2 and 3 for Rs.
The High Court pointed out that the appellants had number produced the sale deed dated 19 5 69 59?
3 Khatas 49 to 54 companyprising in all an area of 213 bigas and 14 biswas.
On 16 4 57 respondents 1 to 6 purchased 926 bighas in Khewats number.
The plaintiffs alleged that they had purchased on 10 5 55 the share of Khotu and Chandu Ram in Khewat 2, Khata 26 to 44 and 6 bigas and 7 biswas in Khewat No.
The suit was decreed on 4 1 60 and on appeal the District Court companyfirmed the decree on 6 3 61.
The plaintiffs filed a pre emption suit against respondents 1 6 on the ground that they were Biswadars and companysharers in the land in dispute.
43,600/ .
Nearly a year thereafter the deed of sale was registered on 19 3 68.
Jaganmohan Reddy, J. This appeal is by certificate against the Judgment of the Punjab High Court dismissing the pre emption suit of the appellant by reversing the companycurrent Judgment of the trial companyrt and the 1st Appellate companyrt.
