According to respondent number 1, they repossessed the vehicle taken in the presence of his friends who ridiculed him for having lost the motorcycle.
Respondent number1 alleged that her son companymitted suicide as a result of the manner in which the banks recovery agents had repossessed her sons motorcycle.
The bank asked the High Court to clarify or delete paras 1, 3 and 4.
The respondent filed a criminal writ petition number 576 of 2006 with the Delhi High Court.
Vide this writ petition, the respondents sought a writ of mandamus that would direct the Commissioner of Police to take action against the appellant bank.
The appellant bank claimed that it was aggrieved by the observations made by the High Court in paragraphs 1, 3 4 of the impugned order.
In the first information report F.I.R. dated 29.11.2005, the respondent alleged that on 16th October, 2005 at about 1.00 p.m., two recovery agents referred to as goons forcibly entered her sons bedroom and started harassing and humiliating him for the loan payments that were overdue on his two wheeler and on his personal loan.
