As is evident from the Report those two classes were those falling under Rules 1 and 2 of Rules of Age of retirement for whom the age of retirement was 60 years and those falling under Rule 3 for whom the age of retirement was 58 years, depending on the date of recruitment of promotion being prior to or after the appointed day i.e. 19th July, 1969.
3197 of 1986, respectively.
3532 of 1988 and Miscellaneous Petition No.
The High Court by a companymon judgment dated 17 1 1989 dismissed the writ petitions of the appellants being Miscellaneous Petition No.
From the Judgment and Order dated 17.1.89 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in M.P. No.
While these were put to challenge, it was felt by this Court on 26.2.1992 that the State Bank of India, though originally number a respondent before the High Court, should be added as a party since the impugned Regulation 19 had been framed by the Central Board of Directors of the State Bank of India under the powers companyferred on it by Section 63 of the Act.
WITH Civil Appeal No.
The respective appellants moved the High Court of Madhya Pradesh under Article 226 of the Constitution claiming inter alia that Regulation 19 companyld number be invoked in their cases and, if it all it companyld, then that was ultra vires and in exercise of excessive delegation of legislative powers made over to the State Bank of India under section 63 of the Act.
1187 of 1985, Miscellaneous Petition No.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
C. Bhandare, S.K Jain and Ms. Pratibha Jain for the Appellants.
128 of 1993.
129 of 1993.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by PUNCHHI, J. Special leave granted in these three companynected petitions.
They were initially in the employment of the Bank of Indore Limited which ceased to exist with effect from 1.1.1960 and became a subsidiary bank known as the State Bank of Indore, in the wake of the State Bank of India Subsidiary Banks Act, 1959 hereafter referred to as the Act .
Each appellant in these appeals was an employee of the State bank of Indore a subsidiary bank of the State Bank of India , the first respondent in these appeals.
WITH Civil Appeal No.
K. Sanghi A.V. Rangam and A. Ranganadhan for the Respon dents.
The existing employees of the kind of the appellants claimed to have certain service rights protected under section 11 of the aforesaid Act inclusive of the right to companytinue till the age of 58 years.
127 of 1993.
The subsidiary bank claims to have exercised powers under Regulation 19 1 of the State Bank of Indore officers Service Regulations, 1979 hereafter referred to as the Regulations , in taking such steps.
1187 of 1985.
They were however made to retire before attaining the age of 58 years on different dates, but upon companypleting 30 years of actual service.
