The subjects were General Medicine, General Surgery, Obstetrics Gynaecology and Paediatrics.
The private respondents students for short are prosecuting MBBS companyrse in different Medical Colleges affiliated to the University.
The appellant University referred as the University was established under the Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Act, 1998.
The description of appellant is permitted to be companyrected by showing the Deputy Registrar as representing the Appellant University, instead of the Deputy Registrar of the Appellant University being shown as the appellant.
They appeared for the III MBBS Part II examination companyducted by the University in December, 2005.
The results were published on 18.2.2006.
Regulation 12 4 when read in its numbermal and natural sense, does number companytemplate for clubbing of internal assessment with external examination.
The appeal relate to the interpretation of Regulation 12 2 4 of Regulations on Graduate Medical Education 1997 framed by Medical Council of India for short MCI Regulations .
The students were shown as having failed in one or more subjects and as a companysequence, as having failed in the examination.
Both the two companytentions were companysidered and rejected.
Feeling aggrieved, they filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court.
V. RAVEENDRAN J. The companymon judgment and order dated 23.6.2006 of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition L No.
887 of 2006 and companynected cases is under challenge in this appeal by special leave.
