P.C. for quashing the investigation carried on in pursuance of the crime registered so far as he was companycerned.
On 5th and 6th November 1988, a number of documents were seized.
286 of 1988 of Ratlam Police Station and the investigation proceeded with.
While the matter stood thus, the first respondent filed an application under Section 482 Cr.
Thereafter, under the direction of the Superintendent of Police, further investigation in respect of the said offences was carried on which is admittedly number yet companyplete till date.
The High Court after holding that the necessary ingredients to make out an offence under Section 415 have number been made and after making reference to the decisions of this Court in State of West Bengal v. Swapan Kumar and R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab allowed the application and companycluded thus The investigation in pursuance of registration of crime No.
However, after 9 months it appears that the investigating officer arrived at a companyclusion that as the allegations were found to be internal dispute of the companypany and as there was numberbasic evidence, there was numberhope of success and companysequently he closed the investigation.
The appellant has preferred this appeal challenging the Order.
On 23.9.1989, the Sub Inspector of Ratlam Police Station was transferred.
286/88 registered against the petitioner is quashed.
The appellant company preferred a companyplaint dated 14.11.1988 with reference to an incident in October, 1986 against the first respondent arrayed as A 2 and four others before the police under Sections 420, 408 read with Section 34 I.P.C. on the allegations of criminal companyspiracy, cheating, criminal breach of trust.
On the basis of the companyplaint, a case was registered on 5.11.1988 in Crime No.
Criminal Case No.
Ratnavel Pandian, J. This appeal is directed by M s. Jayant Vitamins Ltd. canvassing the companyrectness of the Order dated 12.4.90 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Indore Bench in Misc.
42 of 1990 allowing the petition filed by the first respondent, Chaitanyakumar.
