The learned Single Judge after hearing the parties vacated the ad interim relief.
The respondent before surrendering filed a writ petition in the High Court on 23rd October, 1996 and obtained ad interim stay of the proposed order which had remained unserved.
The writ appeal has number been still disposed of.
Thereafter, the respondent went in appeal before the Division Bench and again obtained ad interim relief on 10th January, 1997 which was extended from time to time.
These appeals have been moved Also against various extensions of interim relief orders passed by the Division Bench pending the appeal.
A detention order under Section 3 1 of the COFEPOSA Act was passed by the authorities on 13th September, 1996 against the respondent.
When the writ petition was filed, the respondent had number surrendered.
In our view, a very unusual order seems to have been passed in a pending appeal by the Division Bench of the High Court.
It is challenged by the Union of India in these appeals.
We have heard learned companynsel for the parties.
MAJMUDAR, J. Delay companydoned.
Leave granted.
