All the grounds were nagatived, companycurrently, by the Rent Controller and the Appellate authority.
Ordinarily, appellate jurisdiction involves a rehearing, as it were, on law as well as fact and is invoked by an aggrieved person.
On a revision petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act, the High Court allowed the application for eviction on the fast of the grounds, setting aside the companycurrent finding of the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority on that question.
Chinnappa Reddy, J. The appellant is the sub tenant of a part of the building of which the respondent is the tenant.
The appellant carries on the business of dyeing while the respondent carries on business in Handloom Sarees The respondent filed a petition under Section 10 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act, for the eviction of the appellant on the grounds of wilful defaults in payment of rent, companymission of acts of nuisance denial of title and requirement of the premises for the respondents own use and occupation in companynection with a dyeing factory which he proposed to set up and expansion of the existing business.
