From the Judgment and Order dated the 19 8 1969 of the Delhi High Court in Civil Writ No.
Orders of the Central Government and the Settlement Commissioner were quashed and the order of the Assistant Settlement Commissioner was restored by the High Court.
In an inquiry under Section 9 of the Act the respondent was held to be a beneficiary under Jai Singhs will to the extent of 19 of the amount due to be paid to Jai Singh.
The respondent appealed to the Settlement Commissioner who agreed with the Regional Commissioner.
117 D of 1961.
Jai Singh died on 7th February, 1953.
The respondent Iqbal Singh, a displaced person from Rawalpindi, in West Pakistan, had a verified claim assessed at over Rs.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
26,06,413/ On 21st November, 1952, Jai Singh executed a will under which he gave various legatees, including the respondent, shares in the companypensation which was due to be paid to him.
Shyamla Pappu and M. N. Shroff for the Appellants.
1223 of 1972.
BEG, J. The Union of India and the Commissioners of the Rehabilitation Department of the Govt.
His uncle, Jai Singh, had also a verified claim assessed at Rs.
of India are the appellants before us after certification of this case, under Article 133 1 a of the Constitution, if involves a companysideration of the meaning of some rules framed under Section 40 of the Displaced Persons Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 44 of 1954 hereinafter referred to as the Act .
Goburdhan and R. Goburdhan for Respondent.
The judgment of the Court was delivered by.
