The respondent was detained on July 31, 1989 under Section 3 1 iii of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act.
When he challenged the order of detention, the High Court in the impugned order dated July 25, 1990 made in W.P. No.2029 of 1990 set aside the order of detention on the ground that the delay in number consideration of the representation for one month, i.e., from February 20, 1990 to March 15, 1990, was number explained and also on the ground that companyy of the report of the sponsoring authority had number been supplied to the detenu which violates Article 22 5 of the Constitution.
Leave granted.
