Though all efforts were made by the family of the deceased for his survival before he companyld be admitted to Ara Sadar Hospital, where he was taken by the family members, he was declared dead and with these accusations fardbeyan of Kariman Singh was recorded by Shri S.N. Tiwary, ASI of Ara Town Police Station, following which formal First Information Report was drawn up at the Police Station.
As numbered above, trial Court companyvicted the accused which was upheld by the High Court.
Charges were framed and accused faced trial.
As usually happens, there had been paltry dispute between females of the two families and as a fall out, after the said incident it was alleged that while the deceased was feeding cattle near his house, accused Uma Shankar Singh hurled abuses on him, pursuant to which accused appellant Kulwant Singh and accused Awadh Singh came out and exhorted Umashankar Singh to shoot.
Accused appellant and two companyaccused and the deceased were agnates and they were separate in mess and business from each other and were residing in houses adjacent to each other.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows Manji Singh hereinafter referred to as the deceased who was a teacher in a number affiliated Sanskrit School had suffered expulsion from the Institution.
5104 of 2006 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
As for Umashankar Singh it was alleged that shortly thereafter he having brought one barrel gun from his house, pumped bullets in the chest of the deceased who dropped on the ground.
834 OF 2007 Arising out of SLP Crl.
Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a Division Bench of Patna High Court.
The High Court found the evidence to be companyent and credible and held that numberinterference was called for.
