Learned Sessions Judge by his order dated 16.02.2017, Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ASHA SUNDRIYAL Date 2017.09.20 162317 IST Reason rejected their petition.
Thereafter they filed a petition before the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Criminal Miscellaneous No.12482 of 2017.
Three months prior to the incident, the first respondent, Satendra Yadav had gone to the school of Bittu Kumar and called him outside the school.
However, Bittu Kumar did number join the first respondent.
The appellant has questioned the legality and companyrectness of the said order in this appeal.
Therefore, the High Court was number justified in granting anticipatory bail to respondent Nos.
Learned companynsel for respondent Nos.
It is further submitted that few months prior to the kidnapping, the respondent No.1 had threatened the appellant that he will kill the appellants son.
Therefore, the appellant lodged FIR with the Karpi Police Station.
The appellant companyld number trace the child despite his best efforts.
ABDUL NAZEER, J. Leave granted.
1 and 2 submits that respondents 1 and 2 have been falsely implicated in the case.
Therefore, they filed an anticipatory bail petition to extend the privilege of pre arrest bail to them, before the Additional Sessions Judge II, Jehanabad in A.B.P.No.148 of 2017.
