That the appellant was discharged from service 1 year 5 months and 24 days before he companyld companyplete pensionable service.
Hence, the present appeals.
That the appellant suffered four red ink entries during the period between 7.6.1993 and 3.5.1994.
That the appellant challenged the order of discharge before the Armed Forces Tribunal.
The appellant thereafter preferred the review application, which also came to be dismissed.
Shri Shoumit Mukherjee, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant has vehemently submitted that the appellant came to be discharged from service solely on the basis of four red ink entries which the appellant suffered after a period of 13 years of his service and that too during the period between 7.6.1993 and 3.5.1994.
R. SHAH, J. Leave to appeal is granted.
Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 6.2.2015 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal Bench at Jaipur, Rajasthan in T.A. No.
2 of 2011, by which the learned Tribunal has dismissed the application Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by NARENDRA PRASAD Date 2019.09.20 170428 IST Reason preferred by the appellant herein and has companyfirmed the order passed by the respondents discharging the appellant from service under Rule 13 3 III v of the Army Rules, 1954, original applicant has preferred the present appeals.
That for every red ink entry he was separately punished.
