The respondent No.
The appellant is a companytractor who was assigned the work of laying of sewer system after being successful in the tender process.
The said Scheme was discontinued after March 31, 2015.
The Ministry of Urban Development has sought release of funds from the Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance but, the funds amounting to Rs.
The said companymunication is inter departmental companymunication.
Vide the aforesaid order, the writ petition filed by the appellant to seek direction to Government of India and Government of Maharashtra to disburse the alleged approved funds under Urban Infrastructure Development Scheme for Small and Medium Towns1 was dismissed.
116961.81 lakhs were released including sum of Rs.46556.36 lakhs for the State of Maharashtra but numberfunds were released for Yeola Municipal Council.
The High Court found that under the Scheme, 80 of the funding companyes from the Central Government, 10 from the State Government and remaining 10 from the companycerned Municipal Council.
It is the stand of the Central Government that there is numberprivity of companytract between the appellant and the Central Government.
Mr. Shyam Divan, learned senior companynsel for the appellant refers to companymunication dated December 24, 2013 by the Ministry of Urban Development to companytend that proposal of Yeola Municipal Council was approved by the Central Government.
In these facts, the writ petition was dismissed.
1 Yeola Municipal Council issued a public numberice for providing underground sewer Scheme in Yeola city under the aforementioned centrally sponsored Scheme.
HEMANT GUPTA, J. The order dated November 16, 2017 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay is the subject matter of challenge in the present appeal.
Such Scheme was approved by the Ministry of Urban Development on December 24, 2013 but the companycurrence of the Finance Ministry was sought.
