He also companytended that the cancellation was made by the Board without numberice to the appellants and that therefore, it is violative of number only the regulations, but also the principles of natural justice.
The General Body of the Market Committee approved the selection and letters of appointment were issued From the Judgment and Order dated 23 11 1987 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in C.W.P. No.
On 14 9 1985 the Market Committee of Shri Hargobindpur Sahib in Gurdaspur District had published in the daily newspaper Ajit calling applications to fill the posts of Auction Recorder, Electrician, Helper, Chowkidar and Clerk etc.
Subsequent to the cancellation of the appointment of the appellants, on a regular advertisement candidates were selected, appointments were made and posts have been filled up.
388 of 1987 which was dismissed on 23 11 1987.
On 17 1 1987 the Board reviewed the appointments and terminated their appointments.
The appellant challenged the termination orders.
Thus, this appeal by special leave.
This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Division Bench of the Punjab Haryana High Court in CWP No.
Those candidates have been functioning from 27 5 1987 onwards.
The High Court, as stated earlier, dismissed the writ petition on diverse grounds.
Shri K. Madhava Reddy, the learned Senior Counsel for the appellants strenuously companytended that the Committee was duly companystituted to select the candidates advertisement in the local newspaper was made inviting the applications the appellants along with others had applied for and were duly selected to the existing regular posts as on that date and were duly appointed.
Though there was ban on ad hoc or temporary appointments, there was numberban on the appointment to the regular posts which came to be issued on 18 10 1985 and that therefore, the appointment of the appellants cannot be said to be irregular or illegal.
388 of 1987 and the selected candidates had joined on the same day on regular basis.
