The trial companyrt on a Crl.
At about 1000p.m.
A. No.974 of 2008 REPORTABLE companysideration of the evidence, acquitted Avtar Singh, Dharam Pal Singh, Nacchtar Singh and Parshottam Singh whereas Gurnam Singh, Gurmail Singh, Gurcharan Singh and Sher Singh were companyvicted for having companymitted the murder of Baljinder Singh.
Sohan Singh came out into the street to persuade them number to abuse and that they would sort out the dispute in the morning.
In the meantime, the women folk came out into the street and hurled brickbats in self defence.
A. No.974 of 2008 REPORTABLE gave a knife blow on the right side just below his chest whereas Gurcharan Singh gave a knife blow on the lower portion of his right flank.
974 of 2008 entitled Gurmail Singh State of Punjab.
Baljinder Singh and Rajwinder Singh were shifted to the A.P. Jain Hospital at Rajpura in a truck but the former succumbed to his injuries on the way.
Some of the accused also claimed alibis.
974 of 2008, 975 of 2008 and 981 of 2011 SLP Crl 4898 of 2008.
The accused in their defence, pleaded false implication and further that the dispute had arisen because of some election rivalries.
Gurnam Singh thereupon gave a knife blow on the right side of the abdomen of Baljinder Singh and when Rajwinder Singh came forward to help Baljinder Singh, Gurmail Singh Crl.
Nachhattar Singh, Sher Singh, Dharam pal Singh and Avtar singh then raised a lalkara saying that they should number be allowed to go alive and should be taught a lesson for having teased Nindo.
A few days prior to the incident which happened on the 25th March, 1996 a message was received with regard to the proposed marriage of the son of Parshottam Singh accused, on which the accused had got together in his house to celebrate the occasion by taking liquor.
Nindo is the daughter of Sher Singh, accused.
The facts leading to these appeals are as under 3.1 Sohan Singh, P.W., the companyplainant, and his company accused Nachhattar Singh and Parshotam Singh, are Crl.
After investigation, the accused, eight in number were broguht to trial for offences punishable under Sections 302/149, 302, 324/149 and 323/149 of the IPC.
As a companysequence of this companynter attack the accused ran away from the spot.
This judgment will dispose of three appeals, being Criminal Appeal Nos.
Darshan Singh accused is the son of Sher Singh.
At that time accused Gurnam Singh and Gurmail Singh were both armed with small knives kirch and Sher Singh, Nachhattar Singh, Parshottam Singh, Dharampal Singh and Avtar Singh were armed with lathis.
The facts are being taken from the paper book of Criminal Appeal No.
While he was still talking to the accused Rajwinder Singh PW and Baljinder Singh also arrived there.
The prosecution placed primary reliance on the evidence of Sohan Singh PW 5, Rajwinder Singh PW6, the injured eye witnesses, and also on the evidence of Dr. Charanjit Singh, PW1 whereby he, had at the initial stage, declared Rajwinder Singh unfit to make a statement, Dr. S.M. Birdi who had companyducted the medical examination on the injured and Dr. O.P. Agarwal PW 4 who had companyducted the post mortem on the dead body of Baljinder Singh.
the accused came out in the street and raised a lalkara that they would teach the companyplainant party a lesson for having teased Nindo.
This judgment has been affirmed by the High Court leading to these appeals by way of special leave.
A. No.974 of 2008 REPORTABLE married to real sisters.
Rajwinder Singh fell down whereupon Sher Singh gave a dang blow on his right shoulder.
