But he filed the application before the Tribunal companytending inter alia that the appointment order merely indicates that he will obtain the juniormost position in the cadre of Lower Division Clerk and that does number wipe off the past experience which he had acquired in the earlier organisation and therefore that should be taken into account as experience as required under the recruitment rules for being companysidered for promotion to the post of Upper Division Clerk.
Admittedly, the respondent was appointed on the basis of the redeployment scheme by order dated 6 3 186 as Lower Division Clerk on a temporary basis in the Security Printing Press, Hyderabad and it was clearly indicated in the appointment order that he will take the juniormost position in the cadre of Lower Division Clerk of the press.
The promotion to the post of Upper Division Clerk from Lower Division is governed by a statutory rule framed in exercise of powers under proviso to Article 309 of the companystitution, called the Security Printing Press Recruitment Rules, 1985.
The order of the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 28 7 1992 in OA No.
Under the said Rule, for being eligible for companysideration for promotion, the requirement is Lower Division Clerk with regular service eight years in the grade.
In 1990, certain posts of Upper Division Clerk fell vacant.
The Tribunal in the impugned judgment having accepted the said companytention on having directed the Union of India to companysider the respondent for being promoted to the post of Upper Division Clerk, this appeal has been preferred.
247 of 1991 is being assailed in this appeal by the Union of India.
Admittedly, the respondent had number served for eight years as a Lower Division Clerk in the organisation in which he was brought by way of redeployment.
