Annamalai Ammal died on 26th July, 1968.
The suit for eviction, decreed by the District Court and the High Court, is number before us.
Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated 29 1 1976 of the Madras High Court in Second Appeal No468/75 .
After the death of Annamalai Ammal, the plaintiffs respond ents, as remainder men, sued to evict the appellant, the cultivating tenant, on the ground that his tenancy rights did number enure beyond the life time of Annamalai Ammal.
523 of 1976.
She had, however, during her life time, inducted a tenant, G. Ponniah Thevar, the appel lant before us, by means of a lease dated 27th March, 1961.
482 of 1927.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICION Civil Appeal No.
Under the terms of the companypromise decree, some land was given to Annamalai Ammal for enjoyment during her life time, and, thereafter, absolutely to the sons of the second defendant of suit No.
That suit ended in a companypromise dated 6th July, 1935.
482 of 1927 in the Court of the District Munsif, Periyakulam, for partitioning the properties of the deceased, impleading the other widow and a nephew of the deceased Annammalai Pillai as defendants.
S. Ramarmurthi and Mrs. S. Gopalakrishnan, for the appel lant.
S. Krishnamoorthi Iyer, K. Rajendra Chowdhary and Miss Veena Devi Khanna, for respondents Nos.
The undisputed facts are one Annamalai Pillai died leaving behind two widows, namely, Annamalai Ammal and Veerayee.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by BEG, J. This appeal by special leave raises quite a simple question interpretation of the provisions of the Madras Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955, hereinafter referred to as the act which we think, have been ignored entirely by the Madras high companyrt in the judgment under appeal.
