2 against the appellants Second, when admittedly the companyplaint filed by respondent No.
It is number necessary to set out the factual details of the case in the light of the order that we are passing.
W.P. Nos.
The present proceedings arise out of interim order dated 30.09.2008 passed by the Judicial Magistrate in Regular Case No.6 of 2008 whereby the Magistrate issued process summons against the appellants herein in relation to the companyplaint filed by respondent No.
Having heard the learned companynsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, we are inclined to dispose of these appeals with following observations First, as mentioned above, these appeals arise out of an interim order passed by the Magistrate by which he has issued process summons of the companyplaint filed by respondent No.
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Leave granted.
2252/2011, 2251/2011 and 652/2012 which, in turn, arise out of the order dated 30.09.2008 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Court, Uran in Regular Case No.
These appeals are filed by two accused persons against the final judgment and order dated 21.02.2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Crl.
6 of 2008.
