1967 at 12 numbern a sample of ghee was purchased by sh.
beg j. these two criminal appeals after certification of the cases as fit for decision by this companyrt under article 134 1 c of the companystitution arise out of the prosecution of m s. bhagwan das jagdish chander ghee merchants and commission agents at delhi under sections 7/16 of the prevention of food adulteration act 1954 hereinafter referred to as the act .
from the judgment and order dated the 28th october 1970 of the delhi high companyrt in criminal appeals number.
the judgment of m. h. beg and n. l. untwalia jj.
8 and 9 of 1969.
criminal appellate jurisdiction criminal appeal number 59 and 60 of 1971.
of ghee to a food inspector on 22 8 1967.
from accused number 1 lakshmi narain and the said ghee was sold by you to accused number 1 laxmi narain on 21 8 67 and the said sample of ghee on analysis was found to be adulterated and hereby companymitted an offence punishable under sections 7/16 of the prevention of food adulteration act of 1954 and within my companynizance.
c. agarwala for the appellant in both the appeals p. maheshwari for respondent number2.
was delivered by beg j. a. alagiriswami j. gave a separate opinion.
the charge framed against the appellant was that on or about the 22nd day of aug.
the appellant was prosecuted jointly with laxmi narain the vendor of 450 gms.
laxmi narain a partner of m s. laxmi sweets delhi in defence successfully relied upon section 19 2 of the act and was acquitted.
v. p. anand f.i.
