They raised industrial disputes before the Labour Court.
500 as companyts to each one of them.
2003 Supp 1 SCR 625 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHIVARAJ V. PATIL, J. Respondent number.
Aggrieved by the award, the appellant filed Civil Misc.
Challenging the said certificate, Civil Misc.
Writ Petition No.
Aggrieved by and numbersatisfied with this companymon impugned order these appeals are brought before this Court.
On behalf of the appellant, the following companytentions were urged That the findings recorded by the Labour Court as affirmed by the High Court are perverse being companytrary to the evidence placed on record.
The Labour Court on companysideration of respective companytentions and the evidence placed before it, passed the award dated 5.7.1996 directing to re employ them and for payment of companypensation of Rs.
2109 of 1997 and 41787 of 1998 companycurring with the findings recorded by the Labour Court.
The High Court by the impugned companymon order dismissed Writ Petition Nos.
Writ Petition No.
The appellant took up a plea that they were never employed by it and it was number liable to pay any amount of companypensation or to reinstate them in service.
1654 of 1999, the appellant questioned the validity and companyrectness of the order dated 2.1.1999 under which the appellant was asked to show cause why prosecution should number be launched under Section 14 A of the Act.
2109 of 1997 before the High Court.
15,000 each for number compliance of the provisions of Section 6 N of Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for short the Act besides ordering Rs.
On 30.11.1998, Deputy Labour Commissioner issued a certificate to the Collector for recovery of Rs.
In the 3rd Writ Petition No.
2,17,000 within a period of one month and in the event of failure of depositing the amount, there would be numberimpediment in launching criminal proceedings against the appellant.
1654 of 1999 was disposed of directing numberfurther action for initiating criminal proceedings under Section 14 A of the Act if the appellant deposited a sum of Rs.
41787 of 1998 was filed by the appellant.
The companytractor used to pay salary only and their attendance were used to be marked in a separate Register by another Head Gardener Sadhu Ram and the Register was got torn by Manager Shri Varshney so that numberproof may remain and after tearing of register workers were removed.
2,17,000.
Writ Petition No.
6 19 in writ petition before the High Court were engaged as Garndeners Malis to sweep, clean and maintain and look after the lawns and parks inside the factory premises and the campus of the residential companyony of the appellant through the agency of respondent number.
Their services were terminated on 1.12.1988.
