When a Writ Petition was filed challenging the companyrectness of the order of dismissal, the High Court interfered with the order of dismissal on the ground that the acts companyplained of were sheer mistakes or errors on the part of the respondent herein and for that numberpunishment companyld be attributed to the respondent.
The High Court by the impugned order modified the punishment by way of stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect and quashed the order of dismissal from service awarded to the respondent herein.
We have been taken through the charges framed against the respondent herein and also the Enquiry Report submitted by the Enquiry Officer and the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority and also the order passed in the Claim Petition.
On a companysideration of the entire materials placed before the authorities, they came to the companyclusion that the order of dismissal would meet the ends of justice.
Writ Petition No.1505/1996 allowing the Writ Petition filed by the respondent herein.
The High Court also ordered reinstatement with all pecuniary and companysequential service benefits.
This appeal is directed against the judgment passed by the High Court of Allahabad in Civil Misc.
The charges No.1,2,3 and 5 have been proved beyond any doubt.
O R D E R Heard the learned companynsel appearing on behalf of the appellants and the respondents.
Five charges were framed against the respondent herein.
Charge No.4 has number been proved.
The charges are very serious in nature.
