The said appeal was preferred by the respondents who were companyvicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar on April 23, 1979, in Sessions Trial No.11/79 on a charge under Section 306 of the I.P.C. The accused Kuldip Singh and his son Gurdip Kumar and his wife Darshan Kaur were companyvicted under Section 306 I.P.C. by the learned Additional Sessions Judge.
Kuldip Singh and Gurdip Kumar were sentenced to four years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.
It has been indicated by the High Court that the said letters were written from April 4, 1978 to July 27, 1978 and the letter of July 27, was written by the deceased just a day before the said incident of burning.
604/79 since preferred by the accused respondent, however, did number agree with the finding made by the learned Additional Sessions Judge.
Relying on the evidences given by the mother, aunt and companysin and the said Madhuban PW 6, learned Additional Sessions Judge held that all the said accused were guilty of the offence under Section 306 I.P.C. and accordingly they are companyvicted and sentenced as indicated hereinbefore.
919 of 1981 is directed against the judgment dated May 29, 1981 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Appeal No.604/79.
272 of 1982 O R D E R Criminal Appeal No.
With Criminal Appeal No.
The learned Additional Sessions Judge also came to the finding that demand of dowry had been made by the accused and the little girl felt humiliated because of the taunts given to her and harsh treatment meted out to her.
