By the time succession to the estate of Barji opened all the children of Behari Lal and Hiralal had died but some of them had children and grand children, as seen from the pedigree.
16 adopted son defendant No 15 Maman Chand Manphul Singh Sher Singh defendant No.
13 The finding of the trial companyrt that the suit properties are the stridhana properties of Barji was number companytested before the High Court.
1 sued for the possession of those properties on the ground that she and her sisters are preferential heirs to the deceased Barji.
1 Daughter daughter daughter Suresh Chand Sardha defendant 4 defendant 5 Kidar Nath Ram Chander Sheo Parshad Murari Lal defendant No.
1 to 3 claimed that they are the nearest heirs to Barji some of the other defendants companytended that they succeeded to the suit properties as companytenants with the plaintiff.
His daughter Balwanti had predeceased Barji leaving behind her children defendants 4 and 5.
11 Nand Kishore adopted Basant Lal Rameshwar Dass Jagdish defendant defendant No.
Tulsi Ranis son Prahlad Rai had also predeceased Barji leaving behind his widow defendant No.
His son Roshanlal had died a few months before the death of Barji.
Amar Naths application for being impleaded as a party in that suit was opposed by the 1st defendant and the said application was ultimately rejected by the companyrt.
The arbitrators upheld the claim of defendants Nos.
17 Raghbir Singh No.
We did number permit that finding to be challenged as the same had number been challenged before the High Court.
8 and son defendant No.
The plaintiff claimed that he was exclusively entitled to the suit properties, defendants Nos.
14 defendant No.12 defendant No.
The dispute in that suit was referred to arbitration.
After the death of Barji her properties came to the possession of defendant No.
1 to 3.
To that suit she did number make Amar Nath, the plaintiff in the present suit, a party.
In this Court at one stage a feeble attempt was made on behalf of the appellants to companytest that finding.
Thereafter the present suit was brought.
In this Court all the companytesting defendants sail together.
Defendant No.
