Out of the 11 units which had become sick, nine companyld number be revived and only two companyld be revived.
The decision in M s L.M.L. case supra has numberapplication because the decision in that case related to surcharge on energy charges.
It is to be numbered that the High Court has number discussed as to why and in what manner Lord Krishna Mills case was distinguishable on facts.
Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court.
To ensure to supply the electricity as required companytinuously, regularly during the period of rehabilitation.
5275 OF 2007 Arising out of S.L.P. C No.
CIVIL APPEAL NO.
Background facts as projected by the appellant are as follows The appellant unit was involved in the manufacture of Cotton yarn.
The appellant referred the matter of sickness of the mill to the BIFR under the Sick Industrial Companies Special Provisions Act, 1985 in short SICA .
20610 of 2006 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
The production in the unit stopped in the year 1992.
The appellant a unit of National Textile Corporation U.P. Limited in short NTC had moved the High Court for quashing the recovery proceedings.
Further prayer was for direction to the respondents number to demand and or recover any amount from the appellant.
