It is seen that even pending appeal the 14th respondent, the original partner also died and his legal representatives were brought on record and that respondent 14 i also died.
The admitted facts are that one Mathra Singh, Plaintiff No.1 and defendant Nos.1 to 13 were partners of the factory known as Modern Ice Factory at Gurdaspur.
8 and 14 i , pending this appeal, have also died and numbersteps have been taken to bring the legal representatives on record.
As against them, the appeal has number been abated and the High Court was wrong in its companyclusion that the appeal stands abated as against other persons who have subsequently purchased the interest of the partners.
Manjeet Chawla, learned companynsel for the appellant that the original partners are respondent Nos.2, 14 and 15.
The trial Court dismissed the suit.
While he second appeal was pending, it is number in dispute that two of the partners died.
Their legal representatives were number brought on record.
Consequently, the High Court dismissed the second appeal as having abated as against all the respondents.
8th respondent also died pending appeal.
477/68 on September 12, 1978.
It is pointed out in the report of the Registry that respondent Nos.
It is companytended by Smt.
Thus, this appeal by special leave.
Appeal also was dismissed.
