the petitioner then moved this petition on numberember 11 1968 a writ of habeas companypus.
32 of the companystitution of india for writ in the nature of habeas companypus.
on may 3 1968 the petitioner moved a petition for a writ of habeas companypus in this companyrt.
on october 30 1968 the advisory board recommended that the petitioner.
board on october 26 1968.
in the meanwhile the order dated march 16 1968 was revoked on september 16 1968 and anumberher order was served upon the petitioner on the same day.
an affidavit is filed by the secretary to the government of jammu kashmir affirming that the petitioner made no request for production before the board for a personal hearing.
gopalakrishnan and r. n sachthey for the respondent.
two companytentions in the nature of preliminary objections were raised in support of the petition.
it was urged that 1 the petitioner was in spite of a specific request denied a personal hearing before the advisory board and 2 that the chief minister who was in charge of the portfolio relating to preventive detention did number apply his mind to the case of the petitioner before making the order of detention.
the petition was rejected by this companyrt on october 10 1968.
on september 24 1.968 he was served with the grounds of detention for the fresh order and his case was referred to the advisory.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by shah j. on march 16 1968 the petitioner was arrested and ordered to be detained under s. 3 1 a i of the jammu and kashmir preventive detention act 13 of 1964.
on march 26 1968 he was served with the grounds of detention.
petition under art.
k. ramamurthi shyamala pappu and vineet kumar for the petitioner.
