These were registered as O.A. Nos.
The applications of the individual GDSs were allowed by the Tribunal.
decided on 24th November, 2015.
Hence these maters are directed to be detagged from this batch of appeals.
The said circular provided that service rendered by an Extra Departmental Agent to the extent of 50 of the period thereof was to be added to the period of regular service for the purpose of entitlement to pension.
ANIRUDDHA BOSE, J. Records reveal that service is number companyplete in S.L.P. Diary No.13464/2018, S.L.P. C No.16615/2018, L.P. C No.3392/2019 and S.L.P. C Diary No.18007/2019.
The High Court directed companypliance of the said order of the Tribunal, mainly relying on an earlier judgment of the Court delivered on 6th December, 2011 in W.P. C No.
613/2015.
The scope of the dispute of that appeal would appear from the following passage of the judgment The respondent number 2 viz.
Such direction was issued by the Tribunal, inter alia, on the basis of a circular of DoPT issued in the year 1991.
N.S. Poonusamy worked as an Extra Departmental Agent in the Postal Department from the year 1968 to 1993.
The second respondent had companypleted nine years and two months of service but he was number granted any pension.
Subsequently, three applications were instituted before the Principal Bench of the Tribunal.
Let these matters be placed before the appropriate Bench after companypletion of service.
The said writ petition was disposed of by an order passed on 9 th December, 2014 giving the writ petitioners liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi.
During pendency of the appeal, however, the Central Government had issued order granting regular pension to the Respondent No.2 in that appeal.
Delay companydoned and leave is granted in SLP C CC Nos.
Aggrieved, the Union of India moved the High Court by way of a writ petition out of which these appeals have arisen.
310 of 2010 Sri Gouranga Ch.
2055720558 of 2015 and SLP C No.32881 of 2018.
Therefore, he approached the learned Tribunal which directed that a scheme be framed to give some benefit of service rendered by such employees as Extra Departmental Agents so as to enable them to earn the requisite period of qualifying service for pension i.e. 10 years.
The Tribunal, by an order passed on 6th July, 2011, upheld the applicants plea for having part of his service rendered in the capacity of GDS companyputed for meeting the requirement of qualifying service, relying on an earlier decision of the Tribunal delivered in O.A. No.
He was regularized on 01.04.1993 and retired on 31.05.2002.
Leave is also granted in rest of the petitions for Special Leave to Appeal.
The decision in that regard was delivered on 17th November 2016 Vinod Kumar Saxena Ors.
749/2015, 3540/2015 and O.A. No.
