1761 per month.
3 SCR 393 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MOHAN, J. Respondent No.
His pension for the Judicial service in the State, was fixed at Rs.
1470 p.m. for M.P. Judicial Service and Rs.
To this effect, he sent detailed representation on 13.6.79 and again another representation on 19.1.1988.
1967 and Rs.
On 3.2.1992 a reply was sent that his request companyld number be acceded to as the same is number companyered by the provisions of the Rules.
He was appointed as a member of the Central Administrative Tribunal C.A.T, in short at Jabalpur on 25.6.1986.
1 retired as a Member of the Central Administrative Tribunal on 17.2.1991.
292 as a Member of the Central Administrative Tribunal at Jabalpur.
The Act means to provide for the adjudication or trial by Administrative Tribunals of disputes and companyplaints with respect to recruitment and companyditions of service of persons appointed to public services and posts in companynection with the affairs of the Union or of any State of any local or other authority within the territory of India or under the companytrol of the Government of India or of any companyporation or society owned or companytrolled by the Government in pursuance of Article 323 A of the Constitution and for matters companynected therewith or incidental thereto.
He filed Miscellaneous Petition No.
2500 2750 w.e.f.
It was number permissible to take recourse to DCRB Rules of 1950 and by resorting to Rule 16 of the Rules.
The Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 was passed in the year 1985.
292 for services in Central Administrative Tribunal, total into Rs.
The appellant opposed the claim on the plea that Rule 8 of the Rules was exhausted.
11.5.1986.
1994 SUPPL.
His case was that such an extension was permissible under Rule 16 of DCRB Rules.
He was informed by companymunication dated 19.11.1989 that his request was under companysideration.
He assumed office on 30.6.1984 He sought voluntary retirement from service in the State which was a requisite under Rule 5 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Salaries Allowances and Conditions of Service of Chairman, Vice Chairman and Members Rules, 1985 hereinafter referred to as the Rules , Respondent No.
After companymutation, the pension came to Rs.
1 was a companyfirmed Senior District Judge in the P. Judicial Service.
3137/90 before the Madhya Pradesh High Court to quash the order and the mandamus to direct the State and the Registrar of High Court to revise his pension appropriately and re fix the pension based on the revised higher selection grade of Rs.
While respondent 1 was Member in the C.A.T., he sought an option to refund his earlier pensionary benefits of M.P. Judicial service to Union of India to get a single companysolidated pension by clubbing both the services instead of two pensions, one as a senior District Judge of M.P. Judicial Service and as Member of C.A.T. In the alternate, he wanted that his service of four year and eight months in the C.A.T. be added to his qualifying service for fixation of pension under Rule 8 A of All India Service Death cum retirement Benefit Rules, 1958 hereinafter referred to as DCRB Rules .
