Impugned proceedings were issued to recover the said amount paid to him on the premise that he was number entitled to the advance increments more than two.
the authorities went on giving revision of the pay scale granting advance increments as and when he acquired the qualification on the pay scale applicable at the relevant time.
Present Honble Mr. Justice K. Ramaswamy Honble Mr. Justice D.P. Wadhwa Prakash Reddy and Mrs.D.B. Reddy, Advs.
After his passing secondary Grade Degree Training Examination in the year 1967, he was granted on December 1,1967 SGBT scale of Rs.80 150 w.e.f.
for the appellant Anil Kumar, Adv.
In view of the fact that the appellant went on improving his qualifications for B.A, M.A., B.Ed.
grade II/320 14 Degree b Degree with One Increment Schell Asst.
for the Respondents.
One Increment for M.Ed.
460 15 in 580 Teaching c post Graduate Two Increment Ed.
Under these circumstances, the authorities have wrongly applied the G.O.Ms.
We have heard learned companynsel on both sides.
O R D E R The following Order of the Court was delivered Leave granted.
One Increment for M.A. or equivalent post Graduate Degree.
qualifications.
One Increment for B.Ed.
Thus, this appeal by special leave.
the aforesaid date.
They have stated in the illustration as under Sl.
of post scale of tions for cation for eligibility Advance pay the post to advance Increments Increments allowed 1 2 3 4 5 6 Trained Graduate Degree a Post Graduate One Increment teachers and with B.Ed.
Category Revised Qualifica Additional Qualifi No.
and M.Ed.,
The Additional financial companyent involved to the management in the implementation of these orders will be companysidered for assessment of teaching grants due to the schools under GRANT IN AID.
Admittedly, he is number having the post of junior Lecturer which requires the M.A. qualification and, therefore, he is only entitled to two additional increments, namely, for acquiring his M.A. and M.Ed.
This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad, made on August 19,1996 in OA No.
The Tribunal has dismissed the petition.
On the basis thereof, the appellant is entitled to only two additional increments, namely, one increment for M.A. and thereafter one for M.Ed.
of No.
The Government in G.O.Ms No.
2944/93.
The appellant was originally appointed as a Teacher Head Master in a private aided school on November 9, 1959 in the scale of Rs.45 120.
with M.Ed.
