The Union of India pointed out certain difficulties in giving effect to the order of this Court of April, 1987 by filing a review petition and then a clarification applica tion but these have been dismissed.
WITH Writ Petition C Nos.
Their grievance is that dispite their long service in the Department they were number regula rised with reference to their original dates of appointment.
1.1.1973 or the date of their respec tive original appointments whichever is later.
The proposals of the appellants have been set down in an annexure to an affidavit filed by Dr. PPC Rawani and dated 16th July, 1991.
From the Judgment and Order dated 3.4.1984 of the Delhi High Court in W.P. No.
3,5,6 and 7 of 1990 In Civil Appeal No.
CIVIL APPELLATE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION C.M.P. No.8076 of 1988 and I.A. Nos.
S. Vaidyanathan, Ms. Smitha Singh, K.A.Raja, A.K. Srivastava, Sushma Suri, C.V.S. Rao, Ms. C.K. Sucharita and Vimal Dave for the appearing parties.
Briefly, the appellants were originally appointed after interview by selection companymittees but only as adhoc appoint ees in the above service.
They were appointed on various dates between 1968 and 1977.
1144 of 1983.
Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India .
2620 59 of 1985.
3519 of 1984.
