The judgment and decree of the trial Court came to be challenged in the regular first appeal before the High Court by the present appellants in RFA No.
K.C. Saroja.
347/1998 holding that the appellants are number entitled to claim any share in the joint family properties.
Nagamma is entitled for 1/10 th share of joint family properties in the plaint which are scheduled Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by NEELAM GULATI Date 2019.01.23 165517 IST properties A to E and the properties in the plaint scheduled Reason F G were held to be the selfacquired properties of the testator, and property H was declared as the exclusive property of the Smt.
The appellants plaintiffs filed a suit on 16.1.1976 for 1/10 th share in the suit properties described in the schedule to the plaint as A to H. The learned trial Court decreed the suit declaring that the second plaintiff since first plaintiff died on 7.7.1978 leaving behind daughter Smt.
347/1998 and RFA No.
922/2001 was filed by the defendantsrespondents against the selfsame impugned judgment.
Rastogi, J. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Karnataka dismissing RFA No.
