provided she was a limited owner.
293 and 361 of 1972.
From the Judgment and Order dated 17.3.1978 of the Bombay High Court in Second Appeal Nos.
2486 87 N of 1978.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.
Shorn of details, and various issues raised in the suits, suffice it to mention that even though the trial companyrt found the gift deed to have been duly attested and executed after obtaining permission from the appropriate authority the claim of appellant, for permanent injunction, was decreed number on Section 14 of the Act as the widow who had executed the gift deed in 1954 was, incompetent to alienate widows estate by gift permanently under Hindu Law but on adverse possession and estoppel.
Padumanabhan, Amicus Curiae, R.A. Perumal and G. Narasimhulu for the Respondents.
H. Parekh for the Appellant.
The appellate companyrt while affirming the finding on section 14 of the Act allowed the appeal and dismissed the suit as adverse possession against the widow is number adverse against reversioners, and the next reversioner is entitled to recover the possession of the property or his share in it within 12 years from the date of the death of the widow.
A full bench of the Delhi High Court in Smt.
