They, therefore, approached the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in A.No.6834 of 1994 seeking the following reliefs a to quash the final integrated list dated 18.10.1994, b a direction to the official respondents to prepare a fresh seniority list in accordance with the regularisation order issued on 9.1.1980 or in the alternative to direct them to determine their seniority from the date of their initial appointment.
The order of the Tribunal in O.A.No.6834/1994 was challenged by the number official respondents, in Civil Writ Petition Nos.1247 and 7848 of 2000.
The appellants were appointed as LDCs Junior Assistants on temporary basis between 5.12.1973 to 14.12.1974 in the Commercial Tax Department in the Srikakulam District of Visakhapatnam Division.
The order of the Tribunal in O.A.No.3955/1995 and O.A.No.5588/1995 was challenged in Civil Writ Petition Nos.
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Visakhapatnam to revise the said seniority list, based on the seniority list to be prepared in the category of Junior Assistants Typists Stenographers as per the directions issued by the Tribunal in A.No.6834/1994.
Firstly, all the candidates shown in the merit list were number parties before the Tribunal.
The said application was allowed by the Tribunal by its order dated 20.4.1999.
The service of appellants who were being companytinued as temporary LDCs, were regularised with effect from 3.6.1975 as per proceeding dated 9.1.1980 of the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Visakhapatnam.
Some of the appellants also filed O.A.No.3955/1995 and O.A.No.5588/1995 challenging the proceedings dated 20.06.1995 of the Dy.
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Visakhapatnam, by which he finalised the provisional seniority list of Senior Assistants in Commercial Tax Department Zone I. The Tribunal disposed of the said applications by order dated 15.12.1999 directing the Dy.
According to them they were so appointed in clear vacancies and that their names were sponsored by an Employment Exchange.
