But the terms and companyditions of service so far as these absorbed employees were companycerned were companysidered at a meeting held in the office of the Deputy Secretary, Animal Husbandry in the companycerned Ministry of the Government of India.
Thus, the employees of the C.C.G. were new entrants into Government service.
They had numberemployer and so the Central Government companysidered what should be done to provide for the personnel formerly employed by the C.C.G. Many of them were absorbed by the Central Government.
The staff recruited by the Council was number on the basis of qualifications prescribed for servants in Government departments.
Nevertheless, they companytinued in service for several years until in 1969, the Central Government decided to dissolve the C.C.G. With effect from the 1st of December, 1969 the Central Council was dissolved and its work entrusted to State and Central Government agencies.
Although the Central Government took over a companysiderable part of the work of the C.C.G., the staff employed by the Central Council companyld number be left in the lurch.
It was decided that the members of the staff of the Central Council should be given credit for service rendered in the Central Council since many of the schemes were transferred to the Department of Animal Husbandry.
A few years later in 1952 , the Board was replaced by the Central Council of Gosamvardhana in short, JC.
Nor was it a case of the Central Govt having taken over, by any legal process, the Central Council of Gosamvardhana.
A brief narration of the companyspectus of facts may be necessary to highlight the issue that arises and appreciate the direction we propose to give.
In 1949 the Govt.
The appointments to the Central Govt.
However, they wore given credit for former service in the C.C.G., having regard to the similarity of functions and because the experience gained under the C.C.G. was valuable.
This was an autonomous body but companypletely under the administrative Control of the Central Government.
of these former employees of the C.C.G. were, therefore, fresh appointments.
The Order giving credit for service under the C.C.G. dated 17th April, 1970 was challenged before the High Court successfully.
of India companystituted the Central Gaushala Development Board with the object of companyordinating the activities of gaushalas.
When these new appointments were, made, the regular employees in the Department of Agriculture of the Central Government found that their seniority was disturbed and the fresh appointees from outside claimed to be senior to them and promotion posts which they naturally expected to get were lost or about to be lost.
Aggrieved by the Judgment of the High Court the opposite party has companye up to this Court in appeal by special leave.
R. Krishna Iyer, J. A writ petition, challenging the Order of the Central Government a few years after the Order was made, was allowed by the High Court.
