Gurdev Singh, soon therefore, i.e. on 15 May, 1965, filed an application for restoration supported by an affidavit, attributing his absence on 4 May, 1965 to his illness.
The order dated 8 June, 1965 of the Additional Director, shows that the applicant Gurdev Singhs assertion that he companyld number attend due to illness, over which he had numbercontrol, was accepted by the Additional Director, who proceeded to exercise his powers under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1948 hereinafter referred to as the Act and to set right the grievance of the applicant, Gurdev Singh, after going into all the relevant records.
3, shows Gurdev Singh, who had some companyplaint against the Consolidation Scheme, was number present so that petition was ordered to be filed by the Additional Director, Consolidation on 4 May, 1965.
A perusal of that order, together with the earlier order of 4 May, 1965 and the application for restoration dated 15 May, 1965, filed by Gurdev Singh, respondent No.
H. Beg, C.J. This appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution is directed against a very detailed judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court on a Writ Petition No.
1875 of 1965 filed under Articles 226 227 of the Constitution, assailing an order of the Additional Director Consolidation of Holdings, passed on 8 June, 1965.
