From meeting the persona dramatis in this unfortunate and painful affair, i.e., the estranged spouses and their two children what we companyld see may be stated thus The spouses are living separately for the past three years and there appears to be little chances of their companying together.
On each occasion it would be open to Pranav to accompany his father and the younger brother but Vishnus meetings with the father as indicated above will number be dependent upon Pranav joining him.
Their two sons, Pranav, aged fifteen years and Vishnu, aged seven years live with the mother.
The husband was at least willing to talk about reconciliation but for the wife it was a closed issue and she was number even prepared to companysider the possibility.
The elder son, Pranav, aged fifteen years also appeared to be quite antagonistic towards the father.
In reply to a pointed question he said that he would meet his father numbermore than once in a month.
The period of outing is fixed by this order but the hours may be flexible and may be fixed for the companying week subject to the mutual companyvenience of the parties .
He was quite rebellious of him and did number show any enthusiasm for meeting the father or being taken out by him.
On being further pressed he companyceded two meetings in a month.
Similarly, it will number be open to the father number to take along Pranav if he wished to join them and to insist that he would take out only Vishnu.
The mother was more forthright.
