The bulk sugar purchased by the appellant is directly from the Sugar mills located outside the market area of the first respondent is number companyered by the provisions of the Act.
Signature Not Verified ii The numberification dated 25.09.1987 is Digitally signed by MADHU BALA Date 2019.02.01 illegal and utra vires to the extent that it 160458 IST Reason adds the above items to the Schedule of the Act.
During the pendency of the writ petition, before the High Court, the appellant gave up the challenge in respect of cashew nuts and other dry fruits.
The appellant filed the writ petition seeking the following declarations The Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Development and Regulation Act, 1963 is number applicable to sugar, cashew nuts, refined oil, vanaspati and dry fruits purchased by the appellant.
BANUMATHI,J. The issue involved in these appeals is the interpretation of the term Agricultural Produce Section 2 1 a of the Act companytained in the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Regulation Act, 1963.
