Hence, the appellant Haryana State Electricity Board has filed this appeal.
The decision in that case dealt with ex servicemen who had been re employed.
The respondent was granted the family pension but was number given dearness allowance relief and interim relief on the ground that the respondent was working as a teacher.
The Appellants have placed reliance on a decision of this Court in Union of India v. G. Vasudevan Pillay .
The High Court granted her dearness relief on family pension.
After her husbands death, she claimed family pension to which the respondent and her family were entitled.
The denial of dearness relief was challenged by the respondent in a writ petition filed before the High Court.
Ms. Sujata V. Manohar, J. The husband of the respondent was working as an Upper Division Clerk in Haryana State Electricity Board.
He died on November 14, 1996 while in service.
The respondent was working as a teacher prior to the date of the death of her husband.
