Not satisfied, the petitioner filed writ petition No.
150 5 175 6 205 E.B. 7 240.
In the year 1970 an order was made on January 28, 1970 by which he was purported to be reduced in rank to the post of Draftsman Grade Ill in the scale of Rs.
Shorn of all unnecessary detail, the relevant facts are these The petitioner was originally appointed as a Draftsman Grade II in the pay scale of Rs.
The petitioner then sought a review of the order on the special leave petition on two occasions and both the petitions for review were dismissed.
It is this order that is challenged in the present writ petition filed in 1978.
32 of 1977 in this Court and that was dismissed as withdrawn.
A Letters Patent Appeal was dismissed on December 3,1974 and the special leave petition filed against the judgment of the High Court was also dismissed by this Court.
194/70 and that writ petition was dismissed by the High Court on August 16,1974 by a learned Single Judge.
However, that was number done and Rule Nise was issued.
The present writ petition was filed thereafter.
What has been said so far by us was enough to have entailed the dismissal of the writ petition in limine.
205 7 240 8 280 in the year 1964.
The very order was challenged by this petitioner in the Delhi High Court by way of a writ petition Civil Writ Petition No.
Chinnappa Reddy, J. The facts, simple enough as they are, have been companyplicated by the voluminous record built up by the petitioner and the various interim orders passed by this Court from time to time.
