The respondent filed an eviction petition before the Prescribed Authority, alleging that she had let out the shop when she and her family was living at Etah, that her family had subsequently shifted to Tundla and that she required the shop for her husband to carry on his business in motor parts.
After companysidering the evidence, the Prescribed Authority, by judgment dated 14.3.2002, allowed the eviction petition under section 21 1 a of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction Act, 1972 Act for short .
She further alleged that the appellant owned and possessed several shops near to the schedule shop, but had number vacated the shop belonging to her, and that he will number be put to any hardship if he is evicted as he companyld companyveniently shift and occupy his own shop.
The respondent is the landlord and appellant is the tenant in regard to the petition schedule shop shop for short situated at Tundla, District Firozabad.
O R D E R CIVIL APPEAL NO 1386 OF 2008 Arising out of SLP Civil No.
Heard learned companynsel.
1100 of 2007 G.BALAKRISHNAN, CJI Leave granted.
The appellant herein resisted the said petition.
