The petition was transferred in 1991 to the Tribunal.
In the appointment letter it was mentioned that the appellant was appointed, on a purely temporary basis pending further orders as Lecturer in Dentistry at the BJ.
In March 1988 the post which was held by the appellant was advertisement through Public Service Commission.
Both these petitions have been decided by the Tribunal and the Claim of the appellant has been rejected as the benefit of resolution dated 19.9.1975 companyld number be extended to her.
The appellant filed a writ petition claiming that there was numbervacancy as she having rendered nine years of Service without break as a lecturer she stood regularised as per the Government Resolution dated 19.9,1975.
In August 1987 the Dean of the Medical College appears to have written some letter to the Government for placing the appellant on deputation for post graduation.
But admittedly she did number join.
Her claim was companytested by the State of various grounds including that the petition was pre mature.
Few dates and facts which are more or less undisputed may be narrated in brief.
The appellant, a Bachelor in Dental Surgery B.D.S. was selected by the Division Selection Board and was appointed as Lecturer in Dentistry in Government B J. Medical College, Pune on 16th September 1978.
The Govern ment did number agree to it, presumably, because the qualification for a lecturer in dentistry had been changed in the meantime in 1986.
IN 1980 and 1985 the appellant was selected by the Public Service Com mission for the post of Lecturer of Dental Mechanics and Period britia respectively.
