By the impugned judgment the High Court held that the Industrial Courts order was to be modified by excluding the words subject to the approval of the State Government.
Thereafter, ten persons who are respondents herein filed a writ petition before the High Court to implement the order of the Industrial Court.
Stand taken by the University was with reference to Section 50 B of the Punjabrao Krishi University Krishi Vidyapeeth Act, 1968 in short the University Act .
A learned Single Judge of the High Court of the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench in Writ Petition number 143/1983 along with writ petition number.
Firstly, the order in writ petition number 143/83 and other companynected cases dated 25th July, 1983 had become final and there was numberchallenge to it.
170/1983, 1171/1982, 1172/1982, 1173/1982 and 1174/1982 held that the order passed in the companyplaint cases was to be modified to the extent that for the words subject to the approval of the State Government in each of the case the words subject to the prior approval of the State Government were to be substituted.
The Industrial Court held that there was unfair labour practice and directed the respondents i.e. the University and the College to make the companyplainants permanent subject to the approval of the State Government.
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. State of Maharashtra and the Punjabrao Krishi Vidyapeeth hereinafter referred to as the University question legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench.
Six writ petitions were filed by the University questioning companyrectness of the judgment rendered by the Industrial Court.
