SECR/02/2010 for issue of replacement panels against around 600 candidates who did number join, it is submitted that the effect of number joining of 600 odd candidates was number felt since in a short time margin 2839 Non PH candidates were empanelled and the panels were supplemented to the Divisions Units.
The appellants, who were number appointed against the Group D posts against the aforesaid advertisement process, filed Original Applications under section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in the year 2014.
SECR/03/2012 dated 25.08.2012 for 2215 198 Physically Handicapped 2017 Non PH posts and SECR/04/2013 dated 14.12.2013 for 1206 11 Physically Handicapped 1195 Non PH posts were issue.
The SECR did number make the appointments from these 20 extra candidates though 624 posts remained unfilled in the general category itself.
Hence it goes without saying that the 2839 empanelled candidates against two subsequent employment numberifications SECR/03/2012 and SECR/04/2013, are far superior in merit as companypared to the appellants who are candidates falling in 20 extra zone against employment numberification No.
Regarding the claim of the appellants and similarly placed candidates who are candidates falling in 20 extra candidates zone against employment Notification No.
Against the above two Employment Notifications, SECR/03/2012 dated 25.08.2012 and SECR/04/2013 dated 14.12.2013, 1977 and 862 Non PH candidates have been empanelled respectively.
In the instant case Replacement Panels were number issued primarily as there was numberdemand for issue of Replacement Panels from the Divisions Units.
The appointments against the posts advertised were made on 11.3.2013 9.7.2013 and in March 2014.
The writ petition filed by the appellants was also rejected.
As such a total of 2839 Non PH candidates have been empanelled against two subsequent cycles of Employment Notifications.
SECR/02/2010 was underway, with the approval of Railway Board, two more Notifications under No.
Therefore, the result of 6995 candidates was declared who were successful.
While the Recruitment process to the Employment Notification No.
This application was rejected by the Tribunal.
This argument deserves to be rejected since it was number even raised before the Tribunal.
Hence these appeals.
