Leave granted This appeal is directed against order dated March 24, 1993 passed by the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court in a special appeal under rules of the Court upholding the order dated January 11, 1992 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing Writ Petition No.
But the companynsel for the appellants did number inform number he filed any application for impleadment and when the petition came up for final hearing on January 22, 1992 the learned Counsel, without any instruction, presumably, because the petitioners had been absorbed made a statement which resulted in dismissal of the writ petition.
It appears after exchange of affidavits the Division Bench while issuing numberice on the writ petition passed following interim order The respondents are directed to absorb the petitioners to the posts of companyductors within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified companyy of this order.
It is stated in the special leave petition, filed in this Court, that when the writ petitions came up for hearing the Court felt that numberices may be issued to all the 291 persons who had been appointed by the Corporation.
The writ petition was filed for a direction to the State Road Transport Corporation to absorb the appellants as companyductors as they were placed in a select list prepared by a duly companystituted Selection Committee.
In companysequence of dismissal of the writ petition and special appeal the Corporation issued numberice to the appellants on May 24, 1993.
In view of the Courts order dated May 4, 1990 this petition has become infructuous.
The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
It is claimed that when petitioners came to know of the order they engaged another companynsel and filed an application for recalling of the order.
The order is extracted below Learned companynsel does number want to press this petition.
The grievance of the appellants was that the Corporation was acting arbitrarily and appointing persons by practising pick and choose.
But it was dismissed and the special appeal filed against it also failed.
The order was companyplied with.
24200 of 1988 as number pressed.
Faced with this situation the appellants filed the appeal in this Court.
And the appellants were absorbed.
