18929 18931 of 1991 the elections were held as directed by the Tribunal.
The Division Bench withdrew writ petitions to itself passed the Judgment under appeal quashing the orders of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal dated 2nd August, 1991 in Appeal No.
He claims to have enrolled 696 members this way.
But soon thereafter the Tribunals order was quashed.
The Deputy Registrar by his order dated 3rd June, 1991 dismissed the petition against which appellant brought up an appeal before the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal.
Subsequently on 11th of September, 1990 the Managing Committee was superseded by the Government under Section 30A of the Act and a Special Officer appointed.
But the then Managing Director of the Society appears to have decided to postpone the elections.
19670 19679 of 1990.
The appeal is against the Judgment and order dated 24th September, 1991 of the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court in Writ Petitions Nos.
The companytroversy relates to the elections to the Committee of Management of a companyoperative society called the Bharat Silk Filature Factory and Industries Co operative Society Ltd. Society Malavalli, Mandya District, which was registered on the 29th of March, 1983.
It is against this action of the Special Officer that on 31st May, 1991, appellant raised a dispute before the Deputy Registrar of the Co operative Societies seeking directions to the Special Officer to obey the mandamus issued by the High Court.
The Special Officer was directed by the High Court to hold the elections to the companymittee of management within a period of three months and handover the charge to the newly elected companymittee.
On 19th March, 1991, the High Court allowed the writ petitions and set aside the order of supersession.
5 in this appeal, to hold elections to the companymittee of management on the basis of the voters list existing as on 28th August, 1990 without enrolling further members.
But the Special Officer instead of holding the elections which obviously elections meant on the basis of the subsisting Voters List as on 19th March, 1990 started taking steps to enrol new members.
This order of the Tribunal was set aside by the Division Bench of the High Court which thought that the 696 members purported to be enrolled by the Special Officer were entitled to an opportunity of being heard before the Tribunal.
The order of supersession was challenged by the appellant and certain other directors of the Society before the Karnataka High Court in Writ Petitions Nos.
Its first Board of Directors was companystituted by the Government.
We have heard learned Counsel on both sides.
Appellant, T. Ramegowda, raised a dispute before the Deputy Registrar of Co operative Societies, DRCS Mandya in Arbitration Case No.
Special Leave granted.
18929 18931 of 1991.
The order appointing the Special Officer was also quashed.
309 of 1991 before it.
1 of 1991 under Section 70 of the Karnataka Co operative Societies Act, 1959 Act seeking a direction to the Special Officer, respondent No.
