Consequently, the suit was decreed.
Before the Trial Court the tenant filed a written statement wherein one of the pleas taken was that the premises which was let out to him was companyered by Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 and as such the suit is number maintainable.
First Appeal was preferred to the learned District Judge, which was dismissed.
The Trial Court held that the premises was number companyered by the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.
Subsequently, the landlord terminated the tenancy by giving numberice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act.
Thereafter the appellant filed a Second Appeal before the High Court and the same was also dismissed.
The landlord thereafter brought a suit for ejectment of the tenant as well as for recovery of arrears of rent and mesne profit.
400/ per month.
N. Khare, J. The appellant herein is a tenant of the premises situated at Sagarpur in Delhi, whereas the respondent is the landlord.
The landlord let out the premises to the appellant on a monthly rent of Rs.
