3.2 Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order passed by the High Court quashing the criminal proceedings initiated by the original companyplainant, the original Complainant has preferred the present Appeal.
3.1 On the chargesheet filed by the Investigating Officer, the companyplaint filed by the Appellantoriginal Complainant was registered as CC No.139 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate CourtIII at Kozhikode for the offences under Sections 406 and 420 read with Section 34 of the IPC.
R. Shah, J. Leave granted.
Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 02.12.2016 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.355 of 2016 by which the High Court has quashed the proceedings of CC 139 of 2015 at JFCMIII at Calicut, the original Complainant has preferred the Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by SUSHIL KUMAR RAKHEJA present Appeal.
Date 2018.12.12 115508 IST Reason That the appellant herein filed a companyplaint against the respondent accused for the offences under Section 420, 406 read with Section 34 of the IPC alleging, inter alia, that after entering into the agreement by the Accused with the Complainant with regard to availing of intellectual services for marketing the products of the companyplainant, the accused did number pay the amount due and payable under the agreement and paid a sum of Rs.1,50,000/ only Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand Only and without paying the remaining amount backed out from the agreement and thereby the accused has companymitted the offence as alleged.
