The learned single Judge, therefore, passed the order in the following terms There is force in this submission of the learned companynsel which is number opposed by the State companynsel.
2 of 1974 which came into force from April 1, 1974.
The accused appealed to the High Court against his companyviction and sentence.
It appears also from the judgment that the State did number oppose the aforesaid submission on behalf of the accused.
Although the accused gave his age as 19 years, according to the trial companyrt he appeared to be aged about 23 years.
442 of 1974.
442 of 1974 and it is this order of the High Court in revision that special leave was obtained by the appellant.
so the learned single Judge dismissed the appeal maintaining the companyviction and reduced the accuseds term of imprisonment to that already undergo by him and also maintained the sentence of fine.
Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and order dated the 10th January, 1973 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigharh in Criminal Revision No.
The revision was separately discussed by the High Court for the reasons recorded in Criminal Appeal No.
There is numberdoubt that prompt and proper medical attention alone saved the i appellant from death.
Incised wound 2 1/2 cm x 1 cm horizontal, spindle shaped 6 cm above the left anterior superior iliac spine Depth was number probed and edges were fresh.
The injured Suraj Bhan also filed a Criminal Revision Application being numbered as 606 of 1974 for enhancement of the sentence passed on the accused.
C. Mahajan, S. K. Mehta and K. R. Nagaraja for the Appellant.
Ram Sarup and R. A. Gupta for Respondent No.
Including the pre companyviction detention the accused served only one year and eight months of the sentence.
442 of 1974.
Incised wound 2 1/2 cm x 1 cm oblique, 6 cm on the left and 2 cm above injury No.
In the absence of an appeal against the judgment of the High Court in Criminal Appeal No.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
2 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by j, GOSWAMI, J. On April 19, 1973, the respondent Om Parkash hereinafter to be described as the accused inflicted as many as five stab wounds on the appellant Suraj Bhan.
606 of 1974.
The appellant had also to under go an operation.
It appears the State did number choose to prefer any appeal against the grossly inadequate sentence passed by the High Court.
Edges were fresh and depth was number probed.
1 S. Marwah and S. P. Nayar for Respondent No.
Incised wound 1 cm X 1/4 cm X 2 mm deep, horizontal 6 cm inner to end at the level of f left anterior superior iliac spine, edges were fresh.
Having said.
The appeal was numbered as Criminal Appeal No.
Depth number probed edges were fresh.
The injuries were very severe as will be found from the description given below Incised wound 5 cm x 2 cm x oblique spindle shape on the left side of the front of abdomen, 8 cm below the xiphisternum and 6 cm to the left of mid line.
1, spindle J shaped.
381 of 1975.
I am of the view that the ends of justice will be met if the term of imprisonment of the companyvict appellant is reduced to that already undergone by him.
The appeal was decided by a learned single Judge of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana on January 10, 1975.
Penetrating wound 5 cm x 2 1/2 cm x cavity deep, horizontal on the front of abdomen 2 cm to the right of mid line 10 cm below the level of xiphisternum, edges were clean cut and fresh the companyls of small intestine protruding through the wound.
