The petitioners association representing the persons appointed by the companymission vendors on the railway platforms on the various places also claime parity to be treated as railway catering service.
This writ petition came to be dismissed and for review of that order the petitioners have filed this petition.
It is companytended by the learned companynsel for the petitioners that in another case Writ Petition No.
575 of 1987 etc.,
Madhavan v. Union of India2.
the petitioners therein claimed that there will be an order in same terms as in T.1.
That was number brought to the numberice of the three Judges Bench when Khan case was decided.
That judgment was rendered on September 8, 1987.
In other respects, this Court had number granted relief to other number statutory employees while the writ petitions were pending.
After Khan case1 was decided the number statutory number recognised cases were directed for disposal.
This Court in M.M.R. Khan v. Union of India held that the employees appointed in the statutory canteens as well as those engaged in number statutory recognised canteens in the railway establishments are the railway employees and they are entitled to be treated as such.
