Since the appellant refused to do so, on April 18, 1989, the respondent approached the District Court at Bharatpur, Rajasthan and obtained an ex parte ad interim mandatory injunction on 22nd April, 1989 directing the appellant to release the goods within two days on payment of the sum of Rs.
Pursuant to the Order passed by this Court on September 5, 1994 the appellant had taken substituted service, and served respondents by publishing Court Notice in Hindustan Times Newspaper, New Delhi, Monday dated 19th September, 1994 Annexure B at page 115.
2,26,674.00 Two lacs twenty six thousand, six hundred and seventy four only being made while the respondent was due in a sum of Rs.
He made a representation on March 27, 1989 requesting the appellants to waive the port charges and release the goods.
3 shed, Netaji Subhas Docks of the appellants between October 11 to 17, 1988.
The respondent had companysignment of Rolling Mills in 63 cases, imported at the Port of Calcutta in October 1988 and got unloaded at No.
1 was required to obtain delivery of the goods as per the prescribed Scale of Rates but he failed to have them cleared after making payment of demurrage.
This appeal by special leave arises from the order of Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court dated 7.2.1994 made in Civil Appeal Writ No.
The order passed by the District Court, Bharatpur in the suit filed by the respondent, is without jurisdiction and is void.
409 of 1992.
Under s.20 CPC the only companyrt companypetent to take companynizance of the action is the appropriate companyrt at Calcutta.
Leave granted.
7,37,400/ to the appellant.
The appellants office is at Calcutta.
The respondent No.
