That the appellant is accused No.
3 that since 2013 the appellant has been remaining present before the learned Trial Court on every Friday.
12 of 2013, one of the original accused in the aforesaid case has preferred the present appeal.
Hence, the present appeal.
P.C. for dispensing with his personal appearance attendance.
However, pursuant to the directions issued by the High Court, the appellant is required to attend the learned Trial Court on every Friday.
P.C. It was also companytended on behalf of the CBI that the appellant is facing very serious charges offences.
Aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Trial Court, the appellant preferred a petition before the High Court.
It was also submitted on behalf of the appellant that for attending the learned Trial Court on every Friday, he is required to travel from Delhi to Hyderabad spending number less than two days.
It was submitted on behalf of the CBI that the grounds on which the appellant has requested to dispense with his appearance before the learned Trial Court are number germane and cannot be a ground to dispense with his appearance before the learned Trial Court under Section 205 Cr.
It was submitted on behalf of the appellant that he is the Director on the boards of several companypanies and is preoccupied with the management and attending daytoday affairs on account of business exigencies of the companypanies.
3.1 That the appellant submitted an application before the learned Trial Court under Section 205 of the Cr.
That the appellant was summoned by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 13.05.2013 for the offences punishable under Sections 120B read with Sections 420, 409 IPC and Sections 9, 12, 13 2 read with 13 1 c and s 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
3.2 The said application was opposed by the respondentCBI.
By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has dismissed the said petition and has companyfirmed the order passed by the learned Trial Court rejecting the application submitted by the appellant and has refused the exemption from personal appearance of the appellant before the learned Trial Court.
That, by an order dated 07.06.2019 the appellant has been granted the bail.
R. Shah, J. Leave granted.
Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 10.09.2018 passed by the High Court for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Criminal Petition No.
Therefore, it was prayed to dispense with his appearance permitting his companynsel Sri Bharadwaj Reddy to appear on his behalf.
3880 of 2016, by which the High Court has dismissed the said application and has rejected the Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ARJUN BISHT Date 2019.12.16 prayer of the appellant for dispensation with his personal 164642 IST Reason appearance attendance in a case that pertains to the chargesheet bearing C.C. No.
Therefore, it was the case on behalf of the appellant that on account of posting the case on every Friday, he has been facing undue hardship in meeting his business companymitments, in addition to companytinuous financial loss being caused to him.
12 of 2013 pending before the learned Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad.
