The order of the retirement impugned in the proceedings was to the following effect WHEREAS the President is of the opinion that it is in the public interest to do so.
The appellant was actually interviewed for the said post during May and June 1986.
Before the Tribunal the appellant companytended that he had a brilliant academic career and had a clean record of service his research projects had been highly praised and appreciated and he deserved promotion to the post of Director Scientist G F .
In August 1960, he was appointed as Senior Scientific Officer, Grade I in theDefence Science Laboratory, Delhi and in 1969 was promoted as Principal Scientific Officer.
Before the Tribunal the service records of the appellant were produced.
In February, 1986, he had made a representation to the authorities for redressed of personal grievances and while suggesting for improvement in the laboratory he had pointed out regarding the defective functioning of the Institution.
While serving in the said post he was prematurely retired by the impugned order.
The authorities developed bias against the appellant.
The President also directs that Dr. J.K. Sinha shall be paid a sum equivalent to the amount of his pay plus allowances for a period of 3 months calculated at the same rate at which he was drawing them immediately before his retirement.
This led to his number getting selected for the post of Director and ultimately to the making of the impugned order.
He acquired professional training in the Institute of Semi Conductor, Leningrad USSR, Leveder Institute of Physics, Moscow, and Rice University, Texas, USA.
The appellant was born on 27th March, 1931, and took the Masters Degree in Science in Physics in 1953 and obtained Ph.D. in microwave Physics from the University of London in 1959.
In August, 1973, he was further promoted as Deputy Chief Scientific Officer and posted in Defence Electronics Research Laboratory, Hyderabad.
These allegations were companyntered by the Department.
Ranganath Misra, J. This appeal by special leave and is directed against the decision of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad bench, dismissing the claim of the appellant and rejecting his challenge to the order dated 28th of November, 1986, retiring the appellant from service under Article 459 h of the Civil Services Regulations.
He also became a senior member of Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, USA and a member of the Institute of Electrical Engineers, London.
