After the High Court upheld the validity of the show cause numberices, the companycerned Market Committees should then have issued numberices to the appellants fixing a date, time and place for the hearing of the appellants in response to that show cause numberices, and in that hearing, the appellants should have been allowed to appear either in person or through their representatives and permitted to file their objections and any other material which they wished to produce and only thereafter should the matter have been decided, one way or the other, by the Market Committees companycerned, by a reasoned order after companysidering the response of the appellants as well as the other material.
These Appeals have been filed against the impugned companymon judgment of the High Court of Uttarachal Now, the High Court of Uttarakhand dated 07.07.2005 passed in First Appeal No.
The appellants filed civil suits challenging the said show cause numberices and the matter went upto the High Court which dismissed the suits by the impugned judgment.
It appears that the above procedure was number followed and, hence, in our opinion, there was violation of the principles of natural justice.
Heard learned companynsel for the appearing parties.
The appellants claim to be dealing in certified seeds.
1072 of 2001 and First Appeal No.
1073 of 2001.
3630/2007 3631/2007 In our opinion, the High Court should number have gone into the merits of the matter because it was only dealing with the validity of the show cause numberices in question and number deciding the matter on merits.
Civil Appeal NO s .
Civil Appeal NO s .