Pending the eviction proceedings, respondents filed an application under Section 29 1 and 4 of the Act because the appellant had number paid the rent in spite of numberice.
From the Judgment and Order dated January 1, 1991 of the Karnataka High Court in C.R.P. No.
The subject matter of demise was a vacant site for the purpose of erection of cinema theatre by the tenant, appellant.
Inasmuch as the said amount was number paid on October 25, 1990, an order of eviction was passed.
10618 of 1990 On August 18, 1990, the trial companyrt passed an order on A. VI directing the appellant to pay the an ears of Rs 3,69,000.
The said revision came to be dismissed on January 29, 1991.
725 of 1991 was preferred to the High Court of Karnataka.
The companystruction was number companypleted within a period of two years.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MOHAN, J. The short facts leading to civil appeal are as under.
Therefore, the respondents filed an application under Section 21 1 a of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 hereinafter referred to as the Act and for bona fide requirement under Section 21 1 h of the Act.
He was put in possession.
The appellant defaulted in payment of arrears of rent.
The appellant made an application for renewal of licence.
Hence, this civil appeal.
Thereupon, he applied for a licence for companystruction.
Against this order, Civil Revision Petition No.
On objection by the respondents, the renewal was number granted.
The respondents executed a lease agreement on December 6, 1971 for a period of 32 years.
As a result, the companystruction of cinema theatre was number companypleted.
For companypliance of this, thirty days time was granted.
