from the judgment and Order dated the 9th day of May 1974 of the Rajasthan High Court in W.P. Nos.
1608, 1622, 1623 1624, 1626, 1630, 1647, 1764, 1862, 1432, 1433 1871 of 1974.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAY C.J. These appeals by certificate turn on the question as whether the excise license granted to the appellants rendered them lube to pay the stipulated lump sum mentioned in the licence.
1213 1220 1862 .
1353, 1354, 1385 1386, 1387 1388, 1564, 1566 1567, 1579 1581.
D. Sharma, for the appellants In C.A. Nos.
Badri Das Sharma and S. R. Srivastava, for the appellants In C.A. Nos.
1385 .
CIVIL APPELLANT JURISDICTION Civil Appeals Nos.
S. Khanduja, for the appellants In C.A. Nos.
For the years 1962 63 and 1963 64 licences for sale of companyntry liquor were given to companytractors under a guaranteed system.
These appeals relate to companyntry liquor licences a for the years 1962 63 and 1963 64 b for the years 1967 68 and c for the years 1968 69, 1469 70 and 1970 71.
1353, 1354 and 1647 .
The appellants who were the liquor companytractors challenged the demand for short fall of the guaranteed amount.
1213 1220.
K. Sen and B. D. Sharma, for the appellts In C.A. Nos.
There was a total guaranteed amount.
1386 1388, 1530, 1564, 1566, 1567, 1579, 1580, 1581, 1606, 1622, 1624, 1626, 1630 1764 .
V. Patel and S. S. Khanduja for the appellants In A.No.
1623, 1432, 1433 and 1871 .
M. Singhvi and S. M. Jain, for the respondents In all the appeals .
1497 1503 1505/1971.
