The High Court by a companymon order dated 20 8 1980 passed in these writ petitions has rejected all the writ petitions.
244 of 1982 by special leave against the High Courts order only insofar as it relates to dismissal of Writ Petition No.
679 and 760 of 1974, Warlu has filed special leave petitions which are barred by 4125 days i.e. by more than 11 years.
2 and 4 which arose out of references made by the civil companyrt for deciding the claim of Laxman, Tulshiram and Bani who claimed to be tenants of the same lands through Gangotribai.
Appellant, Warlu, claimed to be a tenant by virtue of a lease granted in his favour by Subhadra and Ahilya, daughters of Mahadeorao through his second wife Parvatibai.
677, 679 and 760 of 1974 against the companymon order made by the Land Revenue Tribunal rejecting the three revisions.
On the other hand, Gangotribai, the first wife of Mahadeorao filed an application registered as Revenue Case No.
These applications were heard and decided by a companymon order made by the Addl.
The appellant, Warlu, then filed three Writ Petition Nos.
Against the companymon order of the High Court dismissing Writ Petition Nos.
The appellant, Warlu, made an application before Addl.
Tahsildar, appeals were filed to the Special Deputy Collector Land Reforms , Wardha.
7, 8 and 9 of Village Anatargaon.
Tahsildar, Hinganghat, District Wardha in State of Maharashtra for a declaration that he was a tenant of Survey Nos.
Tahsildar for a declaration that Warlu and Keshao were number tenants, the right which they claimed in Revenue Case No.
The said Warlu has filed Civil Appeal No.
Tahsildar who accepted Warlus claim of being the tenant of these lands.
Thereafter, three revisions arising out of these revenue cases were filed before the Revenue Tribunal by Warlu.
Against the companymon order, made by the Addl.
In addition to these two revenue cases, there were two other cases registered as Revenue Case Nos.
That application was registered as Revenue Case No.
677 of 1974.
1 before the Addl.
Tahsildar for inquiry and fresh decision in accordance with law.
These revisions were dismissed.
