1984.,
The employer companytested the claim both in regard to gratuity as also interest.
1 in April 1944 and was relieved from service on his resignation with,effect from 24.5.2983.
From the Judgment and Order dated 14.6.1985 of the Appellate Authority Delhi in Appeal No.
1 challenged the order before he appellate Authority.
The appellate Authority affirmed the determination of gratuity but set aside the order for payment of interest.
1983, the appellant furnished an application in Form l for payment of gratuity but numberaction was taken by the employer then appellant approached the statutory companytrolling authority for determination of the amount of gratuity and requested that on the sum due interest may be paid.
the companytrolling authority determined the amount of gratuity at Rs.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RANGANATH MISRA, J. The short question in this appeal by special leave is whether the appellant workman was entitled to interest on the gratuity due to him under the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 39 of 1972 .
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
Thereupon PG NO 744 Respondent No.,
2 of 1985.
Appellant joined service under Respondent No.
Anil Kumar Gupta and B.N. Singhvi for the Appellant.
2659 of 1986.
16,380 and directed the Respondent No.
1 to pay along with companypound interest of 9 per cent.
Raja Ram Agarwal, Parveen Kumar and Vivek Gambhir for the Respondents.
