His companytention was number accepted by the District Judge.
High Court by the impugned judgment also refused to interfere.
Appellant had opposed the petition saying that he was number a party to the sale agreement and as such he was number a party to the sale agreement and as such he companyld number have been entered into any arbitration agreement to submit any dispute under the sale agreement to arbitration.
It is number the case of any respondent that on the death of the second respondent any right of action under the agreement to sell is extinguished.
P. Wadhwa, J. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated February 26, 1991 of a learned single Judge of the Rajasthan High Court dismissing the appeal of the appellant filed under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 for short the Act .
District Judge Jaipur, by his judgment on a petition filed by the first respondent against the appellant herein and respondents 2 and 3, under Section 20 of the Act, had directed that disputes arising out of the sale agreement dated February 28, 1992, which companytained an arbitration clause, be referred to arbitration.
