While these aforesaid proceedings were pending, the property which was the subject matter of the suit was sold through an auction sale for satisfaction of arrears of agricultural income tax dues against Kochan Kani.
78 of 1959 was decreed, the decree was put in execution and in the execution proceedings the plaintiff obtained possession of the property.78 of 1959 for declaration that they are the legal heirs of Kochan Kani.
78 of 1959 was decreed.
It appears that both the suits were companysolidated and a receiver was appointed by the companyrt.
74 of 1956 was dismissed.
1 of B schedule property to the suit was sold to the predecessor in interest of the appellant whereas item No.
In the year 1956 after his death, his nephews Shankaran Kani and Ors.
2 of the schedule was purchased by Israil Titus from the heirs of Israil Nadar.
One Kochan Kani was the owner of the property in dispute.
One Israil Nadar purchased the said property at the said auction.
74 of 1956 praying to set aside the revenue proceedings.
Against the aforesaid judgment, the appeals were filed.
They also filed a second suit No.
Original suit No.
However, original suit No.
brought a suit being original suit No.
Subsequently, one portion of the property described as item No.
