and plant response ratings were taken at approximately one week and nine weeks after application and are presented in table i table i______________________________________compound 4 treatment rate kg ai ha 0 125 0 5 1 wk 9 wks 1 wk 9 wks ______________________________________willow 9b 10b 9b 10bforsythia 1c 10c 3c 10cloblollypine 0 0 0 5happle 9c 10c 9c 10c______________________________________ salix sp forsythia sp pinus taeda and malus sp respectively the test compounds were dissolved in the same solvent described in example 1 and applied as overall sprays on several woody plants each situated in plastic pots containing soil the plants were maintained in a greenhouse and plant response ratings were taken at approximately one week and nine weeks after application and are presented in table ii table ii______________________________________compound 1 treatment rate kg ai ha a i active ingredient 0 016 0 031 0 125 1 wk 9 wks 1 wk 9 wks 1 wk 9 wks ______________________________________privet 3c 10c 3c 10c 3c 10cwillow 3b 9b 3b 9b 3b 10bforsythia 1c 10c 1c 10c 1c 10cloblollypine 0 0 1c apple 6b 10b 9b 10b 5b 10b______________________________________compound 2 treatment rate kg ai ha 0 016 0 031 0 125 1 wk 9 wks 1 wk 9 wks 1 wk 9 wks ______________________________________privet 3c 10c 3c 7c 4c 10cwillow 9b 10b 5b 9b 8b 10bforsythia 2c 8g 2c 5g 6c 10cloblollypine 0 0 0 apple 4b 9g 3b 3b 9g 5b 3b 9b______________________________________compound 4treatment rate kg ai ha0 016 0 031 0 062 0 125 1 9 1 9 1 9 1 9 wk wks wk wks wk wks wk wks ______________________________________privet 3c 10c 3c.