1, in addition to Section 302 was also companyvicted and sentenced for offence punishable under Section 324 IPC by the trial companyrt.
As many as 12 injuries were caused to the deceased Sarwar and he died on the spot.
On appeal the High Court did number find any good reason to interfere with the order of companyviction and sentence passed against the appellants.
The trial companyrt as well as the High Court have placed reliance on the evidence of PW 1 Aslam on all material aspects.
The appellants in this appeal stand companyvicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and were sentenced to imprisonment for life.
The medical evidence also supports the evidence as narrated by PW 1 as regards the incident.
200/ each from Aslam and Sarwar for celebrating ID.
After Aslam was assaulted he ran away from the place of incident and lodged the FIR.
But the recovery, in this case, companypled with the other evidence on record, supports the prosecution case.
The prosecution case, in brief, was that on 26th February, 1995 at about 7.30 p.m. Aslam PW 1 and Sarwar the deceased and the appellants were walking together and when they reached near Ramanandnagar Pulia the appellants demanded Rs.
On registering a case and after investigation both the appellants were charge sheeted.
On being annoyed the appellant No.
100/ each pleading their inability to pay more.
It may be added that there was recovery of two knives from the appellants which were found blood stained.
As to the place of occurrence the trial companyrt has clearly stated that the incident took place behind Praful Talkies.
It may also be numbered that even blood stained earth was also companylected and the same was sent to the forensic science laboratory.
The PW 1 received a serious knife injury.
They offered to pay Rs.
1 stabbed Aslam with knife and thereafter both the appellants started stabbing Sarwar.
Hence these appeals by the appellants.
Consequently their appeals were also dismissed.
The appellant No.
