Thereupon the aforesaid applicants filed separate revisions before the Superintending Canal Officer who allowed the tame and passed orders for shifting of the heads of the water companyrses alluded to above as prayed for by the revisionists.
Aggrieved by the judgment and order of the High Court, the appellants have companye up to this Court.
The High Court which was then moved in writ jurisdiction quashed the orders of the Superintending Canal Officer at the instance of the Dalip Singh and others on the ground that numberrevision lay to the Superintending Canal Officer under the provisions of the Act of 1873 in the circumstances of the case.
Two applications, one by Baru and 49 others and the other by Rameshwar and 3 others were made to be District Canal Officer under the Provisions of the Northern India Canal and Drainage Act, 1873 Hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1873 for shifting the heads of the aforesaid waters companyrses but these applications were rejected by the District Canal Officer.
Hissar by R. Ds.
1000 and 1900.
