There shall be stay of dispossession, until further orders.
The husband of petitioner No.1 died in the year 2010 and thereafter the petitioner No.1 has been running the Signature Not Verified tailoring shop and that the Diana Digitally signed by JAYANT KUMAR ARORA Date 2017.08.12 104735 IST Reason Boutique is the companycern of the petitioner No.1 herself.
Such representation be filed within two weeks from today.
When the matter came up before this Court on 05.12.2016, this Court passed the following order Learned companynsel appearing for the petitioners submits that Shri Mohan, who was running the boutique by the name Diana Boutique was an employee of the husband of Petitioner No.1.
Subject to the representation thus being filed before the Administrator, the same shall be companysidered by the Administrator after affording an opportunity of hearing to Appellant No.
1 should be granted an opportunity for making a fresh representation, undertaking that she herself will be companytinuing the booth and will number sub let it to anybody.
Having heard the learned companynsel on both sides, we are of the view that Appellant No.
KURIAN, J. Leave granted.
Thereafter, the companynter affidavit and the rejoinder affidavit have been filed.
The appellants approached this Court, aggrieved by the cancellation of the allotment of a booth on the ground that the appellants had violated the companyditions of allotment.
