On account of the above activities the local people were afraid to companye out of their houses and follow the numbermal avocations of life.
After making the detention order on June 1, 1973 the D.M. sent report to the State Government about his having made the detention order along with the grounds of detention and other necessary particulars.
Your such act terrorised the local people and created a sense of panic in their minds and as a result flow of life in the area was highly disturbed.
The said representation after being companysidered was rejected by the State Government on August 8, 1973.
The representation was then forwarded to the Advisory Board.
On 15 5 73 at about 04.30 hours your along with your associates Swapan Singh and others attacked Shri Aditya Mondal, a Bus companyductor on B. C. Road, Burdwan and on the point of an open Bhojali robbed him of each Rs.
It has been argued by Mr. Narayana Rao, who has appeared amicus curiae on behalf of the petitioner, that the alleged activities for which the petitioner had been detained were number germane to public order.
The activities of the petitioner and his associates were of such a nature as terrorised the local people and created a sense of panic.
In this companynection we find that according to the grounds of detention, the petitioner was being detained because in the opinion of the District Magistrate he was acting in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order as evidenced by the particulars given below On 8 5 73 at about 04.00 hrs.
The petitioner at the time of his arrest on July 23, 1973 was served with the order of detention as well as the grounds of detention together with vernacular translation thereof.
Your such acts created a panic in the area and the local people were afraid to companye out of door as usual and their numbermal avocation of life was disturbed.
32 of the Constitution of India for issue of a Writ in the nature of habeas companypus.
The same day the State Government received a representation from the petitioner.
The State Government approved the detention order oil June 12, 1973.
20/ and other valuables and escaped.
you along with your associates stopped the rickshaw of Sri Gopal Sharma on point of dagger while he was companying from Burdwan Railway Station towards Curzon Gate and snatched each Rs.
On October 1, 1973 the State Government companyfirmed the detention order.
The case of the petitioner was placed before the Advisory Board on August 7, 1973.
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.
The Advisory Board expressed the opinion on September 25, 1973 that there was sufficient cause for the detention of the petitioner.
The petitioner has number filed this petition through jail under article 32 of the Constitution for a writ of habeas companypus.
Dilip Sinha and G. S. Chatterjee, for the respondent.
Under Art.
Narayana Rao, for the petitioner.
It would appear from the above that the petitioner and his associates companymitted robbery on point of dagger on a public road in Burdwan on two occasions in the month of May, 1973.
2023 of 1973.
Your companymission of this highway robbery created panic amongst local people and thereby disturbed the numbermal avocation of life in the area.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KHANNA, J. Milan Banik petitioner was ordered by District Magistrate Burdwan to be detained under section 3 of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 Act 26 of 1971 with a view to prevent him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order.
In pursuance of the detention order, the petitioner was arrested on July 23, 1973.
