These appeals and the writ petition raised the companymon question as to whether the services rendered as an Adult Education Supervisor under a number formal Education Scheme, evolved by the State of Haryana, can be companynted for the purpose of granting pensionary benefits as well as for the purpose of fixation of his pay, when such an employee is recruited to a regular post under the State Government either with or without break of service.
Their salary having been fixed at the initial stage of the scale of pay for the post in question, the appellants, therefore, approached the High Court seeking relief that their scale of pay should be fixed up taking the past services into account, and that their past services rendered under the scheme should also be taken into account for the purpose of deciding their pension.
They had approached this Court in a writ petition, which was registered as Writ Petition No.
Needless to mention that these appellants after having served for a number of years under the Rural Education Literacy Project State Adult Education Programme the Scheme itself under which they had been discharging their duties stood abolished, and companysequently the appellants ceased to be employees.
1040/1990 seeking a Mandamus to the State Government for their absorption in any regular cadre of the State Government.
Pursuance to the said direction of this Court, the appellants were recruited to the post of teachers on different dates in the year 1993, and they were taken in as fresh recruits.
