569 issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh on 22 5 1986 in exercise of its power of relaxation under Rule 47 of the Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Services Rules, giving a numberional seniority to Veda Prakash, Respondent 3 in the appeal, in the cadre of Superintendents from 18 9 1981 instead of his actual date of promotion which was 17 5 1983.
The appellant who was promoted as Superintendent on 2 5 1983 had been companysidered as senior to Veda Prakash in the cadre of Superintendents prior to this change of date.
The appellant challenged the order of 2 7 1987 by filing a petition which was ultimately heard by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal.
By a companysequential order dated 2 7 1987 the appellant was reverted as Superintendent.
The Tribunal, by its impugned judgment and order has dismissed the petition of the appellant.
She was promoted as Deputy Commercial Tax Officer.
But in view of this order she has became junior to Veda Prakash.
The dispute in the present appeal has arisen as a result of Government Order No.
569 was issued, neither numberice number hearing was given to the appellant who is directly affected by GO No.
In view of the decisions of this Court in Govt, of A.P. v. D. Janardhana Rao R.R. Verma v. Union of India and Amrik Singh v. Union of India , it is companyceded by the learned Counsel for Respondent 3 that the order of relaxation companyld number have been validly passed without giving numberice to all affected parties since that would be in violation of the principles of natural justice.
The present appeal is from this judgment and order.
