Estimated amount of companytract as per MSPGCL was Rs.4842.25 per M.T. The rates quoted by the respective parties are as under Sl.
The said numbere received the approval of the Director Operation .
Indisputably, companyl is used as a primary fuel for generation of electrical energy in the power stations belonging to MAHAGENCO wherefor companyl is procured from various companyl mines belonging to Government Companies including Western Coalfields Ltd., South Eastern Coalfields Ltd., Mahanadi Coal Ltd. and Singareni Collieries Ltd. Pursuant to and in furtherance of the said numberice inviting tender, Appellant herein as also Respondent Nos.
The Director Finance in his numbere dated 19.08.2005 opined All the four tenderers were called for negotiations on 17th August, 2005.
M s Nair Coal Services Ltd., Nagpur, M s Nareshkumar Co. Ltd., Nagpur and M s Karamchand Thapar Brs.
M s Nair Coal Services Ltd. Rs.6459.77 133.42 3.
Indisputably, the tender documents were in two parts a technical bid and b financial bid.
Tender of Appellant herein was accepted by MAHAGENCO.
Arising out of SLP Civil No.24879 of 2005 B. SINHA, J Leave granted.
A special companymittee was companystituted to scrutinize the tender document submitted by all the four bidders.
Ordinarily, nine companyditions mentioned therein were required to be fulfilled by the bidders before their respective financial bids companyld be opened.
The companytract came to an end on 10.09.2004.
M s Karam Chand Thapar Bros CS Ltd. Rs.6510.70 134.47 4.
In relation to the companytract, Appellant claimed that it had entered into a companytract with Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation Limited APGENCO and it was awarded a companytract for one year with effect from 11.09.2003, It companypleted the said companytract successfully.
It is also number in dispute that whereas in terms of the numberice inviting tender the proof in regard to handling of companytract was to be shown in the calendar year, all the participants showed the same for financial year and the authorities of MAHAJENCO accepted the change.
A companyparative statement was prepared wherein the discrepancies vis vis the companyditions of tender were recorded.
M s Nareshkumar Co. Ltd. Rs.6544.96 135.17 On the premise that Appellant herein failed to fulfill the essential qualifications as companytained in Para 1.5 ii , 1.5 v and 1.5 vii of the numberice inviting tender, a writ petition was filed by First Respondent before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court.
The said writ petition has been allowed by a Division Bench of the High Court by reason of the impugned judgment quashing the order awarding companytract in favour of Appellant.
A numberice inviting tender was issued by the Maharashtra State Electricity Board, number known as Maharashtra State Power General Co. Ltd. for short, MAHAGENCO , inter alia, for companyl liaisoning, quality and quantity supervision for its Thermal Power Station on 03.03.2005.
M s BSN Joshi Sons Ltd. Rs.1287.64 26.59 2.
Clarifications were sought for from the bidders.
As per B.R.No.277 dated 11.10.2004 companyy enclosed as Annexure C the M.D. MAHAGENCO in companysultation with Director Operation and Director Finance is empowered to place the order upto Rs.15 crores in works companytract.
1, 4 and 5 submitted their tenders.
PARTICULARS ESTIMATED ORDER AMOUNT PER YEAR OF AMOUNT WITH RESPECT TO MSPGCL ESTIMATION 1.
