That special leave petition was filed to challenge the judgment dated 10th May, 2013 of the High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition No.2898/2011 and L.P.A. No.174 of 2012 under which the order passed by the Estate Officer of the appellant, and companyfirmed by the City Civil Court was left undisturbed.
In both these matters undertakings to vacate were given but they were number companyplied with, and therefore the companytempt petition was filed.
The said order dismissed the SLP filed by the respondent, challenging their eviction from the premises occupied by them.
L.GOKHALE, J. This companytempt petition makes a grievance that the respondent N.R.C. Ltd. has number companyplied with the order dated 19th August, 2013 passed by this Court while dismissing their SLP C No.24874 of 2013, and an action be taken against them for companymitting companytempt of the above order passed by this Court.
However, companysidering the number of employees who were engaged in their registered office situated at that place, they were granted time till the end of December, 2014 to vacate the premises, subject to filing the usual undertaking in the Registry of this Court within four weeks from that date, stating that the petitioner will number create any third party rights, all the mesne profits will be paid in the meanwhile, and will peacefully vacate the premises companycerned at the end of December, 2014.
