Pending suit, they sought ad interim injunction number to dispossess them from the hotel.
On appeal filed by the respondents, the learned single Judge vacated the status quo order by order dated May 18, 1995.
Therefore, the bar under Sec.
Feeling aggrieved the appellant filed Letters Patent Appeal.
These appeals by special leave arise from the judgment and order of the High Court of Orissa, made on December 16, 1996 in A.H.O. Nos.
The trial Court by order dated July 12, 1994 granted status quo whereby the appellant remained in possession of the suit premises.
Thus this appeal by special leave.
By the impugned order the Division Bench has held that the appeals are number maintainable.
The admitted facts are that the appellant had filed a suit for declaration that the steps taken by the respondents under section 29 of the State Financial Corporation Act were illegal and sought permanent injunction restraining them from disturbing its possession.
Leave granted.
Shri A.M. Singhvi, learned Addl, Solicitor General appearing for the appellant, companytents that under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent an appeal would lie against the judgment of the learned single Judge to the Division Bench.
Though the order granting status quo by the trial companyrt was vacated by the High Court, it is a judgment within the meaning of Section 2 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for short, the Code.
40 42/95.
