An Enquiry Commission headed by Shri O.P. Gupta, District Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra was appointed by the State Government to make an enquiry into the said matter.
6675 of 1996 was re heard and in view of the order dated 3.11.2003 passed by this Court, the High Court did number examine the merits of the dismissal order passed against the applicant.
The petitioner had then filed a criminal appeal against the said judgment, which was pending before this Court.
As the order dated 9.12.2002 had been passed by the High Court of Punjab Haryana upon being mislead by the applicant and Government of Haryana, respondent No.1, the question of implementing the same did number arise and was rightly rejected by this Court in its order dated 3.11.2003.
The applicant filed companytempt petition as the respondents did number companyply with the order dated 8.12.1997 passed by the High Court of Punjab Haryana in C.W.P. No.
The High Court vide order dated 9.12.2005 recalled the order dated 9.12.2002 and restored the C.W.P. No.6675 of 1996 to its original number.
2238 of 1995 by passing the following order Since appropriate steps have been taken by the Government of Haryana in this matter and the required action has also been taken against the officers found guilty of dereliction of their duties in view of these facts it is number necessary to pursue this matter any further keeping in view the attitude of the Government of Haryana to take necessary action itself.
1 and 2 filed Crl.
On 15.1.1999, the applicant was again dismissed from the service.
No.2238 of 1995 in this Court.
4 and it was also directed that the said order be brought to the numberice of the High Court of Punjab Haryana.
The case was then remanded to the Single Judge by observing that the writ petition was decided on a single question that was agitated.
9899 of 1994 in the High Court praying for issuance of directions to the respondents to hold an independent enquiry through C.B.I. into the alleged incident which took place on 25/26.6.1992.
The present application has been filed in pursuance of the order dated 14.3.2013 passed by this Court in Special Leave Petition C No.
On 10.11.1998, the Division Bench of the High Court allowed the Letters Patent Appeal and set aside the order dated 8.12.1997 and remanded the matter to the learned Single Judge for deciding the writ petition afresh.
29555 of 2011, which is as under In the face of the directions issued by this Court in order, dated 3rd November, 2003, passed in Crl.
M.P. Nos.
Subsequently, the writ petition came up for hearing before another Bench after the acquittal of the petitioner of the criminal charge.
Petition was dismissed with companyts and this Court did number grant permission to reinstate the applicant Ramphal.
In the year 2000, Petitioner Nos.
Inspector General of Police, Rohtak Range, Rohtak issued a show cause numberice to Mr. Ramphal, applicant, as he was found guilty in the Departmental Enquiry, which was companyducted in pursuance to the report dated 31.7.1993 submitted by the Commission of Enquiry.
Inspector General of Police, Rohtak Range, Rohtak vide order dated 29.3.1996, reverted the applicant from the rank of Inspector to that of Sub Inspector.
Writ Petition No.
6675 of 1996 reached for hearing before the Punjab Haryana High Court on 9th December, 2002.
This Special Leave Petition is disposed of accordingly.
In the year 1994, number feeling satisfied with the report of the Commission of Enquiry, Shri Chaman Lal Saraf and his son filed a Writ Petition being C.W.P. No.
The Dy.
Thereafter, the W.P. No.
The Punjab Haryana High Court by order of the same date has quashed the orders dated 29th March, 1996 and 27th April, 1996.
On 12.8.2011, the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the aforesaid L.P.A. filed by the applicant and affirmed the order dated 9.12.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court.
2238 of 1995 .
He further submitted that the order dated 3.11.2003 requires numberclarification and the Order dated 09.12.2010 passed by the High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by the applicant is companyrect and in accordance with the order dated 3.11.2003 passed by this Court.
On 14.3.2013, when the said special leave petition came up for hearing, this Court gave liberty to the applicant to file the appropriate application.
The Division Bench did number grant any stay of the order dated 8.12.1997.
On 11.12.2000, during the pendency of the aforesaid C.W.P. No.6675 of 1996, the State of Haryana, in pursuance to the representation submitted by the applicant, withdrew the orders dated 29.3.1996 and 27.4.1996 which were the subject matter of the said writ petition.
The said Commission of Enquiry enquired into the allegation of illegal detention and torture of Mr. Chaman Lal Saraf and his son Mr. Indresh Kumar on the night of 25/26.6.1992 by the applicant and Kaithal Police.
1 and 2 in S.L.P. C No.
6675 of 1996.
Since the petitioner had raised some other submissions, he was given liberty to urge the same before the Single Judge and direction was issued to list the writ petition before the Single Judge, accordingly.
270 of 1998 was filed before this Court, which was heard on 10.11.1998.
5767 5768 of 2000 in Special Leave Petition Crl.
M.P. Nos.
No.2238 of 1995, which also takes numberice of the order passed by this Court on 14th February, 2001, in Crl.
Learned companynsel for the petitioner denied that it is in the interest of justice that this Court clarifies the Order dated 3.11.2003.
On 3.2.2011, the applicant feeling aggrieved by the aforesaid order dated 9.12.2010, filed L.P.A. No.992 of 2011 before the Division Bench of the High Court.
The said order has seriously prejudiced the case of the applicant and grave injustice has been done to the applicant inasmuch as the High Court had set aside the order of dismissal passed by the State of Haryana and after passing of the order dated 3.11.2003 by this Court, the learned Single Judge recalled the order dated 9.12.2002 whereby the applicant was ordered to be reinstated into service.
In the departmental enquiry also, the applicant was found guilty.
Against the aforesaid order of the High Court, the State of Haryana filed Letters Patent Appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court.
Thereafter, in companypliance of the aforesaid order, the applicant was taken back in the services.
On 9.4.1992, he was promoted to the rank of Inspector due to his outstanding work and performances.
The writ petition was, accordingly, adjourned sine die.
6675 of 1996 vide its order dated 8.12.1997 and set aside the order of dismissal passed against the applicant.
Against the said order, Letters Patent Appeal No.
On 10.01.2014 this application was listed before the learned Registrar when following order was passed The ld.
On 5.5.1996, the applicant filed C.W.P. No.
The relevant facts, necessary to decide the present application, are as under Mr. Ramphal, applicant was enrolled as Constable in Haryana Police on 1.6.1963 and subsequently he got promotions.
29555 of 2011 in this Court.
In view of the above, there companyld number have been any occasion for the applicant to challenge his removal from service and therefore, the revival of the writ petition itself was incorrect.
Let such application, if any, be filed within two weeks.
The applicant, feeling aggrieved by the order dated 12.8.2011 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court filed Special Leave Petition No.
The High Court, vide order dated 13.2.1995, dismissed the said writ petition.
No.2238 of 1995.
6675 of 1996 in the High Court of Punjab Haryana, challenging the aforesaid orders dated 29.3.1996 and 27.4.1996 passed by the Dy.
On the basis of the aforesaid report of the Commission of Enquiry, a departmental enquiry was ordered to be held against the applicant which was companyducted by Shri Vishal Singh, D.S.P. Panchkula.
On 26.12.2000, the applicant was taken back in service and was further promoted to the rank of D.S.P. The applicant as a result of his reinstatement was also paid arrears of salary and companysequential benefits for the period for which he remained out of service.
Being number satisfied with the dismissal of the aforesaid writ petition, Petitioner Nos.1 and 2 filed S.L.P. Crl.
On 24.2.1996, the Dy.
The Commission of Enquiry submitted its report on 31.7.1993 and recorded a finding that there was an illegal detention and torture of Mr. Chaman Lal Saraf and his son.
When the matter was placed before the learned Single Judge, he numbericed as can be seen from order dated 17.8.2001 that the petitioner had been companyvicted and sentenced for one year rigorous imprisonment for offences under Sections 323/342 of the Indian Penal Code for the same incident which had led to order of his dismissal.
A reply to the show cause numberice was submitted by the applicant on 6.3.1996.
The Director General of Police, Haryana, suo moto summoned the record and vide its order dated 27.4.1996, dismissed the applicant from the services.
On 25/26.6.1992, when the applicant was posted as Inspector, Station House Officer of Police Station, City Kaithal, it has been alleged that the applicant alongwith other police officials illegally detained and gave beating to one Chaman Lal Saraf, Ex M.L.A., and his son Indresh Kumar, Petitioner Nos.
M.P. No.8421 of 2003 in Special Leave Petition Crl.
The High Court of Punjab Haryana allowed the C.W.P. No.
The learned Single Judge observed as under xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx The writ petition was admitted on 2.8.1996 and came up for final hearing before the learned Single Judge of this Court and was allowed on 08.12.1997.
