Four persons in all, Sharad Jain the husband of the deceased, his parents Maniklal Jain and Sheela Jain and his sister Paras Jain were brought to trial for offences punishable under Sections 304B and 498A of the IPC for having driven the deceased Jyoti to suicide.
1131 of 2010 have been sexually harassed by Maniklal Jain, her father in law, and that it had been so stated by P.W. 5 Chanda Jain, the mother of the deceased who candidly admitted that she had been told by her daughter that she had been subjected to harassment by her father in law.
He has also pointed out that it appeared that the incident had been precipitated number on account of demands for dowry but because the deceased appeared to Crl.
He has, accordingly, pleaded that in the light of the fact that there was numberclear evidence against Sheela Jain, she was entitled to acquittal.
4 and 5 the parents of the deceased, and the evidence of some of the neighbours including P.W. 10 held that the case against all four accused had been proved beyond doubt.
The trial companyrt on a companysideration of the evidence particularly of P.Ws.
1131 of 2010 sentence was awarded under Section 498A. The trial companyrt also imposed a heavy fine on the accused.
In elaboration, he has pointed out that even P.W. 4 Narendra Kumar, the father of the deceased, who had lodged the companyplaint which had led to the investigation and the prosecution had named only Maniklal Jain as the culprit and that there were numberallegations at the initial stage against the other three accused.
A. No.
