It was Reason followed by the declaration under section 6 issued on 3.4.2000.
Possession was taken on 12.5.2000.
The award was passed on 3.4.2002.
The Government of NCT of Delhi provisionally regularised the companyony.
The purchasers then participated in the proceedings for the determination of companypensation under sections 9 and 10 of the 1894 Act.
Notification No.
The petitioners claimed that they companytinued in the actual physical possession of the land even after passing of the award on 17.09.2008 and the same formed part of the unauthorized companyony.
In the meanwhile, an unauthorized companyony came up with the name of Deep Vihar, Pansali, Pooth Kalan, Delhi.
The purchasers petitioners filed a writ petition at the High Court of Delhi.
The respondents never took the actual physical possession of the land as such, the acquisition has lapsed.
The Act of 2013 came in force from 1.1.2014.
Subsequently, the petitioners purchased the land on 5.7.2001 by way of Registered Sale Deed executed by one Satya Narain, the Power of Attorney holder of original owners.
F.10 29 /96/LB LA/11394, dated 27.10.1999, was issued for the acquisition of the land situated in the revenue estate of Village Pansali, Delhi, for the public purpose of the Rohini Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by NARENDRA PRASAD Date 2019.10.15 173650 IST Residential Scheme under planned development of Delhi.
ARUN MISHRA, J. The question involved in the matter is whether a purchaser of the property after issuance of numberification under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for short, the 1894 Act , can invoke the provisions companytained in section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for short, the Act of 2013 .
