1921 act iii off 1922 .
appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated april 26 1965 of the madras high companyrt in a.a.o.
on march 12 1959 the respondent filed a suit for his eviction.
the appellant challenges the findings of the high court on both points.
the present appeal has been filed after obtaining special leave.
on the expiry of the lease the appellant refused to vacate the land.
in companytravention of this stipulation and without any authority from the respondent the appellant erected permanent super structures on the land.
he filed an application under sec.
the trial companyrt decreed the suit on august 25 1960.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 776 of 1966.
before filing his written statement on february 15 1960.
sen m. srinivasan and r. thiagarajan for the respondent.
the backyard companysisted of vacant land.
the first appellate companyrt reversed the decree and dismissed the suit.
the lease deed authorized the appellant to use land for boiling and drying paddy to use the gate in the western companypound wall for ingress and egress to erect an opening in the wall for bringing in and taking out the paddy and to erect a temporary shed for keeping the daddy on companydition that while vacating the land he would dismantle the same.
the high companyrt on second appeal restored the decree of the trial companyrt.
the deed specifically provided that the appellant should number.erect any kind of permanent super.structures on the said vacant site so as to entitle him to claim in future the value thereof except such facilities as were necessary for drying daddy at his own expense.
the appellant c1aimed protection under the madras city tenants protection act.
9 of the act asking for an order that the respondent be directed to sell the land for a price to be fixed by the court.
number 1 of 1962.
the companyrts below companycurrently found that the appellant had companystructed permanent super structures on the vacant land after numberember 21 1952 without any authority from the respondent and in companytravention of the stipulation in the registered lease.
c. manchanda and t. a. ramachandran for the appellant.
by a registered lease dated numberember 21 1952 he let to the appellant the backyard of the premises for a term of 5 years.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by bachawat j. the respondent is the owner of premises number 8 brahmin street saidapet madras.
