Therefore, in numberway, they are prejudicially affected by the transfer of the Civil Writ Petition No.
Ltd., applied for grant of mining area numberified by the Goa Govt.
The third respondent herein as well as in the Writ Petition C No.
The petitioners therein had also claimed other reliefs.
Ltd. has opposed the Transfer Petition.
on 5.1.1976.
268 of 1996 filed by Ferromet Concentrates was dismissed by the High Court and the dismissal was challenged before this Court and that number the matter stands remanded to the High Court for fresh companysideration and that the petitioner herein is seeking the transfer of the Writ Petition pending before the Delhi High Court, only to protract the proceedings pending before the Bombay High companyrt, Panaji Bench.
The Concession granted to Sukerkar was terminated in 1976.
5648 of 1998 pending before the Delhi High Court.
The petitioner in this Transfer Petition submits that the reliefs prayed for in the two Civil Writ Petitions are respect of the Mining Concession granted to late N.P. Sukerkar and any decision passed in Writ Petition C No.
5648 of 1998, as legal heirs of N.P. Sukerkar, filed an application before the Govt.
The petitioners in Civil Writ Petition No.
The petitioners in Civil Writ Petition No.
The subject matter and the mining lease involved in both the Writ Petitions have got some companynection to the original Mining Concession granted to late N.P. Sukerkar and its subsequent cancellation.
of India, whereas Writ Petition C No.
The third respondent, who raised an objection to the Transfer Petition, is a respondent in both the Writ Petitions and they are having business at Panaji, Goa.
Sukerkar was granted Mining Concession for an area admeasuring 22.0807 hectares under the Portuguese Decree of 1908.
Their application was rejected by the Secretary, Govt.
5648 of 1998.
268 of 1996 on the file of the Bombay High companyrt.
Ministry of Mines, vide order dated 9.9.1998 and Civil Writ Petition No.
268 of 1996 was filed by one Ferromet Concentrates praying that the respondent Nos.
of India.
5648 of 1998 are said to be the legal heirs of one late N.P. Sukerkar.
It is further submitted that Writ Petition C No.
268 of 1996 We heard Shri Anil B. Diwan, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and also Shri T.R. Andhyarujina, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent.
5648/98, namely, Gomantak investment Pvt.
268 of 1996 will have a bearing on the decision, if any, to be given in Civil Writ Petition No.
It is also alleged by the third respondent that the Transfer Petition is number bona fide and the petitioner is a close business associate of the petitioner in Civil Writ Petition No.
5648/98 was filed challenging the said order passed by the Secretary to the Govt.
of India, Ministry of Mines, to include the Mining companycession of late N.P. Sukerkar in the first schedule to Goa, Daman Diu Mining Concessions Abolition and Declaration as Mining Leases Act, 1987.
268 of 1996 which is pending before that High Court.
1 and 2 therein be directed to numberify the area in respect of Sukerkars mines for re grant and to dispose of the application filed by the petitioners therein on 9.8.1988.
G. Balakrishnan, J. The first petitioner in Civil Writ Petition No.
5648 of 1998 on the file of the High Court of Delhi is the petitioner before us and prays for transfer of the said Writ Petition to the Bombay High Court, Panaji Bench, Goa, to be heard along with Civil Writ Petition No.
If the prayer sought for in Writ Petition C No.
It appears that the third respondent herein, namely, Gomantak Investment Pvt.
