By the impugned order, the High Court has, during the pendency of the Writ Petition filed by the landlord respondent No.1 against the judgment of Additional District Judge, Saharanpur who set aside the eviction order passed by prescribed authority, directed the tenant petitioner to pay rent at the rate of Rs.
At the hearing, the learned companynsel appearing on behalf of the respondent stated that the impugned order may be set aside and the High Court may be directed to dispose of the writ petition.
150/ per month will have to pay Rs.
The effect of this order is that the petitioner, who was paying Rs.
Heard learned companynsel for the parties.
2100/ per month in respect of the tenanted premises.
Leave granted.
2100/ per month.
