Again on 23.1.1997, companyplainants daughter gave a telephonic call to the companyplainant, that if the remaining amount was number arranged within 2/3 days, she would be eliminated.
This demand was met and companyplainant gave Rs.50,000/ and requested for some time so that he will pay the remaining amount after arranging for it.
Complainants wife was operated upon at Ambala for some ailment.
Complainant made a telephonic call to his brother Suresh Pal and his father Rameshwar Dass at Cheeka to reach Ambala.
Thereafter his daughter went to her in laws place in Village Dhanola, District Sangrur Punjab .
He demanded companyour T.V., washing machine, Godrej almirah and a refrigerator.
Investigation was undertaken and on companypletion thereof, chargesheet was filed.
On their arrival from Cheeka, companyplainant along with them left for the house of his daughter at Yamuna Nagar.
Complainant Kewal Krishan along with Mohinder Pal son of Bachan Lal resident of Ambala City came to Yamuna Nagar.
Prosecution version as unfolded during trial is as follows Kewal Krishan PW 4 is the companyplainant.
In support of the appeal learned companynsel for the appellant submitted that there was numberevidence of the appellant having companymitted offences as alleged.
In order to further the accusations fifteen witnesses were examined.
They purchased companyour T.V., washing machine, Godrej almirah and a refrigerator and handed them over to the appellant in his house.
Besides her were lying a gas cylinder, match sticks and halt burnt papers.
Anamika came to see her mother.
This amount was given about a month prior to the death of Anamika.
As accused persons abjured guilt, trial was held.
On reaching there, he saw his daughter lying dead on a double bed.
By the impugned judgment High Court directed acquittal by the companyaccused persons Prem Nath and Parveen Kumar, but upheld the companyviction and sentence of appellant as aforenoted.
On 25.1.1997 at about 9.30 p.m., Anil Kumar PW 3 gave a telephonic call to the companyplainant that Anamika had got burnt by a gas cylinder.
The trial companyrt found the appellants and the companyaccused persons guilty.
Ten to fifteen days thereafter, companyplainants daughter rang them up from Dhanola that she along with her husband were shifting to Yamuna Nagar and the articles demanded should be sent to her at Yamuna Nagar.
About 15 days before her death, Anamika made a telephone call to the companyplainant that her father in law Prem Nath had told her husband Pardeep Kumar that if Anamika did number arrange for the remaining amount, she should be eliminated, he would arrange for everything and perform his second marriage.
Anamika stated that her husband, father in law and brother in law Parveen Kumar were threatening that if she wanted to remain alive, she should get Rs.2 lacs from her father, as they wanted to expand their business at Yamuna Nagar.
On that day, Anamika told the companyplainant that her husband Pardeep Kumar who was running a shop at Yamuna Nagar in the name and style of New Punjab Tractors, wanted to take her to Yamuna Nagar.
Appellant alongwith two others faced trial.
He is a resident of Ambala City.
He is the Director of G.G. Flour Mills.
Complainant Kewal Krishan enquired about her health.
He had four daughters and two sons.
