Leila Seth and V.B. Bansal, JJ.
agreed with Nag, J. that the companydition of deposit of tax amount under Section 170 b of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 hereinafter referred to as the Act is a companydition precedent for hearing or determination of the appeal and the District Judge had numberdiscretion to grant stay of the disputed amount or dispense with the requirement of pre deposit of the amount in appeal, with or without companyditions, in the office of the Corporation.
They also agreed as to the amount which was to be so deposited.
Yogeshwar Dayal, J. This appeal has been preferred against the Full Bench decision of the Delhi High Court dated 1st February, 1991.
