Briefly stated, leave was sought by the tenant on the ground that the landlords own several other properties in the vicinity of the tenanted premises from where they are carrying on business or have rented out the same.
As such, the tenanted premises i.e. No.38 UB, Jawahar Nagar, Kamla Nagar, Delhi is number bonafide required for the use of the landlords.
Hence the impugned order and the present appeal arising therefrom.
RANJAN GOGOI, J. Leave granted.
In reversal, the High Court held that the precise relationship between the two appellants and the holding interest of the first appellant in other items of property standing in the name of other family members require a probe for which leave ought to be granted.
The appellants, who are the landlords, seek to challenge the order dated 20.09.2012 passed by the High Court of Delhi granting leave to the respondent tenant to companytest the proceedings for his eviction under Section 14 1 e of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.
