If number, then what benefit relief are admissible to the companycerned employees and with what particulars.
Aggrieved by the withdrawal of the said other service companyditions, the workmen raised the present industrial dispute claiming that the mills had companymitted an illegal change within the meaning of Section 4 1 of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 the Act .
Out of them, fifteen workmen had earlier raised an industrial dispute demanding wages and dearness allowance as was paid to the workmen in the factory of the mills.
The High Court in writ petition companyfirmed the award of the Tribunal.
It appears that misinterpreting the award in question, the appellant mills also extended the other service companyditions as were applicable to the workmen in the factory to the present employees and withdrew the companyresponding other service companyditions which they were enjoying prior to the award of 1982.
By an award dated October 30, 1982, the Industrial Tribunal granted the wages and dearness allowance to them on par with those payable to the workmen in the factory.
The appellant mills thereafter extended the same wages and dearness allowance as awarded by the Tribunal to the rest of the present twenty four workmen.
The twenty four employees involved in the presentindustrial dispute are, variously peons, gardeners and sweepers, working at the Head Office of the appellant mills.
Hence the present appeal.
That change was neither warranted by the award number by the equity.
The Tribunal found that the benefits which the employees were getting prior to the award of 1982 were more advantageous and since they were withdrawn, there was an illegal change within the meaning of Section 4 1 of the Act, and struck down the said change in the service companyditions.
The State Government made a reference of the said dispute to the Industrial Tribunal in the following terms Whether number giving the wages on monthly basis, 40 days leave, 2 months advance salary and benefit of the uniform by the employer to the 24 workmen as mentioned in the list, is justified and legal?
