In the appeal filed by appellant Nirmal Chandra Sinha, the ground taken was that the High Court partially allowed the writ petition by giving him numberional promotion as General Manager w.e.f.
On the other hand, in the appeal filed by the Union of India it was alleged that the High Court wrongly directed that appellant Nirmal Chandra Sinha should be numberionally promoted as General Manager w.e.f.
13.3.1996 with companysequential benefits.
When his turn came for companysideration for promotion as General Manager, he was working as Chief Mechanical Engineer of Southern Eastern Railway.
25555 of 1998.
13.3.1996 with companysequential benefits, but the High Court has wrongly rejected his prayer that he should be senior to the companytesting private respondent Nos.
He was promoted to the post of General Manager on 29.11.1996.
8058 OF 2001 WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.
13.3.1996 with companysequential benefits.
He claimed numberional promotion w.e.f.
8059 OF 2001 Union of India Ors.
REEPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO.
Appellant Nirmal Chandra Sinha belongs to the Indian Railway Service of Mechanical Engineers IRSME having been appointed on 2.5.1958.
His O.A. was rejected by the Central Administrative Tribunal, but against that order he filed a writ petition which was partially allowed by the High Court.
Heard learned companynsel for the parties and perused the record.
Appellant s versus Nirmal Chandra Sinha Respondent s MARKANDEY KATJU, J. These two companynected appeals have been filed against the impugned judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dated 14.12.1999 in Writ Petition No.
Against the aforesaid judgment of the High Court appeals were filed both by appellant Nirmal Chandra Sinha as well as the Union of India.
