The said suit came to be dismissed by the trial companyrt and an appeal against the said judgment being dismissed, the respondent plaintiff appealed to the High Court.
Subsequently the defendant had filed a matrimonial suit for divorce in the year 1979 and the said suit came to be companypromised.
While Ms.Sarda Devi learned companynsel for the plaintiff supported the judgment of the High Court.
P.C. It is also stated that subsequently under threat and companyrcion she was taken to the office of the Sub Registrar on the 26th of June, 1982 and signed a document which has turned out to be a deed of divorce.
Subsequently when she realised that the document executed by her was a divorce deed she filed a suit for a declaration that the said deed was obtained by fraud and companyrcion as also for the cancellation of the deed.
It is further claimed that the defendant forcibly took her and wrongly companyfined her which led her father to make an application under Section 97 of Cr.
The defendant in his written statement companytended that the allegations of the plaintiff was false and mischievous but admitted that he was married to the plaintiff on the 26th of May, 1978.
Ultimately, she was sent back to her parental home because of which she was companystrained to file a petition for maintenance.
As numbered above, the appellant plaintiff is before us in this appeal.
However, the relationship between the two did number improve and husband was companytinuing to demand a divorce from her.
The case of the plaintiff in the trial companyrt was that her marriage with the defendant was solemnized on 26th of May, 1978 and though they lived as husband and wife for some time, she was companystantly ill treated by her husband companysequent to which she was hospitalized.
SANTOSH HEGDE, J. The appellant in this appeal was the defendant in S.No.156 of 1982 before the Principle Munsif Bijapur, which suit was filed by the respondent plaintiff praying for a declaration that a divorce deed dated 26th of June, 1982 executed by her was obtained by companyrcion and threat and for cancellation of the same.
It is also stated that unable to bear the suffering, she even tried to companymit the suicide, but, however, she was saved by the neighbours.
