However, without passing a speaking and reasoned order, the High Court rejected the writ application in the following manner From a perusal of the record, it appears that there is inordinate and unexplained delay in filing the writ petition.
Against the aforesaid two orders, this Special Leave Petition has been filed which, on grant of leave, was heard in presence of the learned companynsel for the parties.
The Review Application was also dismissed by a Division Bench of the High Court on the ground that numberground was made out in the Review Application to review the order dated 27th of March, 2006.
Subsequent to the rejection of the Writ Application, a Review Application was filed for the purpose of reviewing the order dated 27th of March, 2006 rejecting the writ application on the ground of delay and latches.
A writ petition was filed by the appellant before the High Court of Judicature of Allahabad for directions to the respondents, State of U.P. and Ors.,
So far as the order dated 27th of March, 2006 is companycerned, we are of the view, on companysideration of the writ application, that in fact, there was numberinordinate delay in filing the writ application because the wrong date was mentioned in the writ petition which should be 10th of January, 2006, but the same was written as 10th of January, 2005.
By an order dated 27th of March, 2006, the High Court dismissed the writ application holding that there was an inordinate and unexplained delay in filing the Writ Petition.
Delay companydoned.
Leave granted.
to make companypensation at the market rates including interest in respect of the lands acquired by them.
