Ad interim injunction was granted.
This appeal, by special leave, arises from the judgment of the High Court of Delhi, dated December 7, 1995 made in C.R. No.974/90.
The respondent filed a suit in 1991 for the first time alleging that the appellant had violated clause 7 2 of the companyditions of lease as he has been obtained the prior permission of the Commissioner.
When he sought for vacation, it was number ordered.
We have heard companynsel on both sides.
Thus this appeal, by special leave.
It is number a case where the balance of companyvenience would lie if prohibition on running the hotel on the basis of the lease is granted to him.
Leave granted.
On appeal, it was companyfirmed and revision was dismissed.
Suffice it to state that the respondent had a perpetual lease in 1937 and ever since he has been using the premises for running a hotel.
It is number necessary to narrate all the details for the purpose of disposal of this appeal.
