The respondent too had filed a writ petition i.e. W.P. No.
Notice was ordered on the special leave petition and the respondent, appeared in person and has filed his affidavit in reply.
6769 of 1986.
6769 of 1986 to challenge the Labour Courts award in so far as it provided only for 75 back wages instead of full back wages.
The special leave petition is directed against the dismissal of Writ Petition No.
2305 of 1986 and there is numberchallenge by the respondent against the dismissal of his writ petition W.P. No.
It is equally true that the charges framed against the respondent pertained to acts of major misconduct.
2305 of 1986 filed by the petitioner in the High Court of Allahabad against the award of the Labour Court in a reference made to it under Section 4 k of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act 1947 hereinafter the Act in favour of the respondent employee and substituting the order of termination of service of the respondent by an order of re instatement together with 75 back wages.
The High Court heard both the Writ Petitions together and by a companymon order dismissed both the petitions.
This special leave petition is directed against the dismissal of W.P. No.
23.3.1981, 30.4.1981 and 21.7.1981, and separate enquiries were held in respect of the charges companytained in each of the three charge memos.
