It numbered that the learned companynsel for the accused persons who were the appellants before the High Court did number challenge the finding of companyviction but only prayed for reduction in sentence.
The companyviction was recorded by learned Session Judge Chhatarpur, who imposed the aforesaid sentences.
By the impugned judgment, the High Court directed the sentence to be reduced to the period already undergone.
Respondent accused Ghanshyam was similarly sentenced.
Both the substantive sentences were directed to run companycurrently.
829/2000 in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh.
