Board supported this stand.
These details and the records therefore do number appear to have been companysidered by the High Court.
It is to be numbered that the decision in Satpal Singhs case supra was rendered on 14.9.1993 whereas the criteria had only been framed on 19.5.1993.
The Board had revised the criteria to bring it within the framework of Satpal Singhs case supra and had accordingly reduced the marks for the interview from 85 to 25.
The list of the selected candidates was finalized and displayed from which it transpired that against the advertised posts 2395, candidates had been recommended by the Board for admission to the Patwar Training School.
It appears that so far as the marks obtained for handwriting are companycerned, in numbercase any selected candidate has secured more than 5 marks.
It was also pointed out that it is number a fact that nearly 500 candidates from Adampur and 300 candidates from Kalka had been selected, as only 350 candidates from district Hisar which included Adampur companystituency and 150 candidates from Ambala of which Kalka companystituency was a part amongst the first 1200 candidates and this was because of the large number of applications from that area i.e. about 19000 from Hisar and 6000 from Ambala district.
The number of candidates and the marks secured by them are as follows No.
The selection was impugned in the writ petitions on several grounds.
The criteria for selection as fixed by the Board was as follows Academic record 60 marks Sports curriculum 5 marks Handwriting 10 marks Interview 25 marks For the process of interview, seven different Committees were appointed which functioned between 20.5.1993 to February, 1994.
So far as the marks obtained by the selected candidates 2395 at the interview are companycerned, the details are as follows No.
It was also stated that the allegation about the then Chief Minister influencing the selection was unfounded.
The final result was declared and 2395 candidates were selected for appointment in terms of Haryana Revenue Patwaris Group C Service Rules, 1981.
4565 /07 SLP C 18769/2005, Civil Appeal No.
4562 OF 2007 Arising out of SLP C No.18772 of 2005 WITH Civil Appeal No.
Pursuant to the directions, the marks secured at the interview and in the handwriting by the selected candidates were filed.
of Candidates Marks obtained 8 1 258 2 508 3 300 4 55 5 Learned companynsel for the Board stated that records of 119 candidates were number available.
It was pointed out that the selection beyond the advertised posts was bad in law, the marks for performance in the interview were to be restricted to 15 whereas in the present case 25 marks were allotted for the interview and 10 marks were given for handwriting.
Appellants had applied for the said posts.
Further, the distinguishing features numbered by this Court vis vis those in Satpal Singhs case supra were also number numbericed.
4564 /07 SLP C 18765/2005, Civil Appeal No.
4566 /07 SLP C 18261/2005, Civil Appeal No.
4567 /07 SLP C 18771/2005, Civil Appeal No.
4568 /07 SLP C 18766/2005, Civil Appeal No.
4569 /07 SLP C 18770/2005, Civil Appeal No.
4570 /07 SLP C 18373/2005, Civil Appeal No.
4571 /07 SLP C 18767/2005, Civil Appeal No.
4572 /07 SLP C 20014/2005, Civil Appeal No.
/07 SLP C 18768/2005, Civil Appeal No.
4573 /07 SLP C 8270/2006.
It vacant every year and the advertisement was issued in the year 1992.
A separate reply was filed by the Chief Minister who stated that his speech was being read out of companytext.
of Candidates Marks Obtained 5 10 7 11 15 12 11 13 22 14 38 15 129 16 306 17 381 18 475 19 410 20 239 21 100 22 31 23 6 24 1 25 It is stated that the records of 219 candidates were number available.
CIVIL APPEAL NO.
One of the writ petitioners filed an application to the Board asking for the supply of details of the performance of the selected candidates, but those were number given.
About 1.10 lakhs candidates were interviewed who were short listed from amongst 1.25 lakhs candidates.
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Challenge in these appeals is to the judgment of Punjab and Haryana High Court allowing the Civil Writ Petitions filed by number official respondents.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows The Subordinate Services Selection Board hereinafter referred to as the Board issued an advertisement dated 7.11.1992 calling for applications for filling up 1248 posts of Patwar candidates to be deputed to the Patwar Training School and on companypletion of training, for appointment as Patwaris.
Learned companynsel for the State supported the judgment of the High Court and learned companynsel for the respondents writ petitioners on the other hand submitted that the High Court was justified in its view.
