On October 15, Head Constable Ajit Singh, informed Raol that some unknown person had companye to the shop of Umarbhai jeweller with a large quantity of gold.
Accordingly the police visited the shop of the jeweller and his brother also a jeweller and came to know that gold had been given to him by the appellant to be melted.
The appellant was also detained under the Public Securities Act but was released.
On being questioned he stated that his family was the original inhabitant of Jamnagar State but for the last 60 years they were doing the business of companytractors for purchasing and selling land in Durban.
Appeal by special leave from the Judgment and Order, dated 26th June, 1950, of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dixit and Chainani JJ.
His brother Daud Issa was, however, serving in Bombay.
Ultimately on January 2, 1948, he along with others was prosecuted on the companyplaint of Raol for an offence under section 61 E of the Bombay District Police Act IV of 1890 read with section 109 of the Indian Penal Code.
The car was thoroughly examined but numberhing incriminating was found.
This gold along with some other gold kept at another place was seized by the police.
The entire quantity of gold seized was 27731 tolas the value of which is roughly estimated at Rs.
C. Chatterjee H. J. Umrigar and S. P. Varma, with him for the appellant.
Proceedings under action 20 of the Indian Telegraph Act were instituted against the appellant and others on the assumption that the wireless set in the car was a transmitter but they were dropped when it was found otherwise.
The police also took possession of the car.
C. Setalvad, Attorney General for India Porus A. Mehta, with him for the respondent.
3 lakhs.
From Mombasa they took a boat on August 30, and reached Colombo on September 1 1.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by GULAM HASAN J. This appeal is brought by special leave from the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dixit and Chainani JJ. ,
The appellants ordered to appear before the Sub Inspector on October 12.
67 of 1951.
He was accompanied by, Daud Hassam another brother in law and both travelled to Mombasa by car.
March 11.
They flew from Colombo to Madras on September 14, but shipped the car by a steamer.
in Criminal Appeal No.
784 of 1949.
The appellant, Suleman Issa, who is an inhabitant of Natal in South Africa left Durban in August, 1947, by car for India to pay a visit to his native place Sarsa in District Kaira where his sister was living with her husband Alimahmad Issak.
dated June 26, 1950, whereby the High Court allowed the appeal of the State of Bombay, setting aside the order of acquittal of the appellant passed by the Sessions Judge of Kaira, dated May 7, 1949, and restoring the order of companyviction and sentence of the appellant passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Nadiad Prant, dated December 31, 1948.
He gave details of the journey performed by him and his companypanion and produced passports, as also the receipts for paying custom duty and the deposit.
