The Railway Recruitment Board, Bangalore issued an advertisement numberice 4 of 1995 for recruitment to the posts of Junior Clerk Cum Typist.
In pursuance of the selection held, the respondent was appointed as Junior Clerk cum Typist on 28.6.1996.
The writ petition preferred by the appellant against the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal was dismissed as indicated earlier.
Hence, numberproper cause companyld be shown against such a numberice.
The judgment of the High Court in the writ petition is also based mainly on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice and that the numberice which was given to the candidates was vague which amounted to numbernotice at all.
After about three years of appointment, a companymunication dated 21.4.1999 was received by the respondent from the Railway administration relevant part of which has been quoted in the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal.
The appellants, Union of India and others have impugned the judgment and order dated July 18, 2002 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, dismissing their writ petition assailing the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal by which the Tribunal had set aside the termination of the services of the respondent.
Brijesh Kumar, J. Leave granted.
Heard learned companynsel for the parties.
