Thereby, she had acknowledged that she had a life interest in the properties had under the companypromise decree.
Seethramratna Ranganayakamma, the respondent herein.
The Settlement Officer negatived the claim of the appellant and granted patta in favour of Krish namurty, namely, the husband of the respondent.
On her demise on April 7, 1973, the appellant filed an application and patta to the entire extent was granted exclusively in favour of the first appellant.
Similarly, a gift deed was executed in favour of Raghavamma by the first appellant in respect of 1.90 acres of land.
The admitted facts are that one V. Satyanarayana had executed a will dated December 1, 1950 bequeathing 2.66 acres of wet land in favour of his wife Smt.
182/53 in the Sub Court, Tanali for partition of all the properties into equal shares between herself and the appellant.
The properties sold by the appellant to the third party also was affirmed.
84/61 dated December 3, 1962, the appellate authority set aside the order and granted joint patta in favour of appellant No.
4 for enjoyment during her life time and the possession given as per the companypromise decree.
This was also pursuant to the companypromise decree under Ex.
B 3 in favour of the third party alienating 1.50 acres of land had under the companypromise decree.
543 of 1977.
In furtherance thereof, the respondent filed OS No.
94/73 for possession of the properties under the will dated July 6, 1972.
Therein a companypromise was effected and a decree in terms thereof under Ex.
She accepted, acted on and enjoyed for life.
A 11 was companyferred with a limited interest in terms thereof.
A 3 and A 4 that what she obtained under the companypromise decree, Ex.
Equally, the appellant had executed another gift deed to an extent of 1.97 acres bequeathing under Ex.
Thus, this appeal by special leave.
Subsequently, on April 25, 1959, the appellant had executed another gift deed to an extent of 1.50 acres of land in favour of third party jointly with his mother wherein she acknowledged that the property had by Raghavamma under companypromise decree under Ex.
Raghavamma had executed a will in favour of the respondent bequeathing the property obtained under Ex.
Thereunder also, she had acknowledged number only the limited estate had under the companypromise decree but also her limited right under Ex.
On appeal, in TAS No.
After the estate was abolished under the AP AA Estate Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari Act, 1948 for short, the Abolition Act , the claim under Section 15 of the Act was filed.
Thereunder, the husband of the respondent laid the claim for Ryotwari patta.
The balance property was partitioned in equal shares of 6.5 acres with a right of reversion to the appellant on the demise of Raghavamma.
A 4 in favour of his mother to enjoy the property during her life time as limited owner.
On appeal, it was decreed.
A 11 was passed on July 13, 1955.
The trial Court dismissed the suit.
He died on December 2, 1950 leaving behind him his widow Raghavamma, his minor son, the appellant herein and his daughter the respondent.
Therein she has specifically stated that she had a life interest in terms of the companypromise decree, Ex.
1 and his mother Raghavamma.
Raghavamma, the mother of the first respondent and the first appellant had executed a sale deed, Ex.
Therein also she had acknowledged that she had life interest in the companypromise decree under Ex.
Under the companypromise decree, the property bequeathed in favour of the respondent, Ranganayakamma was affirmed.
Subsequently, his widow Raghavamma filed OS No.
But how she has understood her limited right gets reflected in subsequent documents to which she was admittedly a party and dealt with after the Act came into force pursuant to the companypromise decree.
There also a companypromise decree was executed.
Ramaswamy and D.P. Wadhwa, JJ.
This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, made on 20.3.1985 in Appeal No.
Raghavamma and also another gift deed bequeathing lands in favour of his daughter Smt.
