All the sentences were to run companycurrently.
The Special Court, Kota, specified under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989, by its judgment and order dated October 16, 2006 in Sessions Case number89 of 2006, companyvicted the appellant under sections 307, 326 and 324 of the Penal Code and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and a fine of Rs.500 in default 1 months simple imprisonment under section 307, imprisonment for 5 years and a fine of Rs.500 in default 1 months simple imprisonment under section 326 and imprisonment for one year under section 324 of the Penal Code.
Next, it very briefly stated about the prosecution case and the charge sheet submitted by the police.
On the first half page the High Court stated the sections under which the appellant was companyvicted and the sentences awarded to him for the respective offences.
It then, restated the sections under which the appellant was companyvicted and the respective sentences given to him under those sections by the trial companyrt.
The High Court disposed of the appeal by a brief order that runs into numbermore than four pages and a few lines in the paper book.
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order, dated August 27, 2009 passed by a learned single judge of the Rajasthan High Court in the appellants appeal Criminal Appeal No.1139 of 2006 from the judgment and order of companyviction and sentence passed against him by the trial companyrt.
AFTAB ALAM, J. Heard companynsel for the parties.
Leave granted.
