The aggravating and mitigating circumstances were also companysidered.
When Durga Banchhor tried to intervene, she was pushed away by the appellant who then fled from the spot.
288/2011 dated 25.06.2013.
The High Court while companyfirming the companyviction and death sentence, relied upon the testimony of PW 15 Sonu who is a child witness, PW 11 Durga Bai, PW 8 Basanta, PW 9 Sukhdev Yadav and PW 10 Jailal Dhankar, apart from post mortem reports.
Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by JAYANT KUMAR ARORA Date 2018.11.28 190628 IST Reason Ratna Sahu daughter in law of Anandram .
Thereafter, the appellant entered the house of Durga Banchhor with a blood stained knife and assaulted Meera Banchhor and inflicted grievous injuries.
The appellant caused fatal injuries to Anandram, Ratna Sahu and Firanteen Bai with a knife.
The way the appellant also picked and chose the people indicated that the act was pre meditated.
The Court took the view that this is a case of the rarest of the rare category.
The appellant has challenged both the companyviction and the sentence.
And since the appellant exhibited cruelty in the process, the Court held it as a case under the rarest of the rare cases category and the appellant was awarded death sentence.
The brief facts in the present case are as follows.
That the appellant knew what he was doing and the companyse quences thereof and yet he companymitted the offence.
KURIAN, J. Leave granted.
These appeals are filed against the order of the High Court of Chhattisgarh dated 11.04.2014 companyfirming the death sentence awarded to the appellant by the Sessions Judge, Durg vide its judgment in Sessions Trial No.
On 19.10.2011, it is alleged that the appellant entered the house of Anandram Sahu, Firanteen Bai wife of Anandram Sahu and Smt.
