When they asked them to let them pass, one of the accused with whom an altercation had taken place in the club, threatened to teach them a lesson.
Being aggrieved by cancellation of bail, Anil Kumar Yadav A4 preferred appeal before this Court.
4574/2017 ETC.
Vide order dated 16.06.2017, this Court issued numberice and stayed surrender of Anil Kumar Yadav A4 .
bail to the appellant and the High Court erred in interfering with the exercise of discretion by the Sessions Court.
The petitioner has also placed on record photographs developed from the footage recorded in the CCTV.
The case of prosecution is that on 21.10.2015, Rohit Bansal injured witness along with his friends Vineet, Sonu, Rupesh deceased and Monu had gone to Shanghai Club, Hauz Khas in two separate cars, i.e. Santro being registration No.
By virtue of the first impugned order, bail granted to Anil Kumar Yadav A4 was cancelled and by the second impugned order, bail granted to other accused were cancelled.
Thereafter, all the accused assailants started beating them one of the assailants brought an iron rod from the car and started hitting Rupesh and when Rohit intervened to save Rupesh, he was also attacked.
UP 16 AM 6317 and Honda Civic being registration No.
The Sessions Court pointed out that possibly numberrole companyld be attributed to accused Anil Kumar Yadav and observed as under Admittedly, the crux of the CCTV footage is deciphered by the IO in the chargesheet as mentioned above and in the said crux numberrole of accused Anil Kumar Yadav is found.
When Rohit Bansal returned back to take his car, he saw Rupesh lying at Page No.
the spot unconscious and sustained multiple injuries on his body.
The respondent is seen entering into the Mercedes.
already been granted bail and that they were in custody for about one and half years.
SLP CRL.
Thereafter, the companyplainant Rohit Bansal and his friends were sent out of the club and after companying out of the club when they reached IIT Gate, then Rohit Bansal realized that his mobile phone was missing which might have fallen during the quarrel and he along with his friends Rupesh, Sonu and Monu came back in Santro car to the club.
5 of 23 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
At around midnight 12.00 12.15, while dancing in the club, Rohit Bansals hand struck an individual to whom he said sorry.
Being aggrieved, other accused have also filed their respective appeals before this Court.
3 of 23 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
Upon companypletion of the investigation, charge sheet was filed under Sections 302 and 308 IPC read with Section 34 IPC against Tarun Maddy A1 , Vikas Shammi A2 , Ashish Balguer A3 , Anil Kumar Yadav A4 , Vikas Balguer A5 and Vishal Balguer A6 charge sheet against Siddhant Goldy A7 was filed under Section 201/212 IPC.
The trial companyrt granted bail to Anil Kumar Yadav A4 vide order dated 27.02.2017, inter alia, on the grounds i that numberother overt act had been attributed to Anil Kumar Yadav A4 ii Based on CCTV Page No.
While the appeal against grant of bail to Anil Kumar Yadav A4 was under companysideration before the High Court, rest of the accused were granted bail by the Sessions Court vide order dated 24.04.2017, inter alia, on the ground that companyaccused Anil Kumar Yadav A4 had Page No.
When they came back, they found that a Mercedes and EON car had blocked the road and a Bolero car was parked on the road side.
Thereafter, another assailant lifted a cemented brick and hit Rupesh on his head and they all ran towards different directions to save themselves leaving Santro car at the spot.
On 27.02.2017, charges were framed against all the accused and bail was granted to appellant Anil Kumar Yadav.
the accused along with their cars were blocking the road and iii accused Anil Kumar Yadav has been in custody since 31.10.2015.
By order dated 08.09.2017, the High Court cancelled the bail granted to other accused also.
On this, the said individual abused Page No.
Complainant Rohit along with one Sunil took Rupesh to the AIIMS Hospital and got him admitted in the Trauma Centre.
When the appeal of Anil Kumar Yadav A4 came up for further hearing before this Court, State took time to take steps to challenge the order of grant of bail to other accused also.
BANUMATHI, J. Leave granted.
These appeals arise from the order of the High Court of Delhi in and by which the High Court has cancelled the bail granted to the respondents accused by two separate orders dated 31.05.2017 and 08.09.2017.
DL 7CF 4118.
