We recommend to the Department of Personnel and Training of the Government of India to try and make life after retirement easier for a government servant by having appropriate legislation enacted by Parliament or applicable Pension Rules rather than a khichdi of Instructions, Office Memoranda, Clarifications, Corrigenda and so on and so forth.
The reference was answered accordingly.
13207 of 2013 in the Madras High Court.
By the impugned judgment and order dated 2 nd August, 2016 the High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed the order passed by the Tribunal.
5456 of 2018 Page 1 of 8 and his pension woes are being decided after 27 years and unfortunately number in his favour.
It was held that the pension of the respondent companyld number be on par with the pay scale of a Junior Engineer Grade II.
While companying to this companyclusion the Tribunal adverted to 20 or more decisions rendered by various Benches of the Tribunal, several High Courts and also few decisions of this Court.
XIV Moo, I.A.605 A. No.of 2018 Arising out of S.L.P. C No.
When the respondent retired as a Train Examiner with the Indian Railways, he was in the pay scale of Rs.
Madan B. Lokur, J. Leave granted.
After the 5 th Central Pay Commission was implemented, the replacement scale for the post of Train Examiner which was apparently abolished became Rs.4500 7000.
14002300.
Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and order of the Tribunal, the petitioner preferred W.P. No.
More than 140 years ago, it was said by the Privy Council These proceedings certainly illustrate what was said by Mr. Doyne, and what has been often stated before, that the difficulties of a litigant in India begin when he has obtained a Decree.1 A somewhat similar fate seems to await government servants on getting retired, they have to struggle for the due pension.
This is a classic case of a railway employee who retired as a Train Examiner on 31 st March, 1991 Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by MEENAKSHI KOHLI Date 2018.03.22 173258 IST Reason 1 General Manager of the Raj Durbhunga, under the Court of Wards v. Maharajah Coomar Ramaput Sing, 1871 2 Vol.
By an elaborate judgment and order dated 31st October, 2011 the Tribunal took the view that the respondent held the post of Train Examiner on the date of his superannuation and his pension had been companyrectly fixed on that basis.
