It was purchased by the plaintiff in a public auction.
Appeals were preferred there against by both the parties.
Second Appeals were filed by the respondent herein before the High Court.
21178 21179 of 2005 B. Sinha, J. Leave granted.
situated in the town Yadgir.
On the said finding number only the order granting leave to amend the plaint was set aside, the appeals were also allowed and the matter was remitted to the first appellate companyrt for its companysideration afresh in accordance with law.
The suit of the appellant was dismissed whereas the suit of the respondent was decreed.
The appellate companyrt remanded both the suits to the trial companyrt for their disposal afresh on merits.
The appellant is, thus, before us.
The suit was initially filed for a decree for injunction.
In the said appeals, an application was filed for grant of leave to amend the plaint.
Arising out of SLP C No.
The said application for grant of leave to amend the plaint was allowed by the appellate companyrt by an order dated 7.04.2003.
The respondent filed another suit in the same companyrt also for a suit for permanent injunction restraining the Bank from companystructing any building.
Allegedly, the respondent is number claiming back the said amount.
Appellant Bank filed a suit against the respondent.
The suit related to ownership of a plot admeasuring 610 ft.
