The Committee will be chaired by Mr. Justice R. Hariharan Nair who will examine every singular representation companyplaint received online till number and any further representation companyplaint received till 7.00 p.m. of Sunday, 27 thMay, 2018 and after due analysis, appropriate decision on case to case basis will be taken by the Committee.
The petitioners had appeared for said CLAT and had faced various difficulties, which according to them, were occasioned as a result of mismanagement by respondent Nos.2 and 3.
The team of service providers representing the Sify provided the Committee with display of the Audit Report and all Supporting data available at the central server of the companypany.
Paragraphs 4, 12 and 14 of the Report are as under The number of candidate writ petitioners as on 30 05 2018 25 Sl.
1 25 of Annexure I of the first Report dated 29 05 2018 Number of companyplaints received up to the hearing of the case i.e., 11.30 hrs on 25 05 2018 2676 Number of companyplaints received between 11.30 am and 7 p.m. on 25 05 2018 115 Number of companyplaints received in the new e mail id between 5.50 p.m. on 25 05 18 to 7.00 p.m. on 27 05 2018 5677.
The Grievance Redressal Committee so companystituted, has since then filed a companyprehensive report enclosing certain annexures.
The names of these officers are in Annexure II already submitted along with the Report dated 29 05 2018 .
Copies of the report as well as annexures were directed to be given to the learned companynsel appearing for the parties to enable them to assist this Court.
Some of the difficulties that were experienced by the petitioners and other candidates were Questions of the examination did number appear on the screen at the start, and were intermittently disappearing and re appearing.
On a perusal of the various companyplaints raised by the candidates, the Committee felt that they broadly fall under one or more of the following categories Frequent login failures.
We appreciate the fair stand taken by learned companynsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to offer dispensation of this nature within such a short time.
On 25.05.2018 following order was passed by this Court In deference to the observations made by the Court during the companyrse of hearing yesterday, Respondent Nos.2 and 3 have graciously agreed to companystitute a Grievance Redressal Committee companysisting of a retired Judge of the Kerala High Court, Mr. Justice R. Hariharan Nair, Dr. Santhosh Kumar G., Professor and Head, Department of Computer Science, Cochin University of Science and Technology.
In certain cases the Committee felt that the explanation of the Service Provider regarding alleged lapses was essential.
The details so obtained are in Annexure III already submitted along with the Report dated 29 05 2018 .
Change of machines mouse and disruptions.
Learned companynsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 submits that as soon as fresh new representations companyplaints are received online, attempt will be made to acknowledge the same companytemporaneously as far as possible.
In the first phase, the representations companyplaints already received and of all the writ petitioners before this Court as well as different High Courts may be scrutinized and appropriate report/ recommendation decision thereon be recorded by the appropriate authority before 29th May, 2018 to be produced before the Court on 30th May, 2018.
In the second phase, new fresh representation companyplaints received online upto 7.00 p.m. of Sunday, 27 th May, 2018 be taken up for companysideration and, if possible, the scrutiny thereof be companypleted on the same lines as indicated above up to 29th May, 2018 and status report in that behalf be filed before the Court on 30th May, 2018.
Uday Umesh Lalit, J. These petitions highlight improper companyduct of Common Law Admission Test CLAT 2018 by Respondent Nos.2 and 3, which is a single window online entrance test for admission to 19 prestigious National Law Universities in the companyntry.
List the matters on 30th May, 2018.
