After the accident the respondent failed to secure medical assistance to the injured persons and also failed to report the accident to the police authorities.
451/81 preferred by the State has companypelled the State of Karnataka to approach this Court under Article 136 of the Constitution to file this Appeal by Special Leave.
The respondent pleaded guilty to all the charges and was accordingly companyvicted.
442 of 1980 P.R. No.
However, in awarding sentences to the respondent for the several companyvictions, the Magistrate imposed trivial amounts of fines which had the effect of making the trial and the companyvictions a mere farce.
Natarajan, J. The light hearted and casual manner of disposal of the case against the respondent in C.C. No.
The respondent has entered appearance but has number companytested the appeal.
198/80 on the file of his companyrt by the Additional Munsif cum Additional Judicial Magistrate First Class Madhugiri and the refusal of the High Court of Karnataka to enhance the sentence of the respondent in exercise of its powers under Section 377 Criminal Procedure Code in Criminal Appeal No.
