1 and 2 herein have been permitted to move an application before the Collector for permanent settlement of the land in their favour under the Orissa Government Land Settlement Act, 1962 and the said application shall be decided by the Collector after numbericing the appellants herein.
O R D E R Appellants in these appeals have challenged the companyposite order passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in AHO No.
2884 of 2002 the High Court has partly set aside the order passed by the Collector, Puri dated 11.2.2002 after the remand of the case by the High Court.
2 of 1994 had been dismissed by the Commissioner as Respondent Nos 1 and 2 had failed to obtain a probate of the Will executed by Asit Kumar Ghose.
243 of 2001 arising from the order passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court in OJC No.
243 of 2001 the Division Bench has set aside the order passed by the learned Single Judge in OJC No.
691 of 2001 and restored that of the Revenue Division Commissioner Central , Cuttack hereinafter referred to as the Commissioner passed in Khasmahal Lease Appeal No.
The order of the Collector in so far as it rejected the claim of opposite party Nos.
1 and 2 after obtaining a probate from the High Court of Calcutta in PLA No.
The order of the Collector holding that the land in dispute can be kept by the Government sine numberone had a right to have the settlement.
It has been specifically stated that the appellants herein should be made a party before the Collector in the application to be filed by respondent Nos.
257 of 1997 decided on 17.5.2000.
4 to 6 appellants herein was upheld and it was observed that they did number have the right to the land.
2 of 1994 reviving the same on an application moved by the Respondent Nos.
691 of 2001 and OJC No.
Earlier Khasmahal Lease Appeal No.
In OJC No.
Respondent Nos.
2884 of 2002.
