31 of 2001 by its judgment dated 12th June, 2003.
1 lakh for an offence under Section 23 of the NDPS Act.
He was, therefore, companyvicted for an offence under Section 23 of the NDPS Act and sentenced to undergo RI for 10 years and also to pay a fine of Rs.
By the judgment under appeal, the companyviction of all the appellants was set aside.
By the judgment under appeal, three appeals came to be preferred by the three different accused who were companyvicted for different offences under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for short the NDPS Act by the Court of 5th Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mothari of East Champaran District in Excise Case No.
The trial companyrt found the respondent herein guilty of an offence under Section 23 of the NDPS Act but found that the charge under Section 29 of the Act is number proved against him.
The sole respondent along with two other accused was tried for offences under Sections 23 and 29 of the NDPS Act.
It is number very clear whether any appeals are preferred against the acquittal of the other two accused except the respondent herein.
359 of 2003 of the High Court of Patna, the instant appeal is preferred by the Union of India.
Chelameswar, J. Aggrieved by the judgment in Criminal Appeal No.
