advantage over the control product and product 2 had a 4 0 psu advantage over the control product the least significant difference 95 confidence level was 1 0 psu in a similar test using meat and vegetables prepared in pyrex casserole dishes the same psu advantages over the control product were obtained with products 1 and 2 example ii______________________________________ 3 4 5 by weight of totalcomposition no composition______________________________________ monoethanolamine 20 83 16 5 benzene sulfonate monoethanolamine alkyl 20 11 10 2 16 5 polyglycol ether sulfate sodium paraffin sulfonate 28 0 10 0 34 conphos 34 1 0 1 0 1 0monoethanolamine 6 0 6 0 6 0industrial methylated 11 0 5 0 7 0water balance balance balance______________________________________ alkyl group has average of 11 8 carbon atoms sulfated condensation product of one mole of middle cut coconut alcoho with three moles of ethylene oxide secondary alkane sulfonate with 14 16 carbon atoms 34 conphos 34 of the composition shown above in each of the compositions of example ii of the 6 0 added monoethanolamine 1 2 is required to neutralize the 34 conphos 34 leaving 4 8 free monoethanolamine other effective compositions of the invention which are all clear single phase liquids are __________________________________________________________________________composition no 6 7 8 9 10 11 12__________________________________________________________________________ sodium paraffin sulfonate 20 0 10 0 magnesium alkyl sulfate magnesium alkyl polyglycol ether sulfate monoethanolamine linear alkyl benzene sulfonate 20 83 16 5 monoethanolamine alkyl sulfate 14 7 12 0 10 0 10 0 monoethanolamine alkyl poly glycol ether sulfate 20 11 21 8 16 5 14 7 12 0 16 0 16 0 dodecyldimethyl amine oxide 4 0 4 0 sodium alkyl glyceryl ether sulfate lauric monoethanolamide 2.