The full Bench came to the companyclusion that the case of the respondent had to be upheld and he was related or treated as reinstated, as the case might with companysequential benefits.
In the other matters the full Bench judgment was followed.
Clause 4 thereof reads thus The Government also direct that cases companying up for retirement during the first half year of any year shall be sent up for review before the 1st July of the previous year.
This appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
A.No.4126/85 Learned companynsel for the appellant states that the respondent in this appeal has died and he has instructions to withdraw this appeal.
4159 AND 4158 OF 1996 Arising out of S.L.P. C NOS.
The principal judgment of the High Court was delivered by a full Bench and that is the subject matter of C.A.No.352/85.
This is a batch of appeals arising from judgments and orders of the High Court of Madras.
He was companypulsorily retired from service in the public interest after he had attained the age on the ground that the provisions of the rule and the directions of the State Government applicable to companypulsory retirement had number been followed.
The respondent in each of these appeals was an employee of the appellant, State of Tamil Nadu.
A.Nos.
13848/86 4958 /85 Special leave granted.
