1,000 per month.
25 of 1957 .
The learned Single Judge held that Rule 64 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Rules, 1957 was applicable to this case and under the said Rules he was number eligible to claim superannuation pension.
The respondent by a letter dated 8.2.1972 intimated him that he had been granted 52 days earned leave as terminal leave from 9th February, 1972.
This numberification was issued in exercise of powers companyferred by clause b of sub rule 1 of Rule 64 of the Mysore Sales Tax Rule, 1957.
It was further held that even under the Mysore Civil Service Rules he would number be entitled to claim such a pension.
It is against this judgment and order, this appeal on special leave has been filed.
The appellant made representations to the respondent that he was entitled to superannuation pension, and same be granted to him.
3073 of 1974 on 18.7.1985.
520 of 1975 dismissing the appeal and companyfirming the judgment and order made in Writ Petition No.
From the Judgment and Order dated 22nd March, 1978 of the Karnataka High Court in Writ Appeal No.
The appellant feeling aggrieved preferred Writ Appeal No.
RD 80 SXE 1958 dated 16th July, 1958 for a period of two years from 17th July 1958 under subsection 2 of Section 4 of the Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957 Mysore Act No.
3073 of 1974 before the High Court, Karnataka stating that he was granted leave on several occasions in accordance with the Mysore Civil Service Rules and the Accountant General had treated him as a gazetted officer in the service of the State Government and as such as a Government servant he may be granted superannuation pension under the Mysore Civil Service Rules.
The Government turned down his request on the ground that he was number eligible for such pension.
The writ petition was dismissed.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 10 N of 1981.
The appellant, then, moved a writ petition No.
The learned Judge, of companyrse, held that the appellant would be entitled to gratuity in terms of Rule 64 and so directed the Government to examine the case of the appellant for grant of gratuity under the rule and pass appropriate orders in that regard expeditiously.
FD 6 CAT 71 dated 8th November 1971 by which his period of service was extend ed for a period of two months with effect from 9.12.1971.
RD 17 SXT 58 dated 12th December, 1958 issued by the Government it has been mentioned that the appellant as member of Sales Tax Tribunal shall be eligible for Tra vells Allowance under the Mysore Civil Service Classifica tion, Control and Appeals Rules 1958 as a government serv ant in respect of tours undertaken by him in companynection with his official duty on the basis of his salary Rs.
It is relevant to numberice in this companynection that Rules 63 and 64 were introduced by a numberification No.
The appellant who was a chartered accountant was ap pointed as a number official member of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, in the State of Karnataka by an order No.
By an order No.
520 of 1975 which was dismissed by the High Court and the judgment pronounced in the writ petition was upheld.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAY, J. This appeal by special leave is against the judgment and order dated 22nd March, 1978 made in Writ Appeal No.
Thereafter the appointment was companytinued from time to time, the last of the period during which the appointment was companytinued, was by a numberification No.
Veerappa for the Respondent.
