From the Judgment and Order dated 29.7.1985 of the Bombay High Court in W.P. No.
The appellant, who is a local resident, challenged the allotment on the ground that the procedure for settlement as laid down in Rule 59 read with Rule 58 was number followed before the grant.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The purpose obviously is to enable the members of general public to apply for the proposed lease.
K. Dholakia, A.S. Bhasme and A.M. Khanwilkar for the Respondents.
This case is dependent on the companyrect meaning and scope of Rule 59 of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 hereinafter referred to as the Rules .
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHARMA, J. Notice for final disposal of the case was served on the respondents.
A certain area in village Bazargaon, District Nagpur was reserved for Nistar purposes that is, for grazing of cattle etc.
3255 of 1989.
A. Bobde, S.D. Mudaliar and A.G. Ratnapaxkhi for the Appellant.
Heard the learned companynsel for the parties.
The respond ent No.
Special leave is granted.
4 applied for grant of a mining lease in regard to the said area which was allowed.
2137 of 1979.
