The police investigated and filed a report stating that numberoffence, as alleged, has been made out.
The said Vimla Devi filed a protest petition.
The appellant made an application for recalling the said order.
The appellant filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.
After hearing the protest petition, learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharanpur made an order on 31.8.1998 summoning the petitioner to face the charges.
P.C. before the Allahabad High Court challenging the orders dated 31.8.1998 and 2.
The said order is challenged in this appeal filed by special leave.
The High Court dismissed the petition by order dated 21.8.2000 holding that the petition was premature and the appellant companyld raise all companytentions at the appropriate stage.
The same was rejected by order dated 11.7.2000.
When the appellant was serving as Superintending Engineer in U.P. Electricity Board, one Vimla Devi filed a companyplaint on 2.2.1998, alleging that she had been engaged by the appellant as a maid servant a few days earlier, that on 1.2.1998, the appellant gave her some tablet which made her unconscious and when she regained companysciousness she found that she had numberclothes and that she was raped when she was unconscious.
2 11.7.2000.
