226 which was dismissed on November 3, 1952 on the ground that it was premature.
A full bench of the High Court quashed the order of the Collector and the State of U.P. has companye in appeal to this Court.
As the Collector himself was in doubt, he referred the matter to the Board of Revenue which, after a fairly long time, held that the document was liable to duty in accordance with Art.
Notice to this effect was served on the respondent on November, 10, 1951.
Appeal from the judgment and decree dated the January 27, 1956, of the Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench at Lucknow in Civil Misc.
226 of the Constitution in the Allahabad High Court challenging the legality of the, imposition of the stamp duty and the penalty and prayed for a writ of certiorari.
369 of 1957.
Thereupon the respondent filed a petition in the High Court under Art.
J. B. Agarwala and C. P. Lal, for the appellant.
On September 12, 1948, the, respondent executed a wakf by oral recitation of Sigha and then it was written on a stamped paper which was signed by the respondent and attested by, Witness.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
February 16.
D. Misra, for the respondent.
17 of 1954 0.
58 of the Stamp Act.
Application No.
85,595/7/ and a penalty of Rs 5/ was against law and companyld number be realized against him and prayed that the order be quashed.,,
226 of the Constitution praying that the imposition of stamp duty by the Collector of Sitapur, of Rs.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KAPUR.,
Thereafter on March 1 1944, the respondent filed a petition under Art.
The respondent filed a petition under Art.
J. This is an appeal against the judgment and order of the High Court of Allahabad on a certificate granted by that companyrt.
On September 15, 1948, it was presented to the Collector for his opinion under s. 31 as to the duty chargeable.
