HILTRON was also numberinated as the Information Technology and Communication service provider for various Departments, Semi Government Departments and Institutions, etc.
HILTRON in turn numberinated the appellant herein for execution of the project work.
Though, there are serious disputes on those aspects as to whether the writ petitioners were qualified or number, ultimately what the Division Bench did is only to set aside the arrangement between the Transport Commissioner and the HILTRON.
HILTRON and Transport Commissioner of Uttarakhand entered into an MOU with regard to the project of Smart Card based driving licence and vehicle registration certificate.
That MOU with HILTRON was challenged by the respondent No.1 herein petitioner before the High Court .
That writ petition was filed by respondent No.1 herein, challenging the award of project of Smart Card based driving licence and vehicle registration certificate.
done through HILTRON with the assistance of the appellant herein.
KURIAN, J. Leave granted.
The appellant herein was the respondent No.4 in Writ Petition No.1087/2007 on the file of the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital.
The above companyclusion of the learned Single Judge was based on the finding that the writ petitioners were number companypetitors qualified for execution of the project and hence the intra companyrt before the Division Bench.
