In the meantime, his promotional appointment as Commandant was extended from time to time.
The respondent was asked to opt for absorption.
145 of 1979.
From the Judgment and Order dated 19.7.78 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Writ Petition Appeal No.
A representation of the respondent was rejected by the President.
In October 1970, the President sanctioned his companytinued re employment for one year as Commandant.
Subba Rao, P. Parmeshwaran and Ms. S. Relan for the Appellants.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
In June 1976, he was informed by the Director General of the C.R.P.F. that in view of the Rule 107 of the Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955, he was number enti tled for absorption in the Force.
Ram Kumar for the Respondent.
Early in 1970 he was promoted on temporary basis as Commandant on the basis of selection.
137/1978.
Thereupon, he applied to the Andhra Pradesh High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution for a direction for his absorption in the Force.
The respondent on taking premature retirement on companypas sionate ground from the Indian Army at the age of 33, was offered appointment as Assistant Commandant in the Central Reserve Police Force CRPF for short and was given appoint ment initially for a period of three years.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RANGANATH MISRA, J. This appeal by special leave is against the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in a writ appeal agrising out of the judgment of a learned Single Judge in an application under Article 226 of the Constitu tion.
