The appellant took the suit premises viz.
The Appellate Authority and the High Court companyfirmed the order of eviction.
bona fide requirement of the premises by the respondent for business purposes and secondly claim of permanent tenancy rights without bona fides by the tenant.
The Rent Controller ordered eviction On two grounds viz.
In 1975 the respondent filed a petition for eviction of the appellant on three grounds.
The appellant produced additional evidence Exhibit R 1 Sale Deed and Exhibit R 2 Plan before the Appellate Authority to re enforce his companytention that the respondent was owning a house with four malgis in it from 1970 and as such she is number entitled to seek his eviction under Section 10 3 a iii of the Act.
200 for a period of three years.
a malgi shop on lease on 21.3.72 from one Jameelunnisa Begum on a monthly rent of Rs.
On 6.11.1974 the respondent purchased the suit premises from the said Jameelunnisa Begum and had the tenancy attorned in her favour.
Natarajan, J. This appeal by special leave is by a tenant to challenge an order of eviction passed against him under Section 10 2 vi and Section 10 3 a iii of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings Lease, Rent Eviction Control Act, 1960 hereinafter the Act by the Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad and companyfirmed by the Appellate Authority and also by the High Court in revision proceedings.
