The matter was carried in appeal to his Court.
This Court set side both the orders and remitted the matter for reconsideration.
Similarly, the appellant also filed the writ petition.
Writ Petition No.
Subsequently, on a reference under Section 4 K of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, the Labour Court had in the award directed reinstatement of the appellant with 50 of the back wages.
As a result show cause numberice was issued and he was removed from service.
Thus, this appeal by special leave.Both the writ petitions came to have been decided on different dates.
The writ petition filed by the respondent institution had companye up in the first instance where the learned single judge, while maintaining the order of reinstatement, ordered reducing the back wages to 25.
When the writ petition of the appellant had companye up, the learned Judge directed payment of 100 back wages.
8106/86.
This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the learned single Judge of the Allahabad High Court, made on March 29, 1996 in Civil Misc.
After remand, the learned single judge companysidered the matter and restored the order passed by him on the writ petition filed by the respondent Management and dismissed the writ petition of the appellant.
The appellant, while working as Lower Division Clerk, is said to have fabricated the record and misappropriated the funds of the respondent Institution.
Ramaswamy and K.T. Thomas, JJ.
Thereon, the respondent filed the writ petition.
Leave granted.
