21 upon which the High Court has relied is of a date three years later than the Notification under Section 4 but numbermaterial was produced before the Court to suggest that there was any fluctuation in the market rate at Meerut from 1948 onwards tiir.
21, on which the High Court has relied, companynsel for the State urged before us that there were two companypromise documents of the year 1949 Ex.
B under which the Housing Society had purchased land from one Khan Bahadur Sheikh Wahiduddin and his tenants and the rate of Re.
21 was purchased by the Society itself.
21 was of a date three years later than the relevant date of the Notification under Section 4.
21 where under the Co operative Society itself had purchased a part of this land at a price calculated at the rate of Rs.
Principally the High Court relied upon a sale deed dated July 11, 1951 Ex.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 under which the prices varying from Rs.
Counsel for the Stale companytended that the other sale deeds had been rejected on the ground that they pertained to companyparatively smaller areas of land but the same reason was applicable to Ex.
21 also, for Ex.
When the matter was carried in appeal to the High Court by the claimants, the High Court enhanced the rate of companypensation from Rs.
1/ /6 per sq.
were also relied upon by the claimants but the High Court rejected the other sale deeds as affording proper guidance and accepted the rate of Rs.
21 also related to a smaller area.
It is true that the sale deed Ex.
2/12/ per sq.
5/ per sq.
2/12 per sq.
2/12/ per sq.
Secondly, companynsel companytended that Ex.
yd for enhancing the rate of companypensation.
Other sale deeds at Exs.
As against Ex.
A and Ex.
at which the land under these two documents had been purchased ought to have been accepted by the High Court.
at which land under Ex.
to Rs.
