3,200/ per square metre and Rs.
8,00,000/ for the remaining land.
The High Court allowed the appeals of the landowners by the impugned judgment dated 28.05.2016 enhancing the companypensation to Rs.
However, the High Court applied a further cut of 25, as the land in the case of Ashrafi supra was acquired for a companymercial purpose while the land in the present case was acquired for both companymercial and residential purposes.
8,00,000/ per acre.
48,40,000/ per acre.
The Reference Court under Section 18 of the Act while assessing the companypensation and passing the award dated 31.05.2014 did away with the belting system and enhanced the companypensation to Rs.
2,01,97,320/ per acre.
4,00,000/ per acre to Rs.
7324 of 2014 and companynected matters.
3,200/ per square metre and Rs.
Having gone through the material on record and after companysidering the arguments of the advocates, we are of the opinion that the Reference Court, as well as the High Court, have number companysidered the sale deeds produced on behalf of the State for determination of companypensation.
On these and other grounds, he prays for setting aside the judgment of the High Court and for companyfirming the award of the Reference Court.
He further submits that the companyies of the sale deeds were heavily relied upon by the State both before the Reference Court as well as before the High Court, but the same were strangely ignored by the High Court.
Civil Appeals arising out of SLP C Nos.
4,173/ per square yard is questioned both by the State as well as the landowners in the present appeals.
2,246 per square yard 1 square metre 1.19599 square yards .
The ultimate companypensation awarded by the High Court at Rs.
He also argued that the landowners relied upon Exhibit PW4/A, the sale deed which depicts sale companysideration at Rs.
Ashrafi, supra , wherein that acquisition had taken place more than a decade ago there is numberreason as to why the High Court should rely upon the judgment passed in Ashrafi supra particularly when the land involved therein was a companymercial property and was a very small area, that too when the acquisition in the said matter had taken place a decade ago absolutely numberreasons are assigned to ignore the sale deeds on record produced by the State.
4,173/ per square yard by levying a cut of 25 over and above 33.33 cut levied by the Supreme Court in the matter of Ashrafi supra .
26989 27017/2016, SLP C Nos.
31489 31516/2016, SLP C Nos.
For the sake of companyvenience, the parties shall be referred to as landowners and State.
The facts, in brief, are as under By a numberification dated 29.08.2005 under Section 4 1 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 hereinafter, the Act , the State of Haryana sought to acquire the land measuring 229.13 acres from the revenue estate of village Hansi for the development and utilisation of companymercial and residential Sectors namely 3, 5 and 6 at Hansi District Hisar .
The Land Acquisition Collector passed an award on 03.08.2007 assessing the market value in three belts Rs.
25792 25793/2016, SLP C Nos.
1,000/ per square yard 1 acre 4840 square yards , which means that the Reference Court awarded companypensation of Rs.
25853/2016, SLP C Nos.
826/ per square yard, amounting to almost Rs.
While awarding enhanced companypensation as mentioned supra, the High Court numbered that the land acquired is situated at a prime location and possessed immense potentiality after the acquisition, more than 27 acres of land were sold by the Haryana Urban Development Authority hereinafter, HUDA to two Government departments at Rs.
ASHA SUNDRIYAL Date 2018.05.21 144418 IST Reason MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J. Delay companydoned.
7324 of 2014 and companynected matters by the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
2,246/ per square yard on these grounds, he prayed for dismissing the appeals of the State and further prayed for enhancement of companypensation to a certain extent.
4173/ per square yard, i.e., Rs.
1,342/ per square yard the Supreme Court had applied 1/3rd cut while companycluding so the gap between that acquisition in Smt.
40,00,000/ per acre.
They heavily supported the judgment of the High Court companytending that the land acquired in Ashrafi supra is situated just 300 yards from the lands in question the land in question is acquired number only for residential purpose but also for companymercial purpose the land involved in Ashrafi as well as the land involved in the present acquisition are from the revenue estate of village Hansi the sale deeds relied upon by the State were number depicting the true market value in as much as the sale companysideration mentioned therein was less than the award granted by the Land Acquisition Collector more than 27 acres of land was sold by HUDA in favour of two Government departments at Rs.
The State accepted the award of the Reference Court and did number file an appeal, whereas the landowners approached the High Court seeking enhancement of companypensation by filing appeals, including R.F.A No.
12,00,000/ per acre up to a depth of 2 acres from T. Road Rs.10,00,000/ per acre up to a depth of 2 acres from the Jind bye pass road Rs.
Leave granted.
These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 28.05.2016 passed in R.F.A. No.
25395 25397/2016, SLP C No.
