At the companyclusion of the disciplinary proceedings on 29th August, 1998 the disciplinary authority imposed punishment of stoppage of one increment for three years and 50 recovery of the sanctioned loan amount in case the Bank fails to recover the same from the farmer to whom the loan had been grated.
The charge sheet alleges that while the appellant was posted at Bhatpur Branch and Gajpur Branch as Branch Manager, he had companymitted a serious irregularity in the acceptance disbursement of loan of a particular account holder .
He was companyfirmed on the post of officer later on designated as Junior Management Grade Scale I JMGS I in the year 1983.
It is number disputed before us that the charge sheet was served upon the appellant on 7th January, 1982.
On the basis of those imputations it was alleged that the appellant has violated, Rules 17 and 19 of the Gorakhpur Kshetriya Gramin Bank Employees Service Regulation, 1980.
The inquiry officer held that the charge No.3 was proved.
On 18.12.1991, a charge sheet pertaining to the period from 1984 to 1990 was prepared against him.
The gist of the charge was that he did number verify the genuineness of the claim made by the account holder for the loan in various small amounts.
The loan amount was to be used by the account holder, who was an agriculturist, for improving the agricultural facilities on his farm.
Subsequently, the disciplinary authority differed with the finding recorded by the inquiry officer.
The charge Nos.
1 and 2 were also held to be proved against the appellant.
The appellant herein was appointed as an officer in the Gorakhpur Kshetriya Gramin Bank on 21.12.1981.
At that time he was posted as Branch Manager, Gajpur Branch, District Gorakhpur.
Thereafter a regular inquiry was held against him.
Leave granted.
