In revision, the High Court has affirmed the said finding.
Amongst the opponent, 1st opponent and the mother are present.
This is an appeal arising out of judgment and order dated 26th June, 2000 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in L.R.R.P. No.2339/1990.
This appeal special leave petition was filed against the aforesaid order of the High Court in revision and has been heard by us in presence of the learned companynsel for the parties.
Area Revenue Mastur 69 9 21 20.68 Since the applicant has stated before the tribunal that he has given up the cultivation of the land the application of the Applicant is rejected.
Village Reg.
Matter was enquired and the statements were recorded.
The relevant records were perused.
companytd2/ The Opponent who were present have admitted the position.
About seven years thereafter, a writ petition was filed by him before the High Court challenging this order of the Land Tribunal Ranebennur.
The Applicant was earlier cultivating the land on Koru lavani and thereafter i.e. 4 to 5 years back the said land was given to the landlords.
An application was filed in the year 1977 by Hanumappa the predecessor in interest of the companytesting respondents, before the Land Tribunal Ranebennur for companyferment of occupancy rights, which was disposed of in the following manner Applicant present in Court.
