By that Judgment the said Shankrappas Writ Petition questioning the orders of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal dated 24 11 79, was dismissed.
But in view of the Judgment of the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court titled Sri K. Shamanna v. The State of Karnataka W.P. 14245 of 1979 dated 27 11 1990 upholding the validity of Section 27A and Rule 14 A, the High Court held that the above provisions were valid.
The High Court, thereafter, observed that there was numberdispute with regard to the factual position as to the extent of land held by the writ petitioner.
In the Writ Petition the said Shankrappa also questioned the validity of Section 27A of the Mysore Religious and Charitable Inam Abolition Act, 1955 and Rule 14 A made under that Act.
A companytention was raised for the first time in the writ petition that the appropriate provision applicable to the case of appellants was Section 126 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 and number Section 27A read with Rule 14 A of the Mysore Religious and Charitable Inams Abolition Act, 1955.
This is an appeal preferred by the Legal Representatives of one Sri K. S. Shankrappa against the Judgment of the High Court of Karnataka dated 17 1 1991 in Writ Petition No.
The Tribunal had companyfirmed the order of the Special Deputy Commissioner dated 19 6 1978.
This companytention was rejected by the High Court, inasmuch as numberfactual foundation was laid to invoke Section 126 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act.
19606 of 1979.
