Sections 3 and 4 of the Act are as follows Acquisition of rights of owners in respect of sick textile undertakings.
The High.
The Ordi nance was later replaced by the Sick Textile Undertakings Nationalisation Act, 1974 hereinafter referred to as Sick Textile Act .
Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated the 22nd January, 1975 of the Bombay High Court in Appeal No.
106 of 1969 in Misc.
1 On the appointed day every sick textile taking and the right title and interest of the owner in relation to every such sick textile undertakings shall stand transferred to, and shall vest absolutely in, the Central Government.
7 502 SCI/77 N. Shroff and H.S. Parihar for the Appellants.
On September 21, 1974 an ordinance called the Sick Textile Undertakings Nationalisation Ordinance, 1974 was .promulgated by virtue of which the textile undertaking of the companypany the management of which had been taken over by the Central Government, vested absolutely in the Central Government with effect from the appointed day, which was April 1, 1974, and immediately thereafter stood transferred and vested in the National Textile Corporation.
During the pendency of the appeal, the management of the companypany was taken over by the Central Government on October 8, 1972 under the Industries Development and Regulation Act, 1951.
309 of 1976.
320 of 1964.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by GUPTA, J. Ahmedabad Jupiter Spinning Weaving and Manu facturing Company Limited was the owner of 5900 Sq.
A single Judge of the High Court having dismissed the writ petition on August 11, 1969 the companypany preferred a. letters patent appeal.
Petition No.
Notifications under sections 4 and 6 were issued on June 19, 1961 and May 29, 1964 respectively.
yds of land forming part of its mill premises at Lower Parel in Bombay which was sought to be acquired by the Maharashtra Government for a municipal school.
The companypany filed a petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the validity of the numberifica tions on several grounds.
N. Shroff for Respondents 1 and 2.
P. Ram an, Addl.
Genl, K.J. John and Shri Narain for Respondent No.
