A 11 was companyferred with a limited interest in terms thereof.
Raghavamma and also another gift deed bequeathing lands in favour of his daughter Smt.
On her demise on April 7, 1973, the appellant filed an application and patta to the entire extent was granted exclusively in favour of the first appellant.
Thereunder, the husband of the respondent laid the claim for Ryotwari patta.
A 3 and A 4 that what she obtained under the companypromise decree, Ex.
543 of 1977.
Subsequently, this widow Raghavamma filed OS No.182/53 in the Sub Court, Tenali for partition of all the properties into equal shares between herself and the appellant.
Under the companyprise decree, the property bequeathed in favour of the respondent.
On appeal, in TAS No.
Therein a companypromise was effected and a decree in terms thereof under Ex.
She accepted, acted on and enjoyed for life.
This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, made on 23.3.1985 in Appeal No.
Raghavamma had executed a will in favour of the respondent bequeathing the property obtained under Ex.
In furtherance thereof, the respondent filed OS No.
A 4 in favour of his mother to enjoy the property during her life time as limited owner.
Thereby, she had acknowledged that she had a life interest in the properties and under the companypromise decree.
On appeal, it was decreed.
the balance property was partitioned in equal shares 6.5 acres with a right of reversion to the appellant on the demise of Raghavamma.
The Settlement Officer negatived the claim of the appellant and granted patta in favour of Krishnamurthy, namely, the husband of the respondent.
Therein also she had acknowledged that she had life interest in the companypromise decree under Ex.
After the estate was abolished under the AP AA Estate Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari Act 1948 for short, the Abolition Act , the claim under Section 15 of the Act was filed.
The trial Court dismissed the suit.
Equally, the appellant has executed another gift deed to an extent of 1.97 acres bequeathing under Ex.
94/73 of possession of the properties under the will dated July 6, 1972.
B 3, in favour of the third party alienating 1.50 acres of land has under the companypromise decree.
Subsequently, on April 25, 1959, the appellant has executed another gift deed to an extent of 1.50 acres of land in favour of third party jointly with his mother wherein she acknowledged that the property has by Raghavamma under companypromise decree under Ex.
Seetharamratna Ranganayakamma, the respondent herein.
84/61 dated December 3, 1962, the appellate authority set aside the order and granted joint patta in favour of appellant No.1 and his mother Raghavamma.
Ranganayakamma was affirmed.
This was also pursuant to the companypromise decree under Ex.
A 11 was passed on July 13, 1955.
He died on December 2, 1950 leaving behind him his widow Raghavamma, his minor son, the appellant herein and his daughter the respondent.
The properties sold by the appellant to the third party also was affirmed.
Raghavamma, the mother of the first respondent and the first appellant has executed a sale deed, Ex.
Thus, this appeal by special leave.
The admitted facts are that one V. Satyanarayana has executed a will dated December 1, 1950 bequeathing 2.66 acres of wet land in favour of his wife Smt.
