The appellant, being aggrieved by the said judgment and order of the High Court is before us in this appeal.
By a preliminary numberification dated 18.8.1994, land belonging to 7 owners were acquired, out of which land measuring 1 acre 2 guntas situate in survey number 221/A belonged to the appellant herein.
Therefore, the appeal before the High Court should be dismissed but the High Court refused to accept this companytention and proceeded to examine the case on merit and having companye to the companyclusion that the award of the reference companyrt was number justified on the material available on record, set aside the said award and remanded the matter to the reference companyrt reserving liberties to the parties to adduce fresh evidence.
The land acquisition officer awarded Rs.
As against the said award of the land acquisition officer, all the seven owners including appellant preferred reference before the learned additional civil judge at Raichur.
It is stated that the government accepted the said judgment and distributed the amounts due to those land owners.
When the appeal of the appellant came up before the High Court for hearing, it was pointed out to the High Court that the appeals of the respondent filed before the district judge have been dismissed companyfirming the award of the reference companyrt and the respondent has accepted the said award and has also disbursed the amount in question.
Based on the valuation, six out of the seven appeals were filed before the district judge, Raichur and the appeal of the appellant being M.F.A. No.
The said companyrt after companysidering the material on record, enhanced the companypensation to Rs.
Against the said award of the reference companyrt, the respondent herein preferred appeals.
Having heard the companynsel for the parties and perused the records, we do number think the High Court was justified in interfering with the award of the reference companyrt.
The appeals filed by the respondent before the district judge, Raichur came to be dismissed on merits companyfirming the award made by the reference companyrt.
Leave granted.
Heard companynsel for the parties.
74,000/ per acre.
9,000/ per acre for all the lands.
3128/99 was preferred before the High Court.
