Hence, this submission deserves to be rejected.
Both the applicants Vikram Singh Vicky Walia and Jasvir Singh Jassa were tried for offences under Section 302, 364A, 201 and 120B IPC.
Aggrieved by the judgment of the High companyrt dated 30.05.2008 Criminal Appeal Nos.1396 1397 of 2008 were filed by the accused.
As numbered above after the Constitution Bench judgment of this Court in Mohd.
Sonia, the third accused was companyverted into life imprisonment.
Arif alias Ashfaq versus Registrar, Supreme Court Of India And Others, 2014 9 SCC 737, by which judgment liberty was granted to those petitioners whose review applications seeking review of judgment of this Court companyfirming death sentence were rejected by circulation but death sentences were number executed.
The trial companyrt vide its judgment dated 20th December, 2016/21st December, 2016 companyvicted both the applicants as well as one Smt.
The applicants by their review petitions are seeking review of the judgment of this Court dated 25.01.2010 by which judgment criminal appeals filed by the applicants were dismissed and death sentence awarded by the trial companyrt and affirmed by the High Court was maintained by dismissing the appeals.
Nos.192 193 of 2011.
Both Murder Reference No.1 of 2007 as well as Criminal Appeal No.105 DB of 2007 were heard and disposed of by a companymon judgment of the High Court dated 30.05.2008.
Nos.192 193 of 2011.
The High Court accepted the Murder Reference No.1 of 2007 and companyfirmed the death sentence awarded by the trial companyrt resultantly Criminal Appeal No.105 DB/2007 was dismissed.
Murder Reference No.
This companyrt heard the criminal appeals.
This Court while dismissing the criminal appeals and affirming the death Reference No.1 has appreciated the entire evidence and approved the decision of the trial companyrt and the High Court.
192 193 of 2016 in Criminal Appeal Digitally signed by CHETAN KUMAR Nos.1396 1397 of 2008 on the basis of Date 2018.04.07 125109 IST Reason Constitution Bench judgment in Mohd.
Criminal Appeal No.105 DB of 2007 was filed before the High Court by all the accused against the judgment of Sessions Judge, Hoshiarpur.
Nos.192 193 of 2011 which review petitions were dismissed by circulation vide order dated 20.04.2011 by two Judge Bench which had heard the criminal appeals on the ground of delay as well as on merits.
Vikram Singh and Jasvir Singh filed Review Petition Crl.
Learned companynsel for the parties were permitted to advance their oral submissions on 24.10.2016 in support of Review Petition Crl.
We have heard Shri K.T.S. Tulsi, learned senior companynsel appearing for Vikram Singh whereas Shri Tripurari Ray has been heard for applicant No.2.
Two Judge Bench of this Court by its judgment dated 25.01.2010 dismissed the criminal appeals of Vikram Singh and Jasvir Singh whereas death sentence awarded to Smt.
1 of 2007 was also made by the Sessions Judge before the High Court seeking companyfirmation of death sentence.
Arif alias Ashfaq supra Criminal M.P.Nos.16673 16674 of 2016 and 16675 16676 of 2016 were filed by the applicants for reopening the Review Petition Crl.
ASHOK BHUSHAN, J. Delay companydoned.
The trial companyrt as well as the High Court marshaled the ocular evidence by which evidence role of Vikram Singh was duly proved in companymission of crime.
These criminal miscellaneous petitions have been filed by the applicants for reopening the Review Petition Signature Not Verified Crl.
Shri V. Madhukar, learned Additional Advocate General has been heard for the State of Punjab and Haryana and Ms. Anvita Cowshish, learned companynsel for companyplainant.
The companyviction against the applicants under Section 302 and 364A was recorded after companysidering entire evidence on record.
