Notice was issued in the writ petition.
Appellant filed a suit in the District Court on 28.03.2001.
In view of the companyduct of the petitioner and a material companycealment of fact, I am number inclined to entertain the writ petition.
The writ petition, however, was dismissed by a learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court by an order dated 29.11.2002, opining The petitioner has filed the present writ petition for issuance of a writ of mandamus for quashing the order dated 19th March, 2001 terminating the services of the petitioner.
However, without disclosing all these facts, the present writ petition was filed on 10th April, 2001.
A numberice was issued therein.
68 of 2003.
Admittedly, in the said writ petition, the fact in regard to pendency of the said suit was number disclosed.
There is number even a whisper in the writ petition about the civil suit.
Having failed to obtain any injunction in the civil suit, the Petitioner has resorted to filing the present writ petition.
She filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court on 10.04.2001.
It appears that numberex parte ad interim injunction was granted to the petitioner.
Appellant herein was an employee of the said Society which is a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India.
The said application allegedly companyld number be moved because of the strike resorted to by the lawyers.
Her application to withdraw the suit dated 12.04.2001 came up for companysideration before the Civil Court and upon a statement made by her, the same was permitted to be withdrawn by an order dated 30.04.2001.
Indian Council for Child Welfare is a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act and is governed by its Memorandum of Association as well as Rules and Regulations framed thereunder.
An application was filed for grant of injunction.
She was offered an appointment.
It is stated in the rejoinder affidavit that a civil suit was subsequently withdrawn but the relevant orders have number been filed along with the rejoinder affidavit.
However, before the writ petition came up for preliminary hearing, she filed an application for withdrawal of the suit on 12.04.2001.
2205 OF 2007 Arising out of SLP Civil No.
On or about 9.04.2001, only a numberice to the defendant was issued but numberorder of ad interim injunction was passed.
Her services, however, were terminated allegedly without companyplying with the principles of natural justice despite the fact that she was companyfirmed in her service.
CIVIL APPEAL NO.
With a view to advert to the said question, we may numberice the admitted facts.
9283 of 2006 B. SINHA, J Leave granted.
How far and to what extent suppression of fact by way of number disclosure would affect a persons right of access to justice is the question involved in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 23.07.2003 passed by the High Court of Delhi in LPA No.
