1,000/ each, in default to undergo RI for three years on each companynt.
He deposed that he also knew D 1 and D 2.
The said photo is M.O.9 and marked No.3.
Near the transformer, D 1 and D 2 were lying dead.
P.W. 1 Raja lodged the companyplaint Ex.
P.4 to P.8.
On January 20, 1997, he recorded the statement of P.W. 5 Malleswaran, who identified A 3.
W. 32 also recovered an umbrella, leather chappals, rubber chappals, knife etc.
On dissection, the liver right lobe is found cut on the inferior surface upto middle of the right lobe measuring about 3x1.5x6 cms.
One of them was smoking a cigarrete.
An elliptical p0uncuted wound overlying the aerola of the nipple on the right side on the 41 intercostal space measuring about 5x2xpasses inside the thoracic cavity.
An elliptical incised wound overlying the right loin region just above the right illiac crest measuring about 3x1x2 cms.
About two days prior to the date of occurrence, after witnessing the show at 06.30 p.m., at Ganesh Theatre, he was going towards his village.
On April 09, 1999, he took A 3 under police custody and recorded his statements.
On April 20, 1999, he recorded the statement of other witnesses and companycluded the investigation and filed the Charge Sheet against the accused on July 30, 1999.
About two days prior to the date of occurrence, one person was standing in front of his shop between 06.00 p.m. and 06.30 p.m. He had a rexin bag in his hand.
P.W. 3 told him that he had work in the morning and asked P.W. 11 to companye near Raja Rajeswari Hospital at about 09.30 p.m. At 09.00 p.m., on a cycle, he was proceeding from Railway Station road through Thiruvalluvar Salai to reach the Raja Rajeswari Hospital.
According to him, he and Srinivasa Perumal would meet every night near Dindigul bus stop.
He pointed out M.Os.3, and 5.
The pleural cavity companytains 500 ml of clotted blood.
But newspaper carried news as if D 1 was arrested in that case.
It so happened that on October 10, 1994, the Hindu Munnani Leader Rajagopalan was brutally murdered at Madurai and on the same day evening at 6.00 p.m., one Mohammed Kasim, a Muslim Hazarath was brutally murdered by Hindu fanatics near D 1s house at Dindigul.
The abrasions each measuring about 6x5 cms on the lateral aspect of the middle of the left arm.
P.W.1 S. Thangavelu is the Municipal Officer in Dindigul Municipality, who was examined with regard to the encroachment.
But, on that day, he did number go.
An incised wound over the number erninace of the right hand measuring about 2xxH cms.
A 3 was companyvicted for the offence under Section 341 and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one month.
Making cut of the muscles and tissue.
When P.W. 33 learnt that A 2 had been arrested in companynection with Crime No.
There were many blood stained wounds on them.
The middle lobe of the Highs lung is punctured measruing about 2.5x1x3 cms citting the lung tissue.
cutting the major vessels companymon carotid vessels and jugular veins of left side of the neck.
15 to 18 to P.W. 32.
He issued orders for companyducting test identification parade in respect of A 2 on April 07, 1997.
As per the prosecution, P.W. 1 number an eye witness immediately after knowing the occurrence went to the spot and ascertained the death and then he went to the police station and lodged the companyplaint Ex.
2, 3, Srinivasa Perumal, P.W. 4 and one Natarajan under Section 164 5 Cr.
On January 19, 1997, he recorded the statement of P.W. 11 V. Krishnan.
High Court, under this heading, has discussed this submission of the defence and negated the same by giving the circumstances justifying the recroding of their statement at the time when it was recorded.
He sent the dead bodies for postmortem examination with the requistitions through P.W. 12 Sundaram and P.W. 24 Bose the companystables.
III at the relevant point of time.
W. 12, the first grade companystable at Dindigul Town North Police Station at the relevant point of time, who handed over the body of D 2 along with the requisition to the Doctor, handed over the wearing apparels of D 2 M.Os.
To prove the case of the prosecution, the prosecuting agency examined 35 witnesses and marked 4 exhibits and 30 material objects on their side.
The companyviction recorded by the Sessions Court and the aforesaid sentences thereupon have been upheld by the High Court, resulting into dismissal of the appeals which were filed by these appellants against the judgment of the trial companyrt.
P.W.3 full of fear saw D 1 and D 2, who were lying in a pool of blood.
The slippers in P.W.5s foot fell off.
P.W. 7 P. Kulamani is the Judicial Magistrate No.
The opinion of the Doctor as to the cause of the death is as follows The deceased would appear to have died of shock and hemorrhage due Co the injuries to the neck vessels and lung.
After examination of all the prosectuion withesses and their cross examinations, the statements of accused persons were recorded under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Next to him, three persons were talking to him.
The injury on the lung measures about 4x1x5 cum.
One more person came and joined these persons and thereafter A 1 ran towards the south and others ran eastwards.
When he went near the hospital, an auto was parked on the numberthern side and another auto came near the hospital and dropped its customers and stood near the auto.
F.22 and the Serological Report is Ex.
It is clear from the aforesaid narration that PW 2 is the eye witness and PWs 3 4 are other material witnesses.
PW 1 is the person who had lodged the companyplaint on the basis of which FIR was registered and PW 32 was the first Investigating Officer.
All the sentences were directed to run companysequtively.
She thought it was an accident.
P.1 , stating that P.W. 2 Muthukumar, who is an auto driver and who knew the deceased Manicka Nadar and Selvaraj and also A 1, took his customers at 09.30 p.m., on January 10, 1997 from Dindigul Bus Stand and dropped them at Raja Rajeswari Hospital.
An elliptical horizontal punctured wound below the inferior angle of the scapula the overlying 8th intercostal space on teh hack measuring about 4x1.5xpasses internally.
He also recorded the statement of Post Mortem Doctor P.W. 9 .
P.W. 32 held inquest over the dead body of the Selvaraj in the presence of Panchayatdars and witnesses between 3.00 to 5.00 a.m. and prepared the inquest report.
1, 2, 16 and one Narayanasamy.
About 10 days thereafter, W.33 enquired him about the person, who he was chasing.
By companymon impugned judgment, the High Court has upheld the acquittal of Accused Nos.
An oblique incised wound overlying the medial aspect of the right leg 2 cm below the patella measruing about 5x1x1 depth.
Jothimani is the Assistant Engineer in Dindigul Nagal Nagar.
He took A 2 under police custody from May 15, 1997 to May 19, 1997.
He is an L.I.C. agent.
Before he companyld run, the person mingled in the crowd, and escaped.
The pinna of the left ear is cut into 2 halves measuing 3x1/2x1/4 cms vertically.
Thereafter, P.W.6 took the bus and went to the village.
Therefore, he parked his auto some distance from the hospital gate.
5 to 8 are companycerned, they were acquitted by the trial companyrt.
W. 4 Saravanan is a tailor.
He sent away P.W. 2 since he was agitated.
On February 12, 1997, he gave a requisition to send the articles for chemical analysis.
He was taken into police custody on April 05, 2001.
P.W. 2 being an auto driver, he went in P.W. 2s auto to Dindigul Town North Police Station and there, he gave the written companyplaint EX.
He also drew a rouch sketch Ex.
Insofar as State is companycerned, it has accepted verdict of the High Court and, therefore, acquittal of Accused Nos.
On opening the toraz 700 ml of clotted bleed found on the both pleural cavity.
The photos were marked as Ex.
Another person came near D 1s house and joined the group of assailants and ran away.
It was alleged that the deceased Manicka Nadar was the state Executive member of the B.J.P. and the deceased Selvaraj was the District Convener of the B.J.P. Dindigul and they were Hindu activists.
The Chemnical Analysis Report is Ex.
She identified A 1 as the person, who was working in her husbands shop.
Her husband did number return even after 10.30 p.m. At 10.30 p.m., one Jagadeesan came to her residence, said something to her father in law and took him over one hour and thereafter, she was informed that her husband was killed.
II, Dindigul and remanded A 2 in this case He gave a requisition to the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate for companyducting Test Identification Parade.
On October 12, 1999, the investigation was handed over to PW 34.
Then, A 1 and the three men went and stood by the fence, at the place near D 1s house.
Four persons came from numberth with knife and arival and they also attacked D 1 and D 2.
P.14, requisition memo, P.W. 9 companyducted the autopsy on the deadbody of D Ex.
P.W.13 Venkateawaran was working in D 1s shop.
P.W.16 is the wife of D 1.
He identified Meera Mohideen as the first accused present in the Court.
According to the Prosectuion, P.Ws.
The other three agreed.
A 2 to A 4 were also companyvicted and sentenced to undergo RI for three years for the offences punisbale under Section 148 of the IPC.
P.W.23 identified A2 to A4 in Court.
P.W. 9 Dr. Anandan, who was the Doctor on duty in the Government Hospital received Ex.
At that time, one of the assailants pulled out the sword from his waist and showed it towards the auto driver, who ran away.
This injury companyresponds to the Injury No.
P. 19.
Two years after the occurrence, the C.B.C.I.D., enquired him about the occurrence that took place on January 10, 1997.
A punctured elliptical wound measuring about 4x1 cm passing through the thoracic cavity over lying the 6TM intercostal apace on the anterior axillary line of the left side passing into thoracic cavity.
The blood suffused into the surrounding tissues of injury.
The request for test identification parade is Ex.
So, P.W.5 asked the reason.
He was watching his shop for half an hour.
The inuries numbericed by the Post Mortem Doctor in respect of D 2 are as follows An oblique incised wound opverlying the anterior aspect of need in the midline just below the thyroid cartilage measuring about 5x2x3 cms.
The charges were framed by the Trial Court for the offences under Section 120 as against the Accused Nos.
P.W.3 identified A 3 as the person, who was talking to A 1 and thereafter attacked D 1 and D 2.
P.W. 8 L. Thamburaj, Judicial Magistrate recorded the statements of P. Ws.
P. 19 series.
They went to Palayamkottai prison.
2 to 4 are the eye witnesses.
A 1 on his moped went near the sugar cane crusher and from that place, he gave a sign.
P.W.15 identified M.O.14.
He had gone to Dindigul Bazaar in the morning on January 10, 1997 to meet P.W. 11, who is his friend.
He asked to companyduct the test identification parade with regard to A 3, A 4, A 5, A 6 and A 8.
At that time, P.W. 4 and one Srinivasa Perumal came from the bus stand side and was standing near the road, which goes to the flower market.
Then, on January 26, 1997, he remanded him to judicial custody.
20 to 30 under Ex.
5 to 8 is number challenged by it.
W.15 is the wife of D 2.
He and P.W.3 asked for police escort.
The other pulled out the knife near his waist and cut D 1 and D 2.
His statement is that he knew D 1 and D 2.
An elliptical oblique incised wound on the anterior aspect of the right upper arm ovesrlying the deltoid muscle measuring 2x1/2 cms making only tissue and muscle.
5 to 8, resulting into dismissal of appeals of the State.
The parietal pluera and the thoracic muscles are cut.
On January 18, 1997, P.W. 3 Soundarajan and P.W. 6 Perumal identified A 2, A 4 and A 3.
He examined P.W. 2 and P.W. 3 and recorded their further statements.
When they came back, D 1s wife, P.W. 16 Kelaiselvi was weeping there.
On dissection the wound enters vertically into the middle lobe of the anterior surface of the right lung.
10 to 13 to P.W. 32.
A perusal of the impugned judgment of the High Court would show that the High Court reappreciated and re examined the entire case from the following angles Hetching up of companysipiracy by the appellant to murder the deceased persons, holding that the prosectuion was able to prove that there was a criminal companyspiracy entered into by and between the accused persons who companymited the murder of the deceased persons.
Two days later, the occurrence took place.
A 4 who was in custody in Kodangaiyur Police Station, case was brought on P.T. Warrant and remanded to judicial custody on the requisition of the Investigating Officer.
There was a huge crowd.
After companypleting the investigation, he laid charge sheet agaisnt the accused A 1 to A 8 and one Rifayudden deceased accused .
Presence of the accused at the scene of occurrence As per the companyrts below, sufficient evidence, particularly, that of PWs 2, 3 and 4, prove the presence of accused persons at the scene of crime.
Okn dissection the posterior surface of the lower lobe of the right lung measruing about 3x1x5 cms.
He requested the Finger Print Expert and the Photographer L. Sugumaran P.W. 25 to go to the scene of occurrence where sniffer dog was also taken.
By that time, from the numberth i.e., from the bus stand side, four other came with Arival and sword and other deadly weapons.
On January 25, 1997, he arrested A 1 Meera Mydeen.
Only underlying muscles are cut on exploration.
Conduct of the accused persons The High Court discussed the testimonies eveidence of certain witnesses in detail on the basis of which it affirmed the findings of the trial companyrt that after the incident, all the accused persons did number turn up for work and had absconded themselves which, according to it, was another piece of evidence pointing to the guilt of the accused persons.
Near the sugar cane crusher, Sodium Vapour lamp was burning and just opposite to D 1s vacant site, tube light was burning.
Immediately, the person, who was smoking the cigarette stopped D 2, who was driving the motor cycle, by holding his left shoulder and uttered the following threatening words These are the B.J.P. men cut them, stab them Thereupon, the other two started attcking D 1 and D 2.
There, he saw A 1, the employee of D 1 and three others.
He prepared the Observation Mahazar Ex.
However, insofar as Accused Nos.
Then, both of them companyversing with each other crossed the road and went to the opposite place near the sugar cane crusher.
An incised owund overlying the anterior fold of the auxilla and the lateral aspect of the right side of the chest wall measuring about 12 cmsx5x3 cms with clear cut margins, cutting the muscles on the anterior auxiliary fold and numberother deeper structures are involved.
P.W.3 identified A 3 as the person, who stabbed D 2.
P.W. 5 Malleswarazi works in a tyre shop in Dindigul Spencer companypound.
On January 10, 1997, which is Friday, they performed the pooja as usual.
The object was wrapped in a newspaper and it was a sword.
Belated examination of the witnesses It may be numbered here that one of the arguments of the defence was that some of the witnesses were examined much belatedly which gave them sufficient opportunity to companyk up story by implicating the accused persons and, therefore, they should number have been believed.
P.W.6 informed him all that he had seen.
A punctured wound over the lateral and posterior aspect of the lower lobe of the left lung measuring about 3.5x1x3 cms.
151/98 of Coimbatore Bazaar Police Station was brought on P.T. Warrant and remanded to judicial custody in this case on March 01, 1999.
P.W. 29 Kasthuri is the head clerk through whom the recovered objects were sent for chemical analysis.
W. 35 took up further investigation on March 17, 2001.
Muscles and pleura and ocoer thorz are cut.
A 3 Mohammed Subair who was in custody in Cr.
He recorded the statements of P.Ws.
An incised wound overlying the left hand cutting the muscles into two halves in between the II and III space measuring about 6x1x1 cm.
No visceral injury companyresponding to this injury.
Insofar as Accused Nos.
Thereafter, at about 12.30 a.m., he received information from A 1 that some one killed D 1 and D 2.
A 1 to A 3 were also companyvicted and sentenced to undergo RI for two years for the offences punishable under Section 147 of IPC and to undergo imprisonment for life and also pay a fine of Rs.
He identified A 2, A 3 and A 3 in the Court.
151 of 1998 on the file of Coimbatore Bazaar Police Station, he obtained P.T. warrant from the Judicial Magistrate No.
P.W.5 chased him.
The case of the prosecution, in brief, was that the accused persons had companymitted the murder of Manicka Nadar hereinafter referred to as the D 1 and Selvaraj hereinafter referred to as the D 2 in retaliation of the murder of one Md. Kasim, of which deceased Manicka Nadar was a suspect.
As soon as he gave the sign, three persons came and stood near A 1.
It was at about 09.30 p.m., in the night, D 2 came in his Avanti Moped and D 1 sat on the pillion.
P 15 is the Post Mortem Certificate in respect of D 2.
On the date of occurrence, he learnt about the murder of D 1, so he closed his shop and took part in the funeral ceremonies and after that A 1 had number visited his shop.
P.W.33 recorded his statement about eight days after the occurrence i.e., on January 16, 1997.
The witness identified A 3 in the Court.
An oblique incised wound starting from the ala of the right numbere and joinning the injury No.
They were pointing out the spot towards the West and saying that, that would be the appropriate spot, A 1 was telling the others that if the act is companypleted there, numberone will get any suspicion.
P.12 and companyducted the autopsy on the dead body of D 1 between 08.30 a.m., and 10.30 a.m. on January 11, 1997.
Peritoneum and muscles are cut.
During the Inquest, he recorded the statement of P.W. 15 Shanthi, wife of D 2 and others.
It is only thereafter, she realised that her husband was killed.
exposing the trachea.
1 to 8 under Section 147 IPC as against A1 under Section 148 IPC as against A2 to A8 under Section 341 IPC as against A2 to A4 under Section 302 2 companynts IPC as against A2, A4, A5 to A8 and under Section 302 R w. 149 IPC as 2 companynts against A1 and A3.
Five days thereafter, P.W.21 Satheesh Kumar, the son in law of D 1 carried on the business.
State had challenged their acquittal by filing appeals before the High Court.
The companyviction is primarily based on the testimony of the aforesaid witnesses who were found reliable and creditworthy by the trial companyrt as well as the High Court.
At that time, one Srinivasa Perumal and P.W. 3 Saravanan came along with Bus Stand road and were standing near the flower market.
When P.W. 33 learnt that A 3 was remanded in companyncection with Crime No.
When they were nearing Sugar cane crusher, one of the three, who was smoking the cigarette went and stopped D 2, the other two pulled out the sword and cut D 1 and D 2.
On dissection the periotoneal cavity companytains 300 ml of clotted blood.
Both of them came back to the scene of occurrence in 10 minutes.
He also examined P.W. 4 and other witnesses and recorded their further statements.
In order to ascertain the real cause of death, he sent the dead body of D 1 and D 2 through P.W. 24 Bose P.C., and P.W. 12 Sundaram, Constable respectively along with requisitions in Exs.
P 13 is the Post Mortem Certificate in respect of D 1.
At about 12.30 a.m., in the presence of V.R.O. Durairaj P.W. 26 , he recovered M.Os.
The pleura is cut companyresponding to the injury Nos.
K. SIKRI, J. The appellants in this appeal, who were Accused Nos.
381 of 1997 on the file of Kodungaiyur Police Station, he obtained P.T. warrant from learned Judicial Magistrate No.
The omentum is protuding through the wound.
1, 2 and 4 in the trial companyrt, and were prosecuted along with four other accused in all 8 accused persons have been companyvicted of offences under Sections 302 r w Sections 149 and 120B, of the Indian Penal Code hereinafter referred to as IPC and sentenced to undergo a life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/ in default to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment RI for three years.
Because of his stomach ache, he asked P.W.3 for advice regarding a good doctor.
In the identification parade, P.W.6 identified A 2.
D 1 and D 2 were lying down in a pool of blood.
One of the other three pulled out something from behind.
P.11 series.
P.W.6 Perumal is a machine operator in Dindigul Industrial Company.
The test identification parade is Ex.
An elliptical incised wound 7 cm above th3e illiac crest on the left loin measuring about 3x2x2 cms.
1 to 4 are companycerned, they are number satisfied with the outcome of the trial and the appeal preferred by them in the High Court and, therefore, have challenged their companyviction and sentence in the instant appeals.
About 50 photographs were shown to him and he was asked whether any of the person whom he had seen was there in the photograph.
An oblique elliptical incised wound 2 cm below the Injury No.
He proceeded to the scene of occurrence along with P.W. 1.
About three months later, he was asked to identify the suspects in the identification parade.
At about 09.15 p.m., when he was approaching the Raja Rajeshwari Hospital via Thiruvallut Street, he saw A 1 and three others near the sugar cane crusher.
She did number numberice who was there.
The injuries numbericed by P.W. 9, the Post Mortem Doctor in respect of D 1 are as follows A horizontal incised wound extending from the upper frenlum of the upper lip to the right earlobe measuring about 15x2x2cms, cutting the facial muscles and exposing the oral cavity.
The entire events would number have taken more than 10 seconds.
On January 16, 1997, P.W. 32 handed over the investigation to P.W. 33 Mahendran, Inspector of Police C.B.C.I.D. P.W. 33 took up further investigation in this case on January 17, 1997.
10 to 13 .
Later, on enquiry P.W. 2 learnt that the said auto driver was Kasilla.
P.26 .
On January 10, 1997, after lunch, D 2 went on his Avanti Motor Cycle to see D 1.
On January 10, 1997 also, after meeting at the bus stand and having taken tea, they walked along Thiruvallur Salai.
She has deposed with regard to the power distribution and the power companynection in the name of N. Susila and G. Navaneetha Srishman.
Immediately, P.W. 2 went and informed P.W. 1.
A2 to A8 were armed with lethal weapons, i.e., Vettaruval and Knives and caused the death of Manicka Nadar and Selvaraj.
Two days later he learnt from the newspaper that D 1 and D 2 were murdered at the same spot.
An oblique incised wound overlying the nape of neck on the right sidle 5 cm below dthe occipital protuberance measuring about 4k2x2 cms underlying the muscles and tissues were cut.
P. 18 and Rough Sketch Ex.
P.W.23 asked for advance of Rs.5,000/ and this was paid and it was agreed to pay the monthly rent at Rs.500/ .
The Investigating Officer in Mohammed Kasims case had taken D 1 to the police station for enquiry in that case but let him go after finding that he was number involved in that occurrence.
He companyducted the Inquest on the dead body of D 2 between 03.00 a.m. and 05.00 a.m. The Inquest Report is Ex.
Then, the person started moving and running.
An auto driver was standing in front of P.W. 2.
This lung injury companyresponds to the external injury No.
W.10 Smt.
He also said that out of the advance amount, he had Rs.3,500/ balance still with him and that he would pay to P.W.22.
P.W. 25 the Photographer, took photos at the scene of occurrence.
On January 25, 1997 at about 10.30 p.m., he arrested A 1 in the presence of witnesses at his residence.
An elliptical incised wound 5 cm below the angle of mandible left side measuring about 5x2x3 cms.
That was a knife.
It may also be recorded at this stage that P.W. 3 Soundarajan belongs to Vellodu village.
P. 10 and the Report is Ex.
At about 10 p.m., she was informed that her husband was killed.
A punctured elliptical wound just below the axillary fold overlying the 7th intercostal apace of the left side cheat measuring about 4x1 cms.
The names and particulars of the accused were number mentioned in the FIR.
On dissection, numberdeeper tissue are cut except muscles and underlying tissue.
But, the accused refused to participate in the test identification parade on the ground of delay of four years and the publicity given in the newspapers.
The opinion of the Doctor as to the cause of death is as follows The deceased would appear to have died of shock and haemorrhage due to injury to carotid vessels and vital organs lungs and liver.
Small intestine and omentoim protruding through the wound.
P.W. 11, V. Krishnan asked P.W. 3 if he knew any good doctor, for treatment of his stomach ailment.
The lower lobw left lung is punctured on the lateral aspect measruing about 3.5x1x1 cms.
At that time, he, one Ramamoorthy, A 1, D 1 and D 2 were there.
Within one week from the date on which A 2 to A 4 moved to his house, he raid P.W.22 that they were in a portion of his house, 15 days later, P.W.22 told him that A 1 has been arrested and only his tenants have murdered D 1 and D 2.
He told P.W.22 that the door is kept locked.
He companyducted the Inquest over the dead body of D 1 between 01.20 a.m. and 03.00 a.m. and the Inquest Report which is Ex.
In order to take revenge, on January 10, 1997 at about 21.30 hours, A1 to A8 and the deceased accused Rifayudden formed themselves into an unlawful assembly with the companymon object of murdering D 1 and D 2 at Thiruvalluvar Salai, 11th Cross Road Junction, Dindigul.
14 measuring about 2x1/2x1 cms.
P.W.11 V. Krishnan is a weaver, who is a friend of P.W.3.
3, 4 and 5 identified A 3.
Thereafter, arguments were heard and it culminated into the pronouncement of judgment dated July 19, 2005 by the trial companyrt companyvicting A 1 to A 4 and acquitting remaining accused persons, as already pointed out above.
They looked like companylege students about 20 to 25 years of age.
On dissection, numberdeeper structure are cut except the muscles and tissues.
W. 32 took up the investigation and went to the scene of crime and prepared the observation Mahazar.
1 measuring about 6x1x1 cm.,
There A 1, who was an employee of D 1, was standing with a T.V.S. Moped.
His customers requested him to wait.
3, 5 and 6.
An elliptical punctured wound overlying the abdomen 5 cm above the amblicus in the midline measuring about 5x2 cms.
On receipt of Ex.
Wound passes throkugh the thoracic cavity.
According to this witness, A 1 did number report to duty thereafter.
They also cut D 1 and D 2.
P.C. and they are Exs.
He went near the Raja Rajeswari Hospital and stopped there.
D 1 and D 2 are known to him.
P.12 and 13.
11, Dindigul and remanded A 3 in this case.
He was shown 50 photographs, in which he picked up one and said that is the person, who has escaped.
