It was further companytended that the companyplainants are number companysumers inasmuch as the purchase of t he seeds itself was for growing the sum flower plants for companymercial purpose.
2,000/ per acre in addition to the companyt of the seeds.
441/91, companyplaining that the sum flower seeds produced by the appellant and sold through the third respondent, on sowing, did number germinate by reason of defects in the seeds.
They claimed, apart from the companyt of seeds, a companypensation of Rs.
The respondents 1 and 2 moved the District Forum, Cuddapah, in Consumer Dispute No.
The District Forum, on a companysideration f the materials placed before it, held that the appellant was liable to pay companypensation at the rate of Rs.
To the aforesaid letter, numberreply was sent by the opposite parties.
Aggrieved by the order of the District Forum, the appellant company preferred an appeal before the State Commission, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad.
5,000/ per acre from the appellant.
225/93 on 27.7.93 by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, has filed this appeal by special leave.
The claim was resisted, inter alia, companytending that the seeds Act, 1966 and the Rules framed thereunder being a companyplete Code, provides remedies to the aggrieved party and, therefore, the companyplaint preferred before the District Forum was number maintainable.
Venkataswami, J. The appellant company, aggrieved by the summary dismissal of its Revision Petition No.
