The appeal and subsequent revision by the accused were dismissed by the Sessions Judge, Gokak, and by the High Court.
P.C. ought to have been extended to the appellants.
The companyplainant PW1 and Accused No.1 are companysins.
Accused 3 is the wife of accused No.1 and accused No.4 is the wife of accused No.2.
Accused 2 is the son of accused No.1.
Having appreciated the evidence of the injured eye witnesses and the documentary evidence, the trial companyrt held that the accused guilty and, companysequently, companyvicted and sentenced them.
The appellants accused 1 to 4 were companyvicted by JMFC, Raibag, for offences punishable under section 324 read with section 34 IPC, and under Section 504 read with Section 34 IPC and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three months and one month respectively, to run companycurrently.
V.RAVEENDRAN, J. Leave granted.
Heard the learned companynsel.
