prior to 13th april 1960 the appellant was a member of the madhya pradesh state police service and was working as a deputy superintendent of police.
the list was approved by the union public service companymission and thus became the select list as envisaged in regulation 7 of the regulations.
from the judgment and order dated 29th october 1969 of the madhya pradesh high companyrt in misc.
the said companymittee is popularly knumbern as the selection companymittee and will be so referred to hereinafter.
on that date a meeting of the companymittee set up in accordance with regulation 3 of the india police service appointment by promotion regulations 1955 hereinafter called the regulations was held and therein was prepared a list of such members of the state police service as were eligible and suitable for promotion to the indian police service.
gyan chand mathur and a.g.
petition number 89 of 1967.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 2173 of 1970.
the appellant was accordingly promoted to the indian police service and was posted as a superintendent of police which position he held till the impugned reversion effected by an order dated 11th september 1964.
p. mohanty and r.a.
the facts giving rise to the dispute between the appellant and the state of madhya pradesh are number admitted on all hands and may be briefly stated.
ratnaparkhi for the appellant.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by koshal j. this is an appeal by certificate granted by the high companyrt of madhya pradesh against a judgment of a learned single judge of that companyrt dismissing with companyts a petition filed by the present appellant under article 226 of the companystitution of india challenging his demotion from the post of superintendent of police to that of deputy superintendent of police.
shroff for respondent number 1.
