Dated 8 3 61.
You have executed an indemnity bond in lieu of the earnest money due from you for adjustment against the companypensation admissible on your verified claim s .
Appeal by Special Leave from the Order dated the 22 8 1968 the Punjab and Haryana High Court in L.P.A. No.
An order was then passed, on 8th March, 1961, which runs as follows ORDER, Smt.
In case you intend to associate any other claimants with you in the purchase of the above mentioned property you should also submit affidavits of association duly companypleted by you and by each of your asso ciates, as per specimen attached to this office within the period specified above.
28,000/ in spite of issue of registered numberice for 2 1 61.
P J I0110.
Her bid is, therefore, cancelled and earnest money forfeited.
Rent Managing Officer, Am ritsar.
Furthermore, the allega tion that she had been called upon, presumably by the letter dated 11 9 1959 to deposit Rs.
32,000/ Rupees thirty two thousands only in respect of property No.
Sd Distt.
3200/ as earnest money out of CA No.
Yours faithfully, Sd District Rent Managing Officer, Amri tsar.
This letter was in the following terms Dear Sir Madam, I am to inform you that your bid for Rs.
XIII 18 S 14 Portion I and III Hide Market Amritsar has failed to deposit the balance sale price amounting to Rs.
Settlement Officer Jullndur may be requested to deduct Rs.
It is disputed between the parties whether this writing in hand of the margin existed on the letter received by Smt.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
for respondent No.
Despite a report in her favour by the Regional Settlement Commissioner, who investigated the facts and reported to the Chief Settlement Commissioner, that she had number been properly served, justice was denied to her by the Chief Settlement Commissioner on 26 6 1963.
The applicant may be informed accordingly and property disposed of in the next sale programme.
Rup Kaur on 18 12 1960 asking her to.
This order does number state that parties were duly heard.
B XII 18 S 14 Portion I and III Hide Market Amritsar has been accepted as per terms and companyditions of the auction.
It is disputed whether the numberice mentioned in it, alleged to have been sent to Smt.
appear on 2 1 1961, was received by the companytesting respond ent.
28,000/ was, on the face of it, untrue.
Announced.
Roop Kaur through her attorney Shri S. Grewal the auction purchaser of unit No.
Even if the learned Single Judges finding that it was number received at all by her were number companyrect, the time fixed for her appearance was too short.
Sen and H.K. Puri, for the appellant K. Mehta, P.N. Puri and K.R.Nagaraja.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by BEG, J. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgement of a Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab Haryana.
32,000/ , being the highest, was accepted and this fact was companymuni cated to her by a letter dated 1 1960 1 S.C.R. 890.
dismissing in litnine an appeal against a judgment and order of a learned single Judge of that Court by which a Writ Petition made to the High Court had been granted.
333 of 1969.
427 of 1968 .
11th September, 1959, sent through her son and general attorney M.S. Grewal.
The balance of the purchase money, if any, found due from you, after scrutiny of your companypensation application and that of your associates will be companymunicated to you in due companyrse.
For this purpose please furnish if you have number already done at the time of auction the registration number of your companypensation application, so as to reach this office within seven days of the issue of this letter.
