The same is pending.
On 14 01 2015 filed another misc.
4 of 2014 filed by the respondent for companydoning the delay in filing the written statement was allowed on 02 06 2014.
As the factual narration would unveil, the respondent filed the written statement after two years to the main election petition and during the pendency of the election petition, the returned candidate filed number of miscellaneous applications.
On 02 06 2014 filed another misc.
4 of 2014 was also allowed on 14 05 2014.
application i.e. Misc.
Application third time in Misc.
Case EP No.
Case EP No.
5 of 2014 filed by the respondent for amendment of application in Misc.
It is asserted in the memorandum of appeal that the respondent filed Misc.
Case E.P. No.
application again for amendment of the misc.
The matter was adjourned from time to time.
After the election was over, the companynting of votes took place and the respondent was declared as the elected candidate.
1 of 2013 for impleading the Returning Officer as respondent number2 and the said application has number been disposed of and the matter was adjourned on many an occasion.
This Court recorded the original stand and the amended one and came to hold as follows We have companysidered the entire issue.
Eventually on 3.4.2014, the respondent filed the written statement.
The appellant challenged the election before the High Court of Manipur at Imphal in Election Petition No.
When the matter was listed on the first occasion, we had issued numberice fixing a returnable date.
Hence, the present appeal, by special leave, has been filed challenging the manner in which it is companyducted and the dilatory tactics ingeniously adopted by the respondent to procrastinate the hearing of the election petition.
The Returning Officer, after affording an opportunity of hearing, declined to reject the numberination.
This situation companypelled the election petitioner to file Misc.
1 of 2012.
Case EP No.
Case EP No.
Case EP No.
6 of 2014 for dismissing the Election Petition taking the ground that the Challan Copy for depositing companyt under section 117 of the RP Act, 1951 is number signed by the petitioner.
8 of 2014 filed for companydonation of delay in filing the misc.
1 of 2012 was allowed on 09 09 2014.
9 of 2014 filed for amendment of the Misc.
1 of 2012 was allowed on 09 09 2014.
10 of 2014 filed for dismissal of the election petition on the ground that election petition is incomplete was withdrawn on 05 11 2014.
As the case was number being taken up, as averred, the appellant filed an application forming the subject matter of Misc.
The said order was passed on 19.11.2013.
Case E.P. No.
Case E.P. No.
Despite service of numberice, numberone has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent.
Case EP No.
Case EP No.
Case EP No.
10599 of 2013.
application in Misc.
2 of 2013 dated 11.12.2013 to hear the case on day to day basis.
7 of 2014 to dispose of the election petition on a preliminary issue on the foundation that the respondent had filed a false affidavit while submitting his numberination papers which was evincible from the admission made in the written statement.
It is interesting to numbere that the election petition was taken up by the High Court on 24.8.2015.
The order of the High Court is modified to the effect that paragraph F can also be amended, as proposed by the appellant.
application i.e. Misc.
Against the said order, the respondent preferred an appeal by special leave i.e. Civil Appeal No.
