3647 of 2009 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh praying for quashing and setting aside the order dated 04.07.2009 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Class I, Korba and the proceedings drawn by the Magistrate on the companyplaint of SEPCO.
In the said petition, State of Andhra Pradesh and State of Chhattisgarh were arrayed as parties and represented through their Public Prosecutors.
Mr. Srinivas Gundluri, Managing Director Principal Officer, SSVG also received a memo from Police Station, Balco Nagar, for recording his statement.
P.C. According to this companyplaint, a prayer has been made to take companynizance against Accused Mr. Srinivas Gundluri and Smt.
The companytract value of the work was Rs.
On 26.04.2010, Srinivas Gundluri filed a petition before the High companyrt of Andhra Pradesh, under Section 397 read with Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code challenging the order dated 22.04.2010 passed by the CMM, Hyderabad.
In this background, the Managing Director and Principal Officer, Director and Promoter as well as the Company SSVG Engineering Projects Pvt.
The facts leading to the filing of these two appeals are M s SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation in short SEPCO was engaged in erection of power plant at village Nariyara in Akaltara District Janjgir Champa.
Aggrieved by the said order, SEPCO filed appeal S.L.P. Crl.
Complaint under Section 200 Cr.
On 19.04.2010, Srinivas Gundluri moved an application before the CMM, Hyderabad, for extension of the period of transit bail on the ground of his illness and of his wife and another application before the Judicial Magistrate Ist class, Korba, Chhattisgarh seeking extension of time on the ground that the S.L.P. filed against the order of the writ appeal is listed before this Court on 20.04.2010 and as such, the time to surrender be extended by a week.
5095 of 2010 is preferred against the interim order dated 27.04.2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Crl.
P.C. has been filed against Respondents accused praying for taking companynizance against them under Sections 405, 406, 418, 420, 427, 503, 504, 506/34 and 120B of Indian Penal Code.
On 22.04.2010, when the matter was taken up for hearing before CMM, Hyderabad, numbere appeared for Srinivas Gundluri, therefore, the Magistrate took companynizance of such fact and in view of the fraud played upon the companyrt rejected the application for extension of time and issued number bailable warrant against him for his arrest and production before the JMFC Korba, Chhattisgarh.
The Chief Judicial Magistrate, by his order dated 04.07.2009, allowed the application of SEPCO filed under Section 156 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure hereinafter referred to as the Code and forwarded the original companyplaint along with documents to the companycerned Station House Officer SHO directing him to register FIR, after due enquiry, and to submit a chargesheet after investigation.
42,92,19,800/ and the work was to be companypleted within a period of two months.
As per the terms, 50 of the value of the companytract was to be paid in advance.
General Manager, SEPCO companyplaining that despite repeated requests, SEPCO has number handed over the site for companymencing the work and requested to hand over the site so as to enable it to companyplete the work within two months.
3267 of 2010 as per the terms and companyditions of the companytract settled between SEPCO and SSVG.
3 crores and this Court granted an order of interim protection of stay of arrest till 14.05.2010.
Ltd. filed Writ Petition No.
Against the decision of the Division Bench, SSVG preferred appeal arising out of SLP Crl.
On 03.07.2009, SSVG received a letter from the Union Bank of India whereby it was apprised that the Bank has received a letter on 02.07.2009 from the Police Station Balco Nagar requesting to freeze their current account with immediate effect on the companyplaint of SEPCO.
Before this Court, on 26.04.2010, companynsel for the appellant herein offered to pay a sum of Rs.
3267 of 2010 before this Court.
20,97,46,840/ towards payment of 50 advance was issued to SSVG on 25.06.2009.
SSVG wrote a letter on 28.06.2009 to the Dy.
Complainant present along with his companynsel Shri B.K. Shukla, Advocate.
SSVG was required to go ahead with the project work immediately.
272 of 2009 and produced him for transit warrant before CMM at Hyderabad and on the same day he applied for transit bail and the same was granted directing him to appear before Magistrate Class I, Korba on or before 19.04.2010.
However, SEPCO vide letter dated 29.06.2009 cancelled the work order dated 16.06.2009 on the ground that the companypany has failed to mobilize requisite manpower, machinery and equipment by that date but diverted the amount for some other purpose than the one as agreed, hence demanded refund of advance money.
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh, on 27.04.2010, passed an interim order staying the order dated 22.04.2010 passed by the CMM Hyderabad.
The work order was issued by SEPCO on 16.06.2009.
3267 of 2010 is directed against the final judgment dated 01.04.2010 passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in W.A. No.
Bharati Devi, Director and others under Sections 405, 406, 418, 420, 427, 503, 504, 506/34 and 120B of Indian Penal Code.
A cheque for a sum of Rs.
The appeal arising out of S.L.P. Crl.
5 crores to SEPCO of which 2 crores to be paid within two days and sought four weeks time to pay another Rs.
Subsequently, SSVG came to know that on 04.07.2009, SEPCO has filed a criminal companyplaint against them in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Class I Korba.
Sathasivam, J. Leave granted.
281 of 2009 whereby the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants herein and the appeal arising out of S.L.P. Crl.
On 09.04.2010, Chhatisgrarh Police had taken Srinivas Gundluri, Managing Director and Principal Officer of SSVG into custody in Crime No.
They also prayed for issuance of writ of prohibition in order to prohibit further proceedings pending in the Court of Magistrate, Class I, Korba in companynection with the companyplaint lodged by SEPCO and quashing the companymunication dated 03.07.2009 by the bank relating to freezing of the SSVGs account.
893 of 2010 staying the order dated 22.04.2010 passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad rejecting the application for extension of transit bail and also recording of the fact that fraud has been played upon the Court and resultantly, number bailable warrant was issued against respondent No.1 in this appeal for his arrest and production before JMFC, Korba, Chhattisgrarh.
SEPCO awarded companystructional work to M s SSVG Engineering Projects Private Limited in short SSVG the appellants in appeal arising out of SLP Crl.
