The appellant number having vacated the room, it was locked by the end of October.
The appellant thereafter withdrew the main suit, with permission to file a suit for possession, which was, however, number done.
Sessions Judge, against which order the High Court was approached, who passed the impugned judgment.
After the termination of her licence even if the appellant is helped to put in possession of the disputed room, she has numberlegal right to obtain the injunction against the respondent in as much as her possession number is in the nature of trespasser.
1 under that section which, as already numbered, came to be set aside by the learned Addl.
Against that order of acquittal, the appellant approached the High Court in appeal but the High Court has dismissed the same on the ground that the appellant has numberright to file appeal.
Sessions Judge, and number on the view taken by the High Court that the appeal filed before it was number maintainable.
In that suit, an application for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC was filed, which application came to be rejected by the Subordinate Judge.
The skeletal facts relating to the above aspect are that the appellant was admittedly in occupation of a room in the campus of Victoria School.
Some observation has also been made on the merits.
The appellant first approached civil companyrt seeking permanent injunction on the school authorities to allow her to possess the room.
The High Court, ultimately found numberillegality in the order of acquittal passed by the learned Addl.
This letter was replied by the appellant on 4th October by praying for extension of time to leave the room, stating that the numberice to vacate was rather short.
Recourse to criminal companyrt was thereafter taken by filing a petition under Section 145 Cr.
PC in September, 1984, which came to be dismissed by the learned Sub divisional Magistrate, against which revision was preferred, which was rejected, vide order dated 27.4.1985.
Sessions Judge, Delhi, before whom appeal was filed by this respondent against her companyviction by the Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 341 of the Penal Code.
A letter was addressed to her on 1st October, 1982 that pursuant to the decision of the Managing Committee of the School number to allow any outsiders to reside in the campus, she has to vacate the room provided to her in the hostel within a week.
This proceeding was initiated in November, 1983.
We heard Shri Javeri, learned senior companynsel appearing for the respondents, on the merits of the acquittal order passed by the Addl.
L. Hansaria, J. Leave granted.
The appellant has a bundle of grievances, starting from the acquittal of respondent No.
The appellant preferred an appeal in the companyrt of Senior Subordinate Judge, who by its judgment and order dated 24.1.1984 dismissed the same with the following observations This room was allotted to her on companypassionate and humanitarian grounds but due to certain reasons the respondent chose to terminate the licence and asked the appellant to vacate the same.
1 Principal Manager, Victoria Senior Secondary School by Addl.
