two others g. s. tripathi and kamla kant yadav wrote out their statements in their own hand and handed over the same to gajai singh.
gajai singh sub inspector railway protection force inquired into the case under section 8 1 of the act during the companyrse of which he recorded the statements of three persons rakshak indra deo yadav rakshak jagannath pandey and r. k. nandi.
on april 2 1968 he was found in possession of a steel rod and two pieces of moulded brass shells belonging to the railway.
appeal by special leave from the judgment order dated the 8th february 1971 of the allahabad high companyrt in crl.
p. rana for the appellant.
criminal appellate jurisdiction cirminal appeal number 156 of 1972.
the statements were read over to these persons and their signatures were obtained thereon.
after the preparation of a recovery memo the respondent was forwarded to the railway protection force post where a case was registered against him under section 3 a of the act.
revisional application number 1995 of 1969.
uma dutta for the respondent.
the respondent durga prasad was working as a turner in the railway workshop at gorakhpur.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by chandrachud j. this appeal by special leave raises questions regarding the interpretation of the provisions of the railway property unlawful possession act xxix of 1966.
the respondent pleaded number guilty but the learned special railway magistrate first class gorakhpur companyvicted him under section 3 a of the act and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for fifteen months.
that judgment was confirmed in appeal by the learned civil and sessions judge gorakhpur.
