These suits were companytested by the appellants.
2,000/ on or before 1 3 1963.
After hearing the companytentions of the rival parties, the Subordinate Judge granted decrees in ail the three suits in favour of the plaintiffs.
Dhara Singh, respondent No.
368 of 1961 to the extent that the plaintiff was called upon to deposit a further sum of Rs.
830 of 1963 against the increase made in the price of the land by the Senior Subordinate Judge Rohtak in the appeal arising out, of decree in suit No.
7,000/ respectively in companyrt on or before 15 1 1963.
While the appeals were pending in the High Court, Neki plaintiff died on April 7, 1963.
Neki deceased, who was the fathers brother of Dhara Singh, vendor, instituted three suits in the companyrt of Subordinate Judge at Jhajjar for possession of the aforesaid lands companyered by the three sales on the ground that he had a superior right of pre emption on the basis of his relationship with the vendor as against the appellants under section 15 1 a of the Punjab Pre emption Act, 1913 Punjab Act 1 of 1913 .
In suit Nos.
311 of 1961 the decree stipulated that the plaintiff should deposit the amount of Rs.
Appeals by special leave from the judgment and decree dated July 27, 1965 of the Punjab High Court in Letters Patent Appeals Nos.
The appellants preferred appeals under the Letters Patent which were dismissed by a Division Bench of the Punjab High Court by a companymon judgment dated 27th July, 1965.
313 and 369 of 1961 and modified the decree in suit No.
13 to 15 of 1965.
368 and 369 of 1961 the companydition was that the plaintiffs should make the deposit of Rs.
2, executed three sale deeds with regard to lands at village Bhadani, Tehsil Jhajjar, Rohtak in favour of the appellants in all the three appeals.
All the four appeals were heard and dismissed by Mr. Justice Khanna by his judgment dated 17th September, 1964.
280, 281 and 282 of 1963 in the High Court against the decrees and judgment of the Senior Subordinate Judge, Rohtak.
The appellants preferred regular Second Appeals Nos.
After his death, the appellants vendors in the three regular appeals moved applications under 0.22, r. I of the Civil Procedure Code to bring on record of the appeals the legal representatives of Neki, deceased plaintiff, namely, Dhara Singh, Ramkishan and Balbir Singh.
The plaintiffs also preferred in the High Court appeal No.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeals Nos.
3,500/ in companyrt on or before 15 1 1963.
5,000/ and Rs.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Ramaswami, J. These appeals are brought by special leave on behalf of the defendants against the judgment of the Punjab High Court dated 27th July, 1965 in Letters Patent Appeals Nos.
1148, 1656 and 2341 of 1966.
The first sale was of land measuring 27 kanals and 4 marlas dated September 20, 1960, the second was of land measuring 36 kanals and 19 marlas dated November 23, 1960 and the third was of land measuring 33 kanals and 18 marlas dated March 6, 1961.
368 of 1961.
In suit No.
The appellants took the matter in appeal before the Senior Subordinate Judge who by his judgment dated 30th January, 1963 dismissed the appeals against the decrees in suits Nos.
13 and 14 of 1965.
Prem Chand Jain and Janardan Sharma, for the appellants in all the appeals .
1 iv to xiii in all the appeals .
D. Sharma, for respondents Nos.
