P.C. after the respondents application for discharge was unsuccessful.
Charge was framed by learned Special Judge by order dated 16.9.1997 holding that there was infringement of the provisions of Vegetable Oil Products Control Order, 1947 in short the Control Order as amended under Section 3 1 of the Act.
A challan under Section 173 of the Code was filed in the Court of Special Judge, Sangrur and the present respondents and aforesaid Prem Mohan Tiwari were arrayed as accused persons.
While the accused Prem Mohan Tiwari was the Production Manager of the companypany, others were Directors of the companypany.
A three Judge Bench in Rajlakshmi Mills v. Shakti Bhakoo 2002 8 SCC 236 held as follows The appellant had filed a criminal companyplaint against the respondent as well as her brother in law Anoop Bhakoo under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act because of dishonour of a cheque which had been issued by M s Sutlez Knitwears of which Anoop Bhakoo and the respondent were partners.
Samples of the vegetable oil product were drawn from the premises of M s Sangrur Vanaspati Mills Ltd. on 29.4.1992 and on analysis the sample was found to companytain 78 of solvent mustard oil as against the permitted limit of 20.
The State of Punjab questions legality of the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Criminal Revision No.326 of 1998.
No.4360/2003 ARIJIT PASAYAT, J Leave granted.
Against the summoning order passed by the Magistrate, the respondent filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.
Arising out of SLP Crl.
