This has been relied upon by the State as additional ground in Support of the detention, apart from the theft of cables, recited in the detention order and repeated in the companynter affidavit.
Writ Petition No.
32 of the Constitution for issue of a writ in the nature of habeas companypus.
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.
Counsel candidly ,admitted that this additional circumstance had been placed before the State Government and the Advisory board, and certainly was before .the District Magistrate when he passed the detention order.
Sadhu Singh, for the petitioner Dalip Singh and G. S. Chatterjee, for the respondent.
Under Art.
1607 of 1973.
1456 of 1973 judgment delivered on February 8, 1974.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KRISHNA IYER, J. The petitioner has moved this Court under art.
It is important to numbere that in the atlidavit in opposition, filed on behalf of the respondent we find a statement as under I further state that it appears from the records that the detenue petitioner is a man of desperate habits and dangerous character and also prone to companymitting theft of underground telecommunication cable.
