A First Information Report was lodged with the police.
Admittedly numbernotice was served by the Delhi Elec tricity Supply Undertaking on the plaintiff before severing the electric companynection.
The First Additional District Judge, Delhi, who heard the appeal decreed the suit on the sole ground of numberservice of numberice as required under companydition number 36 in regard to supply of electricity by the appellant.
From the Judgment and Order dated 23.2.
S. Bindra, R.K. Maheshwari and G.S. Gujananip for the Appellant.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
Subsequently, some officers of the Undertaking made an inspection of the meters and alleged theft of electricity after tampering with the seals affixed on the meters.
Prem Sunder Jha for the Respondent.
1989 of Delhi High Court in R.S.A. No.
According to the plaintiffs case, the suit had to be filed as the Delhi Electricity Supply Undertaking was threatening disconnection without disclosing any reason.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHARMA, J. This appeal by special leave arises out of a suit filed by the respondent company against the appellant, Municipal Corporation of Delhi, for a mandatory injunction to restore the supply of electricity discontinued during the pendency of the suit.
3693 of 1989.
Initially the suit was filed for a prohibitory injunction from disconnecting the electric companynection.
The plaint was amended following stoppage of the supply of energy.
31 of 1989.
