Subsequent to his resignation as Managing Director, he was appointed as the Managing Director of Ex Cello Ltd., respondent No.
By virtue of his employment with respondent No.
1495/2007 against API Ltd. and Her Highness Vijaya Raje Scindia, Maharani of Gwalior, alleging that Mr. C. B. Saran had executed a sub tenancy in favour of her mother and Mr. C. B. Saran was inducted in the suit premises as a tenant by API Ltd. in or about June, 1968 on a monthly rental of Rs.
1 the suit premises was allotted in his favour and the appellant number 1 being sister of Mr. Sanjay Saran and appellant number 2 being his nephew companytinued to stay in the suit premises.
1 companypany to demand possession of the suit premises.
1, were substituted in the said suit.
Page 4 of 19 The respondent number 1 instituted a proceeding on 04.03.2004 under section 630 of the Act which was numbered as CC No.
1400/ .
The appellants were directed to vacate the suit premises within 4 months from the date of said order and in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 4 months.
The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate vide order dated 26.06.2007 found the appellants guilty under Section 630 of the Act and a sentence of Rs.
1 died on 29.11.2007 her appeal stood abated.
Small Causes Court against the respondent number 1 and Mr. C. B. Saran being suit number 206/519 of 1976 disputing the tenancy right in relation to the suit property.
It is pertinent to mention here that in the year 1976 API Ltd. filed a suit before Ld.
The suit premises was owned by Her Highness Vijaya Raje Scindia Maharani of Gwalior and was taken on lease by the API Ltd. for the residential needs of its employee.
Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. Leave Granted.
Against the said dismissal the two appellants preferred a criminal revision application before the High Court of Bombay.
However, Mr. C. B. Saran resigned as Managing Director and later on also as its Director.
In the later suit status quo order was passed which was extended subsequently.
In terms of the said letter Mr. Sanjay Saran vacated the premises but however the appellants companytinued to hold the possession of the said premises and refused to surrender the possession.
74/SS/2005 against the present appellants and mother of appellant number 1.
On 20.03.2002 the respondent number 1 also issued a letter to Mr. Sanjay Saran stating that they are in need of the premises and the suit premises should be vacated.
The request of Mr. C.B. Saran was companysidered favourably in the Board Meeting dated 12.06.1968 in which Mr. Saran was also present as a Director.
The appellants also filed a suit before the Small Causes Court being A.D Suit No.
After the demise of Mr. C. B. Page 3 of 19 Saran his legal heirs, including the appellant No.
5,000/ was imposed on each of the accused appellant with default stipulation of simple imprisonment for 15 days.
On the other hand, the present appellants along with Smt.
502/2004.
Another suit was filed by the appellants before the Small Causes Court being R.A.D. Suit No.
Being aggrieved by the said order the appellants filed a criminal appeal before the Sessions Judge which was dismissed.
Minal Saran since deceased , mother of appellant No.1 and Mr. Sanjay Saran challenged the right of respondent No.
Accordingly, Mr. C. B. Saran along with his family, which companysisted of his wife, son and daughter, companytinued to occupy the said premises.
The learned Single Judge heard the parties on merits and dismissed the appeal.
Mr. C. B. Saran expired in Germany on 16.07.1980 and on his demise his son Mr. Sanjay Saran, who was Joint Managing Director became the Managing Director of the respondent number 1 companypany.
As the mother of appellant No.
It is against the said order that the appellants have approached this Court.
1 herein.
