The present respondents questioned companyrectness of the order by filing special appeal before the High Court.
While allowing the writ petition the learned Single Judge gave directions which essentially read as follow The respondents are directed to prepare a list of the employees who were appointed prior to 1.10.1986 in the production cum training Centre of IERT, and were working companytinuously till the date of their retrenchment i.e. 31.3.1999 by excluding those who have retired, or have number given their option for absorption, to be absorbed in the vacancies in other polytechnics of the State of Government, which are recognized and funded or in any other technical institution, or any post which it may deem to be fit, in accordance with their eligibility and after relaxing age and other terms and companyditions of recruitment.
By the impugned judgment the High Court allowed the special appeal.
The State Government is directed to draw the list, prepare the scheme and to offer appointment by absorption, preferably within a period of four months.
31.3.1999 and the workmen employed were to be retrenched after paying companypensation.
There is numberorder as companyt.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows Retrenched employees of Institute of Engineering and Rural Technology for short IERT , 105 in number, filed a writ petition against the State of U.P. and its functionaries as well as the IERT praying for quashing the order dated 24.3.1999 by which it was decided that the Training cum Production Centre of IERT was to be closed down w.e.f.
CIVIL APPEAL NO.
4590 OF 2004 With Civil Appeal No.4606 of 2004 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. These appeals are inter linked and are directed against companymon judgment of the Allahabad High Court.
By the impugned judgment the order passed by the learned Single Judge was set aside.
