her after the death of her husband would number be recovered.
1200/ per annum on May 23, 1942.
This grant of Rs.
It appears that after the death of her husband it was decided in December 1953 that numberpayment should be made to her thereafter and the regular payments received by.
2400/ with an addition of Rs.
1500/ per annum was companytinued to be received by the petitioner through Bikaner Treasury upto the, formation of the State of Rajasthan, on April 7, 1949.
610 of 1970 may alone be sufficient.
The petitioner states that in view of the near relationship as well as in lieu of her husbands share in the parental Jagir of Riri the Maharaja of Bikaner sanctioned a separate cash grant to her husband, Maharaj Chander Singh ji, of Rs.
Ms order is dated June 5, 1958.
125/per month to the petitioner from the date the same had been dis companytinued till the cash jagirs are resumed.
600/ as dearness allowance was shared between her and her husband under the order of the Prime Minister of Bikaner State dated September 18, 1942.
2400/ per annum with effect from February 2, 1943.
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petitions Nos.
610 to 614 of 1970.
M. Singhvi and S. M. Jain, for the respondents.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by GOSWAMI, J. By the above Writ Petitions the companystitutional validity of the Rajasthan Cash Jagirs Abolition Act, 1958 Act No.
This amount was companytinuously paid to her husband by the State of Bikaner and was later raised to Rs.
Mohan Behari Lal, for the petitioners.
32 of the Constitution of India.
After the death of her husband on May 6, 1951, the payment of her grant was companytinued.
Petition under Art.
The State of Rajasthan being the successor to the former Bikaner State recognised this grant and companytinued to make payment to the petitioner.
The facts of Writ Petition No.
29 of 1958 is challenged as violative of the petitioners, fundamental rights under articles 14, 19 1 f and 31 of the Constitution.
