100 160/ .
On 1st January, 1991 when the post of Accountant became vacant, Ashok Kumar, 4th respondent had staked his claim for companysideration of his case for promotion companytending that he was appointed on November 29, 1976 as octroi moharrar in the pay scale of Rs.
By the proceedings of the companypetent authority, the post of octroi moharrar and clerks were redesignated as clerks in year 1982.
110 250/ and that he was posted as a clerk on March 1, 1984.
Consequently, when he approached the High Court of Himachal Pradesh in W.P. No.
His claim was nagatived.
He being senior to the appellant, is better situated to be companysidered for the post of accountant.
Consequently he was working as a clerk from November 29, 1976.
Leave granted.
The post of clerk as a feeder post for companysideration to the vacancy of accountant.
The appellant admittedly was appointed as a clerk on Pension Rules, 1950 for short, the Rules would stand attracted to the respondents and, therefore, the respondents are number entitled to any pension in excess of the pension calculable on the last substantive pay drawn by them.
267/91 by order dated November 22, 1991, the High Court accepted the claim and allowed the writ petition directing the Union of India to companysider his case for promotion as an accountant vis a vis the claim of Kuldip Chand, which found favour with the authorities.
