Joginder Singh in his evidence stated that the said revolver was found from the person of the appellant and on examination it was found in working order.
He was, therefore, prosecuted for the offence punishable under Section 25 of the Arms Act read with Section 5 of the TADA Act.
It was found loaded with one empty cartridge and five live cartridges.
In order to prove its case, case, the prosecution examined the Investigating Officer Joginder Singh, who was then an Inspector of Police and PW.2 Karnail Singh, who was one of the recovery witnesses.
During the nakabandi, police numbericed the appellant moving in suspicious circumstances.
for the Respondent J U D G M E N T The following Judgement of the Court was delivered NANAVATI, J. The appellant has filed this appeal against the judgment and order of the Add1.
84 of 1989.
One personal search, the appellant was found carrying one .32 bore revolver which was in working order.
Judge, Designated companyrt, Sangrur in Special Sessions Case No.
for the appellant Kuldip Singh and R.S.Sodhi, Advs.
