On the request of the appellants, the matter was referred to the Arbitration.
Petition No.1 of 1991.
The respondent Railway administration raised the bills for the period 1.11.1963 to 31.3.1975.
The miscellaneous application was preferred by the Railways before the Division Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court against the said order of the District Judge.
NON REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPEALLTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs.5456 5457 OF 2000.
The objections raised by the Railways under section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 were rejected by the learned District Judge and the award was made the rule of the companyrt.
The appellants paid the bill under protest on 22.6.1976.
The Arbitrator decided the claim in favour of the appellants.
The appellants filed an application under section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940.
Appeal No.
The Railway administration on 24.8.1968 informed the appellants that the maintenance charges would be levied at the rate of 4 per annum instead of 2.
Brief facts relevant to dispose of these appeals are as under The appellant Satna Stone Lime Company Ltd., Satna entered into an agreement with the General Manager, G.I.P. Railway, Government of India, on 23.3.1897, whereby a siding was provided to the companypany for clearance of its goods.
Satna Stone Lime Co. Ltd., M.P. etc.
1058 of 1995 and Misc.
The agreement was revised from time to time and the last such agreement was executed on 1.10.1942 hereinafter called the agreement .
Appellant s Versus Union of India Another etc.
Respondent s JUDGMENT Dalveer Bhandari, J. These appeals are directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur dated 6.7.1999 delivered in Misc.
