The prosecution case is that the companyplainant, P.W.1 found a bundle of blankets and bed sheets lying unclaimed on a road, which he carried to his house.
The balance of Rs.
A1 got scent of it and recovered the bundle and got the companyplainant to the police station.
Thereafter, the green signal was given and the members of the raiding party arrived and the tainted numberes were recovered from the possession of accused 2.
This is the sum total of the prosecution case.
In response to the query made by A1, the companyplainant told him that he had brought the money.
Leave granted in the special leave petition.
Necessary formalities for organising a trap were made and at the appointed place the companyplainant as also P.W. 3 and P.W. 12 went to Hotel Dinesh.
On the later date, the companyplainant went to the Anti Corruption staff and laid a companyplaint to the afore effect.
2,000/ from the companyplainant for number taking any action against him.
Al demanded a bribe of Rs.
402 of 1994 is the offender and the appellant in Criminal Appeal arising out of S.L.P. Crl No.
After some snacks and tea were served, P.W. 1 gave the money to A2 as per the directions of A1.
500/ .
After haggling, the demand was reduced to Rs.
450/ was to be paid two days later.
Appeal No.
The appellant in Criminal Appeal No.
Al then told A2, the restaurant owner to accept money which the companyplainant, P.W. 1 would give him.
402 of 1994, which is already on Board.
Tagged with Crl.
They stand companyvicted under Sections 7, 13 1 d read with Section 13 2 and under Section 7 read with Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
They then went to Baba restaurant as suggested by accused 1 and sat on benches near the companynter.
50/ was paid on an occasion later on 16 12 1985 at another place in Bazargaon, as the companyplainant to begin with had numbermoney.
2859 of 1992 is the abetor.
