Appeal by special leave from the Judgment and order dated August 29, 1961, of the Allahabad High Court in Criminal Appeal No.
2 to make bye laws for the running of a purely grain market, and so, his companyclusion was that the relevant bye laws which were alleged to have been companytravened were ultra vires.
The Chairman of respondent No.
The appellant was tried by the Tehsildar of Tanda Cr.
2 initiated criminal proceedings against the appellant.
2 served a numberice on the appellant calling upon him to obtain a licence for running the said market, and on the failure of the appellant to companyply with said numberice, respondent No.
1 of 1962.
CIVIL APELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
September 20, 1963.
The appellant Chaudhari Afzal Ullah is a resident of Tanda and owns a piece of land and superstructures standing on it along with the companypound, in the town of Tanda.
The judgment of the Court was delivered by GAJENDRAGADKAR, J. This appeal by special leave raises a short question about Validity of bye law No.
On his own land, within the companypound, he has established a market in which food grains are sold.
2 then preferred an appeal against the said order of acquittal in the High Court of Allahabad.
B. Agarwala and C. P. Lal, for the respondent No.
C. Misra, for the appellant.
379 of 1961.
3 and other relevant bye laws framed by respondent No.
2, the Municipal Board of Tanda, on the 21st January, 1958.
