P3 occurrence report.
Prosecution, in support of the case, examined PW1 to PW6 and Ext.
As already stated, the trial Court, after appreciating the oral and documentary evidence, companyvicted the appellant under Section 55 a of the Abkari Act, for the offence companymitted and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for two years and six months and a fine of Rs.1 lakh, and in default, further rigorous imprisonment for six months, which, as already stated, was modified by the High Court.
After investigation, he laid the final report before the Judicial First Class Magistrates Court, Quilandy, where it was taken on file as P. No.19 of 2001.
MO1 was identified.
P5 were marked.
On the side of the accused, DW1 was examined.
After the prosecution evidence, the accused was examined under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The accused denied the incriminating circumstances appeared in the evidence against him.
S. Radhakrishnan, J. Leave granted.
The prosecution case is that on 15.9.1999 at 7.00 a.m., the appellant was found in possession of 10 litres of arrack while he was transporting the same through the road in between Mokavoor and Kypurathpalam.
The learned Magistrate companymitted the case to the Court of Sessions.
P1 to Ext.
PW6, Excise Inspector, registered Crime No.20 of 1999 through Ext.
