850 and Rs.
The Labour Court recorded a finding that although the workman was engaged as a spray man, he was actually doing the work of duplicating the designs and also as a tracer in addition to his work as spray man.
Leave granted.
6 as additional pay.
This award was challenged by the appellant mills before the High Court in a writ petition.
If number, what benefit relief is the workman entitled and with what other details?
A. No of 1993 SLP C No.
740 per month whereas the designer in the section in which the workman was engaged was getting Rs.
620 per month depending upon the departments to which they were attached.
620 per month as the basic wage.
915 of 1987 This special leave petition filed by the workman was directed to be heard along with the above appeal.
The Court further found that the salary of a designer in the other departments of the appellant mills was Rs.
500 per month by its award of April 9, 1981.
Since the workman was number a designer but only a duplicator of designs and was also a tracer and a sprayman, the Labour Court fixed the basic wage of the workman at Rs.
740/ per month whereas that of the tracer was Rs.
Heard both companynsel.
B. Sawant, J. In this case, the respondent workman had raised an industrial dispute claiming the wages of Designer Sprayman although he was initially engaged by the appellant mills as a Spray man.
The reference made by the State Government read as follows Whether the action of the employer in denying the wages of designer sprayman to Shri Gayas Ahmed Khan, s o. Shri Abdul Razak Khan working in shift general, Engraving Department is legal and justified?
