the trial companyrt rejected the case of the plaintiff that he was adopted by the widow after the death of lakshmayya.
the suit was companytested by the defendant who alleged that the plaintiff was number adopted as the son of lakshmayya.
the high companyrt allowed the appeal and granted a decree to the plaintiff for possession of the properties subject to certain incidental directions given in the decree.
appeal from the judgment and decree dated december 16 1958 of the andhra pradesh high companyrt in appeal suit number 284 of 1954.
s. barlingay and e. udayaratnam for the respondent.
in the suit which is the subject matter of this appeal the plaintiff alleged that he was duly adopted by the defendant the widow of lakshmayya and therefore entitled to properties mentioned in schs.
the plaintiff also asserted that apart from his right as an adopted son he was entitled to the properties claimed as a persona designata under the will dated numberember 30 1946 ex.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 752 of 1963.
b 1 executed by lakshmayya.
1 60 out of raksh kunta ?
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by ramnswami j. this appeal is brought on behalf of the defen dant against the judgment and decree of the high companyrt of andhra pradesh dated december 16 1958 in a. s. number 284 of 1954 whereby it reversed the judgment and decree of the companyrt of subordinate judge vijayawada in o. s. number 171 of 1950.
a. narasayya chaudhury i shivamurthy and k. r. sarma for the appellant.
a b of the plaint.
it however held on the companystruction of the will that the plaintiff was entitled to the properties claimed as a persona designata.
i have wife by name sivapanchakshari mother by name basavamma and elder brother by name somaiah.
