Theses lands, therefore, companyld number be said to be possessed and held by Respondent number3 on the appointed day and were liable to be excluded from the calculation of ceiling area of the land holding available to Respondent No.3.
The appellant State carried the matter in writ petition before the High Court being aggrieved by the aforesaid decision of the Appellate Authority .
It is this order of the High Court that is on the anvil of scrutiny before us in the present proceedings.
The High Court had answered this question against the appellant State.
Respondent No.3 carried the matter in appeal.
