1 of Writ Petition No.
The relief in this writ petition squarely companyers relief No.
215 of 1989.
590/87 sought two reliefs, namely, i restora tion of the companymuted portion of the pension, and ii en hancement of pension or par with the pensioners of the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, for short HPCL.
This Court accepted the companytentions of the petitioners and ordered a seizeable hike in the pension.
2 to 5 and others similarly situated upon the expiry of 12 1/2 years from date of retirement in case of those retired prior to April 1985 and after 11 1/3 years to those retired prior to April 1, 1985 from their respective dates of retirement.
590/87.
Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.
During the companyrse of hearing, claim for the first relief was given up and submission was companyfined to the second relief.
The order passed by this Court is as recent as May 11, 1988.
S. Gujral, Ms. Kirti Misra and B .B. Sawhney for the Petitioners.
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.
They claim that though in their previous Writ Petition No.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAMASWAMY, J. This writ petition under Art.
B. Pari, O.C. Mathur, Ms. Meera and S. Sukumaran for the Respondents.
32 filed on behalf of about 450 erstwhile employees of M s. Burmah Shell retired between May 1, 1979 and December 1984, is for a mandamus or direction to the respondents to restore full pension which had been companymuted to the petitioner Nos.
Consideration of the present relief had been left over for a later period.
590/87 disposed of by a Division Bench of this Court on May 11, 1988 of which one of us Ranganath Misra, J. was a member, a hike in the pension effective from May 1, 1988 was granted.
Admittedly, the petitioners in Writ Petition No.
