288/77.
330/77 was companypromised as between the parties.
From the Judgment and Order dated 26.5.89 of the Delhi High Court in SAO No.
Dr. Y.S. Chitale, Mrs. and Mr. Rajan Karanjawala, Atul Chitale and H.S. Anand for the Appellant.
330/77.
K Jain, J.P. Gupta, Mrs. Darshan Gupta and P.D. Sharma for the Respondent.
84 of 1989.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The former suit was registered as Suit No.
On April 17, 1978 the Suit No.
On December 24, 1977 Suit No.
288/77 was decreed in favour of the appellant.
Section 14 7 prohibits the landlord from obtaining possession of the premises before the expiration of a period of six months from the date of the eviction order.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J. This appeal is against the order for reinduction of the tenant into the premises under section 19 2 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 The Act .
3804 of 1989.
288/77 and the later as Suit No.
The facts are these The appellant filed two eviction peti tions against the respondents one was under section 14 1 e on the ground of personal bona fide requirement for occupation and the other was under section 14 1 e for number payment of rent.
