The Labour Court did number accept the stand and held that the termination was bad and the companycerned applicants were entitled for reinstatement.
It is number in dispute that the appellant Corporation has reinstated the respondents.
Such adjudication was challenged before the High Court which dismissed the writ application.
The Labour Court did number accept the stand and directed payment.
2958 of 2000 ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. These appeals involve identical issues and are therefore disposed of by this companymon judgment.
Appellant Corporation took the stand that they were number its employees and, in fact, were employees of independent companytractors.
With C.A. No.
A brief reference to the factual position which is almost undisputed would suffice Respondents who claimed to be employee of the appellant Corporation claimed before the Labour Court, Hyderabad in short the Labour Court that their services were illegally terminated.
2957 of 2000 and C.A. No.
Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation in short the Corporation calls in question legality of the judgments rendered by the High Court holding that the respondent in each of the appeals was entitled to back wages.
