Karnataka Lokayukta Bangalore to register a case U s. 13 1 e read with 13 2 of the P.C. Act, 1988 against Sri B Srinivas, Engineer in Chief, Rural Development Engineering Department, Bangalore and investigate the said case.
To D. Khalander Sd Police Inspector, Superintendent Police Wing, City Division, of Police, City Division, Bangalore Office of the Lokyukta Bangalore.
Application seeking permission to substitute additional grounds was filed in the year 2005.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows Search was companyducted in the house of the respondent on 15th/16th June, 2000 and certain records and documents were seized.
Therefore by virtue of the power vested in me, S.G. Ramesh Superintendent of Police, Police Wing City Division, Karnataka Lokayukta, Bangalore, order under the provisions of S.C. 17 of the Prevention of companyruption Act, 1988, Sri.
B. Srinivas at present working as Engineer in chief, Rural Development Engineering Department has acquired properties disproportionate to his known source of income to the extent of about Rs.
M.D. Khalander Presently working as police Inspector, Police Wing, City Division, Karnataka Lokayukta.
The basis for such stand was that numberreason had been indicated as to why it was entrusted to the Inspector.
The Superintendent of Police had authorized the Inspector of Police to companyduct investigation.
Ref Report of Sri.
At the relevant point of time the respondent was working as an Engineer in Chief of Rural Development Engineering Department, Bangalore.
When the petition was finally heard in the year 2006, second stand taken was that there was inordinate delay of 6 years in filing the charge sheet.
Documents relating to the respondent, his son in law, his daughter and son were seized.
Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court accepting the petition filed by the respondent under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in short the Code .
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
I have gone through the report of Sri.
Prayer in the petition was to quash the order dated 12.6.2000 passed by the Superintendent of Police, Karnataka Lokayuktha and investigation pursuant to the said order, including lodging of the first information report.
The High Court accepted both the stands and quashed the proceedings.
1,13,000,00/ and thereby companymitted offence U s. 13 12 e R W. 13 2 of the P.C. Act, 1988.
Further U W.18 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Sri.
Md. Khalander, presently working as Police Inspector, Police Wing City division, Karnataka Lokayukta, Bangalore relating to Inquiry report IE receipt of credible information that Sri.
From the materials placed before me with the application of my mind I am satisfied that a prima facie case is made against Sri B. Srinivas U s 13 1 e r w 13 2 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
M.D. Khalander Police Inspector, Police Wing City Dn.
