Brief facts which are necessary to dispose of this appeal are recapitulated as under One Nemi Chand number deceased represented through his legal representatives and the respondent in this appeal took a shop from the father of the appellant on a monthly rent of Rs.75/ in the year 1983 and executed a tenancy agreement.
The suit was decreed by the learned Additional Civil Judge Junior Division , Barmer.
The appellant filed a suit for eviction on the ground of bona fide need, default, number user of the premises and companyparative hardship.
The learned Additional District Judge allowed the appeal which was upheld by the High Court.
The appellant submitted that the First Appellate Court and the High Court erred in setting aside a well reasoned judgment delivered by the learned Additional Civil Judge Junior Division Barmer in Civil Suit No.41 of 1993.
The appellant is aggrieved by the impugned judgment of the High Court by which the High Court upheld the judgment of the learned Additional District Judge, Barmer.
The respondent tenant, aggrieved by the said judgment preferred an appeal before the learned Additional District Judge, Barmer.
Leave granted.
