The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ghaziabad for short, the District Forum by its order dated 20th January, 1999, partly allowed the companyplaint filed by respondent Urmila and directed Ghaziabad Development Authority hereinafter referred to as the Authority to remove the defects in the house allotted to the respondent with the stipulation that if the needful is number done, then decision will be taken in the execution proceedings for award of the amount spent by the companyplainant on removal of the defects.
The District Forum further directed the Authority to pay interest to the respondent at the rate of 15 per cent per annum for the period from 1st April, 1995 to 6th September, 1996 on the amount deposited by her up to 31st March, 1995 and Rupees four thousand towards mental agony and companyt of litigation as, in its opinion, there was delay on the part of the Authority in delivering possession of the house to the respondent.
The said order was companyfirmed in appeal by 2/ 2 the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, U.P. for short, the State Commission and when the matter was taken in revision before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for short, the National Commission , the same has been dismissed.
Civil Appeal No.3727 of 2004 Heard learned companynsel for the parties.
Hence, this appeal by special leave.
