The Labour Court found that the enquiry was number done properly and there was numberproof to the effect that the respondent had caused embezzlement and the respondent was ordered to be reinstated in service with full back wages.
The companynsel for the appellant points out that in the award passed by the Labour Court, it is number stated that the respondent had number companymitted any irregularity rather, the charges were number proved by producing satisfactory evidence.
The enquiry officer found him guilty of the charges and he was thereafter removed from service.
Series of charges were framed against him alleging that he had caused embezzlement of money of the Society.
The award passed by the Labour Court was challenged by the appellant Society before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana.
When the matter was admitted, the Division Bench was pleased to issue numberice only regarding the question of payment of back wages to the respondent.
The award of the Labour Court directing the appellant to reinstate the respondent has thus become final.
As regards this allegation, the respondent in his reply stated that this amount was given to him as advance by the Society pursuant to a resolution passed by it.
The respondent herein was the Secretary to the Society, Hissar Central Co operative Bank.
The matter by way of reference reached the Labour Court where the dismissal of the respondent from the Society was challenged.
