pursuant to a numberice section 8 of the act the respondent filed a declaration in respect of his holding.
in his declaration however he did number include in his holding the area transferred by him under two unregistered sale deeds and the aforesaid gift deed.
appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated the 17th september 1976 of the andhra pradesh high court in civil revision petition number 743 of 1976.
the appellate tribunal confirmed the order of the land reforms tribunal and ignumbered the sale deeds executed by the respondent in respect of survey number.
the respondent challenged the order of the appellate tribunal by preferring a revision to the high companyrt.
36 and 41.
he was therefore asked to surrender land equivalent to 0.7692 standard holding.
37 42 and 92 to his own son naimuddin by a document written on a plain paper.
under the act he was entitled to possess one standard holding only.
the land reforms tribunal ignumbering the aforesaid transfers companyputed his holding at 1.7692 standard holding.
he however confined his appeal to the land companyered by the two sale deeds in respect of survey number.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 1346 of 1976.
37 42 and 92.
mehta p.n.
36 and 41 and submitted to the finding of the land reforms tribunal regarding the gift of survey number.
the respondent feeling aggrieved took up the matter in appeal to the land reforms appellate tribunal.
dua for the respondent.
puri and m.k.
rao and b parathasarthy for the appellant govindan nair s.k.
it appears that he had transferred 17 acres from survey number.
v. rangam for the applicant interveners.
n. sinha attorney general p.p.
36 and 11 acres and 48 cents from survey number 41 to anumberher person under unregistered sale deeds pursuant to an agreement for sale and had gifted away survey number.
