3551 52 3564 3567 4056 57/ 70 3967 668/70 3934/70 3960/70 and 496/71 respectively.
number 293 of 1971.
2552 2559/72 179 180/74 2/73 2684/ 72 1022/73.
from the judgment and order dated the 6th april 1972 of the madras high companyrt in w.p.
original jurisdiction writ petition number 363 of 1969.
from the judgment and order dated 19th august 1971 of the madras high companyrt in wp number 4469/70.
syed mohammed and k. m. k. nair for respondent in wp.
929 930 of 1973.
from the judgment and order dated 11th august 1971 of madras high companyrt in w.p.
from the judgment and order dated the 11th august 1971 of the madras high companyrt in w.p.
govind swaminadhan advocate general for the state of tamil nadu a. v. rangam k. venkataaswami and miss a. subhashini for respondent in all the appeals.
s. gopalakrishnan for the appellant in cas.
3826 3827/70.
petition under article 32 of the companystitution of india.
s. ramamurthy and d. n. gupta for the appellant in cas.
1010 1011/73 2552 2559/72 and 2/73.
number.
number.
number.
the appellants filed writ petitions before the high companyrt of madras challenging the validity of the tamil nadu additional sales tax act act number 14 of 1970 1970 hereinafter referred to as the act on the ground that the state legislature has numbercompetence to enact it that its provisions violated their fundamental rights under article 19 1 f 19 1 g and article 14 of the companystitution.
jayaram for the petitioners in wp.
and civil appeals number.
1010 1011 of 1973.
with civil appeals number.
s. ramamurthy and b. r. agarwala for the appellant in ca 1022/73.
and civil appeal number.
and civil appeal number 967 of 1971.
363/69 and for the appellants in cas.
d. sharma for the appellant in ca 2684/72.
363/69.
927/73 and 179 80/74.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by mathew j. the question raised in the civil appeals are sub stantially the same as those raised in the writ petition.
929 30/73.
