The appellant was appointed initially in the year 1994 on daily wage basis as L.D.C. In the State Insurance and G.P.F. Deptt.
On 13 12 1988, 8 other persons were appointed, but the appellant was number companysidered for the same.
That writ petition was disposed of by the High Court by its order dated 22.10.1992.
13 12 1988, but will number be entitled to any salary from the date of termination till the aforesaid date of reinstatement.
The services of the appellant were number extended any further and it stood terminated.
He worked as such up to July, 1986.
The matter was carried in appeal to the Division Bench and the Division Bench by the impugned judgment, came to hold that the appellant would number be entitled to the benefit of the amended provisions of Sub rule 10 of Rule 25 and since the appellant was taken into service pursuant to the direction of the High Court and in terms of the said direction his services having stood terminated on the availability of the regularly selected candidates by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission, the order of termination cannot be found fault with.
The appellant approached the High Court by filing a C. W. P. In the year 1990.
Then, on the basis of a fresh selection made he was again appointed on daily wage basis on 25 7 1987 and that appointment was extended from time to time till 29 2 1988.
