On the certificates being granted, two appeals were filed in this Court.
The State applied for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court, and so did the decree holder.
99,965 3 6, praying for attachment of the amount of companypensation and rehabili tation grant which would be paid to the judgment debtor on account of resumption of his jagir.
The respondent did number appear.
Appeal from the judgment and order dated February 18, 1959 of the Rajasthan High Court in Civil Misc.
K. Kapur and B. R. G. K. Achar, for the appellant.
The latter property was sold in execution and Rs.
On December 3, 1957, the decree holder filed a petition under Art.
This case was registered as Execution Case No.
The mortgage money was advanced under three mortgages, and the mortgaged properties companysisted of 2 Jagirs and some number jagir immovable property.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The High Court transferred the case to its file, and thereafter issued numberice to the State of Rajasthan, as the companystitutionality of the said Act had been challenged.
507 of 1961.
February 26, 1964.
12 of 1957, pending in the Court of the District Judge, Jodhpur, be withdrawn from that Court to the Rajasthan High Court.
10 of 1959.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SIKRI J. This is an appeal directed against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court, which granted a certificate under Art.
1,14,581 14 6, with future interest at 6 per cent per annum, against one Rao Raja Inder Singh hereinafter referred to as the judgment debtor .
Case No.
On December 14, 1956, the decree holder filed an execution petition in the Court of the District Judge, Jodhpur, for Rs.
133 1 c .
One Mukanchand, respondent No.
33,750/ paid to the decree holder in partial satisfaction of the decree.
1 in this appeal hereinafter referred to as the decree holder obtained a mortgage decree on February 12, 1954, for Rs.
