40 of 1981 ordering attachment of Execution Petition schedule mentioned properties.
Appellants, who were the petitioners before the High Court, are the judgment debtors.
The High Court took the view that the E.P. No.
Subsequently, EP No.
369 of 1986 was filed on 24.10.1986 but the same was dismissed for default on 28.3.1994.
369 of 1986 and other Execution Petitions.
177 of 1995 which was filed on 10.11.1995 was companytinuation of earlier E.P. No.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows Decree was passed on 22.4.1983 in OS No.
The respondent took the stand that the petition was within time permitted under Pondicherry Limitation Repeal of Local Law Act, 1994 in short the Act .
EP No.
40 of 1981.
The Revision Petition as numbered above was filed before the High Court which dismissed the same.
101 of 1984 was closed on 10.8.1984.
E.P. No.
3426/2007 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
238 of 1994 was filed on 29.4.1994 to restore the E.P. The said E.A. was dismissed as number pressed on 31.10.1994.
Appellants took the stand that the Execution Petition is barred by limitation.
Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court dismissing the Revision Petition filed by the appellants under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in short the CPC .Challenge in the Revision Petition was to the order of learned Additional Sub Judge, Pondicherry dated 7.7.2003 in Execution Petition No.
E.A. No.
177 of 1995 was filed on 10.11.1995.
The executing companyrt accepted the stand.
177 of 1995 in OS No.
Reference was made under Section 4 b i of the Act.
