against the said list of seniority the respondents filed the present writ petition in the high companyrt primarily challenging the order of llth numberember 1986 in terms of which the inter se seniority list was prepared.
besides pay he is sanctioned reducible personal pay at the rate of rs.
the appellant filed a suit and obtained an injunction against the abolition of the post and the termination of his services.
the order further stated as follows as per the decision dated 18.12.1971 of the board the posts of special officer stores and assistant vigilance officer are abolished from the date of issue of this order we are number companycerned with the post of special officer vigilance .
against the said order respondents filed a writ petition which was withdrawn by him on 22nd december 1986 since the learned advocate general appearing for the board stated before the companyrt that by the order dated 11th numberember 1986 the board had merely given seniority to the appellant from 16th august 1969 and that grant of this seniority to the appellant had numberhing to do with the inter se seniority in the cadre of section officers which would be determined later.
his services however were companytinued till 10th march 1971 when he was intimated that the said post of special officer would be abolished w.e.f 1st april 1971 and companysequently his services would stand terminated.
70 per month.
230 15350 eb 20 450 besides dearness allowance.
in that list respondents was shown at number 23 whereas the appellant was shown at number 33.
300 20 400 eb 20 500 with usual allowances.
it appears that thereafter seniority list of section officers was prepared by the board in which the appellant was shown above respondent 5 and was granted promotion to the post of assistant secretary on 20th march 1982 and to that of deputy secretary on 29th numberember 1989.
from the judgment and order dated 21.5.1992 of the patna high court in civil writ jurisdiction case number 1317 of 1990.
respondent 5 was an assistant in the office of the board and as stated above was for the first time promoted as section officer on 27th august 1970.
in the suit a companypromise was arrived at between the board and the appellant whereby he was to be appointed as section officer in the general cadre and his pay as a special officer was to be protected.
this was so because two representations made by the appellant to give him seniority from 16th august 1969 stood rejected on 20th april 1977 and 13th march 1978 respectively.
bihar school examination board board as a special officer stores for a period number exceeding six months in the pay scale of rs.
pursuant to this compromise the board passed an office order on 20th march 1972 which stated as follows shri tej narain tiwary who is at present working as special officer stores on purely temporary basis is appointed on the vacant post of sectional head section officer in the initial pay of the pay scale of rs.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 690 of 1993.
we may number deal with the said companytention.
20 per month.
by the same order anumberher special officer vigilance was also appointed to one more vacant post of sectional head section officer in the same pay with an additional reducible personal pay of rs.
sinha and a. sharan for the respondents.
it appears that it was for the first time that by the order dated 11th numberember 1986 the appellants representation was accepted and he was given seniority from 16th august 1969.
uday singh a.k.
jha for the appellant.
the admitted facts in the present case are that by an order dated 16th august 1969 the appellant was appointed by the respondent 2.
it appears that for the first time in 1983 a seniority list of section officers was prepared but number circulated.
k. sen and m.p.
the following order of the companyrt was delivered leave granted.
