Her appointment was purely on temporary basis for a period from 15th July, 1994 to 7th May, 1995 on the terms companyditions as laid down in Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Conditions of Service Regulation Act, 1977 and the Rules of 1981 framed thereunder.
She qualified her B.Ed examination and became a trained teacher on 19th September, 1997.
It was upheld by the High Court under the impugned judgment which is a subject matter before us.
The brief facts that culled out in a nut shell are that the appellant was appointed as Rest.
On the date of appointment, he was holder of the qualification of B.A., B.Ed.
At the same time, the impleaded 5th respondent was appointed as trained Assistant Teacher vide order of appointment dated 13th August, 1997.
Sindhutai Poreddiwar, Gogaon, Distt.
and at the time of entry into service, he was in category table C. At the same time, the appellant although was appointed as Assistant Teacher untrained with effect from 15 th July, 1994 but she qualified her B.Ed on 19 th September, 1997 and became member of category table C only on acquiring qualification of B.Ed.
untrained Teacher in High Signature Not Verified SUSHIL KUMAR RAKHEJA School, Smt.
and was a trained teacher under the Scheme of Rules, 1981.
Gadchiroli, Digitally signed by Date 2019.01.04 141135 IST Reason with effect from 15th July, 1994 vide order of appointment dated 27th June, 1994.
At one point of time, the appellant was placed senior to the 5 th respondent in the category of Assistant Teacher that gave a cause of grievance to the 5th respondent.
and accordingly the 5th Respondent became senior to the appellant in category C to Schedule F annexed to Rule 12 of Rules, 1981.
Rastogi, J. The dispute in this appeal pertains to the inter se seniority of the appellant visavis 5th respondent, who were appointed as Assistant Teacher in Secondary School and their services are governed by the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Conditions of Service Rules, 1981 hereinafter being referred to as Rules 1981 .
