Challenging the said order, the appellant landlord filed writ petition before the High Court being C.M.W.P. No.48964 of 2015.
Signature Not Verified 4 Digitally signed by MAHABIR SINGH The respondents application for setting aside the ex Date 2019.10.04 172449 IST Reason parte order of eviction dated 05.09.2012 was allowed by the Prescribed Authority ACMM IX, Kanpur Nagar, on 20.08.2015 on payment of companyt of Rs.2500/ .
Grievance of the appellant landlord is that the respondent tenant kept on taking adjournments by filing one after another applications and thereby the matter companyld number be proceeded.
There were number of proceedings applications pending between the appellant landlord and the respondent tenant.
Vide impugned Order dated 15.09.2015, the High Court disposed of C.M.W.P. No.48964 of 2015 by holding that the rent companyrt has set aside the ex parte decree order and granted an opportunity to the respondent land on payment of companyt of Rs.2500/ .
In the said writ petition, the appellant landlord filed an application under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 of C.P.C. before the High Court to amend the prayer and to challenge the subsequent Order dated 25.08.2015.
The appellant landlord filed the petition under Section 21 i a of the U.P. Urban Building Control of Letting of Rent and Eviction Act, 1972 for release of the premises let out to the respondent tenant for personal use of the appellants son who is practicing as an advocate.
BANUMATHI, J. We have heard Mr. V.C. Shukla, learned companynsel appearing for the appellant.
On 05.09.2012 the Prescribed Authority passed an ex parte order against the respondent tenant.
