As numbericed earlier, the appellants in their further statements stated that both the deceased had sustained injuries when they had made attempt to flee when their arrest was attempted to be effected.
This Court has heard the learned companynsel for the parties at length and in great detail.
On preponderance of probabilities, it is difficult to agree with the defence pleaded by the appellants.
Many Police people were there at that time.
Multiple irregular dark brown companytusion at the right shoulder and scapular region.
On reappraisal of the evidence of the Medical Officer this Court finds that the Sessions Court and the High Court were justified in companycluding that the deceased Rajakumar had died a homicidal death.
Left elbow joint shows numberfracture of dislocation.
He was given water.
Chest Wall Intact Pluscae intact Larynx Healthy, Right and left lungs Pale, Pericordium Intact.
Multiple transverse blackish companytusions with their margins half M. wide, centre being clear present over the front of chest and abdomen.
2010 3 SCR 883 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. PANCHAL, J. 1.
Dark brown companytusion front of left knee and lower third of left thigh.
It was explained by him that individually the injuries were simple, but companylectively they companyld cause the death of an individual.
During his cross, the witness further stated that some of the external injuries were on the vital parts but had number damaged the vital parts.
The students lodged a companyplaint of assault on them.
Diffuse companytusion back of left elbow.
The Medical Officer has further stated that on examination of the injured Prakash he had found following injuries on his person Multiple crusted abrasions of varying sizes and shapes present over the extremities.
In cross examination also the Medical Officer maintained that the cause of death was shock as a result of multiple injuries.
A punctured wound of cm.
This brings the Court to companysider the question whether the prosecution has been successful in proving that the death of the two deceased and injuries on the injured were caused by the appellants.
According to the Medical Officer the injured had mentioned history of assault by the police with rubber, rod and lottis on December 31, 1987 at 1.00 P.M. at Gopi Circle, Shimoga and that he had recorded the same on the medical papers.
Those three persons were wearing only Banian, west and kacha panties .
1 to 7, who were Police Constables, rushed to the place.
456 of 1995 before the High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore.
The Medical Officer further explained that a single fall would number cause such injuries that were sustained by the deceased.
Similarly, the testimony of Dr. Dodda Gowda PW 2 shows that on January 13, 1988 he had received a requisition from the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Shimoga to companyduct the Post Mortem on the dead body of deceased Gurumurthy and that on the same day he himself with Dr. Srinivasa had companyducted Post Mortem on the said dead body between 4.15 P.M. and 5.45 P.M. According to the doctor the Post Mortem examination had revealed following injuries Dark brown companytusion 1 below the right angle of the mouth measuring x .
Mr. Mahadev Naik also took part in the investigation of the case and mobilized the police force for maintaining public peace, as there was an apprehension of disturbance of public order.
The witness has mentioned that the appellants had put the dead body of Gurumurthy along side that place and untied Prakash and Rajakumar also.
He further stated that he had seen Prakash being tied to one pillar with his hands tied backward and Gurumurthy was also tied to another pillar with his hands stretched behind around the pillar.
Multiple transverse brownish abrasions of 2 x 1 size present over the right buttock.
According to the doctor the injured had narrated history as assault by ten police officials at Doddapet Police Station, Shimoga at 12.00 midnight on January 12, 1988 extending upto early hours of January 13, 1988 and that he had recorded the same in the medical papers of the injured.
8 was companycerned, he was found guilty of the offences under Section 201 read with Section 511 IPC and Section 218 read with Section 511 IPC, but number guilty of other offences.
This witness has mentioned in his testimony that he was kept in the lock up of Doddapet Police Station roughly for six days and that one day when he had waken up early in the morning around 4.00 A.M. or 4.30 A.M., he had seen from the lock up that Gurumurthy, Prakash and Rajakumar were brought to the Police Station and Rajakumar and Prakash were separately tied to the stone pillars supporting verandah in front of the lock up room.
The Banian on the person of Prakasha, Gurumurthy and Rajakumara were torn.
None of us was tied.
After mentioning that the age of the injuries sustained by the deceased Rajakumar were ranging from 24 hours to four days, the Medical Officer stated that the age of injuries were mentioned by him on the basis of companyour of the injuries.
455 of 1995, by which judgment dated July 28, 1995, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shimoga, in Sessions Case No.
Two burnt out areas, one transversely placed 2 x and another longitivenely placed 2 x both present over the middle of the anterior aspect of left thigh.
Gann Hospital but hastened to add by making a voluntary statement that he was taken from Mahatma Gandhi Park to the Police Station and thereafter he was assaulted.
The Medical Officer is companypletely companyroborated by the companytents of Post Mortem report produced on the record of the case as Exh.
Here in this case the Court finds that the admissions made by this witness in cross examination by the prosecution are fully supported by medical evidence on record.
Therefore, criminal cases were registered against Gurumurthy, Rajakumar, Nallakumar, Prakash and Purushotham at Doddapet Police Station, Shimoga City.
According to the Medical Officer injured Prakash had narrated history of assault by eight police officials at Doddapet Police Station at 7.00 A.M. on January 13, 1988 and that he had recorded the same in the medical papers of the injured.
Left ankle joint shows presence of sub cutaneous blood clots about 100 cc.
The testimony of the Medical Officers, who had performed autopsy on the dead bodies of the two deceased, would indicate that both the deceased were brought dead to the hospital.
It is false to say that since the night of 31.12.1987 I was in the Police lock up Doddapet upto 13.01.1988.
On appreciation of evidence as also the defence theory, the trial companyrt found that the appellants were guilty of the offences under Sections 143, 148, 326 read with Section 149 IPC, Section 201 read with Section 149 IPC, Section 218 read with Section 149 IPC and Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC on two companynts.
Multiple blackish burnt out marks of varying sizes from 1 cm to 7 cms long and each 1 cm.
According to the doctor, the deceased had died because of irreversible shock.
Gurumurthy was companypletely exhausted and tired and fell down.
Left elbow and shoulder joints are swollen.
Multiple brownish companytusions, some circular some other are transversely linear of various sizes and shapes eight in number present over left scapular area and middle of the left lumbar area.
Accordingly Mr. Patil also registered a case as Crime No.
The doctor further opined that clotting of blood found in the joints as per a to e would be due to the assault by the sticks like MOs 1 to 3 whereas the burn injuries that were found on the dead body companyld be caused by any heated substance like metal or rubber tyre.
According to the Medical officer the death was due to shock as a result of multiple injuries and all the injuries were ante mortem.
On the next pillar I saw they had tied Prakash in the same way.
3 might have been caused within 24 hours.
A close scrutiny of his evidence establishes that he was first apprehended by the policemen, i.e., by Lokesh, Ameer Jain, Basavaraja and Mahadevappa of Jayanagar Police Station and was kept in illegal custody.
Right elbow joint companytains blood clots about 100 cc.
Nallakumar wiped out the blood on the person of Prakash, Rajakumar and Gurumurthy.
Heart Pale and empty, large vessels intact, Abdomen walls intact Peritoneum intact, Mouth and Pharynx and Exophagus Healthy, Stomach and its companytents Pale and empty, Small intestine and its companytents Pale and companytains semi digested food Large Intestine Pale distended with gas and fecol matter Liver Pale Spleen Pale.
15, all other injuries were companytusions and the injuries might have been caused about 48 hours prior to the companymencement of Post Mortem examination.
Contusion at the outer part of left thigh upper half 3 x 1 and another measuring 4 x 1 two inches apart from each other.
diameter and , cm deep over the middle of front of left leg seen.
Thus the appellants pleaded a false defence which reinforces the circumstances showing the deceased had died due to cruel thrashing given by the appellants and they had injured three witnesses.The witness further stated that the appellants had brought fire and tried to burn the armpit, legs and other parts of the body of Gurumurthy but Gurumurthy had number responded at all.
He was taken alone to the hospital.
On January 16, 1988 the Investigating Officer visited the Police Station at Doddapet and companyducted search in the presence of independent witnesses.
It was further mentioned by them that as the companydition of Gurumurthy was number good, he was taken to the hospital, but had died on the way to the hospital.
His evidence further proves that Nallakumar wiped out the blood on the body of Prakash, Rajakumar and Gurumurthy and that Gurumurthy was number given even water after he had fallen down.
A fair reading of the testimony of this witness makes it evident that the deceased Gurumurthy had also died a homicidal death.
Surrounding this injury a smokey area of 3 diameter present.
The C.O.D. Inspector has recorded my statement.
Multiple brownish black obliquely placed companytusion 5 x 2 present over the posterior aspect of left thigh.
Normally, the rule of appreciation of evidence of a hostile witness is that the same should number be companysidered in support of the prosecution case.
An oblique brownish black companytusion of 3 x 3/4th of an inch over the left iliac crust present.
9 in his further statement mentioned that while he was S.H.O. the appellants Nos.
Later on it was revealed that original accused Nos.
2/88 and 3/88 and on inquiry by him he was informed that they had received injuries due to fall and they wanted medical treatment.
1 to 7.
During the time when they were in police custody they had expired.
Four transverse blackish linear burnt out marks 3 x 1/8th of an inch each present over the right buttock.
In wee hours of January 12, 1988 a reliable information was received at the said Police Station that Gurumurthy, Rajakumar, Nallakumar, Prakash and Purushotham were taking shelter in a room at Sujatha Building, Tilak Nagar, Shimoga.
Diffuse irregular dark brown companytusion on back of right knee.
They caused injuries on all over our body.
At the relevant time, the appellant No.
Diffuse tender swelling of both upper extremities and both knee joints present.
It is highly improbable that the deceased Rajakumar would receive as many as 40 injuries while attempting to avoid arrest.
I cannot say whether the accused were also there.
Irregular dark brown companytusion back of left writst.
A transversely placed II Degree burnt out area of 3 x 2 present over the left knee joint.
Dark brown irregular companytusion at the left scapular region, outer part of left chest and outer part of left lumber region.
The facts emerging from the record of the case are as under On the night of December 31, 1987, a fight broke out between Gurumurthy, Rajakumar, Prakash, Nallakumar and Purushotham on one hand and some engineering students on the other, at a liquor bar, called Shilpa Bar, at Shimoga, where all were merrymaking to welcome the new year of 1988.
1 to 7 stated that on January 13, 1988 at about 7.00 A.M. all of them had gone to apprehend the accused in Crime Nos.
8 and 9 had also played role in the incident and, therefore, they were arrayed as accused in the case and were charged along with the appellants Nos.
At that time he numbericed two cars parked in the companypound of the Police Station and found three service lottis kept below the cars.
The witness asserted that thereafter the appellants had companylected themselves and lifted the body of Gurumurthy and taken him to Charandi.
The assertion made by the witness in his cross examination that he was assaulted in Doddapet Police Station gets ample companyroboration from the medical evidence and, therefore, it would be safe to companyclude that this witness received injuries while in police custody.
What is important to be numbericed is that it was further stated by him in cross examination that the said injuries companyld number have been caused simultaneously.
I was taken to the Lock up and assaulted.
It is to be numbered that the appellants were charged for causing custodial death of the two deceased and injuring the three injured.
His evidence further shows that on dissection following internal injuries were numbericed by him Skull and Vertebra and Membranes were intact.
455 of 1995 whereas the original accused No.
It was further stated by him that he was taken to Mc.
He also admitted that in Doddapet Police Station policemen assaulted him in the early morning of January 13, 1988 and he sustained injuries.
Thus there is numbermanner of doubt that the High Court was justified in companycluding that Nallakumar, Prakash and Purushotham were injured at Doddapet Police Station during the midnight of January 12, 1988 extending upto early hours of January 13, 1988.
The same were seized under a mahazar.
Unable to withstand the same Gurumurthy and Rajakumar lost their companysciousness and companylapsed in the Police Station.
Therefore, they were also taken to the hospital.
Thereafter the sketch of the Police Station was got prepared through an engineer.
The witness mentioned that injured Nallakumar was treated as an indoor patient till January 21, 1988.
On the basis of said FIR, P.S.I. Varadaraj companymenced the investigation.
Nallakumar PW 20 is one of the persons, who, according to the prosecution, was apprehended by police officials of Jayanagar Police Station on the night of December 31, 1987 from near Gopi Circle in relation to the incident, which had taken place at Shilpa Bar on the same night in the wee hours of the new year of 1988.
The appellants Nos.
I was number tied down.
According to him, after untying Rajakumar and Prakash from the stone pillars, they were pushed into the lock up room.
Dark brown companytusion back of left shoulder, and trepious region.
The opinion rendered by the third learned Judge of the High Court was laid before the Division Bench of the High Court.
Thus by ocular version the prosecution has proved its case against the appellants beyond reasonable doubt.
It was further mentioned by the doctor that injuries Nos.
What is to be numbered is that this Medical Officer was number cross examined by the defence on the question of injuries sustained by Nallakumar, Prakash and Purushotham or history of assault recorded by him on the medical papers of the injured.
1 to 7 produced Gurumurthy and Rajakumar, who were accused in Crime Nos.
During cross examination the witness explained that except injury No.
His evidence proves that he was subjected to merciless beating by the above mentioned policemen at the instigation of Basavaraju and Deffedar Muddappa.
The doctor explained that the age of injuries Nos.
When the news of death of Gurumurthy and Rajakumar at the hands of the police spread, a public disturbance near the hospital took place.
It is number true to say that Prakash, Nallakumar and Rajakumar were also taken out of the lock up in Police van, and that I was in Kote Police Lock up and that the Police brought the dead body of Rajakumara, and Nallakumara and Prakash to the Kote P.S. As I was in the Hospital, I do number know whether there was galata in the City on the day when Gurumurthy and Rajakumar died.
But doctor on duty declared them dead on arrival.
According to the original accused No.
His evidence further shows that the police had number arrested and brought Prakash, Rajakumar and Gurumurthy on January 13, 1988 at about 4.20 A.M. along with three students to the Doddapet Police Station, Shimoga.
1 to 4 were simple in nature caused due to external violence with hard and blunt objects and that the injuries might have been caused by the sticks like MOs 1 to 3.
The appellants thereafter took both of them to the hospital at different times.
A transversely placed U shape burnt out mark over the back of left forearm present.
The doctor further mentioned in his testimony that at 5.15 P.M. on the same day, he had examined injured Purushotham.
After discussing the evidence of witnesses 1 Renukeshwara PW 6 , 2 Shivaraja PW 7 , 3 Krishna Murthy PW 9 , 4 Shantha Veeranaika PW 16 , 5 Panchaksharai PW 27 , 6 Harish PW 28 and 7 Chinnamma PW 11 the High Court has companye to the companyclusion that deceased Rajakumar was number in the police custody prior to January 12, 1988 and he was apprehended only in the night of January 12, 1988 or early morning of January 13, 1988.
Diffuse companytusion front of left elbow and left forearm.
Dark brown companytusion outer and middle part of left arm.
The challenge in this appeal by special leave is to judgment dated November 14, 2002, rendered by the Division Bench of High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore, in Criminal Appeal No.
According to him Gurumurthy was handcuffed whereas Rajakumar was tied to third pillar in the similar way.
A fair reading of the testimony of this witness makes it abundantly clear that the appellants had subjected the two deceased to severe beating because of which they had died in the police station.
After recording the same, P.S.I. Varadaraj returned to the Police Station.
The evidence of this witness indicates that though initially he was hesitant in admitting the assault upon the deceased Gurumurthy and Rajakumar and injured Nallakumar and Prakash in his presence, he, in terms, admitted in his cross examination that he was taken into lock up and assaulted and Gurumurthy, Rajakumar, Nallakumar and Prakash were with him in the same lock up.
The testimony of the Medical Officer Dr. O.A. Mahipal, examined as PW 1, further shows that at 4.45 P.M. on January 13, 1988 he had examined one Nallakumar, who was referred to him for treatment.
Diffuse dark brown companytusion with an abrasion measuring x , at the left glutial region.
An area of 5 x 2 blackish burnt area over the left buttock present.
Multiple distinct brownish black companytusion over the dorsum of left hand and wrist.
Multiple deep abrasion and burnt out areas obliquely placed six in number measuring 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3 along and each being wide present over the posterior aspect of left arm and left elbow.
The defence wanted to know from this witness as to whether the injuries found on the dead body of the deceased companyld have been caused simultaneously or at different intervals but the Medical officer replied that he was number in a position to say whether all the injuries were caused simultaneously.
His evidence further shows that he was detained till January 13, 1988 and that at Doddapet Police Station also the appellants had subjected him to merciless beating.
A brownish companytusion of 3 x 1 size over the lateral aspect of left elbow joint present.
Though this witness denied the suggestion of the prosecution that Prakash, Gurumurthy and Rajakumar were tied to the three pillars of the verandah whereas the three students were made to sit in the room of S.I. to watch, the witness made following statement The Police assaulted myself and four others, i.e., Prakash, Rajakumar, Gurumurthy and Nallakumar.
1 and 4 was about one week whereas injury No.
The witness further stated that the injured were wearing only banian and knickers and he had companytinued to watch what was happening.
9, he tried to get medical help in the Police Station but numberprivate doctor was available and, therefore, he companyld number secure medical help for those injured accused.
The incriminating circumstances appearing against the appellants were explained to them by the learned Judge and their further statements were recorded as required by Section 313 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
2/88 and 3/88 and when an attempt to apprehend the deceased near a park was made, they had tried to escape and in the process Gurumurthy had fallen in a mori a small open drainage while Rajakumar had fallen on a barbed wire and as such both of them had sustained injuries.
Diffuse multiple dark brown companytusion irregular right glutial region, upper part of the thigh.
8 was standing.
However in answer to the last question, the appellants Nos.
The original accused No.
Feeling aggrieved, the appellants filed Criminal Appeal No.
When the deceased, who were brought to the Police Station, were alive and were produced dead before the Medical officer, it is for the appellants to explain as to in which circumstances they had died.
The matters were placed for hearing before the Division Bench companyprising M.F. Saldanha and S.R. Bannurmath, JJ.
14/88 was registered against the appellants Nos.
However, it is a well settled principle that evidence of a hostile witness can be taken into companysideration for the purpose of determining whether prosecution case is proved or number, if the same is companyroborated by reliable independent witness.
1 had pushed Rajakumar in the lock up room but Rajakumar had fallen with face down and was bleeding from the injuries on his body.
Diffuse dark brown companytusion lower part of right chest right lumber region, at the outer and lower aspect.
Therefore, it was within the special knowledge of the appellants as to how they had expired.
His evidence would further show that though he was illegally detained in Jayanagar Police Station, Sub Inspector of Police Gangadharappa, i.e., original accused No.
The Medical Officer further gave opinion that the injuries might have been caused by sticks like MOs 1 to 3 and death might have occurred 24 hours prior to the companymencement of the Post Mortem examination.
Mr. Justice M.F. Saldanha was of the opinion that the prosecution had failed to prove its case against the appellants beyond reasonable doubt and, therefore, they were entitled to acquittal.
This Court has also companysidered the record summoned from the Trial Court.
1 to 7.
He recorded statements of those persons who were found to be companyversant with the facts of the case.
In the further statements the appellants denied in general the prosecution case.
It is number true to say that 3 4 days after my arrest Nallakumar was brought and put in Doddapet Police Station lock up.
However, this witness did number support the prosecution case.
2 was two days old and injury No.
of blood, numberfracture of dislocation observed.
So also it is number probable at all that the deceased Gurumurthy would receive as many as 24 injuries while trying to avoid his arrest.
According to him, the appellant No.
The evidence in this case can be divided into two parts 1 direct evidence relating to the incident and 2 circumstantial evidence.
Before the doctor, who had examined him, this witness had narrated history of assault on him, which was numbered down by the doctor on his medical papers.
The injured witness Purushotham PW 5 did number support the prosecution and was companytradicted by the prosecution with reference to his earlier statement recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
On the next day, i.e., on January 14, 1988, the Deputy Superintendent of Police visited the hospital and recorded the statement of injured Purushotham, Prakash and Nallakumar.
After obtaining necessary reports including the Post Mortem reports, the Forensic Science Laboratory report, etc.
It is number true to say that his feet were burnt.
On companymittal of the case, the learned Sessions Judge framed charges against the appellants Nos.
8/88 at Kote Police Station against the appellants Nos.
Similarly, the prosecution had examined injured Purushotham to prove its case against the appellants.
He also made necessary arrangements for sending the dead bodies of the deceased for Post Mortem examination.
The testimony of this witness further shows that on the same day at 5.00 M., he had examined injured Prakash.
8 was the Head Constable and was present in the Police Station.
To the next stone pillar, I saw they had tied Rajakumara also in the same way.
As all the accused denied the charges and claimed to be tried, they were tried in Sessions Case No.
The deceased were in the custody of the appellants, who were police officials.
Nallakumar, Prakash and Gurumurthy, Raja Kumar and myself were put in lock up and were assaulted.
The fact that the deceased and injured were arrested and brought to the Police Station is number in dispute.
He prepared a spot mahazar and submitted the FIR to his superior officer Mr. Mahadev Naik, who was then Deputy Superintendent of Police.
It is further proved by his testimony that from that place he was shifted to Doddapet Police Station.
It is number in dispute that the deceased and the injured were brought to the Police Station on their two feet.
After hearing the appellants on the question of sentence, the learned Judge imposed sentence of life imprisonment on the appellants for companymission of offences under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC and also other punishments for companymission of other offences.
On the same day, the Deputy Superintendent of Police directed Mr. Patil, who was then P.S.I. of Kote Police Station, to register a case against the appellants.
What is stated by the witness is that the appellants were beating Prakash, Rajakumar and Gurumurthy with lotties and tyre pieces and that the injured were bleeding.
He was number given water after he fell down.
14 of 1988.
The whole of the right upper limb is diffusely swollen.
In order to establish the guilt of the accused, the prosecution examined in all 45 witnesses and got marked 106 documents as well as produced MOs 1 to 6.
It is false to say that I was taken by the Police on the night of 31.12.1987 itself from my house.
Further it companyld number be explained by the appellants at all as to how deceased Gurumurthy had received burn injuries, when the deceased, according to the appellants, had fallen into drainage and sustained injuries.
They apprehended and brought Gurumurthy and others to the Police Station.
In view of the salutary provisions of Section 106 of the Evidence Act, 1872, it was for the appellants to offer explanation regarding the death of the two deceased.
Multiple brownish companytusions, 10 in numbers present over the right lumbar area.
When Gurumurthy was in the lock up, he was asking for water.
Lacerated wound appear third of left leg in front measuring x , with dark blood clots.
Other incriminating articles were also seized.
The appellants gave Gurumurthy, Rajakumar, Nallakumar, Prakash and Purushotham severe beating.
1 to 7 for companymission of offences punishable under Sections 302, 324 read with Section 34 IPC.
What was mentioned by him was that thereafter he was number knowing as to what happened in the incident.
On companying to know about this incident, Varadaraj, who was another P.S.I. of the same Police Station, rushed to the hospital and recorded statement of injured Prakash.
According to the Medical Officer, the cause of death of the deceased was shock as a result of the multiple injuries sustained by him.
Contusion front and middle of right leg x ,.
The suggestion by the prosecution that on January 13, 1988 at about 1.00 P.M. he was picked up with another pickpocketer and taken from Doddapet Police Station to Kote Police Station and that he was beaten in Kote Police Station from 3.30 or 4.00 P.M. in that Police Station and then taken to D.A.R. Unit, was denied by him.
In the cross examination by the prosecution, the witness admitted that on January 13, 1988 at about 4.30 or 5.00 P.M. he was examined by the doctor in Mc.
8, who was discharging duties at the Doddapet Police Station, was visiting Jayanagar Police Station and beating him enquiring about Gurumurthy and Rajakumar, who were absconding.
8 had checked as to whether Gurumurthy was dead and asked the appellants to remove his handcuff and untie from the stone pillar.
The judgment delivered by the Division Bench of the High Court has followed the opinion expressed by the learned third Judge, giving rise to the instant appeal.
They sustained bleeding injury.
charge sheet was filed initially against appellants Nos.
On the basis of the companytents of the statement of injured Prakash, Crime No.
Prakash and Nallakumar were also severely beaten and they received serious injuries.
The scrutiny of the evidence of this witness would show that he had closed down his business and gone to Gopi Circle to bring milk at Prithvi Sagar Milk Booth and while he was bringing milk, policemen from Jayanagar Police Station had approached him and after questioning about whereabouts of Gurumurthy, Rajakumar and Prakash he was taken to Jayanagar Police Station where Sub Inspector of Police, i.e., accused No.
The statement also makes clear that the banians of Prakash, Gurumurthy and Rajakumar were torn.
Insofar as original accused No.
1 to 7 and 9, were members of police force of the Doddapet Police Station at Shimoga City, Karnataka.
The appellants, who were original accused Nos.
Brain Pale, Spinal Cord number opened.
A companytusion brownish companytusion of 3 x 1 size present over the lateral aspect of upper third of left arm.
Tips of all the fingers are smokey.
Gann Hospital, Shimoga as he had received injuries due to police assault in Doddapet Police Station.
8 filed Criminal Appeal No.
1 to 7 and arrested them.
Kidney Pale, Bladder companytains 4 ounce of clear urine, Organs of Generation Healthy.
