Sarjoo Prashad and O. P. Rana, for the respondents.
T. Desai, J. P. Goyal, D. N. Jha and G. S. the appellant.
Judgment of the Court was delivered by Sikri, J. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment, dated November 11, 1966, of the Division Bench of tile Allahabad High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by tile appellant seeking to quash tile order of the State Transport Authority.
dated March 20/21.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
1966 of the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench in Writ Petition No.
It was of the view that when the Regional Transport Authority actually proceeds to fill Lip the vacancies, which it has decided to create, then the persons whose interests would be adversely affected, would have a right of representation before the Regional Transport Authority, and in the case of their representation being rejected by the Regional Transport Authority the will have a right of appeal before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment all order dated November 11.
636 of 1967.
The High Court was of the view that an existing operator had numbersay in the matter of determination of the strength on a route under sub s. 3 of s. 47, and, it was in the discretion of the Regional Transport Authority to determine the strength on a route, after companysidering various matters enumerated in cls.
The State Transport Authority had by this order rejected the appellants revision petition against the decision of the Regional Transport Authority oil the ground that a mere decision of the Regional Transport Authority limiting the number of stage carriages under S. 47 3 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 IV of 1939 hereinafter referred to as the Act companyld number form the subject matter of a revision application.
226 of 1963.
