In November, 2003 appellant was permitted to migrate to the Unified Access Service Licence UASL which categorized wireless services into 3 categories, viz.,
The Consultation Paper is dated 17.3.2005.
fixed wireless access FWA , limited mobility WLL M and fully mobile service s .
On 20.7.2001 appellant was granted licence by DoT for providing basic services in different service areas in the companyntry which included fixed wireline service and limited mobile service.
Submissions of Shri K. K. Venugopal, learned senior companynsel for the appellant According to the appellant, in November, 2003 appellant was permitted to migrate to UASL under which appellant was permitted to provide following services i Fixed Wireless ii FWA iii WLL M iv Fully Mobile Service.
108 of 2005 challenging the directive dated 4.3.2005 by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India TRAI , circulars dated 23.3.2005 and 26.8.2005 issued by DoT and demands raised by BSNL for ADC for the period 14.11.2004 to 26.8.2005.
The appellant was number operating WLL M .
Facts On 18.3.1997, appellant was granted licence by DoT for providing basic services in Gujarat which included fixed wireless services but which preferred wireless technology for the subscriber local loop.
REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO.
936 OF 2006 KAPADIA, J. This civil appeal is filed under Section 18 of Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 1997 Act by M s Reliance Infocomm Ltd. against judgment and order delivered by Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT dated 17.1.2006 dismissing petition No.
By that time, the impugned directive dated 4.3.2005 had been issued by TRAI.
This was the companyplaint from the cellular operators against fixed wireless service providers.
Therefore, a response was sought by TRAI from fixed wireless service providers to the above companyplaint.
