From the Judgment and order dated the 18th December, 1981 of the Gauhati High Court in Election Petition No.
11 89 of 1982.
It is argued that the companytents of the said letter does number have the effect of putting an end to the companytract.
After going through the companytents of the letter it is absolutely clear that the companytractor unilaterally put an end to the companytract and informed the Department companycerned accordingly and also he had resigned from the companytractors list of PWD Manipur.
1 wrote a letter on 30.11.1979 to the companycerned Executive Engineer stating that he was closing the said companytract.
1 of 1980.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The last date for filing numberination was 10.12.1979.
Thus after this letter the companytract came to an end by breach and the companytract was numberlonger subsisting.
S Rangarajan, S.K. Nandy and S. Parikh for the Appellant.
I filed his numberination paper he held a subsisting companytract with the Government for widening the PLP road While it is true that there was such a companytract in existence prior to 3011.1979, respondent No.
K Nag for the Respondent.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by FAZAL ALI, J. In this election appeal the only point for determination is whether at the time when respondent No.
