Against the judgment of the learned single Judge, the Appellants filed an Appeal.
At that time numberchallenge was made to the Notification.
The Writ Petition came to be dismissed by a single Judge of the High Court on 18th of February, 1994.
However, by another Notification dated 11th April, 1987, the licence fees was enhanced from Rs.50/ to Rs.500/ in case of money lending and pawn broking business and Rs.200/ in case of money exchange operations.
The Respondent Corporation had in the year 1972 by a Notification dated 14th/15th April, 1972, numberified the business of money lenders and pawn brokers as one which required a licence under Section 521 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act.
The Appeal came to be dismissed by the impugned Judgment dated 27th November, 1998.
Having so numberified a licence fee of Rs.50/ was charged from all money lenders and pawn brokers.
The Appellants filed a writ petition in the High Court of Andhra Pradesh challenging the Notification dated 11th April, 1987, inter alia, on the ground that Section 521 did number empower the Commissioner to numberify the trades of money lending and pawn broking as being trades for which a licence is necessary.
N. VARIAVA, J. Leave granted.
LITTTTTTTJ This Appeal is against a Judgment dated 27th November, 1998.
Briefly stated the facts are as follows The Appellants are an Association of money lenders and pawn brokers.
