Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated 27 1 1975 of the Rajasthan High Court in D.B. Crl.
The Sessions Judge delivered the judgment on March 30, 1974 and the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, came into force from April 1, 1974.
It appears that the State of Rajasthan preferred a petition for leave to appeal under section 378 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, on June 27, 1974, which was within the period of limitation prescribed under article 114 b of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Respondents Budharam and Ramdeen were companyvicted under section 323 Being aggrieved by the judgment of the Sessions Judge, the State of Rajasthan preferred an appeal against acquittal of the major charges under section 378 of the Code of Crimi nal Procedure, 1973.
343 of 1976.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
Doongar Singh and S.K. Garnbhir, for the respondents.
The appeal was, therefore, preferred under the new Code.
Respondent Sangram was companyvicted under section 304 Part 11, IPC.
575/74 M. Jain, I. Makwana and D. Shandari, for the appellant.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by GOSWAMI, J. The respondents were tried by the Sessions Judge, Merta Rajasthan for offences under sections 302, 302/149 and some other minor sections of the Indian Penal Code.
Respondent Dayal ram was companyvicted under section 324 IPC.
Respondent Goparam was acquitted of all the charges.
The other respondents also were acquitted of the charges under .sections 302 and 302/149, IPC.
Appeal No.
