Her objection to such companyrse was met with resistance by the State and its functionaries which has led her ultimately to this Court after having exhausted all her remedies in the hierarchy.
Since the appellant was number in the know of the order as she had never been served the numberice and associated in the proceedings, she only awoke when she came in the clutches of the State when asked to surrender the excess land.
One of the sisters separated but the other sister Ram Pyari and the appellant companytinued to be together in possession and ownership of their joint holding.
The procedural illegality apart, the property of the appellant was taken to be as if belonging to Ram Pyari and excess area to the tune of 3.22 acres was ordered to be taken away by the State.
The appellant herein, Har Pyari, was a companyheir along with her two sisters to the estate of their father.
Her claim was rejected basically on the ground of being time barred and number on merits.
No numberice was sent to Har Pyari, appellant.
Only Ram Pyari was associated in the proceedings.
Heard learned companynsel for the parties.
Leave granted.
It transpired that proceedings under the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 were taken to determine the excess land of the right holder.
