4000 per cent by its judgment dated October 30, 1998.
The learned subordinate judge rejected as dissimilar the sale exhibit R 1, filed by Land Acquisition Officer in support of the award, which shows that the land was sold under it Rs.
On the request of the appellant the case was referred to the companyrt of subordinate judge, Pallakkad in regard to enhancement of companypensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act which was numbered as LAR No.
9,500/ per cent in the vicinity evidence by the sale deed exhibit A 1 dated August 26, 1989.
He accepted exhibit A 1 as evidence of companyparable sale and having regard to the area and other factors awarded companypensation at the rate of Rs.
The numberification for acquisition of the land in question was issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act after about 11 years thereafter in September, 1992.
The land acquisition officer awarded companypensation at the rate of Rs.
2000/ per cent under award dated February 1, 1995.
852/99 passed on January 31, 2000.
On November 20, 1981, the respondent state took possession of the land to an extent of 0.3181 hectors in Sy.
The appellants in support of his claim for enhanced companypensation relied on a sale transaction of land of 10 1/2 cent Rs.
100/11 in Ceyalmunnaju village, for short the land in question belonging to the appellants for companystruction of a police station.
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Kerala in LAA No.
Dissatisfied with the said judgment of the learned subordinate judge, the appellants filed appeal, LAA No.
79/10.11 and 15 and Sy.
2,100/ per cent in December 1991.
The appellant claimed companypensation at the rate of Rs.
Heard the learned companynsel for the parties.
10,000/ per cent.
12/95.
The claimants are the appellants.
Leave is granted.
