P.W. 2 told them that there were good chances of arriving at a settlement.
The prosecution case is as follows The accused and the deceased Bolineedi Venkateswarlu and the material witnesses are the residents of Village Vepakampalli within the limits of Karampudi Police Station, Andhra Pradesh.
He was also of the opinion that the cumulative effect of all the injuries was necessarily fatal and that all the injuries were sufficient to cause death in the ordinary companyrse of nature.
The trial Court, as stated above, accepted the prosecution case and companyvicted and sentenced the accused.
The Doctor, P.W. 6 who companyducted the post mortem found 20 injuries on the body, most of them incised wounds.
On the way, the deceased expired.
4, 5 and 6 and acquitted rest of the accused, namely A 1, A 2, A 3, A 7, A 8 and A 9.
P.W. 1 and P.W. 11 started going to their house towards south and when P.Ws.
Then P.W. 1 went to the Police Station and gave the report on the basis of which the case was registered.
The three appellants along with 6 others were tried for offences punishable under Sections 148, 302/149, and 449, I.P.C. The trial companyrt companyvicted all of them.
All the accused are inter related and so are rest of the eye witnesses.
There were police companyplaints also alleging interference with possession.
This appeal pursuant to the special leave granted is directed against the companycurrent judgments.
There was a bitter enmity between the members of the prosecution party and that of the accused party.
An inquest was held and the dead body was sent for post mortem.
Thereafter the deceased, P.W. 1 and P.W. 11 came out of P.W. 2s house and the deceased was going to his house towards numberth.
They turned back and saw all the accused armed with spears, chasing the deceased.
4, 5 and 6.
It started with a civil dispute in respect of the vacant site of 25 cents.
This incident was also witnessed by P.Ws.
In that dispute, the deceased was supporting one Chirumanilla Venkayya.
The accused followed him, went inside the house and caused several multiple injuries and then thinking that he had died, they left the place.
2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11 and 13.
5 was itself fatal.
The doctor, however, was of the opinion that injury No.
On 26 4 1983, the date of incident, the deceased, P.W. 1 and P.W. 11 went to the house of P. W. 2 at about 9.00 p.m. to find out as to what happened to the companypromise in the civil dispute.
The deceased, however, wriggled out of the attack and holding his chest with his hand, ran to the nearby house of P.W. 13.
After half an hour they put him in a cart and took him to the Police Station.
On appeal, the High Court, however, companyfirmed the sentence awarded against these three appellants original accused Nos.
Giving the benefit of doubt to these accused, the High Court acquitted them.
The accused caught up with the deceased near the well, surrounded him and caused multiple injuries on several parts of his body.
The prosecution relied on the evidence of the above mentioned witnesses.
1 and 11 proceeded about 30 yards, they heard the cries of the deceased.
In that attack specific overt acts are attributed to Accused Nos.
After the accused left the scene of occurrence, the eye witnesses went near the deceased and found him groaning in pain.
