200 on the second companynt.
The High Court, on appeal, maintained their companyviction and sentence under Section 302/34 Indian Penal Code.
210 DB of 1989.
From the Judgment and Order dated 21.8.1991 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Criminal Appeal No.
The doctor certified that the patient remained companyscious during the period her statement was recorded.
This appeal by way of special leave is by the appellants against their companyviction and sentence.
The companyviction of the appellants is based on the dying declaration made by the deceased in the hospital before a Judicial.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
R. Lalit, B.S. Katial and S. Muralidhar for the Appellants.
They were sentenced for life and a fine of Rs.
Ms. Indu Malhotra for the Respondent.
The trial companyrt companyvicted both of them under Sections 302/34 and 498 A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The following order of the Court was delivered Sheema, second wife of appellant Surinder Kumar, sustained 70 per cent burn injuries in an occurrence which took place of May 16, 1987 and ultimately succumbed to those injuries on May 22, 1987.
Magistrate.
150 of 1992.
Surinder Kumar and his son Sanjiv from his first wife were tried for the murder of Sheema and also for subjecting her to cruelty.
