The applicant respondent number1 herein had filed an application for appointment as primary school Assistant Teacher Hindi in Bangalore Rural District.
For that purpose reliance was placed on proceedings of the Government of Karnataka Order No.
Challenge before the High Court was to the order passed by the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal in short the Tribunal .
The same was rejected on the ground that he did number possess the requisite qualification.
EF.43 PHN 72 Bangalore, Dated the 24/26th August, 1974 .
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows Respondent number1 filed an application before the Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 in short the Act praying to quash the selection made by the appellants and for a direction to include his name for selection under category IIB reserved category and to issue order of appointment as primary school teacher in the Hindi subject.
Challenging order of the Tribunal, a writ petition was filed before the High Court reiterating the stand that the qualification possessed by the respondent number1 was number equivalent to TCH but was equivalent to TTC.
Arising out of SLP C No.
C1.Pra.
23576 of 2004 ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Ne/01/2001 02 dated 8.9.2001 are as follows Must have passed PUC and TCH or equivalent examinations But the candidates who had taken admission to TCH companyrse prior to 1989 will be eligible if they have passed SSLC and TCH or equivalent examination.
Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court dismissing writ petition filed by the appellants.
