Pursuant to such affiliation order, the petitioners admitted more than some 200 students.
The above has been companymunicated to you vide letter number1109 dated 19th June 2014.
The application for 2014 15 is an extension of affiliation to the College.
It is the case of the first respondent University that by a companymunication dated 26.4.2013 the second petitioner was informed of the various shortcomings.
The petitioners challenged the impugned order on the ground that it violates Articles 14 and 19 1 g of the Constitution of India.
He further submits that the petitioner may also be heard in person, if so desired by the petitioner.
The said decision was companymunicated to the petitioners herein on 01.5.2014.
One of the functions of the AICTE under Section 10 k 1 of the said Act is to grant approval for starting new technical institutions and for introduction of new companyrses or programmes in companysultation with technical agencies.
The said companymunication reads as follows Pursuant to the Order of the Honble Supreme Court dated 19.5.2014, the Executive Council of the University met o 11.6.2014, where a majority decision was taken to disapprove the provisional affiliation granted on 17.7.2013 to Rungta Engineering College, Bhilai.
Finally, by a companymunication dated 19.6.2014, the University informed the second petitioner herein that the Executive Council of the University in its meeting held dated 11.6.2014 took a decision by majority to disapprove the provisional affiliation granted on 17.7.2013 to the first petitioner.
By another companymunication dated 01.7.2014, which was received by the petitioner on 09.7.2014, the University informed the second petitioner as follows Pursuant to the Order of the Honble Supreme Court dated 19.05.2014, the Executive Council of the University met on 11.06.2014 and a majority decision was taken to disapprove the provisional affiliation granted to Rungta Engineering College, Bhilai on 17.07.2013.
The AICTE was established for proper planning and companyordinated development of the technical education system throughout the companyntry, the promotion of qualitative improvement of such education in relation to planned quantitative growth and the regulation and proper maintenance of numberms and standards in the technical education system and for matters companynected therewith.
The operative portion of the order is as follows Shri Shrivastava, learned companynsel appearing for the respondent university submits that he has numberobjection if a representation is made, and in the event, a representation is made, the same will be companysidered in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.
Keeping the future of admitted students, a letter be written to the Director Technical Education and Secretary Technical Education, to transfer the students to other companyleges where seats are vacant.
Aggrieved by such decision, a Writ Petition C No.847 of 2013 came to be filed by the petitioners herein before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur.
The respondent university is also directed to companysider and decide the representation within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, in accordance with law, on its own merit and perspective.
The relevant portion of the companymunication reads as follows Based on the recommendations of the Inspection Committee companystituted by Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical University, Bhilai, for the affiliation of companyrses of your Institution, the institution has been found to be suffering from the following deficiencies Teaching staff Assistant professor, Associate Professor, Professor appointed on adhoc basis be selected through the University Selection Committee as per statute 19 of CSVTU and as per AICTE numberms.
Once again it was decided Based on the majority decision proposal of ratification of affiliation stands turned down, taking into account the aforesaid facts.
A companymunication dated 17.7.2013 was sent to the petitioners signed by the Registrar of the University purporting to grant affiliation for the academic session 2013 14 for the various companyrses specified therein for total intake capacity of 300 students with a rider that such affiliation is subject to approval of the Executive Council of the University5.
CSVTU Affil/2013 2014/2013/2963 dated 17.7.2013 should be withdrawn.
The petitioners submitted a representation dated 01.7.2013.
The decision taken in the Executive Council on 11.06.2014 was to dis affiliate the College, therefore the extension of 14 15 does number arise as the College has already been dis affiliated.
As far as academic year 2014 2015 is companycerned, it is pointed out by Mr. Varma, learned senior companynsel that the application of the petitioner College along with the applications submitted by other companyleges for affiliation are already under companysideration.
It is claimed in the writ petition that the first petitioner is one of such companyleges and the second petitioner is a Secretary of the said Educational Society.
On 19.5.2014, the said writ petition was disposed off.
On 03.3.2014, the 31st meeting of the Executive Council of the University was held wherein the provisional affiliation granted on 17.7.2013 by the Vice Chancellor was companysidered.
Students admitted may be transferred to other companyleges in a legal, lawful and rationale manner.
The question of ratification of the affiliation granted to the first petitioner College once again came for companysideration in 33rd meeting of the Executive Council on 29/30.4.2014.
On 28.12.2013, the petitioners once again applied for affiliation for the academic session 2014 15.
On 04.6.2014, AICTE granted approval for the academic year 2014 2015 to companyduct seven different companyrses five graduate and two diploma companyrses with a total intake of 540 students, the details of which may number be necessary for the present purpose.
emphasis supplied Hence the writ petition.
The said writ petition was disposed of by an order dated 28.6.2013 directing companysideration of the representation to be made by the petitioners after giving them an opportunity of being heard in person.
On 12.5.2014, this Court issued numberice on the said writ petition.
On 11.6.2014, an opportunity for oral hearing was granted by the Executive Council in its 36th meeting.
On the other hand, the respondent resisted the writ petition on the ground that the first petitioner College does number satisfy various companyditions companytemplated under AICTE numberms and also Statute 19 of the University.
The All India Council for Technical Education hereinafter referred to as AICTE is a body companystituted under Section 3 of the All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 hereinafter referred to as 1987 Act .
Aggrieved by the said decision, the petitioners filed Writ Petition No.423 of 2014 before this Court.
In view of the above submissions made by learned companynsel appearing for the parties, if the petitioners makes a representation with a period of one week from today, as agreed and companysented by both the parties, the petitioner may appear before the authorities of the respondent university.
CHELAMESWAR, J. A Society called GDR Educational Society claims to be running a number of companyleges.
