In support of his companytention, learned companynsel relied on the decision in Farid Ahmed Abdul Samad Anr.
66 of 1998 filed objections on 13.6.1991.
The appellants urged only two grounds, namely there was numberSection 5A inquiry and the appellants were number given personal hearing regarding the objections filed by them and secondly, the lands owned by them were liable to be exempted as the acquired lands were agricultural lands.
The Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the writ petitions and aggrieved by the same, the present appeals are filed.
Though the appellants had raised several grounds in the writ petitions, those grounds were number urged before us.
The appellants filed writ petitions before the High Court of Punjab Haryana, challenging the acquisition proceedings.
In Civil Appeal No.
Appellants in Civil Appeal No.
Section 6 declaration was made on 18.3.1992 and the award was passed on 15.3.1994.
J U D G M E N T G. BALAKRISHNAN, J. The appellants in these two appeals are land owners whose land was acquired for the purpose of starting an Industrial Focal Point by the State of Punjab.
Notification under Section 4 1 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was published on 7.5.1991.
