292/8/ as rent from October 1, 1960 to June 30, 1961.
2/8/ .
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated March 18, 1964 of the Punjab High Court in Civil Revision No.
7/ as interest and Rs.
It appears that the tenant had made two deposits in the Court of the Senior Sub Judge, Ludhiana under s. 31 of the East Punjab Relief of Indebtedness Act, 1934 on December 23, 1959 and July 18, 1960, the amount being 210/ on each occasion.
499 of 1966.
The rent of the premises was Rs.
750 of 1962.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by.
The Rent Controller, by his order, decided that the tenant was number in default and the Appellate Authority and the High Court also took the same view.
Bishan Narain and Naunit Lal, for the appellant.
These amounts were accepted by the landlord without prejudice to his claim that the rent for the earlier period had number been paid.
He also paid Rs.
Janardan Sharma and S. K. Nandy, for the intervener.
In the present case the same cannot be said of the appellant.
N. Keswani, for the respondent.
Hidayatullah, C.J. This is a landlords appeal against an order of the High Court of Punjab, March 18, 1964, companyfirming the dismissal of his petition for the eviction of the respondent from certain premises taken on rent.
25/ as companyts.
The appellant had made the application under S. 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 on the allegation that rent for the premises from October 1, 1959 to June 30, 1961 had number been paid.
32/8/ and the water companynection charges were Rs.
On the first date of hearing the tenant appeared and tendered Rs.
