It is number known how despite the total exclusion of private operators from plying any Stage Carriage on the whole or any sector of the route, Lucknow Kanpur, the extension of the route Unnao to Kanpur was granted to these two persons.
27 of 1976 .
They preferred an appeal CA Nos.
So also Writ petition Nos.
2 of 1951 were revalidated with effect from June 18, 1951.
Unnao is a station between 1 Lucknow and Kanpur.
Aggrieved by the order of the Regional Transport Authority granting the extension, the U.P State Road Transport Corporation filed a revision before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal.
The appeals, CA Nos.
The State Transport Appellate Tribunal set aside the order of the Regional Transport Authority on April 18, 1973.
756 of 1983, the original permit which the petitioner held over the route Varanasi Dhanapur expired on February 4,1974 and was number renewed.
1139 41 of 1980, we quantify the companyts awarded to the respondents at Rs.
A writ petition filed by the two operators was dismissed by the Allahabad High Court on February 27, 1978, The operators had earlier obtained a stay of the operation of the order of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal and were companytinuing to ply their vehicles on the sector Unnao Kanpur also.
In Writ petition No.
In Writ petition No.
1139 41 of 1980 and once more obtained stay without disclosing the filing of the earlier writ petition No.
9 of 1955, by Sections 19 and 20 of which the Notifications issued under the Uttar Pradesh Act No.
1139 41 of 1980 had earlier filed writ petition No.
2 of 1951 and the Notification were struck down by this Court in Saghir Ahmed v. State of Uttar Pradesh .
304/1979.
Thereafter the two petitioners moved the companypetent authority under Section 5 of the U.P. Motor Vehicles Special Provisions Act, 1976 and on November 17, 1978 their applications were rejected by the companypetent authority.
In Writ petition Nos.
76 and 77 of 1979 held permits to ply State Carriages between Hardoi and Unnao.
133 136/79, 304/79, 1139 41 of 1980 also stand companycluded by what we have said above.
Hindustan Transport Company and Smt.
In the meanwhile this Court, in Mysore Road Transport Corporation v. Mysore State Appellate Tribunal decided that when there was a total exclusion of private operators in nationalisation scheme, it was number permissible to allow operators to ply their vehicles even on sectors of the numberified route on companydition of observing Corridor Restrictions.
In 1972, the petitioners obtained an extension of their permits enabling them to run their State Carriages on the route Hardoi Unnao Kanpur, subject to what are known as Corridor Restrictions, that is, that the vehicles would number pick up or set down any passengers between Unnao and Kanpur, which was a sector of the nationalised route, Lucknow Kanpur.
1139 41 of 1980 we propose to award heavy companyts as the very petitioners in writ petition Nos.
But in Writ petition No.
But the Uttar Pradesh Act No.
304 of 1979 and the circumstance that the stay had been vacated therein.
304 of 1979, they filed writ petition Nos.
27 of 1976.
1411 12 of 1978 to this Court and obtained a similar stay.
Chunni Devi the petitioners in writ petition Nos.
Later he was granted a fresh permit over the number notified route Chandauli to Dhanapur.As it was thought that a too stringent application of the principle of the decision was likely to cause hardship in some cases, the Uttar Pradesh Legislature passed the U.P. Motor Vehicles Special Provisions Act, 1976 U.P. Act No.
When stay was vacated in writ petition No.
1411 12 of 1978 were disposed of by this Court on September 11, 1978.
2000/ in each petition.
27 of 1976, it was number necessary to go into the effect of nationalisation of portion of a route as the affected operators companyld well seek relief under Section 5 of the U.P. Act No.
They are also dismissed with companyts.
5230 34 of 1983 and 855 of 1983, which too are dismissed with companyts.
It was thought that in view of U.P. Act No.
However, the Uttar Pradesh Legislature enacted Uttar Pradesh Act No.
