219 of 1949 50 against the Judgment and Decree dated the 21st September, 1949, of the Court of the Additional District fudge, Bhatinda, in Appeal No.
61 of 1948, arising from the Judgment and Decree dated the 10th August, 1948, of the Court of the Sub Judge 11 Class, Mansa, in Case No.
Appeal from the Judgment and Decree dated the 27th June, 1950, of the High Court of Judicature of Patiala and East Punjab States Union in Second Appeal No.
On 2nd November, 1914, after Harnam Singhs death, his daughter Mst.
In the High Court the learned Judges upheld the companycurrent finding about the number ancestral nature of the property.
As regards the acceleration, the learned Judge thought it necessary to examine a point which the plaintiffs had raised in the trial Court but which was ignored there, namely that a house was number included in the gift.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
Gopal Singh and Sardar Singh for the appellants.
Achhru Ram K. L. Mehta, with him for the respondent.
134 of 1947.
They claim to be the presumptive reversioners to one Harnam Singh who owned the property in dispute.
174 of 1952.
April 2.
Biro, the second defendant, gifted the plaint properties to her sons who have been grouped together as the first defendant.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by BOSE J. The plaintiffs appeal.
