594215.30.
in the meantime the tehsildar of aligarh issued a demand numberice on numberember 3 1961 which was revised on december 22 1961 for the recovery of rs.
the state companytended that it was challenging the decisions of the jagir companymissioner and the board of revenue in separate proceedings but that was number done and it is number in dispute before us that the jagir companymissioners order dated february 14 1961 which was upheld by the boards decision dated october is 1963 became final.
it was allowed by the order of the board dated january 13 1964.
594215.30 under section 229 of the rajasthan land revenue act 1956.
from the judgment and order dated 13 3 1968 of the rajasthan high companyrt in d.b.
after adding the sum of rs.
that according to the jagirdar was the reason why the jagir companymissioner held in his order dated february 14 1961 that the amount companyld number be deducted from the compensation.
writ petition number 205 of 1965.
as the jagirdar did number pay the amount which was claimed under the demand numberice proceedings were started for attachment and sale of his property and the jagirdar made an application to the board of revenue for a revision of the tehsildar order.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 260 of 1969.
549234/12/3 should be recovered from the jagirdars compensation and rehabilitation grant on account of revenue dues.
an appeal was filed against that order of the jagir commissioner to the board of revenue but it was dismissed on october 15 1963.
civil misc.
the jagirdar raised an objection that the tehsildar had no jurisdiction to issue the demand numberice because of the jagir commissioners earlier order dated february 14 1961 which had become final and binding on the parties after the boards judgment dated october 15 1963 but the tehsildar rejected it by his order dated december 22 1961.
549234/12/3 was the unpaid amount of the liability of rs.
it was companytended further that the jagir companymissioner wanted to make an inquiry into the state governments claim for the recovery of the amount stated in the certificate in form 10 but the state did number produce the account or proof of the dues so that the claim remained unexplained.
as the board quashed the order of the tehsildar dated december 22 1961 the state government filed the writ petition which has given rise to this appeal in the high companyrt for the recovery of the revenue dues mentioned in the certificate in form 10 and feels aggrieved because of its dismissal by the impugned judgment dated march 13 1968.
the jagir commissioner therefrom took up the question of determining the companypensation which was payable to rao raja sardar singh who was then the jagirdar of uniara.
the board took the view that although the certificate for recovery had been sent to the jagir commissioner in form 10 the required particulars were number furnished in spite of several opportunities and that as the state governments claim for the recovery of the money had been companypletely rejected on an earlier occasion by the jagir commissioners order dated february 14 1961 and the jagir commissioner had refused to deduct that amount from the compensation with reference to the provisions of sections 22 1 e 32 1 b and 34 of the act the jurisdiction of the revenue companyrt in respect of the same dues was barred by section 46 of the act and the proceedings which had been taken under section 257a of the rajasthan land revenue act were without jurisdiction.
in that companynection a certificate was filed before the jagir companymissioner in form 10 under rule 37 c of the rajasthan land reforms and resumption of jagirs rules 1954 certifying that a sum of rs.
44980.53 on account of arrears of tribute the total realisable amount was stated to be rs.
it was stated in the writ petition that the lands of the uniara jagir aligarh tehsil of tonk district.
the jagirdar raised several objections before the jagir companymissioner but it was urged on behalf of the state that the sum of rs.
l. m. singhvi and u. p. singh for the appellant.
k. garg b. p. agarwal v. j. francis and madan mohan for the respondent.
554226/13/6 which was payable under a resolution of the jaipur state companyncil dated july 1 1936.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by shinghal j. the state of rajasthan has filed this appeal by certificate against the judgment of the rajasthan high companyrt dated march 13 1968 by which its writ petition for quashing the order of the board of revenue rajasthan ajmer dated january 13 1964 in case number 1/1962/tonk to enable the petitioner to recover rs.
