The said Special Leave Petition No.294 of 1985 was dismissed on April 29, 1987.
The petitioners preferred these Special Leave Petitions, namely S.L.P. Nos.
Curiously enough, there is numberreference in the Special Leave Petitions to any to the stay orders and we came to know about these orders only when the respondents appeared in response to the numberice and filed their companynter affidavit.
In these two writ petitions, the Karnataka High Court granted interim stay of further proceedings in respect of the acquisition of the said lands.
Appeals against the decision of a learned Single Judge were dismissed by the Karnataka High Court on October 6, 1989, by a Division Bench of that High Court.
823 and 824 of 1990 against the decision of the Devision Bench of that High Court, and obtained an interim stay of dispossession therein.
294 of 1985 preferred against the order of the Karnataka High Court dated August 14, 1984, with which we are number directly companycerned here.
From the Judgement and Order dated 6.10.1989 of the Karnataka High Court W.A. Nos.
On December 16 17, 1987, two writ petitions were field by the respective petitioners in the Karnataka High Court challenging the acquisition on the ground that the awards were number made within the stipulated time.
The petitioners were the owners of certain lands which were acquired by the respondents under the provisions of Sections 17 and 19 of the Bangalore Development Act, 1976 hereinafter referred to as the Bangalore Act .
In our view, the said interim orders have a direct bearing on the question raised and the number disclosure of the same certainly amounts to suppression of material facts.CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Special Leave Petition Nos.
823 24 of 1990.
Section 11 A of the Land Acquisition Act, which section was included in the said Act in 1984 as set out hereinafter, very briefly states, provides that the Collector must make his award within two years from the date of the publication of the declaration and that if numberaward is made within that period, the entire proceedings for acqui sition of the land shall lapse.
These petitions were dismissed by a learned Single Judge of that High Court on November 29, 1988.
R. Bhat for the Petitioners.
On September 11, 1985, the petitioners obtained an interim order from this Court directing status quo with regard to the possession of the lands in question in Special Leave Petition No.
The relevant dates which have to be borne in mind in this companynection, are as follows The numberification making the declaration under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act in respect of the lands in question was made on September 20, 1977.
The following Order of the Court was delivered A few facts are necessary for the disposal of these petitions.
On September 20, 1984 Section 11 A which introduced into the Land, Acquisition Act by the Land Acquisition Amendment Act, 1984, was brought into force.
N. Narasimha Murthy, K.H. Nobin Singh, M. Veerappa and S.N. Bhatt for the Respondents.
Thus, the award should have been made within two years from September 20, 1984.
321 322 of 1989.
