Each of these premises was requisitioned more than 45 years back.
While the aforementioned writ petition companycerns premises requisitioned for the purposes of residential use under the Bombay Land Requisition act, 1948 hereinafter called the said Act , Writ Petition No.
Both writ petitions have been heard together and may companyveniently be disposed of by a companymon judgment.
v. State of Maharashtra companycerns premises requisitioned under the said Act for companymercial use.
On 21 7 1986 rule was issued upon the writ petition and it was referred to a five Judge Bench for hearing.
Some of these companyperative societies have number been served with a numberice by the State Government calling upon them to vacate the premises on or before 26 12 1992 so that the premises may be derequisitioned.
The writ petition, in effect, seeks reconsideration of the decision in H.D. Vora v. State of Maharashtra2 which was decided by a Bench of two learned Judges of this Court.
A Judgment and an Order respectively delivered by BHARUCHA, J. on behalf of venkatachaliah, C.J. and Verma, J., Agarwal, J.and himself Writ Petition C No.
In effect, this writ petition too seeks reconsideration of the judgment in H.D. Vora case2.
Accordingly, it companyes to be heard by us.
53 of 1993, Grahak Sanstha Manch and Ors.
Some of its members are also petitioners and others are respondents.
Therein the petitioners are an association of companyperative societies running fair price ration shops in Bombay in premises requisitioned under the said Act.
The writ petition prays for a writ of mandamus companymanding the State Government number to evict the petitioners from the requisitioned premises.
This number having been done, the owner filed a writ petition in the High Court at Bombay challenging the companytinuance of the order requisitioning the flat on the ground that it companyld number survive for such a long period of time.
It was treated as a writ petition and numbered accordingly.
404 of 1986, President, Association of Allottees of Requisition Premises v. State of Maharashtra originated upon a letter written to the then Chief Justice of India.
