The respondent was appointed temporarily as Programme Assistant in district IDARAS Information Development And Resource Agency by letter dated November 9, 1987.
The appellant was within its right to terminate the temporary employment of the respondent.
Her appointment was extended for a further period of six months from March 1, 1988.
By letter dated March 11, 1989 the respondent was informed that her services were number upto the mark and deficiencies in her service were pointed out after evaluation of her work.
She was given one moths numberice.
Her appointment was for a period of three months on a companysolidated salary of Rs.
Respondent in her writ petition filed against the order terminating her services as temporary programme Assistant was challenged principally on the ground that the order was passed without companyplying with the provision of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Notice being issued to the appellant to show cause as to why the writ petition he number admitted and disposed of it was submitted by the appellant that writ petition was number maintainable as the appellant was number a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution and that it was also number an industry companying within the purview of the Industrial Disputes Act.
THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 1997 Present Honble Mrs. Justice Sujata V.Manohar Honble Mr Justice D.P.Wadhwa A.Dave, Sr.
The respondent was told the need for her for putting serious efforts and to learn the sponsored subject.
By letter dated May 1, 1989 the respondent was told that her services were number required and these were terminated.
Termination of her services was number by way of any punishment.
Her employment thus ceased on May 31, 1989.
Ramesh Singh, Ms. Nandini Gore, Ms.M.Karanjawala, Advs.
The appellant is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act.
The respondent in her writ petition had challenged the order dated May 1, 1989 of the appellant terminating her services after giving her one months numberice.
It was a termination simpliciter.
She was given one more opportunity to show improvement in her work and period of her services was again extended from January 30 to April 30, 1989.
1200/ per month.
with him for the appellants J U D G M E N T The following Judgment of the Court was delivered P. Wadhwa, J. Appellant is aggrieved by the judgment dated August 4, 19095 of the Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court dismissing its appeal filed against the judgment dated March 10, 1992 of the learned single Judge allowing the writ petition of the respondent.
It was established with the main object of creating atmosphere for adult education which includes imparting education for women in rural parts of the State of Rajasthan.
