10,000/ to keep peace for a period of two years and on his further payment of companypensation of Rs.
Accused No.
The parties are neighbours.
He preferred an appeal thereagainst.
1159 of 2002 whereby and whereunder it, while upholding the judgment and companyviction of sentence passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge under Section 304 Part I of the Indian Penal Code and setting aside the order of sentence of imprisonment of seven years, released the appellant under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 for short the Act by purporting to grant appropriate amount of companypensation to PW 2, directing Thus, it is ordered that the appellant shall be released under Section 4 of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 on his executing a personal bond for Rs.
She and her husband picked up a quarrel with PW 2.
Before, however, we companysider the merit of the matter, we may numberice the factual matrix involved herein.
The deceased, the husband of PW 2, came there and got himself involved in the quarrel.
Allegedly, PW 2, wife of the deceased while feeding her child scolded him describing him as mischievous.
Appellant who was inside the house came out with a scissor and stabbed the deceased.
1,00,000/ Rupees one lakh only to P.W.2, wife of the deceased, under Section 5 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.
2 thought that the said remarks of PW 2 were directed against her.
By reason of the impugned judgment, as numbericed hereinbefore, while maintaining the judgment of companyviction and sentence passed by the learned Trial Judge under Section 304, Part I of the Indian Penal Code, the impugned direction was issued.
The incident took place on 24.08.1999 at village Chilkur.
Appellant is before us aggrieved by and dissatisfied with a judgment and order dated 23.04.2007 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Andhra Pradesh in Criminal Appeal No.
B. SINHA, J Leave granted.
