1069 1097 of 2003 Arising out of S.L.P C Nos.10351/2002, 10434/2002, 10760/2001, 10804 10805/2001, 10870/2001, 1386/2002, 1387/2002, 17761/2001, 17762/2001, 20419 20421/2002, 20818 20819/2002, 20879/2002, 20904 20905/2002, 20906 20907/2002, 20922/2001, 20924/2001, 20925/2001, 20927/2001, 21207/2002, 21208/2002, 2702/2001, 3972/2002, 3974/2002 WP C Nos.522/2002, 553/2002, 554/2002, 555/2002, 556/2002, 557/2002, 558/2002, 559/2002, 562/2002, 566/2002, 591/2002, 592/2002, 593/2002, 594/2002, 595/2002, 596/2002, 598/2002, 599/2002, 602/2002, 613/2002, 614/2002, 615/2002 and Civil Appeal Nos.1098 1109/2003 Arising out of SLP C Nos.6996/2002, 7010/2002, 7046/2002, 7178/2001, 7783/2002, 8962/2002, 9812/2001, 24829 24830/2002, 28/2003, 15/2003 and 501/2003 P. MATHUR,J. Leave granted.
The writ petition preferred by the appellant was heard along with the aforesaid appeal.
After hearing the parties the Division Bench allowed the appeal filed by the Council and set aside the order of the learned Single Judge by which the Regulations were held to be ultra vires and invalid.
The petitioner then filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka praying that a writ of certiorari be issued for quashing the order dated August 18, 1999 issued by Regional Committee and further that Regulations 5 e and f in so far as they direct obtaining of a NOC from the State Government be struck down as unconstitutional and a direction be issued to the Regional Director to companysider the application of the appellant without insisting upon a NOC from the State Government.
A Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court had held that Regulations 5 e and f were ultra vires in another matter and against the said judgment the Council had preferred an appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court.
The respondents sent a letter dated August 18, 1999 stating that unless the State Government issued a No Objection Certificate hereinafter referred as NOC the application of the petitioner shall be treated as incomplete and shall number be companysidered.
JUDGMENT Arising out of SLP No.2421 of 2001 With Civil Appeal Nos.
The companynected writ petitions have been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution praying that the Regulations 5 e and f be declared as unconstitutional and invalid and a direction be issued to the respondents to companysider the application moved by the petitioners for grant of recognition for starting a teacher training companyrse without insisting upon a NOC from the State Government as provided in the aforesaid Regulations.
Consequently, the writ petition filed by the appellant was also dismissed.
The petitioner made an application to the Regional Director, National Council for Teacher Education Southern Committee Bangalore, seeking permission for starting a companyrse in Elementary Education Training in the year 1999 2000.
The appellant claims to be a Christian Minority Teacher Training Institute and is run and managed by the Tamilnadu Educational Trust which is engaged in the field of education since 1989.
2421 of 2001 which is the leading case.
