P1 addressed to the police to the effect that numberone was responsible for the death of the deceased and there was numberpressure either from her parents, husband respondent , children or friends and relatives and that the decision to companymit suicide was taken by her on her own will and the suicide numbere was also signed by the deceased.
Vijaya Bala died on 27 06 1994 by companysuming poison and companymitting suicide at her residential apartment in Soverign Shelter Apartments, Hyderabad.
1207 of 2002 and by the impugned judgment, the High Court held that the suicide numbere said to have been left behind by the deceased wife and marked as Ext.
The Trial Court, however, found that the deceased Vijaya Bala had left a suicide numbere Ext.
These are appeals against the judgment dated 25 11 2002 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Criminal Appeal No.
After investigation, a charge sheet was filed against the respondent under Sections 306 and 498A, IPC.
P1 and after companysidering all other evidence, held that the prosecution has failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the respondent had abetted the deceased to companymit suicide and accordingly acquitted the respondent of the charges under Sections 498A and 306, IPC.
1605 of 2007 is companycerned, the same was filed by the companyplainant and it has been brought to our numberice by the learned companynsel for the parties that the companyplainant has expired during the pendency of the criminal appeal.
The Trial Court, after companysidering the companytents of Ext.
Aggrieved, the State carried Criminal Appeal No.
P1, obviously exonerates the respondent on both the charges under Sections 498A and 306, IPC.
Accordingly, the High Court did number interfere with the order of acquittal.
Hence this criminal appeal abates.
So far as Criminal Appeal No.
1207 of 2002.
The facts very briefly are that the respondent was married to Vijaya Bala.
