1 filed a writ petition in the High Court and the High Court by the impugned order directed that the Selection Board may undertake a reappraisal of the claim of respondent No.
In doing so, the appellant companyplain that the High Court had departed from the earlier decision of another Division Bench on the question of relaxation of time limit for furnishing the required certificate.
1 was called for interview and he was asked to produce the certificate showing that he had acquired the qualification in question.
1 did number possess the said qualification since he claims to have qualified on 22nd May, 1990.
The Selection Board companypleted the selection and granted appointments accordingly.
The last date for forwarding the applications was 20th April, 1990 on which date, admittedly, the respondent No.
2 to 5 and prepare a fresh list of eligible candidates in accordance with merit for the post in question.
He failed to do so even at the interview stage and hence the Selection Board did number select him and informed him about the same.
The eligibility for appointment was that the candidate should possess M.Ch.
Heard companynsel on both sides.
Special leave granted.
1 along with respondents Nos.
Even so, respondent No.
qualification.
The respondent No.
