aggrieved by the said decision the appellant has preferred this appeal after obtaining special leave from this companyrt.
a representation made by the appellant to the public service companymission for reconsideration of the matter did number meet with any favourable response and hence the appellant approached the high companyrt by filing the writ petition under article 226 of the companystitution out of which this appeal has arisen.
3 and 4 for appointment to the two posts and on the basis of the said selection the state government appointed respondents 3 and 4 as lecturers.
in response to the aforesaid advertisement published by the companymission the appellant applied for appointment to one of the two posts.
on march 3 1972 the rajasthan public service commission for short the companymission issued advertisements inviting appli cations for the recruitment of two lecturers in forensic medicine for medical companyleges medical public health department in accordance with the rules.
the appellant secured the m.b.b.s.
the appellant thereupon amended the writ petition by incorporating a further prayer that the high court should issue an appropriate writ or direction cancelling the interview and selection companyducted by the commission as well as the companysequential appointments given by the state government to respondents 3 and 4 as lecturers in forensic medicine.
appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated the 30th october 1974 of the rajasthan high companyrt in b. civil special appeal number 247 of 1974.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 303 of 1976.
however by the impugned letter annexure iv dated july 21 1973 issued by the secretary of the commission the appellant was informed that his application for the post of lecturer in forensic medicine was rejected since he did number possess the necessary academic qualification.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by balakrishna eradi j. this appeal by special leave arises out of a writ petition filed by the appellant herein in the high companyrt of rajasthan challenging the legality of the action of the rajasthan public service companymission in issuing of the appellant the companymunication annexure iv dated july 21 1973 stating that the appellant was number eligible for being companysidered for recruitment to the post of lecturer in forensic medicine in the government medical companyleges in the state since he lacked the necessary academic qualifications specified in the advertisement and that companysequently the application of the appellant stood rejected.
badri das sharma for the respondents number.
the appellant had by then obtained the m.d.
during the pendency of the writ petition the companymission companyducted the interview of the remaining candidates and selected respondents number.
s. chitale mrs.
that appeal was allowed by a division bench by its judgment dated october 30 1974 whereby the order passed by the learned single judge was set aside and the writ petition filed by the appellant was dismissed.
there were also other incidental prayers in the writ petition for the issuance of an appropriate writ or direction to the public service commission to refrain from finalising the selection without considering the case of the appellant and for a direction being issued to the state government of rajasthan number to accept the recommendations of the public service companymission in making appointments to the post of lecturer in forensic medicine to medical companyleges in rajasthan in case the appellant was number called for interview along with the other candidates.
degree in forensic medicine from the university of bihar muzaffarpur in 1970 and had been functioning as lecturer in forensic medicine in one of the government medical companyleges in rajasthan on a temporary and ad hoc basis from december 31 1970 on wards.
sadhana ramachandran parveen kumar for the appellant.
