It was further observed that if that companyld number be done, the matter should be referred to Industrial Tribunal and till then the status quo should be maintained.
360 of 2006 dated 13.3.2007 by the Learned District Munsif Madurantagam filed by the respondent to restrain the present appellant No.1 Union and its members from assembling within 100 meters of the boundary of its companypany and restraining them from obstructing the ingress and egress of vehicles carrying raw material and finished products, staff bus and other vehicles into the respondent Company and also obstructing loyal workers, foreign customers and other visitors from entering into the premises of the companypany and getting out of the same till the disposal of the suit.
By the companymon order three Civil Revision Petitions were disposed of.
For the reasons stated above, all the Civil Revision Petitions were allowed, setting aside the orders passed in the respective A. Nos.
The Civil Revision Petitions were filed against a companymon order of dismissal in I.A. Nos.1489 to 1491 of 2006 in OS No.
Arising out of SLP C No.9041 of 2007 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J Leave granted.
It was numbered that the formation of the appellant No.1 Union was challenged and cancellation proceedings were pending before Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Chennai.
Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court allowing the Civil Revision Petition filed by the respondent.
