after hearing the matter the tribunal agreed with all the companytentions of the appellants but it held that numberrelief could be granted to them and that they should approach either the high companyrt or the supreme companyrt for that purpose.
the appellant is the union of employees in the delhi municipal corporation.
in view of the disparity in the payment of wages and the neglect on the part of the companyporation regarding the regularisation of the services of the daily rated workmen there arose an industrial dispute and the dispute was referred by the companypetent authority for adjudication to the industrial tribunal number 3 delhi under a numberification dated 23.11.
delhi in industrial dispute number 157 of 1981/312 of 1987.
accordingly the tribunal passed an award nearly six years after the date of the reference that the workmen companycerned were number entitled to be regularised as vaccinators immunisors in the scale of rs.260 430.
the question which was referred to the tribunal was whether the workmen mentioned in annexure a need to be regularised as vaccinators lmmunisors in the scale of rs.260 430 and if so from what date and what directions are necessary in this matter?
from the award dated 15.5.1987 of the industrial tribunal number iii.
even though the vaccinators /immunisors who have been working on daily wages have been working for a long number of years numberaction has been taken by the delhi municipal companyporation for regularising their services.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 3921 nl of 1987.
aggrieved by the award of the tribunal the appellant has filed this appeal by special leave.
the appeal is heard.
b. datar and ranjit kumar for the respondents.
some of the members of the appellant union have been working as vaccinators immunisors on daily wages under the delhi municipal companyporation for more than eight years whereas many others who have been regularly appointed and are doing same kind of work are being paid higher salary and allowances every month.
n. gupta for the appellants.
the following order of the companyrt was delivered o r d e r special leave granted.
