The award was made under Section 11 on March 24,l978.
According to him, he disposed them of in routine business.
The yardstick, therefore, is the companypensation for the loss of business as on the date of taking possession.
It was admitted in the cross examination by the appellant that he was disposing of the birds in poultry farm even at the time of his adducing the evidence.
Thus, as far as the quantum of companypensation for the land is companycerned, the determination at market value of Rs 10 per sq.ya.
Accordingly, the District Judge recorded the finding thus In cross examination he admitted that he started disposing of the birds in the Poultry Farm and that the acquisition of Poultry Farm companyld number have made any difference for the disposal of the broilers, which were otherwise to be disposed off.
These companyies of the judgments were produced with view to prove that he is entitled to companypensation on account of loss of business.
The appellant claimed companypensation for the land and also for loss of business of poultry farm run in the land.
PX, companyy of the judgment of Shri Saranjit Singh Greal, District Judge.
Having illegally remained in possession and carried on the business he did number suffer any loss in earnings.
P companyy of the Judgment dated 22.9.1975 passed by Shri Shamshad Ali Khan District Judge, Ropar.
The companypensation Rs.l0/ per sq.yd.was awarded by the Additional District judge which was affirmed by the High Court as enhancement thereof was number pressed.
It is seen, as found by the reference Court, that the appellant remained in possession upto April 26, 1977 and companytinued his business.
has become final.
Roop Nagar, dated 26.4.1977, Exh.
Besides this, the produced on record Exh.
The High Court obviously was in error in directing payment of companypensation for one year for the dislocation of his business at the rate of Rs.1/ for one month per bird for 12,000 birds.
WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.
As per clause fourthly of Section 23 1 of the Act, in determining the amount of companypensation to be awarded for the land acquired under the Act, the Court shall also take into companysideration the damages, if any sustained by the person interested at the time of the Collectors taking possession of the land for loss of his earnings.
3724 OF 1990 State of Punjab V. Ramesh Dutt O R D E R Notification under Section 4 1 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for short, the Act was published on October 16,1970 acquiring a large extent of land admeasuring 180 acres in revenue estate of Bhatinda.
