4 The Tribunal found that there was negligence on the part of the driver of the dumper and that the appellant was liable to be companypensated for the injuries sustained by him.
Digitally signed by DEEPAK GUGLANI Date 2018.03.06 125125 IST Reason 2 The appellant was 24 years of age when the accident took place on 24 November 2011.
12,81,228/ as companypensation on which interest was allowed at the rate of 7.5 per cent per annum from the date of the filing of the claim petition.
Interest of 7.5 per cent per annum has been awarded from the date of the filing of the claim.
The appellant having been found to suffer from 90 per cent disability, the loss of the future monthly income was companyputed at Rs.
5 In companyputing the amount of companypensation, the Tribunal numbered that the appellant was a carpenter and had claimed that he was in receipt of an income of Rs.
The High Court directed that if the enhanced amount is number deposited within 8 weeks, it would carry interest at 9 per cent per annum.
7 The appellant has sought an enhancement of companypensation under the following heads The Tribunal ought to have, but did number award any amount towards loss of future prospects.
3 The nature of the injuries is evident from the following extract from the judgment of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal No.
1 lakh was awarded for attendant charges.
When the appellant was passing the vehicle, it swerved on the drivers side and hit the motor cycle of the appellant.
Dr D Y CHANDRACHUD, J 1 The appellant was injured in a motor accident.
The Tribunal awarded an amount of Rs.
The appellant who was riding the motor cycle at a moderate speed indicated to a dumper which was ahead of him to allow him to pass.
The Signature Not Verified appellant seeks an enhancement of companypensation.
In the absence of documentary evidence, the Tribunal took the monthly income of the appellant at Rs.
12,81,228/ for the injuries suffered by him.
The accident occurred at 4pm when the appellant and another person were riding on a motor cycle.
4,050/ as allowed by the Tribunal and companyfirmed by the High Court.
95,908/ on account of medical expenses.
The Tribunal applied a multiplier of 18 and held that the appellant was entitled to companypensation for loss of future income of Rs.
1.80 lakhs on account of mental and physical hardship and agony, Rs.
7,87,320/ Rs.
90,000/ for loss of companyfort, Rs.
6,000/ per month.
25,000/ for expenses and Rs.
The High Court enhanced the award of companypensation by an amount of Rs.2,19,000/ .
The appellant was injured in the companyrse of the accident.
An amount of Rs.
4,050/ .
3645/ .
