261, 297, 238, 241, 248, 263, 266, 271, 301, 302, 257, 237 296 299, 300, 283 and 284 of 1959.
351 of 1960.
A. Palkhivala, I. M. Nanavati, S. N. Andley J. B. Dadachanji, Rameshwar Nath and P. L. Vohra, for the appellants in C. A. No.
A. Palkhivala, J. B. Mehta, S. N. Andley, J. B. Dadachanji, Rameshwar Nath and P. L. Vohra, for the appellant in C.As.
M. Barot, for the respondent in C. As.
353 and 365 of 1960.
352 and 358 of 1960.
354, 359 and 367 of 1960.
J. Kolah, J. B. Mehta, S. N. Andley, J. B. Dadachanji, Rameshwar Nath and P. L. Vohra, for the appellants in C.As.
353 and 362 of 1960.
L. Hathi, for the respondent in C. As.
Appeals by special leave from the Award Part 1 of the Industrial Court, Bombay, in References IC Nos.
M. Nanavati, S. N. Andley, J. B. Dadachanji, Rameshwar Nath and P. L. Vohra, for the appellants in C. As.
354, 356, 363 365, 367 and 369 of 1960.
355, 359 361, 366 and 368 of 1960.
351 356 and 358 369 of 1960.
366 and 369 of 1960.
B. Mehta, S. N. Andley, J. B. Dadachanji, Rameshwar Nath and P. L. Vohra, for the appellants in C. As.
December 7.
was delivered by Wanchoo, J. Subba Rao, J. delivered a separate Judgment.
R. Vasavada, for the respondent in C. As.
351, 352, 355, 358, 360 364, and 368 of 1960.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeals Nos.
The Judgment of Gajendragadkar, Sarkar, Wanchoo and Mudholkar, JJ.
It further appears that numberice in the same terms was given to individual mills about the same time.
H. Shaikh, for the respondent in C. As.
