The rival claimants claimed to be in possession of the land and were protesting against the claim of the accused and resisting of the attempts of the accused to plough the land.
39/01.
On the aforesaid date the occurrence took place between the two groups resulting in the death of 4 persons of the companyplainants group.
Some were companyvicted by the Sessions Judge vide his judgment dated 1.10.1993.
777 of 1994.
Tough pattas had been issued in favour of some of the accused and the land was registered in their name, there were disputes relating to the same which were pending before the Revenue Authorities.
The appellants and the other accused were charged with offences under Section 147, 148, 302/149 and 307/149 I.P.C. Two of them were also charged for having hatched a criminal companyspiracy for companymitting the offences.
On appeals, the High Court companyfirmed the companyviction and sentence of these three appellants with some modification and acquitted the rest.
On 25.6.1990 the accused the 4 absconding persons were said to be cultivating a land known as Kothotiya Har.
with him for the Respondent J U D G M E N T The following Judgment of the Court was delivered Honble Srinivasan, J. The appellants in these two appeals were accused 1, 2 and 3 before the Court of Sessions Judge, Tikamgarh,, Madhya Pradesh in Sessions Case No.
As pointed out by the High Court, it was number the suggestion of the appellants to any of the witness that the deceased had fire arms the them.
There were 22 accused apart from 4 persons who had absconded.
for Uma Nath Singh, Adv.
