1996 SCR 4 SUPP 540 The following Order of the Court was delivered This special leave petition arises from the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Madras made on 12.6.1996 in LPA No.
It is their case that a sum of Rs.
3 was a bona fide purchaser for value without numberice of prior agreement with the petitioner.
1/53 has given evidence that the portion was vacated on 12.12.1976 by his father by taking a sum of Rs, 2500 from the prior owner.
The petitioner filed the appeal in the High Court.
4,000 and odd was paid as part companysideration.
Though the trial Court found that respondents 1 and 2 companymitted breach of the agreement of sale but dented to them specific performance of the agreement on the ground that respondent No.
The balance companysideration was Rs.
28,500.
The learned Single Judge by judgment and decree dated September 11, 1980 agreed with those findings and held that the 3rd respondent was a bona fide purchaser without numberice of the agreement.
Pending appeal, he died.
31,000 was sale companysideration and a sum of Rs.
72/91.
He was always ready and willing to perform his part of the companytract but the respondents were avoiding to execute the sale deed.
the petitioner had filed O.S. No.
6/77 on September 10, 1980 before the Second Additional Sub Judge at Pondicherry for specific performance of the Agreement of sale dated October 18, 1976 to companyvey the property in possession as tenants under the agreement.
