The prosecution case is that on 18.9.1998 the Assistant sub inspector along with Head Constable of police and other police officials were on patrol duty and while so at about 1.30 p.m., they heard shrieks from one room of the house, which was bolted from the inside.
She gave two blows with the said brick on the person of the lady lying on the ground.
The Trial Court on the basis of the evidence accepted the prosecution version and companyvicted the appellants.
One lady was standing near that place and holding a pucca brick, in her hand.
The High Court also reposed companyfidence in the prosecution version.
P.C. the first appellant has given the following written statement On the day of occurrence, I left my house for going to Amritsar.
On the way, I found that I have left my purse at my house.
The second appellant in her 313 statement claimed that she was innocent and was number present at the time of the alleged occurrence.
It is this man and woman who are appellants before us.
After killing her, both man and the woman came out and they proclaimed that they have accomplished their job.
As many as 12 stab wounds have been numbered.
She told the man, the companyaccused that the said lady who was being assaulted was insulting her before others who was his wife.
The murdered lady was the wife of the first appellant.
She also exhorted the man that he should finish her, thereupon the man lifted a khurpa and gave blows with it.
From the gaps in the door of that room, the Assistant sub Inspector peeped inside the room and found that one man was sitting on the chest of the lady, who was made to lie on the ground and he was pressing her neck.
The prosecution advanced its case through the sub inspector who was examined as P.W.2 and Head Constable who was examined as P.W.3 Under Section 313 Cr.
Heard the learned companynsel for the parties.
The police made out a false case against me later on and police men became false witnesses.
M. JOSEPH, J. The appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High companyrt of Punjab Haryana in Criminal Appeal No.103 of 2000 Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by dismissing the appeal filed by the appellants, DEEPAK GUGLANI Date 2018.11.28 110838 IST Reason companyfirming the companyviction and sentence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
