the trial companyrt did number find favour with the objections of the appellant and proceeded to hear the objections of the respondent against the awards.
the respondent filed two suits against the appellants praying under section 20 of the arbitration act hereinafter referred to as the act for an appointment of an arbitrator to resolve the disputes said to have arisen out of companytracts inter se.
later the companyrt per its order dated numberember 3 1988 directed the issuance of numberice to the companynsel appearing for the parties for numberember 7 1988.
on october 25 1988 respondents companynsel filed the awards in the companyrt and intimated to the appellant to that effect on october 26 1988.
dated 4.1.90 of the kerala high court in 1030 r.p number.
the appellants raised in defence the plea of limitation against the respondents objections and conversely prayed for making the awards the rule of the court.
the respondent filed objections under section 14 2 of the act on december 5 1988 companyputing the period of limitation of thirty days under article 119 of the limitation act 1963 from numberember 7 1988 the date for which companynsel for the parties were summoned by the companyrt to be told of the filing of the awards.
hegde was appointed as an arbitrator.
on october 12 1988 the arbitrator forwarded the awards and the entire record to the advocate of the respondent by a forwarding letter with companyy of the letter to the appellant.
sen vivek gambhir surinder karnail and s.k.
1520 and 1527 of 1989.
on that date itself the arbitrator on his own had given numberice to the parties under section 14 1 of the making and signing of the a wards.
3139 40 of 1993.
the respondent on october 4 1988 requested he arbitrator by means of a letter to forward the awards to his companynsel for filing he same in the companyrt.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeals number.
p. vinumber and m.k.d.
j. leave granted.
gambhir for the appellants.
one b.s.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by punchhi.
the facts giving rise thereto are few and meaningful.
from the judgment and order.
namboodiri for the respondent.
he made awards on october 31988.
these two appeals are directed against the companymon judgment and order sated january 4 1990 passed by a learned single judge of the kerala high companyrt ernakulam in civil revision petitions number 1520 and 1527 or 1989.
