259 of 1964 and the respondent in C.A. No.
Appeals from the judgment and order dated October 27, 1961 of the Bombay High Court in Special Civil Application No.
V. Gupte, Solicitor General, Ganapathy Iyer and B. R. K. Achar, for the appellants in C.A. No.
259 and 260 of 1964.
8 and Note 5 of the Statement accompanying that resolution, should be quashed by a writ of certiorari or by some other writ or order.
226 of the Constitution, filed by three First Grade clerks attached to the offices of the Collectors of Wardha, Bhandara and Chanda districts.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Hidayatullah, J. This judgment will also dispose of Civil Appeal No.
They are the three respondents in this appeal.
42 of 1961.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeals Nos.
260 of 1964 .
D. Kharkhanis and A. G. Ratnaparkhi, for the respondent in C.A. No.
The petition in the High Court was originally filled by two of these respondents as Secretary and Member of the Ministerial Services Associations, Wardha and Bhandara respectively but they were treated as petitions on their personal behalf.
The petitioners asked for a writ of mandamus against the Government of Bombay for the equation of their posts with Aval Karkuns in the State of Bombay later the State of Maharashtra under ss.
SR INT 1057/VI dated October 21, 1957, together with Item No.
259 of 1964 and appellant in C.A. No.
260 of 1964 .
These appeals arise from a judgment dated October 27, 1961 of the High Court of Bombay in a petition under Art.
260 of 1964.
133 of the Constitution and the two rival appeals have, therefore, been filed by the three petitioners and the State Government questioning the judgment of the High Court in so far as it goes respectively against them.
