5 SCR 584 The following Order of the Court was delivered Leave granted Notification under section 4 1 of the Land Acquisition Act 1 of 1894, for short the Act, acquiring 80 bighas 18 biswas of land situated in revenue estate, Bhatinda, Tehsil and Distt.
In LPA No.
The Land Acquisition Collector had redetermined the market value under section 28 A 2 by his award dated February 28, 1989 but did number award solatium and interest and the additional companypensation under section 23 1 A of the Act.
the Collector made an award under section 11 on June II, 1975 determining the market value, based on the classification of the land, between Rs, 4,500 to Rs.
The respondents made a written application under section 28 A on November 24, 1987.
On appeal, the High Court had modified the award Ultimately on appeal, this Court determined the market value at Rs.
The award was made in another reference on March 15, 1990 and within three months thereafter, the respondents are entitled to file an application under section 28 A. Therefore, the application filed on November 24, 1987 companyld be treated to be one filed pursuant to that award.
Judge by his award dated July 13, 1979 determined the companypensation enhancing the market value to Rs.
The respondents had accepted the companypensation without protest and did number seek any reference under section 18.
17 per sq.
Some other claimants sought and secured reference under section 18 of the Act.
15 to Rs.
Bhatinda alongwith other lands was published on October 9, 1974.
20,000 per acre.
by judgment dated August 24, 1987.
The respondents made another application C.M. No 4978/90 enclosing another award dated March 15, 1990 made by the Distt, Court in yet another reference and sought the statutory benefits, Since it was denied, in the respondents writ petition, a learned Single Judge, by his order dated December 21, 1990, allowed the W.P. and directed the award of the additional benefits.
Thus this appeal by special leave.
1994 SUPPL.
The Addl.
Distt.
16,000 per acre.
5,625 to Rs.
1211/92 filed by the appellants by judgment and order dated December 21, 1992, the Division Bench dismissed the appeal.
