98 of 1998.
It came into force on 01.01.1975.
The appellant owned several acres of agriculture lands, which also included the suit land.
This litigation ended in appellants favour by the orders of the revisionary Court.
The sale deed, inter alia, recited that the appellant has also delivered possession of the suit land to the respondents.
Respondent No.
The Single Judge granted leave to the plaintiff as prayed.
This was under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 for short, the Act of 1971 wherein the issue was whose name the appellant or the respondents be entered in the Pass Book in relation to the suit land as Pattadar.
During the pendency of his case before the Tribunal, the appellant sold the suit land vide sale deed dated 16.07.1975 to the respondents.
826 total land 22 acres 76 cents situated in Agnigundala Village of Ipur Mandal, District Guntur Andhra Pradesh hereinafter referred to as the suit land .
Felt aggrieved, the defendants respondents filed first appeal before the High Court.
It was also companytended that the appellant is estopped from raising any companytention once he sold the suit land to the respondents and stake any claim over the suit land.
The Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1973 for short, the Act was enacted on 01.01.1973.
The appellant was, therefore, directed to surrender the excess land held by him in favour of the State as provided in the Act.
Heard Mr. V.V.S.Rao, learned senior companynsel for the appellant and Mr. B. Adinarayana Rao, learned senior companynsel for the respondents.
The Trial Court, on the basis of pleadings, framed two issues viz.,
By impugned judgment and order, the Single Judge of the High Court allowed the appeal and while setting aside the judgment decree of the Trial Court dismissed the suit.
It was companytended that the respondents on purchase of the suit land obtained the loan from S.B.I and mortgaged it with the Bank by way of security for the loan taken.
This is how this appeal is brought before this Court on the strength of the certificate granted by the High Court.
1 whether the plaintiff appellant is in lawful possession of the suit land and 2 whether the plaintiff appellant is entitled for injunction as prayed for?
436 and Ac.
The appellant being a person as defined under Section 3 o of the Act and was holding the land in excess of the limits prescribed under the Act filed a declaration in respect of his holding before the Tribunal as required under Section 7 of the Act.
98/1998 against the respondents before the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Narsaraopet out of which this appeal arises.
1 then mortgaged the suit land along with his other lands to the State Bank of India and obtained loan wherein the appellant had stood as the guarantor.
The appellant is the plaintiff whereas the respondents are the defendants in the civil suit out of which this appeal arises.
The subject matter of this appeal is an agriculture land measuring Ac.13.38 cents in Survey No.
9.38 cents in Survey No.
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. This appeal by certificate is filed by the plaintiff against the final judgment and order dated 28.10.2011 of the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Appeal Suit No.4141 of 2003 whereby the High Court allowed the appeal preferred by the defendants respondents herein and reversed the final judgment and decree dated 22.09.2003 of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Narasaraopet in Original Suit No.
