Questioning the same, SLPs were filed by the State as well as certain affected parties who were granted leave to appeal.
542/2000 and CA Nos.4440 4441 4442 SLP Nos.
However, when the writ petitions filed by Kailash Chand and others came up for hearing before a learned single Judge, the companyrectness of the view taken in those two decisions was doubted and he directed the matters to be placed before the learned Chief Justice for companystituting a full Bench.
By the time this order was passed on 19.7.1999, we are informed that the select lists of candidates were published in many districts.
10778 81/2001, 10929, 14560 63/2001, 15579, 4979, 5017 18, 5021, 20286, 20297, 20296, 20293 94, 20298, 11496, 11642, 11619, 11618, 11614, 20300, 11789, 11620, 12011 13, 11879, 20289, 12289, 20290, 11359, 20292 of 2001 and SLP Nos.2297, 2503 of 2000 and W.P. No.
The Division Bench by its order dated 13.4.2001 dismissed those appeals.
Against this judgment SLPs were filed by the original writ petitioners six in number as well as the State Government and the Zila Parishad.
By the time the selection process was initiated and companypleted, these decisions were holding the field.
With CA Nos.4418 21, 4423, 4427 4429, 4431, 4432, 4437, 4438 39, 4434, 4443, 4444, 4445, 4446 47, 4449, 4450, 4451, 4452, 4453, 4454, 4455, 4456, 4457, 4458 60, 4461, 4462, 4463, 4464, 4465, 4466, 4435, 4436/02 SLP Nos.
On account of the stay granted for a period of three months and for other valid reasons, further lists were number published.
Arising out of S.L.P. No.
After the full Bench judgment one more batch of writ petitions came to be disposed of by a learned single Judge of the High Court on 26.2.2001 directing a fresh merit list to be prepared in respect of the candidates who were number appointed on or before 21.10.1999 without regard to the bonus marks.
Appeals against this judgment were filed by the State Government and other authorities.
1824 of 2000 .
Venkatarama Reddi, J. Leave to appeal granted.
