From the judgment and decree dated 27 3 1969 of the Allahabad High Court in Writ Petition No.
From the judgment and Decree dated the 27 3 69 of the Allahabad High Court at Allahabad in W.P. Nos.
P. Rana, for the appellant in C.As.
695/71 .
1 in C.A. No.
The whole procedure is set out in Regulations 4 to 7 of the Indian Police Service Appointment by Promotion Regulations, 1955, under which the select lists are to be revised and reviewed every year.
They were brought on the select list of the Indian Administrative Service in 1961 and 1962, under Regulations 4 to 7 of the Indian Administrative Service Appointment by Promotion Regulations, 1955.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
2, 3, 6 and 7 in C.A. No.
N. Sinha, Solicitor General for India, P. P. Rao and S. Nayar, for the appellant in C.A. No.
These two officers, who had officiated as District Magistrates for a number of years, had also been dropped from the select list for 1968 prepared in December 1967, after having companytinued in that list since 1961 and 1962.
Consequently, they filed petitions under Art.
CIVIL APPEALS Nos.
Both M. L. Capoor and K. N. Misra companytinued on the select list until the list for 1968 was prepared in December, 1967, when they were suddenly dropped from this list.
614 617/71 and for respondents Nos.
Petitions were referred to a Division Bench which decided them with the special appeals of Ganesh Singh Seth and Basant Kumar Joshi involving the same questions of law on similar facts.
614 617 of 1971.
695 of 1971.
605/71 .
These Writ.
Their special appeals were heard by a Division Bench with Writ Petitions of M. L. Capoor and K. N. Misra, because, as already observed, companymon questions of law were involved.
K. Garg and S. C. Aggarwal, for respondent No.
226 of the Constitution in the Allahabad High Court for quashing orders of alleged reversion.
2771 of 1968.
Ganesh Singh Seth and Basant Kumar Joshi have been members of the U.P. Civil Executive Service .
C, Chagha, R. A. Gupta and J. P. Goyal, for respondent No.
They had filed Writ Petitions against their alleged reversions which were dismissed by a learned Judge of the Allahabad High Court on 23 5 1968.
I in C.A. No.615/71 .
These appeals were allowed by the companymon judgment number under appeal before us.
695 and 616/71 A. Gupta and J. P. Goyal for respondent No.
617/71 .
to act under Regulations 8 and 9 are limited.
I in C.A. Nos.
They were eligible to be companysidered for promotion under Regulation 4 of Indian Police Service Appointment by Promotion Regulations, 1955, and came on the select list through the procedure for selection by a Select Committee companyfirmed by the Union Public Service Commission, and, finally approved by the State Govt.
1330 and 2771, 766 and 767 of 1968, respectively.
