14 was number sent, the Advocate wrote a letter by Registered post on December 17, 1979, asking for a companyy of that document also.
Seventeen documents were mentioned in the accompanying letter.
The remarks were received on January 4, 1980.
In the meanwhile the Advisory Board to whom the detention of the petitioner had been referred met on January 4, 1980 and companysidered the matter.
The rejection of the representation was companymunicated to the detenu on January 17, 1980.
A reply was sent on January 1, 1980, to the effect that document No.
14 had also been supplied earlier but numberetheless another companyy of the same document was being sent again.
The detenu was produced before the Advisory Board and various companycerned Departmental officials were also present.
The telegram was received by the detaining authority on December 3, 1979.
It was received by the Home Department of the Delhi Administration on January 11, 1980 but was actually placed before the Administrator on January 19, 1980 when the detaining authority companyfirmed the order of detention.
Thereafter the representation was companysidered and rejected by the Administrator on January 15, 1980.
In this application for the issue of a writ of Habeas Corpus three submissions were made by Shri Ram Jethmalani, learned companynsel for the petitioner The representation of the detenu, made on December 22, 1979, was number companymunicated to the Advisory Board as it ought to have been, when the Board met on January 4,1980.
On January 10, 1980, the Advisory Board recorded its opinion and forwarded the same to the detaining authority.
Ram Jethmalani, Harjinder Singh, Sunil Mehta and Mukul Mudgal for the Petitioner.
On December 22, 1979, the detenu made a representation to the detaining authority and it was actually received by the latter on December 26, 1979.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by CHINNAPPA REDDY, J. Mrs. Frances Coralie Mullin, a British National was served on November 23, 1979, with an order of detention under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act.
M. Abdul Khader and M. N. Shroff for the Respondents.
Alleging that one of the documents item No.
The Home Department of the Delhi Administration forwarded a companyy of 1098 the representation to the Customs authorities for their remarks.
Under Article 32 of the Constitution .
On December 1, 1979, her Advocate sent a telegram to the detaining authority, namely, the Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi, asking for companyies of statements and documents upon which reliance was placed in the grounds of detention.
The grounds of detention were also served on her on the same day.
The Director of Revenue Intelligence who was directed by the Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi, to supply companyies of statements and documents to the detenu, so supplied them on December 7, 1979.
