685/2007 whereby and whereunder the application filed by him under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, questioning the legality or validity of the order dated 5.7.2000 passed by learned 1st Additional Civil Judge, Roorkee, was dismissed.
The Nayab Tehsildar, Roorkee was asked to make an inquiry into the said allegations by the Sub Divisional Magistrate in terms of his letter dated 31st August, 1996.
The inquiry report was submitted on 11.9.1996 and pursuant thereto or in furtherance thereof, a first information report was lodged by the Naiab Tehsildar, Roorkee on 4.12.1996.
Appellant herein filed an application for recall of the said order, inter alia on the premise that the said order was barred by limitation.
Appellant is before us aggrieved by and dissatisfied with a judgment and order dated 20.9.2007 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Uttarakhand in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.
Appellant was elected as Gram Pradhan of Village Salempur in the year 1989 and remained on the said post till 1995.
A charge sheet was filed by the Investigating Officer.
By an order dated 15.7.1998 companynizance was taken by the learned Magistrate under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code.
Indisputably, 95 persons, most of whom belonged to the Scheduled Caste, had been occupying the land of the Gram Panchayat.
In or around March 1993, the appellant purported to have granted settlement of the lands occupied by them, after taking Rs.
He, however, in the meanwhile had initiated a proceeding for their eviction and they were evicted from the lands occupied by them.
10,000 from each of the allottees.
Leave granted.
