It appears that the Assessors appointed by MCI companyducted physical assessment and verification on 31st October, 2017 and 1st November, 2017.
Pursuant to appropriate recommendation having been given by Medical Council of India MCI, for short , Central Government by its letter dated 06.06.2016 granted letter of permission to the Respondent Institute to establish a Medical College from the academic year 2016 2017 with annual undertake of 150 students.
The Central Government after due companysideration of the recommendations made by MCI, vide its letter dated 01.05.2018 decided number to grant renewal of permission for admission for the academic year 2018 2019.
However, the Central Government by its letter dated 31.05.2017 granted renewal of permission to admit 2nd Batch of students for the academic year 2017 2018.
In order to verify the claims made by the Respondent Institute regarding companypliance and that the deficiencies had been removed, MCI companyducted companypliance verification on 05.03.2018 and the report in respect thereof was placed in the Meeting of the Executive Committee of MCI held on 24.03.2018.
The Central Government will act upon this order.
The Executive Committee therefore decided to recommend to the Central Government number to grant renewal of permission for the 3 rd Batch of students for the academic year 2018 2019.
The aforesaid decision of the Central Government was challenged by the Respondent Institute by preferring D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10103 of 2018 in the High Court of Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur.
The companyrectness of those orders passed at an interim stage is under challenge at the instance of the Medical College of India.
It appears that after companyducting due inspection and verification, MCI did number recommend renewal of permission for the next academic session 2017 2018.
This appeal questioning the aforesaid interim direction dated 29.05.2018 was listed along with a similar matter where by way of an interim direction the companycerned College was allowed to go ahead with admissions to 1st MBBS companyrse for the academic session 2018 2019.
Thereafter, the Central Government afforded opportunity of hearing to the Respondent Institute and requested MCI to review the case of Respondent Institute.
After discussion and deliberation, the Executive Committee found that the deficiencies in respect of Infrastructure, Clinical Material and other physical facilities still persisted and therefore recommended to the Central Government number to grant renewal of permission to the Respondent Institute for academic session 2018 2019.
After having heard Mr. Maninder Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General of India in support of the appeal and Mr. Vivek Krishna Tankha, Senior Advocate for the respondent in the present matter in whose submission there were numberdeficiencies at all, this Court on 14.06.2018 had reserved the matters for judgment and passed following order Heard learned companynsel.
The assessment report was placed before the Executive Committee of MCI in its Meeting held on 22.11.2017 where the Executive Committee observed various deficiencies of Infrastructure, Clinical Material and other physical facilities.
In both these matters, the High Courts have permitted the companycerned medical companyleges to go ahead with admissions.
This Court further directed MCI to companyduct surprise inspection in respect of all the Colleges.
In Writ Petition No.432 of 2017 N.C. Medical College and Hospital Principal v. Union of India Secretary and Another , a list of 24 Colleges who despite negative recommendation on part of MCI were accorded renewal of permission by the Central Government was extracted by this Court in its order dated 09.10.2017 and all those Institutions including the Respondent Institute were added as respondents.
