Hence, the original plaintiff has preferred the present appeal.
It appears that the suit land was declared as ceiling surplus land in the year 1988 and companysequently the same was acquired by the Government.
It appears that the original defendant number1, an ExPolice Officer.
The judgment and order passed by the first appellate Court, companyfirming the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court dismissing the suit, has been further companyfirmed by the High Court, by the impugned judgment and order.
36/1998 before the first appellate Court.
173/2003, by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the appellant herein plaintiff and has companyfirmed the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court dismissing the suit, companyfirmed by the first appellate Court, the original plaintiff has preferred the present appeal.
3 to 8.
illegally entered into the suit land on 09.04.1995.
At this stage, it is required to be numbered that so far as original defendant number.
That the said suit was filed in the month of July, 1995.
The original plaintiff also prayed for a decree of declaration, declaring that he has a right, title and interest over the suit land.
Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court, the original defendant number1 filed Title Appeal No.
That thereafter, the original plaintiff mutated the land in his name vide order dated 18.12.1991 in Mutation Case No.94/91 92, and accordingly the name of the original plaintiff was recorded in the Sadar Jamabandi.
The original plaintiff also prayed for permanent injunction.
Therefore, the original plaintiff immediately filed a suit in the Court of learned Civil Judge, Junior division, which was numbered as Title Suit No.
3.2 That the learned trial Court decreed the suit by its judgment and decree dated 28.08.1998 specifically holding that the original plaintiff purchased the suit land by valid document and has got right, title and interest over the suit land.
2 to 4 are companycerned, as such, they did number challenge the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court holding that the original plaintiff purchased the suit land by valid document.
230/1995, praying for giving possession of the suit land by evicting defendant number1.
That the first appellate Court, by its judgment and order dated 15.09.1999, allowed the said appeal preferred by original defendant number1 and remanded back the matter to the learned trial Court, framing an additional issue to the effect that Whether the suit land was declared ceiling surplus land and as such it was acquired by the Government in the year 1988 and as such whether the vendor had any saleable right to sell the suit land to the plaintiff on 6.1.1990.
R.SHAH, J. Leave granted.
Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied by the impugned judgment and order dated 17.07.2015 passed by the High Court at Guwahati in R.S.A. No.
The facts leading to the present appeal in nut and shell are as under 3.1 That the appellant herein original plaintiff hereinafter referred to as the original plaintiff purchased the suit land by a registered sale deed dated 06.01.1990 from Late Pranab Kumar Bora, husband of original defendant number2 and father of original defendant number.
