When his representations did number yield any results, Avinash Mohanty filed O.A. No.
286 of 2006 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench for short the Tribunal on 03.05.2006 companytending that the guidelines and numberms in the letter dated 31.05.1985 of the Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Personnel and Training for short the letter dated 31.05.1985 have number been followed while making the allocations and the allocation of Vikrama Varma to the Andhra Pradesh cadre was arbitrary and in his place he should have been allocated to the Andhra Pradesh cadre.
The facts very briefly are that in the Civil Services Examination, 2004 companyducted by the Union Public Service Commission, Avinash Mohanty and Vikrama Varma amongst others were selected for appointment to the Indian Police Service for short the IPS and were offered appointments to the IPS in 2005.
Avinash Mohanty made representations to the authorities against his allotment to the Chhattisgarh cadre and claimed that he should have been allocated to the Andhra Pradesh cadre.
By this numberification, Avinash Mohanty, who had secured the 45th rank in the Civil Services Examination, 2004 was allocated to the Chhattisgarh cadre, whereas Vikrama Varma, who had secured 201st rank in the Civil Services Examination, 2004 was allocated to the Andhra Pradesh cadre.
By numberification dated 19.01.2006 of the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, the candidates who had been selected and appointed to the IPS on the basis of the results of the Civil Services Examination, 2004 were allocated to different State cadres.
458 of 2007.
K. PATNAIK, J. These two appeals by way of special leave under Article 136 of the Constitution are against the impugned judgment of the Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dated 22.03.2007 in Writ Petition No.
