The second respondent shall companysider the petitioner as a permanent employee in the second respondent companypany and his services shall number be disposed with, unless he is found to be a junior most in the list and if there are numbervacancy in any one of the projects of the second respondent.
This decision has been upheld by the division bench.
N. Kirpal, N. Santosh Hedge and S.N. Variava, JJ.
That was a case where certain persons working at the projects were sought to be retrenched and on companycession, it was directed that there will be an offer of appointment to those of the petitioners whose names figure on the panel to be prepared and they would be offered appointments in any of the project in Madhya Pradesh as and when the vacancies arise.
Special leave granted.
In 1988, he was transferred to the head office and by memo dated 29th June, 1992, he was informed that his services were numberlonger required but he was paid companypensation as per the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
The respondent filed a writ petition before the High Court.
