The private respondents moved the High Court under Article 226N of the Constitution alleging that the posts of Engineering Supervisor and Assistant Engineer under the Board are required to be filled up by promotion from among the Junior Engineers.
Since admittedly, numberrules have been framed, the appointments to the post of Assistant Engineer made by the Trust are invalid and accordingly such appointments were quashed.
It was also alleged that the Trust had issued an advertisement in the year 1981 inviting applications for the post of Assistant Engineer laying down Degree in Civil Engineering with three years experience as the eligibility criteria.
This eligibility clause was later on dispensed with by subsequent advertisement dated 1st of August 1982 and people companyld be appointed with sufficient experience.
1945 of 1989.
By the said judgment under challenge, the High Court has quashed the promotion of the private respondents to the post of Assistant Engineer Civil , inter alia, on the ground that there has been numberrules framed by the State Government to promote people in the technical line and in the absence of such rule, it is number possible for the Trust Board to appoint people either on the basis of any decision of the Board or under any executive instructions evolved by the Board.
781 of 1988 and Writ Petition No.
PATTANAIK, J. These appeals by the Nagpur Improvement Trust are directed against the judgment of the Division Bench, Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No.
