What is held proved against the appellant is that his wife, Vijayalakshmi, died an unnatural death within 2 years of their marriage and that before her death she was subjected to harassment by him because she was number bringing from her parents the remaining amount of dowry promised to him.
5 and 15 again heard more numberse companying from the appellants room and therefore, both of them again went there.
5 and 15 heard some numberse companying from the appellants room and when PW.
It was numbericed that Vijaya Lakshmi was sitting under a tap with her body fully burnt.
Their evidence thus clearly establishes that soon before her death she was ill treated by her husband.
Their evidence further proves that ten minutes after Vijayalakshmi had returned to her room P.Ws.
5 went there and enquired had happened the appellant said Sorry Sister and closed the door.
At that time they found that some other neighbours had also gathered there.
As regards the demand of dowry and harassment both the companyrts have thought it fit to accept the evidence.
The appellant then opened the door.
After some P.Ws.
