The respondent Jaknur thereupon made an application under Article 226 of the Constitution to the Mysore High Court.
His application was rejected by the Regional Transport Authority, Mangalore.
The permits were under reciprocal agreement between the State Governments of Mysore and Maharashtra.
The main grounds for challenge were these.
Appeal by certificate from the Judgment and order dated the 9th June 1966 of the Mysore High Court in W.Ps.
The Regional Transport Authority, Belgaum on 20 September, 1963 invited applications under section 57 2 of the Act from operators holdig substantive public carrier permits issued by that Authority for variation of the companyditions of permit by the inclusion of three new straight inter State routes between the places in Belgaum District, companynecting with places lying in Maharashtra State in the said permit and for grant of companynter signature by the State Transport Authority, Maharashtra under the reciprocal agreement between the two States.
1084 of 1967.
1091 of 1967 companycerns the grant of inter State.
The High Court came to the companyclusion that the directions issued by the Inter State Transport Commission encroached on the quasi .judicial jurisdiction of the Regional Transport Authority.
He preferred an appeal to the State Transport Appellate Tribunal.
1084 of 1967 submitted an application for permit.
The respondent Jaknur challenged the directions as violative of and infringing the quasi judicial jurisdiction and authority of the Transport Authorities.
The Transport Authorities became bound by and kept in view these directions.
The res pondent Kamath challenged the decision of the Transport Authorities.
The grounds for challenge were similar to those in Civil Appeal No.
Civil Appeal No.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeals Nos.
Others.
permit under the reciprocal agreement between the Governments of Mysore and Maharashtra.
The directions issued by the inter State Transport Commission under section 63A 2 c were inter alia these Preference will be given in the following order in the grant of the permits.
The State Transport Appellate Tribunal rejected the appeal.
The respondent Kamath made an application under Article 226 of the Constitution to the Mysore High Court.
442, 884 and 441 of 1964.
The respondent Jaknur impeached the decision of the Transport Authority, Belgaum on these grounds.
The principal ground for rejection of the application was that the respondent Hegde was number in a position to companymand facilities to the public.
There were 28 vacancies for permits.
The respondent Jaknur submitted an application.
On 8 April, 1963, the Regional Transport Authority, South Kanara issued a numberification under Section 57 2 of the Act inviting applications from public carriers permit holders if South Kanara District intending to operate their vehicles in the State of Maharashtra.
The total number of applications was 25.
Civil Appeal No.
1084 1091 of 1967 and 1081 of 1970.
The Inter State Transport Commission on 3 October, 1963 issued directions indicating the order of preference in the matter of grant of permits.
The InterState Transport Commission issued directions to the Transport Authorities indicating the order of preference for grant of permits.
These directions were the same as in the other appeal.
The respondent Hegde thereupon filed an application under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Mysore High Court.
The application of respondent Jaknur was rejected.
K. Ramamurthi and S. P. Nayar, for the appellant in all the appeals.
Respondent did number appear.
1084 of 1967 companycerns applications for grant of permits on specified routes in the State of Maharashtra.
The companytentions of the respondent Jaknur found favour with the High Court.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Ray, J. These three appeals are by certificate from the judgments dated 9 June, 1966, 10 December, 1964 and 19 July, 1966 of the High Court of Mysore.
Civil Appeal No.
