Respondents were arrested.
An application for quashing the said FIR was filed before the High Court.
Admittedly, the first respondent married again in 1998.
As per the advice of the officers of the said Police Station as also the relatives of the parties, they entered into an agreement for divorce on or about 24.7.1996.
Appellant also received a sum of Rs.25,000/ towards permanent alimony which was acknowledged by granting a stamped receipt therefor.
The said purported divorce is said to have taken place in terms of the custom prevailing in the companymunity the which the parties belong.
A First Information Report FIR was lodged pursuant to the said companyplaint which was registered as Crime No.5 of 2006.
She allegedly filed a companyplaint before the All Women Police Station at Virudhunagar.
No.1641 of 2007 REPORTABLE B. Sinha, J. Leave granted.
He has two children out of the said wedlock.
1, 2 and 3 herein, i.e., her husband and parents in law in May, 2006 before the Women Cell at Chennai, inter alia, on the premise that the first respondent has married for the second time which fact she came to learn on receipt of a summons in respect of a petition filed by the first respondent under Section 13 1 a of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
An enquiry was directed to be companyducted.
Appellant, however, filed a companyplaint petition against the respondent Nos.
Arising out of SLP Crl.
It was registered in the office of the Joint Sub Registrar, Virudhunagar being Registration No.146 of 1996.
The parties indisputably are living separately since 1996.
Appellant is an advocate.
She was married to Respondent No.1 on or about 1.12.1993.
