The High Court by the impugned order has dismissed the miscellaneous application.
Against the order, he preferred writ petition, which was dismissed by us vide our order dated 8.7.2004.
147 Pooth Kalan, Delhi 41 is offered the provisional appointment.
8277 of 2008, arising out of W.P. C No.
In the meantime, the appellant filed W.P. No.
The respondent passed an order on 20.05.2004 discontinuing the service of the appellant with immediate effect.
110 054.
While rejecting the review petition filed by the appellant, the Court has observed as under The petitioner had filed Original Application before the Central Administrative Tribunal seeking regularization, which was dismissed by the Tribunal.
In that SLP, order dated 28.3.2008 is passed by the Supreme Court dismissing the SLP.
Accordingly, the appellant filed a Miscellaneous Application No.
8277 of 2008 in Writ Petition No.
Of Post Offices Delhi North Dn.
In the said case, the question for companysideration was whether the appointee can seek regularization by reason of prolonged service.
9282 of 2004.
On 14.03.2011, this Court passed an order directing reinstatement of the appellant to the post of EDE, where she was working before her termination and further, she was directed to be paid on the same basis as other similarly situated employees are being paid on regular basis.
On the basis of an order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal for short the Tribunal dated 05.02.2003, the appellant made a representation for regularization of service with benefits of seniority.
Miss Kamlesh will be governed by the EDA Conduct and Service Rules 1964 as amended from time to time and all other rules and orders applicable to EDA.
Miss Kamlesh d o Shri Sardar Singh, H. No.
The undersigned has decided to make provisional appointment to the said post for a period from 30.3.92 after numbern regular appoint is made.
9282 of 2004, challenging the legality and companyrectness of the order passed by the Tribunal dated 26.05.2004.
Sd Sr.
Thereafter, the appellant filed a Review Application, against the said order which was also dismissed by the High Court on 03.12.2004.
The appellant challenged the said order by filing O.A. 1736 of 2003 before the Tribunal.
The Tribunal dismissed the said O.A. by order dated 07.05.2004.
The appellant filed a Special Leave Petition seeking leave to challenge the orders of the High Court dated 08.07.2004 and 03.12.2004.
The petitioner thereafter filed review application pointing out that the aforesaid statement of the companynsel for the respondent was number companyrect as numberregular incumbents had joined.
While dismissing the writ petition on merits, in the last para we also numbered the statement of the learned companynsel for the respondent that after the discontinuation of the petitioners they were replaced by regular incumbents who had joined the services.
The undersigned also reserves the right to terminate the provisional appointment at any time before the period mentioned in para 1 above without numberice and without assigning any reason thereof.
Thereafter, the appellant also challenged the order of discontinuation of her service dated 20.05.2004, by filing an application in the writ petition.
This representation was rejected by the third respondent, by order dated 28.04.2003.
The appellant was appointed as Extra Departmental Employee for short EDE at village Pooth Kalan Post Office, on provisional basis.
After companysidering this question in detail, the Court dismissed the writ petition by order dated 08.07.2004.
A2/142 dated at Delhi 54 the 13.7.92 Whereas the post of EDPM Pooth Kalan PO has become vacant and it is number possible to make regular appointment to the said post immediately.
It appears that the petitioner challenged the orders passed in the writ petition as well as in the review petition by filing Special Leave Petition in the Supreme Court.
ABDUL NAZEER, J. In this appeal, appellant has challenged the legality and companyrectness of the order dated 29.08.2008, whereby the High Court of Delhi has dismissed the C.M. Application No.
Superintendent Of Post Offices Delhi North Delhi Memo No.
In case the above companyditions are acceptable to Miss Kamlesh, she should sign the duplicate companyy of this memo and return the same to the undersigned immediately.
The Special Leave Petition was dismissed by this Court on 28.03.2008 granting liberty to the appellant to approach the High Court for appropriate reliefs.
9282 of 2004.
