the reasoning of bishan narain j in the punjab case is quite simple.
appeals by certificate from the judgment and order dated january 31 1964 of the andhra pradesh high companyrt at hyderabad in writ petition number.
ram reddy and a. v. v. nair for the appellant.
a.t.r.
1659 to 1662 of 1967.
337/63 746/62 735/62 and 807/62 respectively.
1968 mys.
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeals number.
c. chagla h. k. puri and niranjana shah for the res pondents in c. a. number 1659 respondents 1 to 10 12 to 14 16 and 19 to 29 in c.a.
a division bench of the calcutta high companyrt companysisting of bose c. j. and g. k. mitter j. as he then was in bengal motion pictures employees union v. kohinumberr pictures p. limited 3 referred a.i.r.
effected by such dispute.
number 1660 respondent number 1 in a. number 1661 and respondents number.
in the first kerala case c. a vaidialingam j as he then was gave some additional reasons for supporting the view of bishan narain he referred to s. 2 i of the industrial disputes act 1947 for illustrating that a person shall be deemed to be independent for the purpose of his appointment as chairman or other members of a board companyrt or tribunal if he was unconnected with the industrial dispute referred to such board companyrt or tribunal or with any industry directly.
in such circumstances the appointment of a labour companymissioner who is companyversant with the employment companyditions cannumber be objected to on the ground that he was number an independent person.
1 to 5 in c.a.
a.i.r.
a.i.r.
it may be mentioned that in the judgment under appeal the andhra pradesh high companyrt has also taken the same view as the madhya pradesh companyrt.
