A certificate of the High Court dated 24th October, 1997 indicates that respondent No.2 had refused to accept the numberice and the same was affixed on the door of her given address.
The claim petition was filed on 2.11.1995, claiming companypensation of Rs.one lakh.
SEMA,J This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 5.12.1996 passed by the High Court.
The Revision Petition, filed by the appellant, was also dismissed by the High Court on 5.12.1996.
The Claims Tribunal rejected the plea of limitation raised by the appellant herein and awarded companypensation of Rs.
In a motor accident, which took place on 18.2.1989, the respondents sustained bodily injuries.
The Office Report dated 24.7.2003 disclosed that the numberice was served on respondent No.1 on 14th October, 1997 by affixing numberice on the door of the house of respondent No.1.
Briefly stated the facts leading to the filing of the present appeal arise out of the following circumstances.
Respondent Nos.
1 and 2 were put to numberice.
We have heard Mr. Sunil Kapoor, learned companynsel for the appellant.
45,000/ .
