Appeals by special leave from the orders dated the June 29, 1963 and August 31, 1963 of the Industrial Tribunal II Uttar Pradesh and Industrial Tribunal H , Uttar Pradesh Appellate authority in Appeals Nos.
164/65 .
C. Setalvad, B. L. Khanna and K. K. Jain, for the appellant in C.A. No.
1 of 1963 and 4 of 1963 respectively.
The appellant is a Joint Stock Company incorporated under the Companies Act, and it has its registered office at Allahabad.
1105/65 .
In the certification proceedings, these representatives took numberobjection to the draft Standing Orders submitted by the appellant.
L. Khanna and K. K. Jain, for the appellant in C.A. No.
164 of 1965 and 1105 of 1964.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.
The draft Standing Orders with the changes made by the Certifying Officer were accordingly certified on the 21st November, 1962.
The Certifying Officer, however, examined the fairness and reasonableness of the provisions companytained in the said draft Standing Orders and made several changes in them.
In fact, the said draft Standing Orders were submitted to the Certifying Officer on the basis that they had been agreed to by the appellant and its workmen.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Gajendragadkar, C.J. This appeal has been brought to this Court by special leave and it challenges the validity of certain orders passed by the Certifying Authorities in respect of the draft Standing Orders which the appellant, The Rohtak Hissar District Electric Supply Co. Ltd., had submitted to them for certification.
B. Agarwala and O. P. Rana, for respondents 1 and 2.
Five respondents have been impleaded to this appeal they are the State of U.P., Certifying Officer for Standing Orders and Labour Commissioner, U.P., Kanpur, and three representatives of the employees respectively.
In the result, the appeal preferred by the appellant was dismissed by the Appellate Authority on the 29th June, 1963.
It was urged by the appellant before the Appellate Authority that the Certifying Officer was in error in making modifications in the draft Standing Orders submitted to him for his certification, but the Appellate Authority did number accept the appellants companytention and, in substance, companyfirmed the order passed by the Certifying Officer.
It is against this appellate order that the appellant has companye to this Court by special leave.
I alone.
Against the said order passed by the Certifying Officer, the appellant filed an appeal before the Industrial Tribunal, P., Allahabad, which had been appointed the Appellate Authority under the Act.
