Appellant herein along with Anil Shivram Pawar Accused No.1 , Premraj Hirman Chaudhary Accused No.
Bhaulal Jadhav was an accused in a case of murder of the father of the appellant and accused No.
Bhaulal also tried to save himself by running away from the said place.
Bhaulal and some 8 9 persons were said to have companymitted the murder of Hiraman, father of Accused Nos.
3 has number preferred any appeal.
An attempt to rescue the deceased by PW 4 resulted in a threat to him, whereupon he started running towards Jalgaon.
The nature of the injuries suffered by him as also opinion of the doctor is number in question.
At about 12.45 p.m. he died.
Allegedly, when cremation of Hiraman was taking place, the appellant took a vow to take revenge of murder of his father.
Premraj Accused No.
PW 4 immediately went to the Taluka Police Station Jalgaon on a vehicle of a passer by.
He was chased by Accused Nos.
2, 3 and 4.
They had gone to Onkareshwar and Saptashringi Gad in the District of Nasik.
Bhaulal deceased on or about 13.02.1991 at about 11.00 a.m. was going to Jalgaon on a motorcycle.
A First Information Report was lodged at about 11.45 a.m. Bhaulal was taken to the hospital in a tractor.
At the trial, the prosecution examined 17 witnesses.
According to the said witness, injuries number.
They were, however, acquitted.
He was accompanied by Lotu Eko Patil PW 4 .
from Jalgaon, the accused persons who were in a Maruti van parked the vehicle by the side of road got down.
3 and Bapu Gangaram Shantaram Salunkhe Accused No.4 were tried for companymitting the murder of one Bhaulal Jadhav.
2 and 3, wherefor a criminal case was initiated against them.
3 is said to have caught hold Bhaulal and Manilal Accused No.2 and Gangaram Accused No.
We have numbericed hereinbefore that PW 4 was the informant.
5 and 13 were on the vital parts of the body and were sufficient in the ordinary companyrse of nature to cause death.
The motorcycle was stopped by Accused Nos.
4 inflicted stab injuries with knives.
Lotu Eco Patil PW 4 and Govinda Shamrao Marathe PW 5 were examined as eye witnesses to the occurrence.
2 and 3 and was again assaulted with knives.
When they were at distance of about 3 k.m.
B. SINHA, J One Manilal Hiraman Chaudhari is before us being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 17.10.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench at Aurangabad.
PW 5 was the driver of the Maruti van, which was taken on hire by the accused persons.
