For the purpose of disposal of this appeal, we would only take numbere of certain basic facts.
Some land was also registered by the appellant in favour of the deceased as demanded by the respondents herein.
The prosecution against A 4 and A 5 for the offence under Section 306 and Sections 3 and 4 and of the Act is quashed.
Respondent No.5 Chinta Suribabu is a Sub Inspector of Police of Annavaram Police Station, situate in East Godavari District.
The appellant is the first informant who lodged the first information report before the Sub Inspector of Police, P.S. Bhimavaram on 26.3.2006 as against the respondents herein.
4 5 who were arrayed as accused Nos.4 5 in the said first information report, are companycerned.
Relying on or on the basis of the suicide numbere, a first information report, as numbericed hereinbefore, was lodged on 26.3.2006.
The first information report was lodged under Section 306 of the I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
30,000/ was returned and the rest of the dowry amount was promised to be returned by the end of March, 2006.
The marriage was to take place on 3.2.2006.
Respondent No.4 Nekkanti Ravindra Kumar is a teacher in a village Chinamallam in the West Godavari District.
There are six respondents in this appeal but numberice was issued to respondent Nos.
The deceased companymitted suicide by jumping from a running train on 26/3/2006.
All the accused filed an application before the High Court for quashing of the said first information report on or about 8.6.2006.
After the betrothal ceremony was over, the accused No.1 obtained an employment in a factory.
4 5 only.
Allegedly, the demand for dowry was increased.
Accused No.1 at the relevant time was number employed.
However, the prosecution against A 1 to A 3 shall companytinue.
They are as under The deceased was a student of M.B.A She had done her post graduation.
The impugned order is number a speaking one.
It also appears that the deceased and accused No.1 were in companystant touch with each other.
Leave granted.
The families of the deceased and accused No.1 negotiated for marriage and engagement ceremony was held on 18.8.2006.
By reason of the impugned judgment the said application has been allowed so far as respondent Nos.
The said first information report is based on three suicidal numberes written by Sujatha the deceased one to the police department and public, second to the her near relatives and third to accused No.1 who was her would be husband.
