Therefore, a case was registered against A1 firm as well as A2 partner alongwith driver and cleaner besides charging A5, A6 A7 who are the retail sellers of kerosene to whom A1 claimed to have sold the kerosene.
6124 dated 01 07 1984, which has been marked as Ex.
P3 written in his own hand writing, but did number sign and escaped with A4 cleaner.
The State of Pondicherry filed an appeal before the High Court questioning the judgment of acquittal recorded by the trial companyrt.
P2 Series, the authorities entertained suspicion because the dispatch was on 14.7.1984 and when they checked the vehicle they found it empty.
By the impugned order the High Court set aside the acquittal so far as the present appellants are companycerned while dismissing the same qua the other five companyaccused persons.
Therefore, the driver was questioned, who gave statement Ex.
The trial Court on companysideration of the evidence came to hold that the accusations have number been established.
