The challan was submitted against 16 persons, 13 were companymitted to companyrt of sessions, the remaining three were tried in juvenile companyrt.
The companyrt of sessions while acquitting the 10 accused, on appreciation of evidence, found various material discrepancies in the case of the prosecution and the testimony of the eye witnesses.
It was found that the incident did number take place at the field of Ayub Khan but it took place in the field of accused party.
1,000/ , Jodh Singh was sentenced to 10 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.
Even PW1 was number found reliable and trustworthy to large extent in so far as he implicated accused other than three who were companyvicted.
In the sessions trial 13 accused were put on trial.
125/1987 which had been filed by the state to challenge the acquittal of 10 accused by the companyrt of sessions and allowing criminal appeal No.
19 witnesses were examined by prosecution out of them 10 were said to be the injured eyewitnesses besides another 11 eye witnesses as well.
389/1987 filed by three accused Chandu, Budh Singh Buddhu and Jodh Singh wherein they had challenged their companyviction and sentence by the companyrt of sessions.
Chandu and Budh Singh were directed to undergo life imprisonment besides fine of Rs.
These appeals have been filed by the state challenging the impugned order of the High Court whereby the High Court dismissed criminal appeal No.
It was further found that the accused were number trying to take away the mustard crop of the companyplainant but companyplainant party was trying to take away that crop of accused which resulted in the altercation and the free for all shooting incident.
In these appeals neither serious challenge has been made number on facts it companyld be made to the acquittal of 10 accused by the companyrt of sessions as companyfirmed by the High Court by dismissing criminal appeal No.
She was pregnant at the time of her death as a result of injuries received during the companyrse of the incident in question.
In respect of three companyvicted accused also discrepancies were found in the testimony of PW1 but they were held as number material resulting in the order of their companyviction by the trial companyrt.
The FIR was lodged by PW1 Ayub Khan stating therein that the accused had gone to his field chidiya peer kakhet for cutting mustard crop when he and others found that the accused were putting the crop into the tractor of one Amar Singh, they resented and asked them number to do so which resulted in altercation accused Chandu fired on deceased Dalmod, Amar Singh also fired a shot on Hakim, Jodh Singh fired at Sahid, Budh fired on Abdul and other accused persons inflicted injuries by pharsi and lathi on the members of the companyplainant party.
The aforesaid three accused were companyvicted.
The one who died from the accused side was wife of one of the accused Chandu.
The incident in question took place on 20.1.1984 in the afternoon at about 2.30 p.m. There were injuries on both sides.
125/1987 filed by the state.
Their acquittal was subject matter of criminal appeal No.
125/1987.
Six persons died from the companyplainant side and one from the accused side.
Ten of them were acquitted.
500/ .
