at 1.8.
0.2 and organic chaff, sterm, stipules, etc.
From the Judgment and Order dated 1.5.1979 of the Orissa High Court in Government Appeal No.
323 of 1980.
Had that fact been brought to the numberice of the sanctioning authority under s.20 of the Act, it would number have permitted to prosecute the respond ent, the son of the owner.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
38 of 1977.
Raj Kumar Mehta for the Appellant.
Both the companyrts found as a fact that the adulterated cumin was exposed for sale and PW 1, the Food Inspector, purchased the cumin Jira under the provisions of the Act and on analysis by the Public Analyst it was found that it companytained 9 foreign seeds as against permissible 7.0 inorganic dust, stones, lumps of earth etc.
G. Sambandhan for the Respondent.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAMASWAMY, J. The respoudent was found to have sold adulterated cumin Jira on March 13, 1976 punishable under s.16 1 a i read with s.7 1 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, for short the Act.
