Hence they are omitted.
Consequently, the respondent filed a writ petition in the High Court which was allowed directing the appellant to allot the site to the respondent.
Default was companymitted in payment of the instalments.
Thus this appeal by special leave.
The admitted facts are that the site bearing No.
The allotment came to be made in the year 1965 at a companycessional rate of Rs.10/ per sq.yd.
Thus the entitlement to the allotment became final and the companytroversy became quiteous.
On with penal amounts prescribed under the Rules the property was handed over again to the respondent.
Thereafter, since it was number companystructed, the property was again resumed in the year 1981.
2677/93, dated November 4, 1993.
The respondent filed the writ petition, which was dismissed.
This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Writ Petition No.
187 B, Industrial area, Chandigarh was alloted to his.
The other clauses are number relevant for the purpose of this case including the proviso which bears relevance provided sub clause l of Rule 11 D is satisfied.
LPA was also dismissed and when the SLP was filed, this Court companyfirmed the order of dismissal.
Consequently, the site was resumed on April 26, 1967.
Subsequently, the respondent filed an application under Rule 11 D of the Chandigarh Sale of Sites and Building Rules 1960 For short, the Rules .
The allottee was Kulraj Singh Paul, S o Sardar Gurbax Singh.
Leave granted.
The Estate Officer is number obliged to order retransfer to the allottee Kulraj Singh Paul.
Johnson Paints Varnish Co. For industrial use.
The Estate Officer had refused to make retransfer of allotment and the petition was rejected.
