6625/ per month.
28.9.98/estab/98 Dewas dated 28.9.98 vide which he was appointed as Election Supervisor on the sanction of the Chief Election Officer M.P. the word promotion is added after until further order.
Thereafter, at the companycerned Seniority list, being at serial No.
He attained the age of superannuation on 31.12.2001.
Encl Sd Photo Copy of ACRs Collector For the Years 93 97 District Dewas M.P. The said recommendation having been accepted, he was appointed to the said post in the pay scale of Rs.
He was relieved of his duties as Election Supervisor with effect from 31.12.2001 by an Order dated 5.10.2001.
Babulal Jain, then Asst.
Photo Copy of his ACRs are enclosed.
On or about 26.12.2001, his pay was directed to be re fixed in the light of the said Office Memorandum dated 9.2.1999 as on 1.1.2000 at Rs.
The petitioner had been given the pay scale of Accountant Election Supervisor, on which post he was number promoted as per law.
He was purported to have been recommended for his alleged promotion to the post of Election Supervisor by the Collector, District Dewas MP in terms of a letter dated 25.7.1998 addressed to the Chief Electoral Officer, Bhopal in the following terms Election Supervisor posted in District Dewas has since superannuated.
For filing of this vacant post, name of Shri R.B. Puranik was recommended to be promoted to the post election supervisor vide OM Sr.
Thereafter it is recommended that Shri Babulal Jain, accountant, be promoted to the post of election supervisor.
Grade II Accountant number, Election Supervisor, Election Branch, Collecotrate, Dewas M.P. partial modification of OM Sr.
On and from 1.1.2000 he started drawing a salary of Rs.
Rest part of the order shall be effective as usual.
On or about 13.12.2000, the Collector added the word promotion in his offer of appointment by way of Corrigendum after the words until further orders In the light of the objection dated 24.10.2000 raised at the time of pay fixation of Sh.
A Writ Petition filed thereagainst has been dismissed by the High Court by reason of the impugned judgment stating It is clear from the reply that the original post of the petitioner is Asstt.
4000 100 6000 until further orders.
6000 Rs.
179 as personal pay.
The Government of Madhya Pradesh, however, issued a circular letter on or about 9.2.1999 in regard to the fixation of pay on appointment to the post involving higher duties and responsibilities, stating When any Government servant is appointed on higher post from one Department of Government to another department of the Government, the following guidelines are being issued State Government regarding pay fixation after careful companysideration Transfer from department of the Government to another on higher post shall number be treated as appointment rather posting.
Superintendent.
On being appointed on higher post the pay fixation of the companycerned Government servant shall number be fixed under FR 22 D or 22 A rather on pay being drawn by him on lower post.
Thereafter Shri Babulal Jain, accountant, vide his application dated 25.7.98 has companysented to be appointed to the post of election supervisor.
It was directed that excess amount paid to him be recovered.
26015 of 2005 B. SINHA, J. Leave granted The question which has been raised in this appeal arising out of a judgment and Order dated 27.4.2005 passed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Writ Petition Civil No.
He was later on put in the pay scale of Rs.
Arising out of S.L.P. C No.
4 Mr. Babulal Jain is senior to Mr. Puranik and experienced in election related work.
Questioning the said order, he filed an original application before the Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal.
Having regard to the fact that the appellant had filed a representation in respect of the said Order dated 13.12.2001 before the Chief Electoral Officer, Bhopal on 22.12.2001, the Tribunal in view of Section 21 b of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 dismissed the said application summarily.
4500 125 7000 with one increment as his personal pay.
2032/2003 centers around the interpretation of FR 22 D of the M.P. Civil Services CCA Rule.
1374/estab/98 dated 12.6.98.
Appellant was working as an Accountant.
