the central evidence in the case companysists of the testimony of the approver who has given the assential details of the prosecution case and the manner in which Jaggar Singh was taken to the Kotha of Zora Singh, PW 13 and then taken in a taxi brought by Zora Singh, to a lonely place and thereafter decoyed to a jungle where he was shot.
Sarup Singh bore serious animus against the deceased Jagga Singh because he had given evidence in a murder case against the brother of Sarup Singh and on the basis of his Jaggar evidence the brother of Sarup Singh was companyvicted and sentenced to imprisonment for life.
This recovery does number appear to be of any importance because PW 8 Tej Kaur, the widow of Jaggar Singh has clearly admitted that her husband Jaggar Singh had illicit intimacy with the appellant and for that reason show was number treated well by her husband.
In the first place, reliance was placed on the recovery of a gold ring belonging to the deceased from the trunk at the instance of the appellant Mukhtiar Kaur.
According to the prosecution, Jagga Singh was picked up from his house and taken first to the kotha of Hardayal Singh and thereafter to the kotha of Zora Singh, PW 13.
This appears to be the main motive for hatching the companyspiracy to kill Jaggar Singh.
The appellant is said to have accompanied Sirup Singh and Hardayal Singh, the approver.
