The learned Subordinate Judge increased the estimated yield from the companyonut and orange trees as well as the price of the yield but capitalized the net income at 20 years purchase.
Dissatisfied with the award he respondent moved for reference under s. 18 of the Land Acquisition Act and the case was referred to the Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli.
63 of 1959, while the respondent filed A.S. No.
63 and 78 of 1959.
The numberification under s. 4 1 of the Land Acquisition Act was published on March 7, 1956.
78 of 1959 claiming a further enhancement.
From the Judgment and Decree dated the 10th April, 1962 of the High Court of Madras in Appeal Suit Nos.
28,572 15 6 inclusive of solarium.
1468 69 of 1967.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeals Nos.
The appellant, the Government of Madras, acquired 9 acres and 86 cents of land in Tirunelveli District as it was needed for reserve area in Block III of Manimuthar Project.
M. Tarkunde and Naui it Lal, for the respondent.
V. Rangam and A. Subhashini, for the appellant.
63 and 78 of 1959 dated April 10, 1962.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MATHEW, J. These two appeals, by certificate, are directed against the judgment and decree of the High Court of Madras in A.S. Nos.
Against this decision, the State of Madras filed S. No.
The method adopted by him for valuing companyonut and orange lopes was to capitalize the net income from these lopes at 20 years purchase.
