The promotions given on ad hoc basis cannot give any right to seniority.
Application No.986 of 1988 dismissed the application of the appellants to review its order made in T.A. No.263/86 on August 14, 1987.
The regular promotee cannot be deprived of seniority on the basis of the ad hoc promotions given to the D.Cs.
The Central Administrative Tribunal, Ahmedabad in its order dated September 29, 1989 in Misc.
To the said order, the appellants were number impleaded as parties.
who were promoted on transfer but were juniors in the cadre of L.D.Cs.
The facts in this case are that the appellants are D.Cs.
was being maintained for the entire Western Zone.
The appellants were working as L.D.Cs.
in Rajkot.
Leave granted.
Such ad hoc promotions do number deprive the seniority of the respondents 5 and 6 in this appeal.
in the Western Zone of the office of the Controller of Imports Exports companyprising Rajkot, Ahmedabad, Bhopal, Bombay Kandla.
Admittedly, they were appointed as LDCs in the year 1964 while the appellants were appointed in 1969.
It is their case that when they went to Ahmedabad and reported to duty, they came to know that the appellants had already been promoted as UDCs and were companytinuing as such on the above basis.
Common seniority list as L.D.Cs.
Therein, the Tribunal had directed the seniority list of D.C. to be drawn afresh in the light of the directions issued in that order, namely, numberpromotion should be made on the basis of options without resorting to the recruitment rules in terms of the quota laid down and the procedures for filling it up companyld be regarded as valid as long as it is number ad hoc.
