The petitioners appeal against that order to the Assistant Settlement Commissioner has been dismissed, its revision petition to the Deputy Chief Settlement Commissioner has also been dismissed and lastly, its application under section 33 of the Act has also been dismissed by the Central Government.
The petitioners case is that though it accepted the offer of the Government to purchase the plot on the terms stipulated by the Rehabilitation Department, the Department has number sold the same by public auction on June 19, 1963, and purchased by the 4th respondent.
85/D/9 R/347, dated March 30, 1964, suffers from any error of law apparent on the face of the record.
Industrial Area, Kirtinagar, New Delhi, was allotted to the petitioner by the Rehabilitation Department in March.
In this case, I am principally companycerned with the question, whether the order of the 2nd respondent made in No.
The petitioners objection to the sale of that property has been overruled by the Managing Officer.
The partners of that firm are evacuees horn an area, which number forms a part of West Pakistan.
Plot No.
Hence this petition.
The petitioner is a partnership firm.
