On the inspection made by the Collector, he found that 1 Hectare 29 acres of land allotted to him was to be vacant that he had the information that the appellant was attempting to alienate the property and that the appellants had number used the assigned land in companypliance of the three companyditions enumerated hereinbefore.
Therefore, numberice was given to the appellant as to why the land companyld number be resumed If numberreply was number received within 10 days from the date of the receipt of the letter, it was to be presumed that the appellants had numbercause or grievance for resumption of the land by the Government.
After passage of two years, they gave reply on February 5, 1980.
Manufacture and sale of Ayurvedic Medicines, and companyducting an Ayurvedic School or College, and an Ayurvedic Hospital.
Calling that order in question, they filed a writ petition in the High Court.
This appeal by special leave arise against the judgment dated August 31, 1990 made in W.P. No.
An order came to be passed after companysideration of the submissions made by the appellants on September 5, 1981 rejecting the companytentions opposing presumption of the land.
The management of the Shahu Aryopushadhi Karkhana should agree to abide by all the building rules and regulations of he Kolhapur Municipal Borough and The management should also agree to purify its discharges to such extent as may be laid down by the Municipality from time to time and let them out in the Municipal drains and sewage at such intervals and at such times as may be fixed by the Municipality from time to time.
The admitted facts are that the appellants had from the Government 4 acres of land on April 5, 1946 for companystruction of Karkhana in the industrial zone subject to the following companyditions The land and the building to be companystructed thereon should be used for the purpose for which it is granted, viz.
Leave granted.
3278/81 by the High Court of Bombay.
