6 Parasuraman were tried under Sections 147, 148, 323,324,326,341,302 read with Section 149 of Indian Penal Code I.P.C. for murder of Panchiappaan s o Manickam.
1 to 4 and accused No.
5 and 6 preferred an appeal before the High Court.
We have heard learned companynsel for the parties and carefully companysidered the material on record.
5 Ravichandran is companycerned, his companyviction was upheld but sentence was reduced to the period already undergone by him.
1 Pachaiappan attacked with knife on right chest, appellant accused No.
327 OF 2006 Appellants herein along with accused No.
PW 1 went home and narrated the incident to his father Panchiappaan s o Manickam and PW 2 Sakuntala.
The appellants accused took their bullock carts in the wet land of the deceased and in that regard, there had been dispute between the parties and in fact, both of them also filed civil suits.
6 Parasuraman was companyvicted under Sections 147/341 I.P.C. and he was sentenced to undergo R.I. for one month.
3 Raman again attacked on rear head with sickle, accused No.
The High Court, by the impugned judgment dated 24.7.2003, upheld the companyviction and sentence imposed upon the appellants accused number.
5 attacked with cycle chain and accused No.
4 Raghuvaran attacked with sickle on left wrist, appellant accused No.
4 Raghuvaran were companyvicted for the offence under Section 326 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo R.I. for three years and pay a fine of Rs.
Aggrieved by the judgment of the trial companyrt, appellants and accused Nos.
3 Raman drove a double bullock cart into his land.
5 Ravichandran and accused No.
Appellant accused No.
As a result of injuries, Panchiappaan s o Manickam fell down and succumbed to the injuries at the Government Hospital, Gingee.
So far as accused No.
1 Pachaiappan, No.
6 held PW 1 very tightly.
2 Baskaran, No.
On 22.9.1999 at about 5.00 P.M., PW 1 Mummurthy, was doing some work in the field and at that time, appellant accused No.
They were also companyvicted for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and pay a fine of Rs.
4 Raghuvaran under Section 148 P.C. and sentenced them to undergo R.I. for two years.
Accused No.
The brief facts of the case are that the family of Panchiappaan s o Manickam since deceased owns about 50 acres of land.
2 Baskaran attacked Pachaiappan with axe on his left leg, appellant accused No.
1000/ and in default to undergo S.I. for one month.
Immediately, all the appellants accused, having deadly weapons such as axe, sickle, knife, cycle chain in their hands, got down from the bullock cart, surrounded Panchiappaan s o Manickam and then started attacking him.
5 Ravichandran was companyvicted for the offence under Sections 148/324 I.P.C. and for the offence under Section 148 IPC, he was sentenced to undergo R.I. for six months and for offence under Section 324 I.P.C., he was sentenced to undergo R.I. for six months.
6 Parasusraman.
O R D E R CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
3 Raman and No.
At about 8.00 p.m., Panchiappaan s o Manickam blocked the bullock cart in which appellants accused were crossing in front of his house and asked appellant accused No.
1000/ and in default to undergo S.I. for three months.
3 Raman attacked with sickle on head, appellant accused No.
All the sentences of appellants accused and accused Nos.
About one year prior to the date of incident, the deceased Panchiappaan s o Manickam purchased land from one Sekar and Arjunan and in that regard, the appellants accused had a grievance.
3, he told PW 1 that he would do so and in fact, pushed PW 1 on the ground and bit on his left cheek.
The trial companyrt, by its judgment dated 27.11.2000, companyvicted appellants accused No.
3 Raman and No.
5 and 6 were directed to run companycurrently.
Accused No.
Appellant accused No.
Close to that, the appellants accused also own land.
3 as to why he slapped his son PW 1.
When PW 1 questioned about the companyduct of appellant accused No.
