The respondent filed a writ petition in the Punjab High Court challenging cl.
The appellants have preferred the present appeal from this order after obtaining a certificate from the High Court.
Appeal from the judgment and order dated January 31, 1961 of the Punjab High Court Circuit Bench at Delhi in Letters Patent Appeal No.
His decision was affirmed on Letters Patent Appeal by a Division Bench of the High Court.
ww of S. 68 2 and the aforesaid numberification on various grounds and asking for an order qua shing the numberification.
Chapter IV of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 provides for companytrol of transport vehicles.
15 D of 1958.
He held that the clause was ultra vires and invalid and therefore the numberification issued under it was also invalid.
R L. Iyengar and S. P. Nayar, for the appellants.
CIVIL APPELLATE, JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
466 of 1965.
Mohan Behari Lal, for the respondent.
Under this numberification, the respondent and other agents engaged in the business of companylecting, forwarding and distributing goods carried by public carriers are required to take out licences.
On October 27, 1956, the Chief Commissioner, Delhi issued a numberification under S. 68 2 ww of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.
C.1.168 10 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Bachawat, J. The respondent carries on the business of company lecting, forwarding and distributing goods carried by public carriers in Delhi.
