It purported to have passed an order to the said effect only on 30.1.1997.
In the said writ Petition the following prayers were made for direction upon the Respondents to refund petitioners entire amount which she had deposited on 31.3.1994 for purchase of Flat.
However, under a misconception that the prayer of the appellant in the said writ petition was companyfined to interest on 20 of the amount which had been withdrawn by the respondent Board, a direction was made that the respondent must pay interest at the rate of 6 from the date of the application made by the appellant seeking refund.
the petitioner also prays for companypensation of Rs.
Let the said 20 amount be refunded to the petitioner within a period of three months from today with 6 interest from the date of the application made by the petitioner seeking refund.
Since the physical possession of the Flat is number being given to her.
If the amount is number refunded to the petitioner within a period of three months then from the date of the petitioners entitlement application, the respondents would be obliged to pay interest at the rate of 15 on the delayed payment.
Patna Under the Self Financing Scheme in the year 1994.
1,37,341/ was purported to have been issued by the respondent Board on 11.4.2001.
Appellant filed a writ petition before the High Court in May, 2000 as his representation of the appellant to the effect that the entire amount should be paid back her had number been acceded to.
As the said Cheque did number reach the hands of the appellant and as the fact of issuance of Cheque was disclosed only in the companynter affidavit, the Cheque was revalidated on the request of the appellant.
They were number companystructed within a reasonable period even thereafter.
He deposited a sum of Rs.
Admittedly, 20 of the amount deposited by the appellant was deducted.
During pendency of the said writ petition a Cheque for a sum of Rs.
1.54.876/ on 31.3.1994.
17,000/ on 13.1.1994 and the balance sum of Rs.
Appellant filed an application for allotment of a flat companystructed by the respondent Board at Bahadurpur.
If the respondents were number ready and willing refund the entire amount and wanted to cut 20 of the deposit, the lapses being on their side, they were oblized to inform the petitioner that 100 refund cannot be made.
It companystructs houses for allotment thereof to various categories of people.
The respondent Board purported to have cancelled the allotment made in favour for the appellant on 30.1.1997.
Petitioner also prove for the direction to the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 18 per annum on her entire amount to be calculated from 31.3.1994 to till the actual date of payment.
The respondent is a Corporation companystituted under the Bihar State Housing Board Act.
The flats were number companystructed within the stipulated period.
The respondent filed an application for refund of the amount on 29.10.1996.
Sinha, S.B. Leave granted.
50,000/ for harassing the petitioner.
301/2005 is as to whether the appellant herein is entitled to interest on the entire amount deposited by her with the respondent Board for allotment of a flat.
