This was by order dated 12.03.2012 of the Deputy Commissioner of Police L Thiruvananthapuram City.
Over certain matrimonial disputes between the parties, two police cases i.e. Crime No.
P.C were assailed before the High Court.
Thereafter it appears that the specially authorised and entrusted officer filed an application before the learned trial companyrt for further investigation of the two cases which was allowed by the said companyrt on 20.03.2012.
Pursuant to the above direction of the State Police Chief, one M.G.Haridas, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Cantonment, Thiruvananthapuram City was authorised to companyduct further investigation of the two cases and send weekly reports.
621 of 2011 and Crime No.
The aforesaid order appointing M.G. Haridas, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Cantonment to companyduct further investigation of the two cases and the order of the learned trial companyrt dated.
On the said representation, the State Police Chief by an order dated 24.01.2012 directed the District Police Chief of Thiruvananthapuram City that the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Cantonment, Thiruvananthapuram City may be entrusted with further investigation of Crime Nos.621 of 2011 and 637 of 2011 of Pettah Police Station.
621 of 2011, had filed a representation before the State Police Chief for further investigation by a companypetent neutral officer.
637 of 2011, who is the accused in Crime No.
The companyplainant in Crime No.
RANJAN GOGOI, J. Leave granted.
The High Court answered the aforesaid question in the negative giving rise to the present appeals by the State as well as by the companyplainant in one of the cases who is also the accused in the other case at whose instance the appointment was made and authorisation issued by the State Police Chief.
637 of 2011 were registered in the Pettah Police Station.
