However, according to the Tribunal such a misconduct would number attract Rule 3 1 i and iii of the Rules as the companycerned employee even though engaged as a casual employee companyld number be said to be governed by the Rules at the time when he obtained such employment and that he was number guilty of any misconduct companymitted during the Railway service.
W I T H CIVIL APPEAL NO.
9637 OF 1995 Arising out of S.L.P. C No.
The aforesaid view of the Tribunal is brought on the anvil of scrutiny in the present proceedings moved by the appellant Union of India and the companycerned Railway authorities under whom the respondent workmen worked at the relevant time.
