Section 129 of the Tenancy Act of 1958 is as follows Nothing in the foregoing provision except section 2, the provision of Chapter II excluding sections 21,22,23, 24 and 37 and section 91 and the provisions of Chapters X and XII in so far as the provisions of the said Chapters are applicable to any of the matters referred to in sections mentioned above shall apply a b to lands which are the property of a trust trust for an educational purpose, hospital Panjarpole, Gaushata, or an institution for public religious worship, provided the entire income of such lands is appropriated for the purpose of such trust and c d Explanation For the purpose of clause b , a certificate granted by the Collector after holding an inquiry, that the companyditions mentioned in the said clause are satisfies by the trust shall be the companyclusive evidence in that behalf Each of these trusts have been granted a certificate by the Collector under the Explanation to Section 129 of the Tenancy Act of 1956.
On the death of the tenant, the appellants filed an application for summary eviction of the respondents under Section 120 of the Tenancy Act of l98.
The appellants companytended that o the death of the tenant, the tenancy came to an end and they were entitled to obtain possession of the lands.
This decision was challenged by the appellants by filing a writ petition before the High Court.
All these institutions are companyered by Section 129 b of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Vidarbha Region Act, 1958 hereinafter referred to as the Tenancy Act of 1958 .
The respondents in each of the appeals and or their predecessors in title were tenants in respects of the lands belonging to the appellants.
This has led to the filing of the present appeals.
In these proceedings, ultimately the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in revision held that the tenant of the appellants trust had number become a statutory purchaser under the Tenancy Act of 1958.
The entire income from the lands belonging to each of these institutions is appropriated by it for the purposes of the trust.
However, the heirs of the deceased tenant were entitled to succeed to the tenancy.
Hence the revision application of the appellants was dismissed.
