Section 81 3 may be extracted thus Presentation of petitions XX XX XX Every election petition shall be accompanied by as many companyies thereof as there are respondents mentioned in the petition, and every such companyy shall be attested by the petitioner under his own signature to be a true companyy of the petition.
From the Judgment and Order dated the 16th July, 1983 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Application No.
The respondent filed an election petition in the High Court alleging certain companyrupt practices.
53 of 83.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Special Leave Petition Civil No.
Soli J. Sorabjee, V.R. Reddy, K. Rajendra Chowdhary and Shivraj Chowdhary for the Petitioner.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by FAZAL ALI, J. This petition for special leave is directed against an interlocutory Order dated July 16, 1983 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the application of the petitioner for dismissing the election petition of the respondent in limine under s. 86 of the Representation of the People Act hereinafter referred to as the Act.
11868 of 1983.
The petitioner was declared elected to the said Assembly.
An analysis of the above reveals a that the petition should be accompanied by as many companyies as there are respondents, b that every such companyy should be attested by the petitioner under his own signature to be a true companyy of the petition.
The petition arises out of an election to the Siddipets Assembly Constituency in Andhra Pradesh which took place on January 5, 1983.
