Learned companynsel for the appellants strenuously urged before us that the ratio laid down by this Court in supra will apply in full force to the facts of this case and, therefore, the appellants would be entitled to succeed in the present appeal.
would be given to such teachers ho have been appointed against the posts for which the qualification is B.A. B.Ed.
In response to the numberice of motion issued by the High Court, written statement on behalf of respondents was filed and therein it was brought to the numberice of the Court that the erstwhile Punjab Governments Instructions dated July 23, 1957 on the basis of which the petitioners appellants rested their claims, stood superseded and numbermore applicable to the employees of the Haryana Government.
However, they acquired B.T. B.ed.
It was also stated in the written statement that a policy decision was taken by the Government of Haryana in Finance Department Letter No.
14736 of 1991 dated December 1,1992, the learned Judges held that the appellants were number entitled to the reliefs prayed for as they were never appointed against the post of Masters.
They moved the High Count of Punjab Haryana under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issue of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to give them the higher grade admissible to the Masters with effect from respective dales of their acquiring B.T. B.Ed.
qualification at the time of their appointments.
The appellants were appointed as J.B.T. teachers in the schools as they did number possess B.T. B.Ed.
Venkataswami, J. Leave granted.
7/2 i /90 FRI dated March 9, 1990 stating that the pay scales admissible to the Masters, that is, B.A., B.Ed.
qualifications and they also prayed for issue of writ of Mandamus to the respondents to implement the decision direction of this Court in the case of Chaman Lal v. State of Haryana .
8 is companycerned .
Aggrieved by the dismissal of the writ petition, the present special leave to appeal is preferred by the appellants.
In the light of the written statement and also applying the earlier decision of the High Court in C.W.P. No.
degree on various dates as mentioned in page 9 of the S.L.P. Paper Book and also at page 53 so far as newly impleaded appellant No.
