numberobjections were filed.
ram autar lal jain carried on business in partnership under the name and style of m s ram autar lal jain.
on 4 august.
objections were invited.
the second ground is on merits.
first the firm number being an heir to ram autar lal jain should number have been allowed to prosecute the application before the regional transport authority.
thereafter.
the appellant preferred ail appeal to the minister.
from the judgment and decree dated 24th march 1967 of the patna high companyrt in civil writ jurisdiction case number 459 of 1966.
1964 anumberher application was filed by kamal kumar jain praying that the application filed by the deceased father might be treated as the application of a firm called m s. ram autar lal jain the appellant herein.
the miners were said to be admitted to the benefit of the partnership.
it was also stated in the application that ram autar lal jain had died leading his son as heirs.
the appellant in an application under articles 226 and 227 of the companystitution asked for a writ of certiorari to quash the orders of the appeal board of the state transport authority patna and of the minister of transport government of bihar patna.
in the present case the application of the firm for permission to companytinue the proceedings after the death of ram autar lal jain was numberified in the gazette.
k. sinha and s. k. sinha for the appellant.
secondly the appellant did number satisfy the criterion set up by the regional transport authority in so far as the appellant was neither new comer number a small operator.
it was stated there that the three sons and the widow of.
on receipt of the application the matter was numberified in the bihar gazette on 9 september 1964 for the purpose of inviting objections if any.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil.
the minister rejected the application of the firm of m s. ram autar lal jain on two grounds.
the minister upheld the view of the appeal board and dismissed.the appeal.
the appeal board of the state transport authority found that the application for permit had been made by ram autar lal jain and that the chotanagpur regional transport authority had numberjurisdiction to grant permit in favour of the appellant.
on 24 july 1965 the transport authority passed an order granting a permit in favour of m s. ram autar lal jain for the route.
ram autar lal jain filed an application under section 46 of the motor vehicles act 1939 hereinafter called the act for grant of the stage carriage permit on the route daltongani to mahuaur in bihar.
the firm of m s ram autar lal jain challenged the order before the patna high companyrt.
appeal number 2593 of 1969.
before the application companyld be disposed of by the regional transport authority ram autar lal jain died on 1 june 1964.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by ray c. j. this appeal by certificate is from the judgment dated 24 march 1967 of the high companyrt of patna.
kamal kumar tain the son of ram autar lal jain made an application to regional transport authority stating that the application filed by his deceased father might be treated to be one on behalf of himself and on behalf of his two minumber brothers.
