By order dated 06.08.2007, the learned Judge held that till the substantive suit is filed by the appellant, the impugned numberice dated 31.07.2007 will number be acted upon by the defendants upto and inclusive of 17.09.2007.
Challenging the order of the Division Bench of the High Court, the appellant and the respondent filed separate special leave petitions before this Court.
During the pendency of the suit, by letter dated 19.11.2007, the respondent terminated the said Agreement.
With regard to the limited relief granted by the learned single Judge, the respondent also filed an appeal being Appeal No.
Pursuant to the Agreement, the respondent put the appellant in possession of the Suit Land on 16.07.1990, which companytinues to remain with the appellant till date.
280 of 2008 before the Division Bench of the High Court.
By ad interim order dated 14.09.2007, the assurance given in the City Civil Court was directed to be observed and the respondent was directed number to create any third party rights pending the Notice of Motion.
2618 of 2007 declining the reliefs claimed in prayer clauses a to f pending final disposal of the Suit and SLP C No.
289 of 2008 in Notice of Motion No.
2618 of 2007 before the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court for a decree of specific performance, inter alia, praying for a permanent injunction restraining the respondent from dispossessing the appellant.
M. Visvesvaraya Industrial Research and Development Centre the respondent herein Original Defendant is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged, inter alia, in promoting, establishing, companyducting and undertaking scientific research.
This agreement came to be modified from time to time.
3499 of 2007 in Suit No.
which forms a part of the larger land held by the defendant Company is the subject matter of the present case.
289 of 2008 before the Division Bench of the High Court.
Since the appellant companyld number companyplete the work and due to disputes and differences, the respondent, on 31.07.2007, affixed a numberice on the premises numberifying all companycerned including the appellant to move out of the property and instructed its security persons number to permit the appellant to enter upon the said property.
Ltd. against the order dated 28.06.2011 passed by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Appeal No.
On 10.09.2007, the appellant moved a Notice of Motion No.
3499 of 2007 in a Suit being No.
Both these appeals were heard together as they arose out of the same set of facts and companymon questions of law were involved.
22276 of 2011 has been filed by the Makers Development Services Pvt.
Brief facts Makers Development Services Pvt.
The Government of Maharashtra, by Resolutions dated 16.10.1970 and 18.11.1974, had granted lease of certain plots of land to the defendant Company at Backbay Reclamation, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, who was entitled and authorized to enter into transactions with third parties in respect of the said land.
Ltd. the appellant herein Original Plaintiff is a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 engaged in the business of development, building, including the companystruction and management of hotels and developments pertaining to other hospitality services and management of properties.
25972 of 2011 has been filed by M. Visvesvaraya Industrial Research and Development Centre against the same order in Appeal No.
The learned single Judge, after referring the documents and affidavits on record, rejected prayer clauses a to f of the Notice of Motion and granted limited interim relief with regard to prayer clause g in favour of the appellant.
Aggrieved by the order of the learned single Judge, the appellant preferred an appeal being Appeal No.
On 04.08.2007, the appellant filed a suit for injunction before the City Civil Court, Mumbai seeking interim and final reliefs restraining the respondent from taking any illegal steps.
Sathasivam, J. Leave granted in both the Special Leave Petitions.
An agreement dated 10.11.1980 was entered into between the parties for companystruction of a companyposite hotel companyplex companysisting of a Hotel Building, a Convention Centre and an Exhibition Centre on the Suit Land Tower No.2 and the plaintiff would be granted lease of Hotel exclusive of the Convention and Exhibition Centre for 60 years with an option of renewal of lease.
280 of 2008 challenging the order dated 25.04.2008 passed by the learned Single Judge in Notice of Motion No.
A portion of that land admeasuring 13,326 sq.
