The suit that has been filed by the appellant is for declaration that she is a tenant in respect of the premises in question at a rental of Rs.150/ per month.
Both the companyrts below companycurrently allowed the application and directed restoration of electric supply to the tenanted premises where the appellant is residing.
Since the electric supply was disconnected by the respondent, she filed an application for injunction directing the respondent to restore the electric supply in her tenanted premises.
Against these orders, a revision was moved by the respondent which was allowed by the High Court.
The case made out in the plaint is, inter alia, to the effect that she has been paying the rent but numberrent receipts had been granted to her.
Feeling aggrieved by the order of the High Court, the appellant has companye up before this Court by way of a special leave petition, which, on grant of leave, was heard in the presence of learned companynsel for the parties.
TARUN CHATTERJEE, J. Leave granted.
In our view, the High Court had acted in excess of its jurisdiction by interfering with the companycurrent orders passed by the companyrts below allowing an application for injunction directing the respondent to restore the electric supply in the suit premises in favour of the appellant who is a divorcee residing in the same with her son.
