The First Appellate Court set aside the judgment of the trial companyrt and allowed the appeal and dismissed the plaintiffs suit, holding that the defendant had acquired title by adverse possession over the property in dispute.
135 of 1982 at Cuddalore which was decreed on 20.8.1984 by the trial companyrt.
5472 5475 OF 2001 O R D E R These appeals are directed against the impugned judgment of the Madras High Court dated 17.8.2000 in Second Appeal Nos.
In that suit the plaintiff alleged that he is the owner of the property in question, and he prayed for declaration of his title and for a decree of possession against the defendant.
Against the judgment and decree of the trial companyrt the appellant herein filed an appeal which was allowed by the Additional Sub ordinate Judge, Cuddalore on 30.12.1985.
Against the aforesaid decision the plaintiff respondent herein , filed a second appeal which was allowed by the High Court by the impugned judgment dated 17.8.2000.
The respondent in these appeals, Pandurangan filed a suit being Original Suit No.
CIVIL APPEAL NOS.
807 of 1982 OS No.
Heard learned companynsel for the parties and perused the record.
have number been satisfied by the defendant and hence the plaintiffs suit deserves to be decreed, since admittedly the plaintiff was the owner of the property in dispute.
1601 04/1986.
