307 and 308 admeasuring 40x31 in Hubli town and for recovery of possession on the plea that the appellant has numbermanner of right whatsoever to interfere with his possession.
The trial Court dismissed the suit, On appeal, it was decreed.
Thus, this appeal by special leave.
This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the learned single judge, made on February 29,1996 in S.A. No.
In the second appeal, the learned judge companyfirmed the same.
But in the Review application, the single judge reheard the matter and reversed the decree of the appellate companyrt and companyfirmed that of the trial Court.
We have heard learned companynsel on both sides.
The respondents had filled a suit in the trial Court for declaration that he had purchased two plots bearing Nos.
Leave granted.
It is seen that by an order passed by companyrt on 24th November, 1995, liberty was given to the appellant, in the event of the High Court was justified in reviewing the earlier order and reversing the find recorded by the appellate Court ?
90/1983 by the Karnataka High Court.
