After dismissal of the third writ petition on 27th April, 1983 the petitioner appears to have sent a representation, on 7th May, 1983, to the first respondent invoking powers under Section 21 of the General Clauses Act read with Section 11 of the COFEPOSA.
After he had suffered detention for a period of about 10 months, he was directed to be released on parole by this Court on 27th September, 1983.
That writ petition was also dismissed by this Court on 27th April, 1983.
The Special Leave Petition as well as the Writ Petition stood dismissed by a three Judge Bench of this Court on 23rd February, 1983.
6/1983, which was dismissed by the Delhi High Court on 1st February, 1983.
182/1983, was also filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, once again putting in issue the same order of detention which had been upheld by the Delhi High Court.
It is found that representations had been made by the petitioner against the order of detention which were companysidered by the detaining authority and the Advisory Board.
This fourth writ petition has been filed thereafter challenging the same order of detention, the validity of which had been upheld earlier as numbericed above.
On 23rd May, 1983, the representation of the petitioner was rejected by the Delhi Administration after due companysideration.
The order of detention and the order of rejection or the representations was challenged through writ petition No.
The order of the Delhi High Court was challenged through Special Leave Petition No.
The petitioner was detained, as already numbericed, by an order made on 15th December, 1982.
The petitioner thereafter filed yet another writ petition being Writ Petition Crl.
More than 16 years have number gone by.
379/1983, another writ petition, being Writ Petition Crl.
363/1983 challenging the order of detention on some additional grounds.
Together with the Special Leave Petition No.
The representations were rejected.
The petitioner also requested for the companystitution of a fresh Advisory Board to companysider his representation.
379/1983 in this Court.
