V V of ethyle alcohol.
On June 12, 1961, Vijaysingh, the appellant, and one Namdeo Shinde drove in a jeep at an excessive speed and dashed it against the wall of the office of the District Superintendent of Police, Akola.
Hence the present appeal.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Subba Rao, J. This appeal by certificate issued by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay raises the question of the companystruction of some of the provisions of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, hereinafter called the Act.
Appeal from the judgment and order dated May 2, 1963 of the Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench at Nagpur in Criminal Appeal No.
Both of them appeared to be intoxicated.
w v of ethyl alcohol.
In the jeep there was also a bottle with a label on it as Tincture Zingeberis.
The High Court heard both the matters together and allowed the appeal filed by the State and dismissed the revision petition preferred by the accused appellant.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
The said Magistrate companyvicted the appellant both under s. 66 1 b and s. 85 1 1 , 2 and 3 of the Act, but sentenced him only under ss.
Against the judgment of the Sessions Judge acquitting the appellant under s. 66 1 b of the Act the State of Maharashtra preferred an appeal to the High Court and against the order of companyviction under s. 85 1 1 of the Act the appellant preferred a revision to the High Court.
Vijaysingh was prosecuted before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Akola, under s. 66 1 b and s. 85 1 1 , 2 , and 3 of the Act.
66 1 b and 85 1 1 of the Act.
234 of 1962.
P. Rana, B. R. G. K. Achar and R. H. Dhebar, for the respondent.
The High Court also found on the expert evidence that blood alcohol companycentration on taking a numbermal dose of tincture zingeberis mitis would be about 0.007 per cent.
154 of 1963.
The Chemical Analyser to the Govern ment of Maharashtra examined the sample blood taken from The body of the accused by applying modified Cavettes method and gave his report to the effect that the sample blood of the accused companytained 0.207 mg.
N. Phadke and Naunit Lal, for the appellant.
