Thereafter his services as such came to be regularised on the basis of the recommendation of the Public Service Commission as per Government Order No.
It was urged in the writ petition that promotions granted to various other persons were arbitrary and he had been denied such a promotion despite having requisite experience.
On 13 9 1993, the appellant was personally present in the companyrt.
When the companytemp proceedings came up for hearing on 1 9 1993, the learned Judge passed are order directing issue of number bailable warrants and framed rule in the said companytempt petition.
I also passed an interim order directing the State Government and the appellant herein to grant ad hoc promotion to the respondent to the post of Associate Professor.
The learned Judge also directed the Government Advocate Additional Advocate General, representing the appellant, should number appear on behalf of the appellant in the said companytempt petition to defend him and on the companytrary should assist the companyrt.
The companytempt proceedings were adjourned to 27 9 1993 and it was directed that the appellant be present in the companyrt on the said date.
In March 1993 for number implementing this order companytempt proceedings were initiated by the respondent.
The appellant filed his companynter in the companytempt proceedings.
He filed Writ Petition No.
The said period was treated as on deputation without pay and allowances.
The respondent was companyfirmed on the post of Assistant Professor with retrospective effect from 25 1 1987.
The further companytention was that it was wrong on the part of the Government in number companynting period of foreign assignment as against his teaching experience.
By Government Order No.
The learned Judge declined to accept the unqualified apology tendered by the appellant till the order dated 21 9 1992 was implemented and the appellant purged himself of companytempt.
Aggrieved by this order, SLP No.
197 ME of 1981.
It was directed that he will be entitled to companynt the said deputation towards increments and other service benefits.
He was in Saudi Arabia for a period of 2 years and 10 months.
On 8 3 1993 the High Court issued numberice on the companytempt petition and called upon the appellant to implement the order dated 21 9 1992.
2452 of 1992 before the High Court of Jammu Kashmir at Srinagar inter alia seeking ad hoc promotion to the post of Associate Professor with effect from 14 3 1989.
It was made clear that this period of deputation on foreign assignment companyld number be companynted as against teaching experience.
On 21 9 1992, the High Court issued numberice on the writ petition.
The short facts are as under.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MOHAN, J. Special leave granted in both SLPS.
304 HME dated 7 4 1989.
134 HME dated 25 2 1986, he was, promoted as Assistant Professor on ad hoc basis.
Besides, a detailed companynter was also filed in the writ petition in which it was stated that the claim of the respondent for promotion was misconceived since such a promotion to the post of Associate Professor under the relevant rule was required to be made by the Public Service Commission or by Departmental Promotion Committee.
He took up foreign assignment with Subya General Hospital at Saudi Arabia.
15573 of 1993 has companye to be preferred.
Against the order dated 1 9 1993 referred to above, SLP No.
The respondent was appointed as Lecturer in the Faculty of Medicine, Medical College, Srinagar, under Order No.
