Anantrao had earlier married one Smt.
From the Judgment and order dated 21/22 4 1982 of the Bombay High Court in Crl.
The appellant lived with the respondent number 1 for a week and there after left the house alleging ill treatment.
475 of 1983.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
She made an application for maintenance in 1976 which was dismissed.
478 of 1980.
Appln.
Lilabai who was alive and the marriage was subsisting in 1974.
Yamunabai was factually married to respondent number 1 Anantrao Shivram Adhav by observance of rites under Hindu Law in June, 1974.
K. Sanghi for the Appellant.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHARMA, J. The point involved in this appeal is whether a Hindu woman who is married after companying into force of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 to a Hindu male having a living lawfully wedded wife can maintain an application for maintenance under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 hereinafter referred to as the Code .
M. Khanwilkar for the Respondents.
The appellant Smt.
