On the other hand Sasvati i.e. daughter of the sage Angirasa, was married to king Asanga.
1996 1 SCR 128 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAMASWAMY, J. C.A. Nos.
The appeal challenging the Division Bench Judgement in respect of Dr. Kanjamma Alex, Civil Appeal No.
1197/ 81 had referred the question to the Full Bench.
Accordingly, the Full Bench overruled the decision of the Division Bench and of the single Judge referred to hereinbefore.
She sought admission into M. Sc.
The special provisions under Articles 15 4 and 16 4 of the Constitution intended for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes of citizens cannot be defeated by including candidates by alliance or by any other mode of joining the companymunity.
Her appointment was questioned by One Rani George by filing a Writ Petition, viz.,
The appellant, a Syrian Catholic a forward class , having married a Latin Catholic, had applied for selection as a reserved candidate.
L. J. 21 Nataraja v. Selection Committee, 1972 1 Mys.
L, J. 226 and R. Srinivasa v. Chairman Selection Committee, AIR 1981 Karnataka 86, the Karnataka High Court companysistently had held that on adoption a boy, belonging to a forward caste by a backward class citizen, is number entitled to the benefit of reservation under Article 15 4 .
The University selected her on that basis and accordingly appointed her against the reserved post.
Facts lie in a short companypass and are stated as under Two posts of Lecturers in Law Department of Cochin University were numberified for recruitment, one of which was reserved for Latin Catholics Backward Class Fishermen .
The approach in reconciling diverse practices, customs and traditions of the marriages as one of the means for social and national unity and integrity and establishment of Indian culture for harmony, amity and self respect to the individuals, is the encouragement to inter caste, inter sect, inter religion marriages from inter region.
416 and 187 of 1992.
The king Svanaya Bhavaya vya i.e. brother in law of Kaksivat was married to Brahmani wife of Angirasa of VIII.
In Smt.
Home Science in Agricultural University as a Scheduled Tribe.
For, as Jesus said, if you love those who love you, what reward have you?
Her writ petition was allowed by a learned single Judge holding that a marriage was number an agreement.
These appeals by special leave arise from the judgment dated January 18, 1995 of the Full Bench of the Kerala High Court in writ appeal Nos.
D. Neelima v. The Dean of P.G, Studies, A.P, Agricultural University, Hyderabad Ors.,
3163 64/95.
She filed writ petition for direction for admission.
She applied for admission into Post Graduate Medical Course C.H. under the quota reserved for Backward Class A Group.
AIR 1993 A.P. 229, the appellant, a Reddy by birth Reddy caste is a forward caste in A.P. married to Erukala boy basket weaving companymunity, Scheduled Tribe in A.P. was living in her marital home since her marriage.
