These pamphlets related to Jatav Sammelans which were held in certain places in tehsil Datia etc.
18 of 1967.
On September 25, 1956 the Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes Orders Amendment Act 1956 received the assent of the President.
Among the other castes Chamar was mentioned.
As mentioned earlier it was stated in Exh.
In other words in Vindhya Pradesh in entry 3 apart from Chamar, Ahirwar, Chamar Mangam, Mochi or Raidas were included.
as the ,caste of the persons belonging to the Jatav companymunity.
The name of the person who is shown as having seconded this resolution which was proposed by one Lalu Ram Jatav is that of the returned candidate.
2237 of 1969 .
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Grover, J. These are two cross, ,appeals from a judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court.
P. 18 that the returned candidate who was described as the Secretary of the Jatav Sabha, Datia was also expected to attend that Sammelan.
That issue was as follows 1 a Whether respondent No.
P. 16 the returned candidate was shown as one of the companyveners in Exh.
In Exh.
K. Sen, G. L. Sanghi and K. P. Gupta, for respondent No.
The appellant obtained 24,549 votes whereas respondent No.
in item 9 Jatav was included in the entry beginning with Chamar.
P. 18 it was mentioned that the returned candidate, who was the Mantri Secretary of the Jatav Sabha Datia was also expected to attend the Jatav Sammelan Barchouli in tehsil Bhander.
P. 17 he was shown as one of the companyveners.
This Bill was to provide for the inclusion in and exclusion from the list of scheduled castes and of scheduled tribes of certain castes and tribes.
Madhya Bharat and Vindhya Pradesh ceased to be.
As numbericed by the High Court the substance of these pamphlets Exhs.
However in several other districts Jatavs were number included and in particular in the districts which formerly formed part of Vindhya Pradesh including Datia.
A number of allegations were raised in the election petition and as many as 12 issues were framed with a number of sub issues.
One of the grievances which was brought to the numberice of the Collector was that some of the officers and the clerical staff did number record the caste of Jatav companymunity as Jatav even though the members of the said companymunity told them that their caste was Jatav.
Rameshwar Nath, for the appellant in C.A. No.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeals Nos.
P. 16, P. 17 and P. 18 which were printed and published.
There were other similar documents i.e. Exh.
2237 of 1969 .
The last date for filing the numberination papers was January 20, 1967, the date of scrutiny was January 21, 1967.
1 Shri Kishorilal belongs to the Jatav caste as alleged by the petitioner.
The substance of which was that a big Sammelan of the Jatav companymunity and other depressed classes would be held on January 26, 1960 at Mouza Barchouli in which various difficulties which were being experienced by the Jatav companymunity would be companysidered.
The Collector had issued an order to all his subordinates to record Jatav.
Madhya Bharat Chamar, Bairwa, Bhambi, Jatav.
Another document Exh.
P. 55 which was a personal bond and the security bond Exh.
2123 of 1969 and respondent No.
2123 of 1969 and the appellant in C.A. No.
1 were negatived with the exception of issue No.
2123/69 which arises from an election petition filed by the respondent Rajaram Singh an unsuccessful candidate in the High Court under s. 81 of the Representation of People Act 1951, hereinafter called the Act, challenging the election of the appellant who was declared duly elected in February 1967 from the Bhander Assembly Constituency of the State of Madhya Pradesh a seat which was reserved for a scheduled caste candidate.
P. 16 and P. 17 was that a deputation companysisting of the representatives of the Provincial Jatav Sabha under the leadership of Atamdas President of that Sabha waited upon the Collector of Datia district on January 12, 1961.
In Exh.
2123 and 2237 of 1969.
1 in C.A. No.
The pool took place on February 20, 1967.
In the district of Bhind etc.
The result of the election was declared on February 21, 1967.
1 in C.A. No.
1 obtained 8096 votes.
On all the issues the allegations of respondent No.
By these pamphlets Jatavs were advised to record their true caste i.e. Jatav in the Census operations which were to companymence in February 1961.
p. 18 was a pamphlet.
Appeals under S. 116 A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 from the judgment and, order dated August 29, 1965 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench in Election Petition No.
Certain criminal proceedings were started against the returned candidate in 1964.
341 of the Constitution soon after it came into force Jatavs were number shown among the scheduled castes in Madhya Pradesh and Madhya Bharat.
The entries proposed which are relevant for our purposes in the then three States of Madhya Pradesh, Madhya Bharat and Vindhya Pradesh were as follows Madhya Pradesh Chamar, Chamari, Mochi, Nona, Rohidas, Ramnami Satnami, Surjyabanshi or Surjyaramnami.
P. 60 which was a resolution passed at a Jatav Sammelan held at Tharet on October 24, 1963 showed that a demand had been made that scholarships should be given to the students belonging to the Jatav companymunity exactly in the same manner as such scholarships were being awarded to students belonging to the scheduled castes.
