The appellant had initiated a truck scheme under Section 36 of the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 hereinafter referred to as the Act was duly published in daily Tribune on January 10, 17 and 24, 1975 for acquiring an extent of 15.5 acres of land in Moga for diversion of the trucks from passing through Moga Town and stationing them at the proposed new Mandi Market.
After receipt of objections and companysideration thereof, numberices in the daily Tribune and also Ajit calling upon the owners to appear before the Committee, were published on August 20, 1975 fixing the date of hearing as August 25, 1975.
The individual numberices were issued to all the persons under Section 38 inviting objections to the Scheme since the Trust had decided to take over possession of the aforesaid property.
Notices were serviced on June 12, 1975 and objections came to be filed by the respondents on August 8, 1975.
After the Governments approval was received, it was published in the same manner on May 23 and 30, 1975 and June 6, 1975 respectively.
Objections had been invited under Section 38 by public numberice dated January 24, 1975.
It was stated as under It is for the information of general public and in particular the owners of the area falling in i Scheme No.1 regarding the land near Thana Sadar, Moga.
Fresh numberice was published in the daily Tribune on May 13, 20 and 27, 1975.
It was also published in local daily by name Ajit on May 11, 18 and 25, 1975.
Notices were, in fact, sent to the respondents by registered post with acknowledgement due on June 11, 1975.
Government numberification was published on October 2, 1975 and October 10, 1975.
Objections were filed on March 25, 1975.
After framing the Scheme, a layout plan was prepared for inspection by the affected persons.
Sd/ Gurdeep Singh Chairman Improvement Trust, Moga.
WITH A.Nos.
Ajit, on October 5 and 10, 1975 respectively.
It would appear that the respondents did number appear on the said date at about 3.00 p.m. fixed for August 25.
1804 of 1986.
The facts fairly are number in dispute.
