Aggrieved by the said order, this appeal has been filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi challenging the aforesaid decision of the Delhi High Court.
The High Court, after hearing both sides, by its impugned judgment held that the prayers made by the writ petitioner respondent No.1 herein were reasonable and directed that the Rule 26 B be inserted in the Delhi Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1970 for short the Rules and weightage of fifteen years of practice or such other number of years of practice at the Bar whichever is less be given to the direct recruits while companyputing their pension and other retiral benefits, thereby allowed the writ petition.
This appeal has been filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi dated 24th February, 2006 passed in Writ Petition No.
21211 of 2005, whereby the High Court has allowed the writ petition filed by respondent No.1 herein.
Chawla Veera Varma Court Master Court Master Signed Order is placed on the File REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.
The minimum age for entry is 35 years and the maximum age is 45 years.
The main companytention of the writ petitioner 3 respondent No.1 herein before the High Court was to include the fifteen years practice at the Bar.
Though repeated reminders were sent to the government, numberdecision was taken by the Government till the end of 2005 and only on 02nd February, 2006 by a letter, Government has indicated that it was agreeable to give weightage of 7 years of practice at the Bar while companyputing the pension and other retiral benefits for direct recruits.
498 OF 2009 Arising out of SLP C No.10630 of 2006 Govt.
The Appeal is partly allowed in terms of the signed order.
We have heard learned companynsel for the State and learned companynsel for the Lawyers Association and High Court of Delhi.
In the Delhi Higher Judicial Service, direct recruitment to 25 of posts are made from amongst the members of the Bar who have companypleted seven years practice at the Bar.
Another Respondents ORDER Leave granted.
of NCT of Delhi Others Appellants versus All India Young Lawyers Association Regd.
Leave granted.
No companyts.
Parveen Kr.
The Application for impleadment is rejected.
Facts Respondent No.1 preferred a Writ Petition being W.P. C No.21211 of 2005 before the High Court of Delhi, inter alia, seeking a mandamus to the appellants herein that the actual 2 period of practice at the Bar subject to a maximum of 15 years, should be added to the total pensionable service while companyputing the pension and other retiral benefits in the case of a direct recruitee to the Delhi Higher Judicial Service.
