110 of 1981.
252 of 1974 by the order of the High Court dated 15th October, 1976.
In the meantime the suit property which is admittedly an intermediary estate stood vested with State of Orissa by virtue of a numberification dated 27th April, 1963 under Section 3 1 of the Orissa Estate Abolition Act hereinafter referred to as the Act .
The plaintiff decree holder deceased Rai Rout levied execution by filing an application which was registered as Execution Case No.
The decree holder, deceased Jai Rout challenged the said order of the Executing Court by filing a Revision in the High Court.
243 of 1953, the same suit was decreed on 30th March, 1965.
110 of 1981.
403 of 1987 arising out of a petition filed under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure in Execution Case No.
The executing companyrt by its order dated 10th March, 1987 allowed the application under Section 47, C.P.C. filed by the judgment debtor and dropped the execution case on a Indian that the property in question has been vested in the State Government and is numberlonger available to be executed under the decree.
The decree became final in as much as the appeal against decree was dismissed on the ground of abatement and the said order of abatement was also sustained in Civil Revision No.
During the pendency of said Revision, decree holder having died, the legal representatives were substituted who are the respondents in this appeal.
The judgment debtor is the appellant in this Court.
The Judgment debtor filed an objection under Section 47 challenging the executability of the decree in question.
PATTANAIK.
J. Leave granted.
This appeal is directed against the Judgment of the Orissa High Court dated 19th April, 1993 in Civil Revision No.
The deceased Jai Rout had filed a suit for recovery of possession in the Court of Munsif, Cuttack which was registered as Title Suit No.
