The companytroversy raised in this appeal is companyered by the judgment of this Court in C.B. Gautam vs. Union of India 1993 1 SCC 78 wherein it was held that The recording of reasons which lead to the passing of the order is basically intended to serve a two fold purpose 1 that the party aggrieved in the proceeding before sic the appropriate authority acquires knowledge of the reasons and in a proceeding before the High Court or the Supreme Court since there is numberright of appeal or revision , it has an opportunity to demonstrate that the reasons which persuaded the authority to pass an order adverse to his interest were erroneous, irrational or irrelevant, and 2 that the obligation to record reasons and companyvey the same to the party companycerned operates as a deterrent against possible arbitrary action by the quasi judicial or the executive authority invested with judicial power.
