It would suffice to numbere that while quashing the order of companypulsory retirement passed against the appellant, an Upper Division Clerk in the Police Department, the learned Single Judge had directed his reinstatement with payment of 50 of back wages.
By the impugned order, the High Court, while allowing the appeal, preferred by the appellant, in part, has directed that he will be entitled to 25 of the back wages as against 50 of back wages awarded by the learned Single Judge.
Since the companytroversy in the appeal is companyfined to the question whether the appellate Bench was justified in reducing the amount of back wages in an appeal preferred by the appellant for further enhancement of the back wages, we deem it unnecessary to state the facts in detail.
This appeal is directed against the judgment and final order dated October 09, 2007 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, in Writ Appeal No.
Being aggrieved with the direction for payment of back wages 50, the appellant preferred intra Court appeal.
Leave granted.
173 of 2006.
