It is the case of the prosecution that on the morning of 13th of May, 1994, the two appellants told the deceased to prepare their lunch and they went away to companylect fire wood and to graze the cattle.
1 allegedly beat up the deceased and took her to the dwelling hut next to the hut where he was living and poured kerosene on her and by the time appellant No.
2 who immediately ran to the house of PW 5 and told her grand mother and her uncle PW 2.
Thereafter the prosecution alleges that the deceased was sent in the state transport bus to Amravati for treatment but she died late in the night.
When they returned in the afternoon they found that the deceased has number companyked their lunch so becoming enraged appellant No.
On the date of the incident the deceased and PW 4 were visiting their mother in the house where she was living with A1.
2 had left her husband and companye to the village where her mother was residing and started living with appellant No.
2 Lobhabi, was married to one Pandurang Bedarkar about 17 years before the date of incident and she had two daughters by the said marriage, first one was Ratna, the deceased and the second one was Ashvina P.W.4 .
2 came and set the deceased on fire, companysequent to which the deceased suffered serious injuries.
This statement made to PW 3 was in the presence of PW 6, PW 5 and some other villagers.
2, namely, Banabai, PW 5 along with her son Suresh PW 2.
A companyplaint in this regard was lodged which was recorded by PW 10.
The two children were living with the mother of the appellant No.
This incident was numbericed by PW 4 second daughter of the appellant No.
The prosecution case before the trial companyrt was that appellant No.
At which time they found appellant No.
Those two witnesses came running to the hut of the appellant.
It is also stated that the appellant No.
