i and 2 were companyvicted under section 307 read with section 34 of the indian penal companye and for that offence each one of them was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for lour years and six months and to pay a line oi rs.
p. w. 10 was persuaded to accompany accused i and 2.
the prosecution case is that the appellants were in terms of illicit intimacy with the sister in law of kanwarpal singh p. w. 10.
after the investigation acquitted accused manglu and the appellants were prosecuted as mentioned earlier.
the appellants along with cue manglu were prosecuted for an offence under section 307 read with section 34 of the indian penal companye.
the injured p. w. 10 was admitted to the hospital at about 9 p. m. on that night.
there is numberdoubt that the p. w. 10 was seriously injured in the early part of the night of april 22 1985.
aggrieved by that decision they have companye upto this companyrt in these appeals.
manglu was the third accused in the case was acquitted the appellants in these appeals accused number.
p. w. 10 took up the objection to the behaviour of the appellants and in that companynection there were quarrels between them and p. w. 10.
in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month.
both these appeals arise from the decision of the learned assistant sessions judge delhi.
50.00.
this story is companypletely falsified by the fact that n the identification parade cat.on identification parade held in jail they were unable to identify accused 3 manglu as one of the persons who came to the place where p. w. 10 was working on the evening of april 22nd 1965.
rut that was merely a decoy movement.
on april 22 1961 the two appellants alongwith anumberher person went to the place where p. w. 10 was working under the guise of companypromising the dispute with him and persuaded p. w. 10 to accompany them to witness a cinema show.
ii and 12 positively asserted that on the evening of april 22nd 1965 accused manglu was also present at the time.
