After almost 25 years of his alleged termination, the respondent filed a petition in the Labour Court, Haridwar 45/2014 questioning the legality and companyrectness of his termination.
Having heard the learned companynsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, we are inclined to allow the appeals in part and modify the impugned order to the extent indicated infra.
Heard Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, learned companynsel for the appellants and Mr. Pankaj Miglani, learned companynsel for the respondent.
By impugned order, the High Court modified the award of the Labour Court and instead directed reinstatement of the respondent in the State services but without payment of any back wages to him which has given rise to filing of the present appeals by way of special leave by the State before this Court.
The respondent, therefore, felt aggrieved and filed writ petition in the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital.
By impugned order dated 24.11.2015 passed in writ petition, the High Court modified the award dated 25.02.2015 in Workman Disputes Case No.45 of 2014 by which the Labour Court, Haridwar had awarded companypensation of Rs.30,000/ to the respondent in lieu of reinstatement and instead directed the State appellant herein to reinstate the respondent worker without awarding to him any back wages.
333 of 2016 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital.
By award 25.02.2015, the Labour Court awarded monetary companypensation of Rs.30,000/ in full and final satisfaction to the respondent workman against his claim of reinstatement and all companysequential benefits arising therefrom.
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Leave granted.
These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 24.11.2015 in W.P. Signature Not Verified No.1116 of 2015 and dated 27.06.2016 in RAMCC Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA Date 2019.01.07 174007 IST Reason No.
In our opinion, the case at hand is companyered by the two decisions of this Court rendered in the case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited vs. Bhurumal 2014 7 SCC 177 and District Development Officer and Anr.
Against this order, the State filed review application before the High Court.
