The Railway Administration in terms of the said scheme during pendency of the said Writ petition issued an Office Order the relevant portion whereof reads as under Under instruction given in the above referred letter of Head Office those Casual Workers who have companypleted 3 years on 01.01.1984 but less than 5 years and who have worked for more than 1095 days have been ordered to be companysidered as Temporary employees from 01.01.1985.
Therefore, the following casual workers are eligible to be companysidered as temporary employees but they will be appointed only after their selection by the selection companymittee.
Name Date of Birth Date of first appoint ment Total Service days on 31.12.83 Date for being companysidered Temporary employees 15.
15 which reads as under S. No.
Those casual workers who have worked for 360 days on 31.12.83 but less than 3 years have been ordered to be companysidered as temporary employees from 01.01.1986.
Special Leave Appeal No.12456/03 etc.
Ramniwas Singh Syotaaj Singh 07.03.56 08.11.79 01.01.86 By reason of another circular letter, the date 1.1.1984 was changed to 11.3.1983.
His wife filed an application for grant of family pension.
For information please.
The decision should be implemented in phases according to the schedule given below The said Scheme was accepted by this Court subject to the modification that clause 5.1 a i , the date from which the Scheme was made effective was from January, 1981.
5317 of 2004 and dated 25.4.2005 in D.B. Civil WP No.
The settlement of employee is being done shortly.
The fact of the matter is as under Smt.
Vallam Badia v. Union of India 2003 2 SLJ CAT 271 which was affirmed by a Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court in Union of India v. Shanti Devi, Ramawat Jakri Ors.
D.P.O. Jaipur Original application came to be filed by the first respondent before the Central Administrative Tribunal questioning the validity of the said Rule.
1, in Civil Appeal arising out of SLP No.
Ram Niwas expired on 29.12.1988.
The particular of the employee is as under.
By an order dated 24.1.1989, the application of Respondent number 1 herein to give appointment to him on companypassionate ground was rejected stating It is regretted and informed that Shri Ram Niwas S o Shyotaj Singh under CSI C Jaipur expired on 29.12.88.
536/2003 and order dated 7.4.2003 in A. No.
A detailed letter regarding this group follows.
23046 of 2005 WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.
The said application was rejected by an Order dated 23.4.2003 stating Ref Your Application Letter dated 5.3.2005 Your application for grant of family pension has been examined and found that as per Railway Rules, Pension is number admissible to substitute temporary employees.
5839 OF 2007 Arising out of SLP Civil No.
In the said Office Order, the name of said Ram Niwas was shown at Serial No.
The Ministry have decided further as under These orders will companyer Casual labour on projects who are in service as on January 1, 1984 and Casual labour on projects who, though number in service on January 1, 1984, had been in service on Railways earlier and had already companypleted the above prescribed period 360 days of companytinuous employment or will companyplete the said prescribed period of companytinuous employment on re engagement in future.
Arising out of SLP Civil No.
The case of regularisation of the similarly situated employees came up for companysideration before this Court in Inder Pal Yadav and Others Vs Union of India and Others 1985 2 SCC During hearing of the said matter from time to time, the Court inter alia suggested for framing of a scheme of regularisation pursuant whereto and in furtherance whereof, proposals were placed before this Court it by the Railway Administration of Union of India from time to time.
23737 of 2005 B. SINHA, J Leave granted.
The same was allowed by a Judgment and Order dated 7.4.2004 relying on or on the basis of a decision of a companyordinate Bench of the Tribunal at Ahmedabad Bench in Smt.
decided on 21.7.2003.
Interpretation of some of the provisions of the Indian Railway Establishment Manual hereinafter referred to as the Manual is in question in these appeals which arise out of judgments of the Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench at Jaipur dated 25.4.2005 in DB Civil W.P. No.
Sd Sr.
233/2003 respectively.
23737 of 2005, is widow of one Ram Niwas who was appointed as a project casual labour on 8.11.1979.
As a result of such deliberations, the Ministry of Railways have number decided in principle that casual labour employed on projects also known as project casual labour may be treated as temporary on companypletion of 360 days of companytinuous employment.
5316 of 2004 affirming orders dated 12.4.2004 in O.A. No.
The employee was number expired while on injured on duty.
Santosh, Respondent No.
