1 and 2 had jointly perpetrated the crime and they had, caused the stab wounds on Harjinder Singh.
Accused 1 and 3 were arrested on the same day i.e. October 13.
Incised stab wound 3 cm x 1.5 cm on the left hypo chondric region on the front of the left side of the chest.
l0 and 11 to be absolutely truthful and hence he companyvicted Accused Nos.
The occurrence was witnessed by Gurcharan Singh P.W. 10 and also by Gurbax Singh P.W. 11 and one Kanwal Main Singh number examined .
Since the learned Sessions Judge has declined to place reliance on the statements and the recovery of the weapons, numberfurther reference to the weapons is called for.
I and 2 under Section 302 and Section 302 read with Section 34 I.P.C. respectively.
After the attack Accused 1 and 2 ran away from the scene with their respective weapons.
Dissection revealed that Injury No.
The defence of the two accused Was one of total denial.
1 but is of a doubtful nature as against Accused No.
2 and acquitted him.
10 in a car but he was pronounced dead by the, doctor at the hospital.
1 and 2 wanted to exclude all other sharers and secure for themselves the entirety of an ancestral house left by their grand father Jagat Singh.
Accused No.
There were proceedings under Section 107 Cr.
The acquittal of the respondent is challenged in this appeal.
Incised stab wound 3 cm x 1 cm on the back of the chest in between the scapular region, bone deep.
1 and his anuts son Parminder and in those proceedings also, deceased Harjinder Singh took sides with Parminder Singh.
The learned Sessions Judge found the testimony of P.Ws.
On receipt of intimation from the hospital, Ajit Singh, A.S.I, of Police proceeded to the hospital and recorded a statement Exhibit P 2 from Gurcharan Singh between 11.25 A.M. to 12.15 P.M. A case was registered against both the accused and a companyy of the Special Report was delivered to the Magistrate at 2.35 P.M. the same day.
P.C. between Accused No.
There are absolutely numbergrounds on the basis of which any differentiation can be made in companystruing the evidence of the prosecution witnesses as between Accused Nos.
Accused No.
Incised stab wound 2 cm x 1 cm on the front of the left side of the abdoman.
3 cm away from the left iliac chest.
However, their grand mother Shanti and aunt Paramjit Kaur would number give up their rights, and in this stand they were supported by deceased Harjinder Singh.
1 and 2 were both interested in gelling the ancestral house exclusively for themselves and hence they would have nurtured a companymon grievance against Harjinder Singh for the support he was extending to the other claimants who were number willing to forego their share in the house.
The Sessions Judge of Amritsar had companyvicted one Harcharan Singh Accused No.
1 under Section 302 I.P.C. and his younger brother Surjit Singh Accused No.
They are as under Incised stab wound 2.5 cm x 1 cm on the front side of the chest near the left nipple.
The occurrence had taken place in broad day light and was witnessed number only by Gurcharan Singh P.W. 10 but also by an independent witness Gurbux Singh P.W. 11 .
One of the daggers companytained human blood while the other companytained stains which were disintegrated.
The facts of the case can be set out with advantage with reference to the genealogical table given below Jagat Singh dead wife Santi Kararn Singh Kartar Singh Paramjit Kaur Parminder Singh Harcharan Surjit Singh Singh Accused No.
Accused Nos.
1 to 4 alone are set out.
Their uncle Kartar Singh posed numberproblem because he had already relinquished his rights.
On October 15 they gave statements to the police leading to the recovery of two daggers from places of companycealment.
2 had pireced the abdominal wall through the wall of the stomach.
2, Surjit Singh, the respondent herein.
the respondent herein under Section 302 read with Section 34 I.P.C. for having companymitted the murder of one Harjinder Singh on October 13, 1982 and sentenced both of them to undergo imprisonment for life.
On the fateful day of October 13,1982 Harjinder Singh and Gurchran Singh P.W. JO were proceeding to their shop at about 8.30 A.M. En route Accused 1 and 2 beset themselves on Harjinder Singh and stabbed him with the daggers carried by them.
1 inflicted a stab on the left side of the chest and another on the left flank of Harjinder Singh.
He was, however, tendered for cross examination but the accused did number avail of the offer.
Harjinder Singh was rushed to the hospital by Gurcharan Singh PW.
For the purpose of the appeal it will suffice if in jury Nos.
I Accused No.2 Harjinder Singh Gurcharan Singh Deceased P.W. 10 Accused Nos.
In the appeal filed by the two accused, the High Court companyfirmed the companyviction and sentence awarned to Accused No 1 but set aside the companyviction of the respondent Accused No.
2 inflicted a stab on the back and another stab near the hip of Harjinder Singh.
6 Dr. Jaswant Singh, P.W.9 companyducted the autopsy on the dead body of Harjinder Singh and found five incised wounds and two abrassions on the dead body.
1 and 2 were infuriated with Harjinder Singh for taking sides against them and the resultant grievance was the motive for the attack on the deceased.
18 cm below the left nipple.
They inflicted some more stabs and on receipt of them Harjinder Singh fell down.
1 had pierced the wall of the chest and entered through 5th intercostal space and pierced the pericardium and the heart through and through with about 600 CC of free fluid blood in the left chest cavity, and Injury No.
