Nawab Mohammad Ali Khan Qazilbash also died and five persons amongst whom was one Nawab Ali Raza Khan were impleaded as legal representatives in the execution proceedings.
On September 27, 1960 the appellant applied to the Custodian for an order under s. 10 2 n of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950, directing that his claim for Rs.
By order dated February 22, 1960 the High Court held that after the Custodian entered upon the management of the properties of the evacuee by virtue of S. 17 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, so long as the property remained vested in the Custodian under the provisions of that Act it was number liable to be proceeded against in any manner whatsoever in execution of any decree or order of any companyrt or other authority.
Rani Manraj Koer died on October 1, 1941 and the appellant was brought on the record as her heir and legal representative.
In exercise of his revisional jurisdiction, the Custodian General Evacuee Property, New Delhi, companyfirmed the order, and the appellant has, with special leave, appealed against that order.
Against the order passed by the Civil Judge, Lucknow appeals were preferred by the appellant to the High Court at Allahabad.
1,27,638/2/under the two decrees in suits Nos.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated January 22, 1962, of the Deputy Custodian General of India, New Delhi No.
The Civil Judge, Lucknow, by order dated July 22, 1950 directed that the transfer certificates issued in the two decrees be recalled and the papers be companysigned to the record.
The Custodian of Evacuee Property took possession of the estate of the evacuee and applied to the Civil Judge, Lucknow for removal of attachment levied on the estate by the Civil Judge, Bahraich in execution of the decrees at the instance of the appellant.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
124 of 1963.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Shah, J Rani Manraj Koer obtained money decrees in two suits Nos.
472/R UP/1961.
Gopal Singh and R. N. Sachthey, for the respondent.
S. Shukla, for the appellant.
9 of 1932 and 42 of 1932 filed by her in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Lucknow against Nawab Mohammad Ali Khan Qazilbash Zamindar, Aliabad Estate, in Uttar Pradesh.
From time to time execution applications were filed by the decree holder against the Zamindar, but numberhing was recovered.
