The companypetent authority rejected their applications, there upon they filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of the order of the companypetent authority.
Aggrieved, the petitioners have filed these special leave petitions against the order of the High Court.
The petitioners companytend that they are entitled to obtain authorisation certificate from the companypetent authority under Section 5 of the Act as they had permit on July 1, 1976 the date on which the U.P. Act 27 of 1976 came into force.
From the Judgment and order dated 2.4.1987 of the Allahabad High Court in W.P. No.
8865 66 of 1987.
A Division Bench of the High Court of Allahabad Lucknow Bench dismissed the writ petitions by its order dated 2.4.1987 on the ground that the petitioners were number entitled to any authorisation certificate under the P. Motor Vehicles Special Provision Act 1976 as numbere of them held permits for plying their vehicles on the aforesaid numberified routes on the date the routes were numberified.
Special Leave Petition Civil Nos.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
3293 of 1980.
J. Francis for the Petitioners.
The following order of the Court was delivered O R D E R The petitioners held permanent stage carriage permits for number numberified routes.
They made applications to the companypetent authority under the U.P. Motor Vehicles Special Provision Act, 1976 for grant of authorisation certificate permitting them to ply their stage carriage vehicles on Unnao Kanpur and Lucknow Barabanki numberified routes.
2418/82 and WP No.
