From the Judgment and Order dated the 12th August, 1976 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Regular First Appeal No.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Petition for Special leave to Appeal Civil No.
After companysidering his further explanation the services of the applicant were terminated by an innocuously worded order dated 11th September, 1969.
L. Sanghi and E. C. Agrawala for the Appellant Petitioner N. Sachthey for Respondents 1 and 3.
Hardev Singh and R. S. Sodhi for Respondent No.
Although the case does number deserve grant of special leave, we propose to dismiss the petition with a statement of the position which may clarify what seems to have troubled the Judges of the High Court.
266/70.
This Court issued numberices to the State of Haryana and other parties and we have heard companynsel for both sides.
3818 of 1976.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by BEG, C.J. The Special Leave Petition before us arises out of a suit in which a point arose which had been referred for decision by a learned Judge of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana to a larger Bench on the ground that it involved an important question of law of some difficulty.
