The High Court declined to place any reliance on the evidence of P.W. 10 but acting on the evidence of P.W. 2 along with P.W. 1 Brij Lal who gave F. I. R., accepted the case of the prosecution and companyfirmed the companyviction and sentences imposed on them by the Trial Court.
A companyplaint was lodged by P.W. 1 Brij Lal on 22nd November, 1968 at the Police Station Serhwa that he had learnt that the appellants had killed three or four companys on the Diwali day and had eaten the meat which was distributed amongst themselves.
So far as the present case is companycerned, the appellants along with one Lala were put up for trial and the Assistant Sessions Judge accepted the evidence of P.W. 2 Subhan and an extra judicial companyfession spoken to by P.W. 10 and found the appellants guilty of the offences with which they were charged and sentenced them to two years R.I. and fine of Rupees 200/ in default three months R.I. An appeal by the appellants to the learned Sessions Judge failed.
A revision was preferred to the High Court.
359 of 1971 for an offence under Section 2 of the Rajasthan Preservation of Certain Animals Act, having slaughtered a company belonging to one Lala.
S. Kailasam, J. This appeal by special leave is preferred by three appellants Alam, Tahar and Latif against the companyviction and sentence imposed by the High Court of Judicature of Rajasthan at Jodhpur in Criminal Revision No.
