filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment of the learned single Judge.
1979 issued under Section 68 C of the old Act had lapsed on account of delay in finalisation of the same.
1989 and the old Act was repealed.
3 165 of 1991.
1988 hereinafter referred to as the new Act was enforced with effect from 1.7.
The hearing authority after companysidering those objections approved the scheme under Section 68 D 2 of the old Act by its order dated 30.11.
Meanwhile, the Motor Vehicles Act.
Before the State Government companyld issue Notifica tion under Section 68 1 3 of the old Act, the appellant and other affected operators made representation to the Minister for Transport for affording them a fresh opportuni ty of hearing.
as well as the various writ petitions including that of the appellant by a companymon order dated 9.8.
From the Judgment and Order dated 9.8.90 of the Rajas than High Court in W.P. No.
The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur issued a Notification on 11.10.
A Division Bench of the High Court disposed of the Letters Patent Appeal of Sardar Mohd.
on similar grounds.
1984 and submitted the papers to the State Government for the issue of Notification under Section 68 D 3 .
The appellant thereupon filed a writ petition before the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of Mandamus restraining the State Government from issuing the final Notification, mainly on the ground that on the enforcement of the new Act, the Notification dated 11.
The existing operators as well as the affected opera tors of the route filed their objections before the hearing authority appointed by the State Government of Rajasthan.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
A similar writ petition had been filed earlier in respect of Kishangarh Sarwad route by one Sardar Mohd.
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Rajasthan dated 9.8.
1979 proposing a scheme under Section 68 C of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 hereinafter referred to as the old Act for the exclusive operation of the vehicles of the State Road Transport Corporation on the Kota Sangod route.
A. Bobde, and Mrs. Rani Chhabra for the Appellant.
The appellant holds a Stage Carriage Permit for plying his vehicle on the Kota Khanpur route, which overlaps a portion of the KotaSangod route.
1990 dismissing the appellants writ petition made under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the scheme for nationalisation of the route in dispute.
Jain and Mrs. Pratibha Jain for the Respondents.
Sardar Mohd.
Satish Kr.
1990 impugned in the present appeal.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SINGH, J. Special leave granted.
2009/90.
