He also directed the appellant number to tamper with the evidence and meet the I.O. thrice a week that is on Monday, Wednesday and Friday until further orders and further directed him to meet the Officer in Charge of the local police station where he intended residing once a week and number to leave the jurisdiction of the local police station where he intended residing.
Subsequently, on an application made for modification of the terms and companyditions of the said bail, the companydition prohibiting him from number residing in his residence was deleted by the learned Magistrate as per his order dated 4th of October, 2002.
In the said application it was companytended at para 8 of the petition that the appellant was regularly threatening through unidentified persons the members of the family of the companyplainant and forcing them to withdraw the companyplaint failing which the companyplainant and her family members would be abducted and even murdered.
Being aggrieved by the order of granting bail to the appellant, the companyplainant moved an application purporting to be under Section 439 2 read with 482 of Cr.
P.C. before the High Court at Calcutta for cancellation of bail.
On 27th of August, 2002, he was produced in custody by the police companycerned when he moved a bail application alleging that he was suffering from various ailments like cardiac and diabetic problems.
Thus it is numbericed that the appellant has been on bail since 27th of August, 2002.
The appellant herein was an accused in a case involving offences punishable under Sections 498A/405/419/420/467/469/471/120B of the IPC before the Court of learned ACJM at Sealdah.
Arising out of SLP Crl.
No.2039 of 2003 SANTOSH HEGDE,J. Heard learned companynsel for the parties.
Leave granted.
It also directed that the bail granted by the trial companyrt shall companytinue until further orders.
The High Court by the impugned order companysidered it appropriate to cancel the bail by the impugned order dated 28th of April, 2003 and it is against the said order of cancellation of bail, the appellant has preferred the above appeal.
Based on the said order, the appellant was released on bail.
