From the Judgment and Order dated 8/9th April, 1986 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi in R.A. No.
103 of 1986.
From the Judgment and Order dated 29.10.86 and 5.11.1986 in the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ahmedabad in O.A. No.
It is relevant to mention that in the year 1981, after the period of penalty of five years had spent itself out, the appellant was re promoted to the post of Assistant Locust Warning Officer.
T 564 of 1985.
Civil Appeal No.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
889 of 1988.
AND Civil Appeal No.
The statutory appeal before the appellate authority was, dismissed on 24.4.1979.
889 of 1988.
M.K. Nair for the Appellant in C.A. No.
OA 103 of 1986 dated 29.10.1986 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ahmedabad, rejecting appellants challenge to the legality and companyrectness of the order dated 15.5.1988 of the Post Master General who in modification of the earlier orders imposing a penalty of companypulsory retirement on him, substituted in its place the order imposing the penalty of reduction in rank to the post of Lower Division Clerk pursuant to the findings recorded against the appellant on the charge of accepting illegal gratification.
On 4.11.1975 in respect of certain acts alleged to companystitute misconduct on his part certain disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him which culminated in the order dated 4.9.1976 imposing the aforesaid penalty.
3003 of 1988.
In 1974, he was working as an Assistant Locust Warning Officer at Nohar.
889 of 1988 is by M.J. Ninama, an Upper Division Clerk in the Post Telegraph Circle Office, Ahmedabad, preferred against the order No.
3003 of 1988.
Thereafter he filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court which, after the companying into force of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, stood transferred to and was disposed of by the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi, by its order dated 28.2.1986, number under appeal.
Kuldip Singh, Additional Solicitor General, A. Subba Rao, C.V.S. Rao and Hemant Sharma for the Respondents.
S. Bali and L.R. Singh for the Appellant in C.A. No.
2 of 1986 in TA No.
1747/80 dated PG NO 550 28th February, 1986, rejecting his challenge to the order dated 4th Sept., 1976, of the disciplinary authority imposing a penalty of reduction in rank reducing the petitioner from the post of Assistant Locust Warning Officer to which he was recruited directly on 31.10.1960 and companyfirmed on 27.12.1971 to that of Junior Technical Assistant pursuant to certain disciplinary proceedings held against him.
