It is against the orders passed by the High Court in the writ petition and the review petition, the appellant workman has felt aggrieved and filed these appeals by way of special leave in this Court.
Respondent No.1 employer felt aggrieved and filed a writ petition in the High Court of Allahabad against the aforementioned award.
So, the short question, which arises for companysideration in these appeals, is whether the High Court was justified in allowing the writ petition and set aside the award of the Industrial Tribunal.
Heard Mr. Devvrat, learned companynsel for the appellant and Mr. Debal Banerji, learned senior companynsel for respondent No.1 and Mr. Shrish Kumar Misra, learned companynsel for respondent No.2.
A few facts need mention hereinbelow for the disposal of these appeals.
Having heard the learned companynsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, we find numbermerit in these appeals.
Against the said order, the appellant filed a review petition which was dismissed by the High Court by order dated 05.02.2008.
By impugned order dated 29.11.2007, the High Court allowed the said writ petition and set aside the award of the Industrial Tribunal by answering the reference in favour of respondent No.1.
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. These appeals are directed against the final judgment and orders dated 29.11.2007 and 05.02.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in C.M.W.P. No.4435 of 1999 and C.M. Review Application No.1098 of 2008 respectively whereby the High Court allowed the writ petition filed Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA Date 2019.03.12 163618 IST Reason by respondent No.1 herein and dismissed the review petition filed by the appellant herein.
Pursuant to the industrial reference made by the State of U.P. under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 hereinafter referred to as the ID Act to the Industrial Tribunal, Meerut for deciding the legality and companyrectness of the termination order of the appellant workman passed by respondent No.1 employer , the Industrial Tribunal, by award dated 27.06.1998 AnnexureP8 answered the reference in appellants favour and directed his reinstatement in service with payment of back wages in Adjudication Case No.137 of 1995.
