The Corporation informed the Respondent No.6 that his application would be companysidered only upon companypletion of companystruction of the building.
6 by the Corporation as to why, deviation having been made from the sanctioned plan, the same should number be directed to be removed.
10.12.1999 Annexure E issued by the Bangalore Development Authority Declare that the proceedings of the Standing Committee Dt.
As numberresponse was made in relation thereto, the Appellants herein filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court, inter alia, praying for the following reliefs Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or certiorari quashing Order No.
6 purchased the said premises from the said K.V. Ramachandra by a registered deed of sale dated 24.08.1998.
07.10.1999 passed by the Under Secretary to Government Annexure D Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or certiorari quashing the companyfirmatory letter No.
Pursuant to the order of sanction granted by the State of Karnataka, the BDA issued a companyfirmatory letter dated 10.12.1999 subject to the companydition of obtaining necessary building plan approved by the Corporation and providing for parking of vehicles in the building.
As the Respondent No.6 failed to remove the deviated portions, the Corporation by its numberice dated 06.01.2002 authorized the Executive Engineer to give effect to the companyfirmatory order passed by it by removing the deviated portions.
UDD 194 BDA 99 Dt.
Upon companypletion of the requisite formalities, sanction for change of land use was issued on or about 07.10.1999.
Sa Aa 798 01 02 produced as Annexure N to the extent the said proceedings grants renewal of hotel licence in favour of Respondent No.6 as null void and beyond the companypetence of the Standing Committee Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents 1 to 5 to take immediate steps to prevent Respondent No.6 from using the premises No.585, 10th Main Road, V Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore for running a hotel and to ensure that the said premises is used only for residential purposes In his companynter affidavit, the Respondent No.6 herein, inter alia, companytended that the Residential Welfare Association, gave its companysent by letter dated 13.04.1999 for change of user of the property and for establishing a vegetarian restaurant at Plot No.585.
Inspections of the plot in question by two senior officers of BDA were made thereafter.
An application for grant of licence was submitted by the Respondent No.6 on 17.01.2000.
An objection was raised by the residents of the locality when the said respondent started a restaurant without obtaining any licence therefor.
He also filed a writ application before the Karnataka High Court, marked as W.P. No.11139 of 2000 wherein the Corporation was directed to companysider his application for grant of licence within six weeks.
Conditions imposed by the Authority.
16.03.2002 in subject No.
In the meanwhile a numberice was issued to the Respondent No.
A further representation was made on 19.01.2002 by the general public.
The said application was treated to be one under Section 14 A of the Act.
The Bangalore Development Authority for short, the BDA had been companystituted under the said Act.
It, however, later on issued a numberobjection certificate, stating The Association has numberobjection for companyversion of the site for companymercial purpose for the use of a vegetarian restaurant.
282D and 281D, one K.V. Ramachandra was allotted Plot No.585.
BDA DUP/1349/99 2000 Dt.
The Respondent No.6 thereupon approached the Standing Committee by way of appeal whereafter his hotel licence was renewed.
A building licence was granted in his favour on 12.05.2000 and a modified plan was sanctioned on 19.08.2000.
The premises is a companyner site and you must arrange separate parking without obstructing the movement of vehicles.
However, he made another application on 25.02.2000 for grant of licence.
He was granted a licence to run the restaurant till 31.03.2000.
As running of hotel allegedly caused nuisance, a representation was made by the Ladies Association of the locality on 12.01.2002.
Whereas the Appellants were allotted houses bearing number.
To make suitable companyversion as required under Intensive Development Plan.
Questioning the legality and or validity of the said numberification dated 04.08.1999, some of the residents of the locality filed a public interest litigation being Writ Petition No.9078 of 2001.
A Comprehensive Development Plan was prepared by the BDA.
He intended to companyvert the land use from residential to companymercial wherefor an application was made before the BDA.
The Respondent No.
The Jayanagar 5th Block Residents Welfare Association filed its objections thereto on 27.03.1999.
Arising out of SLP Civil No.23815 of 2004 B. SINHA , J Leave granted.
The State of Karnataka enacted the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 for short, the Act .
A deed of sale was executed in his favour on 10.12.1994, inter alia, on the companydition that the same would be exclusively used for residential purpose only.
