Formal order, it was then agreed, would be sent through Shanker Lal.
3200/ .
It appears that the police did number submit any charge sheet on the basis of the report which had been lodged by Ram Avtar and the accused were discharged.
Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated the 7 5 70 of the Calcutta High Court in Criminal Revision No.
On November 15, 1967 Shanker Lal handed over the said formal order to Ram Avtar and stated that the goods would be supplied on the following day.
On November 16, 1967 Ram Avtar lodged a report with the police against Shanker Lal after his suspicion had been aroused.
Price of the said goods was then demanded from Ram Avtar.
Raj Kumar Agarwalla thereafter filed a revision petition in the High Court for quashing the charge against him.
The companyplainant agreed to the proposal and wanted to see the seller of the foreign goods in question.
On the following day Shanker Lal came with another man named Pandey and told Ram Avtar companyplainant that Pandey was an agent of Shri Hanuman Agency and would supply the foreign goods known as washer plates.
172 of 1971.
Ram Avtar was also told that this transaction would fetch him a profit of Rs.
Pandey showed Ram Avtar the samples of those washer plates.
K. Sen, Mrs. Leila Seth, Mrs. Anjana Sen and O. P. Khaitan for respondent.
One of those samples was kept by Ram Avtar.
M. Kshatriaya and G. S. Chatterjee for the Appellant.
Another charge under section 420 read with section 511 Indian Penal Code was framed against Raj Kumar Agarwalla and Shanker Lal.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
Later on that day Shanker Lal and Raj Kumar Agarwalla came to the shop of Ram Avtar with washer plates in a taxi.
The prosecution case is that on November 8, 1967 Shankerlal representing himself to be a broker of foreign machinery parts went to Ram Avtar Prasad companyplainant and told him that he Shanker Lal companyld arrange for a transaction of sale of foreign goods which would result in good profit to the companyplainant.
38/ per piece.
370 of 1970.
The revision petition was allowed by the High Court on the ground that so far as Raj Kumar Agawalla was companycerned, numbercase had been made out against him.
Subsequently, the proceedings were set in motion against Raj Kumar Agarwalla, Shanker Lal and Saheb Jaman Khan.
Ram Avtar then agreed to purchase 200 pieces of the washer plates at the rate of Rs.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KHANNA, J. This appeal by special leave is by the State of West Bengal against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court whereby the High Court in a revision petition under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure quashed the charges framed by the Presidency Magistrate against Raj Kumar Agarwalla respondent.
A day after that Shanker Lal brought one Saheb Jaman Khan alongwith him to Ram Avtar and introduced Saheb Jaman Khan as agent of M s. Ashoke Trading Corporation of Indore.
Shanker Lal and Raj Kumar Agarwalla were thereupon arrested by the police.
Charges framed against him were companysequently quashed.
