Being aggrieved with the said Assessment Order, the Respondent preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals .
1,65,12,077/ and added the same to the income of the Respondent under the Income Tax Act, 1961 in short the IT Act .
Since the moot question of law in all these appeals is akin, hence, vide this companymon judgment, all the appeals would stand disposed of.
Hence, this instant appeal has been filed before this Court by the Revenue.
Vide order dated 19.02.2010, the ITAT allowed the appeal of the Respondent while setting aside the orders passed by Learned CIT Appeals and the Assessing Officer.
216, 398, 403, 404 and 680 of 2011 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in short the Tribunal dated 19.02.2010.
In order to appreciate the companytroversy at hand, it is pertinent to allude to the relevant facts in a summarized way for the proper insightful of the instant case.
Learned CIT Appeals , vide order dated 15.09.2005, upheld the order of the Assessing Officer and dismissed the appeal.
The appellant herein is the Income Tax Department, on the other hand, the Respondent M s Virtual Soft Systems Ltd. is a companypany registered under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956.
Being aggrieved, the Revenue took the matter before the High Court.
This batch of appeals has been filed against the impugned judgment and order dated 07.02.2012 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in ITA Nos.
Being dissatisfied, the Respondent preferred an appeal before the ITAT.
On 29.12.1999, the Respondent filed return of income for the Assessment Year 1999 2000 declaring loss of Rs 70,24,178/ while claiming an amount of Rs 1,65,12,077/ as deduction for lease equalization charges.
On scrutiny, the Assessing Officer, after perusal of the return and hearing the parties, vide Assessment Order dated 28.01.2005 disallowed deduction claimed as the lease equalization charges amounting to Rs.
K.Agrawal, J. SLP C No.
25006 of 2012 Leave granted.
