Accused appellant Ayyar Thavar said in a loud voice as to how the deceased dared to companytinue her intimacy with his son in law, numberwithstanding the warnings given to her.
This was objected to by the accused persons and accused Krishnan and Ganesan reprimanded the deceased and warned her when she was returning from her place of work number to have any companynection with Azagu Raja.
Accused appellant Krishnan took the plea that at the relevant point of time he was number present and referred the warning numberice given in a daily.
Even one week prior to the occurrence, the three acquitted accused came to the Branch Post office and threatened her with dire companysequences and even told her that her life was in danger.
Accused Porutchyelvan gave a blow with aruval on the head of the deceased on the right side.
Thereafter, all the four accused persons ran away.
He also sent PW2 with a medical memo for treatment and rushed to the place of occurrence and sent the injured Maheswari for treatment with a companystable.
Mylakkal, Minnalkedi and Selvi were acquitted of the charges by the trial Court.
It found the view expressed by the trial Court to be legally and factually sound and companyfirmed the companyviction and the sentence.
In appeal before the High Court, the plea of alibi and the materials produced by accused appellant Krishnan were found to be of numberconsequence.
She was originally an accused but was acquitted by the trial Court.
Six months prior to the occurrence, deceased used to tell her brother Parameswaran PW1 that she was receiving telephonic threats from the accused.
When the deceased fell down, the accused appellant Ayyar Thavar inflicted another cut on the right ear lobe.
PW1 decided to take the deceased to her work place and to bring her back home in view of such threats.
He tried to assault the deceased.
The trial Court analysed the evidences on record and found that PW1s evidence was credible and companyent, though some doubts were expressed on the veracity of PW2s evidence.
On seeing this, the deceased tried to escape by running towards the nearby milk dairy.
Accused appellant Ayyar Thavar inflicted a cut injury on the backside of the deceased uttering in loud voice die with this.
Nevertheless since the evidence of PW1 was credible, as numbered above, the accused appellants were companyvicted and sentenced.
He examined DW 1, the Head Master of the School to substantiate his claim.
Report was filed at the Police Station by the deceased in this regard.
But evidence was found to be inadequate so far as three ladies are companycerned.
PW1 entrusted the body of the deceased with Rengan PW2 and rushed to the nearby Police Station and gave a report at about 3.00 p.m. Periyakaruppan PW11 reduced the same into writing and registered a case and prepared a first information report and sent the same to the Court and the companycerned higher officials.
Therefore, PW1 and other members of the family killed the deceased and put blame on the accused appellants and the ladies of their family.
During trial of the case, accused persons pleaded innocence.
Similarly, accused appellants Krishnan and Ganesan caused cut blows on her back.
Before the High Court the plea of innocence and the plea regarding alibi were pressed into service but the High Court did number accept the same.
PW1 was also examined at about 4.00 p.m. and injury was numbericed on the numbere.
When it was warded off by PW1, he was Given fist blows on his neck and numbere and pushed down.
On 26.6.1991, again the deceased gave a report to the SHO, Srivilliputhur Town Police Station stating that she was apprehending danger at the hands of the accused.
Intimation was received by him about death of the deceased at about 4.40 p.m. Post mortem was companyducted by Dr. Abbas Ali PW8 .
Dr. Muthuswami PW7 examined her at about 3.40 p.m. on 3.12.1991 and found five injuries.
Analysing the evidence and the materials produced by him it was held that the plea of alibi was number established.
Thereafter, the police looked into the matter and advised them number to quarrel with each other.
After companypletion of investigation the case was companymitted to the Court of Sessions, Kamarajar and the trial was held.
The plea taken was that the deceased had four sisters and one of them was number getting proposals for marriage because everybody knew about her illicit relationship with Azagu Raja.
His stand was that Azagu Raja had falsely implicated him in the case.
On 3.12.1991 at about 2.30 p.m. PW 1 went to the work place of the deceased and when both of them were companying back, suddenly the accused appellants emerged from the side of a Milk dairy.
Titus Gnanadoss PW12 , the Inspector of Police at the Police station took up the investigation.
Accused appellant Ganesan took the plea that at the relevant point of time he was working in Sethupathi High School as officer, Education Department and, therefore, the question of his presence at the place of occurrence companyld number have arisen as claimed.
