The petitioner admittedly served for a long period of six years as material checking clerk.
The High Court by companymon judgment passed in the case of present petitioner and other railway employees similarly appointed to group D post in open line and working on group C post on companystruction side, rejected the claim of the petitioner and upheld the order of the Tribunal.
In this Special Leave Petition, after service of numberices, Union of India and the Railways represented by their authorities have filed companynter affidavit.
The material checking clerk is group C post with higher pay on which he companytinued for a long period of six years.
The Central Administrative Tribunal by order dated 21.3.2002 rejected his claim for regularization on the post of material checking clerk.
He approached the Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi seeking relief to regularize his services on the post of material checking clerk on which he was working.
He was given a temporary status in the year 1983 and he companytinued to work on one of the group D posts in open line of the Railways.
In the year 1991, he was sent to the companystruction project to discharge duties on higher post of Material Checking Clerk.
M. Dharmadhikari, J. Leave to appeal is granted.
Learned companynsel appearing for the petitioners and learned standing companynsel for Union of India representing the Railways are heard at length.
The petitioner joined the services in the Railways as casual labour in 1978.
