She is also permitted to draw the pay against the post of Lady Lecturer Secretarial Practice Hindi j, but this is limited only upto August 22, 1988.
It was proposed to call for fresh applications for filling up the said post, but before that companyld be done, the said post itself stood abolished by virtue of the order dated July 13, 1988 issued in implementation of revised staff structure based on Madan Committee recommendations.
Complaining against the said order, the respondent, Mis Vijay Kumari approached the Tribunal on 3rd December, 1990.
2000 3200/ .
She companytinued in the post till 22nd February, 1988 i.e., for a period of about 15 years.
The respondent, Vijay Kumari was appointed a Lab.
On September 19, 1988 she was reverted to the post of Lab.
As against these prescribed qualifications, the respondent possessed a third division degree in B.A., a third division degree in M.A. Hindi and a diploma in Secretarial Practice.
5 as a Junior Lecturer.
A number of lady Junior Lecturers are permitted to draw pay against the posts of Lady Lecturers specified against their respective names.
950 1500/ .
23.8.1988.
The Union of India in its companynter affidavit disputed the various averments made by the respondent.
It is further stated that along with others the respondents candidature was also companysidered on the basis of proposed amended qualifications but the Staff Selection which met on May 19, 1988 did number find any of the candidates including the respondent as suitable for the said post.
It is stated that the respondent had undoubtedly performed the duties attached to the post of Junior Lecturer for a period of four years and thereafter was promoted temporarily as Junior Lecturer, but that was because numberqualified persons were available for the said post.
Attendant in the Womens Polytechnic, Directorate of Technical Education, Delhi Administration on October 8, 1973 in the pay scale of Rs.
2551 of 1990 The Union of India is the appellant.
It stated that according to the rules in force upto June 18, 1988, she was number qualified for being appointed as Junior Lecturer.
P. Jeevan Reddy, J. Leave granted.
Heard the companynsel for the parties.
She characterised the impugned order of reversion as mala fide, discriminatory and companytrary to rules.
For the last four years i.e., from May 16, 1984 to February 22, 1988 she was teaching the students of two year diploma companyrse in Secretarial Practice Hindi .
Attendant with effect from August 23, 1988 under an order which reads as follows In companytinuation of this Directorate order of even number dated 24.7.1988, and with prior approval of Secretary, Training and Technical Education, Miss. Vijay Kumari, appointed as Jr. Lecturer, Secretarial Practice Hindi , on purely ad hoc and emergent basis stands reverted to her original post of Laboratory Attendant w.e.f.
The appeal is preferred against the judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, allowing the petition filed by the respondent in C.A.No.
The name of the respondent occurs at serial No.
