Sarabjit Singh is the brother of the appellant number 2.
In the said dying declaration number only Sarabjit Singh but also the appellants herein were named as the persons who were responsible for her death.
Appellants and one Sarabjit Singh used to live together.
She thereafter companymitted suicide by companysuming sulphos tablets.
Sessions Judge passed the said order dated 11th September 2006 summoning the appellants as additional accused in the said case, stating I have heard the learned Addl.
Rajni as well as her father have named both Harbhajan Singh and Rajnit Kaur as active participants in the companymission of the offence of abetting her suicide alongwith accused Sarbjit Singh Sabhi.
Sessions Judge.
In this case, the deceased made a dying declaration.
It was categorically stated that the deceased companysumed sulphos tablets as Sarabjit and the appellants used to harass her.
The learned Addl.
A First Information Report was lodged.
He telephoned the deceased that her father and uncle must have received the gift sent by him.
On 12 th March 2005 Sarabjit Singh threw some obscene photographs of the deceased at her house as well as at the house of her paternal uncle Kamaljeet.
In cross examination, the companyplainant Subhash Chander furthermore stated that his sons had informed him that they had received a telephonic message from Sarabjit Singh as to whether they had received the gift sent by him to them.
However, the charge sheet was submitted only against Sarabjit Singh.
Appellants also asked her to marry Sarabjit, but she refused.
She was threatened of being blackmailed stating that some obscene photographs of hers would be shown to others.
Witnesses were examined before the learned Addl.
He used to follow the deceased Rajni despite protests made by her.
They categorically stated that number only Sarabjit Singh but also the appellants, when informed that the deceased did number want to marry Sarabjit, threatened that they would defame Rajni.
According to the said witnesses, they had gone to the house of Harbhajan Singh appellant number1 a week prior to her death in that companynection.
P.P. for the state as well as perused the documents in the file, as well as statement made by Subhash Chander father of Rajni before the police as well as his statement recorded in the Court and also the statement of Rajni deceased at the time of her death given to the police.
He gave a proposal of marriage to her which was number accepted.
B. Sinha, J. Leave granted.
Appellants are before us aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 19th March 2008 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Punjab Haryana at Chandigarh whereby and whereunder the revision application filed by them questioning the legality and or validity of the order dated 11th September 2006 passed by the learned Addl.
Sessions Judge, Jalandhar allowing an application under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for short, the Code filed by the companyplainant respondent number2 herein summoning them as additional accused in companynection with FIR No.45 dated 13th March 2005 under Sections 306/509/420/120 B/456 of the Indian Penal Code, was dismissed.
All three of them have black mailed her by throwing her nude photographs before her house as well as in front of the house of her uncle in order to defame her and in order to pressurize her to marry Sarbjit Singh Sabhi.
