During the pendency of the writ petition, the appellants, claiming to be the tenants under the inamdar got themselves impleaded as respondents 2 to 31 to the writ petition.
Komarapalayam was one of the 12 hamlets.
During the enquiry by the Inam Commission, it was found that the inam was enjoyed in 110 vrittia however only persons holding 90 vritties appeared and filed statements and there was numberclaim for about 29 vritties.
Presumably, the grant was the result of a companysideration paid by the grantees and was number really attributable to any benefaction by the ruler.
A 1 it appears that in the year 1760, Krishna Raja Udayar, the Rajah of Mysore granted the village of Jagadapady or Nattapatti, together with 12 hamlets to certain Brahmins.
The grant, however, was number by way of gift of either the land or any portion of the assessment thereon.
A number of Brahmins subscribed the companylected a sum of Rs.
When Tippu Sultan came to power, the resumed six of the 12 hamlets, allowing the successors of the original grantees to remain in possession of the rest without any obligation to pay any rent on that portion of the village.
50,000/ Rajagopala Pagodas.
Four of them who represented the others as well paid the amount into the treasury obtained a grant of Jagadapady the 12 hamlets were given rent free from the ruler.
Mathew, J. The second respondent filed a writ petition before the High Court of Madras challenging the validity of a numberification issued by the State Government under Section 3 of the Madras Inam Estates Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari Act, 1963 Act 26 of 1963 , on the ground that Komarapalayam, Agraharam.
