In the said suit, the appellants took out a numberice of motion for grant of injunction for the following terms a the pending the hearing and final disposal of this suit, any companystruction activities in view of the IOD dated 19.07.07 CC dated 08.02.08 and sanctioned plan dated 19th July, 2007 on CTS No.
The learned Trial Judge by an order dated 16.02.2009 opined that as the appellants failed to obtain an essentiality certificate and C.T.S. No.
in the plot CTS No.
The rest 33 persons, thus, have accepted that they had numberright under the agreement.
62 situated at Moolgaon, Andheri Mumbai b that pending the hearing and final disposal of this suit any companystruction activities in view of the IOD dated 18 10 2007 CC dated 18 10 2007 and sanctioned plan dated 19th July, 2007 on CTS No.
Furthermore, indisputably, 66 persons were occupying the same plot No.
7 of 2009 praying inter alia for a declaration That this Honble Court may be pleased to declare that the agreements under the head as Agreement between Slum dwellers and Developer as identical to Exhibit B to the plaint entered into on different dates between Defendant No.
82 situated at Moolgaon, Andheri E , Mumbai be stayed in the interest of justice.
82 village Mulgaon.
1 and 2 and the plaintiff are effective, subsisting and binding on the parties and accordingly the plaintiffs are entitled to be provided a flat of carpet area of 225 sq.
61 was number declared as slum area, the question of taking recourse to the slum rehabilitation scheme did number arise.
The appellants filed a suit in the City Civil Court at Bombay which was marked as Short Cause Suit No.
Inter alia on the premise that the appellants failed to obtain eligibility certificate, the respondents started companystruction of companymercial building on Survey No.
82 situated at Moolgaon, Andheri E Mumbai be stayed in the interest of justice.
B. Sinha, J. Leave granted.
Appellants herein are slum dwellers.
carpet area which will be companysisted for them on CTS No.
Consent Slum dwellers hereby agree and give companysent to participate in SPA as per DCR 10 , Appendix IV.
The suit, however, has been filed by 33 persons.
