As a companysequence, the respondent was reverted from the post in which he was in charge of the Police Station and a Misconduct Entry was made in his character roll on 5 5 1971.
It was because of the finding of negligence against the respondent and the Misconduct Entry that he was transferred from Fatehpur to the Fatehgarh Police Station in July, 1973 where he was posted as a Second Officer and number as a Station House Officer.
It is clear from paragraphs 40 and 4l of the very companynter affidavit filed in the High Court on behalf of the State of Uttar Pradesh, the appellant herein, that the respondent was found negligent in the discharge of his duties.
He made a representation that he was entitled to be posted as a Station House Officer, Fatehpur, but that representation was rejected on the ground that his name was number approved for posting as a Station House Officer in the district of Fatehgarh.
Finding that his representation had been rejected, he filed a writ petition in the High Court of Allahabad asking that the order transferring him as a Second Officer of a Police Station be quashed.
Under certain departmental instructions issued in Uttar Pradesh, a Station House Officer is entitled to a special emolument of Rs.
The writ petition having been allowed by the High Court, the State of U.P., the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Kanpur Range and the Senior Superintendent, of Police, Kanpur, have filed this appeal.
By an order dated August 21, 1973, the respondent was transferred from the Chandpur Police Station to the Kotwali Police Station as a Second Officer.
The respondent was working as a Station House Officer at the Chandpur police Station in Uttar Pradesh.
15/ per month while he is in charge of a police station.
Later on, he was transferred to Fatehgarh.
He protested against that posting since it involved the loss of the special emolument.
The respondent was transferred against as a Second Officer to Kanpur.
