In this case the respondent landlady sought eviction of the appellant tenant on the ground that the premises are required for use by her husband who is a dealer in ball bearing and also for demolition of the existing building and erection of a new structure in its place for use by her husband, Both these grounds found favour with the Controller and the order for eviction of the tenant was passed.
107 of 1994.
Section 21 1 h provides for eviction of a tenant on the ground of bona fide requirement of the landlord for occupation by himself or any person for whose benefit the premises are held Section 21 1 j of the Act provides for eviction on the ground of bona fide requirement of the landlord for the immediate purpose of demolishing the building and erecting a new structure in its place.
In the said order the Court companyfirmed the order of the House Rent Controller directing eviction of the tenant under Section 21 1 h and j of the Karnataka Rent Control Act for short the Act .
Leave granted.
The tenant is in appeal against the Judgment order dated 25th June, 1999 of the High Court of Karnataka in HRRP No.
Heard Ms. Lily Thomas, learned Counsel for the appellant and Shri Dayan Krishnan, learned Counsel for the respondent.
