It is the case of the respondent that a Receiver was appointed in Money Execution Case No.
1 For short the Act The brief facts leading to the present appeals are that the respondent filed an eviction petition against the appellants on the ground of number payment of arrears of rent in respect of two shops alleging that initially, Sudama Singh was tenant on the monthly rent of Rs.45/ and Rs.25/ per month but number the rent payable is Rs.306/ and Rs.174/ per month.
The appellant did number deposit any rent but filed an application to determine the arrears of rent asserting that they have paid monthly rent up to the month of June 1993 to the Receiver.
The respondent demanded arrears of rent but since the amount of arrears at the rate of Rs.306/ per month was number paid, the petition for eviction was filed.
The learned Single Bench set aside the order passed by the Trial Court as it chose to follow the order passed in CO 1941 of 2013, though another Coordinate Bench had taken a companytrary view in CO 55 of 2014.
23/1961 and the said Receiver was discharged vide order dated 10.02.2009.
HEMANT GUPTA, J. The challenge in the present appeals is to an order passed by the High Court of Calcutta on 13.05.2016 in two separate eviction petitions filed by the respondent herein against two tenants.
