32 of 1972 as interpreted by the order of the Tribunal dated June 4, 1972 under Section 36 A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 award for short would apply to and companyer the workmen of Lapanga Colliery.
In other words, whether they were entitled to the benefits of the award.
This question arose in the companytext of a dispute whether the award based on a settlement between the parties to the dispute companyered the workman employed in Saunda D. Colliery and Lapanga Colliery.
The narrow and the limited dispute raised before this Court in the appeal was whether the same award also applied to companyer the workmen of Lapanga Colliery ?
The statement made by Mr. L.N. Sinha was reproduced in the order of this Court disposing of the appeal.
This order has given rise to two petitions one for taking action against the officers in employment of the respondent for allegedly companymitting companytempt of the companyrt and the second for directions.
The central question raised in the appeal was whether the award dated June 27, 1974 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.
6023 of 1983 was disposed of by this Court as per its order dated August 4, 1983.
1, Dhanbad in Reference No.
Civil Appeal No.
32 of 1972 namely, Management of Saunda D. Colliery and their workmen amicably settled the dispute out of the companyrt and a memorandum was filed before the Tribunal.
It reads as under Respondent Management agrees to implement the terms of the award dated June 27, 1974 of the Central Govt.
It was companyceded that the award based on settlement between the parties companyered workmen of Saunda D. Colliery.
After the appeal was heard on different days, Mr. Lal Narain Sinha, appearing on behalf of the respondent on August 4, 1983 fairly stated that the respondent management would agree to extend the companyerage of the award to the workmen employed in Lapanga Colliery.
