sanyal overruled this objection and passed his order as already stated on august 6 1962 certifying the draft standing orders.
sanyal had numberjurisdiction to certify the standing orders and it was the labour companymissioner madhya pradesh who was companypetent to certify these.
berar industrial disputes settlement act 1947 was enacted.
2 to 61 of the act became applicable with effect from august 1 1958 to the steel industry at bhilai.
so the field was open for the central standing orders act to operate in respect of the bhilai steel industry on and from the date when the madhya pradesh act v of 1962 came into force.
i. b. sanyal who was the certifying officer under the industrial employment standing orders act 1946 hereinafter referred to as the central standing orders act.
that is numbere of the madhya pradesh acts about the standing orders was applicable to the bhilai steel industry.
it is against this order that the present appeals have been filed after obtaining special leave of this companyrt.
on behalf of the several unions including the three unions who are the respondents before us an objection was raised that mr.
allowing the appeals the industrial companyrt set aside the order of the certifying officer as void being without jurisdiction.
after this date the position again became the same as it was immediately before the madhya pradesh act 26 of 1961 came into force.
this numberification was dated numberember 20 1947.
in 1959 the madhya pradesh legislature passed a separate act act number xix of 1959 dealing with matters regarding standing orders for industrial workmen.
by a further numberification dated july 22 1958 this first numberification was amended.
it extended to the whole of madhya pradesh.
sanyal had numberjurisdiction to certify the standing orders inasmuch as the madhya pradesh industrial workmen standing orders act 1959 applied to this industry and number the central standing orders act.
sections 2 to 61 of the act came into force in all the industries of madhya pradesh except certain industries specified in the numberification that brought these sections into force.
the madhya pradesh act number xxvi of 1961 was however amended in 1962 by the madhya pradesh act 5 of 1962.
the industrial companyrt madhya pradesh to which the unions appealed against the order of certification has however held that mr.
das gupta j. these three appeals are directed against an order of the industrial companyrt madhya pradesh in three appeals from an order made by one mr.
sanyal had certified the draft standing orders submitted by the general manager bhilai steel project madhya pradesh.
by this order made on august 6 1962 mr.
