778 of 1970 was filed by the appellant for purchasing the right, title and interest of the landowners, during the pendency of which the present companytesting respondents got themselves impleaded by raising a claim that they have the right to purchase the landowners title and interest in respect of 80 cents of land companyprising of suit property.
In the meanwhile the companytesting respondents moved the Land Tribunal through an application purportedly under Section 72MM of the Act showing that the landowners have also signed therein and prayed for an order allowing the respondents to purchase the right, title and interest of the landowners in respect of the aforesaid 80 cents.
A 7 order on 19.5.1973 allowing the respondent to purchase the right, title and interest of the landowner in respect of the said 80 cents of land.
4308 of 1976 was pending that in respect of 80 cents of the disputed property the OA is number maintainable.
B 10 was issued on 18.7.1975.
Two sets of persons put forward rival claims of tenancy over the said land and applied for Certificate of Purchase under the relevant provisions of the Kerala Land Reforms Act the Act for short .
Suffice it to say that the said OA is still remaining before the Land Tribunal pending final disposal, and it was later renumbered as OA No.
29 of 1977 for a declaration that Exts.
B 10 the companytesting respondents turned against the appellants and informed the Land Tribunal before which OA No.
It is number necessary to refer to the chequered career which the said OA had undergone even by number.
It is admitted that the appellants were number made parties thereto.
It was in the said backdrop that the appellants filed the present suit OS No.
On the footing of the said order the Certificate of Purchase Ext.
1810 of 1971.
A 7, and B 10 are vitiated by fraud, companylusion etc.
A 7 and Ext.
Without the appellants getting any knowledge about the pendency of the said OA the Land Tribunal happened to pass Ext.
The factual position is this A land having an extent of 1.20 acres is the subject matter of litigation.
Hence, the appellants preferred this appeal by special leave.
It is numbered as OA No.
OA No.
4308 of 1976.
Armed with Ext.
