At the relevant time one Shri K.P. Thakur was the Managing Director of the appellant companypany who by an order dated 6.7.89 Annexure D appointed the respondents No.
The respondents challenged the aforesaid order of termination in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Miscellaneous Petition No.
Mehboob Hussain and Liaquat Mohd.
4 and 5, namely.
Soon after their appointment the appellant company numbericed that the aforesaid appointments of respondents No.
1 to 5 were made by the then Managing Director.
1 to 5.
1 to 3, namely, Devendra Kumar Jain.
Shri K.P. Thakur in companytravention of the Government Order dated 1.4.89 Annexure B without the approval of the State Government and therefore.
another Managing Director successor of Shri K.P. Thakur by order dated 31.7.89 terminated the services of the respondents No.
FAIZAN UDDIN, J. Leave granted.
Khilzi as temporary Junior Managers in the appellant company.
The appellant is a Government Company within the meaning of Section 617 of the Companies Act which is companytrolled and owned by the State Government and a subsidiary companypany of M.P. Laghu Udhyog Nigam Limited which is carrying on business activities of development of handicrafts and handloom products.
Dilip Goel and Promod Mishra as temporary Jr. Manager and by subsequent two orders both dated 8.6.89 Annexure E/1 and 2 appointed the respondents No.
3973/83 which was allowed by judgment dated 1.12.93 whereby the order of termination of the respondents was quashed.
