His stand in the essence was that he was in the services of the Public Health Engineering Department and was working at Jabalpur Sub Division since 17.11.1991 as a Helper.
Evidence was led by the parties.
The Labour Court came to a positive finding that the applicant workman had number been appointed to any permanent and vacant post by an appointment order and he was number as such entitled to get benefits of difference in wages, as he was a daily wager.
The respondent hereinafter referred to as the workman filed a petition under Section 31 3 read with Section 61 of the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 in short, the M.P. Act .
The claim was resisted by the State and its functionaries on the ground that the respondent was number working in respect of a permanent post and his services cannot, therefore, be regularized.
But it directed that from the date of order, he was entitled to get the regular wage rate.
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Challenge in this appeal is to a judgment of the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur dismissing the writ petition filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh and its functionaries thereby putting its seal of approval on the orders of the Labour Court, Jabalpur in short, the Labour Court and the Industrial Court, Jabalpur Bench in short, the Industrial Court .
He prayed for regularization of his services on the ground that he had rendered services for more than six months in a permanent vacant post and, therefore, entitled to be classified as a permanent employee and was also entitled to the difference of salary and companysequential benefits.
