M.P. No.5662 of 2014 in C.C. No.15 of 2014.
P.C. in the aforementioned pending trial for her discharge from the case on the grounds stated in the application.
P.C. praying for her discharge from the case.
5662/2014 before the Additional Special Judge for CBI cases at Chennai under Section 239 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 hereinafter referred to as the Cr.
Having heard the learned companynsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, we are inclined to dismiss this appeal with observations made infra.
The Additional Special Judge for CBI cases, by order dated 05.02.2018, dismissed the appellants application.
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Leave granted.
The appellant herein is arrayed as accused No.3 in C.C. No.15 of 2014 pending in the Court of XII Additional Special Judge for CBI cases, Chennai.
This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 04.05.2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Criminal Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Revision Petition No.445 of 2018 whereby the Single ASHOK RAJ SINGH Date 2019.07.01 171234 IST Reason Judge of the High Court dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by the appellant herein and affirmed the order dated 05.02.2018 of the XII Additional Special Judge for CBI cases at Chennai in Crl.
The appellant A3 filed an application Crl.
By impugned order, the Single Judge of the High Court dismissed the appellants criminal revision petition and affirmed the order dated 05.02.2018 of the Additional Special Judge for CBI cases giving rise to filing of this appeal by way of special leave in this Court by the appellant A3 .
The appellant felt aggrieved and filed criminal revision petition in the High Court at Madras.
A few facts need mention hereinbelow for the disposal of this appeal which involves a short point.
P. No.
The appellant is facing trial for companymission of the offences punishable under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Sections 7, 12 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 hereinafter referred to as the PC Act along with 6 other accused persons.
Heard Mr. Kapil Sibal, learned senior companynsel for the appellant and Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, learned ASG for the respondent.
