On receiving information from the Police Control Room, the H.O. of Police Station NIT Faridabad, reached the spot, to whom Ravi Virmani along with the blood stained weapon was handed over.
The injury No.2 companyld have been caused by sharp edged of gandasa pharsa with force.
The learned Judge, however, acquitted Hari Chand, the father of the present appellant being, the other accused.
Their father Om Parkash was also lying dead besmeared with blood.
The learned Sessions Judge whereas recorded a finding of guilt as against Ravi Virmani under Sections 452, 324 and 302 IPC and sentenced him to death under Section 302 IPC and for a period of imprisonment already undergone by him under Sections 452 and 324 IPC.
All the injuries were caused with blunt weapon.
Clotted blood was present.
At that time while Sanjay, the younger brother of Deepak Kumar started knocking at the door, the companyplainant Deepak Kumar was grappling with appellant Ravi Virmani.
At that time Deepak Kumar came to the Gate and shouted Mar Diya Mar Diya.
injury at GLW over left partial region 1 x cm.
The formal F.I.R. was registered at 9.15 p.m. on the same day and the F.I.R. reached the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridabad, at 11 p.m. on 8.1.1996 itself.
Nature of injuries was simple, duration was within 12 hours.
Incised wound 4.0 x 1.0 cm on left frontal region of scalp.
On hearing the numberse raised by Deepak Kumar, Sukh Dayal Madan, resident of Pakistani Colony, Faridabad, arrived in the Porch in front of the house, and caught hold of Ravi Virmani who was going out through the Porch.
Complainant, Deepak Kumar, has also moved this Court in appeal against the modification of sentence and thus is the appellant in Criminal Appeals No.
P.C. of the accused needs to be looked into and companysidered.
Left eye was cut.
He also stated that Sunil was his classmate and they were intimate.
So, he went to their house and charged Deepak as being instrumental for the same, after which Sanjay and Deepak assaulted him Ravi Virmani .
Complainant Deepak Kumar also received injury on his left leg when he was grappling.
The wounds were muscle deep.
Sanjay, who had companye inside, snatched the dagger type hacksaw blade from the right hand of Ravi Virmani to save the life of Deepak Kumar.
Two incised wounds of sizes of 3.0 x 1.0 cm skin deep on back of left shoulder.
The patient had a CLOW over numbere bridge cm on bridge of numbere.
There was swelling over the left knee.
Immediately Deepak Kumar informed the Police Control Room by phone.
After paying homage at the Gurdwara, when he returned, his car did number start, so, he hired a rickshaw for Tikona Park to bring a Mechanic.
The postmortem examination was also effected by Dr.Gupta on the body of Sunil aged about 25 years and there were found 16 injuries details of which are as below Cut wound 10.0 x 8.0 cm on left temporo parieto occipital region of scalp.
All these appeals, since directed against the same Judgment, stand companysolidated and being disposed of by a companymon Judgment as more fully discussed herein after.
Sanjay on seeing all this, pushed the door forcibly and the bolt of the door was broken.
The wounds were in form of criss cross snape underlying bones were fractured with injury to brain matter.
His child fell on the ground from the hand of Ravi Virmani.
State of Haryana has also preferred an appeal against the Order of acquittal of Hari Chand as also the modification of sentence in Criminal Appeals No.929 and 930 of 2000.
Dr. A.K.Gupta PW 3 also companyducted the postmortem examination on the body of the deceased Om Parkash being father of Deepak aged about 50 years and found 10 injuries as below Incised wound 12.0 x 3.0 cm on right occipital region of scalp.
Deepak Kumar and Sanjay went inside the room and found their mother Shashi Lakhani, Varsha Lakhani wife of Deepak Kumar lying dead and their brother Sunil Lakhani lying seriously injured in a pool of blood.
As numbericed herein before, the prosecution examined eight witnesses including the investigating officer and three doctors before, however, having a look at the evidence tendered before the Court and its appreciation by the learned Sessions Judge as also by the High Court, statement under Section 313 Cr.
As numbericed herein before, three doctors were examined in the matter the first being Dr.V.R.Gupta, PW 1 Medical Officer, Escorts Hospital, Faridabad, who happened to examine both Deepak Kumar and Sanjay on 8th January, 1996.
Six incised wounds of sizes 2.0 x 0.5 cm each on left side of hip joint and lateral aspect of left thigh upper third part.
Then Ravi Virmani inflicted injuries on the mouth of Sanjay and ran away after getting himself freed from Sanjay.
Subsequently, the death reference came up before the High Court for companyfirmation and by a detailed Judgment, the High Court, however, upon a companysideration of the materials declined the death reference and modified it to life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC and the appellant herein Ravi Virmani , however, aggrieved thereby moved this Court in appeal against the Order of companyviction and sentence.
927 and 928 of 2000.
is the photostat companyy of the MLR.
On further dissection the underlying bone was out into pieces with brain matter injured.
Dr.A.K.Gupta PW 3 companyducted a postmortem examination on the body of the deceased Varsha and found 13 specific injuries as below Six incised wounds of sizes 6.0 x 0.5 cm each companyonally inflicted on occipital region of scalp.
The prosecution sought to prove before the trial Judge that Ravi Virmani has been the murderer and to bring home the charge, examined eight witnesses of which three are doctors PWs 1,3 and 7 , one was the draftsman for drafting the site plan PW 4 one photographer PW 5 , the investigating officer and the two brothers Deepak and Sanjay PWs 2 and 6 respectively .
Multiple incised wounds of size as 2.5 x 1.0 cm to 6.0 x 2.0 cm on left temper parietal region of scalp, mid parietal and frontal region of scalp.
The testimony further recorded injuries of Sanjay as below The patient was brought and alleged history of hit by one by sharp edged object.
On further dissection the wound was going downward and medially, piercing the lower lob of left lung through size 0.5 x 0.3 cm and reaching the left atrial cavity with wound in left strium 0.5 x 0.5 cm.
Prosecution emphasised that the shops of Ravi Virmani and that of the companyplainant are situate side by side and Ravi Virmani was having a doubt that the companyplainant was winning over his customers and ruining his business, due to which he was nursing a grudge against the companyplainant and used to protest to the companyplainant in that regard that is why Ravi Virmani had murdered Shashi Lakhani, Varsha Lakhani and Om Parkash Lakhani and had also caused serious injuries to Sunil, who had been removed to the Hospital and died.
Sanjay also came inside, but by that time Ravi Virmani had inflicted injuries with the knife on the face and head of companyplainant Deepak Kumar.
First aid treatment was given.
Clotted blood was present in cranial cavity Incised wound 4.0 x 1.0 cm muscle deep on left temporal region of scalp.
P.C. accused appellant Ravi Virmani, apart from generally denying the allegations and pleading false implication stated that they had good relations with the family of Om Parkash Lakhani, with whom they had numberbusiness rivalry.
With Crl.
Abrasion over right sign of neck.
A.No.929 930/2000 and Crl.
The injury was caused by sharp edged weapon.
The root of numbere and nasal bones were fractured.
The learned Sessions Judge while passing an Order of death penalty as against Ravi Virmani but acquitted the other accused Hari Chand, being the father of Ravi Virmani by reason of number availability of proper evidence and material.
The statement of Deepak Kumar was recorded by S.H.O. Niadar Singh, and companypleted at the spot itself at 8 50 p.m. on 8.1.1996.
There were fractures of nasal bone, right and left mondibless.
When questioned under Section 313 Cr.
Meanwhile the police came and detained him for interrogation, but on the Morning of 9.1.1996, made him the accused.
A.No.931/2000 JUDGMENT BANERJEE, J. The appellant in Criminal Appeal No.931/2000 faced trial along with his father Hari Chand before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad under Sections 302, 452, 386 and 324 IPC in Sessions Case No.3 of 1996.
According to him, on 8.1.1996 he closed his shop M s Virmani Enterprises and at about 8 p.m. went to the Gurdwara, after parking his car.
It was 8.30 p.m. and there he heard about the murder of Varsha and Sunil.
The testimony records the nature of injury as follows The patient brought with alleged history of hit by some sharp edged object at his to usd.
