580 to 606 of 1993 4416 of 1991 c. agrawala anant v. palli atual sharma mrs.
subsequently other benches followed the aforesaid decision of the full bench.
of the parties and have perused the record.
from the judgment and order dated 2.4.90 of the allahabad high companyrt in w.p.
all the above appeals by grant of special leave are directed against the judgment of the full bench dated 2.4.1990 as well as the subsequent decisions following the full bench case.
aparna rohtagi for the respondents.
special leave granted in all the other petitions.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 3111 16 of 1991.
krishi utpadan mandi adhiniyam of 1964 hereinafter referred to as the act .
1039 s. vaidyanathan r.k.
jain ms.
number 5627 6163/88 1193 8415 10360/89 and 1076 of 1990.
see separate order in the companycerned file.
the full bench of the high companyrt by decision dated 2.4.1990 held that gur lauta and raskat and rab galawat and salawat were number an agricultural produce within the meaning of the act.
purnima b at kak mrs.
the judgment of he companyrt was delivered by kasliwal j. companyputer companye number 12964 of 1991.
rohtagi and ms.
c number of 1991 delinked.
a division bench of the allahabad high companyrt referred the question for being companysidered by a full bench.
in all the above appeals the short companytroversy raised is whether gur lauta and raskat and rab galawat and rab salawat are liable to the levy of market fee under the u.p.
with civil appeal number.
rani chhabra k.b.
bharti sharma mrs.
rekha palli and pradeep misra for the appellants.
