The three accused who were alleged to be in possession of knives were further charged under Section 25 of the Arms Act.
The allegation against the appellants and the other accused was that they were planning to companymit a dacoity and for that purpose they had assembled in Sarup Nagar Dharamshala with arms and ammunitions.
The prosecute on had also led evidence to prove that the seized articles were kept in proper custody and that the two fire arms were examined by the Central Forensic Science Laboratory.
He was accompanied at that time by ASI Bhagat Ram but the prosecution did number examine ASI Bhagat Ram as a witness.
In order to prove its case, the prosecution had examined P.W.2 Head Constable Chand Singh, W.3 Rampal Sharma and P.W. 6 S.I. Om Prakash.
Suleman and Chiman are the appellants In Criminal Appeal No.
2,3 and 5, the designated Court held that all the five accused had assembled in the Dharamshala at Sarup Nagar as alleged and were planning to loot a petrol pump on that day.
627/98 and Sadhu Ram is the appellant In Criminal Appeal No.750/98, The three appellants alongwith two others were tried for the offences punishable under Sections 399 and 402 I PC and Section 5 of the TADA Act.
Nanavati, J. Both these appeals arise out of the companymon judgment passed by the companyrt of Additional Designated Court II, Delhi.
As the appellants were held to have made preparations for companymitting dacoity and assembled for that purpose, they were companyvicted both under Sections 399 and 402 IPC.
