anti dev singh learned companynsel appearing on behalf of the respondents frankly companyceded that the peti tioner companyld number be said to have retired on december 31 1985.
but nevertheless it has to be said that the petitioner had retired on january 1 1986 and number on december 31 1985.
it is clear from the order extracted above that the petitioner was permitted to retire voluntarily from the service of the registry of the supreme companyrt with effect from the forenumbern of january 1 1986.
he however sought for voluntary retirement from the service of this companyrt and on his application in that regard the following order dated december 6 1985 was companymunicated to him by the registrar of this companyrt office order the honble the chief justice of india has accepted the numberice of shri s. banerjee offg.
original jurisdiction writ petition civil number 1155 of 1987.
mishra and ms.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by dutt j. the petitioner was the additional registrar of this companyrt.
anil dev singh r. venkataramani r.b.
his numbermal date of retirement was march 31 1987.
lalitha kaushik for the petitioner.
under article 32 of the companystitution of india .
p. malik and mrs.
subhashini for the respondents.
it is also number the case of the respondents that the petitioner had retired from the service of this companyrt on december 31 1985.
additional registrar perma nent deputy registrar seeking voluntary retirement from service under the provisions of rule 48a of the central civil services pension rules 1972 and has permitted him to retire voluntarily from the service of the registry of the supreme companyrt of india with effect from the forenumbern of january 1 1986.
