march 17.
it is number disputed that a companyrt companyld number have taken cognizance of this offence against the appellant if he had been a magistrate on june 9 1954.
appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated august 4 1958 of the former high companyrt at bombay in criminal revision application number 728 of 1958.
p. maheshwari for the appellant.
the appellant was dismissed from service on april 4 1953 as a result of a departmental enquiry.
the appellant was number a magistrate on june 9 1954 when the companyplaint was filed.
criminal appellate jurisdiction criminal appeal number 127 of 1960.
the companyviction was companyfirmed by the extra additional sessions judge ahmedabad.
he was companyvicted of the offence under s. 409 indian penal companye by the trial magistrate.
on june 9 1954 a complaint was filed on behalf of the state against the appellant.
200 in cash from amar singh madhav singh as deposit for security to be released on bail.
this amount was number credited in the criminal deposit rojmal and the appellant thereby companymitted criminal breach of trust with respect to the amount.
vir sen sawhney r. h. dhebar and t. m. sen for the respondent.
the appellant was a third class magistrate at sanand in 1951.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by raghubar dayal j. this appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the bombay high companyrt.
he received rs.
