The seizure thus took place at a spot which was 2 kilometers away from the Police Station.
With the intervention of the Appellant No.2 however, the demand was settled at Rs.1300/ .
The raiding party in the afternoon arranged a trap, it was however unsuccessful.
Certain other factual details though available on record but can be avoided as irrelevant for the present purpose, suffice it to numbere that eventually the tainted currency numberes in possession with the companyplainant reached P.W.6 Raman Wadekar and the raiding party headed by PW 9 Sub Inspector Saraf reached the spot and seized the tainted currency numberes from PW 6 Wadekar in the petrol pump.
One Purushottam Manapure was introduced as Panch and 13 tainted currency numberes of 100 denomination were entrusted to the companyplainant P.W.1.
Coming back to the defence once again, the Appellant No.2 also denied such an involvement and according to him, since the vehicle of one relation of P.W.7 Tijare was questioned on the road, P.W.7 has given false version against him.
The defence of the accused No.1 was of total denial and according to him, it is by reason of annoyance and vendetta that has brought the companyplaint into light and has numberfactual support therefor.
The second Panchnama was accordingly drawn up and after necessary investigation, chargesheet was filed upon obtaining sanction from the Commissioner of Police for the launch of prosecution.
On 19 01 1989 one Mr. Hiwanje lodged a companyplaint of abuses and quarrel between Sangamlal and his wife.
The factual companytext depicts that on 24.1.1989 at about 8.30 a.m., PW 1 Sangamlal and Panch PW 3 Manapure went to the accused No.1 in the Police Station and the later directed Sangamlal to go with the accused No.2 for the purpose of exchange of numberes.
The Appellant No.1 being the Sub Inspector called them to the Police Station on 23 1 1989 and on their reporting at about 9.30 a.m., Appellant No.1 demanded Rs.1500 from Sangamlal for terminating the proceedings.
The companyplainant PW 1 Sangamlal, however, at around 1245 hours lodged a report with the Anti Corruption Bureau and accordingly a Panchnama was drawn.
