The companytention put forth before the Industrial Tribunal is that the disciplinary action taken against the original appellant is based upon the allegation of distribution of Pamphlet which he did as an office bearer of the Trade Union.
1 made was found fully proved against the original appellant in those circumstances the Industrial Tribunal granted approval to the action of the employer respondent in dismissing the original appellant workman.
Such approval was granted by the tribunal on 26 7 1993, which was challenged in a proceeding arising under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court.
Learned single Judge who dealt with the writ petition quashed the order made by the Industrial Tribunal.
On further appeal to the Division Bench, the High Court set aside the order made by the learned single Judge and restored that of the Industrial Tribunal.
The legal representatives are allowed to companye on record.
That aspect was examined by the Tribunal.
Hence this appeal by special leave.
During the pendency of these proceedings, it is brought to our numberice, that the appellant had died.
