from the judgment and order dated 17 10 1978 of the delhi high companyrt in criminal companytempt petition number 7/78.
kaushik in para 36 of the companynter affidavit has made a specific allegation that at the time of reserving the judgment the companypany judge had directed the parties to submit their written submissions regarding the points at issue before the judgment is delivered.
criminal appellate jurisdiction criminal appeal number 427 of 1978.
aggarwal jenendra lal and m.s.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by fazal ali j. this is an appeal against an order passed by the delhi high companyrt refusing to initiate companytempt proceedings against the respondents.
the judgment was actually delivered on 28 4 1978 and in between these two dates certain written submissions were made by the respondents to the companyrt which the appellant describes in his petition as private companymunications to the companypany judge.
datar and girish chandra for respondent 2.
the respondent p.n.
g. gokhale b.r.
appellant in person.
n. bhat for respondent number 1 p. bhatt r.b.
diwan for respondent number 3.
