This haveing been agreed upon, the price fixed by the State Government in excess of the minimum price fixed by the Central Government under Clause 3 of the Order would be the price fixed for upply of sugarcane and the Governemnt would beentitled to enforce the liablity.
The cane growers supplied the sugarcane to the appellant, but the appellant admittedly had paid the minimum price determined under the Order but the difference between the price fixed under the order and the price announced the State Government was number paid.
The certificate obviously relates to the difference between the minimum price fixed by the Central government, i.e., Rs.
As a companysequence, the Collector was empowered and duty dbound to issue a vcertrificate of the dues as arrears of land revenue for recoery under the Revenue Recorvery Act.
13.92 per quintal, the State Government was devoid of power of fix the price at Rs.
For a certificate proceeding what is required to be proceeded is the due in accordance with law but number in accordance with any order passed by the State Government.,
13.92 per quintal and the price of Rs.20.50 determined by the agreement between the parties.
1811 14/96 decided on October 10,1996 by a Bench of two judges, to which two of us K.ramaswamy and B.Pattanaik, JJ.
As a companysequence, the Collector gave a certificate of dues for realisation under the Revenue Recovery Act.
20.50 per quintal.
