50,000/ .
In so awarding it did number accept the companytention of the Appellant that the Appellant was number owner of the vehicle inasmuch as he had sold the vehicle in 1983.
50,000/ only under Section 95 2 b i of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.
It held both the Appellant and the Insurance Company jointly and severally liable.
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.
2,00,000/ with interest thereon.
A claim was filed against the Appellant, who was shown as the owner of the vehicle, and the Insurance Company.
It claimed that the Policy was an Act only policy on which numberextra premium had been paid for making the liability unlimited.
It was submitted that as the policy was an Act only policy the liability of the Insurance Company was limited to Rs.
J U D G M E N T N. VARIAVA, J. This Appeal is against the Judgment dated 17th October, 1997.
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal also did number accept the companytention that the liability of the Insurance Company was limited to Rs.
The Insurance Company filed an Appeal.
Briefly stated the facts are as follows On 5th February, 1986 an accident took place in which a young boy was seriously injured.
