1 hereinafter referred to as the respondent , alleging that she was married to the said respondent and an amount of Rs.
10,000/ from her parents for his business.
She further alleged that her husband often used to beat her and had been insisting that she should get another sum of Rs.
Later at the instance of her mother in law, who was also made an accused, she was being maltreated and even abused by the accused persons including her husband.
5,000/ along with gold ring and wrist watch, was given to him on the eve of the marriage.
Ultimately, the respondent married again and has got a second wife.
The other accused persons have actively associated themselves with the second marriage.
It was stated that earlier she had lodged a First Information Report, but when numberaction was taken by the police, the companyplaint aforesaid was being filed in the year 1990.
P. Singh J. Leave granted.
The validity of an order passed by the High Court, in exercise of the power under Section 492 of the CrPC hereinafter referred to as the Code , quashing the criminal proceeding which has been initiated against the accused respondents, has been questioned in this appeal.
The appellant filed a petition of companyplaint against her husband, accused respondent No.
