There were high ranking police officials representing the Government.
10 of the Act refered the matter to the Advisory Board.
During the watch kept by the Inspector, Vigilance Cell, Civil Supplies Department, Nellore on the night of November 4, 1987 a lorry bearing No.
When the investigation of that case was proceeding, Additional Superintendent of Police, Nellore sent proposals to the District Magistrate for detaining the respondent under the Act.
The driver suddenly stopped the lorry, but the persons in the vehicle took the heals jumping out there from and disappeared in the bushes.
MDN 8505 carrying 125 bags of paddy was spotted when it was trying to go to Tamil Nadu avoiding check post.
The paddy and the lorry were seized by the Inspector.
From the interrogation of the driver, it was established that on November 4, 1987, the respondent along with two others were in the cabin of the lorry and they were responsible for transporting paddy to Tamil Nadu.
We have perused the grounds of detention and other companynected papers.
The respondent was identified by the Inspector of Police and his staff in the head lights of the jeep in which they were chasing.
PG NO 622 From the judgment and Order dated 14.4.1988 of the Andhra Pradesh in W.P. No.
The driver of the vehicle was apprehended after a hot chase, but number the respondent.
On January 4, 1988, the State Government approved the detention.
The Advisory Board after hearing those officers and the detenu made an order We have heard the detenu, who has been produced before us and companysidered his written representation.
On January 11, 1988 the State Government acting under sec.
The detenu challenged the validity of the order of detention before the High Court.
S.P. Vigilance , Hyderabad, Sri N. Chandramouli, D.S.P. Vigilance , Nellore and Sri Nageswara Rao, Incharge Joint Collector, Nellore District.
We have also heard Sri V. Appa Rao, I.G.P. Spl , Vigilance, Sri C.R. Naidu, Addl.
A criminal case was registered against the driver under the Essential Commodities Act and the Andhra Pradesh Rice Procurement Levy Order, 1984.
PG NO 623 On January 27, 1988, the detenu submitted a representation through the Superintendent, Central Prison where he was detained to the Chairman of the Advisory Board and to the Chief Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh and also to the detaining authority.
The lorry was chased by the Inspector of Police and his staff.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Petition for Special Leave to Appeal Crl No 1783/1988.
Briefly stated the facts are these The respondent was said to have smuggled paddy from Andhra Pradesh to Tamil Nadu.
The District Magistrate passed an order dated December 24, 1987 directing the detention of the respondent.
The Government forwarded the representation to the Advisory Board.
Subba Rao for the Respondent.
On January 29, 1988, the Advisory Board met and heard the detenu and the officers on behalf of the Government.
For these reasons.
4454 of 1988 whereby the order of detention passed against the respondent under the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980 The Act was quashed.
Ramaswamy, Additional Solicitor General and T.V.S.N. Chari for the Petitioners.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment dated April 14, 1988 of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in writ petition No.
4454 of 1988.
