the respondents appeal to the additional district judge from the estate officers order was disallowed.
from the judgment and order dated the 8 4 1965 of the punjab high companyrt circuit bench delhi number the high companyrt of delhi in civil writ number 228 g of 1962 .
the estate officer who is the second respondent herein made an order on september 28 1961 under section 7 1 of the act asking the respondent to pay the sum overruling his objection that the claim was barred by limitation.
rupees thirty was the licencee fee payable per month by the allottees of these stalls.
one of the grounds of challenge was that section 7 companyld number be resorted to for recovery of the sum as the claim was time barred.
laxmi arvind mathur and s. khanduja for the respondents.
the high court accepted the companytention and allowed the petition.
the respondent number having paid the appellant asked the estate officer appointed under section 3 of the public premises eviction of unauthorised occupants act 1958 to take steps to recover the amount in arrears under section 7 of that act.
the respondent then filed a writ petition before the circuit bench of the punjab high companyrt at delhi challenging the order against him.
in the meantime many of the allottees fell in arrears in paying the licence fees.
it is number necessary to refer to the various proceedings arising from these applications for fixation of standard rent which were ultimately dismissed by the circuit bench of the punjab high court at delhi as number maintainable.
hardyal hardy b. p. maheshwari suresh sethi and bikaramjit nayar for the appellant.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 988 of 1968.
k. sen d. p. bhandare mrs.
in 1950 the appellant.
kalu ram who was also a displaced person was allotted one such stall on irwin road.
so far as the respondent is companycerned the appellant took no steps to recover the dues till december 1960 when it demanded the entire amount in arrears from may 1950 to april 1957.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by gupta j. respondent kalu ram was pavement vendor in connaught place new delhi.
later the allottees including the respondent applied to the rent controller for reducing the rent.
new delhi municipal companymittee provided a number of displaced persons with small pre fabricated stalls to enable them to do their business.
