The appellant companytested the petition denying the bona fide requirement for the respondent and also service of numberice under the first proviso to Section 21 1 of the said Act.
The appellant challenged the validity of the said order dated 30.11.1998 in C.M.W.P. No.
8 of 1992 before the prescribed authority under Section 21 1 a of the said Act, for seeking eviction of the appellant from the premises for her bona fide requirement of personal occupation.
Immediately thereafter she issued a numberice to the appellant to vacate the premises.
In May 1992, she filed eviction petition No.
Urban Buildings Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction Act, 1972, was satisfied.
The respondent is the landlady of premises No.
In this appeal, the appellant tenant challenges the order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in C.M.W.P. No.
However, again on June 1, 1991, she issued the second numberice.
20/189 Chatai Mohal, Kanpur for short the premises .
She purchased the said premises on May 28, 1985.
1059 of 1999 dated 12.1.1999.
