3 and 4 were entitled to the benefit arising out of the provisions of Section 21 1 h read with Section 157 was decided against the appellants and the High Court rightly refused to re examine the companytroversy which was set at rest by findings of fact.
The appellants denied the allegations and prayed for dismissal of the objection.
According to the case of the respondents they were the tenants and the appellants were subtenants under them when the zamindari was abolished in Uttar Pradesh.
As the respondent No.
In view of the subsequent amendment in the law the respondents claimed the rights of bhumidhars.
The Assistant Settlement Officer, Consolidation agreed with the respondents and allowed the objection.
The Consolidation Officer rejected the objection and the respondents filed an appeal.
3, Ram Narain, was a paralytic patient and respondent No.
An appeal under Chapter VIII, Rule 5 of the High Court Rules was also dismissed by a Division Bench by the judgment which is the subject matter of the present civil appeal by special leave.
The appellants after unsuccessfully moving the Deputy Director of Consolidation in revision filed a writ petition in the High Court, which was dismissed by a learned Single Judge.
On that basis it is claimed that the appellants who were their sub tenants acquired the status of asamis and number that of adhivasis.
An attempt was made by the learned Counsel for the appellants before us to re open the issue but we declined to go into that question which is dependent on evidence.
4, Sheo Narain, a minor, whose father was suffering from a disqualification within the meaning of Clause d of Section 157 1 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, hereinafter referred to as the Act , they were companyered by Section 157 and companysequently the provision of Section 21 1 h were attracted.
Lalit Mohan Sharma, J. The respondents No.
3 and 4 filed on objection under Section 9 A of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, companytending that the names of the appellants were wrongly recorded in place of their names as sirdars with respect to the land in question.
