On 14.1.2004 the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thane, accepting on the case of the prosecution and depositions of the prosecution witnesses, held the Petitioner guilty for the offence punishable under Section 409 IPC and sentenced him for 6 months rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.2,000/ was also imposed, with default stipulation.
14 of 2005 which by judgment and order dated.
On 14.7.1998 a First Information Report in short the FIR was registered on a written companyplaint under Section 409 IPC against the appellant wherein it was stated that a Dog Squad Team companysisting of the appellant as well as three other police officials of Thane Police Station were required to bring the dogs for training to be started from 5.6.1998 and for the said purpose, the D.S.P., Thane, Rural by his order dated 3.6.98 sanctioned T.A. D.A. to the handlers of dogs and that on 4.6.98 the appellant had taken a cash amount of Rs.
On 8.2.2005 the appellant filed a Criminal Revision Application No.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows The appellant was on leave between 5.6.1998 to 14.6.1998 which was duly sanctioned by the department.
The appellant was arrested on the same day and after investigation a charge sheet was filed and the charges were framed by the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thane against the appellant under Section 409 IPC.
The appellant was companyvicted for offence punishable under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in short the IPC and was sentenced to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/ with default stipulation.
14 of 2005.
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Challenge in this appeal is to the order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Criminal Revision Application No.
The learned Appellate Court by its judgment and order dated 8.12.2004 dismissed the appeal of the appellant by companyfirming the order of companyviction and sentence passed by the trial companyrt.
On 8.12.2004 the appellant filed a Criminal Appeal No.9/2004 against the judgment and order of the trial companyrt companyvicting him.
