The respondent filed a writ petition before the High Court of Mysore to quash the order.
The Government thereafter issued a show cause numberice to the respondent stating why the punishment imposed upon him by the Superintendent of Police should number be enhanced.
From the judgment and order dated April 16, 1968 of the Mysore Court in W.P. No.
The respondent preferred an appeal to the Deputy Inspector General of Police but that was dismissed.
The respondent then filed a revision before the State Government under rule 17 of the Bombay Police Punishment and Appeal Rules, 1956, hereinafter called the Rules.
After hearing the respondent, the punishment was enhanced to one of dismissal by the Government.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
Mayakrishnan and N. R. Choudhury, for the respondent.
In the year 1962, disciplinary proceedings were companymenced against him.
V.Gupte and R. B. Datar for the appellants.
The Court therefore quashed the order of the Government enhancing the punishment.
2117 of 1968.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MATHEW, J. The respondent in this appeal started service as a police companystable in the State of Bombay in 1935.
The charge was that he was found missing from his post between 11.30 P.M. on March 21, 1962 and 3.30 P.M. on the next day.
He became an head companystable after he was allotted to the State of Mysore companysequent oil the reorganization of the states.
The Superintendent of Police found him guilty of the charge and demoted him as a police companystable.
2545 of 1965.
It is against this order that the appeal has been preferred, on certificate, by the State of Mysore.
