Respondent number2, Manisha Poddar filed a companyplaint on 08.07.2007 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi under sections 498 A, 406, 341, 323 and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code read with sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against all immediate relations of her husband, namely, Pyarelal Poddar father in law , Kamal Poddar husband , Sushila Devi mother in law , Gaurav Poddar unmarried brother in law and Preeti Gupta Preeti Agrawal married sister in law .
Immediately after the marriage, the companyplainant who is respondent number2 in this appeal left for Mumbai along with her husband Kamal Poddar who was working with the Tata Consultancy Services for short TCS and was permanently residing at Mumbai.
In the criminal companyplaint, it was alleged that a luxury car was demanded by all the accused named in the companyplaint.
Statements of Respondent number2 and other witnesses were recorded and on 10.10.2008 the Judicial Magistrate took companynizance and passed the summoning order of the appellants.
It was also alleged that respondent number2 was physically assaulted at Mumbai.
The companyplaint was transferred to the companyrt of the Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi.
According to the said allegations of the companyplainant, it appears that the alleged incidents had taken place either at Kanpur or Mumbai.
After staying there for a week, she returned to Mumbai on 24.03.2007.
The appellants are aggrieved by the said summoning order.
