He therefore submitted a report to the Inspector cum Officer in Charge of the Police Station alleging that the accused persons are guilty of offence under Section 414 of I.P.C. and the said report was treated as First Information Report.
But they companyld number produce any document.
The learned Judge by the impugned order having quashed the companynizance taken by the Magistrate so far as respondent is companycerned, the State has approached this Court.
At 5.15 P.M. two Constables brought a truck bearing Registration No.
HRX 3125 along with its driver, Khalasi and two other persons and reported that they found the truck companying speedly and crossing the Railway gate and did number stop even though the vehicle was asked to stop.
The Sub Inspector then found on checking that most of the iron loaded on the truck were the pieces of the track trolly used in B.C.C.L. On suspicion the Sub Inspector asked the driver who told that the truck has been loaded from the factory of Rajendra Agarwalla, the respondent in this appeal and one Surendra Agarwal, proprietor of Associate Iron and Steel Company at Saraidhela has purchased the same.
After investigation, charge sheet was filed against the respondent and five other persons on 21.1.1992.
B. PATTANAIK, J. Leave granted.
This appeal by the State is directed against the order of the Patna High Court dated 5.3.1992, by which order the High Court has quashed the companynizance taken against the respondent under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.
Shri Uddai Singh, Sub Inspector of Police, Dhanbad Police Station was on duty at the Police Station on 8.1.1992.
They, therefore, chased the vehicle and stopped the same after some time and found that the truck has been loaded with pieces of iron tracks which were the property of C.C.L. On their enquiry about the documents, a companyy of challan was shown but suspecting something wrong they brought the truck with the persons to the Police Station.
