It is this issue which was probed by the Revenue Authorities by holding an inquiry under the Regulation such as in the first instance, by the Special Deputy Collector by order dated 24.04.1984, thereafter by the Agent to Govt.
A few facts need mention hereinbelow for the disposal of the appeal, which involves a short point.
The appellants felt aggrieved by the order of the High Court and have filed the present appeal by way of special leave in this Court.
This dispute is governed by the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation, 1959 as amended by Regulation 1 of 1970 hereinafter referred to as the Regulation .
However, the State Special Deputy Collector Tribal welfare, Kota Ramachandra Puram, West Godavari , questioned the bona fides of the transactions in question and accordingly issued the numberices to the appellants alleging therein that since these sale deeds were found executed in companytravention of Section 3 1 a of the Regulation by the Vendors and the Vendees appellants and, therefore, they were null and void.
The claim of the appellants is that they have purchased the suit land vide registered sale deeds dated 29.01.1977 executed by several vendors.
as an Appellate Authority by order dated 27.10.2001 followed by the State as a Revisionary Authority by order dated 16.07.2007 and by the High Court in its writ jurisdiction by order dated 02.08.2007 and thereafter in its intra companyrt appellate jurisdiction by the impugned order.
The dispute relates to the land measuring around 60 acres companyprised in survey Nos.462 and 472 situated at Ganaparavaram village of Buttaigudem Mandal, West Godavari District hereinafter referred to as the suit land .
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 24.08.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Writ Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ASHOK RAJ SINGH Date 2019.05.03 164511 IST Reason Appeal No.675 of 2007 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the said writ appeal filed by the appellants herein.
