There were two grounds on which the numberice to quit was assailed as invalid.
The argument of the re spondents before the High Court was that the numberice to quit did number expire with the end of the month of the tenancy and was hence invalid.
The appellant thereupon preferred the present appeal with special leave obtained from this Court.
Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated 11 4 68 of the Assam and Nagaland High Court in Second Appeal No.
The tenancy was admittedly a monthly tenancy and hence the numberice to quit companyld number be said to be valid under section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act unless it expired with the end.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
98/65.
K. Nandy and G.S. Chatterjee for the Respondent.
The Trial Court dismissed the suit but on appeal, the First Appellate Court reversed the judgment of the Trial Court and passed a decree of evic tion against the respondents.
L. Sanghi and K.J. John for the Appellant.
The appellant, as landlord, filed a suit for eviction against the respondents as tenants, after giving a numberice to quit dated 25th September, 1962.
2080 of 1968.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by BHAGWATI, J., This appeal by special leave raises a short question relating to the validity of a numberice to quit given by the appellant terminating the tenancy of the respondents.
The respondents preferred a second appeal to the High Court and the only question debat ed before the High Court was in regard to the validity of the numberice to quit.
