The High Court of Madhya Pradesh declined to accept the reference.
Appeal from the judgment and order dated April 30, 1963 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Criminal Revision No.
Against that order, with certificate granted by the High Court, the appellants have preferred this appeal.
215 of 1963.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
Ravinder Narain, O.C. Mathur and J. B. Dadachanji, for the appellants.
24 of 1963.
N. Shroff, for the respondent.
25/ as may be specified.
The Sessions Judge, Raipur in a petition moved by the appellants made a reference to the High Court of Madhya Pra desh recommending that the order passed by the Magistrate be set aside, for in his view the Trial Magistrate having failed to companyply with the mandatory terms of S. 130 1 b the proceeding against the appellants was unlawful.
b of sub s. 1 of s. 130 of the Act had deprived them of the right companyferred by the Act to intimate without appearing in Court their plea of guilty and remitting an amount number exceeding Rs.
124 and 112 of the Motor Vehicles Act 4 of 1939.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Shah, J. Station House Officer, Gharsiwa filed an informa tion in the Court of the Magistrate, First Class, Raipur against the two appellants companyplaining that they had on March 10, 1962 allowed three passengers to occupy the front seat in a public carrier and had loaded goods in excess of the sanctioned weight, and had, thereby companymitted offences punishable under ss.
