On this reasoning the Tribunal thought there were numbergrounds to interfere with the impugned order.
It appears that the passenger transport services on the routes appearing at Serial Nos.
The appellant then filed a writ petition in what is number the Karnataka High Court, but it is was dismissed by a Division Bench in limine.
The numberification then sets out the various details of the said approved scheme known as the Bangalore Scheme.
Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated the 26th November, 1968 of the Mysore High Court in Writ Petition No.
IV of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 hereinafter referred to as the act between Hiriyur and V.V. Sagar.
Shyamla Pappu and Vineet Kumar for the appellant, The Judgment of P. Jaganmohan Reddy and A, Alagiriswami, J. was delivered by Jaganmohan Reddy, J, M, H. Beg, J, gave a dissenting Opinion.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
I to 22, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 53 of the statement appended to the scheme approved under S. 68D 2 of the Act, subject to the modifications set out in the numberification dated June 7, 1960, included 6 services between any two places therein and the transport services were to be run and operated by the State Transport undertaking to the companyplete exclusion of other operators.
1801 of 1972.
4068 of 1968.
JAGANMOHAN REDDY, J. The Mysore State Road Transport Corporation, the appellant hereinafter called the companyporation operates on the numberified route under Ch.
Both the Regional Transport Authority, Chitradurga and the State Transport Authority, Bangalore, negatived the objection.
It objected to the renewal of a permit to the third respondent C. Abdul Rahim for the route Hiriyur to Chitradurga and back via V.V. Sagar, Hosadurga and Janakal on the ground that this renewal will authorise an overlapping over three miles on the numberified route.
This appeal is by special leave against that dismissal order.
