It is alleged that the vehicle was owned by one Ramchandran.
NLV 12.
Aggrieved against the order dated 25th June, 1993 an appeal was preferred by the claimants before the High Court and the High Court held that it is wrong to say that the insurance companypanys liability is to the extent of Rs.50,000/ only but insurance companypany is liable for the entire amount.
Aggrieved against this order the present appeal was filed by the insurance companypany.
This appeal is directed against the order passed by the Gauhati High Court dated 28th March, 2000 in M.A. F No.4 of 1994 whereby the learned Single Judge has held that the Claims Tribunal has gone wrong in number holding the insurance companypany liable for the full amount of companypensation claimed by claimant and it has companyfined the liability to the extent of Rs.50,000/ only.
Therefore, the claimants i.e. mother and brother of the deceased Kalita filed a claim petition 2 before the MACT, Gauhati as legal heirs of the deceased, claiming a sum of Rs.1,80,000/ .
It is alleged that on 20th November, 1987 Dambarudhar Kalita was driving his autorickshaw when he was hit by Omni bus bearing registration No.
Aggrieved against the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 28th March, 2000 the present appeal was filed.
He sustained serious injuries and was removed to the hospital where he succumbed to his injuries.
The objection of the appellant insurance companypany was that their liability is to the extent of Rs.50,000/ only.
