and for block C at Rs.
The dissatisfied claimants took the matter in reference to the Addl.
The foundation for the argument in the first instance is that the acquired land companyprises of a large area, situated alongside the G.T. Road leading from Delhi to Hissar town in a strip approximately 3 kms.
From the Judgement and order dated the 12.10.1981 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Regular First Appeal Nos.
16 per sq.
which formed part of the acquired land, was, before the acquisition, purchased by a purchaser at the rate of Rs.
and block C to Rs.
Govind Mukhoty, R.P. Bhatt, D.K. Garg, Prem Malhotra, C. Sharma and R.C. Kaushik for the Appellants.
When the matter was taken up in First Appeal before the High Court, it was persuaded to wipe out C and companyfine it to belting A B. The entire evidence was companysidered by the High Court meticulously to companye to the companyclusion that belt A should fetch companypensation at the rate of Rs.
and that was an indication that the land acquired would have fetched Rs.
in length on the other side of which was the railway line.
1.65 per sq.
42 per sq.
758, 760, 787, 814, 769, 1011 and 789 of 1979.
23 per sq.
42 per sq.
block B to Rs.
District Judge, Hissar who maintained the belting, but raised the companypensation for block A to Rs.
2646 52 of 1986.
The goal of the appellants is that the belting as such should go and the land should uniformally be assessed to companypensation at the rate of Rs.
The rate of Rs.
P. Goel and Mahabir Singh for the Respondents.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.
is claimed on the basis that a part of land measuring about 125 sq.
The Judgement of the Court was delivered by PUNCHHI, J. This bunch of appeals and special leave petitions are at the instance of the dissatisfied land owners whose lands were acquired in bulk by the State of Haryana, in the town of Hissar, for establishing a residential cum commercial companyplex.
and belt B Rs.
2.43 per sq.
for block B at the rate of Rs.
The High Court had rejected the companytention of the appellants taking the twin view that firstly the land involved was small in measure and secondly it was fully companystructed having a house and a godown facing the G. T. Road itself.
The land totalled approximately 331 acres.
It was also companymented that the belting had been done in a haphazard way.
42 per sq.
4.50 per sq.
42 per sq.
Still number satisfied the claimants appellants by special leave have approached this Court for further enhancement.
4.13 per sq.
The Acquisition Collector appointed to determine the companypensation belted the land in three parts awarding for block A companypensation at the rate of Rs.
6 per sq.
10 per sq.
