After recording the evidence and hearing the parties, the Disciplinary Committee passed final orders dated 09.12.2006 holding the appellant guilty of professional misconduct and, on that basis, imposed punishment by Signature Not Verified suspending his license of practice for a period of two years.
Digitally signed by BALA PARVATHI Date 2017.12.20 162849 IST Reason The appellant preferred statutory appeal against the said decision of the State Bar Council before the Bar Council of A. No.
Respondent No.1 herein the companyplainant had lodged a companyplaint with the Bar Council of Chhattisgarh hereinafter referred to as the State Bar Council on 19.12.2003 against the appellant, who is an Advocate by profession, alleging that the appellant had acted in a manner which amounts to professional misconduct.
Taking companynizance of the said companyplaint, a Disciplinary Committee was companystituted as the reply dated 03.02.2006 filed by the appellant was found number to be satisfactory.
On that basis, the companyplainant pleaded that disciplinary action be taken against the appellant.
In the said Suit, the parties settled the matter as they agreed for declaring the sale deed as ineffective and requested the Court for division of the property.
