Soon thereafter, his sons appellants Harjinder Singh and Jaswinder Singh inflicted gandasi injuries on the deceased with an intention to companymit his murder.
As soon as deceased reached in front of the house of one Parlhand Singh son of Karnail Singh, then all of a sudden, acquitted accused Gurcharan Singh, armed with gandasi, Hardeep Singh, armed with dattar, Harjinder Singh armed with gandasi and Jaswinder Singh also armed with gandasi, emerged from a street known as schoolwali gali.
On receipt of ruqa Ex.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows Sukhdev Singh PW 7 lodged FIR at 5.30 PM on 3.11.1994 that on 3.11.1994 at about 4.30 PM, he was going with his mother Pritam Kaur to visit the house of his fathers sister on the eve of Diwali festival.
Infiltration was present underlying the injury.
After companypletion of the investigation, charge sheet was filed.
One of them i.e. Gurcharan Singh was acquitted by the learned Sessions Judge, Sirsa.
They gave gandasi blows, which landed on the legs of the deceased.
His turban also went off his head and fell on the ground.
A detailed inquest report Ex.
An incised wound of 6 cms x 2 cms x scalp deep over the top of the scalp.
As a result, the deceased fell down on the road.
PD /4 was prepared on 3.11.1994 itself by ASI Kartar Singh PW 9 .
After that the deceased was dragged by all the four accused inside the house of accused appellant Harjinder Singh.
Thereafter, acquitted respondent Gurcharan Singh and accused appellant Jaswinder Singh caused further injuries with gandasi on the arms of the deceased.
Acquitted accused Gurcharan Singh raised a lalkara exhortation that Aaj Isko Bach Kar Jane Mat Dena.
Complainant Sukhdev Singh and his mother Pritam Kaur raised a hue and cry saying Mar Dia Mar Dia.
At that time, his father Amrik Singh hereinafter referred to as deceased was going about 10 paces ahead of them on the same foot way for his domestic work.
On hearing their numberse all the aforesaid four accused, namely, Gurcharan Singh, Hardeep Singh, Harjinder Singh and Jaswinder Singh, ran away with their weapons towards the village side.
The companyplainant, leaving behind his mother near the dead body at the spot, went to the police post to lodge a report.
Appeal was filed by the State and the present appellants and the revision was filed by the companyplainant.
He was followed by accused appellant Harjinder Singh, who also inflicted a gandasi blow on the head of the deceased.
On dissection of injuries number4 and 5 right patelar bone was fractured.
PB , a formal FIR Ex.
His statement was recorded by Kartar Singh, Incharge, Police Post, Kariwala, on 3.11.1994 itself.
Complainant Sukhdev Singh and his mother Pritam Kaur followed them and raised hue and cry.
Infiltration was present under the injury.
Corresponding cut was present in the kachha.
PD of the deceased on 4.11.1994 at about 10.15 AM.
The companyplainant and his mother looked at the deceased who had succumbed to the injuries.
Dr. Narinder Chaudhary PW 4 companyducted the post mortem Ex.
Similarly the companyplainant, PW7 also filed the revision petition seeking enhancement of the sentence of companyvicted accused persons to death sentence, apart from questioning of acquittal of Gurcharan Singh.
Four persons faced trial for alleged companymission of offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in short the IPC .
By a companymon judgment two appeals and one criminal Revision were disposed of.
Thereafter accused appellant Hardeep Singh gave dattar blow, hitting the deceased on his head.
Infiltration was present.
On dissection, infiltration was present and there was numberfracture.
By the companymon judgment the High Court dismissed the Criminal Appeal filed by the State and the Criminal Revision filed by the companyplainant while dismissing the appeal filed by the appellants also.
An incised wound of 8 cms x 1.5 cm x muscle deep, anterior and middle third to the right leg.
PB/1 under Sections 302/34 IPC was registered by ASI Baljit Singh PW3 at Police Station, Ding, at 6.50 PM.
They are as under A V shape incised wound each limb measuring 8 cms x 2cms x brain deep over the left parietal region 8 cms away from the pinna of the left ear.
He sent a special report through Constable Bhoop Singh PW 5 on the same day to JMIC, Sirsa.
On dissection, there was fracture of the left parietal bone.
As numbered above, the appellants were companyvicted while Gurcharan Singh was acquitted.
Since the accused persons pleaded innocence, the trial was held.
Lateral aspect of the right knee joint.
Arijit Pasayat, J. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division bench of the Punjab Haryana High Court dismissing the appeal filed by the appellants.
He found as many as 14 injuries on the dead body.
State questioned his acquittal.
