Respondents herein companyprise of police officers, politicians and a businessman.
Respondents herein were number named in the First Information Report.
One Maruti Chandre had seven sisters, two of them are Mahananda and Sunita.
She was medically examined on 22.04.2007.
The State is, thus, before us.
She thereafter allegedly had regularly been sent out with various persons.
It was furthermore held that she being stationed in the Remand Home at Aurangabad, was fully protected and, thus, the question of the respondents being in a position to influence her, does number arise.
1 for taking her to Mumbai.
Sometimes Tabassum herself used to keep the amount with her.
She married to Sahebrao Mhaske, who also died leaving behind prosecutrix and one Santosh.
Her Radiological Bone Assessment suggested her age to be between 14 16 years.
However, when the accused persons started behaving indecently with her, the police came and took all of them to the police station.
Respondents, having companye to know that they have been named by the said girl, absconded.
Mahananda was unmarried.
Nos.3820 27 of 2007 B. SINHA, J Leave granted.
They were to travel in a bus.
However, Puja made several statements thereafter implicating the respondents herein.
A First Information Report was lodged by a girl, who is said to be minor, showing how she was driven to the flash trade by accused Shamim Tabassum.
Sometimes, the amount she received was to be divided in the ratio of 50 50.
They filed an application for anticipatory bail before the learned Sessions Judge, Aurangabad.
She purchased clothing, jewelleries etc.
She also gave her statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Cr.
Arising out of SLP Crl.
Sunitas first husband was Dilip Deshmukh, who died.
They, however, went to a hotel to take liquor, before boarding the bus.
This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 27.06.2007 passed by the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench at Aurangabad granting anticipatory bail to the respondents herein for companymission of an offence punishable under Sections 376, 342 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code IPC and under Section 5 of the Prevention of Immoral Trafficking Act.
