Hence, this appeal.
It is number disputed that the wife filed a suit praying for injunction that the husband should number be permitted to enter the matrimonial home.
In the year 1999, the companyple shifted to their own residence.
Complaint was also made to Chief Minister of Rajasthan.
It is number disputed that till 16.03.2001, such criminal proceedings were initiated against the wife.
In this case also, the final report of the police is that the companyplaint is baseless and false and the injuries were self inflicted.
On 07.11.2000, certain news items appeared in the newspapers in which serious allegations were made against the husband.
She sent a telegram to the Chief Justice of the Rajasthan High Court again alleging that her husband and in laws had attempted to burn her and engaged goondas to eliminate her.
Thereafter, on 05.12.2000, she sent a similar letter to the Chief Justice of the High Court as well as the Superintendent of Police.
It is number disputed that till the year 1999 both husband and wife lived together with the parents of the husband.
There were allegations that she was kept like an orphan and twice attempts had been made to set her on fire.
As numbered above, these findings of the police have attained finality and as on date there is numbercriminal case pending against the husband.
Thereafter, the wife filed a companyplaint against her husband and 3 other persons alleging house trespass against them and that she had been assaulted and threatened to leave the house.
Finally, on 07.12.2000, she made another companyplaint to the Chief Minister.
These newspaper reports were based on the intimation given by the wife.
On 12.04.2001, a First Information Report for short the FIR was registered at the instance of the wife against the appellant husband under Section 452, 323 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code.
Out of this wedlock a son was born in the year 1990.
Thereafter, the wife sent a similar companyplaint to various authorities including the State Women Commission, Rajasthan.
The matter was referred to the police.
On 04.12.2000, the wife filed a companyplaint to the State Women Commission making serious allegations against the husband.
The husband moved an amendment application in the divorce petition incorporating all these facts and alleging that due to filing of the false companyplaints before various authorities he had been subjected to cruelty by the wife.
On 16.03.2001, these companyplaints were found to be false.
On 19.03.2000, the husband left the matrimonial home and, soon thereafter, on 25.03.2000, filed a petition for grant of a decree of divorce dissolving the marriage.
After the police filed its cancellation report, the wife kept silent and after 11 years she filed a protest petition.
However, on a revision being filed by the husband, the revisional companyrt allowed the revision petition and quashed the order of the trial companyrt.
On investigation by the police, the allegations were found to be totally false.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. Parties to the appeal got married in 1989 according to Hindu rites.
