85 86 OF 2002 These appeals by special leave are directed against the judgment and order dated 13.11.2000 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Madras in respondents R.P Nos.
Aggrieved against the orders passed by the First Appellate Court, the landlord respondent herein preferred two revision petitions before the High Court of Madras wherein a learned Single Judge has reversed the orders passed by the Appellate Authority and maintained the judgment and decree of the Trial Court.
112 at Jawaharlal Nehru Street, Pondicherry on the ground that the premises is very old and in a dilapidated companydition requiring demolition and that he has taken steps to get permission and approval from the companypetent authority for demolition and reconstruction.
1280/1998 and 1281/1998 whereby the learned Single Judge has reversed the order passed by the First Appellate Court and maintained the judgment and decree granted by the Trial Court.
The Trial Court decreed both the suits filed by the landlord respondent and granted decree of eviction against the tenant appellant herein.
He filed another suit on the ground that the tenant appellant had ceased to occupy the demised premises under Section 10 2 vi of the Pondicherry Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act, 1969 hereinafter for short the Act .
The Appellate Authority reversed both the judgments and decrees passed by the Trial Court.
Brief facts which are necessary for the disposal of these appeals are that a suit was filed by the landlord respondent herein for eviction of the tenant appellant herein from the premises bearing Door No.
Aggrieved against both the said judgments and decrees of the Trial Court, the appellant herein preferred two separate appeals before the Appellate Authority.
Hence, the present appeals by special leave have been filed by the tenant appellant.
O R D E R CIVIL APPEAL NOS.
188 Old No.
