According to the appellants all these were signed by Miss Suraj Mani Khalko and were fabricated and forged documents and were never issued by the department which is manifest from the dispatch register.
On the basis of the direction given by the High Court in CWJC No.3878/1995, Deputy Commissioner was appointed to make an inquiry.
A few days thereafter i.e. on 15.10.1993 illegal appointments made by Miss Suraj Mani Khalko were cancelled by the Government.
Direction was also given to make payment of admitted dues since 21.9.1993 till date.
On 16.9.1993 the appointment letter was purportedly issued and the respondent claimed to have joined on 21.9.1993, but he was number paid his salary.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition by its order dated 28.8.1995 with the direction to the respondent to file fresh representation with all materials i.e. letter of appointment etc.
According to the respondent advertisement was issued for Class III and Class IV employees on 4.6.1993 and on 12.7.1993 interview letters were issued.
The respondent filed a writ petition in the year 1995 before the Jharkhand High Court.
The Letters Patent Appeal filed as aforesaid was dismissed.
The respondent did number file any representation as was directed by the High Court.
Learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent on the ground that Sanjay Kumar had been appointed pursuant to the order passed by the High Court.
Respondent filed CWJC No.829/1998.
Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a Division Bench of the Jharkhand High Court dismissing the Letters Patent Appeal filed by the appellant State and its functionaries.
4310 OF 2007 Arising out of S.L.P. C No.
CIVIL APPEAL NO.
Several terminated employees filed writ petitions which were dismissed by the High Court on the ground that the appointments were violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, 1950 in short the Constitution as they had been made without following the requisite procedure.
18890 of 2005 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows One Miss Suraj Mani Khalko, a few days before her retirement made many appointments to the posts of Class III and Class IV employees without following the procedure of appointment stipulated by instruction dated 3.12.1980.
By order dated 22.4.1997 the services of respondent, Sri Sanjay Kumar and three others were terminated by the District Education Officer.
No records were available in the office for such appointments, namely, advertisement, requisition to employment exchange, companymittee for preparing panel to be chaired by District Magistrate, with District Welfare Officer and three officers of different district levels.
By report dated 10.4.1997, the Deputy Commissioner found all the appointments to be illegal.
before the authority.
