Thereafter, this petitioner appellant applied by Crl MPs Nos.
On 1 10 1996 while directing numberice to issue insofar as Petitioner 4, A. Sivanesan is companycerned, it was felt necessary to verify whether or number numberice of lodgment of appeal was served on him before the appeal was disposed of by the High Court.
The facts reveal that the appeal was allowed and the order of acquittal was set aside by the High Court.
The special leave petition insofar as Petitioners 1, 2 and 3 are companycerned has already been dismissed.
The Registrar of the High Court was directed to verify the record and to inform this Court whether or number the numberice of lodgment of appeal was initially served on A. Sivanesan also along with Petitioners 1, 2 and 3.
Special leave granted.
We number find from the letter of the Assistant Registrar of the High Court of Tamil Nadu dated 29 10 1986 that numbernotice of lodgment of appeal was served on the petitioner A. Sivanesan before the appeal was disposed of.
1907 08 of 1996 for recalling the order and for hearing the appeal on merits.
