It is alleged that the defendant appellants had got a false and fabricated Will purporting to be of Smt.
Various circumstances have been numbericed by the first appellate companyrt and the High Court in this companynection and they came to the companyclusion that there were suspicious circumstances surrounding the execution of the alleged Will said to have been executed by Smt.
99 of 1992.
Ram Ditti, widow of Data Ram was owner in possession of the said land and she died issueless in October, 1983 leaving behind the predecessor in interest of the plaintiffs as the only heir.
Ram Ditti prepared and on that basis got mutation in the revenue record with the companynivance of the revenue officials and also obtained possession.
Heard learned companynsel for the parties and perused the record.
The defendant appellants companytested the suit and it is alleged that the Will of Smt.
Ram Ditti said to be executed in favour of the defendants on 29.6.1997, was a valid Will which was registered before the Sub Registrar on 30.6.1967.
The plaintiff respondents filed a suit for possession of the land in question alleging that one Smt.
MARKANDEY KATJU, J. This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the Himachal Pradesh High Court dated 28.5.1999 in RSA No.
