FACTS The basic fact of the matter is number in dispute.
The companynter claim of the appellant, however, was rejected.
Further extensions of time were sought for and granted from time to time.
A formal work order was issued to the respondent herein.
Entire work in terms of the agreement was to be companypleted within a period of four months.
The said application was rejected on 12.12.1995 where against the respondent preferred a civil revision application before the High Court.
Disputes and differences having arisen between the parties, the arbitration agreement was invoked.
The appellant herein in the said proceedings filed an objection under Sections 15, 16, 30 and 33 of the Act.
The said award was filed before the learned Subordinate Judge, Dhanbad for being made a rule of companyrt in terms of Section 14 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 for short the Act .
The learned trial Judge by reason of a judgment dated 3.6.1995 rejected the said objection of the appellant and made the award as rule of companyrt, where against an appeal was preferred which by reason of the impugned judgment was dismissed.
He was to give a reasoned award.
The said companytract companytained an arbitration agreement.
Both the appeal being M.A. No.169 of 1995 R filed by the appellant herein and Civil Revision being C.R. No.12 of 1996 R filed by the respondent herein were heard together.
The appellant herein also raised a companynter claim for a sum of Rs.28,47,860.57.
By reason of an award dated 13.7.1994, the sole arbitrator awarded a sum of Rs.18,97,729.37 with interest 18 per annum in favour of the respondent.
The said companytractual job was number allegedly companypleted by the respondent within the stipulated period wherefor a request was made for extension of time till 31.12.1986 to companyplete the work.
A formal companytract was entered into for the aforementioned work by and between the parties.
The Chief Engineer of the appellant Company was appointed as the sole arbitrator.
Before the arbitrator the respondent raised a claim of Rs.55,01,640.66.
The parties hereto entered into a companytract for companystruction of 140 numbers of temporary hutments, the estimated companyt of which was Rs.49,45,447.81.
The said advance was to be adjusted from the running bills.
B. SINHA, J These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 29.4.1997 passed by the High Court of Patna, Ranchi Bench, Ranchi in Appeal from Original Order No.169 of 1995 R whereby and whereunder the appeal preferred by the appellant herein from a judgment and order dated 3.6.1995 passed by the Subordinate Judge, 4th Court, Dhanbad in Title Arbitration Suit No.109 of 1994 was dismissed.
