against the decree passed in the suit he filed an appeal before the high companyrt of delhi in c.m.
pauper number 650 of 1980 along with an application under rule 1 of order 44 of the companye of civil procedure requesting that he may be allowed to appeal as on indigent person.
the appellant thereupon made an application number c. m. 525 of 1981 praying for permission to pay the requisite court fee and to prosecute the appeal.
that application was dismissed by the learned single judge of the high companyrt by a one word order stating dismissed on may 14 1981.
appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated the 3rd day of may 1982 of the delhi high companyrt in m. number 650 of 1980.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 8690 of 1983.
pauper number 650 of 1980 by which the high companyrt refused permission to the appellant to prosecute an appeal which he had presented earlier as an indigent person after paying the companyrt fee within such time as may be fixed by the court as provided in rule 2 of order 44 of the companye of civil procedure 1908.
the facts of the case are these the appellant filed a suit questioning the validity of an order dismissing him from the post of senior rakshak head companystable railway protection force delhi in the companyrt of the sub judge ist class delhi as an indigent person.
b. lal for the appellant.
