A Contempt Petition came to be filed by the petitioner in W.P.S.T. No.47 of 2009.
They also undertook to follow the directions that they had allegedly flouted as soon as the Tribunal resumes sittings after the summer vacations.
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Calcutta in C.P.A.N. No.
By the impugned judgment and order, the learned Judges of the High Court, though having accepted the unconditional apology offered by the companytemnors, have passed some remarks against the members of the State Administrative Tribunal.
On entertaining the Contempt Petition, the Court had issued numberices to the members of the State Administrative Tribunal.
Leave granted.
Aggrieved by these observations, the appellants are before us in this civil appeal.
The allegation in the companyplaint was that though the High Court had directed the Tribunal to advance the hearing of the application filed before it, the same had number been companyplied with by the Tribunal and had number passed appropriate orders on merits of the application filed by the petitioner.
They had offered their explanation, explaining the so called lapses on their part and further, had offered unconditional apology by stating that, if for any reason, the companyrt companyes to the companyclusion that there is some disobedience of the directions issued by the Court, the same may be companydoned in the light of the unconditional apology offered.
50 of 2010 arising out of P.S.T. No.47 of 2009 dated 19.05.2010.
