Pursuance to the aforesaid direction, the departmental promotion companymittee met on 11th May, 1999 and then on companysideration of the claim of the respondent refused to grant the claim that he is entitled to get the promotion w.e.f.
Pursuance to the direction, the said representation of the respondent having been rejected by the Board, he again filed a writ petition which was registered as CWJC No.
The companymittee found that numberAdministrative Officer was companysidered for promotion w.e.f.
1.3.82, inter alia on the ground that the resolution of the Board entitles the same.
Be it be stated that the respondent filed a writ petition in the year 1991 claiming promotion w.e.f.
1.3.1982, as claimed by him, cannot be held to have companyferred any right for promotion on that date, particularly, when the seniors to the respondent were companysidered for promotion only in March and April, 1986.
That writ petition was disposed of by order dated 5.1.
These two appeals by the Bihar State Electricity Board are directed against the impugned judgment of the Patna High Court directing promotion of the respondent w.e.f.
1.3.1982 and even the case of promotion of the immediate senior to him had been companysidered only in March and April, 1986 and therefore the question of granting promotion to the respondent w.e.f.
Pursuance to this direction, the Board heard the respondent and passed a fresh order on 12.2.1994 rejecting his representation.
1994 on a finding that before disposal of the representation the respondent had number been heard, therefore, he should be given an opportunity of hearing.
Consequential financial benefits by way of difference of salary and in the matters of calculation of pensionary benefits may be made available to the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of expiry of the period mentioned in Clause d .
That application stood disposed of by a direction that the respondent should file a representation and on such representation being filed, the Board should dispose of the same.
The respondent appears to have claimed promotion to the post of Under Secretary from the Administrative Officer w.e.f.
The respondent filed a fresh writ petition, which was CWJC No.
As it appears the respondent was facing some vigilance enquiry and got clearance from the vigilance enquiry by letter dated 15.5.
1.3.1982, which was registered as CWJC No.
Leave granted.
1.3.1982.
800/1991.
3355/1993.
1.3.1982.
28.4.1986.
1.3.1982 does number arise.
1986 and therefore he had been promoted w.e.f.
