4, Subramani caused injury on his left hand.
1, Velu Velmurugan has been found guilty under Sections 302 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and two years respectively, while other appellants have been held guilty under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous Crl.
1, Velu purchased the aforesaid land from Ranga Iyer and asked the informant and his family members to vacate the same but they did number accede to his request.
Injured were taken to the Villupuram Government Hospital where after initial treatment, they were referred to JIPMER Hospital, Pondicherry for further treatment but Ramachandran died on way to the hospital and was pronounced dead by the doctors Crl.
On the basis of the aforesaid information, case under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324 and 302 was registered against the appellants and other two accused persons since acquitted .
According to the informant, three acres of land situated in his village was leased out to his family by its owner Ranga Iyer 40 years ago and since then they were cultivating the same.
There Appellant No.
1, Velu caused injury on his ankle and knee and appellant Ramakrishnan beat him with the stick on his left shoulder and right knee.
On appeal the High Court set aside the companyviction of Mahalingam and maintained the companyviction of Appellant No.
The trial companyrt relying on the evidence of PW 1, Subramani, and the dying declaration of the deceased Ramachandran recorded by PW 19, Dr. Balasubramaniyan held that the prosecution has been able to prove its case beyond all reasonable doubt against the appellants and the accused Mahalingam but acquitted Balasundram of all the charges leveled against him.
1047 of 2009 Appellant Nos.
A. No.
A. No.
Appellant Subramani is alleged to have given a stick blow on the informants right arm.
3 and 4 under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and that of Appellant No.
to 1300 hrs in the night of 5th/6th of March, 2002.
1, Velu met him and asked him to see that his brother Ramachandran Crl.
Prosecution case further is that informants elder brother Narayanswami was done to death by men of Balasundaram in the year 1993 due to the aforesaid dispute.
Thereafter, according to the prosecution, the informant returned to his home, took food and left for Chennai along with his bother Ramachandran and when reached village Kandamanadi, opposite Sudhakar Engineering Workshop, Appellants Velu, Magesh, Ramakrishnan and Subramani along with another accused since acquitted came in a group armed with knives and casurina sticks.
Instead they filed civil suit claiming right over the land which is pending adjudication before the companyrt.
1047 of 2009 at the JIPMER Hospital.
Prosecution companymenced on the basis of the report given by PW 1, Subramani before the Sub Inspector of Police on 6th of March, 2002 at 1.00 A.M. at JIPMER Hospital, Pondicherry.
It was protested by the informant, whereupon Appellant No.
That is how the appellants are before us.
1, Velu under Sections 302 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code but set aside the companyviction of Crl.
It is the case of the prosecution that on 5th of March, 2002, the informant came from Chennai where he was working as a Junior Assistant in Survey Department to his village.
This appeal, by special leave has been preferred by the appellants against their companyviction and sentence.
1, 2, 4 and 5.
After assaulting Ramachandran and the informant the accused persons fled away from the place of occurrence.
Altogether six persons were put on trial and in the present appeal we are companycerned with the four appellants who were Accused Nos.
A. No.
In order to bring home the charge the prosecution examined altogether 21 witnesses besides a large number of documents were exhibited.
Appellant No.
1047 of 2009 imprisonment for two years.
1, Velu gave knife blow on the head of Ramachandran whereas Appellant No.
Appellants denied to have companymitted any offence and claimed to be tried.
They were taken to the Government Hospital at Villupuram where they were examined by PW 19, Dr. Balasubramanian at 5.50 P.M. and 5.55 P.M. and after giving initial treatment they were referred to JIPMER Hospital at Pondicherry.
A. No.
It has been alleged that Appellant No.
After usual investigation police submitted charge sheet and ultimately the appellants along with two other accused persons were companymitted to the Court of Sessions to face trial.
The occurrence has taken place at about 5.30 P.M. on 5th of March, 2002 in which PW 1, Subramani and the deceased Ramachandran sustained serious injuries.
In the year 1985, according to the prosecution, Balasundaram since acquitted who happens to be the father of Appellant No.
