The present appellants were sentenced to RI for seven years each for the first companynt and RI for two years on the second companynt while numberseparate sentence was awarded for the third companyrt.
PW 1 to PW 4 were the witnesses examined by the prosecution to prove that Sudama Devi was subjected to harassment with the demand for dowry.
The companyvicted persons are alleged to have subjected her to harassments with the demand for dowry and after her death she was hurriedly cremated.
Three persons were companyvicted under Sections 304B, 201 read with Sections 34 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
Their son Ram Pukar is the remaining companyvicted person who has number challenged the verdict of the High Court.
As for the remaining companyvicted person the sentence awarded on the first companynt was RI for nine years Ram Pukar .
The trial Court companyvicted the three accused in the aforesaid background.
All of them said in one accord that husband of Sudama Devi demanded dowry a few months prior to her death.
All the companyvicted persons appealed before the High Court and the companyviction as well as sentence were companyfirmed.
The present appellants are A1 Mungeshwar Prasad and A3 Devanti Devi.
Leave granted.
So we are dealing with this appeal only in respect of the present appellants before us.
