142 149 and 225 227 of 1964.
After she actually came out of the Yeravda Central Prison gates and was a free woman, the fresh orders of detention and companymittal dated the 25th September 1963 issued by the Government of Maharashtra were served on her and she was again detained in the Yeravda Central Prison, Yeravda Poona.
180 182, 189, 190, 191, 193 and 194 and 195 to 197 of 1964 respectively.
Criminal Appeal No.
Appeals from the judgment and orders dated April 13,1964 of the Bombay High Court in Criminal Applications Nos.
After she actually came out of the Arthur Road District Prison gates and was a free woman, she was served with a fresh order of detention dated the 3rd February 1964 issued by the Government of Maharashtra under rule 30 of the Defence of India Rules 1962 and redetained with a view to prevent her from acting in a manner prejudicial to the defence of India, the public safety and maintenance of public order.
226 of the Constitution, and s. 491 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JuRISDICTION Criminal Appeal Nos.
The last two orders of cancellation and detention dated the 3rd February 1964 are attached to the said petition as Annexures A and B, respectively.
143 of 1964 has become infructuous because the appellant, S. V. Parulekar, has died.
The appellants appeared in person.
The relevant facts given in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the affidavit filed by the Under Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra are as follows With reference to paragraph 1 of the said Petition I say that the petitioner was detained under order dated the 7th November 1962 issued by the District Magistrate, Thana, under the Preventive Detention Act 1950.
Sikri, J. These appeals by certificate granted by the Bombay High Court are directed against its judgment dated April 13, 1964 in applications filed by the applicants under art.
142/1964 .
Thereafter the petitioner was served with another order of detention dated the 10th November 1962 issued by the Government of Maharashtra under Rule 30 of the Defence of India Rules, 1962.
On 10th November, 1962, the Government of Maharashtra revoked the order of detention dated the 7th November 1962 issued by the District Magistrate, Thana, and the revocation order was served on the petitioner on the 11th November 1962.
A. No.
K. Garg, for appellant in Cr.
Thereafter, by its order dated the 3rd February, 1964, the Government of Maharashtra cancelled its order of detention dated the 25th September 1963 and the petitioner was again released on the 4th February 1964.
S. Bindra and B. R. G. K. Achar, for the respondents.
Further by its order dated the 25th September 1963, the Government of Maharashtra cancelled the said order of detention dated the 10th November 1962 and in pursuance of the said cancellation order the petitioner was released from deten tion on 27th September 1963.
