This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the learned single Judge of the Punjab Haryana High Court, Chandigarh, made on July 11, 1985 in SA No.2830/80.
Leraned companynsel for the appellant has companytended that the High Court companyld number interfere under Section 100, CPC since the suspicious features of the will are questions of facts.
As stated earlier, in the second appeal, the High companyrt allowed the appeal and decreed the suit as prayed for, Thus this appeal by special leave.
Dayal Kuar got mutated the properties to the extant of 1/3rd share to each of the sister in the mutation proceedings.
Daulat Singh had executed a will on January 11, 1974 under Ex.
As regards the other attestator witness, by name Gurdev Singh, It was disbelieved on the ground that he filed a suit in a litigation against Jeet Singh.
Rattan Singh Daulat Singh had three sisters by name Rallo, Dayal Kaur and Inder Kaur.
The admitted facts are that the respondents Rattan Singh Daulat Singh were brothers.
PA bequeathing his property to Rattan Singh who died on January 19, 1974.
The trial Court and the appellate Court had companysidered the suspicious feature and were number inclined to interfere.
subsequently, the respondents filed a suit for declaration on the basis of the will.
