It was also alleged that on 29th September, 2006, father in law and the mother in law talked to the accused on telephone and in a well planned companyspiracy caused death of the daughter of the informant.
This appeal is directed against the order dated 19th August, 2009 passed by the Jharkhand High Court dismissing the petition filed by the appellant herein praying for quashing of the entire criminal proceedings of Balumath P.S. Case No.
It was stated therein that the Crl.
On receipt of the aforesaid information a case was registered, thereafter the police started investigation.
An order was also passed on 17th April, 2007, by the Magistrate taking companynizance which is also assailed in the present case.
The appellant was granted bail by the High Court on 10th April, 2007.
The High Court companysidered the pleas raised by the parties and thereafter held that the case is a case of dowry death and that the appellant is the husband.
The informant filed a First Information Report that his daughter was married to the appellant herein in the year 2002, as per the Hindu rites and custom and that at the time of her marriage, informant had given sufficient dowry.
After submission of the aforesaid charge sheet and passing of the order taking companynizance, the appellant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying for quashing of the proceeding in the aforesaid manner.
After the companypletion of the investigation, a charge sheet was filed on 14th April, 2001.
It was also held that the points taken by the appellant before the High Court are rather a defence case and that the same relates to factual dispute.
Leave granted.
1735 of 2011 SLP Crl 10005/2009 REPORTABLE informants daughter companyplained about the torture meted out to her by the father in law and the mother in law to her husband, the present appellant who allegedly did number pay any heed.
Appeal No.
445 of 2006 in which companynizance was taken of the offence under Section 304B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code against the appellant and others.
