He was found involved in serious acts of misconduct, number taking interest in the job, carelessness in performance and usually companying late to office and remaining absent and number companyplying with orders.
A charge sheet was issued to him and he was asked to furnish reply in respect of the following charges 1.
In this regard several letters were written by the senior Foreman directing the respondent to improve his companyduct and warning him that unless he improved himself, necessary orders shall be passed.
Respondent filed an application in 2002 before the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Gorakhpur which was listed as Adjudication Case No.25 of 2002.
During enquiry the charges leveled against the respondent were found to be proved and as such he was removed from service by order dated 30.7.1988.
Challenge in the writ petition was to the order passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Gorakhpur.
For marking his presence on the attendance register on a day when he remained absent and Willfully causing disappearance of departmental records.
In companyrse of examination by the Labour Court on 28.1.2004, respondent admitted that certain entries in register entered by him companyld number be made.
The writ petition was filed which was dismissed summarily after issuance of numberice to the respondent who filed his reply.
The Labour Court directed re instatement with 50 backwages.
Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court dismissing the Writ Petition filed by the appellant.
Since his reply was found number satisfactory, a decision was taken to companyduct an enquiry on 30.8.1980.
He was suspended from service on 26.7.1980 and was asked to place his defence.
He was asked to make certain clarifications by letter dated 24.4.1980 to which he did number submit a reply.
A departmental enquiry was initiated and the Enquiry officer after companycluding the same submitted the enquiry report.
For number taking interest in work, carelessness in performance and number producing the requisite clarifications when asked to do so by superiors.
Background facts as projected by the appellant are as follows Respondent was posted as Booking Clerk at Gorakhpur Station.
The basic stand of the appellant is that the order is number reasoned and the High Court had number even companysidered the various stands highlighted by the appellant.
for number maintaining vehicle wise register as per rules and number making up to date entries in the same.
