3, Gwalior.
The Labour Court does number appear to have taken into companysideration the pleas raised by the appellant herein that the production division at Guna was wound up by an order dated 3.7.1992 of the State of Madhya Pradesh, even while companysidering the relief which was required to be given in the facts and circumstances of the case.
The appellants companytend that the respondent was engaged in the production division of Forest Department of District Guna which has since been wound up.
His services were thereafter terminated.
Admittedly, numberoffer of appointment was issued to him number the recruitment rules applicable for filling up of a permanent or temporary post have been followed.
Arising out of SLP C No.
Contending, inter alia, that he had worked in different departments of the State from August, 1984 to July 8, 1992, his services were terminated without companyplying with the requirements of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, a companyplaint petition was filed by the respondent before the Presiding Officer, Labour Court No.
By reason of an award dated 12.7.1999 on a finding that the Respondent had worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year and having regard to the fact that numberretrenchment companypensation was paid, he was directed to be reinstated in service with full back wages.
2567 of 2005 B. SINHA, J Leave granted.
The respondent was appointed as a Chowkidar by the appellants.
