1997 Supp 4 SCR 327 The Judgment was delivered by G.N. RAY, J. N. RAY, J. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions.
It appears that out of the panel for the year 1994 95 there were in all three officers who did number get appointments for want of the said tenure of two years reckoning from the date of accrual of vacancy and all the said officers have since retired.
In the case of Shri Agarwal and Shri Kamal Raj, appointments to the posts of General Managers and equivalent have been made out of empanelled officers who had two years of residual service from the date of accrual of vacancy on the basis of the interpretation of para 7.3 of the said Scheme in companyformity with the decision of the Allahabad Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal.
184 of 1992 and the appeal arising out of SLP No.
It also appears that even on the basis of actual period of service left before superannuation, both of them do number have two years of actual service on the date of appointment because the date of appointment was 31 10 1995 and the date of retirement of Shri Agarwal and Shri Kamal Raj is 31 10 1996 and 31 8 1996 respectively.
If the rule of two years of actual service on the date of appointment had been applied then out of the eleven officers, the appointment of eight officers would have become invalid.
Shri S.A.A. Zaidi, the respondent in the appeal arising out of SLP No.
Both Shri Agarwal and Shri Kamal Raj do number have two years tenure reckoning from the date of accrual of vacancy falling in their turns.
24361 of 1996 is directed against order dated 22 8 1996 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench in OA No.
The appeal arising out of SLP No.
E III 84/PM6/136 dated 16 7 1986 which was further amended vide resolutions dated 30 1 1987 and 26 2 1988.
9068 of 1997 is directed against order dated 7 3 1997 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.
Heard learned companynsel for the respective parties The appeal arising out of SLP No.
2122 of 1995.
25014 of 1996 is directed against order dated 29 10 1986 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.
