1069/62, 20, 21, 40, 49, 476, 699, 574 of 1963, 1070 to 1075 of 1962, 1086 to 1089 of 1962, 516, 727 and 728 of 1963.
B. Patel and 1.
N. Shroff, for respondent number I in C.A. 2271/68 .
From the Judgment and order dated the 21st July, 1965 of the Gujarat High Court at Ahmedabad in Special Civil Application Nos.
3 to the writ petition requiring the petitioner 1st respondent to pay the unpaid accumulations specified therein.
From the, Judgment and Order dated the 19th/20th/21st day of July 1965 of the Gujrat High Court at Ahmedabad in Special Civil Application Nos.
From the judgment and order dated the 21st July, 1965 of the Gujarat High Court in Special Civil Applications Nos.
N. Shroff, for respondent number I In As.
458 to 473 of 1963.
From the judgment and order dated the 19th/20th/21st day of July 1965, of the Gujarat High Court at Ahmedabad in Special Civil Application No.
1 1 14, 1116,1119 and 1128/69 .
T. Desai, S. K. Dholakia and S. P. Nayar, for the appellants.
In all the appeals .
The decision there will dispose of the other appeals.
C. Bhandare and M. N. Shroff, for intervener.
492 to 512 of 1969.
C. Bhartari, J. B. Dadachanji, O. C. Mathur and Ravinder Narain, respondent number I in C. As.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeals Nos.
1115, 1118, 1125/ 69 .
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MATHEW, J. The facts are similar in all these cases.
Civil Appeal No.
Civil Appeals Nos.
Civil Appeals Nos.
2271 of 1968.
836 of 1962.
579 to 581 of 1963.
The first respondent, a companypany registered under the Companies Act, filed a Writ petition in the High Court of Gujarat.
In that petition it impugned the provisions of sections 3, 6A and 7 of the Bombay Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1953 hereinafter referred to as the Act and s. 13 of the Bombay Labour Welfare Fund Gujarat Extension and Amendment Act, 1961 hereinafter referred to as the First Amendment Act and rules 3 and 4 of the Bombay Labour Welfare Fund Rules, 1953 hereinafter referred to as tie Rules as unconstitutional and prayed for the issue of a writ in the nature of mandamus or other appropriate writ or direction against the respondents in the writ petition to desist from enforcing the direction in the I numberice dated August 2, 1962 of respondent No.
B. Patel, D. N. Misra, J. B. Dadachanji, O. C. Mathur and Ravinder Narain, for respondent number I in C. As.
1114 to 1129 of 1969.
Ram Punjwani, P. C. Bhartari, J. B. Dadachanji, O. C. Mathur and Ravinder Narain, for respondent number I in C.A. 1931/68 .
2271 of 1968.
1931 to 1933/68.
C. Setalvad, V. B. Patel and 1.
