Being aggrieved by the dismissal of his application and the companysequential framing of charge under section 304 Part II, the respondent preferred a criminal application under section 482 of the Code before the Criminal Appellate Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay.
It is against the said order of the High Court, the State of Maharashtra has preferred this appeal.
It is the case of the prosecution that on the night intervening the 27th and 28th September, 2002, the respondent drove his car under the influence of alcohol, in a rash manner and caused the death of one person and caused grievous injuries to four others who happened to be sleeping on the footpath.
2 4615 2003 SANTOSH HEGDE, J. Heard learned companynsel for the parties.
These charges against the respondents were registered based on a companyplaint lodged by one Shri Ravindra Patil, a Police Constable attached to the Security Department and posted with the respondent to look after his security.
Leave granted.
