The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tehri Garhwal in Criminal Case No.
Appeal filed against the same was also dismissed by the Sessions Court and the High Court by judgment and order dated 23.3.2012 has dismissed the Revision filed by the aforesaid Surat Singh and affirmed the order of companyviction passed by the trial Court.
The appellant questions the companyrectness or otherwise of the impugned judgment and order in this appeal.
Aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the appellant had unsuccessfully appealed before the learned Sessions Judge, Tehri Garhwal, in Criminal Appeal No.
This appeal, by special leave, is filed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature of Uttarakhand at Nanital in Criminal Revision No.
161 of 2004, dated 23.03.2012.
The companytents and terms of the said companypromise are reproduced hereinbelow I, Km.
The accused person, revisionist therein, is before us in this appeal.
The appellant, against the aforesaid order and judgment, preferred Revision Petition No.
161 of 2004 before the High Court, wherein the High Court, vide the impugned judgment and order dated 23.03.2012, has dismissed it.
921 of 2002, vide judgment and order dated 07.04.2003, has companyvicted the appellant under Sections 354 and 506 of the IPC and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment of one year with fine and rigorous imprisonment of six months, respectively.
5 of 2003.
Tihri Garhwal, lodged against Surat Singh, S o. Kamand Singh, R o. Village Rampur, Patti Kunjani, Tehsil Narendra Nagar, District Tehri Garhwal, Uttarakhand.
In the instant case, Respondent number 2, Km.
The said appeal was rejected and the judgment and order passed by the learned Magistrate was upheld, vide judgment and order dated 14.09.2003.
After due investigation, charge sheet was filed against the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 323, 354 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 the IPC for short .
Purni Devi, daughter of Shri Dhir Singh, R o. Village Rampur Patti Kunjani, P.S. Chamba, District Tihri Garhwal, presently at New Delhi, do hereby solemnly affirms under oath as following That I am the informant in FIR No.31/98, dated 29.10.98 U s.354, 323, 506 IPC P.S.Chamba, Distt.
Leave granted.
During the pendency of this appeal, we are informed by the learned companynsel appearing for the parties that the parties, namely, the appellant accused and respondent number 2 have entered into a companypromise and, accordingly, respondent number 2 has filed an affidavit before this Court.
Purni Devi had filed an F.I.R. against the appellant for outraging her modesty.
That on the basis of aforesaid FIR dated 29.10.98 lodged by me against the aforesaid Surat Singh, S o.Kamand Singh, who is my neighbour was put in trial and was companyvicted by Chief Judicial Magistrate Tihri Garhwal, New Tihri for the offences U ss.354, 506 IPC and was awarded maximum sentence of 1 year R.I., Rs.1000/ fine by judgment and order dated 7.4.2003 passed in Criminal Case No.921/02.
