Further bout fought by the temple respondent before the Letters Patent Bench of the High Court bore results inasmuch as the Bench, on fresh reconciliation of those two documents, bearing in mind the other surrounding circumstances, came to the view that the grant was intended to be in favour of the temple and number to the Archaka personally.
A Letters Patent Appeal, as permitted under the Letters Patent, is numbermally an intra court appeal whereunder the Letters Patent Bench, sitting as a Court of Correction.
Title to 29 acres of agricultural land, its possession and recovery of mense profits, was sought by the respondent temple from the appellants.
A learned Single Judge of the High Court, in appeal, in re appraising the evidence adduced, prominently paid attention to two documents companytaining certain recitals, which partly supported the case of the plaintiff temple respondent and partly that of the defendants appellants.
The trial companyrt, as also the learned Single Judge held that the grant was personal to the Archaka and thus the alienations made by him thereafter were in order.
The result thereof was that the decision of the trial companyrt dismissing the suit was upheld by the learned Single Judge.
The dispute plainly was whether the grant made in favour of the Archaka was meant to be companyferred on him personally or on the temple through the Archaka.
Against the orders of the trial companyrt, first appeal lay before the High Court, both on facts as well as law.
He made an attempt to gather the predominant intention of the companycerned authorities while preparing those documents, by looking at both of them integrally.
The trial companyrt dismissed the suit.
Such is number an appeal against an order of a subordinate Court.
Reading them together, the learned Single Judge aimed to reconcile the entries instead of holding them as inconsistent.
companyrects its own orders in exercise of the same jurisdiction as was vested in the Single Bench.
