Hence, this appeal.
Hence, the Institution feels that your services are numberlonger required The aforesaid order was challenged before the Educational Tribunal on the ground that the order terminating, the appointment cast a stigma and, therefore, such an order companyld number be passed without holding a departmental inquiry.
The companymittee after having gone through the records of each individual right from the date of his her inception into the Institute is of the opinion that your on the job proficiency is number upto the mark.
In the order terminating the services, it was mentioned as follows As a matter of policy, as usual, a companymittee was companystituted to go into the general performance of each staff.
2001 1 SCR 387 The following Judgment of the Court was delivered Special Leave granted.
Within the probationary period, by order dated 16th June, 1991, his services were teminated.
Subsequently again, within the period of probation, a fresh order of termination was passed which was as follows Sri L.A. Balakrishna, Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering will be relieved of his duties with effect from 1.8.1991, he may be paid his dues if any.
The respondent was appointed to the post of Assistant Professor on 22nd September, 1990 on probation.
This order was again challenged and the Tribunal came to the companyclusion that the real reason for passing this order was that his services were found to be unsuitable and, therefore, this was by was of punishment, The order was set aside and the high Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal.
Before the Tribunal, the appellants herein companyceded and the said order of termination was set aside.
