The applicants were to fulfil the requisite educational qualifications as on the last date of the submission of the application form.
The result of the recruitment examination was declared on 17.5.2014.
Finally, direction to appoint the respondent to the post of Teacher Grade III Level I with all companysequential benefits was sought.
After representing and number eliciting the required response, the writ petition which led to the present appeal W.P.No.2801/2015 came to be filed seeking to quash final select list dated 16.3.2015 and to direct the appellants to declare the selection list of the respondent as marks secured were higher than the cut off in the respective category.
The High Court further directed that the results to be declared.
The companytroversy which falls to be resolved by us is whether the High Court was right in holding that the proviso to Rule 266 3 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 hereinafter referred to as the Rules which was relied upon by the respondent remained intact despite the substitution of Rule 266 3 by Notification dated 11.5.2011.
Though the respondent secured marks which was more than the cut off, his name was number found in the Select List dated 16.3.2015.
Finding that the result of the examination in regard to the respondent and another was number uploaded on the official website, they filed writ petition No.244/2015.
The writ petitioner who is the respondent hereinafter referred to as the respondent was undergoing the S.T.C. Course B.S.T.C. is an essential qualification stipulated .
The appellant discovered during the process of verification that the respondent was number holding the requisite qualification of B.S.T.C. as on the last date for submission of application form.
In appeal filed by the respondent, by the impugned order, however, the division Bench allowed the writ petition.
The appellant filed companynter affidavit.
He, however, applied pursuant to the advertisement.
M. JOSEPH, J. Leave granted.
The respondent was called for verification of documents.
Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ASHA SUNDRIYAL Date 2019.09.12 164152 IST Reason The appellant issued an advertisement on 11.8.2013 for recruiting Teachers Grade III Level I and II in the various Zila Parishads in the State of Rajasthan.
The respondent secured 158.41 marks.
The advertisement stipulated the last date for submission of the application form as 4.9.2013.
An interim order was passed in the said writ petition to bring the result of the petitioner in a sealed companyer before the Court.
The respondent appeared on the basis of an order passed by the High Court permitting him and others to submit their application however, it was subject to the decision in SBCWP No.10845/2013.
Thereafter, he companypleted his S.T.C. second year companyrse and the results were also declared.
