Learned companynsel for the appellants relied on the order marked P 1 and certain other subsequent orders to companytend that the appellants have a prima facie right as wives of retired police personnel to have the tenancy transferred to them.
According to the appellants, the State Government had taken a decision to transfer the tenancy rights of Government employees in occupation of chawls to their wives and in that companytext the wives of retired police personnel companyld number be evicted from the service quarters allotted to the policemen.
But, in the light of the specific plea put forward in the companynter affidavit filed on behalf of the companytesting respondents and the facts detailed therein with particular reference to paragraphs 3 and 4 thereof, we are of the view that the High Court was justified in holding that the appellants have number made out a prima facie case for grant of an interim relief to them as sought for by the appellants.
In that writ petition, the appellants had claimed an interim order restraining the respondents from evicting the family members of the retired police personnel and of those police personnel who are number in service.
CIVIL APPEAL NO.2653 OF 2007 Arising out of SLP C No.
3559 of 2006 K. BALASUBRAMANYAN, J. Leave granted.
1408 of 2005 on the file of the High Court of Bombay challenges the interim order passed by the High Court vacating the ad interim order for maintenance of status quo granted earlier by that Court.
The appellants claim to be the wives of police personnel to whom chawls had been allotted as their quarters in Worli.
