number 1222/69 .
the appellant made a claim about the property in dispute and the same is pending before the tribunal.
number.
354 1251/69 .
the petition was resisted by the state of punjab and the shiromani gurudwara parbandhak companymittee sgpc .
from the judgment and order dated the 18th march/25th july 1968 of the punjab haryana high companyrt in civil writ number.514 of 1966 1935 of 1962 and 2310 of 1965 respectively.
or realising that their personal interests lay in their seeking the protection of the s.g.p.c.
in reply to a numberice issued to him lachhman dass appellant in civil appeal number 1251 of 1969 filed petition under section 5 of the act claiming rights and in terest in the above mentioned property.
number 233 of the first schedule to the act as well as a division bench consisting of broadway and harrison jj.
number 353/69 and o. p. sharma for respondents number.
naunit lal harbhajan singh kathuria and lalit kohli for the appellant in c.a.
these facts in my opinion were sufficient to clothe the appellant with a right to me the petition before the high court.
number 1251/69 charan singh and harbans singhfor respondent number 3 in all the appeals .
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeals number.354 1222 and 1251/69.
had taken control of many of the gurdwaras from the mahants who were either religious minded 1 63 i.a.
by then the s.g.p.c.
by a separate a numberification a companysolidated list of rights title and interest claimed to belong to the gurdwara was also published.
jaganmohan reddy j. civil appeals number.
he prayed that a number of provisions of the act might be declared to be violative of the appellants rights under the companystitution.
civil writ petition number 2310 of 1965 was also disposed of by a division bench of that high companyrt.
the application of the appellant was rejected by the tribunal on the ground that it was number germane to the inquiry.
354 and 1222/69 and respondents number.
after a list of properties attached to the gurdwara was forwarded a declaration was issued under section 3 2 of the act on may 24 1960 that the above mentioned gurdwara was a sikh gurdwara.
the appellant thereupon filed a writ petition in the high companyrt under article 226 of the companystitution on the allegation that he was an udasi faqir and that the shrine in question was an udasi insti tution and number a sikh gurdwara.
1 and ss.
during the pendency of the proceedings before the tribunal the appellant wanted to agitate the question that the property in dispute was an udasi institution and number a sikh gurdwara.
1 4 in c.as number 1251/69 .
the petition was ultimately decided by a full bench and the companytentions of the petitioner were rejected by the majority.
k. daphtary in c.a.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by jaganmohan reddy j. khanna j. gave a separate opinion.
tarkunde in c. number 1251/69 m. b. bal r. d. mahant n. s. das behl and p. a. palli for the appellants in c.as.
of lahore high companyrt in the case of mahant davinder singh v. shromani gurdwara parbandhak companymittee anr.
5 7 and 8 of the sikh gurdwaras act 1925 which were challenged were held to be valid.
180 201.
514 of 1966 and 1935 of 1962 respectively in which by majority the provisions of s. 3 read with sch.
the shriomani gurdwara parbandhak companymittee hereinafter referred to as the s.g.p.c.
number 354/69 y.m.j.
against that judgment civil appeal number 1222 of 1969 is by certificate.
354 and 1251 of 1969 are by certificate against the judgment of the full bench of the punjab haryana high companyrt in civil writ petition number.
the appellants petition was forwarded to the sikh gurdwara tribunal.
v. patel in c.a.
this board continued to function even after the amending act came into force.
1 2 in c. as.
s. desai k. k. chawla in c.a.
following the full bench judgment in the above two civil writ petitions.
