The Tribunal discussed the various points raised by petitioner but ultimately disposed of both petitions with certain directions regarding the regularisation of and the grant of certain allowances to the petitioner.
A review petition appears to have been filed by the petitioner No.
This was Civil Appeal No.
This was on 23rd April, 1984.
The first petition R.P. No.
315/77 requested the Tribunal to declare the action of the State of Andhra Pradesh in isolating and framing the rules for the post of Lecturer in Radiological Physics and companyverting the number gazetted post held by the 4th respondent, Shri D.K. Subranmanyam Reddy hereinafter referred to as the respondent , as gazetted and in appointing the 4th respondent to the said post the other R.P. 69/84 companytained a prayer to declare the Government order by which the post of Lecturer in Radiological Physics at the Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, was upgraded to that of Professor of Radiological Physics and G.O. Ms. No.
The Civil Appeal as well as the Writ Petition were heard by three learned Judges of this Court, who dismissed the same on February 7, 1989.
The petitioner also filed Writ Petition No.
The petitioner thereafter preferred Review Petitions Nos.
177 and 194 of 1989, against the above two orders and these were also dismissed on 30th March, 1989.
On an objection raised by the office to the maintainability of these applications, the matter was posted before Court and it was directed that these matters be listed subject to the question of maintainability being agitated before the Bench.
4344 of 1986.
4619 of 1985 praying for a writ of certiorari calling upon the State Government to explain the basis of the various Government orders companyferring benefits on the respondent, a writ of quo warranto restraining the respondent from holding the post mentioned above without having any qualifications therefor and also for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing the State Government to appoint the petitioner to the above post of Professor.
Though the petitioner has number filed what purport to be applications for directions in the above civil appeal, writ petition and review petitions, what the petitioner is seeking in substance is a review of the earlier orders of this Court in the Writ Petition as well as the Civil Appeal.
Ranganathan, J. The petitioner filed two petitions before the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal.
651 dated 20.10.83, promoting the 3rd respondent respondent 4 in the earlier petition as Professor in Radiological Physics as arbitrary and unconstitutional.
607/84 , which was dismissed by the Tribunal on 24.12.84.
Thereupon the petitioner filed a petition for leave to appeal to this Court from the order of the Tribunal which was granted.
