On 17.9.1984 plaint was amended showing Saraswathi Ammal as defendant.
On the date when the ex part decree was passed, Saraswathi Ammal did number have any right to the property.
OS 528 of 1981 against Shahul Hameed for specific performance.
On 7.11.1994 Revision Petition i.e. CRP No.
On 29.7.1989 a second application was filed i.e. I.A. 987 of 1989 to set aside the ex parte decree.
830 of 1983 to implead Saraswathi Ammal was allowed on 16.4.1984.
528 of 1981.
640 of 1988 was filed by Saraswathi Ammal to companydone the delay in seeking to set aside ex parte decree in the suit.
On 30.12.1985 Anna Pushpam Ammal sold the property to the respondent No.1.
On 10.11.1987 Execution Petition was filed to execute the decree in the aforesaid OS No.
On 13.7.1983 an application A. No.
On 11.1.1988, the Executing Court executed sale deed in favour of Arunachalam.
On 8.8.1986 Lalitha Ammal sold the property to respondent No.2.
On 21.7.1989 the said I.A. was dismissed as number pressed.
On 23.3.1988 I.A. No.
By the impugned judgment dated 3.1.2000 second appeal filed by the respondents was allowed.
673 of 1994 was filed by the respondents for declaration of title and injunction.
Initially Saraswathi Ammal was number a party.
On 12.12.1994 the suit O.S. No.
On 28.1.1984 Saraswathi Ammal sold the property to Anna Pushpam Ammal and Lalitha Ammal under two sale deeds.
On 26.5.1978 Shahul Hameed sold the property to one Saraswathi Ammal who was number a party to the proceedings.
It was also held that Exh.
On 20.6.1990, the same was dismissed on merit.
CIVIL APPEAL NO.
830 of 1983 was filed to implead Saraswathi Ammal as defendant.
854 OF 2001 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court in Second Appeal filed by the respondent No.1.
An appeal filed by the appellant AS 23 of 1999 was allowed on 24.9.1999.
On 3.2.1981 aforesaid Arunachalam instituted suit No.
An ex party decree was passed in OS No.
528 of 1981 on 11.7.1985.
On 12.10.1992 Appeal CMA 3 of 1991 filed by Saraswathi Ammal was dismissed.
A. No.
3139 of 1994 was dismissed.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows On 12.2.1978 an agreement for sale was entered into between one Shahul Hameed and Arunchalam father of the appellant .
The same was decreed on 26.4.1996.
