By the impugned judgement and order the High Court has dismissed the Revision Petition preferred by the appellant holding that the arrears of rent had number been paid or deposited by the appellant as required, in the manner companytemplated by Section 29 of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 hereinafter referred to as the Act before filing of the Revision Petition, and that 2/ 2 numberexplanation had been given for number depositing the rent before filing the Revision Petition under Section 50 1 of the Act.
The respondent landlords filed a petition for eviction of the appellant under Section 22 1 h and 22 1 p of the Act which was disposed of by the Small Causes Court allowing the petition and passing an order of eviction against the appellant by judgement and order of February 4, 2000.
J U D G E M E N T This appeal by special leave is directed against the Judgement of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore dated 13th April, 2000 in R.R.P No.227 of 2000.
Before preferring the Revision Petition he had neither deposited number paid the arrears of rent, but he sent the same by money order to the landlords on 11th April, 2000.
The appellant preferred a Revision Petition before the High Court on 6th April, 2000 under Section 50 1 of the Act.
The facts of the case are number in dispute.
The appellant before us is a tenant and the respondents are the landlords.
