The bare facts accordingly are being referred to.
After some litigation between the parties which even brought the parties to this Court, the appellant filed a departmental appeal against the order of dismissal from service.
Disciplinary proceedings were accordingly initiated against the appellant for having produced a fake certificate in the name of Shri S.K.Basu and a charge sheet dated 28th October 1998 was issued to him.
Both the orders were impugned before the learned Single Judge and were quashed leading to the filing of the appeal before the Division Bench which reversed the same and upheld the order of dismissal.
It is in these circumstances that the present appeal has been filed by Shiva Anand.
On September 2, 1998 he again visited the Australian High Commission and submitted an employers certificate allegedly signed by Shri S.K. Basu, Senior Chief Manager of the Indian Airlines certifying that he had been granted privilege leave from September 1, 1998 to October 30, 1998.
It appears that in order to verify the companyrectness of the certificate the Australian High Commission got in touch with the Indian Airlines on which it was revealed that numbersuch certificate had been issued by Shri S.K. Basu.
After a detailed enquiry which the appellant repeatedly tried to obstruct, the enquiry officer tendered his report recommending that he be dismissed from service on which the punishing authority passed a final order to that effect.
On the 28th August 1998 he visited the Australian High Commission in New Delhi and applied for a visa for entry into Australia.
Shiva Anand, appellant herein, was an employee of the Indian Airlines and posted at Calcutta Airport.
In August 1998 he applied for a companycessional air ticket for a visit to Delhi and then proceeded to Delhi on 22nd August 1998.
This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court whereby it has set aside the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 2nd August 2002 which in turn had quashed the order of dismissal from service made against the appellant herein and directing his reinstatement with 50 back wages.
In the light of what has been stated by the learned companynsel for the parties, we find that a detailed discussion on the matters in companytroversy would perhaps number be necessary.
arising out of S.L.P. C No.
14352/2007 HARJIT SINGH BEDI,J. Leave granted.
The appeal too was rejected by order dated 18th January 2001.
