Let the facts be known as they are, and the law will sprout from the seed and turn its branches toward the light.
Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated 9 8 1977 of the Himachal Pradesh High Court in Civil Revision No.
The appellate authority reversed this finding and dismissed the petition for eviction.
The Rent Controller having held in favour of the land lord, an eviction order ensued.
Possible number necessarily sure.
He filed a petition for eviction of the appellant tenant under S.13 2 ii b of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, as applied to Himachal Pradesh on the ground that the premises were being used for purpose other than the one for which they were let out.
The original landlord passed away and his sons, the respondents, stepped into his shoes as legal representatives.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The appellant, a harijan by birth and a companybler by vocation, was a petty tenant of the eastern half of a shop in Ram Bazar, Simla.
68 of 1976.
1526 of 1978.
Hardev Singh for the Respondent.
K. Bhatt and Mrs. Krishna Bhatt for the Appellant.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KRISHNA IYER, J. A small event may mark a great portent as this tiny proceeding for eviction, from a mini shop, of a little man, will presently disclose.
