Is the business carried on by the purchaser the same or similar to the business in the hands of the vendor ?
4,000 bags of processed sugar have also been left with the Company at the time of the transaction.
Appeal by special leave from the award dated June 6, 1961, of the Industrial Tribunal, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad in Industrial Dispute No.
224 of 1962.
It is against this order that the appellant has companyic to this Court by special leave.
13 of 1960.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
P. Maheshwari for respondent No, 1 S.R. Chari, M. K .
That is how their demand for re employment came to be referred under s. 10 1 d .
October 23.
K. Daphtary, Solicitor General of India, K. Sirinivasamurthi and Naunit Lal for the appellant.
An industrial dispute between the appellant, Anakapalla Co operative Agricultural Industrial Society, and the respondents, its workmen, was referred by the Governor of Andhra Pradesh.
The judgment of the Court was delivered by GAJENDRAGADKAR, J The principal question which arises in this appeal has relation to the scope and effect of s. 25 FF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 14 of 1947 hereinafter called the Act .
for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Hyderabad, under s. 10 1 d of the Act on December 7, 1960.
The respondents who were in the employment of Vizagapatnam Sugar and Refinery Ltd Hereinafter called the Company claimed that they were entitled to re employment in the said companycern which had been purchased by the appellant, and since their demand for re employment by the appellant was number accepted by it, they represented to the State Government that the said demand should be adjudicated upon by an Industrial Tribunal.
