2144 of 1990.
The appellant who was the petitioner before the High Court, filed the aforesaid writ petitions challenging an order made by the second respondent herein appointing the 3rd respondent as an arbitrator under the provisions of the Punjab Cooperative Societies Act, 1961 for short the Act which petitions came to be dismissed by the Full Bench of the High Court, following an earlier Full Bench judgment of the same High Court which is since reported as Mam Raj v. State of Haryana Ors.
By that judgment, the High Court dismissed the said writ petition filed by the appellant challenging the orders of the Chancellor of the Utkal University dated 21.5.1990.
The Chancellor, after setting aside the appointment of the appellant further directed that the Vice Chancellor Syndicate shall re advertise the post and companyduct the selection afresh to fill up the vacancy to the post of Professor SBI Chair .
The 5th respondent, being aggrieved by the order of the Vice Chancellor dated 21.5.1990 in so far as it directed re advertisement, filed OJC No.
The said order was passed by the chancellor on a representation filed by the 5th respondent, Dr. Mrs. Bedabati Mohanty.
Jagannadha Rao.
Santosh Hegde, J. These appeals are against the judgment and order dated 19.4.1983 passed by the High Court of Punjab Haryana in Civil Writ Petition Nos.2621 and 2622 of 1976.
1910 of 1990.
J. The appellant, Dr. Kumar Bar Das has filed this appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Orissa dated 30.9.1993 in O.J.C. No.
There is also an application for companydonation of delay.
The Chancellor, by the said order, had set aside the appointment of the appellant dated 3.2.1990 as Professor of Economics State Bank of India Chair hereinafter called SBI Chair , holding that the recommendation of the Selection Committee dated 29.2.1984 was invalid.
2144 of 1990 to the extent it set aside the orders of the Chancellor directing re advertisement and directing the appointment of the 5th respondent.
