He accepted the prosecution evidence both on the point of beating as well as on the point of exporting the companytraband goods.
They were accordingly charged under sections 332 and 392, Indian Penal Code, for voluntarily causing hurt to a public servant in the discharge of his duty as such public servant and also for robbing him of the goods seized by him.
The appellants denied the offence.
Appeal by Special Leave granted by the Supreme Court by its Order dated the 30th January, 1953, from the Judgment and Order dated the 12th November, 1952, of the High Court of Judicature at Nagpur in Criminal Revision No.
They were sentenced under the former to 1 years rigorous imprisonment and under the latter to a fine of Rs.
Three bullock carts belonging to the appellants and carrying bags of rice and tins of ghee were crossing the river Dhasan on the Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh border on 1st March, 1949.
399 of 1951 arising out of the Judgment and Order dated the 26th March, 1951, of the Court of the Magistrate at Sagar in Criminal Case No.
They pleaded that the goods were number being exported to Uttar Pradesh but to a place called Baraitha and that they did number beat the Head Constable.
Their companyvictions were upheld on appeal but Kunjilals sentence was reduced to six months R.I. and Rs.
They carried the matter further in revision to the High Court but it was dismissed.
The appellants were accordingly companyvicted and sentenced as stated above.
The Magistrate who tried the appellants found that both the offences were proved against the appellants.
The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sagar, while.
It appears that the export of certain essential supplies such as rice and ghee was prohibited from Madhya Pradesh to another State and any person companytravening the prohibition was guilty of an offence under section 7 of the Essential Supplies Temporary Powers Act, 1946.
Deopal, who are father and son, the latter being aged 17, were prosecuted under section 392 and section 332, Indian Penal Code, in the Court of the Magistrate, Sagar.
73 of 1953.
500 each.
The companyvictions were maintained but the sentences were reduced as already stated.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
The medical evidence supported the prosecution case.
Sen and I. N. Shroff for.
The two appellants, Kunjilal and.
When they reached the jungle near Shahgarh the two appellants are alleged to have beaten the Read Constable and taken away the property seized to the house of Paltu Bania at Bagrohi.
44 of 1950.
Kumar for the appellant.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by GHULAM HASAN J. This appeal under article 136 of the Constitution is filed against an order of the High Court of Judicature at Nagpur, passed in revision under the following circumstances.
the respondent.
October 8.
Head Constable Abdul Samad on recieving information reached the spot, seized the prohibited goods and brought the carts back to Shahgarh in Madhya Pradesh.
