This document is number a registered document and the trial companyrt admitted it in evidence in proof of adoption.
This document, in addition to recital of the factum of adoption in presence of Panchayat in accordance with the custom of the Community also companytained a companyenant wherein she had stated that after this deed of adoption her adopted son will be entitled Hakdar to the whole property including movable and immova ble and she will have numberright to alienate any part of the property after this deed of adoption.
The first appellate companyrt dismissed the suit setting aside the decree passed by the trial companyrt.
Against this, by Special leave, this appeal has companye to this Court.
The trial companyrt decreed the suit.
From the Judgment and Order dated 1.2.1971 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur in S.A. 517 of 1969.
The property originally belonged to her husband and after his death she got it as a limited owner and by influx of time and by companying into force of the Hindu Succession Act, she acquired the rights of an absolute owner.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
On 28.4.63, she adopted respondent Nain Singh as her son and executed a document said to be the Deed of Adoption.
2116 of 1972.
P. Singh for the Appellants.
The Order of the Court was delivered by OZA, J. This appeal arises out of the Judgment dated 1.2.1971 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Second Appeal No.
5 17/69, wherein the learned Judge of the High Court dismissed the Second Appeal filed by the present appellant.
The present appellant filed a suit for injunction and possession on the basis of a registered sale deed dated 28.4.66 executed by Smt.
Uday U. Lalit and A.G. Ratnaparkhi for the Respondents.
Yashoda Bai in his favour with respect to immovable property including agricultural lands and houses.
