Idgah means a place of public worship.
The suit was ditmissed.
The land bears plot No.
The appellant raised two companytentions.
The additional District Judge affirmed the decision of the Trial Court.
32, The appellant alleged that plot No.
The Custodian transferred the property to the appellant.
32 formed part of plot No.
The Trial Court held that the land in dispute was number Idgah and there was numberwakf.
116 and the land was Idgah.
The appellants case was that the land was wakf property and was transferred to the appellant by the Custodian of Jullundur.
The High Court did number admit the appeal.
The respondents were alleged by the appellant to be in unlawful occupation of the plot of land after the partition of India.
The appellant relied on three documents marked Exhibits P 1, P 2 and P 3 in support of the companytention that the property was wakf and the same property was transferred by the Custodian.
N. Ray.
C.J. This appeal is by special leave from the judgment dated 29 March, 1968 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
The appellant brought this suit against the respondents for possession of a plot of open land.
