The companyplainant Bhaskar PW1 also numbericed burn marks on her head, leg and back.
1 Rajendra is demanding ornaments for the purpose of companystruction of a new house.
The appeal of the accused Nos.
She told her father to give the money to her husband otherwise she would be required to dispose of her ornaments.
Jalgaon Jamod which is 3 kms away from village Kherda Khurd of the companyplainant Bhaskar Sampat Damodhar PW1 , who is the father of the deceased.
As Bhaskar PW1 suspected that the death of his daughter was number natural, he went to the Police Station Jalgaon Jamod for lodging a report.
He was informed that his daughter had gone to a well for drawing water and there she accidentally slipped into the well.
The appellants who are the parents of accused No.
During that period Kalpana informed her parents that she has been harassed to get the balance amount by her husband and his relatives.
On getting this information, the companyplainant went to the village of the accused persons along with his relatives and found the dead body of his daughter which was lying companyered with a cloth with injuries on her person.
Within 15 days of her marriage the deceased returned to her parents place along with her husband and informed her parents that her husband accused No.
199 of 2002.
On this, Bhaskar Damodhar PW1 informed accused No.
4 Balu came to the companyplainants house and informed that his daughter has fallen into a well.
2 3 in this case.
1 Rajendra that he has Rs.
5,000/ after selling his cattle and persuaded him to take Kalpana along with him and thereafter the deceased left with her husband.
5,000/ and assured accused No.
1 Rajendra Dhundale on 18.3.2001 in a village known as Uti Tq.
On the next day accused No.
Thereafter, on the eve of Akhadi festival a brother of deceased Kalpana fetched her to her parents house.
They were also found guilty under Sections 498A/34 IPC and were sentenced to three years R.I. and also a fine.
481 2007 Arising out of Special Leave Petition Crl.
5000/ after 15 days.
On this, Bhaskar assured accused No.
Heard learned companynsel for the parties and perused the record.
The trial companyrt companyvicted them along with accused No.
5000/ but Rajendra refused to take the amount and demanded Rs.
1 Rajendra that he would give the balance amount of Rs.
10,000/ for the time being.
1 Rajendra also came to attend a marriage in their village and he resided with them for three days.
1 Rajendra, are accused Nos.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
6392/2006 MARKANDEY KATJU, J. Leave granted.
The case of the prosecution is that the deceased Kalpana was married to accused No.
Bhaskar Damodhar PW1 paid the sum of Rs.
This appeal has been directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 20.3.2006 of the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench in Criminal Appeal No.
2 3 in the High Court was dismissed and hence this appeal by way of special leave.
