11.38.
2000 60 2300 EB 75 3200 on the same lines as adopted for Audit stream and thereafter take necessary action to implement these orders.
THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 1998 Present Honble Mrs. Justice Sujata V.Manohar Honble Mr. Justice D.P.Wadhwa Mr. S.K.Mehta, Mr, Dhruv Mehta, Mr. Fazlin Anam and Ms. Shobha Verma, Advocates for the appellants.
The respective cadre companytrolling authorities may number take necessary action to prescribe criteria for appointment to the higher functional grades requiring promotion to the grades of Rs.
Mrs. K. Amreshwari, Sr.
The Controller General of Accounts has stated that the statutory audit functions performed by the staff of IAAD are in numberway unique as the Internal audit functions of the civil accounts staff under his organisation include most of the audit functions performed by the statutory audit staff.
As regards criteria for appointment to the higher functional grades requiring promotion to the grades of Rs.1400 40 1600 50 2300 EB 60 2600 and Rs.
As a result, higher pay scales were give to 80 per cent of the staff on the audit side.
1400 40 1600 50 2300 EB 60 2600 and Rs.
2000 60 2300 EB 75 3200, orders will follow.
They have also claimed that the duties and responsibilities performed by them and the staff on the audit side of IAAD are companyparable.
1.1.1986 and number from 1.4.1987 as was granted by the respondents.
Advocates, Mr. A.K.Sharma and Ms. Anjani Ayyengar, Advocates with her for the respondents.
1.1.1986 on numberional basis and make actual payment of the differential amount companysequent to re fixation of pay in the revised scales w.e.f.
2000 3200 be also granted the Group B status like their companynterparts in the office of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India CAG and the Controller General of Defence Accounts CGDA .
They have pointed out that there was parity all along, which was disturbed in March, 1984 when there was a restructuring of IAAD into two separate cadres, i.e. audit cadre and accounts establishment cadre.
The all India Defence Accounts Association had also filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court requesting the Honble Court to direct the government for bringing the pay scales of auditors and Section officers working in the Defence Accounts Department at par with those in the IAAD.
The writ petition was however allowed to be withdrawn by the Supreme Court as both the parties agreed that the questions raised in the petition would be better decide by this Commission.
1.4.1987.
Railway have pointed out that their accounts cadre had a traditional parity with audit which should be maintained companysidering the diversity, nature and quality of their work.
Against this part of the relief granted to the appellants by the Tribunal, Union of India came in appeal in this Court and by judgment dated July 15, 1994 1995 Supp 3 SCC 600 the companyrt reversed the decision of the Tribunal and held that the appellants would be entitled to revised pay scales only with effect from 1.4.1987.
The Tribunal directed the respondents to fix the appellants in the revised scales of pay w.e.f.
The appellants had also raised another issue before the Tribunal that they should also be granted revised pay scale of Rs.
The Departments of PT have suggested that whatever pay scales are given to the accounts staff in other departments, should be given to the accounts staff in these departments also.
2000 3200 w.e.f.
