4726.70 to each of the following persons 1 Rattan Singh s o Gopal 2 Nand Lal s o Gopal 3 Singh Raj s o Gopal 4 Mst.
Hence this appeal by special leave.
On November 17, 1964, the real Rattan Singh appeared before Shri D.R. Dhameja and claimed payment of the amount due to him.
The total amount to be distributed among them was Rs.
In case of wrong payment, I shall be responsible to refund the amount.
Thereafter vouchers were prepared.
To that end applications were filed on their behalf by the appellant.
The appellant also cashed the voucher for the amount payable to Rattan Singh.
Chameli, d o Gopal and 6 Smt.
The said companyrt directed payment of Rs.
The Land Acquisition Collector made a reference under Sections 30 and 31 of the said Act, The reference was number ed 96 of 1964 in the Court of the Additional District and Sessions Judge Delhi, Shri D.R. Dhameja.
28360.20 p. In July 1964 the aforesaid accused entered into a criminal companyspiracy to obtain payment of the aforesaid amount by fraud, forgery and impersonation.
The prosecution case is this A certain piece of land situate in village Tehkhand Delhi was acquired under the Land Acquisition Act.
On October 24, 1964, Shri D.R. Dhameja directed that payment should be made to the applicants who were the accused .
Kadmi widow of Gopal.
One of the vouchers was prepared in the name of the appellant, for, earlier he had made an application on behalf of Rattan Singh praying that the vouchers should be drawn in his name.
Jhumman Singh, however, was able to cash the voucher drawn in the name of Singh Raj.
Chameli, he has been companymitted to the Court of Session for trial for the offences under Section 120B read with Sections 419, 420, 511 and Section 467 read with Section 471 I.P.C. He applied to the High Court of Delhi for quashing the companymitment order against him.
The application purporting to be on behalf of Rattan Singh a real claimant was signed by the appellant as his companynsel.
The verification was signed by him.
On the application purporting to be on behalf of Nand Lal another real claimant the appellant verified I personally know Nand Lal s o Gopal.
The treasury vouchers were prepared in the names of the accused on November 7, 1964.
The High Court dismissed his revision.
Ram Wati and Mst.
Thereupon payment was stopped and four of the vouchers companyld number be cashed.
Along with the reference the Land Acquisition Collector also sent a cheque for the amount of companypensation settled by him to the Court of the Additional District and Sessions Judge.
Shanti, Dina Nath, Mst.
He has signed in my presence.
N. Dwivedi.
J. The appellant, Hira Lal Jain, is an Advocate.
Along with Jhumman Singh, Mst.
His application brought to light the alleged criminal companyspiracy of the accused.
Kala wati d o Gopal 5 Mst.
