2/2004.
The appellant in A. No.
The respondent Haroon Yusuf was declared elected.
The facts of the case are that the appellant companytested the election to the Delhi Legislative Assembly in 2003 but lost.
O R D E R CIVIL APPEAL NO.
The question involved in both these appeals is whether the office of Chairperson or Members of the Walf Board is an office of profit so as to disqualify a person from being elected as a member of the Legislative Assembly of NCT of Delhi.
3/2004.
C.A. No.
5828/2006 who was petitioner in Election Petition No.
At the time of the election Haroon Yusuf was also the Chairman of the Delhi Waqf Board.
5828/2006 is directed against the judgment and order dated 22.8.2006 passed by the same learned Single Judge of the High Court in Election Petition No.
The appellant in C.A. No.
3/2004 has stated before the High Court that Election Petitions No.
3/2004.
4981/2006 is directed against the judgment and order dated 22.8.2006 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court in Election Petition No.
2 and 3 of 2004 were almost identical and hence numberevidence was recorded in Election Petition No.
