The Government issued a letter dated 24th June, 1987 to the Tehsildar clarifying that the land was to be transferred to the actual occupants.
This Writ Petition has been allowed by the impugned Order dated 4th June, 1991.
Pursuant to the Application of the Appellants, on 27th March, 1986, the Government offered the land to the Appellants on payment of certain amounts.
I D/14 B.P. in NIT Faridabad.
As a result of this clarification the Chief Settlement Commissioner, Haryana issued a letter to the Tehsildar to transfer the land to the Appellants.
The Government clarified that a strip of land used by the 1st Respondent as an approach road companyld be transferred to them.
By a Circular Memo dated 28th February, 1984 the Haryana Government decided that Adjacent Land Correctional Area should be transferred to occupants on certain companyditions.
The Government stated that the 1st Respondent was number entitled to get this land transferred to them.
The said Mohan Lal expired on 3rd February, 1977.
The 1st Respondent then filed a Writ Petition before the High Court of Punjab Haryana claiming that as they were the actual occupants the land had to be allotted to them and number to the Appellants.
On companying to learn of this the 1st Respondent made representations claiming that they were the actual occupants and that the land should be allotted to them.
The said Mohan Lal had built 5 shops.
On 4th May 1985, Mohan Lals widow who had become the owner, donated the land to Mohan Lal and shops to the 1st Respondent Sabha.
The Appellants applied to the State Government for allotment to them of the portion of the land, on which the shops stood.
The shops were companystructed on a small portion of land belonging to him, but they also occupied an adjacent strip of land which belonged to Rehabilitation Department, Haryana, Chandigarh.
LITTTTTTJ J U D G M E N T N. VARIAVA, J. These Appeals are against a Judgment dated 23rd July, 1991 by which the Letters Patent Appeal against a Judgment dated 4th June, 1991 was summarily dismissed.
The said Mohan Lal had let out these 5 shops to the Appellants in these two Appeals.
Briefly stated the facts are as follows One Shri Mohan Lal was the owner of one Plot bearing No.
