It is the case of the petitioner that he made a representation to denotify the part of the land on the ground that he was willing to give 5 out of 11 cents, free of companyt.
Admittedly numberification under section 4 1 of the land Acquisition Act, 1894 for short, the Act was issued.
The District Judge vacated the interim injunction granted by the trial companyrt and in the revision the High Court has dismissed it.
The special leave petition filed by the petitioners was dismissed by this Court on November 21, 1994.
Since they were number been companysidered, he filed the civil suit for an injunction for restraining them from interfering with his possession.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition on January 17,1990.
We do number find any illegality in the order passed by the High Court on January 20,1997 in CRP No.
He claims that the secretary had examined the matter and favourably recommended for companysideration.
The admitted facts are that the acquisition of the petitioners land has become final.
The petitioners had challenged the numberification in the year 1988.
Thus, this special leave petition.
4097/96.
