The effect of Section 554 of the said Act is that during the period of supersession the powers and duties of the Commissioners and Chairman shall be exercised and performed by the Administrator appointed by the State Government under that section.
It is necessary to briefly numbere some of the relevant provisions of the said Act in view of the companytentions urged in this appeal.
From the Judgment and order dated the 15th March, 1982 of the Gauhati High Court Agartala Bench in E.P. No.
As a result, the cancellation order ceased to be effective and respondent No.
The State Government thereafter had companyfirmed the order of dismissal.
was reinstated to the post of Accountant in charge of Agartala Municipality on 6th May, 1978 with immediate effect by the Administrator.
The appellant therefore preferred the appeal to this Court.
1 who was under suspension at the time of supersession was dismissed from service in the disciplinary proceedings against him by the Administrator of the Agartala, Municipality on 20th December, 1975.
The only point on which the election petition by the appellant petitioner was pressed before the High Court and the only point urged before us in this appeal, is whether the respondent No.
Proviso ii to Section 66 2 of the said Municipal Act provides that numberappointment carrying a monthly salary of more than two hundred rupees or a salary rising by periodical increments to more than two hundred rupees shall be created without the sanction of the State Government, and every numberination to, and dismissal from, any such numberination shall be subject to companyfirmation by the State Government.
1 was disqualified for being elected as a member or the House of People as he held an office of profit under the Government of Tripura within the meaning of Article 102 t a of the Constitution.
80 180 per month.
The main companytest was between the petitioner appellant and the respondent No.
So at the relevant time he was an Assistant Accountant and was Accountant in charge under the Agartala Municipality drawing a monthly salary of Rs.
On 6th January, 1980 the polling was held and the result of the election was declared on 8th January, 1980.
1 was a P.I. M candidate.
Such Commissioners shall be a body companyporate by the name of the Municipal Commissioners of the place by reference to which the Municipality is known, having perpetual succession and a companymon seal, and by that name shall sue and be sued.
I had secured 198335 votes as against the appellant who had secured 1,42,990 votes.
I was reinstated and it was further provided that the period between the date of dismissal all the date of reinstatement would he treated as period spent on duty for all purposes.
1 was declared elected.
Respondent No.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
8th December, 1979 was the date of filing of the numberinations.
Nominations were scrutinised on 11th December, 1979 and the withdrawal date was 13th December, 1979.
The Commissioners of the Agartala Municipality ware superseded by an order of the State Government under Section 553 of the Bengal Municipal Act, 1932 as extended to the State of Tripura in 1975.
1 was the Accountant in charge of the Agartala Municipality.
When the Left Front Government came in power in the State of Tripura, the respondent No.
K. Garg and S.C. Birla for the Respondent.
L. Sanghi, S K. Nandy and S. Parekh, for the Appellant.
The respondent No.
There were six candidates including the petitioner companytesting the said election.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J. This appeal arises out of the judgment and an order of the Gauhati High Court in an election petition.
1724 of 1982.
The respondent No.
Therefore, the question involved in this appeal, is, A whether an Accountant in charge of the Agartala Municipality holds all office of profit within the meaning of Article 102 1 a of the Constitution In order to determine this question, it will be necessary to refer to certain facts.
1 was employed in Agartala Municipality and held the post carrying the scale of pay of Rs.
It appears that the Deputy Secretary to the Government of Tripura by his letter dated 6th May 1978 had companyveyed to the Administrator, Agartala Municipality, decision of the Government for cancellation of the order of companyfirmation of the dismissal companymunicated to him on l9th December, 1975.
He companytested the mid term Lok Sabha election held in 1980 from the West Tripura Parliamentary Constituency as a numberinee of companygress 1 .
The respondent No.
On the relevant date, respondent No.
1, Ajoy Biswas.
The respondent No.
The petitioner appellant was a voter in the West Tripura Parliamentary Constituency from No.
7 Ramnagar Assembly Segment.
2 of 1980.
