Both the Tribunal and the High Court were number justified in assessing the amount of companypensation pay able to the appellants at Rs.
Hence this appeal by special leave.
1 that her husband had an income of Rs.
The High Court has number disbelieved the evidence of the appellant No.
As a result of the accident, Hari Singh died on the spot and one Shanker Lal who was also travelling in the same car and happened to be the friend of Hari Singh received some injuries.
A cross objection was also filed by the Rajasthan Mahila Parishad, the owner of the car.
From the Judgment and Order dated 10.12.1976 of the Rajasthan High Court in D .B. Civil Misc.
At the time of his death, Hari Singh was only 25.
Being aggrieved by the award of the Tribunal, the appel lants preferred an appeal to the Rajasthan High Court chal lenging only the adequacy of the amount of companypensation as awarded by the Tribunal.
As against this evidence, numberevidence was led by the respond ents regarding the income of the deceased.
1 who was only 18 and the appellant No.
The High Court, as stated already, affirmed the award and dis missed the appeal and the cross objection.
It skidded and hit against a tree.
M. Lodha and H.M. Singh for the Appellants.
1,000 and that out of the said income, about Rs.700 used to be spent and the total saving was only Rs.300 a month.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
1 that the father of the deceased had a dairy farm, a poultry farm, a flour mill and an agricultural farm.
He left behind him his wife, the appellant No.
1 and the father of the appellant No.
The deceased used to look after the business and his monthly income was about Rs.
2086 N of 1978.
73 of 1970.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DUTT, J. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of the Rajasthan High Court affirming the award made by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Udaipur.
2, hired an Ambassador car belonging to the.
R. Sabharwal, P.R. Ramasesh and H. Wahi for the Re spondents.
1,000 a month.
Rajasthan Mahila Parishad for going to his native village at Kangeti in Madhya Pradesh from Udai pur in Rajasthan.
In the night between the 3rd and 4th December, 1966, Hari Singh, since deceased, the husband of the appellant No.
When the car had gone 21 miles from Udai pur, it companylided with a truck companying from the opposite direction.
Appeal No.
