The post was also on year to year basis as the grant in aid of the Central Government in relation to the said project was on that basis.
It carries out various research activities through various schemes projects.
It was so directed from the date of filing of the wit petition i.e. on 25.2.1998.
the date of filing of the writ petition and number from the date of her initial appointment.
It was in the aforementioned backdrop, the Tribunal opined that the services of the respondent herein should be directed to be regularised.
The terms of appointment demonstrates that the same was also on year to year basis.
The appellants herein preferred a writ petition there against before the High Court of Judicature at Madras.
The said writ petition was ultimately transferred to Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras, in view of a numberification issued by the Central Government under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
However, the project companytinued for a long time for one reason or the other.
By reason of the impugned judgment dated 10.2.2005 the High Court, while allowing the writ petition of the respondent, dismissed the writ petition of the appellants herein and directed that the services of the respondent should be regularised from the date of her initial appointment i.e. 1.4.1975.
The said project was carried out in the States of Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, West Bengal and U.P. For the aforementioned purpose, the Central Government admittedly grants grant in aid on year to year basis.
The respondent also filed a writ petition questioning that part of the order whereby regularisation was directed to be made w.e.f.
Respondent herein was appointed by reason of an offer of appointment dated 1.4.1975.
One of such projects is called National Nutrition Monitoring Bureau.
Respondent prayed for regularisation of her services, but the same having been rejected, she approached High Court of Madras seeking for a direction to the respondents to regularise her services with retrospective effect from such date as it deemed fit and proper.
The Tribunal numbericed that although a decision was taken that the project should be made a permanent one and its activities should be expanded, but numbersuch order was passed.
B. Sinha, J. Appellant No.
1 Indian Council of Medical Research ICMR is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act.
It is engaged in research activities in the field of medicine.
Both the writ petitions were heard together.
