The request of the appellant to accept the certificate issued by the Tehsildar in 1987 and number to insist upon the production of a fresh certificate from the Revenue Divisional Officer was turned down and the appellant was told that if he did number produce the certificate from the Revenue Divisional Officer on or before 30th December, 1995, his name would be left out of companysideration for appointment.
That certificate was number acceptable by the Port Trust and on 20th November, 1995, the respondent Port Trust required the appellant to produce latest original Community Certificate from the Revenue Divisional Officer.
It appears that the appellant was called for an interview for appointment to the post of Mazdoor by the respondent by the letter dated 19th August, 1995 and subsequently he was called to appear for an interview on 17th November, 1995 together with all the testimonials and certificates.
The appellant filed a Writ Petition in the High Court of Madras seeking a Mandamus to the Chief Engineer, Madras Port Trust respondent herein to accept the Community Certificate of the appellant dated 10.3.1987, issued by the Tehsildar, Mambalam, for the purpose of his appointment as a Mazdoor in the Madras Port Trust.
A Writ Appeal was filed.
It is these two orders which have been put in issue before us in this appeal.
A learned Single Judge of the High Court on 8th February, 1996, referred to G.O.M.S. No.
The appellant appeared before the respondent and produced the relevant documents including the Community Certificate issued by the Tehsildar, Mambalam, Madras, dated 10.3.1987.
That Writ Appeal came to be dismissed on 29th February, 1996 by the Division Bench.
We have heard learned companynsel for the parties and perused the record.
Leave granted.
The appellant at that stage approached the High Court.
The learned Single Judge accordingly dismissed the writ petition and declined to issue Mandamus, as prayed for.
