1524, 1537 1580 of 1973 and 74, 75, 254, 510 512 of 19702 21 of 1971 and 1525 1581 1606 of 1973.
2 in W. P. No.
K. Sen, Yogeshwar Prasad, S. K. Bagga and S. Bagga, for the petitioners in W.Ps.
1524 and 1537 1580/73 .
The petitioners in all the above cases are traders or companymission agents dealing in agricultural produce.
1524, 1537 1580173 .
1 3 in W.P. 75 and 510 512/70 .
P. Rana, for respondents in W.Ps.
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petitions Nos.
10 of 1970 briefly called the Act and the rules made thereunder are challenged on the ground of violation of Article 14 and Article 19 1 g of the, Constitution.
74/70 , Hardyal Hardy in W.P. No.
32 of the Constitution of India.
XXV of 1964 as amended by U.P. Act No.
74, 254/70, 21171, 1525, 1581 1606/73 and respondents number.
Petitions under Art.
75/70 , Yogeshwar Prasad, S. K. Bagga and S. Bagga, for the petitioners in W.P. Nos 74, 75, 254 and 510 512/70, 21/71 and 1525, 1581 1606/1973 .
M. Tarkunde and E. C. Agarwala, for respondent No.
K. Sea, in W.P. No.
75/70.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Goswami, J. By the above writ applications under Article 32 of the Constitution the validity of the Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadhan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 U.P. Act No.
75/70 and applicant intervener in W.P. No.
N. Sinha, Solicitor General and O. P. Rana, for respondents in W.Ps.
