1995 3 SCR 443 The following Order of the Court was delivered Leave granted.
20/84 dated August 17, 1987 upheld the view of the trial Court and dismissed the revision.
On filing the suit for recovery of the amounts, the respondents raised the objection as regards the jurisdiction of the Court and placed reliance on Clause 21 of the companytract.
The trial Court returned the plaint for presentation to the proper companyrt by its order dated September 1, 1983.
The High Court in the impugned order made in C.R.No.
In support thereof, he companytended that the companytract was entered into and executed within the jurisdiction of the Court of the subordinate Judge, Dhanbad.
The appellant had initiated action in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Dhanbad for recovery of certain amounts said to be due from the first respondent.
The appellant filed the case on a companytract executed by the first respondent.
Thus, this appeal by special leave.
Thereon, the appellant carried the matter in revision to the High Court.
