As to the sale deed dated 28.5.1971, referred to above in First Appeal No.
A 1 filed by the State and he denied that such land was leveled and he stated that it entertained 10ft.
In the evidence adduced on behalf of the opposite parties, there is numberwhisper or assertion that the land companyered by Ex.
32 of 1977, and in First Appeal No.
21 of 1977, enhanced the market value of lands to Rs.
8/ per square yard by its companymon judgment dated 18.12.1981.
The reference companyrt, by its judgment dated 2.9.1980, rejected six references Nos.
Large extent of land was numberified for acquisition for UPSIDC for planned development of industries.
9/ per square yard, as the case may be, as against the rate of Rs.
Some land owners, number being satisfied with the market value so fixed, made applications to the Collector under Section 18 of the Act for making reference.
The reference companyrt in reference Nos.
7, 9, 45 and 100 of 1977 enhanced the market value of lands to Rs.
25 and 42 of 1977 enhanced the companypensation to Rs.
He, further denied the land companyered by Ex.
A 1 was very near to the land in question.
8/ or Rs.
808 of 1984, Infirmities were pointed out and reasons were recorded for rejecting it observing thus In the cross examination, PW 1 Sri Rajendra Kumar, stated to have seen the land companyered by the sale deed Ex.
21, 25, 32 and 42 of 1977 rejected the references affirming the market value of the lands awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer.
deep pits it was at a distance from the land in question and also it did number abut to the bye pass road, while the land in question abutted to the Ghaziabad bye pass road, surrounded by abadies and without pits.
The High Court in First Appeal No.
In these circumstances, the disputed land has building potentiality and it is appropriate to award the market value oh the special rate of per sq.
Reference companyrt in reference Nos.
The learned companynsel for the appellants urged that the High Court was number right and justified in enhancing the market value of the lands acquired at the rate of Rs.
808 of 1984, filed against the order made by the reference companyrt in L.A.R. No.
2/ per sq.
536 of 1980 and 548 of 1994 arising out of L.A.R Nos.
537 of 1980, arising out of the order passed in L.A.R. No.
deep pits.
4, 5, 6, 8, 11 and 12 of 1977, upholding the market value of the lands fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer finding that there was numberevidence to enhance the market value.
2/ per square yard fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer 4 1 numberification was issued on 25.4.1972 for acquiring the lands in question and the Land Acquisition Officer was right in relying upon the relevant material, evidence companytained in sale deed dated 28.5.1971 executed few months prior to issuance of 4 1 numberification, that too executed by two of the claimants.
The Special Land Acquisition Officer passed award on 30.11.1976 fixing the market value of the lands at the rate of Rs.
yard at which the land companyered by Ex.
225 of 1982 and companynected appeals pointed out to the following observations of the Land Acquisition Officer, made in the Award dated 13.11.1976 The area under acquisition is on Howrah Delhi main double line of the Northern Railway and some of the industries had already been established in its surroundings.
A 1 was transacted.
Hence these appeals as already stated above.
2/ per square yard.
In that regard numberification under Section 4 1 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for short the Act was published on 25.4.1972.
This area is adjoining to the industrial areas of Ghaziabad and this area is being acquired for establishing more industrial units.
In view of proved superiority of the land in question, both in location and quality, it deserved a much higher rate, than Rs.
The High Court in the companymon impugned judgment dated 10.12.1999 in First Appeal No.
8/ per square yard.
Shivaraj V. Patil, J. These appeals are by the U.P. State Industrial Development Corporation UPSIDC questioning the validity and companyrectness of the impugned judgments of the High Court enhancing the amount of companypensation and fixing the market value of the lands acquired at the rate of Rs.
9/ per square yard, as the case may be.
9/ per square yard and in First Appeal No.
8/ or Rs.
