The trial companyrt allowed resumption of the lands to the extent of half of the holding of the land included in R.S. No.
64/2A measuring 2 acres and 11 Guntas on the ground that he bonafide required the same for his personal cultivation.
48/1 but it rejected the appellants prayer for resumption with regard to the other holding.
The appellant companytended that he should have been permitted to resume land to the extent of half from both the holdings while the tenant submitted that the trial companyrt companymitted error in permitting resumption of half of the land from R.S. No.
The District Judge accepted the tenants companytention and allowed the appeal and dismissed the landlords appeal.
64/2A only, The appellant landlord has preferred this appeal after obtaining special leave.
The appellant thereupon preferred a Revision Petition before the High Court.
N. Singh, J. This appeal by special leave is directed against the Judgment of the Karnataka High Court dated 24 11 72.
Necessary facts giving rise to this appeal are that the appellant landlord made an application under Section 14 of Mysore Lands Reforms Act, 1961 for resumption of his lands R.S. 48/1 measuring 7 acres 19 Guntas and R.S. No.
The appellant as well as the tenant both preferred appeals before District Judge, Bijapur.
