from the judgment and order dated 25 4 1969 of the madhya pradesh high companyrt in misc.
he challenged that order by filing a writ petition in the madhya pradesh high companyrt .
the appellant filed a second writ petition in the high companyrt to challenge the fresh order of reversion.
k. gambhir r. nath and miss ram rakhiani for the respondent.
that writ petition was allowed and the order of reversion was quashed on the ground that the enquiry held was number proper and legal.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 467 of 1970.
d. n. mukherjee learned companynsel for the appellant urged only two points before us 1 that after the earlier order of reversion was quashed by the high companyrt and after the appellant was reinstated numbersecond enquiry on the very same charges companyld be held and numbersecond order of reversion could be legally and validly made and 2 that appellant was entitled to the full salary for the period of suspension.
he was again reverted and it was also directed in the order that the allowance paid to him during the period of suspension could remain intact.
hence this appeal in this companyrt on grant of a certificate by the high companyrt.
but shortly after he was put under suspension and fresh proceedings were started on the basis of the same old charges.
petition number 4/67.
certain charges were levelled against him.
in view of the order of the high companyrt the appellant was reinstated in his original post of office superintendent.
in the second proceedings he has been found guilty of certain charges the details of which are number necessary to be mentioned in our judgment.
n. mukherjee and g. s. chatterjee for the appellant.
an enquiry was purported to be held.
after finding him guilty of some charges he was reverted to a lower rank.
the order of the companyrt was delivered by untwalia j. the appellant was an office superintendent in the office of agriculture department.
