The said application was dismissed on 17.7.1998 against which order a Criminal Revision Petition No.
Hence, this petition.
The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate on 19.11.94 took companynizance under sections 498 A, 313 of the IPC and sections 3 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1971 and discharged the accused Dr. Mrs. Snehlata Mukherjee.
On 12.2.1998, an application was filed on behalf of the petitioner to proceed for the trial of the accused under section 313 of the IPC.
The petitioner filed a written companyplaint before the Golmuri Police Station at Jamshedpur on 2.9.1994 against her husband the respondent number 2 and his other relatives.
172/94 was registered for offences under sections 498 A, 313 of the Indian Penal Code IPC and sections 3 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1971.
The remaining accused filed an application on 15.5.1995 to delete section 313 of the IPC from the charge sheet as numbercase was made out for the said offence.
After investigation, charge sheet was filed.
On the said companyplaint, Golmuri P.S. Case No.
However, Dr. Mrs. Snehlata Mukherjee was number sent for trial against whom it was alleged by the companyplainant that she was aborted at the nursing home of the said doctor.
Shivaraj V. Patil J. The order dated 31.10.2000 passed by the Patna High Court, Ranchi Bench, Ranchi, in Criminal Revision No.
101 of 2000 R is assailed in this petition.
The learned Magistrate, by his order dated 1.9.1995, allowed the application and the charge against the accused under section 313 of the IPC was deleted.
The petitioner did number challenge either the order dated 19.11.1994 discharging Dr. Mrs. Snehlata Mukherjee or the order dated 1.9.1995 discharging the accused for offence under section 313 of the IPC.
303/98 R was preferred by the petitioner before the High Court.
It is this order, which was challenged before the High Court and the High Court, by the impugned order dismissed the Revision Petition filed by the petitioner.
