Aggrieved by the judgment in R.F.A. Nos.
It was also stated that an amount of Rs.10,000/ had already been paid as part of sale companysideration and actual possession was also delivered to the said purchasers in part performance of the agreement to sell.
827 and 718 of 2000 whereby the High Court dismissed the appeals preferred by the appellants.
1 was number genuine and companytending that respondent No.3 had entered into an agreement of sale on 04.10.1982 in respect of the said suit property in favour of the appellants herein for a sale companysideration of Rs.14,000/ .
10607 of 1985 and O.S. No.
Therefore, Respondent No.1 herein filed two suits bearing O.S. No.
On 23.12.1982, a registered sale deed was executed by respondent No.3 herein in favour of respondent No.1.
A reply was sent by companynsel on behalf of Defendant No.1 in each suit claiming that the sale deed pleaded by respondent No.
827 and 718 of 2000, this appeal has been preferred by way of special leave before this Court.
26, Nissan Huts, Austin Town, Bangalore which originally belonged to Muniyappa, respondent No.3 herein since deceased .
10609 of 1985 on the file of the XXVIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Mayo Hall at Bangalore claiming that he is the absolute owner of the suit schedule property and for possession from first defendant, respondent No.2 herein, along with mesne profits.
Respondent No.1 issued a numberice to respondent No.3 and the other occupants of the suit property for handing over possession of the suit property.
19240 OF 2006 Sathasivam, J. Leave granted.
3 and 4 were impleaded.
Arising out of SLP C No.
827 and 718 of 2000 and defendant No.2, respondent No.3 herein, filed R.F.A. Nos.
This appeal is directed against the final judgment dated 13.07.2006 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in R.F.A. Nos.
If the High Court dismissed the appeal based on the only reason as argued by learned companynsel for the appellants, it would be appropriate to remit it to the High Court for fresh disposal on all aspects.3 4, appellants herein, filed R.F.A. Nos.
730 and 830 of 2000 before the High Court.
It is also number in dispute that the said document has number been produced until defendant Nos.
BRIEF FACTS The appellants filed the above appeal seeking declaration of ownership over the suit property with recovery of possession and mesne profits.
