From the impugned judgment we find that the appellant did number dispute the fact that his wife met with an homicidal death.
Tulsi Singh, the appellant before us, was arraigned before the Special Court Ferozepur for the murder of his wife Chhinder Kaur.
The trial ended in an order of companyviction and sentence recorded against the appellant under Section 302 I.P.C. and aggrieved thereby he has filed the instant appeal.
P.C. To ascertain whether the above companytention is borne by the record or number we have carefully looked into the evidence of the Magistrate as also the companyfession Ext.
He, however, companytended that he was number responsible for the murder, number did he make any voluntary companyfession in respect thereof as alleged by the prosecution.
In absence of any eye witness to the murder, the prosecution rested its case upon the companyfession made by the appellant before a Judicial Magistrate and the evidence of the doctor who held post mortem examination upon the deceased and opined that her death was homicidal.
