24 of 1999 was on the Board of the High Court, the respondent moved an application before the High Court saying that he has been asked to return the files and therefore he may be discharged on payment of his full fees.
2003 Supp 5 SCR 387 The following Order of the Court was delivered Leave granted.
On such application, the High Court relying on earlier judgments passed the following order In view of the above decisions of this Court, the application of Sri A.K. Saxena is allowed and he is granted leave for being discharged as companynsel for the appellant.
This appeal is against a judgment of the High Court dated 3rd April, 2002.
As such a number of matters used to be assigned to him It appears that some dispute arose between the appellants and the respondent as a result of which the respondent was asked to return all papers.
However, the appellant New India Assurance Co. Ltd., shall pay his full fees.
It appears that when appeal from Order No.
The respondent was willing to return the papers provided that all his fees were paid.
Briefly stated the facts are that the respondent was an advocate on panel of the appellants.
