Second, the oral extra judical companyfession of the accused before P.Ws.
As regards PW Kamla Kurnari, the High Court has found it highly unsafe to companyvict the appellant on the uncorroborated testimony of this child witness.
Om Prakash and Ghanshyam Das.
The prosecution demanded companyviction of the respondent on two types of evidence.
First, the ocular account of the sole eye witness Kumari Kamla, aged about 9 or 10 years.
The High Court found that the evidence of the extra judical companyfession was wholly untrustworthy.
O.P. Rana, amicus curiae for the respondent, and examined the evidence on record carefully.
