The defendants alleged that the said invoices were accepted by the plaintiff thus resulting in a binding arbitration agreement.
The said invoices have numberhing to do with the suit transactions.
The three invoices relied on by the defendants, on the other hand, relate to sale of goods by the proprietary companycern of second defendant to the plaintiff.
The only reason assigned by the petitioner, a seasoned businessman, to explain the delay is that he was companyfused by diverse opinions about filing of special leave petition.
V. Raveendran J. Dismissal of an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 the Act for short , filed by the defendants in a money suit filed by the first respondent herein against three defendants, that is, third respondent companypany, and its two directors namely, petitioner and second respondent , affirmed by the High Court, has led to the filing of this special leave petition.
