After his retirement, he filed a suit for declaration that he was entitled to be promoted from the post of Police Inspector to the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police with effect from 9 9 1964, the date when his juniors were promoted as Deputy Superintendent of Police.
District Judge.
The State of Punjab the appellant filed objection before the Execution Court regarding the decree holders claim for interest, on the ground that the decree which was sought to be executed did number companytain any direction for awarding interest to the decree holder.
30,383.35 as interest from the judgment debtor.
The State filed appeal against the order of the Execution Court which was dismissed by the Addl.
District Judge, Patiala set aside the decree of the Trial Court and decreed the respondents suit holding that the respondent deserved promotion as Dy.
The suit was dismissed by the Trial Court.
In addition to the benefits arising from the decree, the respondent claimed companypound interest 12 per annum on the amount found due to him.
The respondent put the decree into execution for the recovery of arrears of salary w.e.f.
He further claimed relief for all companysequential benefits, rights and privileges.
The respondent was retired from State Police Service of Punjab as Deputy Superintendent of Police.
Leave granted.
9 9 64 till his date of retirement, arrears of pension and other amounts.
S. P. w.e.f.
On appeal the Addl.
9 9 64 and companysequently he was entitled to all benefits, rights and privileges which he would have drawn had he been promoted on 9 9 64.
The decree became final as numberappeal was filed against the judgment and decree of the Addl.
