The State of Tamil Nadu was number made a party before the Trial Court.
This Court held The Constitutional validity of Act 13 of 1960 amending the Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1921 is under challenge in these appeals.
13 of 1960 whereby certain amendments were incorporated in the Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1921.
It was useful to extract and reproduce the brief order of this Court in its entirety for it will have a material bearing on the issue arising for decision before us in the presents appeals.
13 of 1960 was challenged by filing several writ petitions which came up to be heard and disposed of by Vardaraja Pillais supra .
Appeals by special leave were filed before this Court against the Division Bench decision in M. Vardaraja Pillais case.
The companystitutional validity of this Act was put in issue by several writ petitions filed in the High Court.
In the S.L.P. before this Court also the State of Tamil Nadu was number made a party.
However, the State was impleaded as a supplemental respondent in appeal as per orders of the High Court.
Feeling aggrieved by the abovesaid decision of the Full Bench, these appeals have been filed by special leave.
When the appellants lost the appeal, they sought leave to appeals to this Court.
13 of 1960 was upheld.
The State of Tamil Nadu was number made a party in the said leave petition.
This appeal is of the year 1973.
Looking at the nature of the companytroversy arising for decision and the view which we propose to take of the matter before us, a detailed statement of the facts is number called for.
The companystitutional validity of Act No.
Constitutional validity of Act No.
The learned companynsel number prays for time to implead the State of Tamil Nadu.
This Court dismissed the appeals vide its order dated 10.9.1986.
A challenge to the companystitutional validity of the Act cannot be companysidered or determined, in the absence of the companycerned State.
