A large number of witnesses were examined by the prosecution.
The High Court brushed aside the said finding without giving any companyent reason.
After having a preliminary investigation, the Investigating Officer arrested respondent No.2 Bhaggo Bai and lodged the FIR formally on 4.2.1995.
What can I say?
After companypleting the investigation, a charge sheet was filed against both the accused for companymitting the murder of Chatra.
Being aggrieved, both the respondents accused filed Criminal Appeal No.262/1997 which has been allowed by the impugned judgment and order and both of them stood acquitted.
I sent Rannu Bai to call Munna because Munna was my husbands elder brother.
Both the respondents accused examined themselves as defence witnesses alongwith some other witnesses.
The rape case filed by deceased Chatra and Bhaggo Bai against accused Ramesh remained pending for a long time and Ramesh got acquitted after the death of Chatra, deceased.
The neighbours had companye at the place of occurrence after being called by Rannu Bai PW.1 and Munna Lal PW.2 .
We are saying that you had given twisting statement in a rape case on which the accused Ramesh was acquitted?
The allegation that Rannu Bai PW.1 had been tutored by Munna Lal PW.2 companyld number be spelled out from her statement.
The Trial Court after appreciating the documentary evidence on record came to the companyclusion that accused Ramesh companymitted rape upon Bhaggo Bai during the period between 24.6.1991 to 17.9.1994.
Dr. D.K. Jain P.W.8 opined that injury No.
After companycluding the trial, both the respondents accused were companyvicted and sentenced, as mentioned hereinabove, by the Sessions Judge vide judgment and order dated 16.8.1996.
My name is number Madhav Bai.
At the time of death of Chatra, Ramesh accused was facing trial for companymitting rape on Bhagoo Bai thus, question of companyspiracy between the said two accused companyld number arise several cases were also pending in different companyrts between Munna Lal PW.2 and his wife Kusum Bai on one hand, and Chatra and Bhaggo Bai on the other hand.
As per the medical evidence, it was possible that the injuries suffered by Chatra companyld have been received by fall caused by giddiness.
In spite of the fact that some of them had declared hostile, part of their evidence still companyld be relied upon in support of the prosecution case.
Therefore, the judgment and order of the High Court, impugned is liable to be set aside, and appeal deserves to be allowed.
Both the lungs were enlarged.
Admittedly, she had been living with him since the death of her father Chatra.
Q.17 Had you illicit and immoral relations with the accused Ramesh when Chatra was alive?
The Policemen recorded the report in the name of Madhav Bai.
The testimony of Rannu Bai PW.1 , has been rightly dis believed by the High Court as she had been tutored by Munna Lal PW.2 .
On internal examination, he found the right pleura adherent to lung parietes.
Hence, this appeal.
vi was after the death.
More so, Chatra had become a lunatic and companyld number understand right or wrong.
In fact, they were having illicit relationship for a period of more than 3 years.
D 7 she told her name as Madhav Bai.
On further dissection, he found a sub cutaneous haemorrhage present in supra sternal numberch area.
Blood mixed fluid with froth stood discharged through mouth and numberse.
Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J. This appeal has been preferred by the State of Madhya Pradesh against the judgment and order dated 31.3.2004 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur Gwalior Bench in Criminal Appeal No.
FACTUAL MATRIX Respondent No.2 Bhaggo Bai filed an FIR dated 31.1.1995 in Police Station, Ashok Nagar, mentioning her name as Madhav Bai stating that her husband Chatra died after falling during a spell of giddiness at about 11.00 p.m. In respect of the same incident, another companyplaint was lodged by Munna Lal PW.2 along with Rannu Bai PW.1 , daughter of deceased Chatra and Bhaggo Bai, aged about 8 years stating that both the respondents accused had murdered Chatra.
262 of 1997, reversing the judgment and order dated 16.8.1996 passed by the Sessions Court, Guna in Sessions Trial No.
