The order in this behalf reads thus The relief sought in the Notice of Motion cannot be granted unless the Union of India seeks clarification from the Supreme Court in respect of payment of interest on the amount deposited in companyrt and invested.
The respondents clarification application made pursuant to the above order, was dismissed by this Court on 10 5 1996.
The questions whether the processing activities companystituted manufacturing and regarding the assessable value of the processed fabric were the subject matter of a writ petition filed by the appellants in the High Court at Bombay.
As an interim order, pending the disposal of the appeal by special leave, this Court required the appellants to give a bank guarantee for 50 of the amount in dispute and to deposit the balance 50 in the High Court.
On 25 6 1993, Notice of Motion No.
The Praecipe was placed before a Division Bench, presumably because the Prothonotary had been ordered number to part with the monies until further orders.
On 4 11 1988, the appeal was dismissed by this Court.
The appellants applied to the Prothonotary and Senior Master of the High Court for release of the interest amount to it and on 20 7 1992, the Prothonotary so ordered.
What was shown on the Daily Board on that day, as we have seen, was the writ petition.
The amount deposited in the High Court pursuant to this interim order was invested in fixed deposit.
400 of 1992 in the High Court.
The question then was who was to get the amount of the interest that had accrued on the fixed deposits because there was numberorder in this behalf.
400 of 1992 was dismissed.
The Union of India to file proceedings for clarification before the Supreme Court within 8 weeks.
The appeal having been dismissed, the appellants approached this Court by way of a special leave petition.
The order of the Prothonotary was assailed by the respondents by taking out Notice of Motion No.
The application made in the Praecipe was argued before the Division Bench.
Pursuant thereto, the appellants wrote a Praecipe to the Prothonotary claiming the interest amount.
The appellant is engaged in the process of companyton and man made fabrics on jobwork.
No order as to companyts.
Leave granted.
Notice of Motion dismissed.
We shall deal with the facts of the appeal arising out of SLP C No.
17490 of 1997.
Prothonotary number to part with monies until further orders.
