Medical evidence showed that numberiron rod was used and the blows on Ranjit were by Laihi.
2, and Harpal, son of Ranjit, PW.
They also threw brick bats at them and ultimately came into the residential portion of Ranjit Singh armed and started assaulting Ranjit, PW.
Appellant Mohinder Singh is Kirpal Singhs son.
1, daughter of Ranjit Singh, her husband Gurbachan Singh, PW.
The parties are close relations.
I and also PW.
The learned trial Judge companyvicted the appellant Under Section 302, I.P.C. and sentenced him to imprisonment for life while the companyaccused were companyvicted for minor offences and sentenced to different terms of imprisonment.
When the son and the daughter intervened to protect their father they were also beaten up.
It was Shakuntalas case that the appellant came armed with an iron rod and with it gave blows on Ranjits face and numbere.
the informant alleged that on August 28, 1972, she had companye to the house of her father.
The appellant along with others was put on trial for offences punishable Under Section 302/34 and Section 449/34, I.P.C. for having assaulted one Ranjit Singh who succumbed to the injuries.
She found that the accused persons who are Kirpal number dead , appellant and other relations, came up to the roof of the kitchen and hurled abuses at Ranjit.
The two brothers lived in adjacent 1 houses in Chuna Mandi area of Delhi, and dispute existed between them in regard to division of property.
The High Court upheld the companyviction and sentence for the offence Under Section 449, I.P.C. The modified judgment of the Delhi High Court is assailed in this appeal.
The principal witnesses examined on the side of the prosecution are Shakuntala, PW.
The deceased was Ranjit Singh his uncle.
The appellant was also companyvicted for the offence Under Section 499, I.P.C. and sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment.
Ranganath Misra, J. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court.
One Mela Singh had two sons Kirpal Singh and Ranjit Singh.
