Thereby, he opined that the milk purchased from the appellant was an adulterated milk.
He sent the sample for analysis on March 21, 1983.
500/ Thus this appeal by special leave.
The appellant is a milk vendor.
On the basis of the said report, the prosecution was laid against the appellant.
The Analyst in his report dated March 30, 1983 found that the milk fat was 4.8 and milk solids number fat was 6.36 whereas the prescribed standard for milk fat is 4.5 and milk solids number fat 8.5.
61/91, the Single Judge by judgment dated March 30, 1991 companyfirmed the companyviction but the sentence was reduced to a period of 3 months and a fine of Rs.
1,000/ .
On March 19, 1983, the Food Inspector took samples of milk from the custody of the appellant under Section 10 7 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for short the Act .
Arising out of S.L.P. c No.
2292/92 1994 2 SCR 62 ORDER Special leave granted.
On appeal, it was companyfirmed and in Revision No.
