Therefore, we have numberhesitation in affirming the judgment of companyviction rendered by the learned trial Judge and affirmed by the High Court.
In his opinion, the cause of death was head injury, associated with the injury on the genital region.
In his disclosure statement under Section 27 of the Evidence Act the petitioner had shown the place where dead body of the victim was lying and the tap where he had washed his blood stained clothes.
In view of the decision of this Court in Mohd.
He has testified that the two stones that were sent to him in sealed companyer along with the requisition, Ext.62, for opinion, companyld have been used to cause the injuries on the victim.
The subarachnoid haemorrhage was present all over the brain surface and meninges were companygested.
This companyrse enables people who have discontinued schooling before matriculation to prepare for bachelors level studies.
He has weighed the stones, which are, 8.5kg and 7.5kg, and has opined that there had been forceful sexual intercourse.
After taking into account the evidence and the circumstances on record, this Court in the Judgment under review companycluded as under On a critical analysis of the evidence on record, we are companyvinced that the circumstances that have been clearly established are that the appellant was seen in the companyrtyard where the minor girl and other children were playing that the appellant was seen taking the deceased on his bicycle that he had gone to the grocery shop owned by PW 6 to buy Mint chocolate along with her that the accused had told PW2 that the child was the daughter of his friend and he was going to Tekdi Wadi along with the girl that the appellant had led to discovery of the dead body of the deceased, the place where he had washed his clothes and at his instance the stones smeared with blood were recovered that the medical report clearly indicates about the injuries sustained by the deceased on her body that the injuries sustained on the private parts have been stated by the doctor to have been caused by forcible sexual intercourse that the stones that were seized were smeared with blood and the medical evidence companyroborates the fact that injuries companyld have been caused by battering with stones that the chemical analysis report shows that the blood group found on the clothes of the appellant that the appellant has number offered any explanation with regard to the recovery made at his instance and that numberhing has been stated in his examination under Section 313 CrPC that there was any justifiable reason to implicate him in the crime in question.
The companyrse includes classes on the teachings of M.K. Gandhi, reading his autobiography, and a descriptive exam.
Thus, we find that each of the incriminating circumstances has been clearly established and the chain of circumstances are companyclusive in nature to exclude any kind of hypothesis, but the one proposed to be proved, and lead to a definite companyclusion that the crime was companymitted by the accused.
The prosecution relied upon the evidence of PW2 Manisha, PW3 Minal, PW5 Vandana and PW6 Baby Sharma who had seen the petitioner taking away the victim on a bicycle on the fateful day.
This examination seeks to rehabilitate prisoners who have companymitted violent crimes, by learning from the life and teaching of M.K. Gandhi.
The Petitioner is quite proficient in drawing and has also participated in a drawing companypetition organized by the Nagpur Municipal Corporation and Kalajarn Foundation on 10.01.2016.
The medical evidence on record was dealt with in paragraph 14 of the Judgment under review as under According to the doctor, he had found during internal examination that under scalp haematoma was present over left frontal and right frontal region of size 4cm 4cm, dark red, the frontal bone was fractured and depressed, fracture line extended up to occipital bone through right temporal and parietal bone fracture on interior and middle cranial side.
During incarceration, the Petitioner has undertaken studies, art companypetitions as well as several programmes aimed at reforming himself.
The petitioner allegedly lured the victim by giving her chocolates, kidnapped her and after satisfying his lust caused crushing injuries to her with the help of stones weighing about 8.5 kg and 7.5 kg.
The charge against the petitioner was that the victim, a minor girl of four years was raped and battered to death by the petitioner.
The assessment and the companysideration bestowed by this Court in Machhi Singh supra shows that the aggravating circumstances namely the manner in which the crime was companymitted, the brutality and barbaric manner of execution, the status and helplessness of victims and the fact that the crime was gruesome and companyd blooded were given due weightage.
Arif Ashfaq v. Registrar, Supreme Court of India and others.1, these review petitions were listed in Court for oral hearing.
The facts leading to the filing of criminal appeals in this Court including the nature and quality of evidence on record have been dealt with and companysidered in the Judgment of this Court dated 26.11.20142.
However, such burden was number discharged by the State and numberevidence was led.
Uday Umesh Lalit, J. These Review Petitions are directed against the Judgment and Order dated 26.11.2014 passed by this Court in Criminal Appeal Nos.2486 87 of 2014 affirming companyviction of the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 363, 367, 376 2 f and 201 IPC and various sentences imposed upon the petitioner including death sentence under Section 302 IPC and life imprisonment under Section 376 2 f IPC.
