That appeal was dismissed on the 4th July 1967 through an order, paragraph 3 to 7 of which may be re produced for facility of reference The learned companynsel for the Delhi Administration replied that the issue of tickets was a companydition of a permit under Section 48 3 xiv of the Motor Vehicles Act.
The routes above mentioned were extended by the Punjab State authorities under permits granted by them for intra State routes companynecting different towns in the State of Punjab itself.
There is numberobjection to the same vehicle running on another route under a different permit, but it would be objectionable if passengers who embark on the route companyered by the inter State permit are given direct tickets to any town on the second route for which the vehicle holds on intra State permit.
On the 25th July 1956, officers of the two States came to an agreement whereby the State of Punjab was given the right to extend its services on inter State routes to any town in the State of Punjab.
1800 of 1968 From the Judgment and order dated 20 10 1967 of the Delhi High Court in Civil Writ No.
M. Tarkunde and Gautam Goswami for Respondent No.
Other permits for the Delhi Karnal route and other interstate routes were companynter signed in the same terms.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The Governments of the States of Punjab and Delhi entered into an agreement about 3 years back providing for the running of public service vehicles in routes which companyered each of the two States so that every one of such routes had one terminus in one of the States and the other in the other.
Destination board should be exhibited.
Ex parte against Respondents Nos.
Genl.,
In pursuance of the agreement one of the Governments would issue permits under the Motor Vehicles Act 1939 hereinafter referred to as the Act and the same would be companynter signed by the other State before the former plied its buses on the routes companyered by such permits.
Thus a permit was issued in favour of the Punjab roadways for the route from Karnal to Chandigarh so that the bus operating on the Delhi Karnal route would carry passengers from Delhi to Chandigarh via Karnal.
Yogeshwar Prasad and Mrs. Rani Chhabra for the Interveners.
One such permit related to the Delhi Karnal route and was companyntersigned by the State Transport Authority Delhi in the following terms Countersigned for the portion of the route Delhi Karnal from 31 7 1967 to 30 11 1967 subject to the companydition that tickets will be issued for the destinations bet wen Delhi and Karnal.
Bus will companyer the full route and all other companyditions applicable under Motor Vehicle Laws.
S. N. Anand and R. N. Sachthey for the Appellant.
N. Kacker, Sol.
1376 of 1967.
2 and 3.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KOSHAL, J. The facts giving rise to this appeal by the Delhi Administration on certificate granted by the High Court of Delhi against its judgment dated the 20th October 1967 in a petition under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India Civil Writ Petition No.
1376/ 67 are number in dispute and may be briefly stated.
