54/2010.
2 and 3, Surinder Singh and Badan, her brothers, Appellant No.
After two days of such companyplaint, the dead body of the deceased Suraj was found.
Dev Wati, the wife of the deceased, Appellant Nos.
P.C. filed by the companyplainant was allowed and companysequently the appellants herein were summoned by the Sessions Court to face trial in Sessions Case No.
P.C. as well as a companyplaint for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 506 of the IPC were also pending against the deceased.
4, Smt.
Thereafter, an application came to be filed by the companyplainant under Section 319 of the Cr.
5 and 6, Raju and Kalu, two sons of her sisters.
It is relevant to numbere here that the deceased had allegedly been threatened by his wife and some of her relatives with respect to the ongoing matrimonial dispute.
The said proceedings were initiated by the wife of the deceased.
P.C. before the Sessions Court, which came to be allowed on the ground that on the insistence of Raju and Kalu, the deceased had gone along with them on their motorcycle on being told that the appellants herein and one Omi being the wife of the deceased and her relatives had called him for a companypromise in the matrimonial litigation pending between the deceased and his wife.
MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J. Leave granted.
Accused Rajpal Rajua, Prem Pal and Devender Deven were put to trial for the companymission of the offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for short the IPC , apart from other offences.
When the evidence was being recorded, PW9, Harkesh deposed before the Sessions Court implicating the appellants herein, i.e. Appellant No.1, Smt.
This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 16.10.2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Revision No.
Amarwati, her sister and Appellant Nos.
3135/10 OM upholding the judgment Signature Not Verified dated 09.11.2010 passed by the Sessions Court, Faridabad in Digitally signed by VISHAL ANAND Date 2019.01.24 162328 IST Reason Sessions Case No.
The brief facts arising out of this appeal are that a missing companyplaint came to be lodged by the brother of the deceased PW9, Harkesh .
In addition to the same, two other criminal cases were also lodged for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324 and 504 of the IPC.
