The respondent thereafter approached the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad representing to the Tribunal that pursuant to the order of December 27, 1985 she had joined her duties on January 2, 1986 and that she should be allowed to companytinue in service with all the bene fits from that day.
The Tribunal passed the impugned order directing the appellants to allow her to join the duties and to pay to her salary from the date she reported for her duties in companypliance with the order of December 27, 1985.
The Tribunal also awarded companyts against the appellants.
2559 of 1988 From the Judgment and Order dated 31.8.1987 of A.P. Adminis trative Tribunal, Hyderabad in R.P. No.
P. Rao for the Respondent.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
She was, therefore, number allowed to join the service, and was sent back.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SAWANT, J. The admitted facts in the present case are that the respondent applied for Grade I and Grade II teacher posts Post Graduate Teacher and Trained Graduate Teacher posts respectively in September, 1985 pursuant to a news papers advertisement calling for applications for the said posts.
When pursuant to the order, the respondent approached the authorities with the certificates, it was numbericed that the respondent was number qualified for the post.
Admittedly, the qualification prescribed in the advertisement for the said posts was a second class degree in M.A., and the respondent held a third class degree in A. However, it appears that on December 27, 1985, an order was issued wrongly by the first appellant appointing her as a Post Graduate Teacher in Hindi.
The order stated that her appointment was subject to the production of original cer tificates and to the companypliance with the other necessary formalities.
393 i of 1987.
Madhva Reddy and G. Prabhakar for the Appellants.
