The evidence against Sattar, Rohan and Alif was identical.
Rohan and Alif were acquitted Sattar alone was companyvicted for causing simple hurt to Andhi.
The sentence imposed on such of the appellants as were companyvicted for more than one offence were ordered to run companycurrently.
12 persons including the appellants were tried and companyvicted for various offences by the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya.
The incident with which we are companycerned in these cases, as found by the High Court companymenced in companynection with a dispute regarding taking water from Sarfara Ahar.
In these appeals the appellants challenge their companyviction.
In appeal all except the appellants Manzoor, Jangloo, Ekramul, Enamul and Sattar were acquitted.
The further finding of the High Court is that the appellants party is number proved to have gone to the scene of occurrence with the companymon object of assaulting the prosecution party.
S. Hegde, J. These appeals by special leave are directed against the decision of the High Court of judicature at Patna in Cr.
178/65 on its fils.
