From the Judgment of the Tribunal it appears that the claimants based their claim on the facts that the deceased Virender Singh was the owner of three vehicles mini buses and also certain agricultural land.
She also admitted in her cross examination that the deceased was number filing any income tax returns.
The said motor cycle was hit by a truck bearing registration No.
Aggrieved by the said determination of the companypensation made by the Tribunal, the claimants as well as the appellant herein carried the matter in Appeal to the High Court of Rajasthan.
Respondents 1 to 6 herein filed an application against the appellant herein and others for companypensation.
The Tribunal, by its Judgment dated 06 02 2006, awarded an amount of Rs.10,00,000 00 and provided for appropriate deductions for the amounts, which had already been paid and also gave necessary directions for safeguarding the interest of the minor children.
RJ 14G 1556, resulting in the death of both Vijender Singh and Bhagwan Das.
The appellant, admittedly, is the insurer of the abovementioned truck.
Respondent No.1 is the wife, Respondents 2 to 5 are the children, Respondent No.6, we are informed, is the mother of the deceased Vijender Singh.
A huge claim of Rs.1,86,30,000/ , was made towards companypensation on the ground that the deceased Vijender Singh was earning more than Rs.35,000/ per month.
Appeal No.1222 of 2006 was partially allowed modifying the Award of the Tribunal.
Admittedly, the Appeal preferred by the appellant herein was dismissed, whereas the Appeal preferred by the claimants S.B. Civil Misc.
Chelameswar, J. Leave granted.
One Vijender Singh along with two others Bhagwan Das and Manish, was travelling by a motor cycle on 10 12 2002.
Hence, the present Appeal.
