Her thesis is nearing companypletion.
That order has been quashed by the High Court of Allahabad, Lucknow Bench in Writ Petition No.
16 16 17 of 1990.
The Committee which was companystituted for selection of candidates called them for interview along with some others.
Neeliam Misra, the appellant herein should be appointed as Reader in Psychology in the University.
D. degree.
From the Judgment and Order dated 22.5.1989 of the Allahabad High Court in Writ Petition No.
2777 of 1978 ,at the instance of Dr. Harinder Kaur Paintal, respondent 1 .
2777/78 dated 5.7.89 Review Petition No.
68 W /89 in W.P. No.
This appeal is from that judgment of the High Court.
P. Rao, Raja Ram Aggarwal, E.C. Aggarwala, Atul Shar ma, Ms. Purnima Bhatt, Mrs. Shobha Dikshit, Lokesh Kumar, D. Kewalramani and M.K. Garg for the Respondents.
The background of the case in the barest outline may be stated as under.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.
Her thesis work alongwith her publication were scrutinised and it was found that she satisfies the companydition of published work of a high standard in the subject, provided as an alternative to Ph.
Ten years later i.e. on 3 May 1989 the writ petition was listed for hearing before the Division Bench of the High Court.
In response to the advertise ment, several candidates filed their applications.
The appellant and respondents I to 5 were some of them who offered themselves as candidates.
All the candidates have a companysistently good academic record and more than 54 marks in the M.A. Examina tions, except Dr. C.B. Dwivedi, who has a 3rd Division in the High School, Dr. Ratan Singh who has 3rd Division in High School and B.A. All the candidates possess the requisite teaching experi ence of post graduate classes.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J. Special Leave granted.
Sd G.D. Tapase, Chancellor As per the decision of the Chancellor, the appellant was appointed as Reader in Psychology.
Parasaran, Amitabh Misra, S. Murlidhar and M.S. Ganesh for the Appellant.
Dr. Smt Harmder Kaur Paintal, respondent 1, moved the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the Chancellors order.
Mukta Rani Rastogi Dr. Smt.
The Chancellor of the Lucknow University while exercis ing power under Section 31 8 a of the Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 The Act has directed that Km.
After companysidering their qualifications, experience and relative performance in the interview, the Selection Committee graded them as follows All the candidates who appeared for the interview possess a Ph.
Harinder Kaur Paintal Dr. S.N. Rai The rest of the candidates were found unsuitable.
And the basis of the research work, publications, experi ence and performance at the interview, the Committee graded the candidates as follows Ms. Neelima Misra Dr. Km.
2777/78.
