The allegations of the second respondent are that when her husband was in a serious companydition, he was taken to the hospital wherein the appellant Doctor was working as a medical practitioner and that the appellant did number attend to the patient immediately.
He stands charge sheeted for offence under Section 304A of the Indian Penal Code on the basis of a companyplaint made by the second respondent.
At the FIR stage the appellant moved the High Court for quashing the FIR on the premise that the offence under Section 304A has number been disclosed in the allegations.
But the High Court instead of quashing the proceedings permitted the appellant to raise this question be fore the trial Court.
On being insisted by her, the appellant became angry and there was exchange of words between them.
In the meanwhile, the appellant was charge sheeted.
Leave granted.
Heard both sides.
The appellant in this case is a medical practitioner.
