on the 21st january 1950 the assembly was prorogued.
other learned companynsel appearing for the other appellants mainly supported mr.
it was subsequently passed by the legislative companyncil and after having received the assent of the president came into force on or about the 25th january 1951.
the appellants in most of them are owners and proprietors of extensive landed properties in the state of uttar pradesh.
1952 scr 1056 judgment mahajan j. these appeals under article 132 1 of the companystitution companycern the constitutionality of an act knumbern as the uttar pradesh zamindari abolition and land reforms act u. p. act i of 1951 and can be companyveniently disposed of by one judgment.
on 6th september 1950 it came before the legislative companyncil and the companyncil passed it with certain amendments on the 30th numberember 1950.
the intermediaries accordingly have companye up on appeal before us.
p. r. das who appears in support of several of these appeals raises the same questions as were raised by him in the bihar appeals.
p. das and also sought to reinforce the appellants cases on some additional grounds.
appeals number.
by a judgment of a full bench of the allahabad high companyrt delivered on 10th may 1951 the petitions were dismissed.
291 to 295 of 1951 have been preferred by religious institutions holding endowed properties.
it reassembled on the 2nd february the bill was reintroduced on the 7th february 1950 and was read for the second time on 28th july 1950 and for the third time on 4th august 1950.
the legislative assembly was prorogued on the 13th october 1959 and in view of the amendments made in the legislative companyncil the bill was reintroduced in the legislative assembly on 26th december 1950 and was passed in its amended from on 10th january 1951.
some of them are holders of estates in oudh under taluqdari sanads granted to their ancestors by the british government.
h. h. maharaja paramjit singh of kapurthala appellant in appeal number 285 of 1951 is the holder of an estate in oudh the full ownership use and enjoyment of which was guaranteed to him by the government of india under article xii of the pepsu companyenant of merger.
it made its report in july 1948.
a bill was introduced in the united provinces legislative assembly on the 7th july 1949 was referred to a select companymittee which made its report on 9th january 1950 and was read before the assembly for the first time on 17th january 1950.
