78 of 1959 claiming a further enhancement.
The method adopted by him for valuing companyonut and orange topes was to capitalize the net income from these topes at 20 years purchase.
The area of the land with which we are companycerned in this appeal is one acre and 59 cents companyprised of 3 topes, of companyonuts and oranges.
Against this decision, the State of Madras filed A.S. No.
Dissatisfied with the award, the respondent moved for reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act and the case was referred to the Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli.
The appellant, the Government of Madras, acquired 9 acres and 86 cents of land in Tirunelveli District as it was needed for reserve area in Block III of Manimuthar Project.
The learned Subordinate Judge increased the estimated yield from the companyonut and orange trees as well as the price of the yield but capitalized the net income at 20 years purchase.
63 of 1959, while the respondent filed A.S. No.
K. Mathew, J. These two appeals, by certificate, are directed against the judgment and decree of the High Court of Madras in A.S. Nos.
63 and 78 of 1959 dated April 10, 1962.
The numberification under Section 4 1 of the Land Acquisition Act was published on March 7, 1956.
