As numbered above, an appeal before the learned Sessions Judge, Jhansi did number bring any relief to the appellant and so also was the revision before the High Court.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows On getting information on 22.01.1990 that one Truck No.
Superintendent M.U. Farooki went to the spot and found a Truck No.
It was found that 22 carat Cast Iron Grade I were without Tie Bars.
It was accepted that numberCast Iron Grade I companyld have been loaded.
At that point of time, the Contractor, the present appellant was also present near the Truck along with some persons.
Challenge in the revision was to the order passed by a learned Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No.2060 of 1990 by which the order of companyviction and sentence, as recorded by the learned Additional CJM, was companyfirmed.
The Contractor called his labourers and unloaded the Cast Iron Grade I from the truck.
They were asked to climb up the truck and take a look, and after examining, they reported that some Cast Iron Grade I was loaded in the truck.
UP 93, 1665 of Minakshi Traders was being loaded at scrap yard of Jhansi with Cast Iron Grade I illegally with the Cast Iron Grade II, the inspector R.K. Rajput, along with Dy.
Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court dismissing the revision petition filed by the appellant under Section 397, read with Section 401 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1973 in short the Code .
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J Leave granted.
Inside the truck approximately, 7 Tons of Cast Iron Grade II were loaded.
Arising out of S.L.P. Crl.
No.6188 of 2007 DR.
Superintendent Incharge called the Head Constable 878 Taradat Sati and DSK Lala Ram.
UP 93 1665 near the Auction Hall which was loaded with Cast Iron Grade II.
