The trial companyrt held that the evidence of P.Ws 1 and 2 deserved to be accepted particularly when it was companyroborated by the evidence of W. 3 who was an independent witness.
His companyviction was based upon the evidence of P.Ws 1 and 2 who were accompanying t he deceased and P.W. 3 who had seen the deceased and P.Ws 1 and 2 going together on the road.
NANAVATI, J. The appellant was companyvicted by the trial companyrt for causing death of one Sanjeevan.
