Though an applica tion for stay was moved, this Court declined to grant stay but passed an order on the 1st May, 1975 imposing certain companydi tions on the movement of Ramlal Narang.
In the meantime the appeal filed by the Union of India against the order of the Delhi High Court relating to the earlier order of detention, was dismissed by this Court in 1977, for want of prosecution.
That petition was dismissed on 25th November, 1975.
A relative of his, filed Writ Petition No.
115/75.
Against that dismissal order Ramlal filed special leave petition No.
2752/75, and the High Court quashed that order of deten tion as per order dated 8th July, 1980.
399/75 and disposed it of saying that it would be open to the petitioner to raise all companytentions available to him in Writ Petition No.
From the Judgment and Order dated 24.10.1986 of the Bombay High Court in W.P. No.
399 of 1975.
Ram Jethmalani and Herjinder Singh for the Respondent.
A few more facts are necessary.
He was brought to India on some express understanding given to the Government of the United Kingdom.
Subsequently, this Court took up appeal No.
Ramlal was detained under the second order.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KHALID, J. The Union of India has brought this appeal by special leave against the Judgment of a full Bench of the Bombay High Court quashing the numberice under Section 6 1 of the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators Forfeiture of Property Act, 1976, hereinafter referred to as SAFEMA.
The facts and the relevant dates have been stated above.
An appeal was filed by Certificate, against that order before this Court as Appeal No.
662 of 1986.
In the mean while, numberices under Section 6 7 of the SAFEMA were issued against Ramlal.
720 of 1975 numberwithstanding what is companytained in the Judgment in Writ Petition No.
It is necessary to set out the brief facts to appreciate the questions involved in this appeal.
720 of 1975, in the Delhi High Court.
These numberices were challenged by him by filing Writ Petition No.
Manoharlal Narang, the respondent in this appeal and Ramlal Narang are brothers.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
115 of 1975, in the Delhi High Court, challenging this detention.
An appeal was filed against that order before this Court by the Union of India.
10/75 and the High Court quashed the order of detention by its order dated 30th April, 1975.
On 1st July, 1975, a fresh order of detention was passed against Ramlal on the same facts and grounds.
Dr. V. Gauri Shanker, Ms. Halida Khatun and Ms. A. Subhashini for the Appellants.
His order of detention was challenged before the Bombay High Court being Writ Petition No.
At that time he was in England.
This order was challenged before the Delhi High Court, in Writ Petition No.
An order of detention was passed on 19th December 1974, under Section 3 1 of the COFEPOSA Act against Ramlal Narang.
An order of detention under COFEPOSA was issued against the present respondent on 31st January, 1975.
The appeal filed against that order before this Court was dismissed on 4th November, 1980.
On 25th June, 1975, Emergency was declared.
743 of 1986.
