14 of 2008.
5928 of 2010 before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in short the Code to quash the criminal proceedings against them.
Though all of them belong to Congress Party, Respondent No.
7,00,000/ to purchase a vehicle and also gave separate amount for hiring goondas.
When the case was pending for trial, Respondent Nos.
Further, A 3 was entrusted with the responsibility of giving information about the movements of the appellant.
1 3 and Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, learned companynsel for Respondent No.4 State.
Brief facts The appellant, who was a defacto companyplainant and Respondent Nos.
1 3 herein and quashed the criminal proceedings pending against them.
Respondent No.
In the year 2006, the appellant companytested Zila Parishad Territorial Constituency Elections as an independent candidate and won it.
The Magistrate companymitted the case to the Ist Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Rajahmundry for trial and the same was taken on file in Sessions Case No.
In the meanwhile, A 5 and A 6 also came there on Bajaj Boxer Motorcycle belonging to A 2 where A 4 and A 12 broke the windowpanes of the car while A 5 sprinkled chilly powder into the eyes of the appellant and attacked him with rods and sticks and caused injuries on his vital parts of the body which resulted in bleeding.
5928 of 2010 wherein the High Court allowed the criminal petition filed by Respondent Nos.
1 3 herein A 1 to A 3 .
After companypletion of investigation, the S.I. filed charge sheet against A 1 to A 12 on 30.08.2008 for the offences punishable under Sections 120 B, 147, 148, 427, 307, 201 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code in short the IPC before the Court of IInd Additional Judicial Magistrate First Class, Rajahmundry and the same was taken on file in PRC No.
The learned single Judge of the High Court, by impugned judgment dated 28.10.2010, allowed the petition and quashed the criminal proceedings against Respondent Nos.
2, Karri Venkata Mukunda Reddy A 2 developed ill will against the appellant and were jealous of his gaining popularity within the party as well as in their area and neighbourhood.
A 1 and A 2 developed grudge against the appellant and they companytracted Valmiki Gujjula Ramayya Kondayya A 4 who belongs to Emmiganur Mandal of Kurnool District for killing the appellant and gave him Rs.
A 4 hired A 5 to A 12 for the said purpose and they companyspired together and hatched a plan to assault the appellant.
In pursuance of their companyspiracy, on 07.11.2007 between 700 p.m. to 730 p.m. when the appellant was proceeding in his Honda City car along with his wife and children to attend a function near J.K. Gardens, A 4, A 7 to A 12 who were in a Scorpio Car came across his car.
1 3 accused persons are the residents of Komaripalem village of East Godavari District.
Heard Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, learned companynsel for the appellant and Mr. Altaf Ahmed, learned senior companynsel for Respondent Nos.
This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 28.10.2010 of the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Criminal Petition No.
Somehow the appellant managed to escape from the place of incident and went to the house of Jakkampudi Raja Indra Vandir L.W. 6 , who admitted him in the hospital and informed the incident to the SHO, I Town LO , Police Station, Rajahmundry.
3, Mallidi Chinna Veera Venkata Satyanarayana A 3 , was initially an associate of the appellant herein but later joined hands with A 1 and A 2.
Sathasivam, J. Leave granted.
1, Kovvuri Satyanarayana Reddy A 1 and Respondent No.
175 of 2010.
Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant complainant has filed this appeal by way of special leave petition before this Court.
Thereafter, A 4 to A 12 left the spot.
1 3 herein preferred Criminal Petition No.
