We heard Mr. S. C. Majumdar, learned Counsel for the appellant and Mr. Shankar Ghosh, learned Counsel for respondents.
The trial companyrt has certified the finding and the finding is against the tenant appellant.
The companytention raised by the appellant tenant was that there was implied surrender of the tenancy and a fresh lease had companye into existence and therfore, the tenant appellant will be entitled to the protection of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act.
Persuant to this direction, the case was remitted to the trial companyrt where the parties were heard afresh.
The trial companyrt records a finding that there was neither implied surrender number any fresh lease has companye into existence between the parties.
On November 3, 1980 after hearing the parties this Court by its order remitted the case to the Trial Court to record a fresh finding on issue No.
1 after giving further opportunity to the parties to lead evidence and address arguments.
