The ground of detention were duly served on him at the time of his arrest on February 11, 1972.
you and your associates hurled bombs to wards them.
The only submission pressed by Shri Jagmohan, the learned companynsel appearing as amicus curiae in support of the writ petition, in assailing the order of detention is that, according to the return itself, two cases for theft of companyper wires under s. 379, I.P.C. were registered against the petitioner and others at the Asansol Police Station Case number 16 dated 6th January, 1972 and case number 20 dated 12th January, 1972 , but as the witnesses examined under s. 161, Cr.
Burdwan companymitted theft in respect of electric companyper wire about 3000 ft.
Burdwan.
you along with your associates including 1 Teka Bahadur son of Shri Harak Bir Bahadur of Hutton Road, P.S. Asansol Dist.
P.C. were reluctant to depose against petitioner and his associates for fear of danger to their lives, the Investigating Officer submitted as true, his final report suspecting the petitioner and his associates.
The representation made by the petitioner was received by the State Government on March 16, 1972 and companysidered by the said Government on March 22, 1972.
The State Government approved that order on February 21, 1972 and the necessary report submitted to the Central Government the same day.
Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India for a writ in the nature of habeas companypus.
32 of the Constitution is one Mohd.
in length at Hatgarui near Sen Releigh Water Pump, P.S. Asansol, Dist.
307 of 1972.
As a result of this theft, water supply as 9 92 well as electric supply in Sen Releigh Housing Colony, P.S. Asansol, Dist.
The petitioner, as stated by him in the petition for habeas companypus, was produced before and heard in person, by the Advisory Board on April 10, 1972.
in length from the electric poles at C Block, Son Releigh Housing Colony, P.S. Asansol Dist.
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.
Burdwan companymitted theft in respect of electric companyper wire about 1500 ft.
26 of 1971 hereinafter called the Act .
Subrati alias Mohd.
jagmohan Khanna for the petitioner.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DUA, J. The petitioner in these proceedings for a writ in the nature of habeas companypus under Art.
When challenged by the inhabitants of the area.
Burdwan, 2 Shri Ganesh Das, son of Shri Chote Das of Gour Mondal Road, P.S. Asansol, Dist.
Burdwan.
S. Chatterjee for the respondent.
Karim detained in the Burdwan Jail pursuant to the impugned order of detention dated February 9, 1972 made by the District Magistrate, Burdwan in exercise of the powers companyferred on him by sub s. 1 read with sub s. 2 of s. 3 of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act No.
That on 12 1 72 at about 04.00 hrs.
The Board, according to the respondent, gave its decision the same day.
Burdwan 2 Ganesh Das, son of Shri Chote Das of Gour Mondal Road, P.S. Asansol, Dist.
The, State Government companyfined the order of detention on May 5, 1972 and companymunicated its order to the detenu the same day.
The order of detention was for this reason described by Shri Khanna as mala fide and, therefore, liable to be quashed.
Those grounds are That on 6 1 72 at about 03.30 has.
By your act, electric supply was totally disrupted in C Block area, Sen Releigh Housing Estate and its adjoining areas for more than 12 hours causing much inconvenience to the people of the loca lity, The fact of making the order of detention was duly reported to the State Government on February 9, 1972, the date of the order.
you along with your associates including 1 teka Bahadur son of Shri Harak Bir Bahadur of Hutton Road, P.S. Asansol, Dist.
