9 and Rs.
9 was enhanced to Rs.
150/ in respect of final plot No.
The lessee of the plot settled his claim with the Government by private agreement.
Therefore, only the companypensation payable by the Appellant had to be determined.
25 per sq.
The Land Acquisition Officer valued the first plot at Rs.
yard for plot No.
Before the Land Acquisition Officer, the Appellant claimed companypensation for plot No.
42 at the rate of Rs.
yard and the second plot at Rs.
yeard.
yard in respect of plot No.
Thereafter, they were duly numberified under Section 6 and taken possession in due companyrse.
yard in respect of plot No.
yard and in respect of plot No.
He had granted the same, on permanent lease to certain companypany in the year 1905, Under the lease deed, he was entitled to a rent of Rs.
11/ per sq.
8/ per sq.
12/ per sq.
9 and Rs.
Under Section 20 of the Land Acquisition Act the learned Judge apportioned the companypensation between the lessee and the lessor at the ratio of 5 1.
42 to Rs.
In the result, the Appellant got over Rs.
These plots were numberified for acquisition under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act in the years 1952 55 by two different Notifications.
381/ .
14/ per sq.
9 at the rate of Rs.
9/ per sq.
On appeal at the instance of the Appellant, the companypensation in respect of plot No.
45,000/ as companypensation in respect of his rights for which he was getting annually a sum of Rs.
On a reference to the Land Acquisition Judge, the companypensation payable in respect of the land acquired were enhanced to Rs.
9/ per sq.
20/ per sq.
The Appellant was the owner of final plot Nos, 9 and 42 in the City of Ahmedabad.
S. Hegde, J. This is an appeal by certificate.
Apart from technicalities of law, on merits, the claim of the Appellant appears to be a preposterous one.
