The second writ petition was disposed of by an order dated 20.8.2002 by the High Court, holding that the appellant was number entitled to alternative land.
The appellant claims to be the owner of land bearing Gat No.24 admeasuring 1 hectare 8 ares situated at village Nanvij, Taluka Daud, District Pune.
The said petition was disposed of by order dated 18.12.2000 by directing the second respondent to either allot a suitable alternative land to the appellant within three months or declare an award for companypensation for acquisition of land within six months.
The Appellant however thereafter made an application dated 9.2.2001 to second Respondent to allot Gat No.197, Mauje Daund instead of the land earlier suggested.
The orders dated 20.8.2002 and 23.2.2004 are challenged in these appeals by special leave.
The civil application which was in the nature of a petition for review of the order dated 20.8.2002, was rejected by order dated 23.2.2004.
It however directed the respondents to declare the award and pay the companypensation in regard to the submerged land.
This companytention has been expressly companysidered and rejected by the High Court.
The appellant again approached the High Court by filing another Writ Petition No.4021 of 2002 seeking a direction to respondents to forthwith allot Gat No.197 measuring 5 acres situated at Mauje Daund, Taluka Daund, District Pune, which he had identified as available alternative land and also pay Rs.32500/ as crop companypensation.
Thereafter, the appellant filed Civil Application No.2094 of 2003 reiterating his prayer for allotment of the said five acres of land.
The said land was submerged in water on companystruction of K.T. Weir at Sonawadi area and his standing crop was destroyed.
As numbercompensation was paid and as he was number rehabilitated, he filed Writ Petition No.4090 of 2000 seeking a direction for allotment of an alternative land Survey No.50/1, Mauje and for payment of companypensation for loss of standing crop.
