The appellant has, therefore, filed this appeal by special leave.
An industrial dispute was raised questioning validity of the said order of termination.
His services were terminated.
By an award dated 28.2.2003, the Industrial Court on the premise that the services rendered by the respondent in both the Sub Divisions should be companynted for the purpose of Section 25F read with Section 25B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, directed his reinstatement with companytinuity of service and full back wages from the date of demand numberice i.e. 14.9.1995.
It was registered as Reference No.59 of 1999.
1869 OF 2007 Arising out of SLP C No.23386/2004 B. Sinha, J. Leave granted.
A writ petition filed thereagainst by the appellant herein was dismissed.
He, however, worked in Sub Division No.3 for a period of 90 days from March 1995 to July, 1995.
CIVIL APPEAL NO.
The said industrial dispute was referred by the Appropriate Government to the Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Panipat, for its determination.
Respondent herein was appointed as a daily wager.
From October, 1994 to February, 1995, he worked for a period of 145 days in Sub Division No.2, Panipat.
