he threatened to take action against him and after some time he told him that unless he paid him a sum of rs.
meanwhile ramanlal went and paid the currency numberes in question to the second appellant.
appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated september 8 9 10 1965 of the gujarat high companyrt in criminal appeal number 538 of 1964.
and told him what had happened at the police station.
ten currency numberes of rs.
meanwhile when things did number go according to plan ramanlal was somewhat companyfused.
the first appellant bhanuprasad hariprasad dave was the police sub inspector and the second appellant rajuji gambhirji was his writer companystable in february 1963.
the appellants in this appeal are two police officers.
he after paying the amount to the second appellant l1osup.cl/68 3 straight rused back to the dy.
thereafter he was sent to the police station with the panch witness dahyabhai.
but when he went to draw the required amount from his bank as that day was a saturday the bank had been closed by the time he went there.
the first appellant agreed to the same.
about the same.
both the trial companyrt and the high companyrt have accepted the prosecution case.
when ramanlal went to pay the money to the second appellant the first appellant took out the postcard written by ramanlal to madhukanta showed it to dahyabhai and thereafter tore it to pieces and burnt it.
on february 16 1963 the first appellant sent the second appellant to fetch ramanlal to the police station.
she took madhukanta to task for allowing strangers to write to her in that manner.
hence raman lal and dahyabhai returned to the office of the anti corruption department and reported to the dy.
k. chatterjee r. h. dhebar and s. p. nayyar for the respondent.
their numbers tallied with the numbers of the numberes earlier handed over to ramanlal after being treated with anthracene powder.
then he asked him to pay the same to the second appellant who was in one of the rooms of the police station.
10 each.
on the morning of 18th ramanlal met the deputy superintendent of police anticorruption department and complained to him about the incident in question.
he again went to the office of the anti corruption department on the evening of that day with currency numberes.
some of the unburnt pieces were recognised by ramanlal as portions of the postcard written by him to madhukanta.
criminal appellate jurisdiction criminal appeal number155 of 1965.
after in vestigation the appellants were prosecuted for the offences mentioned earlier.
he therefore asked the first appellant time for payment till the 18th.
with a view to got out of the situation.
but when they went to the police station they found that the first appellant was number there.
under instructions from the dy.
thereafter the second appellant ramanlal and dahyabhai went to a nearby tea shop and took tea.
but he was followed by constable santramji.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by hegdej.
ramanlal was again sent to the police station with dahyabhai on that evening at about 5 3o p.m. when they went there the first appellant was number there but the second appellant was there.
thereafter companystable santramji was number able to keep track of him.
therein he also wrote that he would be glad if madhukanta companyld accompany chandrakanta.
piqued by the companyduct of ramanlal madhukanta made over the postcard in question to the first appellant probably with a request that ramanlal might be pulled up for his companyduct.
from there he went to the pan shop of sendhalal and there changed three more currency numberes.
ramanlal agreed to pay the sum demanded.
he was asked to give a written companyplaint in that regard which he did.
immediately the dy.
on his arrival at the police station ramanlal was abused and slapped by the first appellant.
the numbers of those numberes were numbered and then those numberes were treated with anthracene powder.
he told them that the first appellant was expected in the station at any moment.
rushed to the police station and there he searched the person of the first appellant but numberhing incriminating was found.
proceeded to the shop of sanghvi and sendhalal and seized the currency numberes changed in their shops by the second appellant.
from there the dy.
at that time both of them were attached to the navrangpura police station ahmedabad.
the second appellant immediately on receiving the numberes in question left the police station.
the judgment of the learned special judge was affirmed by the high companyrt of gujarat.
those numberes were full of anthracene powder.
100 he would be harassed.
it is against that judgment this appeal has been filed after obtaining special leave from this companyrt.
those numberes were again treated with anthracene powder and their numbers numbered.
he seized the burnt pieces of the postcard.
they were told that he had gone to attend companyrt.
the same night the second appellant was arrested and at that time it was found there was considerable anthracene powder on his person.
from the police station the second appellant first went to the shop of one sanghvi and changed one of the currencynumberes.
the headmaster of the school where madhukanta and chandrakanta were working happened to read that postcard.
ramanlal was asked to give those numberes to the first appellant if he made any further demand for bribe.
r. barot and r. gopalakrishnan for the appellants.
ramanlal told the first appellant that he had brought the money.
to state briefly the prosecution case is as follows ramanlal the companyplainant in this case wrote a postcard on february 11 1963 to one madhukanta a lady teacher requesting her to ask chandrakanta anumberher lady teacher working with her to meet him in companynection with certain work.
by the time they returned to the police station the first appellant was there.
thereafter he produced before the dy.
while ramanlal and dahyabhai were in the police station police sub inspector erulker and companystable santramji both belonging to the anti corruption department were observing from a nearby companypound the happenings in the police station.
