Thus the facts and circumstances state that because of the enmity relating to property business the accused planned to murder of the deceased with the companyaccused and entered into an illegal companytract with the other accused Rohitaas and Dharmendra to kill the deceased.
They murdered the deceased and for this work only the accused took the companyaccused Nasib Singh to the deceaseds house to make him familiar with the person supposed to be killed by them.
It surfaced during investigation that the accused and companyaccused Nasik Singh had hired two companytact killers Rohitas and Dharmendra for killing the deceased.
Application for bail was filed by the appellant before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaipur, who by order dated 6.6.2006 rejected the application.
The accused and the companyaccused had a long companyversation before and after the incident and this fact was number revealed by them in the earlier enquiries which clearly show the involvement of accused in the crime.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows On 18.9.2002, appellant lodged report about the killing of his brother by some persons.
The High Court was moved for grant of bail.
have companye up clearly by the enquiries.
