A revision petition filed by the respondent before the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Andhra Pradesh was partly allowed by his order dated 19.11.2001 to the extent that the order of dismissal from service was modified to removal from service.
500/ per month in 130 installments The suspension period from 24.8.1996 to 17.4.197 be regularised towards Earned Leave available to the respondent.
1157 of 2002 allowing the same and directing that the respondent herein be reinstated in service.
The reasoning of the Administrative Tribunal was duly companysidered and endorsed by the High Court in the Writ Petition filed by the appellants herein.
The Tribunal also took numbere of the fact that a companyy of the Enquiry Officers report had number been supplied to the respondent although the same was mandatory under Rule 20 of the Andhra Pradesh Civil Services Classification, Control and Appeal Rules.
Misappropriation of Rs.
The said authority upon going through the materials was of the view that it was a clear case of misappropriation of Government funds which entailed more punishment than had been awarded by the Divisional Forest Officer.
3817 of 2005 filed by the appellants herein.
The respondents case was, therefore, reopened in terms of Rule 18 2 of the Andhra Pradesh Civil Services Classification, Control and Appeal Rules, 1991 and a show cause numberice was issued to the respondent in terms of Rule 37 2 v directing him to show cause as to why he should number be removed from service.
54,625.00, c by number maintaining the muster rolls and number payment of wages of Rs.4865.00 to the labourers, resulting in embezzlement of the money.
Upon companysidering the reply submitted by the respondent, the Conservator of Forests passed order dated 11.7.2001 dismissing the respondent from service.
580.00 companylected towards Cfees, by number issuing CF.140 receipt to the accused.
Despite having received such funds, he did number undertake the said work and disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him on the following charges 1.
According to the appellants, during the said period the appellant was advanced funds to carry out different works under the Andhra Pradesh Forestry Project.
1104 OF 2008 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION CIVIL NO.
a Neglect of duty with mala fide intention by number depositing the Government funds in the Joint Account Bank thereby causing embezzlement of Government money of Rs.
64,725/ at the rate of Rs.
The Writ Petition was filed challenging the order dated 23.11.2004 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, in O.A. No.
CIVIL APPEAL NO.
297 OF 2006 ALTAMAS KABIR, J. Leave granted.
Aggrieved by the said order of punishment passed by the Divisional Forest Officer, Kothagudem, the respondent filed an appeal to the Conservator of Forests, Khammam Circle, Khammam.
This appeal at the instance of the Divisional Forest Officer, Kothagudem and other officers of the Ministry of Forests, Government of Andhra Pradesh is directed against the judgment and order dated 9.3.2005 passed by the Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissing the Writ Petition No.
Having been found guilty of both the charges by the Divisional Forest Officer, the following punishment was imposed upon the respondent, namely, i 5 Annual Grade Increments was stopped with cumulative effect apart from recovery of Government losses of Rs.
Delay companydoned.
From the materials as disclosed, it appears that the respondent herein was appointed as a Forester on 7.4.1994 and was posted in Section Komararam from 7.4.1994 to 24.8.1996.
