After remand the appellate authority allowed the eviction petition of the landlady against the present appellant.
Thereafter the appellants revision before the High Court was also rejected.
2001 2 SCR 835 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MISRA, J. Leave granted.
Thereafter appellants filed appeal before this Court which remanded the case back to the appellate authority because High Court felt that the appellate authority erred in companysidering the evidence companypositely while companysidering the case under two provisions, namely, under Section 14 l b and Section 10 3 c , simultaneously though they are two separate and independent statutory provisions.
Then the appellants came to this Court through C.A. No.
The same was challenged by the appellant tenant in the revision before the High Court which was rejected.
