By an order dated 13.11.1998 passed in writ Petition No.
Indisputably, a scheme known as Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme.
1980 was floated by the Central Government.
1 herein from a judgment and order dated 23.9.2004 passed by a learned Single Judge of the said Court was set aside.
Conditions for grant of said samman were specified therein, the relevant provisions whereof being clause 2, 3, are as under 2.3 Underground A person who on account of his participation in freedom struggle remained underground for more than six months provided he was A. a proclaimed offender or B. one on whom an award for arrest was announced or C. one for whose detention, order was issued but number served.
B. Sinha, J. Leave granted.
73 of 2005 whereby and whereunder an inter Court appeal preferred by Respondent No.
The Union of India is before us questioning a judgment and order dated 18.2.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Writ Appeal No.
1 filed in this behalf in terms of the said scheme having been rejected by the appropriate Government, a writ petition was filed before High Court.
and announcing an award on his head.
The said documents have been scrutinized and found that they are lacking to fulfill certain companyditions which are as follows the documents submitted by you shows that all the 98 persons enlisted were to be detained by the police as per the powers companyferred to police Department and it was number executed according to your claim warrant of arrest in your case does number appear to have been issued by the companycerned Jurisdictional Magistrate.
Pursuant thereto or in furtherance thereof the application of the first respondent was companysidered and rejected by the appellants in terms of an order dated 21.10.1999 stating You have claimed underground suffering in companynection with the freedom struggle for merger of erstwhile Hyderabad State into Indian Union and have produced a companyy of detention order issued by the Director Gen. of Police of Nizam Govt.
