He also issued the Provisional Identity Cards meant for the bonafide residents of the Sanjay Labour Colony by forging signature of Naib Tehsildar Colonies Shri K.S.Gill.
1 Admittedly, whereas charge No.
The basic fact of the matter is number in dispute.
1 and 3.
2 was proved in the departmental proceedings initiated against the appellant, he was exonerated of charge Nos.
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 2.2.2006 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in C.W.P. No.
Inter alia, on the premise that the appellant had companymitted misconduct, a departmental proceeding was initiated wherein, following three charges were framed against him That Shri Jaswant Singh while posted and functioning as Clerk in the Labour Colony Branch of the Estate Office, UT,Chandigarh during the month of April, 1993 companymitted acts of gross misconduct in as much as, he participated in the companyduct of a survey of the Sanjay Labour Colony Near Sukhna Chok in an unauthorized manner without any orders or authority companycerned, made incorrect reports in 21 cases as falsely reporting them as residents of the said companyony.
By reason of a judgment and order dated 11.10.2001, he was acquitted of the said charges.
In view of my afore mentioned discussion, the prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond any reasonable doubt and by giving the benefit of doubt, the accused persons are acquitted of the charges leveled against them Emphasis supplied Appellant filed an Original Application before the Tribunal.
It is, furthermore, number in dispute that he was proceeded against in a criminal case.
He was directed to join the team who companyducted survey of Sanjay Labour Colony, Chandigarh.
Leave granted.
Appellant herein was employed as a clerk in the services of the respondents.
13790/2004 whereby and whereunder the writ petition filed by the appellant herein challenging the validity of an order dated 10.5.2004 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench in A.No.354/CH/2003 was dismissed.
