CIVIL APPEAL NO.
5495 OF 2000 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of the Karnataka High Court dismissing the Writ Appeal filed by the appellants.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows Respondent No.1 Union filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court for a declaration that the companyditions imposed under the Textile Workers Rehabilitation Fund Scheme in short the TWRFS to the effect that the mill should have been closed under Section 25 O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in short the Act or the official liquidators should have been appointed offend Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, 1950 in short the Constitution and for directing the appellants by a writ of mandamus to extend the benefits of TWRFS to the members of the Union with all companysequential reliefs including monetary benefits.
