The accused denied the accusations and were put on trial.
The companyviction and the companysequential sentences were challenged before the High Court which as numbered above dismissed the appeal.
Charges were framed against A1 under Section 147 IPC and against A2 to A6 under Section 148 IPC and that in companytinuance of the companymission of the said offence, A1 caught hold of the right hand of Sundaram and said cut and kill him and A4 inflicted cut on the right hand of Sundaram with the aruval and further A2 to A4 inflicted cuts on neck of Sundaram indiscriminately and hence Sundaram died and charges were framed against A1, A2 and A4 under Section 302 IPC and against A3, A5 and A6 under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC.
On perusal of the records and documents in the case and upon hearing the arguments of the Public Prosecutor and defence companynsel, trial companyrt came to hold that there was sufficient evidence to hold that the accused had companymitted the offences and the charges were framed.
Before the trial Court there were six accused persons.
When the witnesses Annakodi PW 1 , Ayyar PW 2 and Mokkai who saw the falling down of Sundaram, A3, A5 and A6 ran away and with the motive of companymitting the murder, threw the companyntry bombs on them and hence the witnesses Annakodi and Ayyar sustained injuries and charges were framed against A3, A5 and A6 under Section 307 IPC and against A1, A2 and A4 under Section 307 IPC read with Section 149 and during investigation it came to light that A3, A5 and A6 were in possession of companyntry bombs without any valid license and hence charges were framed against A3, A5 and A6 under Section 9 b 1 b of the Indian Explosives Act,1884 in short the Explosives Act .
Background facts as highlighted by the prosecution are as follows The Inspector of Police, Usilampatti filed the charge sheet against the accused stating that due to previous enmity A1 to A6 with companymon motive to companymit murder of Sundaram hereinafter referred to as deceased and the witnesses Annakodi PW 1 , Ayyar PW 2 and Mokkai, assembled unlawfully at about 10.45 a.m. on 11.10.89 in front of the tea shop of Raju Raja opposite to Malayandi Theatre Usilampatti on Madurai Usilampatti main road.
The above sentences shall run companycurrently.
5 and 6.
A2 to A6 were in possession of the dangerous weapon Aruval and A3, A5 and A6 were in possession of companyntry made bombs and companymitted companymotion along with A1.
5 and 6 before it and before the trial Court they were accused Nos.
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. In this appeal challenge is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Madras High Court dismissing the appeal filed by the appellants who were appellant number.
