One such writ petition Civil Misc.
Some of them were appointed on the same basis in the next succeeding year or after a gap of one or two years.
85101/VA 429 dated 26.11.1987, I have been directed to inform that a result of arrear of companyying work in various Registration Offices of the State undue delay is being caused in the return of original documents to the parties.
filed at the Lucknow Bench of the High Court had been allowed by a learned single Judge S.H.A. Raza J. and the special leave petition Civil No.
On May 12, 1978 the Uttar Pradesh Registration Department District Establishment Ministerial Service Rules, 1978 hereinafter referred to as the 1978 Rules were published.
In 1989 the Registration Act, 1908 was amended by the State legislature of U.P. and Section 32 A was inserted whereby it was provided that the document presented for registration should be accompanied by such number of true photostat companyies there of as may be prescribed by the rules under Section 69.
Many of these writ petitions had been disposed of by learned single Judges of the High Court and special appeals against these judgments were pending before the Division Bench while other writ petitions were pending for disposal before learned single Judges.
The learned Judges have also taken numbere of the interim orders that were passed by other learned Judges sitting singly in various writ petitions, both at Allahabad as well as at Lucknow, and have observed that the said interim orders were obtained by the petitioners on the basis of averments which were incorrect and false.
3721/90, Majeed Ors.
v. State of U.P. Ors.
All the special appeals and writ petitions that were pending in the High Court at Allahabad as well at the Lucknow Bench were taken up and were disposed of by the Division Bench of the High Court by the impugned judgment dated February 8, 1995.
Writ Petition No.
Referring to the decision of S.H.A. Raza J. in Civil Misc.
The learned Judges have, therefore, dismissed the writ petitions that were filed by the petitioners.
/93 CC number 121212/91 filed against the said judgment was dismissed on the ground of delay by this Court by order dated August 10, 1993.
to in paragraphs 95 and 96 of the Manual, i.e., posts on the permanent and the temporary strength of the establishment.
On March 24, 1991 the Inspector General of Registration issued a press Notification inviting applications for appointment to the posts of Registration Clerks.
On behalf of the petitioners, it was claimed before the High Court that they had been regularly selected by a duly companystituted Selection Committee and their appointment should be treated as regular appointment.
The learned Judges have also referred to the judgmentment of another learned single Judge Vijay Bahuguna J. in Civil Misc.
Writ Petition No.
The other companytention that was urged on behalf of the petitioners before the High Court was that the petitioners had been working on daily wage basis for a number of years and, therefore, they were entitled to be regularised on the post.
To Inspector General of Registration Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad Sub Appointment of daily wage clerks for purpose of disposal of arrears of documents in Registration Offices Sir, With reference to your D.O. letter No.
This claim was, however, companytested by the State.
The High Court rejected the said claim of the petitioners and held that numberhing had been shown that the appointment of the petitioners was made after selection through a Selection Committee.
In a large number of cases interim orders had been passed directing that the petitioners in the writ petitions may be allowed to companytinue in service during the pendency of the writ petitions.
22726 29/95 C.No.3559/95.
C. AGRAWAL , J. Delay companydoned in S.L.P. C No.
A number of writ petitions were filed in the Allahabad High Court by persons who had worked as registration clerks on daily wage basis in the past or who were actually working as Registration Clerks on daily wage basis wherein the petitioners sought regularisation of their appointment on the post of registration clerk and prayed for quashing of the Press numberification inviting applications for appointment on the post of registration clerks.
The said companytention was also rejected by the High Court on the view that numbere of the petitioners were either ad hoc employees or even daily wagers companytinuously for one year or for 240 days as is generally claimed by the persons seeking regularisation even in industrial establishments and, furthermore the petitioners did number fall in any of the categories referred to by this Court in the State of Haryana Piara Singh, 1992 1 SCC 118, as entitling regularisation.
These petitions for special leave to appeal arise out of judgment dated February 8, 1995 passed by the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court in various special appeals and writ petitions involving companymon questions relating to regularisation of Registration Clerks employed on daily wage basis in the Registration Department of the Government of Uttar Pradesh.
Under the U.P. Registration Manual hereinafter referred to as the Manual provision is made in paragraph 94 A for appointment to the post of Registration Clerks in Sub registrars offices and in District Registrars offices by the District Registrar.
As regards the advertisement dated March 24, 1991 issued by the State inviting applications for appointment on the post of Registration Clerks it was stated on behalf of the respondents before the High Court that in view of the amendments which have been made in the Registration Act, 1908, the State does number need any more Registration Clerks and that numberfurther steps have been taken for recruitment on the basis of the said advertisement.
By numberification dated September 9, 1992 published in the U.P. Gazette dated April 10, 1993 the 1978 Rules were amended by the Amendment Rules of 1982 and direct recruitment for the post of Registration Clerk is to be made through the U.P.Subordinate Services Selection Commission on the basis of companypetitive examination companyducted by the Commission.
Writ Petition No.
The petitioners in these cases are persons who were appointed on daily wage basis for short period periods in an year and on the expiry of the period their services were terminated.
