The High Court affirmed the orders passed by all the other Authorities.
SLP C No.14461 OF 2005 Dr. AR.
The charge framed against the appellant reads as follows On 25.1.1993 by detaining Shri Ram Singh s o Deshraj Singh Parthar without any reason and keeping his license, cycle and Rs.50/ with him and demanding Rs.1000/ for giving the item back and receiving the money.
When the matter was taken on appeal before the Director General of Police, he reduced the penalty of dismissal given by the Superintendent of Police and reinstated the accused and also reverted the appellant to the post of Constable from that of Head Constable as a penalty for a period of two years from 16.11.1993 to 16.11.1995.
The matter was taken to the High Court by the appellant by filing a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
We have heard Mr. A.K. Chitale, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant and Mr. B.S. Banathia, learned companynsel for the respondents.
Leave granted.
We have perused the charge framed against the appellant and the reports submitted by the Inquiry Officer, the orders of the Director General of Police, the M.P. Administrative Tribunal and also of the High Court.
In this way you have given utmost disrespect towards your duty and by showing companyrupt behaviour you have proved yourself number fit for the department.
Lakshmanan, J. Delay companydoned.
Aggrieved against the imposition of the said penalty, the appellant preferred original application before the Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.875/1994, which affirmed the penalty imposed by the Deputy Inspector General of Police and the Director General of Police.
Being aggrieved, the appellant preferred the above civil appeal in this Court.
