01.01.1986.
In pursuance of above suggestion, a Committee had been set up by Department of Electronics in November, 1986.
1 and 2 is that they were initially appointed as Junior Machine Operators JMO Key Punch Operators w.e.f.
Being aggrieved respondent number.1 and 2 preferred O.A. No.3690 of 2011 before the CAT for re fixation of their pay in the scale of Rs.1150 1500 w.e.f.
27.07.1995 and they were adjusted against the post of Computor on their request, they are number entitled to refixation of their pay with effect from their date of initial appointment.
Similarly, the post of Computor in the pre revised scale of Rs.1200 2040 was re designated as DEO, Grade B in the scale of pay of Rs.1350 2200 effective from 01.01.1986.
Accordingly, the post of Junior Machine Operator in the pre revised scale of Rs.950 1500 was re designated as DEO, Grade A and was granted the scale of pay of Rs.1150 1500 w.e.f.
By the impugned order, the High Court affirmed the order dated 17th March, 2012 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench hereinafter referred to as, the CAT and dismissed the writ petition preferred by the appellants herein.
were created.
19.05.1989.
On 18.05.1999, at the time of granting First Financial Upgradation under ACP Scheme, the pay of the respondents was re fixed in the same scale of Rs.4000 100 6000, which was the scale they were already granted.
F.7 1 IC/86 44 dated 11th September, 1989 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure whereby on the recommendation of the Fourth Central Pay Commission and further recommendation made by the Committee companystituted by the Government of India, pay scale of Electronic Data Processing posts likewise Key Punch Operator, Punch Verifying Operator, Planning Assistant, etc.
Later on, their services were regularized w.e.f.
04.11.1997 in the pay scale of Rs.4000 100 6000.
F.7 1 IC/86 44 Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Expenditure Implementation Cell New Delhi, dated 11th Sept 89 OFFICE MEMORANDUM Sub Rationalisation of pay scales of Electronic Data Processing posts The undersigned is directed to refer to the recommendations of Fourth Central Pay Commission companytained in paragraph 11.45 of the Report wherein it was suggested that the department of Electronic should examine and suggest reorganisation of existing Electronic Data Processing posts and prescribe uniform pay scales and designations in companysultation with the Department of Personnel.
Therefore, the respondents though hold the posts of Computor they were entitled to the pay scale of Rs.1150 1500 w.e.f.
However, on the request of the respondents, their services were adjusted against the vacant posts of Computor feeder which was a promotional post but with the companydition that the respondents will draw only the salary and pay and allowances as admissible to the posts of Junior Machine Operator which they were holding prior to 27.07.1995.
In the meantime, companysequent upon the introduction of the Scheme of rationalization of pay scales for Electronic Data Processing cadre, the cadre was restructured and at the entry level Data Entry Operator DEO Grade A and above that the post of Data Entry Operator DEO Grade B, etc.
were abolished and, therefore, they were adjusted to the post of Computor.
T.V.L.N. Mallikarjuna Rao, C.A.No.10862 of 2014 etc.
05.05.1987 and 19.05.1987 respectively on temporary basis in the pay scale of Rs.950 20 1150 EB 25 1500.
Therefore, respondent number.1 and 2 became entitled to receive salary in the pay scale of Rs.1150 1500 with effect from their date of initial appointment i.e. 05.05.1987 and 19.05.1987 respectively.
The question relating to rationalisation of pay scales of Electronics Data Processing posts in different departments of Ministries of the Government of India was numbericed and companysidered by this Court in Secretary, Department of Personnel, Public Grievances Pension Anr.
In the present case the respondents were appointed as Junior Machine Operator Key Punch Operator w.e.f.
This Court by its judgment dated 9th December, 2014 in the said case numbericed the Office Memorandum No.
Admittedly, the posts of Junior Machine Operator, etc.
Subsequently, on the recommendations of the Economic Reform Commission and the Staff Inspection Unit, the posts of Junior Machine Operator, Senior Machine Operator and Comptometer Operator in the office of appellant number2 were abolished w.e.f.
27.07.1995.
Later on, respondents were adjusted against the vacant post of Computor by way of ad hoc promotion w.e.f.
It appears that inspite of re designation of the post of Junior Machine Operator as Data Entry Operator Grade A the respondent number.1 and 2 were number granted scale of pay of Rs.1150 1500 with effect from their date of initial appointment.
Though the respondents were adjusted against the posts of Computor w.e.f.04.11.1997, the adjustment was so made with a companydition that they have been drawing the salary and pay and allowances as admissible to the posts of Junior Machine Operator which they were holding prior to 27th July, 1995.
The relevant portion of the said office memorandum reads as follows No.
SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. Leave granted.
We have companysidered the rival companytention raised by the learned companynsel for the parties and have perused the record.
The appellants have preferred this appeal against order dated 1st August, 2013 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in W.P. C No.2736 of 2013.
01.01.1986.
AB 14017/75/89 Estt.
The factual matrix of the case is as under The case of the Respondent Nos.
27.07.1995.
were rationalized.
