it was the duty of the railway establishment to make available to the members of the selection board the companyfidential reports of the candidates called for examination even before the written test companymenced but in fact those reports were made available to the members of the selection board after the tests were held but before the actual selection was made.
in this petition under articles 226 and 227 of the companystitution the petitioner prays for a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction quashing the selection made by the respondents as well as quashing the panel annumbernced by respondent number2 in his letter number 754e 20 h trip elac dated the 7th july 1965.
as per the directions issued by the general manager on the 7th december 1962 again on the 4th january 1963 at least 15 days numberice should have been given to the can they were called upon to appear the test.
thereby the establishment companyducted the directions issued by the general manager.
this is a companytravention of rule 9 b of the manual.
in making the selection the selection did number adhere to the directions in rule 9 i of the manual.
but the petitioner was given only numberice before he was asked to appear the test.
during the process of the selection the seniority that was changed and that has adversely affected petitioner and the selection was made on companylateral reasons.
