251 of 2009 and the amount should be kept invested in a FD in a Nationalized Bank.
98 lacs which is paid by respondent No.1 and the appellant and stayed the impugned orders in the said appeals until further orders.
Aggrieved by the order dated 22.04.2010, the appellant and respondent No.2 preferred separate special leave petitions before this Court.
98 lacs which had been paid by the appellant and respondent No.1 as directed by the High Court.
703 in A Wing to the applicant therein i.e. Vasanti Bhat.
The High Court further directed that the amount which was deposited by respondent No.2 shall be transferred to the credit of Suit No.
During the pendency of the appeals before the High Court, respondent No.2 deposited the entire sum of Rs.
This Court, by order dated 23.07.2010 disposed of the aforesaid petitions and asked the parties to raise all objections before the High Court with a request to companysider and dispose of the same at an early date.
Against the order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court, the appellant has filed this appeal by way of special leave before this Court.
703 in A wing supported the companyclusion arrived at by the learned single Judge and argued that the Division Bench companymitted an error in allowing the appeal of the plaintiff by rejecting the Notice of Motion filed by the appellant herein.
The High Court, by impugned orders dated 29.09.2011, allowed the appeals filed by the respondents and set aside the order dated 18.03.2010 passed in Notice of Motions in the respective suits.
The Division Bench of the High Court, vide order dated 22.04.2010, while admitting the appeals directed respondent No.2 to deposit Rs.
Similar such orders were passed on the other Notice of Motions.
Sathasivam, J. Leave granted.
These appeals are directed against the final judgments and orders dated 29.09.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Appeal No.
Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the order dated 18.03.2010 passed by the single Judge of the High Court, respondent No.1 filed four appeals before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court.
