While performing examination and companyparison in the microscope about the characteristics of rifling mark on the said bullet and rifling mark on the bullet that was test fired from the revolver of Sample D, they were found similar.
5,000/ , two years and fine of Rs.
It was found Sample A It is a pant.
One Amratlal PW 2 who is the PSI of CID and had allegedly accompanied the companyplainant sought to support the prosecution case.
The said persons ran away.
He heard thereabout only from the companyplainant.
It suggests that sample of cartridge of Sample E is fired from the revolver of Sample D. Sample F It is one companyper jacketed bullet of 0.38 revolver cartridge.
illegible on right side of loin illegible 1 x cm abrasion illegible superficial Black gas seen on cloth and puncture and baniyan occurs The clothes of the companyplainant as also the revolver with the cartridges were sent for testing to the Forensic Science Laboratory.
It suggests that the revolver of the said Sample D is in working companydition.
The panchnama with regard to clothes was prepared first, thereafter panchnama with regard to revolver was prepared.
In regard to seizure of the article, PW 7 Khengarbhai stated How many panchanamas were prepared by police, that I do number know.
Injury suffered by the companyplainant Vaghela PW 8 as appearing from the medical report, is as under H O Firing has sic done by accused from the service revolver.
It suggests that bullet of Sample F is fired from the revolver of Sample D. Note Two cases of cartridge test fired from Sample D and Bullet is enclosed with parcel D. The test report of blood present on the banyan of Parcel B Sample B will be sent separately on being received from the biology department.
However, he did number have any personal knowledge about the incident.
On being firing from the chamber of the revolver of Sample D by taking two cartridges of 0.38 revolver from the stock of this laboratory, the same has been fired successfully.
The companyplainant examined himself as PW 8.
There was indentation mark on the percussion cap of the said empty case of the cartridge.
The said revolver was empty however it did number open.
I put my signature in 4 to 5.
All the witnesses who were said to be independent witnesses, viz.,
How many cartridges were present inside, I have number seen them.
Three other persons were accompanying him.
Sample E It is empty case of cartridge of K.F. 0.38 revolver.
1696 OF 2007 Arising out of SLP Crl.
The said car was intercepted by the companyplainant PSI Babaji Javanji Vaghela PW 8 and other police officers.
Allegedly, he resisted.
Two bullet holes were, therefore, number possible to be caused, one in the trouser and other in the waist, by one shot of fire.
When I went to police station that time clothes and revolver were lying on table in police station.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
A scuffle ensued, during which allegedly he snatched the service revolver of the companyplainant and fired at him.
The companyplainant Vaghela tried to pull the appellant out of the car.
Force was applied to take him out of the car.
1000/ and three years and fine of Rs.
Prosecution case shortly stated is as under Appellant was a driver of a Tata Spacio Car.
2557 of 2007 B. SINHA, J Leave granted.
They were sitting on the back seat.
Appellant was charged with and companyvicted for companymission of offences under Sections 307 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code as also Section 25 1 a of the Arms Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of five years and fine of Rs.
As soon as first panchnama was companycluded, second panchanama was prepared.
While performing examination and companyparison in the microscope about the characteristics of the indentation mark on the percussion cap of the said cartridge and firing pin mark on the percussion cap of the cartridge that was test fired from the revolver of Sample D, they were found similar.
