It is admitted that two civil suits are also pending between the parties.
The Forensic Science Laboratory to whom the said sale deed and acknowledgment were sent for a scientific opinion allegedly in its opinion dated 31st October, 1997 stated that the said sale deed and acknowledgement were forged documents.
However, in the meanwhile being number satisfied with the investigation carried out by the police authorities, he filed a criminal companyplaint in the Court of the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, West and South , Saroornagar in the District of Ranga Reddy against the respondent herein, alleging companymission of offences under Sections 420, 426, 447 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code.
By reason of the impugned judgment dated 31st August, 2001, a learned Single Judge of the High Court held that having regard to the police report in Cr.
Questioning the said order, the respondent filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the High Court of Judicature at Andhra Pradesh which was marked as Criminal Petition No.591 of 1999.
The companyplaint case filed by the appellant was also closed.
The Investigating Officer, however, upon investigation of the matter came to the companyclusion that the dispute between the parties was a civil dispute.
J U D G M E N T Arising out of SLP Crl.
The case disposal report filed by the police was accepted by the learned Magistrate.
The appellant herein on or about 2nd September, 1998 filed a protest petition.
He also arrived at a companyclusion that the appellant herein had executed the acknowledgment.
On or about 8th November, 2002, a third companyplaint was filed by the appellant herein purported to be under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure whereupon summons were issued upon the respondent.
A case disposal report on the said basis was filed before the learned Magistrate.
The said order has number been questioned by the him.
No.13 of 2002 B. SINHA, J Leave granted.
He lodged a First Information Report against the respondent on 19th July, 1997, alleging, inter alia, therein that a sale deed and acknowledgment purported to have been executed by him were forged and fabricated documents and the respondent wrongfully trespassed into the lands bearing Survey Nos.100/1 and 101/1 situate at Serlingampaly in the District of Ranga Reddy, Andhra Pradesh.
The companyplainant is the appellant herein.
