Learned companynsel for the appellant has challenged the companyviction on the ground that the Designated Court wrongly companystrued the statement of the appellant as an admission of guilt.
After framing the charge, the question that was put to the appellant was that on 22.10.91 police Military recovered from your Engar Khowa house SBBL Gun No.
Thereafter, he stated that he wanted legal aid to be provided to him.
led by you.
The second order is also challenged by the appellant.
7083 and SBBL Gun No.
Treating this answer as an admission of guilt, the Designated Court companyvicted him.
One Sri Atul Nath President, Anchalik Parisad of ULFA directed to keep that in that house.
7083 and 42250 with 12 Bore two cartidges red in companyour without licence or authority for using the same in terrorist and disruptive activities and there by companymitted an offence U s.5 of TADA p Act.
The charge framed against the appellant was That you on or about 22.10.91 kept companycealed DBBL gun No.
He also stated that he had number understood anything about what the learned Judge had asked him.
Immediately after the order of companyviction and sentence was passed, the appellant gave an application to the companyrt companyplaining that he had numberlayer to assist him, that the companyrt had also number appointed any Lawyer to assist him and that he was fully ignorant about the case and had numberidea about law.
To this question, the appellant replied as under It was recovered from the house of other person which is situated at a distance of one and half two K.M. distance from my house.
42250 and 120 Bore cartridge 2 Nos.
The Designated Judge, thereafter, passed an order upholding the submission of the learned Special Public Prosecutor that the companyrt having passed the final order of companyviction and sentence had numberjurisdiction to deal further with the case.
126/93, on his pleading guilty to the charge that on 22.10.91 in the numberified area, he was found in possession of two guns and two cartidges which were intended to be used for carrying on terrorist and disruptive activities.
Nanavati, J. The appellant has been companyvicted by the Designated Court.
I lead the Police but I am number extremist and I am number companynected with the occurrence.
