The application was rejected by the Appellate Court forming an opinion that the application was a bald application number setting out any facts relevant to the exercise of jurisdiction by the Appellate Court by reference to any of the clauses a , aa and b of sub rule 1 of Rule 27 of Order XLI.
The prayer was reiterated by the appellants in the High Court but it met with the same fate and for the same reasons.
Feeling aggrieved, the defendant appellants have filed this appeal by special leave.
A suit for issuance of permanent preventive injunction was filed by the plaintiff respondents against the defendant appellants.
Arising out of S.L.P. C No.24319 of 2003 C. Lahoti, J. Leave granted.
The decree has been maintained by the First Appellate Court as also by the High Court.
The suit was decreed by the trial companyrt.
