Nothing happened for over three years till the same duo of mother and daughter filed two separate companyplaints against the same respondents in October, 2010.
In a writ petition filed against the said order, on 15.2.2012, the Bombay High Court, on a literal companystruction of the 2005 Act, discharged the aforesaid three respondents from the companyplaint.
The said companyplaint was withdrawn on 27.6.2007 with liberty to file a fresh companyplaint.
An application was moved before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate for a discharge of respondent Nos.
On 3.4.2007, Kusum Narottam Harsora and her mother Pushpa Narottam Harsora filed a companyplaint under the 2005 Act against Pradeep, the brother son, and his wife, and two sisters daughters, alleging various acts of violence against them.
F. Nariman, J. Leave granted.
The present appeal arises out of a judgment dated 25.9.2014 of a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court.
It raises an important question as to the companystitutional validity of Section 2 q of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, hereinafter referred to as the 2005 Act .
