He was promoted to Inspector Grade II on 1.3.1979 and retired on 31.8.1993.
Hence the present appeal.
Respondent in C.A.No.
He retired on 31 7 1983.
Respondent in C.A.No.7320 was appointed as Co operative Supervisor on 8.10.1959.
Aggrieved thereby, the appellant filed a Writ Petition before the High Court, which was dismissed by the impugned order of the High Court.
He retired on 30.6.1994.
He retired on 31.1.1991.
He retired on 31 3 1989.
Legally speaking, therefore, the aforesaid decision squarely companyers the facts of the present case.
In fact, in a similar case involving similar facts, the question of law has been decided by this Court on 31.1.2006 in Civil Appeal Nos.7340 7341 of 2003 with Civil Appeal Nos.7315 7316 of 2003, 7317/2003 and 7319 of 2003 titled State of U.P. Ors.
The Tribunal by an order dated 17.8.1994 allowed the claim and directed that the period from 1.2.1959 to 31.7.1989 be reckoned towards the respondents total length of service for the purpose of determining family pension and gratuity.
Under Rule 5 of the Subordinate Co operative Service Rules, 1979 the promotion to the post of Co operative Inspector Grade II is either by direct recruitment or by promotion through the State Public Service Commission.
7350, 7320, 7321, 7322, 7323, 7324, 7325, 7326, 7327, 7328, 7329, 7330, 7331, 7332, 7333, 7334, 7335, 7336, 7337, 7338 7339, 7342, 7343 7349, 7351, 7352 of 2003, C.A.No.
He was promoted to the post of Co operative Inspector Grade II on 7.11.1978 and retired on 31.1.1989.
Respondent in C.A.No.7322 of 2003 was appointed as Co operative Supervisor on 1.2.1956.
Respondent in C.A.No.7323 of 2003 was appointed as Co operative Supervisor on 15.12.1947.
Respondent in C.A.No.7325 of 2003 was appointed as Co operative Supervisor on 22.3.1958.
Respondent in C.A.No.7327 of 2003 was appointed as Co operative Supervisor on 17.2.1958.
Respondent in C.A.No.7328 of 2003 was appointed as Co operative Supervisor on 15.7.1952.
Respondent in C.A.No.7329 of 2003 was appointed as Co operative Supervisor on 24.6.1959.
Respondent in C.A.No.7331 of 2003 was appointed as Co operative Supervisor on 2.1.1958.
Respondent in C.A.No.7335 of 2003 was appointed as Co operative Supervisor on 16.2.1961.
Respondent in C.A.No.7336 of 2003 was appointed as Co operative Supervisor on 14.4.1958.
Respondent in C.A.No.7337 of 2003 was appointed as Co operative Supervisor on 12.8.1957.
Respondent in C.A.No.7338 of 2003 was appointed as Co operative Supervisor on 22.3.1958.
Respondent in C.A.No.7344 of 2003 was appointed as Co operative Supervisor on 1.1.1951.
Respondent in C.A.No.7352 of 2003 was appointed as Co operative Supervisor on 19.1.1953.
Respondent in C.A.No.7333 of 2003 was appointed as Co operative Supervisor w.e.f 31.3.1958.
Respondent in C.A.No.7332 of 2003 was appointed as Co operative Supervisor on 2.5.1958.
Civil Appeal Nos.7317 and 7319 of 2003 filed by the respondents were dismissed.
He was promoted to the post of Co operative Inspector Grade II vide order dated 15.5.1985.
Respondent in C.A.No.7350 of 2003 was appointed as Co operative Supervisor on 5.4.1956.
Respondent in C.A.No.7321 of 2003 was appointed as Co operative Supervisor on 1.12.1954.
He was promoted to Inspector Grade II on 5.8.1978 and retired on 31.7.1994.
He retired on 30.6.1986.
He was promoted to the post of Co operative Inspector Grade II on 1.2.1964.
He was promoted to the post of Co operative Inspector Grade II on 29.4.1962.
He was promoted to the post of Co operative Inspector Grade II on 20.2.1977.
He was promoted to the post of Co operative Inspector Grade II on 25.5.1985.
He was promoted to the post of Co operative Inspector Grade II on 7.5.1963.
He was promoted to the post of Co operative Inspector Grade II on 25.11.1988.
He was promoted to the post of Co operative Inspector Grade II on 29.5.1976.
He was promoted to the post of Co operative Inspector Grade II on 31.5.1994.
He was promoted to the post of Co operative Inspector Grade II on 24.5.1985.
He was promoted to the post of Co operative Inspector Grade II on 16.7.1979.
He was promoted to the post of Co operative Inspector Grade II on 25.5.1985.
He was promoted to the post of Co operative Inspector Grade II on 8.9.1965.
He was promoted to the post of Co operative Inspector Grade II on 16.10.1971.
He was promoted to the post of Co operative Inspector Grade II on 9.5.1985.
He was promoted to the post of Co operative Inspector Grade II on 25.5.1985 and retired on 31.7.1991.
versus Roshan Singh Ors.
Respondent in C.A.No.7318 of 2003 was appointed as Co operative Supervisor, which is a number government post on 1.02.1959.
5242 of 2006 arising out of SLP civil No.22787 of 2002 and W.P. Civil No.647 of 2002.
He was promoted to the post of Co operative Inspector Grade II on 15.1.1971.
He retired on 30 6 1989.
He retired on 31.7.1983.
He retired on 31.1.1994.
He retired on 31.7.1993.
He retired on 31.7.1997.
He retired on 31.12.1994.
He retired on 31.7.1986.
He retired on 31.12.1994.
He retired on 31.7.1985.
He retired on 30.11.1989.
He retired on 31.1.1995.
All the respondents claimed that the period they have worked as Co operative Supervisor which is a number governmental post be reckoned towards the period for companyputing the pensionary benefits as government servants.
This Court, by the aforesaid judgment allowed the appeals of the appellants in C.A.Nos.7340 7341 and 7315 16 of 2003.
7326 of 2003 was appointed as Co operative Supervisor on 22.6.1959.
He retired from service on 31.07.1989 as Co operative Inspector Grade II.
5243 of 2006 arising out of SLP Civil No.21480 of 2002 and C.A.No.
He was companyfirmed in the post on 30.04.1972.
WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS.
Leave granted in both the Special Leave Petitions.
22787 of 2002.
The Tribunal further directed that the respondent would also be entitled to arrears of pension and gratuity.
In 1993, he filed a claim petition before the Tribunal inter alia claiming that the period of his service rendered as Co operative Supervisor be reckoned for the purpose of gratuity, leave encashment, family pension and other retiral benefits.
Respondent in C.A.No.7334 of 2003 was holding the post of Co operative Supervisor.
We have heard Dr.R.G. Padia, learned senior companynsel, Mrs. Shobha Dikshit, learned senior companynsel Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Mr.Shakil Ahmed Syed, Mr.Ramesh Chandra Mishra, Mr.Girdhar G. Upadhyay, Mr.Rameshwar Prasad Goyal and Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh, learned companynsel appearing for different appellants respondents.
He was promoted to the post of Co operative Inspector Grade II on 7.10.1977.
We may briefly numberice the facts of each case.
K.SEMA,J. Delay companydoned in S.L.P. Civil No.
