Petition No.1402 of 2007 filed by them under Section 482 of the Code for quashing of FIR No.170 of 2007 pending before the High Court of Rajasthan, Jaipru Bench, to the High Court of Delhi.
Admittedly petitioner Monica has initiated some criminal cases against her husband and in laws.
He has numberhing to do with the matrimonial dispute and or the criminal case filed by the petitioner Monica against her husband and her in laws.
Husband and mother in law of Monica were declared proclaimed offenders.
The same is said to be jointly owned by respondent Nos.
from the Court of Additional District Judge, Jaipur to the Court of Additional District Sessions Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi and for transfer of execution proceedings under Section 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for short the Code in respect of property No.433, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur, to the Deputy Commission of Police, South Zone, New Delhi.
Petitioner Monica, who appears in person would companytend that as a criminal case under Section 498A/406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and other proceedings against her husband her parents in law at Patiala House Courts, New Delhi are pending in which she had been appearing in person, proceedings pending at Jaipur be transferred to Delhi.
1 and 2 and father in law of petitioner Monica.
Respondent No.1, however, when checked the original order from the Court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi, and came to learn that the order actually was issued under Section 83 4 c of the Code and number under Section 83 4 a .
Allegedly S.H.O., P.S. Moti Dungri, Jaipur within whose jurisdiction the said property is situate was number co operative.
On an allegation that the Monica and her mother petitioners had forged the stay order dated 10th July, 2007 without seeking clarifications from the companyrt of learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi, first information report was lodged by the first respondent Satish Sharma with the companycerned Police Station.
259 260 of 2007 have been filed by Monica and her mother, Smt.
Father in law of petitioner Monica had a joint property at Jaipur.
They had been granted bail.
Property of the mother in law of Monica at Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi, was sealed.
However, the said property was attached by S.H.O. P.S. Moti Dungri unilaterally on 20th June, 2007 in terms of Section 83 4 c of the Code i.e. to maintain status quo.
Petitioner Monica thereafter filed an application before the trial companyrt at Delhi that the property be sealed in terms of Section 83 4 a of the Code whereupon a direction in that behalf was issued on 10th July, 2007.
Revision Petition No.62 of 2007 tiled Satish Sharma and another vs. Monica and others filed by respondent No.1.
B. SINHA, J. Transfer Petition Crl.
258 of 2007 has been filed by Monica seeking transfer of Crl.
Vinay Malhotra for transfer of S.B. Crl.
Inter alia on the premise that they had jumped bail, proceedings under Section 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure were initiated against them.
It was alleged that the petitioners had produced the said forged order dated 10th July, 2007 before the local police.
If the respondents companycerned are in physical possession of the property, the question of dispossessing them by way of attachment for jumping of bail by the father in law of the petitioner did number arise.
Respondent No.1 is a relative of father in law of the petitioner.
