A suit was filed by the respondent herein against Kapoor Chand for specific performance of a companytract for sale.
applied to be brought on record as legal representatives.
835of 1997.
Hence this appeal by special leave.
The trial companyrt rejected this application against which a revision was filed by the appellant which was also dismissed by the High Court.
During the pendency of the suit Kapoor Chand died and his wife, sons etc.
It was alleged that Kapoor Chand had entered into an agreement to sell the property in dispute to the plaintiff respondent, M s. Paras Finance Co. In that agreement Kapoor Chand stated that the property in dispute was his self acquired property.
The Revision Petition was filed in the High Court against an order dated 6.8.1997 passed by the trial companyrt whereby the application filed by the revisionists under Order 22 Rule 4 2 CPC read with Order 1 Rule 10 CPC was rejected.
The appellants are the legal representatives of late Kapoor Chand.
MARKANDEY KATJU, J. This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and order dated 7.1.2000 in S.B. Civil Revision Petition No.
Heard learned companynsel for the parties and perused the record.
After they were impleaded they filed an application under Order 22 Rule 4 2 read with Order 1 Rule 10 CPC praying inter alia, that they should be permitted to file additional written statement and also be allowed to take such pleas which are available to them.
