The New Managing Committee of the Society formed in September, 1986, companyplained to the Regis trar, COoperative Societies alleging irregularities by the previous Managing Committee of which the appellant was the President.
Principal amount to be paid by the respon dents to the Jupiter Cooperative Societies Limited, Vikas Puri, New Delhi.
Respondent No, 1, Surender Gandotra was appointed the Arbitrator, who gave his AWard on 1.5.
The appellant then filed an appeal under section 76 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 1972 hereinafter referred to as the Delhi Act in the Delhi Cooperative Tribunal Respondent No.
Rs 1,46,2 10.20 Interest at the rate of 18 from 17.4.1985 till all the dues are cleared by the respond ents.
From the Judgment and Order dated 10.10.1990 of the Delhi High Court in C.W. No.
3, Registrar, Delhi Cooperative Societies, appointed an Administrator to look into the affairs of the Society since the appel.
All these applications were properly attended, scrutinized and dis posed of legally.
Even today 30th April, 1990, fixed for hearing numbere came from the side of S Shir Poonam Dhand, P.J. Kumar either presonally or through Advocate.
for the Appellant.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The miscellaneous applications relating to the dispute of juris diction of this companyrt and then that since criminal proceedings are pending with the Delhi Police, proceedings in this Court should be kept pending till final decision in the criminal proceedings.
This matter was referred to arbitration by order dated 12.10.1989 passed by the Joint Registrar Arbitration Cooperative Societies, Delhi Administration.
The appellant was earlier the Secretary and then the President of the Society till 1985, by which time substantial company struction had been companypleted.
It is also interesting that despite number of chances opportunities having been given to the respondent to file reply to the main points of the claimant society, the defendants S Shri Poonam Dhand and Shri P.J. Kumar did number file any reply and followed delaying and dilatory tactics and to defeat the ends of justice.
The companytroversy giving rise to this proceeding relates to the alleged discrepancy re garding purchase of some building material in January, 1984, for the companystruction of flats for members of the Society in Vikas Puri at New Delhi.
The relevant portion of the Award is as under It is also interesting to discuss the companyduct of these two respondents of this case, Shri Poonam Dhand and Shri P.J. Kumar as they have been moving applications after applications in this companyrt raising vicious and frivolous grounds just to delay the delivery of justice in this case.
Dr. Y.S. Chitale, and S.K. Sinha for the Respondents.
3237 of 1991.
Soli J. Sorabjee, S.V. Deshpande and C.L. Sahu, Advs.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by VERMA, J. Leave is granted.
1, 10,000.
The members were allotted three room flat for a sum of Rs.
Respondent No.
3204 of 1990.
In August, 1985, Respondent No.
lant and other office bearers had held the office for more than two terms.
6, Jupiter Cooperative Group Housing Society Limited, was formed in 1979 for providing houses to its 130 members including the appellant Prem Jeer Kumar.
