5 gave higher retained density after high intensity daylight fading recording elements e 6 through e 10 of the invention were coated the same as described in example 1 except the amounts of p 2 and pigskin gelatin were varied keeping the final layer thickness constant at 8 61 g m 2 the amounts of each are summarized in table 2 below elements e 6 through e 10 and control elements c 3 and c 4 were printed as described in example 1 above and the results can be found in table 3 below the above results show that the recording elements e 6 through e 10 of the invention as compared to the control recording elements c 3 through c 4 gave higher retained density after high intensity daylight fading ink i 2 was prepared as described in example 1 except dye 2 0 58 was added in place of dye 1 elements e 1 through e 5 and control elements c 1 through c 5 were printed as described in example 1 except i 1 2 was used in place of i 1 after printing all images were allowed to dry at room temperature overnight the images were then subjected to a waterfastness test wf which involves soaking each imaged receiver in room temperature distilled water for 5 minutes and then allowing the image to dry at room temperature overnight the image quality of each print was then visually ranked and assigned a value between 0 and 5 the visual ranking is an indirect measure of how well the dye is fixed dye fixation to the receiver layer zero represents no image degradation better dye fixation and 5 represents severe image degradation poor dye fixation and the results are summarized in.