It was also submitted that in case such an application is filed, the same companyld be directed to be companysidered in the light of judgment of this Court in Jasbir Singh Bakshi versus Union Territory, Chandigarh and others, reported in 2004 10 SCC In terms of the request thus made, the writ petition was disposed of by the impugned order.
The first prayer made by the writ petitioners before the High Court was to issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned orders Annexures P/2, P/3, P/5, P/6, P/8, P/8A, P/9, P/11 and P/13 as well as quashing the entire proceedings initiated and undertaken by the respondents for cancellation of the premises i.e. plot bearing No.192, Sector 40, Chandigarh especially in view of the fact that petitioners were ready to make the entire payment due till date.
20326 of 2004 are before this Court, aggrieved by the judgment dated 21.4.2006.
Thus aggrieved, the Union Territory, Chandigarh is before this Court in civil appeal.
The writ petitioners had approached the High Court, aggrieved by the various orders passed with regard to cancellation of a plot allotted to one Milkhi Ram, S o Madho Ram.
Respondent Nos.
1 to 3 in Civil Writ Petition No.
KURIAN, J. We have heard learned companynsel for the parties.
