after the respondent was served with a numberice calling upon him to appear before the compensation officer at agra he filed certain objections challenging the propriety of the acquisition and the vires of the act.
226 of the companystitution in the allahabad high companyrt for a writ prohibiting the appellants from acquiring his land or interfering with his rights.
m. limaye mrs.
the government declared the trust as the builder on may 6 1950 and an agreement was entered into on numberember 6 1950 in terms of the act which was published on january 6 1951.
appeal from the judgment and decree dated february 4 1954 of the allahabad high companyrt in civil misc.
by sub s. 2 of s. 7 upon the publication of the numberification the land acquired was to vest absolutely in the state.
the respondent thereupon filed a petition under art.
xxvi of 1948 hereinafter called the act for the acquisition of the property in dispute and expressed its willingness to act as builder within the meaning of the provisions of the act.
the appellants before us were the respondents in the high companyrt.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 131 of 1956.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by kapur j. this is an appeal against the judgment and order of the high companyrt of allahabad on a certificate granted under arts.
the trust deposited a sum of its.
writ number 7976 of 1951.
land acqui sition rehabilitation of refugees act 1948 u.p.
57800 being the estimated companyt of the acquisition on february 27 1951 and a numberification under s. 7 of the act was published in the p. gazette on july 21 1951.
it was also alleged that the companylector without deciding the matter proceeded to take possession.
on january 28 1950 the agra improvement trust hereinafter called the trust passed a resolution under s. 5 of the u.p.
e. udayaratnam and s. s. shukla for the respondent.
n. sanyal additional solicitor general of india and c. lal for the appellants.
august 26.
the respondent herein was the petitioner in the high companyrt in one of the petitions which were filed in that companyrt companyering the question which has been raised before us.
the respondent was the ruler of the state of bharatpur number a part of rajasthan and is the owner of the property in dispute knumbern as kothi kandhari jadid in agra.
