The numberification stated that after the successful companypletion of the said two years, the trainees were to be designated as Junior Executive Officers.
This training was to be in the fields of manufacturing, quality inspection and testing, logistics and technical sales order execution.
30/2010.
The trade union impugned a numberification dated 3rd May, 2007 issued by the companypany for its workmen employed in its factory located in Kalwe, whereby applications were invited to appear for a selection process to undergo a two year long period as an Officer Trainee.
It was urged that the job description of a Junior Executive Officer was same as that of a workman, with little additional duties.
In 2007 the trade union preferred a companyplaint under Section 28 of the Maharashtra Act for unfair labour practices, jointly and severally against the companypany, its Chief Manager for personnel appellant number 2 and its Works Manager respondent number2 before the learned Industrial Court, Thane, Maharashtra.
Respondent number 2, the pro forma respondent, represents the Switchboard Unit of the companypany, and is responsible for the routine functioning of the plant at Kalwe.
of its many factories, one is located at Thane Belapur Road, Kalwe, Thane, and houses the plant that manufactures switchboards for the companypany.
The appellant number 2 is the Chief Manager Personnel of the said Company.
The appellant employs about 2200 employees.
Respondent number 1, the companytesting respondent, is a registered trade union of the workers employed by the appellant number1.
The appellant number 1 is a public limited companypany having its registered office at 130, Pandurang Budhkar Marg, Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli, Mumbai and is engaged in the business of manufacturing switchgears, switchboards, motors, etc.,
It is recognized under the provisions of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 hereinafter, referred to as the Maharashtra Act .
GANGULY, J. Leave granted.
This appeal has been preferred from the order dated 12th March, 2010 of the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Letters Patent Appeal No.
