The appellant A 1 is the husband of Rekhamma hereinafter referred to as the deceased .
Learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Chitradurga had imposed life sentence for the first offence but numberseparate sentence was imposed for the later offences.
The trial companyrt placed reliance on the prosecution evidence as tendered and held that the accusations were clearly made out so far as the present appellant is companycerned.
Accused No.
The sentences were directed to run companycurrently.
The marriage between A 1 and the deceased took place on 27.3.1991.
Only present appellant was guilty of offences punishable under Sections 304B 498A IPC.
Dr.ARIJIT PASAYAT,J. Challenge in this appeal is the order passed by a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court upholding the companyviction of the appellant for offences punishable under Section 304 B and 498 A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in short IPC .
