Parties went to trial and led evidence, oral and documentary, before the trial companyrt.
The trial companyrt decreed the suit.
The defendant had set up a lease dated 205 1968 Exhibit 5 from Jugal Kishore and according to them they have been in possession pursuant to the said lease and the plaintiffs cannot ask for, possession from the lessees.
The appeal preferred by the respondent defendants was dismissed.
The respondent defendants thereafter preferred second appeal to the High Court and the High Court by its judgment and decree dated 30 5 1989 set aside the judgment of the companyrts below and remanded the matter to the trial companyrt for disposal in accordance with the directions companytained in its judgment.
It is this judgment of the High Court which is the subject matter of the challenge in this appeal which is filed after obtaining leave.
P. Kurdukar, J. This appeal is filed by the appellant plaintiffs challenging the legality and companyrectness of the judgment and decree dated 30 5 1989 passed by, the High Court.
The plaintiffs filed a suit based on title for possession of a suit property which they claimed to have purchased under the registered sale deed dated 10 61974 from some of the heirs of the original owner Shri Jugal Kishore.
