The said suit was dismissed on 27.5.1977.
No appeal thereagainst was filed .
71/1978, was dismissed.
The basic fact of the matter is number in dispute.
In the second appeal which was filed by the appellant, the following purported questions of law were formulated Whether the suit for setting aside the order dated 29.6.69 in absence of any companysequential relief for possession was barred under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, in view of the decision of Supreme Court in case of Vinay Kirshna v. Keshav Chandra Anr.,
The reliefs prayed for in the said suits are On companysideration of the above facts the companyrt be pleased to set aside the order of the B.D.O., Pusa passed in case 1166/69 70 on 29.9.69 u s. 6 2 of the Act as being without jurisdiction and fraudulently obtained.
Any other relief or reliefs which may be deemed suitable a decree to that effect may be passed in favour of the plaintiff against the defendant.
20/1985 whereby the appeal from judgment and decree dated 14.3.1985 passed by the Munsif Court, Samastipur, in Title Suit No.
Another suit, however, was filed in the Court of Munsif II, Samastipur, which was marked as Title Suit No.
1 to 5 filed a suit for eviction against the appellant herein, purported to be one under Bihar Buildings Lease, Rent Eviction Control Act, 1947.
The appellant herein was a tenant under the respondents.
71/1978, on the premise that the said Parcha under Section 6 2 of the Act, was issued without jurisdiction and the same had been fraudulently obtained.
He was, however, said to be a landless person.
A Parcha was purported to have been granted on or about 29.9.1969 by the Collector of Samastipur District, in terms of the provisions of Section 6 of the Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy Act, 1947 the Act, for short , the father of the respondents Nos.
B. SINHA, J. The defendant in the suit is before us aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and decree dated 18.8.1999 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Second Appeal No.
29 of 1993 affirming the judgment and decree dated 20.1.1993 passed in Title Appeal No.
