It appears that there were differences of opinion between the parties and according to the appellanthusband, cruelty was meted out to him.
That the learned Family Court dismissed the said divorce petition by observing and holding that the appellanthusband has failed to prove the cruelty by the respondentwife.
157 of 1999 dismissing the divorce petition, the appellanthusband preferred an appeal before the High Court.
That the marriage of the appellant and the respondent took place on 09.05.1993.
Before the High Court also, the appellanthusband sought a decree of divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage.
The appellanthusband filed a divorce petition in the year 1999 being O.P. No.
By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has dismissed the said appeal.
157 of 1999 before the Family Court at Hyderabad.
2.1 Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order passed by the Family Court at Hyderabad dated 04.09.2003 in O.P. No.
That the said petition was filed for a decree of divorce against the respondentwife under Section 13 1 ia and ib of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Up to 1997, many a times, the respondentwife stayed at her parental house.
R. SHAH, J. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 06.02.2012 passed in C.M.A. No.
4142 of 2003 by the High Court of Judicature Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad, by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the appellanthusband and has companyfirmed the judgment and order passed by the learned Family Court refusing to pass a decree of divorce against the respondentwife, the appellanthusband has preferred the present appeal.
That out of the said wedlock, the respondent gave birth to a male child on 29.08.1995.
The Family Court also refused to pass a decree of divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage.
