This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 5th of February, 2008 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Calcutta in W.P.C.T.No.758 of 2007, whereby the High Court had passed an order in favour of the respondent relating to the appointment of the respondent in Group D Post of the Employees State Insurance Corporation.
5 and 6 on that ground in Group D post of the Employees State Insurance Corporation but had refused to accept the claim of the respondent for appointment.
Feeling aggrieved, an appeal was filed against the order of the High Court by way of a special leave petition which on grant of leave was heard in presence of the learned companynsel for the parties.
5 and 6 were given appointment on companypassionate ground.
The Tribunal was approached by the respondent when the Tribunal directed the authorities to produce records relating to companypassionate appointment of respondent Nos.
The High Court also directed the authorities to produce the records and since the records were number produced, the application was dismissed.
Perhaps for this reason, records were called for by the Tribunal, but records were number produced and for that reason the Tribunal had taken an adverse decision and directed appointment of the respondent for number production of the records relating to appointment of the respondent and also respondent Nos.
An application was filed before the companycerned Tribunal for appointment on companypassionate ground, however, the authorities had appointed respondent Nos.
5 and 6 and also the respondent.
5 and 6.
Leave granted.
It is number in dispute that respondent Nos.
