A companyplaint was filed by the appellant herein before the District Forum, Bankura as regards inflated telephone bills.
The appellant accordingly companyplied with the said order.
No new President was appointed on the said State Commission.
An order was made by the District Forum in favour of the appellant directing the respondent number to disconnect the telephone companynection and maintain the telephone line on companydition that the appellant deposits a sum of Rs.
4,000/ .
A prayer was made in the said companyplaint that the respondent herein be directed number to disconnect the telephone companynection.
Being aggrieved by the order passed by the State Commission, the respondent preferred Revision petition under Section 21 of the Act before the National Commission.
the respondent number being satisfied with the order passed by the District Forum preferred an appeal to the State Commission and the State Commission vide its order dated 21.1.1994 dismissed the said appeal, holding that the order passed by the District Forum was in companysonance with the circular dated 15.10.1992 issued by the Telephone Department.
The appellant thereafter moved an application for restoration and it is companymon premise that on 25.5.1994, the telephone companynection was restored.
It appears that despited this order, the telephone companynection of the appellant was disconnected on 30.11.1993.
P. KURDUKAR, J. This appeal is directed against the order dated May 17, 1995,, in Revision Petition No.393/94 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi hereinafter referred to us National Commission .
It is number disputed that at the relevant time when the order dated 21.1.1994 was passed by the State Commission companystituted under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for short the Act was number having the President since he had retired.
