It is this stage the appellant herein filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Calcutta high Court for issuing a direction to the respondents herein to promote him to E 5 Grade and in the alternative to regularise his services in the said Grade.
2003 Supp 3 SCR 898 The following Order of the Court was delivered Bharat Coking Coal Limited in short the BCCL is a subsidiary companypany of Coal India Limited.
On 27th March, 1975, the appellant was appointed in BCCL as a Draftsman.
A learned Single Judge of the High Court was of the view that since the appellant herein was working on the post of E 5 Grade for the last 10 years, his services are liable to be regularised.
The respondents thereafter preferred a Letters Patent Appeal before the High Court and the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court, reversed the judgment of the learned Single Judge.
Consequently, the writ petition was allowed and the order to that effect was issued to the respondents.
The appellant was number subsequently promoted allegedly on the ground that he did number possess the requisite qualification.
It is against the said judgment, the appellant has companye in appeal before us.
After hearing the learned companynsel for the parties.
xxxx xxxx 9.3.
