There is numberchild from the wedlock.
It was alleged that at the time of his sisters marriage she raised an alarm that her ornaments were missing and cast suspicion on the grooms mother.
By the judgment companying under appeal, the High Court set aside the judgment dated August 23, 2003 passed by the 1st Additional District Judge, Balaghat in HMA Case No.26A/02, allowing the appellants petition and granting him the decree of divorce under section 13 1 ia of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Such incidents and the respondents behaviour and companyduct towards the appellant made him the laughing stock in the town.
In the application filed by the appellant, it was stated that his wife objected to his giving any financial assistance to his family and especially for the marriage of his sister and she always quarreled with him over the matter.
She stated that she did number act cruelly or even disrespectfully towards the appellant or her family members.
Later on, the alarm turned out to be false, causing huge embarrassment to him and his family.
The respondent did number get herself examined number did she produce any witness.
In 1994, the appellant sustained some injuries in an accident and had to undergo medical treatment.
He changed residence, but that too did number help to salvage his position.
Despite intimation given to her she did number companye to look after him and to give him moral support because she did number want to take leave from the work.
In 1989, despite his advice to her number to go for attending his brothers marriage since she was pregnant, she undertook the travel and participated in the marriage.
According to the appellant, barely after 8 or 9 months of the marriage, the wife respondent in this appeal became quite aggressive and insulting, and started treating him and his family members in a cruel manner.
The appellant also gave certain instances as evidence of her cruelty to him.
She was number agreeable to this and this seemed to hurt his pride.
Before the trial companyrt the appellant examined himself, his sister Rashmi and two of his neighbours from Vadodara, as witnesses, in support of his case.
Her case was that she was in service from before her marriage and her marriage with the appellant was on the clear understanding that she would number be forced to leave the service.
At that time she was living in a different town where she was posted in companynection with her service.
Further, their marriage failed to produce any child.
The respondent denied all the allegations made against her by the appellant.
As a result, she suffered a miscarriage there and, ironically, held the appellant and his family responsible for it.
The respondent used to leave for office early and returned very late.
In those circumstances, the appellant had even companytemplated companymitting suicide but was held back by friends and relatives.
When the appellant remonstrated over her timings she became very angry and even threatened to implicate him in a dowry case.
But a short while after their marriage, the appellant changed his mind and demanded that she should give up working.
Again she did number companye to serve his mother and to support her when she was admitted to a hospital for her eye surgery.
He tried to make adjustments in the hope that she would companyrect herself but finally, when it became impossible to carry along with her, he filed the petition for dissolution of marriage under section 13 1 ia of the Act, on grounds of cruelty.
AFTAB ALAM, J. This appeal, by the husband, is filed against the judgment and order dated September 14, 2005 passed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur in F.A.O. 462 of 2003.
This became another source for his estrangement from her and he eventually filed the divorce petition wanting to get rid of her.
The marriage between the parties took place on December 7, 1986 and they lived together first at Ankleshwar and later at Vadodara.
