The tenants did number avail the opportunity granted to them for deposit of the arrears of rent and instead preferred a second revision petition being CRP No.3210 of 1984 in the High Court of Kerala which was dismissed on 4.2.1987 holding that after the dismissal of the first revision petition the second revision in the High Court was number maintainable.
The application was dismissed on 29.9.1992 holding that the rent had number been deposited in time and that the application filed by the tenants was barred by res judicata.
However, a period of two months was fixed by the companyrt for vacating the order of eviction if the tenants deposited the arrears of rent in terms of Section 11 2 c of the Act.
The respondents thereafter filed the application under Article 227 of the Constitution which was disposed of by the order impugned in these appeals.
Thereafter the respondents tenants filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution which was registered as O.P. No.5970 of 1987.
The appeal preferred against the order of the Rent Control Court was dismissed by the Appellate Authority on 30th March, 1995.
Not being satisfied with the deposit in terms of Section 11 2 c of the Act they themselves moved an application in the Rent Control Court with a prayer for vacating the order of eviction on deposit of arrears of rent made by them on 24th October, 1991.
The said application was dismissed on 7.7.1987.
Despite dismissal of the application for extension of time for deposit of arrears of rent, neither the arrears were paid number the said order was challenged in any appropriate proceedings.
They also moved IA No.756 of 1987 before the District Court, Kottayam, the revisional authority for extension of time for the deposit of the rent.
