Min Rameshwar Singh, No.
Thus by giving seniority to you, you have become much senior even from those who were earlier senior to you.
It is the case of the petitioner that he has been promoted as an Assistant Sub Inspector with effect from February 25, 1970.
1677 of 1988.
They made representations companyplaining of injustice done to them.
20.10.73 by alloting him range No.
That adverse remarks were later expunged and he was companyfirmed in 1969.
His companyfirmation as Head Constable was delayed on account of certain adverse remarks against him.
1 May 1980 and companyfirmed as such w.e.f.
This has delayed his promotion as Sub Inspector SI .
1 February 1966 with all companysequential benefits.
18 February 1988 and further promoted as Officiating Inspector Min w.e.f.
Sd Arun Bhagat Addl.
This is number disputed by the respondents.
21 December 1966 and thereafter upto 18 February 1970.
Further he was admitted to promotion list F Min w.e.f.
The Tribunal has dismissed the appeal.
19 April 1988.
He is companyfirmed as S.I. Min w.e.f.
Commissioner of Police Admn.
With this and other companyclusion, the Tribunal expressed the view that there was numberillegality in the reversion of the appellant and it was companyrective action justified under the circumstances.
D/338.
14.10.1985.
The appellant was companyfirmed as directed w.e.f.
5.12.1985.
802/D and below the name of ASI Rameshwar Singh, No.
7837/CB III, dated 15.3.88.
His promotion to the cadre of HCs, ASIs and SIs was unjustified.
5 July 1983.
The High Court by judgment dated 25 September 1984 allowed the writ petition and directed the respondents to companyfirm the appellant w.e.f.
117/D. His name will exist above the name of ASI Bhagat Ram, No.
The order of the Tribunal has been assailed in this appeal.
D/338 was brought on list D, E and F Min erroneously resulting that he has become senior to his seniors viz.
Complaining about the belated companyfirmation and seeking further promotion, he filed a writ petition in Delhi High Court.
He has also produced another list showing the particulars of ASIs Min whose names were brought on list E promotional list for promotion to the rank of SIs drawn on 21 July 1978 and thereafter upto 14 August 1985.
Challenging the aforesaid order, the appellant preferred an appeal to the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Delhi.
Again he was promoted as SI Min w.e.f.
Upon re examination of cases of the appellant and his seniors in the light of the judgment of the High Court and the relevant rules of promotion, companynsel has produced before us the list showing the particulars of all those Head Constables whose name were brought in list D Promotional list for promotion to the rank of ASI w.e.f.
117/D is admitted to promotion list E Min w.e.f.
The appellant replied to the show cause numberice but companyld number carry companyviction.
On this aspect of the matter we asked Mr. Dutta, learned Additional Solicitor General to have the matter re examined by the respondents.
Delhi No.
D/80 and below the name of S.I. Min Jagdish Singh, No.
24 July 1967 instead of 25 February 1970.
The Additional Commissioner of Police Admn after companysidering the reply made an order dated 25 October 1988 in the following terms After going through the relevant record available on file, I find that the name of Inspector Min Bal Kishan, No.
6.12.87 by alloting him range No.
23 A above the name of S.I. Min Khazan Singh, No.
Orders regarding admission of his name to promotion list F M w.e.f.
42034 50/CB I, dated Delhi, the 25.10.1988.
11834/CB I, dated 20.4.88, are cancelled.
His name will exist at SI.
D/1347 in this Headquarters numberification No.
1.2.1966 and also promoted as ASI Min w.e.f.
On 1 February 1964, he was promoted to officiate as Head Constable.
Commissioner of Police Admn.
Jagannatha Shetty, J. This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 11 November 1988 in O.A. No.
He is promoted to officiate as S.I. Min w.e.f.
800/D. The name of ASI M Bal Kishan No.
The event leading to the appeal are these On 20 February 1958, Bal Kishan, the appellant, was enrolled as a Constable in Delhi Police.
