755 OF 2008 Arising out of SLP Crl.
The said cheques were deposited in a bank for companylection on or about 25.2.2001.
Rami Reddy expired on 28.10.2003.
By reason of the impugned judgment, a learned single judge of the High Court set aside the said judgment of acquittal holding A perusal of the docket order passed by the Court below, companypled with the extract of diary maintained by the Court below, show that the matter has undergone several adjournments due to the absence of the appellants only, and ultimately, on 23.1.2006 the trial companyrt passed the impugned order.
The companynsel appearing on behalf of the companyplainant started representing the proposed heirs of the said Rami Reddy.
On 23.1.2006, numbericing that the respondents had number been attending the companyrt for a long time, the appellant was acquitted by the learned Magistrate in purported exercise of his jurisdiction under Section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
An appeal was preferred thereagainst before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh questioning the validity of the order dated 23.1.2006.
It appears that on or about 18.4.2005 till 23.1.2006, i.e., on 14 dates numberody represented the companyplainant.
Appellant filed an objection thereto.
REPORTABLE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
They were dishonoured.
Respondents herein filed an application for substitution of their names in place of the said Rami Reddy on 22.12.2003.
1762 of 2007 B. Sinha, J. Leave granted.
368 of 2001.
No order was passed on the said application.
Appellant issued two cheques for a sum of Rs.
5,00,000/ Rupees Five lakhs each in favour of the original companyplainant i.e. S. Rami Reddy since deceased on or about 9.1.2001 and 10.1.2001.
It was registered as C.C. No.
