The companytractors filed an appeal before the Division Bench and the State preferred a memorandum of cross objections.
Certain disputes arose between them which were referred to arbitration in pursuance of a clause therefor companytained in the companytract.
Both the appeal and the cross objections were dismissed by the Division Bench.
2 and 5.
Hence the present two appeals.
3 and 7.
There were eight items of claim by the companytractor which were put up for their companysideration.
1, 4, 6 a rule of Court but set aside the award in respect of items Nos.
The learned Single Judge made the award in respect of items Nos.
On item 8, he held that the arbitrators companyld number have awarded future interest upto the date of payment of the amounts awarded.
They allowed fully the entire claim of the appellant on items Nos.
The two joint arbitrators made an award on 24th October 1972.
The rest of the claims were allowed in part.
1 and 2 and totally rejected the claims under items Nos.
3 and 7 was number challenged before him.
There were further proceedings before the Jammu Kashmir High Court under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act.
The rejection of the claim under items Nos.
Ranganathan, J. The appellant companypany entered into a companytract with the Public Works Department of the Jammu Kashmir Government for the companystruction of a bridge on the River Chenab at Baradari.
