from the date of death of buffalo till actual payment is made.
Thus, the burden shift on the opposite party No.2 that the Tag was number sent to the appellant opposite Party No.1 for settling the claim in respect of the buffalo.
The bank, still number satisfied, thought of bringing Smt.
NIA03170.
NIA 03170 to the bank for forwarding the same to the insurance companypany.
As per numbering given by the field officer of the opposite party No.1, the buffalo was lying dead and there was numberTag in the ear of the dead buffalo.
The companyplaint was allowed by the Forum vide its order dated 26.07.2007 with companyt stating as follows We, therefore, allow this companyplaint and direct Opposite Party No.2 to pay the insurance money of the buffalo in question to the companyplainant together with interest at the rate of 9 p.a.
Rejecting the appeal, the appellate forum held as follows Admittedly, the companyplainant had got her buffalo insured with the opposite party number1 with Tag bearing No.
Order of this Forum be companyplied within one month.
Khazani sent a numberice on 30.07.2003 to the bank as well as to the insurance companypany, which yielded numberresults.
Khazani lodged a claim for insurance money through the appellant bank and also supplied ear tag bearing No.
However, the opposite party No.1 insurance companypany has denied having received of any Tag with the claim form submitted by the companyplainant.
surgeon is a companyent proof with respect to the death of buffalo and in the said report the vet.
surgeon had mentioned the Tag number of buffalo as 03170.
Since numbersteps had been taken either by the bank or by the insurance companypany, Smt.
The post mortem was companyducted by veterinary surgeon, Pataudi on 27.12.2001 vide PMR No.50.
The matter did number end there.
Khazani then filed a companyplaint bearing No.825 of 2004 before District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Gurgaon.
Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked by a Gramin Bank on an issue on which numberquestion of law arises for companysideration.
Opposite Party No.2 is also burdened to pay Rs.3,000/ to the companyplainant on account of companyt of litigation and companypensation for the harassment caused by Opposite Party No.2 to the companyplainant.
Luckily, they got numberice on the Special Leave Petition and Smt.
The post mortem report Annexure C 2 which was companyducted by the vet.
NIA/03170 with the New India Assurance Company Ltd. second respondent herein.
Facts are as follows Smt.
The bank again moved the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi against the order dated 21.07.2009 passed by the State Commission, Haryana by filing a Revision Petition No.
The bank, dissatisfied with the order by the District Forum, filed Appeal No.2404/2007 before State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, Panchkula.
The buffalo unfortunately died on 27.12.2001.
