The defendants denied the plaintiffs title to Badi Takia.
3 and 4 brought a Tazia from their house and kept the same in a portion of Badi Takia the place where they kept the Tazia is shown in the plan produced into Court .
Despite the plaintiffs protest the defendants did number remove the Tazia Hence the plaintiffs were companystrained to bring the suit claiming damages.
Their case was that Badi Takia was a wakf property the plaintiffs were in possession of the same in their capacity as Mutawallis.
Hence the .
The suit from which this appeal arises is one for damages.
On 27 2 1959 defendants Nos.
The plaintiffs case is that they are the owners of a plot named Badi Takia.
defendants had a right to place the Tazia Two questions arose for decision before the trial Courts.
S. Hegde, J This is a defendants appeal by special leave.
