During the pendency of the said petition, the respondent almost after expiry of two years filed an application, that is, I.A. No.
As per the terms and companyditions of the agreement, the appellant, a Government undertaking, had agreed to build and deliver a cargo ship to the respondent for the price of Rs.
After the award was sent to the civil companyrt, the claimant appellant moved the Court for passing a decree under Section 17 of the 1940 Act in terms of the award and the respondent filed P. Arb.
Be it numbered, further liberty was granted to summon the entire record including the orders passed in the companyrse of the arbitral proceeding.
30 of 2009 under Sections 30 and 33 to set aside the award.
Dipak Misra, J. In this Appeal, by special leave, the appellant calls in question the legal tenability of the order passed by the learned single Judge of the High Court of Kerala in O.P. C No.
32.527 crores.
5625 of 2011 seeking permission to examine the learned arbitrator and the General Manager of the respondent as witnesses.
