1987 and companyvicted him accordingly.
The designated companyrt, however, found the accused appellant ManjeetSingh guilty under Section 302 IPC and under Secion 5 of Terrorist Activities and Disruptive Prevention Act.
Three accused namely appellant Manjeet Singh Kukku, Ajay Kumar and Georn Innis Jerry were booKed for trial before the designaaed companyrt.
18A. at P.S. Model Town.
The police after getting information arrested the appellant on 5 July.
PW 6 informed the police and it was recorded in DD Entry No.
PW 5 and PW I I torned hostile.
This was exhibited as PW 4A. It wa.s recorded that at 09.00 p.m PW 6 informed about the incident of the death of the deceased.
Hence the present appeal.
Both the persons started firing shots trom their revolver.
On the basis of this description police moved and apprehended the appellant at Jablapur.
Five cartridgss were recovered from the spot and those were fired from pistol.
Head Constable Naram Singh has proved this entry.
PHUKLAN, J. This appeal is dieted against the judgment dated 14.05.99 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Designated Court 11.
