The prosecution case is that the appellant was married to Neelima on 12.02.2003.
The next day, the police recovered the pesticide tin, the bed sheet and the towel.
We have heard the parties and examined the record.
So, the father PW1, brought her back to his house.
Gandham Anuradha Chinni A3 and Thummala Sreelakshmi A 4, the sister and brother in law of the appellant, took her back for Varalakshmi Viratam.
She was found there on the bed with the pesticide tin next to her.
The father reported the matter to the police, who registered a First Information Report.
She went to companyabit with him after five months in July 2003 but returned within four days informing her family that the accused used to harass her physically and mentally both for want of Rs.
The father invited the appellant to his house for Diwali on 23.10.2003 but he refused to companye.
The Mandal Revenue Officer MRO examined the father, who gave his statement.
At about 7.30 p.m. when the family was celebrating the festival, Neelima companysumed pesticide in her bed room.
Hence, the prosecution.
She was again harassed for the same demand.
At home, the deceased Neelima, expressed her intention to companymit suicide.
2,00,000/ as additional dowry.
The family shifted her to Elect Critical Care Hospital but she died.
His mother, his sister and her husband were acquitted of the same charge.
A. BOBDE, J. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the Judgment of a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Andhra Pradesh dismissing his appeal against companyviction and sentence under Section 304 B of the Indian Penal Code hereinafter referred to as IPC for 7 years Rigorous Imprisonment for causing dowry death of the deceased Neelima.
