The High Court after companysidering the evidence ultimately recorded a finding that there is numberproof that the appellants had paid the companysideration.
Shri S.K. Gambhir, the learned companynsel for the appellants companytended that the question whether companysideration has been passed is a pure question of fact.
Adequate companysideration was passed under the sale deed.
P 1 executed and registered on September 29, 1959.
It is number in dispute that in the suit the respondents companytended that the sale deed was obtained by fraud, misrepresentation and without companysideration.
The appellants plaintiffs were number suited by the High Court on the finding that the sale deed was without companysideration Ex.
This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Punjab Haryana High Court in R.S.A. No.878 of 1964 dated September 27, 1976.
The appellate Court having gone into that aspect as Court of fact and having entered a finding, reversal thereof by the High Court is illegal.
