The last of such extension was granted on 16 12 1993 in Suit No.
The interim order was extended from time to time.
Stay orders have been obtained in respect of demands totaling about rupees twenty crores.
1851 of 1993.
From the Judgment and Order dated 16 12 1993 of the Delhi High Court in Suit No.
The assessee was directed to deposit the admitted liability of Rs 3,00,000 only in respect of the property, M s Grindlay Cinema Building, New Friends Colony, New Delhi.
The case of the appellant is that the assessments have been companypleted in accordance with law.
When interim order was number granted on that writ petition, he withdrew the writ petition and filed this suit.
The grievance of the appellant, Municipal Corporation of Delhi, is that an interim order has been passed in this suit by which the assessee has obtained stay of recovery of tax of nearly one crore of rupees.
Copies of the assessment orders have been annexed to the special leave petition.
Thirdly, as early as on 6 1 1984, in the case of Siliguri Municipality v. Amalendu Das this Court had vacated an interim order staying recovery of tax.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SEN, J. This appeal arises out of an interim order of stay passed by a Single Judge of the Delhi High Court dated 16 12 1993 in Suit No.
583 of 1992 , which was dismissed as withdrawn on 27 2 1992.
1851 of 1993.
Secondly, the assessee had filed a writ petition, praying for similar relief.
This suit was filed by the plaintiff, C.L. Batra, after the previous attempt to obtain interim order of stay failed on a writ petition Civil Writ Petition No.
1851 of 1993 The grievance of the appellant is that this interim order has opened a floodgate and many other suits have been filed bypassing the statutory provisions of appeal.
