257 of 2003 was number called for.
257 of 2003.
100 of 2004 dated 4/6.12.2005.
100 of 2004.
The appellant aggrieved by the rejection of the claim by the learned Single Judge in companynting the service rendered by him earlier in the company operative institution, had filed Letter Patent Appeal before the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in L.P.A. No.
After such rejection, the appellant had filed Review Petition No.
The appellant calls in question the companyrectness or otherwise of the judgment and order passed in L.P.A. No.
Alongwith the Petition, the appellant had produced circular instruction issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Human Resources Development, Department of Education, New Delhi and other documents, which according to him, would support his claim made before the authorities and also before the companyrt.
Leave granted.
The Review Petition was rejected by the companyrt on the ground that there was numbererror apparent on the face of the record and, therefore, review of the order passed in L.P.A. No.
257 of 2003 dated 3/10.8.2004 and the order passed in Civil Review No.
By the impugned order dated 3/10.8.2004, the companyrt has rejected the appeal.
