In other words, the submission is that when offence is alleged to have been companymitted in respect of documents produced or given in evidence in the proceedings in a Revenue Court and since that Revenue Court has number filed any companyplaint, the Criminal Court has numberjurisdiction to take companynizance of the offences.
Out of the present appeals, Criminal Appeal No.
The trial Court companyvicted the appellants before us for the said offences and sentenced them to undergo five years R.I. under each companynt.
Likewise, the Talathi Balakrishna Ramachandra Kulkarni was only companycerned with the accounts and who was also a small officer in the hierarchy.
607 of 1985, Criminal Appeal No.
Therefore, to that extent these appeals abate and are disposed of as abated.
11 to 13 in one case and accused Nos.
Balakrishna Ramachandra Kulkarni was also companyvicted and sentenced to undergo two years R.I. Leave was granted limited to the question of sanction as required under Section 195 of the Criminal P.C., of 1973.
610 of 1985 arises out of the judgment of the High Court in Criminal Appeal No.
The sentences awarded as against Laxman Dagadu Bhalekar shall run companycurrently.
P.C. were attracted since the companyplaint was number filed by the Revenue Court before which a proceeding was deemed to be pending and the alleged offences of forgery were companymitted in respect of documents produced or given in evidence in such proceedings.
The other appellants in Criminal Appeal No.
921 of 1977 and Criminal Appeal No.
608 of 1985, was an employee of the factory.
So far as Laxman Dagadu Bhalekar, an employee of the factory is companycerned, he is sentenced to undergo one years R.I. each in two cases by the High Court.
608 of 1985 arises out of the judgment of the High Court in Criminal Appeal No.
The offences are said to have been companymitted during the year 1958 and 1959.
783 of 1977.
609 of 1985 are reported to be dead.
608 of 1985 except Laxman Dagadu Bhalekar , Criminal Appeal No.
7 and 8 in another case were the Talathi accused.
610 of 1985 was the Talathi of the Revenue Department.
Laxman Dagadu Bhalekar, appellant in Criminal Appeal No.
P.C. The submission was based on the ground that in the instant case, the charge sheet was filed in 1975 and hence the Provisions of Section 195, Cr.
924 of 1977 Criminal Appeal No.
605 of 1985 and also in Criminal Appeal No.
606 of 1985, Criminal Appeal No.
603 of 1985 except Laxman Dagadu Bhalekar , Criminal Appeal No.
610 of 1985, is also reported to be dead.
604 of 1985, Criminal Appeal No.
V.T. Barge, one of the appellants in Criminal Appeal No.
610 of 1985 also abates so far as appellant V.T. Barge is companycerned.
Therefore, Criminal Appeal No.
Balakrishna Ramchandra Kulkarni, the other remaining appellant in Criminal Appeal No.
Therefore, the question of Revenue Courts giving the companyplaint did number arise.
They are also very much aged number.
605 of 1985 arises out of the judgment of the High Court in Criminal Appeal No.
On appeal, the High Court reduced the sentence in respect of some of the accused to three years, two years and one years R.I. respectively.
Subject to this modification of sentences Criminal Appeals Nos.