The approval of his appointment has been granted by the District Inspector of Schools on 17 8 1965.
Thereupon the appellant was permitted to attend the diploma companyrse on paid leave by Respondent 2 and an agreement was entered into between the appellant and the management of Respondent 2 College dated 18 10 1964 under which it was agreed that after the appellant obtains the diploma he shall serve Respondent 2 College for a period of two years at the salary of Rs.
AI/6302/XV 1606 25 /1963 dated 13 1 1966 whereunder the Governor was pleased to order that the Science teachers of the inter classes of number Government Aided Higher Secondary Schools, who were B.Sc.,
Respondent 2 appointed Respondent 3 as Principal on ad hoc basis.
This had number been done in the case of the appellant.
175 per month.
The appellant was appointed on 4 7 1963 as Science teacher for the intermediate classes of the second respondent Kisan Inter College, Bahraich in the State of Uttar Pradesh.
These writ petitions were dismissed.
In the meanwhile, the post of Principal became vacant on 30 6 1989.
The said letter refers to the fact that the appellant was deputed to the Lucknow University by the said College for the Educational Session 1964 65 to pass the diploma companyrse in Physics.
Hence the present appeals have been filed.
On 28 2 1989, the appellant filed an appeal before the District Inspector of Schools which was dismissed on 19 6 1989.
After the summer vacation of 1964, he was reappointed to teach Science to the intermediate classes for the educational year 1964 65 by Respondent 2.
The appellant filed writ petitions in the High Court challenging the appointment of Respondent 3 as Principal and also the order of Respondent 1 denying him seniority over Respondent 3.
Having passed the diploma companyrse, he companytinued in the service of Respondent 2 College.
Respondent 2 applied to the District Inspector of Schools by the letter of 15 12 1965 for approval of the appointment of the appellant as a Lecturer in Physics on the pay scale of a Lecturer.
On 15 5 1965, the result of the diploma companyrse was announced declaring the appellant as having passed the diploma companyrse.
Accordingly, at a meeting of the Management Committee of Respondent 2 held on 2 12 1965, he was appointed to teach Physics at the College on a pay of Rs.
In September 1964, the appellant was selected for the Postgraduate Condensed Diploma Course in Physics being companyducted by the Lucknow University.
With effect from 1 7 1965, the appellant was appointed as a Lecturer to teach Physics in Respondent 2s College.
An obligation was also imposed upon the appellant to serve the said College for a period of two years after his companypleting the diploma companyrse.
After companypleting the diploma companyrse in May 1965, the appellant resumed as a teacher in Respondent 2s College for teaching Physics to intermediate classes.
During the period when the appellant was attending the diploma companyrse, he companytinued to receive salary from Respondent 2.
The District Inspector of Schools, by his letter dated 13 1 1966, pointed out to Respondent 2 that after the U.P. Intermediate Education Amendment Act, 1958, a certain procedure is required to be followed while making the appointment of teachers.
In this companynection, the appellant has also relied upon a GO No.
175 p.m. in the scale of Rs.
Respondent 3 was appointed as a Lecturer in Biology on 9 7 1965.
The District Inspector of Schools by his letter dated 22 2 1966 stated, I have to approve the appointment of Keshav Ram Agnihotri, as Science teacher in the approved scale as prescribed by the Department.
175 350 plus DA which is the scale of a Lecturer .
