1311 of 2005 and W.A. No.
7940 of 1999 and directed the Commissioner Appeals to hear the appeal and pass appropriate orders.
1781 of 2005 were filed by the respondents challenging the order passed by the learned Single Judge.
13927 of 2003.
Pursuant to the directions given by the learned Single Judge, the Commissioner Appeals heard the appeal filed by APHB.
5.21 Total area of survey number 1009 666.25 A sketch of survey number 1009 showing the above details is prepared and submitted herewith.
A learned Single Judge of the High Court heard the writ petition and by a judgment and order dated 19th April, 2005 allowed it and quashed the order of the Commissioner Appeals .
Proceedings before the learned Single Judge Feeling aggrieved by the dismissal of its appeal by the Commissioner Appeals , a writ petition was filed by APHB in the Andhra Pradesh High Court and that was numbered as W.P. No.
In the meanwhile, status quo was directed to be maintained.
The Commissioner Appeals was of opinion that A. Nos./2018 SLP C Nos.
21856 21862 of 2010 Page 12 of 31 Only 661.04 acres of land was acquired out of the larger area in Survey No.1009 The claim made by the respondents that 11.10 acres out of Survey No.1009 was number acquired was number a belated claim The companyrection sought by the respondents in their claim under Section 87 of the Act was the companyrection of a clerical error under paragraph 5 d of the Circular dated 15 th October, 1994.
Madan B. Lokur, J. Leave granted.
Proceedings before the Division Bench Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge on 19th April, 2005, writ appeals being W.A. No.
The writ petition was numbered as the W.P. No.
companyered by built up area 288.00 Open land under possession of Housing Board 358.04 Land left for Graveyard Burial ground by the Housing Board 15.00 661.04 Land under Manjeera Pipeline Water works Dept.
By an order dated 4th January, 2003 the Commissioner Appeals upheld the view of the District Revenue Officer dated 9th June, 1998 and dismissed the appeal.
On 31st October, 2001 the learned Single Judge decided W.P. No.
By the impugned judgment and order dated 25th September, 2009 the writ appeals were allowed by the Division Bench and it is under these circumstances that the present appeals are before us.
