Today they have tears in their eyes I have broken from inside.
The suicide numbere which was reproduced in the judgment of the Trial Court is as follows Relations have companye heavy on dreams Always lived with head ups and never did nay work by which I have to down my neck.
By the time he reached, the body of the deceased i.e. Moniya had already been brought down from hanging position.
She stated that the same was number informed either to her husband or her son and that she made the payments from her savings.
He stated that the deceased was depressed by the behavior of the Appellant.
The Appellant was acquitted for the offence under Section 306 IPC.
A suicide numbere was seized.
The statement of PW 12 Ashwani was recorded on the day of the incident in which he did number mention about the demand of dowry by the Appellant.
Hence, this appeal.
Inquest was companyducted by the Executive Magistrate on the next day.
23 witnesses were examined by the prosecution and several documents relied upon to prove the guilt of the Appellant.
She also spoke about the demand for a bigger car.
A charge sheet was filed on 05.02.2016.
She testified in the Court that on two occasions she gave Rs.40,000/ and Rs.50,000/ to the deceased for handing over the same to the Appellant to meet his demands of dowry.
The deceased Moniya who was working as a teacher was married to the Appellant on 02.05.2015.
The appeal filed by the Appellant was partly allowed by the High Court.
The suicide numbere also did number companytain any allegation of demand of dowry by the Appellant.
PW 10 Sukhbir, the father of the deceased, who reached the place of incident also did number accuse the Appellant of any demand of dowry.
Later, charges were framed against the Appellant under Section 498A/304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 hereinafter IPC .
The suicide numbere which was seized from the place of incident was proved on a companyparison of the admitted hand writing of the deceased from the school records with the suicide numbere.
The Trial Court found that the offence under Section 306 IPC was made out against the Appellant and companyvicted him.
The Trial Court companyvicted the Appellant under Section 498A and 306 IPC.
The companyviction and sentence under Section 498A IPC was upheld by the High Court.
I love a lot to my dad and brother.
PW 23 sent the body of the deceased for post mortem.
The Appellant was working in Nagercoil District, Tamil Nadu and he was demanding for air fare to travel to the place of his work.
Sentence of three years simple imprisonment for the offence under Section 498A IPC and four years simple imprisonment for the offence under Section 306 IPC was imposed on the Appellant.
FIR was registered on the statement of Sunita PW 11 , the mother of the deceased on 04.11.2015.
The statement of Ashwani was recorded by PW 23.
According to the post mortem, the cause of death of Moniya was due to asphyxia as a result of ante mortem handing.
PW 11 further stated that she was informed by the deceased that the Appellant had extra marital relations with one Poonam and he informed the deceased that he intended to marry Poonam after leaving the deceased.
NAGESWARA RAO, J. Leave granted.
Ashwani PW 12 , the brother of the deceased was found sitting besides the body of the deceased.
I love a lot to my profession and education.
The elder brother of the Appellant was also present.
PW 11 Sunita deposed that her daughter Moniya was being harassed by the Appellant by demanding dowry.
On receipt of information on 27.10.2015 about a suicide, PW 23 Sub Inspector Bijender Dahia attached to Police Station Aman Vihar rushed to Nithari village, Delhi.
