ADDO Abe Gullo 


Ly 


ee ae ot Ge me? PERE eS MEMES. res ee «ee 
Bch ah eh Bee ee ae ge Re | ee | ‘ 
ry ry al? G ov wy a te a 


| a aati a ut 
T ABLE 0 OF CASES... 


+" 
audhanbas 7 (OT 35 


; ‘ ‘ 
é witty ee | oi Been ei E 


” 


EASTERN DISTRICT. MARCH 1 TERM, isis. 


Dexmodes v8, Ibanez, Pad ee es 
pirt APRIL, .. : 
Seguin vs. Debon, 
Brooks’ Syndics, vs. Weyman,, 
General rule, 


: MAY. 
Brooks"“Syndica Us Lauer pst 


Fortier vs. Declouet, 
Bermudeéz’s Syndics ps. Ibanez 9 a. 
Lanusse vs. Massicot €& al, 

Laverty Ds. Duplessis, 

General rule, ' ’ 
JUNE. 
Lebreton vs. Nouchét, 

Rochelle & al. vs. Musson, 

Sigur’s Syndiés vs. Brown, ! 
Pizerot & al. vs, Meuillon’s heirs, 
General rule, ‘ebhontegs 


Allen vs. Guenon' €& al. 
Duplantier vs. St. Pé, | 

St... Pé vs. Duplantier, 

_ Knight vs. Smith, 

* Bermudez’ Syndics vs. Ibanez, 







































iP. ‘CHRONOLOGICAL ¢. 
WESTERN DISTRICT, AUGUST TERM; isis. 9 
; Agnes vs. Judi¢ey"! -f* » " wi - 
aga SRPTE RP EE, 4 
Agnes 08. Judice, es Ass 
OcTo BEE ee 
Cavelier and al. vs.’ Collins, ; ! 188 j 
EASTERN DISTRICT, NOVEMBER TERM, 1813. | a 
DECEMBER. en ae 
i Bapiaitice US. Randolph, ’' 194 q 
Hellis’ Syndics vs. a le ths 20r 
Williamson’s Sys. vs. Phillips’ Syndics, 905 
Kenner and al. vs. Morgan, gag 
Clark’s Ex’s, vs. Farrar,.°.+° B19 
Vaughan vs. Vaughan, ei ‘ 
Fromentin and al. vs. Prieur, © 8%! ir oid. a 
; JANUARY; 1814. 0° 
Rabassa and al. vs. Mayor, &c. Ne a 
Longer and al. vs. Pigeau, | 221 
Durnford vs. Brooks’ Syndi¢s, “~ » “904 ; 
| FEBRUARY. ir : 4q 
_ Riléy os. Lynd, — 4 228 
Dufican and al.’s Syndics vs. Duncan, : ree 230 
Duplantier vs. Pigmian, - : 236 
Clark’s E.x’s, and al, vs. Farrar, | amie 
Menendez vs. Larionda’s Syndics, 256 a 
Lanusse vs. Massicot & al. 261 
Durnford vs. Brooks’ Syndics, 269 


Brown vs. Kenner & al. . 270 


‘pd MARCH. 
General rule, 


— ‘ay 


os iacielaniai al cal 
Morse VS. Wilnounddtiie 
‘ Meunier vs. Duper) " ica 
ee | 


Dufau & al. vs. Massicot & al. 

be &c. vs. Metzenger,? 8 

acaioell 
- Mero: ec. ve. Seredick, 
- Harrod & al. vs. Lewis & al. 

Meriecult vs. Austing 9 1/ 4) {' 

Harper vs. his Creditors, fiefodac tt 25 note 

Lahbatut vs. Puche, po Teed he eo 8 ROLLE, _ 

Villeré & al. vs. Broghier; |’ C x 

Clark’s exr’s. vs. Cochran, 

Morel vs. Misotiere’s Syndics}: ot A Kt AggE 

Smith & al. vs. Elliot & al. a's 367 

Stu: Maxent’s Syndics vs. Sint; SACS Situ 

Blake and al. vs. Morgan,y)) ) 4 4.) 

Fram vs. Allen, ike tens 
JULY. be .ae ghana 
Ellenghaus & al’s. Byagive va Graviet, > > otgad! 
Pavie’s heirs vs. Cenasy ) ©: yi 5) 1 _. B87 
Brand vs. Livaudais &al. bord ao 168 
Cassou vs. Blanque, - a 890: 
Trimble’ s Syndics vs. N. O. Sane Canteens on (80H 
WESTERN DISTRICT./"AUGUST TERM, i814. 


Locust vs. Roy, Mange oe 
Harrison vs. Mager and aly, 1 
Sinnot vs. Mulhollan & al. 
Clark vs. Parham, 

4 Vernot vs. Yocum, 
Yocum VS. Roy ; 

















i ‘CHRONOLOGICAL 


Sennet vs, Sennet’s legateés, * ~ 4i1 
Reargan vs. Kitchen @ al’ 418 
Taylor vs. Porter, 493 
: SEPTEMBER: 
‘Brown & wife vs. Parish Judge, *" -” \) led 
Raper’ s heirs vs. Yocum, .iiiamieli os 40 4a ; 
O’Conner & al. vs. Barre,’ ** 46 
Mérgan’ s adr. vs. Whoories,* or xf oe IMF TO 062 
Cloutier vs. Lecomte, eiwo.d iy U8 2 Sota 
Grafton vs. Fletcher, 2 pti’ o"s rs 36 


Paillette &_ al. vs. Carr, Public: sénioh note, ; 
Martineau & al. vs. ‘Carr & al. pal be We he 


EASTERN DISTRICT, pECEMBER TERM, 18)45 


Beard vs, Poydras, <a ‘ sth "905 
- Villeré and al. vs. Brognier, 9 8 “307, 
MARCH TERM, tats.) 
Seven vs. Duncan & /al.’sSyndics;"° 530) 
MAY. a 
Blake and al. vs. Morgan,’ : 559 
Mizoticre’s Syndics vs. Coignard,” ~ 561 
@laiborne & al. vs. Debon & als’ "565 
Johnson vs. Duncan and al.'s Syndics, 570 
Fowiler’s Syndics vs. Dupassau, ©" °° Fifa 
Brognier 0%. Forstall, | “377 
Bourcier. ps. Lanusse, A: 58Y 
Fitzgerald vs. Phillips, 588 
‘Hopkins ws. ‘Peretz, S al. : “— 592 
Mayor &c. vs. Clark, oc tele ee 
Grieve’s Syndics vs. Sagory, 599 
Eliery vs. Gouverneur& ah) 606 


Brand vs. Livaudais & al. 








































— PABLE 
Delany vs. Trouvé-& ale. 


Se BS bi 


Vid, 
610 
Bujac & al. vs. 613 
Laverty veyGray oe ee 
Pome dee ne gore 622 
+ "ll vs. Da 640 
! -Krumbhaar v8. Ludeling, id. 
/ Seghers’ vs. Phillips’ Syndics, | 846 
oot 
665 
oie 

ag 
677 





~©=s- Michel vs. Aymé, sige ge a 
| Abat vs. Doliole, Bie AAS lap Blak Bog ta 


: ier, vs. Lanusse, 
gers: vs. Beiller, via ® te aide 
ae &c. vs. Casteres, ee 







ate) 


SOON «138 «sum onde 

‘eit nas ‘M¢Millan, ‘ # ity near 
‘Emmerson vs. Gray & al. eaten aan: 3 Se 

Menendez vs. Lationda’s pa ae 

es Police J UFY, Pe, Mayor)... hd O.. a 710 : 
WESTERN DISTRICT: avGuST: PERM; OTe: 


a Seoomart, ne Taha deian ‘s nv etch MEG: 


ct «beth ie 


Lalande vs. Fontenau,{? al. io i 


eres vs..Sompeyrac, : ein A 

: SEPTEMBER. |. 4). 29 bank! ! 
| = Ae 08s Traban’s heir, iw bis tite OE 

; = General rule, Tr 5s hades TM ts 
al : ryote é es 
“, STATES DISTRICT “COURT, JULY.-1819. 





United States ve. fi was ‘ 


ae 


ee. arden visa 
bi, mere 
ALP oll it: nn 


ate or G j " 


ee | 


J 
a ae 


Abat ads. Dolliole, Evidence, emit “ 657. : 1 
+ vs. Judice, Mandamus, renewal he suit ty 
ey 171, 


ys 
Allen ade. Fram, Settled accounts, bia rte at: 8 
‘Allen vs. Guenon, Pilotage, 17 cheval 128, 
Asselvo ads. Hellis’ Syndics, Statement, f fagf8 
Austin ads. Merieult, Referees, interest, » # ana 
Byiné ads. Michel, Bill Ff exchange, | aE tion. ie 


> ep 
wae pa 


Barré aides O'Conner & al: . Paraphernal aie 
Reard.vs,.Poydras, New. evidenety iii v, doy gg SOS 

Beiller ads. Rogers, Special Administrator, 665°. 
‘Bermudez’ s S, vs,: pecwariers.* Execution egestas tee 
: pe We, Superior Bomrt,, Oe. oe 
Biicander’ sSivs. ign & al. Stay iof proce aah 

Bermudez ads. Mayor & al.) Commons, .... - 
Blackman ads. Ogden, Criminal proceedings, #, 09 

Blanque ads. Cassou, Tacit morigage, ©" 

Blake & al. vs. Morgan; Freight) “oi othe a 
Bludworth vs. Sompeyrac, Citation intret Ft9 
: Bourcierivs.! Latiisse; Wifesten;’ . wore 661 
Brand vs. Livaudais & al. Written Contrast laf 
-" ‘Statement of facts, > ~ Sa a “389; 608 

Brognier vs. Forstal and wife, Wife's lien, <i SIT 
ads. Villeré & aly Written Contravt,326;:607" 













f 3 7) ks er, ae | 
J Brooks’ Syntinss ads. pirteds Sale, . “yy B92, 266 









= & 


fe. 2. 





Bujac & al. 93. Maes Sale ofa ase, 
an vs. Blanque, Tacit ‘nivinensy * Bats 390 
Casteres ads. Mayor, ‘tc. ‘Commons,’ “ 678 
B = Garr ats. Martineau & al, bussed, 497 
| & & ads. Paillette & al. “Public schookinote, °° 489 
B® . Gavelier& ai. vs. Collins’ heirs Evidence, interest, 188 4c 
B . Cenas vs. Pavie’s heirs, Sheriff, | 387 we 
| a Elaiborne & al. vs. Debon & al. nlestoniles bend, 568 ; 

> Clark ads: Mayor, Se Warranty,) 2) >> 596 : oe 
~ Clark vs. Parham, -Bitoohdae tppeol > A 80s 7 
| Clark's’ Bar's. we. Farraty,: Dismissal: of appeal, 





eal 
~ 






. ole yee : bee'l eng, 247 
pe RO 3. Cochran, epnenealanny:* 858 
é Cienier v8. hhezodieesodies judietitas *s 484 


-Cochtan ads. Clatk’s exts: Sijndtiire débhed, 353 
Coignard ads. Mizotiere’s Syndics, Insolvency, ' 56% 
Collins’ heirs ads. Caveliet & ald” Interest, evi 198 


‘Creditors ‘va? Harper, “Appeal, 3a 


WEN 
a Dauphin ade. Harang; Appealy. pee pe CMD 
Debon ads. Seguin; Work by the jaby) 2 os 6 
Debon & al. ads. Claiborne, Auctioneer’s tend, 565 
“Declouet ads. Fortier; ‘Bai/, “i th ee 
‘Delany vs. Trouvé & al. Privilege, - 610 
Doliole & al. vs. Abat, Evidence,’ 657 
*Dufau & al. vs. Massicot rs al. Constitution, 


SN See FS 8 OSS Sac aA oO 





of 
Tee 
; ‘ia 
ia 
ate 
yaa 
it 
Hi 
| 
is 
{ 
a) 
Hit’ 
j 
lag 
hi? 
1 a3 
| 
, a9 


i a se 


Pete a sj ae = . 
oe rs 
lawy ener Sat eyeill 
Bpessan 040: Pures: 3yn : 
property, > gia’ mS LM hs ” eee Me 
Bidberron sites Meanie join babii 
Duplintier. vs. Pigman,. Interest, 8 aber Ti 
vs. Ratidolph, ‘Bideney" a ped See 
08. SEP; “Sheereat, © ‘ 


Pies 


| Scant rea oh Sea 


Biter wi -Gouvetndhir't: aap ipso 

Bifenhaus & al’s, Syadies-@ii Grivier;:SGley's! 005 | 
Eiot & al. vey Sinith. & ah) ddachmenty:S eto SBOB 
ee Gray ‘&:ali een cee ta: 1 


Farrar ia Clark’s exect’s.. Appeal, ee te "stayed 
Fletcher ads. Grafton; Perales Se ae 
Fontenau,€Pal, ads. Lalande, us ransfer me 716 
Worstall.and wife vs. Brognier; Wife's len, lien, 2° “oF 
Fortier vs. Dedlouet;: Bail,» we aff, ryt . 
#romentin & al, vs. Prieur, Disinigoat oF wae 


Fowler’s Syndics os. Dupassau, Mortgage, ‘5 @ 


Fram vs. Allen, Settléd-actoumy °°"! Tevet 2 
Fitzgerald v8. weeps, Ccxsion ofironds, ae ee 


“i (je 3 f 
Wouvernenr. & alas. ‘Ellery; eer) fo. 606 — 
‘Grafton’ vs. Fletcher, . Parolevidencey i 
‘Gray & al. v8. Laverty; Farts | iyo. 2 -_ 
Gray & al ade. angerpn's ‘Byse Sequestrhiaty, 204 











| fellis’ Syndics 9 Menage 
‘ a ads. Peretz. € al. Adninieraar, 
ae hgh a ce gige wy ; 
gre ae ¢ es me 
= ads. Rermuder’s Syndics, Stay. of ArRén 
y oe on ads. Bermudez, Avemtion gf degeees = 


debns0n, ge-clbencan 2. ah's. Syadices Martigh.....cix 
cma aw, Qhligations of contract, Syndics, : i i 
| "scale eng ee ge aI AS sci 
} g RP: tte o's Hegde i Nici leat av, ae 
. ty GR 
| Kemper vs, sat Benes, Sane obey 1 ae 
- Kennet & al, yp..1 Mor AD», Bi dn 





ee 


Sis eae - 


phchlnteh beter dete TAKA. 


CSS = 








Wa 
Hell 
q 
&. 
ee 


= 


PVRS SHS SS 





B  Krumtlaar or ee £ me su Sou 
Ria ees Seti al ahi FH Pi 


‘Eabotut 08. Puche, Surisdiction, Sih oe | ae 
Lalande vs. au &.al.. Trai er Yj 
~ Lanusse vs. Bourcier, Wes Reh ose bey 661 
_ Parionda’s Sys, ad Menender, Bara, 266, * 
| ‘Baverty vs. Duplessis, Habeas Corpiisy | 
Be QRavertyva, Gray Bale Fevers ex ae side SS *: aay 






OR: partition, . ok ep Mee, 


Se: ment sean 3 
Liivaudais & al. : 
- Bonger al by i Sacaaibcepipicdap aa . 
Laing Krambhaar, Bill of Exchange, > 640 — 
ape US. Riley, Sijuntesion,’—" 3 aF aa bere P 
VER PN. 2. yet Ha ARE ae 
Kags ad aap Rie of Apbeah e . 
Martineau € al. vs. Carr + Diterropatoria, 0% ee 
Massicos, Fal. ade oo te whe Creetincien,. vad 
288 


: po pea Fora of hand, 40, 261. 
: Soe ve of Ni Oi'de. Casteress Commons,» (678. © 


“wa. Clarky Warranty," < $96 @ 


count 2h os Bertmadéz; Commoris i308 
os 7 vs. Metzenger, Arbitrary: SF 
ect prs SOB: ARE HEY he 296,647 q 
Biz fis » as. Police fury, Ferry, © TAG 
4 ads. Rabassa, ‘Tak, “bik, Cla . @ 
' Spree ads: Bujae 8? aly Sle gfe slapey. “inch. 
Menendez vs. : da’s: Syndics, Eo. * 956, 705 
Merieult vs: Austin, Referees, Interest.) he ols # 
Meuillon’s heirs vs,' Hintiee, Stenthipsion; mes ET 
nunciatiot F080 ea a og: de OF 
Metzenger ads. Mayor &¢ shears grant, 296, 647 | 
Meunier ads. Duperron;: -Foint lability,’ ig 4 @ 
Michel os. Aymé;. Bill.of. exchange, . 2 
Mitchell vs. M‘Millan, Foreign boi, vin 7 
M’ Millan‘ads. ‘Mitchell, .'-. Jd,» ot | = 
Mijzotiere’s Syndics vs, Coiguardy: aay 4 in 7 
ads. Morel, Gounsel fecs, 363 





See Sme 


o ; 
— 
. + 


wae 


2. - ee. 
xo 
& eat 


sos bald edekcagei anna Pati fleas eel 
Miarse ve. Williamson alls. Syndice fees, oo < 2QR° 


den At 4; ick va: vies 


Roe a si Matting wri, 


ete" 


© © Connét & al: ve; Barres Piibhoraa bipene, 464 


Ogden vs. Blackman, Cristie’ i rg ab 303 
BBE OP Meet 0,088 as 


Pisce, Gabe: Gun PN hel, nee 
Puvie’s heirs vs. Cenas;. Sheriff, iy ' 387 


_ Batish Judge: -“ _— op wg NRE. 


: Parham ads. Clark, Frivolous atin _* - 405 
* “Retetz & al. adss:Hopkins, Sdilisintneraies, +9590 


Phillips ads. Fitzgerald; Cession 0f goods, «588 


Phillips’ Syndite = Seéghers,. “Attovtieg?e feexy Gi ° 


we Be ads. Williamson’s,. insolvent, «208 
Pigeau ads. Kenier id Ae peRS sPRH 


a _ Pigman eds. Duplantiér, Interest, Dae |) 
--' Pizerot ads. Meuillon’s sae Precripion. 


<.\ reriuneciation, 


Police Jury vs. Mayor, fc, Ferry, 
Poydras ads.‘ Beard, Mew Evidenie, 
‘Prieur ads. Fromentin &9 al. Dismissal of Appeal 295 


Puche aie: er ee 


alle *- — 


.— 


yy OF 
~~ Porter ads. Taylor): ‘Seatclaens of * facts, - = AB 
is 3 ps 





. 
ALPHABETICAL 


Babeste vs. Mayor, 8 ¢6 Fame. eivinntl eo. —) 
sevice Soom Ses 96 
Ksheire\vs,. Focumy, Perol.Evidence, = 
Reargan vs, Kitchen & Weegee: bf ese 
Riley ads,:Lynd,. Jijunctiany vo ee 
Rochelle & al.:wss; Musson, Enidgncey: 1 - apes Oe 3 
Bogers vs. Beillery:Specialsddminintratory 9.2.06 
Raiy vs. "Yocum, neem openers . 001, | 
yn We 
‘ Sagory adi Grieve’ $ ‘Syriatee. at ear et ‘nated 599 
Air: Maxent’s Syndics ug, Sigur, Spanish suse: ; 
St. Pe vs. Duplantier, Interest, 
Sennet ds. Sennet, . Natural Ghildren, 


Seguin vs. Debon, Work by the job, : ee" 
Sigur’s Syndics ve, Brown, Ceded property, ©! GA” 
Sigur vs. St. Maxent’s Sys.. Spanish RS ine or 


Sinnot vs. Muthollan &9 al. Ameridment, |. (498 9 
Smith vs. Knight, Will, ow 156 

ads. Kemper, Partnership, ee 
Sompeyrac ads. reer Gijation; intro, — , 


‘Taylor vs. Porter, Statement Wf fabs spe aed 
Trahan’s heirs ads. Broussarts Continuance, 714, 725 | 


Trimble’s Syndies #6..N- Os.Ins. Co- Insurance, 396 i 


Trouvé & al. ads. Dalen tens 
United States D8. ils e ‘< Citizenabity ; 


_ Vaughan vs. Vaughan, Fudge’s charge, . af | 


' Yernot vs. Yocum, Evidence, “406 


Villeré & al, os. Brognier, Written contract, 326, am 


% 


ay 
ve 
t 









J 6o)PRBEES A ; ae 
Brooks?’ Syndics, Ventre, itbw trialyoj@ 






faire soy Pigs phkee was dager’ 


“Bineal Raed, © 1 ABS ay 908 





197 BY: nonats get tae x32 

BY : 4 ‘ pa 

4 op » . : tHe 
Tas ae Site ribs bo bee bopyr tay ee. | ; 

6 a a % ¢ * : ti oe 


> 

‘ & See PUGS ak ae ea: i Che OP RS a Lge 
ok Ba ee Merten elf ata Ba 
ee Sate, og TS mellow i, sa saad 
156 Be) AVR, cdgiad aw giles 

628 ) 2 ee te Pe Tihs hoe Mele asa “ee 
co: & Yolo date at, TA wh Pie chin sxchogmek 
OP Ae. cok & Newt. ore extol 
pe tes 2) copa ened beaaedlander® 
394 a RR? >, ' ms one ok <5, A yi ghey Mi t abd e 


‘Sia F 








: 
. a 











“S280 T * 









| Uta veo Parguse “eyoo et ay Pepryeo ; i 
ey Sold aatee or eee aT ae <5 email 
LOM wibayP eons l %) ave ah | 













mc yaa To teapili Te Re ae ee 4 
Othe organisétion ‘of th . cording: 
ig to the Constitution, the following Toalomes werd 







“Meypported swititee ” vel ted voiaal a a oe ites Lop ae 
eR. oR . q 


‘ Judges of the»Supfeme Cone, 


DOMINICK AUGUSTIN.HALL, 
“GEORGE! MATHEWS, and ote fe 
PIERRE DERBIGNY. if) 














Paastcoi-Kavini Mant, re seg mg 4 r 
On the 34 of July, 1813) Judge’ ail resigned hie 9 
ee having been’ dppointed ‘District Judge of tlie” 

ed States; for the Lauisiana District ; and on. the | 
a of February, gs: 









FRANCOIS-XAVIER MARTIN, was appointed ? 
his stead, and ine 4 
: ; 5 “fP ¢ } 4 
Erzennz Mazerzav, Attorney-General. 

omen 
a 
Py . 


