From the Judgment and Order dated 28.4.1978 of the Allahabad High Court in Second Civil Appeal No.
This is a landlords appeal by special leave arising out of a suit for ejectment.
The validity of the numberice to quit was challenged by the respondent.
It was number addressed and served on the other tenants.
The respondents father B.M. Paul, was the tenant of the premises in question.
It was companytended that numberice should have been addressed to all the members of the family and served on them, and in the absence of numberice to all the suit was incompetent.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by PATHAK, CJ.
300 of 1975.
A numberice under s. 106 of the Transfer of Property Act terminating the tenancy was addressed to the respondent and was served on him.
3342 of 1979.
Vivek Ghambir and Praveen Kumar for the Respondent.
On his death he left behind the re spondent, his mother, brothers and sisters who in herited the tenancy.
P. Rana and Raju Ramachandran for the Appellant.
A suit for ejectment was filed by the appellant against the respondent.
