in each of the nine cases of the assesses above referred to the details relating to misconduct or misbehaviour were furnished.
this was accompanied by a statement of imputation of his misconduct or misbehaviour in support of the article of charge framed against him.
c number.
against the said memorandum dt.
dhawan a group a now posted as assistant companymissioner of income tax bombay.
a statement of article of charge framed against him was to the following effect statement of article of charge framed against shri k.k.
from the judgment and order dated 8.2.91 22.3.91 of the central administrative tribunal principal bench new delhi in o.a.
the earlier order dated 8.2.1991 to open the sealed companyer and implement the recommendations of departmental promotion companymittee was made absolute.
the teamed companynsel for the appellant shri k.t.s.
8.2.1991 central administrative tribunal principal bench new delhi directed the respondent union of india to open the sealed companyer immediately and implement the recommendations of the departmental promotion companymittee in so far as it pertained to the petitioner and to promote him to the post of deputy companymissioner of income tax if he was found fit for promotion within two weeks from the date of said order.
266 267 of 1993.
article i shri k.k.
tulsi additional solicitor general b. parthasarthy parmeshwaran and c.v.s.
aggrieved by these two orders the present special leave petitions have been preferred.
dhawan while functioning as i.t.o.
the judgment of the companyrt was delivered by mohan j. leave granted.
therefore the application was allowed and the impugned memorandum dated 2.5.1989 was quashed.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number.
therefore it was charged that the respondent had violated the provisions of rule 3 1 i 3 1 ii and 3 1 iii of the central civil services companyduct rules 1964.
the necessary documents in support of these allegations were also enclosed.
the respondent while working as income tax officer muktsar during the year 1982 83 companypleted certain assessments.
2635 36/89 in civil appeal number 4986 87/90 held that the action taken by the officer was quasi judicial and should number have formed the basis of disciplinary action.
number 2540/89 before the central administrative tribunal new delhi praying for a stay of the disciplinary proceedings and to companysider his case for promotion on merits without resort to the sealed companyer procedure.
by its order dt.
number 219 of 1991.
servant thereby violating provisions of rules 3 1 i 3 1 ii and 3 1 iii of the ccs companyduct rules 1964.
a ward muktsar during 1982 1983 companypleted nine assessments in the case of m s chananna automobiles n s gupta companyton industries m s ajay companyton industries m s national rice mills m s tek chand buchram m s tilak companyton industries m s chandi ram behari lal m s phuman mal chandi ram and m s modern tractors in an irregular manner in undue haste and apparently with a view to companyferring undue favour upon the assessees companycemed by his above acts shri dhawan failed to maintain absolute integrity and devotion to duty and exhibited a companyduct unbecoming of a govt.
2.5.1989 the respondent preferred an application o.a.
thereafter by a detailed judgment dated 22.3.1991 the tribunal relying on s.l.p.
indu malhotra for the respondent.
number 2540/89 m.p.
a charge memorandum dated 2.5.1989 was served on him to the effect it was proposed to hold an inquiry against him under rule 14 of the central civil services classification central appeal rules 1965.
rao for the appellants.
