The U.P. Government gave recognition to the said institution with effect from 9th April, 19059.
Reliance is placed under Rule 10 of the U.P. Recongnised Basic Schools, Recruitment and Conditions of service of Teachers and other employees, Rules 1975 hereinafter referred to as 1975 Rules , which is quoted hereunder Salary of teachers.
The High Court allowed the said Writ Petition on 29th August, 1991, and directed the respondents to bring the appellants under the provisions of Payment of Salary Act and pay their salary accordingly under rit.
The grievance is, the impugned order has shortened the relief from what was envisaged under the judgment and order dated 29th August, 1991.
It is necessary to refer to certain essential to appreciate the companytroversy in this case.
Returning to the impugned order, we find, inspite of several representations, that the respondents did number respond inspite of the earlier direction, hence it was ordered to pay them under the Payment of Salary Act at least since the earlier High Court judgment and order dated 29th August, 1991.
24284 of 1995 for a specific direction to pay the arrears of salary as aforesaid since 1st July, 1975.
This apart even otherwise the State has number companye in appeal against the impugned judgment dated 7th October, 1996, hence cannot challenge the same in this appeal.
That was disposed of by the High Court on 7th October, 1996, which is the impugned order with the direction to pay the salary of the appellants with effect from 29th August, 1991.
When this was number redressed, the appellants filed another Writ Petition No.
The grievance expressed number is since in the said Writ Petition there was numberprayer for payment of arrears of salary which they are claiming number from 1st July, 1975, hence numberspecific order was passed.
The claim is they should be paid the arrears of their salary number from 29th August, 1991 but from 1st July, 1975.
Since appellants were number satisfied by the impugned order, as they claimed their salaries since 1975 when the aforesaid 1975 Rule came into effect.
On 9th April, 1970, the District Inspector of Schools Dehradun gave permission to the management to run the classes from class 1 to VIII.
24478 of 1988 seeking the direction for payment of salary to the appellants under the Payment of Salary Act.
The case is that the respondents in spite of that are number paying arrears of salary with effect from 1st July, 1975.
A recognised school shall undertake to pay with effect from July 1, 1975, to every teacher and employee the same scale of pay, dearness allowance and additional dearness allowance as are paid to the teachers and employees of the Board possessing similar qualification.
Against this, the State of U.P., who is respondent in the present case filed a Special Leave Petition C No.
The appellants filed Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No.
The companycerned respondents did number bring the appellants under the Payment of Salary Act though they are entitled since the year 1975.
827 of 1993 which was dismissed by this Court on 10th May, 1993 and a review petition against the same which was also dismissed on 17th September, 1993.
Against the aforesaid judgment, addimitteldy, SLP of the State was rejected even Review Petition was rejected.
Misra.
The 59 Gorakha Training Center, Junior High School Deradun Cant, was astablished in they hear 1952 for providing eduction to the children of Ex Service men, serving Military personnels and officers as well as civilians and the Education Department.
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court dated 7th October, 1996 in a writ petition, wherein direction was issued to the respondents to pay the salary of the appellants under the Payment of Salary Act from 29th August, 1991.
J. Special leave is granted.
The case is that they were appointed as Assistant Teachers being duly qualified.
