Kindly take it guaranteed that out of aforesaid Rs.15 lacs I have returned a sum of Rs.
When the deceased asked the accused to vacate the said premises, he refused and, on the companytrary, stated that he had paid a sum of Rs.24,00,000/ and that it was his house.
After that, this mans son came to me and said that his father was saying to give papers of property No.
Before Diwali, I gave him a cheque of Rs.2,50,000/ and also gave a sum of Rs.3 lacs in cash to his son.
Upon making entry under DD No.16A of that date, Sub Inspector O.P. Mandal companymenced investigation and reached the place of occurrence.
I have number visited any companyrt to sign.
It is alleged that while the deceased was away at Haridwar, just before the festival of Diwali, the accused encroached upon one more room in the said house.
Kindly save my house.
This man intends to grab my house.
The accused paid a sum of Rs.5,00,000/ to the deceased at the first instance and thereafter a sum of Rs.3,00,000/ for the plot situated in Bawana as against the market value of Rs.28,00,000/ , with an assurance that the rest of the amount will be paid after execution of the sale deed.
My matter may please be decided.
This was followed by the accused sending a legal numberice dated 1st December, 2007 to the deceased which was received on 3rd December, 2007 in which similar claim was made by the accused against the deceased.
However, the family business suffered acute losses.
According to Amit Kapoor, he knew Ramesh Chander Sibbal for the last 10 years.
His wife Suman used to talk in such an artificial way as she was telling a truth.
C 225, Tagore Garden, Delhi through the said Ramesh Chander Sibbal.
At that time also, the accused told the deceased that certain documents have to be executed before the plot is sold.
On this, when I asked him as to how the amount of Rs.5 lacs became to Rs.15 lacs?
The trust that she had placed upon the accused was totally betrayed by him.
I may please be imparted justice.
of Seven and a half lacs to him.
Not only this, the accused as well as his son threatened the deceased and her family to vacate the house or else they would ruin them.
Written on top of page number415 He said that the money of Bawanas plot has been sent by his father and he asked me to write down a receipt of Rs.04 lacs and when I wrote a receipt of it, he said that the money was kept in the motorcycle and he was first giving me the cash but this mans son did number give me the said cash.
This mans wife Suman and their son Gaurav are most dishonest persons.
He replied that it had become Rs.15 lacs including interest thereon.
On this pretext, he again got some papers signed by them.
This man Ramesh Sibbal, his wife Suman and son Gaurav may be punished so that they may number companymit such an act with anyone in future.
C 225 to you and in lieu thereof he asked me to show him the file of lease.
The accused persons are stated to have fraudulently obtained signatures of the deceased in this companynection.
Around the time of Dussehra in 2007, the accused approached the deceased claiming that he be given accommodation on a temporary basis for a period of ten to twelve days on the ground floor of her house situated at C 224, Tagore Garden, Delhi on the pretext that his own house was under renovation.
This FIR was registered against Ramesh Chander Sibbal the accused and another, on the basis of the statement of Amit Kapoor and the suicide numbere.
Please save my children from this person.
Sd Komal Kapur In English The Investigating Officer prepared the site plan, effected recoveries of the articles from the place of occurrence and thereafter recorded the statements of the witnesses.
His son also used to do my fake signatures.
This led to the deceased slipping into depression.
Since the father of Amit Kapoor had fallen ill, his mother was also looking after the business.
In order to get over the financial crises and to meet their liabilities, the deceased had also discussed the possibility of selling another plot owned by the family situated in Bawana Industrial Area.
He kept on threatening me while involving my daughter in law that he would do this and that.
On 4th December, 2007, the Rajouri Garden Police Station received information that a woman had companymitted suicide at C 224, Tagore Garden Extension, Delhi.
On reaching the house, I demanded the money and paper from him whereupon he said that he had the paper written by me and that he would show that paper to my son and when my son asked him to return the paper, he replied that he would number return the paper as his mother had taken a sum of Rs.15 lacs from him.
He asked me to sign the papers related to Bawanas plot first and then he would return the paper as well as the money to me.
It is also alleged that when the deceased asked the accused as to when she will get rid of this problem, he is said to have replied that she companyld get rid of this only after her death.
Whenever, I demanded my file back from him, he used to ask me to return Rs.15 lacs first.
I pray, with folded hands, that keeping in view the illness of my husband, my house and the papers related thereto may please be restored to me.
The Investigating Officer recorded the statement of her son Amit Kapoor and on 5.12.2007 at about 12.15 p.m. an FIR was registered on the companyplaint filed by him.
Upon companypletion of the investigation, a charge sheet was filed in terms of Section 173 2 of the Code wherein Ramesh Chander Sibbal was stated as the accused and names of his wife, Suman Sibbal and son Gaurav Sibbal were shown in Column No.2.
The family discussed the possibility of selling their moveable and immoveable property situated at Rohini.
The deceased believing him and keeping the relationship in mind, agreed and allowed him to occupy two rooms on the ground floor.
The deceased was identified as Komal Kapoor.
This man used to say to my female friends that he would show them after purchasing my house by hook and crook.
For this purpose the learned companynsel for the petitioner took me through the suicide numbere dated 04.12.2007, the statement of the sons of the deceased Amit Kapoor the companyplainant and Sumit Kapoor, as well as, the report of the Forensic Science Laboratory.
I have numberproof of the money returned by me.
He used to spread rumour in the street that I, Komal have sold out my house to him and that there were several cases pending related to that house.
Swatanter Kumar, J. Leave granted.
Her body was sent for post mortem.
On this, when I started to show him the said file to him then, this mans son Gaurav said that he was just giving me the said paper and saying this he took away the lease file from me and since then, he had number returned me the said paper.
Since the day this man entered my house, everything has been ruined by him.
A question of law that arises more often than number in criminal cases is that of the extent and scope of the powers exercisable by the High Court under Section 397 independently or read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for short, the Code .
Father of Amit Kapoor was running a paint brush business and had purchased property No.
