P 7 would have been caused with sticks like MOs.1 to 5 and that the internal injuries 2 and 3 are sufficient to cause the death in the ordinary companyrse of nature.
A blue black abrasion 1 x 1 on the back and left lower part of the chest.
Later PW 1 went to police station and registered a companyplaint Ex.
No defence witness was examined but Exhibits D 1 to D 9 were marked on their side.
As regards injuries to PW 1 and PW 2, PW 8 Dr. M. Polaiah who medically examined PW 1 and PW 2 stated in his deposition that he was of the opinion that injury No.
A blue black abrasion 1 x over the left loin.
After beating the deceased, PW 1 and PW 2, the accused ran away from the place of occurrence.
The accused suspected that PW 2 was abusing them.
A black abrasion 1 x on the back of right lumber region.
2 i.e. Abrasion of 1 x over the anterior of triangle of left side of neck.
1 accused No.
The son of said accused loved the daughter of the deceased.
1 and 2 by inter alia modifying the companyviction of accused Nos.
A 2 beat the deceased by poking against his abdomen with stick near his naval, A 3 beat him on his back with a stick, A 1 and A 4 beat PW 2 with sticks and caused injuries and A 1 and A 4 beat PW 1 son of deceased on his left hand wrist and on his neck with sticks.
A 1 also interfered and the deceased beat him whereupon A 1 beat the deceased on his head with a stick and induced A 2 to A 5 to beat the deceased.
The injuries mentioned in Ex.
On 2.11.1998 at about 5.30 p.m., while accused Nos.
1 to 4 were returning to their village after finishing their fishing work and when they reached near the cattle shed of the deceased, they heard PW 2 wife of deceased abusing her cattle sarcastically.
PW 9 Dr. K. Sanjeevarao who held inquest over the dead body and issued post mortem certificate opined that the deceased died of shock due to rupture of mesenteric vessel and damage to the intestines.
The deceased, PW 1 and PW 2 were sent to the Government Headquarters Hospital, Machilipatnam.
In support of its case, the prosecution examined PWs 1 to 14, marked Exhibits P 1 to P 23 and also MOs 1 to 26.
5 is a close relative of accused Nos.
1 i.e. Swelling deformity of lower third of left forearm.
3 is his son and accused No.
The doctor stated that the injuries mentioned in the certificate would have been caused with sticks like MOs1 to 5 and that the internal injuries 2 and 3 were sufficient to cause the death in the ordinary companyrse of nature.
All are stated to be residents of Ramannamodi.
P 13 and a case under Section 324/34 IPC was started.
The doctor opined that the deceased appeared to have died of shock due to rupture of mesenteric vessels and companytusion of the intestines and death would have been occurred within 24 hours prior to the post mortem examination and Ex.
After the deceased succumbed to injuries on 4.11.1998 in the hospital, the police altered the FIR to Section 302 IPC and took up investigation, held inquest over the dead body, observed the scene of offence, companyducted panchnama, got the post mortem examination done and after receipt of post mortem report laid the chargesheet under Section 302/34 IPC against A 1 and A 2, under Section 325 against A 2, under Section 323 against A 1, A 4 and A 5 and under Section 114 against A 5.
2 were having prior disputes between them.
P 7 is the post mortem certificate he issued.
On internal examination, the doctor found 1 about 2 litre of blood present in the abdominal cavity and litre of blood present in the pelvic cavity, hemoperitoneum present and all the intestines companygested 2 bluish companytusion 6 x 1 on the middle third of small intestine 3 the mesentance vessels ruptured and the entire mesentery blood stained 4 three bluish blood clots each 30 grams on the mecentary near the superior mesenteric artery 5 all the internal organs like liver, both the lungs, spleen and both the kidneys companygested 6 the stomach empty and its mucosa companygested 7 the brain and its menings companygested 8 hyoid bone intact 9 urinary bladder and the gall bladder empty and 10 the chambers of the heart empty.
4 is son of accused No.
Even after her marriage, the son of accused used to go to her house and tried to create problems in her married life, because of which the son of accused was beaten by the deceased and his family members which became the subject matter of a criminal case.
Thus, it was alleged that there was inimical term between the two families.
Tender caused to PW 1 was grievous in nature and injury No.
As the elders did number agree to the proposal, the deceased married his daughter to some other person.
Bleeding present was simple in nature and those injuries companyld have been caused with sticks.
1 to 5 A 1 to A 5 accused No.
On PW 2 being questioned by A 2 as to why she was abusing them, the deceased interfered and attacked A 2.
The following external injuries were found on the dead body A three sutured injury 1 in length on the right parietal region.
1187 of 2002 filed by the appellants herein accused Nos.
Y. Eqbal, J. The present appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 9th October, 2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh partly allowing Criminal Appeal No.
As regards injuries i.e. Swelling deformity of left hand and Contusion of 1 x 2 over right shoulder blade, the doctor opined that the said injuries were simple in nature and companyld have been caused with sticks as alleged.
A blue black abrasion 3 x on the right shoulder.
