The background facts as projected by the appellant are as follows The respondent was appointed on purely temporary basis in the year 1980 to meet the urgent needs during the Khumbh Festival.
Consequently the Labour Court directed that respondent should be reinstated with companytinuity of service and be paid back wages and other benefits.
There was numberspecific finding recorded by the Labour Court in this regard.
The respondent was engaged from time to time to meet the need for specific time bound work.
Baburam, S o Nathhu Singh, Chawkidar by his employers w.e.f.
On 28 12 1990 they initiated the proceedings under the Industrial Disputes Act followed by companyciliation proceedings and then the dispute was referred to the Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court.
By order dated 29.8.1998 the Deputy Labour Commissioner referred following dispute for adjudication under U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in short the Act Whether termination of service retrenchment of workman Sh.
19.9.1983 was illegal and invalid.
A writ petition was filed before the Allahabad High Court.
One of the companytentions of the appellant before the Labour Court was that the reference was based on a belated claim.
By order dated 11.11.2002 the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Allahabad, Rampur held that the termination retrenchment of the respondent w.e.f.
As there was numberfurther need for engaging the respondent and others, their services were terminated by order dated 19.9.1983.
J U D G M E N T ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant.
