The appellant having obtained special leave, the appeal is number before us for disposal.
S. N. Singh, J., held that the lower appellate companyrt had companyrectly interpreted the section.
Appeals by special leave from the judgments and orders dated March 25, 1968 and March 20, 1968 of the Allahabad High Court in Criminal Revision No.
528, 576 and 518 of 1967.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeals Nos.
This Writ Petition was heard alongwith these civil appeals and will be disposed of by a separate judgment.
In order to appreciate the point a few relevant facts in the case of Civil Appeal No 2018 of 1968 may be given.
C. Manchanda and O. P. Rana, for respondent in all the appeals .
C. Agarwala and D. P. Singh, for the appellants in all the appeals .
2018, 2019 and 2020 of 1968.
In Writ Petition 261 of 1968 the vires of this provision is challenged.
The appellant filed a revision before the High Court.
One objection was that he has a specialised farm and certain plots were being used for growing grass or for growing special types of crops which were used as fodder for horses.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Sikri, C. J, These appeals by special leave raise a companymon question as to the interpretation of Section 6, Clause of the U. P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 U. P. Act 1 of 1961 hereinafter referred to as the Act and can companyveniently be disposed of together.
