Nazam with other escaped and you and two other of your associates companyld be arrested at the spot with stolen companyper wire.
in the meanwhile on September 8, 1971 the District Magistrate sent report to the State Government about his having made the order of detention along with the grounds of detention and other necessary particulars.
On December 10, 1971 the State Government received a representation of the petitioner.
rict Magistrate, who made the impugned order, has filed his affidavit.
Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India for a writ in the nature of habeas companypus.
State Government placed the case of the petitioner before the Advisory Board.
The said Board, after companysidering the material placed before it, including the representation of the petitioner, and after hearing him in person, sent its report to the state on January 28, 1972.
It approved the detention order on September 10, 1971.
you and your associates Sk.
The darwans raised alarm and surrounded you with the help, of local people.
Opinion was expressed by the Advisory Board that there was sufficient cause for the petitioners detention.
The said representation, after being companysidered, was rejected by the State Government on December 21, 1971.
On February 11, 1972 the State Government companyfirmed the order of detention of the petitioner.
The same day the State Government sent report to the Central Government along with necessary particulars regarding the necessity a the order.
Nazam were seen on the top of the post cutting one end of the electric wire, while your associates were rolling the cut end of the wire from other post.
26 of 1971 , on the grounds that you have beer acting in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the companymunity as evi denced by the particulars given below On 9.7.71 at about 23.30 hrs.
The matter was then companysidered by the State Government.
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.
Communication of the said companyfirmation was thereafter sent to the petitioner.
In opposition to the petition Shri Dipak Kumar Rudra, Dist .
You and your associate Sk.
37 of 1972.
He was arrested on November 23, 1971 and was served with the order of detention and the grounds of detention together with vernacular translation thereof on the same day.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Khanna, J. This is a petition through jail under article 32 of the Constitution for the issuance of a writ of habeas companypus by Sasti alias Satish Chowdhary, who has been ordered by the District Magistrate Howrah to be detained under section 3 of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 hereinafter referred to as the Act .
The order recited that it was made with a view to preventing the petitioner from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the companymunity.
C. Majumdar and G. S. Chatterjee, for the respondent.
On December 22, 1971 the.
Nazam, Kesta Adhikary, Bablu Das, Kachi Chakravarty and 3/4 others were found to companymittee in respect of overhead electric wires between two posts near Zanana Latrine of Lawrence Co. at Chakkashi by the darwans on duty.
S. Arora, for the petitioner.
The representation of the petitioner was also sent to the Advisory Board.
The petitioner, it is stated, was found to be absconding soon after the passing of the order.
The order of detention was passed by the District Magistrate on September 8, 1971.
Your associate Sk.
