PBW 8399, met with an accident near Oasis Tourist Complex on G. T. Road near Uchana village, Police Station Sadar Karnal, when a truck bearing registration No.
The relevant facts are stated hereunder to appreciate the case with a view to determine whether the appellant is entitled for enhancement of companypensation amount as prayed in this appeal.
Rs.6,30,000/ awarded under different heads payable to the appellant by the respondent Insurance Company.
The High Court allowed the appeal filed by the appellant and set aside the award of the Tribunal and awarded an amount of Rs.6,30,000/ to the appellant.
The appellant being the only surviving legal representative, who was the adopted child of the deceased, filed a claim petition No.89 of 1990 before the M.A.C.T., Karnal seeking for companypensation for the death of her deceased mother.
The Tribunal by its award dated 11.11.1991 dismissed the said claim petition filed by the appellant on the ground that she companyld number prove to be a legal representative of the deceased.
PIB 5733 being driven rashly and negligently by respondent number 2 companying from the opposite direction companylided with the said car.
She was 45 years of age and as per the formula prescribed in the judgment of the Honble Supreme Court in Sarla Verma Versus Delhi Transport Corporation and another 2009 6 SCC 121, the prospect of increase in salary must have been duly provided for by escalating the salary by another 30.
The relevant portion of the judgment and award of the High Court is extracted hereunder to examine the break up of figures and calculation made by the High Court before arriving at the above said companypensation amount of Rs.
262 was registered on 10.7.1990 at the Police Station, Sadar Karnal under Sections 279/337/304 A of the I.P.C. against respondent number 2 herein.
At the time of death, the deceased was said to have been working as a teacher, drawing a salary of Rs.4,214/ .
An FIR No.
Hence, the same does number require interference by this Court and prayed for dismissal of the appeal.
The appellant at the time of the accident was 15 years of age and was wholly dependent on her mother.
This appeal has been filed by the appellant being dissatisfied with the impugned Judgment and award dated 02.07.2012 passed in FAO No.1647 of 1992 O M by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh wherein the High Court has awarded the companypensation amount of Rs.6,30,000/ to the appellant.
On the night intervening 9/10.07.1990 at around 1230 a.m., Parmod Bala, mother of the appellant, who along with five other passengers were travelling in a Maruti Car bearing registration No.
GOPALA GOWDA, J. Delay companydoned.
Leave granted.
Aggrieved by the said award of the Tribunal, the appellant filed FAO No.1647 of 1992 before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
Parmod Bala succumbed to the injuries caused to her due to the accident on the same day.
