1 in C. A. No.
Appeal by special leave from the order dated September 9, 1960, of the Chief Commissioner, Pondicherry in Appeal No.
K. Daphtary, Solicitor General of India, B. R. L. Iyengar and R. N. Sachthey, for respondent No.
1 in W. I,.
The judgment of the Court was delivered by WANCHOO, J. The appeal and the writ petition arise out of the same order of the Chief Commissioner of Pondicherry acting as the appellate authority under the Motor Vehicles Act and will be dealt with together.
The petitioner is one of fourteen persons who had applied for a stage carriage permit before the State Transport Authority, Pondicherry.
The State Transport Authority companysidered various factors one of which was that Perumal Padayatchi was a native of Pondicherry and taking all the factors into account, the permit was granted to Perumal Padayatchi.
CIVIL APPELLATE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
569/61 .
Mahalinga Iyer, for respondent No.
2 in C.A.569/61 .
347 of 1960.
WITH Writ Petition No.
The petitioners application was rejected and the permit was granted to Perumal Padayatchi, one of the respondents before us.
Petition tinder Art.
The petitioner went in appeal before the Appellate Authority, who is the Chief Commissioner of Pondicherry.
The Appellate Authority dismissed the appeal and observed that even if it were companyceded.
347/60 .
C. Chatterjee, R. K. Garg and S. C. Agarwala, for the petitioner and the intervener.
K. Daphtary, Solicitor General of India, B. R. L. Iyengar and R. N. Sachthey, for respondent No.
569 of 1961.
94 of 1960.
347/60 .
Thiagarajan, for respondent No.
January 22.
3 in W. P. No.
