All the persons who were in actual possession of any part of the suit property were companytinued to remain in possession.
767 of 1998 and dismissal of the special leave petition, the Receiver deemed to have been discharged.
The trial companyrt rejected the prayer for appointment of Receiver by order dated 3.5.1980 and against that, appellant moved the High Court in First Appeal, which was finally heard and order dated 22.7.1980 was passed appointing the Court Receiver.
The special leave petition filed against the judgment of the High Court was also dismissed on 19.2.2007.
37 of 1980 before the District Judge, Thane Court seeking specific performance of the sale of the property and possession and interim relief of injunction restraining the defendants therein from carrying on further companystruction on the suit property.
The Court Receiver also submitted Additional Report No.383 of 2012.
Indisputably, the suit was finally disposed of on 4.2.1998.
It further reveals from the record that the Court Receiver so appointed submitted Report No.25/2007 before the High Court seeking directions with regard to the encroachment on the suit property and handing over possession to the appellant.
It appears that the suit property was declared as evacuee property and the same was purchased by the appellant in an auction sale as far back as on 15.6.1964.
The Receiver was directed to companylect rent and companypensation as the case may be from all the persons in actual possession after verifying from them their present right to remain in possession.
In the year 1980, the appellant filed a suit being Civil Suit No.
The appellant further made a prayer for appointment of Receiver.
The High Court further directed that the Receiver should take suitable direction from the companyrt if he was presented with any particular difficulty.
As against the judgment and decree of the trial companyrt, First Appeal was filed being F.A. No.767 of 1988, which was finally heard and dismissed by the High Court vide judgment dated 22.12.2004.
While disposing the suit, the trial companyrt gave liberty to the plaintiff appellant to move the High Court for directions for taking possession of the suit property from the Court Receiver so appointed by the High Court.
The High Court while making appointment of the Receiver directed to take possession of the suit property.
Y. Eqbal, J. Leave granted.
In the instant appeals by special leave the appellant assailed the order dated 14th January, 2013 passed by the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Court Receivers Report No.25 of 2007 and Additional Report No.
383 of 2012, whereby the High Court while disposing of the Report of the Court Receiver held that after the disposal of First Appeal No.
