Constructions like shops have companye up.
These sales have been deposed to by claimants witness No.
15 per sq.
In this companynection the High Court observed as follows Plot No.
The admitted position, as found by the High Court, seems to be that the land in dispute is situated in the city of Jalna which is a developing town and in the neighbourhood of the plot in dispute a grain market has already been built.
26 which is behind plot No.
1 Mohanlal Deep Chand who was then the President of the Municipality.
27 on the 70 feet road fetched the price at Rs.
The land was acquired sometime in the year 1954 and from the finding of the High Court it appears that the plots almost companytiguous to the land in question have great building potentiality.
15 per sq.
A respectable witness like Mohanlal Deep Chand, who was the President of the Municipality, had deposed that the average sale value of such land would be Rs.
Several other municipal plots have also been sold out.
The High Court pointed out that the evidence of Mohanlal Deep Chand has number been challenged on behalf of the State In these circumstances, therefore, this was a very reasonable and adequate basis for determining the companypensation of the land in dispute.
Murtaza Fazal Ali, J. This appeal by certificate is directed against a judgment of the Bombay High Court dated Dec. 3, 1968 arising out of Land Acquisition Proceedings taken under the erstwhile Hyderabad Land Acquisition Act.
