9973 to 9977 of 1983 Appeals by Special leave from the Judgment and Order dated the 31st January, 1983 of the Patna High Court in C.W C. Nos.
3556 of 1982.
AND Writ Petition Civil Nos.
9973/83.
In May, 1981 another writ petition was filed in the High Court mainly challenging the release of lands on 24.5.80 in favour of Pandey families on the ground that the said release was violative of Art.
9974/83.
companysiderations which led the Government to single out Pandey families for favourable treatment.
Sometime in July, 1977 the State Ministry of Revenue and Industry companyfirmed the acquisition.
In the year 1978, a representation was made by Mr. Thakur Prasad who took over as the new Minister of Industries after the general elections, about the acquisition to the Chief Minister who stayed further proceedings in the matter.
8.30 crores was to be disbursed to the various owners whose lands were sought to be acquired.
Unfortunately, thereafter on 8.11.76 a representation was made by Mr. Ram Avtar Shastri, Member of Parliament, for withdrawing the acquisition proceedings, which was disposed of and dismissed in December, 1976.
According to the estimate, a sum of Rs.
N. Singh, K. P. Verma, Advocate General and Jaya Narayan P. Singh In WP.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.
3098 of 1983 From the Judgment and Order dated the 31st January, 1983 of the Patna High Court in C.W.J.C. No.
2104 of 1982.
4428 OF 1983.
S. Jauhar and S.N. Misra ADVOCATES FOR RESPONDENTS S. Nariman, Ram Balak Mahto, Advocate General, B.P. Singh and Ranjit Kumar in CA.
ADVOCATES FOR THE APPELLANTS P. Bhatt and A. K. Srivastava in CA.
While the matter was nearing companypletion preparations for the 1977 general elections were made as a result of which the entire matter was deferred and put into companyd storage.
P. Singh and B.B. Singh in CA.
WITH Special Leave Petition Civil No.
So far so good.
On 24.5.80, which is a crucial date as it appears to be the subject matter of the present appeals and writ petitions, a portion of land companyprising 4.03 acres belonging to some influential persons, viz.,
S. Cihitale, L.R. Singh and Gopal Singh for the Appellants.
On 14.4.76 numberification under s. 9 of the Act was issued.
By virtue of the said numberification objections were called and on 12.2.76 all the objections were disposed of.
14 and therefore the entire numberification was bad and without jurisdiction.
After this, rate report was prepared which was accepted by the Collector who gave his final estimate and sent the same to the Government in January, 1977.
On 19.5.76 as many as 500 objections were filed.
4288 of 1983.
A declaration under s. 6 of the Act was issued which was published on 20.2.76.
Ultimately, on 12.12.77 in order to smoothen the way for the acquisition of the lands in question, the Central Government exempted purely agricultural lands from acquisition under the Urban Land Ceiling Act.
K. Sen and M. P. Jha in CA No.
Badri Sahu, R.S. Pandey and his relations hereinafter referred to as Pandey families was released.
ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER IN SLP NO.
13306 21 and 13346 P. Verma, Advocate General and R.P. Singh in SLP.
On 25.3.76 the publication was received by the Department and numberices were issued under s. 7 of the Act for filing claims.
It is number clear what were the.
4428 of 1983 From the Judgment and Order dated the 31st January, 1983 of the Patna High Court in C.W.J.C. No.
In the mean time, a writ petition was filed in the High Court which was ultimately withdrawn by the petitioners and the stay was vacated by the Government sometime in early 1980.
In January, 1982, the amount of companypensation was deposited by the State Housing Board with the Treasury which was followed by an Award given in respect of the acquired lands on 1.2.83.
Under article 32 of the Constitution of India.
9973/83.
9975/83.
AND Special Leave Petition Civil No.
13306 21, 13346 of 1983 and 13229 of 1984 and 1324 42 of 1984.
2170, 3435, 3879, 3436 and 3561 of 1982.
