with him for the Petitioner J U D G M E N T The following Judgment of the Court was delivered SAGHIR AHMAD Indefatigable stamina to litigate has been exhibited by the parties in this case in which proceedings started on 5.2.1965 when the respondent, as landlord of the premises in question, filed a petition under Section 14 1 b of the Delhi Rent Control Act for the eviction of the petitioner on the ground of subletting.
The petitioner challenged the judgment of the Rent Controller in an appeal filed before the Rent Control Tribunal which was allowed on 3rd march, 1978 and the eviction order was set aside.
217 of 1978 which was allowed on 26th September, 1994 and the case was remanded to the Tribunal to re hear the appeal.
Rent Controller and the petitioner was directed to be evicted as it was established on record that the premises had been sublet by the petitioner in companytravention of the prohibitory provisions of the Act.
This application was allowed on 29th August, 1974 by the Addl.
The respondent landlord approached the Delhi High Court in second appeal SAO No.
The petitioner, thereafter, filed S.A. No.
Naresh Thanai and Rajeev Sharma, Advs.
