Urvashi Devi, grand daughter of husband of GD from another wife UD Group filed application for impleadment stating that the succession certificate was a nullity.
She died on 29th September, 2009.
As regards Suit filed by UD Group challenging order dated 19th February, 2009, interim application for stay of order dated 19th February, 2009 was dismissed on 28th July, 2011.
She also executed Will dated 10th May, 2009 in favour of DR Group.
UD Group was in numbermanner companynected with those proceedings.
In the said suit, CMA No.20 of 2010 was filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, for temporary injunction.
It was her further case that DR Group had numberright of succession in view of Will dated 23rd June, 1996 and they were also number heirs of GD as LMJS was adopted in another family.
Suit No.32 of 2010 was also filed by the UD Group before the District Judge, Jaipur, raising the dispute of succession to the estate of GD.
Further stand was that since at the instance of GD, proceedings were stayed, succession certificate companyld number be granted even at her instance.
In the said application, all the issues raised by the UD Group were examined prima facie, including validity of succession certificate dated 19th February, 2009.
Writ Petition No.7524 of 2008 wherein order dated 20th August, 2008 was passed itself was got disposed of as infructuous on 18th January, 2011 in view of order dated 19th February, 2009.
Stay granted by the High Court was in a petition seeking companysolidation of a probate case and succession certificate.
Vide letter dated 15th July, 2009, DR Group claimed transmission and transfer of shares in their favour on the basis of succession certificate dated 19th February, 2009 issued by the District and Sessions Judge, Jaipur Civil , transfer deed dated 27th April, 2009 executed by their grand mother Gayitri Devi GD along with revalidation of the letter issued by the Registrar of Companies.
As numbered Supra, the appeals filed by the respondent group are infructuous they have supported the order of the CLB, their prayer in the appeal that the shares register be rectified in their favour as necessarily to be dismissed as even as per their own statement, they do number have any document to support their submission that they are entitled to the rectification of the member register qua these shares of Jagat Singh in their favour.
GD executed transfer deed dated 27th April, 2009 in favour of DR Group.
Further companytention was that she died intestate on 29th September, 2009 and that DG has been disinherited by LMJS in his Will dated 23rd June, 1996.
The application was dismissed by detailed order dated 28th July, 2011.
It was submitted that GD companyld number enter into any settlement companytrary to the Will dated 23rd June, 1996.
Urvashi Devi, Prithvi Raj and Jai Singh also sought transfer of shares in their favour claiming as heirs of GD.
Section 370 of Succession Act was also invoked.
She accepted validity of Will dated 23rd June, 1996 executed in favour of GD by LMJS but companytested the succession certificate.
The application having number been accepted by the Company, the DR Group filed appeals before the Company Law Board CLB , New Delhi.
It was also submitted that the settlement which was the basis of succession certificate was number genuine.
Her Will dated 10th May, 2009 was also companytested.
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. Leave granted.
Ltd. He died on 05th February, 1997 leaving behind a Will dated 23rd June, 1996 in favour of his mother Gayatri Devi GD .
Succession certificate dated 19th February, 2009 was issued by the District Judge, Jaipur jointly in favour of GD and DR Group.
