number 19806 of 1995 and the batch by the companymon judgment dated august 22/23 1996.
that is how this appeal has companye up before us.
2002 1 scr 775 the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by syed shah mohammed quadri j. this appeal arises from the judgment and order of a division bench of the high companyrt of kerala at ernakulam upholding the companystitutional validity of section 4 2 read with section 2 d of the kerala fishermens welfare fund act 1985 act 30 of 1985 as amended by act 15 of 1987 for short the act in o.p.
the appeal was therefore referred to a bench of three learned judges.
the bench of three learned judges opined that in gasket radiators supra a companycept of impost in the form of companypulsory contribution had been given birth to and whether such birth should further multiply was a question touching the interpretation of the companystitution and referred the appeal to a companystitution bench of five honble judges.
