The Presiding Officer of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.2 , Dhanbad in the Award dated 15th May, 1988 held that the dispute raised by the Labour union on behalf of the companycerned workmen was number stale as the matter was being pursued by the union due to the stoppage of work by the companycerned workmen.
Whether the demand raised by Koyla Mazdoor Sabha in regard to alleged discrimination in employment regularization of 125 casual workers of Repair and Maintenance Section Civil of Bhurkunda Colliery of Central Coalfields Limited is justified?
It was admitted by the union that 21 workmen left the services and companysequently the number was reduced from 125 to 104.
1601 OF 2005 Employers in relation to the Management of Bhurkunda Colliery of M s Central Coalfields Ltd., Ranchi Appellant Versus Their Workmen represented by the General Secretary, Koyla Mazdoor Sabha, Bhurkunda Bazar, Ranchi Respondent Dalveer Bhandari, J The main companycept of regularization of Indian Industrial jurisprudence is the subject matter of adjudication in these Civil Appeals.
As such, the management was directed to enlist those 74 workers as casual workmen and be provided with different jobs in Category I and they may be regularized after they have fulfilled the companydition of attendance in a year.
The Labour union took up the matter of the companycerned 125 Civil Engineering Workers on the ground that the services of these workers should be regularized.
The learned Single Judge, who heard these three writ petitions did number interfere with the Award of the Tribunal.
On persuasion of the union, with initial resistance, ultimately, the Home Ministry of Government referred the dispute to the Tribunal for adjudication.
The union raised a demand that instead of regularizing the services of the workers, the management retrenched the companycerned workmen.
This gave rise to an industrial dispute.
The management filed C.W.J.C. No.1175 of 1989 and labour union filed C.W.J.C. No.1083 of 1991 and Koyla Mazdoor Sabha on behalf of 51 persons, who were number granted any relief in the award, also filed C.W.J.C. No.680 of 1999 and all the three writ petitions were heard together by the learned Single Judge.
WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.
The Award of the Tribunal was challenged.
If so, what relief are these workmen entitled?
