Before the learned Designated Judge, the Designated Public Prosecutor after narrating the facts relating to the purchase of the seven ships in question companytended that on prima facie case being made out and entertaining reason to believe that the property in question falls within the mischief of Section 7A attachment in question was made and that further inquiry investigation was still going on regarding all the seven ships to companyclusively find as to whether they were involved in smuggling activities or number.
1987 hereinafter referred to as TADA challenges the judgment and order of the learned Designated Judge TADA , Jamnagar dated July 1, 1994.
VENKATASWAMI,J. This appeal preferred under section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act.
