64 of 2008 before the District Judge, Gulbarga, seeking enhancement of companypensation assessing the market value of the land at the rate of Rs.24000/ per Acre which stood allowed vide judgment and decree dated 27.10.2009.
The Land Acquisition Collector made an Award under Section 11 of the Act fixing the market value of the land at the rate of Rs.
Petitioner has been deprived the higher companypensation as he companyld number afford to pay the companyrt fees though he was entitled for higher companypensation claimed by him.
The said reference was decided vide order dated 27.9.2003 assessing the market value at the rate of Rs.
District Judge at Gulbarga, modifying the judgment and award dated 27.9.2003 passed in LAC No.
Petitioner preferred a further reference against that order claiming Rs.45000/ per Acre for dry land and Rs.75000/ per Acre for irrigated lands.
500 of 1993 filed by another person was decided by the Reference Court under Section 18 of the Act on 28.9.1994.
The said application was allowed fixing the market value of the dry land at the rate of Rs.10000/ per Acre.
While placing reliance on the same, the petitioner filed application under Section 28 A of the Act.
510 of 2010 against the said judgment and decree dated 27.10.2009 before High Court which has been dismissed by the impugned judgment and order dated 12.9.2011.
15000/ per Acre for dry land and Rs.21500/ per Acre for irrigated land.
The possession of the said land has been taken by the respondent authorities on 23.6.1985.
Aggrieved from the said reference award, petitioner preferred LAC Appeal No.
Petitioner filed MSA No.
Thus, it is apparent that numberspecific demand was raised by the petitioner before the High Court.
One LAC Case No.
64/2008 by the learned III Addl.
Civil Judge Sr.
Gulbarga and pass any other appropriate orders, in the interest of justice.
3800/ per Acre.
193/2001 by the Prl.
Hence, this petition.
