The District Magistrate duly reported to the State Government the fact of having made the order together with the grounds of detention and all other particulars having a bearing on the matter.
Thus you acted in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order.
As a result of your action panic prevailed in the area which was prejudicial to the maintenance of public order.
trespassed into Shalimar Yard by scaling over the boundary wall and started looting railway materials stacked in front of D. S. P. Store, Shalimar.
you and your associates being armed with iron rods, daggers, bombs etc.,
The order of detention as also the grounds of detention with a translation thereof in Indian language, were duly served on the petitioner on the day of his arrest.
On July 5, 1972 the State Government placed the petitioners case before the Advisory Board as required by Section 10 of the Act.
When resisted by the on duty R. P. F. Rak shaks, you and your associates attacked them by throwing ballasts and hur ling bombs with a view to scare them away by terrorising them.
you and your associates being armed with daggers, iron rods, bombs etc.,
Shri V. C. Parashar, learned Counsel appearing as amicus curiae to assist this Court, submitted in the first instance that the gap of about 10 months between the order of detention and the arrest suggests that there was numberreal and genuine apprehension that the petitioner was likely to act in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order.
The grounds on which the detention was ordered read On 20 4 71 at 02.00 hrs.
When resisted by the on duty R.P.F. Rakshak, you and your associates attacked him by throwing ballasts and hurling bombs at him with a view to scare him away and thus escaped with the looted railway property by terrorising him.
The petitioner companyld, however, be arrested only on June 16, 1972 as, according to the return soon after the said order the detenu petitioner was found to be absconding.
On August 26, 1972 the State Government companyfirmed the detention order as required by Section 12 1 of the Act and duly companymunicated its decision to the petitioner.
When resisted by the on duty R.P.F. Rakshaks, you and your associates attacked them and hurled bombs at them with a view to scare them away and escaped with the stolen property by terrorising them.
and rushed towards the loaded wagons stabled on Shalimar Ramkrishnapore side line with a view to loot companymodities by breaking open wagons.
As a result of your action panic prevailed in the area which was prejudicial to the maintenance of public order.
On June 29, 1972 the State Government received a representation from the petitioner which was companysidered and rejected on July 3, 1972.
On 22 7 71 at 02.30 hrs.
On 21 6 71 at 03.30 hrs.
trespassed into Shalimar yard and companymitted theft of 7 bundles of Tarpauline valued Rupees 700/ from delivery shed.
you and your associates being armed with daggers, bombs etc.,
Maintenance of Internal Security ACT, 26 of 1971 hereinafter called the Act .
D. Dua, J. The petitioner in this case is being detained in Dum Dum Central Jail, pursuant to an order of detention dated August 18, 1971 made by the District Magistrate, Howrah in exercise of the powers companyferred on him by Section 3 1 and 2 of the.
