On appeal before the Division Bench it was held that the respondent would though be entitled to the amount of full salary as subsistence allowance but from 10.3.1994 to 14.7.2001, the date on which the respondent was dismissed from service.
The respondent filed a writ petition number9730 of 1995 with a prayer for payment of full salary as subsistence allowance in view of clause 5 a iii of the Third Bipartite settlement.
On 21.5.1990 a fire broke in the cash cabin in companynection whereof it appears a police report was also lodged on 1.6.1990.
As indicated earlier, the learned single Judge allowed the writ petition holding that the respondent was entitled to full salary as subsistence allowance with effect from 01.06.1991.
A charge sheet was filed against the respondent in the criminal case under Section 409/436 of the Indian Penal Code in July, 1993.
The appeal preferred against the said order by the bank remained unsuccessful and it was held that the respondent was entitled to full salary as subsistence allowance but with effect from 10.3.1994 to 14.07.01.
The appeal of the respondent was, however, allowed and his companyviction and sentence was set aside by the appellate Court by order dated 10.3.1994.
The petitioner was placed under suspension during the regular departmental action.
A charge memo was issued to the respondent by the appellant on 29.12.1993.
After the acquittal of the respondent an enquiry officer was appointed on 13.9.1994 to hold an enquiry into the departmental proceedings.
The respondent was companyvicted by the Trial Court by order dated 25.1.1994.
It also did number accept the case of the appellant that the respondent was responsible for prolonging the enquiry.
The respondent was employed as a clerk in the appellant Andhra Bank and was working as cashier at Chennai.
