Appeals from the judgment and order dated September 15, 1966 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Misc.
Then followed writ petitions to the High Court in August 1965 by private operators who were dissatisfied with the order of the authority companycerned.
The Corporation passed two resolutions in April and May 1964 by which it decided to take over certain routes under Chapter IV A of the Act to the exclusion of the existing private operators on those routes.
P. Sen, Advocate General for the State of Madhya Pradesh and I.N. Shroff, for the respondent No.
The schemes appeared in the Government Gazette of May 22, 1964 and objections thereto were filed by private operators affected thereby within the period prescribed.
The authority passed orders on June 8, 1965 modifying the schemes in certain particulars.
Finally, arguments were heard on May 20, 1965.
N. Phadke, Naunit Lal, Y. S. Dharmadhikari and M. N. Puranik, for the appellants in both the appeals .
4 and 5 in C.A. No.
351 and 311 of 1965 respectively.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeals Nos.
4 of 1939, hereinafter referred to as the Act .
The appeals are companynected and will be dealt with together.
Petitions Nos.
2201 of 1966 and respondents Nos.
The Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation hereinafter referred to as the Corporation , companystituted under the Road Transport Corporation Act, No.
V. Gupte, Solicitor General, K. A .
2201 and 2202 of 1966.
The hearing was to begin on September 4, 1964, but it was postponed a number of times.
On June 11, 1965, the modified schemes were published, but as there were mistakes in them, companyrected schemes as modified were finally published on June 18, 1965.
1 in both the appeals .
16 and 22 dated May 11, 1964, were published by the Corporation inviting objections within 30 days.
2202 of 1966.
5 and 6 in A. No.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Wanchoo, J. These are two appeals on certificates granted by the Madhya Pradesh High Court.
64 of 1950 , came into existence in May 1962 to operate as a State Transport Undertaking under s. 68 A of the Motor Vehicles Act, No.
Chitale, Rameshwar Nath and Mahinder Narain, for respondents Nos.
Thereafter the authority empowered to hear objections under s. 68 D of the Act gave numberices fixing a date for hearing.
Two schemes, namely, Nos.
