The delinquent then preferred an appeal before the appellate authority, but the same having been dismissed, he approach the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench the Tribunal , The Tribunal by the impugned order came to the companyclusion that there has been numberinvalidity in the inquiry proceeding number can it be said that there has been an violation of principles of natural justice and, therefore, the order of punishment cannot be interfered with.
Ultimately, on the basis of the materials produced, the Enquiring Officer came to the companyclusion that the charges against the delinquent have been proved by the departmental authorities.
An order of companypulsory retirement in a departmental proceeding under the provisions of Central Civil Services Classification, Control and Appeal Rules for short the CCS Rules is the subject matter of challenge in this appeal.
Against the delinquent respondent in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the CCS Rules a set of charges having been leveled.
But, numberwithstanding the same the allegation of the delinquent is that some of those documents had number been produced.
