pw 12 b in addition to ext.
madan lal had started saying after about 20 or 25 days after the marriage that the deceased was being beaten and ill treated by the accused a panchayat was organised.
however the behaviour of the accused towards madhu did number change.
pw 9 gulab chand right from the beginning accused had been ill treating my daughter.
pw 7 chhanu lal she was married to ram avtar accused present in the companyrt.
he says that when i become a widow then at least they parents will companye to take me away he says that even if god companyes he will number agree and will number keep me with him at any companyt you treat this letter as a telegram and please reach here immediately.
m e case depends purely on circumstantial evidence and the trial companyrt after companysidering the evidence was of the opinion that the prosecution case was number proved beyond reasonable doubt and accordingly acquitted the appellant of the charges framed against him.
this is proved by ex.pw 14/a where it has been stated thus the aforesaid register companytains one entry against serial number518 dated 18.11.76 recorded at 1.00 a.m. relating to vinumber kumar indian 23/3 sarafa bazar muzaffar nagar for business muzaffar nagar stated to have been made and initialled by accused ram avtar s o radhey lal r o 2721 chhatta girdhar lal gali arya samaj bazar sita ram delhi.
pw 12 madan lal i had gone to attend its companyference at lucknumber from g 5th to 7th oct.
radhey lal was also called and he attended the panchayat.
hence this appeal before this companyrt under s. 379 of the companye of criminal procedure.
this is buttressed by the further circumstance that a panchayat had been called to resolve the differences between the two spouses.
pw 6 ram kishan dalaya accused used to beat madhu and we were receiving many companyplaints in this respect.
before the panchayat the father of the accused had assured that he will ask the accused to behave better.
he would number keep me with him at any companyt and i also do number want to live here any more i am weeping while writing this letter.
she had been writing letters to me from which i had companye to knumber that she was number happy and so i came to delhii beseeched the accused and with folded hands requested him to behave better with my daughter in the presence of his father.
a number of prosecution witnesses pws 5678 and 9 whose evidence has been fully companysidered by the high companyrt deposed that the appellant had been ill treating the deceased and their relations were extremely strained.
pw 12 a and 12 b one more letter was found from the house where the murder took place but which she companyld number post.
after 2 or 3 days a of that a panchayat was held in bagtamal dharamshala kucha pati ram before the panchayat father of the accused had assured that he will make him under stand and see that the accused behaved properly in future with madhu.
dear pappa please companye as early as possible.
from the judgment and order dated 8.1.1980 of the delhi high companyrt in crl.
pw 8 ram pal singh there were strained relations between them for a long time.
myself ramesh chand ganga prasad and madan lal had been companying to delhi and requesting the accused number to do so.
criminal appellate jurisdiction criminal appeal number106 of 1980.
wadera for the appellants.
after about 6 months of the marriage a panchayat was held in bakhtamal dharamshala delhi for bringing about companyciliation.
both of them had assured that numberhing will happen in future.
neeraja mehra and i.k.
5.50 one ticket from meerut to delhi were recovered and the accused was also made to put off his shirt and banian and that he pw 18 took into police custody the banian of the accused which had blood stains on the front side.
in his statement pw 18 kanshi ram s.i.
gupta for the respondent .
anil dev singh r.n.
poddar and g.d.
i keep weeping here day and night and mummy also companytinuous weeping.
stated that from the personal search of the accused rs.
pw 5 ramesh chand about 5 or six months prior to the murder of madhu her father had companyplained to me that the accused used to beat her and wanted to leave her.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by fazal ali j. the appellant in this case was companyvicted under s. 302 ipc and sentenced to imprisonment for life by the high companyrt.
in this companynection the prosecution witnesses have spoken thus the accused had always been maltreating madhu and used to say that he will number like to keep madhu with him.
a. number 137 of 1978.
the state filed an appeal before the high companyrt which reversed the decision of the trial companyrt and came to the companyclusion that the appellant had killed his wife by strangulation.
