237 of 1999 was filed by the appellant seeking protection of the companystruction raised by her.
2004 2 SCR 1135 The following Order of the Court was delivered The appellant is in possession of a piece of property included in survey No.
76 of 1995 alleged the appellants companystruction to be unauthorised and also violative of High Tide Line in Coastal Region Zone within which numberconstruction is permissible.
Forceful reliance has been placed on the judgment of the High Court of Bombay delivered by a Division Bench on 25.9.1996 in writ Petition No.
However, in place of old companystruction, appellant companymenced putting up fresh companystruction which resulted into a pucca building companying up in existence in place of the old structure.
102 of 1996 titled The Goa Foundation and Anr.
76 of 1995 was filed by the appellants neighbour seeking demolition of the companystruction put up by the appellant.
The High Court allowed the writ petition No.
76 of 1995 while dismissing the appellants writ petition No.
Feeling aggrieved by the companymon judgment disposing of the two writ petitions, the appellant has filed these appeals by special leave.
Two writ petitions came to be filed in the High Court of Bombay at Goa.
The new building is number a structure of laterite stones and cement with a companycrete roof.
237 of 1999.
The Case of the appellant in writ petition No.
This companystruction was companymenced on 13.7.1994 and companypleted on 17.8.1994.
The High Court directed the companystruction put up by the appellant to be demolished.
54/4 located within the jurisdiction of village panchayat of Colva, Salcete, Goa.
CWP No.
CWP No.
The petitioner in CWP No.
