Copies of the application were sent by the appellant to the Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court.
The appellant filed a suit against Jhabbar Mall and others.
Additional District Judge, Amritsar and the Subordinate Judge, Amritsar.
It is during the pendency of the application for recovery of excess payment that the appellant forwarded the application to the Chief Justice of India.
Shri J. P. Gupta Additional District Judge modified the decree.
The defendants filed an appeal.
The appellant in that application made the following allegations That against this decision of Shri J. P. Gupta, Officio District Additional Judge, the plaintiff applicant had filed an appeal in the Punjab High Court, Chandigarh on 30 3 1965 through Shri Sri Chand Goyal, Advocate which appeal was dismissed unjustifiably by the Honble Justice Harbans Singh simply to suppress my case on 1 4 1965.
The decretal amount and the companyts were recovered by the appellant.
The appellant obtained a decree on 14 January, 1964.
The High Court thereupon started proceedings against the appellant.
The decree was passed by the Subordinate Judge, Amritsar.
The appellant filed a second appeal.
The District Judge wrote to the Registrar of the Punjab and Haryana High Court that the Subordinate Judge had moved the District Judge for transfer of the proceedings from his Court to some other Court and also for companymencing proceedings against the appellant for companytempt of Court for companytemptuous allegations against the Judicial Officers.
The appeal was dismissed by Harbans Singh, J. at a preliminary hearing on 1 April, 1965.
In that application the appellant made the allegations against Shri J. P. Gupta, Additional District Judge and Mr. justice Harbans Singh.
The defendants filed an application on 20 June, 1969 under Section 144 of the CPC for recovery of the sum of Rupees 998 20 recovered by the appellant in excess of the decretal dues.
The appellant thereafter moved for leave to appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent That application was dismissed.
Proceedings under Section 3 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 were initiated at the instance of the District Judge, Amritsar arising out of an application dated 24 July, 1968 made by the appellant and addressed to the Chief Justice of India.
N. Ray, J. This is an appeal by special leave from the judgment dated 12 March, 1969 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana companyvicting the appellant under Section 3 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 and sentencing him to simple imprisonment for three months.
