They gave gandasi blows, which landed on the legs of the deceased.
Since the accused persons pleaded innocence, the trial was held.
Acquitted accused Gurcharan Singh raised a lalkara exhortation that Aaj Isko Bach Kar Jane Mat Dena.
PB , a formal FIR Ex.
At that time, his father Amrik Singh hereinafter referred to as deceased was going about 10 paces ahead of them on the same foot way for his domestic work.
An incised wound of 6 cms x 2 cms x scalp deep over the top of the scalp.
As a result, the deceased fell down on the road.
PD /4 was prepared on 3.11.1994 itself by ASI Kartar Singh PW 9 .
On dissection, infiltration was present and there was numberfracture.
Thereafter accused appellant Hardeep Singh gave dattar blow, hitting the deceased on his head.
His turban also went off his head and fell on the ground.
State questioned his acquittal.
Dr. Narinder Chaudhary PW 4 companyducted the post mortem Ex.
Complainant Sukhdev Singh and his mother Pritam Kaur followed them and raised hue and cry.
Complainant Sukhdev Singh and his mother Pritam Kaur raised a hue and cry saying Mar Dia Mar Dia.
Soon thereafter, his sons appellants Harjinder Singh and Jaswinder Singh inflicted gandasi injuries on the deceased with an intention to companymit his murder.
After that the deceased was dragged by all the four accused inside the house of accused appellant Harjinder Singh.
Thereafter, acquitted respondent Gurcharan Singh and accused appellant Jaswinder Singh caused further injuries with gandasi on the arms of the deceased.
His statement was recorded by Kartar Singh, Incharge, Police Post, Kariwala, on 3.11.1994 itself.
As soon as deceased reached in front of the house of one Parlhand Singh son of Karnail Singh, then all of a sudden, acquitted accused Gurcharan Singh, armed with gandasi, Hardeep Singh, armed with dattar, Harjinder Singh armed with gandasi and Jaswinder Singh also armed with gandasi, emerged from a street known as schoolwali gali.
Infiltration was present under the injury.
The companyplainant and his mother looked at the deceased who had succumbed to the injuries.
By the companymon judgment the High Court dismissed the Criminal Appeal filed by the State and the Criminal Revision filed by the companyplainant while dismissing the appeal filed by the appellants also.
PB/1 under Sections 302/34 IPC was registered by ASI Baljit Singh PW3 at Police Station, Ding, at 6.50 PM.
On hearing their numberse all the aforesaid four accused, namely, Gurcharan Singh, Hardeep Singh, Harjinder Singh and Jaswinder Singh, ran away with their weapons towards the village side.
On receipt of ruqa Ex.
As numbered above, the appellants were companyvicted while Gurcharan Singh was acquitted.
On dissection, underlying bone tibia was fractured and infiltration was present.
On dissection, there was fracture of the left parietal bone.
He found as many as 14 injuries on the dead body.
The companyplainant, leaving behind his mother near the dead body at the spot, went to the police post to lodge a report.
PD of the deceased on 4.11.1994 at about 10.15 AM.
Four persons faced trial for alleged companymission of offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in short the IPC .
One of them i.e. Gurcharan Singh was acquitted by the learned Sessions Judge, Sirsa.
He was followed by accused appellant Harjinder Singh, who also inflicted a gandasi blow on the head of the deceased.
After companypletion of the investigation, charge sheet was filed.
An incised wound of 8 cms x 1.5 cm x muscle deep, anterior and middle third to the right leg.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows Sukhdev Singh PW 7 lodged FIR at 5.30 PM on 3.11.1994 that on 3.11.1994 at about 4.30 PM, he was going with his mother Pritam Kaur to visit the house of his fathers sister on the eve of Diwali festival.
He sent a special report through Constable Bhoop Singh PW 5 on the same day to JMIC, Sirsa.
Corresponding cut was present in the kachha.
A detailed inquest report Ex.
Infiltration was present underlying the injury.
Appeal was filed by the State and the present appellants and the revision was filed by the companyplainant.
Lateral aspect of the right knee joint.
They are as under A V shape incised wound each limb measuring 8 cms x 2cms x brain deep over the left parietal region 8 cms away from the pinna of the left ear.
By a companymon judgment two appeals and one criminal Revision were disposed of.
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division bench of the Punjab Haryana High Court dismissing the appeal filed by the appellants.
Similarly the companyplainant, PW7 also filed the revision petition seeking enhancement of the sentence of companyvicted accused persons to death sentence, apart from questioning of acquittal of Gurcharan Singh.
