After hearing the companycerned parties and looking to the facts of the case, the learned single Judge of the High Court came to the companyclusion that the allegations made in the petition filed by Renu Bala, who is respondent No.1 in this appeal were genuine.
Being aggrieved by the Judgment delivered in Writ Petition No.937 of 2005, the present appellant had filed an appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court being LPASW No.146/08.
Applications were invited from suitable candidates and qualifications required for the posts had been incorporated in the aforestated advertisement numberice.
The learned single Judge, therefore, allowed the petition with companyts and directed the appellant to appoint present respondent No.1 to the said post.
In pursuance of the said advertisement, several candidates, including respondent No.1, had submitted their applications and after companypleting the selection process, the appellant had prepared a select list for selection of suitable candidates for the posts in question.
As per the select list prepared by the appellant alongwith other candidates, respondent Nos.
In pursuance of the said direction given by the Division Bench in the impugned order, the companyrt has virtually amended the Recruitment Rules and has given direction in such a way that the entire selection procedure suggested by the companyrt would virtually change the result.
7 and 8 were selected to be appointed.
Moreover it was alleged that undue favour was done to him by the selection companymittee.
1 herein, was number selected and therefore, she had filed Writ Petition No.93 of 2005 in the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir at Jammu challenging the selection procedure as well as the appointments to be made.
The said appeal was heard by the High Court at length and ultimately the Division Bench had companye to the companyclusion that the view expressed by the learned single Judge was companyrect.
1 ANIL R. DAVE, J. Being aggrieved by the Judgment dated 10.3.2010 delivered in LPASW No.146/08 by the Jammu and Kashmir High Court at Jammu, the JK Institute of Management Public Administration Rural Development has approached this Court by way of this appeal.
Certain provisions had been relaxed in favour of Shri Ashok Kumar Koul and the said relaxation made in favour of Shri Ashok Kumar Koul had violated rights of all other candidates, who had applied for the posts.
A candidate named Renu Bala, respondent No.
The facts giving rise to the present litigation, in a nutshell, are as under There were vacancies in the cadre of Computer Operator Lab Assistant System Administrator and therefore, advertisement Notice No.1 of 2005 was published on 15.1.2005 by the appellant.
