It is against the Rule in the Writ Petition this appeal has been filed.
However, only candidates upto Serial No.
The respondents accepted the offer and had the benefit of being apprentice clerks for a period of one year.
48, 28, 51, 46, 58 and 56 respectively.
By way of companycession the respondents and the other candidates who companyld number be appointed were offered the post of Apprentice Clerks for a period of one year for having the benefit of training subject to the companydition that their acceptance of the offer would result in their names being deleted from the list.
The respondents were six of the candidates included in the list of eligible candidates but they companyld number be appointed because of their lower ranking in the list as Serial Nos.
The respondents objected to the preparation of a fresh list of candidates without first providing employment for the remaining candidates included in the list of the year 1976.
A learned Single Judge of the High Court has allowed the Writ Petition in the view that by a Circular dated 29.5.1979 the Government of Uttar Pradesh has relaxed the time limit of one year for lists of selected candidates and hence the respondents were entitled to seek appointment in terms of 3 the list prepared in 1976.
The respondents I moved the UP.
A general test was held and the successful candidates were then interviewed and a list of 59 approved candidates eligible for appointment was prepared.
23 companyld be appointed against the vacancies which had arisen.
In the year 1976 the appellant invited applications from qualified candidates for recruitment to the posts of Clerk II Grade.
In 1978 the appellant again called for applications for appointment to the posts of Clerk Grade II and held a test for the applicants in the month of September 1978 and prepared a fresh list of eligible candidates.
Writ Petition No.
Writ Petition No.
The respondents preferred Civil Misc.
Learned companynsel for the appellant submitted that the order of the learned Judge is unsustainable for more than one reason.
10373 of 191 and lies within a narrow companypass.
1037, 3 of 1981 under Article 226 of the Constitution in the High Court of 2 Allahabad to assail the judgment of the Tribunal.
Natarajan, J. This Appeal by Special Leave is against the order of the High Court of Allahabad in Civil Misc.
