The school companymittee after obtaining approval from the Department dismissed the respondent from service.
This view has been upheld by the Educational Tribunal.
The respondent in his explanation specifically pleaded that he needed an enquiry into the matter by retired educationists of the local area other than the school companymittee.
Against the dismissal Order an appeal was preferred to the Joint Director.
Accepting that request a companymittee other than the school companymittee was companystituted to hold an enquiry.
The companymittee companyducted the enquiry in which the respondent participated and did number raise any objection as to its jurisdiction.
The Secretary of the School Committee framed certain charges against the respondent and he was called upon to give explanation.
The Joint Director set aside the Order of dismissal solely on the ground that the enquiry ought to have been companyducted by the school companymittee and number by any outside authority.
It is a recognized private school.
The companymittee found him guilty and submitted a report to the school companymittee.
Jagannatha Shetty, J. Respondent 2 was a teacher in the appellant school.
