70 of 1970 in the Court of learned Subordinate Judge, Tanuku for partition of B and C Schedule properties, inter alia, companytending that she had inherited the share in the said B and C Schedule properties through Karunamma who was the daughter of Mark, the admitted owner of the property.
This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 6 11 1985 passed by the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Letters Patent Appeal No.
It was inter alia companytended by the said companytesting defendants that the Will executed by Karunamma was number a valid one.
The companytesting Defendants 2 to 7 who are appellants before this Court, filed a written statement, inter alia, disputing the claim of the plaintiff.
The Single Bench of the High Court allowed the said appeal inter alia on the finding that the Will set up by the first respondent is valid.
It was also held that the appellants, namely, Defendants 2 to 7 did number acquire title to the suit property by adverse possession.
The trial companyrt did number accept the validity of the Will but decreed the suit in part by accepting the title of the plaintiff in respect of C Schedule property, namely, the house property.
The said Respondent 1 also claimed title to the said property under a Will executed by her mother Karunamma.
In any event, the plaintiff lost her title to the said property because of adverse possession exercised by Defendants 2 to 7.
Defendants 2 to 7 in the partition suit OS No.
Thereafter, Defendants 2 to 7 preferred LPA No.
Respondent 1 filed the said OS No.
Substitution is allowed if number allowed by previous order.
564 of 1975 against the said judgment of the learned Subordinate Judge.
The plaintiff thereafter preferred an appeal being AS No.
70 of 1979.
70 of 1970 are the appellants before us.
