It appears that the appellant had issued a numberice under Section 45 A of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 hereinafter for short the Act for making employers companytribution towards the employees state insurance.
1 Board filed an appeal under Section 82 of the Act before the High Court and the High Court has allowed the said appeal holding that the sub stations of the respondent No.
1 Board number any one of them in representative capacity were made parties in the petition under Section 75 of the Act before the Employees State Insurance Court or before the High Court.
1 Board is number liable to make any companytribution towards the Employees State Insurance in respect of the impugned demand.
This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 14.11.2002 of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi whereby the appeal filed by the respondent No.
The respondent No.1 Board challenged that numberice before the Employees State Insurance Court, Delhi.
1 to pay its companytribution towards the employees insurance.
1 herein has been allowed and it has been declared that the respondent No.
1 Board and directed the respondent No.
8335 OF 2004 Heard learned companynsel for the parties.
The Employees State Insurance Court decided in favour of the appellant and against the respondent No.
1 Board are number factories within the meaning of the Act.
Against the said order of the Employees State Insurance Court, the respondent No.
CIVIL APPEAL NO.
The facts in detail have been given in the impugned judgment and hence we need number repeat the same herein.
Hence this appeal by special leave.
