226 of the Constitution to quash the order dismissing him by issuing a writ of certiorari.
The dismissal order was challenged on various grounds.
Appeal from the judgment and order dated November 4, 1965 ,of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Misc.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Hegde J. Scope of Art.
After companysidering the same, the Inspector General of Police dismissed the respondent from service on November 30, 1963.
A departmental enquiry was initiated against him on the basis of certain charges, by the Superintendent of Police, Surguja, on June 24, 1962.
Thereafter the respondent moved the High Court under Art.
On the basis of the enquiry held by him, the Superintendent of Police companycluded that the respondent was guilty of the charges levelled against him.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
646 of 1964.
After holding the enquiry as prescribed by the Central Provinces and Bihar Police Regulations, the Superintendent of Police submitted his report to the Inspector General of Police, Madhya Pradesh through Deputy Inspector General of Police, Raipur.
Petition No.
K. Sen, M. M. Kshatriya and G. S. Chatterjee, for the respondent.
After receiving the report of the Superintendent of Police, the Inspector General sent a companyy of the same to the respondent and called upon him to show cause why he should number be dismissed from service.
He recommended his dismissal.
2554 of 1966.
N. Shroff, for the appellants.
The respondents appeal to the Government against the order dismissing him was rejected.
