As numbered above, the review was allowed and the writ petition was dismissed as being number maintainable.
By the impugned order, the earlier order passed in Civil Writ Petition No.
ORDER The present appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in Civil Review No.
Reliance for this purpose was placed on two Division Bench judgments of the High Court holding that the High Court had numberjurisdiction to entertain the writ petition.
This view was taken primarily on the ground that the respondent was a Cooperative Society and was, therefore, number companyered within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India, 1950 in short the Constitution .
1844 of 1995 was recalled and it was held that the High Court had numberjurisdiction to entertain the writ petition.
9 of 1998.
