On 25.4.2006, the appellant made a companyplaint, inter alia alleging that his sons, namely, Devendra Pratap and Munendra Pratap produced petroleum products from polythene, and they demonstrated their invention at different levels by participating in various Science Competitions and also received recognition and reward from various organisations.
It is further stated, that, when the companyplainants sons asked the accused for return of the photos of the model, the accused persons abused and used names like CHAMRA etc.
Aggrieved by the order so passed, respondents number.
We grant special leave and dispose of this appeal.
The appellant filed companyplaint with regard to cheating before the Senior Police Officers and also before the other Government agencies, but that did number yield any result.
and also threatened to kill them.
The companyplainants sons companyceded to their request, but to their surprise, accused Sanjay Singh and Jayendra Singh got the invention published in their own name and affixed their own photographs, for taking direct or indirect benefits, by companymitting forgery.
The learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gohad, has taken companynizance and has issued summons against the accused persons.
In order to appreciate the stance of the companyplaint, it is necessary to understand the backdrop of the companyplaint.
It is further stated that on the request made by them under Right to Information Act, 2005, from the companycerned authorities they have been informed that the accused Sanjay Singh and Jayendra Singh did number make any model and did number participate in any companypetition and it was also revealed that, the accused persons have received prize money of Rs.10,000/ from the State Government on the basis of false information.
2 and 3 by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Gohad, District Bhind.
The trial arose out of a private companyplaint filed by the companyplainant against the accused persons for offences under Section 420, 467, 471, 323, 506B and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 2 5 of the Scheduled Caste Scheduled Tribes Prohibition of Atrocities Act herein after called the S.C.S.T. Act .
It is further alleged in the companyplaint, that, the newspaper reporters, Shyam Vajpai and Karan Singh of Dainik Swadesh and Nav Bharat, respectively, companyspired with the accused and published the news on the basis of forged documents, without inquiring whether the same are genuine or number.
By the judgment and the order impugned, High Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has quashed the companyplaint as also the summons issued to the accused persons Respondents Nos.
L. Dattu,J. This is a petition for special leave to appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution from the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Gwalior, in M.Cr.
On 5.12.2005, accused Sanjay Singh and Jayendra Singh requested the companyplainants sons to hand over the photos of the Model for production of Petrol from Polythene to them, so that they can get it published in newspapers.
C. No.2216 of 2006, dated 2.11.2006.
