Respondents A1 and A2 were working as Inspector of Police and Subinspector of Police respectively in the State Tamil Nadu Police Services.
P.C. Crl.
R.C. Nos.825 and 826 of 2015 whereby the High Court dismissed the revisions filed by the appellantState and affirmed the order of the Special Judge Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvannamalai by which the respondents herein were discharged under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 hereinafter referred to as the Crl.
P.C. and remand the case to the Special Judge CJM for its trial on merits in accordance with law.
The State felt aggrieved by the order dated 29.06.2015 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate and filed two revisions in the High Court.
M.P.Nos.648/2014 113/2015 before the CJM praying therein for their discharge from the case.
4 of 2014 in the Court of Special Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvannamalai.
On chargesheet being filed by the State Prosecuting Agency against the respondents after obtaining necessary sanction as required in law, both of them filed applications under Section 227 of the Cr.
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Leave granted.
Having heard the learned companynsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case including the written submissions filed by the respondents, we are inclined to allow the appeals and while setting aside the impugned order, dismiss the applications filed by the respondents under Section 227 of the Cr.
Signature Not Verified These appeals are directed against the final Digitally signed by ASHOK RAJ SINGH Date 2019.03.07 172909 IST judgment and order dated 14.07.2016 passed by Reason the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Crl.
P.C. Heard Mr. S. Partha Sarathi, learned companynsel for the appellant and Mr. Neeraj Jain, learned Senior companynsel and Mr. S. Thananjayan, learned companynsel for the respondents.
By impugned order, the High Court dismissed the revisions and affirmed the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, giving rise to filing of these appeals by the State by way of special leave in this Court.
Both the respondents were prosecuted for companymission of the offences punishable under Section 7 read with Section 13 1 d of the PC Act in Crime Case No.3 of 2008/Special Case No.
P.C. from the Criminal Proceedings filed against them in Special Case No.4 of 2014 under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 hereinafter referred to as the PC Act .
