PRASAD NEW DELHI JANUARY 25, 2011.
This appeal by way of special leave arises out of the following facts 1.1 Banta Singh, deceased the grand father of the appellant herein, was the owner of about 14 acres of land which was being cultivated by his three sons including Pyara Singh, accused.
The incident was witnessed by Gurdev Kaur, wife of the deceased, Charan Kaur her daughter in law and Rani the niece of the companyplainant and several other persons as well.
He also had two tube wells one of which had been entered in the revenue record as belonging to Pyara Singh and Banta Singh felt that this change had been made as a result of a fraud played by Pyara Singh.
1.2 On the 26th of September, 1982, Mukhtyar Singh, aforesaid had gone to Jaspur for his personal work Crl.
This infuriated Pyara Singh further on which he and the appellant herein assaulted the deceased with a ballam and pharsi.
1.3 The trial companyrt on a companysideration of the evidence companyvicted Gurdeep Singh, Pyara Singh and Chhinder Kaur for the aforesaid offence on the Crl.
A. No.
This had annoyed him and he executed a Will of his entire property in the names of his two other sons Kartar Singh and Mukhtyar Singh.
On hearing the alarm Mukhtyar Singh also arrived at the spot.
Pyara Singh refused to do so on which the deceased threatened that the sale deed of his land would be immediately executed in favour of Kartar Singh and Mukhtyar Singh, the other two sons.
J HARJIT SINGH BEDI CHANDRAMAULI KR.
At about 700a.m.
The deceased fell on the ground, whereafter Chhinnder Kaur wife of Pyara Singh, caused him several injuries which resulted in his immediate death.
It is the companyceded position that the Special Leave Petition filed by Pyara Singh has been dismissed by this Court whereas numberice had been issued in the case of the appellant, in the light of the fact that he claimed to be 11 to 13 years of age as on the date of the incident and being a juvenile companyld number have been tried before a Criminal Court.
The appeal of Gurdeep Singh and Pyara Singh was dismissed by the High Court.
Mukhtyar Singh then made his way to the police station and lodged a First Information Report for an offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
A. No.
642 of 2005 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
The assailants, however, ran away towards the jungle.
This annoyed Pyara Singh yet further.
the deceased went to the tube well of Pyara Singh and asked him to provide water from his tube well in order to irrigate the paddy crop.
A. No.
642 of 2005 statements made by Gurdev Kaur and the others.
642 OF 2005 GURDEEP SINGH APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF UTTARANCHAL RESPONDENT O R D E R This appeal by way of special leave arises out of the following facts 1.1 Banta Singh, deceased the grand father of the appellant herein, was the owner of about 14 acres of land which was being cultivated by his three sons including Pyara Singh, accused.
642 of 2005 whereas the companyplainant went into the jungle to relieve himself leaving the deceased in the house.
An appeal was thereafter taken to the High Court and during its pendency, Chhinder Kaur passed away.
