35,210 21 as also that of the appellant for Rs.
10.000/ against the Union of India for balance of price of ice supplied by the plaintiff etc.
The award which followed was challenged by the appellant and was set aside by a single Judge of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court.
3,226 79.
The appellant then instituted the suit referred to above.
There was a reference to arbitration Under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act in terms of an arbitration clause companytained in the companytract.
A single Judge of the High Court rejected an application Under Section 34 of the Act preferred by the respondent but this order was set aside by the appellate Bench It appears that numberproper steps were taken in the prosecution of appeal to this Court by special leave and on his own application one Mr. Bansi Lal Sharma was allowed to be impleaded as appellant No.
The dispute between the parties arose out of a companytract for supply of ice by the appellant to the Union of India and the latter made a claim against the plaintiff for failure to supply the ice in terms of the companytract and damages suffered as a result thereof.
2 At the hearing of the appeal on August 25, 1969 the claim of the Union of India for Rs.
10,000/ were by agreement of parties referred to the sole arbitration of Mr. Bishan Narain, an advocate of this Court.
35,210 21 from the plaintiff or its partners and for a decree for Rs.
K. Mitter, J. This appeal is by special leave granted by this Court from an appellate judgment and order of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir staying a suit filed by the Lakshmi Ice Factory for a declaration that the Union of India was number entitled to recover Rs.
