The appeal of accused number.1 and 5 was partly allowed.
On companypletion of investigation, a chargesheet came to be filed against 15 accused because the remaining two accused A16 and A17 were absconding for some time.
118/1992, trial was companyducted against 15 accused.
It appears from the judgment of the High Court information about the incident was companyveyed by wireless message by PSO of Amreli Rural Police Station to PSI, Mr. NG Rajput.
All the companyvicted accused preferred appeal No.
The trial insofar as the two absconding accused was segregated from the trial of the remaining even after they were apprehended and they were put to trial separately in Sessions Case No.
Some of the accused have even died.
The State of Gujarat filed Criminal Appeal No.167/1996 challenging the acquittal of the remaining thirteen accused.
The State appeals challenging acquittals of various accused were dismissed along with the revision filed by the de facto companyplainant.
On the basis of the said information, PSI, Rajput had gone to village Nana Ankadia and found three dead bodies lying near the shop of Bhikabhai and after getting some further information, he had gone to Amreli Hospital and recorded Signature Not Verified companyplaint from Vinu Ranchhod, which was registered at about Digitally signed by SUSHIL KUMAR RAKHEJA 1.30 a.m. on 12.07.1992.
All the appeals and the revision were clubbed together and disposed of by the High Court by a companymon judgment dated 1 2.2, Judgment of the High Court.
The accused No.
Admittedly all the companyvicts have by number served out their sentences.
Hence, these appeals, by the State and the de facto companyplainant.
The State of Gujarat filed Criminal Appeal No.1226/2003 against the acquittal of accused number.16 and 17.
The two absconding accused number.16 and 17 were tried separately for the offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 120B, 302 and 307 read with section 149 of IPC and under Section 25 1 A of the Arms Act and under Section 135 of Bombay Police Act in Sessions Case No.58/98.1 They were found number guilty by the Fast Track Court, Amreli by judgment dated 19.07.2003.
An examination of the record in these appeals left us in distress.
10 and 12 respectively Nanjibhai Khodabhai and Ratilal Nagji, and therefore the accused No.
On the basis of the said companyplaint, Date 2018.05.16 142402 IST Reason PSI, Rajput started investigation by recording statements, drawing panchnamas and sending the dead bodies for post mortem etc.
Chelameswar, J. On 11.07.1992, at about 10.10 pm, an incident occurred in the village of Nana Ankadia leaving 3 persons dead and 5 persons injured.
The matter was companymitted to the Sessions Court of Amreli as offences were exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions.
