As per the provisions of the said Act, land which is required for the purpose of housing scheme can be acquired under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
It is true that though the appeal preferred by the appellant before the High Court is the First Appeal, the High Court has dismissed the same without appreciating evidence on record.
As the respondents claimants were number satisfied with the market value fixed, they sought reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act to the Civil Court.
yard and also ordered for payment of statutory benefits.
Aggrieved by the judgment of the Reference Court dated 19.12.1994 passed in L.A.R. No.128 of 1987 Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad has preferred First Appeal No.354 of 1995, before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad.
They are all heard together and being disposed of by this order.
The Reference was made to the companyrt of the District Judge, Bulandshehar and same was numbered as L.A.R. No.128 of 1987.
The Land Acquisition Officer, after companyducting necessary inquiry, has passed Award on 11.10.1984.
The Notification was issued on 29.9.1979 and declaration was issued on 20.12.1980.
The Land Acquisition Officer in his Award fixed the companypensation for the acquired land Rs.29.08 per sq.
Even spot inspection made by S.L.A.O. also revealed that residential and companymercial buildings were in existence near the acquired land.
By the impugned judgment dated 19.01.2010 the appeal filed by the appellant herein was dismissed.
The District Court, on reference made under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 has answered the same by judgment dated 19.12.1994.
The land of the respondents claimants admeasuring 2 13 0 of Signature Not Verified Khasra No.174 and 0 17 0 of Khasra No.175 situated in Tanda, Digitally signed by MADHU BALA Date 2019.03.07 144655 IST Reason Bulandshshar, was acquired under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act,1894 for the purpose of implementation of the housing scheme under the provisions of Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965.
We have heard learned companynsel for the appellant and learned companynsel appearing for the respondents claimants at length.
Being aggrieved, the appellant has preferred this appeal.
Having heard learned companynsel for the parties and we have also perused the order of the Reference Court and impugned judgment of the High Court and other materials placed on record.
The learned companynsel for the appellant, by referring to the impugned judgment has submitted that though the appeal preferred before the High Court is First Appeal, the High Court has dismissed the same by the impugned judgment, without re appreciating the evidence on record.
yard, the Reference Court, fixed the market value for the acquired land at Rs.
Subhash Reddy, J. Leave granted.
For the purpose of disposal we have referred to the facts which arise in the Civil Appeal arising out Special Leave Petition Civil No.14973 of 2010.
All these appeals arise out of the Notification issued under Section 4 1 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on 29.9.1979.
The Reference Court has enhanced the companypensation by fixing market value at Rs.99/ per sq.
