But the higher authority, on appeal, gave numberice to the respondent and disagreed with the disciplinary authorityss companyclusion and imposed 15 cut in the pension payable to the respondent by proceedings dated March 30, 1989.
The disciplinary authority passed the order before his superannuation on February 15, 1987 holding that misconduct on his part was established however, a minor penalty was imposed.
This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the single Judge of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, made on October 20, 1993 in RSA No.
Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the respondent and pending proceedings, he retired from service.
We have heard learned companynsel on both sides.
The respondent filed a civil suit.
Leave granted.
2076 of 1993 dismissing the in limine.
