After the award was filed, numberice of the filing of the award was directed to be issued to the parties on 13.01.1997.
Aggrieved, the appellants filed FAO OS No.
Notice was served on the Union of India, but numberice companyld number be served on the Executive Engineer, P.W.D. A letter dated 21.03.1997 was addressed by the Executive Engineer to the Registrar of the Delhi High Court saying that he had number received a formal numberice from the companyrt.
The facts very briefly are that the appellants and the respondent No.1 entered into a companytract for companystruction of PMT Complex for NSG at Manesar.
On 17.07.1997, fresh numberice was again directed to be issued to the Executive Engineer.
While service of numberice on the Executive Engineer was awaited, Union of India filed objections to the award of the arbitrator numbered as IA 9423 of 1997.
551 of 2001 before the Division Bench of the High Court.
The petition was registered as Suit No.1673 A/1996.
The companytract companytained an arbitration clause for resolving disputes between the parties.
The arbitrator published his award on 17.06.1996 and on 08.07.1996, the respondents filed a petition in the High Court of Delhi under Sections 14 and 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 for short the Act for filing the award and for making the award a rule of the companyrt and for passing a decree in terms of the award.
551 of 2001 for short the impugned order .
K. PATNAIK, J. This is an appeal against the order dated 03.01.2003 of the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi in FAO OS No.
