2002 Supp 2 SCR 456 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by N. KHARE, J. Leave granted.
5914/2002 S.L.P. Civil No.
It is against the said judgment of the High Court, the insurer has preferred this appeal.
v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Am.,
84,375/ .
The insured did number file any appeal.
2002 2 SCC 265 have taken a companytrary view, the matter is required to be decided by a Bench of three learned Judges.
It is against the said decision, the appeal has been preferred by the insurer and a Bench of this Court has also referred this appeal to be decided by a Bench of three learned Judges.
In Civil Appeal No.
The appeal preferred against the said award before the High Court by the insurer was dismissed on the ground that numberappeal at the instance of the insurer is maintainable as regards quantum of companypensation.
On appeal being filed by the insurer, the High Court reduced the companypensation to Rs.
Under the said enactment three actions were provided.
In Civil Appeal No.
In this appeal, the appellant questioned the maintainability of the appeal preferred by the insurer.
2000 5 SCC 113 and United India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Bhushan Sachdeva Ors.,
13,13,150/ with 20 p.a.
To meet the situation, it is for the first time The Third Parties Rights Against Insurance Act 1930 was enacted in England.
Subsequently, The Road Traffic Act 1930 was enacted which provided for the companypulsory insurance of motor vehicles.
The insurer was directed to deposit the decretal amount.
He preferred a claim petition before the Tribunal and the Tribunal granted a companypensation to the tune of Rs.
l ,50,415/ against the insurer and the insured jointly.
The dependants of the deceased filed a claim petition before the Tribunal and the Tribunal awarded companypensation to the tune of Rs.
5913/2002 S.L.P Civil No.
When this matter came up for hearing before a Bench of this Court, Learned Judges were of the view that since two Benches of this Court companyprising of two learned Judges in Rita Devi Ors.
10616/2001, identical question of law is involved and the same has been referred to a Bench of three learned Judges.
4292/2002, an accident took place on 8.8.1995 in which one Anil Kishore Roghtagi died.
In Civil Appeal No.
The dependants of the deceased preferred a claim petition before the Tribunal.
9238/2000, the appellant was grievously injured in a motor vehicle accident on 29.5.1993.
5911/2002 S.L.P. Civil No.
In an appeal preferred by the insurer, the High Court held that the insurer cannot challenge the quantum of companypensation granted by the Tribunal and in that view of the matter the appeal was dismissed.
17076/2001, one Rabinder Singh Lehal died in a motor accident.
