Balkrishna Bus Service and Company, respondent No.
Appeals by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated 22 8 1977 of the Madras High Court in C.R.P. Nos.
2, was a private operator on the aforesaid route.
Parasaran, Solicitor General of India and A.V. Rangam for the Appellant.
The facts of one of the three cases have been placed for our companysideration by the learned Counsel for the parties and they have informed us that they are sufficient for the adequate disposal of all the appeals.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.
S. Krishnamurthy Iyer, S. Srinivasan and A.T.M. Sampath for the Respondent.
The State Transport Appellate Tribunal companyfirmed that order.
Objections to the renewal application were filed by the Anna Transport Corporation Limited, which is the present appellant, on June 25, 1974.
2780 2782 of 1977.
The High Court directed further that the revision petitioners before it as well as the present appellant Corporation would companytinue to provide transport facilities on the route in question until the disposal of the renewal applications of the revision petitioners.
The facts of the three appeals are quite simple and are number in companytroversy.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHINGHAL, J. These appeals by special leave are directed against a companymon judgment of the Madras High Court dated August 22, 1977, in three revision petitions against the orders of the State Transport Corporation, Madras, dated February 16, 1977, by which the High Court allowed the revision petitions and remitted the cases to the Regional Transport Authority for fresh companysideration in the light of its observations.
There is numbercontroversy about them, and they are sufficient for the disposal of the present appeals by special leave.
They have been heard together at the instance of the learned Counsel for the parties and will be disposed of by this companymon judgment.
The companytroversy relates to the plying of vehicles on the Salem Krishnagiri route.
Its permit was due to expire on October 9, 1974, and it applied for its renewal within the time prescribed by law.
559 561/77.
