Presently, the appellant was facing trial in eight cases which is in companyplete violation of the provisions of Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962 in short the Extradition Act .
Appellant had filed a writ petition as afore noted in the Delhi High Court which came to be disposed of by the impugned order.
Background facts sans unnecessary details are as follows Appellant had filed a Writ Petition before the Delhi High Court taking the stand that he was being tried in several cases companytrary to the extradition decree.
No.54 of 2005 before this Court which was withdrawn by him in order to enable him to move appropriate High Court for redressal of his grievances, if any.
282 of 2006 ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
He had also pleaded that he was being kept in solitary companyfinement without proper medical aid in the Central Jail in the State of U.P. It is to be numbered that the appellant had filed the Writ Petition Crl.
Arising out of SLP Crl.
Appellant calls in question legality of the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court disposing of the Writ Petition W.P. Crl.
Appellant came to India by way of extradition from Singapore.
