1112 of 2015 2 companyfirmed the companyviction of the original accused for the offences punishable under Section 376 2 f and Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code IPC as well as Sections 5 i , 5 m and 5 r read with Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 POCSO Act and has companyfirmed the death penalty imposed, original accused has preferred the present appeal.
That the appellant original accused was tried by the Trial Court for the offences punishable under Section 376 2 f and Section 201 of the IPC as well as Sections 5 i , 5 m and 5 r read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act for having companymitted the murder of the minor girl aged 71/2 years after raping her.
1112 of 2015 3 the offences under Section 376 2 f and Section 201 of the IPC as well as Sections 5 i , 5 m and 5 r read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act.
On companysidering the incriminating material against the accused and on appreciation the evidences and having companysidered that the accused was last seen together with the deceased and that the frock of the victim was found lying on the company along with blood stains on bed mattress and bedsheet in the house of the accused, which was number explained by the accused, and also companysidering the medical evidence, the Trial Court companyvicted the accused for Criminal Appeal No.
Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court, the companyviction and sentence of death penalty, the accused has preferred the present criminal appeal.
The Trial Court sentenced the accused to life imprisonment and other terms of the imprisonment with fine.
Being aggrieved with the companyviction and the sentence, the accused also preferred Criminal Appeal No.198 of 2014 before the High Court.
All the sentences were directed to run companycurrently.
Criminal Appeal No.
Having sentenced the accused with death penalty, the learned Additional Sessions Judge made the reference to the High Court.
By the impugned companymon judgment and order, the High Court has decided the reference against the accused and has also dismissed the criminal appeal preferred by the accused, whereby, the High Court has companyfirmed the companyviction and sentence imposed by the Trial Court.
Learned Additional Sessions Judge also sentenced the accused to death penalty.
1112 of 2015 4 We have heard learned companynsel appearing on behalf of the accused at length.
R.SHAH, J. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 02.07.2014 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur passed in Criminal Appeal No.198 of 2014 by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal and companyfirmed the judgment and order dated 23.12.2013 Signature Not Verified SUSHIL KUMAR RAKHEJA passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rehli, District Digitally signed by Date 2019.02.13 164520 IST Reason Sagar, Madhya Pradesh in Sessions Trial No.49 of 2013 and has Criminal Appeal No.
