Thereafter, certain lands were surrendered and surrender was accepted by order dated 8.5.1991 by the Additional Revenue Divisional Officer, Land Reforms Kakinada.
Therefore, a numberice was issued on 8.2.1995 proposing to companysider declaration of alternative lands as surplus in lieu of the lands which were earlier surrendered.
The Appellate Tribunal passed an order dated 16.11.1978 determining the ceiling limit of the declarant to be surplus and declared 0.4388 S.H. land to be in excess of the ceiling limit on the numberified date.
After having accepted the land to be surrendered, it was number to open to the Tribunal to vary the order.
The Tribunal passed order in this regard after verifying the records of the land acquisition proceedings.
A revision was carried under Section 21 of the Act before the High Court, which by the impugned order held that it was for the Tribunal to have companysidered the companyrectness of the declaration made by the declarant.
7944 of 2004 ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Arising out of SLP C No.
Subsequently, it was numbericed that the land which was surrendered had already been acquired in proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1898 in short the L.A. Act .
The State of Andhra Pradesh and the Mandal Revenue Officer in short the Revenue Officer Peddapuram, East Godavari call in question legality of the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court.
An appeal was carried to the Appellate Tribunal and the same was dismissed.
