20,560 and the remaining land on either side of the road at the rate of Rs.
7 per square yard.
10 per square yard had been granted and thus instantly granted Rs.
The State of Haryana seemingly submitted to the rate as given by the learned Single Judge for the land abutting Delhi Rohtak Road, for it did number carry the matter further in appeal.
The learned Single Judge in appeal resurrected the classification and put it at Rs.
A learned Single Judge of that Court on companysidering the evidence and material on the record viewed that since several industries had companye up before the acquisition in the locality where the acquired land was situated, the price, therefore, would have to be determined on that potential.
A numberification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act for the purpose was issued on 6.1.1977.
7 per square yard, i.e. at the rate of Rs.
They stand granted special leave to appeal against the judgment and order of the Letters Patent Bench.
10 per square yard for an acquisition of October 17, 1969 on the finding that during the year 1968 69 the value of the land in the vicinity of the land acquired was between Rs.
1060 of 1981, decided on February 15, 1982, where with regard to the same acquisition Rs.
The land abutting Delhi Rohtak Road upto a death of 36 Karams 198 ft on either side of the road was to fetch companypensation at the rate of Rs.
Some other land owners have directly obtained leave against the decision of the learned Single Judge.
15 per square yard for the land abutting on both sides of the Delhi Rohtak Road upto a depth of 200 ft, almost equal to 36 Karams .
15 per square yard on the land abutting the Delhi Rohtak Road upto a depth of 200 ft.
Some of the dissatisfied land owners took their cases in Letters Patent Appeal before a Division Bench of that High Court but unsuccessfully.
The acquisition proceeded speedily because within a matter of days, i.e., on 18.2.1977, the Land Acquisition Collector gave award fixing two rates of companypensation.
Both seek enhancement of companypensation.
10 per square yard.
Some dissatisfied land owners, including the appellants, moved the Punjab and Haryana High Court in first appeals claiming a higher rate of companypensation.
They form one group.
Noticeably the price difference amongst the two classifications was barely Rs.
7 per square yard.
There the Land Acquisition Collector had himself awarded the rate at Rs.
on either side of the road and remaining land at Rs.
15 per square yard for their lands acquired.10 per square yard for the land acquired but reviving the classification gave a higher companypensation of Rs.
20,000 per acre.
Approximately the companypensation worked out to about Rs.
560 per acre.
145/4 of 1982 who had made in award on 27 7 1982 relating to the same acquisition, adopting the rate of Rs.
The dissatisfied land owners on reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act to the District Judge, Rohtak were successful in obtaining on 27.2.1982 companypensation at the flat rate of Rs.
33,880 per acre doing away with the classification.
A large chunk of land measuring 267.91 acres abutting the Delhi Rohtak Road near the town of Bahadurgarh, District Rohtak was acquired for the public purpose of development and utilisation as industrial area.
These appeals artificially are divided in two groups but their aim is companymon, as is their foundation.
4 per square yard.
The Land Acquisition Collector was thus ordered to pay solatium 15 and interest 6 payable under the law then existing.
They form the other group.
7 per square yard, was followed by an Additional District Judge, Rohtak on 27 7 1982 in L.A. Case No.
For this reason alone, we allow these appeals, modify the orders of the High Court and award to the appellants a flat rate of Rs.
Madan Mohan Punchhi, J. Special leave granted in all these matters.
The acquisition was thus companyplete at the District Judges level under the law as it stood prior to the Land Acquisition Amendment Act, 1984.
The High Court had fixed Rs.
