91 and 15 were number available having been allotted to other members of the companyperative society, the respondent filed an execution application for allotment of the said plot No.
6 a sale deed was executed by the companyperative society in favour petitioner for plot No.
6 was only directed to be allotted in favour of the petitioner.
In the award made in favour of the respondent, it was directed that any of the 3 plots namely, plot Nos.
66 and execution of sale deed in her favour.
Petitioner sought to rely upon the docrtine of lis pendens to companytend that the said execution application was number maintainable.
66, admeasuring 45 ft.
However, treating the said plot to be 66 instead of plot No.
If in execution of the said award a sale deed in respect of plot No.6 in his favour.
The arbitrator directed allotment of plot No.
In the year 1981 an award was passed in favour of the petitioner.
66, the execution petition filed at the instance of the respondent was maintainable.
x 80 ft.
total area 3600 sq.ft situated at Jawahar Nagar Extension Colony, Mauja Bhadeni Pargana Dehat, City Varanasi.
66, 91 or 15 may be allotted in her favour.
The revision petition filed thereagainst has also been dismissed.
The dispute between the parties relates to plot No.
Another dispute arose between the respondent and the companyperative society in relation to award of a plot in her favour.
As a dispute arose between petitioner and a companyperative society, the same was referred to arbitration.
As the plot Nos.
ORDER Leave granted.
In relation thereto, an objection filed by the petitioner herein has been dismissed.
