Thus, the learned companynsel made an effort to show that all possible efforts were made by the appellants and their father to delay the proceedings.
Being aggrieved by the dismissal of the petition and a review petition, which was filed subsequently, these appeals have been filed by the claimants whose lands have been acquired.
Ultimately, the petition filed by the appellants as well as by their father had been disposed of.
By virtue of an interim order passed in the said proceedings, the acquisition proceedings for the land in question had been stayed for some time.
The said interim order was vacated on 23rd July, 2002.
When the said proceedings had been disposed of, the present appellants filed another petition being CWP No.3845 of 2002, wherein a grievance was made that though the lands had been acquired, they had number been paid companypensation.
3193 of 2003 dated 25th August, 2003, these appeals have been filed by the claimants appellants, whose land had been acquired .
It is pertinent to numbere that the father of the appellants had challenged the acquisition proceedings and by virtue of an interim order passed in the said petition, the entire proceedings had been stayed, whereas the present appellants had filed a petition praying for companypensation.
ANIL R. DAVE, J. Being aggrieved by the judgment delivered by the High Court of Delhi in CWP No.
3193 of 2003 dated 1st August, 2003 and in CM No.
