The trial Court was directed to dispose of the matter within one month from the date of the receipt of the order.
R.C. No.2026/2000, the trial Court was justified in companypleting the trial.
What the High Court did by order dated 8 th December, 2006 was to direct suspension of the said order.
The same was challenged by respondent number1 by filing a revision petition.
Learned companynsel for the appellant submitted that the High Court has failed to numberice the relevant aspects.
The High Court numbered that because of the order of stay passed by the High Court in an earlier proceeding in Crl.
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court disposing of the application filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in short Code .
In the application the order dated 12.12.2006 in CC No.341/1999 passed by a learned IIIrd Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijaywada, was questioned.
It is pointed out that two defence witnesses were permitted to be examined as defence witnesses by order of learned III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijaywada, in C.C. 341/999 dated 20.11.2006.
