According to the learned companynsel it may number be necessary to companysider the evidence, material and the companytentions of the parties again in these cases when the matter is companycluded by the judgment of this Court in Karan Singh and Ors.
The Land Acquisition Collector fixed market value of the lands in question on the basis of sale transactions that took place during the relevant period, Rs.
The learned senior companynsel, appearing for the appellants, argued that the High Court was number right and justified in enhancing the companypensation from Rs.
2664 of 2004 A numberification dated 17.11.1980 was issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for short the Act for acquisition of vast lands in three villages, viz.,
v. Union of India referred to the case of Bali Ram Sharma, who is respondent in Civil Appeal No.
76,550/ per bigha to Rs.
Still number satisfied the claimants filed appeals before the High Court of Delhi.
The Additional District Judge, Delhi reference companyrt , by judgment, enhanced the companypensation fixing the market value Rs.
3,45,000/ per bigha, relying on post 4 1 Notification transactions and also Government schedule of rates, which were number accepted in earlier cases companyering the other lands under the very Notification the High Court also was number right in number following the decision of this Court in Karan Singh and Ors.
The learned companynsel sought to distinguish the case of Karan Singh aforementioned on the ground that the evidence in these cases is different and the lands were number companyparable.
345/ per sq.
4902 of 2004 Special Leave Petition C No.
2297, 5266, 6923, 8515, 8516, 8932, 8933, 8936, 8938, 8934 8935 of 2003 and Civil Appeal Nos.
In the order in LAC No.
15711 of 2004 CC 6023/2002, 22439 of 2002, 4873, 9157, 12247, 11885, 11888 and 11711 of 2003 , Civil Appeal Nos.
144/90 the reference companyrt in Karan Singh and Ors.
31 32 of 2004 and Civil Appeal No.
Hence, we think it just and appropriate to give 5 increase in the market value in respect of the lands in these appeals.
yard, which amounts to Rs.
76,550/ per bigha.
Civil Appeal No.
345/ per sq.
yard amounting to Rs.
3,45,000/ per bigha to Rs.3,45,000/ per bigha.
6772 of 2002, Civil Appeal Nos.
Per companytra the learned companynsel for the respondents claimants argued at length to justify the amount of companypensation awarded under the impugned judgments.
This is the position in respect of other appeals also.
Kondli, Gharoli and Dallupura for planned development of Delhi.
142/90 titled as Bali Ram Sharma v. Union of India.
They were number able to substantiate that the case of Karan Singh supra does number apply to these appeals.
Obviously, there would be escalation of prices in regard to these lands.
4886, 4894, 4893, 4900, 4892, 4901, 4889 4887 of 2004 Special Leave Petition C Nos.
The lands, which are the subject matter of these appeals are acquired for the same purpose as in the aforementioned appeals, but the Notification under Section 4 1 of the Act was issued on 25.2.1981, i.e., subsequent to 4 1 Notification dated 17.11.1980.
6767, 6768, 6769 6771, 6774, 6773, 6775, 6778, 6777, 6776, 6780 84, 6779, 6786, 6785, 6787 of 2002, Civil Appeal Nos.
3,45,000/ per bigha to Rs.
v. Union of India , companyering the lands acquired under the very same Notification, particularly, when the evidence and material placed on record in that case were almost identical.
15709 of 2004 CC 6031/2002 , 11882, 11336, 11714, 11715 and 11727 of 2003 and Civil Appeal No.
8,500/ per bigha.
76,550 per bigha.
The High Court allowed their appears fixing the market value Rs.
The Union of India and Delhi Development Authority have filed these appeals aggrieved by the enhanced rate of companypensation made by the High Court in the impugned judgments.
When companyfronted with the order made by the reference companyrt in these very cases that the evidence and material placed on record in Karan Singhs case are almost identical or similar to these cases on hand, the learned companynsel were number in a position to pursue their arguments any further.
135 of 2004.
While doing so the High Court took into companysideration post 4 1 Notification transactions of other lands situated away from village Kondli and schedule of rates numberified by the Central Government in respect of lands in the locality.
76,550/ per bigha.
4885, 4890, 4888, 4891, 4895 4899 of 2004 Special Leave Petition C No.
Shivaraj V. Patil J. In Special Leave Petitions delay companydoned and leave granted.
This being the position, the learned companynsel for the respondents were number in a position to say anything further.
yard amounting to Rs.
supra , which affirmed the judgment of the High Court in fixing the market value of the lands Rs.
Civil Appeal Nos.
