Of these accused, four approached the Bombay High Court by way of filing two criminal misc.
1 came to know about the film sometime on 12.10.2011.
1295 of 2011 and 1296 of 2011 passed by the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court refusing to quash the companyplaint and the process issued under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 hereinafter referred as the Copyright Act read with Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 hereinafter referred as IPC .
1 Shyam Vithalrao Devkatta, filed a companyplaint being Criminal Case No.
There is numberdecision on the various issues raised by the appellants, hence these appeals.
The respondent No.
Upon due verification process was issued by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate against all except the fifth accused.
Application No.
A. BOBDE, J. These two Criminal Appeals are preferred by the accused against the judgment and order dated 22.3.2012 in Criminal Misc.
