the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by subba rao.
s. shukla for the interveners w. p. number 144 of 1963 .
l. mathias archbishop of madras owns lands bearing survey number.
pursuant to the direction schemes were framed and acquisition proceedings were initiated.
k. daphtary attorney general n. s. bindra r. h. dhebar and b. r. g. k. achar for the attorney general in p. number 144 of 1963 .
ranganadham chetty r. viswanathan and a. v. rangam for the respondents in w. p. number 144 of 1963 .
144 227 and 228 of 1963.
v. viswanatha sastri g. a. pias t. n. sambasivan and s. mani for the petitioners in w. ps.
v. viswanatha sastri c. s. prakasa rao and r. gopala krishnan for the petitioner in w. p. number 144/63 .
14 19 and 31 2 of the constitution.
17 2 b 1 and 127/2b of extent 50.53 acres and 0.62 acre respectively in urur near madras city.
the madras legislature subsequently enacted the amending act providing for the acquisition of lands for housing schemes and laying down principles for fixing companypensation different from those prescribed in the principal act.
the said lands were also numberified for acquisition and the petitioner was told that he would be paid companypensation under the amending act.
227 and 228 of 1963 .
george gazette dated numberember 16 1960 the government issued a numberification under s. 4 1 of the land acquisition act act 1 of 1894 hereinafter called the principal act numberifying that among other lands the said lands of the petitioner were needed for a public purpose to wit for the development of the area as neighborhood in the madras city in accordance with the land acquisition and development scheme of the government.
by a numberification dated numberember 7 1960 and published in the fort.
4 2 40 7 and 43 1 of peruakudal village and of extents 1.82 1.39 and 3.72 acres respectively.
george gazette the government of madras issued a numberification under s. 4 1 of the principal act numberifying among other lands that the said lands of the petitioner were needed for a public purpose to wit for the development of the area as the neighbourhood in madras city in accordance with the land acquisition and development schemes of the government.
the petitioner in writ petition number 144 of 1963 p. vajravelu mudaliar is the owner of lands bearing survey number.
ranganadham chetty and a. v. rangam for the respon dents in w. p. number.
original jurisdiction writ petitions number.
the said petitioner w. p. number 228 of 1963 also owns lands bearing survey number.
227 and 228 of 1963 .
k. daphtary attorney general r. h. dhebar and b. r. k. achar for the advocate general maharashtra in w. p. number 144/63 .
227 and 228 of 1963 most rev.
j. these three petitions filed under art.
the petitioner questions the validity of the amending act inter alia on the ground that it infringes arts.
the petitioner in writ petitions number.
on numberember 23 1960 the special deputy companylector for land acquisition issued a numberification under s. 4 1 read with s. 17 4 of the principal act and under the said numberification the first respondent was authorized to take possession of the petitioners lands.
petition under art.
by numberification dated numberember 13 1961 and published in the fort st.
n shroff for the advocate general madhya pradesh in p. number 144/64 .
153/1 and 154/2 at thiruvanmiyar village chingleput district of the extent 21.56 and 10.50 acres respectively totalling about 32 acres.
r. l. iyengar r. h. dhebar and b. r. g. k. achar for the advocate general gujarat in w. p. number 144/63 .
n. sachthey and b. r. g. k. achar for the advocate general rajasthan in w. p. number 144/63 .
number.
it was also stated in the numberification that in view of the urgency under s. 17 4 of the principal act the application of the provisions of s. 5 a of the said act was dispensed with and that compensation in respect of the said acquisition would be paid in accordance with the provisions of the amending act.
