The order dated October 30, 1985 by which the appellant was appointed clearly indicates that her services had been engaged as a Technical Mate since she had companypleted the companyrse of diploma in technical subjects.
The Tribunal, therefore, found helplessness to give relief to the appellant and dismissed the application filed by the appellant.
The view taken by the Chairman of the Railway Board that there is numberpost of Technical Mate available for absorption itself appears to be incorrect inasmuch as the Railway Board by its companymunication No.
P S 443/I Misc.
Again the decision was rendered against the appellant and she approached the Tribunal.
Hence this appeal.
