The appellant feeling aggrieved by the revisional orders preferred two appeals in the High Court of Karnataka.
The Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bellary passed an order of assessment under Section 12 3 of the Act vide order dated 12.07.1990 for the assessment years 1987 88 and 1988 89.
The Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Devangere Zone, Devangere issued numberices dated 16.02.1994 and 21.03.1994 under Section 22A of the Act proposing to revise the order of assessment dated 12.07.1990 passed by the Assessing Authority on the ground that the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue.
The appellant is a dealer registered under the provisions of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 hereinafter referred to as the Act engaged in the activity of hulling paddy and is also a trader in rice, paddy husk and rice bran.
Dr. AR.LAKSHMANAN, J. These appeals were filed against the order dated 15.11.1999 in T.A.Nos.31 and 32 of 1996 on the file of the High Court of Karnataka vide which, the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant herein.
