On 1st July, 1999 Respondents 1 2 were removed from trusteeship.
Allegation of mis management of the 4th Respondent Trust and its properties are also made.
8355/99 before the Principal City Civil Judge, Bangalore under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure claiming that there was forgery of the purported letter dated 11th February, 1999 by which Respondent No.
Their submissions were number accepted and the Court granted leave on 10th November, 1999.
On 28th September, 1999 the Respondents instituted Suit No.
According to the Appellants, Respondent No.
Disputes having arisen between the 1st Appellant and his wife 3rd Appellant resulted in a number of litigations including this litigation.
The Appellants opposed grant of leave.
3 resigned from the trusteeship of the 4th Respondent Trust on 11th February, 1999.
Appellants 2 3 are the father and mother of the 1st Appellant.
3 had supposedly resigned.
Removal of the Appellants as trustees is prayed for.
The Revision filed by the Appellants was dismissed on 11th February, 2000.
4th Respondent is a educational trust which has been brought into existence with the 1st Appellant as the Founder Chairman Trustee along with Respondents as fellow Trustees.
A prayer is also made for cancellation of a Lease of the Trust properties granted in favour of Appellants 2 3.
Appellants 2 and 3 were inducted as additional Trustees on 15h March, 1999.
Under Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 a suit can only be filed by the Advocate General or by two or more persons having an interest in the trust after having obtained the leave of the Court.
N. VARIAVA, J. This Appeal is against the Judgment of the Karnataka High Court dated 4th October, 2001.
Briefly stated the facts are as follows 1st Appellant is the husband of the 3rd Appellant.
