Admittedly the respondents daughter passed her M.B.B.S. examination and was studying the M.S. companyrse when the present application for eviction was filed before the Rent Controller, Hyderabad.
200/ per month when the petition was filed.
The Rent Controller has stated the manner in which the rent of the premises was raised from time to time from Rs.
30/ per month to Rs.
The tenants revision application under the rent Act was dismissed by the High Court by a very short order.
The landlord was further asking the appellant to agree to pay the double the said amount which he refused, and this led to the filing of the case.
The Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad, after examining the evidence led by the parties, rejected the landlords case and dismissed the eviction petition.
The appellant denied the alleged necessity of the landlord and inter alia pleaded that the sole purpose of the proceeding was to extract higher rent.
The landlord filed an appeal against the judgment of the Rent Controller which was allowed by the Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad.
Her husband also is a doctor and is running a clinic at a distance of 6 miles.
The companyrt also pointed out that the landlord was in possession of several other premises and was in the habit of starting eviction proceedings to pressurise the tenants to agree to raise the rent and if they agreed the eviction cases were withdrawn.
Lalit Mohan Sharma, J. This appeal by special leave at the instance of the tenant of the premises in question is directed against the decree for his eviction on the ground that the respondent landlord requires the premises for opening a clinic by his doctor daughter.
The respondents daughter is assisting her husband in his clinic but it is claimed by the respondent landlord that she is desirous of starting a separate clinic and for that purpose the premises in question, let out to the appellant, is suitable.
