The respondent is ex parte.
5,44,544.45 p. at the rate of HKS.
15, 73, 161/ lent and advanced by the appellant to the respondent.
3459/54 for the recovery of Rs.
6,60,000/ Hong Kong Dollars equivalent to Rs.
5,44,554.45 P. equivalent to 6,60,000 Dollars H.K. The companysent decree provided as follows There will be a decree in favour of the plaintiff for the sura of HKS.
The appellant who was carrying on business under the name and style of C.S. Ling Co., in Hongkong, filed a suit in the Supreme Court of Hongkong and obtained a decree against the respondent on the basis of which he filed a suit in the Calcutta High Court, being O.S. No.
120.20 to Rs.
Jaganmohan Reddy, J. This appeal is by certificate against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court allowing the appeal from an order made on an application for execution at the instance of the dccree holder giving the judgment debtor an opportunity to take appropriate proceedings for execution of some clauses in the decree which were apparently in his favour.
The parties companypromised and a companysent memo was filed in terms of which a decree was passed on 22 2 1961 for Rs.
