In this appeal we are number companycerned with other properties of the 1st respondent.
Area was also needed for stacking the manufactured bricks.
Against the order of the Competent Authority 1st respondent filed an appeal before the District Judge, Lucknow under Section 33 of the Act who dismissed the appeal.
THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1997 Present Honble Mrs. Justice Sujata V.Manohar Honble Mrs. Justice D.P.Wadhwa K.Mathur, Sr.
The Competent Authority after examing the return sent a. draft statement to the 1st respondent showing the land in village Para as agricultural land.
Mrs.Madhu Sikri, V.K.Rao.
with him for the Respondents.
1st respondent, showed that the land in question was being used mainly for the purposes of brick kiln business.
J U D G M E N T The following Judgment of the Court was delivered P. Wadhwa, J. This appeal is against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court allowing the writ petition filed by the 1st respondent holding that the agricultural land companyprised in village Para falling within the boundary of Lucknow Mahapalika was exempt under the Urban Land Ceiling Regulations Act, 1976 for short the Act Issue involved in this appeal is very narrow, After the enforcement of the Act of February 17, 1976 1st respondent filed return under Section 6 1 of the Act before the Competent Authority companystituted under the Act.
Master plan of Lucknow prepared under the Utter Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 inclusive of the village Para has been brought to the record.
Feeling aggrieved the 1st respondent filed writ petition in the High Court.
Advs.,
Shukla, Ashok K.Shrivastava, Advs.
with him for the appellant Arun Sikri Sr.
First respondent gave details of the properties and one such property was land measuring 16 Bighas 1 Biswa 7 Biswansis in village Para.
However, he proposed this land to be surplus land after applying the parameters fixed under the Act.
