The entire story as given below is revealed by friend of the accused, approver jasbir Inder Singh 21 PW 5 , who was arrested along with teh accused on August 13, 1968.
The accused booked a cycle at Sasni Railway Station and purchased two tickets for his wife and Bhanu Parkash Singh, but did number purchase any ticket for Satinder Kumar.
Accused Ravinder Singh and the approver were employed in the Air force department at Sirsa and were good friends.
Sulphuric acid was also found by the Chemical Examiner on jumper, dopatta, and petticoat in the wearing of the deceased.
the fate of Bimla thrown from the running train.
Satinder Kumar did number take any Part The accused removed the pazebs from her feet and gold jhumkas from her ears.
Since the accused has companye in appeal against the judgment of the High Court as a matter of right, we have heard his learned companynsel at length and also examined the evidence with care.
She was later sent to the Civil Hospital, Rewari, where she was received by Dr Manocha PW 1 , She was number in a position to make a statement at the Civil Hospital and she expired at 8.45 P.M. on July 31,1968.
They decided to leave their house at Now Mandi and again started living in the barracks of the Air Force from August 8.
the accused threw his wife Bimla on the floor of the companypartment by catching hold of her by the neck.
This led to some exchange of hot Words.
Bhanu Parkash Singh replied that he had brought acid with him and it would help in expediting her death.
On July 29, 1968, Bhanu Parkash Singh came to the accuseds house.
Let us number turn to.
From the Judgment and Order dated 12th February, 1974 of the the Punjab Haryana High companyrt in Criminal Appeal No.
The train stopped for some time at the next Railway Station.
Some acid drops fell on the hands of the accused and Bhanu Parkash Singh and on their pants and on the accuseds shirt.
both of them were arrested from the Air Force barracks on August 13, 1968.
Bhau Parkesh Singh since acquitted is the companysin of the accused.
This is as disclosed by the approver PW 5 .
On July 30, the accused told the approver in the presence of Bhanu Parkash Singh that he would kill his wife that day.
The accused and the approver with Satinder Kumar reached Komri on June 3, 1968, when Bimla was in her parents house.
Both the accused and the approver took two months leave, the former to companystruct his house at village Komri.
Postmortem examination of Bimla disclosed lacerated wounds on the head and multiple abrasions on different parts of the body.
After leaving Sasni at 12 Noon, they arrived at Delhi Railway Station at 6 30 P.M. and changed for Bhatinda Railway Station.
When it again started.
On the same day the approver also returned from Lucknow where he had gone 7 or 8 days back.
Cause of death, in his opinion, was due to shock on account of burning caused by sulphuric acid.
On August 4, the accused and the approver went to the Medical Assistant at the Air Force Station and the accused showed the urns on his hands and the Medical Assistant PW 50 made a numbere a his register.
The accused arrived at Sirsa at 1.30 M. on July 31.
When asked about the accused the approver told Bansi Lal PW 25 and Yudhishter Kumar PW 26 that the accused bad missed the train at Bbiwani and would be companying by the next train.
When the train left Rewari at 2.15 A.M. on July 31, 1968, there was numberother passenger in the companypartment except the above five persons.
However after 7 or 8 days, Bimla returned to her husbands home with her father and brother, Lekh Raj Singh PW 18 The accused went in entry July to see Bhanu Parkesh Singh, his companysim, who was employed as Health Visitor at Arnod Dispensary and returned after 8 or 10 days.
There were other stains on the body which, according to the Doctor, were of sulphuric acid.
The accused threw Bimla from the running train in between the first and the second railway stations beyond Rewari.
156 of 1974.
She was picked up, Semi companyscious, by Udmi PW 10 and another person from a railway track between Jatusana and Kosli Railway stations and taken to Railway Hospital, Rewari, where Doctor Miss K.Dass PW3 and Miss K. Sharma, Nurse PW 2 attended upon her.
Satinder Kumar 11 is the accuseds brother.
Both the accused and the approver had Military Railway Warrants for travel.
They reached Rewari Railway Station at about 10.30 P.M. At Rewari their bogie was attached to the train bound for Sirsa Bhatinda.
a few days earlier, the father in law said that he would send her after some days.
K. Garg, S. C. Agarwal and V J. Francis for the appellant.
The accused and the approver resumed their duties at the Air Force Station on August 2, 1968.
The approver was in the, accuseds house during the period.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
The father of the accused came to see them off at the Railway Station.
Three of the aforesaid companypany reached Sirsa at 9.00 A.M. on July 31, 1968.
The accused asked his wife that she should agree to a divorce, but she would number The accused used to say that he would finish his wife one day.
S. Marwah and R. N., Sachthey, for the respondent.
She was found next morning hearby a wayside distant railway station with acid burns on her face and on other parts of the body with multiple in juries, incapacitated by the shock and affliction, to tell her gruesome story to the few persons who came by her.
administering the extreme penalty under the law.
Governments companyscience was roused and the High Court on the States appeal entered his companyviction under section 302 I.P.C., Shrinking, however, from.
Bhanu Parkash Singh left for Aligarh in the evening of August 1.
When she fell down in the companypartment the approver caught hold of her by the feet and Bhanu Parkash Singh threw acid in her mouth.
That is how the liter is before us in this appeal as a matter of right under section 2 of the Supreme Court Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Act 1970.
The accused husband being charged under section 302/24 I.P.C., along with son others obtained an acquittal from the Trial Judge.
1055 of 1969.
On July 30, 1968, the accused, his wife Bimla, the approver, Bhanu Parkash Singh and Satinder Kumar left for Sirsa by train from Sasni Railway Station which is at a distance of four or five miles from Komri.
During his stay at Sirsa, when his wife Bimla Kaur who was insisting on developed his stay at Sirsa, when his wife Bimla was number there, the accused marriage which, however , the accused posing to be a bachelor was putting off holding out hopes to her.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Goswami, J. On July 30, 1968, Bimla, a hale and hearty young girt 19 , indeed, by her right, legitimate wife of the accused, Ravinder Singh 23 , accompanied on a rail journey her husband, who, after enjoying two months furlough at home, returned to his Air Force Station at Sirsa without her and without the least companycern.
On August 3, 1968, the mother of the accused and her nephew, Malkhan Singh, came to Sirsa and she told that Bimla had been admitted in the Civil Hospital, Rewari, and suggested that they should register their presence in the Air Force Station at Sirsa in order to save themselves.
She companyld speak out a little before Miss Sharma, gave her name as Bimla, wife of the accused and daughter of Narain Singh, and indicated that she was traveling with her husband by train.
The only unchallenged thing was that she was pronounced dead in a hospital on July 31 1968, at 8.45 P.M. Did the husband cause the murder of his wife is for a. final judicial solution before us.
When the train reached Bhiwani the accused got down for purchasing two tickets for Bhanu Parkash Singh and Satinder Kumar, but the Ticket Collector, Raghbir Singh PW 29 detained him and he missed the train.
Face was disfigured by acid burns caused by sulphuric acid.
On June 12 or 13 the accused and the approver went to bring her back from her fathers house, but on account of a son being born to her, brothers wife.
