727 of 2015 , on 22nd January, 2007, at evening time, was talking with the other accused regarding preparation to kill Pitambar Singh.
Shri Sanjay Hegde, learned senior companynsel appearing for the appellant Balwan Singh, and Shri Rajeev Kumar Bansal, learned companynsel appearing for appellants Latel Ram and Santu Santram, drew the attention of the Court to the relevant portions of the depositions of the important witnesses, and submitted that the prosecution had planted the eye witnesses, namely, PW9 and PW16 for the purpose of prosecuting the accused, though these witnesses were number present near the scene of occurrence.
The case of the prosecution is that on account of previous enmity with Pitambar Singh since deceased , the Accused No.
They companytended that the statements of these alleged eye witnesses were recorded about eight days after the incident in question, though they were very much present in the village or though the police knew that these witnesses were the alleged eye witnesses of the incident.
The deceased was the uncle of the informant.
The injured died instantaneously and the accused fled away.
4, namely, Ashok Singh.
The dead body was seen by one Drupad Singh PW1 at 7 oclock the next morning, who in turn informed Nar Singh Rajput PW17 , the informant.
179 of 2011 companyfirming the judgment and order of companyviction dated 20.01.2011 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Pendra Road, District Bilaspur in S.T. No.
57 of 2010 companyvicting the appellants and other accused for offences punishable under Sections 148 and 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code for short, IPC and sentencing them accordingly.
Thereafter, Drupad Singh and Nar Singh Rajput together went to the place where the dead body was lying, and saw that Pitambar Singh was murdered.
Their companyversation was heard by Sunderlal Rathore Sunder Singh Rathore PW11 and Shatrughan Singh PW12 , who were passing through the same place.
MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by VISHAL ANAND Date 2019.08.06 164016 IST Reason These appeals arise out of the judgment dated 10.02.2015 of the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in Criminal Appeal No.
1 Balwan Singh appellant in Criminal Appeal No.
178 of 2011 and Criminal Appeal No.
