The learned District Judge allowed the appeals and decreed both the suits excepting as regards the mortgage dated January 20, 1878.
26, 1912 is barred by limitation.
138 and 139 of 1964.
Appeals by special leave from the judgments and decrees dated April 1, 1965 of the Punjab High Court in Civil Regular Second Appeals Nos.
Thereafter these appeals were brought after obtaining special leave from this Court.
334 of 1961 on the file of the same judge.
That part of the plaintiffs case was number pressed before us.
The respondents in both these appeals claim to represent the interest of the mortgagors.
The Letters Patent Appeals filed by the appellants were summarily dismissed.
1250 of 1966 arises from Suit No.
1251 of 1966 arises from Suit No.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeals Nos.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Hegde J. The appellants in these appeals are the representatives of the mortgagees of the suit properties.
1250 and 1251 of 1966.
280 of 1961 in the companyrt of Senior Sub Judge, Rohtak and Civil Appeal No.
1 that Kura, the person from whom the plaintiffs claim to have purchased the rights of the mortgagors was incapable of entering into a companytract as he was insane.
1 to 7 and 9 in both the appeals .
Both the suits were suits for redemption.
Hence the sale deeds executed by him are void and 2 the claim for redemption in respect of the various mortgages sought to be redeemed excepting the one executed on April.
Civil Appeal No.
Naunit Lal, for the respondents Nos.
L. Gosain and Janardan Sharma, for the appellants in both the appeals .
