Stand taken before the learned Sessions Judge was that by the time the protest petition was filed the informant had died and false affidavit with a thumb impression was filed.
Since the informant had already died, the learned Magistrate companyld number have been proceeded in the matter.
294 /2008 Arising out of SLP Crl.
The revision was filed questioning the legality of the order dated 18.11.2000 passed by XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Aligarh in Criminal Revision No.272 of 2000 accepting the companytention that the informant of the case got a false affidavit filed alongwith protest petition, and therefore numberaction companyld have been taken.
This found acceptance by the learned Sessions Judge.
Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court allowing the revision filed by respondent No.1.
365 of 2007 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J Leave granted.
