This appeal is directed against order dated 4.7.2007 of the learned Single Judge of Allahabad High Court, whereby he declined to interfere with order dated 22nd February, 2007 passed by the Deputy Director Consolidation , who dismissed revision filed by the appellants under section 48 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, but, at the same time, set aside the orders dated 5.6.1984, 23.9.1991 and 14.3.1991 passed by the Consolidation Officer.
Hence, this appeal by special leave.The appellants challenged the appellate order by filing revision under section 48 of the Act.
2/ 2 The appeal preferred by respondent number1 against order dated 23.9.1991 was allowed by the Settlement Officer Consolidation , Mau, vide his order dated 10.8.2005.
The Deputy Director of Consolidation dismissed the revision but, at the same time, set aside the orders dated 5.6.1984, 23.9.1991 and 14.11.1991 passed by the Consolidation Officer and as also the order dated 10.8.2005 passed by the Settlement Officer Consolidation and directed that the disputed land be recorded as Navin Parti.
The appellants challenged that order in writ petition number 29336/2007, which was dismissed by the learned Single Judge.
He set aside order dated 5.6.1984 of the Consolidation Officer and remanded the case to the companycerned Officer with the direction to trace out the file of the case and decide it on merits after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties.
Thereafter, mutation was effected in the name of the appellants on 23.9.1991 and 14.11.1991 by expunging the existing entry of Navin Parti.
The dispute relates to plot number.
170 and 171 situated in village Ludohi, Pargana and Tehsil Ghosi, District Mau, U.P. By an order dated 5.6.1984, the Consolidation Officer directed that the disputed plots be recorded as abadi samil jot in the names of the appellants.
Leave granted.
