The appellant who was charge sheeted for the offence punishable under sections 302/34 and 307/34 IPC moved an application for releasing him on bail.
Petition was placed before Mr. M.L. Singhal, J., who allowed the same by observing as under The bail appears to have been allowed to Harjeet Singh Seeta only on the feeling that there was only one injury on the head, whereas infact there were three injuries on the head and those injuries have been attributed to Harjeet Singh, Gurbax Singh and Jaspal Singh.
The aforesaid Crl.
It was also pointed out that similarly situated other accused Jaspal Singh was number granted bail.
No.1772 M of 2001 for releasing him on bail before the learned Single Judge of the High Court.
The bail was granted on misconception of facts and hence the misconception order granting bail to the appellant may be set aside.
That application was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge on 26.8.2000.
That application was allowed by Mr. S.S. Nijjar, J. on 2.2.2001 by observing that appellant caused injury to the deceased on the back of the head and the post mortem examination shows that there was only one injury on the head.
Appellant preferred Criminal Misc.
No.10947 M of 2001 for cancellation of bail by pointing out that as per the post mortem examination there were three injuries on the head of the deceased.
Thereafter, informant filed Criminal Misc.
