Even in the letter subsequently addressed by the Regional Manager of the appellant bank on 22 4 1988 it was stated that Please refer to your letter mentioned above and advise us the reasons for charging higher rate of interest 16 and 17.5 whereas per loans and companyditions settled with the landlord 15 p.a.
1165 of 1993 dated 28 5 1993 dismissing the appeal of the appellant in limine.
The appellant charged interest 16 per annum with quarterly rests thereon.
The respondent is the landlord who obtained loan from the appellant and companystructed a building for the business of the appellant in ground floor of the premises bearing No.
Impugning the liability, the respondent laid the suit and the trial companyrt reduced the rate of interest to 15 p.a.
55 at Tripurari Sadan, Patiala.
As said earlier, the second appeal was dismissed in limine.
This appeal arises against the order of the High Court of Punjab Haryana in Second Appeal No.
Leave granted.
Thus this appeal by special leave.
and also set aside the liability of quarterly rest.
On appeal it was companyfirmed.
