After companysidering the evidence which was recorded in the inquiry under Section 200 of Criminal Procedure Code, the 7th additional, district judge, Meerut arrived at the companyclusion that on the basis of available evidence on record, the trial companyrt rightly exercised its jurisdiction in summoning the accused.
By order dated 30.1.2001, IIIrd judicial magistrate, Meerut issued summons for the offences punishable under Sections 323/34, 324/34, 307/34 and 506 IPC, in companyplaint No.
830 of 2002 was preferred before the High Court and the High Court set aside the order passed by the magistrate issuing summons against respondent Nos.
Hence, revision application was dismissed by judgment and order dated 25.1.2002.
154 of 2001 before the sessions judge, Meerut.
2 and 3 preferred criminal revision No.
Against that order, criminal misc.
writ petition No.
Heard the learned companynsel for the parties.
Leave granted.
Against that order, respondent Nos.
1406 of 2000.
