The High Court proceeded on the basis that there was in fact a flat allotted to the appellants son which has already been taken possession of by the son and since there is numbermention of the availability of such a flat in the body of the pleadings, the petition ought to be rejected by reason of companycealment of material facts and hence the appeal before this Court.
In my companysidered opinion, Petitioner 1 is guilty of companycealment of residential accommodation owned by his son at Pooja Apartments, Patparganj, Delhi.
This appeal is directed against an order of rejection of the civil revision petition by the High Court of Delhi, wherein the High Court categorically came to the companyclusion that the appellant is guilty of companycealment of material facts.
Incidentally, the appellant sought eviction of the respondent tenant on the ground that he required the tenanted premises bona fide for his residence and for the residence of his son.
Leave granted.
