Being aggrieved, the appellants predecessor ininterest then filed a civil suit, being Original Suit No.
The genesis of this dispute lies in the year 1987, when the appellants predecessorininterest filed an application under Section 63 a of the Act before the Deputy Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Administration Department, Madras for a declaration to the effect that the Bakers Choultry is a private property belonging to him, with a duty cast on him to perform certain private charities.
4510 of 1994, under Section 70 2 of the Act, challenging the orders of the Deputy Commissioner and the Commissioner.
The appellants thereafter filed the present Civil Appeal by way of Special Leave.
This application was dismissed vide order dated 19.03.1990, and the appeal against the above order, before the Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Administration Department, Madras, also came to be dismissed vide order dated 02.03.1994.
An appeal being Appeal Suit No.
However, this civil suit also came to be dismissed vide judgment dated 30.03.1999.
Signature Not Verified The short issue before us relates to the nature of the institution Digitally signed by VISHAL ANAND Date 2019.09.03 called Bakers Choultry, situated at No.
Heard the learned companynsels for the parties at length.
128 of 2000 was thereafter filed before the High Court of Judicature at Madras, wherein due to the demise of the appellants predecessorininterest the present appellants were brought on record as his legal representatives.
The High Court dismissed the appeal vide impugned judgment dated 27.11.2008.
V. RAMANA, J. This appeal is directed against judgment dated 27.11.2008, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Appeal Suit No.
128 of 2000, whereby the appeal filed by the appellants under Section 70 2 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 hereinafter the Act was dismissed.
