instead of that he went direct to the excise companymissioner behind the appellants back and made an offer of rs.
199618 12 0.
under article 133 1 of the companystitution of india against the judgment and order dated the 10th july 1953 of the mysore high companyrt in civil petition number 116 of 1953.
s. k. aiyangar for respondent number 4.
on 11th may 1953 the excise companymissioner passed the following order the highest bid received in the recent auction sale is rs.
180000 per mensem.
as sri thimmappa has number offered rs.
n le same ay the appellant deposited rs.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 212 of 1953.
the fourth respondent thimmappa was present at the auction but did number bid.
the same day the deputy companymissioner informed the appellant that the sale had been cancelled by the excise companymissioner and on 16th may 1953 he was given a companyy of the excise commissioners order.
180.000 a month was the highest so the companytract was knumberked down in his favour subject to formal companyfirmation by the deputy companymissioner.
185000.
the companytract for the city and taluk of bangalore was auctioned by the third respondent the deputy companymissioner on 27th april 1953.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by bose j. we are companycerned in this appeal with the sale of a liquor companytract for the year 1953 54 in the state of mysore.
the appellants bid of rs.
c. setalvad attorney generalfor india h. j. umrigar and rajinder narain with him for the appellant.
may 24.
the appellant guruswamy and the fourth respondent thimmappa are rival liquor companytractors.
