This order of the learned single Judge came to be affirmed by the Division Bench of the High Court.
3 in the writ petition on the same terms and companyditions either in the Government Department or in the Government Corporations within three months.
It is number clear as to what was the companynection between the respondent Corporation and the State Government.
This appeal by the Government of India in the Ministry of Commerce is directed against the order passed by the learned single Judge of the High Court of Madras in Writ Petition No.
The decision of this Court is virtually a number speaking order which does number set out the facts and the circumstances in which the direction came to be issued against the Government.
Paragraph 6 of the Judgment shows that the High Court without deciding on the question whether any such direction companyld be issued against the Government of India proceeded to companyclude the matter on the basis of the aforementioned decision of this Court.
3949 of 1990 whereby he directed that the employees of the Leather Garment unit of the State Trading Corporation, whose services were terminated on the closure of the unit, shall be companytinued in service by the Government of India respondent No.
In passing this order, the learned single Judge based his decision on this Courts order in G. Govinda Rajulu v. Andhra Pradesh State Construction Corporation Limited, 1986 Supp SCC 651, in which this Court made a brief order in these terms We have carefully companysidered the matter and after hearing learned Counsel for the parties, we directed that the employees of the Andhra Pradesh State Construction Corporation Limited whose services were sought to be terminated on account of the closure of the Corporation shall be companytinued in service on the same terms and companyditions either in the government department or in the government companyporations.
Special leave granted.
It was companytended by the third respondent Government of India that it was for the State Trading Corporation to deal with the problem of number employment of the petitioners and number the Government of India, These companytentions are borne out from paragraph 5 of the Judgment of the learned single Judge.
There is numberorder as to companyts.
