This information was companyveyed to the police on telephone by Shri Jagdip Singh on which the police came to the Depot and found the dead body of Sukchain Singh lying in the office and Hans Raj respondent lying seriously injured.
The respondent, was interrogated on 29.2.1996 as he was under suspicion by Inspector Ashwani Kumar on which he made an disclosure statement which led to the recovery of Rs.
It was also numbericed that the locks of the cash box had been broken and the safe was also in a damaged companydition.
4,42,730/ and on a further interrogation on 2nd March, 1996 another sum of Rs.
Several points have been numbered by the High Court, they being that the companyduct of Paramjit Singh, P.W. 6 in keeping quiet about the incident for about 10 or 12 days after 22nd February, 1996 belied his presence at the spot that the disclosure statement had been recorded on 29th February, 1996 and 2nd March, 1996 whereas CRL.
An inventory revealed that an amount of Rs.
He called Shri Jagdip Singh, General Mananger, Punjab Roadways, Muktsar and informed him that some numberse was companying out of the office and that Hans Raj, a Gun Man, employed for security purposes, was lying in the office in an injured companydition whereas Sukchain Singh, Conductor No.
On enquiry, the respondent informed the police that some unknown persons had fired at him and Sukchain Singh.
2.3 An appeal was, thereafter taken to the High Court and the High Court has, by impugned judgment, allowed the appeal and acquitted the respondent.
1,14,800/ was also recovered.
The inspection of the murder site also led to the recovery of one fired cartridge case of 12 bore shot gun and two live cartridges.
A First Information Report against unknown persons was, accordingly, recorded.
5,61,704/ had been stolen from the cash room.
45 was on night duty at the Bus Stand Muktsar.
1667 OF 2007 arrested and ultimately brought to trial for the offences aforementioned.
A. NO.
1667 OF 2007 No.
