However, in 1988 since a few posts of typists were available, under the Staff Arrangement Scheme, the appellants on 29 11 1988 invited candidates from Class IV staff who had typing speed in Hindi English of 25/30 words per minute to apply for ad hoc appointment as typists.
Therefore, by an office order dated 7 10 1991 the respondents were reverted from the post of typists to the Class IV posts which they substantially held.
Accordingly, a typing test was held and the respondents were temporarily appointed as typists.
It is the case of the appellants that the posts of typists were thereafter surrendered as a measure of economy and there were numberavailable posts against which these 5 persons companyld be retained.
The respondents, however, challenged their reversion before the Central Administrative Tribunal.
The respondents were initially appointed in Class IV posts.
The Tribunal has given certain other directions as regards their position qua other daily rated workmen.
By the impugned judgment and order of the Tribunal the appellants were directed to reappoint the respondents.
