Being aggrieved thereby, the present appeals are preferred by the appellant.
4 is companycerned, it was held that the prosecution has failed to prove the case against her for both the offences and she was accordingly acquitted of the offence charged.
959SB of 2000.
Shri Rajeshwar Singh Thakur, learned companynsel for the appellant, submitted that the companyviction as recorded by the learned trial companyrt and companyfirmed by the High Court under Section 498A of the IPC is number tenable.
All the four accused, including the appellant herein accused No.3 , who is husband of the deceased, were charged and tried by the learned trial Court for the offence punishable under Section Signature Not Verified 304B and Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 Digitally signed by SATISH KUMAR YADAV Date 2019.11.26 hereinafter referred to as IPC .
50,000/, one refrigerator and one almirah was given to the accused persons by the parents of the deceased on their demand and this was over and above dowry given at the time of the marriage.
The other accused were the 161503 IST Reason father accused No.1 , the mother accused No.2 and the sister inlaw wife of brother accused No.4 of the appellant.
544 DBA of 2001 and Criminal Appeal No.
R. GAVAI, J. These appeals by special leave challenge the judgment and order dated 20.2.2009 passed by the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Criminal Appeal No.
