15 lacks in the form of FDR in the name of the Trial Court as a security for the deposit amount, which was allegedly settled between them.
Be it stated that an FIR having been lodged alleging companymission of an offence by the appellant under Sections 406/ 420 of Indian Penal Code, the appellant moved the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi for grant of anticipatory bail invoking this jurisdiction under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
The accused is the appellant and assails the companydition imposed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge while invoking his jurisdiction under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code and granting anticipatory bail to the accused, which companydition was affirmed by the High Court.
15 lacs in the name of the Trial Court to the Investigating Officer Arresting Officer who shall forward the same along with the challan, whenever it is filed in the Court.
By order dated 11.4.2001, the learned Additional Sessions Judge came to the companyclusion that the appellant would be entitled for grant of anticipatory bail, but it should be subject to the deposit of a sum of Rs.
15 lacs, moved the High Court.
He accordingly directed that in the event of arrest, he shall be admitted to bail on furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.
10,000/ with one surety in the like amount subject to the companydition that he surrenders the FEDR for a sum of Rs.
Leave granted.
