Thereafter, Contempt Petitioners filed WP No.
This Contempt Petition has been initiated against the respondents alleged Contemnors for deliberate and wilful violation of the order dated 27 10 2017 passed by this Hon.
235 of 2011 before Additional district Judge and the same was allowed vide its order dated 29 6 2013, entitling mandatory injunction and holding that the Contempt Petitioners do get a decree of declaration of title and recovery of the possession in respect of the suit land.
The Contempt Petitioners filed title suit being T.S. No.
21429 w of 2014 before High Court seeking a writ of Mandamus against the State alleging therein that it was impossible to execute the decree passed in Title Appeal No.
In the year 1983, the said Sumohan Chatterjee the father of Contempt Petitioners died.
Let this amount be kept in an interest bearing short term fixed deposit of a Nationalised Bank.
List the matter after two weeks.
Learned.
The Brief facts which are necessary for adjudicating the dispute involved in the present Contempt Petition in a nutshell are as follows The father of Contempt Petitioners Predecessor in interest i.e. Sumohan Chatterjee, since deceased, was the owner of land in question ad measuring 2 Bighas 7 Cottas 1 Chittacks bearing number 5K 333 within the Mouza Kasba, District South 24 Parganas.
List this matter after four weeks.
117 of 2004 stating that they have neither received any numberice of acquisition number has been paid companypensation by the State.
The Contempt Petitioners then filed Title Appeal No.
The respondents were permanently restrained from making any other companystruction on the suit land and directed to vacate the suit land and to give khash possession to the Contempt Petitioners within two months.
235 of 2011 and to recover Possessions because of massive companystruction has taken place in the property by the government and also having transferred same to the Institute of Nuclear Physics.
In the year 1999, the Contempt Petitioners having companye to know that the aforesaid property was acquired by the State, approached the State Authorities, wherein it was declared that the property was acquired by the State and companypensation was duly paid.
Thereafter, matter again came up on 20 07 2018, when this Court inter alia passed the following order.
7,82,77,387/ Rupees Seven Crore Eighty Two Lakh Seventy Seven Thousand Three Hundred and Eighty Seven only in favour of Registrar, Supreme Court of India payable at New Delhi.
The suit was dismissed vide order dated 30 06 2011.
