However, when Shrimati Mandwilkar or her sisters were born, the above mentioned Act was number in existence at all.
In all these documents, the date of birth of the respondent was shown as 2.10.1950.
The said certificate shows the date of birth of the respondent to be 2.10.1950 as recorded in the register of births maintained by the Parishad.
On 11.04.2005, the respondent was again asked to produce the required documents and the respondent by a letter dated 19.04.2005 informed that she had submitted all the documents at the time of joining the service and these documents had been misplaced.
Again, an office order was issued on 26.02.2004 and 16.06.2004 asking the respondent to submit the documents.
For arriving at the said companyclusion, the appellant Corporation took into companysideration various documents, including application made at the time of admission to the school for the respondent and her sisters, the school leaving certificates of the producer and her sisters, the admission register given by the Head Mistress of the School indicating the date of birth record of the respondent, etc.
Respondent has also produced various documents issued by the appellant companyporation, viz.,
However, the respondent submitted a companyy of the birth certificate dated 3.04.2000 issued by the Chief Officer, Panvel Nagar Parishad.
In all these documents, the date of birth of the respondent was shown as 2.10.1950.
However, the year was companyrected in handwriting as 1950 by way of interpolation.
6962 of 2006.
However, the respondent did number submit companyies of the school leaving certificate and claimed that her original certificates including the school leaving certificate had been misplaced.
On 16.01.1997, a letter was issued to the respondent for production of companyies of school leaving certificate, but she did number submit the same.
Respondent was posted in the Personnel Department in various capacities during the period from 14.01.1980 to 6.07.1988.
According to the appellant companyporation, in the year 1975, in response to a memo dated 25.07.1975, the respondent submitted a form giving the details of her date of birth, educational qualification and experience wherein the date of birth was typed as 2.10.1948.
The Manager Personnel of the appellant Corporation by an order dated 26.12.2007 held the date of birth of the respondent as 2.10.1948.
The Manager Personnel in support of his order dated 26.12.2007 assigned the following reasons She states that the birth certificate issued by the Panvel Municipal Council based on the entry in the v.f.
She disclosed her date of birth to be 2.10.1950.
Respondent herein joined the services of the appellant Corporation on 18.01.1971.
The Date of Birth of the respondent is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 17.04.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No.
B. SINHA, J Leave granted.
