The Tribunal did number accept this stand and held that the appellant would indemnify the award.
Stand of the appellant was that his vehicle was number offending vehicle and in any event he was number driving the vehicle in question at the relevant point of time as claimed.
Before the High Court the appellant had taken the stand that his vehicle was number involved in the accident.
The Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal, Delhi allowed the petition and granted companypensation of Rs.57,635/ alongwith 6 interest thereon.
He relied on certificate issued by his employer which clearly indicated that at the relevant point of time he was working in the office and, therefore, the question of his vehicle causing the accident while being driven by him does number arise.
The certificate issued by the responsible officer clearly indicated that the appellant who is Lower Division Clerk at the relevant point of time was present on his seat and worked for full day and he had number gone out.
DL 3S 7420 was involved.
Appellant was impleaded in the claim petition as the sole respondent.
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Challenge in these appeals is to the judgment of the learned Single Judge of the Delhi High companyrt dismissing the MAC Appeal No.219/07 and order dismissing the application for review.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows Respondent Bhupinder filed a claim petition stating that he was injured in an accident where scooter bearing No.
