P.C. can be granted or number.
293/2010 by acquitting all the accused i.e. respondent number.
P.C. and thereafter it ought to have examined and disposed of the appeal on merits.
The impugned judgment and order of the High Court is challenged in this appeal before this Court questioning its companyrectness.
The companyrectness of the same is questioned by the appellant in this appeal inter alia urging various grounds.
2 to 6 herein.
Being aggrieved of the decision of the trial companyrt, the appellant approached the High Court against the order of acquittal of respondent number.
P.C. The High Court, however, has mechanically disposed of the appeal by passing a cryptic order without examining as to whether the leave to file an appeal filed by the appellant as provided under sub Section 3 to Section 378 of Cr.
P.C. It was further urged by him that the High Court ought to have granted the leave to the appellant to file an appeal by the appellant as required under sub Section 3 of Section 378 of Cr.
Superintendent of Police, Bhind, M.P. The FIR was registered on 27.07.2010.
GOPALA GOWDA, J. Leave granted.
This criminal appeal by special leave is directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 04.03.2014 passed in Criminal Appeal No.547 of 2013 by the High Court of M.P. at Gwalior whereby the High Court has upheld the decision of the Sessions Court, Bhind, M.P. the trial companyrt in Sessions Case No.
Being aggrieved of the impugned judgment and order the appellant being the legal heir of the deceased filed an appeal before the High Court under proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for short the Cr.
The appellant herein made a written companyplaint dated 19.07.2010 regarding the death of his daughter, Ranjana hereinafter referred to as the deceased to the Addl.
The trial companyrt after the examination of evidence on record passed the judgment and order dated 13.06.2013 acquitting all the accused of the charges levelled against them for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 304B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 for short IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and alternatively for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC.
He further requested this Court to remand the matter to the High Court for re appreciation of the evidence on record and pass appropriate order on merits of the case after hearing both the parties.
