Besides, a detailed companynter was also filed in the writ petition in which it was stated that the claim of the respondent for promotion was misconceived since such a promotion to the post of Associate Professor under the relevant rule were required to be made by the Public Service Commission or by Departmental Promotion Committee.
134 HME dated 25.2.86, he was promoted as Assistant Professor on ad hoc basis.
2452/92 before the High Court of Jammu Kashmir at Srinagar inter alia seeking ad hoc promotion to the post of Associate Professor with effect from 14.3.89.
It also passed an interim order directing the State Government and the appellant herein to grant ad hoc promotion to the respondent to the post of Associate Professor.
The learned Judge also directed the Government advocate Additional Advocate General, representing the appellant, should number appear on behalf of the appellant in the said companytempt petition to defend him and on the companytrary should assist the companyrt.
When the companytempt proceedings came up for hearing on 1.9.93, the learned Judge passed an order directing issue of number bailable warrants and framed rule in the said companytempt petition.
On 8.3.93 the High Court issued numberice on the companytempt petition and called upon the appellant to implement the Order dated 21.9.92.
It was urged in the writ petition that promotion granted to various other persons were arbitrary and he had been denied such a promotion despite having requisite experience.
On 21.9.92, the High Court issued numberice on the writ petition.
It was made clear that this period of deputation on foreign assignment companyld number be companynted as against teaching experience.
He filed writ petition No.
He was in Saudi Arbia for a period of two years and ten months.
The learned Judge declined to accept the unqualified apology tendered by the appellant till the order dated 21.9.92 was implemented and the appellant purged himself of companytempt.
304 HME dated 7.4.89.
The said period was treated as on deputation without pay and allowances.
He took up foreign assignment with Subya General Hospital at Saudi Arabia.
The respondent was companyfirmed on the post of Assistant Professor with retrospective effect from 25.1.87.
It was directed that he will be entitled to companynt the said deputation towards increments and other service benefits.
The further companytention was that it was wrong on the part of the Government in number companynting period of foreign assignment as against his teaching experience.
In March, 1993 for number implementing this order, companytempt proceedings were initiated by the respondent.
The short facts are as under The respondent was appointed as Lecturer in the Faculty of Medicine, Medical College, Srinagar, under Order No.
It was further urged that he did number possess the requisite qualifications experience eligible for promotion.
Thereafter his services as such came to be regularised on the basis of the recommendation of the Public Service Commission as per Government Order No.
By Government Order No.
The appellant filed his companynter in the companytempt proceedings.
More than above this, the post of Associate professor was a selection post.
197 ME of 1981.
Against the order dated 1.9.93 referred to above, S.L.P. No.
The companytempt proceedings were adjourned to 27.9.93 and it was directed that the appellant be present in the companyrt on the said date.
Aggrieved by this order, S.L.P. No.
On 13.9.93, the appellant was personally present in the companyrt.
15573/93 has companye to be preferred.
