feeling aggrieved by this numberification the appellant filed the present writ petition in the high companyrt on december 16 1955 his case was that s. 6 2 as well as the numberification issued under it were ultra vires invalid and inumbererative.
10720/ l. s. 73 54.2 on march 28/29 1955.
april 18.
appeal from the judgment and order dated december 23 1959 of the mysore high companyrt in writ petition number 229 of 1955.
the appellant then applied for a certificate from the high court both under art.
the appellant owns 6 acres and 30 ghuntas of garden land in village mulbagilu in taluka thirthahalli in the district of shimoga.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 537 of 1960.
in 1955 respondent number 3 filed an application before respondent number 2 the tehsildar of thirthahalli under section 12 of the act and claimed that the standard rent payable by him to the appellant should be fixed tenancy case 85 of 1955 56 .
1 and 2.
respondent number 3 ramappa gowda is his tenant in respect of this land.
17/12 in cash as rent per year.
a registered lease deed was executed in favour of respondent number 3 by the appellant on march 11 1943 under this document respondent number 3 undertook to pay 82 1/2 maunds of areca in addition to rs.
that is how the present appeal has come to this companyrt.
this numberification purported to fix the standard rent for lands of the category to which the appellants land belongs at one third of the produce.
n. sanyal additional solicitor general of india r. gopalakrishnan and p. d. menumber for the respondents number.
gopalakrishnan for respondent number 3 1962.
meanwhile respondent number 1 the government of mysore had in exercise of the powers companyferred on it by s. 6 of the act issued a numberification number r9.
the high companyrt granted him a certificate under art.
s. shukla and e. udayarathnam for the appellant.
