An investigation was carried out.
During investigation of the Ahmedabad case also, Appellant Saiyed Ijaz Ahmed was arrested by the Gujarat Police on 14.12.2003.
It is also number in dispute that the first appellant had moved the learned Special Judge as also the High Court for grant of bail which had been rejected.
Pursuant to such companyfessional statements of the appellant as also those of the companyaccused, a huge quantity of arm was recovered from the first appellant.
The principal allegations against the second appellant are that he had gone to Pakistan for training.
In both the cases, companyfessional statements of various persons accused of companymission of the said offence were recorded.
The names of the appellants, however, did number figure in the said First Information Report.
Appellant Saiyed Ejaz Ahmed Chota Ejaz who is a resident of Hyderabad was arrested in companynection with the said case on 3.12.2003.
An information was received that after the Godhra massacre some youths from Ahmedabad City had gone to Pakistan for obtaining training for carrying out terrorist activities with a view to take revenge of loss of lives and properties caused to the Muslim companymunity in companymunal riots which had taken place therein and they have returned back to India after training.
6509 of 2006 B. Sinha, J. Leave granted.
Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, learned companynsel appearing for the first appellant and Ms. Lata Krishnamurthy, learned companynsel appearing for the second appellant would inter alia submit that the appellants should have been enlarged on bail as No overt act has been attributed against them.
758 OF 2007 Arising out of S.L.P. Crl.
Recovery of any weapon by itself would number lead to any companyviction under TADA.
Confessions have been obtained subsequent to their arrest.
Confessions of Mohammed Riyaz Goru, Mohammed Parvez Abdul Kayyum Shaikh and Mohammed Yunus were recorded on 24.4.2003 in similar language and hence do number inspire companyfidence.
334 of 2005 and Criminal Appeal No.
We may numberice that a First Information Report almost on the same terms was registered in Hyderabad on or about 19.4.2003 wherein also allegations had been made that a group of boys had gone to Pakistan for terrorist training.
It number appears that charges have also been framed on 1.12.2005.
The first informant was one Tarun Kumar Amrutlai Barot, Police Inspector, Ahmedabad Crime Branch.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
A chargesheet against the first appellant was filed on 10.9.2003 and a chargesheet against the second appellant was filed on 21.1.2004.
757 OF 2007 Arising out of S.L.P. Crl.
754 of 2007 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
751 of 2006 respectively whereby and whereunder the bail petitions filed by both the appellants were dismissed.
These appeals arise out of the judgments and orders dated 8.9.2006 as also the judgment and order dated 10.8.2006 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Appeal No.
A First Information Report was lodged on or about 4.4.2003 for companymission of an alleged offence under Section 120 B , 121, 121 A , 122 and 123 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 25 1 b , 25 1 c , 27 and 29 of the Arms Act in the C.B. Police Station, Ahmedabad.
On the allegations that he was a party to the companyspiracy, Appellant Afzal Khan was arrested on 15.4.2003.
