3 and 4 are his children.
The respondents alleged that the deceased was a businessman and his monthly income was Rs.15,000/ .
Thereafter, he was referred to AGMC and GBP hospital, Agartala, where he was declared dead.
Therefore, the appellant, being insurer of the vehicle, was number liable to pay the companypensation.
The appellant challenged the said award of the Tribunal before the High Court mainly companytending that the deceased himself was the owner cum driver of the offending vehicle.
The accident had occurred due to the negligence of the deceased.
10,57,800/ .
At the time of the accident he was aged 43 years.
They filed a claim petition seeking companypensation amounting to Rs.68,15,000/ .
When he reached near the bridge of Agartala Railway Station situated on the bye pass under Amtali police station, he met with an accident and sustained grievous injuries on his person.
He was number a third party within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for short the Act .
TR 01 U 0530.
On 20.5.2012 at about 7.00 p.m. Dilip Bhowmik was returning from Kathaltali to his house by driving his vehicle bearing No.
ABDUL NAZEER, J. Leave granted.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. has filed this appeal challenging the judgment and order in MACAP No.25/2015 dated 15 th March, 2017 whereby the High Court of Tripura at Agartala has directed the appellant insurer to pay the companypensation to the respondents awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, West Tripura, Agartala for short the Tribunal in a sum of Signature Not Verified Rs.10,57,800/ with interest at the rate of 8 per annum from the date of filing Digitally signed by SANJAY KUMAR Date 2018.08.31 145334 IST Reason of the claim petition till the date of payment.
He was initially rushed to Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Memorial Teaching Hospital, Hapania.
The Tribunal passed an award granting total companypensation in a sum of Rs.
The claim petition was opposed by the appellant insurer.
The first respondent is the mother of deceased Dilip Bhowmik.
The second respondent is his wife and respondent Nos.
