swild poinsettiaspurge euphorbia hyssopifolia gt 85 gt 95 sspurge euphorbia polychroma 0 0 sspurge euphorbia supina gt 85 gt 95 sprostrate spurgeleguminosaebeggarweed desmodium tortuosum 0 0 r florida beggarweedlima bean phaseolus limensis 0 0 r jackson wonder cowpea vigna sinensis 0 0 r california pinkeye sicklepod cassia obtusifolia 0 0 r soybean glycine max forrest 0 0 r hill 0 0 rmalvaceaecotton gossypium hirsutum dpl 61 0 0 r stoneville 50 0 0 r okra abelmoschus esculentus 0 0 r clemson spineless prickly sida sida spinosa 0 0 r velvetleaf abutilon theophrasti 0 0 rsolanaceaetomato lycopersicon esculentum better boy 0 0 r manalucie 0 0 r rutgers 0 0 r______________________________________ sup a plants of each species were sprayed with inoculum containing 1 u00d7 10 sup 5 spores ml data were collected 14 days after inoculation sup b r resistant and s susceptible to the pathogen phytotoxic injury by the pathogen limited to flecking or small nondamaging burning of the leaves table 2______________________________________effect of growth stage on control of wild poinsettia byalternaria euphorbiicola sup agrowth stage plants killed ______________________________________cotyledon 331 leaf 832 leaves 1003 leaves 504 leaves 835 leaves 17______________________________________ sup a twelve plants at each growth stage were sprayed to wetness with a suspension containing 1 u00d7 10 sup 5 conidia ml plants received a 20hr dew period at 25 u00b0 c data were collected 14 days after inoculation table 3______________________________________effect of different dew period temperatures on the controlof wild.