He referred the matter to a Division Bench which in its turn referred the case for decision to a Full Bench.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated August 8, 1963 of the Punjab High Court, Circuit Bench at Delhi in Civil Revision No.
Although the Full Bench discussed the matter it did number reach any companyclusion in the case, because it felt that whether the application under s. 14 1 of the Arbitration Act had been made within 90 days or number, was a question of fact which has to be decided by the learned Single Judge, and as the learned Single Judge had number gone into that question, the matter had to go back to him.
Originally the revision application went before a learned Single Judge of the High Court.
A revision application was unsuccessfully made before the High Court and it is the order on the revision application which is the subject of appeal before us.
The Full Bench gave its opinion on November 17, 1961.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
330 D of 1954.
2532 of 1966.
It is number necessary to give the details of this companytract, because the matter was referred to arbitration under an arbitration clause included in the agreement between the parties.
By ,m agreement dated April 28, 1948 the appellant companypany entered into a companytract with the Chief Director of Purchase Food acting on behalf of the Government of India.
A. Seyid Muhammad and S.P. Nayar, for the respondent.
P. Maheshwari and S.M. Jain, for the appellant.
The award was made and signed on April 26, 1950.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Hidayatullah, C.J. This is an appeal against a judgment and order of the Circuit Bench of the Punjab High Court at Delhi Single Judge in a matter arising under the Arbitration Act.
