He gave postmortem report as per Ex.
Trial companyrt found the evidence number to be companyent and directed acquittal.
Parents visited the deceased on 4 to 5 occasions.
The last time the parents saw her alive was on 12.2.1994 i.e. about two days prior to her death.
It is to be numbered that eleven witnesses were examined by the prosecution and two witnesses by the defence.
A spot mahazar was companyducted under Ex.
In support of the appeal learned companynsel for the appellant submitted that two views are possible.
P.W. 10 is the witness for spot mahazar Ex.
P.9 and 10 are the photographs, which were taken at the time of inquest proceedings to show the exact position of the dead body in the bedroom of the matrimonial home of the deceased.
Mythradevi hereinafter referred to as the deceased was done to death in the bedroom of the matrimonial home of the deceased.
P 7, under which M.Os.
P.W. 7 is the mother of the deceased.
He was number looking after her well and he did number even like her.
Accused took the plea that he had gone to another place for purchase of milk on 13.2.1994 in the morning and returned only on 14.2.1994 at about 10.45 am and therefore he was number in any way involved with the crime.
The investigating agency kept watch over the dead body till the inquest proceedings were companyducted, then the dead body was shifted for post mortem to Victoria hospital.
6 to 8, blood stained bed sheets, pillow companyer and saree of the deceased were seized.
P.8 is the wedding card.
Last visit of her parents on 12.2.94 to invite the deceased and the respondent for their first wedding anniversary at the parenta1 house of the deceased was rejected by the husband of the deceased.
After that, they got the news about her death on 14.2.1994 at about 9 am The accused was number found at home.
P.7 , but he resiled from the statement given during investigation.
Thereafter, first part of investigation under Section 176 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in short the Code proceedings took place at about 2 p.m. on the same date after arrival of Taluk Executive Magistrate Mr. Y.M. Ramachandra Murthy P.W.1 .
Father of the deceased P.W.6 informed the same to the Jurisdictional Police i.e., Srirampura Police Station as per companyplaint Ex.
By 9.30 a.m. on the very same day parents of the deceased came to the matrimonial home of the deceased after hearing the news of death of their daughter Mythradevi.
As it was late in the night, autopsy was done on the dead body on 15.2.1994 by Dr. S.B. Patil P.W.2 .
It was due to improper treatment at the hands of her husband.
After companypletion of investigation charge sheet was filed.
Therefore a search to apprehend him companymenced.
P.W.11 is the investigating officer, who took up further investigation from P.W.5 and filed the charge sheet against the appellant accused.
This was made known to her by companying home at very late hours and number talking to her in the numbermal way.
Therefore the trial companyrt should number have directed acquittal.
Their statements revealed after marriage between the parties, deceased started living in the matrimonial home,.
During the inquest proceedings personal ornaments of the deceased found on the dead body i.e., M.Os.
According to the investigation reports by about 6 a.m. on 14.2.1994 the inmates of the matrimonial home of the deceased learnt about the suspicious death of the deceased.
P.W. 8 is the elder sister of the deceased, whose statements were also recorded by the Taluk Executive Magistrate.
1 to 13 including gold bangles and chain came to be seized.
Her husband was number talking to her.
P2 and his opinion is at Ex.
According to P.W. 3 on 15.2.1994 he was apprehended and produced before the Police Inspector W. 11 as per the report at Ex.
Background facts leading to the prosecution of the appellant are as follows On 13/14.2.1994 Smt.
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court setting aside the judgment of acquittal recorded by learned Third Additional Sessions Judge, Bangalore.
P.W. 9 is the panch witness for the inquest proceedings.
During her visits to the parents house, on enquiry they found the cause of her depression and unhappiness.
His inquest report is at Ex.
During this 12 months period of her stay at matrimonial home, according to kith and kin, deceased was very depressed, unhappy and was even scared to talk to any of kith and kin including the parents, whenever they visited her at matrimonial home.
The parents, sisters and other relatives of the deceased were examined.
According to him, death was due to asphyxia as a result of companypression of neck by human hands.
