paragraph 3 of the order specifically states that the above promotions will be personal to the officers companycerned and the posts presently held by them will stand upgraded to the supertime grade in the scale of rs.5900 6700 plus number practising allowance rs.950 p.m. in terms of ministrys order number a 11011/5/88 chs iv dated 15.3.1989.
on 20.9.1989 in accordance with the guidelines dated 10.3.89 the departmental promotion companymittee met for selection of officers for the promotion to the super time grade posts of director professor in the central health service.
were to be intimated to the ministry within one month.
d.d.s.
5900 6700 plus number practising allowance rs.950 p.m. the dates of promotions were indicated against each of the appointee.
aggrieved by the order dated 17.1.1990 the first respondent dr.
kulapathy 5th respondent outstanding where respondents 2 to 5 are rated outstanding they go en bloc above the first respondent since the first respondent is merely very good.
rana dr.
p. rajaram the first respondent was assigned rank number 13 while dr.
consequent upon the selection by union public service by an order dated 17.1.1990 the president was pleased to appoint under rule 4 10 of the central health services rules 1982 the officers of specialist grade i of the teaching specialist sub cadre of the central health service to supertime grade of the teaching specialist sub cadre of the central health service.
jain and dr.
from the order dated 20.1.1992 of the central administrative tribunal madras in o.a number 925 of 1900.
in the eligibility list include dr.
the first respondent when he was put on numberice should have immediately voiced his protest.
this will companytinue till the upgraded posts are held by the officers being promoted number.
the first respondent dr.
after the creation of these posts proposals were sent to the union public service commission for companyvening the meetings of the departmental promotion companymittee for selection of the candidates for promotion.
khalilullah the third respondent was assigned the rank number 24.
the president of india sanctioned 35 posts in super time grade of central health services in the scale of rs.5900 200 6700 plus number practising allowance at the numbermal rates as admissible to other similar posts.
oberoi and b.s.
tulsi addl.
rajaram at serial number 14 on the basis of merit.
number 7138/92 is preferred by union of india while s.l.p.
they were director g.b.
each extension was for a period of one year.
the sanction was companyveyed by the under secretary to the government of india ministry of health and welfare new delhi on 26.8.1987.
d.d.s.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number.
m. khalilullah was assigned rank number4 and the date of promotion was as 1.4.1989.
rana 2nd respondent outstanding dr.
they were posted as director professors on an officiating basis in the pay scale of rs.
m. khalilullah 3rd respondent outstanding dr.
raja ram was served with a companyy of letter dated 3.11.1988.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by mohan j. leave granted.
earlier to this amendment these posts in the teaching specialist sub cadre were alone open to professors from all specialities.
ultimately by an order dated 2.4.1992 it has been extended for a period of one year up to 28.2.1993.
4507 and 4508 of 1992.
the sanction was upto 29.2.98.
jain 4th respondent outstanding dr.
rajaram the first respondent is concerned he was assigned rank number 14 and the date of promotion was as 1.4.1989 while respondent number 3 dr.
number 6494/92 is filed by the affected party dr.
gupta for the respondents.
s.l.p.
in that application he had stated that he was senior to dr.
rajaram preferred an application number 925 of 1988 on 6.7.1990.
solicitor general kapil sibal v.s. rao c. ramesh and ranjit kumar for the appellant.
number 7138/92.
as far as dr.
the union public service companymission approved to amend rule 4 6 of central health service rules of 1982.
it requires to be stated that these posts were extended from time to time.
both these appeals can be dealt with by a companymon judgment since identical issues are involved.
raja ram was rated as very good while the rating for the other doctors is as follows dr.
p. rap v. balachandran r.p.
they are directed against the judgment of the judgment central administrative tribunal madras dated 23.1.1992.
m. khalilullah dr.
