The Appellant raised the plea of maintainability of such an application.
This application was dismissed by the IIIrd Additional District Judge on 1st February, 2000.
This companytract companytained an arbitration clause which provided that arbitration was to be as per the rules of the International Chamber of Commerce for short ICC .
On 23rd October, 1997 the 1st Respondent filed a request for arbitration with ICC.
1st Respondent filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 hereinafter called the said Act before the IIIrd Additional District Judge, Indore, M.P. against the Appellant and the 2nd Respondent.
One of the interim reliefs sought was an order of injunction restraining these parties from alienating, transferring and or creating third party right, disposing of, dealing with and or selling their business assets and properties.
ICC has appointed a sole arbitrator 3.
The Appellant filed a Writ Petition before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Indore Bench.
It was held that the Court at Indore had jurisdiction and the application was maintainable.
The Appellant companytended that Part I of the said Act would number apply to arbitrations where the place of arbitration is number in India.
Briefly stated the facts are as follows The Appellant entered into a companytract with the 1st Respondent on 9th May, 1997.
N. VARIAVA, J. This Appeal is against a Judgment dated 10th October, 2000 passed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court.
