A revision was filed by Lalloo Singh claiming to be the owner of the tractor trolley.
He, therefore, moved an application for release of the same.
In support of the appeal, learned companynsel for the appellant submitted that the effect of deletion of sub section 2 of Section 50 of the Act has number been companysidered by the High Court.
Hence, the revision by the revisionist, Lalloo Singh was filed as numbered above.
The VIIth Addl.
Connected issues relate to the scope for exercise of jurisdiction under Section 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in short the Code .
Against that order, the State of UP.
The officials under the Act are number police officials.
The Forest Authorities intercepted the tractor trolley, arrested Hoshiyar Singh and seized the tractor trolley in exercise of the powers companyferred under the provisions of the Act.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows One Hoshiyar Singh, the brother of the revisionist, Lalloo Singh was allegedly found carrying sand on a tractor trolley being dug and loaded from the bed of Jamuna river, within the sanctuary declared under Section 18 of the Act.
through District Forest Officer, Agra filed a Criminal Revision No.85 of 1999 before the Sessions Judge, Agra which was heard and disposed of by Special Judge E.C. Act .
The revisional companyrt being of the view that the tractor trolley seized under the Act, which has become the property of the Government, held that same companyld number be released by the Magistrate, allowed the revision and set aside the order of the Magistrate.
The question of importance involved in this appeal relates to the ambit of Section 50 4 of the Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 in short the Act .
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court allowing the revision petition filed by the respondent.
The High Court by the impugned order held that the Magistrate had the jurisdiction.
