In the proceedings before the Additional Presiding Officer, Labour Court No.1, Gwalior, in Case NO.107/M.P.I.R/98, the appellants State, who were shown as respondents, had appeared and filed their objection statement.
In the said circumstance, the appellants State herein was before the Division Bench of the High Court in W.P.NO.4225/2005.
Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by MAHABIR SINGH 2 Date 2019.10.01 182754 IST We have heard Mrs. Pragati Neekhra, learned Additional Reason Advocate General appearing for the appellants State and Mr. Tapesh Kumar Singh, learned companynsel appearing for the respondent and also perused the impugned order and the materials on record.
It was companytended therein that the respondent herein was appointed on 05.06.1992 for the work of Hindi Typist on daily wages.
While adverting to the legal companytentions, the factual aspects relating to the case were taken numbere.
It was companytended that the said appointment was number against a clear vacancy and, therefore, the claim as put forth by the respondent before the Labour Court is number justified.
S. BOPANNA,J. The appellants State of Madhya Pradesh is before this Court assailing Order dated 16.02.2010 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior in Writ Petition NO.4225/2005.
Through the said order the Division Bench of the High Court has approved the Award dated 10.03.2000 passed by the Additional Presiding Officer, Labour Court No.1, Gwalior, in Case NO.107/M.P.I.R/98 by dismissing the appeal filed by the appellants State and upholding the order passed by the learned Appellate Judge as well.
