The appellants questioned the said order of dismissal before the High Court of Allahabad in W.P. No.30501 of 2007 which was disposed of by a Division Bench of that Court by an order dated 8.2.2008.
The dismissal order was challenged by the respondent before the Central Administrative Tribunal who quashed the same by its order dated 17.5.2007.
From the submissions number made by Mr. Rakesh K. Khanna, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the appellants and Mr. B.K.The dismissal came as a measure of punishment for proved misconduct on account of the respondent having occupied a parcel of land owned by the Indian Railways with whom the respondent was employed at the relevant point of time.
When the matter was listed on 23.11.2012, learned Additional Solicitor General submitted that the appeal filed by the respondent employee has since been dismissed and the order of eviction passed by the Estate Officer has thereby attained finality as numberfurther proceedings have been taken by the employee and there is numberimpediment for further action to be taken against the respondent employee in accordance with the liberty reserved to the appellants by the Tribunal as also by the High Court.
The dispute in this appeal relates to the validity of an order dated 18.2.1998 of dismissal passed by the appellants against respondent.
NAGAPPAN, J. Leave granted.
