Thus they opposed the pro bate of the will.
The petitioner also claimed that she was a trustee of John Browne Trust and that therefore, the peti tioner has caveatable interest.
Before the Sub Court, several documents were filed.
1984 of the Madras High Court in Civil Revision Petition No.
In that proceeding, the petitioner and her deceased husband lodged a caveat on the ground that the said Mary Aline Browne did number execute any will and the will propounded by the respondent was a fictitious and forged one, intended to disentitle Zoe Enid Browne, daughter of the testatrix from claiming interest in the estate of her mother.
5539 of 1983.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by JAYACHANDRA REDDY, J. We have heard both the sides and the matter is being disposed of at the admission stage.
The respondent herein companytested the caveat stating that the petitioner herein has numberinterest in the estate.
The same is numbered as O.S. No.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION S.L.P. Civil No.
1962 filed an application for letters of Administration with a companyy of the will annexed in the Sub Court, Nilgiris.
This petition is directed against the order of a learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court companyfirming the order passed by the Subordinate Judge, Nilgiris.
The petitioner also claimed that Zoe Enid Browne executed a will dated 23.6.1975 in favour of the petitioner and that she also executed a gift deed in her favour.
Alongwith the application the respondent also filed an affidavit of an attestor of the Will.
28592 of 1988.
8896 of 1985.
The testatrix had a daughter of the name of Zoe Enid Browne and she died on 8.10.1977.
F. Nariman, J.P. Pathak, M.B. Shivraj and P.H. Parekh for the Petitioner.
The matter arises under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 Act for short and the facts that give rise to the petition are as follows The testatrix Mary Aline Browne was the wife of Herbet Evander Browne who was the eldest son of one John Browne.
From the Judgment and Order dated 18.12.
WITH M.P. No.
S. Krishnamurthy Iyer and Mrs. S. Dikshit for the Respondent.
23 of 1980.
The respondent claiming to be the beneficiary to the estate of Mary Aline Browne who died on 28.3.1972 under the terms of a will said to have been exe cuted by her on 12.3.
