We have also perused the evidence of P.Ws 1 to 3 and the record pertaining to the identification proceedings.
The A.S.I, reached the scene of occurrence and found the deceased dead.
The accused pleaded number guilty and set up a defence that he was falsely implicated because of the enmity at the instance of P.W 17.
The prosecution case is that on 18.4.1978 at about 9 p.m. the accused entered the hotel of P.W. 1 and made some ghalata.
Doctor found seven incised wounds.
P.Ws 1 to 3 participated in identification parade and identified the accused as the assailant.
An inquest was held and the dead body was sent for post mortem.
2 an oblique incised wound in front of left shoulder passing through the anterior auxiliary wall to the arm pit was the fatal injury and was sufficient in the ordinary companyrse of nature to cause death.
This part of the evidence has been believed by both the Courts.
The deceased obviously asked him number to make ghalata and a quarrel ensued.
The information was sent to the police and P.W. 1 gave a companyplaint on the basis of which the F.I.R. was registered.
Thereupon, the accused, who was armed with a knife stabbed the deceased several times and the deceased raised hue and cry.
The doctor opined that Injury No.
