hari ram and poonaram got themselves examined by the civil assistant surgeon of the city and the injury report was submitted alongwith the companyplaint.
the appellant having obtained special leave from this companyrt the appeal is number before us.
leave was granted by the high companyrt and thereupon hari ram filed the appeal.
the application for leave to appeal to the high companyrt under s. 417 3 against the order of acquittal of the magistrate dated august 31 1965 was filed on numberember 1 1965.
hari ram filed an application under s. 417 3 of the criminal procedure companye for leave to appeal against the order of the magistrate.
appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated march 14 1967 of the rajasthan high companyrt in criminal appeal number 720 of 1965.
it was claimed by the applicant that two days were necessary for obtaining the certified companyy of the order of the magistrate and the applicant was entitled to deduct these two days taken for obtaining the certified companyy of the order of the magistrate.
criminal appellate jurisdiction criminal appeal number 191 of 1967.
the learned magistrate acquitted the accused.
the attention of the high companyrt was number drawn to the proba tion of offenders act 1958 during the hearing of the a peal but subsequent to the delivery of the judgment an application was filed under s. 561 a cr.
the respondent did number appear.
3 ananda who was present and who seems to be an independent witness.
the high companyrt accepted the appeal and companyvicted the appellant lala ram under s. 324 i.p.c.
the respondent however made a second attack and inflicted an injury on the left shoulder of hari ram.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by sikri j. hari ram respondent filed a companyplaint against lala ram appellant alleging that lala ram had attacked him with a kassi on june 10 1964 at about 6 p.m. poonaram who was standing there prevented the blow from falling on hari ram by receiving it on his hand.
d. sharma for the appellant.
