As.90 91/2009contd Learned companynsel for the respondent, on the other hand, while supporting the order passed by the High Court, has submitted that the incident had taken place due to business rivalry and further numberspecific role having been attributed to the respondent, the High Court was justified in granting anticipatory bail to the respondent.
These two appeals have been filed by the State and by the companyplainant against order, dated December 27, 2007, passed by the High Court of judicature at Bombay in Criminal Application No.
Accordingly to the appellants, since there are serious allegations against the respondent in the charge sheet, the High Court erred in granting anticipatory bail to him.
Leave granted.
