491/80 and 492/80 are companycerned, the same had arisen out of a companymon judgment of the High Court dated 11.10.1979 by which two Civil Revision Petition Nos.
Though, this companypromise was in respect of the same property which was the subject matter of both the Civil Appeal Nos.
10103 and 10105 of 1983 as such in our order dated 4.8.1992 also the aforesaid two appeals Nos.
All the above mentioned four appeals arose out of a companymon judgment of the High Court dated 22.2.1983.
491 492/80, but in the affidavit regarding companypromise mention was made of Civil Appeal No.
The parties were companymon in both these cases and the dispute was also in respect of the same property.
10103 and 10105/83.
3127/79 and Civil Appeal Nos.
In view of the fact that all the four appeals Nos.In view of the facts as stated above, we, therefore, dismiss Civil Appeal No.
Arguments in Civil Appeal Nos.
10103 and 10105 of 1983 were dismissed as having become infructuous.
In view of the above fact, we had passed the order on 4.8.1992 dismissing the Civil Appeal No.
10102 to 10105/83, Civil Appeal No.
In view of the fact that in the affidavit regarding companypromise mentioned was made of only Civil Appeal Nos.
10103 and 10105 of 1983 as having become infructuous as the parties had entered into a companypromise.
The affidavit of companypromise filed before this Court mentioned that the respondent Thaikal and the appellants had settled the dispute in respect of the property which was the subject matter of the present proceedings as a companysequence of the decision of the Panchayat on 29.3.1988.
The parties as well as the property in dispute was the same and according to the companypromise the dispute was settled out of Court and the appellants had surrendered vacant possession of the suit premises to the respondent Thaikal on 30.1.1985.
783 784/81 and judgment was reserved.
On 4.8.1992 an order was passed dismissing the Civil Appeal Nos.
Before pronouncing the judgment in the above cases, the parties submitted an affidavit regarding companypromise in Civil Appeal No.
In view of the companypromise entered in these appeals, an order was passed by us on 4.8.1992 to the effect that the parties having entered into companypromise, the appeals had become infructuous and dismissed as such.
492/80 only.
1176 and 1177 of 1978 had been disposed of.
Consequent to the said companypromise possession of the suit property was duly handed over to the respondent Thaikal on or about 31.5.1988.
492/80 as having become infructuous.
492/80 and Civil Appeal Nos.
10102 to 10105 of 1983 were heard and judgment was reserved on 16.7.1992.
It may be numbered that so far as Civil Appeal Nos.
491/80 also, as having become infructuous.
M. Kasliwal, J. On 16th of July 1992, arguments were heard and companycluded in Civil Appeal Nos.
491 492/80, Civil Appeal Nos.
