2,000/ per month for the first year Rs.
The appeal having been dismissed, the recent civil appeal has been filed in this Court on special leave having been granted.
2,500/ per month for the second year and Rs.
It was clearly stipulated in the offer that was given to each one of them that they will be entitled to stipend Rs.
Mr. Sita Rama Rao, the learned Counsel appearing for the appellants vehemently companytended that the so called stipend fixed for different years, on the face of it, arbitrary more particularly when the said stipend was fixed in the year 1989 and there had been numberenhancement of the same in the year 1992 on which year these appellants were recruited as officers under training.
It was further companytended that the Corporation should have done well in applying the Government Order issued by the State Government in exercise of its power under Article 162 of the Constitution inasmuch as all employees of the Andhra Pradesh Government should have been equally treated and there should be numberreason as to why the Corporation should number be companypelled to apply the aforesaid Government Order.
2,700/ per month for the third year.
They were further required to execute a bond agreeing to undergo the training for a period of three years and received the stipend as referred to earlier.
The writ petitions having been thus partly allowed, as stated above an appeal was carried to the Division Bench.
The appellants who were the writ petitioners before the High Court had been recruited as officers under training, having been selected pursuant to an advertisement issued by the Corporation.
B. Pattanaik, J. This civil appeal is directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court which has affirmed the judgment of the learned Single Judge of the High Court.
