The order of the Rent Controller was upheld in appeal.
A portion of the building is occupied by the appellant alongwith her three sons for the residence of the family.
The landlady sought for a review which was declined by the High Court.
However, the same has been set aside by the High Court in the revision preferred by the tenant.
Another portion of the same building is held by the respondent as tenant for number residential purpose on a monthly rent of Rs.400/ .
The aggrieved landlady has filed these appeals by special leave.
The appellant initiated proceedings for eviction of the tenant under Section 10 3 a iii of the Tamil Nadu Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act, 1960 hereinafter the Act, for short by alleging that her third son Venkatesh required the premises in occupation of tenant for companymencing his own business of car air conditioning.
C. Lahoti, J. Leave granted.
The Rent Controller directed the tenant respondent to be evicted.
The suit property is a building described as door No.21, 7th Avenue, Ashok Nagar, Madras 83.
It is owned by the landlady appellant.
