The appellant demanded a sum of Rs.
On being demanded money the companyplainant became angry and he took away the papers from the appellant.
The Disciplinary Committee characterised this accusation as very serious and adverted to the evidence in this regard.
However, on the first two accusations the appellant was exonerated and there being numberappeal against the same we are number any longer companycerned with them in this appeal.
On her behalf an application under Section 125 Criminal Procedure Code was presented in the companyrt of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bhusawal by the appellant at the instance of the companyplainant.
The said accusation is as follows Pramila is a daughter of the companyplainant.
2000/ from the companyplainant to bride Shri Kalar who was the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, to obtain a result in her favour.
Rajendra Babu, J. This appeal arises out of an order made by the Bar Council of India in its disciplinary jurisdiction on three accusations against the appellant who is an advocate.
