The jail authorities returned the fire and the petitioner then threw a handgrenade.
ii the petitioner is said to have made another bid on 21.6.
at about 7.45 P.M. the petitioner with this companyleagues killed Shri Aziz in front of the Lucknow District Jail.
259 of 1988.
The petitioner was, however, in custody and moved an application for bail.
PG NO 254 Criminal cases were registered against the petitioner with respect to each of the three incidents but it appears that evidence against the petitioner was number forthcoming, although several persons supported the prosecution version of the third incident dated 27.7.1987 by their statements recorded under Section 161 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
ORIGINAL JURISDICTlON Writ Petition Criminal No.
Datta, Additional Solicitor General and Ms. A. Subhashini for the Petitioner.
This incident seriously disturbed the public order.
The persons who were present there ran away out of fear.
The writ petitioner has by the present application under Article 32 of the Constitution challenged the order of his detention dated 7.
The District Magistrate after companysidering the relevant circumstances came to the companyclusion that the petitioner was likely to be enlarged on bail by the Criminal Court and since he was further of the view that if the petitioner was number detained, he would be indulging in activities prejudicial to the maintenance of public order, the order of detention was made.
Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India .
The details of the panic which struck the locality are mentioned in the grounds.
1987 to kill another person named Aziz who also narrowly escaped and iii on 17.7.
Yogeshwar Prasad and Dalveer Bhandari for the Respondents.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHARMA, J. 1.
On being challenged again, the party hurled bombs and the petitioner indiscriminately fired from his pistol.
