar per non Debet nec ter per Parriam 


tid 
© Non Debet nec Detiner per Legem al Debt 


ſur Account devant Auditors. . 452 
© Bar in Petinue tantum, videlt Non detinet 
er Patriam, 2 453 


on detiner' per Leg', & judic TY 453,454 
As to Part, Ion detinet per Legem, al refid 4* Pre- 


ſoription to attach Goods in Civir London, 
 Rep* per nul tiel Record, AIC, 44. &c. 
Al Count de Plate. Bar, That the Plaintiff de- 
keer'd it in Pawn for 10 J. to F. who died 
inteſtate, and Adminiſtration was committed 
to the Defendant, and the Plaintiff had not 
paid the 100. Traverſe, Kepb, & Iſſue ſur — 
456, &c. 
, Super emiſſet in Detention” i Def? 
* plede uncore priſt & pet diem ad delibe- 
rand', eo qd ſunt Feræ Naturz, 457 
© Quer! Repl? qd Def” recuſavic —— 
* Rezo', Q& obtulit & Iſſue inde, 
© Bar in — ner Carallorum ſuper evil 
a Dei dic* qd' Quer' poſt barganiam pre- 
© cepit ei * Vendend” illa, &c. Er'Rep! 
ad non, 458, 459 
Bar in detention Equi, qq* Quet' delibera- 


vit ecuum ſibi ad dep iſturand' ſub ſao pe- 
* riculo, &c. . Rep! & Iſſue, 459 


Bar 


— 


The TABLE. 


x "Me priſel come Waiſe felon' per Baily de 
* Manor”, | Page 459 

8 Rep que le felon ſuit priſe fur Hh Pur 
fait, & ſuit indi” & proſecut per le 
q Plaintiff, & trove M4 per que re- 
e ſticurion' de. ſes biens fuic agard', Et 
$ travers le waiver des biens & Hue fur 


* Ceo, RET 74 &c. 
© Bar per priſel come Eſtray, 463 
Detinue per Exec. Bar, That Adminiſtratio 


was committed to another, and not to the 
- Plaintiff, and that the other ſold the Goods 
to the Defendant. Quer moratur & Der 
12 in morac, 403 Ce. 
ar de Cirtis, videlt ſemper parat ad deliĩ- 
* berand', Et Def recepit in Cur, 464 
7 Jy parat eſt deliberare ſcriptꝰ cui vel quibus, 
ecundm' Condition, andprays Garniſhmene, 

| 46 
* Al Count per J. T. pro feript? Obl ei i fe 
& deliberat' Ber ledeldel and yer cum 
*F inde requiſir', &c. Bar ae”! le Obf fuit de- 
ver al Def? 18 Conditionis & i prie q qd 
© Parties interplede, Ge. kerpleader, Repl 
© Traverſe & fue 8 808 465, 466, &c. 
Count by T.G. an "Heir, 2 aint J. B. and 
m g. of a Box ſealed, ih Writings: De- 
ſendants plead, That one B. J. brought a 
Writ ſor the tame Box, * prays that B. J. 
may count againſt them, Oc. * ee 
9, 479 
To a Count in C. B. Sy Bill againſt Pre: of the 
Juſtices, of a Kasker locked, and Writings 
in them, 470 
* Plea per Pailment a luy per le Plaintiff & 
G. a Bailer, fur Condition & prie-Garniſh. 
© ment vers II. &c. Et Iſſue (ur CeO, 471,472 


Ce 4 In 


: 
f 
| 
j 


The TABL E. 


| In Detinue de Eſcript' perdit, Bar qd le 


. © Plaintiff fuit de ceo poſſeſs, & ceo perde 
© & J. ceo trove, & le Plaintiff releaſe al 
J. & J. ceo done al Def, &c. Page 472, 


473, Ge. 

Bar in Quare Impedit. 474 
| | png in Abatement in Quare Impedit, 
475 

Abatement, for that the Patron is not named 
in the Writ, ibid. 
Simile, for that the Patron was not named, 
| 476 

A Difference is here taken according, 

7 Co. 26. ibid. 


Averment of a Benefice with Cure, ibid 


| Abatement for Variance between the Writ and 


Count, 477 
Demur' inde, & Joinder in Demur', Et 
© Judic' pro Rege, ibid. 


Quare Impedit brought by an Executor, and De- 
ſendant after Oyer pleads in Abatement no ſuch 
Writ in the Regiſter, 477,478 

Other Pleas in Abatement directed to, 478,&c. 

© Bar in Quare Impedit per non impedivit, 
Et Judic' ꝗd' Quer' recuperet preſenta- 
© tionem, | | 479 


The Incumbent pleads nothing but as Parſon 


upon the Preſentment of K. Rep? qd" fuit 
ejus Impeditor, Et Exit inde, 480 
Non Impedivit Judic' & Breve ſuperinde 
© Epiſcopo de admittend' Clericum, &cc. 


* ſet ceſſet Executio quouſq; &c. ibid. 
A Venire Fac' ad triand' Exit & pro damp- 


' $þ 


« Sirgile ad triand' Exit junt', Page 481 
© Cogn Action in Quare Imp', Et Quer* 
« remittit dampna, | 482 
Non Impedivit, and ſeveral other Pleadings di- 
reed to, ibid. & 483, &c. 


As, RepP qd Def non fuit capax Beneficii, 


d Laicus fuit preſentat', upon Two 


Grants the ſame Day, 483 

© Qd' Clericus fuit Schiſmaticus & preſentatio 
© per Lapſum, 484 

* Simile ubi Eccleſie fuit Litigioſa, ibid. 


per Licenc' capere in Commendam, ibid. 
© Per Simony, &c. Et preſentatio done al 
© Univerſity, ibid. & 485. See after. 

* In Quare Impedit, Epiſcopus nichil clamat' 
 * niſi ut Ordinarius, & Bar per Decan & 
© Capitulum qd' Rex H. 8. preſentavit W. 

_ £ advocatio diſcend' Ed. 6. qui commiſit eam 
© Decan', Sc. in feodo & univit & appra- 

© priavit eam eis, 485, &c⸗ 

© Judic' inde vers Epiſcopum, ſet ceſſet Exe- 

© cutio quouſque, &c. Demur* ad placi- 

tum Decan', c. Et Judic' pro Def bs 

2 489, &c. 

Epiſcopus nichil clam' nifi ut Ordinarius, and 
Replication by a ſpecial Impediment 1 by 
© Refuſal, &c. Rejoꝰ de Eccleſia exiſten' liti- 

* gioſa & de jure Patronatus, Surrejo', & De- 
mur', 490, &c. 
Et Judic' pro Def ſur Demurr', 492 
Epiſcopus nichil clam' niſi ut Ordinarius, Et 
* Clericus placitat' ad Exit', &c. 493 


* Bar per Inſufficiency en Literature, 494 


© Repl', Rejo', Surrezo', &c. & Argument 
* pro Quer', that the Bar was too general; 
* alſo if Illiterateneſs be good Cauſe of Re- 


© fuſal, & Judic' pro Def, 4941 495 


* But 


c we 


The TABLE. 
But Ster mardi pro Quer', and affirm'd i 
Frrer, and again reverſed in Parliamem, 
my Page 49% + < 
Le Ordinariĩe demur' fur Count, & le Parſon 10 
© plead en Bar le Statute de Pluralities, 101% p 
L wes, P 
© Joinder in demur ove le Ordinario, R 
Rep! al Parſon, & Iſſue fur le Traverſe, 


5 LeEveſq; claim riens forſque come Ordinari, 


$ 
© Quer' per Judic & breve Epiſcopo & hx WW / 
1 bet, &c. 5031 © 
Statute of Simony pleaded in Bar, &c. fog . A 
© Bar pur Cauſe de Simony pleaded briefly, Et 


© Exit inde, F507. See aftn, M\\ f 

References to many other Pleadings in Q 
_ Impedis, Foz 

Concerning Preſentations by Turns, (09 ME 


Smile, by Uſurpation and Simony, Cc. ibid, 
Upon the Statute of Pluralities pleaded, Biſhops 
tranſlated, Vacation and Collation, and 
Lapſe to the Queen, avoided, 5 ro, & 
Obſervations upon the Statute of Pluralitiu, i 
a 11, & “ 
The Contents of ſeveral Chapters yu 1 
in. the Two Voluines of the Clergy. Aan! 3. 
Law; or, the Compleat Incumbent, 513, Oc: 


Replevin &. Avowry. = c 


T HE Nature of Diſtreſs, Reple vin & Avowry, 
with the ſeveral Branches of Bars and 
Avowries, | | 5. 2M 
How by Stat. 4 & 5 Am. cap. 16. a Plaintil 
in Replevin may plead as many ſeveral Mat- 
ters as he ſhall think neceſſary, &c. 517 


1. Abate 


The TABL E. 


. Abatement, for that the Plaintiff ought 
0 have Action of Betas an * Re- 5 


n 

! plevin, | | Page 317 
| Rep) Traverſe & Illue, 3518 
0 L 
c Liter poſt Oyer, eo qd” Capellanus 
+ Cantarie non eſt nomen Dignitatis, 
3 < Et Judic' pro Deſ', &c. 518 
Abatement a County, & Eſtopple al locum 
UM deliberationis, 519 


„IA former Recovery in Treſpaſs pleaded, ibid. 
But ſuch Recovery no Bar in  Replevin, 


8 +2 

? Eſtopple to a Releaſe after ſeveral Continuances 

* | g 4 

Ps The Eſtopp le diſanowed, and how it ought 

d to have been pleaded, &c. Far 

. 

£ 4 Non cepit Averia, Of. in Replevin, 322 

d 

/ 3 Dy oad Locum G. Diew, 

Et Traverſe de lieu, ibid, 805 
. Quod diem, 525 

„ Bar al ke per Hors de fon Fee contra 

. ; 7 © Ballivum, & . ibid. 

il | 

t 

7 * 


4 Def 


! 
| 
| 
li | 


_ © Bar al Avowry per diſclaimer, Et qd” obtulit 


The TABLE. 


Al 

c 

4. Def cogn ut Balliuus pur Damay ' Al 

feſam, Page 5761. N 

5 A Liter ut Ballivi G. B. & L. T. Spinſter, i * 

A pur Damage feſant, 527 Der. 

a 

5. Def advocat in jure ſuo proprio, 528 N 

© TDAR al Avowry & Traverſe ſolum & f. 
0 berum tentum* Def*, Et Iſſue fur Ti. 
K verſe, F29 


0 Def advocat in jure Oxoris, 530 


Efendant avow'd pro dampno facto, ubi ſeit 

fuit in feodo, and Plaintiff prays that the 
Defendant may wage Deliverance, 774 wb 
Tender of Amends pleaded in Bar, ibid. 


© Def' ſufficien Emendas pro Dampno, 

| $31 

© Demurrer inde, Et joinder in Demur', Ar. 
gument inde, Et Judgment pro Avowant, 

| | * 
Bar al Avowry per Diſclaimer, Et Inquir' de 
© Dampnis agard, ibid, 


7. Defendant pleads Property in Reple- WB: 
vin, 7 | 533 


: Bax qd” Proprittas ſuit in altero, ibid. 
© Er Avowry pro retorn', pro dampn' facien, 
Et Iſſue fur Property, 534 


5 Aliter 


The TABLE 


c Aliter qd le Pr operty eſt al Auter, Et Tue 


© ſur ceo, Page 535 
© Aliter ubi ſunt duo Quer?, Et Replevin pro 
duobus Equis, ibid. 


6. Non cepit quoad partem, quoad reſid' pro- 
pfrietas Equi fuit al A. P. & proprietas patelle 

„ * fuic al T. P. & non Quer', =! 
7) MDetinue was of a Cow, and a Stack of Hay, 
and a Pike of Hay : Defendants make Cog- 

2M nizance as the Sheriffs Bailiffs. Bar as to the 
Cow per Property. + 

ls Repl, That N. S. was poſſeſſed. EW 1 
+l pro Quer al part, Et pro Def quoad vac- 
cam, Dampn' per Diſcretion” Fuſtic, 538 
Several Notes and Obſervations as to Coſts pro 


Luer, and Coſts pro Def, 538, 539, Cc. 
Other Reference as to Property pleaded, ö 540 


. Bar per Licenc placitat al Avowry, G. 
| Traverſe ſolum & liberum Tentum, 544 


10, AR per Licence for a Way. Rep! per Co- 
31 1 Surrender, and extinct, & Demur 
u. in 5 | | 54 
nt, Obj. x. That the Way was not of Neal. 
32 ſity, &c. 546 
de 2. If the Copybold was extinct by the Pur- 
bid chaſe, 547 
| 3. That the Feoffment pleaded was with- 
out Conſideration, &c. ibid. 
le- Bar by Licence from Cuſtomary Tenants to 
33 put in his Cattle, ibid. 
Rept & Travers le Cuſtom, 548 
107 1. That ſuch Licence ought to be by 
en Deed, 548 
1 | 2. How ſuch Preſcription ought to be, 26:4. 
3. How aided aſter Verdict, ibid, 
: Bar 
ner 5 


a A P30 6 * 9 N * . Pu * ern r I * v ** q * an 8 ** 
, . 16 99 , as.” 1 EY * — a - Sv 1 þ Ea hb. - * - 
0 2 8 * . | oe 
&O * - 4 8 7 +: 1, Yet * Fl ( 4 * * * 5 * * 9 "rg 4. N 4 _ 8 * 
* - ? ab Je" " 4 - « r 7 , 1 
| 25 . - he | / 
. * 45 % : 
, . 
. * - EP —_ 1 
”- 8 . ” 
| b > ” | | 
4 . : o 
"4 1 — * 3 Y N o 
r 1 * you * * — 2 
8 f y f l , 
: 
* 
* F 


: Bar per Licenc' ponere bona if Meſſusg pit 


* conſervation' eorundem, Page 

Simile de Averiis, all © 

9. Bor pur Damage feſum, p. $49. Et ville 

ante. Juso 

5 2 Yds is = |: 

to. Bar ſur Title in Replevin G. Avon ll 
= 3) Bp 


7 Avowry per Title pur 34 Cattle. Gates; Bar and 
_ IT. Demurrer as to Part, with ſeveral. Cauſes of 
Ki Demurrer; and as to the Reſidue, that he 
= the Plaintiff is Lord of the Manor, Oc. Ney 
per Maintenance de Cattle. Gates, and traverls 
the Sufficiency of Paſture. Demurrer ind 
by the Plaintiff, © -©- - $549, 550,01 
Obj. If Cattle-Gat $be Fes, Ff 
What Lands are accounted Parcel of * 
nor, 5 ng 
The Avowry adjudged ill for not ſhewi 
good Title to the Cattle- Gates, pi 
Where in Replevin ſpecial Damage ought to 
alledged by a Commoner, , 
Cognizance as Bailiff of a Corporation, ji 
Cognizance as Bailiff of Infants being Cop 
holders, and their Guardian, mh 
* Bar by Title from another Guardian. R 
by Cuſtom for the Defendant to afligt 
Guardians at his Court, & Demur' ind 
s . $5245h 
Several Objections and Points refoly'd, l 


Fudie pro Def, 1 


= 
* 2 


5 © 


4 


a 


ff Cornizance by. Bailiffs taking Sheep for Da- 
, Cos felant. | Bar, That the Plaintiff boughe 
the Sheep in a Fair within the Dutchy of 

\ Lancaſter, Et demurr inde, Page 554 
now the Statute concerning the Seal of Lan. 
. caſter extends, i ibid. 
How upon a Preſentation or Avoidance, 5 7 
How upon the Grant of a Reverſion, bid: 


N | 
u. Bar, Gr. af Avorwry pur Net- Charge, 
id, | 


555 
POR a Rent-Charge granted by the King 2's 
Tenant, | * ibid. 
Bar, That the Leaſe was avoided by Par 


{ll liament, 556 
1 Avowry for a Rent Charge granted to his Wife 
bY, dum ſola, | ibid. 
{il L. If che Rent did ceaſe by her Intermar- 
{i  flage. zi 


pon a Grant of a Rent-Charge in Fee, 557 


in Upon a Rent-Charge granted to a Mayor and 
bi . 5 EF ibid. 
r 94" non conceſſit, ibid. 


bil Cognizance as Bailiff, upon a Rent - Charge to 
a Man and his Wife, with a Proviſe, and 
wall Penalty with Clauſe of Diſtreſs, ibid. 
iu Demur' inde, and a Quære if the 41. was a new 


Rent diſtinct, or a Nomine pene annexed, 558 
Tot 2. L. If the Arrearages belonged to the 
ind! Adminiſtrator of the Survivor, ibid. 
Cognizance as the Bailiff of an Executor, for 
„Kent arrear to the Teſtator, 559 
benur inde, and argued, That this Cal: is 

within the Statute pro Exec. ibid, 


z. That if the Lands be not charged, the 
Plaintiff ought to ſhew it, 4 60 
* 


4 


W 
be FABLE 
ec, for a Fourth Part upon 4 Ren. 
Charge granted out of Land, being of the 
Tenure of Gavelkind, Page 560 
' Demurrer, and O. if this Cognizance be good, 
though Judgment was for the Conuſant, 561 


How a Jointenant ſhould avow, ibid 
Concerning the Remainder of a Rent de no, 
vr 1 90 


12. Bar pur Rent ſur Demiſe, Ge. 56 


Avowry under the Aſſigment of a Leaſe made 
by a Mayor, Bailiff, and Commonaly, 
Bar per non dimiſit, Rep Exit, and Verdic 
pro Quer-, Error, Exceptions, no Repleader 
allowed, Et Judic affirmat?, 562, Oc, 
Avowry for Damage feſant. Bar by a Demiſe. 
Keyl, That it was upon Render of Rent, and 
an Entry for Non. payment. Rejo', That he 
was ready to pay; and traverſes Demand 
of the Rent, and Iſſue upon the 'Traverle 
| | F64 
Special Obſervations upon the Pleading; 

1. As to the Demand of the Rent, . 

F6F, 56 

2. As to Demand before Sun-ſet, © 56 

3. As to a Traverſe, Abſq; hoc, &. ibik 
4. As to the Iſſue nat being W 
the Verdictgc, blk, 
Cognizance as Bailiffs, after ſeveral Deſcents h 
Fine, c. for Rent arrear upon a Leaſe, 56) 
Bar by a Feoffment before the Leaſe, ant 
Traverſe of Seiſin, tempore Finis, 1b 

Obj. That the Iſſue was immaterial: R 
pleader awarded, 567,508 
Reaſons for a Repleader, and Judgmelj 
ver Quer for Default of Kan | 

1255 109 

3 Avouſg 


n 


3 "S 4 . = a = "=" 
4 n_ * 0 P” K 9 1 * a 
: a 1 2 e 5 bad 
* 2 5 * E R * 2 * * * * * * * 0 * * mY 174 * 
. _ bo 2 a 5 7 L 4 * 
* a 7 n 1 a F * N - * * 
* * by 
. * 


. 2 * 9 * * N 9 & "IR y * 
* * | | wa; i. 
" Y U 
_ * 0 wa 7 
£* N 7 a 
1 »..4 2 * ua 


% 


* 


* 


Avowry for Rent Arrear upon a Leaſe, De- 43 
murter for want of Traverſe of the Place, E 
8 ET 7. 70G; Lo 2 IS = 
Exception for Variance between the Wric A 
_ © and Count, with the Diſtin&tion of a 2 
1 Difference inter Detinet & Detinuit, 4 
| | 1 1 ta 5 569 I 
2M F. an Inn-keeper, lets a Leaſe of the Place 
where, Cc. to V. and a Drover coming 
wich Cattle to London, with Conſent of the 
' Leſſor and Leſſee put in his Cattle to feed 
te for one Night, and FJ. diſtrained them for 
y Rent Arrear. Rey“, Rejo', Demurr” , and 
14 aſter ſeveral Objections Judgment for the 
or _Avowant, J068, 570, Cc. 
„ la Avowry for Rent, a Copyhold was leaſed 
ſe far 99 Years, Reverſion to B. N. and L. and 
nds they three living, the Leaſe of the Manor 
he was aſſigned to B. 71 
off 1. 2. If che Term is not executed in Fee- 
ſe Simple, and fo the Inheritance deſtroy- 
by „ 572 
0 2. When it appears the Avowry is for 
>; more Rent, or that the Avowant had no 
. Tice to Part, | ibid, 
3. Judic pro Quer for the ill Pleading in 
the Avowry, | ibid. 
Avowry for Rent Arrear under à Conveyance a 


by }- F. Bar by an elder Title, Diſcent 
and Seiſin, until diſſeized by J. F. who 
made the Conveyance. Rep, by a Feoff- 
ment to J. F. and long Continuance of Poſ- 
ſeſſion and Seiſin, o“ 572, 573 


Da d 13. Bar 


8 N * " + 1 4 
* « —_— , - wy +." Mt. „ 2 * * * * 3 1 = 
* N * 9 n - «in. hab * gd. "T0 y hy & 2 . C4 > - * \ & * 25 * o * 4 * * 
== * ae 4d * TT PR wt * * n „ * * I 4 * * * e er 2 V * N 3 4 * 4 
9 "#3; T +" — * R CT lates. a6 4 \ 2 3 4 * " N 25 ** 2 
4 OW + % « =P 2 7 v4 a dg * - Y _ * , - 8 * 15 ** Po, A. 4 8 * 4. 8 k 
== ® 6 x; "Ns * = . J | Ae. "> * x p A y . ? * HF 
r . 0 | 
- P X * e 
4% a, J 1 * * 0 . U ; 
* Re l * *% ws." * 
3 N ; # S. \ 
_—_— ; , p 
L ld % + FR - - * 1 \ ; 9 * * * * 
FL. - p * E : * : > 
2x8 
"IF 
<2 
4 
5 
o 


, 13. Bar pur Rent on Services, Sc. p. 573 


_ Afendant as Bailiff makes Cognizance, 
1 Part for Rent Arrear, and Part for a 
Relief. Bar, as to the Rent, by Tender 
and Refuſal; and as to the Relief, Plaintiff 
demurs ſpecially, becauſe the Title to that 
did not appear, yet Judgment for the Co. 
nuſant, | | $73» Oc. 
| Cogn for Fealty, Rent Arrear, and Suit of 
Court; and Plaintiff conſeſſing the Rent, 
travexſes the Tenure by Fealty, Rent, and 


Suit of Court, 574 
Upon a ſpecial Verdict found, a Quære was, 
If the Manor was deſtroyed, ibid, 


That a Jury is not to diſpute Things agreed 
on by the Parties, Er TFudic pro Def, 
7 
Obſervations there concerning a'Court By 
ron being incident to a Manor, ibid. 
Cogn for Service undone, viz. Homage. De- 
murrer for want of making Title to che Ho- 
mage, &c. ag e e LE 576 
| Cogn” made by Bailiff for Rent Arrear from 
Cs F.. Tenant by Fealty. Plaintiff prays in 
Aid of J. C. who traverſes the Tenure, E 
= Def Demurr cum Cauſit, 76, Oc, 
4 Obſervations concerning Diſtreſſes for Rent, 
\ "from Statute Law, | | 


* 


" 57 

As when a. Plaintiff is nonſuited before 
Iſſue, Arrears are to be inquired of by 
17 Car. 2. ca. 7. and a Recovery, with 


as. 1. ao fer) 


Coſts, | ibid. & 578 
If Avowant be nonſuited aſter Avowry and 
Iſſue, 578 
It Judgment be for him upon Denny 
Vd. 
If 


7 -. 
7 Y % 4 2 1 15 
— 


11427 


. 


* © +> © one \ n * * 6 [Yap * 9 . 
» = 10 AW * = © * N 
1 I * " ld OS. CENT g 
„ F R : 
ns *. VO * 
N 5 1 4 
1. * » X 
*. 2 . 3 B 
% 1 8 2 * 2 * 


If che Diſtreſs amounts not to the Value, 


6 e eee 
How, and to what Counties the aforeſaid 


Act ſhall extend, by 19 Car. 2. ca. 5. 


# ; . old, 
. Concerning Diſtreſs ſor Rent, by 2 V. & 14. 


n 125 7 8 
Concerning Rent to be paid before Goods 
ſhall be taken in Execution, as by 8 Anm. 

to prevent Frauds to be committed by 


+ * * Tenants, 580, Cc. 


Concerning Remedy againſt Tenants for 
Life, and ſuch Tenants as hold over 
their Leaſes, 582, Cc. 


14. Avonry pur Amercement, Ge. p. 3 83 


A2 ſor not paying a Rate for Relief oſ 
the Poor, | ibid. 
1. Demurrer inde, and Q. If the Avowants 
had not waved the Statute 43 12 5 =. 

| 4, 595 

2. Another Exception as to a Variance 
between the Writ and Count, Er Judic 


. pro Def, Ce. 585 


Avowry upon a Diſtreſs for an Amercement, 


for not repairing a Bridge according to the 
Cuſtom of a Manor, Bar de injuria ſua pro- 
pria ; Demurr inde, and Conuſance held ill 


upon the By-Law alledged, 585, 586 
Traverſe de Reſidency infra Letam, 587 
Sur Amerciament in Court Baron, ibid. 
Simile, & Traverſe de Reſidency, ibid. 
Sar Amerciament pro ſecta ad Molendin in 1 

ibid. 
Dad d 2 15. Avopry 


* ou 6 4 nrg g _— 
ud ah. * N 5 
„ . i ot 
N * 1 . * d 4, N 
| # * F * VI ** CIOS * 
* ” 4 3 * 
F . r os. 1 
* 
* 5 8 K 


. 2 


N . * 
* 
8 N em 
X 2 


: N n Pk 2c * 
5 7 5 "OHNE 2 + os. n £ 
24 * 1 * ** 
1% 3 4 4 4 * q 
7 7 KY 0 A 
« \ n 7 
- „ 7 
= - 


* 4 * * _ ai 4 2 we * _— A. * * N * * 4 Are 

= A 4 A * * * , \ hy AI” * N . TY "5 Ws as. 4 * ) s N hk.” ' 

22 a r e. 5 l 7 8 s . * al 2 k Z 
>. ** * . * 7 7 mw l * > + \ « l 4 * * * N 
hi 2 1 y - : 
_ * ; * : N. . 1 „ 1 N bi 

190 * ö 4 
=. G 

WH & ; ; | | 

b x, 
* gr , 
4 


15. Avowry r Fine, 6 Ber inde. p. 587 


R not paying a Fine upon Admiſſion of 1 

4 Cuſtomary Tenant, ibid. | 
Demurr cum 5 the ſole Queſtion was 
upon the Cuſtom, Et Judic pro 9 

* . 

Avowry for not paying two Fines upon two 
ſeveral Alienations, Secundum Con Manerii, 
Et Demurr inde, * 588 
Upon two Fines in a Court Baron, for not gi- 
ving in Verdidts cum Sociis, Bar, & Demury, 
| „% 1%, wa 
For refuſing to be ſworn Conſtable, ibid, 
Simile, & Bar per non Reſidency, &. ibid. 


16. Avowry pur Pain, & Bar inde. p. 589 


Pon a Preſentment for ſtopping a Way, 
And fo for not repairing Hedges, ſtop- 
ping of a Common Pond, &c. 590 
Upon a Diſtiller for not making due Entries in 


the Exciſe.Office 3 Bar by a Title by a Will 


Et Demurr inde, ibid, 
I. Excep. That he ought to have avowed, 
and not juſtified, _ ibid. 

2. As to pleading a Record prout patet, 
| 591 

3. As to a Warrant Non prolat', ibid, 


The TAB LE : 1 


N ny far Preſerpion ou Cuſtom de — I 
Common. N Page 591 | 


C pro Domps , fact in Libs Tents, Bar per | 
Preſcription' fro Common, Repl, and traver- 
ſes the * Rejo & Iſſue, and then the" 
Plaintiff pleads a Releaſs aſter the laſt Con- 
tinuance, 591, 592 
Demurr inde, and Directions how ſuch Ke. 
leaſe ought to have been pleaded; and a 
Quaere, if it ought not here to have been 
* Pleaded in Bar, 592 
A proper Form for ſuch Pleading, 593 
Avowry upon a Surcharge of Common, on 
| z 
Avowry ; Bar, That the Plaintiff's Leſſor 
alſo had Common; Rept by a Sur- 
charge, Rejoinder and Iſſue upon the 1 
Surcharge, ibid. b 
Verdict for the Defendant 5 Quare, If one 
Commoner may diſtrain the Cattle of 
another Commoner, and Judgment to 
be arreſted Nyſi, ibid. 
Cogn pro Dampn fat in Libero Tento', Bar per 
Preſcription & Cuſtom pro ſola & ſeperal Pa. 
ftur, Et Demurr inde, 594 
Excep. 1. That a Preſcription and Cuſtom 
is mixed, ibid. 
2. P. If the Lord may be excluded? Ref: 
* That the Lord is to intercommon, = 
997 
3. If a Lord by Grant may exclude him- 
ſelf, c. 596 
Tryal at Bar, and Verdict for the Lord, 
#01 


Ddd 3 Cogn? 


_ 45 — bu 
g #- as ©: ky * WT IF * 4 
Y \ * - 8 7 x 5 
[7 * 1 * * * * * 
- ** „ 


8 The T A BL E 6 * 
og ſur Preſeriptiom pur Toll, Et Bar per Tenan. 
. Demeſne, Demur re, & oder pro 


er, Wa . 8e $97 
Traverſe de Preſcription, - thid. 
Awvowry per, Liberty of Foldage, Bar & traverſe 

Preſcription”, IG | 2 | 
Prdinance del Cur traverſe per Bar, 14 


18. Avowry &. Bar de Incloſures. ibid. | | 


Vowry for Rent Arrear; and Bar in De- 
fect of repairing the Hedges, ibid, & 

| 1' I 
Def Demurr, & Judic pro Def; Error 
brought, and the judgment affirm d 
with the Reaſon thereof, tho' it ſeems 2 
hard Caſe, 600, Cc. 


* 8 


19. Gage Deliverauce. 601 
20. Judic in Replevin. ibid. 


Nu Obſervations upon ſeveral of the afore. 
O mentioned Avowries, &c, 602, Ge. 
References for a brief Learning of this great 

Branch of Replevin and Avowries, 604 


' TRESPASS. ox 


N Introduction thereto from a late Trea. 

1 tife of Treſpaſles, ibid. 
The Contents of the aforeſaid Treatiſe, 606, 
mr 5 n Cc. 
How the Bars and Pleadings in Treſpaſs are 
divided in Mr. Townſend's Tables, 609 
Few in thoſe Tables of Mr. Cornwall, 610 
þ dd, ef wWw-% #7 * e - v Precaution 


4 * * * * as "_—* * e xs A 
\ * 9 1 5 * . * RY 
* 
s - 4 * * 


. "The T AZ BLE 
Precaution upon the Statute 8 & 9 W. z. ea. tl. 
Page. 612 
I. Bar i in Treſpaſs, from the Entries of Serjeant 
Lutwycbe, Oc. ibid. 
By Abatement for Privilege, for that he was a 
Servant to one of the Clerks in Chancery, 


and three Exceptions taken, with Anſwers 
thereto, Et Judi“ pro Quer for Default of 


= an Averment, ibid. & 613 
ö Abatement by Outlawry aſter Judgment, and 

Plaintiff demurs, 613 
| ' Exception, as to ipſe for off „ and debet for 
| debent, ibid. 
| Alſo, it is noted there, concerning a fall 
| Defence made, ibid. 
| 


The Action was for taking away his Cattle, 
and lopping his Trees, Joftification 2 A- 
batement for want of Addition, 614 

Excep. 1. As to 1 Poſſeſſonat fuit 


ibid. 


2. As to the Plea beivg double, Er Julie 


pro Quer, ibid. 
Bar, of Forleiture by Tenant by the Curteſy, 
615 


Bar, by Statute of Limitations pleaded. Rep!”, 
| by an Original and Outlawry, Et Demurrer 
inde cum Cauſis, ibid. 
Obj. That the Original being laid in L. he 
—_ not declare in another County, 


Sed Fudic* pro Quer, ibid. 
Defendant pleads Non Cul as to Part; and as 


to the Reſidue. he pleads a Judgment for 
the Deſendant againſt the Plaintiff in ano- 
ther Action for the fame Treſpaſs, with 
Averment of the Identity, and he Plaintiff 


demurs thereto, 616 
And it ſeems Fade rf Def", 3 
Obſery 


* 2 TY * * * 7 - * 2 ” * ang 
* mn * * 2 " e's ** N * 7 9 7 N 5 4 * 7 
0 wy — {ad * * , 
©” . ” 
” * k " 1 | 
» y ' 
The | 1 A B LE $ 
\ — b 4 ' | 
1% > | 


Obſerv, 1. Wherefore the Plaintiff demurrid 


in the firſt Action, Page 616, 617 

2. As to an Exception taken in the firſt 
Action, as to a new Aſſignment, 617 

3. As to an Omiſſion in Plaintiff's por 


in the firſt Action, © 3.06.8 
2. Common, Cc. plgadedin Bar, 618. See after, 
3. Tender of Ames pleaded, ibid, 
4. Licence pleaded in Tleſpaſs, ibid, 
5. Bar per ſon Aſſault Demeſu, & molliter manu: 
impoſuit, &. > 61 


Bar by a Church: warden for taking off a Man's 
Hat in the Church, r thi, 
Bar by a Sheriff, Son Aſſault Demeſne as to the 
Battery, and juſtifies as to the rain . 
Plaintiff demurs, becauſe nothing ſaid to 
the Vi & Armis, 620 B. 
Defendant juſtifies keeping Poſſeſſion of his ; 
Cloſe in C. and travetſes he is guilty at H. 
Cc. Plaintiff replies, he had a Way thro' 
the Cloſe, and the Defendant aſſaulted bim; 
and traverſes, That mollizer manus impoſuit, 
Et Demurr inde cum C auſis, | ibid. 
FJudic pro Quer, and that he may in his 
Repl wp. the Tort in another Vill or 
County, Cc. be, Man 
Deſendants juſtify as Servants to the Mayor of 
B. upon a Battery of Plaintiff's Servants and 
Horſes ; and Plaintiff demurs, 621 
Excep. 1. That the Detendants ought to 
ſhew Authority under Seal, ibid. 
2. It is only ſaid, Od voluiſſent & conaban- 

tur, and not that they were upon the 
Land, | ibid. 

3. That per quod ſervitium amiſit is not an- 
ſwered, but Judgment pro Quer, the pro- 
per Plea being Nen Cu/7, 22 


, , 2 
* nnn 4 . „ a 
* og 9 , Y 9 P L 5 4 0 
WW 2, 4 * - 
\ 4 
* P P 
— * 4 


Tube TABLE. 

4. Noted, That an Action lies for a Ma- 
ſter, altho he did not loſe the Service of 

his Servant, — Page 662 

Bar per Son Aſſault Demeſa. Rei”, "That the 
Defendant endeavoured to beat his Maſter's 
Horſe, and judgment pro Def for noe al- 
ſledging in Fact that he beat the Horſe bęe- 
H SARS, 
Noted here, That tho? a Servant may juſti- 
fy in Defence of his Maſter, yet he may 

not juſtify in Defence of his Goods, &. 
only d molliter manus impoſuit, & c. 623 

6. Bar de Impriſonment per Proceſs, 24 
Defendant juſtiſies by a Writ, Warrant and 
Arreſt, at D. RepP de injuria abſque tali 
Cauſa, but held ill on Demurrer, for put- 
ting Variety of Matter on one Iſſue, ibid. 
Bar by a Judgment,” and Ca ſa thereon. Ren, 
That che Judgment was vacated by the Court. 
Rejo', That the Judgment was. entred by 
Neglect of the Clerk, 624, 625 
Iran & Impriſonment quouſque Finem fecit. 
Bar, and juſtifies by an Execution from an 
inferior Court, Sed Fudic' pro Quer ſur male 
Dleading, ; 625 
_ Simile, in Tran & Impriſonmem quouſque, Cc. 
1. Bar, by Warrant upon a Writ of Privilege. 
2. By a Cap Url, Er Quer moratur, 626 
Exceptions to both Bars, and Authorities 
: cited, ibid. 
Count for Aſſault, Battery, Wounding and 
= impriſonment, againſt four. Bar by him 
that was the Plaintiff in the Inferior Court, 
per un Ca' ſa, Cc. Rep, no Scire Facias 
ſued out, and Deſendant demurs, 627 
Excep. 1. That molliter manus impoſuer was 


no Juſtification of the Battery, and Notes 
thereon, ibid, 


2, It 


. N 
ö * 
. oF IP 5 
: | 


=... * Te deem d onde PEARS was: no 
4 Ve Plea to the Batte 2 but Judgment "= 
= A againſt the Plainti becauſe of 4 D. Wl | 
be * continuance, * 628 
Salt, "againſt four, and Juſtification ye E 
Bar, by Bailiff of dhe Sheriff of a County 2 
Latim, where the Defendants pleaded, Na 
Cut to an Aſſault, and yet juſtily, ibid. 
lf ſuch Plea is not repugnant in 1 By 
| 
Juſtification by Officers of an Inferior Court, M = 
Rep”, That the Action accrued out of the WW - 
Juriſdiction, and traverſes that it accrued I g. 
within, which Traverſe was impertinent, 2. 
not being of that which was rar in P. 
the Plea, ibid. & 630 -- 
Juſtification, where the Party eſcaped out of 
tho uriſdiction, and was retaken by freſh 
1 | urlpit, _ 6230 
% , Juſtification of an Aſſault, for that the Plaindf Ju 
[ being Priſoner, in his carrying to Gaol re, 
ſiſted, with ſeveral Traverſes;, 631 
Bar to an Aſſault, That one of the Defendants 
had formerly paid the Execution Money to 
the Plaintiff's Attorney, Rep! per Nul tid D 
Record, c. ibid, 
Per Cur, That Variance was between the if 
Records of the Actions, and want ol 
Averment of Identities, ibid. 
Aſſault, & c. in partibus tren[marinis, Bar per Sta. 
tut 45 Limitations, Rep C Demurr, 632 
Per Cur, the Count is repugnant, the Tre. 
paſs being ſuppoſed at Fort St. George u ! 
partibus tranſmarinis, vix. apud London, 
&c. and that the Plaintiff might har: 
ſued out an Original, Cc. ibid. Fa 


- ALS 25 


7 " * 
W * 7 4 N " 1 FX * 3 —_— 4, a 8 7 * 
dah R ! * L FR) * e 1 7 
( i { 65 2 n * 
4 d Z 


The TABLE. 

Bar by an Attachment out of Chancery, Rep”, | 
That theWrit was not delivered to the Sheriff - 
before the Battery, G c. Rejo', Surrejo', Re. 

butter, Demurrer, Et Fudic pro Def”, Page 63 3 
It ſeems a Writ, tho' not delivered, war- 
rants the whole; and that the Bailiff not 

being Privy, or having Notice, ſhall 
not be charged, ibid. & 634 
7. Bar pur Miſdemeanors, Ce. As Juſtification 


l by a Conſtable, by a Sheriff, by a Bailiff of 

' BY a Manor, by a Mayor's Servant, by Juſtices 

5 Warrant, by a Captain's Command, for 
ill. Diſſeiſin, by Chaſtiſement. &c. 634, 635 

. Bar de Inſalt! & Menaces, &c. 635 

1 9. Bar per Officers ou Proceſs, ibid. 


Per N fa, & Levari fa, the Doors being open. | 3 

*RepF, That the Doors were lock d. Rejo', 1 
That they were open, Et iſſue inde, 635 | 

Verdict pro Quer, but Judgment ſtay d for 

. an Incertainty, ibid. & 636 

Juſtification by Fi fa out of an Inferior Court, 

Cc. RepP de injur ſua propr, and traverſeth 
to the Record twice, Rejo* qd babetur tale 

Record, and Judgment pro Quer for ill Plead- 

x ing, altho' the RepP was held ill, Cc. 636 

ö Defendants juſtify in Aid of Bailiffs, for that 

ii — * 2x8 hy "—_ the Goods 
taken by ' fa, Cc. Rep infur propr”, 
and Heer his Aid of the Bailiff, Ge. De: 
murr inde, HIT 63 
Per Cur, the Traverſe in the Rep ill, Plea 
| of Defendants ill, Place not material, Et 

'i Fudic pro Quer, ibid. 

"WJ Defendants juſtify by F f from the County 
Court, but Judgment againſt them for ill 
Pleading, Soo 

Simile, by Levari fac out of the Hundred 
Court, 638 
N Et 


_ N 8 l . : P a » 5 ** 
» ** bY ve * ä * * 8 * 4 3 VP P „„ a ” As — * * 4 = 
T F : g * a 
OY bs 4 * * * > þ „ — * * 
F 4 f - 4 : 
* F a * 
. * * & 


The TABLE. 
Et Smile out of a Baron, Er Fudic . 
— 1 
Defendant juſtifies by three Warrants out of the 
County Court, but Judgment pro Quer for! 
ill Pleading after ſeveral Exceptions and 
J oy Anſwers, as to Taliter proceſſam fuit, as to al. 
Ig ledging a Place within the Juriſdi&ion, a; 
A to the Direction of the Warrant, as to ſel 
ling Goods upon a Levers," &. 638, 639 i 
Defendants juſtify taking the Cattle by three 
\ Levaries out of the Hundred Court, and 
Detainer quouſqque, he paid the Damages and 
Charges, and ſeems on the Defendant's MW « 
Parc, © © „mec 
Defendants juſtify by Attachment at another 
Day with Traverſe, that they are puilty 
aliter; and Judgment for the Plaintiff, be. 
cauſe of the Traverſe being ſpecially demurt d 
to, I fs SBS 
Several Points reſolved, 1. As to the Pleà 
being good without any Traverſe, ibid, 
2. Whether the Traverſe as Surpluſage had 
| not made the Plea ill, 641 8 
| 3. If fuch an Attachment as to Number ol | 
Goods be juſtifiable, ibid. 
4 That the Traverſe did not extend to 
Defendants jululj by a W —— 
| ants juſtify by a Warrant upon a Ca A 
| — 7 and upon Demurrer, 1 
for the Plaintiff, becauſe not ſhewn from I 
Defendants juſtify by Proceſs e Cur, created by 
Letters Patents, Demurr inde, Et Fudic pm Wh » 
Over, | 642 i 
Juſtification by a E fa, Demurr inde, and i 
Judgment againſt the Defendants for want 
of making Defence, Per ven & defend vin 
& injur” quando, Cc. =_ | 
at 


* . ws * 
E * 1 
* 


Bar by E fe, till Plaintiff paid the Money to 
the Uſe of the Sheriff. Demurrer, and 
Judgment againſt the Defendants for ill 
Pleading, Page 642, 643 

er upon à Habere fac poſſ, 643 

War by Eutry upon an Habere fac poſs, and 

thereupon put the Goods in the High- way, 

and the Plaintiff refuſed to come forth, &c. 

2 . TOS.” 

RepP de injur ſua propr”, held ill for want of 

a Traverſe, -  ' 644 
Non. Cul; &. Fuſtification of the Entry ill, 
Sed Fudic pro Def”, | ibid. 

O5{c 1. That the Declaration was ill for not 
expreſſing the Quantity or Quality of the 

-. Goods, | | h ibid. 

2. Bar ill, for not faying he delivered the 

Poſſeſſion to W. el ibid. 
cpi Averia per Warrant”- de Repleg*, &c. 
Rep!” per Property pleaded, 

Bar per Warr' de repleg executed, Demurr? 2 
TR” | ibid. 

Excep. x. As to the Poſſeſſion, ibid. 

2. As to the Place of Complaint, ibid. 

3. Per Cur, the Declaration ill for not 

ſhewing what Cattle, ibid. 

4. That the Defendant's Plea was ill, and the 

Exception thereto was fatal, bid. & 646 

Defendants juſtify by a Writ, De homine replegi- 

do, viz, . I. Judgment pro Quer? for 

want of Averment, that V. L. was in the 

& Plaintiff's Houſe, 646 

defendant juſtifies by Warrant upon a Bill of 

$ Middleſex, Demurrer, for that it did not 
© appear the Writ was delivered to the Sheriff 
beſore the Treſpaſs, 647. Vide ante, 

. Bar de Nocumentis, | 647 

Defendant 


= „%% r 4 


nns r d 


. 


nt 
im 
d. 
dar 4 


2 4 TY — 
* * St * * 
AS « 
% x PLES 
* + 
- : 


p4 . — X p © 9 * *. * ö FOE 18 "y 
EY 8 N * * * * dh 5 * 
9 a] 4 x Y ; N * 3 * > N W 1 5 QF "= 
9 * 7 Wi * * . * 
N — N . „ * - , * 1 by * * * 
* . a * 
* 2 
* 4 * : 
. , | K 
1 „ ew >, — 1 1 2 
: * 
N * ; 
* * ” 


| Defendant juſtifies breaking down a Chimney, 


Rept” & Traverſe, Jo Page 6% 
Simile, of Sea Banks, © © % 
11. Bar de Rent ou Services, 1 


Defendants juſtify for an Heriot, . #4 
Simile, with a Proviſo to ceaſe after one Lis 
ended; Plaintiff demurr'd Cum Caufis, and 
the Court was divided upon the Argumen, WW - 
| 15 ibi 
Action againſt Baron and Feme for Treſpai, 
of the Wife. Bar, That the Wife diſtrained 
for Rent. Rep!, That ſhe. uſed and fold 
the Goods. Rejo', by Statute 2 NM & AM 
Demurr inde cum Cauſis, and Judgment pu 


 Quer,, becauſe of bad Pleading, 649 2 
Bar for Rent Arrear for Part of a Recor), 20 
. '6 0 


Oh. That one may not avow two Diſtreſ 
for one and the ſame Rent: But Que 
if ſo be there was not ſufficient tor 

iſtreſs at firſt, | bh 

Bar, by Diſtreſs for Rent. Rep?, That the Cu 
tle were not Levant and Couchant. Iſh 
Verdict, and Judgment 7 Quer, ibid. & 6h - 


Directions to much Learning concerning 
Levant and Couchant, 61 

12, Bar de Amercements, &c. = 

43. Bar de Frank-Tenement, 1257. 

That after Liberum Tenementum pleadaſſ A 

the County Court hath no Power top 

ceed, 6 


* < ä 1 — x. f 
* * 4 c, 6 2 1 * -F Ws , 
2 A Y >, 9 
- * * * * wh * E wv 
C 
* 


"hk CRT 


babes, to „Bar vir. 


| 
1 Bar per Fine ibid. 
: is Bar 8 ibid. 
7. Bar de Diſſeiſn, ibid. 
1 5 Bar per Ta Deviſe & Armer, ibid. 
19. Bar per Terres in Tail, ibid. 
20. Bar der Diſcent, „ 65 
8 21. B per E theat, * ibid. 
22. Bar per ö ibid. 
123. Bar per ibid. 
24. ws per | | _ 
25. Bar de Cuſt umarie Terres, 655 
' 26, Bar de Rectories & Diſmes, ibid. 


Action for taking away Tythes, Non Cu, G. 
= /er4:# pro Quer, but not upon the Matter in 
Law as intended, ibid. 


Far by a Layman, that be was ſeized of Tythes, 
2 


Action for cutting, Cc. two Oaks. Bar, 
That he being a D cut them 
down for rebuilding an old Barn, bid, &- 657 

Several Obſervations on the aforeſaid Caſe, 
657 

Bar, by cutting down Timber for Repairs 
by hn Bailiff” 's Ap 1 Rep”, and 
traverſes thẽ Bailiff intment. Tra- 
verſe ill, and Bar ill, Ew pro Erg 

5 


4. 28. Bar 


Rept, and traverſes chat they were Tyites | 


ſevered, 656 
1. 2. If pleading a Seiſin, without ſayin jing | 
of what Eſtate, be good in a Bar, 
2, If a Layman may plead Sein of 
IT ythes, ibid. 
27. Bar 1 Arbres, | ibid. 


% 
— 
<2 
l ” 
. 
* 


* 4 88 3 * * — . 
* » * * Sd wth. 4 7 * tad * * 8 oo 4 Mr. 
3 * 4 * 19 * 8 * ». 4 * RE 
\ \ 1 <* = * , 2 6 4 
- - - 3 e * ; 
© _ 
: * 4 


9 , 


a ER * 4 —_—_— FR. * 4 N 
L * "Rp 0 Fo , N 7 4 1 p we J * * * "_ * * 
. - . * : 2 4 1 | SY I”; K 
%* . 14 Fa: 4 * ＋ oy 3 
N — e „ — „ - 1 Y 
* . * . 4 . 
= % = = hk 2 
G 3 \ * y 
F * 
* - * ” - 4 4 
* - 1 * 
CY 2 ay | 
#£ 


| 28. Bar de Avers, 


ven out amongſt others not commons. 


Jůoiader in Demurrer, Reo 41 Rep! ant 


- Defendant juſtifies in his Cloſe Damage. Feſam 


| js. Pp F G . Page 659 8 
Deſendant fays, he is Lord of the Manor, Bl © 
and put his Cattle into the Cloſe to feed; 

and that the Plaintiff s Sheep being dri- 


dle, he ſeparated them, G. wid 
RepP, by Demurrer td Part; atid as to the 

_ Reſidue, a Demand to deliver the Sh 
but Defendant refuſed, Fi 


traverſes the Requeſt and Refaſal, Dem 
inde, by reaſon of the vitious 1 ; 


4 


wich a Traverſe of the Place; and objed. 


ed, that the Traverſe was ill, Sed Quer, 
0 659, 669 


” 
* 
* 


Bar by Copybold dimiftit C. deſcendiil', 6: * 


Bar, by killing a tame Deer in his Lands, nt 


|  Injur* ſua prop, Verdict & Fudic pro D j 
29. Bar de Biens & By-Laws, 2 661 


Bar, That be killed the Plaintiff's Dog in pr 
Baer, That he kill'd the Plaintiff's Dog, bein 


ſter. Demir, & Fudic pro Quer, 


Demurr inde cum Canis, Et 1 pro Ou | 
mfr, ec. wir, Et Jud pro Yr \ 


knowing it to be ſo, _— 
fence of his own Dog, _ ih : 


Ferox, and entring into his Yard. Rep! l 


Pix. By * 1 of Poſſeſſion, Ge. b 
Property by Sale, by Gift, by Deliver 
by Pledging, by Finding, by Depredy 
tion, c. 661 

Bar by a Beadle of the * * Taylon i 

Exon, that he took the Goods by Vertue ol. 

By-Law for opprobrious — to the - 


I | Simi 


3 
\S 


BR PILAASPSE AA? T9. 


2 


SSS 


E 
wal” 


” - 2 * * 
* y oy — 
” -. * * 
— < * 
o 


« * 
1 os 4 
' 1 f by » þ " * 
Ne. 
e N es © * a 


mile per By-Law de lat Taylers Civit' L. G. 
e be fr e, Page 655 


+. 


Defendant uſtifies per Stat. concerning Tanners, 
Dem & Tudic pro Sur, bid & 664 
Defendant juſtifies by Statute for Preſervation 


of Game; and 2, it he ought not to plead 
F: ſpecially, MY. wid | 664 


Where Vi & Armis & bona ſua were omitted in 
the Declaration, and after Writ of Inquiry, 


for Default of a Plea, moved in Arreſt of 
Judgment, Sed non allocantur, ibid. 


30. Bar de Eſcripts, 665 


Viz, O4 Pater dedit pixidem cum Cbartit. 
Non cul de dilaceratione, That the Indenture 
was cancelled with Plaintiff's Conſent, 2 


31. Bar ſor Preſcription de Common, c. Viz. 


Bar per ſon Franktewement, & c. ibid, 


Where the Plaintiff pleaded a ſpecial and intri- 


cate Preſcription for Common, Defendants 
demurr*d ſpecially to the ſeveral Parts of the 


Replication, ibid. & 666 
Bar pro Coia quibuſſibet 2 Annis, &c. 666 
Bar pro Coia per Burgens? Burgi, & Quer demurr,, 

A „ 

No Advantage of Form on general Demur- 

ter, Ee Judic pro Def, | 667 


Bay pro Coia pro omnibus Averiis Coi calibus levam, 


and ſays not Cumbend. Plaintiff demurs, &- 
Judie pro Quer, ibid. 
Said that an intire Plea cannot be good in 
Part, and bad in Part, 668 
Tudic pro Quer for Default of Levant and 
© Couchant, ibid. 
Judie pro Quer for not ſhewing they were com- 
monable Cattle, or what Cattle in * 


Eee Di- 


A 4 \ . \ 75 PI” 
aha; Das N nn IO 
* \ kV \ 
, | 


j \ W. © 
* OS. 
4 * ' N L 


| The TABLE _ 
Directions to ſeveral other Pleadings relating to 
Common, as to the Years, Days, and 

Times, Cc. Page 669, 670 
32. Bar de Eſtovers, & c. 670. Vide poſtes 
Cuſtoms, 8 


. Pro Focali, pro Sepimento & Focali, pro Commun 


& Focali, a ER ibid, 
Pro neceſſar Focali, pro Reparation & focali, pro 
divers Co'iis, oy 671 
Pro Succifion bruere comburend', pro Succifion' Ar. 
borum reparand', | ibid. 


d' Def cepit pro Reparation nullo maeremi 


exiſten aſſign, ibid. 
33. Bar & Si bification de Chimin, 672 
uſtifications for ſeveral Sorts of Ways and Paſl. 
ſages, ibid, & 673, Oc, 
Juſtification of breaking down Poſts, Gs. 
674 


Where the Defendant ſaid not that the Gate 
was lock'd or nail'd. Et per Cur, It ſhall 


be intended, | 675 
If by Unity of Poſſeſſion a Way be deſtroy- 

ed, C 676 
34. Bar, Cc. de Incloſures, | 677 Þ 
Who ought to repair the Fences, and when and 
where, Cc. 678, &. 
Alſo concerning Cattle eſcaping for want of 

Incloſures, Cc. 680 


Whete the Preſcription for Common ought to 
be for Cattle levant and couchant, &c. bid, 


£7 rs Bars, ſeveral concerning Seiſin, W aits, and 


- GS ww ay. 


Eſtrays, Cc. ibid. 


Juſtification by Grant of Eſtrays under the 
Dutchy Seal. Demur & Fudic pro Luer, : 
quis Narr ds Vacca & Bar de Fuvenca, 681 


36. Bar, & c. de Wreck, 682 


37. Bar, Gr. de Warrens & Hunting, d 


38. Bat, 


48. Bar, e. de Cbaſes: And juſtifies killing of 
& is Hunting Dogs purſuing Deer. &c. Page 68 5 
| 39. Bar, Oc, de Fairs & Market:; and Juſtih- 
| cation. for ſeiſing Goods for Toll, Cc. with 
| e Rejoinders, Demurrers, and 


Judgments thereon, _ 684, Cc. 

, 40. Bar, &c, ſur Cuſtoms, and Juſtifications to 
. erect Stalls, &c. | 687 
D cepit Equum pro Tolneto in Villa tem” de Rege G- 
petit Auxilium, 8 689 
Q trans fait diebus Rogat ion, ibid. 

. Cuſtom pro Mortuario. | hid. 


Bar ſur Cuſtom de Heriot, whereby he took the 
. Cow, which afterwards had a Calf; and 
; that one V. took them from him, and deli- 


: ver'd them to the Plaintiff, and Defendant 
" retook them, 9 hid. 
Demur inde cum Not it, 690 


Bar per Demiſe of an Honour unde Manor fuit 
parcel, and ſhews a Cuſtom to diſtrain for 


Fines, ibid. 
Rep, No ſuch Cuſtom, & Def demur,, 
Sed Fudic pro defalt Def”, 69L 


Bar by Cuſtom to dig for Lead, and to carry 
away the Reſidue after Duties paid. Quer 
demur', & Fudic pro Quer for want of ſeve- 

ral Allegations, ibid. 

Juſtification to dig for Coals, per quod, Cc. RepP 
& Demur, &. Fudic pro Quer for Defendant's 


o bad Pleading. 692 
id, S Juſtifies by Uſage to dig for and carry away 
nd | Stones for Reparation of Houſes. Quer de- 


; murr, &. Tudic pro Quer ibid. & 693 
be Bar by Cuſtom to dig in the Common-ſhore 
„ for Ballaſt, 4 | ” 


Eee 2 Bar, 


TY 
* 
** 


nua * 
** TY =_ a 

+7" a7 -——_ 1 
N * 7.6 = 


— 


4 


Bar, aha juſtifies for Tal and Caftom in tlie 


Port of Lyn Regi, & Nur moratier, Page 69 


"Oh. That there is bo good Conktieratibn 
for the Toll, e. Dat the Cort fuckin 


SIA pls That the Owner. of Port may 
baue Toll by Preſcription, &*. 693, 694 


Trover, Bar inde, +. bog 


Efendant confeſſes the Converſion ; but 
pleads Acquittal in Conſideration of 2 
Promiſe to pay 205. Plaintiff derours, be- 
cauſe not averr'd that the 20s. were paid, 
2 Z 4 


Waft, & Bar inde, Ce. $4] 44 696 
Irections to ſeveral Bars, Sc. ibid. & 
| | V 

As to Houſes, Ponds, Wainſcot, G . 


eſendant pleads that the Leſſor died inteſtate, 
and no Adminiſtration to him. Rep?, That 


he enter d as Executor de injur prop. Deſen- 
dant demurs. Er Judic — Aa” 


Nul Maſt fait to divers Waſts A pocts Several 
Replications, Traverſes, and Averments, &*. 


% 699 

When and where the Statute ought to be reci- 
ted in the Writ, ec. | ibid, 
Directions to ſeveral other Bars, Oc. in Waſt, 
Joo, Oc. 


Abatement to the Writ by a Device pleaded 
over, and traverſes the Diſcent alledged. 
Plaintiff demurs generally, and the Traverſe 
held ill, but not on a general Demurrer, 702 


AS 


* * * 8 _ \ — 
* ; * "0 5 0 * 2 + , \ 
3 , I 7. . 8 * 8 * F W Naar 
1 4 * 4 = * % a0 \ 
ons » oe " . * hs 4 . TY 8 :, N * * K 
TR : 2” ' 25 — * 
3 a | 29 
þ \ g 2 ; 
” . 4 L 
x 7 * | | 
mY * J 
I) © wa, 1 \ A : 1 
: S a. + " 


+. W "x 2 ** * e 9 bs : 

e 
* * "Dy R A 4 4 

a 9 3 * . . 


2 ” ? « HA” 4 ad: | p 92 ? *%, 
wh : 7 2 F oF. * \ "28 F * 


"The 'T A B L k. 

As to View by Jarors i in an Action ob Waſt, 

4 Page fone bet 703 

| Obſervations u upon the late Act 4 & 5 Ame, 

| concerning the View, 703 

Were a Copybolder for Life demurr'd. to the 

Declaration of him in Remainder, 704 

II che Converſation be of greater Value. 2. If 

it be Waſt. ibid, 4 
That Waſt lies not in ancient Demeſne, Ce. 5 
o 0 
\ The Concluſi on of this Volume, with Rate 

ences to Judgments in Walt, &% ibid. &- 

N 706 
f 
N ] 
y — — 4 
t 2 
1 \ 
' 
2 q 
$ 


— 


— 


wt AL 


- 
. 
— 
* 
* 
Fy 
* 
* 
. 
— 
- 


FH 


IVSEVM 
BRITANNIC 


z 


