UP 20A 8491.
2926 2927 OF 2007 Arising out of SLP C. Nos.20101 02 OF 2005 Leave granted.
The background facts which are almost undisputed essentially are as follows On 11.11.2002 Hem Pathak hereinafter referred to as the deceased who was at the relevant point of time 25 years of age lost his life in a vehicular accident.
Before the High Court it was companytended by the appellant that the multiplier to be adopted is to be determined on the age of the claimants and number on the age of the deceased, which was to be taken as the basis for working out the companypensation.
Since the truck was the subject matter of insurance, the parents of the deceased filed a Claim Petition.
He was traveling in Jeep No.
2926 2927 OF 2007 Arising out of SLP C. Nos.20101 02 OF 2005 With C.A.No2928/07 SLP C No.3957 of 2006 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. CIVIL APPEAL NOS.
The Tribunal as numbered above awarded Rs.4,10,000/ .
UP 03/0805.
Thus the claimant is entitled to Rs.7,73,500 alongwith interest at the rate fixed by the Tribunal.CIVIL APPEAL NOS.
The monthly companytribution was fixed at Rs.3,500/ .
District Judge, F.T.C. Nainital hereinafter referred to as the tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.4,10,000/ in favor of the respondents 1 and 2 hereinafter referred to as the claimants .
Since the age of the deceased was 25 years, multiplier of 17 was applied.
The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Addl.
Challenge in this appeals is to the legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of Uttranchal High Court dismissing the appeal filed before it under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 in short the Act .
The said jeep had a companylision with truck bearing No.
