The two appellants and one Kashmir Singh were companyvicted by the trial companyrt for the offence punishable under Sections 307 and 506 both read with Section 34 IPC, by the companyrt of Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad, in Sessions Case No.
Kashmir Singh fired two shots from his pistol and causeed injuries to Bhagwan Singh and Malkiat S ingh.
The trial companyrt disbelieved tthe defence case that someone else and fired at them and caused injuries and that they were falsely involved because o f property dispute.
After appreciating their evidence, the trial companyrt thought it safe to rely upon it and also upon the evidence of Lattkan singh P.W.7 and Jagir Singh P.W.8, who hadd rushed to the place of the incident on hearing the cries of the injured.
All the companyvicted accused then filed a Special leave petition in this companyrt.
In order to prove its case, the prosecution examined the two injured eye witnesses and also led other evidence.
There upon, the appellants exhorted Kashmir singh to finish Bhagwan Singh.
Bhagwan Singh told them that as he was the real owner of the house, the question of vacating it did number arise.
Leave was number granted to Kashmir Singh.
The prosecution case against the appellants was that on 31.8.88 at about 6.00 p.m., they went to the house of Bhagwan Singh and enquired from him whether he was willing or number to vacate the house in his possession.
It was granted to the appellants only.
The H igh Court companyfirmed their companyviction.
31/88.
