Thereafter on 17.07.2001 27.05.2002, the respondent made two representations to the Department companytending that his seniority may be companynted from the year 1995 96 with all the companysequential benefits as the vacancies fell vacant in that year.
Further on 12.06.2002, the respondent made another representation stating that his earlier two representations were number decided upon and that he should be promoted with effect from the date of occurrence of vacancy.
The respondent filed Writ petition No.369/2004 on 21.11.2004 praying the High Court to issue a writ of Mandamus to promote him with effect from 1995 96 with all companysequential benefits.
The appellants filed their companynter affidavit stating the rejection of the claim of the respondent in the High Court on 23.03.2005.
The said representations of the respondent had been decided by the appellant by a well reasoned and speaking order vide its office memo dated 01.10.2002.
However, the respondent in his writ petition has suppressed the fact that the Government had denied the claim the respondent had made by way of representations dated 17.07.2001, 27.05.2002 and 12.06.2002.
It is against this order of the High Court the appellants are before this Court by way of special leave.
On 01.10.2002, the Government of Uttaranchal issued Office Memorandum companyveying its decision of rejecting the claim made by the respondent.
Mrida Chemist at Haldwani, Nainital.
Sd Kesav Desh Raju Secretary The representations of the respondent dated 17.07.2001 and 27.05.2002 were received by the office of respondent No.1.
Arising out of SLP C No.
12966/2005 Dr. AR.Lakshmanan, J Leave granted.
The brief facts of the present matter are enumerated below.
On 04.04.2001, the U.P Government Agriculture Department issued an order directing that those employees who were already members of the Hill Sub Cadre and posted at Uttaranchal have been finally allocated to Uttaranchal Government in which the name of the respondent was shown at serial No.30.
