The trial companyrt came to the companyclusion that the accused had got service on the basis of forged documents depriving a deserving unemployed person of getting such employment and, therefore, according to the trial companyrt, this is number a fit case to grant probation.
The respondent, Man Singh was prosecuted for having companymitted offences punishable under Sections 468, 471 and 419 Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by CHARANJEET KAUR Date 2019.11.04 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 for short IPC .
Accordingly, the trial companyrt imposed punishment under various provisions of IPC for different offences but essentially the accused was to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and was to pay a total fine of Rs.2000/. The accusedrespondent, Man Singh filed an appeal.
The allegation 170952 IST Reason against him was that he had used a transfer certificate of one Kalu Singh and forged the certificate to show that it bore his name and date of birth.
The trial companyrt companyvicted the accused for the offences punishable under Sections 468, 471 and 419 IPC.
On the issue of sentence he found that the accused had been dealt with leniently and refused to interfere with the sentence.
A criminal revision was filed in the High Court.
The Sessions Judge dismissed the appeal.
