In one incident, there was a mutual altercation between the prosecution witnesses and some of the accused persons in the companyrse of which there was an exchange of brickbats as a result of which some grievous injuries were caused to witnesses Hazari, Bhanna, Dhanna and Bhima.
Despite a request made by the deceased number to assault them Shivaji is said to have fired at the deceased as a result of which he fell down and died.
Thereafter the companyplainant party wanted to go to Police Station to lodge a report of this incident and whilst they were on the way, they were alleged to have been surrounded by the appellants.
It appears that two main incidents took place in the companyrse of which some of the prosecution witnesses were assaulted and the deceased was killed.
The State of Madhya Pradesh filed an appeal before the High Court against the order of the Sessions Judge acquit ting the appellants and the High Court accepted the appeal, companyvicted the appellants as mentioned .in its judgment.
One of the appellants was armed with a gun and the object of the appellants appeared to have been to prevent the other party from going to the Police Station.
The case came up before the Sessions Judge who after companysidering the evidence, acquitted all the accused persons, and rejected the prosecution case.
A F.I.R. was lodged on the basis of which investigation was made.
