there is number numberdispute about the amount of loss determined by the companyrt as suffered by the plaintiffs.
30 a. m. on october 1 1949 reached chandanpur station at 3.15 a. m. the same night the train having stopped for 14 minutes at the howrah burdwan link for the home signal at 2.
1958 of the punjab high companyrt circuit bench delhi in civil regular first appeal number 32 d of 1953.
of the companysignment certain articles were number delivered to m s. udho ram sons the plaintiffs in whose favour the railway receipt had been endorsed by the companysigner.
05 a. m. and that the railway protection police escorted the train.
m s. radha ram sohan lal of calcutta companysigned certain goods to self at delhi.
may 1.
appeal from the judgment and decree dated april 23.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 581 of 60.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by raghubar dayal j. this appeal on certificate granted by the punjab high companyrt arises in the following circumstances.
naunit lal and d. gupta for the appellant gurbachan singh and harbans singh for the respondent.
the trial companyrt found that the railway wagon in which the consignment was loaded bad been thereafter properly riveted and sealed at howrah that the seals and rivet of one door of the wagon were found open when the train which left howrah at 1.
having failed to receive the compensation for the loss suffered on account of the articles number delivered the suit giving rise to this appeal was instituted.
