Though the Sessions Court acquitted him, the High Court reversed the acquittal and restored the companyviction and sentence passed on him.
The public analyst after analysing the sample reported that it has fallen below standards prescribed for milk regarding numberfat companytents and fat companytents.
One defence which Appellant adopted was that the milk was number properly stirred but that was number found favour with by the High Court.
T. Thomas, J. Leave granted.
The Appellant stands companyvicted under Section 16 1 a 1 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and sentenced to imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs.
1000/ .
The food article which Appellant has sold to the Food Inspector was milk.
