In the suit filed for eviction of the appellant from suit premises under the provisions of Section 17 2 2A of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act 1956 hereinafter referred to as Act, the application for amendment has been rejected by the trial companyrt and the order has been upheld by the High Court of Calcutta in revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The trial companyrt by the impugned order dated 10.4.2001 rejected the application for proposing the above amendment on the ground that an attempt is being made to withdraw the admission made in the original application regarding status of Alamohan Dass as the licensee of the suit premises.
150 in favour of licensor on a companydition that the answering defendant, her husband and her son would be given a fresh license for earmarked portion of Dag No.
148 and was never recorded as permissive owner in record of rights in respect of that suit property.
The appellant seeks to resist the eviction suit on he ground that there exists numberrelationship of landlord and tenant between the parties.
150 and he was number in actual possession of Dag No.
The parties represented in the case are finally heard on merits of the appeal.
