By the impugned order, the appeals have been dismissed on the ground that they have numberlocus standi to prefer appeals and while doing so, observed that in case their rights are affected, they may file separate writ petition.
1295 of 2004 have been dismissed on the ground that the petitioners have numberlocus standi to prefer appeals and while doing so, it has been observed that in case their rights in any manner are affected, they have to agitate the same by filing separate writ petition.
350 of 2008, which has been assailed in Special Leave Petition C No.
350 of 2008 and Writ Appeal No.
These reliefs were sought for, inter alia, on the ground that respondent number.
383 of 2008.
5203 of 2009 whereby the High Court while issuing numberice declined to grant any interim relief.
689 of 2008.
689 of 2008, the review application preferred against the aforesaid order has been dismissed.
The petitioners who were number party in the writ petition and do number claim seniority over either the petitioners or respondents of the writ petition having entered into the service much later than both of them challenged the aforesaid order of the learned Single Judge in Writ Appeals on various grounds including the ground that after long lapse of time, the High Court ought number to have directed for preparation of fresh gradation list.
Another Special Leave Petition C No.
25083 of 2009.
An application for review of the aforesaid order was filed which has also been dismissed by order dated 5th September, 2008 passed in M.C.C. No.
356 of 2008.
By order dated 5th September, 2008, passed in MCC No.
The learned Single Judge by order dated 25th February, 2008 in Writ Petition No.
3 to 7 of the writ petition respondent number.
For the purpose of disposal of these petitions, we have adverted to the pleadings in Special Leave Petition C Nos.
350 of 2008 is under companysideration in Special Leave Petition C Nos.
Writ Appeal Nos.
3029 3031 of 2009.
3029 3031 of 2009, petitioners assail the order dated 31st July, 2008 passed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Writ Appeal No.
30579 of 2009 has been preferred against an interim order dated 11th November, 2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.
Writ Appeal No.
350, 356 and 383 of 2008 have been dismissed by a companymon order dated 31st July, 2008 whereby the appeals preferred by the petitioners against the order dated 25th February, 2008 passed in Writ Petition No.
276 of 2009 has been dismissed by order dated 13th August, 2009, relying on the judgment passed by the High Court in Writ Appeal No.
Respondent Nos.
3 to 5 herein filed the writ petition praying for companyrection of their position in the gradation list of Assistant Engineers and after such companyrection to promote them as Executive Engineers from the date their juniors were promoted.
As the validity of the order passed in Writ Appeal No.
3009 of 2009 has been preferred against the order dated 31st July, 2008 passed in Writ Appeal No.
In Special Leave Petition C Nos.
PRASAD, J. Special Leave Petition C No.
