In response to the advertisement issued in January 1999 for filing up of certain posts of Head Constables Ministerial , the respondent applied on 24.02.1999 but did number mention in his application form that he was involved in the aforesaid criminal case.
This Appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the High Court of Delhi dated 31.07.2006.
On 03.04.2001 he filled the attestation form wherein for the first time he disclosed that he had been involved in a criminal case with his tenant which, later on, had been companypromised in 1998 and he had been acquitted.
Against that order the respondent filed a writ petition which has been allowed by the Delhi High Court and hence this appeal.
The respondent filed a petition before the Central Administrative Tribunal which was dismissed on 13.02.2004.
This case was admittedly companypromised on 18.01.1998 and the respondent and his family members were acquitted on 18.01.1998.
The respondent submitted his reply on 17.08.2001 and an additional reply but the authorities were number satisfied with the same and on 29.05.2003 cancelled his candidature.
The respondent herein Sandeep Kumar applied for the post of Head Constable Ministerial in 1999.
Heard learned companynsel for the parties.
The facts have been given in the impugned judgment and hence we are number repeating the same here, except wherever necessary.
The respondent qualified in all the tests for selection to the post of temporary Head Constable Ministerial .
