150/ per mensem for the future from the date of the decision.
1 for awarding maintenance at the rate of Rs.
2 was born as a result of the intimacy of respondent No.
2 under the guardianship of respondent No.
1 was lawfully married to the appellant.
Regarding respondent No.
100/ per mensem, for the maintenance of Selva Kumar, minor respondent No.
According to the allegation made in the application, respondent No.
At the hearing of the appeal, there has been a settlement of the subject matter of the appeal and it has been agreed that the appellant shall deposit in a scheduled bank at Madras within four months from today a sum of Rs.
1 also asserted that she had undergone marriage ceremony with the appellant.
Leela Rajan, respondent No.
On revision, the High Court held that it was the appellant who was the father of respondent No.
150/ per mensem for respondent No.
2, the High Court awarded maintenance at the rate of Rs.
2, was born as a result of that intimacy.
1 for the award of maintenance.
Respondent No.
200/ per mensem for herself and at the rate of Rs.
The allegation that respondent No.
1, under Section 488 of the CrPC claiming maintenance for herself as well as for her minor son, Selva Kumar, respondent No.
1 was a Christian.
Respondent No.
1 with the appellant was also disbelieved.
Respondent No.
1, but the marriage was number valid as the appellant was a Hindu, while respondent No.
1 was at that time working as a nurse.
It is stated that Selva Kumar, respondent No.
Prayer was made by respondent No.
The Sub divisional Magistrate dismissed the application.
1 got intimate with the appellant when the appellant was a medical student.
In the result, the High Court disallowed the claim of respondent No.
16,000 in the name of respondent No.
2, against the appellant.
He disbelieved the allegation made in the application that respondent No.
100/ per mensem from the date of the application till the date of the decision of the High Court and at the rate of Rs.
An application was filed by Smt.
The High Court further held that some kind of marriage ceremony was gone through between the appellant and respondent No.
R. Khanna, J. This appeal by special leave is against the judgment of the Madras High Court reversing the decision of the Sub Divisional Magistrate and awarding for future Rs.
150/ per mensem and for the past Rs.
