Assailing the adjudication, respondent filed a writ petition stating that there was numberfinancial integrity.
The High Court after analyzing the factual position came to hold that there was numberhing in companymon between the two establishments.
It was separately registered under the Factories Act, Central Sales Act 1956, Income Tax Act, 1961 and the Employees State Insurance Act.
Appellants view was that the respondent was numberhing but a department of the aforesaid M s. Continental Exporters.
Challenge was made to the order of learned Single Judge in the Writ Appeal.
The respondent was of the view that it was an extension on the branch of M s Continental Exporters, a proprietorship companycern of one Sampathraj Jain, who was also the Managing Director of the respondent company.
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court dismissing the Writ appeal filed by the appellant.
