Thereafter, the respondent filed O.A. in the Tribunal which, in the impugned order, has allowed the petition relying upon the judgment of the CAT, Bombay Bench in O.A. against which SLP No.
Consequent on the switching over from the Provident Fund Scheme to the Pension Scheme, options had been given to the employees.
This appeal by special leave arises from the order of Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench passed in A. No.
In fact option for six times was given to the respondent, but he did number avail of the same.
However, an application had been made on December 19, 1993 requesting the appellants to permit him to opt to the Pension Scheme which was rejected by the Government by order dated January 19, 1994.
The respondent was a railway employee.
Delay companydoned.
Leave granted.
He retired from service, on attaining superannuation, on April 21, 1972 as Chief Inspector of Communications.
5973/88 was filed and the same was dismissed by this Court in limine.
686/95 on September 29, 1995.
