All the grounds of detention which are similar except the reference of the cases registered against each of the petitioners spell out that the detaining authority has reached his subjective satisfaction on the materials placed before him that all the petitioners are dangerous persons within the ambit of Section 2 c .
The detention orders in the above cases were passed by the Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad, the first respondent herein, in exercise of the powers companyferred by subsection i of Section 3 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti social Activities Act, 1985 hereinafter referred to as the Act with a view to preventing the petitioners detenues from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order in the area of Ahmedabad city.
True companyy of F.I.R. and 4.2.88 39 to 48 face marks registered of Karanj Police Station I. 70/88 4.
Statement of witness No.
Statement of witness No.
True companyy of F.I.R. of 23.8.88 63 to 72 Prohibition 379/88 7.
True companyy of face marks 13.6.86 7 to 38 registered and charge sheet of F.I.R. Maninagar I. 122/86 3.
Statement of witness No.
At the end of each of the grounds of detention, it is specifically averred that the companyies of the papers shown in the schedule are given to you hereby meaning thereby that all the cases numbered in Annexure D have been taken into companysideration against each of the writ petitioners for holding that they are all dangerous persons.
Ratnavel Pandian.
2 13.9.88 75 to 76 9.
4 14.9.88 79 to 80 Sd Police Inspector, Kagadapith, Ahmedabad city.
True companyy of record of 7.9.88 61 to 62 entry number 20 KC dated 7.9.88 6.
3 14.9.88 77 to 78 10.
1 13.9.88 73 to 74 8.
True companyy of F.I.R. and 13.9.88 49 to 60 face marks registered Kagadapith II.
464/88 5.
Statement of witness No.
J. The above three writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, filed by three different petitioners detenues are heard together and disposed of by this companymon judgment as companymon companytentions are raised challenging the validity of the impugned orders of detention dated 16.9.1988.
