15370 said to have been advanced to them who companystituted a partnership business under the name and style of banwarilal kishanlal in 1947.
defendant number 1 alone filed an appeal against this decree.
11870 was lent between january 21 1950 and may 14 1951.
11870 plus interest pendente lite at 6 per annum.
appeal from the judgment and order dated march 31 1960 of the patna high companyrt in first appeal number 65 of 1954.
the suit was companytested on various grounds.
it also decreed simple interest at 6 per annum from the date of the institution of the suit until realisation.
4999 against defendant number 3 alone.
1 2 and 4 and passed a decree in favour of plaintiff number 2 for rs.
the trial companyrt found that the various amounts were advanced for the purposes of the firm.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 248 of 1964.
it is against this decree of the high companyrt that the present appeal has been filed after obtaining certificate from the high companyrt.
the high companyrt accordingly allowed the appeal of defendant number 1 and set aside the decree passed by the trial companyrt against defendants number.
1 to 4 for the recovery of rs.
c. prasad for respondent number 1.
1 and 2 respectively sued defendants number.
3500 had been lent prior to january 17 1950 and the balance of rs.
c. chatterjee and a. k. nag for the appellants.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by raghubar dayal j. the sole point urged in this appeal under certificate from high companyrt is whether a money lender registered under the bihar money lenders act 1938 bihar act iii of 1938 hereinafter called the act can sue his debtor for a loan in excess of the amount mentioned as the maximum amount up to which he companyld transact business under the registration certificate issued to him.
out of this amount rs.
sant saranlal and bhanuprakash lal plaintiffs number.
the trial companyrt accordingly decreed the suit for rs.
the facts of the case may be briefly stated.
