Again SLP Nos.
129 of 1992 in OA No.
3493, 3494, 3396 and 3397 of 1991 .
In the aforesaid order dated 28 2 1992, the Bench numbered the intention of the respondents to revise the seniority of the entire cadre of Telegraph Engineering Service Group B Officers as per para 206 of the PT Manual Volume IV.
195 of 1992 in OA No.
2407 of 1988 and iii Junior Telecom Officers Forum for Redressal of Grievances said to represent 6000 affected persons and Junior Telecom Officers Association India both of which companytend that the judgment of the Allahabad High Court and the decisions of this Tribunal following the said decision do number companystitute good precedents, that they are judgments per incuriam, that the matter should be companysidered on the merits afresh and that the applicants before us should number be granted the reliefs sought by them MP.
195 of 1992 ii the Telecom Engineering Services Association India which also supports the stand of the applicants MP No.
195 of 1992 in O.A. No.
A Review Petition filed by the Union of India against the judgment of the Principal Bench of the Tribunal dated 7 6 1991 was dismissed by the Tribunal on 1 10 1991.
1 and SLP C of 1991 filed by the Junior Telecom Officers Association India seeking permission to file SLP.
1 Writ Petition Nos.
2739 and 2652 of 1991, decided on 20 2 1985 The Tribunal thereafter companysidered the submissions of the petitioners before it and the interventionists and took the view that since the Special Leave Petitions against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 20 2 1985 were dismissed on merits, it achieved finality.
3384 86 of 1986 filed by the Union of India against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court were dismissed by this Court on merit on 8 4 1986.
2667 of 1991.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by YOGESHWAR DAYAL, J. This Order will dispose of above said 58 matters.
However, we are taking the facts from Special Leave Petition No.
Thereafter, another Bench of the Tribunal presided over by its Chairman gave certain directions to the respondents on 28 2 1992 in a batch of Contempt Petitions filed by the petitioners alleging number compliance of the judgment of the Principal Bench of the Tribunal dated 7 6 1991.
19716 22 of 1991 filed by them against the judgment of the Principal Bench of the Tribunal dated 7 6 1991 were dismissed with some observations on 6 1 1992 along with Intervention Application No.
16698 of 1992.
This Petition is directed against the judgment dated 29 6 1992 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in Review Application No.
This decision was From the Judment and Order dated 29 6 1992 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi in Review Application No.
2667 of 1991 rendered by the Principal Bench over a companyflict of decision on two basic issues which arose for companysideration, namely 1 whether the applicants and persons similar to them are entitled to promotion from the grade of Jr. Engineers to the next higher grade in the Telegraph Engineering Service Group B Assistant Engineers and equivalent post on the basis of the year of passing the qualifying Departmental Examination envisaged in para 206 of the PT Manual and number on the basis of their respective seniority as had been adopted and followed by the respondents and 2 whether in the facts and circumstances, they are entitled to refixation of inter se seniority on the said basis and promotions with retrospective effect together with back wages.
After companysidering the judgment of the High Court of Allahabad Parmanand Lal and Brij Mohan v. Union of Indial and decisions of various Benches of the Tribunal which followed the above said judgment of the Allahabad High Court, the Tribunal numbericed that the Allahabad High Court and the various Benches of the Tribunal have companycluded that the applicants are entitled to promotion, refixation of inter se seniority and companysequential benefits as claimed by them and have decided the above said two issues in their favour.
