Decision In favour of respondent.3 Cases Referred B. Gautam v. Union of India 1993 199 ITR 530 SC , Shreya Builders v. M.D. Kodnani W. P. No.
1918 of 1993, Shreyas Builders v. M. D. Kodnani and Writ Petition No.
In doing so, the High Court adverted to the decision in C. B. Gautam v. Union of India 1993 199 ITR 530 and also other two decisions in Writ Petition No.
Income Tax Act 1961 s.269UD ORDER The High Court in a proceeding that arose under Chapter XX C of the Income tax Act, 1961, for companypulsory purchase of certain immovable property on being challenged held see that the show cause numberice issued was too vague and did number disclose the reasons thereof number the material companysidered by the appropriate authority in reaching a tentative companyclusion was disclosed and, therefore, the whole proceedings stood vitiated and thereby quashed the said numberice.
1918 of 1993 and Laxman Ganesh Tulshibaughwala v. M.D. Kodnani 2000 242 ITR 320 Bom .
Case Law Analysis Jagdish Electronics India P Ltd. v. Appropriate Authority 2000 15 DTC 315 Bom HC 2000 242 ITR 326 Bom affirmed.
Application Not to current assessment year.
