But the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal exercising powers of revision under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Vidarbha Region Act, 1958 preferred the word of the appellant and disturbed the finding of fact recorded by the two tribunals below.
The appellant on the other hand relied on the entries of crop inspection register from the years 1940 41 to the years 1949 50.
The case of Basanti Bai and her daughter was that the appellant was their servant and had executed deeds in their favour in the form of Nokar names and Ikrarnamas from time to time.
The dispute as raised by the appellant, number dead and represented, was that he is a tenant under Basanti Bai and her daughter, the respondents herein.
Basanti Bai is by number dead and represented by her daughter, the only respondent number.
The first two tribunals in the Revenue hierarchy decided against the appellant.
Nokar names and Ikrarnamas are of a later period.
