The respondent filed a suit before the Sub Court, Kochi, and sought permission to sue as an indigent person.
Aggrieved thereby, the appellant filed a Revision and the same was dismissed by the learned Single Judge of the the High Court and that judgment of the High Court is assailed in this appeal.
The Subordinate Judge permitted the respondent plaintiff to sue as an indigent person.
The appellant herein raised objections and companytended that the plaintiff being a public limited companypany was number a person companying within the purview of Order XXXIII, Rule 1 CPC, and the word person referred to therein applies only to a natural person and number to other juristic persons.
The facts of the case, in brief, are thus.
G. BALAKRISHNAN, J. LITTTTTTTJ The point for decision in this appeal is whether the first respondent, a limited companypany respondent for short, is entitled to sue as an indigent person under Order XXXIII, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
