The other appeal i.e. Civil Appeal No.
This Court further directed that the companyy of the report of the Cost Accounts Wing be given to the parties and to the Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission in short the State Commission .
CCLs case is that the Cost Accounts Wing of M s. Ernst Young only on the basis of the documents supplied by DLF have carried out the exercise of determining the actual capital companyt of the two power plants without even asking for any companyments or any inputs from CCL while working out the actual capital companyt.
Civil Appeal No.
It was further directed that the State Commission on receipt of the report shall determine the tariff as per the terms of the Power Purchase Agreement between the parties for the two power plants.
Both of them separately determined the tariff for the subsequent year after the first year based on the actual capitalization companyt supplied by the Cost Accountants.The Commission companysisted of two members one was the Chairman and the other was the Member Technical .
3561 of 2006 has been filed by Central Coalfields Limited in short the CCL under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 in short the Act impugning the judgment and order dated 11th May, 2006 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, New Delhi in short the Appellate Tribunal in Appeal No.166 of 2005.
By order dated 11.7.2007 this companyrt directed the Cost Accounts Wing of M s. Ernst Young to determine the actual capital companyt based on the formula in the Power Purchase Agreement dated 8.2.1993 between CCL and DLF.
These two Civil Appeals are inter related and are, therefore, disposed of by this companymon order.
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT.
3109 of 2006 has been filed by DLF Power Limited in short the DLF challenging part of the judgment dated 11.5.2006 passed by the Appellate Tribunal.
