There was numberreason for PWs.
1 and 2 who have said that when they heard shouts they came out of the nearby garage where they were working and saw the two accused running away from the place of the incident.
Both the witnesses have stated that they knew the accused and the deceased since before the incident.
P8 was recorded by a Judicial Magistrate.
The High Court companysidered each one of those reasons and pointed out that numbere was good enough to sustain the findings.
P1, P15 and P8 of Kittu Muthu Krishnan.
Against the order of acquittal, a revision application was also filed by the brother of the deceased.
Pandey has number challenged his companyviction.
It gave 11 reasons in support of its findings.
1 and 2 and the three dying declarations Exhs.
1 and 2 and also the dying declarations.
1 and 2 to falsely depose against the accused.
In order to prove its case, the prosecution had mainly relied upon the evidence of P.Ws.
At about 4.30 a.m., Inspector Incharge had taken further statement of the deceased and at 6.45 a.m. his dying declarations was recorded by the Judicial Magistrate.
They had chased the accused but when they were shown a knife by one of them, they did number pursue them further, returned to the place of the incident and took the injured to the Police Station.
The trial companyrt did number believe the evidence of PWs.
95/76.
This appeal is filed by Sudali Madasamy only.
The dying declaration Ex.
Thus, within a short time, the deceased had disclosed the names of his assailants.
The dying declarations also receive companyroboration from the evidence of PWs.
The companyrt of Sessions, Madurai, acquitted both the accused.
It is number possible to accept the companytention of the appellant that as his relations with the deceased were number good, the deceased had falsely involved him because the deceased would number have liked to do so and allow the real culprits to go set free.
Nanavati, J. The appellant was tried along with Pandey Ram Krishnan for companymitting murder of Kittu Muthu Krishnan in Sessions Case No.
