In our view, this judgment has numberrelevance at all.
That was a case where the claim before the National Commission was based on the accident itself.
The appellants who are the wife and children filed a claim before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for short, the National Commission for damages on the ground of negligence of the hospital and the doctors.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
By the impugned judgment, the National Commission dismissed the claim merely on the ground that in view of the judgment of this Court in the case of Chairman, Thiruvaluvar Transport Corporation v. Consumer Protection Council, , they had numberjurisdiction.
Briefly stated, the facts are as follows On November 1, 1992, one Mr. Rajeev Sapra was travelling in a Maruti car.
Appeal admitted.
The car was hit by a tempo as a result of which the said Mr. Sapra became unconscious and was rushed to Safdarjung Hospital.
