It may be stated here that companyfessional statements were made by all the six accused persons before the Superintendent of Police under Section 15 of the TADA but later on, the accused retracted with companyfessional statements.
Designated Court, Karnal at Kurukshetra in Sessions Trial No.
Kurukshetra and for the said purpose through the appellant Jaswant Kaur they had approached two terrorists Puran Singh and Karnail Singh since deceased on payment of money and the appellants Kashmir Singh and Jaswant Kaur and Kala alias Charanjit Singh and Sukhpal Singh alias Khushpal Singh, in order to execute the said plan companytacted the said two terrorists on 19.6.92.It appears that the appellants Baba Peer Paras Nath and Baldev Nath Chela were charged for an offence under Section 307 read with Section 34 and Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code and the appellants Kashmir Singh and Jaswant Kaur were charged for offence under Section 307 read with section 34 and 109 of the I.P.C. and also offence under Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Prevention Activities Act, 1987 hereinafter referred to as TADA .
637 of 1996 and also with two other accused Kaka alias Charanjit Singh and Sukhpal Singh alias Khushpal Singh.
39/95.
637 OF 1996 Kashmir Singh and Anr.
WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
297/96 namely Baba Peer Paras Nath and Baldev Nath were tried with the appellants Kashmir Singh and Jaswant Kaur in the other Crl.
The appellants in Crl.
The prosecution case in short is that the appellants Baba Peer Paras Nath and Baldev wanted to kill the companyplainant Peer Gobind Nath in order to take companytrol of Panchmukhi Hanuman Temple at Railway Road.
Appeal No.
V. State of Haryana O R D E R Both these appeals are directed against the decision dated 20.2.1996 passed by the learned Additional Judge.
