From the Judgment and order dated 14.3.1986 of the Delhi High Court in F.A.O. O.S. No.
Hence this appeal.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DUTT, J. Special leave is granted.
Rajinder Sachar, K.C. Dua and G.S. Sistan for the Respondents.
It was companytended by them that the relief sought for in the suit had been grossly undervalued and the Court should reject the plaint under order VII, Rule 11 b of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The learned Single Judge of the High Court overruled the said preliminary objection and held that the suit was number undervalued.
The suit has been valued for the purpose of jurisdiction at Rs.25 lakhs and at Rs.500 for the purpose of companyrt fee.
The respondent, who is the plaintiff, has filed a suit against the appellants, inter alia, for dissolution of partnership and for accounts.
On appeal by the appellants, a Division Bench of the High Court took the same view as that of the learned Single Judge.
2137 of 1988.
The appellants filed an application wherein a preliminary objection was raised as to the valuation of the suit.
65 of 1986.
Soli J. Sorabjee, S.K. Mehta, P.H. Parekh and M.K.S. Menon for the Appellants.
