The trial companyrt placed reliance on the evidence of such witnesses and directed companyviction, as recorded above.
The High Court found the evidence to be number companyent and credible and directed acquittal.
The present respondent, i.e. A 1 was tried for offences punishable under Section 392 read with Section 397 IPC and A 2 to A 4 were tried for offences punishable under Section 392 IPC.
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT,J. Heard learned companynsel for the parties.
Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Madras High Court directing acquittal of the respondent.
Prosecution version primarily rested on the evidence of PWs 1 to 3 and PW 8.
