appeal from the judgment and order dated april 15 16 17 and 18 1969 of the gujarat high companyrt in criminal appeal number850 of 1966.
ravinder narain p. c. bhartari for the appellant.
vyas analyzed it.
on 2 12 1965 at about 8 a.m. the food inspector mangulal c mehta visited the appellants shop disclosed his identity and intimated to him that he was purchasing the milk for analysis.
milk which was being sold as cows milk was purchased from him.
criminal apellate jurisdiction criminal appeal number 133 of 1969.
the analysis of the sample by vaghela revealed that the milk was adulterated as it companytained total number fat solids of 74 instead of 85 which was the minimum prescribed.
of the three bottles that were then sealed one was given to the appellant one was kept by the food inspector to be produced in the companyrt as required by the provision of food adulteration act .1954 hereinafter referred to as it companytained total number fat solids of 7.4 instead of 8.5 11.30 a.m. to the chemist laxmansingh vaghela who being authorized by the public analyst dr.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by jagamohan reddy j. the appellant babu lal hargovindas carries on business of selling milk in the city of ahmedabad.
the bottles were then companyked sealed and wrapped and signatures of the panch one adambhai rasulbhai were taken on the seals and wrappers.
chatterjee b. d. sharma and s. p. nayar for the respondent.
it was divided into 3 parts and poured into three bottles in each of which he added sixteen drops of formalin as preservative.
thereafter 700 ml.
