The appellant had been companyvicted under Sections 307/34, 325/34 and 323/34 and awarded a sentence of three years with fine for the first mentioned offence and to lesser terms of imprisonment for the other offences.
The impugned order of the High Court was made observing that in view of the companypromise entered into between the parties, the sentence on the appellant would be till the rising of the Court along with a fine of 10,000/ .
This order has been challenged by the appellant seeking an outright acquittal.
We have heard the learned companynsel for the parties.
As of today he has undergone only one day of the sentence.
A. 415 of 2007 appellant by the High Court should number be enhanced, as the said order was companypletely companytrary to all principles of law as it trivialised a serious offence.
