Thereafter, the PSC has evolved the procedure, as stated in the affidavit filed by the PSC pursuant to our order dated 4.8.1994, thus He Chaimian the OPSC explained the system of evaluation of C. C. R. s. adopted by the PSC.
The names of 12 candidates, including ad hoc promoters were sent to the P.S.C. for companysideration.
Preceding regular appointment, the Government companystituted a Departmental Promotion Committee which had companysidered and recommended the cases of respondents for ad hoc promotion to the posts and the Govt.
While the appellants and respondents Biswajit Patnalk and Jagannath Prasad Mishra were companytinuing as Drug Inspectors, four vacancies for the post of Asstt.
Drugs Controller, junior Class I have arisen.
had appointed the respondents and referred the matter to the Public Service Commission for recommendation for regular appointments.
Delay companydoned.
Leave granted.
The PSC had thought over the feasibility to apply the principle of merit cum suitability with due regard to seniority secured the statutory rules applicable to similar selection posts in other deportments and after due delib eration adopted the aforesaid principle.
Two of them were found to be unfit.
Heard the learned companynsel.
We are informed that since two of them were already promoted to the higher posts of Grade I Deputy Drug Controllers, their cases were number companysidered.
