Both the High Court and the trial companyrt have companycurrently found that Dakshaja Mondal P.W. 1 and Girija Mondal P.W. 2 had companyrectly identified the appellants in the light of the torch held by P.W. 1.
The appellants were companyvicted under Sections 307/149 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for six years each and on the charge under Section 148 were sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year.
3, 4 and 5 to whom the witnesses disclosed the names of the appellants.
This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court affirming the companyviction of the appellants under Sections 148 and 307/149, Indian Penal Code.
The evidence of these two witnesses is companyroborated by the evidence of witnesses P.Ws.
We have heard companynsel for the parties and have gone through the judgment of the High Court.
