was dismissed by the Principal Munsiff, Madhugiri, by recording a finding that the petitioner has failed to prove landlord tenant relationship between her and the number petitioner appellant herein .
However, the High Court allowed the second revision preferred by the respondent and ordered eviction of the appellants herein.
The petition filed by Smt.
Heard learned companynsel for the parties.
The revision filed by the respondent under Section 50 of the Act was dismissed by First Additional District Judge, Tumkur and the finding recorded by the Principal Munsiff on the issue of landlord tenant relationship between the parties was companyfirmed.
N. Kamalamma predecessor in interest of the respondent under Section 21 a b f and j of the Karnataka Rent Control Act for short, the Act for eviction of N.S. Subbanarasimha Sastry who is number represented by L.Rs.
