Consequently, an enquiry was ordered against the petitioner.
5641/96 the High Court dismissed the petition in limine, Thus this Special Leave Petition.
5 SCR 536 The following Order of the Court was delivered This is one of the classic instances of numberoriety in huge companyruption in running the public Corporations.
He was charged for number issuing tickets to 34 passengers while he was oh duty in the U.P. Road Transport Corporation bus.
The order of removal was companyfirmed on appeal.
While the enquiry was pending before the impartial officers, companytrary to the instructions issued, it was transferred to the departmental officer.
According to the learned companynsel, instructions had been issued by the Corporation to transfer the departmental enquiry to the independent agencies, like retired judicial officers.
The Services Tribunal dis missed the petition and in the impugned order dated February 13, 1996 made in W.P. No.
Charge sheet was given and he was removed from service on December 8, 1989 after it Was found that he was guilty of the charge.
1996 Supp.
The petitioner was a Conductor.
When it was checked, it was found that the petitioner had given tickets only to 19 passengers out of 53 and 34 passengers were travelling as numbertickets were issued to them.
Shri Upadhyay, learned companynsel for the petitioner, companytended that there was a flagrant violation of departmental instructions in companyducting the enquiry against the petitioner.
