The District Forum directed the appellant to re calculate the entire amount with simple interest 15 p.a.
The grievance was that the companyplainant purchased a shop in an auction in 1993 and had deposited a sum of Rs.82,000/ .
He had further deposited a sum of Rs.2,07,000/ .
rate of interest against the companypound rate of interest as demanded by the appellant authority.
Since further payment was number forthcoming there was numberarea development and the appellant authority resumed the plot.
The companyplaint was filed by the companyplainant for rectifying statement of accounts by working out the amount payable by charging 10 p.a.
The companyplaint was filed under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 in short the Act .
Challenge in the revision petition before the National Commission was to the order passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Panchkula in short District Forum as companyfirmed by the order passed by the State Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, in short the State Commission .
An undertaking was filed before the appellate authority by way of an undertaking that he was ready to pay the balance amount as per HUDA policy.
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Against this, appeal was filed before the Administrator of the appellant authority who allowed the appeal and fixed schedule of payments.
Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in short National Commission .
By the impugned order the Commission dismissed the petition.
