3, however, had been appointed on 13.12.1990.
3, Gopal Sharma, had been appointed by Government Order dated 25.2.91, as Assistant District Government Counsel Criminal in the District of Moradabad, in accordance with the provisions of Section 24 of the Criminal Procedure Code hereinafter referred to as the Code and the Legal Remembrancer Manual hereinafter referred to as the Manual against the substantive vacancies.
Appellant No.
In the State of U.P., the Manual is an authoritative companypilation of the government orders and instructions for the companyduct of legal affairs of the State Government.
3, was up to 13.12.1991.
3, as mentioned in the aforesaid Government Order dated 25.2.1991 was 31.12.1991.
The last date of the tenure of the appellants, other than appellant No.
It is number in dispute that before the expiry of the term aforesaid, the District Judge, Moradabad, by his latter dated 27.12.1991 recommended the names of appellants for extension of their terms.
The tenure of appellant No.
Ultimately, without assigning any reason, the extension recommended by the District Judge was rejected by the State Government, which decision is the subject matter of the companytroversy in the present appeals.
P. Singh, J. The appellants in Civil Appeals Nos.
722 723 of 19 93 had been appointed as Assistant District Government Counsel Criminal to appear in different criminal cases, on behalf of the State, in different Courts in the District of Moradabad.
They filed the companynected Writ Applications before the High Court, against the decision of the State Government, refusing to extend their term for a further period of three years, which were dismissed by the High Court.
