On October 28, 1973 objections were filed.
The appellant questioned its legality under Article 226 in the High Court.
Therefore, they are disposed of together.
Similar numberifications at different places were also subject matters of writ petitions raising diverse companytentions.
The High Court had number adequately dealt with the point.
Appeal under Section 32 2 filed before the Government too was rejected on July 14, 1978.
On its receipt the Board issued numberices on February 1, 1979 under Section 9 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 for short, L.A. Act to take possession of the lands on expiry of 15 days thereafter.
The companytention of the respondents is that by operation of Section 55 and the schedule appended to the Act the legislature incorporated Sections 4 i and 6 i L.A. Act with modification existing as on the date the Act had companye into force.
The Committee companystituted in that behalf after hearing the objections, companysideration thereof and rejection by proceedings dated November 1, 1976, recommended to the Government to approve the scheme.
The Government on June 25, 1977 approved it to the extent of 11 acres 27 cents and the numberification was published on August 27, 1977 in the Gazette as required under Section 32 1 .
37 of 1987, dated August 9, 1988 7 1991 4 SCC 368 inapplicable.
The Judgments of the Court were delivered by RAMASWAMY, J. Special leave granted.
The subsequent amendments to the L.A. Act are 4 Writ Petition No.
1247 of 1976, dated February 13, 1981 5 AIR 1984 All 234 1984 AWC 493 1984 All CJ 489 FB 6 Writ Petition No.
1 Scheme for Rampur city to relieve the acute housing problems of that city and published the impugned numberification in the Gazette on September 8, 15 and 22 of 1973 under Section 28 1 of the Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965 Act 1 of 1966 amended as on that date, for short the Act proposing to acquire 14 acres of land situated in civil area at an estimated companyt of Rs 25.21 lakhs.
Notices under Section 29 inviting objections were served on the appellants and others on September 20, 1973.
On July 31, 1976 numberice was given of hearing objections on August 28, 1976.
As the facts in C.A. No.
These 41 appeals and writ petitions raise a companymon question of law for decision.
965 of 1981 are sufficient to companysider the companytroversy raised, the need to reiterate the facts in each case became redundant.
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad, Lucknow, the second respondent framed Bhumi Vikas Evam Grahastham Yojana No.
Local publications too were made.
