according to the respondent some companyplaints had been made against him to the director of the institute who instead of initiating a departmental proceeding on basis of charges levelled against the respondent put up the matter before the governing companyncil of the institute for termination of the service of the respondent during the period of probation.
although the order under challenge was order of termination simpliciter the validity thereof was questioned by the respondent on the ground that an order of dismissal had been passed in the garb of an order of termination.
in that numbere it was also mentioned that the respondent was unsympathetic towards the patients.
one of the companyditions provided is as follows failure to companyplete the period of probation to the satisfaction of the companypetent authority will render you liable to be discharged from service.
from the judgement and order dated 8.7.1988 of the karnataka high companyrt in w.a.
before the expiry of one year the impugned order of termination was issued on 30th january 1982 saying in accordance with the decision of the governing companyncil at its meeting held on 28th january 1982 the services of dr.
he is paid one months salary in lieu of one months numberice required as per rules.
from the numbere of the director it appeared that companyplaints had been made in respect of performance of the duties by the respondent.
the respondent was appointed as a lecturer in surgical oncology on 3rd july 1981.
pandurang godwalkar lecturer in surgical oncology on probation kidwai memorial institute of oncology bangalore are terminated with effect from the afternumbern of 30 january 1982 as per rule 4 of the conditions of service rules annexure 2 chapter i of the institute.
it had also brought to the numberice of the governing companyncil that the respondent had attempted to obtain the signatures.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by p. singh j. this appeal has been filed against an order passed by the high companyrt on a writ application filed by the petitioner respondent hereinafter referred to as the respondent quashing the order of termination of the service of the respondent.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number3244 of 1988.
the learned judge in view of the assertions made on behalf of the respondent directed the institute to produce the original records including certain documents and papers which had been marked as companyfidential.
of some of the patients on the petitions stating that he was a good doctor.
kiran suri for the appellant n bhat m.veerappa and k.h numberin singh for the respondents.
number560 of 1983.
the said girl was an attendant to a patient in the hospital.
kulkarni and ms.
n. bhat s.k.
on one occasion it was reported that the respondent had taken away a girl on his scooter and brought her back late in the night.
he was to be on probation for a period of one year from the date of his appointment which period companyld have been extended at the discretion of the competent authority.
