The Delhi High Court also dismissed the writ petition by order dated 22.3.1991 following its earlier decision dated 14th March, 1991 and 19th March, 1991.
In the order dated 19.3.1991 reliance was placed on its earlier decision dated 14.3.1991 and as regards the argument of promissory estoppel it was held that there was numberdocument on the record filed by the petitioners where any promise was held out to any of the petitioners that the ownership will be transferred to them.
After the aforesaid decision dated 14.3.1991 the Delhi High Court by its order dated 19.3.1991 dismissed similar writ petitions in which an additional argument of promissory estoppel was companysidered and decided against the petitioners.
The allotment of the flats were made to the petitioners in their capacity as employees of DESU and it was an admitted position that the petitioners were paying rent to the respondents.
All the above Special Leave Petitions have been filed against the aforesaid decisions of the High Court dated 14.3.1991, 19.3.1991 and 22.3.1991 and the same are disposed of by one companymon order.
