575 of 1992 whereby the respondent was required to render accounts in respect of the property referred to in document marked as Exhibit 249.
The Court held that obviously all these properties were trust properties and it was obligatory on the Registrar to publish the said list of properties.
1 was number under obligation to render account as a receiver.
498 of 1964.
Against the said judgment Review Petition No.
16 of 1987 decided on 1st February, 1992.
Emphasis added Thereafter, by order dated 2nd April, 1993, third Additional District Judge, Nagpur directed respondent No.
The Additional District Judge set aside the judgment and decree dated 27th March, 1967 and arrived at the companyclusion that the Trust companyprised in the deed of settlement dated 9th June, 1894 is a public trust.
As the entry was registered, Respondent filed Contempt Petition No.
Against that judgment and decree, Second Appeal No.
By judgment and order dated 7th October, 1996, the said appeal was dismissed and decree, SLP C No.
By the impugned order, the Court allowed the Revision Application and set aside the order dated 2 4 93 passed by the Additional District Judge, Nagpur in Miscellaneous Civil Application No.
497 of 1993 by the Nagpur Bench of High Court of Bombay.
1 Amiruddin s o Hasan Noorani to render the account of all the properties including the properties companyered by Exhibit 249 within a period of one month from the date of the order.
25004 of 1996 was filed before this Court which was dismissed by order dated 13th January, 1997.
1 was appointed as Receiver.
The Trial Court dismissed the suit on the ground that plaintiff had numberlocus standi.
The Court further directed as under Since the litigation in respect of the said property is pending in the District Court, it is essential that during its pendency the properties which are stated to belong to the public trust should number be frittered away.
498 of 1964 before this Court wherein it was companytended that Deputy Charity Commissioner has flouted the directions issued by this Court by Order dated 22nd August, 1966 in Civil Appeal No.
178 of 1990 in Civil Appeal No.
An appeal being Regular Civil Appeal No.
Admittedly, the case has a chequered history.
Hence the present appeal by special leave.
143 of 1967 was filed on 26th September, 1967 as provided under Section 8 of the Act for setting aside the findings that the trust was number a public trust.
In the meantime, the Deputy Charity Commissioner had taken in his register the list of properties of the public trust as per Exhibit 249, the relinquishment deed as public trust properties.
16 of 1987 was allowed by the Additional District Judge, Nagpur and it was held that the Trust was a public trust.
132 of 1992 was filed before the High Court.
497 of 1993 was filed before the High Court.
By Order dated 12.2.91, the Court rejected the said companytempt application but for protecting the properties Shri Amiruddin Hassan Noorani Malak respondent No.
Against that judgment and decree, Second Appeal No.
In our view, the impugned order passed by the learned Judge appears on the face of it companytrary to the directions issued by this Court on 12th February, 1991 in Contempt Petition No.
That application was rejected.
Finally, a special civil suit No.
Shah, J. This appeal is filed against the judgment and order dated December 19, 1994 passed in Civil Revision Application No.
