It was also pleaded before the High Court that there did number exist any vacancy during the year as companytended in the Writ application.
Writ Petition No.
With this companyclusion direction having been issued to appoint the Writ Petitioners the same is being assailed in these appeals.
Writ Petition No.
25696 of 1990 is being challenged in the first case and a similar direction of a learned Single Judge of Allahabad High Court dated 2.4.1993 passed in Civil Misc.
The appellant filed companynter affidavit companytroverting the allegations made in the Writ Applications and took the positive stand that the select list of the year 1987 became inoperative after lapse of one year from the date of selection and, therefore, the applicants who claimed to be in the select list prepared on 4.4.87 do number have any right to be appointed as the life of the list has expired by 4.4.88.
PATTANAIK, J. Leave granted.
The impugned direction of the learned Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court in Civil Misc.
