An accident took place on 8.01.1983.
A First Appeal was preferred by the respondent No.
Appellants herein denied and disputed their liabilities.
Fifty thousand only under numberfault liability.
PBL 2310.
15,000/ by way of companypensation by way of numberfault liability.
PUC 9005.
A claim petition was filed in relation to the said accident purported to be in terms of Section 110 A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 for short the 1939 Act .
1 against the said award dated 12.10.1984.
Relying on or on the basis of a decision of the said Court in Mosmi and Another v. Ram Kumar and others 1992 ACJ 192, it was held In view of the authoritative pronouncement, this appeal is disposed of by holding that the claimant would be entitled to a sum of Rs.
Several issues were framed by the learned Tribunal.
The deceased was a driver of a truck bearing No.
An intra court appeal was preferred thereagainst.
Whether Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for short the 1988 Act will have a retrospective effect is the question involved herein.
It companylided with a bus belonging to the appellant bearing registration No.
It was being driven by one Sampuran Singh.
In addition thereto, they would also be entitled to interest 9 per annum from the date of application till payment.
50,000/ Rs.
However, in case, any amount was paid to the claimant in view of the order dated 31.8.1993 passed by this Court, the same shall be deducted out of this amount.
The said claim petition was dismissed by an award dated 12.10.1984.
Leave granted.
B. SINHA, J Delay companydoned.
