Since the patient was bleeding and in spite of packing of leakages, the relatives of the patient took discharge from the Kurji Holy Family Hospital at about 2.00 PM on 13.11.1995.
Extraction of R.W. Operative Findings Numerous R.W. in the small gut with yellowish companylection of fluid in the peritoneal cavity.
mm, the Operating Surgeon was medically negligent in operating patient when the platelets companynt was so low.
2,00,000/ by the Opposite Party No.3 Operating Surgeon with 6 percent simple interest, apart from Rs.
Initially, the Appellant had taken his son to a physician Dr. Arun Tiwari on 08.11.1995 who advised some Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by CHETAN KUMAR Date 2019.05.10 tests and medicines.
The wound was closed in layers.
There was another test companyducted before surgery, showing platelets companynt as 35000 per cu.
Dr. Hare Ram Singh opined that Bleeding Time BT was 3 00 against numbermal value of 2 4 seconds and Clotting Time CT was 5 00 against numbermal value of 3 6 seconds.
3 Respondent No.
They were companylected at one place and extracted out by making a nick in the gut.
Thus, the opposite party was found negligent in carrying out surgery.
He was taken to the Hospital at about 8.00 PM.
Sanjay Kumar aged about 15 years, son of the Appellant companyplained of abdominal pain, fever and haemorrhage in both eyes.
After 180549 IST Reason 1 NCDRC 2 SCDRC examining the blood report, Dr. Arun Tiwari referred the patient to the Kurji Holy Family Hospital original Opposite Party No.
Procedure The abdomen was opened by midline incision above and below the umbilicus.
The second test which was higher than the numbermal bleeding and clotting time was companyducted at 7.30 AM on 11.11.1995 pg.
32,000/ as expenditure incurred in medical treatment and the litigation companyts of Rs.
23 of paper book which was quite low.
In companysumer companyplaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 3, the Appellant produced an affidavit of Dr. Hare Ram Singh, then posted in Jharkhand State Assembly at Russian Hostel, Dhurwa, P.S. Jaganathpur, District Ranchi.
On the same date, the patient was admitted to Patna Medical College and Hospital PMCH where the patient died on 16.11.1995.
However, since the platelets companynt was 35000 per cu.mm against numbermal range of 1.5 lakhs to 4 lakhs per cu.
The peritoneal cavity was found to companytain yellowish fluid a small amount of which was companylected and sent for c s biomedical examination.
24 of paper book .
In appeal by the Operating Surgeon, the amount of companypensation awarded against Operating Surgeon was set aside by NCDRC.
The affidavit further states that there was a second test which shows that the platelets decreased excessively and there were very few plasma cells present.
4,00,000/ as companypensation to be paid by the Kurji Holy Family Hospital Opposite Party No.1 and Rs.
Another test was companyducted at 9.00 AM on 11.11.1995 pg.
1 herein was absolved of the damages of Rs.
After admission as per the affidavit of Dr. Hare Ram Singh, the first BT and CT test were done at about 8.55 pm pg.
25,000/ .
2,00,000/ imposed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission 2 vide order dated 12.11.2014.
The recorded history of the patient is as under A 15 years old male patient is admitted in 3A 7 with the companyplaints of fever, pain abdomen and hemorrhage from both eyes since 5 days.
He was advised to companysult with the specialist as well.
A rubber companyrugated drain was placed in the peritoneal cavity.
1 on 10.11.1995.
The patient was operated upon on 11.11.1995 when the platelets companynt was 35000 per cubic millimeter cu.mm at about 11.15 AM.
Dr. Hare Ram Singh was of the opinion that to operate the patient with excessive low platelets companynt was the greatest blunder and clear case of extreme negligence of doctors.
Before the surgery, the patient was transfused with two units of blood and after the surgery another two units of blood were transfused.
The SCDRC awarded a sum of Rs.
Learned SCDRC found that the patient was haemophilic and number peritonitis as diagnosed by the Respondents.
The abdomen was closed in one layer by vieryl.
skin was left open.
Hemant Gupta, J. The challenge in the present appeal is to an order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission 1 on 02.11.2015 whereby the original Opposite Party No.
3 1986 Act The surgery was performed on 11.11.1995 at about 11.15 AM.
The small gut was found to companytain many round worms.
The post operative numbere of the operating team reads as under Name s of Operation s Exp.
