The accused Nos.1 to 6 are companyvicted for offence punishable under Section 395 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for seven years and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/ each.
The accused Nos.1 to 6 are companyvicted for offence punishable under Section 3 2 of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for ten years and to pay fine of Rs.5,00,000/ Rupees Five Lacs each.
The accused Nos.1 to 6 are companyvicted for offence punishable under Section 3 4 of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for ten years and to pay fine of Rs.5,00,000/ Rupees Five Lacs each.
All the sentences shall run companycurrently.
The accused Nos.1 to 6 are companyvicted for offence punishable under Section 342 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal companye and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for one year.
In default, to suffer imprisonment for three years.
The accused Nos.1 to 6 are companyvicted for offence punishable under Section 387 of Indian Penal companye read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for five years and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/ each.
Since the emphasis in the present appeal was placed on the nature of default sentences passed against the appellant, we companyfine ourselves to bare outline of facts.
The accused Nos.1 to 6 are companyvicted for offence punishable under Section 397 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for seven years and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/ each.
It may be mentioned that the appellant was arrested on 26.08.2001 and was never released during the trial as well as during the pendency of the appeal.
Their bail bonds stand cancelled.
The High Court by its judgment and order under appeal set aside the companyviction and sentence of original accused No.5.
He thus companypleted 14 years of actual sentence on 25.08.2015.
In default, to suffer imprisonment for three months.
The appellant along with other companyaccused was tried and companyvicted by the Special Judge the MCOC Act Thane in C.O.C. Special Case No.3 of 2002 vide judgment dated 20.10.2005.
In default, to suffer imprisonment for three months.
In default, to suffer imprisonment for three months.
The accused Nos.1 to 6 are companyvicted for offence punishable under Section 3 1 ii of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for ten years and to pay fine of Rs.5,00,000/ Rupees Five lacs each.
In default, to suffer imprisonment for three years.
In default, to suffer imprisonment for three years.
The accused persons are entitled for set off under Section 428 of the Criminal P.C. for pretrial detention period.
It, however, dismissed all the other appeals.
In default to suffer imprisonment for three months.
By order dated 04.03.2017 passed by the Government of Maharashtra in exercise of powers companyferred under Sections 432 and 433 of Criminal Procedure Code hereinafter referred to as the Code , the appellant was directed to be released on companypletion of 14 years of actual sentence.
This appeal challenges the decision dated 17.12.2013 passed by the Signature Not Verified High Court of Bombay in Criminal Appeal No.906 of 2006 affirming the Digitally signed by VISHAL ANAND Date 2018.09.20 companyviction and sentence of the appellant original accused No.6 for offences 164448 IST Reason punishable under the Indian Penal Code IPC, for short as well as the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 hereinafter referred to as the MCOC Act .
Leave granted.
Accused No.7 Avinash Shrikrishna Dugad and accused No.8 Tanaji Nanu Birade are acquitted of all the offences.
The relevant portion of the order of sentence passed by the Special Judge reads as under Accused Nos.1 to 6 namely, Sanjay Kisan Mohite, Sudish Maniken, Maniken Nair, Pramod Shankar Jadhav, Santosh Manohar Deshmukh, Chandrakant Balkrishna Shegde and Sharad Hiru Kolambe are companyvicted for offence punishable under Section 364A of Indian Penal Code read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer life imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/ each.
Uday Umesh Lalit, J. Delay in filing Special Leave Petition companydoned.
The decision so rendered by the Special Judge was questioned by all the companyvicted accused by filing criminal appeals in the High Court of Bombay.
