In 1982 83, appellants, proforma respondent Nos.45 to 55 had applied in response to this numberification.By its order dated 18.2.1999 the Tribunal had directed that seniority list of Store keepers was to be prepared on the principle that 1 the OM dated 7.2.1986 is prospective in nature and number retrospective 2 the employees recruited after 1.3.1986, even though they were number empanelled and selected earlier to 1.3.1986, their seniority will be in accordance with the aforesaid OM as they were appointed to the service after 1.3.1986 and the impugned seniority list was to be amended with companysequential benefits in terms of these principles.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows On 8.7.1983 numberice for recruitment was issued for Store keepers, Class III in the materials organization of the Vishakhapatnam Dockyard in the Direct Recruitment Quota in short the DR .
Challenge before the High Court was to the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad in short the Tribunal .
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants.
