Feeling aggrieved by the said judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court the appellant has filed this appeal.
On the same date, i.e., 7 9 1995, an application in Form No.
Feeling aggrieved by the said order, the appellant filed a writ petition WP No.
The learned Single Judge directed the respondents to reconsider the mattes and pass the appropriate orders keeping in view the said judgment.
The appellant submitted his reply to the said objections but the appropriate authority, by order dated 11 12 1995, held that in view of the prohibition in.
On 7 9 1995 the appellant entered into an agreement with the executors of Shri S.R. Unger for the purchase of urban property in the city of Madras number Chennai for a sum of Rs.
37 I was filed before the appropriate authority, Madras.
The respondent filed an appeal WA No.
17773 of 1995 in the Madras High Court which was allowed by a learned Single Judge by his judgment dated 3 4 1996.
The appropriate authority addressed a letter dated 30 10 1995 to the intending transferors and transferees seeking certain clarifications in respect of nine points mentioned in the said letter.
429 of 1996 against the said judgment of the learned Single Judge which has been allowed by the Division Bench of the High Court by the impugned judgment dated 21 6 1996.
5,50,00,000.
The extent of the property is 23.5 grounds companyprising 5239 sq mt of vacant land and 954 sq mt of built up area.
