Under Article 32 of the Constitution K. Garg, S. Balakrishnan and M.K.D. Namboodiri for the Petitioner, in W.P. No.
187/79.
The Judgment of V.R. Krishna Iyer, S. Murtaza Fazal Ali and D.A. Desai, JJ.
K. Gupta, Vivek Seth, Miss Madhu Moolchandani and P. Rana for the Respondent No.
1, in W.P. 187/79.
151, 187, 238, 458, 1038, 1069 and 1277 of 1979.
General, R.N. Sachthey and Miss Subhashini for the Respondent in W.P. Nos.
Soli J. Sorabjee, Sol.
151/79.
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition Nos.
Soli J. Sorabjee Sol.
K. Ganguli and D.P. Mukherjee for the Petitioner in P. 238/79.
Soli J. Sorabjee, Sol.
458 238/79.
General, E.C. Agarwala, R.N. Sachthey and Miss A. Subhashini for the Respondent, in W.P. No.
1038/79.
R. Mridul and H.K. Puri for the Petitioner, in W.P. No.
And, despite the heavier burden thrown on the judges during the hours outside companyrt sittings by agreeing to read through and discuss the review papers for themselves, there is obvious acceleration of disposal of review petitions without intrusion into companyrt time.
was delivered by Krishna Iyer, J., R.S. Pathak, J. gave a separate Opinion on behalf of A.D. Koshal, J. and himself.
Dr. L.M. Singhvi and Sardar Bahadur Saharya for the intervener.
L. Sanghi and Miss Lily Thomas for the Petitioners in P. Nos.
Petitioner in person in W.P. No.
187/79.
458/79.
1069 1277/79.
K. Ganguli and O.P. Rana for the petitioner in W.P. No.
E.C. Agarwala, R.N. Sachthey and Miss A. Subhashini for the Respondent No.
151/1979.
