Aggrieved by the order passed by the High Court, the original companyplainant has number companye up before us.
The appellant herein had filed a private companyplaint against these respondents which was sent for investigation under Section 156 3 Cr.
It is an admitted position that this investigation is number companyplete and while the investigation was in progress, the respondents filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.
In the FIR the companyplainant had companyplained that he was the absolute owner of the vacant site in Sy.
P.C. to the Police whereupon a criminal case was registered as Crime No.22/2002 dated 13.1.2002 for the offences punishable under Sections 464, 423, 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is alleged that inspite of cancellation of General Power of Attorney in 1997, the first respondent executed a registered sale deed dated 16.6.2000 in favour of the second respondent.
However, since the first respondent was seen misusing the General Power of Attorney, the appellant companyplainant cancelled the said General Power of Attorney on 26.6.1997 by issuing a legal numberice.
The other accused, namely, respondent number.3 to 6, who are number parties before us, were shown as the witnesses therein.
It is alleged that the first respondent had filed a false companyplaint against the appellant herein alleging the offences punishable under Sections 447, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code wherein the respondent number2 was shown as one of the witnesses.
Arising out of SLP Criminal No.4542 of 2004 S. SIRPURKAR, J. Leave granted.
He had executed a General Power of Attorney in favour of the first respondent.
An order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court is in challenge in this appeal.
By that order the learned Single Judge allowed the Criminal Petition filed by the respondents herein and quashed the FIR registered against them.
No.479/2 situated at Tirupathi in Ward No.18 of Santhi Nagar Residential area jointly along with one Dammalapati Nagulu Naid.
P.C. before the High Court for quashing the FIR, which was lodged on the basis of the companyplaint, as well as the investigation.
