The admitted facts are that thebuilderimpleaded as one of the respondents, after obtaining the requisite sanction, built 8 floors including ground floor on November 22,1984 as per the guidelines which permitted 150 A.R.with the height restriction of 80 feet.
The demolition came to be challengedby wayof thewrit petition in the High Court.
At a later stage,it was foundthat the builder companystructed the building in violation of the Regulations.
Consequently, the flats of the top four floors were demolished.
Wehave heard learned companynsel on both sides.
Came to be madeand thepossession of the flatswas delivered to the purchasers, the appellant being one of them.
The companystruction ofthe building known as White House.
The High Court dismissedthe same.
Thusthis appeal by special leave.
Leave granted.
