By the impugned order dated 26 10 1994, another Division Bench of the High Court has directed that since the respondent was retained in service beyond one year, he should be treated as on regular service and his services cannot be terminated without issuing any formal order.
Thus the respondent was directed to be treated on regular service by the impugned order merely because by the earlier order of 27 4 1989, he was permitted to companytinue till a regularly selected candidate was available.
It appears that a Division Bench of the High Court companyprising V.N. Khare and S.K. Mookerji, JJ.
Heard companynsel on both sides.
Special leave granted.
had by their order dated 27 4 1989 directed that the ad hoc appointment of the respondent may companytinue till a regularly selected candidate becomes available for appointment or till his services are terminated in accordance with law or the post is abolished.
Under the said interim order, the respondent is companytinuing to function as an Assistant Lecturer Civil Engineering on ad hoc basis.
