1999 Supp 2 SCR 465 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by T. NANAVATI, J. Leave granted.
56,36,200 on 24.3.83 and 2.7.84 respectively.
Feeling aggrieved by those orders the respondents filed two revisions applications 669 of 1995 and 670 of 1995 before the Rajasthan High Court.
The Court by two separate orders allowed the applications and directed transfer of those suits to the Debt Recovery Tribunal at Jaipur but retained the companynter claim filed by the respondents in Civil Suit No.
152 of 1988.
After Debt Recovery Tribunal was companystituted under the Act at Jaipur, the appellants made two applications on 20.9.94 to the Court for getting the two suits transferred to the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
75,46,921 and Rs.
It was replaced by the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 for short referred to as the Act .
During the pendency of the suits, Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Ordinance, 1993 was promulgated by the President of India on 24.6.1993.
Heard learned companynsel for the parties.
The appellant bank filed two civil suits one against Ballabh Das Sons and its partners and the other against Ballabh Das Co. and its partners in the Court of District Judge at Jaipur for recovery of its dues of Rs.
