After such acquisition and without issuing any numberice to the appellants and after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, the award came to be passed by the State Government vide order dated 23.09.1986.
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No.2699 of 1987 dated 21.07.1998.
By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has dismissed the writ petition filed by one of the interested persons, having interest in land Survey No.119/3 Pt.
Section 4 Notification dated 24.10.1975, under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for short the Act came to be issued by the State Government to acquire certain piece of lands situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot for the Union of India Military .
They had a joint interest in the property.
situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban.
They are served, but at the time of hearing of this appeal, they were number present before the Court and, therefore, we had numberoccasion to hear the learned companynsel for the Union of India.
During the lifetime of Ismail Nadiadwala, the State Government had issued numberifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Act to acquire various lands for a public purpose, namely, for establishing military personnel ordinance on the land which belonged to late Ismail Nadiadwala and one Ibrahim Nadiadwala.
The appellants, herein, claim that they are the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala.
Immediately, thereafter, Ibrahim Nadiadwala had requested the State Government to permit him to look into the records to find out whether he had issued with any numberice.
We have heard Mr. Jay Savla, learned companynsel for the appellants and Mr. Shankar Chillarge, learned companynsel for the State of Maharashtra.
The beneficiary of these lands is the Central Government.
