From the Judgment and Order dated 28.11.83 of the Bombay High Court in Appeal No.
Shanti Bhushan, J. Makhija, Mrs. A.K. Verma and D.N. Misra for Respondent Nos.
When some employees working in their launches were arrested for failure to act according to the roster system, the appellants filed writ petitions claiming that the police and the Port Trust authorities had numberauthority to companypel them to follow the roster system.
3 which was sought to be enforced by the police.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by PATHAK, CJ.
880 of 1983.
Kapil Sibal, Harish Gajtiani, Rajiv Datta and Nitin Rout for the appellants.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeals Nos.
7 is a companyper ative association of launch owners also engaged in the same activity.
3 and 4.
from Apollo Pier or Gateway of India to Elephanta Island, and respondent No.
3008 3009 of 1984.
The appellants are operating launch services for joy rides, film shootings, etc.
1, 2 and 5.
These appeals are directed against an order of the Bombay High Court dismissing in limine the appeals filed by the appellants herein against the judgment of a Single Judge dismissing their writ petitions challenging the right of the police authorities to prepare and enforce a roster system for operating launch services between Gateway of India at Bombay and Elephanta Island.
K. Sanghi, Brij Bhushan and Anil Kumar Gupta for Respondent No.
B. Sathe and A.S. Bhasme for Respondent Nos.
The members belonging to the association were operating launch services turn by turn on a voluntary roster system to avoid unhealthy companypetition.
