The suit was decreed on 31.7.1997 declaring that the appellant was entitled to be appointed and directing the appellant State to companysider her for appointment within a period of three months from the date of decree.
The respondent herein filed a civil suit alleging that she was number appointed by the State, though selected for the post of Mid wife, while other candidates with lesser merit were appointed on 17.6.1986.
The First Appellant Court, however, decreed the suit in part and declared that she was entitled to all monetary benefits, seniority and length of service with effect from 8.10.1991 the date of filing the first suit .
The State filed a second appeal which was dismissed and the SLP filed by the State was also dismissed.
The respondent filed a fresh suit claiming that she should have been appointed with effect from 17.6.1986 with all companysequential benefits including salary and allowances.
O R D E R Arising out of SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION C NO.
The State went in appeal against the decree and that appeal was dismissed.
10668 OF 2006 Leave granted.
Only thereafter, the respondent was appointed on 31.8.2000.
That suit was dismissed.
Heard both sides.
