The members of the appellant society had number been given the galas though according to it all companyditions were fulfilled.
The statement of respondent No.5 present appellant that shifting shall be done to Gala P 49 to P 52 within a period of two weeks was really of number much relevance.
It appears that the learned companynsel appearing for the appellant Pune Society stated by way of an undertaking before the High Court that shifting to Gala P 49 to P 52 shall be done within a period of two weeks from the date of order.
The appeal then pending before STAT had numberhing to do with the issues involved.
5 before the High Court to the Gala would be without prejudice to the rights and companytentions in the appeal pending before the STAT.
They also prayed that the respondents be directed to implement the Resolution dated 4.2.2004 passed in a meeting under the Chairmanship of respondent No.1 RTA.
Even the basic grievances and respective stand have number been discussed.
P 49 to P 52 within a period of two weeks.
Direction was also given to ensure that the recommendation of the sub committee was implemented fully.
It is stated by learned companynsel for the appellant that Gala Nos.14 to 18 and A2 were to be first allotted by the Mahanagar Palika.
The High Court numbered the undertaking given by the Pune Taximens Consumer Co operative Society Ltd. in short the Pune Society , the present appellant to shift Gala Nos.
2207 of 2004 decided on 28.9.2004 by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court.
It was stated that the shifting of appellant Pune Society Respondent No.
Learned companynsel appearing for the Pune Society present appellant had submitted before the High Court that their appeal was pending before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal in short the STAT .
The High Courts order seems to be totally companyfusing.
Though the Brihan Mumbai Mahanagar Palika in short Mahanagar Palika was a party before the High Court, it is number clear as to whether the Gala number.
Learned companynsel for the appellant submitted that the High Court was totally companyfused about the issues and the reliefs sought for.
Respondent No.5, a Society registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926 in short the Act , and its members filed the writ petition for a direction to the respondents to implement recommendations made by the sub committee appointed by Regional Transport Authority in short the RTA Respondent No.1 .
The undertaking by learned companynsel appearing for respondent No.5 to act within a particular time was really, as numbered above, has numberrelevance The Gala Nos.
P 49 to P 52 were, according to appellant, to be given by the Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporation.
Arising out of SLP C No.21367 of 2004 ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
P 49 to P 52 have been handed over.
By the impugned order, the High Court directed the STAT to dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible preferably within three months from the date of order.
On 25.10.2004 on the basis of the statement made by learned companynsel appearing for the appellant, it was observed that the question as to what would happen when Gala was made available to the appellant shall be companysidered in this appeal.
Appellant calls in question legality of the judgment in writ petition No.
It directed the RTA to ensure that Resolution No.15 dated 4.2.2004 is fully implemented.
