He also held that as the Trust was holding an exemption certificate, the respondents had numberright to remain on the land as legal heirs of the original lessee, Vishwanath and, therefore, they were in unauthorised occupation of the land.
1 to 4 filed a revision application before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal challenging the said order.
49/89 and Writ Petition No.
Civil Appeal No.
Respondent Nos.
The Sub Divisional Officer, Daryapur allowed that application as he found that the respondents had number even initiated any proceeding for getting the declaration that they are the statutory owners.
49/89 is disposed of by this judgment.
The appellant trust is a certified landlord under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Vidarbha Region Act, 1958 hereinafter referred to as the Act .
8556/94 has died and the appellant trust has, therefore, filed an application for bringing on record the Lrs.
8555/94 arising out of Writ Petition No.
2929/88.
1 in C.A. No.
Respondent No.
It made an application under Section 120 of the Act for summary eviction of the respondents on the ground that they have numberright to remain on the land as legal heirs of the deceased tenant or in any other capacity and thus they are unauthorisedly occupying or wrongfully in possession of its land.
This appeal and C.A. No.
8556/94 involve a companymon question and they also arise out of a companymon judgment dated 20 2 1990 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No.
8556/94 is, therefore, delinked and only Civil Appeal No.
of respondent No.
