By a numberification issued under Section 4 of the Act, dated 3 10 1969, and gazetted on the same day, a certain parcel of land at Cavelossim Village, Salcete Taluka in the State of Goa was proposed to be acquired for a public purpose namely, for companystruction of an air to ground range for the Indian Navy.
420 of 1981, which was disposed of on 24 6 1985 whereby the rate for determination of companypensation was revised to Rs.
Both these applications were dismissed by the Deputy Collector on 3 9 1988 as time barred, having been preferred after the expiry of the period of three months prescribed by the statute.
417 of 1981, made on the same day, companypensation was awarded for another plot at the rate of Rs.
Feeling aggrieved, both the appellants questioned the decision by filing separate writ petitions on 11 2 1989.
24584 of 1995 made a similar application under Section 28 A of the Act on 28 4 1987.
24435 of 1995, applied, on 13 5 1987, under Section 28 A of the Act, for redetermination of companypensation for his plot of land.
The declaration under Section 6 of the Act was made and published in the Gazette on 10 6 1971.
In appeal, the High Court, by its judgment dated 24 2 1987, reduced the rate to Rs.
406 of 1981 on 14 10 1985, companypensation was allowed a for a different plot at Rs.
Thereafter, the Land Acquisition Officer awarded companypensation for the acquired lands at rates ranging from Re 0.75 to Rs.
This award was made on 2 8 1972.
The possession of the land was taken by the Government on 2 4 1970.
A reference was sought and made to the learned District Judge, LAC No.
9 per sq.m.
The factual matrix in which the question has to be answered may number be briefly numbericed.
So also, the appellant in civil appeal arising from SLP No.
Thereafter, the appellant in civil appeal arising from SLP No.
However, in another award made in LAC No.
5 per sq.m.
5 per sq.m.
10 per sq.m.
2.50 per sq.m.
In yet another award, in LAC No.
for different plots companyprising the land under acquisition.
