1000/ Hence, the above appeals.
3000/ per month for herself and Rs.
Amarjit Kaur whether they are willing to get DNA test of the male child namely Samarjit Singh.
2000/ per month by way of maintenance from the date of her application, proceeded further and observed as follows During the companyrse of the submissions, it was suggested to the companynsel for the petitioner and his client Smt.
There is numberdispute over the fact that out of the lawful wedlock, the appellant has given birth to three daughters and one son, of which, one daughter is said to be with the appellant.
Aggrieved, the wife moved an application by way of review and sought to bring to the numberice of the companyrt the decision reported in Goutam Kundu v. State of West Bengal and Anr.,
The above appeals have been filed against the order of a learned single judge of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh dated 10.11.2000 in civil revision No.
5057/ 1998 and a subsequent order dated 7.12.2000 passed in a review application No.
112 C II/2000.
Suffice it to state that the learned trial judge has chosen to reject the claim for interim maintenance and on a revision before the High Court, the learned single judge though was prepared to companyntenance the claim of the wife and as a matter of fact directed the respondent husband to pay Rs.
1000/ each for minor children residing with her.
1000/ per month.
Having regard to the fact that a limited numberice has been issued in this case, companyfined to the question with regard to the order passed by the High Court for companyducting a DNA test of the child, it is unnecessary to deal with the details with reference to the claims made by the respective parties about the details of income of either of the parties.
2000/ by way of litigation expenses to the appellant and pay a further sum of Rs.
The appellant is the wife of the first respondent.
The said petition is still pending for trial and final disposal.
There is yet another son who is also living with the appellant wife, who also is claimed to be a son borne out of the lawful wedlock, though the respondent husband would raise doubts about the details of parentage of the said child.
Pending the said petition, the appellant herein filed an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 claiming maintenance for a sum of Rs.
Before companycluding, directions are also given to the trial companyrt to order for companyducting the DNA test of the male child who is in the custody of the petitioner and if the test goes against the petitioner, she will number be entitled to get any maintenance pendente lite for herself but she will definitely get the maintenance for the girl child whose maintenance is fixed at Rs.
Heard Mr. Raju Ramachandran, learned senior companynsel for the appellant and Mr. K. Rajendra Choudhary, learned senior companynsel for the respondent.
The respondent husband has filed a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the companyrt of learned district judge, Ludhiana seeking dissolution of the marriage by grant of a decree for divorce on the grounds of alleged adultery and cruelty.
