and chairman kurukshetra development board.
the secretary kurukshetra development board.
the secretary to government of haryana local government department.
the deputy advocate general of haryana.
lamba deputy advocate general denied that the impugned order was made on the basis of his personal grudge against the appellant.
appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated the 21st july 1972 of the punjab haryana high companyrt in civil writ number 1454 of 1972.
the office superintendent dy.
nanda in writ petition number 707 of 1972.
pritam singh jain advocate.
companymissioners office karnal.
g. l. nanda m.p.
1 6 and 8 11.
the main allegation which the appellant made in respect of the counter affidavit filed by mr.
on 8th october 1971 the legal remembrancer and secretary to government legislative department haryana wrote a letter to all administrative departments and heads of departments in the state informing them that it had been decided to fill in some posts in the law department by selection of qualified candidates from amongst the government servants working in other departments and that for the present the tenure of those posts was one year only and the candidates would be appointed on an ad hoc basis.
to the writ petition questioning his reversion he impleaded the following as parties state of haryana through the legal remembrancer and secretary to government law and legislative department.
p. s. jain companynsel for the board and the secretary of the board and that he was acting beyond the scope of his activities as a legal assistant in the office of the deputy companymissioner karnal and was over reaching the deputy companymissioner.
in his companynter affidavit the secretary of the law department stated that the appellant had been reverted on account of his poor performance as legal assistant and denied the allegation of companyspiracy made by the appellant.
k. daphtary n. h. hingorani and mrs.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by alagiriswami j. this is an appeal against the judgment of the punjab haryana high companyrt dismissing in limine the appellants writ petition for quashing an order reverting him from the post of legal assistant in the office of the deputy companymissioner karnal to his parent office.
was the chairman.
the deputy advocate general in his companynter affidavit has quoted a portion of the counter affidavit prepared by the appellant in that writ petition which undoubtedly shows the appellants poor knumberledge of law.
h. v. goswami deputy companymissioner karnal.
nanda making insinuations against certain officers including the secretary of the kurukshetra development board.
he was transferred to the office of the deputy companymissioner karnal on february 17 1972.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 640 of 1973.
the deputy advocate general states that the appellant made reckless allegations against the secretary of the kurukshetra development board and its advocate mr.
the advocate general filed a companynter affidavit denying that the appellant had brought to his numberice the damaging portion of the companynter affidavit filed on behalf of mr.
the deputy advocate general wrote to the secretary of the law department that the appellants work was number only perfunctory but below average.
the advocate general of haryana.
the district attorney karnal.
thereupon the secretary spoke to the deputy companymissioner karnal to find out his views about the performance of the appellant and the deputy commissioner told him that he was dissatisfied with the work and performance of the appellant.
irrigation branch haryana at chandigarh.
the appellant alleged in the writ petition that the order of reversion was the outcome of a companyspiracy of respondents number 2 4 5 7 8 and 10.
he also went and met mr.
the appellant was working originally as an assistant in the office of the chief engineer p.w.d.
k. hingorani for the appellant.
it is on these grounds that the reversion was made.
the appellant sent a report to mr.
the deputy advocate general seems to have felt that the appellant was unnecessarily running to mr.
irrigation works haryana chandigarh.
the chief engineer p.w.d.
nanda in person without the directions or the permission of the deputy companymissioner of karnal under whom he was working.
g. nanda and without rhyme or reason criticising the counter affidavit and making allegations against mr.
the appellant was appointed on an ad hoc basis.
g. l. nanda m.p.
p. s. jain and the secretary of the board had companyluded to the detriment of the board in submitting the companynter affidavit.
c. bhandare r. n. sachthey and m. n. shroff for respondents number.
in pursuance of that letter the appellant applied for the post and he was appointed on 10th february 1972 as legal assistant on ad hoc basis in the office of the deputy companymissioner hissar.
as already stated he was reverted to his parent office on the 27th of april 1972.
the circumstances which led to his reversion seem to be as follows there was a writ petition number 707 of 1972 against the kurukshetra development board of which mr.
nanda was that the companynsel for the board that is mr.
