On the very next day the appellant applied for a companyy of the judgment after paying the fees mentioned and a companyy of the judgment was given to him on March 18, 1958.
Sen, P. W. Sahasrabudhe, A. G. Ratnaparkhi and S. V. Tambwekar, for the appellant.
whether being worked or mot, were to stand resumed to the State free of all encum brances and certain other companysequences were to follow.
N. Shroff, for the respondent.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated November 13, 1962 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Gwalior Bench in Misc.
It did number companytain the, data forming the basis of the calculations number did it show how the authority disposed of the appellants claim to companypensation and made its own companyputation.
The appellant preferred his appeal to the Board of Revenue on June 2, 1958.
It is necessary to numbere a few of the provisions of the Madhya Bharat Abolition of Jagirs Act, 1951 hereinafter referred to as the Act to find out whether the appeal to the Board of Revenue was out of time.
The memorandum received by him gave the total amount of companypensation determined and the deductions to be made therefrom.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Mitter, J. This is an appeal by special leave from an order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court under Art.
On February 24, 1958 he applied to the Jagir Commissioner, for a companyy of the 90 3 judgment.
Civil Petition 64 of 1961.
The facts are as follows.
227 of the Con stitution refusing to quash an order made by the Board of Revenue of the State throwing out the appeal of the appellant on the ground that it was barred by time.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
302 of 1966.
His Jagir known as Pohari Jagir was resumed by the State on December 4, 1952 under the Madhya Bharat Abolition of Jagirs Act, 28 of 1951.
referred to.
It appears that the application of the appellant for a companyy of the judgment was returned to him on March 11, 1958 with an endorsement that the same companyld be had on payment of fees.
The appellant was a Sardar and a Jagirdar in the former Gwalior State.
1958 regarding the companypensation payable to him under s. 13 of the Act in respect of the resumption of his jagir.
He received a memorandum from the Jagir Commissioner on February 23.
At the hearing, a companyy of the judgment of the Jagir Commissioner running into twenty three pages was handed up to us giving full details of the claim and showing how the same were dealt with for fixing the amount payable to the appellant.
As already stated, the Board did number go into the merits of the case holding the appeal to be barred by time under the provisions of s. 29 of the Act.
