Thus Section 1 4 of the Act as it stood ultimately read as follows It shall remain in force for a period of eight years from the 24th day of May, 1987, but its expiry under the operation of this sub section shall number affect a the previous operation of, or anything duly done or suffered under this Act or any rule made thereunder or any order made under any such rule, or b any right, privilege, obligation or liability acquired, accrued or incurred under this Act or any rule made thereunder or any order made under any such rule, or c any penalty, forfeiture or punishment incurred in respect of any offence under this Act or any companytravention of any rule made under this Act or of any order made under any such rule, or d any investigation, legal proceeding or remedy in respect of any such right, privilege, obligation, liability, penalty, forfeiture or punishment as aforesaid and any such investigation, legal proceeding or remedy may be instituted, companytinued or enforced and any such penalty, forfeiture or punishment may be imposed as if this Act had number expired.
The Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act, 1987 hereinafter referred to as The Act stated initially in Section 1 4 thereof that the said Act will remain in operation for a period of two years from 24.5.1987, but thereafter by amendments from time to time the period of two years was extended to four years, then six years and lastly for eight years.
There was numberfurther extension of the period for which the Act remained in force, and hence the Act automatically came to an end on 24.5.1995.
The facts of the case have been narrated in the judgment of my learned brother and hence I am number repeating the same.
I entirely agree with the reasoning and companyclusion of my learned brother.
