I assure your goodself to remain disciplined in future.
The appellant, thereafter, filed the writ petition in the High Court which was also rejected by the Division Bench.
Services Conduct Rules, 1966.
The appellant was also selected for being promoted as Office Superintendent Grade II.
A junior to the appellant was favoured with the said posting and the appellant had protested against the favoured treatment and in the process he incurred the displeasure of his superior officers, particularly, respondent No.2.
Thus, he violated the Rule 31 i , ii and iii of Rly.
The charge sheet reads thus Article 1 That the said Shri Pritam Singh while functioning as OS II in time office on 31.08.1995 at 9.00 hrs.
The appellant, while working as Head Clerk in the Northern Railways was issued a Merit Certificate, wherein his work and companyduct had been highly companymended.
I am at the verge of retirement and request your goodself to companysider my case sympathetically.
1148/ PB/2002 which was rejected by the Tribunal holding that the punishment alone cannot be interfered with.
14.11.1995.
Workshop, ASR.
I feel sorry for the same.
Sd HARSH KUMAR Dy.
This act on the part of the appellant was viewed as a mis conduct and leakage of the official information.
The appellant, thereafter, approached the CAT, Chandigarh and filed O.A. No.
However, he was number given posting of the supervisory post.
Thanking you, Yours faithfully, Sd Dated 16.03.1996 PRITAM SINGH Supdt.
CME ASR Rly, Mech.
The appeal was rejected by respondent No.2.
This absentee statement was used by the employee in his petition filed against the Railways challenging the disciplinary action against him.
took the record of absence statement of tool room pertaining to 20.12.1993 from Shri O.P. Saini and leaked it out with the result the photocopy of absentee statement was attached by Shri Sewa Singh, Harjit Singh and Subeg Singh with their rejoinder to O.A. No.859/PB/95 filed in CAT CDG to be used against UOI leaking of absentee statement is a serious misconduct and speaks of doubtful integrity of Shri Pritam Singh.
Lakshmanan, J. Leave granted.
The appellant, by his appeal against the order of the respondent No.3 filed before respondent No.2, gave a detailed account of the revengeful measures practised by the respondent No.3 against him.
An enquiry was held against the appellant and a report was submitted holding the appellant guilty of leaking official documents.
The appellant, by his memo submitted to his higher officer, admitted the finding of guilt in respect of the charges made against him on 16.03.1996.
The said letter reads as follows DB CME ASR R Sir, Sub Findings of the enquiries officer against SF 5 Ref Your letter No.727 E/4531/DAR dated 02.03.1986 Since I have received the findings of the enquiry officer by proving me guilty of the charges.
The revision filed by the appellant was also rejected.
The said absentee statement was given by the appellant to the said employee.
I have numberhing to represent against this as such, I admit the charges.
One of the employees sought for the absentee statement of tool room shop from the appellant.
II DSC Shop Asstt.
On the basis of the enquiry report and the statement of the appellant, respondent No.3 passed an order of companypulsory retirement of the appellant.
It was also pointed out as to how five charge sheets were issued one after the another in the companyrse of 15 days against the appellant by using one O.P. Saini, the companyleague of the appellant against him.
The statement given by me during enquiry for denying the charges was number companyrect.
The short facts are as follows The appellant was appointed in the Northern Railways in Ministerial Service on 14.07.1965 and was due to retire on 31.05.2002.
10285/CAT/2003 wherein the High Court as dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant herein and companyfirmed the orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal imposing the punishment of companypulsory retirement.
Arising out of S.L.P. Civil No.
24665 OF 2003 Dr. AR.
Charge sheet was issued to the appellant alleging act of mis conduct against him.
The above appeal was filed against the impugned judgment and order dated 24.07.2003 passed by the High Court of Punjab Haryana at Chandigarh in Civil Writ Petition No.
Aggrieved against the same, the above special leave petition was filed.
