Shri P.P. Rao, learned senior companynsel appearing for the appellant has submitted that a direction to regularise the part time employees itself is companytrary to law and the said direction companyld number have been issued.
As the respondents and others had been working for more than 10 years, they filed Writ Petition Nos.
Hence, these appeals.
The said Writ Petitions were allowed by the companymon judgment and order dated 23.7.2012 with the direction to regularise the services of the respondents on full time basis based on the individual representation after verifying their service particulars from the date of companypletion of 10 years of service with time scale of pay.
17468, 17470, 17472, 17473, 17469 and 17471 of 2012 before the High Court of Madras for seeking regularisation of their services.
Aggrieved, the appellant preferred the writ appeals which were dismissed.
Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J. These appeals have been preferred against the impugned judgments and orders dated 21.11.2012 and 16.11.2012 in Writ Appeal Nos.
2402, 2403 2404, 2405 of 2012 and 2555, 2556 of 2012 passed by the High Court of Madras, by which the High Court has regularised the services of part time sweepers respondents herein .
Facts and circumstances giving rise to these appeals are that The respondents had been appointed as part time sweepers by appellant from 1987 till 1993 as their initial appointments had been issued to the respondents and others on 1.12.1987, 2.5.1991, 1.4.1993, 10.4.1993, 27.5.1999 and 19.1.2001.
