The Final Finding was given by the Designated Authority on 29th July, 2003 and, CA SLP C 8540/07contd ultimately, in terms of the said Final Findings, Final Notification came to be issued under Section 9A 1 5 on 1st October, 2003.
In this case, the following question of law arises for determination Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the CESTAT was right in holding that expression like article includes only the article which is the subject matter of investigation after being identified for the purpose of Rule 4 1 b and number on any other like article.
On 31st January, 2002, Initiation Notification was issued under Rule 5 of the Customs Tariff Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury Rules, 1995.
A Preliminary Finding was given on 29th July, 2002 pursuant to which the Designated Authority issued Preliminary Notification on 5th September, 2002.
The effect of the Final Notification was to impose anti dumping duty on different types of Acyclic alcohol.
As can be seen from the afore stated dates, the Preliminary Notification came to be issued on 5th September, 2002.
Leave granted.
