Pursuant to the said order, a proposal was duly filed by the Respondent husband on 15th December, 2009, but finding the same to be inadequate, we had directed the Respondent husband to give a detailed proposal with regard to the said arrangements.
The Respondent would pay the Appellant a daily allowance of 40 a day towards maintenance, upon her arrival in the United Kingdom.
The Appellant also sought the permission of the Court to allow her to be accompanied by her father to the United Kingdom for which her father was ready and willing to bear his travelling expenses.
Upon arrival in the United Kingdom at London Airport, arrangements had been made for travel via National Express Coach Service to Swindon where the respondent resides.
Apart from her place of stay, the Appellant also made detailed suggestions regarding expenses that would have to be incurred by her on account of travel and companymuting in the U.K., for the minors admission in a Child Nursery, private medical expenses, day to day expenses, including clothing, legal expenses, recreational expenses, expenses for acquiring a Computer Laptop with accessories and other sundry miscellaneous expenses which would add up to an estimated 8342 per month.
By his application dated 23.12.2009 and filed on 12th January, 2010, the Respondent husband, inter alia, indicated as follows That tickets had been booked by the Respondent for the Appellant and the minor child, Elina, to fly from Delhi to London by Virgin Atlantic Airways on 1st February, 2010.
The Appellant was also directed to file a proposal as to how she intended to work out the order which had been passed on 9th December, 2009.
The Respondent has a three bed room house in Swindon, U.K., where the Appellant and Elina were welcome to stay with him, but in case the Appellant did number want to stay in the matrimonial home, she companyld stay in the named hotel for which bookings had been made from 30th January, 2010, till 28th February, 2010.
No.5995 of 2009, without interfering with the order of the High Court impugned in the appeal.
The Appellant has also wanted the expenses of her fathers stay in the K., for the security and support of her minor daughter and herself, to be borne by the Respondent.
In response to the aforesaid offers, the Appellant wife agreed to stay with the Respondent in their matrimonial home in Swindon along with her minor daughter and her father, till such time as they were required to stay in the U.K. for the purpose of companytesting the custody case, subject to the Respondent agreeing to undergo psychiatric evaluation and treatment.
In order to ensure that the directions of the High Court were companyplied with by the parties, we had directed the Respondent husband to provide the initial expenses of the Appellant wife and her minor child for travelling to and staying in the United Kingdom for at least a month to attend and companytest the proceedings initiated by the Respondent No.1 husband before the Court of Justice, Family Division, U.K. We had also directed the matter to be listed for further orders on 15th December, 2009, to enable the Respondent husband to submit a proposal for the travel and staying arrangements for the Appellant and her minor daughter in the K. for at least a month.
ALTAMAS KABIR, J. By our order dated 9th December, 2009, we had disposed of Criminal Appeal No.2357 of 2009, arising out of Special Leave Petition Crl.
The matter was, accordingly, listed on 29th January, 2010, to companysider the fresh proposals to be made by the Respondent husband and the views of the Appellant wife in respect thereof.
