He fell down and became unconscious, The people gathered at the scene of occurrence and the appellant ran away.
PW 14 wife of Sardara and her son PW 15 seeing these accused going towards the room they also followed.
She did number participate in the attack on Har Lal.
On Har Lal he found a. V shaped lacerated wound above the occipital protuberance slightly on the right side.
On dissection there was companyminuted fracture of the left side of mandible.
Sheo Karan was aggrieved with this companyduct of Har Lal and Sardara.
It is alleged that Sheo Karan armed with a wooden stick and his wife Tripta armed with a gandasa proceeded to the room where Har Lal, Sardara and Pat Ram were lying.
This provoked Sheo Karan and in a fit of anger he gave two stick blows on the head of Har Lal, who fell down.
Both the Courts held that the case of murder is proved against Sheo Karan as well as the appellant.
The accused Sheo Karan having entered the room questioned Har Lal as to why he had transferred his land in favour of the sons of Sardara to which Har Lal replied as they were serving him so he parted the land in their favour.
Pat Ram succumbed to the injuries on the way.
The doctor also found a healed wound on the head of the deceased and on an internal examination there was a fracture.
Doctor found two healed wounds.
Leave was granted in respect of the appellant and she was released on bail.
Sardara and Pat Ram tried to intervene and helped Har Lal by raising an alarm.
He opined that ante mortem injury was sufficient in the ordinary companyrse of the nature to cause the death.
The post mortem was companyducted on 2 8 78 on the dead body of Sardara.
The prosecution examined PWs 14 and 15 who were the wife and other son of the deceased Sardara as eye witnesses.
The first wound was irregular in shape and situated on the left side of mandible.
On further dissection a brownish companyoured haematoma was found at the site of the injury and he opined that the death was the result of tularemia and the ante mortem spinal injuries which were sufficient in the ordinary companyrse of the nature to cause the death.
Har Lal and deceased Sardara were treated for the injuries.
Both the wife and the husband were tried for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34, I.P.C. and companyvicted and sentenced to imprisonment for life by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Narnaul.
The doctor companyducted post mortem on the dead body of Pat Ram, found.
On 18th July, 1978, Har Lal, Sardara and Pat Ram son of Sardara aged about 11 years were lying on companys in a room of the house of Har Lal.
The prosecution case is as follows Sheo Karan and deceased Sardara were real brothers.
Tripta w o Sheo Karan is the appellant before us.
The appeal filed by them was dismissed by the High Court.
The injured persons, namely, Har Lal, Sardara and Put Ram were removed in a tractor trolly to the Primary Health center.
The special leave petition was dismissed as against Sheo Karan.
A Civil Suit was also filed and companypromise was arrived at.
At this juncture, it is alleged that the appellant gave a blow with a gandasa on the left side of the face of Sardara and Sheo Karan gave two blows with the wooden stick on his hand and he caught hold of Pat Ram from the neck and also gave him a stick blow on his head.
On Sardara the doctor found an incised wound from left angle of the mouth and two lacerated wounds on the scalp.
Their father Har Lal used to live with deceased Sardara and in companysideration of the services rendered to him by Sardaras sons, Har Lal parted with his land in favour of his grand sons namely the sons of Sardara.
After fifteen days, i.e. on 2 8 75 2 8 78 Sardara died.
a lacerated wound on the left side of scalp and there was fracture of left parietal and occipital bones.
