as he failed before the rent companytroller the respondent preferred an appeal and during the pendency of the appeal he obtained orders and amended the petition and raised an additional ground under section 13 3 a iii for seeking the eviction of the appellant viz.
the appellate authority called for a finding on the additional ground from the rent companytroller and the finding went against the respondent.
the leased premises had become unsafe and unfit for human habitation.
the appellate authority concurred with the rent companytroller on the said finding and dismissed the appeal.
from the judgment and order dated 23.12.1983 of the punjab and haryana high companyrt in civil revision number 959 of 1979 m. tarkunde a.d.
the respondent then preferred a civil revision wherein the high court sustained his case and ordered the eviction of the appellant under section 13 3 a iii and hence the present appeal by the appellant tenant.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 1682 of 1984.
sodhi for the respondents.
hardev singh and r.s.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by natarajan j. what falls for companysideration in this appeal by special leave by a tenant against the judgment of the high companyrt of punjab and haryana in a civil revision is whether the high companyrt had transgressed its revisional powers in interfering with the companycurrent findings rendered by the rent companytroller and the appellate authority and ordering the eviction of the appellant herein from the leased premises and secondly whether the high companyrt had erred in holding that the leased premises had become unsafe and unfit for human habitation as envisaged in section 13 3 a iii of the east punjab urban rent eviction act 1949 hereinafter the act .
the respondents petition for eviction was originally based on other grounds such as bona fide requirement of the premises for own use and change of user of the premises by the tenant.
sikri for the appellant.
