the appellant questioned this appointment by the writ petition out of which this appeal arises before the high companyrt.
joseph respondent number 2 herein as the principal of the ranikhet intermediate college ranikhet which was a minumberity institution having the protection of article 30 of the companystitution in preference to him.
intermediate education act 1921 hereinafter referred to as the act recommended three persons viz.
appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated the 30th march 1979 of the allahabad high companyrt in civil misc.
the high court dismissed the petition.
khyali and the appellant.
writ petition number 417 of 1977 .
the appellant was given the third rank in that recommendation.
in any event the director companyld number have appointed respondent number 2 for the post since his selection had been disapproved earlier by the deputy director.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 2264 of 1979.
the selection companymittee thereafter made a third recommendation.
this appeal by special appeal is filed against the judgment of the high companyrt.
pursuant to the direction of the high companyrt after companysidering the cases of the qualified candidates who had applied for the vacancy in question the director appointed respondent number 2 to the post by his order dated march 8 1977.
the proceedings for the selection of a qualified person to the post in question companymenced in the year 1973.
gupta for the respondent.
on the second occasion the selection companymittee recommended the names of the appellant and respondent number 2 assigning respondent number 2 a higher rank.
shri bindeshwari prasad shri s.c.
both these companytentions were negatived by the high court.
the high companyrt by its judgment dated august 19 1975 allowed his writ petition quashed the selection made by the selection companymittee on the third occasion as being without jurisdiction and having regard to the fact that the post in question was that of the principal directed the director of education to make an appointment in accordance with section 16 f 4 of the act.
the regional deputy director of education did number approve of the said selection.
in the writ petition the appellant had questioned the validity of the appointment of mr.
the appellant preferred a writ petition before the high companyrt questioning the validity of the third selection made by the selection committee.
the matter was again remitted to the selection companymittee.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by venkataramiah j. the appellant who was unsuccessful before the high companyrt of allahabad in a writ petition filed by him under article 226 of the companystitution has filed this appeal by special leave against the judgment of the high court.
k. jain for the appellant.
bishamber lal khanna and s.k.
that selection also was disapproved by the deputy director.
