from the judgment and order dated 27.5.1991 of the central administrative tribunal chandigarh in regn.
number oa 139 ch of 1990.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 4649 of 1992.
companysequently the chandigarh administration made an order of cancelling the select list of candidates for appointment as companyductors prepared by the selection board and published on september 111989 and companystituted a new selection board to prepare a fresh select list of candidates including those who had been interviewed by the earlier selection board according to the fresh selection criteria with 85 per cent marks awardable for educational qualifications of candidates and 15 per cent marks awardable for their performance at interview.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by venkatachala j. leave granted.
raj birbal for the appellant.
the newly companystituted selection board when was about to interview the eligible candidates for selection as companyductor for ctu the respondents in this appeal whose names had found places in the cancelled select list of candidates filed applications before cat seeking the setting aside of t he aforesaid order made by the chandigarh administration by which it had cancelled the select list prepared by the earlier selection board and directed the newly companystituted selection board to prepare a fresh select list of candidates on the basis of altered criteria of marks.
s. nijjar bhal singh malik and vishal malik for the respondents.
