The actual date of execution of the deed of mortgage was number known to the plaintiffs respondents.
However, the said mortgaged properties were mutated in the name of the mortgagees on or about 19.3.1913.
In the written statement, the respondent denied and disputed the relationship between the parties, stating Para No.1 of the plaint is wrong and incorrect.
3322 OF 2008 Arising out of SLP C No.1395 of 2007 B. Sinha, J. Leave granted.
Sohan Singh and Bahadur Singh were the original mortgagors.
The defendant claimed the ownership as also possession of the suit land in himself.
A suit for redemption of the said mortgage was filed by the respondents on or about 30.12.1970.
REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO.
Respondents filed the aforementioned suit for a decree for redemption of mortgage on payment of a sum as may be found due to the appellants herein.
What would be the period of limitation in a suit for redemption of mortgage in the factual matrix involved in the present case is the question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 19.7.2006 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in RSA No.1340 of 1980.
A transaction of mortgage in respect of the suit property admeasuring 58 kanals 11 marlas was entered into by and between the predecessors in the interest of the parties herein.
