Therefore, the Tribunals and the High Court were number justified in setting aside the alienation.
The appellants predecessor in title, Dasana Rangaiah Bin Dasaiah was granted on November 16, 1951 an extent of two acres of land in Government vacant land bearing Survey No.
On a representation made by one of the sons on February 27, 1987 to the Assistant Commissioner companytending that the alienation was in violation of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prohibition of Certain Lands Act, 1975.
The appellate authority by its order dated November 17, 1987 companyfirmed the same under Rule 43 5 of the Revenue Code.
6 of Beekanahalli village, Chikmangalur Taluk District.
Thus the appeal against the order of the Division Bench dated June 23, 1989 made in W.A. No.950/89 by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore.
The sale was set aside as violative of the Revenue Code Rule 43 5 .
The appellant claimed to have purchased the property from the sons and widow of the assignee on October 16, 1968.
In the writ petition and writ appeal, it was companyfirmed.
57/91, 11397/89 and 17011/90 O R D E R Leave granted.
8507, 8508 8510/95 OF 1995.
WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS.
Arising out of SLP C Nos.
The appellant carried the matter in appeal.
Shri Ravi P. Wadhwani, the learned companynsel appearing for the appellant, has strenuously companytended, after good preparation that under the grant initially made to Dasana Rangaiah Bin Dasaiah, the prohibition for alienation was only for ten years and, therefore, by necessary implication the grantee thereafter, was free to alienate the land.
The alienation was made 17 years after the grant.
