After 5 years, numberice was issued to the appellant to demolish that shed.
Calling the same in question, the appellant filed the writ petition.
The admitted facts are that the appellant claimed to have purchased the disputed site from one A.M. Patil in 1965 and companystructed sheds thereon.
The respondents issued numberice to the appellant for demolition.
The Deputy Municipal Commissioner initially by order dated January 27, 1983 directed him to retain a shed admeasuring 30 x 30 but other structures were directed to be demolished.
In writ Petition No.
We have heard learned Counsel on both sides.
On that basis, he claimed that the structure was existing prior to April 1, 1962.
Leave granted.
He also alleged to have had a lease from him.
