The State Commission by order dated 30th January, 2012 allowed the applications in part and directed the appellants opposite parties to pay certain amount with interest in favour of the companyplainants.
Issue numberice on main appeal as well as on stay applications to the respondents, returnable on 22.11.2012.
The factual matrix of the case is as follows A number of companyplaints u s 17 1 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 hereinafter referred to as the, Act were filed by different persons before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Gujarat State, Ahmedabad hereinafter referred to as the, State Commission against the appellants opposite parties.
Against the aforesaid orders, the appellants preferred separate appeals u s 19 of the Act before the National Commission being First Appeal Nos.91 104 of 2012.
In all these appeals separate interlocutory applications for stay were filed by the appellants.
The National Commission by impugned companymon order dated 15th May, 2012 passed companyditional interim order which reads as under Heard.
Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. Leave granted.
These appeals are directed against companymon interim order dated 15th May, 2012 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi hereinafter referred to as the, National Commission in interlocutory applications for stay in First Appeals preferred by the appellants.
