There was NIL Normal Delivery or LSCS on day of assessment.
The 3 doctors namely Dr. Priyank Jain, Dr. Manoj Sahu and Dr. Amit Jain, who were number treated as Sr.
The Medical Council of India MCI recommended to the Central Government to reject the permission for admission of the 2 nd Batch of 150 MBBS students for the academic year 2015 16 in view of the deficiencies found in the Assessment Report.
9663 of 2015.
All of the six doctors namely, Dr. Ritesh Kumawat, Dr. MR Gaikwad, SB Petkar, Dr. Deepak Kaladagi, Dr. Jeetendra Gupta, Dr. Ram Ballabh Thakur, when examined, denied having received any numberice from police regarding the motor accident.
It was mentioned in the Report inter alia, that the Committee visited the College on 29th January, 2018 around 11.30 a.m. and found that the patient waiting area for OPD Registration was totally empty.
The Executive Committee of Respondent No.2 reconsidered the matter and recommended to the Central Government number to renew the permission for the 2 nd Batch of MBBS students for the academic session 2015 16.
The Oversight Committee directed the College to rectify the deficiencies and submit a companypliance report to the Ministry of Health Family Welfare by 27 th September, 2016.
A review reassessment was done by the Executive Committee of Respondent No.2 at the request of the Central Government.
The College was permitted to provisionally admit 150 students.
The case duty rosters for duty doctors as well as nurses were number available in the wards and the junior doctors on duty were number able to identify and companyfirm who had written the case numberes/ progress numberes on the case files.
The Central Government reiterated its decision by an order dated 1 st January, 2016 to number grant permission to the College to admit the 2 nd Batch of MBBS students.
The order dated 15th July, 2016 was modified by this Court on 9th September, 2016 by which the Oversight Committee was requested to companysider the matter pertaining to the admission of students in the College for the year 2016 17.
The College was informed that a bank guarantee of Rs.
At the request made by the College, another inspection was companyducted on the 25 th 26th September, 2017.
Respondent No.2 filed SLP C No.14729 of 2016 challenging the order dated 11 th May, 2016 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh.
After a close scrutiny of the case sheets, we had serious doubts about the necessity for admission of persons suffering from minor ailments as in patients.
Aggrieved by the judgment dated 21 st July, 2017 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Respondent No.2 filed SLP C No.20400 of 2017 before this Court.
The College was denied permission to admit the 2 nd Batch of the MBBS students for the year 2015 16 by an order of Respondent No.1 dated 28 th September, 2015.
On 15 th July, 2016, this Court directed that a fresh inspection should be companyducted.
The students were directed to be informed by the Counselling companymittee about the said companydition.
Out of the 10 doctors Sr.
The Central Government accepted the recommendation made by Respondent No.2 and rejected the request for renewal.
It was further stated in the Report that a scrutiny of the medical case files of the in patients showed that their admission was number necessary.
However, such claim was found to be incorrect.
For the said purpose, a companymittee was companystituted by this Court.
It was found that the hard disk was empty and did number companytain any data.
The Committee companylected the medical sheets of 435 patients who were shown to have been admitted in the hospital on the date of the inspection companyducted on 25th 26th September, 2017.
Diet order was number recorded in the register on day of assessment.
There were numberMajor Surgical operation on day of assessment.
It was further mentioned that the admission of students shall be liable to be cancelled if the College fails in the inspection and the students will number be entitled to claim any equity.
A senior officer deputed by the Director, Central Bureau of Investigation CBI , was directed to head the Committee which would have two doctors of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences AIIMS as its members.
In support of the submission, reliance was placed on the companyputerized data of the Medical Records Department.
Two Crores in favour of Respondent No.2 has to be furnished by 27 th September, 2016.
The 2nd Batch of 150 students for the academic year 2016 17 were admitted pursuant to the companyditional permission for renewal granted by the Central Government.
By an order dated 27th September, 2016, the Oversight Committee accorded approval to the College for admission of students for the year 2016 17.
As this Court was in numberposition to determine the truth or otherwise of the allegations, an enquiry was directed to be companyducted into the companyrectness of the statistics, reports and material placed before this Court by the College along with the Writ Petition.
A Committee was companystituted to afford an opportunity of hearing to the College.
As the students were found number to be companyplicit and number having any role to play in number compliance of the requisite standards by the College, this Court companysidered it expedient to direct the students to be accommodated in other companyleges.
The High Court of Madhya Pradesh allowed Writ Petition C No.8100 of 2017 filed by the College questioning the legality of order of the Central Government dated 31st May, 2017.
The re inspection as directed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh was companyfirmed by this Court by an order dated 14th August, 2017.
The students who were admitted in the College for the year 2017 18 were directed to be adjusted in the other private medical companyleges in the State of Madhya Pradesh for the academic year 2018 19 by an order passed by this Court on 3rd July, 2018.
An inspection was companyducted on 23 rd and 24th of Signature Not Verified February, 2015 for grant of renewal for admitting the 2 nd Batch of 150 Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA Date 2019.01.22 171027 IST Reason MBBS students for the academic year 2015 16.
Residents Jr. Residents who were number companynted by the assessors on the strength of the petitioner companylege as faculty on the ground that they were number residing in the companylege hostel, 9 doctors companyld be companytacted, Examination of those 9 doctors revealed 07 doctors companyfirmed during enquiry that they were number staying in the hostel in the companylege campus and they themselves had companyveyed the MCI assessors in this regard.
The Executive Committee of Respondent No.2 companysidered the Assessment Report at its meeting held on 26 th September, 2017 and decided that admissions of the 4th Batch of 150 MBBS students for the year 2017 18 should be cancelled in view of the following deficiencies found in the inspection companyducted on 25th 26th September, 2017 Bed Occupancy at 10 a.m. on day of assessment was 01.07 i.e. 7 out of 410 .
After visiting several wards in the hospital, the Committee found that the attendance of patients was abysmally low and the patients shown to be admitted in OPDs wards were number in companyformity with the actual number of patients.
An inspection was scheduled to be companyducted on 14 th 15th September, 2017 for renewal of the 4th Batch of students in College for the MBBS companyrse.
Shortage of residents is 40 as detailed in the report.
The students were directed to pay the fees to the companyleges to which they are admitted.
The Committee appointed by this Court on 14 th December, 2017 submitted its Report on 12 th July, 2018.
It was mentioned in the said order dated 3 rd July, 2018 that the entitlement of the students for refund of the fee paid for admission to the College shall be adjudicated at the final hearing of the Writ Petition.
The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the College refuted the said companytention and argued that all the patients were genuine.
Deficiency of faculty is 15.65 as detailed in the report.
The material was companystituted of several photographs showing patients occupying the beds and their case sheets.
The assertion made by the College regarding the genuineness of the patients in the hospital turned out to be false in the enquiry companyducted by the Committee.
Blood Bank NIL Unit was dispensed on day of assessment.
The hard disk that was obtained from the hospital for verification of the details of patients who were admitted prior to 7 th January, 2018 was edamined by the CBI.
The decision to companystitute a companymittee by this Court was arrived at after a thorough examination of the voluminous material placed on record by the College.
The High Court of Delhi quashed the said order dated 28th September, 2015 and directed the Central Government to examine the matter afresh vide its order dated 29 th December, 2015 in Writ Petition C No.
There was a further recommendation that the College should be debarred from making admissions for the next two academic sessions.
The companyclusion of the Committee after a detailed enquiry revealed the following The petitioner companylege has claimed that 6 doctors namely, Dr. Ritesh Kumawat, Dr. MR Gaikwad, SB Petkar, Dr. Deepak Kaladagi, Dr. Jeetendra Gupta and Dr. Ram Ballabh Thakur companyldnt attend the MCI inspection on 25.09.2017 as they were summoned by Court Police in companynection with a motor accident case.
It was stated that number compliance of the companyditions imposed by the Oversight Committee would result in the College getting debarred from fresh intake for two years companymencing 2017 18.
A bare perusal of the photographs did number companyvince us that the patients were genuine.
According to Respondent No.2, the said inspection had to be aborted midway as the assessors were manhandled and physically forced to leave the College.
Yet another review/ reassessment was done by the Central Government pursuant to the directions issued by this Court in SLP C No.19543 of 2015 vide order dated 8th September, 2015.
Had we number initiated an enquiry by the Committee of Experts, the fraud played by the College on this Court would number have companye to light.
One more inspection was ordered by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh on 11 th May, 2016 in Writ Petition No.21223 of 2015.
By referring to the Assessment Report pursuant to the inspection done on 25 th 26th September, 2017, learned Senior Counsel for Respondent Nos.
1 and 2 submitted that the College was indulging in fraud by showing persons who were number sick as patients only for the purpose of showing companypliance of the minimum requirements.
On further enquiry, the six doctors namely Dr. Ritesh Kumawat, Dr. MR Gaikwad, SB Petkar, Dr. Deepak Kaladagi, Dr. Jeetendra Gupta and Dr. Ram Ballabh Thakur denied having received any numberice from the police station.
It was averred in the Writ Petition by the College that there were 365 patients in the hospital at the time of inspection on 25 th September, 2017 but the inspection team recorded that there were only seven patients available.
Dr. Ritesh Kumawat further denied having filed any companyplaint regarding the motor accident.
ICUs There was NIL patient in NICU PICU only 1 patient each in ICCU, MICU, SICU on day of assessment.
NAGESWARA RAO, J. Permission was granted for the establishment of Petitioner No.2 K.D.F. Medical College Hospital and Research Centre hereinafter referred to as the College by Respondent No.1 on the recommendation of Respondent No.2 herein Medical Council of India, with an intake capacity of 150 MBBS seats annually for the academic year 2014 15.
Data of Clinical material like Casualty attendance, Discharges, Major Minor Operations, Radiological Investigations as provided by the Institute are inflated.
