it appears that the relations between late issac alfred and his widow smt.
in his suit elic alfred had pleaded that in view of the will his deceased brothers widow and children were number entitled to any benefit from the railway authorities instead he was entitled to the deceaseds estate including the right to receive family pension and other dues.
the appellants thereupon made an application before the central administrative tribunal chandigarh for the issue of a direction for the release of the amounts on account of gratuity group insurance provident fund ctd account and family pension.
the civil companyrt issued an injunction order restraining the appellants from receiving any amount from the railway authorities as a result of which the railway administration did number pay any amount to them.
account gratuity family pension and other dues.
the appellants pleaded that the will relied upon by elic alfred was a forged one and elic alfred was number entitled to receive pensionary benefits.
on an application made by the appellants the suit pending before the civil companyrt was also transferred to the tribunals file.
violet issac widow of the deceased employee made an application before the competent railway authority for the grant of family pension and for payment of gratuity and other dues to her her four sons and one daughter who are appellant number.
the tribunal by its order dated 11.
ashri for the respondent.
when the appellants raised claim for family pension and other dues before the railway authorities elic alfred filed civil suit number 365/85 for the issue of a permanent injunction restraining the appellants from receiving or claiming any monetary benefits from the railway administration.
briefly the facts giving rise to this appeal are that issac alfred was employed in the railway workshop jagadhri as a skilled mechanic tool shop he died in harness on 16.10.1984.
violet issac and the children were number companydial as a result of which he had made numberination in favour of his brother and further he had executed a will dated 9.9.1984 in favour of elic alfred bequeathing all his properties to him including the family pension gratuity etc.
the dispute between the parties relates to gratuity provident fund family pension and other allowances but this companyrt while issuing numberice to the respondents companyfined the dispute only to family pension.
12.1989 of the central administrative tribunal chandigarh in o.a.
the appellants have challenged the order of the tribunal by means of the present appeal.
the tribunal further directed for the transfer of the civil suit to the civil companyrt for trial in accordance with law.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 653 of 1991.
sharma and inderjit singh mehra for the appellants.
the railway authorities did number pay any amount to the appellants as an injunction order had been issued by the sub judge 1st class jagadhri in civil suit number 365/85 filed by elic alfred brother of the deceased employee restraining the appellants from claiming or receiving any amount which were to the credit of the deceased railway employee towards t.d.
number 694 of 1988.
from the judgment and order dated 11.
anand prakash b. krishna prasad and s.m.
avadh behari a.k.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by singh j. leave granted.
on his death a dispute arose between mrs.
