a petition challenging the companystitutional validity of certain provisions must be in the companytext of certain facts and number in abstract or vacuum.
from the judgement and order dated 3.3.1986 of the high court of punjab and haryana in civil writ petition number 1055 of 1986.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 1637 of 1987.
on this ground it is number possible to decide the question of vires canvassed before the high companyrt and repeated before us.
s. suri for the respondent.
the appellant states that he is the owner of certain premises in punjab.
the essential facts necessary to examine the validity of the act are lacking in this appeal.
bagga for the appellant.
k. bagga and mrs.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by sabyasachi mukharji j. this appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order of the high companyrt of punjab haryana dated the 3rd march 1986 dismissing the writ petition in limine under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india filed by the appellant before the high court.
