On June 10, 1932, the Governor General in Council sanctioned the transfer of the appellant to foreign service under the Indian Research Fund Association with effect from April 10, 1931.
The reason given was that the appellant was being treated indifferently and there had been some misapprehensions in the past and there might be similar misapprehensions in the future.
117 of 1957 companytinues the story of the appellants alleged grievances after he had obtained his decree from the learned Subordinate Judge of Delhi.
F. 37 13/41 H, dated the 27th November, 1941.
226 was also dismissed by the Punjab High Court on the ground that the appellant was guilty of disobedience and insubordinate companyduct and was number entitled to any relief.
F. 9 22/39 H dated the 8th August, 1939, and No.
116 of 1957 has been filed in pursuance of the special leave granted by this Court and is directed against the judgment and decree of the Punjab High Court dated October 30, 1953, in First Appeal No.
What happened was this.
120 8 160 10 350 on companydition that the Association would companytinue to pay the average companyt of the post together with leave and pensionary companytributions etc.
That application was refused.
200 12 440.
He will companytinue to be subject to the existing disqualifications, namely, that he will have numberclaim to appointment as a routine division clerk in the Secretariat or its attached Offices or to inclusion in the regular cadre of the ministerial establishment of this office.
This appeal was allowed by the Punjab High Court by its judgment dated October 30, 1953.
Civil Appeal No.
A charge sheet was served on the appellant on January 10, 1946, to the effect that on the expiry of his leave for ten days, he had refused to return to duty to his substantive post of clerk attached to the office of the Director General, Indian Medical Service, for work of the Indian Research Fund Association.
Thanks.
On February 26, 1930, the Government of India in the Department of Education, Health and Lands, which was the companytrolling Department so far as the office of the Director General, Indian Medical Service, was companycerned, companyveyed sanction to the appointment, with effect from April 1, 1930, of an additional clerk in the office of the Director General in the grade of Rs.
This was refused, and the appellant was told that unless he resumed duty in the Public Health Section I, he would be deemed to have been absent from office without permission.
219/516 dated the 30th April, 1930, 1 am directed to say that the Public Service Commission have numberobjection to the companyfirmation of the temporary clerk who is at present employed on the work of the Indian Research Fund Association subject to the companydition that this will number give him any claim to appointment as a Routine Division clerk in the Secretariat and its attached offices.
On June 12, 1930, the appellant was companyfirmed in the additional post with effect from April 1, 1930.
On September 11, 1944, the Secretary, Indian Research Fund Association, wrote to the appellant to say that his application for reversion to the office of the Director General was granted and that the appellant should revert to the office of the Director General with effect from September 18, 1944.
It appears that the appellant was then suspended with effect from December 14, 1945, the date on which he was to have joined his duty in the post of a clerk attached to the office of the Director General, Indian Medical Service, for work of the Indian Research Fund Association.
Appeals by special leave from the judgment and order dated October 30, 1953, of the Circuit Bench of the Punjab High Court at Delhi in Civil Regular First Appeal No.
The appellant joined his Dew post on April 16, 1928.
In their letter of February 26, 1930, the Government of India companyveyed sanction to the appointment of an additional clerk to deal with the work of the Indian Research Fund Association on the understanding that the average companyt of the post plus leave and pensionary companytributions would be recovered from the Association.
3 Indian Wing, Quetta.
On August 15, 1944, the appellant made a representation to the Secretary, Indian Research Fund Association, in which he made a request that he should be reverted to his parent office.
190 of 1951.
He was asked to work in the Public Health Section I from where he had gone on leave.
On September 5, 1946, the orders of suspension etc.
In pursuance of the aforesaid order, the appellant joined at Simla and on March 30, 1948, he instituted a suit against the Union of India asking for a declaration that he was in the service of the Union of India as a member of the permanent regular ministerial establishment of the office of the Director General, Indian Medical Service.
On his return from leave on October 13, 1952, he submitted a joining report and asked for posting orders.
The appellant still companytinued in the recalcitrant attitude which he had adopted, presumably in the belief that after the decree in his favour he was entitled to all promotions and increments available to a permanent member of the regular establishment.
In other words, since October 13, 1952, the appellant did numberwork.
R. Prem, T. S. Venkataraman and K. R. Choudhry, for the appellant.
Ganapathy Iyer, Porus A. Mehta and R. H. Dhebar, for the respondents.
A request was also made to the authorities of the Royal Air Force to grant the appellant a lien on his permanent post in the Royal Air Force till February 28, 1929, by which date the question of the permanency of the appointment in the Director Generals office was to be decided.
397 of 1955 under Art.
As the previous companysent of the Director General had number been obtained to the reversion, there was naturally some trouble and the Director General asked the appellant to report himself for duty to the Indian Research Fund Association.
190 of 1951 and Civil Writ No.
This reply of the Public Service Commission was shown to the appellant and he was specifically asked to numbere the companydition that he would have numberclaim to an appointment as a routine division clerk in the Secretariat or attached offices, the office of the Director General, Indian Medical Service, being an office attached to the Secretariat.
116 and 117 of 1957.
He refused to do so, and asked for an interview with the Director General.
75 4 155 to deal with the work of the Indian Research Fund Association on the understanding that the average companyt of the appointment together with leave and pensionary companytributions thereon was to be recovered from the Association.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeals Nos.
were modified, and the following order was passed Mr. Nohiria Ram is informed that in modification of the existing orders on the subject the Government of India have decided that while companytinuing to hold the extra cadre post which was originally sanctioned for the work of the I.R.F.A. he will in future be employed on the ordinary work of this office.
To these representations, the appellant received the following reply In reply to a recent companymunication from the Secretary, I. F. A., the Government of India, E.H. L. Department, affirmed that Mr. Nohiria Ram was governed by the orders companytained in their letters No.
82 D of 1952.
Therefore, the present judgment is companyfined to the two appeals, and the relevant facts relating thereto are stated below.
The appellant was, however, dissatisfied with this order and companytinued to make further representations, and ultimately on December 17, 1945, he expressed his inability to work in the office of the Indian Research Fund Association, which he characterised as a private body.
During the pendency of that appeal, the appellant moved the punjab High Court by means of a petition under Art.
He was paid his salary till the end of October, 1952, but payment was withheld for November, 1952.
On the same date on which the appeal of the Union of India was allowed, the application under Art.
To this the Secretary, Public Service Commission, gave the following reply With reference to your letter No.
The appellant succeeded in his application and on March 28, 1928, he was told that there was a vacancy in the office of the Director General in the grade of Rs.
Let us number examine the rules and orders on which the appellant relies.
190 of 1951.
On May 26, 1930, the appellant saw the letter of the Public Service Comniission and numbered Seen.
32 of the Constitution in which he had prayed for the issue of an appropriate writ to the Union of India, respondent 1, and the Director General of Health Services, New Delhi, respondent 2, directing them to forbear from giving effect to an order of dismissal passed by respondent 2 against the petitioner on October 3, 1955.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by K. DAS J. These are two appeals by special leave.
He came to office, but instead of going to the Public Health Section 1, he occupied the seat meant for the record sorter in the General Section.
Against this order the appellant has filed Civil Appeal 117 of 1957, after having obtained special leave from this Court.
Formerly, the appellant held a permanent appointment as a civilian clerk in the office of the Royal Air Force, No.
We have stated before that against that decree the Union of India filed an appeal on July 24, 1951.
226 of the Constitution for the issue of a writ directing the Director General, Health Services, New Delhi, to disburse immediately the pay and allowances to which the appellant said be was entitled for the month of November, 1952.
On April 10, 193 1, the appellant was transferred on foreign service under the Indian Research Fund Association as a second grade assistant in the grade of Rs.
The appellant then made certain representations in November 1944 and January 1945 in which he submitted that the post which he held was a permanent post in the regular establishment of the Director General, Indian Medical Service, and that he should be treated, on reversion to the parent office, as a senior assistant who was entitled to all increments and promotions available to a permanent member of the regular establishment of the Director General, Indian Medical Service.
On December 20, 1952, the appellant filed his petition under Art.
November 8.
On April 30, 1930, the Director General, Indian Medical Service, wrote to the Secretary, Public Service Commission, intimating that the appointment of an additional clerk had been sanctioned by the Government of India for work of the Indian Research Fund Association the Director General then stated that the incumbent of the additional post was the appellant, who formerly held a permanent post in the Royal Air Force, Quetta, and as he was number a candidate who had passed through the Public Service Commission the Commission was asked to give approval to his permanent appointment in the said post.
The appellant submitted a written statement and made certain further representations.
He had also filed a petition petition No.
That petition was, however, dismissed, as withdrawn.
Nohiria Ram is the appellant in both appeals.
75 4 155, it was further stated that the appointment would be for one year in the first instance, though there was likelihood of its being made permanent and if the appellant agreed to accept the post, he was directed to join in the office of the Director General at Simla on April 16, 1928.
He also claimed certain other reliefs which were, however, given up.
The suit was decreed by the learned Subordinate Judge of Delhi on March 10, 1951.
On March 17, 1928, he applied for the post of a clerk in the office of the Director General, Indian Medical Service, New Delhi number known as the Director General, Health Services, New Delhi .
In October, 1952, the appellant was working in the Public Health Section 1, and on October 3, 1952, he proceeded on leave on average pay till October 11, 1952.
The appellant asked the Punjab High Court for a certificate for leave to appeal to this Court.
The Union of India filed an appeal, being First Appeal No.
The appellant then moved this Court and obtained special leave, and Civil Appeal No.
