It is companytended for the respondent that the dismissal of the SLP does number preclude the Tribunal from reviewing the order since the dismissal was a number speaking order.
That order came to be companyfirmed by the Tribunal dismissing the O.A. on March 6, 1995.
The Commissioner had exercised his power under Art.311 2 b of the Constitution holding that in the circumstances it was number practicable to companyduct an enquiry against the respondent.
The Tribunal after receipt of the order passed by this Court dismissing the SLP, by the impugned order dated 2.11.95 reviewed the order and set aside the order of dismissal.
Against that, the respondent filed SLP C No.11433/95 which was dismissed by this Court on 25.8.95.
Thus this appeal by special leave.
Leave granted.
Admittedly, the respondent had filed O.A. No.1169/93 in the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Bombay Bench against the order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Bombay removing him from service.
Pending the SLP, the respondent filed a review application in the Tribunal.
