591 of 1987, 903 of 1988, 620 of 1991 and 181 of 1987.
In case of others wherein it was indicated that their services had been terminated on disciplinary grounds, but without holding an enquiry, it was held that the same was number permissible as such orders would cast a stigma on the career of the appellants.
4570 of 1996, there are 28 appellants and they are Nepali nationals recruited in Nepal on different dates.
4569 of 1996, there are three appellants and they were recruited by the Ministry of Defence, Government of India in Nepal and posted in the Pension Pay Office at Pokhran.
c the terms and companyditions of service of the members of the category.
3, 8 years of service in their respective offices.
Writ petitions had been preferred before this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution and on the establishment of the Central Administrative Tribunal, this Court transferred these petitions for its companysideration by an order made on 3rd November, 1992 in W.P. No.
The Tribunal based its decision on the enunciation of law made by this Court in Air India vs. Nergesh Meerza AIR 1981 SC 1829, which is as follows a the nature, the mode and the manner of recruitment of a particular category from the very start.
In Civil Appeal No.
Thus at the time of filing of these appeals, appellant No.
1 had put in 20 years service, appellant No.
In Civil Appeal No.
They claim for companyfirmation in their posts and for parity in emoluments, paid to their companyterparts designated as India Based Employees inasmuch as both of them were performing identical works and employed in the same establishment.
3 on 2.9.1985.
2 was appointed on 21.10.1964 and appellant No.
The appellants herein are were employed in the pension paying offices attached to the respective Ministries in the Embassy of India at Nepal.
4569 of 1996, 4571/1996.
WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS.
While the first appellant was appointed as a lower division clerk on 24.7.1972, appellant No.
They also seek for identical reliefs as in Civil as in Civil Appeal Nos.
Appellant No.
2, 29 years and appellant No.
b the classifications of the particular category.
4571 of 1996, there are 29 appellants, while appellants 24, 26 and 27 are Indian citizens rest of them are nepali nationals.
While in the case of respondents Nos.
e the special attributes that the particular category possess which are number to be found in other classes, and the like.
1,2 and 4, it was numbericed that the orders of termination merely stated that their services had been terminated with effect from 31.12.1986 or 1.1.1987.
4572 of 1996 In this appeal, apart from the claims regarding paying of pay scales and other monetary benefits, the appellants claim for quashing the respective orders made in respect of the appellants terminating their services while the Tribunal reiterated its view on the claim regarding the parity of pay and other emoluments.
d the nature and character of the posts and promotional avenues.
4570 4571/96 4572/1996 J U D G M E N T Rajendra Babu, J. These three sets of appeals arise out of the orders made by the Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench .
In Civil Appeal No.
