This factory was closed according to the agements case, after payment of closure companypensation in terms of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Out of this latter category, one is numbermore and the remaining ten disputed the case of closure and companytended that it was a make believe.
Bishamber Dass 4.
The State Government made a reference of the dispute which thus arose between the workmen and the Management to the Industrial Tribunal.
After having heard companynsel for the appellant at some length, and on certain suggestions made by the Court, the parties have companye to a settlement aided by the statesman like advice of companynsel on both sides.
Against these two directions, the appeal has been filed.
20.000/ on the basis of Rs.
Madan Gopal 3.
2,000/ per worker.
The award of the Tribunal was to the effect that there was numberbona fide closure of the factory and that the workmen were entitled to be reinstated.
Seventeen workmen received the companypensation but eleven did number.
Ujagar Singh 5.
The appellant undertakes to deposit into Court within one month from to day Rs.
On deposit this sum will be withdrawn by the ten workers whose names are as under 1 Ram Chandra 2.
This will be in addition to the payment directed by this Court at the time the special leave was granted.
R. Krishna Iyer.
J. This appeal by special leave is aimed at the validity of an award dated January 23, 1970 made by the Industrial Tribunal II at Lucknow According to the Management it had two factories one at Calcutta and the other at Kanpur.
The subject matter of this appeal relates to the Kanpur factory which had on its muster rolls twenty eight workmen.
