So far as P.W.2 Faizul Hussain is companycerned, he has named accused Manik Keot and Jaharlal Bhor.
P.W.4 has named accused Sheo Prasad Bhor, Champalal Bhor and Jaharlal Bhor.
The police registered a case and during investigation the dead body was recovered from the river and thereafter it was sent for post mortem examination.
Similarly, P.W.7 has also mentioned that accused Sheo Prasad Bhor was there and participated in the assault.
P.W.3 has also named accused Manik Keot and Jaharlal Bhor in the Court though number before the Police and number before the Magistrate.
W I T H Criminal Appeal No, 1272 of 2005 Jaharlal Bhor Vs.
He has also stated that accused Jaharlal also gave a baitha blow to the deceased and accused Champalal Bhor gave a dagger blow and when he tried to intervene, he was threatened by accused Sheo Prasad Bhor.
He also mentioned the name of Jaharlal Bhor before the Magistrate and the companyrt.
27 of 2007 Special Leave Petition Crl.
P.W. 6 has also alleged that Champalal Bhor, Manik Keot and Sheo Prasad Bhor were lifting Rehmat Ali from the spot and were dragging him to the bank of the river.
The trial companyrt found that it was number necessary to record any separate sentence under Sections 147/149/201, I.P.C. and sentenced the accused persons under Section 304, Part II, I.P.C. only as it was observed that it was sufficient to meet the ends of justice.
Brief facts giving rise to these appeals are that on 8.6.1991, Smt.
1169 of 2006 Manik Keot Vs.
State of Assam K. MATHUR, J. Leave granted in S.L.P. Crl No.1169 of 2006.
State of Assam Criminal Appeal No.
On companypletion of investigation, a case was registered against the accused persons under Sections 147, 302, 201 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code for short, I.P.C. On companypletion of trial, learned Sessions Judge recorded companyviction under Sections 147, 149, 304 Part II and 201, I.P.C. against the accused persons and sentenced them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six years and to pay a fine of Rs.2000/ each, in default to suffer further imprisonment for two years.
These appeals are directed against the Judgment and Order dated 2.4.2005 passed by learned Single Judge of the Gauhati High Court High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Nizoram and Arunachal Pradesh whereby learned Single Judge has dismissed the appeals of the accused persons and companyfirmed the companyviction and sentence of the accused persons.
Rani Begum lodged a first information report that her husband, Rehmat Ali went out of the house around 8.00 a.m. for fishing and around 11.00 a.m. she was informed by Mina Begum that her husband had been killed by accused Manik Keot, Brajanath Kurmi and Jaharlal Kurmi and the dead body was packed into a gunny bag and thrown into a river.
Aggrieved against this order a joint appeal was filed before the High Court.
His statement was sought to be companytroverted by P.W.9 Investigating Officer.
