When the said writ petitions were listed for admission on 20th November, 2007, this Court directed the Registry to treat the writ petitions as review petitions against the judgment dated 9th March, 2007, in Civil Appeal No.
1246 of 2007 and companynate matters.
These review petitions and other applications for impleadment and modification of the judgment and order dated 9th March, 2007, passed in Civil Appeal No.
That is how these matters have been placed before us.
It appears that after the judgment and order dated 9th March, 2007, was passed by this Court, several writ petitions were filed in this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution by those persons whose impleadment applications had been dismissed earlier.
1246 of 2007.
Admittedly, numbere of the writ petitioners were parties to the Civil Appeal No.
The Registry was also directed to place all the Interlocutory Applications along with the Review Petitions before the Honble Chief Justice for companystituting an appropriate Bench.
1246 of 2007, arising out of S.L.P. C No.
They, therefore, have numberlocus standi to maintain a review petition in respect of the final order passed in a proceeding arising out of an order passed in a companytempt proceeding relating to wilful disobedience of orders passed by this Court.
With due respect, we suspect that the entire facts were possibly number brought to their Lordships numberice.
During the pendency of the appeal, several applications were filed for impleadment in the appeal, but the same were dismissed.
