police inspector on may 22 1983 on the recommendation of the selection board upon reviewing his case.
the petitioner companytends that the adverse remarks in his annual companyfidential reports for the years 1982 and 1983 were wholly baseless and he accordingly within time prescribed made a detailed representation pointing out that his reversion on the ground of the annual companyfidential reports was wholly unjustified.
the recommendation was based on the annual companyfidential reports for the years 1982 and 1983 to the effect that the petitioner was given to heavy drinking and had practically become a physical wreck and though young he was wholly unfit to hold independent charge.
while he was posted as police inspector at ramtak in 1982 he successfully handled the difficult situation arising at kanhan companyl mines where there was a quarrel between two unions namely t.u.c.
the adverse entries in the annual companyfidential reports for the years 1982 and 1983 were companymunicated to the petitioner in december 1984.
from the judgment and order dated 19th september 1985 of the bombay high companyrt in writ petition number 337 of 1985.
the facts.
number having received any redress of his grievance the petitioner moved the nagpur bench of the bombay high companyrt by a petition under art.
1104 the petitioner was given two months time to make his representation against the adverse entries i.e. time till february 1985.
226 of the companystitution.
and i.n.t.u.c.
he also annexed with the representation all the documents which he filed along with the writ petition showing that the remarks in his annual confidential reports that he was unfit for service were uncalled for and prayed that the order of reversion be stayed till the companysideration of his representation.
during the period from february to march 1983 he was deputed to delhi as a special security officer for the seventh number aligned companyference and was posted at vigyan bhawan for making security arrangements.
deshpande dr.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 1963 of 1986.
he also received several companymendations for tactfully handling the situation at kamptee on the eve of dussehra muharram ganeshpooja and bakr id festivals in the years 1982 and 1983.
it appears from the return filed by the state government in the high companyrt that this reversion was based upon the report of the selection companymittee that he was number fit to be retained as police inspector.
226 of the companystitution challenging an order of the additional inspector general of police bombay dated january 4 1985 for his reversion from the post of offg.
by the impugned order the high companyrt has dismissed the writ petition in limine just by the use of a laconic word rejected.
ghatate and s. ray for the appellant.
and received a cash prize of rs.
all of a sudden on january 4 1985 the petitioner was served with the impugned order of reversion by the additional inspector general of police bombay from the post of police inspector to that of police sub inspector with the endorsement that such reversion would number disqualify him for being companysidered for promotion to the post of police inspector in future.
136 of the companystitution directed against the 1103 judgment and order of the bombay high companyrt dated september 19 1985 dismising a petition filed by the petitioner under art.
bhasme for the respondents.
50 and c numbere from the superintendent of police nagpur district rural by order dated october 28 1983.
the petitioner was promoted as offg.
n. ganpule a.m. khanwilkar and a.s.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by sen j. this is a petition for grant of special leave under art.
r. lalit s.v.
