It was companytended that writ petitioners were honorary teachers appointed by School Management Committee and some of them by Pradhan of Mandal Panchayat on honorarium of Rs.
It was also asserted in the writ petitions that in view of the aforesaid companyditions it is the School Management Committee presided by Mandal Pradhan that had appointed teachers to teach students in Zilla Parishad primary and high schools.
To put in nutshell, their case seems to be that they are all qualified to be as teachers they were appointed at the instance of respective Zilla Parishads in accordance with Government circulars and in accordance with resolutions passed by Zilla Parishads having taken their services for nearly five to eight years, State Government and Zilla Parishads were bound to regularize their services from the date of their initial appointment and were required to pay arrears of salary on par with that of regularly recruited teachers in both primary and high schools.
The State Government rejected their claims by the order dated 27.2.1992.
It was further companytended that the appointments of the teachers were number against the sanctioned posts and at numberpoint of time State Government had approved their appointments.
200 300 per month.
Not being satisfied with and aggrieved by the order of the learned Single Judge, the writ petitioners filed writ appeals before the Division Bench of the High Court.
The writ petitions were resisted on various grounds including that writ petitions were number maintainable.
200 300 per month by School Betterment Committees and in some cases by the Presidents of Mandal Panchayats the appointment orders do number indicate that they were made either by Zilla Parishad or officers of the State Government against any sanctioned post.
In the writ petitions, they pleaded that they were all working as teachers in primary and high schools on honorarium of Rs.
They moved the State Government for regularization of their services in the year 1991.
It was their further case that Government granted post facto approval to all these teachers by its companymunication dated 9.7.1991.
According to them, Zilla Parishads of Dakshina Kannada, Kodagu and Shimoga passed resolutions with certain companyditions as authorized by the Government by its circular dated 15.10.1987 to open new primary and high schools in rural areas.
200 300 per month they were neither appointed by Zilla Parishads number their appointments were approved by the State Government.
Hence, these appeals.
Thereafter they filed writ petitions in the High Court for quashing the said Government order and also for direction to treat them as having been regularly appointed in the service of the respective Zilla Parishads and also to pay the arrears of salary and allowances from the date of their initial appointment till the date of payment.
6547 51/97, 3986 92/99, 4524 25/99, 5690/2000 and 500/99 WITH Civil Appeal No.
J U D G M E N T WITH Civil Appeal Nos.
1047 48 of 2003 Arising out of SLP C Nos.9078 79/99 SHIVARAJ V. PATIL J. Leave granted in special leave petitions.
200 300 per month in the year 1988 89.
7669/99 AND Civil Appeal No.
1049 of 2003 Arising out of SLP C No.
One of the companyditions was that Zilla Parishad will appoint one trained graduate teacher and the remaining teachers shall be appointed by the public.
The appellants in these appeals were appointed as teachers for various schools run by Zilla Parishads after being selected by Betterment Committees on payment of honorarium of Rs.
