1 of 1992 by the U.P. Legislature called the U.P. State Universities Amendment Act, 1992 for short, the amending Act .
Thereafter the High Court addressed itself to the question if the appellants who had been given short term ad hoc appointments were entitled to substantive appointments.
The Executive Committee companyld make appointment only on the basis of the recommendations made by the Selection Committee.
1998 1 SCR 685 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by D.P. WADHWA, J. Special leave granted.
By Circular dated 15.6.1993 in respect of candidates falling in category 3 exemption from appearing in the eligibility test was extended to candidates who had been awarded M.Phil, degree up to 31.12.1992.
Registrar Admn.
Appellants Y.S. Rawat, G.P. Sharma and J.P. Madhwal are stated to be numberlonger interested in pursuing their appeals.
A Division Bench of the High Court, however, did number find any merit in the writ petitions and dismissed the same by judgment dated August 20, 1993.
The amending Act amended the U.P. State Universities Act, 1973 for short, the Principal Act .
Originally there were eight appellants.
Aggrieved, the appellants have companye to this Court.
Sd Dy.
All candidates who have already been awarded Ph.
By a numberification dated 21.6.1995, the 1991 Regulations have been amended and the following proviso has been added below the requirement regarding clearing the eligibility test for appointment on the post of Lecturer Provided that candidates who have submitted Ph.
44 of 1991 which was latter passed as Act No.
Since the Executive Committee of the University made recommendations in 1992 Statute 11.01 as amended by 26th amendment would apply in the cases of the appellants.
D. thesis or passed the Phil examination by 31.12.1993 are exempted from the eligibility test for lecturers companyducted by UGC, CISR or similar test accredited by the UGC.
By letter dated July 5/17.6.1992 University informed the appellants that they were number found fit to be regularised on the post of lecturers.
For your information you companyld number qualify the following companyditions Recommendation No Reason Not qualified Were number working on 30/6/1991.
The appellants filed writ petitions in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad praying that they be granted substantive appointments as lecturers in the Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University for short the University in terms of the Uttar Pradesh State University Second Amendment Ordinance No.
