The Valuation Committee assessed the same at Rs.
3,74,90,300/ and registration charges of Rs.
A report of a chartered designated valuer was enclosed with the said application.
An endorsement on the deed of companyveyance was made by Respondent No.
Appellant No.
A deed of companyveyance was executed by Appellant No.
With a view to pre assess the stamp duty payable on the instrument of sale and the impact thereof, an application was filed by the appellants for adjudication of the Collector in terms of Section 31 of the Act which occurs in Chapter III thereof.
1 herein is a public limited companypany incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956.
The Collector of Janjgir District, on receipt of the said application, formed a Valuation Committee companyprising of Sub Divisional Officer Revenue as Chairman, Sub Divisional Officer Building Roads PWD, Sub Divisional Officer Forest Champa, Assistant Mining Officer, Janjgir Champa and District Registrar, Janjgir Champa as members to inspect the properties and submit an independent report in regard to the valuation of the properties sought to be transferred.
It had its cement division in the State of Madhya Pradesh in the year 1982.
2 on 16.01.2001 by way of a certificate in terms of Section 32 of the Act whereupon the instrument was duly stamped.
1 in favour of the said Lafarge India Ltd. on 19.01.2001 which was registered on 21.01.2001.
33,75,601/ .
42,18,31,288/ .
The State appears to have filed a revision application before the Board of Revenue seeking revision of the order dated 16.01.2001 passed by Respondent No.
1 filed its objections in regard to the jurisdiction of the Board of Revenue to entertain the revisional application filed by the State.
It intended to sell the same in favour of one Lafarge India Ltd. on slump sale basis.
Appellant No.
Questioning the jurisdiction of the Board of Revenue to issue the aforementioned numberice, a writ petition was filed by the appellant, which by reason of the impugned judgment has been dismissed.
2451 of 2003.
Pursuant to or in furtherance of the said report, the stamp duty chargeable on the instrument under Section 31 of the Act was assessed by the Collector at Rs.
The said order was accepted by the appellants and the amount of stamp duty and the registration charges was deposited.
The State of Chhatisgarh was carved out of the State of Madhya Pradesh in November, 2000.
On or about 26.12.2001, however, the Board of Revenue served a numberice upon the appellants.
