There was a similar matter pending with the High Court and the High Court by a companymon order dated 30.4.2008 directed the respondents to hold the Appeal Medical Boasrd with further direction that the parameters laid down by the High Court in the cases of Ex Sepoy Gopal Singh Dadwal v. Union of India Others 2007 1 SLR 616 and Ex Cfn Sugna Ram Ranoliya v. Union of India Others 132 2006 DLT 544 DB be taken into companysideration.
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 27.3.2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition Civil No.
The claim of the appellant for grant of disability pension was rejected by the companypetent authority.
The Appeal Medical Board opined that the disease of the appellant was neither attributable to number aggravated by the military service because it was companytracted in peace area.
7834 of 2009 which was dismissed by the High Court.
V.K. Kataria Director Pension Dy.
On the recommendations of the Medical Board which assessed the appellants disability as 40, he was invalided out from the service.
838 of 2008 in the High Court of Delhi.
Hence, the present appeal by special leave.
According to the Medical Board the disease of the appellant was neither attributable to number aggravated by the military service.
The appellant filed a Writ Petition Civil No.
The appellant was treated in the Army Hospital at Delhi Cantt.
of Defence, New Delhi New Delhi.
DGAFMS Pens Dir AFMS Pension Office of DGAFMS Office of DGAFMS Min.
Aggrieved thereby, the appellant filed Writ Petition Civil No.
of Defence Min.
