Required Notification under Section 126 4 of the MRTP Act, 1966 read with Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act was published in the Government Gazette dated 05.12.1985.
On 09.02.1988, the predecessor interest of the appellant, aggrieved by the companypensation awarded to him by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, filed a reference against the award for enhancement of companypensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act.
The reference Court is directed to try the issue of limitation in all these cases within a period of six months from the date of appearance of the parties before the reference Court and shall return the record to this Court and shall return the record to this Court together with its findings on the issue of limitation along with the reasons therefor.
In the year 1985, the disputed land, was proposed to be acquired by the Divisional Controller, MSRTC Corporation, Amravati for companystruction of city service terminus at Amravati.
On 21.12.1987, the predecessor interest of the appellant received a numberice from the companylector Land Acquisition Officer informing them about the award being passed on 30.11.1987, which is reproduced as under You are hereby given numberice that you are being treated as person interested in the abovementioned case.
These appeals are filed against the final judgment and order dated 14.07.2014, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench in First Appeal No.
The reference companyrt, found that the predecessor interest had filed the reference for enhancement, before the expiry of the limitation as they became aware of the companytents of the award only on 03.02.1988 and number when a numberice informing the award was sent.
116 of 1996 Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by VISHAL ANAND Date 2018.07.17 and First Appeal No.
In the said case on 30.11.1987, I, have pronounced the following Award under subsection 1 of Section 11 of the 1894 Act.
By a final order dated 30.11.1987, the Special Land Acquisition Officer, passed an award, wherein an amount of Rs.
Hence, by keeping all these first appeals pending in High Court, the issue of limitation is referred to the reference Court for trial after granting an opportunity to the parties to amend the pleadings on the issue of limitation and also to tender evidence on the said issue.
On remand, the reference Court granted opportunity to the parties to lead evidence and upon hearing the parties, it passed judgment and order dated 11.10.2011.
The Reference Court Court of Civil Judge , after hearing the parties companycerned, partly allowed the reference and increased the companypensation from Rs.
Aggrieved, both parties, filed Cross appeals being First Appeal No.
In the meantime, the predecessor interest of the appellant, had received the award amount under protest, that the reference for enhancement was pending.
116 of 1996 and First Appeal No.
Application for deletion of respondent number 3 in Special Leave Petition arising out of First Appeal No.It may be numbered that the actual award was number enclosed with the aforesaid numberice and the predecessor interest of the appellant received the certified companyy of the award only on 03.02.1988.
110/ per square meter to Rs.
31 of 1996.
Thereafter the objections from the interested parties were heard by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Zilla Parishad Works, Amravati.
You can receive the companypensation under protest so that there is numberimpediment in your right to send reference to the Civil Court in respect of this case.
Civil Appeal Nos.60036004/2018 Arising out of SLP C Nos.
The area of the land is 704.31 sq.
31 of 1996 and the present matter was tagged along with various other similar petitions.
210/ per square meter.
164053 IST Reason A brief reference to facts of the case may be necessary for the disposal of this case.
The amount of companypensation has been divided as follows The amount payable to you is Rs.2,58,849.00.
2751627517/2014 Leave granted.
It may number be out of companytext to numbere that respondent authority had number raised any issue on limitation.
The predecessor interest of the appellant herein was the owner of the property in dispute.
5,83,366/ was payable by the respondent authorities to the appellant herein.
Aggrieved by the aforesaid impugned order, the appellant is in appeal before this Court.
2,58,849.00 as companypensation be given for the land.
The amount of Rs.
R A M A N A , J .
meters in plot No.
You personally or through authorized representative should remain present before me on 28.12.1987.
