At that time, she possessed the educational qualification as Matriculate III Class while the rule required Matriculate I Class.
She was promoted as Assistant on 1 2 1974.
He was further promoted as Assistant on 26 6 1974.
Since the second appellant has died, his case need number be companysidered.
He had passed Higher Secondary Examination in III Division.
Appellant 2, Surjit Singh was appointed as Clerk in the Commission through the Employment Exchange on 8.6.1967.
After qualifying from the Selection Board, he was appointed as a clerk on regular basis on 28 8 1968.
Later on, she qualified from the Subordinate Service Selection Board and was appointed as a clerk on regular basis on 28 8 1968.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MOHAN, J. The facts lie in a narrow companypass.
The Government declined to accede to the request.
TO Smt Ravinder Sharma, Assistant No.
Hence, the present appeal.
Thereupon, the appellant was served the following memo by the Commission From S. Chatwal, PCS, Secretary, Punjab Public Service Commission, Patiala.
Therefore, the Commission recommended to the Government that the qualification required under Regulation 7 of the Regulations might be relaxed in the case of the appellant.
The appellant did number possess the requisite qualification as required under Regulation 7 of the Punjab Public Service Commission State Service Class 111 Regulations, 1967 hereinafter referred to as the Regulations .
Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant filed Letters Patent Appeal No.
Appellant 1, Smt Ravinder Sharma was appointed as a clerk in the Punjab Public Service Commission hereinafter referred to as the Commission through the Employment Exchange on 8 6 1967.
