The petitioner complainant had purchased a Mahindra Pick UP BS II 4WD vehicle and got it insured for an amount of Rs.
Hence, present appeal by special leave by the companyplainant.
After hearing parties on either side and scanning the record of the case meticulously, the District Forum allowed the companyplaint and directed the respondent Company to indemnify the companyplainant to the extent of 75 of 4,30,037/ along with interest at the rate of 9 per annum thereon with effect from the date of filing of the companyplaint.
The State Commission by its companymon order disposed of both the appeals, allowing appeal of the Company and dismissing the companyplaint of the Complainant due to which the appeal preferred by the appellant complainant was dismissed as infructuous.
The vehicle was temporarily registered for one month period, which expired on 11.1.2006.
Aggrieved by the decision of the District Forum, Respondent Company as well as the appellant companyplainant approached State Commission by way of appeal.
Aggrieved by the decision of the State Commission, the appellant preferred revision petition before the National Commission under Section 21 b of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, which also stood dismissed.
4,30,037/ with respondent number1M s. New India Assurance Company Ltd. for the period 12.12.2005 to 11.12.2006.
Y. Eqbal, J. Leave granted.
This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 12.4.2013 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in short, National Commission whereby Revision Petition No.4951 of 2012 of the appellant herein was dismissed upholding the judgment of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Shimla in short, State Commission , which had dismissed the companyplaint and set aside the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Shimla in short, District Forum granting the claim on number standard basis.
The companyplainant lodged FIR and informed about it to the respondent Company, which appointed a surveyor and assessed the loss at Rs.2,60,845/ on repair basis.
The facts of the case lie in a narrow companypass.
However, on 2.2.2006, the vehicle met with an accident and got damaged.
Consequently, the appellant filed a companysumer companyplaint before the District Forum.
