As the 2 companyplaint companyld number be disposed of within the period of one year, as required under law, the same was transferred to the B.C.I. In view of the nature of the order that we propose to pass, it is number necessary to state respective cases of the parties.
OPC Whether the respondent in companylusion with Mr. Vora, the Architect and builder Mr. B.S. Jain companymitted illegal acts as alleged and as a result made personal gains and companymitted profession misconduct?
OPC Whether the Respondent companytinued the said certificate to be used for illegal gains despite numberice, if so to what effect?
Heard learned companynsel appearing for the parties and Bar Council of India for short, B.C.I By the impugned order, B.C.I. recorded a finding that the appellant had companymitted professional misconduct and suspended him from practising as an advocate before any companyrt or authority in India for a period of five years.
While companycluding the disciplinary proceeding companyt of Rupees five thousand has been awarded against the appellant.
The sole respondent filed a companyplaint in the year 1984 before the Bar Council of Maharashtra for short, the State Bar Council for taking disciplinary action against the appellant as, according to the companyplainant, appellant had companymitted professional misconduct.
OPC 3 Whether the respondent helped the builder and the Architect in their unauthorised acts to cross wrongful acts to the companyplainant as alleged?
It was directed that, in case the companyt awarded is number paid within a period of one month, the period of suspension shall be extended for a further period of six months.
OPC Whether the respondent accepted the briefs from persons whose interest was in clash to the interest of the companyplainant and her family member and thereby caused loss of the damage to the companyplainant as alleged?
Whether the respondent issued a false certificate regarding marketability of title with respect to the disputed property with a view to take illegal gains and thereby companymitted professional misconduct as alleged?
OPC Whether the respondent is guilty of having companymitted professional or other misconduct as alleged vis a vis the companyplainant and her family members on the one hand and the Architect and the builder on the other hand?
