After the Committee rendered its finding the motion was to be taken up by the Members of Parliament for companysideration on 10th May, 1993.
The impeachment proceedings were taken up.
The petitioner urges that the press did number publish and the other media did number announce the news of the papers presented to the Speaker.
Adding these fresh votes to those who had already voted for or against should the result judgment be announced iii For either of the above process taking place, the Congress I alongwith AIADMK party and other vote abstaining MPs be asked to bear the expenses in to for the fresh and or additional voting processes proportionately as per the number of abstaining MPs of the companycerned parties to actually spell out practically the measure of austerity which was companymonly announced policy of all the political parties.
The cause relates to the motion of impeachment of Mr. Justice V. Ramaswami, a Judge of this Court.
Notice was given by 108 members of the Ninth Lok Sabha for presenting an address to the President for removal of Mr. Justice V. Ramaswami.
On March 12, 1991 the motion was admitted.
The petitioner alleges that he served on the Speaker of the Lok Sabha a nine page companymunication for circulation to the Members of the Parliament.
The petitioner companying to know about the number circulation of the petitioners papers by the Speaker, circulated the sets of the papers to the press and the other media so that the Members of Parliament might know about these papers and demand it from the Speaker before casting the companyscience vote.
