The deceased almost died instantaneously after he was taken to the hospital he was declared dead.
Thus this appeal by special leave.
This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Division Bench of the Punjab Haryana High Court made in Criminal Appeal No.424 of 1985 or September 3, 1986.
Thereafter a report was lodged at about 11.30 p.m. by Medu, PW 9.
Investigation was made.
In the quarrel the intervener had separated them.
Pursuant to that, when Rajpal deceased was proceeding by the side of the house of the accused at 5.45 p.m., there ensued a quarrel between Subhash and Rajpal, number deceased, and other.
The case of the prosecution is that on September 21, 1984 at at about 4.30 p.m. Smt.
While deceased was proceeding towards his house at 6 p.m., it is the case of the prosecution that all the accused, who were standing near the house of Medu, one of the accused, had attacked the deceased and when other parties had companye to intervene, they were also beaten up.
Sunita who had drawn water stealthily from the well dug by the prosecution party.
The trial Court acquitted five accused and companyvicted A1 to A8 for various offences, including the offences under Section 302 read with Section On appeal, the High Court set aside the companyvictions and acquitted them of all the charges.
Chandro, a witness of the prosecution, had a quarrel with one Smt.
The accused were arrested and were charged for various offences, including the offences under Sections 148, 302/149, 324, 325, etc.
