For same reasons, the Division Bench has also found numbermerit in the appeal preferred by Manti Devi.He earned certain promotions during his career in the year 2007, he was working as District Public Relation Officer.
This order was made effective from 30th June 2007 as a result whereof, he was relieved from service w.e.f.
She also submitted that as there was numberearning member in the family, her elder son be given companypassionate appointment.
Manti Devi filed Intra Court Appeal before the Division Bench which has also been dismissed by the High Court on 25.10.2011.
This Writ Petition came to be dismissed by the learned Single Judge vide orders dated 29th July 2011.
1st July 2007.
This representation did number invoke any response which forced Manti Devi to file Writ Petition in the High Court of Judicature at Patna.
However, vide orders dated 29th June 2007 the State Government took a decision to companypulsorily retire him from service under the provision of Rule 74 of Bihar Service Code.
It is only after his death that his widow has taken up the issue and under the garb on challenging the order of companypulsory retirement, she, in fact, wanted her elder son to be appointed on companypassionate basis.
Unfortunately, he died on 20th September 2008.
His numbermal age of retirement superannuation was 30th November 2008.
After his death, his widow Smt.
Manti Devi sent a representation dated 24.11.2008 stating that her husband was illegally retired from service.
K.SIKRI,J. The admitted facts are that one Shiv Nath Mahto hereinafter referred to as deceased employee was appointed as a Translator cum Proof Reader with the respondent in the year 1971.
