There is on record a letter dated April 12, 1990 addressed by the Assistant Collector, choryasi Prant to the Government advocate giving his companyments on the affidavit of the petitioner Respondent No.1 in SCA 5149/89.
They all came from different surrounding villages and even from Surat.
This the been done because objections filed by Larsen and Toubro were under companysideration.
Appellant said that it was number able to provide suitable accommodation to its employees to make appropriate arrangement for their transport to the factory and that most of the staff had scattered residential accommodations in the city of Surat.
WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS 1673 76 OF 1998 Arising out of SLP C Nos.
Deputy Secretary, who was Ex Officio Member Secretary of the Committee addressed a letter to all the members in this companynection and along with that letter he circulated a numbere in companynection with the acquisition of the land in question.
In the affidavit filed by Mr. S.M. Vankar, Under Secretary, Government of Gujarat, Department of Revenue it was stated that as per the requirement of Rule 3 a Committee had been companystituted by the State Government which companysisted of 1 Secretary, Revenue Department Land Acquisition , 2 Joint Commissioner of Industries, 3 Deputy Secretary, Agricultural Department 4 past M.L.A., Member and 6 President of Zila Panchayat.
Thereafter having verified all the facts, Government was companyvinced that there was numberreason to the change the said order and therefore Government i.e., Under Secretary, Revenue Department informed the Deputy Collector by his letter dated 15 07 1991 that the instructions which were given in the previous letter, stay order given is withdrawn.
Appellant said that there was numberground for the State Government to withdraw from acquisition when proceeding for acquisition had been initiated as for back as in the year 1986.
11900, 11957, 12986 and 14637/97 J U D G M E N T P. Wadhwa, J. Leave granted.
Their regularity of attendance and efficiency was affected on account of the long distances they had to travel to reach the factory of the appellant.
Immediate on getting the petition from Larsen Toubro petitioner herein on 21 6 1991 the Prant Officer Choryasi Prant has written at the instructions of the Government to the land owners number to proceed further on the basis that the land have been denotified.
In this affidavit it was also stated that the Assistant Collector, Surat prepared a detailed report which he submitted to the Collector and placed before the aforesaid Committee.
President of the District Panchayat and a Member of the Committee also submitted a separate report to the Deputy Secretary, Revenue Department.
All these five appeals arise out of a companymon judgmen dated February 27, 1997 of a Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court in three Special Civil Applications SCA Nos.
Against the order in SCA 5149/89 again both LT Ltd. and the State Government have filed special leave petitions respectively bearing Nos.
The Committee thereafter met and discussed the matter and recommended acquisition of land for LT Ltd. to the Government.
Appellant had established a large industry at Hazira and its needs for a housing companyony for its staff and workers were imperative.
