205 280 AS , Reservation Supervisors in the scale of Rs.
2 Railway Board to withdraw its directions and orders to Respondent No.
That letter companyveyed the following decision of the Railway Board The total number of higher grade posts of Assistant Reservation Supervisors in the scale of Rs.
1 to partially cancel the panel shown at Annexure E to the petition and 3 for companysequential reliefs The railway Board by its companymunication No.
754E/20 11 Trip EIC and to restore the names of the petitioners on the panel as shown in Annexure E to the petition and to make permotions on the basis of that panel 2 a writ of mandamus to Respondent No.
In the petition as originally filed, allegations in that regard were quite vague and devoid of details.
E NG 63 PMI 52 dated February 29, 1964, to the General Managers, All India Railways, prescribed a channel of promotion for Enquiry Cum Reservation Clerks, who uptil then had numberchannel of promotion.
The plea of mala fides made by the petitioner was repudiated by the respondents.
In the reply affidavit.
Hence they can be companysidered in a companymon judgment.
I the petitioners gave some details in support of their plea.
In these petitions, the petitioners who are serving as Enquiry Cum Reservation Clerks in the Northern Railway, seek the following reliefs 1 a writ of mandamus to Respondent No.
1 General Manager Northern Railway requiring him to withdrew his order dated November 3, 1965, order No.
They raise companymon questions of law and fact.
S. Hegde, J. These are companynected writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution.
