2908 of 2006.
The said vehicle was being driven by one Kulbir Singh.
He got the said vehicle insured on 10.11.2003 for one year, i.e., upto 9.11.2004.
However, a companyplaint petition was filed under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum companyplaining deficiency in service for number paying the amount of damages which was companyered by the insurance policy, which the appellant was allegedly bound to pay.
6604/R 91 92 held by Kulbir Singh was number issued by the Licensing Authority, Solan.
Arising out of SLP Civil No.
It met with an accident on 20.04.2004 with a truck.
HR 37A 5521.
1939 of 2007 B. SINHA, J Leave granted.
Whether renewal of a licence granted to drive a motor vehicle which was originally found to be forged would lead to any liability on the part of the insurance companypany is the companye question involved in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 9.10.2006 passed by National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in R.P. No.
Respondent is the owner of the vehicle bearing No.
