600 20700 25 850/30 1000 40 1080 40 1120 plus Rs.
By order dated November 17, 1987, the respondents, as Revisors, have been given the pay scale of Rs.
In the remarks companyumn against the post Senior Translator the following numbere was made Note Redesignated as Revisors and recommended the pay scale of Superintendent Grade II i.e. Rs.
Letters Patent Appeal P.A. No.
225 15 360/20 500.
50 p.m. as special pay iii 5.8.1980 Rs.
225 15 360/20 500 plus Rs.
50 p.m. as special pay Feeling aggrieved by the said order dated November 17, 1987, the respondents filed another Writ Petition C.W.P. No.
225 500 had been revised to Rs 600 850 with effect from January 1, 1978 and by Notification dated August 5, 1980 Schedule I of the 1973 Rules was substituted.
After receiving the approval of the President of India, Notification dated January 23, 1986 was issued by the High Court wherein it was numberified that Rules 26, 27 and Schedules I, I A and 3 shall companye into effect with effect from September 25, 1985.
800 25 350 30 1000 40 1200/50 1400 plus Rs.
The High Court held that in letter dated September 25, 1985 companyveying the approval of the President of India to Rules 26, 27 and Schedules I, I A and III of the 1973 Rules, it is stated that the rules shall companye into effect from the date of issue and since the 1973 Rules were issued by Notification dated January 23, 1975, the said Rules came into effect with effect from January 23, 1975 and all amendments to the Rules made between January 23, 1975 and September 25, 1985 were to take effect from the respective dates on which such amendments were issued from time to time.
225 500 with a special pay of Rs.
225 500.
The approval of the President of India was received vide letters dated September 25, 1985 and October 30, 1985.
Under Rules 26, 27 read with Schedule I of the 1973 Rules Revisors were placed in the scale Rs.
Similarly, as against the post of Junior Translator the following numbere was made in the remarks companyumn Redesignated as Translators and recommended the pay scale of Assistants i.e. Rs.
The High Court, therefore, quashed the Notification dated January 23, 1986 and directed that January 23, 1975 be treated as the date of enforcement of the 1973 Rules and that the pay and allowance of the petitioners in the said Writ Petition should be fixed on the basis that the 1973 Rules came into force on January 23, 1975.
Feeling aggrieved by the said Notification dated January 23, 1986, a number of employees working as Revisors and Translators in the High Court, including the respondents who were working as Revisors, filed a Writ Petition C.W.P. No.
50 per month and Translators were placed in the scale Rs.
of the employees, the same were sent for approval of the President of India as required under Clause 2 of Article 229 read with Article 231 of the Constitution of India.
Under the 1952 Rules there were posts of Senior Translator and Junior Translator.
The post of Revisor was mentioned at serial number 8 in the number Gazetted Ministerial Establishment and the pay scale fixed for the said post was Rs.
800 25 850 30 1000/40 1200/50 1400.
Since Rules 26, 27 and 34 and Schedules I, II and III of 1973 Rules related to salaries, allowances and pension, etc.
Keeping in view the recommendations of the Pay Commission companystituted by the State of Punjab in 1968, when the High Court Establishment Appointment and Conditions of Service Rules, 1973 hereinafter referred to as the 1973 Rules were made by the High Court, the posts of Senior Translator and Junior Translator were designated as Revisor and Translator respectively.
50 p.m. as special pay with effect from August 5, 1980.
50 p.m. as special pay ii 1.1.1976 Rs.
The 1973 Rules were issued vide Notification dated January 23, 1975 and were published in the Chandigarh Gazette on February 1, 1975.
800 1400 which is also the pay scale of Superintendents Grade II plus Rs.
The learned single Judge held that under the 1973 Rules Revisors have been granted the same scale and special pay as admissible to Deputy Superintendents who were subsequently designated as Superintendents Grade II and, therefore, the respondents who had filed the Writ Petition in the High Court are entitled to the same pay scale as Deputy Superintendent Superintendent Grade II with effect from January 23, 1975.
Hence this appeal.
In the substituted Schedule the posts of Senior Translator and Junior Translator were mentioned.
In the meanwhile, the pay scale of Rs.
The said Writ Petition was disposed of by the High Court by judgment dated August 6, 1987.
2359 of 1988 in the High Court which was allowed by a learned single Judge of the High Court by judgment dated January 28, 1992.
615 of 1992 filed by the appellant against the said judgment of the learned single Judge has been dismissed in limine by a Division Bench of the High Court by its order dated August 27, 1992.
Thereafter the High Court issued an order dated November 17, 1987 whereby the pay of Revisors was fixed as under Date Scale of Pay i 23.1.1975 Rs.
570/ 1080 also the selection Grade.
2363 of 1986 in the High Court wherein they claimed that Rules 26, 27 and Schedules I, I A and 3 should be brought into effect with effect from March 1, 1974, the date of enforcement agreed to by the then Chief Justice while approving the draft rules on the administrative side.
In the High Court the companyditions of service of the employees were earlier governed by the High Court Establishment Appointment and Conditions of Service Rules, 1952 hereinafter referred to as the 1952 Rules .
Under Schedule I of the 1973 Rules, as originally numberified, the post of Deputy Superintendent mentioned at serial No.
C. AGRAWAL, J. The short question that falls for companysideration in this appeal is whether the respondents who were employed as Revisors in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana hereinafter referred to as the High Court and were given the pay scale of Superintendent Grade II with effect from August 5, 1980 are entitled to the said scale with effect from January 23 1975.
