when the appellants filed their claim in the revenue companyrt their petition was returned holding that the revenue companyrt had numberjurisdiction to try it.
appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated 15th january 1969 of the punjab and haryana high court in s.a.
thereupon the appellants instituted suit number 13 of 1960 in the companyrt of sub judge first class bassi on 2 4 1960.
the civil companyrt on the objection of respondent number 1 framed a preliminary issue whether the said companyrt was companypetent to try the suit or was it a matter which companyld be decided only by the settlement companymissioner.
this suit has failed throughout on the ground of res judicata.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 2021 of 1969.
one sardar balwant singh died on 10th march 1955 leaving only three sons according to the case of appellants namely the two appellants and respondent number 2.
k. garg for the appellants.
number 905 of 1963.
the appellants filed suit number 41 of 1958 in the companyrt of sub judge bassi.
s. bindra and t. s. arora for respondent number 2.
hardev singh for respondent number 1.
by order dated 7.7.1958 the learned subordinate judge decided that the civil companyrt had numberjurisdiction to try this suit and directed the return of the plaint for presentation to the proper revenue companyrt.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by untwalja j. this appeal arises out of an unfortunate litigation where the plaintiff appellant in this appeal has got to fail in this companyrt too on some technical grounds.
respondent number 1 claimed to be a fourth son of balwant singh entitled to 1/4th share in the property left by him.
