On the strength of that claim, House No.18 was purchased in the said name.
434/78 pending in the Court of the Sub Judge, Delhi was disposed of by that Court, and an appeal, being Civil Appeal No.
From the Judgment and Order dated 1.10.1981 of the Delhi High Court in Criminal Misc.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
304 of 1980.
Main No.
32 of 1982.
Rakesh K. Khanna and R.P. Singh for the Respondent.
The following order of the Court is delivered Even though the dispute between the parties came to this Court from an initial order passed under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, this Court realising that the dispute was between close relatives in respect of their interests in certain properties which were also the subject matter in a Civil Suit No.
On the parties agreeing, this Court passed an order on September 5, 1986 recording the agreement to refer the dispute to arbitration and appointed Mr. Justice V.D. Misra, retired Chief Justice of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, as the Sole Arbitrator.
L. Chowdhary and Pradeep Misra for the Appellant.
It appears that thereafter one of the parties, namely, Jagdish Chander Bhatia, did number deposit the expenses with the Arbitrator and raised objection in regard to the arbitration proceedings on the plea that the property in dispute was proposed to be resumed by the Union of India.
211 of 1979 Jagdish Chander Bhatia v. Lachhman Das Bhatia preferred on April 23, 1979 against that decree, is pending in the Court of the District Judge, Delhi.
