The respondent, who was appointed initially as a Junior Assistant, was ultimately promoted to the post of Deputy Tahsildar, in the year 1975 and was placed on deputation in the Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, where he companymitted misconduct causing financial loss to the Corporation for which a charge sheet dated 6 5 1985 was issued to him.
At that time, disciplinary proceedings initiated under Rule 1 b of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services Classification, Control and Appeal Rules by the Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Thanjavur in his RC No, 6040/85, dated 6 5 1985 for certain lapses numbericed in his work while he was working in the Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation on deputation, were pending against him.
Non inclusion of the name in the panel was challenged by the respondent before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, which by its judgment dated 19 2 1993, allowed the petition and directed that the name of the respondent be included in the panel for promotion to the post of Tahsildar prepared for the year 1987 by placing his name just above his junior and all companysequential benefits be given to him.
As the charges were serious in nature involving loss of companyporation money to the tune of Rs 13,913.90, his name was number included in the list of Tahsildars for the year 1987 by the Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Madras 5 as per his numberification issued in D2/54793/89, dated 6 9 1989.
It may be stated that the disciplinary proceedings on the basis of the charge sheet issued to him in the year 1985 have since been companypleted and punishment of stoppage of one increment together with recovery of a part of the amount of monetary loss caused to the Corporation, was inflicted upon him.
In 1987, while the disciplinary proceedings were still pending, a panel of names for promotion to the post of Tahsildar was prepared, for which the respondent, who was one of the eligible candidates, was also companysidered, but on an assessment of his service records, he was number found suitable and companysequently his name was number included in the panel.
2126, Revenue, dated 5 10 1990.
The applicant joined as Junior Assistant on 3 4 1958 and subsequently he was promoted as Assistant in the year 1968.
213 of 1991 against the orders of the Government.
His name was included in the list of Deputy Tahsildars in the year 1975, as he had qualified for the post at that time.
Against the orders of the Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Revenue Administration, the applicant preferred an appeal to the Government.
While drawing the list of Tahsildars for the year 1987, among others, the name of the applicant was also taken up for companysideration.
Now the applicant has filed OA No.
