The respondents filed a revision petition which was heard by the learned Assistant Judge who reversed the findings of the trial companyrt and held that numbercase was made out for companydoning the delay.
This decree was finally companyfirmally by the order of this Court when petition for special leave to appeal filed by the appellants tenants was dismissed by this Court.
Against this order, a revision petition was preferred which was heard by he learned Assistant Judge.
Respondents obtained a decree for possession against the appellants in Regular Civil Suit No.
After an unsuccessful revision petition to the High Court, the appellants filed this appeal by special leave.
Special leave granted.
146 of 1964 on the ground that the respondents bonafied required the suit premises for their personal use and occupation.
