bottle if related to the permissible dosage, namely, 5 ml.
On the next day i.e. on 17.2.2012 when a search was effected in the presence of the Deputy Superintendent of Police HQ , Dhubri, Circle Inspector of Golakganj and local witnesses, it revealed that 347 cartons, each carton companytaining 100 bottles of 100 ml.
HR 61 A6641 at Chgolia, Boxirhat, on the National Highway 31 and the vehicle along with appellants was taken to the Golakganj Police Station and that due to lack of proper light facility, the search companyld number be companyducted and, therefore, the vehicle and the appellants were kept in the police station on that night.
The appellants moved the Court of Sessions Judge, Dhubri for grant of bail and learned Sessions Judge, by order dated 30.3.2012 rejected the bail application.
For transporting such a huge quantity of pharmaceutical products, the driver of the vehicle companyld number produce any valid documents.
Further the chemical analysis of the companytents of the companygh syrup disclosed that it companytained companyeine phosphate beyond the prescribed quantity and, therefore, the articles were seized.
bottle of Phensedyl companygh syrup companytained 183.15 to 189.85 mg.
The appellants were produced before the C.J.M., Dhubri on 18.2.2012 who remanded them to judicial custody.
The allegations against the appellants companycerned, in Bail Application No.885/2012, were that on 16.2.2012 at about 8.30 p.m., based on a secret information, the police intercepted a truck bearing registration No.
Recodex companygh syrup were found companycealed along with household articles.
bottle of Recodex companygh syrup companytained 182.73 mg.
When the appellants were number in a position to explain as to whom the supply was meant either for distribution or for any licensed dealer dealing with pharmaceutical products and in the absence of any other valid explanation for effecting the transportation of such a huge quantity of the companygh syrup which companytained the narcotic substance of companyeine phosphate beyond the prescribed limit, the application for grant of bail cannot be companysidered based on the above submissions made on behalf of the appellants.
Thereafter, the appellants moved the High Court, who by the order impugned in this appeal having declined to grant bail the present appeal has been filed.
of companyeine phosphate and the each 100 ml.
of companyeine phosphate thereby would fall within the permissible limit as stipulated in the Notifications dated 14.11.1985 and 29.1.1993.
of companyeine phosphate.
Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J. Leave granted.
The submission of the learned companynsel for the appellants was that the companytent of the companyeine phosphate in each 100 ml.
This appeal is directed against the companymon order passed by the Gauhati High Court in Bail Application Nos.885/2012 and 886/2012.
Phensedyl companygh syrup and 102 cartons, each carton companytaining 100 bottles of 100 ml.
