P.C. Sd T.K. Sangyal SP, CBI, SPE, ACB, Calcutta As would be apparent from the said G.D. Entry, the Superintendent of Police, C.B.I. discussed the matter with D.I.G., B.I., Calcutta but since there was numbertime for further verification into the matter, the Superintendent of Police, C.B.I. decided to leave for Nagpur by Gitanjali Express with a view to intercept the respondent and take further necessary action.
51 of 1990 under Section 13 2 read with Section 13 1 e of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
The matter was discussed with the DIG, CBI Calcutta and it was decided to verify the information by intercepting him enroute and to take other follow up actions, if necessary.
Consequently it also quashed the search and seizure effected on October 18, 1990 and directed that the money and articles seized be returned to the person from whom they were seized.
Since there is numbertime for further verification into the matter.
On the basis of the said report, R.C. Case No.
A huge amount of money was recovered pursuant to such search and the said amount alongwith other articles was seized.
It is number in dispute that on October 18, 1990 at 1130 hours the police party intercepted the respondent at Nagpur Railway Station and companyducted his personal search as well as the search of his belongings as also the search of his residential flat at Nagpur.
After returning to Calcutta on October 20, 1990 the Superintendent of Police, C.B.I. lodged a First Information Report alleging companymission of offences punishable under Section 13 2 read with Section 13 1 e of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
I am leaving for Nagpur for Geetanjali Express today 17.10.1990 scheduled to start from Howrah at 13.10 hrs.
In the said G.D. Entry it is stated that the Superintendent of Police, C.B.I. left with a team of C.B.I. officers and that the action was taken as per the provisions of Section 157 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
681 of October 17, 1990 and the First Information Report lodged by the Superintendent of Police, C.B.I. He also prayed for return of the money and other articles seized from him by the Superintendent of Police, C.B.I. on October 18, 1990.
51 of 1990 Calcutta was registered.
The brief facts of the case are as follows On October 17, 1990 the Superintendent of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation S.P.E. A.C.B. , Calcutta received information from reliable source on telephone that respondent, who was then Director Personnel , Eastern Coal Fields Limited, was a companyrupt officer in the habit of demanding and accepting illegal gratification, had demanded and accepted a sum of rupees one lakh which he was carrying with him while going to Nagpur by Gitanjali Express on October 17, 1990.
1913 of 1990 whereby the High Court while allowing the revision petition quashed the investigation on the basis of G.D. Entry No.
P. Singh, J. The Union of India, Superintendent of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation and other officers of the said Bureau have companye up in appeal against the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Calcutta dated February 28, 1992 in Criminal Revision No.
with a team of B.I. officers companyprising of Inspector, S.R. Majumdar, Inspector, R.K. Sarkar, Inspector, S.N. Bhattacharjee and Inspector S.K. Dasgupta, this is as per provision of Section 157 of the Cr.
