He also denied the other allegations for the prosecution.
In fact, numbere of the prosecution witnesses is alleged to bear enmity with the appellant.
He delivered the sword which has been found by the Serologist to be stained with human blood.
The learned Sessions Judge believed Ujagar Singh and acted on the extra judicial companyfession made by the appellant to him.
The Sub Inspector took his thumb impression forcibly on three papers, but did number tell him the reason.
Later on, he went to the Police Station, Ekdil, nine miles away and lodged a report.
125 of 1960, K. Kapur, for the appellant, C. Mathur and C. P. Lal, for the respondent.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated December 8, 1960, of the Allahabad High Court in Criminal Appeal No.
The evidence led by the prosecution companysisted of the evidence relating to motive, to his extrajudicial companyfession to one Ujagar Singh when he was having a bath in the Canal, to his purchasing the sword and to his delivering it at the police Station after he had dictated the report.
deposed about the selling of a sword to the appellant on June 13, 1960.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal 89 of 1961.
A receipt about the sale was found on the person of the appellant when he was searched after his arrest.
Kehar Singh P.W.3.
The appellant adduced numberevidence in support of his statement.
Paley Singh, P.W. 2, and Baij Nath P.W. 4, depose about the dispute during the game of cards played on June 12, 1960.
He was detained at the Police Station till 11 a.m., the next day and was then put up in the lock up.
The High Court, however, did number rely on this extra judicial companyfession.
He alleged that one Paley Singh informed him about the murder of Sheo Sahai and asked him to go to the Police Station, Ekdil, and to inform the Station Officer orally about the murder.
December 19.
The Courts below rightly did number accept his version.
He did accordingly.
1782 of 60 and Referred No.
The appellant thereafter proceeded to the Canal Distributory at some distance from the village and had a bath there.
It relied on certain statements made by the appellant in his report dictated at the Police Station and companysidered those facts together with the motive and the evidence about the purchase of the sword sufficient to companyfirm the appellants companyviction and sentence.
Ajit Singh bears numberenmity with the appellant.
Both the Courts below rightly believed the evidence about the motive and purchase of the sword by the appellant.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAGUHBAR DAYAL, J. Ram Singh appeals, by special leave, against the order of the Allahabad High Court dismissing his appeal and companyfirming his companyviction and sentence of death, under s. 302, I.P.C., by the Session Judge, Etawah.
The appellant was taken in custody and as a result of the investigation was sent up for trial, The appellant denied the allegation that he had caused the death of Sheo Sahai and alleged that he was falsely accused of the offence.
The prosecution case, in brief, is that due to enmity, the appellant caused injuries to Sheo Sahai, who was sleeping in his cattle shed in village Bhadurpur Ghar, with a sword at about mid night on the night between June 14 15, 1960.
Sheo Sahai died of the injuries received.
