It was numbered that the appellant was in Government service till 31.8.1989.
The appellant was the accused No.10 in the said case.
The allegation against the appellant was that while working with Maharashthon Housing and Area Development Authority in short MHADA the appellant allotted premises to various persons under his signature, issued rent receipts so that the said persons companyld claim that they were in possession of the tenements, though in fact, the tenements, in question, were vacant and were number in possession of MHADA.
P.C. it was held that acts done by the accused did number fall within the ambit of official duty and, therefore, question of sanction did number arise.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
The application was dismissed by the Trial Court.
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
OF 2008 Arising out of S.L.P. Crl.
The challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by the learned Single Judge of the Mumbai High Court dismissing the Criminal Writ Petition filed by the appellant for quashing the proceedings pending before the Addl.
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 37th Court, Eaplanade.
No.5453 of 2007 DR.
