But the attention of the High Court was number drawn to it and the judgment delivered by the High Court, therefore, did number take into account this amending legislation.
before any further proceedings companyld take place pursuant to the Notification, respondent number.
The appellant thereupon preferred the present appeal with special leave obtained from this Court.
The appellant, for whose benefit the acquisition was going to be made, thereupon filed a Review Petition in the High Court.
The High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed the impugned Notification by a Judgment dated 28th June, 1983.
1 and 2 who are owners of the land numberified for acquisition under the Notification filed a writ petition in the High Court for quashing the Notification on the ground that public numberice of the substance of the Notification in the locality was number given on the same day on which the Notification was published in the Official Gazette.
From the Judgment and Order dated 19.3.1984 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in R.W.A.M.P. No.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
Prabhakara Rao for the Appellant.
S. Narayana for the Respondent.
2521 of 1984.
However, in the meantime, before the Judgment was delivered by the High Court, the Land Acquisition Andhra Pradesh Amendment and Validation Act, 1983 had already been enacted on 23rd June, A 1985.
The report of companypliance with this direction was submitted by the Village Officer on 18th December, 1979.
The judgment of the Court was delivered by BHAGWATI, C.J. The Notification under sub section 1 of section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh in the present case on 18th October, 1979 and it was published in the Government Gazette on the same day.
The Revenue Divisional Officer directed public numberice of the substance of the Notification to be given in the locality and this direction was admittedly given on 19th November, 1979.
134 of 1984.
