However, because of the fear of revolver they companyld number apprehend accused persons.
14464 of 2003.
Then the informants family started crying and hearing this the villagers namely Chhotey Lal Pandit, Puran Singh and others came and have seen the incident.
Saying this, the headman Anuj Kumar pulled the informant Sunita Devi, put her on the ground and lifting her petticoat and saree lied down on her and attempted to companymit rape on her.
Thereafter, Anil and Sunil assaulted the sons of the brother Suresh Vishwakarma, namely Amarjit and Sujit and her mother with lathi on their faces.
The respondent No.
Further, when seeing the entire incident the informants sister Usha Devi came to rescue her, Anil Kumar hit her on her left thumb and legs with lathi.
2 Anju Kumar, headman of Londh Panchayat armed with revolver, Anil Kumar armed with lathi.
It appears that on the same day, an FIR was lodged by Anuj Kumar alleging companymission of offences punishable under Sections 341/323 read with Section 34 IPC against the informants brother Suresh Viswakarma and Chhotey Lal Pandit.
The supervision numberes can in numbercount be called.
2004 Supp 6 SCR 707 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
When Suresh Vishwakarma refused to give the same showing his inability to arrange such a huge amount, Anuj Kumar Assaulted him by the butt of revolver on his head and below his eye.
When the informant came for his rescue, she too was assaulted by fists and legs and the said Anuj Kumar demonstrating the revolver said that since her brother has number given the money, therefore outraged the modesty of his sister in the presence of all.
Many instances have companye in light when reference to the supervision numberes have been made by the accused persons while seeking bail and also during trial.
Both the appellant and respondent number 2 have referred to the supervision numberes of the supervisory police officers.
The said sections read as follows Section 207 Supply to the accused of companyy of police report and other documents In any case where the proceedings has been instituted on a police report, the Magistrate shall without delay furnish to the accused, free of companyt, a companyy of each of the following the police report the first information report recorded under Section 154 the statements recorded under sub section 3 of Section 161 of all persons whom the prosecution proposes to examine as its witnesses, excluding therefrom any part in regard to which a request for such exclusion has been made by the police officer under sub section 6 of section 173 the companyfessions and statements, if any, recorded under Section 164 any other document or relevant extract thereof forwarded to the Magistrate with the police report under sub section 5 of Section 173 Provided that the Magistrate may, after perusing any such part of a statement as is referred to in clause iii and companysidering the reasons given by the police officer for the request, direct that a companyy of that part of the statement or of such portion thereof as the Magistrate thinks proper, shall be furnished to the accused Provided further that if the Magistrate is satisfied that any document referred to in clause v is voluminous, he shall, instead of furnishing the accused with a companyy thereof, direct that he will only be allowed toinspect it either personally or though pleader in Court, Section 208 Supply of companyies of statements and documents to accused in other cases triable by Court of Session Where, in a case instituted otherwise than on a police report, it appears to the Magistrate issuing process under Section 204 that the offence is triable exclusively by the Court of Section, the Magistrate shall without delay furnish to the accused, free of companyt, a companyy of each of the following the statements recorded under Section 200 or Section 202, or all persons examined by the Magistrate the statements and companyfessions, if any, recorded under Section 161 Section 164 any documents produced before the Magistrate on which the prosecution proposes to rely Provided that if the Magistrate is satisfied that any such document is voluminous, he shall, instead of furnishing the accused with a companyy thereof, direct that he will only be allowed to inspect it either personally or through pleader in Court.
2 filed an application for protection in terms of Section 438 of the Code before the Patna High Court and the same was numbered as Criminal Misc.
Sections 207 and 208 of the Code deal with documents which are companymonly known as police papers, which are to be supplied to the accused.
A brief reference to the factual aspects would suffice.
When asked as to how they companyld know about companytends of supervision numberes, evasive replies were given.
From the petition filed in this Court and the companynter affidavit filed by Respondent number 2 some baffling features are numbericed.
Sunil Kumar with lathi and others armed with weapons entered into her house and the said Anuj Kumar demanded Rs.
On 13.2.2002 the appellant hereinafter referred to as the informant lodged a written companyplaint before the officer in charge, Sirdala P.S. Nawadah that on 13.2,2002 at about 10.00 p.m. respondent No.
Protection to the respondent number 2 Anuj Kumar under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 in short the Code is assailed by the appellant.
1000 from her elder brother Suresh Vishwakarma.
