The High Court by the impugned judgment accepted the claim of respondents 3 and 4 and held that respondents 3 and 4 being Graduates and eligible in terms of the Draft Rules ought to have been promoted in place of the appellant and other respondents who were promoted only on ad hoc basis.
Respondents 1 and 2 thereafter companysidered the claim of respondents 3 and 4 other similarly situated employees for promotion to the post of Superintendent in terms of the Draft Rules, as directed by the High Court and promoted Smt.
The appellant was appointed as Tailoring Instructor in 1983.
Asha Kiran, respondent number 3, to the post of Superintendent and posted her at Mahila Ashram, Karnal, in place of the appellant who was reverted to the post of Tailoring Technician.
Their promotions were challenged by respondent 3 and 4 on the ground that they being eligible for promotion to the post of Superintendent should also have been companysidered first and should have been promoted in place of the appellant and respondent 5 to 9, as they were Graduated and were, therefore, eligible for such promotion in terms of the Draft Rules, known as Haryana Social Welfare and Relief Organisation Service Group C Rules, 1983.
It is in these circumstances that the present appeal has been filed.
On 31.5.1991, she was promoted to the post of Superintendent.
Respondents 5 to 9 were also promoted to that post.
SAGHIR AHMAD, J. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 25.4.1994 of the High Court of Punjab Haryana by which the writ petition filed by respondents 3 and 4 challenging the promotion of the present appellant on the post of Superintendent was allowed.
