Counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent companytending that appellants seniority was companysidered with effect from the date when the vacancy had arisen after the retirement of the 5th respondent.
The 3rd respondent was only a senior stenographer from Govt.
service and was on deputation.
The above action is obviously illegal and an arm twist to nepotism.
When the matter had companye up for.
For the post of Public Relations Officer, he is required to be companysidered for promotion on regular basis.
Instead of promoting him on regular basis, the deputation is was companysidered and promoted.
We have heard learned companynsel on both sides.
The admitted position is that while the respondent NO.5, P.N. Jalla, was on deputation as senior Steno, the appellant was appointed on regular basis as Office Superintendent.
The appellant challenged the said action by way of writ petition which was number properly companysidered be the Division Bench.
Leave granted.
admission, this Court on August 21, 1995 had passed the following order Counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner does number require payment of back wages but his due seniority is to be companysidered according to rules.
While the petitioner is a regular employee and is entitled to be companysidered, when the vacancy of Public Relations Officer had arisen, he was number companysidered, Since he Single Judge has given the direction companyrectly, the Division Bench was number right in upsetting that order from the date on which he was due to be companysidered.
