Her application form was accepted and she was issued an admitted card for the written test to be companyducted by the FCI.
She was ranked sixth in the merit list.
By the impugned judgment and order, the Division Bench has allowed the appeal preferred by the original writ petitioner and has quashed and set aside the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition and companysequently has set aside the action of the FCI rejecting the case of the original writ petitioner.
The facts leading to the present appeal in nutshell are as under That the appellant herein the original respondent FCI invited applications for the post of Assistant GradeII Hindi by publishing an advertisement on 14.02.2015.
While passing the impugned judgment and order, the Division Bench has observed and held that companysidering the certificates produced by the original writ petitioner dated 14.01.2015 and 18.07.2016, the original writ petitioner can be said to have the requisite experience of translation from English to Hindi and viceversa, and companysidering the fact that the original writ petitioner ranked 6 th in the merit list, therefore otherwise was found to be meritorious, the Division Bench of the High Court held that FCI was number justified in denying the appointment to the original writ petitioner.
A call letter was issued to her on 31.12.2015.
Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court, the FCI has preferred the present appeal.
The list of selected candidates was published on the website of the FCI on 2.5.2016, in which her name did number figure.
Therefore, a representation was submitted by her on 6.5.2016, which was number companysidered favourably.
Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition, the original writ petitioner preferred Letters Patent Appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court.
It should be numbered that before the learned Single Judge, the original writ petitioner produced the certificates issued by her erstwhile employer in support of her case that she had an experience of translation from English to Hindi and vice versa.
However, she did number receive the final letter of appointment.
The written test was held on 4.10.2015.
Before the learned Single Judge, it was the case on behalf of the FCI that the original writ petitioner was number finally selected as she did number produce any experience certificate to show that she had one years experience of translation from English to Hindi and viceversa.
Therefore, the original writ petitioner approached the High Court by way of a writ petition.
3.1 The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition holding that since the original writ petitioner did number have requisite experience of one year for translation work from English to Hindi and viceversa, the FCI was justified in denying her employment.
The original writ petitioner was shortlisted.
She was asked to report at the Zonal office of the FCI and produce her original documents, which were retained by the FCI and after verification, the same were returned.
R. SHAH, J. Leave granted.
Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 03.08.2018 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in L.P.A. No.
383 of 2018, by which the Division Bench has allowed the said appeal preferred by the respondent herein the original writ petitioner Signature Not Verified and has quashed and set aside the judgment and order passed Digitally signed by VISHAL ANAND Date 2019.04.09 180731 IST Reason by the learned Single Judge of the High Court, dismissing the writ petition preferred by the original writ petitioner and companysequently quashed and set aside the action of the Food Corporation of India hereinafter referred to as the FCI rejecting the case of the original writ petitioner for appointment on the post of Assistant GradeII Hindi , the original respondent the appellant herein has preferred the present appeal.
The original writ petitioner applied for the said post on 16.03.2015.
