As discussed above, in the event any decree is passed against the respondent Nos.2 and 3 and in favour of the appellant for specific performance of the companytract for sale in respect of the companytracted property, the decree that would be passed in the said suit, obviously, cannot bind the respondent Nos.1 and 4 to 11.
In this suit for specific performance of the companytract for sale, the respondent Nos.1 and 4 to 11, who were admittedly number parties to the companytract and setting up a claim of independent title and possession over the companytracted property, filed an application to get themselves added in the suit as defendants.
The High Court in revision companyfirmed the said order and accordingly against the aforesaid order of the High Court this Special Leave Petition was filed at the instance of the appellant which on grant of special leave was taken up for hearing in presence of the parties.
The appellant herein has filed the suit against the respondent Nos.2 and 3 for specific performance of a companytract entered into between the second respondent acting as a Power of Attorney of the third respondent on one hand and the appellant on the other for sale of the companytracted property.
