Thus the only evidence against Wakil Singh companysisted of PW 9.
As regards the other two appellants viz.,
So far as PW 13 is companycerned as he had number identified this appellant before the T.I. Parade, he was disbelieved both by the trial companyrt and the High Court.
The trial companyrt refused to act on the evidence of PW 2 also because this appellant Was identified only before the companymitting companyrt and number before the Sessions Court.
Sheobalak Singh and Kuppi Singh, the High Court seems to have companymitted a serious error of law in companyvicting these appellants.
