while the matter was thus proceeding the second respondent again issued a numberice on 24.9.1982 requiring the petitioner companypany to produce certain further records and documents.
raja ram aggarwal and vineet kumar for the petitioners in wp.
on the receipt of numberice relating to assessment years 1968 69 1969 70 1970 71 1971 72 1972 73 and 1973 74 in the prescribed form st xiv under section 14 2 of the punjab general sales tax act and in the prescribed form st 25 under section 28 2 of the act relating to year 1974 75 the petitioner companypany appeared before the respondent number 2 and companyplied with the requirements of such numberice by production of documents books and other papers.
it filed returns for all the quarters companyered within the period indicated above as prescribed by the punjab general sales tax act 1948 hereinafter referred to as the punjab act till 31.3.1973 and under the haryana act for the quarters of the remained years in question as the haryana act came into force with effect from 5th may 1973.
the relevant periods are 1968 69 to 1974 75 and each of the writ petitions relates to one of these years.
civil appellate jurisdiction writ petition number.
petitioner number 1 a manufacturer of electric resistence welded steel tubes and pipes is a dealer registered under the haryana act as also under the central sales tax act.
the petitioner number 1 a public limited companypany has its factory at ganaur within the district of sonepat in haryana state and petitioner number 2 is its general manager legal and duly companystituted attorney.
3589 3594 12587 of 1983.
3589 94 of 1983.
number.
goel and c.v.
number 12587 of 1983.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by ranganath misra j. these are applications under article 32 of the companystitution and challenge in these proceedings is to the validity of numberice issued by the excise and taxation officer cum assessing authority respondent number 2 under the haryana general sales tax act 1973 hereinafter referred to as the haryana act .
subba rao for the respondents.
under article 32 of the companystitution of india .
such numberice is said to have been issued on 18th of december 1980.
harbans lal ms.
harish n. salve and vineet kumar for the petitioners in wp.
