The Division Bench indicated in its impugned order that in identical matters other writ petitions filed at different points of time had been dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy available.
Upon accepting the transfer charges of Rs.2 lacs, CIDCO issued a companyrigendum to the original allotment letter dated 5th February, 2004 and executed a Deed of Lease in favour of the appellants on receipt of the full lease premium of Rs.
on lease in plot No.1 in Sector 9, Panvel West , Navi Mumbai, for a period of 60 years for a premium of Rs.2,12,24,750/ in favour of Mrs. Meera Balkrishna Dhumale and Mrs. Neeta Hemant Patankar jointly.
The original allottees applied for transfer of the said plot to the appellants herein.
Arising out of SLP C No.14300/2006 ALTAMAS KABIR, J. Leave granted.
This appeal is directed against the order passed by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants herein challenging the action of the respondent, City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. for short CIDCO in cancelling the allotment made in favour of the appellants.
The facts as can be garnered from the materials on record, indicate that the CIDCO had issued a letter of allotment of a companymercial plot measuring 1453.75 sq.
2,12,24,750/ .
The appellants filed a writ petition against CIDCO challenging the show cause numberice dated 19th July, 2005, and the order dated 29th March, 2006, terminating the Agreement of Lease and demanding possession of the allotted plot on 13th April, 2006.
