The Tribunal by the judgment under challenge, without going into the merits of the case, quashed the impugned G.o.
on the short ground that the impugned G.O. was hit by Section 19 4 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1998 Present Honble Mr. Justice K.Venkataswami Honble Mr. Justice A.P.Misra Nageswara Rao, V.Sridhar Reddy, G.Ramakrishna Prasad, and Uday Kumar Sagar, Advs.
7112/92 dated 2.12.1992 wherein neither the third respondent herein number V.V. Subbareddy, who is also referred to in the impugned G.O. figure among the Respondents.
for the Respondent.
Their companymon grievance was against the order of the Andhra Pradesh Government in G.O. Rt.
I Department dated 28.11.1994.
for State of A.P. J U D G E M E N T The following Judgment of the Court was delivered Venkataswami, J. These appeals by special leave are directed against the companymon judgment of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad dated 13.7.1995 in O.A. Nos.
1881, Revenue Endowments.
Ram Kumar, Ms. Asha G. Nair, C.Balasubramanian, Subba Rao, Santi Narayana, Advs.
for the appellant Subba Rao, A.D.N. Rao, D.Prakash Reddy, Ms. D.Bharathi Reddy, Advs.
252, 277, 412, 447 and 783 of 1995.
By the impugned Government order, the Government of Andhra Pradesh at the instance of the appellant herein gave him seniority in Executive officers Grade IV over the companytesting unofficial respondents in these appeals.
The companytesting unofficial respondents in each of the appeals in this Court were the applicants before the Tribunal.
1881 dated 28.11.1994 make a reference to the interim order passed by this Tribunal in O.A. No.
