The learned Trial Judge as also the High Court based their entire judgments of companyviction and sentence on the basis of said letters and the companyduct of the appellant and other family members.
It has also number been disputed that the father of the appellant received burn injuries when he tried to save the lady and the child.
Whereas the deceased Sumitra died on the spot, her son and father in law died subsequently.
Three witnesses, namely, both the parents and the brother of the deceased were examined to prove the purported demand of dowry and harassment allegedly meted out to the deceased by the appellant.
The incident occurred on 11.3.1987 at about 11.00 a.m. Indisputably, the two year old child of the appellant was also injured in that incident.
B. SINHA, J. The appellant before us is the husband of the deceased Sumitra.
A child was born to them in 1985.
They were married on 7.2.1984.
