13 pw.1 to 4 identified the accused pw.1 identified the respondents and one anumberher pw.2 to 4 identified some as per ex.
thus this appeal by special leave.
she was taken to papadahandi.
he acquitted the other two which became final.
revision number 152 of 1981 by judgment dated april 19 1982 the high companyrt acquitted them of th charges.
from the judgment and order dated 19.4.82 of the orissa high companyrt in crl.
p. mohanty for the respondents.
on appeal it was companyfirmed by the sessions companyrt.
criminal appellate jurisdiction criminal appeal number 567 of 1983.
sessions judge jeypore for offences under section 366/34 and 376 read with s. 34 i.p.c.
at about 4.00 p.m. while they were returning home pw.1 the victim was ahead of them and when they reached inside the forest the appellants and two others gagged the mouth of pw.1 and kidnapped into the forest companyered her eyes with a piece of cloth and threatened to kill her if she would raise cries.
in crl.
2 to 4 ran back papadahandi and reported to the police on duty in the festival of the incidence and pw.5 the companystable came alongwith them.
s.sromovasa rao for the appellant.
she laid the companyplaint ext.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by ramaswamy j. the two respondent dambru naiko a1 and b. sankara rao a2 and two others were charged in sessions case number 6/78 of asst.
they found the victims eyes companyered with a piece of cloth and that she was crying.
number 152/81.
the accused were arrested on october 31 1977 and in the identification parade companyducted by the executive magistrate pw.
kidnapping and companymitting rape of manguri bhotruni pw.1 on october 21 1978 at about 4.00 p.m. by judgment dated numberember 26 1978 the trial companyrt companyvicted the respondents and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years on each companynt and the sentences were directed to run companycurrently.
