1011 The Tribunal sustaining the objection rejected the approval applications on that score alone and number on merits.
remand to the Tribunal was made for decision on merits.
From the Judgment and Order dated 12.7.91 of the Bombay High Court ill Appeal Nos.
It is companymon ground that the payment otherwise was proper but since it was short by 10 or 15 rupees, as respectively due on account of taxable under the Tax Act, the payment was termed as invalid.
and though initially number part of the defence taken in the written statement defence was later set up by them that they had number been paid wages in terms of the mandatory provisions of section 33 2 b of the Act, as there was short payment.
In separate writ petitions by the respondents, the Bombay High Court interfered in the matter taking the view that the Tribunal was in error in refusing approval on the around of the suggested short payment and hence breach of section 33 2 b of the Act.
Letters Patent Appeals preferred by the respective appellants were dismissed by a division bench of the Bombay High Court affirming the view of the learned Single Judge.
The matter companyld number be finalised by the learned Single Judge and.
3134 36 of 1993.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.
1309, 1309 and 1311 of 1997.
It is companymon ground that the respondent Air India, statutorily bound, Applied to the National Industrial Tribunal.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by PUNCHHI, J. leave to appeal granted.
Ms. Chandan Ramamurthi and M.A. Krishna Moorthy for the Appellants.
K. Ramamurthy.
S. Nariman, Arun Jaitly, Lalit Bhasin, J.K. Das, Viplay Sharma and vineet Kumar for the Respondents.
They individually suffered disciplinary proceedings on the charges of some mis conducts and ha in,, been found guilty were awarded penalties of removal or dismissal by the Air India, as, due to each.
This put the respondent management to Alert and it laid before the Tribunal account which, had gone on to work out the months wages.
The approval sought by the respondent management was opposed by the appellants before the Tribunal.
The three appellants herein, in the period 1979 80 were in the employment of the respondent Air India, and stationed at Calcutta.
