As stated the deceased was married to the first respondent on March 1, 1979 by her brother Harbans Lal, PW.
The stomach was empty.
They also participated in bringing the dead body to the ground floor and kept the body on a slab of ice and informed PW.15 and others by telegram and also the police.
15 gave on June 8, 1980 Rs.
On dissection of neck there was infilteration of blood in the upper part of the neck in front below chin.
It is his case that Satish Kumar made extra judicial companyfession that the deceased was strangulated for number getting the dowry of their demand and that she was burnt to destroy the evidence and sought pardon of him.
By the time they came home they saw some people bringing the dead body from the upstairs.
The mouth was closed.
Tongue was swollen and cynosed.
Due to 95 burns PW.1, the doctor, did number find any visible ligature marks on the neck.
The defence set up by the respondents was that the relationship between the deceased and the first respondant was companydial.
Giving the benefit of doubt to the brother and the parents of the respondent they were acquitted.
He sent for his people.
The crucial question is whether medical evidence of the doctor is reliable and acceptable and whether death due to suicide is probable?
The Sessions Judge disbelieved the extra judicial companyfession spoken to by PW.15 and others.
PW.1 Dr. Sher Singh held the autopsy and found that the death was due to asphyxia.
On further dissection he found fracture on right companynua of hyoid bone at the junction with its body and on opening the larynx and pharynx, he numbered blood stained forth in their cavities, they were ante mortem in nature.
Except both the feet there were burns all over the body.
281 DB of 1981 and 528 DB of 1981.
The narrative of the facts clearly establishes that the young beautiful lady, aged about 22 years, who had intense and passionate love for the first respondent yearning to have long and happy marital life was exterminated hardly one year and five months after the marriage.
From the Judgment and Order dated 25.11.81 of the Punjab Haryana High Court in Criminal Appeals Nos.
The police laid the charge under section 302 read with sections 34 and 201 I.P.C. against all the respondents.
He received a telegram on August 10, 1980 at Sasuna, Punjab State that Shashi Bala died.
Shashi Bala, a beautiful young lady of 20 years was married to Satish Kumar, the first respondent, on March 1, 1979 and she met with a homicidal death on August 10, 1980 in her marital home.
The prosecution adduced evidence of PWs9 15 of the motive of demand for more dowry extra judicial companyfession and recoveries etc.
22 to 25 of 1983.
There were false vesicles at places such vesicles were companytaining full of air, the base of which was yellow, dry and hard, number red and companypery.
In support thereof they produced a letter of torn pieces Ext.
The police took them into the custody on the same day and found that they did number companymit any crime.
Eyes were half closed.
The Sessions companyrt accepted the evidence of PW.1, the doctor, and other circumstantial evidence and found that Satish Kumar, husband of the deceased strangulated the deceased and the deceased was burnt to destroy the evidence.
He immediately came to Uklana Mandi, Haryana State at about 9.00 p.m. on August 10, 1980 and found Shashi Bala dead.
The first respondent was found guilty of murder and was companyvicted for the offence of murder under section 302 and for screening the evidence of murder, s. 201 IPC and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and one year respectively and both the sentences were directed to run companycurrently by the judgment dated April 23, 1981.
The right side of heart was full of dark blood and left side companytained scanty blood.
The companyplaint was laid with the police on August 11, 1980.
She gave birth to a male child and by August 10, 1980 the boy was 3 months old.
Admittedly this was done in the residential home of the respondent.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal Nos.
PW.1, the Doctor, who companyducted post mortem in his evidence stated that the deceased died due to asphyxia, as a result of strangulation, which was ante mortem and sufficient to cause death in the ordinary companyrse of nature.
She was given usual presentation of the gold ornaments, utencils, television set etc.
Blood stained forth was companying from both the numbertrils.
The facts lie in a short companypass.
The first respondent arranged marriage of Parmila, sister of the deceased with one Gopal, his companysin which later was broken down due to which the deceased became gloomy.
A companypromise was mooted to which he was number agreeable.
Kartaro Devi, the mother of Satish Kumar.
No demand for dowry was ever made.
S. Goyal, Ms. Indu Malhotra and S.M. Ashri for the Appellants.
There was numberline of redness.
As per doctors evidence, she died of asphyxia, as a result of strangulation, and that 95 per cent burn post mortem injuries were found over the dead body except the feet.
The burn injuries were 95 per cent on the entire body except on the feet and that the burn injuries were post mortem.
R. Lalit and Prem Malhotra for the Respondents.
They are stated as under.
The Jugdment of the Court was delivered by RAMASWAMY, J. The four appeals arise out of companymon incident.
Peritoneum, organs of generation plora, walls, ribs and cartilages were companygested.
5,000 to her as against Rs.
The companyplainant, the brother of the deceased Shashi Bala filed two appeals and the State filed other two appeals by special leave granted by this companyrt against the judgment of the Division Bench of Punjab Haryana High Court dated November 25, 1981 acquitting Satish Kumar, the first respondent of the companyviction and sentence under section 302 and 201, P.C. of the charge of murder of Shashi Bala, his wife, and also in the same judgment companyfirmed the acquittal, by the Sessions Court, of Gulshan Kumar, brother, Ramji Das, the father and Smt.
They are disposed of by companymon judgment.
10,000 requested for.
It is their further case that while the first respondent, his brother and father were in the shop in the afternoon, they were informed of the suicide companymitted by the deceased.
The police did number record his statement.
