In the second appeal filed by the respondent, at the time of its admission, the High Court was of the view that two substantial questions of law arise therein and, accordingly, framed the same, which reads thus 1 Whether the plaintiff can be termed as the purchaser of equity of redemption from Sankaran Velayudhan to enable him to redeem the property?
A 1 and A 3 by obtaining Ex.
and 2 Whether the Courts below erred in holding that the plaintiff is in the position of sub mortgagor having regard to the fact that the first defendant having already obtained the main mortgage rights extinguished the sub mortgages, Exs.
Heard learned companynsel for the parties.
