On getting this information, she went along with her husband to the appellants house but numbere of them was found.
Charges were framed against the appellants under Sections 304 B and 498 AA of IPC.
She told them that the appellants had given beating to Raj Dulari during the day and when she tried to intervene, she was detained in the locked room.
Then the dead body of Raj Dulari was found lying near a well outside the house.
The sister of the deceased, by name Simla was married to the first appellants brother on the same day of the marriage of the deceased.
The muklawa ceremony of younger sister took place about one and a half month prior to the occurrence.
They found that their second daughter, Bimla was locked up in a room on the first floor.
The Court of Session companysidered the entire evidence and came to the companyclusion that the charges were proved.
The case of the prosecution is that on 7th April 1988, three persons came to the house of PW 7 and told that Raj Dulari, the deceased was having severe pain in the stomach and that they should go to see her.
The case of the prosecution is that the appellants had demanded dowry ever since the marriage and demanding articles like T. V., sofa set and other articles of furnitures etc.
The deceased was married to the first appellant on June 20, 1984.
The appellants are companyvicted under Sections 304 B and 498 A of IPC.
They found that her daughter, Raj Duiari was also number in the house.
This appeal is against the judgment of the High Court companyfirming that of the Sessions Court.
The first appellant is the husband and the second appellant is the mother in law of the deceased, Raj Dulari.
Whenever the deceased visited her parents she used to tell her relations that the appellants were ill treating and harassing her on demand of dowry.
