But numberpayment was made.
Notice dated 27.4.1998 was duly served on the appellant.
It was averred that the application was clearly barred by time and therefore the said application ought to be dismissed at the outset.
Appellant filed an application in terms of Section 245 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in short the Cr.
2429 of 2006 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Arising out of SLP Crl.
Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing the application filed in terms of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in short the Cr.
P.C. Appellant had filed a petition for quashing the companyplaint filed by the respondent in terms of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 in short the Act In the companyplaint it was averred that a cheque was issued by the appellant on 31.3.1998 which was dishonoured by the bank when presented on 11.4.1998.
Since the accused appellant assured that the cheque will be honoured if it is presented again, the cheque was presented but was again dishonoured on 30.9.1998 for which numberice dated 13.10.1998 was again served on the appellant.
