It was asserted that the suit shop measuring 10 x 15 was bona fide and genuinely required to enable her eldest son to shift the embroidery business because he was under threat of eviction from the rented premises where he was carrying on the embroidery business.
It was the case of the appellant that the eldest son of the appellant was running his business of embroidery in a rented premises measuring 4 x 4 and that her other son was also unemployed.
The appellant is the landlady who filed an eviction petition against the respondent on the ground of bona fide requirement of the suit shop to enable her sons to run embroidery business therein.
The High Court in revision reversed the finding of the trial companyrt and dismissed the eviction petition.
The trial companyrt after recording evidence of the parties allowed the application and directed eviction of the respondent.
