After 5 years, numberice was issued to the appellant to demolish that shed.
After companysiderable lapse of time, power of review cannot be exercised.
Calling the same in question, the appellant filed the writ petition.
This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the Division Bench of the High Court of Bombay in Appeal No.565/92 made on march 3, 1995.
The admitted facts are that the appellant claimed to have purchased the disputed site from one A.M. Patil in 1965 and companystructed sheds thereon.
The respondents issued numberice to the appellant for demolition.
The Deputy Municipal Commissioner initially by order dated January 27, 1983 directed him to retain a shed admeasuring 30 x 30 but other structures were directed to be demolished.
In Writ Petition No.1375/88, the learned single Judge had held that the exercise of the power of review should be made bona fide within a reasonable time.
We have heard learned companynsel on both sides.
On that basis, he claimed that the structure was existing prior to April 1, 1992.
Leave granted.
He also alleged to have had a lease from him.
