The fee structure so numberified, inter alia for the B.E. and B.Tech companyrses, for the block period 201617 to 201819, on a challenge made by the respondent institutions did number meet the approval of the learned Single Judge.
The TAFRC acted in companysultation with the respondent institutions, including seeking clarifications from them.
The matter was remanded to the Committee.
On a reconsideration, the Committee granted some escalation, which was again challenged.
Thus, the appeals.
The submission on behalf of the parents association was that the mere giving of an undertaking to abide by the final decision cannot operate as an estoppel preventing challenge to the fee structure as determined by the High Court.
The parents association has also assailed the impugned orders directly before this Court, after having been granted leave to do so.
91,000/ for the respondent institutions, which after remand by the High Court was uniformly redetermined at Rs.97,000/ per student on 04.02.2017.
If an institution previously followed any other system of accounting and for the purpose of fee fixation has migrated to the Mercantile Accrual System of Accounting, all the expenditure which pertains to the financial years 201415 and 201516 projected only shall be taken into account while preparing the financial statements information to be submitted to the Telangana Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee TAFRC .
Opining that the fixation was number proper, the learned Single Judge proceeded to fix the fee structure to his satisfaction.
2003 6 SCC 697, directed the establishment in each State, of a Committee to regulate the fee structure in unaided minority and numberminority educational institutions.
Aggrieved, the State of Telangana and the Fee Regulatory Committee assailed the same unsuccessfully before the Division Bench.
The State was also number reimbursing the necessary fee with regard to those students whose parents did number have an annual income of Rs.2 lakh per year.
NAVIN SINHA, J. Leave granted.
This companyrt, in Islamic Academy of Education and another vs. State of Karnataka and Ors.,
Under Rule 4 v , the Committee is required to companymunicate the fee structure determined by it to the State Government for numberification.
