The challenge to the public numberice dated 11 11 1983 by the appellants in the High Court was based mainly on the doctrine of promissory estoppel which has been rejected by the High Court.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S. VERMA, J. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions.
A similar challenge on the ground of promissory estoppel has been rejected by this Court in Kasinka Trading v. Union of India1.
That writ petition having been dismissed, this appeal has been filed by special leave.
The appellants filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the amendment made by the public numberice dated 11 11 1983.
