Another prayer was also made in the petition but therewith we are numberlonger companycerned as the same was withdrawn at a later stage.
From the Judgment and Order dated 2 8 1973 of the Gujarat High Court in L.P.A. No.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
Appellant in person.
1134 of 1974.
J. Nain and Miss A. Subhashini for the Respondents.
Claiming that the impugned order amounts to an order of transfer within the meaning of article 222 1 of the Constitution the appellant brought a petition under article 226 thereof with the prayer that the Governments of the Union of India and the State of Gujarat be directed to pay him an allowance to which, according to him, he had become entitled under article 222 2 of the Constitution with effect from October, 1963.
The appellant was appointed an Additional Judge of the High Court of Bombay on June 29, 1959.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KOSHAL, J. This appeal by certificate granted under Article 133 1 c of the Constitution of India by the High Court of Gujarat is directed against its judgment dated 2 8 1973 and the sole point requiring decision therein is as to whether an order passed by the President of India under sub section 1 of section 29 of The Bombay Reorganization Act, 1960 hereinafter referred to as the Act and determining that the appellant shall on the 1st day of May 1960 cease to be a Judge of the High Court of Bombay and become a Judge of the High Court of Gujarat is to be regarded as an order of transfer under article 222 1 of the Constitution.
After the Act came into force the President of India passed the said order hereinafter referred to as the impugned order under section 29 1 of the Act in respect of the appellant, who was still an Additional Judge of the High Court of Bombay and 4 other Judges of that Court so that with effect from the 1st of May 1960 the appellant became an Additional Judge of the High Court of Gujarat.
255/71.
