After the report of the C.E.C., the State Government passed an order stopping the mining operations on 25.11.20090.
The State of Andhra Pradesh has filed these appeals challenging the interim order passed by the High Court of Judicature of A.P. at Hyderabad in different Writ Petitions which were jointly heard by the High Court.
Learned companynsel appearing for the respondent submits that the respondent is prepared to delete all statements averments made in the Writ Petition pertaining to respondent Mr.Tapal Ganesh, who is the appellant herein.
This Court, while entertaining these appeals, granted stay of the impugned order on 17.12.2009.
The petitioner alleges that before the High Court a reference has been made to the petitioner in paragraphs in 16,17,18 and 21 in the Writ Petition filed by the respondent.
The petitioner herein filed an application for getting himself impleaded in a Writ Petition filed before the High Court and the same was rejected by the High Court.
SLP C NOS CC NOS.21329 21330 Permission to file SLPs granted.
CIVIL APPEAL NOS.269 270/2010 SLP C Nos.35169 35170/2009 Leave granted.
SLP C NOS CC NOS.21271 21272 Permission dismissed.
The Special Leave Petitions are disposed of accordingly.
This order was challenged by the respondents in these two appeals.
The respondents herein were granted three leases for mining and there were allegations that the lease licence holders had extended the mining activities beyond the boundaries of the leasehold properties and that the Central Empowered Committee for short C.E.C. has filed a Report on 19.11.2009 and in the Report it was stated that there were certain violations of boundaries of the lease hold area.
