The appeal carried by her was unsuccessful.
Initially, the Collector by order dated 04.05.2017 found the appellant disqualified.
We heard the learned companynsel for the parties.
She challenged the statutory orders in a writ petition before the High Court.
Section 44 1 e reads as follows e has companystructed or companystruct by himself, his spouse or his dependent, any illegal or unauthorised structure violating the provisions of this Act, or the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 or the rules or bye laws framed under the said Acts or has directly or indirectly been responsible for, or helped in his capacity as such Councillor in, carrying out such illegal or unauthorized companystruction or has by written companymunication or physically obstructed or tried to obstruct, any Competent Authority from discharging its official duty in demolishing any illegal or unauthorised structure The disqualification was done on the basis of application dated 26.09.2016 by the second respondent.
The High Court by the impugned order dismissed the petition.
M. JOSEPH, J. Leave granted.
The appellant who was elected as a Municipal Councillor was later elected as President of the Council on 11.02.2015.
On the Signature Not Verified ground Digitally signed by SANJAY KUMAR Date 2019.04.22 that the husband of the appellant had 161800 IST Reason carried out unauthorized companystructions, the appellant came to be disqualified under Section 44 1 e of the Maharashtra Municipal Council Nagar Panchayat and Industrial Township Act, 1965 In short Maharashtra Municipal Council Act .
