Various terms and companyditions were set out in the allotment letter.
Public premises companyprise a booth shop for the trade of furniture bearing No.
By order dated October 13, 1987, the Estate Officer cancelled the lease and forfeited the security amount of Rs.
225, Sector 34 D, Chandigarh.
By letter dated September 3, 1979, booth was allotted on lease to Niranjan Kaur and her four sons Ishar Singh, Pritpal Singh, Bablu and Bintu alias Inderjit Singh and Sardool Singh by the Estate Officer, Chandigarh Administration.
This was dismissed by order dated February 28, 1990.
Allotment was governed by the Act and the Rules.
Lease of the booth was cancelled and proceedings were initiated to resume the booth.
Allottees violated the terms of payment of instalments and also companymitted breach of companydition by assigning the booth to M s. Kang Furniture Co. also described as Kang Enterprises .
Describing as Niranjan Kaur and others an appeal was filed under the Rules Rule 22 before the Chief Administrator, Union Territory of Chandigarh against the order of the Estate Officer cancelling the lease of the booth.
It was directed that the amount of arrears be recovered as arrears of land revenue and possession of the booth be taken under the Rules.
P. Wadhwa, J. This petition is directed against the order dated December 22,1997 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of the orders of the authorities for taking possession of public premises under the Public Premises Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants Act, 1971 for short, PP Act .
The lease of the public premises had been resumed under the provisions of the Capital of Punjab Development and Regulation Act, 1952 and the Chandigarh Lease hold of Sites and Buildings Rules, 1973 for short, the Act and the Rules .
