All the aggrieved parties preferred appeals before the State Trans port Appellate Tribunal.
938 of 1980 there was only one permit for the route Salem to Pallipatti which was granted to the State Transport Undertaking.
In Civil Appeal No.
From the JUdgment and Order dated 22.2.1980 of the Madras High Court in C.R.P. Nos.
601 of 1977.
In Civil Appeal No.
940 of 1980, on the route Salem to Erode, the objection of the State Transport Undertaking on the renewal sought by Parsu raman Pillai respondent was sustained and the permit was granted to the State Transport Undertaking, leaving the private operator aggrieved.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.
93794 1 of 1980.
94 1 of 1980, on the route Salem to Tiruchangode, the renewal appli cation of K. Ramaswamy respondent operator was declined on objection by the State Transport Undertaking, who in turn, on its application, was granted the permit leaving the private operator K. Ramaswamy respondent aggrieved.
1n other words, it was denied to the Second respondent, R.P. David.
Srinivasan for the RespOndents.
In relation to Civil Appeal No.
937 of 1980 the Regional Transport Authority, out of two permits, granted one permit on the route Salem to Poolambadi to the appellant State Transport Undertaking and the other to the first respondent, Safe Service Ltd. In Civil Appeal No.
The following Order of the Court was delivered These are five Civil Appeals by Special Leave against identical orders of a learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court.
939 of 1980, on the route Salem to Poolambadi, out of two permits, one permit was granted to the State Transport Undertaking and the other to another private operator, Suganeswara Motor Service denying the permit to P. David respondent herein.
V. Rangam for the Appellant.
In Civil Appeal No.
934/78, 602/77, 110/78 and 111/78 and dated 29.2.1980 in C.R.P. No.
