However, on companysideration of thee evidence, the Trial Court found the appellant guilty of offence punishable under Sections 307, posed 427 and 448 IPC.
As numbered above, the High Court dismissed the appeal.
Different sentences were imposed which were directed to run companycurrently.
306 OF 2008 Arising out of S.L.P. Crl.
The accused appellant preferred an appeal before the High Court.
P.W. 1 and 2 testified to the overt acts of the accused in causing injuries on them.
The wound certificate of P.W. 1 discloses hat an incised wound on the right hand, leniar abrasion on the back of trunk over the region of left scapula and leniar abrasion on the right scapula region.
The Trial Court framed charges against the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 307, 427 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in short IPC .
The wound certificate of P.W.2 discloses incised wound on the occipital region of scalp and tenderness at the left clavicle resulting in fracture of left clavicle and first metatarsal bone.
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
She supports the prosecution version.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.
Challenge in these appeals is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court.
The case of the prosecution was that on 27.9.2000 at about 8.30 P.M. the accused trespassed into the house and assaulted his sister in law PW1 with sickle and also assaulted his mother PW2 with sickle.
The accused pleaded innocence.
Nos.6893 6894 of 2007 DR.
