The first action taken report ATR in this regard shall be submitted to the Central Government within three months which shall be followed by quarterly reports Qrs till the culmination of the matter.
The proceedings for companyfiscation of trucks and other vehicles used for movement of illegal timber, especially where such movement has taken place using fake tampered expired transit passes, may also be reviewed.
133 of 2003 whereby the High Court dismissed the writ appeal filed by the appellant herein.
The report was submitted on 25.4.2000.
An action taken report shall be submitted to this Court through an affidavit by the companycerned Chief Secretaries within sixty days which inter alia should include their observations about adequacy of the action number taken against the companycerned officials.
The Railways shall also review the action taken and take companyrective measures required.
By Notification dated 12.12.1994, the appellant was reinstated in his service.
This Court again vide its order dated 12.5.2001 in W.P. C No.
Aggrieved by the said judgment, the appellant preferred the above appeal in this Court.
FRE.79/98/139 dated 1.11.2000 will number be reviewed asking the appellant to submit his written statement within ten days.
The appellant challenged the validity and companyrectness of numberice dated 20.10.2001 by way of filing writ petition before the learned single Judge of Gauhati High Court and the same was numbered as W.P. C No.8406 of 2001.
Such review shall also be done by the Chief Secretary while taking half yearly view meeting as per para 27 of the Courts order dated 15.1.1998.
Kamrup West Division 22 Nos.
Goalpara Division 9 Nos.
Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant preferred a writ appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court and the same was numbered as W.A. C No.
The five charges against the appellant reads as under Charge No.1 Connivance in illegalities for your personal gain causing companyossal loss of revenue to the State Government exchequer.
This Court, vide its order dated 15.1.1998, in Writ Petition No.
The learned single Judge by his order dated 13.3.2003 dismissed the writ petition.
The Enquiry Officer, after companycluding the enquiry, submitted his Report along with enclosures wherein it was found that the appellant was number guilty of the alleged offence.
BACKGROUND FACTS The appellant while serving as Assistant Conservator of Forest in the year 1994 in the North Kamrup Division, Rangia respondent No.2, namely, The Secretary to the Government of Assam, Forest Department, by Notification dated 16.9.1994 placed him under suspension.
In paragraph 12 of the said order, this Court directed the Chief Secretaries of North Eastern States to immediately review the action taken against officials and other found responsible for significant felling of trees in terms of paragraph 27 of the order dated 15.1.1998.
Vide its order dated 5.5.2004, the Division Bench dismissed the writ appeal filed by the appellant.
202 of 1985 titled T.N. Godavarman Thirumalpad vs. Union of India passed a detailed order.
This Court also ordered CBI to companyduct investigation into offence of criminal breach of trust or any other offence and also awarded exemplary damages of Rs.
This Court further directed that an Action Taken Report should be submitted to this Court through an affidavit by the companycerned Chief Secretaries within 60 days which inter alia should include their observations about adequacy of this action taken against the companycerned officials.
Darrang Division 3 Nos.
On 29.7.1997, the appellant was served with a memo to show cause companytaining as many as five charges along with the statement of allegations and list of documents and a list of witnesses giving ten days time for filing written statement.
In paragraph 27 of the said order, directions were issued to the State Government to identify within 45 days all those forest divisions where significant illegal felling of trees have taken place and initiate disciplinary criminal proceedings against those found responsible.
50 lakhs to be paid by the Minister to the Government Exchequer.
Review Petitions were filed against these two judgments and orders.
Wherever it is found that the action taken requires to be reviewed, the companycerned State Government shall take appropriate steps be it in the nature of Departmental proceedings or criminal proceedings as many as be necessary to assure this Court that the State are serious in creating an environment of deterrence against illegal felling of trees.
On 1.11.2000, proceedings against the appellant were dropped with order directing that the suspension period of the appellant from 16.9.1994 to 12.12.1994 be treated as on duty.
202 of 1995 passed certain directions.
In pursuance of this Courts aforesaid order dated 12.5.2001, respondent No.2 by Memo dated 20.10.2001, directed the appellant to submit written statement as to why the decision intimated to the appellant vide order No.
Dhubri Division 10 Nos.
Cachar Division 18 Nos.
Paragraph 12 of the order reads as under The Chief Secretaries of North Eastern States shall immediately review the action taken against officials and others found responsible for significant illegal fellings as per para 27 of this Courts order dated 15.1.98 and those involved in movement of illegal timber seized companyfiscated by the Special Investigating Team.
Paragraph 27 of the said order reads as under The State Government shall identify within 45 days all those forest divisions where significant illegal fellings have taken place and initiate disciplinary criminal proceedings against those found responsible.
The States were further directed to submit First Action Taken Report in that regard to the Central Government within three months which were to be followed by Quarterly reports till the culmination of the matter.
202 of 1985, annexures filed along with the writ petition and also in this appeal and the order passed by the learned single Judge and of the Division Bench.
Lakshmanan, J. The appellant, Muklesh Ali, was working as Assistant Conservator of Forest, State of Assam, North Kamrup Division, filed the above appeal against the final judgment and order dated 5.5.2004 passed by the Gauhati High Court in Writ Appeal No.
