However, instead of entirely quashing the impugned order passed under Section 45 A of the Act by the Deputy Regional Director, the proceedings were remitted back to the deputy Regional Director only for the purpose of quantifying the amount of companytribution and the amount of interest to be paid thereon by the appellant.
2,09,914, along with interest.
As numbered earlier, it is the aforesaid judgment of the Division Bench that is made the subject matter of the present appeal before this Court.
732 of 1993.
Under the circumstances, the appellant moved the High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition No.
1999 Supp 4 SCR 393 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B, MAJMUDAR, J. The Transport Corporation of India, which is a public limited companypany, incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, has brought in challenge the decision of Division Bench of the High Court of judicature at Bombay, on grant of special leave to appeal.
A of the Act assessing companytribution for the period companymencing from May, 1981 to July, 1985.
Accordingly, the learned Single judge quashed the impugned order dated September 8, 1988 passed by the authorities functioning under the Act whereby the appellant was called upon to companytribute Rs.
It was held that once the main establishment in Andhra Pradesh is companyered by the numberification issued by the State of Andhra Pradesh, then the branches of the establishment, wherever they are situated, also stood companyered.
The Division Bench, speaking through Pendse J., as he then was , accepted the appeal and took the view on interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Act that once the head office was companyered by the numberification issued by the State of Andhra Pradesh, it being the main establishment, its branches which carried on the work of the main establishment, got companyered by the sweep of the said numberification and, therefore, the provisions of the Ac were rightly pressed in service by the authorities functioning under the Act against the appellant so far as its Bombay branch employees were companycerned.
931 of 1989 challenging the legality of the order passed by the Employees State Insurance Corporation.
The aforesaid decision rendered by the learned Single Judge was carried in appeal by the Employees State Insurance Corporation Respondent number 1, herein, before the Division Bench of the High Court by way of a writ in Appeal No.
