admittedly madhya bharat came into existence in 1948 only.
so far as gwalior state civil service rules are companycerned a companyy of it in hindi has been filed by the petitioners with the english translation thereof.
the services of all the employees of the erstwhile gnit companypany were taken over by the government of india but they were continued to be governed by the rules which were in force before taking over.
subsequently it was taken over by the delhi municipal companyporation.
it is also number disputed that gnit companypany was originally a companypany incorporated in india where it was owned by the rules of the erstwhile gwalior state.
on 14th may 1948 the transport services in delhi were taken over by the government of india the ministry of transport and it was named as delhi transport service.
the said companypany was operating the transport services in delhi and areas around upto 13th may 1948.
later on by the delhi transport undertaking which came to be termed as delhi transport corporation.
civil original jurisdiction writ petition civil number 1244 of 1986.
i986 of the delhi high companyrt in c.w.p.
from the judgment and order dated 1 .4.
these facts are number in dispute.
clause 7 of the agreement by which the gnit services in delhi were taken over by the government of india provided that the services of the employees who were employed prior to 28th october 1946 and were in companytinuous service till i4th may 1948 shall number be taken over on the terms number less liberal than those they were governed and therefore the employees who were in employment prior to 28th october 1946 were treated as protected employees.
number 795 of 1986.
jitender sharma for the petitioners.
bansal for the respondents.
civil number 8948 of 1986.
pg number1005 it is number in dispute that before 1948 these petitioners were employed in the gnit companypany which was a companypany owned by the rulers of gwalior in the erstwhile native state of gwalior.
under article 32 of the companystitution of india .
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by oza j. this special leave petition is filed against the judgment of the delhi high companyrt rejecting a petition filed by the petitioners.
it is number disputed that these were the rules governing the civil servants in the gwalior state.
with l.p.
ultimately they pleaded their inability to place any rule.
u. mehta and g.k.
