15/140/81Personnel1 dated 27.02.1982.
3946 M S of 2005, by which the High Court has dismissed the said writ petitions preferred by the appellants herein P. State Road Transport Corporation and has companyfirmed the awards declared by the Labour Court holding that the original respondents before the High Court were entitled to be superannuated at the age of 60 years, the original petitioners U.P. State Road Transport Corporation hereinafter referred to as the Corporation and another have preferred the present appeals.
As companymon question of law and facts arise in these appeals, Signature Not Verified as such, arising out of the impugned judgment and order passed by Digitally signed by VISHAL ANAND Date 2019.04.16 145926 IST Reason the High Court, all these appeals are being disposed of by this companymon judgment and order.
5.2 Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court, the appellant Corporation has preferred the present appeals.
Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow in Writ Petition No.
1.1 Leave granted.
According to the appellants, accordingly in the year 1982, on the basis of the recommendations of the Second Pay Commission, the minimum pay scale of the drivers of the Corporation was revised to Rs.335/ from Rs.200/. According to the appellants, thereafter the Board of Directors, in exercise of their powers under Regulation 8 b of the Service Regulations, 1981, vide their Resolutions in 19841985 revised the classification of posts of all the employees, including the drivers and the latter were accordingly placed in Group C as their pay scale was already revised to Rs.335/ and above at the relevant time.
4139 M S of 2005 and Writ Petition No.
4138 M S of 2005, Writ Petition No.
It appears that the revision of pay scales and the revision in classification of posts for the State Government employees resulted in much agitation amongst the appellantCorporation employees and, therefore, there was a need to revise the pay scales and the classification of the posts of all the employees of the appellant Corporation.
