On that day Sudhir sent the chalan to PW 2 for his signature through PW 3.
PW 2 initialled it and after informing PW 1 about his having initiated the chalan went down to verify the stock.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated July 15, 1969 of the Calcutta High Court in Criminal Appeals Nos.
He therefore asked PW 2 to make a physical verification of the, lime stone to be received on 4 3 1968.
The chalan, Ext.
423 and 390 of 1960 respectively.
Thereupon Sudhir would put a seal on it as also his signature, and Shaw would present that chalan to the companycerned department and receive payment for the supply made.
60 61 of 1970.
As the four bags of lime stone were number there he asked Sudhir and he stated that the quantity received had been spent.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeals Nos.
it appears that four bags of lime stone were needed every day.
The facts giving rise to these appeals are as follows Appellant Sudhir Kumar Mukherjee was an employee in charge of soda lime department of M s Gluconate Limited, Calcutta, and appellant Sham Lal Shaw was the supplier of lime stone to the said firm.
K. Chatterjee and G. S. Chatterjee, for the respondent in both the appeals .
L. Kohli and S. K. Gambhir, for the appellant in both the appeals .
200 on each of the accused on the, first charge and companysidered that numberseparate sentence was necessary in respect of the second, and the appeals filed by them in the High Court of Calcutta were summarily dismissed.
Thereupon Sudhir would send the chalan to P.W. 2, Ardendu Sekhar Goswami, who used to initial it and send back to Sudhir.
The procedure in respect of the supply was that Shaw used to bring the bags to Sudhir and present a chalan to him.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ALAGIRISWAMI, J. The two appellants were tried before the Presidency Magistrate, 4th Court, Calcutta for offences under s.120B read with s.420 and s.511 read with s.420 of the Indian Penal Code.
