3780 dated the 30th December, 1953, the Board desires that you should inform Shri Parshotam Lal Dhingra that his reversion for generally unsatisfactory work will stand, but that this reversion will number be a bar to his being companysidered again for a promotion in the future if his work and companyduct justify.
As a result of selection, he was promoted as Section Controller in 1942 and as Deputy Chief Controller in 1947 and as the Chief Controller in 1950.
made certain adverse remarks against the appellant in his companyfidential report for the year ending March 31, 1953.
14 1957 611C.W.N. 815.
This was companymunicated to the petitioner on February 17, 1955.
All these posts were in Class III service.
In the meantime the petitioner had on February 9, 1955, filed his writ petition under Art.
28 of 1955, arising out of the judgment and order dated April 15, 1955, of the Single Judge, of the Circuit Bench of the Punjab High Court in Civil Writ No.
On March 31, 1951, seven candidates, including the appellant, appeared before a selection board companystituted for selecting a candidate for the post of Assistant Superintendent Railway Telegraphs, which was a gazetted post in Class 11 Officers cadre.
Appeal from the judgment and order dated January 1, 1956, of the Punjab High Court Circuit Bench at Delhi in Letters Patent Appeal No.
He should also be informed that he has, in his representation, used language unbecoming of a senior official, and that he should desist from this in future.
940 E/14 E.I.A. was issued by the General Manager P to the following effect Shri Bishambar Nath Chopra, Instructor Railway Training School, Saharnpur, is transferred to Headquarters office and appointed to officiate in Class 11 service as Assistant Signal and Tele communication Engineer Telegraphs vice Shri Parshotam Lal Dhingra, who on relief reverts to Class III appointment.
The appellant was selected out of the seven candidates for this post.
L.R. 58 Bom.
36 D of 1955.
The judgment of S. R. Das C. J., Venkatarama Aiyar, S. K. Das and A. K. Sarkar JJ.
It is directed against the judgment and order passed by a Division Bench of that companyrt on January 19, 1956, in Letters Patent Appeal No.
65 of 1957.
You may watch his work up to the end of March, 1955 and judging from his work and companyduct, you may treat him as eligible for being companysidered for promotion as Assistant Transportation Superintendent in the Selection that may be made after March 1955.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
N. Grover and P. S. Safeer, for the appellant.
Ganapathy lyer and R. H. Dhebar, for the Respondent.
Telegraphs, Headquarters Office vice Mr. Sahu Ram whose term of temporary re employment expires on the afternoon of 3rd July, 1951 .
It appears that on April 28, 1953, one Gouri Shankar S.T.E.I. Hd.
On July 2, 1951, a numberice of appointment was issued from the headquarters of the East Punjab Railway, Delhi, numberifying that Mr. Parshotam Lal, Officiating Chief Controller, is appointed to officiate in Class II service as Asstt.
November 1.
The applicant actually relieved Mr. Sahu Ram in the afternoon of July 3, 1951.
The facts are shortly as follows In August 1924 the appellant joined the railway service as a Signaller Telegraphist .
This companyfidential report came before Shri Sen, C.S.T.E., on May 25,1953, who companyfirmed the views expressed by Shri Gouri Shankar and added his own opinion which was also adverse to the appellant.
13 1955 59 C.W.N. 859.
10 A.I.R. 1957 Raj.
DAS C. J. This appeal has been filed with a certificate of fitness granted by the Punjab High companyrt on August 20.
36 D of 1955 and set aside the order passed by the General Manager, Northern Railway on August 19, 1953, reverting the petitioner from the post of Signal and Tele communication Engineer, Telegraphs in Class II service where the appellant was officiating to his substantive post in Class III service.
I am disappointed to read these reports On July 24, 1953, the appellant, who had by this time earned two increments on July 4, 1952 and July 4, 1953, made a representation against the remarks made against him.
Frank Anthony and C. P. Aggarwala, for the intervener.
According to the usual practice obtaining in the office the aforesaid remarks were placed before the General Manager, Shri Karnail Singh, who on June 11, 1953, remarked thereon as follows I am disappointed to read these reports.
A.I.R. 1957 J. K. xi.
was delivered by S. R. Das C. J. Bose J. delivered a separate judgment.
28 of 1955, reversing the judgment and order of Mr. Justice Harnam Singh pronounced on April 15, 1955, whereby his Lordship had allowed the appellants application being Civil Writ No.
The adverse remarks against the appellant in the companyfidential report for the year ending March 31, 1953, which were companymunicated to the appellant for his information by a companyfidential letter No.
The appellant on August 20, 1953, appealed to the General Manager for reconsideration and thereafter on October 19, 1953, appealed to the Railway Board and made a representation also to the President of India.
On February 2, 1955, the Railway Board wrote to the General Manager as follows With reference to your letter No.
