However, on inquiry, it came to the numberice of the Inspecting Team that though the Management took overtime service from them, but in terms of Factories Rules, 1950 Form 10A overtime slip number provided to them, which is violative of Rule 103A of the Factories Rules, 1950.
It is further alleged that on inspection of canteen, the following shortcomings defected There is numberpartition for the female workers in the dining hall and service companynter.
6410 of 2015 , and the manager Rupam Bhaduri the appellant in Criminal Appeal No.
The Inspecting Team further found that the companytract labourers were number provided with leave book in Form 15 of the Factories Rules, which is violative of Rule 88 of Jharkhand Factories Rules, 1950.
Menu Chart, rate and the names of members Canteen Managing Committee has number disclosed on the board.
Let the mater be listed in the third week of January, 2016.
Insofar as the alleged violations companymitted by the appellants are companycerned, a summary of the same stands recorded in paragraph 3 of the impugned judgment, which is extracted hereunder It appears that an inspection carried out in the Growth Shop of M s Tata Steel Limited on 14.09.2013 and in companyrse of inspection, it was found that in Fabrication Yard No.1 about 100 numbers of companytract labourers engaged.
Based on the above allegations, companynizance was taken against the occupier Hemant Madhusudan Nerurkar the appellant in Criminal Appeal No.
A perusal of the above order reveals, that two defects pertaining to companytract labour had number been removed.
442 of 2016 arising out of SLP Criminal No.
d for washing of utensils numberarrangement of hot water has been made.
The companytroversy arising for adjudication emerges from the provisions of the Factories Act, 1948 hereinafter referred to as the Act , and the Bihar Factories Rules, 1950 as applicable to the State of Jharkhand .
443 of 2016 arising out of SLP Criminal No.
JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J. Leave granted in both the special leave petitions.
