That was rejected by the Government.
The grounds of detention companymunicated to the detunu stated that he along with others companymitted dacoity on 1 3 1973 and 6 3 1973, that it had created panic among the villagers and that if he was let at large he would be a menace to public order.
He filed a representation on 5 7 1973.
The representation was thereafter sent to the Advisory Board.
The only ground urged by companynsel for the petitioner was that the representation of the detenu was number forwarded to the Advisory Board or companysidered by it and, therefore, the detention of the petitioner was bad.
K. Mathew, J. The petitioner challenges the validity of an order of detention passed on 7 6 1973 under the provisions of Sub section 3 of Section 3 of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971.
In pursuance to the order, the petitioner was detained on 18 6 1973.
