The facts to the extent relevant to dispose of this petition briefly stated are the following The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Secretary by the respondent No.
Since the Government did number act, the petitioner filed writ petition in the High Court of Calcutta.
The appeal filed by the respondents herein was dismissed by the Division Bench of the High Court.
Again, the petitioner moved the High Court against the said order of the State Government.
His services were terminated with effect from 27.11.1995.
1041 of 2000, which was dismissed by this Court on 26.7.2000.
Learned single Judge of the High Court made an order directing the State Government to make a reference as to whether the petitioner was a workman.
This Court, by an elaborate order dated 14.2.2000, numbericing the facts, companytentions of the parties and the decisions allowed the Civil Appeal No.
The Government companymunicated its decision regretting its inability to make a reference saying that the petitioner was number a workman.
Labour Commissioner submitted the failure report in companyciliation proceedings on 2.7.1997 recommending a reference, as according to him the question whether the petitioner was a workman required adjudication.
Now the petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking the relief as stated above.
1041 of 2000 and set aside the judgment of the High Court directing the State Government to make an appropriate reference.
The High Court directed the State Government to take decision under Section 12 5 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 within the time fixed.
1 herein brought the matter to this Court.
550 of 2000 in the said civil appeal No.
The respondent No.
The petitioner filed Review Petition No.
Shivaraj V. Patil, J. LITTTTTTTJ In this writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner has sought for setting aside the judgment and order dated 14.2.2000 passed by this Court in C.A. No.
An industrial dispute was raised by the petitioner.
1041 of 2000 Secretary, Indian Tea Association vs. Ajit Kumar Barat Ors.
1 on 16.9.1986 was promoted to the post of Joint Secretary on 1.4.1991 was transferred on 22.5.1995 to Dibrugarh, which order of transfer was also the subject matter of another litigation with which we are number companycerned in this petition.
