The trial companyrt ordered on February 19, 1959 ejectment and payment of Rs.
Previously he had number relied upon the new Act although the Act had been in force during the pendency of the previous proceedings.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated March 25, 1964 of the Punjab High Court, Circuit Bench at Delhi in Review Application No.
During the companyrse of that revision he invoked the provisions of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1956 which had companye into force on February 9, 1959 and relied upon S. 14 1 j of the new Act read with S. 57.
389 of 1966.
C. Misra, Bishambee Lal and R. K. Puri, for the respon The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Hidayatullah.
B. Agarwala, Uma Mehta, M. L. Kapur and K. K. Sinha, for the appellant.
The landlord later filed an application for review of the order and pointed out that the new Act was number applicable to the case in view of the first proviso of S. 57 sub.
A revision application was then filed by the tenant on March 25, 1960.
23 D of 1963.
CIVIL APPELLATE, JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
2687 in Kinari Bazar, Delhi from the respondent on Rs.
An appeal against the order of the trial companyrt was dismissed by the appellate authority on November 16, 1959.
145/ as arrears of rent.
C.J., This is an appeal by a tenant who had rented a shop No.
The landlord thereupon filed a suit against him for his eviction under S. 13 1 k of the Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952.
In those premises he was selling Usha sewing machines and fans.
13.50 P per month.
It appears that the level of the shop was too high from the road and his clients were troubled in going to his shop and so he lowered the level and thereby altered the premises to suit his companyvenience.
The suit was filed on November 13, 1957.
