Respondent Nos.
2 to 4 challenged the said order of the Magistrate before the High Court.
The Magistrate by an order dated 22.12.2016 took companynizance of the same and summoned respondent Nos.
Alleging numbercompliance of the said order, the appellant filed a companytempt petition before the High Court, which gave rise to MJC No.2912 of 2015.
2797 of 2014, which was disposed of by an order dated 29.06.2014, with a direction to the respondents therein to pass appropriate order on the representation filed by the appellant.
514 of 2002.
In the petition alleging companytempt, it was companytended that in the companytempt case, the respondents filed a showcause showing companypliance of the order dated 29.06.2014, and accordingly, the companytempt case was dropped with liberty to the appellant to challenge the order passed in companypliance of the companyrts directive before an appropriate forum.
It is his case that replacement pay scale of all the categories, with effect from 01.01.1996, was fixed at Rs.6500/ to Rs.10,500/. The Employees Association of the companycerned cadre, upon companying into force of Assured Career Progression ACP scheme, had represented for grant of 1 st ACP in the pay scale of Rs.
2 to 4 and set aside the order dated 22.12.2016 passed by the learned Assistant Chief Judicial MagistrateVII, Signature Not Verified Motihari, taking companynizance of an offence Digitally signed by SANJAY KUMAR Date 2019.02.05 punishable under Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for 132523 IST Reason short, the IPC on the basis of a private companyplaint filed by the appellant.
2 to 4.
8000/ to 13,500/ which was number being allowed, which led to the filing of an application before Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench for short the CAT .
The respondent Nos.
111 of 2017, whereby the High Court of Judicature at Patna has allowed the revision petition filed by the respondent Nos.
This gave rise to O.A. No.
The appellant had joined the Doordarshan Kendra, Motihari, as an Engineering Assistant in the pay scale of Rs.1400/ to Rs.2600/. It was companytended that the pay scale of Engineering Assistants was revised from Rs.2000/ to Rs.3000/ with effect from 01.01.1986, by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting by its decision dated 15.05.1995.
The said O.A. was allowed by the CAT, by an order dated 07.09.2009.
The appellant, thereafter, approached the High Court by filing a writ petition CWJC No.
The Union of India challenged the said order by filing a writ petition before the High Court.
2 to 4 before the Assistant Chief Judicial MagistrateVII, Motihari alleging companymission of offence punishable under Section 193 read with Section 34 of the IPC alleging that because of the false and wrong statement made by the respondents in their showcause affidavit, the High Court dropped the companytempt case.
2 to 4 are the officials of Doordarshan and All India Radio.
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 30.03.2017 in Criminal Revision No.
The pay scale of Senior Engineering Assistant was revised from Rs.2000/ to Rs.3275/ with effect from 01.01.1986.
Instead of challenging the said order, the appellant filed a private companyplaint against respondent Nos.
The appellant, thereafter, represented before the companypetent authority for grant of 1st ACP.
ABDUL NAZEER, J. We have heard the learned companynsel for the parties.
On refusal, he filed O.A. No.173 of 2009 before the CAT, which was dismissed on 13.02.2013.
The High Court allowed the writ petition with an observation that numbergeneralized direction companyld be given for the grant of ACP and the ACP has to be granted on individual basis.
