2 3 respectively in these suits, and companysidering that it should companyclusively be determined as to who the companyrect defendants are, they are necessary parties to both specific performance suits.
This arises out of I.As that have been filed by two other Charanjeet Singh Rekhis, one belonging to Moradabad and the other belonging to Signature Not Verified Uttarakhand, stating that each one of them are Defendant Digitally signed by R NATARAJAN Date 2018.11.22 165801 IST Reason Nos.
In an appeal filed to the Division Bench, this judgment was reversed stating It is companytended that the appellants are number parties to the companytract and therefore, are number necessary parties in a suit for specific performance of the companytract.
Both the I.As were, therefore, dismissed.
28958 28960/2014 are persons who do number purport to be who they say they are.
1 2 in SLP C Nos.
F. Nariman, J. Leave granted.
1 2 and Defendant Nos.
In both these cases, suits for specific performance have been filed.
32725 32726 of 2014 and Defendant Nos.
