No.161 of 2018.
2 herein .
Defendant Nos.
1 and 2 .
1 and 2 in relation to the supplies made up to 19.03.2018.
1, 2 and one more defendant on the original civil jurisdiction side before the High Court at Madras.
1 and 2 were disposed of.
2 to the appellants defendant Nos.1 and 2 and, therefore, prohibitory order be passed against respondent No.2 herein restraining them from paying money to the appellants defendant Nos.
1 and 2 appellants herein felt aggrieved by the order dated 28.03.2018 filed appeal S.A. No.
By impugned order, the appeal was dismissed resulting in upholding of the order dated 13.03.2018 and 28.03.2018, which gives rise to filing of this appeal by way of special leave by defendant Nos.
In that application, it was alleged that a sum of Rs.24,00,00,000/ Rs.
1 and 2 whereas respondent No.1 is the plaintiff in the civil suit out of which this appeal arises.
1 filed a civil suit being C.S. Comm.
the amount claimed in the suit by the plaintiff.
It is filed for the recovery of Rs.19,54,29,693/. Respondent No.1 plaintiff , on 06.03.2018, filed an application A.No.2215/2018 along with the plaint seeking prohibitory order against the Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation TASMAC respondent No.
The appellants then filed an application on 20.03.2018 and sought vacation of the ex parte prohibitory interim order dated 13.03.2018.
155/2018 before the Division Bench.
On 13.03.2018, the Single Judge of the High Court passed ex parte prohibitory interim order against the appellants defendant Nos.
1 and 2 in this Court against the order of the Division Bench dated 04.06.2018.
161/2018 against appellant Nos.
The appellants are defendant Nos.
1 and 2 in relation to supply of companyl.
Twenty four crores is payable by respondent No.
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Leave granted.
By order dated 28.03.2018, the Single Judge, in substance, affirmed the order dated 13.03.2018 and directed that it is made applicable on TASMAC qua appellant Nos.
In this way, both applications, i.e., one filed by the plaintiff and the other filed by defendant Nos.
On 06.03.2018, respondent No.
This appeal is filed against the judgment and order dated 04.06.2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Original Side Appeal Commercial Division No.155 of 2018 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA appeal filed by the appellants herein and companyfirmed Date 2018.09.24 170318 IST Reason the order dated 28.03.2018 passed by the Single Judge of the High Court in Application No.2527 of 2018 in Application No.2215 of 2018 in C.S. Comm.
1 and 2 to the extent of Rs.19,54,29,693/,i.e.,
The suit is inter alia founded on certain companymercial transactions executed between the plaintiff and defendant Nos.
Few facts need mention infra for the disposal of this appeal, which involves a short point.
