Because of the alarm the villagers came running and according to the prosecution the accused ran away but two of them appellant Late A 3 and Mohd.
The other accused were also alleged to have participated and were arrested.
Rahish A 1 were caught by the villagers.
On appeal by the State against the said order of acquittal the High Court companyfirmed the acquittal of other accused but companyvicted the appellants Late A 3 and Mohd.
They were produced before the police.
There is numberdispute that a robbery took place in the house of P.W. 11 and some inmates were injured.
The prosecution examined several witnesses and mainly relied upon the evidence of P.Ws.
He along with four others were tried for offences punishable Under Sections.
The accused, particularly A 2, pleaded that they were innocent and they were going to a neighbouring place and the villagers who were running hither and thither caught hold of them and on suspicion they were implicated.
11 and 14 the father and son were injured and that some articles were also seized.
The information was laid before the police and investigation was companymenced.
Rahish A 1 on the sole ground that they were caught by villagers when they were in the house when decoity took place.
11 and 14 along with P.W. 13.
With regard to the participation all the five accused were put for trial.
During the investigation it was found that PWs.
An identification parade was also held.
The trial companyrt companysidered the evidence of all witnesses but was number prepared to place reliance on that and acquitted the accused.
397 and 395 read with Section 398, I.P.C. It is alleged that on the intervening night of 10th and 11th March, 1981, these accused companymitted the dacoity in the house of Chandan and caused injuries to the inmates.
After companypletion of the investigation the charge sheet was filed.
Some recoveries were also said to have been effected.
One Late is the appellant before us in this appeal.
The trial companyrt rejected the evidence regarding indcnti fication parade and this has been affirmed by the High Court.
