A. No.1612/2018 S.L.P. C No.11404 of 2013 Page 2 of 6 Secondly, in the case of a Hindi Language Assistant, the candidate must be a holder of a Bachelors Degree with Hindi as a major subject and must be the holder of a B.Ed Degree with the companycerned subject as teaching methods.
931 of 2004 before the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal challenging his number selection.
A recruitment numberification was issued by the appellants on 30th July, Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by SANJAY KUMAR 2003 for the appointment of High School Assistant Teacher Grade 2.
Feeling aggrieved by the decision of the Tribunal, the appellants preferred a writ petition in the Karnataka High Court and the last selected candidate Prakash Kundalik Patil also preferred a writ petition in the High Court.
Feeling aggrieved, Respondent No.1 preferred Application No.
By its judgment and order dated 4th December, 2009 the Tribunal came to the companyclusion that under the Recruitment Rules, namely, The Karnataka Education Department Services Department of Public Instructions Recruitment Amendment Rules, 2002 there are three sets of qualifications postulated for appointment to the post of Language Assistant.
Madan B. Lokur, J. Leave granted.
Broadly, a Language Assistant must have a Bachelors Degree in Arts with the companycerned language as one of the optional subjects and must be the holder of a degree in Education.
The appellants are aggrieved by a judgment and order dated 9th September, 2011 passed by the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court in Writ Petition No.63822/2010 and Writ Petition No.65517/2010.
The companytroversy in this appeal is narrow and companycerns the number selection of Respondent No.1 Shankar Baburao Kangralkar to the post of Hindi Language Assistant in a Government High School in Karnataka.
The High Court took the view that as long as Respondent No.1 holds a Bachelors Degree with Hindi as a major subject and a B.Ed Degree from Karnataka University, he was entitled to be companysidered for selection to the post of Language Assistant.
Both the writ petitions were heard and dismissed by the High Court with the result that Respondent No.1 was required to be companysidered for the post of Language Assistant.
