She was appointed as a Peon on 19.6.1984 and the appointment was approved.
But this was overruled by the District Education Officer and ultimately the Director of Public Instruction accepted the companytention of the respondent herein.
The matter was taken up in appeal before the Director of Public Instructions and the Director of Public Instructions allowed the appeal of the respondent and set aside the appointment of appellant herein.
P1 dated 1.8.2000.
The District Education Officer rejected her claim.
Thereafter the respondent herein approached the Kerala High Court by filing a writ petition and direction was given by the Court in O. P.No.19512 of 2000 to the District Education Officer to companysider the candidature of the respondent.
Aggrieved against the order passed by learned Single Judge, the respondent herein filed a writ appeal before the Division Bench.
On account of retirement, a vacancy in High School Assistant Hindi arose in the School on 1.4.2000.
She possessed all necessary qualification for being companysidered for appointment as High School Assistant Hindi .
Aggrieved against aforesaid order present appeal was filed.
Aggrieved against the order of the Director of Public Instructions, the appellants herein filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala.
This appointment of the appellant herein was approved by the District Education Officer by order dated 23.9.2000.
Appointment was given to one P.Rajeev the appellant herein vide Ext.
Brief facts which are necessary for disposal of this appeal are that the respondent No.1 V.Ananthakumari hereinafter referred to as respondent was working as a Peon in Viswabharathi Model High School.
K. MATHUR, J. This appeal is directed against the order passed by the Division Bench of Kerala High Court in W.A.No.413 of 2001 dated 11.1.2001 whereby the appeal filed by the respondent No.1 herein was allowed by the Division Bench and the judgment of learned Single Judge of the High Court was set aside.
