The order of detention was passed with a view to preventing the petitioner from acting in a manner prejudicial to maintenance of supplies and services essential to the companymunity.
Station.
If the facts are true, it was a very serious matter and the District Magistrate would be justifiably satisfied of the necessity of passing orders of detention to prevent the petitioner from indulging in such acts plainly prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the companymunity.5/16 to 5/17.
you along with your associate being armed with bombs, daggers etc.
you along with your associates being armed with bombs, daggers etc.
On 8.8.1972 at about 21.30 hrs.
The grounds served on the detenu are as follows On 27.7.1972 at about 7.30 hrs.
As a result of this theft train services in Sealdah Dankuni Section was seriously disrupted.
The Railway employees tried to resist but you and your associates scared them away pelting stones and hurling bombs and managed to escape with the stolen cables.
10/15 to 10/13 in between Ballyghat and Dankuni Rly.
companymitted theft of 10 metres of 12 companye P.V.C. cable from Down distant signal of Baranagar Rly.
companymitted theft at 25 feet of 12 Gore PVC cable from KM Post No.
to prevent any interference with their activities.
employees you and your associates scared them away by pelting stones and hurling bombs, and made good your escape with the stolen cables.
Being resisted by the Rly.
Palekar, J. In this petition for a writ of habeas companypus under Article 32 of the Constitution the petitioner is detained by the District Magistrate, Howrah by an order dated 9 10 1972 passed in exercise of the powers under Sub section 1 read with Sub section 2 of Section 3 of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 Act 26 of 1971 .
