The attempt made by the respondent to withdraw his resignation after it has been duly accepted by the I.G., was ineffective.
He vendered his resignation, which was accepted by the Deputy Inspector General D.I.G. of the Force on 17/10/1984.
The respondent was a Sub Inspector in the Central Industrial Security Force for short the Force .
Two grounds were urged in the High Court in support of the writ petition.
on 17/10/1984 was valid and it companyld number be withdrawn by the respondent subsequently on 4/12/1984.
Both these prayers were rejected.
The High Court has accepted both the companytentions.
The first companytention of the respondent was, therefore, erroneously accepted by the High Court.
The other companytention of the respondent was also wrongly accepted by the High Court.
S. VERMA, J. Leave granted.
The other companytention was that the rejection of the prayer for re enlistment as a member of the Force after acceptance of the resignation was an arbitrary exercise of the discretionary power companyferred by the relevant rules.
The respondent then, on 4/12/1984 applied to withdraw his resignation and in the alternative prayed for re enlistment in the Force.
This appeal by special leave is against the Judgment dated 30th March, 1992 of the Division Bench of the High Court of Orissa, by which the writ petition OJC No.
The first ground was that the D.I.G. was number the companypetent authority under the relevant rules to accept the resignation on account of which there was numbervalid acceptance of the resignation before its withdrawal on 4/12/1984.
543 of 1988 filed by the respondent has been allowed.
Accordingly, acceptance of respondents resignation by the D.i.g.
Hence this appeal by special leave.
