The trial companyrt believed both these witnesses with respect to participation in the incident by Kharaiti Lal.
In order to prove its case the prosecuting had examined P.W. 6 Vijay Kumar and P.W. 7 Subhash Chander.
46/86 Along with Kharaiti Lal, 3 other accused were also tried for the murder of Gobind Ram and for causing injuries to Subhash Chander, P.W. 7.
Another reason given by the High Court was that as both these witnesses were number believed as regards the injuries stated to have been caused by accused Subhash Chander and accused Ramesh Kumar and as they had number explained remaining 8 injuries on the deceased it was number safe to rely upon their evidence even with respect to the injuries alleged to have been caused by Kharaiti Lal.
Having gone through the evidence of Subhash Chander and Gobind Ram we find that, even though all the 4 accused were known to them, accused Subhash Chander and accused Ramesh Kumar were number named by both the witnesses in their initially version given to the police and the doctor respectively.
It did number believe their evidence with respect to the remaining 3 accused.
Nanavati, J. This appeal is filed by the father of Gobind Ram, who was killed by accused Kharaiti Lal, on 24.11.1985 at about 9.30 p.m. The appellant Kharaiti Lal was acquitted by the High Court by allowing his appeal against the order of companyviction passed by the companyrt of Additional Sessions Judge, Ferozepur in sessions case 20/86 sessions trial No.
