The appellant and the other accused were, therefore, tried for offence under Section 3 and Section 5 of the Terrorists and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act, 1987 hereinafter referred to as TADA and also under Section 25 1 b a of the Arms Act.
The companyviction and sentence passed against the appellant by the learned Designated Court, Valsad at Navsari by the judgment dated 22 12 1989 in Sessions Case No.
When the owner of the house and other villagers were in search of the miscreants responsible for such theft, they spotted five persons present near a tea stall and they suspected their involvement in the case of theft.
The matter was reported to the local police and on being searched from the possession of one of the persons, two sarees alleged to be stolen and a companyntry made pistol and some live cartridges were recovered.
79 of 1988 are impugned in this appeal.
The prosecution case in short is that a theft had taken place in Village Kakaduva on 13 6 1988.
