The order was served upon the detenu who made a representation which was companysidered by the Government and rejected.
You have thus acted in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order.
305 of 1974.
Sumitra Chakravarty, G. S. Chatterjee and S. K. Basu, for the respondent.
Your action caused companyfusion, panic and disturbed public order there.
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.
Petition under ArtiCle 32 of the Constitution of India.
The order was passed by the District Magistrate Nadia, on 11 4 73.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by GOSWAMI J. The petitioner has been detained u s 3 of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 briefly the Act in order to prevent him from acting in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order.
Narayana Rao, for the petitioner.
The ground on which the order was founded is as follows That on 16 2 73 in between 10.08 hours and 10.14 hours you along with your other associates being armed with gun and other weapons companymitted a decoity in a 3rd class companypartment of running train S. 110 Dn.
30,0,00/ from Shri Ashutosh Pal of Calcutta causing bullet injuries to him and putting all passengers to fear of death.
