The plaintiffs case, in brief, was that they were gairdakhilkar cultivators and that Rao Jagdish Singh, defendant No.
Appeal by special leave fro.m the judgment and order dated September 24, 1956 of Madhya Pradesh Now Madhya Pradesh High Court at Gwalior in Civil Misc.
2 and 3, by interfering with the possession of the plaintiffs.
145 of 1965.
The plaintiffs prayed that a decree for possession may be passed in their favour against all the defendants.
24 of 2000 S.Y. in the Court of Tehsildar, Pargana Pichhore, District Gwalior, for the possession of some agricultural land under s. 326 of Qanoon Mal.
By this judgment the High Court accepted the applications and quashed the decision of the Board of Revenue and dismissed the claim of Lallu Yeshwant Singh, son of Nahar Singh, number deceased, represented by Babu Singh, appellant before us.
The Collector on appeal upheld the order.
227 of the Constitution by Rao Jagdish Singh and others.
The relevant facts for appreciating the points arising in the appeal are as follows.
Yeshwant Singh and other sons of Lallu Nahar Singh, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiffs, filed a suit against Rao Jagdish Singh and 4 others Revenue Case No.
The Tehsildar decreed the suit.
92 of 1955, filed under Art.
The Commissioner on further appeal also upheld the order.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
On revision, the Board of Revenue agreed with the Commissioner and dismissed the revision.
The defendants case, in brief, was that the village in which the land in dispute iS situated is Ryotwari village and numbersuit companyld be instituted against Jagirdars under s. 326.
S. Bindra, P.W. Sahasrabudde and A.G. Ratnaparkhi, for the appellant.
91 of 1955.
91 of 1955, read with Civil Miscellaneous Application No.
Application No.
Rameshwar Nath and Mahinder Narain, for respondents Nos.
1 to 3.
The defendants further alleged that the plaintiffs had failed to pay revenue and their rights had been extinguished under s. 82 of Qanoon Ryotwari.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Sikri, J. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Bharat in Civil Miscellaneous Application No,.
1, had forcibly prevented the plaintiffs from doing cultivation and got the disputed land cultivated by defendants Nos.
