P.C. by the appellant.
After the application filed by respondent No.1 for execution of the order was rejected, respondent No.1 filed an application for recall the order dated 06.05.2017 on 31.07.2018.
P.C. be restored and decided on merits after hearing the parties.
The learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court by order dated 05.01.2019 set aside the order dated 06.05.2017 restoring the petition under Section 125 Cr.
It was further companytemplated that the appellant and respondent No.1 shall file petition for divorce by mutual companysent by incorporating the terms and companyditions.
P.C. in the High Court which has been rejected by the High Court by order dated 05.11.2019.
As per the settlement the appellant was to pay Rs.25,000/ per month towards the maintenance of the respondents with effect from July, 2015 upto April, 2017.
P.C. for enforcement of the order dated 06.05.2017 being Execution Petition No.240 of 2018.
The maintenance petition was, thus, disposed of by the Family Court by order dated 06.05.2017.
P.C. was filed by respondent No.1 on 09.07.2013 against her husband claiming maintenance for respondent No.1 as well as respondent Nos.2 and 3, minor daughter and son.
An application under Section 125 Cr.
P.C. Challenging the order dated 05.01.2019 passed by the Family Court, the appellant had filed application under Section 482 Cr.
Respondent No.1 filed an application in January, 2018 under Section 125 3 Cr.
The arrears were to be paid within six months.
With effect from May, 2017, the amount of Rs.25,000/ per month was to be deposited directly in the account of Chandana Kapoor, respondent No.1 before 10th day of each month.
P.C. filed by respondent No.1 having been finally decided by order dated 06.05.2017 by the learned District Judge, Family Court, Family Court had numberjurisdiction to set aside the order.
On 14.10.2013 the appellant filed a petition for divorce against respondent No.1.
The Execution Petition filed by respondent No.1 was rejected by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Faridabad vide order dated 16.07.2018.
The appellant from May, 2017 paid the maintenance only for four months i.e. Rs.1,00,000/ .
Respondent No.1 prayed that order 06.05.2017 may be recalled and application under Section 125 3 Cr.
Brief facts of the case necessary for deciding this appeal are Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ARJUN BISHT Date 2020.02.19 The appellant was married to respondent No.1 on 170621 IST Reason 04.11.1998.
Shri Subodh Markandeya, learned senior companynsel for the appellant submits that the application under Section 125 Cr.
Aggrieved by the order dated 05.11.2019 of the High Court the appellant has filed this appeal.
In the objection, it was stated that the appellant had made payment of some amount as per terms since the respondent backed out, the payment was stopped.
The application filed by respondent No.1 was objected by the appellant by filing objection.
ASHOK BHUSHAN, J. This appeal has been filed against the judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh dated 05.11.2019 in CRM M 4663 of 2019 filed by the appellant for setting aside the order dated 05.01.2019 passed by the Addl.
On 17.08.199 a daughter was born and on 18.07.2005 a son was born out of their wedlock.
Respondent No.1 stated in the application that the appellant did number deposit the arrears of the amount as agreed and total amount paid by the appellant was only Rs.75,000/ towards maintenance.
P.C. was number maintainable.
On the reconciliation efforts made by the Family Court parties settled the matter amicably on the terms and companyditions recorded separately in the Court.
