Indisputably an advertisement was issued on 9th August, 1998 for filling up 10 posts of Physical Education Teacher Grade III.
A Full Bench of the said Court by a judgment and order dated 18th November, 1999 held the said provision to be unconstitutional.
Aggrieved by and dissatisfied therewith, the appellants filed an intra companyrt appeal being D.B. Special Appeal W No.
Appellants preferred an intra companyrt appeal thereagainst.
The said writ petitions remained pending.
Upon declaration of the said law by the Full Bench of the High Court, appellants herein filed two writ petitions being No.
Allegedly the State of Rajasthan appointed Bhanwar Lal Gosar Mothsar by an order dated 12th June, 2003.
However, in the meanwhile one Duli Chand had filed a writ application being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1401 of 2003 before the High Court.
Appellants submitted their representations on 10th July, 2005 which were rejected by the respondents by an order dated 30th September, 2005.
1818/2001 and 1802/2001 before the said High Court inter alia companytending that in view of the said Full Bench decision, their position would be at serial Nos.
Two writ petitions were filed by the appellants.
A Division Bench of the High Court, however, by reason of the impugned judgment and order refused to interfere in the matter on the premise that the issue stands squarely companyered by the decision of this Court in Kailash Chand Sharma supra .
103 of 2004 which was disposed of by a Division Bench of the High Court giving liberty to the appellants to make a representation to the companycerned authority within ten days with a direction to the authority to dispose of the same within three months thereafter.
6 and 9 in the merit list.
Validity and or legality of the said provision for grant of bonus marks was questioned before the said High Court by filing writ petition in the year 1999.
10 Bonus marks were to be granted for candidates who were resident of a particular district, while 5 bonus marks to the candidates belonging to rural areas.
147 of 2006.
5510/2003 1818/2001 and 1802/2002 were also dismissed by the same learned Judge by an order dated 5th December, 2003.
Appellants challenged the said order before the High Court by filing yet another writ application being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9253 of 2005, which was dismissed by a learned Single Judge of the said Court following the order passed in Duli Chand supra .
B. SINHA, J. Leave granted.
The question was referred to a Full Bench.
Interpretation of a decision of this Court in Kailash Chand Sharma v. State of Rajasthan and others, 2002 6 SCC 562 is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 14th February, 2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Rajasthan.
Jaipur Bench, Jaipur in B. Civil Special Appeal W No.
