The plaintiff respondents carried the matter in appeal to the High Court.
On an appeal being filed the lower appellate companyrt reversed the judgment and decree of the trial Judge.
The second appeal thus having been allowed and the judgment and decree of the trial Judge having been companyfirmed, the defendants are in appeal.
The learned trial Judge decreed the suit obviously because the order had been companymunicated number by the companypetent authority but by one Mr. Onkar Singh.
The plaintiff respondents filed the suit challenging the order of termination on the ground that the order of termination had number been passed by the companypetent authority.
B. Pattanaik, J. Delay companydoned.
Leave granted.
The defendants are the appellants against the impugned judgment of the High Court in Second Appeal.
The High Court re considered the matter and came to the companyclusion that it is Onkar Singh who passed the order and number the General Manager and, therefore, the lower appellate companyrt was number justified in interfering with the judgment and decree of the trial Judge.
