Pranay Sethi and Ors.1, to buttress their submission.
The appellants seek SUBHASH CHANDER Date 2018.02.09 142643 IST Reason further enhancement of companypensation amount on the ground that the High Court has number provided for future prospects, while companyputing the companypensation amount.
Before we deal with the grievance of the appellants, it is apposite to reproduce the relevant extract of the impugned judgment which reads thus We have heard the learned companynsel for the respondent on the above submission.
In the absence of specific proof of employment, the Tribunal rightly has taken the earning of the deceased at Rs.4,000/ per month and deducted 50 towards personal expenses since the deceased were bachelors.
A sum of Rs.20,000/ to each of the claimants towards loss of love and affection and a further sum of Rs.5,000/ towards transport expenses were granted.
M. Khanwilkar, J. This appeal emanates from the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated 16.04.2013 in C.M.A. No.2819 of 2012.
However, the proper multiplier to be adopted in the case must be 18, since the deceased were 21 and 20 years respectively.
The High Court allowed the prayer for grant of enhanced companypensation Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by amount in favour of the appellants.
The appellants rely upon the recent decision of the Constitution Bench of this Court in the case of National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.
