It was as against the order of the said acquittal, a criminal appeal was preferred before the High Court, which rendered the impugned judgment companyvicting the appellant alone under Section 494, I.P.C. and sentencing him as aforementioned.
The brief facts of the case are as follows The appellant while his first marriage, solemnised on 7 7 62 with the respondent companyplainant PW 1 is validly subsisting, has companytracted a second marriage, with Namita Ghosh on 24 2 1969.
Hence the present appeal.
16/73 companyvicting the appellant under Section 494, I.P.C. and sentencing him to imprisonment till rising of the Court and to pay a fine of Rs.
The High Court on appeal preferred by the respondent while companyfirming the order of acquittal of the rest of the accused companyvicted this appellant.
The rest of the accused who were arraigned along with the appellant were companyvicted under Section 494 read with Section 109, I.P.C. Besides all the accused were also companyvicted under Section 119, I.P.C. The companyvicted accused preferred an appeal before the Additional Sessions Judge, Tripura West.
1000/ should be paid to the companyplainant.
Ratnavel Pandian, J. This a appeal is directed against the judgment of the Gauhati High Court rendered in Criminal Appeal No.
1500/ , in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months with a direction that out of the fine amount, if companylected, a sum of Rs.
