The original plaintiff is in SANJAY KUMAR Date 2019.11.25 113635 IST Reason appeal, aggrieved by the judgment of the High Court reversing the judgment and decree of the First Assistant Judge of the City Civil Court at Madras.
Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J 1 This appeal arises from a judgment dated 27 October 2006 of a learned Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Madras.
4 The case of the appellant is that the trust which was created by Bagyammal is a private family trust which would number attract the provisions of the Act of 1959.
A proceeding4 was instituted under Section 63 a before the Deputy Commissioner, HR and CE Administration Department seeking a declaration to that effect.
However, the Deed of Settlement dated 4 June 1926 marked as Exhibit A1 uses the expression Bagyammal.
On 21 March 1990, an appeal against the order of the Deputy Commissioner was dismissed by the first respondent.
On 3 October 1986, the Deputy Commissioner dismissed the proceeding.
He is stated to have taken over possession of the property and to have been in companytrol until his death in 1968.
have settled the property in favour of her son in law W S Natarajan Chettiar.
The appellant, as his son, claims to have succeeded to the property.
For the sake of companyvenience, this Court in the present judgment is using the term Bagyammal.
