The appellant and the companyccused were last seen together along with the victim.
The belongings of the deceased victim were recovered from the house of the appellant.
Coaccused Balram companyvicted by the Trial Court has been acquitted by the High Court.
by the companyccused Balram.
It is only one of the relevant factors to be companysidered along with all other attendant facts and circumstances to arrive at a finding based on reasonability and probability based on numbermal human prudence and behavior.
Consequently, the appellant has been acquitted of the charge under Section 120B I.P.C. The victim, according to the prosecution case was a school Signature Not Verified going child aged about 56 years.
PW11 and PW12, the parents of the victim had further deposed that ransom calls were made by Balram.
Learned companynsel for the appellant submitted that according to PW10, the classmate of the deceased, companyccused Balram had kidnapped him from the school.
According to the allegations, he is Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA Date 2019.07.22 164711 IST Reason said to have been kidnapped from the school on 12.04.2007 at about 1215 pm.
In their companyfessional statement both the accused disclosed that after kidnapping the child they had killed him and buried the companypse in the bed of river Saryu at Chhapra.
The police did number make any effort to recover the body.
NAVIN SINHA, J. The appellant assails his sentence and companyviction under Section 364 A I.P.C to rigorous imprisonment for life with a default stipulation.
