The relevant portion of the order reads as follows In companypliance with the aforesaid order dated 12.12.2001 passed by the Honble High Court of Punjab and Haryana, the joint legal numberice dated 3.4.2001 Annexure P 4 submitted by the petitioners, has been examined by the undersigned and it has been found that the petitioner is number entitled to claim the relief of regularization of his services as he was appointed as SPOs Bank Guards on daily wages basis Rs.30/ per day by the SSP Amritsar vide No.14477 80/B dated 27.4.87 P.O. Bank Guard , on the request of the Bank Authorities which were increased later on from time to time as per Govt.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition following an earlier judgment of a Division Bench in LPA 209 of 1992 dated 6th September, 1993, which in turn arose out of Civil Writ Petition No.
The petitioners are still working as guards with the Gramin Banks and daily wages is being given by the Bank Authorities.
Legal numberice Annexure P 4 is devoid of any legal force and is being rejected.
The said writ petition was dismissed by order dated 12.12.2001 directing companysideration of the cases of the petitioners therein appellants herein in accordance with the law and pass a speaking order.
The numberification No.11/34/2000 4PP III/1301 dated 23.1.2001 is number applicable in the case bank guard as their daily wages are being paid by the bank.
13915 of 2002 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dated 23rd January, 2003.
Pursuant to the said directions, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar hereinafter referred to as the SSP purported to companysider the cases of the appellants herein and passed an order dated 23.4.2002 rejecting the claim of the appellants.
As such, the claim of the petitioner Bank Guards SPO Ajit Singh No.247/ASR is number maintainable against the State of Punjab or this Office.
The petitioner be informed personally.
Hence the present appeal.
20 unsuccessful petitioners in the above writ petition are the appellants herein.
Challenging the said order, the appellants herein once again approached the High Court of Punjab Haryana in Civil Writ Petition No.13915 of 2002 which came to be dismissed by the judgment under appeal.
Relevant in the companytext of the SPOs to be appointed, was the further decision The appellants herein assert that all the appellants are ex servicemen and registered with the employment exchange.
No seniority of the S.P.O. Bank Guard has been maintained in Amritsar District.
We are required to examine the companyrectness of the decision dated 23.4.2002 of the SSP as approved by the judgment under appeal.
State was number in a position to handle the prevailing law and order situation with the available police personnel.
They were appointed as SPO Bank Guards in order to provide them power, privileges and protection of ordinary police official as provided under section 18 of the Police Act 1861 due to terrorism in the State at that time.
5280 of 1988.
Keeping in view the above legal numberice dated 3.4.2001 annexure P.4 has been companysidered.
The factual background in which persons such as the appellants herein came to be appointed is recorded in the judgment in LPA No.
instructions.
Relying on the said companyclusion, the writ petition of the appellants herein also came to be dismissed.
SPO Bank Guard is still working with the Gramin banks in Amritsar district and he can lay his claim, if any, to the bank authorities instead of the Police Department.
