When the orders of detention were challenged, primarily on the ground that the exceptional circumstances and the reasons recorded by the District Magistrate were number companymunicated to the detenu, the order of detention was held violative of Article 22 5 and the High Court by the impugned order dated June 9, 1987 enlarged the respondents from detention.
The facts are that the respondents were detained under Section 3 1 of the National Security Act, 1980 for short, the Act , by proceedings of the District Magistrate, Jaisalmer dated January 7, 1987.
The detenu made his representation on January 20, 1987 to the State Government which was rejected on February 2, 1987.
He made a representation to the Advisory Board on February 9, 1987 and it was companysidered and rejected on February 19, 1987.
The State Government companyfirmed the order of detention on March 13, 1987 for a period of one year w.e.f January 7, 1987.
These appeals by special leave arise from the Division Bench judgment of the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur in Writ Petition Nos.831/87 and batch.
The grounds of detention with the material were supplied on January 16, 1987.
The exceptional circumstance were recorded on January 11, 1987 for number supply of the ground and documents to the detenu.
It is number necessary to go into the other grounds since the reference is on the companyrectness of the view taken by a Bench of two Judges of this Court in Battis case.
In this case reasons have been recorded.
