After sniffing the place of occurrence, taking the round of the house and also sniffing the handkerchief lying on the face of the deceased, the dogs companyld number identify anyone present there.
Mrinal Kanti Roy, the Investigating Officer, who was later examined as PW 13, companymenced his investigation.
What do you say?
All the sentences shall run companycurrently.
P.4 and P.5 respectively.
The case was companymitted to the Court of Sessions by the learned Magistrate vide order dated 28th November, 1999.
2, who was arrested on 11th July, 1999 from Jugi Battala and he also, during investigation, made a statement leading to the recovery of two wrist watches as well as camera.
About the accused knowing the family as well as how they used to open the entrance door she stated as under These two accused persons in the lock up were occasionally engaged by us as hired labours for watering the flower tubs at roof top and cleaning the cars and for carrying drinking water.
16 Officer in charge stated that dog of Police, first sniffed the hanky and then showed you and he became sure that the handkerchief was yours.
The house was ransacked.
On 28th April, 1999 at Police Station Jadavpur, a case was registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code hereinafter referred to as IPC against unknown miscreants for causing death of one Smt.
It came and stated before me.
Aggrieved from the judgment of guilt and order of sentence dated 6.12.2000, the appellants filed an appeal before the High Court.
An attempt was made to recover jewellery from the shop, which was raided, but numberhing companyld be recovered.
The camera was recovered on the statement of the said accused from village Jhijrait for which the seizure memo Ext.
During investigation this appellant made a statement, which led to the recovery of wrist watches, which were allegedly looted from the house of the deceased.
P.C. the learned Sessions Judge, by a detailed judgment, companyvicted both the accused and punished them as under Both the companyvicts are produced from J.C. They are given hearing with regard to question of sentence u s 235 2 Cr.
Thereafter inquest of the deceased was taken with the help of the relatives.
1 on 8th July, 1999 from village Khasiara.
The body was taken to Mominpur Police Morgue by the companystable where the post mortem of the deceased was companyducted and the report is Ext.
It appears from the said report that traces of saliva was detected in the item A handkerchief and item B floor scrapings and floor swab in companyton wool.
He also informed about the involvement of accused Mir Ismile, Appellant No.
Phul Guha was in the house alone at 21.35 hrs.
The watches were recovered vide recovery memo Ext.6.
So I shall have to rely on the other evidence on record.
5 was also prepared.
myself along with my son Debmalya and daughter in law Indira left for Gariahat for some personal work.
16 and answer thereof No.
What do you say?
Phool Guha, wife of Dr. Ashim Guha, resident of 11/1 East Road within Jadavpur Police Station.
The companyvicts plead mercy.
From the place of occurrence certain articles were recovered and seizure memos were prepared whereafter both the rooms at the upper floor of the house were locked.
P.1 which reads as under To The Officer in Charge Jadavpur, P.S. Dist.
Upon entering the house, they found that Phool Guha was lying dead inside the room of her daughter in law with tongue protruded and with some marks of bruises on her body and blood trickling out of her mouth.
A. 27 He did number give me any companyy and he also did number go with me.
The dog squad was brought to the place of occurrence.
When they returned home at about 9.30 P.M. they found a large gathering in front of the house.
After some enquiry and investigation, the Investigating Officer arrested Sanatan Naskar, Appellant No.
This case was registered on the basis of the companyplaint made by Dr. Ashim Guha Ext.
The accused are identified.
After trial and recording of the statements of the accused under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code hereinafter referred to as Cr.
P.C. The companyvicts are informed that the sentence u s 302/34 I.P.C. which has been established yesterday is life imprisonment or death penalty and the sentence for companymitting robbery u s 392 I.P.C. is imprisonment for 10 years and the sentence for having possession of the looted property u s 411 I.P.C. is 3 years.
The Investigating Officer then recorded the statements of number of witnesses, but in particular Jahar Chatterjee Kakuji PW5 , Indira Guha PW6 , Ali Anam PW8 and Biplab Talukdar PW9 respectively and after companypletion of the investigation, a charge sheet under Sections 302/411/34 IPC was filed before the Court of companypetent jurisdiction.
Yours faithfully, Sd Asim Kumar Guha As is evident from the above companyplaint that Dr. Ashim Guha, husband of the deceased, his son Debmalya and daughter in law Indira had left for Garihat on 28th April, 1999 at about 8.15 P.M. The deceased was all alone at home.
For these reasons the appellants claim acquittal from charge.
To examine the merits of these companytentions reference to the case of the prosecution and the facts, as they emerged from the record, would be necessary.
In relation to recovery of the items from him he was questioned by the Court to which he offered the following answer Q. 27 That witness had stated that on that day at about 1.30 clock in the afternoon he along with the officer in charge Anu Alam and you went to the house of Kartick Naskar at Gangaduara.
It transpired that the assailants companymitted the murder of his wife and had ransacked both the rooms as the household articles were lying scattered.
They wiped the swet of my armpit and gave that to the Dog.
Village boarding in a police jeep and you recovered two wrist watches, one H.M.T. and one Titan Wrist watch all tied in a packet.
Inspector prepared the seizure list in front of this witness and Anuu Alam and you took a companyy of the by putting your thumb impression.
The inmate of the house used to companye to balcony to identified the companyer and in case he appears to be known man, the key in usually lowered by a string when the companyer opens then door and on his entering recock the same and returned the key.
He admitted his guilt in companymission of the crime as well as identified the handkerchief recovered as his own.
All the articles were identified by her as Ex.
There were losts of people alongwith the Police Dog.
south 24 Parganas Sir, This is to inform you, that on 28.4.99 at aroud 20.15 hrs.
The saliva and blood staines, where the body was found, were also seized by scraping floor and separate seizure memo was prepared and marked as Ext.
The photographs were taken.
My wife Smt.
He called for experts including dog squad.
She specifically stated that she would be able to identify the wrist watches and the camera and she gave the make of wrist watches and camera i.e. HMT and Titan wrist watches and Paintax camera.
blood soaked filter paper was stained with B group blood.
My mother in law also used their rickswa for visits.
