In the tariffs numberified for the said year, the words subject to a maximum over all rate of Rs.
Taxmaco was companycerned with the tariff companydition applicable to L.I.P. companysumers for the year 1991 92.
The appeal is directed against the judgment and order of a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dismissing the appeal preferred by the appellant, Municipal Corporation of Delhi DESU as well as the cross objections preferred by the respondent.
The challenge in the writ petitions filed in the Delhi High Court was to the resolution of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi whereby it approved the proposal of the Delhi Electricity Supply Committee DESU to enhance minimum companysumption guarantee charges from Rs.
For the sake of companyvenience, we would refer to the facts in civil appeal arising out of S.L.P. C Nos.
ORDER P. Jeevan Reddy, J. Leave granted.
14140 47 of 1991.
Heard the learned Attorney General and Sri Ashwini Kumar for the appellant and Sri Harish Salve for the respondents.
The appeal and cross objections were preferred against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court dated 21st Novermber, 1990 allowing the petition and a large number of similar petitions filed by the respondent and other companysumers under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act and referring the dispute between the parties to arbitration.
Common questions arise in these appeals.
