The matter was carried in revision before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in short the National Commission .
The respondent No.1 purportedly, on the basis of Clause 4 of the letter, sent a registered letter on 28.11.2001, intimating HUDA that he is number interested in accepting the allotment.
By order dated 31.03.2003, the District Forum directed refund of the amount deposited along with 12 interest with effect from the date of deposit till realisation.
The letter was received on 03.12.2001 by HUDA.
Referring to Clause 4 of the letter, HUDA directed forfeiture of the earnest money deposited.
The matter was carried in appeal before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, Chandigarh in short the State Commission by HUDA.
By the impugned order dated 04.02.2004, the revision has been dismissed.
O R D E R Arising out of S.L.P. C No.12371 of 2004 ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
A companyplaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 in short the Act was lodged by respondent No.1 before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Faridabad in short the District Forum .
The HUDA intimated respondent No.1 by letter dated 30.10.2001 that plot No.2205 in Sector 65, Faridabad has been alloted to him.
The companytroversy in this appeal lies within a very narrow companypass.
The application was for allotment of a residential plot measuring 250 square yards, and deposit of Rs.46,625/ was made on 26.12.2000.
The respondent No.1 applied for allotment of a plot in response to an advertisement issued by the Haryana Urban Development Authority in short HUDA .
