Civil Judge Sr.
OPP II.
The Addl.
4858 of 2004, whereby the High Court has been pleased to dismiss the second appeal filed by the appellant at the stage of admission.
4 and 5?
The suit was filed claiming a declaration that Respondent No.1 is senior to two of her companyleagues and also praying for a declaration that the promotional order dated 10.9.1991, by which the junior companyleagues of the Respondent No.1 were promoted, was illegal and invalid.
However, in the written statement which was filed by the appellant corporation before the trial companyrt, it appears that the said plea was taken that the promotion in the appellant corporation was based on Merit cum Seniority and number on the basis of seniority alone.
The High Court did number pass any order on the same since the appeal was dismissed on merit at the stage of admission.
Whether the impugned orders dated 10.9.1991, passed by defendant Nos.
1 and 2 promoting the defendant number.4 and 5 to the post of Sr.
A suit for declaration was filed by the Respondent No.1 against the appellant Haryana State Electronics Development Corporation Limited hereinafter referred to as the appellant corporation and two of her companyleagues, who according to Respondent No.1 were promoted by the appellant corporation even though they were junior to her.
Ambala Cantt.
Divn. ,
The following issues were framed by the trial companyrt Whether the plaintiff is senior to defendant Nos.
Unfortunately numberissue was framed on that question and obviously numberfinding on that was reached.
GANGULY, J. Leave granted.
by judgment and order dated 5.2.2002 inter alia held that Respondent No.1 is senior to her companyleagues, the defendant number.
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 15.2.2005 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in R.S.A. No.
There is a delay of one day in filing of the appeal before the High Court.
4 and 5 in the suit and that the order of promotion dated 10.9.1991 passed by the respondent companyporation purporting to promote the said defendants on the post of Senior Receptionist cum PBX Operator is illegal and void.
