Deorao Shankar Lokhande, appellant No.
He married Kamlabai in February 1962, during the lifetime of Indubai.
1 and 3 then garlanded each other.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated August 19, 1963, of the Bombay High Court in Criminal Revision Application No.
Their revision to the High Court also failed.
2, is the brother of the first appellant.
Accused number 1 then sat on the wooden sheet.
On the other sheet accused number 3 sat.
These two appellants, together with Kamlabai and her father and accused No.
It is urged for the appellants that the essential ceremonies for a valid marriage were number performed during the proceedings which took place when appellant No.
388 of 1963.
G. Patwardhan and M. S. Gupta, for the appellants.
S. Barlingay, B. R. G. K. Achar for R. H. Dhebar, for respondent No.
1 with Kamlabai in 1962 had been duly performed in accordance with the religious rites applicable to the form of marriage gone through.
178 of 1963.
5, a barber, were tried for an offence under S. 494 I.P.C. The latter three were acquitted by the Magistrate.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
Appellant No.
Accused number 4 then performed some Puja by bringing a Tambya pitcher.
1 and Kamlabai married each other.
1 was companyvicted under S. 494 I.P.C. and appellant No.
1, was married to the companyplainant Indubai in about 1956.
Betel leaves and companyonut was kept on the Tambya.
A carpet was spread.
2 for an offence under S. 494 read with S. 114 I.P.C. Their appeal to the Sessions Judge was dismissed.
The Judgement of the Court was delivered by Raghubar Dayal, J. Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande, appellant No.
They have preferred this appeal by special leave.
She was sitting nearby accused number 1.
Then they each struck each others forehead.
