K Mehta, P. N. Puri, E. M. Sardul Anam, M. K Dua and K M. Jain for the Petitioner.
M. Tarkunde and S. K Jain for Respondents Nos.
The expert Member was either Dr. I. C. Saxena, or Shri Kagzi or Shri Jallan who sat by rotation.
7, 8, 15, 25 28, 29, 31, 33, 38, 41.
K Parasaran Sol.
Gen. and Badri Das Sharma for Respondent No.
He has filed the present writ petition under Art.
L. Jain and Badri Das Sharma for Respondent No.
ORlGlNAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.
32 of the Constitution questioning the selection.
The viva voce examination was companyducted by a Board companysisting of Honble Mr. Justice P. D. Kudal, Judge, Rajasthan High Court, Shri Hari Datt Gupta, Chairman, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Adaviappa, Member, Rajasthan Public Service Commission and an expert.
3 to 41 were declared selected for appointment.
Badri Das Sharma for Respondent No.
The companypetitive examination companysisted of a written examination with two papers in law carrying 100 marks each and two papers, one in Hindi and the other in English, each carrying SO marks and a viva voce examination carrying 100 marks.
Under Art.
Shri Mehta learned companynsel for the petitioner raised two principal companytentions before us.
The last of the candidates belonging to the general category who was selected for appointment obtained a total of 190 marks in the examination, 135 in written examination and 55 in the viva voce.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by CHINNAPPA REDDY, J. What is the ideal mode of selection to a Public Service, by written examination, by oral test viva voce , or by a companybination of both ?
32 of the Constitution of India.
2701 of 1981.
The petitioner who obtained a total of 189 marks, 159 in the written test and 30 in the viva voce was number selected for appointment.
Out of the 39 candidates who were selected for appointment, one belonged to the scheduled castes and the rest belonged to the general category.
