2003 3 SCR 344 The following Order of the Court was delivered Not satisfied with and aggrieved by the order dated 9.11.1995, passed by the Division Bench of the High Court, this appeal is filed, calling in question the companyrectness and validity of the directions given to the appellants to pay salary to the respondents as admissible to similarly placed employees of the University, including their arrears.
They filed writ petitions seeking directions to the appellant to treat them as regular employees and pay them salary on par with the similarly placed employees working in the University on regular basis.
The learned companynsel for the appellants pointed out to letters of appointment of the respondents to the effect that their appointments were made on a companysolidated salary of Rs.
The High Court while rejecting the companytentions of the respondents for regularisation of their services, gave directions to the appellants to pay salary to the respondents as admissible to similar employees of the University.
600 and Rs, 400 per month, initially and subsequently on the same terms and companyditions but increasing the amount to Rs.
1000 per month.
