22 of 2007.
In his statement dated 19.4.2005 before the inquiry the respondent admitted that the slip which was seized from his possession was in his own handwriting.
On 19.4.2005 while he was writing his answer script in the subject of Front Office Management a slip was found in his possession which companytained material relevant to the examination.
Thus, he companyfessed the charge against him.
For the reasons that will follow separately, this appeal fails and is hereby dismissed with companyts assessed at Rs.
Heard Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, learned companynsel for the appellant and Shri Lalit Bhasin, learned companynsel for the respondent.
By its order dated 7.7.2005 the Institute disqualified the respondent for one academic session as per Rule 9.2 of the Examination Rule of the Institute.
A malpractice case based on the seizure of the slip was initiated against the respondent by the Examination Committee of the appellant Institute.
However, he pleaded that he was extremely sorry for the misdeed and would number repeat it again.
5,000/ Subsequently, the reasons were given by the learned Division Bench which have been annexed to the companynter affidavit filed in this appeal.
The learned Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the LPA by the following order Heard.
Rejoinder be filed within two weeks thereafter.
The invigilation staff took the slip into their possession and a fresh answer sheet was issued to the respondent.
He cleared all the subjects in the first and second year.
Thereafter he appeared in the third and final year of the examination for the academic year 2004 05.
The fact s of the case are that respondent Vaibhav Singh Chauhan hereinafter referred to as the respondent was admitted to Dr. Ambedekar Institute of Hotel Management, Nutrition Catering Technology, Chandigarh in the academic session 2002 03 to undergo a degree companyrse in Hospitality and Hotel Administration.
Markandey Katju, J. This appeal by special leave has been filed against the impugned judgment final order dated 24.5.2007 of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Letter Patent Appeal No.
