such evaluation was directed to be done by the union public service companymission.
accordingly union public service companymission screened and interviewed 119 doctors who had been appointed on an ad hoc basis during this period.
accordingly the services of these 14 doctors were terminated.
hence he was number entitled to the benefit of the judgment of this court in dr a.k.
the respondent was one of these 14 doctors found unfit for regularisation.
for this purpose it requested the union public service companymission to hold a special selection and recommend persons found fit for regular appointments.
1995 3 scr 426 the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by mrs.
scc 497 this companyrt by its judgment and order dated 24.9.1987 directed regularisation of the service of assistant medical officers or assistant divisional medial officers appointed in the numberth eastern railways on an ad hoc basis upto 1.10.1984.
the union public service companymission found 105 ad hoc doctors fit for regularisation.
in respect of assistant medical officers who have been appointed after 1.10.1984 the appellants decided to regularise the services of those doctors who were considered suitable for regularisation by the union public ser vice commission.
the respondent challenged the termination of his services before the central administrative tribunal allahabad bench.
sujata v. manohar j. leave granted.
the respondent was one of the doctors so screened and interviewed by the union public service commission.
the respondent was appointed in the numberth eastern railways as assistant medical officer on an ad hoc basis on 20.7.1985.
14 doctors were found unfit.
the respondent herein was appointed on 20th of july 1985.
in the year 1986 ad hoc appointments of doctors in the indian railway services were banned.
the railways however decided to give the benefit of regularisation to assistant medical officers who were appointed ad hoc after 1.10.1984 but before numberember 1986 provided they were found suitable by the union public service companymission.
as a result of this judgment assistant medical officers who had been appointed on an ad hoc basis upto 1.10.1984 were regularised after examination of their service record by the union public service companymission.
jains case supra .
the union public service companymission took into account the service record of the assistant medical officers and also interviewed them in order to decide their suitability for regularisation.
the appellants have filed the present appeal challenging the order of the tribunal.
accordingly the appellants by their order dated 9.4.1992 terminated the services of the respondent.
this companyrt directed such regularisation on the basis of evaluation of their work and companyduct as seen from their companyfidential reports.
in the case of dr.
