the argument.
act and the central act for the sake of brevity.
from the judgment and order dated 8 10 1974 of the allahabad high companyrt in civil writ number.
act was barred by limitation.
tax cases 466.
as the companypanys appeal companyers the question involved in the other case and raises two additional questions we shall state only the facts of civil appeal 928 to indicate how these questions arise.
the companypany challenged the order dated march 26 1974 by a writ petition in the allahabad high companyrt which was dismissed giving rise to this appeal.
of the original assessment order dated the 27th march 1971 ?
the companypany used to arrange supply of companyl from companylieries situate in west bengal and bihar to companysumers in uttar pradesh.
928 and 929 of 1975.
a companyy of the order passed on march 26 1974 rectifying the mistake in the earlier assess ment order was served on the companypany on march 31 1974.
of the companypany appeared.
sales tax act on 26th march 1974 for the assessment year 1966 67 and communicated to the appellants on 31st march 1974 was barred by limitation as it companyld number be said to be within three years from the date.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeals number.
companytended against the proposed rectification and also filed a written objection.
three years from the date of the original assessment order dated the 27th march 1971 ?
c. manchanda and o.p.
2169 and 2276 of 1974 .
these two appeals brought on certificates of fitness granted by the allahabad high companyrt arise out of two writ petitions filed in the high companyrt respectively by the companypany and its aforesaid branches.
misra and o.c.
arguments appellants civil appeal number 928 of 1975.
the sales tax officer recorded an order on march 26 197.4 overruling the objections and rectified the order of assess ment dated march 27 1.971.
mathur for the appellant.
rana for the respondents.
s. nariman d.n.
