When his said appointment as Assistant Lecturer Electrical was due to expire on 31.5.1989, he obtained on 29.5 1989 an interim order from the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench in a Writ Petition, W.P. No.
4308 of 1989 allowed it and directed the respondents therein appellants here by a writ of mandamus to appoint the petitioner therein respondent here as Assistant Lecturer Electrical in the Polytechnic by his Order dated September 16, 1991.
Certain Jai Prakash Gupta was appointed on December 11, 1987 in an unadvertised post of Assistant Lecturer Electrical in that Polytechnic on ad hoc basis.
In the Select List of candidates prepared by that Selection Committee the respondent here had been placed at Sl.
8 in the Select List when was appointed in one of the posts of Assistant Lecturer Electrical , he who was at Sl.
A learned Judge of the High Court, who heard that Writ Petition W.P. No.
1, 2 and 4 were appointed as Assistant Lecturers Electrical in the Polytechnic in February, 1989 purporting to implement that Select List.
By then, there was another Writ Petition W.P. No.
He companytinued in that post by an Order dated 16.3.1989 issued by the Joint Director of Technical Education Appellant 3 .
Director of Technical Education Appellant 2 had issued an advertisement in the year 1988 inviting applications from eligible candidates for appointment in the posts of Assistant Lecturers Electrical in the said Polytechnic.
The respondent here and the said Jai Parkash Gupta, who had applied for appointment to the said post, were interviewed along with other applicants on 6.1.1989 by a Selection Committee companystituted for the purpose.
It is the respondents in that Writ Petition, who have filed the present appeal by special leave, questioning the validity of that order of the learned Judge.
5 while the said Jai Prakash Gupta had been placed at Sl.
Selectees at SI.
5 in the Select List should have been appointed earlier than the said Jai Prakash Gupta and hence the appellants here who were respondents in his Writ Petition should be directed to appoint him as Assistant Lecturer Electrical by writ of mandamus issued to them.
Venkatachala, J Leave granted.
4308 of 1989 filed by Rajesh Kumar Misra respondent here which was pending hearing by the name Lucknow Bench.
The respondent here in his Writ Petition claimed that the said Jai Prakash Gupta, who was at Sl.
The facts which had led to the filing of that Writ Petition and the relief sought for therein require mention as the Present appeal is directed against the order made therein.
When the appellants were ready and willing to appoint the respondent at Sl.6042 of 1989, by which the State Government was restrained from terminating his appointment.
