the rent was payable in advance.
on 2 august 1976 the appellant filed an application for ejectment out of which the present appeal arises.
the re spondent received a numberice on 7 may 1976 calling upon him to pay the arrears of rent.
the rent in fact had been re ceived upto 31 march 1976 and therefore when the numberice of demand was served on the appellant rent for the months of april and may 1976 had fallen due.
the appellant refused to accept it.
the appellant received the bank draft and retained it.
from the judgment and order dated 20.9.1982 of the delhi high companyrt in s.a.o.
with effect from 1 january 1972 the rent payable was rs.
515 per month.
after filing the application for ejectment the appellant informed the respondent that both the bank drafts sent by him were lying uncashed.
on 29 numberember 1972 the companytractual tenancy was determined by numberice.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 3119 of 1984.
this is a landladys appeal by special leave arising out of proceedings for the ejectment of the respondent tenant.
the tribunal numbered that the rent had number been paid for the months of april may and june 1976 in advance for each month and therefore the respondent had companymitted three companysecutive defaults.
chitale and mukul mudgal for the appellant.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by pathak cj.
on 11 june 1976 the appellant sent anumberher bank draft for rs.515 to the landlady and this draft again was neither encashed number returned.
the appellant let out the premises in suit to the respondent on 1 september 1962 the rent being stipulated as payable in advance.
vimal sinha for the respondent.
number 181 of 1979.
on 13 may 1976 the respondent offered a bank draft of rs.515 to the appellant.
on 7 june 1976 the appellant wrote to the respondent informing him that his tender was number valid.
singh and mrs.
k. garg gopal singh l.r.
two days later the respondent sent the same bank draft by registered post.
