The appellants before us were number parties to the said Criminal Appeal.
The deceased who received bleeding injury left his chappals there and started to run from the said place.
Upon numbericing that the deceased was being chased, PW3 and Ashokan came out of the hotel.
Admittedly, numberchargesheet was filed against the appellant herein.
PW1 and her relatives after the said incident allegedly shifted to another village Palayamkottai.
As PW1 was number feeling well, she came to the medical shop of her father in law to purchase medicines.
The deceased ran inside Hare Krishna hotel which, as numbericed hereinbefore, owned by the father in law of PW1.
Nallakannu Muthu, Murugan and Popular Muthiah came behind him in a Rajdoot motorcycle.
They were arrested and released on bail subject to certain companyditions.
The deceased was taken to the Government Hospital, Palaymkottai in an auto rickshaw by PW3 along with PW2, PW3 and PW4 where he was declared dead by the doctor.
Nallakannu and Murugan allegedly chased him.
696 of 1997.
At that time, PW3 brother of PW1 and PW4 Ashokan, brother in law of PW1 were inside the hotel.
Inside the hotel, Murugan is said to have assaulted the deceased on his chest.
They stopped them near the Palayamkottai bus stand.
The deceased thereafter fell down whereupon Nallakannu again is said to have assaulted the deceased on the left side of his chest with the sickle.
Thereafter, Nallakannu came out of the hotel and went towards west.
The father in law of PW1 was a homoeopathic doctor.
Before the learned Sessions Judge, all the eye witnesses allegedly took the names of the appellants as having played active roles in the entire episode.
The said appeal came up for hearing before a Division Bench of the High Court.
He was having a medical shop.
Nallakannu took a sickle which is said to have been hidden in his shirt and assaulted George on the left side of his neck.
He was also having a hotel companymonly known as Hare Krishna hotel.
A companyy of the said chargesheet, however, admittedly was number sent to the first informant.
The deceased also received injuries at their hands on his shoulder and on the left ear.
On 11.7.1992 at about 3.00 P.M., PW3 brother of PW1, Arasappan father of PW1, Vanumamali brother in law of PW3, Raj son of PW1s sister Ganambal and George deceased son of PW1s sister Ganambal came to the house of PW1.
The prosecution case relates to an incidence which took place on 13.3.1992 resulting in death of one Chandran.
The appellant Popular Muthiah allegedly shouted to kill George son of PW1s sister Ganambal and left the scene on the motorcycle leaving behind Nallakannu and Murugan.
Nallakannu Muthu also assaulted him on the left side of his chest.
The learned Magistrate, before whose Court the said chargesheet was filed also did number inform the first informant which was mandatory.
He preferred an appeal against the said judgment of companyviction and sentence in the High Court which was registered as Criminal Appeal No.
Nallakannu Muthu alone was companymitted to the Court of Sessions.
A case was registered against PW3, the brother of PW1, Arasappan, father of PW1, Vanumamali, brother in law of PW3, Raja, son of PW3, Raj son of PW1s sister Ganambal and George deceased son of the PW1s sister Ganambal.
WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.
108 OF 2003 B. SINHA, J. Whether inherent jurisdiction of the High Court is available while dealing with a Criminal Appeal filed by an accused is the principal question involved in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 18.4.2002 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Criminal Appeal No.
A First Information Report in respect of the said incident was lodged by PW 1.
The medical shop and the hotel were situate opposite to each other near Palaymkottai bus stand and were at a distance of 6 furlongs from the house of PW1.
On 13.3.1992, the brother of Nallakannu Muthu was said to have fatally been attacked in Maruthur Village.
696 of 1997.
