according to him in the final list of successful candidates his position was shown as number 7 and therefore he was number selected.
original jurisdiction writ petition number 4007 of 1982 under article 32 of the companystitution of india k. jain for the petitioner.
at the interview he improved his position and was ultimately shown as number 7.
5 13 reserved for scheduled castes.
in the return to the rule the additional district judge of ghaziabad has indicated that the petitioner had secured eighth place in shorthand test and his name figured as number 3 in the list of successful candidates as it has been drawn up in alphabetical order.
he further alleged that when six vacancies in the post of stenumberrapher in hindi were advertised to be filled up and he offered himself as a candidate he was examined in shorthand test on april 17 1982 and was shown in the third place in the list of successful candidates published on april 24 1982 and was called to an interview on may 1 1982.
he complains that he was downgraded from the third place without justification and if the government order of reservation of 18 had been kept in view he should have been selected even if he secured the seventh place in the merit list.
it is number the case of the answering respondent that reservation indicated in government order of 1965 was number applicable to the relevant recruitment and the assertion of the petitioner that in the previous years provision of reservation was implemented has also number been disputed.
prithvi raj and mrs.
