Under Article 32 of the Constitution WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION CIVIL No.7905 OF 1979 From the Judgment and Order dated 29 8 1978 of the Allahabad High Court, in S.A. No.
A dated 18 12 57 addressed to the General Managers of all Indian Railways.
S. Chitale, V.M. Tarkunde, and A.N. Karkhanis for RR 28 and 31.
D. Gupta in person for impleading RR in WP 147/76.
N. Sinha, Attorney General, Mr. M.K. Banerjee, Addl.
This was companymunicated by the Railway Board to the General Managers of all Indian Railways by letter No.
This was mentioned by the Board in letter No.
E. GF P 56RC 16 Pt.
multi varne Service system was itself number productive of a career neurosis, destructive of the very efficiency which is sought to achieve.
Solicitor General, R.B. Datar, A.K. Ganguli, R.N. Sachthey and Miss A. Subhashini for RR 1 and 2.
ORIGINAL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition Nos.
C. Gupta and Ramesh Chand for RR 14.
Madan Bhatia and D. Goburdhan for RR 20.
E 55RC 16 Pt.
It was also decided by the President that the Railway Board of the companypetent authority to appoint Temporary Assistant Officers in the various departments of the Railways.
147 to 151 of 1976.
Girdharee Singh and S.K. Jain for the Intervener.
Though in their orders of appointment as temporary Assistant Engineers, the petitioners and others were told that six of them would be absorbed into the Indian Railway Service of Engineers Class I every year, the quota was increased to eight per year in 1957 and fifteen per year in 1961.
S. Nariman, Anil B. Dawan, P.H. Parekh, C.B. Singh and R. Karanjwala for RR 1 19.
C. Bhandare, Mrs. S. Bhandare and T. Sreedharan for the Petitioners.
A dated November, 22, 1956.
In 1960 the quota was fixed at 60 of the actual intake of Probationers from the CES etc.
887/70.
