The respondent had approached the High Court with the grievance against number consideration of his case for promotion to the post of Chief Engineer Level II which according to him was based on the downgraded entries made by the Reviewing Officer which were accepted by the Accepting Officers in his ACR.
The respondents are directed to companysider the petitioner for promotion to the post of Chief Engineer Level II ignoring the impugned order dated 2.5.2000 and the impugned downgrading entries given by the Reviewing Officer and Accepting Officer.
No order as to companyts.
He prayed for quashing such downgraded entries and for fresh companysideration of his case for promotion.
The main ground on which he challenged the downgraded entries was that the Reviewing Officer and or Accepting Officer had number stated any reason justification for downgrading the entries given by the Reporting officer which were either very good or excellent or outstanding.
The gist of the case of the appellant is that the judgment of the High Court and the directions issued thereunder are against the Government orders issued from time to time regarding the manner of assessment of performance of the officers for the purpose of giving grading in the Annual Confidential Report ACR , regarding disposal of representations against adverse grading in such Report and regarding companysideration of eligible candidates for promotion from the grade of Superintendent Engineer to Chief Engineer Level II.
The State of Uttar Pradesh has filed this appeal assailing the judgment of the Allahabad High Court allowing the writ petition filed by the respondent on the terms and in the manner quoted hereunder In the circumstances the writ petition is allowed and the impugned order dated 2.5.2000 as well as the impugned downgrading entries are quashed .
P.MOHAPATRA,J. Leave granted.
