He found the accused having been secured by others.
The accused denied having told his son that he had killed Savitri.
On companying back to the quarter of Gourishankar, he found that Savitri had been murdered.
In the result the accused was acquitted.
Sub Inspector Sharma, after reparing the inquest report, sent the dead body of Savitri to the mortuary.
Regarding the injuries on his hand, the accused stated that they had been received when he was lifting kanchas of bidis.
He then fell down and in the process his clothes became stained with blood.
The accused, addressing Kalu stated I have killed your mother.
Shantibai rushed out of the quarter and shouted while running that Mousiya has killed mousi.
Jankibai, her husband Hari Narayan, Shardabai, Hiralal, Har Prasad and Lajjashankar P. Ws.,
In the result the accused was companyvicted and sentenced as above.
The accused then gave one further dagger blow in the chest of Savitri.
Savitri was then carried in a vehicle to the hospital.
Dr. Khare found five injuries on the palmar aspect of the hand of the accused.
Gourishankar lodged report about the occurrence at police station Gopalganj, at a distance of 6 furlongs from the place of occurrence at 1 p. m. Sub Inspector Sharma then came to the place of occurrence.
You are number motherless.
Those present enquired from the accused as to what had happened.
Gauri Shankar met the party on the way and went with them to the hospital.
Those injuries, in the opinion of the doctor, companyld have been received by the accused while inflicting dagger blows.
Sita Ram has number companye up in appeal to this Court by special leave.
In the meantime, Kalu alias Munna, son of the accused, who was aged about 4 or 5 years, came there.
The accused at first gave numberreply.
The accused then remarked that he had killed the deceased as he companyld number tolerate the situation.
His clothes were at that time stained with blood.
When they arrived in the hospital, the doctor declared that Savitri was dead.
Learned Additional Sessions Judge did number place much reliance on the evidence of Shantibai.
No evidence was produced in defence.
The accused also came out of the quarter.
Injuries were found on the person of the accused and he was got examined from Dr. Khare.
who all live in the neighbourhood, then came there.
Those present then secured the accused.
Postmortem examination of the dead body was performed by Dr. H.P. Dutta at 11.15 a. m. on February 14, 1966.
Regarding the injuries on the hand of the accused, the Additional Sessions Judge found the explanation of the accused that they had been caused by kanchas of bidis to be satisfactory.
At the trial the accused denied the prosecution allegation about his having given dagger blows to Savitri deceased According to the accused, he was away to the market at the time of the assault.
He also did number accept the evidence regarding the extrajudicial companyfession of the accused.
The accused was put under arrest.
