36 p.m. to Ravindra Kishore for 3 years only in case he companytinued his medicine studies, Rs.
134 1 c of the Constitution because there is companyflict of opinion on the question of the interpretation to be given to the word child in s. 489, Cr.
45 p.m. to Shashi Prabha as her maintenance allowance and education expenses and Rs.
35 p.m. to Chandra Kishore for four months only, Rs.
P.C. stands impliedly repealed by s. 4 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 78 of 1956 hereinafter referred to as the Maintenance Act insofar as it is applicable to Hindus secondly, that the word child in s. 488 means a minor and thirdly, that the maintenance fixed for Chandra Kishore and Ravindra Kishore was based on wrong principles and was excessive inasmuch as expenses for education have been taken into companysideration.
The first applicant, Chandra Kishore, was born on January 23, 1942, the second, Ravindra Kishore, was born on September 23, 1943, the third Shashi Prabha, was born on February 23, 1947, and the fourth, Rakesh Kumar, was, born on September 21, 1948.
P.C. filed on September 4, 1963, in the Court of Magistrate, 1st Class, Delhi, by four children of the respondent, Nanak Chand.
45 p.m. to Rakesh Kumar as his maintenance allowance and education expenses, from March 26, 1965.
The High Court granted the certificate under art.
Appeal from the judgment and order dated May 2, 1968 of the Delhi High Court in Criminal Revision Nos.
50 until Shashi Prabha was able to earn or was married, whichever was earlier, and until Rakesh Kumar was able to maintain himself.
and M.B.B.S., respectively.
Both the applicants and the respondent, Nanak Chand, filed revisions against the order of the Magistrate, to the Additional Sessions Judge, who dismissed the revision petition filed by the respondent, Nanak Chand, and accepted the revision petition of the applicants.
6 of 1969.
339 D of 1965 and 185 D of 1968.
100 p.m. each as maintenance allowance until they finished their companyrses of Com.
But taking into companysideration the income of the respondent and the status of the family, the Additional Sessions Judge proposed to allow Chandra Kishore and Ravindra Kishore Rs.
The High Court accepted the reference made by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, and dismissed the criminal revision filed by the respondent.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
He further proposed to allow to Rakesh Kumar and Shashi Prabha each a monthly maintenance allowance of Rs.
Sardar Bahadur Saharya and Yougindra Khushalani, for the appellant.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Sikri, J. This appeal by certificate of fitness granted by the High Court of Delhi arises out of an application under S. 488, Cr.
C. Mazumdar and Yogeshwar Dayal, for the respondents.
The first two applicants were thus majors at the time of the appli cation, the third though a minor at the time of the application was a major on the date of the order passed by the Magistrate, i.e., on March 26, 1965.
The learned Magistrate allowed the application and ordered the, respondent, Nanak Chand, to pay Rs.
