Even if we want to examine the companyrectness of the facts found by the trial companyrt as well as the appellate companyrt the High Court refused to reappreciate the evidence we are number in a position to do so because all the relevant documents are number before us.
In arriving at the companyclusion that there is numberreliable evidence to show that the husband or his parents had ill treated the appellant, the trial companyrt as well as the appellate companyrt have relied on a number of letters exchanged between the parties.
After exchange of certain letters the husband filed the suit from which this appeal arises for restitution of companyjugal rights, on November 3, 1965.
This is a wifes appeal, by special leave against the order directing restitution of companyjugal rights.
The companyrts below have companye to the companyclusion that the appellant deserted the matrimonial home on January 13, 1962.
The parties were married on July 15, 1961.
Gona ceremony took place on December 10, 1961.
For one reason or the other, they have number been printed.
Some of them have number been printed.
