From the Award dated 22nd December, 1978 of the 9th Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal in Industrial Case No.
The Tribunal accordingly rejected the reference.
Hence this appeal by special leave.
K. Garg, P.K. Chakravarti and A K. Ganguli for the Appellants.
1 1 37 of 1981 .
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
X 7/74 G.O. No.
The delinquent workman may also be given the assistance of a fellow employee.
B. Pai, S. Chatterjee, Altaf Ahmed and A K Panda for the Respondents.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DESAI, J. In exercise of the power companyferred by Sec.
The employer tried to sustain its action by invoking its powers under Standing Order 32 of the certified Standing Orders of the Hindustan Steel Ltd. S.O. 32 reads as under B Special Procedure in certain cases.
Hindustan Steel Ltd. Employer for short dismissed Manas Kumar Mukherjee Workman for short without holding any inquiry and without giving any opportunity to the workman to question or A companyrect the allegation of misconduct levelled against him and in violation of principles of natural justice.
8231 IR IR IOL 3 K /73.
10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Government of the State of West Bengal as an appropriate Government referred the following dispute to the Ninth Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal for adjudication.
The reference reads as under Whether the termination of services of Shri Manas Kumar Mukherjee is justified ?
