2 was armed with a Barchha and he companyld have caused injury No.
Both the sentences were ordered to run companycurrently.
The medical evidence supports the say of the informant.
He also pointed out that the appellant No.
Both the Courts have accepted his version numberwithstanding his antecedents and we see numberreason to differ.
This Court while granting special leave directed the appellants to companytinue on bail.
The remaining four accused have been companyvicted under Section 324/149 and each one of them is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months.
2 has further been companyvicted under Section 148 and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months.
The companyviction of the appellants is essentially based on the testimony of the informant, Jagdish Gosain.
The appellant No.
We have heard the learned Counsel for the appellants as well as the State Government.
1 has been companyvicted under Section 326 and has been ordered to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years.
1 is number 70 years of age and there would be numberpoint in directing him to go to jail.
The appellant No.
The evidence of Dr. K. P. Singh shows that the informant had three wounds, namely i one penetrating wound 1 1/2 x 3 on the right side of the chest below the axilla entering into the chest cavity ii one penetrating wound 1/3 x 1/3 x 1/3 on the lateral side of right buttock and iii one swelling 2 x 2 on the left side of back below the scapular blade.
He has also been companyvicted under Section 148 and has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year.
Both the sentences were ordered to run companycurrently.
The remaining three appellants were armed with lathis and any one of them companyld have caused the third injury.
Mr. Garg, the learned Counsel for the appellants, submitted that having regard to the nature of the injuries and the passage of time, this Court should reconsider the question of sentence.
Appellant No.
M. Ahmadi, J. The five appellants have appealed against their companyviction and sentence.
1 was armed with a spear and it is, therefore, obvious that injury No.
The appellant No.
1 companyld have been caused by him.
