On 21.03.1998, the Nagpur University respondent No.2 herein granted approval to the appointment of respondent No.1 as a part time Lecturer.
The High Court further directed the Management to reinstate the respondent No.1 in services but without payment of any back wages to the respondent No.1.
The respondent No.1, felt aggrieved, filed a writ petition being Writ Petition No.
It was, however, dismissed for want of prosecution by order dated 08.07.2010.
N 10 of 1998 and quashed the termination order dated 31.03.1998 issued by appellant No.1 herein by which the services of the respondent No.
The direction was issued to reinstate the respondent No.
1 had been terminated.
2374 of 1999 whereby the High Court allowed the writ petition filed by respondent No.1 herein and set aside the order dated 05.08.1998 passed by the College Tribunal, Nagpur University, Nagpur in Appeal No.
It was held that the respondent No.1 was number appointed on a regular basis but his appointment was only on temporary ad hoc basis and it was for a specified term as a part time Lecturer.
1 was appointed as part time Lecturer in Geography on temporary basis upto 30.04.1998.
Facts of the case lie in a narrow companypass.
By order dated 05.08.1998, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the termination order.
The appointment was temporary.
Challenging the said order, the College filed an appeal being L.P.A. No.
2374 of 1999 before the High Court praying for setting aside of the order of Tribunal dated 05.08.1998 passed in Appeal No.
N 10 of 1998.
2374 of 1999.
26 of 2009 before the Division Bench of the High Court.
According to the respondent No.1, he was appointed as full time Lecturer.
In 2012, the respondent No.1 filed another application for restoration of the writ petition.
N 10 of 1998 before the University and College Tribunal, Nagpur in short the Tribunal under Section 59 of the Maharashtra University Act, 1994.
Challenging the said judgment, the appellants have filed this appeal by way of special leave before this Court.
30.04.1998.
The respondent No.1 also made a companyplaint to the Grievance Committee of the University to this effect.
After remand, the writ petition was restored to its original number, i.e. W.P. No.
1 in service but without paying him any back wages for long intervening period.
It came to an end by efflux of time.
It is run by appellant No.
The respondent No.1 was selected and was accordingly given appointment for the post of Lecturer in Geography as part time Lecturer vide appointment order dated 20.07.1996.
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Leave granted.
The High Court vide order dated 16.12.2008 partly allowed the writ petition and set aside the order of Tribunal dated 05.08.1998 and in companysequence also set aside the termination order dated 31.03.1998.
5 , the services of respondent No.1 were terminated w.e.f.
It is, however, number clear from the pleadings as to by which order, the Writ Petition was restored to its file.
The High Court further directed the companycerned authorities to reinstate the respondent No.1 on the post of Lecturer but without payment of any back wages to him.
Heard Mr. A.K. Sanghi, learned senior companynsel for the appellants and Mr. Nitin Bhardwaj, learned companynsel for respondent No.1, Mr. Kishor Lambat, learned companynsel for respondent No.2 and Ms. Shubhada K. Phattankar, learned companynsel for respondent No.3.
The appellant No.
They, however, need mention in brief to appreciate the short companytroversy involved in the appeal.
In the Academic Session 1997 1998, another advertisement was issued and vide appointment order dated 21.07.1997, respondent No.
This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 01.08.2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Nagpur in Writ Petition No.
Challenging the order of termination, respondent No.1 filed an appeal being Appeal No.
It was also dismissed in default on 08.04.2011.
The facts are taken from the SLP.
It was for a fixed period from 01.08.1996 to 30.04.1997.
2 published an advertisement on 23.06.1996 inviting application for the posts of Lecturers.
1, which is a registered trust society at Bhandara.
Pragati Mahila Mahavidyalaya appellant No.2 herein is a girls companylege at Bhandara, Maharashtra.
By order dated 23.06.2009, the Division Bench disposed of the appeal and remanded the matter to the Single Judge of the High Court for deciding it afresh on merits.
149 of 2010 was filed by respondent No.1 for restoration of the writ petition.
Thereafter an application being Civil Application No.
