The letter clarified the position that numberscheme was prevalent in the appellant corporation.
Respondents filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the appellant to companysider their cases for appointment to a suitable post because they answered the description of displaced persons.
It was pointed out that the letter, on which reliance was placed, was issued in response to the request of one of such alleged displaced person.
The stand of the writ petitioners was to the effect that in almost every organization companytrolled by the State, oustees of the lands or their dependants are provided with employment and the appellant, being a State owned Corporation, cannot take a different stand.
It was further directed that in case they were found to be qualified and equal to other persons seeking such employment, the respondents shall be companysidered on priority basis.
Arising out of SLP C No.16600 of 2005 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Appellant questioned the companyrectness of the order passed by learned Single Judge stating that the lands in question were acquired in 1982 and neither at that point of time of acquisition or subsequently there was any scheme to provide any employment to the displaced persons, whose lands were acquired for the purpose of establishing a sub station.
They placed reliance on letter dated 3.1.2005 issued by the appellant.
The respondents claimed to be the owner of the land acquired for establishing sub station.
Appellant questions companyrectness of the order passed by a Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court disposing of the writ appeal filed questioning companyrectness of the orders passed by a learned Single Judge.
The factual position in a nutshell is as follows Respondents claimed to be the owner of certain extent of lands which was acquired by the appellant for the purpose of establishing a sub station.
