The remarks are derogatory and lower the authority of the higher Judiciary.
Hence the name of the petitioner is number to be shown in the cause list.
The names of the Judges, who are allegedly involved in the case, were published.
On 18.11.2008, one Mr. Manoj Kumar Srivastava and Mr. Veer Singh, Advocates practicing in the High Court of Allahabad, filed Miscellaneous Application No.
Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent High Court of Allahabad submits that the petition was placed before a Single Judge of the High Court, and thereafter, before the Chief Justice.
The Outlook Magazine, in its 10.11.2008 edition, published an article authored by the third appellant, which mainly dealt with the infamous Provident Fund Scam.
It was held in the impugned order that The publication dated 10.11.2008 at page 56, 57, 58, 59 as mentioned above has caused great insult to the higher Judiciary.
It appears, for about four years, numberhing happened in the matter until it was listed before the Division Bench of the High Court leading to the impugned order dated 28.04.2015.
KURIAN, J. Leave granted.
What is the period of limitation for suo motu initiation of companytempt proceedings, is the short question for companysideration in this case.
The remarks are derogatory and have lowered the authority of the Higher Judiciary.
According to them, the article has caused great insult to the Higher Judiciary.
