2985 of 1976 and Misc.
632 State of Tamil Nadu, Rajendra Chowdhary, for the interveners Applicants A Ratnaabhapati and Jayalakshimi Co. M s. Jeshtmal, K.R. Chowdhary, Mrs. Veena Devi Khanna, for the intervener applicant N. Dhanraj.
Tamil Nadu.
646 S. Nariman, R.N. Banerjee, J.B. Dadachanji K.J. John with him for the appellant No.
632, 638 and W.P. No.
655 1286 of 1976 From the Judgment and Order dated the 14 5 1976, 23rd, 24th, 27th April, 1976 of the Bombay High Court in S.C.A. No.
From the Judgment and Order dated the 22/23/26/27th of April, 1976 of the Bombay High Court in S.C.A. Nos.
634 F.S. Nariman and R.N. Bennerjee, Adv.
632 638 A.J. Rana, in CA.
632 to 646 of 1976.
637 H.P. Shah, in CAs.
633 Sachin Chowdhary, in CA.
only in CAs.
A. V. Rangam, Sathiadev and Miss A. Subhashini, in the for the inter vener in CA.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeals No.
A. Desai, S.C. Agarwala and V.J. Francis, for Re spondents 4 5 in CA.
635 P.H. Parekh Miss Manju Jetly, with them, for the appellants in CAs.
Niren De, Attorney Genl.
98/76 1.
52 in CA.
1286/76.
632 637 Vallabhadas Mohta, Sardar Bahadur Saharya Vishnu Bahadur Saharya, for the appellants in CAs.
632 Y.S. Chitale, in CA.
L. Nain, A.J. Rana, Janendra Lal, B.R. Agarwala and Gagras Co., with him for the appellants in CAs 645 646 except for appellant No.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KRISHNA IYER, J. The distance between societal reali ties and companystitutional dilettantism often makes for the dillemma of statutory validity and the arguments addressed in the present batch of certificated appeals and writ petitions evidence this forensic quandary.
W. Adik, Adv.
of Maharashtra, M.N. Shroff for the Respondents in the appeals and Writ Petitions P. Chandrakantral Urs and N. Nettar, for the interven er in CA.
632/76 State of Karnataka Parasaran, Adv.
638 644 644.
in CA.
997, 2128, 2773, 2077, 2065, 2045, 1172, 1193, 1195, 1196, 1199, 1200, 1210/ 75 and 2050 2071 of 1976 and CIVIL APPEALS NOS.
62 in 646/76 Madhukar Soochak, K. Rajendra Chowdhary, K.A. Shah and Mrs. Veena Devi Khanna, Advocates for the Appellant in CA.
Petition 4 of 1976 and WRIT PETITIONS NOS.
