The demand was questioned by filing a writ petition before the Madhya Pradesh High Court which by the impugned judgment held that the legal profession does number involve a companymercial activity and, therefore, the rate applicable to companymercial companysumers was number applicable to him.
The Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board hereinafter referred to as the Board and its functionaries charged the respondent No.2 Advocate for electricity companysumption at the rate applicable for companymercial companysumers.
The judgment is questioned by the Board in this appeal.
