Equally, he had also distributed 10 marks experience wise, i.e. for 10 years experience four marks, for 10 15 years experience 6 marks, for 15 20 years experience 6 marks, and for 20 years experience he provided 10 marks.
The rules do number provide the procedure for numberination From the Judgment and Order dated 18 4 1994 of the Punjab Haryana High Court in C.W.P. No.
Baldev Ram had secured 54 marks for ACRS, 8 marks for experience and 9.9 marks for ability test i.e. in total 71.5 marks.
He awarded 10 marks in each subject.
Thereby, Harjinder Singh Sodhi, the second appellant got more marks than the two respondents recommended by the Chief Secretary.
The undisputed facts are that as per the procedure under Punjab Civil Services Executive Branch Class 1 Rules, 1976 to fill up nine vacancies in the Punjab Civil Service Executive Branch, numberinations have been called from various departments.
The appellants have challenged the procedure in the High Court.
10062 of 1993 dated 18 4 1994.
Thus, this appeal by special leave.
With a view to screen the candidates, the Chief Secretary had evolved, by administrative order the procedure, namely, for the ACRs he awarded 70 marks categorising that candidates having Outstanding would get six marks, Very Good four marks, Good two marks, Average one mark, appreciation one mark, adverse remarks one mark minus.
Similar tests were number companyducted in other departments and that, therefore, the procedure adopted by the Chief Secretary was arbitrary, illegal and unjust denying the right to companysideration of the claims of the appellant.
The High Court in the impugned order has upheld the action taken by the Chief Secretary.
head of the department.
For the posts of stenographer and the senior clerks working the Secretariat, the Chief Secretary is the.
It is companytended initially that the marks secured in the ability test alone were taken into companysideration and those candidates who did number secure 33 and below were excluded and those who secured 33 and above were recommended.
This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in WP No.
In addition, he has also companyducted ability test i.e. essay writing in English and Punjabi.
Thereby, he allotted 20 marks.
Since there are more than the required number to be numberinated, namely, while three persons out of the senior stenographers and two persons out of clerical cadre, more than 80 candidates have applied for.
Leave granted.
All put together, he secured 75.5 marks while the recommended candidates, namely, Nanak Singh, Senior Assistant had secured only 56 marks for ACRS, 8 marks for experience and 9.5 marks for ability test in total 73.5 marks.
While determining the ability test candidates who secured more than 33 were recommended and the candidates who secured 33 and less were omitted to be companysidered for recommendation.
10062 of 1993 by the heads of departments, Chief Ministers, Ministers, Chief Justice of High Court etc.
