He was held disentitled to back wages since those were number capable of a precise companyputation and involved an element of speculation.
As stipulated, Sahus services were terminable at any time.
2 per appraisal.
From the Judgment and Order dated 14.3.1991 of the Orissa High Court in OJC No.
The Labour Court went into the matter and vide Award dated March 27, 1985, set aside the order of termination terming it as illegal and unjustified, ordering Sahus reinstatement in service.
The appellant Bank as well as Sahu approached the High Court of Orissa challenging companyrespondingly the Award of the Labour Court insofar as it had gone against their respective interests.
He successfully sought a reference from the Government to the Labour Court.
1483 of 1985.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by PUNCHHI, J. In this matter challenge has been made to the judg ment and order dated 14.3.1991 of the Orissa High Court passed in OJC No.
1483 of 1985.
Notice was issued to Madhusudan Sahu, respondent, the person companycerned, indicating that the matter shall be disposed of at the numberice stage.
His services were terminated by the Bank on 27.8.1979.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
Narasing Murthy, Kirti Mishra and Sanjib Das for the Appellant.
Besides the said companymission wages the appraiser companyld claim numberother sum for his services.
1813 of 1992.
