264 of 1956 under Order XXXVII, C.P.C. V. Vishwanatha Sastri and Naunit Lal, for the appellant.
The suit was filed in the Court of the Commercial Subordinate Judge, Delhi, under 0.
896 D of 1956, arising out of the judgment and order dated November 1, 1956, of the Court of Commercial Subordinate Judge, Delhi in Suit No.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated December 17, 1956, of the Punjab High Court Circuit Bench at Delhi in Civil Misc.
As a result, they applied here under Art.
Accordingly, he permitted the defendants to appear and defend the suit on the companydition of their giving security to the extent of the suit amount and the companyts of the suit.
The defendants applied for leave to defend the suit under r. 3 of that Order.
60,000 drawn by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff and which, on presentation to the Bank, was dishonoured.
They then applied under Art.
136 and were granted special leave.
XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure.
227 of the Constitution to the Delhi Circuit Bench of the Punjab High Court and failed again.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The following Judgment of the Court was delivered by BOSE J. The defendants, Santosh Kumar and the Northern General Agencies, were granted special leave to appeal.
96 of 1957.
The defendants applied for a review but failed.
The plaintiff filed the suit out of which the 1213 appeal arises on the basis of a cheque for Rs.
February 5.
Bakhshi Gurcharan Singh and Sardar Singh, for the respondent.
