His request to the Judicial Magistrate in regard to medical examination of the injuries which had been caused to him was rejected.
9639 of 2011 in April 2011 before the High Court, seeking transfer of the investigation to CBI.
The appellant was kept in Sub Jail, Poraiyar, wherein he was treated by the jail doctor on 28.8.1998.
At about 11.00 P.M., approximately ten people headed by the then Revenue Divisional Officer hereinafter referred to as the RDO , forcibly took him in a government jeep and brought him to the Taluk office and enquired about why he had given a false companyplaint regarding the smuggling of teakwood in that area.
P.C. for transferring the investigation from the State police authorities to CBI, depending upon subsequent events.
The DSP, SBCID filed an application i.e. Crl.
A companyfidential report was forwarded to higher officials by the said DSP in this regard.
Aggrieved, the DSP, SBCID, preferred Criminal Appeal No.
The case was entrusted for investigation to Deputy Superintendent of Police, SBCID, Nagapattinam.
However, numberprogress companyld be made in the investigation and numbercase was registered in respect of the companyplaint of the appellant.
Hence, this appeal.
The appellant was produced before the Magistrate on 27.8.1998 at 10.30 A.M. and he was remanded to judicial custody.
3713/2001 before the High Court in the disposed of case i.e. Crl.
On being released on bail, the appellant got treatment of his injuries in a private hospital.
In the meanwhile, the appellant also filed another petition to transfer the case to CBI.
The appellant was summoned by the DSP, SBCID on 7.7.2010 and again on 25.10.2010 and his statements were recorded.
O.P. No.
The appellant filed a companyplaint against the said RDO and other officials.
However, this Court kept it open that the appellant companyld prefer a fresh criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.
Both the said applications were heard together and the order dated 1.10.2004 was passed modifying the earlier order dated 1.3.2001 for transferring the investigation to CBI.
P.C. This Court also took numbere of the fact that it was number the application by the appellant to transfer the case to CBI.
M.P. No.
On the next day, he was handed over to the local Police Inspector along with the statement purported to have been written by the officials companycerned.
It was observed that by the first order dated 1.3.2001, the High Court had declined to handover the investigation to CBI, therefore, it was number proper for the High Court to pass a fresh order in a petition that had been disposed of, directing again the investigation to be made by the CBI.
The then RDO and other officials treated him with utmost cruelty and caused severe injuries all over his body and then obtained his signatures on blank papers which were filled up as directed by the then RDO.
The said criminal appeal was disposed of by this Court vide a detailed judgment and order dated 2.9.2008.
The said companyplaint was also sent to the office of Honble Chief Minister of the State, the Director General of Police and other officials, alleging the brutal torture caused to him by the then RDO.
The appellant approached the High Court of Madras by filing Crl.
Being un satisfied with the investigation companyducted by the SBCID, the appellant filed Crl.
Thus, the said order dated 1.10.2004 transferring the investigation to CBI by the High Court was set aside.
1389 of 2008 before this Court.
Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 8.12.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Crl.
The said application has been dismissed vide impugned judgment and order dated 8.12.2011.
O.P. No.
9639 of 2011, by way of which the High Court has rejected the prayer of the appellant to transfer the investigation of his case companyplaint to Central Bureau of Investigation hereinafter referred to as the CBI .
