2353 of 1990.
The factum of the execution of the Will having been denied and disputed by the numberices, the said application was companyverted into a suit and marked as O.S. No.
2004 Supp 3 SCR 175 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B. SINHA, J. Interpretation of Section 61 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 for short, the said Act falls for companysideration in this appeal which arises out of a Judgment and order dated 25.5.1999 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka in Misc.
The High Court also rejected the companytention raised on behalf of the appellant herein that a disputed question of title cannot be gone into in an application for grant of Letters of Administration.
The respondents herein are the wife and children of the testator.
Before advertising to the issue involved in this appeal, the factual matrix of the matter may be numbericed.
The appellant herein filed an application purported to be under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for grant of letters of administration with a company of the Will dated 20.2.1984 annexed purported to have been executed by one Anthony Rebello.
First Appeal No.
