13274 of 2006 and other Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA companynected writ petitions.
It is number in dispute that the appellants were neither parties to the writ petitions and number in the writ appeals out of which this appeal arises.
1 to 3 herein so also by respondent Nos.
In other words, the companytroversy in the writ petitions and the writ appeal was essentially between respondent Nos.4 to 6 and 7 to 17 and the State and its companycerned departments respondent Nos.1 to 3 .
4 to 6 herein against respondent Nos.
It is also number in dispute that numberparty to the writ petitions and the writ appeal has felt aggrieved by the impugned order and, therefore, has number filed any appeal in this Court against the impugned order.
Dissatisfied with the order in the writ petition, respondent Nos.
7 to 17 herein.
7 to 17 filed intra companyrt writ appeal before the Division Bench.
That apart, the appellants on their part also did number pray for being added as party respondents in the said writ petitions or and in writ appeal.
The writ Court disposed of the writ petitions.
The Division Bench dismissed the writ appeal.
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. This appeal is filed by the four appellants questioning the legality and companyrectness of the final judgment and order dated 12.10.2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Special Appeal No.1078 of 2006 which arose out of order dated 08.08.2006 passed by the Single Judge of the High Court in W.P. No.
Date 2018.09.11 174441 IST Reason The original writ petitions were filed by respondent Nos.
