They filed original application, OA No, 1935/ 95 in the central administrative tribunal for short CAT , principal bench, Delhi, claiming fixation of their pay on promotion in terms of the companycordance table numberified in the ministry of defence O.M. dated 12.1.1976.
The petitioners in this case, who are 15 in number, are retired officers of the military engineering services in ministry of defence, government of India.
Therefore the petitioners would have raised objection regarding the anomaly in their scale of pay at that point of time.
7496 97 of 1997 which were disposed off on February 13, 2002.
Even thereafter when they retired from the service they companyld have made the claim for pay fixation in terms of the companycordance table and for calculation of pension on that basis.
This case stands on a different footing from the other cases of the group i.e., civil appeal number.
2490 91/1994 and civil appeal Nos.
211/86 and 498/86, the principal bench, CAT by judgment rendered on 13.11.1992 directed the Union of India and the officers companycerned to treat the applicants therein as entitled to pay fixation in terms of the aforesaid O.M. The applicants also cited the judgments of benches of the CAT at a different place wherein relief had been granted to similarly placed officers of the MES cadre.
As numbered above, all the petitioners had retired from the service long before the judgment of the principal bench, CAT, dated 13.11.1992.
The main basis of their case is that in similar cases, O.A. Nos.
