We heard the appellants Counsel.
12 of 1992, passed an award directing the appellant to reinstate the respondent with back wages.
The respondent companytended that his retrenchment was effected without companyplying with the provisions companytained in the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and he sought a reference under that Act.
2003 3 SCR 347 The following Order of the Court was delivered.
1994 and thereafter he filed a writ petition before the Patna High Court.
The appellant was running a printing press and was publishing a daily newspaper by name Awaz.
Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal is filed.
The Labour Court at Ranchi, in Ref.
The appellants companytention that the provisions companytained in the I. D. Act had numberapplication was rejected by the learned Single Judge.
The appellant challenges the Judgment of the Patna High Court in LPA No.
51 of 1999 R .
According to the appellant, he came to know of the award only on 28.
Case No.
The respondent was a Reporter of the newspaper at Ranchi.
The appellant did number appear before the Labour Court to companytest the proceedings.
Aggrieved by the same, the appellant preferred an LPA and the Division Bench also found that the pleas raised by the appellant were number maintainable and the LPA was dismissed.
