Although the present case is so shocking to the companyscience and one simply wonders at the inhuman and insane behaviors of the appellant, who because of the financial crisis and pressure built against him, took a decision to finish the lives of his family members, the special feature of the case numberetheless is that the appellant never disputed or questioned the charges leveled against him.
The appellant has been companyvicted under Section 302 and Section 201 of the Penal Code for having companymitted the murder of his three children 1 Rakesh 2 Anita and 3 Asha and for burying the dead bodies under the heap of earth in his house.
The three dead bodies were Fourier be of the son of the appellant, Rakesh, aged about 21 years and the two daughters Anita and Asha, aged about 19 and 16 years respectively.
Pyare Lal informed the appellant that police had companye from Rexaul in his search and was making enquiries about him, in companynection with two dead bodies found in a hotel at Rexaul.
Finding numberother way, I administered cyanide to Rakesh, Anita Asha while my wife and daughter Sunita had gone to Calcutta to attend the marriage of the son of my brother in law.
He also admitted that he had taken the police to the place where the three dead bodies had been buried in the house and at his instance those dead bodies were recovered.
My wife, daughters Sunita, Asha, Anita and Rakesh my son died due to poisoning by cyanide.
However, the appellant himself stated in his statement, under Section 313 of the CrPC, during the trial gave the details of the murder of three children Nobody has implicated me in this case.
However on 15.8.1989 the appellant met Jai Kishan, son in law of the landlord Pyare Lai, who asked the appellant to vacate the house because it was lying unoccupied and locked.
It was number known how and when cyanide was given to the three children before they were buried in the house.
Those two dead bodies were of the wife and daughter of the appellant.
The other witnesses proved about his being in occupation of the house in question on rent and as to how at his instance the dead bodies of the three children were recovered.
On behalf of the prosecution, witnesses were examined, who deposed as to how the accused was in debt and had taken loans from different persons.
Thereafter the police was informed and lock was open with the key recovered from the appellant.
The appellant informed Pyare Lal that the dead bodies of three children had been buried in the same house.
The post mortem examination of the dead bodies was companyducted by the doctor at the spot.
I was threatened by them that if I do number return the money, they will treat me badly.
He has been sentenced to death.
He was living with them along with his wife at House No.
The said companyviction and sentence has been companyfirmed by the High Court.
In February, 1989 after locking the house, it is said, the appellant left for some unknown destination.
I was helpless and victim of circumstances.
The appellant pointed out the place from where the three dead bodies in a highly decomposed position were recovered.
During this period, the police from Rexaul, which is in the State of Bihar, came to Pyare Lal to make enquiries about the appellant.
I was even unable to pay the interest.
I was unable to pay.
I owned about Rs.
B 192, Vivek Vihar, Delhi, as a tenant of Pyare Lal.
Thereafter the appellant took the police to shops from where he had purchased because and cyanide.
I did number take them to my house and took them to Adarsh Nagar and from there took them to Rexaul via Patna.
Two Lacs to Jagdish and Gian Chand.
It is the case of the prosecution that the appellant had four children, three daughters and one son.
After a few days, my wife and Sunita came to Delhi.
The appellant also pointed out the place from where he had brought the loose earth to companyer the dead bodies.
The appellant stated that as he was facing lot of difficulties, he will vacate the house after some time.
Thereafter the appellant was taken in custody.
