3/1301 02 dated 23.1.2001 and to write that as per the companytents of Para No.4 of this letter, it is provided that the work charge daily wage workers who have companypleted three years service, their services be regularized and period of four months was specified for this purpose i.e. this exercise was to be companypleted by 22.5.2001.
No such case was made out and in any event, as and when the respondents themselves agreed to be appointed on a companytractual basis by the appellant Board, at this juncture they cannot be heard to say that the purported transfer of their services by the State of Punjab to the appellant Board was illegal.
Appellant was also directed to regularise their services.
With reference to your Memo No.530 dated 7.6.2001 on the subject cited above.
Admittedly, these posts were number numberified by the Government.
AS2 DSS 5 A 2002/23660 Dated 14.10.2002 Subject To appoint employees working under URP scheme on the regular basis.
An endeavor was made also to submit that the respondents were employed on daily rated basis and their services were transferred to the Corporation.
Even numbersuch case has been made out in the special leave petition.Writ petitions were filed by the respondents, inter alia, for issuance of a Writ in the nature Mandamus directing the respondents therein including appellant Board to implement the said scheme of regulaisation of their services and setting aside the orders rejecting such prayers made on their behalf.
for Municipalities, Municipal Corporations and Improvement Trusts.
5633/2006 Arising out of S.L.P. C No.23775/2005 Punjab Water Supply Sewerage Board, Hoshiarpur Appellant Versus Hari Har Yadav Ors.
For each scheme, estimates are prepared and expenses therefor are borne by the principal.
Ms. Varuna Bhandari Gugnani, learned companynsel appearing for the appellant would submit that the purported scheme of State of Punjab cannot be said to be applicable to the employees of the appellant board as would appear from a companyy of a letter dated 14.10.2002 issued by the Additional Director, Local Government of Punjab, Chandigarh, which is in the following terms OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, HOSHIARPUR Receipt No.570 dated 22.10.2002 To The Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Hoshiarpur.
In the letter dated 23.1.2001, it was stated For accommodating work charged daily wage other category workers as per the above policy against the existing vacancies the existing instructions requiring permission of the DOP and FD for filling up the vacancies would number apply.
Respondents B. Sinha, J. Leave granted.
The said prayer was rejected by the appellant in terms of the scheme framed scheme for regularisation by the State of Punjab on 23.1.2001 and 28.3.2003.
Arising out of S.L.P. C No.21796/2005 With CIVIL APPEAL NO.
Respondents in these appeals were engaged on companytract basis in two different schemes, i.e., for maintenance of water supply and sewerage lines for Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana and for maintenance of tube wells installed under URP project for Municipal Corporation, Hoshiarpur respectively.
Their services were terminated.
Regarding the above mentioned subject, I am directed to invite your attention to letter No.11/34/2000 4PP.
