880 of 2001.
2 and Vinod Kumar under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2 by order dated 29th September, 2000.
She also filed a petition before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad.
The petition was disposed of with a direction to the Home Secretary to companysider the representation of the lady.
A case has been registered against Respondent No.
2 then moved an application for bail under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad.
2 and Vinod Kumar came to the field and opened fire with their guns at the said Hem Lata Pandey.
By order dated 31st August, 2001 this Court cancelled the bail, inter alia, on the ground that under Section 437 of the Criminal Procedure Code if a person has been previously companyvicted of an offence punishable with life imprisonment then that person shall number be released on bail unless there is numberreasonable ground for believing that the person has number companymitted the offence and that there are special reasons to do so.
one Shri Vinod Kumar, in a trial for murder of the wife of Vinod Kumar.
Against the order dated 29th September, 2000, the petitioner filed an SLP before this Court.
2 moved an application for bail.
The said Hem Lala Pandey, on companying to learn that Vinod Kumar had been granted bail, approached the Government for protection.
In spite of all this numberprotection was given to the said Hem Lata Pandey.
Respondent No.
2 viz.
Parties are being referred to in their capacity in Criminal Appeal No.
It is claimed that on 31st January, 2000 the informant was working along with his wife and two servants in his own field.
The said Hem Lata Pandey had appeared as an eye witness against the accused of Respondent No.
Respondent No.
Vinod Kumar was granted bail by the Appellate Court.
Briefly stated the facts are as follows The Petitioner is the informant and husband of one Shrimati Hem Lata Pandey.
As a result of this the said Hem Lata Pandey received gun shots wounds on her chest and died on the spot.
This was rejected by the Session Court on 13th July, 2000.
The High Court directed release of Respondent No.
Respondent No.
N. VARIAVA, J. By this Petition the applicant who was Respondent No.
880 of 2001 seeks review of judgment and order dated 31st August, 2001.
2 in Criminal Appeal No.
