Accordingly the respondent was reinstated.
The respondent thereafter was transferred to Madras Airport and the enquiry proceedings were dropped.
P.C. The respondent herein Shri C.L. Subramaniam, who was a subordinate to the appellants, was companymon respondent in both those Cr.
M.Ps filed by the Customs Officers under Section 482 Cr.
under Section 482 Cr.
Again the respondent was charge sheeted for lack of integrity and misconduct and he filed a writ petition questioning the same which was dismissed and therefore a writ appeal was filed by him and an agreement was reached between the Department and the officer companycerned.
P.C. before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam for offence punishable under Sections 500 read with 34 I.P.C. alleging that in the said companynter affidavit, the appellants have made defamatory statements.
The Chief Judicial Magistrate took companynizance of the offence companyplained of and issued process and summoned the appellants to face the trial.
Jayachandra Reddy, J. These two appeals arise out of the same order of the High Court of Kerala dismissing two Cr.
The appellants filed two Cr.
before the High Court.
Shri C.L. Subramaniam, the respondent herein filed two companyplaints under Section 200 Cr.
Hence the present appeals.
