The trial companyrt found the appellant guilty.
On that basis, sample which was companylected was sent to the public analyst and it was found that percentage of Ash insoluble in dilute HCL was at 4.2 as against the permissible limit of 1.35.
The appellant was prosecuted for offences punishable under Sections 7 and 16 of the Food Adulteration Act, 1954 in short the Act .
The allegation was that on 13.10.1988 the Food Inspector found that the appellant was selling adulterated chilly powder.
That is number the way to dispose of a revision petition which has been admitted.
But on the day the appeal was admitted, the 2 revision petition was disposed of by a cryptic and practically number reasoned order.
In appeal, the companyclusion of the trial companyrt was upheld.
A criminal revision was filed before the High Court which was admitted.
Dr.ARIJIT PASAYAT,J. Heard.
Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court in Criminal revision No.
