b. r.o.m.
the m.p.s.m.c.
1991 1.1st a 1st a p2 05 30 sio2 p2 05 29 3 1 1518 sio2 15 1 8 f0203 below 4.5 fo203 below 24 a. 1/2 2.1/2 size a 1/22.
from the judgment and order dated 16.7.92.of the delhi high court in civil writ petition number 1780 of 1992 and civil misc.
was selling hirapur phosphorite in different percentages p2 05 grades and number in mix companydition.
1450 51 of 1993.
1/2 size r.o.m.
tulsi addl.
by product dust ii grade p205 22 25 sio2 and fo2o3 numbergrantee.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number.
singh yunus malik and gopal singh for the respondents.
r.o.m.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by m. sahai j. was there any valid justification for the appellants the union of india to withhold the payment of subsidy to the respondents the small scale manufacturers of fertiliser is the main question that arises for consideration in this appeal directed against the judgment and order of the delhi high companyrt?
out grades and other specifications indicated as below before 5.3 1991 from 6.3.
further numberrock phosphate has been or companyld be purchased by any manufacturer except through companyporation of the state.
number 3485 of 1992.
1st b 1st b p205 28 30 pro5 27 29 sio2 18 sio222 fo203 f 203 above 4.5 above 4.5 a 1/2 size a 1/2 size r.0 m. b r.o.m.
relying on these reports the subsidy payable to the manufacturers was withheld and they were required by a letter dated 20th april 1990 to explain as to how they were able to achieve the standard specification.
