It was also indicated that the applications in the prescribed format with companyplete information should reach the prescribed authority before 29th July, 1995 and incomplete applications and applications without necessary enclosures were to be rejected.
The written test was companyducted on 1.10.1995 and the viva vice was companyducted on 25.11.1995.
Factual backdrop in a nutshell is as follows Karnataka State Financial Corporation hereinafter referred to as the Corporation invited applications for recruitment to two posts of Manager Finance and Accounts by advertisement dated 18.7.1995.
Judgment in Ashok Kumar Sharmas case No.
I was delivered on 18.12.1992 and decision in the review petition in the said case was rendered on 10.3.1997.
The advertisement inviting applications for the two posts of Manager Finance and Accounts , one post for general and one post of scheduled caste, prescribed the requisite educational qualification.
I held the field.
A writ application was filed before the Karnataka High Court at Bangalore challenging the selection of respondent No.4 and placing respondent No.5 in the waiting list.
Similar was stated to be the position vis vis respondent No.5.
The view of the learned Single Judge was affirmed by the Division Bench.
Both these appeals have companymon factual matrix, and legal panorama and, therefore, are dealt with by this companymon judgment.
A writ appeal was filed before the Division Bench.
Though respondent No.4 was number qualified on the last date of submission of application, he was permitted to attend and appear for the written test.
Appellant and respondents 4 and 5 were applicants in response to the advertisement.
The appointment of respondent No.4 was made when the earlier decision of Ashok Kumar Sharmas case No.
The High Court by the impugned judgment held that though admittedly on 18.7.1995 i.e. on the date of advertisement the respondent No.4 was number qualified to make an application, yet few dates and facts are relevant.
8113 8114/2002 ARIJIT PASAYAT, J Leave granted.
It was stipulated in the advertisement that the age and other qualifications were to be reckoned as of 31.7.1995.
When respondent No.4 was selected, appellant challenged his selection to be number in accordance with law.
Therefore, a review of the judgment of the Division Bench was necessary.
Arising out of SLP C Nos.
However, on the date of interview he was eligible.
The written examination was held on 1.10.1995 and viva voce was companyducted on 25.11.1995.
He had appeared for the M.B.A. examination in April 1995 and the results were declared on 4.9.1995.
At least by the time the written examination and the viva voce tests were held, he had acquired the requisite qualification.
