Rajaram was having farsa whereas Hakim was armed with an iron rod and Udaibhan with lathi.
Udaibhan gave more than one lathi blows.
By the impugned judgment and order the High Court has partly allowed criminal appeals preferred by the three accused, namely, Rajaram, Udaibhan and Hakim Singh, respondents in these appeals so as to companyvert their companyviction under Section 307 of IPC for Rajaram and under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the IPC for the other two appellants into one under Section 326 for Rajaram and 326/34 for the other two.
Rajaram caused a farsa injury on the head, Hakim caused an injury with iron bar on the eyebrow near the right eye.
SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J. These appeals by special leave have been preferred by State of Madhya Pradesh against companymon judgment and order dated 14.12.2011 passed in Criminal Appeal Nos.92/2002 and 106/2002.
