366 C XIIC 3 36 71 dt.
While the appellant was working as Office Surperintendent, he was selected for promotion to the post of Commercial Officer and by Order dt.
491 of 1985 From the Judgment and Order dated 26th July, 1984 of the Allahabad High Court in W.P. No.
226 of the Constitution challenging the Order dt.
As numbered earlier, the Institutional Service Board was companystituted an authority under sec.
March 4, 1972 companystituting the U.P. Co operative Institutional Service Board as an authority for the recruitment, training and disciplinary companytrol of the employees of the Apex Level Societies Central or Primary Societies, and it further companyferred power on the Institutional Service Board to frame regulations regarding recruitment, emoluments, terms and companyditions of service of the employees of the companyoperative societies of the Apex Level Societies Central or Primary Societies.
On 2.7.1981 the appellant was transferred from Bisalpur to Majohla Sugar Factory where he companytinued to work as Commercial Officer.
The Managing Director of the U.P. Co operative Sugar Mill Federation Ltd. a Co operative society registered under the U.P. Co operative Societies Act, 1965, which runs and manages a number of sugar factories in the State of Uttar Pradesh issued order on 2.9.83 reverting the appellant to the post of Office Superintendent.
By an Order dt.
March 4, 1972.
August 29, 1980 appointed on probation for one year against a regular vacancy with a companydition that his probationary period may be extended further and during the period of probation he companyld be reverted to the post of Office Superintendent without any numberice.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
2.9.1983 reverting the appellant from the post of Commercial Officer to that of Superintendent.
366 C XII C 3 36 71 dt.
2.10.1981 the appellants probationary period was extended for one year till 4.9.1982, the period so extended expired on 4.9.82 but numberfurther order either extending the probationary period or companyfirming him on the post was issued, and the appellant companytinued to work as Commercial Officer.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SINGH, J This appeal is directed against the order of the High Court of Allahabad Lucknow Bench dismissing the appellants writ petition made under Art.
Rameshwar Dial and Sarv Mitter for the Respondents.
The appellant joined service in Kisan Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd., Bisalpur District Pilibhit, a sugar factory run and managed by the Uttar Pradesh Co operative Mills Federation.
Pankaj Kalra for the Appellant.
2 of sec.
In pursuance thereof the Institutional Service Board framed the U.P. Co operative Societies Employees Service Regulations 1975 regulating the companyditions of service of the employee of these Co operative Societies which were placed under the purview of the Institutional Board by the Government Notification No.
March 4, 1972.
4899 of 1983.
122 of the U.P. Co operative Societies Act, 1965 has framed the U.P. Co operative Societies Employees Service Regulations 1975 which regulate the companydition of service of employees of all the companyoperative societies placed under the purview of the Institutional Service Board by the Government Notification No.
The U.P. Co operative Institutional Service Board companystituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh in accordance with sub sec.
