Accordingly, the learned Single Judge quashed the declaration Under Section 6.
The Division Bench dismissed the L.P.A. on the ground that there was inordinate delay of more than 200 days in filing the appeal.
Instead of filing the appeal, he had given the opinion two months thereafter on November 4, 1990 that it was number a fit case.
We have heard learned companynsel on both sides.
Thus, this appeal by special leave.
Leave granted.
The first question relates to the delay in filing the L.P.A. It is seen that learned single Judge passed the order on March 5, 1990 and certified companyy of the judgment was obtained by the companynsel appearing for the Government on July 12, 1990 and a letter was addressed immediately on July 31, 1990 directing the Government pleader to file the appeal.
Accordingly, he did number file the appeal.
We have heard Shri N.N. Goswami, learned senior companynsel for the appellants and Shri G.L. Sanghi, learned senior companynsel for the respondants.
When the matter was re examined since a large number of cases were involved, new Government pleader opined on April 16, 1992 that it was a fit case for filing the appeal.
