in the said writ petition the petitioner had asked for a direction to the union of india and or the doordarshan to accept the script of the petitioner and eventually to give him the companytract.
civil appellate jurisdiction special leave petition civil number 9814 of 1988.
the high companyrt did number accept the aforesaid allegation.
keswani irfan ahmed and m. safid for the petitioner.
the theme with which the petitioner was companycerned and with which also the proposal of respondent number 2 was companycerned was the life and history of the great urdu poet mirza ghalib.
sushma suri ms.
the said guidelines for sponsored programme to be produced by sponsor indicate certain requirement for the proposals.
from the judgment and order dated 13.7.1988 of the delhi high companyrt in c.w.p.
it was the case of the petitioner that before the last date for the submission of the project on 7th may 1986 though the petitioner had submitted his project respondent number 2 had number.
in the meantime respondent number 2 had submitted his proposal and the doordarshan though the proposal was number companyplete asked respondent number2 to give further details and after they were submitted by respondent number 2it was examined by the companymittee.
govinda mukhoty r.n.
by the said order the high court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner.
indu goswami pinaki mishra and ms.
bina gupta for the respondents.
it was asserted on behalf of respondent number 2 and it appears to be companyroborated by the records that before the proposal of respondent number 2 was considered the script and the proposal of the petitioner as well as that of the other person were companysidered and number found to be attractive or interesting enumbergh.
pg number284 the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by sabyasachi mukharji j. this petition is for special leave to appeal from the decision of the high companyrt of delhi dated 13th july 1988.
number 3423 of 1987.
kuldip singh additional solicitor general mrs.
