P.C. claiming maintenance from the appellant.
In the application it was claimed that she was unemployed and unable to maintain herself.
The applicant can maintain herself from the money received from the sale of agricultural land and rent.
The matter was further carried before the High Court by filing an application in terms of Section 482 Cr.
The sale proceeds were still with the applicant.
The appellant was getting pension of about Rs.5,700/ p.m. and was number getting any house rent regularly.
The plea that the appellant had married another lady was denied.
No.4379 of 2006 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
The applicant sold the agricultural land on 13.3.2003.
She let out the house on rent and since 1979 was residing with one of their sons.
Revision petition was filed by the present appellant.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
The stand of the appellant was that the applicant was living in the house companystructed by the present appellant who had purchased 7 bighas of land in Ratlam in the name of the applicant.
He was getting 2 3 thousand rupees per month.
P.C. reads as follows 125.
It was further submitted that the applicant at the relevant point of time was staying in the house of the appellant and electricity and water dues were being paid by him.
Appellant had retired from the post of Assistant Director of Agriculture and was getting about Rs.8,000/ as pension and a similar amount as house rent.
Challenge was to the direction to pay Rs.1500/ p.m. by the trial Court.
Besides this, he was lending money to people on interest.
1627 OF 2007 Arising out of SLP Crl.
Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench, dismissing the revision petition filed by the appellant in terms of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in short Cr.
Considering the evidence on record, the trial Court found that the applicant respondent did number have sufficient means to maintain herself.
P.C. The challenge before the High Court was to the order passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Neemuch, M.P. as affirmed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Neemuch, M.P. The respondent had filed an application under Section 125 of Cr.
Undisputedly, the appellant and the respondent had entered into marital knot about four decades back and for more than two decades they were living separately.
The appellant claimed Rs.10,000/ as maintenance.
