In the abovementioned background, the appellant lodged a companyplaint with the police praying that action be taken against the respondents.
yards to the appellant herein for an amount of Rs.44,00,000/ .
The respondents are the accused in the abovementioned case.
Application No.34280 of 2011, the defacto companyplainant in case No.1743/IX/2009, arising out of Case Crime No.246 of 2009 on the file of the 1st Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathura, preferred this appeal.
P.C. praying that the criminal proceedings be quashed.
Accordingly, the first respondent approached the appellant.
It is alleged that there was an agreement between the appellant and the companytesting respondents 1 to 3 whereunder the said respondents agreed to sell a plot of land admeasuring 400 sq.
The appellant left the money in the car and went into the house of the respondents.
By the impugned order, the High Court quashed the proceedings in the abovementioned criminal case on the file of the trial Court.
While the appellant and the father of the respondents were discussing, the first respondent went out of the house and returned after a while to inform the appellant that the glass of the vehicle, in which money was kept, was broken and the money was stolen.
The trial Court summoned the accused respondents herein .
Both of them proceeded to the house of the father of the respondents.
The respondents approached the High Court under Section 482 Cr.
When they were about to enter the house, the first respondent insisted that the appellant leave the money in the car itself.
Both of them went to the bank in a car belonging to the first respondent wherein the appellant withdrew an amount of Rs.16,68,000/ .
Chelameswar, J. Leave granted.
Aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 12th September, 2012 in Criminal Misc.
The said application was allowed by the High Court and hence the instant appeal.
On 11.7.2009, the appellant companyplained to the police that the father of the companytesting respondents herein had called the appellant herein on telephone and asked the appellant to make the payment of the balance amount to the first respondent herein.
