946/ were paid by Bhimsha to the accused on January 22, 1959 as per receipts P 2, P 3 and P 4 for Rs.
The accused admittedly issued receipts P 2, P 3 and P 4 for Rs.
106/ and Rs.
The prosecution case is that during the years 1959 and 1960, the accused was posted as Revenue Inspector in Shorapur Tehsil in Gulbarga District.
According to Laxman Prasad, he did number deposit Rs.
Revision filed by the accused was dismissed by the High Court of Mysore.
810/ out of the amount realised from Bhinsha on January 27, 1959 in the treasury and failed to deposit the balance.
Some amount was due from Bhimsha, excise companytractor and in that companynection, Rs.
The accused deposited Rs.
Advi Rao reported the matter to the higher authorities.
130/ in the treasury on November 9, 1960.
730/ , Rs.
Bali Ram Prasad has number companye up in appeal to this Court by special leave.
946/ had been paid to the accused by Bhimsha.
The companyrts below accepted the prosecution case that the accused had received Rs.
6/ were also deposited, but the date of deposit is number clear on the record.
In defence Laxman Prasad, brother of the accused, was examined as witness.
After the companymencement of the inquiry Rs.
946/ from Bhimsha on January 22, 1959 as per receipts P 2, P 3 and P 4 for Rs.
110/ in favour of Bhimsha on January 22, 1959.
130/ were deposited in the treasury by Laxman Prasad D.W. , brother of the accused, on November 9, 1960.
730/ , Rs 106/ and Rs.
810/ only on January 27, 1959.
The accused in his statement under Section 342 CrPC denied all the prosecution allegations.
Inquiry was thereafter started against the accused.
Irrespectively.
It was also found that out of the amount realised by the accused in his capacity as Revenue Inspector, he had deposited a sum of Rs.
110/ respectively.
136/ were thus misappropriated by the accused.
Subsequently, it was brought to the numberice of Advi Rao P.W. 1 who was successor of the accused, that Rs.
