3 sprinkled kerosene oil upon her and appellant No.
20,000/ Rupees Twenty Thousand only to obtain a job in the State Transport Department for which he had applied on the 10th August, 1995.
It is number disputed that she was brought to the hospital by her neighbours and her husband appellant No.
1 held her, appellant No.
3 sprinkled kerosene oil upon her and appellant No.
The prosecution also examined PWs 7 and 8, the neighbourers who had helped in extinguishing the fire.
1 needed a sum of Rs.
There is, however, numberhing inconsistent between the two dying declarations.
The deceased also ran out of the house and raised an alarm which attracted several persons to the place of occurrence which included PW 7 Devidas and PW 8 Bansilal, another neighbour.
PW 1 Dayaram Salave is the person who recorded the second dying declaration.
The case of the prosecution is that later relatives of the deceased on companying to know of the incident came to see her at the hospital.
The deceased Rekhabi was married to the appellant No.
2 set her on fire with a match stick.
On the night of occurrence, according to the prosecution, while the deceased was sleeping she was called to the adjoining room and while appellant No.
1 held her, appellant No.
2 set her on fire.
In her report to the PSI PW 9 she stated that she was called by the appellants and while her husband appellant No.
On the latter companynt they have been sentenced to life imprisonment and to pay a fine of No.
2 was the father in law while appellant No.
The second dying declaration is to the same effect though specific role has number been assigned to the appellants as in the first dying declaration.
Both these witnesses were declared hostile since they resiled from their earlier statements made in the companyrse of investigation under Section 161 Cr.
The Police Sub Inspector PW 9 on getting information about the occurrence rushed to the hospital and recorded the statement of the deceased in the presence of treating physician PW 11.
After doing so they ran away.
The said report which was later treated as a dying declaration is said to have been recorded at 3.30 a.m. On the same day, a little later another dying declaration was recorded by a person numberinated to act as Executive Magistrate by the Tehsildar for the purpose of recording dying declarations.
The occurrence is alleged to have taken place on the night intervening 29 30 September, 1995 at about 2.30 a.m. The case of the prosecution is that the appellant No.
They threw a guilt on her and extinguished the fire.
1 and father in law appellant No.
Appellant No.
1 herein on May 01, 1995.
The deceased was removed to the local hospital for treatment.
3 was the mother in law of the deceased.
1,000/ each and in default to suffer further RI for one year.
P. Singh.
J. The appellants herein have impugned the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, dated 13.07.2005 in Criminal Appeal No.
He had asked his wife to companyvey the demand to her parents but the parents were unable to fulfill the said demand.
153/1996.
