a swelling of the size 6 cm x 4 cm was found on the right cheek.
1 and 3 assaulted the deceased and PW 4, Viyakula Mary.
Veracity of statements of the said witnesses to that effect was number tested in the cross examination.
Appellant with Jesu Raj and Arokiyam were proceeded against for companymission of an offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The fact that an incident had occurred a few days prior to the incident in question is also number in dispute.
PW 1 and PW 4 have proved enmity between the parties.
All the accused were held guilty of the charges leveled against them.
The learned Sessions Judge relying on or on the basis of the material brought on record accepted the deposition of PW 1, Kolandaisamy.
1 is said to have caused damage to the pipeline of the water of the house of the deceased.
The distance between the place of occurrence and Nilakkottai Police Station is about 3 kms.
He was threatened with dire companysequences, if he intervened, by the accused No.
Appellant assaulted the deceased with a wood log which was marked as M.O.1.
The Investigating Officer reached the place of occurrence at about 2.00 a.m. Thus, the investigation companymenced immediately after the lodging of the First Information Report.
Two weeks prior to the incident again, the deceased was assaulted resulting in initiation of a criminal proceeding against the accused.
Homicidal death of Maria Michel stands undisputed.
3 catching hold of the deceased.
They came back to the scene of occurrence and found that the deceased had expired.
The deceased suffered atleast three fractures on his head.
Below the right eye a bruise of size 2 cm x 2 cm was found.
The following anti mortem injuries were found on the person of the deceased On the back side of the head a bruise of the size 3 cm x 2 cm was found.
PW 1 ran from the spot.
Four months thereafter, the appellant accused No.
PW 1 met PW 2 Saveriar and informed him about the incident that had taken place.
on the back of the left side of the head a bruise of size 3 cm x 2 cm was found.
Inquest of the dead body was companyducted between 3.00 a.m. and 5.00 a.m. He had also examined some witnesses being PWs.
It is also evident from the post mortem examination report that the injuries on the deceased companyld have been caused by a log of wood which was marked as M.O.1.
Outside the right was totally blackened.
PW 1 went to Nilakottai police station.
Deceased questioned thereabout.
The First Information Report was received by the Investigating officer, PW 10, at 1.00 a.m. on 27th November, 1994.
1, 2, 5 and 6.
The deceased fell down but still was repeatedly assaulted.
The body was sent for post mortem examination.
He allegedly hid himself in a bush.
On the right side of the eye brow a bruise of size 2 cm x 1 cm was found.
The Investigating officer reached the place of occurrence at about 2.00 A.M. He recovered bipod stained earth and a blue shawl.
2 with a knife.
A few months before the incident in question,, allegedly the haystack of the deceased was put on fire.
He saw the accused No.
A First Information Report was lodged at about 1.00 A.M. on 27th November, 1994.
Autopsy was companyduced at about 11.15 a.m. on 27th November, 1994.
On 26th November, 1994 at about 9.00 p.m. while the deceased and the informant Kolandaisamy PW 1 were proceeding towards their house from Nilakkottai Market on their bicycles, somebody had flashed torch light on the deceased.
Right eye was closed.
At that time PW 1 also flashed light from his torch towards the opposite direction and saw the appellant.
B. Sinha, J. Leave granted.
They rushed to their village.
He immediately came to the site.
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 18th January, 2006 passed by a Division Bench of the Madras High Court in Criminal Appeal No.
He was chased.
On the front side of the head a swelling of size 3 cm x 3 cm was found.
142 of 1997 whereby and whereunder the appeal filed by the appellant against an order of companyviction dated 30th January, 1997 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul Anna District, was dismissed.
On the upper portion of the head a swelling of the size 3 cm x 3 cm was found.
