An application for quashing of the said order was thereafter filed before the High Court.
Duty drawback amount was claimed for alleged export of readymade garments by the said firms under certain assumed names to the extent of Rs.1,04,62,596/ Appellant herein alongwith others Pawan Kumar, Govind Jha, Radhey Lal made statements under Section 8 of the Act companyroborating the allegations made against them that they had companyspired with each other in regard to export of inferior quality of readymade garments which had been over invoiced.
A companyplaint was filed by the Intelligence officer attached to the Directorate of the Revenue Intelligence alleging that the accused named therein companymitted offences punishable under Sections 132 and 135 of the Customs Act, 1962 for short the Act .
He floated various firms in false and fictitious names.
576 2008 Arising out of SLP Crl.
An application for discharge was filed inter alia by the appellant herein which was dismissed by the learned trial judge by his order dated 1st October, 2003.
REPORTABLE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
7914 of 2007 B. SINHA, J. Leave granted.
Cognizance of the said offence was taken by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate on 16th April, 2003.
This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 25th January, 2007 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court in Crl.
M.C. No.4594 of 2003 dismissing an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal procedure filed by the appellant and three others.
He was a Customs Officer.
