875 4243 4632 1978 to 1980 2974 676 677 4483 1499 202215002023 3357 1865 1781 1684 3484 3479 2724 2080 3926 4113 4279 3527 and 4553 of 1990.
it is number disputed and it was found even by the tribunal that it was printed on the first page of every answer book.
369 393 of 1991.
825 826 and 394 397 of 1991.
do number write your name or register number or sign any where in the answer book or on any loose sheets such as precis sheetsmaps graph papers etc.
from the judgment and order dated 13.9.1990 of the karnataka administrative tribunal bangalore in application number.
power and authority of the companymission to hold examinations regulate its working and functioning take action against erring candidates guilty of misconduct are all provided for by the rules and instructions issued in exercise of power companyferred by the statutes.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number.
singh for the appearing parties.
vidyasagar m. veerappa kh.
das bahl ms.
numberin singh ms.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by m. sahai j. does the rule of natural justice has no exception ?
kiran suri p.p.
tripathi n.s.
vohra and l.r.
basis for the direction was failure of the commission to afford any opportunity to the candidates to explain their bonafide and innumberence therefore it was arbitrary and it entailed grave companysequences for those who were aspirants for entering into public service.
with civil appeal number.
n. narsimhamurthy e.c.
relevant clause 1 of the instructions to candidates is extracted below before companymencing your answers please write your register number and other particulars in the space provided above.
the claim of the candidates that they did number vest any right in the commission to take such action was negatived by the tribunal.
lalitha kaushik s.k.
