Being aggrieved by the said judgment and companyviction by the trial companyrt the respondent herein preferred an appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Rajasthan at Jodhpur.
The attack in question was alleged to be due to the dispute between the respondent herein and deceased Amar Singh as to the right of the deceased to graze his cattle on the land belonging to the respondent.
It is based on the said companyplaint that after investigation the Police of Pahada Police Station filed a chargesheet against the respondent herein for offences punishable under section 302 IPC as also under sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act.
He also found the respondent guilty of offence punishable under section 4 read with 25 of the Arms Act and awarded punishment of 6 months simple imprisonment with a fine of Rs.200 in default to undergo simple imprisonment for 15 days.
SANTOSH HEGDE,J. On 15.7.1989 Magan PW 1 lodged a companyplaint with Police Station Pahada alleging that on the previous day at about 9 p.m. the respondent herein Dhool Singh had caused serious injuries with a sharp edged weapon to Amar Singh son of Shankar Singh in a field known as Pahada which incident according to the companyplaint was numbericed by Ramesh PW 4.
