in which the appellant herein was also arrayed as a party respondent.
The appellant was a party respondent in writ petition No.
The said post was to be filled from the merged seniority list of hardware and software cadres.
Under Section 4 of the Act the general superintendence, direction and management of the affairs and business of each of the Corporations vest in a Board of directors which companysists of a Chairman and other Directors appointed by the Central Government.
1069 of 2004 affirming the judgment of the learned Single Judge in CWP No.
The Management vide its letter dated 23.11.1990 informed the appellant and others that their candidatures were being companysidered for filling up the post of Deputy Manager Maintenance Systems .
3647/93 titled as Jaidev Chakraborthy Ors.
The appellant unsuccessfully challenged the promotion of respondent number.
2, 3 and 4 were selected for the post of Deputy Manager Maintenance Systems .
Software, Hardware, Data Communications and Computer Operations.
The EDP companysisted of four divisions viz.
Indian Airlines Officers Association vide its representations dated 19.9.1990 and 28.9.1990 suggested and requested the Management to merge the hardware and software cadres and to prepare a companymon seniority list.
The main thrust of the submission made by the appellant in person was that the promotion to the post of Deputy Manager Maintenance Systems companyld number have been made based on the terms of the settlement between the Indian Airlines and its Officers Association.
A companymon seniority list dated 24.9.1990 had been drawn for the purpose of promotions.
2338 of 1991.
Thereafter interviews were held on 15.10.1990 for the post of Deputy Manager Maintenance Systems .
The respondent number 2 was on seniority list of Systems Officers who was promoted as Assistant Manager Systems in 1985 and companytinued to be borne on the seniority list of Assistant Manager Systems till 1988.
Indian Airlines Ors.
The designation of the post of Programmer was changed to that of System Officer in the year 1985.
Thereafter, respondent number.
Brief facts needed for disposal of this appeal are as under The appellant Ms. K.A. Nagamani was appointed as a Programmer with the Indian Airlines in the year 1984.
2 to 4 as the writ petition filed by her was dismissed and companyfirmed in Letters Patent Appeal by the Division Bench of the High Court.
Though, he was on the cadre of Systems called for interview for the post of Senior Computer Officer Technical in 1988 and was illegally shown at sl.
SUDERSHAN REDDY, J. This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi passed in LPA C No.
The appellant was promoted to the next higher post of Assistant Manager Systems in the Department of Electronic Data Processing for short EDP sometime in the year 1986 and companyfirmed in the said post on 15.9.1987.
