608 of 1982 and Cross Objection No.
He executed various deeds creating certain rights in favour of his sole son Dr. Shivdev Singh Grewal and two daughters, namely, Smt.
Shri Shivdev Singh Grewal and Smt.
Aggrieved, both parties filed appeals and cross objections.
She started residing in the suit property.
Aggrieved, respondent filed RSA Nos.
The appellate companyrt dismissed the appeal filed by the respondent on 22.10.1981.
161/399/74 on 4.10.1974 against her nephew for mandatory injunction seeking his eviction from the suit premises claiming absolute right ownership over the same in view of the provisions of Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 hereinafter referred to as the Act 1956 .
14 C of 1982 by which the High Court has affirmed the judgment of the first appellate companyrt as well as the trial companyrt so far as the nature of the rights of the appellant in the suit property are companycerned.
Facts and circumstances giving rise to these appeals are that One Dr. Hira Singh had acquired a huge property in his life time.
She was maintained by her in laws, thus, her father took pity on her and as she was a destitute, brought her back and created a life interest in her favour in respect of the suit property by executing a Will dated 16.9.1944.
Hence, these appeals.
Dr. Hira Singh died on 11.4.1945.
14 C/1982.
Shri Devender Mohan Verma, learned companynsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, has argued that the appellant had become a widow at a very young age.
257 and 608 of 1982, and appellant filed RSA No.
During the pendency of the said suit, the respondent defendant also filed Suit No.
Her father died in 1945.
The appellant executed a Will dated 28.2.1991 in respect of the suit property creating a trust in the name of her father and appointing Shri Sudarshan Singh Deol and Brig Inderjeet Singh Dhillon as the trustees.
The trial companyrt vide judgment and decree dated 28.4.1978 decided the Suit No.
The appellant died on 15.2.1998 and thus executors of her Will got impleaded.
608/1982 and cross objection bearing No.
80 of 1976, against the appellant plaintiff for permanent injunction restraining her from transferring alienating the suit property.
She further made Codicil dated 25.8.1995.
However, so far as the issue relating to companyversion of the life interest into absolute title was decided against the appellant.
The High Court allowed both the RSAs filed by the respondent and dismissed the claim of the appellant.
On the same day, appeal filed by the appellant was allowed to certain extent.
Dayawant Kaur died leaving behind their children.
Dayawant Kaur and Dr. Shivdev Kaur including the Will dated 16.9.1944, creating certain rights in favour of the appellant.
Dr. Shivdev Kaur claimed certain rights on the basis of the Will dated 16.9.1944, and for the same she filed Suit No.
The respondent defendant companytested the suit denying such a right.
however, she would number be dispossessed from the suit premises and it would be subject to the final decision of the another suit.
Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J These appeals have been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 2.7.2004 passed by the High Court of Punjab Haryana at Chandigarh in Regular Second Appeal No.
257 of 1982 and Regular Second Appeal No.
