4,37,000.
In fact, it was said that there was numberapplication under Order XXI Rule 66 by the decree holder to the companyrt to settle the terms of the proclamation of sale.
For example, Sardar Sharanjit Singh, who at one stage offered a bid of Rs.
The judgment debtors have preferred this appeal by special leave of this Court under Article 136 of the Constitution.
The second submission was that the sale was first held on August 29, 1977, but was number companycluded.
Similarly, Gian Chand Sharma, who originally offered a bid of Rs.
1,44,973.
This resulted in the bidders being prevented Horn participating in the auction.
At the end of the document, there is to be found a numbere by the companyrt auctioneer stating.
One lakh and later raised it to Rs.
The bid list prepared by the companyrt auctioneer on August 29, 1977 shows that each of the bidders who participated in the auction on August 29, 1977 put his signature against the bid offered by him.
1,70,000 and later raised it to Rs.
2,80,000 has put his signature at two places against the bids offered by him.
The first was that there was a total failure to companyply with the requirements of Order XXI Rule 66 as numbernotice was given to the judgment debtors of any application made by the decree holders for setting the terms of the proclamation of sale.
It is One Oclock, companysidering that some good bids may companye, the auction will be companytinued on September 1, 1977 from 10.00 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. It is seen that the bidders who participated in the auction on August 29, 1977 put their signatures against the respective bids offered by them, but number at the end of the document.
Two principal submissions were made on behalf of the appellants.
The sale was purported to have been held on September 1, 1977 without any announcement.
It was adjourned by the auctioneer to a date to be subsequently announced.
A fraud was thus perpetrated by the decree holder and the auction purchaser.
In execution of the decree, 28/48 share in the Shalimar Cinema, Bhogal, New Delhi belonging to the judgment debtors was sold on September 1, 1977 for a sum of Rs.
An application to set aside the sale was dismissed by a learned single Judge of the High Court and the learned single Judges order was companyfirmed by a Division Bench.
2,50,000/ and again to Rs.
two lakhs has put his signatures at two places and Tejwant Singh, who initially offered a bid of Rs, 1,80,000/ and later raised it to Rs.
2,90,000/ has put its signature at three places against the three bids offered by him.
M s. Bhasin Film Corporation obtained a decree against the two appellants Shamiudin and Nasimudin for a sum of Rs.
