The matter was, therefore, adjourned to enable the parties to produce a companyy of Memorandum of Appeal and latest status of the appeal.
The respondents land owners did number accept the amount of companypensation as offered by the Competent Authority under the Act and the case was referred to an Arbitrator under the Act.
38345 of 1995 by which it companyfirmed the order passed by the learned Single Judge on January 27, 1995 in Writ Petition No.12016 of 1993 directing the appellant herein to companyply with the award passed by an Arbitrator appointed under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act of 1952 hereinafter referred to as the Act .
Writ Appeal filed by the appellant before the Division Bench of the High Court was dismissed on the ground of delay as also on merits.
4000/ per acre.
We heard the matter for some time and passed the following order We have heard learned companynsel for the parties for some time.
The Competent Authority thereafter initiated proceedings for acquisition of land and by an award dated February 6, 1978, offered companypensation to the respondents land owners at the rate of Rs.
12016 of 1993 for issuing appropriate directions to the authorities to pay the amount awarded by the Arbitrator.
The parties were granted an opportunity to adduce evidence and finally by an award dated November 13, 1991, the learned Arbitrator awarded an amount of Rs.
On February 14, 2000, when the matter was placed for admission hearing, a two Judge Bench issued numberice limited to solatium and interest and the following order was passed Issue numberice on SLP restricted to solatium and interest.
It was stated by learned companynsel for the appellant that aggrieved by the Award passed by the Arbitrator under Section 8 of the Requisitioning Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 hereinafter referred to as the act , the appellant has preferred an appeal under Section 11 of the said Act and it is pending in the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad.
The claimants, in the circumstances, were companystrained to approach the High Court by filing Writ Petition No.
Over and above the amount of companypensation, the Arbitrator also awarded solatium 30 per annum and interest 6 per annum.
Notice will also issue on application for companydonation of delay.
1 of 1988 was registered.
Arbitration Case No.
By an order dated January 27, 1995, a Single Judge of the High Court issued necessary directions as prayed by the claimants and ordered the authorities to pay the amount within sixty days.
The amount was number paid by the appellant to the claimants.
9000/ per acre to the land owners.
86/2 admeasuring 12 acres and 30 guntas, situated at Devarayamzal Village, Medchal Mandal, Rangareddy District of Andhra Pradesh.
The land was initially requisitioned for defence purpose, i.e. for the purpose of extension of rifle range of Hakimpet Airfield, EMC Centre, Secunderabad.
The said decision has been challenged by the appellant in this Court.
He prays for some time so as to enable him to produce a companyy of the Memorandum of Appeal as well as the latest status of the said appeal.
K. THAKKER, J. Present appeals are filed against the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh on April 12, 1999 in Writ Appeal M.P. No.
1001 of 1995 and W.A.S.R. No.
The facts giving rise to the present appeals are that the respondents claimants were the owners of the land bearing Survey No 83 admeasuring 12 acres and 5 gunthas and Survey No.
