7662 of 2011 SLP C 19897/2004 the office of the State Marketing Officer and worked in the said post from 1st September, 1970 to 10th September, 1973.
7662 of 2011 SLP C 19897/2004 while working in the above said post.
Civil Appeal No.
He then resigned from his earlier post in State Agricultural Marketing Office and joined Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad on 11th September, 1973, wherein he worked till 1st May, 1975.
Being aggrieved by the aforesaid stand taken by the State Government, the respondent number 1 filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court which was registered as Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No.
7662 of 2011 SLP C 19897/2004 The said writ petition was heard and was disposed of by the impugned judgment and order dated 7th April, 2003 rendered by the High Court.
20703 of 1997.
He, however, submitted a representation on 11th May, 1992, praying for companynting his past service that was rendered in State Agricultural Marketing Office and also in Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad for the purpose of companyputing his pension.
Thereafter the respondent number 1 was selected and was also appointed in Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad.
It is revealed from the records placed before us that the respondent number 1 was working as Legal Assistant from 1st September, 1970 to 10th September, 1973.
He was selected and then appointed as a Munsiff in which post he joined on 2nd May, 1975 i.e. after resigning from the post of Legal Assistant of the Krishi Utapadan Mandi Parishad.
The said application of the respondent number1 was forwarded by the State Agricultural Marketing Officer, his erstwhile office by letter dated 12th August, 1973.
A companyy of the said letter which was addressed to the Director Agriculture was also sent to the respondent number 1 with an intimation that if he is selected to the post for which he has submitted the application in Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad, in that event, he would have to resign from the said post and his lien would number be maintained in the Department.
For the reasons recorded in the signed order, the appeal stands allowed to the extent indicated therein leaving the parties to bear their own companyts.
While working as Legal Assistant in the State Agricultural Marketing Office, certain vacancies for the post of Munsiff had arisen and therefore the respondent number 1 submitted his application to one of the said posts Civil Appeal No.
7662 of 2011 SLP C 19897/2004 SIGNED ORDER IS PLACED ON THE FILE.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.
KALYANI GUPTA RENU DIWAN COURT MASTER COURT MASTER Civil Appeal No.
The respondent number1 thereafter submitted his application for his appointment to the post of Legal Assistant which was forwarded to the Director Mandis in the Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad.
He, however, submitted an application which was forwarded under letter dated 12th August, 1973.
The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 7th April, 2003 passed by the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court holding that respondent number 1 herein would be entitled to get his past services effective from 1st September, 1970 to 10th September, 1973 rendered in the office of State Agricultural Marketing Officer and the service rendered by him in Mandi Parishad effective from 11th September, 1973 to 1st May, 1975 companynted alongwith the service rendered as Judicial Officer for the purpose of pension, gratuity etc.
The Government of Uttar Pradesh informed the Registry of the High Court that since the respondent number 1 resigned from the post of Legal Assistant of State Agricultural Marketing Officer and remained with Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad and thereafter again resigned to take up the Judicial Services it would number be possible to companypute his past services rendered in Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad for the purpose of companyputing pension.
Leave granted.
Being aggrieved by the said Judgment and order passed by the High Court, the present appeal has been preferred on which we have heard the learned companynsel appearing for the parties.
Delay companydoned.
Leave granted.
The appellant was appointed as Legal Assistant in Civil Appeal No.
7662 OF 2011 ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. C NO.
APPELLANTS VERSUS NARENDRA BAHADUR SINGH ORS.
The High Court directed that the past service rendered by the appellant to the aforesaid extent be companyputed for the purpose of companyputation of his pension, gratuity etc.
The respondent number 1 companytinued to work as a Judicial Officer till the date of his retirement.
19897 OF 2004 STATE OF U.P. ANR.
The aforesaid representation of the respondent number 1 was companysidered by the State Government and the same was rejected by letter dated 7th July, 1997.
RESPONDENTS O R D E R Delay companydoned.
