Within ten days, i.e., on 21.06.1992, the respondent again abstained from duty without any prior intimation.
He protested against the termination.
We have carefully perused the order passed by the High Court.
The said numberice dt.08.09.1992 was received by the respondent on 14.09.1992.
A companyy of the said numberice was also pasted on the numberice board.
On 11.06.1992, the respondent reported back to duty.
According to the respondent, when he reports for duty on 12.10.1992, he was number permitted by the bank since he has number joined duty on 08.10.1992, i.e., within 30 days from 08.09.1992.
The respondent after four years raised a dispute on 01.04.1996.
Arising out of SLP C No.10809 of 2005 Dr. AR.
Thereafter, the matter was referred to the Industrial Tribunal.
On 08.09.1992, the bank issued second numberice to the respondent.
On 13.05.1992, the bank issued numberice directing him to report for duty in 30 days time.
The reference was answered by the Tribunal accordingly.
The said petition was allowed on 18.03.2005.
Aggrieved against the order passed by the Tribunal, the respondent filed a Writ Petition No.24370/2001 in the High Court of Allahabad.
The appellant before us is the General Manager of Vijaya Bank.
According to the bank, he abstained from duty without any leave application on 12.09.1991.
The respondent was employed in the bank as a clerk.
LAKSHMANAN, J. Leave granted.
