34 of 1999 and companyfirmed the judgment and decree dated 26.03.1999 passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Karimnagar in O.S. No.
It was, inter alia, companytended that the plaintiff is number the owner and possessor of suit land.
We herein set out the facts, in brief, to appreciate the issue involved in this appeal.
743 of 2004 whereby the High Court allowed the second appeal filed by the plaintiff and set aside the Signature Not Verified judgment and decree dated 24.03.2004 passed by Digitally signed by ASHA SUNDRIYAL Date 2017.09.01 165436 IST Reason the Additional District Judge FTC , Karimnagar in S. No.
Felt aggrieved, defendant No.3 has filed this appeal by way of special leave before this Court.
On 20.01.1995, the defendants filed written statement and denied the claim of the plaintiff.
The Trial Court framed the issues and parties adduced their evidence.
By judgment decree dated 26.03.1999, the Trial Court decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff.
The High Court, by the impugned judgment dated 13.12.2005, allowed the appeal and set aside the judgment decree dated 24.03.2004 passed by the First Appellate Court in A.S. No.34 of 1999 and restored the judgment decree dated 26.03.1999 passed by the Trial Court in O.S. No.338 of 1994 which had decreed the plaintiffs suit.
Aggrieved by the said judgment decree, the defendants filed first appeal being Appeal Suit No.34 of 1999 before the Additional District Judge FTC , Karimnagar A.P. By judgment decree dated 24.03.2004, the Additional District Judge allowed the first appeal, set aside the judgment decree of the Trial Court and dismissed the suit.
hereinafter referred to as suit land in Survey No.1128/A situated at Mankanmathota in Karimnagar.
Against the said judgment decree, the plaintiff filed second appeal being S.A. No.743 of 2004 before the High Court.
2 is defendant No.3 son of late defendant No.2 and respondent No.3 is the wife of defendant No.2.
Defendant No.2 died during the pendency of the case before the High Court and his legal representative is respondent No.3 herein.
Respondent No.1 Plaintiff filed a suit for perpetual injunction against the defendants restraining them from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff in respect of land measuring 5 guntas and 7 sq.
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. This appeal is filed by defendant No.1 against the final judgment and order dated 30.12.2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Second Appeal No.
The appellant herein is defendant No.1, respondent No.1 is the plaintiff since dead and respondent No.
338 of 1994.
