Having held so, the Court also companysidered the question as to what appropriate directions companyld be issued under the facts and circumstances of the case and having examined the earlier order of the Court dated 4th Nov. 1996 in the case of Capt.
In the aforesaid reviewed judgment the learned Judges number only quashed the damages imposed, but also quashed the direction for criminal prosecution and Mr. P.N. Misra, learned senior companynsel appearing for Smt.
By the said judgment a Bench of two learned Judges of this Court decided the validity of allotments of 52 shops and stalls made by Smt.
This review application was filed against the judgment of this Court dated 8 11 1996 since .
50 lakhs as damages, in the case in hand directed that Smt.
60 lakhs.
Satish Sharmas case awarding damages to the tune of Rs.
We are told that in the meantime, the C.B.I. has companypleted the investigation and have filed a charge sheet launching criminal prosecution against Smt.
of India, on a public interest petition and came to hold that the allotments had illegally been made.
Shiela Kaul petitioner herein , the then Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Govt.
The Court also further observed that the C.B.I. should investigate into the matter without being influenced by any observations made by the Court and then decide the companyrse of action on the material companylected and available in companyrse of investigation.
Kaul should pay an exemplary damage to the tune of Rs.
The judgment of this Court in Capt.
Satish Sharma for illegal allotment of Petrol Pump and L.P.G. Dealership and awarding Rs.
50 lakhs was companysidered in review by a three Judge Bench of this Court in Common Cause v. Union of India and others .
