By a similar agreement dated February 20.
The appellant had, on February 9, 1964, entered into an agreement with the railway administration by means of which he was allotted a Tea Table hereafter described as Tea Stall at Katol railway station.
Appeal by special leave from the order dated October 23, 1969 of the Gujarat High Court in Criminal Revision No.
This agreement came into force from may 18, 1964 and subject to the provisions for earlier termination was to remain in force for three years.
In addition to other terms for earlier termination, the agreements were also terminable under clause 52 by one months numberice on either side without assigning any reason.
On July 11, 1965 the two Stalls were inspected by the Commercial Inspector and the Station Master and it was found that the appellant had companymitted irregularities and was number running them in accordance with the directions of the railway administration.
The amount of fine having number been paid within the stipulated period a numberice was given to the appellant on September 16, 1965 for vacating the railway premises by October 30,,1965.
The appellant having failed to vacate the premises, the agreements were terminated with effect from November, 1965.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.51 of 1970.
1965 the appellant was allotted a Refreshment Stall at the same railway station for a period of three years subject to the provision for earlier termination similar to the first agreement.
Under these agreements the terms of which are identical the appellant was to run the two stalls in accordance with the directions of the railway administration.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Dua, J. In this appeal by special leave the appellant who has appeared in person challenges the order of a learned single Judge of the Gujarat High Court Shelat J. dismissing in limine criminal revision against the, order of the Sessions Judge dated October 4, 1969 dismissing the appellants revision from the order of the Judicial Magistrate, Kalol dated August 30, 1969 granting the application of the railway administration under S. 138 of the Indian Railways Act and directing the P.S.I. Railways at Sabarmati who is also the P.S.I. Railways at Kalol to secure possession of the stalls in question from the appellant to the railway administration or to the person appointed by the administration in that behalf.
The appellant appeared in person.
P. Nayar, for the respondent.
407 of 1969.
In both the agreements the appellant was described as the licensee.
