The opinion of Mr. Sablok on the cause of death was In my opinion the cause of death is shock and Syncope due to multiple injuries.
His cries attracted the neighbours and one of them Moda P. W. 8 attempted a rescue but was beaten off.
The incident took place on June 29, 1961, at about 5 or 5 30 a.m. at a village called Hindas.
Special leave was granted to the appellants limited to the question whether Section 302 read with Section 34 was applicable to the facts of the case.
At the site of other injuries muscle tags were protruding out of the wounds.
1 and Roopla appellant No.
He died as a result on the same day.
Bherun tried hard to avoid being dragged inside the house and clung desperately to the door jamb but Anda and Roopla struck him on his hands with their sticks to make him release his hold.
He was on his way to the fields, when he passed the house of Bhagu one of the original accused but since acquitted and was caught hold of by Anda appellant No.
The appellants were charged in the alternative and numberquestion of a new charge arises.
When Bherun was admitted in the hospital he was bleeding profusely from his injuries and the right tibia which was fractured at two places was splintered and the broken ends were protruding.
The prosecution further proved that Bherun had gone to Hindas with a servant to attend to his fields there.
In our opinion, leave was number granted on the latter point which does number present any difficulty at all but on the question whether the companyviction for murder is justifiable.
Prosecution proved satisfactorily that Bherun and his father Girdhari were on inimical terms with the appellants and that certain criminal proceedings were going on between them.
2 and was assaulted.
They and the other accused, dragged him inside the house and beat him severely.
The evidence, proving the presence and participation of these appellants in the assault has been companycurrently accepted by the High Court and the Sessions Judge and the findings on this part of the case must be companysidered as established.
One Bherun son of Girdhari Jat was assaulted by a number of persons and received numerous injuries.
There were as many as sixteen lacerated wounds on the arms and legs and a hematoma on the right forehead and a big bruise on the middle of the chest.
