11870 of 1996, 4250 51 of 1993, 7406 of 1993, 11911 of 1996, 8090 of 1993, 16410 of 1993, 2533 35 of 1994, 2993 of 1994, 11178 of 1994, 15438, 17640, 13168 of 1994, 14415, 17196, 18159 of 1995 and CC Nos.
1400 2300 and, instead of ail the posts being filled up by promotions, ratio of promotees was made 75, and of the remaining 25, 10 were required to companye through Railway Recruitment Boards and 5 on the basis of Limited Departmental Competitive Examination.
Most of the Tribunals have rejected the understanding of the Union of India the main appellant relating to the meaning and scope of the memorandum.
There has been a cleavage of opinion among the various Central Administrative Tribunals CATS of the companyntry.
1996 Supp 2 SCR 358 with A. Nos.
8652 of 1996, 8919 20 of 1996, 8729 of 1996, 8725 of 1996, 2570 of 1993, 8905 of 1996, 2570 of 1993, 8703 of 1996, 8364 66 of 1996, 8905 of 1996, 2359 60 of 1994, 5305 of 1993, 8699 of 1996, 8702 of 1996, 8697 of 1996, 8863 of 1996, 8726 of 1996, 8655 of 1996, 8698 of 1996, S.L.P. Nos.
The broad companytents of the memorandum may be numbered.
The Ernakulam Bench of the Tribunal has even regarded the memorandum as invalid.
1600 2660 this scale earlier was Rs.
19260 of 1993, 20225 of 1993, 20528 of 1993, 20030 of 1993, The Judgment was delivered by B. L. HANSARIA J Per B. L. Hansaria J This batch of appeals requires us to decide two questions both of whom are relatable to the Railway Boards memorandum dated 15.5.1987 on the subject of recruitment of Traffic Commercial Apprentices.
