By the said amendment, appointment of emergency Commissioned Officers ECOs and Short Service Commissioned Officers of the Armed forces of the Union was introduced as one of the modes of recruitment.
The Delhi High Court by its decision dated September 2, 1985 in W. No.
It is to be numbered, the petitioner were also parties in Sahis case.
Later on, it was companyceded that they would companye under the category of Army Officers.
By Notification No.
The first respondent, according to the petitioners, purporting to implement the order of this Court in Sahis case, had prepared a seniority list ignoring the relevant provisions of law which had affected their seniority.
The reason for this is that the petitioners have been treated as a separate source of recruitment for the Central Reserve Police Force, 1955 after their amendment.
Inter alia, the issue relating to the application of Emergency Commissioned Officers and Short Service Commissioned Officers Reservation and Vacancies Rules, 1967 for short 1967 Rules was also companysidered by the Delhi High Court.
In Civil Appeal Nos.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition of the direct recruits.
Thereafter, the Union of India and the direct recruits moved this Court.
When the past service in the Army by the ECOs was ignored in the matter of seniority and promotion, they moved the Delhi High Court for necessary directions to the respondents 1 and 2 to include their past Army service for the purpose of seniority and companysequential promotion.
F/2/4/67.P II dated May 11, 1967 issued by Ministry of Home Affairs, an amendment to Rule 105 was introduced by adding Clause iv A to Rule 105.
1909 1911/89.
The CRPF Rules were framed in the year 1955 to deal with various matters.
and for other companysequential reliefs as well.
It is the case of the petitioners that this Court in C. SAHIS case had expressly directed the first respondent to revise the seniority list, if necessary, after hearing the officers companycerned, in accordance with law.
The learned Judges categorically held as follows However, we think that these reservation Rules have numberapplication to the case of petitioners ECOs .
