Abercrombie and Knox ............... 997 
Allen atid Davie .....0.....cscccecesss 164 
Allen et al and Wilkinson ............ 128 
Allen, et al v. M’ry R. R. Co. et al...437 
Allred and Powell ...............000- .318 
Anderson and Clk Co. C. Lowndes, 410 | 
Anderson and Watson & Watson.. 43| 
Anderson v. Brooks...............++0-+8 ‘9 O3 | 
Andress, et al v, Crawford, use, g-c. 853 
Andress. v. Longmire’s Adm’r, &c, 166 
Andrews & Hall, Adm’rs, v. Burns, 
Adm’r ) 
Armstrong 'v. Dargan & Mays 
PSE © Tiss ivonisniivnnesscdies 394 
Baldwin, et al v. Gully 
Bank of the State and Riggs, ct al.160 
Bank of the State and Riggs, et al.183 
Bank Br at Mobile and Godbold...... 191 
Bank of the State and E. B. & J 
COME .0554:;.. athe 
Bank Br at Decatur + v. . Rhodes 8 
Bank Br at Mobile v. Caldwell .. 
Bank State Ala and Gary, et al 
Bank at Mont’ry and Henderson. ...855 
Beason v. Riddle 
Beavers & Jemison v. Smith......... 20 
BEE Bs MTOROROG 5. ccttnnsecsacadsssaed 685 
Benham and Savage 49 
Bigelow & Co. and De Witt.........480 
Billingsley v. Harrell 5 
Bird and Comelander ................++ 913 
Bishop’s Heirs v. Hampton .........254 
Bothwell, et al and Watson, et al...650 
Bowen v. Snell, use, &c 379 
Boyd ¢& Macon v. Mclvor 
Bradford v. Haggerthy..............5 698 | 
Brooks and Anderson ...............06+ 953 | 
Broughton v. Robinson 
Brown, use, ¢-c.and Taliaferro 


87 
1009 


Brown and Hale, et al 

Brown v. Isbell 

Br Bk at_M’ry and Gilchrist 

SOOM OI RAIN 550 ti05-0054ts+ 0 ge0500s0 217 

Burns, Adm’r, and Andrews bce Hall, 
Adm’rs - ‘ 

Burt, use, “$e. Vv. Hughes . 

Butler v. "Butler 

Butler and Butler .....................66 

Butler v. Lee.. 


oe 


Caldwell v. Br Bank Mobile 

Caldwell v. Harrison 

Calhoun, et al and McCartney, et al 110 

Camp v. Hatter 

Campbell’s Adm’r v. Campbell’s cre- 
Nid vcrc5ced ncsarwniedecann sine aall 730 

Campbell’s creditors and Campbell’s 
Adm’r 

| Cameron, Ex’r,y. Clark,Smith & co.259 

Carter v. Pickard 673 

Castles, et al and Ledbetter... .149 

Cawthom v. Knight, Guardian, §e 579 

Cawthorn y. Knight. 26 

Chandler y. McPherson, et al 

Chandler and Faylkner & Faulkner 725 

Chandler and Glover, use, &c 

Child and Locket 

City Council Mont’y and Murphy...586 

Clarke, and another, and Crayton, 
use, &c 787 

Clark, Smith ¢ co. and Cameron, 
Be siccassel bs 0:00 oe % 

Claiborne v. Harris, and another......647 

Clarissa, a slave, and The State.... 

Clarke, T. J. §- 8. v. Gary 

Clealand v. Walker 

Clements and Wooley 

Clements, &c. v. Modre 

Clements vy. Elliott -360 

Clerk Co. Ct. Lowndes vy. Anderson 410 

Clopton v. Martin 

Coker and Robertson 466 

| Colgin, E. B. §-J.v. The State B’k, 229 


| C olgin and — 





velop, & Son 

| Come ay Sv. McCord.. aay 

| Comelander v. Bird.. ek sand 
2|C onnelly’ s Adm’r, et al Vv. Kavan. 
702 
Cie. a 152 


Conner v. Tack 

| Cox'v. Easley, ef al:.........csreasces -362 

| Cox v. Williamson 343 

| Crawford, use, &c. and Andress,et al 853 

Crayton, use, &e. v. Clark, et al 

Cross v. Worrall 

Curry & Haynee v. Robinson, use, 
&c 266 

Dargan & Mays and Armstrong ...506 

Dargan vy. Waring, ct al............. -988 

Davis -v. Allen ee .164 











TABLE OF 


CONTENTS. 





at vy. Portis, Judge, &c....104, 


Hancock and Moore.. isoneee 

Pe WWRINMMANTT .......... 00000000 204 | Hanrick, et als and Fitz; patric! k .783 

es d & co. and Stewart, 844 | Harrell and Billingsley 775 

: Witt Vv: low & co............: 480 | Harrison and Caldwell.. 755 

Di cs: wal Hindman..... .689 | Harrisoh and Hooe................... .499 
’ Doe ex dem,’ Farmer’s Heirs v. Es. Harris, and another, and Clai- 

lava... SIEMIEMis 6's ctecncccccsce. 1028 borne.. re ars ii ..647 

Doe ex dem. Kennedy’s Ex’ss v. Hatter and C amp. cooks mi 

pS OE 3 | Hawkins’ Adm’rs and Nations.......859 

Doswell, et al v. Stewart...............6 629| Heirs of McVoy v. Hallett & Walker 864 

: Doth rd, et al and Reynolds......... 531 | | He mmingway v. Moore and Cren- 

f Douglass, et al v. Terrell, treasurer, 583 RN. ccclcassicaniace 645 
Downman and Frow & Ferguson. .880 | Henderson and Prosser..... .484 
Drinkwater v. Holliday .............. 134} Henderson & Hudson vy. Gandy’s 
Easley, et al and Cox...............3.. 362} Adm’r ... po “4: 31 
Eatman, et al and Miller............... 609 | Henderson vy. Bk at Mor mtgomery . 
Edwards v. Gibbs, Judge, use, &c.292 | Herrington and Self .. ; "489 ) 
Eldridge, and another, v. ‘Turner, Herrin v. Woodward....... soseetied aa 

ei idis hp deavans assnessnineseenever 1049 Hightower, et al vy. Kenned y, et al. 562 
Elliott and Clements..................+ 366 | Hindman vy. Dill & co................+. 689 
BE WE CEE 6, 85.5 «20 0cse0c0sss00s 632 | Hines and ver ee 634 


Eslava and Doe ex dem. Farmer’s 


| Hobson and Jacott, ‘Smith, Bright 


nL. cle casenapeacsonienat 1028 & Jones... aa A434 
Everett and Martin................. .375 Holliday and Drinkwater 134 
Ezzefl and Monroe ..................++¢ 603} Holt and Oliver ........... 574 
Falls v. Weissinger ...............+0+¢ -801 | Hvoe v. Harrison.. ..499 
Faulkner & Faulkner v. Chandler. 725 | Hooper and Nance nice ee 
Fisher & Phelps and Sanders ....... 812 | Hoot, et al v. Sorre 1, et < /.386 
Fitzpatrick v. Hanrjck, et als.........783 | Houston v. Stanton & Stanton...... 112 
Freeman v. McBroom, et al ......... 943 | Howe and Pearson ............00.++008-370 
Frow & Ferguson v. Downman....880 | Hughes and Burt, use, 571 
Gamble’s Adm’r and Gamble ....... 966 | Hughes v. Ringstaff 563 
Gamble vy. Ganible’s Adm’r ....... 966 | Hunle 2y’s Ex’rx v Shuford .203 
Gandy’s Adm’r and Henderson & | Hunt, et al and Lyon, et al............295 
pe re 431 | | Hyslop & Son and Collins & co......508 
Garrett and Ricketts, et al............ 806 | Ingersol and Pinkard .................- 9 
Gary et al v. Bank State Ala......... 771 | Isbell and Brown. . .........c+es00+++- 1009 
Ne Ws COMI <<<. ntaresopsseecsecesers 514 | Ives and Thompson... .239 
Gary and T. J. & S. Clarke......... 98 | Ivey and Phifer ...... 535 
Gayle and Pearson, et al ............. 278 | Ivy and The State ...........s0ss000+ 47 
Gibbs, Judge, use, &e. and Edwards292 | Jacott, Smith, Bright & Jones v. 
Gilchrist v. Br Bk at Montgomery, 408 NNR er no, sccisnmamentl 134 
Gilder v. Jeter.................+:...++--.256 | Jeter and Gilder. 256 
Givens ¢ co. v. Robbins, Painter, | Johnson and Neil........ jascudecdee 
ag eae, bla i Stee epee 156 | Jonesy and another, and Welch......660 
Givens, use, &c. v. Rogers, et al...543| Jones and Doe ex dem. Kenne dy’ s 
Glassel and Waddel. ...............++++ 568} Ex’rs.. %s SS ol ER 2 4. 63 
Glover, use, &c. v. Chandler, et al.161/ Jones v. Kolisenski .................- 607 
Godbold v. Br Bank Mobile,......... 191 | Julian and wife v. Reynolds ....960 
Gookin, v. Richardson.................. 889 | Kavanaugh and Connelly’s Adm’r, 
Gordon and Trammell & McCarty.656| etal . ..169 
Governor, use, &c. v.. Stonum, Kenan, Ex’x, and Starke & Moore, 818 
SEE -.Ginveabinsesaghanssremakipnues 679 | Kennedy, et al and Hightower, et al 562 
b | Gray and Kyle..........0......:.s00se0 233 | Killcrease and Bell 685 
‘ Green, et als. and Terrell, et als...... 207 | King v. Bucks eaeand 217 
Gully and Baldwin, et al............... 716 | Knight and Cawthorn... ....268 
Haggerthy and Bradford ............. 698 | Knight and Speight. ... ..46] 
Hale and Westmoreland, ¢<, ....... 122 | Knight, Guardian, gc. and Caw- 
Hale, et al'v. Brown............:...... 87 IN BAERS 579 
Hallett ¢ Walker and Heirs of Mc- Knight and Smith & Bowdon ...... 618 
FOG vancccrcccccccccsccsnccersessseesees 864 Knight v. Turner’s Ex’: 636 
Hampton and Bishop’s Heirs....... .254 | Knox v. Abercrombie 997 















































TABLE OF 


CONTENTS. 





Kolisenski and Jones ...........+++++.607 


Krebs, Ex’r, and Nicholas............ 230 
Kyle v. Gray Lin Guesdbediniiakaarns< cee 233 
Li acy, Terrell & co. v. Rockett...... 1002 
Lang, et al v. Pettus ..............+0. 37 
La Roque & Hatch and Russell...... 352 
Lawrence and Turnet................+. 426 
Ledbetter v. Castles, et al ............ 149 
Be IEE dic ccdsdaacess cccassense 885 
Leigh & co. v. Lightfoot ............ 935 
Lightfoot and Leigh ¢ co............ 935 
Litchfield and McClure ...............337 
Locke v. Noland and Noland ...... 249 
ee | eee 640 
Lockwood, et al and Pond, et al...... 567 
Logan and Rowland, et al............ 663 
Longmire, Adm’r, &c. and Andress 166 
Lovett and Lovett .:..4:.....0.000005 763 
DE, BNE sas bhovaddepessagisgien 763 
Lyon, et al v. Hunt, et al ............ 295 
Mahone v. Reeves _....s0.....0...005 345 
Marshall and Traylor ...........-...-++ 458 
Massey v. Steele’s Adm’r ............ 340 
Martin and Clopton ...........0:..+6. 187 
pO, ee eee 375 
Mauldin, Montague & co. and Rob- 
inson & Caldwell ..................977 

McAlexander and Wright ............ 236 
McBeth v. McBeth ..................! 596 
McBeth and McBeth..................596 
McBroom, et al and Freeman ......943 
McCartney, et al v. Calhoun, et al, 110 
McClure v. Litchfield...........0:.....387 

McCord and Comegys... erreT 
McCullough, et al v. W alton ......492 
McGaha, Adm’r, and Parker and 

RE RO ae AM Fee Perey 
McGehee and Walke.................. 273 
McIvor and Boyd ¢& Macon ...... 822 
MelLane v. Spence, Adm’r............ 172 
McPherson, et al and Chandler...... 916 
McVoy’s Heirs v. Hallett § Walker,864 
Miller v. Eatman, et al................ 609 
Miller & co. and Walker, et al...... 1Q67 
Milton v. Rowland _................... 732 
Mitchell v. Sanford .................. 695 
Moore and Clements, &c............ 35 
Moore v. Hancock _...........e...00¢ 945 
Moore v. Ponders........:.<....ccccce0s 815 
Moore & Crenshaw and Hemming- 

WORE snc atin esesiisesyentinnsscieadea 645 
Monroe v.’ Ezzell.................esec00 603 
Montgothery City Council and Mur- 
Mont’y R. R. co. v. Allen.. +437 
Morgan v. The State ....-............. 289 
Moyler v. Moyler...........0....0000005 620 
Moylerand Moyler .................. 620 
Mullikin and Hines ..... wise tee 
Murphy v. City Conncil Mont’ ; eee 986 
Myer, etal v. Rives .................. 760 





Nance v. Hooper...............2.0:2+.052 ! 






Nations v. Hawkins’ Adm’rs .....859 










Neil Vv. Johnson. ..:.stsc03 coscuanees 
Nicholas v. Krebs, Ex’r ....... 
Noland & Noland and Locke.......249 ~ 
Nolly v. Wilkins, Adm’r, &e © ......872 
Officers Cir. Ct. Mobile and Patter- 
son, 6t, alt.....s.:ccdeedse.debloteie 740 
Oliver WOEIsy, 105. .80ictimcteieg’ 632 
Oliver v. Higie? ‘isc. sibsssaiseneaats.; 574 
Page, and another, v. The State...... 849 
Parker and wife v. McGaha, Adm’r, 521 
Paschall v. Whitsett ..024..<sive.ifo0 472 
Patterson and Sawyer’s Adm’r...... 523 
Patterson, et als vy. Officers Cir. Ct. 
MND , .cloveacsedatbileeseccus aad 740 
Paullin and Taylor. ...............+6+ 512 
Pearson Vs. Bo; ics oiiess cock ccctseaad 370 
Pearson, et al v. Gayle...............004 278 
Pettus and Lang, etal — .........4.. 37 
Betty vs Waller... clecsaetentaed 143 
Phiter and lyey. 2.150002 dssts ccsied 535 
Pickard and Carter ...........0..0005 673 
Pinkard vy. Ingersol...........cee..002 9 
Ponders and Moure  ...........0...6+ 815 
Pond, et al v. Lockwood, et al...... 567 
Portis, Judge, &c. and Dean, et’al. .104 
Powell VW. PANPOE sci dcasicscdeccs cntendee 318 
Price v. Thomason © ..........ccccces< 875 
Prosser v. Henderson .............0..0. 484 
Puryear & Williamson and Weaver, 941 
Ragan and Ulrick, et al ........... +529 
Reeves and Mahone, .,..¢...........06 345 
Reynolds’ Adm’rs y, Reynolds’ Dist 1023 
Reynolds’ D. and Reynolds’ Ad’rs, 1023 
Reynolds v. Dothard, et al... 531 
Reynolds and Julian ‘and wife ......960 
Rhodes and Br Bank at Decatur...283 
Richardson and Gookin ............ 889 
Ricketts, et al v. Garrett .....%....4 806 
Riddle and Beason © ................. .743 
Riggs, et al v. The Bank of the State 160 
Riggs, et al v. The Bank of the State 183 
Ringstaff « and Hughes...........s.000 563 
Rives and Myer, Rt 760 
Robbins, Painter ¢ co. and Givens 
Be Winiciiitinsiinnr Mietiatae 156 
Robertson v. Coker .............%.... 466 
Robinson and Broughton ............ 922 
Robinson, et al v. Robinson..........., 947 
Robinson and Robinson, etal ...... 947 
Robinson g- Caldwell v. Mauldin, 
Montague ¢ co —.......... sc ecceeee 977 
Robinson, use, &e, and Curry and 
NG” wucckntcssbeusanaceptantepauee 266 
Robinson and Smith .................. 270 
Robinson and Smith .................. 840 
Rockett and Lacy, Terrell & co...1002 
Rogers, et al and Givens, use, &e 543 


Rogers v. Russelll......2...+. sesteatssses 456 
Rowland, et alv. Logan ............ 663 
Rowland and Milton .................. 732 
Russell v. La Roque & Hatch ...... 352 



















TABLE OF CONTENTS 







































fl and Sebesssoncoeess+ceeee400 | Laylor v. Paullin.................sccccee! 512 » 




















lussell and EES 497 | Taliaferro, Adm’r,v. Brown, use, &c 702 ae 
"Rutledge, Adm’r, and Spence, et al, 557 | Terrell, et als v.Green, etals .....207. |) 
oe Adm’r, &c. and Spence, Terrell, Treasurer, and Douglass, ei 
et al . eo Sey ae E " 
Sanders 1 Vv. "Fisher and Phelps ssttad 812| Thompson and Venable _............ 147 ' 
Sanford and Mitchell .................. 695 | Thomason and Price ..................875 
Savage v. Benham, Adm’r............ 49 | Thompson and Spence Pispie elias takes 746 z 
Sawyer’s Adm’r v. Patterson. ......523 | Thompson v. Ives ed oo = 
alk C Tan cthetenassssns.s...... 189 | Filton v.. Huasell ......c..scccsesssovsases 197 
Sellers, Guardian, &c. v. Smith...... 264 | Trammell and McCarty v. Gordon, 656 
Shreeve and Knapp v. The State, 676 | Traylor v. Marshall ................+ 458 
Shuford and Hunley’s Ex’x............203 | Tubb and Sledge, Ex’r —............383 
Sledge, Ex’r, v. Tubb.................. 383 | Tuck and Conner _............0..005 794 
Smith and Sellers, Guardian, etc....264 | Turner’s Ex’r and Knight............ 636 : 
Smith v. Robinson _................0: 270 | Turner and Brown _..................752 t 
Smith and Beavers and Jemison.... 20 | Turner, etc. and Eldridge, “and an- e 
Smith & Bowdon v. Knight _...... cee DO TES ,. 1049 f 
Smith and Atwood .,..........se.0+0s 894} Turner v. Lawrence ..........e0.000e: 426 ; 
Smith v. Robinson —...............+4. 840 | Ulrick, et al v. Ragan..................529 
4 Snell and Bowen, use, &c............ 379 | Venable v. Thompson.................. 147 
Sorrell, et al and Hoot, etal ...... 386 | Waddell v. Glassel —..,...............568 
Spears and Williams .......... coll 138 | Wafford and Petty —..........6....... 143 
Speight v. Knight —...........+...045 461 | Walke v. McGehee .................. 273 
Spence, et al v. Rutledge, Adm’r, 557 | Walker and Clealand.................. 1058 
Spence, et al v. Rutledge,Adm’r, g-c 590 | Walker, et al v. Miller & co ...... 1067 ; 
Spence v. Thompson .....,-.........+. 746 | Wall v. Williams, use, &c............ 826 a 
Spence, Admm’r, and McLane Lecacanad 172 Walton and McCullough, ct al......492 . 
Stanton & Stanton and Houston, 412| Waring, etaland Dargan ............988 
Starke and Moore v. Kenan, Ex’x, 818 | Watson and Watson vy. Anderson... 43 
State and Weissinger ..................540 | Watson and Strange, et al............324 
State and Page, and another....... .849 | Watson, et al y. Bothwell, et al......650 
State Bank and Riggs, et al.......... 160 | Weaver v. Puryear and Williamson, 941 
State Bank and Gary, etal ...... 771 | Weissinger v. The State ........... 540 
es errr 47 | Weissinger and Falls .................. 801 
State v. Clarissa, a slave ............ 57 | Welch v. Jones, and another ...... 660 
State Bank and Riggs, et al............ 183 Westmoreland, etc. v. Hall............ 122 
State Bank and E. B. and J. Colgin, 222 | White v..Strother, et al ............ 720 
State. amd Morgan. ....:..0..sceccceee 989 Whitsett and Paschall................+- 472 
State and Shreeve and Knapp ...... 676 | Wilkinson v. Allen, et al ............128 
tn UPON 5500 asicn0cescccoeccse 594 | Wilkins, Adm’r, and ES: 872 
Steele’s Adm’r and Massey............ 340 | Willis ums, use, etc. and Wall ......826 
Stewart and Doswell, et al............ 629 | Williams v. UE, * iccnetdenekincsans 138 
Stewart v. Desha, Sheppard & co...844 | Williamson and Cox ..................343 
Stoker, et al v. Yerby..........0.....00 322 | Windham and Dearing _...........- 204 
Stonum, Adm’r, and Governor, use, | Woodward and Herrin ............ 792 
a EE Sere ne a es 679 | Wooley v. Clements ..........ss0.000 220 
Strange, et al. v. Watson............. 324 | Worrall and Cross —...............--+108 d 
Strother, et al and White.............720| W right v. McAle »xander a 
Swan v. The State  ....cccccccsess 594 | Yerby and Stoker, etal  ......0.++.322 





