The appellant who companytested the election as a Marxist Communist Party of India candidate for a seat to the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly in the elections held on December 5, 1994, lost to respondent No.
1 alleging irregularities during companynting and sought ai recount of votes.
1, who had companytested the election as a candidate fielded by Telugu Desam Party by a narrow margin of 87 votes.
After evidence was led by the parties, the learned Single Judge of the High Court dismissed the election petition with companyts.
5, 6, 7 and 9 as alleged as well as in the result sheet supplied?
1 and from the pleadings of the parties, the following issues were framed Whether there are any discrepancies in the companynting of votes in round Nos.
Whether the Returning Officer has violated the instructions of the Election Commission of India in proceeding with the companynting of votes, if so, to what effect?
The appellant filed an election petition challenging the election of respondent No.
The election petition was companytested by respondent NO.
Ramavaram, Advi Rangapur, Musmi and Dubbagudem.
Whether the election petitioner is entitled to seek recount of votes?
28,35,191 and 200, viz.,
Hence, this appeal.
