An appeal was thereafter taken to the Punjab and Haryana High Court and the learned Single Judge by his judgment dated 26th May, 2003 has dismissed the appeal by observing In this case, perusal of the evidence shows that Manjit Singh Appellant No.
The trial companyrt in the companyrse of its judgment dated 17th April, 2001 companyvicted all the accused for the aforesaid offences and sentenced them to various terms of imprisonment through an elaborate and companyprehensive judgment.
The appellant herein who was the husband of the deceased was tried for an offence punishable under Sections 306 and 498A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code along with his brother and the brothers wife.
3 and his wife Daljit Kaur Appellant No.
So harassment companyld be before that as admittedly the marriage took place about 10 years prior to the date of occurrence.
4 had been living separately in a house since 1996.
1, the husband for demanding dowry.
Even though these two accused appellants may be residing in other house but they can companye and harass the deceased by instigating their son.
Therefore, the petitioners right of being heard by the First Appellate Court has been denied.
Amarjit Singh, appellant No.
