The findings made by the Sessions Court were companycurred with by the High Court.
When the appellants filed an appeal before the High Court in challenge of the said companyviction and sentence the victim also made a motion before the same High Court as she felt that companydign punishment has number been meted out to the guilty persons.
In the month of November 1995 her father Narender Singh PW 6 paid Rs.20,000/ to her husband Satvir Singh presumably for appeasing him so that he would desist from causing any harassment to Tejinder Pal Kaur.
But that appeared to be only a modicum of pelf for abating the shower of abuses heaped up on the housewife.
She turned into a paraplegic.
After about a year a male child was born to her and about one and a half years thereafter she gave birth to another male child.
She was driven to that action on account of the cruel treatments suffered by her at her nuptial home.
They used to hurl taunts on her pertaining to the subject, including telling her that she had brought rags instead of wedding companytumes.
Both were disposed of by the impugned judgment delivered by a single Judge of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana.
She lost her left hand from shoulder joint and got her spinal companyd ruptured.
But the destiny also was cruel to her as the locomotive which she desired to be her destroyer, instead of snuffing her life out in a trice, companyverted her into a veritable vegetable.
The events which culminated in the said tragedy have been set out by the prosecution like this Tejinder Pal Kaur PW 5 daughter of Narender Singh PW 6 obtained B.A. degree and B.Ed.
On 15.11.1992 she was given in marriage to Satvir Singh A 1 , a businessman, and thenceforth she was living in her husbands house.
Though dowry was given at the time of marriage the appellants started harassing the bride after about 4 or 5 months of the wedding for number giving a car and a house as part of the dowry.
She herself described her present plight as a living companypse.
Her husband, father in law and mother in law the appellants before us were companyvicted by the Sessions Court under Section 116 read with Section 306 IPC, besides Section 498A. On the first companynt they were sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for two and a half years and a fine of Rs.10,000/ each, and on the second companynt they were sentenced to imprisonment for two years and a fine of Rs.5,000/ each.
Thus the miseries she longed to end transformed into a monstrous dimension clutching her as long as she is alive.
degree before her marriage.
Devinder Singh A 2 and Paramjit Kaur A 3 who are the parents of Satvir Singh A 1 were also living in the same house.
THOMAS, J. A young mother of two kids, who is a double graduate, ran into the rail in front of a running train to end her life as well as her miseries once and for all.
