620 OF 2008 Arising out of SLP Crl.
Learned Magistrate has rejected the appellants prayer for dispensing with her examination under Section 313 Cr.
36 of 2006 by which the order dated 2.2.2006 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate 11th Court, Calcutta in Case No.
P.C. Another petition was filed on 23.8.2005 under Section 205 Cr.
The order was challenged before the High Court, which as numbered above the same was rejected.
C 510 of 2003 was upheld.
P.C. The proceeding was one under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 in short the N I Act .
P.C. Learned Magistrate allowed the petition filed under Section 205 Cr.
P.C. and directed the appellant to be personally present on that date.
The date was adjourned to 12.5.2005.
But the petition under Section 313 1 b Cr.
Recording of evidence was companypleted and 5th May, 2005 was fixed for her examination under Section 313 Cr.
P.C. But on that date she was absent and a prayer was made for adjournment.
P.C. was rejected.
No.1477 of 2008 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Reportable CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
On 31.1.2004 she was examined under Section 251 Cr.
P.C. by examining of the pleader who was to represent her under Section 205 Cr.
Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court dismissing the application filed by the appellant under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in short the Cr.
Challenge in the said application was to the order dated 26.9.2006 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, 7th Fast Track Court, Calcutta in Criminal Revision No.
Appellant appeared before learned Magistrate on 2.6.2003 and was released on bail.
In Bibhuti Bhusan Das Gupta Anr.
P.C. on 2.2.2006 subject to the companydition that the appellant shall appear before the Court as and when called.
It is against this order of learned Magistrate a revision was filed before learned Additional Sessions Judge who companyfirmed the order.
P.C. Since she was absent on 3.7.2004, warrant of arrest was issued against her but on 20.7.2004 she surrendered before learned Magistrate and was released on bail.
On that date appellant filed a petition purported to be under Section 313 1 b of Cr.
