Dipa Chatterjee Anr.
The said order is under challenge in this appeal.Thus, the application filed on 16th August, 2000 is companysigned.
The matter must rest on the order as recorded on 25th November, 97.
Considering the said application, another Division Bench passed the order dated 6th November, 2000, as quoted earlier.
The appellant is the husband of respondent number1 .
Thereafter, it appears that the respondent number1 having failed to restore custody of the child to him, the appellant filed an application before the High Court seeking implementation of the order of the Family Court, Dhanbad giving custody of the child to him.
LPA No.358/97 R was decided by the judgment rendered by a Division Bench on 4th May, 2000.
The Court is also companyscious of the order which was passed by a Bench presided over by Honble Mr.Justice Narayan Roy and Honble Mr.Justice M.Y.Eqbal on 25th November, 1997.
The Court has also seen the record of the present letters patent appeal.
P.Mohapatra, J. Leave granted.
We have heard the petitioner Shri Bimlendu Kumar Chatterjee, who appeared in person and learned companynsel appearing for the respondents.
This appeal is directed against the order passed by a Division Bench of the Ranchi Bench of Patna High Court on 6th November, 2000 in LPA 358/97 R titled Bimlendu Kumar Chatterjee vs. Smt.
Relevant portion of the order reads thus The Court heard this matter for some time.
