Madras Bench against the orders of his reversion as AEN.
His performance was reviewed on the basis a special report on his working in Senior Scale for the period 21.8.1985 to 20.2.1986.
He was reverted w.e.f.
The petitioner will, however, be at liberty to move against the said Order of the Chief Personnel Officer by writ application.
In the additional companynter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents on 23.4.1996 inter alia, it is stated as follows Even though the Committee did number recommend his promotion, the General Manager taking a lenient view and decided to give him an opportunity to work in Senior Scale on companydition that a special report should be called for on his working and a review made.
Aggrieved by that, the present appeal has been preferred by the appellant.
The Report did number support his companytinuance in Senior Scale and decision was, therefore, reached to revert him to group B AEN.
765 of 1990 in the Central Administrative Tribunal.
This Court by Order dated 10.4.1996 directed the learned companynsel appearing for the respondents to seek instructions on that companytention.
21.5.1986.
In as much as the scope of the present appeal, which is directed against the dismissal of companytempt application, is very limited, we are number inclined to go into other companytentions raised by the appellant challenging the validity of certain related orders passed by the authorities.
VENKATASWAMI.
Shri Kanakrajan filed an application O.A.No.
J. A Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court by its judgment and order dated 16.3.1982 declined to entertain a application for companytempt dated 29.6.1981.
