Letters dated 7.10.1961 and 18.8.1962 addressed by the appellant tenant to the respondent landlord were companysidered by the authorities in companying to the companyclusion, which they did.
From the Judgment and Order dated 9.2.1982 of the Delhi High Court in S.A.O No.
The respondent is the daughter of the original landlord who had let out the premises to the appellant on 1.10.1961.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
59 of 1979.
1993 of 1982.
Harish N. Salve and A.K.Sanghi for the Respondents.
Relying upon the Rent Note and the appellants letters dated 7.10.1961 and 18.8.1962 addressed to the respondents father and the earlier proceedings between them for eviction of the appellant on the ground of sub letting the premises for companymercial purposes, both the statutory authorities found that the premises which had been let out for residential purposes to the appellant had also been used incidentally for companymercial purposes so as to exclude the application of section 14 1 e read with the Explanation thereto.
K.Ramamurthi, Mrs. Chandan Ramamurthi and A.Krishnamoorthi for the Appellants.
59 of 1979 whereby the High Court, reversing the companycurrent findings of the Additional Rent Controller and the Rent Control Tribunal, allowed the respondent landlords application for eviction of the appellant tenant under section 14 1 e of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 the Act .
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.THOMMEN, J. This appeal arises from the judgment of the Delhi High Court in S.A.O.No.
