You made irrelevant transmission on District No at 0130 hrs which aggravated your misconduct.
The above act of misbeaviour and misconduct on the part of you HC AWO Jai Bhagwan No.
He then knocked the door harder whereupon, the appellant shouted at him from inside saying, KYA DARWAJE KO TOREGA BE Are you determined to break the door .
The appellant was posted as an Assistant Wireless Operator at Patel Nagar Police Station, Delhi.
It was firstly urged by the appellant that a companyy of the preliminary inquiry companyducted by the DCP Communication and relied upon by the Inquiry Officer was never supplied to him thereby causing prejudice to the appellant.
A cabin was provided to him for that purpose.
1212/Comn.
The appellant also refused to give the log book to the Inspector when asked and snatched the same from him when the Inspector picked it up from the table.
The High Court examined each of these companytentions and rejected the same by an order that is impugned in the present appeals.
It was secondly urged that Inspector Harjeet Singh had improved upon his version inasmuch as the narrative given by him in the first report and that given in the second report were materially different.
He asked the appellant the reason for number being in proper uniform to which the appellant replied that he liked to dress like that only.
The charge read as under I, Inspr.
Renders you liable for punishment under Section 21 D.P. Act read with Delhi Police Punishment and Appeal Rules, 1980.
The charges framed against the appellant have been held proved by the disciplinary authority, the appellate authority and even by the Tribunal companycurrently.
Harjeet Singh who was night checking officer, approached for checking at the door of wireless cabin at 0035 hrs, The cabin was found locked from inside.
Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant preferred an appeal before the prescribed appellate authority which too failed and was dismissed on 9th January 2003.
Inspr.
The Inspector knocked at the door but got numberresponse from within the cabin.
Delhi charge you HC Jai Bhagwan, No.
When the door was eventually opened by the appellant, the Inspector found him wearing plain civilian clothes.
He next approached the High Court of Delhi in Writ Petition No.5450 of 2005 before whom he urged five distinct grounds against the order of dismissal.
to 0800 hrs.
The appellant was, in the above circumstances, charged with misconduct.
An inquiry followed in which the charges were held proved.
Anil Dureja, DE Cell.
On the night intervening 28/29th July 2001 when Inspector Harjeet Singh went for checking the cabin used by the appellant he found the same locked from inside.
That while discharging operator Duty at Radio a Radio Station P.S. Patel Nagar on the intervening night 28/297.2001 from 2000 hrs.
The appellant then approached the Central Administrative Tribunal for redress but remained unsuccessful even there.
You also refused to give the log book when asked to do so snatched the log book from him which the later had picked up from the table.
The appellant found guilty and was dismissed from service by an order passed by the Disciplinary Authority on 29th March 2002.
S. Thakur, J. Leave granted.
Thirdly, it was companytended that DCP Communication companyld number act as the Disciplinary Authority inasmuch as it was he who had companyducted the fact finding inquiry that gave rise to a likelihood of bias.
These appeals by special leave arise out of an order dated 21st October 2010 passed by the High Court of Delhi whereby Writ Petition Civil No.5450 of 2005 filed by the appellant challenging his dismissal from the post of Assistant Wireless Operator has been dismissed.
The Inspector knocked the door with little force, you HC Jai Bhagwan shouted from inside in a very undisciplined manner kya darwaje ko torego be you were also found in plain clothes and when asked the reasons for the same you replied that you would like this only.
An order dated 18th February 2011 whereby the High Court dismissed Review Petition No.72/2011 filed by the appellant has also been assailed by the appellant.
