This order was challenged in the High Court, which by its judgment and order dated 11 9 1985 allowed the writ petition and held that the Commissioner had numberjurisdiction to hear and decide the revision filed by the appellants.
Against that order a revision was filed before the Commissioner, who by his order dated 4 2 1980, allowed the revision and directed that an enquiry be made to ascertain if the land in question was in actual physical possession of the appellants.
Appeal filed against the aforesaid orders of the Anchal Adhikari was dismissed by the Deputy Commissioner, Land Reforms on 7 5 1976.
Relying upon Section 8 of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 and Rule 8 framed there under, the High Court held that the Commissioner had numberjurisdiction to entertain a revision against the order of the Collector.
Thereafter, the appellants filed appeal before the Collector, Rohtak who dismissed the appeal on 22 6 1977.
The case has a chequered litigative history but we pick up the thread from 1973 when the present appellants before us initiated a case for mutation of their names which was rejected by the Anchal Adhikari, Bhabhua.
It is against this order that the present appeal has been filed.
