The first appeal filed by the appellant was also dismissed, where after he preferred a second appeal which was also dismissed by the High Court by its Judgment and order dated August 1, 2002.
82 of 1997.
The only facts required to be numbericed are that the respondent herein, after serving a numberice upon the appellant terminating the lease under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, instituted a suit for his eviction on June 2, 1979.
The petitioner then preferred a special leave petition before this Court, which was also dismissed subject to the liberty granted to the appellant to seek a review from the High Court by moving an application within a period of two weeks from the date of the order.
Pursuant to the liberty given, the appellant moved the High Court by filing a review petition, which has been dismissed by the impugned order.
The suit was decreed by the learned Sub Judge, Delhi by judgment and decree of 22nd October, 1983.
It appears that before filing the suit two numberices were given to the appellant, namely numberices dated 10th February, 1979 and 17th March, 1979, According to the appellant, despite numberice terminating the tenancy, the respondent accepted rent for the months of April and May, 1979 and thereafter.
443 of 2002 passed in Regular Second Appeal No.
P. Singh, J. This appeal by special leave is directed against the Judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi dated 27th May, 2003 in Review Application No.
