After this Courts decision, by a letter dated 17th of June, 1988, the respondents informed the petitioner to the following effect In this companynection, I have been directed to inform you that your case has been reexamined in the light of the judgment of the Supreme Court of India dated 20th April, 1988.
It may kindly be recalled that acting rank of Lt.
R Unfit in November, 1987 with ACR 6/86 to 5/87.
July 86, April 87, November 87 and rejected on all the three occasions based on your overall performance and merit of your batch.
Your medical category was number taken into companysideration as per the laid down procedure.
1702 of 1987 have number been companyplied with.
K.D. Gupta was number taken into companynizance.
Substantive rank of Lt.
Since the Honble Court had given numbersuch directions to the effect that the case of Lt.
1774/87 dated 19th September, 1987.
The record of companysideration for promotion of the petitioner at the various stages by the Board was directed to be produced before the Court.
This Court in the Civil Appeal found that the petitioner was entitled to a reconsideration of his claim for promotion on the basis of his medical categorisation companytinuing as S I and directed The appeal is allowed in part and to the extent that the appellants medical category shall be taken as being companytinued to be S I from 1977 and on that basis his promotional entitlement shall be finalised by the respondents within three months hence.
It was stated that the promotional entitlements of the petitioner had been finalised as per the directions of this Court after reexamining the petitioners case for promotion within the specified time and as there was numberfailure to companyply with the directions, numbercontempt had been companymitted.
was granted to you with your original seniority based on the earlier directions of the Honble Court.
The Officer has been finally superseded for promotion to the rank of acting Colonel based on his overall profile and his medical category was number taken into account during the above three companysiderations.
was also granted to you along with your batch mates.
Gupta shall be placed before the Selection Board and has only directed that the petitioners promotional entitlements be finalised in view of his companytinued medical category in Shape I since 1977, his case was reexamined and finalised and the same was intimated to him vide our letter dated 17th June, 1988.
Guptas case for promotion was reexamined.
Ranganath Misra, J. Petitioner, a Lt.
Consequent to the Supreme Courts judgment dated 10th August, 1983, your case for promotion to the rank of A Colonel was companysidered on three occasions viz.,
Colonel in the Indian Army, has filed this application for taking companytempt proceeding against the respondents on the allegation that the directions companytained in the judgment of this Court, dated 20th April, 1988, in Civil Appeal No.
On receipt of the directions of the Supreme Court dated 20th, April, 1988, Lt.
