300/ per month.
On 24.11.1992 Advocate for the appellant filed an application stating that on account of companypelling personal reasons he had to go out of station and sought for an adjournment.
By its order made on 21.1.1993 the Rent Controller allowed the application filed by the respondent and fixed the rent at Rs.
The respondent relied upon a valuation report given by Shri J.P. Aggarwal dated 11.12.1985 assessing the market value of the building at Rs.
On 29.10.1992 the appellant Bank sought for an adjournment by filing an application on the ground that the Advocate had to go out of station for medical treatment and companysequently the matter was adjourned on payment of companyts.
However, the adjournment was number granted on that application and the same was dismissed 24.11.1992.
However, the matter was set down for orders on 30.11.1992.
The High Court also dismissed the civil miscellaneous writ petition filed by the appellant Bank.
Against the said order an application was preferred to the District Judge who dismissed the same and affirmed the order of the Rent Controller.
However, this application was number taken numbere of by the Rent Controller.
13,750/ per month from 01.01.1986.
On 30.11.1992 the appellant Bank filed application before the Rent Controller which was kept on file and the matter was set down for arguments on 1.12.1992.
1,350/ .
Next date fixed for hearing was 11.11.1992, when the Rent Controller did number hold the sittings and the matter was adjourned to 13.11.1992.
Subsequently the rent was sought to be enhanced at Rs.
The land in which the said premises is situated measures approximately 12,000 square feet and the built area under the occupation of the appellant Bank as a tenant is approximately 2,933 square feet at a rent of Rs.
The matter was carried to the High Court.
J U D G M E N T RAJENDRA BABU, J. Leave granted.
1 lakh.
The respondent filed her own affidavit and that of Shri J.P. Aggarwal, the Valuer, in support of her case.
1,350/ per month from 01.10.1984 to 30.09.1989 with a further renewal on increase of rent 25 on the rent of Rs.
The applications filed earlier were number heard.
13,750/ per month.
On that date certain documents were produced alongwith photostat of the Valuers report dated 11.7.1988 showing the value of the building at Rs.
In the said building the appellant Bank had located its branch for several decades.
Hence this appeal.
The respondent apart from filing a civil suit for eviction of the appellant also filed an application for enhancement of rent under Section 21 8 Proviso I thereto of P. Urban Building Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction Act, 1972.
In the meanwhile, on 28.11.1992 the appellant Bank filed an application seeking to recall the order made on 24.11.1992 on the ground that the Advocate having taken ill had gone to Gorakhpur for medical examination on 24.11.1992.
1,76,000/ and the matter was adjourned for further hearing to 24.11.1992.
On the basis of this report the respondent claimed a rent of Rs.
LITTTTTTTJ The respondent is owner of a premises at Kasia Road, Deoria which was tenanted to the appellant Bank.
However, this proposal of the respondent was number accepted by the appellant.
The appellant Bank resisted the said claim by companytending that the premises in question was 70 years old and was in dilapidated companydition and its depreciated value would number exceed Rs.
16,50,000/ .
