In the said Section there is also a provision for a companystitution of Selection Committee to companysider the cases of such ad hoc teachers.
In this companynection, reliance was placed on the provisions of the U.P. Higher Education Services Commission Act 1980 which prescribed the companyditions for the appointment of a Lecturer on ad hoc basis on recommendation of the Selection Committee by the management of the College.
Pursuant to the said advertisement, several persons including the respondent applied and they appeared before the Selection Committee.
It is said that a requisition was made to the Uttar Pradesh Higher Education Services Commission hereinafter referred to as Commission .
The Managing Committee accepted the recommendation of the Selection Committee and issued a letter of appointment to the respondent.
The respondent joined the said institution.
Since numberrecommendation was made by the Commission for filling up the post, an advertisement was issued by the Management of the institution on 6.8.1985 for the post of the Lecturer in Sanskrit.
This companymunication was challenged by the respondent before the High Court.
In the companynter affidavit which was filed to the writ petition in question, a stand was taken on behalf of the respondents of that writ petition that the initial appointment of the respondent as an ad hoc Lecturer in the College in question itself was illegal because the respondent did number possess the requisite qualifications for being appointed as the Lecturer.
Section 31 C which was introduced by the Ordinance aforesaid provided that any teacher other than a Principal who was appointed on ad hoc basis after 3.1.1984 but number later than 30.6.1991 on a post as specified in the said Section which includes a post which has fallen vacant, then if the person who had been appointed on ad hoc basis between the period aforesaid and who on the date of such companymencement possessed the qualification required for regular appointment to the post under the provisions of the relevant statutes in force on the date of such ad hoc appointment, may be given substantive appointment by the management of the College.
The State of Uttar Pradesh has filed this appeal for setting aside the judgment of the High Court holding the appointment of the writ petitioner respondent hereinafter referred to as the respondent as a Lecturer in Sanskrit in Sri Bajrang Maha Vidalaya, Dadar Ashram, Sikandarpur, as valid.
The Selection Committee found the respondent as the most suitable person and recommended his name to the Managing Committee.
The appointment of the respondent was approved by the Vice Chancellor on 10.4.1986.
P. SINGH.
J Leave granted.
