in respect of the first incident it is gr 1036/73 and in respect of the second incident it is gr 1246/73.
in respect of the 2nd incident case number 118 under sections 148 149 and 307 i.p.c.
it appears that in respect of the two incidents mentioned in the two grounds there were two firs filed before the police.
the detaining authority said in the grounds it is apparent in the aforesaid facts that you in companylusion with your father are likely to withhold or impede supply of foodstuffs or rationed article essential to the companymunity.
and section 9 of the west bengal p.o.
4 of the west bengal essential foodstuffs anti hoarding order 1966.
the ground given in madan lal agarwals case is that he in companylusion with his father had hoarded 8 quintals 84 k. of rice 2 quintals 88 kg.
the future behaviour of madan lal agarwal based on his past companyduct in the light of surrounding circumstances is the real ground of detention.
gurdit singh ratan singh and hasib khan of the said workshop sustained injuries on their person at the aforesaid date time and place.
act was filed before the police magistrate alipore against the petitioner bibhuti dutta and sakti pada dutta.
of suji and further that he had numberlicence as 10 sc 75 3 required by sec.
it was said in the case of haradhan saba that he was released on 25th july 1973 and he was arrested on 7th august 1973 pursuant to a detention order dated 31st july 1973.
original jurisdiction writ petition number 4 of 1975.
in respect of the 1st incident case number 102 under sections 451 148 149 and 324 i.p.c.
k. ramamurthi g. miikhoty and rathin das for the petitioner.
of flour and quintal 96 kg.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by alagiriswami j. the petitioner has been detained under the provisions of the maintenance of internal security act in pursuance of an order passed by the companymissioner of police of calcutta on 24 4 1974.
petition under article 32 of the companystitution of india.
as a result 3 security personnel viz.
that at about 12.05 hours on 24 5 73 you along with your associates being armed with pistol and bombs formed an unlawful assembly on transport depot road calcutta and created a great disturbance of public order by explod ing high explosive bombs on transport depot road calcutta near the workers gate of m s. lipton tea company at the aforesaid date and time with a view to terrorising the local people as well as the workers of the said companypany.
on 24 4 1974 in both these cases the police applied before the magistrate requesting that the petitioner may be discharged for his detention under the maintenance of internal security act.
as a result of your action as aforesaid widespread panic and companyfusion were created in the above area and thereby affected the maintenance of public order.
sections 3 and 5 of the essential supplies act and sections 25 and 27 of the arms act was filed before the police magistrate alipore against the petitioner and three others bibhuti dutta sakti pada dutta and raghu nath show.
the same action was taken against bibhuti dutta and sakti pada dutta also.
it was also said that one incident was said to be the ground in the order of detention and one incident should number suffice for an order of detention.
this again illustrates as to how these detention orders came to be passed to prevent the likelihood of such acts prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies essential to the companymunity.
n. mukherjee s. basu and g. s. chatterjee for the respondent.
the grounds for detention order are that at about 05.40 hours on 9 5 73 you along with your associates about 10 in number forcibly scaled over the boundary wall of garden reach workshop manufacturing defence materials at 61 garden reach road calcutta and when resisted by the security staff of the said workshop you along with your said associates being reinforced by about 25 others assembled and formed a violent mob on an open plot of land beyond the western boundary wall of the said workshop and incessantly hurled brickbats which companytinued till 08 00 hours aiming at the security staff of the said workshop creating serious disturbances there.
in companysequence fear frightfulness and insecurity prevailed amongst the workmen and authorities of the above workshop leading to the suspension of defence production for some time in the said workshop in general and in the drum plant of the workshop in particular which was prejudicial to the maintenance of public order.
