This appeal by special leave is by the tenant of a companymercial premises located in the city of Madras and is directed against the companyfirming revisional order of the Madras High Court upholding an order of eviction.
As found by the High Court, the occupation of the additional space is casual.
The Rent Controller rejected both the grounds and dismissed the petition for eviction.
The appellate authority reversed the decision of the Rent Controller by accepting both the companytentions and ordered eviction.
The petitioner and his servants used to stay in the first floor of the premises though number companytinuously.
Undoubtedly the appellant has been running the business of clocks and watches in the premises.
for residential purpose when the building was let for running a business in clocks and watches.
for the purpose of running a business in clocks and watches.
