2177 of 2005.
For the said purpose, the Tribunal applied the multiplier of 7.
An appeal in terms of Section 173 1 of the Act was preferred by the appellants.
3,38,000/ .
She at the time of her death was aged about 52 years and 9 months.
The salary certificate produced on behalf of the claimants appellants showed that she was drawing a monthly salary of Rs.8611/ Rs.6050/ basic pay, Rs.2481/ dearness allowance and Rs.80/ house rent per mensum.
She died on the spot.
She was to superannuate on 28.02.2011.
The Tribunal, however, taking into companysideration only the basic pay passed an award awarding companypensation for a sum of Rs.
Indisputably, the deceased was an Assistant teacher in a primary school.
The deceased Puspa Matolya was travelling in a Tata Sumo on the fateful day, viz.,
The said school was a State run one.
Whether dearness allowance and house rent allowance payable to a deceased should be taken into companysideration for the purpose of companyputing the amount of companypensation payable in terms of the provisions of Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for short the Act is the question involved in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 14.02.2007 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in M.A. No.
30.11.2002 at about 11.00 a.m. It dashed against a mango tree.
Still number satisfied with the quantum of companypensation awarded in their favour, the appellants are before us.
5,28,000/ by applying the multiplier of 11.
B. SINHA, J Leave granted.
The basic fact of the matter is number in dispute.
