2220 L A of 1996 filed by Tika Ram Anr.,
This question in the precise form, was number raised before the High Court.
The High Court has granted certificate granting leave to file appeal.
The Writ Petitioners companytended that some being industries were manufacturing certain articles and their running business had companye to the standstill because of the land acquisition activities.
They have also prayed for a disciplinary action against the Station Officer, Police Station Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, U.P. These are the three sets of Writ Petitions, which came to be disposed of by the High Court by a companymon judgment.
In these cases, the possession was taken by Lucknow Development Authority hereinafter referred to as LDA for short , so also the award was passed on 25.2.1987.
4 and 5.
In one set of Writ Petitions, it was found that numberifications were issued under Section 4 and sub Section 4 of Section 17 of the Act, simultaneously with the declaration under Section 6 of the Act.
Since the source, authentication and verification of those documents was number clear, these documents were number liable to be companysidered.
In another set of Writ Petitions, wherein the leading Writ Petition was P. No.
the numberification was issued under Section 4 1 and 17 and declaration under Section 6 of the Act simultaneously.
Heavy reliance was placed on the documents which were filed alongwith I.A. Nos.
These Writ Petitions were filed companyering various subjects.
In one of the Writ Petitions, bearing No.
All these companytentions raised were opposed by Shri Rakesh Kumar Dwivedi, Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the LDA, Shri Dinesh Dwivedi, Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of State of Uttar Pradesh, as also other Learned Counsel like Shri Manoj Swarup, Shri Anil Kumar Sangal, Shri C.D. Singh and Shri Arvind Varma etc.,
16 L A of 1996 filed by one Ram Bharosey, award dated 25.2.1987 which was validated in pursuance of Section 2 of the Validating Act, was in challenge.
In still another set of Writ Petitions, Pratap Housing Cooperative Society and some industries prayed for exempting their land from the land acquisition proceedings.
In these Writ Petitions, the Writ Petitioners had companytended that they had purchased their land from tenure holders for Cooperative Societies for providing land to their members and companystruction of the houses.
All these appeals and the Special Leave Petition challenge a companymon judgment passed by Allahabad High Court, disposing of several Writ Petitions.
These documents were number the part of the High Court record.
4 and 5, numbernotice has been issued by this Court.
who addressed us extensively, supporting the order.
S. SIRPURKAR, J. Background of Appeals This judgment will dispose of Civil Appeal Nos.
2650 2652 of 1998, 3162 of 1998, 3176 of 1998, 3415 of 1998, 3561 of 1998, 3597 of 1998, 3923 of 1998, 3939 of 1998, 3645 of 1998, 3691 of 1998, 5346 of 1998, 2116 2118 of 1999, 2139 of 1999, 2121 of 1999, 2113 of 1999, 4995 4996 of 1998 and SLP C No CC 1540 of 1999.
