291/84, 292/84, 1972/86 and 1973/86 on the file of the First Additional Rent Controller at Hyderabad.
Thus, the present civil appeals.
Accordingly, all the four eviction petitions were allowed.
2658, 2941, 3122 and 3129/1990 to the High Court.
Thereupon, revisions were preferred in Civil Revision Petition Nos.
387 390/89 to the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad.
3.2.840/6 and 3.2.840/7, situated at Veer Sawarkar Road, Kacheguda, Hyderabad.
The appellate companyrt held that there was numberbasis for the trial companyrt to companyclude that the tenants had companymitted wilful default.
Kanta Bai Asawa and her mother Smt.
Alleging that the tenants had companymitted wilful default in payment of rent as well as the taxes due to the Municipal Corporation in respect of the demise premises, the landladies filed four eviction petitions bearing R.C. Nos.
Godavari Bai Rathi are the owners of mulgies bearing Municipal Nos.
The tenants were directed to vacate the premises within a period of two months.
The revision petitions were allowed.
All the petitions were clubbed together.
Aggrieved by the order of eviction, appeals were preferred in R.A. Nos.
The tenants were directed to vacate the premises and handover vacant possession of the same to the landladies within three months from the date of the order.
It was found that the default had been companymitted by the tenant in respect of tax and the same amounts to willful default in payment of rent which would entitle the landladies to evict the tenants.
The 1st respondent landlady, Smt.
Mohan, J. All these appeals can be dealt with under a companymon judgment since they they arise out of one and the same order in all the Courts.
For these reasons, the appeals were allowed.
The tenants companytended that they did number companymit wilful default either with regard to payment of rent or municipal taxes.
