Similarly the second property was sold for Rs.69,328 with the permission of the companyrt dated January 23, 1985.
Against the High Court judgment the present appeal by way of special leave has been filed.
From the Judgment and Order dated 19.9.1986 of the Madras High Court in C.R.P. No.
Property situate at ward No.
Venugopala Naidu and three others who are the present appellants filed interim application No.
Ramaswamy, Additional Solicitor General, K. Swami, S. Srinivasan, Rajyappa, S. Murlidhar, Diwan Balak Ram and K.D. Namboodari for the Respondents.
It was alleged that the negotiated sale was at a price which was almost 20 of the market price.
6 Gandhiji Road, in T.S. No.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
There was numberpublication in any newspapers or even in the companyrt numberice board inviting the general public.
The trustees filed interim application No.
2936 to an extent of 11484 sq.
2937 to an extent of 4429 sq.
The subordinate companyrt permitted the trustee to companytinue and framed a scheme decree dated September 9, 1910 for the future manage ment and administration of the trust.
Property situate at Muthukumara Moopannaar Road in T.S. No.
3577 of 1988.
Padmanabhan, Mr. T.A. Subramaniyam, R.N. Keshwani and Balakrishnan for the Appellants.
175 of 1985 in the original suit before the subordinate judge, Thanjavur for setting aside the orders dated October 27, 1984 and January 23, 1985 granting permission to the trust to sell the above mentioned two properties.
453 of 1984 in the Original Suit before the subordinate companyrt for per mission to sell the first property which was granted by the order dated October 27, 1984 and the property was sold for Rs.11,000.
3210 of 1985.
