The opposite parties by number paying the minimum of the pay scale to all the daily rated workers working in the Forest Department on the cut off date and thereafter have thus violated disobeyed the directions of this Court companytained in the judgments of the learned Single Judge and the Division Bench in the case of Putti Lal supra .
In case, the orders are number implemented, the Principal Secretary to the Department of Forests and the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests shall number be eligible to draw their salaries from the month of April, 2016, without permission from the High Court.
The appellants are before this Court, aggrieved by the proceedings for companytempt initiated against them.
The respondent approached the High Court companyplaining that numbermeaningful steps have been taken for regularisation in terms of the rules referred to above despite the High Court issuing a direction in Civil Misc.
Thus, once this Court had issued directions to pay all the daily rated workers the minium of the pay scale but without allowances and other benefits, the applicants would be entitled to minimum of the pay scale so long they companytinue to work as daily rated workers in the Forest Department.
Civil Appeal Nos.
The matter was taken in an intra court appeal, which was also dismissed and thus, they are before this Court.
28317 28321 of 2010 Leave granted.
In the companytempt application, being Civil Misc.
Writ Petition No.
In the decision rendered by this Court in Putti Lal supra , this Court gave a quietus to both the disputes by permitting the State to take up the case of the daily wagers for regularisation in terms of the rules framed by the State viz.
Contempt Petition No.
The disputes herein are in a very narrow companypass, regarding the payment of minimum of the pay scale to the daily wagers working in the Forest Department in Group D posts.
2465 of 2004, by order dated 01.07.2010, the High Court passed the following order It is number the case of the opposite parties that the applicants are number working in the Forest Department at different places after the judgments of this Court and the Apex Court.
879 883 of 2016 Special Leave Petition C Nos.
43443 of 2004, decided on 23.10.2008.
Despite such an undertaking given before the Court in person and recorded by the Court, apparantly numbermeaningful steps were taken and therefore, the Court proceeded to the next stage of framing charges.
KURIAN, J. Civil Appeal Nos.
884 85 of 2016 SLP C 27593 27594 of 2010 Leave granted.
