Plea of the appellant in this behalf was that the said order of termination was without holding the inquiry and numberreason was given to dispense with the said inquiry as well and, therefore, was in violation of ICID Employees Conduct Rules, 1967, particularly Rule 33 b thereof, which mandates reason to be given for dispensing with the inquiry.
K. SIKRI, J. Leave granted.
By the impugned judgment dated April 25, 2011 passed by the High Court of Delhi in LPA No.
The appellant even filed review petition seeking review of the judgment dated April 25, 2011, which met the same fate as the said review petition was dismissed by the High Court by orders dated August 05, 2011.
