The petition filed by respondent No.1 claiming that he was a juvenile was rejected.
Objections were filed by the State and the informant stating that the applicant was a major on the date of occurrence and, therefore, the application was liable to be rejected.
The High Court in the revision petition accepted that the school records produced by the applicant were number reliable and the statement of his mother also did number support his case.
The respondent No.1 was facing trial in S.T. No.67/07.
It was companycluded that the applicant was number juvenile.
Respondent No.1 filed a Revision Petition against the order dated 10.7.2007 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge Fast Track Court I, Mazaffarnagar.
The learned Additional Sessions Judge did number rely on the educational records and the statements of the mother as well as of the medical opinion.
During trial he moved the application marked 13Kha for declaring him as juvenile pleading that his date of birth was 1.1.1989.
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court allowing the Writ Petition filed by respondent No.1.
In support of the claim he relied on various records as well as the statements of his father and mother.
