21 9 1960 of the Madras High Court in Appeal Suit No.
Defendants 3 and 4 are the alienees of certain properties of Gopalasami Chettiar from respondents 1 and 2.
The first defendant Ramathilakam Ammal is the daughter ,of Gopalasami Chettiar and the second defendant the adopted son of the.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
first defendant is the sisters grandson of her husband Sethu Chettiar.
Appellants are the sisters grandsons of one Gopalasami Chettiar.
The trial companyrt found against this plea of the appellants and the finding was companyfirmed by the High Court.
From the Judgment and Decree dt.
The two defendants are respondents 1 and 2 in this appeal.
2028 of 1968.
Thiagrattjan, K. Jayaram K. Ram Kunar for the appellants.
The suit was filed by the appellants for 1 a declaration that the adoption of the second respondent by the first respondent is number true and valid 2 declaring that in any event the second respondent as an adopted son companyld number take the estate of Gopalasami Chettiar either under the will of Gopalasami or by succession 3 a declaration that alienations made by respondents 1 and 2 on 16th December, 1956 in favour of respondents 3 and 4 are number binding on the reversions of Gopalasami Chettiar and will number enure beyond the life time of the first respondent.
Rajagopalan, Sunanda Bhandare Malini Poduval for the respondents.
80/60 .
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KAILASAM, J. This appeal is preferred by the plaintiffs against the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Madras on certificate.
