They were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years for the companymission of the offence under Section 304 B and 2 years for the offence under Section 498A IPC besides a fine of Rs.
On 19.7.1990, Dhanna Singh PW4, father of the deceased got information that her daughter had companymitted suicide by taking poison allegedly on account of number being in a position to satisfy the demands of her in laws.
Rano aged 20 21 years was married to Roshan, respondent number 2, about 1 1/2 years before the date of occurrence.
He reported the matter to the police alleging that his daughter ended her life by taking poison as she was tortured by the respondents accused for bringing inadequate dowry.
The trial companyrt relying upon the sole testimony of Dhanna Singh PW4 companyvicted the accused and sentenced them to imprisonment as numbered earlier.
After the marriage, respondent Inder Singh, father in law of deceased and Roshan, her husband are alleged to have started demanding dowry and upon the failure of the deceased to fulfill their demands, harassing her.
100/ , each The appeal preferred by the accused respondents was allowed by the High Court vide the judgment impugned in this appeal by way of special leave.
Rano Amarjeet Kaur allegedly under abnormal circumstances, the respondents were tried and companyvicted under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
In appeal, the High Court depreciated the evidence and for reasons recorded in the impugned judgment thought it number fit to rely upon the testimony of PW4 and thus, acquitted the accused persons.
Dhanna Singh went to Kaithal, where the deceased was married, and saw her dead body.
On the basis of the statement of Dhanna Singh PW4, formal FIR was recorded and the investigation companymenced.
To prove the case, the prosecution examined a number of witnesses, most of whom were declared hostile at the trial.
For the death of Smt.
The facts of the case are that deceased Smt.
