When resisted by the members of the public, you and your associates attacked them causing injuries to some of them and terrorised them by hurling bombs towards them.
In so far as the second ground is companycerned, according to the petitioner, at the time of the alleged incident, i.e., at 11.45 a.m. on August 6, 1971, he was at the dispensary of the doctor appointed by the Employees State Insurance for Gogalbbai Jute Mills where he had eone with the object of taking medical leave for a companyple of days because he was sick and was running temperature.
The grounds of detention were served on him on the same day.
In other words the petitioner ,pleads alibi with respect to both the grounds.
His case was placed before the Advisory Board on November 1, 1971 as required by S. 10 of the Act and the said Board made its report on December 10, 197 1.
swords and iron rods.
Being panickstricken, the local people started to run aimlessly and the market was closed instantaneously.
1971 which was duly companysidered by the said Government on October 29, 1971.
On 6 8 71 at about 11.45 hours, you and your associates Netai Patra, Asto Patra, Amjed, Habi Khara and 15/20 others being armed with ballam, sword and bombs etc.,
The grounds for the petitioners detention duly companymunicated to him under S. 8 1 of the Act are On 7 7 71 after 19.30 hours you and your associates As to Patra, Netai Patra, Habi Khara and others terrorised the members of the public, who assembled in the field of Shri Saraj Ghosal near Fuleswar Rly.
The petitioner Borjahan Gorey, who claims to be a laborer working in Gogalbhai Jute Mills was arrested on October 5, 1971 pursuant to the impugned order of detention.
The local people being panicky started running helter and skelter but you and your associates obstructed them by brandishing.
Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India for tile enforcement of fundamental rights.
You and your associates created a reign of terror and companytinued your rowdy activities till a police party reached there.
tended Shri Jain.
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.
As in the opinion of the Board there was sufficient cause for the petitioners detention the State Government companyfirmed the impugned order on December 23, 1971 and companymunicated this fact to the petitioner on the same day.
K. Chakraborty and G. S. Chatterjee for the respondent.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Dua, J This is a petition under Art.
Station to decide the actions to be taken against the anti social activities, like snatching away valuables from the passengers from running trains, carried on by you and your associates, by exploding bombs at a distance of 8/10 cubits from the place of meeting.
Hiralal fain for the petitioner.
formed an unlawful assembly in front of the shop of Pranab Sarkar of Kalsafa market, P. S. Uluberia and attacked one Basudev Sarkar causing severe injuries on his person.
1 and 2 of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 26 of 1971 hereinafter called the Act .
32 of the Constitution challenging the order of the petitioners detention dated September 23, 1971 made by the District Magistrate, Howrah, under S. 3, sub ss.
192 of 1972.
He made a representation to the State Government on October 25.
The impugned order of detention is accordingly companytended to be insupportable being based on number existing facts.
