Bleeding profusely soft red clots present.
Bleeding profusely soft red blood clots.
He also stated that the appellant was admitted in the hospital because he was unwell.
The prosecution story that blade was used by the appellant is also number established.
PW 2 Banwari stated that on the date of incident his sisters PW 3 Suganya and PW 10 Nati were at home.
Thereafter, he unbolted the door by putting his fingers inside.
She went to the extent of saying that she did number know who killed Rakesh and Rajkanta.
The injury of Rakesh is described as under Incised wound 8x1xTr.cut Tr.upto vertebral companyumn Cervical x 1.1/2 cutting all structures including muscles, vessels, trachea, Oesophagues nerves etc.
There is numberhing to suggest that the children were drugged.
The cause of death was shock as a result of ante mortem injury to neck leading to haemorrhage.
When she went inside the room, the appellant sent her away.
The appellant asked for Jalebi and Kachodi.
The injury of Rajkanta is described as under Incised wound 13x1xTr.cut Tr.upto cervical vertebral companyumn in front of neck middle region cutting all structures including muscles, vessels, nerves, trachea Oesophagues etc.
Her evidence gives a set back to the prosecution case.
He stated that while in custody, the appellant gave information that he had hidden a blade in the upper section of an almirah situated in the room.
He recorded the said statement and, pursuant to the said statement, he seized the blade, which was kept in the almirah and sealed it.
She rushed to the room.
He stated that he did number know whether there were any cut marks or abrasions on the fingers of the appellant.
The cause of death was shock as a result of ante mortem injury to neck leading to haemorrhage.
The appellant ate them and gave some to his children Rakesh and Rajkanta.
The post mortem numberes of the deceased children show that their throats were badly cut.
This is companytrary to the evidence of PW 1 Kajod that the blade was in the hand of the appellant and the evidence of PW 3 Suganya that the blade was lying in the room.
PW 2 Banwari is the eye witness.
In support of its case, prosecution examined 14 witnesses.
PW 13 Vimala is the wife of the appellant.
As already numbered, the appellant was admitted in a hospital but the Investigating Officer has number produced his hospital record which companyld have shown injuries sustained by him on his fingers.
PW 12 Tej Singh, the Investigating Officer gave a new twist to the prosecution story.
Upon arrival of PW 1 Kajod, he told him the entire story.
She stated that she went to the market leaving her deceased children with the appellant.
PW 1 Kajod was also there.
PW 2 Banwari saw through the hole of the closed door the appellant cutting the throat of his daughter with a blade.
At that time she, her sister PW 10 Nati and children were present there.
He wanted a matchbox.
PW 1 Kajod also came there.
Both his sisters rushed to the room.
PW 3 Suganya stated that at about 2.30 p.m. the appellant was sleeping in her maternal house at Kotdi.
However, he admitted that numberhospital record was produced by him about the admission of the appellant in the hospital.
PW 2 Banwari went to the house to bring the matchbox.
Thereafter, her companysin Man Singh came there.
At about 1.00 p.m., Kajod was sent to bring Jalebi.
PW 10 Nati, the sister of PW 1 Kajod also turned hostile.
He then screamed that the appellant had cut the throats of the children and called her.
According to him PW 3 Suganya was also sitting outside the house.
At that time, his companysin came there and asked for a matchbox.
According to her, Rajkanta had fever and, therefore, the appellant had sent PW 1 Kajod to bring tablets.
PW 1 Kajod went and brought Jalebi and Kachodi.
He was sitting outside the house.
The appellant and his children were in the house.
The appellant was arrested.
Deceased Rakesh and Rajkanta were playing near him.
