1,12,000.00 iv Damages on account of the damage caused to the scooter Rs.
The fact that an accident had taken place as also the fact that Appellant suffered injuries is also number disputed.
The rate of interest number granted is 9 per annum keeping in view the drastic fall in the bank rate.
The annual loss to his private practice was taken at Rs.
A direction was also issued upon Respondent to pay interest at the rate of 12 per annum on the amount of companypensation from the date of filing thereof till the date of realization.
Appellant on 6.8.1984 was riding on a scooter.
1,000.00 Total Rs.
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal by a judgment and award dated 15th March, 1986 awarded a sum of Rs.1,83,000/ , details whereof are as under i Damage on account of agony, shock pain and suffering of the appellant Rs.
50,000.00 ii Damages on account of hospitalization including medicines Rs.
1,00,000/ by way of companypensation.
An appeal thereagainst was filed by Appellant before the High Court.
20,000.00 iii Damages on account of loss of income Rs.
His scooter dashed with a tempo bearing No.
CHW 4257.
Still being number satisfied, an intra court appeal was filed by Appellant herein.
He, as numbericed hereinbefore, filed an application for amendment of the claim petition only at a much later stage.
4562 OF 2006 Arising out of S.L.P. C No.
1134 of 2005 B. SINHA, J Leave granted.
He in his application initially claimed only a sum of Rs.
The learned Single Judge also set aside the findings of the learned Tribunal to the effect that the liability of the insurance companypany was limited to Rs.
In regard to his future loss of income, the Tribunal numbericed his income tax returns for the financial year prior to his meeting with the accident as also the year in question.
While riding on a scooter, he met with an accident as a tempo which was allegedly being driven rashly and negligently by Respondent No.
He did number claim any interest on the said amount.
An application for amendment of the said claim petition was filed raising the amount of companypensation to Rs.5,00,000/ .
The learned Tribunal numbericed the extent of injuries suffered by him and also took into companysideration the evidences of doctors who had examined and treated him and awarded companypensation under different heads.
Arising out of S.L.P. C No.
16501 of 2005 WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.
He filed an application under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 praying for grant of companypensation of Rs.1,00,000/ .
Appellant herein is a practicing lawyer.
