It is number possible to accept the plea of any burn injuries on his hands three months later.
The third dying declaration Exh.27 also blamed the appellant for having set the deceased on fire.
The companyduct of the appellant in absconding for approximately three months from the date of the occurrence, till he was taken into custody, was companytrary to numbermal human behavior and belies his claim to innocence.
On the date of the occurrence, the two witnesses were asked by the appellant to go out of the room.
The second dying declaration stated to have been made orally before her relatives Pws 2,3 and 6 blamed the appellant for having set her on fire, with an additional statement of a dowry demand.
Conviction has been erroneously based on the third dying declaration merely because it was made in presence of the Special Judicial Magistrate.
The first dying declaration, Exh.10 was recorded by a police officer at the hospital.
The spot map Exh.19 companycluded that there was numberevidence of any firewood or fire in the kitchen for brewing tea or companyking food.
The deceased died a homicidal death inside the matrimonial home.
PW 8, the Doctor who certified the fitness and was present during the same has also testified.
It was recorded by PW 7, a Special Judicial Magistrate who proved the same.
The appellant closeted himself with the deceased.
Thereafter, the witnesses heard shouts for help and when the door was opened they saw their mother with burn injuries.
Reliance in support of the submission was placed on State of Rajasthan v. Shravan Ram Another, AIR 2013 SC 1890.
PW 1 Vijay and PW 9, both sons of the deceased have companysistently deposed that the appellant was addicted to companysuming liquor and in an inebriated companydition, he would often assault the deceased.
There were three dying declarations at variance with each other.
