The appellant again preferred another application for obtaining anticipatory bail.
As per the said report the appellant is diagnosed case of Lumbar Canal Stenosis with severe Lumber Sodalities of L2 3 4 and L5S1.
The appellant had approached the High Court for anticipatory bail but the same was disposed of as withdrawn by an order dated January 22, 2004.
For the foregoing reasons, the appeal succeeds.
The appellant is enlarged on anticipatory bail with reference to Crime Case No.
1681 of 2002, registered with Navrangpura Police Station, Ahmedabad, for alleged companymission of offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420, 439, 471, 473 a and 120B of IPC read with Section 46 of the Banking Regulation Act, is refused.
According to the said report he has severe Osteoarthritis below knee and deformities at knee.
The record shows that in the year 2002 an FIR was lodged against the appellant and 13 other company accused for alleged companymission of offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420, 439, 471, 473 a , 120B of IPC and Section 46 of the Banking Regulation Act.
The High Court rejected the same on the ground that though the previous application for anticipatory bail was disposed of on January 22, 2004, the appellant had neither surrendered before the Investigating Officer number extended companyperation in the investigation, as a result of which the investigating agency had initiated proceedings against the appellant under Section 70 and 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
The appellant shall make himself available for interrogation by police officer as and when required.
1681 of 2002 registered with Navrangpura Police Station at Ahmedabad for the companymission of offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420, 439, 471, 473 a , 120B of IPC and Section 46 of the Banking Regulation Act on his depositing a sum of Rs.40 lacs with the respondent No.
M. PANCHAL, J. Leave granted.
According to the High Court the appellant had numberregard for law and, therefore, his prayer for anticipatory bail was liable to be rejected though he had pleaded his illness.
The instant appeal is directed against judgment dated August 10, 2007 rendered by the learned single Judge of High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.
6590 of 2007 by which the prayer made by the appellant to enlarge him on anticipatory bail with reference to Crime Case No.
