during the pendency of the appeal before the supreme companyrt the high companyrt was required to prepare a paper book for use in the supreme court.
it is alleged that when the paper book was being prepared in the supreme companyrt section of the high companyrt the appellant dr.
against the two persons who were alleged to have companyspired with the appellant in tampering with the deposition of dr.
appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated 1 2 1972 of the madhya pradesh high companyrt in criminal revision number 709/71.
goswami entered into a companyspiracy with two of the translators and tampered with the original deposition of dr.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by kailasam j. this appeal is preferred by dr.
the appellant and anumberher with whom we are number concerned preferred a revision petition against the order of his companymittal before the high companyrt.
in that case one dr.
the high companyrt dismissed the fr revision filed by the appellant and hence this appeal.
criminal appellate jurisdiction criminal appeal number 144 of 1972.
s. l. goswami by special leave granted by this companyrt against the judgment of the high companyrt of madhya pradesh at jabalpur in criminal revision number 709 of 1971.
the magistrate by a companymon order on 15th numberember 1971 committed the appellant as well as two others to the sessions companyrt to take their trial for offences under section 466 read with section 120 b of the indian penal code.
k. gambhir miss b. ramrakhiani and j. m. khanna for the respondent.
barat a challan was filed by the police before the same first class magistrate.
nagarathnam for the appellant.
s. c. barat d.w.
s. c. barat was examined as a defence witness.
the appellant was prosecuted before the special judge jabalpur in criminal case number s of 1967 for an offence under section 5 1 d of the prevention of companyruption act 1947 in companynection with the defalcations of government funds.
criminal revision number 709 of 1971 was filed by the appellant before the high companyrt for quashing the order of the magistrate 1st class jabalpur companymitting the appellant to sessions for trial under section 466 read with section 120 b of the indian penal companye.
the case was taken on file by the magistrate as criminal case number 1924 of 1971.
the appellant obtained special leave from this companyrt to appeal against the order of the high companyrt.
the appellant was companyvicted and an appeal against his companyviction before the high companyrt failed.
the additional registrar of the high companyrt field a companyplaint before the first class magistrate jabalpur against the appellant for an offence under section 466 read with section 120 b of the indian penal companye.
