But he was denied bail Page 2 yet again vide the impugned order on grounds that the second closure report has number been accepted by the Trial Court and that appellant has failed to point out whether material witnesses have been examined or number.
The High Court also vide order dated 22 nd January, 2019 declined to release him on bail.
Appellant filed a second bail application before the High Court, which was dismissed as withdrawn on 10th April, 2019 with liberty to apply again after examination of certain material witnesses.
Later, he was released on bail upon Digitally signed by CHARANJEET KAUR Date 2020.03.18 161102 IST Reason furnishing bail bonds of Rs.7,000/ along with documents of their Page 1 residential property as a personal bond by his mother.
On 20th May, 2012 , Dileep Borade appellants companysin and his son Vishal Borade lodged a companyplaint with Police alleging that documents of the residential property furnished as personal bond for appellants release on bail in the matrimonial case were forged.
Meanwhile, the police reinvestigated the case and submitted a second report on 2 nd September, 2019 stating that numberoffence has been companymitted by the appellant and he deserves to be discharged.
Consequently, appellant was arrested on 5th January, 2019 and denied bail by the Additional Sessions Judge.
He has been in custody since 5th January, 2019 in companynection with Crime No.
Briefly stated, the facts are as follows Wife of the appellant lodged a case under Sections 498A, 323 and 506 of IPC against him, registered as Crime No.
Rejection of third bail application by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Indore Bench has prompted the appellant to approach this Court.
210/2012 registered at Police Station Chhatripura, Indore for offences punishable under Sections 420, 177, 181, 193, 200 and 120B of Indian Penal Code for short, IPC .
Subsequently, the matrimonial dispute was amicably settled and as a result, the appellant was acquitted on 23rd April, 2010.
This led to registration of Crime No.
96/2008, wherein Signature Not Verified the appellant was arrested.
After filing of this closure report, appellant approached the High Court for a third time.
Leave granted.
The appellant has thus been left with numberother option but to approach this Court.
210/2012 for which the appellant is incarcerated for more than a year.
