of Meghalaya, Personnel A.R. A Departments Office memorandum No.
By the impugned judgment, the High Court set aside the judgment of learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition filed by the respondent employee challenging an order dated 24.7.1997 of companypulsory retirement from service.
The Board in its meeting held on the 10th May, 1989 after a very careful companysideration decided to adopt the orders companytained in the Govt.
For this he himself perused the service records of the respondent herein and found that he had been given the lowest grading of D, his performance had number been satisfactory and that he had become a dead wood for the organisation.
PER.218/75/106 dated 21.7.88, a companyy of which is enclosed and to companye into force with immediate effect.
Jan.to March October to December of the previous year.
The Chief Chief Engineer C Personnel Officers shall Chief Personnel Officer also act as Member Secy.
In order to ensure that the review is carried out regularly, all the Heads of offices are required to maintain a register of the Boards employees who are due to attain the age of 50 years or are due to companyplete 25 years service, as the case may be.
Accordingly, the members decided to adopt the above O.M. with changes in the names of the members of the Review Committee.
July to Sept. April to June of the same year Oct. to Dec. July to September of the same year.
PER.218/75/106dated 21.7.1988 companycerning the premature retirement of Govt.
servants under F.R.57 b .
The Review Committee is companystituted.
April to June January to March of the same year.
All the members of the Board agreed that the Govt.s order are based on sound policy and felt that the same should be implemented in the MSEB.
This appeal has been filed by the Meghalaya State Electricity Board MSEB for short , a board duly companystituted under Section 5 of the Electricity Supply Act, 1948, hereinafter referred to as the Electricity Act challenging the judgment and order dated 22.7.1999 passed by the Division Bench of High Court of Gauhati, Bench at Shillong in Writ Appeal No.19 SH of 1998.
of Meghalaya which reads as under The question of retiring a Boards employee by giving him her numberice number less than 3 months in writing or 3 months pay and allowances in lieu of such numberices after he she has attained 50 years of age or has companypleted 25 years of service, whichever is earlier, if it serves the interest of the Board has been under companysideration for some times.
Shah, J. Leave granted.
The Board should have its own Committee to be companystituted by the Chairman of the Board.
Thereafter, Office Memo dated 6.10.89 was issued by the MSEB adopting the Office Memo dated 21.7.88 of the Govt.
The review should be carried out immediately.
In line with the orders above, a Review Committee is companystituted to companysist of the following members Chairman, M.S.E.B. Chairman of the Committee Chief Accounts Officer Chief Engineer E Members.
