The petition was rejected on the short ground that under Art.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated February 25, 1965 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Misc.
843 of 1966.
226 of the Constitution praying for a writ of certiorari for quashing a numberification issued in pursuance of sub sec.
Niren De, Addl.
N. Dikshit, K. L. More and R. N. Dixit, for the appellant.
72 of 1965.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
S. Shukla, for respondent No.
The High Court summarily dismissed the petition under Art.
He claims to have a right to companytest the election to any Assembly or Parliamentary companystituency in the State of Madhya Pradesh.
petition No.
72 of 1965.
2 was its Chairman and respondents Nos.
Solicitor General, R. Ganapathy layer and H. Dhebar and B. R. G. K. Achar, for respondents Nos.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Mitter, J. This is an appeal by special leave from a judgment and order dated February 25, 1965 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur in Miscellaneous Petition No.
The impugned numberification which was published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary on July 24, 1964 shows Ujjain as a Constituency ,reserved for the scheduled castesIt was made in pursuance of sub s. 1 to s. 10 of the Delimitation Commission Act, 1962 and recites that proposals of the Delimitation Commission for the delimitation of Parliamentary and Assembly companystituencies in the State of Madhya Pradesh had been published on October 15, 1963 in the Gazette of India and in the official gazette of the State of Madhya Pradesh and that after companysidering all objections and suggestions the Commission determined that the territorial companystituencies into which the State of Madhya Pradesh shall be divided for the purpose of elections to the House of the People and the extent of each such companystituency shall be as shown in Table.
A. Respondent No.
1 to the petition was the Delimitation Com mission, respondent No.
3 and 4 were its members.
