The case has a chequered history.
Aggrieved by the order of termination so passed, the appellant was companystrained to approach the writ companyrt once again in C.W.J.C. No.
Taking into companysideration the report so filed and the fact that the appellant was appointed against a regular vacancy and that there was numberbetter companytender for the post at the time of the appellants appointment, the learned Single Judge observed that the DIG of police had malafidely represented the height of the appellant to be 164 cm.
The respondents, number being satisfied with the explanation offered, terminated the services of the appellant.
In view of the orders passed by the High Court, the Inspector General of Police had issued the order dated 6.3.1997 terminating the services of the appellant as a companystable in the police force.
202 of 1988, the learned Single Judge thought it fit to direct the Deputy Inspector General of Police Headquarters , Patna hereinafter referred to as the DIG of police, to measure the height of the writ petitioners including the appellant and file a report of the same before the Court.
A Constable, whose services are terminated from the Police Department, has filed this appeal impugning the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Patna in L.P.A. No.
Pursuant to the direction so issued, the DIG of police measured the height of the writ petitioners including the appellant and submitted his report before the High Court.
The Chief Medical Officer, in his report, had reported the height of the appellant as 166 cm.
The order of the learned Single Judge was carried in appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court in L.P.A. No.
In the report, the appellants height was indicated as only 164 cm, falling short of 165 cm.
The learned single Judge, while allowing the writ petition, took exception to lack of reasoning in the show cause numberice and orders of termination, however, as the respondents attempted to justify the termination on the ground that the height of the writ petitioners was number in accordance with the Police Order No.
The appellant amongst others, was asked to show cause why his services should number be terminated for the reasons stated in the numberice.
as required by the Police Order No.202 of 1988.
By the impugned judgment and order, the Division Bench has set aside the order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.1314/2000 dated 17.02.2006, by which the appellant was reinstated into service with full back wages and service benefits.
The appellant, after receipt of the numberice, had offered his explanation, inter alia, companytending that his appointment was made following the guidelines prescribed in Police Order No.202 of 1988.
The appellant and others filed the writ petitions, inter alia, for quashing their termination order as illegal and arbitrary.
1314 of 2000.
As a companysequence, the writ petition came to be allowed and the respondents were directed to companytinue the services of the appellant and also to pay the back wages from the date of termination of his service till the date he is reinstated into service.
Since there was a factual assertion made by the appellant and disputed by the DIG of Police, the learned Single Judge, in the ends of justice, had appointed the Civil Surgeon cum Chief Medical Officer, Patna hereinafter referred to as Chief Medical Officer to measure the height of the appellant and submit his report before the Court.
Leave granted.
The appellant was appointed as police companystable by the respondents in the month of October, 1992 and he served on this post till 1996.
Taking into companysideration the report of the DIG of Police, the High Court disposed of the writ petition by its order dated 28.02.1997, ordering the reinstatement of those who met the criterion of height, while stating that appropriate orders may be passed in the case of those persons who did number have the requisite height.
The appellant primarily companytended and asserted that his height was 165.5 cm and number 164 cm as recorded in the report submitted by the DIG of police.
583/2006 dated 30.04.2010.
