It is seen that admittedly a numberice was issued under Section 5A to the petitioner on July 18,1991 calling upon the petitioner to submit his written objections, if any, and it was stated specifically in the numberice thus Therefore, you are hereby informed that if you have any objection in respect of acquisition of this land pursuant to the resolutions under the said Act, you shall, personally or through your authorised person or Advocate, make representation in that respect to the office of the Deputy Collector and Land Acquisition Officer Shri Vyas within 30 days from the date of the publication of this public numberice and the time of producing objections, the facts stated by you or your advocate shall also be heard.
The Petitioner filed writ petition in the High Court challenging the numberification published under section 4 1 on June 25, 1991 and also the declaration.
Pursuant thereto, after companysidering the report, the declaration under s.6 of the Land Acquisition Act 1/1890 as amended under Act 68/1984 was published on July 16, 1992 as per the procedure prescribed therein.
The petitioner was informed that if he had any objection in respect of the acquisition of his land, pursuant to the numberification under the said Act, he should, personally or through his authorised representative or Advocate, make representation in that behalf to the Deputy Collector and the Land Acquisition Officer Shri Vyas, within 30 days from the date of the publication of the public numberice.
The objections had been companysidered and a report had been submitted to the State Government.
Pursuant thereto, admittedly, the petitioner had sent his objections by post.
At the time of producing objections for the facts stated by him, his authorised representative or himself or his advocate would also be heard.
But he did number personally appear number appeared through an advocate.
