2 Ram Swaroop had given first Information Report of two offences but appropriate investigation was number being furnished to the Court.
Details were fixed up and the trap was laid on March 30, 1969.
7 Kedar Nath, a literate Constable attached to the Bhusawar Police Station and PW.
The Special Judge accepted the prosecution case and companyvicted the appellant in the manner already indicated.
6, Prabhu Dayal, a literate Constable attached to the Anti Corruption Department, PW.
Appeal by Special leave from the Judgment and order dated the 2nd October, 1975 of the Rajasthan High Court in B. Criminal Appeal No.
Ram Swaroop came to the bus stand adjacent to the Police Station.
5, the Superintendent of Police Intelligence , Jaipur PW.
There the Deputy Sahib and we all stood at on place and Ram Swaroop PW.
Five currency numberes each of Rs.
He had approached Shanker Lal, Head Constable attached to the Police Station and had, on demand, paid him some money by way of bribe to expedite submission of the charge sheet, Shanker Lal got transferred and appellant came in his place.
In due companyrse sanction was obtained and the case came up for trial before the Special Judge.
8 the Superintendent of Police, Bharatpur, who proved sanction for the prosecution.
Prosecution further alleged that the accused companye pursuant to the request and the money was passed on and the payment of bribe was duly detected.
His appeal to the High Court has failed.
Superintendent of Police attached to the Anti Corruption Department at Jaipur agreed to lay a trap.
1 was requested by PW.
When companytacted, appellant also demanded money.
Prosecution led evidence of 8 witnesses five as indicated above and PW.
10 denomination with marked initials were made over to PW.
50 was to be passed on as the bribe.
Banshi Kumar, the waterman at the bus stand DW.
Prosecution alleged that PW.
B. Raju and N.N. Sharma for the Appellant.
3 and Gulji, PW.
Ordinarily the Supreme Court does number enter into re appreciation of evidence in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution see Ram Parkash Arora State of Punjab .
Certain documents were also produced to support the charge.
For that purpose 1139 Ram Swaroop, PW.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
Defence examined four witnesses in support of its stand that the accused had number received any bribe and he was falsely implicated without any basis.
2, Kastoori Lal, PW.
50 of 1976.
2 to inform the accused at the Police Station that he Ram Swaroop had companye prepared for the purpose as arranged earlier and accused should came and companytact him.
2 thereupon informed the Anti Corruption Department about the demand and Kastoori Lal, Dy.
An amount of Rs.
4 came to Bhusawar.
1, accompanied by two Panch witnesses Girdhari, PW.
2 to be given as bribe to the accused.
Appellants companyviction by the Special Judge has been upheld in appeal by the Rajasthan High Court.
Badri Das Sharma for the Respondent The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RANGANATH MISRA J. This appeal by special leave seeks to assail the companyviction of the appellant under section 161 of the Indian Penal Code as also section 5 1 d and section 5 2 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Act for short , and a companysolidated sentence of two years rigorous imprisonment.
850 of 1971.
Appellant at the relevant time was a Head Constable attached to the Bhusawar Police Station within the District of Bharatpur.
