1 to 4.
Subsequently another application in O.A. No.
2001 Supp 3 SCR 14 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAJENDRA BABU, J. These appeals arise out of certain proceedings in O.A. No.
Thereafter review application filed against the same having failed, these appeals are filed by special leave.
A Division Bench of the Tribunal after going through the record of the selection and the mark sheets found that out of the total marks of 100, 35 marks have been allotted to written test, 40 marks for practical test and 25 marks for viva voce.
The Chief Engineer rejected the said representation upon which A. No.
1 to 4, who were working as Electricians HS , Grade II, by O.A. No.
1308/93 was filed by respondent Nos.
1 to 4 before the Tribunal challenging this very selection which had been upheld in O.A.No.
1308/93 came to be disposed of with a direction to dispose of the representation to be made to the Chief Engineer.
The Tribunal on the third occasion examined the matter at the instance of the same set of applicants and adverted to the direction in O.A. No.
418/94 was filed.
The Tribunal proceeded to state that the tabulation sheets or the mark sheets have been destroyed and were number made available to the Tribunal and on that basis directed for a fresh selection.
771/93 challenged the selection of the appellants as Electricians HS .
771/93 without seeking review of the said order or preferring appeal to this Court in the ordinary companyrse.
771/93 is a fact recorded in companyrse of its judgment by another bench of the Tribunal.
However, the new application in O.A. No.
It is rather strange that that companyrse was adopted by the Tribunal.
On the basis of the marks obtained by them, the appellants have been promoted to the higher grade, which is a selection grade, and dismissed the application of respondent Nos.
That the records of the selection and the mark sheets have been examined by the Tribunal while disposing of O.A. No.
418/94 filed before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal .
All the applicants had number obtained the qualifying minimum marks of 50 per cent prescribed for general candidates and 40 per cent marks for SC ST candidates.
Respondent Nos.
