The tenant had denied the relationship of landlord and tenant and even claimed title to the said property on the basis of an agreement dated 21st November, 1953 entered into between the predecessor in interest of the petitioner.
As already numbericed, the judgment of the Appellate Authority was set aside by the High Court vide its judgment dated 21st May, 2003 and it is this judgment of the High Court which has been assailed by way of a Special Leave Petition before this Court.
The leave to appeal was granted by the Court vide order dated 13th February, 2006.
The ground taken for ejectment of the tenant in the eviction petition was number payment of rent which was only Rs.
The petition had been instituted by the landlord against the tenant on the ground of number payment of rent.
During the pendency of the appeal on 28th November, 2007, the sole petitioner died.
When they companytacted the companynsel at New Delhi these LRs.
1 of 2010 has been filed along with I.A. No.
It was further pointed out to the companynsel that the LRs.
the companynsel was told about the death of Sh.
Balwant Singh which had taken place in November, 2007.
were number aware about the pendency of the appeal in this Court or about the requirement of law to bring the LRs.
200/ per month.
It is number they have companye to know that the LRs.
on record after the death of Balwant Singh.
2 of 2010 praying for companydonation of delay in filing the application for bringing the legal heirs on record.
