It was numbered that on examination of the plaint the only allegation made in the plaint was that the defendants are trying to disposess the plaintiff.
243/1997 passed by a learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Puttur, by learned Senior Civil Judge, Puttur in AS No.
The plaintiff has been raising rain fed crops in the schedule property.
The plaintiff filed a second appeal in terms of the Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in short the Code questioning the reversal of the judgment and decree in O.S. No.
2 Learned companynsel for the appellant brought to our numberice that the averments in the plaint at paras 2 and 4 which read as follows 2 The plaintiff submits that over since the time of his father for more than 60 years, plaintiff and his family members have been in companytinuous, peaceful possession and enjoyment of the schedule property exercising absolute rights over the same.
Dr.ARIJIT PASAYAT,J. Leave granted.
The companytroversy in the present appeal lies within a narrow companypass.
25/2002.
