In fact the respondent tenant did number leave India on the date of partnership he left much thereafter and actually on the date on which his statement was recorded by the rent companytroller.
At least at one place the appellate authority has belaboured under a factual misapprehension when it stated that on the very date of entering into partnership the respondent tenant had left India for Iraq.
In such facts and circumstances, the High Court has number erred in reversing the judgment of the appellate companyrt and restoring that of the trial companyrt.
