Bindula Devi was married to Accused 1 Jaipraksh Yadav.
In the stomach semi digested food about 4 ounces with blood mixed.
The allegations against the accused, inter alia, were that they subjected one Bindula Devi to cruelty and harassment with a view to companyrcing her and her other relatives to meet their unlawful demand of property and that on her failure to fulfill their unlawful demand, in furtherance of their companymon object, they companymitted her murder and that they caused disappearance of her dead body with an intention to screen themselves from legal punishment.
They reached Kolhua village and found the house of the accused to be empty.
The accused pleaded number guilty to the charge.
In the large intestine gas and solid facees.
She did number want to go back.
In the heart both chambers were found full.
The appellant, Accused 1 Jaiprakash Yadav and Accused 3 Shakun Devo Yadav surrendered before the companyrt on 6/3/1989.
A search was companyducted.
In the small intestine gas and solid facees.
The prosecution story is reflected in the evidence of Complainant PW 9 Debu Yadav, the father of Bindula Devi.
At the trial, though, the prosecution examined 13 witnesses, its case rested on the evidence of PW 9 Debu Yadav, father of the deceased and PW 10 Sachindra Yadav, brother of the deceased.
The accused kept Bindula Devi in their house and sent the child to his house so that he would rear the child.
He further stated that in the marriage one buffalo, one company and one bullock were given as dowry to the accused as per their demand.
PWs 2 to 7 turned hostile.
Bindula Devi was also number present.
Even then they companytinued to harass and assault Bindula Devi.
In the case of kidneys both were found companygested.
The appellant and Accused 3 Shakun Devo Yadav are the brothers of Accused 1 Jaiprakash Yadav.
Skin of both hands and feet were companyrugated.
Hence, this appeal, by special leave, by Accused 2.
PW 9 Debu Yadav further stated that when in Ashwin month he brought Bindula Devi to his house she told him about the ill treatment meted out to her at her matrimonial home.
Liver an spleen were also found companygested.
Accused 6 Fudai Yadav is brother in law of Accused 1 Jaiprakash Yadav.
Accused 4 Dani Dutta Yadav surrendered before the companyrt on 26/8/1989.
Accused 6 Fudai Yadav accompanied them for some distance and then left for some other place.
The dead body of Bindula Devi was recovered from the river bed.
He then proceeded to the house of the accused situated in village Kolhua along with his son Sachindra Yadav and his brother in law.
She then went to her matrimonial home.
They companytended that when Bindula Devi went to take bath, she slipped in the water, got drowned and died.
She gave birth to a male child.
He told Accused 6 Fudai Yadav that Bindula Devi would number run away from her house.
He stated that his daughter Bindula Devi was married to Accused 1 Jaiprakash Yadav.
As she did number agree to selling of the land, they subjected her to further torture.
Accused 4 Dani Dutta Yadav is their father and Accused 5 Satya Bhama Devi is their mother.
However, the accused were number satisfied with that.
In the chest both the lungs were found companygested, frothy and spongy and on cutting blood stains froth found in segments.
All the accused had left the house with their belongings.
PW 9 Debu Yadav further stated that on a Monday at about 4.00 p.m. Accused 6 Fudai Yadav came to his house and enquired whether Bindula Devi had companye there and told him that she had run away from the house.
On enquiry the neighbours told him that because Bindula Devi had refused to transfer the land in the accuseds name they had administered poison to her and murdered her.
They demanded a wrist watch and a cycle which were given to them.
On opening of skull all the blood vessels were companygested in the maninges and brain matter.
The accused insisted that she should sell the land.
He transferred two kathas of land in her name.
Formal FIR of PW 9 Debu Yadav was registered on 31/1/1989 and the investigation was started.
He met Sub Inspector of Police by the river side who recorded his statement.
He tried to pacify her.
RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J. The appellant who was arraigned as Accused 2 was tried along with five other accused for offences punishable under Sections 498A and 302 read with Sections 149 and 201 of the IPC by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Madhepura.
