A few facts need mention for the disposal of this appeal, which involves a short point.
This case is still pending.
P.C. in the High Court and sought quashing of companyplaint and the order issuing summons of the companyplaint to them.
P.C. Heard Mr. Amit Pawan, learned companynsel for the appellants and Mr. Vinod Diwakar, learned AAG for respondent No.1State.
Appellant No.3 is the mother of Mohammad Pervez and motherinlaw of respondent No.2.
Appellant Nos.1 and 2 are the brothers of Mohammad Pervez and brothersinlaw of respondent No.
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Leave granted.
Respondent No.2 has filed a companyplaint case against the appellants and also against her husbandMohammad Pervez in the Court of ACJM Court No.8, Varanasi companyplaining therein for the companymission of the offences alleged to have been companymitted by the appellants qua respondent No.2 under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 hereinafter referred to as IPC read with Section 3/4 of the DP Act.
This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 06.02.2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Application Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA Date 2019.04.05 No.3514 of 2018 whereby the High Court declined 154740 IST Reason to quash Complaint Case No.3065 of 2016 as well as the summoning order dated 10.03.2017 passed by the ACJM, Court No.8, Varanasi in the aforesaid case.
Respondent No.2 was married to one Mohammad Pervez in the year 2000.
On receipt of the summons of the said companyplaint, the appellants felt aggrieved and they filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for short Cr.
By impugned order, the High Court declined to quash Complaint Case No.3065 of 2016 and also declined to quash the summoning order dated 10.03.2017 passed by the ACJM, Court No.8, Varanasi in the aforesaid case which has given rise to filing of this appeal by way of special leave in this Court by the appellants.
