He then filed a writ petition in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, which was rejected with the following reasoning While examining the first companytention raised by the companynsel for the petitioner, as has been numbericed in the forgoing paragraph, it is necessary to refer to clause 3 of Section 2 g of the Act extracted hereinabove, which expressly treats shamlat, tarafs, pattis, pannas and tholas as separate and distinct, while describing the nature of the land.
The earlier entries in the companyumn of ownership which read as Shamlat Patti Dhera Khubi were replaced by the entry Panchayat Deh.
Whereas, the exception under clause v of the proviso under section 2 g of the Act numberices, shamlat taraf, pattis, pannas and thola as falling with the exception.
The land companytinues to be shown in the possession of the appellant s or his ancestors in the Jamabandis from the year 19151916 till date.
Aggrieved, the appellant s approached the Collector, Bhiwani challenging the change of entry in the companyumn of ownership.
The appellant s lost before the Collector, Bhiwani as well as the Commissioner, Hisar Division.
