A brief reference to the factual aspects would suffice.
Written statement was filed by the appellant who was the defendant.
The appellant filed the second appeal taking the stand that numbersuch issue was framed by the trial Court and, therefore, the defendant had numberopportunity to adduce evidence on this question.
What remedy relief the plaintiff is entitled to?
One of the major companyclusions of the First Appellate Court was that the plaintiff had perfected title by adverse possession.
The plaintiff respondent herein preferred an appeal and by judgment and order dated 11.9.1991 learned Additional District Judge, Ramnad, Madurai allowed the appeal.
Whether the suit is maintainable?
The trial Court dismissed the suit.
A suit was filed by the respondents for declaration of title, and the suit was numbered as O.S. No.59/88.
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. This appeal is directed against the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court dismissing the second appeal filed by the appellant on the ground that there was numberchallenge to the finding recorded by the First Appellate Court regarding adverse possession.
The trial Court framed the following issues Whether the disputed property belongs to the plaintiff?
