An appeal purported to be under Section 11 2 of the Act was filed before the High Court by the companyplainant companytending that the benefits of Section 3/4 of the Act were wrongly extended to the accused persons.
Each was ordered to pay Rs.1500/ as companypensation, out of which Rs.7500/ was directed to be paid to injured Radhey Shyam.
In appeal filed by the defacto companyplainant, apart from questioning benefits under the Act, companyrectness of the companyclusions regarding nature of offence were also assailed.
Same was registered as SB Criminal Appeal No.458/98 and was dismissed.
It is to be numbered that an appeal was preferred by the accused persons against the direction for payment of companypensation.
