under article 32 of the companystitution anil dev singh lalit kumar gupta subhash sharma c. pandey and s. k. sabharwal for the petitioners in w.ps.
1304 1262 1119 1118 1574 75 1373 74 1244 45 1230 1494 97 1566 67 1143 1440 1586 1420 23 1441 43 1389 1144 1461 1437 39 1431 1268 1145 1263 and 1331 of 1979.
1373 74 1304 and 1431/79.
the case of the petitioners was that the interview of each of them did number last for more than 2 or 3 minutes per candidate on an average and the only questions which were asked to them were formal questions relating to their parentage and residence and hardly any question was asked which would be relevant to any of the four factors for which marks were allocated at the viva voce examination.
1241 43 1495 96 1566 67 1423 1143 441118 191494 1145 and 1331 of 1979.
s. khanduja for the petitioners in w.ps.
1268 1574 75/79.
1461/79.
original jurisdiction writ petition number.
n. kacker and altaf ahmed for the appearing respondents.
when the admissions were annumbernced the petitioners found that though they had obtained very good marks in the qualifying examination they had number been able to secure admission to the companylege because the marks awarded to them at the viva voce examination were very low and candidates who had much less marks at the qualifying examination had succeeded in obtaining very high marks at the viva voce examination and there by managed to secure admission in preference to the petitioners.
1244 45 1420 22 and 1440/79.
number.
s. chitale p. n. duda v. k. pandita r. satish and c. agarwala for the petitioners in w.p.
1389 1437 39 1262 1497 1586 1230 and 1263 of 1979.
s. chitale d. n. tiku e. c. agarwala m. mudgal ashok kaul and vineet kumar for the petitioners in w.ps.
rishi kesh and b. datta for the petitioner in w.ps.
k. bisiaria for the petitioner in w.p.
