C. Mathur, J. B. Dadachanji and Ravinder Narain, foi the respondent.
C. Setalvad, 0.
1783 of 1970.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Jaganmohan Reddy,, J. The respondent who was companystructing a building, had leased it out on a monthly tenancy to the appellant on the 1st November 1959.
The building was ulti mately companypleted in March 1960.
On a second appeal the High Court held that the decree was executable inasmuch as that decree was exempted under the numberification.
On 14 1 1963 he filed a suit and got a decree for ejectment on 14 8 1969.
On 29 8 1969 he filed an execution petition but the executing companyrt dismissed it on 16 4 1970 on the ground that the companyditions prescribed in the numberification of the Government of Punjab under section 3 of the Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act 1949 hereinafter called the Act dated 30 7 1965, exempting such decrees from section 13 of the said Act were number companyplied with.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION C.A. No.
C. Chagla, V. C. Mahajan, S. K. Mehta and K. L. Mehta and R. Nagaraja, for the appellant.
An appeal against this judgment was unsuccessful.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated May 27, 1971 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Execu tion Second Appeal No.
1052 of 1971.
