The trial companyrt decreed the suit subject to payment of damages for improvements.
On appeal, the District Court companyfirmed the decree for redemption but set aside the decree for damages.
In second appeal, the High Court companyfirmed the decree of the appellate companyrt.
Thus this appeal.
From the Judgment and Order dated 6.8.1973 of the Gujarat High Court in Second Appeal No.98 of 1973.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
1890 of 1974.
K. Dholakia and P. Narasimhan for the Respondents.
The appellants predecessor was inducted in Field Nos.439 and 676 as, an usufructuary mortgagee in the year 1945.
The following Order of the Court was delivered This appeal under Article 136 is against the judgment of the High Court of Gujarat in Second Appeal No.98 of 1973 dated August 6, 1973.
V. Goswami for the Appellants.
On expiry of the period of redemption prescribed therein, that is, 25 years, the suit for redemption was filed in 1970 by the respondents.
