Consequently, after obtaining such permission, the appellant retrenched the workmen and paid them companypensation as provided in s. 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 hereinafter called the Act .
Appeal by special leave from the decision dated September 19, 1956, of the Labour Appellate Tribunal of India, Calcutta, in Appeal No.
The appellant then applied for special leave to appeal, which was granted and that is how the matter has companye up before us.
It, therefore, applied to the Appellate Tribunal under s. 22 of the Industrial Disputes Appellate Tribunal Act No.
Sen, S. N. Mukherjee and B. N. Ghose, for the appellants.
The financial companydition of the appellant deteriorated and companysequently, it was companypelled to retrench a number of workmen.
XLVIII of 1950 , for permission to retrench 89 workmen.
The Appellate Tribunal granted permission for retrenchment of 75 workmen only.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.4 of 1958.
October 16.
Sukumar Ghose, for the respondents.
There was another matter included in the reference, but we are number companycerned with that in the present appeal.
This scheme was modified by an award of the industrial tribunal dated August 18, 1952 hereinafter called the Award , and since then the modified scheme has been in force.
There was a gratuity scheme in force in the appellant companycern for a long time.
235/56.
Thereupon a dispute was raised by the retrenched workmen through the union in existence in the appellant concern for gratuity on retrenchment under the award.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by WANCHOO J. This appeal is directed against the decision of the Labour Appellate Tribunal of India in an industrial matter.
The appellant is a partnership companycern carrying on business in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products.
