Subsequently a second advertisement was issued on 27.5.1984 with reference to vacancies reserved for Scheduled Castes, and the appellant made a second application.
From the Judgment and order dated 23.1.1986 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Writ Appeal No.
In response to an advertisement issued by the Commission for filling up a large number of vacancies of District Munsifs by direct recruitment, the appellant applied.
22 of 1985.
Since the appellant was number in actual law practice, reliance has been placed on his behalf on the Proviso tc the aforementioned Rule, which is quoted below Provided that in the case of a person who is already in Government service and who applied for appointment to the post of District Munsif by direct recruitment, he must have actually practised for a period of number less than 3 years immediately prior to the date of his entering the Government service.
22 of 1985.
His present claim is with respect to these reserved posts.
The appeal was allowed and the writ petition was dismissed.
The respondents challenged the decision under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent in the High Court in Writ Appeal No.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The learned Single Judge allowed the prayer and directed the first respondent to companysider the candidature of the appellant for the appointment in question.
3400 of 1987.
V.S.N. Chari for the Respondents.
K. Ramamurthi, Attar Singh and G.N. Rao for the Appellant.
1, which the appellant challenged before the Andhra Pradesh High Court by a writ petition.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHARMA, J. The appellants application for appointment as a District Munsif by the State of Andhra Pradesh in the quota reserved for Scheduled Castes was rejected by the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission briefly described as the Commission , respondent No.
