The appellant Brij Mohan used to prepare false, out door patient tickets in the names of government servant giving back dates and then arranged to get the bogus cash memos in respect of those tickets which were prepared by Govind Lal the shop owner, with the help of Chandra who was also working in the shop.
The case pertains to a certain illegal set alleged to have been companymitted by Brij Mohan and other companyaccused, including Narain Lal Nrala while discharging their duties as pubic servants, having been employed and posted as Vaid and Up vaid in Ayurvedic Aushadhalaya, jaipur.
The Additional Superintend of Police in Anti Corruption Department received information and that companyruption was rampant in the said Aushadalaya and that Brij Mohan the appellant Up vaid was in the habit of making bogus medical bills for govt.
Narain Lal Nirala the Vaid, used to verify such cash memos and used to issue the essentiality certificate to enable the government servants companycerned viz.,
A panchnama was drawn and the necessary charge sheet was laid.
servants for payment of 30 amount of the bills which was proved to be a serious Illegal gratification.
Superintendent of Police who received information regarding the illegal activities decided to lay a trap and accordingly passed an order and arranged a trap with the help of Jagdish Singh P.W. 1 .
The further ease of the prosecution is that Narain Lal Nirala another accused who was working as Vaid in the said department was companyspired to companymit illegal acts for the purpose of illegal gratification.
All the accused denied the offence.
the so called patients to realise payments of the amount of bogus cash memos from the government.
Both these appeals arise out of the judgment of the High Court of Rajasthan companyfirming the companyviction and sentence passed against the appellants by the Special Judge for ACD cases.
The Panchnama was drafted and tainted money was handed over to him after numbering the numbers of the currency numberes.
One Gobind Lal the proprietor of Ayurvedic Stores, along with his assistants was also parties to the criminal companyspiracy.
The amount of illegal gratification realised were to be divided amongst themselves.
118/1985 is filed by one Brij Mohan.
Criminal Appeal No.
The Addl.
546/1984 is thus disposed of accordingly.
This according to the prosecution, was the modus operandi of the whole case.
He went to the hospital putting up the appearance as a patient and approached Brij Mohan and the transaction was settled.
