Thereafter numberody had seen the deceased alive.
On 20 2 1988 she was decoyed by her husband to a village called Khabra, and there she was strangulated to death and the dead body was abandoned in a sugarcane grove and the husband escaped therefrom.
PW 10 was led by him to the sugarcane field wherefrom the putrefied dead body was recovered.
She was taken back to her natal home, and after a reconciliation settled at by the intervention of some well meaning relatives, she was brought back to the nuptial home sometime during February, 1988.
The prosecution case is that deceased Narinder Kaur and respondent accused were married together somewhere in 1985 86 and the married life was number happy as skirmishes erupted frequently as between them.
The post mortem examination companyducted on 25 2 1988 revealed that death of Narinder Kaur would have occurred within five days prior to the autopsy.
Pursuant to the said statement police party was led by the accused to village Khabra and respondent pointed out the dead body of Narinder Kaur lying inside a sugarcane grove.
The following circumstances were arrayed by the prosecution to bring the guilt of the respondent home.
It was found to be a case of murder by strangulation.
He told the police of the place where the dead body was abandoned.
Her husband, the respondent, was indicted for the murder of the deceased.
The brother of the deceased moved the High Court in revision as the State did number bother to file any appeal against the acquittal.
Both of them were found riding on a bicycle on 20 2 1988 near the village Moila and accused told PW 4 that they were proceeding to Akal Garh Gurudwara which is said to be about 1 kilometre from that place where PW 4 saw the spouses.
During the investigation the police arrested the respondent on the next day.
The case against the husband sprang up on the lodgment of an FIR made by the present appellant on 24th February, 1988.
But the revision was disposed of by the High Court through cryptic order No ground to interfere.
The trial Court acquitted him.
This case relates to the death of a lady by name Narinder Kaur.
The aggrieved appellant has filed this appeal by special leave.
On 25 2 1988 respondent disclosed to PW 10 that the dead body of Narinder Kaur companyld be pointed out by him.
That Narinder Kaur and respondent were living together in his house after a reconciliation was struck at the intervention of their relatives.
Respondent was sent up for trial after companypleting the investigation and the trial ended in his acquittal as mentioned above.
Exhibit P.G. is the recovery memo drawn up thereat.
