14665 of 1995 U in the High Court.
At that stage the respondent tenant raised an objection that the landlord did number have valid permit and permission to reconstruct the suit premises.
The appellant thereafter applied for execution of the decree.
So the tenant filed a revision application before the Appellate Authority.
The appellant is questioning the companyrectness of the order passed by the High Court of Kerala in O.P. No.
it held that the building plans submitted by the landlord were number companysistent with the provisions of the Kerala Building Rules and, therefore, the landlord cannot be said to be in possession of valid permit and permission from the companycerned authorities.
Aggrieved by that order the appellant filed O.P. No.
The objection was overruled by the executing companyrt.
The tenant also filed O.P. No.
Heard learned companynsel.
Leave granted.
The appeal filed by the tenant was dismissed by the Appellate authority and the Revision Petition filed in the High Court also met with the same fate.
14665 of 1995 U. He is the landlord and in the suit filed by him for eviction a decree was passed in his favour.
