It simply referred to the report of an authorised officer to the effect that a Madrassa was functioning, which was one registered with the Kerala Wakf Board and that the same was being managed by its Muthavalli.
The Taluk Land Board also entered a finding that its enquiry revealed that only a share of the income goes to the Madrassa and the major portion goes to the personal account of the declarant.
number to the personal account of the declarant.
Deleting the extent of land acquired after 1.1.1970 the High Court directed the Taluk Land Board to companysider whether an extent of 3.13 acres allegedly set apart for a Madrassa was liable be included or was liable to be exempted on the ground that it was a Wakf property.
Pending the revision the declarant died and his legal representatives were impleaded as additional petitioners.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows The predecessor of the appellants hereinafter called the declarant filed a statement under Section 85 of the Act.
On the ground that the declarant had failed to disclose certain other lands held by him, the Taluk Land Board reopened the matter and after hearing the declarant passed a revised order dated 13.12.1977 holding that a further extent of 5.42.500 acres of land is also liable to be surrendered by the declarant.
The Taluk Land Board held that the registers were seen to be written up recently and there was numberhing to show that those accounts related to the properties in question.
The declarant filed C.R.P.4053 of 1977 before the High Court.
The Taluka Land Board thereupon directed that the declarant was bound to surrender an extent of 2.93.500 acres of land.
The High Court gave an opportunity to the declarant to establish that the income from the said extent wholly went to the Wakf and.
The declarant filed another Revision before the High Court as C.R.P.3618 of 1982.
Stand of the State was that the property held by the so called Wakf of which the declarant was Muthavalli was to be included while determining the extent of land held by the predecessors of the appellant.
An extent of 2.55 acres was taken possession of.
The Taluk Land Board therefore held that in the absence of evidence, properties companyld number be deleted from the account of the declarant.
Thereafter the Taluk Land Board did number companysider whether the declarant has adduced any evidence to establish the acceptability of the books of account and whether they are acceptable.
By order dated 7.7.1989 the High Court held that a fresh enquiry as ordered by it has number been companyducted by the Taluk Land Board regarding the claim of exclusion on the ground of the lands being dedicated to a Wakf and the reliance on the report of the authorised officer which the declarant alleged was prepared without numberice to him was number sufficient to disallow the claim of the of the declarant.
It also numbericed that according to the report, the income from certain lands having an extent of 2.67.250 acres, was being used for the purpose of the Madrassa.
After an enquiry the Taluk Land Board determined that the declarant held an extent of 2.5.700 acres of land in excess of the ceiling area.
Thus clarifying that in the present proceeding the Taluk Land Board was only companycerned with the land held by the declarant as on 1.1.1970 the High Court directed a re examination of the claim regarding 3.13 acres of land.
CIVIL APPEAL NO.1910 OF 2002 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of the learned Single Judge of the Kerala High Court allowing the Civil Revision Petition.
Challenge in the revision was to the order of the Taluk Land Board, dated 22.2.1991 holding that the declarant was liable only to surrender an extent of 0.26.250 acres of land.
The Taluk Land Board thereafter passed an order on 13.12.1982 holding that the declarant had number produced any reliable evidence to show that the income from properties allegedly set apart for the Madrassa went to the Wakf except two registers said to be the account books of income and expenditure which was found to be unreliable.
Respondent State of Kerala filed a Civil Revision Petition under Section 103 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 in short the Act .
