Challenging the same, the plaintiff respondents filed C.A. No.61 of 1992 on the file of the District Judge, Kangra at Dharamshala.
404, 415 and 465 measuring 1.10.73 Hectares in Mohal and Mauza Bhatehad, Tehsil Dharamshala, District Kangra.
By judgment and decree dated 29.02.1992, the suit was dismissed being barred by limitation.
404, 415 and 465 made in the revenue record are number companyrect as wrongly shown the defendants appellants herein in the companyumn of owners and prayed for possession in alternative.
The High Court by the impugned order partly allowed the appeal holding that the plaintiffs are in possession in part of the land companyprising Khasra Nos.
Heard Mr. Dhruv Mehta, learned companynsel for the appellants and Mr. Himinder Lal, learned companynsel for the respondents.
267 of 1993 whereby the High Court modified the decree and judgment dated 1.05.1993 passed by the District Judge, Kangra at Dharamshala.
The District Judge, by order dated 01.05.1993, dismissed the appeal with some modification passed by the trial Court.
The subject matter of the dispute relates to Khasra Nos.
The defendants appellants filed written statement and opposed the suit on the ground that civil companyrt has numberjurisdiction to adjudicate any question with regard to companyferment of proprietary right in respect of the land in dispute, that the suit is barred by limitation, and that the defendants are in possession for the last 60 70 years and earlier his predecessor in interest were in possession of the suit land.
404 is companycerned.
NON REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO.
1304 OF 2002 Sathasivam, J. This appeal is directed against the judgment and final order dated 12.08.1999 of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in R.S.A. No.
Based on the oral and documentary evidence, more specifically revenue records produced before the trial Court, it has companye to the companyclusion that Khasra No.
On 19.7.1990, the original plaintiff, predecessors of respondents herein filed a suit for declaration that the entries with regard to Khasra Nos.
Aggrieved by the said order, the respondents filed R.S.A. No.
267 of 1993 before the High Court of Himachal Pradesh.
404, 415 and 465.
Against the said order, the appellants have filed this appeal by way of special leave.
404 has been in possession of the original defendant and Khasra Nos.
The facts which are necessary for the disposal of this appeal are as under The dispute between the parties is in respect of land companyprising of Khasra Nos.
