The National Commission disposed off the Revision filed by the Appellants with a one paragraph Order relying upon its own decision in the case of Haryana Urban Development Authority vs. Darsh Kumar.
It held that the Respondent companyld number wait indefinitely.
He therefore filed a companyplaint before the District Forum.
It therefore directed for refund of all amounts paid with interest thereon at the rate of 18 per annum to be calculated from the date of payment till the date of actual refund.
As possession was number given, the Respondent applied for refund of his money with interest thereon.
Refund was number given to him.
The Appeal filed by the Appellants was dismissed by the State Forum on 15th September, 1997.
13072 of 2003 N. VARIAVA, J. Leave granted.
It found that there was numberpossibility of delivery of possession in the near future.
Arising out of SLP C No.
The District Forum by its Order dated 6th November, 1996 held that the Appellants were at fault in number delivering the possession for so many years.
In this case the Respondent was allotted a plot bearing No.
1803 measuring 300 Sq.
