The other prosecution witnesses PW 1 and PW 15 have also identified the dead body of Raman.
The dead body of Raman was thereafter taken away in a gunny bag and then thrown in a valley near Deona Darshan Point.
He seized some currency at the instance of accused No.6 Satish.
It is stated that accused No.2 Rinku and accused No.3 Kishor, during interrogation companyfessed that on 8th May 2003 between 1.00 p.m.to 1.30 p.m. they along with accused No.4 Tarachand and accused No.6 Satish with the help of accused No.1 Nalini and accused No.5 Arun had companymitted murder of Raman by strangulation in the cattle shed of one Nitin Rai.
of the dead body.
The Trial Court held that the death of Raman was homicidal death.
After the post mortem was companyducted on the dead body, it was handed over to the family members relatives for funeral.
The muddemal property, seized articles, viscera etc.
Police Inspector R.B.Bansod PW 17 was entrusted with the investigation of the case.
The Investigating Officer R.B.Bansod carried out further investigation.
Thereafter, they proceeded to the other location where the dead body was found lying in the valley near Deona Darshan Point.
Shantabai PW 15 also identified the dead body of her son when it was brought to their house.
The prosecution examined in all 18 witnesses.
The Doctor himself identified deceased Raman as he was known to him.
was then sent to the Chemical Analyser for analysis.
The dead body and the recovered articles were then brought to Narkhed.
As numberhing came out of that interrogation, the said accused persons were allowed to go back.
The offence was then companyverted and registered under Section 364, 302 and 201 read with Section 34/120 B of the IPC.
The Investigating Officer R.B.Bansod companypleted the necessary formalities of preparing memorandum of statements of the said accused, Panchnamas, seizure panchnamas memos, Inquest panchnama etc.
Firstly, they showed the place of burning the articles from where the remains in the form of ash and a bunch of keys was seized.
The dead body was then sent to Primary Health Centre, Narkhed for post mortem examination.
The trial proceeded before the 3rd Addl.
He recorded statements of the witnesses, seized the vehicle Tata Sumo used in the companymission of offence for transporting the dead body, recovered the wrist watch and gold ring at the instance of accused No.3 Kishor and accused No.6 Satish respectively.
In furtherance of that companyspiracy on 8th May 2003, Raman was abducted by the accused persons and on the same day in the numbern he was killed in the cattle shed of Nitin Rai.
He then verified the bunch of keys recovered from the spot disclosed by the accused by applying it on the cupboard in the house of deceased Raman.
On the same day, he called accused No.1 Nalini and Accused No.2 Rinku to the Police Station for interrogation.
On companysidering the oral and documentary evidence adduced by the prosecution, the Trial Court held that the accused persons companyspired to kill Raman.
All the accused pleaded number guilty and to have been falsely implicated.
After the investigation was companypleted, police report was filed in the Court of J.M.F.C., Narkhed, who companymitted the case for trial of the accused before the Sessions Court at Nagpur.
However, on the same evening, he arrested both Nalini and Rinku and thereafter accused No.3 Kishor, accused No.4 Tarachand in the mid night of 12th May 2003.
The prosecution case is that, on 10th May 2003, Shriniwas son of Wasudeorao Tonpe lodged a report Exh.154 that his elder brother Raman has gone missing since morning of 8th May 2003.
Similarly, the articles such as gunny bag used for carrying the dead body and rope used for strangulation, clothes worn by deceased Raman at the relevant time as also the documents in his possession were burnt at a different spot which was disclosed to the Police by the companycerned accused.
Thereafter remaining accused i.e. accused No.5 Arun, accused No.6 Satish and accused No.7 Suresh Chandra were arrested.
He also arranged for identification parade of the wrist watch and gold ring.
Thereafter with a view to dispose of the dead body of Raman and to destroy the evidence of murder, they carried the dead body of Raman and threw it in the valley near Pachmadi in the State of Madhya Pradesh at the spot later on disclosed to the Police by the companycerned accused.
They claimed to be tried.
He prepared a panchnama of the place of incident in the cattle shed of Nitin Rai, seized clothes of accused No.2 Rinku, accused No.3 Kishore and accused No.6 Satish and of deceased Raman.
The dead body was identified by the companyplainant Madan Tonpe PW 1 at the spot i.e. Deona Darshan Point itself.
The mother of the deceased, Smt.
M.KHANWILKAR,J. These appeals are filed by the original accused No.1 Crl.
