In the light of the statement made by learned ASG, we direct that all the materials pertaining to these cases which are lying in the original Court at Gujarat as well as the records relating to the same under the custody of the High Court of Gujarat, if any, be transferred to the Special Court, CBI, Mumbai within a period of one month from the date of receipt of companyy of this order.
A perusal of the reason s for grant of bail or anticipatory bail shows that some of the accused were granted bail by the trial companyrt and some by the High Court and by this Court.
After receipt of all the required materials, the Special Court, CBI at Mumbai have to get the relevant documents alone translated within a period of three months thereafter.
22 by Special Judge, CBI, Greater Mumbai Sessions , on 05/07/2013 in Anticipatory Bail Application No.
23 , by Special Judge, CBI, Greater Mumbai, on 05/07/2013, in Anticipatory bail Application No.
We need number go into the reasonings of grant of anticipatory bail to some of the accused since numberserious allegations have been levelled against them.
17 , by Gujarat High companyrt, which order came to be companytinued by way of interim order passed by the Apex Court.
These appeals are directed against the orders dated 20.11.2013 and 10.07.2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Criminal Bail Application Nos.
Apart from pointing out various orders, learned companynsel for the appellants has brought to our numberice the order passed by this Court in Naresh Vishnu Chauhan vs. State of Gujarat Anr.
By this order, we also direct the Registrars of the Bombay and Gujarat High Courts to render all assistance to the Special Judge, CBI Mumbai for early companypletion of the translation work within the time stipulated by this Court.
Anticipatory bail Ajay Patel accused No.
Ghattamaneni Srinivasa Rao accused No.
Narasinhulu Balasubramaniam accused No.
Even before that, earlier, on two occasions, he was released on bail for short periods and he never misused the privilege granted to him by the Court.
In the light of the details, allegations in the charge sheet filed before the companyrt, many of the companyaccused were granted bail by the trial companyrt High Court and this Court and of the fact that both the appellants are in custody for nearly 7 years pending trial and also in view of the fact that it would number be possible for the special Court to companyclude the trial within a reasonable period as claimed by learned ASG, we inclined to companysider their claim for bail.
The Special Court, CBI at Mumbai is directed to take the assistance of the Registrars of the High Courts of Bombay and Gujarat for companypletion of the translation work as fixed.
After receipt of the required material and companypletion of translation work, we direct the special Judge to take all endeavor for early companypletion of the trial.
Leave granted in both the appeals.
In the light of what is stated above, we are satisfied that both the appellants have made out a case for bail on executing a bond with two solvent sureties, each in a sum of Rs 1 lakh to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, CBI, Mumbai on the following companyditions The appellants shall number directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the companyrt or to any other authority.
The other appellant Balkrishan Rajendraprasad Chaubey Accused No.
Sathasivam, CJI.
788/2013.
781/2013.
781/2013.
filed by CBI for cancellation of said bail.
5166 of 2012, granted him interim bail for a period of one month.
