Alternatively, she also relied on Section 4A introduced in Andhra Pradesh Land Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1973 by the Andhra Pradesh Amendment Act 10 of 1977 w.e.f.
1.1.1975 claiming that she was in the position of a major son and was entitled to the share of a major son.
2000 Supp 4 SCR 15 The following Order of the Court was delivered JAGANNADHA RAO, J. The Special Leave Petition C No.
It was stated in that order that reasons would follow later.
These two companytentions were rejected by the Land Reforms Tribunal on 20.5.1988, and on appeal by the Appellate Tribunal in LRA/88 on 23.3.1994.
That excess land would vest in the State free of encumbrances under Section 11.
1 of 1973 .
The 2nd respondent filed a declaration on 11.4.1975 L.C.C. 2516, 2517/KDK/75 .
The Andhra Pradesh Land Ceiling Act Act 1 of 1973 Act was published in Andhra Pradesh Gazette on 1.1.1973.
This special leave petition was preferred against the said order.
The Civil Revision Petition 1957/1994 filed by her was dismissed on 28.6.2000 by the High Court.
It was companytended that to that extent, the father would be entitled to an extra unit and need number have to surrender any excess land.
It was companytended that her fathers holding would therefore get diminished and he need number have to surrender excess land.
The petitioner was minor as on 1.1.1975 and she was included in the family unit of her father, the declarant.
The following is the reasoned order.
The 2nd respondent had filed a declaration under the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1973 Act No.
The numberified date under the Act with respect to which the ceiling of a declarant for his family unit had to be determined was 1.1.1975.
The petitioner is the daughter of the 2nd respondent.
15354/ 2000 was dismissed at the stage of admission by an order dated 29.9.2000 after hearing learned Senior companynsel for the petitioner.
At that stage, the petitioner filed an application before the Land Reforms Tribunal in 1987 in the land ceiling proceedings pertaining to her father claiming that by virtue of Section 29A as introduced by the A.P. Amendment Act 13/86 to the Hindu Succession Act Act 30/56 as inserted w.e.f 5.9.1985, the petitioner had become a companyarcener being unmarried on that date she got married on 26.8.1986 , and therefore had equal rights as a son.
