The writ petition was resisted by the respondents.
was issued by the Government of India reiterating that the scheme relating to temporary status was number on going scheme and the temporary status can be companyferred under the scheme only subject to fulfillment of the companyditions as stipulated in clause 4 of the scheme.
The nature of the engagement was casual seasonal depending upon the availability of the work.
2002 4 SCC 573 the writ petitioners were number entitled to any relief.
A scheme called Casual Labourers Grant of Temporary Status and Regularisation Scheme of Government of India, 1993 in short the Scheme was issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Personnel, PG and Pension, Department of Personnel and Training.
The Scheme came into force with effect from 1.9.1993.
The High Court, however, disposed of the writ petitions holding that they were to be companysidered for regularization.
Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by A learned Single Judge of the Uttranchal High Court in Writ Petition No.939 SB of 2002 dated 16.4.2003 and the order on the review petition dated 28.8.
A review petition was filed taking the stand that in view of this Courts judgment in Union of India and Anr.
The respondents were disengaged as there was numberwork available for them.
2940 2941 OF 2007 Arising out of S.L.P. C Nos.
They filed the writ petition taking the stand that they were entitled to be companytinued in service as they were working up to 3.7.2002.
CIVIL APPEAL NOS.
On 6.6.2002, OM No.40011/6/2002/Estt.
23142 43 of 2005 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
In the writ petition taking the stand that the writ petitioners were number companyered by the scheme of regularization as they did number fulfil the prescribed criteria, they were number entitled to grant of temporary status.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows Respondents filed a writ petition before the High Court claiming that they should be companysidered for regularization and should be paid minimum of pay scale.
The respondents were engaged as casual labourers in the office of the Controller of the Defence Accounts during the period 1989 95.
