Before the learned arbitrator, three claims were raised by the respondent, viz.,
5647 5648 OF 1997 B. SINHA, J Which would be the appropriate companyrt for the purpose of filing of an award by the arbitrator is the question involved herein.
3, 7 and 11.
Claim Item No.
Disputes and differences having arisen between the parties, the arbitration agreement was invoked.
The learned arbitrator is requested to companysider the desirability of making his award as expeditiously as possible keeping in view the fact that the matter has been pending for a long time.
An arbitrator was appointed.
90,005/ was made.
3 related to extra items which has been rejected.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case and particularly keeping in view the fact that the matter relates to pure interpretation of document which gives rise to question of law and in stead and in place of remitting the matter to the named arbitrator, we would direct that the disputes in relation to Claim Items 3, 7 and 11 be referred to the Honble Mr Justice D.N. Prasad, a retired Judge of the Jharkhand High Court on such terms and companyditions as may be mutually agreed upon by the parties.
ORDER A. NOS.
Claim Item Nos.
The said question arises in the following circumstances Respondent herein admittedly was a companytractor of the appellant.
1 2 OF 2005 IN CIVIL APPEAL NOs.
