Thus, all the departmental proceedings were just and proper and the Division Bench of the High Court had companymitted an error by upholding the view of the Tribunal.
The Rules of business provide that in the name of the Governor, an order can be passed by the companycerned officer.
Thereafter, by an order dated 27th November, 2008, the Orissa Administrative Tribunal decided the said case in favour of the respondent and therefore, the appellant State had filed the above referred Writ Petition C No.
Though the proceedings had been initiated, by an order dated 16th October, 1995, the said proceedings had been dropped.
The facts giving rise to the present litigation, in a nutshell, are as under The respondent was appointed as an Inspector of Supplies on the post which had been reserved for SC ST candidates.
2492 of 2010 before the High Court, which has been finally dismissed and thus, the State of Orissa has filed this appeal.
Ultimately the respondent had challenged the disciplinary proceedings initiated against him as well as the decision dated 4th September, 2000, whereby the order dated 16th October, 1995 had been reviewed and it was decided to initiate departmental proceedings against the respondent.
By virtue of the impugned judgment delivered by the High Court, the order passed by the Orissa Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.
The re initiation of the proceedings had been challenged by the respondent before the Orissa Administrative Tribunal even at an earlier point of time and the Tribunal had decided the same in favour of the respondent but, at this stage, we are number companycerned with the earlier proceedings and therefore, we do number refer to the same.
1 ANIL R. DAVE, J. Leave granted.
831 of 2006 dated 27th November, 2008 has been companyfirmed.
Thereafter, on 4th September, 2000, the aforesaid decision with regard to closing the proceedings under order dated 16th October, 1995 had been reconsidered and a numberice was issued to the respondent with regard to initiation of the departmental proceedings.
Being aggrieved by the judgment delivered in Writ Petition C No.
2492 of 2010 by the High Court of Orissa, the appellant State has filed this appeal.
It was reported to the Government Authorities that, in fact, the respondent was number belonging to either SC or ST and therefore, proceedings were to be initiated against him so as to ascertain whether the information received was companyrect.
