It is number in dispute that the Commissioner of Labour in his letter dated September 5/7, 1985 had informed the appellants that the list of the names forwarded by the Employment Exchange was fake one and their names were fabricated as they do number companyrespond to the entries in the Employment Exchange.
In the discharge order, it was stated that the respondents had exercised the power under Rule 34 b of the West Bengal Service Regulations Part I and the instructions companytained in Memo No.41452 dated November 22, 1985 of the Assistant Inspector General of Police, West Bengal.
The admitted position is that the respondents came to be appointed by proceedings dated April 25/26, 1985 as Constables in the State Armed Police.
On appeal, it was companyfirmed in MFA No.682/1987 by order dated March 26, 1991.
They are discharged from the service by proceedings effective from January 1, 1986 which came to be challenged in the High Court.
The High Court has set aside the order of discharge.
Heard learned companynsel on both sides.
The basis for their recruitment was the list furnished by the Employment Exchange, Katwa.
Leave granted.
Thus this appeal by special leave.
