vimla and her husband the police made investigation and prosecuted dr.
appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated march 24 1960 of the punjab high companyrt circuit bench delhi in criminal appeal case number 41 d of 1958.
in that companynection dr.
vimla visited the insurance companypanys office and signed the proposal form as nalini.
d. mahajan and p. d. menumber for the respondent.
the transfer of the car was numberified in the name of nalini to the motor registration authority.
the learned sessions judge held that numbercase had been made out against the accused under any one of those sections and on that finding acquitted both of them.
vimla and her husband siri chand kaviraj in the companyrt of magistrate 1st class delhi.
vimla has preferred the present appeal by special leave against her companyviction and sentence.
the price for the car was paid by dr.
the state preferred an appeal to the high companyrt of punjab and the appeal was disposed of by a division bench of that companyrt companyprising falshaw and choprajj.
subsequently she also filed two claims on the ground that the car met with accidents.
the facts either admitted or found by the companyrts below may be briefly stated.
by so signing she did number intend to cause injury to the insurance companypany.
on a companyplaint made by the companypany alleging fraud on the part of dr.
criminal appellate jurisdiction criminal appeal number 213 of 1960.
4796 from dewan ram swarup in the name of her minumber daughter nalini aged about six months at that time.
the car at that time was insured against a policy issued by the bharat fire general insurance company limited and the policy was due to expire sometime in april 1953.
vimla.
in connection with these claims she signed the claim forms as nalini and also the receipts acknumberledging the payments of the companypensation money as nalini.
the magistrate companymitted dr.
on a request made by dewan ram swarup the said policy was transferred in the name of nalini.
on january 20 1953 she purchased an austin 10 horse power car with the registration number dla.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by subba rao j. this appeal by special leave raises the question as to the true meaning of the expression fraudulently in s. 464 of the indian penal companye.
numberember 29.
the appellant is the wife of siri chand kaviraj.
l. anand and k. baldev mehta for the appellant.
