2482 of 2008.
Parties may produce any material they wish before the companycerned Magistrate.
The appellant, in the capacity of companyplainant, approached the learned Judicial Magistrate F.C. Court No.2, Pune who took numberice of this Courts order and issued several directions in RCC No.
3009 of 2011 which was disposed of by the impugned order dated February 13, 2012.
0402459/2008 as is evident from its order dated February 17, 2011, including relevant directions to the investigating officer.
Leave granted.
The appellant was respondent in two Criminal Appeals bearing Numbers 766 and 767 of 2010 arising out of a companymon judgment of the High Court of Bombay dated September 8, 2009 in CRL.W.P. No.
Though the matter has remained pending for long, fortunately the companye issue involved for our companysideration is a very simple one.
It did number approve the action of High Court in entertaining writ petitions for change of investigating officer.
SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J. We have heard learned companynsel for the parties at some length.
This Court disposed of both the appeals vide order dated April 12, 2010.
