20 lakhs and had number repaid the same.
P.C. for quashing the I.CR No.
5 of 2004 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patan, on the plea of double jeopardy for the reason that the appellant has already been tried and dealt with under the provisions of Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 hereinafter referred as N.I. Act for the same offence.
Hence, this appeal.
In the criminal case No.1334 of 2003 filed under Section 138 of I. Act, the trial companyrt companyvicted the appellant.
12 of 2006, before the District Judge wherein, he has been acquitted.
1334 of 2003 under Section 138 of N.I. Act on the ground that the appellant had taken hypothecation loan of Rs.
18 of 2004 and Criminal Case No.
2 filed a companyplaint dated 22.10.2003 i.e. Criminal Case No.
Against the order of acquittal, respondent number 2 has preferred Criminal Appeal No.
Appellant filed an application under Section 482 Cr.
Subsequent thereto on 6.2.2004, the respondent number 2 filed an FIR being I.C.R. No.
Aggrieved, appellant preferred Appeal No.
Facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are that Respondent No.
Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J. This appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 18.8.2011 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Misc.
Application No.
7807 of 2006, by which the High Court has dismissed the application filed by the present appellant under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 hereinafter referred as Cr.
In order to meet the said liability, the appellant issued cheque bearing number 59447 and on being presented, the cheque has been dishonoured.
