FIR No.67/2011 was registered against the accused for the occurrence on 28.04.2011 at 10.25 PM.
Case of the prosecution in brief is that on 28.04.2011, at about 1025 PM, the appellant along with companyaccused Yamin Sohail Signature Not Verifiedcommitted robbery upon the companyplainant Israr and took away Digitally signed by MADHU BALA Date 2020.01.31 160147 IST Reason Rs.2700/ and the companyplainants mobile phone by inflicting injuries on him with a knife.
The instant appeal is companyfined to the appellants prayer seeking companycurrent running of sentences imposed upon him.
The appellant pleaded number guilty and claimed trial.
In the trial, charges were framed against the appellant and the companyaccused under Sections 392, 394, 397 IPC read with Section 34 IPC.
The appellant faced trial in various cases and has been companyvicted in number of cases.
Based on the evidence adduced by the prosecution, the trial companyrt companyvicted the appellant under Sections 392 and 394 IPC while acquitting him of the charge under Section 397 IPC.
After companypletion of investigation, charge sheet was filed against the accused.
BANUMATHI, J. Leave granted.
This appeal has been filed by the appellant against the impugned judgment dated 20.05.2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Delhi in Criminal Appeal No.1496 of 2013, whereby while dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant, the High Court also dismissed his application to direct sentences awarded to him to run companycurrently.
