That also failed.
Appeal by Special Leave from the judgment and order datcd the 1Oth April, 1969 of the Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench in spccial Civil Appln.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil APPeal No.
C. Agarwala, for respondent number 2.
The second respondent hereinafter the respondent was the cultivating tenant under the appellant landlords.
It was never in dispute in any of the earlier proceedings that the respondent was personally cultivating the land as a tenant.
2609 of 1969.
1039 of 1966.
The appellants then preferred a petition of revision before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Nagpur.
S. Barlingay, Sheil Sethi and Ganpat Rai, for the appellants.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by GOSWAMI, J. This petit ion by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Bombay High Court rejecting the appellant landlords application under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution with regard to a revenue matter under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Vidarbha Region Act, 1958 briefly the Act .
C. Bhandare and S. P. Nayar, for respondent No.
On a report of the patwari submitted on April 6, 1963, the Agricultural Lands Tribunal, Malkapur, took action under section 46 read with section 48 of the Act for fixing the price of the land in possession of the respondent.
The appellants companytested the proceeding without success and an appeal preferred before the Special Deputy Collector for Tenancy met with the same fate.
