The deceased were members of the Kunnath Tavazhi.
He had several other properties.
Ummamma Amma died on 3.11.1966 and Kunhiraman Nair, the other companytestator died on 18.7.1978.
Respondent number.
The caveator to the probate proceedings is the widow of Kunhiraman Nair.
After hearing the companytesting parties the trial companyrt, in the light of the evidence recorded before it, came to the companyclusion that the Will was proved and was number surrounded by any suspicious circumstances and hence granted the probate.
The other properties were given to Respondent Nos.
Under the Will the school and its site had been bequeathed to Respondent Nos.
250/ .
1 to 7 were members of a companylateral branch of the Tavazhi while 8th Respondent was maid servant and was dependent of the companytestator Kunhiraman Nair.
Kunhiraman Nair was the manager of a school.
He did number file any caveat.
1 and 2 .
The Appellants have challenged the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala companyfirming the grant of probate of Will as ordered by the trial companyrt.
B. Majmudar and U.C. Banerjee, JJ.
1 to 7 with direction to pay the 8th Respondent an amount of Rs.
The husband of the other companytestator Ummamma Amma was stated to be alive when she died.
The Respondents herein had filed original petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for grant of probate in respect of an unregistered Will alleged to have been jointly executed by one Ummamma Amma and Kunhiraman Nair, on 14.10.1966.
