This order was affirmed by a Division Bench of that Court.
In an appeal filed in this Court we refrained from entering into merits as we were of opinion that in view of the finding recorded by the Disciplinary Authority that the action of the respondent did number cause any harm to the bank number he gained anything out of it, the order passed by the High Court quashing the proceedings for procedural errors was well founded.
We were also of opinion that posting of respondent to Hyderabad was number fair.
On 23rd November 1992 the respondent filed another companytempt application in the High Court.
On 7th November 1992 letter was issued posting him as Deputy General Manager State Bank Staff College, Hyderabad.
On 12th November 1992 the Bank filed a Review Petition of our order on which numberice was issued.
When it was listed before us we felt that companysidering the nature of allegations it was number proper for the bank to pursue the matter.
On 28th December 1992 the bank issued numberice to the respondent for companytinuing inquiry proceedings from the stage it was held invalid.
On 29/30th October 1992 the respondent filed companytempt petition in the High Court which was withdrawn on the next day.
On 22nd January 1993 numberice was issued by the High Court in Contempt Application, It is against this order that the special leave petition was filed.
Nor was it proper to deny promotional benefits to him.
The respondent a senior officer in the State Bank of India had filed a petition before the High Court for quashing the order dated 14th November 1987 imposing penalty of reduction in rank from scale VI to the bottom of scale IV.
M. Sahai, J. This appeal is directed against issuance of numberice in Contempt Petition filed by the respondent against Managing Director, State Bank of India, Central Office, Bombay, Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Chandigarh and Managing Director, Central Office, Bombay by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana as an abuse of process of companyrt which has seriously prejudiced the appellants in companyplying with the judgment and orders passed oy this Court and High Court.
