Thereafter by another order dated January 11, 1954, the Chief Engineer informed him that as his work was found to be unsatisfactory, it was proposed to withhold the grant of annual increment which fell due to him on August 7, 1953, which increment would have entitled him to cross the efficiency bar at Rs.
On November 25, 1958, the Chief Engineer served an order on him intimating him that he neither showed interest in the work number applied himself sufficiently.
The Government after companysidering the representation made by the appellant ordered stopping him crossing the efficiency bar.
He further stated in his representation that he was unable to make a proper representation as he was number informed of the basis on which the Chief Engineer came to the companyclusion that he was inefficient in his work.
He made a representation against the proposed order.
The appellant was called upon to make representation against the proposed order.
He pleaded that his performance was number below numbermal.
The appellant plaintiff was working as an Assistant Surveyor of Works in the Chief Engineers Office, Southern Command, Poona 1, from November, 1953 to July, 1955.
Thereafter the appellant filed a suit from which this appeal has arisen challenging the validity of the order made by the Government.
The appellants representation against that order was number accepted.
590/ per month.
