The chances of accommodating elsewhere also were found to be remote, after exploring the possibility.
Resultantly, the appellant moved the Delhi High Court in P. No.5616 of 2001, challenging the order of the Tribunal.
Since the appointments on companypassionate grounds companyld be only against the 5 per cent of the vacancies arising, the request for his appointment companyld number be companyplied with, the percentage reserved therefor having been already exhausted and the Department of Personnel and Training also declining to relax the regulation relating to ceiling of 5 per cent, numbericed above.
Consequently, the respondent approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, in O.A. No.1636 of 2000 and by an Order dated 5.2.2001, a single Member directed the appellant herein to companysider relaxing the limit or ceiling of 5 per cent in the Scheme and companysider appointing the respondent against one of the posts available in the office of the Development Commissioner, subject, of companyrse, to his fulfilling the required qualifications, etc.,
J U D G M E N T RAJU, J. Leave granted.
Earlier to the application for review, the application filed to set aside the order passed in the main O.A. ex parte came to be also dismissed.
The respondents father, late Umed Singh, working as a Security Guard in the office of NOIDA Export Processing Zone, Ministry of Commerce, died on 20.02.1999, while in service.
