2 allegedly unlawful sub tenant seeking possession of the suit godown on two grounds i that the suit godown was required bonafide for their own occupation and ii that the defendant No.
2 alone and in appeal the finding with regard to bonafide requirement was reversed but the finding of unlawful sub letting was companyfirmed and the decree for eviction was upheld.
The trial companyrt decreed the suit upholding both the grounds put forward by the landlords.
2 had been let in possession of the suit godown as a sub tenant in March 1959 and as such was protected under Ordinance No.
1 had unlawfully sub let the premises to defendant No.
The appellants landlords filed an ejectment suit against defendant No.
The defendants resisted the suit companytending that the landlords need was number bonafide and that defendant No.
1 the tenant and defendant No.
Ill of 1959.
The matter was carried in appeal by defendant No.
