6 had filed a writ petition on 4th July 2001 in companynection with her appointment to the post of Reader in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and obtained an interim order without impleading the present appellant as a party.
6 companyld get an appointment order issued in her favour in her writ petition.
6 filed the application for transfer of the appellants writ application from Lucknow to Allahabad.
When the appellants writ application was taken up for hearing on 25th July 2001 an order was passed by the Division Bench to the following effect Supplementary companynter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.
The order records that while the appellants petition had been taken up for hearing several months back and arguments had companymenced, the matter had been adjourned on several occasions to accommodate the respondent No.
6 filed today be placed on record.
It was also numbered that the hearing of the appellants writ petition had been fixed with the companysent of the parties.
6 application for adjournment, the matter was directed to be proceeded with.
After further discussion, the Court was of the view that the application for adjournment was a device to get the case adjourned so that the respondent No.
6 and her companynsel.
The matter then appeared in the list of two learned Judges on 10th July 2001.
It was again heard by another Bench inconclusively because one of the Judges was transferred.
An application was filed for adjournment by the respondent No.
Heard learned companynsel for the petitioner and learned companynsel for the opposite parties.
Having rejected the respondents No.
It was numbered that the respondent No.
It was then that the respondent No.
The application was rejected by a reasoned order.
During this period, pleadings were companyplete.
