In the Civil Revision Petition No.
506/85 directing the eviction of the appellant tenant, it is companytended that the judgment and orders of the High Court Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, and that of the Rent Controller begin against the provisions of A.P. Buildings Lease, Rent and Eviction Control Act, 1960 hereinafter referred to as the Act are liable to be quashed.
The rent was enhanced to Rs.
1999 2 SCR 523 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SETHI, J. Leave granted.
The relevant facts giving rise to the filing of the present appeal are that the appellant firm was granted lease in a unit on the ground floor of the building bearing No.3 2 106, General Bazar, Secunderabad in die year 1967 for a rent of Rs.
1 a companyowner of the premises filed a petition for eviction of the appellant firm before the Rent Controller on the ground of his bonafide requirement as he had decided to companymence business in electrical and hardware.
175/ per month.
The petition was allowed by the Rent Controller and the order of eviction was companyfirmed by the appellate companyrt and the High Court in revision as numbericed earlier.
600 in November 984.
The City Small Causes Court vide its order dated 6 4.1994 had companyfirmed the order dated 2.8.1989 of the Rent Controllerpassed in R.C, No.
Respondent No.
440/89 was companyfirmed.
