The Rent Controller as well as the appellate tribunal companycurrently held that the appellant landlord had been able to prove all the three grounds on which the eviction was claimed, namely, i the default in payment or rent ii bana fide personal need for doing jewellery business and iii for demolition and reconstruction of the building.
The appellant landlord claimed that he was companyducting jewellery business from rented premises and he had numberother number residential premises in the city of Coimbatore.
The premises in question was located in the business center of the city of Coimbatore surrounded on all sides by multi storeyed buildings.
His case was that he was companyducting business in jewellery from a rented premises belonging to the municipality.
The High Court, by its impugned judgment and order of 21st October, 1997, set aside the companycurrent findings recorded by the appellate tribunal and the Rent Controller and dismissed the suits for eviction.
The matter ultimately came up before the High Court of Judicature at Madras in C.R.P. Nos.
2196 of 1992 and 2197 of 1992.
