Thereafter, when one Satyanarain, the first respondent in this appeal had obstructed delivery of the possession, on the next day, namely, 25 5 1979, he made an application under Order 21, Rule 35 3 for police assistance to remove the obstruction caused by Satyanarain.
The Court directed the appellant to make an application under Order 21, Rule 97 pursuant to which the appellant made second application on 18 7 1979 under Order 21, Rule 97 CPC for removal of obstruction caused by Satyanarain.
On the even day, he filed a third application under Order 21, Rule 97 CPC which was dismissed on 20 2 1982 as being barred by res judicata.
On an appeal filed by the appellant, the Civil Judge, Bikaner, by his order dated 19 5 1983, directed removal of the obstruction holding that the third application was number precluded to be filed by the appellant.
The District Munsif, Executing Court, on 12 1 t981, dismissed that application as being barred by limitation under Article 129 of the Schedule to the Indian Limitation Act, 1963.
352 of 1983 filed by Satyanarain in the impugned order dated 3 2 1987 set aside the order of the appellate companyrt and companyfirmed that of the executing companyrt.
Thereafter, the appellant filed an execution application under Order 21, Rule 35 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for short the CPC, on 24 5 1979.
175/71 from the High Court of Rajasthan on 21 3 1979 of ejectment of Ram Kishan, mesne profits till date of possession and also arrears of rent.
The High Court in Civil Revision No.
On further review, the High Court companyfirmed its earlier order.
The appellant had obtained a decree in Second Appeal No.
That decree had become final.
Thus, this appeal by special leave against both the orders.
