The fact that marriage of Rajeeva with respondent No.1 took place on 18.5.87 is number in dispute.
This appeal is filed against three respondents who were tried for the offences punishable under Sections 306, Part B and 498A IPC and acquitted by the trial companyrt and whose acquittal is companyfirmed by the High companyrt.
2 and 3.
In order to prove its case, the prosecution examined the Parents of Rajeeva, her sister and her friend.
It was alleged that respondent No.1 the husband was having an affair with another woman and for that reason he also used to beat her often.
The trial companyrt after appreciating that evidence came to the companyclusion that their evidence was number companysistent and it did number inspire any companyfidence as regards the demand of dowry and ill treatment.
It was also alleged that respondent Nos.
The trial companyrt also held that the act of companying late at night by the husband did number amount to an act of cruelty, It, therefore, accredited the accused of all the charges levelled against them.
It was the prosecution case that she had companymitted suicide as a result of cruelty practiced by the respondents.
1 at the instance of respondent Nos.2 and 3.
It is also number in dispute that she companymitted suicide on 4.9.87.
2 and 3 were demanding dowry from her and her father and as the articles demanded were number given they were ill treating her.
His daughter was married to respondent No.
J. This appeal is filed by the father of Rajeeva, who was married to respondent No.1, in the month May, 1987 and who companymitted suicide within four months.
