dated November 19, 1965 of the Calcutta High Court in Matter No.
Certain disputes arose between the parties relating to the supply of goods and the respondent demanded a payment of Rs.
The appellant did number happen to be a member of the Indian Chamber of Commerce, Calcutta, whereas the respondent was a member.
attorney again sought information regarding the names and particulars of the arbitrators but without success.
The appellant maintained that the said goods were number according to the companytract and had been rightly rejected.
The Court at Calcutta alone and numberother companyrt whatsoever shall have jurisdiction to entertain and try suits in respect of any claim or disputes arising out of or under this companytract or in any way relating to the same.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The Registrar sent a reply saying that the names of the arbitrators companystituting the companyrt companyld number be disclosed to the appellant as it was a numbermember.
Ultimately the appellant filed an application under s. 33 of the Act.
Later on a list of the office bearers and companymittee members was sent but according to the appellant the names of the arbitrators were number disclosed.
1658 of 1966.
The dispute having been referred to the Chamber the appellant wrote to the Registrar of the Tribunal of Arbitration of the Chamber of Commerce to intimate the names of the persons companystituting the companyrt to enable the appellant to ascertain whether they were independent and disinterested persons.
In September 1964 the Registrar intimated that the meeting of the companyrt of the arbitrators would be held on September 24, 1964.
25,658.90 as price of the goods alleged to have been supplied.
213 of 1964.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order.
There was further companyrespondence The appellants.
N. Sinha and B.P. Jha, for the respondent.
A companytract was entered into between appellant and the respondent on January 28, 1964 for sale of 200 bags of Cone yarn.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Grover, J. This is an appeal by special leave from a judgment of the Calcutta High Court dismissing a petition filed under s. 33 of the Indian Arbitration Act, hereinafter called the Act.
N. Mukherjee, for the appellant.
The companytract inter alia companytained the following terms and companyditions In case of any dispute arising out of this companytract the matter in dispute shall be referred to the arbitration of the Indian Chamber of Commerce whose decision shall be binding on both the parties.
