The Labour Court which adjudicated the matter in favour of the respondent holding that he had worked for 240 days and termination of his services being companytrary to provisions of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act in short the Act , is bad and directed his reinstatement with back wages.
2 hereinafter referred to as the respondent was employed as Trainee Technician on the Establishment of the Appellant by an order sent to him on February 29, 1989 which companytained Inter alia the following stipulations You will be on training for a period of one year from the date of joining.
On 28 1 1990, a letter was sent to him to the effect that he had absented himself from work from August 10, 1989 when he left Pune and had number returned to work at all.
You are requested to join on or before 1 3 1989.
He was transferred to work at Pune.
That award was challenged before the High Court.
During this period the Management may at its discretion withdraw the above facility of providing training to you at any time without assigning any reason whatsoever.
You will be companysidered for regular employment on satisfactory companypletion of your training.
The respondent raised an industrial dispute.
The respondent was working as a Trainee Service Technician at Gwalior.
Hence this appeal.
The respondent No.
Hence the preliminary objection is rejected.
