Factual position is almost undisputed and it is unnecessary to set out the details.
The respondent No.1 Vijay Kumar hereinafter referred to as the employee was working as an Assistant Teacher in the school known as Montfort Senior Secondary School hereinafter referred to as the School .
The same was challenged in a writ petition filed before the Delhi High Court and a learned Single Judge by the impugned judgment upheld the view of the Tribunal and dismissed the writ petition.
Against the order of termination, an appeal was preferred before the Tribunal under Section 8 3 of the Act.
The present appellant filed an application under Section 8 1 of the Arbitration Act for reference to an arbitrator.
Disciplinary action was taken against him and by order dated 4.5.2000 the Managing Committee terminated his services.
WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.
In a nutshell the same is as follows Managing Committee of an un aided minority institution is the appellant.
5143/2005 ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court holding that the Delhi School Tribunal in short the Tribunal while hearing appeal of a dismissed employee of the appellant school preferred under Section 8 3 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 in short the Act was number required to refer the appeal to an arbitrator on an application being filed before it by the management of the school under Section 8 1 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in short the Arbitration Act is under challenge in this appeal.
