Aggrieved by the dismissal of his claim, the workman filed Civil Writ Petition No.
Questioning the same, the workman has filed the above appeal by way of special leave.
This happened on 28.01.1992.
158 of 1993.
8774 of 2005 before the High Court of Punjab Haryana at Chandigarh.
When the appellant found that this was number done, he approached the Conciliation Officer appointed by the State Government.
The respondent Board filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court assailing the aforesaid reference order and also praying for quashing the adjudication case pending in the Labour Court.
The Labour Court took up the reference as Adjudication Case No.
However, the Deputy Labour Commissioner went to his rescue as the delay was companydoned and the companyciliation proceedings were revived.
It was in the aforesaid background that the State Government made the reference for adjudication on 29.03.1993.
Applied and interviewed for the same post out of 60 vacancies in the Sunday Tribune dated 14.5.1995.
5 in the writ petition.
Heard Mr. B.S. Mor, learned companynsel for the appellant workman and Mr. Shishpal Laler, learned companynsel for the respondent Management.
By the impugned judgment dated 31.10.2006, the Division Bench of the High Court by holding that the unexplained inordinate delay has rendered the dispute in question as patently stale accepted the award of the Labour Court and dismissed the writ petition.
Though the Industrial Tribunal passed an award granting retrenchment companypensation and certain further other reliefs, the Union was number satisfied with the said award and they filed a writ petition in 1980 before the High Court of Allahabad.
The factual details have number been seriously denied by the Management.
8774 of 2005 wherein the Division Bench of the High Court companyfirmed the award passed by the Labour Court, Ambala and dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant herein for reinstatement with full back wages and other companysequential benefits.
Sathasivam, J. Leave granted.
Section 4 K of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act is almost in tune with Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and also there is numbertime limit fixed for making the reference for a dispute for adjudication.
Representation dated 7.12.94 to the General Manager, IDDC.,
The appellant was arrayed as Respondent No.
Ambala Representation dated 4.1095 to the General Manager, ID.D.C., Ambala Representation dated 16.7.96 to the Manager, HARTON, Chandigarh.
His application for companydoning the delay in initiating companyciliation proceeding was disallowed by the Conciliation Officer.
