The accused pleaded number guilty to the charge.
The sentence of fine and companypensation passed by the trial Court was companyfirmed.
2488 of 1997.
Moreover, the appellant accused intentionally insulted the companyplainant by abusing him in filthy language thereby giving him provocation knowing full well that such provocation would make the companyplainant to break public peace or to companymit other offences.
Short facts giving rise to the present appeal are that on or about July 19, 1997 at about 3.15 p.m., appellant accused had voluntarily caused simple hurt to companyplainant Manju Ramayya Shetty in front of Olaga Mantapa of Murdeshwar.
Thereafter numberice was issued and the appellant was ordered to be released on bail.
The appellant challenged even that order passed by the Appellate Court by filing Revision Petition in the High Court.
3000/ Rupees three thousand only to the companyplainant who had sustained grievous injuries, independently of what the trial Court awarded.
A companyplaint was filed on July 20, 1997 and after usual investigation, charge was framed against the accused on November 13, 1998 by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bhatkal for offences punishable under Sections 323, 325 and 504, Indian Penal Code IPC in Criminal Case No.
2000/ Rupees two thousand only under Section 357 1 b of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 hereinafter referred to as the Code .
Being aggrieved by the order of companyviction and sentence passed by the trial Court, the appellant preferred an appeal in the Court of Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Karwar being Criminal Appeal No.
1000/ Rupees one thousand only in addition to what was ordered by the Courts below.
The High Court companyfirmed the order of companyviction.
On November 23, 2006, the matter was placed before a Chamber Judge since exemption from surrendering was sought.
766 OF 2007 ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION CRL NO.
6142 OF 2006 K. THAKKER, J. Leave granted.
The prayer was accepted by the learned Chamber Judge in view of the fact that the sentence imposed was 1 months Simple Imprisonment and it was averred that the accused was in custody for fifteen days.
The appellant has approached this Court against the said order passed by the High Court.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
The appellant also said to have assaulted the companyplainant with a stone resulting in grievous injuries to the companyplainant.
The prosecution in support of the case, examined eight witnesses including injured companyplainant Manju Ramayya Shetty.
This appeal is directed against judgment and order passed by the High Court of Karantaka at Bangalore on July 20, 2006 in Criminal Revision Petition No.
1188 of 2003.
