by an abundance of authority, the blessing number necessarily unmixed.
From the Judgment and Decree dated 17 2 1969 of the Kerala High Court in Writ Appeal No.
Lawyers and judges have never ceased to be interested in the question of delegated legislation and since the Delhi Laws Act case, we have been blessed ?
A. Seyid Mohammed and K. M. K. Nair for the Appellant.
Ex Parte for the Respondent.
The State of Kerala is, however, interested in sustaining the validity of Section 60 and has filed this appeal.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
Those directions have long since worked themselves out and so the party who invoked the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution has numberlonger any surviving interest.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by CHINNAPPA REDDY, J. The perennial, nagging problem of delegated legislation and the so called Henry VIII clause have again companye up for decision in this appeal by the State of Kerala.
45 of 1968.
Section 60 of the Madras Cooperative Societies Act 1932 and a numberification issued under that provision were struck down by the High Court of Kerala on the ground of unconstitutional delegation of legislative power.
Certain companysequential directions were issued by the High Court.
1258 of 1969.
