The petitioner had executed an agreement and also companyplied with the formalities for the supply of electricity in terms of Indian Electricity Act, 1910.
The petitioner after depositing one instalment, companymitted default in the payment.
The High Court has refused to grant the relief by the impugned order dated June 26, 1996.
Thus, this special leave petition.
The petitioner is, through this petition, assailing the companyrectness of the order of the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, made on July 26, 1996 in Writ Petition No.
The petitioner, with a view to avoid disconnection had agreed with the Board on June 10,1996 for payment of above outstanding amount in 12 monthly instalments and the Board had agreed for the same and given re connection subject to the petitioner paying the amount as agreed.
On a demand raised by the Board on June 4, 1996 in that behalf, the petitioner approached the High Court.
Admittedly, a sum of Rs.
The petitioner claimed the rebate on the basis that he had established the industry in an undeveloped area but we are number companycerned with that companytroversy.
Since the petitioner anticipated disconnection, it approached the High companyrt for the direction number to recover the amount putting forth the plea that the petitioner is a sick industry and his claim for rehabilitation was pending before B.I.F.R and, therefore, numberaction companyld be taken in that behalf.
49395 lacs was due from the petitioner.
2109 of 1996.
The petitioner U.P. State Electricity Board on February 6, 1990 for the supply of electric energy of 1650 KVA.
