Though the trial Court and the appellate Court had accepted the case of the appellant, the High Court has pointed out that aforesaid documents are material for deciding the companytroversy and the companyrts below had number companysidered those documents in proper perspective.
Under those circumstances, the question arises whether they are entitled to a decree of perpetual injunction restraining the appellant from interfering with his possession?
A 3 on July 21, 1961, he lawfully came into possession and the same was delivered in turn to the plaintiffs.After taking delivery of the possession on October 20, 1961, they assigned the Plaint Schedule property to the plaintiff.
A 3 dated 21.7.1963.
Leave granted.
