React this appeal by the State.
The trial Judge, namely, V Addl.
65/83 and 278, 561, 563, 567, 823 and 824/82 reversing the judgment of the trial Court and acquitting all the respondents of the offence punishable under Sections 396 and 412, I.P.C. has preferred these appeals.
To prove the prosecution version P.Ws.
The State on being aggrieved by the judgment of the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench rendered in Criminal Appeals Nos.
According to the prosecution after the dacoits had entered the house, Hardev Singh tried to run away but he was shot dead by the culprits.
1 to 4 and 6 were examined of whom P.W. 1 was inside the house along with the deceased.
The evidence the prosecution has let in to substantiate the charges levelled against the respondents is the test identification parade in which the witnesses are stated to have identified the culprits and the recoveries of certain articles which were the subject matter of dacoity.
The occurrence admittedly had occurred in the dark mid night of 15/16 4 1980.
