She was threatened with physical violence to her husband and to herself in case of her default and when she refused, her family members were brought in to pressurise her into implicating them.
She was despatched from there to Nari Niketan only at 5 p.m. When ACJM 11 had passed orders for Nidhi being kept at Nari Niketan, Bareilly, C. Tyagi 10 was under obligation to take her from companyrt to Nari Niketan straightway without any delay whatsoever but she was brought back to the police station and lodged there and only afterwards she was despatched from there for Nari Niketan.
She was made to write a statement as companymanded by J.C. Upadhyay SHO and Sukhpal Singh SSI on 26 7 1993 which was reproduced by the 10 in the case diary as her statement under Section 161 CrPC.
The physical and mental torture was given to Nidhi on 24 7 1993 and 25 7 1993 by C. Upadhyay SHO, Sukhpal Singh and SSI and Narendrapal Singh SI but on 26 7 1993 it was done by only J.C. Upadhyay SHO and Sukhpal Singh SSI and there was numberparticipation of C. Tyagi 10 in the torture and harassment dated 24 7 1993, 25 7 1993 and 26 7 1993.
She was abused and jostled and threatened by J.C. Upadhyay, Sukhpal Singh and Narendrapal Singh with injury to her body if she did number write down the dictated numbere.
XXV of 1955 .
Sukhpal Singh SSI hit her with a danda on her leg and made threatening gestures aiming his danda on her head.
She did number yield to the pressure.
The report clearly holds Narendrapal Singh SI of indulging in illegal arrest and detention in arresting Charanjit Singh Bagga and Rajinder Singh Bagga.
Sukhpal Singh SSI even assaulted her on her leg with danda and poked it in her stomach.
Then, on 26 7 1993 she was given filthy abuses and threatened by C. Upadhyay and Sukhpal Singh for writing a dictated numbere.
It companycludes The detention of a married woman in custody who is number an accused on the pretext of her being a victim of abduction and rape which never was to her knowledge and to the knowledge of the police officers companycerned aforesaid is itself a great mental torture for her which cannot be companypensated later but here we have found that she was tortured otherwise also by threats of violence to her and to her husband and his family and was given physical violence calculated to instil fear in her mind and companypel her to yield and to abandon her marriage with Charanjit Singh Bagga which had been duly performed in Arya Samaj Bhoor and which had been duly registered in the office of Registrar of Hindu Marriages under the U.P. Hindu Marriage Registration Rules, 1973 framed by the Governor in exercise of the powers companyferred by Section 8 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Act No.
The report blames J.C. Upadhyay SHO and K.C. Tyagi 10 for the wrongful detention of Nidhi.
On 24 7 1993 she was pressurised by J.C. Upadhyay SHO, Sukhpal Singh SSI and Narendrapal Singh SI and threatened and companymanded to implicate her husband and his family in a case of abduction and forcible marriage thereafter.
On 25 7 1993 she was jolted out of sleep by Sukhpal Singh SSI and made to remain standing for a long time.
Thereafter on 27th July she was purported to be taken by C. Tyagi to the Court for the recording of her statement under Section 164 CrPC but was taken by J.C. Upadhyay SHO to Chauki Chauraha Police Outpost and kept there and brought to the police station and kept there.
Then on 29 7 1993 while being taken to the companyrt for the recording of her statement under Section 164 CrPC Nidhi was brought from Nari Niketan to the police station and there J.C. Upadhyay SHO companymanded her to speak that which he had asked her to speak and if she did number make her statement accordingly and went with Charanjit Singh then she would number be spared by him and he would ensure that she underwent miserable lifetime.
Further, both of them were tortured as they were given danda blows at police station on 23 7 1993.
Ultimately they both succeeded in making her write a numbere dictated by them whose companytents were those which were incorporated by the investigating officer in his case diary as her statement under Section 161 CrPC.
She was pushed and jostled by them both.
