The disciplinary authority, while accepting the finding of the Enquiry Officer to the extent that some charges were proved and some of the charges were number proved, however, did number agree with the report of the Enquiry officer as regards the finding that the charges were partly proved.
This appeal is directed against the order dated 11th March, 1999 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court affirming the order passed by the learned Single Judge.
The Enquiry Officer, after companyducting enquiry, submitted a report holding that some of the charges were proved, some of the charges were partly proved and some of the charges were number proved.
Thereafter, he filed a writ petition before the High Court challenging the order of dismissal from service.
Accepting the said recommendation, the companypetent authority passed an order of dismissal from service.
In that view, on companysideration of the material, the disciplinary authority recommended for dismissal of the respondent from service.
On the allegations of certain misconduct and irregularities, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him by the appellants.
2003 1 SCR 391 The following Order of the Court was delivered.
The respondent unsuccessfully appealed against the order of dismissal to the authorities.
Several charges were framed against him.
The disciplinary authority held that those were fully proved.
The appellants took the matter in appeal before the Division Bench of the same High Court.
Hence this appeal.
The respondent herein was working as a Manager, Grade I in the appellant Bank.
