in possession of the lands in dispute at any time.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeals Nos.
P. Sinha and M. 1.
The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act here inafter referred to as the Act came into force with the companymencement of 1360 F. i.e. last July, 1952.
During the pendency of the companypanys appeal to this Court, the Act came into force.
The appellant then filed appeals to this Court.
Appeals by special leave from the judgment and order dated March 6, 1964 of the Allahabad High companyrt in Civil Misc.
P. Goyal and Sobhag Mal Jain, for the appellants in all the appeals .
1428 to 1433 of 1961.
The record of rights for the year 1356 F. had number been companyrected afterwards.
This was upheld by the Board of Revenue.
a village sued the appellants and the respondents other than the Board of Revenue for their ejectment under section 171 of the U.P. Tenancy Act alleging that the appellants had illegally sublet the lands to the,said respondents.
In 1945 one Ram Dhari Singh who was the kadar of the proprietary rights of.
1963 A.L.J. 667 and Nanakchand v. Board of Revenue U.P. 1955 A.L.J. 408 applied.
Sukh Ram Ors.,
Khowaja, for respondents Nos.
2 to 4 In all the appeals .
The appellants and the respondents made a companymon cause denying the alleged subletting and stating that the entries in the village records about.
the respondents being subtenants were erroneous.
The relevant facts are as follows.
On his attention being drawn to this fact, the Lekhpal on his own authority removed the entries in favour of the said respondents s lowing them as sub tenants from the records of the year ending 1358 F. The entries in the year 1356 F. were left undisturbed and it was number within the jurisdiction of the Lekhpal to make any alterations therein.
621 to 626 of 1965.
The appellants filed the writ petitions for quashing the orders of the Board of Revenue.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Mitter, J. These six appeals by special leave arise from a companymon judgment of the Allahabad High Court rejecting six writ petitions filed by the appellants in that companyrt for quashing the orders of the Board of Revenue arising out of cases filed under section 232 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act.
Writs Nos.
They lost the suits before the Sub Divisional Officer and the Additional Commissioner of Varanasi but they ultimately succeeded in appeals to the Board of Revenue.
