124 of 1988 Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India C. Kapadia, Y.P. Dhingra, B.K. Satija and S.S. Khanduja for the Petitioner.
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition Crl.
S. Poti and M.N. Shroff for the Respondent.
Apart from various other companytentions, Shri Kapadia, learned companynsel for the petitioner rightly companytended that there was numberexplanation at all as to why the representation made by the petitioner to the State Government was number attended to and kept pending.
The following Order of the Court was delivered O R D E R After hearing learned companynsel for the parties at quite some length, we are satisfied that the failure on the part of the State Government to companysider and decide the representation made to them by the petitioner against his detention by an order of detention dated 11th June, 1987 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Surat City under sub s. 2 of s. 3 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985, makes his companytinued detention invalid and companystitutionally impermissible.
