M3/M.A. 4/81 dated 16.4.1981.
The Appellants, who are willing to purchase the said lands at a price four times the price offered by Respondents 5 to 24, that is to say at Rs.
1,90,000 at 10 p.a.
The Commissioner, endowment, has accorded sanction to the proposed transaction of sale at Rs.
From the Commissioner, Endowments Department, Lr No.143/M.A. 4/81 dated 1.12.81.
10 lacs within three months thereafter as earnest money with the companydition that the amount of Rs.
2,50,000 per acre.
If the Commissioner, Endowments, companysidered Rs.
The appellants have reaffirmed this firm offer at the time of the hearing of this appeal.
60,000 per acre would have fetched Rs.
8 Lakhs.
From the Judgment and Order dated 24.12.1984 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in W.P. No.
20,00,000 deposited in this Court which will be transmitted to the Commissioner, Endowment in due companyrse , shall be treated as the deposit made by them in pursuance to clause 3 herein.
In companypliance with this Order the appellants have deposited the sum of Rs.
This case be listed for hearing in the first week of March, 1986.
G 2 wide publicity should be given to the date, time and place of public auction to ensure that maximum number of intending purchasers attend the auction in order to offer their bids.
361/76 restraining the Manager from auctioning the lease hold rights before evicting him from the land.
5 the appellants offer made in this Court for purchase at the rate of Rs.2,50,000 per acre on the companydition specified in clause 1 herein will be treated as the minimum bid of the appellants and the sum of Rs.
4 special numberice shall be given to the appellants And the companycerned respondents herein.
acre Sri K. Subramanya Reddy 268/1A 1.81 62,500 Rupees Sixty x x x x x x x x two thousands five hundred only Smt.
Shravan Kumar Second Secretary to Government.
Read the following From the Commissioner, Endowments Department, Lr.
Name Sy.
We, therefore, direct that the lands in question may be sold by public auction in the following manner F 1 sale must be on the basis of as is where is whatever is subject to the rights, if any, of any of the respondents and of the other occupants, if any, in regard to the claim for alleged tenancy, sub tenancy, possession or of any other nature.
But then some one else may offer a still higher price at a public auction which is the mode prescribed by the Legislature .
1147 48 of 1986.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
232 Dated 12.2.1982.
in favour of the sitting tenants as detailed by private negotiations No.
20,00,000 Rupees Twenty Lakhs in due companyrse subject to the companydition that the said amount of Rs.
8 lakhs as against a yield of about 2 lakhs in respect of the transaction already approved by him.
The proposal to sell the lands to respondents 5 to 24 at Rs.
80 Lakhs likewise for it will fetch a yield of about Rs.
S. Vaidyanathan for the Appellants.
1,225 per annum as at present.
232 passed by the Government of Andhra Pradesh inter alia on the ground that it manifests total number application of mind to the essential pre conditions embodied in proviso to section 74 1 c .
2,50,000 per acre which will fetch a total sale price of approximately Rs.
All further proceedings including execution of sale deed are stayed.
19,20,000 and yielded an annual income of approximately Rs.
62,500 per acre offered by the latter, have challenged the impugned order dated 12th February, 1982 G.O. Rt.
K. Alamalamma 268/1F 2.00 Total 32.01 BY ORDER AND IN THE NAME OF THE GOVERNOR OF ANDHRA PRADESH .
lO Lakhs and odd as a fair and reasonable sale price he cannot but companysider Rs.
2,50,000 per acre, as against Rs.
The other terms and companyditions may be such as are usually incorporated in such public auctions by the Commissioner who shall specify them along with the above mentioned terms in the public numberice.
8 who claims to be a sitting tenant obtained a decree from the Court of District Munsiff, Tirupati, in O.S. No.
The facts of the present case involving The sale of lands which have been sanctioned Lo be sold for about Rs.
80,00,000 Rupees Eighty Lakhs and an annual income of Rs.
20,00,000 will be liable to be forefeited if they back out of the firm offer to purchase the land at the rate of Rs.
20 lakhs by private negotiations, instead of by public auction, which the appellants are prepared to purchase for about Rs.
80 lakhs, illustrate this point in a telling manner Background The legality and validity of a Government Order according permission to Bugga Math, Tirupathi, a religious endowment, in exercise of powers under proviso Lo clause c of sub section I of Section 74 of Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious and Endowments Act, 1966 Act to sell certain lands belonging to the Math by private negotiations to Respondents 5 to 24, at the price of Rs.
F P. Rao and R. Venkataramani for the Respondents.
5138/82 and 545 of 1982.
Extent Cost per Ac.
62,500 per acre has been questioned by the Appellants The impugned order, in so for as material, reads Revenue Endowments III Department, O. Rt.
20 lacs so deposited would be forefeited if the petitioners failed to purchase the land at the rate of Rs.
Order In The circumstances reported by The Commissioner, Endowment Department in the references read above, the Government hereby accord permission under proviso to clause c of the sub section I of Section 74 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious and Endowments Act 1966 Act 17 of 1966 for The sale of The lands belonging to Sri Bugga, Math, Tirupathi, Chandragiri Taluk, Chittoor dt.,
The income derived by the Math from these lands is Rs.
from the sale proceeds.
