The State of Karnataka sanctioned and reimbursed a sum of Rs.39,207/ .
Respondent in the Karnataka case is an officer working in the Office of the Department of Commercial Taxes.
shall be companyntersigned by the Authorised Medical Attendant of Government Hospital on whose advice the treatment outside the State was undertaken.
He underwent Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in the Wockhardt Hospital and Heart Institute having been admitted on 19th June, 2000.
However, because of an emergent situation, he got himself admitted in the Batra Hospital.
As he was number treated by AIIMS, he filed a writ petition in the High Court of Delhi for a direction to admit him therein.
In the month of May, 2003 he again came to Delhi and got himself admitted and treated in Batra Hospital.
Respondent herein is his mother.
He was referred to AIIMS for kidney transplantation by the SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur.
Indisputably, however, the Principal and Controller, SMS Medical College and Hospital, on or about 5th July, 2003, referred him to AIIMS.
Feeling aggrieved, a writ petition was filed which, by reason of the impugned judgment, has been allowed.
2335 OF 2006 Arising out of SLP C No.
Rajasthan case, relates to one Ajay Upadhyay, who was a Judicial officer.
2336 OF 2008 Arising out of SLP C No.
2593 of 2006 WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.
He, therefore, prayed for reimbursement of his medical expenses incurred on that occasion also.
The said writ petition was withdrawn.
Ajay Upadhyay was being treated for renal failure in 1997.
He filed a representation before the Registrar General of the High Court of Rajasthan that on account of the sudden demise of his maternal uncle, he had to go to Delhi and as he fell ill there, went straightaway to Batra Hospital.
He claimed re imbursement thereof.
1387 of 2006 State of Rajasthan and others Appellants Versus Smt.
He had been suffering from some kidney problems.
REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO.
10942 of 2005 and that of the judgment and order dated 4th August, 2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6502 of 2004 respectively.
A sum of Rs.1,50,600/ was said to have been incurred by him by way of medical expenses.
Savitri Upadhyay Respondent B. SINHA, J. Leave granted in both the matters.
Allegedly his case was number referred therefor by the SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur.
Interpretation and or application of Medical Benefit Rules applicable in the State of Karnataka as also in the State of Rajasthan is in question before us in these appeals which arise out of the judgment and order dated 20th June, 2005 passed by a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court in Writ Petition No.
