The draft scheme of the appellant was approved by the Board of Trustees by Circular Resolution dated 8 1 1 1993.
The scheme was duly scrutinised and examined by the SEBI and SEBI gave its approval and certain amendments were suggested.
Under such registration Morgan Stanley Asset Management India Private Limited is companystituted as the asset management companypany of the appellant.
Aggrieved by the same, the appellant moved the High Court in CM M No.
One Dr Arvind Gupta filed Writ Petition No.
Upon receipt of such approval for the scheme, the appellant and the Investment Manager took necessary steps to begin marketing the scheme by issue of advertisements.
14 of 1994 by the High Court of Delhi, civil appeal arising out of SLP No.
OP 3 i.e. SEBI is also directed number to issue clearances until Regulation 28 of Schedule V of SEBI Regulations is companyplied with by the OP 1 and OP 2.
That was subsequently companyfirmed on 4 1 1994.
OP 4 and OP 5 i.e. the bankers to the offer are specifically restrained from accepting any application form of Morgan Stanley Growth Fund from anybody until further orders from this learned Forum.
The scheme was duly scrutinised and examined by the SEBI.
543 of 1993.
Morgan Stanley Asset Management India Private Limited is it subsidiary of Morgan Stanley Group Inc. which holds 75 of equity, the balance being held by Indian shareholders such as Housing Development Finance Corporation HDFC , Stock Holding Corporation of India etc.
The appellant is managed by a Board of Trustees.
14 of 1994 against SEBI.
That writ petition was rejected.
All advertisements and publicity material were approved by SEBI in writing before publication as required by the Regulations.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MOHAN, J. Leave granted.
On 24 12 1993 an interim order was passed.
Next date fixed on 19 1 1994.
MF/005/93/1 dated 5 11 1993.
This was forwarded to SEBI for its approval on 10 11 1993.
In effect, he sought to stay the public issue from being floated.
272 of 1994 has companye to be preferred.
Pursuant to such approval tile appellant companymenced advertising the public issue.
Its Memorandum and Article of Association have also been approved by the SEBI as per the provisions of the said Regulations.
On 13 12 1993 the advertisements and hoardings were released.
The principal grounds taken were that the appellants Offering Circular was number approved by the SEBI.
321 of 1994 has companye to be preferred.
On 8 11 1993, the Board of Trustees by a circular Resolution approved the draft scheme, the same was forwarded to SEBI on 10 11 1993.
Morgan Stanley Asset Mana enient India Private Limited was ranted certificate of incorporation on 18 10 1993 by the Registrar of Companies, Bombay.
On the same rounds, as were urged in the writ petition, the respondent moved the Calcutta District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum seeking to restrain the public issue from being floated.
On 3 1 1994 the said order passed by the learned Sub Judge was stayed.
One Piyush Aggarwal filed a suit before the learned Sub Judge, Tees Hazari Courts, Delhi for injunction restraining the public issue from being floated by the appellant.
Ltd. was granted the certificate of incorporation on 12 10 1993 by the Registran of Companies, Bombay and its Memorandum and Articles of Association has also been approved by the SEBI as per the provisions of the said Regulations.
By its letter dated 23 11 1993, addressed to Enam Financial Consultants Pvt.
Aggrieved by this order, civil appeal arising out of SLP C No.
Against the dismissal of Writ Petition No.
Pursuant to the SEBI Mutual Fund Regulations, the investment management companypany of the appellant, Morgan Stanley Asset Management India Private Limited was registered with SEBI on 5 11 1993.
OPs are at liberty to apply for vacation variation of this order.
The appellant is a domestic mutual fund registered with Securities and Exchange Board of India hereinafter referred to as SEBI under Registration No.
