20,000/ and number the power of attorney as she was given to under stand.
The magistrate on the said application discharged the accused in Criminal M.P. NO.
Thereupon the appellants filed an application to discharge them.
O.P. No.
262 OF 1990 by order dated 22nd February, 1990 The respondents feeling aggrieved thereby, Filed Revision Applications before the Sessions Judge and the matter was transferred to the First Additional Sessions Judge who by order dated March 26, 1991 dismissed the revision petition .
On receipt thereof, the Judicial magistrate No.1, Madurai had taken companynizance of the offences and issued summons on February 22, 1990.
On a further Revision Filed by the first respondent in the High Court, by Order dated March 26,1992 it allowed the Revision by the impugned order and set aside the order of the Magistrate and directed him to companysider the facts on merits at the trail, Thus this appeal buy special leave.
Accordingly, the Inspector of Police, Crime Branch was entrusted with the investigation after through investigation, the inspector filed the charge sheet under Section 173 Crl P.C. on December 4, 1989 which disclosed companymission of the offences under sections 420 and 406 IPC.
There upon the first respondent feeling aggrieved, brought the matter to the numberice of superintendent of Police, Madurai and requested him to assign the same to another officer to make an honest investigation.
The Magistrate on the said application discharge them .
Ramaswamy, J. Leave granted.
This appeal by special leave arises form the judgment dated 26th March, 1992, passed by the Madras High Court in Crl.
10678 of 1991 The Facts relevant for out purpose are that in a litigation between Krishnaveni, the first respondent and Tulasiammal , The Second wife of her husband, Chinnikrishnan, the first appellant, Krishnan had offered his services and promised to help the first respondent in companyducting the said litigation and asked her to execute a power of attorney for that purpose in his favour, It is the case of the first respondent that on faith of the promise of the first appellant, she went to sub Registrars office at Madurai where the first appellant made her sign on some stamp papers in the presence of the sub Registrar.
Later it transpired the first appellant had got her signature on an agreement to sell her land which indicated that she had received Rs.
