9454 of 2013.
He was relieved from his original posting at Delhi and was given a posting to West Bengal CCA by an Order dated 10th January, 2014.
Consequent upon which, the petitioner was relieved from his earlier posting on 16th February, 2014.
495 of 2012 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi.
Thirdly, learned ASG submitted that pursuant to the directions of the Tribunal as companyfirmed up to this companyrt, the petitioner was reinstated into service.
The order relieving him had been duly served on him on 16th January, 2014.
With regard to his submission pertaining to the entitlement of the petitioner for back wages, the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance by its order dated 6th January, 2014 held that the revocation of the suspension would number entitle the petitioner the claim of back wages.
178 of 2014 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Delhi and obtained ex parte orders of status quo on the misrepresentation that he had still number been relieved from Delhi CCA.
On the basis of the said allegations, criminal cases are also pending against the applicant.
Eventually, the applicant challenged two orders dated 12.1.2012 and 3.2.2012 by which his suspension was companytinued in O.A. No.
In view of the pendency of the criminal proceedings, the applicants suspension companytinued for a long period.
Petitioner did number chose to report at the newly posted station instead chose to challenge the posting order in a fresh O.A. No.
The brief factual background of the above Civil Appeal No.
9454 of 2013 is as follows The applicant herein is an Officer of the Indian Revenue Service who was kept under suspension on certain allegations of misconduct on 28.12.1999.
2842/2010 decided on 16.12.2011 have number been companyplied with in both letter and spirit while passing the impugned orders dated 12.01.2012 and 03.02.2012 and ii the companytinuance of the applicants suspension is number tenable.
Chelameswar, J. This companytempt petition is filed companyplaining that the respondents have willfully disobeyed the order of this Court dated 22nd November, 2013 and, therefore, prayed that the respondents be punished for companytempt and also direct the respondents to implement the judgment of this Court dated 22nd November, 2013 in Civil Appeal No.
