Appellants are, thus, before us.
4274 M B of 2006.
2,3 and 4 to get recovery of amount due against the members of Petitioners society through due process of law other than recovery the same as arrears of land revenue It appears some other writ petitions were also filed by the appellant, as would appear from the companynter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents.
Several writ petitions were filed by it questioning the legality thereof.
A loan of Rs.
22,00,000/ under the Consortium Bank Credit Scheme for establishing an unit for manufacturing P.V.C. Shoe Sole.
4,5 and 6 issued by U.P. Khadi and Gramodyog Board, Lucknow.
2 herein was also a party praying for the following reliefs i to hold the provisions of Section 35A of the P. Khadi Village Industries Board Act, 1960to be unconstitutional and declaring the same ultra vires the provisions of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India ii issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the recovery certificates dated 14.9.05, 19.7.05 and 10.9.2002 companytained in Annexures Nos.
However, fresh recovery proceeding had been initiated which were number the subject matter of challenge in the writ petitions filed by the Appellant before the High Court.
A Sum of Rs.
A sum of Rs.
Again, a sum of Rs.
5,24,000/ was sanctioned in the year 1991.
It filed an application for grant of loan of Rs.
filing of four writ petitions on the same cause of action and, thus, it was number maintainable.
5637 OF 2007 Arising out of SLP Civil No.
The Samiti allegedly defaulted in making payments.
13,20,000/ was released.
Basic fact of the matter is number in dispute.
90,000/ was sanctioned in 1996.
CIVIL APPEAL NO.
iii issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus companymanding the opposite party Nos.
3,09,000/ was released by the respondents.
A purported public interest litigation was also filed wherein Suresh Chandra Sharma Appellant No.
Recovery proceedings were initiated against the Samiti.
3265 of 2007 B. SINHA, J Leave granted.
It applied for loan for establishment of an industry for manufacturing Aluminum Pottery from the respondents.
Extent of Superior Courts jurisdiction to dismiss a writ petition for alleged suppression of material fact is involved in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 19.07.2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow in WP No.
Appellant is a companyperative society Samiti .
A fresh writ petition was filed.
16,20,000/ was sanctioned and Rs.
