During the pendency of appeal in this Court one of the plaintiffs who was a joint decree holder, as mentioned earlier, died some time in 1968, but the appellant failed to bring her legal representatives on record.
The High Court reversed the decree of the first appellate companyrt and restored that of the trial companyrt.
A joint decree in their favour was passed by the trial companyrt.
The first appellate companyrt reversed the decree of the trial companyrt and dismissed the suit.
The two respondents as joint plaintiffs filed a suit for possession of the suit property.
Their suit was decreed as prayed for.
1 he appellant appealed against the decree.
The two plaintiffs went up in appeal to the High Court.
Thereafter the appellant brought this appeal by special leave.
This appeal abates.
The material facts are these.
