Thereupon the appellants applied for a certificate under Article 133 of the Constitution which was granted to them.
aforesaid decision of the Government to apply a cut of l0 in his pension and gratuity.
Aggrieved by this companymunication, the respondent filed in the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, being Civil Writ Petition No.
In June 1961, he received a companyy of letter No.
On January, 28, 1962, the respondent submitted representations to the Chief Minister and Governor of Punjab against the aforesaid decision of the Government to apply 10 cut in his pension and death cum retirenment gratuity but the same proved abortive.
From the order dated the 4 4 1967 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in L.P.A. No.
After the establishment of the Board set up to examine and remove the grievances in the matters of promotion and fixation of pension etc.
EDI 4 64 65/22436 dated October 21, 1965, addressed by the Education Commissioner and Secretary to Government, Punjab, Education Department, to the Director of Public Instruction, Punjab, intimating that in supersession of the aforesaid letter dated May 2, 1961 of the Punjab Government, it had been decided to grant to the respondent a superannuation pension and death cum retirement gratuity of Rs.
It was stated in the aforesaid letter that personal file of the respondent had been examined with reference to rule 6.4 of the Punjab Civil Service Rules, Vol.
On November l .
II and Government were satisfied that his service record was number satisfactory and a cut of 10 had accordingly been made in the amount of pension and death cum retirement gratuity admissible to his.
504 of 1954 entitled Shri R. Erry, Retired.
II had number been satisfactory.
Of the Gazetted officers of the Government, the respondent addressed a representation to the said Board on September 14, 1964, against the.
5137 ED I 60/9269 dated May 2, 1961 addressed by the Secretary to Government, Punjab, Education Department to the Director of Public Instruction, Punjab, Chandigarh, companyveying the sanction of the Governor of Punjab to the grant to him i.e. the respondent of superannuation pension and death cun1 retirement gratuity of Rs.
298 of 1966, challenging the aforesaid decision of the Punjab Government which was, as already stated, allowed by Narula, J. r as he then was by his judgment and order dated December 19, 1966, following the Full Bench Judgment of his Court dated October 25,1966,in Civil Writ Petition No.
Superintending Engineer, 45, Cecil Hotel, Simla v. The State of Punjab l .
He proceeded on leave preparatory to retirement on March 18, 1958, on attaining the age of super annuation.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
104 of 1967 which did number meet with success.
417.02 np.
1965, the respondent received a companyy of letter No.
104 of 1967 whereby the judgment and order dated December 19, 1966 of Narula, J. as he then was in Civil Writ Petition No 298 of 1966 was affirmed.
It appears that the respondent joined the Punjab Education A Department Class II Service by direct recruitment as senior lecturer in 1933.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by JASWANT SINGH, J. This appeal by certificate of fitness granted by the Punjab and Haryana High Court is directed against the judgment dated April 4, 1967 of a Division Bench of that Court passed in Letters Patent Appeal No.
1203 of 1968.
P. Sharma, for the appellant.
K. Puri and M. C. Dhingra, for the respondent.
Dissatisfied with this judgment and order, the appellants preferred a Letters Patent Appeal, being L. P. A. No.
He was given the selection grade with effect from February 15, 1956 and in due companyrse rose to the position of Director of Public Instruction cum Secretary to the Government of Punjab, Education Department.
He was promoted to Punjab Education Service Class l on October 1, 1949.
104 of 1967.
