Krishna Devi Asthana was got inspected by the Rent Control Inspector on September 2, 1977 in his absence.
The learned District Judge upheld these objections and accordingly set aside the impugned order of allotment.
The appellant filed a revision before the District Judge under Section 18 of the Act mainly on the ground that numberopportunity was afforded to him either to file objections or to make submissions as required under Rule 8 2 framed under the U.P. Act No.
XIII of 1972 and further that numbernotice as required under Rule 9 3 was ever served on him, number was he heard in response to the numberice.
Immediately on the service of the numberice on September 6, 1977, the appellant appeared and filed an application before the Rent Control Eviction Officer praying for 15 days time for filing his objection as the papers were with his lawyers clerk.
On a petition by respondent No.
On the basis of an intimation given to the Rent Control Eviction Officer, a residential house belonging to the appellant which was in occupation of one Smt.
P. Sen, J. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order of the Allahabad High Court dated September 13, 1978 setting aside the order of the District Judge, Gorakhpur dated December 15, 1977 and restoring an order of allotment dated September 7, 1977 passed by the Rent Control Eviction Officer, Gorakhpur under Section 16 1 a of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings Regulation of Letting, Rent Eviction Act, 1972.
