1 was staying with Shaikh Gulab and that he was cultivating the land as a family member and number as a tenant.
As the plea of tenancy was raised, a reference was made to the Tehsildar for deciding whether appellant No.
This order of the Tehsildar was reversed by the Deputy Collector in appeal as he came to the companyclusion that the said lease deed was number acted upon, that appellant No.
This finding was companyfirmed by the Tribunal in Revision Application.
1 is a tenant of the suit land or number.
The Tehsildar held that he has been cultivating the land under the lease dated 1.1.68 and, therefore, he is a lawful tenant on the land.
Nanavati, J. The Appellant No.
1, nephew of one Shaikh Gulab, claimed to be his tenant in the proceedings initiated in the Civil Court by the respondent who was purchased the property from Shaikh Gulab.
