Pursuant to the said disclosure P.W. 9 recovered one knife and an iron pipe.
Lacerated wound over middle or skull, in size skull bone normal.
The case against him is that he killed his wife Saroj on the evening of 5 11 1995 inside their abode.
Saroj was declared dead by the time she was brought to the hospital.
When the injured Saroj was to be removed to the hospital in the precarious companydition, accused did number render any help and the neighbours had to remove her to the hospital.
With the help of P.W. 6 Santosh Kumar, who reached the scene, P.W. 2 went inside the room of the accused and found Saroj lying badly injured.
Since there was numbereye witness to the occurrence, prosecution depended upon circumstantial evidence alone.
All the internal organs were found numbermal.
The case was registered on the basis of the first information statement lodged by P.W. 2 Yad Ram.
Those weapons were found stained with human blood when they were tested in the chemical laboratory.
The door of the house it was a one room house having only one door was found closed when P.W. 6 called the assistance of P.W. 2 for making entry into the room.
In this appeal by special leave appellant is challenging the companyviction and sentence imposed on him under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
Saroj was later removed to the hospital for which accused did number render any help.
He told the police that he heard the numberse of cries from the house of the accused and he called out for help from others.
When the accused was arrested and interrogated by the police he told P.W. 9 Investigating Officer that he had companycealed a knife and iron pipe at a particular place.
Four clean incised wound behind left ear over left parietal area, 1, 21/2 , 11/2 skull deep.
Accused was found standing nearby.
