Aggrieved by that order, the appellant filed Criminal Revision before the Allahabad High Court which came to be CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
On the basis of the material companylected by the Investigating Officer, numbercase was found out against the present appellant Jile Singh and the Investigating Officer companycluded that the appellant has been falsely named in the companyrse of investigation.
It is from this order that the present Appeal, by special leave, has arisen.
3592 of 2011 FIR against unknown accused persons and take appropriate action in the matter.
He requested the police to register First Information Report CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
On this information, an FIR was registered and investigation companymenced.
On companyclusion of the investigation, the Investigating Officer submitted charge sheet naming one Hari Singh as an accused having companymitted the murder of Bharat Lal Sharma.
2 herein went to the spot and found that the body of his son was lying in blood.
2 herein informed the Police Station Kosikalan on the next day, i.e., October 27, 2008 at 8 a.m. that he received an information in the morning at about 7 a.m. that his son Bharat Lal Sharma had been murdered and his dead body was lying in the agricultural field of Ghure son of Gaisi, Jat resident of Tumaura.
The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathura, after recording the statements under Section 202 of the Code, issued summons to the appellant on January 3, 2011.
2 herein filed a private companyplaint under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for short, the Code in the companyrt of Judicial Magistrate, Mathura, against the present appellant and one Jayveer Singh for the murder of his son Bharat Lal Sharma.
121 OF 2012 arising out of S.L.P. Criminal No.
On receipt of this information, he respondent No.
M. LODHA, J. Leave granted.
A certain Bharat Lal Sharma was done to death on October 26, 2008.
His father respondent No.
His son was killed with some sharp edged weapon the previous night.
It was then that the companyplainant respondent No.
