Soon after the registration of the FIR referred to in the foregoing paragraph, the petitioner filed a companyplaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 on 24.9.2004.
Along with her companyplaint, the petitioner claims to have filed her evidence by way of a personal affidavit.
The aforesaid companyplaint was made against respondent number2, Mrs.Veena Solanki.
Thereafter on 25.9.2006, the Magistrate Negotiable Instruments Act trying the companyplaint, allowed respondent number2 to cross examine the petitioner.
Though a period of more than five years has elapsed after the filing of the charge sheet, we are informed, that charges are yet to be framed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate South Saket, New Delhi.
On 16.4.2007, i.e., more than three years after the registration of the aforesaid FIR, a charge sheet was filed against the petitioner and five others , under Sections 420, 468 and 471 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J. Respondent number2 Mrs. Veena Solanki got FIR No.13 of 2004 registered at Police Station Lodhi Colony on 13.4.2004.
Therein she made allegations against the petitioner Ms.Karuna Singh and five others.
