In the case of Ext.66 sale deed also, according to the plaintiff, the same pattern was followed as defendant advanced a sum of Rs.13,000/ Rupees thirteen thousand only to the plaintiff for buying the land and so it was incumbent on the defendant to reconvey the property.
It was claimed to be the property of the plaintiff even though the defendant was shown in the document as the vendee.
Suit was filed in 1981 for declaration of plaintiffs title to the suit property and also for an injunction for restraining the defendant from disturbing the possession of the plaintiff.
Ext.163 is a letter sent by the plaintiff to the defendant on 8.6.1968.
Trial companyrt while dismissing the suit held that plaintiff failed to prove his title that he was the real owner of the property and that plaintiff failed to establish that he was in possession of it on the date of suit.
The suit relates to a property companyered by Ext.66 sale deed dated December 16, 1963.
THOMAS, J. Legal heirs of a plaintiff Vrajlal J. Ganatra who suffered defeat both at the original side as well as at the appellate stage High Court of Gujarat have filed this appeal by special leave.
