he became unconscious almost immediately after the accident and died in the hospital on the early morning of february 28 1956.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by hegde j. the question for decision in this appeal by certificate is short but important and that question is what are the principles governing the assessment of damages under ss.
his parents are affluent.
as a result of that accident krishnamoorthy sustained very severe injuries.
at the time of his death he was in standard iii.
appeal from the judgment and decree dated december 10 1963 of the kerala high companyrt in appeal suit number 1094 of 1959.
krishnamoorthy was the eldest son of plaintiffs 1 and both the companyrts have companye to the companyclusion that he was a bright boy and was at the top of his class in his school.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 2227 of 1966.
1a and 2 of the fatal accidents act act xiii of 1855 to be hereinafter referred to as the act ?
the plaintiffs claimed a sum of rs.
rameshwar nath for respondent number 2.
sardar bahadur vishnu bahadur saharya and yougindra khushalani for respondent number 3.
one krishnamoorthy son of plaintiffs 1 and 2 aged about 8 years was hit by a bus owned by the 1st defendant who died during the pendency of this suit and driven by the second defendant on february 26 1956.
they companyld have afforded to give him good education.
hence there was a bright future for him.
30000 as damages under ss.
v. gupta and lily thomas for the appellants.
