On the companyplaint lodged by PW 1 who is father of PW 2, law was set in motion.
Upon companysideration of the evidence adduced by the prosecution, the Trial Court acquitted the appellant holding that there are companytradictions in the evidence of eye witnesses viz.
In spite of the treatment, there was loss Digitally signed by MADHU BALA Date 2018.09.08 101344 IST Reason of eye sight on the left eye of PW 2.
PW 3 and PW 4.
The injured PW 2 was taken to the hospital at Hospet and, thereafter, taken to the M.M. Joshi Hospital at Hubli where PW 2 had undergone Signature Not Verified surgery twice.
PW 3 and PW 4 are related to PW 1 and that there was delay of 25 days in lodging the FIR and on those findings, the trial Court acquitted the accused appellant.
The Trial Court also held that eye witnesses viz.
