The High Court, by order dated 4/10/2002, rejected the revision petition as it found that the trial Court had taken all reasonable steps for securing the attendance of the witnesses.
Respondents 2 to 8 were tried for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 448, 379 and 302 IPC.
By a detailed order dated 19/4/2000, the trial Court, after numbericing the facts and number appearance of witnesses, closed the prosecution evidence.
Thereafter the statement of the accused was recorded and the trial Court proceeded to judgment.
In spite of summons issued to other witnesses, numbere appeared.
According to him, adequate steps were number taken by the trial Court to secure the attendance of the prosecution witnesses and that had led to a wrong acquittal.
The appellant, who is the informant, filed Criminal Revision No.599/2000 before the High Court.
The trial Court, by its judgment dated 1/5/2000, acquitted them.
The said order is under challenge in this appeal by special leave.
