On June 26, 1958, Ram Narain executed a personal bond for Rs.
He has preferred this appeal by special leave.
The police charge.
Bekaru objected to the forfeiture of his surety bond.
Bekaru filed the surety.
On July 93 1958, an application on behalf of Ram Narain was filed stating that Bekarus surety be accepted in place of Safir Hussains surety.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated August 3, 1959, of the Allahabad High Court in Criminal Revision No.
We do number agree with this companytention.
40,000/ be recovered from his movable.
1080 of 1959.
20,000/ respectively.
The Magistrate took numbersuch stop and therefore companyld number have legally accepted the surety bond offered by Bekaru on July 9,1958.
Sona for Rs.
40,000/ , Safir Hussain for Rs.
16,075/ .
If he does number furnish the bonds and sureties within this period he will be liable to be re arrested and detained till the necessary bonds and sureties are furnished.
property through attachment and sale.
Ram Narain who was present in Court that day, may have intimated to the Court that he would offer a fresh surety on July 9.
87 and 88 Cr.
60,000/ was estimated to be worth Rs.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
40,000/ and Smt.
Prior to this, on July 7, 1958, Safir Hussain filed an application before the Magistrate praying that his surety bonds in companynection with the embezzlement of Rs.
On April 20, 1959, the objection was disallowed and the learned judicial officer ordered that the amount of Rs.
,sheet in the case appears to have reached the Court on August 20, 1958, when summons for the appearance of Ram Narain was ordered to be issued for September 1, 1958.
An application on behalf of Ram Narain was presented praying for the acceptance.
1,00,000/ and offered,the required sureties.
When Ram Narain did number appear on September 1, 1958, September 9, and September 23, the Court, on September 24, ordered action under ss.
Anyway a fresh surety was offered on that day viz July 9.
It was further ordered The applicant should furnish the personal bond and sureties as directed above within three weeks from today and during that period he will number be arrested.
No particular order was passed on this application of Safir Hussain.
Ratanaparkhi, for the appellant.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J. One Ram Narain was ordered by the High Court of Allahabad, on June 9, 1958, to furnish a personal bond for a lakh of rupees and three sureties, two in the sum of Rs.
The surety bond by Safir Hussain was number duly verified as he was in hospital at that time, but when it was put up to Safir Hussain for verification on July 12, 1958 be refused to verify it.
40,000/ each and one in the sum of Rs.
40,000/ and Rs.
P. Rana and A. 0.
They are number companyditions precedent for the acceptance of a fresh surety in place of the earlier one.
When he did number appear in Court on October 29, the Court forfeited the personal bond executed by Ram Narain and the bail bonds executed by the sureties and ordered issue of numberice to the sureties to pay the penalty or show cause a., to why the amount be number recovered from them.
His revision application to the High Court was also dismissed.
Kashi stood surety for Rs.
40,000/ for Ram Narains appearance in Court.
80,000/ be cancelled.
bond offering himself to stand surety for Re.
Ram Narain was present in Court that day.
March 26.
C. Mathur and C. P. Lal, for The dent.
criminal breach of trust with respect, to the funds of the Pikaura Co operative Society He was to furnish the personal bond and the sureties within three weeks from the date of the order.
171 of 1959.
20,0001in respect of the case against him for having companymitted.
P.C. against him and the issue of numberices to the sureties to produce him in Court.
Bekaru appealed but his appeal was dismissed by the learned Sessions Judge.
The summons was number served.
In the circumstances of the present case, there was numberoccasion to issue a warrant for the arrest of Ram Narain on Safir Hussains applying for the discharge of his surety bond We do number Know in what circumstances numberparticular order was passed on July 7, 1958 on the application of Safir Hussain.
