it is the said order of the tribunal which has been impugned by the appellant in this appeal by special leave.
the chief executive officer of mangalore taluk development board respondent 1 issued a memo dated numberember 4 1986 to the appellant stating therein that his service as secretary of the bajpe panchayat had stood terminated.
but by its order dated september 20 1988 the tribunal rejected the application on the ground that it had no jurisdiction to decide upon the matter.
the appellant challenged the said termination of his service as secretary of the bajpe panchayat by an application made before the karnataka administrative tribunal the tribunal established under the provisions of the administrative tribunals act 1985 the tribunals act.
1995 3 scr 932 the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by venkatachala j. r.n.a.
however the appellant made an application before the tribunal seeking review of its earlier order.
that review application of the appellant was also rejected by the tribunal by its order dated january 22 1992 reiterating its earlier view that it had numberjurisdiction to decide on the matter of termination of the appellants service as secretary of a panchayat in that he was number in the civil service of the state or in a civil post under the state which would have given it the jurisdiction to decide upon the matter under clause b of sub section 1 of section 15 of the tribunals act.
britto the appellant had been appointed as the secretary of the bajpe panchayat established under the provisions of the karnataka village and local boards act 1959 the act.
