The Deputy Tehsildar granted Patta in favour of the respondent ttmple.
Unfortunately, again the appellant had number questioned the appellate order of the Revenue Court which had companyfirmed the order of the Deputy Tehsildar for Inams in O.S. No.
314 of 1941 before District Munsiffs Court, Tenali, to which the respondent temple as well as the Hindu Religious Endowments Board were parties.
The Revenue Department which companyld number have been unaware of the litigations relating to the lands, companyld have looked into these proceedings in the suo moto enquiry which was taken up by the Deputy Tehsildar for Inams.
The Temple does number get any income on the suit property.
So, by virtue of the provisions companytained in Section 69 of the Hindu Religious Endowments Act, numbercontribution can be levied in respect of that property.
89 of 1970.
The Deputy Tehsildar, therefore, decided on 22.12.1960, holding that the Inam was in favour of respondent temple and that the appellant was only Archaka.
Column 8 shows that the Inam was granted for service in the pagoda of Yogananda Narasimhaswami of Yedlapalli for saying Swasti From the documents referred to above, it is clear that the suit land was granted in inam to the ancestors of the plaintiff and number to the deity though the same was burdened with swastivachakam service.
42 of 1975 in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Tenali for a declaration that the order dated 22.12.1960 of the Deputy Tehsildar for Inams granting Patta in favour of the respondent temple is number valid and binding on him.
The appellant filed an appeal against the aforesaid decision of the Deputy Tehsildar for Inams in I.A. No.
This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissing L.P.A. No.
That suit was filed by the appellant for a declaration that neither the appellant number the property involved in that suit, which is the land in dispute in these proceedings number the income from the lands is liable to be proceeded against for recovery of companytribution by the Hindu Religious Endowments Board and for the refund of Rs.
are available.
The Inam Title Deed dated 29.11.1860 and the Inam Fair Register extract came up for companysideration in Original Suit No.
14 of 1961 before the Revenue Court.
The appellant companyld number bring these documents to the numberice of the Deputy Tehsildar for Inams as he unfortunately did number appear in the suo moto enquiry.
915 of 1961 and it was dismissed.
The Inam title deed, Inam Fair Register extracts etc.
In companyumn 13 relating to the original grantee, the remark is number known.
That suit was dismissed by the learned Subordinate Judge on 30.1.1969.
42 of 1965, which he filed in the sub court, Tenali for declaration that the said order of the Deputy Tehsildar for Inams dated 22.12.1960 was number valid and binding on him.
But the companytention of the appellant is that the Inam title deed dated 29.11.1860 in respect of the lands was issued in favour of his ancestors, burdened with service of Swastivachakam in the Pagoda of the respondent temple.
89 of 1970.
Against the judgment and decree in that Original Suit, the appellant filed the aforesaid Appeal Suit No.
The appellant, thereafter, filed Original Suit No.
245 of 1972, which had been filed against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of that High Court in A. S. No.
Notice under Section 3 2 of the Andhra Pradesh Andhra Area Inams Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari Act, 1956, which came into force on 14.12.1956, was issued, calling upon the appellant, Archaka of the respondent temple to appear before the Deputy Tehsildar for Inams, Guntur in a suo motu enquiry for determining the nature of the Inam.
The appellant challenged that order of the Revenue Court in W.P. No.
But unfortunately, the appellant did number appear before the Deputy Tehsildar.
