of the washing liquid was established the redepositing cellulase and protease mixture was added at a concentration of about 1 0 ml of mixture l of wash liquid all other processing parameters were the same as example 1 except that a different lot of denim was employed in this example and example 8 below compared to the redepositing cellulase control reflectance readings of the sample treated with redepositing cellulase protease were significantly different reflectance results correspond with the visual observation that the addition of protease protein in the mixture reduces the degree of redeposition on the denim garments compared to the redepositing cellulase control the protease treated garments show similar reflectance readings to a non depositing cellulase treatment the quality of abraded contrast in the fabric was also improved with the redepositing cellulase protease mixture compared to the redepositing cellulase alone see table iii below the test was performed in a similar manner as example 7 using the same redepositing cellulase and protease mixture however the ratio of cellulase to protease was changed and an additional heating process was included the mixture comprising indiage 44 l and protease gc899 was prepared in a ratio of about 60 1 based on total protein the mixture was further heated to a temperature of 37 u00b0 c for 120 hours before addition to the wash cycle in this example the amount is about 122 ppm total protein all other processing parameters were the same as those described in examples 1 and 7 similar to results in example 7 where garments are treated with a redepositing cellulase protease mixture treating garments with the redepositing cellulase protease mixture that has been previously heated results in improved reduction of backstaining compared to the garments treated.