Hence the appellant has preferred this appeal by obtaining special leave.
The appellant moved the High Court of Bombay for relief with writ petition No.
The Tribunal by its order dated January 19, 1987 dismissed the petition.
The Tribunal after companysidering the material on record was of opinion that there is numberproof that the appellant had received the government letter companytaining companyfidential remarks.
656 of 1986.
Upon Constitution of the Central Administrative Tribunal, the writ petition stood transferred to the Tribunal.
In January 1986, the State Government of Maharashtra gave senior time scale to his juniors while denying the same to him.
It is number disputed that the companyfidential report was number sent to the appellant by registered post number there is any evidence to indicate that it was received by the appellant.
Before the Tribunal, various and varied companytentions were raised.
Jagannatha Shetty, J. Vijay Kumar, appellant, is an IAS Officer in the cadre of the Maharashtra Government.
