But inspite of these circumstances which were number companysidered to be companyclusively companynecting the appellant with the offence, as we have already observed, the High Court had companye to the companyclusion on the other evidence which does number suffer from any infirmity that there was numberreasonable doubt about the appellants guilt.
3,000/ sometime about December 27, 1961 and payment of Rs.
The purchase by the appellant of gold worth Rs.
S.P. Thorat, Baburao Patil and Rajabhau Nimbalkar were likely to be the members In our opinion, therefore, the prosecution has fairly established its case that a companyspiracy of the nature as alleged by it existed.
The question is whether the judgment of the High Court has violated any of these principles.
1 to 3 in yielding to the interrogation of the D.S.P. and producing the property form, in our opinion, a sufficiently strong chain of circumstances to establish that a criminal companyspiracy of the nature as alleged by the prosecution had companye to be formed and sought to be executed and of the said companyspiracy, apart from thieves themselves P.S.I. Patil, Dy.
D. Dua, J. This appeal Crl.
A review petition under O XL of the Supreme Court Rules Review Petition No.
A. No.
201 of 1966 along with three other appeals including an appeal by the State against the acquittal of two accused persons was disposed of by us on September 28, 1970.
He had further given monetary help to Viswasrao Phote in the election in 1957.
13,000/ to one Anna Gund, owner of a grocery shop on or about February 27, 1962 when the appellant was indebted to some other persons was also held number to be of much significance because the appellant was number companysidered to be a man of any substance, He had landed property and he also owned houses.
