From the Judgment and Order dated 23 7 73 of the Patna High Court in C.W.J.C. No.
Santokh Singh for Respondent No,.
C. Prasad and U. P. Singh for Respondent Nos.
The appellant challenged the award by filing a Writ Petition in the High Court, which was dismissed on July 23, 1973.
At the instance of the Management, a certificate of fitness was granted by the High Court on February 22, 1974.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
On the raising of an industrial dispute, it was referred for adjudication by the Government of Bihar to the Labour Court, Patna, respondent number 1 by a 10 48 numberification dated the 6th/17th February, 1968.
At the domestic inquiry held by the Management, he was found guilty and eventually dismissed from service on June 9, 1966.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by UNTWALIA J. This appeal on certificate granted by the Patna High Court under Article 133 1 of the Constitution of India as it stands after the 30th Constitution Amendment Act is by the Management of the Monghyr Factory of India Tobacco Company Limited impleading the Labour Union as respondent number 2 and the companycerned workman as respondent number 3.
B. Pai, O. C. Mathur and K. J. John for the Appellant.
A chargesheet was served on him by the Management on May 24.
864 of 1974.
We were also informed by the management that respondent number 3 has superannuated, according to them in December, 1972.
1 and 4.
Respondent number 3 was working as an operator on a packing machine in the appellants factory at Monghyr on May 21, 1966 when he is said to have companymitted certain acts of misconduct.
The State of Bihar is respondent number 4.
The Labour Court made an award on November 23, 1970 ordering reinstatement of the workman Shri Ram Krishan Pathak, respondent number 3, with III his back wages from the date of dismissal till the date of reinstatement.
31 of 1971.
