The trial companyrt believed the evidence of Basant Ram, Din Dayal, M.K. Bhatnagar and Kalu Ram P.Ws.1 to 4 and companyvicted the respondents under Section 302 read with 34 IPC.
P 1, alleged to have been discovered by respondent Raj Kumar, as the medical evidence showed that the injuries found on the person of Jai Bhagwan companyld number have been caused by that dagger.
The High Court also doubted that the fatal injuries were caused to Jai Bhagwan with dagger Ex.
The other appeal was filed by accused Uday Singh.
The High Court on reappreciation of their evidence found that the version given by them was so improbable and sic their companyduct was so unnatural that it created a serious doubt regarding the truthfulness of their evidence.
All the three appellants were acquitted by the High Court and thereafter Din Dayal, the witness in the case and close relative of deceased Jai Bhagwan, has filed these appeals after obtaining special leave from this Court.
The High Court also found that there was enmity between Jai Bhagwan and the respondents and the witnesses shared that hostility along with Jai Bhagwan.
Appeal No.53/86 was filed by accused Raj Kumar and Pawan Kumar.
A.Nos.53/86 and 56/ 86.
Nanavati, J. Both these appeals arise out of the companymon judgement of the High Court of Delhi in Crl.
