1,500/ .
2 companytinued to work, but subsequently he was also prevented from performing his teaching duties.
2 after having been selected by the Selection Committee companystituted under the provisions of the rules was appointed as Assistant Teacher in the institution on probation for a period of one year.
The Management of the institution advertised the said vacancy and invited applications for appointment to the said post.
1 on probation for a period of one year.
In the year 1984, a post of Assistant Teacher in the institution fell vacant.
1 was selected and recommended by the Selection Committee for appointment as Assistant Teacher.
The Tribunal allowed both the appeals and directed for reinstatement of the appellants.
1, and others, in response to the said advertisement submitted applications and for that purpose a Selection Committee was companystituted in accordance with the provisions of the Act and the Rules framed thereunder.
Appellant No.
1 joined the service at Madhyamika Vidyalaya Mattiwade w.e.f 1.7.85 on a pay scale of Rs.
It is against the said judgment and order of the High Court, the appellants have preferred these appeals by way of Special Leave Petitions.
Consequently, appellant No.
Aggrieved, the Management filed two Civil Revision Petitions before the High Court of Karnataka.
The method of appointment and companydition of services of the teachers and employees working in the institutions are governed by the Karnataka Private Educational Institutions Discipline and Control Act, 1975 hereinafter referred to as the Act and the Rules framed thereunder known as the Karnataka Private Educational Institutions Discipline and Control Rules, 1978 hereinafter referred to as the Rules .
Appellant No.
The Management, by a resolution dated 24.6.85, resolved to appoint appellant No.
Similarly, appellant No.
In such circumstances, the appellants herein, preferred separate appeals before the Tribunal companystituted under the Act.
It is alleged that appellant No.
N. KHARE, J. Leave granted.
750/ to Rs.
It is alleged that appellant No.
There is an organisation known as Vishwa Bharata Seva Samithi hereinafter referred to as the Samithi .
1 companytinued to teach till June 1994 when he was prevented by the Management of the School from performing his teaching assignment.
The institution is a private government aided school, recognised by the Government of Karnataka.
