Subse quently, he was promoted to the post of District Inspector of LoCal fund Accounts.
1932 should be substituted by 27.8.
1263 dated 6.5.
The Director of Treasuries and Accounts after company sidering all relevant documents relied upon by the respond ent, and also the companyments of officers, rejected the re spondents prayer for alteration of his date of birth by his Order No.
The respondent thereupon submitted a revised application on 24.9.
The authori ties advised the respondent to submit a revised application in terms of the instructions companytained in the Government Order No.
From the Judgment and Order dated 18.10.1985 of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad in R.P. No.
At the time of his joining service 9.3.
1932 was recorded as his date of birth in the service book on the basis of S.S.L.C. Certificate.
699 18/1209/Admn/66 7 dated 5.1.1968 on the ground that the companyrectness of respondents eider brothers date of birth was number established.
He made an appli cation on 5.1.
1964 for alteration of his date of birth, that application was forwarded to the Head Master of the School in which the respondent had last studied for verification.
After obtaining the views of all authorities including the Head Master of the School, the respondents case was placed before the Director of Treas uries and Accounts, the Head of Department for necessary orders.
1962 for alteration of his date of birth as entered in his service book, on the ground that his date of birth as recorded in his service book was apparently wrong and incorrect in view of his eider brothers date of birth, who was also in Government service, recorded as 2.9.
Aggrieved the appellants have preferred this appeal by special leave.
On these findings the Tribunal directed the appellants to companysider the respondents application again for the altera tion of his date of birth on the basis of the extracts of the entry in the births and deaths register.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The respondent urged that the entry with regard to his date of birth in the service book should be altered and the date 9.3.
After his selection and appointment he companymenced his train ing with effect from 12.11.
S. Nambiar and T.V.S.N. Chari with him for the Appellants.
On companypletion of his training he was posted as Audit Clerk on 26.1.
915 of 1987.
786 of 1984.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SINGH, J. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hydera bad dated October 18, 1985 declaring Rule 5 of the Andhra Pradesh Public Employment Recording and alteration of date of birth Rules 1984 hereinafter referred to as 1984 Rules void and directing the appellants to companysider the respondents application for alteration of his date of birth in the service records in accordance with the extracts from birth register maintained under the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act, 1886.
Respondent In person.
The respondent was appointed, as Audit Clerk in the Department of Examiner of Accounts, Local Fund Accounts, through a companypetitive examination held in the year 1956.
1933 which accord ing to him was the companyrect date of his birth.
