The appellant did number companycede his demand.
This award is questioned by the appellant before us.
He claimed to be a permanent employee and also demanded the Drivers scale of Rs, 90 5 165 plus dearness allowance.
The award directs the appellant to make Kailash Kumar a permanent employee and to give him the scale of Rs.
He was employed as a temporary hand some time in 1962.
Accordingly the area supervisors and blocks supervisors were made permanent.
The case of the appellant before Labour Court was that the Hind Mazdoor Sabha, U.P. Branch was number companypetent to expouse the dispute because it has numbercommunity of interest with the workmen of the appellant.
Labour Court has given an award in favour of Kailash Kumar on August 9, 1968.
It appears that the case of Kailash Kumar was espoused by Hind Mazdoor Sabha, U.P. Branch.
According to them, Mazdoor Sabha, U.P. Branch was companypetent to expouse the dispute.
The State Government referred the dispute for adjudication to Labour Court, Meerut.
The workmen have companytroverted this plea.
Dwivedi, J. One Kailash Kumar is employed as a Jeep Driver with the appellant in its factory at Ghaziabad.
