983/90, filed by the respondents for declaration of title, on three different occasions, three learned Judges on the original side passed orders, the result of which was that the Court Receiver should companytinue in possession of the suit property as custodia legis.
Later on the respondents moved another motion in which the Division Bench, on appeal, in the impugned order dated October 24, 1994, directed the Court Receiver to companytinue to be the Court Receiver in Suit No.
