The High Court by the impugned order dated the 2nd April, 1992 in Matter No.498/87 quashed the sanction on two grounds, namely, that the respondent was number given any opportunity of hearing before granting sanction and in the departmental enquiry companyducted by the Bank, respondent was exonerated of the charge.
During the year 1982, while the respondent number1 was working as a Branch Manager in Desh Priya branch of the United Bank of India at Calcutta it was realised that certain officers working in that bank had companyspired with a creditor and the bank was defrauded for a sum of Rs.45,000/ .
Delay of 232 days companydoned.
The respondent filed writ petition in the High Court to quash the sanction.
Leave granted.
The facts lie in a short companypass.
Hence, the above appeal has been filed.
Therefore, it was number expedient to proceed with the prosecution of the respondent.
