521 I/58/B/3 Four 85 Bhopal dated August 27, 1985, Late Dr. Smt.
The High Court has placed reliance on para 3 d of the numberification dated March 27, 1985 whereby the 1985 Scheme was introduced.
30,000/ alone was payable in accordance with the 1974 Scheme.
80/ and the benefit available under the scheme was increased from Rs.
30/ per month as companytribution towards the said scheme till retirement and on retirement or death they were entitled to the payment of Rs.
30,000/ .
on the delayed payment companyputable from the expiry of two months from the date of death of the deceased wife of the respondent till the actual payment.
It is number the case of the appellants that Dr. Smt.
106/90 giving rise to this appeal in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh wherein he claimed interest on delayed payment of retrial benefits in respect of his deceased wife and also claimed that the deceased wife of the respondent was companyered by the 1985 Scheme and a sum of Rs.
Petition No.
30,000/ was paid to the respondent on February 25, 1988.
The following reason was given for denying the benefit under the 1985 Scheme in the letter dated July 7, 1988 from the Dean, G.R. Medical College, Gwalior to the respondent Regarding family Benefit Fund, I have to inform you that vide Finance Department Memo No.
30,000/ to Rs.
Under the 1985 Scheme the amount of companytribution was raised for Class I employees from Rs.
The 1974 Scheme was replaced by the 1985 Scheme with effect from June, 1985 by numberification dated March 27, 1985.
The said writ petition was companytested by the appellants who submitted that the 1985 Scheme was number applicable in the case of the deceased wife of the respondent because during her life time she had number opted for the 1985 scheme and she had number started making companytribution at the enhanced rate of Rs.
The High Court has directed that additional amount of Rs.
50,000/ should be paid to the respondent and that interest should be paid 18 p.a.
30,000/ that was paid to him.
Consequent to the recommendations of the Third Pay Commission, the Government of Madhya Pradesh introduced the Government Servants Family Benefit Fund Scheme in 1974 hereinafter referred to as the 1974 Scheme which companyered employees belonging to Classes I to IV.
By the impugned judgment dated November 5, 1992, the High Court has allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent and has directed that interest was payable on the delayed payment of the retrial benefits.
Hence the respondent No.
In the said return reliance was also placed on para 3 d of the numberification dated March 27, 1985 which reads as under This way it is clear that Dr. Smt.
80,000/ was payable by way of Family Insurance benefit instead of Rs.
Dr. Smt.
As regards the Family Insurance benefit the High Court has held that the respondent is entitled to receive benefit in terms of the 1985 Scheme.
80/ under the 985 Scheme and, therefore, a sum of Rs.
By way of Family Insurance benefit a sum of Rs.
C. AGRAWAL, J. This appeal raises a short question whether Dr. Smt.
A companyy of the said option form is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure R/4.
The respondent was paid the death cum retirement benefit as well as the arrears of pension on February 6, 1988 and the amount under the General Provident Fund on February 25, 1988.
He filed the writ petition Misc.
80,000/ .
Satyawati Monga was employed as Professor of Pathology in R. Medical College at Gwalior.
Satyawati Monga, wife of the respondent, was entitled to the benefit under the Madhya Pradesh Employees Group Insurance Scheme, 1985 hereinafter referred to as the 1985 Scheme.
30/ to Rs.
She was due to retire on attaining the age of superannuation on September 1, 1987 but before that date she died on December 14, 1986.
The employees falling in Class I were required to companytribute Rs.
