Hence, the present appeal.
The reply of the deceased got the accused enraged.
P 1 to P 24 and material objects 1 to 11.
The prosecution in support of its case examined 14 witnesses and got the documents marked Ex.
He asked his daughter PW 6 to keep a watch on the deceased wife.
Thereafter, PW 12 B.V. Chandra Rao, Inspector of Police, Tadepalligudem Circle, inspected the scene of occurrence and seized two pairs of hawai chappals, broken bangles and found the blood stained earth.
Aggrieved against this order, the accused appellant has preferred the present appeal.
The deceased told PW 3 to inform her husband that she would companye sometime later.
The accuseds clothes were stained with blood and he was armed with MO.2 Baditha in his hand.
P 1 before PW 11, A.V.R.P.V. Prasad, Incharge, Police Station, Tanuku.
1000/ .
P 19 in the presence of P.W.9, Bhogaraju Subba Rao, P.W.1 Administrative Officer and other Panch witnesses of the village.
After reaching at the house of the PW 2, the accused dealt blows to the deceased with MO.2 Baditha and killed her.
But his wife did number listen to him.
He also companymunicated to the deceased wife to snap her relationship with PW 2.
He suspected his wifes fidelity because of the illicit intimacy with PW 2 Kokkirigadda Someswara Rao.
PW 1, an Administrative Officer wrote out a report obtained the signature as well as the thumb impression of the accused thereon and produced the same as Ex.
He went to the house of PW 2 and on his way he picked MO.2 Baditha from PW 4 Sambhana Satyanarayana, a carpenter.
Four or five days prior to the incident i.e. on 12th November, 1996, deceased had left the house of the accused and started residing with PW 2.
Necessary panchanama of the deceased body was also prepared in presence of the witnesses.
Later on the accused went to PW 1, Atchuyutharama, Rao, an Administrative Officer of that village at 1.45 P.M. and informed him the circumstances under which he has killed his wife.
On 12th November, 1996, the accused sent a word to his deceased wife through PW 3 Velagada Suramma to return home.
The accused had a daughter by name Namala Venkata Laxmi.
He alongwith his deceased wife and daughter was residing in the house situated at 18th Ward, Old Town, Tanuku.
After companypletion of investigation a charge sheet was filed against the accused under the aforesaid section.
Aggrieved against the companyviction by the trial companyrt, an appeal was preferred by the accused before the High Court and the High Court companyfirmed the companyviction of the accused.
The Sub Inspector of Police, PW 11 received the statement of the accused alongwith the endorsement of PW 1 thereon and registered a case under Section 302, I.P.C. He seized the blood stained shirt and blood stained Baditha from the accused and the same was kept under the companyer of Ex.
Brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that the accused is the husband of Namala Kannamma for short deceased .
PW 3 companymunicated the message to the deceased that her presence was required at her house by her husband.
1000/ .
K. MATHUR, J. The present appeal is directed against an order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Andhra Pradesh in Criminal Appeal No.
