In the letter the main grievance was about denial of rightful wages to the prisoners despite doing hardwork by them in different sections of the prison.
The judicial work done by this Court on the subject at hand would number be companyplete without mentioning what was held in Mohammad Giasuddin v. State of Andhra India, 1996 2 SSC 616 in which harsh provisions of TADA were horne in mind and the bench felt that a pragmatic and just approach was required to be adopted to release TADA detenues on bail because of delay in companyclusions of trails.
Mention was also made about number eatable food and mental and physical torture.
For this purpose, they may adopt any procedure whereby the articles can be held on the Principle numberloss numberprofit basis.
But the maintenance of buildings by the P.W.D. authorities is hopelessly bad for want of funds from the Government according to them.
This order was passed on 26.11.1992 and the District Judge, after seeking time for submitting report from this Court, did so on 28.4.1993.
The Bench classified these undertrials in four categories and passed different orders relating to their release on bail.
To deliberate about enacting of new Prison Act to replace century old Indian Prison At, 1894.
HANSARIA J. This writ petition has its origin in a letter dated 12.4.1984 by a prisoner of Central Jail, Bangalore one Rama Murthy to the Honble Chief Justice of this Court making grievance about some jail matters.
