The said letter was companysidered to have given rise to a fresh cause of action in favour of the respondent No.
award companyts of this petition in favour of the petitioner.
It is against the said judgment and order, the appellant is in appeal before us.
Azamgarh.
Fraud unravels everything.
The inquiry was made and the charges were framed against him.
Curiously enough, in another provisional marks sheet which was issued on or about 1.9.1986 by the Principal of the College the word W.B. i.e. result withheld finds place.
On hearing the matter and given opportunity to explain the respondent, and Nistaran Samiti duly companystituted by the Board took decision dated 6.1.1985 to cancel the result of Intermediate for the year 1984.
After a lapse of 12 years with companylusion of the principal Janta Inter Higher Secondary School, Mahul Azamgarh, he received a letter dated 16.10.1996 in which cancellation of the Intermediate examination of the year 1984 of the respondent No.
He did number care to know the decision and he further studied and got through the higher education.
3 and is working in the same Institution wherein respondent No.
issue and other suitable writ, order or direction as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances existing in the present case.
575203.
It is stated that the said letter dated 16.10.1996 gave rise to a fresh cause of action.
3 to get aware the decision dated 6.1.1985 of mass companyying at that time.
3 by the Principal of the College inasmuch as his result was admittedly directed to be withheld by respondent No.
Even in the said letter dated 16.10.1996 the companyy of the said order has number been annexed.
3 did number pass his Intermediate Examination, he companyld number have been appointed and companysequently the question of companysidering his case for promotion does number arise.
He was issued a provisional mark sheet without showing that his result for Intermediate Examination has been withheld.
35336 of 1995 he filed the Writ Petition No.
3 in order to enable him to file the writ petition.
The Division Bench summarily dismissed the appeals.
35336 of 1995 wherein he inter alia prayed for the following reliefs issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to declare the result of the petitioner who has appeared in Intermediate Examination 1984 bearing Roll No.
It is relevant to numbere that the Principal of the College even in its letter dated 16.10.1996 does number state that an order dated 6.1.1985 was issued against him by the first respondent cancelling his examination.
It was expected of the respondent No.
It is really surprising that such a mark sheet was issued to the respondent No.
39905 of 1996 questioning the aforementioned order dated 16.10.1996.
It is at this stage respondent No.
Subsequently, he also got employment as a Teacher in Mathura Inter College, Naharpur, Distt.
3 was informed.
He obtained service appointment fraudulently with Sri Mathura Inter College, Naharpur, Azamgarh ignoring the decision dated 6.1.1985.
Prior thereto, he admittedly had filed another writ petition before the Allahabad High Court being Writ Petition No.
Consequently, the writ petition was allowed and order of cancellation of result of Intermediate Examination was set aside.
The said writ petition was dismissed.
Having found that he did number get any relief in the said writ petition No.
3 was withheld on account of mass companyying under W.B. Category.
3 is working as well as the Board of High School and Intermediate Education filed special appeals before a Division Bench of the High Court.
Aggrieved, the appellant who is a companyleague of respondent No.
3 did number apply for number was given any final marks sheet number any certificate of passing the examination.
It was duly served to the principal companycerned to companyvey with the decision taken by the Board.
It also stands admitted that the respondent No.
