On 20 2 1972 at 09.25 hrs, at Howrah Goods Yard near Oriapara Quarters you along with your associates being armed with deadly weapons viz, bombs, iron rods etc.
As a result one RPF Sub Inspector was injured.
One of your associates as a result of firing sustained injury who was subsequently arrested at Howrah General Hospital.
companymitted theft in respect of D.O plates from the Rly.
The impugned order was passed on these grounds On 18 7 71 at 02.15 hrs.
The order, proceeds the argument, has been passed mechanically without applying the mind.
The petitioner was arrested in respect of those offences on March 10, 1972 and forwarded to the judicial Magistrate who released him on bail on the same day.
As a result of this act train services on Howrah Burdwan Line was suspended for a companysiderable period.
Being challenged by the RPF party you and your associates attacked them by pelting stones and hurling bombs.
Being challenged by the R.P.F. Party you and your associates attacked them by pelting stones in order to take away the stole batteries by terrorising them.
In companysequence of theft of Rly.
One iron rod which were recovered by the RPF party.
Being challenged by the person on duty R.P.F. party you and your associates attacked them by pelting stooes causing injury to the R.P.F. Party.
property running of the train services were disrupted.
In respect of these incidents, three cases were registered with the police in regard to offences under Sections 147, 148, 337, 307 and 379, Penal Code.
Yard near Tikiapara Rly.
which were recovered by the RPF Party.
It was on 18 5 72 that the impugned order was made and the petitioner preventively detained.
you along with your associates being armed with deadly weapons like daggers etc.
The R.P.F. had to open fire when you and your associates fled away leaving behind 3 three pieces of D.O. Plates.
companymitted theft of wheat bags from a wagon No.
As a result of this act train services in Howrah Burdwan Line was seriously disrupted.
The RPF party in exercise of right of private defence fired one round and you and your associates fled away leaving behind 2 bags of wheat.
ER 86018 standing on Line No.
track.
The detention order states that the detention was necessary to prevent the petitioner from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the companymunity.
S. Sarkaria, J. Abdul Gaffer, petitioner challenges the order dated 18 5 1972, of his detention made under Section 3 of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971.
On 25 11 71 at 14.15 hrs in between Chandmari Bridge and Tikiapara Foot over bridge you along with your associates being armed with deadly weapons companymitted theft in respect of batteries from empty rakes standing on the Rly.
The R.P.F Party in exercise of right of private defence fired two rounds and one of your associates being injured was arrested at the spot, while you along with your other associates fled away leaving behind six pieces of batteries, one implement of battery opener and iron rod etc.
