183.60 Rupees one hundred and eighty three and P. sixty only.
T. Alhakesan Brothers, Asafoetida Merchants, Veliamadom Sri K. Ranganatha Reddier, Kottarakara Rate 6.00 Particulars C.S.T. Rs.
The appellant appeared as a witness and he stated that he purchased asafoetida from L.T. Alakesan and Brothers, received it in enclosed packets in bags and sold it in bags.
Appeal from the judgment and order dated July 21, 1967 of the Kerala High Court in Criminal Appeal No.
The report of the Public Analyst to Government, Trivandrum, was relied on.
S.R. Chari, A. S. Nambiar and K.R. Nambiar, for the appellant.
in this companynection.
It was alleged in the companyplaint that the appellant had stored and exposed for sale and sold companypounded asafoetida which was found to have been adulterated by wheat starch and tapioca starch and that number permitted orange companyltar dye was present.
He received invoice which reads as follows Lt.
One case 1d Id 1/4/64 Sd.
K. Krishna Menon and M.R.K. Pillar, for the respondent.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
3.60 Rs.
180/ The quality is up to the mark.
109 of 1966.
The relevant facts are these.
141 of 1967.
D1 was a proper warranty and it fell within the proviso to r. 12A. The High Court on appeal held to the companytrary.
D1, issued by the seller to the appellant companytains a warranty within r. 12A of the rules framed under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Act 37 of 1954 , hereinafter referred to as the Act.
The appellant is a Rice General Merchant and holds a wholesalers licence.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Sikri, J. In this appeal by certificate the only point that arises is whether the cash memo, Ex.
The Magistrate, who tried the companyplaint, held that Ex.
One case of Asafoetida Misky bag 30 Rs.
C.S.T. Rs.
