3 to 5 sustained grievous injuries.
The factual position in a nutshell is as follows On 23.7.1996 at about 11 a.m. the revision petitioner accused being the driver of a lorry bearing No.
JMFC, Hassan.
Therefore, the accused was charge sheeted for offences punishable under Sections 279, 337 and 304 A of IPC.
The High Court did number find any substance and dismissed the revision petition.
KL13 4363, was proceeding on Hassan Arsikere Road, near Sankenahalli gate and drove the same in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against a tree, which was by the side of the road and caused death of Shivanna, Bililyamma, Basheer and caused bleeding injuries to C.Ws.
3 to 5, who were travelling in the said lorry sitting in the cabin.
Two of them died at the spot and the third person died on the way to the hospital.
In the revision petition filed before the High Court the primary stand was that there was numberrash and negligence involved because the vehicle capsized because of mechanical failure.
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Appellant calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court dismissing the criminal revision filed by the appellant questioning companyrectness of the judgment of learned Second Additional Civil Judge Jr. Dn.
However, in respect of Sections 337 and 304 A IPC the companyviction was maintained along with the sentences imposed.
