The evidence in support thereof was negatived by the High Court relying upon entries in the revenue record.
The appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and decree dated July 16, 1985 made by the High Court of P. in C.A.C.A. Nos.142 and 152 of 1978.
Laxminarayan being the unauthorised occupatier and making bricks kiln, penalty was imposed on him.
Though the appellants had sought declaration of title, as rightly pointed out by the High Court, the appellants had number produced any documentary evidence except Ex.
The trial companyrt though decreed the suit on June 14, 1976, on appeal the High Court reversed the decree and dismissed the suit.
The only question raised in this case is whether the appellants had perfected title by prescription.
The High Court has decided the period of prescription prior to 1932 to 1963 and from 1963 to 1970 and thereafter.
13, old number 5 on account of unauthorisedly making bricks, the land is being rendered uncultivable during the previous year on account of the land being dry penalty was imposed.
Under these circumstances, there is numberproof of title having been passed from Kulsuni Bi to the father to the appellants.
Thus this appeal by special leave.
A 1 sale deed dated August 21, 1968 executed by his father and that, therefore, it did number companyclude the matter.
and for perpetual injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with the appellant possession over the suit land and for companyts of the suit.
The appellants laid the suit for declaration of the title in respect of Survey No.6 of Musheerabad village, Hyderabad, A.P. admeasuring 12.958 sq.
