It is number necessary to elaborate the facts.
By judgment dated 17th of April, 1987, the High Court set aside the order of termination and directed reinstatement of the respondent in service and granted all companysequent financial benefits which he would have been entitled to had his service number been terminated.
2386 of 1983.
8342 of 1992 is being challenged in this appeal inter alia on the ground that the respondent having been companysidered for promotion to the post of General Manager but number promoted as he was number found suitable and the criteria for promotion being merit and suitability, the High Court companymitted error in directing the appellant to reconsider the question of promotion to the post of General Manager.
His services stood terminated by order dated 7.11.83.
The respondent, therefore, approached the High Court by filing a writ petition which was allowed with the direction as already stated.
The said order of termination was challenged by the respondent by filing a writ petition in the Orissa High Court which was registered as Original Jurisdiction Case No.
Suffice it to say that the respondent had been appointed as Assistant Manager in the Orissa Small Industries Corporation Ltd. On 23rd of May, 1981.
PATTANAIK, J. The judgment and order dated 6.1.94 of the Orissa High Court passed in Original Jurisdiction Case No.
