The Judgment of Das C. J. Venkatarama Aiyar, S. K. Das and Sarkar JJ.
March 24.
She applied twice and, as all the companyfort she got was a letter saying that her claim was being examined, she seems to have taken the law into her own hands, entered the forests and started cutting the trees or so the Divisional Forest Officer says.
Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution for the enforcement of fundamental rights.
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Petition No.
V. S. Mani, for the petitioner.
was delivered by Das C. J. Bose J. delivered a separate Judgment.
The Divisional Forest Officer thereupon took action against her for unlawful cutting and directed that her name be cancelled and that the cut materials be forfeited.
N. Keshwani, for I. N. Shroff, for respondent No.
Then, as numberhing tangible happened, she made a petition to this Court under Art.
N. Sanyal, Additional Solicitor General of India, R. Ganapathy Iyer and R. H. Dhebar for respondents, Nos.
Because of this, the petitioner went up to the Government of Madhya Pradesh and made an application dated September 27, 1956, asking that the Divisional Forest Officer be directed to give the petitioner immediate possession and number to interfere with her rights.
104 of 1957.
She thereupon went to the Divisional Forest Officer at Bhandara and asked for permission to work the forests in accordance with the above order.
This was on March 19, 1956.
The nature of the rights claimed by the petitioner has to be ascertained on a proper interpretation of the aforesaid document.
