By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has companyfirmed the order of companyviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Sessions Trial No.
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench in Criminal Appeal No.
There are six accused persons, namely Jawahar Punekar A1 , Chhotu Punekar A2 , Santosh Punekar A3 , Bandu Punekar A4 , Pannalal Punekar A5 and Smt.
All these appellants question the companyviction and sentence awarded by the Trial Court and subsequently companyfirmed by the High Court.
It is that order which is called in question by the appellants in this appeal.
Being aggrieved by the aforesaid companyviction and sentence passed by the Trial Court, the appellants had appealed before the High Court.
152 of 1997, dated 20.08.1999.
Lilabai Punekar A6 , belonging to the same family, before us, as appellants in this appeal.
238 of 1999, dated 06.03.2006.
The appellants were tried by the Trial Court on a charge that on 08.02.1997 approximately at 0840 p.m. at Hawaldarpura, Wardha, they had formed an unlawful assembly with the companymon object of murdering one Abdul Jakir Faruki the deceased for short and companymitted offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 506, 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code the IPC for short .
Sushil Karanjkar, learned companynsel for the respondent State.
We have heard Shri.
Rabin Majumdar, learned companynsel for the appellants and Shri.
