Suffice it to say that according to the prosecution the respondents having entertained certain enmity, attacked one Lachhu with an axe, iron rod and stones, companysequent to which said Lachhu died.
Because of the said attack, it is stated that the deceased suffered 5 injuries out of which injury No.1 was an incised injury wound, in the left perietal region, injury No.2 was a wound on the occipital bone, injury No.3 was a depressed fracture on the left perietal bone while injury Nos.4 and 5 were bruises on the arm and hip.
The prosecution has examined nearly 24 witnesses.
Respondent in Crl.
It is against this judgment of the High Court that the State is in appeal before us.
A. No.1291 Babu attacked with an iron rod while their mother, respondent in Crl.
The doctor had opined that injury Nos.1 and 2 were grievous and on post mortem it was found that they were the cause of death.
A. No.1290 attacked the deceased with an axe.
A. No.1292, Dukhia attacked the deceased with a stone.
