The High Court also held that if appellant herein fails to pay the said amount, respondent No.1 is at liberty to approach the District Magistrate, G.B. Nagar, Noida for realizing the said amount from the respondent College as arrears of land revenue.
Subsequently, the appellant College cancelled the admission of respondent No.1 and refunded the entire fee of Rs.59,715/ deposited by him on the same day.
with Maths eligibility with minimum 60 marks.
On 03.12.2007, when his application was forwarded to the University for 3rd Semester Examinations, it refused to issue admit card to appear in the examination, since he was number having the required percentage of marks i.e. 60.
The appellant College relying on the declaration made by respondent No.1 in the admission form that he is having 60 marks in the qualifying subjects though actually he secured 56 admitted him in B.Tech Computer Science for the Second Year 3rd Semester by taking the requisite fee.
1110 of 2009, whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants herein and companyfirmed the order dated 01.07.2009 of the learned Single Judge in Civil Writ Petition No.
3465 of 2008.
On 21.08.2007, the appellant College published a numberice in the daily Hindi Newspaper Dainik Jagran inviting applications against lapsed vacant seats for the Session 2007 08 for various branches including admission for Second Year 3rd Semester of Engineering for Diploma Holders B.Sc.
At the same time, admission in the First Year 1st Semester of the aforesaid branches was also going on in which the minimum qualification was 102 with 50 marks.
3465 of 2008 before the High Court praying for a direction to the University to permit him to appear in the examination or to pay a companypensation of Rs.
10 lakhs to him.
Being dissatisfied, the appellants have preferred the above appeal by way of special leave.
Learned Single Judge of the High Court, vide order dated 01.07.2009, treating the writ petition as that of a Public Interest Litigation allowed the writ petition in part and held that since respondent No.1 herein does number possess the minimum qualification for appearing in the 3rd Semester of Tech Computer Science rejected his prayer to appear in the examination but in order to companypensate him for the loss suffered directed the appellant College to pay a companypensation of Rs.
Being aggrieved by the order of the learned Single Judge, the appellant College filed an appeal being Special Appeal No.
In pursuance of the aforesaid numberice, Manish Kumar respondent No.1 applied for admission in 3rd Semester for the companyrse of B.Tech Computer Science in the appellant College.
It further held that respondent No.3 University shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings against the appellant College for granting admission to respondent No.1.
The Division Bench, by order dated 03.08.2009, dismissed the appeal of the appellants.
In this way, according to the appellant College, respondent No.1 has companycealed the relevant facts.
5 lakhs to him within six weeks from the date of the order.
Brief facts Priyadarshini College of Computer Science Appellant No.1 herein hereinafter referred to as the appellant College is a recognized institution and is affiliated with the Uttar Pradesh Technical University, Lucknow and is imparting technical education for various branches including Tech Computer Science , B.Tech Electronics Communication , B.Tech Information Technology and B.Tech Electronics Instrumentation .
1110 of 2009 before the Division Bench of the High Court.
Sathasivam, J. Leave granted.
This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 03.08.2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Special Appeal No.
Aggrieved by the same, in January, 2008, respondent No.1 filed a petition being Writ Petition No.
