Appeal by Special leave from the judgment and order dated the 27th May, 1966 of the Calcutta High Court in Award Case No.
On August 22, 1963, they companyld, however, agree to refer their disputes to the arbitration of two persons, Sri R.N. Sharma and Sri C.M. Sharma.
From this part of the order the appellant filed an appeal, but the appeal was dismissed as unmaintainable by a Division Bench.
We shall first take up the civil appeal.
320 1963.
It is a running business.
But he declined the request of the appellant to proceed to pronounce judgement according to the award.
It has a factory and various movable and immovable properties.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL Appeal No.
K. Mehta, K.R. Nagaraja, M. Qamaruddin and Vinod Dhawan, for the appellant and petitioner.
1625 of 1967.
P. Maheshwari, Suresh Sethi and R. K. Maheshwari, for the respondent.
The appellant has number preferred the present appeal against the decision of the single Judge declining to pronounce judgement in accordance with the award.
He has also filed the special leave petition against the judgment of the Division Bench.
As usual with many partnerships, the partner did number march in step for long Within six months they fell out.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DWIVEDI, J., Before us there is this associate litigation the civil appeal and the special leave petition for admission.
Its history runs thus There is the New Bengal Engineering Works.
The business was set up by the appellant and the respondent as partners in December 1962.
