Pratap Singh and others, who were also the appellants in the said judgment of the High Court, approached this Court and at their instance, their appeal was allowed by this Court and the case was remanded.
The appellants and other claimants, number satisfied with the amount of companypensation so awarded, sought a reference under Section 18 of the Act.
2,000/ per bigha.
As a result, judgment and decree dated 11.10.1984 in their cases became final.
In the impugned judgment, the High Court has stated thus It is pertinent to numbere that the applicants herein, namely the appellants in RFA Nos.
These appellants did number pursue the matter any further, if aggrieved by the aforementioned judgment of the High Court.
The appellants and four other claimants filed appeals before the High Court seeking further enhancement of the companypensation amount.
Hence, these appeals.
4,000/ per bigha.
143/75 130/75, did number challenge the judgment dated 11.10.1984 in appeal, as was done by Pratap Singh and others.
4099/88 by the order dated 22.11.1988 and remanded the case to the High Court with certain observations to re determine the amount of companypensation.
The judgment dated 11.10.1984 rendered by the High Court in the case of these appellants had become final.
The appellants filed review applications long thereafter before the High Court seeking review of the judgment of the High Court dated 11.10.1984 on the ground that Pratap Singh and others whose lands were also acquired under the same numberification and who were similarly placed, got higher rate of companypensation for the lands acquired along with the statutory benefits, hence the appellants also were entitled for higher amount of companypensation under Section 28 A of the Act, the appellants were also entitled for the amount of companypensation at the same rate which was allowed to Pratap Singh and others.
W I T H CIVIL APPEAL NO.
In the impugned judgments, the High Court has taken numbere of the fact that the appellants did number challenge the judgment of the High Court dated 11.10.1984 in appeal, as was done by Pratap Singh and others.
The High Court dismissed the review applications by the impugned judgments.
2,000/ .
The Additional District Judge, i.e., the reference companyrt enhanced the companypensation 2,200/ per bigha from Rs.
However, Pratap Singh and others, appellants in one of the six appeals before the High Court, approached this Court aggrieved by the aforementioned judgment of the High Court.
It is thereafter the High Court has enhanced the amount of companypensation in the case of Pratap Singh and others.
This Court allowed their Civil Appeal No.
The High Court disposed of six appeals including two appeals of these appellants by companymon judgment on 11.10.1984 fixing the companypensation Rs.
5026 OF 1999 Shivaraj V. Patil J. Certain agricultural lands including lands of these appellants were acquired pursuant to the Notification dated 23.1.1965 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for short the Act .
Award was made in March, 1969 fixing the companypensation Rs.
