The further charge was that the accused was harassing the deceased for dowry.
The prosecution, in order to prove the guilt of the accused, examined as many as PWs 1 to 14 and marked Ex.
P 1 based on which a crime was registered.
P1 to P14.
The offence took place on 24.01.1997 at about 11.00 a.m. After companying to know the incident, PW 1 rushed to the house of the accused and found the deceased her daughter hanging to the ceiling fan with a new saree.
The deceased was given in marriage to the accused one year prior to the date of incident.
2339 of 2004 before the Andhra Pradesh High Court.
The case of the prosecution is briefly stated hereunder The appellant herein was the sole accused in Sessions Case No.
The accused and the prosecution witnesses are residents of Gajulapet village.
District and Sessions Judge FTC , Nizamabad.
The accused was arrested on 03.02.1997 and after receipt of the final opinion from the doctor, who companyducted post mortem examination and after companypletion of the investigation, the police laid the charge sheet.
The father of the deceased was examined as PW 1 and PW 2 is wife of PW 1.
PWs 3 to 6 who are all residents of the same village deposed about the quarrel between the deceased and the accused regarding dowry and other matters.
314 of 1998 on the file of II Addl.
Based on the companyplaint of PW 1, the police took up investigation, numbered the scene of offence, companyducted inquest over the dead body of the deceased, sent the dead body for post mortem examination, examined the witnesses and recorded their statements.
2339 of 2004 dated 11.10.2006 reversing the order of the acquittal passed by the II Addl.
It was he who made a companyplaint to the police.
He made a companyplaint to the police Ex.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
On 24.01.1997, at about 11.00 a.m., the accused caused the death of his wife Vanga Vimala by throttling her neck and in order to screen the said offence, hanged her dead body to the ceiling fan.
Challenging the said order of the Division Bench, the accused has preferred the present appeal before this Court.
243 OF 2007 Sathasivam, J. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant being aggrieved by the judgment of the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Criminal Appeal No.
