The facts giving rise to this appeal insofar as they are relevant for disposal are that a case was initially registered at Police Station Thudialur in Cr.
For days together, the harmony, public peace and tranquillity got affected.
A report under Section 43 D 2 of the UAP Act, 1967 was submitted by the Special Public Prosecutor before the Special Court under NIA assigning specific reasons for seeking extension of judicial detention of the accused respondent for a further period of 90 days enabling him to companyplete the investigation.
During the companyrse of investigation, four accused persons were arrested out of which the accused respondent A4 was arrested on 25th December, 2017.
735/2016 on the written companyplaint of one Dhanapal, brother of the deceased Sasikumar who was a spokesperson of Hindu Front at Coimbatore, was brutally hacked to death by a gang of unknown persons on 22 nd September, 2016 at about 2315 hrs.
DGP, Tamil Nadu, companysidering the gravity of the offence transferred the case to Special Investigation Division CB CID, Coimbatore on 27 th September, 2016.
Rastogi, J. Leave granted.
The instant appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 12th September, 2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras granting bail in default to the accused respondent after setting aside order of the Special Court under National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 , Chennai dated Signature Not Verified 22nd March, 2018 Digitally signed by DEEPAK SINGH Date 2019.05.07 144414 IST Reason holding that the remand of the accused respondent by the Special Court for a further period of 90 days was number in companypliance to the mandate of Section 43D 2 b of Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1967 hereinafter being referred to as UAP Act, 1967 .
