In companysequence the petitioner was companystrained to invoke arbitration proceedings before the companypetent authority The Register in his award dated 9.11.83 recorded a clear finding that the petitioner had companypiled with what all the rules requires him to do and the Society had companymitted bungling in number forwarding the name of the petitioner within the time.
He also deposited the price within time on diverse dates as directed by the Society itself The NOIDA refused allotment of the plot to the petitioner on the sole ground that 1.5.76 was the cut off date and who so ever was a member of the society prior to it would be entitled for the allotment.
Admittedly, the petitioner was found to be one of the eligible persons entitled to be registered as a member of the Coop.
Societies for allotment of the plots in NOIDA.
As the petitioner was enrolled as a member on 8.5.76, he is number eligible for allotment of the plot.
