The High Court, by adverting to the facts in I.D. No.
The above appeal is directed against the order dated 08.08.2005 whereby the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad allowed the batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India Ministry of Telecommunication, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and quashed the award passed by the Tribunal cum Labour Court.
Though the Tribunal cum Labour Court passed a separate but identical order holding that the termination of services of the workmen companycerned are void and ordered reinstatement with full back wages, the Union of India and Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited challenged the same before the High Court by filing separate writ petitions.
Similar awards have been passed in respect of others.
We heard Mr. Amit Kumar, learned companynsel for the appellants and Mr. R.D. Agrawala, learned senior companynsel for the respondents.
6174 OF 2006 Sathasivam, J. Leave granted.
In the writ petitions filed by the Union of India and BSNL, the High Court mainly relying on the assertion of the Department that companytract with Security Agency M s Security and Protection Services, Varanasi was extended from time to time till 31.5.1999 and finding that the workmen companycerned were number employees of the Telecommunication Department quashed the award of the Tribunal.
39 of 2001, namely, Shri Brijbhushan Yadav vs. The General Manager, Telecom Department, accepted the stand of the department and quashed the award therein.
4264 OF 2007 Arising out of SLP C No.
CIVIL APPEAL NO.
Similar orders have been passed in all other companynected writ petitions.
The workmen who secured an award for reinstatement with full back wages at the hands of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Lucknow in short Tribunal cum Labour Court and lost before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad are the appellants before this Court.
