kaliyappan thought that the envelope companytained a petition but on opening it he found that it companytained currency numberes.
at the same time he presented to this police officer a closed envelope.
p 1 in which he companyplained against the village munsif.
by that time the orderly turned up.
p 2 to the inspector of ramanathapuram circle directing him to take steps to see that peace was preserved in the village.
kali yappan on june 13 1954.
the appellant accordingly entered his office room when he again complained to the deputy superintendent of police against the village munsif.
the appellant was tried by the special judge of tiruchirappalli under s. 165a of the indian penal companye for attempting to bribe mr.
kaliappan then dictated the memo.
appeal from the judgment and order dated october 31 1956 of the madras high companyrt in criminal appeal number 20/1956.
subsequently during the police investigation torn bits of paper were companylected from near the office window and it is alleged that those torn bits of paper were the pieces of the envelope in which the currency numberes were presented to mr.
on june 14 1954 according to the prosecution the appellant went to mr.
r. ganapathy iyer and t. m. sen for the respondent.
kaliyappan.
thereafter mr.
by that time the camp clerk p.w.
2 had arrived.
against the order of acquittal the state of madras appealed to the high companyrt of madras under s. 417 of the companye of criminal procedure.
kaliyappan asked the appellant to produce the envelope which he had thrown down and which the appellant had picked up.
on june 5 1954 the appellant met mr.
kaliyappans bungalow at about 7 15 a.m. who was at that time looking into certain papers.
kaliyappan the deputy superintendent of police at ramanathapuram and companyplained against the inspector of police of ramanathapuram circle and the sub inspector requesting the s deputy superintendent of police to look into the matter personally and number to leave the investigation exclusively in the hands of the inspector.
kaliyappan also in view of the situation had directed this police officer to see whether steps should number be taken to seize the revolver of the appellants brother rashid for which he had a licence.
the inspector of ramanathapuram circle thereafter prepared a detailed report ext.
kaliyappan at the central bus stand at madurai and handed over to him a petition ext.
b. dadachanji b. aggarwala s. n. andley j. rameshwar nath and p. l. vohra for the appellant.
criminal appellate jurisdiction criminal appeal number 137 of 1957.
the special judge came to the conclusion that the charge framed against the accused had number been established.
on the night of june 13 1954 at about 10 p.m. the appellant went to the bungalow of mr.
500 in currency numberes requesting him to drop action registered against the appellant at keelakarai police station.
the appellant had in the meantime remained in the office room and on the appearance of the orderly mr.
this police officer was also asked to take action against the offenders with respect to whom there was evidence in companynection with the occurrence of june 3 1954.
kaliyappan told the appellant that he knew numberhing about the case and companyld number say or do anything off hand and that the appellant should see him about a week later by which time he would have perused the record and would be in a position to look into his grievances.
the deputy superintendent of police called his office orderly but as there was no response he went out of the office room and told his milk maid to get the camp clerk.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by imam j. this is an appeal on a certificate granted by the high companyrt of madras.
according to the appellant however the deputy superintendent of police had asked him to companye to him next morning.
he threw the envelope at the appellants face but the envelope fell down on the floor and the appellant picked it up.
the list so prepared is ext.
k. daphtary solicitor general of india h. j. umrigar and t. m. sen for the intervener union of india .
on june 12 1954 mr.
the appellant after taking out of his pocket some currency numberes placed them on the table without the envelope.
kaliyappan asked the camp clerk to numbere down the numbers of the currency numberes which he did.
he was informed that a visitor bad companye to see him.
he was annumbered at the companyduct of the appellant.
he accordingly acquitted the appellant.
p 5 to the local sub magistrate informing the latter that the appellant bad offered him rs.
kaliyappan asked his orderly to put office rubber stamp date seal on the numberes and the same was done.
p 7 of the result of his enquiry and handed it over to mr.
1960 february 26.
kaliyappan deputy superintendent of police of ramanathapuram.
kalivappan made ail endorsement on this petition directing the inspector of ramanathapuram circle to send for both the parties and warn them against doing acts which would create a breach of the peace in the village and that this petition was number to be sent to the sub inspector w. 8 as it was alleged that he was siding against the appellant.
the high companyrt came to the conclusion that the evidence established that the appellant had attempted to bribe the aforesaid deputy superintendent of police.
kaliyappan sent a memo ext.
