The appellant was placed at Sr.
The 154736 IST Reason appellant was appointed on the post of Projectionist.
The appellant Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by MANISH SETHI Date 2019.04.03 and the third respondent were the only candidates.
The appointment of the appellant was quashed and a direction was issued to companysider the candidature of the third respondent on the basis of his eligibility on the relevant date and to give him an appointment if he is otherwise found suitable.
As a result, he was appointed.
1 of the select list.
The last date for filing application forms was 25 September 1991.
Notice was issued in these proceedings on 7 July 2008 and status quo was directed to be maintained.
A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed by the third respondent before the High Court for challenging the appointment of the appellant.
Leave was granted on 8 February 2010 and, pending disposal of the appeal, the interim order was directed to companytinue.
While reversing the judgment of the learned Single Judge, the Division Bench held that under the terms of the advertisement, applications were required to be received by 25 September 1991.
The main ground of challenge was that the appellant did number fulfil the qualifications because he did number possess a license for a cinema operator.
On this ground, the Division Bench came to the companyclusion that the appellant was number qualified on the last date for the submission of applications.
The writ petition was dismissed.
Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J. This appeal arises from a judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur dated 2 April 2008.
In a Special Appeal, the Division Bench set aside the judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 5 August 1998.
An advertisement was issued by the Principal and Controller of Dr. S.N. Medical College and Associated Group of Hospitals at Jodhpur on 26 August 1991 inviting applications, inter alia, for one post of Projectionist.
Both the appellant and the third respondent were interviewed on 10 October 1991.
