On 23.2.2004, the High Court companymences the training of the last 20 candidates in the select list.
Training Probation Tests.
has been actually practising an an Court since and that his her character and companyduct are were Station Signature,Name Designation Date of the presiding Officer Pursuant to the above Notification, the appellants petitioners herein submitted their applications.
425 of 2004 to the effect that the appointments, if any, will be subject to the result of the original petition.
Aggrieved against the judgment dated 1.3.2005 in Writ appeal No.
The select list was issued by the High Court on 7.2.2002.
Oral Examination There shall be an oral examination carrying a maximum of 50 marks for deciding the candidates general knowledge, grasp of general principles of law, analytical ability and suitability for appointment as Munsif Magistrate.
who are affected by the judgment had themselves filed W.A.Nos.
Candidates occupying Rank Nos.
The High Court filed Writ Appeal No.
60 etc.
The appellant preferred Special Leave Petition c No.17535 of 2004 before this Court against the interim order dated 12.8.2004.
1584 of 2004 and O.P. No.
Scheme of written and oral examinations Written examination The written examination shall companysist of the following four papers carrying a maximum of 100 marks each.
Certificates Documents i ii .
All these appeals filed by the High Court and by these parties were allowed setting aside the judgment of the learned single Judge.
However, Mr. Siraj has chosen to file appeals only against the decision in W.A.No.
Fraction of half or more than half shall be regarded as full mark and less than half shall be ignored.
1584 of 2004 filed by himself and has number chosen to file any appeal against the decision in the other appeals, W.A.No.
The learned Judges in paragraph 50 of their judgment observed as under .The companypilation of records are immediately done, and at every stage, the senior Judges including the Chief Justice, who were in office, had been closely monitoring the selection process.
The time for each paper shall be two and a half hours.
3377 3378 OF 2005 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION C NOS.
On the other hand, the High Court set aside the selection of candidates occupying Rank Nos.
Mr. C.T. Sivanandan and Mr. Shahjahan M. are the appellants in Civil appeal Nos.
14140 14141 OF 2005 Dr. AR.
Note Feeder categories of offers for recruitment by transfer i ii iii iv v vi vii viii .
The relevant part of the Notification reads as under THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA No.
This Court on 25.8.2004 issued numberice and stayed the operation of the impugned order.
1498, 1510, 1526, 1527, 1541, 1588 and 1574 of 2004.
1496/2004 filed by the High Court and W.A. No.
60, 62, 64, 66, 68, and 70.
Mr. K.H. Siraj himself filed W.A. No.1584 of 2004 against that part of the impugned judgment which was against him.
This Court disposed of the above special leave petition on 1.11.2004 after recording the statement of the companynsel for the respondents.
Recruitment by transfer.
The learned single Judge passed an order on 16.1.2004 in I.A.No.
Age limit i Direct recruitment Note.
60,62,64,66,68 and 70 in the select list from open merit candidates as illegal and companysequently restrained respondent Nos.
filed by the affected parties.
WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS.
Only candidates who secure number less than 35 per cent marks in each of the papers of the written examination with an overall minimum of 45 per cent of the total marks of written examination and 30 per cent of the marks for the oral examination shall be eligible for appointment provided that the minimum marks required for pass in each paper of the written examination shall be 30 per cent with an overall minimum of 35 per cent of the total marks for candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes.
The marks secured by the candidates at the oral examination shall be added to the total marks secured by them at the written examination and the names of all those candidates shall be arranged in the respective lists on the basis of the total marks secured by them.
Thereafter they were called for an interview to appear before the Board companysisting of five Honble Judges including Honble the Chief Justice on 17.12.2001.
The written examination shall be held on 11th and 12th August, 2001.
The Division Bench by its interim order dated 12.8.2004 admitted the appeal and stayed the order of the learned single Judge.
1498 of 2004 etc.
Certified that Shri Smt.
3377 3378 of 2005.
The short facts are as follows The High Court of Kerala by its Notification dated 26.3.2001 invited applications for the appointment to the post of Munsiff Magistrate in the Kerala Judicial Services in the pay scale of Rs.2500 4000.
6784 of 2002 of the High Court of Keraka, they filed the above appeals by which the Division Bench set aside the judgment of the learned single Judge.
Application form and application fee .
1496 of 2004 before the Division Bench.
2539 2540 of 2005.
14140 14141 of 2005 were filed by Mr. V.R. Manu Manaswini against the companymon impugned judgment dated 1.3.2005 passed in W.A.No.1497 of 2004 and W.A.No.1719 of 2004 whereby the Division Bench by its final order allowed Writ Appeal No.
The High Court preferred the appeal being W.A.No.1496 of 2004 on 9.8.2004 against the judgment of the learned single Judge.
The appellants filed writ petition praying for quashing the select list insofar as it is companytrary to the principles and Rules relating to reservations.
Paper II Paper III Paper IV.
The learned single Judge, by his order dated 6.8.2004, disposed of the original petition declaring that the decision to fill up the candidates appearing in S.Nos.
1497 of 2004 filed by the High Court of Keralal and dismissed Writ Appeal No.
Special Leave Petition c Nos.
The details of marks awarded in the written and oral examinations were available, as arising from the selection process.
1 2 High Court of Kerala and State of Kerala from filling up the above posts from the select list.
Lakshmanan, J. Mr. K.H. Siraj is the appellant in Civil appeal Nos.
Qualifications Direct recruitment.
They also moved an application for stay to stay the training and appointment of candidates from the select list till the disposal of the writ petition.
Aggrieved against the judgment and final order dated 1.3.2005 passed by the High Court of Kerala in Writ Appeal Nos.
Paper I .
1719 of 2004 filed by the appellant herein Mr. V.R. Manu Manaswini.
1496 1584 of 2004 whereby the Division Bench by its judgment and order allowed the appeals filed by the respondent High Court of Kerala, set aside the judgment of the learned single Judge and held that the selections and appointments made were regular in all respects.
Details of candidates with permissible amount of secrecy and the marks respectively secured by them were available, under the signature of the Chief Justice and his companypanion Judges.
ii Reservation of appointment The Rules relating to reservation of appointment for Backward Classes, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes companytained in Part II of the Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1958 Rules 14 to 17 shall apply to appointment by direct recruitment.
