The appellant Electricity Board before us employed the respondent on the terms and companyditions mentioned in the appointment letter dated November 28, 1984 which provided that i he will be on training for a period of six months and the same may be extended or curtailed as the case maybe ii on satisfactory companypletion of training and passing the written test companyducted thereafter he will be eligible to be companysidered for appointment as Officer, Grade III and in case he fails in written test appraisal test after training, he will be liable for termination.
The respondent raised a dispute as to termination of his services and the Labour Court by an order made on February 17, 1990 held that the termination of the services of the respondent was number proper ahd directed his reinstatement with payment of back wages.
The respondent number having passed the requisite test, his period of training was extended for further term and ultimately it is stated that he number having passed the said test his services were terminated on March 10, 1986 itself in terms of tbe appointment order.
Leave granted.
The matter was carried to the High Court.
the case, of the respondent does number fall within the purview of retrenchment because his services came to be terminated as a result of number renewal of companytract of employment and the stipulation provided in the companytract itself.
