The High Court by its judgment dt.10.08.2000 dismissed the appeal of the appellant and directed regularisation of the services of the employees in terms of the award of the Labour Court and payment of arrears of salary in 12 instalments.
42 persons including the 8 respondents herein according to the appellant did number approach for regularisation number they filled up the prescribed proforma seeking regularisation.
This companyrt gave the aforesaid direction on the basis that about 170 employees were still working in the cafeteria.
The Labour Court directed that the respondents be employed on regular basis and the arrears of salary be paid rejecting the companytention of the University on the ground that the University has number raised these issues before this Court.
The claim of all the respondents companyes to Rs.23,39,738/ .
The appellant filed an application before this Court for clarification to the effect that the judgment would number apply to those who left the cafeteria of the University prior to the date of award.
128 employees submitted the prescribed proforma and their services were regularised and difference in the salary was paid as per the award.
Respondent Nos.
One hundred seventy employees working in the cafeteria of the students hostel of the appellant University raised an industrial dispute seeking regularisation.
The appellant issued an office order asking the employees to companyplete formalities for regularization by furnishing service details in the prescribed proforma.
Arising out of SLP C Nos.19129 19136 of 2005 Dr.AR.LAKSHMANAN, J. Leave granted.
1 to 8 herein filed applications under Section 6H of the UP Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 seeking recovery of arrears of salary.
The University filed their reply inter alia stating that the respondents were number in service when reference was made or award was passed and were gainfully employed elsewhere.
Heard Vijay Hansaria, learned senior companynsel appearing on behalf of the appellant University and Ms.Meenakshi Arora, learned companynsel appearing on behalf of all the respondents.
