bushing vi elevation location vii surface connection node locations viii well spacing and well number ix fault locations and fluid boundaries x radius for drainage volume xi weight factor for maximum oil rate qmax and original oil in place oip and xii platform gathering center or drill center locations the use of these characteristics and others to generate wellbores is well known in the art the use of these characteristics and other wellbore hazard indicators to develop and update a plan for multiple wellbores with a reservoir simulator is not well known in the art however in step 224 determine if a mathematical optimizer is preferred to develop different combinations of wells and wellbores for connecting as many of the completion intervals as possible if a mathematical optimizer is preferred then the method 20011 proceeds to step 226 if a mathematical optimizer is not preferred then the method 200 b proceeds to step 228 in step 226 a mathematical optimizer is used to optimize a multi criteria objective function which may include techniques well known in the art for maximizing the connection of completion intervals using different combinations of wells and wellbores subject to the well geometry predetermined constraints in step 222 while minimizing the drilling cost of each anticipated well in step 228 different combinations of wells and wellbores are developed planned by connecting as many completion intervals as possible using the drainable volumes selected in step 218 subject to the well geometry predetermined constraints in step 222 and their ranked adjustment value in step 216 in the display 400 wellbores 402 404 406 are generated with respect to the well geometry predetermined constraints completion intervals 412 414 are not included in a wellbore path 402.