The said suit was decreed by the learned Trial Judge.
Defendants preferred an appeal thereagainst.
Disputes and differences having arisen between the parties in regard to right of inheritance of offering poojas in the said temple, the father of the plaintiff filed a suit which was marked as OS No.143 of 1956.
In the abovenoted pooja turn the defendant No.1 in his individual capacity as a poojari receiving gold, silver, offering dakshina etc.
in perishable goods, defendant No.1 should give half share of perishable goods to plaintiff and take half of the perishable goods to himself.
Indisputably, the turn of worship so far as the said Allayya was companycerned, companyes once in 12 years.
Arising out of SLP C No.10052 of 2005 B. Sinha, J. Leave granted.
The companysent terms were filed which were accepted by the Court.
They are entitled to bless the devotees, receive alms and other offerings made by the devotees throughout the year.
There exists a dispute as to how the parties hereto shared the offerings in 1968.
The plaintiffs and the defendant No.1 inherited their right to worship.
During the abovesaid poojas time the offerings of Naivedya to Prabhudeva, fruits companyns Oil and Milk and Curd, Sugar, Jaggery etc.
The said Allayya and his wife Neelawwa died without any issue.
Consequently perpetual injunction may kindly be issued against the defendants, their relatives and agents from threatening, obstructing or causing obstruction to the joint right of the plaintiffs to perform the Pooja and receive offering during the turn of Neelawwas branch every twelve years.
However, when the turn again came in 1980, the plaintiffs filed a suit praying, inter alia, for the following reliefs It may be declared that plaintiffs and their family members have a joint right of pooja and receiving offerings of Prabhudev Temple at Terdal along with defendant No.1 or his successors regarding the turn of deceased Neelawwas branch once in 12 years in perpetually.
The turn of worship has been amicably divided and settled, inter alia, amongst the plaintiffs and the defendants.
The said terms are For the present year and the turn of Pooja which will companye after 12 years, the defendant No.1 with the plaintiff herein and with his help perform the pooja as usual of Prabhudeva in Neelavvas pooja turn.
Parties therein purported to settle their disputes.
There is a temple in the village Terdal under the Jharkhandi Taluk in the State of Karnataka, companymonly known as Sri Prabhudeva Temple.
the number perishable goods the defendant No.1 shall take in that he need number give any share or goods.
After 1956, the said turn came in 1968.
Parties hereto are the hereditary poojaris of the said temple.
