After his reinstatement, departmental proceedings were initiated.
The respondent was found guilty.
So far as payment of salary, allowances etc.
The respondent was placed under suspension from 15.06.1988 till he was reinstated on 04.05.1993.
But in writ appeal No.884 of 1998, a Division Bench directed dismissal of the writ petition.
5826 OF 2007 Arising out of S.L.P. C No.23654 of 2004 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
are companycerned, relevant portion of the order read as follows In the light of the above punishment the undersigned further directs that Sri M. Venu Ranganath will number be entitled to any salary and allowances and other attendant benefits including increment for the period spent by him under suspension, save and except the Subsistence Allowance already paid to him during the said period.
The same were questioned by a writ petition being writ Petition No.15797 of 1994 which was allowed by learned Single Judge.
The departmental enquiry was companycluded on 29.02.2003.
The respondent filed writ petition being Writ Petition No.11615 of 1994 claiming pay and allowances for the period of suspension which was dismissed by a learned Single Judge.
Challenge in this appeal is to the Judgment of a Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court allowing the writ appeal filed by the respondent.
Respondent filed Writ Appeal No.685 of 2004 which was allowed by the impugned order.
CIVIL APPEAL NO.
It was inter alia held by the Division Bench that C1ause 22 of the applicable Manual i.e. A Manual on Disciplinary Action and Related Matters of UCO Bank governed the case and number Regulation 15 2 of the United Commercial Bank Conduct and Discipline and Appeal Regulation, 1976.
Both the accused persons were tried in the Court of Special Judge for CBI cases.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows The respondent, who, at the relevant point of time was Branch Manager of appellant No.l Bank and was posted at Nellore in Andhra Pradesh was charged and tried along with one Shrinivasulu s o Chenchuramaiah for offences punishable under Sections 120 B, 471 and 477 of Indian Penal Code 1860 in short the the IPC and Section 5 2 read with Section 5 1 d of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 in short the Prevention of Corruption Act .
