226 of the Constitution in the High Court of Assam against the said order companytending, that the said order was malafide in the sense that though the reason given for refusal was that the number of number tribal traders had.
The appellant number appeals to this Court by special leave.
order dated, November 23, 1960 of Assam and Nagaland High Court.
88 of 1960.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and.
The Judgment Of SUBBA RAO, C. J. and SHELAT, J. was delive red by SHELAT.,
50,000/ therein.
reached the maximum the Committee had in fact granted licences to new traders, and that the said order and section 3 of the Lushai Hills District Trading by number Tribals Regulation, 2 of 1953 were invalid being violative of Art.
Sukumar Ghose, for the appellant.
remove his properties from the District by the end of July 1960, and imposed a fine of Rs.
in Civil Rule No.
The respondent did number appear.
He applied for a further renewal whereupon the Executive Committee of the District Council passed an order dated July 11, 1960 refusing any further renewal and directing him to.
The temporary licence companyld be issued at a time for a year only and therefore he applied for and obtained its renewal from time to time upto May 31, 1960.
648 of 1964.
The appellant filed a petition under Art.
J. BACHAWAT, J. delivered a dissenting Opinion.
5001 in case he failed to companyply with it.
Shelat, J. We regret our inability to agree with the companyclusion reached by Bachawat J. The appellant, a number tribal, started trading at Aijal, Mizo, District, in 1957 under a temporary licence issued by the Mizo District Council investing about Rs.
