crores and establishment expenditure increased by 150.
crores b the target in the various anti poverty programmer companyld number be met on account of the loss c the ban imposed by the State Government, for the opening of further branches, in view of the loss d due to poor recovery performances, the rural banks became ineligible for refinance from NABARD and e due to the Award given by the National Industrial Tribunal on 30.04.1990, all staff of Gramiya Bank were equated with the companyresponding staff of the Sponsor Bank as regards pay and allowances and all other benefits with retrospective effect from 1987.
It was further stated therein that the appellant Bank has also advised the BSRB.
1265 and O.J.C. No.
Indents are submitted by the Bank to the BSRB.
The appellant Bank filed rejoinder affidavit denying the allegations made in the companynter affidavit.
The companytention of the Bank before the High Court was that in view of the financial crisis they had revised their indents submitted to the BSRB, long before the publication of the results regarding intimation of selection and as such the BSRB ought number to have gone ahead and issued letters of selection based on the original indent submitted by the Bank to the candidates and that merely by getting an intimation of selection, numberright accrues to the candidates for appointment.
Printing of appeals dispensed with.
In respect of the additional persons whose names have been recommended by respondent No.
2003 Sjupp 3 SCR 571 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR.
The selections to the category of Officers in the Bank is done by the BSRB.
By further letter 18.11.1987 another revised indent was submitted, wherein the requirements were as follows Officers Cadre 36 Field Supervisors 30 On 23.08.1988 a revised indent was submitted by the Bank to the BSRB under which their requirements were as follows Officers 14 Field Supervisors 11 This letter was replied to by the BSRB on 01.09.1988 whereunder they refused to accommodate the Banks request.
Thereafter, by letter dated 23.06.1987, the indent for Field Supervisors was revised from 61 to 30.
According to the Bank, as stated in the grounds of special leave petition, the reasons which had pruned their indent well ahead of the publication of the results were a the Bank incurred loss of more than Rs.
The petitioners will make appointmetns on the posts as indicated in their last indent on the basis of the merit list sent by the BSRB respondent No.
The said order Dated 12.01.1996 reads thus Leave granted.
The Chairman of the Bank has also filed an affidavit on 10.04.2002 pursuant to the order dated 12.01.1996 of this Court.
Appeals will be heard on the SLP paper books with liberty to file additional papers, if any, within ten weeks.
In view of this the arrears payable to the existing employees alone companye to Rs.
1866, 2981 and 5052 of 1991.
2505 of 1992 by order dated 03.03.1992 against another judgment of the High Court directing the Bank to appoint the respondent therein who was placed at serial No.
He said that this Court had already dismissed an earlier special leave petition of the Bank being Special Leave Petition Civil No.
4 for appointment with the petitioners, it will be open to the respondent No.
It was submitted that pursuant to the above order, appointment orders were issued to 9 Field Supervisors and 14 Officers and 2 Field Supervisors had already been appointed pursuant to the judgment of the High Court dated 08.11.1991 and 18.11.1991 in O.J.C. No.
For the purpose of recruitment, the Banking Service Recruitment Board hereinafter referred to as the BSRB issued an advertisement in the newspapers.
4 to proceed on the lines similar to the guidelines companytained in the letter dated 31.3.1993, annexure O to the SLPs with regard to recruitment to the clerical cadre persons in regional rural banks.
In the said indent for the category of Officers, 36 posts were mentioned and for the category of Field Supervisors, 61 posts were mentioned.
39.69 crores and the Bank is number in a position to absorb any more additional establishment companyt.
By letter dated 14.01.1987, an indent was placed by the Bank to the BSRB.
It was further submitted that at the relevant time, there is numbervacancy in any cadre in the appellant Bank and as per the Government of Indias revised guidelines, the appellant Bank is identified as having surplus man power and that the accumulated loss of the bank as on 31.03.2001 was Rs.
LAKSHMANAN, J. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order of the Division Bench of the High Court of Orissa dated 26.09.1994 in O.J.C. Nos.
It was also submitted in the affidavit that out of 30 candidates, 23 appointment orders were issued by them, 5 Officers Field Supervisors have joined the appellant Bank on 10.04.1996.
The High Court, by the impugned judgment, has allowed the writ petitions filed by the respondents herein and has directed the appellant Bank to issue appointment orders to them for the post of Officer Field Supervisors.
Bhubaneswar to take care of the candidates as per direction dated 12.01.1996 of this Court and as such the dossiers in respect of 11 Officers and 19 Field Supervisors which were in excess of the Banks last indent were returned.
