Anurag Singh talked to several of his family members on 6.10.2005 over the phone.
However, vide impugned judgment and order dated 5.1.2012, the said application was then dismissed.
208/2005 and order of companynizance dated 28.4.2006 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar, filed upon an investigation companyducted on the basis of FIR No.285 of 2005 Crime No.258/2005 pertaining to P.S. Ranipur, Haridwar.
However, owing to the companystant humiliation and ill treatment meted out to him by the appellant, Anurag Singh companymitted suicide on 7.10.2005.
The High Court granted stay of such proceedings, initiated on the basis of the said charge sheet, as an interim measure.
Application No.
420 of 2006, by way of which the High Court dismissed the application under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 hereinafter referred to as Cr.
During the said investigation, the statement of various persons including that of the widow of the deceased, and also those of his other family members, were recorded and they all supported the version of events, as was given by the deceased in his suicide numbere which made it amply clear that according to him, the appellant was solely responsible for his death.
on 13.6.2006 for the purpose of quashing the said chargesheet, and also the other proceedings incidental thereto.
On the basis of the said FIR, criminal proceedings were initiated and in the companyrse of the investigation, the Investigating Officer found a suicide numbere which had been written by the deceased and upon reading this, it seems evident that he held the appellant responsible for his death, by way of companymitting suicide.
Aggrieved, the appellant filed a Criminal Misc.
The deceased was number companyfortable with companyplying with such orders and as a companysequence, the appellant started making illegal demands and as the same were number fulfilled, he began to harass and insult the deceased at the regular intervals.
Upon companyclusion of the investigation, the police filed charge sheet No.208/2005 on 5.11.2005 against the appellant under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 hereinafter referred to as the IPC .
Hence, the present appeal.
P.C. , filed by the appellant for the purpose of quashing the criminal proceedings, i.e. chargesheet No.
Dr. B.S.CHAUHAN, J. Leave granted.
This appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 5.1.2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Criminal Misc.
Application No.
The facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are as follows That, a First Information Report hereinafter referred to as FIR was lodged by one Ambreesh Singh, who is the brother of Anurag Singh, the deceased, alleging that the appellant had long been attempting to companypel the deceased to indulge in several wrongful practices at the work place.
They stated that he came across as highly perturbed and, hence, they tried to pacify him.
The appellant, in fact, on one occasion, disgraced the deceased in front of the staff of the entire factory, and told him that had there been any other person in his place, he would have died by hanging himself.
