It has also been established that M s Pramod Flour Mill, Khelari had numberlicense in 1969.
Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India for the issue of Writ in the nature of habeas companypus.
Shri Jagi Ram has also asserted that he did number purchase any rice from you or from any other place on 2 10 73.
Frank Anthony and S. K. Gambhir, for the petitioner.
W.P. 1496 of 1973 Judgment dated October 11, 1973.
1496 of 1973 judgment dated October 11, 1973.
KRISHNA IYER, J. The petitioner detained by the order of the District Magistrate for anti social proclivity prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the companymunity challenges its validity in this petition for habeas companypus.
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.
That you produced at the time of checking cash memo book and you asserted that out of 50 bags of rice seized oil the said truck, 15 bags of rice were sold to Biswanath Floor Mill, Khelari, 10 bags of rice to Pramod Floor Mill, Khelari and 10 bags to Shri Kundanlal Khelari.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by.
1972 of 1973.
A. I. R. 1960 S. C. 633.
K. Sinha and S. K. Sinha, for the respondents.
On ac tual verification at Khalari by a Magistrate 1st Class, Ranchi, from Shri Bhagwan Singh, Proprietor of M s Pramod Flour Mill, Khelari it has been established that the licence of M s Pramod Flour Mill, Khelari is 9/72 and number 31/69.
