Govindrao by him and was permitted to inspect records, vouchers, act.
The writ petition came to be hear by Division Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court.
On 2nd June, 1978 the Bank paid Govindrao full Provident Fund which was forwarded along with a letter of the same date.
The writ petitioner did number choose to challenge that appellate order by way of a writ petition.
On 28.9.77 Govindrao informed the Displinary Authority that the Development Officer, Shri Sharda, was primarily responsible for granting of the irrecoverable loans.
On 5th June, 1978 Govindrao accepted the provident Fund amount subject to certain objections and claim of interest.
Nearly four years thereafter, another appeal described as Special Appeal was filed by Govindrao which was again dismissed.
On 3rd October, 1977 the Disciplinary Authority after taking into companysideration the objection filed by Govindrao, passed an order dismissing him from service.
On 18th July, 1978, appeal preferred by Govindrao against the order of dismissal, was dismissed by the Appellate Authority.
The appeal against that order was dismissed on 18th July, 1978.
quashed the order of dismissal.
Nothing happened thereafter for nearly five years.
By a judgment and order dated 21.6.1990 V.D. Gyani and A.G. Qureshi, JJ.
On 18th March, 1977 a chargesheet was served upon him in which it was alleged that loans were granted from his Branch of the Bank in total disregard of the rules regulating grant of such loans which has become irrecoverable and thereby had caused loss to the Bank.
What was described as Special Appeal was again dismissed on 12th May, 1982.
On 6th April, 1987 Govindrao decided to move a writ petition challenging the validity of the order of dismissal passed on 3.10.1977.
but he did number file any reply to the allegations made against him.
The Equity Officer found Govindrao quilty of negligence in the matter of granting of the loans and made his report after wating for the reply from Govindrao for a companysiderable period of time.
It is difficult to see how this writ petition was entertained at all by the High Court.
V.D. Gyani, J., speaking for the Bench, held that the writ petitioner must be deemed to have retired on his due date of retirement i.e. 9th October, 1977 The Bank was directed to pay all the dues, Provident Fund, pension, gratuity to the writ petitioner within three months from the date of the judgment.
SEN,J. Govindaro agent of Ujjain Branch of the State Bank of Indore.
The Bank has companye up in appeal against this judgment.
the date of dismissal was 3rd October, 1977.
