hence this appeal.
1, Rajesh, filed a suit for the redemption of his mortgage against respondent No.2, Prem Shanker, which was decreed.
The High Court upheld the Executing Courts order following the said Full Bench decision of the M.P. High Court.
The present appellants also moved an application objections under order 21, Rule 97 P.C. resisting that they cannot be dispossessed in terms of the said decree, as they were number parties to the said suit number they are deriving any right and title through the Judgement debtor.
The objection was negatived by the trial companyrt, appellate companyrt, and even by the High Court in the second appeal.
They claim separate and independent legal right, number affected either by the mortgage or redemption of the mortgage.
The decree directed the delivery of vacant possession of the mortgaged property to the applicant Respondent No.1 .
In the said suit, admittedly, the present appellants were number parties.
the present appellants were number parties to the suit number there is any decree against them.
The appellants case is they were number parties to those proceedings.
