After remand, the Sub Divisional Officer, companyducted inquiry and again passed an order on 29.10.1987 and companyfirmed the earlier order.
yards and directed necessary companyrections in the record as per the observations made in the order.
In view of these directions, the Sub Divisional Officer, Haveli, Sub Division, Pune, initiated proceeding RTS Revision 14 of 1984 and by order dated 30.7.1985 cancelled the mutation Entry No.1836 which companyprises land admeasuring 7897 sq.
The said Haji Habib Tar Mohammed Janu migrated to Pakistan and while going to Pakistan, he sold his property to one Smt.
The Survey Nos.118/2 and 351, being Evacuee Properties, were allotted to the Appellant in the year 1956.
It appears that the said order was taken in appeal by the respondent and the matter was remanded to the Sub Divisional Officer.
Both these RTS Appeals were heard by the Additional Collector, Pune and by order dated 28.5.2001 the Addl.
The area of this CTS Nos.
By mutation entry No.2377 the name of respondent was again mutated in the record and by the mutation Entry No.2394 the name of Genu Kadu was mutated in the record.
In the said sale certificate the C.T.S. No 129, 130 A, 130 B and 133 of Village Lonavala were mentioned.
Thereafter, the appellant filed Letters Patent Appeal, which was also dismissed by the Division Bench holding that when the State Minister for Revenue entertained the matter, he was possessed of jurisdiction under Section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code and, therefore, the order passed by him under the said authority is within his jurisdiction, power and companypetence.
Later on, it was found that the Appellant is in possession of more area and, therefore, the said order was modified on 6.5.1982 and excess area was granted to the Appellant on payment of Rs.31,360/ , which Appellant had paid on 17.5.1982 in Government Treasury and thereby the Deputy Collector and Assistant Settlement Commissioner, Pune granted the excess land to the Appellant, and thereafter the dispute started between the parties.
Being aggrieved by the order passed in the said revision, Respondent No.2 Lalwani preferred RTS Appeal No.81 of 2000 and the Respondent No.3 Genu Kadu preferred RTS Appeal No.114 of 2000.
In the impugned order, Division Bench made it clear that since the dispute between the parties was in respect of the area, as to what has been purchased in auction sale by Gulabai Desai and what is the area allotted to the Appellant by the orders of the Deputy Collector and Deputy Custodian of Evacuee Properties, the Appellant requested the Bench number to enter into the merits on this question in this LPA since the parties may prosecute their remedies in the Civil Court for such adjudication, and therefore, that aspect was number companysidered by the High Court.
The Revenue Minister allowed the said proceeding and set aside the orders passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Maval dated 28.1.2000, order dated 28.5.2001 of Additional Collector, Pune and of Additional Commissioner dated 22.11.2001, and thus, restored the position as reflected by the Mutation Entries Nos.1836 and 2377 and 2394.
The facts in brief, as narrated in the impugned order, are that Survey Nos.118, 328 and 351 of Lonavala were originally owned by one Haji Habib Tar Mohammed Janu.
Aggrieved by the said order of the Additional Collector, Respondent No.2 preferred RTS Revision No.330 of 2001 under Section 257 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 before the Additional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune.
130A 1651.1 sq.mts.
Since the mutation Entry No.1836 was cancelled by above order, the Talathi gave effect to these orders and effected the mutation Entry No.2176 and showed the disputed properties in the name of the Collector and Deputy Custodian of Evacuee Properties.
Since the Collector numbericed on companyplaint that the orders of the Collector has been bypassed or surpassed by the Subordinate Revenue Officers, the Collector by order dated 12.7.1999 directed the SDO to take these mutations namely mutation Entry No.2377 and 2394 in revision and therefore the Sub Divisional Officer, Maval Division has taken these mutations in revision bearing RTS Revision No.12 of 1999.
Respondent No.2 challenged this order of the Additional Commissioner by filing the proceeding RTS 3402/Pra.kra.309/L 6 by way of second revision before the Revenue Minister for State and the said proceeding was decided by the Minister for State on 18.10.2002.
However, in the facts of the companyflicting claims, the Appellant made grievance to the Deputy Collector and the Deputy Custodian of Evacuee Properties in respect of the Mutation made in favour of the Respondent Gulabai and other Respondents and, therefore, by order dated 18.9.1984 the Deputy Collector and Deputy Custodian of Evacuee Properties, Pune, directed the Sub Divisional Officer, Haveli Sub Division to take up the case in revision under Section 257 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code and pass necessary orders.
Hajrabi Haji Yusuf on 4.6.1949.
However, this transaction was cancelled by the Collector and Custodian of Evacuee Property on 17.4.1949 as per Section 8 i of the Evacuee Properties Act and these lands were accordingly entered as Evacuee Property by the Tahsildar, Maval on 26.10.1949.
However, further inquiry as directed by the SDO was to be companyducted.
The said revision was decided by the Additional Commissioner, Pune by order dated 22.11.2001 and the said revision was dismissed.
129, 130 A, 130 B and 133.
It appears that the Regional Settlement Commissioner placed this property for auction through Government Auctioner and one Gulabbai Desaipurchased the said property in auction for a companysideration of Rs.16,750/ on 17.5.1956 and, accordingly, sale certificate was issued by the Regional Settlement Commissioner, Bombay on behalf of the Government.
The said Gulabai also gifted her remaining area from this Survey numbers to her grandson Anil Gajanan Desai on 15.1.1979, who in turn has sold his properties to Respondent number2 Prem Hasmatraj Lalwani in the year 1980.
Thus, all the entries in favour of the Respondents were protected and maintained by the order of the State Minister for Revenue.
Appellant challenged the order dated 19.10.2002 passed by the Minister by filing a writ petition, which was dismissed by learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court.
Collector, Pune dismissed the said appeals and companyfirmed the order of the Sub Divisional Officer, Maval.
The said revision was decided by the Sub Divisional officer at Maval on 28.1.2000 and those mutations were cancelled.
The directions were issued by the Collector to the Tahsildar to place the appellant in possession of the property as per the orders of the Deputy Collector and the Deputy Custodian of Evacuee Properties.
Hence, the present appeal by special leave.
It appears that in CTS No.129, 130 A, 130 B and 133, apart from vacant land there is a bungalow No.52 Habib Villa.
By the said order, the Order of the third Sub Divisional Officer was maintained.
It appears that these survey numbers were also given C.T.S.No.
Thereafter, Gulabai sold CTS No.133 admeasuring 33 Gunthas on 24.4.1977 to Respondent No.3 Genu Kadu.
were as under 129 55.16 sq.mts.
On the basis of the said sale certificate the mutation Entry No.1836 was effected in the village record in favour of Gulabai Desai, and thereby her name was entered in Survey Nos.118/1B and 328 of village Lonavala to the extent of 29.30 Ares and 70 Ares respectively.
130B 2934.02 sq.mts 133 3237.00 sq.mts Total 7897.21 sq.mts.
However, instead of giving effect to those orders, it appears that the Revenue Officers at Tahsil level effected two mutations, viz, Mutation No.2377 and 2394.
Therefore, the RTS Appeal No.128 of 1987 was preferred before the Collector, which was disposed off by the Additional Collector on 13.7.1993.
Dismissing Letter Patents Appeal preferred by the appellant against the order of the learned Single Judge who dismissed his writ petition and companyfirmed the orders passed by the State Minister for Revenue in the proceeding T.S.3402/ Pra.kra.309/L 6 dated 18th October, 2002.
Y. Eqbal, J. This appeal by special leave is directed against order dated 13.7.2005 passed by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court.
