In spite of the appellants making repeated representations for regularities, which made them to move the Delhi High Court in W.P. No.
A Review Petition filed by the Union of India was dismissed by this Court on 15.9.87.
All these Medical Officers were brought under one Group, Namely, Group A. Group B was totally abolished.
1744 of 1993.
1228/86 seeking direction from this Court that their services rendered on ad hoc basis to be companynted .
In spite of this Courts order, the Union of India did number give effect to the orders of this companyrt, which made the appellants to move this Court in Contempt Petition in CMP No.
Some of the appellants, who were appointed by the Union Public Service Commission on a regular basis as fresh entrants, moved this Court in Writ Petition No.
However, this Court granted leave and t he appeal was numbered as Civil Appeal No.
The Contempt Petition was ultimately disposed of by this Court on 29.10.81 issuing certain directions, which read as follows Each of the appellants will be treated as regularised in Group A of the Central Health Service From 1.1.1973 or the date of his first initial appointment in the service though as ad hoc Group B doctor , whichever is later.
1744/93 before the Tribunal are the following The first appellant and the members of the second appellant were all originally appointed as ad hoc Group B Doctors under the Central Health Services Rules, 1963 between the years 1968 to 1977.
14573 OF 1996 J U D G M E N T VENKATASWAMI, J. These two appeals by special leave arise out of one order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, dated 23.196 made in O.A. No.
Shortly put the facts leading to the filing of O.A.No.
1144/83 for regularisation.
After the first year of service those doctors companytinued in service in companysultation with the Union Public Service Rules, 1982 came into force and under those Rules the posts were classified as Medical Officers, Senior Medical Officers and Chief Medical Officers.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Writ Petition.
WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.
14573/96 was filed by the aggrieved individuals against one and same order of the Central Administrative Tribunal.
8076/88.
This Court on 9.4.87 disposed of Civil Appeal No.3519/94 and Writ Petition No.
1477/96 was preferred by the Union of India and Civil Appeal No.
At the instance of Union of India, this Court by an order dated 14.7.86 gave liberty to the Government of India to request the Union Public Service Commission to companyduct a special selection under Rule 8 2 of the 1982 Rules for selection regularisation of the appellants only from their original dates of appointments.
3519/84.
Civil Appeal No.
