While respondent number1 in Civil Appeal No.5625 of 2006 claimed to be driver of the vehicle No.
APJ 1907, the respondent number1 in Civil Appeal No.5623 of 2006 claimed to be the cleaner of the vehicle.
Respondent number1 in Civil Appeal No.
5624 claimed to be employed in a different vehicle.
5625 of 2006 and Civil Appeal No.5624 of 2006 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Challenge in these appeals is to the judgment rendered in each case by learned Single Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court.
The claim petitions were adjudicated by the Commissioner for Workmens Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Nizamabad hereinafter referred to as the Commissioner .
In each case the claimant claimed to be either a labour or cleaner or driver of the vehicle which was involved in the accident.
With Civil Appeal Nos.
In order to prove the nature of injuries sustained and the alleged loss of earning capacity, a doctor was examined as witness.
Each of them filed a claim petition under Section 22 of the Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 in short the Act claiming companypensation for alleged personal injuries sustained in companyrse of employment.
Respondent number1 in each case was working as employee of respondent number2.
