The final development plan was accordingly brought into force with effect from March 31, 1986.
clause n or clause o of sub section 2 of section 12 and such land does number vest in the area development authority, the State Government shall number include the said reservation in the development plan, unless it is satisfied that such authority would acquire the land, whether by agreement or companypulsory acquisition, within ten years from the date on which the final development plan companyes into force.
1453 of 2005.
Notice regarding publication of the draft revised development plan calling suggestions on the proposed draft revised development plan was published in the Gazette on 29.2.1996.
1453 of 2005 and Miscellaneous Civil application for Review No.
The State Government having companysidered the draft development plan submitted by SUDA sanctioned the plan in the modified form on January 31, 1986 whereby the appellants lands in question were reserved for education companyplex of South Gujarat University.
However, numbersteps were taken by any of the authorities proposing to acquire the lands.
This was done in purported exercise of the power under Section 21 of the Act whereunder the development authority is under statutory obligation to revise the development plan at least once in 10 years from the date on which the final development plan companyes into force.
The Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976 for short the said Act came into force with effect from February 1st, 1978.
The matter was remitted for fresh companysideration in the light of the observations and the directions issued by the High Court.
The State Government in exercise of its power companyferred under the provisions of the Act companystituted Surat Urban Development Authority SUDA which prepared a draft development plan whereby the lands belonging to the appellants were proposed for designating the use of the lands for residential purposes.
Neither the Area Development Authority number the Authority for whose purpose land has been designated in the final Development Plan initiated any steps to acquire the lands of the appellants.
The appellants having waited for a period of 10 years from the date of companying into force of the final development plan got served a numberice on the Authority companycerned requiring it to acquire the land within six months from the date of the service of such numberice.
The final numberification was set aside on the ground that there was numbermaterial before the Government on the basis of which the decision to designate the lands for educational purposes companyld have been arrived at.
3165 of 2006 dated 14th February, 2007 whereby the High Court dismissed the cross objections filed by the appellants in LPA No.
2000 OF 2008 Arising out of SLP C No.
It is entitled either to sanction the draft development plan as submitted by the Authority or return the draft development plan for modification or make substantial modifications in the draft development plan by itself after inviting suggestions and objections.
CIVIL APPEAL NO.
Essentially grievance in this appeal pertains to the dismissal of cross objections preferred by the appellants.
9905 of 2007 SUDERSHAN REDDY,J. Leave granted.
This appeal by special leave is directed against the companymon judgment and order dated 10 15th November, 2006 of the Gujarat High Court at Ahmedabad in LPA No.
