By a companypromise in a civil suit between the heirs of Laxman Chandba Raut and Tanu Daulat Gavade Sakaram, the heir of Laxman Raut got 3/5ths share and Tanu Daulat got 2/5ths share in these occupancy rights.
Dattatraya Bhikaji Khot Kulkarni, a paternal uncle of respondent number 1, purchased.
On Kulkarnis death, respondent number 1 became the owner of the property.
2 to 4 are the tenants of respondent number 1.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and decree dated August 5, 1953, of the Bombay High Court in Appeal from the Appellate Decree No.
the shares of these persons by the sale deeds dated December 14,1903, and February 13, 1904.
Sitabai was the widow of Vishram Anna Shirsat, who succeeded Ram Raghu Shirsat, the occupancy tenant of the land in suit.
90 of 1956.
Ram Raghu Shirsat sold the occupancy rights in the land in suit to Laxman Chandba Raut by a deed dated March 8, 1892.
The land in suit is khoti land as defined in el.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
He claimed title to the property on the basis of the sale of occupancy rights under the sale deed executed in his favour by Sitabai on February 10, 1945.
S. K. Sastri, for the appellant.
915 of 1951.
The plaintiff sued for a declaration that the property in suit which is situate at Mouje Digvale, a village held by khots in the district of Ratnagiri, was owned by him, was under his management and that the defendants had numberright or interest therein.
G. Ratnaparkhi, for respondent No.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J. This appeal, by special leave, is against the judgment and decree of the High Court of Bombay, dismissing the suit of the plaintiff appellant.
April 12.
