The appellant came to her and proposed for sexual intercourse.
The victim protested and told that she will inform her mother in respect thereof.
After the return from the said field she has narrated the incident to the brothers and their wives.
On companypletion of investigation the charge sheet was placed.
Prosecution version as unfolded during trial is as follows Victim PW 1 had gone in the field near Makararbandh to bring green grass and after companylecting the green grass she was on her way back to her home.
The appellant felled her on the ground and removed her undergarment and ravished her.
She saw blood oozing from her private part which has besmeared her undergarment.
In order to establish the accusations the prosecution examined 10 witnesses.
According to him, a false case was posed at the instance of Rambhan Singh, Sarpanch PW 3 .
The genital of the appellant had penetrated in her genital which gave immense pain to her and, thereafter, the appellant left her.
5881 of 2006 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
She was crying in pain and at this the appellant had stuffed her mouth by clothes.
Accused faced trial.
The accused pleaded innocence and false implication.
The appellant induced her number to say so to her mother as he will provide Rs.10/ to her.
Arising out of SLP Crl.
Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur, dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment of the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Satna.
Appellant was found guilty of offences punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in short the IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for seven years.
