667 675 675 675lhsv 0 54 0 54 0 54 0 54 0 54days on stream 8 9 11 12 13pour point u00b0 f herzog 37 23 20 20 23astm d 97 45 25 20 25 25kv 40 u00b0 c cs 32 44 44 57 33 19 33 31 32 70kv 100 u00b0 c cs 5 507 5 574 5 523 5 543 5 489cloud pt u00b0 f 56 40 28 27 44lube yield wt 91 9 85 2 81 0 83 1 85 9v i 105 7 102 7 102 1 102 5 103 1______________________________________ fig5 shows the vi vs pour point response of the zsm 48 catalyst and compares this to a conventional ni zsm 5 catalyst for dewaxing the same feedstock the conditions used in the zsm 5 hydrodewaxing run were essentially the same except that the liquid hourly space velocity lhsv was maintained at 1 0 hr 1 instead of 0 5 hr 1 this data demonstrates that the zsm 48 catalyst produces a higher viscosity index material than zsm 5 at equivalent pour points additional data are plotted in fig6 and compare the lube yield vs product pour point data for the zsm 48 and zsm 5 catalysts these data show that the lube yields from both catalysts are equivalent at the target 20 u00b0 f pour point although.