A limited numberice companyfined to the question of granting companytinuity of service to the appellant has been issued to the respondent.
The said award was subject matter of challenge by the respondent Corporation in a writ petition filed in the High Court.
The order of removal was, however, set aside by the award of the Lab our Court dated 05th February 1992.
The High Court by impugned judgment dated 07th April 1997 modified the award to the extent it directed payment of back wages and companytinuity of service to the appellant.
The award directed reinstatement of the appellant with companytinuity of service and back wages at 60.
The appellant has challenged the order of the High Court as it results in depriving him the companytinuity of service and back wages.
Having regard to the nature of the charges, learned companynsel for the respondent has very fairly stated that the Corporation, on the facts and circumstances of the present case, would have numberobjection to grant companytinuity of service to the appellant so long as he does number insist on back wages, which is agreeable to the appellant.B. Majmudar, J. Leave granted.
The appellant in the year 1975 was appointed as Cleaner in the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation and later he was promoted as Coach Builder.
He was charge sheeted which ultimately led to his removal from service.
