Being aggrieved, the Respondent preferred an appeal being No.
The Tribunal, vide order dated 23.01.2009, dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue while allowing the appeal of the Respondent.
Civil Appeal Nos.
21,81,90,239/ .
91,16,99,060/ was filed by the Respondent which was selected for scrutiny under Section 143 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in short the IT Act .
Hence, these appeals deserve to be dismissed at the outset.
6,43,62,850/ .
137,20,34,576/ and penalty to the tune of Rs.
Being aggrieved, the Revenue preferred an appeal before the High Court being No.
Since the moot question is same in all the appeals companynected with the main matter, the same would stand disposed off vide this companymon judgment.
273,45,39,379/ showing a net loss of Rs.
Further, in view of the fact that it is number purely technical services and some element of software development is also involved in it and in the absence of such bifurcation, the Assessing Officer estimated such expense at the rate of 40 and remaining 60 for providing technical services by the Respondent in foreign exchange to its offshore clients and re assessed the taxable income at Rs.
8489 8490 of 2013 Brief facts The Respondent HCL Technologies Ltd. is a companypany registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in the business of development and export of companyputer softwares and rendering technical services.
3199 and 3344/Del/2007 before the Tribunal.
91,25,68,114/ .
The Respondent filed its return of income for the Assessment Year 2004 05 on 01.11.2004 declaring the undisclosed income at Rs.
Being aggrieved, the Respondent as well as the Revenue, preferred cross appeals being ITAT Nos.
The Respondent has shown gross income from business at Rs.
267,01,76,529/ while claiming deductions under Section 10A of the IT Act to the tune of Rs.
Hence, these appeals have been filed before this Court.
K. Agrawal, J. Leave granted.
331/06 07 before the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals .
These appeals have been filed against the impugned judgment and order dated 15.12.2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi in ITA Nos.
Thereafter, on 31.03.2005, a revised return of income for Rs.
The Assessing Officer, vide order dated 28.12.2006, held that the software development charges, as claimed by the Respondent, are numberhing but in the nature of expenses incurred for technical services provided outside India.
Learned CIT Appeals , vide order dated 09.05.2007, partly allowed the appeal while estimating 10 as software development charge incurred for technical services provided outside India as against 60 estimated by the Assessing Officer.
1244 and 1250 of 2009 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court had dismissed the appeals filed by the Revenue the appellant herein while upholding the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in short the Tribunal dated 30.03.2007.
