226 of 2001.
4083 of 2005 whereby the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants herein against the order dated 24.08.2005 of the Additional District Judge, Karnal in Civil Appeal No.
The respondent filed a suit bearing Civil Suit No.
In order to appreciate the issues involved in the appeal, which lie in a narrow companypass, few facts need mention infra.
The suit was for a declaration that they are the owner of the suit land and that the appellant State have numberright, title and interest in the suit land.
The dispute thus essentially centered around to the ownership of the suit land as to who is the owner of the suit land, viz.,
the appellants or the respondent.
The appellants, felt aggrieved, filed first appeal being Civil Appeal No.The appellants then asserted their ownership rights over the suit land to the exclusion of every one.
The respondent based their claim of ownership on several documents which, according to them, exclusively proved their superior title over every one including the State.
Both parties adduced oral and documentary evidence to prove their title over the suit land.
The respondent also claimed prohibitory injunction against the appellants restraining the State authorities from interfering in their peaceful possession over the suit land.
The Trial Court, on the basis of pleadings, framed issues.
The Trial Court by judgment decree dated 11.06.2002 decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff.
Accordingly, injunction, as claimed by the respondent against the appellants, was also granted.
226 of 2001 against the appellants in the Court of Civil Judge Jr. Division , Karnal.
The dispute in the suit relates to the land measuring 36 kanals 15 Marlas companyprised in Khewat No.
The respondent Gram Panchayat of village Kalehri is the plaintiff.
536 min, Khasra No 59 Gair Mumkin Nala situated in village Kalehri, Tahsil Gharaunda, District Karnal hereinafter referred to as the suit land .
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 18.11.2005 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in R.S.A. No.
361 min/350m, Khatoni No.
The appellant the State of Haryana is the defendant.
The appellants filed their written statement and denied the respondents claim of the ownership.
On appreciating the evidence adduced by the parties, it was held that the respondent plaintiff is the owner of the suit land.
30 of 2005 affirming the judgment decree dated 11.06.2002 of the Civil Judge Jr. Division , Karnal in Civil Suit No.
