Investigation was carried on by an Inspec tor in the Crime Branch of the Criminal Investigation De partment.
From the Judgment and Order dated 10.3.1987 of the Allahabad High Court in C.M.W.P. No.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICHON Civil Appeal No.
However, on receiv ing an information in this behalf from one Hiralal and Vinod Kumar, the said gold was recovered by the respondent but was misappropriated.
Before however any chargesheet companyld be submitted, the respondent filed the aforesaid writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the legality of the inves tigation by an officer junior in rank to him.
P. Rana and R. Ramchandran for the Respondent.
Gopal Subramaniam and Mrs. S. Dikshit for the Appellants.
430 of 1989.
The respondent Surinder Pal Singh who was a Station Officer of Police Station Shikohabad was promoted as a Deputy Superintendent of Police on 20th June, 1977.
15545 of 1984 raises a question about the interpretation and scope of Regulation 486 I 3 of the U.P. Police Regulations, hereinafter re ferred to as the Regulations.
15545 of 1984.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by OJHA, J. This appeal by special leave preferred against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 10th March, 1987 in Civil Misc.
Writ Petition No.
A First information Report was lodged against him in the Police Station Shikohabad on 8th June, 1980 by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption, Agra Circle under sections 409/392/203/218/342/120 B of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 5 2 of the Prevention of Corruption Act as also under sections 4/20 of the Treas ure Trove Act.
