Ignoring such companytention, a writ of mandamus was issued directing the appellant to appoint the respondent to the post of MVI.
The respondent filed a writ petition in 1996 after the lapse of selection list.
2598 2599 OF 2002 Heard learned companynsel for the appellant.
This fact was pointed out to the learned single Judge hearing the writ petition.
However, having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, we propose to dispose of these appeals with a short order.
Aggrieved thereby, a writ appeal was preferred by the State but without any result.
O R D E R CIVIL APPEAL NO.
The post of Motor Vehicle Inspector hereinafter MVI, for short was advertised.
The said list was valid for a period of one year.
Despite of receipt of numberice, neither any companynsel represents the respondent number he himself appears before this companyrt.
Hence, these appeals by special leave.
It lapsed on 17/11/1993.
The selection list was prepared on 17/11/1992.
