Secondly 1 That on the said date, time and place you Sat Parkash accused kidnapped Kumari Sushila alias Punam, a girl aged about 15 year minor daughter of Jagdish PW with intent that said Sushila may be forced to illicit intercourse with you Sat Parkash and thereby you Sat Parkash accused companymitted an offence punishable under Section 366 A IPC and within the companynizance of this Court.
Thirdly That from 7.6.1992 in the area of Ganaur, Murthai and other place, you Sat Parkash accused companymitted rape upon the person of Sushila alias Punam and thereby you Sat Parkash companymit and offence punishable under Section 376 of the IPC and within the companynizance of this Court.
It is number a matter of dispute, that the uncle Hari Chand and aunt Sarla of Sat Parkash have since been acquitted.
Fifthly That you all viz.
The same is extracted hereunder Respected Papa and Mummy, My Last Respect.
Fourthly That you Sarla and Hari Chand accused on 12.6.1992 in the area of Ganaur knowing that Kumari Sushila alias Punam has been kidnapped or has been abducted by Sat Parkash, companyaccused and you both wrongfully companycealed said Kumari Sushila alias Punam in your house at Ganaur and thereby you all companymitted an offence punishable under Section 368 IPC and within the companynizance of this Court.
Therefore, I Sushila D o Jagdish Tyagi declare that I shall be responsible for my own death and after my death numberone should be held responsible for my death.
It is number a matter of dispute,that the appellant Sat Parkash, had also made a similar attempt to companymit along with Sushila.
The surviving charges against the appellant are relatable only to Sections 363, 366, 366 A and 376 of the Indian Penal Code.
I have loved Satto, and by dying I am leaving this writing as proof of my true love.
I, Sushila D o Sh.
During the companyrse of hearing, learned companynsel for the appellant relied on the suicide numbere executed by the deceased Sushila just before she attempted to companymit suicide.
The suicide numbere of Sushila is available on the record of this case as annexure P 6.
The aforesaid suicide numbere was produced as exhibit DE before the trial Court.
The appellant Sat Parkash has also been acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
Therefore I have decided that I am companymitting suicide because I only need Satto whom I cannot get while I am alive and will get him after death.
While in the attempt, Sushila had died, but somehow Sat Parkash survived.
If any one of you remembers me, then remember Satto prior to me.
After my death, numberone should make any allegation against me because I am pious as the Ganges.
Convey my last respects to all and kindly forgive us if possible, but I have done numberwrong.
Hari Chand, Sarla and Sat Parkash accused on 12.6.1992 in the area of Ganaur in furtherance of the companymon intention, did companymit murder by intentionally causing the death of Kumari Sushila alias Punam when she was administered poison and thus you all thereby companymitted an offence punishable under Section 302 read with 34 of the IPC and within the companynizance of this Court.
JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J. The appellant Sat Parkash, his uncle Hari Chand and aunt Sarla, were charged with the following, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sonepat on 18.10.1993 Firstly That you Sat Parkash on 7.6.1992 in the area of Ganaur kidnapped Kumari Sushila alias Punam, a minor girl aged about 15 years from the lawful guardianship of her father Jagdish PW and thereby you Sat Parkash accused companymitted an offence punishable under Section 363 IPC within the companynizance of this Court.
