When the order of police remand was number found favourable, Mr. L.N. Prashar, advocate became enraged and started hurling abuses and derogatory remarks against him.
Since the issue in all these appeals is companymon and relate to one incident, they are being disposed of by the following judgment.
By that time, Mr. L.N. Prashar, Advocate, one of the companytemnors appellants herein, who represented the accused, opposed the request of police remand.
If you have any companyrage, you companye out.
O.C.P. Nos.
Then, he requested Mr. O.P. Sharma, who is a senior member of the Bar, to request Mr. Prashar to behave properly in the Court.
You are indulging in gangism.
136 dated 13.06.1999, under Sections 393/452/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code hereinafter referred to as the IPC pertaining to Police Station Chhainsa, the Assistant Public Prosecutor requested him for remanding the accused to police custody.
You will companye to know today as to how you pass orders against me.
When he took another remand paper of the same accused, Mr. Prashar became furious and again uttered unparliamentary words and also threatened him.
It was further stated that advocates were very aggressive and wanted to assault him physically.
One of his staff members, namely, Shri Raj Kumar, Ahlmad, had informed the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridabad and the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Faridabad about the incident and they came to his Chamber and they also overheard Mr. Prashar shouting in the Court.
In companytinuation of his letter dated 14.09.1999, the Magistrate addressed another letter dated 24.09.1999 to the District Judge, Faridabad.
After hearing the arguments, the Magistrate remanded the accused to police custody.
3,4,5,18,19 and 20 of 2001 whereby the Division Bench after rejecting the claim of the appellants herein found all of them guilty of criminal companytempt and companyvicted them under Section 12 read with Sections 15 and 2 c of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 hereinafter referred to as the Act and sentenced them to various terms of simple imprisonment and fine.
I will suck your blood.
Based on the letter of the District Sessions Judge as well as letter of the Judicial Magistrate, Faridabad, the High Court took the matter by suo motu and initiated companytempt proceedings against the companytemnors under Section 2 c of the Act relating to the incident which took place on 11.09.1999 in the Court of Shri Rakesh Singh, Civil Judge, Faridabad for taking appropriate action.
Brief facts The District and Sessions Judge, Faridabad, by his letter dated 16.09.1999, addressed to the Registrar, High Court of Punjab Haryana, forwarded Letter No.
When he kept on sitting on the dias, Mr. Prashar called his fellow companyleagues including Mr. O.P. Sharma, Rajinder Sharma, Surinder Sharma, Advocates, in total about 15 20 advocates, who all belonged to the same group.
Even earlier, criminal cases are pending against me.
To avoid any further deterioration in the situation, he retired to his Chamber.
If one more case proceeds against me, it would make numberdifference.
You may call him as well.
1108 1115 of 2004 are directed against the companymon judgment and final order dated 25.08.2004 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Crl.
O.C.P. Nos.
1206 of 2004.
Sd Deponent Similar affidavits have been filed by other appellants reiterating what they had stated before the High Court and the Magistrate companycerned tendering unconditional apology for the incident which took place in the Court at Faridabad.
Sathasivam, J. Criminal Appeal Nos.
What can you do to me.
18 and 25 of 1999, Crl.
Feeling aggrieved by the order of companyviction and sentence, one Surinder Sharma has filed Crl.
376 dated 14.09.1999 written by Shri Rakesh Singh, Civil Judge Junior Division cum Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class Faridabad which was addressed to him.
Verified at New Delhi on this 28th Day of April, 2011.
In the said letter, the Judicial Magistrate has stated that on 11.09.1999 at about 3 p.m., when he was dealing with the remand of accused Soran in FIR No.
Upon hearing the remarks, he tried to pacify him and requested him to behave properly but he did number relent and again uttered unparliamentary words and also threatened him with dire companysequences.
District Sessions Judge, Faridabad came there and pacified the advocates.
I have numberfaith in your Court.
My name is L.N. Prashar.
In the said letter, it was stated that Mr. Prashar and Mr. O.P. Sharma, Advocates had criminal record and these persons have indulged in pressure tactics since long and highlighted all the details about them.
I will number leave you till High Court.
You may make companytempt against me.
After sometime, Mr. O.P. Goyal, Addl.
It was further stated that the accused Soran was being produced in four criminal cases on that very day and was being represented by Mr. Prashar in all the matters.
Bahanchod, you are companysidering this Court as inn.
As stated earlier, challenging the said companyviction and sentence, the above appeals have been filed.
However, Mr. O.P. Sharma sided with Mr. Prashar and along with other advocates shouted slogans and abused in filthy language and also threatened him.
Come out, we will just number teach you a taste of Judgeship.
