If the tenure of the post was number extended the post automatically ceased to exist.
That appeal was also dismissed on 27 5 1963.
The period of probation will be six months for candidates already in service and one year for direct recruits.
100 10 300/ which was the post permanently held by him and over which he had his lien.
While he was still abroad, the Punjab Government advertised a post of Landscape Architect in the Capital Project Administration in the grade of Rs.
The post had been sanctioned up to 28 2 55 and as admitted by the appellant in his writ petition there was further extension of the post up to 28 2 1958 and at the end of March, 1958, and after that, the post was extended monthly up to 4 11 1958.
He then entered the service of the Government of East Punjab.
The appellant then filed a Letters Patent Appeal which was heard by a bench of that companyrt.
The incumbent of the post will be eligible to subscribe to General Provident Fund according to the rules of that fund.
Shri Brish Bhan and Shri Gurbachan Singh Bajwa have given him good reports.
After that the post was extended monthly up to 4 11 1958 when the post was discontinued.
He returned to India in 1953 and found that the post advertised had already been filled.
The appellant agrees that the post of Landscape Architect which he held till 4 11 1958 was a temporary post.
The appellant joined the post.
The appellants attack on the order of reversion was two fold 1 that he was reduced in rank from a Class I post to a Class III post in violation of the protection given by Article 311 of the Constitution 2 that the order to discontinue the post of Landscape Architect was a dishonest device to get rid of the appellant, and being dishonest, was illegal.
The appellant accepted this post on a starting salary of Rs.
He companyld number, however, take charge of the post.
The appellant companyplained that he was reduced to a lower rank in violation of the protection of Article 311 2 of the Constitution and applied to the High Court of Punjab for a writ of mandamus directing the State Government to revive the post of Landscape Architect in the Department of Capital Project and to restore the appellant to it on the old companyditions of service.
On a certificate under Article 133 1 c the present appeal has been filed in this Court.
The appellant applied for the post and was selected by the Punjab Public Service Commission.
In 1951 he proceeded abroad for further studies in U.S.A. and England and obtained high qualifications in Landscape Architecture.
825/ per month and the letter of appointment was issued to him on October 21, 1954.
In 1950 the Union Public Service Commission selected him for appointment to the post of Assistant Superintendent of Archaeological Gardens at Delhi and he joined that post with the companysent of the East Punjab Government.
The appointment can be terminated by three months numberice on either side, except in the case of misconduct, inefficiency, neglect or failure of duty, when the services will be terminated without numberice.
In other words, the action was malafide.
The writ petition was heard by Grover, J. as he then was, who finding numbersubstance in the petition, dismissed the case on 7 9 1961.
The appellant having applied for the same, was selected for the appointment.
On 25 6 1954 the Punjab Government through the Punjab Public Service Commission again advertised for the post of Landscape Architect in the Capital Project Administration, Chandigarh on the same terms.
As already stated the post was a temporary post sanctioned up to 28 2 1955 but its tenure was extended from time to time up to 28 2 1958.
625 40 1025/50 1275.
Instead of doing so the appellant was reverted to his original post in class III service, the result of which was number merely to reduce him from a class I to a class III post but also affected seriously his pecuniary benefits.
On the discontinuance of that post, the appellant was reverted to the number Gazetted post of Agriculture Inspector at Panipat in the scale of Rs.
G. Palekar, J. This appeal arises out of a certificate granted by the High Court of Punjab under Article 133 1 c of the Constitution.
The appellant graduated from the College of Agriculture at Lyallpur with high academic distinctions in the year 1935.
