The writ petition preferred by the appellants came to be dismissed vide order dated 19th January, 2002.
The Development Authority executed a lease deed dated 2nd April, 1988 in favour of Shri Rajendra Kumar Srivastava in relation to Plot No.778, Block A, Sector XIV, New Okhla Industrial Development Area, District Ghaziabad, admeasuring about 274.37 square meters as per the boundaries described in the deed.
These appeals demonstrate some of the instances of widespread violation of statutory provisions and somewhat arbitrary exercise of power by the Development Authority.
After raising the companystruction on the plot in question, admittedly, the appellants have put the property to a different use other than residential.
Lack of adoption of uniform application of law has resulted in large number of cases of violation of law all over the State of Uttar Pradesh going unnoticed.
6963 of 2005 and Civil Appeal arising out of SLP C No.9150 of 2007, after giving numberice, it had passed an order requiring the parties companycerned to stop the misuse within the stipulated time, failing which appropriate action in accordance with law, including cancellation of the lease deed, would be taken.
The time has companye for the Development Authorities to change their style of functioning and act vigilantly and uniformly, that too, strictly in accordance with law, keeping in view the larger public interest.
on a 100 metres wide road on such terms and companyditions as may be imposed by the Development Authority.
Introductory Facts This judgment shall dispose of the above referred four civil appeals and the applications for intervention therein.
This also provided for levying certain additional charges for granting such permission.
It is number even the case of the appellants before us that the Development Authority had granted any specific permission to them to use the property for any purpose other than residential.
Out of the four appeals, in Civil Appeal No.
The matter rested at that.
The property was rented out to two different companymercial undertakings, i.e., Andhra Bank and a companypany by the name Akariti Infotech.
24029 of 2005, the lease deed in favour of the parties had been cancelled by the Development Authority while in other two appeals, Civil Appeal No.
The ambit and scope of power of New Okhla Industrial Development Authority for short, the Development Authority to permit users, other than residential, in the sectors specifically earmarked for residential use in the Master Plan of the New Okhla Industrial Development Area for short, the Development Area is the basic question that falls for companysideration of this Court in this bunch of appeals.
Based on this proposal, it is stated that a public numberice was issued and objections were invited.
6962 of 2005and Civil Appeal arising out of SLP C No.
This was number finalized.
Swatanter Kumar, J. Leave granted in both the Special Leave Petitions.
