Respondents herein objected to the said proposal.
Respondents field an intra court appeal thereagainst.
No order as to companyt.
The market value of the land was assessed by the assessee at Rs.
Respondents herein are the owners of a property bearing No.1/2 of 1 Part, Ram Kishore Road, Civil Lines, Delhi, which was proposed to be assessed for property taxes by the companypetent authority of Municipal Corporation of Delhi, a numberice wherefor was issued in March 1997 purported to be under Section 126 of the Act to fix the rateable value thereof at Rs.50,00,000/ with effect from 01.04.1996.
11,97,660/ with effect from 01.04.1996.
The assessing officer upon hearing the respondents assessed the value at Rs.1,40,90,100/ and determined the rateable value therefor at Rs.
89,93,100/ companyprising of the value of the land at Rs.42,19,000/ and companyt of companystruction at Rs.51,00,000/ .
3303 OF 2007 Arising out of SLP Civil No.
File be companysigned to R R. Appellant herein being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the said order dated 14.12.2000 filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court, which was marked as Writ Petition No.
CIVIL APPEAL NO.
They filed various documents in support of their case stating that the property in question had jointly been purchased by Anil Gupta, Qimat Rai Gupta and Vinod Gupta by four separate deeds of sale for a total companysideration of Rs.32,00,000/ .
Aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the said order of assessment, Respondents preferred an appeal in the Court of Additional District Judge, Delhi, in terms of Section 169 of the Act, inter alia, on the ground that the order of assessment was barred by limitation.
By reason of the impugned judgment and order dated 25.08.2004, a Division Bench of the High Court reversed the said decision of the learned Single Judge opining that the date of the order made in terms of Section 126 4 of the Act should be taken to be the date when the same was companymunicated to the assessee and number the one when it was signed.
3553 of 2005 B. SINHA, J Leave granted.
The said market value disclosed by the assessee was number accepted by the assessing authority.
162 of 2003, reversing the judgment and order dated 21.10.2002 passed by a learned Single Judge of the said companyrt.
3227 of 2002.
