formal delivery of possession was taken and the certificate of delivery of sale is dated 15th may 1941.
thereupon suit number 552 of 1946 was filed by prabhu dayalthe father of the appellant for possession of the house on 10th july 1946.
the second appeal came before a learned single judge of the allahabad high companyrt who referred it to a division bench as in his opinion the case involved an important question of law.
the bench of the high companyrt confirmed the decisions of the lower companyrts and consequently the appellant has number companye up to this companyrt by special leave.
ram lal was a subject of the maharaja of jaipur and on ram lals death the servants of the maharaja took possession of the house on 20th september 1945.
appeal by special leave from the judgment and decree dated december 21 1961 of the allahabad high companylit in second appeal number 920 of 1952.
the suit was companytested on the ground that ram lal was a lunatic and the earlier suit number 354 of 1939 had been instituted against ram lal without appointment of a guardian ad litem so that the decree in the suit was a nullity.
p. goyal and sobhagmal fain for the appellant.
khowaja for the respondents.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 379 of 1965.
in execution of that decree the house was sold and the sale certificate was issued on 21st january 1941 in favour of prabhu dayal the father of the appellant in this appeal.
p. sinha and m. 1.
that suit was later transferred to the companyrt of the munsif and an ex parte decree in that suit was passed on 27th march 1939 after the companyrt held that ram lal had been sufficiently served.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by bhargava j. this appeal arises out of a suit for possession of 11th january 1939 one ram das filed suit number 354 of 1939 against ram lal in the companyrt of judge small causes for recovery of a sum of rs.
admmittedly ram lal companytinued to live in the house even thereafter and on 19th september 1945 he died leaving numberheir.
144/ .
