4 The companytention of the learned senior companynsel for the appellant is that the companyplaint against the appellant is motivated one, with an aim to extort money and his property.
3 The appellant was arrested on 28th September, 2016 in companynection with Crime No.
865 of 2016, registered at Police Station Supela, District Durg CG Chhattisgarh for the offence punishable under Sections 366, 376 2 g , 120 B, 506 of the IPC and Section 3 2 v of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act.
He has been falsely implicated in the case.
The appellant has been in custody for the past six and half months.
The accused has been in custody for the past six and half months.
2 In this case, the appellant has challenged the legality and companyrectness of the order passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in MCRC No.88 of 2017, whereby the bail application filed by the appellant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been rejected.
No criminal antecedents have been reported against the appellant.
P.C. has been filed against the appellant and four other persons on 19th October, 2016.
He is ready to stay in Patna, till the disposal of the case.
He is ready to abide by any of the companyditions which may be imposed by this Court for enlarging him on bail.
ABDUL NAZEER, J. 1 Leave granted.
The case against the appellant is almost similar to that of other companyaccused who have been enlarged on bail.
