After hearing the parties companycerned, the High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that the appellant was number a workman by its judgment dated 5th September, 1983.
Aggrieved by the judgment of the High Court, the appellant has filed this appeal by special leave.
Thereupon, the appellant filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay, Panaji Bench, Goa for issue of a writ in the nature of mandamus requiring the Government to make a reference under section 10 1 c of the Act to a Labour Court to determine the validity of the termination of her services.
59 of 1983.
That petition was opposed by the respondents.
The said writ petition was registered as Special Leave Application No.
59 of 1983 Dr. Y.S. Chitale and V.N. Ganpule for the Appellant.
177 NL of 1984.
From the Judgment and order dated 5.9.1983 of the High Court of Bombay in Special Civil Application No.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The companyciliation proceedings failed and the Conciliation officer reported accordingly to the Government of Goa, Daman and Diu by his letter dated 2nd May, 1982.
After she failed in her several efforts in getting the order of termination cancelled she raised an industrial dispute before the Conciliation officer under the Act.
The appellant, Miss A. Sundarambal, was appointed as a teacher in a school companyducted by the Society of Franciscan Sisters of Mary at Caranzalem, Goa.
B. Pai, Parveen Kumar and Vivek Ghambir for the Respondents.
On receipt of the report the Government companysidered the question whether it companyld refer the matter for adjudication under section 10 1 c of the Act but on reaching the companyclusion that the appellant was number a workman as defined in the Act which alone would have companyverted a dispute into an industrial dispute as defined in section 2 k of the Act, it declined to make a reference.
Her services were terminated by the Management by a letter dated 25th April, 1975.
