On learning about this, the Accused persons had allegedly detained Satheesan, tortured him, and killed him with criminal intention.
3Saswathy.
The unconscious person was later identified to be Satheesan, who was declared dead on being taken to the hospital.
171 of 2018 has been challenged.
On the same day, after the examinationinchief of CW 1 Narayanan was companyducted, an Application under Section 231 2 of the Cr.
P.C. held that deferral of cross examination is number an ordinary practice in a criminal trial, and dismissed the Application filed on behalf of the Respondent Accused No.
It was alleged that the flat had been taken on rent by the RespondentAccused No.
It was directed that the crossexamination of CWs 1 to 4 be adjourned till after the examinationinchief of CW 5.
Aggrieved by the Order dated December 20, 2017 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, the RespondentAccused No.
2, Rasheed.
P.C. before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court II, Thrissur against 8 persons, including the RespondentAccused No.
P.C. was registered at the instance of CW 1Narayanan.
2, for the alleged companymission of offences under Sections 302, 343, 212, 201, 202, 118 and 109 read with Sections 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
A First Information Report under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Cr.
Aggrieved by the Order dated January 1, 2018 passed by the High Court, the State of Kerala has filed the present Special Leave Petition Crl.
CW 1Narayanan then made a statement that Krishnaprasad had been staying in the flat for two months, and was a companypanion of the Respondent Accused No.
171 of 2018.
P.C. was filed by the Counsel for the RespondentAccused No.
4652 of 2018 wherein the impugned Order dated January 9, 2018 passed by the High Court of Kerala in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.
2 and Accused No.
Charges were framed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thrissur.
P.C. before the High Court of Kerala.
On May 24, 2016, the Police filed a ChargeSheet under Section 173 of the Cr.
INDU MALHOTRA, J. Leave granted.
CWs 1 to 5 were summoned as Prosecution Witnesses on December 16, 2017.
The relevant facts for deciding the present Criminal Appeal, are briefly set out below Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA Date 2018.10.30 155628 IST Reason 2.1.
The present Criminal Appeal arises out of Special Leave Petition Crl.
Krishnaprasad, along with others, then carried an unconscious person out of the bathroom of the flat to the ambulance.
According to the Original Statement provided by him to the Police, Krishnaprasad, who was the occupant of a flat in the building where CW 1Narayanan was serving as a security guard, had called for an ambulance.
It was alleged that the deceased Satheesan had disclosed information to his girlfriend, CW 5 Ajitha, regarding the activities which had been taking place inside the rented flat, and about the illicit relationship between the RespondentAccused No.
2 filed Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.
The High Court reversed the Order of the Additional Sessions Judge by a short unreasoned cryptic Order dated January 1, 2018, and allowed Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.
