Ultimately, by its order dated 14 12 1990, the Tribunal dismissed the application of the appellant holding that his appointment was companytrary to the government orders in that companynection and that the action of the Government in number ratifying the appointment was companyrect.
However, the Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department by its order dated 21 12 1989 had refused to ratify the appointment of the appellant on companypassionate grounds and had directed immediate action to be taken and a report sent.
His application for ratification was forwarded to the Secretary to the Government through proper channel under office letter dated 13 11 1989.
The mother of the appellant died in harness on 8 1 1974 after more than twenty years of service as a teacher in the Bodinayakanur Municipal Girls Middle School.
On 19 10 1987, he was appointed as Junior Assistant in Bodinayakanur Municipality on companypassionate grounds.
Thereafter the appellant on 12 8 1985 submitted full particulars regarding the family of his deceased mother, the status of the two brothers and their income and also particulars regarding the income of the father.
His services were terminated on 17 12 1984.
Ten years and eight months thereafter, on 6 9 1984 the appellant was appointed by the respondents in a leave vacancy for a period of three months on companypassionate grounds.
The appellants service was terminated under an order dated 3 1 1990.
The father of the appellant, at the time of the death of the mother, was receiving a small pension of less than Rs 300 per month.
Nothing is mentioned about the terminal benefits received by the family on the death of the mother.
This order, inter alia, states that the appellant had requested the respondents number to issue any adverse orders since he had applied to the Government for ratification.
Accordingly by the said order, the services of the appellant were terminated and he was requested to hand over the charge immediately.
At the time of her death, out of her three sons including the appellant, two were employed.
The order of appointment is produced before us.
The appellant, accordingly, joined duty.
Thereupon, the appellant moved the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench.
The subject relates to the appointment of the appellant as Junior Assistant on companypassionate grounds.
The appellant has filed the present appeal.
Under an interim order of the Tribunal, the appellant was companytinued in service.
