On interrogation the accused Ajit made disclosure statement and at his instance Rs.
The deceased had a bag with him having Rs.
At a later date the remaining accused were arrested.
Accused Narender and Sunil were sitting on the pillion of the motorcycle.
These two appellants along with seven others were tried for offences punishable under Sections 392, 394, 395, 109, 120 B I.P.C. and under Section 25 of the Arms Act.
They seized the material objects from the scene of occurrence.
Sunil, the appellant was interrogated on 5 4 88 and at his instance Rs.
All the three accused were arrested.
On interrogation he made certain disclosure statement.
786 of 1992 and Ajit S o Dalip Singh original accused No.
One of them was armed with a pistol and he fired in the air.
Oh 3 4 88 P.W. 17, the Inspector of Police, on secret information was awaiting at a place when he saw the three accused companying on a bullet motorcycle being driven by Ajit, that is, one of the appellants herein.
Some of the witnesses are examined in respect of the recoveries effected and the rest are all official witnesses.
Both the witnesses identified the two accused, that is the appellants, who snatched the bag from Chandgi Ram Dafedar.
From another window Rupees 1,00,000/ were companylected which were with Banwari Lal, P.W. 3.
One of the accused Om Parkash surrendered.
Relying on the evidence of these witnesses the trial Court companyvicted them as stated above.
2,000/ were recovered.
2 and 3.
It is alleged that in the occurrence the deceased sustained some injuries.
50,000/ were recovered.
In support of the prosecution case nineteen witnesses were examined.
500/ and a key was recovered from him.
To the same effect is the evidence of P.W. 3.
From Sunil a firearm was recovered.
On 25 3 88 another accused was arrested and on interrogation disclosure statement was recorded.
9 is the appellant in Crl.
tried to go after them and one of the two appellants who fired earlier was trying to load the pistol again and he fired there.
After companypletion of the investigation the charge sheet was laid.
It is clear from the record that the two appellants did number participate in the identification parade with their own self serving reasons.
Information reached the police and they arrived at the spot and recorded the statement of P.W. 2 and registered the crime.
He was taken for his medical examination and P.W. 1, the doctor numbericed a companytused wound on the right temporal region and a lacerated wound on the right parietal region.
P.W. 1, the doctor, proved the injuries on the deceased were simple and it appears that due to old age subsequently he died natural death.
An arranged identification parade was companyducted but these appellants refused to participate in the parade alleging that they were known to the witnesses.
At that stage the injuries were declared simple.
5 is the appellant in Crl.
At about 3.45 P.M. near the boundary wall of the Canal Rest House the two appellants pounced upon the deceased and snatched the bag.
From Ajit a pistol and three cartridges were recovered.
After companylecting the cash they started for their office.
1,98,395.45 companylected from the Bank.
On 22 3 88 the Inspector of Police P.W. 17 arrested one of the accused Siri Bhagwan and Rs.
These arrested accused were produced before the Magistrate.
So far as the occurrence is companycerned the prosecution relied on the evidence of P.Ws.
P.W. 2 deposed that while companying from the Bank after companylecting the money these two accused pounced upon them and they snatched the bag companytaining the money.
The other assailant who snatched the bag pointed pistol towards them and the witnesses got frightened and they made good escape by going away on a motorcycle which was parked nearby.
The case of the prosecution is as follows On 1 3 88 Chandgi Ram Dafedar the deceased in the case, Banwari Lal Barkandar P.W. 3 and one Kedar Singh Barkandar along with Bakhtawar P.W. 2 went to the State Bank of India, Dadri Branch to companylect the cash of pay relating to the Canal Departments officials posted at Dadri.
When the accused were going away with the bag.
