An appeal was preferred by the appellant which was decided by learned Additional District Judge, Faridabad, and was allowed.
Questioning the judgment and decree passed by the First Appellate Court, second appeal was filed which was allowed by the impugned judgment.
It is to be numbered that cross objection was also filed in terms of Order 41 Rule 22 CPC.
The appellant filed written statement refuting the assertions by the plaintiff.
1, 2 and 10 in favour of the respondent decreeing the suit in mandatory injunction.
Replication was filed by the respondent.
The trial companyrt framed 11 issues and learned Subordinate Judge, 1st class, Palwal, decided issue number.
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
These appeals are directed against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court disposing of an appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in short CPC .
The respondent as plaintiff has filed a suit for mandatory injunction.
