The case of the workman was that he joined the present appellants as Chowkidar and worked therein from 1.6.1985 to 24.8.1986.
Their strength increased decreased with the increase decrease of the food grains stocks.
The services of the daily wages Chowkidars were dispensed with on becoming surplus.
His services were dispensed with on becoming surplus alongwith others.
The services of the claimant were dispensed with as he was surplus.
The services of the Chowkidars on daily wages end with the end of each working day.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows The dispute in three appeals being companymon, factual position in Civil Appeal No.
7637 of 2004 is numbered.
His services ended with the end of each working day.
He is companyered under the Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act, 1946 in short the Standing Orders Act .
He was working in the department on daily wages as fixed by the Deputy Commissioner, Sangrur from time to time.
It was also pleaded in the preliminary objections that there are three categories of Chowkidars in the Food and Supplies Department to safeguard the food grains stocks.
The Labour Court relied on certain documents and companycluded that the workman had worked for more than 240 days.
Civil Appeal No.7637/2004 Reference was made to the Labour Court under Section 10 1 c of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in short the ID Act of the following purported dispute Whether termination of services of Gurmit Singh Workman is justified and in order?
It was stated in the written statement inter alia that the claimant was working as Chowkidar on daily wages.
The Management did number companyply with the principles of natural justice while terminating his services.
The workman in the present case belonged to the third category i.e. daily wages Chowkidar.
The claim of the claimant that he had worked from 1.6.1986 to 24.8.1986 is number companyrect.
The third category companysists of daily wages Chowkidars who draw fixed daily wage from time to time fixed by the department of companycerned districts.
With Civil Appeals Nos.
No numberice or enquiry or companypensation was required as the claimant was a worker on daily wages.
He was getting Rs.400/ p.m. at that time as wages.
His services were terminated on 25.8.1986 by the Management without service of any numberice, holding of any enquiry or payment of any companypensation.
If number, to what relief is he entitled?
The numberice of reference was given to the present appellants.
6766/2004 and 2608/2004 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Challenge in these appeals is to the judgment of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing the writ petitions filed by the present appellants.
Challenge in the writ petitions was to the order passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Patiala in short the Labour Court .
