The appeal was directed to be listed for hearing in the second week of January, 1973.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order date 24th day of February 1972, of the Delhi High Court in Cr.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
It is alleged by the prosecution that the appeal ant had addressed a public meeting of the employees of the Defence Department on October 9,,1968 and in the companyrse of his speech he had incited the said employees to companymit offences prejudicial to the security of the State, or to the maintenance of public order.
The appeal was also directed to be heard on the existing paper book with liberty to the parties to file such additional documents as they wished to file, from the record.
C. Agarwala and A. K. Gupta for the appellant.
Sometime in January, 1973 the appellant presented criminal miscellaneous petition number 32 of 1973 seeking permission to urge additional grounds.
P. Bhandari and R. N. Sachthey, for the respondent.
against him by a Magistrate, First Class, New Delhi on July 3, 1969 under s. 9 of the Punjab Security of State Act Punjab Act number 12 , 1953 hereinafter called the Act be quashed.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DUA, J. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order of a learned single Judge of the High Court, of Delhi dated February 24, 1972 rejecting the appellant revision petition under ss.
The special leave petition originally came up for preliminary hearing before a bench of this, Court on August 18, 1972 when numberice to show cause was issued.
469 of 1970.
Rev. No.
197 of 1972.
In that revision he had prayed, that the charge framed.
It appears that numberwrit petition was filed but on September 26, 1972 this Court granted special leave on usual terms.
430 and 561 A of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
On September 19, 1972 the hearing was again adjourned for a week to enable the petitioners companynsel to file a writ petition.
