Aggrieved by this Order, an appeal was preferred before the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal as LRA No.
2003 3 SCR 870 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G. BALAKRISHNAN, J. The father of the appellant number.
The said provision came into effect from 15.5.1986.
Appellants 4 5 and 6 were major daughters and they were married at the time of companymencement of the Ceiling Act and appellant number.
1107/77 which was partly allowed.
Aggrieved by this Order, a revision petition C.R.P. No.
Appellant No.
We heard the appellants Counsel and the Counsel for the State.
The High Court permitted them to urge the additional ground.
Pending this Revision application, there was a State amendment to Section 29 of the Hindu Succession Act whereby Section 29A was inserted.
6 and 7 were minors on that date, and were unmarried.
7171/79 was filed before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh.
4 and 5 married prior to 15.5.1986.
The sixth appellant was married on 29.8.1986, i.e., after the companymencement of Section 29 A .
However, during the pendency of the Revision, B. Chandrashekhar Reddy died and his LRs were impleaded.
Appellants 6 and 7 were minor daughters as on 1.1.75, the date of the companymencement of the Act.
6, Kumudini Devi was born on 1.5.1962 and the appellant number 7 Sridevi was born on 2.3.1971.
Appellant No.
However, the pleas raised by them were number allowed by the High Court and aggrieved by the same, the present appeal is filed.
The appellants companytended that they were entitled to the benefit of Section 29 A and thus an additional ground was sought to be raised in the Revision Petition.
By Order dated 23.1.1977, the Tribunal held that family of late B. Chandrashekhar Reddy was entitled to hold one standard holding under the Act and the excess of 4.3360 standard holdings was held to be surplus land.
2,4 5 to 7, late Chandrashekhar Reddy, the husband of appellant number 3, filed two separate declarations under the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings , Act, 1973.
