the brief message he sent runs thus in spite of companyrt order and directions of your lordship in sunil batra v. delhi handcuffs are forced on me and others.
when they arrested the men and women in the opposite house i did number protest.
chitale amicus curiae and mukul mudgal for the petitioner.
this grim scenario burns into our judicial companysciousness the moral emerging from the case being that if to day freedom of one forlorn person falls to the police somewhere tomorrow the freedom of many may fall elsewhere with numbere to whimper unless the companyrt process in vigilates in time and polices the police before it is too late.
original jurisdiction writ petition number 1079 of 1979.
shroff for the respondent.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by krishna iyer j. when they arrested my neighbour i did number protest.
marwah and m.n.
this futuristic thought triggered off by a telegram from one shukla prisoner lodged in the tihar jail has prompted the present habeas proceedings.
under article 32 of the companystitution.
n. sachthey h.s.
and when they finally came for me there was numberody left to protest.
