Saini caste wasin Block B that is why the advertisement7 of 1995 divided the ten seats for backward classesinto six seatsfor backward class candidates in Block Aand 4 seats for backward class candidates in Block B Afterthese instructions, therefore, theappellant formed a partof Block B amongst backward classes.
Both theadvertisementswere clubbed together in selectionof candidates Advertisement No.7 of 1995 stated that the post which were advertised under Advertisement No.7 of 1995 were in additionto the posts advertised under Advertisement 1 of1995 need number apply again.
Thus application under both these advertisementwere clubbed together, candidates were interviewed and selected taking into account theapplicationsunder both these advertisements.
He hasalso urged that prior to his being selected and appointed he washolding the post oflecturer in political science in Rajdevi Multi PurposeCollege for WomenBehrian.
The appellant has challengedthis finding.
Pursuant to his appointment, the appellant jointed his post on 18.4.1996.However, he received a registered letter dated 11.6.1996 statingthat there had beenan error in issuinghim an appointment letter and theappointment letter was being withdrawn.
under Advertisement No.1 of 1995 15 posts of lecturers in political science were advertised of which one was reserved for backward classes.
After the Advertisement 1 of 1995 andbefore Advertisement 7 of 1995, instructionwere issued bythe Chief Secretary, Government of Haryana to all heads of departments and other authorities stating that thereservation for backward classeswas enhancedfrom 10 to 27 andthat amongst backward classes, it was decided tocreatetwo blocks, Block A and 11 would be reserved for backward classes in Block B and 16 of seats would be reserved for backward classesin Block A and 11 would be reserved for backward classesin Block B There was also a reservation of 10 for ex servicemen and 3 for physicallyhandicapped.
One of the posts so advertised was that of lectures in political science.
He has alsostatedthat he is a physically handicapped personand a a sympathetic view should be taken ofhis situation.
Now he is deprived of both these posts.
Inthe order of merit, he was at serial No.
Out of these 10, six were reserved for backward classes inthe Acategory and four were reserved for backwardclassesin the B category.
The appellant applied for the post oflecturer in political science.
According to the respondent there wasan error in granting an appointmentto the appellant because theone post of backward class candidatewhich was advertised by Advertisement 1 of 1995 was erroneously companysidered bythem as forming a part of Block B while it should have formed a partof Block A Hence the appointment given to the appellant was withdrawn.
Castes forming part of BlockA andcastes formingpart of Block B were enumerated.
Since applicants of all these 63 posts were companysidered for selection after the companying into force ofinstructions dated 20.7.1995, we will have to take into account the roster prepared under these instructions for reservation of posts forBlock A and BlockB backward class candidates.
Under Advertisement No.7 of 1995, inter alia, 48 posts of lectures in political sciencewere advertisedout of which 10 were reserved for backward classes.
JU D G ME N T MRS.
5 in Block Bof selected backward classcandidates.
As per the roster which forms a part of instructions issued on20th of July,1995 the following roster points are preserved for candidates belonging to Block B. Block B 9 18 27 ESM 63 46 54 ESM 63 72 81 ESM 89 PH 98 Sixty three postsof lecturers in political science were being filled fifteen under Advertisement 1 of 1995 and forty eighty under advertisement 7 of 1995.
Their previous application would be companysidered.
Hewas gives an appointment letter dated 4.4.196.
He resigned from his post in order to accept the appointment offered to him on his selection pursuant to the Advertisements 1 and 7 of 1995.
The appellant was number of the candidates selected in the backward class category.
Under Advertisement 1 of 1995.
Two advertisement bearing No.1 of 1995and No.7 of 1995 were issued by the Subordinate Service Selection Board, haryanafor recruitment of candidates to various posts.
SUJATA V. MANOHAR,J. The appellant is a Sainideclared us of the other backward classin the State ofHaryanaa numberification dated 5.2.1991.
This numberification inter, providesthat persons belonging to the Saini caste and residing in the state of Haryanawill be companysidered asforming a part otherback classesin the state ofHaryana.
