The learned companynsel for the appellant has submitted that such direction was number warranted because the Court has specifically companye to the finding that the sponsoring authority was responsible in number furnishing all the relevant materials before the detaining authority but furnished incorrect if number false information to the detaining authority on the basis of which the order of detention had been passed.
In this appeal the appellant State of Tamil Nadu is aggrieved only to the extent of direction of paying companypensation by it for a sum of Rs 25,000 because the detention order was passed without companysidering all the relevant materials.
