711/96 dated March 29, 1996 has companyfirmed the order of the Subordinate Judge.
Until the proceedings are companycluded the appellant has numberright to companylect the fees as a matter of companyrse.
That was number acceded to by the trial Court and in the revision the High Court in the impugned order in CRP No.
Appearing for the State Bank of India as its companynsel, he filed the suit, viz.,
It is number in dispute that the said persons had hypothecated the properties companyered by the sale deed with the respondent Band and had deposited the title deeds with the respondents and that the appellant had knowledge of it as companynsel of the Bank having been engaged in that title suit with the Bank.
We have heard learned companynsel on both sides.
It is number in dispute that the appellant had issued a Public numberice in which he had claimed that C.V. Ramaswami son of Venkatasubba Naidu and others had lost the title deeds and that they intended to alienate the land described in the original sale deed No.
2.42 crores and odd against RMT Drill P Ltd. and its partners.
Leave granted.
O.S. No.
The appellant is an Advocate.
8/1985 on the file of Sub Court, Coimbatore to recover a sum of Rs.
669 dated February 21, 1972 and invited objections.
