The appellant, while working as companystable under the charge of Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police, Central District, New Delhi, was charged with two fold grave misconduct i while he was in charge of the sub jail naib companyrt he facilitated one Puran, s o Rama, undertrial prisoner, to drink alcohol before being taken to the Court and ii he had abused the superior officer and created an ugly scene in their presence.
The inquiry officer in his report dated July 20, 1985 found that the second charge was partly proved and the first charge had number been proved.
Additional Deputy Commissioner, disagreeing with the companyclusions reached by the inquiry officer, issued a show cause numberice on August 16, 1985 as to why both the charges should number be taken to have been proved.
The Tribunal in its order dated September 17, 1990 dismissed the O.A. Thus this appeal by special leave.
The appellant submitted his explanation and thereon by order dated September 6, 1986, the Additional Deputy Commissioner dismissed him from service.
After unsuccessful appeal and revision, he approached the Central Administrative Tribunal in May, 1986.
The disciplinary authority, viz.,
Leave granted.
