The new reliefs proceeded on the footing that there was a partnership of the theatre business in which the plaintiff had a share and the demand number made was to render an account of the cinema business M s. Prakash Talkies from March 1, 1973.
The claim was companytested by the appellant, issues were struck, two years passed, and then the respondent plaintiff work up to the need for an amendment for the plaint in the shape of additional reliefs and supportive averments.
Such metamorphosis under guise of amendment was, according to the appellant, impermissible.
