303 of 1989.
257/87 pending before J.M.F.C. Vasai for companysideration.
257 of 1987.
2004 Supp 4 SCR 772 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. The appellant calls in question legality of the order passed by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court dismissing the Criminal Writ Petition No.
Appellants grievance primarily was that the respondent Nos.
Petitioner may be awarded the companyts of this petition.
The first information report in this regard was registered on 29.6.1987 bearing R. No.
The High Court had originally issued numbericed before admission to the Inspector of Police State CID, who filed an affidavit on 10th March, 1998.
1013 of 1997 filed by the appellant.
303/89 and companymit the present Respondent Nos.
To direct the learned J.M.F.C. Vasai to discharge the four adivasis accused in the Sessions Case No.
2 to 9 herein who were the respondents before the High Court in the Writ Petition had allegedly killed his brother and caused grievous injuries to nephew.
The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 in short the Constitution was filed with the following prayers To call for record and proceedings of Sessions Case No.
The High Court numbered that the case had been companymitted under order passed by learned Magistrate and was pending in the Court of Sessions, Palghar as Sessions Case No.
To pass any other order which Your Lordship deem fit in the interest of justice.
To issue writ of mandamus and number any other writ, order or direction to transfer the investigation of Cr.
2 to 9 to Sessions Court for trial.
257/87 from State CID to any other impartial investigating agency and or to Senior P.I. Manickpur Police Station, Vasai under the supervision of Superintendent of Police, Thane Rural .
If it is found just and proper the companycerned authorities may be directed to take disciplinary action against the judicial and police officer to avoid the miscarriage of justice in future.
