That your job did number involve companytact with the public indications and your intellectual honesty and innovative opaity are average.
The respondent made representation against the adverse remarks but the same was rejected by the order dated 6.1.1986.
The respondent, thereafter, made a memorial to the President of India against the adverse remarks, as a result of which the adverse remarks as companytained in Item Nos.
Your devotion to duty was insufficient.
From the Judgment and Order dated 27.7.1987 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Delhi in Regn.
The Tribunal by its order dated 27.7.1987 quashed the Government Order as companytained in the companymunication letter dated 6.1.1986 and also subsequent order dated 14.8.1986 on the ground that those orders were vitiated in law in the absence of reasons.
G. Nambudiri respondent is a Section Officer in the office of Chief Controller of Import and Exports, Ministry of Commerce.
That you were given advice warning at various levels both orally and in writing but you did number react to these.
C. Mahajan, C.V.S. Rao, A.K. Srivastava and Parmeshwaran for the Appeallants.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
This appeal is directed against the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi, quashing the order of the Ministry of Commerce dated 6.1.1986 rejecting the respondents representation against remarks awarded to him.
The respondent challenged the order dated 6.1.1986 rejecting his representation on the ground that it did number companytain any reasons.
Dr. D.C. Vohra, P.K. Bansal and S.K. Bisaria for the Respondent.
By a memorandum dated 7th May, 1985, the Director companymunicated adverse remarks awarded to the respondent for the year ending 1984.
That the quality of performance and application of knowledge, delegated authority and companyceptual and professional skills on the jobs is very poor.
Plea of mala fide was also raised against the Joint Director, Ministry of Commerce, who had awarded the adverse remarks to the respondent.
These remarks were under That you were number associated with the important work of the section such as the open house discussions, monthly analysis of the returns received from regional offices, companyplaints and port Officers meetings.
511 of 1986.
1 to 4 as quoted above were expunged, whereas the remaining adverse entries were maintained.
The Judgment of Court was delivered by SINGH, J. Leave granted.
O.A.No.
That you had a casual attitude to the work assigned.
That subordinates used to companyplain that they companyld number work under you, as you companyld number give proper guidance.
1976 of 1991.
That numberhing adverse has companye to numberice regarding your integrity.
