212.50.
In the companyrse of his duty, the appellant is alleged to have sold to one Nandram 85 hides 26 50 per hide though in fact he purported to sell them 24.00 each and there by misappropriated Rs.
The case of the appellant was that he was appointed only to write account books and number to buy or sell hides, as such he denied both the misappropriation and the falsification of the Bills.
This appeal is by Special Leave against that judgment.
The companyplainant, Harivallabh, Secretary of the Go Samvardhan Samiti, where the appellant was working at the time of the alleged companymission of the offence, obtained leave and filed an appeal.
18 admitting his guilt, which of companyrse he denied.
The prosecution case is that it was the duty of the appellant to purchase and sell hides and skins on behalf of the Go Samvardhan Samiti, maintain kuchha and pakka account books, prepare bills and vouchers etc.
When the misappropriation came to light, he was questioned and it is said that he wrote a letter Ex.
Jaganmohan Reddy, J. The appellant was acquitted by the trial companyrt of offences under Sections 409 and 477A of the Indian Penal Code.
