858 of 2006.
Brief facts A First Information Report FIR bearing No.
Learned ACMM, vide order dated 03.10.2006, rejected the discharge application and companymitted the case to the Court of Sessions which got registered as Sessions Case No.
2 herein against the companymittal order dated 03.10.2006 passed by the Additional Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ASHA SUNDRIYAL Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 40th Court, Gurgaum, Mumbai Date 2018.04.25 173615 IST Reason in C.C. No.
2 preferred a Revision Application being No.
2 under Sections 342, 324, 323 and 354 of the IPC.
After finishing the party, Respondent No.
1261 of 2007 filed by Respondent No.
1340 of 2007 before the High Court.
The learned Judge discharged Respondent No.
Respondent No.
Aggrieved by the order dated 03.10.2006 and 10.04.2007, Respondent No.
2 herein stating that on the fateful night of 06.09.2003, Respondent No.
On 13.06.2012, charges were framed against Respondent No.
Respondent No.
Aggrieved by the judgment dated 06.05.2013, the appellant has preferred this appeal before this Court.
Aggrieved by the order dated 04.07.2007, the appellant preferred a Criminal Writ Petition being No.
On 25.04.2007, when the said application came up for hearing before a learned single Judge of the High Court, Respondent No.
2 and Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, learned companynsel for the respondent State.
2 and the appellant were in a birthday party along with their friends.
3766 of 2012 before the High Court.
1261 of 2006 before the Court of Sessions.
Being aggrieved by the order dated 03.10.2006, Respondent No.
2 also filed a Misc.
2 withdrew the same with a request that the trial of the case should number be proceeded with till the disposal of the Revision Application before the Sessions Court.
A charge sheet in the case was filed on 30.03.2004 before the Court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 40 th Court, Girgaon, Mumbai under Sections 363, 342, 324, 354, 323 and 506 Part II of the IPC.
215/PW/2005 wherein learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate rejected the application filed by Respondent No.
Vide order dated 04.07.2007, learned Additional Sessions Judge, set aside the order dated 03.10.2006 while allowing the revision application filed by Respondent No.
2 forcibly lifted her up and took her to his house and put her on bed.
2, on the pretext of dropping the appellant to the venue for dinner, with whom she was in relationship earlier, drove her to his home in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai.
2 removed all her clothes and starting beating her using his waist belt and touching her inappropriately on her private parts in order to outrage her modesty.
Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, by order dated 10.04.2007, rejected the Misc.
Appln.
A Discharge Application was preferred by the Respondent No.
being No.
After reaching there, when the appellant refused to companye out of the car, Respondent No.
2 preferred a Criminal Application being No.
Application being No.
244 of 2007 filed by the Respondent No.
Learned single Judge of the High Court, vide order dated 25.04.2007, stayed the proceedings till the disposal of the said revision application.
3766 of 2012 whereby the High Court dismissed the petition filed by Kavita Chandrakant Lakhani the appellant herein against the order dated 04.07.2007 passed by learned Judge, Sessions Court at Greater Bombay in Criminal Revision Appln.
K. Agrawal, J. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 06.05.2013 passed by learned single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Criminal Writ Petition No.
247 of 2003 PS Gamdevi, District Mumbai dated 12.09.2003 was got registered by the appellant herein against Respondent No.
