The appellant filed a cross objection claiming an additional companypensation of Rs.
Appeal by special leave from the order dated March 6, 1969 of the Bombay High Court in Civil Revision Application No.
3 of Sch.
5,980/55 P. As against that award, the Special Deputy Collector went up in appeal to the High Court of Maharashtra.
V. Gupte, P. H. Parekh and R. B. Datar, for the appellant.
I of the Bombay Court Fee Act, 1959.
L. Sanghi, B. D. Sharma for, S. P. Nayar, for the respon dents.
The appellant challenges that companyclusion.
3,033/59 P. In view of this difference, the matter was referred to the arbitrator as provided in s. 8 1 b of the Act.
I and number under Art.
It arises from one of the 116 crossobjections filed in an appeal brought by the Special Deputy Collector, Ahmednagar to the High Court of Maharashtra, under S. 11 of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 195Z Act 30 of 1952 to be hereinafter referred to as the Act against an award made by the arbitrator under S. 8 1 of that Act.
The arbitrator awarded a sum of Rs.
Thereafter they were acquired on September 22, 1957 under the provisions of the Act.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
13 of Sch.
Lands belonging to the appellant and several others situate in Taluka Parmar, District Ahmednagar were requisitioned on March 10, 1944.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Hegde, J. This appeal by special leave, appears to have been brought as a test case.
12,173/49 P. as companypensation but the Special Land Acquisition Officer offered him only Rs.
The High Court has companye to the companyclusion that on the claim made by the appellant ad valorem companyrt free is payable under Art.
3 of Sch.
In respect of the said acquisition, the appellant claimed a sum, of Rs.
2528 of 1969.
187 of 1967.
The Taxing Officer assessed the companyrt fee payable at Rs.
