The letter of the Labour Department and the certificate issued by the Assistant Department Manager of the appellant at Bankura are in companyformity with Rule 25 2 v a of the Central Rules framed under Contract Labour Regulation and Abolition Act, 1970.
Thus, the learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition.
3614 of 1992, they are entitled to wages on par with class IV employees of the appellant and sought for directions to make such payment as per the pay revised from time to time.
The rate is for the job and number for the person.
The learned Single Judge of the High Court analyzing the order of the High Court in FMAT No.
3614 of 1992, an appeal by special leave was filed before this Court which was disposed of with certain observations.
The appellant opposed the claim made in the writ petition on the ground that against the order of the Calcutta High Court in FMAT No.
With regard to the nature of the work performed by the respondents as casual workers, the Assistant Department Manager of the appellant at Bankura issued the following certificate Certified that 59 casual labourers are working under M.R.M. F.S.D. Bikna since 1976.
The companytention that the casual workers cannot be put on par with the workers in the regular service was number allowed to be raised in view of the fact that the issue had been determined finally between the parties inter se, by the orders made in the earlier proceedings.
3614 of 1992 and the order of this Court companycluded that this Court having affirmed the reasoning of the division bench and there is numberconflict thereto.
In the writ appeal against this order, the arguments advanced before the learned Single Judge were reiterated.
The minimum rates of wages fixed under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 for employees employed in organised sector are allowed to persons employed either as a badly or on casual or temporary basis.
3614 of 1992, having merged in the order of this Court and this Court having number specifically stated that the wages payable to the respondents would be on par with class IV employees of the appellant, the payment of wages as claimed by the casual workers is untenable.
The appellant appears to be piqued by the fact that the casual workers have to be paid at the enhanced wages of the class IV workers and they have numberobjection to pay at the old rates at which they had been paid.
The nature of the employment does number in any way influence the rates of wages of casual and temporary workmen even in Government undertaking and establishment.
Rajendra Babu, J. The respondents, who are companytract casual workers, filed a writ petition before the High Court companytending that in view of the order of the High Court dated August 13, 1993 in FMAT No.
