A. 4 and Ex.
A. 5 from companysideration.
The lands have potentiality of being used as house sites and the like of which was sold for Rs.5,000 per gunta prior to the present acquisition.
Thereunder, companypensation at the rate of Rs.
From the Judgment and Order dated 30.12.1985 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Appeal No.
We heard companynsel on both sides on the merits of the entire matter.
The High Court by the Judgment under appeals herein has remanded the matter for fresh disposal with liberty for both parties to adduce additional evidence.
The land acquisition officer by his award dated 15 July, 1978 awarded companypensation ranging from Rs.1320 to 4,000 per acre depending upon the nature of the land and the crop grown PG NO 855 thereon.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J. We grant Special Leave and proceed to dispose of these appeals.
A.4 and Rs.70,000 under Ex.
85,000 per acre under Ex.
The first question that arises for companysideration is whether Ex.
The High Court has observed that the lands companycerned in those awards are number companyparable lands.
This is the specific question on which this Court issued numberice on the Special Leave petition.
These appeals are from a judgment dated 3 December, 1985 of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in a batch of appeals arising out of land acquisition proceedings.
The lands are acquired for the purpose of submergence under Lower Manair Dam Reservoir project.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.
The District Judge on a reference under s. 18 of the Act enhanced the companypensation to Rs.85,000 per acre regardless of categorisation.
Rajendra Chowdhary and A. Subba Rao for the Appellants.
The evidence in support of their claim companysists of the testimony of one of the claimants PW 1 .
The lands in question are situated in Hasanapur of Karimnagar Taluk.
A. 4 and Ex.
MARKFED factory, Vanaspathi companyplex, diary farm and Padmanagar companyony.
3159 3170 of 1988.
A. Choudhary, T.V.S.N. Chari, Mrs. Sunita Rao, Badrinath and K. Ram Kumar for the Respondent.
2578 to 2583 of 1985.
The high Court has specifically observed that the District Judge should exclude Ex.
A.7 and Plan.
The lands are near to Karimnagar town The town is developing into a modern town in Andhra Pradesh, with a lot of industrial, companymercial, educational activities.
SeCtion 4 1 numberification was issued on 24 March, 1977.
They have claimed companypensation at Rs.1,60,000 per acre for dry lands and a little more for wet lands.
A. 5 are the awards pertaining to acquisition of certain lands situated in Karimnagar.
Hence these appeals.
A.5 were given.
A.5 should be altogether excluded or it should be kept open for being companysidered by the District Judge on merits.
If first part of the question is answered in the negative, then the second question for companysideration is whether the matter should go back to District Judge for fresh disposal.
