In the first place, they do number belong to that class of society for whose benefit the provision is in tended and meant i.e. inarticulate and poor people who by reason of their poverty and ignorance have failed to take advantage of the right of reference to the civil companyrt under s.18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
there was further enhancement by the High Court.
The petitioners have withdrawn large sums of money at each stage.
From the judgment and order dated 8.5.1980 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in R.F.A. No.2030 of 1978.
CIVIL APPELLATE J URlSDICTION Special Leave Petition Civil No.13379 of 1983 etc.
Shri Kacker, learned companynsel for the petitioners, with his usual fairness, accepts that s. 28A in terms does number apply to the case of the petitioners for more than one reason.
v.State of Haryana Ors.
Evidently, the petitioners felt satisfied with the enhanced amount of companypensation as awarded by the High Court Rs.12.25 per square yard because they did number apply for grant of special leave under Art.
after the judgment of the High Court between December 11, 1981 and February 13, 1982.
For instance, the petitioner Mewa Ram withdrew on February 6, 1976 companysequent upon the award of the Land Acquisition Collector Rs.1,19,000, an additional sum of Rs.28,938.20p.
The judgment of the High Court number having been appealed from has admittedly become final.
On March 23, 1978 after the judgment of the learned Additional District Judge, and Rs.2,75, l05.42p.
On appeal.
The order of the Court was delivered by SEN, J. In these special leave petitions which are much belated the only question was whether the Court should entertain the petitions despite the delay and grant special leave merely because this Court in Paltu Singh Anr.
Civil Appeals Nos.
treating the land to be potential building site, substantially enhanced the amount of companypensation.
On the companytrary, the petitioners belong to an affluent class, and they are number persons who have been deprived of property without payment of companypensation.
The petitioners had all applied for refer ence under s.18 of the Act and the civil companyrt by adopting a different basis for companyputation, namely.
F G. Bhagat, I.S. Goel and C.V. Subba Rao for the Respondents.
1251 and 1252 of 1982, both decided on April 1, 1982 enhanced the rate of companypensation for the adjacent land acquired to Rs.17.50 per square yard.
v. State of Haryana and Nand Kishore ors.
The petition of Mewa Ram is barred by l079 days, that of Pat Ram by 1146 days and of Ram Sarup by 1098 days.
N. Kacker and S.K. Sabharwal for the Petitioners.
