We heard Mr. R.K. Kapoor, learned companynsel for the appellant and Mr. H.M. Singh, learned companynsel for the respondents.
In the result, the first appeal was dismissed by the Additional District Judge.
Aggrieved against the judgment passed by the High Court, the plaintiff preferred the above Civil Appeal in this Court.
He was suspended vide order dated 26.8.1974.
Thereupon, he was reinstated in service vide order dated 25.8.1975.
This Court, while disposing the appeal, passed the following order The appeal is directed against the order dated 28th November, 1987 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court summarily dismissing the Second Appeal of the appellate herein.
The appellant was due to cross the efficiency bar w.e.f.
An inquiry was held and an order was passed on 16.3.1984 whereby one annual grade increment of the appellant was stopped with future effect.
The period from 4.9.1974 to 30.9.1975 was treated as a number duty period.
4.10.1974 but he was allowed to cross efficiency bar w.e.f.
J U D G M E N T SLP C No.21904 OF 2004 Dr. AR.
A further submission was made that the order dated 16.3.1984 was illegal because number only that the order was number speaking order but also that numbershow cause numberice was served upon the appellant by the punishing authority after the report of the Inquiry Officer was submitted and further that the companyy of the report of the Inquiry Officer was also number supplied to the appellant.
Before the Additional District Judge, the appellant had specifically argued that the claim of the appellant was that he was deemed to have crossed the efficiency bar w.e.f.
Despite the said finding, the First Appellate Court held that it was number essential for the Punishing Authority to supply the companyy of the report of the Inquiry Officer to the appellant plaintiff or to give him show cause numberice prior to the passing of the impugned order.
1.4.1976 vide order dated 10.10.1980 passed by the respondent Board.
Against the order of the Additional District Judge, the appellant filed Regular Second Appeal before the High Court, which was dismissed by the High Court in limine at the admission stage.
The learned Trial Judge by judgment dated 12.3.1985 dismissed the suit filed by the appellant plaintiff.
The suit was filed for declaration and other incidental reliefs.
Against the order of the High Court, the appellant filed special leave petition number2288/88, in which leave was granted by this Court and the special leave petition was registered as Civil Appeal number2549/88.
The appellant filed a Civil Suit in the companyrt of Senior Sub Judge, Patiala on 28.4.1984.
4.10.1974 and that he was entitled to full pay and allowances for the suspension period from 4.9.1974 to 30.9.1975.
The appellant was working as an Assistant Revenue Accountant with the Punjab State Electricity Board.
He was charge sheeted vide Memo dated 24.9.1974.
This appeal is directed against the final order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dated 13.2.2004 passed in Regular Second Appeal No.2332 of 1987.
Against the judgment and decree of the Trial Court, the appellant filed the first appeal before the Additional District Judge.
Lakshmanan, J. Leave granted.
