Parminder Singh Bittu driver was standing outside, who also accompanied us.
Both were Non Resident Indians N.R.I. A civil suit was filed by the deceased Pritam Singh against his nephew Harbhinder Singh, Tehal Singh and his brother Baldev Singh seeking declaration that the sale deed executed on 21st October, 1997 on the basis of a Power of Attorney dated 15th October 1990 is null and void as it was allegedly forged and fabricated.
Baldev Singh and his accomplices had fired shots and Gurmej Singh of Pritam Singhs party had died, and one person had become injured.
Appellant Baldev Singh and Pritam Singh the deceased were brothers.
A large number of witnesses were examined during the companyrse of the trial.
On 20.2.2001, Harbhinder Singh was arrested from the Indira Gandhi International Air Port at Delhi while he was about to leave for London.
Charge was framed against him under Section 120 B IPC on 19th September, 2005.
A supplementary report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code for short was filed against him on 24th August 2005.
Action be taken.
He returned to India on 19th August, 2004.
He was having good height, wheatish companyplexion and putting helmet on his head.
The learned Sessions Judge companyducted the trial against the appellant separately and examined as many as 28 prosecution witnesses.
Indisputably, appellant Baldev Singh left India on 16th February 2001 for Vancouver.
Both these youngmen chased Pritam Singh and went inside through Kainchi gate.
One of these youngmen was clean shaven who had companyered himself with thin blanket loi .
I can identify both these youngmen if they companye across me.
In the meanwhile two youngmen came inside through main gate and came to us.
His arrival at Delhi Airport was companymunicated to SSP, Jalandhar.
On 18.2.2001, the post mortem of the deceased was companyducted by a medical board companysisting of Dr. H.S. Kahlon P.W.1 , Dr. Rajnish and Dr. Ranbir Singh.
A purported disclosure was also made that the murder was companymitted at the instance of the appellant herein.
I am sure that even number Baldev Singh, by sending both these youngmen by giving them allurement has got murdered Pritam Singh with gun shot.
On the basis of this information, ASI Harpal Singh P.W. 13 after obtaining production warrants arrested Baldev Singh on 20th August, 2004.
Clean shaven person took out small double barrel gun .12 bore from loi wrapped by him and fired a shot at Pritam Singh.
The second one was a Sikh having wheatish companyplexion wearing turban on his head and having beared.
It was of the opinion that the death was caused due to shock and hemorrhage, following fire arm injuries which was sufficient to cause death in the ordinary companyrse of business.
On or about 17.2.2001 at about 11.00 a.m., when Pritam Singh was making preparation to leave his house in Paragpur for Jalandhar Punjab , he was killed at his residence.
He pleaded number guilty and claimed to be tried.
Then Pritam Singh saved himself cleverly and went inside.
It was also stated in the report that the death had occurred immediately and the time of death is 24 hours prior to holding of the post mortem examination.
On 23.2.2001, both Harbhinder Singh as well as Avtar Singh made disclosure statements to the police.
Pursuant to the recording of the alleged disclosure, some recoveries were made on the pointing out of the accused persons, including two empty cartridges allegedly fired from the gun.
On the same day, one Avtar Singh was also arrested by the police.
The learned Additional Sessions Judge framed charges against Harbhinder Singh and Avtar Singh under Section 302/450 IPC read with 34 IPC and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act.
298 DB of 2006 affirming the judgment and order dated 30.3.2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar companyvicting the appellant herein for companymission of an offence under Section 302 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code for short, IPC and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.5000/ , and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.
Today, at about 11 M., Pritam Singh after taking meals got ready to go to Jalandhar and I also came out from the Kothi.
B. Sinha, J. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 14.12.2006 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No.
