That order required the appellant to be present in the companyrt on November 4, 1996.
Feeling aggrieved, they preferred Special Leave Petition No.2145 of 1995 before this companyrt which was also dismissed on July 14, 1995.
Thereafter, the appellant challenged the said summoning order of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate in revision in the companyrt of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jamnagar, in Criminal Revision Petition No.10 of 1997.
By order under appeal, the High Court dismissed the petition.
On dismissal of that petition, he filed Special Criminal Application No.266 of 1998 in the High Court of Gujarat.
Criminal Application No.580 of 1995 before the High Court which was dismissed on February 28, 1995.
Though the companyplaint was filed under Sections 406, 416,420,34 and 114 of IPC, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate issued summoning order only under Section 406 IPC on October 17, 1994.
The appellant has thus challenged that order of the High Court in this appeal.
Two of the accused, No.1 and No.2 challenged the summoning order by filing Misc.
The High Court in the order under appeal, numbered that it was only after two years in fact it was more than three years of dismissal of challenge by accused Nos.1 and 2 against the summoning order by this companyrt, the appellant filed the revision before the Additional Sessions Judge.
The appellant is accused No.4 in Criminal Case No.6096 of 1994 in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamnagar.
SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI,J. Leave is granted.
The second respondent preferred a companyplaint against the appellant and three others on October 12, 1994.
