Therefore, there were three persons in the panel above him.
A Division Bench of the said Court dismissed the said writ petition, stating Our attention was number drawn to any statutory or otherwise rules authorizing the authority companycerned to keep the panel alive after supplying the numberified vacancies.
His position was at Serial No.4 and number even at Serial No.1.
of Indias instructions therefore 3 panel prepared for direct recruitment should number be unduly inflated and should take care of immediate vacancies and those which are likely to occur in the near future.
Interview was also held on 26.6.2000 and the said vacancy had also been filled up.
The said fact was brought on record by Appellants herein.
During pendency of the said application, another advertisement was issued on 17.5.2000 for filling up of one vacancy, which occurred in the year 2000.
Arising out of SLP C No.7903 of 2004 B. Sinha, J. Leave granted.
A maximum of ten percent additional persons can be kept on the panel against the existing vacancies at the time of preparation pf panel or vacancies likely to occur in the near future.
The said order came to be questioned before the Calcutta High Court.
A review application was filed by the 1st Respondent and by reason of the impugned judgment, the same was allowed by another Division Bench of the said Court, stating Having regard to the unusual nature of the case, we have devoted companysiderable time to the submissions made on behalf of the parties, both in support of the application and against it, and we are companyvinced that the order of the Division Bench sought to be reviewed suffers from errors apparent on the face of the record.
of vacancies 3 three The 1st Respondent together with others, pursuant to or in furtherance of the said advertisement filed application.
By an order dated 13.9.2002, the Tribunal rejected the said Original Application, inter alia, opining In the present case, however only 3 candidates had figured in the select list for immediate appointment and the panel of candidates in the waiting list had been cancelled on the ground that one of the candidates in that panel was number qualified and that the preparation of the panel was number in accordance with the Government of India AN Administration instructions.
The Department of Personnel and Training, Andaman Nicobar Administration Administration issued a circular letter, stating As you may be aware, as per the instructions of the Government of India, whereas validity of panel prepared against promotion quota is generally limited to one year, there is numberfixed life of the panel against direct recruitment post.
Accord ing to the Govt.
