Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by MAHABIR SINGH Date 2018.10.09 174117 IST Reason In the writ petition filed by the appellant Corporation, the order of the Industrial Tribunal was affirmed by the Single Judge including the back wages of 40.
In further appeal, the Division Bench of the High Court also upheld the order of the Single Judge as well as the Industrial Tribunal holding that there was number compliance of Section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act.
By the same order, this Court has directed that the respondent shall be reinstated forthwith and be paid all back wages from 10th March, 2015.
His services were terminated in the year 1998.
When the matter came up for hearing before this Court on 2nd January, 2017, numberice was issued limited to the question of payment of 40 back wages.
In the industrial dispute raised by the respondent workman, the Industrial Tribunal held that the provisions of Section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act has number been companyplied with and on that ground the order of termination was set aside by the Industrial Tribunal and the respondent was directed to be reinstated with companytinuity of service along with 40 back wages.
BANUMATHI, J. Leave granted.
The respondent Kulwant Singh was employed as a daily wager helper from April 1997 to April 1998 in the companystruction work with the appellant Punjab State Power Supply Corporation Limited.
