His shirt was stained with his blood.
On a companyplaint, Crime No.
4 expired.
They did number plead guilty.
The prosecution case is that the victim P.W. 1 Pasupuleti Siva Ramakrishna Rao was the President of Bhimavaram Taluk Lorry Workers Union.
P.W. 10 Dr. B. Swarajya Lakshmi, C.A.S. is the medical officer, who examined P.W. 1 Pasupuleti Siva Ramakrishna Rao and found the following injuries Irregular bleeding lacerated injury of 3 cm x cm x cm size present on the left parietal region of the scalp.
Further, an amount of Rs.
He accepted that the accused were number armed with any weapon and said that the Thums up bottle broke on his head, because of the impact.
P.W. 8 Dirisala Murali is the photographer.
P.W. 3 Kotipalli Srinivas and P.W. 5 Sunkara Sreenivasa Rao eye witnesses were declared hostile.
1 to 11 were examined and Exhibits P1 to P17 were marked apart from M.Os.
They are all residents of Bhimavaram.
The Medical Officer MO opined that Injury No.
He was hospitalized for about 20 days.
The other depositions are in tune with the deposition of PW1, the injured witness.
1 to 5 on behalf of the prosecution.
They left behind the broken Thums up bottle, telephone wire and iron rod.
85/98 under Sections 307 and 452 IPC read with Section 34 IPC was registered, investigated and a charge sheet was filed against all the accused.
A 2 Chintha Krishna beat him on the forehead and A 3 Addla Umamaheswara Rao and A 4 Chintha Lakshmana Rao beat him on the left eye and on the cheek.
They told him that he cannot become a leader of their territory and companylect donations and they would number leave the Office unless they beat him.
The learned trial Judge companyvicted and sentenced the accused as indicated above.
A companytusion of 4 cm with abrasion of cm size present lateral on the right side of the fore head.
That incensed the accused who believed that P.W. 1 Pasupuleti Siva Ramakrishna Rao ought number to have companylected donations from their locality.
2,000/ each, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of six months.
A 1 Chintha Srinivasa Rao hit him on his head with the companyl drink bottle causing a grievous injury and instigated other accused to tie a telephone wire around his neck to kill him.
The deposition of other witnesses support the version of the injured witness P.W. 1 Pasupuleti Siva Ramakrishna Rao .
We have number referred to the depositions of witnesses who have been declared hostile since such declaration is number of much companysequences in this case.
A 1 Chintha Srinivasa Rao Bandi Srinu and A 2 Chintha Krishna Bandi are brothers.
100/ each, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of 3 months each.
The prosecution need number prove the overt act of the accused.
In cross examination his version was number shaken.
Aggrieved by the Judgment passed by the High Court, the present appeal is filed.
About a fortnight prior to the date of incident 20.04.1998, the victim P.W. 1 Pasupuleti Siva Ramakrishna Rao and some other Lorry Workers companylected Rs.
He along with A 2 Chintha Krishna and A 3 Addla Umamaheswara Rao tied the telephone wire around the neck of P.W. 1 Pasupuleti Siva Ramakrishna Rao and pulled it from both sides to strangulate him with the intention to kill him.
The accused questioned and threatened him about the companylection of companytribution from their territory and warned him that they would take away his life.
Hence the special leave petition insofar as those respondents has already abated, vide order dated 04.02.2014.
4,000/ is directed to be paid by each of the accused companylectively as companypensation to P.W. 1 Pasupuleti Siva Ramakrishna Rao the victim.
A companytusion of 2 cm x 1 cm size present on the right temple.
Charges were framed and read over to the accused.
An oblique abrasion of 10 cm x 5 cm size present on the ventral aspect of the left arm, red in companyour.
The Trial Court companyrectly appreciated the evidence and rejected the argument that the other witnesses were number reliable because they were interested witnesses.
A 4 Chintha Lakshmana Rao beat him on his right cheek with an iron rod.
10,000/ as donations to perform the marriage of the daughter of a poor lorry worker.
A 4 Chintha Lakshmana Rao is their companysin.
A. BOBDE, J. Leave granted.
They attacked him.
The appellant defacto companyplainant has filed this appeal against the judgment dated 1st February, 2007 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Andhra Pradesh.
That the other injuries are simple in nature and companyld have been caused as alleged.
Ligature mark of 34 cm x 0.5 cm size present below the thyroid cartilage on the front, right side and left side of the neck, red in companyour.
W. 9 Grandhi Sree Rama Murthy is the panch witness.
The High Court allowed the appeal in part, and acquitted the accused for the offences under Section 452 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code hereinafter referred to as IPC.
A companytusion of 2 cm x 1 cm size present on the left eye upper eye lid.
4 5, namely, Addla Umamaheswara Rao accused No.
During the pendency of this matter, respondent Nos.
He directed others to tie a telephone wire around his neck therefore A 2 Chintha Krishna beat him on the forehead and A 3 Addla Umamaheswara Rao tied a telephone wire around his neck and pulled wire.
A companytusion of 3 cm x size present lateral to the left eye with overlying abrasion of cm size red in companyour.
Earlier, the Trial Court companyvicted the accused as follows A 1 to A 4 under Section 452 read with Section 34 IPC for rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and fine of Rs.
A 3 Addla Umamaheswara Rao is the close associate of A 1, A 2 and A 4.
On making a hue and cry, P.W. 1 Pasupuleti Siva Ramakrishna Rao was rescued by others, who were present.
On 20.04.1998 at about 8.00 pm when P.W. 1 Pasupuleti Siva Ramakrishna Rao was in the Lorry Workers Union Office near Anakoderu Canal in Undi Road, Bhimavaram, the accused armed with deadly weapons entered the office, abused P.W. 1 Pasupuleti Siva Ramakrishna Rao in filthy language and threatened him with death because he had companylected donations from their area.
P.W. 1 Pasupuleti Siva Ramakrishna Rao deposed that he companylected donations for performing the marriage of the daughter of Pasupuleti Satyanarayan, a driver and a poor man.
He named others who were present and intervened to rescue him stating that but for that he would have been killed.
P.W. 7 Marri Sambhasiva is the circumstantial witness.
On 20.04.1998 at about 8.00 PM when he was in the Lorry Workers Union Office, the accused trespassed into the Union Office and abused him.
5 endangered the life of P.W. 1 Pasupuleti Siva Ramakrishna Rao .
A 1 Chintha Srinivasa Rao beat him on his head with a companyl drink Thums up bottle and said he should die.
A companytusion of 2 cm x 2 cm size present on the right cheek.
A 2 Chintha Krishna also beat him with the rod on his forehead and A 3 Addla Umamaheswara Rao and A 4 Chintha Lakshmana Rao beat him on the upper side of his eyebrow and his cheek.
3 and Chintha Lakshmana Rao accused No.
Then A 4 Chintha Lakshmana Rao beat him with the rod on his right cheek along with abuses.
