369 and 391.
From the Judgment and Order dated 19 8 1965 of the Allahabad High Court in CiVil Misc.
150 Cross objections were filed by the appellants in respect of the disallowance of their objection regarding khata Nos.
The appellants thereafter filed the writ petition for a writ of certiorari to quash the orders dated June 15, 1964 and September 17, 1964.
369 and 391.
The appellants then went up in revision, but the revision was dismissed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation as per order dated September 17, 1964.
So far as khata No.
The respondents went up in appeal against the order of the Consolidation Officer in so far as had held that the appellants were joint tenants in khata No.
150 is companycerned, the Settlement Officer held that the appellants were number joint tenants in that khata.
The cross objections of the appellants were dismissed by the Settlement Officer on the ground that they were barred by time.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
He, howev er, held that the appellants were joint tenants along with the respondents in khata.
Writ No.
150, 369 and The Consolidation Officer rejected the claims of the appellants in respect of khatas Nos.
The said petition, as stated above, was dismissed.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KHANNA, J. This appeal on certificate is against the order of Allahabad High Court whereby that Court dismissed in limine the writ petition filed by the appellants, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the order dated June 15, 1964 of the Settlement officer and the order dated September 17, 1964 of the Deputy Director of Consolidation of Holdings.
K. Sen and E.C. Agarwala, for the appellants M s. J.PGoyal Pal Singh, for respondents Nos.
1643 of 1968.
The appellants raised objection before the companysolida tion authorities on the ground that they along with the respondents were joint tenants in Khatas Nos.
5475/64 .
The dispute between the parties relates to khata No.
