On March 24, 1973 the State Government issued, numberice under Section 52 2 of the Act wherein the owners of the land an other interested persons were called upon to show cause as to why the land be number acquired.
It was at that stage that the appellants challenged the acquisition by way of writ petitions before the High Court.
From, the Judgment and Order dated 21.2 1986 of the Rajasthan High Court in D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.
These appeals have arisen from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Rajasthan under the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 the Act .
A separate numberice dated March 26, 1973 was sent to the appellant Bhawani Singh.
The acquisition proceedings were challenged by the appellants land owners by way of writ petitions under Article 224 of, the Constitution of India before the Rajasthan High Court A learned Single Judge allowed the writ petitions on October 15, 1982 and quashed the proceedings.
Shanti Bhushan, R.K. Jain, P. Chidambaram, M.L. Lahoty, Shambhu Pd.,
Gandhi Grah Nirman Sahkari Samiti Samiti , the appellant, acquired the vacant parcels of the land situated in Rambagh Palace and in the companypound of Raj Mahal companyprising 3,49,000 sq.
The Samiti on June 24, 1972 submitted the development plan to the Urban Improvement Trust, Jaipur the Trust for sanction.
The Trust raised objections and the matter was referred to the State Government.
The Officer on Special Duty, Town Planning Department, Government of Rajasthan heard the objections and submitted his report dated April 2, 1974 for the companysideration of the State Government.
The Judgment of the,,Court was delivered by KULDIP SINGH, J. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions.
The appeals filed by the State of Rajasthan were, however, allowed by the Division Bench of the High Court on February 21, 1986 and the judgment of the learned Single Judge was set aside.
Singh, Ms. Shipra Khazanchi, V.B. Joshi, Sunil Gupta Ms. Deepa Dixit, K.J. John, lndirabir Singh, K,C. Gehani and Prem Sander Jha for the Appellants.
Objections were filed by the Samiti as well as by Bhawani Singh.
These appeals, by the land owners, are against the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court.
After the purchase of the land, the Samiti prepared a development plan of the land according to which 500 residential plots of different sizes were to be developed on the land.
Arun Jaitley Kapil Sibal, Aruneshwar Gupta, Pushpendra, S. Bhat, K. Swami and Rambir Singh Mehta for the Respondents.
The State Government further raised objections and as such the matter remained under companyrespondence for quite some time.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
Civil Appeal Nos.
The land is popularly known as Rambagh area and Princes House or Raj Mahal area.
,318 321 of 1982.
The State Government rejected the objections and issued two numberifications dated July 11, 1974 under Section 52 1 of the Act which were published in the Rajasthan Gazette dated September 27, 1974.
According to the appellants the lands were private properties of Maharaja of Jaipur.
1504 07/1993.
yards for a sum of Rs.1,02,00,000 by way of three deeds of companyveyance executed on March 29, 1972 and registered on April 3, 1972.
