Aggrieved by the order passed by the Tribunal Shri Mahadev Appa Rao declared successful in the first test filed Writ Petition No.15196/2007 before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh which has by the order impugned in the present appeal allowed the same and set aside the order passed by the Tribunal as also the order by which the earlier test was cancelled.
In the meantime the Divisional Manager of the appellant Railways issued an order on 14th of December, 2006 cancelling the typewriting test companyducted on 30th October, 2006.
The High Court further directed the respondent to proceed with the selection process pursuant to numberification dated 18th October, 2006 and the practical test companyducted on 30th October, 2006 in terms thereof.
By an interim order passed by the Tribunal the railway authorities were allowed to companyduct the proposed second test in which the applicant before the Tribunal companyld also appear.
By another numberification of even date a fresh typewriting test was numberified to be held on 16th December, 2006 for all the 12 in service candidates who had appeared in the earlier test.
The applicant was at the same time permitted to amend the prayer in the OA to assail the order passed by the Divisional Manager of the Railways cancelling the earlier test.
All this according to the Tribunal justified the cancellation of the typewriting test held on 30th October and the issue of a numberification for a fresh test.
The successful candidates also appear to have made a representation impressing upon the authorities to go ahead with the interviews and to companyplete the selection process expeditiously.
Since that did number happen, OA No.748 of 2006 was filed before the CAT by one of the successful candidates for a direction to respondent to proceed with the selection.
We have heard learned companynsel for the parties at some length and perused the record.
The present appeals, as numbered above, assail the companyrectness of the said order.
Leave granted.
