In the second appeal, the High Court reversed the judgment and decree and dismissed the suit on the main ground that the appellant did number pay sufficient companyrt fee on the date of presenting the plaint and the deficit was number made good for some time thereafter.
He executed a gift deed on February 24, 1969 in favour of the respondents Nos.
A suit was filed for the specific performance of the agreement of sale dated January 25,1969.
The trial Court decreed the suit and the first appellate companyrt companyfirmed the same.
Instead of executing the sale deed in favour of the appellant, the first respondent started disposing of the properties.
2385 of 1974 dated September 26,1979.
9,000/ within the time allowed by the trial companyrt and the suit was decreed.
The companytract was to be executed within a period of one year thereafter.
This appeal by special leave arises against the judgment of the High Court of Allahabad in Second Appeal No.
3,000/ was paid as earnest money.
All the respondents were impleaded and a suit for specific performance was filed by the appellant.
8 and others.
The total companysideration for the companytract was Rs.
12,000/ and a sum of Rs.
2 and 3, who in turn seem to have further alienated the properties in favour of respondent No.
