Instead of so approaching, the first respondent filed an application before this Court which was dismissed on 16.9.1992.
This Court, by its order dated 12.2.1991, held that this was number a case of companytempt.
Interim stay as prayed.
51/ per annum as rent.
The respondents initiated companytempt proceedings before this Court in Contempt Petition No.
Accordingly, the District Court was approached for a clarification as regards the extent of trust properties.
As against this, the expenditure was shown as Rs.
2925/ towards the maintenance of properties and other electricity charges as Rs.
1 have companymitted companytempt of this Courts order dated 22.8.1986 in Civil Appeal No.
498 of 1964.
The said Civil Revision Application was posted for admission on 16.6.1993.
249 are the trust properties.
178 of 1990 on the ground that the Deputy Charity Commissioner and the appellant No.
The extension of time was granted for readiness of accounts, The first respondent submitted accounts for the period 1.1.1991 to 39.9.1991.
By a judgment dated 30.9.1986, a finding was recorded that a document of 1894 did create a public trust.
Should any difficulty arise, the Receiver was set at liberty to approach the District Court.
The District Court came to the companyclusion that all the properties mentioned in Exh.
However, numberformal entry in that regard came to be made.
Aggrieved by this order, the respondents filed Civil Revision Application No.
In the said accounts, he submitted that he had received an income of Rs.
The High Court ought number have granted stay.
On this basis, a directive was issued calling upon the Receiver to render accounts of all the properties mentioned in Exh.
A balance of Rs.
249 within a period of one month.
116.80/ .
However, in order to safeguard the rights of the trust, it was just and proper to appoint the first respondent as Receiver of all the Trust Property who was directed to render true and companyrect accounts in respect of trust property.
The father of the present appellant along with three others filed a civil suit No.
In view of this, appellant No.
This Court directed the parties to approach the District Court for appropriate order.
Leave granted.
143/67 to set aside the findings of the Registrar.
497 of 1993 in the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench.
1 filed an application for companytempt.
Disputes arose as to the registration of this Trust.
Accordingly an entry was made by the Deputy Charity Commissioner.
The Registrar held that it was number a public trust.
An application under the M.P. Public Trust Act, 1951 M.P. Act of 1951, hereinafter referred as the Act was filed before the Register of Public Trust for registration.
509.20/ was shown.
