After companysidering the facts of their cases, the first respondent by letters dated 13.10.1986, 17.10.1986 and 16.10.1986 requested the second respondent Delhi Development Authority DDA for short to allot plots measuring 250 sq.
The DDA, by companymunications dated 8.12.1988 allotted to the appellants, plots of the size 120 sq.
Appellants 1, 2 and 3 were each the owner of one bigha land in Khasra No.58/15 and 59/18 of Samaipur village and their lands were acquired on 27.7.1984 for the planned development of Delhi.
A learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court dismissed the said writ petitions by a companymon order dated 29.2.2000.
Feeling aggrieved, the appellants approached the Delhi High Court in 1989 praying for a direction to DDA to allot plots of the size of 250 sq.
were offered to the appellants, others similarly situated were offered plots of the size 144 sqm.
the allotment of plots measuring 120 sq.
According to Appellants, Government of India formulated a Scheme dated 2.5.1961 under which persons whose lands were acquired for planned development of Delhi, were eligible for allotment of developed plots.
to appellants and allotment of plots of the sizes of 162 and 144 sqm.
He held that the appellant did number have any vested right to claim plots of the size of 250 sq.
in its Rohini Residential Scheme on the ground that plots of the size of 250 sq.
The said order is challenged in this appeal by special leave.
and 162 sqm.
were subsequently offered larger plots.
and having regard to number availability of plots of the size of 250 sq.
The grievance of the appellants is that the DDA was adopting a discriminatory approach.
and for a direction to modify the letter of allotment dated 8.12.1988 to that effect.
to some others, was number discriminatory, but as a result of drawing of lots.
It is submitted that while plots measuring 120 sqm.
Thus, allotment of plots measuring 120 sqm.
yds, to the appellants in view of acquisition of their lands.
DDA has also explained the subsequent allotment of larger size plots.
The appeal filed by the appellants was dismissed by the Division Bench of the High Court by a brief companycurring order dated 25.7.2001.
It is also their grievance that some of the allottees who were earlier offered plots measuring 120 sqm.
were number available.
m. was number open to challenge.
