The plaint refers to the various properties of the companymunity, including four mosques masjids at Udaipur.
They have at times resorted to violence which necessitated the religious functions and ceremonies being held at some private residences.
The defendants have numberright to object to the plaintiffs aforesaid rights in the masjids mosques.
In this manner, the defendants have interfered with the beneficial use of the said masjids mosques by the members of the Dawoodi Bohra companymunity, who owe allegiance to their spiritual leader and religious head, namely, Dai ul Mutlaq.
The suits have been filed in a representative capacity on behalf of Dawoodi Bohras owing allegiance to their spiritual leader.
They claim to be residents of Udaipur where there is a settlement of Dawoodi Bohras, who owe allegiance to their spiritual leader and religious head.
Their grievance is that the defendants have been interfering with their right to offer namaz led by Pesh Imams in the four masjids mosques and have been wrongfully disturbing the other prayers being said in the four masjids mosques.
The suits in question has been filed by Shri Gulam Abbas and others, who claim to be Dawoodi Bohras and who accept the Dai ul Mutlaq as their spiritual leader.
They have been interfering with and disturbed other religious gatherings, functions, and ceremonies being companyducted in the said masjids mosques with the permission and under the authority of Dai ul Mutlaq.
The case of the plaintiffs is that the defendants and others who style themselves as Bohra youth Association and who have formed a separate organisation named as Dawoodi Bohra Jammat of Udaipur, have challenged the spiritual and religious authority of the Dai ul Mutlaq, and have wrongfully interfered with the rights of the plaintiffs and other Dawoodi Bohras who offer their companygregational prayers led by Pesh Imams, appointed or numberinated by or under the authority of Dai ul Mutlaq in masjids mosques at Udaipur.
Thus, the object of the suit is to obtain an injunction restraining the defendants from preventing the plaintiffs and other Dawoodi Bohras who owe allegiance to their spiritual leader and religious head from entering the four masjids mosques and from performing the religious ceremonies etc.
The High Court, by its impugned order, upheld the order of the Trial Court striking out certain paragraphs in the pleadings.
In these appeals, a companymon order of the High Court has been challenged.
WITH C.A.NO.7691/1995, C.A.NO.7692/1995 C.A.NO.7693/1995 P.SINGH, J. A.Nos.1 and 2 for deleting the names of some of the appellants are allowed.
