The appellant asked for grant of time for submitting his defence and be also demanded companyies of certain documents etc to prove his case.
Your services will be terminated on 25th June, 1951.
Appeal from the judgment and decree dated May 23, 1961 of e Punjab High Court, Circuit Bench at Delhi in Regular Second appeal No.
On May 26, 1951 while this inquiry was pending he was served with an order by the Ordnance Officer, Administration, Shakur basti, Delhi which was as follows Under instructions received from Army Head quarters you are hereby given one months numberice of discharge with immediate effect, services being numberlonger required.
17 19 or 67.
43 D of 1956.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The appellant appealed to the High Court which was dismissed.
According to the allegations in the plaint the appellant was appointed by the Governor General in July 1942 as Supervisor, Army Ordnance Corps which, according to him, was a civil post under the Crown in India.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Grover, L This is an appeal by certificate from a judgment and decree of the Punjab High Court Circuit Bench, Delhi by which the suit filed by the appellant for a declaration that the order dated May 26, 1951 directing his removal from service was wrongful, illegal and void and that he still companytinued to be in the service of the respondent as Supervisor, Army Ordnance Corps.
A. Seyid Muhammad and S. P. Nayar, for the respondent.
His appeal was heard along with certain other appeals in which similar points were involved.
N. Keswani, for the appellant.
H. S. Dhillon.
In the months of September and October, 1950 the appellant was served with chargesheets by the Ordnance Officer, Administration, Shakurbasti, Delhi State, where he was posted at that time calling upon him to submit his defence to the charges of making serious false allegations against his superior officer Maj.
