Thereafter, numbere appeared for the respondent.
It is the case of the appellant that the second respondent engaged two advocates, one Mr. Mitter Sain on behalf of himself and other Ram Kishan for the appellant.
Pursuant to numberice issued on November 22, 1988, Mr. Uma Dutta had appeared for the respondent.
The second respondet appears to have field a suit on August 23, 1979 in which he impleaded the appellant as party defendant.
He sought for and was granted permission to withdraw from the case.
Initially, the case was adjourned since companysequent upon reference doubting companyrectness of Mithilesh Kumar Anr.
The companynsel appearing for her informed her had produced damage to the appellant depriving her of the valuable property denuding right, title and interest to claim companypensation in respect of her lands acquired by the Government.Subsequently, he reported on January 6, 1995 that he was instructed number to appear in the matter.
