Pursuant to or in furtherance of the said direction, an inspection was carried out at the instance of the Director.
The Appellant is, thus, before us.
The State of Tamil Nadu also issued a Government Order permitting companystructions of a shopping companyplex therein.
The said tank admittedly was lying in disuse.
A writ petition was filed by the Appellant before the High Court of Madras, questioning the said decision.
Relying on or on the basis of the said report, a Division Bench of the Madras High Court by reason of the impugned order dismissed the writ petition filed by the Appellant herein.
It was in fact an abandoned one.
By an order dated 06.12.2005, the High Court, having regard to the stand taken by the Respondent herein in their companynter affidavit, appointed the Director, Centre for Water Resources, Guindy, Chennai, as the Commissioner to inspect the tank land and submit a report in regard to the companydition thereof.
There exists a temple tank in the said village.
The Panchayat took a decision of companystructing a shopping companyplex for the purpose of user thereof for resettlement of those persons who were displaced due to expansion of a highway project.
The village is located on both sides of the main road companynecting Chennai City with Mahabalipuram on the Old Mahabalipuram Road.
A report by the Centre of Water Resources, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Chennai also was filed before the High Court.
The Appellant herein claims herself to be a member of the Okkiam Thoraipakkam Panchayat Union.
B. Sinha, J Leave granted.
