The appellants were employees of respondent No.1 hereinafter referred to as the employer .
They were paid the amounts required to be paid under the scheme.
143 persons including the present appellants raised a dispute on two issues one relating to the age of retirement and the other relating to monetary benefits.
Subsequently, a settlement was arrived at between the management and the workmen through the registered Union on 13.10.1995.
A voluntary retirement scheme was floated by the employer on 26.5.1995.
Undisputedly, appellants and 125 others opted to be companyered by the scheme.
The companytroversy lies within a very narrow companypass.
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing the Letters Patent Appeal filed by the appellants questioning the legality of the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition.
