Therefore, the decree for eviction was passed against the tenant.
Against the said judgment and decree, the tenant filed an appeal being Civil Appeal No.
180 of 1980 setting aside the judgment and decree for possession passed by the Trial Court in H.R.P. Civil Suit No.
Against the said Order, the landlady .came before, the High Court in revision.
This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and Order made on March 17, 1989 by the High Court of Gujarat in Civil Revision Application No.
218 of 1980 affirming the judgment of the Appellate Bench, Small Causes Court, Ahmedabad in Civil Appeal No.
180 of 1980 before the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court at Ahmedabad.
The Appellate Court allowed the appeal and set aside the decree for eviction on the sole ground that it would cause greater hardship to the tenant if he is evicted.
5076 of 1976 in the Court of Small Causes at Ahmedabad for ejectment of the tenant respondent for bona fide requirement as her husband was going to retire from service in Bombay, the appellant wanted to settle down in Ahmedabad with her widowed daughter and other members of her family.
Special leave granted.
Heard arguments.
The appellant filed the suit being H.R.P. Civil Suit No.
The Small Causes Court decreed the said suit holding that the landlady had proved her bona fide personal requirement of the suit premises and that she would experience hardship greater than the tenant if the decree was refused.
5076 of 1976.
