the respondent was admitted into tenancy of the premises in question under a lease deed dated 5th january 1968.
the companytroller did number accept the defence and passed an order for eviction.
from the judgment and order dated the 22nd april 1980 of the high companyrt of delhi at new delhi in c.r.
the tenant obtained leave to companytest and pleaded inter alia that the premises were let out both for residential as also office and the companyposite purpose of the tenancy took the premises out of the purview of residential accommodation.
petition number 336 of 1979.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 2999 of 1980.
sharma for the respondent.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by ranganath misra j. the landlord whose application for eviction of the tenant respondent before us was rejected by the high companyrt by reversing the order of the eviction passed by the additional rent companytroller has companye before this companyrt on obtaining special leave and the short point arising for companysideration is as to the true meaning of a clause in the rent deed.
menumber and r.k.
parekh p.k.
