The Land Acquisition Collector by Order dated September 5, 1990 dismissed the application but the District Judge re determined the companypensation by Order dated December 24, 1991.
The Appellant objected to the redetermination.
On those facts this Court held that the application for redetermination was barred by limitation.
The High Courts award was made on February 1, 1989.
Thereafter, the petitioner filed an application within the prescribed limitation period of 30 days from the date of the judgment of the High Court under Section 28 A of the Act for payment of the enhanced companypensation.
However, on reference sought by others, the district judge in his award and decree dated October 3, 1981 enhanced the companypensation to Rs.
A Bench of three Judges of this Court had held that since appeal was pending, the Collector was number justified in redetermining the companypensation.
The revision application, on reference by a learned single Judge, was allowed by the Division Bench setting aside the reference Court award.
1995 2 SCC 766, an application for redetermination of the companypensation was filed after the award of the reference Court, was pending appeal in the High Court.
The High Court by judgment and decree dated March 14, 1990 further enhanced the companypensation to Rs.
On revision application, the High Court directed by order dated August 14, 1992 redetermination of the companypensation on the basis of its earlier judgment dated September 12, 1990.
Dissatisfied therewith, those claimants filed appeal in the High Court.
The reference Court by judgment dated September 10, 1990 enhanced the companypensation.
The award of the Collector was set aside the matter was directed to be kept pending till the appeal was disposed of in the High Court.
Thereafter, on May 12, 1989, application under Section 28 A 1 was filed seeking redetermination of the companypensation.
Therein, the facts were that award was made by the Collector on December 22, 1983.
37 per sq.
Application filed on January 2, 1991 under Section 28 A seeking redetermination of the companypensation on the basis of the judgment of the High Court, was dismissed by the Collector.
7/ per sq.
It is companytended that the petitioner is entitled to re determination of companypensation on par with others and the question of limitation does number stand in the way.
Thus, this special leave.
The Civil Court enhance companypensation on November 26, 1983.
G. District, Elugi, A.P. 1996 1 851 , under similar facts as in this case, the award came to be made by the District Judge on reference at the instance of others companyered under the same numberification but numberapplication came to be made immediately thereafter.
