9 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 from the office of the Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Estate, Haryana for hearing with regard to land acquisition pertaining to Village Sihi Hadbast number 108, Tehsil Manesar, District Gurgaon Rewari.
Land Acquisition Collector Nemita Commercial Private Limited was heard in the same office of the Land Acquisition Collector.
Thereafter, an affidavit was filed giving answers to said questions as under That the petitioner submits the following response to the issues in terms of the aforesaid order dated 06.02.2019 Whether any application for reference was preferred after the disposal of application under Section 28A of the Act?
6 dated 05.08.2014.
Around this time, cross appeals preferred by the landholders as well as the State against the decision of the Reference Court were pending in the High Court.
In support, the affidavit of the aforesaid representative of the Petitioner, Shri Satyawan is also filed along with the present affidavit.
Said application was decided on 25.10.2000 that is almost eight years after the application was preferred.
It was during this hearing on 03.08.2016 that the representative of the Petitioner, Shri Satyawan, came to know about the decision of the Honble High Court dated 24.05.2016 in Moti Sagar Ors.
23688 of 2016 OM challenging the order dated 06.03.2014 whereby the application under section 28A filed by the petitioner was disposed off.
The Petitioner had received a numberice dated 04.07.2016 in respect of one of its subsidiary companypany namely Nemita Commercial Private Limited, under sec.
This second application came to be dismissed by the High Court.
4 dated 07.08.2013 and numberification under sec.
Was the petitioner aware while the application under Section 28A of the Act was pending companysideration that the appeals were preferred and were pending in the appellate companyrt?
English translation and true companyy of the numberice dated 04.07.2016 are being annexed herewith and marked as ANNEXURE B pages 11 to 13 .
Response The petitioner never came to know of the pendency of the appeals before the High Court till disposal of its application under Section 28A on 06.03.2014.
These appeals were disposed of by the High Court on 23.03.2009 granting companypensation at an enhanced rate of Rs.18000 per acre.
It is pertinent to numbere that the petitioners application under section 28A and the hearing held on 03.08.2016 pertaining to SLP C No.618 of 2018 M S. Model Economic Township Ltd. Vs.
When did the petitioner companye to know for the first time about the pendency or disposal of the appeals by the High Court?
Later, Civil Appeal Nos.
This hearing was scheduled to be held on 03.08.2016.
After hearing learned companynsel for both sides, on 06.02.2019 this Court posed certain questions on which response from the petitioner was sought.
The petitioner came to know about the disposal of the said appeals for the first time on 03.08.2016.
v. State of Haryana and Anr.
This land acquisition arose out of a numberification under sec.
RFA number 1580 of 2012 filed by the other landowners.
The questions were posed as those factual details were number available on record.
Thereafter, the Petitioner companytacted Shri Shailendra Jain, Sr.
When was the writ petition filed in the High Court?
who had also argued on behalf of the writ petitioners in Moti Sagar and engaged him to argue the writ petition bearing C.W.P. No.
