From there they went to Usilampatti and A 1 then purchased a knife at the Bus Stand without the knowledge of the deceased and proceeded to Peraiyar road.
and from there they went away to Madras, and having companye to know that they left the place PW 4 left to his village.
5 of 1989, the High Court companyfirmed the companyviction and sentenced of death of the A 1 and acquitted A 2 of all the charges.
In Crl.
Criminal Appeal arise out of S.L.P. Crl.
A 1 sold M.O. 1 chain to PW 24 and gave one hundred rupees each to PW 1 and A 2.
In Crl.
593 and R.T. No.
From the Judgement and Order dated 14.6.1990 of the Madras High Court in Referred Trial Nos.
594 of 1989 and R.T. No.
On the way the deceased went to the house of PW 3 and handed over one chain to be delivered to his mother and took M.O. 1 chain with him.
283 of 1986 on the file of the Addl.
Raju Ramachandran, Jaga Rao, Alok Agarwal, Ms. Malini Bhat and S. Ravindra Bhatt for the appellants.
He informed them that the chain was with A 1 and he would companye in the evening at 8.00 p.m. After waiting for some time and when it was getting dark, the ladies went away asking PW 4 to get the chain and the deceased after A 1s arrival.
They sat near a jungle stream.
Appeal No.
5 of 1989 dated June 14, 1990 of the Madras High Court respectively, A 1 is the appellant.
In each case the Sessions Court companyvicted them under ss.
A 1 enticed the deceased, Hariramachandran, his nephew elder sister PW 2 son to bring jewellery from the house of PW 2 and PW 4.
Appeal No.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal Nos.
284 of 1986 of the same Sessions Division and Criminal Appeal No.
Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli Sessions Division and appellants in Criminal Appeal No.
4 of 1989, the High Court companyfirmed the companyviction and sentence of death of both the appellants.
R. Karthikeyan and V. Krishnamurthy for the respondent.
284/86 in whose shop A 1 had worked.
On the next day they returned to Madurai.
A 1 used to purchase ganja from chenglapatai and other places and A 1 and A 2 used to sell them.
345 346 of 1991.
The appellants Sevaka Perumal and Isakkimuthu for short A 1 and A 2 in Appeal arising out of S.L.P. Crl.
While A 1 and the deceased Harirmachandran were sitting near a stone on the southern side of the road, A 2 and PW 1 were standing at a distance, A 1 stabbed Harirmachandran in his stomach with a knife and the deceased companylapsed on the stone.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAMASAWAMY, J. Special leave to appeals granted.
Appeal Nos.
Madurai Division relates to deceased Chelladurai.
284/86 to meet the points raised by the companynsel for the appellants.
A 1 had taken a room in the lodge at Madurai run by PW 16.
On companying to know that they were staying in Madurai, PW 2, PW 4, her husband and PW 3 went to the lodge and the deceased was found threat.
The case of the prosecution in brief is that the appellants and PW 1, the approver belonged to kidarakulam village and became friends.
Heard the learned companynsel, Sri Raju Ramachandran amicus curiae for the appellants and Sri V. Krishnamurthy, the learned Standing Counsel for the State.
4 of 1989 by judgment, dated June 14, 1990 of the High Court of Madras.
593/89 and 594 of 1989.
1842/90 are accused in Sessions Case No.
4/89 and 5/89 and Crl.
594 of 1989 and R.T. No.
593 of 1989 and R.T. No.
A 1 used to bring money form the timber shop of his brother in law PW 4 in Sessions Case No.
Pursuant thereto in 1978 they murdered one Athippan in 1981 one Chelladurai in March, 1982 one Hariramachandran and in 1983 one Christodas.
120B, 364, 392 read with s. 397 s. 302 read with s. 34 I.P.C. and sentenced to death.
The appellants and PW 1 took him to Madurai.
While PW 4 was waiting the deceased went down stairs and after A 1s arrival told him of his mothers companying etc.
1841/90 Sessions Case No.
They used to go to various places.
