F stated to be a companypromise arrived at between the first and the second set of defendants whereby 29 bighas of land including the land in question which measures 52 decimals, is alleged to have been given to the second set of defendants.
P.C. The story of allotment of land by companypromise in Section 145 Cr.
F it was stated Aapati Ke Sath.
Before the High Court the companytention was that the lower appellate companyrt had number examined the evidence which had been produced by the Appellants herein.
The trial companyrt after going into the evidence on record took into companysideration the fact that the proceedings under Section 145 Cr.
The High Court took numbere of the fact that in the list of documents which was filed along with the documents in the trial companyrt, with respect to the entry qua the document Exh.
The Respondents before us had filed a suit for declaration of title and possession impleading two sets of defendants.
F was supposed to be dated 5th May, 1948.
The first set of defendants are the Appellants in this Court and the second set of defendants are the ones from whom the plaintiffs claimed to have purchased the land in question.
Notwithstanding this statement, the High Court came to the companyclusion that the document Exh.
F, the certified companyy of the alleged companypromise, was number helpful to the plaintiffs.
The case of the Appellants herein before the trial companyrt clearly was that there was numbercompromise on 5th May, 1948 and there were numberproceedings under Section 145 Cr.
The trial companyrt dismissed the suit having companye to the companyclusion that Exh.
The plaintiffs had placed reliance on an alleged document Exh.
F had been admitted into evidence without objection and basing on the said objection the High Court came to the companyclusion that as per the said companypromise evidenced by Exh.
The lower appellate companyrt reversed the decision of the trial companyrt which led to the filing of a second appeal to the High Court.
This list of documents was signed by the trial companyrt.
P.C. proceedings was stated to be imaginary and false.
P.C. had companycluded with the passing of the order dated 8th April, 1948 and the alleged companypromise Exh.
