The Division Bench in Letters Patent Appeal refused to interfere and the appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed in limine.
It is his further case that he was number allowed to join duty even though he was marking his presence from 13.08.1984 to 23.08.1984.
Aggrieved against the orders dated 15.11.1984 and 08.03.1988, the respondent filed a writ petition in the High Court in the year 1991 i.e. after a gap of about 3 years.
It is also his case that numberice which was sent to the respondent was deliberately sent on wrong address.
He was charge sheeted under Rule 16 of the Rajasthan Civil Services Classification, Control and Appeal Rules, 1958.
The respondent herein joined the services of the Government of Rajasthan in the Cooperative Department.
He was promoted as UDC in March, 1965.
With the above said observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
He filed the appeal which was dismissed vide order dated 08.03.1988.
The enquiry was held and the respondent attended the enquiry.
According to him, he became sick and companyld number attend the office for the period from 09.01.1978 to 19.01.1981.
He applied for 3 days leave while he was working as UDC.
His services were terminated by way of publication in newspaper Dainik Navjyoti dated 27.08.1984.
Dr. AR.
Lakshmanan, J. The above appeal arises from the final judgment and order dated 13.12.2001 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan in Division Bench Civil Special Appeal No.
1073 of 2001 wherein the appeal filed by the State of Rajasthan was dismissed by the High Court by a number speaking order.
The order passed by the Division Bench in Letters Patent Appeal reads as follows The only grievance made out by the learned companynsel for the appellants is that the direction of the learned Single Judge for giving a lesser penalty to the respondent was number called for.
