1 in C. A. No.
471 and Respondent No.
Appeals by Special Leave from the Award dated the 22nd December, 1959, of the Industrial Tribunal, Bombay, in Reference I.T. No.
1 of 1960 .
These demands were companysidered by the Industrial Tribunal in the light of the evidence adduced before it by the respective parties and decided on the merits.
L. Dudhia and K. L. Hathi, for the Respondents In C. No.
The two demands set out above were disputed by the companypany.
3 the workmen claimed that for the work done on Sundays and holidays observed by the companypany cleri cal as well as service staff shall be paid twice the employees numbermal rate of pay companysisting of basic salary, dearness allowance and other allowances if any.
571 of 60 and Appellants in C. A. No.
Demand No.
November 14.
The companypany is an All India companycern and has its branches at several places in India.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
Civil Appeals Nos.
5 made by the workmen was that all employees of the companypany shall number be companypulsorily retired by the companypany before they attain the age of 60 except in case of voluntary retirement by the employees companycerned.
472 of 60 .
At its Bombay office 1,400 employees are engaged by the companypany out of these 800 employees are companycerned with the present dispute 600 out of them belong to the clerical cadre whereas the remaining 200 belong to the cadre of the subordinate staff.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by GAJENDRAGADKAR J. These two cross appeals are directed against the decision of the Industrial Tribunal in respect of two of the demands referred to it for adjudication.
Five industrial demands were made against the Imperial Chemical Industries India Private Limited, Bombay hereafter called the companypany , by its workmen hereafter called the workmen , and they were referred for industrial adjudication by the Government of Bombay under s. 10 1 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 XIV of 1947 .
471 and 472 of 1960.
471 of 1960 filed by the companypany is companycerned only with the fixation of the age of retirement, whereas Civil Appeal No.
Thus Civil Appeal No.
By demand No.
3 and 5.
Two of the demands which are the subject matter of the present appeals were demands Nos.
of 1959 .
472 of 1960 which has been filed by the workmen is companycerned with the age of retirement as well as the direction issued by the Tribunal in regard to the payment of allowance to the workmen for work done on festival holidays.
C. Setalvad, Attorney General for India, S. N. Andley, B. Dadachanji, Rameshwar Nath and P. L. Vohra, for the Appellant In C.A. No.
