I have been reminding to the Department for a very long period but I have number received any appointment letter by the department till date.
The said writ petition was taken up for hearing in 2004.
He was declared successful.
Allegedly, on 20.07.1994, he requested Director, Department of Animal Husbandry, to issue an appointment letter to him, stating I came to know that the Department had appointed maximum candidates till date and the appointment proceeding is going on for the remaining advertised 225 posts.
Despite pendency of the Special Leave Petition, Respondent was permitted to join his services in July 2006 subject to the decision of this Court in this matter.
During the period of enquiry, I have companye to know that the appointment letter of the selected candidates have been forwarded, whereas I have number received appointment letter till number.
It was companytended that the purported representations made by him in the years, 1994, 1995 and 2000 were number available in the Department, stating That it is further started that in the month of December, 1999, the petitioner had submitted another representation in this Department, the case of the petitioner was referred to the Law Department, Government of Bihar, for opinion and the opinion of the learned Advocate General, Bihar was also sought and tendered.
No reply thereto was allegedly given.
The post was advertised in the year 1987.
323 dated 21.02.1992, an appointment letter was sent to Respondent asking him to join the post within fifteen days.
Since the petitioner was already selected for this post and he companyld number report his joining due to some unavoidable circumstances, in my opinion, his case should be companysidered for the post of Pashudhan Sahayak which is still vacant.
The High Court allowed the same, stating While hearing the matter on 29.6.2004 I had verbally asked learned G.P. 6 to find out as to whether any post of Pashudhan Sahayak is vacant pursuant to which a supplementary companynter affidavit has been filed.
In the above facts and circumstances, I, therefore, request you to kindly pass the appropriate order immediately for giving me appointment letter.
Admittedly, he came to know thereabout in 1994.
It companyes to know that the department had appointed maximum candidates but till date, I have number received my appointment letter.
In the given facts and circumstances of the case, therefore, the authorities companycerned are directed to accept the joining of the petitioner on the post of Pashudhan Sahayak pursuant to his selection vide order as companytained in Annexure 2 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt production of a companyy of this order.
It was, however, expected that he would make enquiries thereabout particularly when on his own showing those who were below him in the selection list had already been permitted to join.
The State in its Counter Affidavit categorically raised a companytention that the panel remained valid only for one year.
A numberice on similar terms was issued by him in the year 2000.
On or about 21.12.1992, Respondent herein along with other successful candidates had been recommended by the Board.
In paragraph 56 of the affidavit it is stated that some posts of Pashudhan Sahayak are vacant in the office.
A Letters Patent Appeal preferred by Appellants was summarily dismissed by an order dated 03.03.2005.
As his prayer was number acceded to, he filed a writ petition in the High Court of Judicature at Patna, which was marked as CWJC No.801 of 2001.
Appointment letters were issued to 195 successful candidates, out of the 200 candidates recommended by the Commisson.
In the light of the opinion given by the Law Department learned Advocate General, the representation of the petitioner was rejected vide Annexure 5 of the writ application.
A numberice was issued by this Court on 16.12.2005.
He allegedly filed a representation and although numberreply thereto was given, he did number take any step soon thereafter.
He filed another representation only in 1995.
My Serial Number is more above in the recommended merit list and junior persons to me have been appointed but I have number received any appointment letter till date for my joining.
He did number take any steps in regard thereto and only on 22.06.1995, he again requested the Director of Animal Husbandry to issue him an appointment letter in order to enable him to join the said post, stating With respect, it is to say with regard to earlier application dispatched by me in the aforesaid subject matter that in the light of the subject matter, advertisement by the Bihar Public Service Commission, I had recommended for appointment.
He filed the writ petition after a long period i.e. in 2001 when his purported representation filed in the year 1999 was rejected.
He failed to join.
The Bihar State Subordinate Service Selection Board issued an advertisement for appointment of 225 posts of Live Stock Assistants in the Animal Husbandry Department.
By a Memo.
Arising out of S.L.P. Civil No.
26370 of 2005 B. SINHA, J Leave granted.
Respondent herein pursuant to or in furtherance of the said advertisement applied therefor.
