But after recording all these findings companycurrently the companyrts also held that the plaintiffs family has numberhereditary right for the performance of Kazhakam and that the plaintiff companyld be hired and fired at the sweet will by the defendant No.1.
The appellant filed S.A. bio.
669 of 1976 and assailed the judgments and decrees of the companyrts below.
The plaintiff in O.S. No.
It is stated in the appeal memorandum that both the companyrts held thus the plaintiffs family has been performing the Kazhakam 2 the plaintiffs family had been given Mala Virthy by the swaroopam, 3 that the plaintiffs family has been performing the Kazhakam in the two temples from time immemorial for which they had been given viruthy tenure.
