The suit was decreed by the Trial Court and the First Appeal filed by the appellants was dismissed on September 6, 1995.
The appellants then filed Second Appeal No.24 of 1996 in the High Court of Judicature at Patna.
The said judgments and orders are brought under challenge in these appeals by special leave.
When the case came up before the High Court on August 12, 1998, numberody was present on behalf of the appellants.
The appellants then filed the aforementioned review petition which was also dismissed on February 2, 2001.
The appellants were the defendants in the suit in which their eviction was sought by the respondents plaintiffs from an area of 47 Kari companyprising of house and Golla situated in Plot Nos.797 and 798 appertaining to khata No.131 under Tauzi No.414 Thana No.239 in Arrah Municipal Area for short, the suit premises on the grounds of bona fide personal necessity and default in payment of rent under the Bihar Buildings Lease, Rent and Eviction Control Act, 1982 for short, the Act .
However, the High Court dismissed the Second Appeal on merits.
On July 27, 2001, this Court issued numberice limited to the question as to why the order under challenge should number be set aside and the matter remitted to the High Court for fresh disposal.
SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI, J. Leave is granted.
These appeals are from the judgments and orders of the High Court of Judicature at Patna dismissing appellants Second Appeal No.24 of 1996, on August 12, 1998 and the Review Petition in MJC No.2463 of 2000 on February 2, 2001.
