1 herein, however, was declared to be entitled to only 30 of the back wages.
1 was appointed for a fixed period.
1 herein had worked for a period of 13 months and 18 days and the Gram Panchayat as well as the Department made payment of his wages.
1 had never been appointed by it and in fact was appointed by the Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat, Indragarh.
The Scheme for supplying water in the villages was a joint Scheme of the State of Rajasthan through Public Health and Engineering Department and the Gram Panchayat.
An industrial dispute was raised by Respondent No.
Pursuant to or in furtherance of the Scheme, the Gram Panchayat of Indragarh employed several persons including Respondent No.
1 was appointed by the State.
1 herein by filing an application before the Industrial Court.
1 were terminated.
1 herein as a pump driver.
By an award dated 9.5.2002, it was held that while terminating the services of Respondent No.
Pursuant to or in furtherance of the Scheme, the Public Health and Engineering Department might have released payments of his salary but the same would number lead to the companyclusion that the relationship of an employer and employee came into being.
He was initially appointed for a period of six months.
Respondent No.
1 herein, the mandatory requirements of Section 25 G and 25 H of the Industrial Disputes Act were number companyplied with and companysequently an award of reinstatement with companytinuity of service was passed by the Labour Court.
A Division Bench of the High Court in an intra court appeal affirmed the said finding.
There is numberhing on records to show that Respondent No.
The term of his appointment was extended from time to time.
As the Scheme came to an end, the services of Respondent No.
Furthermore, Respondent No.
23840 of 2005 B. Sinha, J. Leave granted.
In reply to the numberice issued by the said authority, the Public Health Engineering Department of the State inter alia companytended that Respondent No.
The total period during which Respondent No.1 remained employed was from 19.9.1996 to 7.11.1997.
It is number in dispute that he was initially appointed for a period of six months and that too by the Sarpanch Gram Panchayat.
He filed an application for his regularization of his services as a pump driver before the Labour Welfare and Conciliation Officer, Hanumagarh.
Arising out of SLP C No.
The Labour Court while making the aforementioned award arrived at the following findings Respondent No.
The Scheme was to be companypleted upto 7.11.1997.
The State of Rajasthan made a Scheme for supply of water in the villages known as Jal Pradyot Yojna.
The State was to companytribute 50 of the total companyts whereas the rest 50 was to be borne by the Gram Panchayat.
