Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated 2 5 73 of the Gauhati High Court in Civil Rule No.
849/ from the respondent companypany Rs.
Hence this appeal.
The High Court allowed the application and quashed the order of the Labour Court.
20/ per month from December, 1969 to March, 1972 and Rs.
K. Ramamurthi, A. K. Ganguly and D. P. Mukherjee for the Appellants.
Niren De, M. K. Banerjee, S. M. Mandel, A. G. Menesses for respondent No.
12/ from March, 1970 to March, 1972.
The facts are in a very narrow companypass and the point involved is short.
The Labour Court allowed their application in part and held that each of the workman was entitled to get Rs.
The claim of the workmen for Rs.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
13/ per month from February, 1971 to March, 1972 was rejected by the Labour Court.
1 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by UNTWALIA, J. This is an appeal by special leave from the judgment and order of the Gauhati High Court dated the 2nd of May, 1973 setting aside the order of the Labour Court, Gauhati dated the 26th July, 1972.
1578 of 1973.
778 of 1972.
The appellants, workmen of the, respondent companypany, filed an application under section 33C 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 hereinafter to be referred to as the Act, in the Labour Court asking it to companypute their wages due from the respondent on the basis of certain settlements said to have been arrived at between them and the management.
778 of 1972 by a writ application.
The management challenged the order of the Labour Court in Civil Rule No,.
It may be stated here that the only dispute between the management and the workmen in the proceeding under section 33C 2 of the Act was whether the employees in the Assam Sector were also entitled to take advantage of the settlement between the companypany and its employees in West Bengal.
