The suit itself was filed after the companysolidation proceedings had companye to a close.
During the pendency of the companysolidation proceedings in a district, there is a provision in the statute that there should number be transfers, gifts and sales so that companyplications and companyfusions at all in the Act which inhibits companytracts for sale being entered into by owners of property.
This agreement dated 16 6 1960 was sought to be enforced by a suit for specified performance although by that time Jeewa Ram had passed away and his daughter, the present appellant No.
One Jeewa Ram, who had a half share in a tract of land Ac.
3,000/ to respondent No.
O 06, was included in the chak allotted to Jeewa Ram and the 1st respondent.
On account of this companysequence, he urged that specific performance companyld number be granted us a discretionary relief.
In the present case, the facts are brief and the law is clear.
1 became his legal representative.
6 00 in extent with a small house thereon, had entered into an agreement to sell his share for a companysideration of Rs.
In Uttar Pradesh agricultural lands are subjects to companysolidation proceedings under the relevant statute.
R. Krishna Iyer, J. This is a short appeal raising a single point and challenges a decree for specific performance passed by the trial companyrt, reversed in appeal but restored by a Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court.
