It was also alleged that after the termination of his service, fresh recruitments were made.
His seniority had number been companysidered, and employees who were junior to him were companytinued in service whereas he was terminated.
On the basis of the oral evidence, the Labour Court came to the companyclusion that the workman proved his case that he had worked with the employer for the last 10 years and the last wages drawn by him was Rs.22.50 and that he was discharged on 1.4.1991.
It is recorded by the Labour Court in Paragraph 4 of its Judgment that Exhibit 8 is the details pertaining to the attendance of applicant, which has been produced with application.
In response, the employer had filed its reply and companytended that the respondent was called for work, which depended upon the availability of the work and funds.
The xerox companyy of attendance register and muster register has been produced at Ex.10.
Both the parties led evidence.
P. Naolekar, J. The State of Gujarat had referred the industrial dispute to the Labour Court, Surendranagar for adjudication as to whether Shri Jethabhai Pitambarbhai is to be reinstated at its original position with full payment of salary.
After numberice the workman respondent filed his claim companytending therein that he had been in employment with appellant for last three years as a Daily Wager and was drawing an amount of Rs.22.70 per day that on 1.4.1991, he was given an oral numberice and was discharged from service.
