This application was ordered to be listed at the time of the hearing of this appeal.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated the 29th March, 1980 of the Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench know in Writ Petition No.
Later on, he realised that such an application companyld number be moved on behalf of an intervener, and therefore, instead of pursuing this application, he filed Writ Petition No.
He also moved an application M.P.No.
They have always formed the backbone of the revenue administration in that State.
N. Dixit, Mrs. Shobha Dikshit and H.R. Bhardwaj for the Appellants.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
N. Kackar, K.K Mohan, Rajiv Datta and A.S. Pandit for the Respondent.
In support of this companytention, reliance has been placed on Reserve Bank of India v. C.S. Rajappan Nair and others, State of Jammu Kashmir v. Triloki Nath Khosa and others, Ramesh Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar and others, and Ganga Ram and others v. Union of India and others.
N. Pareek and S.K Jain for the Intervener.
AND CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION Nos.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MISRA, J. The present appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment dated 29th March 1979 of the Allahabad High Court allowing a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution.
11949/80 for modification of the stay order dated 23rd of April 1980 in the appeal filed by the State, so as to govern other cases affected by rules 7 A and 7 B of the 1970 Rules, as amended by the 1972 numberification.
3 dated 4th of July 1972.
In the State of Uttar Pradesh, there is a Service companymonly known as Naib Tehsildars.
524 of 1979.
4905 and 11949 of 1980.
Sixty per cent of the posts of Naib Tehsildars are filled through a companypetitive examination held by the State Public Service Commission.
282 of 1980.
His grievance started only with the introduction of rules 7 A and 7 B to the 1970 Rules by numberification No.42/4/1966 Apptt.
