The companyplaint filed by the appellant was disposed of by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bihar for short, the State Commission vide its order dated 6th July, 1995 whereby the Board was directed to pay interest on the amount of Rs.35,530/ 18 per annum from the date of deposit till the delivery of possession of the plot.
By an order dated 8th February, 1996, the National Commission declined to stay the award of interest, but directed that the payment of Rs.30,000/ as companypensation will number be enforced till disposal of the appeal, if the Board pays a sum of Rs.15,000/ within one month along with interest.
The Board challenged that order by filing an appeal before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for short, the National Commission which was registered as 2/ 2 First Appeal No.
Heard the appellant, who has appeared in person.
The Board has number filed reply to companytrovert this assertion.
As the Board failed to companyply with the aforesaid interim order, the National Commission by its order dated 29th November, 2001, dismissed the appeal.
The National Commission reduced the rate of interest from 18 to 5 albeit without assigning any reason.
After thirteen years, he was informed about allotment of plot measuring 1825 sq.
Thereafter, the appellant filed an application for modification of order dated 4th July, 2005.
In response to an advertisement issued by the respondent Bihar State Housing Board for short, the Board , in 1978, the appellant deposited a sum of Rs.5,000/ for allotment of a plot.
The same was dismissed by the National Commission vide its order dated 11th August, 2006.
The Board was also directed to pay Rs.30,000/ by way of companypensation and Rs.1,000/ towards litigation companyt.
Hence, this appeal by special leave.
This was the categorical position taken by him before the State Commission.
After remand, the National Commission passed the impugned order wherein it came to be recorded that the appellant made a statement that he was number interested in the allotment of plot.
The appellant deposited the required amount on 28.10.1991, but possession of the plot was number given to him.
That order was set aside by this Court in C.A. No.2304 of 2004 and the National Commission was directed to dispose of the appeal on merits in accordance with law.
A perusal of the record shows that the appellant has been companytinuously making companyplaint regarding number delivery of possession of the plot.
Leave granted.
In the special leave petition, he made a specific grievance that he did number make any statement before the National Commission that he was 3/ 3 number interested in taking possession of the plot.
On 2.1.2006, this Court, after taking numbere of the statement made by the appellant that he is very much interested in the plot because at the age of 76 years he has numbershelter, directed him to approach the National Commission by filing appropriate application.
494/1995.
and was asked to deposit Rs.35,530/ .
