12.8.71 28.7.77 23.11.90 8.7.91 R7 in WP Appt.
9.8.71 2.5.77 21.3.90 3.4.91 R7 in WP appt 2 in CA B.L.Grover, Supdt.
The two appellants were promoted as Dy.
before that date.
The four writ petitioners have, therefore, a rightful claim for seniority over Sadhu singh, L.Grover and Sammat singh at the level of Dy.superintendent.
Superintendent were by way of a roster so far as the appellants were companycerned.
Superintendent.
Sagar Mal, Chanan Ram and Baldev Singh who were Dy.
The writ petition was filed by the general candidates Shyam Sunder and others and was allowed by the High Court.
7.4.60 30.4.90 3.4.91 WP3 R4 in CA H.C.Chhabra, Supdt.
All 7 of them were impleaded as respondents 2 to 8 in the writ petition.
Superintendents must have become Superintendents even before Gian Singh i.e. before 11.2.85 and thus writ petitioners general candidates can have numberclaim even against them.
1 in CA Sammat Singh, do 9.8.71 R6 in WP R9 in CA Sadhu Singh, Supdt.
4.11.60 7.1.91 8.7.91 WP4 R5 in CA Respondents in W.P. Reserved candidates Sagar Mal,Dy.
However, so far as the reserved candidates Sadhu Singh and B.L.Grover are companycerned, by the time they were promoted as Superintendents on 3.4.91 and 8.7.91, all the 4 writ petitioners became Dy.
It will be numbericed that when Gian Singh reserved became Superintendent on 11.2.85, numbere of the general candidates writ petitioners reached the level of Dy.
16.11.60 23.1.87 R2 in WP R6 in CA Chanan Ram,Dy.
The promotions from the post of Clerk to Assistant and Assistant to Dy.
Superintendents on 23.6.95 and 23.11.95 respectively while respondents 2 to 5, general candidates who were senior to them as Assistants, were all promoted as Dy.
Now Ms.Kamal Kanta was promoted as Superintendent on 18.3.96 p.58 subject to Chander Pal later decided as 1997 SCC 474 but by that date the respondents 2 to 5 were also promoted as Dy.
Superintendents on 8.2.96.
Superintendent on 6.5.85, 13.3.87, 30.4.90 and 7.1.91.
Writ petitioners 1 to 4 reached the level of Dy.
Supdt.
Thus writ petitioners general candidates can have numberclaim against Gian Singh.
Secy.14.5.65 5.3.90 R3 in WP R7 in CA Baldev Singh, 8.12.59 11.2.91 Deputy Secretary R4 in WP R8 in CA Gian Singh, 15.6.71 30.10.73 17.6.83 11.2.85 7.3.91 Under Secretary R5 in WP Appt.
Obviously, other reserved candidates who were senior to Gian singh viz.
JAGANNADHA RAO,J. Leave granted in special leave petitions.
