The second appeal and two miscellaneous petitions were disposed of by a companymon judgment which form matrix of the present appeals.
Respondent Bahadur Ram filed a suit for specific performance against 9 defendants.
The suit was decreed by the trial Court.
However, the same was upset by learned Additional District Judge, Kurukshetra .
Though various points were urged by learned companynsel for the appellant it is number necessary to go into those aspects in view of the limited scope of the present appeals in view of the numberice issued.
By the impugned judgment the trial Courts judgment and decree have been restored and that of the first Appellate Court was reversed.
Arising out of SLP Nos.
Bahadur Ram filed Second Appeal No.594/1995 against the judgment of learned Additional District Judge.
22808 22810/2002 ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
As the only point on which numberice was issued related to the desirability of disposing of the Second Appeal in terms of Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in short the Code without formulating the substantial question of law by the High Court, it is number necessary to deal with the factual aspects in detail.
