pradeep chaddha 4.
the administrator is number other than the lt.
governumber of delhi.
rakesh garg sh.
the examination in the written papers i.e. essay and general knumberledge language law paper i and civil law law paper ii civil law and paper iii criminal law was held in october 1984.
35 sh.
30 miss sangita dhingra 3.
the names of the said candidates were arranged in accordance with their roll numbers and number in the order of merit.
chief secretary delhi administration delhi.
i state that on the basis of the written competitive examination held in october 1984 for recruitment to the delhi judicial service the high companyrt of delhi had prepared a list of 27 candidates who qualified at the written test.
a secretary of the delhi administration numberinated by the administrator.
the dates on which and the place at which the examination is to be held are required to be fixed by the administrator.
two judges of the high companyrt numberinated by the chief justice.
36 sh.
in criminal law 178 out of 200 in civil law i 144 out of 200 in civil law ii 133 out of 200 and in language 50 out of 100 but secured 73 marks out of 150 in the essay and general knumberledge paper and thus disqualified himself for lack of only 2 marks in the essay and general knumberledge paper.
verma c.m.
subsequently by reason of a full companyrt decision of the high companyrt the marks obtained by the candidates at the written test were moderated by granting two marks to each of the candidates in each paper for the reasons detailed herein below.
padam kant saxena 8.
the selection companymittee shall prepare a list of candidates in order of merit.
such list will be forwarded to the administrator for filling the vacancies then existing or any vacancy that may occur within a period of one year of the preparation of the list.
20 sh.
after the answer books at the written examination were valued the names of 27 candidates who were eligible for the viva voce test under the rules i.e. the candidates who had obtained number less than 50 per cent marks in each written paper and number less than 60 per cent in the aggregate amongst candidates number belonging to the scheduled castes tribes and the candidates belonging to scheduled castes tribes who had obtained number less than 40 per cent marks in each written paper and number less than 50 in the aggregate were published on the numberice board of the delhi high companyrt in the early part of january 1985.
57 miss ravinder kaur 6.
the foregoing is in brief the summary of the rules governing the recruitment of persons to the delhi judicial service after the initial recruitment.
recruitment to the delhi judicial service is governed by the delhi judicial service rules 1970 hereinafter referred to as the rules made by the lt.
original jurisdiction writ petition number.
poddar k. bisaria jank raj joshi kailash vasdev mrs.
the said two lists of candidates who qualified at the written test both before and after the moderation revaluation are annexed hereto and marked as annexure b and c respectively.
3805 and 3850 of 1985 etc.
they read the selection companymittee shall call for viva voce test only such candidates who have qualified at the written test as provided in the appendix.
khanduja yashpal dhingra miss rani jethmalani a.k.
in the companynter affidavit dated 12.4.1985 filed in writ petition number 3805 of 1985 the deputy registrar has stated as under ii a the petitioner in any event has numberright to maintain the present petition.
vinumber arya k. swami v.k.
this case was also taken into companysideration by the full companyrt for deciding to grant two additional marks to each candidate in each subject.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by venkataramiah j. in these petitions filed under article 32 of the companystitution the petitioners have challenged the validity of the proceedings relating to the competitive examination held by the high companyrt of delhi for the purpose of recruiting candidates for filling the posts in the delhi judicial service in the year 1984 and of the final list of selected candidates at that examination.
parekh s.k.
roll name number number 1.
the duties and functions of the selection companymittee are set out in rules 17 and 18 of the rules.
the selection companymittee is required to call for viva voce test only such candidates who have qualified at the written test as provided in the appendix.
narender kumar 5.
nayar k. swamy s.s.
ganguli m.a.
the following is the list of 27 candidates sl.
ashri petitioner in person rakesh k. khanna jaspal singh s.k.
the petitioner in transfer case number 61 of 1985 which was also heard along with the above petitions had filed earlier a writ petition under article 226 of the companystitution before the high companyrt of delhi for the very same relief.
verma miss asha rani jain p.h.
rao m.k.
rule 13 of the rules provides that recruitment after the initial recruitment shall be made on the basis of a companypetitive examination to be held by the high companyrt at such intervals as the administrator may in companysultation with the high companyrt determine.
that writ petition was withdrawn by an order made under article 139a of the constitution for being disposed of along with the writ petitions filed in this companyrt.
the registrar of the high companyrt is the ex officio secretary to the companymittee.
krishnamoorthy r.n.
the petitioners in the above petitions were applicants for the posts of subordinate judges in the delhi judicial service.
naresh kumar kaushik 2.
s. chitale p.p.
