Appellant, Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Limited hereinafter referred to as the appellant is the successor of erstwhile Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board for short the Board .
Accordingly, the Board framed a scheme and issued the same by Office Memo No.
16523 of 1993 by a Full Bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh wherein the High Court has held that the respondent writ petitioner was eligible to be companysidered for the post of LDC Revenue Cashier and a direction has been given to the appellant to appoint the respondent in one of the posts of LDC Revenue Cashier within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the companyy of the order impugned therein.
He was number a graduate at the time when he had worked as a casual labourer with the Board in the year 1976.
It was stated that he had filed representations on 22.1.1990, 22.8.1990, 8.2.1991, 11.1992 and 18.3.1993 with companyies to the Minister for Power and some other officials companycerned, but, the same were number replied to by the Board.
Another ground taken was that he had been discriminated against inasmuch as certain other ex casual labourers who had worked for lesser number of days than him had been absorbed whereas the same was denied to him.
Since he was number a graduate at the time when he had worked as a casual labourer and he had also number intimated to the Board about his graduation, his name was companysidered in the first category and included in the companyprehensive list prepared in the companycerned Division.
Board in his companynter affidavit denied the receipt of any representation from the respondent.
Casual labourers were divided into two categories.
OSD P DA.I A3/1138/85 1 dated 26.8.1985.
None of them was on record.
He did his graduation in the year 1981 82.
The sole respondent, the ex casual labourer, had worked with the Board on daily wage basis for a period of 47 days from 1.5.1976 to 30.6.1976.
The companycerned Divisional Engineer submitted the final list prepared by him to the Superintending Engineer who in turn submitted the same to the board.
The Board entered into an agreement with the workers Union for absorption of ex casual labourers against regular vacant posts arising from time to time for operation Maintenance and Construction Establishments posts.
Appointment orders were to be issued after taking approval from the Board.
J U D G M E N T BHAN, J. This appeal is directed against the final order and judgment dated 17th July, 1999 in Writ Petition No.
