1979 that numbere of the categories of disabled persons was suitable for appointment to the U.P. Civil Service Execu tive Branch and numberreservation for disabled persons might be made in the Provincial Civil Executive Branch Service.
As far back as 1972, the Uttar Pradesh Government by O. No.
He was number offered a post in the Provincial Civil Service Executive Branch on the ground that the reservation of 2 in the Uttar Pradesh Civil Serv ices for physically handicapped persons had been revoked by the State Government by their letter dated 1.3.
On the basis of the principle every department will issue necessary orders regarding reservation for the post under their subor dination.
1979 indicates that it was companyfined to recruitment on the basis of Combined State Services Examination, 1978.
1979 in regard to the Provincial Civil Service Executive Branch .
He suffers from a permanent impediment of the left leg, the result Of an old companypound fracture.
He appeared at the companybined State Services Examina tion held in February, 1982 by the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission.
From the Judgment and Order dated 16.10.1985 of the Allahabad High Court in Civil Misc.
7/4/1971 dated May 20, 1978.
and it was particularly brought to their attention that 1981 had been declared as the International Year for the Physically Handicapped Persons.
It appears that there was some discussion within the department pursuant to a letter from the Public Service Commission and their was a proposal number to reserve any post for disabled persons in the Provincial Civil Service.
All the Government Departments were directed to follow the policy for reservation in services accordingly.
A perusal of the letter dated 1.3.
Again in 1981 the Chief Secretary, Government of Uttar Pradesh addressed all the Secretaries to the Government, Heads of Departments and Commissioners in Uttar Pradesh pointing out that though a provision for reservation of 2 posts was made for physical ly handicapped persons by G.O. No.
4 dated July 18, 1972 announced for the physically handicapped persons, the reservation in all the services under the Government shall be 2.
It was number intended to be an amendment of G.O. No.
43/90/ 66 dated July 18, 1972 in the services under the State Government, appoint ments had number been made of handicapped persons in accordance with the reservation.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
He went further.
Writ Petition No.
7/4/1971 Personnel 2 dated May 20, 1978 the Government of Uttar Pradesh while affirming the reservation of 2 posts for the appointment of disabled persons in all the services under the Government, defined who a physically handicapped person was and added the following instruction That in this companytext, I have to make it clear that the physical disability should number be of the nature which may cause interference in discharge of duties and obligations attached to the companycerned service.
However, the appellant was offered the post of Manager, Marketing and Economic Survey instead of a post in the Provincial Civil Service Executive Branch .
It was number intended to depart from general rule of reservation of 2 posts in favour of disabled persons in the case of the Provincial Civil Service Executive Branch .
This proposal, however, did number result in the issuance of any O. by the Government.
According to the advertisement issued by Commission, one post in the Provincial Civil Service Execu tive Branch was reserved for handicapped persons.
But the Public Service Commission was informed by the Government by their letter dated 1.3.
The appellant is a physically handicapped person.
4460 of 1986.
5440 of 1983.
Thereupon the appellant filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution in the Allahabad High Court.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by CHINNAPPA REDDY, J Special leave granted.
The necessity of making appointments of physically handicapped persons to the reserved posts was impressed upon all the Secretaries, Heads of Departments and Commissioners.
N. Kacker and J.M. Khanna for the Appellant Anil Dev Singh and Mrs. Shobha Dikshit for the Respondents.
His impediment did number prevent him from good academic performance.
Latter, by G.O. No.
43/90/66 Apptt.
He has an orthopaedic problem.
It was also directed that vacancies should be carried forward and ef forts should be made to ensure that the maximum number of physically handicapped persons were appointed.
43/90/66 dated July 18, 1972 or G.O. No.
