Documents were forged while preparing the annual in come of the ex intermediary.
Briefly stated the facts are as follows The Jamindari of ex intermediary viz.
The first information report was filed against eight accused out of which six were Revenue Officers and two were private persons.
Two private persons filed a writ petition before the High Court and the High Court by the impugned order quashed the entire investi gation ignoring the fact that there were six government officials.
2001 Supp 5 SCR 355 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by PHUKAN, J. Lave granted.
243 of 1996.
On these allegations, the FIR was lodged in the police station.
It was alleged that the Government had to submit official assessment of the asset, which was made without proper jurisdiction by the six officers of the Government in companylusion with the respondents with the malafide intention of their vested interest.
Law is well settled regarding interference by the High Court with an investigation of a case.
Raghu Mahto vested in the State Government in terms of the provisions of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1955.
By the impugned judgment, the High Court quashed the investigation of a case, which was registered under Sections 419, 467, 420 and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
In this appeal by special leave the appellants have assailed the judgment dated December 09, 1999 of the High Court of Judicature at Patna passed in CRWJC No.
