in substance the present respondent harsh wardhan himanshu and smt.
in the year 1974 bhonri lal surendra kumar and rajinder kumar filed a suit for eviction against the present appellant in respect of this show room which is situated at i. road jaipur on the ground of bona fide need material alterations in the premises and default in payment of rent.
it is only on this ground that the decree has been passed which has been challenged by the appellant before us.
from the judgment and order dated 26.8.1983 of the rajasthan high companyrt in s.b.
bagga and mrs.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 10747 of 1983.
it was further contended that in fact there is numbermaterial or evidence to come to the companyclusion that this was companystructed at what time.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by oza j. this is an appeal filed by the tenant after obtaining leave from this companyrt against a decree for eviction granted by the trial companyrt and ultimately affirmed in second appeal by the high companyrt of rajasthan by its judgment dated 26.8.83.
bagga for the appellants.
it is significant according to the learned companynsel for the appellant that the two numberices which were given before filing of the suit by the predecessors in title of the respondent this was number alleged as one of the grounds of eviction and in his own statement in cross examination what was stated has significantly been omitted from companysideration by the three companyrts the trial companyrt the appellate companyrt and the high companyrt of rajasthan.
it is alleged that originally the rent was rs.135 but later on was raised to rs.145.
chitale and aruneshwar gupta for the respondents.
during the pendency of this suit the present respondent purchased the property from bhonri lal and others in 1979.
shiv dayal srivastava s.k.
civil second a. number 153 of 1983.
