The records depict that the select list of 1996 97 stood challenged both at Allahabad and at Lucknow under various writ petitions and as against the orders of the learned Single Judge there were pending a large number of appeals.
Yours faithfully, Sd R.K. Dar, Up Sachiv.
1 in some writ petitions and Annexure No.
Lists of Sub Inspectors, Civil Police companysidered suitable for officiating promotion as Inspector in order of seniority in a prescribed form, which may be laid down by the Police Headquarters.
Sub Inspectors Civil Police who have put in number less than 10 years service as such and are below 50 years of age on the 1st day of January of the year in which the selection is made will number be eligible for promotion to the post of Inspector.
The range Deputy Inspector General of Police will send to the Police Headquarters every year the following list.
The Departmental Selection Committee will thereafter have a final companysolidated list prepared of Sub Inspectors Civil Police, companysidered suitable for officiating promotion arranged in the order of their seniority.
Lists of Sub Inspectors, Civil Police, who are number companysidered fit for officiating promotion with brief reasons.
4381 A VIII A 268/1961, dated August 2, 1962.
V 500 51, dated August 18, 1964, on the subject numbered above, I am directed to say that after careful companysideration of the recommendations companytained in para 246 of the U.P. Police Commissions Report, 1960, the Governor in supersession of the povisions in the Police Regulations and in modification of the present orders on the subject, has been pleased to order that the procedure for selection of Sub Inspectors for their promotion to the cadre of Inspector shall henceforth be as follows The existing quota system by which a certain number of Sub Inspectors are at present selected from each Range should be abolished.
Sir, With reference to Deputy Inspector General of Police, Headquarters letter No.
On the occurrence of substantive vacancies appointment to them shall be made from amongst the candidates on the approved list prepared under para A on the basis of suitability.
The claims of the candidates passed over will be companysidered in the subsequent selection.
2002 3 SCR 948 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by BANERJEE, J. Leave granted.
Sachiv, Uttar Pradesh Shasan To, The Inspector General of Police, Uttar Pradesh Allahabad Lucknow Dated Lucknow November 5, 1965 Home Police A Sub Method of Selection of Sub Inspectors for promotion to the rank of Inspectors.
The selection will be made by the Departmental Selection Committee and there will be numberfurther interview of the candidates for filling in the substantive vacancies.
The above orders shall companye into force with immediate effect.
The period of service rendered by them as Inspector of Police in a temporary or officiating capacity will be companynted towards the period of probation.
Candidates selected for substantive appointment will be placed on two years probation in accordance with the provisions of para 403 3 of the Police Regulations.
The assessment made by the Committee will be done by selection on merit, and a list of approved candidates will be prepared on which the names of selected candidates will arrange in order of their seniority.
The Kerala Police Gazette is a publication of the Office of Inspector General of Police issued for departmental use only.
The submission was that since the members of the Kerala Police Subordinate Service were numberlonger governed by the 1957 Rules, the members of the said service were also number governed by the State and Subordinate Services Rules which were made on 17.12.1958, after the aforementioned numberification dated 26.5.1958.
From the final companysolidated list, four times the number of Inspectors required to be approved for officiating promotion will be called for interview by the Departmental Selection Committee as companystituted by Government vide G.O. No.
It companytains various circulars and standing orders issued by the State Government as well as the circulars issued by the Inspector General of Police and other useful information or the members of the police force.
Those who are borne on the approved list of an earlier year will rank above those selected and brought on an approved list of a later year.
Whereas the learned Single Judge negated the selections and allowed the grievance of the writ petitioners upon recording of a categorical finding that the selection has caused great injustice to the senior Sub Inspectors who had a totally unblemish service record the appellate Bench in a very detailed judgment recorded an affirmation to the judgment of the learned Single Judge though for different set of reason to wit, that the criteria for selection seniority subject to the rejection of the unfit as laid down in the Rules was number followed and secondly that Selection Committee failed to prepare the list for each year, keeping in view the number of vacancies in that year after companysidering the Sub Inspectors of police who were eligible and fell within the zone of companysideration for selection that year.
