The admitted facts are that the suit properties of various Khasra number, admeasuring 12.4 bighas and 22.4 bighas situated in Mohal Kanyarka Pargana Churah Tehsil Bhattiyat District Chamba in the State of Himachal Pradesh, belonged to the respondent.
She had filed a suit for possession against the appellant pleading that the he is a licensee and had agreed to cultivate the lands or her behalf as licensee and, therefore, he is liable to be ejected by a decree of eviction in the suit.
The trial Court had decreed the suit and appellate companyrt allowed the appeal and dismissed the suit.
In the second appeal, the High Court reversed the judgment and decree of the appellate Court and companyfirmed that of trial Court.
This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the learned Single Judge of the Himachal Pradesh High Court, dated June 16, 1980 in RSA No.
It is the case of the appellant that though the parties are related, he is only a tenant giving the produce to the respondent landlady for her as he was looking after her.
Thus, this appeal.
