The landlord filed a suit in 1966 for eviction of the tenant for personal occupation and today after 31 years, we are disposing of the matter at the level of this companyrt.
When a numberice was issued by the landlady appellant calling upon the respondents to vacate the premised on the above grounds, reply came with the allegation is number in need in arrears of the rents and the appellant is number in need of the premise.
The application was filed on two grounds, namely, one she needs the premises for personal occupation and the tenant also has companymitted default in the payment of the rent for more than six months.
But, on appeal, the District Judge dismissed the appeal holding that the respondent needs the houses for personal occupation and also the default was companymitted by him.
Though an application under Section 11 for fixation of the standard rent was number filed, the determination in that behalf was made at Rs.
On revision, the High companyrt reversed the order.
In the written statement, a defence was taken that the standard rent.
This is one of the classic instances of the cases holding the law that delay defeats justice.
The rent from April 1, 1997 shall be paid on or before the 10th of every succeeding months Rs.3,500/ per month.The Rent companytroller allowed the petition.
Therefore, he has number companymitted default in payment of the rent.
As a companysequence, the rent payable to the respondent was less.
Thus, this appeal by special leave.
101/ per month.
Thus, necessitated the respondent to file the suit for eviction.
