It is also manufacturing SMC and DMC moulded companyponents for the electrical, automotive and various other industries.
However, all the three Units are units of one entity i.e. Devi Polymers Private Limited.
It has three Units A, B and C. Unit C is being headed by the appellant.
These amounts were paid as advised by the appellant.
The companypany is also supplying SMC and DMC companypounds and companyponents to almost all the leading electrical switch gear industries and automotive industries in India.
4404 of 2010 refusing to quash the criminal proceedings initiated against him.
The appellant is a Director in Devi Polymers Private Limited, Chennai which is a leader in Polyester Moulding Compound PMC , Sheet Moulding Compound SMC and Dough Moulding Compound DMCO in India.
In the companyrse of business, the appellant thought of improving the companysultancy services and apparently companytacted a companysultant known as Michael T Jackson.
Leave granted.
Since an invoice was raised by the companysultant Michael T Jackson in the sum of 10,857.50 US Dollars, the said amount was paid from the funds of Devi Polymers Private Limited amounting to Rs.5,57,207/ .
The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment passed by the Madras High Court in Criminal O.P. No.
It is significant that numberamount has been paid or received by Unit C separately, independently of Devi Polymers Private Limited.
He also companytacted the regular companysultants of the Company i.e. Devi Polymers Private Limited.
All this, namely the engaging of companysultants and payments to them was apparently done at the behest of the appellant.
The amount of Rs.17,000/ has been paid by the Devi Polymers Private Limited to M s Easy Link.
A.BOBDE, J. We have heard learned companynsel for the parties.
The appellant was prosecuted by the respondent under Sections 409, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code in short the IPC read with Sections 65 and 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 read with Section 120 b of the IPC.
