Acoordingly, it directed the appellants to give opportunity of being heard to the respondents and then levy charges.
Consequently declaration was made.
The undisputed facts are that the appellant authority was companystituted under Section of the Act as a development authority.
Leave granted in the Special Leave Petition.
When the respondents filed plans for grant of sanction a demand was made of them to deposit the development fee.
In addition, the High Court also found that the demands for malva charges stacking charges and water charges were violative of principles of natural justice.
WITH A. No.11539 of 1996 and SLP C No.27591 AND A.Nos.9534 35 OF 1995 and 9729 47 OF 1995.
