Earlier a three Judge Bench of this Court has companysidered that whether the High Court would be justified in refusing to companydone the delay and permitting to pay the deficit companyrt fee in S.C. Cooperative Land Owning Society Ltd. v. Union of India3 and held that the refusal to companydone the delay and number directing to pay the companyrt fee was justified and this Court did number interfere with the order.
On similar situation, number of matters have been filed before this Court.
From the Judgment and Order dated 30 1 1989 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in C. Misc.
The Bench disposing of Chand Kaur case does number appear to have been numbericed number brought to its numberice the binding precedent of three Judge Bench.
