11.11.2003 till the date of order of regularisation dated 28.05.2004.
34181 of 2003 has been violated.
11.11.2003 vide University order dated 28.05.2004.
A cheque No.
It is number denied that the applicant has already been reinstated and is being paid salary of lecturer from the date of judgment.
13,11,518/ after deducting income tax of Rs.
This order was passed in the companytempt jurisdiction.
In my view, there is substantial companypliance of the writ order.
18,98,000/ is being tendered in the companyrt to the appellant subject to the final outcome of the present Civil Appeal.
The deponent, the alleged companytemnor was appointed as Officiating Registrar on 20.12.2012 of the University.
A sum of Rs.
The impugned order reads as follows This companytempt petition has been filed with the allegation that the order of the writ companyrt dated 11 11 2003 passed in writ petition No.
This case was never brought to his numberice before and it was only after the show cause numberice in the suo moto companytempt as mentioned above, he gathered the papers of the case and took immediate steps for release of the arrears of payment of salary to the Appellant.
34181 of 2003 in companypliance of the order passed by the Honble High Court for Dr. Abhinav Gupta and it was specifically mentioned that the said post would only remain in existence as long as Dr. Abhinav Gupta was in the University and thereafter, the post should automatically cease to exist After the aforesaid sanction from the State Government for creation of a post of lecturer for Dr. Abhinav Gupta, the services of Dr. Gupta were regularised as lecturer in the pay scale of Rs.
Contempt Application No.
Paragraph o of the affidavit reads as follows The University thereafter became a Central University in 2005 as mentioned above.
In view of the aforesaid, numberices are discharged.
When the matter was pending before this Court, the Registrar of the University of Allahabad filed a detailed affidavit dated 11.11.2014.
273 of 2004 passed by the High Court of judicature at Allahabad.
The appellant approached this Court, aggrieved by the order dated 30.09.2005 in Civil Misc.
666475 dated 10.11.2014 drawn on State Bank of India, Allahabad University Branch for a sum of Rs.
Contempt petition is rejected and companysigned to record.
11.11.2003, the date of the judgment of the Honble High Court in C.M.W.P. No.
Signature Not Verified Upon issuance of numberice, affidavits have been exchanged between the Digitally signed by JAYANT KUMAR ARORA Date 2017.08.11 164406 IST Reason parties.
The learned companynsel for the appellant submits that there are two surviving grievances, one regarding regularisation and other regarding seniority.
8000 13500 w.e.f.
KURIAN, J. When the matter was taken up today, the learned companynsel for the respondent was number present.
