But the deed of adoption which was executed on that very day was registered on October 31, 1950.
Muddappa who was the natural born son of Gange Gowda Jr. and his second wife Ramamma defendant No.
The plaint alleged that even though several demands were made to deliver possession of half of the joint family property to which the plaintiff was entitled, the defendants did number deliver it to him.
He, therefore, claimed a partition of the joint family property, possession of his half share therein and mesne profits.
2 and according to him, was adopted by Eramma Sr.
After the adoption, however, Eramma Jr. the 5th defendant executed a deed of gift in favour of her brothers Purande Gowda and Nanjunda Gowda, defendants 6 and 7, on September 28, 1950 whereunder she companyveyed the joint family property which at family partition in the year 1940 had been allotted to her share.
The suit was resisted by defendants 5, 6 and 7 but number by the other defendants, who, ft may be mentioned, are the other members of the family.
R. Mudholkar, J. The point in dispute amongst the parries to this appeal by certificate from a judgment of the High Court of Mysore pertains to the adoption of the plaintiff respondent No.
1, Muddappa.
