Investigation was taken up and after investigation chargesheet was filed.
On 17th November 1980 City Civil Courts Act came into force. ,
The facts which gave rise to these appeals were that about 2 A.M. on 9th April 1980 it was alleged that Kuppuswa my the present respondent stabbed Narayanaswamy who expired at 11 P.M., and also Ramu who expired at 8.05 P.M. and Sunil Kumar, Sub Inspector of Police, who expired at 2.30 A.M. on the next day.
332 of the Indian Penal Code and sentence of rigorous imprisonment of one year.
The High Court has also referred to a Notification issued on 30th January 1981 by the Registrar of Bangalore City Civil Courts saying that Sessions cases and other matters pending before the II, III and VI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judges are to be tried by them and on 12th Jan. 1981 the III Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore City recorded the evidence in the case.
PW 1 Ulaga nathan, who was the Senior Trains Clerk, went and lodged the First Information Report Ex.
215 of 1981.
302 for which after trial the respondent Kuppuswamy was sentenced to death and also for offence under Sec.
Kuppuswamys matter also came before the High Court apart from his appeal also by reference.
From the Judgment and Order dated 27.7.1981 of the Karnataka High Court in Crl.
35 of 1980 in re spect of an offence under Sec.
Against the companyviction and sentences appeal were preferred before Honble the High Court.
Monthly statements of cases wherein the accused persons were in custody were prepared and it appears that these statements also reached the High Court and have been made use of by the learned Judges in disposing of these appeals.
823 Of 1981 Etc.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
Sunil Kumar and his police party happened to go there in a van on hearing galata in the railway platform of the Cantonment railway station, Bangalore, and when Sunil Kumar caught hold of the wrist of the accused respondent.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by, OZA, J. These appeals have been preferred by the State of Karnataka against the judgment of the High Court of Karnataka setting aside companyviction of the respondents and remanding the cases before the Sessions Court for retrial.
B. Lal Amicus Curiae K.R. Nagaraja for the Respondents.
The respondents were companymitted for trial to the Sessions Judge, Metropolitan Area, Bangalore City in number of Ses sions cases including Sessions Case No.
he somehow managed to slip out and stabbed him.
Veerappa for the Appellant.
It is number necessary for us to go into these question as question involved in these appeals is merely a technical question pertaining to procedure and does number pertain to the merits of the matter.
The accused persons were companymitted to the Sessions Court, Metropolitan Area, Bangalore City and it appears that the Principal Sessions Judge Metropolitan Area, made over the Sessions case in exercise of his powers under Section 194 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to II Additional Sessions Judge, Metropolitan Area, Bangalore City who framed charges on 21.8.80 and recorded to plea of the accused persons.
