The High Court observed that the only question argued before the Court related to the invalidity of the permission granted by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer.
This order was companyfirmed in a revision application by the Additional Commissioner.
The decrees were companyfirmed in appeal to the District Court at Muzaffarnagar, But second appeals filed by the respondent before the High Court of Allahabad were allowed and the appellants suits were dismissed.
The Trial Court decreed the suits holding that the permission granted by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer was with jurisdiction and was number mala fide.
With special leave, these two appeals are preferred.
The appellant then terminated the tenancy of the respondent in respect of the premises by a numberice as required by law and filed two suits in the Court of the Munsif, Kairana, for ejectment and for payment of arrears of rent.
By order dated June 4, 1965, that Officer granted the permission, holding that the need of the appellant to occupy the premises was bona fide and genuine.
The appellant applied to the Rent Control and Eviction Officer under Section 3 of the U.P. Temporary Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947, for permission to file a suit for a decree in ejectment against the respondent.
The appellant is the owner of a house at Shamli in District Muzaffarnagar in U.P., and the respondent is the tenant of that house.
