In spite of having been granted opportunity to discharge their burden of proof by secondary evidence, it was number discharged by them.
He joined the respondent institution in the year 1988.
The trainees are also provided free lodge and boarding.
It is a subsidiary to Indian Farmers Fertilizers Corporation.
CIVIL APPEAL NO 1769 OF 2008 Arising out of SLP C No.
Appellants examined themselves before the Labour Court.
By reason of the impugned judgment, the High Court set aside the award of the Labour Court inter alia opining that the burden of proof had wrongly been placed on the respondent, It was held It has companysistently number been held by the companyrt that the burden of proof is on the employee who claims relief.
20378 of 2005 B. SINHA, J. Leave granted.
Respondent carries out its function under a deed of trust.
Before the learned Labour Court, both parties adduced their respective evidences.
It is admitted to the parties that the workmen were daily wagers.
Daily wagers are appointed for the said purposes.
They produced provident fund receipts for the years 1992 93 and 1994 95.
The employment of daily wagers is a needbased one.
Some documents to show that the appellants have been working for a long time were called for from the respondents.
They raised an industrial dispute.
Respondent having aggrieved by and dissatisfied therewith filed a Writ Petition before the Allahabad High Court.
The State of U.P. in exercise of its power under the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the dispute for adjudication before the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, U.P. Allahabad.
Their services were number being taken from 28.12.1996.
For imparting training, fees is number charged from the trainees.
Respondent produced only Attendance Register for December, 1996 and attendance sheet for the year 1997.
One Kamla Pati Dubey was examined on behalf of the respondent.
It imparts training to farmers for facilitating improved agricultural production.
Appellants herein and in particular, some of them, claimed to have been working with the respondent institute for a long time.
Respondent is a research institute.
They brought on records various documents to show that even Provident Fund used to be deducted from their salary.
