Aggrieved the appellant preferred an appeal befoe the Sub Divisional Officer who by order dated 16.11.1987 allowed the appeal and directed restoration of possession to the appellant.
The Tribunal by its order dated 15.6.1988 allowed the revision application and the order of the Sub Divisional Officer was set aside.
However, on 1.3.1972 the Tahsildar dropped the proceedings holding that the landlord was number in possession of land on 31.7.1969.
The appellant preferred an apeal before the Sub Divisional Officer which was allowed and the case was remanded back to the Tahsildar.
The appellant thereafter preferred a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court.
On remand, the Tahsildar again dropped the proceedings.
The respondent landlord thereafter preferred a revision petition before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Pune for short the Tribunal .
Although, the Tahsildar held that appellant was in possession of the land on 15,6.1955.
