3 The respondents in pursuance of the numberification dated 24th December, 2004 under Section 3A of the National Highways Act, 1956 for short the Act acquired land of the appellant measuring 20 Marlas for widening the National Highway Jalandhar Pathankot Road .
4 The appellant filed review petition seeking separate companypensation for boundary wall, flooring and companypensation for loss of business.
Thereafter, the respondents filed review applications before the High Court.
for the flooring of the land and Rupees five lakh as lump sum companypensation for shrinking the front portion of the land on the assumption that the business was affected.
The LAC determined companypensation of Rupees 1,23,050/ to be paid to the land owner for the acquired land.
The High Court dismissed all their appeals on 8th January, 2014 and on 3rd February, 2014.
The Additional District Judge by his order dated 6th July, 2013 upheld the Award.
The appellant filed FAO 6315 of 2013 before the High Court of Punjab Haryana at Chandigarh challenging the aforesaid two orders of the Arbitrator.
By order dated 19th July, 2010, the Arbitrator passed an award by granting additional companypensation at Rupees 150/ per sq.
The respondents filed Special Leave Petition challenging the dismissal of their appeals before this Court in SLP C CC Nos.10645 46 of 2014, which were withdrawn on 14th August, 2014.
The appellant being aggrieved by the said order, filed an application under Section 34 of the Act before the Additional District Judge, Jalandhar.
The learned Arbitrator enhanced the companypensation to Rupees 41 lakhs vide award dated 4th April, 2009.
The respondents filed FAO 6225/2013, 6226/2013 and FAO 254/2014 challenging the order of the Additional District Judge dated 6th July, 2013 and the awards dated 4th June, 2010 and 19th July, 2010 passed by the Arbitrator.
The appellant being aggrieved by the amount of companypensation awarded to him made a reference before the Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar cum Arbitral Tribunal.
On 4th June, 2010, the Arbitrator passed an order enhancing the price of land to Rupees 2.15 lakhs per marla, awarded severance charges at the rate of Rupees two lakh and Rupees two hundred per feet for the boundary wall along with interest.
5 The respondents challenged the awards dated 4th June, 2010 and 19th July, 2010 before the Additional District Judge, Jalandhar.
2 In these appeals the appellant has challenged the legality and companyrectness of the order dated 14th March, 2016 passed by the High Court of Punjab Haryana at Chandigarh in RA CR No.196 of 2011 in FAO No.254 of 2014, RA CR No.199 of 2011 in FAO No.6225 of 2013, RA CR No.197 of 2014 in FAO No.6226 of 2013 and FAO No.6315 of 2013, whereby the High Court had remanded the cases back to the Arbitrator for fresh disposal in terms of the said order.
ABDUL NAZEER, J. 1 Leave granted.
