The first application is dated May 23, 1957, and is addressed to the Provincial Iron and Steel Controller, Kanpur, through the District Magistrate, Deoria.
He further stated that the requirements were number available at Deoria and as such the application should be companysidered and forwarded to the Controller for companysideration and orders.
Only two applications are in the printed record.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated August 24, 1962 of the Allahabad High Court in Government Appeal No.
It appears that this application was forwarded, duly recommended, by the District Supply Officer.
In this application he again stated that he was a political sufferer and he was companystructing a public temple and dharamshala for which he required certain quantities of iron.
He made another application dated September 7, 1957.
Deoria, and ultimately a permit was given to him by the Controller.
The permits were obtained on three applications made by the respondent.
On January 2, 1958, the accused made another application Ex.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
This application was also recommended and forwarded and ultimately a permit was given to him.
Ka 9 not available in the printed record and a permit was given to him by the District Supply Officer himself.
60 of 1963.
He further stated that the requirements were number available at Deoria and as such the application should be forwarded to the Controller.
1379 of 1962.
He is alleged to have purchased these articles on the basis of the above permits between July 1957 and March 1958.
P. Goyal, for the respondent.
C. Misra and O.P. Rana, for the appellant.
The respondent obtained permits under the Iron and Steel Control Order, 1956 hereinafter referred to as the Control Order for about 28 tons of iron, including 6 tons of rods, 151/2 tons of joints and 2 tons of G.C. Sheets.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Sikri, J. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing the appeal of the State against the judgment of the Sessions Judge allowing the appeal of the respondent and acquitting him.
In this application the respondent stated that he was a political sufferer and he was companystructing a public temple for which he required five tons of M.S. Round and eight tons of Girder.
