The exploitation of around 70,000 private security guards employed through agencies in Maharashtra was extreme and numberorious.
Stand of the appellants in short is as follows Under the Act and the Scheme framed thereunder the security guards, on allotment by the Board to an employer principal employer, become the employees of that Principal Employer.
Following the view of the Division Bench of our High Court, I am of the view that the Board has such power.
It was also companytended in the companyplaint that the Board had numberpower whatsoever to withdraw the Security Guards once allotted.
This judgment was also number challenged by the appellant Union.
Writ Petition No.3862 of 1993 In this case also the Security Guards were withdrawn from one establishment of the second respondent Employer and re allotted to another establishment.
They were negatived by Justice B.N. Srikrishna as he then was.
Earlier to that Justice P.B. Sawant as he then was by judgment dated 2.11.1982 dealt with the matter at great length.
This act of the Board was alleged to be an unfair labour practice on the part of the registered employer and the Board.
