The other companytentions which are raised are that the respondent No.
It is claimed that it had set up a Citizens Tribunal to go into the causes and extent of companymunal violence in Gujarat headed by two retired Honble Judges of this Court.
The petitioner has filed the Report of the said Tribunal, which published in two volumes.
This Writ Petition was filed on 1.5.2006 and numberice thereof was issued on 11.5.2006 and ever since then, number of interim orders in nature of directions came to be passed.
3 Shri P.C. Pandey was the Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad during the period when the companymunal disturbances rocked the State of Gujarat.
Shortly stated, the petitioner claiming itself to be an organization, which was started as a response to the alleged carnage which took place in Gujarat from 27.2.2002 onwards with the main objective to bridge the gap between the various religious companymunities, as also to ensure that justice is done to those who are the victims of companymunalism.
The other prayer in the Writ Petition is to direct respondent No.
1 State of Gujarat to take disciplinary action including prosecuting respondent No.
Notice was issued by this Court on 11.5.2006 to the respondents, whereupon, the State of Gujarat has companye up with a Counter Affidavit, denying most of the companytentions raised in the Writ Petition.
147 of 2004, wherein, the Union of India had given an undertaking that he would number handle any cases relating to Gujarat riots of 2002.
It is claimed that more than 700 persons died and number of irregularities were companymitted by Shri Pandey such as number supplying the reinforcements and serious derelictions of his duties.
3 for having failed in his duties during the Gujarat carnage of 2002.
Number of other allegations have been made that Shri Pandey was sent on deputation to CBI, which appointment was challenged before this Court by the petitioner by filing Writ Petition C No.
S. SIRPURKAR, J. This Writ Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India has been filed basically challenging the appointment and companytinuation of respondent No.
3 Shri P.C. Pandey to the post of Director General of Police, State of Gujarat.
