The detenu made representations on 16.7.2011to the Central Government as well as to the Government of Manipur which stood rejected.
The District Magistrate, Imphal West passed the detention order dated 30.6.2011 under the Act on various grounds with an apprehension that as in similar cases, the accused involved therein had been enlarged on bail the detenu in this case would also be released on bail and he would indulge in activities prejudicial to public order.
The detention order was companyfirmed vide order dated 16.8.2011and companyfirmation order was furnished to the detenu on 18.8.2011.
The appellants son was served with the grounds of detention dated 2.7.2011.
Hence, this appeal.
No.98 of 2011 challenging the detention order in Gauhati High Court Imphal Bench which stood dismissed vide impugned judgment and order dated 13.1.2012.
The appellant filed Writ Petition Crl.
Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J. This Criminal Appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 13.l.2012 passed by the Gauhati High Court, Imphal Bench at Imphal in Writ Petition Crl.
The son of the appellant, namely, Huidrom Shantikumar Singh was arrested on 19.6.2011 by the Imphal Police under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 hereinafter called IPC read with Section 25 1 C of the Arms Act, 1959 hereinafter called Arms Act .
No.98 of 2011 dismissing the Habeas Corpus petition challenging the order of detention of appellants son dated 30.6.2011 passed by the District Magistrate, Imphal West District under Section 3 2 of the National Security Act, 1980 hereinafter called the Act .
