They succeeded, however in the High Court of Punjab Haryana on the basis of the decision of this Court in Bhagwan Das dead by Lrd.
But before the order of injunction was passed respondents 1 and 2 had filed an application before the Revenue Authorities under Section 9 of the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 hereinafter called the Land Tenures Act for ejectment of the appellants.
It was decreed by the Trial Court on the 20th June, 1967 in respect of a portion of the land, measuring 157 kanals 2 marlas.
The suit was resisted by the vendes respondents on several grounds.
The land belonged to Smt.
The plaintiffs claimed the right of pre emption in respect of the agricultural land in suit in accordance with clause Fourthly of Section 15 1 a of the Pre emption Act.
A learned single Judge of the High Court allowed the second appeal filed by respondents 1 and 2 and dismissed the paintiffs suit.
Brs, v. Chet Ram.
The vendess appeal in the First Appellate Court failed on the 20th April, 1968.
Shanti, respondent No.
We may state a few more facts before numberhing down the points urged on behalf of the appellants.
The appellants were the tenants of the disputed land under her.
The land sold measured 176 kanals 4 marlas.
An order of eviction was passed by the first authority on 225 1967 that is to say, about a month prior to the passing of the decree by the Trial Court.
She sold the land to respondents 1 and 2 on the 21st June, 1965.
In the appellants suit an order of injunction was made on 11 7 1966 restraining the defendants from dispossessing the plaintiffs from any portion of the suit land.
L. Untwalia,J. This appeal by special leave arises out of a suit for pre emption filed by the appellants under Section 15 of the Punjab Pre emption Act, 1913 hereinafter called the pre emption Act.
The suit land is situated in the State of Haryana to which the provisions of the Act aforesaid are still applicable.
