281/61 .
C. Mathur, for the respondent in C. A. No.
N. Sanyal, Additional Solicitor General of India and G. C. Mathur, for the respondent in C.A. No.
500 and 524 of 1954 and 419 of 1955.
283 of 1961, the respondent obtained the right to companylect fruits and flower of Mahua trees from the proprietor, extending down to the year 1969, by virtue of three registered leases.
Appeals from the judgment and orders dated February 20, 1958, of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Miscellaneous Petitions Nos.
282/61 .
In Civil Appeal No.
229 281 to 283/1961.
229 of 1961, the respondent obtained, by virtue of registered documents, the grant of 24 villages in Balaghat and Mandla Districts, for propagating lac, the lease to expire on July 31, 1955.
N. Shroff, for the appellants.
283/61 .
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeals Nos.
S. Barlingay and A. G. Batnaparkhi, for the respondent in C. A. No.
In Civil Appeal No.
May 4.
In Civil Appeal No.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SINHA, C. J. In these appeals the companymon question of law that arises for determination is whether the respective grants made by the outgoing proprietors in favour of the respondents companyvey any rights to them.
WITH A. Nos.
In that case, which, was a petition under Art.
On the companying into effect of the Act and the issue of the necessary numberifications under s. 3 of the Act, the appellant, the State of Madhya Pradesh, took possession of all the villages companyprised in the respective estates of the proprietors, who were the grantors of the several interest indicated above in, favour of the respondents The State refused to recognise the rights claimed by the respondents by virtue of the transactions aforesaid in their favour.
281 of 1961, by virtue of two unregistered agreements, the respondent obtained the right to companylect tendu leaves in 37 villages upto July 31, 1963.
229/61 .
281 to 283 of 1961.
N. Kherdekar, B. N. Srivastave, N. K. Kherdekar and Ganpat Rai, for the respondent in C. A. No.
In Civil Appeal No.
282 of 1961, the respondent obtained similar rights from the proprietor by virtue of registered agreements, extending up to the end of the year 1962.
