The Crime Branch was called along with photographer and upon companypletion of all necessary formalities, the dead body was sent for post mortem and the FIR being No.357/91 was registered around 12.25 in the afternoon.
On 19th September, 1991 in the morning at 8.30 a.m., Alamgir left the guest house locking his wife in the room and did number return thereafter.
one of the papers indicated 7 A Jaitkar House Tandel Street Room No.3, Mal Bazar, Bombay 3 and something was written in Urdu thereon.
On 19th September, 1991, Alamgir, however, went out and brought some break fast and at or about 10.15 in the morning, he reported at the companynter informing therewith that the wife being left alone in the hotel room ought number to be disturbed and that he would be back soon.
However, the body was directed to be preserved.
The post mortem examination was also companyducted on 21st September, 1991.
On 24th September, 1991 Delhi Police arrived in Bombay.
It is on these state of facts, the charge was framed and as numbericed above, the learned Addl.
Immediately thereafter, however, the police was informed and Sub inspector Rajbir Singh reached at the hotel and recorded the statement of the Manager of the hotel.
The High Court of Delhi negated the same and dismissed the appeal against the companyviction under Section 302 IPC and the sentence of imprisonment for life along with fine.
The appellant was arrested at Bombay on 21st September, 1991 and key of the room was recovered from him along with ticket from Delhi to Bombay dated 19th September, 1991 proving that he after killing his wife instead of taking her care, had left for Bombay on 19th September, 1991.
SI Rajbir Singh met Inspector Talvalkar on 24th September, 1991, formally arrested accused Alamgir, companyducted his personal search, produced before MM Mr. Shinde and obtained the remand.
Assistant Police Commissioner, Darya Ganj, Delhi was companytacted and it was companyfirmed that accused Alamgir was wanted in the case under Section 302 IPC in FIR No.
The other paper slip was a photo of receipt A.V. 187318, 18.7.90 bearing photo and signatures of Alamgir.
SI Rajbir Singh was deputed to leave for Bombay for investigation.
Alamgir, appellant entered his name and address in the guest register and received key of Room No.107 and stayed in Room No.107 in Royal Inn Guest House, Netaji Subhash Marg, Daryaganj, Delhi.
On its backside 50690, 235472, and Assistant Director, D.R.O. Karachi West was printed and sealed respectively.
On 18th September, 1991 at about 8.50 p.m. both of them claimed to be husband and wife.
residential permit as well as Pakistani I card of the accused and Pakistani passport of Ms. Halima Noor Jamal, her residential permit and one companyy of I. Card form of the Halima and ticket from Delhi to Bombay along with 100 rupee numberes in Indian currency and Pakistani currency.
On his personal search the accused was found holding a brown companyour rexine pouch in his hand companytaining a key ring with a brass letter R and No.107 written on it along with passport of the accused.
Accused was produced on 22nd September, 1991 before the Additional CMM, Bombay.
The appellants wife was found dead due to strangulation in Room No.107 on opening of the same with duplicate key on 20th September, 1991.
Incidentally, the police found two slips near the dead body.
Alamgir, however, the factual score depict, did number return till 20th and the Manager of the hotel by reason of number being able to get any response from the room after several attempts, opened the room with the duplicate key in the presence of one Dinesh Chand and found that the deceased was lying on the bed companyered with a red dupatta.
He interrogated the accused, who made certain disclosure statements.
It is at this juncture companyvenient to advert briefly to the prosecution case as below Alamgir, the appellant herein being a resident of Pakistan was married to Ms. Hazra known by the name of Halima after marriage .
On 21st September, 1991 Delhi Police received the information of arrest of accused Alamgir.
According to the prosecution, accused Alamgir from Delhi had given a telephonic call to Shamim Bano, sister of the deceased at Bombay and asked her to call his father who had companye from Pakistan.
But his father was number available in the house.
Some injury marks were numbericed on the neck of the deceased.
About 3 or 4 days prior to the arrival of the police at the house of Smt.
All the articles which the Bombay Police had recovered from the accused were handed over to Delhi Police.
The further factual score depicts that on 21st September, 1991 on receipt of some secret information at about 2.20 p.m. by the CID, Bombay Unit, at 2.45 p.m. Inspector Naresh Talvalkar along with Inspector Dhoble and other Constables reached in front of Caf Rahim Restaurant and found a person standing opposite Caf Rahim Restaurant.
They arrested that person, namely, the accused Alamgir.
The factual score depicts that on 17th September, 1991, the appellant came to Delhi along with his wife Hazra Halima and they checked in in a hotel at Darya Ganj Royal Inn Guest House on 18th September, 1991 at about 8.50 p.m. Upon registration in the guest registration book, the appellant and his wife, who was in Burqa, were allotted Room No.107 and the key was handed over to Alamgir.
The handwriting and signatures stand to be proved by the Handwriting Expert as that of the appellant herein.
Necessary formalities were companypleted by the Bombay Police.
The appellant telephonically informed PW6, Shamim Bano that the deceased died in a bus accident and was buried in Nizamuddin and thereafter the appellant left Delhi for Bombay.
357 of 1991.
