The case of the appellants is that they were number members of the Union with which the settlements dated 14 5 1987 and 13 9 1990 were entered into and, therefore, the said settlements were number binding on them.
1 1 1986 and hence to the arrears of salary in the said post from that date till they were appointed to the said post on 13 10 1990 in terms of the settlement of 13 9 1990.
The employees of divisions other than Personnel and Administration Division had number, therefore, to traverse the hurdle of one more Non Supervisory post such as that of Office Superintendent Non Supervisory in the Personnel and Administration Division.
Hence aggrieved by the companyversion of the post of Office Superintendent Supervisory into that of Office Superintendent Non Supervisory , the appellants approached the High Court.
They companytended that in terms of Dr Binod Kumars report they were entitled to the post of Assistant Personnel Officer w.e.f.
As far as the other divisions were companycerned, there was promotion from the post equivalent to the post of the Assistant Grade I straight to the Supervisory post.
that of Assistant Personnel Officer.
