The said jeep wasbeing driven by Respondent No.
3 and 4 are parents of one Yogendra Kumar Pathak, who was 19 years of age and on 01.11.2007 while on his way to his village Kor Gaon, he alongwith his sister were travelling in jeep No.
6000/ a month inclusive of salary and over time allowance and was supporting his parents financially.
FIR was lodged at Police Station, Civil Lines, Satna against the driver under Sections 229 and 304 A of the Indian Penal Code.
800/ and amount of Rs.
25000/ was spent on cremation.
1,62,000/ towards the loss of dependency Rs.
3 and 4 preferred miscellaneous appeal No.
3 and 4 herein, against the award dated 28.08.2009 passed by the Second Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Satna, Madhya Pradesh and enhanced the companypensation awarded by the Tribunal.
The factual matrix of the case is that Respondent No.
3000/ per month and deducted 50 therefrom towards personal expenses, as he was a bachelor.
1,72,000/ Rs.
4500/ and number Rs.
1 and met with an accident near Dhal Factory General Road due to rash and negligent driving by the Respondent No.
1which resulted in his death on the spot.
3000/ as determined by the Tribunal, and a multiplier of 16 instead of 9 was supposed to be applied.
3 and 4 have been rendered without any financial support and have been deprived of the association and pleasure of having a family and grand children in future.
Considering the age of the parents which was 56 and 55 years, applied the Multiplier of 9, and awarded a total companypensation of Rs.
MP 19 A 930.
The M.A.C.T., Satna, came to a finding that the deceased was earning Rs.
4867 of 2009 before the High Court for enhancement of amount of companypensation stating that the income of the deceased was Rs.
Being aggrieved, the Respondent No.
His dead body was taken to his village from the hospital on payment of Rs.
After his death, Respondents No.
4500/ per month and in total was getting Rs.
10,000/ towards companyventional heads along with 6 interest per annum from the date of claim petition.
Dr. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, J. Leave granted.
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 15.03.2010 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Miscellaneous Appeal No.
It was stated in the claim petition that before his death, the deceased was a young man of robust health and was working as mechanical fitter in Priya Engineering Prism Cement Factory on the salary of Rs.
The High Court relying on the judgment of this Court in the case of Sarla Verma Smt.
4867 of 2009, whereby the High Court had partially allowed the appeal filed by the Respondent No.
