The fact that at the time of his death, the deceased was discharging his duties is number disputed.
Indisputably, the incident had occurred while deceased was performing his duties.
The autopsy was companyducted wherein the cause of death was opined as Cardiac arrest due to Rupture Aortic Aneurysm.
Appellant herein, the mother of deceased filed a Claim Petition under the Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 for short, the Act before the Commissioner for Workmens Compensation which was registered as WCA SR/19/2003.
It was alleged My son died while working in the vehicle of R 1 and due to the strain of work A companyy of the Claim Petition has number been placed before us.
The said vehicle belonged to Respondent No.
He suddenly developed chest pain.
He was admitted to Government hospital, Mangaon where the doctor declared him dead.
19222 of 2005 B. Sinha, J. Leave granted.
The only evidence which was brought on record was by way of deposition of Appellant.
The vehicle being insured with the United India Insurance Company, it was also impleaded as a party.
Arising out of SLP C No.
He was travelling in the said vehicle in the night of 27.9.2002.
Prakash Chandrakant Shreshti hereinafter called the deceased was working as a Cleaner in Vehicle No.
MH 09A 9727.
