6 and 8 in the additional list.
That will number vitiate the selection as held by the Supreme Court in Subash Chandra Verma v. State of Bihar 1995 Supp.
It was also companytended that the list of the selected candidates had number been published.
Recruitment to the said post is number governed by any statutory rules.
4 and 5 and handed over the appointment orders on 22.05.2001, which was a Sunday.
It is also stated in the companynter affidavit that 50 marks were given to the written test and 50 marks for the interview.
It had categorically been stated that they were called for interview only one day prior to the holding thereof.
Appellant, having number been selected, filed a writ petition, on the premise that Respondent Nos.
It was alleged that the top officers of the Company personally went to the houses of Respondent Nos.
In the matter of selection to the post of Watchman, we feel it is more appropriate to set apart 50 marks for the interview.
12 posts of Watchman Messenger Attender fell vacant.
The said Government Order was, thus, number issued by the State of its own.
It wanted the State to pass an appropriate order.
4 and 5 were appointed by the companypany, although number eligible therefor.
However, keeping in view the total number of posts which were required to be filled up, only 36 candidates who got the highest marks were called for interview, appellant being one of them.
Appellant herein was appointed as a worker in the services of the Company in the year 1982.
The Writ Petition of the appellant was dismissed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court by a judgment and order dated 22.12.2005, holding From the companynter affidavit and also from the lists furnished by the petitioners themselves it is clear that of the 11 included in the additional list only two were appointed and they are serial Nos.
The Commission also did number intend to abide by the said directions.
Admittedly, all the workmen who were in service of the Company were to be companysidered therefor.
Arising out of SLP Civil No.
The Union of India and the State of Kerala are its shareholders.
It is indisputably a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India.
5064 of 2006 B. SINHA, J Leave granted.
It was, pursuant to or in furtherance of the said desire of the Commission as also the direction of the Tribunal as companytained in its interim order dated 6.1.2005, GOMs 200 was issued.
Physical fitness and personality are essential requirements for a watchman Resourcefulness, aptitude and initiative are qualities essential for a Messenger and Attender, apart from the bookish knowledge.
Oil Palm India Limited is a Government Company for short, the Company .
