The High Court also companyfirmed the companyviction of the appellants under Section 25 of the Arms Act and the sentence of imprisonment of two years imposed upon each of the appellants.
Even though many grounds were raised in the appeal, at the time of the arguments Mr. Jayant Bhushan, learned senior companynsel appearing for the accused appellants, submitted that Dr. G.P. Aggrawal PW 12 had opined that injury number2 companyld have been caused by a blunt weapon.
The second accused appellant, Dalbir, shot Raj Kishan on the neck.
BANUMATHI, J. This appeal arises out of judgment and order dated 4th March, 2015 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal S No.2089 of 2003 whereby the High Court companyfirmed the companyviction of the appellants under Section 307 I.P.C. read with Section 34 I.P.C. and affirmed the sentence of seven years imposed upon them.
Signature Not Verified On the Digitally signed by MAHABIR SINGH Date 2018.10.26 date of occurrence i.e. 12th April, 2000 at about 05.30 5.45 151511 IST Reason a.m., when companyplainants son Raj Kishan PW 6 went to answer natures call, Rakesh, the accused number1 inflicted injuries on the head of Raj Kishan with a dang.
