275/ paid by the Mandali to the Sangh on July 13, 1057 towards the price of the manure was misappropriated by the appellant.
475/ The case of the prosecution is that a sum of Rs.
The order of companyviction and sentence was companyfirmed in appeal by the Sessions Court and in revision by the High Court.
The rejection by the High Court of the bulk of the evidence led by the prosecution has furnished to the appellant an argument that the High Court, after rejecting the evidence of the prosecution, has made out a new case and has companyfirmed the companyviction on an altogether different charge.
The appellant was working as the Secretary of a Co operative Society which is briefly referred to in the judgment of the High Court as the Sangh Another society referred to as the Mandali had purchased 10Q maunds of manure from the Sangh for Rs.
V. Chandrachud, J. This to an appeal by special leave against the judgment rendered by the High Court of Gujarat in Criminal Revision Application No.
700/ .
