The trial companyrt found that the charge against the appellant for the offence under Section 135 1 of the Bombay Police Act was number made out and companysequently the appellant was acquitted of the said charge.
He found one police jeep on patrol From the Judgment and Order dated 31 12 1993 of the Additional Designated Court, Ahmedabad in Terrorist Crl.
The prosecution story, as emerging from the record is that a companyplaint was lodged by one Jugal Kishore Puran Lal Gupta complainant, with Gomtipur Police Station on 10 7 1992 alleging that when he was returning after visiting his brothers Video Cassette Library located near Vivekananda Mills on a bicycle, near Arbuda Mills, he found one unknown person companying towards him.
P 11 formulated the following three points for companysideration Does the prosecution prove that on 10 7 1992 at about 9.30 p.m. near Arbuda Mills situated within Gomtipur Police Station limits the present accused along with the absconding accused Saleem Ibrahim Shaikh voluntarily caused hurt on the companyplainant Jugal Kishore Puran Lal Gupta by means of any instrument for stabbing or cutting, or any instrument, which if used as a weapon of offence, is likely t cause death and has, thus rendered himself liable for the offence punishable under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code?
The injuries which were disclosed in the injury certificate Ex.
The companyplainant, however, managed to free himself and started running towards the four cross roads.
6 of 1993 duty and the police took him to the hospital.
P II , upon admission by the defence, indicated that the companyplainant sustained an injury of 10 cms x 0.75 cm x 0.75 cm on his abdomen apart from an injury on his back of the size 3 cms x 0.25 cm x 0.25 cm.
The trial companyrt after recording the evidence led by the prosecution and exhibiting the injury certificate received from the hospital, Ex.
The companyaccused of the appellant was released on bail during the investigation but at the time of framing of the charge sheet, the companyaccused did number turn up and even the sureties companyld number be located.
The assailant also inflicted a knife blow on his back.
On reaching near the companyplainant, that person took out a knife and gave him a blow on his abdomen.
This is an appeal under Section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act, 1987 hereinafter TADA .
A companyplaint was thereafter lodged and investigation taken in hand.
While being dragged towards the Chawl, he was given one more blow on the left side of his neck.
Two or three more persons came out from a nearby Chawl and asked the assailant to drag the companyplainant into the Chawl.
Case No.
