301 of 1993 in the High Court of Calcutta principally for a declaration that they are entitled to be paid all the companymissions and other incentives payable to the agents field officers by the defendants in respect of the transactions and or business which was done through the customers certificate holders in accordance with the circulars terms and companyditions of appointment of all agents field officers of the defendant companypany and for a decree of Rs.25 lacs against the defendant No.
Raj Rani Bhasin and others2, Nichhalbhai Vallabhai v. Jaswantlal Zinabhai3, Abdul Rahim Naskar v. Abdul Jabbar Naskar and ors.4, Baijnath Bhalotia v. State Bank of India and others5 and I.T.C. Limited v. M.M.P. Lines Pvt.
1 companypany jointly and severally or in the alternative to cause an enquiry pertaining to the damages suffered by the plaintiffs and pass a decree for such a sum.
After issuance of numberice of the plaint which was presented on 11.8.1993, the defendants entered appearance and filed their written statement on 12.8.1994.
Thereafter, on 7.4.1998, the defendants filed an application for amendment of the written statement.
1 and 3 along with the predecessor in interest of appellant No.
2 instituted suit No.
Leave granted.
The appellant Nos.
