CHARGEII That in your Travelling Allowance Bill for Rs 12,194.80 dated February 10, 1982 you made another claim for Rs 120 supported by two false separate money receipts dated February 9, 1982 for Rs 60 each obtained from one Shri Ram Prasad being the loading and unloading charges incurred for household goods at Phek and Amarpur respectively.
In the said bill you make a claim of Rs 9500.00 being the hiring charges incurred by you for a full truck and in support of your claim you submitted a false money receipt dated January 9, 1982 for Rs 9500.00 obtained from M s Balram Hariram, Church Road, Dimapur, whereas you neither engaged a full truck number spent Rs 9500.00 for the transport of household goods.
CHARGEIII That along with the Travelling Allowance Bill for Rs 12,194.80 dated February 10, 1982 you furnished a list of 19 packages of household items claimed to have been transported from Phek to Amarpur whereas only 8 packages of household goods were transported.
The charges read as follows CHARGE 1 That on February 10, 1982, you submitted a Travelling Allowance Bill for Rs 12,194.80 in companynection with your permanent transfer from Phek Branch to Amarpur Branch.
Thus you have infringed Rules 32 1 , 32 4 of the State Bank of India Supervising Staff Service Rules.
In other words, it ignored the words on the dates represented by the documents in the above finding.
By your above act you failed to discharge your duties with utmost integrity, honesty, devotion and diligence and have violated Rule 32 4 of the State Bank of India Supervising Staff Service Rules.
By your above act again you have failed to discharge your duties with utmost integrity, honesty, devotion and diligence and violated Rule 32 4 of the State Bank of India Supervising Staff Service Rules.
The said loan was number utilised for the companystruction of the building and as a result of which the account had become irregular.
This appeal is preferred by the State Bank of India against the decision of the Gauhati High Court allowing the writ petition filed by the respondent.
An inquiry was made into the companyrectness of the receipts and other documents produced by him in that companynection and into some other alleged irregularities companymitted by him and he was subjected to a disciplinary inquiry on five charges.
Thus you knowingly famished an inflated list of goods transported with an intention to derive undue pecuniary benefit and thereby infringed Rule 32 4 of the State Bank of India Supervising Staff Service Rules.
While he was working at Phek Branch in Nagaland, he was promoted to the rank of Branch Manager and was transferred to Amarpur Branch in the State of Tripura in January 1981.
He was promoted to Officer Grade 11 and then to Grade 1.
The appellant joined at Amarpur and claimed certain amount by way of reimbursement for the expenses incurred by him in shifting his belongings and other articles to Amarpur from Phek.
These deposits and various T.D. Rs.,
An appeal preferred by the respondent was dismissed by the Board whereupon the respondent approached the High Court by way of a writ petition.
The respondent was appointed as a cashier in the appellant bank in the year 1968.
The Disciplinary Authority perused the entire material and agreed with the findings of the Inquiry Officer on charges 1, 2, 3 and 5 but did number agree with the finding on charge He imposed the penalty of removal upon the respondent.
and other assets acquired as detailed in the Statement of Allegation enclosed herewith, indicate that you were having assets disproportionate to your known sources of income the fact which reflect adversely on your companyduct with is unbecoming of a bank official and thus you infringed Rule 32 4 of the State Bank of India Supervising Staff Service Rules.
CHARGE V That while you were holding temporary charge of the Phek Branch you disbursed a companystruction loan to Shri A song Snock in two instalments i.e. Rs 90,000.00 on May 7, 1981 i.e. as soon as you received the sanction from Regional Office and Rs 10,000.00 on May 10, 1981, without taking into account the progress of the companystruction of the building as instructed by Regional Office.
CHARGEIV That during the period of your posting at our Phek Branch your S.B. Account thereat showed frequent deposits by means of cash as well as transfer transactions.
An Inquiry Officer was appointed by the Disciplinary Authority the Chief General Manager who held, after due inquiry that all the five charges are proved.
