PW 1 was the brother of the deceased and PW 2 owner of the shop where PW 1 used to work.
The Doctor who examined the deceased and performed post mortem examination seat the viscara for chemical analysis and according to the report, the viscara did companytain endrine poison.
Both the Courts below have after careful examination of the facts and circumstances of the case believed the evidence of PW 1 and 2 and held that the dying declaration made by the deceased has been proved and was true.
The oral dying declaration is fully supported by PW1 and 2 who stated in their evidence that the deceased bad clearly mentioned that endrine poison was forcibly administered to her.
According to the dying declaration made by the deceased, the two appellants appear to have forcibly administered lethal dose of endrine poison which ultimately resulted in the death of the deceased.
The entire companyviction of the appellant is founded on the oral dying declaration made by the deceased Nalluri Vankatanarasamme to PWs 1 and 2.
The dying declaration received intrinsic support from the number of injuries found on the person of the deceased which show that both the appellants used force.
The deceased was taken to the Hospital, but as she was number fully companyscious numberstatement companyld be recorded at the hospital.
A detailed narrative of the prosecution story has been given in the judgment of the High Court and it is number necessary for us to repeat the same all over again.
