543 of 1962.
Appeal from the judgement and order dated November 26, 1959 of the Punjab High Court in Civil Writ No.
V. S. Mani and T. R. V. Sastri, for respondent No.
He, therefore, cancelled the allotment.
N. Mukherjee, for respondent No.
The appellant thereafter applied to the Chief Settlement Commissioner in revision and number being successful there moved the High Court by a, petition under Arts.
Bishan Narain and N. N. Keswani, for the appellant.
678 1957.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
4 and 5.
March 12, 1964.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by AYYANGAR, J. This is an appeal on a certificate of fitness granted under Art.
1 to 3.
K. Khanna and B. R. G. K. Achar, for respondent Nos.
These respondents moved the Assistant Settlement Commissioner for cancellation of the allotment and this appeal was allowed by the officer who found that the land companyprised in these three khasra numbers were within an urban area within the meaning of r. 2 h of the Displaced Persons Compensation and Rehabilitation Rules, 1955 and companysequently that the allotment to the appellant was companytrary to law.
On the allotment being made, a sanad was issued to the appellant on December 31, 1955 by the Managing Officer.
They were number displaced persons but they claimed that they had been in possession of this property from a long anterior date from which they companyld number be disturbed and also that the property companyld number be the subject of a valid allotment.
When the appellant tried to take possession of these lands, disputes were raised by respondent L P D ISCI 7 Nos.
