Thereafter in 1965, the appellants, claiming to have become entitled to purchase it applied to the authorities for starting proceedings under Section 32G of the Act for determination of purchase price.
Pursuant to that decision the Collector of Nasik passed an order on 31st April, 1963 for termination of the management and the respondent was put in possession of his land on 31.7.1963.
The Mamlatdar dropped those proceedings by an order dated Nov. 13, 1968 as he was of the view that the appellants were numberlonger tenants of the land and, therefore, did number become entitled to purchase it.
The Assistant Collector then gave it on lease to the appellants for ten years i.e. from March 10, 1953 to March 31, 1963.
The appellants preferred an appeal to the Special Deputy Collector who allowed the same.
He, then filed a revision application before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal.
The respondent preferred an appeal to the Collector but it was dismissed.
It was allowed and the case was remanded to the Mamlatdar.
This time the Malatdar recorded a companytrary finding and fixed the purchase price.
Aggrieved thereby, the respondent preferred an appeal to the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal.
On January 31, 1963 the Government decided to terminate the management on expiry of 10 years.
