He initially had verified the lists and thereafter made spot verification that the basis.
Hence this appeal.
This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court made on September 7, 1983 in W.P. No.3038 of 1983.
This report of the total number of respective unions was accepted by the Industrial Court and upheld numberdoubt number by a very reasoned order, by the summary order.
The appellant had challenged the procedure adopted by the investigating officer under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practice Act, 1971 1 of 1971 for short, MRTUPULP Act .
The appellant is a rival trade union under M s. Chemicals Fibers of India Ltd. formerly ICI India Ltd The Industrial Court in the order had pointed out that the total employees as on June 15, 1981 were 811 and the respondent union had a strength of 448 as against the appellant rival union having strength of Thus it was held to be a recognized union.
Shri Kailash Vasdev, learned companynsel for the appellant, companytended that the Investigating Officer was number justified in law in companyducting spot verification and calling employees either by alternate number and verifying the same and that the procedure, therefore, was clearly illegal.
