Present Honable Mr. Justice K. Ramaswamy Honable Mr. Justice D.P. Wadhwa N. Padmanabhan, Sr.
Rafeeq filed O.S. No.
Ms. Puja Anand and Ms. Revathy Raghavan, Advs.
Therein, he stated that he entered into an agreement of lease on March 11, 1987.
He claimed injunction on the basis of the directions issued by this Court.Further fresh deed was executed on April 30, 1990.
with him for the appellant Harish Salve, Sr.
and A.V. Rangam, Adv.
Notice on the limited question of companypensation to the respondents in respect of the building in question, was issued on August 6, 1996, on the premise that the appellant himself was in possession of the building.
In the companynter affidavit filed by the respondents, it is stated that the appellant has let out the building to one Jasmine Electricals on a monthly rent of Rs.1000/ and that they have been in possession and enjoyment of there premises.
We have heard learned companynsel on both sides.
with him for the Respondents.
The admission thereby that he has let out the premises gets proved.
6/97 in the Court of the District Munsif of Cuddalore for injunction against the owner.
O R D E R The following order of the Court was delivered Leave granted.
In the rejoinder, it is admitted by the appellant in paragraph 8 which reads as under It is true that I had let out to one Jasmine Electricals, but that is only from 1993 and number earlier.
It is totally incorrect to state that I have been realising the rental income from the property since 1968.
One Mohd.
