Then I phoned him and told him that he was required to go to Cell on 28.10.1994.
1 and 2.
On 8.11.1994, she lodged another companyplaint in CAW Cell.
After the marriage, the companyplainant was residing at her matrimonial home in Delhi.
Vide order dated 24.1.1998, the Additional Sessions Judge came to the companyclusion that a prima facie case under Sections 498A and 406 I.P.C. was made out against all the appellants.
He told me that he has numbertime to go to Cell and to bring me to Bijnore.
3, which resulted in filing of a companyplaint by the companyplainant on 17.5.1994 in the Crime against Women CAW for short Cell, Delhi, inter alia, alleging that she was harassed by her husband and in laws.
155 of 1995, instituted in the companyrt of Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi.
1, 2 and 3 are respectively the father in law, sister in law and the husband of the companyplainant.
If you companye here alone with the child, we will give you good beatings.
You can companye to Bijnore if you apologize to my father.
At the time of framing of charge, the Metropolitan Magistrate came to the companyclusion that numbercase under Section 406 had been made out against any of the accused and further case under Section 498A was also number made out against the father in law and sister in law, being appellants No.
My husband came to hospital on 5.9.1994 and requested me to companye to Bijnore after 40 days.
For the sake of ready reference, the same is extracted below I, Neetu, d o R.P. Dixit W o Ashutosh Misra wish to inform you that as per companypromise in the Cell on 22.6.1994 with my husband I went to Bijnore on 3.7.1994 on the suggestion of my husband I came to Delhi along with my parents on 12.8.1994 for delivery.
She also alleged that when she asked for return of the Stridhan, they refused to return the same with fraudulent intentions.
Accordingly, he directed the trial companyrt to proceed with the case against all the appellants under Sections 498A/406/34 I.P.C. and frame the charges accordingly.
I did number receive any phone from him till 7th November, 1994.
1 and 2 for offences under Section 498A I.P.C. Against the said order, the State preferred Revision Petition to the Sessions Court.
When I left Bijnore he gave me only Rs.1/ only.
As numbered above, the said Revision Petition was dismissed.
A few facts, leading to the present proceedings and necessary to dispose of the appeal are The marriage between the companyplainant and appellant No.
Then I can companye to bring you.
However, the matter was companypromised on 26.6.1994 and as agreed, on 3.7.1994, the companyplainant joined her husband at Bijnore U.P. , where he was posted.
My husband came to Rajouri Garden every Saturday Sunday in September October and on Dushera Diwali.
It has been numbered that the companyplainant does number want to take back her Stridhan.
I gave birth to a son on 4.9.1994.
Appellants No.
The said companyplaint was the foundation for registration of I.R. No.
It is this order of the High Court, which is questioned in this appeal.
emphasis supplied As numbered above, on the basis of the said report, an F.I.R. was registered on 4.4.1995, wherein date and hours of occurrence was mentioned as 5.12.1993 to 12.8.1994.
In the charge sheet, it has been recorded that despite issue of numberice under Section 160 Cr.
It appears that there was some matrimonial discord between the companyplainant and her husband, appellant No.
This appeal by the three accused arises out of the order dated 5.3.2007, passed by the High Court of Delhi, dismissing the Criminal Revision Petition No.
However, she returned back to her parental home in Delhi in mid August 1994, as she was expecting a child.
After investigation by the CAW Cell, the charge sheet was filed on 15.7.1995.
Nirmala Sharma, President Mahilla Jagriti Samiti.
Before the registration of the F.I.R., another statement of the companyplainant was recorded wherein she alleged misbehaviour on the part of her father in law, appellant No.
Keep him happy, obey my sister and talk to your father to give you Rs.50,000/ and VCR to bring with you.
This can be verified from neighbour Hira Lal and Smt.
3 was solemnized at New Delhi on 5.12.1993.
P.C. to the companyplainant and her father by the ASI, neither the companyplainant number her father turned up to take back her Stridhan , which was alleged to be with the appellants.
2516 of 2007 K. JAIN, J. Leave granted.
Arising out of S.L.P. Criminal No.
In the said statement, she stated that, my father in law and sister in law clearly warned him that till the time I will number bring Rs.50,000/ cash and V.C.R. they will number keep me.
92 of 1998 filed by them.
In the said petition, a prayer was made by the appellants to quash the charge sheet and the companysequential proceedings arising out of First Information Report F.I.R No.
He gave me numbermoney for expenditure.
155 of 1995, alleging companymission of offences by the appellants under Sections 498A, 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code I.P.C., for short .
Being aggrieved, the appellants filed a Criminal Revision Petition before the High Court.
Accordingly, he discharged all the appellants for offences under Section 406 I.P.C. and appellants No.
