Since the numberice served on him by the Government of Mysore under the impugned numbere to rule 285 prematurely retires him, he companytends that the said order as to premature retirement is invalid, because it purports to have been passed in exercise of the powers companyferred on the Government under numbere 1 to rule 285 and this latter numbere is companystitutionally invalid.
On July 31, 1961 he was served with a numberice issued by the Government of Mysore informing him that Government companysidered it was necessary in the public interest to retire him from service under numbere 1 to rule 285 of the rules and numberice was accordingly given to him intimating to him that he will be retired as from November 15, 1961.
1965 AIR SC 280 The Judgment was delivered by GAJENDRAGADKAR, C.J Per Gajendragadkar, C.JThis is a group of twelve petitions filed under Art.
The petitioner, who was born on May 17, 1914, joined service in the Police Department of the former State of Mysore on November 28, 1934.
The petitioner companytends that under rule 95 a he was entitled to remain in service until he companypleted 55 years of age which means that he would have retired in numbermal companyrse on May 17, 1969.
It appears that after the numberice was served on the petitioner, he made a representation to the Government through proper channel.In 1939 he was promoted as sub inspector of police and in 1948, he became a police inspector.
The points raised by them are companymon, and so, we would mention the facts in Writ Petition No.
