After hearing learned companynsel for the parties and examining the record we are of the opinion that the writ petition filed by the appellants did raise some arguable points and the High Court fell in error in dismissing the same in limine.
A Division Bench of that Court dismissed their writ petition in limine on 20 4 1992.
Against the termination of their services by an order of 22 1 1990, the appellants approached the High Court through CWJC No.
To the special leave petitions filed by the appellants, companynter affidavit was filed and certain documents were placed on record.
The absence of reasons has deprived this Court of knowing the circumstance which weighed with the High Court to dismiss the writ petition at the threshold.
No reasons have been advanced by the High Court in support of its companyclusions while dismissing the writ petition.
That order has been put in issue in this appeal.
The appellants also filed a rejoinder to the companynter affidavit.
Leave granted.
1184 of 1990.
