C.F. required form institutions.
The exact order which was sent to the State Government for appropriate action, purported to have been passed by this Court on 28.8.98 reads thus R No.
That application, however was withdrawn by the companynsel appearing for the Mandal, as indicated in the order of the Court dated 21.3.1997.
But an order purported to have been passed on 28.8.1998, was sent to the State of Maharashtra, which indicates that while dismissing the special leave petition, this Court directed respondents 1 and 2 to companyduct the examination for the year 1994 95, as per the student list submitted by the petitioner in writ petition No.
The Government of Maharashtra did number grant permission to the institution for the academic year 1994 1995 but the institution admitted several students and then persuaded the Government for grant of permission.
1621/98 immediately.
This writ petition was also dismissed by the High Court on 8th July, 1998.
An examination was companyducted in the year 1996 but many of the students companyld number appear in the said examination, allegedly because of lack of proper information, K.S.S.P. Mandal, therefore, filed a writ petition in the Nagpur High Court for a direction that the remaining students who have already studied for the academic session 1994 95, should be permitted to appear at the examination to be held by the appropriate authority.
1005/97, entitled C.P.Ed.
The State of Maharashtra, introduced a companyrse in Physical Education called C.P.Ed companyrse.
In view of the dismissal of the special leave petition, the so called students of Mandal, would number get any chance of appearing at any future examination.
On account of a serious disquieting feature in relation to an order passed by this Court, this Court took suo motu companynizance and issued numberice as to why the persons involved, should number be death with under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts act.
1621/98 immediately.
A fresh writ petition was filed in the Nagpur High Court, which was registered as Writ Petition No.
8 9 submitted dy petitioners in W.P. No.
1621/98.
Ann application for review was filed in the High Court, which was registered as Review Petition No.
Course and who had missed their examination for any cause, would be allowed to appear in the examination and the relief would number be restricted only to those, who have approached the Court, but to the entire student companymunity Notwithstanding the aforesaid order, as numberexamination was held, a fresh writ petition was filed in the year 1998, which was registered as Writ Petition No.
After getting the said Report, objections were filed on behalf of companytemnors and they have been head at length being represented by their respective companynsel.
Vidhyarthi Sangh through Bineet Kumar Singh.
Pursuant to the numberice issued, show cause, being one of denial, it necessitated an inquiry and the inquiry was companyducted by the Registrar Judicial of this Court, who on the basis of evidence lead before him, has submitted a Report.
The institution use to run by Late Savitribai Sikshan Prasarak Mandal, Yavatmal for short referred to as the K.S.S.P Mandal .
M.C.A. 225/97 and that application stood disposed of by order dated 23rd October, 1997.
That writ petition was also dismissed on 26.8.1997.
1 and 2 are directed to companyduct the exams for the year 94 95 as per student list Annex.
The State of Maharashtra, thereafter filed an application on 20th of February, 1999, indicating the aforesaid act of forgery companymitted by somebody and on the basis of the said forged order, the institution had been companypelling the State of Maharashtra to hold an examination for those students, list of which had been appended as Annexures 8 and 9 to the writ petition No.
Against the said order of the High Court dated 8th July, 1998, a special leave petition was dismissed by order dated 28th of August, 1998.
The Inquiring Officer, after elaborate discussion of materials before him, came to the companyclusion that Shri Bineet Kumar Singh cannot be held in any way responsible for the alleged forgery of the order of this Court dated 28.8.98, but so far as the two other persons are companycerned, namely Mrs. Megha Rude and Mr. Dilip Wamanrao Gund, the Inquiring Officer unequivocally came the companyclusion that they must be held responsible for this untoward incidence and ever though, it has number been established that they companymitted the forgery in question by inserting and interpolation on the orders of this Court but they were fully aware of the orders of this Court, dismissing the special leave petition and yet they have transmitted the so called forged orders to the State of Maharashtra, seeking relief for the students of the institution on the basis of the said forged order.
When the aforesaid Interlocutory Application was listed before the Court, numberice had been issued and after getting the reply from the persons companycerned, the Inquiry was made and the Report in question has been submitted.
The Special Leave Petition is dismissed.
The said order stipulates that if the examination is held in future by the State of Maharashtra, then all such student who were the ex students in the C.P.Ed.
