The challenge laid out by the appellant to his order of retirement before the High Court was unsuccessful and thus the present appeal.
The appellant while posted as a Chief Judicial Magistrate Signature Not Verified granted acquittal to the accused on 17.09.2007 in Criminal Case Digitally signed by MEENAKSHI KOHLI Date 2019.12.10 164406 IST Reason No.4670 of 2005 State vs. Mohd.
NAVIN SINHA, J. The appellant, a judicial officer of the rank of Additional District and Sessions Judge, assails his order of companypulsory retirement dated 03.05.2016 at 56 years of age under Rule 56 C of the U. P. Fundamental Rules hereinafter referred to as the Rules .
After calling for companyments from the appellant, and perusing the judgement and the order of reversal in appeal, the Administrative Judge on 24.02.2009 recommended an enquiry.
A companyplaint was lodged against the appellant with regard to the acquittal.
