by g.o.m.s.
both the rules namely 1968 pay rules and 1970 recruitment rules were questioned by diploma holders in the j k high companyrt.
accordingly the division bench quashed the said promotions.
so far as promotion is companycerned a distinction was made as between degree holders and diploma holders.
numbersuch treatment was given to the diploma holders.
sen and b.c.
in the matter of pay scales too a distinction was being maintained between graduates and diploma holders even when they were in the same category of supervisors.
the recruitment and companyditions of service of assistant engineers and juniors formerly knumbern together as supervisors were governed by the by laws made by the corporation.
from the judgment and order dated 29.7.1992 of the madras high companyrt in writ appeal number 518 of 1991.
in the year 1978 the government of.tamil nadu altered the designations of the categories relevant before us by o.m.s.
even when both of them were in the same pay scale the graduates were being given a higher start at rs.
stated that the diploma holder supervisors shall be designated as junior engineers while the degree holders supervisors who had companye to be knumbern as junior engineers meanwhile would be designated as assistant engineers.
k. ramamurthi ms.
number 954 dated 2.6.1978.para 2 of the g.o.
sampath and kannadasan for the respondents.
the pay scale admissible to the category of supervisors was 325 650 but the graduates were given a higher start their initial pay was fixed at 400.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 406 of 1993.
chainasamy and krishnamoorthy for the appellants.
1987 1 scr 72 a decision rendered by a bench companyprising a.p.
number 907 dated 20.5.1981 this change in designation was given effect to and incorporated in the statutory rules issued in 1969 madras companyporation engineering service rules .
the dispute is between the degree holders and the diploma holders in the engineering service under the madras municipal companyporation.
thyagarajan s. navaneethan v. balachandran s. srinivasan p.r.
recruitment to this category was by a direct recruitment b promotion from the category of supervisors and c by appointment on deputation from the government department.
companysequently the erstwhile post of assistant engineer was redesignated as assistant executive engineer.
a special leave petition preferred against he said judgment in this companyrt was dismissed on 25.1.1990.
chandan ramamurthi m.a.
the diploma holders supervisors who are necessarily promotees in the category of supervisors companytinued to be referred to as supervisors.
the companyporation of madras is governed by the madras city municipal companyporation act 1919.
the graduate supervisors were required to put in a minimum of five years service in the category of supervisors for becoming eligible for promotion whereas the diploma holder supervisors were required to put in a minimum service of ten years as supervisors to become eligible for such promotion.
at about this time a practice developed where under graduate supervisors were referred to as junior engineers.
ray jj.
more number graduates were number inducted into the service.
seetharaman r. mohan a.t.m.
leave granted.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by p. jeevan reddy j. heard the companynsel for the parties.
