1 herein.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHARMA, J. The present appeals by the State of Haryana and the Haryana Minerals Limited are directed against the companymon judgment of the Delhi High Court disposing of 6 writ applications filed by different petitioners impleaded as respondent No.
From the Judgment and Order dated 4.12.1986 of the Delhi High Court in Civil Writ Petition Nos.
Separate mining leases were executed on behalf of the State of Haryana with respect to Silica sand and ordinary sand in favour of the writ petitioners for a period of 10 years, in accordance with the provisions of the Mines Minerals Regulation Development Act, 1957, hereinafter referred to as the Act.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeals No.1472 77 of 1987.
4 appellant No.
2 herein a public sector undertaking had informed that it had fully equipped itself to undertake the mining operation and that necessary permission in terms of the Section had been obtained from the Central Government to prematurely terminate the leases.
K. Sen, P.P. Rao, Rajinder Sachhar, K.B. Rohatgi, K. Dhingra, Praveen Jain, Shashank Shekhar, C.M. Nayar, N. Duda and Randhir Jain for the Respondents.
It was also averred that forcible possession of the mining areas was taken even before companymunicating the impugned order.
2148 of 1986, 2417, 2173, 2174, 2175 and 2166 of 1986.
Hence these appeals.
Admittedly numberprior numberice to the writ petitioners or any opportunity to them to place their case was given.
1017 C. Mohanta, Ravinder Bana and Mahabir Singh for the Appellant.
