Believing the prosecution evidence, the High Court came to the companyclusion that the companymission of offence by A1 to A3 was proved.
On appeal the High Court maintained the acquittal of A4 to A7 but reversed the findings in respect.
From the Judgment and Order dated 26.4.1979 of the Tamil Nadu High Court in Criminal Appeal No.
This appeal by A1 to A3 via special leave petition is against the judgment of the High Court.
All the ac cused persons were acquitted by the learned Trial Judge.
While granting special leave to appeal this Court by its order dated August 10, 1979 allowed bail to the appel lants.
393 of 1979.
of A1to A3.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
Revision Case No.
197 of 1978 and Crl.
V. Venkataraman for the Respondent.
R. Lalit and K.R. Choudhary for the Appellants.
The second charge related to rioting wherein A1, A2, A4, A5 and A3, A6 were tried under Sections 147 and 148 I.P.C. respectively.
833 of 1977.
Three charges were framed against them.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KULDIP SINGH, J. Parusuraman Velladurai, Karuppaiah, Nagasundaram and four others hereinafter referred to as A1 to A7 were tried for the murder of one Jawahar.
They were companyvicted under Section 304 Part I read with Section 34, I.P.C. and were sentenced to undergo rigor ous imprisonment for five years.
