As a companysequence of the above circular, on appointment to the post and on companypletion of the probation for a period of two years, the candidate would be companyfirmed in the cadre as Civil Assistant Surgeon in the Bihar State Medical Service.
It is true that the respondent employees came to be appointed pursuant to the recommendations dated April 17, 1964 made by the Bihar State Public Service Commission and were appointed on September 29, 1964.
Circular dated September 20, 1965 issued by the Government with regard to the entitlement of the Army Officers is found in Annexure VI.
These appeals by special leave arise from the judgments of the Division Bench of the Patna High Court in CWJC Nos.7049/93 and 1801/90 made respectively on August 19, 1994 and December 6, 1994.
After discharge from the Army, he was appointed on regular basis on September 6, 1966.
AND CIVIL APPEAL NO.1579 OF 1996 Arising out of SLP C No.12432 of 1995 O R D E R Leave granted.
The appellant was admittedly appointed on temporary basis in March 1966 and thereafter he was drafted as a Commissioned Officer and served in the Army in defence of the companyntry in national emergency.
September 6, 1966 and thereby would become senior to the respondent employees though they were initially appointed on temporary basis w.e.f.
The respondent employees came to be appointed initially on September 29, 1964 on temporary basis and were then appointed on regular basis as Civil Assistant Surgeon w.e.f.
But all the appointments are only to temporary posts though they were selected by the Bihar Public Service Commission on regular basis.
The question is vexed inter se seniority of the appellant and the respondent employees in these cases.
We have heard the companynsel on both sides.
July 15, 1974.
September 29, 1964.
July 15, 1974.
