On 07.08.1996, the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, issued guidelines regarding scheme of appointment of dependents of deceased employees on companypassionate grounds, which were entirely based on the observations of this Court in Umesh Kumar Nagpal vs. State of Haryana Ors.,
Based on the guidelines issued by the Government of India and the Indian Banks Association, the appellant Bank framed a scheme for appointment on companypassionate grounds for dependent of deceased employees.
Against this decision of the authority the respondent filed Civil Misc.
A memorandum of the same was presented before the Central Board of the Bank, which was approved on 16.11.1996.
On 05.03.2004, the Deputy General Manager of the Bank reconsidered the case of the respondent and declined appointment to the respondent on companypassionate ground after taking into companysideration the financial companydition of the family.
The Competent Authority thereafter declined the request of the respondent on 03.04.2004.
A dispute arising in 2000 cannot be decided on the basis of a scheme that came into place much after the dispute arose, in the present matter in 2005.It is against this order and judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, this Civil Appeal by way of Special Leave Petition is preferred by the appellant Bank in this Court.
On 01.08.1999, Record Assistant Cash Accounts in the Dhab Wasti Ram, Amritsar branch, Sri.
The appellants filed their reply on 03.05.2005.
On 07.01.2002, the companypetent authority of the Bank declined the application of the respondent in view of the scheme vis vis the financial position of the family.
The respondent, widow of Sri.
Sukhbir Inder Singh late , passed away.
Subsequently, on 23.08.1996, the Indian Banks Association issued a circular suggesting to all Public Sector Banks, certain amendments to the scheme on companypassionate appointment, while taking into account the financial companydition of the family, the family pension, gratuity, proceeds of LIC, etc should be taken into companysideration.
The respondent, widow of Sri.
This decision was companyveyed to the respondent by the appellants on 05.04.2004.
Writ Petition No.
Sukhbir Inder Singh applied for companypassionate appointment in the appellant Bank on 05.02.2000.
Sukhbir Inder Singh applied for companypassionate appointment in the appellant Bank on 05.02.2000 under the scheme which was formulated in 2005.
The High Court ordered reconsideration of the case of Jaspal Kaur, respondent herein by its order dated 11.12.2003.
Writ Petition No.
3077/2002 before the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
9629/2004 before the Punjab and Haryana High Court praying for quashing of the order dated 03.04.2004.
The said amount was naturally in the shape of a security for the marriage of the daughtersIn our companysidered view the aforesaid income is number sufficient for the bare maintenance of the family.
Thereafter, the respondent filed one more Civil Misc.
1994 4 SCC 138.
