1 moved the Registrar of the Co operative Societies for referring the dispute between him and the appellant to arbitration.
1 filed his objections to that suit on August 5, 1963.
On April 24, 1959 he entered into an agreement called Lease and Licence agreement with the appellant under which he was permitted to occupy that flat at a monthly companypensation of Rs.
250/ .
The Registrars numberinee summoned the appellant to appear before him on July 28, 1963.
During the pendency of that suit Respondent No.
20 B on the 5th floor of the building by name Shalimar situate at Marine Drive, Bombay.
In 1962 a companyoperative society by name New Shalimar Co operative Housing Society Ltd. was formed.
The Assistant Registrar dismissed his appeal.
Thereafter Respondent No.
The Registrars numberinee overruled that objection.
On March 28, 1963 the appellant filed an application under Section 11 of the Bombay, Rent Act before the Small Causes Court, Bombay for fixing the standard rent of the flat occupied by him.
The Registrar entertained that application and appointed one of his subordinates as his numberinee.
Thereafter the appellant went up in appeal to the Assistant Registrar.
On July 28, 1963 the appellant appeared before him and companytended that he had numberjurisdiction to entertain the dispute.
Respondent No.
To be exact he became a member of that society on January 26, 1962.
1 is the owner of Flat No.
In his objections statement he pleaded inter alia 1 that there was numberrelationship of landlord and tenant between him and the appellant and 2 civil companyrts had numberjurisdiction to go into the dispute between the appellant and the respondent.
Aggrieved by that decision the appellant went up to the High Court of Maharashtra under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Respondent No.
On May 5, 1959, the appellant occupied the flat in pursuance of that agreement.
Hegde, J. This is an appeal by certificate.
1 became a member of that society.
