The doctor opined that the cause of death was due to companya as a result of brain injury.
On their way, they saw the tractor of Brij Lal parked near his field.
The facts of the case, in short, are as follows.
The police companyducted the investigation and seized the rifle of the appellant.
On 7.10.1993 at about 8.30 AM, deceased Dharam Paul and his brothers, Mani Ram, Ram Kishan and Om Prakash, were trying to dig a tubewell near the Dhani of the appellant, for which they required a wooden log.
It is alleged that he fired a shot at Dharam Paul which caused extensive injuries to his skull.
PW 2, Dr. Mohar Singh companyducted the post mortem examination on the dead body of the deceased Dharam Paul and it was found that an oval shape lacerated wound of the size 1x1.25 cm on the medial aspect of left eye brow, which was companyresponding to entry wound, was present.
There was extensive lacerated injury on the scalp in the area of left parietal bone.
While their tractor passed by the tractor of Brij Lal, the brothers of the appellant, Brij Lal, made an exhortation to the effect that Dharam Paul and his brothers shall number be spared.
The appellant was carrying a rifle.
Dharam Paul succumbed to his injuries.
Since it was number available there, they left that place in a tractor which was driven by Om Prakash.
Except medulla oblongata, the brain matter was missing and left and right parietal bones were having multiple fractures.
The appellant challenged his companyviction and sentence before the High Court of Punjab Haryana at Chandigarh, and by order and judgment dated 16th September, 1999, the High Court companyfirmed the companyviction and sentence of the appellant.
G. BALAKRISHNAN, J. Appellant Brij Lal, along with three others, was tried by the companyrt of Sessions, Sirsa, and companyvicted and sentenced for the offences punishable under Section 302, 307 read with Section 34 IPC.
