326 327 of 2002 whereby the order passed by the Additional District Judge, Panaji in Miscellaneous Appeal No.
These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 27th March, 2003 passed by the High Court of Bombay at Goa in Writ Petition Nos.
The learned trial companyrt passed an interim order of injunction in favour of the respondent, whereagainst an appeal was preferred by the appellant.
Pursuant to or in furtherance of the said numberobjection granted by the alleged Karta of the family, which fact is denied and disputed by the respondent , the appellant No.
1 in terms of a deed dated 25th January, 1964 which was subsequently transferred to appellant No.
61 of 1998 allowing an appeal from an order of the trial companyrt in Suit No.
1 herein obtained license from the municipal authorities for carrying out the repairs.
Suffice it to state that the respondents herein filed a suit for injunction against the appellant claiming, inter alia, the following reliefs.
63/97/B refusing to pass an order of interim injunction was set aside.
The aforementioned suit for injunction was filed by the respondents at that stage.
Acting pursuant to and in furtherance of the said license the appellant herein is said to have demolished a part of the suit premises.
Having regard to the order proposed to be passed by us, it is number necessary to delve deep into the factual matrix.
1 herein in the year 1975.
Leave granted.
