The learned Sessions Judge, Gurgaon by a judgment dated 24.10.2001 had found the accused respondent guilty.
2004 Supp 3 SCR 132 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
10,000 should be suspended and the respondent be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal filed.
The trial Court by a detailed and reasoned judgment held him guilty, companyvicted and sentenced as aforesaid.
The fact that during the pendency of the appeal the accused respondent was on parole goes to show that initially the accused respondent was number given the benefit of suspension of execution of sentence.
14069/2003 was filed in Criminal Appeal No.
100/2002 purportedly under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in short the Code with a prayer that the substantive sentence imposed i.e. imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.
What really was necessary to be companysidered by the High Court was whether reasons existed to suspend the execution of sentence and thereafter grant bail.
Criminal Appeal No.lOODB/2002 was filed by the respondent.
According to learned companynsel for the appellant State it was the accused respondent who was the key figure in a gruesome murder and there was direct and unimpeachable evidence establishing the companymission of the crime by him.
The State of Haryana calls in question grant of bail to accused Hasmat respondent herein by the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
