It was number disputed before us that the respondent had number produced any material in support of its case that under the relevant provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, Sri Amar Roy was eligible to represent it, except furnishing the registration number of the Association of which Sri Amar Roy was said to be the President.
The objection raised by the appellant against representation of the respondent by Amar Roy was that being a legal practitioner he was number eligible to represent the respondent in view of the provisions in Section 36 2 , 3 and 4 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
The companypany carried the matter in writ appeal before the Division Bench which, as numbered earlier, allowed the appeal, set aside the judgment of the learned single Judge and permitted Sri Amar Roy to represent the respondent.
It follows therefore that the finding recorded by the Tribunal was without making any attempt to get the relevant documents which were stated in the objection petition and without companysidering the effect of number production of the same in the case.The association is known as Assam, West Bengal, Orissa and Bihar Employers Association which is stated to be registered under the West Bengal Societies Registration Act.
13 of 2000 allowing the appeal filed by the employer, respondent No.
Further, it was alleged by the appellant that Amar Roy was number the President of the Association of which the respondent was a member and he was ineligible to represent the respondent on that ground also.
In this appeal, the workman has challenged the judgment of a Division Bench of Calcutta High Court in APO No.
On behalf of the workman, a petition was filed before the Tribunal to call upon the respondent to produce certain documents which were for adjudication of the matter as claimed by the appellant.
The respondent neither filed any objection to the said petition number produced the documents stated therein.
The companytroversy raised in the case relates to the eligibility of one Amar Roy to represent the respondent before the Industrial Tribunal as the President of Employers Association of which the respondent is a member.
Leave granted.
1 herein hereinafter referred to as the respondent .
Hence, this appeal by the workman.
