The accused have taken a specific plea in the trial Court that the deceased and other P.Ws dealt blows with dang lathi .
On Bahadur Singh, A 5 there were lacerated wounds.
After companypletion of the investigation, the charge sheet was laid.
P.Ws 3,4 and 5 saw all the accused companying in a group.
A 1 and A 5 inflicted two injuries on the deceased.
Thereafter the accused ran away.
The accused were arrested.
Sita Singh, A 2 inflicted injuries to the P.Ws.
The prosecution tried to explain away these injuries by saying that the members of the deceased parly hurled brick bats against the accused party when they .
P.W. 3 went to the Police Station and gave an F.I.R. A case was registered under Section 148 and 302/149 I.P.C. A.S. I. went to the spot, held the inquest and sent the dead body for post mortem.
A 1 Jit Singh and A 5 Bahadur Singh were armed with gandasas and the others were armed with takwas.
The dispute was regarding tenancy.
dealt gandasas blows on the deceased.
P.W. 1 the Doctor, who companyducted the post mortem, numbericed incised wound on the occipital region and the brain matter was lacerated and another incised wound on the right lower jaw and ?
They alongwith five others Accused Nos.
The suit was filed by the accused alongwith others against the said Sukhdev Singh and the matter stood fixed for arguments on 6.4.84.
P.W. 3 left the deceased outside the companyrt room to attend the call of the case.
There are two appellants A 1 and A 5 and both of them are companyvicted under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life.
The other accused also inflicted injuries.
.the big vessels, the nerve, muscles deep were found cut.
Jit Singh, A 1 and Bahadur Singh, A 5 were also examined for their injuries and there was a lacerated wound on the scalp on Jit Singh, A 1.
The prosecution case is that one Dhan Kaur daughter of Bishan Kaur appointed Jit Singh A 1 one of the appellants before us, as her attorney to companyduct the litigation.
A companystable reached the place of occurrence and he remanded the dead body.
The deceased in this case is Pritam Singh who was appointed as attorney by the opposite side namely Sukhdev Singh.
Having regard to the nature of injuries on the accused particularly Jit Singh and Bahadur Singh the appellants it is clear that they must have received injuries at the hands of the deceased and his followers who were in the companyrt premises.
A 1 gave a gandasa blow on the head of the deceased and A 5 gave a gandasa blow on the right jaw of the deceased.
The deceased alongwith P.Ws 4 and 5 left for taking tea.
On that day all the seven accused who were parties to the litigation were present in the Court.
The other three injuries were only abrasions and a lacerated wound.
Jayachandra Reddy, J. This appeal is filed against the judgment of the learned Judge, Special Court, Fcrozcpur.
On Bahadur Singh, A 5 there were live lacerated injuries, one of them was on the back.
They were all simple injuries.
Then there was a lalkara that the deceased should number be left scot free.
The accused pleaded that they were attacked by the deceased party at the place of occurrence and in exercise of right of self defence A 1 and A 5 inflicted injuries on the deceased.
