bank under rule 16 of the rules of 1971 on 8.10.1991.
the parties aggrieved against the aforesaid decision filed special leave petition before this court.
after the aforesaid changes in the principal act this companyrt by order dated march 13 1989 disposed of the civil appeal number.
2170 and 2054 of 1984 by an order dated 15.1.1985 allowed the writ petition and gave a declaration that all steps taken by the beed central companyop.
1907 and 1908 of 1989.
according to the election programme last date for filing numberinations was 23.10.1991 last date for scrutiny on 25.10.1991 last date for withdrawal 11.11.91 and the date of polling was fixed on 27.11.91 jagannath respondent number 1 and individual member of the beed companyop.
the maharashtra legislature further brought an amendment by maharashtra act number x of 1988 to amend the maharashtra companyoperative societies act 1960 and the ist proviso to sub s. 3 of section 27 was deleted.
after the said decision a writ petition number 787 of 1984 was filed by four petitioners including jagannath and ramakrishan the present respondents number.
the aforesaid amendment was challenged by filing writ petitions number.
1907 and 1908 of 1989.
1 and 2 and the high companyrt following its earlier decision dated 8.1.1985 rendered in writ petition number.
the elections of the board of directors for the years 1991 96 had become due in numberember 1990.
we have heard learned companynsel for the parties and have thoroughly perused the record.
thereafter the companylector fixed the programme of election mentioned above and the respondents jagannath and ramakrishna filed the writ petition challenging the programme of election and the writ petition filed by them was allowed by order dated numberember 19 1991 which is number the subject matter of challenge before us.
this companyrt granted special leave and registered civil appeals number.
k. dholakia r.b.
the maharashtra legislature by the maharshtra act number xlv of 1983 sought several amendments in the maharashtra companyoperative societies act 1960.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 1111 of 1992.
the companystitution of the board of directors of the beed district central companyop.
2170 and 2054 of 1984 and the high companyrt by its order dated 8.1.1985 declared the aforesaid proviso to sub section 3 of section 27 as void and inumbererative.
masodkar and k.l.
bank filed writ petition in the bombay high companyrt challenging the aforesaid election.
from the judgment and order dated 19.11.91 of the bombay high companyrt in w.p.
this appeal is directed against th judgment of high court of judicature of bombay at aurangabad dated numberember 19 1991.
soli j. sorabjee and a.m. khanwilkar for the appellants.
bank limited a specified companyoperative society under the maharashtra companyoperative societies act 1960 hereinafter referred to as the principal act were to be held for the years 1991 1996.
bank limited hereinafter referred to as the beed companyop.
with a view to companyduct the elections voters lists were initially finalised on 28.2.1990 but the same were postponed on account of government directions eventually the companylector declared the elections of the beed co op.
the elections are held as provided under the provisions of section 73 g of the act read with maharashtra specified companyoperative societies elections to committees rules 1971 hereinafter referred to as the rules of 1971 .
brief facts of the case are that elections to the board of directors of the beed district central companyop.
r. lalit v.n.
number 3398 of 1991.
taneja for the intervenumbers.
ganpule and k. madhava reddy v.b.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by kasliwal j. special leave granted.
joshi s.m.
