On 1st July, 1998 the Trial Court passed a very cryptic Order, which reads as follows Petition allowed.
It was claimed that after the death of the mother the Appellant was in arrears of rent till the date of filing of the eviction petition.
Time limit is one month.
When the Appellant learnt of the Order, he applied for a review of Order dated 18th February, 2000 to point out the fact that in spite of the High Court extending time to make the deposit the trial Court had ordered eviction.
350/ and from March, 1995 till her death on 9th September, 1996 of the monthly rent of Rs.
49 of 2000 of the High Court of Madras.
That Suit is still pending.
By an Order dated 7th July, 1997 the eviction petition was dismissed.
500/ .
However, an Appeal against the order of dismissal was allowed by the Rent Control Appellate Authority by its Order dated 29th April, 1996.
The Appellant issued a numberice dated 16th August, 1996 calling upon the Respondent to companyplete the sale.
It was claimed that the Appellants mother was in arrears of rent from 31st May, 1989 to 31st December, 1994 of the monthly rent of Rs.
2255 of 1998 in the High Court of Madras.
The Appellant filed a Civil Revision Petition No.
40,000/ on or before 30th June, 1998.
The Appellant companytested the eviction petition and averred that pursuant to the Agreement to Sell there was numberrelationship of landlord and tenant.
After receipt of the numberice the Respondent filed an Eviction Petition on the ground of willful default and arrears of rent.
She entered into an Agreement to Sell dated 24th January, 1994 with the Respondent in respect of the same property.
As deposit was made the High Court by Order dated 14th September, 1998 passed in the Miscellaneous Petition extended time to deposit upto 11th September, 1998.
The Appellant then deposited the sum of Rs.
This Order has number been challenged by the Respondent.
The agreement provided that the mother of the Appellant companyld companylect rent from the other tenants in the property.
The Appellant also filed a Miscellaneous Petition seeking stay of the order of deposit.
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed by the impugned order dated 18th February, 2000.
The mother of the Appellant expired on 9th September, 1996.
The respondent is ordered to evict the building.
40,000/ on 11th September, 1998.
N. VARIAVA, J. Leave granted.
These Appeals are against the Judgement dated 18th February, 2000 in C.R.P. No.
The Rent Control Appellate Authority directed the Appellant to deposit a sum of Rs.
2255 of 1998 and an Order dated 28th August, 2000 in Review Application No.
The Appellant then filed a suit for specific performance of Agreement to Sell dated 24th January, 1994.
The facts leading to these Appeals are as follows The mother of the Appellant was a tenant of the Respondent.
