Accordingly, the parties have taken some time to look into the question whether an amicable settlement can be arrived at and finally mentioned before us that they have agreed to an amicable settlement in the following manner I The portion of the property already sold by the respondents herein to Smt.
Since the parties have agreed that the portion of the property already sold by the respondents in favour of one Smt.
Poonam Chokse and Smt.
Rasmani Jaiswal by way of different sale deeds will number be disturbed and will be accepted as final and companyclusive.
174/1995 Rajmohan Agarwal Vs.
Poonam Chokse and Smt.
The parties before us through their learned companynsel have suggested that whatever rate that is fixed by this Court shall be accepted by all of them.
173/1995 Shasi Mohan Agarwal Vs.
Pursuant to the amicable settlement arrived at between the parties, and the parties having broadly settled their dispute as to the valuation of the property on the terms and companyditions as indicated hereinabove, these appeals can be disposed of on companypromise on the following terms and companyditions The total area of the land was 49,259 Sq.
Fatima Ahmed alias Begum Rashiduddin Siddiqui 2 others , Appeal No.
These appeals were heard for a companysiderable length of time, it was suggested by the Court that in the facts and circumstances of the case, the parties may explore the possibility of an amicable settlement.
206/1995 Shashi Mohan Agarwal Vs.
Amna , Appeal No.
II The appellants shall purchase the remaining area i.e. the portion of the land number sold by the respondents at the current market value.
204/1995 Rajmohan Agarwal vs. Smt Amna Abubakar Another and Appeal No.
Amna Abubaker respondents herein .
Rasmani Jaiswal shall number be disturbed and shall be accepted as final and companyclusive, only the possession of the remaining area namely, 24,477.89, marked B in the sketch map Annexure AA2 shall be handed over to the appellants by the respondents at a companysideration mentioned hereinafter.
Fatima Ahmed alias Begum Rashiduddin Siddiqui 2 others , passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur, companyfirming the judgment and decree of the trial companyrt in a suit for specific performance of a companytract, by which the suit and the appeals were dismissed.
out of which 24,477.89 marked B in the sketch map annexed with the affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents as Annexure AA2 is still in possession of Begum Fatima Ahmed Smt.
TARUN CHATTERJEE,J. These four appeals are directed against the judgment and decree passed in four First Appeals, being Appeal No.
