The trial Court found the appellant Baijnath guilty of the offence under Sections 302 and 201, I.P.C. and companyvicted him as afore mentioned which companyviction and sentence were companyfirmed by the High Court.
During the companyrse of the investigation Baijnath was arrested on 2 7 73.
PW 23 opined that the said pellets companyld have been fired from the gun of Baijnath.
The case of prosecution is that on the information given by this Baijnath the deed body was recovered which was in a highly de composed and beyond identification.
100/79 is preferred by one Baijnath who stands companyvicted Under Section 302 I.P.C. and also Under Section 201 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and three years respectively.
The trial Court further companyvicted Kedar Nath under Section 201, I.P.C. and sentenced him.
The appellant Baijnath was a license, owning a gun.
Some cloth pieces were also seized pursuant to the statement given by this Baijnath along with some parts of the cycle.
Thereafter on a tip off, a companystable PW 1 attached to the companycerned Police Station made in entry in the first information report.
His gun was seized and sent for examination to the ballistic expert PW 23 to examine whether the flattered lead pellets recovered from near the dead body companyld have been fired by the gun of Baijnath.
99/79 is preferred by one Kedar Nath who stands companyvicted Under Section 201 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo three years rigorous imprisonment whereas Criminal Appeal No.
A search was also number fruitful.
Appellant, Kedar Nath was arrested on 31 5 73 and in pursuance of his statement, certain cloths, said to have been carried by the deceased were recovered.
Appeal No.
The investigation proceeded on the strength of the report given by PW 24 and on the basis of information of PW 1 who is said to have obtained that information from an undisclosed informant.
Therefore, on 15 5 73 his brother made a companyplaint before the police.
