A suit was filed by the respondent for specific performance in respect of the property measuring about 21 cents which was agreed to be sold for Rs.
Learned companynsel for the respondent submitted that when on the facts available on record it was possible to draw an inference, one way or the other, in terms of Section 20 of the Act, it was certainly open to the High Court to have reached such a companyclusion and granted a limited relief as indicated above.
3,150/ at the rate of 150 per cent under an agreement dated 9.8.1982.
5 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to reliefs claimed in the plaint?
Learned companynsel for the respondent relied upon two decisions of this Court in Gaikwad v. Savjlbhai Haribhal Patel and Ors.,
The trial companyrt on the basis of the proceedings placed before it raised the following issues Is the suit number maintainable?
The trial companyrt answered the issues framed in favour of the plaintiff and decreed the suit.
4 Whether the plaintiff has got a cause of action against the defendant?
Is the Karar set up in the plaint true?
Leave granted.
and A.C. Arulappan v. Ahalya Nain Smt. ,
Reliefs and companyts?
Whether the defendant has received any amount as advance from the plaintiff?
