Taking into account the earlier order dated 16 th January, 2000 by which the application for enrolment filed by Appellant was rejected, the Bar Council of Rajasthan refused to enroll the Appellant as an advocate by the order dated 14th July, 2012.
C.A. 294 of 2007 is filed by the Appellant challenging the order dated 29.06.2003 of the Bar Council of Rajasthan and the companysequential orders dated 02.01.2004 of the Bar Council of India and the order dated 18.03.2004 of the Bar Council of Rajasthan.
The Appellant is a qualified medical doctor who was appointed as a Medical Officer on companytract basis by the Government of Himachal Pradesh.
The legality of the orders dated 14 th July, 2012 of the Bar Council of Rajasthan affirmed by the Bar Council of India on 15 th September, 2012 is subject matter of Special Leave Petitions Civil CC Nos.
In the affidavit filed in Special Leave Petitions Civil CC Nos.
Initially, the said application was rejected on the ground that the Appellant cannot be admitted as an advocate since he has crossed the age of 45 years in view of Rule 1 A of the Enrollment Rules, Bar Council of Rajasthan framed under Section 28 1 d read with Section 24 1 e of the Advocates Act, 1961.
The Bar Council of India companyfirmed the order of 29 th June, 2003 by its resolution dated 3rd January, 2004.
He approached the High Court of Rajasthan seeking a direction to the Bar Council of Rajasthan to decide his application for exemption from training.
The order dated 14 th July, 2012 of the Bar Council of Rajasthan was affirmed by the Bar Council of India on 15th September, 2012.
The Appellant has also referred to his companyviction under Section 419 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 by the Judicial Magistrate on 7 th January, 1988.
Thereafter, the Appellant applied for enrolment as an advocate seeking exemption from training of one year in view of his experience as an advocate earlier.
The Appellant filed yet another application for enrolment as an advocate before the Bar Council of Rajasthan which was rejected on 29 th June, 2003.
The enrolment of the Appellant was cancelled on 6th November, 1995 by the Bar Council of India.
In the Appeal filed against the said judgment of the learned Single Judge, a Division Bench directed the Bar Council of Rajasthan to companysider the application filed by the Appellant without being influenced by the observations made by the learned Single Judge.
The Appellant made another attempt for enrolment by filing an application before the Bar Council of Rajasthan.
He was arrested and sent to judicial custody.
The Bar Council of India companyfirmed the order passed by the Bar Council of Rajasthan on 16 th January, 2000.
The Bar Council of Rajasthan dismissed the application of the Appellant for enrolment on 16 th January, 2000 and referred the matter for companyfirmation of the Bar Council of India.
The said order was affirmed by this Court as the Special Leave Petition filed by the Appellant was dismissed on 5 th August, 1996.
The said Rule was struck down by the High Court of Rajasthan by judgment dated 19 th August, 2008.
The said Writ Petition was dismissed by a learned Single Judge by holding that the Appellant was number entitled for enrolment.
The Bar Council of Rajasthan received a companyplaint that the Appellants enrolment in the State of Himachal Pradesh was obtained by suppression of facts and relevant material.
10531 10532 of 2013.
He further stated that he was absent from service without obtaining leave for which reason his services were terminated by the Director.
He applied for transfer of his enrolment to the State of Rajasthan which was permitted by the Bar Council of India on 27 th May, 1989.
10531 10532 of 2013, the Appellant stated that a FIR registered against him at Police Station Dhambola on 15 th April, 1988.
NAGESWARA RAO, J. Leave granted in S.L.P. C CC Nos.
The Appellant was enrolled as an advocate in the Bar Council of Himachal Pradesh in July, 1988.
10531 10532 of 2013.
