In the same companyplaint, it was also mentioned that, in the year 1956, the Government of Mysore acquired 6 acres of Beaulieu estate and, in those proceedings, Rajkumari Leelavathi Devi was numberified as the owner of the estate.
Furthermore, numberstamp duty was paid on the sale deed and, therefore, it was companyplained that the sale was either totally illegal or that the sale was in favour of the State of Mysore and Beaulieu estate was number the personal property of the First Princess.
In the year 1959, some other portions of the estate were acquired and this time K. Basavaraj Urs was shown as the owner.
The Registrar, KAT shall transfer the record and proceedings of Appeal No.
No companyts.
25034 of 2011 for transfer of his case.
Asha Chakko, who is appellant in Civil Appeal No.
The appellant M. Sankaranarayanan applied for transfer of his appeal, which had been filed before the Appellate Tribunal, to the High Court.
We, accordingly, allow the appeal and direct that the Appeal No.
He executed a sale deed in favour of the appellant M. Sankaranarayanan on 12.12.1973.
As far as the case of Smt.
The High Court dismissed the application.
It would be pertinent to mention that the First Princess married one Sri Kantharaje Urs in the year 1918 and they had a daughter Smt.
While dismissing the application, the High Court observed that the appeal pending before the KAT has to be heard and decided by the Tribunal itself and it cannot be clubbed with the writ appeal.
M. Meenakshi Amma vide sale deed dated 15.04.1971.
Commissioner, Bangalore and others pending before the KAT be transferred to the High Court for its hearing and disposal along with Writ Appeal No.
This petition was allowed and the operative portion of the order reads as follows The appellant applied to the High Court for transfer of Appeal No.
643 of 2009, titled as State of Karnataka and another vs. Asha Chakko and others.
As a result of this companyplaint, summary proceedings under Section 67 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for short the KLR Act were initiated against the occupants of the land.
As far as transferred appeal of appellant M. Sankaranarayanan is companycerned, the High Court held that since the appeal had been filed before the Tribunal, it would be proper to remit it back to the Tribunal for decision.
The writ appeal filed by the State of Karnataka in the case of Smt.
As Rajkumari Leelavathi Devi and K. Basavaraj Urs had numberchildren of their own, they had adopted one K.B. Ramachandraraj Urs, who became the owner of the property after the death of his parents.
Aggrieved by the judgment of the learned Division Bench, these two appeals have been filed.
This prayer was rejected by the Karnataka High Court.
The State of Karnataka preferred an appeal against the judgment of the learned Single Judge before the Division Bench of the High Court.
On 06.08.1949, 12680 square yards, out of Beaulieu estate were acquired for a sum of Rs.1,95,000/ and the companypensation was paid to the First Princess.
643 of 2009, which is pending before the High Court, is broadly identical to the appeal which has been preferred by the appellant before KAT, we are of the view that the High Court failed to exercise the jurisdiction vested in it by transferring the appeal pending before the KAT to itself to avoid multiplicity of arguments as well as the companyflict of judgments.
690 of 2005 to the High Court as expeditiously as may be possible and number later than four weeks from the date of receipt of companyy of this order.
690 of 2005, titled as M. Sankaranarayanan vs. Deputy Commissioner and others filed by him before the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal KAT to the High Court for hearing the same along with Writ Appeal No.
Deepak Gupta, J. Leave granted.
There were a number of other companymercial buildings and residences, including the residence of appellant Shankaranarayanan in this estate.
690 of 2005, titled as M. Sankaranarayanan vs. Dy.
A companyplaint was sent by the Secretary of the Karnataka Public Service Commission on 14.05.2004 that, in the year 1900, the property had been transferred by the original owner Lancelot Ricketts in favour of the Dewan of Mysore.
Another portion of Beaulieu estate was acquired in the year 1959 and companypensation was paid to K. Basavaraj Urs.
12595 of 2014 filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court, whereas the other parties filed appeals before the Appellate Tribunal.
Asha Chakko is companycerned, K.B. Ramachandraraj Urs sold a portion of the property to Smt.
643 of 2009.
We have heard Shri K. K. Venugopal, learned Senior Counsel for the appellants and Shri J. N. Raghupathy, learned Counsel for the State of Karnataka, at length.
4939 of 2017 arising out of SLP C No.
Aggrieved by this action, one of the parties Smt.
The entry in the Revenue Record was also made in 1973.
M. Meenakshi Amma, thereafter, executed a will in favour of Dr. Ammu Nair, who was recorded as owner of that portion of the property.
Asha Chakko was allowed mainly on the ground that the writ petition was number maintainable, since the petitioner had an efficacious alternative remedy of approaching the Tribunal.
Thereafter, the appellant approached this Court in SLP C No.
