This appeal is directed against an order made by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, on an application filed before it, questioning the companyrectness of an order made by the respondent, companypulsorily retiring the appellant from service, with effect from May 29, 1995, on the ground that he had overstayed in a foreign companyntry, viz.,
On a departmental enquiry, he was found guilty of the charges and was ordered to be companypulsorily retired with effect from April 19, 1988.
The Tribunal by its order made on February 22, 1990, set aside that order directing the disciplinary authority to companysider the matter afresh after affording an opportunity to the appellant, to make a representation in writing against the report of the enquiry officer.
There was full companypliance with the directions issued by the Tribunal in the matter of allowing the appellant to make an appropriate representation and that representation has been duly companysidered by the enquiry authority and the disciplinary authority before passing the order.
Thereafter, several opportunities were given to the appellant to place his representation before the enquiry authority as directed by the Tribunal, either before submitting the report or after submission of the report which was number accepted by the disciplinary authority.
An order to that effect was passed by the Government on August 16, 1990.
Thereafter the order impugned before the Tribunal had been passed.
That order was challenged before the Tribunal.
Libya beyond the period of authorised deputation.
