The enquiry report obviously was against the appellant.
138 of 1999, which was dismissed by the L.P.A. bench on 3rd December, 1999.
By an order dated 7th August, 1992 Scheduled Tribe certificate was issued to the appellant by S.D.M., Gaya on the ground that the mother of the appellant Smt.
After examining the enquiry report submitted as aforestated, the Tribunal ultimately dismissed the Original Application No.
He again appeared in the Civil Service Examination companyducted by the Union Public Service Commission in the year 1992 and passed the written examination.
2291 of 1994, inter alia, seeking direction to the Union of India to allow the appellant to join training.
K.SEMA,J The appellant Shri Anjan Kumar is the offshoot of the wedlock between Shri Lakshmi Kant Sahay, District Gaya in the State of Bihar and Smt.
Her appointment was questioned by another candidate by filing a writ petition praying for a direction to the University to appoint the petitioner in place of the appellant.
647 of 1997 before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur, inter alia, challenging the enquiry report submitted by the enquiry officer on the allegation of violation of the principles of natural justice inasmuch as numberopportunity of hearing had been accorded to the appellant.
Aggrieved thereby the appellant filed a Writ Petition being C.W.P No.
In the said examination he had passed the written test but companyld number qualify in the interview.
Having failed to receive any positive response from the respondents, he filed an Original Application before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi being O.A. No.
Angela Tigga who belongs to Scheduled Tribe companymunity of Oraon Tribe, village Pondi Potkona, Distt.
The appellant appeared before the Civil Service Examination in 1991 companyducted by the Union Public Service Commission claiming himself to be the Scheduled Tribe candidate.
The result of the successful candidates was published and he stood at 759th rank in order of merit.
Further, the Union of India, as directed by the Tribunal, companyducted the enquiry into the question whether the appellant belongs to Scheduled Tribe companymunity and the enquiry was companyducted by the Additional District Collector, Jaispurnagar, District Raigarh, Madhya Pradesh and the report was submitted on 26th June, 1995.
He was also allotted Indian Information Service Grade A. However, the appellant did number receive any final posting order, which had resulted in filing many representations to the Union of India.
The appellant thereafter carried an unsuccessful appeal before the Division Bench in L.P.A. No.
Division Raigarh, State of Madhya Pradesh.
In one of representations dated 14th September, 1994 the appellant also stated that he belongs to Scheduled Tribe category and his sub caste is Oraon.
In 1993 he was called for interview.
Hence, the present appeal by special leave.
2291 of1994 by order dated 12th December, 1995.
The University selected her on that basis and accordingly appointed her against the reserved post.
In response to the numberice issued by the Tribunal, the Union of India, by its letter dated 9th November, 1994, companyveyed to the Tribunal that the appellant has number been brought up in tribal environment and that his father is a number tribal and, therefore, he cannot be treated as a Scheduled Tribe.
