The appellant satisfactorily companypleted the probation period and was companyfirmed in that post.
This appeal is directed against the order dated 30th June, 2008, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in L.P.A. No.120 of 2008 in Writ Petition No.4166 of 1997.
The respondents herein, aggrieved by the said judgment of the Tribunal, filed a writ petition before the learned Single Judge of the High Court.
The appellant challenged the order of termination before the School Tribunal, Kolhapur.
Despite opportunity, numbercounter affidavit has been filed by the respondents.
The appellant, aggrieved by the judgment of the Division Bench, has approached this Court by way of this appeal.
The respondents, aggrieved by the said judgment of the learned Single Judge preferred a Letters Patent Appeal before the 2/ 2 High Court.
The learned Single Judge examined the matter in detail and dismissed the writ petition upholding the judgement of the Tribunal.
The Division Bench, without analyzing the findings of the Tribunal, which were upheld by the learned Single Judge, set aside the order of the learned Single Judge and remanded the case to the learned Single Judge.
The appellants services were terminated by order dated 6th November, 1995.
This Court issued numberice on 14th November, 2008, and stayed the operation of the impugned judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court.
The Tribunal, by its order dated 26th June, 1997, held the order of termination as illegal, ineffective and ab initio void and quashed the same.
Leave granted.
The brief facts, which are relevant for the purpose of disposal of this appeal, are recapitulated as under The appellant was appointed as a Clerk by order dated 13th October, 1993, wherein it has been clearly indicated that his appointment was made on probation for a period of two years against a clear permanent vacancy.
