No.187 of 2004, dismissing the petition filed by the appellant under Section 125 Cr.
dismissing the same.
P.C. The appellant is the father of the respondent and had filed the aforesaid petition under Section 125 Cr.
Relying on the said decision, the High Court held that the appellant was number entitled to maintain the revision petition before the Family Court at Bijapur, since the respondent was working in the Anjuman College at Syndagi.
P.C. companyld have been filed by the appellant was before the Family Court of the district which was situated at Bijapur.
The said petition was dismissed as indicated hereinabove.
ALTAMAS KABIR, J. Leave granted.
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 12th March, 2008, passed by the Karnataka High Court in Revision Petition FC No.27/2007 Crl.
The said revision petition had been filed against the order passed by the learned Judge, Family Court at Bijapur, on 9th February, 2007, in Crl.
P.C. for payment of monthly maintenance of Rs.5,000/ from the respondent on the ground that having become old and number having any source of income, he was unable to maintain himself, whereas the respondent was an employee of the Anjuman College, Syndagi and was well off.
In the revision filed by the appellant before the High Court, the High Court was of the view that the learned Family Judge had number companymitted any error of law or material irregularity which would warrant interference with the impugned order.
