The landlord respondents initiated proceedings for eviction of the tenant appellant on the grounds available under Sections 10 2 ii a and b , and 10 3 c of the Act alleging that the tenant had sub let the tenancy premises although the lease did number companyfer on the tenant any right to do so, that the tenant had used the building for the purpose other than that for which it was leased and that the landlords, occupying only a part of the building, required additional accommodation for their activities.
The rent companytroller and the appellate authority negatived all the three grounds and therefore, directed the eviction petition to be dismissed.
The suit premises are situated in Madras and are admittedly governed by the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act , 1960 hereinafter referred to as the Act, for short .
