The respondents then filed an application for revision, which was allowed by the impugned judgment of the High Court dated September 26, 1968.
It belongs to the respondent and has been used by them as a hotel.
He held that, in view of the number obstante clause in Section 138 b of the Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956, hereinafter referred to as the Act, there was numberjustification for the argument that the rental value of the premises companyld number be fixed at a rate higher than the standard rent under Section 7 of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961.
The annual gross rental value of the building was determined at Rs.
The respondents filed objections to the valuation, but the Municipal Commissioner fixed the annual value at Rs.
It was revised by the Assessment Officer on June 3, 1965 and was raised to Rs.
This is how the present appeal has arisen at the instance of the Municipal Corporation and its officers.
6600/ in 1956.
43,405.20.
An appeal was taken to the Second Additional District Judge, but without success.
43,405.20.
The building in question is known as Viram Lodge, on Ravindra Nath Tagore Marg, Indore.
N. Shinghal, J. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court dated September 26, 1968 setting aside the appellate order or the Second Additional District Judge, Indore, dated October 29, 1966 and remitting the matter to the Municipal Commissioner for a fresh determination of the annual value of the building.
