Kolhapur.
The appellant was from the general category.
However, she was appointed, by an order dated 16th of July, 1991, as a part time Hindi teacher.
Nevertheless, by an order dated 16th of July, 1991, she was appointed a full time teacher in Hindi to the aforesaid post reserved for Scheduled Tribe D.T. and N.T. category candidates.
By the impugned order, a division bench of the High Court allowed the same and made the following directions With these observations, we allow this petition and direct respondent Nos.1 to 3 to reinstate the petitioner as a full time Hindi teacher in the respondent No.2 College.
Subsequent to the withdrawal of appeal, the respondent No.
On 27th of June, 1991, an advertisement in a Daily Newspaper was published by Jai Prakash Education Society, respondent No.2 herein, advertising three posts, including the post of a teacher in Hindi.
O R D E R Arising out of SLP No.13837 of 2006 TARUN CHATTERJEE, J. Leave granted.
This order of the School Tribunal was challenged by the respondent No.
1 by way of a writ petition, which was, however, withdrawn by her on 3rd of September, 2002.
A bare perusal of the advertisement would show that all the three posts advertised were reserved for candidates belonging to Scheduled Tribe D.T and N.T. categories.
The appointment companytinued, since then, every year on the same terms and companyditions.
1 challenged her number selection by filing a Writ Petition No.
The respondent No.1 was a scheduled caste candidate, which is number in dispute.
In this appeal, the appellant questions the companyrectness of the judgment and order dated 7th March, 2006 passed by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No.5652 of 2003 by which the High Court had allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent No.1 challenging the appointment of the appellant as a permanent teacher of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Mahavidyalaya, Peth Vadgaon, Dist.
The writ petitioner respondent No.1 herein, also applied for appointment to the said post of a teacher in Hindi on the basis of the advertisement, as indicated hereinabove.
The appellant was initially appointed as a Full Time teacher in Hindi by an order of appointment dated 10th of July, 1986 on a temporary basis for a period of one year.
The respondent No.
1, initially, challenged the appointment of the appellant and also her number selection as a full time teacher, by filing an appeal before the School Tribunal, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, which was dismissed, inter alia, on the ground of limitation and jurisdiction.
