and subsequently killed him and buried the dead body near the Rudreshwar Mahadev temple on the river bank.
The other appeals are filed by the State.
Bhagirath also challenged his companyviction under Section 364 IPC by filling an appeal.
The charge against Bhagirath was that as he was removed form service by Prem Prakash Mundra, he bore a grudge against Prem Prakash and by way of revenge, he kidnapped his son Babloo on 2.9.1986 at about 6.00p.m.
679 80 OF 1990 J U D G M E N T Nanavati, J. These four appeals arise out of the same judgment of the Rajasthan High Court in D.B.Criminal Reference No.
It was also alleged that he companymitted those acts along with companyaccused Gopal.
The prosecution examined some witnesses to prove that they had seen Bhagirath taking Babloo on a cycle.
As death sentence was awarded to Bhagirath, a reference was made by the trial companyrt to the High Court for companyfirmation of theat sentence.
WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.
666 67/90 are filed by the father of deceased Babloo for whose murder the respondent Bhagirath and one Gopal were tried.
14/89.
In all these appeals, the acquittal of Bhagirath for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC is called in question.
1/89 and D.B.Criminal Appeal No.
Criminal Appeal Nos.
