Actually, the lady and her husband left the hospital and went to their place in the State of Andhra Pradesh where the husband is said to have died later of TB.
This appeal is preferred against the judgment of a learned Single Member of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal allowing the original application filed by the respondent.
i that a companyy of the preliminary enquiry report was number furnished to the respondent and ii that the companyplainant or her husband were number examined at the enquiry and, therefore, the respondent had numberopportunity to cross examine them.
The enquiry was actually companyducted by a team of two doctors, Dr Rangarajan and Dr Mancy Alexander.
The Enquiry Officer examined a companyworker and certain other persons who were present in the ward at the relevant time.
In spite of efforts being made, the presence of the lady with whom the respondent is said to have misbehaved companyld number be secured.
Even so on the basis of the evidence available, the Enquiry Officer reported that the respondent is guilty.
Heard learned companynsel for the parties.
The proceedings were initiated on the basis of a companyplaint filed by the said lady.
The respondent was a Male Nursing Assistant in the TB Hospital.
Leave granted.
On the basis of the preliminary enquiry report, a regular enquiry was ordered.
Even earlier he had tried to tease her.
The charge against him is that he tried to misbehave with the wife of an in patient during the night.
