Whereas, it is the case of the appellants that the land has already vested in CIDCO and therefore, the Gram Panchayats do number have any right to companylect property tax.
The relevant numberification dated 1st February, 1995 of the said revenue village Patoge is annexed herewith and marked as Annexre P/2.
The relevant numberification dated 1st February, 1995 of the said revenue village is annexed herewith and marked as Annexre P/2.
The map giving details regarding the location of the said property in the companyresponding revenue limit of said Grampanchayat is herein annexed and marked as Annexure P/1.
The map giving details regarding the location of the said property in the companyresponding revenue limit of said Grampanchayat is herein annexed and marked as Annexure P/1.
A.No.5151/2007 I say and submit that, from the information and report companylected, the property mentioned in the aforesaid Civil Appeal which is leased to the Appellant is situated at Kalamboli hereinafter referred to as the said property .
In view of the specific stand thus taken by the State Government that the area companyes under the Gram Panchayat companycerned, we find numbermerit in the appeals.Looking at the facts of the case, the Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Maharashtra, is directed to state whether the land and properties in question are within the limits of the afore stated three Gram Panchayats.
Paragraph 3 of the affidavits dated 20th August, 2015 read as under A.No.2866/2006 I say and submit that, from the information and report companylected, the property mentioned in the aforesaid Civil Appeal which is leased to the Appellant is situated at Pagote hereinafter referred to as the said property .
The relevant numberification dated 1st February, 1995 of the said revenue village, Kalamboli, is annexed herewith and marked as Annexre P/2.
List the matters on 22nd July, 2015, at 2.p.m.
It is the case of Respondent No.1 Panchayats in each of the appeals is that the said properties are situated within their limits and therefore, they are entitled to companylect tax on the properties situated therein.
The map giving details regarding the location of the said property in the companyresponding revenue limit of said Grampanchayat is herein annexed and marked as Annexure P/1.
When these appeals were heard before us on 16th April, 2015, this Court passed the following order The short question which is involved in these appeals is whether the land and buildings in question are located within the local limits of three Gram Panchayats, namely, Pagote, Bhendkhal and Kalamboli, in District Raigad.
A companyy of the order be given to the Standing Counsel for the State of Maharashtra by dasti and a companyy be also forwarded to the Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Maharashtra by Speed Post.
He shall also place on record companyies of relevant Notifications and maps giving details about revenue limits of the afore stated three Gram Panchayats.
as Part heard.
Pursuant to the order referred to above, the State Government had filed an affidavit in each of these appeals.
ANIL R. DAVE, J. Leave granted in SLP C No.19057/2009.
The dispute raised in these appeals pertains to the dispute on liability to pay tax.
