During the pendency of the main custody case, the temporary custody of the child Roshni will be with the respondent number 2 i.e. husband father.
1735 of 2014 filed by the wife against her husband seeking production and return of her minor daughter and praying for some companysequential reliefs therein.
The respondent number 2 will drop the child on every Saturday by 6.00 pm.
115/2014, on merits preferably within six months as an outer limit strictly in accordance with law keeping in view the paramount interest and welfare of the child and all relevant factors necessary for deciding the custody of minor child uninfluenced by any of our observations.
at the petitioners residence and companylect the child by 6.00 pm.
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Leave granted.
on the next day Sunday .
So far as this appeal is companycerned, as mentioned above, it arises out of final judgment and order dated 07.11.2014 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in a habeas companypus petition bearing W.P. Crl.
The High Court, by impugned judgment, disposed of the writ petition inter alia directing the Family Court to dispose of the main custody case.
