By special leave, this appeal has been filed in this companyrt.
Jinasenan, N. Jothi, K.K. Mani, K.V. Vishwanathan, Vikas Pahwa, K.V. Vijayakumar, S.N. Bhat, Manoj Wad, V.K. Verma, Advs.,
The appellant took the matter in a writ appeal by a detailed order, was dismissed at the stage of admission itself.
with them for the appearing parties.
Leave Grated, This appeal is directed against the judgement and order of the High Court dated 28th March, 1996 in writ Appeal number329 of 1996.
A learned Single Judge of the High Court after detailed discussion dismissed the writ petition.
O R D E R The following order of the Court was delivered.
Summons were issued by the respondent to appellant under Section 40 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 hereinafter called as FERA to appear before him on the fixed date.
After putting in certain companyditions for his appearance, the appellant appeared before the respondent on 15th May, 1996 when his statement was recorded.
His statements were also recorded on 9th July, 1996 and July 12th.
The appellant filed a writ petition in the High Court challenging the issuance of summons to him and in the writ petition precise grievance made was that the appellant cannot be companypelled to give his statement in writing in companynection with an offence under FERA.
