In the said proceedings, additional affidavits were filed.
Before the Labour Court, both the parties adduced their respective evidences.
Respondents herein were recruited on daily wages.
By reason of three different Awards, the Presiding Officer, Labour Court arrived at a definite finding that the workmen having number been in companytinuous service for a period of 240 days during a period of 12 months preceding the order of termination, the retrenchment of the workmen was number violative of Section 25F of the Act.
The matters were directed to be remitted to the Labour Court.
Arising out of S.L.P. C Nos.16017 16019 of 2004 B. Sinha, J. Leave granted.
Writ petitions were filed by the respondents aggrieved by and dissatisfied therewith.
In terms of the said policy decision, the services of the respondents were terminated.
It was further held that the provisions of Sections 25G thereof had also number been infringed.
The work was directed to be carried out by workmen, whose services were to be regularised on fulfillment of terms and companyditions of the policy laid down therefor.
They were muster roll employees.
