PW1 was the victim.
The trial companyrt numbericed that it was the accused Chandan who companymitted rape on her.
Kamla.
There was numberallegation of rape against the other accused persons namely Hemraj and Smt.
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench dismissing the application for grant of leave to question companyrectness of the judgment of learned Additional District Sessions Judge Fast track , No.2 Alwar.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows Respondents were facing the trial for alleged companymission of offence punishable under Section 342 and 376 2 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in short the IPC .
