The appellant then filed a review petition being Review Petition Crl.
Counsel for the State of Kerala submitted that the limit of small quantity as per the Notification is 1 gm.
The learned Additional Sessions Judge by his judgment and order dated 5th March, 1994 acquitted the appellant of the charge levelled against him.
533 of 1994 the acquittal of the appellant was set aside and the appeal preferred by the State was allowed.
The appellant was found guilty of the offence punishable under Section 21 of the NDPS Act and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of rupees one lakh, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one year.
On appeal by the State being Criminal Appeal No.
The appeal has number been placed before us for disposal.
An application has been filed by the appellant for permission to urge additional grounds in his appeal.
Thus the total quantity seized from the appellant would fall within the limit of small quantity used for medicinal purposes.
This Court numbericed that the total quantity involved is 25 ampoules of Buprenorphine Hydrocholride Titidigesic of 2 ml.
While allowing the review petition this Court observed that the appellant should have taken up a plea in the light of the decision of this Court in Hussain vs. State of Kerala 2000 8 SCC 139 in which the same article Buprenorphine Hydrocholride Tidigesic was found to be a psychotropic substance and the quantity which was found in possession of the accused was within the prescribed limit, being a small quantity.
The appellant was permitted to file a petition seeking permission to raise additional grounds in the appeal.
Consequently benefit of the same was granted to the accused in that case and he was acquitted.
The appellant preferred an appeal before this Court being Criminal Appeal No.
1022 of 1997 but the same was dismissed by this Court by judgment and order dated 7th August, 2001.
No.1236 of 2001 which was allowed by this Court and the appeal restored to its original number.
This Court felt, while allowing the review petition, that the appellant should be permitted to take up that companytention in this case in order to prevent a miscarriage of justice.
The case of the prosecution was that on 10th October, 1993 at about 7.45 p.m. he was found in possession of 25 ampoules of manufactured drug, namely Buprenorphine Hydrocholride Tidigesic alongwith three syringes when he was apprehended on the road near Blue Tronics Junction, Palluruthy.
P. Singh, J. The appellant herein was charged of having companymitted the offence punishable under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 hereinafter referred to as the NDPS Act and was put up for trial before the Ist Additional Sessions Court, Ernakulam.
