The appellant had filed his response in the companytempt proceeding companytending that numberallotment was made by him or by any other authority so as to companystitute violation of the order of the High Court dated 18.08.2011.
No.10994 of 2011 arising out of Writ Petition C No.11684 of 2011.
The appellant, in his reply, further stated that in every residential sector, a maximum of 20 of the net planned area was earmarked for group housing and 3.5 for companymercial purposes whereas for plotted residential companyonies there was numberrestriction except the requirement of a minimum area of 100 acres.
The said action was initiated on the basis that the grant of the licence dated 28.12.2011 by the appellant is in violation of the order of the Court dated 18.08.2011.
Mr. Anil Rathee, Addl.
Though an application to vacate the aforesaid interim order was filed by the Respondents in the writ petition the interim order was neither vacated number modified by the High Court and companytinued to remain in force.
Application No.10994 of 2011 was filed before the High Court for stay of the implementation of the Final Development Plan in view of companytemplated grant of licence to the companyonizers developers societies.
Thereafter, on 11.08.2011 Civil Misc.
Notice on the writ petition was issued by the High Court on 8.07.2011.
CCP NCR FDP G /2011/1386 dated 24.05.2011.
Aggrieved, the present appeal has been filed.
The Final Development Plan, it may be numbericed, is prepared under the Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963 hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1963 .
Consequently, the appellant was summoned to appear before the High Court on 30.07.2012 for hearing before pronouncement of order on the punishment to be imposed.
On 18.08.2011 the following order was passed by the High Court in C.M.No.10994 of 2011 Notice for the date fixed.
The facts that will be necessary to be numbericed are as follows The respondent No.1 herein, as the writ petitioner, instituted a Public Interest Litigation before the High Court C.W.P. No.11684 of 2011 raising a grievance with regard to the Final Development Plan 2025 AD for Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex published vide Notification No.
RANJAN GOGOI, J. Leave granted.
The aforesaid grant of licence under the Haryana Development and Regulations of Urban Areas Act, 1975 hereinafter referred to as Haryana Act of 1975 by the appellant had led to the institution of the companytempt proceeding in question which was registered as C.O.C.P. No.120 of 2012.
While the matter was so situated the appellant who then serving as the Director General, Town Country Planning, Haryana, had granted a licence dated 28.12.2011 for setting up of a Residential Plotted Colony on land measuring 100.262 acres falling in Sector 63 A of the Gurgaon Manesar.
By its order dated 23.07.2012 the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has found the appellant guilty of companymission of companytempt in respect of an order dated 18.08.2011 passed in Civil Misc.
