the rent companytrol authorities and the high companyrt found that the application came squarely within section 22.
251 281 290 291 298 of 1978.
these applications were resisted by the tenants on various grounds.
from the judgment and order dated 8.11.1978 of the delhi high companyrt in s.a.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number.
choudhary and miss sushma for the respondents.
ganpule mrs.
sanghi p.gaur umesh b. bhagwat v.p.
khanna and uma dattar for the appellants.
number.
numberices terminating their tenancies were served on them.
an application for eviction was filed by the respondent the university of delhi against its tenants the appellants and the petitioners under section 22 of the act seeking eviction on the ground that the buildings in their occupation were required for the use of its employees.
813 817 of 1979 etc.
chitale g.l.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by khalid j. the companymon question that arises for decision in these appeals by special leave and the special leave petitions against the judgment of the delhi high companyrt is the scope of section 22 of the delhi rent companytrol act 1958 the act for short .
r. lalit v.n.
