He was number selected for the vacancies in September 1968 and February 1969, but was selected for one of the vacancies in September 1969.
From the Judgment and Order dated 18.3.1987 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad in Registration A. No.
However, he was selected for one of the vacancies in September 1969 and was given deemed promotion with reference to that date.
v. Union of India Ors.,
So also the case of respondent Shri Sinha was companysidered for the vacancies in September 1968, February 1969 and September 1969.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
1975 1 SCR 104 and Union of India etc.
As a result, their seniority as Assistant Commissioners was adversely affected and it required companyrection.
There it is pointed out specifically with reference to the companytesting respondents Dr. Tripathi and Shri Sinha that the Committee which met from 1977 to 1979 to adjust the promotions as directed by this Court, companysidered in 1978 the case of Dr. Tripathi with respect to his claim which arose in September 1968, February 1969 and September 1969.
Harish N. Salve, B.S. Chauhan, Sushil Kumar Jain, Ms. Gitanjali Mohan and B.P. Singh for the Respondents.
2675 of 1987.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SAWANT, J. Respondents 1 and 2 in this Appeal Dr. Tripa thi and Shri Sinha hereinafter referred to as the respond ents were recruited directly to the posts of Income Tax Officers, Class I. They had made a grievance before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad that they were number appointed to the next higher post of Assistant Commis sioner, Income Tax according to their turn in the seniority list prepared as per the directions given by this Court in the cases of Bishan Sarup Gupta etc.
He was number selected to the post for the vacancies in September 1968 and February 1969 on the basis of companyparative merit.
Subba Rao and C.V. Rao for the Appellants.
999 of 1986.
