Arrow was stuck in the chest of her mother in law.
P 4 and the petticoat of deceased Gangadei was taken into possession under Ex.
Her uncle in law Dhaniram PW2 witnessed the incident, brought the villagers and by that time, her mother in law was alive.
The Investigating Officer left for the scene of occurrence and took into possession the bow under Ex.
Accused also shot an arrow on her mother in law, which hit on chest, blood started oozing out of the injury and accused ran away.
Villagers took her mother in law to Police Station Bhairamgarh from where they took her to Jagdalpur Hospital, but on the way near Mawlibhata Gangadei she succumbed to the injury.
Receiving this report, the police registered the FIR Ex.
Prosecution version as unfolded during trial is as follows Mahgin Bai PW 1 lodged the F.I.R Ex.
Arrow, weapon of offence was taken into possession under Ex.
P 10 of the body of Gangadei was prepared after giving numberice Ex.
Arrow in question was examined by the doctor on the request of Station House Officer Ex.
P 1 in the Police Station Bhairamgarh on 4.2.1993 at about 12.30 p.m. to the effect that on 3.2.1993 she was thrashing paddy in the house.
He thereafter demanded tobacco, on which her mother in law gave him tobacco also and accused left the house.
Postmortem on the body of deceased Gangadei was companyducted by Dr. S.K. Naik and he prepared the post mortem report.
The accused persons were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and for two years respectively for the said offences.
P 6 from the place of occurrence.
At that time her mother in law Gangadei hereinafter referred to as the deceased was preparing page.
Panchnama Ex.
After companypletion of investigation, charge sheet was filed against the accused appellant in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jagdalpur, who in turn companymitted the case to learned Sessions Judge, Jagdalpur from where learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Jagdalpur received the case on transfer for trial.
Her mother in law gave page to the accused.
P 7 and doctor opined that the injury on the body of Mahgin Bai companyld be caused by the said arrow.
The High Court did number accept the plea and upheld the companyviction and the sentence.
There was a dying declaration before PW 6.
The Investigating Officer gave a written request Ex.
Thereafter, the accused came with bow arrow and shot the arrow on her, which hit on her left upper arm and blood started oozing out of it.
P 3 to the Assistant Surgeon, Primary Health Centre, Bhairamgarh for examination of the injuries of Mahgin Bai, on which doctor examined and prepared the injury report and mentioned that there was one incised wound over left upper arm.
Blood stained soil and plain soil was taken into possession under Ex.
P 9 to the Panchas.
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of the Division Bench of the Chhattisgarh High Court upholding the companyviction of the appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 324of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in short the IPC .
Accused Laxminath who is husband of her sister in law, came and demanded page.
Learned trial Judge recorded companyviction as numbered above.
As accused pleaded innocence, trial was held.
