They were accosted by the accused persons.
He came to his house and informed his sister in law.
He was also threatened.
847 of 2005 has been filed by Bindu Ramchandra More A 9 and Sunil Bhimrao Bodke A 11 .
PW 11 informed him about the details of the incident.
Six criminal appeals were filed before the High Court.
Relying on or on the basis of their testimonies before the Court as also the testimonies of other witnesses, the learned Sessions Judge passed a judgment of companyviction against Accused Nos.
However, he did number disclose the details for whatever reason.
Babasaheb, brother of the deceased PW 9 Shivaji Patil who was also companying back from his village along with others found his brother murdered.
He disclosed that PW 16 Vijay that murders of Shivaji Patil and Baburao Patil have been companymitted.
at about 10 Oclock on 21.10.1993, PW 11 Subhash Pandurang Kalke was taking his cart to bring grass from the land of one Rajaram Patil.
In the murder case of the brother of Accused No.
All information given by him to PW 13 was made before the Investigating Officer himself.
The alleged eye witnesses had disclosed all the details about the incident to all whom they had met including another brother of the deceased viz.
9 Bindu More exhorted others to assault but he himself inflicted vital injuries upon Shivaji Patil.
He only named Accused No.
There were two groups in the village one belonging to Sarjerao Patil and the other known as Mahipati Shankarrao Bondre Accused No.
9 was murdered.
A revision application was also filed by Sarjerao Patil against the judgment and order questioning acquittal of Accused Nos.
The accused persons formed a threatening semi circle around them.
The number mention of it by the Investigating Officer in the inquest report is of numberconsequence, in the light of other evidence on record.
4 group.
Before the learned Sessions Judge, a large number of witnesses were examined.
PW 11 asked PW 12 to accompany him.
He asked PW 16 I.O. to companye to the place of occurrence.
He promised to companye later as he was to deliver medicine at his house.
While PW 11 was companying back after loading the grass in his cart, at or near the place of occurrence, Shivaji Patil and Baburao Patil who were companying on a motorcycle overtook him.
PW 13 met the investigating officer at the police station.
4 Mahipati Shankarrao Bondre was the first informant in that case.
9, the deceased Shivaji was granted bail.
The details of incident were narrated to PW 9 by one of the alleged eye witness, viz.,
Accused No.
PWs 11 and 12 were eye witnesses.
The accused allegedly intended to take revenge thereof.
On the fateful day, viz.,
Accused No.
4, 8 and 10.
The First Information Report was lodged at about 2.15 p.m. In the First Information Report, nine persons were named as accused.
837 of 2005 has been filed by Sunil Krishnat More A 3 .
Criminal Appeal No.
Brother of the Accused No.
Accused persons, who were 11 in number, had allegedly been waiting for them.
Criminal Appeal No.
Criminal Appeal No.
4, 8 and 10.
He did number do so.
PWs 11 and 12 seeing them chasing Baburao hid themselves nearby in a sugarcane field.
Appeals were preferred thereagainst by the appellants.
An entry of the said information was made in the station diary.
PW 13 reached the police station at about 12.30 p.m. He allegedly did number furnish the details of the incident.
By reason of the impugned judgment and order, the High Court dismissed the appeals of the appellants before us.
844 846 of 2005 has been filed by Ramesh Baburao Devaskar A 5 , Bajirao Govind Mane A 6 and Bapu Shripati Yadav A 7 .
Before us, four criminal appeals have been filed.
WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.
837, 843 and 847 OF 2005 B. SINHA, J Shivaji Patil, brother of the companyplainant Sarjerao Patil PW 13 and one Baburao Patil were residents of Phulewadi situate in the District Kolhapur, State of Maharashtra.
It, however, reached the Court of the Magistrate only on 25.10.1993.
He was asked to furnish details of the incident.
He started running away from the scene of occurrence.
843 of 2005 has been filed by Hindurao Pandurang Chougule A 1 , Ainuddin Abdul Gavandi A 2 and Criminal Appeal No.
An information received by the officer incharge of a police station for companymission of a companynizable offence must be reduced in writing so as to enable him to start investigation.
He informed him about the incident.
She in turn asked PW 10 Sadashiva to go to the Corporation Office and inform about the incident to the first informant PW 13.
There was bad blood between the two groups.
Baburao Patil intervened.
4 was an M.L.A. He was also a former Minister.
Baburao Patil was found murdered in front of the house of Sou Padma PW 14 .
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 11 and acquitted Accused Nos.
On his way, he met his friend PW 12 Sanjay Laxman Belgaonkar.
PW 16 came to the place of occurrence with PW 13.
He was chased.
In a municipal election which took place between the first informant and one Nagoji Patil, Sarjerao Patil was elected.
Even the place where the murder took place was known to him.
9 companymitted murder of his brother Shivaji Patil and one Baburao Patil.
Bitterness between the two groups came to such a pass that the brother of one Bindu More Accused No.
PW 11, on the basis whereof the First Information Report was lodged at the spot.
