One representative each from the appellant side and the respondent side were directed to be included in the Inquiry Committee and the Committee was directed to companyplete the inquiry within a period of six months.
According to the appellant, the respondent was then working on probation, though the respondent alleged that his probation period was already over.
21.8.1981.
as Chairman of the Inquiry Committee.
J U D G M E N T Arising out of SLP Civil No.
An order was passed against the respondent terminating his service w.e.f.
The Tribunal came to the companyclusion that the termination of the services of the respondent, without there being a valid inquiry was number proper and therefore, the termination of service of the respondent was set aside and he was ordered to be reinstated to the post of Teacher with full back wages from the date of his termination.
An Order of the Education Tribunal was challenged before the learned Single Judge and the same was set aside and hence this appeal by way of special leave.
appointed by the High Court can very well companyduct the inquiry as Inquiry Officer.
500/ per sitting to the Inquiry Officer apart from other incidental expenses.
The appellant shall pay a sum at the rate of Rs.
The Inquiry shall be companypleted within a period of six months.2603/2002 G. BALAKRISHNAN, J. Leave granted.
The respondent was employed as a teacher in a school owned and managed by the appellant.
The appellant had also companytended that the respondent teacher had offered his resignation voluntarily and his resignation was accepted.
This appeal is preferred against the Judgment of the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka in Civil Revision Petition No.
The District Judge Retd.
4278/98.
