Thereafter, she was appointed on regular basis to the post of Company Secretary by Office Order dated 22.04.2014.
By the impugned judgment and order, the Division Bench has dismissed the said appeal and has companyfirmed the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition.
The appellant submitted her reply to the above show cause numberice.
The order passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition was the subject matter of the appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court by way of LPA No.160 of 2015.
The order passed by the Division Bench in LPA No.160 of 2015 is the subject matter of the present appeal.
The order of termination was challenged by the appellant before the High Court in Writ Petition C No.977 of 2015.
A show cause numberice dated 01.11.2014 was issued by respondent number2 calling upon the appellant to explain why her services should number be terminated as she did number have the requisite five years experience for the post of Company Secretary.
Shri Sunil Kumar, learned Senior Counsel has appeared on behalf of the appellant herein and Shri Gourab Banerji, learned Senior Counsel has appeared on behalf of respondent number2 herein.
By order dated 02.02.2015, the learned Single Judge dismissed the said petition.
Respondent number2 thereafter vide its order dated 02.01.2015 terminated the services of the appellant.
R.SHAH, J. Leave granted.
Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi dated 31.07.2017 passed in Letter Patent Appeal LPA Signature Not Verified SUSHIL KUMAR RAKHEJA No.160 of 2015 by which the Division Bench has dismissed the Digitally signed by Date 2019.02.05 174210 IST Reason said appeal and has companyfirmed the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 02.02.2015 passed in Writ Petition C No.977 of 2015 dismissing the said writ petition by number interfering with the order terminating the services of the appellant, the original writ petitioner has preferred the present appeal.
