CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.3373 OF 1984 Appeal by Special leave from the Judgment and Order dated the 9th July, 1980 of the Patna High in Court in C.R. No.
The appellants filed a revision application in the High Court of Patna against the order of the District Court.
The appeal filed against the order of interim injunction was dismissed by the learned Additional District Judge VI, Patna.
The learned Judge adjourned the case to July 9, 1980.
So much was enough litigative wastefulness.
On July 9, Shri Bindeswari Chaudhury did number press the revision application saying that he would rather return the papers to his clients.
But a litigation, once begun, has to run its full companyrse, particularly when it is believed that what is involved is prestige and so called principles.
The revision application came up for hearing before Justice S.K. Jha on July 3, 1980 when Shri Bindeswari Chaudhury, Advocate, who appeared for the appellants asked for an adjournment.
It is alleged that the appellants told Shri Sailendra Kumar Jha that the case was number ready for hearing and that it was number even on the monthly cause list.
That suit was instituted by respondent 1, who claims.
On July 8, the appellants engaged Justice S.K. Jhas advocate son Shri Sailendra Kumar Jha to appear for them.
He filed an application in the suit for an injunction restraining the appellants and respondent 3 from interfering with the working of the Society.
That application was allowed by the trial Court.
1655/77 N. Mukherjee and N.R. Choudhary for the Appellants P. Singh for the Respondent The Judgment of the Court was delivered by CHANDRACHUD, C.J. Special Leave granted limited to the question of the propriety of briefing a son to appear before his father.
