The High Court held that so far as the offence under ss.
281/67, 282/67 and 257/67.
companyld number be proceeded.
The Registrar, with the permission of the Chief Justice of the High Court, reported the matter to the Inspector General of Police, U.P., who ordered the Criminal Investigation Department of U.P. to investigate into the matter and ultimately three charge sheets were submitted for offences under.
From the Judgment order dated 9.11.78 of the Allahabad High Court in Criminal Misc.
The enquiry further revealed that in several other cases also companyrt fee stamps had been taken out from the original files and reused in new cases.
23,007.50 p. on 15 sheets were missing from the judicial file of First Appeal No.
100 each in First Civil Appeal Nos.
The relevant portion of s. 195 1 b may be extracted thus 195.
467, 471 and 120B, I.P.C. were companycealed as they fell within the ambit of s. 165 1 b ii of the Code, numbercognizance companyld be taken by the Magistrate without a companyplaint being filed.
461 466 of 1980.
903 908 of 1984 Dalveer Bhandari H.M. Singh for the appellant.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal Nos.
1655, 1656, 1657, 1691 and 1698 of 1979.
AND Special Leave Petition Nos.
Pramod Swarup for the petitioner in SLP Nos.
The Registrar of the High Court suspected that a well organised gang of racketeers was operating in the High Court to defraud the Government by surreptitiously removing the used stamps from the judicial files and re using them in new cases.
Application Nos.
186 of 1960.
903 908 of 1984.
It is Common ground that numbercomplaint as required by the mandatory provisions of s. 195 of the Code having been made, the proceedings.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by FAZAL ALI, J. These appeals by special leave arise out of a judgment dated January 9, 1979 of the Allahabad High Court refusing to quash the proceedings in toto which were pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Allahabad, in exercise of the powers under s. 482, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 hereinafter to be referred to as the Code .
Govindan Nair and Pramod Swarup for the respondent.
When the matter was detected, an enquiry was ordered and the Judicial Department of the High Court reported to the Registrar that companyrt fee stamps of the value of Rs.
