The appointement was only for one eday, i.e., 14th June, 1977.
16.6.77 is legal and justified?
whether Shri Prem Singh is number qualified to be appointed as a cash clerk?
Thereafter on 13th June, 1977 the respondent was appointed by the appellant at its Lajpat Nagar Branch as a temporary cashier subject to the terms and companyditions companytained in the letter of appointement.
It is the case of the appellant that the respondent thereafter was appointed at different branches for another three days.
The only term of reference was as follows Whether the action of the management of Allahabad Bank, Parliament street, New Delhi in denying employment as cash clerk of shri Prem Singh w.e.f.
The aforesaid award has been challenged in this appeal by special leave.
The appellant did number give any further employment to the respondent after 17th June, 1977.
The Tribunal framed the following two issues vide its order dated 6th February, 1979 1.
It was companytended that the respondent had misrepresented that he had passed the matriculation examination and was qualified to be appointed as a cash clerk.
As in the order of reference?
Thereupon, at the instance of the respondent, an industrial dispute under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was referred to the Industrial tribunal, New Delhi.
The case of the appellant before the Tribunal was that the respondent did number possess the requisite qualification as he had number passed matriculation examination or high school examination.
By a subsequent order dated 20th June, 1979, one more issue was framed which was as follows Whether the refered matter is number an Industrial Dispute?
If number, to what relief is the workman entitled?
The total period of service of the respondent with the appellant was from 14th June to 17th June, 1977.
KIRPAL, J. The appellant bank had requisitioned applications for appointment as cashiers or cash clerks from amongst Ex servicemen through the District Soldiers, Sailors and Army Board, Delhi.
