On March 31, 1967 a money decree for a little over Rs.
2193 50 to which the defendant judgment debtor is entitled, subject to any claim of the said J. D. and the said Pay and Accounts Officer is hereby prohibited and restrained, until the further order of this companyrt from delivering of the said property to any person.
Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated the 1st May, 1970 of the Delhi High Court in Civil Revision No.
A warrant or attachment of the funds of respondent No.
516/66 in favour of M s Jyoti Chit Fund and Finance P. Ltd., for Rs.
4, in the hands of the Rajya Sabha Secretariat, was sought and ordered.
3, Shri S. Krishnaswamy, an ex reporter has failed to satisfy a decree passed against him on the 31st day of March, 1967 in suit No.
Given under my hand and seal of the Court on 12th day of September 1968.
The decree holder respondent 1 successfully companytested in the trial companyrt and on the objection being over ruled, the appellant moved the High Court.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
516 of 1966 in favour of respondent No.
1 and against respondents 2 to 4 who are ex parte .
26 of 1970.
2,000/ was passed in Suit No.
On service of the attachment order, objection was raised by the appellant, Union of India, on January 30, 1969 on the score that provident fund amounts and pensionary benefits were number liable to attachment and therefore the order may be rescinded.
It reads To The Pay Accounts Officer, Rajya Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi.
The appellant, the Union of India, has companye up in appeal, by special leave, challenging a laconic order of dismissal in Civil Revision made by the Delhi High Court, thus upholding the view of the executing companyrt over ruling the companytention of the State, objecting to the attachment of certain provident fund and pension dues held by Union of India on behalf of the Rajya Sabha Secretariat in trust for the judgment debtor who had been employed in the Rajya Sabha Secretariat.
2193 50.
L. Sanghi, Girish Chandra and S. P. Nayar for the Appellants.
Whereas judgment debtor No.
2179 of 1970.
Sd Sub Judge 1st Class, Delhi.
We may number move on to a companysideration of the basic companytentions and, before that, the basic facts may be briefly set down.
The objections, if made, will be decided afresh on merits.
It is ordered that the defendant judgment debtor is hereby prohibited and restrained until the further order of this Court from receiving from the Pay and Accounts Officer the following property in possession of the said Pay and Accounts Officer that is to say Rs.
