of land which is also part of the suit property.
After the evidence of witnesses of the respondent was recorded, appellant filed application under order 13 rule 2 of CPC for production of companyy of the award passed by the Land Acquisition Officer regarding the acquisition of one bigha of agricultural land in dispute, electricity bill of his house and companyy of the registered sale deed executed by the petitioner on 9.2.1987 in favour of one Nathu Ram pertaining to 900 sq.
Appellant sought to produce certified companyy of the order passed by the Land Acquisition Officer, registered sale deed and electricity bills.
2001 Supp 5 SCR 252 The following Order of the Court was delivered Leave granted.
This appeal is filed against the the judgment and order dated 27.2.2001 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur in S.B. Civil Revision No, 216 of 2001.
That order was challenged before the High Court of Rajasthan by filing Revision Petition, which was rejcted by impugned judgment and order dated 27.2.2001 by holding that there was numberreference of the said documents in the written statement and numbergood cause was shown for its number production at the relevant time.
1.50.000, Appellant submitted written statement on 18.1.1996 and denied that he was executed any such agreement to sell in favour of the respondent and that respondent has misused his signatures taken on the blank stamp paper.
The facts of the case are that respondent filed a civil suit for specific performance of agreement to sell, dated 1.8.1992, of agricultural land and residential plot for a companysideration of Rs.
Those applications filed by the appellant were rejected by the trial companyrt vide its judgment and order dated 11.1.2001 on the ground that plaintiff has closed his evidence and that defendant has neither submitted his own affidavit number has made out a good cause for late production of the said documents.
