Narayani Debi Khaitan v. The State of Bihar 1 , observed.
On October 9, 1959, import licence of the value of Rs.
Gajendragadkar, C.J., speaking for the Constitution Bench, n Smt.
Appeal from the order dated August 26, 1964 of the Punjab High Court in Civil Writ No.
226 of the Constitution was filed after great delay.
The appellant filed a second appeal to the Chief Controller of Imports and Exports, and this was dismissed on April 22, 1961.
Thereupon the appellant applied for a certificate under Art.
It is alleged by the appellant that he was number given a hearing.
This exhausted all the remedies he had under para 85 of the order relating to the Export Promotion Scheme, but he instead of filing a writ chose to wait.
30,000/ was issued to the appellant.
The High Court of Punjab, Circuit Bench, Delhi, dismissed the petition in limine.
The Export Promotion Scheme was discontinued with effect from March 6, 1959.
Apparently the Chief Controller invited him and on June 22, 1964, he was informed that numberfurther licence would be issued to him.
8,10,325/ , F.O.B. value Rs.
CChagla, Sardar Bahaclur, Ajit Prasad Jain, Vishnu Saharya ,and Yougindra Kaushalani, for the appellant.
On August 24, 1964, the appellant filed the petition above mentioned in the High Court.
498 D of 1964.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
His appeal against this order was rejected by the Joint Chief Controller on March 4, 1960.
133 1 a of the Constitution.
The relevant facts are as under.
The appellant was carrying on business of export and import, and exported goods of the value of Rs.
On November 12, 1958, the appellant applied for an import licence for art silk yarn of the f.o.b.
1116 of 1965.
The appellant apparently approached the Minister of International Trade by letter dated April 6, 1964 this is the letter referred to in the letter of the Private Secretary to the Minister of International Trade and the Private Secretary, vide his letter dated April 16, 1964, wrote to him saying that his letter had been passed on to the Chief Controller of Imports and Exports, New Delhi, and if so desired the appellant may see him in the matter.
value of Rs.
3,27,841/ only was issued to the appellant by the Joint Chief Controller of Imports and Exports, Bombay.
8,03,530.45 nP under the Export Promotion Scheme.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Sikri, J. The appellant, Durga Prashad, filed a petition under Art.
A. Seyid Muhammad and S.P. Nayar, for the respondents.
8,03,530.45, during the period August 25, 1958, to September 29, 1958.
226 of the Constitution against the respondents.
