The original plaintiff was an assignee of the jennii the land owner who granted Ex.
Appeal by special leave from the decree dated the March 29, 1967 of the Kerala High Court in Second Appeal Suit No.
B 6 for payment of land revenue for the properties by the appellants amounts in law to a stipulation as rent or michavaram to the land owner.
2 to 6 who assigned the same to plaintiff No.
2 as kanam kuzhikanam, paying the land revenue for the properties and enjoy them for interest on the kanam, and after the term of 12 years when the kanam of Rs.
It therefore falls for companysideration as to whether the provision in Ex.
Narayanan Nambyar and A. V. V. Nair, for the appellants.
B 6 were to be enjoyed by defendants No.
The appellants being the legal representatives of ,defendant No.
The suit is for redemption of the kanam on the properties in suit.
980 of 1967.
2000/whereof Rs.
2 had thus an undivided moiety in the properties in suit.
1 was offered the defendants shall receive and surrender the properties with basic documents by a registered release at their companyts.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The suit properties in Ex.
1400/ was to be paid to the prior mortgagees on taks I to 3 of item No.
B 6 to the 7 persons Narayani and others and their representatives and redeem the same and hold the said taks I to 3 of item No.
On the death of the original plaintiff, her interest devolved on plaintiffs No.
3 the rights under Ex.
I as kanam and tak 4 and item No.
1000/ is due to defendants No.
T. Harindranath and A. S. Nambyar, for respondents Nos.
I and 2 for interest on their advance after payment of the land tax to the State.
Subsequent to the institution of the suit, defendants No.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Ray, J. This is an appeal by special leave against the judg ment dated 29 March, 1967 of the, High Court of Kerala companyfirming the decree of the lower appellate Court declaring that the sum of Rs.
I and 2 but the properties as such are number divided.
1 to 4 and 6 1 and 6 2 .
B 6 have been divided equally between the defendants No.
of 1965.
