3 4 on their being finally approved by the commission appointments of such officers to the service shall be made by the central government.
special leave granted.9 and 10 have been selected by the selection companymittee against the vacancies which are within the limit prescribed under rule 9 of the recruit ment rules.
they also sought quashing of the appointment of five other persons respondents 4 to 8 before the tribunal who had already been appointed to the indian administrative service ias by way of special selection.
the tribunal accepted the contention and set aside the selection of gurde and bayas.
the case of the civil service officers before the tribunal was that they were substantive members of maharashtra civil service for about 22/25 years and their names were placed on the select list for promotion to ias since the years 1986/1988 but they companyld number be appointed to the las because the vacancies occurring in the state of maharashtra were being filled by resorting to special selection and appointing persons like the appellant bayas and others.
3 3 the recommendations of the selection committee made under sub regulation 2 shall be placed before the state government concerned and the latter shall forward those recommendations to the companymission for approval along with the companyfidential record of the officers concerned and the observations if any of the state government on the recommendations of the selection companymittee.
these two appeals by way of special leave are by bayas and the state of maharashtra against the judgment of the tribunal dated july 19 1991.
we therefore allow the appeals set aside the impugned judgment of the tribunal dated july 19 1991 and dismiss the application of the civil service officers before the central administration tribunal.
from the judgment and order dated 19.7.1991 of the central administrative tribunal bombay in o.a.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by kuldip singhj.
h. school and three others civil service officers who are substantive members of the maharashtra civil service challenged before the central administrative tribunal new bombay bench the selection of w.g.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number1414 of 1993.
and by interviewing him.
and civil appeal number 1416 of 1993.
subha rao chander uday singh and mukul mudgal for the appearing parties.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 1416 of 1993.
number556 of 1990.
the tribunal however allowed the application so far as gurde and bayas were companycerned and quashed their selection to the ias.
with civil appeal number 1415 of 1993.
bina a.s.
bhasme c.v.
parekh sunil dogra ms.
the tribunal dismissed the application of school and others so far as the five persons already appointed to the las respondents 4 to 8 on the ground that the application was belated and barred by limitation.
the civil service officers challenged their selection primarily on the ground that there was numbermaterial on the record to show that there were special circumstances to the satisfaction of the central government.
r. reddy addl.
gurde and p.m. bayas to the indians administrative service by way of special selection under the rules.
