CGIT LC/101/2005 by the Central Government for deciding the legality of the termination order of the respondent.
3067 of 2015 whereby the High Court dismissed the petition filed by the appellant herein.
Heard Mr. Gurukrishan Kumar, learned senior companynsel for the appellant and Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar, learned companynsel for the respondent.
Having heard the learned companynsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, we are inclined to allow the appeal and modify the impugned order to the extent indicated below.
The appeal involves a short point as is clear from the facts stated hereinbelow.
By impugned order, the High Court Single Judge dismissed the appellants writ petition and affirmed the award of the Industrial Tribunal which gives rise to filing of the present appeal by way of special leave in this Court by the appellant LIC .
By award dated 11.02.2014, the Tribunal answered the reference partly in favour of the respondent.
1000/ p.m. in the year 1994.
The appellant LIC felt aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal and filed a writ petition in the High Court of MP at Jabalpur.
The Tribunal set aside the termination order of the respondent and directed the appellant to reinstate him in their services but without payment of any back wages to him.
8 of the Regulations framed under the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956, which empowers the officers specified therein to appoint any person of Class III and IV category on temporary basis from time to time.
The services of the respondent were brought to an end in the year 2001 by the appellant LIC which gave rise to making a reference to the Industrial Tribunal CGIT , Jabalpur being No.
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Leave granted.
The respondent was appointed as a Caretaker on temporary basis by the appellant LIC on a fixed salary of Rs.
This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 10.03.2017 of the High Court of Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA Date 2019.03.26 175349 IST Reason Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Writ Petition No.
The respondents job was to act as a Caretaker of one VIP Guesthouse of the appellant at Bhopal.
The appointment of respondent was made under Regulation No.
