That order was upheld by the learned Sessions Judge on a revision petition against it filed jointly by the first informant in the case and by the widow of the murdered person.
The aggrieved party, Mahesh Desai, also has companye up by special leave and both these appeals are disposed of by this judgment.
These private parties pursued the matter further and applied to the High Court in revision.
Then Phagu, Jalo and Haricharan Dusadh of Bagdigi began to talk with him near the Jeep.
Thereafter Mahesh Desai went away by his Jeep and Phagu, Jalo and Haricharan came back.
The prosecution was launched on the first information of one Ram Naresh Pandey as against 28 persons about the companymission of the murder of one Nand Kumar Chaubey, a peon of a companyliery in Bagdigi, companymitted in the companyrse of a serious riot on February 20, 1954.
in the companyrse of which Phagu, Jalo and Haricharan Dusadh, along with others were said to have chased Nand Kumar Chaubey and wherein Phagu gave a pharsa blow and Haricharan a lathi blow to him and Nand Kumar Chaubey fell down dead.
As regards what is said to have transpired at 6 30 p.m. and 7 30 p.m., it appears to be reasonably clear that the person who gave the information to the informant was Jadubans Tiwary and that his information itself was probably based on what Sheoji Singh and Ramdhar Singh had told him.
Mahesh Desai said to them You go to your respective works and see that numberone works there happen what may.
The meeting dispersed at about 7 30 oclock.
10 and told the labourers there to stick to their strike.
This was said to have resulted from differences between two rival labour unions in companynection with a strike.
You remain prepared in every respect.
In this morning Phagu Dusadh, Jalo Dusadh, Chamari Dusadh and others were sic took part.
Mahesh Desai went by his Jeep from Mahabir Asthan to pit No.
The labourers of Lodna will also companye to your help.
The police will number be able to do any harm to you.
Jagannadhadas, J. These appeals arise out of an order of discharge passed by the Subordinate Judge Magistrate of Dhanbad under s. 494 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on his companysenting to the withdrawal of the Public Prosecutor from a prosecution pending before him in so far as it was against the appellant Mahesh Desai, one of the accused therein.
