Name of Sexer Place of Place where the p appointment farm where the wo sic Chick Sexer will undertaken Shri Joga Singh Malerkotla Malerkotla Patiala Shri Gobind Singh Gurdaspur Gurdaspur Jalandhar Shri Jaswant Singh Patiala Kot Kapura the appellant herein It is clarified here that on the day of chick sexing numberchick sexer should be given any leave.
The Associations case was based on a numberification issued by the State Government in 1992 laying down rules inter alia prescribing the method of recruitment and qualifications for the different posts under the Punjab Animal Husbandry Non Ministerial Class III Service.
The Rules, which were called the Punjab Animal Husbandry Non Ministerial Class III Service Rules, 1992, provided that the post of chick sexer would be filled 50 by direct recruitment and 50 by promotion.
The suit ultimately culminated in an order passed by the High Court in Second Appeal by which the High Court directed that since Gobind Singh had been discharging the duties of a chick sexer, he was entitled to get the pay and allowances of that post.
As far as the appellant was companycerned, in purported companypliance with the direction of the Additional District Judge and the decision of the High Court in Gobind Singhs case, an order was passed on 22nd August 1996 promoting the appellant as chick sexer with effect from 17.10.94.
For example, one order dated 3.7.86 from the Deputy Director, Animal Husbandary Poultry Development to the Assistant Director states Regarding the aforesaid subject, the duty of chick sexer for the work of Hatchery is as under No.
The association claimed that the appellant was a Class IV staff member and was number qualified number eligible to be promoted to the post of chick sexer which was a class III post.
This order was challenged under Article 226 by the Punjab Poultry Field Staff Association the respondent No.1 herein which claimed to represent the interest of one Kuldip Inder Singh, Poultry Assistant.
In 1983, the appellant successfully underwent training as a chick sexer with the Central Hatchery, Chengannur, Kerala.
RUMA PAL, J This appeal has been preferred from the decision of the High Court setting aside the appointment of the appellant as a chick sexer in the Department of Animal Husbandary of the Government of Punjab.
The order of the Additional District Judge accordingly was .the department is ordered to companysider the fact as to whether the plaintiff was working as chick sexer and if so his request for other benefits may also be companysidered according to Law.
After companypleting his training, he discharged the duties of a chick sexer and was appointed as chick sexer at various places within the State.
The appellant filed a suit in 1989 against the State Government Authorities claiming to be paid the same scale of pay as chick sexers.
The State Authorities did number challenge this decision and appointed Gobind Singh as a chick sexer.
The only relief asked for by the appellant before the Appellate Court was that the Department might be directed to companysider i whether the appellant had been working as a chick sexer ii and was entitled to pay and other benefits.
The suit was dismissed in 1993.
In case chick sexer has to take leave under companypelling circumstances they should be appointed.
Punjabi upto Matric standard.
Punjabi upto Matric Standard.
The State Authorities had numberobjection to such an order being passed.
The appellants case is that he was appointed as a Bird Attendant Hatchery Man in the Department on 24th November, 1981.
According to the appellant, he fulfilled these numberms and was entitled to be promoted to the post of chick sexer.
In the meanwhile, one Gobind Singh whose case was substantially similar to the appellants case also filed a suit.
As far as promotion was companycerned, the feeder cadres were Poultry Assistants, Field Assistants, Poultry Store Keepers and Poultry Farm Assistants.
Two years experience in Chick Sexing.
Five years experience in any Government Poultry Farm.
Training Institute at Chandigarh.
The appellant preferred an appeal.
