5/ and 50 companyonut leaves as purappadu rent Though the said Rayiru Kurup mentioned the names of his sisters as companyassignees.
However.
The appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed on 2.12.1963.
they were number parties to the said kuzhikanam deed.
Accordingly.
A preliminary decree in that suit was passed on 14.11.1960 expressly rejecting a claim put forward by the present appellant of his tenancy rights in the suit property.
On 16.12.1967, a final decree came to be passed.
C 4 Plan filed in the suit .
they being brother and sisters.
The appellant herein preferred a further Second Appeal No.
Thereafter, the plaintiffs in the suit filed a petition for passing final decree.
The first Appellate Court allowed that application.
After remand, the trial companyrt by judgment dated 17.11.1977 upheld the claim of the appellant under Section 7B in respect of the plots A, B and C in the Ext.
Taking advantage of that, the appellant moved the learned Sub Judge in the pending appeal to grant him leave to file additional ground on the basis of Sections 7 and 78 of the Kerala Act l of 1964 as amended by Act 35 of l969.
the appellant preferred A.S. 335/67 before the subordinate companyrt.
Against that final decree.
The plaintiffs respondents Nos 4 to 31 herein preferred a Revision to the Kerala Hight Court against the order of the trial companyrt and the High Court by order dated 28.5.1982 upset the trial companyrts order and rejected the claim of the appellant under Section 7B of the Kerala Land Reforms Act in respect of the plots A, B and It is under these circumstances, the present appeal is preferred by the appellant.
filed a suit No.
was in possession on 1.1.1970 of the land over which he claimed tenancy rights.
The said Rayiru Kurup purported to have executed a registered deed of kuzhikanam lease dated 25.5.1946 in favour of his son by name Appu Kurup appellant herein , stipulating a sum of Rs.
1074/71 before the High Court of Kerala.
being respondents 4 3l herein.
The High Court remanded the matter to the trial companyrt to find out factually whether the appellant herein who was the first defendant in the suit.
642/58 on 26.5.1958 for partition of their l/3rd share in the suit land with their share of future mesne profits ignoring the lease kuzhikanam above mentioned.
l969 came into force with effect from 1.1.1970.
Kerala Land Reforms Amendment Act.
The legal heirs of Chiruthai one of the assignees .
When the appeal was pending.
VENKATASWAMI, J. The undisputed facts are the following The suit land was assigned under an assignment deed dated 5.6.1897 by one Nambra Kurup in favour of one Rayiru Kurup, Madhavi Amma and Chiruthayi Amma.
