When it was questioned the High Court held that since the proceedings were number initiated against the owner before his death, numberprovision was made under the Act to initiate proceedings against the legal representatives, Even amendment brought by s,85 6A would number enable the appellant to proceed against the respondents and accordingly dismissed the revision.
6 SCR 642 The following Order of the Court was delivered The appeals arise from the orders of the single Judge of the Kerala High Court made in CRP No, 2731/82 dated July 14, 1987.
The admitted facts are that Kerala Land Reforms Act 19 4 was enforced w.e.f.
On representation made by the respondents by proceedings dated September 26, 1981, the Board cancelled its earlier order finding that the earlier order was number legal.
The Taluk Land Board passed an order on July 15, 1978 initiating the proceedings under s.85 7 against the respondents.
The Special Tehsildar submitted his report regarding excess land owned by the deceased as on 11.1970 by his proceeding dated April 6, 1978.
January 1, 1970 and by operation thereof the entire excess land stood vested in the State.
Thus this appeal by special leave.
1995 Supp.
