The said representation was also turned down by the Director General Inspector General of Police, Bihar.
Being aggrieved by the Order rejecting the petition, the appellant filed L.P.A. No.978 of 2007 which was also dismissed on 26th June, 2008 and, therefore, the appellant filed the present appeal wherein the order dated 26th June, 2007 dismissing the Letters Patent Appeal has been challenged.
In the said petition a direction was given to the companycerned authorities to look into the grievance of the petitioner.
The appellant was number aggrieved by the order of punishment but he was aggrieved because numberpension was paid to him.
During the period of suspension he had absconded from the Training Centre, Ranchi without giving any intimation to any authority.
It appears from the order dated 28th July, 1989, passed by the Director General Inspector General of Police, Bihar, that the appellant had also made a representation earlier but the said representation had been rejected.
Thereafter another petition was filed by the appellant, which was also rejected and, therefore, he filed an L.P.A., which was also dismissed and, therefore, the present appeal was filed.
Therefore, after about 10 years, he filed C.W.J.C. No.1971/2000 in the High Court of Judicature at Patna.
In view of his above stated misconduct, the departmental inquiry had been companyducted and as a result of inquiry proceeding, by an order dated 14th September, 1977, his services had been brought to an end by way of punishment.
In pursuance of the aforestated order passed by the High Court, the companycerned authorities companysidered the case of the appellant and came to the companyclusion that he was number entitled to any pension as he was removed from service.
Thereafter, the appellant made a representation to the Director General Inspector General of Police, Bihar at Patna for his reinstatement on 7th January, 1989.
After hearing the companycerned parties, the said petition was rejected on 28th September, 2007.
Thereafter, he had returned to Palamu Headquarters and had reported his arrival.
By giving such direction, the petition was disposed of on 29th February, 2000.
Being aggrieved by the Order dated 10th June, 2001, the appellant filed C.W.J.C. No.8260 of 2002.
Being aggrieved by the order of punishment, the appellant filed an appeal before the Deputy Inspector General of Police, S.C.R., Ranchi, who did number find any substance in the appeal and, therefore, dismissed the same.
We heard learned companynsel at length.
Thus, he had unauthorizedly remained absent for 105 days.
ANIL R. DAVE, J. Leave granted.
Final decision was companymunicated to the appellant by the Superintendent of Police, Palamu on 10.6.2001.
Being aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 26th June, 2008 delivered in LPA No.978 of 2007 by the High Court of Judicature at Patna, this appeal has been filed by the original petitioner appellant herein.
The appellant was appointed as a companystable and while undergoing training at Commandant Training Centre, B.M.P. 1, Ranchi he was placed under suspension.
