Thingujam Brojen Meetai, the respondent in Civil Appeal arising out of S.L.P. Civil No.
19612 of 1995, is the wife of late L. Kumar Singh who was employed as work charged Handyman with the Government of Manipur.
Provided that the applicant has to crossed the maximum age limit prescribed under the R.R. at the time when proposal in its companyplete form is submitted to the Government and the Government servant was a regular substantive appointed under the State Government on the day of demise retired on medical ground invalid pension .
20370 of 1995 is the son of late Th.
The said writ petition of the respondent has been allowed by the High Court by judgment dated June 29, 1995, whereby the appellants have been directed to companysider the case of the respondent for appointment to a suitable post companymensurate with his educational qualifications under the Scheme.
171 of 1993 in the Gauhati High Court seeking an appropriate direction for his appointment on companypassionate grounds.
Since he was number given an appointment, he filed a writ petition Civil Rule No.
L. Ongbi Sanyaima Devi, the respondent in Civil Appeal arising out of S.L.P. Civil No.
amujao Sing was appointed on February 21, 1978 and he expired on January 31, 1992.
Subsequently, by Office Memorandum dated August 31,1992, the Scheme was revised and in the revised Scheme it was expressly provided Since the appointment under the Scheme is meant only for giving immediate relief to the bereaved family, the application companyplete in all respect should be submitted to the companycerned Department within the one year from the date of expiry of the deceased Government servant.
936 of 1993 which has been allowed by the High companyrt by judgment dated June 29, 1995 for the same reasons as in the judgment referred to earlier in Civil Rule No.
285 of 1993 filed against the said decision of the High Court was dismissed in limine by this companyrt on February 15, 1993.
171 of 1993.
W I T H CIVIL APPEAL NO.
8228 OF 1996 arising out of S.L.P. Civil No.
After his death, by order dated July 15, 1992, he was companyfirmed on the post of work charged Truck Driver with effect from October 1, 1990.
amujao Singh, the respondent sought appointment under the Scheme.
The submission urged on behalf of the appellants that the Scheme was number applicable since the father of the respondent was a work charged employee was number accepted by the High Court and, in this regard, the High Court placed reliance on its earlier judgment in N. Arun Kumar Singh v. State of Manipur Ors.,
It appears that S.L.P. Civil No.
After the death of her husband, the respondent sough appointment under the Scheme.
In the impugned judgment the High Court has observed that the matter has been finally companycluded by this Court in dismissing the appeal and the said decision of this companyrt is binding under Article 141 of the companystitution.
Since she was number given appointment, she moved the Gauhati High Court by filing a writ petition Civil Rule No.
Amujao Singh, who was employed as a work charged Truck Driver with the Government of Manipur.
By Office Memorandum dated May 2, 1984 the Government of Manipur issued the Scheme for giving appointment to dependents of government servants who dies in harness.
L. Kumar Singh was appointed as work charged Handyman with effect from February 21, 1978 and he companytinued in such employment till he died on August 4, 1991.
After the death of Th.
19612 of 1995 J U D G M E N T C. AGARWAL, J. Leave granted Both these appeals raise companymon questions elating to appointment on companypassionate grounds under the Die in Harness Scheme for short the Scheme framed by the Government of Manipur.
He was companyfirmed on the post of work charged Handyman with effect from March 1, 1987.
In paragraph 3 of the Scheme, as initially framed it was provided The companycession under the above scheme shall also be applicable to those dependents mentioned in 2 above in respect of this work charged employees who died in harness By companyrigendum dated May 8, 1984 Office Memorandum dated May 2, 1984 was modified and paragraph 3 was substituted by the following provision The Scheme shall be applicable only to regular Government employees in a vacancy available in the department in which deceased employee worked.
