Both the respondents appeared before the Rent Controller and filed separate applications for leave to defend.
1, Jai Devi is his tenant but as Respondent No.2, her husband, has been claiming that he and number his wife is the tenant of the remises the eviction petition is filed against both of them to avoid any technical objection.
They have raised a dispute that Respondent No.2 is the tenant and number Respondent No.1.
The Rent Controller, therefore, granted leave to both the respondents to defend the eviction petition.
379 of 1997 is questioned in this appeal.
The High Court dismissed the revision application filed by the landlord against the order passed by the Rent Controller granting leave to the respondents to defend the eviction petition.
NANVATI, J. The companyrectness of the judgment of the Delhi High Court in Civil Revision Application No.
