The trial Court proceeded on the finding that the order of removal is based upon the previous companyduct of the respondent which was number put in issue before he was removed from service.
The respondent filed the Suit No.450/91 Questioning it for a declaration that the order of removal was illegal.
The respondent was removed from service by the proceedings of the General Manager of the appellant on May 26, 1989.
On January 11, 1996, since the respondent had number appeared, the matter was heard ex parte.
That was upheld by the appellate Court.
That order has number been placed on record.
However, the appellant was directed to produce companyy of the order dismissing the respondent from service.
Leave granted.
Thus this appeal is by special leave.
