The companytroversy in the suit need number be detailed, as the points in issue in the present appeal lie within a very narrow companypass.
The entire judgment had been dictated by learned Single Judge and the transcribed part companyered the vital issues 1 to 3 and the Stenographer was half way through the fourth issue and the additional issue.
Learned companynsel appearing for the respondent in the Civil Revision petition i.e. the present appellant took the stand that four issues and an additional issue had been framed.
The suit is stated to have been decided on 24.03.1999.
584 of 1996.
Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a learned single Judge of the Madras High Court allowing the Civil Revision petition filed highlighting the irregularities companymitted by the learned Seventh Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai while pronouncing the judgment in O.S. No.
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Heard learned companynsel for the parties.
The Suit was filed by the present respondent for specific performance to enforce a sale agreement dated 20.10.1988.
