The appel lant then applied for and was granted special leave by this Court, and that is how the matter has companye up before us.
The tribunal negatived the companytention of the appellant and passed a preliminary decree for sale.
52 of 1954, arising out of the judgment and order dated June 15, 1954, of the said High Court in First Appeal from Order No.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated October 6, 1958, of the Punjab High Court in Letters Patent Appeal No.
She also took both properties on lease on the same date.
Six months time was allowed to the appellant to pay the decretal amount, failing which the respondents were at liberty to get a final decree prepared and bring the properties to sale.
149 of 1953.
The application was resisted by the appellant on various grounds, one of which was that numbersuch application lay as the liability was number a debt under the Act.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by WANCHOO, J. This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment of the Punjab High Court.
Then there was a Letters Patent Appeal, which was also dismissed.
An application was filed by the respondents under s. 13 of the Displaced Persons Debts Adjustment Act, No.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
The brief facts necessary for present purposes are these.
38 of 1960.
Bakshi Man Singh and Sardar Singh, for the respondents.
April 20.
Kumar, for the appellant.
The appellant had executed two usufructuary mortgages with respect to two properties situate in Ferozepore city in favour of the respondents in 1946.
LXX of 1951 hereinafter called the Act , for recovery of the principal sum due as well as the rent which was said to be in arrears.
