it appears that thereafter the original defendants who are the respondents before us were transposed as plaintiffs and the appellants who were originally the plaintiffs were transferred to the category of defendants.the transposed defendants raised an objection that the companyrt hadno jurisdiction to entertain the suit in view of the provisions of part x of the companypanies act 1956.
apopeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated 8 10 1976 of the bombay high companyrt in civil revision number 137/76.
the high companyrt having dismissed the revision petition the present appeal has been filed with special leave granted by this companyrt.
1 and 3 to 6.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 393 of 1977.
the defendants then moved the bombay high court nagpur bench in revision.
naunit lal miss latita kohli and s. g. ghate for respondents number.
the appellants as plaintiffs instituted civil suit number 9 of 1974 in the companyrt of the senior civil judge nagpur for dissolution of the partnership and accounts.the reliefs asked for included a declaration that the firm stood dissolved on and from january 9 1974.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by gupta j. the two appellants and the six respondents were partners of a firm called shivraj fine art litho works.
s. ramamoorthy s. balakrishnan and n. n. ghatate for the appellants.
the trial companyrt rejected the application.
