102/1995 and will pass such order within a period of three months from the date of service of the companyy of the said order.
The affected appointees again approached the High Court by way of second writ petition being CWJC No.
Feeling aggrieved, the respondents untrained teachers filed one more CWJC No.
The decision is to be taken and admitted dues are to be paid in favour of the appellants, within a period of four months from the date of receipt production of a companyy of this order.
535 765/ .
102/1995 which was decided by the Division Bench on January 27, 1997.
In pursuance of the order of the High Court, the respondents appointees produced the relevant testimonials but the State Government insisted upon them to produce the certificates pertaining to their training.
12322 of 1993 which came to be rejected by order dated 13.01.1995.
10448 of 1997 before the High Court of Judicature at Patna.
2099 dated 25.06.1997 terminated the services of the respondents.
If the appellants have been appointed as untrained Assistant Teachers, without asking the appellants to produce the training certificates, the respondents will pay untrained scale of pay in favour of the appellants for the period they have actually performed their duty.
8158 8408 dated 25.6.1987.
The High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondents to file relevant educational certificates and the State was also directed to decide their claim.
In this background, according to this companyrt, there is numberquestion of production of training certificate by the appellants.
The respondents after appointment joined their respective posts and were number paid salary.
The relevant terms and companyditions companytained in the said appointment letter were that the Matric Trained Teachers would get higher pay scale of Rs.580 860/ whereas the Matric Untrained Teachers would get lower scale of pay of Rs.
The operative directions companytained in the said order read as under Admittedly, the appellants are number trained teachers.
Being aggrieved, the respondents untrained teachers filed Letters Patent Appeal No.
Facts, in brief are as under In the year 1987, the respondents herein along with others were appointed as Assistant Teachers by the District Superintendent of Education, Gaya vide order companytained in Memo No.
2099 of 1992 before the High Court of Judicature at Patna.
Aggrieved by the order of the learned Single Judge, the State preferred LPA No.
They, therefore, filed CWJC No.
10448 of 1997 dated 09.02.1999.
The learned Single Judge disposed of the said writ petition on 09.02.1999 at the admission stage itself with a direction to the State to pass an appropriate order about the claim of the respondents untrained teachers for payment of their salary in the untrained scale of pay in the light of the findings recorded by the Division Bench in LPA No.
Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. This appeal arises out of judgment and order dated 27.06.2001 of the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Letters Patent Appeal No.
