Avnish Bajaj filed Criminal Misc.
Being aggrieved by the order framing of charge, the appellant moved the High Court in Criminal Revision No.
Being grieved by the aforesaid order, Avnish Bajaj preferred Criminal Appeal No.
After the judgment was delivered, the present appellant filed an application before the trial companyrt to drop the proceedings against him.
As a logical sequitur, the appeals are allowed and the proceedings initiated against Avnish Bajaj as well as the Company in the present form are quashed.
645 of 2004.
After the investigation was companycluded, charge sheet was filed before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate who on 14.02.2006 took companynizance of the offences punishable under Sections 292 and 294 of the Indian Penal Code IPC and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 for short, the IT Act against all of them.
Dipak Misra, J. Leave granted.
The appellant along one Avnish Bajaj and others was arrayed as an accused in FIR No.
