A Rent Note was executed which, inter alia, provided that the Municipal taxes were to be paid by the Respondent.
Sometime in 1970 the Respondent companystructed a floor above the suit premises.
175/ per month for the period from 1st January, 1977 to 31st August, 1977.
175/ per month in Court.
1,400/ by way of a Bank Draft.
940.13 was also claimed towards increase in Municipal taxes.
The Appeal was dismissed on 10th December, 1987.
4805 of 1988.
Both the trial Court as well as the first Appellate Court held that the Respondent landlord has number shown whether the sum of Rs.
The trial Court held that numbere of the ground had been proved and dismissed the Suit on 17th March, 1983.
108.34.
This Writ Petition came to be allowed by the impugned Judgment dated 18th August, 2000.
The Respondent then filed Regular Civil Suit No.
Along with the reply the Appellants paid Rs.
A part of the additional companystruction was let out to another tenant and the rest was occupied by the Respondent.
The Respondent then filed Writ Petition No.
On 10th December, 1977 the Respondent served a numberice to the Appellants claiming arrears of rent amounting to Rs.
1291 of 1977 seeking eviction of the Appellants on grounds of default, subletting and bonafide personal requirement.
In regard to Rs.
The Respondent then filed an Appeal.
940.13, claimed by him, was in respect of the entire premises or it was proportionate share of increase payable by the Appellants.
The Appellants sent a reply dated 13th September, 1977.
In this Notice a sum of Rs.
940.13 the Appellants asked the Respondent to explain as to what would be their share in the increases which would be allocable to the premises in their occupation.
On the expiry of the period of five months the Appellants companytinued to remain in the premises.
Thereafter the Appellants have been depositing rent at the rate of Rs.
1,400/ at the rate of Rs.
The Respondent sent numberreply to this numberice.
N. VARIAVA, J. This Appeal is against an Order dated 18th August, 2000.
Briefly stated the facts are as follows On 18th May, 1963 the Respondent let out the suit premises to the Appellants for a period of five months on a monthly rent of Rs.
