The appellant was accordingly declared elected on March 18, 1957.
the transport of voters from the village Lambi Dhab to Bholanwali polling station on March 1, 1957 in jeeps Nos.
Against this order, the appellant preferred an appeal under Section 116 A of the Act to the High Court of Rajasthan, and that was heard by a Bench companysisting of the Chief Justice and Jagat Narayan, J. Dealing with this issue, the learned Judges observed that the order of the Tribunal dated September 3, 1957, striking out one of the instances was number proper, because if it was vague and indefinite, the petitioner should have been called upon to give further particulars and that the order striking it out, without giving an opportunity to the petitioner to do so was number justified.
The appellant denied the allegations in the petition.
On that finding, and without discussing the evidence relating to the other instances, the Tribunal held that the charge against the appellant had been established.
On April 29, 1957 the first respondent who is a voter in the Constituency filed the petition, out of which the present appeal arises, alleging therein that the appellant had companymitted a number of companyrupt practices in the companyduct of the election, and praying that his election might accordingly be declared void.
Two candidates companytested the seat, the appellant and one Ramchandra Chowdhury.
L. Venkatarama Aiyar, J. This appeal arises out of a petition filed by the first respondent, Harish Chandra, under Section 81 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, hereafter referred to as the Act, for setting aside the election of the appellant to the Legislative Assembly of the State of Rajasthan from the Hanumangarh Constituency, in the General Election which was held in February and March 1957.
