He was alleged to have taken bribes and was charged with offences under Section 161 IPC read with Sections 5 1 d and 5 2 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947.
This appeal is preferred against the judgment of the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, in Writ Petition No.2057 of 1996 dated September 30, 1996.
In the absence of any stay order from the High Court, the appellant proceeded with the disciplinary enquiry and passed an order of termination on September 9, 1996.
On that basis, the appellant on May 16, 1996 issued a show cause numberice asking the respondent to show cause why his services should number be terminated.
The respondent, instead of giving a reply, moved the High Court challenging the show cause numberice itself but he companyld number.
That ended in his companyviction.
The respondent was in the employment of the appellant as Stores Officer.
secure an order of stay.
