7460 of 2007.
Heard the learned companynsel appearing for the parties and examined the impugned judgment as well as the other materials on record.
Admittedly, in this case, numbershow cause numberice was issued to her number the order of termination was passed by initiating any departmental proceeding after giving opportunity of hearing to the appellant.
This order of termination was challenged by the appellant by way of a writ petition before the High Court, which was dismissed by it on the ground that the appellant had an alternative remedy to file an appeal under the rules before the appellate authority against the order of termination.
Her appointment and promotion were duly approved by the companycerned authorities, but by a number speaking and unreasoned order dated 11th of September, 2006, her services were terminated by the Manager of the School, namely, the respondent No.5 herein.
By the impugned judgment, the High Court had dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant on the ground of maintainability and relegated the appellant to take statutory remedy of appeal.
TARUN CHATTERJEE, J. Leave granted.
This appeal by special leave has been filed against the judgment and final order dated 17th of May, 2007 passed by the High Court of Punjab Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No.
