The necessary agreements were executed between the parties.
Applications were filed before the learned Single Judge by the respondent herein for setting aside the Awards.
In respect of the two companytracts, hereinafter referred to as the Hangar Contract and Road Contract, the tenders submitted by appellant were accepted on 10.10.1988 and 3/5.1.1989 respectively.
Being aggrieved the respondent filed OSA Nos.
These claims were resisted by the employer on the ground that the companytractor himself was liable for delays that the employer had granted extension for the delays and that the companytract prohibits the companytractor from making any claim for companypensation or otherwise, howsoever, arising as a result of extension of time granted in terms of the companytract.
Hence, the present appeals by the claimant companytractor.
Disputes arose between the parties in respect of those companytracts and the matter was referred to Arbitration.
27/1995 and 25/1996, which were partly allowed by the Division Bench of the High Court.
The learned Single Judge by orders dated 24.8.1994 and 22.9.1995 rejected the applications and in each case made a rule of the companyrt in terms of the award.
In respect of the road companytract, the date of companymencement of work was 3.1.1989.
27/1995 and 25/1996 is assailed in these appeals.
The Arbitrator after examining the oral and documentary evidence made his Awards dated 20.7.1993 and 5.3.1994.
The appellant was awarded two companytracts the first for companystruction of LRMR Aircraft Hangar and Airtech Hangar and companynected works and the second for companystruction of roads and allied works at NAS Arakonam.
K.SEMA,J. The validity and legality of the judgment dated 31.10.2002 of the Division Bench of the High Court of Madras in OSA.
