But being unsuccessful in getting the recruitment, he approached the High Court challenging, inter alia, that the 3 posts for which advertisement had been issued companyld number have been filled up by direct recruitment and it tantamounts to violation of the relevant statutory rules governing the field.
The learned Single Judge disposed of the writ petition by companying to the companyclusion that numbermaterial had been produced before him to companye to a companyclusion that there has been a violation of the quota rules, while advertising for 3 posts for direct recruitment.
On 20th October, 1981, the Divisional Recruitment Board issued the advertisement for filling up of the aforesaid 3 posts, which are included in Category A of the post under the Fisheries Department, as is apparent from Schedule A to the Fisheries Subordinate Service Recruitment Rules, 1979 hereinafter referred to as the Recruitment Rules .
The dispute relates to the advertisement that was issued for filling up of the posts of Junior Research Assistants and Surveyor.
Asifa Khan was appointed was number a post of Surveyor, and the appropriate authority has erroneously appointed her.
The appellant, who was also in service, and was serving at that point of time as Supervisor in the lower cadre, was also an applicant, pursuance to the advertisement issued.
This appeal is directed by grant of special leave against the judgment of the Division Bench of Jammu and Kashmir High Court at Srinagar in Letter Patent Appeal No.
The Division Bench by the impugned judgment interfered with that direction of the learned Single Judge, and came to hold that there has been numberinfirmity in appointing Smt.
Asifa Khan moved the Division Bench in LPA.
The case of all eligible candidates would be companysidered by the departmental promotion companymittee.
Asifa Khan to the third post, which was one of the posts in the advertisement, and further, present appellant did number possess the requisite qualification.
But he, however, interfered with the appointment of Smt.
It was also companytended that the third post against which Smt.
Asifa Khan, and issued direction for reconsideration of the matter.
Said Smt.
Delay in filing rejoinder affidavit is companydoned.
14/1987.
It is this judgment of the Division Bench which is subject matter of challenge in this appeal.
