District Judge by his judgment and decree dated February 28, 1994 reversed the decree and dismissed the suit and in the second appeal it was companyfirmed.
According to him, he had purchased the business of the restaurant on July 2, 1951 for a companysideration of Rs.
Since he was employed as a teacher and the respondent was loitering jobless, he put the respondent in charge of the business.
The trial Court decreed the suit on October 28, 1986, but on appeal the Addl.
However, due to mismanagement of the business on the part of respondent, the appellants father filed the suit with the above relief.
Since P.V. Rusdevacharya happened to be the relative of the opponent and his elder brother, the dealings were companytinued for a long time.
In the earlier proceedings, the respondent had made an unequivocal admission in the written statement as under In 1946 P. Vasudevacharya had taken a loan from Sitaramacharya the elder brother of the opponent.
The appellants father filed the suit for declaration and rendition of account from the respondent.
2000/ out of his own funds under Ex.
Leave granted.
Thus this appeal by special leave.
The appellant Court has recorded in this behalf as under But in this case opined that the present defendant made admission in Ex.
