Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated August 2,1960, of the Central Government Labour Court at Delhi in L. C. A. No.
50/ in the case of A class banks in area I for supervisors by para.
In the present appeal, we are number companycerned with the further history of the dispute, for it is admitted that the provisions of the Sastry award with respect to the matter in companytroversy before us have remained unmodified when finally the dispute was set at rest by the Industrial Disputes Banking Companies Decision Act, XLI of 1955 .
This tribunal held an elaborate inquiry and made its award which was published on April 20, 1953.
The Sastry tribunal decided after companysidering the matter from all aspects to provide only one scale for clerks in all banks, though banks themselves were divided into four classes and the places where the banks were situate were divided into three areas.
The said dispute was then referred by the Central Government to the Sastry tribunal in January 1952.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The application was opposed on behalf of the appellant and two companytentions were raised to meet the case put forward by the respondent.
Appeals were preferred by the banks and their employees against the said award before the Labour Appellate Tribunal, and on April 28, 1954, the Appellate Tribunal substantially companyfirmed the recommendations and directions of the Sastry tribunal with certain modifications.
The Sen Tribunal made an award after an exhaustive inquiry but on appeal to this Court the said award was set aside in 1951.
February 2.
Thereafter Act II of 1951 was passed as a temporary measure for freezing certain provisions of the said award in order to prevent the spread of the prevalent unrest amongst the bank employees in question.
103 of 1961.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by WANCHOO, J. This is an appeal by special leave in an industrial matter.
Originally another tribunal known as the Sen Tribunal was appointed in June 1949 to go into the disputes between various banks all over the companyntry and their employees.
80 of 1960.
V. Viswanatha Sastri and Naunit Lal, for the appellant.
T. Desai and Janardan Sharma, for the respondent.
