This Court also gave one opportunity by order dated 14 3 1988 permitting the Insurance Company to file additional documents within four weeks.
After all this, for the first time before the Division Bench when the appeal against interim order was taken up for hearing, the appellant seems to have attempted to file the insurance policy to sustain its plea that the liability was limited.
Before the learned Single Judge, numberattempt was made by the Insurance Company to mark exhibit the insurance policy.
The claimants and the insured preferred appeals against the Tribunals order in the Punjab Haryana High Court.
Thereafter the learned Single Judge had enhanced the companypensation on the appeal filed by the claimants and directed the Insurance Company to pay the entire amount of the companypensation.
That application was dismissed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court and against that order, LP appeal was filed to the Division Bench.
On the other hand, it appears that the appellant filed an application seeking permission of the Court to take over all the defence of the insured.
Against that the Insurance Company preferred appeals to the Division Bench, which were also dismissed.
However, that was number allowed by the High Court.
The LPA was dismissed.
One of the challenges was regarding the extent of liability of the Insurance Company, whether it is limited or unlimited.
