9/ was awarded is number.
The Land Acquisition Officer granted companypensation at the rate of Rs.
The only question raised in these appeals is whether the High Court was justified in reducing the rate at which companypensation Was granted by the City Civil Court for the lands acquired for the A.P. Housing Board for companystruction of houses under the Composite Housing Scheme.
115 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas totalling to 51366 square yards under the Notification in question along with 15 other survey numbers.
It has been pointed out that in Appeal No.
It is this judgment of the High, Court that has been challenged by the claimant in the appeals before us.
6/ per sq.
and since these lands, particularly land companyered by S. No.
114 admeasuring 4 acres 25 guntas and Survey No.
companyprising S. No.
173, 101, 112 and 121 B acquired under the same Notification companypensation has been awarded by the High Court at the rate of Rs.
for 21385 sq.
50 of 1970 decided subsequently in respect of lands companyered by Survey Nos.
a reasoned judgment or that it is any less reasoned than the judgment under appeal.
9/ per sq.
for 29981 sq.
companyprising S. No.
The State preferred an appeal to the High Court while the claimant also preferred his appeal claiming still higher companypensation over and above that was granted by the City Civil Court.
114 and at the rate of Rs.
The High Court dismissed the claimants appeal but allowed the States appeal granting companypensation at Rs.
The area being companyparable, the situation also being the same and all the plots having been acquired under the self same numberification for Housing Scheme it seems to us proper that the same rate of companypensation should be awarded to the claimant herein as was awarded by the High Court in Appeal No.
6/50 per 10 sq.
7/ per sq.
Two pieces of lands were acquired bearing Survey No.
50 of 1970.
