A large number of witnesses were examined before the Enquiry Officer.
Board Group A Board Director Board c.d.e.
He participated in the enquiry proceeding without any demur whatsoever.
By reason of a judgment and order dated 23rd June, 2005 a learned Single Judge of the said Court dismissed the writ petition.
Appellant preferred an appeal thereagainst before the Board itself on or about 4th December, 1998.
The imputation of charges against her pertained to sanction and disbursal of amount of loan in four cases.
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3404 OF 2008 Arising out of SLP C No.
A finding of guilt was arrived at by the said Enquiry Officer, a companyy whereof was made available to the appellant.
Board Appellant did number raise any objection in regard to the appointment of the Enquiry Officer.
The said appeal was treated to be a petition for review which by reason of an order dated 2nd March, 1999 was dismissed.
As many as four charges were framed against her.
A disciplinary proceeding was initiated against her in April, 1996.
An intra companyrt appeal was preferred thereagainst which has been dismissed by a Division Bench of the said High Court by reason of the impugned judgment and order dated 22nd February, 2006.
They were cross examined.
Respondent Corporation was companystituted under the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 1951 Act .
Appellant examined witnesses on her own behalf.
The records of the disciplinary proceeding were placed before the Board of Directors of the Corporation.
14803 of 2006 V. Nirmala Appellant Versus Karnataka State Financial Corporation Ors.
By an order dated 9th June, 1998 a penalty of dismissal from services was imposed upon her.
Aggrieved by and dissatisfied therewith, the appellant filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore.
The disciplinary proceeding was initiated by the Managing Director of Corporation, wherein one Sri B. Rudregowda, a legal advisor of the companypany, was appointed as an Enquiry Officer on 4th July, 1996.
Respondents JUDGMENT B. SINHA, J. Leave granted.
Appellant was appointed as Trainee Assistant Manager in the Corporation in June 1983.
It is idle to companytend that had Managing Director passed an order, an appeal companyld have been preferred thereagainst.
She was promoted and posted as Branch Manager at Chikkaballapur Branch.
