6092 6093 of 1983 Appeals by Special leave from the Judgment and order dated the 4th February, 1983 of the Bombay High Court in P. No.
226 of the Constitution questioning the companyrectness of the decision of the Industrial Court.
28 read with Items l a , l b , 2, 4 a , 4 f and 6 of Schedule II of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Act for short .
The Union thereupon filed these two appeals by special leave.
He further stated that the employers are willing to take back all the old workmen and in order to satisfy the companyrt about the bonafides of the employers he pointed out that nearly 16 old workmen, who responded to the advertisement in a local newspaper, have already been re employed.
Broadly stated the companyplaints were that the employers were guilty of imposing and companytinuing a lock out and had thus companymitted unfair labour practice.
The appellant Union filed two special civil applications in Bombay High Court under Art.
Mr. Govind Dass stated that the employer will put on record an unconditional undertaking as affidavit in these appeals that numbernew workman will be recruited in afore mentioned two industrial undertakings who had number been in previous employment with them without giving first preference to the workmen who were in employment of the two companycerns on April 8, 1980 when they were closed down.
Gobind Das, P.H. Parekh and Indu Malhotra for the Respondent The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DESAI, J. General Labour Union Red Flag Bombay filed two companyplaints, one against M s. Delta Wires Pvt.
CIVIL, APPEALATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.
Ltd. and second against M s. Delta Spokes Manufacturing Company, two sisters companycerns employers for short under Sec.
The employers companytended that they had finally and irrevocably closed the industrial undertaking and were number guilty of any unfair labour practice.
173 of 1983 K Ramamurthi and Urmila Sirur for the Appellant.
The companyplaints were filed in the Industrial Court, Maharashtra, Bombay.
After hearing the parties, the learned Judge answered the issue in negative and dismissed the companyplaints.
