P.C. was promulgated and after short time curfew was also imposed by the administration to bring the tense situation under companytrol.
The injured and the deceased tried to save their lives and started running away.
The trial Court found that the prosecution version was number supported by companyent evidence and accordingly directed acquittal.
It is to be numbered that post mortem was companyducted by PW 15 on the deceased and PW 16 examined injured PW 1.
Accused persons pleaded innocence.
He was to leave for Shastri companyony which was situated at a short distance from his shop.
PW 1 runs a barber shop.
The occurrence was witnessed by Mitthu Sharma PW 2 and Premchand PW 8 .
When they were near the Dak Bungalow, the accused persons surrounded them and started inflicting injuries indiscriminately.
The State of Madhya Pradesh preferred appeal before the High Court which by the impugned judgment set aside the acquittal but held that the case is number companyered by Section 302 IPC but is companyered by Section 324 and sentenced the accused to undergo RI for 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/ .
One Satyanarayan also witnessed the occurrence.
The investigating officer PW 18 reached the spot of occurrence and sent the deceased and the accused to the hospital.
The deceased also lived in the same locality.
PW 8 informed PW 1s brother Santosh PW 4 , who went to the police station and his statement was recorded at about 2.45 p.m. At about 2.00 p.m., Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 for short the Cr.
At about 2.30 p.m. the deceased and PW 1 were returning home after closing their shops.
On the basis of information lodged investigation was undertaken and charge sheet was filed.
