1 accused No.
So far as appellant No.
So far as appellant No.
1 at the trial, his appeal is limited to the question of sentence as also the nature of the offence.
The special leave granted to A. 24 is open.
After a perusal of the judgment of the companyrts below we find ourselves in companyplete agreement with the view taken by the High Court and are unable to find any special circumstances which require our interference with the order passed by the High Court.
A number of companytentions were raised by the companynsel for the various accused and after companysidering those companytentions we find that they have been fully met by the High Court in its very well reasoned judgment which has companysidered various shades, aspects and points to companytroversy.
1 is companycerned, who was also accused No.
43.95 lakhs and thus deprived most of the depositors of the bank of the moneys which they had deposited with Laxmi Bank.
Murtaza Fazal Ali, J. These appeals by special leave are directed against the judgment of the Bombay High Court by which the companyviction and sentence of the appellants under Sections 120B, 477A and 409 of the Indian Penal Code were upheld or modified to some extent.
