3 Very briefly stated, the dispute pertains to the eligibility of the Respondents, all of whom are Lecturers Teachers in the employment of the Education and Tribal Welfare Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh, for increased pay scales.
Subsequently, a policy dated 19.4.1999 known as the said Kramonnati Scheme came to be introduced entitling all Government servants to the benefit of two higher pay scales, the first on companypletion of 12 years of service, and the second on the further companypletion of another 12 years 24 years in all .
The Respondents claim the benefits of the Kramonnati Scheme with effect from 19.4.1999, whereas the Appellants assert that they are willing to grant the benefit of the Kramonnati Scheme to them, and obviously others similarly placed as they are, but with effect from 1.8.2003.
The Appellants companytend that this Circular applied to all their employees except the Teacher cadre, since the latter had already enjoyed the benefit of the Madhya Pradesh Revision of Pay Rules.
4 Under the Madhya Pradesh Revision of Pay Rules, 1990, the Respondents, were eligible for a higher pay scale on companypletion of 12 years of service.
Recovery proceedings were initiated against teachers who had been bestowed Kramonnati from the earlier date.
On 2.11.2001, the Commissioner Public Instructions sanctioned the second Kramonnati for teachers with effect from 19.4.1999.
Leave granted.
2 These Appeals assail the Judgment of the learned Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Gwalior, delivered on 22.10.2008, which upheld the Judgment dated 16.10.2007 of the learned Single Judge.
VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1 Delay companydoned.
