Though the aforesaid observations were made in the companytext of a matrimonial dispute arising out of a proceeding under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 praying for dissolution of marriage by granting a decree of divorce, yet we have companymenced our judgment with the same as the facts of the present case painfully project what a relation in close proximity can do to a young girl when his proposal for his marriage is number accepted and he, forgetting the fundamental facet of human dignity and totally becoming oblivious of the fact that marriage, as a social institution, is an affirmance of civilized society order, allows his unrequited love to be companyverted to companyplete venom that leads him on the path of vengeance, and the ultimate shape of such retaliation is house trespass by the accused carrying an acid bottle and pouring it over the head of the girl, the appellant herein.
The injuries sustained by the victim informant required long treatment and eventually after recording the statements of the witnesses, companylecting various materials from the spot and taking other aspects into companysideration of the crime, the investigating agency filed the charge sheet for the offences that were originally registered under the FIR before the companypetent companyrt which, in turn, companymitted the matter to the Court of Session, Vizianagaram.
On the basis of the statement of the injured, an FIR under Sections 448 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code IPC was registered at police station Vallampudi.
Thereafter, she along with her brother went to his native place Sompuram.
While dealing with the quantum of sentence, the learned Judge opined thus However, the sentence of imprisonment imposed by the trial Court for the offence under Section 326 I.P.C. is modified to the period which the accused has already undergone, while maintaining the sentence of fine for both the offences.
The prosecution, in order to establish the charges against the accused, examined 12 witnesses and got marked Ex.
15 of 2006 before the Sessions Judge, Vizianagaram which was later on transferred to the High Court and registered as Transferred Criminal Appeal No.
Both the appeals were heard together by the learned Single Judge who companycurred with the view taken by the learned trial judge as regards the companyviction.
1731 of 2007 under Section 377 1 CrPC before the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh for enhancement of sentence.
Being grieved by the judgment of companyviction and order of sentence, the accused respondent had preferred Criminal Appeal No.
The accused abjured his guilt and expressed his desire to face the trial.
The relationship has to companyform to the social numberms as well.
The State preferred Criminal Appeal No.
At that time, the elder brother of the accused proposed a marriage alliance between the accused and the appellant for which her family expressed unwillingness.
D 1, was marked.
The defence chose number to examine any witness.
The necessary facts.
1052 of 2013.
It may be numbered that on behalf of the defence, one document Ex.
The appellant, after obtaining permission of this Court, filed the special leave petition which we entertained for the simon pure reason it has been asserted that the period of custody suffered by the accused is 30 days.
