The prescribed authority companysidered the case of the landlord as also the defence put forward by the defendant tenants and held that on the facts and in the circumstances, it was proved by the landlord that he required the premises for his bona fide use.
6690/2005contd may be granted in favour of the tenants and, accordingly, an order was passed directing the appellant landlord to make available to the tenants, the alternative accommodation in respect of which he has obtained a decree of possession from another tenant.
The appellant landlord has questioned the legality of the order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated July 30, 2003 passed in Civil Misc.
He required suit premises for his bona fide requirement and hence he initiated the proceedings under Section 21 1 of the Act.
Being aggrieved by the said order, the tenants preferred an appeal under Section 22 of the Act.
Accordingly, an order of eviction was passed against the tenants and in favour of the landlord.
Writ Petition No.
31938 of 2002.
The case of the appellant is that he is the landlord.
