The further case against the Appellant was that he transported three British Nationals in his Maruti Van from Delhi to a village in Saharanpur on the same day and those British Nationals were victims of kidnapping perpetrated by the terrorist organisation.
The case against the Appellant was that he was driving a Maruti van No.
DID 9016 for aiding the companyaccused who was member of a terrorist organisation called Harkat ul Anwar which was then engaged in the attempt to murder members of a police party headed by the Circle Inspector of Police, Doradnagar.
He made a plea that the sentence imposed under the two companynts may be directed to run companycurrently.
The charge under Section 353 I.P.C. was put against him on the allegation that he along with the companyaccused, on 31.10.94 at about 11.00 p.m. used criminal force to deter the aforesaid police personnel from discharging their duties.
Learned Counsel for the Appellant candidly companyceded that the companyviction entered by the TADA Court against the aforesaid two companynts of offences cannot possibly be challenged as it was supported by evidences.
In the second charge Section 14 of the Foreigners Act read with Section 13 thereof was pitted against him.
T. Thomas, J. This is an appeal by right under Section 19 of the Terrorists Disruptive Activities Prevention Act for short TADA .
Appellant was charged under Sections 3 and 4 of TADA besides Sections 353 and 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code along with some other accused.
