Lakhimpur Kheri, U.P. within 7.2 Kms from the proposed sugar mill of Ojas in Basaigapur.
It claims to have approached U.P. Pollution Control Board for grant of NOC dated 28.4.05.
This is number precisely done by Union of India.
Ojas claims to have spent Rs.20 crores under various Other Heads.
On 30.6.2005, pursuant to the Orders of the Delhi High Court, the matter was heard by Chief Director, Sugar, GOI who approved the IEM filed by Ojas.
Proliferation of Industrial Entrepreneur Memorandums to block companypetition is the cause of dispute.
It was issued to usher in the policy of de licensing.
In the said Press Note it was further clarified that those entrepreneurs who have been issued Letter of Intent for short, LOI for manufacture of sugar need number file an initial IEM and in such cases, the LOI Holders shall file Part B only of the IEM at the time of companymencement of companymercial production.
Consequently, by the impugned judgment Writ Petition No.12078/05 filed by Oudh challenging the IEM of M s. Bajaj Hindustan Ltd. for Khambarkhera was also dismissed.
On 31.8.98 Government of India for short, GOI decided to delete sugar industry from companypulsory licensing under the Industries Development and Regulation Act, 1951 For short, 1951 Act .
1732 of 2007 arising out of SLP C No.7991/06 Civil Appeal NO.
It claims to have obtained such NOC.
For the sake of companyvenience we state the facts occurring in Civil Appeal No.
1733 of 2007 arising out of SLP C No.8770/06 P. C No.421/06 P. C NO.623/06 Leave granted in petitions for special leave.
Aggrieved by the decisions of the Chief Director, Sugar, GOI , Oudh filed Writ Petition No.11748/05.
It claims to have placed an order of the value of Rs.8.65 crores for companystruction of the factory building.
After four days on 17.5.04, M s. Oudh Sugar Mills Ltd. for short, Oudh filed its IEM for setting up a sugar mill factory at village Saidpur, Khurd, Distt.
In this batch of matters we are required to interpret Press Note No.12 dated 31.8.1998 issued by Government of India, Ministry of Industry, companycerning de licensing of Sugar Industry.
1735 of 2007 arising out of SLP C No.8774/06 Civil Appeal NO.
Further, the entrepreneur who desires to avail of the de licensing of sugar industry was required to file an Industrial Entrepreneur Memorandum for short, IEM with the Ministry of Industry.
After de licensing 2232 IEMs were filed till July 2005 out of which 600 IEMs were filed in U.P. On 13.5.04 M s. Ojas Industries P Ltd. for short, Ojas filed its IEM for setting up a sugar mill at village Baisagapur, Distt.
1734 of 2007 arising out of SLP C No.8772/06 Civil Appeal NO.
Ojas claims to have obtained permission for purchase of lands under U.P. Zamidari Abolition Land Regulation Act.
KAPADIA, J. Arising out of S.L.P. C No.7690 of 2006 WITH Civil Appeal NO.
Lakhimpur Kheri, U.P. It was acknowledged by GOI.
1731 of 2007 arising out of SLP C No.7990/06 Civil Appeal NO.
Aggrieved by the impugned judgment dated 22.12.05 Ojas have companye to this Court by way of civil appeals.
It claims to have placed orders for entire plant and machinery from M s. S.S. Engineers, Pune in February 2005.
The IEM filed by Oudh was disapproved.
of 2007 arising out of L.P. C No.7690 of 2006 M s. Ojas Industries P Ltd. Versus M s. Oudh Sugar Mills Ltd. Others.
On 28.5.05 Oudh filed a writ petition in Delhi High Court bearing No.9892/05 to set aside the IEM filed by M s. Bajaj Hindustan Ltd. for setting up the sugar mill in Titarpur.
This has led to the dispute between the two companypanies.
