Later he made a representation to the Zonal Manager requesting to appoint him as a regular employee in the bank by quoting the circular number XVIII/90/20 dated 7th September 1990 of the Federation of the Bank which referred to absorption of Badli Sepoys and the bipartite agreement entered between management and Union regarding the same which provides that a Badli worker who has more than 240 days worked in the permanent vacancy after February 1988 in a block of 12 months would be absorbed against clear vacancy as and when they arise.
Vide order dated 14/3/1996 the learned single Judge of the High Court allowed the writ petition and directed the bank to absorb him.
So the petitioner in terms of the aforesaid joint agreement and or numberms and or policies being item number 5 has rendered services more than 240 days of Badli service after 10th February 1988 in a block of 12 months of a calendar year.
That he was appointed as a Badli Subordinate Staff Sepoy against one permanent vacancy in the Shyamsunder Branch of the Bank of India on 30.10.1988 and worked there up to 16.04.1991, for about 492 days.
Since he did number receive any reply from the Bank, he moved a writ petition before the High Court seeking a direction to the bank for absorbing him as a regular employee.
Emphasis supplied Consequently, the learned single Judge directed the bank to absorb the Appellant herein.
Based on certain companyclusions arrived at by the learned Division Bench, the Appeal bearing MAT No.
On 16.4.1991 the Branch Manager of the bank asked him number to work anymore.
This order was carried in appeal before the Division Bench.
Hence, he has a legal right to be absorbed in the Respondent bank by virtue of the bipartite agreement.
This decision was challenged in Appeal before the Division Bench.
So I declare that the petitioner is entitled to be absorbed as having fulfilled the aforesaid criteria and or eligibilities.
Appellants case is as follows.
