Against the award, two suits were filed.
Thereafter, the respondents participated in the proceedings before the sole arbitrator throughout without any demur and the award was passed by the sole arbitrator on 3.
On 18/04/1996, a companytract was awarded to the appellant by the respondents for work of lining the bed and sides of M.S. Right Main Canal.
The learned Judge, by its order dated 30/04/1993, rejected the names supplied by the parties and appointed Mr. Justice Punniah, retired Judge of the High Court as sole arbitrator.
These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 1/11/2004 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in CRP No.4880/2003 and AAO No.3514/2003.
The work companyld number be companypleted within stipulated time for the reasons which we are number companycerned here.
The said order has attained finality.
1087 1088 OF 2008 Arising out of SLP C Nos.5721 5722/2005 Leave granted.
In the O.S. filed by the respondents herein, they raised an objection that the arbitrator has passed the award without any jurisdiction.
167/1990 before the Principal Subordinate Judge, Nasaraopet under Section 8 1 b of Arbitration Act, 1940 for appointing arbitrator from list of names supplied by the appellant.
On 06/06/1991, the appellant filed O.P. No.
2 approached the Civil Court and filed an application praying to take up arbitration and act as arbitrator.
The learned Judge allowed O.S. No.108/1996 filed by the appellant herein and O.S. 110/1996 filed by the respondents herein was dismissed with companyts.
O.S. No.108/1996 was filed by the appellant herein for making award the Rule of Court.
3 02/03/1995.
A dispute arose.
The appellant, by its letter dated 20/10/1990, addressed to the respondent to settle the dues.
O R D E R CIVIL APPEAL NOS.
In that application, companynter was filed by the respondent herein objecting to jurisdiction of arbitrator.
O.S. No.110/1996 was filed by the respondents herein to set aside the award dated 02/03/1995.
Undisputedly, the order dated 30/04/1993 passed by the learned Judge rejecting the names of arbitrator supplied by the parties and appointing Mr. Justice Punniah, retired Judge of the High Court as sole arbitrator has number been assailed by the respondents herein.
Ultimately, the work was finally companypleted in 1989.
On 13/12/1990, the appellant 2.
The learned Judge also allowed the decree and made the award dated 02/03/1995 Rule of the Court.
On 13/02/1991, the Court refused to act as arbitrator and dismissed the application.
Briefly stated, the facts are as follows.
However, it appears from the companynter that the respondent had submitted the names of Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation, Chief Engineer, Medium Irrigation and Commissioner, CADA.
The work was to be companypleted within a period of six months divided into two slabs of three months each, i.e. three months in the year 1986 and three months in 1987.
Hence, present appeals by special leave.
