297/ .
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated May 10, 1963 of the Punjab High Court Circuit Bench in S.A.O. No.
and parted with possession of the whole of the premises to the appellant.
A Letters Patent Appeal from the order dated May 10, 1963 was dismissed on December 11, 1963 on the ground that the appeal was number maintainable, and an appeal to this Court from the last order was dismissed on January 18, 1965.
T. Desai and Gopal Singh for Harbans Singh, for respon dents Nos.
Gurcharan Singh and Gopal Singh for Harbans Singh, for respondents Nos.
The Controller later heard the application and made an order in favour of the respondents for recovery of possession of the premises from the appellant alone.
149 of 1965.
On October 6, 1959, the respondents filed an application before the Rent Controller, Delhi praying for eviction of the tenant and the appellant.
The appellant then moved the High Court of Punjab for setting aside the order of the Tribunal, but there also it was unsuccessful.
The appellant has number preferred this appeal from the order dated May 10, 1963 by special leave granted by this Court.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
3 to 5.
An appeal by the appellant to the Rent Control Tribunal under the Act against this order was dismissed.
B. Agarwala, B.R.L. lyengar, P.N. Chaddha, S.K. Mehta and K.L. Mehta, for the appellant.
The tenant, a limited companypany, had gone into voluntary liquidation on September 26, 1959 and it was finally wound up and dissolved on October 29, 1960.
Bachawat, J. Originally one Amar Sarup owned the land and building at plot No.
Sarkar and Bachawat, JJ.
Alleging that the transfer had been made without their companysent, the respondents made an application under el.
On its dissolution, the tenant ceased to exist, and by order of the Rent Controller, its name was struck off from the array of parties in the pending application.
Sometime thereafter, Amar Sarup transferred the property to the respondents.
It has number companye to this Court in further appeal.
By an order dated October 10, 1962, the Rent Controller passed an order of eviction against the appellant.
b of the proviso to sub s. 1 of s. 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 to the Controller appointed under it against Allen Berry Co. and the appellant for an order for recovery of possession of the premises from them.
In or about May, 1959, the tenant assigned the tenancy rights.
40 D of 1963.
An appeal by the appellant to the Rent Control Tribunal, Delhi was dismissed on January 23, 1963, and a second appeal to the Punjab High Court was dismissed on May 10, 1963.
By a lease dated March 1, 1956, Amar Sarup leased the property to Allen Berry Co. Calcutta Ltd., hereinafter referred to as the tenant for a period of five years on a monthly rent of Rs.
While the application was pending, Allen Berry Co. went into liquidation and was in due companyrse dissolved and its name was, thereupon, struck off from the records of the proceedings.
5, Block M, Connaught Circus, New Delhi.
