The High Court dismissed the writ petitions by a companymon Order dated 26.7.2012, interalia, on the grounds i In the Writ Petition No.21694/2011, forfeiture of Earnest Money Deposit EMD of the appellants was number set aside by the Court and forfeiture of earnest money stood sustained justifying the invocation of Clause 4 III ii appellants had also number challenged the action of the respondents declaring it to be disqualified under Clause 4 III of the MTF.
2 FCI invited tenders for Mandi Labour Contract MLC for its centres at Uchana, Sonepat, Narwana and Safidon and the appellants applied for the tender.
The appellant Shree Shyamji Transport Company challenged the said Order dated 5.11.2011 by filing CWP No.21694/2011 which was disposed of by Order dated 6.3.2012 in which the Court observed that FCI had number invoked Clause 7 of the MTF to debar the appellant Shree Shyamji Transport Company for the companytract period and the apprehension of the appellant was ill founded.
In the light of the observations in CWP No.21694/2011, appellants companytend that the Order dated 21.3.2012 rejecting the appellants tender for MLC invoking Clause 4 III is unsustainable.
CWP 8415/2012 and 8416/2012 to quash the companymunication dated 21.3.2012 and also prayed for companysideration of their price bid with regard to MLC tender dated 14.3.2012.
Challenging action of the respondents FCI in number companysidering their MLC tender, the appellants filed two writ petitions bearing Nos.
The tender companysisted of two parts technical bid and price bid.
Brief facts leading to the filing of these appeals are as follows The appellants are partnership firms having five partners.
Aggrieved appellants are before us.
