To arrive at a companyclusion as to whether the order passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada was an order refusing to set aside the award, we have to companysider the facts.
Notice under Section 14 2 of the Act was issued to the respondent on the same date.
The respondent made an abortive attempt to set aside the award and to have the minority award made a rule of Court before the award was filed.
Two arbitrators passed an award in favour of the appellant before us and the third decided in favour of the respondent.
The award was filed on 27.8.97.
There was numberunanimity among the Arbitrators.
Disputes between the parties were referred to three arbitrators in terms of an arbitration agreement.
