3027 of 1984 Appeal by Special leave from the Judgment and Order dated the 9th day of April, 1984 of the Bombay High Court in P. No.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
R. Lalit and Mrs. J. Wad for the Appellants.
A. Bobde and A.G. Ratnaparkhi for the Respondent.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by BHAGWATI, J. The respondent filed an application under clauses 13 3 vi and vii of the C.P. and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order of 1949 hereinafter referred to as HRC Order to evict petitioner No.
This companytention ultimately came to be companysidered by a learned single Judge of the High Court at Nagpur.
The firm of Chhotelal Pyarelal raised a preliminary companytention that numberapplication companyld be maintained against a partnership firm and such an application was liable to be rejected.
This view taken by the Division Bench is assailed in the present appeal filed by the firm of M s. Chhotelal Pyarelal with special leave obtained from this Court.
The respondent alleged that the firm was a tenant in respect of the premises and eviction of the firm was sought on the ground of bona fide requirement of the respondent for the purpose of his occupation under paragraph vi as also for the purpose of making essential repairs under paragraph vii of Clause 13 3 .
1 firm of M s. Chhotelal Pyarelal.
51 of 1979.
