The 11th defendant supported the defendants 1 10 in their companytentions.
5,000/ .
PW 4 identified the signature of DW 15 and the other attesting witness and also the thumb impression of the 11th defendant.
There were an oral agreement to that effect prior to the sale and this was reduced to writing under Exhibit P 8.
The amount due to the 11th defendant was repaid in 1944 and she was entitled to all the lands.
The defendant companytended that the sale deed represented the true state of facts and the 11th defendant was entitled to half of the property and that the plaintiff the 11th defendant entered into an oral agreement with D 1 and D 7, as a result of which defendants 1 10 were taken as tenants from 1945 till 1948, that tenancy later became vendees that they were protected tenants under the Andhra Pradesh Telegana Area Tenancy and Agricultural lands Act, 1950.
The defendants have filed this appeal by certificate granted by the High Court.
It further held that the Oral lease set up by defendants 1 10 was number true and that they occupied the lands illegally.
Defendants 1 10 dispossessed the plaintiff of the suit lands during the disturbances proceeding the Police Action in the old Hyderabad State in 1948.
3,000/ from the 11th defendant to enable her to make the purchase and the name of the 11th defendant was included in the sale deed in order to provide security for the amount to advanced by the 11th defendant.
According to the plaintiff she borrowed Rs.
Alagiriswami, J. The plaintiff and the 11th defendant purchased under the sale deed Exhibit P 3 dated 5 6 1941 about 200 acres of land on Jagdeopur village in Biddipet Taluq of Medak District and about 450 acres of land in Gandamalla in Bhongir taluq of Nalgonda District for a sum of Rs.
