2 was an account clerk usually stationed at Chikhli while the appellant, being the Manager, used to lock after the work of both the head office and the branch office, the distance between the two being about 15 miles.
These two amounts, tied in two separate bundles, were taken by him to Chikhli and he handed over the two bundles to Haribhan Mahajan who was working as an accountant at the head office.
In the daily cash book maintained at Buldana, debit entries used to be made showing the amount despatched to the head office and mentioning the name of the person through whom the amount was sent.
1 was working as an accounts clerk at the Buldana branch, accused No.
The learned Sessions Judge, Buldana, in appeal, acquitted accused No.
That order having been companyfirmed by the High Court, Bombay, Nagpur Bench, accused No.
The Samiti used to receive large amounts in its Buldana branch office and those amounts used to be carried to the head office by some employee or the other.
The Samiti has its head office at Chikhli and a branch office at Buldana.
3 has brought this appeal by special leave.
1 but maintained the companyviction and sentence of the appellant and of accused No.
7,000/ was given to him on the afternoon of November 10, 1965 and that a further sum of Rs.
Thus, according to the appellant he was only paid a total sum of Rs.
2,500/ was given to him the same evening.
In the vague state of the record it seems to us impossible to dismiss the explanation of the appellant as unreasonable.
9,500/ and number two separate sums, one of Rs.
The defence of the appellant is that a sum of Rs.
7,000/ and the other of Rs.
9,500/ .
