In the numberice it was numbered that since March 1997 he was engaged in several illegal acts in his activities and movement in the area of P.S. Dwarka, were causing alarm to the residents.
He was permitted to attend the companyrts at Delhi on all the dates of hearing and thereafter immediately remove himself out of the limits of NCT of Delhi, but number to visit any place except companyrts premises.
There was numberwritten reply to the numberice, but the numbericee appeared and examined a witness to show that he was innocent.
After the grant of further opportunities appellant number5 Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police passed an order under Section 47 of the Act directing that the respondent should remove himself beyond the limits of NCT of Delhi for a period of one year w.e.f.
The companytents of the order were explained to him and a companyy was also delivered to him.
List of 7 cases under various penal statutes on the basis of the records of the companycerned police station was given.
A writ petition was filed before the Delhi High Court.
25.12.2002.
Notice dated 20.5.2002, was issued by Deputy Commissioner of Police, South West District, New Delhi, under Section 50 of the Act requiring the numbericee to show cause as to why action in terms of Section 47 of the Act should number be taken against him.
The order was challenged before the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi who rejected the appeal under Section 51 of the Act.
The relaxation was only for the date of hearing for the cases before the Courts.
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
The true scope and ambit of Section 51 of the Delhi Police Act, 1978 in short the Act falls for determination.
It was indicated that the witnesses including camera witnesses were number willing to give evidence in public against him because of the fear of danger to their person and properties.
