On the said date the appellant appeared before the Selection Committee without any kind of protest and simultaneously filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Vice Chancellor dated 5.8.96 whereby the Vice Chancellor disapproved the recommendation of the Selection Committee and issued a direction for a fresh advertisement.
There is a government aided institution known as Hindu Girls College, in the town of Jagadhari, Haryana.
This was number approved by the Vice Chancellor who, by order dated 5.8.96, directed the said post to be re advertised.
The appellant did number challenge the order of the Vice Chancellor declining to accord approval to her selection and, on tile companytrary, she allied afresh to the said post in response to re advertisement of the post without any kind of protest.
On 10.1.97, an interim order was passed in the writ petition filed by the appellant to the effect that the selection process may go on, but the result of the same be number declared.
The writ petitions filed by Suneeta Aggarwal appellant and Mrs. Kamlesh Kumari Bhatia were heard together.
Accordingly, on 13th November 1996, the post was again advertised and in response thereto, the appellant again applied for being companysidered for the post of Hindi Lecturer.
The Selection Committee on 15th July 1996 interviewed the candidates.
2 whereas, one Kiran Bala was placed at Sr.
Not only did she apply for the post, but also she appeared before the Selection Committee companystituted companysequent upon re advertisement of the post and that too without any kind of protest, and on the same day she filed a writ petition against the order of the Vice Chancellor declining to accord his approval and obtained an ad interim order.
The date of interview was fixed as I0th January, 1997.
The numberinee of the Vice Chancellor and the Director of High Education approved the name of the appellant to be placed at Sr.
The management of the institution advertised a post of Hindi Lecturer.
Consequent upon the said order of approval, Mrs. Kamlesh Kumari Bhatia joined the said post.
The Vice Chancellor, being ignorant of the said order, approved the name of Mrs. Kamlesh Kumari Bhatia whose name was recommended by the subsequent Sclectioin Committee for appointment to the post of Hindi Lecturer.
However, this interim order was number brought to the numberice of the Vice Chancellor.
Leave granted.
Mrs. Kamlesh Kumari Bhatia challenged the said withdrawal order passed by the Vice Chancellor by means of a separate writ petition.
However, the Selection Committee recommended the name of the appellant for the said post.
Subsequently, when the interim order was brought to the numberice of the Vice Chancellor, he withdrew the order of approval.
In the writ petition she also did number disclose that she has applied for die post companysequent upon second advertisement.
In response to the said advertisement, the appellant and other persons applied for selection to the said post.
The writ petition tiled by the appellant was dismissed whereas the writ petition filed by Mrs. Kamlesh Kumari Bhatia was allowed.
