As the objects of the appellant were number companyfined to one State, it was governed by Multi Unit Co operative Societies Act of 1942 herinafter referred to as the Central Act .
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and decree dated October 22, 1962 of the Kerala High Court in Appeal Suit No.804 of 1969.
An objection to the execution of the decree was raised by the respondent on the ground that the Deputy Registrar of Co operative Societies, Bombay had numberjurisdiction to pass the award and the same companyld number be executed as a decree in the Courts in Kerala.
The award was sought to be executed as a decree in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Kasaragod.
On appeal, the decision of the learned Subordinate Judge was affirmed by the High Court.
This objection was upheld by the Subordinate Judge and he dismissed the execution application.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The appellant made a claim under section 54 of the Bombay Act in respect of a transaction which took place in Mangalore against the respondent who is a resident of Kasaragod, and was a member of the appellant society.
The Head Office of the appellant is in Bombay and it has a branch in Mangalore.
1312 of 1967.
Both Mangalore and Kasaragod were at the relevant time in Madras Presidency.
The respondent did number appear.
The appellant is a Co operative Society registered in Bombay under the Bombay Act.
R. Naik and K. Rajendra Chowdhary, for the appellant.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Khanna, J. This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment of Kerala High Court affirming an appeal, the order of the Lower Court whereby the appellant Banks application for execution of an award made under the Bombay Co operative Societies Act, 1925 hereinafter referred to as the Bombay Act was dismissed.
