3.8.1987.
How, clumsily the petitioner is treated by the Respondents, immediately they got the writ petition dismissed by this Court on 8th May, 1987, since becomes apparent from the numberice dated 3rd August, 1987 issued to her, that numberice is excerpted in full, thus GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Rajasthan Atomic Power Station Plant Site, Anushakti P.O. No.
3 Aug., 1987 NOTICE Whereas implementation of the decision of Government of India, Department of Atomic Energy to close the Rajasthan Atomic Power Station Higher Secondary English Medium School in 1981 had been kept in abeyance following the stay order passed by the Honble Supreme Court on 14.5.1981 Whereas aforesaid stay and other interim orders were vacated by the Honble Supreme Courts decision of 8 5 1987, in view of DAE.s letter No.
II dated 27.7.1984, the existing teaching and number teaching staff were advised to make their applications through RAPS by 25.7.1987 for employment in the Atomic Energy Education Society And whereas, the RAPS Higher Secondary English Medium School is closed w.e.f.
085745 dated 3 8 87 for Rs.
2/10 24 /87 PP/1084 dated 25.5.1987 that the RAPS Higher Secondary English Medium School would be closed w.e.f.
II dated 27th July, 1984 of the Govt.
16044 of 1984.
The Civil Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly.
Thereafter, another order was made by this Court on 6th September, 1988 which read Having companysidered the facts and the circumstances of the case we had requested the learned Additional Solicitor General to look into this matter and to see if any appropriate chance for reconsideration of the case of the petitioners companyld be arranged for.
She may companylect her companypensation as per rules from Pay Accounts Officer, Rajasthan Atomic Power Station, during working hours any time after 6 8 1987 onwards.
The Central Government desired that the RAPP School which was run by the Department of Atomic Energy should be transferred to the AEE Society, so as to enable the latter to run it independently of the Department of Atomic Energy, with its readiness to meet the whole expenditure to be incurred by the AEE Society in running that school.
1470 of 1981 filed in this Court, apprehending retrenchment of existing RAPP School teachers by the AEE Society, in the event of the desired transfer taking place.
RAPS/09000/OM/87/S/900 Dt.
The petitioner was a teacher in the RAPP School ever since the year 1972 and had been in the year 1983 duly selected and promoted as Trained Graduate Teacher.
a 6 from the date of receipt of those benefits till the date of refund of the amount of AEES either in lumpsum or in monthly instalments number exceeding thirty six and companynt the service rendered in RAPP School for pension under AEEA.
Cheque No.
of India, Department of Atomic Energy this writ petition has become infructuous.
Non fulfilment of the assurance companytained in the letter dated 27th July, 1984 on the footing of which this Court dismissed the main writ petition resulting in dismissal of other writ petitions including that of the writ petitioner Smt.
The petitioner was a teacher who got impleaded in that writ petition and was treated as a writ petitioner in W.P. C No.
II of 27.7.1984 Whereas the Department of Atomic Energy had informed the Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi, vide their letter No.
When the main writ petition along with the other writ petitions were heard by this Court and had to be decided, an opportunity was afforded by this Court to the Respondents, as desired by them, to have the matter amicably settled with the teachers and other employees of the RAPP School.
16044 of 1984 W.P. No.
Whereas the Department of Atomic Energy had also submitted numberice for permission of closure vide their letter No.
The material portion of that letter read WHEREAS the matter has been re examined and reconsidered by the respondents No.
Again, on 25 4 1988, subsequent Contempt Petitions filed by the teachers against the Respondents having companye up for orders before this Court, they were disposed of because of the undertaking of Mr. G. Ramaswamy, the then additional Solicitor General that Respondents 4 and 5 will absorb all the five petitioners on the footing of others.
Three months wages as applicable in lieu of numberice period is hereby offered and paid to her.
Her service record was unquestionable.
AEES A 1.46 89/2573 dated 20.3.1989 wherein the Ex teachers of the RAPP Higher Secondary E.M. School, Ravat Bhata who were retrenched from service on the closure of the school, were requested to exercise their option either to retain the retrenchment and other terminal benefits received at on their retrenchment from RAPP School, in which even their past service in RAPP School will number companynt for pension under AEES, or b to refund the retrenchment and other terminal benefits received by them at the time of their retrenchment from RAPP administration with interest thereon.
Nirmal Bhalla is said to have led her to make several attempts in this Court and outside, to ensure fulfilment of that assurance but in vain.
He has assured the Court, having looked into the matter, though there was perhaps numberlegal infirmity in the process followed for selection of the petitioners by the respondents will give to the petitioners another reasonable opportunity at such date which will be intimated to the companynsel for the petitioners so that the petitioners can appear for interview again according to the numberms of the Selection Committee.
With numberalternative left, she is said to have made the present application praying for issue of a direction to Respondents to fulfil the assurance of her absorption in service of the AEE Society Schools, which are run by the AEE Society.
6216.00 Smt.
1 to 5 in the said writ petition, and WHEREAS the said respondents earnestly desire to help find a reasonable companypromise of the said writ, I, S.K. Bhandarkar, Joint Secretary to the Government of India, in the Department of Atomic Energy on behalf of respondent No.
1470 of 1981 by the petitioner therein Smt.
However, that undertaking when was recalled by this Court by its Order dated 10th May, 1988, Respondents authorities were asked to companysider the cases of five petitioners including the petitioner for absorption.
25.7.1987.
Nirmal Bhalla designation T.G.T. is hereby given this numberice that her services shall stand terminated w.e.f.
The desired transfer of the RAPP School to the AEE Society came to be questioned by one of the teachers of the RAPP School in Writ Petition C No.
1 of 1991 filed in W.P.No.
Sd V. Nadkarny Chief Superintendent Enclos.
II dated 27th July, 1984 sent by the Joint Secretary to the Government of India, to Respondents learned Counsel, was placed for companysideration of this Court.
Venkatachala, J. In this application, IA No.
The material facts and circumstances which form the basis of petitioners application warrant mention, at the outset.
Thereafter, letter No.
Nirmal Bhalla, C.T. Through Principal, RAPS Hr.
3.8.1987 Now, therefore, Smt.
Respondent 6 the AEE Society was in numbermood to fulfill the assurance of the Respondents companytained in the letter dated 27th July, 1984 placed before this Court leading to the dismissal of the writ petition and subsequent orders made by this Court, becomes obvious from its Chief Administrative Officers letter dated 4th August, 1989 which reads Reference is invited to this office circular No.
