This circular gave an offer to the holder of the land in case they surrender 65 of their land free of any encumbrances with absolute title, then the Government would permit such holder to utilize 35 of that land for development as per the scheme.
The submission for the Appellant is that the High Court did number examined either the circular of the lease under which Appellant is assigned and recorded the finding without disclosing any plausible reason against the Appellant.
The Appellant case is, he agreed with all such terms and companyditions and is fully qualified in terms of the said circular.
The issue for companysideration is whether Appellant have any right to claim benefit under the Circular dated 9.2.1988 issued by the Government.
P. Misra, J. Leave granted.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
The Appellant has challenged the order of the High Court dated 4th August, 1998 dismissing the writ petition filed by the Appellant rejecting the claim of the Appellant that he is the title holder of the land in question, which is the subject matter of acquisition proceedings under Section 126 of the Monopolies Restrictive Trade Practices Act read with Section 6 of the Acquisition Act.
