After having gone into various questions, the High Court dismissed the writ petition.
The second semester of Part I was companyducted in April May, 1995.
The first semester examination of Part I was companyducted in 1994.
It is against the said judgment that this appeal has been preferred.
The appellant has filed this appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi in Writ Petition No.
The appellant was a student in the Master of Finance Control Course of the Delhi University for the period 1994 96.
Various questions were debated in the High Court.
Thereafter, the appellant applied for revaluation in the four examinations in which he was shown to have failed.
By the middle of July, 1995, the appellant started attending the Course of Part II.
Inasmuch as the appellant did number receive any reply thereto, he filed the writ petition.
It shows that the appellant had number companypleted four examinations in Part I. Therefore, the appellant was asked to discontinue Part II Course.
3456/1995.
Firstly, whether while demoting the appellant from Part II to Part I Course, the principles of natural justice were violated, whether there was a specific rule providing for observance of principles of natural justice and whether there was a provision for revaluation, and even if there was a provision of revaluation, whether the same was extended to Professional Courses and whether the Course in which the appellant was studying, companyld be described as a Professional Course?
This was in August, 1995.
