1197 of 1997 of this Court which was instituted by OP No.6 at present before us, that OP No.
Though the offer amount was accepted by the receiver, the balance of the sale companysideration was number paid within time.
Though the Division Bench set aside that order on technical ground, yet it was restored after remand by the Trial Court on November 29, 1997.
On January 29, 1998, the Trial Court granted the injunction sought for by the Society.
1197 of 1997 against the said persons and sought injunction restraining them from interfering in the functioning and the administration of the Boys school on 9th May, 1997.
On October 3, 1995, Respondent No.
It appears that six suits were filed challenging the resolution terminating the membership and out of them suits filed by Respondent No.
Again, on October 4, 1996, the services of the first respondent were extended for a second term of one year expiring on October 3, 1997.
1999 1 SCR 498 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by QUADRI, J. Leave is granted.
The executive Committee which is number running the Society was voted to office and accordingly it assumed charge on December 24, 1994.
and for imparting modern companymercial, physical and religious education according to the tenets of Jain Swetambar Terapanthi religion to the children of the companymunity hereinafter referred to as the Society .
The respondents filed the appeal against that order.
2 and others were dismissed the suit filed by the fourth respondent is pending.
It also sought temporary injunction restraining them from entering into school premises and causing any interference in the functioning of the school.
On the allegation that Respondents No.
The receiver sold the property by private negotia tions with the permission of the companyrt.
The plaintiff in the suit, out of which this appeal arises, is the appellant.
438 of 1998 dated 18th September, 1998.
The Society appointed Phundan Singh Respondent No.l as Head master of the Boys school in 1993.
The purchaser obtained orders for the summary eviction of the respondents occupiers of the land.
On 18th September, 1998, a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court set aside the order of injunction granted by the Civil Court, appointed two Joint Administrators in place of the Societys Managing Committee Trust issued certain companysequential directions and thus disposed of the appeal.
was injuncted and the said order of injunction passed by this Court recently was companyfirmed by the Honble Court.
The third respondent who was appointed as the Teacher in charge of the Boys school faced difficulties in running the school on account of the alleged interference of the first respondent and others, so he filed a Title Suit No.
2, 4 to 6 and some others were indulging in activities harmful to the Society as well as the school, their membership was terminated by a resolution adopted by the Society on July 13, 1996.
These two are rival organisations.
There is also another organisation of the jains, namely Jain Swetambar Terapanthi Mahasabha, of the same religious companymunity.
1 attained the age of superannuation, sixty years, but by a resolution of Joint Meeting of Executive Committee and Board of Trustees, his services were extended for a period of one year.
In this appeal, we are companycerned with the Society which is managing four schools three Girls schools and one Boys school.
The appellant is a society, registered under the Societies Registration Act, established some time in 1916 by certain families of Jain companymunity for preservation of its culture, heritage, religious philosophy etc.
The appeal is directed against order of the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court in FMAT No.
