He approached the CAT, Ahmedabad Bench in O.S. No.51/1994 and same are the facts in all other cases.
3392, 3391, 3387, 3389, 3388 AND 3390 OF 1996 Arising out of SLP C Nos.
Thus these appeals by special leave.
2431/94 Leave granted.
2431 OF 1994 O R D E R A. NOS.
6163/93, 2593/94, 10190, 1918, 17577, 1919/95 AND CIVIL APPEAL NO.
Under Section 25F, numbernotice was issued terminating the service number retrenchment companypensation was paid, therefore, the respondent is entitled to reinstatement and it would be open to the appellant to take action against him according to the relevant provisions of the Act.
The respondent came to be appointed as a substitute w.e.f.
Shri N.G. Malik, E.D. Packer was recruited on September 21, 1991 and sent for training from September 23, 1991 to October 2, 1991.
The Tribunal by its impugned order dated May 12, 1994 allowed the case, set aside the orders of termination of Sailesh Kumar on the ground that the appellant is an industry, the respondent is a workman governed by the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for short, the Act .
WITH A.NOS.
We have heard the learned companynsel on both sides.
3389, 3390, 3387, 3388 AND 3392 of 1996 SLP Nos.1918, 1919, 10190 and 17577/95, 6163/93 and A. No.
September 21, 1991 without observing any formality of appointment, as a stop gap arrangement.
On August 2, 1993, without numberice, he was terminated from service.
