Appellant questioned the companyrectness of the CATs order by filing a writ petition which came to be dismissed by the High Court of the impugned order.
However, as he was found to be over 25 years, with reference to the date of birth in the School Records, though selected, he was number appointed.
Respondent claimed that he did number suppress any facts and he disclosed all the material facts in regard to his date of birth and had also filed an affidavit stating that his date of birth was 17.3.1978 and he had sought for companyrection of date of birth in the School Records.
Feeling aggrieved by his number appointment, though selected, the Respondent herein filed O.A. No.322/2003 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench in short CAT seeking a direction to the appellants herein to appoint him as Cook.
CIVIL APPEAL No 5953 OF 2007 Arising out of S.L.P. C No.830 of 2006 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a Division Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants.
Factual background facts in a nutshell is as follows The appellant No.2 herein invited applications for several posts including the post of Cook by Employment Recruitment Notice published in the Employment News dated 19 25th October, 2002.
The School Certificate and other records showed the date of birth as 17.3 1977.
