acceleration are monitored and checked 60 in case of detection of a nonstabilized event the outputs 28 from flight control system 2 are stopped in order to avoid interference while stabilization system 1 continues to process signals in order to recover from the event and to stabilize the platform another possibility of separation between the stabilization system 1 and the flight control system 2 is during temporary or major failure in the flight control system in such an event the stabilization system will maintain the platform balanced till recovery from the temporary failure event or will enable an emergency autorotation landing while keeping balanced immediately after recovery flight control system 2 resumes processing output signals 28 in order to maintain the requested flight parameters fig7 is a diagram showing how a user even an unskilled user can manually control some or all of the flight control handing control back to the system whenever necessary in a preferred embodiment of the present invention the flight control system enables manual control of the flight parameters in all 6 axes with the operator using a simple command set 74 directly or through an interface entered from a ground station 60 the commands are loaded to the flight control system via wireless communication 72 via a computer interface software or hardware the same wireless communication channel 72 can be used to download the flight plan before takeoff or to update the flight plan during flight the present invention can be applied in full or in part for many stable and nonstable flight platforms.