Both these seats were earmarked for outsiders as per the 30 point roster.
12310/96 SLP C No.13705/95 Respondent No.1 appeared in the Civil Service Examination companyducted by the Union Public Service Commission in the year 1985.
Hence the first respondent was allocated to the State of Haryana.
He challenged this allocation by filing an application before the Chandigarh Bench of the Central Administative Tribunal.
The Tribunal has allowed the application and directed the appellant Union of India to companysider the transfer of respondent No.1 from the Haryana cadre to the Nagaland cadre in the manner set out in the order.
The present appeal is from the order of the Tribunal.
The home State of respondent No.1 is Nagaland and he gave his preference for allocation to his home State cadre.
Present Honble the Chief Justice Honble M.S. Justice Sujata V.Manohar R.Reddy, Additional Solicitor General, K.N.Shukla, Sr.
Ms. Shashi Kiran Adv, for Ms.Anil Katiyar, Adv.
with them for the Appellant Pankaj Kalra and B.K.Sharma, Advs.
Civil Appeal No.
There were two seats which were available for allocation to Nagaland.
for the Respondent in C.A.No.
V.S,Rao, Advs.
12310/96 Rajeev K.Singh, Adv.
for the Respondent in A.No.12325/96 J U D G M E N T The following Judgment of the Court was delivered Mrs. Sujata V.Manohar, J. Leave granted in both the special leave petitions.
He was selected for appointment to the Indian Administrative Service in the 1986 batch.
