1 and its Manager H. Khan who was accused No.
5 to a fine of Rs.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated the February 4, 1955, of the Bombay High Court in Criminal Appeal No.
On December 13, 1951, the Conciliation Officer wrote to the appellant No.
1256 of 1954, arising out of the judgment and order dated June 19, 1954, of the Chief Presidency Magistrate, Bombay, in Case No.
The two appellants have appealed by special leave.
Some disputes arose between the appellant No.
On March 18, 1952, the appellant dismissed Louis Pereira, a bus companyductor and proceedings were taken on a companyplaint by Assistant Commissioner of Labour under s. 33 read with s. 31 of the Act against 5 accused persons the two appellants and the partners of appellant No.
I was asked to appear before the Conciliation Officer on January 9, 1952, and after getting one adjournment the appellant No.
250 and accused No.
On December 31, 1951, the appellant No.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
46 of 1957.
1 wrote to the Conciliation Officer saying that numberuseful purpose would be served by holding any further meetings.
1 and its workmen.
J. Umrigar and B. H. Dhebar, for the respondent.
April 21.
1 number appellant No.
5 number appellant No.
The State took an appeal to the High Court and the judgment of acquittal was reversed and of the accused persons the two appellants were companyvicted and the others were acquitted.
I and enclosed the demands of the Union which were dated August 9, 1951.
On May 9, 1952, the Union had also indicated to the Conciliation Officer that the negotiations had failed.
I appeared before the Conciliation Officer on January 17, 1952, and filed its Written Statement and raised various objections.
1 to a fine of Rs.
Hardayal Hardy, for the appellants.
176/S of 1953.
The next date of hearing was January 31, 1952, and the proceedings went on till June 2, 1952, when the appellant No.
1 5 under s. 31 1 read with s. 33 1 of the Industrial Disputes Act XIV of 1947 hereinafter called the Act and sentencing accused No.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KAPUR, J. This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment and order of the High Court of Bombay reversing the judgment of the Chief Presidency Magistrate, Bombay, and thus companyvicting accused Nos.
50, The appellants are the Andheri Marol Kurla Bus Service who was accused No.
