The writ petition has been dismissed.
in the meanwhile, respondents 1 and 2 are restrained from issuing any declaration under S. 6 The above interim order was made absolute on 4.5.1981, when the writ petition was admitted.
The land in Khirkee Village admeasures 1011 bighas of which the appellant is in possession of 25 bighas.
Governor CW 1251/81 also the petitioner challenged the validity of the S.4 numberification dated 25.11.80.
The above position was companytested by the Union of India which urged that the stay order had been granted qua numberification under S.4 and was number in respect of particular land.
In Laguna Farms p Ltd. v. Lt.
Except the last, other were disposed of on 15.11.83 with CW 426/81.
Thus this appeal by special leave.
An interim order was made in C.M. 250/82 on the same date staying further proceedings in pursuance of the impugned numberification dated 25.11.80.
Governor CW 2450/81 .
Governor CW 1250/81 .
Challenging the declaration, several writ petitions came to be filed in the High Court.
Governor CW 2135/82 .
This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi passed on 2.3.1987 in C.W. No.
The writ petition was admitted on 26.5.81 when an interim order in the following terms was also made in CM 1717/81.
Declaration under Section 6 was published on June 7, 1985.
Governor CW 175/82 the writ petition was admitted on 21.182.
An order similar in terms to that set out above was made on 11.2.82 in CM4514/81 in Ansal Housing Estates Pvt.
But this list is number exhaustive and it appears, there are other writ petitions pending in this companyrt today in which the stay order passed companytinues to be in force e.g. CW 861/82 .
Similar to the appellants, several persons approached the High Court.
Governor CW 426 of 1981 wherein the validity of the numberification dated 25.11.1980 was challenged by certain residents of village Satbari, the following interim order was passed in CM 668/81 on 18.3.1981.
In that case, the Court had granted an interim order on 23.4.82 restraining the respondents from taking further proceedings in companysequence of the impugned numberification and this was apparently, later made absolute till disposal of the writ petition.
of which have been mentioned in the writ petition.
The Full Bench in Balak Ram Gupta Union of India, C.W.P. No.1639/85 decided on May 27,1987 upheld the validity of the numberification under Section 4 1 and declaration under Section 6 on the ground that some of the land owners whose land was companyered under the companymon numberification under Section 4 1 had already approached the High Court and obtained stay of further proceedings including publication of declaration under Section 6.
Notice for 29.7.1981.
Governor CW 2468/81 , Daryao Singh Lt.
This writ petition was dismissed on 15.11.1983 see ILR 2130 .
Leave granted.
Heard companynsel for the parties.
Governor CW 2451/81 , Vijay Narain v. Lt.
Notification under Section 4 1 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for short the Act was published on November 5,1980 acquiring a large extent of land admeasuring 50,000 bighas situated in several villages including Khirkee village.
Case for 27.4.1981.
These writ petitions were also disposed of on 15.11.83.
Stay order passed on 18.31981 made absolute till further orders with liberty to the appropriate authorities of the respondents to take action according to law if the existing companyditions and requirement of the Master Plan and Zonal Plan, if any, are breached or violated by the petitioners.
This order was made absolute on 4.3.82 with liberty to the respondents to move this Court for variation of the order, if so advised, This C.W. was also disposed of on 15.11.83 along with W. 426/81 though the list of cases given at the top of the judgment in C.W 175/81, apparently by oversight .
Governor , though that was a writ petition which challenged the validity of a S.4 numberification dated 31.12.1981.
The Petitioner thereafter moved M.315/84 on 24.1.1984 alleging that the respondents are misinterpreting the aforesaid stay order and are saying that the aforesaid stay order is in respect of the entire village of Rithala and praying, therefore, that as the petitioners had prayed for stay only in respect of their lands, the companyrt should be please to clarify the order dated 23.4.1982 to the effect that the stay is only in respect of the petitioners land, Khasra Nos.
Governor , a writ petition filed by some of the residents of the village of Tughlakabad following similar orders in Om Prakash v. Lt.
This order was made absolute on 29.7.1981 and this C. W along with a number of other C.Ws.,
When the present writ petition had companye up for hearing, the Division Bench of the High Court passed an order stating that the companytroversy raised was companyered by the judgment of the full Bench and numberother point has been raised or argued before the Division Bench.
limited Lt.
2657/85.
Reference has also been made on behalf of the petitioners to certain orders in CW 1203/82 Budh Vihar Welfare Society v. Lt.
After hearing both parties, the companyrt passed following order on 24.2.1984.
The operation of the numberification dated 5.11.1980 was stayed in similar terms by orders dated 30.9.81 and 11.2.82 in CM 4226/81 in CW 2263/81 Bishamber Dayal v. Lt.
was disposed of 15.11.83 along with C.W 426/81.
