yard as companypensation.
12,100/ per acre for garden land and Rs.
yard while the State companytended that the rate of Rs.
1621 of 1970 have been preferred by original claimants.
520/ per acre for Kharab land.
6/ per sq.
These four appeals arise as cross appeals two by the State of Karnataka and two by the original landholders against the award of Rs.
12/ per sq.
123 of 1971 and 1787 of 1970 have been filed by the State of Karnataka, while Civil Appeal No.
yard is much on the higher side and it must be reduced.
In reference to the Civil Judge, under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act the price was determined at the rate of Rs.
20/ per sq.
Roughly Rs.
May be one or two reasons from those that appealed to High Court may number have appealed to us.
123 of 1971 and the appellant in Civil Appeal No.
12/ per sq.
12/ per sq.
In Civil Appeal No.
12/ per sq.
Undoubtedly Ext.
Ultimately, the matter went up to the High Court by two appeals one filed by Abdul Basith, respondent in Civil Appeal No.
404 of 1971, and the other by Haji S. Mohamed Ismail, number deceased appellant in Civil Appeal No.
2.50 per sq.
On the other hand claimants in two appeals companytended that in view of the sale entries Exs.
Claimants companytended that they should be awarded companypensation at the rate of Rs.
The High Court determined market price of land on the relevant date at the rate of Rs.
Haji S. Mohamed Ismail died and his legal representatives have been substituted.
yard .
yard and directed to award companypensation accordingly.
123 of 1971 Mr. B.R.L. Iyengar made a specific grievance that even though there was a finding of the learned Civil Judge in Reference under Section 18 that the land was marshy, that it was by the side of a Halla Drainage Channel, that the only access to it was by a foot bridge and that these companysiderations had weighed with the Civil Judge in determining the rate of companypensation, these vital and relevant companysiderations were wholly overlooked by the High Court while awarding companypensation at the rate of Rs.
Civil Appeals Nos.
1787 of 1970.
Hence these appeals under unamended Article 133 1 a and b by certificate.
1621 of 1970 and respondent in Civil Appeal No.
P 2 and Ext.
20,500/ per acre which roughly works out at Rs.
yard being in par with other claimants.
123 of 1971 and Civil Appeal No.
The Land Acquisition Officer determined market price at the rate of Rs.
A. Desai, J. All these four appeals arise out of an acquisition of land by a numberification dated August 21, 1958 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act The market price as on the date of numberification had to be determined for assessment and payment of companypensation.
20/ per sq.
P 2 of 1956 and P 21 of February, 1958 the Court should have awarded Rs.
