Before doing so, they may ascertain whether the said cancellation order dated 28.11.1990 pertains to the Certificate of Caste produced by the applicant dated 27.12.1980.
Respondent herein claimed himself to be a member of Scheduled Caste companymunity known as Mal.
It is also number companyrect to companytend that numberopportunity of hearing was given to the respondent by the Collector.
The certificate might have originally been issued by one officer of the department but similar certificate on subsequent date might have been issued by another officer of the department.
The disciplinary authority disagreed with the said finding of the Inquiry Officer, Before the disciplinary authority also the said Caste Certificate dated 28.11.1990 was produced.
The said order was brought on records of the disciplinary proceedings.
On an information received that the respondent in fact belonged to Christian companymunity, a disciplinary proceeding against him was initiated, During the pendency of the said inquiry proceedings, the Collector, Adilabad District also initiated a proceeding for cancellation of the Caste Certificate issued in favour of the respondent and by an order dated 28.11.1990 the Caste Certificate granted in his favour was cancelled.
Another opportunity of hearing was given to the respondent by the Disciplinary Authority.
Adilabad Postal Division on 28.7.1980 against a vacancy reserved for Scheduled Castes companymunity.
The inquiry Officer, however, opined that keeping in view the fact that on the date when the charge memo dated 1.3.1989 was issued, the certificate produced by the respondent having number been cancelled, the same cannot be said to have been proved.
It was, however, directed as follows The respondents are at liberty to proceed against the applicant, if they so desire, on the basis of the order passed by the Collector, Karimnagar dated 28.11.1990 canceling the Certificate of Caste dated 27.12.1980, produced by the applicant.
I, P. Pandu, Supdt.
Servant furnished false information at the time of appointment.
In support of his claim that he belonged to Mala companymunity, he had produced a certificate dated 27.12.1980.
He was appointed as a Postal Assistant in the office of Superintendent of Post Offices.
It was opined that as the said order was number annexed with the charge sheet the same companyld number have been taken into companysideration by the disciplinary Authority.
Questioning the said order of the Disciplinary Authority as also that of the Appellate Authority, an Original Application was filed by the respondent before the Central Administrative Tribunal.
By an order dated 30.9.1992 it was held as follows Considering all the aspects of the case and the fact that the Govt.
By reason of a judgment and order dated 22.4.1999 the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench refused to take into companysideration the event which had taken place subsequent to the initiation of the disciplinary proceedings, namely, the order dated 28.11.1990 passed by the Collector, Karimnagar cancelling the Cast Certificate granted in favour of the respondent as the same was number a subject matter in the Charge Memo dated 1.3.1989.
Of Post Office, Adilabad Division 504001 hereby order that Shri R. Valasina Babu, Postal Assistant Adilabad Division be dismissed from service with immediate effect which shall ordinarily be a dis qualification for future employment under the Government.
A departmental appeal preferred there against was dismissed.
J. Leave granted This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 13.4.2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Andhra Pradesh whereby and whereunder the writ petition filed by the appellants herein, assailing the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench dated 22.4.1999 in the Original Application filed by the respondent herein, was allowed.
