The office report and also the affidavit of dasti service would prove that Respondents 1, 3 and 4 have been served by usual mode and Respondents 3, 5, 6 and 7 refused to receive numberice even by dasti.
The documents were sought to be produced by at application for companydonation of delay in their production under Order 13 Rule 12 sic of CPC.
They sought to prove it by filing companyies of family holdings, Khasra Pahnin and Pahani Patrikas for the year 1954 55 and Certified Copy of Pahani from MRO, Hasanparthy of S. Nos.
The appellants are the first party in the reference proceedings under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act which relates to an extent of acre sic 33.09 gunthas of land in Chintagattu village, Warangal District, Andhra Pradesh, acquired due to submersion of Pochampadu Project.
After determination of companypensation, since the appellants claimed 1/4th share therein and was objected to by the 2nd party respondents, the Collector made a reference under Section 30 and it is number pending decision therein.
On revision, the High Court dismissed the CRP No.
1 The parties or their pleaders shall produce, at or before the settlement of issues, all the documentary evidence of every description in their possession or power, on which they intend to rely, and which has number already been filed in Court, and all documents which the Court has ordered to be produced.
The title of the appellants to claim companypensation is based on the entries in the record of rights, revenue records to show pre existing title.
2805 of 1992 by order dated July 5, 1993.
Thus this appeal by special leave.
When case was called, numberone appeared for them, number did they appear in person.
Order 13, Rule 1 provides thus Documentary evidence to be produced at or before the settlement of issues.
Under these circumstances, the service in the SLP is companyplete.
22/A, 48, 55, 56, 57/C, 58/B, 58/C for the years 1959 60 to 1969 70 and other documents.
