4392 of 2004 titled Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. ors.
While in service, he expired on 11.08.1985.
631, 1110 of 2003 and Review Application No.
v. Surji Devi.
Concededly, the deceased was a member of a Contributory Provident Fund companystituted under a Scheme.
The scheme for regularization also came into force in 1986.
Appellant No.
4392 of 2004 WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOs.577 and 587 588 OF 2008 Arising out of SLP Civil Nos.
Respondent was appointed on companypassionate ground in the services of the appellant Corporation in terms of an exgratia scheme.
Concededly, Late Shri Krishans services were never regularized.
For the purpose of disposal of these appeals, we would numbere the factual matrix only from the Civil Appeal arising out of SLP C No.
As the claim of the respondent number 1 for grant of family pension was declined, she filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana.
9311 and 19530 19531 of 2004 B. SINHA, J Leave granted.
Arising out of SLP Civil No.
Despite the same, the respondent filed an application for grant of family pension, which pertains to altogether a different scheme.
Indisputably he companytinued to serve the appellant number 1 in the same capacity.
Respondent Surji Devi is the widow of Late Shri Krishan.
The short question involved in these appeals, arising out of the judgments and orders dated 18.09.2003 and 5.03.2004 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in C.W.P. Nos.
He was appointed on a work charge basis on or about 12.08.1974.
1 was the successor of Haryana State Electricity Board which was companystituted under Section 5 and incorporated under Section 12 of the Electricity Supply Act, 1948.
71 of 2004 respectively, is as to whether family members of a deceased employee who was appointed on a work charged basis would be entitled to family pension?
