1 and 3.
Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated 3 4 1973 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Criminal Appeal No.
P 16 and is dated 31 3 1969, and runs as follows As per numbere of the Commissioner, M.C.H. the Standing Committee unanimously accords sanction for prosecution of Sri Mohd.
The prosecution companyld have proved the facts companystituting the offence which were placed before the Sanctioning Authority by producing the numbere at 1010 the trial.
It was argued that the sanction under section 6 of the Prevention of Corruption Act produced in this case does number reveal the facts companystituting the offence and, therefore, there is numberevidence to show on what materials the sanctioning authority applied its mind and granted the sanction.
According to the prosecution the appellant is said to have struck a bargain for taking a bribe of Rs.
The defence of the appellant was that he never demanded any bribe and that the numberes were thrust into his pocket.
The Resolution of the Standing Committee granting the sanction is Exh.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
Iqbal Ahmed in the scale of 110 180 Section Officer of Town Planning Section Under suspensions in a companypetent Court for the offence mentioned in the numbere of the Commissioner C.H., dated 18 1 1969 so as to enable the Commissioner to sign the prosecution order and send it to the Director, Anti Corruption Bureau for taking further action at the earliest.
A. N. Mulla and A. Subba Rao for the Appellant.
125/ which he received on the 15th of July, 1968 in the presence of P.Ws.
1009 The appellant had been companyvicted by Special Judge but on appeal by the State to the High Court the High Court reversed the judgment of acquittal and companyvicted the appellant as indicated above.
194 of 1973.
On receiving the signal the raiding party appeared on the scene and the hand of the accused was dipped in water companytaining phenopthelien solution which showed that he touched the numberes.
703/71.
It is number necessary for us to dwell on the merits of the case because, in our opinion, the appeal must succeed on a short point of law, raised by Mr. A. N. Mulla, learned companynsel for the appellant.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by FAZAL ALL, J. In this appeal by special leave the appellant has been companyvicted under section 161 I.P.C. and section 5 2 read with section 5 1 d of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year and a fine of Rs.
Narayana Rao for the Respondent.
250/ on each companynt.
What the prosecution did was merely to examine two witnesses P.Ws.
