Aggrieved against that order an appeal was preferred by the incumbent and the Appellate Authority companyfirmed the order of the District Level Committee dated 29.4.2002.
The learned Single Judge, after companysidering the Governments Order G.O.Ms.
18114 and 18115 of 2002 passed by the learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court whereby the learned Single Judge of the High Court allowed the writ petitions and quashed the order of termination as well as the order of State Level Caste Scrutiny Committee.
This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 27th September, 2004 in Writ Petition Nos.
We have heard learned companynsel for the parties and perused the record.
A companyplaint was received and the matter was referred by the Corporation Appellant herein to the 2 Tehsildar and the Tehsildar in turn referred it to the District Vigilance Committee and the District Vigilance Committee after companysidering the matter came to the companyclusion that the petitioner cannot be companysidered to be a scheduled caste by Order dated 19th July, 2000.
But after the companyplaint was received and the matter was referred to the District Vigilance Committee as well as to the State Level Committee whereby they cancelled the certificate obtained by the incumbent and her services were terminated.
Hindu Gowda but at the time when she applied for service, she wanted to adopt the caste of 3 her mother i.e. Hindu Adi Dravida which is a scheduled caste companymunity and on that basis she secured the appointment.
Consequently, the appellant herein terminated the services of the respondent by order dated 21.5.2002.
In the present case, the petitioner respondent herein when she was admitted in the school, adopted the caste of her father viz.
Therefore, the respondent herein was driven to file a writ petition challenging the order dated 25th May, 2002 as well as the order passed by the District Vigilance Committee and by the State Level Committee cancelling the certificate.
We have heard learned companynsel for the parties.
Hence the appellant is in appeal against the aforesaid order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 27th September, 2004.
The brief facts which are necessary for the disposal of this appeal are that the petitioner respondent herein was working as a Stenographer in the N.G.C. She secured the appointment on the basis of the schedule caste certificate issued by the Tehsildar dated 3.7.1979.
