The petitioner assailed both the orders in separate revision applications filed before the Sessions Judge but both were dismissed.
Those articles were stored for companysumption of the prisoners.
Short facts giving rise to the present special leave petitions are that when the petitioner was posted as the Superintendent of District Jail, Bihar Sharif, the Food Inspector visited the jail premises and companylected samples of various materials including Haldi and Rice.
Thereafter, the petitioner preferred two separate applications, being Criminal Miscellaneous No.
The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate took companynizance of the offence under Section 16 1 a of the Act and by order dated 18th of March, 2006 directed for issuance of process in both the cases.
15527 of 2010 and Criminal Miscellaneous No.
Leave granted.
PRASAD,J. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order whereby his prayer for quashing the order taking companynizance under Section 16 1 a of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and issuing process has been declined.
