The licenses relating to them were purchased as follows I On 30 7 50 for rights in Gerasar Prawn for 1955 56 On 2 8 50 for rights in Jayamal Prawn for 1955 56 On 18 9 51 for rights in Solakudi Prawn for 1955 56 On 6 5 52 for rights in Jayamal Chungudi for 1956 57 1957 58 1958 59 It will be seen that though the licenses were acquired before the estate vested in the State of Orissa they were for future years, all after the date of vesting.
Under Article 32 of the Constitution for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights.
The lake is divided into sections and this petition is companycerned with four of them.
from fisheries within the said lake.
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Petition No.
Mahapatra and G. C. Mathur, for the petitioners.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by BOSE J. This judgment will also govern Petitions Nos.
287, 288, 289 and 304 of 1955.
The further facts are set out in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the petition in the following terms That the petitioners carry on the business of catching and selling fish particularly.
286 of 1955.
The State of Orissa refused to recognise these licenses and were about to re auction the rights when the petitioners filed the present petition seeking writs under article 32 on the ground that their fundamental rights under articles 19 1 f and 31 I were, or were about to be, infringed.
October 27.
286 of 1955.
K. Daphtary, Solicitor Generalfor India, Porus A. Mehta and P. G. Gokhale, with him , for respondent No.
The others follow the same pattern.
The Act came into force on 9 2 1952.
