By reason of a numberification dated 3.02.1970, the State of Maharashtra expressed its desire to acquire a large chunk of land situated in 96 villages for the purpose of forming new twin city near Bombay called as New Bombay Project.
Before the Reference Court, the parties adduced their respective evidences.
The Land Acquisition Collector made its award.
m. Re.
By reason of the said numberification, 53 acres of land, i.e., 5300 sq.
754 of 1986 decided on 26.02.1993, the Land Acquisition Collector itself valued the land at the rate of Rs.
Recently, the Bombay High Court by reason of a judgment and order dated 21.06.2007 has granted companypensation at the rate of Rs.
5/ per sq.m.
5 2002 guntas in one case Rs.
5 4260 61 of 19800 sq.
m., i.e., Rs.
By reason of the impugned judgment, whereas the appeal preferred by the appellants had been dismissed, the cross appeals preferred by the State in Civil Appeal Nos.
m. respectively.
m. was justified.
5 2002 4263 of 2002 22490 sq.
10 Rs.
A numberice under Section 9 of the Act was issued pursuant whereto the claimants appellants filed their applications for payment of enhanced companypensation.
4264 4265 of 2002 where the Trial Court awarded companypensation at the rate of Rs.
5 per sq.
4264 4265 of 2002 Dattatraya Krishna Naik since deceased through his proposed Legal Representatives v. The State of Maharashtra , however, companypensation was awarded upon adopting the belting method at the rate of Rs.
Both the parties preferred appeals and cross appeals thereagainst.
He made valuation of the lands in question.
10 per sq.
Aggrieved by and dissatisfied therewith, the appellants filed applications before the Collector for reference in terms of Section 18 of the Act pursuant whereto reference was made to the Court of District Judge in the year 1986.
However, in Civil Appeal Nos.
1,725/ per sq.
4260 4261 of 2002 Ramdas Dattatraya Naik v. The State of Maharashtra and Civil Appeal Nos.
m. Re.
A declaration in terms of Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act for short the Act was made on 21.05.1971.
4259 of 2002 has paid great fees for obtaining companypensation at the rate of Rs.
5 4266 of 2002 13600 sq.m.
Appellants examined one Jeevan Kulkarni PW 2 as an expert witness.
He visited the land on or about 20.06.1987 and prepared a report estimating the value of the land at the rate of Rs.15/ per sq.
m. by reason of the impugned judgment.
m. Re.
60,000/ per acre.
By reason of the award dated 30.01.1988, the Reference Court awarded companypensation at the rate of Rs.
with all other benefits.
m. It was urged that in these views of the matter and keeping in view the fact that the appellant in Civil Appeal No.
4264 4265 of 2002 was allowed holding that companypensation determined at the rate of Rs.
5 4264 65 of 5 acres 2 Re.
The M.I.D.C. pipeline was companystructed in the year 1978.
7/ per sq.
Court 4259 of 2002 5300 sq.
4260 4261 of 2002 and in Civil Appeal Nos.
m. Re.
7 The purpose for acquisition of land was building a new city.
6 and 10 per sq.
In reference cases involved in Civil Appeal Nos.
For the sake of companyvenience, we may hereto below place the relevant details Civil Appeal Area Award Reference High Court No.
m., it was reduced to Rs.
5 4262 of 2002 23300 sq.
m. belonging to the appellants herein and situated in village Wahal in the District of Raigad, Maharashtra was sought to be acquired.
