In the ACR of 1983 84 he was described as Average and the DIG also categorised him as an officer of average calibre.
For the years 1982 83 he was described as outstanding whereas in the year 1983 84 the re marks were that his performance was good.
H.N. Srivastava who has been impleaded as a party was described as an officer with excellent performance in the year 1980 81.
In that particular year, he was holding a dual charge, being Joint Superintendent of Police as well as holding charge of part of the establishment work at the Intelligence Headquarters.
He had been promoted as Joint Superintendent of Police on 24 11 1982.
He was promoted as Joint Superintendent of Police on 11 7 1983.
For the year 1981 82 he was categorised as Good by the Re porting Officer while the Reviewing Officer had mentioned his companyduct to be excel lent without making any categorisation.
The appellant S.K. Sharma during the years 1980 81, 1981 82 and 1982 83 was shown as Good in the ACRs of those years, although there was numberformal categorisation.
