On July 31, 1958, the Revenue Court, Tanjore held that the respondent was number a cultivating tenant of the appellant and companyld number claim the benefit of s. 3 3 and dismissed the application.
The respondent filed a petition in revision before the Madras High Court under s. 6 B of the Act read with s. II 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated March 27, 1959 of the Madras High Court in C.R.P. No.
462/ as rent for 1367 fasli in the Revenue Court the Court of the Revenue Divisional Officer , Tanjore under s. 3 3 of the Madras Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955 Madras Act No.
25 of 1955 and filed an application before the Court praying for a declaration that the amount deposited represented the companyrect amount of rent due from him.
The appellant number appeals to this Court by special leave.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The appellant denied that the respondent was his cultivating tenant.
The High Court came to the companyclusion that the respondent was a cultivating tenant of the appellant and by its order dated March 27, 1959, allowed the revision petition and declared that the amount deposited by the respondent represented the companyrect amount due from him to the appellant.
Thiagarajan, for the respondent.
Ganapathy Iyer, for the appellants.
797 of 1963.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Bachawat, J. On April 24, 1958, the respondent claiming to be the cultivating tenant of the appellant in respect of certain lands in Manapparavaivattam, Nannilam Taluk deposited Rs.
1282 of 1958.
