By award dated 31.07.1995 AnnexureP2 , the Industrial Tribunal, Kota answered the reference on merits in respondents favour.
DEMANDS The difference between the amount which has been declared by the Government and the actual amount which has been paid by the Management, which has number been paid so far, be treated as deferred wages and paid to the workmen in the form of exgratia payment and this difference should be more than 20 of the salaries being received by the workmen All workmen should be given 15 days casual leaves in a year.
On 26.07.1989, the State Government made a reference under Section 10 1 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Industrial Tribunal, Kota for deciding the following disputes which read as under Whether the demands raised in the demand letters by the Secretary, Zila Petrol Pump Mazdoor Sangh before the Manager, Maheshwari Automobiles Corporation, District Bundi, are just and valid?
By order dated 10.09.1997, the Single Judge allowed the writ petition and set aside the award.
A few facts need mention hereinbelow in brief to appreciate the companytroversy involved in these appeals.
Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant filed the review petition, which was dismissed by the Division Bench of the High Court.The impugned order was passed in appellants absence because numbere appeared for the appellant respondent in appeal before the Division Bench when the appeal was heard.
The appellant, on companying to know of the passing of the award, filed the writ petition in the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur W.P. No.
5294/1996.
It is, however, number in dispute that the Industrial Tribunal decided the reference ex parte against the appellant.
11 holidays be given every year for National Holidays and other festivals.
In Para 4 of the award, the Tribunal numbered that the appellant respondent therein did number appear despite numberice served on them and hence they are proceeded ex parte.
By impugned order, the Division Bench allowed the respondents appeal and set aside the order of the Single Judge.
If yes, to what reliefs the workmen are entitled to?
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 21.11.2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench, Jaipur in D.B. Civil Special Appeal No.449 of 1999 whereby the Division Bench of the Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA Date 2019.02.12 High Court allowed the appeal filed by the 171411 IST Reason respondent herein and the order dated 10.04.2007 whereby the review petition filed by the appellant herein was dismissed.
The respondent, therefore, felt aggrieved and filed writ appeal No.449/1999 before the Division Bench of the High Court.
