Post summoning evidence was also adduced by the companyplainant on 26.3.2007 by way of an affidavit.
Pre summoning evidence by the companyplainant was recorded by way of an affidavit.
His cross examination started 12.9.2008.
It number appears that respondent examined himself and was cross examined at length.
By reason of the impugned judgment, the same has been dismissed.
B. Sinha, J. Leave granted.
Appellant is before us aggrieved by and dissatisfied with a judgment and order dated 9.5.2008 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Criminal M.C. No.1522 of 2008.
Respondent filed a companyplaint petition in the Court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi on or about 7.6.2004 which was marked as Criminal Complaint Case No.882/1 of 2004 for companymission of an alleged offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for short, the Act .
Cognizance of the offence was taken and summons was directed to be issued by an order dated 9.6.2004.
