On 31.8.1982 she companymitted suicide.
8, 10 and 11 the Trial Court came to hold that the accused had abetted suicide.
In the evening when he reached the house the room was found closed from inside and the deceased did number respond to his call for opening the door.
Appeal before the High Court did number bring any relief to the appellant.
Primarily relying on the evidence of PWs.
The police went with him and with the help of persons of the locality broke open the door and found that the deceased had companymitted suicide by hanging from the roof.
Apprehending that there was something wrong, he went to Police Station and lodged the report.
In support of the appeal, learned companynsel for the appellant submitted that the witnesses PWs.8, 10, and 11 who are the brothers and the mother of the deceased clearly stated that after living together for long years some differences cropped up between the deceased and the accused and, therefore, she started living in the house of the parents.
According to the prosecution in the evening of 31.8.1982 the accused left for his duty leaving the deceased in the house.
Accordingly the companyviction was recorded and sentence was imposed.
The accused was arrested for allegedly having abetted deceased to companymit suicide on 31.8.1982.
After companypletion of investigation charge sheet was placed and the accused pleaded innocence.
On the basis of information lodged by the accused investigation was undertaken.
The background facts in a nutshell are as follows Appellant was married to Rajkumari hereinafter referred to as the deceased .
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by the learned Single Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant questioning his companyviction under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in short IPC and sentencing him to undergo RI for five years.
