From the Judgment and Order dated 8.9.80 of the Delhi High Court in S.A.O. No.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
Mukul Mudgal for the Appellant.
Rajinder Sachhar and Mrs. J. Wad for the Respondent.
2443 of 1980.
The High Court dismissed the appellants second appeal in limine, and in this situation the present appeal by special leave has been filed.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHARMA, J. This is a tenants appeal against the decree for his eviction from certain disputed premises passed by the Rent Controller, Delhi and companyfirmed in appeal and second appeal.
339 of 1980.
The respondent, the owner of the premises, let it out to the appellant in 1961 as a monthly tenant.
An unregis tered deed of lease was executed on that occasion companytaining the following statement as one of the clauses That they will number assign or underlet or part with the premises hereby demised without the permission in writing of the landlord subject however to this proviso that they shall be entitled to assign or otherwise part with the possession of the said premises or any part thereof to their associate companycerns without such companysent but in any event the lessees shall be liable for the payment of the rent during the term hereby granted.
