The appellant filed a Review Petition before the Tribunal relying on few judgments of this Court as well as judgments of Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No.
The appellant filed O.A. No.
139 of 2009, Lt.
25 of 2013 and the order dated 11.06.2014 rejecting the Review Application No.
Medical Board opined that disability was due to stress and strain of services.
The appellant submits that judgment of Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No.
Signature Not Verified The brief facts of the case are Digitally signed by ASHWANI KUMAR Date 2018.02.16 165457 IST Reason The appellant was companymissioned in the Regiment of Artillery on 24.12.1982.
Release Medical Board held on 31.03.2004, found that the appellant was suffering from primary Hypertension, aggravated due to stress and strain of military service.
R.K. Rai has appeared in person.
In the year 2002, appellant was posted at Zakhama in Nagaland.
The Tribunal relying on the judgment of this Court in Union of India Vs.
P.K. Kapur Retd.
Medical Board was held on 21.01.1988, when he was placed on low medical category.
Medical Re categorization Board held on 20.09.2002 again assessed the medical disability of the appellant as On 06.02.2003, appellant applied for premature retirement.
On 27.09.2000, the Medical Re categorization Board assessed the appellants disability as 50.
Union of India.
We have also heard learned companynsel appearing for the Union of India as well as learned companynsel appearing for the respondent No.5.
Disability was assessed at 30.
In the year 1987, while performing the duty of Observation Post Officer, the appellant fell ill, who was treated in Military Hospital, Devlali.
336 of 2011, Maj.
25 of 2013 in the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Mumbai, where he prayed for following reliefs Relief Sought In view of the facts mentioned in this Original Application, the Applicant most respectfully prays for the following reliefs That the Honble Court be pleased to direct Respondent No.1 to forward medical disability pension claim to Respondent No.2 directing the latter to grant medical disability pension to the Applicant at the earliest.
Appellant was retired on 29.07.2003.
That the Honble Court be pleased to pass necessary direction to Respondent No.2 to release the medical disability pension in respect of the Applicant at the earliest.
Aggrieved against dismissal of his O.A. as well as the Review Petition, the appellant has filed these appeals.
The appellant, Ex.
Ajay Wahi 2010 11 SCC 213 rejected the Review Petition.
ASHOK BHUSHAN, J. These two appeals have been filed by the appellant challenging the orders dated 20.09.2013 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal Regional Bench at Mumbai rejecting Petitioners O.A. No.
The Armed Forces Tribunal vide its judgment dated 20.09.2013 rejected the application.
In the Review Petition, the petitioner relied on the judgment of Principal Bench which held that the cut off date making difference between the personnel, who retired before 01.01.1996 and after 01.01.1996, is discriminatory and arbitrary.
25 of 2013, hence numberone companyld appear on behalf of the respondent No.5 and file the objection.
4 of 2014.
