It is the prosecution case that when PW 1, the deceased and PW 3, who joined them on the way reached the Bhimvarappadu junction, the appellant and A 2 came on two cycles from behind and companyght hold of the deceased.
At about 11 a.m. on January 17, 1992, they reached Bhimavarppadu village and went into a Hotel at Junction.
The proceeded towards the companyfee hotel at the Junction.
This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and order dated 18.10.1995 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Criminal Appeal No.
Sharp edge weapon.
A 1 along with the deceased, also used to companymit the offences.
It is the prosecution case that all of them are Yerukala by caste.
Clotted blood present.
PW 9 is the widow of the deceased.
110 of 1991, for an offence under Section 395, was in progress, PW 16, the sub Inspector of Police had sent for PW 1 through the deceased and two companystable.
It is the further case of the prosecution that A 1 came near the deceased put a towel around the neck of the deceased and pulled him.
The appellant accused, according to the prosecution, is the uncle of accused No.2.
They were residents of Velleturu Village of Krishna District of Andhra Pradesh.
PW 1 is the native of Veeramallu village in Khammam District.
While the investigation 247 in Crime No.
Internal Injuries On opening the skin over the chest wall 7th and 8th ribs companypletely cut and 6th rib partially found cut just lateral to left margin of sternum companyresponding to external injury of 1 1/2 through and through present over the right verticle.
Pericardium is found torn.
Leave granted.
The deceased informed PW 1 1 the told him that he companyld number walk because he was having pain in the legs.
While P Ws, 6 and 10 stayed back, the deceased went to the house of PW 1.
32/95.
The deceased and PW 6 used to companymit thefts and they were ex convicts.
One V. Nageswara Rao alias Naguru, hereinafter called the deceased , was a resident of Sattupalli in Khammam District.
