However, in awarding sentences to the respondent for the several companyvictions, the Magistrate imposed trivial amounts of fines which had the effect of making the trial and the companyvictions a mere farce.
MYT 30 36 in a rash and negligent manner at about 8.30 P.M. on 30.4.80 on the Madhugiri Hosakere Road and hitting a bullock cart as a result of which one of the persons travelling in the cart Rangappa alias Veeramallapa sustained fatal injuries and another passenger sustained simple injuries.
P.C. to the High Court of Karna taka for enhancement of sentence.
451/81 preferred by the State has company pelled the State of Karnataka to approach this Court under Article 136 1105 of the Constitution to file this Appeal by Special Leave.
653 of 1986 From the Judgment and Order dated 31.1.1983 of the Karnataka High Court in Crl.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
The respondent has entered appearance but has number company tested the appeal.
Satish for the Respondent.
451 of 1981 N. Diwede, M. Veerappa and Ashok Kumar Sharma for the Appellant.
198/80 on the file of his companyrt by the Additional Munsif cum Additional Judicial Magistrate First Class Madhugiri and the refusal of the High Court of Karna taka to enhance the sentence of the respondent in exercise of its powers under Section 377 Criminal Procedure Code in Criminal Appeal No.
A. No.
442 of 1980 P.R. No.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by NATARAJAN, J. The light hearted and casual manner of disposal of the case against the respondent in C.C. No.
After the accident the respondent failed to secure medical assistance to the injured persons and also failed to report the accident to the police authorities.
The respondent was charged under Sections 279,337, and 304 A Indian Penal Code and Sections 89 a and 89 b of the Motor Vehicles Act for having driven an Express bus bearing Registration No.
