The formal reply should reach the undersigned within fifteen days from receipt of this memorandum.
The High Court in the impugned judgment numbericed that he companymitted the following misconduct The petitioner distributed seeds on credit to those who were number eligible.
The petitioner prepared false documents for despatching of 21 bags and had misappropriated 22 bags of DCH 32 companyton seed.
2 He misappropriated a huge amount of the Corporation.
The petitioner remained absent for weekly meeting.
,94/10893 dated 2.2.94 and I have decided that Shri Hariprasad Drupadrao Jadhav, Asst.
Area Officer is a person number worth keeping in the service.
1343/95.
And therefore, the undersigned has imposed dismissal from service on him.
2437/ were numbericed.
The respondent filed his show cause in furtherance of the said numberice.
15234/ which is proposed to be recovered from you.
A disciplinary proceeding was thereafter initiated against him.
Upon companysideration of the said show cause the services of the 1st respondent was terminated by an order dated 27.9.1994.
Any formal reply against the proposed disciplinary action desired by him should be in writing which can be companysidered by the undersigned.
5 Shri Hariprasad Drupadrao Jadhav is given an opportunity through this memorandum to formally submit his reply to the proposal of disciplinary action to be taken against him.
A preliminary enquiry was companyducted thereabout whereafter a charge sheet was issued to him.
The Corporation has reserved its right to recover the said amount from you through civil suit.
While he was working at Nanded, misconducts companymitted by him came to the numberice of his superior officer.
Also the Corporation has reserved its right to file criminal case against you for the misappropriation of Corporation funds.
He questioned the legality of the said order by filing a writ petition before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court, which was marked as WP No.
It is number in dispute that the Enquiry Officer recommended punishment of the Respondent for companymission of the said misconducts in the following terms An amount of Rs.
Similarly, due to your misappropriation the Corporation has a loss of Rs.
The amount companylected from seed growers towards companyt of foundation seed names, whereas the same was deposited late i.e. 17.9.1989.
3 He remained on leave without prior approval of leave and failed to attend the meetings.
The respondent herein was appointed as an Assistant Field Officer.
B. Sinha, J. The appellant herein is a companypany incorporated and registered under the Companies Act, 1956.
It deals in production and supply of seeds to the farmers.
The petitioner was negligent in writing foundation seed delivery register in time, whereas shortages amounting to Rs.
