Hence the present appeal.
The appellant then moved the Judicial Commissioner, Vindhya Pradesh, for a writ of certiorari quashing the order of the Appellate Tribunal on the ground that it disclosed an error on the face of it because under the Act numberappeal lay from the order that was passed by the subordinate authority.
The respondent Anant Prasad who will be referred to as the respondent, made a representation against the renewal of the appellants permit.
That permit was due to expire on December 11, 1955, and so on September 12, 1955, he made an application for its renewal for a further period.
It is number in dispute that the order meant that the appellants permit was renewed for three years.
Appeal from the judgment and order dated April 21, 1956, of the former Judicial Commissioners Court, Rewa, in Misc.
The respondent preferred an appeal against this order to the Vindhya Pradesh Transport Appellate Tribunal, the appellate authority under the Act.
284 of 1958.
It was companytended by the appellant before the Appellate Tribunal that the appeal was number companypetent.
No express order was made on the respondents application for the grant of the permit to him.
On December 9, 1955, the State Transport Authority, Vindhya Pradesh, made an order in the following terms Renewed for three years .
The appellant was the holder of a permit to run a stage carriage on a stretch of the public highway called the Rewa Singrauli route, in the State of Vindhya Pradesh which is number merged in the State of Madhya Pradesh.
He also applied for the grant of the permit to himself.
27 of 1956.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SARKAR, J. This appeal arises out of an application for a writ of certiorari and involves questions of interpretation of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 4 of 1939 , by.
The Appellate Tribunal rejected this companytention and passed an order cancelling the Permit granted to the appellant by the State Transport Authority and issuing the permit to the respondent.
Civil Writ No.
Bhagwan Das Jain, for respondent No.
April 21.
Naunit Lal, for the appellant.
