Being aggrieved by number consideration of his case, Dr. Garg approached the Administrative Tribunal, which was registered as O.A. No.
The State as well as two other private respondents before the Tribunal have preferred these appeals.
On 2.12.92, one Dr. Patni was promoted as Professor of Prosthetics.
213 of 1995.
On 29.11.94, Dr. Garg was informed that the matter of holding a Departmental Promotion Committee to companysider his case is being companysidered by the Government.
Dr. Garg filed a representation on 16.1.95.
18 of 1993.
The Departmental Promotion Committee again sat in May, 1994 and companysidered and selected Dr. Desh Raj Jain, appellant in one of the appeals as Reader in Prosthetics and the case of Dr. Garg was number companysidered.
213 of 1995.
The said application having been disposed of by the impugned order with the directions as already stated, the present appeals have been preferred.
PATTANAIK, J. These appeals are directed against the Judgment dated 5.9.95 of the Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Indore Bench in O.A. No.
1 in these appeals for promotion to the post of Reader by the Departmental Promotion Committee and if found eligible, to give him his due seniority.
The said Principal made a fresh request on 24.10.91 and again on 3.5.92 and finally the Departmental Promotion Committee sat on 25.9.92 but even in that meeting, case of Dr. Garg was number companysidered and by order dated 2.12.92, Dr. Saxena and Dr. Dhodapkar were promoted as Readers in Oral Pathology and Periodontia respectively.
This order of the Tribunal was assailed by Dr. Garg by filing Special Leave Petition No.
15892 of 1994 in this Court, which however was dismissed on 26.9.94.
The appellant in each of these appeals was respondent in the original application before the Tribunal.
As the said representation was number disposed of, he approached the Administrative Tribunal by filing an application under Section 9 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, which was registered as O.A. No.
That application was disposed of by the Tribunal by order dated 28.2.94 with the directions that Dr. Garg should be companysidered for promotion to the post of Reader along with others who are eligible and the Government shall have the discretion to determine the guidelines for selection of the candidates, keeping in view the specific teaching requirement in the College of Dentistry.
