The order of the High Court is challenged on the ground that the High Court has companypletely lost sight of the requirements of Navy Order 4/99.
It was the Chief of Naval Staff who had decided the numberms.
5180 of 2006 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
The appellants call in question legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court allowing the writ petition filed by the respondent and holding that the respondent was eligible for promotion to the rank of Rear Admiral.
The High Court was of the view that there were two vacancies available and, therefore, the respondent who was eligible and at serial No.2 in the merit list was denied promotion.
