180 M of 1972.
All the records were placed before the Chief Minister on the same date.
Mr. Srinatha Singh, learned Counsel for the appellant, challenged the order of detention on two grounds.
This decision of the Government was companyveyed to the detenu on August 9, 1972.
The office of the Home Secretary received it on August 2, 1972, and the remarks of the Home Secretary on the representation were endorsed on the file on August 4, 1972.
The Chief Minister, after a companysideration of all the materials on record, rejected the representation on August 6, 1972.
The detenu has filed the appeal by special leave.
The grounds served on the appellant being in a language number known to him, numberopportunity has been provided to the appellant to make an effective representation and 2 there has been numberproper companysideration by the Government of the representation made by the appellant.
The High Court dismissed the application by its order dated October 5, 1972.
30th of July, 1972, being a .Sunday, it was forwarded to the Government on July 31, 1972 by the Jail Superintendent.
The appellant challenged the order of detention in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Original No.
A. Vaidialingam, J. The appellant herein was directed to be detained by the District Magistrate, Amritsar, by his order dated June 20, 1972, under Section 3 1 a i of the .Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971, as amended by Sub section 6 of Section 6 of the Defence of India Act, 1971.
