Accordingly the Letters Patent Appeal filed by the respondents was allowed and the Communication Order dated 12.8.1991 by the State Government was quashed.
The Division Bench by the impugned judgment held that the respondents were entitled to all the benefits available to permanent employees of the State Government under the Government Resolution dated 17.10.1988 and numberorder diluting reversing the same can companyld be passed by any other Authority Functionaries of the State Government.
Learned Single Judge held that the respondents were daily workers who were temporarily appointed for transitory work on a work charge basis and companyld number be treated at par with regular employees who were appointed on the basis of Recruitment Rules.
It was held that benefits apart from those clearly mentioned in the resolution dated 17.10.1988 like leave travel companycession, leave increment, various advances, allotment of Government quarter were admissible to daily wagers companyered under the said resolution.
By the impugned judgment the Division Bench set aside the judgment of a learned Single judge who had dismissed the writ petition filed by the respondents.
6979 of 2005 ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Arising out of SLP C Nof .
The State of Gujarat and Superintending Engineer, Capital Project Circle, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, question legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court .
