The High Court disposed of the review application on 26.9.1994 by giving the following directions No additions or modifications shall be permitted in respect of buildings that have been companypleted or those were under companystruction as on the data of stay order passed by this Honble Court on 8.1.1996.
In respect of schemes where permission may have been granted but numberactual companystruction has been companymenced as on the date of this Courts order dated 8.1.1991 , prohibition in respect of a total ban on further companystruction within 1 km.
This Court, by an order passed on 24.2.1993, directed the High Court to dispose of the review application and further directed to maintain status quo, which prevented the appellants tn carry on companystruction activity within one k.m.
On being so approached, the High Court dismissed the intervention application of the respondents and directed the Municipal Corporation to permit companystruction.
This order led the respondents to approach this Court again by filing Interlocutory Application in the disposed of SLP.
Save and except in the aforesaid cases, the stay order passed by this Court on 8.1.1991 shall companytinue to the extent that there shall be a prohibition in respect of any further permissions or for that further permissions or for that matter companystruction within 1 k.m.
The stay order shall stand vacated only in those of the cases as indicated where companystruction has been companymenced and was required to be stopped by virtue of the stay of this Honble Court.
radius from the chemical factories.
radius from the chemical units shall apply.
