Sushila in the crime.
Sushila punctured wound remains unexplained.
By the impugned order, the High Court found the accused persons innocent and set aside the companyviction and sentence awarded.
Though many points were urged in support of the appeals, we find it unnecessary to go into those because of the casual and summary way of disposal of the two appeals and the reference relating to the death sentence.
The High Court after analyzing the evidence and stand of the accused persons and the prosecution in its judgment running into 23 pages in the paper book to this Court allowed the appeals of the accused persons with the following observations We have carefully scrutinized the evidence on record.
The two accused persons preferred appeals before the High Court and a reference was made relating to death sentence awarded.
Nos.46 47 of 2006 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.1049 1050 OF 2007 Arising out of SLP Crl.
They have implicated Smt.
After the acquittal of Smt.
Accused Sushila was acquitted by the trial Court.
The involvement of Smt.
Since accused Govind Das was awarded death sentence, the matter was referred to the High Court for companyfirmation of the sentence.
Sushila was to reconcile the companyflict in direct and medical evidence.
Since the punctured wound on the body of Lok Nath were of small dimensions, therefore, weapon Barachhi and pointed Sariya was introduced by the witnesses.
These appeals are against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court by which it directed acquittal of the respondents.
It is to be numbered that there were two deceased persons one was Loknath and the other was Naval Kishore.
