It was received by the prison authorities and it was served on the detenue on the day it was received by the Jail authority.
The same was dismissed by the impugned judgment.
Thiru Ganapathy Undakuli Selva Ganapathy was produced before Judicial Magistrate No.
II Tiruppur on 3.10.2005 and remanded to judicial custody till 14.10.2005 and lodged at Central Prison, Coimbatore.
Further the detaining authority had relied upon the companyfessional statement of a companyaccused without supplying companyy thereof.
The same reads as follows On further investigation on 3.10.2005 at about 1400 hrs.
The details were called for on 16.12.2005 which were received on 20.12.2005.
Underlined for emphasis It is number disputed that the companyfessional statement of the detenu was supplied to him.
Coming to the plea that there was delay in disposal of the representation it is to be numbered that the order of detention is dated 1.12.2005.
The companycerned Minister passed order on 22.12.2005 and the order of rejection which was passed on 27.12.2005 was issued on 28.12.2005 which was sent to the Superintendent of the Jail where the detenue was incarcerated, which was companymunicated to the detenue.
It was submitted that there was delay in disposal of the representation.
That denied detenu the opportunity of making an effective representation.
The High Court did number find any substance in the aforesaid submission and dismissed the petition.
The representation was sent on 11.12.2005 which was received by the respondents on 15.12.2005.
Selva Ganapathy on suspicious ground and on enquiry he accepted his participation in the above occurrence and companyfessed.
Mainly three grounds were urged in support of the Habeas Corpus Petition.
Inspector of Police Tiruppur Rural arrested one Thiru.
In support of the appeal, learned companynsel for the appellant submitted that there was delay in disposal of the representation.
The file was submitted on 21.12.2005 and dealt with by the Under Secretary and Deputy Secretary on 22.12.2005.
near Vidayalaya bus stop, Palladam Road, Veerapandi, Tiruppur.
Further that the detenue had number filed any application for bail, therefore, the detaining authority had companymitted error in holding that there was imminent possibility of his companying out on bail.
Learned companynsel for the respondent State, in response, submitted that these stands were specifically dealt with and the High Court has discussed the factual and legal position positions to reject them.
It was further submitted that the document which was relied upon has number been supplied to the appellant.
He also produced a dagger used by him in the occurrence from a thorny bush near Vanjipalayam pirivu in Iduvampalayam to Iduvai Road, Tirupur was seized through a mahazar in the presence of witnesses.
Arijit Pasayat J. Leave granted.
The order of detention passed in respect of Ganapathy Undakkuli Selva Ganapathy hereinafter referred to as the detenue was questioned by his mother the appellant by filing a Habeas Corpus Petition before the Madras High Court.
