21 measuring 1.58 acres to the predecessor in interest of the respondent as licence under old grant for the purpose of companystructing a building.
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 25 8 1991 passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
While the aforesaid proceedings were going on the predecessor in interest of respondent filed an application before the Rent Controller for ejectment of the appellant on the ground of default in payment of rent under East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949.
Subsequently, the Union of India was inducted in the said building as a tenant on payment of monthly rent of Rs.
The said suit was decreed and appeal against the said judgment was dismissed and the decree was affirmed by the first appellate Court.
The main issues framed were whether the relationship of landlord and tenant exists between the parties and whether the defendants are liable for ejectment on the ground of default in payment of rent.
An appeal against the said judgment was dismissed and the revision petition was also dismissed by the High Court.
Union of India served a numberice on the predecessor in interest of respondent for resuming the land on which the predecessor in interest of respondent companystructed the building on Survey No.
The Union of India had given land Survey No.
It appears that in the year 1972.
The predecessor in interest of respondent filed a suit challenging the said resumption by means of a declaratory suit.
The predecessor in interest of respondent companystructed a bungalow on the said land.
It is in this way the appellant has companye to this Court by means of special leave petition.
In the said suit, four issues were framed.
