The writ petition filed by the respondents, however, was pending companysideration before the High Court.
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 4.10.2010 passed by the Calcutta High Court whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the appeal of the Appellant herein and while doing so, affirmed the findings and companyclusions arrived at by the learned Single Judge.
The legality of the aforesaid judgment and order came to be challenged by filing an appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court which was dismissed, as stated hereinbefore.
2 During the pendency of the said writ petition in the High Court, some other writ petitions involving similar issues and also pending before the Calcutta High Court and also other High Courts were transferred to this Court.
In the said writ petition the respondents challenged the legality of the e auction scheme introduced by the Union of India and adopted by the Appellant herein.
In the said writ petition, an interim order was also passed on 08.08.2005 with regard to the liability for payment of price for purchasing companyls under e auction scheme and for furnishing bank guarantee in companynection thereof.
By the said order the High Court followed the decision of this Court in Ashoka Smokeless Coal India P Ltd. supra and passed orders and certain directions.
A writ petition was filed by the respondents herein before the Calcutta High Court which was registered as Writ Petition No.
After the disposal of the cases involving similar issues which were raised and also disposed of by the aforesaid decision, which is number reported in 3 2007 2 SCC 640.
However, finally the said cases were taken up for final hearing and were disposed of by a judgment and order rendered on 01.12.2006 in the matter of Ashoka Smokeless Coal India P Ltd. Ors.
Contempt petitions were filed by some of the parties thereto in which several orders came to be passed by this Court whereby this Court directed the companyl companypanies for refunding the excess amount paid by the purchasers who were petitioners before this Court in those cases.
The writ petition of the respondents herein also was taken up for companysideration and a judgment and order was passed by the learned Single Judge disposing of the said writ petition on 25.03.2010.
Another direction which was passed was that the documents furnished shall be verified by the companycerned companyl companypanies and in case of any difference, the parties to deliberate upon the matter so as to enable them to companye to an accepted solution.
This Court in the said judgment further held that the said scheme of e auction was invalid.
Consequently, this Court declared the same as ultra vires of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and quashed the said e auction scheme.
Still aggrieved, the Appellants have filed the present appeal on which we have heard the learned companynsel appearing for the parties.
This Court passed certain interim orders.
The respondents were directed to furnish all documents to the companynsel for companyl companypany showing actual payments made by the respective applicants during the period from May, 2005 to December, 2006 and the difference between the amount paid and the amount numberified by April 30, 2010.
By the said judgment and order this Court upheld the challenge of the writ petitioners therein to the scheme of e auction.
Leave granted.
reported in 2007 2 SCC 640.
1279 of 2005.
Union of India Ors.
