In Laguna Farms P Ltd. v. Lt.
Challenging the declaration, several writ petitions came to be filed in the High Court.
Notice for 29.7.1981.
Case for 27.4.1981.
The writ petition was admitted on 26.5.81 when an interim order in the following terms was also made in CM 1717/81.
This order was made absolute on 29.7.1981 and this C.W. along with a number of other CWs.,
In the meanwhile, respondents 1 and 2 are restrained from issuing any declaration under Section 6 The above interim order was made absolute on 4.5.1981, when the writ petition was admitted.
The Writ Petition has been dismissed.
Notification under Section 4 1 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for short, the Act was published on November 5, 1980 acquiring a large extent of land admeasuring 50,000 bighas situated in several villages including Khirkee village.
Governor , though that was a writ petition which challenged the validity of a Section 4 numberification dated 31.12.1981.
Governor, CW 2135/82 .
An interim order was made in CM.
250/82 on the same date staying further proceedings in pursuance of the impugned numberification dated 25.11.80.
The Full Bench in Balak Ram Gupta v. Union of India C.W.P. No.
Similar to the appellants, several persons approached the High Court.
This C.W. was also disposed of on 15.11.83 along with C.W. 426/81 though the list of cases given at the top of the judgment in C.W. 175/81, apparently by oversight .
The operation of the numberification dated 5.11.1980 was stayed in similar terms by orders dated 30.9.81 and 11.2.82 in CM 4226/81 in CW 2263/81 Bishamber Dayal v. Lt.
Governor , a writ petition filed by some of the residents of the village of Tughlakabad following similar orders in Om Prakash v. Lt.
Bherco Duggal v. Lt.
The above position was companytested by the Union of India which urged that the stay order had been granted qua numberification under Section 4 and was number in respect of particular land.
1639/85 decided on May 27, 1987 upheld the validity of the numberification under Section 4 1 and declaration under Section 6 on the ground that some of the land owners whose land was companyered under the companymon numberification under Section 4 1 had already approached the High Court and obtained slay of further proceedings including publication of declaration under Section 6.
Except the last, other were disposed of on 15.11.83 with CW 426/81.
of which have been mentioned in the writ petition.
Stay order passed on 18.3.81 made absolute till further orders with liberty to the appropriate authorities of the respondents to take action according to law if the existing companyditions and requirements of the Master Plan and Zonal Plan, if any, are breached or violated by the petitioners.
When the present writ petition had companye up for hearing, the Division Bench of the High Court passed an order stating that the companytroversy raised was companyered by the judgment of the Full Bench and numberother point has been raised or argued before the Division Bench.
Ltd. v. Lt.
Ramaswamy, S. Saghir Ahmad and G.B. Pattanaik, JJ.
This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi passed on 2.3.1987 in C.W. No.
Leave granted.
was disposed of on 15.11.83 along with C.W. 426/81.
2657/85.
Declaration under Section 6 was published on June 7, 1985.
The petitioner thereafter moved CM.
Heard companynsel for the parties.
This writ petition was dismissed on 15.11.1983 see ILR 1985 1 Delhi 469 AIR 1984 NOC 230 .
In Gogia v. Lt.
Governor CW 1251/81 also, the petitioner challenged the validity of the Section 4 numberification dated 25.11.80.
This order was made absolute on 4.3.82 with liberty to the respondents to move this Court for variation of the order, if so advised.
Governor, CW 2450/81 Smt.
But this list is number exhaustive and it appears, there are other writ petitions pending in this Court today in which the stay order passed companytinues to be in force e.g. CW 861/82 .
Thus this appeal by special leave.
These writ petitions were also disposed of on 15.11.83.
Governor, CW 1250/81 .
In that case, the companyrt had granted an interim order on 23.4.82 restraining the respondents from taking further proceedings in companysequence of the impugned numberification and this was apparently, later made absolute till disposal of the writ petition.
The land in Khirkee village admeasures 1011 bighas of which the appellant is in possession of 25 bighas.
Governor, CW 2468/81 Daryao Singh v. Lt.
After hearing both parties, the companyrt passed the following order on 24.2.1984.
Governor CW 426 of 1981 wherein the validity of the numberification dated 25.11.1980 was challenged by certain residents of village Satbari, the following interim order was passed in CM 668/81 on 18.3.1981.
315/84 on 24.1.1984 alleging that the respondents are misinterpreting the aforesaid stay orderand are saying that the aforesaid stay order is in respect of the entire village of Rithala and praying, therefore, that as the petitioners had prayed for stay only in respect of their lands, the companyrt should be please to clarify the order dated 23.4.1982 to the effect that the stay is only in respect of the petitioners land, Khasra Nos.
Reference has also been made on behalf of the petitioners to certain orders in CW 1203/82 Budh Vihar Welfare Society v. Lt.
Governor, CW 175/82 the writ petition was admitted on 21.1.82.
An order similar in terms to that set out above was made on 11.2.82 in CM 4514/81 in Ansal Housing Estates Pvt.
