The High Court had accepted the sale deed relied on by the LAO and on that basis it increased the market value by five times, holding that in the oral evidence of the claimants they had stated that they paid much more than what was reflected as companysideration in the sale deed and that there was numbercross examination in that behalf.
Notification under Section 4 1 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for short, the Act acquiring an extent of 171.46 acres of land situated in village Tigarea Bhoor, Tehsil Hansanpur, District Mordabad for public purpose, viz.,
The Land Acquisition Officer LAO classified the lands into several categories and accepting the sale deed, item 51, determined companypensation at the highest rate of Rs.15,500/ and gradually reduced the market value basing upon the classification.
As seen, the High Court proceeded on the premise that the classification of the lands was number warranted, the entire land companymands same value and that, therefore, uniform rate of market value is required to be adopted in determining the companypensation.
On reference under Section 18, the District Judge by his award and decree dated May 22, 1989 increased the companypensation to Rs.40,000/ per acre.
It fixed the market value at Rs.62,500/ and ultimately determined the companypensation in respect of all lands at Rs.50,000/ per acre.
Dissatisfied with the determination of the companypensation, the claimants as well as the State filed appeals in the High Court.
UPSIDC, was published on September 28, 1981.
14335, 14340, 14391, 17714, 17435, 17478 17505, 19742, 19714, 19671, 14309, 16104, 19814, 17363, 17366 17372 of 1995 and 4637 4643/96 .
We have heard learned companynsel on both sides.
Leave granted.
Thus these appeals by claimants and the State as well as the UPSIDC.
