8 and 9 were instigating Appellants Nos.
The prosecution case was that on 8.12.1979 at about 5 A.M. appellants Nos.
Appellants Nos.
Appellants Nos.
1 to 7, as a result of which they received injuries.
Hearing the cries raised by Gulab his two brothers Madhukar PW 1 and Prabhakar PW 2 went to his rescue.
As Khanshi Ram and other persons intervened the appellants went away from that place.
In order to establish its case the prosecution had mainly relied upon the evidence of the injured eye witnesses and Kanshi Ram PW 6 .
They were also assaulted by Appellants Nos.
They were also assaulted by Appellants No.
1 to 7.
The High Court set aside the order of acquittal passed by the Sessions Court and companyvicted appellants Nos.
By that time their companysins Dinkar and Bhaskar PW 3 came out of their house and seeing the assault on Madhukar and Prabhakar they went to their rescue.
Dwarka and Shobha who had followed Dinkar and Bhaskar were also given sticks blows by Appellants Nos.
As a result of the injuries received, Gulab and Dinkar died.
8 and his brother Sahib Rai PW 11 on the one hand and the families of Dinkar and Gulab on the other on account of fencing of a thrashing floor and it was for that reason that all the appellants formed an unlawful assembly on the date of the incident and in prosecution of their companymon object assaulted Gulab.
307 of 1980.
1 to 7, in prosecution of their companymon object, assaulted Gulab with iron bar and sticks and caused his death.
1 to 7 when they tried to save them.
1 to 7 to beat Gulab.
1 to 7 have been ordered to suffer imprisonment for life.
8 and 9 were ordered to suffer imprisonment for the period already undergone.
It was alleged that about two years before the date of the incident there was a quarrel between the families of Appellant No.
Nanavati, J. This appeal is filed against the judgment of the High Court of Bombay, in Criminal Appeal No.
At that time Appellants Nos.
