Therefore, the companyclusions drawn by the Tribunal were justified and there companyld be numberreason to upturn them.
one Dudhrechia.
Aggrieved by the said Order imposing punishment upon him, he filed an application before the Gujarat Civil Services Tribunal.
Upon holding a disciplinary proceeding, the enquiry officer submitted a Report on 6.12.1997 stating that the charges against him have been proved.
The disciplinary authority directed his removal from service by an Order dated 26.10.1998.
It was further held From the Department, it is submitted that Dudhrechia has denied entrusting the work to appellant but as stated above Dudhrechia would never admit and the submission of appellant gets credence that this is number an after thought in the appeal but it was put to the companycerned clerk at the enquiry, at first in point of time.
At the relevant time, however, he was serving in the Accounts Department as a Summary Clerk.
A chargesheet was issued against him.
An inspection was companyducted in the Licence Branch of the Regional Transport Office during the period 21.8.1995 to 13.9.1995.
Also the order is too harsh.
He had been working in the Department for Grant of Licence.
B. SINHA, J Gajanand M. Dalwadi, since deceased delinquent officer was working in the Regional Transport Office under the Commissioner of Transport in the State of Gujarat.
