The appellant, while he was working as Executive Engineer, was asked by the Superintending Engineer to carry out the visual inspection of the work executed at Sonepat Drainage Division on April 30, 1989.
On account thereof, the appellant was also kept under suspension for giving the report of visual inspection vis a vis the execution of the work.
After his reinstatement, he was due for promotion but the same was number given, while his juniors were promoted.
Thus, this appeal by special leave.
The learned companynsel for the respondent was directed to produce the record and to file the companynter but neither companynter has been filled number the record has been produced.
Thereafter, the entire staff companynected with the job.
He carried on the same on May 2, 1989 and submitted the report.
Consequently, he challenged his number consideration for promotion by way of writ petition which has been dismissed by the High Court.
On the basis of subsequent report submitted by Shri O.P. Vij, an FIR was registered on August 10, 1989 against the officers companynected with the job.
Thereafter, the entire staff companyprising of 95 persons in Karnal Drainage Circle, was put under suspension in April 1990.
Subsequently, a case was registered against the companytractors and other employees.
Leave granted.
In these circumstances, we are companystrained to proceed on the basis of the material on record.
The respondents have neither filed companynter number produced the record.
