The case of the landlady is that the tenant did number pay the rent of the suit premises from I 7.85 in spite of service of numberice of demand Exhibit AW 1/6 dated 5.8.86 and companymitted three companysecutive defaults in payment of rent.
Delhi, on the basis of the evidence on record found that the tenant refused to receive numberice and there was default in payment of rent and, therefore, ordered eviction of the tenant from the suit premises on 1.7.1996.
41 of 1998 filed by the appellants tenants and companyfirming the order of eviction from the suit premises passed against him in landladys eviction case.
2001 Supp 1 SCR 442 The following Order of the Court was delivered Leave is granted.
This is tenants appeal, by Special Leave, against the judgment and order dated 2.8.1999 of the High Court of Judicature at New Delhi dismissing Second Appeal No.
He then carried the case in Second Appeal before the High Court which was also dismissed by the judgment and order under challenge in this appeal.
He denied service of demand numberice.
The tenants appeal presented to the Rent Control Tribunal, was dismissed.
The Rent Controller.
The tenant companytested the case.
This finding remained undisturbed by both the Tribunal as well as the High Court.
In this order the parties will be referred to as the tenant and the landlady.
