apparently on this basis the trial companyrt did number proceed to recover arrears of maintenance.
136 of the companystitution.
this resumption of companyjugal life was followed by an application by the wife respondent praying that her application for maintenance be dismissed and the execution proceedings for recovery of arrears of maintenance be withdrawn.
criminal appellate jurisdiction review petition number 95 of 1978.
she moved the magistrate having jurisdiction over the subject matter for grant of maintenance under sec.
the order of the companyrt was delivered by krishna iyer j. a short narrative of the facts is necessary to explore and explode the submission that a substantial question of law arises which merits grant of leave under art.
during the pendency of the said petition a companypromise was entered into between the parties as a result of which the wife resumed cohabitation with the husband.
puri for the petitioner.
metha and p.n.
125 of the criminal procedure companye.
r. nagaraja s.k.
the respondent is the wife of the petitioner.
