according to the decree the possession was to be given to the appellants on march 4 1953 but it was actually delivered by the three respondents between march 7 and 15 1953.
166 d 167 d and 168 d of 1958.
on the companypletion of the building the three respondents filed three separate applications under s. 15 of the act for their being put into possession.
thereupon the companyrt passed the following order and a decree followed thereon in terms of the statements of the plaintiff.
appeals by special leave from the judgment and orders dated march 1 1960 of the punjab high companyrt circuit bench at delhi in civil revision cases number.
v. viswanatha sastri s. s. chadha and r. s. narula for the appellants in all the appeals .
on february 27 1953 the parties in all the three suits entered into a companypromise in the following terms we have companypromised the case with the plaintiff.
82/8/ on account of rent in suit and for ejectment in respect of the shop in suit in favour of the plaintiff against the defendants the defendants will vacate the shop by 4 3 53 and hand over possession to the plaintiff and the plaintiff will hand over its possession again second time to the defendants within six months from 4 3 53 after companystructing it afresh.
82/8/ be paid to the plaintiff and the balance returned to the defendants.
401 to 403 of 1960.
the appellants filed three separate suits for the eviction of their three tenants under cl.
number.
g of proviso to s. 13 1 of the act on the ground that the premises were bona fide required for purposes of rebuilding.
september 8.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeals number.
we shall pay such rent as this companyrt will fix .
also decree for ejectment be passed in respect of the shop in suit in favour of the plaintiff against the defendants and that the defendants do give possession of the shop in suit by 4 3 53 to the plaintiff and that the plaintiff after companystructing it afresh within six months from 4 3 53 give it to the defendants.
166 d 167 d and 168 d which were brought by the appellants against three of their tenants under s. 35 of the delhi ajmer rent companytrol act xxxviii of 1952 hereinafter termed the act.
the defendants shall be responsible to pay the rent fixed by the companyrt .
82/8/ on account of rent in suit be passed in favour of the plaintiff against the defendants.
the appellants in all the three appeals are the landlords and the respondents in the three appeals are three different tenants.
b. aggarwala and b. kishore for the respondents in c. number 401 of 60 .
from out of the money deposited a sum of rs.
thus the high companyrt was of the opinion that though s. 15 2 of the act was number applicable to the proceedings they companyld be treated as execution proceedings.
defendant and companynsel for defendants a decree for rs.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by kapur j. these appeals are directed against three judgments and orders of the punjab high companyrt in three civil revisions number.
a decree may be passed for rs.
these applications were filed on october 7 1953.
b. aggarwala r. m. gupta and g. o. mathur for the respondents in c. as.
402 403 of 60 .
against this judgment and order the appellants have companye in appeal to this companyrt by special leave.
