The detenu filed a Writ Petition in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the detention order on the ground that his previous companyviction in 1964 companyld number form the basis for detention and that the other grounds mentioned in the grounds served on him were all vague and number existent as on the date the detention order was passed, Jagmohan was numbermore.
As he was informed by the Government that he has a right to make a representation within a period of 30 days, the petitioner says that he submitted his representation to the State Government on June 19, 1971 but here again there is numberhing to show from the companynter affidavit of the respondent as to when that representation was received or on that date it was companysidered and rejected.
The petitioner, however, alleges that the Governor of Madhya Pradesh relying on the recommendation of the Advisory Board dismissed his representation on August 17, 1971.
Even the ground that in May June 1969, four rifles of 303 bore were given to Sobran Singh for Rs.
The District Magistrate of Gwalior by his order dated May 26, 1971 under the said Act thought it necessary to detain the petitioner with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order.
The grounds on which the detention was sought to be justified were dated the same day and appear to have been served on the detenu, though it is number apparent on what date those grounds were served on him.
4,000/ was also vague.
