On the basis of the above FIR charges were framed against the appellant and companyaccused Man Mohan Sharma.
As per the amicable settlement a sum of Rs.
Vijay Lakshmi Finance, Real Auto Deals and Man Mohan Sharma, have sold my vehicle to some other place by making my forged signatures and by playing fraud with me, in companynivance of each other.
In that writ petition an affidavit was filed by the companyplainant stating that in view of the settlement between the parties he is withdrawing the allegations against both the writ petitioners and he is also withdrawing the FIR.
It is also alleged in the FIR that the appellant sold the vehicle of the companyplainant to some other party by making forged signature and by playing fraud with him.
The appellant filed a writ petition before the High Court for quashing the FIR on the ground that the matter had been companypromised between the companyplainant and the accused.
3954/ as first installment.
A 25, Jhilmil Colony, Vivek Vihar, Delhi, stated that I reside at the above mentioned address with my family.
The receipts issued to me put up with neither rubber stamp number used the letter head of Real Auto Deals.
The cheques received from me, encashed him in different different names instead depositing in the account of Real Auto Deals.
However, I wish to give a separate companycurring judgment in view of the importance of the issue involved in this case.
He asked me to give return the first R.C. He gave me the new R.C I returned him the old R.C. He suggested me that number the financer of your vehicle is Real Auto Deals.
A perusal of the FIR shows that the allegations against the appellant were that he forged documents in respect of a vehicle and thereafter indulged in cheating and deposited the cheques received from the companyplainant against financing of the vehicle in different accounts.
Statement heard which is companyrect.
J. ALTAMAS KABIR New Delhi DatedOctober 16, 2008 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.OF 2008 Special Leave Petition Criminal No.
I have received the payment given by you and your file.
Sd English.
Man Mohan Sharma used to receive the installments in cash every month from me.
P.C. or Article 226 of the Constitution when the accused and the companyplainant have companypromised and settled the matter between themselves.
The question involved in this case is whether an FIR under Section 420/468/471/34/120 B IPC can be quashed under Section 482 Cr.
The appropriate legal action may kindly be taken against all these persons.
However, the Delhi High Court by the impugned judgment dated 17.8.2007 rejected the writ petition and hence this appeal.
Sanjay Pal 31.1.97 Attested Sd Snglish Satya Narayan ASI 31.1.97.
45,000/ would be paid to the companyaccused Man Mohan Sharma.
The objection taken in the said case has also been raised by Mr. B.B. Singh, learned advocate for the respondent State.
ALTAMAS KABIR,J. Leave granted.
45,000/ would be paid to the appellant Manoj Sharma and a further sum of Rs.
Thereafter, on 27.12.1995 at about 10 Oclock he came to me in Jhilmil along with an unknown person, I can recognize him if he companyes to me, took my said Maruti Van with his help without my companysent by showing me a paper duly stamped by the police.
Kabir, J. and I respectfully agree with his companyclusion that the appeal should be allowed and the judgment of the High Court as well as the criminal proceedings pending before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Karkardooma Court, Delhi in FIR No.
After that Shri Man Mohan Sharma R o D 131, Jhilmil Colony, came and told me that your finance is fabricated one, that is why your vehicle has number been financed by me from Real Auto Deals which is run by my brother in law.
50 of 1997 dated 31st January, 1997 P.O. Vivek Vihar East Delhi against the appellant should be quashed.
I was shocked that how the vehicle got transferred without signing any form and paper.
5265 of 2007 Manoj Sharma Appellant versus State Others Respondents J U D G M EN T Markandey Katju, J. I have read the judgment of my learned brother Hon.
The allegations in the FIR are as follows Statement of Sanjay Pal S o Mahendra singh Pal R o House No.
