226 in the high companyrt of nagpur but that petition was withdrawn and therefore numberdecision was given on the merits of the case.
32 of the constitution challenging the imposition of sales tax on betel leaves by the sales tax officer akola.
ganapathy iyer and k. l. hathi for the petitioners.
he then filed a petition under art.
4 and 36 did number appeal under s. 22 of the act but the petitioner in w. p. number 37 did appeal under that section.
1890 3 0 p. number 37/58 27 10 54 to 14 11 55.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by kapur j. these are three petitions under art.
1882 9 0 27 10 54 to 14 11 55.
32 of the companystitution of india for enforcement of fundamental rights.
436 and 37 of 1958.
3530 4 0 the petitioners in w. p. number.
original jurisdiction petitions number.
petition under art.
march 14.
the petitioners in the three petitions are dealers in betel leaves at akola number in the state of maharashtra and at the relevant time in the state of madhya pradesh.
the assistant sales tax officer at akola assessed the petitioners under the provisions of the c. p. berar sales tax act 1947 act xxi of 1947 hereinafter termed the act to the payment of gales tax as follows writ petition period amount number p. number 4/58 7 11 53 to 26 10 54.
1885 13 0 p. number 36/58 27 10 54 to 26 10 55.
k. paphtary solicitor general of india b. r. l. iyengar an p. m. sen for the respondents.
as he did number deposit the amount of tax the petition was dismissed.
