On publication of advertisement in the year 1996 as aforenoted, a writ petition was filed in the High Court by Sandeep Singh, Lalit Kumar, Virender Lather and Virender Singh Dahiya petitioners in Writ Petition Nos.217, 218 and 224/02 claiming right to be appointed to posts in Executive Branch relying upon the decision of this Court in Hooda s case.
In a Special Leave Petition filed in this Court, Amarjit Singh Mann, Dinesh Singh Yadav being similarly placed as Virender Singh Hooda, were impleaded as parties and the said petition was disposed of on 30th October, 1995 by this Court granting liberty to the aforesaid persons to file proper petition before the High Court.
The applicants who applied in response to the advertisement took written test and on the basis of result thereof, candidates were called for physical efficiency and measurement test and viva voce between 28th January, 1991 and 31st January, 1991.
On 4th May, 1999, the Commission made the recommendations for appointments and thereafter on 1st June, 1999 the State Government made 20 appointments to the Executive Branch and 33 appointments to the Allied Services were also made on different dates from 23rd June, 1999 to 28th July, 1999.
The Railway Board, however, issued statutory numberification dated 5th December, 1988 in which the existing percentage of running allowance which form part of average emoluments was reduced to 45 w.e.f.
Writ Petition Civil No.6G57 of 1994 filed by Virender Singh Hooda who companyld number be appointed to the Executive Branch in view of his merit position as aforenoticed seeking such appointment against the posts of the Executive Branch advertised on 24th November, 1992, was dismissed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana on 12th May, 1994.
A companymon written examination was held in February, 1991, the result was declared in December 1991, interviews were held between 31st March, 1992 and 9th June, 1992 and the final result was declared on 19th June, 1992.
On 24th November, 1992, another advertisement was issued by the Commission for filling up of 12 posts 9 general and 3 reserved in Executive Branch and 50 in Allied Services.
The three petitioners in Writ Petition Civil No.215 of 2002, Virender Singh Hooda, Amarjit Singh Mann and Dinesh Singh Yadav, having regard to their position in the merit list being at serial Nos.8, 10 and 12 respectively were number appointed to the posts in the Executive Branch as only 7 general category posts were advertised.
The case of the aforesaid six officers companycerns the advertisement issued in the year 1989 and their claim for appointment to the posts in Executive Branch is based on the advertisement in respect of posts advertised in the year 1992 as aforesaid.
The appointment letters were issued between 3rd April and 6th April, 1991 to 18 persons since there was an order of the High Court for reserving one post for ex serviceman.
By letter dated 29th March, 1991, the Board forwarded to Director General of Police, the names of 19 candidates who were recommended in the order of merit for appointment to the post of Inspector of Police.
The written examination was held in December, 2000 and January, 2001, interviews were held between 22nd October, 2001 and 19th November, 2001 and the final result was declared on 3rd May, 2002.
Relying upon the decision in Hoodas case, the claim of Sujan Singh, Pushpindar Singh and Pardeep Goodra petitioners in Writ Petition No.216/02 being similarly placed as the petitioners in Hoodas case, was accepted by the High Court for being appointed against posts advertised in the year, 1992.
The writ petition was dismissed by the High Court but the judgment of the High Court was set aside by this Court on 9th November, 2000 in Civil Appeal No.7422 of 1999.
The appointments to the 12 posts were made in December, I992 and to the 48 posts on various dates between December, 1992 and April, 1993.
Virender Singh Hooda, Amerjeet Singh Mann and Dinesh Singh Yadav who were appointed to posts in Executive Branch as numbericed hereinbefore were on the merit list at serial Nos.8, 10 and 12 respectively.
On 29th January, 1999 another advertisement was issued by the Commission for filling up 14 posts in Executive Branch and 53 in the Allied Services.
The appointments to the 12 posts in the Executive Branch were made on 25th June, 1997 and to the posts in the Allied Services on different dates between June and July, 1997.
Gram Panchayat passed a resolution to companylect permission fee from the respondent on the capital value of the factory building at a specific rate.
The Commission on 22nd June, 1992 made recommendations for making appointment against 12 posts in Haryana Civil Service and 48 posts in the Allied Services to the State Government.
By letter dated 22nd March, 1976, the percentage of running allowance was reduced from 75 to 45 retrospectively w.e.f.
On 24th May, 1996, another advertisement was issued by the Commission for filling up 10 posts in the Executive Branch and 33 in the Allied Services.
A writ petition was filed challenging the power to levy house tax and other fees.
The selection, recommendation and appointments were challenged by various candidates who were number selected by filing writ petitions under Article 226 in the High Court.
These three were appointed on 3rd December, 1989 in companypliance of the decision in Hoodas case dated 13th April, 1989.
The final result was declared on 15th March, 1996 and on the same day recommendations were made by the Commission for the appointments as per merit and options exercised by the candidates.
One of the grounds urged was that number of posts that companyld be filled companyld number exceed the number of posts that were advertised and that the number of candidates called for interview companyld number exceed three times the number of posts that were advertised.
The written examination was held in December, I997/ January, 1998, interviews were held between 16th March.
The Director General of Police, however, on 24th January, 1991 sent a revised requisition for eight posts of Inspector of Police.
The Special Leave Petition filed by the State Government challenging the judgment of High Court dated 13th January.
On 3rd December, 1999, in companypliance with the judgment of this Court, the aforesaid 3 persons were appointed to the posts in Executive Branch.
These four candidates as already numbericed pursuant to their position on merit list 1992 advertisement had been appointed to the posts in Allied Services and number in the Executive Branch.
These appeals have been filed by.the State Government challenging the impugned judgment of the High Court granting relief to the two respondents who belong to 1989 batch.
Sandeep Singh, Lalit Kumar, Virender Lather and Virender Singh Dahiya were appointed to posts in Allied Services and number Executive Branch in view of their merit.
The respondents in these two appeals Ajay Malik and Arvind Malhon in 1989 merit list prepared by the Commission are at serial Nos.9 and 11 respectively.
The interviews were held between 29th January, 1996 and 11th March, 1996.
The written examination for these posts was held in October, 1993 but the result of the said examination was declared on 20th January, 1996.
2001 was dismissed on 12th October, 2001.
They also imposed house tax and demanded payment for the period 1966 to 1969.
The candidates who were selected and recommended as a result of this advertisement have filed Writ Petition No.
1st April, 1976.
1st Jaunary, 1973.
Review Petition was also dismissed on 19th February, 2002.
That petition was filed but it was also dismissed by the High Court.
1999 and 7th April, 1999 and the final result was declared on 29th April, 1999.
The State was facing serious legal difficulties.
The Commission made recommendations on 6th June, 2002.
This was quashed by the Central Administrative Tribunal which order became final since it was number further challenged.
As a result, these three were also appointed to the posts in Executive Branch on 4th March, 1992.
By a companyrigendum to this advertisement, 10 more posts in the Executive Branch were added.
One of them was already holding the post of Excise and Taxation Officer and other two were appointed to posts in the Allied Services, one as Excise and Taxation Officer and other as Tehsildar.
