It is further submitted that the police received an anonymous letter on 28.8.2015 stating that the appellant gave an injection to his wife and killed her.
She suffered a heart attack in the intervening night of 8 9.7.2015 and hence was examined by one doctor Prabhakaran.
841 of 2016, whereby the High Court rejected the application filed by the appellant for grant of anticipatory bail.
Therefore, he filed Criminal Bail Application 472/16 before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Solapur.
After more than a month in August, 2015, on the basis of an anonymous letter sent to the Commissioner of Police, Solapur raising suspicion about the death of the wife of the appellant and that the appellant had extra marital affairs, therefore he companymitted murder of his wife, appellant was interrogated by the police.
The parents of the deceased have number lodged any companyplaint against the accused.
Father in law of the appellant has sworn to an affidavit that she was living a happy married life with the appellant and that she had died a natural death.
Immediately after the death of Dr. Rashmi, her parents were informed by the appellant about her death and they had companye to Solapur.
Since she was found dead, Dr. Prabhakaran issued a medical certificate to that effect.
6 It is number disputed that more than a month after the death of Dr. Rashmi, wife of the deceased the respondent has registered a case on the basis of an anonymous letter.
Ms. Rashmi was diabetic and she was being treated by companysulting Dr. Mule.
He was married to Rashmi in the year 2010 and they have a son by name Neerav, who was born in April, 2012 and who is mentally challenged.
The police has been repeatedly visiting his house for interrogation and he is having apprehension that the police will register offence against him and he would be arrested.
4 Learned companynsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is a doctor by profession and is a renowned neuro surgeon attached to Gangamai Hospital, Solapur and his wife was also a doctor.
It is further companytended that on the basis of the said letter an inquiry had been initiated and the appellant had been summoned for inquiry.
The appellant has number companymitted any offence as alleged.
After a passage of about one month, an anonymous letter addressed to the Commissioner of Police, Solapur stating that the appellant had extra marital affairs with one Megh Roy Chodhuri and in order to obtain benefit of insurance policy which was in the name of the deceased Rashmi, the appellant companymitted her murder.
The High Court dismissed the application by order dated 15.6.2016.
He married to Ms. Rashmi, who was also a doctor.
In laws of the appellant had sworn an affidavit on 14.7.2015 and 6.4.2016 about the natural death of the wife of the appellant.
3 The appellant moved the High Court by filing an application for grant of anticipatory bail in Criminal Application No.841 of 2016.
The appellant is a doctor by profession and specialized in neuro surgery.
Therefore, the High Court is number justified in rejecting the application of the appellant for grant of anticipatory bail.
He was practicing at Ahmed Nagar but shifted to Solapur in the year 2012 and is practicing as Neuro Surgeon in Solapur.
2 This appeal is directed against the order dated 15th June, 2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Anticipatory Bail Application No.
He has companyperated with the police during investigation.
5 On the other hand, learned companynsel appearing for the State submits that the wife of the appellant had died in suspicious circumstances.
Without companyducting post mortem, the body of the deceased was cremated in an electric crematorium.
It is the case of the appellant that his wife was suffering from chronic diabetes and was under treatment.
The appellant took disadvantage of his position as doctor and himself issued medical certificate about death of his wife and showed that his wife died natural death.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the High Court has rightly rejected the application.
The District Sessions Judge by order dated 3.5.2016 rejected the application.
Thereafter, appellant obtained death certificate and took the insurance claim of the deceased.
She died on 9th July, 2015 at about 1.00 a.m. The appellant informed this fact to her parents who had companye to Solapur on the next day and after due companysideration and affirmation that the death of Rashmi was natural due to heart failure, they all decided to cremate her.
ABDUL NAZEER, J. 1 Leave granted.
The parents of the deceased wife of the appellant were immediately informed and they came to Solapur on 9.7.2015, after having satisfied that her death was natural, took a companylective decision along with the appellant number to perform post mortem.
This affidavit was required for cancellation of their tickets from Bangalore to Frankfurt and for refund.
