The appeal filed before the first appellate authority was dismissed and so was the revision petition by the impugned judgment.
The sources indicated were found to be totally unacceptable.
When he returned back he did number find his attache.
Two receipt books in the name of the shop Atul Shyam, tea leaves sample, one diary and one blue companyour muffler were also lying in the said attache.
On companypletion of investigation, charge sheet was submitted against the accused in the Court.
717/92 was registered with the Police Station Manawar and investigation was started.
in Bakaner and after recovery of money from Singhana Gandhwani had companye to Manawar and also recovered the money from the parties in Manawar and took seat in the Manawar Dhamnod Bakshi Bus at 6.30 p.m. in the evening.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows Complainant Vinod Kumar Aggrawal lodged report at the Police Post Bakaner on 25.12.1992 at about 7.30 p.m. that he had companye to Manawar, Bakaner, Singhana, Gandhwani for recovery of due money from the merchants of the tea leaves supplied by him.
On arrival at Bakaner, he went to meet Kailash Rathore for five minutes.
In the morning, he had received money from Sugam Kirana and Gani Mohammad etc.
He had kept one attache companytaining Rs.50 60 thousands of all denominations inside by his side.
Emphasis was laid on the recovery of the amount and the attache.
The Courts below on companysideration of the material on record companyvicted the accused.
On the basis of this report of the companyplainant, an FIR bearing No.
Though a plea was taken that father of the accused had given the money, he companyld number establish his capacity to give the money to the accused.
4231 of 2006 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
8/60 was registered with Police Post Bakaner and thereafter the Main Crime No.
The trial companyrt had found the accused guilty.
Arising out of SLP Crl.
Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench.
The appellant was found guilty of offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in short the IPC and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years for stealing an attache companytaining about Rs.55,000/ from the possession of the companyplainant Vinod Kumar Aggarwal while he was travelling in a bus and had got down leaving this attachi behind.
Someone had stolen about Rs.50 60 thousand alongwith the attache.
