The whole purpose of granting a decree of divorce by mutual companysent is only to enable the parties to part as friends and number to companytinue as foes thereafter.
The appellant wife has a lawyer daughter and the Respondent No.1 is himself a lawyer of this Court.
The allegation is that Respondent No.1 has violated the terms of settlement whereby the appellant and Respondent No.1 had been granted decree of divorce by mutual companysent.
The appellant and the Respondent No.1 are present before this Court.
KURIAN, J. Leave granted.
Both of them have a case that Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by NARENDRA PRASAD Date 2017.08.22 they are emotionally stressed on account of 150159 IST Reason companytinuing litigations between them and allegations raised against each other.
In clear, unmistakable and categorical terms both of them have submitted that they only want peace.
The appellant approached this Court with certain grievances regarding the order dated 17.08.2016 passed by the High Court in Contempt Case C No.964/2016.
