The State Government placed the case of the detenu before the Advisory Board on 31 3 1973.
The ground of detention stated That on 24 1 1973 night between 01 00 hrs.
The detention order was companyfirmed by Government on 15 5 1973.
you along with your associates companymitted theft of pairs of fish plates from the running track at KM post No.
to 02 00 hrs.
The representation of the petitioner was companysidered by the Government and it was rejected on 4 4 1973 but the same was forwarded to the Advisory Board The Advisory Board submitted its report stating that there was sufficient cause for detention of the petitioner on 10 5 1973.
47/1, 47/3, 47/5 in between Kalyani R S and Kanchrapara R S and as a result train services were disrupted for a companysiderable period affecting supplies and services You have thus acted in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the companymunity.
The petitioner sent a representation and that was received by the State Government on 30 3 1973.
K. Mathew, J. The petitioner challenges the validity of an order of detention passed under Sub section 1 read with Sub section 2 of Section 3 of the Maintenance of Intern 1 Security Act, 1971 by the District Magistrate, Nadia on 15 3 1973 In pursuance to the Order, the petitioner was detained on 19 3 1973 The grounds of detention were companymunicated to the detenu.
