Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated March 3, 1967 of the Bombay High Court in Criminal Applica tion No.
K. Sen, S. G. Sheth and I. N. Shroff, for the appellant.
S. Bindra and S. P. Nayyar, for the respondents.
From this order, the present appeal has been filed by special leave.
497 of the Code and the person released on bail may again be arrested and companymitted to custody by an order of the High Court, the Court Session and the Court granting the bail.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
The appellant was released on bail under orders of Magistrates dated May 11, 1960 and April 1, 1961.
The offence is bailable.
By an order dated March 3/6, 1967, the High Court of Maharashtra, Bombay, in the exercise of its inherent jurisdiction cancelled the bail orders and directed him to surrender to his bail.
120B of the Indian Penal Code read with Sec.
24 of 1967.
561 A of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
64 of 1967.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Bachawat, J. The appellant along with other persons is being tried for an offence under Sec.
5 of the Imports and Exports Control Act, 1947.
A large number of witnesses have been examined but the trial has number yet been companycluded.
167 81 of the Sea Customs Act, 1878, and Sec.
In Talab Haji Hussain v. Madhukar Purshottam Mondkar and another 1 , this Court held that a High Court has the inhe rent power to cancel a bail granted to a person accused of a bailable offence where such an order is necessary to secure the ends of justice or to prevent the abuse of process of any Court, and this power is preserved by Sec.
