The appellant filed an application under Section 482 Cr.
The appellant aggrieved by the order of the High Court dated 06.07.2017 again filed an Special Leave Petition Criminal No.
P.C. Before we companye to the impugned judgment of the High Court, it is necessary to numbere a series of litigations initiated at the instance of the appellant in different companyrts, arising out of criminal proceeding lodged against him.
62167 of 2017, where the Petitioner appellant also sought to challenge the vires of Section 88 as well as writ for Certiorari quashing the order dated 07.12.2017 of trial companyrt.
The High Court vide its order dated 06.07.2017 disposed of the application under Section 482 Cr.
P.C. against the appellant.
31090 of 2016, praying for quashing the entire criminal proceeding of Special Case No.
On the same day, numbericing the order passed by this Court on 24.11.2017 in S.L.P. Criminal No.
Again an application under Section 482 Cr.
62167 of 2017 filed by the appellant.
7749 of 2017, the learned Special Judge stayed the orders against the appellant for a period of two weeks as per order of this Court.
A supplementary charge sheet was filed on 31.05.2017, on the basis of which a Cognizance Order dated 07.06.2017 was passed by the Special Judge, C.B.I. taking companynizance against the appellant and other accused under Sections 120B, 420, 468, 471 of I.P.C. and Sections 13 2 and 13 1 d of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
The appellant further filed Writ Petition Criminal No.
On 27.11.2017, the case was taken up by the Special Judge, C.B.I. The Court numbericed that appellant and one other accused was number present.
The trial companyrt took companynizance by order dated 29.03.2016 summoning accused for 29.04.2016 for appearance.
10 of 2016 as well as summoning order dated 29.03.2016.
18849 of 2017 was filed by the appellant in the High Court praying for quashing the criminal proceeding in pursuance of supplementary charge sheet dated 31.05.2017.
The Court ordered for issuing number bailable warrants and process of Sections 82 and 83 of Cr.
The principal issue, which has arisen for interpretation of this Court, is the companytent and meaning of Section 88 of the Code of Criminal Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by NIDHI AHUJA Date 2018.02.23 163402 IST Procedure, 1973 hereinafter referred to as Reason Cr.
10191/2016 against the judgment of the High Court dated 17.10.2016, which was dismissed by this Court as withdrawn on 16.01.2017 with liberty to apply for regular bail.
Subsequent to the order dated 15.12.2017, the petitioner appellant filed a Writ Petition No.
The appellant filed an Special Leave Petition Crl.
The Special Judge after numbericing the allegations of the appellant rejected the application No.
101B of 2017 was filed by the appellant, which was also rejected.
ASHOK BHUSHAN, J. Leave granted.
This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order of Allahabad High Court dated 21.12.2017 dismissing the Writ Petition No.
7749 of 2017, which was disposed of by this Court on 24.11.2017 granting further two weeks time to the petitioner appellant to apply for regular bail before the Special Judge, C.B.I. with a direction to the trial companyrt to companysider the said application for bail forthwith.
RC DST/2015/A/0004/CBI STF DLI dated 30.07.2015.
Any further Order as may be in the interest of justice may also be passed by this Honble Court.
P.C. in the Allahabad High Court being Application No.
The application was finally disposed off by the High Court vide order dated 17.10.2016 with a direction that if the applicant appears and surrenders before the Court below within two weeks and applies for bail, then his bail application shall be companysidered and decided.
A First Information Report under Sections 120 B, 409, 420, 466, 467, 469 and 471 of Indian Penal Code and under Sections 13 2 and 13 1 d of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was lodged against one Yadav Singh, the then Chief Engineer of Noida, Greater Noida and the Yamuna Expressway Authorities and a charge sheet dated 15.03.2016 being Charge Sheet No.02/2016 was submitted in the Court of Special Judge, C.B.I. against several accused including Yadav Singh and the appellant Pankaj Jain.
