We have heard the petition.
At several other places they are companytradictory.
The writ petition has been drafted in a careless manner.
Parasaran, Attorney General and Ms. A. Subhashini for the Respondents.
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition Civil No.
849 of 1987.
At several places the pleadings are meaningless.
Petitioner in person and M.S.Ganesh for the petitioner.
Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India .
The petitioner has left out numberinstitution from his attempt of mud slinging.
The allegations are clumsy and several irrelevant facts have been put into the petition to inflate its size.
The following order of the Court was delivered O R D E R This application has been filed by an Advocate of this Court by way of a public interest litigation.
It had been listed earlier and learned Attorney General had entered appearance on behalf of the Union of India.
