The Judgment of the Court was delivered by JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J. Leave granted.
Mahendra Raj, the companymon petitioner in S.L.P. Nos.
7146 and 11425/90, is a tenant occupying the premises of the respondent Col.
The eviction order was challenged by the tenant by means of revision petition before the Delhi High Court.
Almost simultaneously, the tenant also filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, challenging the validity of Section 14 B. On 10 May 1990, the High Court dismissed the revision as well as the writ petition.
Against the judgment of the High Court dismissing the writ petition, the tenant has preferred SLP No.
7146 of 1990.
From the Judgment and Order dated 10.5 1990 of the Delhi High Court in Civil Writ Petition Nos.
Against the order dismissing the revision petition, the tenant has preferred SLP No.
The tenant challenged the decision of the High Court by preferring Special Leave Petition No.
1381, 2994 of 1989 and C.R. No.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
838 and 839 of 1991.
Soli J. Sorabjee, Attorney General, Kapil Sibal, Additional Solicitor General, G.L. Sanghi, Dr. Y.S. Chitale, Harish N. Salve, H.K. Puri, Rajeev Sharma, Ravinder Nath, B. Saharya, P.K Jain, Krishna Moorthy Iyer, Prem Malhotra, A.C. Sehgal, Mrs. Urmila Sirur, R.L. Jain, S.K. Tredal, Ms. kitty Kumarmanglam, R.P. Dave, Mrs. Sushma Suri, Ms. M. Biswas and Ashok Mathur for the appearing parties.
954 of 1989.
