These appeals are filed against the final judgment and order dated 28.08.2018 in Special Appeal No.25 of 2015 and order dated 07.09.2018 Signature Not Verified in Review Application MCC No.1193 of 2018 in Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA Special Appeal No.25 of 2015 passed by the High Date 2018.12.03 170027 IST Reason Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital whereby the High Court dismissed the special appeal and the Review Application filed by the appellant herein.
By order dated 21.07.2006, the Commissioner, Nainital passed an order directing Nagar Palika to execute the sale deed in favour of the appellant.
In 1990, the Nagar Palika issued an advertisement to auction their residential quarter Nos.6 and 7 situated at Waverly Compound Gopala Sadan Mallital, Naintal.
By order dated 12.03.2007, the State set aside the order of the Commissioner dated 21.07.2006 which gave rise to filing of the writ petition by the appellant in the High Court at Nainital.
The appellant, therefore, filed an application under Section 35 of the Municipalities Act praying therein for a direction to the Nagar Palika for execution of the sale deed in his favour in relation to quarter No.6.
The appellant companyplained that in the year 2001 18.07.2001 , the Nagar Palika instead of executing the sale deed in his favour in relation to quarter No.6, passed a resolution to sell quarter No.6 along with other quarters in public auction.
By impugned order, the High Court dismissed the writ petition and also the review application filed by the appellant herein, giving rise to filing of the present appeals by way of special leave in this Court.
He also fixed the rate at which the sale deed was to be executed followed by another order to that effect.
The Nagar Palika felt aggrieved and filed application appeal to the State respondent No.1 .
Having heard the learned companynsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, we find numbermerit in these appeals.
The appellant claimed that he occupied quarter No.6 and started living therein since June 1990.
Respondent Nos.3 and 4 are the Nagar Palika Parishad, Nainital hereinafter referred to as the Nagar Palika .
The appellant herein claimed to be one of the participants in the auction proceedings and also the highest bidder.
So far as this case is companycerned, it relates to quarter No.
